Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 097-2000RESOLUTION NO. - 97-2000 2000 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM CITY PROJECT NO. 8008 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the 2000 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - CITY PROJECT NO. 8008; and WHEREAS, on AUGUST 24, 2000, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, B-1 ENTERPRISE CORPORATION, submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of $487,351.73. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of B-1 ENTERPRISE CORPORATION for said project in the amount of $487,351.73, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor and materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the award of this contract is conditioned on the following: Before the Director of Public Works issues a Notice to Proceed on this project, the Director shall confirm that B-1 Enterprise has paid the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement judgment in State Case No. 40-04459, and if that judgment has not been satisfied by October 23, 2000, this award of contract shall be of no further force and effect and the contract shall be terminated. Mayor I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of September, 2000, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNFY, SPINF.LLI,, NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: n70;gE O' MAHONY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 14idL J--%� City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80080\ResolutuAwud.wpd 21i E^ J m A .a ... A I W N+ 000 Z a AAAA 0 SA 2i22 Zy g mmmm � 3 3 0 0 VOiNN40i e$. x o O N 3 F A A v 3 +O m A W — W N+ O Z a " 0 SA E 3 y 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 � s x O N 3 F A A M P, =1 y O p e W_ 2 A A 3 m_ m D D O 2 n A -i A AAA A w d R S O w F D 3°nm's?cNmb(Jri 3°�>aamm+Nm + 3Onyny=��yKi r N u O V V+ N A r O �mymrm �O m OTC1 'OTT V D A m N N$ A N J Z H 000' SoaoSo o J + ONI N m W N H+ m J S NW W N O A A V Ow A 888$$$ a" H 0 H+ N N m o. NHo�wN om0 000000 Wm m m � O N +maim N J+ N N N V N W O N O O O N O m S S OO N J S N IF N O P.O H P.A N M O 880 N O N N N H+ + V W 1HD 4w m W O J O O S m O m N W N O N N S O S 8 8 O N (W11�NNNN oo�wmm N + oo$000 Yq N �OpINW A N N V O O O Y O N W A N A O S D S S q S O + N N$04H1 $00000 N IV N W0 O q pANON10 NOON�DO U O O O 0 0 O N 0 0 O p 0 0 m m J m N A W N+ O O 3 M P, =1 2 A A 3 m_ m D D O 2 n A XI S A AAA A d R S F w F 3°nm's?cNmb(Jri 3°�>aamm+Nm 0>mssNWAmT 3Onyny=��yKi a i1 nnmm3N� °3<maEamn�0WbNN WO -Sam IF -DrzoCTA�3mH1 Om ffyDO" Obm O 1 m000,o,n TTToOm0 _2___ Z:"71 _T y W HH O C o°iHH H N HwN z r W S O S O O H U W H J N yy 'PRN N m N p N H H A m i O $$$S$$882'.800$$$88a$ O O W O N m N N W O O� 0 A N J J mo. m� �m N N ON OOH+++NYON�NJAV10 W m N {{qq++NANA JfJJm Dm �j0� W 00200$00+N(Ni100$$O00m p T O Oq $HSH O$$ $ONS $ 0 0 0 0$ 0 2 2 w ( N N H � A $$o _ go�SooOuHi H N_ �i$SY�rouuwi�m pgQQ y �' n $S0 o00oo0 0o 00000000 000.... 0 000o in 0 P m y mo m A'T (yyqq HN mOO Nx.!2p+Wyk NtHO�V1i�N0(Vll DDO m m so0'0 S OO O oo00>�nmi OOOOJ1mp41OO aa.'o m� v O A $ S S S S O S O S A S S pp. 888 S P. O O S H H H H 2 J PHH H H.'H�pp --1 S S N O H O N w N H O O N bI N H H A 0 S S 00410+OOWO S S S S S S S S r S S$ OOANm S S S S N Oma O D N O Ll FD 50 zm yN oO Y H Jdy1 y1 HNH+ y1WN+WHV H�(p��+NNN A NAP y ti OSOSOSO$VmA$$$$SINi�N n+1 yA A S S S S S S S S S A S 8 S 8 S S S O S H F H 2 00001H0oH .1 im-Ni00oin u 1H.lm�m P 00oo 00000.00.000.0.o00o 0000000 o00000 oin m y za �T 0 DO yp� MO A N Ab O m H (q VOIJN<NT +N BOO JN �NyV rD O VAA VAwA OO 0oOO ONOO O NN pN mm N N 00 0000 00W0 00O AJ 0 00o0 0 OOS 00OOOOOoO = W0O m H+ A (q O O O O O O+ O O O O O W+ N O J N.. O O O J O N O N H O .6.. N H W H y OOO0000.0�0�0(11�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 O.... 0 0. IDA 0 0. .NL Z � 3 0 y0 H N Oy S N {q Y� H T p AH+N H H N Y O. •p H H R H N+ H N N +ANN + rD J 8m 8S000OOONbf�ilON pp y O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O m m O O N O O O S$ S S UPS O O O 54 N F2�jC 1SCO God r 1 1 S B f VICINITY sl - PROJECT LOCATION --�' POSSIBLE ADDITION 13AY CITY OF BURLINGAME SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA REVISED: 118 196�i GRAPHIC SUI SAN MATEO COUNTY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL 1153 CHESS DRIVE 1206, POSTER CITY, CA 94404(650) 358-9977 Fax: (650) 358.9979 Millwrights 102 Operating Engineers 3 Attachment I: Source Document Review from the