HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 050-2020DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
RESOLUTION NO. 50-2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN
BURLINGAME AVENUE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
The City Council (the "Council") of the City of Burlingame (the "City") finds as follows:
WHEREAS, the Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California
Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the "Act") to establish the City's
Downtown Burlingame Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project (the "Assessment District");
and
WHEREAS, the Council has, by previous resolution, ordered staff to prepare and file the
Annual Report concerning the levy and collection of assessments within the Assessment
District; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared and filed such Annual Report with the Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the Annual Report.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Approval of Report: The Council approves the Annual Report concerning the levy of
assessments as submitted for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2020 and ending June
30, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
nnaFr+�ta�apggn
Emily Beach, Mayor
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4t—" day of May,
2020 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ORTIZ
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
BEACH, BROWNRIGG, COLSON, O'BRIEN KEIGHRAN,
NONE
NONE
DocuSigned by:
_ff__ e,
8 484c3D 0
Meaghan asse -49 earer, City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
City of Burlingame Assessment District
No. 2012-1, Downtown Burlingame Avenue
Streetscape Improvement Project
Engineer's Report
City of Burlingame
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. INTRODUCTION
1-1
2-1
2.1. Background of District...................................................................................2-1
2.2. Reason for the Assessment..........................................................................2-1
2.3. Establishment of the Assessment.................................................................2-1
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
3-1
3.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District.................................................3-1
3.2. Description of the District Improvement Project............................................3-1
3.3. Map of District Improvement Project.............................................................3-1
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS 4-1
4.1. District Improvement Project Costs..............................................................4-1
5. SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT
5-1
5.1. Introduction................................................................................................... 5-1
5.2. Identification of Benefit..................................................................................5-1
5.3. Separation of General Benefit......................................................................5-3
5.4. Quantification of General Benefit..................................................................5-4
5.5. Apportioning of Special Benefit.....................................................................5-5
6. METHOD ASSESSMENT
6-1
6.1. Assessment Budget.......................................................................................6-1
6.2. Method of Assessment Spread ................ ............ .........................................6-2
6.3. District Improvement Project Debt Financing.................................................6-2
6.4. Assessment Prepayment Formula.................................................................6-3
7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
7-1
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL 8-1
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council of the City of Burlingame ("City Council"), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California ("1972 Act"),
previously formed the assessment district known and designated as "Assessment District No. 2012-1,
Downtown Burlingame Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project", (hereafter referred to as the "District').
The City Council has initiated proceedings directing the preparation and filing of a report for Fiscal Year
2020/21 presenting the improvements, an estimated cost, including debt financing, of the improvements,
annual administrative costs, and a diagram showing the area and properties to be assessed.
The following assessment is authorized in order to pay the estimated costs, including debt financing of the
improvements and annual administrative costs to be paid by the assessable real property within the
boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the
assessment:
Description
Amount
District Improvement Project Costs
$11,227,015
Less: Allocation to General Benefit(1)
(3,238,994)
Subtotal: Allocation to Special Benefit
$7,988,021
Less: Sewer and Water Enterprise Fund Contribution(2)
($922,000)
Less: TLC Grant
(301,000)
Less: Additional Contribution from Parking Enterprise Fund
(782,432)
Less: Additional City Contribution
(20,195)
Total Amount to be Specially Assessed
$5,962,394
Total Amount Pre -Paid During 30 Day Collection Period
$341,582
Annual Assessable Budget:
Average Annual Debt Service Payment(3)
$310,156
Total Annual Assessable Budget
$310,156
(1) See Section 5.4.
(2) Contemporaneously with the District Improvement Project, the City, using sewer and water
enterprise funds, replaced the sewer and water lines under Burlingame Avenue (the overall total
cost for all projects is $15,443,660). A portion of the money for that project was allocated for
patching the streets and sidewalks. Since the District Improvement Project eliminates the need
for patching, the $922,000 is being contributed to the District Improvement Project.
(3) See Section 6.3.
This annual report represents no changes to the Fiscal Year 2019/20 annual report.
/! A,
v62�
Art Morimoto
Assistant Public Works Director
City of Burlingame
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 3-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. Background of District
The City of Burlingame ("City") has completed, in coordination with planned utility improvements, the
Downtown Burlingame Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project ("District Improvement Project"). The
District Improvement Project provided an opportunity for community stakeholders to plan and implement
streetscaping and sidewalk improvements that complement the evolving vision and needs of the
Burlingame Avenue property owners, merchants and community. The District Improvement Project
improves the public infrastructure that fronts property along Burlingame Avenue (and portions of certain
side streets at intersections with Burlingame Avenue) between El Camino Real and California Drive.
Further, the District Improvement Project enhances the overall experience of merchants and visitors by
creating a memorable Burlingame Avenue for shopping, dining, and strolling.
2.2. Reason for the Assessment
The assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the assessment revenue necessary to
provide for a portion of the public improvements provided by the District Improvement Project and further
described in Section 3.2 of this Engineer's Report. The District improvements may include but are not
limited to, all of the following: streetscape improvements, sidewalk improvements, District financing costs,
and administrative costs associated with the ongoing annual administration of the District.
2.3. Establishment of the Assessment
The City formed the District and established assessments by complying with the procedures specified in
Article MID and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act ("Proposition 218"). In November 1996,
the voters in the State of California added Article MID to the California Constitution imposing, among other
requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners
of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted, the opportunity to express their
support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure
are outlined below.
The City prepared a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated
information, the reason for the proposed assessments and provided a date, time, and location of a public
hearing to be held on the matter. The City prepared an assessment ballot, which clearly gave the property
owner the ability to sign and execute their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to, the
assessment. The Notice and assessment ballots were mailed to each affected property owner within the
District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City held
community meetings with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer
property owner questions directly.
After the Notice and assessment ballots were mailed, property owners were given until the close of the
public hearing, as stated in the Notice, to return their signed and executed assessment ballot. During the
public hearing, property owners were given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions
or voice their concerns. After the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close
of the public hearing were tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and
the results were announced by the City Council.
Article MID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to
exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to enact the assessments as proposed. A majority protest
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 4-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor
of the assessment. All returned ballots were tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation
of each particular parcel. There wasn't a majority protest as described above and the City Council approved
the District formation and assessments.
