Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2001.07.16 BURLINGAME ooLoJ�eg BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2001 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER At this time, City Attorney Anderson reported on the Closed Session: a. Personnel Matter(Government Code Section 54957): one matter discussed with the City Manager. b. Pending Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)): City of Burlingame vs. Judy Gladysz, San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 412328; City Council instructed City Attorney Anderson regarding ongoing negotiations in this matter. c. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: City Negotiators Jim Nantell, Bob Bell, and IEDA; Labor Organizations AFSCME Locals 2190 and 829, and BAMM. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIEANCE TO THE FLAG Recited at the Financing Authority Meeting by Iry Amstrup. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: Coffey, Galligan, Spinelli, O'Mahony Council Absent: Janney(attending SamTrans Board of Directors Meeting) 4. MINUTES The following corrections were noted on the July 2, 2001 minutes: page (2), all of the Councilmembers visited the site at 1524 Los Montes; page (2) the setback is 5', not 5"; on page 7, "Councilman" is misspelled, under Council Committee Reports, Cotchett and celebration is misspelled. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of July 2, 2001; seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 with Councilwoman Janney absent. Vice Mayor Spinelli made a motion to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of July 9, 2001; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved by voice vote, 3-0-2, with Councilman Coffey abstaining due to not being present at that meeting, and Councilwoman Janney being absent. At this time, Mayor Galligan pulled the following items from the consent calendar for further discussion: 8a) AFSCME Agreement, 8b) BAMM Agreement, 8g) Resolution Approving Agreement 1 Burlingame City Council July 16,2001 for Development of a Synthetic Grass Field at the Burlingame High School Football Field and 8m) Direction for Voting at July 20, 2001 Cities Selection Committee and Council of Cities Meeting. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ADOPT ORDINANCE #1660 ESTABLISHING 2001/02 WATER RATES Assistant City Manager Becker noted water rates are reviewed annually following preparation of the proposed budget. The proposed consumption rate increase from $2.45/1,000 gallons to $2.54/1,000 gallons 3.7% and a$1.89 increase (31.5%) in the monthly service charge are caused by a 3.7% increase in the cost of water purchased from the San Francisco Water Department, and the need to continue funding the five-year capital improvement program for the water system. The recommended transfer from the water fund for capital improvements is $550,000, up from $450,000 in 2000-01; noted at the May 17 Council meeting, DPW Bagdon presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan showed total estimated capital improvement needs for the water enterprise of$23 to $50 million. Over the next five years, the city is expected to spend $7 million on water projects, and does not include the anticipated improvements needed for the entire Hetch Hetchy system. The present capacity for capital funding at current rates is only$550,000. A comprehensive financial plan for these capital improvements will be done this coming year. A component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the water rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. The water fund currently carries a$1 million loan from the general fund. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Councilman Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance#1658 Establishing 2001/02 Water Rates; seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 with Councilwoman Janney absent. b. ADOPT ORDINANCE #1658 ESTABLISHING 2001/02 SEWER RATES Assistant City Manager Becker noted that the Federal Environmental Protection Agency regulations require that operation and maintenance costs for the city's sewer enterprise be paid from the sewer rate with a specific method for calculating the rate based on flow and loading. For the determination of the rate, the revenue required was reduced by the estimated amount to be received from Burlingame Hills and Hillsborough. Their respective flows and loadings were removed from the program. The primary reason for the rate increase is to continue accumulation of funding for the capital improvement program for the sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant; noted at the May 17 Council meeting, DPW Bagdon presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan showed total estimated capital improvement needs for the sewer enterprise of$25 to $50 million. A comprehensive financial plan for these capital improvements will be done this coming year. A component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the sewer rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing July 16,2001 2 Burlingame City Council was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Ordinance#1660 establishing 2001/02 sewer rates; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 with Councilwoman Janney absent. c. ADOPT ORDINANCE TO INSTALL A STOP SIGN ON TROUSDALE DRIVE AT QUESADA WAY DPW Bagdon noted the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered a petition circulated by residents. One issue raised as a result of the petition was the need to add stop signs for access to Trousdale Drive from side streets. Based on this concern, staff developed traffic counts and speed information for various areas, including the intersection of Quesada Way and Trousdale Drive. Staff recommended that the stop sign be considered by the TSPC as it met the traffic volume warrant. Although there is a low traffic accident history and there would be increased braking noise and gas use, staff believes that the benefits of a stop sign outweigh these concerns. The stop sign would provide a more controlled flow during peak traffic periods, especially for eastbound traffic, which backs up as many as ten vehicles in each lane. Also, the stop sign would better facilitate pedestrian crossings. Therefore, staff supports the Commission recommendation. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Councilman Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance#1659 to install a stop sign on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Janney absent. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Linda Gregory, representing AFSCME and BAMM, thanked Council for their support in the negotiations for the labor contract for the two labor groups. Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington Way, stated he was concerned about the approval of the synthetic turf at Burlingame High School and the loss of natural resources. Dan Anderson, 728 Vernon Way, spoke regarding the Teen Center and wanted to know what type of parameters were given to the Committee and Architects regarding the center. Charles Burn, 956 Jackling Drive, Hillsborough, noted that the grass football field at Burlingame High School has already been torn out; wanted to know if it will be replaced with Astroturf or new grass. At this time, Mayor Galligan requested discussion of items 8a) and 8b) that was previously pulled from the consent calendar. 8a. RESOLUTION#75-2001 APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT WITH AFSCME LOCALS 829 AND 2190 Human Resources Director Bell recommended that Council approve Resolution#75-2001 approving the three-year labor agreement with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 829 and 2190. These two local groups represent non-management miscellaneous employees of the City of Burlingame. 3 Burlingame City Council July 16,2001 Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve item 8a) on the consent calendar; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1,with Councilwoman Janney absent. 8b. RESOLUTION #76-2001 APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT WITH BAMM City Manager Nantell recommended Council approve Resolution#76-2001 approving the three and one-half(3-1/2) year labor agreement with the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers (BAMM). This unit represents the miscellaneous management employees of the City of Burlingame. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve items and 8b) on the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Janney absent. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. UPDATE BY SUPERINTENDENT TOM MOHR TO COUNCIL/COMMUNITY ON PROGRAMS OF THE SAN MATEO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Tom Mohr made a presentation to Council on programs in the school district, including the boundary study and modernization of the high schools. At this time, Mayor Galligan requested that Acting Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz discuss item 8g) on the Consent Calendar: 8g) RESOLUTION #81-2001 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SYNTHETIC GRASS FIELD AT THE BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL FIELD Acting Parks &Recreation Director Schwartz stated that the goal throughout this process has been to maximize the amount of resources in Burlingame. There has been a lot of research conducted on the synthetic grass field to make sure it is the best thing for the entire community, not just for the school children or community members. Noted he spoke with several facilities throughout the country regarding the materials, visited fields currently using the material and also brought back samples. This issue has been discussed several times at Parks & Recreation Commission meetings; the school board has asked many of the same questions asked by Council. Mayor Galligan noted there was a minor adjustment in wording of the contract; the school district has requested that, in the event there is a playoff or championship game that is not on the schedule, it would take priority over any other scheduled events. Vice Mayor Spinelli made a motion to approve Resolution#81-2001 approving the agreement for development of a synthetic grass field at the Burlingame High School Football Field; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Janney absent. b. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE BALLOT MEASURES REGARDING (1) July 16,2001 4 Burlingame City Council CONTINUING THE 10% TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX RATE; (2) CONTINUING THE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE TAX AT $100 PER YEAR; AND (3) ESTABLISHING A COMMERCIAL PARKING TAX AT THE RATE OF 5% OF GROSS REVENUE Mayor Galligan noted he will not participate in the discussion regarding the establishment of a commercial parking tax due to his ownership in a similar business in a neighboring city. City Attorney Anderson noted that on July 2, 2001, a public hearing was held regarding this matter. Staff is recommending that these taxes be considered for submission to the voters in the November election. The first tax is a tax rate increase that was adopted in 1991 in which the transient occupancy tax was increased from 8% to 10%; the 2% increment is a significant portion of the City's general fund, which has helped fund various projects in the City. The second tax concerns the business license tax, which was increased from $50 to $100 in 1992. It is not as significant to the City's general fund as the transient occupancy tax but it still generates approximately$275,000 per year. The third tax that is suggested to the Council: is for establishment of a tax on parking facilities. Currently, there is a tax in the City that is placed on airport parking facilities, which is based on 5% of gross receipts and generates approximately$250,000 per year. Two versions will be presented for consideration by the Council; the first version would place a tax on commercial parking facilities but exempt a significant portion of those facilities; the second version would not contain those exemptions. Two categories would be exempt in the first version: a) Commercial parking facilities where parking is not the predominant use of the parcel. (I.e., hotel parking lots, parking lots where no charge is imposed, publicly owned and operated lots, apartment and condominium parking lots, company-controlled parking lots, and car dealers who would be placing their inventory on another parcel.) b) tow companies that offer other services. Where the tow company is operating a parking lot in the City but not conducting another predominant use on the site, there WOULD be a tax imposed on the storage charge the towing company collects. This is aimed at parking lots that do not seem to generate any other revenue to support services that are provided to them (i.e., do not pay sales taxes or transient occupancy taxes.) The second version takes away those exemptions and basically states that if a company charges for parking, the owner would pay on the gross receipts that were gained from the private parking. Council gave City Attorney Anderson direction on the versions they would like to see placed on the ballot in November. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR c. RESOLUTION#77-2001 AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM CONTINGENCY RESERVE FOR ADDITIONAL POSITION IN HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 5 Burlingame City Council July 16,2001 Human Resources Director Bell recommended Council approve Resolution#77-2001 authorizing the addition of one Human Resources Specialist (1.0 full time equivalent) and approve the transfer of $70,000 from the contingency reserve. d. RESOLUTION #78-2001 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR EMS CLINICAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST Fire Chief Reilly recommended Council approve Resolution#78-2001 authorizing the "Agreement for Joint EMS Training Program" amongst the cities of Burlingame, Millbrae, the Town of Hillsborough and the California Department of Forestry—Santa Cruz/San Mateo Ranger unit and the City of San Mateo. e. RESOLUTION#79-2001 APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM POLICE BUDGET TO POLICE FURNITURE ERGONOMIC UPGRADE PROJECT Police Chief Missel recommended Council approve Resolution#79-2001 authorizing the transfer of $30,000 from the 2000/01 Police Department's operating budget to complete a workstation refurbishing project. f. RESOLUTION#80-2001 REVISING PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT AND PAYMENT OF SELF-INSURANCE CLAIMS City Attorney Anderson recommended Council approve Resolution#80-2001 to establish higher limits for administrative denial and settlement of self-insurance claims and clarifying settlement for workers compensation claims. h. RESOLUTION #82-2001 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BURLINGAME CORPORATION YARD RECONSTRUCTION Director of Public Works Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution#82-2001 awarding the subject contract to Dennis J. Amoroso Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of$9,928,000. i. RESOLUTION#83-2001 AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORD BY DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES,AND RESOLUTION #84-2001 AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS BY DESIGNATED SALES TAX CONSULTANT Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director Becker recommended Council approve Resolution 83-2001 and 84-2001 authorizing the examination of sales tax records by designated city employees and city sales tax consultant. j. INFORMATION REPORT REGARDING BOND SIZING AND CALENDAR OF ACTIVITY FOR BIDS AND CLOSING OF BOND ISSUE Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director Becker noted in his staff report that Council previously authorized up to $15,000,0000, and staff and the audit committee concurred that this July 16,2001 6 Burlingame City Council amount should be issued. The highly favorable (3-5%)rates anticipated by the financial advisor, the AA rating received by the City from Standard and Poors, and the need to conserve water and sewer enterprise cash in the near term to fund other projects together supported the $15,000,000 issue. k. CONSENT TO REPRESENTATION BY SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL IN SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER VS. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, SAN MATEO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 416800 City Attorney Anderson recommended Council authorize the County Counsel to represent the City of Burlingame in the recently filed lawsuit by San Francisco Baykeeper challenging the Regional Water Board permit decision-making. 1. SPECIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR A WOODEN FENCE WITHIN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 2901 ARGUELLO DRIVE Director of Public Works recommended Council approve the attached Special Encroachment Permit for a wooden fence in accordance with the drawings, permit and conditions outlined in the staff report. Vice Mayor Spinelli made a motion to approve the consent calendar with the exception of items a, b, g and m; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Janney absent. At this time, Mayor Galligan brought forth item 8m from the consent calendar: 8m) DIRECTION FOR VOTING AT JULY 20,2001, CITIES SELCTION COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL OF CITIES MEETING Mayor Galligan requested direction from Council regarding the ABAG position that will be voted on at the Council of Cities meeting. There was no direction given. 9. COUNCL COMMITTEE REPORTS Vice Mayor Spinelli attended two Airport Roundtable subcommittee meetings. Councilman Coffey was out of town and didn't attend any committee meetings. Councilwoman O'Mahony attended the San Mateo County Investment Advisory Council, visited Interfaith Hospitality at St. Catherines, former Supervisor John Ward's garden party, attended the Police, Fire and Recreation Night, various 4th of July block parties, Italian Catholic Federation's awarding of scholarships, and the Tongan Festival. Mayor Galligan attended the Historical Society board meeting, various 4th of July events, meeting regarding the TOT tax, Music in the Park at Washington Park, Burlingame High School Board of Trustees meeting, former Supervisor John Ward's garden party, event hosted by Ted Lempert, and gave a tour of City Hall, and attended an event at Roosevelt School. 10. OLD BUSINESS Vice Mayor Spinelli noted that Burlingame is the beta test site for a product that will archive the Council and Planning Commission meetings that will be accessible from the City website. 7 Burlingame City Council July 16,2001 11. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Planning, July 9, 2001 b. Department Reports: Building, June, 2001 c. Required Review for Compliance with the Conditional Use Permit for the Interfaith Hospitality Network at Three Churches in Burlingame d. Letter from Ruth Jacobs, 2965 Arguello Drive, regarding potential fire hazard in Mills Canyon area, and response from Fire Chief e. Letter from Dan Lopez, 1116-A Chula Vista Avenue, regarding leaf blower nuisance f. Letter from Acting Parks &Recreation Director responding to Eric Mendell's June 21, 2001, lettering regarding proposal to install synthetic turf at Burlingame High School's football field g. Letter from residents of Drake and Sanchez Avenues regarding neighborhood safety concerns h. Letter of resignation from Civil Service Commissioner Keith Kutner i. Letter from Bay Area Quality Management District regarding Air District proposals to regulate wood smoke 13. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. Ann T. Musso City Clerk July 16,2001 8 Burlingame City Council BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY City of Burlingame BURLINGAME Ri CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD , REGULAR MEETING-MONDAY,JULY 16, 2001 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 \ (650)558-7200 PAGE 1 OF 1 SUGGESTED ACTION 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES -Minutes of Regular Meeting, June 18, 2001 Approval 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 6. CONSENT a. Resolution Authorizing Deposit of Bond Proceeds with State Approve Local Agency Investment Fund 7. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558- 7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA June 18, 2001 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame Financing Authority was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Joe Galligan. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by David Peterson. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI Council Absent: None 4. MINUTES Councilmember Janney made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 4, 2001, Financing Authority meeting; seconded by Councilmember Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS - There were no public comments. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Resolution Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Lease Revenue Bonds and Related Necessary Actions and Approval of Documents to Finance Corporation yard Reconstruction Administrative Services Director Becker reviewed his staff report, explaining that approval of the resolution would approve issuance and set forth the mechanism to proceed with obtaining competitive bids and sale of the bonds for the project. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the lease revenue bonds and the approval of the documents to finance the corporation yard reconstruction. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Janney; approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 7. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Ann T. Musso Secretary to Burlingame Financing Authority Burlingame Financing Authority 1 June 18,2001 Unapproved Minutes BURLINGAME uui UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA July 9, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Conference Room A. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Joe Galligan. 2. ROLL CALL Council Present: GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI Council Absent: COFFEY 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS No one requested to speak. 4. CLOSED SESSION The Council then went into closed session to discuss City of Burlingame vs. Gladysz, San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 412328. The Council instructed the City Attorney with regard to further prosecution of the matter. 5. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:08 p.m. Ann T. Musso City Clerk Burlingame City Council Special Meeting 1 July 9,2001 Unapproved Minutes STAFF REPORT deni BURLINGAME BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA ITEM# 6 a L 1.......:. MTG. • DATE 7-16-01 TO: CHAIR AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS SBUBMITIED P / _ Add Ij,►� DATE: July 3, 2001 / APPRO I)�,j/ FROM: Rahn Becker, Finance Director BY J, ,4 suBJEcr: Resolution Authorizing Deposit of Bond Proceeds with State Local agency Investment Fund RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution. BACKGROUND: When the bond proceeds are received, the construction fund needs to be placed in a liquid account to insure that funds are available to meet progress payments and other expenses. The State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) offers a special account for bond proceeds that the city has historically used for this purpose. The yield in LAIF averages about the same as a two-year treasury bill, so it tends to be the best place to invest construction fund proceeds. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION OF THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEPOSIT OF BOND PROCEEDS WITH STATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND RESOLVED, by the Governing Board of the Burlingame Financing Authority: WHEREAS, the Authority is preparing to issue bonds in order to finance the construction of a corporation yard for the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the proceeds from this bond issue should be invested so that the proceeds will accrue interest to the benefit of the public; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 16429.1 creates a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the deposit and withdrawal of proceeds from the State Local Agency Investment Fund of the proceeds from the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, is in the best interests of the Financing Authority and the bondholders, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The deposit and withdrawal of Authority proceeds in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429.1 for the purpose of investment as stated in this resolution, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information provided in that regard is hereby authorized. 2. The following Authority officers or their successors in office are hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of proceeds in the State Local Agency Investment Fund: RAHN BECKER LINDA FREITAS SHARI JACKSON Finance Director Deputy Treasurer Assistant Deputy Treasurer /ell 3. These authorizations and designations shall be in effect until the Authority notifies the Local Agency Investment Fund in writing of any changes. CHAIR 1 I,ANN T.MUSSO,Secretary of the Burlingame Financing Authority,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Governing Board of the Burlingame Financing Authority held on the day of 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: SECRETARY D:\W P51\FILES\FinancingAuthority\investment.res.wpd 2 RESOLUTION OF THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-2001 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEPOSIT OF BOND PROCEEDS WITH STATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND RESOLVED, by the Governing Board of the Burlingame Financing Authority: WHEREAS, the Authority is preparing to issue bonds in order to finance the construction of a corporation yard for the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the proceeds from this bond issue should be invested so that the proceeds will accrue interest to the benefit of the public; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 16429.1 creates a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the deposit and withdrawal of proceeds from the State Local Agency Investment Fund of the proceeds from the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, is in the best interests of the Financing Authority and the bondholders, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The deposit and withdrawal of Authority proceeds in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429.1 for the purpose of investment as stated in this resolution, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information provided in that regard is hereby authorized. 