City of Oxnard, done Painters 913 by independent contractor Quality Consulting. The text of the report is five pages, with attachments showing specifics of financial findings. The document Pile Drivers, 34 is very important. It shows Equality Consulting found B-1 Enterprise guilty of Plasterers, 66 Plumbers 8 Sfeamfittern 467 prevailing wage violations' specifically: "None of the B-1 Enterprise employees working on this project were paid prevailing wages", and "records lack Roofers 40 credibility and do not reflect a true picture of day and hours worked..." Roofers 95 Service Employees 715 Attachment 2: Letter from Roger D. Miller, Senior Deputy, State of Sheet Metal Workers, 104 California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Sprinkler Fitters 483 Enforcement, Bureau of Field Enforcement, Public Works. This letter states that Sign BDisplay 510 there was a case brought against B-1 Enterprise by the State of California over Teamsters 853 the project in Oxnard. Unfortunately, it is our understanding this case was filed prior to the present administration at the State Labor Commissioner's office, and this case was settled short of a hearing for a substantial amount of money paid Affiliated with: by B-1 Enterprise to Oxnard without admitting guilt. It is my belief that if this State Building i Cf Califotion rnia case were filed today, no such agreement would be reached. Trades Council of Califomla September 5, 2000 Williams A Nack Business Manager Executive officer !' The Honorable Rosalie O'Mahoney;j�",�F_,;, h t„ City of Burlingame Michael G.Knab President 501 Primrose Road SEP 0 6 2000 Burlingame, CA 94010 Asbestos Workers 16 t)EI'T. Cr PL -Li;; V4U M3 Boilermakers 549 Dear Mayor O'Mahoney: CITY OF BURLINGAME Brick 8 TBC Layers 3 Cabinetmakers 2236 In reviewing the agenda for the City Council Jnecting scheduled for tonight, Carpenters 217 September 5, 2000, Item E on the Consent Calendar is a resolution awarding a carpet-r3noleum rayers 12 contract to B-1 Enterprise Corporation for Sidewalk Maintenance. Cement Masons 583 Drywall s rather, 9144 I have a number of documents that I believe will show B-1 Enterprise should not Electrical Workers 617 be considered a "responsible bidder" for contracts awarded. Based on this Elevator Constructors 8 information, I would like to request that this item be removed from the Calendar Glaziers 718 until such time that you have had an opportunity to review these documents. Hardwood Floor Layers 1861 Specifically, I am attaching: Iron Workers, 377 Millwrights 102 Operating Engineers 3 Attachment I: Source Document Review from the City of Oxnard, done Painters 913 by independent contractor Quality Consulting. The text of the report is five pages, with attachments showing specifics of financial findings. The document Pile Drivers, 34 is very important. It shows Equality Consulting found B-1 Enterprise guilty of Plasterers, 66 Plumbers 8 Sfeamfittern 467 prevailing wage violations' specifically: "None of the B-1 Enterprise employees working on this project were paid prevailing wages", and "records lack Roofers 40 credibility and do not reflect a true picture of day and hours worked..." Roofers 95 Service Employees 715 Attachment 2: Letter from Roger D. Miller, Senior Deputy, State of Sheet Metal Workers, 104 California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Sprinkler Fitters 483 Enforcement, Bureau of Field Enforcement, Public Works. This letter states that Sign BDisplay 510 there was a case brought against B-1 Enterprise by the State of California over Teamsters 853 the project in Oxnard. Unfortunately, it is our understanding this case was filed prior to the present administration at the State Labor Commissioner's office, and this case was settled short of a hearing for a substantial amount of money paid Affiliated with: by B-1 Enterprise to Oxnard without admitting guilt. It is my belief that if this State Building i Cf Califotion rnia case were filed today, no such agreement would be reached. Trades Council of Califomla September 5, 2000 Page 2 Attachment 3: Letter from Juan Garza, Deputy Labor Commissioner, State of California, stating that a child labor citation against B-1 Enterprise was assessed on a job they were doing in the City of Sunnyvale. B-1 Enterprise appealed this citation to the Labor Commissioner and was heard on July 19, 1999. The Labor Commissioner's Office ruled B-1 Enterprise was guilty of two separate counts of