The City Council will annually declare its intention to levy and collect the assessments within the District
and hold a public hearing concerning such levy of assessments. At such time all interested persons shall
be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 2-2
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for various Burlingame Avenue streetscape and sidewalk improvements located within
the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.
3.1. Description of the Boundaries of the District
The boundaries of the District include properties located along Burlingame Avenue within the City. The
District runs along Burlingame Avenue and is bounded on the east by California Drive and on the west by
El Camino Real. The City will not provide public improvements from the District Improvement Project to
any area located outside of the District boundaries.
Section 7 of this Engineer's Report provides an assessment diagram that more fully provides a description
of the District's boundaries and the parcels within those boundaries.
3.2. Description of the District Improvement Project
The District Improvement Project includes streetscape items such as sidewalk, street and pedestrian
lighting, trees and landscaping, seating, signage, kiosks, gateway treatments, site furnishings, and other
parking improvements, appurtenant facilities, and soft costs. The District Improvement Project provides for
public improvements to be distributed throughout the entire District, and as such, are of direct and special
benefit to the parcels within the District. The District Improvement Project consists of a classic design style
with touches of traditional and contemporary design. This desired design style creates a structured, timeless
design with patterned, elegant materials consistent throughout the Burlingame Avenue area.
Not only does the District Improvement Project provide necessary street improvements, but it allows for an
increase in pedestrian space along Burlingame Avenue. To allow for this additional pedestrian space,
parallel parking replaced the existing angled parking. The change from angled parking to parallel parking
will allow for an expanded 16 foot width of sidewalk area on both sides of Burlingame Avenue. This
additional sidewalk area can provide sufficient space for seating, art features, landscaping, and lighting.
Burlingame Avenue will be maintained with two-way traffic and 10 foot wide travel lanes. The parallel
parking stalls, with a parking assist zone, will have a width of nine feet. The parking assist zone allows for
car door openings and limited bike through lanes along Burlingame Avenue.
At the intersection corners along Burlingame Avenue bulb -outs are proposed to allow for additional
pedestrian areas. In addition to providing an enhanced pedestrian area, the corner intersection bulb -outs
will reduce pedestrian crossing distances. As an additional safety feature, the crosswalks will be of a
different construction material than the street surface to provide a warning for traffic to slow down.
The District Improvement Project includes asphalt paving in the roadway and colored concrete for the
parking and parking assist zones. The sidewalks, corner intersection bulb -outs and cross walks will be
constructed of concrete pavers. Trees, street lights with limited features, and other public furnishings are
also included throughout the District.
3.3. Map of District Improvement Project
The following map provides the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of the
improvements provided by the District Improvement Project throughout the District.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 3-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
6ur11ngar1F1e Hve alcreel bLilpe 1rr#prUVeHients Project - Draft Concept Plan
A
Aw
do 4
j ]Jill
I'- A-21, I.; I..: J, 1
._ r—
IT
P� +y�'y llf � .it,}•, i, ��3���� �� � �#y� .I Jill'
-e .I ;,.,'►�tiSi1�
01,
Burlingame Ave Streetscape Improvements
February 28,2012
ai:a
z
;
:r
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated cost of the District Improvement Project as more fully described in Section 3 of this
Engineer's Report is outlined below.
4.1. District Improvement Project Costs
The following table provides the costs for the District Improvement Project. Refer to Section 6 for more
detail on the financing plan and the annual assessment budget.
Description
Amount
District Improvement Project Costs
Construction
$9,709,355
Construction Management
825,660
Construction Engineering
332,000
Engineering Administration
360,000
Total District Improvement Project Costs
$11,227,015
Contemporaneously with the District Improvement Project, the City, using sewer and water enterprise
funds, replaced the sewer and water lines under Burlingame Avenue (the overall total cost for all projects
was $15,443,660). By completing the District Improvement Project in coordination with the utility
improvements, it saved significant project costs and minimize the construction impacts to property and
businesses along Burlingame Avenue. A portion of the planned utility improvement budget, $922,000, was
allocated for patching the streets and sidewalks. Since the District Improvement Project eliminates that
need for patching, the $922,000 is being contributed to the streetscape project from the sewer and water
enterprise funds and thus will not be specially assessed. Thus, overall, the District Improvement Project
was funded by state gas tax, Measure A funds, grant funds, sewer and water enterprise funds, the parking
enterprise fund, and revenues from District special assessments.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 4-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
5. SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT
5.1. Introduction
Pursuant to Article MID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the
improvements shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel
shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the improvements. Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment
districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements necessary or convenient
for providing certain public services.
Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that assessments must be levied
according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all
assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each
such lot or parcel from the improvements. "
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the
proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article MID also provides that publicly owned
properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive
no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the
areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys,
public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts, and public parkways.
Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires that the City separate the general benefit from special benefit, so
only special benefit may be assessed.
5.2. Identification of Benefit
The District Improvement Project will provide benefits to both those properties within the District boundaries
and to the community as a whole. The benefit conferred to property within the District can be grouped into
three primary benefit categories; aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefit. The three
District benefit categories are further expanded upon in each section below.
Aesthetic Benefit
The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the District Improvement
Project. The District Improvement Project will provide public street and sidewalk infrastructure
beautification throughout the District, that will enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties
within the District. Burlingame Avenue streetscape improvements within the District were last completed
back in the early 1960s. Since that time, the public facilities have deteriorated. The following aesthetic
benefits will be provided as a result of the District Improvement Project:
• The District Improvement Project enhances the community identity of the Burlingame Avenue area,
which will lead to a stronger and healthier street corridor. The image of the Burlingame Avenue
area will be increased by correcting the visual clutter such as trash containers and news racks that
currently encroach on the pedestrian area.
• Uniform and up to date streetscape and sidewalk improvements creates cohesion throughout the
District from El Camino Real to California Drive. This District cohesion enhances the retail
experience as well as encourage maximum use of space.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Upgraded streetscaping and sidewalk amenities provided by the District Improvement Project
enhances the appearance, desirability, and "livability" of the property directly fronting the
improvements provided throughout the District.
As a result of the District Improvement Project, the overall "livability" of the District increases. "Livability"
encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area. The Victoria Transport
Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org) expands on the concept of "livability" and the various benefits associated
with that designation:
"The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is
largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact
with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and
other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an
area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental
conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment,
aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources."
