Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - BC - 2007.04.05AGENDA B URLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION APRIL 5, 2007 5:30 P.M. CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD - Conference Room A Burlingame, CA I. ROLL CALL H. MINUTES III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. FROM THE FLOOR (At this time, persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter. The Ralph M. Brown Act prohibits the Commission from acting on a matter which is not on the agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes.) V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Easton Drive Reforestation Plan - Tree Hazard Evaluation Form Approval VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. Street Tree Reforestation Project — Commissioners Lists of Blocks with Few Trees 2. Consideration of Reinstating the Landscape Award 3. Arbor Day 2008 — Centennial Planning 4. Rescheduled Joint Meeting - Beautification Commission & Council — June 18 at 6:00pm VII. REPORTS 1. Staff 2. Chairperson 3. Commissioners Tree Assessment Large Blue Gum Eucalyptus. 1800 Easton Drive Burlingame, CA Kielty Arborist Services P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 650-525-1464 April 23, 2007 Bob Disco Burlingame Parks and Recreation 850 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Site:1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame, CA Assignment: The Burlingame City Council has requested a complete assessment of the large blue gum eucalyptus at the above site. Burlingame requested the assessment be carried out by three independent Certified Arborists who have vast experience and knowledge in this field. The three arborists shall have no connections to any persons or, groups that would alter their opinions of this tree. Specialized equipment for the root crown excavation and examination will be used by the arborists to ensure the least amount of trauma to the inspected areas. A thorough analysis will be conducted on the findings. The arborists will provide the council with their fmdings in the form of a written report. The report is expected by the City in time for a complete review prior to the city council meeting on May 7, 2007. Photographs of the process will be included with the report in the form of a compact disc. A representative of the arborist team will be present at the council meeting on May 7, 2007 to explain the findings and answer any questions. The Certified Arborists who were chosen to complete this assignment are: ♦ Michael Santos of Hortscience of Pleasanton, CA o Certified Arborist # WE-3877 o Registered Consulting Arborist #430 ♦ Robert Weatherill of Advanced Tree Care of Redwood City, CA o Certified Arborist # WC-1936 ♦ Kevin Kielty of Kielty Arborist Services of San Mateo, CA o Certified Arborist # WE-0476A All three arborists have many years of experience and are considered experts in the areas of arboriculture. The three arborists chosen for this project were approved by Bob Disco, arborist and contact person for the City of Burlingame. 1800 Easton Dr./4/23/07 (2) Method: The root crown of the blue gum was excavated to expose the large buttress roots. Approximately 12 inches of soil was removed to a distance of 3 feet from the trunk. This work was carried out over a 2 day period, using shovels, picks, electric jack hammer, compressor and an air spade. The root crown was inspected using a wooden sounding mallet, and a resistograph, a rod that helps to detect soft spots inside the tree, was used to identify possible decayed areas. A visual inspection of the root crown and lower trunk was also carried out. Following the inspections, it was deemed unnecessary to have samples analyzed at a plant laboratory. The foliar canopy was thoroughly inspected. Due to the extreme height of the tree the tree was climbed. The climber accessed the tree by way of the aerial lift truck provided by the City. A.N.S.I. approved climbing ropes and saddles were used for the accent. No climbing gaffs were used at any time for this inspection. Visual assessments were taken and decay was tested by probing the surfaces of old pruning wounds. The methods will be explained in further detail in each arborist's report. Time line: The assessments and excavation were carried out in a 10 day period, from April 9 to April 18, 2007. ♦ Monday, April 9, 2007 - Robert Weatherill climbed and inspected the blue gum tree's canopy. Kevin Kielty assisted from the aerial lift truck. ♦ Thursday, April 12, 2007 - Robert Weatherill and Kevin Kielty exposed the root crown on the sidewalk side. ♦ Monday, April 16, 2007 - Robert Weatherill and Kevin Kielty exposed the root crown on the street side. ♦ Tuesday, April 17, 2007 - Michael Santos examined the root crown. Robert Weatherill and Kevin Kielty observed. ♦ Wednesday, April 18, 2007 - Kevin Kielty inspected the backfilled site. Photographs were taken at each stage of the inspection. Persons with information as to the history and maintenance of the tree were interviewed. The City of Burlingame's staff including members of the tree crew was quite helpful during this process. ..