Labor Code Violations and was fined $15,000. I have attached the decision for your review. Attachment 4: California Public Contract Code defining "responsible bidder", and the legislation that changed the Public Contract Code to enable awarding agencies to consider the "attribute of trustworthiness" in considering whether or not the bidders on a project are "responsible". The Building Trades Council believes B-1 Enterprise is not a responsible bidder, and should not be allowed to work on publicly funded projects in the State of California. I hope that I have provided you with sufficient cause to withdraw the resolution awarding a contract to B-1 Enterprise from your Consent Calendar agenda for the meeting on September 5, 2000. Sincerely, William A. Nack Business Manager WAN:ajg Enc. I'MNBAIION FOR FAN CUMAC7M6 ' - Fy,.�r�' J—'" CERTIFIED MAIL— RETURN RECEIPT August 22, 2000 e.... ._ SEP 1 6 2000 DEPT. OF PULL; : L. 3;,K3 CITY OF BURLINGAME ! E`'l i Staci Pugh — Judgment Unit Contractors State License Board P.O. Box 269117 Sacramento, CA 95826.9117 RE: B-1 Enterprises Corporation and Neil George DiLello, as an individual Dear Ms. Pugh: B-1 Enterprises Corporation was issued Citation Nos. 020066 and 016606 for violation of Labor Code Section 1294(e) by Deputy Labor Commissioner Juan Garza. A hearing affirmed the civil penalty assessments of $5,000 and $10,000, respectively (enclosed). Please suspend/revoke the contractors state license of B-1 Enterprises Corp., and any and all contractors state licenses that list Neil George DiLello as an individual until this judgment is satisfied. Thank you for assistance. Please notify our office on the status of the revocation. If you should need any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. Enclosures Case: 078BB 3807 Pas:ulena Avenue, Sulle 150 Saaunento, CA 95821 (916) 487-7871 F• (916) 487-0306 JOAVrf.4RORMAN.ICFIfENrFJFORT .sc Zoo -d H89:60 00/90/60 r0UN0ATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING; 925 252 0334; /V/Z.. --, S? Sep -4-00 3:15PM; Page 6/6 ATTAtNr OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS aVISION OF APPRENTICESHIP STANDARDS AUG O � LdOO .' 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Sth Floor San Francisca CA 94102 1- (415) 703-4920 F h L ADQV=Rv6v m: o -O. Box 420603 San hUtlYD G 94142 NOTICE OF COMPLAINT OF NONCOMPLIANCE Date: August 3, 2000 Complaint No.: 1999-7093 Respondent: B-1 Enterprise Corporation P.O. Box 6130 Corona, CA 91718 Complainant: Foundation for Fair Contracting 3807 Pasadena Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95821 Project Site: 1997-1998 Sidewalk Repair project No. 20011 Awarding Agency: City of Menlo Park / Engineering Department Menlo Park, CA - Varlos Locations 701 Laurel Street San Mateo County Menlo Park, CA 94025 6 - � %, The Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) has received a complaint alleging that you are not in compliance with Labor Code Section 1777.5 and the California Code of Regulations. The alleged violation (s) of Title 8 CCR Sectlone 230, 230. 1, and 230.2 Ware: ® Failed to provide the applicable Apprenticeship Committee with notice of contract award per Title 6 CCR Section 230. 177-1 Ljj Failed to comply with the required apprentice to journeyman ratio per Title 8 CCR Section 230.1 (a). ® Failed to property employ apprentice(s) by'assigning apprentic4(s) to perform work outside the craft or trade of the apprenticeable occupation per Title 8 CCR Section 230.1(c). ® Failed to make required contributions to a registered apprenticeship program or to the California Appenticeship Council (CAC) per Title 6 CCR Section 230.2. If you disagree with these aliegation(a), please submit evidence, postmarked by August 10, 2000, to show you compiled with Labor Code Section 1777.5 and Title 8 CCR Sections 230, 230.1 and 230.2. Should you fail to comply with the requirement of this Notice, procedures for determination of 'willful noncompliance" may be initiated pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.7. Willful noncompliance may result In civil penalties and you may be denied the right to bid on or receive public works contracts for a period up to three (3) years per tabor Code Section 1777.7. Enclosed are DAS documents to assist you in complying with Public Works requirements (Excerpts of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.7 from the California Code Relating to Apprentices on Public Works, DAS P.W. 1/00 