Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2019.11.04CITY A vowwteo Monday, November 4, 2019 City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda City Council 6:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers STUDY SESSION - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers a. Discussion of Building Electrification and Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Reach Codes Attachments: Staff Report Note: Public comment is permitted on all action items as noted on the agenda below and in the non -agenda public comment provided for in item 7. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although the provision of a name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each; the Mayor may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. All votes are unanimous unless separately noted for the record. 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION 5. UPCOMING EVENTS 6. PRESENTATIONS 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Council agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the City Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consent calendar items are usually approved in a single motion, unless pulled for separate discussion. Any member of the public wishing to comment on an item listed here may do so by submitting a speaker slip for that item in advance of the Council's consideration of the consent calendar. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 1013112019 City Council Meeting Agenda November 4, 2019 a. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes for October 21 2019 Attachments: Meeting Minutes b. Adoption of an Ordinance to Amend Title 17 and Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code and Adoption by Reference of the 2019 California Building Standards Code and the 2018 Edition of the International Fire Code Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance C. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America Inc for Plan Check and Building Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 to Increase the Contract Amount by $700 000 to Cover Expected Expenses Related to the Burlingame Point Development Project Attachments: Staff Reoort Resolution Original Agreement d. Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the 2019 Tourism Business Improvement District Annual Report and to Give Notice of Intent to Lew Assessments for 2020 Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Annual Report 2019 e. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizinq the City Manager to Execute Amendments to Professional Services Agreements to Extend the Term of Agreement for Various Consulting Firms Attachments: Staff Report Resolution List of Expired Professional Service Agreements Sample Amendment to Agreement Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Tentative and Final Parcel Map (PM 19-02). Lot Merqer of Parcels 1 2 3 4 and 5 as Described in Grant Deed Volume 5902 at Page 111 in San Mateo County Records Located at 1350 Bayshore Highway Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Final Parcel Mao Cify of Butfingame Page 2 Printetl on 1013112019 City Council Meeting Agenda November 4, 2019 g. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Tentative and Final Parcel Map (PM 19-03). Lot Merger of Lots 8 9 14 15 and Portion of Lot 7 Block 10 Map of Polo Field Subdivision at City Parking Lot N Located at 160 Lorton Avenue Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Final Parcel Mao December 10 2018 Planning Commission Minutes h. Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Professional Services Agreement with CSG Consultants for Project Management and Construction Inspection Services for the New City Parking Garage (Lot N) Located at 160 Lorton Avenue in the Amount of $208,320 Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Professional Services Agreement Project Location Mar) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Up to $15,000 in Matching Funds for Holiday Decorations in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Commercial Districts Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Adoption of Resolutions Authorizing Professional Services Agreements with The EDCCO Group and Telstar Instruments for the Supervisory Control and Data Acguisition (SCADA) System Services Related to the City's Utility Infrastructure System for $375,000 Attachments: Staff Report Resolution for EDCCO SCADA Services Agreement Resolution for Telstar SCADA Services Agreement EDCCO Professional Services Agreement Telstar Professional Services Agreement 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Public Comment) a. Introduction of an Ordinance Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Includin Vavinq Liquids Attachments: Staff Report Proposed Ordinance 10. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS (Public Comment) a. Consideration of Two Appointments to the Beautification Commission Attachments: Staff Report City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 10131/7019 City Council Meeting Agenda November 4, 2019 b. Consideration of One Appointment to the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission Attachments: Staff Report 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmembers report on committees and activities and make announcements. 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlingame.org. a. Mayor Colson's Committee Report Attachments: Committee Reoort 14. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at (650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Pnmrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burtingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Next regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 18, 2019 VIEW REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ONLINE AT www.burlingame.org/video Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Water Office counter at City Hall at 501 Primrose Road during normal business hours. City o/ Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 10/31/2019 '��9 STAFF REPORT 4r To: Date: From: Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: Study Session MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Sigalle Michael, Sustainability Coordinator — (650) 558-7261 Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Subject: Discussion of Building Electrification and Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Reach Codes RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council discuss Building Code reach codes that would encourage duel - fuel or all electric construction and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in new developments. BACKGROUND On November 4, the City Council is scheduled to adopt the triennial update of the California Building Standards Code that will go into effect January 1, 2020. In conjunction with this process, local governments have an option to adopt reach codes as a supplement to the triennial update. Reach codes are local building code amendments that go beyond the State's requirements for energy efficiency and green building standards. Local governments generally adopt reach codes to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and meet climate action goals. Reach codes that encourage new developments to reduce or eliminate natural gas in new construction have gained momentum over the past year. Natural gas usage in buildings is one of the largest sources of GHG emissions for local municipalities, usually second to transportation, and California is taking significant action to eliminate GHG emissions from buildings. In 2018, California adopted SB 100 mandating that all electricity in California be carbon free by 2045; Executive Order B-55-18 established a statewide goal to be carbon neutral by 2045. These ambitious targets ignited efforts on the local level for cleaner electricity and a move away from fossil fuels. Local community choice aggregation programs have accelerated the use of renewable energy and commitments for carbon -free electricity. Peninsula Clean Energy, Burlingame's local electricity provider, is on the path to 100% renewable energy for San Mateo County by 2025 and currently offers 90% carbon - free electricity. Over 50 cities in California are set to adopt reach codes, and 18 jurisdictions in San Mateo County are currently considering them. The cities of Berkeley, San Jose, Menlo Park, Morgan Hill, Los 1 Building Electrification Reach Code November 4, 2019 Angeles, and the University of California have already adopted ordinances that limit or eliminate the use of natural gas. DISCUSSION There are a number of different approaches municipalities can take to adopt reach codes, ranging from "fuel neutral," which focuses primarily on energy efficiency (with a corresponding reduction in GHG emissions from reduced energy use), to "future -focused all -electric," which prepares for a future scenario of carbon -free electricity. Table 1 below summarizes three common approaches to reach codes being considered by municipalities in conjunction with the triennial update of the California Building Standards Code: TABLE 1 REACH CODE APPROACHES Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) Model Reach Codes Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), with the support of the San Mateo County Office of Sustainability, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy, is encouraging local jurisdictions to adopt reach codes in conjunction with the triennial building code update adoption. PCE developed two proposed reach codes for jurisdictions to consider. One reach code targets building electrification and solar power, and the other looks at EV infrastructure. PCE is also providing technical and funding assistance to jurisdictions. The City of Burlingame, along with other San Mateo County municipalities, received a $10,000 grant from PCE to assist with the staff work related to consideration of reach codes. 2 Future Focused All -Electric Emissions Focused Electric -Preferred Energy -Focused Fuel Neutral All -electric meets code. All fuel types increase Summary Mixed fuel must increase efficiency efficiency. CALGreen Tier 1 for + Energy Efficiency for all Residential Mixed -Fuel buildings No New Natural Gas (28-75% better) (27-44% better) High -Rise Hookups CALGreen Tier 1 & 2 0 4-10 /o better Residential 5-10% better + Energy Efficiency for + Energy Efficiency for all Commercial Mixed Fuel buildings (5-15%) (5-15%) Average GHG 37% 21% 16% Savings Source: Building Decarbonization Coalition Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) Model Reach Codes Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), with the support of the San Mateo County Office of Sustainability, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy, is encouraging local jurisdictions to adopt reach codes in conjunction with the triennial building code update adoption. PCE developed two proposed reach codes for jurisdictions to consider. One reach code targets building electrification and solar power, and the other looks at EV infrastructure. PCE is also providing technical and funding assistance to jurisdictions. The City of Burlingame, along with other San Mateo County municipalities, received a $10,000 grant from PCE to assist with the staff work related to consideration of reach codes. 2 Building Electrification Reach Code November 4, 2019 Building Electricity The proposed PCE building model reach code offers a dual -fuel option for new buildings, in the manner of the "Emissions Focused Electric -Preferred" approach summarized in Table 1. In the PCE model code, new developments may choose to build all -electric; or alternatively, they may use natural gas for heating, cooling, and cooking provided they meet 15% higher efficiency standards and install the wiring and circuits for electric appliances. The City of San Mateo recently adopted PCE's proposed reach code with slight variations, and many other local jurisdictions are considering it as well. The City of Menlo Park took a different route by requiring all low rise residential (one -three stories) to use electric space and water heating (with some exceptions) and the option of natural gas for cooking. New commercial and high rise multifamily buildings must be all electric (with some exceptions). Menlo Park's approach simplifies the permit process and will achieve higher GHG emission reductions from buildings than PCE's dual -fuel option. The exceptions in Menlo Park's code include: • Life science buildings may use natural gas for space heating. • Public agency owned and operated emergency operations centers (such as fire stations and police stations) may use natural gas. • Nonresidential kitchens (such as for-profit restaurants and cafeterias) may appeal to use natural gas stoves. • For all exceptions that are granted, natural gas appliance locations must be electrically pre- wired for future electric appliance installation. The proposed PCE building reach code relies on incentivizing developments to choose all -electric over the dual -fuel option, but stops short of requiring all -electric. Incentivizing developers, contractors, and occupants to choose an electric option over natural gas —which they may be more used to and comfortable with — may take significant outreach and education resources and may not result in the reach code's intended outcomes. Also, building electrification, specifically for space and water heating, is most cost effective at the design and construction phase of buildings. Building electrification reach codes make local amendments to the state's Energy Code, and the California Energy Commission (CEC) requires such reach codes to demonstrate that the amendments are cost effective and do not cause unreasonable burden to builders. The California Statewide Codes and Standards Program (a statewide utility program) has been supporting the reach code effort and prepared cost-effectiveness studies analyzing all -electric and mixed -fuel new construction that jurisdictions can apply in their reach codes. (Cost effectiveness studies are not needed for the EV reach code since that reach code makes a local amendment to the Green Building Standard Code and not the Energy Code.) City of Burlingame staff has been analyzing the City's potential adoption of reach codes because such an action will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and implement the City's recently adopted Climate Action Plan Update (CAP). Burlingame's CAP presents the City's strategy to avoid Building Electrification Reach Code November 4, 2019 approximately 50,000 MTCO2e' over the next decade to achieve its goal of reducing GHG emissions by 40% by 2030. Natural gas in buildings represents 23% of Burlingame's GHG emissions. The City's CAP currently estimates reductions from increased green building and efficiencies in natural gas to about 3,300 MTCO2e by 2030 (CAP Measures 11 and 12). Adopting an all -electric building reach code would contribute an additional 3,000 MTCO2e reduction by 2030. Reductions from the PCE proposed dual -fuel option reach code would be considerably less and rely on how many projects choose the all -electric option. Although building electrification reach codes will help transition the building sector to be carbon - free, the change will occur gradually in Burlingame given that it would only apply to new construction (existing buildings would not be required to be modified). On average, the City permits approximately 14 new single family homes per year, one new major multi -family project per year, and one or fewer new commercial buildings per year. PCE anticipates a modest impact from reach codes on their electricity load. PCE will be modeling the outcomes of the countywide reach code efforts and has high confidence that they will be able to meet the growth in demand. Solar Energy The new 2019 Building Code requires all new single family homes to install solar power. The PCE proposed reach code extends the requirement to include a minimum amount of on-site solar to commercial and large multi -family developments. More specifically, the proposed reach code requires a 3kW solar photovoltaic system on new non-residential buildings less than 10,000. sq. ft., and a 5kW solar photovoltaic system for commercial and multi -family buildings greater than 10,000 sq. ft. EV Infrastructure The EV charging infrastructure reach code is intended to support the state's goal of five million zero emission vehicles on the road by 2030 and 250,000 EV charging stations by 2025. PCE's proposed reach code expands on the limited EV infrastructure requirements in the new 2019 Building Code. Installing EV infrastructure equipment during construction costs two to five times less than when installing it in an existing building. Table 2 below lists the proposed reach code EV infrastructure requirements in comparison to the 2019 Building Code. TABLE 2 EV INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS 2019 BUILDING CODE COMAPRED TO PCE REACH CODE Development 2019 Building Code PCE Reach Code 1-2 unit single family (1) Level 2 capable (1) Level 2 outlet and (1) Level 1 outlet Multifamily, <20 units 10% of spaces Level 2 (1) Level 2 outlet/dwelling capable Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent 4 Building Electrification Reach Code November 4, 2019 Multifamily, >20 units 10% of spaces Level 2 25% Level 2 outlet/dwelling capable 75% Level 1 outlet/dwelling 6% Level 2 capable 10% Level 2 stations Office Building 10% Level 1 outlet 30% Level 2 outlets or capable 6% Level 2 capable 6% Level 2 stations Commercial Buildings 5% Level 1 outlet (1) fast charger per 100 spaces - Level 2 outlet is a dryer outlet that an EV can plug into (also known as EV Ready and Plug & Play). - Level 1 outlet is a standard outlet that an EV can plug into. Charging occurs at a slower rate than level 2 outlets. - Level 2 station means an EV charging station is installed. - Level 2 capable means the conduit and electricity is installed, but equipment is still needed for charging. The EV infrastructure reach code would directly implement the climate action strategy (Measure 6) in Burlingame's CAP that requires new residential developments to include level 2 charging. All -Electric Construction As described above, the City of Menlo Park adopted a reach code that prioritizes all -electric construction to a greater degree than the PCE model reach code, and the interest in all -electric codes appears to be growing. For example, jurisdictions such as Morgan Hill, Berkeley, Mountain View, San Jose, and the County of San Mateo have been opting to adopt ordinances that prohibit use of natural gas for space and water heating. All -electric construction is not a new concept, however. One out of four homes are all -electric across the United States, and all -electric homes are common in Europe and Asia. The theory is that all -electric construction reduces the carbon footprint of a building when electricity is sourced from 100% renewable and carbon -free sources. Research has shown that transitioning to efficient electric appliances could be the most effective way to reduce GHG emissions in homes and buildings.' All -electric construction is associated with other benefits as well, including: • Public health: All -electric buildings improve indoor air quality by eliminating the burning of natural gas inside homes. Studies have found that emissions from gas cooking can far surpass outdoor pollution levels and impact respiratory diseases. All -electric buildings also eliminate risks of carbon monoxide poisoning. • Cost savings: For new construction, all -electric buildings avoid the infrastructure costs of natural gas, making them generally cheaper to construct. Electric appliances are generally competitive with natural gas appliances in efficiency and costs. 2 Building Decarbonization Coalition, http://www.buildingdecarb.org/resources/a-roadmap-to-decarbonize- californias-buildings 5 Building Electrification Reach Code November4, 2019 • Public safety: All -electric buildings avoid the dangers of natural gas accidents caused by earthquakes, gas leaks, and poorly maintained gas lines.3 However, it is important to understand that electrical building systems and distribution systems can also present safety dangers such as electrical fires, and indeed electrical failures or malfunctions were the second leading cause of U.S. home fires in 2012-2016 (behind fires caused by unattended equipment).4 The rationale for requiring all -electric construction is that building more new developments that use natural gas means those are additional buildings that would need to be converted in the future as California and cities transition to carbon -free buildings. That said, PCE has recommended the dual - fuel approach because it believes such an approach can be adopted smoothly and has a solid legal basis. Incentive Approaches Given that all -electric building is already feasible (but not required), another option would be to offer incentives that could encourage, but not require, new developments to be designed for all -electric construction. For example, the interim zoning created for Burlingame's North Rollins Road and North Burlingame Mixed Use Districts includes an option for increased floor area and building height for "Net Zero Energy" projects that receive 100 percent of total energy from renewable sources. One option would be to offer a similar incentive approach elsewhere in the City. Another option would be to encourage passive solar design in new development. This would allow energy savings through solar water heating and/or windows, walls, and floors that collect, store, reflect, and distribute solar energy in the form of heat in the winter and reject solar heat in the summer. An incentive approach could be paired with the PCE duel -fuel code to further encourage (but not require) all -electric construction, or alternatively could be paired with a less -involved "Energy - Focused Fuel Neutral" approach as summarized in Table 1. Next Steps Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on the best reach code route for Burlingame with consideration to the proposed PCE reach codes. Staff then will propose a reach code ordinance for City Council consideration. Should a reach code ultimately be approved, staff will file the reach code with the California Energy Commission and await a 60 -day comment period. Once approved by the CEC, the reach code would go into effect at the end of the CEC comment period, or later depending on the City's timeline. 3 A Zero Emission All -Electric Multifamily Construction Guide, Redwood Energy, httpsi/tfossilfreebuildings.org/ElectricMFGuide.pdf 4 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), htti)s://www.nfl)a.org/News-and-Research/Data-research- and-tool s/Electrica I/E I ectrical Building Electrification Reach Code FISCAL IMPACT None. November 4, 2019 7 Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 IMC ikoh W!RLIMq j ME W--- BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting on October 21, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by former Councilmember John Root. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 5. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor Colson reviewed the upcoming events taking place in the city. 6. PRESENTATIONS a. FIRE PREVENTION MONTH PRESENTATION BY CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CCFD Fire Inspector Julie Parenti explained that October is "Fire Prevention Month." She stated that every year, CCFD visits all the elementary schools in Burlingame, Hillsborough, and Millbrae to talk to the students about fire prevention. Fire Inspector Parenti noted that this year's theme is "Not every hero wears a cape, plan your escape." She explained that the theme teaches students to create a family evacuation plan. Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Fire Inspector Parenti stated that during October, CCFD holds a contest for the students. The students are asked to complete a home fire safety checklist to determine if their home and family are prepared. Fire Inspector Parenti presented St. Catherine 8th grader Helena Morell with a certificate. She noted that Ms. Morell will also get a personalized tour of one of CCFD's stations with her family. Congratulations Ms. Morell! Thank you for your preparedness. b. BUSINESS LANDSCAPE AWARD Beautification Commissioner Qiva Dinuri explained that the Business Landscape Award recognizes the efforts of a local business to beautify the City of Burlingame. Commissioner Dinuri presented the Burlingame Woman's Club with the 2019 Business Landscape Award. Additionally, the Burlingame Woman's Club received a watercolor of their front yard from local artist Dale Perkins. Congratulations to the Burlingame Woman's Club! c. SUSTAINABLE RESIDENTIAL AWARD Beautification Commissioner Dinuri explained that the Residential Sustainable Landscape Award was created to recognize exceptional residential landscape design that exemplifies sustainable landscape solutions. Commissioner Dinuri presented John Ward with the 2019 Residential Sustainable Landscape Award. Congratulations to John Ward! 7. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no public comments. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Colson asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Brownrigg pulled item 8b. Councilmember Keighran made a motion to adopt items 8a, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8f, 8g, and 8h; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 2 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 a. ADOPTION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 07, 2019 Vice Mayor Beach requested an amendment to the Meeting Minutes. On page 7, Vice Mayor Beach's statement was edited in italics as follows: Vice Mayor Beach thanked staff and the developer for their work on bringing affordable units to the community. Although she noted not agreeing with all the terms along the way, the DDA reflected the majority will of the Council and she would support it. b. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.48.010 TO REQUIRE SAFE STORAGE OF FIREARMS Councilmember Keighran recused herself from this item due to her work with Supervisor Canepa on the County's ordinance. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that this ordinance is an important piece of legislation that the City worked on. He noted that he and Councilmember Ortiz are looking at other commonsense pieces of legislation concerning gun safety that the City can adopt. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Ordinance Number 1968; seconded by Vice Mayor Beach. The motion passed by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Keighran recused). c. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF BURLINGAME'S RESPONSE TO THE GRAND JURY REPORT "ELECTRICAL VEHICLE ADOPTION IN THE CITIES AND COUNTY OF SAN MATEO" DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 122-2019. d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $786,698 FOR THE 2019 SIDEALK REPAIR PROGRAM, CITY PROJECT NO. 85520 DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 123-2019. e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP (PM 18-08), LOT MERGER OF PARCELS D AND E, BLOCK 6, MAP OF MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3 AT ONE AND 45 ADRIAN COURT DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 124-2019. 3 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item Ba Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 f. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE'S TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM Police Chief Matteucci requested Council adopt Resolution Number 125-2019. g. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) Police Chief Matteucci requested Council adopt Resolution Number 126-2019. h. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE'S BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP Police Chief Matteucci requested Council adopt Resolution Number 127-2019. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 17 AND TITLE 18 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND THE 2018 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE CDD Gardiner stated that the proposed amendments to Title 17 and Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code are part of the tri -annual update of the California Building Standards Code. He explained that Title 17 is the fire code, and Title 18 contains the building and construction codes. CDD Gardiner stated that all jurisdictions are required by State law to adopt and enforce the most recent codes reviewed and approved by the California Building Standards Commission. He explained that the new codes would become effective January 1, 2020. CDD Gardiner stated that CCFD and building staff coordinated the update. He explained that attached to the staff report is a list of the more notable changes to the fire and building codes. He noted that it wasn't a comprehensive list. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if he was correct that the changes were due to updated fire and energy efficiency regulations. Chief Building Inspector Rick Caro stated that the updates include the California Energy Code. Councilmember Brownrigg asked how the proposed amendments relate to Reach Codes. City Attorney Kane stated that the proposed amendments before the Council are ones that the City must do as a matter of State law. She explained that Reach Codes are a policy question that the Council will be considering at their next meeting. She added that the proposed amendments do include regulations regarding improving energy efficiency. 4 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the amendments require new single-family homes to have photovoltaics on their roofs. He discussed the issues with this requirement, including if the new home sits in the shade. Mayor Colson voiced her agreement with Councilmember Brownrigg, stating that the requirement for photovoltaics on roofs could create an enormous solar energy supply in the middle of the day that can't be offloaded. She stated that the State's top down mandates don't take into consideration the issues and geography of each jurisdiction. She noted that it would be better for these matters to be regulated through local zoning ordinances. Councilmember Brownrigg discussed the requirement for 10% of the parking spaces at new multi -family dwellings to be EV (electric vehicle) spaces. He asked when this requirement would be implemented. CDD Gardiner stated that the requirement would take effect January 1, 2020. He noted that building permit applications filed prior to that date wouldn't be required to have 10% of their spaces be EV spaces. Mayor Colson talked about the rapid change in the technology for EV charging stations. She stated that the code should say that every space should have conduit so that it could be electrified. Councilmember Brownrigg voiced support for Mayor Colson's point and asked if the City should require conduits. City Attorney Kane stated that this could be discussed in combination with the Reach Codes. Mayor Colson asked the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. City Clerk Hassel -Shearer read the title. Vice Mayor Beach made a motion to waive further reading and introduce the ordinance; seconded by Councilmember Ortiz. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Colson opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Mayor Colson asked that the proposed ordinance be brought back for adoption at the next City Council meeting. b. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVIGN THE ISSUANCE BY THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $40,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE BURLINGAME COMMUNITY CENTER; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A FACILITIES LEASE, A FACILITIES SUBLEASE AND A NOTICE OF SALE; APPROVING THE FORM OF THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THE TAKING OF ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS RELATING TO THE FINANCING WITH THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY 5 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Finance Director Augustine stated that staff is requesting approval for the issuance of lease revenue bonds to finance the new community center. She stated that PFM, the City's financial advisors, determined that a competitive bid would be appropriate. Vice Mayor Beach asked if she was correct that the City would obtain a good interest rate. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Beach asked if the City's recent AAA rating was a component in obtaining a good interest rate. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Brownrigg clarified that the City had not yet obtained an interest rate as the bonds hadn't been issued. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative and explained that the staff report included a predicted interest rate. Vice Mayor Beach discussed the City's diligence in funding the Capital Investment Reserve. She explained that it becomes a financial question whether to utilize the funds in the reserve or issue bonds when the interest rate is good. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative and noted that this is one of the factors. She discussed other factors such as how much future residents should pay for the building as opposed to current residents, and what other capital needs exist in the City. Finance Director Augustine stated that through Council direction, it was determined that the City should commit $1 million of Measure I revenues and $1 million of General Fund revenues to pay the debt service on the bonds. She noted that staff expects to obtain bond proceeds of $37 million, and the rest will come from the Capital Investment Reserve. Councilmember Brownrigg asked why the City caps the bonds at $40 million. He explained that if the City is prepared to pay $2 million in debt service every year, and if this amount could purchase $43 or $44 million, why wouldn't the City do so. Finance Director Augustine explained that she believed that the $40 million was a conservative figure. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if he was correct that PFM believes that the $2 million that the City has established for debt service would afford a $37 million lease revenue bond. PFM representative Kevin Dong replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the $40 million cap was because it was PFM's determination that there was no way the City can borrow more than that. Mr. Dong stated that they believe that $37 million is appropriate. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about prepayments. He stated that in reading Article 4, it states that the City can prepay whenever the City wants. Mr. Dong replied that the City can start prepaying after ten years. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he didn't see the language that the City had to wait ten years. Finance Director Augustine replied that she would check with the City's bond counsel. 6 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Councilmember Ortiz stated that the pricing will happen when the bonds go out to market. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Ortiz asked what rate the $2 million debt service is based on. Mr. Dong replied it is based on 3.51 %. He noted that this has a bit of a cushion. Mayor Colson asked if she was correct that it is a thirty-year term bond. Finance Director Augustine replied in the affirmative. Mayor Colson opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if the Council should go over the process by which the City will pick contractors. City Attorney Kane stated that because this matter wasn't agendized, it could happen as a brief background discussion. Councilmember Brownrigg asked if staff would be scheduling a meeting to discuss construction options. City Attorney Kane replied in the affirmative and stated that the pre -qualification list is currently under review. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he wanted to make sure that the discussion is scheduled early enough so that if necessary, changes could be made. City Attorney Kane replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Ortiz made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 128-2019; seconded by Councilmember Brownrigg. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. STAFF REPORTS a. UPDATE ON "SEA CHANGE BURLINGAME" CDD Gardiner stated that during the City Council's 2019 goal -setting session, the Council identified five infrastructure initiatives for special focus over the next year. One of the initiatives was sea level rise. He noted that at the same time, the City was awarded a grant from San Mateo County for a sea level rise assessment. He stated that the City has been working with the County and a consultant on "Sea Change Burlingame". CDD Gardiner explained that the study is trying to answer the question of what will be the City's approach to sea level rise. He noted that the study is a first pass and wouldn't provide a full implementation plan. CDD Gardiner explained that the overall goal of the study is to develop an implementable sea -level rise adaptation plan for Burlingame's shoreline and residents. He stated that the objectives include: • Assessing baseline flood risk that includes future sea -level rise projections; • Developing reasonable and feasible sea level rise adaptations appropriate to Burlingame's setting; 7 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 • Evaluating a range of adaptation measures to inform the selection of recommended measures; and • Integrating recommended measures into a phased adaptation plan to guide implementation. CDD Gardiner stated that the first step was the Vulnerability Assessment, which drew off earlier efforts by the County of San Mateo. He noted that the assessment is now being done on a more local scale, with the group reviewing each segment of the Bayfront. He explained that the working group has divided the Bayfront into a series of segments called Reaches. He showed a map of the Bayfront with the five Reaches that were established in Burlingame. CDD Gardiner stated that on October 16, the City held a community meeting on sea level rise. He explained that this was the City's first chance to share some ideas with the community. He noted that this has been a collaborative effort with the City's neighbors on the Bay (including Millbrae, San Mateo, and SFO). CDD Gardiner showed visuals of how the City could utilize a levee to combat sea level rise. Additionally, he showed images of stitching together the different solutions for each Reach. CDD Gardiner showed an example of a nature -based approach where a beach is used to break wave action. CDD Gardiner stated that after the study is completed, it will be brought back to the City Council to discuss conclusions and potential solutions. CDD Gardiner noted Council's previous discussion on establishing an interim moratorium on touching the sea wall until the study is completed. He stated that at this point there is a better understanding of the different options the City has, and that the solution will not be a one -size -fits -all approach. He explained that there's room for different approaches along the Bayfront, providing they can all tie together. Therefore, he stated that the City could revisit a moratorium in the future, but he didn't feel it was currently needed. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that he assumed when the working group began that the City was on a 20 - or 30 -year timeline. However, he stated that it became clear that there are a number of breaches that happen sooner than 20 years. Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the portion of the Bayfront between Broadway and SFO is much more vulnerable than the southern portion of the Bayfront for the City. He stated that he had imagined the City undertaking a single defense for the Bayfront. He explained that preliminary conclusions are that you don't have to do it all at once, and that portions would need to be done in the next 20 years. Councilmember Brownrigg discussed how one of the best options for the City is levees. He noted that they are future proof as the City can keep adding to a levee. He explained that the assumption that he and most others have is that you can't build a levee into the Bay. However, he stated that according to Supervisor Dave Pine, BCDC had begun to amend its views concerning sea level rise defense. He stated that the City might want to consider applying to BCDC about building a levee into the Bay. 8 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Councilmember Brownrigg stated that the flooding overtops the creeks and therefore sea level rise is not just about defending the Bayfront but also about the river channels. Mayor Colson stated that the San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District ("District") has officially been formed. She explained that three former districts will be rolled into the main District. She stated that the District would then create subdistricts, and that Burlingame wouldn't be its own subdistrict. Instead, the subdistricts would be created based on their needs and geographic concerns. Councilmember Keighran asked what happens if the City has funding to start work, but the neighboring cities don't have the funds. Mayor Colson explained that the District would be able to assist in obtaining Federal and State funding for sea level rise protection. She noted that the subdistricts would have to work to obtain necessary funding from their respective cities. Mayor Colson discussed the City's current zoning that doesn't allow for housing near the Bayfront. She noted that this decision could change in the future once protections were in place. However, because FEMA rates are increasing, and based on initial findings of the study, it was important to not locate housing on the Bay. Councilmember Ortiz talked about the large projects the City is preparing to undertake. He explained that the City has chosen to utilize bonds to fund the new community center instead of the Capital Reserve fund because the City will need to use those funds for grade separation and sea level rise protection. Vice Mayor Beach thanked Mayor Colson and Councilmember Brownrigg for their work on sea level rise protection. She stated that she was excited that some of the solutions were nature based and could happen sooner rather than later. She asked if the study will prioritize which Reach areas the City needs to focus on first. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative. He noted that the study would give the City a blueprint, but it would take time to prioritize in terms of both implementation and financing. Vice Mayor Beach stated that the City is about to update its zoning code. She asked if the study would impact the updated zoning code. CDD Gardiner stated that he wasn't sure the study would get into specifics to the degree that it would impact the zoning code. He explained that the City currently requires a 75 -foot setback from the shoreline. Councilmember Ortiz asked if BCDC doesn't allow the City to build in the Bay and they can only build a wall, what is the height limit. CDD Gardiner replied that it is approximately 2-4 feet. Councilmember Keighran stated that she is assuming that there are some properties that are more vulnerable than others. She asked how the City is going to incorporate those landowners into these discussions. 9 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Mayor Colson explained that the working group and staff have been doing extensive outreach to involve the community. However, she noted that it has been working better when they talk one-on-one versus holding a community meeting. CDD Gardiner stated that the feedback he has received from various property owners is that they want to know what the plan is and how much it is going to cost. He explained that he believed they see the risk to their asset and want to know how to resolve the matter. Vice Mayor Beach stated that she would like to see visuals of the different types of levees and sea walls. Vice Mayor Beach asked if the Burlingame Lagoon could be utilized to assist with sea level rise protection. Mayor Colson stated that the technical advisory committee's recommendation was to focus on Reach 1 and Reach 2 first. She noted that Reach 4 is a place where the SPUR report recommended sea marshes and more natural vegetation to assist with sea level rise. Mayor Colson stated that the water treatment plant and State Lands' parcel are on higher ground. Councilmember Brownrigg noted that the Topgolf location is also on higher ground. Mayor Colson discussed the Transportation Authority piece of land that the Council had previously considered acquiring. She noted that the recommendation for combating sea level rise on this land was a nature -based approach consisting of a beach and eel grass. She stated that the Council should discuss whether or not they should relook into purchasing this parcel for the City. City Attorney Kane stated that if there is interest in discussing this matter, then it would need to be agendized. Councilmember Keighran stated that it makes sense to put this item on a future agenda. Vice Mayor Beach stated that because of her role on the Transportation Authority, she needs to check with City Attorney Kane on if she can be part of this discussion. Councilmember Brownrigg discussed the State Lands' parcel. He explained that he was looking forward to having 100% open space on the property. He stated that the proposed project would create a natural levee on the property. He explained that the parcel is in Reach 3 near Anza Lagoon, which is one of the first places that will flood. Therefore, he wondered that if the natural levee on the State Lands' parcel could be similarly implemented at Anza Lagoon. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Mayor Colson stated that if anyone was interested in viewing the slides and obtaining more information about the City's work on sea level rise, they could go to www.burlin ag me.org/sealevelrise. 10 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCMENTS a. MAYOR COLSON'S COMMITTEE REPORT 12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Brownrigg asked that Council agendize a discussion of the potential need for a road diet on Trousdale. City Attorney Kane stated that she would discuss the matter with Public Works to determine how best to proceed. Vice Mayor Beach noted that the work on the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan might be a way to address Councilmember Brownrigg's concern. 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlin ag me.org. 14. ADJOURNMENT TO BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY 1. Call to Order Chair Colson called the meeting of the Burlingame Financing Authority to order at 8:46 p.m. 2. Roll Call BOARDMEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, Keighran, Ortiz BOARDMEMBERS ABSENT: None 3. Board Action a. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE BURLINGAME COMMUNITY CENTER, APPROVIGN THE FORMS OF A TRUST AGREEMENT, A FACILITIES LEASE, A FACILITIES SUBLEASE AND A NOTICE OF SALE; APPROVING AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT DESCRIBING SAID BONDS; AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THE TAKING OF ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS Finance Director Augustine stated that the City Council approved the issuance of the lease revenue bonds. She asked that the Burlingame Financing Authority approve the issuance of the bonds. 11 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes Agenda Item 8a Meeting Date: 11/04/2019 Char Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Boardmember Ortiz made a motion to adopt BFA Resolution 001-2019; seconded by Boardmember Brownrigg. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 15. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Colson adjourned meeting at 8:49 p.m. in memory of Jean Laxague. Respectfully submitted, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 12 Burlingame City Council October 21, 2019 Unapproved Minutes CITY To: Date From STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: 8b MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 John Kammeyer, Fire Chief (CCFD) - (650) 558-7601 Subject: Adoption of an Ordinance to Amend Title 17 and Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code and Adoption by Reference of the 2019 California Building Standards Code and the 2018 Edition of the International Fire Code RECOMMENDATION By motion, the City Council should adopt the following ordinance: An Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; Adopting by Reference the 2019 Editions of the California Building Standards Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24 (CCR -T24), State Housing Law, the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, Section 32 (CCR, T-25), 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, 1997 Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and Amendments and Modifications thereto To do so, the Council should: 1. By motion, adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. nigri mginni The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and discussed the proposed amendments at its regular meeting of October 21, 2019. No changes to the proposed ordinance were requested; therefore, the ordinance is presented to the City Council for adoption at its regular meeting of November 4, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT None. Exhibit: • Ordinance 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2019 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24 (CCR -T24), STATE HOUSING LAW, THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 25, DIVISION 1, CHAPTER 1, SUBCHAPTER 1, SECTION 32 (CCR, T-25),2018 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE, 1997 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, 1997 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1997 UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, AND AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO The City Council of the City of Burlingame finds and ordains as follows: DIVISION 1: Section 1. The City of Burlingame is located between the Santa Cruz Mountains foothills and San Francisco Bay, with a number of substantial creeks flowing through highly developed residential and industrial areas. It is surrounded by large areas of open space maintained in natural condition, as well as having a significant natural canyon in the center of the residential area. Strong winds come down the foothills during both the driest and the wettest parts of the year. The City is directly east of the San Andreas Fault, and much of the highly developed part of the City is located along the front of the Bay, much of it on fill. The United States Geologic Survey, the California Division of Mines and Geology, and the Association of Bay Area Governments have extensively mapped the area for such earthquake probabilities. The foothill areas have a variety of soil formations with steep canyons and heavy precipitation. Much of the City has a high water table. Fires in the community could quickly spread because of the extensive, natural vegetation throughout the City. The City has a number of highly developed commercial areas with older buildings, and an industrial area that is filled with mixed uses utilizing various materials that could be highly hazardous. In addition, heavily traveled approach and departure routes for San Francisco International Airport are immediately adjacent to or over the City. The City is also located in a national climate zone that is designated "Very High" on the Termite Infestation Probability Map. The City has worked with other jurisdictions on the San Francisco Peninsula to establish consistent standards to minimize the impact that varying standards might have on development and redevelopment of both residential and commercial buildings. It is only through strong building standards and effective fire prevention and containment programs that citizens will receive the protection they deserve, and that citizens will be able to obtain reasonably priced insurance for their homes and businesses. In seeking to attain these goals, the building standards in Title 18 have been and are adopted. Section 2. In addition, in order to provide appropriate, clear information to applicants for construction approvals, Section 18.07.050 is adopted to conform Title 18 to Zoning Code requirements established in the Municipal Code. It is the intent of the City Council to adopt by reference the 2019 editions of the California Building Standards Codes in its entirety except as specifically amended by this ordinance. Section 3. The City operates its own sanitary sewer system and water quality control plant and is subject to State and Federal laws regarding both point and non -point discharges. Sections 18.07.060, 18.08.010, 18.12.080, 18.12.090, 18.12.100, 18.12.110, 18.12.115, 18.12.120, and 18.12.125 are intended to assist the City in meeting its responsibilities regarding those laws as well as protecting the public safety and welfare. Section 4. The City also operates its own water supply system for its citizens. Sections 18.07.060, 18.12.050, 18.12.060, 18.12.070, and 18.12. 