2. The following Authority officers or their successors in office are hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of proceeds in the State Local Agency Investment Fund: RAHN BECKER LINDA FREITAS SHARI JACKSON Finance DiiirectorDeputy Treasurer/ r asurree/r s Assistant Deputy Treasurer — i ell _____ ..._____7,Z2 ":" 3. These authorizations and designations shall be in effect until the Authority notifies the Local Agency Investment Fund in writing of any changes. HAIR 1 s I,ANN T.MUSSO,Secretary of the Burlingame Financing Authority,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Governing Board of the Burlingame Financing Authority held on the 16TH day of JULY , 2001. and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE SECRETARY D:\W P51\FILES\FinancingAuthority\investment.res.wpd 2 ITY ' BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLINGAME REGULAR MEETING- MONDAY,JULY 16, 2001 CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD _ l n oun PAGE 1 OF 3 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 (650)558-7200 SUGGESTED ACTION + CLOSED SESSION 6:15 p.m., Conference Room A a. Personnel Matter(Government Code § 54957): one matter b. Pending Litigation (Government Code § 54956.9(a)): City of Burlingame vs. Gladysz, San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 412328 c. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code § 54957.6: City Negotiators Jim Nantell, Bob Bell, and IEDA; Labor Organizations AFSCME Locals 2190 and 829, and BAMM Following Financing Authority 1. CALL TO ORDER Meeting at 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG (recite at Financing Authority meeting) 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 2, 2001; Special Meeting of July Approval 9,2001 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each a. Adopt ORDINANCE Establishing 2001/02 Water Rates Hearing/Action b. Adopt ORDINANCE Establishing 2001/02 Sewer Rates Hearing/Action c. Adopt ORDINANCE to Install a Stop Sign on Trousdale Drive at Hearing/Action Quesada Way 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Update by Superintendent Tom Mohr to Council/Community on Information/Presentation Programs of the San Mateo Union High School District b. Discussion of Possible Ballot Measures Regarding (1) Continuing Discussion the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax Rate; (2) Continuing the general Business License Tax at$100 per Year; and(3) Establishing a Commercial Parking Tax at the Rate of 5% of Gross Revenue 8. CONSENT CALENDAR-Items on the Consent Calendar are acted on Approve simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action are requested by a council member. ci v 4 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLINGAME REGULAR MEETING- MONDAY,JULY 16, 2001 CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD 71[t ,01010 \ _ PAGE 2 OF 3 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 (650)558-7200 a. RESOLUTION Approving Labor Agreement with AFSCME Locals 829 and 2190 b. RESOLUTION Approving Labor Agreement with BAMM c. RESOLUTION Authorizing Transfer of Funds from Contingency Reserve for Additional Position in Human Resources Department d. RESOLUTION Approving Agreement for EMS Clinical Education Specialist e. RESOLUTION Approving Transfer of Funds from Police Budget to Police Furniture Ergonomic Upgrade Project f. RESOLUTION Revising Procedures for Settlement and Payment of Self-Insurance Claims g. RESOLUTION Approving Agreement for Development of a Synthetic Grass Field at the Burlingame High School Football Stadium h. RESOLUTION Awarding Contract for Burlingame Corporation Yard Reconstruction- CP 9601 i. RESOLUTION (1)Authorizing Examination of Sales and Use Tax Record by Designated Employees, and RESOLUTION (2) Authoring Examination of Sales and Use Tax Records by Designated Sales Tax Consultant j. Information Report regarding Bond Sizing and Calendar of Activity for Bids and Closing of Bond Issue - Corp. Yard Reconstruction k. Consent to Representation by San Mateo County Counsel in San Francisco Baykeeper vs. California State Water Resources Control Board, San Mateo County Superior Court Case No. 416800 1. Special Encroachment Permit for a Wooden Fence within the City's Right-of-Way at 2901 Arguello Drive m. Direction for Voting at July 20, 2001, Cities Selection Committee and Council of Cities Meeting 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Planning, July 9, 2001 b. Department Reports: Building, June 2001 ✓ • ITY V' BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLINGAME to REGULAR MEETING-MONDAY,JULY 16, 2001 CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD = .n diieodn PAGE 3 OF 3 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 (650)558-7200 c. Required Review for Compliance with the Conditional Use Permit for the Interfaith Hospitality Network at Three Churches in Burlingame d. Letter from Ruth Jacobs, 2965 Arguello Drive, regarding potential fire hazard in Mills Canyon area, and response from Fire Chief e. Letter from Dan Lopez, 1116-A Chula Vista Avenue, regarding leaf blower nuisance f. Letter from Acting Parks &Recreation Director responding to Eric Mendell's June 21, 2001, letter regarding proposal to install synthetic turf at Burlingame High School's football field. g. Letter from residents of Drake and Sanchez Avenues regarding neighborhood safety concerns h. Letter of resignation from Civil Service Commissioner Keith Kutner i. Letter from Bay Area Quality Management District regarding Air District proposals to regulate wood smoke 13. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558- 7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. Meetings are shown live on AT&T Cable Channel 27 at 7:00 p.m. NEXT MEETING—July 23, 2001 N BURLINGAME 1H.r[o Jure b•�, UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA July 2, 2001 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Joe Galligan. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Rahn Becker. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI Council Absent: None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 18, 2001, Regular Council Meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of a Design Review, Side Setback Variance, Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope and Hillside Area Construction Permit for an addition to the Single Family House at 1524 Los Montes Avenue, Zoned R-1 CP Monroe noted the applicant for 1524 Los Montes is proposing a first and second story addition to the existing two story house with attached garage at 1524 Los Montes Drive, zoned R-1. This property slopes approximately 27 feet from front to rear property line. The addition would increase the floor area ratio from .24 FAR(2,883 SF) to .33 FAR(3,907 SF); the maximum FAR allowed on this lot is .41 (4,861 SF). With the proposed design, the existing attached garage would be retained with interior dimensions of 19 feet in width and 20 feet in length. The following exceptions are requested for this project: design review of a first and second story addition, hillside area construction permit for view blockage, side setback variance for 1'-10"on the right side of the lower floor(5'-2"proposed where 7'- 0" is the minimum setback required), and a special permit for declining height envelope on the second floor along the right side of the house (17 SF, 2'-0"x 8'x 6"). The Planning Commission received a letter from a neighbor who expressed concern about the impact on the view at the rear of his house from the extension of this house to the rear. The applicant provided pictures documenting that other houses between his and the nearby owner's extended further toward the Burlingame City Council 1 July 2,2001 Unapproved Minutes rear than was proposed by this project. The commission expressed concern both at study and action about what the unique characteristics or hardships were on this lot to justify the side setback variance. In the end, although all the commissioners agreed that the architectural style of the house was consistent and compatible with the existing neighborhood, the variance finding issue was not addressed adequately for some of the commissioners. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. Michael Berman, property owner of 1524 Los Montes thanked the Council for visiting the project site. Mr. Berman noted the property has not been renovated since the initial construction; the variance requested affects the south side of the home where they would like to add an additional bathroom. He submitted a list of findings for the variances. Requested Council grant the variance for a side setback so they could proceed with construction. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Spinelli noted he visited the site and noted that no views were affected, that this house and others on the block were built with 5" side setbacks, that the proposed extension of the building in the setback would not be visible from the street, that the extension at the wall was consistent with the architecture of the house and within the utility of the interior of the house, and this site is not overbuilt with this proposal, 1500 SF of FAR is unused. Vice Mayor Spinelli made a motion to overturn the Planning Commission's denial of a design review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit for an addition to the single family house at 1524 Los Montes Avenue; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. Consider possible Ballot Proposals for the November 2001 Election Regarding (1) Continuing the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax Rate; (2) Continuing the General Business License Tax at $100 per year; and (3) Establishing a Commercial Parking Tax at the Rate of 5% of Gross Revenues Mayor Galligan noted he would not be participating in the discussion of the commercial parking tax due to his ownership in a similar business in a different city. c...)..ct-Vc. CA Anderson noted on June 4 the California Supreme Court decided a case concerning Proposition 62; this Proposition was adopted by the voters of California in 1986 and was litigated for a number of years. In 1991 a series of appellate court decisions decided that Proposition 62,which required all taxes go to the voters before being imposed, was unconstitutional. In reliance on that decision, the Burlingame City Council decided to adopt an increase in the transient occupancy tax from 8%to 10%, which was consistent at that time with what most of the cities on the Peninsula were imposing. In 1992, the City of Burlingame adopted a business license tax revision, which increased business license taxes from $50 to $75, and then to $100, and also imposed some additional business license taxes. However, Proposition 62 did not die in 1991. Instead it came back in two forms; one is Proposition 218 which was a correction made by the Howard Jarvis Association to address the defects that the appellate court had seen in Proposition 62. Concurrently, the California Supreme Court was presented with a case where they affirmed Proposition 62 and said it did apply to cities; the question then became at what point did it apply. For the past six years, cities and the Howard Jarvis Association have litigated this issue. Most cities assumed that the statute of limitations was probably three years from either the adoption of Proposition 218 or from the decision that affirmed Proposition 62. However, the California Supreme Court decided this was not the case and adopted neither the opinion of the Howard Jarvis Association nor the opinion of the League of California Cities and decided there is no statute of limitations and that a tax, no matter how old, that is subject to Proposition 62 can be challenged as long as it is still being collected by a city. That puts at risk the two ordinances that were adopted by Burlingame in 1991 and July 2,2001 2 Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes 1992. There are other cases pending regarding Proposition 62; charter cities are taking the position that it does not apply to them, but has not been decided. There are more legal arguments that can be made that would make it inapplicable to certain taxes based on Proposition 218's passage. Staff believes, however, this puts a significant amount of the City's general fund at risk; recommends placing the business license tax and transient occupancy tax increase on the ballot in November before the voters of Burlingame. It would address the issues presented by the California Supreme Court and the City would not have to wait to find out if our taxes are going to be invalidated by another court opinion. The transient occupancy tax was increased from 8% to 10% in 1991 and generates from $2.4 to $2.8 million per year; this increase has gone to finance much of what has been improved at the bay side in the last ten years. The recommendation from staff is a ballot measure be placed on the ballot to validate the 2% increase and keep the transient occupancy tax at 10%. The second issue is the business license tax; an increase of$50 to $100. This tax generates approximately$400,000 per year and is basically equal to or less than most business license taxes in the surrounding area. Recommend placing this ballot measure before the voters in November to keep the business license tax rate at $100 per year. Regarding the third issue, in 1992 a new tax was adopted that placed a gross receipts tax of 5% on airport parking facilities located in the City, which generates approximately$260,000 per year and applies to just a few operations in town. Staff is concerned about this because of the nature of way it is imposed; it is imposed not only on a parking facility, but a parking facility that serves the airport and may give rise to some legal fallibilities within the ordinance. Because of that, staff is recommending that we redraft that ordinance so it applies to businesses that constitute a commercial parking business. It would not apply necessarily to a business that offers paid parking as part of the business; it would have to be a predominate part of the business. For example, there can be a commercial parking facility where a certain amount is charged per day; the business can also offer detailing or other amenities but the business itself would really be a parking business. If it is shaped that way, it would not apply to a valet parking operation in a restaurant or a hotel that charges for parking. The fourth issue is that there are a number of minor changes in the business license tax imposed in 1992; staff recommends those revert to the 1992 rates and not be put on the ballot as they are extensive and confusing and some are out of date. Finally, staff recommends that Council consider how to shape a ballot measure; in order to pass a ballot measure it is important to make it clear to the voters exactly what they are voting on. Recommend that there be at least two different measures, one for the transient occupancy tax so it's clear that that applies to a certain business, and secondly, a measure concerning business license taxes that might or might not include the commercial parking enterprises. CA Anderson noted this is the first of the two public hearings that have been scheduled; the second public hearing is scheduled for July 23 at 9:00 a.m. Also recommend this be brought back to the July 16 Council meeting for additional discussion. The decision to have two or three measures on the ballot can be made as late as July 23. If given direction, staff will return on July 16 with draft proposals for Council's review. Council comments: Have had many changes in the hotel usage of the lots that are required for the number of rooms, should be addressed. Staff recommended this is Council's decision, but recommended not to include the hotels in the parking tax. The City of Burlingame does not tax business Burlingame City Council 3 July 2,2001 Unapproved Minutes on the basis of parkin gross receipts, unlike g tax together is that the b most cities on the makes more sense to usiness Peninsula. The occupancySeparate those o Pays $100 and Borne problem with tax. A department store such A hotel is Part of the business putting a hotel and Burlingame as Aberc S gen tax in a• ndpays on gross receipts; $100 business tax fee. a commercial mbie and Fitch is of itself from the transient Parkin generatin ansient g facility pays no taxes to the Cit ales tax on Mayor Galligan y other than the closed. opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the heari Council membeng was rs stated they felt the transient occu a significant and important part of the City's revenue and of p ncy tax should ss a separate ballot measure; •itis a and could get confused combined with one of the other issues. all of the issues, the •simplest to comprehend forward on drafting the ballot measures. Council gave staff direction to move c. Ado'tion of ORDINANCE 1657 Amendin, the Munici al Code to Re uirements to Govern ment Code Section 935 and Munici,al Co a Section onforClaim 4.14.010. CA Anderson explained that in reviewing the claims filing requirements of the City, there is some confusion among Municipal Code sections. Chapter 4.15 provides a straight-forward, one-year requirement for claims that are not otherwise governed by the State Tort Claims Act. However, two other sections contain variations. It is recommended that the claims requirement process be clarified, and all claims not governed by the Tort Claims Act required to be filed no later than one year following accrual of the claim. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman Janney made a motion to adopt the ORDINANCE 1657 amending the Municipal Code to conform Claim Requirements to Government Code Section 935 and Municipal Code Section 4.14.010; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. A summary of the notice will be published by the City Clerk. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Don Corey, 833 Alpine, concerned about the eucalyptus windbreak along the train tracks between Oak Grove and Broadway. Bernie Borok, 1475 Lincoln, would like Council to review the situation regarding leaf blower noise. Dan Anderson, 728 Vernon Way,would like better communication between the City and the citizens of Burlingame who do not read newspapers,watch cable TV or use the Internet. There were no further comments and the public comment period was closed. to Mr. Anderson's comments that Council has increased City Manager Nantell stated in response resources in the newly adopted budget in an effort to take proactive steps to inform the citizens of ducting citizen surveys as well as sending out an annual report Burlingame. In the fall, staff will be con to help the community understand what has been accomplished and the issues the City is looking at the unity involved; it is a frustration at times to do the coming year. It is a challenge to get the comm et the attention of the community, such as the Housing amount of publicity we do and not be able to g ized in which only four citizens attended. Council's support Element Workshop that was widely public 4 Burlingame City Council July 2,2001 Unapproved Minutes of additional resources in the Clerk's office as well as the resources to do more civic engagement is a step in the right direction. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Introduction of Ordinance Establishing 2001/02 Water Rates Assistant City Manager Becker noted water rates are reviewed annually following preparation of the proposed budget. The proposed consumption rate increase of 3 .7% is caused by an estimated 5.0% increase in the cost of water purchased from the San Francisco Water Department, and the need to continue funding the five-year capital improvement program for the water system. The recommended transfer from the water fund for capital improvements is $550,000, up from $450,000 in 2000-01 ; noted at the May 17 Council meeting, DPW Bagdon presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan showed total estimated capital improvement needs for the water enterprise of $23 to $50 million. Over the next five years, the city is expected to spend $7 million on water projects, and does not include the anticipated improvements needed for the entire Hetch Hetchy system. The present capacity for capital funding at current rates is only $550,000. A comprehensive financial plan for these capital improvements will be done this coming year. A component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the water rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. The water fund currently carries a $ 1 million loan from the general fund. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Janney made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance, seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso publish a summary of the proposed Ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b. Introduction of Ordinance Establishing 2001/02 Sanitary Sewer Rates Assistant City Manager Becker noted that the Federal Environmental Protection Agency regulations require that operation and maintenance costs for the city's sewer enterprise be paid from the sewer rate with a specific method for calculating the rate based on flow and loading. For the determination of the rate, the revenue required was reduced by the estimated amount to be received from Burlingame Hills and Hillsborough. Their respective flows and loadings were removed from the program. The primary reason for the rate increase is to continue accumulation of funding for the capital improvement program for the sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant; noted at the May 17 Council meeting, DPW Bagdon presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan showed total estimated capital improvement needs for the sewer enterprise of $25 to $50 million. A comprehensive financial plan for these capital improvements will be done this coming year. A component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the sewer rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Janney made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance, seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso publish a summary of the proposed Ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. Burlingame City Council 5 July 2, 2001 Unapproved Minutes c. Introduction of Ordinance for Installation of a Stop Sign at the Intersection of Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way DPW Bagdon noted the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered a petition circulated by residents. One issue raised as a result of the petition was the need to add stop signs for access to Trousdale Drive from side streets. Based on this concern, staff developed traffic counts and speed information for various areas, including the intersection of Quesada Way and Trousdale Drive. Staff recommended that the stop sign be considered by the TSPC as it met the traffic volume warrant. Although there is a low traffic accident history and there would be increased braking noise and gas use, staff believes that the benefits of a stop sign outweigh these concerns. The stop sign would provide a more controlled flow during peak traffic periods, especially for eastbound traffic which backs up as many as ten vehicles in each lane. Also, the stop sign would better facilitate pedestrian crossings. Therefore, staff supports the Commission recommendation. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Janney made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance, seconded by Vice Mayor Spinelli, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Galligan requested City Clerk Musso publish a summary of the proposed Ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approve RESOLUTION#73-2001 Authorizing Agreement with Hilton Farnkopf and Hobson to Study and make Recommendations in Connection with Solid Waste Collection Rates ACM Becker recommended approval of RESOLUTION#73-2001 authorizing the agreement with Hilton Farnkopt and Hobson. b. Approve RESOLUTION #74-2001 Ratifying Agreement with San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau for Performance of Services and Activities of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District and Approve Form Agreement with Participating Cities CA Anderson recommended Council adopt RESOLUTION#74-2001 to ratify agreement with San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau to provide the services and activities required by the San Mateo Tourism BID, and approve form agreement with participating cities. c. Review and Renewal of Amusement Permit for Fanny & Alexander, 1108 Burlingame Avenue and 303-305 California Drive CA Anderson recommended Council review the existing permit for Fanny&Alexander and renew the permit for six (6)months because the establishment is still evolving and has just recently opened its addition along California Drive. d. Special Encroachment Permit for a Wooden Picket Fence at the Back of the Sidewalk at 833 Alpine Avenue July 2,2001 6 Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve the special encroachment permit for a wooden picket fence in accordance with the drawings, permit and conditions noted in the staff report. e. Special Encroachment Permit for a Garage Wall that Extends 3-3/4" into the Public Sewer Easement at 1420 Bernal Avenue DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve the special encroachment permit for a garage wall which encroaches 3-3/4"into the rear sewer easement in accordance with the drawings,permit and conditions noted in the staff report. f. Appointment of Peter Martindale and Mary Warden to the Parks & Recreation Commission as Youth Commissioners Acting Parks &Recreation Director Randy Schwartz recommended Council appoint Peter Martindale and Mary Warden to the Parks &Recreation Commission as Youth Commissioners for the 2001/02 year. Councilwoman Janney made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Coucilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 04") Councilwoman O'Mahony attended the celebratMhonoring Joseph and Victoria Cthett, the Housing Element Workshop, the Celebration of Life Memorial of Marianne Riddle, the Memorial of Eleanor Nettle, a trustee of the Community College District for 33 years, and the committee meeting regarding the ballot measure for November. Councilman Coffey attended Commerce and Coffee, Mike Nevin for Assembly candidate breakfast, Leadership for San Mateo Council, participated in the Maiden of the Morns, Council of Cities meeting,participated in San Mateo's Wine Walk,the OLA Men's Club meeting, and the Housing Element Workshop. Vice Mayor Spinelli attended the Housing Element Workshop and the Council of Cities meeting and Wine Walk in San Mateo. Councilwoman Janney attended the Coffee and Commerce meeting and attempted to attend a scheduled meeting with hotel representatives and the Mayor, which did not occur. Mayor Galligan attended Commerce and Coffee, also attempted to attend the same scheduled meeting as Councilwoman Janney with the hotel representatives, IHN Child Cer;ter Opening at 1720 El Camino Real, Leadership Graduation, celebration honoring Joe and Victoria C hett, Police/Fire/Recreation Night, 75th Anniversary for First Presbyterian Church, OLA Men's Club meeting, and met with staff regarding the proposed ballot measure. 10. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 11. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Janney suggested the meeting be adjourned in Marianne Riddle and Eleanor Nettle's memory. 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Burlingame City Council 7 July 2,2001 Unapproved Minutes a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees, May 22, 2001; Beautification,June 7, 2001; Traffic, Safety and Parking, June 14, 2001; Parks &Recreation, June 21, 2001; Planning, June 25, 2001 b. Letter from Eric G. Mendell, 235 Park Road, regarding the Council's commitment to finance artificial turf at Burlingame High School c. Letter from Mary Stair regarding excessive noise due to leaf blowers d. Letter from Lee Breult, 125 Barkentine, Foster City, e. Letter from Gerald Arrigoni, Burlingame High School, accepting the offer for artificial turf and thanking Council for their help Council adjourned to closed at 8:05 p.m. 13. CLOSED SESSION 4irr CA Anderson noted Council met in closed session to discuss three matters; a claim by CS2A regarding a motor vehicle accident. Council instructed CA Anderson with regards to a possible settlement. The second matter concerned a personnel matter which is confidential between the City Manager and the Council. Third, the Council discussed the pending litigation with regard to Judy Gladys, which is now before the San Mateo Superior Court and instructed the City Attorney and the Civil Attorney representing the City, Charles Dyer, regarding the pursuit of that case in the trial court. 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 9:06 p.m. in memory of Marianne Riddle, Eleanor Nettle and Eleanor Armstrong, a former Deputy City Clerk for the City of Burlingame. Ann T. Musso City Clerk July 2,2001 8 Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes STAFF REPORT BmtiGAME AGENDA ITEM# 5 a MTG. qoa' .e,i ' o;' DATE 7-16-01 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SOBMTTTEIy r -- DATE: July 3,2001 APPROVED 17/ FROM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/Admin. BY 1:41 Services Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance,2001-02 Water Rates RECOMMENDATION: A. Adopt proposed ordinance. B. Direct city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: Water rates are reviewed annually following preparation of the Proposed Budget. The proposed consumption rate increase from$2.45/1,000 gallons to $2.54/1,000 gallons(3.7%) and a$1.89 increase(31.5%) in the monthly service charge are caused by a 3.7% increase in the cost of water purchased from the San Francisco Water Department, and the need to continue funding the five-year capital improvement program for the water system. The recommended transfer from the water fund for capital improvements is $550,000, up from $450,000 in 2000-01. On May 17,the public works director presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan outlined total estimated capital improvements needs for the Water enterprise of $23 to $50 million. Over the next five years,the city is expected to spend $7 million on water projects. This does not include the anticipated improvements needed for the entire Hetch Hetchy system, a portion of which will be paid by Burlingame and other suburban users contracting with the City of San Francisco. The present capacity for capital funding at current rates is only$550,000. During the coming year, the city's financial advisor, Kelling Northcross&Nobriga, will begin on a comprehensive financial plan for this capital improvements program. As staff mentioned at the May 17 Council study session, a component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the water rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. The water fund currently carries a$1 million dollar loan from the general fund. The $1.89 per month increase in the base monthly service charge for a typical residential water meter is to cover increases in fixed system costs, and to continue a multi-year program to increase the base service charge. This will reduce the impact of changes in consumption patterns due to abnormal weather years, and provide a more predictable financing for the capital improvements program. The combined affect of these adjustments is a change in the average residential bill of 10.2%for the coming year. For 2001-02, the rate per 1,000 gallons of water consumed will increase from$2.76 to $2.89 (4.7%) for Burlingame Hills. Larger residential, multifamily and commercial accounts are proposed to also receive 31.5% increases in the base service charge. Because of the Proposition 218 requirement that all property owners be notified of the impact of the rate increase 45 days before the public hearing, water use was estimated for May and June to develop this recommendation. Notices were also sent to tenants who pay their own utility bills. Conservative estimates were used showing no increase in water use over 2000-01. As consumption patterns appear to be stable, it would be unwise to project any increases in water use for next year. The attachments include comparative rates which show that Burlingame continues to enjoy rates lower than surrounding jurisdictions. BUDGET IMPACT: If approved as presented, the rates plus miscellaneous revenue will produce financing to cover all budgeted operating costs, excluding depreciation. In addition, the rates will cover a transfer to the water capital improvements program of$550,000 and a transfer to the general fund covering administrative costs of$50,000. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Comparative Graphs CC: George Bagdon, Public Works Director Chris Rogers, Billing and Collections Supervisor City of Burlingame Water Consumption By Fiscal Year 2,000 1,800 1,600iiiiiiii—i — 1,400 —.mai MI EMI N1,200 2 O g 1,000 N c O 800 - c) 600 400 200 • 0 00N* 00�0^3 00na' 00V 004S' 000'cgb cb 00A, 00000 00000 0000 N City of Burlingame Water Use by Billing Period 1998-2001 400,000,000 - NMI 1998 350,000,000 ------ libr-1111 1999 0 2000 NEI 2001 300,000,000 -- —, -x--15% Rationing 250,000,000 —.- N � - 200,000,000 — - 150,000,000 -- 100,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 -- I 0 I - - , - - - - - - February 28 April 30 June 30 August 31 October 31 December 31 Two Months Ending 1 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING 2001 REVISIONS TO RATES AND FEES FOR WATER SERVICE 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 Section 1. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No. 6 • 1630 adopted July 5, 2000. Notice of proposed revisions to the water rates and connection fees 7 and of the public hearing on the rates and fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and 8 duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public 9 hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the price of water to consumers 10 supplied through the city's distributing system must be increased to balance increased costs and 11 that certain fees must also be increased to balance increased costs to the city. These rates and fees 12 will provide support to the immense needs for reconstruction of the water system. In 13 construction and maintenance of the City water system, the City general fund has contributed 14 significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and operate the water system. The rates and fees 15 adopted in this ordinance are not discriminatory or excessive. 16 17 Section 2. 18 (a) Effective for all meter readings on and after September 1, 2001, the fixed monthly 19 charge based on meter size shall be as follows, and for residential services only, such service 20 charge shall include the first 1,000 gallons of water per month: 21 MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE 22 5/8" and 3/4" meters $ 7.89 23 1" meters 13.18 24 1-1/2" meters 21.07 25 2" meters 31.57 26 3" meters 55.24 27 4" meters 78.91 28 6" meters 131.55 1 8" meters 210.46 2 (b) Effective for all meter readings on and after September 1, 2001, the rate for water 3 consumed within the city shall be $2.54 per thousand gallons and for water consumed outside the 4 city shall be $2.89 per thousand gallons. The normal turn-on fee schedule for new accounts shall 5 be Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m., no charge; 3:16 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., $20; 3:31 6 p.m. to 7:59 a.m., $60; Saturday/Sunday/holidays, $60. 7 (c) Payment of all charges for water furnished by the municipal water department of the 8 city must be made forthwith, and, if not paid within thirty (30)days after the date on which billed, 9 shall be assessed a 1-1/2% penalty charge. In addition, the service may be discontinued and will 10 not be renewed unless a fee for renewal service and all outstanding bills are paid. The fee for 11 renewal shall be for service Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m., 12 $35; from 3:16 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., $45; and from 3:31 p.m. to 4:50 p.m., $60. After 4:50 p.m., 13 service will not be renewed until the next working day. 14 (d) In the event of an underground leak on the customer's service which cannot be easily 15 detected or a similar occurrence, the public works director or the finance director may adjust the 16 resulting water charges if they deem an adjustment is warranted. If an adjustment is made, the 17 resulting charge shall not be less than the amount paid for the purchase of the water lost due to 18 the leak. 19 (e) Fire service charge for maintaining water in a fire protection system shall be $1 per 20 month per inch of pipe diameter for the service connection, with a$2 per month minimum charge. 21 Water delivered at a fire service shall be charged at the regular rates for domestic service, except 22 that there shall be no charge for water used in a fire call emergency 23 (f) When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city 24 according to the size of the service as follows: 25 5/8" through 1" $25 26 1'1/2" and 2" $40 27 Over 2" $50 minimum 28 In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the - 2 - 1 testing fee and make adjustments in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar 2 months preceding the date of the request for a test. 3 In the event the meter was recording accurately. the fee shall be retained. On services 4 over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent 5 (15%) for overhead should exceed the $50 fee. 6 (g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval of 7 the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative, upon deposit of$750. 8 Service charges shall be at the per gallon rates for domestic service with a minimum charge of$15 9 per month. 10 (h) Deposits for turn-on of water service. 11 (1) Deposits will be required for the turn-on of water service for any customer whose 12 account with the city has had a delinquency on a city water account during the previous twelve(12) 13 months in an amount equal to two (2) months estimated consumption, or $50.00, whichever is 14 greater. If no further delinquencies occur on the account over the succeeding twelve-month period, 15 the deposit shall be applied as a credit to the account. 16 (2) If a delinquency occurs on an account to which a deposit has been made, the 17 delinquency shall be satisfied first from the amount on deposit. 18 (1) Any work done on the water system of city shall have prior approval and permit from 19 city engineer. A fee of$60 shall be charged for the permit. A bond or deposit of$1,500 shall 20 accompany the request for a permit. The deposit is refundable in full upon completion of the 21 work to the satisfaction of the city engineer or water department superintendent. 22 (j) All domestic water service installations of sizes 5/8" to 2", inclusive, consisting of 23 corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and installed 24 by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line, or to a 25 point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or other 26 right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main 27 connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees: 28 5/8" bypass meter $ 325 - 3 - 1 5/8" service with meter 1,200 2 3/4" service with meter 1,275 3 1" service with meter 1.300 4 1-1/2" service with meter 2.500 5 2" service with meter 2,750 6 All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer 7 than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and 8 installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%) 9 of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum 10 to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such 11 sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the 12 event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said 13 installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be 14 charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the 15 excess shall be refunded. 16 Section 3. Ordinance Nos. 1630 and 1646 are hereby superseded. 17 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 18 19 Mayor 20 21 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of 22 July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day 23 of , 2001, by the following vote: 24 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 25 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 26 27 City Clerk 28 D:\WP5I\FILES\Water\2001 rates.pwd.wpd - 4 - • 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1660 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING 2001 REVISIONS TO RATES AND FEES FOR WATER SERVICE 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 Section 1. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No. 6 1630 adopted July 5, 2000. Notice of proposed revisions to the water rates and connection fees 7 and of the public hearing on the rates and fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and 8 duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public 9 hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the price of water to consumers 10 supplied through the city's distributing system must be increased to balance increased costs and 11 that certain fees must also be increased to balance increased costs to the city. These rates and fees 12 will provide support to the immense needs for reconstruction of the water system. In 13 construction and maintenance of the City water system, the City general fund has contributed 14 significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and operate the water system. The rates and fees 15 adopted in this ordinance are not discriminatory or excessive. 16 17 Section 2. 18 (a) Effective for all meter readings on and after September 1, 2001, the fixed monthly 19 charge based on meter size shall be as follows, and for residential services only, such service 20 charge shall include the first 1,000 gallons of water per month: 21 MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE 22 5/8" and 3/4" meters $ 7.89 23 1" meters 13.18 • 24 1-1/2" meters 21.07 25 2" meters 31.57 26 3" meters 55.24 27 4" meters 78.91 28 6" meters 131.55 1 8" meters 210.46 2 (b) Effective for all meter readings on and after September 1, 2001, the rate for water 3 consumed within the city shall be $2.54 per thousand gallons and for water consumed outside the 4 city shall be $2.89 per thousand gallons. The normal turn-on fee schedule for new accounts shall 5 be Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m., no charge; 3:16 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., $20; 3:31 6 p.m. to 7:59 a.m., $60; Saturday/Sunday/holidays, $60. 7 (c) Payment of all charges for water furnished by the municipal water department of the 8 city must be made forthwith, and, if not paid within thirty (30)days after the date on which billed, 9 shall be assessed a 1-1/2% penalty charge. In addition, the service may be discontinued and will 10 not be renewed unless a fee for renewal service and all outstanding bills are paid. The fee for 11 renewal shall be for service Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m., 12 $35; from 3:16 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., $45; and from 3:31 p.m. to 4:50 p.m., $60. After 4:50 p.m., 13 service will not be renewed until the next working day. 14 (d) In the event of an underground leak on the customer's service which cannot be easily 15 detected or a similar occurrence, the public works director or the finance director may adjust the 16 resulting water charges if they deem an adjustment is warranted. If an adjustment is made, the 17 resulting charge shall not be less than the amount paid for the purchase of the water lost due to 18 the leak. 19 (e) Fire service charge for maintaining water in a fire protection system shall be $1 per 20 month per inch of pipe diameter for the service connection, with a$2 per month minimum charge. 21 Water delivered at a fire service shall be charged at the regular rates for domestic service, except 22 that there shall be no charge for water used in a fire call emergency 23 (f) When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city 24 according to the size of the service as follows: 25 5/8" through 1" $25 26 1'1/2" and 2" $40 27 Over 2" $50 minimum 28 In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the - 2 - 1 testing fee and make adjustments in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar 2 months preceding the date of the request for a test. 3 In the event the meter was recording accurately, the fee shall be retained. On services 4 over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent 5 (15%) for overhead should exceed the $50 fee. 6 (g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval of 7 the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative,upon deposit of$750. 8 Service charges shall be at the per gallon rates for domestic service with a minimum charge of$15 9 per month. 10 (h) Deposits for turn-on of water service. 11 (1) Deposits will be required for the turn-on of water service for any customer whose 12 account with the city has had a delinquency on a city water account during the previous twelve(12) 13 months in an amount equal to two (2) months estimated consumption, or $50.00, whichever is 14 greater. If no further delinquencies occur on the account over the succeeding twelve-month period, 15 the deposit shall be applied as a credit to the account. 16 (2) If a delinquency occurs on an account to which a deposit has been made, the 17 delinquency shall be satisfied first from the amount on deposit. 18 (i) Any work done on the water system of city shall have prior approval and permit from 19 city engineer. A fee of$60 shall be charged for the permit. A bond or deposit of$1,500 shall 20 accompany the request for a permit. The deposit is refundable in full upon completion of the 21 work to the satisfaction of the city engineer or water department superintendent. 22 (j) All domestic water service installations of sizes 5/8" to 2", inclusive, consisting of 23 corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and installed 24 by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line, or to a 25 point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or other 26 right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main 27 connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees: 28 5/8" bypass meter $ 325 - 3 - 1 5/8" service with meter 1,200 2 3/4" service with meter 1,275 3 1" service with meter 1,300 4 1-1/2" service with meter 2,500 5 2" service with meter 2,750 6 All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2")or longer 7 than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and 8 installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%) 9 of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum 10 to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such 11 sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the 12 event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said 13 installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be 14 charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the 15 excess shall be refunded. 16 Section 3. Ordinance Nos. 1630 and 1646 are hereby superseded. 17 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 18 19 Q� 20 a'`" 21 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of 22 July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16TH day 23 of JULY , 2001, by the following vote: 24 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 25 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JANNEY 26 27 City Clerk 28 D:\WP5I\FILES\Water\2001 rates.pwd.wpd - 4 - STAFF REPORT BV ypi9mE AGENDA --� ITEM# 5 b MTG. NATO)JUNE°. DATE 7-16-01 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT BY ,4011I DATE: July 3, 2001 APPROVED FROM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/Admin. Services Director BY )111.4 l Xla summer: Adoption of Ordinance,2001-02 Sewer Rates RECOMMENDATION: A. Adopt proposed ordinance. B. Direct city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: Federal Environmental Protection Agency regulations require that operation and maintenance costs for the city's sewer enterprise be paid from the sewer rate with a specific method for calculating the rate based on flow and loading. For the determination of the rate, the revenue required was reduced by the estimated amount to be received from Burlingame Hills and Hillsborough. Their respective flows and loadings were removed from the program. The primary reason for the rate increase is to continue accumulation of funding for the capital improvements program for the sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant. On May 17, the public works director presented to Council the updated five-year capital improvements plan. The plan outlined total estimated capital improvements needs for the Sewer enterprise of $25 to $50 million. Over the next five years,the city is expected to spend $16 million on sewer projects. The present capacity for capital funding at current rates is about $1 million. During the coming year,the city's financial advisor, Kelling Northcross&Nobriga, will begin a comprehensive financial plan for this capital improvements program. As staff mentioned at the May 17 council study session, a component of this plan will probably be significant increases in the sewer rates over time plus a possible use of general fund reserves to assist this enterprise. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in June, 1996, requires that a notice be sent to all property owners regarding any changes in utility rates at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. This notice was prepared and mailed to all property owners as well as tenants who pay their utility bill. The current rates were effective last September 1. Proposed rates for single-family residential increase 9.8% to $3.03 per 1,000 gallons of winter water use. The rate will be applied to the three-year winter water use average to calculate a fixed rate that will remain in effect until next year's rate review. A given customer's actual increase may be greater or lesser than 9.8%, depending on their winter water consumption average use. Multifamily rates increase 8.7%to $3.75, and institutional rates increase 6.14%to $1.21. Since there are very few accounts in this category, water consumption changes can produce a large percentage change from year to year. Light commercial rates increase 16.76%to$6.27 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed. Moderate-Heavy commercial increase 8.96%to$7.78 and food-related commercial increases 5.34%to$9.86. Commercial cateeories will pay an estimated 60.1%of the total sewer service charees for 2001-02. BUDGET IMPACT:These rates,when established and combined with the estimated revenue from Hillsborough,Burlingame Hills,and miscellaneous revenue totaling$972,000,will raise revenue equal to the 2001-02 sewer operating budget less depreciation,plus$1,100,000 for capital improvements,$50,000 for administrative costs and$1,698,000 for debt service. CC: George Bagdon,Public Works Director Chris Rogers,Billing and Collections Supervisor ATTACHMENTS:Ordinance,Rate Comparisons Chart City of Burlingame Single Family Water and Sewer Rate Comparison (2 months) Rates as of May 21, 2001 Agency Water(1) Sewer(2) Total Burlingame -existing 61.98 34.78 96.76 -proposed 67.60 38.18 105.77 Belmont--possible 8% increase July or Jan. 87.21 49.72 136.93 Cal Water--San Carlos 72.01 46.04 118.05 Cal Water--San Mateo 72.01 40.60 112.61 Foster City 54.64 55.38 110.02 Hillsborough 7/1/01 Progressive Schedule 2.18/unit to 4.03/unit 75.28 131.00 206.28 Millbrae 7/1/01 76.59 53.11 129.70 San Bruno 81.00 58.07 139.07 Redwood City (Est. +3.5%, 7-1-01) Progressive rates from $0.86/100 Cu. Ft to $2.50/100 Cu. Ft. 56.70 37.94 94.64 AVERAGE (EXCL. BURLINGAME) 71.93 58.98 130.91 (1) Based on average monthly use of 11,200 gallons (2) Based on January - April three year average monthly use of 6,300 gallons. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08 3 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER COLLECTION RATES AND CHARGES 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1 . Notice of proposed revisions to the sewer rates and of the public hearing on 8 the proposed rates was mailed to each property owner in the City and to tenants paying utility 9 bills, and duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, 10 after public hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the price of sewer 11 service to customers must be increased to balance increased costs and improvements and to 12 fund necessary reconstruction. In construction and maintenance of the City sewer system, 13 the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and 14 operate the system. 15 16 Section 2. Section 15.08.070 of the Burlingame Municipal Code is hereby amended to 17 read as follows: 18 19 15.08.070 Sewer rental—Service charges. 20 Every person whose premises in the city are served by a connection with the system of 21 sewerage of the city, whereby the sewerage or industrial wastes, or either or both, are disposed 22 by the city, shall pay a bimonthly sewer charge based upon the quantity of metered water per 23 bimonthly billing period as set forth in the following rate schedule, whether such water is derived 24 from a source other than city water supply or all or part of such water is furnished to the premises 25 without charge. The director of public works shall determine the classification of uses not 26 specifically listed. The finance director shall have the discretion and authority to establish a 27 different sewer charge when circumstances such as water leaks or unseasonable or atypical water 28 1 usage cause established rates to result in inequitably low or high sewer charges; any such 2 determination shall be reviewed by the city manager upon request from the customer. 3 Classification Amount 4 (1) Single-family/duplex $3.03 per thousand gallons of average water consumption for the billing 5 periods January through April of the years 1999, 2000, and 2001. 6 (2) Multi-family residential $3.75 per thousand gallons of water 7 consumption for the current billing period. 