and Excerpts from rite 8 of the California Code of Regulations). Please note that the California Labor Code Sections referenced above have recently been amended. The amendments took effect January 1, 2000. Shduld you have any questions, please call me at (415) 7034934 - Since* Enclosures cc: Awarding Body Complainant Rio Rev. 1/00 consultant Attachment 1 February 17, 1998 TO: Daniel Martinez, City Clerk FROM: Paula Kimbrell, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Request for Public Records (Hack) Enclosed is the document requested by William A. Nack in a fax that you received on February 13, 1998. Please advise Mr. Nack as follows, or send a copy of this memorandum to Mr. Nack Certain material has been deleted from the document on the grounds that disclosure of that information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy within the meaning of subsection (c) of Government Code section 6254. In addition, employees' names taken from certified payrolls were deleted as required by subsection (e) of the Labor Code section 1776. 100 cam. � N� Ifo U 'too 65.. y 20 5S SOURCE DOCUMENT REVIEW W CONTRACTOR: B - 1 ENTERPRISE CORP. CONTRACT: SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER PROJECT m IU96-04 REVIEW DATE: JUNE 25, 1997 REVIEWERS: MARTHA & GEORGE ZOLOTH, EQUALITY CONSULTING REASON FOR REVIEW A. Employees documented as working (including employees interviewed) on the project on specific days were not shown on the contractor's certified payrolls for those dates. B. Hours worked per day per the contractor's certified payrolls did not match the inspector's records. C. Employees' interviews contain the following complaints. 1. We were not allowed to take a lunch break, we would sneak our lunch when Neil Dilello, Project Superintendent, was out of sight. 2. Original weekly pay check in the amount of approx. $900 is given back to employer for cash exchange of $250.00 per week for 10 to 16 hours of work, 5 days a week. J. Please don't identify me to the contractor or other employees due to fear of getting hurt. 4. Neil Dilello told me to say $26 per hour when inspector asks or I will get in trouble. 5. We sleep and cook inside storage container -real ugly- one portable toilet. We use near- by fire hydrant to cleanup but will not shower, too cold to use this facility all week while staying in Oxnard. 6. Up at 4:00 to 5:00 AM to fuel, oil equipment and started work on the project as early as 5:30 AM. CONTRACTOR'S RECORDS - .A. TLvtE CARDS: . 1. The time cards matched the contractor's certified payrolls and contained the employees signatures. Mr. Dilello stated that the employees signed the time cards each week when paid. B. CERTIFIED PAYROLLS: 1. When asked about employees shown on the inspector's daily reports and not appearing on his certified payrolls, Mr. Dilello stated that his records were correct and that the inspector was not on the job often enough to know what was going on. We then pointed out that employees were interviewed working at the jobsite on dates that they were not shown on his certified payrolls. iVlr. Dilello asked to see the interviews but we explained that they were confidential. 2. We pointed out that his certified payrolls indicated that several of his employees worked nine and half hours per day, five days a week earning S 1,3 19.20, yet others seemed to be grouped into patterns earning 5482.30 per week, 5800 to $1000 per week, 5625 per week or S225.84 per week. We asked Mr. Dilello to explain how this was possible if his employees were driven in company trucks from Rancho Cucamonga to Oxnard on Monday, lived together in the company yard's "storage container", all started work at the same time each day and stopped at approximately the same time each day. 3. Mr. Dilello insisted that the employees did not work the same hours each day and that his records were correct. We pointed out that it was very unusual construction practice for an employee to stop work each week so that his check would be exactly $482.30 or $225.84. Mr. Dilello did not comment. 