100 are intended to provide consistent policy regarding water service installations and to protect the public's water supply. Section 5. Chapter 18.05 is added and amended to read as follows: Chapter 18.05 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code Sections: 18.05.010 Adoption of the 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code 18.05.020 Section 302.1 amended — Electrical 18.05.030 Section 302.2 amended — Water service and drainage 18.05.040 Section 303 amended - Energy 18.05.010 Adoption of the 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code The rules, regulations and requirements published by the International Code Council (ICC) under the title "2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards for swimming pools and spas within this city as to all matters therein contained with the following amendments: 18.05.020 Section 302.1 amended — Electrical 3 Section 302.1 of the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code is amended to read as follows: 302.1 Electrical. Electrical requirements for aquatic facilities, pools, and spas shall be in accordance with the 2019 California Electrical Code. Exception: Internal wiring for portable residential spas and portable residential exercise spas. 18.05.030 Section 302.2 amended — Water service and drainage. Section 302.2 of the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code is amended to read as follows: 302.2 Water service and drainage. Piping and fittings used for water service, makeup and drainage piping for pools and spas shall comply with the 2019 California Plumbing Code. Fittings shall be listed and approved by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Official (IAPMO) or an equivalent recognized agency and be approved for installation with the piping installed. Section 302.5 of the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code is amended to read as follows: 18.05.040 Section 302.5 amended — Backflow protection. 302.5 Backflow protection. Water supplies for pools and spas shall be protected against backflow in accordance with the 2019 California Plumbing Code. Section 303 of the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code is amended to read as follows: 18.05.050 Section 303 amended — Energy. 303 Energy. The energy consumption of pools and permanent spas shall be controlled by the requirements in sections 303.1.1 through 303.1.3 and comply with the 2019 California Energy Code. Code. Section 6. Chapter 18.06 is added incorporating the 1997 Uniform Housing Chapter 18.06 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE 18.06.010 The 1997 Uniform Housing Code is hereby incorporated as part of the Burlingame Municipal Code. Section 7. Chapter 18.07 is amended by the addition of the following section: Chapter 18.07 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 18.07.120 Section 108 added — Safety assessment placards Section 108 of the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code is added to read as follows: 108 Safety assessment placards. Intent. This section establishes standard placards to be used to indicate the condition of a structure for continued occupancy. The Section further authorizes the Chief Building Official and his or her authorized representatives to post the appropriate placard at each entry point to a building or structure upon completion of a safety assessment. G Application of Provisions. The provisions of this chapter are applicable to all buildings and structures of all occupancies regulated by the City of Burlingame. The City Council may extend the provisions as necessary. Definition. Safety assessment is a visual, non-destructive examination of a building or structure for the purpose of determining the condition for continued occupancy. Placards. (a) The following are verbal descriptions of the official jurisdiction placards to be used to designate the condition for continued occupancy of buildings or structures. Copies of actual placards are attached. INSPECTED - Lawful Occupancy Permitted is to be posted on any building or structure wherein no apparent structural hazard has been found. This placard is not intended to mean that there is no damage to the building or structure. (Green) RESTRICTED USE is to be posted on each building or structure that has been damaged wherein the damage has resulted in some form of restriction to the continued occupancy. The individual who posts this placard will note in general terms the type of damage encountered and will clearly and concisely note the restrictions on continued occupancy. (Yellow) UNSAFE - Do Not Enter or Occupy is to be posted on each building or structure that has been damaged such that continued occupancy poses a threat to life safety. Buildings or structures posted with this placard shall not be entered under any circumstance except as authorized in writing by the Chief Building Official, or his or her authorized representative. Safety assessment teams shall be authorized to enter these buildings at any time. This placard is not to be used or considered as a demolition order. The individual who posts this placard will note in general terms the type of damage encountered. (Red or Orange) (b) The name of the jurisdiction, its address, and phone number shall be permanently affixed to each placard. (c) Once it has been attached to a building or structure, a placard is not to be removed, altered or covered until done so by an authorized representative of the Chief Building Official. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to alter, remove, cover, or deface a placard unless authorized pursuant to this section. INSPECTED LAWFUL OCCUPANCY PERMITTED This structure has been inspected, as indicated below, and no apparent structural hazard has been found. ❑ Inspected Exterior Only ❑ Inspected Exterior and Interior Report any unsafe condition to the City of Burlingame Building Division at 650-558-7260. Re -inspection may be required. Inspector comments: Site/Building Address: Date: Time: a.m./p.m. Caution: Post inspection conditions may increase damage and risk. This facility was inspected under emergency conditions for the City of Burlingame on the date and time noted. Inspected by: Identification #: Agency: DO NOT REMOVE, ALTER, OR COVER THIS PLACARD UNTIL AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF BURLINGAME. (Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 18.07.120) This page blank RESTRICTED USE WARNING: This structure has been inspected and found to be damaged as described below. Damage Comments: Report any unsafe condition to the City of Burlingame Building Division at 650-558-7260. Re -inspection may be required. Entry, occupancy, and lawful use are restricted as follows: Site/Building Address: Date: Time: a.m./p.m. Caution: Post inspection conditions may increase damage and risk. This facility was inspected under emergency conditions for the City of Burlingame on the date and time noted. Inspected by: Identification #: Agency: DO NOT REMOVE, ALTER, OR COVER THIS PLACARD UNTIL AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF BURLINGAME. (Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 18.07.120) This page blank UNSAFE DANGER — DO NOT ENTER OR OCCUPY! WARNING: This structure has been inspected, found to be seriously damaged, and is UNSAFE to enter or occupy as described below. Damage Comments: Report any unsafe condition to the City of Burlingame Building Division at 650-558-7260. Re -inspection may be required. Do not enter or remain in close proximity unless specifically authorized by the City of Burlingame. Entry may result in injury or death. Site/Building Address: Date: Time: a.m./p.m. Caution: Post inspection conditions may increase damage and risk. This facility was inspected under emergency conditions for the City of Burlingame on the date and time noted. Inspected by: Identification #: Agency: DO NOT REMOVE, ALTER, OR COVER THIS PLACARD UNTIL AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF BURLINGAME. (Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 18.07.120) This page blank Section 8. Chapter 18.08 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: Chapter 18.08 BUILDING CODE Sections: 18.08.005 Adoption of 2019 California Building Code, Part 2, Volume 1. 18.08.010 Section 406.1.1 added — Car stacking system backup power 18.08.015 Section 502.1 amended — Address identification. 18.08.020 Section 502.2 added — Utility identification. 18.08.030 Section 903.1.2 added — Additions and alterations. 18.08.035 Section 903.1.3 added — Applicable to all sprinklered buildings. 18.08.040 Section 903.2 amended — Where required. 18.08.045 Section 903.2.21 added — Existing buildings and structures. 18.08.050 Section 903.2.22 added — Aggregate. 18.08.055 Section 903.3.1.4 added — Inspector's test valves. 18.08. 060 Section 903.3.1.5 added — Additional residential sprinkler 18.08.110 locations. 18.08.065 Section 903.4.1 amended — Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Systems 18.08.070 Section 1505.1 amended — Fire classification. 18.08.075 Table 1505.1 amended — Roof minimum fire retardant classes. 18.08.080 Section 1505.1.3 amended — Roof covering within all other areas. 18.08.085 Section 1502.4.1 added — Roof drainage requirements. 18.08.090 Section 1502.4.2 added — Surface drainage requirements. 18.08.095 Adoption of 2019 California Building Code, Part 2, Volume 2. 18.08.100 Section 1807.2.1 amended — Retaining walls. 18.08.105 Section 3005.5 amended — Shunt Trip 18.08.110 Section 3202 amended — Encroachments 18.08.115 Section 3202.1 amended — Encroachments below grade 18.08.120 Section 3202.2 amended — Encroachments above grade and below 8 feet in height 18.08.125 Section 3202.3 amended — Encroachments 8 feet or more above grade 18.08.130 Section 501.6 added — Suspended ceiling upgrade required. 14 18.08.005 Adoption of 2019 California Building Code, Part 2. Volume 1. The rules, regulations and requirements published by the International Code Council (ICC) under the title "2018 International Building Code Volume 1" and adopted as the "2019 California Building Code Volume 1 " including Appendix Chapters I and J and State of California amendments thereto, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained with the following amendments: 18.08.010 Section 406.1.1 added — Car stacking system back up power Section 406. 1.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 406. 1.1 Commercial and Multi -Family Dwelling car stacking systems shall be provided with back-up power to allow access to and egress from such systems during a power outage. The back-up power shall comply with the manufacture specifications and the 2019 California Electrical Code. 18.08.015 Sections 502.1 amended — Address identification. Section 502.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 502.1. Address identification. Address numbers. Size of numbers shall be as follows: 1. When the structure is thirty-six (36) to fifty (50) feet from the street or fire apparatus access, a minimum of one-half inch ('h") stroke by six inches (6") high 15 is required. 2. When the structure is more than fifty (50) feet from the street or fire apparatus access, a minimum of one inch (1 ") strike by nine inches (9") high is required. Multi -Tenant Buildings. Numbers or letters shall be designated on all occupancies within a building. Size shall be a minimum of one-half inch (1/2") stroke by four inches (4") high and on a contrasting background. Directional address numbers or letters shall be provided. Said addresses or numbers shall be posted at a height no greater than 5 feet, 6 inches (5'6") above the finished floor and shall be either internally or externally illuminated in all new construction. Rear addressing. When required by the chief, approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the fire apparatus road at the back of a property or where rear parking lots or alleys provide and acceptable vehicular access. Number stroke and size shall comply with 502.1. ADU Addressing. Address for Residential Accessory Dwelling Units shall meet the City of Burlingame specifications. 18.08.020 Section 502.2 added — Utility identification. Section 502.2 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 502.2 Utility identification. In multi -unit commercial and residential buildings, gas and electric meters, service switches and shut off valves shall be clearly and legibly marked to identify the unit or space that they serve. 16 18.08. 030 Section 903.1.2 added — Additions and alterations. Section 903.1.2 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.1.2 Additions and alterations. The standard for determining the size of addition and/or alteration for determining the threshold for fire sprinkler systems shall be determined by the following: 1. The square footage of every room being added or altered shall be included in the calculation of total square footage of addition or alteration. 2. The entire square footage of an individual room shall be considered added or altered when at least fifty percent (50%) or greater of the linear length of interior wall sheeting or ceiling of any one wall within the room is new, removed, or replaced. 18.08.035 Section 903.1.3 added — Applicable to all sprinklered buildings. Section 903.1.3 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.1.3 Applicable to all sprinklered buildings. 1. When a commercial building is partially retrofitted with an approved automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section, the building owner shall complete the fire extinguishing system retrofit throughout the unprotected building interior areas within six (6) years of completing the initial partial retrofit or within every tenant space where a building permit is obtained, whichever is less. 2. When a residential building is partially retrofitted with an approved automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section, the building fire 17 extinguishing system retrofit shall be completed throughout the unprotected building interior areas within two (2) years from completing the initial partial retrofit. 3. When a property owner or responsible party of a commercial or residential building chooses option 1 or 2 from above, the property owner shall file a deed restriction with San Mateo County Assessor's Office and obtain a performance bond with Central County Fire Department to ensure compliance with Section 18.08.040. The bond shall be equal to or greater than the estimated cost of completion, as determined by Central County Fire Department. 18.08.040 Section 903.2 amended —Where required. Section 903.2 of the 2019 California Building Code is deleted and replaced with the following: Section 903.2 Where required. Approved automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new occupiable and/or habitable buildings and structures. In addition, approved automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be provided in locations described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.21. Exceptions: 1. When approved by the fire chief, canopy structures used solely for vehicular parking which have a photovoltaic system attached are not required to be equipped with a fire sprinkler system as long as the structure meets distance requirements to other structures and property 18 lines. 2. Group U occupancies less than 1200 square feet. 18.08.045 Section 903.2.21 added — Existing buildings and structures. Section 903.2.21 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.2.21 Existing buildings and structures. All existing buildings and structures shall be retroactively protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system when the following conditions exist: 1. Commercial and multi -family residential buildings with a total building floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet or more than two stories in height, and when additions or alterations for which a building permit is required will exceed 1,200 square feet in area. Exception: Group U occupancies less than 1200 square feet. 2. Residential one- and two-family dwellings and structures with a total building floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet or more than two stories in height, and when additions or alterations for which a building permit is required will exceed 750 square feet in area. Exceptions: a. Additions or alterations of commercial and multi -family residential buildings that do not exceed 20% of the completed building's total replacement cost calculation. The replacement cost calculations for the additions/alterations and the completed building shall be calculated utilizing the latest Building Valuation Data (BVD) published by the IN International Code Council (ICC). b. Additions or alterations to residential one- and two-family dwellings and structures that do not exceed 20% of the total square footage of the entire completed building. c. The cost of additions and alterations used in calculating the replacement cost value formula shall be exclusive of the cost to design and install an automatic fire sprinkler extinguishing system pursuant to this section; building roof repair/replacement; fire damage repair; building heating and/or cooling unit repair/replacement; and any other federal, state and local construction code upgrade requirements including but not limited to the seismic retrofit requirements, asbestos, and other hazardous material abatement. 18.08.050 Section 903.2.22 added — Aggregate. Section 903.2.22 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.2.22 Aggregate. The size or cost of additions and alterations used in calculating the size or replacement cost value formula shall not be cumulative with regard to individual additions or alterations in a building unless the following circumstance applies: 1. Where more than one (1) addition or alteration for which building permits are required are made within a two (2) year period from the final date of the initial permit,_the sum of the square footage or replacement costs of these additions or alterations during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for the purpose of 20 determining calculations in Section 18.08.050. 18.08.055 Section 903.3.1.4 added — Inspector's test valves. Section 903.3.1.4 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.3.1.4 Inspector's test valves. Single-family residential fire sprinkler systems within buildings greater than 3600 square feet -shall be equipped with an inspector's test valve for each system and located the furthest point away from the sprinkler riser. 18.08.060 Section 903.3.1.5 and 903.3.1.6 added — Additional sprinkler locations. Section 903.3.1.5 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 903.3.1.5 Additional residential sprinkler locations. The installation of a residential fire sprinkler system shall conform to the following: 1. Sprinklers shall be required throughout carports and garages. Exception: Detached carports and garages less than 2,000 square feet in area and separated from residential buildings complying with Section 503.1.2 and Table 602 of the building code and assuming a property line between all other structures. 2. Sprinkler coverage shall be provided in the following locations: a. Attic access openings b. Areas of attics and crawl spaces containing storage, mechanical and/or electrical equipment. 21 Section 903.3.1.6, CFC is added to read as follows: 903.3.1.6 Additional Commercial and Multi -family Dwelling Sprinkler Locations. Rooms or spaces which contain vehicle parking lifts or stacking systems shall be designed as an Extra Hazard Classification. Sprinkler design to include sidewall sprinkler heads designed at minimum Ordinary Group 2 in between each level. Exception: Buildings classified as single-family dwellings. 18.08.065 Section 903.4.1 Amended - Monitoring. Section 903.4.1 CBC is amended by adding the following: Section 903.4.1 Monitoring. For new fire sprinkler monitoring systems, the approved supervisory station shall be defined as a UL approved central receiving station. 18.08.070 Section 1505.1 amended — Fire classification. The first paragraph of Section 1505.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is amended to read as follows: 1505.1 General. Roof assemblies shall be divided into the classes defined below. Class A or Class B roof assemblies and roof coverings required to be listed by this section shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E 108 or UL 790. In addition, fire -retardant -treated wood roof coverings shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D 2898. The minimum roof coverings installed on buildings shall comply with the Table 1505.1 as amended. 18.08.075 Table 1505.1 amended — Roof minimum fire retardant classes. 22 Table No. 1505.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is amended to read as follows: Table 1505.1 Roof minimum fire retardant classes. TABLE NO. 1505.1$ MINIMUM ROOF COVERING CLASSIFICATION FOR TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION Type IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB Roof Covering B B B B B B B B B a. Unless otherwise required in accordance with Chapter 7A. 18.08.080 Section 1505.1.3 amended — Roof covering within all other areas. Section 1505.1.3 of the 2019 California Building Code is amended to read as follows: 1505.1.3 Roof covering within all other areas. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire -retardant roof covering that is at least Class B. 18.08.085 Section 1502.4.1 added — Roof drainage requirements. Section 1502.4.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 1502.4.1 Roof drainage requirements. In all zones other than R-1, the water from the 23 roof of any building and from any paved area which would flow by gravity over public sidewalk shall be carried by means of conductors under the sidewalk and through the curb to the gutter, or other approved location. 18.08.090 Section 1502.4.2 added — Surface drainage requirements. Section 1502.4.2 of the 2019 California Building Code is added to read as follows: 1502.4.2 Surface drainage requirements. No storm water or underground water draining from any lot, building, or paved area shall be allowed to drain to adjacent properties nor shall this water be connected to the city's sanitary sewer system. Regardless of the slope of the source property, such water shall drain to either artificial or natural storm drainage facilities by gravity or pumping. 1808.095 Adoption of 2019 California Building Code, Part 2, Volume 2. The rules, regulations and requirements published by the International Code Council under the title "2018 International Building Code Volume 2" and adopted as the "2019 California Building Code Volume 2" are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city and as to all matters therein contained with the following amendments: 18.08.100 Section 1807.2.1 amended — Retaining walls. 24 Section 1807.2.1 of the 2019 California Building Code is amended by adding the following paragraphs at the end of the section: 1807.2.1 General. When a structure is to support a lateral load which retains fill which supports another structure, supports the toe of a slope which is over four feet in height measured from the bottom of the footing, or is required by the city engineer, it shall be designed by a licensed architect or engineer and approved by the city engineer. The following types of retaining walls shall be of concrete or other material which shall have a minimum service life of 75 years for all major support systems and 50 years for all replaceable support systems: Walls that are engineered, support a lateral load over 18" at property line, support an engineered surcharge, support a structure, or support a toe of a slope. A fence structure may not be substituted for a retaining wall. 18.08.105 Section 3005.5 amended — Shunt Trip Section 3005.5 of the 2019 California Building Code is amended by adding the following: 3005.5 Shunt Trip Prohibited. Where elevator hoist ways and/or elevator machine rooms containing elevator control equipment are located within buildings equipped with automatic fire sprinklers, the following is required in lieu of a shunt trip: 1. The elevator machine room shall be constructed with the minimum fire rating as the hoist way. 2. Fire sprinklers at the top of the hoist way and inside the elevator machine room shall not be installed. 25 3. Means for elevator shutdown shall not be installed. 18.08.110 Section 3202 amended Encroachments Section 3202 of the 2019 California Building Code is deleted and replaced with the following: 18.08.115 3202.1— Encroachments below grade 3201.1 Encroachments below grade. Encroachments below grade that act as temporary support to build the structure shall be allowed per the City Fee Schedule under "Special Encroachment Permits" at the time of the building permit issuance. An agreement for the encroachments shall be in place prior to the commencement of the construction work. 18.08.120 Section 3202.2 is amended — Encroachments above grade and below 8 feet in height 3202.2 Encroachments above grade and below 8 feet in height. Encroachments into the public right-of-way above grade and below 8 feet in height shall comply with the City Municipal Code Chapter 22.26 Awning, Canopy and Marquee signs. Doors and windows shall not open or project into the public right-of-way. 18.08.125 Section 3202.3 is amended - Encroachments 8 feet or more above grade. 3202.3 Encroachments 8 feet or more above grade. Encroachments into the public right-of-way 8 feet or more above grade shall comply with the City Municipal Code Chapter 22.26 Awning, Canopy and Marquee signs. All other encroachments such as, but not limited to, windows, balconies, architectural features and mechanical equipment shall not project into the public right-of-way. 961 18.08.130 Section 501.6 added — Suspended ceiling upgrade required. Section 501.6 of the 2019 California Existing Building Code is added to read as follows: 501.6 Suspended ceiling upgrade required. When an addition, alteration or repair is performed on an occupancy in which there is an existing suspended ceiling, such suspended ceilings shall be modified throughout to comply with the provisions of ASTM C 635 and ASTM C 636. Section 9. Section 18.09.010 is amended to read as follows: Chapter 18.09 Mechanical Code Section: 18.09.010 Adoption of 2019 California Mechanical Code. The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), under the title "2018 Uniform Mechanical Code" and adopted as the "2019 California Mechanical Code," including the appendices and State of California amendments thereto, hereinafter called "mechanical code," is adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The appendices to the mechanical code shall be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the code. 27 Section 10. Chapter 18.10 is added to read as follows: Chapter 18.10 RESIDENTIAL CODE Sections: 18.10.010 Adoption of 2019 California Residential Code. 18.10.015 Section R111.4 added — Utility identification. 18.10.020 Section R309.5 deleted — Fire sprinklers. 18.10.025 Section R313.1 amended — Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. 18.10.030 Section R313.2 amended — One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. 18.10.035 Section R313.3.1.1 amended — Required sprinkler locations. 18.10.040 Section R313.3.2.7 added — Additions and alterations. 18.10.045 Section R313.3.2.8 added — All sprinklered buildings. 18.10.050 Section R313.3.3.1 amended — Nonmetallic pipe and tubing. 18.10.055 Table R313.3.6.2 (9) deleted — Table R313.3.6.2 (9) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 -inch PEX tubing 18.10.060 Section R313.3.6.2.2 amended — Calculation procedure. Step 8 — Determine the maximum allowable pipe length 18.10.065 Section R313.3.8.1 amended — Pre -concealment inspection. #4 18.10.070 Section R313.3.8.1 amended — Pre -concealment inspection. #5 18.10.075 Section R319.1 amended — Address numbers. 18.10.080 Section R902.1 amended — Roof covering materials. 18.10.085 Section R902.1.3 amended — Roof covering in all other areas. 18.10.090 Section R903.4.2 added — Roof and surface drainage. 18.10.095 Section R1003.9.2.1 added — Spark arrestors. 18.10.010 Adoption of 2019 California Residential Code. The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the International Code Council under the title "2018 International 28 Residential Code" and adopted as the "2019 California Residential Code", including appendices H, J, K, O, Q, S, V, and X are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to matters therein contained except as provided in this chapter. The mandatory requirements of any adopted appendices to the code shall be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the code. 18.10.015 Section R111.4 added — Utility identification. Section R111.4 of the 2019 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: 11111.4 Utility identification. In all residential buildings, gas and electric meters, service switches and shut off valves shall be clearly and legibly marked to identify the unit or space that they serve. 18.10.020 Section R309.6 deleted — Fire sprinklers Exception. Section R309.6 Exception of the 2019 California Residential Code is deleted in its entirety. R309.6 Fire sprinklers. The exception for fire sprinklers in garages and carports is deleted in its entirety. 18.10.025 Section R313.1 amended — Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. Section R313.1 Exception of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended by 29 replacing with the following paragraph: R313.1. Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in townhouses. R.313.1.1 Existing Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system is required when additions and/or alterations to existing townhouse buildings with a total building floor area more than 2,000 square feet or more than two stories in height, and when additions or alterations for which a building permit is required exceeds 750 square feet in area or 20% of the total square footage of the entire completed building. Exception: Detached structures classified as an Accessory Dwelling Unit in accordance with Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 25.59 and no work has occurred in the main residence to require an automatic residential fire sprinkler system. 18.10.030 Section R313.2 amended — One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. Section R313.2 Exception of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended by replacing with the following: R313.2. One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in one - and two-family dwellings. Exception: Detached structures located in excess of 10 feet from the main 30 house. For the purposes of fire sprinklers, detached structures shall be considered as portions of the main home when buildings are not separated in accordance with Section 705.3 of the California Building Code. R313.2.1 Existing One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system is required when additions and/or alterations to existing townhouse buildings with a total building floor area more than 2,000 square feet or more than two stories in height, and when additions or alterations for which a building permit is required exceeds 750 square feet in area or 20% of the total square footage of the entire completed building. Exception: Detached structures located in excess of 10 feet from the main house. For the purposes of fire sprinklers, detached structures shall be considered as portions of the main home when buildings are not separated in accordance with Section 705.3 of the California Building Code. 2. Detached structures classified as an Accessory Dwelling Unit in accordance with Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 25.59 when no work has occurred in the main house in a two-year period in excess of 750 square feet in area or 20% of the total square footage of the entire completed building as determined by Section R313.3.2.7 18.10.035 Section R313.3.1.2 amended — Required sprinkler locations. 31 Section R313.3.1.2 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended by replacing with the following: R313.3.1.1 Required sprinkler locations. 1. Sprinklers shall be installed to protect all areas of a dwelling unit. Exceptions: a. Clothes closets, linen closets and pantries not exceeding 24 square feet (2.2m2) in area, with the smallest dimension not greater than 3 feet (915 mm) and having wall and ceiling surfaces of gypsum board. b. Detached carports and garages less than 2,000 square feet in area and separated from residential buildings complying with Section R302.1. 2. Sprinkler coverage shall be provided in the following locations: a. Attic access openings b. Areas of attics and crawl spaces containing storage, mechanical and/or electrical equipment. 3. Inspector Test Valves shall be provided for each system and located the furthest point away from the sprinkler riser for buildings greater than 3,600 square feet. 18.10.040 Section R313.3.2.7 added — Additions and alterations. Section R313.3.2.7 of the 2019 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: R313.3.2.7 Additions and Alterations. 32 1. The standard for determining the size of addition and/or alteration for determining the threshold for fire sprinkler systems shall be determined by the following: a. The square footage of every room being added or altered shall be included in the calculation of total square footage of addition or alteration. b. The entire square footage of an individual room shall be considered added or altered when at least fifty percent (50%) or greater of the linear length of interior wall sheeting or ceiling of any one wall within the room is new, removed, or replaced. 2. The size or cost of additions and alterations used in calculating the size shall not be cumulative with regard to individual additions or alterations in a building unless the following circumstance applies: Where more than one (1) addition or alteration for which building permits are required are made within a two (2) year period from the final date of the initial permit, the sum of the size of these additions or alterations during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for the purpose of determining calculations in Section 18.10.025 or Section 18.10.030. The cost of additions and alterations used in calculating the replacement cost value formula shall be exclusive of the cost to design and install an automatic fire sprinkler extinguishing system pursuant to this section; building roof repair/replacement; fire damage repair;_building heating and/or cooling unit repair/replacement; and any other federal, state and local construction code upgrade requirements including but not limited to the seismic retrofit 33 requirements, asbestos, and other hazardous material abatement. 18.10.045 Section R313.3.2.8 added — All sprinklered buildings. Section R313.3.2.8 of the 2019 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: R313.3.2.8 All sprinklered buildings. When a building is partially retrofitted with an approved automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section, the building fire extinguishing system retrofit shall be completed throughout the unprotected building interior areas within two (2) years from completing the initial partial retrofit. 2. When a property owner or responsible party of a residential building chooses option 1 above, the property owner shall file a deed restriction with San Mateo County Assessor's Office and obtain a performance bond with Central County Fire Department to ensure compliance with Section 18.10.025 or 18.10.030. The bond shall be equal to or greater than the estimated cost of completion, as determined by Central County Fire Department. 18.10.050 Section R313.3.3.1 amended — Nonmetallic pipe and tubing. Section R313.3.3.1 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended to read as follows: R313.3.3.1 Nonmetallic pipe and tubing. Nonmetallic piping and tubing, such as CPVC, shall be listed for use in residential 34 fire sprinkler systems. 18.10.055 Table R313.3.6.2 (9) deleted — Table R313.3.6.2 (9) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 -inch PEX tubing Table R313.3.6.2 (9) of the 2019 California Residential Code is deleted in its entirety. Table R313.3.6.2 (9) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 -inch PEX tubing is deleted. 18.10.060 Section R313.3.6.2.2 amended — Calculation procedure. Step 8 — Determine the maximum allowable pipe length Section R313.3.6.2.2 — Calculation procedure. Step 8 of the 2019 California Residential Code is replaced with the following: R313.3.6.2.2 — Calculation procedure. Step 8 — Determine the maximum allowable pipe length Use Tables R313.3.6.2 (4) through R313.3.6.2 (8) to select a material and size for water distribution piping. The piping material and size shall be acceptable if the developed length of pipe between the service valve and the most remote sprinkler does not exceed the maximum allowable length specified by the applicable table. Interpolation of Pt between the tabular values shall be permitted. The maximum allowable length of piping in Tables R313.3.6.2(4) through R313.3.6.2(8) incorporates an adjustment for pipe fittings, and no additional consideration of friction losses associated with pipe fittings shall be required. 18.10.065 Section R313.3.8.1 amended — Pre -concealment inspection. #4 35 Section R313.3.8.1 — Pre -concealment inspection. #4 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended by replacing with the following: R313.3.8.1 #4. The pipe size equals or exceeds the size used in applying Tables R313.3.6.2(4) through R313.3.6.2(8) or, if the piping system was hydraulically calculated in accordance with Section R313.3.6.1, the size used in the hydraulic calculation. 18.10.070 Section R313.3.8.1 amended — Pre -concealment inspection. #5 Section R313.3.8.1 — Pre -concealment inspection. #5 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended by replacing with the following: R313.3.8.1 #5 The pipe length does not exceed the length permitted by Tables R313.3.6.2 (4) through R313.3.6.2 (8) or, if the piping system was hydraulically calculated in accordance with Section R313.3.6.1, pipe lengths and fittings do not exceed those used in the hydraulic calculation 18.10.075 Section R319.1 amended — Address numbers. Section R319.1 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended to read as follows: R319.1 Address numbers. Size of numbers shall be as follows: 1. When the structure is thirty-six (36) to fifty (50) feet from the street or fire apparatus access, a minimum of one-half inch ('h") stroke by six inches (6") high is required. 36 2. When the structure is more than fifty (50) feet from the street or fire apparatus access, a minimum of one inch (1 ") strike by nine inches (9") high is required. Multi -tenant buildings. Numbers or letters shall be designated on all occupancies within a building. Size shall be a minimum of one-half inch (1/2") stroke by four inches (4") high and on a contrasting background. Directional address numbers or letters shall be provided. Said addresses or numbers shall be posted at a height no greater than 5 feet, 6 inches (5' 6") above the finished floor and shall be either internally or externally illuminated in all new construction. Rear addressing. When required by the chief, approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the fire apparatus road at the back of a property or where rear parking lots or alleys provide and acceptable vehicular access. Number stroke and size shall comply with R319.1. ADU Addressing. Address for Residential Accessory Dwelling Units shall meet City of Burlingame specifications. 18.10.080 Section R902.1 amended — Roof covering materials. Section R902.1 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended to read as follows: R902.1 Roof covering materials. Roofs shall be covered with materials as set forth in Sections R904 and R905. A minimum Class A or B roofing shall be installed in areas designated by this section. Class C roofs shall not be allowed 37 in the City of Burlingame. Classes A and B roofing required by this section to be listed shall be tested in accordance with UL 790 or ASTM E 108. 18.10.085 Section R902.1.3 amended — Roof covering in all other areas. Section R902.1.3 of the 2019 California Residential Code is amended to read as follows: R902.1.3 Roof covering in all other areas. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire -retardant roof covering that is at least Class B. 18.10.090 Section R903.4.2 added — Roof and surface drainage. Section R903.4.2 of the 2019 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: R903.4.2 Roof and surface drainage. 1. In all zones other than R- 1, the water from the roof of any building and from any paved area which would flow by gravity over public 38 sidewalk shall be carried by means of conductors under the sidewalk and through the curb to the gutter, or other approved location. 2. No storm water or underground water draining from any lot, building, or paved area shall be allowed to drain to adjacent properties nor shall this water be connected to the city's sanitary sewer system. Regardless of the slope of the source property, such water shall drain to either artificial or natural storm drainage facilities by gravity or pumping. 18.10.095 Section R1003.9.2.1 added — Spark arrestors. Section R1003.9.2.1 of the 2019 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: R1003.9.2.1 Spark arrestors. Every chimney shall have a spark arrestor, either internally or externally mounted. Any spark arrestor to be mounted internally shall not be installed until installation plans for such arrestor have been submitted to and approved by the building division. All chimneys as described in section 603.6 of the 2019 California Fire Code shall be retroactively protected when one or more of the following conditions exist: 1. Upon the sale or transfer of the real property on which any chimney is located the transfer of title shall not be made until each such chimney contains the required spark arrestor, properly installed and in proper working order. 39 2. In the event of any construction on such property for which a building permit is required the final building permit signoff shall not be made until each such chimney a spark arrestor has been installed and is in proper working order. Section 11. Chapter 18.12 is amended to read as follows: Chapter 18.12 PLUMBING CODE Sections: 18.12.010 Adoption of 2019 California Plumbing Code. 18.12.020 Section 310.13 added — Exterior pipes. 18.12.030 Section 507.5 amended — Water heater safety pans. 18.12.040 Section 606.3.1 added — Water supply shutoff valves. 18.12.050 Section 609.3 amended — Water piping installed in or under a concrete slab. 18.12.060 Section 610.8.1 added — Water service over two inches. 18.12.070 Section 710.1 amended — Drainage of fixtures below the next upstream manhole or below the main sewer level. 18.12.080 Section 719.7 added — Building sewer cleanout. 18.12.090 Section 807.2 amended — Condensate waste water disposal. 18.12.100 Section 812.2 added — Disposal of rainwater drainage. 18.12.110 Section 812.3 added — Rainwater drainage to paved gutter. 18.12.120 Section 812.4 added — Rainwater drainage across public sidewalk prohibited. 18.12.130 Section 812.5 added — Elimination of nonconforming rainwater drainage required. 18.12.010 Adoption of 2019 California Plumbing Code. The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), under the title 40 "2018 Uniform Plumbing Code" and adopted as the "2019 California Plumbing Code" including the appendices A, D, H, I and State of California amendments thereto, hereinafter called "plumbing code," is adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The appendices specified herein shall be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the plumbing code. 18.12.020 Section 310.13 added — Exterior pipes. Section 310.13 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 310.13 Exterior pipes. No plumbing drain vent pipe nor water, soil, waste, or gas pipe shall be installed on, or attached to, the outside face of an exterior wall of a residential building without the prior written permission of the building official. Such installation shall be enclosed in such a way as to be obscured from view. 18.12.030 Section 507.5 amended — Water heater safety pans. Section 507.5 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is amended to read as follows: 507.5 Water heater safety pans. Each water heater located in an attic, furred space, living area or other location where leakage would result in damage to the building or its contents shall have a safety pan with drain. Safety pans shall be metal and be nominal two inches in diameter larger than the water heater, with a minimum depth of two inches. The drain pipe shall be three-quarter inch trade size minimum; shall terminate outside the building 8/13/2019 41 foundation or, where this is not practical or possible, at another location approved by the building inspector; and shall have a continuous minimum slope throughout its length of one-quarter inch, per foot away from the water heater. 18.12.040 Section 606.3.1 added — Water supply shutoff valves. Section 606.3.1 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 606.3.1 Water supply shutoff valves. A gate shutoff valve shall be installed on each water supply pipe at an accessible point where such supply enters a building. In multi -unit residential buildings, a gate shutoff valve shall be installed on each water supply pipe at an accessible point where such supply enters each apartment or dwelling unit; or, where an apartment or dwelling unit is supplied by a vertical riser, a separate accessible shutoff valve may be provided at each plumbing fixture in the unit in lieu of the shutoff valve on the main supply to the unit. 18.12.050 Section 609.3 amended — Water piping installed in or under a concrete slab. The first paragraph of Section 609.3 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is amended to read as follows: 609.3 Water piping installed in or under a concrete slab. Water piping shall not be installed in or under a concrete floor slab within a building without prior written approval of the building official. When such approval is obtained, such piping shall be installed in accordance with requirements (1) and (2). 8/13/2019 42 18.12.060 Section 610.8.1 added — Water service over two inches. Section 610.8.1 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 610.8.1 Water services over two inches. Design details, methods and materials for construction of water services over 2 inches in diameter shall conform with the specifications for the construction of such work as compiled by the city engineer. These specifications may be changed from time to time at the option of the city engineer, but such changes shall in no way effect the validity of the regulations or requirements contained therein or the regulations and requirements of this code. 18.12.070 Section 710.1 amended — Drainage of fixtures below the next upstream manhole or below the main sewer level. Section 710.1 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is amended to read as follows: 710.1 Drainage of fixtures below the next upstream manhole or below the main sewer level. 1. Drainage piping serving fixture(s) which have flood level rim(s) less than twelve inches (12") above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage as follows: a. In new buildings and in buildings modified to the extent described in Burlingame Municipal Code section 18.07.020, these fixtures shall discharge by means of a sewage ejector or pump in accordance with Section 710.2. 8/13/2019 43 b. In existing buildings, protection from backflow shall be by means of a backwater valve approved by the building official supplemented by an approved sewer relief valve installed with its outlet at least six inches (6") below the flood level rim of the lowest installed drainage unit fixture. Fixtures above that elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve without prior written approval of the building official. As an alternative, the system may be protected by installation of an approved sewage ejector or pump. C. Cleanouts for drains that pass through a backwater valve shall be clearly identified with a permanent label stating "Backwater Valve Downstream". 18.12.080 Section 719.7 added — Building sewer cleanout. Section 719.7 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is amended by adding a second paragraph to read as follows: 719.7 Building sewer cleanout. When a building sewer is located under a street, alley or easement, there shall be provided a cleanout, installed flush with the sidewalk level next to curb; or, if no curb or sidewalk exist, then the cleanout must be located outside of the lot line. The cleanout riser shall be of materials specified by the city engineer, shall be the same size as the drain it serves, shall be connected to the building drain by a wye, shall be brought up to the level of the ground, and shall be terminated at the top with a cleanout fitting as specified by the city engineer. If the riser terminates at concrete sidewalk a cast iron sidewalk box with loose cover fitting with brass screws shall be installed. The minimum size for a cleanout riser shall be four inch trade size pipe. 8/13/2019 44 18.12.090 Section 807.4 Added — Condensate waste water disposal. Section 807.4 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 807.4 Condensate wastewater disposal. Condensate from air cooling coils and comfort cooling equipment not intended to be used for the storage or handling of food or drink shall be collected and discharged to a storm sewer or other point of disposal approved by the building official. Termination of such drains shall be made by an air break. Condensate drain lines in sizes of one and one-quarter inch and larger shall be assembled using approved drainage pipe and fittings. Condensate waste water shall not drain over or upon a sidewalk, pedestrian ramp or the like, or a public way. 18.12.100 Section 812.2 added — Disposal of rainwater drainage. Section 812.2 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 812.2 Disposal of rainwater drainage. Rainwater from roof or other approved areas exposed to rainwater may be drained into the storm drainage system, but shall not drain into any sewer intended for sanitary sewage. 