8 (3) Restaurant, caterers, supermarkets, bakeries $9.86 per thousand gallons of water 9 and other commercial food processing and consumption for the current billing food-related commercial period. 10 11 (4) Moderate strength commercial, including $7.78 per thousand gallons of water manufacturing, commercial or industrial consumption for the current billing 12 laundries, hotels with restaurants and hospitals period. 13 (5) Light strength commercial including $6.27 per thousand gallons of water ofice-warehouse, office buildings, cocktail consumption for the current billing 14 lounges, auto-related, carwash, laundromats, period. convalescent homes and hotels without 15 restaurants 16 (6) Institutional (schools and churches) $1.21 per thousand gallons of water 17 consumption for the current billing period. 18 19 Section 3. The schedule of rates shall be effective for all billings on and after 20 September 1, 2001. 21 Section 4. The City Council finds that the rates adopted by this ordinance are not 22 discriminatory or excessive and are intended to provide sufficient revenue to operate the sewer 23 enterprise pursuant to the Government Code. 24 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 26 Mayor 27 28 - 2 - I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that 2 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd 3 day of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4 _day of , 2001, by the following vote: 6 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 7 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 8 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 9 10 City Clerk 11 D:\WP51\FILES\Sewer\2001 rates.ord.wpd 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 } 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1658 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08 3 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER COLLECTION RATES AND CHARGES 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1. Notice of proposed revisions to the sewer rates and of the public hearing on 8 the proposed rates was mailed to each property owner in the City and to tenants paying utility 9 bills, and duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, 10 after public hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the price of sewer 11 service to customers must be increased to balance increased costs and improvements and to 12 fund necessary reconstruction. In construction and maintenance of the City sewer system, 13 the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and 14 operate the system. 15 16 Section 2. Section 15.08.070 of the Burlingame Municipal Code is hereby amended to 17 read as follows: 18 19 15.08.070 Sewer rental—Service charges. 20 Every person whose premises in the city are served by a connection with the system of 21 sewerage of the city, whereby the sewerage or industrial wastes, or either or both, are disposed 22 by the city, shall pay a bimonthly sewer charge based upon the quantity of metered water per 23 bimonthly billing period as set forth in the following rate schedule, whether such water is derived 24 from a source other than city water supply or all or part of such water is furnished to the premises 25 without charge. The director of public works shall determine the classification of uses not 26 specifically listed. The finance director shall have the discretion and authority to establish a 27 different sewer charge when circumstances such as water leaks or unseasonable or atypical water 28 • 1 usage cause established rates to result in inequitably low or high sewer charges: any such 2 determination shall be reviewed by the city manager upon request from the customer. 3 Classification Amount 4 (1) Single-family duplex $3.03 per thousand gallons of average water consumption for the billing 5 periods January through April of the years 1999, 2000, and 2001. 6 (2) Multi-family residential $3.75 per thousand gallons of water 7 consumption for the current billing period. 8 (3) Restaurant, caterers, supermarkets, bakeries $9.86 per thousand gallons of water 9 and other commercial food processing and consumption for the current billing food-related commercial period. 10 11 (4) Moderate strength commercial, including $7.78 per thousand gallons of water manufacturing, commercial or industrial consumption for the current billing 12 laundries, hotels with restaurants and hospitals period. 13 (5) Light strength commercial including $6.27er thousand allons water office-warehouse, office buildings, cocktail consumption for thecurrent f billing 14 lounges, auto-related, carwash, laundromats, period. convalescent homes and hotels without 15 restaurants 16 (6) Institutional (schools and churches) $1.21 per thousand gallons of water 17 consumption for the current billing period. 18 19 Section 3. The schedule of rates shall be effective for all billings on and after 20 September 1, 2001. 21 Section 4. The City Council finds that the rates adopted by this ordinance are not 22 discriminatory or excessive and are intended to provide sufficient revenue to operate the sewer 23 enterprise pursuant to the Government Code. 24 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 25 26 payor 41 27 28 - 2 - 1 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that 2 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd 3 day of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th 4 _day of JULY , 2001, by the following vote: 5 6 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI 7 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 8 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3IANNEY 9 10 City Clerk 11 D:\WP51\FILES\Sewer\2001 rates.ord.wpd 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A 4 CITU BUR`N` J, STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 c - MTG. 7/16/01 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: July 9, 2001 BY APPROVED FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY /. I7 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR INSTALLATION OF A S OP SIGN AT INTERSECTION OF TROUSDALE DRIVE AND QUESADA WAY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing to: 1. Adopt proposed ordinance. 2. Direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: At their meetings of April 12, 2001, May 10, 2001, and June 14, 2001, the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) considered the attached petition from local residents. One issue raised as a result of the petition was the need to add Stop signs for access to Trousdale Drive from side streets. Based on this concern, staff developed traffic counts and speed information for various areas, including the intersection of Quesada Way and Trousdale Drive. Existing Conditions Quesada Way at Trousdale Drive is an intersection that receives heavy school day peak traffic flows to/from Franklin Elementary and Burlingame Intermediate Schools and regular traffic into the Ray Park Subdivision area. The tee intersection has stop signs for eastbound Trousdale Drive traffic and Quesada Way traffic but not for westbound Trousdale Drive traffic. This is often confusing to eastbound Trousdale Drive traffic as the westbound traffic is not required to stop before making left turns. It causes hesitation for the Trousdale Drive traffic and consequently for Quesada Way exiting traffic. In particular, this delays traffic turning left off Quesada Way onto Trousdale Drive. The resulting starting and stopping within the intersection is particularly bad during the morning peak hours. Traffic Data Results The traffic count data confirms that a Burlingame warrant is met for placing a stop sign for westbound traffic on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way based on peak hour and total volumes. The accident data for five years was also reviewed. There were seven intersection accidents of which two are considered correctable by an additional stop sign; therefore, the intersection does not meet the criteria for a warrant which requires three correctable accidents in 12 months. Public Hearing The Commission heard testimony specific to this intersection at its June meeting. Staff had notified all residents on the 2100 block of Trousdale Drive and all of Quesada Way to Clarice Lane, Sequoia Drive from Trousdale Drive to Clarice Lane and both Franklin Elementary and Burlingame Intermediate Schools. Staff also posted a stop sign meeting notice for westbound Trousdale Drive traffic. All petitioners and persons who spoke previously were notified. A number of residents spoke in favor of a stop sign indicating difficulty in crossing Trousdale Drive at the crosswalk. Eight letters were received prior to the hearing in response to mailed notices. Seven letters supported the stop sign, one of which indicated that they avoid Quesada Way because of confusion at the intersection. 2- ... .y Page 2 Commission Recommendation The Commission recommended that this stop sign be installed citing the information from staff regarding the confusing intersection and the difficulty of crossing Trousdale Drive during peak school traffic flows. Staff Recommendation Staff recommended that the stop sign be considered by the TSPC as it met the traffic volume warrant. Although there is a low traffic accident history and there would be increased braking noise and gas use, staff believes that the benefits of a stop sign outweigh these concerns. The stop sign would provide a more controlled flow during peak traffic periods, especially for eastbound traffic which backs up as many as ten vehicles in each lane. Also, the stop sign would better facilitate pedestrian crossings. Therefore, staff supports the Commission recommendation. EXHIBITS: Ordinance; TSPC Minutes dated April 12, 2001, May 10, 2001, and June 14, 2001; Signed Petition BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of approximately $700 for the installation of the stop sign and road markings can be met from the current Public Works Department maintenance budget. c: City Clerk, Police Department TSPC 1 ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13.20.010 FOR 3 INSTALLATION OF A STOP SIGN AT THE WESTBOUND INTERSECTION OF TROUSDALE DRIVE AT QUESADA WAY 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1. The City has received a petition for residents of the Trousdale Drive 8 neighborhood seeking relief from traffic problems in the area. In reviewing those concerns, City 9 staff found that the 3-way intersection of Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way met warrants for stop 10 signs in all 3 directions based on peak hour traffic volume. At the current time,Quesada Way and 11 Trousdale Drive eastbound have stop signs,while Trousdale Drive westbound does not. The City 12 Traffic,Safety and Parking Commission considered this information and recommended that a stop 13 sign for the westbound direction of Trousdale Drive be installed. 14 15 Section 2. Subsection 13.20.010(t) is amended to read as follows: 16 (t) Toledo Avenue and Court approaching Martinez Drive; 17 Toledo Drive approaching Trousdale Drive; 18 Trousdale Drive approaching California Drive; 19 Trousdale Drive approaching Castenada Drive and Martinez Drive; 20 Trousdale Drive approaching Hunt Drive; 21 Trousdale Drive approaching Loyola Drive while traveling west; 22 Trousdale Drive approaching Marco Polo Drive while traveling east; 23 Trousdale Drive approaching Ogden Drive while traveling west; 24 Trousdale Drive approaching Quesada Drive; 25 Trousdale Drive approaching Sebastian Drive; 26 Trousdale Drive approaching Sequoia Avenue; 27 Trousdale Drive approaching Toledo Drive while traveling east; 28 1 1 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 2 3 Mayor 4 5 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 6 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day 7 of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 8 day of , 2001, by the following vote: 9 10 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 11 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 12 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 13 City Clerk S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\stopsignOrd.wpd 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes Thursday, April 12, 2001 Phase Four: • Monitor impacts of parking improvements • Determine what, if any, additional measures are necessary Comm.Auran asked why fees are not addressed in Phase One.Mr.Murtuza advised that there is a need to educate the public before raising fees.The Commissioners expressed their desire to increase parking rates in Phase One. Mr. Hurrell stated it could take a minimum of three months to educate the public properly using flyers, chamber meetings, press releases, the City's website, etc. Mr. Erbacher advised that it takes time also to change the meters to accommodate the new rates. It was moved and seconded to recommend to Council adopting the parking plan as presented with the exception of implementing the fee increase in Phase One. Unanimously approved by the Commission. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, and a STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive Mr. Ho advised he has collected various data and counts for the entire stretch of Trousdale Drive at five different locations. The data is extensive and covers peak hours. More information will be available next month. 4.2.2 Millbrae BART Station- Potential Impacts on City streets Mr. Ho advised that he has contacts BART requesting copies of parking surveys.BART has promised to provide the information;however, nothing has been received as yet. 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS -None. 6. FROM THE FLOOR 7. INFORMATION ITEMS 7.1 From Staff to Commission Mr. Erbacher announced that Philip Ho, Traffic Engineer, is resigning this month. The Commissioners expressed their appreciation of his work for the commission. 7.1.1 Bayswater residents supporting traffic calming on Dwight Road and requesting similar traffic calming measures on Bayswater Avenue and Howard Avenue Mr. Erbacher advised that he met with Dwight Road residents to review new plans which were modified and more detailed.Staff will be doing traffic counts,and eventually a proposal will be presented to Council. Residents are interested in participating in costs. SAA Public Works Directory\TSP Commission Minutes\Minutes for 04-12-01 Meeting.wpd Page 3 • TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 10, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair De Angelis. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 5 of 5 Commissioners present. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.1 ACTION ITEMS. 4.1.1 Minutes for April 12, 2001, were submitted and approved. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, and a STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive. Results of Traffic Data Gathering Mr. Erbacher provided a map of the area and reviewed results of various traffic studies performed for background data. Staff recommends 25 mph between Castenada Drive and Hunt Drive since it is a residential area;however,the City Code provides for a 35 mph zone. Sgt. Ransom advised that the courts would not uphold traffic citations based on radar if Trousdale were posted for 25 mph since the study showed the 85%speed was 35-44 mph and it is a four lane street. Mr. Erbacher explained warrant criteria for stop signs and traffic signals;and per the study,staff recommends one additional stop sign at Quesada making this intersection a 3-way stop.Staff recommends truck weight limit enforcement and posting more "8 ton" weight limit signs larger than the existing ones. Comm. Auran suggested posting larger speed limit signs and more school signs. Mr. Erbacher advised that there is a new generation of school signs available now. From the floor, residents requested Botts dots or dips in the road to slow traffic, however emergency vehicles cannot keep pace with emergency response time if there are bumps or dips in the road which would damage their trucks at normal speed. Raised marker rumble strips were suggested but are noisy to neighbors and are for isolated area use.Flashing lights were suggested but the cost is prohibitive, especially since there are no warrants for lighted signals. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to approve staff recommendations for more and larger signage, to move this to an Action Item at the next meeting, and to request the Traffic Sergeant to determine the feasibility of changing Trousdale Drive to a 25-mph zone. Unanimously approved by the Commission. S:\A Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Minutes\Minutes for 05-10-01 Meeting.wpd Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 14, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair De Angelis. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSIONER AND ROLL CALL. Mr. Russ Cohen was welcomed as the new Commissioner. 5 of 5 Commissioners were present. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.1 ACTION ITEMS. 4.1.1 Minutes for May 10, 2001, were submitted and approved. 4.1.2 Proclamation It was moved and seconded(Comms.Mayer/McIver)to accept a proclamation honoring Tim Auran for his service on the Commission from 1998 to 2001.Unanimously approved by the Commission. 4.1.3 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, a STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and a STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way. Results of Traffic Data Gathering Mr. Erbacher provided a summary of eight letters received from local residents since last month's meeting.Seven supported installation of a Stop sign on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way. Four supported reduced speed on Trousdale Drive. Mr. Erbacher advised that a study was performed based on all suggestions received from petitioners. Also provided was the accident history for the last five years. The truck limit sign at Skyline is hard to read from automobiles, but not for trucks. However, it could be better located. Mr. Erbacher advised that the sign will be relocated and an additional sign will be installed. The school signs are adequate, but Mr. Erbacher advised that an additional sign will be installed near Franklin School. Also, at the corner of Trousdale Drive and Loyola Drive, trees will be trimmed to provide better driving sight vision for exiting Loyola Drive. From the floor, 15 residents spoke up with several requests, including the need for reduced speed on Trousdale Drive, Stop signs at Quesada and at Loyola, and more police enforcement.Sgt.Ransom advised that police enforcement is evident with over 100 citations having been issued on Trousdale Drive recently. Mr. Erbacher advised that the 85 percentile speed on Trousdale Drive is 39 mph and higher which seems too high since residents have problems trying to back out of their driveways. He advised that since this is a residential access, the City must provide safe transportation and safe access so the recommended speed is below 35 mph;however,this recommendation is not based on the 85 percentile but on access to the street from side streets and driveways. S:\A Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Minutes\Minutes for 06-14-01 Meeting.wpd Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 14, 2001 Sgt. Ransom advised that he met with a court referee to suggest a lower speed but they wouldn't go for it. They want to see the official traffic survey when they meet next week. Because of the 85 percentile,the courts will not recognize citations issued on Trousdale for speeding if the zone is set below 35 mph.Chair DeAngelis stated that a certified engineer's subjective report could affect the courts decision to lower the speed zone to 30 mph. It was moved and seconded(Comms.Evans/Mayer)to instruct the Traffic Engineer to pursue the effort to get the speed to 30 mph on Trousdale Drive from Skyline Drive to Quesada Way and that it be high priority to coordinate with law enforcement and the courts to justify a lower speed and to report on his progress back to the Commission.Unanimously approved by the Commission. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to recommend to Council the installation of a Stop sign on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way. Unanimously approved by the Commission. Mr. Erbacher advised that Council will be advised of this Commission's recommendation for a Stop sign; however, he did not now recommend it since a stop sign is warranted only during peak hours. The accident history over five years is low, and drivers either use Sequoia per letters or are successfully handling this intersection.He stated that he did not have a strong objection. Since this is a confusing two-way stop,there will be some relief to eastbound morning backups; and there are easier pedestrian crossings to school and field facilities. There will be a public hearing in July or August, and petitioners will receive advance notification of the hearing. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS 5.1 Rector Motor Car Company -Request for One Way Westbound (letter) Mr. Erbacher spoke to the petitioner about his request being on the August Agenda. Mr. Erbacher will speak to him again to see if the petitioner will want to pursue this request. 5.2 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail) Mr. Erbacher advised that the police have been checking the speeds, and he will follow up on the results. 5.3 3138 Rivera- Speed and Signage (e-mail) Mr. Erbacher advised that the police have been checking the speeds, and he will follow up on the results. 5.4 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue- Speed Concerns (petition) Mr. Erbacher will contact the petitioner. Their issues will be forthcoming to the Commission. S:\A Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Minutes\Minutes for 06-14-01 Meeting.wpd Page 4 KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE e to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNAT . ra tss Ca;11q,a 2c4, ! • k _ Da .9 - /• I _ . 0 - . ....Jr' a.. .4 - . a — , /.ion rl r j�►� �, �`�R�cl '1' tiC 7R. 1 — D , APR 18 2001 J; DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS CII Y OF BUHLINGAME January 29, 2001 To: City Council, City Manager, Director of Public Works From; "Ann Musso, City Cler1V Subject: Petition Attached is a petition signed by 271 citizens regarding the traffic safety on Trousdale Avenue. I am expecting a large turnout of residents from this area in attendance at the February 5th meeting regarding their concerns. 1 . KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILD4N SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents an our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced.We request that bo the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and st p sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident occ rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE e v f/0 I Cie?f i am, 1 1 �r✓z �o n4P7/, tYo u,s,1cl jP :p(. 4 FLsrcwER 6c18'-7?)cgs; }2iuc l/UX 64/5'{-1 04 A . G,`,r13,y7_ 2 '- eit,n 27til4 I✓rovc /efrC 592�-z0y4 ) —mo 9a rU 19,19_( I by e17-7c �7 A9.d) KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE ...sue to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE 4 • hi-1J -`)i-3 A k)Clb TVINLC&04 D1 , b5I)691 S -- 1 (;t. AIRvi 1 o.—-,' a-�" `-ez ....2 Sr /C1f ..s �- .. / 7 :-.5 /: •/ '., . !- (,UL ( c.2 ti 2_67z. , ~ a r a .c Ii`'...dccs.-L ((/V immensia.mroAffainnair ic, ' (-Q,C , -, , ( �l4Ta - `--� , . 2-2_ (c-Z - 1-1-.{-/ Ni i/`�_ V. �-ci Li c� '27_24 I sl i 1/I1 chze F/iU , 1l 7 7J ' O) „ I)---3R3_S , .„ Fel- L I 2 7 0 7 I r0i,s,,Z,,; Dr 7S-2 -7 s-g8- ,-' '-_--�. 7<(/-4U V( L ( Z70, 7r0KScLa 1e IDs' tJ ,-2 -- S'S 0 G �� �- . ...:- tor & ,/. ,LeL)he//; .5-1 -*6usdak- / _1/4--(6 rL z CA ecL .z6 cf-s Ty-ow;ckai Q I�r S ., /� t-L. _. ON i ?6 o a r ?�1 ( I tic a. Imo) Z-`' :1__. 2 !L. 'Mf-C fr ,,/ 746t,.., 1W/ic ....... . _.......- ' 6 Irti.V c6r1 L . 0 . 0171 . .._ L_,(4,-- 4.e‘( 6 a/ - PP-4' / -, :,..- ' -.Grr� LV / }G} 'd 1 -i-J e / Pr/IN Ep2- 551 $ ',Ul `_ G 4 or oil ens b roue' aeyr (1 -7 . "ft - b./ { , J Z. (-h- j &S L 1,r1244j (252 - )S. t), ),(A -- K--- h . . i;6t i t tSo feb, rRA wI1 g 311 6-.9-1 k v_� . / csilfwf%f a /anti i - 1-07 5/7 6--C- - 76 / '72 I/7A .�---''" . . , • - KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Jue to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline -0 'i- „Boulevard �.,Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS I TEL SIGNATURE ' _ .: :-1, .7-.Nii L-E - .,,,\- 9 _____JIA..) -'1,4 - -f*S-9_0 27 27 ,:-____: -. , __-____ _ (1-- / P`- A) 0"-{(--i 3 I2. $ . *1416):J AU _ g77 -- q 3g74:2-7 - �-( 2 -.7y\ S07-ci0o , : ( L. 1, t e- 1 C �, • ( t (I . .1 , (._ ( )1 r _( ` - - ` .-- , 777 , 1 4u ,\,__L 4441„, A),.. `,-t' V ---LL ..^�� \ c ,,(\� (l �. `,\,_ t.,-,_:..TAt.,-,_:.. � � -C : ---7(, . 1� -7r, , ' f ( ' 4:7yl ) 1 , ' _4 .4 i e%, 04 .rj_ f c L, $1,2_,, ,6 i, 0r LO 7 P7- L ,f_,L,de__„_ _,)/ ' 1 !V / L f e-,,\ J �- O it W 07 - x 2-3 37acuth,L. ' PI is g-k\-\ Prue S3 S' 9 -4- .` , 61 :114114- _. ,d'Ov` , -1-c2.-7S GA ,\-‹,,LLetti-79---7/ . Gcsp -0( G4 Ibit,/,_ 'S r j 7/ ' 1117 0 ki4C.{° 3 'N' .t- ;� . i 2 tiNt\ )/lt. 4' W ' '1 - Z 9( (lb\ir:Viajr\d, kj, 544- E*14 � l � 1AL 3 7 'iJi . 1,1314-A)/ ft 05_ CdL6-0 -3Y 7 -6, -(0 /4 4?6-7,,,,-) .4. - \ct-tt\-Rici-TS--t c-,:::-Inct-,-, I ?OD Zfre-Loit--ittr- Ag 3LI- ) -0 ?i- ‘. /. -) , -‘,J (`)-t\--7 Z71 Pr l/ L k 5-9-'7 1/ k za---)1A. ,_ )/)(// E-uN (P/ike ';'\/ Mtl :L . 619,66 ,")„ ----__ _,, >_, :, -;=,7_,c--' '--:-:--,--7 - _ AUL ie,fo Z9/C� � , Idox �-� 6 �1 LL �;I'i9 - � .� C- - 6ff(Lr C. / ivy” - .r6r-i t 3e-/-Za6s' / C____CL,—____ —VW G-0()Q.,9(*a-, 6.-� iii64r v cA S.VUa S- 4 ?yi- - ( -s ,Q-e 1 I-i' , :)-7.\ii.r.i 1 Lc ( di 0 Cierrf'inoll e, f>„ c K C2 /:75 ---(-4-g" ci 94„_,4 . Ked2,e111, 0/, �2,7 ).I f c . 7.7 3 X 773 ‘,/4,/j ------c--- . —�_ WA ICO f 3 5LI/LAO , (761 - t/ityl ec,_,,,) LT---- 3 i(),(! - -r M; ( t 10-caul- c( 1--- 6-ci ) , Sy e, 7C_VW . a2-- - ,S c 73 (p /0)-et ______L-AA,A__„(___ ____PL,,, S 6 - r I \L_. yi L -- -) •i (o v \,e` 0L/,_ KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame,we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE fa4"rtCFct�/\Vdril I 104 Ali itiv,-7.0.-v ., )1Afta»,_P7s,,,,,,„:"...„4,,_ �Q d Sort- 2 S7-2S/y"Aui.w ,- -- s? ( A ;)O, A ,rO (rro • Seco a5`1- 6 n 1/' [� .P . ... DI S 0 o 6), ,e S 9-). ? .r #' AI -- taliA a 0 r,,Scoo_�5 P-7Sy' ,, -k I1•� ° ( . n � b ' 61 2,-C-( ' ti C Dj- -1) _ m 0 G.,,,,n £ l a A c 1-1 P-i ta,,.,,(pN7 1w 9.5cr-20).c 7/6,4„,/,,,,,,,,„:& hia4,-r Agk129 o CL41,., -Amu. 5'9-W,G ,,C AI; , Ai.,.« - 6. c 0,...,1,,e.P -Q n-- .699'2 jos-- /< - ,, cii:74;., , ptk, 3 d r.(7140:17�/ 1�1w_ irk 3 4-Z- q t-T x.�-� �_ .j .." tzi /Amy ,____ ,./Do ctAttsit. A P 15 53T--iszis-- f..614,litc,l ...,iel, go/ot 1,7. 7c. .4 ..,.._ wI,n,,),,6,6 530 phi, . Ltlog3.-(-I3zz -744.x, Ile',/,' /?-v'ev" ao5 /rbr, vs M- S-9-95151_-_5V--// Jh i iAv'f ,2ooi Eel's Tho Dk 3a7-ys-�Y`E t1)rM/- r \ Qoc-2, Trots! , :32. t tar '. C;f,e( 5111-0t5e90 a -, Ue\, (4 (-lam) .�., cudi j' �' 30�h' A1cryaaI Dr- 6?7- i ` -' ; i -5-u ,., &(a-fa 3SS M;nnrca kiai, Egh_,c6`? 7ti,i. 77a-Z 1 4,,C',,„,.a.., . 