4. Just prior to the source document review we requested and received certified payrotls for the week ending June 14. By this time Mr. Dilello was aware that we had found discrepancies between days and hours worked on his project and we found a note at the bottom of the payroll stating "correction to hours for last week' that listed four employees that had been shorted hours from week ending June 7. June 7 most other employees worked four days, June 3 thorough June 6, eight and a half hours to ten hours per day per the contractor's certified payrolls. Listed below are the revisions added to the June 14 certified payrolls NAME— JUNE 7 HRS. ADDED PAY ADDED 5482.30 8 $208.56 $625.68 8 $208.56 $505.23 16 5417.12 $685.99 8.5 5225.84 5. We pointed out to Mr. Dilello that had worked on the project for four weeks and for three of those weeks worked exactly eighteen and one half hours earning $482.30 and was it not possible that mistakes had been made on the other payrolls also. Mr. Dilello had no comment. C. FEDERAL. AND STATE TAX DEDUCTIOtiS: 1. On the contractor's cerrin"ed payrolls for week ending March 3, 1997; all earned St.,301.93 and fzderal ar,d state w-ithholdtng taxes were 5200.00 and 550.00 respectively for each of them. However, the number of withholding exemptions for each employee was Single -1 Married -2, Tamed -5 and Married -2. D. CANCELED CHECKS 1. The signatures (signed or printed) on employee's check_, did not in many cases match those of previous weeks, or the signature on the weekly time cards. 2. For the most part no identification (drivers licenses etc.) was found under the endorsement of the checks when cashed at banks, liquor stores, markets and check cashing establishments. TINDINGS A. DOCUD iENTATIO�i OF EMPLOYEES WORKING ON THE PROJECT 1. The City inspector's daily reports are clear and concise. At the start of the contract a complete list of workers' names was included with the dates worked. The daily reports contained names of the employees and reference to the type of work being performed. In the March 11, 1997 daily report a conversation with Vir. Dilello was documented. 'TIF—ADVISED OF 8 LABORERSIWORKERS AND I COL;LITED 11 (ALFREDO, LOUIS, GENARO, PAULINO, MARIO, TOZMAS, JOSE, JOE, RATA,- GEORGE AGIANI O, SYLVIAN )". The certified payroll for March 11 only contained 8 of the workers listed. 2. Throughout the daily reports are instances where employees are named and the work they performed is described, but they do not appear on the contractor's certified payrolls. March 20, `BACKFILL OPERATION (R.AUL, JORGE) CON'TUNFUTVG ON SAN' JUANL." Not on contractor's certified payroll. 3. Vir. Dilello had working on the project for several days but he did not appear on certified payrolls. ivir. Dilello was informed of this at the source document review and told that every individual working on the project must appear on his certified payrolls, but continued to work on the job for 3 more weeks. Again he did not appear on the contractor's certified payrolls. B. N-CFIMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER DAY 1. At the source documem .review we reviewed and obtained copies of several time cards. ' Although Mr. Dileilo stated that the employees signed the time cards each week we found that many of the signatures were far too exact in placement on the cards not to have been copied from card to card. 2. Employee interviews have indicated that the entire crew was confined to living at the contractor's yard and awakened at between 4:00 and 5:00 A -M to fuel and o4 equipmcm. When we pointed this out to Mr. Mello he denied that and said that he had his own mechanic to work on the equipmem. When we said that was covered work under the Labor Code and asked why this person did not appear on hu certified payrolls he did not answer" 3. Employee and inspector observations indicate that the crew had no private transportation and arrived and departed the jobsite in contractor provided trucks or equipment. The crew all started at the same time in the morning and finished at approximately the same time each day. The inspector noted that when Mr. Dilello left early he told the crew not to leave until they completed a designated amount of work. 4. Daily reports nae complaints from private citizens stating that the contractor was working as early as 5:30 ALAS. Other entries state instances of the contractor's workers starting prior to 7:00 Alf. June 6, "05:52 EQUIPMENT PULLING ONTO JOBSITE WITH 3 BACKHOES, I SKIPLOADER, 1 TEN -WHEEL MIND TRUCK .... .EQUIPMENT TURNED OFF AS I WALK UP TO DUMP TRUCK AT BROOKSIDE AND A.t,.MROSE WORKERS ADVISED THAT THEY WERE ADVISED BY CONTRACTOR TO SHUT DOWN EQUIPMENT AND BEGIN bfANUAL WORK ...I6:00 CREW TOOK OFF FOR THE WEEKEND" This is a 12 hour day but certified payrolls show 8, 8.5, 9.5 and 10 hrs. In addition 3 employees listed as working on the inspector's report were not shown on the certified payrolls. 