18.12.110 Section 812.3 added — Rainwater drainage to paved gutter. Section 812.3 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 8/13/2019 45 812.3 Rainwater drainage to paved gutter. Rainwater from roofs and other approved areas exposed to rainwater may drain into a public street gutter, provided that such gutter is paved and runs to a catch basin connected to a public storm drain, and provided further that such drainage has the approval of the city engineer or other public authority having jurisdiction over public streets or public storm drains. 18.12.120 Section 812.4 added — Rainwater drainage across public sidewalk prohibited. Section 812.4 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 812.4 Rainwater drainage across public sidewalk prohibited. No rainwater from roofs, or other rainwater drainage of premises, shall discharge upon a public sidewalk. When it is desired to conduct rainwater from a building or premises to a public street gutter, the outside underground drainage piping shall be vitrified clay pipe, ABS, PVC, galvanized wrought iron pipe, galvanized steel pipe, approved concrete pipe, asbestos cement sewer pipe, cast iron pipe or other materials approved by the building official. When clay pipe, ABS, PVC, asbestos cement sewer pipe or approved concrete pipe is used, such pipe shall be a minimum of two feet horizontally from the building and one foot below the official grade. Water leaders connected to such background drainage pipe which are on the outside of the building wall that abuts on a public thoroughfare, shall be constructed of galvanized wrought iron pipe, galvanized steel pipe, or cast iron pipe for a distance of not less than five feet vertically above the Official grade. See Section 18.08.090 for exception for such drainage in R-1 districts. 8/13/2019 46 18.12.130 Section 812.5 added — Elimination of nonconforming rainwater drainage required. Section 812.5 of the 2019 California Plumbing Code is added to read as follows: 812.5 Elimination of nonconforming rainwater drainage required. Every existing system that allows the drainage of rainwater into a sanitary sewer in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be altered or terminated or replaced so as to conform to the provisions of this chapter. Section 12. Section 18.13.010 is added to read as follows: Chapter 18.13 Existing Building Code Section: 18.13.010 Adoption of 2019 California Existing Building Code. The rules, regulations and requirements published by the International Code Council (ICC) under the title "2015 International Existing Building Code" and adopted as the "2019 California Existing Building Code" including Appendix Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16 and State of California amendments thereto, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained. Section 13. Chapter 18.16 is amended to read as follows: 8/13/2019 47 Chapter 18.16 ELECTRICAL CODE Sections: 18.16.010 Adoption of 2019 California Electrical Code. 18.16.020 Section 230.70 (A) (1) amended — Main switch accessible from exterior. 18.16.030 Section 410.10(G) added — Exterior lighting restricted. 18.16.010 Adoption of 2019 California Electrical Code. The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), under the title "2017 National Electrical Code" with amendments as contained in the "2019 California Electrical Code", including the appendices, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to matters therein contained except as provided in this chapter. The mandatory requirements of the appendices to the code shall be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the code. 18.16.020 Section 230.70 (A) (1) amended — Main switch accessible from exterior. Section 230.70 (A) (1) of the 2019 California Electrical Code is amended to read as follows: 230.70 (A) (1) Main switch accessible from exterior. The service disconnecting means 8/13/2019 48 location shall be accessible from the exterior of a building. If, due to structural or architectural conditions, it is not possible to make the service disconnecting means accessible from the building exterior a shunt trip disconnecting all active electrical conductors shall be installed at an accessible exterior location. 18.16.030 Section 410.10(G) added — Exterior lighting restricted. Section 410.10(G) of the 2019 California Electrical Code is added to read as follows: 410.10(G) Exterior lighting restricted. 1. Exterior lighting on all residential and commercial properties shall be designed and located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the lighting element is kept entirely on the property or below the top of any fence, edge or wall. 2. On all residential properties exterior lighting outlets and fixtures shall not be located more than nine (9) feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls shall not be floodlit; only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward shall be allowed, except for illuminated street numbers required by the fire department. 3. Variances to the provisions of this section may be approved by the planning commission, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 25.16 of this code, except that notice of the application for the variance shall only be given to property owners within fifty feet. 8/13/2019 49 4. This section shall not apply to signs having an approved permit for an illuminated sign pursuant to Title 22 of this code. Chapter 18.30 Green Building Standards Code Section: 18.30.010 Adoption of 2019 California Green Building Standards Code. The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the International Code Council (ICC), under the title "2019 California Green Building Standards Code" adopted as the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code," including appendix chapter A4 and the State of California amendments thereto, is adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Appendix chapter A4 of the Green Building Standards Code shall be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the code. Section 14. An application for a building permit received after December 31, 2019 must comply with this Ordinance unless specific land use provisions for the project were approved by the City of Burlingame prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2019. If the Planning Commission approves the project prior to the effective date of this ordinance, then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2016 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856- 2010, 1889-2013 and 1933-2016 as applicable. 8/13/2019 50 Section 15. This ordinance shall be effective DIVISION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. DIVISION 3: This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 2020, or when the ordinance is filed with the Building Standards Commission, whichever occurs later. Donna Colson, Mayor 8/13/2019 51 I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21 st day of October, 2019, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of November 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk 8/13/2019 52 To: Date: From: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: 8c MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Kevin Gardiner, Director of Community Development — (650) 558-7253 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for Plan Check and Building Inspection Services for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 to Increase the Contract Amount by $700,000 to Cover Expected Expenses Related to the Burlingame Point Development Proiect RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., increasing the contract amount by $700,000 to cover additional plan check and building inspection services in Fiscal Year 2019-2020 as a result of the submittal of Building Permit Applications to the Building Division for the "Burlingame Point" tenant improvements located at 301, 307, 311 and 333 Airport Boulevard. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On October 6, 1992, the City of Burlingame Building Division entered into a contract with Linhart Petersen Powers Associates for building inspection and plan check services. On October 31, 2006, Linhart Petersen Powers Associates was acquired by Bureau Veritas NA (BV), an international company. The Building Permit/Plan Check fees paid by applicants cover the costs of BV's services to the City. As such, these are considered to be pass-through fees. The increased amount of $700,000 that is being requested by the City's Chief Building Official is based on plan check and inspection services for the "Burlingame Point" Tenant Improvements (TI) at 301, 307, 311 and 333 Airport Boulevard. In particular, there has been an unanticipated increase in plan check services in this current fiscal year due to an accelerated timeframe for tenant improvements in the project. The general terms of the agreement for services with Bureau Veritas have not changed, with the exception that the Building Official was able to negotiate lower plan check fees (due to project scale) for the referenced major construction project. 1 Bureau Veritas North America Contract FISCAL IMPACT November 4, 2019 There is no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund, as building permit plan check fees, which are taken in at the time of the initial applicant submittal, cover the cost of Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. services. Any funds that are remaining at the end of the fiscal year are put into the building enterprise fund reserves. Exhibits: • Resolution • Original Agreement 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $700,000 TO COVER PLAN CHECK AND BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES RELATED TO THE BURLINGAME POINT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, on July 5, 2016, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for plan check and building inspection services required by the Community Development Department — Building Division, in the amount of $360,000; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2016, the City Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., increasing the contract amount by $419,000 to cover additional plan check and building inspection services in Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as a result of two major construction projects that necessitated engaging the services of the vendor to a greater degree than budgeted for Fiscal Year 2016-2017; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2019, the City Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., increasing the contract amount by $300,000 to cover additional plan check and building inspection services in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 as a result of two major construction projects that necessitated engaging the services of the vendor to a greater degree than budgeted for Fiscal Year 2018-2019; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department — Building Division has received Building Permit Applications for major Tenant Improvement (TI) construction projects that will necessitate engaging the services of the vendor to a greater degree than budgeted for Fiscal Year 2019-2020, and therefore an amendment to the maximum amount to be expended under the terms of the current Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. is necessary; and WHEREAS, all costs for plan check and permit fees are passed through to project proponents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North RESOLUTION NO. America, Inc. for plan check and inspection services, increasing the contracted amount by $700,000. 2. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the City Manager upon execution of the Professional Services Agreement. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the 4th day of November, 2019 and as adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk 2 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is by and between BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and the City of Burlingame, a public body of the State of California. Consultant and City agree: 1. Services. Consultant shall provide the Services set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2. Compensation. Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum compensation amount, Consultant agrees to perform all of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A for the compensation defined in Exhibit B. Consultant shall submit invoices on a monthly basis. All bills submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information to determine whether the amount deemed due and payable is accurate. Bills shall include a brief description of services performed, the date services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, a brief description of any costs incurred and the Consultant's signature. 3. Term. This Agreement commences on full execution hereof and terminates on June 30, 2019 with options to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms. Consultant agrees to diligently prosecute the services to be provided under this Agreement to completion and in accordance with any schedules specified herein. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence. Time extensions for delays beyond the Consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator prior to the expiration of the specified completion date. 4. Assignment and Subcontracting. A substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or subcontracted by Consultant without the prior written approval of City. It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. 5. Insurance. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall carry, maintain for the duration of the Agreement, and provide proof thereof, acceptable to the City, the insurance coverages specified in Exhibit B, "City Insurance Requirements," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of required insurance coverage prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance to City. 6. Indemnification. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold City, its directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against any and all liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of, pertaining or relating to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors, or agents, or on account of the performance or character of the Services, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. It is understood that the duty of Consultant to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for any design professional services, the duty to defend and indemnify City shall be limited to that allowed pursuant to California Civil Code section 2782.8. Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages. 7. Termination and Abandonment. This Agreement may be cancelled at any time by City for its convenience upon written notice to Consultant. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall be entitled to pro -rated compensation for authorized Services performed prior to the effective date of termination provided however that City may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant's delivery to City of any or all materials described herein. In the event the Consultant ceases performing services under this Agreement or otherwise abandons the project prior to completing all of the Services described in this Agreement, Consultant shall, without delay, deliver to City all materials and records prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid for the reasonable value of the authorized Services performed up to the time of Consultant's cessation or abandonment, less a deduction for any damages or additional expenses which City incurs as a result of such cessation or abandonment. 8. Ownership of Materials. All documents, materials, and records of a finished nature, including but not limited to final plans, specifications, video or audio tapes, photographs, computer data, software, reports, maps, electronic files and films, and any final revisions, prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, shall be delivered to and become the property of City. All documents and materials of a preliminary nature, including but not limited to notes, sketches, preliminary plans, computations and other data, and any other material referenced in this Section, prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, shall be made available, upon request, to City at no additional charge and without restriction or limitation on their use. Upon City's request, Consultant shall execute appropriate documents to assign to the City the copyright or trademark to work created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall return all City property in Consultant's control or possession immediately upon termination. 9. Compliance with Laws. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall abide by and conform to any and all applicable laws of the United States and the State of California, and all ordinances, regulations, and policies of the City. Consultant warrants that all work done under this Agreement will be in compliance with all applicable safety rules, laws, statutes, and practices, including but not limited to Cal/OSHA regulations. If a license or registration of any kind is required of Consultant, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and Consultant shall keep it in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and that any applicable bond shall be posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. 10. Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and covenants that Consultant presently has no interest in, nor shall any interest be hereinafter acquired in, any matter which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable state, local, or federal law. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless hereinafter arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that the City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its 2 compliance with the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 81000 et seq.) respecting this Agreement. 11. Whole Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and Agreement of the parties and integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersedes all negotiations or any previous written or oral Agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. The parties intend not to create rights in, or to grant remedies to, any third parry as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein. This Agreement may be amended only by a written document, executed by both Consultant and the City Manager, and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Such document shall expressly state that it is intended by the parties to amend certain terms and conditions of this Agreement. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. Multiple copies of this Agreement may be executed but the parties agree that the Agreement on file in the office of the City Clerk is the version of the Agreement that shall take precedence should any differences exist among counterparts of the document. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 12. Capacity of Parties. Each signatory and party hereto warrants and represents to the other party that it has all legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement and that all necessary actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. 13. Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be declared by a final decision by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid, or beyond the authority of either party to enter into or carry out, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement, absent the unexcised portion, can be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties. 14. Notice. Any notice required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally served or, in lieu of personal service, may be given by (i) depositing such notice in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to a party at its address set forth in Exhibit A; (ii) transmitting such notice by means of Federal Express or similar overnight commercial courier ("Courier"), postage paid and addressed to the other at its street address set forth below; (iii) transmitting the same by facsimile, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon confirmation of receipt by the sending facsimile machine's acknowledgment of such with date and time printout; or (iv) by personal delivery. Any notice given by Courier shall be deemed given on the date shown on the receipt for acceptance or rejection of the notice. Either party may, by written notice, change the address to which notices addressed to it shall thereafter be sent. 15. Miscellaneous. Except to the extent that it provides a part of the definition of the term used herein, the captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered in the construction of interpretation of any provision hereof, nor taken as a correct or complete segregation of the several units of materials and labor. Capitalized terms refer to the definition provide with its first usage in the Agreement. When the context of this Agreement requires, the neuter gender includes the masculine, the feminine, a partnership or corporation, trust or joint venture, and the singular includes the plural. The terms "shall", "will', "must" and "agree" are mandatory. The term "may" is permissive. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. When a party is required to do something by this Agreement, it shall do so at its sole cost and expense without right to reimbursement from the other party unless specific provision is made otherwise. Where any party is obligated not to perform any act, such party is also obligated to restrain any others within its control from performing such act, including its agents, invitees, contractors, subcontractors and employees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant and City execute this Agreement. CITY OF BURLINGAME CONSULTANT 501 Primrose Road Name Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. Burlingame, CA 94010 Address 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95834 iM Lisa Goldman City Manager Date: Attest: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk 4 By: Name Isam Hasenin Title Chief Operating Officer Date: 6/22/2016 Federal Employer ID Number: 06-1689244 License Number:C288871 Expiration Date: N/A Approved as to form: Kathleen Kane City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A Scope of Work Exhibit B Fee Schedule Exhibit C City Insurance Provisions Building Safety and Inspection Services Exhibit A — Scope of Work Exhibit A - Scope of Work Plan Review Services Plan Review. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. will perform plan reviews to check plans for compliance with the California Building Codes as generally found in Title 24 Parts 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 including structural, fire/life safety, disabled access, and energy conservation requirements - as amended by City. Comment Lists and Plans Delivery: Plan reviews result in typed lists of comments, which refer to specific details and drawings, and reference applicable code sections. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. will transport plans comments to City contact person, via FAX, and/or reliable overland carrier. Overnight delivery is available at no extra cost. Depending on the City's preferred process, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. will provide plan check comments and perform rechecks directly with (1) the City, or (2) the applicant/designer, returning approved documents to the City after the plan review process is completed. Turn -Around Schedules: Plan reviews will generally be completed/returned to City within approximately ten (10) working days of the date the plans are received by Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.. Other turnaround schedules will be accommodated at request of City. Large, unusually complex plan reviews may require up to a fifteen (15) day turnaround. Technical Support: When mutually agreed between the City and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. as vital to project success, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. staff will attend pre -construction or pre -design meetings, field visits upon request, and provide support for field inspection personnel on an as -needed basis. Inspection Services Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. will provide building inspector(s) as requested by the City. The scope of inspection services to be provided will be defined below or as defined uniquely for each project or as determined by Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. and the City. Inspector(s) will report directly to the City Building Official or other person designated by the City for all project -related work. In general, the inspection services to be provided may include, but are not limited to, field observation of all construction activity, preparation of daily reports, review of submittals and other duties as assigned. Permit Issuance Services Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. believes strongly in providing the highest possible customer service to each of our clients and to the general public we serve. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. personnel are skilled and trained in assisting permit applicants in all facets of building department policies and procedures. Our staff will calculate and collect permit and inspection fees and issue permits on City forms. All permits will be issued in compliance with the City's adopted Building Codes in the time frame required by the City. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. staff will be available to assist permit applications on all appropriate codes and regulations including flood zone requirements, hazardous materials disclosure reporting, contractor's licensing verification, worker's compensation insurance verification, etc. as needed by the City. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. staff will become familiar with the City's permit tracking software and any recordkeeping necessary for the permit process. Move Forward with Confidence Building Safety and Inspection Services Exhibit B — Fee Schedule Exhibit B — Fee Schedule Plan Review Basic Fees: For complete plan review projects performed at Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. offices, fees are as shown below, based on the City -collected plan review fees. Basic fees include first and second plan reviews and simple, quick third reviews. Full Plan Review Completed in BVNA Offices 75% of City's plan review fee Miscellaneous and Structural Only Review 50% of City's plan review fee Completed in BVNA Offices* Full Plan Review for projects valued over 50% of City's plan review fee $10,000,000 *Plumbing/mechanical/electrical-only and unreinforced masonry The fee for expedited plan review will be an additional 25%. Other Fees: In addition to the Basic Fees described above, time -and materials methods using the current Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. hourly rate schedule will be used for determining fees for the following types of services: 1. Fees for plan review revisions to permitted plans will be based on the current Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. hourly rate schedule. 2. Fees for problem plan checks that require more than a quick third check to approve the project, when mutually agreed between the Chief Building Official and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., will be based on the current Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. hourly rate schedule. 3. For rechecks of projects that were reviewed by others. Inspection Services Building Inspection Services will be provided at $90.00 per hour per inspector, including miscellaneous charges as specified by the current Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. Schedule of Charges (below) or other fixed fee method as mutually agreeable between the City and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.. Permit Issuance Services Permit Issuance Services will be provided at $65.00 per hour in accordance with the current Fee Schedule. i Ab BUREAU VERITAS Move Forward with Confidence Building Safety and Inspection Services Exhibit B — Fee Schedule Exhibit B - Fee Schedule Our pricing reflects our commitment to the success of your City by helping you maintain significant quality and cost saving benefits moving forward. These include: ■ Reduced plan review turnaround times ■ Implementation of established electronic plan review processes ■ Commitment to maintain a proposed rate structure for the life of the initial contract period ■ Highly qualified staff compensated commensurate with their duties and responsibilities ■ Confidence of working with a well-established consultant in business for 180+ years Hourly rates for project personnel are outlined below: Staff Level Classifications Hourly Billing Rate* Senior Plans Examiner $135.00 Senior Engineer $145.00 Plan Review Engineer $115.00 Senior Combination Building Inspector $95.00 Building Inspector $90.00 Permit Technician $65.00 Accessibility Plans Examiner (CASp) $115.00 *Overtime, weekend or holiday rates will be an additional 30% of the hourly rates shown above *Rates are valid from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. Miscellaneous Charges Description Billing Rate* Personal Vehicle, per mile $.55 or current IRS rate Move Forward with Confidence CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 06/16/2016 I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. CONTACT NAME: PHONE 866-283-7122 FAX 800-363-0105 (A/C. No. Ext): AIC. No.: E-MAIL ADDRESS: NY NY Office 199 water Street INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # New York NY 10038-3551 USA INSURED INSURER A: Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 19682 INSURER B: Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company 30104 Bureau VerltaS North America. Inc. 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150 Sacramento CA 95834 USA INSURER C: Twin City Fire Insurance Company 29459 INSURERD: Trumbull Insurance Company 27120 INSURER E: Hartford Casualty Insurance co 29424 INSURERF: Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd 11000 COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 570062558795 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Limits shown are as requested INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE NSD WVD POLICY NUMBER MMIDDNYYY MM DDNYVY LIMITS K X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CGL EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADEX❑ OCCURDAMAGE TO RENTED $1,000,000 PREMISES Ea occurrence MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000 PERSONAL& ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 POLICY X❑ PE a LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $2,000,000 Deductible $10,000 OTHER: A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 10 AB 541202 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $1,000,000 Ea accident AOS BODILY INJURY( Per person) B X ANYAUTO 10 AB 541203 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 BODILY INJURY (Per accident) OWNED SCHEDULED HI AUTOS ONLY AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE HIREDAUTOS NON -OWNED Per accident ONLY AUTOS ONLY Comprehensive Deduct $1,000 ELLA UAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE SS LIAB L CLAIMS -MADE RETENTION D WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 10WN541200 O1 01/2016 —31-767 2017 X I PER STATUTE OTRH- EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN AOS E. L. EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 U ANYPROPRIETOR PARTNER I EXECUTIVE NIA IOWNS41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 /MEMBER OFFICER/MEM CER (Mandatory in NH) AK , ID, IL, NJ , NY E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 K Archit&Eng Prof PPL200631301/01/2016 01/01/2017 Each Claim $1,000,000 SIR applies per policy ter s & conditions Aggregate $1,000,000 SIR $250,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) The city, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are included as Additional Insured in accordance with the policy provisions of the General Liability and Auto Liability policy. General Liability and Auto Liability evidenced herein is Primary and Non -Contributory to other insurance available to an Additional Insured, but only in accordance with the policy's provisions. A waiver of Subrogation is granted in favor of Certificate Holder in accordance with the policy provisions of the General Liability, workers Compensation and Auto Liability policy. The Architects & Engineers policy includes coverage for Professional Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability. `m c m N 2 O x rn cc cc WD 0 0 u) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION i. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City of Burlingame AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010 USA �XKo�s i�Zral/c eJs>Gcac+erDc.//aLtf�s'd��JsaeL ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 570000048582 LOC #: "4 ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY Aon Risk services Northeast, Inc. NAMEDINSURED Bureau veritas North America, Inc. POLICY NUMBER See Certificate Number: 570062558795 CARRIER see Certificate Number: 570062558795 NAIC CODE EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance l INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER G: Property & Casualty Ins Co of Hartford 34690 INSURER H: Hartford Insurance Co Of The Southeast 38261 INSURER I: Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 22357 INSURER ]: Hartford Ins Co of the Midwest 37478 ADDITIONAL POLICIES If a policy below does not include limit information, refer to the corresponding policy on the ACORD certificate form for policy limits. ACORD 101 (2008/01) © 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD POLICY POLICY INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY NUNIBER EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD W VD DATE DATE (NINI/DD/YVYY) (VINI/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY A 10 AB 541202 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 collision $1,000 AOS Deductible WORKERS COMPENSATION B N/A 1OWNS41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 HI, MA I N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 AZ CA GA KY MI MN MT NE I F N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 IA E N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 NC A N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 FL,ND,OH,WA H N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 PA G N/A 10WNs41200 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 DE, LA, VT C N/A 10WBRs41201 01/01/2016 01/01/2017 WI ACORD 101 (2008/01) © 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 570000048582 LOC #: "A ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. NAMED INSURED Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. POLICY NUMBER See Certificate Number: 570062558795 CARRIER See Certificate Number: 570062558795 I NAIC CODE EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER K: Allianz Global Risks US insurance Co. 35300 INSURER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (DINI/DD/1'YYY) INSURER LIMITS INSURER ADDITIONAL POLICIES If a policy below does not include limit information, refer to the corresponding policy on the ACORD certificate form for policy limits. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR wVD POLICYNUNIBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (DINI/DD/1'YYY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MNI/DD/YYYY) LIMITS ACORD 101 (2008/01) © 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD POLICY NUMBER: CGL 2006324 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 01 04 13 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. a w i s t, 5 . . • •• Melillo: 0 1 0 This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART The following is added to the Other Insurance Condition and supersedes any provision to the contrary: Primary And Noncontributory Insurance This insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured under your policy provided that: (1) The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and (2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that this insurance would be primary and would not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured. CG 20 0104 13 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: CGL 2006324 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 24 04 05 09 WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Person Or Organization: Any person or organization with whom you have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement to waive your right of recovery. I Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of Section IV — Conditions: We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the "products - completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the Schedule above. CG 24 04 05 09 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008 Page 1 of 1 0 POLICY NUMBER: 10 AB 541202 COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE HA 99 16 0312 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE BROAD FORM ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM To the extent that the provisions of this endorsement provide broader benefits to the "insured" than other provisions of the Coverage Form, the provisions of this endorsement apply. 1. BROAD FORM INSURED A. Subsidiaries and Newly Acquired or Formed Organizations The Named Insured shown in the Declarations is amended to include: (1) Any legal business entity other than a partnership or joint venture, formed as a subsidiary in which you have an ownership interest of more than 50% on the effective date of the Coverage Form. However, the Named Insured does not include any subsidiary that is an "insured" under any other automobile policy or would be an "insured" under such a policy but for its termination or the exhaustion of its Limit of Insurance. (2) Any organization that is acquired or formed by you and over which you maintain majority ownership. However, the Named Insured does not include any newly formed or acquired organization: (a) That is a partnership or joint venture, (b) That is an "insured" under any other policy, (c) That has exhausted its Limit of Insurance under any other policy, or (d) 180 days or more after its acquisition or formation by you, unless you have given us notice of the acquisition or formation. Coverage does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" that results from an "accident" that occurred before you formed or acquired the organization. B. Employees as Insureds Paragraph A.1. - WHO IS AN INSURED - of SECTION II - LIABILITY COVERAGE is amended to add: d. Any "employee" of yours while using a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow in your business or your personal affairs. C. Lessors as Insureds Paragraph A.1. - WHO IS AN INSURED - of Section If - Liability Coverage is amended to add: e. The lessor of a covered "auto" while the "auto" is leased to you under a written agreement if: (1) The agreement requires you to provide direct primary insurance for the lessor and (2) The "auto" is leased without a driver. Such a leased "auto" will be considered a covered "auto" you own and not a covered "auto" you hire. D. Additional Insured if Required by Contract (1) Paragraph A.1. -WHO IS AN INSURED - of Section II - Liability Coverage is amended to add: f. When you have agreed, in a written contract or written agreement, that a person or organization be added as an additional insured on your business auto policy, such person or organization is an "insured", but only to the extent such person or organization is liable for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused by the conduct of an "insured" under paragraphs a, or b. of Who Is An Insured with regard to the ownership, maintenance or use of a covered "auto." © 2011, The Hartford (Includes copyrighted material Form HA 99 16 0312 of ISO Properties, Inc., with its permission.) Page 1 of 5 The insurance afforded to any such E. Primary and Non-Contributory if additional insured applies only if the Required by Contract "bodily injury" or "property damage" Only with respect to insurance provided to occurs: an additional insured in 1.0. - Additional (1) During the policy period, and Insured If Required by Contract, the (2) Subsequent to the execution of such following provisions apply: written contract, and (3) Primary Insurance When Required By (3) Prior to the expiration of the period Contract of time that the written contract This insurance is primary if you have requires such insurance be provided agreed in a written contract or written to the additional insured. agreement that this insurance be (2) How Limits Apply primary. If other insurance is also If you have agreed in a written contract primary, we will share with all that other or written agreement that another insurance by the method described in person or organization be added as an Other Insurance 5.d. additional insured on your policy, the (4) Primary And Non-Contributory To Other most we will pay on behalf of such Insurance When Required By Contract additional insured is the lesser of: If you have agreed in a written contract (a) The limits of insurance specked in or written agreement that this insurance the written contract or written is primary and non-contributory with the agreement; or additional insured's own insurance, this (b) The Limits of Insurance shown in insurance is primary and we will not the Declarations. seek contribution from that other insurance. Such amount shall be a part of and not Paragraphs (3) and (4) do not apply to other in addition to Limits of Insurance shown insurance to which the additional insured in the Declarations and described in this has been added as an additional insured. Section. (3) Additional Insureds Other Insurance When this insurance is excess, we will have no duty to defend the insured against any "suit" if If we cover a claim or "suit" under this any other insurer has a duty to defend the Coverage Part that may also be covered insured against that "suit". If no other insurer by other insurance available to an defends, we will undertake to do so, but we will additional insured, such additional be entitled to the insured's rights against all insured must submit such claim or "suit" those other insurers. to the other insurer for defense and indemnity. When this insurance is excess over other insurance, we will pay only our share of the However, this provision does not apply amount of the loss, if any, that exceeds the sum to the extent that you have agreed in a of written contract or written agreement (1) The total amount that all such other that this insurance is primary and non- insurance would pay for the loss in the contributory with the additional insured's absence of this insurance; and own insurance. (4) Duties in The Event Of Accident, Claim, (2) The total of all deductible and self-insured Suit or Loss amounts under all that other insurance. you have agreed in a written contract We will share the remaining loss, if any, by the o o r written agreement that another method described in Other Insurance 5.d. person or organization be added as an 2. AUTOS RENTED BY EMPLOYEES additional insured on your policy, the Any "auto" hired or rented by your "employee" additional insured shall be required to an your behalf and at your direction will be comply with the provisions in LOSS considered an "auto" you hire. CONDITIONS 2. - DUTIES IN THE The OTHER INSURANCE Condition is amended EVENT OF ACCIDENT, CLAIM , SUIT by adding the following: OR LOSS — OF SECTION IV — BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS, in the same manner as the Named Insured. © 2011, The Hartford (includes copyrighted material Form HA 99 16 0312 of ISO Properties, Inc., with its permission.) Page 2 of 5 If an "employee's" personal insurance also 5 applies on an excess basis to a covered "auto" hired or rented by your "employee" on your behalf and at your direction, this insurance will be primary to the "employee's" personal insurance. 3. AMENDED FELLOW EMPLOYEE EXCLUSION EXCLUSION 5. - FELLOW EMPLOYEE - of SECTION II - LIABILITY COVERAGE does not apply if you have workers' compensation insurance in -force covering all of your "employees". Coverage is excess over any other collectible insurance. 4. HIRED AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE If hired "autos" are covered "autos" for Liability Coverage and if Comprehensive, Specified Causes of Loss, or Collision coverages are provided under this Coverage Form for any "auto" you own, then the Physical Damage Coverages provided are extended to "autos" you hire or borrow, subject to the following limit. The most we will pay for "loss" to any hired "auto" is: (1) $100,000; (2) The actual cash value of the damaged or stolen property at the time of the "loss"; or (3) The cost of repairing or replacing the damaged or stolen property, whichever is smallest, minus a deductible. The deductible will be equal to the largest deductible applicable to any owned "auto" for that coverage. No deductible applies to "loss" caused by fire or lightning. Hired Auto Physical Damage coverage is excess over any other collectible insurance. Subject to the above limit, deductible and excess provisions, we will provide coverage equal to the broadest coverage applicable to any covered "auto" you own. We will also cover loss of use of the hired "auto" if it results from an "accident", you are legally liable and the lessor incurs an actual financial loss, subject to a maximum of $1000 per "accident". This extension of coverage does not apply to any "auto" you hire or borrow from any of your "employees", partners (if you are a partnership), members (if you are a limited liability company), or members of their households. PHYSICAL DAMAGE - ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE COVERAGE Paragraph A.4.a_ of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE is amended to provide a limit of $507 per day and a maximum limit of $1,000. 6. LOAN/LEASE GAP COVERAGE Under SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, in the event of a total "loss" to a covered "auto", we will pay your additional legal obligation for any difference between the actual cash value of the "auto" at the time of the "loss" and the "outstanding balance" of the loan/lease. "Outstanding balance" means the amount you owe on the loan/lease at the time of "loss" less any amounts representing taxes; overdue payments; penalties, interest or charges resulting from overdue payments; additional mileage charges; excess wear and tear charges; lease termination fees; security deposits not returned by the lessor; costs for extended warranties, credit life Insurance, health, accident or disability insurance purchased with the loan or lease; and carry-over balances from previous loans or leases. 7. AIRBAG COVERAGE Under Paragraph B. EXCLUSIONS - of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, the following is added: The exclusion relating to mechanical breakdown does not apply to the accidental discharge of an airbag. 8. ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT - BROADENED COVERAGE a. The exceptions to Paragraphs B.4 - EXCLUSIONS - of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE are replaced by the following: Exclusions 4.c. and 4.d. do not apply to equipment designed to be operated solely by use of the power from the "auto's" electrical system that, at the time of "loss", is: (1) Permanently installed in or upon the covered "auto'; (2) Removable from a housing unit which is permanently installed in or upon the covered "auto'; (3) An integral part of the same unit housing any electronic equipment described in Paragraphs (1) and (2) above; or ©2011, The Hartford (Includes copyrighted material Form HA 99 16 0312 of ISO Properties, Inc., with its permission.) Page 3 of 5 (4) Necessary for the normal operation of the covered "auto" or the monitoring of the covered "auto's" operating system. b.Section III — Version CA 00 01 03 10 of the Business Auto Coverage Form, Physical Damage Coverage, Limit of Insurance, Paragraph C.2 and Version CA 00 01 10 01 of the Business Auto Coverage Form, Physical Damage Coverage, Limit of Insurance, Paragraph C are each amended to add the following: $1,500 is the most we will pay for "loss" in any one "accident" to all electronic equipment (other than equipment designed solely for the reproduction of sound, and accessories used with such equipment) that reproduces, receives or transmits audio, visual or data signals which, at the time of "loss", is: (1) Permanently installed in or upon the covered "auto" in a housing, opening or other location that is not normally used by the "auto" manufacturer for the installation of such equipment; (2) Removable from a permanently installed housing unit as described in Paragraph 2.a. above or is an integral part of that equipment; or (3) An integral part of such equipment. c. For each covered "auto", should loss be limited to electronic equipment only, our obligation to pay for, repair, return or replace damaged or stolen electronic equipment will be reduced by the applicable deductible shown in the Declarations, or $250, whichever deductible is less. 9. EXTRA EXPENSE - BROADENED COVERAGE Under Paragraph A. - COVERAGE - of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, we will pay for the expense of returning a stolen covered "auto" to you. 10. GLASS REPAIR -WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE Under Paragraph D. - DEDUCTIBLE - of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, the following is added: No deductible applies to glass damage if the glass is repaired rather than replaced. 11. TWO OR MORE DEDUCTIBLES Under Paragraph D. - DEDUCTIBLE - of SECTION III - PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, the following is added: If another Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. company policy or coverage form that is not an automobile policy or coverage form applies to the same "accident", the following applies: (1) If the deductible under this Business Auto Coverage Form is the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be waived; (2) If the deductible under this Business Auto Coverage Form is not the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be reduced by the amount of the smaller (or smallest) deductible. 12. AMENDED DUTIES IN THE EVENT OF ACCIDENT, CLAIM, SUIT OR LOSS The requirement in LOSS CONDITIONS 2.a. - DUTIES IN THE EVENT OF ACCIDENT,CLAIM, SUIT OR LOSS - of SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS that you must notify us of an "accident" applies only when the "accident" is known to: (1) You, if you are an individual; (2) A partner, if you are a partnership; (3) A member, if you are a limited liability company; or (4) An executive officer or insurance manager, if you are a corporation. 