Safety Benefit
The District Improvement Project provides an increased level of safety to the property, businesses, and
visitors to the District. Additionally, the District Improvement Project help mitigate potential criminal activity
throughout the District area. The following safety benefits are provided as a result of the District
Improvement Project:
• The District Improvement Project repaired uneven and deteriorating sidewalks within the District.
Improvements to the existing sidewalk infrastructure will reduce the number of future trip and fall
occurrences potentially occurring in front of District property.
• The District Improvement Project provides better lighting throughout the Burlingame Avenue area.
The improved lighting ensures that sidewalks, streets, and property fronts are more visible. This
increased level of visibility reduces the opportunities for vandalism to property within the District.
• Wider sidewalks provide additional space between vehicle and property as well as vehicle and
pedestrian, which provides a safety benefit for both property and pedestrian.
• Traffic calming improvements can reduce automobile traffic and speeds, which in turn, increases
the safety for vehicular passengers, pedestrians, and other non -motorized travels.
The streetscaping strategies utilized in the development of the District Improvement Project provide
numerous safety benefits to property and people throughout the District. Again, the Victoria Transport
Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org) notes the safety benefit attributable to streetscaping improvements:
"Several studies indicate that common streetscaping strategies, such as landscaping and
narrowing traffic lanes, tend to increase traffic safety. Streetscaping that reduces traffic
speeds and improves pedestrian crossing conditions can significantly reduce collisions.
Research by the U.S. Highway Safety Research System concludes that road diets (arterial
street traffic calming) typically reduce crash rates by 47% on major highways through small
urban areas, by 19% on corridors in larger city suburban areas, and 29% overall."
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-2
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Economic Activity Benefit
The economic activity benefit relates to the increase in the District's economic activity and further potential
as a result of the District Improvement Project. The economic activity for property within the District can
best be described as the ability for the property within the District to develop and operate at the property's
highest and best use. Properties within the District receive the following economic activity benefits as a
result of the District Improvement Project:
• The District Improvement Project revitalizes the Burlingame Avenue area. This revitalization will
encourage new business development and existing business expansion which will reduce vacancy
rates and increase lease rates for property within the District.
• The streetscaping improvements encourages an increase in commerce throughout the District.
The Burlingame Avenue area will become more pedestrian friendly, thus improving customer
activity for stores and restaurants.
The streetscaping improvements not only add economic value to property adjacent to the improvements,
but the improvements make the property appear more stable and prosperous. The National Complete
Streets Coalition (www.completestreets.org) notes that:
"Street design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only
improves conditions for existing businesses, but also is a proven method for revitalizing an
area and attracting new development. Washington, DC's Barracks Row was experiencing
a steady decline of commercial activity due to uninviting sidewalks, lack of streetlights, and
speeding traffic. After many design improvements, which included new patterned
sidewalks, more efficient public parking, and new traffic signals, Barrack's Row attracted
44 new businesses and 200 new jobs. Economic activity on this three-quarter mile strip
(measured by sales, employees, and number of pedestrians) has more than tripled since
the inception of the project."
5.3. Separation of General Benefit
Section 4 of Article MID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to
impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon
them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general
benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount
of the assessments imposed.
General benefit is an overall and similar benefit to the public at large resulting from the improvements to be
provided by the assessments levied. The District improvements, which are more fully presented in Section
3.2 of this Engineer's Report, will be constructed and provided within the District boundaries only. There
will be no improvements from the District Improvement Project constructed outside of the District
boundaries.
The District Improvement Project provide aesthetic, safety, and economic benefits to the property within
the District, but it is recognized that the District Improvement Project also provides a level of benefit to some
property and businesses within proximity to the District, as well as visitors and individuals passing through
the District. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic from property within and outside of the District as well as
individual passing through the downtown Burlingame Avenue area are able to utilize the improvements to
not only access property and businesses located within a close proximity to the District, but also roadways
located outside of the District. Therefore, the general benefit created as a result of the District Improvement
Project has been considered.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-3
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
5.4. Quantification of General Benefit
In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefit received from
the District Improvement Project, the general benefit provided by the District Improvement Project needs to
be quantified. The amount of general benefit provided from the District Improvement Project can not be
assessed to the benefitting properties within the District. To quantify the general benefit provided to the
variety of traffic that passes through the District for the general benefit of enjoying the surrounding
atmosphere, observing the level of economic activity, or accessing adjacent property or arterial streets in a
more efficient and safe manner, both vehicular and pedestrian traffic flows have been incorporated in the
quantification of general benefit.
Vehicular Traffic Activity
Access to the Burlingame Avenue commercial core area is provided by major north -south arterials. Those
major arterials are El Camino Real to the west of the District and California Drive to the east of the District.
Collector streets feed traffic to these and other arterials throughout the City. As such, Burlingame Avenue
is considered a collector street within the City. In 2010, the City adopted the Burlingame Downtown Specific
Plan ("Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan included a Traffic Impact Analysis Technical Memorandum
("Traffic Analysis") prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates. This Traffic Analysis evaluated existing traffic
conditions at various points throughout the project area. One point evaluated by the consultants was
existing travel conditions at the intersection of Burlingame Avenue and Park Road. The Traffic Analysis
evaluated, among other characteristics, traffic counts, turning movement data, vehicle delay, and level of
service for each intersection. Existing conditions for the project area intersections, including the Burlingame
Avenue intersection, were evaluated during a weekday, evening peak hour timeframe. There were 664
observed traffic counts at the intersection of Burlingame Avenue and Park Road. Park Road terminates at
Burlingame Avenue requiring traffic to either turn left or right onto Burlingame Avenue. In addition to the
Traffic Analysis, information related to vehicle trips by purpose was used from the Summary of Travel
Trends 2009 National Household Travel Survey ("2009 NHTS") sponsored by the U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Of the observed 2,171 vehicle trips in the 2009 NHTS
survey, 643 trips represented social, recreational and other travel purposes; the remaining 1,425 vehicle
trips represented work, shopping and other errands. Applying this vehicle trip breakdown to the observed
traffic counts at the intersection of Burlingame Avenue and Park Road, 207 of the traffic counts represent
social, recreational, and other travel purposes not directly related to District activities but more likely utilizing
Burlingame Avenue as a collector street to feed to one of the adjacent arterial streets. This non -District
related traffic count represents approximately 31.20% of the total observed traffic counts and is considered
to be general benefit from the District Improvement Project.