-IN FRO 1800 Easton Dr./4/23/07 (3) Summary: The three Certified Arborists selected for this project completed their assignment in a timely and professional manner. Their reports describe the work-andiithe testing -in ra clear and concise manner. As the lead arborist on this project, I was on site for all examinations and excavations. The three arborists hired for this project have discussed and agreed on each others findings. We are also in agreement that at this time there is no need to incorporate additional decay assessment tools. In his report, Michael Santos has outlined tree protection guidelines if road work is to be carried out. I would like to emphasize the importance of having an arborist on site during any excavation near the root zone of this tree. This work can be carried out by the Burlingame staff arborists or by an independent licensed certified arborist. In his report, Robert Weatherill has outlined future pruning specifications. These specifications should be incorporated into future contracts for tree maintenance. The excellent care this tree has received over the years and the diligence of the Burlingame Parks Department has contributed to this large trees favorable report. Continued maintenance of this tree is critical to ensure the health and safety of the tree. Despite the quality of care this tree receives, living near or below large trees has its inherent dangers. This report by no means guarantees the future health or safety of this tree. This report is to be used as a guideline for the City of Burlingame. The information included in these reports is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. The report is intended for use by the City of Burlingame only. Use of this report by others will require permission from the City of Burlingame and the Certified Arborists who have collaborated in the writing of this report. The arborists hired for this assessment have not discussed their findings with unauthorized persons or parties. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476A /gSOGIETY z IVO. WE-047GA c Zu c�ti� czi� D ARB���� *h Horlicullural Consultants ro. F S INC. April 24, 2007 Kevin Kielty Kielty Arborist Services PO Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 Subject: Blue gum evaluation 1800 Easton Dr. Dear Mr. Kielty: The City of Burlingame is responsible for maintaining a mature blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) located at 1800 Easton Dr. The City staff is concerned about the health and structural stability of the tree. You asked HortScience, Inc. to be part of a team of consulting arborists. HortScience was asked to evaluate the condition of the lower trunk and root collar, and make recommendations as appropriate. I visited the site with the City of Burlingame staff, Robert Weatherill, Advanced Tree Care and you on April 17. This report summarizes my assessment and recommendations. Methods of Evaluation I evaluated the health and structure of lower trunk and root collar based on a visual inspection of external conditions. You had excavated soil from the base of the trunk to expose the root collar. The tree was examined for decay indicators, including: • Cavities; • decay conks or mushrooms; • bleeding along trunk; • old wounds. I also tested the tree at several locations with the Resistograph®, a decay detection device. This tool pushes a 15" long by 2 mm diameter needle through the wood and records the resistance to penetration on a graph. Sound wood appears as a jagged line increasing in height on the graph, while a straight line at the bottom represent cavities. Decayed wood tends to be straight or wavy lines low on the graph. Observations The blue gum was located in front of the Easton Branch Library and was tagged as #37. The tree was in a 15' wide planting area between Easton Dr. and the sidewalk. The base of the trunk had grown over the top of the curb. A damaged section of street had been removed to assist in examination of the root collar. z' P.C. Box 754 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Phone:925 484 0211 FAX: 925 484 5096 www.horLscience.com Kevin Kielty, Kielty Arborist Services HortScience, Inc. 1800 Easton Dr., Burlingame Page 2 -IN Tree canopy The tree appeared to be in good condition, and mature in form and character (photo 1). It had an 85" diameter trunk. Robert Weatherill, Advanced Tree Care performed an aerial inspection of the canopy. His report will provide an assessment of the condition of the tree's canopy. Lower trunk and root collar The lower trunk appeared normal. I sounded this area with a wood mallet for decay and did not detect any hollow areas. I did not observe any decay conks. A few small brown mushrooms were found on the shedding bark. This fungus is likely saprophytic. You removed the soil approximately 30" from the base of the trunk between the curb and sidewalk. Twelve (12) buttress roots (large woody roots) were exposed. The roots ranged in size from 4" to 25" in diameter, and were well distributed around the trunk (photo 2 and 3, next page). On the Easton Dr. side a section of raised asphalt about 5' by 8' was removed. This revealed a solid mass of wood tissue 8' across. I could not determine if this conformation was the result of the trunk growing over the old street, or roots that had been ground down for street repairs and re-formed into the solid mass. I examined each root and the root mass visually and sounded the roots with a wood mallet for decay. I checked the condition of the underside of a few roots. All roots appeared normal. Minor wounds were present on the top of a few roots near Easton Dr. City staff authorized the use of the Resistograph® to validate the findings from the visual tree assessment. L- OR Kevin Kielty, Kielty Arborist Services NortScience, Inc. 1800 Easton Dr., Burlingame Page 3 I probed four (4) areas of the trunk and four (4) locations on buttress roots (photos #2 and 3). The results are as follows. ■ Readings #1-4—N,S,E,W at 18" above ground in trunk; sound wood to 15", depth of drill (Figure 1, example of reading). * Reading #5 (W between #1 and 2) at ground level in buttress root; sound wood to 15". ■ Reading #6 (S between #2 and 3) at ground level in root mass, S of small wound; sound wood to 4" and decay from 4"-15". ■ Readina #7 (S between #2 ana �3) at grouna ievei in root mass, N of small wound in #6; sound wood to 15". ■ Reading #8 (S between #3 and 4) at ground level in buttress root, sound wood to 