5. The City Inspector verified the employees' complaint that they were not allowed a lunch hour. 6. Only four employees, . were bhown on certified payrolls as working 9.5 hours per day each and every working day (see Exhibit 3). Two employed worked an average of about 29 hours straight time per week, 3 employees worked 20 hours and 3 worked an average of 8.5 hours per week. See Section D. CANCELED CHECKS and note that the only full time workers earning an average of 31,200.00 plus or minus, all had their checks deposited in the same bank, under the same name and under the same account member. 7. Certified payrolls compiled on or after week ending June 14, when the contractor was aware that the inspector was keeping close records of personal on the job, reported all employees (exp for • missing one day and not reported) working 8 or more hours per day, five days per week. AU employees were now earning 51,033 to $1,252 per week. C. FEDERAL Ati"D STATE TA}C DEDL'CTION 1. As voted above some of the employees' tax deductions did not conform to the federal and state tax tables. 2. married with 5 dependents, had a total of 51,620.00 (see Exhibit No. 1) in - federal tax withheld when the tax table indicated S1,181.00 should have taken. ........................................................................................... This raises the question of whether or not the 5250.00 per week taken out of " " 's check for federal and state taxes was paid to the proper agencies. D. CANCELED CHECKS 1. The first week's paychecks (week ending February 15) for three employers were cashed by at an O ward Bank. This was the only time that checks were cashed at or near the job site. 2. All of the remainder of the paychecks for as well as all paychecks for were deposited (stamped for deposit only, not cashed) in the California State Bank rn the Covina Branch under the name of account number 3. The four employees noted above live in Corona, Corona, Riverside and Compton and it would be extremely unlikely that they would drive out of their way to Covina to deposit their paychecks in the same account and not receive any cash. It would be even more unlikely that they all write checks on the same account. 4. Many of the paychecks were cashed at the Ontario Liquor Store. In a visit to the store we spoke to a person who said he was the manager but would not give his name. We showed him copies of checks cashed at this location and asked if they were cashed there: He confirmed that the checks were cashed there but would not ensurer any questions such as: Why was no identification required? Would you cash a check for me if I printed m3' name and had no ID? Do you know a Mr. Mello? He did say that be knew the people cashing the checks but could not explain why the signatures on checks from the same person did not match. Employees indicated in interviews that Mr. Mello would go with them to cash the checks and then take all but 5250 for himself. 5. Please see Exhibit No. 2, WEEKLY PAY CHECKS. E. EILPLOYEE EN-FERVIEWS .. ................................................................................................................................................ .......................................:........................................................................................................ CONCLUSIONS The B - 1 Enterprises Inc. certified payrolls do not correctly reflect the actual number of employees working at the construction site. As documented above Nir. Mello's records lack credibility and do not reflect a true picture of days or hours worked on this project. �, None of the B - 1 Enterprise employees working on this project were paid prevailing wages. according to the contractor's certified payrolls worked an average of 9.5 hours per day, 5 days per week. Their paychecks were all deposited in the same bank, the same account, and to the sameaccount no. .................................................................................................. With all of the wages .being deposited in the same account it appears that none of the four employees had access to money deposited................................................................................... Calculation ofwages acbmlly paid for the hours worked came to 55.26 per hour. A wage violation case has been prepared based upon all of the above information. The total amount of wages