Pedestrian Traffic Activity
As result of the sidewalk improvements and beautification provided by the District Improvement Project,
there is a level of benefit to those pedestrians not involved with any of the shopping, dining, or other
commerce activities provided by the District properties. People walk for a variety of reasons; work, errands,
shopping, recreation, health, and many others. Further, pedestrians will seek out and utilize sidewalk
facilities that provide a safe place to walk as well as an environmentthat provides a certain amount of visual
interest. Again, the 2009 NHTS analyzed the annual numberof walking trips and the purpose of the walking
trips made by individuals surveyed. Of the annual total 40,962 (in millions) walking trips, 30,129 of those
walking trips were for travel, work, shopping, errands, business obligations, and meals; the remaining
10,833 walking trips were for social, recreational, and other purposes. The social, recreational, and other
purpose walking trips represented 26.5% of the total walking trips reported. Therefore, to account for that
portion of the Burlingame Avenue pedestrian activity utilizing the improvements provided by the District
Improvement Project for non -District related activities, 26.50% of pedestrian traffic activity is considered to
be of general benefit.
Since the District Improvement Project provides a blend of both vehicular and pedestrian activity the two
categories must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, to appropriately
quantify the overall level of general benefit provided by the District Improvement Project the arithmetic mean
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-4
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
of the general benefit percentages from the vehicular traffic activity and the pedestrian traffic activity has
been calculated. This general benefit result is provided in the table below.
Description
Percentage
General Benefit
28.85%
Accordingly, 71.15% of the benefits from the District Improvement Project are considered to provide special
benefits to the properties within the District and thus could be subject to assessment therein.
5.5. Apportioning of Special Benefit
As outlined above, each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the
District Improvement Project. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the
District Improvement Project is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified
parcel is determined in relationship to the entire cost of the District Improvement Project.
Benefit Point Assignment
Aesthetic Benefit Points
Aesthetic benefit points are assigned based upon not only the property's location to the District
Improvement Project, but also the property's zoning designation. All District parcels are located within the
Burlingame Avenue Commercial District, which has a commercial zoning designation. Additionally, since
the District Improvement Project is provided uniformly throughout the District all properties within the District
are within the same proximity to the location of the infrastructure provided by the District Improvement
Project. Therefore, the aesthetic benefit to each parcel in the District is deemed to be the same. Each
property within the District is assigned one (1.00) benefit point for the aesthetic benefits received from the
District Improvement Project.
Safety Benefit Points
The safety benefit points are assigned based upon not only the property's location to the District
Improvement Project, but also the property's zoning designation. All District parcels are located within the
Burlingame Avenue Commercial District, which has a commercial zoning designation. Additionally, since
the District Improvement Project is provided uniformly throughout the District all properties within the District
are within the same proximity to the location of the infrastructure provided by the District Improvement
Project. Therefore, the safety benefit to each parcel in the District is deemed to be the same. Each property
within the District is assigned one (1.00) benefit point for the safety benefits received from the District
Improvement Project.
Economic Activity Benefit Points
The economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon not only the property's location to the District
Improvement Project, but also the property's zoning designation. All District parcels are located within the
Burlingame Avenue Commercial District, which has a commercial zoning designation. Additionally, since
the District Improvement Project is provided uniformly throughout the District all properties within the District
are within the same proximity to the location of the infrastructure provided by the District Improvement
Project. Therefore, the economic activity benefit to each parcel in the District is deemed to be the same.
The Burlingame Avenue Commercial District is already a well -established commercial district with a strong
economic activity presence. The Burlingame Avenue area features a mixture of restaurants, national retail
stores, and many locally based retailers. Marketing and promotional efforts to increase the economic
presence of an expanded area that includes the District boundaries is currently being funded by the
Burlingame Avenue Downtown Business Improvement District ("DBID"). In an effort to increase the
economic presence, business owners within the DBID pay an annual assessment to fund various activities
that aid in the promotion, advertising and image building of the businesses within the DBID boundaries.
Existing marketing and promotional activities throughout the District area have resulted in higher tenant
lease rates. According to Loopnet.com on March 23, 2012, the average lease rate along Burlingame
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-5
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Avenue was approximately 45% higher than the average lease rate along the City's Broadway Avenue,
another commercial area. Retail sales are also strong within the District, according to City Economic
Development data, with sales per square foot generally ranging from $300 to $800+ per square foot.
Further, there were a few new buildings constructed in the downtown around the time of formation of the
District and several major remodels of existing buildings to accommodate new retail uses generally limited
to tenant improvements. Given this already existing strong economic activity presence throughout the
District, as well as the potential for property to further develop and enhance their economic presence, each
property within the District is assigned one-half (0.50) benefit point for the economic activity benefits
received from the District Improvement Project.
The following table provides a summary of the special benefit points assigned to each parcel within the
District.
Aesthetic
Safety
Economic
Parcel Land Use
Benefit Point
Benefit Point
Activity Benefit
Classification
Assignment
Assignment
Point Assignment
All District Parcels
1.00
1.00
0.50
Parcel Factors
The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special
benefit assigned to each property from the District Improvement Project based upon the various property
characteristics for each parcel as compared to other properties within the District. As part of the special
benefit analysis, various property characteristics were analyzed including parcel size, street frontage,
building size, land use, trip generation etc. Given that the special benefits provided by the District
Improvement Project focuses on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits it was
determined that linear frontage and lot square footage are the most appropriate parcel factors. Each
parcel's linear frontage and lot square footage have been used as the primary assessment variables for the
calculation and assignment of parcel factors.