15". The readings for the trunk and roots indicated sound wood with one minor exception. Reading #6 in the root mass, near a small wound, found decay, however a second reading nearby indicated soundwood. lwl Easton Dr. ism f Photo 2 i� Library #4 Photo 3 Figure 1, below: Representative example, Resistograph® reading #3; E at 18" above ground in trunk; indicates sound wood, jagged line increasing in height on the graph. • i 15", depth of drill 10" 5" 0", bark Kevin Kielty, Kielty Arborist Services 1800 Easton Dr., Burlingame HortScience, Inc. Page 4 Summary and Recommendations An evaluation of the lower trunk and root collar of this mature blue gum showed these areas appeared to be sound, with one minor exception. Decay was found in the root mass on the south (reading #6). However, reading #7, just north of #6 showed sound wood to depth of drill. I consider the small amount of decay found in #6 to be minor and not unexpected in a tree of this size. I assess the tree's potential to fail from the lower trunk or root collar as low. I recommend the following. Re -design of the damaged street near the tree should consider the following. a. Excavation for street repair should be monitored by the City Arborist or a Consulting Arborist. Some excavation by hand or air spade; may be required. b. Locate new curb and gutter at least 6' from trunk and beyond the root mass. c. Install tree protection fencing (TREE PROTECTION ZONE) at 1' back of curb prior to construction. Use 6' high chain link fence on concrete blocks to protect the lower trunk and root collar from damage by debris and equipment. Fence shall remain until all construction is completed. d. No root greater then 3" in diameter shall be pruned without the approval of the arborist. Root pruning of roots 3" and smaller shall be clean and square at undamaged tissue. e. Use as much of the existing base rock under the street as possible to avoid disturbing the roots. Where possible raise the street grade within the dripline by adding base rock and ramping over the root zone. f. All demolition and construction within the dripline shall be done using the smallest equipment possible. The arborist will identify where excavation and grading by hand will be required. The equipment shall operate so that it pulls the asphalt away from the tree and parallel to the direction of root growth. g. Do not remove the existing curb where the trunk has grown over it. 2. Monitor the tree for the presence of decay conks and mushrooms. During the spring inspect trees for Ganoderma conks on the lower trunk and buttress roots. Conks are directly attached to tree, reddish brown above and white below. In November and December, following the first rains, inspect for sulfur fungus (Laetiporus gilbertsonir). The bright, yellow conk appears annually and is often found on pruning wounds, wounds and lower trunk. In late December and early January each year inspect for Armillaria mushrooms at the base of tree. The mushrooms are brown to honey color 3. Following storms inspect the tree for cracks in the soil and/or increased lean that may have developed under strong winds. If you have any questions regarding my observations or recommendations, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, MAP A - Michael D. Santos Certified Arborist WE-3877 Registered Consulting Arborist #430 "1\ 411CADVYiAINCED TREE CARE CUTTING EDGE OF ARBORCULTURE ROBERT WEATHERILL, CERTIFIED & CONSULTING ARBORIST April 24, 2007 Kielty Arborist Services P. O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA 94403 Dear Kevin Re: Eucalyptus in front of 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame I visited the site and inspected the eucalyptus canopy. My inspection was carried out from the ground; using an aerial lift provided by Burlingame Parks Department; and climbing the tree with ropes and climbing saddle. Attached is a report of my observations and findings, also enclosed is a CD with all the photos and videos taken during the climb and on the ground. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely Robert' Weatherill ADVANCED TREE CARE P.O. Box 5326 • REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 • PHONE: 650-839-9539 Advanced Tree Care P. Q. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame April 24" 2007 -"N Eucalyptus at 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame An assessment Of the health and condition of the canopy. 4/24/07 Genus and Species: Eucalytpus globulus more commonly known as a blue gum. Size: DBH (Diameter at Standard Height) approximately 85.0 inches; canopy spread 60 feet by 60 feet; height approximately 140 feet; Live Crown Ratio 50% Location: The tree is located in an easement at the front of Easton Branch Library at the corner of Easton Drive and Cabrillo Avenue, Burlingame and can be seen in Photo. 1. Photo. 1: The blue gum Page 2 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24" 2007 Condition: The trunk has a diameter of 82.5 inches at 54 inches above ground level and splits into 3 smaller trunks at approximately 18 feet above ground level; one of these trunks then separates again into 2 smaller trunks. These 4 trunks form the main spars of the tree. The trunk attachments appear strong with no signs of decay or weakness such as included bark. e Photo 2: Attachments of the 4 main trunks Three of the trunks were previously cabled at approximately 65 feet above ground level. The trunks at this height range from 30.0 inches to 35.0 inches in diameter. The cabling system is clearly not to ANSI Standards ANSI A300 (Part 3) - 2000 has failed and is hanging loose. The cabling system can be seen in Photo.3. Page 3 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24`h 2007 Photo. 