1? At((-CCN Ca%NSnu_ _(:),,,,_:: 62,1 4 t z' ,,,.s2,_ 3(I - 724 G�/�.e. 7dS5I eun.,s 5 U e, 54S Ii4rctiisoAJ AVI 05 V,/-4ggy Jame---✓�� Scali l '?cw I.rdni (344-.Tee.ckz A,t 11"6 °cs+O .11(4•arky NltA tiAt, /.54,,Iru.N m:'v. 50-4519 .. /U(iAIli� om. Tei, Ga-1-auy Int.Vt5-$ A 6Q,,M(b t, "1 b� PIA IA 4 r"i)---X t . KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safet} laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that botthe speed Limit and limitations on truck size to be enforced and the st p sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident occrs. _ NAME ADDRESS TEL 1 SIGNATURE 07)1141kyk /hi )3 f I p---/-); i ; -)- u 7477S-4,7727- 2,4 /2_ , .'. I Z .- ''. / - 77:(_5Sk I I tel&. _ ( h I k°+fid #.1'"Y4 ' -4%f f ire., "- 4s .-,96 4, 1 r . ' _ . ' a . /P-2/ Se6a cl;am_ PE:.__._ 6 9� -6- /`j' . ,?'4.:,--i.4,. . v i,Gznk ��d tC . f 7'01(71 �Ci�.4.--- �aCom. ,� ti evmac 3W —IU -1 a-'Ps t y► —Tr �' ' k lit tX/ sgs ot.... .,lakA 91- 129?-353,„ • eritta `� / .LIAL s , t /�grtiYL__Pi' k2-2-°6 -do IDA,L, you/\4 1 53 a(44,ir:JoLiAlo.41 4q-i--(44-74 / _. ager '' r1_ <S\ ' ._.:.. B i o C.- 1G 9n--ta s _�.. - �, 'AMAMI 4'26'6 , :e __ .07-p-.3-1 /�� `l i►�14 t r�A 7 0 b fit. snl ry of b f MilliPirVil 7 l&r 7- el A ' 4s2„-)-0-3. f -7;74=5 Sibr, �✓+ /1? A) �- ,� e ,o D. 3-4 q01-7-1351 Ps O 1/763 z �.e., .. .e(k �A Gp°3 1 , s z,�.. ! 3 76,-6-Z e7„...-.33 6 -946 at, ?-u L( • 0i{ oix, .2 1 !0 if -!- 1 dpi �1 (;�Q. �.tyki : -a ?1 7r044,„:"..e..ze ` �2z_,033 1Y . , - („c„..._Or iii;(kl y, 1S l� w� . 10-er � -I. ciL:__. 3-?5-(50'? 7 ilii Ott •:t,r11111/1L'K J 4 1--7'(--- I330 (14p-r4t) frq.1). .t1 .5-54)./(i. , ,- ,1,-,„,,,, , , `ciie5 _IS4 (P.S_h�_�� v��, I .3-i Ici I rai, KX- 'i • • KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Jue to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE 0fl S--A 0 127o a Coo;no -k(`, b1- s� - )-4 :, �, -,—.�__� ,A .1 �� � ,--- k \f :"-E di\e (/t)- ( P l Q u,cG „ .), ?,_,,ix Z I-`--Z‘p-yr.i t1 _ f '\ f�) /' P l� J GSA ��6i:7G97 A W P L/l�� D L a w v 1 t e -p„ vq.fl , lC- ' /. y iv 4:i ? S- j,,,v •.J Av,,•i,z ct,, 6(')..2 (1 _ S- ... _ ..-e_-.i.�---- d e 1'l --6 7 A I a - 1 , -.'. t - . 1 U ,i _.Ai ----- (4) U t b,i,t �.(,-,i6 Sl at I -1,6)� i't_ iccf_'1�, ?c; L i i ,✓ �7../ 1 , , !^ / r / C ' �f J "J t.1 61 0 ' 4 . • i 2 ff,?o!'1 �i� .` __ , G�q 7 l ✓ 7 `;-_e ' .I l ii ,,, ,- ; . . "A) .,-, — • wotki A0C34 69 Ll--9 W-'-AZ ' -d al P1-E, j'-5` r v-? , f Cn l 7-1 o y1 1'1�,� 4,,M,./..- _47 /14, /b (1-3.L-6:4g-i-6 a,;<:..( 67.7.7-Va?ei , ..-744(4. /\s 1 h.) 1,- ..., EQ-6 ¶J, N J'-. A-.'1 k„,--)74,2_, a r l ,. • 6 b. 7./ tJ r// Avi —71 u.:-e_._` lJ ( -S 9 Vie,+ (i �� �� ---ca i _9 , ;--‘k 4, , j A.' / Pme-ficzig 0 -07-/ov 41-, -(--(4f ' . k-, . I/ 1.--tA xli--N ,/ (IttL -3()o, M CU-Cd.ek_ 1A)C6i,(6)9T- (R,:t. /..___ ) A.f. - .\_ . ,Iii-c ,_,, � �` �,;avLvtr\ 1. ,. 3 �0 5�ci �`;c /., - 1.� yz2 , 1 ____1CkfileA enair,V6 \ <L.0,-\r-V_ -tr) . C6V\--c-D(.0) ity\ci - (Et ( -1(:/1 4,---, A � /rel ' h c,-)� /4,, 6 y7 w_s Z. w�244_,44--' , /`(- . -.2-5 S. 5i t i'11- 1'13 5 in ti - / 'y 1.l-- J17-7) S. 4.(10v,1 .4--:. t/Z Yl , ; /1 . .k)..�z,`. .. foxes" '�- `.;_.— Cf7-e,'xz- r • - KEEP RESIDENTS AND 01TR CHILDREN SAFE'. . 'Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at t cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE -{i"-,, gpyri n 2/ M111 :�7 3 ;tip «.1e.fr )2 cg , 5' af.,„.2.3.,... .__ _--..., ;Ai 6 B 6 1...., 6 .1-1\-, 11 n 7 Iv r f isr rt __,,, ,_(...4,„... cIR 7_7,..1n RAA<A1•r✓ `�'u _c i a`f 7R,u sd R,�- bp. 4,9`1-`f 7.3S) 4--,,z- --e: -„OlLO-77 ei,(27eve9T 8o4 7 ooV; 9LL .ai a697-473b'r - - .til-� _ /. , , f4111i- �rv � / a,�e .;G � lFo l�2 -per Hy 9 "�� 9 7 7reiz-3 7 F 4} , , e,. i _ -? voi,,,,. ,,w, 4,,,ti, , Li, , iii ,,,,,,,& ,4, ,v4 i , incV4- i'%. -2.-- .5 ?LIPireir." :Air 7b 1ai7 41'4 ?8O5 T�-cv ale , 5.5 2• `J n S. ©O , , /< 7176Al f cV9// �,��,v) of - �s.�,)-7 (� 7— KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILD EN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents anour children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that bo the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and st p sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident occ• rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATUR S rut),271- &Tcitlf't g -s- cuY1')I3 1-i D , 3VY-2? . / , .�i M.�aQl L;1 ann i-oi (3(a- n Feld///���R-4 cid-Li-0 '�r1 �/-w- 0�1� L1 --(mann -i-fol GI 004' A - •S7q-q.(5- r .� •�" `. ',eh • I : . o--‘ o ={-, 5- )--v /.moi 1, j ,: 4, ,. ----- 7_ fifc,f(t "( ,1\ 6;_e ,ao -)3 lo6exe_oy`) icoq __/0/.0j r• q r. * �LAc-r�c, Lc,/ �. L7_/4--. A_�Ga// 3 ------ ( PTI . S 2 Z / ZNisi(inOt' -76o y- -10111, �- /prmh-e. Cf I- {f /a c.e3rz�-�-7 / 5 ci-og3 . u4,7-e- ( - , / �,1 (1 GI c.� --( .,.)4- - Iv 1 �ca-- G-c A ! -c3 ti 3 �1 , /5\aiyy-t_ L/01- -1:* se,%NU Mi. ' W' c (1111 iCo2D r b e OS ti% v(u 13-�0� . q).-3 .l �u N S._ 3 .s" v FSEs � • l� 1' 1/ . ' ' 3q7--,%5‘ �_�, , _ • ' ,sU -7/�-t .�-( r(A- l/ h� f�`-' ,Jf � ,•:, s-vi,-(w!, IVR! n /r Ohy Ira R /1i)11 �/f f f jc ei /r f ,�./? /L,,yl , ak4'/; 52. r) .272it 1-/' z_ ON , g2 0695 vlad" �� ,Dorn ko�-lad;nom_10 to ! /t'o/( ,.r 3U2:5y I V 1 fi, Lt i l°/ - S3/ Pilimig- _MAW A.,.. _t i\c N zo,k 1't ,1 1c� ' 4,tee � ���. td)-) kik (k--0(2,-4A-y4r c;?it n \kOWISI (' kifo t 'I - 3407;6 ytC 6uckteit. :13 Cc }� ;� fie, C71-4(42 ►, lrl I 1 • ' KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE - )ue to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. ;d. ADDRESS TEL SIGNATU , .-- , ', , >49,S— .,„,,t„,“:3L,__ _ #72e, ., - ,---- 7 , - m -- ,7i i i,u(G�-e- .s-v�36,2 ,,, 1---____ . 62-, '/` c 2e2-0 Jf L - P1 A ( 31/--)- yeo / Ji —1 (iff,R6 MO -A-'. pi l: A;(to kve. 303% . i G if ice' IDuLii.,D , 7a-e eabyytAJ3-726 le // 1 i Xi-rrY, . .... .. tic, _•i...1 1 ,,, I. ,e- - . - ( -7-/ ul I7c5f 7r,.#6, 6ia •F a .4,, -14 2,i)/2 Th)us‘t,-e,•bv.,k 6'2_ -8172_ , 02 ` =_' Ae,L,,-6-1 c 0 ‘,1 frr /i.. -r.,. ..,, Act i 41?,---awro . .- l�1uv /// • zvei. �. /.2i '4" (-7'...-"-c-P—,_ ___),_cH,„ ,_ / 4______ . ma' 1,e)(4-,-8 .2M( cztj-c (31 2 i 4 .-1 b T4. 4N 11%50 S- ate;.. ‘k, g.-\* -3M ,k,1 ilt, 4,-_ ,0 ad.„-tcd Lyt. 3,,,,s5- roia-y-- . ' 7f v o2670? T sr 2_z_ /),. _ 6 9 7 - 77.2- • ii,n--&-6., /,,,A4_ /a2s-_5 ta.i6e_. c--L,, t-- I 7dd ' ,., ,,) ,,,, -,' L. -c: t:__. iLi. p L TA L G HA i 7 i'IL POT?71 ',3 /-- :)--) SD v Co(� 41 ( S auoiy4 (Ad _2 -t A VA/ it (14 4E 40S� Z3=^ -r_ ,tr. - PW\NA s,„dri,, e-fi,- P,ki <-, ,,\)c\ v ,-, v- -2. .7 — -2,s-to-- 1:-),_R___ J...:, KL-wkfo.,i_____ W,.__ I vz,g - 24-r- AvL 1Ak P A&( CJeurf Z 6 o 4X30 -e 1 ‘.,i .7-z----- n KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents an our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that bo the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and st p sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident occ rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SI c NATURE 70*{, DLe ze 1 Bo¶ • 6q, ,61a is 1 . reran�.�..�-� LGi `i1- h�/ TRA 1/ IZ4;73:LICkDr iq 2-,;tmv `-77 �1 v ./-!�/'(&JL C4/77p65 .2 f 3S . ( ice ��? E97-17Vf- , , t g (41 '144110" 411 (017- 7 /v �' ;���`4 ��IG�E.,v�Cu- 1 ✓1�-i;&5--z?! - �ti.0�L�-c� A - 4-e.v.,c� 1 % z Li-L.4,4-11; 1 • • • • KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe ' laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that bo the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and stogy sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident occ rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL '10 ATURE r 1. nn. Fa (11 1400e /i'r ( Alie' c 7yl_ ' ' `,- / ,.1z L S\N 15 3 NVI,CVa• . 3 S CzkL t /A, .� l CI, LtiVAL la f(P ed&C^ lAY'?Al4L q q''a s-i- 1 i 1W `�P i hc C� sT" c h/l(� `3 exilvytxo c tl4u C4 &A Q ,.— AiitS'Y1 /1- 17 v rrbc;E coa-r, .Spq 9171,,z 34-S-f6; ...OA. - " Z+t ( =(--s-k. 13 -, . p i) 7) R 6/ I1 . .ti ‘ <ra<Sc. s 7),I Lc 7_5- 7aS �,, . -_._ C.74-f c c IAA,- 1 �A/ .CC_7-. — -. :t�. i )(_,\ Ckte,,,R i�L( y R'4-�- �-.1o`f oL41- pg._ 1.,- c12_---2-`71.9 r �( ------ On .l r^ ss; 7 «:,c1 -Ec a Sj-o i-33 .., 7 ; ) '2 fa0 f)i . i / 2 -673; rtr�:d ie / A pd j,,��♦ I /.,,,,, /f�,e.c«r S o 1`t c /` LY-1-4)3(/)-- �n/. ,c.<% fdtib, i ,i, i-31c( litwi,,it,ipc„. A7 4/7/A ' , . •,� 3 •1'G [-Co it 1 ,: d ;fig ,1/ 11 . 1 _ 1 . 1l KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILD a' EN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents an our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that bo I the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and stip sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyola Drive be put up before a tragic accident .acc• rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE ' .44. MA • C , ,QR,j .Trccafe Di-. '/;it�fr 677-"Il- 4 r �. ��1 C A.: ti( ,.,67,r aGt r r 25/- , ethH' 7,1 ( 7� kg--/147--e--- } /� �._, \\\ 1 n i , - 1__ 1, ,, /'._l , ,-, , �f'�, -, /(7//� � '� 7-- , i�� `. l T� ��., 4`, r , :5-y4b-v1 L ,'& 2- 6e-i.404 /0 gr,4-, 7ezi -a( r + IA CAA44 _ ,1 O0 Its o 11\\1`c q-,t_fr-( (125 C e C 14ARILyN TNoe ,' -5z G rev/s J b(z. #20 s tiztw6 5A - 35 , /.. _' `j 14 .)4000 LIu 1105 1tJWO IP_ Int) --. ; - 5` _ '"J!v (3„,„„r„,,,,,, 1 ,,--4_, 123, ,,, Ig, ( ,___ r_A g)- 102-, )-- f (-t- ____., { \ii-i,„,-,1-Q.res, . 5131(41'R/1i Li , 1/1;//ii4---6,c 5.,c3 -s--y/t i.C4/V-cit-: 4-(4(2,-_-,): h KM' 6, 46 '' ct - ) I.kik Cy ' ___ Q1- ue li v. gl' Ill -k Mk, ,,)- - - c_r> ' ,/ -7., ' , - ..,, - / i // ,/g k / te . f:A-. e- ' , ,-,-. , fr, ./0 ‘ A-ruKjimp, C al , t 6177 C-iav-S D o7. Rc p.,.., Cit - G `j2-- r -(AA_Aai---- 41x..cJiLt,t2 y lcti,`T `ey _ ).t . / 4:,f.t y,.5, 61n- Cc7.-GIs - �. a,x, &# 1..14,-a-" ,31 dD S .C • t o ALM :81'4110 (9-171-,10-40q// ,4 t-ti,, /a. p f PV/I1 N(1-44-j(7' ‘R CA"?"40:PA,b vr2- i-1,4 443,2.4-6- ='--e75- --1z-(., ....,= 4C, A a g I S r - di . 4. A bl S i - .A • c-a .-SS;r 14: - g / gill , (I ` v./1 CH I / '(\/ ) '. ` • s GI • 17-` > �y, a yv •_ 01/A'--51,/ �. ((-.4� ? pe,yv zz.-u 2- -e��_,_cr _/4 p ), ISI (1, ri -__s . - • -.40 _ .0.1.." 774....10.1 ar ' i-V-/ ' . ‘ ..thrr.M4 / 7/7 to C4e-7/ c. 2-. 7Ori G A I-/%as Pi- , 7//1 , -e P ..-2017 3 { 7c( . '.'/ Me(' C2vot'-r,(\ , q eti rrL NI xl;1IGira-e- - -/(1t.-:,?5-? : Re: ,,--r'/t^-- . , , KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR. CHILDREN SAFE Jue to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame,we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard and a stop sign on Trousdale Drive downhill toward El Camino Real at cross street Loyola Drive before a tragic accident occurs. NAME ADD' ESS MIN SIGNATURE WINIMAIM ire-s• . 4/07 e e. :2g1,3 roc—Cct eed r ga,^. 6 r7-7,K- Nit /". -8023 T , 'tS•ale b, S )"7( '-7 '/L_! / e_ / IE £ 7 e ice.FEW r 7 I .1 -- L���,�� �/ Esn�<L.v �4,,, /f. ' ll- 'i7 p� - 7 g�2 ` id l�l�, rilc Gy 60../ 2- ��,.r- Trwc. 6q 1MM: MISZEISIIIMMINIM 9 . i C=- _ . DEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced and the stop and go lights be put up on the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard -- - . 'I f NAME • T T T Yl!} .r„T CI 7!'� T A TT T77 T ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE -AI Ire- 4 / m„ .e,i / ell, ice,/-"V-' 4 7,;10- "1- , ,d .. 1 ,,,-r) . c 0 k -frq't( ei-r-ciR,1[Q Dt. (iir-r .c7)(q7 i fi, zostry, ,kl joqi ,,, L. v .'ir .( P I I.d 6 -- l '� ;?71 � �� (r-,-4/7.7? '_ � CS l7 l!/ S.-.7 _,,,•� hitt-i-tst-r7 f I- Z 97 y 4Tt UelP'' (ru /ti 7 r7rzf---,,,Z.c.L0 ego ,1 y /,, w5e)6977765 - -,)(� --' a , _ 1 -?7ido--- --6 . - > / IA Leos 2181 yu.-llo frt.6y7 --1 = • / ei �- . ' ��� �G ����e ,� . � X74 1� _/ . r l a��/mss --) ��� 9 S'r r u /i / f Si-- /t ille 97 , ;elf- ,. / _31),A.- -- • - . of ;) 0109M /t-\/), _.,07-, M- ---u4-(//-' , --• -' • A,V' __IIM.6- 4 ( ✓U( . ,6. _ 61a 1 1 ( Vrfi/ ( ,'j M 70-4----1, - -(__7, U • • KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILD '.EN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents an+ our children in Burlingame, we respectfully ask for the traffic safe laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced. We request that boy the speed limit and limitations on truck size be enforced, and step sign on Trousdale Drive downhill towards El Camino Real a cross street Loyala Drive be put up before a tragic accident occ rs. NAME ADDRESS TEL SIGNATURE , Tr;ReT/0-)1,53 - ezze,47 _Nana vsi iL� � K0.c'-QI? C'-t-. S0Sttc Kamer C+• t."- A4CI CS 1 0 b kCt-rgrt Ca v2; 0. A L t C nt ER C E G 3 H ELEu ERCEG C11,1;3-‘, .1 � ��4 C'11/A/Com,, I /� C C • • i FF'[1(t : ',EFS REPORT I i J; Fcs= : E.50:4 29i .Jan. 29 21:101 01 F'2 To : ANGELA CHEUONG FROM : JULIE MEYERS DATE : Jan . 29 , 2001 697 - 2454 have attached the letter you ' ve requested . I don ' t have any additional signatures ; however , Ron Nade f was at the last PTA council Meeting at Sony DeMarto ' s request , and safety issues around the city are being discussed . z can ' t attend any Monday meetings , and i ' v( actually 1Y maxed myself and am unable to take on any other projects at this time . I hope I ' ve been of help . Thanks b/ 5 • FR'br•1 : 1 IE•r'ERE REPORT I NG FAX hal(, - 650747-7"=4.S Jan. 29 2Ei0i 01:2r,P1-1 • P. 1 RAPFIC SAFETY f!vPROM-MINTS IN 1 URINGAME Please be advised that in addition to the attached petition , as citizens in Burlingame , we feel an extreme need for several safety measures to be put in place for all pedestrian traffic , and especially for our children_ One of those safety measures would be the installation of Pedestrian Crossing Lights , which are embedded in th7 ground and triggered when a pedestrian waits at the sidewalk to cross . San Mateo has installed. these for their downtown pedestrians , and Burlingame should be capable of the same . Per Ron Metzers , San Mateo Public Works Engineer , these devices run approximately $40 , 000 per contract, with an additional $10-15 , 000 for design and inspection fees . Applications are due Jan 31, 2001 to the OTS , Office of Traffic Safety for potential help in this regard , and to TDA, Traffic Development Act , were due last (or next ! ) November . . Thank you , in advance , for looking into these safe- measures , particularly in the Trousdale area . :!U dan U1 1b:bI v,PU •'•" r•`- FRWI : PHONE N0. : JAN'. 10 2001 10:52NN P2 JIUUJI IUJ7 U1)10 UI IJV.UI NU.9 4 UI KEEP RESIDENTS AND OUR CHILDREN SAFE Due to our concerns for the safety of the residents and our children in Burlingame.we respectfully ask for the traffic safety laws on Trousdale Drive to be enforced.We request that both the speed limit and limitations on truck size to be.enforced and \,--4• n\ \.VYs ana s'•:\``s NAME AD//DRESS� TEL SI c NATURE SI_I,oc1 .30e)5 l`�"„ie � S vl Satsl 1505 495 A1/-051.i 5 .67tc1 difav Rerili4./Znceis ,_7 vis aS7d.`! /1;L�./ I Lim 1405-°- IPA Avg . 1 ' S c -11..__ OVArlft 2 MR 02. :a Gam_r{9� o;i I ,moo- If bc to, -. .._ � ZYI-)'3 (a I_y__69-2-33)-'7. 'L, _. .1 qea\C. 21p1 .ham Dt - MP' .E.►... 13$2JTt 349-9ct �I/IIS.. / 4r. _ • a •..T101TiOCL[33Co-Corlo5.__CuLn .1 el1cct,Reu.rl,barxjl. 364 l onc_1���.._3�u I Glona C'orna 11514`} Carol Ave 1342-2855 rr 1510,CiAmno-•- Cl..l it• Jr. r 135`1 Gr+e _ ,3,13--96e CC %; •� \tea- — .� \�, �_ I. 13 __I V10% 4.7 ivIQL. SII cel. . , - ' i n1 313`13—; r, 1 /tio� ► C � 1111r1c\,<, ME MORANDUM UR41 a BLNGN wE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 �90 RPORATEO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 11 , 2001 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO INSTALL A STOP SIGN ON WESTBOUND TROUSDALE DRIVE AT QUESADA WAY For your information, attached is a notice advising of Council's public hearing on the installation of a stop sign on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way. This notice has been sent to all petitioners and residents and schools within the affected area and four local newspapers. F 07 George Bagdon Attachment cc: City Manager t _ _ CITY BURLINGAME tau:it 0 RPORATED The City of Burlingame PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD CORPORATION YARD Tel:(650) 558-7230 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 Tel:(650) 558-7670 Fax:(650I 685-9310 NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGN TROUSDALE DRIVE AT QUESADA WAY WESTBOUND TRAFFIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 p.m., Monday, July 16, 2001 City Hall, Council Chamber, 501 Primrose Road At their meetings of April 12, 2001 , May 10, 2001 , and June 14, 2001 , the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered a petition from local residents. As a result of these meetings and investigations, the commission determined that there is a need to add a stop sign for westbound vehicles on Trousdale Drive at Quesada Way. You are invited to attend a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, July 16, 2001, at the City Hall Council Chamber. At this meeting, Council will conduct a public hearing before enacting the ordinance. For questions, call Engineering at 650 558-7230. « r ORDINANCE No. 1659 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13.20.010 FOR INSTALLATION OF A STOP SIGN AT THE WESTBOUND INTERSECTION OF TROUSDALE DRIVE AT QUESADA WAY 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1 . The City has received a petition for residents of the Trousdale Drive 8 neighborhood seeking relief from traffic problems in the area. In reviewing those concerns, City 9 staff found that the 3-way intersection of Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way met warrants for stop 10 signs in all 3 directions based on peak hour traffic volume. At the current time, Quesada Way and 11 Trousdale Drive eastbound have stop signs, while Trousdale Drive westbound does not. The City 12 Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered this information and recommended that a stop 13 sign for the westbound direction of Trousdale Drive be installed. 14 15 Section 2. Subsection 13.20.010(t) is amended to read as follows: 16 (t) Toledo Avenue and Court approaching Martinez Drive; 17 Toledo Drive approaching Trousdale Drive; 18 Trousdale Drive approaching California Drive; 19 Trousdale Drive approaching Castenada Drive and Martinez Drive; 20 Trousdale Drive approaching Hunt Drive; 21 Trousdale Drive approaching Loyola Drive while traveling west; 22 Trousdale Drive approaching Marco Polo Drive while traveling east; 23 Trousdale Drive approaching Ogden Drive while traveling west; 24 Trousdale Drive approaching Quesada Drive; 25 Trousdale Drive approaching Sebastian Drive; 26 Trousdale Drive approaching Sequoia Avenue; 27 Trousdale Drive approaching Toledo Drive while traveling east; 28 1 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. / f / r 3 C v\/0-e Dtt mayor 4 5 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 6 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day 7 of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1 hth 8 day of JULY , 2001, by the following vote: 9 10 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI 11 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 12ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JANNEY 13 City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\stopsignOrd.wpd 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Jul 10 01 11 : 21a superintendent office 6507620249 p. 2 San Mateo Union High School District Thomas C. Mohr, Superintendent t� w1� p ,50 North Delaware Street San Mateo, CA 94401-1795 1 ''� (650) 762-0200 � + E o oes *item c0.0 (650) 762-0249 FAX AGENDA ITEM# 7 a July 3, 2001. MEETING DATE: 7-16-01 To: Jim Nantel City Manager - City of Burlingame From: Nancy Kraus f t..-vt4.` Executive Asst. to Superintendent Re: Scheduling the Superintendent for City Council Meeting We are asking permission for Superintendent Thomas Mohr to speak to the Burlingame City Council at its meeting on July 16, for approximately ten minutes, to update the Council and community on programs in the District including boundary study and modernization of the high schools. If that date is not convenient, may we ask for the following announcement to be made, and then let me know please what date would work. Tom Mohr, Superintendent of the San Mateo Union High School District, is committed to spending more time in Burlingame meeting with members of the community in discussion about the District's boundary study, open enrollment, and school modernization. His office is pleased to assist in scheduling meetings with homeowner associations, neighborhood groups, PTA's, service clubs. etc. His new schedule of coffee hours in Burlingame is also available. To schedule a meeting with Superintendent Mohr or for more information, please call 558-2201. I'll look forward to hearing from you - 558-2201. Thanks very much. nk Adult School -Aragon - Burlingame - Capuchino - Hi isdate - Mills - Peninsula - San Mateo An Equal Opportunity Employer AGENDA ITEM# 7 b BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT DAT � uuurr, DATE 7/16/2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: July 11, 2001 APPROVED',` .� BY Iii l Ar.. E. ff Anderson City Larry Attorne y SUBJECT: CONSIDER POSSIBLE BALLOT PROPOSALS FOR THE NOVEMBER 2001 ELECTION REGARDING:1) CONTINUING THE 10% TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX RATE; 2) CONTINUING THE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE TAX AT $100 PER YEAR; 3) ESTABLISHING A COMMERCIAL PARKING TAX AT THE RATE OF 5% OF GROSS REVENUES RECOMMENDATION: Continue discussion on possible ballot measures as follows: a. Whether to continue the transient occupancy tax rate at 10% b. Whether to continue the general business license tax at $100 per year c. Whether to place a tax on commercial parking facilities at the rate of 5% of gross receipts. DISCUSSION On July 2, 2001, the Council conducted the first public hearing on whether to place the following measures on the November ballot: a. Continuing the transient occupancy tax increase of 8%to 10% adopted in 1991. b. Continuing the general business tax increase of$50 per year to $100 per year adopted in 1992. c. Adopting a commercial parking facilities tax of 5% of gross receipts, which was adopted in a different form in 1992. All three are currently general taxes, and staff recommends that they remain general taxes. Revenue from a general tax is placed in the City's general fund, while revenue from a special tax is placed in a fund earmarked for a designated purpose, such as road repair. This means that to be approved, the measures would require a vote of more than 50% of those casting ballots regarding the measure. [A special tax requires a 2/3's approval]. Mayor and Council Re: November 2001 Ballot Proposals July 11, 2001 Page 2 Transient Occupancy Tax The transient occupancy tax is placed on the rent (room charge) paid for guest rooms in hotels in the City. It is not applied to food, beverage, or other separate amenities at hotels. In 1991, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1439, which raised the transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10%. The transient occupancy tax currently raises about $14 million per year, and the 2% increment amounts to approximately $2.8 million, or about 11% of the City's annual general fund. Of the local agencies in the County of San Mateo, nine (9) have a transient occupancy tax rate of 10%, and two (2)have a transient occupancy tax rate of 8% (Belmont and Foster City), South San Francisco assesses at an 8% rate, plus a $2.50 per night tax. It is one of the few taxes that is somewhat immune from seizure or diversion by the Governor or the Legislature and is the key to the City's financial independence. The 2% increment has financed such capital improvements as the Library reconstruction, Bayside recreational improvements (golf, soccer, baseball, dog, and walking facilities), and the operating cost for the free hotel/commuter shuttle. For 2001-2002, the Council allocated $460,000 from the 2% increment to refurbish the Burlingame High School football/soccer field. This increment has also been a significant factor in receiving a Standard& Poor's AA rating for the current financing of the corporation yard, which reduces any financing cost. Business License Tax In 1992, the City Council adopted a major revision to the business license code in Ordinance No. 1459. A portion of this ordinance raised general business license taxes from $50 to $75 and then to $100. With a few exceptions, the City's business tax is a flat tax of$100 per year regardless of gross receipts or employees. Most communities in the County have a much more complex business tax scheme and charge twice as much or more for business taxes. The flat business tax generates about $404,000 each year, with the $50 increment generating about $230,000. While a valuable source of revenue, its key asset to the community is as a means of documenting business activity and location so that Fire, Police, Building, and Planning can ensure that they are safe and legal. Mayor and Council Re: November 2001 Ballot Proposals July 11, 2001 Page 3 Commercial Parking Tax Ordinance No. 1459 imposed a 5%business license tax on airport parking facilities. The current tax generates approximately $260,000 per year. Staff does not believe that the structure of that ordinance is appropriate in focusing on a single type of commercial parking activity. The draft resolutions attached include two possible versions of a business license tax on commercial parking facilities: 1)Version 1 would exempt facilities that are not the predominant business on the parcel, such as on a hotel or bank site, and that are exclusive storage or parking facilities for vehicles owned by a business, such as an automobile dealer or utility company. 2)Version 2 would remove those exemptions and place the tax on all commercial parking facilities. Direction Requested The Council should continue consideration of whether to prepare one ballot measure for all 3 taxes, or to separate them. It appears that the clearest course may be to prepare 3 ballot measures as drafted. The Council should also consider which of the 2 parking facility measures is most appropriate to present. Finally, any corrections, additions, or other changes to the proposed measures and resolutions should be discussed. A public hearing has been set to further consider these matters on July 23, 2001, at 9 a.m. At that time, it is hoped that the ballot measure resolutions can be adopted. Attachments: Draft Resolutions with Ballot Measures and Ordinances Attached RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDERING THE SUBMISSION OF A MEASURE REGARDING THE TAX RATE OF THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX TO THE VOTERS; DETERMINING THE QUESTION TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS REGARDING THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX; AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 45-2001 REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 6,2001 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS,the City of Burlingame raised the transient occupancy tax from 8 percent to 10 percent on September 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court has now decided that any tax imposed by a local agency after November 1986 requires voter approval regardless of any delay in bringing any challenge to the tax; and WHEREAS, the transient occupancy tax provides over $14 million per year to the City's general fund, and the two percent differential means a difference of approximately $2.8 million per year; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Burlingame wishes to submit the 10 percent transient occupancy tax rate to the voters of the City for approval pursuant to Elections Code § 9222 and Government Code §§ 53723 and 53724; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A hereto is the exact form of the question to be voted on at the general election, as it is to appear on the ballot; and WHEREAS, Exhibit B hereto is the proposed ordinance for submission to the voters as it would appear in the ballot pamphlet; and WHEREAS,the proposal should be submitted to the voters at the upcoming general 1 election; and WHEREAS, this Resolution has been adopted by at least a two-thirds vote of all members of the City Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: 1. The question to be submitted to the voters at the municipal general election on November 6, 2001, as stated on the ballot is contained in Exhibit A hereto, and the text of the measure being voted on in that question is contained in Exhibit B hereto. 