By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture
of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel from the District Improvement Project is
presented. Therefore, linear and lot parcel factors were calculated for each parcel in the District according
to the formulas below:
Linear Factor
Pursuant to Section 25.32.050 of the City's Zoning Code for the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District,
each lot shall have a street frontage of at least 50 feet. Utilizing the prescribed street frontage as set forth
in the City's Zoning code, a linear factor is calculated for each parcel based upon the assigned linear
frontage for the parcel divided by 50.00:
Linear Factor
-
Parcel's Assigned
/
50.00
Linear Street Frontage
There are several parcels located at street intersections within the District. The District Improvement
Project partially extends along the side streets at these intersections with Burlingame Avenue. To account
for the partial extension of the District Improvement Project at each street intersection, the side street linear
frontage of the improvement has been added to each corner parcel to account for this increased linear
frontage adjacent to the District Improvement Project.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 - City of Burlingame 5-6
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Lot Factor
Pursuant to Section 25.32.050 of the City's Zoning Code for the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District,
each lot shall have an area of at least 5,000 square feet. Utilizing the prescribed lot square footage as set
forth in the City's Zoning code, a lot factor is calculated for each parcel based upon the assigned lot square
footage for the parcel divided by 5,000:
Lot Factor
=
Parcel's Assigned
/
5,000
Lot Square Footage
Total Special Benefit Point Calculation
Parcel's Total
Parcel's Total
Parcel's Total
Parcel's Total Economic
Special Benefit
-
Aesthetics Points
+
Safety Points
+
Activity Points
Points
Parcel's Total Aesthetic Points
The District Improvement Project, as well as the store and property fronts that are adjacent to those linear
improvements provide an enhanced level of interest and "curb appeal" that add to the overall experience
along Burlingame Avenue. Since the improvements and furnishings are uniform throughout the District,
the "curb appeal" is consistent for the front of each parcel located within the District. Additionally, the
uniform landscaping aids in softening the surrounding edges of each parcel's front exposure to the District
Improvement Project by adding life, color, and texture to the property's appearance, and overall pedestrian
experience. Given the linear nature of the aesthetic benefits provided by the District Improvement Project,
the aesthetic benefit that each property receives is also perceived on a linear basis. To appropriately
quantify and assign the aesthetic benefit received by each parcel within the District, the aesthetic benefit
point is further adjusted according to the formula below:
Parcel's Total
_
Aesthetic Benefit
x
Linear Factor
Aesthetic Points
Points Assigned
Parcel's Total Safety Points
The District Improvement Project provides enhanced lines of travel and sight along Burlingame Avenue,
which increases the level of safety by mitigating potential accidents and crime by having the additional
exposure to property and traffic. The lighting improvements also increase the visual sight line by providing
additional exposure to property fronts, especially during the evening hours. This additional exposure
reduces the potential for crime and vandalism to the front of property throughout the District. Further, the
sidewalk and parking zone along Burlingame Avenue provides a buffer for traffic and the property frontage.
Again, given the linear nature of the safety benefits provided by the District Improvement Project, the safety
benefit that each property receives is also perceived on a linear basis. To appropriately quantify and assign
the safety benefit received by each parcel within the District, the safety benefit point is further adjusted
according to the formula below:
Parcel's Total
_
Safety Benefit
x
Linear Factor
Safety Points
Points Assigned
Parcel's Total Economic Activity Points
The District Improvement Project creates a more pedestrian friendly and inviting Burlingame Avenue
environment that supports and encourages additional commerce activity throughout the District. The
improvements allow parcels within the District to develop and redevelop to their highest and best use in
accordance with City zoning and development regulations. However, the one limiting property
characteristic that constrains a parcel from developing to the highest and best use is the size of the parcel
itself. The size of a parcel limits the amount of development and redevelopment that may occur on the
footprint of the parcel. Larger parcels allow for greater area to develop and redevelop than do smaller
Assessment District No. 2012-1 - City of Burlingame 5-7
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionally greater economic activity benefit when
compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the economic activity benefit for parcels in the
District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel. Since the economic activity benefits are in direct
relation to the size of a parcel, then the economic activity benefits provided by the District Improvement
Project is also perceived on a parcel size basis. To appropriately quantify and assign the economic activity
benefit received by each parcel within the District, the economic activity benefit point is further adjusted
according to the formula below:
Parcel's Total Economic
_
Economic Activity
x
Lot Factor
Activity Points
Benefit Points Assigned
Data Considerations and Parcel Changes
The use of the latest San Mateo County Assessor's Secured Roll information served as the basis in
determining each parcel's linear frontage and lot square footage, unless better data was available to the
City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the San Mateo County Auditor/Controller to
be an invalid parcel number, the linear frontage and lot square footage of the subsequent valid parcel shall
be the basis for assigning the future total special benefit points. If a single parcel subdivides into multiple
parcels, the total special benefit points shall be apportioned based on the linear frontage and lot square
footage of the newly created parcels.
