HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1989.02.223L7
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
February 22, 1-989
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Amstrup asked Public Works Director Ralph Kirkup to introduce
the new Chief Building Inspector Franklj-n Means. Mr. Means invited
Council to visit him any time vrith questlons they may have about the
building department operation.
REHEARING OF SPECIAL PERM]T FOR REAL ESTATE OFFICE AT 1440 CHAPIN
City Planner reviewed her memo of February 9 which recommended coun-cil hold a public hearing and take action. David Harrison of Patson
Development Company, owner of office building at 1440 Chapin Avenue,is reguesting a conditional use permit in order to aIlow 7,168
square feet of the 44,000 square foot office building to be used forresidential real estate brokerage office in area zoned C-1 subareaB-1. A conditional use permit has been required since 1987 becausereal estate uses have been identified as being office uses which areparking intensive. The parking demand generated by this request is
1 parking space to L1"9 square feet compared to code requirement of 1parking space to 300 square feet. A use permit goes with theproperty and not with a given tenant. Planning Commission deniedthe application in october 1988, and on appeal council subsequently
acted in November to deny $rithout prejudice. The applicant firstproposed to give a total of 22 on-site parking spaces with possible
use of 17 more. The current proposal allows for use of 30 on-siteparking spaces.
Councilwoman Barton stated she would abstain from discussing orvoting on this matter because of a conflict of interest. councilman
Pagliaro inquired of City Pl-anner if owner is willing to let Iay
fa1low a certain percentage of building that is now unrented becauseof the lack of parking spaces since the proposed use uses more thanits share at 1 parking space to 300 square feet. City Plannerreplied that the owner has not offered that alternative.
Mayor Amstrup opened the public hearing.
David Harrison, Patson Development Company, thanked Council for aI-
lowing them to be heard on the matter. He stated that the firm of
T,JKM v,ras engaged to conduct an independent parking study and wouldreport the findings to council. He stated the building is leased tothree long-term tenants and that they are not using their fuII ratioof parking. He indicated that there is more than enough parkingavailable for Grubb & E1lis. Because of the delay in this applica-tion, his firm is losing $13,000 a month in rent. In the spirit ofcooperation and in connection with the crubb & EIIis lease, he of-fered to open the ground floor parking level to public parking onweekends to relieve the public parking problem in the area. He
asked that council reconsider the use permit.
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City council was
held on the above date in the city HaII council Chambers. The meet-
ing was cal]ed to order at ?:33 p.m. by Mayor Irving S. Amstrup.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAI.ICE TO THE FLAG
Led by Planning Commissioner Mike Ellis in the audience.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: AMSTRUP, BARTON, LEI4BI , MANGINI , PAGLIARO
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: NONE
MINUTES
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 5, 1989, were approved.
PRESENTATION OF CHTEF BUILDING INSPECTOR
318
Steve Weinberger of TJKM, representing Patson Development, reported
the findings of the traffic and parking survey. Survey was con-
ducted in the vicinity of the 1440 chapin building on wednesday and
Thursday of the previous week during peak business hours before and
after the lunch hour. on and off street spaces were surveyed.
Chapin lots were used less than those in the Primrose area. He
noted that the office space j-n the 1440 Chapln building is presently
47t occupied and the parking is 27% occupied. AIso surveyed was the
crubb & El1is office at 400 Primrose and
parking hours was Monday afternoon from 1
a maximum number of 19 people. He state
1440 Chapin building would generate 131
hours and there are 155 spaces supplied.
was found that the peakp.m. to 2:30 p.m. with
hat fully occupied the
ked vehicles during peak
these the crubb & EIIisk hours which isb & E1lis leavingfice, they found
4,000 square foot
ir
:30dr
par
of
office would generate 11 parked vehicLes during the peak which is 8
less than are currently being generated.
councilman Paglj-aro stated his concern that the current Grubb & EI-
Iis office be used for something other than a high parking impact
office would generate 25 parked vehicles during pea
83% occupancy for their 30 spaces. Based on Grub
the 400 Primrose office and a new tenant in that of
that based on more modern office occupancies the
use such assultant did
consideredstated that
the city
supportinthe city'would bebitrary.
ar
not
to
the
out og this par
pen
she
ea1 estate office. He inquired why the traffic con-
conduct the survey during the lunch hour which isbe Burlingame Avenuers peak hour. Mr. Weinbergery wanted to survey parking conditions when people
were in their offices during business hours. He noted that during
Iunch hours, office people tend to leave the premises. Councilman
Pagliaro reiterated that the lunch hour is the most heavily impacted
time for on street parking.
