HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2020.01.06City of Burlingame BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010
. gu .
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Council
Monday, January 6, 2020 7:00 PM Council Chambers
CLOSED SESSION - 6:15 p.m
a. Approval of the Closed Session Agenda
b. Closed Session Community Forum: Members of the Public May Address the Council on
any Item on the Closed Session Agenda at this Time
C. Adjournment into Closed Session
d. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation ( Cal. Govt. Code & 54956 9) one
case: Police Officers' Association and Police Sargeants' Association
Note: Public comment is permitted on all action items as noted on the agenda below and in the
non -agenda public comment provided for in item 7.
Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and
hand it to staff, although the provision of a name, address or other identifying information is
optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each; the Mayor may adjust the time limit in
light of the number of anticipated speakers.
All votes are unanimous unless separately noted for the record.
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
5. UPCOMING EVENTS
6. PRESENTATIONS
a. Measure I Oversight Committee Report
City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 11212020
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final January 6, 2020
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA
Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to
suggest an item for a future Council agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M.
Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the City Council from acting on any matter
that is not on the agenda.
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items are usually approved in a single motion, unless pulled for separate discussion.
Any member of the public wishing to comment on an item listed here may do so by submitting a speaker
slip for that item in advance of the Council's consideration of the consent calendar.
a. Adoption of City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019
Attachments: Meeting Minutes
b. Confirmation of the Mayor's Council Assignments for 2020
Attachments: Staff Report
2020 Council Assignments
C. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services
Agreement with Urban Field Studio for Conceptual Design Options for a Public Plaza on
City Parking Lot E and Coordination with the Development at 220 Park Road (Former
Post Office Site)
Attachments: Staff Report
Resolution
Professional Services Agreement
Exhibit A - Urban Field Studio Scope of Work
d. Open Nomination Period to Fill Two Vacancies on the Measure I Citizens' Oversight
Committee
Attachments: Staff Report
e. Open Nomination Period to Fill One Vacancy on the Planning Commission
Attachments: Staff Report
f. Approval of Library Staff Out of State Travel
Attachments: Staff Report
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Public Comment)
city of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1/2/2020
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final January 6, 2020
a. Public Hearina to Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.36.030. 13.36.040. and
13.40.010 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to Extend the Parking Time Limit from One
Hour to Two Hours and Increase the Parking Meter Rate on Broadway from El Camino
Real to California Drive
Attachments: Staff Report
Ordinance
BMC Update
Broadway BID's Letter
b. Public Hearina to Introduce an Ordinance Amendinq Chapters 13.24.010 and 13.24.015
of the Burlingame Municipal Code to Reduce the Posted Speed Limit on California Drive
between Oak Grove and Peninsula Avenues to 25 MPH
Attachments: Staff Report
Ordinance
BMC Update
10. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS (Public Comment)
a. Consideration of an Enhanced Program to Address Illegal Dumping
Attachments: Staff Report
b. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Amendment of the City Manager's Employment
Agreement to Provide a Salary Increase, and Approving the City of Burlingame Pay Rates
and Ranges (Salary Schedule)
Attachments: Staff Report
Resolution
Contract Amendment
Salary Schedule
11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilmembers report on committees and activities and make announcements.
a. Mayor Beach's Committee Report
Attachments: Committee Report
12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking
Commission, Beautificaiton Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees
are available online at www.burlingame.org.
City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 1/2/2020
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final January 6, 2020
14. ADJOURNMENT
Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at
(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public review at the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and
minutes are available at this site.
NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Next regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
City Council Goal Setting Session - Saturday, January 25, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in the
Lane Room
VIEW REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ONLINE AT www.burlingame.org/video
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda
will be made available for public inspection at the Water Office counter at City Hall at 501 Primrose
Road during normal business hours.
City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 1/2/2020
Agenda Item 8a
Meeting Date:
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting on December 16, 2019
1. CALL TO ORDER
1/06/2020
A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City
Hall Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
The pledge of allegiance was led by Vice Mayor Beach's family.
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O'Brien Keighran, Ortiz
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
5. UPCOMING EVENTS
Mayor Colson reviewed the upcoming events taking place in the city.
6. PRESENTATIONS
a. RECOGNITION OF FIRE CHIEF KAMMEYER'S SERVICE
Mayor Colson called Fire Chief Kammeyer up to the podium and introduced his family that were
in attendance including his wife Jennifer, daughter Cora, two sisters-in-law Melissa and Monica,
and father-in-law Tom and his wife Carol.
Mayor Colson then presented Fire Chief Kammeyer with a proclamation honoring his 20 years
of combined service with the Burlingame Fire Department and Central County Fire Department.
The Council thanked Fire Chief Kammeyer for his service and wished him well on his
retirement.
Burlingame City Council December 16, 2019
Unapproved Minutes
Agenda Item 8a
Meeting Date: 1/06/2020
Fire Chief Kammeyer thanked the men and women of the Central County Fire Department, the
Council, the community, his family, and the staff. Fire Chief Kammeyer recognized City
Manager Goldman for all her support and guidance over the years.
County Supervisor Dave Pine presented Fire Chief Kammeyer with a resolution on behalf of the
County Board of Supervisors.
Hillsborough Councilmember Marie Chuang said a few words about Fire Chief Kammeyer's
service to the community.
b. PROCALAMATION HONORING KERNS FINE JEWELRY ON ITS 75TH
ANNIVERSARY
Mayor Colson presented Kern's Fine Jewelry with a proclamation for their 75th anniversary.
The Councilmembers thanked Kern's Fine Jewelry for their help and dedication to the
community over the years.
The representatives of Kern's Fine Jewelry thanked the Councilmembers and the community for
their continued support.
7. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Salah Abu Bakr from the Muslim community on the Peninsula thanked the Councilmembers
for their work in the community.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Colson asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from
the Consent Calendar. No items were removed.
Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by
Councilmember Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
a. ADOPTION OF THE 2020 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council adopt the 2020 City Council Calendar.
b. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5TH, 2019
City Clerk Hassel -Shearer requested Council adopt Resolution Number 153-2019.
Burlingame City Council December 16, 2019
Unapproved Minutes
Agenda Item 8a
Meeting Date: 1/06/2020
c. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION FOR THE TEMPORARY RECREATION FACILITIES
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW COMMUNITY CENTER AT
AN INSTALLATION COST OF $183,012.30, AND A MONTHLY COST OF
$15,157.84, City Project No. 83240.
Parks and Recreation Director Glomstad requested Council adopt Resolution Number 154-2019.
d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE EASTON ADDITION
SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT WITH CITYWIDE NEIGHBORHOOD
SEWER REHABILITATION, PHASE 4, City Project No. 84192
DPW requested Council adopt Resolution Number 155-2019.
e. ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2019
Finance Director Augustine requested the acceptance of the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
10. STAFF REPORTS
There were no staff reports.
11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS
a. MAYOR COLSON'S COMMITTEE REPORT
b. COUNCILMEMBER KEIGHRAN'S COMMITTEE REPORT
c. COUNCILMEMBER ORTIVS COMMITTEE REPORT
d. COUNCILMEMBER BROWNRIGG'S COMMITTEE REPORT
12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No items were suggested.
13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Burlingame City Council December 16, 2019
Unapproved Minutes
Agenda Item 8a
Meeting Date: 1/06/2020
The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety &
Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and
Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin ag me.org.
14. CEREMONIAL
a. INSTALLATION AND ROTATION OF COUNCILMEMBERS
Mayor Colson began by recognizing Supervisor Dave Pine and Hillsborough Councilmember
Marie Chuang, former Supervisor John Ward, Executive Director of ReThink Waste Joe La
Mariana, Burlingame School District Board of Trustees members Florence Wong and Elizabeth
Kendall, former Mayors Jerry Deal, Terry Nagel, Frank Pagliaro, and Cathy Baylock, former
Councilmembers John Root and Russ Cohen, former Fire Marshal Rocky Yballa, and the many
current and former Burlingame Commissioners that were in attendance.
Next, Mayor Colson and Vice Mayor Beach were sworn in to each serve five-year terms. Mayor
Colson was sworn in by her husband Eric Colson. Vice Mayor Beach was sworn in by her
husband Duff Beach.
Mayor Colson said a few words of thanks to staff, the community, and her colleagues, who
helped her through the year. Next, she reviewed the Council's past year, going over their work
on sustainability, transportation, housing, and infrastructure. Then, she discussed the five
working committees that were established at the Goal Setting Session in January to address:
Broadway Grade Separation; Safety at City Hall; the Rollins Road Neighborhood; El Camino
Real; and Sea Level Rise.
Mayor Colson explained how the Council's rotation worked. She stated that in 1999, the Council
adopted a formal rotation procedure to ensure that each councilmember will become mayor in a
routine, pre -established order. She then introduced Emily Beach as the new Mayor and Ann
O'Brien Keighran as the new Vice Mayor.
Mayor Beach thanked Councilmember Colson for her hard work the last year as Mayor. Then,
each Councilmember said a few words about Councilmember Colson's time as Mayor.
Mayor Beach thanked everyone for being there. She discussed the year ahead, and highlighted
three topics: the rehabilitation of El Camino Real, addressing the need for affordable housing,
and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Beach adjourned the meeting at 8:28pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council December 16, 2019
Unapproved Minutes
BURL AGENDA NO: 8b
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk — (650) 558-7203
Subject: Confirmation of the Mayor's Council Assignments for 2020
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council review, make changes if necessary, and approve the Mayor's
Council assignments for 2020.
Exhibit:
• 2020 Council Assignments
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
2020 COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS — Revised January 6, 2020
Committee
Schedule
Bold names are
members, alternates in
parentheses.
1
ABAG — City Delegate
Annually
Ortiz (Colson)
2
Advanced Life Services (Ambulance)
Meets on the 3rd Wednesday
Keighran (Ortiz)
JPA
of January, May, and
September at 6:30 p.m.
3
Airport Land Use Commission
Meets quarterly at Burlingame
Ortiz (Brownrigg)
(NB: C/CAG subcomm.)
City Hall
4
Anson Burlingame Art Committee
Meets as needed
Beach & Brownrigg
5
Audit Committee
Meets 2-3 times per year,
Colson & Ortiz
including once in December
6
Bay Area Water Supply and
Meets 3rd Thursday of every
O'Mahony
Conservation Agency (BAWSCA)
other month, starting January
7
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Meets as needed
Beach & Colson
Sub -Committee
8
Caltrain Modernization Policymaker
Meets 4th Thursday of each
Beach (Keighran)
Group
month, 5:30 — 7:30 p.m.
9
Central County Fire Board
Meets 4 times a year, generally
Brownrigg & Ortiz
the second Wednesday of
February, April, September,
and December, at 4 p.m.
(NOTE: Minimum 2-year terms.
Brownrigg joined Dec. 2011,
Ortiz appointed January 2018)
10
Chamber of Commerce Liaison
Meets 2nd Tuesday of each
Brownrigg & Colson
month, noon-1:30 p.m.
11
City/County Association of
Meets 2nd Thursday of each
Ortiz (Beach)
Governments (C/CAG)
month, 6:30 p.m.
12
City/Schools Liaison Committee
Meets 3 times a year, usually
Colson & Ortiz
midweek at 9 a.m.
13
Commute.org (formerly called
Meets every other month on
Beach (Keighran)
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance)
Thursday at 8 a.m.
14
Commute.org Strategic Plan
Meets monthly
Beach
Committee
15
Community Center Advisory
Meets as needed
Colson & Ortiz
Committee
16
Dog Park Advisory Group
Meets as needed
Colson & Keighran
17
Economic Development
Meets 2nd Wednesday of the
Keighran & Ortiz
Subcommittee
month, 8:15 a.m.
18
El Camino Real Task Force
Meets as needed
Beach & Brownrigg
19
Emergency Services Council
Meets 3rd Thursday in January,
Keighran (Beach)
(quarterly)
April, June and September,
5:30 p.m. at Hall of Justice in
Redwood City
20
Enterprise Property Committee
Brownrigg & Colson
21
Grand Boulevard Task Force
Meeting Dates TBA
Beach (Brownrigg)
22
Home For All
Meets monthly
Colson & Keighran
23
Housing Endowment and Regional
Meets quarterly on
Brownrigg (Ortiz)
Trust (HEART)
Wednesdays at 3 p.m.
24
Measure I Oversight Committee
Meets 2-3 times a year
Colson & Ortiz
25
Parks Master Plan Committee
Meets as needed
Colson & Ortiz
26
Peninsula Cities Consortium
Meets quarterly, 8:15 a.m.
Keighran (Beach)
(location rotates among 6
cities)
27
Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE)
Meets 4th Thursday of every
Colson (Brownrigg)
month , 7 p.m. at 400 Harbor
Boulevard, Belmont
28
Post Office / Town Square Advisory
Meets as needed
Brownrigg & Colson
Group
29
SFO Community Round Table
Meets quarterly on 1st
Ortiz (Brownrigg)
Wednesday each month at 7
p.m.
30
South Bay Waste Management
Meets quarterly, 2 p.m.,
Brownrigg (Keighran)
Authority
Thursdays
31
South Bay Waste Management
Meets as needed
Brownrigg
Authority's Zero Waste Working
Group
32
South Bay Waste Management
Meets three times a year
Brownrigg
Authority's Finance Committee
HIGH PRIORITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 GOAL -
SETTING SESSION/ APPOINTED BY MAYOR
33
Broadway Grade Separation
Meets as needed
Beach & Ortiz
34
City Hall Modernization and Safety
Meets as needed
Keighran & Ortiz
Improvements
35
Specific Plan for Rollins Road
Meets as needed
Colson & Keighran
36
Sea Level Rise Shoreline Protection
Meets as needed
Brownrigg & Colson
Improvements
37
Underground Power Lines on El
Meets as needed
Beach & Brownrigg
Camino Real
MEMBERS ELECTED/APPOINTED NOT BY THE MAYOR
38
C/CAG Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory
Meets 6-7 times a year,
Beach
Committee (BPAC)
Thursdays, 7-9 p.m. at San
Mateo City Hall
39
C/CAG Congestion Management and
Meets 4" Monday of every
Beach
Environmental Quality Committee
month, 3-5 p.m. at San Mateo
(CMEQ)
City Hall
40
Council of Cities Domestic Violence
Meets quarterly
Keighran (alternate)
Council
41
League of California Cities Peninsula
Meets January 24, April 3, June
Beach
Division Environmental Quality
5, October 7, 2020
Policy Committee
42
League of California Cities Peninsula
Meets monthly on Mondays
Beach (Peninsula
Division Executive Board
Division State Board
Member)
43
League of California Cities State
Meets February 20-21 April 23,
Beach (Peninsula
Board of Directors
June 21-22, October 7-9 and
Division State Board
December 2-4
Member)
44
Peninsula Clean Energy Executive
Meets monthly
Colson
Committee
45
Peninsula Clean Energy Audit and
Meets monthly
Colson
Finance Committee
46
Peninsula Health Care District Long
Meets 6 times a year, generally
Brownrigg & Ortiz
Term Planning Committee
Tuesday evenings
47
San Mateo County Express Lane
Meets monthly on 2nd Fridays
Beach
Joint Powers Authority
at SamTrans HQ in San Carlos,
9:00a.m. to 10:30a.m.
48
San Mateo County Express Lane
Meets as needed
Beach
Joint Powers Authority Finance
Committee
49
San Mateo County Flood and Sea
Meets the 2nd Monday of the
Colson (North County
Level Rise Resiliency District
month at 4:00 p.m. at San
Representative)
Mateo City Hall
50
San Mateo County Office of
Meets February 5, April 2, June
Beach
Education Safe Routes to Schools
4 at 9:00 a.m.
Community Advisory Committee
51
San Mateo County Housing and
Meets as need, 4-6 times a
Colson
Development Committee
year, 3 year term 2016-2019
52
San Mateo County Transportation
Meets 1st Thursday of every
Beach (cities at large)
Authority Board of Directors
month, 5 p.m. at SAMTRANS
office in San Carlos
53
SFO Community Round Table
Meets as needed
Ortiz
Subcommittee on Ground -Based
Noise
ALL COUNCILMEMBERS MAY ATTEND THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS
54
Council of Cities
Meets usually 4th Friday of
All
month, rotating City
55
Peninsula Division League of
Meets quarterly lunch on
All
California Cities
Wednesdays, plus January
reception for newly elected
councilmembers
BURL�E AGENDA NO: 8c
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a
Professional Services Agreement with Urban Field Studio for Conceptual
Design Options for a Public Plaza on City Parking Lot E and Coordination
with the Development at 220 Park Road (Former Post Office Site)
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council is asked to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with Urban Field Studio for conceptual design options for a
public plaza on City Parking Lot E and coordination with the development at 220 Park Road
(former Post Office Site) in Downtown Burlingame.
BACKGROUND
The City of Burlingame entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Burlingame
Park Square LLC in 2015 for a development proposal that would encompass both the 220 Park
Road property (aka Post Office site) and Parking Lot E. The previous development project
included a public plaza within the portion of Lot E fronting on Park Road. The Community
Development Department circulated a Request for Proposals (RFP) in February 2019 to five
urban design and landscape design firms to peer review the proposed design concept for the
public plaza that was going to be part of the development project that included Parking Lot E and
the former Post Office site. The City received two proposals and, following interviews, selected
Urban Field Studio for the study.
The ENA expired in September, and the previous development proposal has become inactive.
Since then, the property owner of the former Post Office has engaged developer Sares Regis on
a new development proposal for adaptive reuse of the Post Office site. The revised development
project will no longer include City Parking Lot E; however, it is the City's intent to create a public
plaza on Lot E that would interface with the revised development of the Post Office property and
serve as a focal point for Burlingame's downtown.