Total Special Benefit Points
The total special benefit points assigned to the parcels at formation of the District were 183.28. The
following table provides a breakdown of the total special benefit point assignment for each parcel in the
District:
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 5-8
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
ID
Aesthetic
Benefit
Points
Safety
Benefit
Points
Economic
Activity
Benefit Points
Linear
Frontage
Linear
Factor
Lot
Square
Footage
Lot
Factor
Total
Aesthetic
Benefit
Points
Total
Safety
Benefit
Points
Total Economic
Activity Benefit
Points
Total
Special
Benefit
Points
029-122-190
1*
1.00
1.00
0.50
70.00
1.40
2,123
0.42
1.40
1.40
0.21
3.01
029-122-220
2
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.50
1.01
10,776
2.16
1.01
1.01
1.08
3.10
029-122-230
3
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
10,286
2.06
1.00
1.00
1.03
3.03
029-122-240
4
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
9,791
1.96
1.00
1.00
0.98
2.98
029-122-250
5
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
9,971
1.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
029-122-260
6
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.10
1.00
6,195
1.24
1.00
1.00
0.62
2.62
029-122-270
7
1.00
1.00
0.50
49.90
1.00
13,897
2.78
1.00
1.00
1.39
3.39
029-122-280
8
1.00
1.00
0.50
55.00
1.10
10,879
2.18
1.10
1.10
1.09
3.29
029-122-330
9
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
6,829
1.37
1.00
1.00
0.69
2.69
029-122-360
10
1.00
1.00
0.50
116.00
2.32
16,786
3.36
2.32
2.32
1.68
6.32
029-122-999
11
1.00
1.00
0.50
147.00
2.94
28,296
5.66
2.94
2.94
2.83
8.71
029-152-110
12
1.00
1.00
0.50
80.00
1.60
5,748
1.15
1.60
1.60
0.58
3.78
029-152-120
13
1.00
1.00
0.50
25.00
0.50
2,853
0.57
0.50
0.50
0.29
1.29
029-152-160
14
1.00
1.00
0.50
60.00
1.20
9,596
1.92
1.20
1.20
0.96
3.36
029-152-190
15*
1.00
1.00
0.50
65.00
1.30
8,134
1.63
1.30
1.30
0.82
3.42
029-152-200
16
1.00
1.00
0.50
65.82
1.32
8,237
1.65
1.32
1.32
0.83
3.47
029-152-210
17
1.00
1.00
0.50
60.00
1.20
7,200
1.44
1.20
1.20
0.72
3.12
029-152-220
18
1.00
1.00
0.50
41.57
0.83
4,988
1.00
0.83
0.83
0.50
2.16
029-152-230
19
1.00
1.00
0.50
65.00
1.30
6,000
1.20
1.30
1.30
0.60
3.20
029-152-270
20
1.00
1.00
0.50
60.00
1.20
7,508
1.50
1.20
1.20
0.75
3.15
029-152-310
21*
1.00
1.00
0.50
60.00
1.20
8,322
1.66
1.20
1.20
0.83
3.23
029-152-320
22
1.00
1.00
0.50
104.58
2.09
27,590
5.52
2.09
2.09
2.76
6.94
029-152-330
23
1.00
1.00
0.50
75.00
1.50
8,572
1.71
1.50
1.50
0.86
3.86
029-153-090
24
1.00
1.00
0.50
91.50
1.83
3,726
0.75
1.83
1.83
0.38
4.04
029-153-120
25
1.00
1.00
0.50
88.33
1.77
3,781
0.76
1.77
1.77
0.38
3.92
029-153-150
26
1.00
1.00
0.50
95.50
1.91
10,347
2.07
1.91
1.91
1.04
4.86
029-201-030
27
1.00
1.00
0.50
40.00
0.80
5,000
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.50
2.10
029-201-040
28
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
6,250
1.25
1.00
1.00
0.63
2.63
029-201-060
29
1.00
1.00
0.50
108.08
2.16
14,823
2.96
2.16
2.16
1.48
5.80
029-201-070
30*
1.00
1.00
0.50
54.00
1.08
9,069
1.81
1.08
1.08
0.91
3.67
029-201-080
31
1.00
1.00
0.50
54.08
1.08
9,643
1.93
1.08
1.08
0.97
3.13
029-201-100
32
1.00
1.00
0.50
50.00
1.00
3,750
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.38
2.38
029-201-110
33
1.00
1.00
0.50
86.00
1.72
3,750
0.75
1.72
1.72
0.38
3.82
029-201-320
34
1.00
1.00
0.50
159.39
3.19
13,316
2.66
3.19
3.19
1.33
7.71
029-201-360
35
1.00
1.00
0.50
100.00
2.00
18,000
3.60
2.00
2.00
1.80
5.80
029-201-370
36
1.00
1.00
0.50
25.00
0.50
3,125
0.63
0.50
0.50
0.32
1.32
029-201-380
37
1.00
1.00
0.50
25.00
0.50
3,125
0.63
0.50
0.50
0.32
1.32
029-202-010
38
1.00
1.00
0.50
136.00
2.72
12,675
2.54
2.72
2.72
1.27
6.71
029-202-020
39
1.00
1.00
0.50
60.50
1.21
7,086
1.42
1.21
1.21
0.71
3.13
Assessment District No. 2012-1 - City of Burlingame 5-9
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
ID
Aesthetic
Benefit
Points
Safety
Benefit
Points
Economic
Activity
Benefit Points
Linear
Frontage
Linear
Factor
Lot
Square
Footage
Lot
Factor
Total
Aesthetic
Benefit
Points
Total
Safety
Benefit
Points
Total Economic
Activity Benefit
Points
Total
Special
Benefit
Points
029-202-030
40*
1.00
1.00
0.50
25.00
0.50
2,552
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.26
1.26
029-202-040
41
1.00
1.00
0.50
25.00
0.50
2,403
0.48
0.50
0.50
0.24
1.24
029-202-080
42
1.00
1.00
0.50
75.06
1.50
4,453
0.89
1.50
1.50
0.45
3.45
029-202-090
43
1.00
1.00
0.50
51.24
1.02
4,770
0.95
1.02
1.02
0.48
2.52
029-204-030
44
1.00
1.00
0.50
55.00
1.10
5,500
1.10
1.10
1.10
0.55
2.75
029-204-040
45
1.00
1.00
0.50
45.00
0.90
4,500
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.45
2.25
029-204-050
46
1.00
1.00
0.50
45.00
0.90
4,500
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.45
2.25
029-204-060
47
1.00
1.00
0.50
94.00
1.88
5,850
1.17
1.88
1.88
0.59
4.35
029-204-270
48
1.00
1.00
0.50
116.50
2.33
8,100
1.62
2.33
2.33
0.81
5.47
029-211-010
49
1.00
1.00
0.50
103.33
2.07
4,417
0.88
2.07
2.07
0.44
4.58
029-211-260
50
1.00
1.00
0.50
169.00
3.38
15,400
3.08
3.38
3.38
1.54
8.30
Totals:
1
50.00
1 50.00
25.00
3,527.93
70.56
420,488
84.13
70.56
70.56
42.16
183.28
* Indicates assessment has been prepaid.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 - City of Burlingame 5-10
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
6. METHOD ASSESSMENT
6.1. Assessment Budaet
In order to assess the parcels within the District for the special benefits received from the District
Improvement Project, the general and special benefits must be separated. As previously quantified in
Section 5.4 of this Engineer's Report, the general benefit received from the District Improvement Project is
28.85%. Accordingly, 71.15% of the benefits from the District Improvement Project are considered to
provide special benefits to the properties within the District and thus could be subject to assessment therein.