Doug Mcceorge, Manager of Grubb & Ellis office, commented on the
crubb & El1is Burlingame office being the flagship of the Grubb &
El1is fIeet. He felt that they have become victims of their own
success and are being penalized for their success by not being al-
lowed to expand. He stated that the survey showed there was not an
intense use at any given time with the exception of Monday morning
during sales meetings. He asked council to consider the new
evidence and allow them to make their move.
Phyllis Andelin, attorney representing Patson Development company,
indicated that the facts presented to council tonight were not
prevously presented. she noted that there is ample parking for the
tenants on the 1440 Chapin site and that the new location of Grubb &
Ellis would alleviate the parking problem in downtown Burlingame.
She urged council to look at the facts carefully and to not make
their decision based on speculation. She stressed the IegaI sig-
nificance of the matter and that council should exercise their
discretion IawfuIIy. She stated that if council exercised their
discretion in an arbitrary or unreasonable way, the eity and the
people making the decision would be unnecessarily exposed to
Iiability. She noted that Patson Development did not want to sue
anybody, but only to use their building. She indicated that the
relocation of Grubb & EIIis would alleviate a severe parking situa-
tj-on on Primrose and free up spaces for retail merchants on Prim-
rose. To not allov,l them to move would force a long-time tenant of
f the city. She urged council to read the petitions
s move. She indicated that the building conformed to
king requirements. To deny the use of the building
alizing the building owner and could be seen as ar-
stated that the development company followed every
code and requirement in building the structure. She noted that the
offer by the owner to allow free public off-street parking on the
weekends is made in the spirit of cooperation. She felt that a ra-
tionally based decision would allow the applicant to continue with
their proposed use.
Dolly Toms, 731 Newhall, Hillsborough, addressed council in support
of the matter on behalf of Grubb & Ellis and thanked them for the
chance to be heard. She stated that being a part of the city was
important and that they wanted to increase their business.
Jim Karel, 1469 Bel1evue, resides and works in Burl-ingame. Ex-pressed to council his concern about the parking situation and how
much he cares for this town. He offered his fuII support for this
proj ect .
Mayor Nnstrup closed the public hearing.
councilman Pagliaro complimented Mr. Harrison's presentation. He
disagreed vrith the statement that Grubb & Ellis t as treated un-fairly. He felt the idea of the parking study was an excellent idea
and Mr. weinberger made a good presentation; however, the peak houris the lunch hour as far as on street parking is concerned. Hestated that he appreciated Mr. Mcceorge and Ms. Toms for attending
the meeting. He indicated that he did not appreciate the corunents
made by Ms. Andelin or being lectured by a feIlow member of the Bar
as to what the law is. Councilman Pagliaro noted that in an effortto help Grubb & Ellis and Patson, he suggested that if they couldget some tlz1re of agreement from the other office that it might be amitigating cj-rcumstance. He noted that another real estate use
could move into the present crubb & EIIis office without councilpermission and there would be two highly impacted office uses r^'here
there is presently one. He is not prepared to overturn the planning
commission.
Mayor Amstrup agreed with councilman Pagliaro, and hoped Grubb & EI-lis would decide to stay in Burlingame. The decision was not aimedat Grubb & Ellis but to alleviate a parking problem. councilman
Mangini stated that his strongest platform in the past 20 years has
been the alleviation of the parking problem dobrntown. He noted thatrules of the code must be met to grant a conditional use permit and
he felt that this projected use permit did not meet the requirementsfor this area.
Councilman Lembi agreed with the comments made by the other council-
members; however, he favored the move by Grubb & Ellis to this loca-tion because of an opportunity to help alleviate the parking situa-tion. He speculated that there may not be another tenant moving into the vacant site who is as heavily intensified in use as Grubb &
-E;_Lrl-s.