DISCUSSION
Given that Parking Lot E is no longer directly part of the Post Office development project, staff
requested a revised proposal from Urban Field Studio (attached) that focuses on the development
of conceptual design options for a public plaza on Parking Lot E. This work will include public
Professional Services Agreement with Urban Field Studio January 6, 2020
participation and the development of design concepts for the public plaza that will become a
community amenity. In addition to a public plaza, concepts for the northern portion of Parking Lot
J along Park Road and a portion of Lot E will be considered for potential development as part of
this study. The study will consider the relationship of the public plaza to the adjacent buildings
facing (and backing onto) Lot E, as well as coordination with the proposed development of the
Post Office site.
The project is in the core of Burlingame's downtown and presents a rare opportunity to create a
focal point for Downtown Burlingame. The plaza is intended to be "Burlingame's Living Room,"
providing a public gathering space in an inviting environment. The plaza could include areas for
both active and passive enjoyment, with the goal to ensure that the space is properly suited for
downtown events and gatherings. The development of a downtown square/plaza was envisioned
as part of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan that was adopted in 2010.
The former Post Office borders the new plaza on one side. The Post Office building has been
determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under
Criteria A (events) and C (design/construction). A preservation covenant ensures that historic or
character -defining elements of the property will be retained, including the lobby structure of the
building (both interior and exterior), the primary building facade facing Park Road, and the exterior
artwork including the bronze relief over the entrance doors. Any adaptive re -use of the building
must retain and incorporate these elements, and they will represent a significant influence on the
plaza design and layout. Due to the site's prominent location in the downtown, it is critical that
the project provide an aesthetic that is both vibrant and interesting, but also integrates with the
existing character of the historic elements of the Post Office building. In addition, there is interest
in having the design of the plaza complement and possibly reference the recent streetscape
improvements on Burlingame Avenue, but not necessarily be identical.
The revised scope of work from Urban Field Studio reflects these goals and includes a team of
professionals with expertise in urban design as well as landscape design, engineering, and
economics. The proposal includes a comprehensive public participation and outreach
component, which will help assist the community in articulating the types of uses and
programming envisioned for the plaza as well as design concepts. This team will work
collaboratively with Sares Regis to ensure that the development at the Post Office site
complements and integrates with the development of Parking Lot E and the plaza. The attached
Urban Field Studio proposal details these steps with a process that works with the community to
develop conceptual design alternatives, and ultimately a preferred plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
The professional services agreement for the above detailed work will be directly with the City of
Burlingame, as the property owner of Parking Lot E. Attached is a draft Agreement for
Professional Services with Urban Field Studio to provide public outreach, conceptual design
options for a public plaza on City Parking Lot E, and coordination with the proposed development
at 220 Park Road (Post Office Site) in an amount not to exceed $298,800. As spending on this
project will cross fiscal years, staff recommends that mid -year funding for the agreement be
established in the capital projects fund.
2
Professional Services Agreement with Urban Field Studio January 6, 2020
In preliminary discussions with staff and members of the Post Office subcommittee,
representatives of Sares Regis have indicated they would be agreeable to funding a pro -rated
share of the plaza project should a development proposal for the Post Office site be approved in
the future.
Exhibits:
• Resolution
• Draft Agreement for Professional Services with Urban Field Studio
• Scope of Work — Urban Field Studio Proposal for Burlingame Public Plaza & Context Design
3
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH URBAN FIELD STUDIO FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
OPTIONS FOR A PUBLIC PLAZA ON CITY PARKING LOT E AND COORDINATION
WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AT 220 PARK ROAD (POST OFFICE SITE),
BURLINGAME
WHEREAS, the City circulated a Request for Proposals (RFP) to five urban design
and landscape design firms to peer review the proposed design concept for a public plaza
that was anticipated to be part of the development project that included Parking Lot E and
the former Post Office site at 220 Park Road; and
WHEREAS, the City received two proposals, and, following interviews, selected
Urban Field Studio for the plaza work; and
WHEREAS, while the previous proposal for the combined development of Lot E and
220 Park Road has become inactive, the City maintains the goal of creating a downtown
square/public plaza as envisioned in the Downtown Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, while any adaptive reuse/development of the former Post Office at 220
Park Road will be proposed separately from the City's potential development of a public
plaza on Parking Lot E, it is in the interest of both initiatives to coordinate the design
development of the projects so that they may be complementary and beneficial to the
Downtown district; and
WHEREAS, the City requested a revised proposal from Urban Field Studio to
provide public outreach, conceptual design options for a public plaza on City Parking Lot
E, and coordination with the proposed development at 220 Park Road (Post Office Site),
and an agreement has been prepared incorporating these tasks in the revised proposal
prepared by Urban Field Studio in the amount of $298,800.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to enter into a Professional Services
Agreement with Urban Field Studio for conceptual design options for a public plaza
on City Parking Lot E and coordination with the development at 220 Park Road
(former Post Office Site).
2. An appropriation of $300,000 is hereby established within the City's Capital Project
Fund to provide funding for the agreement and related activities.
3. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the City Manager upon
execution of the Professional Services Agreement.
Emily Beach, Mayor
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the 6"'
day of January, 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
2
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AND URBAN FIELD STUDIO
THIS AGREEMENT is by and between Urban Field Studio ("Consultant") and the City
of Burlingame, a public body of the State of California ("City"). Consultant and City agree:
1. Services. Consultant shall provide public outreach, conceptual design options for a
public plaza on City Parking Lot E and coordination with the proposed development at 220 Park
Road (Post Office Site), as further set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
2. Compensation. Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and
materials in excess of said Maximum compensation amount, Consultant agrees to perform all of
the Scope of Services herein required of Consultant for $298,800.00, including all materials and
other reimbursable amounts ("Maximum Compensation"), for development of conceptual design
options for a public plaza and its context on City owned Parking Lot E and coordination with the
proposed development at 220 Park Road (Post Office Site), Burlingame. Consultant shall submit
invoices on a monthly basis. All bills submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient
information to determine whether the amount deemed due and payable is accurate. Bills shall
include a brief description of services performed, the date services were performed, the number
of hours spent and by whom, a brief description of any costs incurred and the Consultant's
signature.
3. Term. This Agreement commences on full execution hereof and terminates on
December 31, 2021, unless otherwise extended or terminated pursuant to the provisions hereof.
Consultant agrees to diligently prosecute the services to be provided under this Agreement to
completion and in accordance with any schedules specified herein. In the performance of this
Agreement, time is of the essence. Time extensions for delays beyond the Consultant's control,
other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract
Administrator prior to the expiration of the specified completion date.
4. Assignment and Subcontracting. A substantial inducement to City for entering
into this Agreement is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Neither this
Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or subcontracted by Consultant without the
prior written approval of City. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that
Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City.
5. Insurance. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall carry, maintain for the
duration of the Agreement, and provide proof thereof, acceptable to the City, the insurance
coverages specified in Exhibit B, "City Insurance Requirements," attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of required insurance
coverage prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of
Certificates of Insurance to City.
6. Indemnification. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold City, its directors,
officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against any and all liability,
claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of, pertaining or relating to the
negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors, or
agents, or on account of the performance or character of the Services, except for any such claim
arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, employees,
agents, or volunteers. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold
harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in section 2778 of the California Civil Code.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for any design professional services, the duty to defend and
indemnify City shall be limited to that allowed pursuant to California Civil Code section 2782.8.
Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not
relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This
indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall
have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.
7. Termination and Abandonment. This Agreement may be cancelled at any time
by City for its convenience upon written notice to Consultant. In the event of such termination,
Consultant shall be entitled to pro -rated compensation for authorized Services performed prior to
the effective date of termination provided however that City may condition payment of such
compensation upon Consultant's delivery to City of any or all materials described herein. In the
event the Consultant ceases performing services under this Agreement or otherwise abandons the
project prior to completing all of the Services described in this Agreement, Consultant shall,
without delay, deliver to City all materials and records prepared or obtained in the performance
of this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid for the reasonable value of the authorized Services
performed up to the time of Consultant's cessation or abandonment, less a deduction for any
damages or additional expenses which City incurs as a result of such cessation or abandonment.
8. Ownership of Materials. All documents, materials, and records of a finished
nature, including but not limited to final plans, specifications, video or audio tapes, photographs,
computer data, software, reports, maps, electronic files and films, and any final revisions,
prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, shall be delivered to and become the
property of City. All documents and materials of a preliminary nature, including but not limited
to notes, sketches, preliminary plans, computations and other data, and any other material
referenced in this Section, prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, shall be
made available, upon request, to City at no additional charge and without restriction or limitation
on their use. Upon City's request, Consultant shall execute appropriate documents to assign to
the City the copyright or trademark to work created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall
return all City property in Consultant's control or possession immediately upon termination.
9. Compliance with Laws. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall
abide by and conform to any and all applicable laws of the United States and the State of
California, and all ordinances, regulations, and policies of the City. Consultant warrants that all
work done under this Agreement will be in compliance with all applicable safety rules, laws,
statutes, and practices, including but not limited to Cal/OSHA regulations. If a license or
registration of any kind is required of Consultant, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by
law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and
Consultant shall keep it in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and that any
applicable bond shall be posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
10. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and covenants that Consultant presently
has no interest in, nor shall any interest be hereinafter acquired in, any matter which will render
the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable state,
local, or federal law. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter
arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that
the City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its
compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 81000 et seq.) respecting this
Agreement.
11. Whole Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the entire
understanding and Agreement of the parties and integrates all of the terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersedes all negotiations or any previous written or
oral Agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.
The parties intend not to create rights in, or to grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary
of this Agreement or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein. This
Agreement may be amended only by a written document, executed by both Consultant and the
City Manager, and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Such document shall expressly
state that it is intended by the parties to amend certain terms and conditions of this Agreement.
The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not
constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a
different provision of this Agreement. Multiple copies of this Agreement may be executed but
the parties agree that the Agreement on file in the office of the City Clerk is the version of the
Agreement that shall take precedence should any differences exist among counterparts of the
document. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California.
12. Capacity of Parties. Each signatory and party hereto warrants and represents to
the other party that it has all legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter
into this Agreement and that all necessary actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into
this Agreement.
13. Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be declared by a final decision
by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid, or beyond the
authority of either party to enter into or carry out, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the
remainder of this Agreement, absent the unexcised portion, can be reasonably interpreted to give
effect to the intentions of the parties.
14. Notice. Any notice required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be
in writing and shall be personally served or, in lieu of personal service, may be given by (i)
depositing such notice in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested,
postage prepaid, addressed to a party at its address set forth in Exhibit A; (ii) transmitting such
notice by means of Federal Express or similar overnight commercial courier ("Courier"), postage
paid and addressed to the other at its street address set forth below; (iii) transmitting the same by
facsimile, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon confirmation of receipt by the
sending facsimile machine's acknowledgment of such with date and time printout; or (iv) by
personal delivery. Any notice given by Courier shall be deemed given on the date shown on the
receipt for acceptance or rejection of the notice. Either party may, by written notice, change the
address to which notices addressed to it shall thereafter be sent.
15. Miscellaneous. Except to the extent that it provides a part of the definition of the
term used herein, the captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be
considered in the construction of interpretation of any provision hereof, nor taken as a correct or
complete segregation of the several units of materials and labor.
Capitalized terms refer to the definition provide with its first usage in the Agreement.
When the context of this Agreement requires, the neuter gender includes the masculine,
the feminine, a partnership or corporation, trust or joint venture, and the singular includes the
plural.
The terms "shall", "will", "must" and "agree" are mandatory. The term "may" is
permissive.
The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement
shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same
or a different provision of this Agreement.
When a party is required to do something by this Agreement, it shall do so at its sole cost
and expense without right to reimbursement from the other party unless specific provision is
made otherwise.
Where any party is obligated not to perform any act, such party is also obligated to
restrain any others within its control from performing such act, including its agents, invitees,
contractors, subcontractors and employees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant and City execute this Agreement.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Date:
Attest:
Lisa K. Goldman
City Manager
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer
City Clerk
URBAN FIELD STUDIO
2169 Folsom Street, M 304
San Francisco, CA 94110
By:
Heidi Sokolowsky
Founding Partner
Date:
Federal Employer ID Number:
License Number:
Expiration Date:
Approved as to form:
Kathleen Kane
City Attorney
Attachments:
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Exhibit B City Insurance Provisions
EXHIBIT A
Urban Field Studio Scope of Work
Mll1lil��i
To: Mr. Kevin Gardiner
Community Development Director
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 92010
From: Frank Fuller, Partner, FAIA, Partner
Heidi Sokolowsky, Partner
Urban Field Studio
December 30, 2019 - D R A F T
Subject: Revised Proposal for Burlingame Public Plaza & Context Design
Dear Kevin,
Urban Field Studio (UFS) is pleased to present an updated proposal to you for the development of
conceptual design options for a public plaza and its context, primarily on City owned Parking Lot E and a
portion of Lot J. This revised proposal follows our scoping meeting with you, City staff, and the City
Council Sub -Committee members on October 28, 2019. In addition, we are responding to comments in
your December 2nd email from your meeting with the Sub -Committee in response to our revised
proposal of November 15th. The scope of work includes concepts for a public plaza, as well as concepts
for possible development of portions of Parking Lot E and the northern portion of Parking Lot J along
Park Road. Also, the study will consider the relationships of the public plaza to the adjacent buildings
that currently front onto Burlingame Avenue, Park Road and Lorton Avenue, as well as coordination with
proposed development on the Post Office site. Community engagement and working with you, your
staff, and the Council Sub -Committee are integrated in the scope throughout the duration of the
project. Urban Field Studio is flexible concerning changes that might occur during the project, so that
our scope could be refined further to address new conditions, timing and budget needs.
Our team composition will remain the same as in our original proposal except for Page & Turnbull, who
may directly advise the new development team of the Post Office parcel adjacent to Lot E. Page &
Turnbull will advise the Sares-Regis Group with regards to historic preservation issues and thus is not
anticipated to be included in our team. SWA, BKF and Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) are the sub -
consultants to Urban Field Studio.
We propose the following revised tasks, including estimated costs and duration (please see attached
Urban Field Studio Rate Schedule and draft "Proposed Tentative Schedule"). The duration of each task
is the amount of time for the Urban Field team to perform the tasks or to complete deliverable products
and does not include time necessary for scheduling, arranging and reviewing.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 1. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Task 1: Project Initiation & Existing Conditions
Urban Field Studio (Urban Field or UFS) and the sub -consultant team will start with an initial kick-off
meeting and site tour with the City Staff. At the kick-off meeting, we will attempt to confirm all meeting
dates and milestones in the schedule, so that as much as possible, the project will conform to the
proposed schedule. We will prepare a request for available documents such as parcel maps, utility
drawings, property ownership information, and other relevant information, which we will review and
use to determine existing conditions and constraints as well as applicable regulations. Based on the
information provided, we will document existing conditions including surrounding uses and building
heights as well as any planned projects that are known to date. We will summarize the existing
conditions in a memorandum.
Task 1:
Duration: A total of 6 weeks for the UFS I SWA team
Deliverables: Existing Conditions Memorandum
Context diagram, to -scale; site analysis plan diagram, to -scale; photos of existing
conditions
Team Members: UFS, SWA, BKF, KMA
Estimated Cost: $26,120 + reimbursable expenses & administration
Task 2: Public and Stakeholder Participation
Introductory Meeting
A Public Community Meeting #1 will be held after the project initiation of Task 1 to introduce the project
and its relation to current development planning of Post Office site. A brief presentation of the project,
the site, the surroundings and comparable projects will be made by Urban Field. Questions and
clarifications will be made by the City and Urban Field. The City will make arrangements, conduct
outreach, and book the venue for the meeting.
Stakeholders Meetings
Once the Urban Field team has developed up to three conceptual alternatives for the public plaza and
surroundings, we will share them with key stakeholders in one-on-one meetings and ask about any
stakeholders' plans for improvements or development, as well as issues they foresee. The City will
compile a list of stakeholders and contact them ahead of time in order to coordinate the meetings.
Stakeholders could include property owners, including the owners of the Post Office parcels as well as
owners lining Parking Lots E and J. Urban Field has estimated that we will conduct a maximum of five
individual stakeholder meetings, and that the meetings will be scheduled on one day in Burlingame.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 2. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Community Meetings
Following the stakeholders meeting, we will conduct Public Community Meetings #2 and #3 to introduce
up to three conceptual options. We will present the same concepts and presentation materials at the
two meetings, giving the community two opportunities to attend a meeting at a different time and place
to participate and comment on the conceptual options. We will prepare a presentation to inform about
the planning intent and process, and explain how we arrived at the conceptual alternatives for the
public plaza and surroundings. We will seek input from the community using break-out sessions that
can be organized by alternatives or by themes.
Up to three informal public outreach events will be held at the Farmers Market and as possible, at two
other events, Music in the Park and Art on the Avenue, with a staffed stand and information boards.
People will have the opportunity to comment on the options, fill out a survey, and provide additional
ideas. The three conceptual options will be shown at each of the community events; the same concepts
and presentation materials will be displayed for comments at all the events.
The feedback received at these events, in addition to feedback from stakeholders, City Staff and the
Council Sub -Committee, will inform the development of a preferred alternative concept. The
documented feedback and the preferred alternative concept will be presented at a Public Community
Meeting #4, which will be another opportunity for the community to provide comments. The fourth
community meeting is intended to build consensus and to prioritize design and programmatic ideas for
implementation.
