HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - BC - 1987.02.05N 0 T I C E
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
MEETING: FEBRUARY 5, 1987
* 5:30 P.M. *
A G E N D A
I. ROLL CALL
II. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 4, 1986
III. COMMUNICATIONS
IV. REPORTS
A. Park Director
B. Chairman
C. Commissioners
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Tree Removal/3045 Rivera
B. Tree Removal/1561 Eastmoor
`.. C. Request for reconsideration/Tree Removals/
2627 Easton Dr.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Tree Removal/3005 Rivera Dr.
B. Arbor Day
C. Spring Garden Seminar
D. Nominating Committee for the Election of
1987 Officers
VII. FROM THE FLOOR
November 26, 1986
Beautification Commission
City of Burlingame,
Burlingame, Ca. 94010
RE: Ltr. dated October 20, 1980
Audr6 L. Nelson
Gentlemen:
In quoting the above and aforementioned letter the problem
created by the very same tree has not been resolved - six years
later and with several thinning out crews doing their part to
create a little sun on our house.
I have mildew inside the house around the windows and we
have mildew outside the house, all caused by the tree in our
front lawn which was supposed to have been planted by your
commission before it became a Commission, I an no longer a
young woman and cannot keep up with removing mildew inside and
outside our home. Also, I cannot think of a valid reason IklY
we should pay someone to remove it for us.
Please remove the tree. If you do not, I will have it
done :
Sincerely,
(Mrs. William A. Nelson)
3045 Rivera Drive
Burlingame, Ca. 94010
(415) 697-6676
il
0
0
DATE: MARCH 5, 1987
TO: BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
FROM: RICHARD QUADRI - DIRECTOR OF PARKS
RE: EUCALYPTUS TREE AT 3045 RIVERA
At your meeting of February 5, 1987, you reviewed the request for removal
of a Eucalyptus Lehmannii at 3045 Rivera Drive. The applicant, Audre' L.
Nelson, was present and stated her concerns. It is her contention that
the tree shades her house of the extent that mildew has formed both
inside and outside her house, and therefore should be removed. Mrs.
Nelson made a similar request in 1978 and was turned down by the Com-
mission. Since then our crew has thinned the tree on several occasions,
most recently in January of this year.
EUCALYPTUS LEHMANNII is the prevalent tree on Rivera Drive, and the tree
in question is typical of others on the street. It is staff opinion that
the tree is not causing the mildew problem and does not significantly
shade the house. Therefore, we have taken the position that there is
not sufficient justification for removal of this tree.
Richard P. Quadri
Director of Parks
Zhr &fia of Nurlmpmr
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TELJ(415) 342-8931
February 11, 1987
Ms. Carla Vitali
1561 Eastmoor Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Ms. Vitali:
At its regular meeting of February 5, 1987, the Burlingame Beautification
Commission voted unanimously to deny your application for removal of the
birch tree at the above address.
Should an have you
y y further questions, please contact the Park Department
at 342-8931.
Sincerely,
Richard P. Quadri
Director of Parks
RPQ/kh
z4r &t� Jaf Nurlin-�Zxmr
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931
February 11, 1987
Mrs. Mary P. Carr
2627 Easton Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mrs. Carr:
At its regular meeting of February 5, 1987, the Burlingame Beautification
Commission received your letter requesting review of their denial for tree
removal in front of your property.
The Commission stands by its decision of October 2, 1986 for the reasons
outlined in my letter of December 3, 1986. Any appeal of this decision
must be addressed to the City Council.
Should you have any further questions, please contact the Park Department
at 342-8931.
Sincerely,
Richard P. Quadri
Director of Parks
RPQ/kh
.)ec/5/198'
U oe olarkas
3005 Rivera Irv.
urlingame v i 94010
l0 The )eauti.f.ication �omittee
ity of Burlingame Utz
uertlemen, or Ladies "
I'm writing; to you regarding the tree in front of my home , at 3005
iivera )rv. .purl.
1 called the jburl. pity ball, and a i�x. Steve sorter was sent out
from the narks jept. 1 showed him that this tree should be removed.
16ecouse tn.e roots are coussing extensive damage to my property,and
to the :ity sewer pipes, and the sidewalks.
The roots are growing higher out of the ground, and my gardener is
coutioning me for years, that the tree will fall over, and it might
damage my home.
in the 25 years since we live in our home, we edured a mass of abuse
from this one tree. when in 'plume, it atracts :yeas, a*4nts, and
other insects for it's Sapp.
when the finger -like connes ripen, they fall all over by the thousands,
and the wind blows them into the chemney too. The pollen gives us an
alergie reaction every year.
This tipe of tree is a newsance, and therefore most of my neighbors
had theirs removed through the years,
Out of 39 homes in my block, there are only 8 trees left including mine.
The Moto -.tooter has bin teling .me that the reason 1 have to call them
so often is becouse the roots of the tree is breaking up the ceramic
sewer pipes. So please help us after 25 years to corect this mistake
the .;ity made by pknting such a bad kinde of tree, and give
autorization to ia. sorter to remove this tree from my front yard.
:r. sorter said that our request is very vell founded, he tovagrees
the tree should go, but he must have your authorization to do it.
In the hope of your goodwill and understanding,
1 remain yours truly,
4
C� ,e �Zt� .a.0 13ur1Tn13ame
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931
February 11, 1987
Mr. Joe Farkas
3005 Rivera Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Farkas:
According to our tree crew leadworker, Steve Porter, you were satisfied
with the trimming done on the City tree in front of your property. Mr.
Porter also indicated that the problem you were experiencing with bees
�-' and ants is being caused by some neighboring bottle brush.
Please write or call our department at 342-8931 to further discuss your
previous request to remove the tree.
Sincerely,
Kar ene Harve�
Secretary/Park Dept.