Councilman Mangini moved to deny the special permit for real estateoffice at 1440 Chapin. seconded by councilman Pagliaro, the motioncarried 3-1-0 on roll call vote, Councilman tembi voting no and
Councj.lvroman Barton abstaining.
Mayor Amstrup called a recess at 8:35 pm. The meeting reconvened at
8:45 pm.
APPEAL OF THREE VARIANCES FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 143 DI,II GHT
City Planner reviewed her memo of February 10 which recommendedcouncil hold a public hearing and take action. John and Diane
Barnes are requesting three variances so that they can make a 305
square foot family room study addition on the first floor and a 940
square foot tr^ro bedroom bath addition on the second floor of theirhouse. The first variance is required because the first floor addi-tion wiII be built to the side property line where a six foot side
setback is required. The second variance is required because the
dormers on the second floor wiII create habitabLe space outside thedeclining height envelope and the third variance is for the amountof habitable area inside the dormer which is outside of the declin-ing height envelope. The request is for 72 square feet and the code
allor4rs 35 sguare feet. The project proposes no change to the exist-ing detached garage and it does meet the current parking require-
ment .
Councilwoman Barton had viewed the house and asked if the firstfloor addition would be to the property line. City Planner con-firmed that the first floor addition would be to the property line,
and not beyond as is the existing house.
Councilman Lembi asked for clarification on the second andvariance. city Planner explained the dormers on the upperplan would be setback three feet from the legal property
thirdfloorIine.
319
320
Councilman uangini inquired what are the reasons for the threevariances. City Planner confirmed that the applicants presently
have a building permit for a second story addition that meets code
requirements.
Mayor Amstrup opened the public hearing.
Bill Van Husen, architect representing applicants, spoke to council
on the project. He clarified the square footage of the project and
the variance plans. He noted that since the project vras permittedprior to the declining height ordinance, the request for variance
was not for the total square footage but for a percentage of that.He noted the unusual circumstance of the property being on a zerolot line. Considering the age of the house and specific architec-tura] character of the interior and exterior, the applicant has beenlimited to certain areas of construction regarding setback restric-tions and lot line conditions.
Councilman Pagliaro asked Mr. Van Husen if the addition would be
constructed over the property line into the easement. Mr. Van Husen
stated it would not. city Planner noted that the applicant IegaIIy
cannot build over the property Iine.
John Barnes, applicant, asked if council had any questions. coun-cilman Mangini inquired if the greenhouse would be moved. Mr.
Barnes stated it would be moved to the front. Councilman Mangini
then asked if that was permissible. city Planner stated that it wasnot permissible to put a structure in the front setback without avariance. Council!,roman Barton stated she had no problems with thefirst floor variance .
Councilman Pagliaro inquired of Mr. Barnes if he had discussed theproject with his neighbor. Mr. Barnes stated that his neighbor had
submitted a letter of support.
Mayor Amstrup closed the public hearing.
Councilman Lembi complimented the applicantsthey did on designing this project andvariances. Seconded by Councilman Pagliaro,
on roll call vote.
for the outstanding job
moved to approve the
the motion carried 5-0
APPEAL OF FENCE EXCEPTION AT 1152 CABRILLO AVENUE
Item continued to March 5 Council meeting.
SECOND READING - ORDINANCE 1387 - STOP SIGNS AT BROADWAY A}ID CORTEZ
Pub1ic Works Director reviewed his memo of January 31 in which theTraffic Safety and Parking commission has recommended installationof stop signs at this intersection and staff has recommended against
the action.
Councilman Pagliaro inguired if there were stop signs presently atCortez. Public Works Director confirmed there $rere stop signs oncortez at Broadway; this ordinance lvould install two stop signs on
Broadway at Cortez.
Mayor Amstrup opened the public hearing.
Betty Blumer, !702 Broadway, spoke in favor of the stop signs. She
stated that she and her neighbors would like to see the traffic on
Broadway slowed down. Donald Ruggiero, 1720 Broadway, also spoke in
support of the stop signs.
Mayor Amstrup closed the public hearing.
