Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - PC - 2017.10.23CITY O p ipQRATED , Monday, October 23, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda Planning Commission 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Planning Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Planning Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although the provision of a name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each; the Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 6. STUDY ITEMS 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. 8. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS a. 1357 Columbus Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Section 15303 (a). (Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer; Steven F. Baldwin and Therese M. Baldwin TR, property owners) (60 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1357 Columbus Ave - Staff Report 1357 Columbus Ave - Attachments 1357 Columbus Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 1011912017 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda October 23, 2017 b. 1411 De Soto Avenue. zoned R-1 - ADDlication for Desian Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e)(2). (Scott and Leanne Duong, applicant and property owners; Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Architecture, architect) (57 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1411 De Soto Ave. - Staff Report 1411 De Soto Ave. -Attachments 1411 De Soto Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 C. 852 Paloma Avenue. zoned R-1 - ADDlication for Desian Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e)(2).(Jesse Geurse, applicant and designer; Rick Lund, property owner) (68 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 852 Paloma Ave - Staff Report.pdf 852 Paloma Ave - Attachments 852 Paloma Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 d. 300 Airport Boulevard, zoned APN - Application for Amendment of the Design Review approval of an office/life science development ("Burlingame Point") (Genzon Investment Group, applicant; Burlingame Point LLC, property owner; Gensler, Architect) (23 noticed) Staff Contact: Kevin Gardiner Attachments: 300 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 300 Airport Blvd - Attachments 300 Airport Blvd - Plans - 10.23.17 9. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY a. 1355 Laguna Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (Joann Gann, applicant and designer; Ryan and Wendy Vance, property owners) (70 noticed) Staff contact: Catherine Keylon Attachments: 1355 Laguna Ave - Staff Report and Attachments 1355 Laguna Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 b. 521 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Patrick R. Gilson, applicant and property owner; Stewart Associates, architect) (56 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 521 Burlingame Ave - Staff Report 521 Burlingame Ave - Attachments 521 Burlingame Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1011912017 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda October 23, 2017 C. 21 Park Road, zoned BMU - Application for Design Review and Condominium Permit for a new 3-story, 7-unit residential condominium building (Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect; GGH Investment LLC, property owner) (79 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 21 Park Rd - Staff Report 21 Park Rd - Attachments 21 Park Rd - Plans - 10.23.17 10. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS 11. DIRECTOR REPORTS - Commission Communications - City Council regular meeting October 16, 2017 2209 Ray Drive - FYI for review of proposed changes to a previously approved Design Review project. Attachments: 2209 Ray Dr - FYI 12. ADJOURNMENT Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on October 23, 2017. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on November 2, 2017, the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $533, which includes noticing costs. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Community Development/Planning counter, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 1011912017 Item No. 8a Regular Action Item PROJECT LOCATION 1357 Columbus Avenue City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permit Address: 1357 Columbus Avenue Item No. 8a Regular Action Item Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for anew, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Chu Design Associates Property Owner: Steven F. Baldwin TR General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-153-070 Lot Area: 6,000 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing one-story house and detached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house will have a total floor area of 3,414 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemption). The new single family dwelling will contain four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on -site. One covered parking space is provided in the detached garage (11'-0" x 22'-0" clear interior dimensions); one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. The proposed storage area within the detached garage is permitted as long as it does not exceed 10% of the area of the house (154 SF proposed where 300 SF is allowed). The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Permit for the overall building height as measured from the average top of curb level along Columbus Avenue to the highest roof ridge (3l'-9" proposed where 30'-0" is allowed with a Special Permit). Planning staff would note that the finished floor of the house is 4'-7" above the average top of curb (see Proposed Front Elevation on sheet A.4). The area of the roof that extends above 30'-0" is at the center peak of the house. The applicant is requesting the following applications: ■ Design Review for anew, two-story single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)); and ■ Special Permit for building height between 30 and 36 feet (31'-9" proposed) (C.S. 25.26.060 (a) (1)). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue 1357 Columbus Avenue Lot Area: b,000 5F Plans date stamped: Uctober b, 2U1 I PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1st fir): 22'-1'/2" 18-0" (block average) (2nd fir): 22'-1'/2" 20'-0" .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Side (left): 10'-0" 4'-0" (right): .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4'-0" 4'-0" Rear (1st fir): 44'-10" 15-0' (2nd fir): .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44'-10" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2034 SF 2400 SF 34% 40% .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... FAR: 3414 SF 3420 SF' 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered 1 covered (11' x 22' clear interior) (10' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................:......................................................................................................... Building Height: 31'-9" 2 30'41 DH Envelope: complies CS 25.26.075 1 (0.32 x 6000 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3420 SF (0.57 FAR) 2 Special Permit required for building height (31'-9" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed). Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on September 25, 2017, the Commission had several suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached September 25, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a letter and revised plans dated October 5, 2017, in responses to the Commission's comments. Please refer to the letter and revised plans for a detailed summary of changes made to the project since the design review study meeting. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 1►� Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the structure, featuring a front covered porch, a combination of shingle siding, board and batten siding, and horizontal wood siding, articulated first and second floor walls, aluminum clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites, wood trim, composition shingle roofing, and a combination of hip and gable roofs is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood; that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties; and that the proposed landscape plan incorporates plants, hedges and trees at locations so that they help to provide privacy and compatible with the existing neighborhood, the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) The variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Suggested Special Permit Findings: That because the subject property slopes up from the street with a difference of approximately 4'-7" between the average top of curb and finish floor of the house and the building height is measured from the average top of curb elevation, it results in an overall taller roof height and causes the roof of the house to extend to 31'-9" above average top of curb level; that the encroachment above the 30' height limit is comprised of a pitched roof at the center peak of the house with minimal impact to the appearance of bulk and mass, the project may be found to be compatible with the special permit criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct public hearing on the application, and consider public testimonyand the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearlyforthe record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 5, 2017 sheets A.1 through A.6, N.2, L1.0 and L2.0; 2. that anychanges to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof heightorpitch, and amount ortype of hardscape materials shall be subjectto Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 3 Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes ordumpsters forthe construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that priorto issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a coversheet listing all conditions of approval adopted bythe Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; anypartial orfull demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE METDURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIORTO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. that priorto scheduling thefoundation inspection, a licensed surveyorshall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certifythe firstfloor elevation of the newstructure(s) based on the elevation atthe top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification thatthe architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident atframing, such as window locations and bays, are builtas shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall besubmitted tothe Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that priorto scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyorshall shootthe heightof the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verifythat the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 4 Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer Steven F. Baldwin TR, property owner Attachments: September 25, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter, dated October 5, 2017 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 13, 2017 Planning Commission Resolutions (Proposed) Aerial Photo k Monday, September 25, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers a. 1357 Columbus Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer; Steven F. Baldwin and Therese M. Baldwin TR, property owners) (60 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1357 Columbus Ave - Staff Report 1357 Columbus Ave - Attachments 1357 Columbus Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the site. Commissioner Terrones had an email exchange with the neighbors at 1359 Columbus Avenue regarding the landscaping. Commissioner Gum spoke with the neighbors at 1359 and 1353 Columbus Avenue. i Senior Planner Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of Staff.- > Is a building section required to be included in the plans for a new house? (Hurin: Not required but it is typically provided. It can be requested of the applicant.) Chair Gum opened the public hearing. Steven Baldwin represented the applicant, with designer James Chu. Commission Questions/Comments: > Per the letter from the neighbors at 1359 Columbus Avenue, is there possibility of adding additional taller landscaping along the side? > Revisit the stairwell window to see if there is a way to work something in to reduce the impacts on the neighboring property such as a tall hedge or tree. There is some area with the setbacks, since a lot of the wall is pulled in more than the required 4 feet. > Front porch height seems high. The posts look tall and gangly. Could bring the plate height down on the front of the porch to 8 feet, which would also help the second floor windows with more freeboard below the sill. Gutter and eave do not need to align with the top of the belly band - could align or fall just underneath it. > A railing would help the porch. (Baldwin: There will be a railing on the porch that fits with the craftsman style.) > Special Permit is from upsloping lot, which causes the house to be taller. The back patio doors are aligned with the rear grade. > Rear and side of the garage would be plywood, but there is only 1 foot between the garage and the fence. Concerned with maintenance. Consider moving the garage further out so there is room to maintain it? (Baldwin: Fence could stop at the garage in the rear.) > The Special Permit application mentions a metal roof. (Chu: No metal roof is proposed.) > On the right side the fence has suffered since the pittosporum was removed. (Baldwin: Has been City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 912712017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 25, 2017 coordinating with the neighbors and will build a new fence. Would prefer the fence go the full extent of the property line, past the neighboring garage.) > If the fence is being replaced it should be indicated on the plans. (Baldwin: Will probably happen sooner than the house would be built.) Public Comments: None. Chair Gum closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Nicely crafted project. > Applicant should consider the suggestions made by the commission to improve the project. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Gum, Gaul, Terrones, Sargent, Loftis, and Comaroto Absent: 1 - Kelly City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 912712017 1 UMrne Lesi'gn a n6ief°lCt October 5, 2017 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Rd Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: New residence at .1357 Columbus Ave. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Planning Commissioner: F za =: R I= A" f E D � " '", . I �, OCT- 5 2017 CITY OF S7.11 s r a .I A E r�� "y `M;Jtl �E y�.. �J�tl "ay5 �iy�d6pw Per your design review comments, we have made the following changes to the new proposed two story residence at 1357 Columbus Ave., Burlingame. 1. The front porch has been lower by 12 inches. 2. Existing fence on left side and rear property lines has ended at new garage. Please see site and landscape plan. 3. More privacy screening trees are added along the right side setback area. Thank you for your time in reviewing the revised plan. Sincerely, James Chu Chu Design 55 West 43rd Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Phone: (650)345-9286 Fax: (650)345-9287 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT * 601 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 660.668.7260 - f: 660.696.3790 - www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ® Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ PROJECT ADDRESS: 1357 COLUMBUS AVE. APPLICANT Name: CHU DESIGN ASSOCIATES Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: james@chudesign.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: JAM ES CH U Address: 55 W. 43RD AVE. City/State/Zip: SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Phone: 650-345-9286 x104 E-mail: james@chudesign.com Burlingame Business License #: 22684 Parcel #: 027-153-070 Zoning / Other: PROPERTY OWNER Name: MR. STEVE BALDWIN Address: 1357 COLUMBUS AVE. City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME CA 94010 Phone: 415- 7/6 - �zc;o E-mail: sbaldwin@citybuilding.com AY 12 E' CITY OF BURLINGAME CBD-PLANNING DIV Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. ic (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW TWO-STORY RESIDENCE W/ DETACHED 1-CAR GARAGE AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: I am aware of the proposed application and uthorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: �2 �7 Date submitted: 5 -12. 1 I-7 S: �HANDOUTS�PCApplication.doc City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org CITY OFBURI,II�TGAME; SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CEIVED CITY OF BURLING ME The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's OrdinanWPa,0.NNIN(3 DI'V. Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. The proposed new two-story country farm house inspired residence with single car -detached garage is consistent with existing detached garage and surrounding properties that have similar garage patterns, mass, and scale on the "west" side of Burlingame neighborhood. Due to the up sloped condition (5 to 6 feet difference in elevation between front & rear property line), the special permit is required to allow the building height to exceed 30 feet from average top of the curb but still within 35'-0" max. allowable height. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. The proposed country farm house dwelling is located within a variety of styles neighborhood. The low pitch metal roof, combination of shingle/stone/wood siding material, and front porch are all consistent with this style and it should blend well on this block without changing the character of the neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? The proposed single-family residence with detached garage is consistent with City Design Review Guidelines, and it complies with all zoning requirements, except for the building height (Special permit). 