Task 2:
Duration: Throughout the project (please see Proposed Tentative Schedule), including five
(5) individual stakeholder meetings on one to two days, four (4) public
community meetings, and three (3) community events
Team Members: UFS, SWA & KMA
Deliverables: Documentation of meetings, survey, presentation materials and informational
boards, plaza graphic materials for boards
Estimated Costs: $85,230 + reimbursable expenses & administration
Task 3: Coordination with Developer Team
In order to design and program a successful public plaza that serves the community and is spatially well
integrated, it is essential to coordinate design efforts with the development team of the adjacent Post
Office site. We propose to have a 3 to 4 hour charrette-style meeting with the developer team after the
first conceptual ideas for the public plaza have been developed. This meeting should be followed by up
to three additional meetings during the public plaza project to share the planning progress on both
parcels and to provide the opportunity for continuous coordination.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 3. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Task 3:
Duration: A total of 12 weeks for the UFS I SWA team; 1st meeting after initial conceptual
plaza alternatives, timing of following meetings in coordination with both
project's progress
Deliverables: Sketches and notes during meetings
Team Members: UFS and SWA
Estimated Costs: $13,450 + reimbursable expenses & administration
Task 4: Conceptual Design Alternatives for Public Plaza
First Conceptual Ideas
Immediately following Task 1, UFS and SWA will begin to work on up to five (5) diagrammatic
alternatives for the Public Plaza that take into account possible connections, development
opportunities, plaza edges and relationships, and options for spatial and programmatic organization of
the plaza. After a meeting with City staff and the Council Sub -Committee, we will use the diagrammatic
alternatives as a basis for a charrette-type meeting with the development team for the Post Office site.
Conceptual Alternatives
Based on the results of the charrette and input from City Staff and Council Sub -Committee, UFS and
SWA will narrow the options to a maximum of three (3) conceptual alternatives. The alternatives will be
illustrated in plans and basic digital three dimensional models that convey the main elements of the
plaza, its proportions and relationship to its context. Keyser Marston will assist with high-level economic
analysis, including providing estimates of vertical construction costs for revenue -generating
development on Lot E and a portion of Lot J. Other considerations could include potential underground
parking arrangements for the proposed development on the Post Office parcel. SWA will give high-level
estimate of construction costs for the horizontal construction of the plaza. BKF will help determine
potential impacts and solutions for the existing culvert and other utilities, as well as their high-level
order of magnitude construction cost estimates. The UFS I SWA team will present up to three
alternatives in a meeting with the Council Sub -Committee and City Staff and subsequently make one
round of refinements.
Preferred Alternative Concept
The refined alternatives will be introduced at the Public Community Meetings #2 and #3, as well as more
informally at public events, such as the Farmers Market (please also refer to Task 4, Public and
Stakeholder Outreach and Participation). Based upon the input from the Council Sub -Committee, City
Staff, stakeholders and community events, UFS and SWA will create a preferred alternative concepts
that may combine components of one, two, or all the previous conceptual alternatives. The preferred
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 4. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
alternative will be illustrated in plan format and a conceptual digital three dimensional model; it will be
presented with precedent examples that show envisioned elements, materials, and programming. BKF
will provide input regarding requirements for utilities and disposition of the culvert in the preferred
alternative as well as high-level order of magnitude construction cost estimates. SWA will give high-
level estimate of construction costs for the plaza. Keyser Marston will prepare a high-level economic
analysis of the preferred alternative that includes vertical costs for potential revenue -generating
development and will suggest funding sources for implementation. The preferred alternative will be
presented at the Public Community Meeting #4. The preferred alternative, as well as the input from the
community and stakeholders, will be documented in a summary report.
Project Summary Report
Following the creation of the Preferred Concept Alternative and Public Meeting #4 for the Public Plaza
and surrounding context, Urban Field and SWA will produce a draft report which briefly summarizes the
products and process of the project. A meeting with the City Staff will meet with the team (meeting #8),
review and make comments, which will be included in a final draft report to be presented to the third
and final meetings of the Planning Commission and City Council.
For the two phases of conceptual alternatives, for the preferred alternative concept, and for the
summary report, the Urban Field I SWA team will make one round of modifications and refinements, if
necessary. The modifications will be based upon a consolidated set of comments from the Council Sub -
Committee and City Staff, which will be assembled by the City Staff and transmitted to the team.
Task 4:
Duration:
Deliverables:
URBAN FIELD STUDIO
2169 Folsom Street, M 304
San Francisco, CA 94110
Throughout the project (please see Proposed Tentative Schedule)
First Ideas: UFS and SWA will produce sketches of up to five (5) overall concepts
including connectivity, uses, and edges; hand drawn plan diagrams (up to 3) of
the plaza context, plaza form, with 1-2 site sections and design reference
images;
Conceptual Alternatives: Digital plans and basic 3-D models for up to three (3)
alternatives, including immediate context and massing of potential
development; hand drawn plans (up to 3) and associated sections (one per
alternative) for plaza context, plaza form, and plaza program and use scenarios;
plus design reference images.
Preferred Alternative Concept: Digital 3-D model with immediate context and
massing of proposed development; digital site plan of plaza, Sketchup model of
plaza for input into overall model, and plaza program and use scenarios; plus
design reference images.
Project Summary Report: A brief report will be created to summarize the
process, the alternative concepts and the preferred alternative concept. A
415.754.9304
info@urbanfieldstudio.com
www.urbanfieldstudio.com
Page 5. DRAFT
December 30, 2019
Revised Proposal
digital version of the report in InDesign and pdf formats, as well as two (2)
printed copies, will be submitted to the City.
Team Members: UFS, SWA, BKF, KMA
Deliverables: 2 Memoranda, presentation materials for conceptual alternatives for the Public
Plaza and surroundings, summary report
EstimateclCosts: $84,660 + reimbursable expenses & administration
Task 5: Meetings with the City
Meetings with City Staff
We anticipate eight in -person, conference call or GoToMeeting type meetings with City staff including
the project initiation meeting. Three of the eight meetings will be with the Council Sub -Committee and
will be in person. The meetings will include:
Meeting #1: Project initiation meeting, as described in Task 1.
Meeting #2: A meeting with the Council Sub -Committee to evaluate Public Meeting #1, to
discuss first diagrammatic plaza ideas, up to five, and to provide direction for the
subsequent three conceptual alternatives.
Meeting #3: A meeting to review progress on alternative concepts and to plan the continuation
of the public engagement events, including stakeholder interviews.
Meeting #4: A meeting to present three conceptual alternatives for input and refinement. This
meeting occurs before the meetings with the Council Subcommittee, the
stakeholders, and the community. This can be a joint meeting with Council
Subcommittee.
Meeting #S: A meeting to discuss input from stakeholder meetings and to plan public events
and Public Meetings #2 and #3 to consider up to three alternatives.
Meeting #6: A meeting to discuss input from stakeholder meetings, Public Meetings 42 and #3,
and to plan Planning Commission and City Council work sessions to consider up to
three alternatives and to help determine the direction for a preferred concept.
Meeting #7: A meeting to review the preferred alternative and to plan for Public Meeting #4
about the preferred alternative concept. This can be a joint meeting with Council
Subcommittee.
Meeting #8: A meeting to review the preferred alternative concept and the draft report.
Comments and preparations will be considered for meetings of the full Planning
Commission and City Council concerning presentation of the final summary report.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 6. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Meetings with Council Sub -Committee
We anticipate three in -person meetings with the City Council Sub -Committee. The meetings will occur at
the following project stages:
Meeting #1: A meeting to present up to five (5) diagrammatic conceptual ideas for the public
plaza and surrounding context. The goal of the meeting would be to narrow the
ideas to not more than three for discussion at events and meetings that follow.
This can be a joint meeting with City staff (see City Staff Meeting #2 above).
Meeting #2: A meeting to present up to three conceptual alternatives along with the first
diagrammatic ideas for input on refinement. This can be a joint meeting with City
staff (see City Staff Meeting #4 above).
Meeting #3: A meeting to present the preferred alternative for input and refinement. This can
be a joint meeting with city staff (see City Staff Meeting #7 above).
It is assumed that SWA, KMA and BKF will attend the Initial project meeting. It is assumed that SWA will
participate in the three meetings with the City Staff and Council Sub -Committee and that Keyser
Marston and BKF will each participate in one Staff and one Council Sub -Committee meeting.
Meetings with the Parks and Recreation Commission
Urban Field and SWA will meet twice with the Parks and Recreation Commission. We propose that the
first meeting follow Public Meetings #2 and #3 about the alternative concepts, using the presentation
from those meetings, and before the Planning Commission and City Council meetings #2 and #3 (please
see the Proposed Tentative Schedule). Information from the first Commission meeting would be used
by the Urban Field I SWA team to inform the preparation of the preferred alternative concept. The
second meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission would be scheduled to review and comment
upon the draft preferred alternative concept and the draft report for the project. We propose that the
second meeting be scheduled before the Planning Commission and the City Council meetings #4 and #5.
We have assumed that SWA will attend both meetings of the Parks and Recreation Commission and BKF
will attend one meeting.
Meetings with Planning Commission and City Council
We will assist City Staff with providing materials for two Planning Commission meetings and two City
Council meetings (meetings #2 through #5), one each after alternative concepts are developed and
considered in Public Meetings #2 and #3, and one each at the end of the project to consider the draft
report with the preferred alternative concept. In addition, Urban Field and SWA also will attend one
joint Commission and Council meeting (meeting #1) to review City issues, a joint meeting which is held
each Spring. It is assumed that Urban Field will attend all meetings of the full Commission and Council.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 7. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 w .urbanfieldsmdio.com Revised Proposal
The proposal assumes that SWA will attend two meetings with each of the Planning Commission and
City Council and one joint meeting of the Commission and Council; Keyser Marston will attend one
meeting.
Task 5:
Duration:
Team Members
Deliverables:
Estimated Costs
Optional Tasks
Throughout the project (please see Proposed Tentative Schedule)
UFS, SWA, BKF, KMA
Preparation of meeting materials and participation in the meetings
$56,730 + reimbursable expenses & administration
We understand that goals and needs can change over the course of the project. We have considered
the following tasks that may arise and that the team is prepared to provide as needed. The costs listed
below are estimates (rounded to the nearest $1,000) and would need to be refined based on
confirmation of a detailed scope. Optional Tasks would be billed in accordance with individual
consultant's rate sheets.
1. Task 6.1 Allowance for 2 plaza renderings from eye -level viewpoints
Estimate of Costs: $10,000
2. Task 6.2 Participation and attendance of Urban Field and SWA team members at additional
public meetings (not including preparation of presentation materials); meetings are assumed to
be in Burlingame:
Estimate of Costs: $7,000 per meeting
3. Task 6.3 Schematic Design drawings of Plaza (SWA would be prime consultant and under a
separate contract)
Estimate of Costs: $75,330
4. Task 6.4 Civil Engineering and Site Survey (BKF would be under a separate contract)
Estimate of Costs: $45,180
5. Task 6.5 Preparation of detailed economic analysis or project proforma of development in
surrounding properties
Estimate of Costs: $7,180
6. Task 6.6 Peer review of a proposed development, which would be in addition to the Post Office
site, including one meeting in Burlingame
Estimate of Costs: $8,630
URBAN FIELD STUDIO
2169 Folsom Street, M 304
San Francisco, CA 94110
415.754.9304
info@urbanfieldstudio.com
www.urbanfieldstudio.com
Page 8. DRAFT
December 30, 2019
Revised Proposal
7. Task 6.7 Products, management, and participation in meetings for environmental impacts and
review (EIR process) of the Public Plaza and development surrounding the Plaza, including
proposed development on the Post Office site. It is assumed that environmental review
documentation will be for a combination of the proposed development on the Post Office site
and the Preferred Alternative Concept for the Public Plaza.
Estimate of Costs: (Allowance) $20,000
8. Task 6.8 Replacement parking, which could be displaced from City parking lots, to be studied by
a parking consultant to determine how many spaces, types of spaces, and parking replacement
facilities.
Estimate of Costs: (Allowance) $20,000
Proposed Tentative Schedule
The overall time allowed to complete the project for a preferred public plaza concept, including
coordination with proposed development on the Post Office site and a public engagement process is
estimated to be forty-five (45) weeks. During the process there will be periods of time when the City
will be the primary player performing tasks, reviewing, and arranging events and meetings. In other
time periods the Urban Field team will be the primary player, leading public engagement, coordinating
with proposed development, and producing concepts for the public plaza and surrounding context. If
the project were to begin with the initial meeting during the week of January 6th, then the project
would be concluded by the end of November, 2020. Should the project extend for a duration of over a
year into 2021, then the Urban Field Studio I SWA team would need to revisit the fees for the project
with the City of Burlingame.
Summary of Project Tasks and Estimated Costs (not including optional tasks):
The hours are the total time that the UFS I SWA team members are estimated to spend to perform the
tasks and to produce deliverable products. The costs represent the total number of hours times the
billing rates of the assigned individuals of the team; the costs do not include time necessary for
scheduling, arranging and reviewing.
Task
Team Members
Hours
Costs
Task 1: Project Initiation
126
$26,120.00
Task 1.1 - Initial (Kick-off) meeting and site visit
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
42
$9,240.00
Task 1.2 - Review of existing documents and maps
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
32
$6,750.00
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 9. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Task 1.3 -Existing conditions and site analysis
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
52
$10,130.00
Task 2: Public and Stakeholder Participation
432
$85,230.00
Task 2.1 - Public Outreach Strategy
UFS, SWA, KMA
14
$2,870.00
Task 2.2 - Survey and website materials
UFS, SWA
20
$3,640.00
Task 2.3 - Meetings with Five Stakeholders
UFS, SWA
70
$14,550.00
Task 2.4 - Seven community meetings (4 public
community meetings and 3 community events)
UFS, SWA, KMA
288
$57,020.00
Task 2.5 - Summary of community input
UFS, SWA, KMA
40
$7,150.00
Task 3: Coordination with Developer Team
62
$13,450.00
Task 3.1 - Initial meeting with Development Team
UFS, SWA
20
4,360.00
Task 3.2 - Progress meetings with Development Team
(3 meetings)
UFS, SWA
42
$9,090.00
Task 4: Conceptual Design Alternatives for Public
Plaza
386
$84,660.00
Task 4.1- Develop up to five diagrammatic
alternatives
UFS, SWA
90
$19,550.00
Task 4.2 - Develop three conceptual alternatives
including economic analysis
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
128
$27,720.00
Task 4.3 - Preferred Alternative including
programming and economic analysis
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
128
$28,560.00
Task 4.4 - Draft memo and preferred plaza concept
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
40
$8,830.00
Task 5: Meetings
276
$56,930.00
Task 5.1 - 8 Meetings with City Staff (4 plus 3 with
Sub -Comm & 1 Initial meeting)
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
60
$12,590.00
Task 5.2 - Meetings with Council Subcommittee
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
70
$14,100.00
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 10. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
(3 meetings combined with City Staff)
Task 5.3 — Meetings with the Parks and Recreation
UFS, SWA, BKF
52
$10,650.00
Commission (2 Meetings)
Task 5.4 - Meetings with Planning Commission and
UFS, SWA, KMA, BKF
94
$19,590.00
City Council (5 meetings: 1 Joint & 4 separate)
Total Labor Cost
1282
$266,390.00
Reimbursable Expenses & Administrative Costs
Reimbursable Expenses at 8% of hourly total
$21,310.00
Consultant Administration at 10% of sub -consultants' charges
$11,100.00
Total Reimbursable Expenses & Administrative Costs
$32,410.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $298,800.00
Notes:
1. All amounts are rounded to the next $10.
2. Task 2: City to provide website, distribute survey, perform outreach, and to schedule & organize
meeting venues, food & beverage
3. Task 2.4: Costs for reproduction and materials for the three rounds of Plaza design used at Community
meetings are included in the 8% of labor costs for reimbursable expenses
4. Task 4: Includes concepts for development on portions of Parking Lots E and J
5. Task 5: Meetings include preparation time by Urban Field Studio I SWA team
6. Urban Field Studio is scheduled to attend all the meetings on the Tentative Schedule with the
City
7. Task 5: SWA is budgeted to attend four meetings with City staff and Council Sub -Committee,
and five meetings with the Planning Commission and City Council
8. Task 5.1 & 5.2: KMA and BKF are each budgeted to attend two meetings with a combined City
staff and Council Sub -Committee
9. Tasks 5.3 & 5.4: KMA is budgeted to attend one Community Meeting and one meeting with the
Planning Commission or City Council
10. Page & Turnbull are assumed not to be on the team, since the firm is working with the
development team on the adjacent Post Office site
11. Optional Tasks: Additional meetings are assumed to be in Burlingame
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 11. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
12. Schedule: A schedule of approximately forty-five (45) weeks is assumed, or approximately
eleven months, which includes some time for reviews, arrangements and scheduling. If the
schedule changes and extends to more than fifty-two (52) weeks, or more than a year, then the
projected fees could change as well.
Kevin, please feel free to call us after you have reviewed this revised proposal to discuss any questions
or any adjustments you would like to make to the scope, schedule, or budget.