Councilman Pagliaro fel-t that allowing a stop sign at every inter-
section would bring traffic to a dead stop. He questioned the logicin so many stop signs. Councilman Lembi felt it was appropriate at
this time to allow the stop signs at this location, but he cautioned
not to place too much confidence in stop signs since people often go
through them.
Councilman Lembi moved to install stop signs as requested. Mayor
Amstrup seconded the motion stating it was a necessity at this cor-
ner. The motion carried on a 5-0 roll call vote.
SPE CIAL PERMIT FOR AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA AT 733 PLYMOUTH
Mayor Amstrup noted that council will hold a closed session on this
matter at the end of the meeting after the public hearing. city At-
torney reviewed his memo of February 14 in which he recommended
council adopt a resolution issuing a special permit to Vernon Howard
for an amateur radio antenna at 733 Plymouth way. He noted that the
matter has been in litigation since council denied the special per-
mit in September 1987. He stated that the matter of attorneys fees,
in which Mr. Howard feels he is entitled to $19,000+, has not been
resolved.
Mayor Amstrup opened the floor for comments.
Mr. vernon Howard, 733 Plymouth way, gave a lengthy review of his
efforts to receive a special permit for his amateur radio antenna.
He described in great detaiL the valuable service amateur radio
operators perform in emergency situations. He requested council or-
der pal.ment of his attorneys fees so that this matter may be put in
the past.
Councilman Pagliaro asked Mr. Howard if he would be willing to
sider a height limitation between the allowabfe 25 feet and 51
requested. Mr. Howard replied negatively. Councilman Pagliaro
asked if Mr. Hovrard was wilting to consider a limitation of h
the antenna would be at full extension. Mr. Howard replied n
tive Iy.
Mayor Amstrup closed the hearing and explained that counciL will
into executive session at the conclusion of the meeting.
con-feet
then
ours
ega-
go
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilman Pagliaro stated that he would abstain from voting on item
h-2 because of a potential conflict of interest.
a. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 1388 - REvIEw PROCEDURES FoR SECOND
STORY ADDITIONS IN HILLSIDE AREAS
City Ptannerts memo of February 16 recolunended council introduce
ordinance 1388 for public hearing at the next regular meeting on
March 5.
b. RESOLUE]ON 18-89 ACCEPTING COMPLEEION OF HIGHWAY ROAD
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CP 623
Public workts memo of February 9 recommended council approve
resolution accepting compLetion of the Highh,ay Road Bridqe con-tract by Cunningham & Sons in the amount of $12,666.80.
c. RESOLUTIoN 19-89 AWARDING BID FOR 1989 STREET REPAfRS - CP 817
Public work's memo of February 10resolution awarding contract for
facing program to G. Bortolotto &
$303,466.89.
recommended council approve
1989 street repair and resur-
Company in the amount of
d RESOLUTION 20-89 AGREEMENT FOR TESTING SERVICES FOR 1989 STREET
REPAIRS - CP 817
approveInc in
RESOLUT]ON 21-89 AGREEMENT WITH PG&E FOR RAISING POWER LINES
cP 70050
Public work's memo of February L5 reconunended council adoptresolution authorizing City Manager to execute agreement forraising the northerly power line at a cost of $47,000.
32I
Public work's memo of February 10 recommended councilresolution authorizing agreement $rith Testing Engineers,
the amount of $23 ,622.
f RESOLUTION 22-89 AGREEMENT W]TH SP RA]IROAD FOR ]NSTALLATION OF
WATER MAIN UNDER TRACKS - CP 76132
Public work's memo of February 14 recommended council adoptresolution authorj-zing City Manager to execute agreement vrith
Southern Pacific Transportation Company.
RESOLUTION 23-89 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES FOR WATER SYSTEM DESIGN- cP '122
Public workrs memo of February 1-5 recommended council approveresolution authorizing agreement with Tesco Associates in the
amount of $19,500 for professional design and construction serv-
ices.
h. DENIAL OF CLAIMS - (1) A. MOCK; (2) OLD REPUBLfC INSURANCE
City Attorney's memo of February 1 recommended denial of 1) A.Mock's claim for damage to her in a coll-ision on December 24 at
Broadway and Rollins Road; and 2) old Republic Insurance's claimregarding San Mateo county Cities Insurance Joint Powers
Authority.
i. CITY INVESTMENT POLICY
city Treasurerrs memo of February 9 recommended council approve
the policy as required by state 1aw.
s
)FINAL CONDO MAP - ].221 OAK GROVE
Public workrs memo of Eebruary 15 recommended council approvefinal condominium map for t22L oak Grove Avenue.
K. TENTATfVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR RELOCATION OF LOT LINES FOR
TWO PARCELS AT 1755 BAYSHORE 810 MALCOLM
Public workrs memo of February 15 recommended council concurwith the Planning commission and approve the map showing therelocation of the boundary betrr,een two existing parcels to form
two different parcels.
1. WARRANTS A},ID PAYROLL
Finance Director recommended approval of warrants 2022 - 2427
duly audited, in the amount of $489,131.48, and Payroll Checks
11559 - 72286 for the month of January 1989, in the amount of
$7 42,126.77 .
Councilman Mangini moved approval- of the consent calendar.
by Councilman Lembi, unanimously approved by voice vote.
Seconded
OLD BUSINESS
Councilman Lembi requested that warning signs be posted in the loca-tion where the two new stop signs would be installed. Public Works
Director confirmed this would be done.
NEW BUSINESS
Councilman Mangini spoke in favor of the Broadway Merchants requestfor stop signs on Broadway at Paloma and asked that it be sent to
the Traffic Safety and Parking commission for their corunents and ad-vice only.
Councilman Pagliaro apprised council of the $150 annual dues payment
made by the city to the International society of stress and re-
quested information from staff.
Councilman Lembi received several phone calls from elderly citizens
regarding the BFI recycling bins. He agreed with their concerns
over the added cost for this service as being a hardship for senior
citizens on fixed incomes, especially when 1ts a voluntary service
that many of them may not use. It t as requested that this item be
placed on a future study agenda for discussion.
322
323
a
b
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
commission Minutes:
February l- 3 .
Beautification, February 2; P1anning,
Department Reports: Building Inspection Report, January 1989.
c. Proclamations: Curbside Recycling Month; woments Hal1 of Fame;
Arbor Day.
Mayor Amstrup congratulated Civil Service commissioner clara Crook
on her appointment to the women's HalI of Fame.
d. Letter from Turner-Hittenberger regarding camphor trees.
Mayor Amstrup noted that manufacturers of foam cups
chlorof luorocarbons from all plastic foam cups
release of chemicals into the atmosphere.
have removedto diminish the
e
f
Letter from Kathleen Beerbohm requesting smoke free restaurants.
noise from over-Letter from Dr. Btoom regarding airplane
flights.
council$roman Barton asked city Manager to draft a reply to Dr.
BIoom.
s. Letter from National Arbor Day Foundation notifying Burlingame
is designated Tree city USA for tenth year.
Councilman Lembi thanked council and staff for sending a plant to
him during his foot surgery.
FROM THE FLOOR
There were no conunents from the floor.
CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Arnstrup recessed to closed session at 9:55 pm.
RESOLUTION 24-89 - SPECfAL PERM]T FOR AMATUER RADIO ANTENNA AT
733 PLYMOUTH
Mayor Amstrup reconvened the meeting at 10:44 pm. councj.Iwoman Bar-
ton asked Mr. Howard if he would be willing to l-o!,rer his antenna
during the daytime hours. Mr. Howard replied no. Councilman Lembi
asked Mr. Hohrard if he envisioned Iowering his antenna during any
24-hour period to any height less than 51 feet. Mr. Howard replied
that he would lower the antenna during non use hours.
councilman Mangini moved to accept Resolution 24-89 issuing a spe-
cial permit to Mr. Howard, and Councilwoman Barton seconded the mo-
tion.
councj-lman Pagliaro was of the opinion that the proposal made by the
City Attorney was not in congruence with the spirit of the judge's
order suggesting compromise on both sides. He felt that council was
willing to compromise with Mr. Howard as shown in the conditions;
however, Mr. Howard was not so wi11ing.
The motion carried on 3-2 roII call vote urith Councilman Pagliaro
and Mayor Amstrup voting no.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was regularly adjourned at 10:49 p.m
Judith A. Malfattcity clerk
vmy