However, as shown below, because of contributions from various funds available to the City, including the
sewer, water, and parking enterprise funds, Measure A funds, and grant funds, only 53.11 % of the District
Improvement Project costs are being specially assessed. Reducing the District Improvement Project costs
by these contributions, the total District Improvement Project costs to be specially assessed are as follows:
Description
Amount
Total Net District Improvement Project Costs
$11,227,015
Less: General Benefit Contribution (28.85%)
(3,238,994)
Subtotal — Portion of Budget Assessable for Special Benefit
$7,988,021
Less: Sewer and Water Enterprise Fund Contribution
($922,000)
Less: TLC Grant
(301,000)
Less: Additional Contribution from Parking Enterprise Fund
(782,432)
Less: Additional City Contribution
(20,195)
Total District Improvement Project Costs Assessed for Special Benefit(1)
$5,962,394
Total Amount Pre -Paid During 30 Day Collection Period
$341,582
Annual Assessable Budget:
Average Annual Debt Service Payment for District Improvement Project Costs
$310,156
Total Annual Assessable Budget
$310,156
(1) $5,620,812 of the District Improvement Project costs have been financed over a period of 30 years.
The City issued bonds for the total District Improvement Project costs assessed for special benefit and will
use the assessment revenues to repay the bonds, over a period of 30 years, for the District's portion of that
cost, $5,620,812, plus the City's estimated financing and interest costs. Section 6.3 of this Engineer's
Report provides the basis of the average annual debt service payment used to establish the annual
assessments.
Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point
The assessment rate per special benefit point is calculated by dividing the total annual assessable budget
by the total special benefit points assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the
assessment rate per special benefit point calculation:
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 6-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Total Annual Assessable Budget / Total Special Benefit Points =
Assessment Rate per Special Benefit Point
$310,156 / 169.29 = $1,832.10
The total amount of financed District Improvement Project costs, which has been determined to provide
special benefit to parcels within the District, will be assessed over a period of 30 years. The individual
assessments are shown on the assessment roll in Section 8 of this Engineer's Report.
6.2. Method of Assessment Spread
The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefit to each parcel, with
special benefit points being adjusted by parcel linear and lot factors. The formulas below provide a
summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District.
(A) Parcel's
Total Aesthetic
= Parcel's Assigned Aesthetic
Points
Benefit Points (1.00)
(B) Parcel's
Total Safety
= Parcel's Assigned
Points
Safety Benefit Points (1.00)
Parcel's Total Economic = Parcel's Assigned Economic
Activity Points Activity Benefit Points (0.50)
(D) _
Parcel's Assigned
Linear Factor
Linear Frontage
(E) _
Parcel's Assigned
Lot Factor
Lot Square Footage
(F) Parcel's (A) (B)
Total Special = Parcel's Total + Parcel's Total
Benefit Points Aesthetics Points Safety Points
Parcel's Annual _ Assessment Rate:
Assessment $1,832.10 x
x (D)
Linear Factor
x (D)
Linear Factor
x ( Lot Factor
/ 50.00
/ 5,000
(C)
+ Parcel's Total Economic
Activity Points
(F) Parcel's
Total Special
Benefit Points
6.3. District Improvement Project Debt Financing
The $5,620,812 portion of District Improvement Project costs assessed to property within the District has
been financed over a period of 30 years. In addition to the amount of financed District Improvement Project
costs, any financing costs related to the issuance of debt such as the cost of issuance, original issue
discount, and contingencies were included as part of the total amount financed. The City has calculated
the annual assessment based on its costs of financing the District's portion of the District Improvement
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 6-2
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Project assessed for special benefit costs over a 30 year period, and has determined that it requires an
annual assessment amount of $310,156 from the District. The difference between the original estimated
financing costs and the actual financing costs will not affect the annual assessments shown in this
Engineer's Report.
6.4. Assessment Prepayment Formula
Assessment Prepayment Formula During the 30 Days Following District Formation
In the 30 days after the formation of the District, property owners had the option to prepay and permanently
satisfy their portion of the total District Improvement Project costs assessed for special benefit, without
interest, and without financing costs, according to the following formula:
Total District
Parcel's 30 Day _ Improvement Project
Prepayment Amount Costs Assessed for
Special Benefit
Parcel's 30 Day _
Prepayment Amount - $4,475,000
Parcel's Total
x ( Special
Benefit Points
Parcel's Total
x ( Special
Benefit Points
District's Total
Special )
Benefit Points
183.28 )
Assessment Prepayment Formula After the 30 Day Period Following District Formation
Property owners within the District may prepay and permanently satisfy their entire portion (no partial
prepayments) of the total annual assessment of an assessor's parcel, provided that a prepayment may be
made only if there are no delinquent assessments with respect to such assessor's parcel at the time of
prepayment. An owner of an assessor's parcel intending to prepay the ongoing annual assessment
obligation shall provide the City with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such
written notice, the City shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such assessor's parcel. The
assessment prepayment amount shall be calculated by the following steps:
Step 1: Compute the special benefit points that could be assigned to the assessor's parcel prepaying the
annual assessment obligation in the fiscal year in which the prepayment would be received by the City.
Step 2: Divide the special benefit points computed pursuant to Step 1 for such assessor's parcel by the
total special benefit points that could be assigned in that fiscal year to property in the entire District.
Step 3: Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to Step 2 by the total annual assessment to compute that
portion of the total annual assessment to be prepaid ("Parcel's Annual Assessment Amount").
Step 4: Calculate the revenue stream produced by the Parcel's Annual Assessment Amount from the date
of prepayment up to and including the maturity date of the District, June 30, 2042, except that this assumed
final maturity date may be amended by the City no later than the time of the calculation of the prepayment.