Sincerely,
Heidi Sokolowsky, Founding Partner
Frank Fuller, FAIA, Partner
Urban Field Studio
Attachments: Urban Field Studio Rate Schedule to 12/31/2020
Proposed Tentative Schedule - 12/18/2019 - Draft
CC: Catherine Keylon, City of Burlingame
Jane Lin, Urban Field Studio
Marco Esposito, SWA
Kevin Feeney, KMA
Daniel Schaefer, BKF
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304 Page 12. DRAFT
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com December 30, 2019
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com Revised Proposal
Burlingame Public Plaza & Context Design - Proposed Tentative Schedule - 12/30/2019 DRAFT
Urban Field Studio/ SWA Team
Anticipated project start early January 2020
MONTH I
TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION &
EXISTING CONDITIONS
'
TASK2: PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER
Memo
I"
'
PARTICIPATION
Public;
I
Commuoity
Skakehol
er Public
'Public
;
Puplic
Mtg #1'
1
Events
Meetings
Mtg #2
Mtg #3
Mt #4
TASK 3: COORDINATION WITH POST
OFFICE DEVELOPER TEAM
Clarrette
p1
M7ng
Meeting #3
Meeting #4
TASK 4: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
First:ldeas
Alterrtatives
,Draft Preferred
Preferred glternati
iel
Final
Alternative ;
; Draft Report
Report
Fist Ideas ,
Alternatives ,
,
Input on Alternatives i
Draft; Preferredi ,
AltRrnative , , Input
Final Preferred
, Alternative
,
TASK 5: MEETINGS
0J
IQ
a
Initial Mtg/
Mtq W/
Mtg W/
Mtq W/
Mtg W/
Mtg W/'
mtg W/
Mtg W/
Site Visit #1
City Staff #2
City staff #3;
City Staff #4
City S aff #5
; City
City Staff #7
City Staff #8
staff #6 :
Subcommittee
'Subcommittee
'Subcor}tmittee
Meting #
Mtg #1
Mtg #2
,
' Parks PC
CC ' ;
; P
rks
P�
CC'
PC/CC'
& R' c Mt
Mt '
&
ec
Mtg
Mtg
Mtg #1
Mtg,#1 #2
#3
Mt
#2
#4
#5'
Notice
of
;
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Preparation
(not in scope)
URBAN FIELD
RATE SCHEDULE
(Rates effective through 12/31/2020)
Charges for Services:
Charges for basic and additional services shall be based on the following rates and are
subject to revision annually:
Principal -In -Charge:
Consulting Principal/Project Manager:
Senior Designer:
Designer:
Graphic Designer/ GIS:
Project Administrator:
Consultant's Time:
Automobile Travel:
Reimbursable Expenses/
Reproduction Costs:
All other costs:
$235.00 per hour
$185.00 per hour
$150.00 per hour
$125.00 per hour
$105.00 per hour
$ 75.00 per hour
1.10 times consultant's charges
Prevailing IRS allowance
1.10 times charge
Direct reimbursement
Reimbursable Expenses:
Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the compensation for basic and additional services
and include actual expenditures made by Urban Field Studio or its professional consultants
in the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following subparagraphs:
1. Expense of transportation, including rental car insurance (loss damage waiver/
collision damage waiver and liability coverage), and living when traveling in
connection with the Project; conference call services, and fees paid for securing
approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project.
2. Expense of reproductions including computer plotting, postage, overnight priority
mail and handling of Drawings and Specifications.
3. If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher
than regular rates and expense of renderings or models for the Owner's use.
URBAN FIELD STUDIO 415.754.9304
2169 Folsom Street, M 304 info@urbanfieldstudio.com
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.urbanfieldstudio.com
BURL AGENDA NO: 8d
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Ana Maria Silva, Executive Assistant — (650) 558-7204
Subject: Open Nomination Period to Fill Two Vacancies on the Measure I Citizens'
Oversight Committee
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council call for applications to fill two vacancies on the Measure I
Citizens' Oversight Committee. The pending vacancies are due to the expiring terms of Committee
members Stephanie Lee and Sandeep Shroff. The recommended deadline is Friday, February 7,
2020.
BACKGROUND
The City's current commissioner (and committee member) appointment procedure calls for any
Commissioner desiring reappointment to apply in the same manner as all other candidates. All past
applicants on the two-year waitlist will be informed of the vacancy.
1
BURLINGAME AGENDA NO: 8e
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Ana Maria Silva, Executive Assistant — (650) 558-7204
Subject: Open Nomination Period to Fill One Vacancy on the Planning Commission
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council call for applications to fill one vacancy on the Planning
Commission. The pending vacancy is due to the vacated seat of Commissioner Brenden Kelly.
The recommended deadline is Friday, January 31, 2020. This will allow applicants two
opportunities to attend a Planning Commission meeting (January 13 and January 27, 2020).
BACKGROUND
All past applicants on the two-year waitlist will be informed of the vacancy.
1
BURL AGENDA NO: 8f
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Bradley McCulley, City Librarian — (650) 558-7404
Subject: Approval of Library Staff Out of State Travel
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the out-of-state travel request of Librarian Elaine Tai.
BACKGROUND
The Public Library Association's (PLA) annual conference will be held in Nashville, TN. Adult
Services Librarian Elaine Tai is a full-time employee with PLA membership and has requested to
attend this conference for professional development. As part of the Library's Strategic Plan,
employees are encouraged to take advantage of the opportunities these conferences provide for
staff professional growth and overall job satisfaction.
DISCUSSION
The early bird registration fee for the conference is $305, the room rate will be $239/night for four
nights, and air travel will be approximately $383.
FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Library's travel, conference, and meetings account for
attendance at this conference.
1
ez R W E h
BURLINGAME AGENDA NO: 9a
STAFF REPORT A
MEETING DATE: January6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230
Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7263
Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer — (650) 558-7237
Subject: Public Hearing to Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.36.030,
13.36.040, and 13.40.010 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to Consider
Extending the Parking Time Limit from One Hour to Two Hours, and Increase
the Parking Meter Rate on Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council hold a Public Hearing to introduce the attached ordinance
amending Chapters 13.36.030, 13.36.040, and 13.40.010 of the Burlingame Municipal Code (BMC)
to consider changing the parking time limit from one hour to two hours on Broadway from El Camino
Real to California Drive, and increase the parking meter rate from $0.50/hour to $1.00/hour.
In order to do so, staff recommends the following actions:
1. Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the attached ordinance;
2. By motion, waiving further reading and introducing the proposed ordinance;
3. Conducting a public hearing on the proposed ordinance;
4. Discussing the proposed ordinance and determining whether to bring it back for a second
reading and adoption; and
5. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before the
proposed adoption.
BACKGROUND
The City of Burlingame has two main commercial districts, Burlingame Avenue Downtown and
Broadway. Parking in both areas consists of on -street parking and public parking lots, with either
individual parking meters or pay kiosks. Durations and rates for each of these parking facilities vary.
In September 2018, the TSPC reviewed a request from the Broadway Business Improvement
District (BID) to increase the parking duration along Broadway between El Camino Real to
California Drive from one hour to two hours. Their proposal was based on input from their
customers, who commented that the one -hour meters did not provide sufficient time to patronize
the businesses on Broadway. The Broadway BID circulated and submitted a support petition from
local businesses. Staff also received numerous emails from business owners, some of whom
1
Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.36.030, 13.36.040, and 13.40.010 of the BMC January 6, 2020
supported the proposal, and some of whom opposed it. The TSPC recommended that the City
Council create a six-month pilot program in which meters on the 1100 and 1400 blocks of Broadway
would be converted to two-hour meters, while those on the other blocks would remain one -hour
meters. The pilot program would be accompanied studies to determine the efficacy of the proposal
before taking next steps.
At the October 15, 2018 City Council meeting, the Council discussed the matter and expressed
concerns regarding the potential reduction in turnover of parking spaces as a result of making them
two-hour spaces, which may be more problematic in meeting the parking demand, and
recommended exploring other options. The Council recommended increasing the wayfinding
parking signage and other improvements to assist individuals in finding the two-hour parking lots.
Additionally, the Council determined that the City should revisit the matter after the signage
improvements were complete. Subsequently, staff implemented wayfinding signage to increase
awareness of the two-hour parking on the side streets.
On November 13, 2019, the Economic Development Subcommittee held its annual meeting with
Broadway BID representatives. The BID members present advocated for changing the meters on
Broadway to two hours and noted that their businesses were suffering with the current one -hour
meters. The Subcommittee and staff asked the BID representatives to discuss the matter with their
Board and send a formal request to the City, asking for the change to the meters. That request,
which is attached, supported:
• Changing all current one -hour parking spaces on Broadway to two-hour spaces
• Maintaining all 24-minute meters in place and adding an additional meter on the 1400 block
of Broadway
• Changing the parking meters rates from $0.50 per hour to $1.00 per hour
DISCUSSION
Staff reviewed the BID's proposal, and after analysis believed that the parking time limit can be
increased from one hour to two hours, which would be consistent with Burlingame Avenue. In
addition, increasing the parking meter rate from $0.50 per hour to $1.00 per hour would address
the issue of turn -over of parking spaces.
The Broadway BID's proposal was presented to the TSPC at their December 12, 2019 meeting.
After an extensive discussion, the TSPC did not agree with the proposal as presented, and voted
against it 0-3-0. Though the TSPC voted down the proposal, they indicated support for a more
comprehensive plan and studies to be done prior to implementing the two-hour time limit change.
At the conclusion, the TSPC recommended the following items be analyzed as part of a
comprehensive approach to address parking on Broadway:
• Review existing loading zones and red -curbing areas to determine if additional spaces could
be freed up.
• Add more 24-minute spaces for service -related businesses.
• Provide an update on the electronic wayfinding signage project by Streetline.
• Shift or extend the parking enforcement time beyond 6:00 p.m.
Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.36.030, 13.36.040, and 13.40.010 of the BMC January 6, 2020
Staff reviewed the TSPC's recommendations and found that there is only one location where an
additional parking space can be gained from reducing the loading zones or red -curbing lengths.
Staff will implement this recommendation. Per input from the Broadway BID, adding parking tees
to the loading zones would better identify the spaces within the loading zones and allow for more
efficient parking. Adding more 24-minute spaces can be done in coordination with both the
Broadway BID and the affected business owners on a case -by -case basis. With regards to the
Streetline electronic wayfinding signage project, the vendor will start the project at the beginning of
the year. Lastly, with regards to extending the parking enforcement time beyond 6:00 p.m., staff
believes this will create a staffing/scheduling issue for the parking enforcement division, and will
also create an inequality between the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway commercial areas.
Currently, parking enforcement ends at 6:00 p.m., and public parking is free after this time in both
commercial districts.
Additionally, while reviewing the Burlingame Municipal Code, staff discovered that Burlingame
Avenue from El Camino Real to California Drive is still listed as having a one -hour parking
restriction. The parking restriction was changed to two hours during the Burlingame Avenue
Streetscape Project. Chapter 13.40.010 Parking Meter Zones was previously updated, but not
Chapters 13.36.030 (One -Hour Parking) or 13.36.040 (Two -Hour Parking). Staff recommends
updating the code to reflect the current parking time limit.
FISCAL IMPACT
The costs associated with preparing and installing signage for these meter changes are minimal
and will be absorbed within the Public Works Department operating budget.
Exhibit:
• Ordinance
BMC Update
• Broadway BID Letter
3
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTERS
13.36.030, 13.36.040, AND 13.40.010 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO
EXTEND THE PARKING TIME LIMIT FROM ONE HOUR TO TWO HOURS AND
INCREASE THE PARKING METER RATE ON BROADWAY FROM EL CAMINO
REAL TO CALIFORNIA DRIVE
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME ordains as follows:
Section 1. Factual Background and Findings.
WHEREAS, at its November 21, 2019 meeting, the Broadway Business
Improvement District (BID) unanimously supported increasing the parking time limit from
one hour to two hours on Broadway, adding an additional 24-minute meter at the 1400
block, and increasing meter rates from $0.50 per hour to $1.00 per hour; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed and supports the above proposal; and
WHEREAS, at its December 12, 2019 TSPC meeting, the Traffic, Safety, and
Parking Commission (TSPC) did not support the proposal, and instead sought a more
comprehensive approach to address parking along Broadway; and
WHEREAS, while the TSPC did not support the proposal as presented, they
indicated support for a more comprehensive plan and studies to be done prior to
implementing the two-hour time limit change; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the recommendations made by the TSPC and will
implement them separately; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends revising Chapters 13.40.010 Parking Meter Zones,
Chapters 13.36.030 (One -Hour Parking), and 13.36.040 (Two -Hour Parking) of the
Burlingame Municipal Code to increase the parking duration and parking meter rates along
Broadway; and
WHEREAS, while reviewing the Burlingame Municipal Code, staff discovered that
the parking restriction along Burlingame Avenue from El Camino Real to California Drive
was shown as one hour, and staff recommends that the City Council update the Code to
include this section of Burlingame Avenue as a two-hour restriction, consistent with the
plans developed as part of the Burlingame Avenue improvement project.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME,
HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
DIVISION 1:
Section 2. The City Council amends Chapter 13.36.030 One Hour Parking of the
Burlingame Municipal Code to remove the following:
"(a) Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive"
"(b) Burlingame Avenue from California Drive to El Camino Real"
Section 3. The City Council amends Chapter 13.36.040 Two Hour Parking of the
Burlingame Municipal Code with the following edits:
Add "Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive"
Revise "Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side
from Occidental to El Camino Real" to also include El Camino Real to
California Drive
Section 4. The City Council amends Chapter 13.40.010 Parking Meter Zones of the
Burlingame Municipal Code to remove the following:
"(2) 1 Hour Parking Limit
On the following street: Broadway: 50 cents for one hour'
"All other areas: 5 cents for each 30 minutes"
Section 5. The City Council amends Chapter 13.40.010 Parking Meter Zones of the
Burlingame Municipal Code to add the following under (3) 2-Hour Parking
Limit, $2.00 for two hours:
"Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive"
DIVISION 2:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this Ordinance. The Council declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
DIVISION 3:
This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance
with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of
Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.
Emily Beach, Mayor
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 6t" day of January, 2020, and adopted thereafter on the _ day of
, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers:
NOES:
Councilmembers:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
13.36.030 One -hour parking.
Except where prohibited or otherwise designated for shorter term time periods, it is
unlawful for any person to park a vehicle for a period longer than one hour between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on any day, excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part of the
following streets or portions of streets:
! . . . .
�4/�a..a..i.-t•fii.�����1 i...�rM.Maii2R.f...aJ.. r.s
(c) California Drive, west side, from Douglas to Bellevue Avenue and from Carmelita
Avenue to Broadway;
(d) Ingold Road, north side, forty-eight (48) feet west from the curb return of Rollins Road
to one hundred twenty-eight (128) feet west from that same curb return;
(e) Magnolia Avenue, east side, from the intersection of Magnolia Avenue to three hundred
(300) feet north of the center line of Trousdale Drive;
(f) Primrose Road, from Bellevue Avenue to Floribunda Avenue.
13.36.040 Two-hour parking.
It is unlawful for the driver of any vehicle to park such vehicle, unless elsewhere in this
title otherwise provided, for a longer period than two (2) hours between the hours designated any
day, excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part of the following streets, or portions of
streets:
(a) 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.:
(1) Adrian Road, west side, one hundred fifty-five (155) feet southerly from the
southeast end of the curb return of David Road;
(2) Anita Road, west side, from Peninsula Avenue one hundred forty-five (145) feet
north toward Bayswater Avenue;
(3) Bayswater Avenue from El Camino Real to Park Road; south side, from
California Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
(4) Bellevue Avenue, except the south side from Primrose Road to Almer Road;
(5) Broadway, from El Camino Real to California Drive
(6) Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side from
Occidental to El Camino Real; El Camino Real to California Drive
(7) California Drive, west side, from Carmelita Avenue to Palm Drive; from
Burlingame Avenue to Peninsula Avenue; from Oak Grove Avenue four hundred
(400) feet northwards to 755 California Drive, except areas designated for thirty
(30) minute parking;
(7) Capuchino Avenue from four hundred (400) feet southerly of the centerline of
Broadway to Lincoln Avenue;
(8) Carmelita Avenue, south side, from El Camino Real to Chula Vista Avenue;
(9) Carolan Avenue, east side, from one hundred (100) feet northerly of Toyon Drive
to four hundred sixty (460) feet northerly of Toyon Drive; and east side, from
Cadillac Way to Broadway;
(10) Chapin Avenue, from Chapin Lane to El Camino Real;
(11) Chula Vista Avenue from the centerline of Broadway to four hundred ten feet
(410) southerly of the centerline of Broadway;
(12) Douglas Avenue;
(13) East Lane, east side, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue;
(14) El Camino Real service road between Dufferin Avenue and Murchison Drive;
(15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from
California Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
(16) Laguna Avenue from two hundred eighty feet (280) southerly to five hundred ten
(510) feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
(17) Lorton Avenue, west side, from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue; east side,
from Howard Avenue one hundred twenty (120) feet south toward Bayswater and
forty (40) feet north toward Burlingame Avenue;
(18) Magnolia, west side, from Trousdale Drive to Plaza Lane;
(19) North Carolan Avenue with three (3) parking spaces along the lot front of 1361
North Carolan Avenue;
(20) Occidental Avenue, from El Camino Real to Ralston Avenue;
(21) Paloma Avenue from three hundred ten (310) feet southerly of the centerline of
Broadway to Lincoln Avenue;
(22) Park Road, except the west side, from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
(23) Primrose Road, west side, from Howard Avenue to El Camino Real;
(24) Ralston Avenue, from Occidental Avenue to El Camino Real;
(25) Rollins Road from ninety (90) feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty
(460) feet northerly of Toyon Drive;
(26) South Lane, both sides;
(27) Trousdale Drive, north side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive and
California Drive to ninety (90) feet west of said curb return;
(28) Trousdale Drive, south side, from the curb return of Marco Polo Way to forty (40)
feet east of said curb return;
(29) Marco Polo Way, east side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive to forty (40)
feet south of said curb return;
(30) Crescent Avenue, both sides, from the curb return of Ralston Avenue to the curb
return of Howard Avenue;
(31) 1600 block of Howard Avenue, both sides, from the curb return of Crescent
Avenue to the curb return of Occidental Avenue;
(32) Newlands Avenue, both sides;
(33) Cypress Avenue, both sides, from El Camino Real to twenty (20) feet southerly of
the centerline of Central Avenue (between the addresses of 1500 and 5141);
(34) Carol Avenue, both sides, from El Camino Real to Barroilhet Avenue; and
(35) East Carol Avenue, both sides, from Carol Avenue to Barroilhet Avenue.