3: Failed cabling system The live canopy is thick and healthy and begins at approximately 80 feet above ground level. At approximately 80 feet above ground level, there are several large pruning cuts where large spars have been removed. One of these cuts can be seen in Photos. 4 and 5. It can be seen that there is significant decay to a vertical depth of approximately 6 inches after which the wood appears to be quite sound. The stems adjacent to this decay appear to be very strongly attached. No Page 4 of 13 00, Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 246' 2007 Photo. 4: Pruning cut at 80 feet above ground level Photo. 5: Decay at 80 feet above ground level Page 5 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24 h 2007 Again at approximately 120 feet above ground level there are signs of decay from previous pruning cuts. Many of these cuts have callused over as can be seen in Photo 7. There is one or two with visible decay as seen in Photo. 6. Photo. 6: Decay at 120 feet above ground level The decay in the center of the trunk extends down approximately 3 inches before reaching sound wood. At the surface of the trunk the decay extends further down its length. There are several large cuts as shown in Photo. 6 over the Library side of the tree. The growth adjacent to these cuts is predominantly epicormic growth from latent buds. The canopy above 120 feet appears to be healthy with good branch unions. This can be seen in photographs on the following pages. There are no visible cavities on the scaffold limbs or trunk. Throughout the entire canopy are scars from climbing gaffs. Page 6 of 13 m Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24" 2007 Photo. 7: Typical callusing of old pruning cuts at 80 feet above ground level. Page 7 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24 h 2007 —N 00 Photo. 8: Pruning cuts over Library at 120 feet above ground level Page 8 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24" 2007 Photo. 9: Canopy at above 120 feet above ground level Page 9 of 13 Advanced `Free Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24`h 2007 Summary: The canopy is thick and healthy. It has been well maintained in the past. There is some decay throughout the canopy from previous pruning cuts which is actively callusing over. The cabling system has failed but should not be removed. The main scaffold limbs appear to have strong well formed attachments. Some of the growth higher up in the canopy has emanated from epicormic growth and latent buds. Consequently, it must be assumed that these branches are weakly attached to their parent limbs. Recommendations: The tree should be regularly inspected and maintained. Maintenance should involve replacement of the failed cabling system to ANSI Standards ANSI A300 (Part 3) — 2000. Pruning should be carried out at regular intervals or as deemed necessary by a Certified Arborist. Pruning should include both thinning and end weight reduction. "\ Page 10 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24" 2007 Glossary Canopy The part of the crown composed of leaves and small twigs.(2) Cavities An open wound, characterized by the presence of extensive decay and resulting in a hollow.0) Decay Process of degradation of woody tissues by fungi and bacteria through the decomposition of cellulose and lignin(l) Epicormic A shoot that arises from latent or adventitious buds. Watersprouts on growth stems (5) Genus A classification of plants showing similar characteristics. Included A pattern of development at branch junctions where the bark is turned bark inward rather than pushed out and stands in contrast with the branch bark ridge. Live Crown The relative proportion of green crown to overall tree height(') Ratio Species A Classification that identifies a particular plant. Standard Height at which the girth of the tree is measured. Typically 4 %2 feet above height ground level References (1) Matheny, N.P., and Clark, J.P. Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas. International Society of Arboriculture,1994. (2) Harris, R.W., Matheny, N.P. and Clark, J.R.. Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs and Vines. Prentice Hall, 1999. (3) Carlson, Russell E. Paulownia on The Green: An Assessment of Tree Health and Structural Condition. Tree Tech Consulting, 1998. (4) Extracted from a copy of Tree Protection guidelines. Anon (5) T. D. Sydnor, Arboricultural Glossary. School of Natural Resources, 2000 Page 11 of 13 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24 h 2007 --N, Certification of Performance(3) I, Robert Weatherill certify: * That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and/or the property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation and appraisal is stated in the attached report and the Terms and Conditions; * That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; * That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are my own, and are based on current scientific procedures and facts; * That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events; * That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted Arboricultural practices; * That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report. I further certify that I am a member of the International Society of Arboriculture and a Certified Arborist. I hav�been involved in the practice of arboriculture and the care and study of trees for over IV years. Signed f �, y`t Date:,' TO Page 12 of 13 00 Advanced Tree Care 1800 Easton Drive, Burlingame P. O. Box 5326 Redwood City, CA 94063 April 24'11 2007 Terms and Conditions(3) The following terms and conditions apply to all oral and written reports and correspondence pertaining to the consultations, inspections and activities of Advanced Tree Care : 1. All property lines and ownership of property, trees, and landscape plants and fixtures are assumed to be accurate and reliable as presented and described to the consultant, either verbally or in writing. The consultant assumes no responsibility for verification of ownership or locations of property lines, or for results of any actions or recommendations based on inaccurate information. 