13. UNINTENTIONAL FAILURE TO DISCLOSE HAZARDS If you unintentionally fail to disclose any hazards existing at the inception date of your policy, we will not deny coverage under this Coverage Form because of such failure. 14. HIRED AUTO - COVERAGE TERRITORY Paragraph e. of GENERAL CONDITIONS 7. - POLICY PERIOD, COVERAGE TERRITORY - of SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS is replaced by the following: e. For short-term hired "autos", the coverage territory with respect to Liability Coverage is anywhere in the world provided that if the "insured's" responsibility to pay damages for "bodily injury" or "property damage" is determined in a "suit," the "suit" is brought in the United States of America, the territories and possessions of the United States of America, Puerto Rico or Canada or in a settlement we agree to. 15. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US - of SECTION IV - BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS is amended by adding the following: © 2011, The Hartford (Includes copyrighted material Form HA 99 16 0312 of ISO Properties, Inc., with its permission.) Page 4 of 5 We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization with whom you have a written contract that requires such waiver because of payments we make for damages under this Coverage Form. 16. RESULTANT MENTAL ANGUISH COVERAGE The definition of "bodily injury" in SECTION V - DEFINITIONS is replaced by the following: "Bodily injury" means bodily injury, sickness or disease sustained by any person, including mental anguish or death resulting from any of these. 17. EXTENDED CANCELLATION CONDITION Paragraph 2. of the COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS - CANCELLATION - applies except as follows: If we cancel for any reason other than nonpayment of premium, we will mail or deliver to the first Named Insured written notice of cancellation at least 60 days before the effective date of cancellation. 18. HYBRID, ELECTRIC, OR NATURAL GAS VEHICLE PAYMENT COVERAGE In the event of a total loss to a "non -hybrid" auto for which Comprehensive, Specified Causes of Loss, or Collision coverages are provided under this Coverage Form, then such Physical Damage Coverages are amended as follows: a.lf the auto is replaced with a "hybrid" auto or an auto powered solely by electricity or natural gas, we will pay an additional 10%, to a maximum of $2,500, of the "non -hybrid" auto's actual cash value or replacement cost, whichever is less, b.The auto must be replaced and a copy of a bill of sale or new lease agreement received by us within 60 calendar days of the date of "loss," c. Regardless of the number of autos deemed a total loss, the most we will pay under this Hybrid, Electric, or Natural Gas Vehicle Payment Coverage provision for any one "loss" is $10,000. For the purposes of the coverage provision, a.A "non -hybrid" auto is defined as an auto that uses only an internal combustion engine to move the auto but does not include autos powered solely by electricity or natural gas. b.A "hybrid" auto is defined as an auto with an internal combustion engine and one or more electric motors; and that uses the internal combustion engine and one or more electric motors to move the auto, or the internal combustion engine to charge one or more electric motors, which move the auto. 19. VEHICLE WRAP COVERAGE In the event of a total loss to an "auto" for which Comprehensive, Specified Causes of Loss, or Collision coverages are provided under this Coverage Form, then such Physical Damage Coverages are amended to add the following: In addition to the actual cash value of the "auto", we will pay up to $1,000 for vinyl vehicle wraps which are displayed on the covered "auto" at the time of total loss. Regardless of the number of autos deemed a total loss, the most we will pay under this Vehicle Wrap Coverage provision for any one "loss" is $5,000. For purposes of this coverage provision, signs or other graphics painted or magnetically affixed to the vehicle are not considered vehicle wraps. © 2011, The Hartford (Includes copyrighted material Form HA 9916 0312 of ISO Properties, Inc., with its permission.) Page 6 of 5 Allianz ili Policy Number: CGL 2006324 Effective Date: January 01, 2016 THIS ENDORSMENT CHANGES THE POLICY, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADVICE OF CANCELLATION TO ENTITIES OTHER THAN AN INSURED LIMITED TO EMAIL NOTIFICATION This policy is amended as follows: If we initiate cancellation of this policy for any reason other than non payment of premium, and A. The effective date of cancellation is prior to this policy's expiration date; and B. The "First Named Insured" is under an existing contractual obligation to notify an entity to whom a certificate of insurance has been issued (hereinafter, the Certificate Holder) when this policy is canceled; and C. The "First Named Insured" has provided us, either directly or through the "First Named Insured's" broker of record the email address of the contact of each such Certificate Holder; and D. We received this information after the "First Named Insured" receives notice of cancellation of this policy and prior to the policy's cancellation date in an electronic spreadsheet format that is acceptable to us; We will provide "Advice of Cancellation" via e-mail to such Certificate Holders. Proof of emailing the "Advice of Cancellation", using the information provided by the "First Named Insured", will serve as proof that we have fully satisfied our obligations under this endorsement. The "Advice of Cancellation" shall be emailed to each such Certificate Holder as soon as possible upon receipt of the information from the "First Named Insured", however we are under no contractual obligation to email the "Advice of Cancellation" prior to the policy's cancellation date. This endorsement does not affect, in any way, coverage provided under this policy or the cancellation of this policy of the effective date of such cancellation. Nor shall this endorsement invest any rights to any entity that is not an insured under the terms of this policy. The following Definitions apply to this endorsement: A. "First Named Insured" means the Named Insured shown on the Declarations Page of this policy. B. "Advice of Cancellation" means an email that provides the following information: 1. The Named Insured as shown on the Declarations Page of this policy; 2. The policy number of the policy being cancelled: and 3. The effective date and time of the cancellation. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. AGRL-IL 8002 (11-12) Page 1 of 1 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT Policy Number: 10 WN 541200 Endorsement Number: 56 Effective Date:ol/01/2016 Effective hour is the same as stated on the Information Page of the policy. Named Insured and Address: BUREAU VERITAS HOLDINGS, INC. 1601 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWAY SUITE 400 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33323 We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE Any person or organization from whom you are required by written contract or agreement to obtain this waiver of rights from us. Countersigned by su��j�>" Get�Z�r realez Authorized Representative Form WC 00 03 13 Printed in U.S.A. Process Date: Policy Expiration Date: POLICY NUMBER: CGL 2006324 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 24 04 05 09 WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Person Or Organization: Any person or organization with whom you have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement to waive your right of recovery. I Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of Section IV — Conditions: We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the "products - completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the Schedule above. CG 24 04 05 09 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008 Page 1 of 1 ❑ To: Date: From: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: 8d MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Carol Augustine, Finance Director — (650) 558-7222 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution to Approve the 2019 Tourism Business Improvement District Annual Report and to Give Notice of Intent to Levy Assessments for 2020 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intent approving the 2019 Tourism Business Improvement District Annual Report and establish a public hearing date for the levying of the 2020 annual assessments for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District. BACKGROUND The San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was formed in 2001 and now has 13 participating cities throughout San Mateo County and the City of Palo Alto in Santa Clara County. Pursuant to the authority provided by the California Streets and Highways Code (section 36500 et seq.), the District collects assessments from the member hotel properties in the District and uses those annual assessments to fund its successful and wide-ranging hotel -business promotional activities. At the end of each year, the Advisory Board of the District files with the City an annual report stating the past year's activities and accomplishments. In addition, the Advisory Board also recommends the assessment for the coming year. Attached for the City Council's review and approval is the San Mateo County Tourism District Advisory Board's annual report for 2019 and a listing of officials and members for 2020. The list of proposed assessments for the 2020 calendar year is attached to the resolution of intent. There will be no changes to the methodology in computing the amounts of the assessments for 2020. DISCUSSION The City Council should adopt the Resolution of Intention 1) receiving and approving the 2019 Annual Report, and 2) scheduling a public hearing for Monday, December 2, 2019. At the hearing, the City Council will determine if a majority protest has been made and, if not, will levy the 2020 assessments. Notices to the cities and members of the District will be provided by the City Clerk and the District staff. The assessments requested by the District are consistent with the original authority for assessments enacted in 2001 at the time of District formation as amended. 1 Intent to Levy 2020 Assessments — SMC Tourism Business Improvement District November 4, 2019 FISCAL IMPACT Assessment revenues provide funding for operations and activities of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District. The City's annual fee for the billing and collection activities performed on behalf of the District (other than those activities pertaining to Burlingame hotels) is $9,300. Other than the administrative fee revenue, there is no impact to the City's budget. Exhibits: • Resolution Approving 2019 Annual Report and Noticing Intent to Levy Assessments for 2020 • SMCVCB 2019 Annual Report 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of promoting tourism in the District through promotion of scenic, recreational, cultural, hospitality, and other attractions in the San Mateo County region; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board has filed its 2019 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments for the 2020 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District through the City's agreement with the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau has established a basic foundation to promote tourism in the District; and WHEREAS, the enumerated programs proposed by the District for the coming year should significantly assist the hospitality industry continue its economic recovery throughout the geographical area of the District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code sections 36533 and 36534, the city Council shall receive and approve the District Advisory Board's annual report and shall adopt a Resolution establishing assessments for the coming year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RESOLVES, DETERMINES, AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The 2019 annual report of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board filed with the City Clerk is received and approved. 2. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2020 year on hotels in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance Nos. 1648, 1678, 1774, 1848 and 1851 for the purpose of funding programs and activities of the District. 3. The types of programs and activities proposed to be funded by the levy of assessments on hotels in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference. These programs and activities are without substantial change from those previously established for the District. 4. The method and basis for levying the assessments on all hotels within the District are set forth in Exhibit `B", incorporated herein by reference. The method and basis remain unchanged from the previous year. 5. New hotels shall not be exempt from assessment. 6. A public hearing on the proposed assessments and programs for the year 2020 is hereby set for December 2, 2019 at 7:00 p.m., before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, in the Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. At the public hearing, the City Council will receive testimony and evidence; and interested persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail or delivered to the City Clerk, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. 7. Oral or written protests may be made at the hearing. To count in a majority protest against the proposed assessment for the 2020 year, a protest must be in writing and submitted to the City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on December 2, 2019. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of that public hearing. Each written protest shall identify the hotel and its address. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City of Burlingame as the owner of the hotel, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the hotel. Any written protest as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which objection is made. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the owners of hotels within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments of the entire District, as to the proposed assessments for the 2020 year, no assessment for the 2020 year shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are of record written protests by the owners of hotels within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments of the entire District only as to a program or activity proposed, then that type of improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2020 year. 9. Further information regarding the proposed assessments and procedures for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California, phone 650-558-7203. The annual report of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District is on file and available at the Office of the City Clerk at 501 Primrose, Burlingame, California. 10. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing this Resolution in a newspaper of General circulation in the City of Burlingame in accordance with the requirements of the Government and Streets & Highways Codes and mailing in accordance with those requirements and Ordinance No. 1648 and 1678. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 4th day of November, 2019, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk EXHIBIT A SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY/SILICON VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR 2020 For the calendar year 2020, the Bureau plans to continue all of its normal activities, including but not limited to: * Develop more robust electronic marketing strategy across all platforms to further extend the reach of the Bureau and Partners; * Exhibiting in trade shows; * Conducting individual familiarization (FAM) and site tours for planners; * Conducting FAM tours for international travel agents from overseas; * Conducting FAM tours for members of the food and travel media from around the U.S.; * Conducting individual FAM tours for travel media; * Using multiple social media channels to push out stories on the area; * Conducting ad campaigns with Google to promote both our region and members we serve; * Advertising in meeting planner publications; * Advertising in leisure publications; * Promoting the area to international and domestic media with regular releases ofeditorial; * Creating multiple blogs every month to promote various aspects of the area; * Creating updated visitor guides, electronic maps and specialty brochures, such as our Dog Friendly Guide; * Continue to assist film producers, helping them identify locations, secure permits and hotel accommodations; * Conduct sales outreach to recruit conferences, special events, tour and travel groups to the area; * Assist with the promotion of job fairs for area community college and adult school students to help employers in the hospitality industry find team members; * Continue promoting the "As Fresh as it Gets' farm -to -table program, connecting restaurants with farmers and farmers with consumers at local farmers markets; * Continue to work with BART to make ticket purchases via our website a more streamlined experience, allowing guests to purchase tickets prior to arriving in the area. EXHIBIT B SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT FORMULA CHART CATEGORY ZONE A - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR ZONE B - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR ZONE C - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2020 Hotel with full $360 per sleeping room x 69.5% X (District months $360 per sleeping room X 55% X (District $360 per sleeping room x 68% X (District months service and more in 2020) months in 2020) in 2020) than 20 sleeping 12 12 12 rooms Hotel with limited $180 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months $180 per sleeping room X 40% X (District $180 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months service and 1,000 in 2020) months in 2020) in 2020) square feet or more of 12 12 12 meeting space and more than 20 sleeping Hotel with limited $90 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in $90 per sleeping room X 40% X (District $90 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months service and some 2020) months in 2020) in 2020) meeting space but 12 12 12 less than 1,000 square feet and more than 20 sleeping rooms Hotel with standard $54 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in $54 per sleeping room X 40% X (District $54 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months service and more 2020) months in 2020) in 2020) than 20 sleeping 12 12 12 rooms Hotel with full $54 per sleeping room X 30% X (District months in $54 per sleeping room X 25% X (District $54 per sleeping room X 30% X (District months service, limited 2020) months in 2020) In 2020) service, or standard 12 12 12 service, and 20 sleeping rooms or less ZONE A - Includes all cities in the District except coastal cities and Palo Alto. ZONE B - Includes Half Moon Bay, Pacifica and most additional unincorporated areas. ZONE C - Palo Alto Convention and Visitors Bureau 111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 410, Burlingame, CA 94010 SILICON VALLEY 650-348-7600 • 1-800-288-4748 The be -51 d the Fax 650-348-7687 Scan Francisca Bay Area info@smccvb.com • www.visitsanmateocounty.com San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Annual Report forthe Burlingame City Council as Lead Agency for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District October 15, 2019 Activities/Accomplishments from October 2018 through September 2019 Overall: In the last 12 months, the Bureau generated 455 meeting leads for San Mateo County and Palo Alto properties. We booked a total of 27,955 definite room nights, as well as numerous banquets, with an economic impact of $18,179,715. (International Market figures are only available on calendar year basis - January -December 2018.) This total does NOT include individual corporate or leisure traveler nights generated through advertising and promotion, groups rebooking directly with our hotels, or additional non -room local revenue generated by filming. Accomplishments in Meeting Sales • Escorted numerous individual meeting planners on site visits to generate leads for/close group business. • Participated in over 60 industry trade shows and events. • Held receptions for meeting planners in Dallas, Denver, Washington, DC, Chicago, Austin, Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tucson and New York. • Conducted sales missions with San Francisco Travel in Washington, DC, New York, Arizona, Texas, and Ohio. • Conducted meeting planner Familiarization (FAM) Tour for meeting and event professionals from across the US showcasing San Mateo County and Palo Alto. • Conducted sales "blitzes" in Sacramento and multiple Midwestern cities. • Conducted joint sales calls with hotel partner reps in Sacramento. • Co-sponsored events with partners at CaISAE, MPINCC, MPI Sacramento/Sierra NV and NorCal PCMA. • Continued our hot dates/hot rates notification program, sending last minute deals out to key meeting planners to assist area properties with filling "need" dates. • Conducted numerous targeted meeting planner outreach campaigns to all market segments. • Co-sponsored client events with area satellite CVB reps in Chicago, Washington, DC, and Bay Area. • Continued outreach to third party meeting planners and meeting management companies, including Smith Bucklin, Global Cynergies, Experient, Helms Briscoe, Conference Direct, Hospitality Performance Network, American Express Meetings & Events, Smith Moore & Associates, Association Management Co., Senior Planners Industry Network, American Meetings Network, Alliance of Independent Meeting Professionals, and AMG, as well as to a number of independent third party planners. • Participated as member of the California Society of Association Executives (CaISAE) committees, Meeting Planners International Northern California (MPINCC) and MPI Sacramento/Sierra Nevada committees, International Association of Exhibitions & Events and Association of Meeting Professionals (a MD, DC, VA organization) allowing access to planners. • Continued outreach throughout the U.S., building relationships with association, corporate, third -party and SMERF meeting planners and sports event organizers. • Remained actively involved in local (San Francisco, Sacramento/Sierra Nevada, Chicago/Greater Midwest, and Washington, DC) industry group chapters of Meetings Professional International, Professional Convention Management Association, Society of Government Meeting Planners, California Society of Association Executives, American Society Association Executives, and CaISAE Bay Area region. • Featured in editorial in Smart Meetings and Successful Meetings. • Advertised in publications directed at meeting planners, including: North Star, Meeting Professional Int'I Northern CA Chapter Membership Directory, Successful Meetings, Northern CA Meeting & Events and Cvent. • Created promotional flyers for booked clients to enhance attendance. • Continued to train hotel partners on how to most efficiently respond to booking leads in the new CRM system. Accomplishments in Leisure and International Promotion • Participated in the IPW tradeshow (international inbound travel) in Anaheim, CA, doubling our number of one-on-one meetings with international travel buyers and journalists. • Participated in Euro Sales mission to Amsterdam, France and Italy, with presentations and destination trainings to top tour agencies in these markets. • Attended and conducted one-on-one business appointments at the Go West Summit. • Attended Receptive Tour Operator (RTO) Summit in Orlando, meeting one -on -ane with receptive tour operators who handle Europe, India and South America markets. • Hosted International FAM tours for travel agents, airline representatives, buyers and tour operators from Belgium, Brazil, China, France, India and Italy, and a local tour company building new itineraries for their clients. • Participated in Sales Missions to South Korea and Taiwan, and met with tour operators, meeting incentive travel buyers, Visit California market reps and travel journalists. Conducted presentations and training held at various leading tour companies/agencies and for over 50 top travel buyers invited to The American Institute in Taiwan. • Conducted one-on-one meetings and did presentations and staff training with receptive tour operators, meeting incentive buyers and travel journalists in Los Angeles and Las Vegas on a five-day Sales Mission. Markets included China, Japan, Korea, France and Germany. • Co -hosted a luncheon presenting to over 70 receptive tour operators in China market (Los Angeles). • Co -hosted a luncheon presenting to 40 receptive tour operators in Japan market (Los Angeles ). • Participated in Visit California and British Airways UK/Ireland Super Fam. • Conducted individual hotel site visits for top producing receptive tour operator, the largest global "hotel bank". • Had our area included in major German and Indian tour operator brochures and magazines, with a dedicated section for just our area, listing cities, restaurants, hotels, major attractions, sightseeing highlights and suggested itineraries. • Continued to familiarize international tour companies with our area, successfully adding itineraries in our area to their vacation brochures. • Networked with Visit California's overseas offices in Australia/New Zealand, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Scandinavia, South Korea and the UK on an ongoing basis, providing information for distribution abroad and participating in promotional opportunities. Accomplishments in Marketing Efforts • Website users increased 84.46% (115,722 users), with unique visitor visits up 88.26%. • Website sessions increased 89.48%. • Page views increased 61.57%. • Drove increased web traffic from the United States, India, Japan and South Korea. • Increased prospective visitors' use of our mobile site, with mobile users up by 135.51% and tablet users by 52.54%. e • Placed ads aimed at individual/leisure travelers in the Official California Visitor Guide, VIA, National Geographic Traveler + Hot Spot Travel Email Blasts (April/May and October/November), Food + Travel Magazine and Facebook. • Continued a year-long Google adwords campaign. • Initiated a year-long banner ad campaign with Google (October). • Produced and distributed 70,000 visitor guides with map insert; 5,000 Coastal Visitors' Guides (April 2019), and 10,000 Pet Friendly Guides (September 2019). Our collateral is on display at Stanford University, Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce, Hiller Aviation Museum, California Welcome Center @ PIER 39, SF Travel Welcome Center, and SFO, OAK and S10 airports. • Sent monthly e -bulletins to thousands of prospective visitors in our database, listing special events and special rates to encourage visits. • Continued to market our area as a top culinary destination with the "As Fresh as it Gets' program. Built upon partnerships with San Mateo County Farm Bureau, San Mateo County Agriculture Commission and San Mateo County Harbor District to encourage restaurants, hotels and caterers to buy and serve the freshest local produce, seafood, wine, beer and dairy products. Held "As Fresh as it Gets" awards program and "Farm Day," introducing chefs with local farmers. Handled marketing efforts for the first annual "As Fresh as it Gets" dinner. • Filled thousands of visitor info requests generated by our ads and articles on our area. • Provided links and additional photos and profiles for partners on CVB website. • Continued updating CRM system, website and social media, allowing more exposure for area businesses. • Showcased our area on major marquee in Times Square during January 2019, along with a paid editorial/advertisement in Horizon Travel & Lifestyle magazine. Film Commission Efforts • Successfully recruited indie/short films and commercials, plus advertising, music and video productions. • Recruited TV shows that included Sesame Street, House Hunters International, Silicon Valley (HBO), Gordon Ramsay, and The Bachelor (ABC). • Successfully assisted filming for Netflix shows, including 13 Reasons Why and Summer Camp. • Recruited advertisements, such as Barbie (Mattel). • Assisted with multiple student films and documentaries. • Worked on web and TV commercials that included Apple, Chevy, eBay, Facebook, Gatorade, Google, Honda, Lincoln, Linkedln, Kaiser Permanente, and TriNet. • Recruited and assisted with fashion, still and catalog shoots, such as Audi, ESPN, Genentech, Google and U be rEats. • Targeted professional location scouts and managers, sending out monthly email updates of new and interesting filming locations. • Provided ongoing script breakdowns/shot lists for proposed film projects, matching them with available San Mateo County/Silicon Valley locations and sending appropriate images. • Handled average of 10 requests per week for filming/permitting assistance, providing guidance to producers on how to access venues to film, secure necessary permits and book hotel rooms for crews. • Participated in film industry events such as FLICS (Film Liaisons of California). • Showcased our area in the Location 2019 magazine, The Reel Directory, Locations Worldwide, California Locations Conference magazine, and COLA (California on Locations Awards) magazine, all industry publications distributed to film industry professionals. Recap of Media Outreach • Attended IPW Media Day (international inbound travel), pitching stories to 50 travel writers and journalists. • Conducted multiple individual tours for travel writers from throughout the country. • Attended TravMedia's International Media Marketplace (IMM) 2019 in New York, sponsored by Visit California. 4 • Attended Visit California Outlook Forum. • Customized stories to fit needs of extensive media calendars we have purchased, sending numerous "made to fit" pieces out on a monthly basis. • Followed up on requests from travel writers for information for specific stories. • Worked closely with the Visit California team, responding to all publicity leads that came in to the state. • Continued to build our media database, sending editorial ideas to travel editors. • Continued promotion of the area on daily basis via interactive social media. • Maintained social media channels for the CVB: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Linkedln. • Maintained the San Mateo County/Silicon Valley website, creating new pages and campaigns to increase visits and engagement. • Wrote and published numerous blogs on different aspects of the area, highlighting hotels, restaurants and other partners. • Enhanced and maintained calendar of events. • Created/updated numerous specialty flyers and brochures. • Maintained our CRM and assisted partners with Partner Portal questions. Media Coverage Realized Due to Our Efforts Electronic Only: • "Locally Owned Shops in Downtown Burlingame," Jennifer Prince, travellikeaprince.com, November 12, 2018 https-//www.travellikeai)rince.com/2018ZllZdowntown-burlingame • "Festive Fall in Silicon Valley," by Susan Lanier -Graham, Wander with Wonder, October 18, 2018 https //www wanderwithwonder com/2018/10/18/festive-fall-in-silicon-valley I Travel website/blog receives 87k unique visitors/month. • "Come. Sit. Stay. Convention & Visitors Bureau Expands Puppy Love," https,//`drifttravel com/come-sit-stay- convention-visitors-bu reau-expands-puppy-love • "John K. Abendroth, PGA I Co -Host, Hooked on Golf Radio," https•//golfcontentnetwork.com/interviews/iohn-k- abend roth-pga-former-oaa-tour-plaver-co-host-hooked-on-golf-radio • 'Travel Track on Sirk TV: Half Moon Bay Brewing Co.," https•//sirkty com/2018/11/12/half-moon-bay-brewing-co • 'Travel Track on Sirk T: Mavericks Surf Company/Jeff Clark" - Part 1: https�//sirktv.com/2018/11/12/mavericks-surf- company-oart-i and Part 2: https•//sirkty com/2018/11/12/mavericks-surf-company-part-ii • "A Visit to the Guittard Chocolate Company", by Doreen Pendgracs, Chocolatour, https•//chocolatour net/a-visit-to- the-gu itta rd-chocol ate-com pa nv • "32 Best Off the Beaten Path Spots in North America, January 18, 2019," httos•//somethingoffreedom.com/off-the- beaten path destinations-north-america/#San Mateo County United States of America • "Pacifica on the California Coast: You Can Go Home Again" by Ruth Wertzberger Carlson, March 1, 2019 httos//www wanderwithwonder com/2019/03/O1/pacifica- california/7fbclid=IWAR3PBLDhlDklVlr6iOC1VXR6XJnwOWNp G xSYgrtR8r73Kif9EuOIM5nyg ITravel website/blog receives 87k unique visitors/month. • "Why We Think San Mateo County/Silicon Valley, California is a Hidden Gem", TourOperatorLand https•//mvemail constantcontact com/Hidden-Gems-not-far-off-the-beaten- path html?sold=1011122784621&aid=X2uvbunNeWB • "Q&A with Anne LeClair", by Matt Ward, Golf Content Network, May 28, 2019 https //www golfcontentnetwork com/travel/anne-leclair-president-ceo-san-mateo-county • "What to Do in Silicon Valley: 7 Must -See Attractions", by Amanda Noventa, Amanda Viaja (Brazil), June 2019 http•//www amandaviaia com br/o-aue-fazer-no-vale-do-silicio-7-atracoes-imi)erdiveis I Brazilian blog has a reach of 100k/month with 53.5k Instagram followers and 64.6k likes on Facebook. • 'Things to Do in San Francisco in 3 Days: Basic Itinerary and Alternatives," by Amanda Noventa, Amanda Viaja (Brazil), June 2019. Brazilian blog with reach of 300k/month. http://www.amandavia*a.com.br/o-clue-fazer-em-san- francisco I Blog has a reach of 100k/month with 53.5k Instagram followers and 54.6k likes on Facebook. • "4 California Wine Country Alternatives to Napa Valley," by Mary Charlebois, Captain Jetson, July 23, 2019 https•//captainietson com/featured/4-california-wine-country-alternatives-to-nada-valley • "Residence Inn, Redwood City— My New Forever Home," by Mary Charlebois, The Travel 100, June 3, 2019 https,//thetravellOO.net/residence-inn-redwood-city • "6 Best fall weekend getaways for eco-conscious couples in North America," by Jennifer Prince, Drink Tea & Travel, August 10, 2019 https•//www drinkteatravel com/fall-weekend-getaways-north-americaZ I Reach/Visibility: Website receives an average of 501k monthly visitors and 80k monthly page views. • "Gluten-Free in California's San Mateo County," by Mary Farah, Along Comes Mary, September 11, 2019 http //www alongcomesmarvblog com/gluten-free-californias-san-mateo-county-giveaway-ends-9-24/ I Blog has an average monthly readership of 5-6k with a UVM of 2-2.Sk. Print & Electronic: • "Between San Francisco and Santa Clara, San Mateo County has a lot to offerl" by Lee Hammer, KGO on the Go, Issue 4, Vol 1, 2018-19, pp. 53-55 https://digital.moderniuxury.com/publication/?i=521407#f"issue id":521407 "page":54} (Exhibit D) • "Colma, la ville aux 1800 habitants et 2 million de tombes," by St6phane Cugnier, Ouest France ncc s www ouestfrance fr/leditiondusoir/data/36610/reader/reader html#lpreferred/1/package/36610/pub/5304 2/page/14 I Reach/Visibility: Sunday Edition has a total circulation of over 370k copies. The website is ranked 8"' of the most visited news media sites in France, with 97M visits per month. • "Celebrate Fall in Half Moon Bay, CA," by Matt Villano, VIA, October 2018 https,//www.viamagazine.com/events/half-moon-bay-weekend-escape I Reach/Visibility: Via Magazine has an annual circulation of 3.2M to AAA member households in NorCal, NV, UT, AZ, OR, southern ID, MT, WY and AK. • "California Road Trip," Smart Meetings, January 2019 http //Dubs rovie com/publication/frame Dhl2?i=554179&p=1&pn=&ver-html5 I Has a reach of 90k print readership, 55k email subscribers and 240k followers on social media. • "The Bright Side of Bay Area Economy," The Dailylournal, February 2019 httos //www smdailviournal com/news/local/the-bright-side-of-bay-area-economy/article fa3be712-260-11e9- 82a6-c74b89f8e633.html • "An Unexpected Wine Pairing San Mateo County and the Silicon Valley's Wine Country," Hill City Bride Magazine, March 17, 2019. https•//issuu com/theclutchguide/docs/hill city bride - volume i 2019/38 I Prints 6k copies twice a year with a social reach of 34k. (Exhibit D) • "Sustentabilidad al Plato" by Mariana Vega, Food & Travel (Mexico) Magazine, April 2019 1 Reach/Visibility: Food & Travel Magazine (Mexico) has a print run of 35k copies and 150k monthly readers. Their website has a monthly average of 575k page views and 278k unique visitors. (Exhibit D) • 'The Bay of Pleasures" by Denis Goran, Golf Magazine France, May 2019. Reach/Visibility: Monthly magazine with a circulation of 30k copies per month and a monthly audience of 190k. (Exhibit D) • "Taste California: The Best of the San Francisco Bay Area," Travel: Food & Travel Magazine, Spring 2019 https,//issuu.comLfoodandtravelmagazine.us/docs/spring 2019 digital zinio2/54 I Reach/Visibility: The magazine has a reach of over 600k readers and is available in 25 countries. (Exhibit D) • "California Beach Towns," by LaRene Grisom, Westways Magazine, July 17, 2019 httos //www calif aaa com/publications/travel/us-destinations/california/beach-towns.html?zio=-aaa Reach/Visibility: Westways Magazine has an annual circulation of 4.2M and an audience of 12M throughout Southern California. • "From Facebook to Google and Apple to Intel, a Selfie Tour of Silicon Valley's Tech Giants,", by Peter Neville -Hadley, South Morning China Post, September 4, 2019, https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post- magazine/travel/article/3025517/facebook-google-and-apple-intel-selfie-tour-silicon I Reach/Visibility: The SMCP has a print circulation of 105,347k (Monday -Saturday) and 82,117k (Sunday) and a readership of 330,000k. Their website has an average of 21M active users/month and 87M page views/month. Community Participation • Hosted four hospitality industry job fairs: Canada College, College of San Mateo, San Mateo Adult School and Skyline College. • CEO participation in Leadership Palo Alto and Leadership San Mateo. • CEO participation in the Skyline College President's Council's Success Summit. • Provided marketing assistance with Ohlone-Portola Heritage Day. • Participation in Pie Ranch's annual fundraiser supporting local farmers and Elizabeth F. Gamble Garden's Joyful Living Event. Additional Outreach • Continued to work closely with the team at SFO, welcoming new airlines to our area. • Attended new airline/new flight service ceremonies at SFO, creating strong visibility for San Mateo County and Palo Alto with new carriers. • Assisted with promotion of the Peninsula Sports Hall of Fame induction ceremony. • Gave numerous speeches and presentations in Bay Area in effort to get local assistance with meeting recruitment. • Continued to build relationships with the Cow Palace, San Mateo County Event Center, South San Francisco Conference Center, and Seaport Conference Center, working to bring leads to their sales teams and assist in closing business. • Worked with SFO, BART and Caltrain to promote our area as easily accessible. • Continued outreach to chambers and cities in our counties we serve in order to include key area events in our events calendars and to maximize our searches for filming venues. EXHIBIT A SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SAN MATEO COUNTY/SILICON VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU PLANNED ACTIVITIES FOR 2020 For the calendar year 2020, the Bureau plans to continue all of its normal activities, including but not limited to: * Develop more robust electronic marketing strategy across all platforms to further extend the reach of the Bureau and Partners; * Exhibiting in trade shows; * Conducting individual familiarization (FAM) and site tours for planners; * Conducting FAM tours for international travel agents from overseas; * Conducting FAM tours for members of the food and travel media from around the U.S.; * Conducting individual FAM tours for travel media; * Using multiple social media channels to push out stories on the area; * Conducting ad campaigns with Google to promote both our region and members we serve; * Advertising in meeting planner publications; * Advertising in leisure publications; * Promoting the area to international and domestic media with regular releases of editorial; * Creating multiple blogs every month to promote various aspects of the area; * Creating updated visitor guides, electronic maps and specialty brochures, such as our Dog Friendly Guide; * Continue to assist film producers, helping them identify locations, secure permits and hotel accommodations; * Conduct sales outreach to recruit conferences, special events, tour and travel groups to the area; * Assist with the promotion of job fairs for area community college and adult school students to help employers in the hospitality industry find team members; * Continue promoting the "As Fresh as it Gets" farm -to -table program, connecting restaurants with farmers and farmers with consumers at local farmers markets; * Continue to work with BART to make ticket purchases via our website a more streamlined experience, allowing guests to purchase tickets prior to arriving in the area. SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT FORMULA CHART ZONE A - Includes all cities in the District except coastal cities and Palo Alto. ZONE B - Includes Half Moon Bay, Pacifica and most additional unincorporated areas. ZONE C - Palo Alto M X X W W ZONE A - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2020 ZONE B - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2020 ZONE C - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2020 CATEGORY Hotel with full service $360 per sleeping room x 69.5% X (District months in 2020) $360 per sleeping room X 55% X (District months in 2020) $360 per sleeping room x 68% X in 2020) (District 12 more and than 20 sleeping 12onths 12 rooms $180 sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) $180 per sleeping room X 40% X (District months in 2020) $180 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) Hotel with limited service per 12 12 and 1,000 square feet or more 12 of meeting space and more than 20 sleeping rooms Hotel with limited service $90 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) $90 per sleeping room X 40% X (District months in 2020) $90 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) 12 and some meeting space 12 12 but less than 1,000 square feet and more than 20 sleeping rooms Hotel with standard service $54 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) $54 per sleeping room X 40% X (District months in 2020) $54 per sleeping room X 60% X (District months in 2020) 12 and more than 20 sleeping 12 12 rooms Hotel with full service, $54 per sleeping room X 30% X (District months in 2020) $54 per sleeping room X 25% X (District months in 2020) $54 per sleeping room X 30% X (District 12nths in 2020) limited service, or standard 12 12 service, and 20 sleeping rooms or less ZONE A - Includes all cities in the District except coastal cities and Palo Alto. ZONE B - Includes Half Moon Bay, Pacifica and most additional unincorporated areas. ZONE C - Palo Alto M X X W W 1 of 6 *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Burlingame Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment - Bay Landing A $ 90.00 130 $ 7,020.00 $ 585.00 Crowne Plaza SFO A $ 360.00 309 $ 77,311.80 $ 6,442.65 DoubleTree by Hilton SFO A $ 360.00 395 $ 98,829.00 $ 8,235.75 Embassy Suites SFO -Waterfront A $ 360.00 340 $ 85,068.00 $ 7,089.00 Hampton Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 77 $ 2,494.80 $ 207.90 Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 132 $ 14,256.00 $ 1,188.00 Hilton SF Airport Bayfront A $ 360.00 400 $ - 100,080.00 $ 8,340.00 Holiday Inn Express SFO South A $ 90.00 146 $ - - 7,884.00 $ 657.00 Hyatt Regency SFO A $ 360.00 789 $ 197,407.80 $ 16,450.65 Red Roof Plus+ A $ 54.00 213 $ 6,901.20 $ 575.10 SFO Marriott Waterfront A $ 360.00 688 $ 172,137.60 $ 14,344.80 Vagabond Inn Executive - A $ 54.00 90 $ 2,916.00 $ 243.00 Room Total 3709 - - - - Total: $ 772,306.20 0 %M\",_ 3F 40 Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment San Mateo Americas Best Value Inn A $ 54.00 53 $ 1,717.20 $ 143.10 Best Western Coyote Point A $ 54.00 99 $ 3,207.60 $ 267.30 The Catrina Hotel A $ 54.00 57 $ 1,846.80 $ 153.90 Extended Stay America A $ 54.00 136 $ 4,406.40 $ 367.20 Hillsdale Inn A $ 54.00 90 $ 2,916.00 $ 243.00 Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 156 $ 16,848.00 $ 1,404.00 Holiday Inn & Suites A $ 360.00 110.