(b) 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.:
(1) Carmelita Avenue, north side, between Chula Vista Avenue and El Camino Real;
(2) Magnolia Avenue, east side, from three hundred (300) feet north of the center line
of Trousdale Drive to Murchison Drive.
(c) 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.:
(1) Carolan Avenue, from Oak Grove Avenue to North Lane
13.40.010 Parking meter zones.
(a) The streets hereinafter described are defined and established as parking meter
zones. The parking of vehicles along such portions of these streets, and at such
times as may be designated by the city council, shall be controlled, regulated, and
inspected with the aid of parking meters:
(1) Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive;
(2) Burlingame Avenue from El Camino Real to California Drive;
(3) California Drive, west side, from Broadway to Carmelita Avenue and Bellevue
Avenue to Howard Avenue; and east side from North Lane to two hundred
seventy (270) feet south of Howard Avenue;
(4) Capuchino Avenue from one hundred forty (140) feet north of the centerline of
Broadway to two hundred thirty-three (233) feet south of the centerline of
Broadway;
(5) Carolan Avenue from South Lane to North Lane;
(6) Chapin Avenue, from Primrose Road to El Camino Real;
(7) Chula Vista Avenue from Broadway to two hundred eighty-two (282) feet south
of the centerline of Broadway;
(8) City Hall Lane from Primrose Road to Park Road;
(9) Donnelly Avenue from Primrose Road to Lorton Avenue;
(10) East Lane from Burlingame Avenue to North Lane;
(11) Highland Avenue from Howard Avenue to California Drive and one parking
space on the southwest corner of Highland at Howard;
(12) Howard Avenue from El Camino Real to Highland Avenue;
(13) Laguna Avenue from Broadway to one hundred thirty-six (136) feet south of the
centerline of Broadway;
(14) Lorton Avenue from Bellevue Avenue to Howard Avenue, and the east side of
Lorton Avenue from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
(15) North Lane from Carolan Avenue to East Lane;
(16) Paloma Avenue from one hundred (100) feet north of the centerline of Broadway
to one hundred twenty (120) feet south of the centerline of Broadway;
(17) Park Road, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue, and the west side of
Park Road from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
(18) Primrose Road from Bellevue Avenue to Howard Avenue; and the east side of
Primrose Road from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue; and the west side of
Primrose Road from Howard Avenue to two hundred (200) feet south of the
centerline of Howard Avenue;
(19) South Lane from Carolan Avenue/East Lane to California Drive; and
(20) West Lane from South Lane to two hundred (200) feet south of South Lane.
(b) The following parking meter rates are established in the city:
(1) 24-Minute Parking Limit
On the following streets:
Broadway from El Camino Real to Rollins Road;
Capuchin Avenue from Broadway to Carmelita Avenue; and
Chula Vista Avenue from Broadway to Carmelita Avenue:
20 cents for 24 minutes
On the following streets: -
California Drive from Bellevue Avenue to Howard Avenue;
Chapin Avenue from Primrose Road to El Camino Real;
Highland Avenue from California Drive to Howard Avenue;
Howard Avenue from El Camino Real to Highland Drive;
Lorton Avenue from Bellevue Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
Park Road from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue; and
Primrose Road from Bellevue Avenue to Bayswater Avenue:
All other areas:
40 cents for 24 minutes
5 cents for each 12 minutes
(3) 2-Hour Parking Limit
On the following street:
Burlingame Avenue from El Camino Real to California Drive:
$1.00 the first hour; $2.00 the second hour
On the following streets:
Broadway from El Camino Real to California Drive;
California Drive from Bellevue Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
Chapin Avenue from Primrose Road to El Camino Real;
Donnelly Avenue from Primrose Road to Lorton Avenue;
Highland Avenue from California Drive to Bayswater Avenue;
Howard Avenue from Primrose Road to Highland Avenue;
Lorton Avenue from Bellevue Avenue to Howard Avenue;
Park Road from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue;
Primrose Road from Bellevue Avenue to Howard Avenue:
$2.00 for two hours
On the following streets:
Capuchino Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Carmelita Avenue;
Chula Vista Avenue from Broadway to Carmelita Avenue;
Laguna Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Carmelita Avenue; and
Paloma Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Carmelita Avenue:
$1.00 for two hours
All other areas:
75 cents for each hour
(4) 4-Hour Parking Limit
On the following street:
Howard Avenue from Primrose Road to Highland Avenue:
$1.00 for each hour
(5) 10-Hour Parking Limit
On the following streets:
California Drive from Howard Avenue to Bellevue Avenue;
Chapin Avenue from Primrose Road to El Camino Real;
City Hall Lane from Primrose Road to Park Road;
Donnelly Avenue from Primrose Road to Lorton Avenue;
Highland Avenue from Howard Avenue to California Drive; and
Howard Avenue from El Camino Real to California Drive:
$3.00 for 10 hours
On the following streets:
Lorton Avenue from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue;
Park Road from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue;
Primrose Road from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue;
South Lane from Carolan Avenue/East Lane to California Drive; and
West Lane from South Lane to two hundred (200) feet south of South Lane:
All other areas:
$3.00 for 10 hours
25 cents for each 2-1/2 hours
November 21, 2019
oj
RROAD%AY
V(LLACI
SHOas
Lisa Goldman, Burlingame City Manager
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
, Burlingame parking request
J of directors met today at 8:30 am . In attendance was President John Kevranian, director
Treasure Chris Diez, Secreatary Ross Bruce, Director Linda Bullis, Mechant Frank Wang of
iurant, Merchant Orhan Kurt of Rocca, Merchant Irene Preston of Prestons, City Economic
Joseph Sanfilipo, and Merchant Isabelle dePaz of all that Glitters. The Board
approved a parking recommendation for the City's consideration. The Broadway
areby request the city to:
;hange all current 1 hour parking spaces on Broadway to 2 hour spaces.
:eep all current 24 minute zones in place and add one additional 24 minute zone where
peter 1401 is located at the North West end of the 1100 Block of Broadway.
hange the cost of all new 2 hour meters from 50 cents/hour to $1.00/hour.
hn Kevranian, BID President
Gera d Weisl, BID Director
'adway Business Improvement District 0 1399 Broadway, Burlingame, California 94010
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO: 9b
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230
Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7263
Andrew Wong, Senior Civil Engineer — (650) 558-7237
Subject: Public Hearing to Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.24.010 and
13.24.015 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to Reduce the Posted Speed
Limit on California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and Peninsula Avenue
to 25 MPH
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council hold a Public Hearing to introduce the attached ordinance
amending Chapters 13.24.010 and 13.24.015 of the Burlingame Municipal Code to reduce the
posted speed limit on California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and Peninsula Avenue to 25
MPH.
In order to do so, staff recommends the following actions:
1. Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the attached ordinance;
2. By motion, waiving further reading and introducing the proposed ordinance;
3. Conducting a public hearing on the proposed ordinance;
4. Discussing the proposed ordinance and determining whether to bring it back for a second
reading and adoption; and
5. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before the
proposed adoption.
BACKGROUND
The California Drive Roundabout Project was completed this past spring. The project has
significantly improved pedestrian access and safety along California Drive near the intersections of
Bellevue Avenue and Lorton Avenue, while reducing potential conflicts for all modes of
transportation. Staff continues to monitor the intersection and make small changes to further
enhance the safety, including enhancing the pedestrian Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFB), installing driver feedback signs, deploying changeable message signs, and implementing
a pilot program with a 25 MPH speed limit on the California Drive approaches to the roundabout.
The roundabout was designed with a 15 MPH advisory speed limit. This advisory speed limit was
in place to prepare vehicles approaching the roundabout to yield to pedestrians near the crosswalks
1
Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.24.010 and 13.24.015 of the BMC January 6, 2020
and vehicles already in the roundabout. Staff observed that not all vehicles were entering the
roundabout at the posted advisory 15 MPH speed limit, which contributed to some vehicles already
in the roundabout stopping to avoid a potential collision.
Per the City's Municipal Code (BMC), the portion of California Drive from Oak Grove Avenue to
Burlingame Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH, while the posted speed limit from
Burlingame Avenue to Peninsula Avenue is 30 MPH. Part of the reason for some vehicles not
complying with the 15 MPH advisory speed can be attributed to the rapid deceleration from 35 MPH
to 15 MPH in a relatively short distance. Although the City deployed changeable message signs to
warn drivers to reduce their speed, the 25 MPH signs were installed on a pilot basis to improve the
deceleration transition.
DISCUSSION
The requirements for posting speed limits are found in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Division
11, "Rules of the Road." For this specific situation, the requirements can be found in CVC Section
22352, for the 25 MPH limit, where the conditions necessary to qualify for these 'default' speed
limits are described. The 25 MPH speed limit applies to streets located within 1) business districts,
2) residential districts, 3) near schools, or 4) near senior centers. The 25 MPH speed limits are
commonly signed in residential districts for the benefit of the residents, and occasionally in
downtown business areas.
California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and Bellevue Avenue -Lorton Avenue meets one of
the four conditions for the prima facie 25 MPH speed limit, the 'business district' condition. The
definition of business district is provided in CVC Division 1, Words and Phrases Defined, Sections
235 and 240, as follows:
235. A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous
thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or
more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for
business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300
feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A
business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above
ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the
following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions in Sections 235 and
515: (a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the
front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway. (b) Where a highway is physically
divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately
shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a
district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, and public
buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. (d) A highway
or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the
number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the
highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
Ordinance Amending Chapters 13.24.010 and 13.24.015 of the BMC January 6, 2020
Being within the business district, California Drive from Oak Grove Avenue to Peninsula Avenue
meets one of the criteria for a 25 MPH default speed limit, so it qualifies to post and radar enforce
this speed accordingly. However, California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and Peninsula
Avenue appears as a minor arterial on the California Road System (CRS) map, so under the
statutes of CVC Section 40802, it would constitute a speed trap if this 25 MPH speed limit were to
be enforced with radar equipment. However, as permitted by the CVC, the City can enforce the 25
MPH speed limit on this segment by using alternative approved methods.
Staff
presented
this proposal to
the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission at their
November 14,
2019
meeting.
After reviewing
the matter the TPSC supported reducing the posted
speed limit to
25 MPH with a vote of 4-1-0.
FISCAL IMPACT
The costs associated with changing the posted speed limit signs are minimal and will be absorbed
within the Public Works Department operating budget.
Exhibits:
• Ordinance
BMC Update
3
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING CHAPTERS 13.24.010 AND 13.24.015 OF THE BURLINGAME
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT ON CALIFORNIA
DRIVE BETWEEN OAK GROVE AVENUE AND PENINSULA AVENUE
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME ordains as follows:
Section 1. Factual Background and Findings.
WHEREAS, the California Drive Roundabout Project was designed with a 15 MPH
advisory speed limit. This advisory speed limit was in place to prepare vehicles
approaching the roundabout to yield to pedestrians near the crosswalks and vehicles
already in the roundabout; and
WHEREAS, City staff observed that not all vehicles were entering the roundabout
at the posted advisory 15 MPH speed limit, which contributed to some vehicles already in
the roundabout stopping to avoid a potential collision; and
WHEREAS, per the City's Municipal Code, the portion of California Drive from Oak
Grove Avenue to Burlingame Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH, while the
posted speed limit from Burlingame Avenue to Peninsula Avenue is 30 MPH; and
WHEREAS, part of the reason for some vehicles not complying with the 15 MPH
advisory speed can be attributed to the rapid deceleration from 35 MPH to 15 MPH in a
relatively short distance; and
WHEREAS, being within a business district, California Drive from Oak Grove
Avenue to Peninsula Avenue meets one of the criteria for a 25 MPH default speed limit as
identified in the California Vehicle Code.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
HEREBY ORDAINS TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON CALIFORNIA DRIVE FROM
OAK GROVE AVENUE TO PENINSULA AVENUE TO 25 MPH BY TAKING THE
FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
DIVISION 1:
Section 2. The City Council hereby amends Section 4 of Chapter 13.24.010 thirty
five miles per hour of the Burlingame Municipal Code to read as follows:
"(4) California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and Murchison Drive"
Section 3. The City Council hereby amends Section 1 of Chapter 13.24.015 thirty
miles per hour of the Burlingame Municipal Code to remove the following:
"(1) California Drive between Peninsula Avenue and Burlingame
Avenue"
DIVISION 2:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this Ordinance. The Council declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
DIVISION 3:
This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance
with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of
Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.
Emily Beach, Mayor
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 6'" day of Janua , 2020, by the following vote, and adopted thereafter
at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2020, by
the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers:
NOES:
Councilmembers:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
13.24.010 Thirty-five miles per hour.
(a) No person shall drive a vehicle upon any of the following designated streets at a
speed greater than thirty-five (35) miles per hour; it is determined that the speed
limitation hereby established is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly
movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe:
(1) Airport Boulevard between Old Bayshore Highway and Lang Road;
(2) Adrian Road between Millbrae city limits and David Road;
(3) Old Bayshore Highway;
(4) California Drive between Oak Grove Avenue and
Murchison Drive;
(5) Carolan Avenue between Broadway and Oak Grove Avenue;
(6) Peninsula Avenue between California Drive and Humboldt Road;
(7) Rollins Road between southern city limits to northern city limits;
(8) Skyline Boulevard from six hundred (600) feet north of Rivera Drive south to the
city limits; and
13.24.015 Thirty miles per hour.
(a) No person shall drive a vehicle upon any of the following designated streets at a
speed greater than thirty (30) miles per hour; it is determined that the speed
limitation hereby established is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly
movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe:
(2) Peninsula Avenue between El Camino Real and California Drive; and
(3) Hillside Drive between Alvarado Avenue and El Camino Real.
AGENDA NO: 10a
STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME
2ME IF MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204
Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230
Rob Mallick, Deputy Dir. of Public Works, Operations — (650) 558-7670
Subject: Consideration of an Enhanced Program to Address Illegal Dumping
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report on illegal dumping in the city and consider
whether to authorize enhanced funding to address the issue either at the mid -year budget or in the
next fiscal year.
BACKGROUND
Illegal dumping occurs throughout the Peninsula. In Burlingame, the dumping pattern that is most
noticeable to residents occurs when tenants move out of multi -family units and leave large items
such as furniture and televisions at the curbside. It appears as though people from out of town
may also dump their items in certain hot spots, and individual businesses have been cited for
patterns of illegal dumping as well.
The City is a member of the South Bayside Waste Management Authority (SBWMA), which has a
franchise agreement with Recology San Mateo County. Under the agreement, there are two
avenues available to assist residents with proper disposal of potential trash:
• 5.05 Residential On -Call Bulky Item Collection Service (Curbside)
• 5.09 Abandoned Waste Cleanup Collection Service
Although the 'Abandoned Waste Cleanup Collection Service' provides a maximum of 30
abandoned pick-ups per service day, this number encompasses all 12 public agencies in the
SBWMA service area. There is no existing program at Recology for the allocation of these pick-
ups. SBWMA staff has been working on a recommended franchise agreement amendment that
will enhance this service in the future; that recommendation is to be considered by the SBWMA
Board in the spring. But currently, abandoned pick-ups are assigned on an as -available basis, with
certain larger jurisdictions securing the majority of the available services.
Reports of illegal dumping are frequent: the Public Works Department, on average, has 21 unique
abandoned pickups per month, accumulating over 100 cubic yards of debris. During the past two
quarters, the department has spent more than 140 hours collecting items that were illegally dumped
1
Illegal Dumping Informational Report January 6, 2020
in the City right-of-way. These hours do not account for the hours related to Code Enforcement
responding to the locations to gatrer photos, write letters to the property owners, and proceed with
follow up until the trash/debris is removed. The Public Works Department does not have staff
dedicated to full-time trash removal. When these calls come in, crews are diverted from their
primary duties in order to respond.
DISCUSSION
Dumping trash in unauthorized locations is not only a health issue, it is also unsightly and negatively
impacts the natural environment. Therefore, the City Attorney's Office and the Public Works
Department have put together a preliminary plan to address the issues related to illegal dumping.
The plan includes additional public outreach, a contract with a trash hauler for on -call trash removal
when Recology is not available, leasing security cameras for hot spots, placing additional
information on illegal dumping on the City's website, and developing a Report It Reward program.
The preliminary plan will require funding, which has not yet been appropriated, and additional time
for planning and execution. Staff asks the Council to review, prioritize, and approve the funding
based on the order of priority.
A. Public outreach
• Water bill insert regarding large item trash pickup services from Recology: $1,200
• Direct mail to all postal customers in Burlingame: $4,500
• Additional outreach via the City's eNews and social media accounts (NextDoor,
Facebook, Twitter, etc.): staff time required; costs can be absorbed in existing budgets
B. Annual service contract
• Contract with a trash hauler for on -call trash removal when Recology is unavailable:
estimated cost of $25,000450,000 annually.