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. No trees will be removed with new landscaping proposed for the entire lot. SPECPERMIRM RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for a new, two story single family house and a detached garage at 1357 Columbus Avenue, Zoned R-1, Steven F. Baldwin TR, property owner, APN: 027-153- 070; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 23, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 5, 2017 sheets A.1 through A.6, N.2, 1-1.0 and 1-2.0; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIORTO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit 1357 Columbus Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 Page 2 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. aCITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1357 COLUMBUS AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1357 COLUMBUS AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 027-153-070 Mailed: October 13, 2017 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) 2�10 S ^ ^ r h p ¢ f V/ 41 _ ti 6 ry G r . 0 %If °fir Tq'cb , #'9L'W'b a a8 �4a Cyr . ' 2 Or^ � �! r, qo T * �y Vao — — �- - � f ^ A� s2 s8�•��� ! _ tit_ '` ..i`+., .r _ .. ELA5WTOMERIC SHEET WATERPROOFING EXTED A5 NOTED SLOPE METAL FLASHING WITH DRIP EXTEND 4" MIN ABOVE CEDAR WOOD TRIM PER ELEVATION WINDOW FRAME HEAD WINDOW FRAME SEALANT WOOD TRIM PER ELEVATION ELASHTOMERIC SHEET WATERPROOFING EXTED 45 NOTED SILL TYP. HEAD + SILL DETAIL SCALE: T T—On GYP. BD, HEADER PER PLAN DBL 2x SILL 2x BLOCKING OMIT AT PLYWD.5HEARWALL GYP, BD. TOP OF RIDGE +124.66 J� TOP PLATE 19-1 UPPER FLOOR PLATE LEVEL MAIN FLOOR EL. +9150 TOP OF RIDGE EL. +124.66 TOP PLATE IRV UPPER FLOOR PLATE LEVEL MAIN FLOOR EL. +9150 D.H.E. 96.35 = 90.10+94.60 2 V1i 1-1VL 11- y lll-w ALUMINUM GLAD WOOD CASEMENT WINDOW W/ 2x WOOD TRIM, DUAL GLAZING TYP. C.CJLuMN, I T I-. t�ALUSItK t:NITAT VUUK W1 4x WOOD TRIM FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" I u--- rl—hv i 11 viviv>=v ,y1_uriuNui-i CLAD WOOD CASEMENT WINDOW W/ 2x WOOD TRIM, DUAL GLAZING TYP, WATERTAE$LE TRIM, I TYP, I I I (E) BASEMENT L---------- —� TYPE VENEER LEGEND EE = EMERGENCY EGRESS REVISIONS BY PLANNING PU PLANNING 10/05/17 PU [� 7t Z W Z j o0ooc �UW� tt M 0 3 CIO -5 a�'> wCIO W4 mow(Z) Z o Q A w Y z �Q 0 o c wcon a> Q +r UO ct t> o O U N cU � rn N 3 G 110 _ R A C +� a O g a> a o 3 tb al .a? CIS o a> aJ. W ^Q w�� Q DATE: AUG. 2016 SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN: Pm JOB: SHEET NO. A.4 OF SHEETS TOP OF RIDGE EL. +124.66 TOP PLATE UPPER FLOOR PLATE LEVEL MAIN FLOOR EL. +97.50 TOP OF RIDGE EL. +124fo6 Ji TOP PLATE 19-1 UPPER FLOOR PLATE LEVEL MAIN FLOOR EL. +91.50 311 WOOD RAFTER TAILS BOARD AND BATTEN TYPE SIDING 12" PAINTED BAND SHINGLE, TYP. TYP. ROOF PITCH /`/lMo CI IAA I/.I CC SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD CASEMENT WINDOW W/ 2x WOOD TRIM, DUAL GLAZING TYP. STONE VENEER MuVL/ .�7J_ILJIIVC� Llul"fl I I/,Il.fl\L, Ln I 1'9II7I♦_y/ DOORS 40 WATTS MAX. WATERTA5LE TRIM, TYP, REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=l'-0" WOOD LATTICE VENT, TYP. COMP. SHINGLES ROOFING, TYP. ADHERED 6x12 WOOD STONE VENEER COR5EL5 LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=l'-0" WOOD SIDING (o" EXPOSURE, TYP. 6x12 WOOD OUTRIGGERS, F TYP- 2x 1011 SQ, WOOD WATERTA51-E COLUMN, TYP. TRIM, TYP, LEGEND EE = EMERGENCI' EGRESS REVISIONS BY PLANNING PU PLANNING 10/05/17 PU V rr� 1 IrV l o O con 0000 tt M 0 I CIS 3 ;~ 72 w s W v, EJ!z E Z o C,3 Q W Y Q 0 oow= �� ���10 O ct , t> - o N �, U O J� N Q � rn N (D 3 (•-'I "� W ^Q a DATE: AUG. 2016 SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN: PMU JOB: SHEET NO. A05 OF SHEETS WOOD SIDING 6" EXPOSURE, TYP. WOOD LATTICE VENT, TYP• 12 61 6x12 WOOD OUTRIGGERS, TYP. Ilia VAN miIN11 pal 10 m mm u� 1 LIGHT FIXTURE, J 40 WATTS MAX. FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=F-0" w- ♦ 1 "1 WV BLIND -WALL LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=F-0" '' I— e 1-1, 1- , 11 V 1♦ 1 V I wV REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=F-0" 1un I I 1,� 1 ui�, vrlll .�.rtiti, 1 1 i. a_Z' WATTS MAX. RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=F-0" -O" REAR cA SETBACK N 2m'-8" GARAGE FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" N REVISIONS BY PLANNIN8/10/17G PU V o � o z �Daocoo Z W W �OMM .n-�I-1 g, W • > Nz U 1.1-C_�til z� �w era � ` 05 COD o w 8 c o 0 2 O L U -CS O ?+tir R o w a�i �• L CIS Uj i 4 A t N 4 3 c y � C 0 3 C13 o a�i Q-1 O 45 �- y 9 v U W DATE: AUG. 2016 SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN: PMU JOB: SHEET NO. A06 OF SHEETS GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAIL INFORMATION 2. MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED FIFTEEN (15) PERCENT AT ANY POINT WITHOUT SPECIAL APPROVAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS± SLOPES IN EXCESS OF TWENTY (20) PERCENT SHALL REQUIRE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. TRANSITIONAL SLOPES ARE REQUIRED FOR DRIVEWAYS WHICH EXCEED TEN (10) PERCENT MAXIMUM SLOPE. NO TRANSITIONAL SLOPE SHALL EXTEND INTO A REQUIRED PARKING SPACE. 