owed to employees has been calculated to be 588,873.48. The total penalties accessed are 539,300.00. The total amount owed by B - l Enterprises due to wage violations and penalties equals S128,173.48. It is recommended that in accordance with Labor Code Sections 1727, 1775 and 1813 , ,an amount equal to the total of S 128,173.48 for wage violations and penalties be withheld from B - I Enterprises final payment until this case is resolved. -LYuALITY CONSULTING AMOUNT DUE EACH ElWLOYEE FOR WAGE VIOLATIONS BY -B-1 ENTERPRISE CORP. rctstcuARY L -_[AY: NLkRCH ',APa--,% . m �7 S 1. I23.99 $1,12399 wy-IMINITIM 5 i 54.629.69 i $938.00 i:���1.671.96 $10.432.10 12�.99982 52.999.82 i L2.226.1-5- I $1.106.72 53.332.87 I �S2 751.79 S1.106.72 E 35-22561 . m �7 S 1. I23.99 $1,12399 wy-IMINITIM F- -g a S.Ujl:M t-- -;g . la s s si.q igj- i 1 :Q*;". . : I i• El a -. - -. -.. - 8 8 s '4 , I I • :8 2 -. -. 5: C; W?. �i ci d -i i �l :.,i c; -i -i 14 C� i lj. ..E - cn 2: F- 0 t-- . T i 8 S C FS 8 S � S 9 El a -. - -. -.. - 8 8 s '4 a 2 -; • :8 2 -. -. 5: C; W?. �i ci d -i i �l :.,i c; -i -i 14 C� i lj. ..E - cn 8 E,Z 2 a a 2 RR 7 d cs P. 6 �:-g i .6 r I C� 14 n n -I! c-; U3 qNa -2 Y. "I z 4,d .4 -W .4 z :C! I rz C� C; M 6'� 2 7A PZPX C; CR -R n CR C! q q" 7- lk EO;, 78.72; LU � R Cl. n 1a oqy. �i C; LU -i � Id d li,Vc; -%d .4 16 19 a j Id 16 cwl t.; C�d L 4Ri Ri C;- �slr F- 0 t-- . T i 8 S C FS 8 S � S 9 El a -. - -. -.. - 8 8 s '4 a 2 -; • :8 2 -. -. 5: �i ci d -i i �l :.,i c; -i -i 14 C� i lj. ..E - cn RR 7 r I c-; qNa -2 Y. C;: C; C; CR -R n CR C! q q" LU � R Cl. n 1a oqy. �i C; LU cwl t.; C�d L 4Ri Ri C;- �slr p, n� oi; 5 cs e Rm n -R n C; IR q oR tz cn 8.81S,SI8.8 $ S,S:S:S:S;S o '8;8 S:S:B 8 S s S:SE psi is _ qq. 7 w s. 1 ;N �i• � j i N Fs. F5. �'y a�s_n8a�:yS i «P n««�' � I Io..d S ^ M.N N. N P � My'� 1 .KS �. N� I y N' FG IAr I 1 LTJ r :oh �: I�',N,I tl:n. s. $. �' .pr HSN• •N�VI�N I:r „ } ,� �� Fpri8 tl� „= S a�a•n. H' <'�' k r: n Y; j kry H ''tl ^ I pp P�H;NI «' i ! C`.. I:IEp'• � 4„.N 'H.N N� 1 IN N - � Ti � M, N� 'H'N'N• i ItFF f{�] h iQ"� � �No.r Ntl'! [ �O Y1 V �• Ni� P ry •G•N O f . N I O N Zi V: (!V V ry O• '• IriV•'J' �M yi N.N M N N N:N N N Y N N N N M N N NI C ,o -a bail is IIv I !k 1 Or 'll `��: -!u'O. VI�•I. C'P �O� IQ N�i��'^�O�r P�A� E•1� i W`�q`�''' � ,o tNi N: MNN :� i I N Nr :N• y' F--• ��'• I h FC vl tl'.C•V tl •p P i� < F� G G � I ;.tl.13':_,:1�—... ... '"�—o M N'N,NrN NNNMMN N'H• � •cl ryryc IN L.INM NMNNH h z9J, c. O r —� � , 1 /ter. O /cc) p] 4 `+ �• _ S1 O Y a 8 O S FJ E S. O Of V.O I aC f1^y Mtl� NPI I I �F.NRSl�1rlCOI i •� ,o 'o. ofo. o. r. r.• F•” G �^t 4p 1 0 •O� VI: •O' O. N: IC O. .0 C N y .� tz w F-.� w cs i. o o r. N Vj I Cil. r. a I-, W i-••1 rryr F, I F� I LZI •o,N N26 . I N, Wi I k Y""i 1' F 1 I I 1 N fC:C"es 4 1 o: r N .: o. f•p = .. u C f vi I.O.c. O O o c— 'c+.or —_ _ •^. c r. c o e N l o c o o r V i. i Ip C I�.� i 'v 1`.•'O Y v C,:J� G v y Y z FN� iT P r Z. Y �<. 5 Z Y O S 5 Z I= w Z Ir 2i, Z: EA! IS 9 P: ZR is Z! zi V zz 5 5. 13 If IR, o ;L -ll z 7;SIS 8 C4 :%, C4 -Ti I TT7 Ln —L -i Ima is :D 4; n 'i C'I r 11, .4 . . CS: WZ 'Wm if I-- n r�-- �- I - — I_ Z— W. 'I"I. i n 55 51 cl q W. en 'zis C; C; I.CRr. _aero IS Tc—i 77 -i C! O .2 C C--; �-i C.! cw;, .�-s -I. • �n- F LO E5 55 ct C C--; �-i C.! .�-s -I. c. 0 U r- Wl rn U ri i khE98al '8.8 E88 j i 88 88 :c�.«x.82.88_ � 8.a:•w�=9m- p .. - M I � Vi I �-•OV 5 . K i 1 • ZZ� OL} 1 i� � ��Z ! �1?•. a.i 0 � moi=9g� a . 5 . K i R 5 R l.•sa:i ' i F.^ ts.�••aa- w.�t.�Yr r i8�88.€£88S s. a a:84s s - 77--,i R. - -- Y ! 5 3 .g$ cs sat k t trI gas �€ e;: 4 e ,U' � r ? >oa.! r: AT I �'a.tl -' , _ i i -i.���•" 1y.i j `r✓•3S,oars,`et7 I 0- t'. a K}+ o»^ rkEri ? �t I 3 €x888 Ig�tl.e_ k€£888 g'gnee j Z j < =-I 'r i OGO t !Z 3 v c I i r } ' i 1 i R 5 R l.•sa:i ' i F.^ ts.�••aa- w.�t.�Yr r i8�88.€£88S s. a a:84s s - 77--,i R. - -- LI .g$ sat k t trI gas �€ e;: 4 e fo r: AT I �'a.tl -' , _ i i -i.���•" 1y.i j `r✓•3S,oars,`et7 I 0- K}+ o»^ rkEri ? �t I 3 €x888 Ig�tl.e_ k€£888 g'gnee j 2 �-:, = ' - 77--,i R. - -- c n----��• Y t -' , _ i i -i.���•" 1y.i j `r✓•3S,oars,`et7 I 0- K}+ 3 I � Z j RU a 2 R �RIWQ-8'8.8. .21 1 s ME 9 �22 9; 1 Z., !- i g- -�nzza iZ.gqI ! ��g . , A -f :. " j^ N! No Fic a-�, i L• to 5-� 4 j fatd 12: N G:n!s. $ rl a 2 2 -, 19 o =fin` Irtl+-s 6 P, FIV L I P;E 1, L4 C4 -1,.q; b—d wit 55 -ii .1 -z-2 In W); ap -6 7 3 I i5 Si:StiSS5t�5t:S SS i E F•.4.1 " L—ag Iql g: 4,.q: gf g! 51 g;:z g=888.88'8 9 9,9 cL tog r f 14 !a H; gla 5c's g:, g. a mi z I jN. 1 g g S.d.d.d..; c; Sd F.4A6�4446d.d,dc; .4 ZD 0 C,O z m4 ZD EZ) 01: wn W ve. z z Lq �j FIS, aaaa:aa•$ a:a a aa:a s E;a.a a:a:a( s;s.a. ►�. �:R�R�3 �»'S�»•R x,8 ! !I! F[.jo:�a:i»V883D=2;_'� .