HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - BC - 2005.04.04�. B URLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
AUGUST 4, 2005
5:30 P.M.
CITY HALL
Conference Room A - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA
I. ROLL CALL
II. MINUTES OF DUNE 2, 2005 COMMISSION MEETING
M. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. FROM THE FLOOR (At this time, persons in the audience may speak on any item on
the agenda or any other matter. The Ralph M. Brown Act prohibits the Commission from
acting on a matter which is not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes.)
V. OLD BUSINESS
1. Tree View Policy
2. Long Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive — Committee Status Report
VI. NEW BUSINESS
1. Nominating Committee Report/Election of Officers
VII. REPORTS
1. Staff
2. Chairperson
3. Commissioners
In considering whether or not to recommend to the commission the
adoption of a tree view ordinance for the City of Burlingame, the
committee assigned to study the issue has had the benefit of hearing
from members of the public who have expressed interest in
considering the adoption of a tree view ordinance. We are
sympathetic to their plight.
We have also had access to many facts related to tree view
ordinances, freely available on the Internet, including much research
on the economic value of a tree canopy to residential and business
property owners. This economic research was done by professors
from leading universities around the U.S.
In coming to a decision, we believed it would be insufficient if we did
not consider all of the relevant facts. We found all of the following
facts relevant and compelling:
�.. I. A panoramic and sweeping view of the bay can significantly
add to a home owner's property value, and it is therefore
worthwhile to consider how to protect an existing panoramic
and sweeping view of the bay.
2. Tall tree canopies can also add significantly to a home owners
property value, and in the following ways:
- Studies have shown that a home buyer is willing to pay 5%
more for a property with trees than without, and as much as
15% more for a property with mature trees.
- Studies have also shown that tall shade trees can reduce
utility costs for cooling by as much as 15% to 35%, and can
reduce heating costs with windbreak by as much as 10% to
50%. A recent UCLA study on the impact of global warming on
California notes that the San Francisco bay area will begin a
transition to a climate similar to Sacramento within 12 years
from now. Thus the cooling benefit of tall canopy of trees
becomes even more significant.
Trees protect hillsides from landslides and also mitigate the impact
`— of storm water runoff. This is especially beneficial to Burlingame
as we have a problem draining our storm water runoff due to over-
stressed main sewer pipes that are often undersized, made of
clay, and outdated.
- Studies have also shown that residential properties within
proximate range of wooded parks command a 10% to 20%
property value premium compared to those not within
proximate range of a wooded park.
3. Studies have also shown that Rental buildings with trees have a
7% higher rental rate than those without trees.
4. Studies of shopping areas have found that people have a clearer
preference for tall tree canopy in shopping areas, because it is
more inviting and enhances strolling and lingering. These same
studies show that the average shopper spends 30 minutes in a
shopping area with no trees, 60 minutes in an area with small
trees, and 80 minutes in an area with tall canopy trees. The study
`.- shows that this translates to merchants able to charge on
average 5% to 20% higher product pricing, depending on
category of goods provided.
5. The committee noted that all cities should be aware of these facts,
and no city should overlook these facts. Burlingame has never
had a tree view ordinance, much less a policy, outside of that
currently required by our planning commission. Thus introducing
a new tree view ordinance should not be considered lightly.
6. The committee also found and takes special note of the fact that
some cities (such as El Cerrito and Berkeley) that have tree view
ordinances also have had many lawsuits and much acrimony
between neighbors as a result. A tree ordinance is an attempt to
address competing and often contentious claims for rights and to
set a standard to apply to the entire city.
7. Especially noted by the committee is that none of the cities that
currently have a tree view ordinance also have the "Tree City
�.. USA" distinction that Burlingame has.
8. And finally, the committee believes that putting forth an ordinance
is a drastic step, especially in light of the fact that taking the first
step of providing a city tree view policy has never been
considered or attempted.
In consideration of all of the above 8 points, we firmly recommend
against a tree view ordinance for the city of Burlingame.
Instead, we recommend the creation of a tree view policy as
guidance and mechanism to resolve tree view disputes on a
case -by -case individual basis for those members of the public who
want to protect their panoramic and sweeping views of the bay. We
believe it is possible that having a tree view policy could alleviate
problems expressed by members of the public.
We have already done much research on a tree view policy, and can
recommend a draft of such policy if the commission decides to accept
the recommendation of the committee.