2. The proposed transient occupancy tax rate would be at ten percent (10%) on the rent charged to any transient by any hotel in the City of Burlingame, collected by the operators of the hotels in the City, and be used for general government purposes of the City. There would be no change in rate, collection, or uses from the current Municipal Code. 3. Resolution No. 45-2001 is hereby amended to request the services of the registrar of voters, request consolidation of elections, and specifying procedures for the consolidated election to include this measure. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to include notice of the measure to be voted on in the notice of election directed by Resolution No. 45-2001. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to do all other things required by law to conduct the election regarding this measure. 5. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 9282 and 9286, the City Clerk is further authorized and directed to establish and publish the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure; select the argument for and the argument against the measure to be printed and 2 distributed to the voters as set forth in Election Code § 9287; enable preparation and submittal of rebuttal arguments as set forth in Elections Code § 9285. The City Council hereby adopts the provisions of Elections Code § 9285(a) with regard to rebuttal arguments. 6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to draft an impartial summary in accordance with Elections Code § 9280 and to submit that to the City Clerk for transmittal to the Registrar of Voters no later than the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure. 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo and to the County Clerk of the County of San Mateo. MAYOR I,ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF BURLINGAME MEASURE Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to affirm and continue a transient occupancy tax rate of ten percent(10%)on the rent charged hotel guests within the City of Burlingame be adopted? A-1 EXHIBIT B Measure : Text of Proposed Ordinance This ordinance is proposed by the City Council of the City of Burlingame and continues a transient occupancy tax rate of ten percent(10%). PROPOSED ORDINANCE THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 4.09.025 is added as follows: 4.09.025 Tax Rate For the privilege of occupancy in any hotel,each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator. Section 2. This ordinance shall be considered adopted on the date that the City Council declares the vote, and shall go into effect ten(10)days thereafter. D:\WP51\FILES\Elections\taxcall.res.wpd B-1 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDERING THE SUBMISSION OF A MEASURE REGARDING THE TAX RATE OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE TAX TO THE VOTERS; DETERMINING THE QUESTION TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS REGARDING THE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE TAX; AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 45-2001 REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 6, 2001 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame raised the general business license tax from $75 per year to $100 per year on July 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court has now decided that any tax imposed by a local agency after November 1986 requires voter approval regardless of any delay in bringing any challenge to the tax; and WHEREAS,the business license tax is an integral part of the City's revenue system; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Burlingame wishes to submit the $100 per year business license tax to the voters of the City for approval pursuant to Elections Code § 9222 and Government Code §§ 53723 and 53724; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A hereto is the exact form of the question to be voted on at the general election, as it is to appear on the ballot; and WHEREAS, Exhibit B hereto is the proposed ordinance for submission to the voters as it would appear in the ballot pamphlet; and WHEREAS, the proposal should be submitted to the voters at the upcoming general election; and WHEREAS, this Resolution has been adopted by at least a two-thirds vote of all 1 members of the City Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: 1. The question to be submitted to the voters at the municipal general election on November 6, 2001, as stated on the ballot is contained in Exhibit A hereto, and the text of the measure being voted on in that question is contained in Exhibit B hereto. 2. The proposed business license tax rate would be at $100 per year for all businesses with the exceptions noted, would be paid by businesses in the City on an annual basis„ and be used for general government purposes of the City. There would be no change in rate, collection, or uses from the current Municipal Code. 3. Resolution No. 45-2001 is hereby amended to request the services of the registrar of voters, request consolidation of elections, and specifying procedures for the consolidated election to include this measure. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to include notice of the measure to be voted on in the notice of election directed by Resolution No. 45-2001. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to do all other things required by law to conduct the election regarding this measure. 5. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 9282 and 9286, the City Clerk is further authorized and directed to establish and publish the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure; select the argument for and the argument against the measure to be printed and distributed to the voters as set forth in Election Code § 9287; enable preparation and submittal of rebuttal arguments as set forth in Elections Code § 9285. The City Council hereby adopts the 2 provisions of Elections Code § 9285(a)with regard to rebuttal arguments. 6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to draft an impartial summary in accordance with Elections Code § 9280 and to submit that to the City Clerk for transmittal to the Registrar of Voters no later than the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure. 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo and to the County Clerk of the County of San Mateo. MAYOR I,ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of 2001,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF BURLINGAME MEASURE Shall the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to affirm and continue a general business license tax rate of$100 per year within the City of Burlingame be adopted? A-1 EXHIBIT B Measure : Text of Proposed Ordinance This ordinance is proposed by the City Council of the City of Burlingame and affirms and continues a business tax rate of$100 per year. PROPOSED ORDINANCE THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 6.08.020 is amended to read as follows: 6.08.020 License taxes The following persons shall pay an annual license tax of$100: a)Every person conducting or carrying on the business consisting of selling any goods,wares and merchandise or commodities,or services,or conducting or carrying on any profession,trade,occupation, calling or business not otherwise specifically taxed by this chapter. b) Every person not having a fixed place of business within the city who engages in business within the city, including contractors. c) Every person conducting a home occupation as defined by Section 25.08.350 of this code. d)Every person conducting or carrying on the business of selling Christmas trees,except where such business is conducted in connection with another regularly established place of business for which a license has been issued. B-1 Section 2. This ordinance shall be considered adopted on the date that the City Council declares the vote, and shall go into effect ten(10)days thereafter. D:\W P51\FILES\Elections\taxcall2.res.wpd B-2 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDERING THE SUBMISSION OF A MEASURE REGARDING A BUSINESS LICENSE TAX ON OPERATORS OF COMMERCIAL PARKING FACILITIES; DETERMINING THE QUESTION TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS REGARDING THE BUSINESS LICENSE TAX ON OPERATORS OF COMMERCIAL PARKING FACILITIES; AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 45-2001 REGARDING THE NOVEMBER 6, 2001 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS,the City of Burlingame placed a business license tax on airport parking facilities of five percent (5%) of gross receipts in 1992; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court has now decided that any tax imposed by a local agency after November 1986 requires voter approval regardless of any delay in bringing any challenge to the tax; and WHEREAS, large parking facilities have a significant impact on traffic, roadways, and land usage in the City; and WHEREAS, large parking facilities do not contribute sales tax to the community, do not attract users of other businesses that pay sales taxes, and do not generate significant property taxes; and WHEREAS, a reasonable business license tax would provide a fair contribution for community services and impacts; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Burlingame wishes to submit a business license tax on operators of commercial parking facilities to the voters of the City for approval pursuant to Elections Code § 9222 and Government Code §§ 53723 and 53724; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A hereto is the exact form of the question to be voted on at the 1 general election, as it is to appear on the ballot; and WHEREAS, Exhibit B hereto is the proposed ordinance for submission to the voters as it would appear in the ballot pamphlet; and WHEREAS, the proposal should be submitted to the voters at the upcoming general election; and WHEREAS, this Resolution has been adopted by at least a two-thirds vote of all members of the City Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: 1. The question to be submitted to the voters at the municipal general election on November 6, 2001, as stated on the ballot is contained in Exhibit A hereto, and the text of the measure being voted on in that question is contained in Exhibit B hereto. 2. The proposed business license tax rate would be at five percent (5%0 of gross receipts would be paid by operators of commercial parking facilities in the City on a quarterly basis as defined in the proposed ordinance, and be used for general government purposes of the City. 3. Resolution No. 45-2001 is hereby amended to request the services of the registrar of voters, request consolidation of elections, and specifying procedures for the consolidated election to include this measure. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to include notice of the measure to be voted on in the notice of election directed by Resolution No. 45-2001. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to do all other things required by law to conduct the election regarding this measure. 2 5. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 9282 and 9286, the City Clerk is further authorized and directed to establish and publish the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure; select the argument for and the argument against the measure to be printed and distributed to the voters as set forth in Election Code § 9287; enable preparation and submittal of rebuttal arguments as set forth in Elections Code § 9285. The City Council hereby adopts the provisions of Elections Code § 9285(a) with regard to rebuttal arguments. 6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to draft an impartial summary in accordance with Elections Code § 9280 and to submit that to the City Clerk for transmittal to the Registrar of Voters no later than the last date for submittal of arguments for and against the measure. 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo and to the County Clerk of the County of San Mateo. MAYOR I,ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of 2001,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF BURLINGAME MEASURE Shall the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to establish a business license tax of five percent of gross receipts on operators of commercial parking facilities within the City of Burlingame be adopted? A-1 EXHIBIT B Measure_: Text of Proposed Ordinance This ordinance is proposed by the City Council of the City of Burlingame to establish a business license tax of five percent on operators of commercial parking facilities. PROPOSED ORDINANCE THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 6.08.085 is adopted to read as follows: 6.08.085 Operators of commercial parking facilities (a) Commercial parking facility defined. "Commercial parking facility" means any privately owned or operated facility that provides, for any form of consideration, parking or storage for motor vehicles,motorcycles,trailers,bicycles,or other similar means of conveyance for passengers or property. "Commercial parking facility"does not include any parking facility that is: (i) Not the predominant use of the parcel on which the parking facility is located; or (ii) Leased or owned by a business and operated exclusively to park or store vehicles, motorcycles,trailers,bicycles or other similar conveyances that are owned or leased by that same business. (b)Operator defined. "Operator"means any person who,as owner,lessee,employee,agent,or otherwise,operates,maintains,manages,keeps,permits,or allows to be operated,maintained,managed, or keep any commercial parking facility in or upon any premises owned, leased,managed,operated,or B-i VERSION 1 controlled by such person within the city. (c)The operator of a commercial parking facility in the city shall pay an annual license tax of five percent(5%)of the gross receipts received from the operation of the commercial parking facility without deduction therefrom. (d)Each operator of a facility shall,on or before the last day of the month following the close of each calendar quarter, or at the close of any shorter reporting period which may be established by the license collector,make a return to the license collector,on forms provided by the collector of the total tax. At the time the return is filed, the full amount of the tax shall be remitted to the license collector. The license collector may establish shorter reporting periods for any operator if the collector deems it necessary in order to insure timely collection of the tax; and the collector may also require further information in the return.Returns and payments are due immediately upon cessation of business for any reason. Section 2. This ordinance shall be considered adopted on the date that the City Council declares the vote, and shall go into effect ten(10) days thereafter. D:\WP51\FILES\Elections\taxcall3.res.wpd B_2 VERSION 1 EXHIBIT B Measure_: Text of Proposed Ordinance This ordinance is proposed by the City Council of the City of Burlingame to establish a business license tax of five percent on operators of commercial parking facilities. PROPOSED ORDINANCE THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 6.08.085 is adopted to read as follows: 6.08.085 Operators of commercial parking facilities (a) Commercial parking facility defined. "Commercial parking facility" means any privately owned or operated facility that provides, for any form of consideration, parking or storage for motor vehicles,motorcycles,trailers,bicycles,or other similar means of conveyance for passengers or property. (b)Operator defined. "Operator"means any person who,as owner, lessee, employee,agent,or otherwise,operates,maintains,manages,keeps,permits,or allows to be operated,maintained,managed, or keep any commercial parking facility in or upon any premises owned,leased,managed,operated,or controlled by such person within the city. (c)The operator of a commercial parking facility in the city shall pay an annual license tax of five percent(5%)of the gross receipts received from the operation of the commercial parking facility without deduction therefrom. (d)Each operator of a facility shall,on or before the last day of the month following the close of B-1 VERSION 2 each calendar quarter, or at the close of any shorter reporting period which may be established by the license collector,make a return to the license collector,on forms provided by the collector of the total tax. At the time the return is filed, the full amount of the tax shall be remitted to the license collector. The license collector may establish shorter reporting periods for any operator if the collector deems it necessary in order to insure timely collection of the tax; and the collector may also require further information in the return.Returns and payments are due immediately upon cessation of business for any reason. Section 2. This ordinance shall be considered adopted on the date that the City Council declares the vote, and shall go into effect ten(10) days thereafter. D:\W P51\FILES\Elections\taxcall3.res.wpd B-2 VERSION 2 " STAFF REPORT 4. AGENDA BURUNGAME ITEM# 8 a � �,:;o• MTG. %WINED JUNE 4. DATE 7-16-01 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED*/ � '�" BY DATE: July 10,2001 APPROVED FROM: Bob Bell, Human Resources Director BYjr /V d1 suBJECT: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Ein loyees(AFSCME), Local 829 and 2190 Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution approving the three-year labor agreement with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 829 and 2190. These two locals represent non-management miscellaneous employees of the City of Burlingame. BACKGROUND: The AFSCME labor agreements with Local 829 and 2190 expired on June 30, 2001. The City and AFSCME have been meeting over the last several months to negotiate the terms of a new agreement. Staff has also met in closed session with the City Council to discuss negotiations and get Council authorization for settlement offers. Based on these meetings and City Council direction, the City has reached tentative agreements with both locals of AFSCME. The agreement provides for improvements in both salary and benefits over the next three years. The new salary plan, effective June 18, 2001, is included as Exhibit A with this report. An overview of the significant changes are as follows: ❑ A 10% salary increase retroactive to 06/18/01 for the majority of classifications represented by AFSCME. In addition to the general wage increase, equity adjustments to bring classifications to the market median were made to twenty-six of the fifty-eight positions within the two units. The average equity adjustment was 5.10%. Based on the fact the group was coming out of a five-year contract and no equity study was done during the term, it was anticipated that a significant increase would be warranted. The City and Union conducted a salary survey of agencies within San Mateo County. In order to keep the classifications within the two units at the market median during the first year of the contract,the 10% general increase and recommended equity adjustments need to be granted. In subsequent years of the contract, increases will be based on the amount necessary to place the group third (3th) in the relative survey market. This is in keeping with the City's goal to attract candidates to the City while retaining its talented workforce. ❑ Effective January 1, 2002, the City will adopt the single-highest year California Public Employees Retirement System(CaIPERS) benefit enhancement. This benefit will change the final pay used in calculating an employee's pension benefit from averaging the three highest consecutive years to using the single-highest year. Again, in looking at what other agencies grant their employees, the City found that over 70% of public agencies within San Mateo County provide the single-highest year benefit. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City shall contract with Ca1PERS to provide the Military Service Credit as Public Service (GC 21024) for the covered group. This is a no-cost plan benefit to the City. It allows employees who had previously served in the military, to purchase these years of service as creditable service towards their Ca1PERS pension. Based on data supplied by an employee, CaIPERS completes an actuarial evaluation and advises the employee the cost of purchasing his/her military service credit. The employee pays for this via normal payroll deductions. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City will contract with Ca1PERS to provide for sick leave conversion as creditable service (GC 20965). This allows members to apply unused sick leave as creditable service to their Ca1PERS retirement. This is a low-cost benefit enhancement that rewards employees who retire from the agency and have managed their sick leave effectively during their employment. a Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to pay up to $580 per month per employee and dependent for medical coverage. This is an increase of $50 per month over the current rate. Based on the new medical rates for the next plan year, this amount will allow employees to maintain adequate coverage while allowing the City to contain costs. a Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to pay $85 per month for employee and dependent dental coverage and $10 per month for vision. o Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to provide life insurance to the extent of$75,000 per employee. Additional details regarding the new agreement are contained in Exhibit B — Tentative Agreement. BUDGET IMPACT: The anticipated cost for this fiscal year is anticipated to be $530,000. For next fiscal year, the cost of this contract is estimated to be $350,000 in salary and benefit enhancements. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit A - Salary Plan Effective 06/18/01 Exhibit B - Tentative Settlement Agreement 1 ' . .. .'i 'y.• .. ... 7 :( u\ ' • 3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING CHANGES TO THE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 2190 AND 829 AND AUTHROIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MEMORANDA ON BEHALF OF THE CITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and conditions of employment as provided by State law; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association have reached agreement on certain changes to be made to the existing terms and conditions of employment and memorandum of understanding between the City and the Association; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public and the employees represented by the Association; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1 . The changes in existing salary of the employees represented by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 as contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in Exhibit B into the Memoranda of Understanding between the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 and the City of Burlingame. MAYOR I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on day of July, 2001 , and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY CLERK CITY( ( ( OF BURL I N G A M E CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNITS 20&30 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A • ' EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-11-01 PAGE 1 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G A100 ADMINISTRATIVE MONTHLY 3994.49 4186.91 4390.92 4601.89 4826.77 SECRETARY BIWEEKLY 1843.61 1932.42 2026.58 2123.95 2227.74 HRLY.RATE 23.05 24.16 25.33 26.55 27.85 A101 BUILDING MAINTENANCE MONTHLY 3690.79 3883.21 4052.45 4261.10 4469.75 WORKER BIWEEKLY 1703.44 1792.25 1870.36 1966.66 2062.96 HRLY.RATE 21.29 22.40 23.38 24.58 25.79 A102 ACCOUNT CLERK III MONTHLY 3806.70 3994.49 4186.91 4395.56 4615.80 BIWEEKLY 1756.94 1843.61 1932.42 2028.72 2130.37 HRLY.RATE 21.96 23.05 24.16 25.36 26.63 A103 ACCOUNTING MONTHLY 3945.80 4133.59 4335.28 4553.21 4785.04 TECHNICIAN BIWEEKLY 1821.14 1907.81 2000.90 2101.48 2208.48 HRLY.RATE 22.76 23.85 25.01 26.27 27.61 A104 ACCOUNT CLERK I MONTHLY 2999.92 3152.93 3310.58 3468.23 3637.47 BIWEEKLY 1384.58 1455.20 1527.96 1600.72 1678.83 HRLY.RATE 17.31 18.19 19.10 20.01 20.99 A105 SECRETARY MONTHLY 3628.19 3815.98 4006.08 4200.82 4404.83 BIWEEKLY 1674.55 1761.22 1848.96 1938.84 2033.00 HRLY.RATE 20.93 22.02 23.11 24.24 25.41 A106 CUSTODIAN MONTHLY 3030.06 3171.48 3324.49 3498.37 3676.88 BIWEEKLY 1398.49 1463.76 1534.38 1614.63 1697.02 HRLY.RATE 17.48 18.30 19.18 20.18 21.21 A107 TYPIST CLERK MONTHLY 2881.69 3030.06 3176.12 3331.45 3507.64 3593.42 BIWEEKLY 1330.01 1398.49 1465.90 1537.59 1618.91 1658.50 HRLY.RATE 16.63 17.48 18.32 19.22 20.24 20.73 A108 PLANNER MONTHLY 4903.28 5146.70 5408.67 5659.05 5948.84 BIWEEKLY 2263.05 2375.40 2496.31 2611.87 2745.62 HRLY.RATE 28.29 29.69 31.20 32.65 34.32 A110 ZONING TECHNICIAN MONTHLY 4182.27 4383.97 4604.21 4840.68 5070.20 BIWEEKLY 1930.28 2023.37 2125.02 2234.16 2340.09 HRLY.RATE 24.13 25.29 26.56 27.93 29.25 8160 ACCOUNT CLERK II MONTHLY 3310.58 3468.23 3637.47 3806.70 3994.49 BIWEEKLY 1527.96 1600.72 1678.83 1756.94 1843.61 HRLY.RATE 19.10 20.01 20.99 21.96 23.05 1 A200 PARKING METER MONTHLY 3498.37 3676.88 3848.43 4038.54 4237.91 SERVICE WORKER BIWEEKLY 1614.63 1697.02 1776.20 1863.94 1955.96 HRLY.RATE 20.18 21.21 22.20 23.30 24.45 A201 PARKING ENFORCEMENT MONTHLY 3222.48 3375.49 3542.41 3718.61 3906.39 I OFFICER BIWEEKLY 1487.30 1557.92 1634.96 1716.28 1802.95 HRLY.RATE 18.59 19.47 20.44 21.45 22.54 A202 POLICE CLERK I MONTHLY 2999.92 3152.93 3310.58 3468.23 3637.47 BIWEEKLY 1384.58 1455.20 1527.96 1600.72 1678.83 HRLY.RATE 17.31 18.19 19.10 20.01 20.99 A203 POLICE CLERK II MONTHLY 3310.58 3468.23 3637.47 3806.70 3994.49 BIWEEKLY 1527.96 1600.72 1678.83 1756.94 1843.61 HRLY.RATE 19.10 20.01 20.99 21.96 23.05 A204 POLICE CLERK III MONTHLY 4592.62 BIWEEKLY 2119.67 HRLY.RATE 26.50 A301 EMERGENCY MONTHLY 4147.50 4344.56 4560.16 4789.68 5026.15 PREPAREDNESS/FIRE BIWEEKLY 1914.23 2005.18 2104.69 2210.62 2319.76 EDUCATION SPECIALIST HRLY.RATE 23.93 25.06 26.31 27.63 29.00 , - ....