C. Leasing of four security cameras to monitor dumping "hot spots"
• Price includes all equipment to operate for 12 months and signage for the security
cameras: $76,000.
• Identified hot spots based on call history: Rollins/Larkspur, 399 Rollins, Ansel/Almer,
and El Camino Real (portable unit)
D. Enhanced information on illegal dumping on the City's website
• Staff time required; costs can be absorbed in existing budgets
E. Report It! Reward! Program
• SeeClickFix already serves as a portal for reporting illegal dumping, and the City
generally gets calls immediately after large -item trash is dumped on El Camino Real
and Rollins Road. However, the Council may wish to direct staff to develop a more
robust reporting/incentive program.
• Costs for that program cannot be estimated at this time, but if Council so directs, staff
can report back with a proposal and associated costs.
V
Illegal Dumping Informational Report
January 6, 2020
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for an illegal dumping program will need to be appropriated either during the mid -year
budget review in March or as part of the FY 2020/21 budget. Budget impacts for the suggested
changes range from staff time only to a total of approximately $130,000 in additional costs per year.
3
BUR- uNGgME AGENDA NO: 10b
STAFF REPORT
a
MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Sonya M. Morrison, Human Resources Director— (650) 558-7209
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Amendment of the City Manager's
Employment Agreement to Provide a Salary Increase of 3%, and Approving
the City of Burlingame Pay Rates and Ranges (Salary Schedule)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to
execute an amendment to City Manager Lisa Goldman's employment agreement to increase her
salary by 3% effective the first pay period of January 2020, and authorizing the City of Burlingame
pay rates and ranges for employees (salary schedule).
BACKGROUND
City Manager Lisa Goldman began her service with the City of Burlingame on December 27,
2012. On December 4, 2019, the City Council met with Ms. Goldman in closed session to review
her performance after her seventh year in office. Per Paragraph 7, Employment Benefits, of the
Employment Agreement, Ms. Goldman receives the same benefits provided to City Department
Heads.
DISCUSSION
Following their evaluation of her performance, Ms. Goldman left the closed session, and the
Council thereafter discussed her compensation. In recognition of Ms. Goldman's positive
performance evaluation, the City Council discussed at the December 4 closed session a proposal
to increase the City Manager's salary by 3%. This is the same increase provided to the City
Department Heads and Unrepresented unit.
In order to increase her salary, Section 5 of the employment agreement must be amended to
increase the monthly salary from $20,721.55 per month to $21,343.20 per month effective the
first pay period of January, 2020.
The proposed increase for the City Manager requires the City Council to authorize a new salary
schedule that, once approved, will be made available to the public via the City of Burlingame
website.
1
Amendment to the City Manager's Employment Agreement and Salary Schedule Update January 6, 2020
FISCAL IMPACT
The financial impact of this increase is approximately $9,000 per year. The City Manager's Office
budget can absorb the increase using existing funds for the remainder of the current fiscal year.
Exhibits:
• Resolution
• Sixth Amendment to City Manager's Employment Agreement
• Salary Schedule
2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE CITY MANAGER'S EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE A COST OF LIVING SALARY INCREASE OF 3%, AND
REVISION TO THE CITY OF BURLINGAME SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, City Manager Lisa K. Goldman began her service with the City on
December 27, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted performance evaluations for Ms.
Goldman upon completion of each year with the City, all of which have been positive;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined, following its evaluation on December 4,
2019, that a salary increase of 3% was warranted in recognition of Ms. Goldman's
successful performance, effective at the beginning of the first pay period of January
2020; and
WHEREAS, this is the same salary increase provided to the City Department
Head and Unrepresented unit; and
WHEREAS, all other terms and conditions of Ms. Goldman's employment are to
remain as provided in her original employment agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame Salary Schedule has been revised in
accordance with these actions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Burlingame authorizes the Mayor to execute the attached Sixth Amendment to Ms.
Goldman's City Manager Employment Agreement, to increase Ms. Goldman's gross
salary by 3%, effective the first pay period of January 2020, and leaving all other terms
and conditions of employment as provided in the City Manager Employment Agreement,
and authorizes and adopts the revised City of Burlingame Salary Schedule.
Emily Beach, Mayor
I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
6th day of January, 2020, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers:
NOES:
Councilmembers:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AND LISA K. GOLDMAN FOR EMPLOYMENT AS CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME
This amendment is entered into this day of January, 2020, by and between
the City of Burlingame, a Municipal Corporation existing under the laws of the State of California,
herein called the "City," and Lisa K. Goldman ("Ms. Goldman"), as follows:
RECITALS
A. Ms. Goldman is currently serving as City Manager for the City of Burlingame pursuant to that
contract denominated "Agreement Between the City of Burlingame and Lisa K. Goldman for
Employment as City Manager of the City of Burlingame" ("Employment Agreement"), entered
into on November 19, 2012, and amended on January 6, 2014, January 5, 2015, January 3,
2017, January 16, 2018, and January 7, 2019.
B. Ms. Goldman has successfully completed her seventh year with the City. Subsequent to a
performance evaluation, the City Council determined that her salary should be increased by
3% effective the first pay period of January 2020.
C. Both parties are amenable to these changes and desire that all other terms and conditions of
the existing Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Paragraph 5, Monthly Compensation, of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to
provide that the City shall pay Ms. Goldman a salary of $21,343.20 per month.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Ms. Goldman have executed this Amendment as of the date
indicated above.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Emily Beach, Mayor
ATTEST:
LISA K. GOLDMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk
Kathleen Kane, City Attorney
City of Burlingame Salary Schedule
Amended
1/6/2020
Class Title
Step A
Step B
Step C
Step D
Step E
A109 ACCOUNTANT I
MONTHLY
6,737.08
7,073.24
7,418.67
7,794.24
8,183.72
BIWEEKLY
3,109.42
3,264.57
3,424.00
3,597.34
3,777.10
HRLY.RATE
38.87
40.81
42.80
44.97
47.21
A104 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT I
MONTHLY
4,604.21
4,838.36
5,079.47
5,322.89
5,577.91
BIWEEKLY
2,125.02
2,233.09
2,344.37
2,456.72
2,574.42
HRLY.RATE
26.56
27.91
29.30
30.71
32.18
A160 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT II
MONTHLY
5,079.47
5,322.89
5,577.91
5,835.25
6,122.72
BIWEEKLY
2,344.37
2,456.72
2,574.42
2,693.19
2,825.87
HRLY.RATE
29.30
30.71
32.18
33.66
35.32
A102 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT III
MONTHLY
5,835.25
6,122.72
6,424.10
6,746.35
7,084.83
BIWEEKLY
2,693.19
2,825.87
2,964.97
3,113.70
3,269.92
HRLY.RATE
33.66
35.32
37.06
38.92
40.87
A103 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
MONTHLY
6,438.01
6,760.26
7,096.42
7,448.81
7,822.06
BIWEEKLY
2,971.39
3,120.12
3,275.27
3,437.91
3,610.18
HRLY.RATE
37.14
39.00
40.94
42.97
45.13
D202 ACTING POLICE CHIEF
MONTHLY
16580.49
17406.32
BIWEEKLY
7652.53
8033.69
HRLY.RATE
95.66
100.42
A105 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT I MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
A100 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
D502 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
5,564.00 5,853.79 6,148.22 6,449.60 6,760.26
2,568.00 2,701.75 2,837.64 2,976.74 3,120.12
32.10 33.77 35.47 37.21 39.00
6,122.72 6,424.10 6,741.71 7,059.33 7,397.80
2,825.87 2,964.97 3,111.56 3,258.15 3,414.37
35.32 37.06 38.89 40.73 42.68
12333.09 12949.75 13597.23 14277.08 14990.92
5692.2 5976.81 6275.65 6589.42 6918.89
71.15 74.71 78.45 82.37 86.49
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/
D106 ADMIN. SVCS. DIRECTOR MONTHLY 13335.33 13986.39 14688.1 15415.18 16195.41
BIWEEKLY 6154.77 6455.26 6779.12 7114.7 7474.81
HRLY.RATE
76.93
80.69
84.74
88.93
93.44
A605 ASSISTANT ENGINEER
MONTHLY
7,896.24
8,281.09
8,672.89
9,129.60
9,590.95
BIWEEKLY
3,644.42
3,822.04
4,002.87
4,213.66
4,426.59
HRLY.RATE
45.56
47.78
50.04
52.67
55.33
ASSISTANT PARKS
B421 SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
7681.75
8065.85
8469.13
8892.59
9337.25
BIWEEKLY
3545.42
3722.7
3908.83
4104.27
4309.5
HRLY.RATE
44.32
46.53
48.86
51.3
53.87
Alll ASSISTANT PLANNER
MONTHLY
6,734.76
7,073.24
7,420.99
7,791.92
8,183.72
BIWEEKLY
3,108.35
3,264.57
3,425.07
3,596.27
3,777.10
HRLY.RATE
38.85
40.81
42.81
44.95
47.21
A608 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
MONTHLY
8,682.16
9,108.73
9,542.26
10,047.66
10,553.05
BIWEEKLY
4,007.15
4,204.03
4,404.12
4,637.38
4,870.64
HRLY.RATE
50.09
52.55
55.05
57.97
60.88
A112 ASSOCIATE PLANNER
MONTHLY
7,520.67
7,896.24
8,292.68
8,712.30
9,148.14
BIWEEKLY
3,471.08
3,644.42
3,827.39
4,021.06
4,222.22
HRLY.RATE
43.39
45.56
47.84
50.26
52.78
ASST. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
B600 WORKS
MONTHLY
13051.73
13709.3
14369.45
15105.26
15861.97
BIWEEKLY
6023.88
6327.37
6632.05
6971.66
7320.91
HRLY.RATE
75.3
79.09
82.9
87.15
91.51
5607 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC
MONTHLY
$6,200.67
$6,502.97
$6,828.71
$7,170.84
$7,538.76
BIWEEKLY
$2,861.85
$3,001.38
$3,151.71
$3,309.62
$3,479.43
HRLY.RATE
$35.77
$37.52
$39.40
$41.37
$43.49
A705 BUILDING ATTENDANT
MONTHLY
3,711.65
3,892.48
4,094.18
4,300.51
4,506.84
BIWEEKLY
1,713.07
1,796.53
1,889.62
1,984.85
2,080.08
HRLY.RATE
21.41
22.46
23.62
24.81
26.00
A706 BUILDING ATTENDANT -CS
MONTHLY
4,884.73
BIWEEKLY
2,254.49
HRLY.RATE
28.18
A603 BUILDING INSPECTOR
MONTHLY
7,467.35
7,822.06
8,230.08
8,619.56
9,034.55
BIWEEKLY
3,446.47
3,610.18
3,798.50
3,978.26
4,169.79
HRLY.RATE
43.08
45.13
47.48
49.73
52.12
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
A101 WORKER
MONTHLY
5,666.01
5,967.39
6,208.50
6,535.38
6,855.31
BIWEEKLY
2,615.08
2,754.18
2,865.46
3,016.33
3,163.99
HRLY.RATE
32.69
34.43
35.82
37.70
39.55
5603
CCTV LEADWORKER
MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
B604
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
MONTHLY
11186.1
11741.87
12321.15
12926.49
13568.39
BIWEEKLY
5162.81
5419.33
5686.69
5966.07
6262.34
HRLY.RATE
64.54
67.74
71.08
74.58
78.28
D102
CITY ATTORNEY
MONTHLY
$19,376.88
BIWEEKLY
$8,943.17
HRLY.RATE
$111.79
D109
CITY CLERK
MONTHLY
9153.45
9552.65
10022.36
10505.06
11021.7
BIWEEKLY
4224.67
4408.91
4625.71
4848.49
5086.94
HRLY.RATE
52.81
55.11
57.82
60.61
63.59
B602
CITY ENGINEER
MONTHLY
12041.19
12652.03
13262.79
13944.45
14639.79
BIWEEKLY
5557.47
5839.4
6121.29
6435.9
6756.83
HRLY.RATE
69.47
72.99
76.52
80.45
84.46
D801
CITY LIBRARIAN
MONTHLY
13790.19
14520.79
15253.98
16018.55
16798.69
BIWEEKLY
6364.7
6701.9
7040.3
7393.18
7753.24
HRLY.RATE
79.56
83.77
88
92.41
96.92
D200
CITY MANAGER
MONTHLY
$21,343.20
BIWEEKLY
$9,850.70
HRLY.RATE
$123.13
B103
CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER
MONTHLY
7558.46
7934.8
8332.86
8747.33
9186.33
BIWEEKLY
3488.52
3662.21
3845.93
4037.23
4239.84
HRLY.RATE
43.61
45.78
48.07
50.47
53
CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER
D110
AND SENIOR RISK ANALYST
MONTHLY
8003.28
8369.74
8790.33
9225.67
9688.06
0.9 FTE (36 hours/week)
BIWEEKLY
3693.82
3862.96
4057.08
4258
4471.41
HRLY.RATE
46.17
48.29
50.71
53.23
55.89
COMMUNICATION
T900
DISPATCHER I
MONTHLY
6205.74
6485.24
6794.55
7112.04
7462.11
BIWEEKLY
2864.19
2993.19
3135.95
3282.48
3444.05
HRLY.RATE
35.8
37.41
39.2
41.03
43.05
COMMUNICATION
T901 DISPATCHER II MONTHLY 6512.36 6797.28 7133.74 7462.11 7844.66
BIWEEKLY 3005.7 3137.21 3292.5 3444.05 3620.61
HRLY.RATE 37.57 39.22 41.16 43.05 45.26
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
D108 DIRECTOR MONTHLY 13904.99 14596.44 15329.65 16096.79 16897.87
BIWEEKLY 6417.69 6736.82 7075.23 7429.29 7799.02
HRLY.RATE 80.22 84.21 88.44 92.87 97.49
D100 COUNCIL MEMBER MONTHLY $590.04
BIWEEKLY $272.33
HRLY.RATE $3.40
A106 CUSTODIAN MONTHLY
4,645.94
4,859.23
5,100.33
5,369.26
5,645.14
BIWEEKLY
2,144.28
2,242.72
2,354.00
2,478.12
2,605.45
HRLY.RATE
26.80
28.03
29.43
30.98
32.57
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
B603 WORKSOPERATIONS MONTHLY
11948.13
12548.16
13172.86
13835.86
14520.79
BIWEEKLY
5514.52
5791.46
6079.78
6385.78
6701.9
HRLY.RATE
68.93
72.39
76
79.82
83.77
B107 DEPUTY FINANCE DIRECTOR MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
D501 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
10630.3 11162.61 11721.01 12302.86 12921.3
4906.29 5151.98 5409.7 5678.24 5963.68
61.33 64.4 67.62 70.98 74.55
8842.75 9284.9 9749.15 10236.58 10748.42
4081.27 4285.34 4499.61 4724.57 4960.81
51.02 53.57 56.25 59.06 62.01
D600 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
MONTHLY
14703.45
15436.65
16211.6
17020.51
17873.77
BIWEEKLY
6786.21
7124.61
7482.27
7855.62
8249.43
HRLY.RATE
84.83
89.06
93.53
98.2
103.12
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A451 SPECIALIST
MONTHLY
8,211.54
8,624.20
9,055.41
9,507.49
9,982.74
BIWEEKLY
3,789.94
3,980.40
4,179.42
4,388.07
4,607.42
HRLY.RATE
47.37
49.76
52.24
54.85
57.59
B605 ELECTRICAL SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
8529.22
8916.38
9369.03
9829.85
10323.38
BIWEEKLY
3936.56
4115.25
4324.17
4536.85
4764.64
HRLY.RATE
49.21
51.44
54.05
56.71
59.56
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS/FIRE
A301 EDUCATION SPECIALIST MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
6,356.87
6,660.57
6,994.41
7,353.75
7,706.14
2,933.94
3,074.11
3,228.19
3,394.04
3,556.68
36.67
38.43
40.35
42.43
44.46
A604
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II
MONTHLY
6,333.69
6,653.62
6,994.41
7,337.53
7,699.19
BIWEEKLY
2,923.24
3,070.90
3,228.19
3,386.55
3,553.47
HRLY.RATE
36.54
38.39
40.35
42.33
44.42
ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
A625
MANAGER
MONTHLY
7850.87
8239.94
8658.33
9087.4
9540.43
BIWEEKLY
3623.48
3803.05
3996.15
4194.19
4403.27
HRLY.RATE
45.29
47.54
49.95
52.43
55.04
D105
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
MONTHLY
6695.49
7000.74
7360.85
7728.77
8117.53
BIWEEKLY
3090.22
3231.11
3397.31
3567.12
3746.55
HRLY.RATE
38.63
40.39
42.47
44.59
46.83
FACILITIES DIVISION
B900
MANAGER
MONTHLY
9085.46
9540.8
10017.98
10519.69
11043.24