3, TOPOGRAPHY IS PREPARED BY- W.E.C. 8 ASSOCIATES 2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #658 BPALO ALTO, CA 94306 TEL. (650) 823-6466 4. A DEMOLITION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK, SEWER AND WATER REPLACEMENT 5. REQUIRED PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO DEMO PERMIT ISSUE. 6. SEWER BACKFLOW PROTECTION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED PER ORDINANCE NO. 1110, A DRAFT CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 1. THE SURVEYOR RECOMMENDS THE CITY VERIFY THAT THE PERTINENT RESIDENCES WERE USED IN THE CALCULATION. 8_ GARAGE FOOTING SHALL NOT EXTEND INTO ONE FOOT SETBACK WITHOUT A LICENCED SURVEY AND FIELD STAKING REVIEWED BY INSPECTOR 9. NEW WATER METER SHALL NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. IT MUCH BE LOCATED ON PUBLIC PROPERTY FOR ACCESS BY METER READER 10. NEW SEWER LINE WITH CLEANOUT FOR NEW HOUSE. CLEANOUT AT SEWER MAIN LINE TO BE IN PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR CITY ACCESS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE DOUBLE VALE ASSEMBLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY A SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVED CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SCHEDULING WATER DEPARTMENT FINAL. 12. PROVIDE ADEQUATE FIRE FLOW BASED UPON CONSTRUCTION AND SIZE OF BUILDING, SEE UFC APPENDIX IIIA. MINIMUM 500 GPM REQUIRED, SEE TABLE NO. A-III-A-1, 13, MINIMUM P WATER METER REQUIRED 14, IF BACKWATER PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM OF THE BUILDING SEWER INCLUDING ALL BACKWATER VALVES, RELIEF VALVES, AND ANY SEWER INJECTION SYSTEM DETAILS. CITY OF BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE 1110. 15, PROVIDE SURVEY STAKES PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION TO VERIFY LOT LINES. 16. PROVIDE A PRESSURE ABSORBING DEVICES OR APPROVED MECHANICAL DEVICES ARE REQUIRED ON WATER LINES, LOCATED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO QUICK ACTING VALVES, THAT WILL ABSORB NIGH PRESSURES RESULTING FROM QUICK CLOSING OF QUICK -ACTING VALVES. CPC 5ECTION609.10 PUBLIC UJORK NOTES 4 CONDITIONS. L A REMOVE/REPLACE UTILITIES ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED- • REPLACE ALL CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK FRONTING SITE. • PLUG ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND INSTALL A NEW 6" LATERAL. • ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITYWATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATION. • ANY OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORKS WITHIN CITY'S RIGHT OF WAY. 2. THE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL (BUILDING SEWER) SHALL BE TESTED PER ORDINANCE CODE CHAPTER 15.12. TESTING INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTER AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WHENEVER THE CITY'S PORTION OF THE SEWER LATERAL OR CITY CLEANOUT IS TO BE LAID AND/OR CONNECTED TO THE SEWER MAINS. 3. SEWER BACKWATER PROTECTION CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW SEWER FIXTURE PER ORDINANCE NO. 1110. 4. ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE PROTECTION ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT FOR CONNECTION FEES. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE CITY'$ RIGHT-OF-WAY. 5. A SURVEY BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER IS REQUIRED. THE SURVEY SHALL SNOW HOW THE PROPERTY LINES WERE DETERMINE[) AND THAT THE PROPERTY CORNERS WERE SET WITH SURVEYORS LICENSE NUMBERSON DURABLE MONUMENTS. THIS SURVEY SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ALL CORNERS NEED TO BE MAINTAINED OR REINSTALLED BEFORE THE BUILDING FINAL. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR RE-ESTABLISHED AT THE END OF THE PROJECT. 6. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY. 1_ CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING USE SHALL CONFORM TO CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED BY PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. 8. THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION. 9. NEW DRIVEWAY OR DRIVEWAY WIDENING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER SHOW DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY OPENING TO THE CLOSEST ADJACENT DRIVEWAY ON SITE PLAN. II, NO STORM WATERS, UNDERGROUND WATERS DRAINING FROM ANY LOT, BUILDING, OR PAVED AREAS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO DRAIN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES NOR SHALL THESE WATERS BE CONNECTED TO THE CITY'S SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. THESE WATERS SHALL ALL DRAIN TO EITHER ARTIFICIAL OR NATURAL STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES BY GRAVITY OR PUMPING REGARDLESS OF THE SLOPE OF THE PROPERTY." MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 18-08-010 (1). • STORM WATER SHALL BE DRAINED THROUGH A CURB DRAIN OR TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. SEE CITY STANDARDS FOR CURB DRAIN DESIGN. • FLOOD ZONE 'C' REQUIRES FLOOD ZONE CONFIRMATION AND/OR PROTECTION OF HABITABLE SPACE. • PROVIDE ELEVATIONS TO CONFIRM DRAINAGE AND SITE DESIGN. 