The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso - CC - 088-2000RESOLUTION NO. 88-2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION for DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a design review permit to construct a second story addition at 131 Loma Vista Drive. zoned R-1. Vincent and Doreen Cauchi, property owners. APN: 027-051-080 ; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on July 10. 2000, at which time said application was approved; WHEREAS, this matter was _ appealed to City Council and a hearing thereon held on August 21. 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per CEQA Section: 15303 - Existing Facilities, Class 3(a), Single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. 2. Said design review permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review permit as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. MAYO I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of August, 2000 , and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, SPINELLI, 0i°MAHONY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE a>"LJ. Q1,A1Ujja CITY CLERK EXIIIBIT "A" Conditions of approval Categorical Exemption and Design Review 131 LOMA VISTA EFFECTIVE AUGUST 21, 2000 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 15, 2000, sheets A.1, A.2, A.3 and Landscape Plan; 2. that the conditions of the City Engineer's April 10, 2000 memo shall be met; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the residence, which would include changing the size or location of windows, or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that the fountain shown in the front yard on the landscape plan shall be removed and no fountain shall be placed in any portion of the front yard visible from the street; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. RESOLUTION NO. 88-2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION for DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a design review permit to construct a second story addition at 131 Loma Vista Drive. zoned R-1 Vincent and Doreen Cauchi. property owners. ARM 027-051-080 ; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on Iu1y_10. 2000, at which time said application was approved; WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council and a hearing thereon held on August 21. 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; 0 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that: t4 Na 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments Ora .+� o received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that o� the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, ma .. 9� R per CEQA Section: 15303 - Existing Facilities, Class 3(a), Single-family residences not in conjunction W" with the building of two or more such units is hereby approved. Nam 2. Said design review permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review permit as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. PQ. rh. U' MAY01(7 I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of August, 2000 , and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBE$S: COFFEY, GALLIGAI JAPgE,Y„ SPI KQJ.L,I,t]MOAHONY If= hereby certify t is it NOES: COUNCILMEMBER@Pd 65111rec purports �ahich is ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER�n fffONE - lw Dated _ E _ �urlingam9 Recording Requested by: Ann T. Musso, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 When Recorded Mail to: Ann T. Musso, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlineame. CA 94010 DOC a 2000—MOSSOO 08/25/2000 12:11P R1 Fee:NC Page 1 of 4 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Rssessor-CountING Clerk -Recorder RecordeE CITY d By BURL114 IIIIIII VIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIII113IIIIIIIIIIII THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY Y� TITLE OF DOCUMENT: RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval Categorical Exemption and Design Review 131 LOMA VISTA EFFECTIVE AUGUST 21, 2000 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 15, 2000, sheets A.1, A.2, A.3 and Landscape Plan; 2. that the conditions of the City Engineer's April 10, 2000 memo shall be met; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the residence, which would include changing the size or location of windows, or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that the fountain shown in the front yard on the landscape plan shall be removed and no fountain shall be placed in any portion of the front yard visible from the street; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. IIIIIIIIII II I IIVIIIII I I II VIII II II 80003 02 05608 ROUTING FORM DATE: April 5, 2000 TO: )( CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for Design Review for a second -story addition at 131 Loma Vista Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-051-080. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: May 8, 2000 (if processed with new design review procedure). STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, April 10, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Janice/Ruben y ✓arn) vNP LU Date of Comments Htac,�e. � o�C vn 11111I II111111111111111111111111111111111111111111120000 az 05608 Warren Slocum Chief Elections Officer & Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder RECEIPT # 73585 Clerk: RKORWEK 08/25/2000 12:11P Document Num: 2000-105608 BURLINGAME CITY REC. NO.: 2000-105608 # Pgs : 4 DOC TYPE: RESOLUTIONS FEE: 16.00 TOTAL NO CHARGE FEE -----> 16.00 TOTAL FEE ---------------> 0.00 TOTAL PAYMENTS ----------> 0.00 Page 1 555 County Conger Redwood City, CA 94063.1665 w.b—.care.co.sonmoteo. ca.us Assessor Clerk Recorder phon. 650.J61.1500 taw 650.767,190;1 phon. 650.J61VI1' f.. 650.367.41143 ph... 650. J63, 4713 fax 650.5997786 .mall ussns I.,%N a, n. co..ianmulnora.us .mail,6kk...... co. wnmulno ai.u� .maJ rncordarvOmra co.sanmatno.caul