BIWEEKLY
4193.29
4403.45
4623.68
4855.24
5096.88
HRLY.RATE
52.42
55.04
57.8
60.69
63.71
5704
FACILITIES LEADWORKER
MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
5703 WORKER MONTHLY $5,664.03 $5,961.64 $6,217.07 $6,538.13 $6,854.48
BIWEEKLY $2,614.17 $2,751.53 $2,869.42 $3,017.59 $3,163.61
HRLY.RATE $32.68 $34.39 $35.86 $37.72 $39.54
D103 FINANCE DIRECTOR MONTHLY
14570.35
15298.36
16057.66
16866.55
17706.76
BIWEEKLY
6724.78
7060.78
7411.23
7784.56
8172.35
HRLY.RATE
84.06
88.26
92.64
97.31
102.15
B606 FLEET MANAGER MONTHLY
8880.93
9330.85
9794.38
10282.46
10795.06
BIWEEKLY
4098.89
4306.55
4520.48
4745.75
4982.34
HRLY.RATE
51.24
53.83
56.51
59.32
62.28
A805 GRAPHICARTIST MONTHLY
5,619.64
5,900.16
6,194.59
6,505.24
6,829.81
BIWEEKLY
2,593.68
2,723.15
2,859.04
3,002.42
3,152.22
HRLY.RATE
32.42
34.04
35.74
37.53
39.40
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST
D107 II MONTHLY 7840.95 8234.98 8628.98 9069.95 9526.59
BIWEEKLY 3618.9 3800.76 3982.6 4186.13 4396.89
HRLY.RATE 45.24 47.51 49.78 52.33 54.96
HUMAN RESOURCES
D805 DIRECTOR MONTHLY 13717.09 14445.09 15170.48 15929.78 16712.59
BIWEEKLY 6330.97 6666.97 7001.76 7352.21 7713.5
HRLY.RATE 79.14 83.34 87.52 91.9 96.42
HUMAN RESOURCES
D400 TECHNICIAN MONTHLY 5965.93 6247.14 6553.67 6880.44 7240.18
BIWEEKLY 2753.51 2883.3 3024.77 3175.59 3341.62
HRLY.RATE 34.42 36.04 37.81 39.69 41.77
INSTRUMENTATION
5610 MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN MONTHLY $6,224.10 $6,538.13 $6,863.85 $7,217.71 $7,578.60
BIWEEKLY $2,872.66 $3,017.59 $3,167.94 $3,331.25 $3,497.81
HRLY.RATE $35.91 $37.72 $39.60 $41.64 $43.72
IRRIGATION REPAIR
5404 SPECIALIST MONTHLY $5,640.60 $5,905.40 $6,200.67 $6,502.97 $6,828.71
BIWEEKLY $2,603.36 $2,725.57 $2,861.85 $3,001.38 $3,151.71
HRLY.RATE $32.54 $34.07 $35.77 $37.52 $39.40
A606 JUNIOR ENGINEER
MONTHLY
7,170.61
7,511.40
7,896.24
8,281.09
8,672.89
BIWEEKLY
3,309.51
3,466.80
3,644.42
3,822.04
4,002.87
HRLY.RATE
41.37
43.34
45.56
47.78
50.04
5605 LABORER
MONTHLY
$5,066.46
$5,321.89
$5,617.16
$5,879.62
$6,163.18
BIWEEKLY
$2,338.37
$2,456.26
$2,592.54
$2,713.68
$2,844.54
HRLY.RATE
$29.23
$30.70
$32.41
$33.92
$35.56
A801 LIBRARIAN 1
MONTHLY
5,893.20
6,178.36
6,463.51
6,795.04
7,117.28
BIWEEKLY
2,719.94
2,851.55
2,983.16
3,136.17
3,284.90
HRLY.RATE
34.00
35.64
37.29
39.20
41.06
A800 LIBRARIAN II
MONTHLY
6,489.02
6,813.58
7,140.47
7,488.22
7,880.02
BIWEEKLY
2,994.93
3,144.73
3,295.60
3,456.10
3,636.93
HRLY.RATE
37.44
39.31
41.20
43.20
45.46
B801 LIBRARIAN III
MONTHLY
8185.59
8594.64
9009.09
9475.38
9938.9
BIWEEKLY
3777.97
3966.76
4158.04
4373.25
4587.19
HRLY.RATE
47.22
49.58
51.98
54.67
57.34
A804 LIBRARY ASSISTANT
MONTHLY
4,513.80
4,747.95
4,982.10
5,211.61
5,485.18
BIWEEKLY
2,083.29
2,191.36
2,299.43
2,405.36
2,531.62
HRLY.RATE
26.04
27.39
28.74
30.07
31.65
A803 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II
MONTHLY
5,037.74
5,260.30
5,543.14
5,793.52
6,076.35
BIWEEKLY
2,325.11
2,427.83
2,SS8.37
2,673.93
2,804.47
HRLY.RATE
29.06
30.35
31.98
33.42
35.06
A802 LIBRARY ASSISTANT III
MONTHLY
5,621.96
5,879.29
6,185.31
6,493.65
6,799.67
BIWEEKLY
2,S94.75
2,713.52
2,854.76
2,997.07
3,138.31
HRLY.RATE
32.43
33.92
35.68
37.46
39.23
LIBRARY CIRCULATION
B803 SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
6456.88
6762.28
7081.28
7452.12
7795.67
BIWEEKLY
2980.1
3121.OS
3268.28
3439.44
3598
HRLY.RATE
37.25
39.01
40.85
42.99
44.98
B805 LIBRARY SERVICES MANAGER
MONTHLY
9543.54
10031.59
10527.85
11056.87
11629.46
BIWEEKLY
4404.71
4629.96
4859.01
5103.17
5367.44
HRLY.RATE
55.06
57.87
60.74
63.79
67.09
S606 MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN
MONTHLY
$6,948.22
$7,295.04
$7,667.65
$8,047.28
$8,457.37
BIWEEKLY
$3,206.88
$3,366.95
$3,538.91
$3,714.13
$3,903.41
HRLY.RATE
$40.09
$42.08
$44.23
$46.43
$48.79
B610 MANAGEMENT ANALYST
MONTHLY
8275.57
8653.5
9089.81
9539.99
10017.96
BIWEEKLY
3819.49
3993.92
4195.3
4403.07
4623.67
HRLY.RATE
47.74
49.92
52.44
55.04
57.8
A120 MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT
MONTHLY
6,713.89
7,050.05
7,397.80
7,771.05
8,158.22
BIWEEKLY
3,098.72
3,253.87
3,414.37
3,586.64
3,765.33
HRLY.RATE
38.73
40.67
42.68
44.83
47.07
A107 OFFICE ASSISTANT I
MONTHLY
4,421.06
4,645.94
4,877.77
5,109.61
5,387.81
BIWEEKLY
2,040.49
2,144.28
2,251.28
2,358.28
2,486.68
HRLY.RATE
25.51
26.80
28.14
29.48
31.08
A670 OFFICE ASSISTANT II
MONTHLY
4,843.00
5,063.24
5,318.26
5,582.55
5,837.56
BIWEEKLY
2,235.23
2,336.88
2,454.58
2,S76.56
2,694.26
HRLY.RATE
27.94
29.21
30.68
32.21
33.68
PARK MAINTENANCE
S401 LEADWORKER MONTHLY $6,224.10 $6,538.13 $6,863.85 $7,217.71 $7,578.60
BIWEEKLY $2,872.66 $3,017.59 $3,167.94 $3,331.25 $3,497.81
HRLY.RATE $35.91 $37.54 $39.60 $41.64 $43.72
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER
5407 I MONTHLY $5,085.21 $5,321.89 $5,617.16 $5,879.62 $6,163.18
BIWEEKLY $2,347.02 $2,456.26 $2,592.54 $2,713.68 $2,844.54
HRLY.RATE $29.33 $30.70 $32.41 $33.92 $35.56
PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER
5406 II MONTHLY $5,321.89 $5,617.16 $5,879.62 $6,163.18 $6,467.82
BIWEEKLY $2,456.26 $2,592.54 $2,713.68 $2,844.54 $2,985.15
HRLY.RATE $30.70 $32.41 $33.92 $35.56 $37.32
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
A201
OFFICER
MONTHLY
4,942.69
5,176.84
5,431.86
5,707.74
5,992.89
BIWEEKLY
2,281.24
2,389.31
2,507.01
2,634.34
2,765.95
HRLY.RATE
28.52
29.87
31.34
32.93
34.57
A200
PARKING SYSTEM TECHNICIAN
MONTHLY
5,369.26
5,645.14
5,904.80
6,192.27
6,502.93
BIWEEKLY
2,478.12
2,605.45
2,725.29
2,857.97
3,001.35
HRLY.RATE
30.98
32.57
34.07
35.72
37.52
PARKS & RECREATION
D705
DIRECTOR
MONTHLY
13790.19
14520.79
15253.98
16018.55
16798.69
BIWEEKLY
6364.7
6701.9
7040.3
7393.18
7753.24
HRLY.RATE
79.56
83.77
88
92.41
96.92
PARKS SUPERINTENDENT/CITY
B410
ARBORIST
MONTHLY
9873.62
10385.02
10891.25
11441.81
12034.12
BIWEEKLY
4557.06
4793.09
5026.73
5280.84
5554.21
HRLY.RATE
56.96
59.91
62.83
66.01
69.43
B420
PARKS SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
8199.25
8616.43
9049.99
9505.38
10091.61
BIWEEKLY
3784.27
3976.82
4176.92
4387.1
4657.67
HRLY.RATE
47.3
49.71
52.21
54.84
58.22
PARKS SUPERVISOR/CITY
B430
ARBORIST
MONTHLY
8398.32
8831.88
9268.14
9728.96
10328.82
BIWEEKLY
3876.15
4076.25
4277.6
4490.29
4767.15
HRLY.RATE
48.45
50.95
53.47
56.13
59.59
A114
PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR
MONTHLY
6,737.08
7,073.24
7,418.67
7,794.24
8,183.72
BIWEEKLY
3,109.42
3,264.57
3,424.00
3,597.34
3,777.10
HRLY.RATE
38.87
40.81
42.80
44.97
47.21
PERMIT TECH/GREEN
A614 BUILDING SPECIALIST MONTHLY 6,505.24 6,829.81 7,177.56 7,529.95 7,907.84
BIWEEKLY 3,002.42 3,152.22 3,312.72 3,475.36 3,649.77
HRLY.RATE
37.53
39.40
41.41
43.44
45.62
A609 PERMIT TECHNICIAN
MONTHLY
5,914.07
6,206.18
6,526.11
6,843.72
7,184.52
BIWEEKLY
2,729.57
2,864.39
3,012.05
3,158.64
3,315.93
HRLY.RATE
34.12
35.80
37.65
39.48
41.45
A108 PLANNER
MONTHLY
7,520.67
7,893.93
8,297.32
8,682.16
9,129.60
BIWEEKLY
3,471.08
3,643.35
3,829.53
4,007.15
4,213.66
HRLY.RATE
43.39
45.54
47.87
50.09
52.67
D104 PLANNING DIRECTOR
MONTHLY
13646.68
14319.88
15045.24
15593.2
16574.32
BIWEEKLY
6298.47
6609.18
6943.96
7196.86
7649.69
HRLY.RATE
78.73
82.61
86.8
89.96
95.62
B111 PLANNING MANAGER
MONTHLY
10812.96
11353.09
11916.67
12514.22
13143.05
BIWEEKLY
4990.6
5239.89
5500
5775.8
6066.02
HRLY.RATE
62.38
65.5
68.75
72.2
75.83
POLICE ADMINISTRATIVE
A205 SERVICES COORDINATOR
MONTHLY
5,770.33
6,057.81
6,354.55
6,655.94
6,975.87
BIWEEKLY
2,663.23
2,795.91
2,932.87
3,071.97
3,219.63
HRLY.RATE
33.29
34.95
36.66
38.40
40.25
M200 POLICE CAPTAIN
MONTHLY
13145.75
13784.25
14386.52
15095.2
15828.79
BIWEEKLY
6067.27
6361.96
6639.93
6967.02
7305.6
HRLY.RATE
75.84
79.52
83
87.09
91.32
D201 POLICE CHIEF
MONTHLY
15887.33
16679.44
17511.43
18377.92
19302.96
BIWEEKLY
7332.62
7698.2
8082.2
8482.12
8909.06
HRLY.RATE
91.66
96.23
101.03
106.03
111.36
A202 POLICE CLERK I
MONTHLY
4,604.21
4,838.36
5,079.47
5,322.89
5,577.91
BIWEEKLY
2,125.02
2,233.09
2,344.37
2,456.72
2,574.42
HRLY.RATE
26.56
27.91
29.30
30.71
32.18
A203 POLICE CLERK II
MONTHLY
5,079.47
5,322.89
5,577.91
5,835.25
6,122.72
BIWEEKLY
2,344.37
2,456.72
2,574.42
2,693.19
2,825.87
HRLY.RATE
29.30
30.71
32.18
33.66
35.32
A204 POLICE CLERK III
MONTHLY
7,050.05
BIWEEKLY
3,253.87
HRLY.RATE
40.67
M202 POLICE LIEUTENANT
MONTHLY
11248.62
11808.33
12401.11
13019.87
13671.69
BIWEEKLY
5191.67
5450
5723.59
6009.17
6310.01
HRLY.RATE
64.9
68.13
71.54
75.11
78.88
P200 POLICE OFFICER MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
P201 POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
7774.61
8202.07
8572.85
9023.93
9453.75
3588.28
3785.57
3956.7
4164.89
4363.27
44.85
47.32
49.46
52.06
54.54
7481.26
3452.89
43.16
M201 POLICE SERGEANT
MONTHLY
9444.31
9890.66
10381.89
10910.9
11465.89
BIWEEKLY
4358.91
4564.92
4791.64
5035.8
5291.95
HRLY.RATE
54.49
57.06
59.9
62.95
66.15
B201 POLICE SERVICES MANAGER
MONTHLY
9480.82
9954.88
10452.62
10975.25
11524.02
BIWEEKLY
4375.77
4594.56
4824.29
5065.5
5318.78
HRLY.RATE
54.7
57.43
60.3
63.32
66.48
A711 PROGRAM COORDINATOR
MONTHLY
4,024.63
4,221.69
4,430.34
4,650.58
4,884.73
BIWEEKLY
1,857.S2
1,948.47
2,044.77
2,146.42
2,254.49
HRLY.RATE
23.22
24.36
25.56
26.83
28.18
A612 PROGRAM MANAGER
MONTHLY
9,674.41
10,161.26
10,662.02
11,199.87
11,758.59
BIWEEKLY
4,465.11
4,689.81
4,920.93
5,169.17
5,427.04
HRLY.RATE
55.81
58.62
61.51
64.61
67.84
PROJECT MANAGER/GIS
A610 COORDINATOR MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
11,081.63
5,114.60
63.93
A611 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
MONTHLY
7,446.49
7,812.78
8,206.90
8,617.25
9,053.09
BIWEEKLY
3,436.84
3,605.90
3,787.80
3,977.19
4,178.35
HRLY.RATE
42.96
45.07
47.35
49.71
52.23
A701 RECREATION COORDINATOR
MONTHLY
5,805.11
6,083.31
6,370.78
6,688.39
7,019.91
BIWEEKLY
2,679.28
2,807.68
2,940.36
3,086.95
3,239.96
HRLY.RATE
33.49
35.10
36.75
38.59
40.50
RECREATION
B710 SUPERINTENDENT
MONTHLY
9543.54
10034.33
10527.85
11062.32
11632.19
BIWEEKLY
4404.71
4631.23
4859.01
5105.69
5368.7
HRLY.RATE
55.06
57.89
60.74
63.82
67.11
B700 RECREATION SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
8035.64
8452.83
8842.77
9306.3
9769.85
BIWEEKLY
3708.76
3901.31
4081.28
4295.22
4509.16
HRLY.RATE
46.36
48.77
51.02
53.69
56.36
B106 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
A602 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
B601 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
A113 SENIOR PLANNER MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
7539.2 7933.8 8356.18 8792.46 9256.57
3479.63 3661.75 3856.7 4058.06 4272.26
43.5 45.77 48.21 50.73 53.4
8,378.46 8,791.12 9,208.42 9,695.27 10,184.44
3,866.98 4,057.44 4,250.04 4,474.74 4,700.51
48.34 50.72 53.13 55.93 58.76
11465.85 12038.48 12643.8 13 273.66 13941.71
5291.93 5556.22 5835.6 6126.31 6434.64
66.15 69.45 72.95 76.58 80.43
9,129.60 9,581.67 10,059.25 10,562.33 11,095.54
4,213.66 4,422.31 4,642.73 4,874.92 5,121.02
52.67 55.28 58.03 60.94 64.01
SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS
A607 INSPECTOR MONTHLY
8,269.50
8,682.16
9,108.73
9,542.26
10,047.66
BIWEEKLY
3,816.69
4,007.15
4,204.03
4,404.12
4,637.38
HRLY.RATE
47.71
50.09
52.55
55.05
57.97
B608 STREET & SEWER SUPERVISOR MONTHLY
$7,803.57
$8,194.91
$8,607.35
$9,036.20
$9,486.13
BIWEEKLY
$3,601.64
$3,782.27
$3,972.63
$4,170.55
$4,378.22
HRLY.RATE
$45.02
$47.28
$49.66
$52.14
$54.73
STREET, SEWER &
DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE
5604 WORKER MONTHLY $5,321.89 $5,617.16 $5,879.62 $6,163.18 $6,467.82
BIWEEKLY $2,456.26 $2,592.54 $2,713.68 $2,844.54 $2,985.15
HRLY.RATE $30.70 $32.41 $33.92 $35.56 $37.32
STREET, SEWER AND
5601 DOWNTOWN LEADWORKER MONTHLY $6,224.10 $6,538.13 $6,863.85 $7,217.71 $7,578.60
BIWEEKLY $2,872.66 $3,017.59 $3,167.94 $3,331.25 $3,497.81
HRLY.RATE $35.91 $37.72 $39.60 $41.64 $43.72
STREETS, STORM DRAINS, AND
B607 SEWER DIVISIONS MANAGER MONTHLY 9085.46 9540.8 10017.98 10519.69 11043.24
BIWEEKLY 4193.29 4403.45 4623.68 4855.24 5096.88
HRLY.RATE 52.42 55.04 57.8 60.69 63.71
TRAFFIC SIGN & PAINT
S602 LEADWORKER MONTHLY $6,224.10 $6,538.13 $6,863.85 $7,217.71 $7,578.60
BIWEEKLY $2,872.66 $3,017.59 $3,167.94 $3,331.25 $3,497.81
HRLY.RATE $35.91 $37.72 $39.60 $41.64 $43.72
A601 TRAFFIC -CIVIL ENGINEER MONTHLY
8,281.09
8,672.89
9,129.60
9,590.95
10,073.16
BIWEEKLY
3,822.04
4,002.87
4,213.66
4,426.59
4,649.15
HRLY.RATE
47.78
50.04
52.67
55.33
58.11
A600 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER MONTHLY
9,546.90
10,029.11
10,529.87
11,053.81
11,614.85
BIWEEKLY
4,406.26
4,628.82
4,859.94
5,101.76
5,360.70
HRLY.RATE
55.08
57.86
60.75
63.77
67.01
S405 TREE LEADWORKER MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
5409 TREE MAINTENANCE WORKER MONTHLY $5,453.12 $5,764.79 $6,027.26 $6,320.18 $6,629.51
BIWEEKLY $2,516.83 $2,660.67 $2,781.81 $2,917.01 $3,059.78
HRLY.RATE $31.46 $33.26 $34.78 $36.46 $38.25
S411 TREE WORKER
MONTHLY
$5,628.88
$5,893.69
$6,191.30
$6,495.94
$6,824.02
BIWEEKLY
$2,597.94
$2,720.17
$2,857.52
$2,998.13
$3,149.55
HRLY.RATE
$32.48
$34.00
$35.72
$37.47
$39.37
UTILITIES
S400 INSPECTOR/LOCATOR
MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
B500 WATER DIVISION MANAGER
MONTHLY
9085.46
9540.8
10017.98
10519.69
11043.24
BIWEEKLY
4193.29
4403.45
4623.68
4855.24
5096.88
HRLY.RATE
52.42
55.04
57.8
60.69
63.71
WATER MAINTENANCE
5501 LEADWORKER MONTHLY $6,224.10 $6,538.13 $6,863.85 $7,217.71 $7,578.60
BIWEEKLY $2,872.66 $3,017.59 $3,167.94 $3,331.25 $3,497.81
HRLY.RATE $35.91 $37.72 $39.60 $41.64 $43.72
WATER MAINTENANCE
5503 WORKER MONTHLY $5,321.89 $5,617.16 $5,879.62 $6,163.18 $6,467.82
BIWEEKLY $2,456.26 $2,592.54 $2,713.68 $2,844.54 $2,985.15
HRLY.RATE $30.70 $32.41 $33.92 $35.56 $37.32
5502 WATER METER REPAIRER MONTHLY $5,373.44 $5,631.22 $5,900.72 $6,195.98 $6,502.97
BIWEEKLY $2,480.06 $2,599.03 $2,723.41 $2,859.68 $3,001.38
HRLY.RATE $31.01 $32.49 $34.05 $35.75 $37.52
B501 WATER OPERATIONS SUPERVIS MONTHLY
$7,803.57
$8,194.91
$8,607.35
$9,036.20
$9,486.13
BIWEEKLY
$3,601.64
$3,782.27
$3,972.63
$4,170.55
$4,378.22
HRLY.RATE
$45.02
$47.28
$49.66
$52.14
$54.73
WATER QUALITY AND METER
S508 LEAD WORKER MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
WATER QUALITY AND METER
5507 TECHNICIAN MONTHLY
BIWEEKLY
HRLY.RATE
$5,617.16 $5,898.37 $6,193.64 $6,502.97 $6,828.71
$2,592.54 $2,722.33 $2,858.61 $3,001.38 $3,151.71
$32.41 $34.03 $35.73 $37.52 $39.40
B503 WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
MONTHLY
$7,803.57
$8,194.91
$8,607.35
$9,036.20
$9,486.13
BIWEEKLY
$3,601.64
$3,782.27
$3,972.63
$4,170.55
$4,378.22
HRLY.RATE
$45.02
$47.28
$49.66
$52.14
$54.73
WATER SERVICE &
S505 OPERATIONS TECHNICIAN
MONTHLY
$6,224.10
$6,538.13
$6,863.85
$7,217.71
$7,578.60
BIWEEKLY
$2,872.66
$3,017.59
$3,167.94
$3,331.25
$3,497.81
HRLY.RATE
$35.91
$37.72
$39.60
$41.64
$43.72
A110 ZONING TECHNICIAN
MONTHLY
6,419.47
6,727.80
7,061.64
7,420.99
7,782.65
BIWEEKLY
2,962.83
3,105.14
3,259.22
3,425.07
3,591.99
HRLY.RATE
37.04
38.81
40.74
42.81
44.90
NOTES
All positions are 40-hour week, unless otherwise noted
Effective 6/26/2017
612612017 3% salary increase for all AFSCME bargaining unit positions, per applicable MOUs
Amended 7110117 FY2017-18 budget classification and compensation revisions
Amended 8121117 classification and compensation revisions
Amended 9118117 classification and compensation revisions