Step 5: Calculate the present value of the annual revenue stream determined in Step 4. The present value
shall be calculated using that discount rate which, when the prepayment is invested in City approved
available investments earning a rate of interest equal to the discount rate, would produce annual revenues
equal to the amount calculated in Step 4.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 - City of Burlingame 6-3
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
Step 6: Determine the prepayment amount by adding to the present value calculated in Step 5 any fees or
expenses incurred by the City in connection with the prepayment calculation or the application of the
proceeds of the prepayment.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 6-4
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each
lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor
of the County of San Mateo, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein
and made part of this Engineer's Report.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 7-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
CITY OF BURLINGAME
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2012-1
DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME AVENUE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ASSESSMENT ID APN
1 029-122-190
2 02912z-220
3 029-122-230
4 029-122-240
5 029.122-250
6 029-122-260
7 029-122-270
8 029-122-280
9 029-122-330
10 029-12.2-360
11 029.122-999
12 029-152-110
13 029-152-120
14 029-152-160
15 029-152-190
16 029-152-200
17 029-152-210
18 029-152-220
19 029-152-230
20 029-152-270
21 029-152-310
22 029-152-320
23 029-152-330
24 029-153-090
25 029-153-120
26 029-153-150
27 029.201-030
28 029-201-040
29 029-201-060
30 029-201-070
31 029201-080
32 029201-100
33 029.201.110
34 029-201-320
35 029-201-360
36 029201-370
37 029201-380
38 029202-010
39 029202-020
40 029202-030
41 029.202-040
42 029-202-060
43 029-202-070
44 029204-030
45 029204-040
46 029204-050
47 029204-060
48 029204-270
49 0z9.211-010
50 029-211-260
QNBS' Legend
:.EnS T-x- d., 0,m 10C. T,..,..l, C.592.i52 0 120 240 480 720 O PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY
li IM NEI fill: �:,16j Fn'!I!,1 e..Ii 1' IYx3ri 11
Feel O PARCEL LINES
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME THIS DAY OF , 2012.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AN ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME ON THE LOTS, PIECES AND PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN
ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. THE ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON
THE DAY OF , 2012. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE
ASSESSMENT ROLL RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR THE EXACTAMOUNT OF EACH
ASSESSMENT LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN ON
THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, THIS DAY OF 2012.
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
FILEDTHIS DAY OF, 2012, AT THE HOUR OF
O'CLOCK _M, IN BOOK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTSAT PAGE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA-
COUNTY RECORDER
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NOTES: FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF
ASSESSORS PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE
ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO.
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last
equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Mateo. The following table summarizes the
assessments for the District for Fiscal Year 2020/21:
Total
Property Land
Parcel
Special Benefit
Allowable Annual
Total Annual
Use Type
Count
Points
Assessment
Assessment
All Parcels
45
169.29
$1,832.10 per special
$310,156
benefit point
Total
45
169.29
$310,156
The assessment roll is a listing of the District assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on
the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Mateo. The assessment roll for the District is
listed on the following page.
Assessment District No. 2012-1 — City of Burlingame 8-1
Fiscal Year 2020/21
DocuSign Envelope ID: OA81F7C7-15BB-494E-AAE4-9COOF35A14FE
City of Burlingame
City of Burlingame Assessment District No. 2012-1
Downtown Burlingame Avenue Streetscape Improvement Project
Fiscal Year 2020/21 Assessment Roll
Assessor's Parcel Assessment Total Special Annual
Number ID Site Address Benefit Points Assessment(1)
029-122-220
2
1420 BURLINGAME AVE
3.10
$5,679.51
029-122-230
3
1426 BURLINGAME AVE
3.03
5,551.26
029-122-240
4
1436 BURLINGAME AVE
2.98
5,459.66
029-122-250
5
1442 BURLINGAME AVE
3.00
5,496.30
029-122-260
6
1448 BURLINGAME AVE
2.62
4,800.10
029-122-270
7
1460 BURLINGAME AVE
3.39
6,210.82
029-122-280
8
1462 BURLINGAME AVE
3.29
6,027.61
029-122-330
9
1408 BURLINGAME AVE
2.69
4,928.35
029-122-360
10
1490 BURLINGAME AVE
6.32
11,578.87
029-122-999
11
1476-80 BURLINGAME AVE
8.71
15,957.59
029-152-110
12
1200 BURLINGAME AVE
3.78
6,925.34
029-152-120
13
1208 BURLINGAME AVE
1.29
2,363.41
029-152-160
14
1232 BURLINGAME AVE
3.36
6,155.86
029-152-200
16
1316 BURLINGAME AVE
3.47
6,357.39
029-152-210
17
1348 BURLINGAME AVE
3.12
5,716.15
029-152-220
18
1354 BURLINGAME AVE
2.16
3,957.34
029-152-230
19
1380 BURLINGAME AVE
3.20
5,862.72
029-152-270
20
1300 BURLINGAME AVE
3.15
5,771.12
029-152-320
22
1218 BURLINGAME AVE
6.94
12,714.77
029-152-330
23
1210 BURLINGAME AVE
3.86
7,071.91
029-153-090
24
1100 BURLINGAME AVE
4.04
7,401.68
029-153-120
25
1150-60 BURLINGAME AVE
3.92
7,181.83
029-153-150
26
1108-18 BURLINGAME AVE
4.86
8,904.01
029-201-030
27
1471 BURLINGAME AVE
2.10
3,847.41
029-201-040
28
1461 BURLINGAME AVE
2.63
4,818.42
029-201-060
29
1435 BURLINGAME AVE
5.80
10,626.18
029-201-080
31
1423 BURLINGAME AVE
3.13
5,734.47
029-201-100
32
1407 BURLINGAME AVE
2.38
4,360.40
029-201-110
33
1401 BURLINGAME AVE
3.82
6,998.62
029-201-320
34
1479-91 BURLINGAME AVE
7.71
14,125.49
029-201-360
35
1417 BURLINGAME AVE
5.80
10,626.18
029-201-370
36
1453 BURLINGAME AVE
1.32
2,418.37
029-201-380
37
1451 BURLINGAME AVE
1.32
2,418.37
029-202-010
38
1375 BURLINGAME AVE
6.71
12,293.39
029-202-020
39
1325 BURLINGAME AVE
3.13
5,734.47
029-202-040
41
1315 BURLINGAME AVE
1.24
2,271.80
029-202-080
42
1301 BURLINGAME AVE
3.45
6,375.71
029-202-090
43
1309 BURLINGAME AVE
2.52
4,561.93
029-204-030
44
1221 BURLINGAME AVE
2.75
5,038.28
029-204-040
45
1213 BURLINGAME AVE
2.25
4,122.23
029-204-050
46
1207 BURLINGAME AVE
2.25
4,122.23
029-204-060
47
1205 BURLINGAME AVE
4.35
7,969.64
029-204-270
48
1227 BURLINGAME AVE
5.47
10,021.59
029-211-010
49
1101 BURLINGAME AVE
4.58
8,391.02
029-211-260
50
1111 BURLINGAME AVE
8.30
15,206.43
TOTALS:
169.29
$310,156.23
(1) Difference due to rounding.
Page 1 of 1