2. It is assumed that any property referred to in any report or in conjunction with any services performed by Advanced Tree Care, is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations, and that any titles and ownership to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. Any existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded. 3. All reports and other correspondence are confidential, and are the property of Advanced Tree Care and it's named clients and their assigns or agents. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply any right of publication or use for any purpose, without the express permission of the consultant and the client to whom the report was issued. Loss, removal or alteration of any part of a report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation. 4. The scope of any report or other correspondence is limited to the trees and conditions specifically mentioned in those reports and correspondence. Advanced Tree Care and the consultant assume no liability for the failure of trees or parts of trees, either inspected or otherwise. The consultant assumes no responsibility to report on the condition of any tree or landscape feature not specifically requested by the named client. 5. All inspections are limited to visual examination of accessible parts, without dissection, excavation, probing, boring or other invasive procedures, unless otherwise noted in the report. No warrantee or guarantee is made, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or the property will not occur in the future, from any cause. The consultant shall not be responsible for damages caused by any tree defects, and assumes no responsibility for the correction of defects or tree related problems. 6. The consultant shall not be required to provide further documentation, give testimony, be deposed, or attend court by reason of this appraisal/report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of additional fees for such services as described by the consultant or in the fee schedules or contract. 7. Advanced Tree Care no warrantee, either expressed or implied, as to the suitability of the information contained in the reports for any purpose. It remains the responsibility of the client to determine applicability to his/her particular case. 8. Any report and the values, observations, and recommendations expressed therein represent the professional opinion of the consultants, and the fee for services is in no manner contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any particular finding to be reported. 9. Any photographs, diagrams, graphs, sketches, or other graphic material included in any report, being intended solely as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys, unless otherwise noted in the report. Any reproductions of graphs material or the work product of any other persons is intended solely for the purpose of clarification and ease of reference. Inclusion of said information does not constitute a representation by Advanced Tree Care or the consultant as to the sufficiency or accuracy of that information. 10. Payment terms are net payable upon receipt of invoice. All balances due beyond 30 days of invoice date will be charged a service fee of $20.00 per month. All checks returned for insufficient funds or any other reason will be subject to a $20.00 service fee. Advance payment of fees may be required in some cases. Page 13 of 13 1800 Easton Dr./4/23/07 (3) Summary: The three Certified Arborists selected for this project completed their assignment in a timely and professional manner. Their reports describe the work and the testing in a clear and concise manner. As the lead arborist on this project, I was on site for all examinations and excavations. The three arborists hired for this project have discussed and agreed on each others findings. We are also in agreement that at this time there is no need to incorporate additional decay assessment tools. In his report, Michael Santos has outlined tree protection guidelines if road work is to be carried out. I would like to emphasize the importance of having an arborist on site during any excavation near the root zone of this tree. This work can be carried out by the Burlingame staff arborists or by an independent licensed certified arborist. In his report, Robert Weatherill has outlined future pruning specifications. These specifications should be incorporated into future contracts for tree maintenance. The excellent care this tree has received over the years and the diligence of the Burlingame Parks Department has contributed to this large trees favorable report. Continued maintenance of this tree is critical to ensure the health and safety of the tree. Despite the quality of care this tree receives, living near or below large trees has its inherent dangers. This report by no means guarantees the future health or safety of this tree. This report is to be used as a guideline for the City of Burlingame. The information included in these reports is believed to be true and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. The report is intended for use by the City of Burlingame only. Use of this report by others will require permission from the City of Burlingame and the Certified Arborists who have collaborated in the writing of this report. The arborists hired for this assessment have not discussed their findings with unauthorized persons or parties. Sincerely, Kevin R. Kielty Certified Arborist WE#0476A oG\E�Y OF q z `c.RTIFI ED