Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2020.05.18CITY O BURLINGAME $AarEo � xE � BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Approved Minutes Regular Meeting on May 18, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date online at 7:01 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Beach. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O'Brien Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 5. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor Beach reviewed the upcoming events taking place in the city. 6. PRESENTATIONS a. UPDATE FROM THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ("YAC") Nicole Houghton introduced the Youth Advisory Committee and stated that they had been working hard over the past year. Burlingame High School junior Carina Husain reviewed events that YAC helped host over the past year including the Royal Ball. She noted that this year's initiative was the environment and going green. She added that YAC met with Mayor Beach to discuss the important issues in Burlingame. Our Lady of Angels seventh grader Taylor Roe reviewed YAC Attack, a conference put on by teens for teens. 1 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Crystal Springs High School freshman Dylan Aguinaldo reviewed initiatives that YAC undertook to assist small businesses during the shelter -in -place order. YAC showed the Council and meeting participants two videos that they created, one promoting local businesses and one depicting the work they had undertaken over the year. Councilmember Colson thanked YAC for their work highlighting local businesses. Councilmember Brownrigg thanked YAC for helping to clean up Mills Canyon. The Council thanked YAC for all their hard work over the past year. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT Steve and Elizabeth Johnson asked that the City consider making the 700 block of Concord a part of the "Safe Street" program. (comment submitted via publiccomment(&burlin ag me.org). Adrienne Leigh thanked the Council for their support of utilizing a portion of Carolan Avenue for the "Safe Street" program. She asked that the Council consider closing Burlingame Avenue. (comment submitted via publiccomment(&,,burlin ag me.org). Councilmember Brownrigg asked that the City Manager review the timeline for when Council would discuss potentially closing Burlingame Avenue. City Manager Goldman stated that the Economic Development Subcommittee met last week and discussed closing Burlingame Avenue. Additionally, she spoke with the DBID, and they are sending out a survey to their members about this possibility. She noted that the item would be brought to Council in June. San Mateo County LGBTQ Commissioner Guiliana Garcia asked the Council to consider supporting the LGBTQ community by recognizing Pride Month this June. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Beach asked her colleagues and members of the public if they would like to pull any item off the Consent Calendar. No items were pulled. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt the Consent Calendar, seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE MAY 4, 2020 REGULAR MEETING City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council approve the Meeting Minutes for the May 4, 2020 Regular Meeting. 2 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes b. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP (PM 20-02), LOT SPLIT OF BURLINGAME MAP NO. 1 SUBDIVISION, LOT 17, BLOCK 7, POLO FIELD SUBDIVISION, AND LOTS 14, 15, 16, AND A PORTION OF LOT 8, BLOCK 7, TOWN OF BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION AT 135 LORTON AVENUE DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 058-2020. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PUBLIC HEARING TO RENEW THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME AVENUE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 DPW Murtuza stated that this is a procedural public hearing for the renewal and collection of assessments for the Downtown Burlingame Avenue streetscape improvements that the Council approved in 2012. He noted that the Council is required to approve the assessments every year. He added that there have been no changes in the assessments. Mayor Beach opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 059-2020; seconded by Councilmember Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. b. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 25.59 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS), CHAPTER 25.60 (ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN R-1 AND R-2 DISTRICTS), CHAPTER 25.26 (R-1 DISTRICT REGULATIONS) AND CHAPTER 25.70 (OFF-STREET PARKING) OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH RECENTLY ADOPTED AMENDMENTS TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.2 AND 65852.22 AND ADDITIONAL CHANGES TO REMOVE CONSTRAINTS TO CREATING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Planning Manager Ruben Hurin stated that in response to California's statewide and the Bay Area's regional housing shortages, the Governor signed into law a number of bills to encourage the construction of accessory dwelling units ("ADU") and junior accessory dwelling units ("JADU"). The State laws reduce the regulatory barriers commonly found in local zoning ordinances. Additionally, the State legislation supersedes the City's regulations for ADUs. Planning Manager Hurin explained that on March 2, 2020, the Council reviewed a proposed ordinance to amend Chapter 25.59 of the Municipal Code and other related Municipal Code sections pertaining to ADUs. After further discussion, the Council continued action on the item, and requested that staff provide additional information and clarifications on: (1) roof configuration and height of detached ADU, (2) windows and skylights, (3) permeable surface and trees, (4) solar panels, (5) ADUs, JADUs, and the Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA"). Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Planning Manager Hurin reviewed the different types of ADUs including detached, attached, converted garages, or conversions/interior. He noted that a maximum of two detached ADUs may be added to a lot containing a multi -family structure. He added that JADUs are only permitted within the walls of a single- family dwelling. Planning Manager Hurin stated that in addition to allowing double pitched roofs, the Council expressed a desire to allow shed roof and flat roof designs on detached ADUs. He explained that some members of the Council felt that these types of roofs could be more sensitive to neighbors in some situations and that flat roofs offer additional benefits such as allowing for green roofs and solar panels. He stated that the language was revised to clarify that green roofs are permitted. Planning Manager Hurin stated that because there is an eclectic mix of architecture throughout Burlingame, shed and flat roofs would allow ADUs to be compatible with mid-century, new modern/contemporary, and Spanish style homes. He added that many homeowners prefer the simplicity of an ADU with a flat or shed roof, even though it may differ from the design of their existing home. He stated that the revisions to the proposed ordinance would permit detached ADUs to have double -pitched, hip, shed (single slope), or flat roofs and would not require that the same roof configuration or pitch be used to match the main dwelling. Planning Manager Hurin reviewed ADU plate height. He stated that in most cases, the maximum plate height would not be allowed to exceed nine feet. However, the exception would be ADUs with shed roofs, which would specify that the plate height on the lower side of the structure cannot exceed nine feet above adjacent grade, while the taller side of the structure can be up to 16 feet tall. He explained that to avoid a 16- foot wall along the side or rear property line, the maximum plate height allowed on walls parallel with side and rear property lines is nine feet. Planning Manager Hurin reviewed staff s recommendations for windows and skylights for ADUs and JADUs. He explained that Council noted concerns about skylights on sloping roofs facing a neighbor's property and windows abutting side and rear property lines. He stated that windows and skylights are standard features typically found in living areas, are necessary to comply with egress requirements, and provide natural light and ventilation. He noted that windows and skylights would be required to comply with the applicable Building and Fire codes, which means that in most cases, no openings would be allowed within four to five feet of the property line. Planning Manager Hurin stated that to address the Council's concerns and allow for the ability to provide flexibility in the design of living spaces, staff suggests the following changes to the proposed ordinance: • Require a CUP for skylights on sloped roofs facing side yards that are located within ten feet of the property line and on roofs facing rear property lines • Require a CUP for windows located within four feet of the property line on walls that are parallel with side and rear property lines Planning Manager Hurin noted that staff received a letter from Matthew Gelfand of Californians for Homeownership expressing concerns with certain sections of the draft ordinance. He stated that staff hasn't had the opportunity to review the letter in detail but would before the proposed ordinance comes back for adoption. 4 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Councilmember Ortiz asked if he was correct that a skylight wouldn't be allowed on the slope of a roof that goes towards the neighbor's property line. Planning Manager Hurin stated that the applicant would have to apply for a conditional use permit. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if it is 800 or 850 square feet that is exempt from FAR. Planning Manager Hurin stated that staff is proposing that 850 square feet be exempt. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if it exceeds 850 square feet, is it just what exceeds that is added to the FAR, or is it the whole ADU. Planning Manager Hurin stated that the whole ADU would be added to FAR. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if it is possible to incorporate that if you have a window that is facing someone's rear yard, the window must be obscure. Planning Manager Hurin stated that this would be difficult to do. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran stated that the purpose of ADUs is to create affordable housing. She asked how the City will ensure that an ADU is used for housing and not as a way around the FAR limits. Planning Manager Hurin stated that State law doesn't provide any safeguards for this issue. He noted that staff sees the ADU as a flex space and will encourage owners to use it as affordable housing. However, it is hard to monitor this situation. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if the City could require that the ADU be registered so that the City can monitor the space. She noted that she didn't want people to take advantage of the ordinance in order to get around the FAR limits. Planning Manager Hurin stated that at the final inspection, staff makes sure that there is a kitchen facility and that it is properly built as an ADU. City Attorney Kane stated that staff would look into this concern. Mayor Beach asked the City Clerk to read the title of the ordinance. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer read the title of the ordinance. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to waive further reading and introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. Mayor Beach opened the public hearing. Jennifer Pfaff voiced her concern about permeable surfaces and trees in relation to ADU projects. She asked that the proposed ordinance state that the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection ordinance applies. (comment submitted via publiccomment&burlin ag me.org). Planning Manager Hurin stated that staff has a set of ADU guidelines that they have put out for the public. He explained that the City will include the requirement that it needs to comply with the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection ordinance. He added that as the ADU goes through the building process, the City's Parks Division will review the plan. City Attorney Kane stated that she would recommend against specifically calling out the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection ordinance in the proposed ADU ordinance. She explained that all of the 5 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes City's ordinances apply, and therefore if the City singles out one ordinance, it might look as if the others don't apply. Mayor Beach closed the public hearing. Councilmember Brownrigg thanked staff for incorporating Council's concerns into the proposed ordinance. He stated that Ms. Pfaff s point is well made, and that the City doesn't currently regulate subterranean excavation. He explained that the City should consider banning excavation within the side and potentially rear setback. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the State is determined to take away any of the City's ability to create an urban forest and open space on lots. He noted that the State assigns low value to yards and space. The City has been playing catch up on State regulations, and therefore he thought the City should rethink how it wants to consider its single-family neighborhoods. He suggested potentially allowing duplexes and triplexes that allow for space and thereby get ahead of the State's regulations. Councilmember Ortiz thanked staff for the proposed ordinance and believed it was workable. Councilmember Colson voiced her appreciation to the Mehtas for their concerns about how the original ADU ordinance wouldn't work for their Eichler house. (email attached to staff report). She noted that she was thankful for their perspective. Mayor Beach asked the City Clerk to publish notice of the proposed ordinance and for it to be brought back at the next Council meeting on June 1, 2020. c. CONSIDERAITON OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE SUSPENDING CURRENT PENALITIES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY THE 2020 DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY City Manager Goldman stated that staff has been talking to the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau President John Hutar about the challenges that the hotels are facing as a result of COVID-19. She explained that the hotels have asked for a change in the way that the assessments are collected. She stated that the City serves as the agent for the Tourism Business Improvement District ("TBID") and brings to Council the proposed assessments each year. City Manager Goldman stated that TBID has asked that the assessment process be changed. She explained that TBID proposes the following: • Quarter One — No changes • Quarter Two — Assessment suspended for all hotel partners • Quarter Three — Assessment reduced by 50% • Quarter Four — Assessment reduced by 50% 6 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes She noted that the Quarter Two proposal poses some logistical issues for the City as the assessments have already been paid or are in the process of being paid. City Manager Goldman stated that because the assessment process was set by ordinance, the City needs to adopt an urgency ordinance to allow for TBID's proposal. City Attorney Kane stated that there are two items before the Council: • An urgency ordinance that must be adopted by a super majority, which is an affirmative vote of four • A resolution of intent to set a public hearing to modify the 2020 District Assessments Mayor Beach asked the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed urgency ordinance. City Clerk Hassel - Shearer read the title. Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to waive further reading and introduce the proposed interim urgency ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5- 0. Mayor Beach opened the public hearing. San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau President and CEO John Hutar thanked the Council for considering the matter. He noted that the hotels are hurting and that about 25% of the members' room inventory is closed. Mayor Beach closed the public hearing. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance Number 1977; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 060-2020; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. 10. STAFF REPORTS a. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DRAFT LYON HOAG AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS TRAFFIC CALMING STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT PREPARED BY TJKM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS DPW Murtuza stated that in 2018, the City held a Town Hall meeting with residents of Lyon Hoag and adjacent neighborhoods. The purpose of this meeting was to provide them with an opportunity to share their concerns about traffic and speeding in their neighborhoods. He thanked the members of the public that attended the Town Hall and other meetings for their feedback on improving the traffic flow in these neighborhoods. 