Amended 121251173% salary increase Department Head and Unrepresented Unit, Teamsters, AFSCME BAMM,
2% salary increase POA, Police Sergeants, Police Sergaeants, Police Administrators Units, per applicable MOUs
3% salary increase City Manager, per employment agreement
Amended 612512018 3% salary increase for AFSCMEAdmin and Maint bargaining unit per applicable MOUs
3% salary increase City Attorney, per employment agreement
Amended 9117118 classification and compensation revisions
Amended 121241187 3% salary increase Department Head and Unrepresented Unit AFSCME BAMM,
5% salary increase POA, Police Sergeants, Police Sergeants, Police Administrators Units, per applicable MOUs
4% salary increase City Manager, per employment agreement
Amended 1121119 4.5%salary increase Teamsters Unit effective 1212412018
Amended 3113119 classification and compensation revisions
Amended 6117119 adding Environmental Regulatory Compliance Manager
Amended 6117119 4.5%salary increase AFSCME Admin Unit effective 6124119 per applicable MOU
Amended 8119119 4.5%salary increase AFSCME Maintenance Unit, effective 8119119 per applicable MOU
Amended 12123119 3% salary increase Department Head and Unrepresented Unit
2.5% Teamsters, per applicable MOU
4% salary increase POA, Police Sergeants, Police Administrators, per applicable MOUs
4.5% AFSCME BAM, per applicable MOU
Amended 11612020 3%salary increase City Manager
� CITY
Memorandum
icQ
.PORMTRD
To: City Council
Date: January 6, 2020
From: Mayor Emily Beach
Subject: Committee Report
1. Caltrain Modernization Local Policy Makers Group (LPMG)
Representatives along the Caltrain corridor from Morgan Hill to San Francisco meet monthly at
SamTrans Headquarters to receive updates from Caltrain and High Speed Rail Authority
(CHSRA) staff. Chaired by Caltrain Joint Powers Board of Directors Member. I've served as
Vice Chair since 2016.
Caltrain update
Infrastructure like foundations, poles, and wires for Caltrain's electric fleet (coming 2022) has
been installed here in Burlingame in 2019 and throughout the 51-mile corridor. Sometimes It's
noisy at night, but the construction goes in phases and community members can sign up for
Caltrain alerts to better anticipate when the work will take place. From a policy perspective, the
LPMG's focal point this year has been Caltrain's 2040 business plan. This committee is an
important stakeholder in Caltrain's business plan development. Significant rail investments
($2.3+ billion) are already underway in the corridor to improve rail service and reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and traffic on our roadways. Looking ahead over the next 20 years, billions ($25-
30) more will be needed to realize the full potential of electrification, support anticipated 40%
population growth along Caltrain corridor, and to capture billions in new economic output for the
region. Caltrain does not have a dedicated funding source to make these infrastructure and
program investments a reality, so new revenue streams will be needed. Technical studies for the
business plan are still underway that address ridership, governance, equity, and funding strategies
among other topics. Caltrain expects the business plan to be completed mid-2020.
High Speed Rail update
High Speed Rail selected their "preferred alternative" through the SF/SJ corridor in September,
which paves the way for the release of draft environmental documents for this section as early as
February 2020, but no later than Spring 2020. Notable highlights for this section include the
construction of a new light maintenance facility located in East Brisbane, and zero passing tracks
in Redwood City. (Additional passing tracks along the corridor may be required for Caltrain's
2040 service vision, but not for HSR.) Once the HSRA releases the Draft EIR, a 45-day public
comment period will follow and include a series of open houses, public hearings, and outreach
activities.
What many Burlingame residents may not realize is that HSR is well under construction in the
central valley. By the end of 2020, as many as 350 miles may be underway. They anticipate the
1
Beach Committee Report January 6, 2020
entire Phase 1 (San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim) will be environmentally cleared by
2022 and ready to move toward construction. Key challenge for HSR is the engineering design
and funding plan to connect the train through the Pacheco pass. We've been told the segments in
the Central Valley and between SF-SJ are already funded by the original citizen -approved bond
measure. CHSRA currently projects HSR service will be operational and open to the public from
SF to Bakersfield by 2029, SF to LA by 2033.
The segment between SF and SJ is HSR's next top priority, and will include significant station
improvements at Millbrae, SF, and SJ — plus the Brisbane maintenance facility. Construction in
other cities like Burlingame include quad gates, fencing, and safety improvements at -grade
crossings. In fact, all the physical infrastructure required to implement quiet zones will be
constructed (and paid for) by HSR. HSR's plan does not include funding for grade separations,
however, HSR has demonstrated willingness ness to contribute to San Mateo's 251h Avenue Grade
Separation — so this should also be considered for Broadway's funding strategy.
Major concerns for LPMG include grade separations, both for safety -- and to reduce
traffic/gridlock with extended gate downtime. Also making sure HSR coordinates with Caltrain's
2040 service vision in terms of rail schedules on the "blended system" (traveling on the existing
tracks from SF to SJ.) Significant environmental work, public process, and schedule coordination
lies ahead for rail planners in our corridor. Spring of 2020 will be an important moment for public
engagement here on the Peninsula.
2) San Mateo County Transportation Authority
Busy year. We developed and adopted SMCTA's 5-year strategic plan, which provides the policy
framework for allocating both Measure A and new Measure W funds, which together generate
approximately $150m annually for County transportation projects. We allocated millions of
dollars for various transportation infrastructure including $18 million for the next phase of
Burlingame's Broadway Grade Separation, broke ground on 92/101 interchange improvements,
began construction on the southern segment of US 101 express lanes, and celebrated the opening
US 101 Willow Interchange — big win for East Palo Alto and Menlo Park. However, the most
significant and time intensive policy work for elected members of SMCTA was the establishment
of the San Mateo County Express Lane Joint Powers Authority (SMCEL JPA) -- see below.
3) San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority (SMCEL JPA)
The first six months of 2019 were filled with intense meetings between SMCTA and C/CAG to
determine whether San Mateo County or MTC would retain ownership over US 101 San Mateo
County Express Lanes. This was a high -stakes (and highly contested) debate within and beyond
San Mateo County. Effective express lane toll policies will improve traffic congestion on
highways and local roads, plus generate substantial revenues that can be reinvested locally. I
helped lead the effort to establish the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority,
which maintains local policy and financial control over over the express lanes, rather than
abdicating this authority to MTC — which MTC strongly wanted. Currently, I serve as a Board
Member on this new JPA, and also as the SMCTA representative to our JPA's finance committee.
SMCTA must loan the JPA $100 million to build the project, and will also serve as financial
backstop for all express lane operations until the toll lanes generate their own revenue starting late
2021 and 2022. The finance committee has been a significant additional duty.
4) Commute.org Board of Directors
The reliability of our County's free commuter shuttle system dramatically improved in 2019
2
Beach Committee Report January 6, 2020
compared to one year ago, when our shuttle vendor struggled from a severe labor shortage
resulting in routine cancellations. Lots of hard work and negotiations by Commute.org staff and
shuttle vendor to stabilize the program. I'm currently serving on a sub -committee that meets
monthly to develop a 5-year visionary strategic plan for this organization. This is an exciting
opportunity because transportation technology and public policy is changing so rapidly.
5) League of California Cities
a) League of California Cities - Peninsula Division Board
Attended monthly meetings to discuss legislation/advocacy for division and local cities, plan
division quarterly luncheons, and fundraise for League advocacy efforts. In March 2019, I chaired
a quarterly round -table luncheon where approximately 70 representatives from jurisdictions
throughout the division (including representatives from offices of our Sacramento legislators) met
to consider their positions on principles behind new housing legislation. The format was later used
by League staff as a model for our State Board of Directors housing policy discussion.
b) League of Cities Environmental Quality Policy Committee
Committee met four times in Sacramento and Long Beach, and recommended positions on
legislation related to organics/recycling regulations and funding for new facilities, storm water,
and Community Choice Aggregation (CCA's). Less active legislative year compared to 2018,
since primary focus of the Governor, Assembly, and Senate was housing.
c League of California Cities State -Wide Board of Directors
This was my first year as the Peninsula Division's Representative on the League's State-wide
Board of Directors (a 50-member body.) The Peninsula Division includes the cities of San Jose,
San Francisco, and all cities in between — although occasionally SF, SJ, and other big cities send
their own representatives to the Board Meetings. The Board represents all 480 member cities
throughout California, has fiduciary responsibility, oversees staff, establishes policy goals, and
advises the League's lobbying staff as legislation evolves throughout the year.
I attended my first annual strategic priority setting meeting on 12/6/19 for the upcoming 2020
legislative year. Final priorities (following one day of roundable debates and 3+ hours of Board
final discussion) can be found here: htlps://www.cacities.org/Top/News/Press-
Releases/2019/League-of-California-Cities-Board-of-Directors-Ado
One of the most interesting highlights from our Board discussion followed a heated debate about
whether to include the words "climate change" in the League's resiliency goal. Many rural,
conservative cities strongly opposed the language. Remarkably, inclusion of the "climate change"
triumphed, which felt like an important sea change for the organization. It may seem small, but it
was an important step forward, particularly as a member of the League's Environmental Quality
Policy Committee.
6) San Mateo/Santa Clara Grand Boulevard Initiative Task Force(GBI)
I served on the GBI Task Force Long -Term Vision Subcommittee to re-evaluate mission and
vision of the Grand Boulevard Initiative after 13 years. GBI reached a crossroads in its evolution
and the group will refocus its efforts on mobility along the corridor. Moving forward, the Task
Force will convene annually on specific topics that are trending and/or of interest to the members
and may include corridor tours of El Camino Real. In order to continue to share best practices
along the corridor and explore ways to improve the mobility and transportation options, staff s
3
Beach Committee Report January 6, 2020
GBI Working Committee, comprised of transportation planners and engineers from San Mateo
County and Santa Clara County, will meet quarterly.
7) Burlingame's Economic Development Subcommittee
All meeting minutes are posted on the City's website. Many productive conversations this year
with property owners about downtown zoning improvements that could help increase vibrancy
and fill vacant properties. We learned a lot from our April community convening `Burlingame
Talks Shop." Staff is working to synthesize input from the public, business leaders, property
owners and Council in preparation for our upcoming zoning update. We monitored our
committee's efforts to work collaboratively with property owners to improve the aesthetics of
vacant shops, and it was successful. Hoteliers shared their input regarding short-term rentals, and
look forward to beautification and safety improvements on our Bayfront roadways/public spaces.
They would like the City to address poor upkeep of vacant spaces/lots particularly on the
Bayfront. We completed Broadway facade grant improvement program and look forward to
allocating funds hopefully this spring.
8) C/CAG's (City/County Association of Governments) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC)
The most important highlight from our committee in 2020: we carefully evaluated and scored (via
site visits, presentations, and application review) 14 grant applications from 13 jurisdictions for
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements throughout San Mateo County. Many great
projects proposed, yet not enough funding for demand. (Nearly $4.35 million requested for only
$1.95m of available funding.) Unfortunately, Burlingame's mixed use pathway along Highway
Road recommended by staff, BPAC, and TSPC did not make the cut. In 2020,1 am optimistic that
two converging forces will benefit Burlingame's competitiveness for new BPAC funds: the
completion of our Bike/Ped master plan which will help us systematically prioritize our most
compelling projects, plus the arrival of Measure W funds overseen by SMCTA — which will more
than double the amount of local funding for bike/ped improvements starting in 2020.
9) County Office of Education Safe Routes to Schools Committee
This committee is information -sharing, rather than governance. During my first year on the
committee, I learned a lot about how SRS works closely with schools, and how effective cities
participate in walking audits, infrastructure improvements, and education forums around school
zones to make walking and biking to school safer and more accessible.
10) Burlingame's El Camino Real Task Force
Significant momentum this year in preparation for Caltrans' public engagement regarding
roadway and sidewalk rehabilitation on our section of El Camino Real. City Manager, Director of
Public Works, Brownrigg, and Beach met with Caltrans' new District 4 Director and his staff at
their HQ in Oakland early in 2019. This re -invigorated Caltrans commitment to our Burlingame
El Camino Real Task Force's vision and recommendations. Multiple follow-up meetings
followed, including two large-scale Caltrans staff site visits to Burlingame, each with 15-20
Caltrans staffers. Progress on this project is a high priority for all of us. Caltrans is engaged with
the City and our El Camino Real Task Force in preparation for its upcoming public education
meeting in January. Next steps will include a thorough environmental study and public
engagement for their proposal to rehabilitate Burlingame's ECR roadway and sidewalks.
0