12. NEW DRIVEWAY OR DRIVEWAY WIDENING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER SNOW DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY OPENING TO THE CLOSEST ADJACENT DRIVEWAY ON SITE PLAN. FIRE SPRINKLER DOMESTIC WATER MCV LEGEND: WM - WATER METER V - VALVE DCV - DOUBLE CHECK VALVE MCV - MAIN CONTROL VALVE BFD - BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICE -W- - WATER LINE 1-1/4"0 TYP- I. PROVIDE A BACFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE - USC APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY. 2, CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY A SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVED CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SCHEDULING WATER DEPARTMENT FINAL. 3. PROVIDE ADEQUATE FIRE FLOW BASED UPON CONSTRUCTION AND SIZE OF BUILDING, SEE UFC APPENDIX IIIA. SCHEMATIC WATER LATERAL LIN NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE NOTES: RAINWATER COLLECTION ALL NEW ROOF RAINWATER SHALL BE COLLECTED BY MEANS OF GALVANIZED METAL GUTTERS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, LOCATED AT THE EAVES. PAINT TO MATCH COLOR SCHEME OF RESIDENCE. GUTTER SHALL LEAD TO 2" X 4" RECTANGULAR METAL DOWNSPOUTS OR DOWNSPOUTS TO MATCH EXISTING AND/OR COPPER RAINWATER LEADER DOWNSPOUTS SHALL TERMINATE BELOW GRADE TO A PERIMETER 4" DIAMETER ABS SOLID DRAINPIPE. RUN 4" DIAMETER (OR SIZE AS NOTED ON SITE PLAN) SOLID PIPE THROUGH FACE OF CURB SO THAT WATER WILL EMPTY INTO THE STREET GUTTER SYSTEM. SLOPE ALL PIPES FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. INSURE THAT THE LOCATION CHOSEN FOR THE PIPE TO GO THROUGH THE FACE OF CURB IS ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE WATER FROM THE SITE TO A CITY MAINTAINED WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. IN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES THE WATER MAY FLOW TO THE STREET BY GRAVITY METHOD PROVIDED THERE IS SUFFICIENT GRADE TO INSURE FLOW TO THE STREET GUTTER AND THAT WATER DOES NOT FLOW ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTIES. SUMP PUMP MAY BE REQUIRED (SEE SITE PLAN) IF THE GRAVITY METHOD OF DRAINAGE CANNOT BE USED, PROVIDE A SUMP PUMP OF ADEQUATE SIZE TO CARRY ALL WATER THROUGH A 2" DIAMETER ABS PIPE THROUGH THE FACE OF THE CURB SO THAT THE WATER WILL EMPTY INTO THE GUTTER SYSTEM. INSURE THAT THE LOCATION CHOSEN FOR THE PIPE TO GO THROUGH THE FACE OF CURB IS ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE WATER FROM THE SITE TO A CITY MAINTAINED WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. PROVIDE A BACKFLOW PREVENTER/DEVICE AT A LOCATION NEAR THE TERMINATION OF THE SOLID PIPE THROUGH THE FACE OF CURB AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT RAINWATER FROM THE GUTTER SYSTEM ENTERING THE SUMP PUMP SYSTEM. SUMP PUMP AT A MINIMUM SHALL BE A 1/4 HP AUTOMATIC SUBMERSIBLE SUMP PUMP WITH PERFORMANCES AS LISTED BELOW (MINIMUM). INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. DISCHARGE FEET OF HEAD 5 10 15 PERFORMANCE (GALLONS PER HOUR) 2200 1620 660 SUMP PIT- INSTALL PUMP IN SUMP PIT (CATCH BASIN) WITH THE MINIMUM CLEARANCES AND DEPTHS AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. FIRE NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SEPARATE FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11-04-030 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE. THE MINIMUM SIZE SERVICE FOR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL CONFORMS TO NFPA 13 OR 13R IS 2". FOR NFPA 13D SYSTEMS THE MINIMUM SIZE IS P. FIRE SPRINKLER SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE BURLINGAME FIRE DEPARTMENT AT 1399 ROLLINS ROAD, BURLINGAME ONLY AFTER FIRE SPRINKLER UNDERGROUNDS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE BURLINGAME BUILDING DEPARTMENT. NOTES: I. REPLACE DAMAGED OR DISPLACED CURB, GUTTER AND/OR SIDEWALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE. A CITY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 2, THE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL (BUILDING SEWER) SHALL BE TESTED PER ORDINANCE CODE CHAPTER 15.12. TESTING INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTER AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WHENEVER THE CITY'S PORTION OF THE SEWER LATERAL OR CITY CLEANOUT IS TO BE LAID AND/OR CONNECTED TO THE SEWER MAINS. 