Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 072-2001Recording Requested by: Ann T. Musso, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 When Recorded Mail to: Ann T. Musso, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 DOC ss 200 1-1 10820 07/23/2001 09:14A R1 Fee:NC Page 1 of 3 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-Ccunty Clerk -Recorder Recorded By IIIIII IIIII 111111i IIIII III 111111111111111111111111 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY TITLE OF DOCUMENT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, SIDE SETBACK VARAIANCE, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 1524 Los Montes Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 APN 027-046-090 RESOLUTION NO,72-2001 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desien review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story addition at 1524 Los Montes Avenue zoned R-1 Michael Berman and Betsy Haugh property owner, APN- 027-046-090; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on June 11, 2000 at which time said application was denied-, WHEREAS, this matter was apppealed to City Council_ and a hearing thereon held on July 2, 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said design review, sidesetback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. IIII�III IIIIIII IIIIII IIII IIII III VIII IIII III 200 02 0 09 l 0820 OR I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE= ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 1. NONE CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO.72-2001 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope, and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story addition at 1524 Los Montes Avenue, zoned R-1, Michael Berman and Betsy Haugh, property owner, APN: 027-046-090; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on June 11, 2000 at which time said application was denied; WHEREAS, this matter was apppealed to City Council_ and a hearing thereon held on July 2, 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and continents received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said design review, sidesetback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction permit are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. OR I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2"a day of July, 2001, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE' ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ✓� c�/y� CITY CLERK EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, design review, side setback variance, special permit for declining height envelope and hillside area construction pen -nit. 1524 LOS MONTES DRIVE effective July 2, 2001 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 31, 2001, Sheets AO through A5, site plan, floor plans and building elevations; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the second floor, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's May 5, 2001 memos shall be met; and 4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.