7 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Transportation Engineer Michael Tsai reviewed the project area for the Lyon Hoag Traffic Study. He stated that the neighborhood consisted of over 14 streets and 50 intersections. Mr. Tsai reviewed the project's goals: • Engage with residents to understand concerns — formed the Citizen Advisory Panel ("CAP") made up of three members of the Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission and three residents to serve as a steering committee • Identify and study traffic -related issues • Develop effective strategies to address concerns Mr. Tsai stated that over the past two years, staff has conducted a lot of public outreach between CAP meetings and workshops with the community. These meeting were led by the City's consultants, TJKM Transportation Engineers. Mr. Tsai reviewed the community outreach that staff undertook. He stated that staff created a website for the public, conducted an online survey, and sent out postcards to those in the neighborhoods. He discussed the three workshops that staff held. He noted that each workshop had new residents and that staff received a lot of feedback. He stated that from the workshops the four common concerns that staff heard were: • Speeding • Cut -through traffic • Parking • Sight distance Mr. Tsai discussed the tools that the City could use for traffic calming: • Centerline/parking lane marking • Red curb extension • Median island • High visibility crosswalk • Speed feedback sign • Rectangular rapid flashing beacon • Road hump (trial and permanent) • Bulb -out (trial and permanent) • Traffic circle (trial and permanent) Councilmember Brownrigg noted that protected bike lanes were not included in the list of solutions. He explained that bike lanes make a road feel narrower and slow cars down. He asked why this wasn't one of the options. Mr. Tsai stated that staff is working on the Bike/Ped Master Plan. He explained that the Bike/Ped Master Plan is considering the origins, destinations, and routes that individuals would be taking through the city. He stated that in Lyon Hoag, Howard Avenue was one of the main bike routes. Mayor Beach asked Mr. Tsai to explain what the different type of bikes lanes are:: • Class One Facilities — paved rights -of -way separated from the street that is shared with pedestrians • Class Two Facilities — on -street facilities designated for bicyclists using stripes 8 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes • Class Three Facilities — streets designated for bicycle travel utilizing sharrows • Class Four Facilities — provide space that is exclusively used for bicyclists and separated from vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes, and sidewalks Mr. Tsai explained that a Class Four facility wasn't suggested because of the amount of space that is required for this type of lane. He noted that Howard Avenue could be made into a Class Two Facility as there is enough space to widen the lane from four and half feet to five and half feet. Mr. Tsai reviewed a recommended solutions map that listed where staff proposed putting in different traffic calming solutions. • High visibility crosswalk at Howard Avenue and Dwight Road. • High visibility crosswalk and bulb -outs at Howard Avenue and Anita Road • Traffic circle at Dwight Road and Vernon Way (there are temporary versions of traffic circles that could be done first) • Traffic circle at Bayswater Avenue and Bancroft Road • Bulb -outs at Burlingame Avenue and East Lane • High visibility crosswalk at Howard Avenue and Victoria Road Mr. Tsai stated that there are three different versions of bulb -outs: • Striped bulb -outs with delineators — temporary • Detached bulb -outs — semi -temporary • Full bulb -outs — most expensive option Mr. Tsai discussed other solutions including road humps. He noted that there are temporary and permanent road humps that staff could consider. Mr. Tsai reviewed implementation of the traffic calming measures. He noted that there would be three phases: Phase One (Near Term) • Low-cost solutions • Trial phase for high -cost, permanent solutions such as traffic circles and road humps • Improved striping • Cost - $930,000 to $980,000 Phase Two (Medium Term) • Medium -cost solutions • Trial phase for high -cost permanent solutions such as bulb -outs • Permanent road humps if successful in Phase I • High -cost signage • Cost - $590,000 to $620,000 9 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Phase Three (Long Term) • High -cost solutions • Permanent traffic circles and bulb -outs if successful in Phase I and Phase II • Cost - $1.7 million to $1.8 million Mayor Beach stated that at the March 13 Budget Study Session, Council approved $500,000 for Phase One improvements. She asked what projects would be prioritized in Phase I since the City wouldn't have the full funding for the first phase in FY 2020-21. Mr. Tsai stated that staff is suggesting prioritizing improvements by location, based on speed and traffic concerns. Mayor Beach asked which of the projects outlined in the presentation would move forward in Phase One. Mr. Tsai stated that the main concern is speeding. Therefore, when staff looks at the list it would be projects that provide the most benefit to that concern. He noted that staff will review what intersections have crosswalks, stop signs, etc. He added that all the suggested striping could be done at a conservative estimate of $320,000. DPW Murtuza reviewed the Phase One map that showed Dwight Road, Bloomfield, Humboldt, Howard, and Bayswater. He stated that these would be the major streets that staff would focus on in order to combat the speeding and traffic concerns. Mayor Beach asked if the area around Victoria Park would be prioritized. DPW Murtuza replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the two intersections with the weird geometry over on Rollins Road. He explained that he has heard from residents that vehicles move through those intersections too quickly. He asked what work would be done there. DPW Murtuza stated that these two intersections are included in the recommendation. He discussed bulb -outs that would be implemented to narrow down the roadway's entry points Councilmember Colson asked about the two most eastern intersections on Humboldt that were half in San Mateo. She asked if the City would need to work with San Mateo and if San Mateo would share in the cost. DPW Murtuza stated that Humboldt is shared with San Mateo and staff will need to work with San Mateo on any improvements. Councilmember Colson stated that it seemed like staff had a good grasp on the study and knew best how to prioritize improvements. Therefore, she suggested giving staff discretion in prioritizing projects. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked if staff has talked to San Mateo about their proposals for the shared intersections. Mr. Tsai stated that staff floated the idea to San Mateo, but further discussions were needed. Vice Mayor O'Brien Keighran asked what the timeline would be. DPW Murtuza stated that in the next fiscal year staff would begin planning and design of the striping. He added that it would take about six months to complete this, and then the project would be put out for bid. 10 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Councilmember Brownrigg asked why it would take so long to design road striping. DPW Murtuza stated that it isn't just the striping that will take six months. He noted that staff needs to complete field measurements, surveying, and topography. Mayor Beach stated that a resident asked her why the City isn't considering installing stop signs instead of traffic circles as a result of current budget constraints. DPW Murtuza discussed the regulations involved in installing stop signs. He noted that stop signs are not a speed control device. Mayor Beach stated that she liked the high visibility crosswalks that staff was recommending. She asked if staff would consider combining a high visibility crosswalk and a traffic circle near Victoria Park. Mr. Tsai stated that a lot of the enhanced crosswalks do have an adequately sized median. Mayor Beach opened the item up for public comment. Manito Velasco urged the City to advance as much of the low -hanging fruit projects in the plan as quickly as possible. (comment submitted via publiccommentgburlin a�g). Adrienne Leigh asked that the Lyon Hoag study be put on pause until the BPAC had a chance to review the plan. (comment submitted via publiccomment(d),burlin ag me.org). A resident asked about how the City could increase the safety of intersections that are not four-way stops. (comment submitted via Zoom Chat). DPW Murtuza stated that this type of intersection is included in the Lyon Hoag plan. He explained that these intersections would be addressed with signage, high visibility crosswalks, and striping. A resident asked about ensuring that first responders could get through the intersections. (comment submitted via Zoom chat). DPW Murtuza stated that staff coordinated with CCFD to ensure that the emergency response vehicles do not have to slow down on the road humps. Mayor Beach closed public comment. Mayor Beach noted the public's concern about the synergy between the Bike/Ped Master Plan and the Lyon Hoag Traffic Study. She stated that there has been a lot of open public meetings over the past two years on both topics. She asked how the Bike/Ped Master Plan would be incorporated into the Lyon Hoag projects. DPW Murtuza stated that the Lyon Hoag project was due to traffic and speeding complaints from the neighborhood. He noted that as part of the implementation, staff would look at recommendations from the Bike/Ped Master Plan. Councilmember Ortiz thanked all involved. He noted that it was unfortunate that budget restraints would slow down the work. Councilmember Brownrigg encouraged staff to move forward with the striping as he believed it would greatly benefit the neighbors. 11 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes Councilmember Colson concurred with her colleagues. She added that if the City runs through the $500,000, the Council could consider additional funds at the mid -year budget study session. She stated that this is something that the City needs to invest capital in. Mayor Beach stated that there has been a lot of community outreach on this project. She thanked the members of the steering committee. She concurred with her colleagues that striping would do a lot for traffic calming. She asked staff to consider temporary solutions in order to be as aggressive as the City can be with the budget it has. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution 061-2020; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS a. MAYOR BEACH'S COMMITTEE REPORT 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS There were no future agenda items. 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin ag me.org. 44. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Beach adjourned the meeting at 9:09 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 12 Burlingame City Council May 18, 2020 Approved Minutes