$ 27,522.00 $ 2,293.50 - Residence Inn - A $ 54.00 160 $ 5,184.00 $ 432.00 San Mateo Marriott A $ 360.00 476 $ 119,095.20 $ 9,924.60 San Mateo SFO Airport Hotel A $ 54.00 110 $ 3,564.00 $ 297.00 - Stone Villa Inn A $ 90.00 45 $ 2,430.00 $ 202.50 - - - - - Room Total 1492 Total: $ 188,737.20 South San Francisco Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment AC Hotel SFO/Oyster Point Waterfront A $ 360.00 187 $ 46,787.40 $ 3,898.95 Airport Inn A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80 All Seasons Lodge A $ 54.00 13 $ 210.60 $ 17.55 Americana Inn Motel A $ _ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95 - Americas Best Value Inn SFO A $ 54.00 21 $ 680.40 $ 56.70 - Best Western Plus Grosvenor Hotel A $ 360.00 206 $ 51,541.20 $ 4,295.10 Comfort Inn & Suites SFO A $ 54.00 166 $ 5,378.40 $ - 448.20 Courtyard Oyster Point A $ 180.00 197 $ 21,276.00 $ 1,773.00 Days Inn A $ 54.00 25 $ 810.00 $ 67.50 2 of 6 *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Deluxe Inn A $ 54.00 20-$ 324.00 $ - 27.00 Embassy Suites SFO A $ 360.00 312 $ 78,062.40 $ 6,505.20 Four Points by Sheraton A $ - 54.00 101 $ 3,272.40 272.70 Hampton Inn A $ 54.00 100 $__ - - 3,240.00 $ 270.00 Hilton Garden Inn SFO North A $ 180.00 169 $ 18,252.00 $ 1,521.00 Holiday Inn Express & Suites A $ - 54.00 87 $ 2,818.80 $ - - 234.90 Holiday Inn SF Int'I Airport A $ 360.00 224 $ 56,044.80 $ 4,670.40 Home2 Suites by Hilton SFO North A $ - 180.00 155 $ 16,740.00 $ - 1,395.00 Hotel Focus SFO A - $ 54.00 117 $ 3,790.80 $ - 315.90 Hotel Nova SFO by Fairbridge A $ - - 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50 - Hotel V A $ 54.00 51 $ 1,652.40 $ 137.70 La Quinta Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 171 $ 5,540.40 $ 461.70 Larkspur Landing A $ 90.00 111 $ 5,994.00 $ 499.50 Park Pointe Hotel A $ 180.00 175 $ 18,900.00 $ 1,575.00 Ramada Limited Suites A $ 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50 Residence Inn Oyster Point A $ 90.00 152 $ 8,208.00 $ - 684.00 - - -- Royal Inn A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ - - 22.95 - Travelers Inn A $ 54.00 20 $ 324.00 $ - 27.00 Travelodge SFO North A $ 54.00 199 $ 6,447.60 $ 537.30 - Room Total 3137 ---- Total: 360,864.00 Millbrae Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Aloft SFO A $ 90.00 271 $ 14,634.00 $ 1,219.50 The Dylan Hotel at SFO A $ 54.00 58 $ 1,879.20 $ 156.60 El Rancho Inn, Best Western Signature Collectior A $ 54.00 219 $ 7,095.60 $ 591.30 - La Quinta Inn & Suites SFO A $ 54.00 100 $ 3,240.00 $ 270.00 Marriott Fairfield Inn & Suites SFO A $ 54.00 80 $ 2,592.00 $ 216.00 Millwood Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80 The Westin S.F. Airport A $ 360.00 397 $ 99,329.40 $ 8,277.45 - Room Total 1159 - Total: $ 129,871.80 Foster City Name of Property Zone 'Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Crowne Plaza Foster City -San Mateo A $ 360.00 356 89,071.20 $ - 7,422.60 Courtyard San Mateo -Foster City A $ - 180.00 147 1,323.00 TownePlace Suites San Mateo -Foster City A $ 54.00 121 $ 3,920.40 $ - 326.70 - - Room Total 624 Total: $ 108,867.60 3of6 Half Moon Bay Unincorporated County *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Beach House Hotel B $ 180.00 54 $ 3,888.00 $ 324.00 Best Western Plus Cameron's Inn B $ 90.00 46 $ 1,656.00 $ 138.00 Coastside Inn B $ 54.00 52 $ 1,123.20 $ 93.60 Half Moon Bay Inn B $ 54.00 15-$ $ 202.50 B 16.88 Half Moon Bay Lodge B $ 180.00 81 $ 5,832.00 81.00 486.00 Mill Rose Inn B $ 54.00 6 $ 81.00 54.00 6.75 The Miramar Inn & Suites B $ 54.00 27 $ 583.20 108.00 48.60 Nantucket Whale Inn B 95 54.00 7 $ 94.50 54.00 7.88 Quality Inn B $ 90.00 54 $ 1,944.00 54.00 162.00 The Ritz-Carlton B 10 360.00 2611 $ 51,678.00 m Total 4,306.50 San Benito House B $ 54.00 12 $ 162.00 $ 13.50 Zaballa House Bed & Breakfast B 54.00 16 $ 216.00 $ 18.00 Name of Property Zone Category/Ass Atherton Inn B $ Best Western Plus Executive Suites B $ Canyon Ranch Wellness Retreat B $ Costanoa B $ Cypress Inn on Miramar Beach B $ Grand Hyatt at SFO A $ Harbor View Inn B $ Inn at Mavericks B $ Inn Suites at Oceano B $ Ocean View Inn B $ The Oceanfront Hotel B $ Oceano Hotel & Spa B $ Pacific Victorian Bed & Breakfast B $ Pescadero Creek Inn B $ Seal Cove Inn B $ nent # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment 54.00 5 $ 67.50 $ 5.63 54.00 29 $ 626.40 $ 52.20 360.00 38 $ 7,524.00 $ 627.00 90.00 172 $ 6,192.00 $ 516.00 54.00 18 $ 243.00 $ 20.25 360.00 351 $ 87,820.20 $ 7,318.35 54.00 17 $ 229.50 $ 19.13 54.00 6 $ 81.00 $ 6.75 54.00 11 $ 148.50 $ 12.38 54.00 9 $ 121.50 $ 10.13 54.00 8 $ 108.00 $ 9.00 360.00 95 $ 18,810.00 $ 1,567.50 54.00 3 $ 40.50 $ 3.38 54.00 4 $ 54.00 $ 4.50 54.00 10 $ 135.00 $ 11.25 m Total 776 Total: $ 122,201.10 4 of 6 *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Redwood City Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Atherton Park Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60 Best Western Inn A $ 54.00 26 $ 842.40 $ 70.20 Budget Inn A $ 54.00 40 $ - - 1,296.00 $ 108.00 Capri Motel A $ 54.00 50 $ 1,620.00 $ _ 135.00 Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 52 $ 1,684.80 $ - 140.40 Courtyard Redwood City A $ 180.00 177 $ 19,116.00 $ 1,593.00 Days Inn A $ 54.00 68 $ 2,203.20 $ - 183.60 Deluxe Inn A $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ - 72.90 Garden Motel A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95 Good Nite Inn A $ 54.00 123 $ 3,985.20 $ 332.10 Holiday Inn Express RWC Central A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ - 164.70 Pacific Euro Hotel A $ 54.00 55 $ 1,782.00 $ - 148.50 Pacific Inn A $ 54.00 75 $ 2,430.00 $ - 202.50 Pullman San Francisco Bay A $ 360.00 421 $ 105,334.20 $ - 8,777.85 Redwood Creek Inn A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60 Redwood Motor Court A $ 54.00 12 $ 194.40 $ 16.20 Sequoia Inn A $ 54.00 22 $ 712.80 $ - - 59.40 TownePlace Suites Redwood Shores A $ 54.00 95 $ 3,078.00 $ 256.50 Room Total 1397 Total: $ 149,868.00 San Bruno Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment BayhillInn A $ 54.00 24 $ 777.60 $ 64.80 Comfort Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30 Courtyard by Marriott A $ 180.00 147 $ - 15,876.00 $ 1,323.00 Days Inn A $ 54.00 48 $ 1,555.20 $ 129.60 Gateway Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 31 $ 1,004.40 $ 83.70 Hotel Aura SFO A $ 54.00 49 $ - 1,587.60 $ 132.30 Ramada Limited A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ 164.70 Regency Inn A $ 54.00 31 $ - - 1,004.40 $ 83.70 Ritz Inn A $ 54.00 23 $ - 745.20 $ 62.10 Staybridge Suites A $ 180.00 92 $ 9,936.00 $ 828.00 Super 8 A $ 54.00 54 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80 Villa Montes Hotel A $ 90.00 41 $ - _2,214.00 $ 184.50 - - - - Room Total 630 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - Notal: $ 11,366.00 5 of 6 *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Belmont Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Bel Mateo Motel A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10 Belmont Palms A $ 54.00 14 $ 226.80 $ 18.90 Extended Stay America A $ 54.00 108 $ 3,499.20 $ 291.60 Holiday Inn Express & Suites A $ 90.00 82 $ 4,428.00 $ 369.00 Homewood Suites by Hilton A $ 90.00 96-$ 5,184.00 $ 432.00 Hotel Belmont A $ 54.00 16 $ 259.20 $ _ 21.60 - - Hyatt House A $ 90.00 132 $ 7,128.00 $ 594.00 _ Motel A $ 54.00 273 $ 8,845.20 $ 737.10 Silicon Valley Inn A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10 - SpringHill Suites Belmont - A $ 90.00 168 $ 9,072.00 $ 756.00 - Room Total 935 -- _ - - Total: $ 40,132.80 San Carlos Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Americas Best Value Inn A $ 54.00 32 $ 1,036.80 $ 86.40 Country Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 50 $ 1,620.00 $ 135.00 Extended Stay America A $ 90.00 116 $ 6,264.00 $ 522.00 Fairfield Inn & Suites A $ 54.00 112 $ 3,628.80 $ 302.40 LiA Hotel A $ 54.00 35 $ 1,134.00 $ 94.50 Residence Inn Redwood City -San Carlos A $ 90.00 204 $ 11,016.00 $ 918.00 San Carlos Inn A $ 54.00 10 $ 162.00 $ 13.50 Room Total 559 Total: $ 24,861.60 East Palo Alto Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Four Seasons Silicon Valley A $ 360.00 200 $ 50,040.00 $ 4,170.00 Palo Alto Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Americas Best Value Sky Ranch Inn C $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30 Berbeda Place C $ 54.00 18 $ 291.60 $ - 24.30 Cardinal Hotel Palo Alto C $ 54.00 60 $ 1,944.00 $ 162.00 The Clement Hotel C $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10 Comfort Inn Stanford C $ 54.00 70 $ 2,268.00 $ 189.00 Coronet Motel C $ 54.00 21 $ 680.40 $ 56.70 Country Inn Motel C $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ 72.90 Cowper Inn C $ 54.00 14 $ 226.80 $ - 18.90 Creekside Inn C 1 $ 180.00 136 $ 14,688.00 $ 1,224.00 6 of 6 *** SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS (ALL ZONES) FOR 2020 *** DRAFT / As of 1-1-20 Crowne Plaza Palo Alto C $ 360.00 195 $ 47,736.00 $ 3,978.00 Dinah's Garden Hotel C $ 360.00 129 $ 31,579.20 $ 2,631.60 Garden Court Hotel $ 360.00 62 $ 15,177.60 $ 1,264.80 Glass Slipper Inn $ 54.00 25 $ 810.00 $ _ 67.50 Hilton Garden Inn Palo Alto Ic $ 180.00 174$ 18,792.00 $ 1,566.00 Homewood Suites by Hilton Palo Alto $ 90.00 138 $ 7,452.00 $ 621.00 Hotel Keen $ 54.00 42 $ 1,360.80 $ 113.40 Hotel Parmani C $ 54.00 36 $ 1,166.40 $ 97.20 Oak Motel Palo Alto C $ 54.00 42 $ 1,360.80 $ 113.40 The Nest Palo Alto C $ 54.00 54 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80 Nobu Hotel Palo Alto C $ 360.00 77 $ 18,849.60 $ 1,570.80 The Palo Alto Inn C $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10 Sheraton Palo Alto C $ 360.00 355 $ 86,904.00 $ 7,242.00 Stanford Motor Inn C $ 54.00 37 $ 1,198.80 $ 99.90 Stanford Terrace Inn C $ 90.00 80 $ 4,320.00 $ 360.00 Travelodge Palo Alto Silicon Valley C $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30 The Westin Palo Alto C $ 360.00 184 $ 45,043.20 $ 3,753.60 The Zen Hotel C $ 54.00 37 $ 1,198.80 $ 99.90 Room Total 2117 Total: $ 309,042.00 Pacifica Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment Americas Best Value Inn B $ 54.00 25 $ 540.00 $ 45.00 Holiday Inn Express B $ 54.00 38 $ 820.80 $ 68.40 Inn at Rockaway B $ 54.00 44 $ 950.40 $ 79.20 Lighthouse Hotel B $ 180.00 97 $ 6,984.00 $ 582.00 Pacifica Beach Hotel B $ 90.00 52 $ 1,872.00 $ 156.00 Sea Breeze Motel B $ 54.00 20 $ 270.00 $ 22.50 Room Total 276 Total: $ 11,437.20 Brisbane Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Assessment DoubleTree by Hilton SFO North A $ 360.00 210 $ 52,542.00 $ - - 4,378.50 Homewood Suites by Hilton SFO North A $ 90.00 177 $ 9,558.00 $ 796.50 - Room Total 387 - - - - - - i - Total: $ - 62,100.00 r i F, � 4 jot A, ,GAJ 01 ffi F a, rJf r i F, � 4 jot A, ,GAJ 01 ffi F W ", _mum ■ 3 Lis Lij Lij Q m LL.,, ilk i j d 9, 17 ww. t a 041, diakm We .r r a� ,a r San Francisco is one of the most famous tourist spots in the world. Santa Clara county is home to Silicon Valley. But to get from one county to the other, you need to pass through the county where I live, San Mateo County. There's lots to do. Here's just a quick sample of some places you need to check out. Hiller Aviation The Hiller Aviation Museum was founded by helicopter pioneer Stanley Hiller Jr. and opened to the public in June 1998 and has continued to thrive ever since. Hiller features numerous airplanes, helicopters and fun, interactive flight simulators. The museum also hosts numerous events and it is one the best kid -friendly museums in the area. 54 K00-810.ONTHEGO Pelican Point Beach Pelican Point Beach is located near the end of Miramontes Point Road in Half Moon Bay. The beach is walkable north below the resort for quite a ways, except at high tide. At the other side of the resort property is the Redondo Beach Access. At low tide you can find tide pools to explore in either direction from the Pelican Point Beach public access. The larger and better-known Half Moon Bay Tide Pools are to the north below the resort. Paved paths follow the bluff to the lodge where you can eat at one of the restaurants or just take in the view from there. Devil's Slide Trail This is a 1.3 -mile multi -use trail, converted from a former segment of Highway 1, that gives hikers, runners, bicyclists and equestrians access the rocky heights of Devil's Slide above the Pacific Ocean. The trail is paved, with separate lanes for hikers and directional bike traffic. At provided overlooks, trail users may rest on benches and gaze through observation scopes and take in the view of the rocky coastal waters below. Filoli Mansion & Gardens Designed between 1915 — 1917 and set against the dramatic backdrop of the northern Santa Cruz Mountains in Woodside. Filoli is an excellent example of the Golden Age of American garden design and country house architecture. Filoli is recognized as one of the finest remaining country estates of the early 20th century and is a cherished resource for the community valuing education, volunteerism and diversity. Pigeon Point Lighthouse The 115 -foot Pigeon Point Lighthouse, one of the tallest lighthouses in America, has been guiding mariners since 1872. The lens stands 16 feet tall, 6 feet in diameter, and weighs 2,000 pounds. Although the original Fresnel lens is no longer in use, the lighthouse is still an active U.S. Coast Guard aid to navigation using a Vega Marine Rotating Beacon. Furthermore, the coastal areas surrounding Pigeon Point Light Station are rich with life. Marine mammals, such as seals and whales, can be seen regularly from shore as they pass by beyond the surf. Portola Discovery Site Located in the town of Pacifica, this is the site of the discovery of San Francisco Bay by Captain Gaspar de Portola and his party of sixty men. Hikers can hike to the top of the site and take in the breath -taking sight to see the tremendous expanse of the Bay Area. Next year, the site will be celebrating the 250th anniversary of the discovery of San Francisco Bay. Ano Nuevo State Park The park's Natural Preserve offers an extraordinary wilderness experience, where every year up to 10,000 elephant seals return to breed, give birth, and molt their skin amongst the scenic dunes and beaches. Making the part one of the largest mainland breeding colony for the northern elephant seal. In addition to the elephant seals, the park is also home to Brandt's and Pelagic Cormorants as well as California Sea Lions, Otters and harbor seals. , Fitzgerald Marine Reserve This rocky seashore hosts a living community of marine life that is of great interest to visitors and naturalists alike. A variety of seaweed, crabs, sponges, sea stars, mollusks, and fish make their homes here. Activities in the Reserve focus on education and interpretation of natural resources, including the ecosystems of the intertidal reef, beach, upland, and wetlands. In order to protect the sensitive natural resources of Fitzgerald Marine Reserve, groups of 10 or more are required to make reservations before visiting. Downtown Redwood City Enjoy a wide variety of street shopping, from eclectic clothing boutiques and jewelry shops to family-owned grocery stores, hobby shops, and global furniture stores. In addition, downtown Redwood City is the perfect place for theatre enthusiasts with the Fox Theatre, Broadway by the Bay and Dragon Theatre Productions all located there. Half Moon Bay Pumpkin Festival The world-famous Half Moon Bay Art & Pumpkin Festival is the autumn's signature event, drawing hordes of visitors to the "World Pumpkin Capital" for an epic festival on historic Main Street. Massive, mind-boggling, Volkswagen -sized weigh -off champion pumpkins are annually on display. Be patient trying to get there, as Highway 92 and Hiway 1 will be jammed. Guaranteed • K@0-810.ONTHEGO 55 AHINno.D 3N"IAA S,A37IVA N0Jl71S 3H1 ON AINno,) 031VW NO'S . W\,.6 e v 9 c Voy •'.a i keV a.u::: o � � ,w, u� A,,:, y. y y Sulpnj ul id tax op oj. noAioj meld is pad aEP xxq rale dall£g ut'JI S.pue 6zgna� e a b 1 � ,� ,„ \ ilM In jP. ilC FI ISI' Oilii!);d 9iijj 7nq — OOCIddJ3a SODA Ie S2OII(Pd aUIM 3a [. OE? RCI f. `JSli1O� j() rr�-- Arm 0%rmnoa dulm Itm. �.� to dlueaq agi+v ,::,... �'tBj}'C `Jla6irlv'1 alofft a x6}aid ot4,N as.qi aop I.q a isrj zsan53 aq1 y` mI" .'iwti 4 TP jnu4 i{}tM w')u.Padxd M,uy ui jo AEt3 loj d—j B 2Oiquio) ) AHINno.D 3N"IAA S,A37IVA N0Jl71S 3H1 ON AINno,) 031VW NO'S . W\,.6 y Voy •'.a i keV a.u::: o � � ,w, u� A,,:, y. Sulpnj ul id tax op oj. noAioj meld is pad aEP xxq rale dall£g ut'JI S.pue 6zgna� ale�uj laalal{cp a ui SuippaM a Sup— lo} cuoseal lno3 laiiein oty 8u1111— —ti inl-n ln"k 1 � ,� ,„ \ ilM In jP. ilC FI ISI' Oilii!);d 9iijj 7nq — OOCIddJ3a SODA Ie S2OII(Pd aUIM 3a [. OE? RCI f. `JSli1O� j() rr�-- Arm 0%rmnoa dulm Itm. �.� to dlueaq agi+v ,::,... �'tBj}'C `Jla6irlv'1 alofft a x6}aid ot4,N as.qi aop I.q a isrj zsan53 aq1 y` mI" .'iwti 4 TP jnu4 i{}tM w')u.Padxd M,uy ui jo AEt3 loj d—j B 2Oiquio) ) u Il p 'fjiI£pldod uiH-uT..S AIW—.Iloa al£ 1LLqulpp3 uotirlul-{j ad a 7 x 7I i7G1* i1lM !ft � .. AHINno.D 3N"IAA S,A37IVA N0Jl71S 3H1 ON AINno,) 031VW NO'S . MARRY Testarossa Winery www.testarossa.com Op the hill from the hotel is Testarossa Winery, which offers wine caves for hosting your guests for a tasting, wedding and/or reception. The night before your wedding, STAY Hotel . Los Gatos www.hotellosgatos.com DINE Dio Deka. www,diodeka.com WOODSIDE THOMAS FOGARTY WINERY & DINAH'S GARDEN HOTEL If you crave vineyard views, Thomas Fogarty Winery is the place to be. Located high on a ridge in the Santa Cruz Mountains, the property is peppered with vines that are curated to produce carefully crafted wines. The events facility is well thought out and includes multiple locations for events and can accommodate up to 216 guests. Bonuses are a bridal changing area and covered pavillon, which is perfect for a reception or a backup plan 1f it rains. MARRY Thomas Fogarty Winery www.fogartywtnerycom STAY DINE Dinah's Garden Hotel The Mountain House www.dinahshotel.com www.themountainhousecom SAN CARLOS / REDWOOD CITY DOMENICO WINERY & RESIDENCE INN For those that prefer more of an. urban vibe, the facilities at Domenico Winery are delightful. Their spacious event area is connected to their winemaking space and can accommodate up to 300 guests, It's quite impressive with Its hundreds of wine barrels and 30400t marble bar. Domenico also offers on-site catering and a fabulous selection of house - made wines. Nearby LV Mar offers tapas style dining and a diverse selection of cocktails all perfect for an intimate rehearsal dinner. MARRY Domenlco Winery www.domenicowinery.com STAY Residence Inn Redwood City/San Carp www.marriott.com COASTAL LANEBBIA WINERY & OCEANO HOTEL & SPA MARRY & STAY DRINK Ocearto Hotel & Spa La Nebbla Winery wwwoceanohalfmoonbaycom www.lanebbi2winery.com Piotagtaph.n Hadi. Gw.s-. o...g.Ph.tugrwphw Th.—rug.r[y wi-r�. - n...y0a.g Phataaraphy naw.ew:n wi.ery- cMs—. Ph".g.wphy 0—..I10A5sp. A..:rn.aPhot.grwphy D I N E IV Mar www.lvmar.com Craving a waterside wedding? Oceano Hotel & Spa has a lush outdoor space coupled with a lovely indoor area that is perfect for a wedding/reception combination or a rain plan if need be. A big plus is that guests can stay at the hotel, which has gorgeous rooms that overlook Pillar Point Harbor. Of course, getting wine from La Nebbia is a must, and Sam's Chowder [louse, which offers fresh seafood, is less than a mile away. DINE Sam's Chowder House wwwsanischowderhouse.corn ,1--fr. M.. Add chc plms.n of ridtiwg thew a�.wrt.,t:�ywaws A th—sh— J..We/ svn§- 36 3J LOS GATOS TESTA ROSSA WINERY HOTEL LOS GATOS s When you hear 'Silicon Valley" guests can dine on cuisine inspired thoughts may turn to technology, by Greece and the Mediterranean at yet tucked away in the southern tip Dio Deka, which is located at hotel is the quaint town of Los Gatos, a Los Gatos �� ���� �� thriving, area filled with locally owned ' boutiques fabulous restaurants, and 1 the lovely hotel Los Gatos Seemingly "t ' , straight out Tuscany, this location ± ;° boasts spacious rooms and many a� amenities. MARRY Testarossa Winery www.testarossa.com Op the hill from the hotel is Testarossa Winery, which offers wine caves for hosting your guests for a tasting, wedding and/or reception. The night before your wedding, STAY Hotel . Los Gatos www.hotellosgatos.com DINE Dio Deka. www,diodeka.com WOODSIDE THOMAS FOGARTY WINERY & DINAH'S GARDEN HOTEL If you crave vineyard views, Thomas Fogarty Winery is the place to be. Located high on a ridge in the Santa Cruz Mountains, the property is peppered with vines that are curated to produce carefully crafted wines. The events facility is well thought out and includes multiple locations for events and can accommodate up to 216 guests. Bonuses are a bridal changing area and covered pavillon, which is perfect for a reception or a backup plan 1f it rains. MARRY Thomas Fogarty Winery www.fogartywtnerycom STAY DINE Dinah's Garden Hotel The Mountain House www.dinahshotel.com www.themountainhousecom SAN CARLOS / REDWOOD CITY DOMENICO WINERY & RESIDENCE INN For those that prefer more of an. urban vibe, the facilities at Domenico Winery are delightful. Their spacious event area is connected to their winemaking space and can accommodate up to 300 guests, It's quite impressive with Its hundreds of wine barrels and 30400t marble bar. Domenico also offers on-site catering and a fabulous selection of house - made wines. Nearby LV Mar offers tapas style dining and a diverse selection of cocktails all perfect for an intimate rehearsal dinner. MARRY Domenlco Winery www.domenicowinery.com STAY Residence Inn Redwood City/San Carp www.marriott.com COASTAL LANEBBIA WINERY & OCEANO HOTEL & SPA MARRY & STAY DRINK Ocearto Hotel & Spa La Nebbla Winery wwwoceanohalfmoonbaycom www.lanebbi2winery.com Piotagtaph.n Hadi. Gw.s-. o...g.Ph.tugrwphw Th.—rug.r[y wi-r�. - n...y0a.g Phataaraphy naw.ew:n wi.ery- cMs—. Ph".g.wphy 0—..I10A5sp. A..:rn.aPhot.grwphy D I N E IV Mar www.lvmar.com Craving a waterside wedding? Oceano Hotel & Spa has a lush outdoor space coupled with a lovely indoor area that is perfect for a wedding/reception combination or a rain plan if need be. A big plus is that guests can stay at the hotel, which has gorgeous rooms that overlook Pillar Point Harbor. Of course, getting wine from La Nebbia is a must, and Sam's Chowder [louse, which offers fresh seafood, is less than a mile away. DINE Sam's Chowder House wwwsanischowderhouse.corn ,1--fr. M.. Add chc plms.n of ridtiwg thew a�.wrt.,t:�ywaws A th—sh— J..We/ svn§- 36 3J Sustentabilidad al Plato En la regi6n estadounidense de Silicon Valley, el acelerado avance tecnol6gico contrasta con las propuestas gastron6micas que estfin cada vez mcAs en sintonia con la naturaleza. Los lugarenos exaltan to que ofrecen el Campo y el mar a trav6s de una cocina franca y respetuosa con el medio ambiente, cuenta Mariana Vega FOTOS: CHARLY PAWS n los anos 70, el sllicio fue utilizado para producir an masa los chips do los microprocesadores computacionales. EI boom comenz6 on el condado de San Mateo, California, donde se establecieron coda vez mAs compaftias dedicadas a este giro. Con el paso del tiempo, la fiebre por to tecnologia se contagi6 a los alrededores, y IS, regi6n se gan6 el ncmbre de Silicon Valley. Abarcando mss de 25 ciudades y pueblos, el hogar de algunas de las marcas de software mSs importantes del mundo as tambi6n un paraiso de sabores locales, ya que an muchos restaurantes ofrecen preparations donde la sustentabilidad as el ingrediente principal. Estoy ansiosa de recorrerio y descubrir la rare p000 conocida de este valle. La travesia comienza al partir de San Francisco hacia el sur. A medida que la ciudad se queda WAS, la carretera regala extraordinarias postales an las qua la naturaleza as protagonista. Mi destino as Half Moon Bay, donde Ilego a la hors de la cena. EI sitio elegido as un de los restaurantes populares de la localidad, y eso as siempre un buen indicio. Justo an el coraz6n del pueblo se ubica Pasta Moon. Ahl. desde hace 33 anos, to chef Kimberly Levin realiza exquisitos platillos con ingradientes org5nicos y de temporada provenlentes de 15 diferentes granjas de California. La frescura de los productos locales expresa su esplendor an la ensalada de durazno y los ejotes tempura. Originaria de Iowa, Kimberly vivi6 an una granja duranta su juventud. "Creci con el estilo de vida farm -to -table, pues desde muy pequena aprendi, at lado de mi abuela, a culfivar y a crier mis alimentos", recuerda. Su amor por la pasta —qua elabora a mano todos los dlas— Ileg6 despu6s, cuando se fue a vivir un tiempo a Italia con la familia de un amigo. Desde entonces, he regresado numerosas veces al pais europeo, cuyos sabores ha logrado capturar an sus platillos. Entre las recetas tradiclonales que ostenta el menti, se encuentra la lasana (que prepare con salchicha sicikana hecha an case y quesos ricotta y parmesan), el tagliatelle a la bolonesa y el espagueti a la putanesca. Cerca de Half Moon Bay se encuentra Pillar Point Harbor, y por to manana es el major momento para visitarlo. Este puerto alberga coma de 200 butes pesqueros y, a poser del frio, me aventuro a hacer kayak. Las aguas son calmas y an el muelle se pueden divisor algunos pelicans. AI Ilegar a tierra, sob puedo pensar an una cosa: clam chowder. Y as que esta reconfortante sopa as muy apreciada an esta parte de la costa caflforniana. No hate faRa caminar mucho antes de Ilegar a Sam's Chowder House, donde se prepare este dasico an dos de sus versions mSs famosas: Nueva Inglaterra y Manhattan. Ambas se elaboran con almejas, pero la primera consta de salsa bechamel, mientras que la Segundo se realize con jitomate. La recomendad6n as instalarse an to terraza, pues desde SIR se aprecia el panorama marRimo que ofrecen las embarcaciones on el puerto. Este restaurante cuenta con ha certificaci6n As Fresh As it Gets, que garantiza que los ingredientes utilizados son frescos y producidos localmente. Para comprobarlo, baste prober el lobster roll, un sandwich de langosta aderezado con mantequilla; IS, ensalada de Sandia con cangrejo o el cioppino, un suculento estofado de marisoos. Luego del almuerzo, sigo la linea costera an direcc16n a Pescadero, un pueblo granjero ubicado a menos de 30 minutos. Resulta inevitable detenerse a un lado del camino para admirar brevemente el Pigeon Point Lighthouse, uno de los 6Himos faros de California que aun permanecen an pie. Aunque ya no se utilize para guiar a los marineros, esta construcci6n que data de 1872 se ha convortido an un bellisimo mirador al Pacifico, y desde los acantilados sobre los que se Size, se re0nen a pasar la tarde algunos pescadores aficionados. AI Ilegar a Pescadero, la prevaleciente arquRectura r6stica decimon6nica, combinada con amplios espacios abiertos rodeados de verdes montanas, crea un paisaje que atrapa la mirada. Toro la puerta an Harley Farms, una granja de mss de 100 anos de antig0edad. —� room a mnv.. ss VIA ZERO GOURMET EN ESTA PAG., DE ARRIBA ABAJO: PAISPJES DE HALF MOON BAY; AC HOTEL SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT: BURLINGAME DOWNTOWN Aqui as, producen 45 tipos diferernes de queso orgAnico. La leche se obtiene del centenar de cobras qua habitan an libre pastoreo. Los vishantes pueden acercarse y acariciarlas o dirigirse a la pequena tienda, an to qua se ofrecen, edemas de quesos de cobra, diversos productos artesanales como aceites con especias, jaleas a incluso jabones. En la parte superior del lugar se encuentra un pequeno recinto con una mesa large de madera y algunes sillas fallacies a mano, donde se haven a Cabo canes privadas dos veces al mes, utas constan de cuatro tiempos, elaborados solo con productos orgAri Para asistr, se dobe adquirir la entrada con anticipaci6n, pues tienen una gran demands. Despu6s de recorrer of pintoresco centro de este pueblo, regreso a Half Moon Bay para merendar an of embrujado Moss Beach Distillery. Segi omenta la leyenda, durable Is epoca de la prohibici6n, cuando el restaurants, era un bar clandestino, una mullet Casada se enamor6 del pianista qua amenizaba las noshes, y cuando el marido de Esta se enter6 de la infidelidad, fue a buscarla. Noble Saba to qua sucedi6, Pero al dia siguiente, ella apareci6 muerta sobre la playa. Se dice qua su espfrhu merodea los alrededores, donde se le conoce Como Blue Lady. Apenas cruzo la Puerta de entrada al restaurants, percibo una atm6sfera extraria, Pero todo pass a Segundo piano cuando me deleho con la vista al mar. La propuesta gastron6mica de Moss Beach Distillery as perfecta para una tarda re4ada con amigos, entre platillos desenfadados on porclones para oompartir y cocteles reirescantes. Pido coast siders (una orden de tres minihamburguesas de mariscos servidas con papas a la francesa), linguini di mare y de postre of pudin de pan. Y mientras observo el atardecer a troves de los ventanales, saboreo el coctel de vodka, triple sec y cunasao, qua rinde homenaje al amigable fantasia porque lleva su nombre. Antes de dolor atrAs este pueblo—famoso por su festival anual de one y calabazas—, oomienzo el dia haciendo una parade an Half Moon Bay Art Glass. Alli Douglass Brown, un carismAtico artesano, enseria a fabricar toda close de plazas de vidrio soplado. Elijo entre los TEAS de dos mil colorer qua bene disponibles, y me dispongo a crear un Bovero, una de las piezas mAs sencillas de su catAlogo de escuhuras policromaticas y figures complejas. Es indispensable colocarse guantes especiales y seguir las indicaciones de seguridad, Pero of proceso as relajante y divertido. Al terminar mi obra de arta, me dirijo an busca de una cope de vino a La Nebbe Winery, qua se encuentra a un oostado. La propietaria de este tasting room, Kendyl Kellogg, abandon6 el mundo corporativo para seguir su pasi6n: Is viniculture. A poser de qua California as reconocido por sus Vince, no todas las regiones cuentan con el tenpin rxecesado Para qua las vides desarrollen todo su potencial. Half Moon Bay as una de estas; sin embargo, los lugareficis ban optado por establem bodegas donde producen ca dos a panic de was reeolectadas an otras zonas. En La Nebbia Wineryse usan varietalescorno zinfandel, cabernet sauvignon y Chardonnay provenientes de Areas Vhicuhurales Americans (AVAs, por sus siglas an ingles) de California. a4 I FOOD a TRAVEL EN ESTA PAG. DESDE ARRIBA, DE IZO. A DER: DOUGLASS BROWN CON UNA PIEZA DE CRISTAL SOPLADO; FILOU; TERRAZA DE SAMS'S CHOWDER HOUSE; LOBSTER ROLL; PASEO POR PILLAR POINT HARBOR; HALF MOON BAY KAYAK CO.; CHEF MANUEL MARTINEZ; MOUSSEDE FRAMBUESA CON CHOCOLATE EN LV MAR; EL BAR DE SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT WATERFRONT Silicon Valle/ se encuentra an at estado tle California an Eslados tlnidos y se extiende castle San Francisco haste Palo Nto, La monocle as el d6lar estadounidense y Is temperature promedio ronda los 15 °C. Como Magor AeromAxico (aemmexico.coN vuela directo de Ciudad its M6xico a San FraricLsco. Vials tedondo desde $5,953 MXN, Recursos San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (smccvb.com) ofrece informao6n aceta de Los sips de riteres an 'a zona, guias de vale y un caleneario con los eventos eniturales y gastron6micos mils importar,es Donde comer Pasta Moon Un restaurante confortable para disfrutar aut6ntica oomida ifeana. pastamoon.com Sam's Chowder House Aqui as encuensan los frutos del mar MAS frescos qua podras prober. Su privilegiada ubicaci6n kente al puerto regale tardes agmdables. samschowderhouse.com La Vlga Seafood 8 Cockle Mexicana Inspirado an el conocido memado de mariscos, an este espacio se recrean recetas Iradicionales de todo M6xico favigaseafood.com LV Mar Prueba las tapas y no to pierdas los cocteles con mezcal y otros destiados de agave ivmaii The Sea by Alexander's Steakhouse Su atm6sfera ejecutiva y sof Stieda as parte del encanto. D?jate so prender par el merxi tle degustac16n de slate tiempos. afexanderssteakhouse.com Moss Beach Dlatillery Cue las historias tle fantasias no to quiten las gams de visitarlo En realldad as un lugar vanquilo y de comida copiosa, donde las mascotas son bienvenidas. mossbeaddskflerycom San Francisco Airport Marriott Waterfront Es uno de los cargos de convenciones mos grandes de Silicon Valley. Los desayunos de su restaurante Hangar Steals son imperdibles, Iasi tanto Como Is vista de los aviones del aeropuerto de San Francisco al despegar, qua se puede disfrutor a haves de los encrmes ventanales del bar, Habitaci6n doble desde $209 USD. mamottcom Creeludde Inn Hosp&date an una de sus amplias estancias rodeadas de vegetacirin mantras visitas Palo Alto. Habitacbn sencilla desde $739 USD. creekside-inn.com Beach House Hotel Ofrece todo to qua se espera de un acogedor hotel de playa, mos la experience its ver el amanecer anVe las embarcaomes de Pillar Point Harbor Habltaci6n cuAdruple desde $325 USD, beach-house.com AC hotel Sen Francisco Akport Su diseno vanguardsta y espacios remnfortantes invitan al descanso. EI menu del restaurante conserve la esence espakla de la mare y pa las Farces, an el bar se realize un espedilculo its cocteleria Habitaci6n doble desde $169 USD. mardolt rom Entre ellas, Napa Valley, Santa Ynez Valley, Mendocino County o Monterey County. En esta vinicola se producen todo tipo de Vince, desde tintos hasta fortlficados. Disfruto un espumoso blanco y Wal mientras Kendyl me muestra la propieciad, qua cuenta con un patio trasero para realizar picnics, jugar al aire libre y degustar vino, por supuesto. Segi me platica, adi de degustaciones, se haven a Cabo eventos Barrel to Bottle, donde of p6blico puede acudir a Ilenar su propla botella con las producciones de la bodega. Para conocer m6.s sobre of vino de Silicon Valley, Ilego a la Ciudad de San Carlos. EI Sol brilla con intensiciad y nada queda de la neblina de Is Costa Este. Aqui se he instalado una decena de vinicolas qua ofrecen a los vishantes dMersas experiencias enol6gicas y gastron6micas; una de ellas as Domenico. Esta bodega se caracteriza por la fur i6n de la tmdici6n vinicola californlana y la haliana. Se localize an una antigua imprenta qua fue totalmente transformada para ofrecer una experiencia complete y placentera a los viajeros. I I--'- - -. - , I EI lugar cuenta con un salt de eventos y un tasting room decorado con m6rmol blanco y negro, "inspirado en los anos 50", de acuerdo con to que me cuenta Nick Chirichillo, cull Ileva los negocios de to marcs. "Este espacto este dedicado al p6blico; aqui ofreoemos degustaci6n de vinos y snacks, como paninis, pizza o ensaladas para acompanar". En la parte posterior de la propieciad se producen roes de 20 etiquetas a partir de varietales tipicos ltalianos como primltivo, sangiovese, nebbioto y nero d'Avola; cultivados en Amador County, California. Redwood City se encuentra sldicientemente cerca de San Carlos para Ilegar antes de la core. Me dinjo a La Viga Seafood & Cocina Mexicana, un restaurante cuya fachada ostenta un mural de to estaci6n del metro del mismo nombre an Ciudad de Mexico. EI chef Manuel Martinez ha llevado recetastradicionales mexicanas —como los camarones al c 000 y el pescado zarandeado— a los comensales estadounidenses en este espacio "chiquito y curiosito", Como el mismo to define. Comprometido con el use de productos que no generen un impacto negativo en el medio ambiente, asegura user solo manscos capturados de manera sustentable. Su carriers, como la de muchos mexicanos que emigran at pais del norte, he estado marcada por el esfuerzo y In perseverancia. "IJegue a San Francisco hate 23 anos, aprendi ingles y full ganando oportunidades en diversas oocinas. Asl adquirf experiencia", narra el chef mexiquense. A una calles de distancia se encuentra LV Mar, otro de sus restaurantes, al que Ilegamos caminando. EI concepto sigue el hilo conductor de la comida mexicana con una reinterpretaci6n —que se expresa an platillos como el ceviche, las tlayudas y Is carne asada— acompanada de coctelerla y un ambiente casual. Mientras anochece, se antoja un postre, y Is mousse de trambuesa con chocolate del chef Martinez es ideal para endulzar el paladar. La rule at sur nos heva al 6ftvno punto del recorrido por Silicon Valley: Palo Alto. Hogar de la Universidad de Stanford, este ciudad es tambien conocida por albergar las seder de companies como Facebodc. Apple y Google. Aunque no este permitiata la entrada a ninguna de ellas, muchos turistas visitan el lugar solo para tomarse una same al lado de los letreros gigantes que se localizan en las entradas de los edificios. EI use de la tecnologia se puede apreciar por doquier: desde cargadores electricos para autos Tesla, ubicados en los estacionamientos, hasta numerosas bicicletas de Is marca Un ike, que los ciclistas alquilan por medio de una app. Luego de pesear entre las amplias calles de los suburbios, Ilego a The Sea by Alexander's Steakhouse, un elegante restaurante donde los frutos del mar se fusionan con tecnicas eontemporaneas y guihos a la gastronomla oriental. La oocina es abierta y a cargo se encuentra el chef Yu Min Lin, quien perfaccion6 sus habilidades culinarias en diversas provincial asieticas como Taipei, Tokio y ShanghSi. Con ingredientes de temporada producidos on Palo Alto y que el selections personalmente, ofrece platillos donde deja de EN ESTA PAG. DE ARRIBA A ABAlO: LA BARRA DE MOSS BEACH DISTIILERY; COCTELES PROHIBmIXJ MT Al Y THE BLUE LADY; LINWNE DI MARE; LA NEBBIA WINERY: PROPUESTA ENOL6GICA DE SILICON VALLEY: DELICIA RALIANA DE PASTA MOON manifesto su espirltu creativo, a troves de presentaciones espectaculares y combinations de sabor inusitadas. EI lugar sob abre a Is hora de to cena, pero bien vale esperar a que Ilegue la media tarde para prober delicias tomo los shots de hamachi: refrescantes entredas trials a base de este pescado, mezdado con aguacate, toques de jengibre, salsa ponzu y semillas de ajonjoli; o las rocas de langosta, un plato con suaves trozos de crust6ceo cubtertos con una crujiente caps de tinta de calamar, sobre pure de almendra y alinados con salsa de trufa negra. Claro que para degustar al maximo to experiencia culinaria de The Sea by Alexander's Steakhouse, ordenar el menu maridaje de siete tiempos es una gran idea, si se Ilega antes de las 20:30 horas. La carta de vinos que ofrece acompanamiento a los magnifcos platillos cuenta con etiquetas de todo el mundo, aunque la mayor parte proviene de vinedos cal'dornianos. La sommeliers del lugar me recomienda una cope de cabernet r sauvignon de las montanas de Santa Cruz. Me detengo un momento a disfrular el primer sorbo y el final de mi aventura, que no me he del dudes: a mediate que la tecnologia se desarrolla coda vez m6s a prise, se vuelve indispensable voltear hacia Is naturaleza y valorar to que nos regale. Silicon Valley es el mejor ejemplo de to que ese equilibrio puede logrer. 0 Charly Ramos y Manana Vega vialaron a Silicon Valley, cortesta de San Mateo County/Silicon Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. Half Moon Bay Kayak Co. DisfMa un paseo tmnquilo y silencioso an kayak entre las embarcacienes de Pillar Point Harbor No ini si eres prindponte, los esvuctores le elgllicar6n todo to recall para que dishutes al m6ximo el worrido lynbkzyak.com Burlingame downtmm Carina por el centro de este cillida ciudad, que algunos dias se Ilona de eolaes con mercados itineraries, donde los productores locales vender sus alkvos. Usha el bar Barelhouse y pogunta por la happy hour smccvb.corn Computer History Museum Ulo Gado a solo 15 minutce de Palo Nto, este museo muesna la evoluci6n de la temol ia, desde que los pumeros artefactos para contar fueron irventados, haste los ni recientes avances de la irndigencia artificial. tvmWterhisfory.orgivisit Half Moon gay Golf Links Este compo de golf de 36 hoyos se an sobre un acantiudo a la cola del mer y lue dlsenado por los golfistes Arnold Palma y Mhur Hills EI juego dura cerca de cavo horas. halhramoapitiffcorn Hiller Avialbn Museum Con una celecci6n de cerca de 50 aerataves --originales y repeals—, este centro intaactrvo garani m buen Tato de entretenirrento para chicon y glandes, pues adenri de la exhbici6n permanente, an el sugar se Ilevan a cabo talleres y acts idades kidicas Wei Mail Esta preciosa propiedad de arquitectaa geagiana se localize an Woodside. Con una supergde de 654 acres, ostenta exuberantes jardines que indtas a ser recorridos Cmdertos y tversas advidades Hantr6pcas se levan a Cabo an el lugar filofl org 0 uu Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Pays: FR Periodicite : Mensuel OJD : 30415 M Page 219 Em SAN FRANCISCO (USA) 1,,(;# 1)('1ic Tous droits reserves a I'editeur Situee sur la cote ouest des Etats-Unis, dans l'etat de Californie, la region de San Francisco regorge de parcours de toute Beaute. Parmi eux, quelques pepites ouvertes au public: l'Qld Course et l'Ocean Course du resort d'Ha f Moon Bay Golf Links, le trace historique du Presidio et le TPC Harding Park, un 18 trous taille pour les grandes epreuves. DE NOIRE ENYOYt SP CIAL EN CAIIFORNU DENIS GORAN (FEXTE) PHOTOS DR CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 Pays: FR Periodicite : Mensuel OJD : 30415 ®® Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Page 319 Tous droits reserves A 1'editeur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Pays: FR P6riodicit6 : Mensuel OJD : 30415 M Page 419 Tous droits reserves 6 1'6diteur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 Pays: FR Periodicite : Mensuel OJD : 30415 NO-- TPC O IPC Hordinq Pork arbixe fees les utouts des gronds p5rr w -t cwc ses fairways imoeccobies, "s bo nkess oNr*q& et ses greens pot(oits On 4 joue coimrm an decour m sine ceuvre d'ort ove ernie et m pert. Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Page 5/9 Tous droits reserves a 1'editeur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 Date: Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Pays: FR Periodicite : Mensuel OJD:30415 w Page 619 Tous droits reserves 6 1'editeur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 Pays: FR Periodicit6 : Mensuel OJD : 30415 ®® epuis toujours, San Francisco occupe une place a part dansla socittt amtricaine. Aujourd'hii ville sanctuaire, la vitt californienne assure protection aux migmms; sans papiers, cornme elle accueillit, dans les anodes 1850, les emigrants de la ruEe vers l'or venus en nombre par la porte dome (Golden Cate), laquelle donna son nom au pont qui vit le jour en 1937, aprts quatre annees de construction. Litt mouvement Black Panther au Summer of love de 1967 qui donna naitsarice an Clower Prower, The city by the bay fut de toes les combats avant-gardistes et eomestatai res. Aujourdbui, San Francisco dtploie des tresors d1magination dans la tutte eontre le changement climatique, err operant notantment true forte mutation ecolog*e Une volonte de changemem palpable, relayte et arnpliEee par les nouveaux modes de consummation des employes des grarides entreprises iinplantees dans la Silicon Valley, au sud de la ville. Ft c'est par le sud justement nue San Francisco s'offre IM Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Page 719 aux }'tux des touristesA Angeles par choisf e, n rear n- « Le TPC Hardin Park toad -trip depuis Las Angeles par exemple, err remon- tant la ctltbre Pacific Coast Highway. tDccasion de de- p couvrir des lieu.�s magiques pour la pratique du golf, accueill i y VUS—P a 1 1 Cit G 2020. rornme la bale de Carmel cat ses parcours legendaires Cypress Point, Spyglass Hill etbien stirPebble ,Beach Pour VoCt,..asio14 les fairways qui aecueillera cel tit la 119` edition de 1'lJS Opeiie,i , AU SORD DU PACIFIQUE En arrivant par le sud, a une cinquantaine de kilo - mares de San Francisco, les golfeurs feront one halte dans la localitt de Hag Moon Bal: Sur place, ils trou- verom un complete golfique avec deur parcours dix- huit trous, Wld Course et rOceanCourse. t Old Course reste le parcours reference du Half Moon le ap Golf Links. Crit en 1973 par Arnold Palmer, c'est un'parkiand as tract typiquemenc atntricain qui neces- site toutefois d'adapter de tonnes strategies, notam- ment au moment` de choisir la position de sa barle sur des greens redoutables. C3omme pour l'Ocean Course, le finish est spectoc-ulaire avec le fairway du 18, im par4 de 351 metres, positionnt au bord du Paciftque et un green love alit pied du Ritz-Carlton. allous avons mis en place tine offre tan;%dre qui permet de jouer un deu- Wme parcoun told ou Warr) dans la journte pour 66 de Ousx, cone Bill Murray, manager general des lieux. Avec une pause savoureuse au Mullins Bair & Grill entre les deux parcours, on nest pas loin de la jour - nee parfaite! CEutyre d'Amoid Palmer, l"Old Course est' un parkland de 6044 metres. Maiheureusement, en decembre, lots de notre passage a HMB, le Old Course dtait imprati cable en raison dcs fortespluies. Les golfeurs du jour etaient done invites a jouer rOcean Course, par 72 de 5916 rni tres signc Arthur Hills, ce qui fut loin d'eire une punitioni L"Ocean Course porte bien son nom au premier trou, avec le green de ce Ring par 4 post au bard du Pacfique. ll Taut ensuite patienter jusqu'au 12 pour revoir i'octan et en prendre plein les yeux Les deux trous du finish sant spectaculaires. Le par 3 du 17 (136 m), dont le pe- tit green semble post en erlwhbre sur le bord de la falaise balayee seront deuxfois plus etroits!» J par un vent lateral de gauche a droite ntcessite un coup bas, ltgerement en draw Mais attention, car un slice vous tloigne du precipice, un hook ne vousdonnem pas le sourire! Quant au par 5 du 113, long de 481 m, it longe la falaise et permet.aux promenneurs qui partagent le intone chemin que les voiturettes, de voir les golfeurs en action. Earrivte se fait au pied de I'imposant Rita Carlton,comme le 18 de l'Old Course. TAILU POUR LES GRANDS CHAMPIONNATS ii Le golf du nord de to Caiijornie est tres hl-lic, affirme Tom Smith, manager gen>iral du TPC Harding Park De Monter" d San Francisco, les clubs ont vu nadtrr et s' J'ronter certains des plus grands goljeurs de taus les temps., De plus, la re=gion a attire 1'un des architectes les plus reputes do l7 istoiregotfzque, Alister MacKenzie. Des tpreuves prestigieuses, les grands golfs de Satz Francisco en ont accuelli quelques-unes, effectivement. Le golfprivt The Olympic a par exemple heberge cinq editions de WS Open, dont la derniere, en 2012, fut rem- ponft par rAmerieain Webb Simpson. Golf municipal public, Harding Park West pas en reste avec 1'organisadon de deux Presidents Cup en seize arts (2009 et 2025), la venue du Champions Tour en 2010 et 2011 et surtoutl'accueil du 102` USPGA en mai 2020. Badge TPC pour «Tournament Players Club », Harding Park est un bijou qui deploie ses immenses fairways sur les rives du lac Merced, dont it partage la quietude avec The Olympic. Situt dans un pare public ou fern vient flaner, jogger, promener ses chiens ou faire du canoe, Harding Park respire le golf. lci, tout a ere bien pense sur cc site d'e_xcep- tion qui fut,jadis une Terme ort ron cultivaft fa<laitue, grace a IIrtigation en eau douce fourme Par le lac Merced. Une large zone d'entminement, comprenam on practice dote dune vingtaine de poster, amsi qu'une zone de chipping et de putting, aecucille lesgolfeurs. Un second ,putting green, situt juste a cote du depart du 1, per net de se fa- miliariserune demitre toisavec 'excepticn- n lle mule des greens. Surprise divine dans un pays oir la v oitureue est au golfeur ce que Tous droits reserves 6 I'editeur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 G LF N E_ PRESIDIO GOLF COURSE wwrpreiidi0noif.Som Presidio cal, Course (4$1): 5580 m (blancs), par 72 Arahbocks: Tam Simpson x el HerbertCer (1921) Ort" -fen: -fen:: dde Fir 6 EM r �j �! OF rsI AA., '. y v. Pays : FR Periodicite : Mensuel OJD : 30415 ®® Date : Mai 2019 Journaliste : DENIS CORAN Page 9/9 la basket est au joggeur, it est passible de jouer le TPC Harding, Park a pied! Et pour un golf de cc calibre, p change tout. Vu la topographic tres plate, le parcours se fait sans rsel'effort, si cc nest la concentration inhereme a ce type de trace tips stlectif, Avec ses 6259 metres des boules bleues O'equivalent des blanches chez nous), it ne Taut pas charner pour en vvnir a bout! 1'appellanon TPC se merite et la qual4t est an rendez-vows. Departs taillss au cordeau, larges fairww-^ays de,tres sande gtualite a tonte croisee„roughs savatnment encretenus, bunkers immucu- les et greens.a la mule parfane, Harding Park affiche la meme qualite que le Golf National durant la Ryder Cup, e est tout dire 1 Et en 2020, it offrtra aux golfeurs qui viendront le defier un visage different, bien plus s6lectif encore. x Nous travail - tons sans reldche pour que la qualat du parcours reste to meme, test une obligation en tont que TPC, emplique Tom Smith. Pour l' USPGA 2020, on divisera la Iargeur des Jairwuys par deux. Les roughs seront durcis et dett4es et les greens auront one route bier superieure. Cest un travail que nous avvns deja this en plan et qui va s1raensifier en 2019:, Chaque annee, TPC Harding Park accueille environ 90000 golfeurs, dont 65 % sant des residents de San Francisco, 25 %des joueurs americans et 10 % des golleurs strangers: DANS LES PAIS DE ROQKVW Er PAUM Si liarding Park est situd au sud de la ville, lePresidia Golf Coarse est lui positionne tout an nord, tout Pres du Golden Gate Bridge. Pour autant,.on ne visit jamais le celsbre pont orange -depuisle parecours, mais seule- ment des vues partielles sur quelques-unes des cin- quante coilines qui ceignent San Francisco, comme Rus- sian Hill ou Nob Nill. Construit en 1895, le Presidio fut d'abord un 9 trous reserve aux alitciers de 1'artude eantonnss dares le fort militaire et aux membres du club prive eponyme qui compte encore aujourd'hui plus de 800 personnes. En 1406, le golf servit de base de rept aux survivants du trernblement de teas qut fit quelque 3 000 mons. Etendu a 18 !nous en 1910, le parcours a ete redessine, allonge et dote d'un syst@me d'arrosage automatique en 1921. *Les"idents Theodore Roose- velt et Dwight D. Eisenhower mais suss -t` les jouctirs de base- r Dompter les greens au grain Cres prononce et a la rroule rap de est Vau t re grande jfcculte du Presio. » bait Joe Di Maggio a Babe Ruth ou encore Arnold Palmer ttaient des fans incondi- tlonnels du parcours p, precise Don Chelemedos, manager general du Presidio. Avant'd'ajouter: o,Chaque annee, 63000 golJeurs viennent jouer ici», C:ontrairement a Harding Park, Presidio nest pas taille pour les competitions intemationales, Avec-ses 5 92 ntt'.ttes des back -tees, it aurait bier du mat 8 se dsfendre face aux canonniers du PGA Tour. Le plus long des quatre par 5 de cc par 72 fair 480 ti titres, done touchable en deux par de bons amateurs. Les difficultes sent pourtant bien Msentes sur ce parcours plus que centenaire, commc ces bunkers sauvTges et profonds qui necessitent toucher dMirat et precision. Dampter les greens au grain tres prononcs' et a la route rapide est 1'autre grannie diffitulte dtt Presidio dont l'aurait principal reste Is riehesse de son passe. Savoir que des per- sonmages historiques et des:legendes du sport ont rencontre les memes difftcultes A I`attaque d'un green on saute de joie pour un meme birdie, Ca donne une toute autre dimension a vorre pantie. Et des souvenirs inoubliables... • Tous droits reserves a 1'editeur CALIFORNIE 8064156500502 FOOD & TR $4.99US $4.99CAN 1 9 2> o 71486 01665 6 O CO ---------- VISITSANMATEOCOUNTY.COM #PLAYBYTHEBAY CALIFORNIAf� THE BEST OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA V�/ ou want a vacation spot with Pacific beaches, wine tasting, San i Bay views, amazing dining, cultural activities,,great golf, endless rec- >nal activities, microbreweries and cool selfie spots. You'll find it all in one San Mateo County/Silicon Valley. When you land on the San Francisco Bayside, you can head for a selfie in front of the iconic Facebook sign or Hewlett Packard garage. Or you might start your trip with a wine class at the top notch San Francisco Wine School in South San Francisco. (You can follow a class with a visit to Armstrong Brewery downstairs.) Once you're feeling smarter, try an urban wine tour in the city of San Carlos. Walk from Domenico Winery to Cuvee Winery to Russian Ridge to Flying Suitcase to Old County Cellars, getting your tasting on! Consider heading to Noelani's for Hawaiian food (and music), and then walk up the street to Savanna Jazz to catch a show. Still on the hunt for food and wine? Grab a ride or hop on Caltrain to Redwood City, where you'll find endless sidewalk cafes. Upscale restaurants abound, such as Donato Enoteca, LV Mar and La Viga. Want nightlife? Enjoy dinner and a show at Angelica's or catch a musical at the Fox Theatre. Feeling more ca- sual? Head over to Gourmet Haus Staudt, a German beer garden and site of the legendary lost Apple (phone prototype. And speaking of beer, locals love Freewheel Brewing Company in Redwood City. As your itinerary progresses, you may opt to head south to Palo Alto for a gour- met meal at The Sea by Alexander' Steak House or the historic MacArthur Park, or to A. Space Gallery in Menlo Park for some art appreciation. Make sure to hit the free Cantor Arts Center, home to the world's second largest Rodin exhibit. 52 1 FOOD &'I -RAVEL SPRING Another option is to head north to the City of San Mateo, where restaurants and outdoor dining establishments are in abundance. Enjoy a high end dinner at Porterhouse Restaurant with dry -aged steaks, seafood at Pacific Catch or an eclectic menu at the Zagat-rated Pausa. Want seafood overlooking a scenic lagoon? Opt for the Fish Market. For culture, stop at Filoli Mansion and Gardens, a National Historic Landmark. Filoli has been used in multiple TV shows and movies, including Dynasty, Nash Bridges, The Wedding Planner, Heaven Can Wait, and Rent. Drive past Crystal Springs Reservoir and head "over the hill", to the Half Moon Bay/Coastside. Make a stop at La Nebbia Winery for a tasting and bocce ball and stop for fantastic local seafood at Flying Fish Grill or a farm -to -table meal at Pasta Moon. (For a pub -style option, try the historic San Benito House.) On Main Street, stop by Barterra winery for wine tasting and chocolate. And speaking of chocolate, you do not want to miss Sweet 55, a Swiss chocolate confectionery. More options: outdoor dining and music with a view at the Half Moon Bay Brewing Company or Sam's Chowder House or exquisite Peruvian food right on the water at La Costanera. Another not -to -be -missed spot is Moss Beach Distillery, complete with a resident ghost. You'll want to definitely hike Devil's Slide in Pacifica, a spectacular paved hike along the cliff overlooking the Pacific. Feeling ambitious? Try the Portola Dis- covery Hike, celebrating the discovery of San Francisco Bay 250 years ago. Fun stops in Pacifica include A Grape in the Fog wine bar, the iconic Nick's Seafood Restaurant and Pedro Point Brewing Company. Nick's and A Grape in the Fog feature regular entertainment. For more information visitsanmateocountycom. AGENDA ITEM NO: 8e 132 BURL INGAME STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 From: Kevin Gardiner, Community Development Director — (650) 558-7253 Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager — (650) 558-7256 Subject Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendments to Professional Services Agreements to Extend the Term of Agreement for Various Consulting Firms RECOMMENDATION The City Council is asked to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute amendments to the Agreements for Professional Services of various consulting firms to extend the terms of the Agreements. BACKGROUND The City has entered into Agreements for Professional Services with several firms to perform a variety of services for the Planning Department, including environmental review services, feasibility studies, planning services for review of development applications, and consulting services for administration of the affordable housing program and General Plan and Zoning Updates. The City of Burlingame recently updated its financial management system (Tyler MUNIS). One of its functions is to manage professional services agreements for each City division. During the process of updating the financial system, the Planning Division became aware that several agreements had expired. A list of the expired agreements is attached. The list provides the firm name, associated project, proposed extension date, and contract amount. There are no changes proposed to the "not to exceed amount" in the agreements at this time. DISCUSSION As noted above, it was recently brought to the Planning Division's attention that several professional services agreements had expired. Although the terms of these agreements lapsed, work continued to be completed, and payments were made accordingly. In some cases, it was determined that additional work was required to provide additional information, and the Consultant prepared a Contract amendment outlining the additional work required; however, the term was not updated at that time. In order to ratify the payments and update the agreements, the terms of these Agreements need to be extended. The proposed extension dates for each agreement are attached. 1 Amendments to Professional Services Agreements November 4, 2019 The Planning Division is requesting that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute amendments to the Professional Services Agreements of various consulting firms to extend the terms of the Agreements. A sample amended professional services agreement is attached. FISCAL IMPACT Since the amendments are related to the expiration dates of the agreements, but not to the amounts or other terms, there will be no fiscal impact to the City's budget. Exhibits: • Resolution • List of Expired Professional Service Agreements • Sample Amendment to Agreement 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO EXTEND THE TERM OF AGREEMENT FOR VARIOUS CONSULTING FIRMS WHEREAS, the Community Development Department — Planning Division entered into Agreements for Professional Services with several firms to perform a variety of services, including environmental review services, feasibility studies, planning services for review of development applications, and consulting services for administration of the affordable housing program and General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the City has determined in some cases that additional work was required to provide additional information, and the Consultant prepared a Contract amendment outlining the additional work required; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that additional time was required to provide the additional work extending the term of the Agreements; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame recently updated its financial management system, and during the process of updating the system, the Planning Division was made aware that several agreements had expired; and WHEREAS, because the terms of these agreements lapsed, but work continued to be completed and payments made accordingly, the terms of these Professional Services Agreements need to be extended in order to ratify the payments and update the Agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED: The City Council ratifies payments made to the vendors listed in Exhibit A to this Resolution between lapse of their respective contracts and the date of this action. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute amendments to the Professional Services Agreements of various consulting firms to extend the terms of the Agreements as noted in Exhibit A. 3. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the City Manager upon execution of the Professional Services Agreement amendments. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the 41" day of November, 2019, and as adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2 Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk Consultant David. J. Powers & Associates, Inc. David. J. Powers & Associates, Inc. Environmental Science Associates ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Metropolitan Plannng Group Metropolitan Plannng Group Nyanda & Associates, LLC Planning Division Professional Services Contracts Peninsula Wellness Community 556 EI Camino Real 1300 Bayshore Highway 1499 Bayshore Highway The Village at Burlingame Feasibility Study - Lots F & N 1499 Bayshore Highway (Planning Consultant) 1300 Bayshore Highway (Planning Consultant) BMR Program Administration Extended Date Contract Amount (includes augment 12/31/2022 $197,990.00 12/31/2020 $66,382.00 12/31/2020 $156,803.00 12/31/2019 $134,080.00 12/31/2019 $161,354.00 12/31/2019 $15,000.00 12/31/2019 $20,329.75 12/31/2020 $38,376.00 12/31/2020 $30,450.00 Exhibit A AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND (FIRM NAME) FOR (DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES) RELATED TO (PROJECT DESCRIPTION) THIS AMENDMENT is by and between (firm name) ("Consultant"), engaged in providing (description of services) related to (project/services description), and the City of Burlingame, a public body of the State of California ("City"), amends the Agreement between the parties dated (date of original agreement), hereinafter called the "Agreement". RECITALS WHEREAS, the City has determined that additional work and time is required to complete the (description of services) of the (project/service description) and has requested that the Consultant perform additional services beyond the scope of the Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Paragraph of the Agreement is amended to provide that the Agreement terminates on (date of extension), unless otherwise extended or terminated pursuant to the provisions in the Agreement. 2. Except as expressly amended in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Payment of sums by the City between the original termination date and the amended date are deemed to have been pursuant to the Agreement and governed by its terms, including those relating to indemnification and insurance. Amendment to Agreement for Professional Services between (firm name) and the City of Burlingame IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant and City execute this Amendment to the Agreement. CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 IN Date: Attest: Lisa Goldman City Manager Meaghan Hassel -Shearer City Clerk Approved as to form: Kathleen Kane City Attorney Attachment: Certificate of Liability Insurance 2 CONSULTANT (name) (address) LOW (Firm Principal) Date: Federal Employer ID Number: To: Date From: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: 8f MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Tentative and Final Parcel Map (PM 19-02), Lot Merger of Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as Described in Grant Deed Volume 5902 at Page 111 in San Mateo County Records, Located at 1350 Bayshore Highway RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the tentative and final parcel map (PM 19-02) for the lot merger of parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as described in grant deed volume 5902 at page 111, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for the lot combination must be filed by the applicant within the two-year time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 2. All property corners shall be set in the field and be shown on the map. 3. The final map shall show the widths of the right-of-way for Bayshore Highway and Burlway Road, including the centerlines of right-of-way, bearings, and distances of centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway. BACKGROUND The City was requested to issue a Certificate of Compliance for the above-mentioned property. During the review process, it was discovered that the parcels within the property were not officially merged into one parcel. In order to issue the Certificate of Compliance, the City required the parcels within the property to be formally merged into one parcel. Staff has reviewed the map and recommends its approval in order to comply with the Subdivision Map Act and to create a conforming parcel. No construction work is being proposed on the property as part of this approval. Exhibits: • Resolution • Final Parcel Map 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP (PM 19-02), LOT MERGER OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5 AS DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED VOLUME 5902 AT PAGE 111 IN SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS, LOCATED AT 1350 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY The City Council of the City of Burlingame resolves as follows: WHEREAS, City staff recommends City Council approve the parcel map with the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for the lot combination must be filed by the applicant within the two- year time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 2. All property corners shall be set in the field and be shown on the map. 3. The final map shall show the widths of the right-of-way for Bayshore Highway and Burlway Road, including the centerlines of right-of-way, bearings, and distances of centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE COUNCIL, AS FOLLOWS: The Final Parcel Map (PM 19-02) with the conditions described above is approved. 2. Staff is directed to verify that all conditions of approval are met and arrange for the recording of the tentative and final parcel map. Donna Colson, Mayor I, MEAGHAN HASSEL-SHEARER, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4'" day of November, 2019, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk OWNER'S STATEMENT: THE UMERSRIED HEREBY STATES THAT 'K AM THE CRIER OF THE LAND DELDEIND AND EMBRACED NTHIN WE EXTEROR BOUNDARY LINES ON THE HETEIN EMDDED MAP ENTITLED PARCEL MAP = _', THAT SAID TINTER CONSENTS TO WE PREPARATION AND ROUND OF THIS NAP. NIS MAP SHOWS ALL THE EASEMENTS ON WE PREMISES. OR OF RECORD. BY: MICHAEL N. SCUTRO. KS RIBA DAZE: I1S OWNER'S STATEMENT: STATE OF CAUFOINIA COUNTY OF ON 20— BEFORE OLE. A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASS OF SATISFACTORY EMINENCE W BE WE PER5ON(5) AMSE NAME(S) S/ARE SUBSCRIBED TD WE NTHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKMALEDOFD M ME WAY HE/SHE/WEY EXECUTED WE SAME N HS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPAOTY(IES). AND THAT BY H6/HER/THDR SOIATURE(5) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S). OR THE EN11TY UPON BEHALF OF MARCH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSMUENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERANY OMER WE "" OF THE STALE OF CAUFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH 15 WOE AND CORRECT. MINERS MY HAND. SIGNATURE: PRNTD NAME COMMISSION LIMBER: COMMISSION EXPIRES PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSNE55: COUNTY COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT FRED THIS _DAT OF _ 2D— AT _ ---K N VOLWE _OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE AT REQUEST OF REPUBLIC MAYORAL M. HIE NO, FEE_ MARX CHHURCH. SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDER BY: DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER JOB N0. IBD542 A RN NAIwAco NY f� SITE a YROIT 0.MLYY0 VICINITY MAP SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR OMER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE NTH WE REQUIREMENTS OF WE SUBDIVISON MAP ACT AM LOCK ORDINANCE AT WE RECUEST OF IP WDODSTOCK ONE BAY. LLC, N AUGUST 2013.1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR COMDTIONALLY APPROMD TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. THAT THE SURVEY IS ME AM MAREN AS SHORN: WAY ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF WE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY WE POSITIONS WRACATD,. THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFlOENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. MICHAEL W. SCI -IM. PLS NR EDN LICENSE EMPIRES MARCH 31, 2020 DAZE: CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STALE NAT I HAVE EXAMINED WE HEREON SUBDIVISION MAP AND 1 AM SATSHED THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATE: MARK A. IELWN, PLS No. TOMB CITY OF BURLNGAME, CALIFORNIA LICENSE EXPIRES 12-31-2020 CITY ENGFREER'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE WAY I HAW EXAMINED WE HEREON PARCEL MAP. THAT THE SUWMSION AS SCWH HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY WE SANE AS IT APPEARED ON WE TENTATIVE MAP. IF ANY. AND ANY APPROVED ALMRATICNS THEREOF. THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. AS AMEMEO. AND OF ANY LOCAL ORDNANCE APPUCADU AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF WE TENTATIVE MAP. IF ROOMING. HAVE BEEN COUPLED NM DAT. ART MORIMOTO, RCE/ 426M CITY OF BURUNGANE, CAUFDRNIA PARCEL MAP SITUATED N THE CITY OF BURLINGAME. N WE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING ALL THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED AS PARCELS ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR AND FIVE IN GRANT DEED 5802 AT PACE 111, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY. CTTY OF BURLINGAME - SAN MATEO COUNTY - CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2019 R PVBLIC 1� TIOA �\ Itl HOMES MAA LC GF . RWUA 327» HNA (—I �nrm wuAnSnsxLwMwAruw.'[T • ru IST er-Arai CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT: L LEOHAN HASSEL–SHEAROI. CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF BMUNDAME. STALE OF CALIFORNIA D) HEREBY STALE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF WE CITY OF BKRINCAME AT ITS REGULAR METING HELD ON [DAY MONTH, YEARI OULY APPROVTD THE NOUN MAP ENTITLED -(MAP "MET. DA D,. MEC14M HASSEL–SHEARER CITY CIERK CITY OF BIRNNCAME. CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT: 1 HENRY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP. CONSISTING OF TRI SHEETS. WAS APPROVED BY THE OTY GONDOL OF THE CITY OF BURUNGAME. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY RESOLUTION NO. AT A DULY AUTHORIZED MEE TIM OF SAO CITY COUNCIL HELD ON THE DAY DP —2Q— . AND THAT BY SAID RESOWTON ALL STREETS AND PORTIONS THEREOF. AND ALL EASEMENTS MOM ON SAID MAP AND OFFERED FOR DEDICATION. LIRE REXCRO ON BEHALF O WE PUBLIC. SAVE AM EXCEPT NONE. AND M WE UNITED EXTENT NAT ANY OFFERS FOR EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY PURPOSES ALONG OR BENEATH SAID STREET RIGHTS–OF–WAYS THEN AS TO SUCH EIPRE55 OR IMPLIED OFFERS OF EASEMENTS FOR MBUC MRPOSES WE SAME ARE ACCEPTD, BY. MECHAN HASSEL–SHEARER, CITY CLERK DEPUTY CITY OF BURLNGAME. CALIFORNIA DAZE: NOTES: 1) 06TANI5 AND OeMEx9WS ARE vIOYAH IN FEEY AND OEaMALS MEREa. 2) DEEDS AND SURVEYS TNAT CONTAIN GRID aSTANCES NAYS BEEN COMVERTED TO MOUND DISTANCES BY —PLYING ALL GRID DISTANCES BY A SCALL — 0' 1-72. 3) INE DISTINCDVE BORDER UNE DENOTES 1HE BOUNDARY I THE SUBDIMSON. 'Wos yv sAM .mp0�'�N+ w • ..m c6 �Ay v Pw �'Nu A>ia uM`y w � yrAR tt_ta v� ea vVlF PARCEL MAP SITUATED IN THE aw OF BURIINGAME. IN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING ALL THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED AS PARCELS ONE. TV10, THREE. POUR AND FIVE IN GRANT DEED 5902 AT PACE 111, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY. CITY OF BURLINGAME - SAN MATEO COUNTY - CALIFORNIA SCALE 1"=100' OCTOBER 2019 REPUBLIC MATicNAL LEGEND: O SET NAN • 1' BRASS TAG IS NMA • POUND IINEET MONUMENT AS NOTED • EW ND CORNER AS NOTED 50. R. SHARE FEET MOL YIOME M PAGE () MEASURED U.O. UNRNOMN ORION U () ECORD DATA ShK SEA— POR NOT fDIMD V0. vOU ME G PA. RDOCUMENT No. 2016-053116 RI PARCEL MAP 59 P.N. IT R2PARCEL MAP BS P.M. 50 B3RC PAEL MAP I2-0I0D P.M. 55 PECORO I SURVEY YOIUME 6 MAPS PAGE 76 (CKUNE DOCUMENT No. 2006-01.25 RECORD I SURVEY MOLL. 60.— PACE 39 III RECORD I SURVEY VOLUME 14 MAPS PAGE 1N RB RECORD OF SURVEY VIUYE 10 MAPS PAGE N PARCEL BOUNDARY UNE EA ONTTEUNE — — ADJDIMNG PROPERTY LINE BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINES N 2"r2r M ARE BASED ON THE CENTER LINE OP OLD NY SHORE HHRHYMY AS SHORN ON KHAT CERTAIN PARCR MAP REMINDED N YIUNE 69. PACE 1E SAN MATED E-1 RECORDS Wt om I"r'Iw°N— (rte LEGEND: O SET NAN • 1' BRASS TAG IS NMA • POUND IINEET MONUMENT AS NOTED • EW ND CORNER AS NOTED 50. R. SHARE FEET MOL YIOME M PAGE () MEASURED U.O. UNRNOMN ORION U () ECORD DATA ShK SEA— POR NOT fDIMD V0. vOU ME G PA. RDOCUMENT No. 2016-053116 RI PARCEL MAP 59 P.N. IT R2PARCEL MAP BS P.M. 50 B3RC PAEL MAP I2-0I0D P.M. 55 PECORO I SURVEY YOIUME 6 MAPS PAGE 76 (CKUNE DOCUMENT No. 2006-01.25 RECORD I SURVEY MOLL. 60.— PACE 39 III RECORD I SURVEY VOLUME 14 MAPS PAGE 1N RB RECORD OF SURVEY VIUYE 10 MAPS PAGE N PARCEL BOUNDARY UNE EA ONTTEUNE — — ADJDIMNG PROPERTY LINE BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINES N 2"r2r M ARE BASED ON THE CENTER LINE OP OLD NY SHORE HHRHYMY AS SHORN ON KHAT CERTAIN PARCR MAP REMINDED N YIUNE 69. PACE 1E SAN MATED E-1 RECORDS To Date From: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: 8g MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Tentative and Final Parcel Map (PM 19-03), Lot Merger of Lots 8, 9, 14, 15, and Portion of Lot 7, Block 10, Map of Polo Field Subdivision at City Parking Lot N Located at 160 Lorton Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the tentative and final parcel map (PM 19-03) for the lot merger of Lots 8, 9, 14, 15, and portion of Lot 7, Block 10, Map of Polo Field Subdivision at City Parking Lot N, subject to the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for the lot combination must be filed by the applicant within the two-year time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 2. All property corners shall be set in the field and be shown on the map. 3. The final map shall show the widths of the right-of-way for Lorton Avenue, Highland Avenue, and Howard Avenue, including the centerlines of right-of-way, bearings, distances of centerline, and any existing monuments in the roadway. 4. All frontage sidewalks, driveways, and curb and gutter within in the public right-of-way shall be replaced with new improvements. 5. No raised structures shall be constructed in the public right-of-way. BACKGROUND This map action is part of the new affordable housing development at Village at Burlingame, which involves the construction of a new five -story parking structure at City Parking Lot N. On December 10, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the tentative parcel map. Staff has reviewed the map and recommends its approval subject to the above conditions. Exhibits: • Resolution • Final Parcel Map • December 10, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP (PM 19-03), LOT MERGER OF LOTS 8, 9, 14, 15, AND PORTION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 10, MAP OF POLO FIELD SUBDIVISION AT CITY PARKING LOT N, LOCATED AT 160 LORTON AVENUE The City Council of the City of Burlingame resolves as follows: WHEREAS, City staff recommends City Council approve the parcel map with the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for the lot combination must be filed by the applicant within the two-year time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 2. All property corners shall be set in the field and be shown on the map. 3. The final map shall show the widths of the right-of-way for Lorton Avenue, Highland Avenue, and Howard Avenue, including the centerlines of right-of-way, bearings, distances of centerline, and any existing monuments in the roadway. 4. All frontage sidewalks, driveways, and curb and gutter within in the public right-of-way shall be replaced with new improvements. 5. No raised structures shall be constructed in the public right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE COUNCIL, AS FOLLOWS: The Final Parcel Map (PM 19-03) with the conditions described above is approved. 2. Staff is directed to verify that all conditions of approval are met and arrange for the recording of the tentative and final parcel map. Donna Colson, Mayor I, MEAGHAN HASSEL-SHEARER, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4 1 day of November, 2019, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk faFN1 Na W E TAWS NO � FOR M E YEW W17 -MIC A all X01 W, CUE w IMMHF. ® M REX a AARf1pIK 1.923, 9 xlF. A$'® RIIBMF W ODl1D1 Y' (CU ENONG WITH 3 n a M FN20Wu aWMIE WO TAW,TMN LOa. 4D Rgll$ a FWrE3 x �w M EeIpWN wTlDa NFEW rwcr e m Rrns a M here x ro W MI mRmA a M RNa LMMG •m,x xrc ROW SOEFT, IDEA' OR X46XN. MA W M NINB.L a An ,OUR a 1111£ WeN/YY. M Fasun Wu R[aWE: ® rlx NLsan W M olr a BIWREANC N e1 NwN A uw CU M NFFIIIIION N0xw0a M COXIFNNAIW 1R4l4LTI0X AEN OES'IXN1MG M110R aFNYlS 9NL wAE M RorD ro o2iv1E w ENNr a M a1r a BUWINY6E VICINITY MAP NO S E DEVELOPMENT NOTES: J PARCEL MAP 001 PARCEL MAP #____ PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE w LATS B. 9, 14, 15, AND A PORTION OF LOT ®mIIXm/vFrT 7 OF BLOCK 10 AS SHOWN ON THE YAP s fi i» ENTITLED: "YAP OF POLO FIELD SUBDIVISION O1 p EIS MAY 1, 1905 IN YAP BOOK "E", PAGE 45, $C SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS. ® EEIQ • CLTY OF BURLINGAME 4 SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. i 1 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA ® MARCH 7, 2019 SCAIE: 1"=20' w GENERAL NOTES c OWNER BURUNGAME PACIFIC ASSOCKTES, CA IP wDIA 430 E STATE STREET. SNIT 100 O EAGLE. O 87616 W (206) 908-4873 Y DEVELOPER: BURLNGAME PACIFIC ASSOCIATES, CA IP 99 O EAGLE. O 81616 SOWN 1107 HOWARD AVE �•• i 4d 2290 DIAMOND BLVD., SUITE 100 9 CONCORD, CMIFORNA 94520 Ss (925) 685-4569 HOWARD APN: 029-231-240, 029-231-060 39x SITE ADDRESS. 160 LORTON AVE, BURUNGAME CA ® SITE AREA: 0.8 ACRES SIG EIOSING ZONING: R-4 PROPOSED ZONING: R-4 N EXISTING USE: PAAIONG LOT AVE PROPOSED USE PARKING PARAS w SEAYICE: WATER — CITY OF BURUNGAME m SEWER — CITY OF BURINGAME GAS & ELECTRIC — PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CD. o TELEPHONE — AT&T FLOODING: ZONE X THIS AREA IS SUBJECT TO 02% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FIAOOING PER FIRM PANELS 06MIC 0153E DATED 10/16/12 CF AND MOTTO 0154F DATED 07/16/2018 TOPOGPMIIY: TOPOGRIPNY PER FIELD SURVEY BY BELECCI & AS.SOCNTM INC., 04/21/16. BOUNDNO': BOIINORY BASED ON FIELD SURVEY An NMT ONE 10 i 0,tT6EA0 OECNC U E .. 9MMN 93OR ONE .: _. _.. 9a•DAr ONE HOWARD t, • ( •, i i s D `. 3 ` 4 • O : r i D D t W i p1 1 tD 1 D01 24 E DD ; ]01 2) : YD •, Dt : D2 21 L(( 14 A +i APN 029-231-060.' APIN 029-231 240 i P c M ,+ ... .D e'r ,4; aa{<, : t 'w;\ Q Y A P g p O5p9g ' f ms 7W¢ 1 1 5 • Ka7 i• • � u > M � — � •.�. ;� ,�, ` `, •,. APN. 029 231240 i� J Y ��rl wW2930 E :60.00 _....f S USI d1 mv MORTON T 1 6 T 5 . AVE LOREON N 29 I . O 7 � o Blob 10 POLO FIELD SUBD 3 M 54 DEVELOPMENT NOTES: J 2D 10 D 20 40 60 SCNE IN FEET 1. THE RREOSE OF THIS TENTATIVE MAP 5 TO KIM ALL LOIS NO ONE LOT. TO FACILITATE (DEVELOPMENT OF THE BULNOMIE LOT N PARKING GARAGE 2. NO TREES ONSITE MILL BE PRESERVED. TWO TREE AM LORTON AYE WILL BE PRESERVED, WITH A THING TREE BEING REMOVED 3. SIOEW&I6, CURB & OATIENS, PLYRDRS. AND DRN MAYS WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ALONG LORTON AND HIGHLAND AVENUES BASIS O BEARINGS M BEARINGS OF THIS S ARE SMED ON M ONE BETWEEN fwNO CTT L&ESES ON M CONCRETE WNW OF XOWVU AVENUE AS SHOWN ON WACFL WP 61 PN n BEN•a 7N a wn'W'E LEGEND 0 PARCEL MAP 001 PARCEL MAP #____ PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE w LATS B. 9, 14, 15, AND A PORTION OF LOT ®mIIXm/vFrT 7 OF BLOCK 10 AS SHOWN ON THE YAP C ENTITLED: "YAP OF POLO FIELD SUBDIVISION O1 OF PART OF TOWN OF BURLINGAME", FILED EIS MAY 1, 1905 IN YAP BOOK "E", PAGE 45, $C SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS. ® EEIQ • CLTY OF BURLINGAME 4 SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. V CONCORD, CALIFORNIA ® MARCH 7, 2019 SCAIE: 1"=20' w GENERAL NOTES c OWNER BURUNGAME PACIFIC ASSOCKTES, CA IP wDIA 430 E STATE STREET. SNIT 100 O EAGLE. O 87616 W (206) 908-4873 Y DEVELOPER: BURLNGAME PACIFIC ASSOCIATES, CA IP 430 E STATE STREET. SATE 100 O EAGLE. O 81616 SOWN (208) 908-4873 ENGINEER: BCCI & ASSOCIATE, INC. 9 9. 2290 DIAMOND BLVD., SUITE 100 9 CONCORD, CMIFORNA 94520 Ss (925) 685-4569 $ APN: 029-231-240, 029-231-060 39x SITE ADDRESS. 160 LORTON AVE, BURUNGAME CA ® SITE AREA: 0.8 ACRES SIG EIOSING ZONING: R-4 PROPOSED ZONING: R-4 N EXISTING USE: PAAIONG LOT ® PROPOSED USE PARKING PARAS w SEAYICE: WATER — CITY OF BURUNGAME m SEWER — CITY OF BURINGAME GAS & ELECTRIC — PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CD. o TELEPHONE — AT&T FLOODING: ZONE X THIS AREA IS SUBJECT TO 02% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FIAOOING PER FIRM PANELS 06MIC 0153E DATED 10/16/12 CF AND MOTTO 0154F DATED 07/16/2018 TOPOGPMIIY: TOPOGRIPNY PER FIELD SURVEY BY BELECCI & AS.SOCNTM INC., 04/21/16. BOUNDNO': BOIINORY BASED ON FIELD SURVEY 2D 10 D 20 40 60 SCNE IN FEET 1. THE RREOSE OF THIS TENTATIVE MAP 5 TO KIM ALL LOIS NO ONE LOT. TO FACILITATE (DEVELOPMENT OF THE BULNOMIE LOT N PARKING GARAGE 2. NO TREES ONSITE MILL BE PRESERVED. TWO TREE AM LORTON AYE WILL BE PRESERVED, WITH A THING TREE BEING REMOVED 3. SIOEW&I6, CURB & OATIENS, PLYRDRS. AND DRN MAYS WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ALONG LORTON AND HIGHLAND AVENUES BASIS O BEARINGS M BEARINGS OF THIS S ARE SMED ON M ONE BETWEEN fwNO CTT L&ESES ON M CONCRETE WNW OF XOWVU AVENUE AS SHOWN ON WACFL WP 61 PN n BEN•a 7N a wn'W'E LEGEND 0 Wa910• NENanWx 001 XDE w uTd 69v, ®mIIXm/vFrT Glw 69WOR C wuwE NET O1 EISIWC BON EIS ALICE $C f12 XIDWDRT ML EEIQ • Iw10 9oAAart n JOxE SUES w5M V half NM ® w5 NOf1T R w WNe[ c arc Nnax wDIA WE u O EN P W =AM 9 IMAM Y Ow XW/P IM AYR2C snNl tlell CNAX OIEF O UNR NNIT PaE SOWN SICK pWX YW HOLE UGIa ROI£ 9 9. slmwxff qR 9 wDN WCxasc WEu Ss v1NNrc sklw $ 9NENN 9]e [tEW M 39x YMNn SFWW WMdF ® SNRNN RYEP IVINIGIf SIG UVILMY Sal N um MLM ® B mN aur Nwu[ w m Bal JUN'; �� o ODER NEV W1TIR IElfll wile MLI[ CF IMNAW E£ PaRRTUNCRE An NMT ONE 0,tT6EA0 OECNC U E 9MMN 93OR ONE .: _. _.. 9a•DAr ONE Monday, December 10, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Staff in attendance: Community Development Director Kevin Gardiner, Planning Manager Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner Catherine Keylon and City Attorney Kathleen Kane. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioner Gaul arrived at 7:09 p.m. Present 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There were no minutes to approve. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA > Item 8a - Consideration of an Ordinance Adopting Residential Impact Fees for New Residential Development has been continued to the January 14, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA There were no public comments on non -agenda items. 6. STUDY ITEMS a. 1101 Rosedale Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Special Permit and Parking Variance for reduction of off-street parking on site. (Martin Miller, applicant, property owner, and designer) (91 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1101 Rosedale Ave - Staff Report 1101 Rosedale Ave - Attachments 1101 Rosedale Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. > If we were to consider a Variance for parking within the front setback, would that then eliminate the need for the Variance for parking being requested? (Hurin: Yes, it would eliminate the Variance for not providing the number of parking spaces required.) > The applicant is not applying for a Variance to legalize the parking within the front setback, correct? (Hurin: That is correct. The proposed application includes adding a planter strip along the edge of that City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 311212019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 parking space to prevent someone from parking there.) Acting Chair Comaroto opened the public hearing. Martin Miller, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: There were no questions from the Commission. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Acting Chair Comaroto closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion.: > See no issues with the Special Permit to reduce the number of parking spaces on-site. This is a unique lot and this is a reasonable way to use the space and provide full enjoyment of the property. > Not meeting the minimum parking requirement is difficult to support. See the downside of using the alternate parking space in the front setback, however think the benefit to the community outweighs that. Therefore, would be in support of having the applicant return with a Variance for parking within the front setback rather than providing just one parking space on-site. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar with the direction to the applicant to change the Variance application from reducing the parking on-site to providing a parking space in the front setback not leading to a garage or carport. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Terrones, and Tse Absent: 1 - Gaul 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Terrones was recused from Item 7e - 1025 and 1029 Capuchino Avenue, as he lives within 500 feet of the subject properties. a. Adopt Planning Commission Calendar for 2019 — Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 2019 Planning Commission Memorandum 2019 Planning Commission Schedule 2019 City Council Calendar - Draft b. 1304 Mills Avenue, zoned R-1- Application for One Year Extension of a previously approved application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Melina Copass, applicant and designer; Matt and Lauren Fleming, property owners) (66 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 7/12/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 Attachments: 1304 Mills Ave - Staff Report & Attachments 1304 Mills Ave - Plans C. 1648 Barroilhet Avenue, zoned R-1- Application for Design Review for a new two-story single family dwelling (existing detached garage to be retained). This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a). (TRG Architects, Randy Grange, applicant and designer; Debbie and William Clifford, property owners) (105 noticed) Staff contact: Sonal Aggarwal Attachments: 1648 Barroilhet Ave - Staff Report 1648 Barroilhet Ave - Attachments 1648 Barroilhet Ave - Historic Resource Evaluation 1648 Barroilhet Ave - Plans d. 1547 Los Altos Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new attached garage. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e) (1). (Studio 797, Jared Kuykendall, architect; Flora Lee and Jonathan Wan, applicant and property owners) ( 73 noticed) Staff contact: Sonal Aggarwal Attachment:: 1547 Los Altos Dr- Staff Report 1547 Los Altos Dr - Attachments 1547 Los Altos Dr - Plans Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to approve Items 7a through 7d on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse e. 1025 and 1029 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-2 - Application for a One Year Extension for a previously approved application for a Conditional Use Permit for re-emerging lots, Design Review and front setback Variances for two new duplex residential units on two separate lots. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (a). (Ed Breur, TRG Architects, applicant and designer; Kurt Steil, property owner) (70 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit Attachments: 1025 and 1029 Caouchino Ave - Staff Report 1025 and 1029 Caouchino Ave - Attachments 1025 and 1029 Caouchino Ave - Plans Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to approve Item 7e on the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, and Tse City o/ Burlingame Page 3 Primed on 311212019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 Recused: 1 - Terrones 8. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS a. Consideration of an Ordinance Adopting Residential Impact Fees for New Residential Development - This item has been continued to the January 14, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting. > Item 8a - Consideration of an Ordinance Adopting Residential Impact Fees for New Residential Development has been continued to the January 14, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting. b. 1245 Cabrillo Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Amendment to Design Review for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling and new detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a). (Eric and Jennifer Lai, applicants and property owners; Chu Design Associates Inc., designer) (113 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1245 Cabrillo Ave - Staff Report 1245 Cabrillo Ave - Attachments 1245 Cabrillo Ave - Plans Commissioner Kelly was recused from this item as he lives within 500 feet of the subject property. All Commissioners had visited the project site. Commissioner Comaroto indicated that she had met with the adjacent neighbor to the south. Commissioner Sargent indicated that he had also met with the adjacent neighbor to the south and the applicant. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. > Understand that the applicant was directed to stop work on the nonconforming wall. Was a stop work order issued for the entire project? (Nunn: The Building Division issued a partial stop work order for the nonconforming wall along the left side of the house; applicant was allowed to work on the remaining portion of the house at their own risk.) > On existing walls that are located within the required setback, how much of the wall can be removed before it needs to conform to current code setback requirements? (Hurin: The foundation and framing needs to be kept; the exterior siding and drywall may be removed.) > It appears that the framing between foundation and lower floor on a portion of a nonconforming wall at the front of the house has been replaced, so is that considered to be a wall replacement and therefore subject to current code requirements? (Hurin: Planning and Building Division staff would need to review the details of what has been replaced in order to determine if it is considered to be a new wall.) James Chu, represented the applicant, along with Eric Lai, property owner. Commission Questions/Comments., > You are proposing to comply with the required side setback of four feet along the left side property line and to maintain the existing plate height by changing the roof pitch to accommodate the narrower house width, correct? (Chu: Correct.) > The cripple wall along the living room at the front of the house has been replaced. The floor framing in this area is rotted as well and the window header will need to be replaced. It appears that most of the living room wall will need to be replaced. (Chu: The original purpose of preserving the existing wall was to City of Burlingame Page 4 Printed on 3112/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 retain the existing nonconforming front setback, could reframe the wall to make the house better.) > Who is maintaining responsible control over the work site and its current condition? (Chu: The contractor is the person responsible over the work site. Designer has not been hired to oversee the project during construction.) Is the contractor present tonight? (Chu., No.) > Would like to note that there are several conditions of approval that require milestones to be verified both by the surveyor and architect, so there are multiple people involved. > At various points during construction, certain verifications are required. Concerned that property owners don't do this for a living, so they are at the mercy of the contractor and professionals completing the construction. Concerned that the contractor has made a gaffe like this and still expected that they will maintain control. (Chu: One of the conditions of approval includes that prior to the framing inspection, a professional needs to inspect the construction to make sure that the architectural elements are built according to the approved plan and that the project is in compliance with FAR. In this case, everything happened during the demolition stage, prior to requiring any sort of verification.) > Moving forward, what gives us the confidence that whatever gets approved will be built? Not feeling confident about that right now. (Chu: Contractor is a local developer who has lived in Burlingame for many years and has built several new homes in Burlingame. However, he may not have had experience with a remodedadditton project as detailed as this, requiring existing nonconforming walls to be retained.) > Is contractor licensed? (Chu: Yes.) (Lai., Asked contractor to attend the meeting tonight, but he did not come.) > When originally approved project, quite a bit of the house was going to remain. There were a lot of pre-existing conditions, including the setbacks and plate heights which were in place but not being specifically reviewed. Can't see us approving a nearly 10 -foot plate height on a raised floor. Have you looked at lowering the plate height to 9 feet? (Chu: Yes, we can consider doing that if it would help us get an approval.) > On the proposed Left Elevation, there is a window well towards the rear of the house with a shoulder on the Rear Elevation, so it may force the end window in a bit. Shoulder on long, tall gable along left side will be fine because it will help dormers settle into the roof. But will be limited with gabled dormer towards the front of the house along the left side with how much roof you have cutting into just below the sill. May want to think about reducing the height of the windows, making them smaller, so you have enough roof to cut into the bottom dormer and bring up the bottom edge up a bit. (Chu: Yes, will consider doing that.) > Did you see letter from Sally Brown and Philip Ross regarding stabilizing the creek at the rear of the lot for construction of the garage? (Chu: Yes, we made some changes to the foundation of the garage, instead of a spread footing will be using a pier and grade beam foundation to disturb less of the soil in the area. There is also erosion control in place.) > Will there be a soils report submitted? Who would validate the stabilization of the creek? (Lai: Hired Precision Engineering to prepare the soils report.) (Hurin: The Engineering Division is reviewing this issue and will contact the applicant if any additional measures are required.) Public Comments. Frank and Robin Knifsend, 1243 Cabrillo Avenue: Appreciate modifications made, but the changes are small and dont directly address key concerns about the massing and scale of the project. From our view the house is massive and is built to the maximum allowed criteria. One of the biggest issues we have is that we dont trust the plans, there are many inconsistencies. The path they took to get to this point was making misleading statements directly to us, as well as in the planning process, about keeping the existing structure. 85% or more of the existing structure is gone and down to the subtioor, that's a pretty big accident that took place over several weeks. There are a lot of call -outs on the plans and labeled existing on the proposed structure, and would contend that not one element on the back 80% of the house is to the original existing floor heights, ceiling heights, and plate heights. On proposed building elevations, indicated plate height lines don't match to what is drawn. Took them at their word, see the proposed plans with many references to existing conditions, used the existing structure as a story board for the plans that they were going to build. Now see what has actually been framed, measured wall myself and determined that it was built one foot taller than approved. Concerned with what the plans do and don't shown, questionable communication from the applicant and what the contractor has done up to this point. Don't City of Burlingame Page 5 Printed on 311212019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 have a lot of confidence going forward that we're not going have this massive structure next to us. Gene Bordegaray, neighbor across the street: Realize there have been some mitigations measures to try to get the project back into conformance. However, in looking at the proposed plan, the massing of the wall adjacent to the left side neighbor is huge, measuring 25 feet tall and 50 feet long and only 4 feet away from the fence. Can't really appreciate how that will look because there is nothing to show us that right now. Suggest installing story poles and netting to show massing along left side property line to give a better sense of how intrusive that wall will be from their side of the property line. Bill Howell, 1424 Benito Avenue: When we remodeled house, our contractor made us stick to the rules. This is an intimidating process, but there is a fundamental trust that when plans are approved, one expects that the house will be built as shown on the approved plans; most people abide by that rule. Was at neighbor's house and saw the wall near the fence, doesn't feel natural because it's so high relative to the driveway. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing Commission Discussion: > Glad to be reviewing these revisions and not the revisions previously proposed. Also glad to see that the intent is to comply with the side setback. > What is before us now is simply an amendment to design review. However, there some revisions that could possibly occur, but also additional information needs to be shown and corrected on the plans so that we know what we're approving. > Moving forward, as standard procedure there will need to be certification of the framing provided by a professional confirming that what has been built is consistent with the approved plans. > House is approximately 5 feet above adjacent grade and is similar to other houses nearby. Houses to the right and left are elevated above grade. So project would benefit from reducing the plate height to 9 feet. > Would like to see exactly what plate height we are being asked to consider for the dormers on the second floor, because we have an indication on the drawings that say 8'4" but it says "existing top plate" however if that top plate no longer exists it doesn't matter. Need to clarity plate of dormers on second floor, needs to be corrected and made accurate so that everyone knows what were are reviewing and approving as the project moves forward. > Not prepared at this point to move forward with an approval, but am accepting of the general intent of the changes proposed along the left side of the house to bring it into compliance with setback requirements. > Concerned with the way the dormers are treated on the second floor along left side in that it creates another tall, flat surface; caused by window wells to make windows taller. Suggest that the roof slope run up to hit the wall and windows be made smaller. It would appear to be a much smaller wall if the vertical surface stopped at a certain point, the roof sloped away, and the windows were in a small wall that was pushed way back on the roof. As proposed, the window wells that are cut out are exposing a tall wall on top of another tall wall. Dormers along left side of house need to be rethought to reduce the apparent height of the wall. > Agree with most comments made. However, not convinced that the design of the dormers need to be rethought if they are in compliance with code requirements. > Provide at least one section to understand what is happening on the second floor. > Correct drafting error for plate height shown at family room, shown at 9'-0" but building elevations still show it at 9'-10". > Nonconforming front wall also needs to be addressed since the required front setback is several feet further back. > Left side elevation is tall and flat, so would like to see some articulation there. > Concerned about front wall; Planning and Building Divisions should review how much has been done to the wall; may need to apply for a Variance to retain it. City or Burlingame Page 6 Printed on 3/12/2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 > Would be helpful to have the contractor frame an 8 foot section of wall with a 9 foot plate height to give the Commission and neighbors a visual of what is being proposed. > Disappointed that this house got this far away from the original house. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to continue the application with the following direction: > Request that staff investigate the front wall and determine whether a variance or change is required. > Reduce plate height to 9 feet. > Provide additional details on the plans as requested during the discussion. > Provide building section through the dormers to provide a clear understanding of the massing in this area. Commission Discussion: > Would like to reiterate concern of apparent height of the dormer wall due to the window wells. It might be fine to cut a section through there, but would like applicant to really consider refining the dormers. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Sargent, Loftis, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse Recused: 1 - Kelly C. 1341 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and Conditional Use Permit for a half -bath in the detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Tim Raduenz, Form + One Design, applicant and designer; Jeff Diana, property owner) (123 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1341 De Soto Ave - Staff Report 1341 De Soto Ave - Attachments 1341 De Soto Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. Commissioner Comaroto indicated that she had met with the applicant. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. > What is the policy for skylights on accessory structures located within 10 feet of property line? (Keylon: A conditional use permit is required for any type of glazing, skylights or windows on an accessory structure within 10 feet of a property line.) > There is no application for a conditional use permit on this project, correct? (Keylon. Correct.) Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Tim Raduenz, project designer, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Is there a skylight proposed in the detached garage? (Raduenz: No, the plans show a pull-down ladder City of Burlingame Page 7 Printed on 3/12/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 to provide access to the attic space in the garage.) Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion. > Really like this project. > Like changes made to the project. > Appreciate applicant speaking to the neighbor regarding providing additional space behind the detached garage. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Loftis, to approve the application. Commission Discussion: > Like the project overall, but would still like to see a deeper front porch. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse Nay: 1 - Sargent d. 1464 Balboa Avenue, zoned R-1- Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Chu Design & Associates, applicant and designer; Matt Nejasmich, property owner) (135 noticed) Staff Contact: Michelle Markiewicz Attachments: 1464 Balboa Ave - Staff Report 1464 Balboa Ave - Attachments 1464 Balboa Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. James Chu, represented the applicant, along with Matt Nejasmich, property owner. Commission Questions/Comments: > Asked applicant to clarify that rendering submitted are correct. (Chu confirmed rendering is correct.) > Plans show a 9'-6" first floor plate height, but it is drawn below the lowest point of the fascia. Please explain. (Chu.' Reason is that when designing a house where the second floor floor wall is set in and not directly above a first floor support wall, a beam is needed to carry the load out to the first floor support wall. In order to avoid too many notches in the beam, the roof rafters are typically set on top of the beam, which explains the extra spacing above the first floor plate.) City of Burlingame Page 8 Printed on 3112/2079 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 > Column bases at front porch look really massive, appear to scale at 24 inches wide. Is that the intended dimension? Plans should be revised if they are intended to be smaller. (Chu. Bases should be 18 inches wide.) > How much exposure will there be on the shingles? Exposure shown on the renderings are much larger than on the building elevations. (Chu., Should be a 4 to 6 -inch exposure.) Please clarify the exposure on the plans. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > This is a good looking project and fits in well with the neighborhood. Commissioner Gaul made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to approve the application. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse e. 1838 EI Camino Real, Suite 180, zoned ECN - Application for Parking Variance to convert an existing office space into a health service use (medical office). This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (a). (Lemi Medical Center, applicant; Nolan Wong, property owner; Jack Tam, Team 7 International, architect) (36 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1838 EI Camino Real Suite 180 - Staff Report 1838 EI Camino Real Suite 180 - Attachments 1838 EI Camino Real Suite 180 - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Dr. Nani Kanen and Ann Strain, represented the applicant. > Understand that the detoxification process is difficult. What is the process for patients to come back for treatment? (Strain: The first day of treatment lasts five to six hours. Patients then come back for three to five days for sessions lasting one-half to one hour, depending on the patient. Patients then continue to do a taper of whatever the detox medications are. Many patients, especially if they are from the local area, will follow up for an in office visit. It's important to have providers that know how to treat this.) (Kann: With the proposed expansion, not all rooms will be used as exam rooms. Current space is too small, have too many work stations in one room, there is no break room for staff and there is no room to draw blood.) > What is your relationship with Peninsula Hospital? Are you employees of the hospital and is this a separate endeavor? (Kann: No, none of us are employees of Peninsula Hospital. I am a contracted medical director. This is a private practice.) > How do patients arrive to the facility? Do they drive themselves or use ride -sharing services? (Kann: Very fortunate to have Caltrain within walking distance of the facility, so many patients use Caltrain. Would Cay of Burlingame Page 9 Printed on 3IMO19 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 point out that patients are not allowed to drive, so patients are also dropped off and picked up by family members.) > Are there often parking spaces that are available? (Kann: Yes, there are available parking spaces in our parking lot.) > Do you have a sense of the percentage of patients that drive to the facility versus how many use other transportation methods? (Strain: Approximately 30% use alternative means of transportation. Would note that the facility is located on EI Camino Real which contains a bus line, Caftrain and BART stations are located nearby, and many patients use ride -sharing services. Staff members walk to the facility ff they live close by.) > Ordinance requires that the off-street parking for health services uses be calculated at one space per 250 square feet. However in nearby zoning districts such as the TW District, health service is calculated using the ratio for office, which is one space per 300 square feet. So there wouldnY be a Variance required in this case if the facility was located in the TW District. What is the reason for not including that parking ratio in this area? (Hurin: When TW District was established, it envisioned large buildings that would provide more on-site parking that therefore absorb the difference in parking ratios. In the ECN zone, high density housing was envisioned, however we understand that many of the existing buildings will continue to be used for medical and office uses.) > That allowance to use the office ratio for health services is for applications in buildings that are 20,000 square feet or greater. In this case, the building area is 19,900 square feet so it's slightly less than 20,000 square feet. See it as another reason to consider that not only are we close to those other zones, but also close to the criteria. Michael Brownrigg: Understand that there is a difficulty with drug addiction in our society. Visited this facility and observed a line stretching out the wailing room door. Am proud that we have a facility like this in Burlingame and that we're helping people that need help. Claudio (last name not provided): Was involved in alcohol and drug addiction, cleaned my life up 25 years ago. Am a productive individual that works, am a general contractor and live in Burlingame. When I became sober, there wasn? a facility around like this one that I could go to. Patients that are serious about cleaning there lives up do tum around and if these facilities aren't available, it makes it difficult for them to do so. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. > This is a necessary facility, whether in Burlingame or in a nearby community. > Like that it is located across the street from the hospital. > Don't see issue with the Parking Variance, drive by this site quite often and have seen this lot empty. Don't think intensification of use will be detrimental because the manner in which patients will be arriving at the facility. > Sad to hear the drug addiction/detox facility at hospital is closing. There are a lot of people in our community that have used that facility and also know that people in our community need help. > Thanked the applicants for their help and hard work. > This is a good application, really needed in the community. > Can support the Variance request. Facility has unique characteristics that limit the parking need. One of the conditions of approval we're being asked to consider includes that if this medical facility ceases to exist, the Parking Variance becomes void. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Loftis, to approve the application. Commission Discussion: > There is a greater abundance of parking in the lot at the rear of the building along California Drive compared to parking on the frontage road along EI Camino Real, so would encourage users and their families to use the parking lot at the rear. cityorauf ingame Page 10 Printed on 317/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse f. 920 Bayswater Avenue (includes 908 Bayswater Ave., 108 Myrtle Rd., 112 Myrtle Rd., 116 Myrtle Rd., 120 Myrtle Rd., 124 Myrtle Rd.) zoned MMU and R-3 - Application for Design Review Amendment for review of window materials for a previously approved application for a New 128 -Unit Apartment Development. (Fore Property Company, applicant; John C. and Donna W. Hower Trust, Julie Baird, Eric G. Ohlund Et Al, Doris J. Mortensen Tr. - property owners; Withee Malcolm Architects LLP, architects) (325 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon Attachments: 920 Bayswater Ave - Staff Report 920 Bayswater Ave - Attachments - #1 920 Bayswater Ave - Attachments - #2 920 Bayswater Ave - Attachments - #3 All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report > Staff report notes that the applicant is currently working with an acoustical engineer to provide information requested by the Planning Commission at the November 26th meeting. Has a report been submitted yet? (Keylon: The applicant will address this question during his presentation.) Mark Pilarozyk, represented the applicant. > There are higher noise levels here than at Summerhill site, correct? (Pilarczyk: That is correct.) In reading the documentation from Summerhill's approval, vinyl windows were approved for that project because they couldn't meet the sound transmission class (STC) ratings any other way. Did you also find that you could not meet the required STC ratings without using a vinyl window? (Pilarczyk: Yes, that is correct. We're ultimately limited to this high end line vinyl project because of the STC ratings.) > Which one of the sample windows provided are you proposing to use now? (Pilarczyk: The Milgard Tuscany Series, however did provide an alternative window as was requested by the Commission.) > Do you know what is STC rating is for the Milgard Tuscany Series? (Pilarczyk: Submittal included the STC ratings from the manufacturer which is attached to the staff report. They could vary and produce different STC ratings depending on the window type.) > Are you still waiting for sound information from the noise consultant, Charles Salter? (Pilarczyk: Yes, waiting for final report. Noise consultant reviewed the information and was ready to provide a report but indicated that based on information in the General Plan and Mitigated Negative Declaration, they were consistent in saying that there were higher decibels because of the proximity to the train tracks and that you need to be at or above the STC ratings at the Summerhill site.) Chair Gaul closed the public hearing > Thanked applicant for additional information, it was helpful to have. Commended applicant for working with the community on this project to ensure that it fits in with the neighborhood. > Have looked at the Milgard Tuscany window or similar windows a lot over the years. Can only remember one project where they have been approved, the Summerhill project, which was because it was the only window they could find that met the STC ratings. And for the specific reason, can support a motion to approve it. > Generally speaking, it doesn4 meet the design review guidelines. Have had lots of applicants come in City of auriingame Page 11 Printed on 311712919 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 with this specific window and we've denied those requests, to the point where the Commission has made applicant remove these windows after they've been installed. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to approve the application with the following condition: > that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project the applicant shall return to the Planning Commission for an FYI with a letter prepared by an acoustical engineer regarding the noise impacts to potential residents of the proposed project and the sound rating required for the windows to meet the Building Code requirements. Commission Discussion: > Thanked the applicant for the additional information provided. Still don't like vinyl windows, but understand that applicant must comply with building code regulations. Happy that you and staff did the research on Summerhill, which we clearly approved for that very reason, which was to meet the STC ratings requirement. > Had suggested a couple of other window manufacturers at the last meeting and reviewed the specifications sheet for those windows. Found that the STC ratings are slightly lower than the proposed window, so assume that it makes a difference. > Also not a fan of vinyl windows, but applicant has changed enough of the other exterior materials to help us find a middle ground. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse g. 150 Park Road (Parking Lot F), zoned HMU & R-4: Application for Design Review, Density Bonus Incentives and Lot Merger for construction of a new 132 -unit affordable workforce and senior apartment development. The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines (Infill Exemption). (Chris Grant, The Pacific Companies, applicant; City of Burlingame, property owner; Pacific West Architecture, architect) (405 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 150 Park Rd (Lot F) - Staff Report 150 Park Rd (Lot F) - Attachments CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption 150 Park Rd (Lot F) - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. > The design of the park element is not under consideration, correct? (Hurin: That's correct. City staff will work with the applicant on the design and may share the proposal with the Parks and Recreation Commission for their input.) Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Caleb Roope, Doug Gibson and Chris Grant, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: City of Burlingame Page 12 Printed on 3112/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 > In looking at your civil plan it looks like they got the flow-through biotreatment. But the swath of coloring encompasses the tree wells where the two existing magnolias and the new magnolia are. In looking at the landscape plan, am 1 correct in understanding that the flow-through biotreatment won't be where the mangolia trees are located? Just want to make sure the magnolia trees will not be damaged. (Gibson: Correct, we would only be doing the flow-through biotreatment where new ground level planting is. The intent would be that we would modify that area for the new planting.) > On sheet A3.1, there is a swath of area outside of the garage identified by a green diagonal hatch. What is that area? Will that be shoring area or that's just outside the limits of your construction? (Gibson: That area primarily would be for service access to the base of the structure.) (Grant: Would also note that at the request of the Fire Marshal, that area was provided wide enough so that there was pedestrian access for fire apparatus.) > Regarding the proposed windows, I don't recall seeing muntins between the glazing when we last reviewed the project. We didn't have that detail provided on the revised plans. Why the munfins between the glazing as opposed to expressed on the exterior and interior, like a simulated true divided lite? (Gibson: The proposed Alside windows meets the price point for the project in order to be economically feasible.) > In past experience we have not accepted the muntins between the glazing, it's just not expressive enough. (Grant: Would the Commission accept a window design that did not include muntins between the glazing much like the submittal in February?) If there was a choice between muntins between the glazing or not, would prefer no muntins. However, dont know if architecture will still work without the muntins. > The issue that I have is that when light hits the windows, the muntins between the glazing look like security bars on the inside of a window. Would be one of the last characteristics that we would want this project to have. It's something we'll need to continue to discuss and perhaps look at other options. > The stucco is true cementitious base stucco, not an EIFS exterior finish, correct? (Gibson: Correct, the intent would be a three -layer stucco). > The lap siding is cementitious Hardie board, correct? (Gibson: Correct.) > Wood is called out for the trellis, that's not a Trex material, correct? (Gibson: Correct, it would be timbered wood provided with proper waterproofing and flashing.) > Is the community space intended to be accessible by the public? (Gibson: It's meant to be used by the residents of the facility, it's not meant to be a space that can be leased out or rented for community events. Not intended to be used as a commercial space as a revenue generator for the property.) > Would the doors leading to the space typically be locked and only unlocked if there was a party or some type of gathering to let people come in from the street? (Roope: It's an amenity for the residents that live there. Lobby will be accessible all of the time, but other parts of the building would be open during the day when the on-site management team is there. Somebody could come in from the outside, but then would meet the manager on site and work with them. > How would one enter this space from the inside of the building? (Roope: There is an access provided through the mail room.) > Transformer and electrical rooms have doors leading from the street is that your intention? Would they be serviced from those doors? (Roope: Yes, those rooms would be locked and serviced that way.) Are they glass doors? (Roope: They are all designed to have a storefront look to be consistent with the architecture of the building; would be designed so that you would not be able to see into the rooms.) > Would the glass doors provide enough security of the equipment? (Roope: Doors would be solid, could work with staff to study that issue further.) > Given that approximately half of the residents will be seniors, was there any thought to having an ADA ramp from the lobby to the first floor? (Roope: Elevator provides access from the lobby to the first floor, there is also an elevator from the parking garage to the main floor, where more of the senior housing is located.) > What is the height of the canopy at the main entrance to the building? (Gibson: Approximately between 13 and 14 feet.) > Realize that the canopy is establishing the main entrance, but at that height does it provide enough weather protection? (Roope: Shouldn't be an issue because the lobby doors would be open, so one would not need a key to open the door. Canopy height appears to be more like 10 to 11 feet, can look at details City of Burlingame Page 13 Printed on 3M 2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2016 and study further.) (Gibson: Could look at lowering it to match the other canopies, however the design intent was to bring it up higher to announce the entry) > Think the different material face at that area, lighting and signage would be enough of an indicator where the entrance would be, so lowering the canopy might be more useful for the users. > Stepping back the building mass is helpful, but also seems that two of the more robust and outward comers of the building were placed on the park side of the building. Is there a reason why they weren't placed on the front of the building instead of the rear? (Gibson: Tried to accomplish a couple of things. Have two apartment buildings at the rear, some of which have balconies and patios which are very close to our property line. In working with the neighbors, tied to soften that elevation. As a result, transferred that loss of square footage to the front of the building. (Gibson: Also reprogrammed some of the elements on the floor plans at the rear of the building to make it more urban, provide access from the raised patio to grade at rear. This is a four sided structure, not turning our backs to anyone.) > Have you considered changing some of the colors on the building? Concern is with the yellow color on the rooftop mechanical and stairway enclosures. Would like to see a softer color. (Gibson: We could paint them down so that they would only look like an apparatus on the roof. Went through multiple color iterations following the last meeting. Concemed that we were starting to wash out the building, there is a lot of movement and massing on the structure. Feel that contrast of proposed colors will be a signature type of color for this development) > Do you know what brand of paint you're using? Do you have specific color names picked out? (Gibson: Colors are noted on the color board. Can provide additional smaller or larger samples. Not married to the yellow, but want to come up with a color that is agreeable to the Commission.) > Application of colors working well with the continuity of the different planes. Like the way the colors are working now. Only have concern with the Jade color on the awnings it reminds me of 1980's post-modernism, wonted about it getting dated fast. Should revisit this color. > Would like to see storage for bicycles or Lime bikes. Would also like to see seating provided near the entrance. (Gibson: Have programmed in storage for 20 bicycles within the building. We have the room, so we can look into adding those elements.) > Is that a railing at the roof level? Will it be visible from the street? (Gibson: That is actually screening for the rooftop equipment, it will be horizontal banding that looks like it's part of the building. You'd have to be pretty far back to see it from the street.) > Have you considered any other materials other than Hardie for the horizontal lap siding? (Gibson: We Ye used Altura, which is a step down from Hardie if it gets too expensive on a project.) Have you looked at using any wood products? (Gibson: Not for a project of this size. If wood was considered, it would be placed lower on the building so that it could be easily maintained.) (Roope: Durability and maintenance concerns are at the top of the list when building affordable housing. Maintenance of wood is a cost to the property and threatens the long term affordability of the asset. Spend more money if needed upfront on durability to make sure maintenance is not an issue.) > Saw some products at the Pacific Coast Builders Conference this is impregnated wood, it looks great and has a 25 year warranty. I believe the brand was Thermory. Should look into newer product options to see if it would make sense costwise. (Roope: Could look into other options, products are improving over time.) > Recall that at the last meeting, neighbor to rear expressed a concern regarding the existing Cypress tree along the rear property line. (Roope: Have been working closely with the neighbor) Public Comments., Tom Cady, 128 Lorton Avenue: Our property is located directly across the street from the project site. Thanked the Commission for their committment to the community. Noticed evolution of growth in Burlingame, glad to see Commission is here to preserve design standards. Met with developer and have reviewed several of his projects. Believe they have a committment to do things right Am in support of the project. Marina Franco, owner of apartment building behind project site: Thanked developer for working with us to increase setbacks at the rear of the building. The portion of the lot on Park Road is zoned HMU and the City of Burlingame Page 14 Printed on 3/12,2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 park portion of the site on Lorton Avenue is zoned R-4. Will the lot merger affect the zoning? (Hurin: The park portion of the site would remain R-4, unless there is a proposal in the future to rezone the lot.) Tom Hafill, 110 Park Road., Building has a lot of articulation, don't think it needs as many colors as proposed, think one solid color would look better. Thought it was mentioned that there would be 4,000 square feet of commercial space, want to make sure there will be no commercial or retail space in the building. Renderings don't show any utility poles. Existing utility poles are ugly and block views of cars when existing the site. Would like to see utilities placed underground as part of this project. Based on shadow studies, it appears that our pool and gazebo area will be in a shadow all afternoon during the summer months. Would have liked to see building stepped back so that our recreation area wouldn't be in shadows during the summer. Is there any way to revise the project at this point? David Mendell, 214 Lorton Avenue: Project has improved a lot and will continue to improve as it's being processed. Important to complete construction of the public parking garage before the housing project. Because it's such a big project, ft's important to consider where the construction workers will be parking. Mike Dunham: Am a member of a group called Housing for All Burlingame that advocates for renter protections and affordable housing in our community. Thank you all and the developers for the work that's been done so far on this project. We're in a housing crisis but there is in particular an affordable housing crisis. If you look at the Regional Housing Needs Assessment numbers for the last few years, Burlingame has built three affordable units out of 420 that we should have permitted by now. Is an enormous problem that is only getting worse and by the year. Strongly disagree with the suggestion that the parking structure be built first the City would be much better off finding an off-site solution for parking temporarily because you'll need to deal with 100 plus parking spaces disappearing anyways. There is no way the City can absorb that as is you have to rind a solution. Know it's really the City Council's purview, but would strongly encourage that the housing portion be prioritized. Timing matters a lot, would urge you to move this project through as quickly as possible, we are about to face a tsunami of 4,000highly-paid Facebook employees working very nearby in 2020. Hopefully most of them choose to stay wherever they are and ride on buses to get here, but assume some percentage of them will look at the good schools and walkable downtown and will choose to live in Burlingame. That will only make the pressure on renters worse and worse. Two weeks ago met a single mom and her middle -school aged daughter, who are getting their rent increased by $1,000a month from her landlord. She is lucky because she was able to negotiate the rent increase down to $700 a month. I1 you're a homeowner and were told that your property taxes were going up $1,000 a month, you would be very upset and in fact that happened and Prop 13 exists. Renters are getting killed in this City, so it is critical that development happens quickly and it's especially critical that the affordable housing goes in as soon as possible. Urge you to keep this project moving. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. > My understanding of the plans is that the utility poles are remaining in place. In fact the housing project and parking garage had to be stepped back because of the existing utility poles that are remaining in place. > Interpreted the 4,000 square foot commercial space as the area of the community room on the ground floor, but the project still does not include retail or what would be considered as traditional commercial or retail tenant space on that ground floor. > Really like the way that the project has evolved, the articulation and revisions that have been made. Just looking at a side-by-side comparison of the street elevation on the Park Road side, it's dramatically different in terms of the pedestrian experience, including the rhythm of the awnings, the storefront windows, bringing down the garage height, and some of the other articulation, I think is really important along that that side of the of the project. Especially like the element looking from the park area, it's a really nice piece of detailing along that side at the bottom with the awning. Like the way the cornices have been revised and bolstered and think the project is supportable at this point. > Concerned with the integrated muntins in between the glazing. Needs to be reconsidered, can come back as an FYI. In looking at the expressions of the elevations, now have a simple cruciform muntin on City of Burlingame Page 15 Printed on 3/12/5010 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 windows, does help with the articulation of the elevation, but the munfins wont be seen. Think that if they could find a window that has the simulated true divided liter, not looking for a true divided lite window, can be a muntin on the exterior and interior with a spacer bar between the dual glazing. > Like the project, there have been some good changes that happened in the past year. Agree with the comments made regarding the windows and muntin. Would prefer to see no muntins at all rather than the cheap -looking muntins. Renderings are representative of what the building would look like without muntins because they dont show up in the renderings. On the previous project we looked at, the style required that additional articulation in the windows. This style is much simpler and more contemporary and doesn't require the muntins like the style of the last project did. If you cant find a way to solve the problem, then I'd rather not see the muntins at all. > Agree with the comments made regarding the teal color, dont think it's a good choice. > Would like to see a softening of the components on the roof. Like idea of having an area out front to park shared bikes, would help with concern over bikes being left on sidewalks. > Like project and look forward to seeing it started. > Agree with suggestion of having benches ora seating area in front of the building. > Would also like the applicant to look at the Hardie siding or wood siding material options. > Can staff share thoughts on the order of construction, which portion of the project should be built first? (Kane: This is one of several issues that has to be finalized with the City Council because it involves City land. There are issues about construction, staging and how many different contractors at different times you have pouring cement, so that's something that will need to be addressed on the Council side. The action tonight is the design approval and then we will keep you and the public updated, but there are a couple of issues that need to be tied out and that's one of them. Some of that will be dictated by the realities of the economics of the financing structure because this involves a lot of tax credit financing, and also how to minimize impacts on the City. This project will have parking impacts, these are used lots, and so the Cities' Public Works Department will need to work very closely with the project on timing and make sure that we have a back-up plan for how consumers and workers are going to be able to park once these parking lots go offline. There will inevitably be a delay between when one of them goes offline and the parking structure gets built. At a recent City Council study session, the applicant noted that because of the lack of finish work, construction of the parking garage goes faster. So once it gets underway, it has a shorter build time to completion than the housing. > Do you know how long construction will take for the garage? (Grant: Trying to shorten to get much closer to a year.) (Kane: It's an aggressive time frame, 18 months to be safe.) Chair Gaul reopened the public hearing. Roope: Haven't seen the final version of the conditions of approval for the project, but had a few items we wanted to request with your permission. Condition #3 deals with the affordability levels, is subject to City Council, would like to add to that condition the phrase "unless modified by the City Council". Reason for that is that there have been tax law changes in the past year, and there is an opportunity to serve an additional band of income levels that may be more appropriate for teachers in the community, an 80% AN level. Want to preserve the Council the opportunity do that if they so choose. Regarding Condition #28, would be helpful to substitute grading" for building" to be able to submit for a separate grading permit in order to move the project along faster. Could save a few months while the building permit for the project is being processed. (Kane: Difficult to be drafting conditions during the meeting. Note that staff exchanged some edits prior to the meeting, which have been provided to the Commission. Think that wording can still work with a partial permit issuance, that way it is still a building permit, it's just not saying which part of the building permit, so we dont have to redraft the condition.) Roope: Had a question regarding Condition #47, which has to do with the time period we are not allowed to construct because of nesting birds. Usually we see some kind of further definition, such as an endangered bird or protected bird, but the condition is so broad that one could interpret it to mean any type of bird, dont know if that was the intent but that could be a real problem if it includes any type of bird. Dont want to have staff stuck in a box where we're having to conduct a survey for a common bird and City of Budingame Page 16 Printed on 3/172019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 it disrupts the project meaningfully. (Kane: After the first sentence in Condition #47, we could add "to the extent feasible as determined by staff".) Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commissioner Terrones made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to approve the application including the revised conditions provided to the Planning Commission at the meeting, the language discussed for Condition #47, and the following condition: > that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an FYI for Planning Commission review of the following items: revise the type and style of windows from internal grids to either simulated true divided muntins with a spacer bar between the dual glazing or windows with no muntins; provide window details and revise building elevationstrenderings; revisit the color specified for the storefront and awnings ("Jargon Jade" or equal previously specified); - revisit the color specified for the structures on the roof ("Honey Bees" or equal previously specified); provide bicycle parking and bench seating near the main entrance to the building; must be determined feasible by the Department of Public Works if provided within the right-of-way; and - revisit alternative options for the Hardie horizontal lap siding, such as wood or other material. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse h. 160 Lorton Avenue (Parking Lot N), zoned R-4: Application for Design Review and Lot Merger for construction of a new five -level parking garage. The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines (Infill Exemption). (Chris Grant, The Pacific Companies, applicant; City of Burlingame, property owner; Watry Design, Inc., designer) (319 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 160 Lorton Ave (Lot N) - Staff Report 160 Lorton Ave (Lot N) - Attachments CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption 160 Lorton Ave (Lot N) - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Planning Manager Hunn provided an overview of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. City of Burlingame Page 17 Printed on 3112/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 Chris Grant and Genaro Morales, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Do you have any point of reference as to what the metal mesh will look like? Suggest taking a look at the mesh on the wall of the Audi dealer on Broadway, it's handled very well on the that building. Would help to jazz up the building given the amount of concrete on the structure. (Morales: Included a detail of the mesh in the attachments.) > Mesh is a woven wire fabric, so there will need to be a subframe to attached that to, but it is not shown on the rendering. Concerned the frame will be larger and overdone, don't want to see huge members holding up the light fabric. (Morales: Agree, there are two reasons not to build it that way. First, the expense of using a lot of steel. Second, don't want it to be bulky. It will be a tension fabric, so it will be supported at the top and bottom to provide the tension. So will try to minimize the size of the subframe.) > Concrete is poured in place, not precast, correct? (Morales: That is correct.) > Some of it will be high end, architectural finish, right? (Morales. We are proposing for the board form to show the ties and provide a smoother finish than what is normally done.) > When I hear board form, I think of a rugged, very textured finish. (Morales: No, it's the form work, will provide a smooth finish.) > Will all the concrete be the same color, or will there be variation of color? (Morales: The color may vary in tones, based on the way it's poured. The intent is not to color the concrete. Difference would be in the finish, which would provide some reflection and contrast. If you want color, might as well paint it.) > Like the paseo along the side of the structure. There is a passage gateway feature at the alley along Burlingame Avenue between Lorton Avenue and California Drive. Would like to see a pedestrian scale created to the entrance to the paseo on either end, would make it more special to enter and walk along the paseo, given that the structure is so tall. (Morales: Can take a look at that.) > Has there been any consideration given to a zip car operation here? This solution works well in San Francisco and helps to get people out of owning cars. (Grant: Willing to work with staff, conversation are ongoing.) (Kane: Zip car feature would not change the architecture of the building. These programming questions will be up to the City to decide in the long term. Project has agreed to provide the conduit so that we can have EV charging stations in a designated area.) > Can you tell us more about the panels needed to conceal headlights? Will they be colored? (Morales: Panels will be prefinished 16 -gauge plates. Will be colored.) Public Comments: Gary Vielbam, business owner at 124 Highland Avenue: Located across the street from project. Need access on Highland Avenue, concerned with the amount of construction material, staging and construction workers and how it will impact my business. Need to be able to maneuver cars in and out of shop. David Mendell: In support of project, parking is needed downtown. Passageway appears too narrow for the trees as shown. Hopes this does not become a hold site for construction of the housing project, want to keep project moving, downtown desperately needs parking. Michael Brownrigg: Thanked Commission for their time on the housing project, design got a lot better. Is one step closer to 132 families having a place to live. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Have come to like the design as it is now proposed. Critical that details on screen mesh be worked out. Like the way it adds varied mass to the building. Like the idea of enclosing the stair with the mesh, will be a much nicer experience with the open stair. City of Burlingame Page 18 Printed on 3/12/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 > Like the way the massing is articulated, has some calm to it. Variation between metal panels and cable railings at lower level, adds articulation and spark. Storefront glass helps with the pedestrian experience. Paseo helps soften building along ground level and provide connection without having to walk through the garage. > Assume there will be a construction logistics plan that gets worked out with Public Works in terms of timing sequencing, construction worker parking, etc. > Did not see any parking signage on the plans, assume there will be lighted signs indicating available parking. > Like the way the project is simplified, with a simple concrete structure, cable rail, and a few urban gestures with the metal panels. > Based on its location and proximity to residential uses, feel that it is still too rough around the edges for being a mid -block large parking structure. Missing level of charm, needs to be a little better for its location. > Project has improved a lot since the first iteration. No matter what, it is still a large parking structure. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Loftis, to approve the application with the following condition: > that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an FYI for Planning Commission review of the details of the architectural screening and a detail of the sub frame showing how the architectural screening is supported/attached to the parking structure. Comment on the motion: > Should think about the architectural screen very carefully and what is used to hold up the screen. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Sargent, Loftis, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse Nay: 1 - Kelly 9. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY a. 1628 Lassen Way, zoned R-1- Application for Design Review for a major renovation and first and second story addition, including Front and Side Setback Variances to increase the height of nonconforming walls and Side Setback Variance for the first floor addition. (Master SWU Associates, Steve Wu, applicant and designer; Jeff Leung, property owner) (139 noticed) Staff contact: Sonal Aggarwal Attachments: 1628 Lassen Way - Staff Report 1628 Lassen Way - Attachments 1628 Lassen Way - Plans All Commissioners had visited the project site. There were no ex -parte communications to report. Senior Planner Keylon provided an overview of the staff report. > Do we know what the block average is for the front setback? (Keylon: Can review the plans to see if that information is provided. However, the minimum required front setback to a garage is 25 feet.) > The plate heights are being raised throughout the first floor to 10 feet, except at the garage where it's increasing from 8 feet to 9 feet, correct? (Keylon. No, the garage plate height is also being raised to 10 feet.) City or Burlingame Page 19 Printed on 311711019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 Chair Gaul opened the public hearing. Steve Wu, project designer, represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > The only area where the plate height is increasing from 8 to 10 feet is the great room, but would a variance still be required for increasing the plate heights from 8 to 9 feet? (Key/on: Yes, a variance is required because the plate heights are increasing on nonconforming walls; considered to be an intensification of a nonconforming wall.) > What is the purpose of increasing the plate heights throughout the ground floor? (Wu: Project includes removing most of the existing walls, increasing bedrooms sizes, and modernizing the space, so it's a matter of proportion. Great room at rear of house includes dining room, family room and kitchen. So given its size, felt that increasing the plate height would be in proportion with the space in plan view. Reason for the front setback variance at the garage was to raise the plate height so that it is consistent with the rest of the house along the front facade. Plate height for the existing garage sits 20 inches below what is being proposed.) > In looking at the building section on sheet A06, you're increasing the plate height to 10 feet, but you're also vaulting the ceiling. Do you still feel you need to increase the plate height to 10 feet even though you're vaulting the ceiling? (Wu., Yes.) > One of the hardest things in justifying a variance is making a finding that there is an exceptional circumstance that is related to the property itself that is different than the surrounding properties. It's unclear from this application what is unique about this property than the neighboring properties. (Wu: Difference is that this property will be improved and have modem spaces, which is why we decided to raise the ceilings to be consistent with the proportions. Larger spaces with an 8 foot ceiling would feel squat. Would point out that the existing living room has a 9 foot ceiling, so property owner has a sense of the difference between 8 and 9 foot ceilings and made the decision to inbrease the plate height to 9 feet.) > Currently have walkways from the sidewalk and driveway leading to the front door. Proposed landscape plan shows eliminating the walkway from the sidewalk and changing the walkway from the driveway to the new front door. Will the remaining area in the front yard and along the side of the house really just be grass? Will there be any planting areas? (Wu: Yes, that is correct.) Would encourage you to revist the landscape plan to add more planting areas and softening of the building. > What is meant by "stacked stone" as indicated for the wainscoting on the house? (Wu: Stacked stone is a stone veneer that is attached as a siding material, comes in 4 foot panels.) How thick is the stone veneer? (Wu: It's 5 inches thick.) > Presume that at the new entry, the stone veneer does not tum back towards the door, but rather shears off at the entry towards the north side. At the garage side, is the stone veneer glued on to the front of the garage or does it return down the side of the garage? (Wu: Stone veneer does return along the exterior sides of the house, as well as on the inside wall towards the entry.) > Stone veneer is 5 inches thick, so will it sit proud of the stucco by approximately 4 inches. Will there be a cap on the veneer? (Wu: Yes, there will be a cap on it.) This should be articulated on the plans. > The way the building elevations are drawn, it appears that the stucco is proud of the stone veneer, is that what you intended? (Wu: No, that was not intended. Will revise the building elevations accordingly.) > How do you propose to increase the plate heights? (Wu: To increase plate heights from 8 to 9 feet, would use a 3 1/2 x 11 718 psl beam on top of the existing wall. To increase plate to 10 feet, would build a wall on top of the existing wall and shear it with plywood.) > So you wouldn't need to remove the stucco? (Wu., The intent is not to remove the existing stucco.) > Will be doing a lot of work to make the walls taller and the entire existing roof is being removed, so have you thought of moving the walls in to comply with setback requirements and eliminating some of the variance requests? (Wu, Trying to keep costs down, so would be concerned with pouring new foundations for new walls.) > What type of windows are being proposed? (Wu: Aluminum clad are proposed.) City of Burlingame Page 20 Printed on 311212019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 Public Comments: There were no public comments. Chair Gaul closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > We have on occasion for some variances accepted as a unique circumstance, a building that was built prior to having ordinances and setback requirements. While the existing footprint of the house could be accepted as an exceptional circumstance, could not make the finding that by not granting the variance, the property owner is being denied a property right. There doesn't seem to be a substantial property right that is lost through denial of the variance. Don't see a right to have a 9 or 10 foot plate height as a reasonable property right that if we deny the variance they wouldn't have access to. Can't make the findings for the variance. > While we may consider a 9 or 10 foot plate on a new house, if it complied with all of the development requirements, we may be able to make that consideration. However, can't make that in this case if we have to grant a variance, especially considering that the house doesn't need to have that height. In fact by having that height, it make the first floor look that much taller relative to a lot of the other houses in the neighborhood. For most houses of the same style and character, the eave is just above the garage door, and that is what is typically seen as the character and pattern in the neighborhood. Having a tall first floor and garage hurts the design. Can't make findings for design review based on the proposed design. > Having difficulty with the variance requests. Also concerned with the massing, is front -loaded, which is what we try to avoid. > Concerned with how stacked stone will look like, so would be helpful to see a sample. > This project is a good candidate for a design review consultant. Commissioner Kelly made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to refer the application to a design review consultant. Commission Discussion: > Existing plate heights should be kept as they are, would eliminate a lot of problems. > See no justification for the variances, especially in this neighborhood. > There are still a lot of single story bungalows in this neighborhood. The intent of the design guidelines is to minimize second floors, think this design has a long way to go to address our concerns. > 9 foot second floor plate height also needs to be looked at. > Applicant should discuss with the design review consultant the landscape plan. Don't need a lot of detail, but needs to be thought through in terms of planting areas and large species as opposed to a simple indication of just lawn. > There are a few large houses in the neighborhood and on that block, would caution the applicant that many of those houses were built prior to design review, so shouldn't look to those as examples to follow. > Should consider adding a front porch, is exempt from floor area ratio and would add to the depth of the house. > To help with keeping a lower profile on the second floor, should consider changing the gables to hip roofs since there is a predominant profile of a hipped roof. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, Comaroto, Gaul, Terrones, and Tse 10. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS City of Burlingame Page 21 Printed on 7/12/2019 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 10, 2018 There were no Commissioners reports. 11. DIRECTOR REPORTS a. 185 Pepper Avenue - FYI for changes requested by the Planning Commission to a previously approved Design Review project. Attachments: 185 Peooer Ave -Memorandum 185 Pepper Ave -Attachments 185 Pepper Ave - Aporoved Plans 185 Pepper Ave - Proposed Plans Accepted. 12. ADJOURNMENT Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on December 10, 2018. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on December 20, 2018, the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $551, which includes noticing costs. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Community Development/Planning counter, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. City of Burlingame Page 22 Printed on 311212019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO: 8h To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 From: Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works — (650) 558-7230 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Professional Services Agreement with CSG Consultants for Project Management and Construction Inspection Services for the City Parking Garage at Parking Lot N, Located at 160 Lorton Avenue, in the Amount of $208,320 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a professional services agreement with CSG Consultants for project management and construction inspection services related to the construction of the City Parking Garage at Parking Lot N, located at 160 Lorton Avenue, in the amount of $208,320, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND The Village at Burlingame project includes the construction of a 132 -unit affordable housing development on Parking Lot F and a five -story, 328 stall parking garage at Lot N. The Pacific Companies is the project's developer. The initial stages of construction have begun, and staff is seeking consultant expertise assistance to provide oversight of the construction of the parking garage to ensure it is built in accordance with plans and specifications. The garage construction is estimated to last 12 to 18 months and cost approximately $14 million. DISCUSSION Staff negotiated the attached scope of professional services with CSG Consultants in the amount of $208,320 to provide project management and construction inspection services for the parking garage facility. CSG has been providing consultant assistance to the City for other private development projects such as the construction of the Burlingame Point Project and Summerhill Project. Both projects are multifaceted, involve interface with public improvements, and include the construction of large garages. The consultant firm has extensive experience in providing construction inspection services, is familiar with the City's requirements, and has assisted the City with several private development projects currently underway. Below is a summary of the scope of work: • Perform day-to-day construction inspections; • Provide daily construction observation reports, including photographs of various 1 Project Management and Construction Inspection Services for the City Parking Garage November 4, 2019 at Parking Lot N infrastructure elements at key milestone points; • Understand the goals and objectives, enforcing all standards and requirements while coordinating with all stakeholders to keep the project moving; • Understand and enforce all governing documents, including the development agreement, conditions of approval, and other pertinent agreements; • Perform public outreach services; • Coordinate with project contractor for issues pertaining to compliance; • Coordinate with geotechnical engineer on the observance and responsibility of grading operations; • Oversee the quality control for all off-site infrastructure improvements; • Perform independent construction quality assurance for all on-site parking garage features; • Coordinate with other governing entities such as water districts, PG&E, AT&T, and Comcast to ensure there are no conflicts with agency standards; • Bring any conflicts or necessary changes in the field to the attention of the project manager and resolve any conflicts in an expeditious manner; and • Conduct final walk through and develop punch -list for final approval. Please refer to Exhibit A of the attached Profession Services Agreement for further details. FISCAL IMPACT There are adequate funds available in the Downtown Parking In -Lieu Fee Funds to undertake this work. If approved, staff will include a request for the appropriation of $208,320 in the mid -year budget review. Exhibits: • Resolution • Professional Services Agreement • Project Location Map 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CSG FOR PROJEECT MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CITY PARKING GARAGE AT PARKING LOT N LOCATED AT 160 LORTON AVENUE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $208,320, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT CITY PROJECT NO. 85550 RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California which FINDS, ORDERS and DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is instructed to attest such signature. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 411 day of November, 2019 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION SERVICES WITH CSG CONSULTANTS FOR CITY GARAGE AT 160 LORTON AVENUE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 2019, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the "City", and CSG Consultants engaged in providing professional engineering services herein called the "Consultant". RECITALS A. The City is considering conducting activities for consultant engineering services for construction management and inspection services for the City Parking Garage at Lot N. B. The City desires to engage a professional engineering consultant to provide construction management and inspection servicers because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to perform the desired work, described in Exhibit A. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide professional engineering services such as day-to-day inspection services, quality assurance, and as detailed in "Scope of Services' of the attached Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement with completion of all work by June 30, 2020. 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all Page 1 of 8 times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed $208,320.00; and payment shall be based upon City approval of each task. Billing shall include current period and cumulative expenditures to date and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only in partial or draft form. 7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Nourdin Khayata, Vice President, Constructio Management. Page 2 of 8 9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to: To City: Martin Quan City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 To Consultant: Nourdin Khayata CSG Consultants 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or Page 3 of 8 its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever any such employment relationship. 13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act. 14. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage in a form at least as broad as ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Page 4 of 8 iii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each claim/aggregate sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. iv. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. B. General and Automobile Liability Policies: i. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or used by the Consultant. The endorsement providing this additional insured coverage shall be equal to or broader than ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint negligence, completed operations, and the acts of subcontractors. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurances maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Page 5 of 8 C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees. D. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by mail, has been given to the City (10 days for non-payment of premium). Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. E. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A -:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California. F. Verification of Coverage: Upon execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on forms approved by the City. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City, its officers, employees, authorized agents and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from, relate to, or be set up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant. This provision shall not apply if the damage or injury is caused by the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers. Page 6 of 8 16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo. 18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party. Page 7 of 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1). City of Burlingame By Lisa K. Goldman City Manager Approved as to form: City Attorney — Kathleen Kane ATTEST: City Clerk - Meaghan Hassel -Shearer "Consultant" CSG Consultants Nourdin Khayata Vice President Page 8 of 8 CSG CONSULTANTS October 25, 2019 Martin Quan, PE Senior Civil Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 phone 650.522.2500 fax 650.522.2599 www.csgengr.com RE: Construction Inspection Services for Lot N Parking Structure Project CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is pleased to present this proposal to the City of Burlingame (City) to provide project management and field inspection services for the Lot N Parking Structure (Project). Staffing CSG proposes Mojtaba Nahrvar, EIT, will serve as the primary field engineer for this project. He brings over 8 years of engineering and inspection services. Mr. Nahrvar is currently providing similar services on the Burlingame Point and Summerhill Development projects. He has also Performed similar services for major developments in the City of Foster City, including the BMR Life Sciences Campus, Gilead Sciences Campus, the Triton Apartments, and the Foster Square developments. He performed field inspection for all infrastructure work related to these developments including grading, sewer, water, drainage, bioswales, concrete and asphalt as well roadway structural section. He attended meetings with the developers/contractors and stakeholders, coordinated activities and inspection schedule to meet the need and provided progress reports to the City project manager. Mr. Nahrvar will oversee the day-to-day construction in terms traffic control implementation, pedestrian facility implementation, stormwater implementation and all off-site infrastructure construction. It is anticipated based on the Contractor's schedule that multiple Saturdays will see major pouring operations take place. Mr. Nahrvar will cover those operations to ensure the entire pour plan is implemented based on the Contractor -approved submittal. Scope of Services We understand that the City is seeking construction management services for the construction of a new parking structure. The project is situated in downtown between Highland Avenue and Lorton Avenue on existing Lot N. The 5 story Parking Garage will have 368 spaces will replace the existing 2015 spaces that currently Lot N provides. The project is anticipated to start in October of 2019 and be completed in approximately 14 months. Mr. Nahrvar will meet with the Contractor on a daily basis to go over the schedule and workload. Daily inspection reports will be written and provided to the City project manager, so he/she is kept aware of all the field progress on the project. He will follow up on the processing of submittals with the appropriate party with emails, phone calls, or office meetings if necessary. Mr. Nahrvar will be available on a daily basis and will look to help resolve conflicts in an expeditious manner Understanding the goals and objectives of developers vs. the governing agency and enforcing the standards and requirements of the agencies while coordinating with all stakeholders to keep projects moving P Understanding and enforcing all governing documents including development agreement, conditions of approval, and other pertinent agreements 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 CSG phone 650.522.2500 fax 650.522.2599 CONSULTANTS www.csgengr.com P Coordination with other governing entities such as water districts, PG&E, AT&T, and Comcast to ensure no conflicts with ogencies'standords P Bringing any conflicts or necessary changes in the field to the attention of the project manager P Coordinating with Geotechnical Engineering on the observance and responsibility of grading operation Fee Schedule Provided on the following page is CSG's proposed fee for this project. The proposed cost is for the duration of October 2019 through December 2020. The cost is based on part-time construction inspection during the week and full-time Saturday inspection. The proposed cost is an estimation based on the information provided in the meeting with the City. We look forward to continuing our working relationship with the City of Burlingame. If you have any questions, please contact me at (650) 522-2524 or by email at nourdin@csgengr.com. Sincerely, Nourdin Khayata Vice President, Construction Management FOSTER CITY I PLEASANTON I SAN JOSE I SACRAMENTO I NEWMAN I ORANGE I REDLANDS CSG Cost Proposal for Project Management and Inspection for City of Burlingame Lot N Parking Structure Project Labor Fee Summary Role Total Labor Fee Construction inspection $142,800 Overtime (for Inspector) $65,520 TotalFee $208,320 Assumptions Duration for all aforementioned projects is assumed to be 14 months Overtime / Weekend work will be billed at 1.5 x the proposed hourly rate Material testing and Geotechnical engineering is handled by the developer rbptla�d Pocket Park Al gyp } 6, is, Proposed LOT F Apartment. Aor Y'g. 19- °"`'""�''', gars"" `�,• '`�' � ,... Parking' LOT Structure S � y ' L� `oj BURL AGENDA NO: 8i STAFF REPORT W MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 From: Lisa K. Goldman, City Manager — (650) 558-7243 Subject: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Up to $15,000 in Matching Funds for Holiday Decorations in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Commercial Districts RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the expenditure of up to $15,000 in matching funds for holiday decorations in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway commercial districts. BACKGROUND At the August 19 Council meeting, Mayor Colson appointed a subcommittee composed of herself and Councilmember Keighran to work with the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District (DBID) to increase holiday lighting in the District in order to attract customers during the holiday shopping season. DISCUSSION Since the August meeting, the subcommittee and the DBID leadership have worked together to develop a plan to light the trees on Burlingame Avenue, the trellises, and the Burlingame Train Station. As the DBID already has the lights, the total cost of the private labor is $12,735. The Broadway Avenue Business Improvement District (BBID) is also interested in improving its holiday decorations. No plans have been developed yet. In order to ensure equitable treatment between the two commercial districts, staff proposes that the City contribute up to $7500 to each BID, provided that the BIDs provide matching funds of at least $2500 and a detailed plan of how they will spend the funds. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this action is up to $15,000. The City Council's special promotions budget only has sufficient funding to light City Hall during the holidays. Therefore, funds will need to be appropriated from undesignated fund balance during the mid -year budget update. 1 Holiday Decorations in the Commercial Districts Exhibit: Resolution November 4, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $15,000 IN MATCHING FUNDS FOR HOLIDAY DECORATIONS IN THE BURLINGAME AVENUE AND BROADWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, a City Council subcommittee has been working with the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District (DBID) to increase holiday lighting in the District in order to attract customers during the holiday shopping season; and WHEREAS, the subcommittee and the DBID leadership have worked together to develop a plan to light the trees on Burlingame Avenue, the trellises, and the Burlingame Train Station; and WHEREAS, the DBID already has the lights, so the total cost of the private labor is $12,735; and WHEREAS, the Broadway Avenue Business Improvement District (BBID) is also interested in improving its holiday decorations, but no plans have been developed yet; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure equitable treatment between the two commercial districts, staff proposes that the City contribute up to $7500 to each BID, provided that the BIDS provide matching funds of at least $2500 and a detailed plan of how they will spend the funds. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME authorizes the expenditure of up to $15,000 in matching funds for holiday decorations in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Commercial Districts. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4t' day of November, 2019, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk • BURLINGAME STAFF Ri 9YOw1 (CD To: Date: From: Honorable Mayor and City Council November 4, 2019 AGENDA NO: MEETING DATE Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works - (650) 558-7230 November 4, 2019 Subject: Adoption of Resolutions Authorizing Professional Services Agreements with The EDCCO Group and Telstar Instruments for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System Services Related to the City's Utility Infrastructure System for $375,000 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions authorizing professional services agreements with The EDCCO Group, Inc. (EDCCO) and Telstar Instruments, Inc. (Telstar) for the maintenance of the City's SCADA System in a cumulative amount of $375,000. BACKGROUND The Public Works Department's SCADA System was commissioned in 2003 and has been in service for over 15 years, continually operating, 24 hours per day. The only upgrade during this time period was to the systems central computer system or Human Machine Interface (HMI), which is located at the Public Works Corporation Yard. The SCADA system provides operations' staff with the ability to remotely monitor and control the City's potable water, wastewater collections, and stormwater facilities. The potable water pump stations are equipped with local intelligence to operate the pumps based on the corresponding reservoir levels. The wastewater and stormwater pump stations are controlled based on their local wet well levels. While the pump stations operate independently, the SCADA system utilizes the HMI to monitor the 21 sites throughout the city and sends alarms to operators when conditions are outside of pre -arranged set points. Burlingame's Mission Control SCADA System operates on a 24/7/365 basis. Maintaining an efficient SCADA system is critical and requires specialized skills in programmable logic controls (PLCs), plus hardware and software diagnostics. Although the City has an Instrumentation Mechanic position within the department, this position is mainly utilized for oversight of the central computer system (HMI) and maintenance of the pump stations. The technician coordinates with the department's Maintenance Electrician, Automotive Mechanics, and consultants appropriately, after executing trouble -shooting techniques within the scope of knowledge. However, for extensive and in-depth programming, system integration, and industrial level instrumentation work, the City utilizes outside consultant expertise. 1 SCADA Services Agreements November 4, 2019 DISCUSSION The City currently utilizes two vendors who specialize in providing SCADA services and have in- depth knowledge in programmable logic and the software (Wonderware) that operates the City's SCADA System. Each of these vendors has a team of staff, including system integrators, computer programmers, radio technicians, and industrial control electricians with years of industry specific knowledge related to their field. Additionally, both companies have a long track record of providing successful SCADA services to the City and other municipalities, which allows them to efficiently troubleshoot and recommend improvements to Burlingame's system. EDCCO has provided services to the City since 2012, and Telstar since 2013. Both vendors play an intricate role in the maintenance and operation of the City's system. The current agreements with the vendors will be expiring in the near future, and the department would like to establish three-year agreements, with two additional one-year terms, based on the following scope of work: • EDCCO SCADA Services: - 24 -Hour emergency response to communication failures, historian data loss, and hardware failures. • Telstar SCADA Services: - Scheduled service calls, hardware and software upgrades, server maintenance, communication failure investigations, historian data loss recoveries, and hardware failures analysis. In addition, ongoing system analysis in order to recommend, design, and implement system -wide upgrades and improvements. Staff has negotiated a three-year service agreement with EDCCO Group in an amount not to exceed $75,000 and similarly negotiated a service agreement with Telstar Instruments for three years in an amount not to exceed $300,000. Below are the cost breakdowns year by year for both vendors. FISCAL IMPACT The total combined estimated cost for both service agreements for a period of three years is $375,000. There are adequate funds available in the FY 2019-20 Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Operation budgets to cover the costs for the first year. Funding for future years will be included in future budgets. Exhibits: • Resolution for EDCCO Service Agreement • Resolution for Telstar Service Agreement 2 Totals Vendor Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 (not to exceed) The EDCCO Group $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $75,000 Telstar Instruments $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 FISCAL IMPACT The total combined estimated cost for both service agreements for a period of three years is $375,000. There are adequate funds available in the FY 2019-20 Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Operation budgets to cover the costs for the first year. Funding for future years will be included in future budgets. Exhibits: • Resolution for EDCCO Service Agreement • Resolution for Telstar Service Agreement 2 SCADA Services Agreements • EDCCO Professional Services Agreement • Telstar Professional Services Agreement November 4, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE EDCCO GROUP FOR SCADA SERVICES RELATED TO THE CITY'S UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California which FINDS, ORDERS and DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above, in substantially the form attached. The City Manager is authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is instructed to attest such signature. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 411 day of November, 2019 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS FOR SCADA SERVICES RELATED TO THE CITY'S UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California which FINDS, ORDERS and DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above, in substantially the form attached. Burlingame. The City Manager is authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of The City Clerk is instructed to attest such signature. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4 1 day of November, 2019 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE EDCCO GROUP, INC THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 2019, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the "City", and The Edcco Group, Inc. engaged in providing Supervisory Control and Data Acquistion (SCADA) services herein called the "Consultant". RECITALS A. The City is considering conducting activities for consultant services for electrical instrumentation/control engineering, SCADA programming and support, and pump station diagnostics. B. The City desires to engage a professional consultant to provide 24-hour emergency response to communication failures, historian data loss and hardware failures related to the departments pump stations because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to perform the desired work, described in Exhibit A. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide professional services such as services including, but not limited to, electrical instrumentation/control engineering, SCADA programming and support, and pump station diagnostics and as detailed in "Scope of Services" of the attached Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement with completion of all work by December 31, 2022. 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Page 1 of 8 Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed $25,000 per year; and payment shall be based upon City approval of each task. Billing shall include current period and cumulative expenditures to date and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only in partial or draft form. 7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. Page 2 of 8 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Michael Heathcote, Streets, Storm Drains & Sewer Division Manager. 9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to: To City: Kevin Dawdy City of Burlingame 1361 N Carolan Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 To Consultant: Eric Daniels The Edcco Group, Inc 195 Glenn Wayt, Suite 100 San Carlos, CA 94070 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. Page 3 of 8 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever any such employment relationship. 13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act. 14. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage in a form at least as broad as ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001. Page 4 of 8 ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each claim/aggregate sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. iv. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. B. General and Automobile Liability Policies: The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or used by the Consultant. The endorsement providing this additional insured coverage shall be equal to or broader than ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint negligence, completed operations, and the acts of subcontractors. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurances maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Page 5 of 8 iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees. D. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by mail, has been given to the City (10 days for non-payment of premium). Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. E. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A -:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California. F. Verification of Coverage: Upon execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on forms approved by the City. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City, its officers, employees, authorized agents and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from, relate to, or be set up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which Page 6 of 8 arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant. This provision shall not apply if the damage or injury is caused by the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers. 16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo. 18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party. Page 7 of 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1). City of Burlingame Lisa K. Goldman City Manager Approved as to form: City Attorney — Kathleen Kane ATTEST: City Clerk - Meaghan Hassel -Shearer "Consultant" Eric Daniels Print Name: Title: Page 8 of 8 The EDCCO Group, Inc. Engineering and Control Solutions The EDCCO Group, Inc. 195 Glenn Way San Carlos, CA 94070 Phone: (650) 63-SCADA FAX: (650) 649-2328 Contact: Eric Daniel 195 Glenn Way, Suite 100 San Carlos, CA 94070 www.edcco.com EXHIBIT A Phone (650) 63-SCADA Phone (650) 364-6683 FAX (650) 649-2328 October, 2019 PROPOSAL FOR ON CALL SERVICE FOR BURLINGAME PUBLIC WORKS ON-CALL SCADA AND CONTROL SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE AND TROUBLESHOOTING CHAPTER 1: - SUMMARY The City owns and operates several facilities including sewer lift stations; storm water pump stations; potable water pump stations, storage and regulating stations. These facilities are monitored with a SCADA system consisting of Allen Bradley Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), Wonderware Human Machine Interface (HMI) software, and various motor control and instrumentation systems. Communications to remote facilities is provided by Metricom, Shlumberger, and Landis and Gyr wireless radios. The EDCCO Group is very familiar with all of the facilities at the City of Burlingame and the equipment at each facility. The EDCCO Group has with the following minimum skills to provide on-call maintenance and troubleshooting services for the entire SCADA system: — Detailed knowledge of Allen Bradley DF1, DH+ protocols; — Multi -vendor HMI support; — Experienced with SQL server; — Experienced with Wonderware platform; — Experienced with the Windows platform; — Experienced with Allen Bradley PLCs; — Experienced and have equipment for maintaining replacing, and programming the city's radios and network In addition, the EDCCO Group is specifically familiar with the individual facilities at the City of Burlingame. Many of these facilities have older equipment with little or no documentation. EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 2: - QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM The EDCCO Group has been in business for 23 years. The EDCCO Group engages in design, development, installation programming, and maintenance of municipal automation systems. Installation with similar hardware and architecture The City of Foster City, Allen Smith, asmith @fostercitv.org (650) 286-3546 Ongoing maintenance of 50+ water and sewage stations, Allen Bradley PLCs, licensed UHF radios, and outboard equipment. Recent upgrade (2017) of Wonderware Application with Terminal Services and 9 remote access servers City of Burlingame, Abe Kirshenbaum, akirshenbaum(a)burlinoame.org (650) 558-7675 Ongoing maintenance of 30+ water and sewage stations, PLCs, radios, and outboard equipment. Allen Bradley PLCs, Utilinet radios, and Allen Bradley PLCs. Town of Hillsborough, Cary Dahl cdahl(a)hillsborough.net (650)375-7512 Ongoing maintenance of 20+ water and sewage stations, Allen Bradley PLCs, Utilinet radios, and outboard equipment. (functionally the same equipment and architecture as Burlingame) The City of Redwood, Justin Ezel, jezel@redwoodcity.org (650) 780-7474 Ongoing maintenance of 75+ water, sewage, and storm stations and recycled water plant. Allen Bradley PLCs, Maple HMIs, licensed UHF radios, telephone ADN circuit, and outboard equipment. Recent upgrade (2017) of Wonderware Application with Terminal Services and 9 remote access servers City of San Bruno, Mark Reinhardt, mreinhardt(a'Dsanbruno.org (650) 616-7167 Upgrade of 28 water facilities and 7 sewer facilities, to Allen Bradley PLCs, licensed radio SCADA System, Wonderware, radio survey and radio network design. Ongoing maintenance of 30+ water and sewage stations, PLCs, radios, and outboard equipment. Marina Coast Water District, James Derbin,iderbin anmcwd.org (831) 883-5903 Upgrade of 40 sewer and water facilities, to Allen Bradley PLCs, Radio SCADA System, Wonderware, radio survey and radio network design. Recent upgrade $25,000 (2017) of Wonderware Application with Terminal Services and remote access servers. North Coast Water, Norm Regrant nregnart annccwd.org Ongoing maintenance of 20+ water stations, Allen Bradley PLCs, licensed UHF radios, and outboard equipment. Recent upgrade (2015) of Wonderware Application with Terminal Services Radio surveys CHAPTER 3: - WORK PLAN EXHIBIT A We are on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week. If anyone goes on vacation, various contacts at the city will be notified an advance by email with the name and contact information of the person on call during the vacation. We know the locations of all of the City's facilities and have keys and access codes to enter without any assistance of City personnel if needed. We maintain a stocking inventory (see below) of many items used at the various city facilities, meaning most items are repaired in a minimal time and on the first visit. We do not charge for travel time, and our billing minimum is one hour. Non -emergency or routine services are usually handled on the next business day. Stock Inventory for City of Burlingame Allen Bradley ■ SLC 5/04 CPU ■ SLC 5/05 CPU • 1747-NI4 Analog Input Module • 1747-NI8 Analog Input Module ■ 1747-NO4 Analog Output Module • 1747-IB16 Digital Input Module • 1747-OV16 Digital Output Module ■ 1747 -KE Communication Processor ■ Micrologix 1100 (24 vdc) PLC ■ Panelview 600 6 inch monochrome display • Panelview Plus 2711 P 10 inch color display • SLC PLC racks Siemens Milltronics • Milltronics Multiranger 200 Controller (24 VCD power) ■ Milltronics XPs-15 Transducer with 100 foot cable Druck ■ Submersible wetwell level transmitter Rosemount ■ 2088 and 3051 pressure and level transmitter ■ 2088 and 3051 differential pressure and level transmitter ■ 2 valve and 5 valve manifolds Landis and Gyr • Utilinet IWR4 radio transceiver (24 VCD power) • Wangate Series IV pole -top radio, brackets, and cables • Laptop computers with latest version (2019) of Radioshop • Latest version of Landis and Gyr DCW compiler CHAPTER 4: ATTACHMENTS' Attachment A: Rate sheet Attachment B: Certificate of Insurance Attachment C: City of Burlingame business license The Group, Inc. Engineering and Control Solutions 195 Glenn Way, Suite 100 P.O. Box 411 San Carlos, Calif. 94070 email: info@EDCCO.Com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A Phone (650) 63-SCADA Phone (650) 637-2232 FAX (650) 649-2328 RATESCHEDULE ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENTATON/CONTROL ENGINEERING SCADA PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT Effective Dates January 1, 2019 Engineering Services: Senior Principal Engineer Senior Systems Engineer: SCADA System Engineer/Programmer Field Service Technician Staff Engineer Drafting/CAD: Clerical/Admin: Travel Time: Mileage: Additional Materials: San Mateo County — No mileage, travel time, or minimum charged. By: z�-ea The EDCCO Group Eric Daniel, President $175.00/hour $175.00/hour $165.00/hour $150.00/hour $130.00/hour $125.00/hour $ 70.00/hour $125.00 /hour $ 0.585 / mile Cost plus 15% EDCCO-1 106 SH � MM�DOPPYYY) 07/01/2019 ACORG7' CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER 410-901-0743 Risk Placement Services, Inc. 204 Cedar Street Cambridge, MD 21613 coNTACT Shelaya Broadwater PHONE 410-901-0743 FAX 410-901-0843 A/c, No, Ext): AIC, No): E-MAIL shelaya_broadwater@rpsins.com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC q G. Philip Feldman INSURER A: Great American of New York 22136 INSURED The EDCCO Group INSURER B: Philadelphia Indemnity Company 18058 INSURER C 195 Glenn Way, STE. 100 San Carlos, CA 94070 07/18/2019 07/18/2020 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: r,.— /`c0TlUlf'ATc luilsnotGo- RFVISInN Nt1MRFR-- VVYGRMV CJ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR I TRTYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUB POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MMIDD M) POLICY EXP YYYYi LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Burlingame, CA 94010 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1'000'000 PREMIAMASETORENTEDn 300,000 CLAIMS -MADE � OCCUR Y SPP6175204 07/18/2019 07/18/2020 MED EXP (Anyoneperson) 10,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY 1'000'6-0 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: X POLICY D PRO F—] JECT LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE 2'000'000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG 2,000,000 OTHER: • AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1-O-�000 i n $ BODILY INJURY Perperson) $ AUTO Y SPP6175204 07/18/2019 07/18/2020 BODILY INJURY Per accident $ IANY OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED �( NON- WNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Perr accident AMAGE $ A UMBRELLALIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS -MADE SPP6175204 07/18/2019 07/18/2020 DED I X I RETENTION$ 0 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE F—] OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) NIA N I A PER OTH- TAT E R EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below B Errors & Omissions PHSD1358363 07/18/2019 07/18/2020 Limit 1,000,000 Claims Made DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) The city of Burlingame, it's officials, employees, and volunteers are added as additional insured as respects their contract with the insured, subject to policy terms, definitions, conditions & exclusions. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION ACORD 25 (2016/03) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD CITYBUA SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN The City of Burlinghame ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Date Issued 07/02,19 Business Description Business Name Burlingame Location EXHIBIT A J 'TAX RECEIPT ww.burlingame.org Expiration Date 06/30/20 Business License Number 29932 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING THE EDCCO GROUP, INC Owners Name ERIC DANIEL PLEASE PAST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE NOT ASSIGNABLE: 0 TRA NSFE'RA131 E fhis tax certificate is issued for revenue purposes only and is not a permit or approval to operate a business in violation of City, County, State or federal laws. Before conducting any business, the business owner should check with the City Building, fire, Planning Departments and the County of San Mateo Health Department for limitations and requirements, This license is issued without Nerilication that the license is subject to or exempt from licensing by the State of California or the County of San Mateo. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH TELSTAR INSTRAMENTS, INC THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2019, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the "City", and Telstar Instruments, Inc. engaged in providing Supervisory Control and Data Acquistion (SCADA) services herein called the "Consultant". RECITALS A. The City is considering conducting activities for consultant services for electrical instrumentation/control engineering, SCADA programming and support, and pump station diagnostics. B. The City desires to engage a professional consultant to provide scheduled service calls, hardware & software upgrades, and server maintenance; communication failure investigations, historian data loss recoveries, and hardware failures analysis; ongoing system analysis in order to recommend, design and implement system wide upgrades and improvements because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to perform the desired work, described in Exhibit A. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide professional services such as scheduled service calls, hardware & software upgrades, server maintenance, system analysis, recommend, design and implement system wide upgrades and improvementsfor the departments SCADA system and as detailed in "Scope of Services" of the attached Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement with completion of all work by December 31, 2022. Page 1 of 8 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed $100,000 per year; and payment shall be based upon City approval of each task. Billing shall include current period and cumulative expenditures to date and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only in partial or draft form. Page 2 of 8 7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Michael Heathcote, Streets, Storm Drains & Sewer Division Manager. 9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to: To City: Kevin Dawdy City of Burlingame 1361 N Carolan Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 To Consultant: Ms. Tammy Misenhimer Telstar Instruments, Inc. 1717 Solano Way, Unit 34 Concord, CA 94520 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Page 3 of 8 Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever any such employment relationship. 13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act. 14. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: One million dollars Page 4 of 8 91 ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage in a form at least as broad as ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each claim/aggregate sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. iv. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. General and Automobile Liability Policies: i. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or used by the Consultant. The endorsement providing this additional insured coverage shall be equal to or broader than ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint negligence, completed operations, and the acts of subcontractors. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurances Page 5 of 8 maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees. D. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by mail, has been given to the City (10 days for non-payment of premium). Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. E. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A -:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California. F. Verification of Coverage: Upon execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be on forms approved by the City. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City, its officers, employees, Page 6 of 8 authorized agents and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from, relate to, or be set up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant. This provision shall not apply if the damage or injury is caused by the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers. 16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo. 18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Page 7 of 8 Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1). City of Burlingame Lisa K. Goldman City Manager Approved as to form: City Attorney — Kathleen Kane ATTEST: City Clerk - Meaghan Hassel -Shearer "Consultant" Consultant Name Print Name: Title: Page 8 of 8 TELSTAK"AJ!7- I N S T R U M E N T S EXHIBIT A Contractor License #422364 Contractor DIR #1000000899 CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE October 30, 2019 City of Burlingame 1361 N. Carolan Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Sent via Email: mheathcote@burlingame.org Attn: Mike Heathcote Subject: Water Service Rates for 2019-2020 Fiscal Year Dear Mike, Below is a full breakdown of our service rates for the upcoming fiscal year. These rates are good from October 28, 2019 through November 1, 2020. Chemical Feed/OSG Services....................................................................................................... $156.00/hr Journeyman Instrumentation Technician.................................................................................... $154.00/hr California Certified Electrician (Prevailing Wage subject to change on determination date)...... $146.00/hr PLC/SCADA-HMI Programming.................................................................................................... $179.00/hr Sr. Engineer (registered CA Professional Engineer)...................................................................... $196.00/hr Travel time (portal to portal).......................................................................................................... $99.00/hr Vehicle Usage/Test Equipment/Tool charge..............................................................................$185.00/day Fuel Surcharge (After average gas price exceed $3.00/gallon)...................................... 33% of Vehicle Cost MaterialMark-up......................................................................................................................Cost plus 20% PerDiem if required..................................................................................................................Cost plus 12% Note: Standard overtime rates apply Notes: a. Travel is included to 30 miles. Over 30 miles from the Concord shop is billed at the above rates. b. Overtime is anything after 8 hours Monday -Friday. Saturdays are billed at 1.5 up to 8 hours. Sundays and all hours after 12 hours in a day is double time. c. Service calls and time and materials rates carry a 4 -hour minimum per person, time over 4 hours is charged as 8 hours. d. Telstar provides 24-hour service seven days a week. Our normal response time is within 48 hours. 1717 Solano Way, Unit 34, Concord, CA 94520 Phone 925-671-2888, Fax 925-671-9507 4017 Vista Park Court, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone 916-646-1999, Fax 916-646-1096 202 South Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230 Phone 559-584-7116, Fax 559-584-8028 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A T E Lb" TA R-"*--�- I N S T R U M E N T S Contractor License #422364 Contractor DIR #1000000899 CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Provide Chemical Feed & OSG maintenance services on an as -needed basis. 2. Provide Instrument calibration, troubleshooting, and maintenance on an as -needed basis. Telstar recommends most instrumentation be calibrated annually or semi-annually. 3. Provide electrical troubleshooting and maintenance services on an as -needed basis. Telstar recommends most electrical equipment be inspected and cleaned annually. 4. Provide PLC, HMI, and SCADA programming services on an as -needed basis. 5. Provide engineering and radio systems troubleshooting and maintenance on an as -needed basis. 6. Provide the City with engineering and consultation services relating to improvements and upgrades. 7. Provide training to City Staff on an as -needed basis. 8. Provide recommendations for software and hardware upgrades on an as -needed basis. Please contact me at 916-646-1999 if you have any questions or need to schedule services. Sincerely, Kyle Johnsen Telstar Instruments (916) 646-1999 1717 Solano Way, Unit 34, Concord, CA 94520 Phone 925-671-2888, Fax 925-671-9507 4017 Vista Park Court, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone 916-646-1999, Fax 916-646-1096 202 South Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230 Phone 559-584-7116, Fax 559-584-8028 Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 From: Kathleen Kane, City Attorney — (650) 558-7204 AGENDA NO: MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 Subject: Introduction of an Ordinance Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products, Including Vaping Liquids RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council consider introduction of an ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco products, including vaping liquids. In order to do so, Council should: A. Receive the staff report and ask any questions of staff. B. Request that the City Clerk read the title of the proposed ordinance. C. By motion, waive further reading and introduce the ordinance. D. Conduct a public hearing. E. Following the public hearing, discuss the ordinance and determine whether to bring it back for second reading and adoption. If the Council is in favor of the ordinance, direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before its proposed adoption. BACKGROUND and DISCUSSION Flavored tobacco products have been identified as a significant threat to public health. In particular, the prevalence of vaping has radically increased among teenagers in recent years, with over 37 per cent of twelfth graders stating they had used e -cigarettes in the prior twelve months, up ten per cent over the prior year. See, e.g., National Institutes of Health, "Teens Using Vaping Devices in Record Numbers", Dec. 17, 2018, reporting on the Monitoring the Future survey conducted in 2018 (although daily use is relatively low). This trend is potentially dangerous because the adolescent brain appears to be uniquely sensitive to nicotine, which may have both acute and long-term effects on the neurobiology of users, including modifying the dopamine system in a way that increases the risk of future addictive tendencies. See Nicotine and the Adolescent Brain, Yuan, M, Cross, S., et al., Journal of Physiology, 2015 Aug 15; 593 (Pt. 16): 3397-3412. While we lack rigorous survey data, parents and administrators at Burlingame High School and Burlingame Intermediate School have reported a significant rise in the use of vaping products by the youth they serve. Several jurisdictions, including San Francisco and San Mateo County, have moved to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products in an effort to stem the tide of new, particularly teenage, users. An effort at the state level to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products stalled when hostile amendments caused the bill's author to withdraw it. With thq spate of recent hospitalizations linked to vaping in the news, the federal government announced that it plans to restrict the sale of e- 1 Ban On Sale of Flavored Tobacco and Vaping Liquids November 4, 2019 cigarettes, though the actual dimensions of such a move remain unclear at this time. If a federal rule were to go into effect, it could preempt state and local regulation of the products. Preemption is not a given, however, but instead depends on how the eventual rule is drafted. The FDA has never conducted "pre -market" analysis on vaping liquids and e -cigarettes. It indicated in September, however, that it would be engaging in that effort and enforcing against the marketing of vaping devices and liquids that had not been cleared. The FDA stated at that time that it would be releasing rules and enforcement measures within a few weeks, but as of the writing of this staff report, no such action had yet taken place. In the absence of FDA action, the Council may consider the attached proposed ordinance as a stop gap measure to mitigate the impacts of flavored tobacco and vaping on Burlingame's youth. The ordinance bans the sale of flavored tobacco products, including flavored nicotine -containing vaping liquids, within Burlingame as well as delivery of such items to Burlingame addresses. If and when the FDA or another federal agency takes action regarding flavored tobacco/vaping products, the Council can review the attached ordinance and determine if it should be amended or rescinded. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact on the City General Fund. Exhibit: • Proposed Ordinance 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 8.18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD PROVISIONS BANNING THE SALE OF FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS WHEREAS, studies have shown that flavored tobacco products are frequently the first tobacco product used by new - and especially young - users; and WHEREAS, the use of flavored tobacco products has been documented to induce migration to smoking and nicotine addiction; and WHEREAS, since their introduction in 2007, e -cigarettes have not been subjected to or completed "pre -market' review by the federal Food and Drug Administration; and WHEREAS, both nationally and within Burlingame, there has been a radical and well-documented rise in the use of e -cigarettes by minors; and WHEREAS, studies have shown that repeated exposure of developing brains to nicotine can have long-term negative consequences for health and cognition; and WHEREAS, efforts at the state and federal level to regulate flavored tobacco products effectively, including e -cigarettes and vaping liquids, have thus far failed while youth use continues to rise. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: DIVISION 1: Section 1: Burlingame Municipal Code Chapter 8.18 is amended to add the following: "Section 8.18.120: Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Prohibited (a) Definitions: for the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall govern unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (1 )"Characterizing flavor" means a distinguishable taste or aroma or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Characterizing flavors include, but are not limited to, tastes or aroma relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. A tobacco product shall not be determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information. Rather, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, as described in the first sentence of this definition, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. (2)"Constituent' means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product. (3)"Distinguishable" means perceivable by either the sense of smell or taste. (4)"Flavored tobacco product' means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. (5)"Labeling" means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon any tobacco product or any of its packaging. (6)"Packaging" means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind or, if no other container, any wrapping (including cellophane) in which a tobacco product is sold, or offered for sale, to a consumer. (7)"Tobacco product' means any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, including any electronic device that delivers nicotine or other substances to the person inhaling from the device, including, but not limited to, an electronic cigarette, electronic cigar, electronic pipe, or electronic hookah and the nicotine -containing liquids manufactured for use in such devices. (8)"Tobacco retailer" means any store, stand, booth, concession or any other enterprise — including an online or e-commerce vendor -- that engages in the retail sale of tobacco products, including but not limited to stores that engage in the retail sale of food items. (b) Sale or offer for sale of flavored tobacco products prohibited. (1) The sale or offer for sale within the City of Burlingame, including a sale transacted remotely with delivery to an address within Burlingame, by any person or tobacco retailer of any flavored tobacco product is prohibited and no person or tobacco retailer shall sell, or offer for sale, any flavored tobacco product. (2) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer's agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor including, but not limited to, text, color, and/or images on the product's labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. (c) Enforcement; Violation a public nuisance. The provisions of this Section shall be enforced through the mechanisms provided in Title 1 of this Code, and violations may be subject to administrative, civil, or criminal remedies as determined within the discretion of the City Attorney as prosecutor. Violation of the provisions of this Section is deemed to constitute a public nuisance and may be abated as such. Further, violation of this Section shall constitute grounds for revocation of a violator's business license under Section 6.04.280. (d) No conflict with state or federal law. Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any requirement, power, or duty that is preempted by federal or state law. DIVISION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. DIVISION 3: This Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933, published, and circulated in the City of Burlingame, and shall be in full force and effect on April 1, 2020. Donna Colson, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of November, 2019, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO: 10a To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 MEETING DATE: November 4, 2019 From: Ana Maria Silva, Executive Assistant — (650) 558-7204 Subject: Consideration of Two Appointments to the Beautification Commission RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council make appointments to fill two impending vacancies on the Beautification Commission or take other action. BACKGROUND The vacancies are due to the expiring terms of Commissioners Qiva Dinuri and Anne Hinckle. The vacancies were publicized, and notification letters were sent to past Commission applicants. The City received applications from Qiva Dinuri, Anne Hinckle, and Marcia Bauer as of the deadline of October 4, 2019, and the City Council interviewed the applicants on October 22, 2019. The appointee terms will be for three years, ending on October 7, 2022. 1 OU B....INGAME STAFF REPORT AGENDA NO: 10b -0 MEETING DATE. November 4, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: November 4, 2019 From: Ana Maria Silva, Executive Assistant — (650) 558-7204 Subject: Consideration of One Appointment to the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council make an appointment to fill one impending vacancy on the Traffic, Safety and Commission or take other action. BACKGROUND The vacancy is due to the expiring term of Commissioner John Martos. The vacancy was publicized, and notification letters were sent to past Commission applicants. The City received applications from John Martos and James Lico as of the deadline of October 11, 2019, and the City Council interviewed both applicants on October 22, 2019. The appointee term will be for three years, ending on November 6, 2022. 7 kBURLINGAME Memorandum WLI� III W�C�) To: City Council Date: November 4, 2019 From: Mayor Donna Colson Subject: Committee Report October 22, 2109 Ground Breaking Lots FN • Celebration of the groundbreaking for Lots FN both the parking garage and the affordable housing project. About 100 people in attendance and thank you to the sponsoring groups. TSP, Parks & Recreation and Beautification Interviews Many strong candidates October 24, 2019 • State of the State address by Dan Morain and CalMatters • $20 billion budget excess - focus on one time, schools Expect more on housing - probably a refinement of the rent control measures and even more funding for housing, continued state wrestling away from local control • More on PGE wildfires - how to manage this institution • GIG workers legislation will continue to be big topic October 24, 2019 Peninsula Clean Energy Board Meeting • Approve adding new Commercial TOU (Time of Use) rate schedules • Approve PCE rate adjustment to maintain 5% discount across all rate schedules with full discretion between 4-6% • Approve moving forward to develop a three-year $10 million plan for local electricity resiliency programs • Approve contract for up to $850,000 with the Center for Sustainable Energy to administer PCE electric vehicle incentive funds of up to $12 million as part of CALeVIP October 25, 2019 City/School District Liaison Meeting • Overview and update on the Hoover Access work • Possible doing a meeting with PTA Colson Committee Report Green Mondays • Will share with Gaby so she can evaluate • Maybe presentation to PTA Council Workforce Housing Brainstorming about this issue and how we can work together Crossing Guards • Better training and process for how to report absences • Franklin, Lincoln and Washington are the worst School Resource Officer November 4, 2019 Discussion of if we might increase this SRO position and how to fund October 28, 2019 Burlingame Public Plaza Scoping Project • Met with consultant to discuss revised project scope and new USPO ownership structure • Set up new process and working to determine how to best set up a critical path toward developing a plan and then engaging council and public. Park and Recreation Meeting • Successful Fall Festival event raised about $1,000. • Writing $20,000 check to City to pay for bayside equipment • Participation in the Tree Lightning and the holiday parade • Will have strategic planning in January BNN Download from City • BNN did an excellent download on the October drill event. • Major issues was just low turnout so there was discussion about hosting this event at another time to include more families. Overall, well executed and feedback was excellent. Connect19 Tech and the impacts on the modern city. Excellent presenters including discussions on changing face of the workforce including global pension and retirement issues, 21 st century skills and the future workforce needs, changing nature of business (gig economy), global population growth. Also interesting work by UrbanFootPrint group especially on why SB50 will not work and lead to increased affordable and workforce housing. Impacts on environment and other resources, water, energy, VMT and emissions. Also discussion on transit and the future of cities 2 Colson Committee Report • Worth attending this year - better than last year. October 30, 2019 Home For All Funding Task Force November 4, 2019 • Work on the funding task force - set dates for next three meetings • Extensive discussion about the laying of funding and how to leverage the county contributions • Discussion about work on HEART 3