—..s, ,--...sk ,-. CITY OF BURLINGAME CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNITS 20 & 30 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-11-01 PAGE 2 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G A400 PERSONNEL ASSISTANT MONTHLY 3945.80 4133.59 4335.28 4553.21 4785.04 BIWEEKLY 1821 .14 1907.81 2000.90 2101 .48 2208.48 HRLY.RATE 22.76 23.85 25.01 26.27 27.61 A600 SENIOR CIVIL MONTHLY 6880.81 7216.97 7574.00 7965.79 8346.00 ENGINEER BIWEEKLY 3175.76 3330.91 3495.69 3676.52 3852.00 HRLY.RATE 39.70 41 .64 43.70 45.96 48.15 A601 TRAFFIC-CIVIL MONTHLY 5397.08 5654.42 5948.84 6252.55 6560.88 ENGINEER BIWEEKLY 2490.96 2609.73 2745.62 2885.79 3028.10 HRLY.RATE 31 .14 32.62 34.32 36.07 37.85 A602 SENIOR BUILDING MONTHLY 5459.68 5728.60 6004.48 6319.78 6637.39 INSPECTOR BIWEEKLY 2519.85 2643.97 2771 .30 2916.82 3063.41 HRLY.RATE 31 .50 33.05 34.64 36.46 38.29 A603 BUILDING INSPECTOR MONTHLY 4863.86 5098.02 5359.99 5617.32 5886.25 BIWEEKLY 2244.86 2352.93 2473.84 2592.61 2716.73 HRLY.RATE 28.06 29.41 30.92 32.41 33.96 A604 ENGINEERING MONTHLY 4128.95 4337.60 4560.16 4778.09 5019.19 TECHNICIAN II BIWEEKLY 1905.67 2001 .97 2104.69 2205.27 2316.55 HRLY.RATE 23.82 25.02 26.31 27.57 28.96 A605 ASSISTANT ENGINEER MONTHLY 5149.02 5397.08 5654.42 5948.84 6252.55 BIWEEKLY 2376.47 2490.96 2609.73 2745.62 2885.79 HRLY.RATE 29.71 31 .14 32.62 34.32 36.07 A606 JUNIOR ENGINEER MONTHLY 4671 .44 4896.32 5149.02 5397.08 5654.42 BIWEEKLY 2156.05 2259.84 2376.47 2490.96 2609.73 HRLY.RATE 26.95 28.25 29.71 31 .14 32.62 A607 SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS MONTHLY 5390.13 5659.05 5937.25 6220.09 6549.29 INSPECTOR BIWEEKLY 2487.75 2611 .87 2740.27 2870.81 3022.75 HRLY.RATE 31 .10 32.65 34.25 35.89 37.78 A608 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER MONTHLY 5659.05 5937.25 6220.09 6549.29 6878.50 BIWEEKLY 2611 .87 2740.27 2870.81 3022.75 3174.69 HRLY.RATE 32.65 34.25 35.89 37.78 39.68 A609 PERMIT TECHNICIAN MONTHLY 3855.39 4050.13 4254.14 4460.47 4685.35 BIWEEKLY 1779.41 1869.29 1963.45 2058.68 2162.47 HRLY.RATE 22.24 23.37 24.54 25.73 27.03 A610 PROJECT MANAGER/GIS MONTHLY 7221 .61 COORDINATOR BIWEEKLY 3333.05 HRLY.RATE 41 .66 A670 SENIOR TYPIST CLERK MONTHLY 3155.25 3298.99 3463.59 3639.78 3809.02 BIWEEKLY 1456.27 1522.61 1598.58 1679.90 1758.01 HRLY.RATE 18.20 19.03 19.98 21 .00 21 .98 A701 RECREATION MONTHLY 3781 .20 3964.35 4154.45 4360.79 4571 .75 COORDINATOR BIWEEKLY 1745.17 1829.70 1917.44 2012.67 2110.04 HRLY.RATE 21 .81 22.87 23.97 25.16 26.38 A705 BUILDING ATTENDANT MONTHLY 2418.02 2533.94 2668.40 2800.55 2937.33 BIWEEKLY 1116.01 1169.51 1231 .57 1292.56 1355.69 HRLY.RATE 13.95 14.62 15.39 16.16 16.95 A800 LIBRARIAN II MONTHLY 4226.32 4439.61 4652.90 4884.73 5135.11 BIWEEKLY 1950.61 2049.05 2147.49 2254.49 2370.05 HRLY.RATE 24.38 25.61 26.84 28.18 29.63 A801 LIBRARIAN I MONTHLY 3839.16 4024.63 4212.41 4428.02 4638.99 BIWEEKLY 1771 .92 1857.52 1944.19 2043.70 2141 .07 HRLY.RATE 22.15 23.22 24.30 25.55 26.76 i 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNITS 20 & 30 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A 4 EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-11 -01 PAGE 3 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G A802 LIBRARY ASSISTANT MONTHLY 3662.97 3827.57 4031 .58 4230.96 4430.34 III BIWEEKLY 1690.60 1766.57 1860.73 1952.75 2044.77 HRLY.RATE 21 .13 22.08 23.26 24.41 25.56 A803 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II MONTHLY 3282.76 3431 .13 3611 .96 3776.57 3959.71 4059.40 BIWEEKLY 1515.12 1583.60 1667.06 1743.03 1827.56 1873.57 HRLY.RATE 18.94 19.80 20.84 21 .79 22.84 23.42 A804 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I MONTHLY 2941 .97 3092.66 3247.99 3396.36 3574.87 3667.60 BIWEEKLY 1357.83 1427.38 1499.07 1567.55 1649.94 1692.74 HRLY.RATE 16.97 17.84 18.74 19.59 20.62 21 .16 37 records listed. `1 '"•\ I CITY OF BURL I N GAM E CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNIT 80 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-11-01 PAGE 1 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G S401 PARK LEADWORKER - MONTHLY 3789.83 3975.95 4175.54 4386.33 4610.58 LANDSCAPE BIWEEKLY 1749.15 1835.06 1927.17 2024.46 2127.96 HRLY.RATE 21 .86 22.94 24.09 25.31 26.60 S402 TREE TRIMMER MONTHLY 3614.91 3789.83 3975.95 4175.54 4386.33 BIWEEKLY 1668.42 1749.15 1835.06 1927.17 2024.46 HRLY.RATE 20.86 21 .86 22.94 24.09 25.31 S403 GROUNDS EQUIPMENT MONTHLY 3677.70 3850.37 4038.74 4238.33 4451 .36 REPAIR WORKER BIWEEKLY 1697.40 1777.10 1864.04 1956.15 2054.48 HRLY.RATE 21 .22 22.21 23.30 24.45 25.68 S404 IRRIGATION REPAIR MONTHLY 3677.70 3850.37 4038.74 4238.33 4451 .36 SPECIALIST BIWEEKLY 1697.40 1777.10 1864.04 1956.15 2054.48 HRLY.RATE 21 .22 22.21 23.30 24.45 25.68 S405 TREE LEADWORKER MONTHLY 4032.02 4236.08 4446.88 4677.86 4908.83 BIWEEKLY 1860.93 1955.12 2052.41 2159.01 2265.62 HRLY.RATE 23.26 24.44 25.66 26.99 28.32 S406 PARK MAINTENANCE MONTHLY 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 4215.90 WORKER II BIWEEKLY 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 1945.80 HRLY.RATE 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 24.32 S407 PARK MAINTENANCE MONTHLY 3316.66 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 WORKER I BIWEEKLY 1530.77 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 HRLY.RATE 19.13 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 S408 PARK LEADWORKER - MONTHLY 4157.60 4366.15 4585.91 4819.13 5059.08 MAINTENANCE BIWEEKLY 1918.89 2015.15 2116.58 2224.22 2334.96 HRLY.RATE 23.99 25.19 26.46 27.80 29.19 S411 TREE WORKER MONTHLY 3666.49 3841 .40 4032.02 4233.84 4446.88 BIWEEKLY 1692.23 1772.96 1860.93 1954.08 2052.41 HRLY.RATE 21 .15 22.16 23.26 24.43 25.66 S501 WATER MAINTENANCE MONTHLY 3960.26 4157.60 4366.15 4585.91 4819.13 LEADWORKER BIWEEKLY 1827.81 1918.89 2015.15 2116.58 2224.22 HRLY.RATE 22.85 23.99 25.19 26.46 27.80 S502 WATER METER REPAIRER MONTHLY 3502.79 3668.73 3845.89 4036.50 4238.33 BIWEEKLY 1616.67 1693.26 1775.03 1863.00 1956.15 HRLY.RATE 20.21 21 .17 22.19 23.29 24.45 S503 MAINTENANCE WORKER MONTHLY 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 4215.90 BIWEEKLY 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 1945.80 HRLY.RATE 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 24.32 S504 WATER METER READER MONTHLY 3318.90 3502.79 3668.73 3845.89 4036.50 BIWEEKLY 1531 .80 1616.67 1693.26 1775.03 1863.00 HRLY.RATE 19.15 20.21 21 .17 22.19 23.29 S505 WATER SERVICE WORKER MONTHLY 3502.79 3668.73 3845.89 4036.50 4238.33 BIWEEKLY 1616.67 1693.26 1775.03 1863.00 1956.15 HRLY.RATE 20.21 21 .17 22.19 23.29 24.45 S506 LABORER MONTHLY 3316.66 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 BIWEEKLY 1530.77 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 HRLY.RATE 19.13 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 S601 STREET & SEWER MONTHLY 3789.83 3975.95 4175.54 4386.33 4610.58 LEADWORKER BIWEEKLY 1749.15 1835.06 1927.17 2024.46 2127.96 HRLY.RATE 21 .86 22.94 24.09 25.31 26.60 S602 TRAFFIC SIGN & PAINT MONTHLY 3832.43 4018.56 4215.90 4428.94 4650.95 LEADWORKER BIWEEKLY 1768.82 1854.72 1945.80 2044.13 2146.59 HRLY.RATE 22.11 23.18 24.32 25.55 26.83 "1 CITY OF BURL I N GAM E CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNIT 80 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A 4 EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-11-01 PAGE 2 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G S603 STREET SWEEPER MONTHLY 3518.48 3695.64 3877.28 4074.62 4274.21 OPERATOR BIWEEKLY 1623.92 1705.68 1789.52 1880.60 1972.71 HRLY.RATE 20.30 21 .32 22.37 23.51 24.66 S604 MAINTENANCE WORKER MONTHLY 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 4215.90 BIWEEKLY 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 1945.80 HRLY.RATE 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 24.32 S605 LABORER MONTHLY 3316.66 3469.15 3659.76 3832.43 4018.56 BIWEEKLY 1530.77 1601 .15 1689.12 1768.82 1854.72 HRLY.RATE 19.13 20.01 21 .11 22.11 23.18 S606 MAINTENANCE MONTHLY 4529.85 4754.10 4994.05 5245.21 5512.07 ELECTRICIAN BIWEEKLY 2090.70 2194.20 2304.95 2420.87 2544.03 HRLY.RATE 26.13 27.43 28.81 30.26 31 .80 S607 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC MONTHLY 4038.74 4238.33 4451 .36 4675.61 4913.32 BIWEEKLY 1864.04 1956.15 2054.48 2157.98 2267.69 HRLY.RATE 23.30 24.45 25.68 26.97 28.35 S609 ASSISTANT AUTOMOTIVE MONTHLY 3623.88 3794.31 3978.20 4175.54 4386.33 MECHANIC BIWEEKLY 1672.56 1751 .22 1836.09 1927.17 2024.46 HRLY.RATE 20.91 21 .89 22.95 24.09 25.31 S610 PUMP STATION MONTHLY 3789.83 3975.95 4175.54 4386.33 4610.58 LEADWORKER BIWEEKLY 1749.15 1835.06 1927.17 2024.46 2127.96 HRLY.RATE 21 .86 22.94 24.09 25.31 26.60 24 records listed. r \ '••"\ Exhibit B Comprehensive Tentative Agreement American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 829 and 2190 and The City of BurlinEame 1 . Term — 3 year term (July 1 , 2001 thru June 30, 2004) 2. Wages a) General Wage Increase effective June 18, 2001 The City agrees to provide equity adjustments and general wage increases per exhibit A. b) Salary Adjustments in Year 2 and 3 Effective 07/01/02, the City agrees to give a 5% general wage increase. Effective 09/01 /02 an additional adjustment will be made to bring the Unit to third in the market median of comparator agencies. Effective 07/01/03, the City agrees to give a 3% general wage increase. Effective 09/01/02 an additional adjustment will be made to bring the Unit to third in the market median of comparator agencies. c) Premium Pay Bilingual Pay Effective January 1 , 2002, the City agrees to provide a $ 100 per month differential to employees who are fluent in a second language deemed necessary by the department. Employees designated as bilingual service providers will be required to pass a fluency certification test prior to receiving the differential. 3 . Retirement a) One Year Final Compensation (GC Section 20042) - The City will amend its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the one year final compensation benefit effective January 1 , 2002. b) Service Credit for Accrued Sick Leave (GC Section 20965) - The City will amend its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the sick leave conversion to credible service effective January 1 , 2002. The City 1 agrees to provide this benefit as a way of recognizing employees that have effectively managed their sick leave while employed with the City. c) Military Buy Back (GC Section 21024) - The City will amend its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the employee option of purchasing military service as creditable service towards the CalPERS retirement plan. 4. Benefit Plans a) Health Plans - Effective 01/01/02 —the City agrees to pay up to $580 per month towards employee medical. - Effective 01/01/03 —the City agrees to pay up to $630 per month towards employee medical. - Effective 01/01/04—the City agrees to pay up to $705 per month toward employee medical. b) Dental/Vision Plans 1. Effective 01/01/02 —the City agrees to pay$85 per month per employee for employee and dependent coverage for Dental and $10 per month per employee for Vision. - Effective 01/01/03 -the City will increase the contribution towards dental and vision plans by the April '01 —April '02 Consumer Price Index for Bay Area Urban Wage Earners. - Effective 01/01/04 -the City will increase the contribution towards dental and vision plans by the April '02 —April '03 Consumer Price Index for Bay Area Urban Wage Earners. c) Life Insurance 1. Effective 01/01/02, the City can agree to provide life insurance coverage of Seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) for members of the bargaining unit. Effective 01/01/02,the City will also provide for voluntary, employee-paid additional life insurance coverage through its group plan. This optional benefit will be paid for by employees via regular payroll deductions. d) Deferred Compensation Effective 07/01/01, the City will the match an employee's contribution to the deferred compensation plan up to $30 per pay period. 2 e) SDI Effective 01/01/02, the City can agree to begin the practice of integrating sick leave with California State Disability Insurance(SDI) when employees in this Unit are on approved sick leave. The integration will begin effective the first day the employee is eligible for state disability benefits. f) IRS 125 —Plan Effectrive 01/01/02, the City will offer Section 125 benefit plans for medical and dependent daycare reimbursement. 5. Benefits for permanent part-time employees a) The City will provide a prorated accrual rates based on years of service. b) Provide Life Insurance coverage of$35,000. 6. Leaves and Time Off a) The City will halt the practice of stopping accruals after two(2)pay periods while on an approved disability leave. The City will stop accruals when an employee goes on an unpaid status and remains eligible for additional leave time. b) The City will allow a maximum of 130 hours of compensatory time for both units of AFSCME. 7. Vacation Requests The City can agree to provide guidelines that ensure employees will receive responses to vacation requests within 10 working days. 8. Labor-Management Issues a) Pay-for-Performance Program During the term of this agreement the City plans on developing a Performance Recognition Plan. It is the City's intention to involve a cross-section of employees in this process. The City will meet and confer with the Union on any recommendations. 9. Reclassification Process The City will agree to finalize the draft reclassification process no later than January 1, 2002. 3 Local 829- Professional and Occupational Proposals 1. The City will agree to incorporate the Engineer Registration differential payments into the MOU. The City has researched special payments and those are addressed below: 2. The City will agree to provide $100 per certificate up to a maximum of$300 for the following certifications: Building Inspector Combination Inspector Plans Examiner 3. The City agrees to change the holiday pay to be equal to that in the Local 2190 contract. 4. Effective January 1, 2002,the City agrees to raise the uniform allowance for police department employees $25 per contract year. Local 2190 - Professional and Occupational Proposals 1. Effective January 1, 2001 the City will agree to provide $100 a month differential for employees that are required to maintain a class B or class A license. 2. Effective January 1, 2002,the City will agree to increase the boot allowance to $180 per year. The City will increase the boot allowance$10 each consecutive year of the contract. 3. Effective July 1, 2001 the City can agrees to provide $75 per month for the following certifications: - Water Distribution Operator Grade D2 - Water Distribution Operator Grade D3 Effective July 1, 2001 the City can agree to provide 5% assignment pay for employees assigned to back flow device inspection. 4. Park Leadworker Maintenance—Landscape (Pesticide recommendations) The City will agree to provide a 5% differential to employees assigned to serve as agricultural Pest Control Advisor(PCA). 4 5. Park Leadworker- Landscape The City will agree to provide a 5% differential to employees assigned to serve as Certified Playground Inspector (CPI). 6 Tree Crew Effective July 1, 2001, the City will agree to increase the climbing boot allowance to $300 per year. The City will increase the boot allowance $10 each consecutive year of the contract. Effective July 1, 2001 the City agrees to reimburse Tree Workers for three pairs of heavy denim pants per year or purchase three pairs of heavy denim pants per year if available from the City's current vendor. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 75-2001 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING CHANGES TO THE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 2190 AND 829 AND AUTHROTZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MEMORANDA ON BEHALF OF THE CITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and conditions of employment as provided by State law; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association have reached agreement on certain changes to be made to the existing terms and conditions of employment and memorandum of understanding between the City and the Association; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public and the employees represented by the Association; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The changes in existing salary of the employees represented by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 as contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in Exhibit B into the Memoranda of Understanding between the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 2190 and 829 and the City of Burlingame. Y4.-- V4Aort-*„.I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 16th day of July, 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: JANNEY /J - d2 �v CITY CLERK 4 CITY AlnrijA% BURLINGAME i .,ii, i l l h�: \4POPPTED (� e of t l ~ DATE: July 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FR: Bob Bell, Human Resources Director Of RE: Correction to Exhibit B of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 829 and 2190 Staff Report Attached is a corrected version of Exhibit B of the AFSCME staff report that is on the July 16, 2001 Consent Calendar. The correction pertains to the monthly differential provided for the Water Grade Distribution Operator certifications. The amount agreed to was$100, not$75 a month as documented on page 4 of the original exhibit Local 829 - Professional and Occupational Proposals 1 The City will agree to incorporate the Engineer Registration differential payments into the MOL. The City has researched special payments and those are addressed below: 2. The City will agree to provide $100 per certificate up to a maximum of$300 for the following certifications: Building Inspector Combination Inspector Plans Examiner 3. The City agrees to change the holiday pay to be equal to that in the Local 2190 contract. 4. Effective January 1, 2002,the City agrees to raise the uniform allowance for police department employees $25 per contract year. Local 2190 - Professional and Occupational Proposals 1. Effective January 1, 2001 the City will agree to provide $100 a month differential for employees that are required to maintain a class B or class A license. 2. Effective January 1, 2002,the City will agree to increase the boot allowance to $180 per year. The City will increase the boot allowance $10 each consecutive year of the contract. 3. Effective July 1, 2001 the City can agrees to provide $100 per month for the following certifications: - Water Distribution Operator Grade D2 - Water Distribution Operator Grade D3 Effective July 1, 2001 the City can agree to provide 5% assignment pay for employees assigned to back flow device inspection. 4. Park Leadworker Maintenance—Landscape(Pesticide recommendations) The City will agree to provide a 5% differential to employees assigned to serve as agricultural Pest Control Advisor(PCA). 4 Local 829-Professional and Occupational Proposals 1. The City will agree to incorporate the Engineer Registration differential payments into the MOU. The City has researched special payments and those are addressed below: 2. The City will agree to provide$100 per certificate up to a maximum of$300 for the following certifications: Building Inspector Combination Inspector Plans Examiner 3. The City agrees to change the holiday pay to be equal to that in the Local 2190 contract. 4. Effective January 1,2002,the City agrees to raise the uniform allowance for police department employees$25 per contract year. Local 2190-Professional and Occupational Proposals 1. Effective January 1,2001 the City will agree to provide$100 a month differential for employees that are required to maintain a class B or class A license. 2. Effective January 1,2002,the City will agree to increase the boot allowance to $180 per year. The City will increase the boot allowance$10 each consecutive year of the contract. 3. Effective July 1,2001 the City can agrees to provide$100 per month for the following certifications: -Water Distribution Operator Grade D2 -Water Distribution Operator Grade D3 Effective July 1,2001 the City can agree to provide 5%assignment pay for employees assigned to back flow device inspection. 4. Park Leadworker Maintenance—Landscape(Pesticide recommendations) The City will agree to provide a 5%differential to employees assigned to serve as agricultural Pest Control Advisor(PCA). 4 4 CITY „1/4•AMMIIO� BURLINGAME 7`, is int vic,,_:,—,./EO cGite fit7 °/A14497' Vntezi 'ce CJ - DATE: July 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FR Bob Bell, Human Resources Director W RE: Correction to Exhibit B of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 829 and 2190 Staff Report Attached is a corrected version of Exhibit B of the AFSCME staff report that is on the July 16, 2001 Consent Calendar. The correction pertains to the monthly differential provided for the Water Grade Distribution Operator certifications. The amount agreed to was$100, not$75 a month as documented on page 4 of the original exhibit. CIT7 �� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA � � � , . . . , ITEM # b MTG. \OAATED 5r„. DATE 7-16-01 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY &4 DATE: July 10, 2001 APPROVE di yAr FROM: Jim Nantell, CityManager BY /ttV SUBJECT: Burlingame Association of Middle Managers (BAMM) Ag •ement RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution approving the three and one-half (3 %2) year labor agreement with the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers (BAMM). This unit represents the miscellaneous management employees of the City of Burlingame. BACKGROUND: The BAMM labor agreement expired on June 30, 2001 . The City and BAMM have been meeting over the last several months to negotiate the terms of a new agreement. Staff has also met in closed session with the City Council to discuss negotiations and get Council authorization for settlement offers. Based on these meetings and City Council direction, the City has reached a tentative agreement with BAMM. The agreement provides for improvements in both salary and benefits over the next three and one-half years. The new salary plan, effective June 18, 2001, is included as Exhibit A with this report. An overview of the significant changes are as follows: ❑ A 13% salary increase retroactive to 06/18/01 for the majority of classifications represented by BAMM. In addition to the general wage increase, three classifications are being given a 5.7% equity adjustment to bring them to the market median. Two positions are also being reclassified. They include the Billing and Collections Supervisor and one of the Librarian III classifications. The scope of duties of the Billing and Collections Supervisor have been expanded to include management and coordination of the City's technology services. Similarly, the Librarian III position being reclassed has evolved into the technical service provider for the City's main library. The BAMM group's previous contract was for five years and no formal equity study was conducted during the life of contract. Therefore, it was expected that a large increase would be given to the group to get them aligned with the survey market. The recommended increases will keep them above or at the market median during the first year of the contract. This will aid the City's efforts in attracting and retaining employees in this group. In the subsequent years of the contract, the City will conduct a salary survey and move the unit to third in the market median. ❑ Effective January 1, 2002, the City will adopt the single highest year California Public Employees Retirement System (Ca1PERS) benefit enhancement. This benefit will change the final pay used in calculating an employee's pension benefit from averaging the three highest consecutive years to using the single highest year. Providing this benefit enhancement is in conformance with other Cities in San Mateo County. Seventy percent (70%) of agencies surveyed provide single highest year to their miscellaneous employee group. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City shall contract with Ca1PERS to provide the Military Service Credit as Public Service (GC 21024) for the covered group. This is a no cost enhancement for the City. Employees that have served in the military may purchase their years of service from Ca1PERS. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City will contract with Ca1PERS to provide for sick leave conversion as creditable service (GC 20965). This allows members to apply unused sick leave as creditable service to their Ca1PERS retirement. o Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to pay up to $580 per month per employee and dependent for medical coverage. This represents a$50 per month increase towards medical coverage. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to pay$85 per month towards dental for employee and dependent coverage. - Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to pay$10 per month towards vision for employee and dependent coverage. o The term of this agreement is 3 and 1/2 (3 %2) years. It will be effective July 1, 2001 through December 12, 2004. o Annually during the term of the contract the City will provide salary and health costs adjustments that will place the compensation such that we will continue keep our employees at or above the medium of San Mateo County market cities. However, if the City experienced a significant reversal in revenues (reduction of 10% or more) the City will be able to re-open the contract regarding compensation. o Discontinue the practice of allowing salaried managers to be able to accrue compensatory time off at a time and half rate. Instead we have increased annual administrative leave from 40 to 60 hours for most classifications and 80 hours for Recreation and some Public Works managers. Although that represents an increase of 20 to 40 hours a year in admin leave it eliminates compensatory time off that in some cases was well over two hundred hours a year. Additional details regarding the new agreement are contained in Exhibit B—Memorandum of Understanding. BUDGET IMPACT: The anticipated cost for this fiscal year is anticipated to be $297,000. In the next fiscal year, the cost is anticipated to be approximately$165,000. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit A - Salary Plan Effective 06/18/01 Exhibit B—Memorandum of Understanding RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING CHANGES TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE BURLINGAME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE MANAGERS AND AUTHROIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MEMORNADUM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and conditions of employment as provided by State law; and WHEREAS,the City and the Association have reached agreement on certain changes to be made to the existing terms and conditions of employment and memorandum of understanding between the City and the Association; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public and the employees represented by the Association; NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The changes in existing salary of the employees represented by the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers as contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in Exhibit B into the Memorandum of Understanding between the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers and the City of Burlingame. MAYOR I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on day of July, 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY CLERK CCITY OF BURLINGAME CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNIT 35 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-10-01 PAGE 1 . . SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G B 100 EMP. &BENEFITS MONTHLY 5285.80 5554.73 5816.70 6118.08 6424.10 ADMINISTRATOR BIWEEKLY 2439.60 2563.72 2684.63 2823.73 2964.97 HRLY.RATE 30.50 32.05 33.56 35.30 37.06 0101 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT MONTHLY 5654.42 5921.02 6234.00 6535.38 6866.90 BIWEEKLY 2609.73 2732.78 2877.23 3016.33 3169.34 HRLY.RATE 32.62 34.16 35.97 37.70 39.62 8102 ACCOUNTANT MONTHLY 4910.23 5162.93 5401.72 5684.55 5969.71 • BIWEEKLY 2266.26 2382.89 2493.10 2623.64 2755.25 HRLY.RATE 28.33 29.79 31.16 32.80 34.44 0103 BILLING& MONTHLY 5285.80 5554.73 5816.70 6118.08 6424.10 COLLECTIONS BIWEEKLY 2439.60 2563.72 2684.63 2823.73 2964.97 SUPERVISOR HRLY.RATE 30.50 32.05 33.56 35.30 37.06 B 104 FINANCIAL SERVICE MONTHLY 6152.86 6493.65 6818.22 7159.01 7518.36 MANAGER BIWEEKLY 2839.78 2997.07 3146.87 3304.16 3470.01 HRLY.RATE 35.50 37.46 39.34 41.30 43.38 6105 ADMINISTRATIVE/INFOR MONTHLY 5830.61 6131.99 6431.06 6755.62 7108.01 MATION SERVICES MGR BIWEEKLY 2691.05 2830.15 2968.18 3117.98 3280.62 HRLY.RATE 33.64 35.38 37.10 38.97 41.01 B110 SENIOR PLANNER MONTHLY 6298.91 6609.57 6948.05 7267.98 7641.23 BIWEEKLY 2907.19 3050.57 3206.79 3354.45 3526.72 HRLY.RATE 36.34 38.13 40.08 41.93 44.08 8410 PARKS SUPERINTENDENT MONTHLY 6164.45 6482.06 6797.35 7140.47 7513.72 BIWEEKLY 2845.13 2991.72 3137.24 3295.60 3467.87 HRLY.RATE 35.56 37.40 39.22 41.20 43.35 0420 PARKS SUPERVISOR MONTHLY 5044.69 5304.35 5568.64 5846.84 6208.50 BIWEEKLY 2328.32 2448.16 2570.14 2698.54 2865.46 HRLY.RATE 29.10 30.60 32.13 33.73 35.82 0430 CITY ARBORIST MONTHLY 5167.57 5434.17 5703.10 5988.26 6359.19 BIWEEKLY 2385.03 2508.08 2632.20 2763.81 2935.01 HRLY.RATE 29.81 31.35 32.90 34.55 36.69 0500 ASSISTANT WATER MONTHLY 5452.72 5728.60 6009.12 6322.10 6644.34 SUPERINTENDENT BIWEEKLY 2516.64 2643.97 2773.44 2917.89 3066.62 HRLY.RATE 31.46 33.05 34.67 36.47 38.33 8501 WATER SUPERVISOR MONTHLY 4657.53 4896.32 5139.75 5397.08 5728.60 BIWEEKLY 2149.63 2259.84 2372.19 2490.96 2643.97 HRLY.RATE 26.87 28.25 29.65 31.14 33.05 B600 ASST. DIRECTOR OF MONTHLY 8322.82 8742.44 9166.69 9634.99 10117.21 PUBLIC WORKS BIWEEKLY 3841.30 4034.97 4230.78 4446.92 4669.48 HRLY.RATE 48.02 50.44 52.88 55.59 58.37 8602 CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY 7926.38 8325.14 8728.53 9175.96 9634.99 BIWEEKLY 3658.33 3842.37 4028.55 4235.06 4446.92 HRLY.RATE 45.73 48.03 50.36 52.94 55.59 8603 PUBLIC WORKS MONTHLY 7073.24 7418.67 7794.24 8176.76 8589.43 SUPERINTENDENT BIWEEKLY 3264.57 3424.00 3597.34 3773.89 3964.35 HRLY.RATE 40.81 42.80 44.97 47.17 49.55 B604 CHIEF BUILDING MONTHLY 7372.30 7733.96 8116.49 8522.19 8939.49 OFFICIAL BIWEEKLY 3402.60 3569.52 3746.07 3933.32 4125.92 HRLY.RATE 42.53 44.62 46.83 49.17 51.57 B605 CITY ELECTRICIAN MONTHLY 5318.26 5561.68 5844.52 6131.99 6442.65 BIWEEKLY 2454.58 2566.93 2697.47 2830.15 2973.53 HRLY.RATE 30.68 32.09 33.72 35.38 37.17 i ''1 1 1 CITY OF BURL I N GAM E CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARIES FOR BARGAINING UNIT 35 (INCLUDES PERS) - EXHIBIT A EFFECTIVE JUNE 18, 2001 DATE 07-10-01 PAGE 2 SALARY.NEW.2001 TITLE UNIT A B C D E F G B606 FLEET MANAGER MONTHLY 5213.93 5452.72 5728.60 6011 .44 6315.14 BIWEEKLY 2406.43 2516.64 2643.97 2774.51 2914.68 HRLY.RATE 30.08 31 .46 33.05 34.68 36.43 B607 ASSISTANT STREET & MONTHLY 5452.72 5728.60 6009.12 6322.10 6644.34 SEWER SUPERINTENDENT BIWEEKLY 2516.64 2643.97 2773.44 2917.89 3066.62 HRLY.RATE 31 .46 33.05 34.67 36.47 38.33 B608 STREET & SEWER MONTHLY 4657.53 4896.32 5139.75 5397.08 5728.60 SUPERVISOR BIWEEKLY 2149.63 2259.84 2372.19 2490.96 2643.97 HRLY.RATE 26.87 28.25 29.65 31 .14 33.05 B609 DEPUTY CHIEF MONTHLY 7205.38 BUILDING OFFICIAL BIWEEKLY 3325.56 HRLY.RATE 41 .57 B700 RECREATION MONTHLY 4910.23 5162.93 5401 .72 5684.55 5969.71 SUPERVISOR BIWEEKLY 2266.26 2382.89 2493.10 2623.64 2755.25 HRLY.RATE 28.33 29.79 31 .16 32.80 34.44 B710 RECREATION MONTHLY 5830.61 6131 .99 6431 .06 6755.62 7108.01 SUPERINTENDENT BIWEEKLY 2691 .05 2830.15 2968.18 3117.98 3280.62 HRLY.RATE 33.64 35.38 37.10 38.97 41 .01 B801 LIBRARIAN III MONTHLY 5002.96 5253.34 5503.72 5791 .20 6071 .72 BIWEEKLY 2309.06 2424.62 2540.18 2672.86 2802.33 HRLY.RATE 28.86 30.31 31 .75 33.41 35.03 B803 LIBRARY CIRCULATION MONTHLY 3943.49 4133.59 4328.33 4548.57 4764.18 SUPERVISOR BIWEEKLY 1820.07 1907.81 1997.69 2099.34 2198.85 . HRLY.RATE 22.75 23.85 24.97 26.24 27.49 B805 LIBRARY SERVICES MONTHLY 5830.61 6131 .99 6431 .06 6755.62 7108.01 MANAGER BIWEEKLY 2691 .05 2830.15 2968.18 3117.98 3280.62 HRLY.RATE 33.64 35.38 37.10 38.97 41 .01 B806 LIBRARY INFORMATION MONTHLY 5420.00 5691 .00 5976.00 6275.00 6589.00 SYSTEMS MANAGER BIWEEKLY 2501 .60 2626.62 2758.15 2896.80 3041 .07 HRLY.RATE 31 .27 32.83 34.48 36.21 38.01 B900 FACILITIES MONTHLY 5452.72 5728.60 6009.12 6322.10 6644.34 MAINTENANCE BIWEEKLY 2516.64 2643.97 2773.44 2917.89 3066.62 SUPERVISOR HRLY.RATE 31 .46 33.05 34.67 36.47 38.33 28 records listed. ''`1 .-y MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the City of Burlingame (City) and Burlingame Association of Middle Managers (BAMM) following meeting and conferring in good faith. It constitutes a full settlement of all issues regarding wages, terms and conditions of employment. The parties agree as follows: 1 . Salary 1 .1 Salary Adjustments Effective upon ratification of the contract by the BAMM membership and the Burlingame City Council, an across the board salary adjustment of 13% will be provided. The following classifications will receive an additional equity adjustment as indicated for all classifications represented by BAMM. Park Supervisor, City Arborist and Park Superintendent 5.7% Electrical Supervisor 2% As soon as practical retro pay for the same appropriate percentage increases will be paid back to June 18, 2001 . Effective the first pay period in July of 2002 an across the board salary adjustment of 5% will be provided. As discussed below, in the Fall of 2002 and 2003, the City will survey the market for selected benchmarks for salaries in effect as of October 15th. The results of those surveys will be used to determine across the board salary adjustments that will be effective the second pay period of December. However, if the City General Fund revenue growth is projected to fall by 10% or more below the estimated actual level (or audited actual if available) of the preceding fiscal year, the parties agree that, after meeting with the Unit representative to review the projected revenues, the contract may be reopened relative to salary increases upon request of the City. 1.2 Using Benchmarks for determining the salary adjustments during the term of the contract. The City will provide the market salary data for the following benchmark classifications: 1 . Parks Supervisor 2. Recreation Supervisor 3. Librarian III 4. Building Official 5. Accountant 6. Senior Planner 7. City Engineer 8. Fleet Manager 9. Public Works Superintendent When comparing market data we will compare the third place in the cities in the San Mateo County market to Burlingame base pay. A benchmark classification will be viewed as valid as long as there are at least 6 comparables found among the San Mateo County market. Step #1 . We will determine the average percentage increase necessary to bring the benchmarks to match the third place in the market. • • If the market data for one or more of the benchmark classification varies more than twice the average of all the benchmarks, we will drop that classification(s) as a benchmark(s) for that year and we will increase the compensation for that classification(s) equal to the third place in their specific market. The parties will meet and confer to determine salary adjustments for other classifications in the same"classification family"of any benchmark classification that is to be given a special equity adjustment. Step #2 We will determine the average percentage increase necessary to bring the remaining benchmarks to third place in the market. If the average of one or more of those benchmarks is less than half the average they will be dropped for use in determining the average for that year. Step #3 The average percentage increase necessary to bring the remaining benchmarks to third place in their market will be used as the across the board increase for all classifications represented by the BAMM unit; excepting those benchmark classification that were more than twice the average of the full list of benchmark classifications. Note: in the event that a benchmark classification has fewer than eight comparable cities the target city for salary purposes will be number two from the top rather than number three from the top. 1.3 Deferred Compensation: Effective 07/01/01, increase the matching contribution to deferred compensation to $30 per pay period. Deferred compensation is part of the total salary and will be included as such for future salary market analysis. 2. Benefits 2.1 Health Plans Effective 01/01/02 —the City agrees to pay up to $580 per month towards employee medical. In subsequent years of the contract, the City will meet and confer with the Unit to discuss the City's contribution towards the medical plans. The City agrees to conduct the meet and confer process on health plan contributions in August. 2.2 Dental and Vision Plans Effective 01/01/02 — the City agrees to pay $85 per month per employee for employee and dependent coverage for Dental and $10 per month per employee for Vision. Effective 01/01/03 and each subsequent calendar year of the contract, the City agrees to increase the monthly dental and vision contribution for employee and dependent coverage by the change in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from April of the prior calendar year to April of the current year. 2.3 Benefits for Permanent Part Time Employees Provide prorated accrual based on years of service for sick leave, vacation leave and holiday leave. Permanent part-time position accrual rates will be based on a prorated amount of a full-time equivalent position. Exempt from overtime part-time positions will receive a prorated amount of the 60-hour annual administrative leave provided to the fulltime exempt employees. At the end of each fiscal year, the accrual balances be adjusted to reflect hours worked over the budgeted amount. For example, a one-half(Y2) time employee will accrue 50% of sick, vacation, admin and holiday leave rates of that of a full-time equivalent. Maximum accruals will be based on a prorated amount of a full-time equivalent position. The City will meet and confer with the Association on the procedure to convert the current leave banks for permanent part-time employees. Provide life insurance in the amount of$35,000 for each permanent part-time employee. Employees may buy into dental and long-term disability(if allowed by insurance company) provided they pay the premium. 2.4 Flexible Benefits Program No later than January 1, 2002, the City will provide IRS section 125 Plans for dependent daycare and healthcare reimbursement to employees. The employees will pay any plan administrative fees for the program. 2.5 Long-term Disability Insurance City to continue insurance but may change carriers and/or change to self-insured plan. 2.6 Life Insurance Effective 01/01/02, the City will provide life insurance coverage of Seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) for members of the unit. Effective 01/01/02, the City will also provide for voluntary, employee- paid additional life insurance coverage through its group plan. This optional benefit will be paid for by employees via regular payroll deductions. 3. Retirement 3.1 One-Year Final Compensation Effective 01/01/02, the City will amend its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the One-Year Final Compensation Benefit (GC Section 20042) 3.2 Sick Leave for Service Credit Effective 01/01/02, the City will amend its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the service credit for accrued sick leave at time of retirement (GC Section 20965) The employee will still have an option to take a payment for unused sick leave and/or the a combination of some service credit and cash out for the balance of sick leave remaining after the reduction for the service credit. 3.3 Military Buy Back for Creditable Service Effective 01/01/02, the City will amend its contract with CaIPERS to provide for Military Service Credit (GC 21024). 3.4 Sick Leave Payout upon retirement Effective 07/01/01 —Upon retirement, the City agrees to pay members of this Unit the following from their sick leave bank: All hours between 0 and 600 hours will be paid at 25% All hours between 601 through 1200 will be paid at 35% All hours between 1201 through 1440 will be paid at 50% • Note: If a retiring employee elects to convert sick leave hours towards creditable service under the Ca1PERS Retirement Plan, hours that are converted are not eligible for sick leave payout. Those hours will be deducted from the sick leave bank and payout based on the remaining balance and above formula prior to the reduction. Maximum Accrual The maximum sick leave accrual is 1440 hours. 4. Vacation No changes to current accrual rates. The accrual rates during the term of this contract are as follows: Vacation shall be accrued as follows: From completion of 1st year of continuous employment through completion of 5th year - 10 days per year. From beginning of 6th year of continuous employment through completion of 10th year- 15 days per year During 1 lth year of continuous employment - 16 days per year During 12th year of continuous employment - 17 days per year During 13th year of continuous employment - 18 days per year During 14th year of continuous employment -19 days per year During 15th year of continuous employment - 20 days per year During 16th year of continuous employment - - 21 days per year During 17th year of continuous employment - 22 days per year During the 18th and each year thereafter of continuous employment- 23 days per year. Accrual Maximum- Earned vacation time may be accumulated,but the employee shall not be allowed to have an accumulation of more than two (2)years' credit at any time. 5. Administrative Leave and Compensatory Time: 5.1 Upon ratification of this agreement and approval of the City Council, all BAMM classifications that are FLSA exempt will not receive overtime nor accrue compensatory time. The only exception to this policy will be when the following FLSA exempt classifications are assigned by their department head to a callback/standby list: Street and Sewer Supervisor Parks Supervisor City Arborist Water Supervisor City Electrician Fleet Manager Assistant Water Superintendent Assistant Street & Sewer Superintendent When the above classifications are performing the callback/standby duties, they are eligible to receive compensatory time. The maximum compensatory time accrual will be 90 hours. The following full-time classifications will receive 80 hours of administrative leave per fiscal year: Recreation Supervisor Recreation Superintendent Assistant Public Works Director Public Works Superintendent City Engineer Financial Service Manager • All other fulltime FLSA exempt classifications shall receive 60 hours of administrative leave per fiscal year. Employees in FLSA exempt classifications may submit up to a maximum of one year of administrative leave accrual for payment. Payout of administrative leave can be requested to be paid with the first paycheck of December and/or the final paycheck of June each calendar year. At no time will administrative leave balance be allowed to exceed twice the annual accrual. With the consent of the department head an employee may request that the City Manager authorize additional administrative leave. By December 1, 2004, all compensatory time balances must been used. Any unused balances of compensatory time remaining on the books will be forfeited by employees. This applies to all FLSA exempt classifications within the unit with the exception of the following classifications who may carry a balance not to exceed 90 hours of compensatory time: Street and Sewer Supervisor Parks Supervisor City Arborist Water Supervisor City Electrician Fleet Manager Assistant Water Superintendent Assistant Street & Sewer Superintendent 6. Licenses 6.1 Effective July 1, 2001 to provide $100 per month for the following certifications: - Water Distribution Operator Grade D3 for all Public Works Water related BAMM classifications - Water Distribution Operator Grade D2 for Water Supervisor classification 6.2 Class B Drivers License Public Works Yard BAMM Classifications who are required to maintain Class B Drivers' Licenses will receive $100 a month for maintenance of their Class B Licenses. It is the City's intention to incorporate differentials into base pay as that becomes prevailing practice with the survey market. 7. Professional Improvements 7.1 City is developing a new training program and anticipates that it will provide the type of training professional growth opportunities that the BAMM membership is seeking. In the Spring of 2002 and 2003 BAMM, at it's option, may request an opportunity to revisit the issue of professional improvements. The City agrees if requested to meet with BAMM representatives to discuss suggestions. 8. Mileage and Use of City Vehicles 8.1 City to provide mileage reimbursement for use of personal vehicles for City Business, unless carpooling. Mileage will be reimbursed at IRS mileage rate. 9. Safety Shoes 9.1 Provided for appropriate members as determined by Human Resources Director, maximum of$180 year. 10. Term 10.1 This agreement shall be effective upon approval of BAMM membership and the City Council and will expire on December 12, 2004. It is understood that the parties should commence and complete negotiations in advance of the expiration, as the City is not prepared to pay retroactive pay if the new contract has not been approved prior to the expiration date. City agrees not to alter, amend, or reduce any existing benefit during the term of this agreement without meeting and conferring regarding such change. City Association Date: Date: RESOLUTION NO. 76-2001 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING CHANGES TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE BURLINGAME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE MANAGERS AND AUTHROIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MEMORNADUM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and conditions of employment as provided by State law; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association have reached agreement on certain changes to be made to the existing terms and conditions of employment and memorandum of understanding between the City and the Association; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public and the employees represented by the Association; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The changes in existing salary of the employees represented by the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers as contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in Exhibit B into the Memorandum of Understanding between the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers and the City of Burlingame. AY I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 16th day of July, 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: JANNEY CITY CLERK ff1511511%/A STAFF REPORT BURLJNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 8 c z Tumor Cro MTG. ''�, s 4. DATE 7-16-01 ATIM JUNE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED 41,difBY DATE: July 9, 2001 APPROVE FROM: Robert Bell, Human Resources Director BY 4 "I%I fl SUBJECT: Addition of Position for Human Resources Department d Resolution Authorizing Transfer of Funds From Contingency Reserve RECOMMENDATION: Approve the addition of one Human Resources Specialist (1.0 full time equivalent) and approve the transfer of$70,000.00 from the contingency reserve. BACKGROUND: The newly formed Human Resources Department is experiencing a tremendous amount of activity in the areas of recruitment and employee benefits administration. It is also expected that in the next three months, the department will begin the administration of the City's workers' compensation program, which will add significantly to the department's workload. Currently, there are three full-time positions in the department — which consist of a Human Resources Director, Employment and Benefits Administrator and a Human Resources Assistant. The newly created position of Human Resources Specialist would provide the day-to-day administration and customer service in the areas of recruitment, benefits administration, employee orientation and disability/leave of absence programs for assigned departments. The position will also be responsible for participating in and facilitating employee involvement committees. In addition to providing the day-to-day support to assigned departments, this position will also assist the Director with the design and implementation of the Citywide training program; data gathering and analysis as it pertains to classification and compensation studies; and expansion of the City's applicant outreach programs. The City's newly created Human Resources Department has had a very positive impact on the City's labor relations, recruitment and employee involvement programs. In order to expand these activities and absorb the administration of the City's workers' compensation program, an additional position is required in the department. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution _..:�.': �. :i..;�:>iiuEa�.HS.:r.,,�yr �:.... ,..o:�}; rt„ ,•1,„ ..�,,. � ... :b.. CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROPRIATION TRANSFER REQUEST DEPARTMENT Human Resources DATE: 07/10/01 1 . REQUEST TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS AS LISTED BELOW: FUND DEPT OBJT PROJ AMT DESCRIPTION 'FROM: 101 Contingency Reserve TO: 101 64420 010 $70,000 Justification (Attach Memo if Necessary) See attached DEPARTMENT HEAD BY. eDATE: i/JO o, 2. COUNCIL ACTION ECOUNCIL ACTION NOT REQUIRED Q IRED Remarks: FINANCE DIRECTOR BY: DATE 3. APPROVE AS REQUESTED ❑APPROVE AS REVISED 17 DISAPPROVE Re arks: CITY MANAGER BY: DATE: RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, that WHEREAS, the Department hereinabove named in the Request for Appropriation, Allotment or Transfer of Funds has requested the transfer of certain funds as described in said Request: and WHEREAS, the Finance Director has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager has recommended the transfer of funds as set forth hereinabove: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DETERMINED that the recommendations of the City Manager be approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS CITY CLERK L:\Forms & Templates\Transfer Request.doc CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROPRIATION TRANSFER REQUEST DEPARTMENT Human Resources DATE: 07/10/01 1. REQUEST TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS AS LISTED BELOW. FUND DEPT OBJT PROJ AMT DESCRIPTION FROM: 101 Contingency Reserve TO: 101 64420 010 $70,000 Justification (Attach Memo if Necessary) See attached DEPARTMENT HEAD BY.OrlSt*/ DATE: i//0/i! 2. COUNCIL ACTION El COUNCIL ACTION NOT REQUIRED Q IRED Remarks: FINANCE DIRECTOR BY: DATE 3. APPROVE AS REQUESTED EAPPROVE AS REVISED El DISAPPROVE Re arks: CITY MANAGER BY: DATE: RESOLUTION 77-2001 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, that WHEREAS, the Department hereinabove named in the Request for Appropriation,Allotment or Transfer of Funds has requested the transfer of certain funds as described in said Request: and WHEREAS, the Finance Director has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager has recommended the transfer of funds as set forth hereinabove: NOW,THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DETERMINED that the recommendations of the City Manager be approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected. CAc•-C I,ANN T.MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify tha the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16TH day of .TTTLY . and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS COFFEY, GALLIGAN, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JANNEY CITY CLERK L:\Forms&Templates\Transfer Request.doc AGENDA ITEM# 8 .d BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. DATE 7-16-01 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMIT `'/�/J/� BY: -C (/ DATE: July 7, 2001 FROM: Fire Department APPRO I BY: / V SUBJECT: EMS Clinical Education Specialist Agreement Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve by resolution the "Agreement for Joint EMS Training Program" amongst the cities of Burlingame, Millbrae, the Town of Hillsborough and the California Department of Forestry- Santa Cruz/San Mateo Ranger unit and the City of San Mateo. Background: This agreement will provide in-service paramedic and EMT (emergency medical technician) continuing education, as required by San Mateo County Emergency Medical Services to all of our firefighters and firefighter/paramedics. We currently require our paramedics to meet their continuing education(CE) obligations on their off- duty days. The city pays for the classes and the firefighters overtime to attend the classes. The annual cost of this process for the City is approximately $28,000.00. We do not currently have direct control over the quality of the instruction, or are we able to alter the curriculum to address the EMS protocols of San Mateo County. We provide on duty EMT training to the firefighters through Mark Ladas, our Paramedic Coordinator and EMT instructors within our department. You may recall that we contract the services of Mark Ladas from the City of Millbrae as a joint paramedic coordinator for both agencies. With this agreement the shared position of Clinical Education Specialist will report to our Coordinator and provide not only the EMT continuing education (CE) but the paramedic CE as well. This will enable both the paramedics and EMTs to receive their training at the same time. They will be presented with a curriculum that applies directly to the San Mateo County Protocols as approved by our county EMS authority and clinical director. Both the Director of Emergency Medical Services, Barbara Pletz and the Clinical Director, Dr. Karl Sporer are very supportive of us providing the required continuing education to our paramedics and EMTs through our in-service training program.