=xF._.... I: R Z j�c{[ r :^•^�$88'Ba R� r ^a:8 �;�5 € e_$ fS 3Z� qa, R«.SM3-9.9„8 1 4gro N F P INN I = � �, • j\ '99 � I`''• c N� N w N M w M M w« •'• C M:N N N �' I II F • a M 1 w� N l �-•� • n! ^j a ' �I s! Ei Si SEES aRi R=! Sc q,. ! -..�'.iI I ;•«I�'I �o:ns ZS !'� - 'aw-.. o Y^.:3:!v'3f:=.`e•3:'.P C•3: 8 I ^ai^":�'� ox r � :!: �: .o'<F.� �<.: �� c � 3 =» F 'c'1`.si w': -.i .�. $' o�."n'.•°. .•O. $. o•."•. .. `n S I = �.'1'�; IN NN.MiNMNNNNMM I M'M. "M•N "1 �NN � NM" _` G ,yjr�[S-.'`L•IjF' ir{ I - I j i I r F N N rt ! ! `z zd i8s's8ss898aa22 ss ;s.88.s88!8„ sg (�-.,.e.Cc o e c e A i -i n :v- «C.e .;r �; :acs g'g Aa f4 00 i Z cl ! a — �%P _ _ t .gam ,r ° ��5z S''�. '✓r.��`c� '� o L iZ j.��rtdS I_''1•ee}µ_ LZ«Z 2- Z •�•z__�__� • 'yl � 3 � 3 � � is � � °� {o o.o o p o o e.0 }a. a.a.alo•o;a.a.a a 8'8 — : •— _ , » • Z .,.8ry5�'�i �d:n'ni.-:S-•.gn�$$88R } i - .^.. o.v'v- =,� � .rI � n - � }.,.». re ye. � .e3 N_r'-:»aa„a3 r; to ` �m8n.e.88.'.,e8 I�.�.,e�l„188.--C8S8aw�8, I �CL »i �aiLi r arrtsielo,8 1 .L f'�'M1 A � �"�:� �.•G —•MI” I .0 ^ M 1��Ii. . ItiIM fi fr ry N N•N:�f;M:NIM �..I. �.M y' t M 1 1 I t M N V1 N,M M N•y M 1 IMM �� 3 i y Uld LL e a •moi.' Z c 12 K' d I I w Z ` E — f t {o o.o o p o o e.0 }a. a.a.alo•o;a.a.a a 8'8 — l i r i i •— _ , » e .,.8ry5�'�i �d:n'ni.-:S-•.gn�$$88R ti'S rryC�NCC �P�.•vC� s(Vjp'.vc oo O'v.QCC add Z, al i�Y.abY � p, 1 �1 T — - 1 W' O 0• G R. �: C G O � � IV n1 C — •— _ , » e .,.8ry5�'�i �d:n'ni.-:S-•.gn�$$88R o,v. o v .�,_ - � o• i - .^.. o.v'v- =,� � .rI � n - � }.,.». re ye. � .e3 N_r'-:»aa„a3 to �m8n.e.88.'.,e8 I�.�.,e�l„188.--C8S8aw�8, i3 ^r;g �CL »i �aiLi r arrtsielo,8 1 .L f'�'M1 A � �"�:� �.•G —•MI” I .0 ^ M 1��Ii. . ItiIM fi fr ry N N•N:�f;M:NIM �..I. �.M y' t M 1 1 I t M N V1 N,M M N•y M 1 IMM �� 3 i ti'S rryC�NCC �P�.•vC� s(Vjp'.vc oo O'v.QCC add Z, al i�Y.abY � p, 1 �1 T — - 1 W' O 0• G R. �: C G O � � IV n1 C — •— _ , » e �aiLi LZ��Z L=' .L = Zz 3 i y LL : a •moi.' I � w i 1 c 12 K' d I I w r 8:21 �11! gist li 51 Is sal 182. ;wl a 1:2 .1113 &1 I z 'MA I F 25 ZS LBO:, 0, '[I r IS EV~ C a P r. g pi '04; zj g Eiji �-;5 5s. Vito a 8a 10 04 J1 :E jS E 8 -c! 8,9 8 8 E 8'8 9 r 8:21 �11! gist li 51 Is sal 182. ;wl a 1:2 .1113 &1 I 'MA I F 25 ZS LBO:, 0, '[I r IS EV~ C a P r. g pi '04; zj g Eiji �-;5 5s. Vito a 04 J1 :E jS E 8 -c! 8,9 8 8 E 8'8 9 Ehi L r r 0, :E e; k3.5t'8:8'S;xF his: tbh �S;or':St .n7 NA > b$.q 9_: L8 '88a3 o bE88-E888888: Iia yy 9 xr .J YI �a r'i ,&g•n i le o7• x:9.0 �E�E99 Ira 899 �:5pi' i.^S: on. �..`.nS..nrS^ s^�.';" � $•'. .R .'. �.�.5 «.01 .4� f � kCa.�:G�a :$9. F I 1 < 0. 1: �.n•.' e v rte"= a= a i = n a �: o' 1� �'t v o o r' ."e, f r r., c i a I I.V'a»»3n 1 w'a� r I b fYiawaw ; . t ! •:„.o '�9C�8' e900s '88889: 8:8889 I f �$•;,::8:�80�8 g ..a.„o imno_ .::e:o I«g aooi M N.«� f I = E»I ^ a: "� !MIM: :„. I i :a«I E» j 1•i j l i' i i •9 LE�C�^+•-_.Ipp�' .$.i �.� w oo. i o;"n „..9•..9i tal.•ni: 9 ;e';;g $� 0 • M E'»NMM « � r. a NMN�L {.e:� a e' �»�< i w�$• t r i _ '4 •: S.88 R•C 8.on 8.oi•� ': 8.x .'.-� Z ..a,�-:ZS; I .rr'C9-4: o.4 -S6 . . .n.=oo . ! ' 1 •t f = t iz ch b ,Lj•LV' t` i O TE '••• o. 1 'O'o� �t64. !�r�^ice ki ��n�n• �M1 I•----��” w , j- -_ ia,3`'So`a•a`>>=� I 5`3S'''a ! °:6�5�� �a`.sSo�' ;5�5�"c i • ��2L Z LL ! `t iz= •tom zzz Betz= '• �Zi z{-. ' 3 Attachment 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON Governor DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT BUREAU OF FIELD ENFORCEMENT - PUBLIC WORKS Roger Miller, Senior Deputy 107 South Broadway, Suite 5043 Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 897-6595 February 11, 1998 William Nack Santa Clara Building Trades 2102 Almaden Road, Ste. 101 San Jose, CA 95125 Dear Mr. Nack: This letter is being sent to confirm our telephone conversatiun this date. Our records show that the public. works unit has a case docketed against B1. The case number is 40-03682/032. It is an active case under investigation. In addition, the division's legal staff is assisting the City of Oxnard in defending the city's action of withholding funds for alleged under payment of the state prevailing wage by B1 to their employees. If you have any questions. please call me at the above number. Sinc grel , D. Mille �Z e or Deputy cc: Jose Millan, Labor Commissioner