3. A PROPERTY SURVEY IS REQUIRED IF ANY PART OF PERMANENT STRUCTURE INCLUDING FOOTING IS WITHIN 12" OF PROPERTY LINE. 4. REPLACE ALL CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK FRONTING SITE, (2) PLUG ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND INSTALL A NEW 4" LATERAL, (3) ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR SERVICES OR FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATION, (4) ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORKS WITHIN CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY- T,45LE NO. ,4-111-,4-1 MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW 4 FLOW DURATION 5UILDING5 FIRE AREA {square feet] FIRE FLOW [gallons FLOW IX)RATION x0.0929 far m2 minute] {hours] Type-F.R. II-F.R.1 Type II One-HR. III One-HR.1 Type IV-H.T. V-One-Hr.1 Type II-N II-N1 Type V-N1 x 3.785 for Urnin. 0-22,700 0-12,700 M.200 M,900 03,600 1,500 2 22,70130,200 12,701-17,000 8,201-10,900 5.901-7.900 3.601-0,800 1,750 30,20138,700 17.001-21.800 10.901-12,900 7.901-9.800 4.801-6.200 2.000 36,701-48,300 21.801-24,200 12,901-17,400 9.801-12.600 6.201-7,700 2,260 48,301-59,000 24.201-33,200 17,401-21,300 12,601-15,400 7,701-9,400 2,500 59,001-70,900 33,201-39,700 21,301-25,500 15,401-18,400 9,401-11,300 2,750 70,901-83.700 39,701-47,100 25,50130,100 18,401-21,800 11,301-13.400 3,000 3 83,701-97,700 47.101-54.900 30,10135,200 21,801-25,900 13.401-15.800 3,250 97.701.112.700 54.901-63.400 35.201-40,600 25.901-29.300 15.601-18,000 3.500 112,701-128,700 63.401-72,400 40,601-46,400 29,301-33.500 18.001-20,600 3,750 128,701-145,900 72,401-82,100 46,401-5Z500 33,501-37.900 20,601-23,300 4,000 145,901-164,200 62,101-92,400 52,501'�59,100 37,901-42,700 23,301-26,300 4,250 164,201-1;83,400 92,401-103,100 59.101-66,000 42,701-47,700 26,301-29,300 4,500 183,401-203.700 103.101-114,600 86.001-73,300 47.701-53.000 29.301-32,800 4.750 203,701-225.200 114.601-126,700 73,301.81,100 53,001-58.600 32.601-36,000 5,000 225,201-247,700 126.701-139,400 81,101.89,200 58,601-65.400 36,001-39,600 5,250 247,701-271,200 139,401-162,600 89,201-97,700 65,401-70,600 39,601-43,400 5,500 271,201-295,900 152,601-166,500 97,701-106,500 70,601-77,000 43,401-47,400 5,750 4 295,901-Greater 186,601-Greater 106.501-115.800 77,001-83,700 47,401-51,500 6,000 " 115.801-125.500 83.701-90.600 51.501-55,700 6.250 " 125,501-136,500 90.601-97.900 55.701-60,200 6,500 135,501-145,800 97.901-106,800 60,201-64,800 6,750 " 145,801-156,700 106,801-113,200 64,801-69,600 7,000 " 156.701-167.900 113,201-121,300 89,601-74,800 7,250 " 187.901-179.400 121,301-129.600 74.601-79.800 7,500 " 179.401-191.400 129.601-138.300 79.801-85,100 7.750 " 191,401-Greater 128,301-Greater 85,101-Greater 8,000 END OF (N) FENCE (N) 6'-0" SOLID WOOD FENCING PLUS 12" LATTICE 1J-1 I I Z I L w U NOTE ❑ nZ - ❑ w 1. EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS LESS THAN 5 -� FEET FROM THE p- PROPERTY LINE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AS w A 1-HR FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLY. 2013.CBC TABLE 602. 2. ROOF EAVES WILL NOT PROJECT WITHIN 2 FCEEPROP RTY LINE. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I i I ADJACENT NEIGHBOR �n II LO I �t \ m \ I \ I \ I \ -- (E) RESIDENCE TO J BE REMOVED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0" N woo 1 •tie . I / 10' 50.02' (P) (N) LAWN low ,� �r ® o �-�----- 6- C WIDE .g6 U - J TT L ..I .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'...'..'.............:..:..:......'. DS 1JAY I.... L.: .. �....... ................ .............. .'. . ;5 z� I ...................... ............................................I .............::.:I DS I. . ......::........:: . . . ::....... . 56 �� I.. �... ........ ............... 1 II......................... l.. �... �......... .. .......� 1 I k .. 1,12 TYP:. ............ .. l ID ............................... .............................................. ... Bt I� ''''NEW -RE IDEN�E .. 12 TY .. . A.. .......... � FFL E - 9150 ........ . j . .... ...... .. .. ..... ... ... ..�,. r.................... ................... p.......... f.. . . �... .. { p .................... I.............. ...............1..L 1D ....................I.. .........I..................................{..� �.. . .. .� GM I ��6.'...... I ............... I.. I. . ❑����❑� � .....................I.. 1:12 T1P:.....� .I ❑ ❑ 5 u 12'-6" DRIVEWAY APPROACH COLUMBUS 5.550 C) (E) TREE (2k6" �WWVION pi (E) TREEA] • AVENUE 1011 ALLEY (N) 4° SE*rR-LATERAL - TO CITY CLEANOUT PER CITY STDS.I I I (E) GOING. SLAB TO BE REMOVED 684• I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I (E) PATIO SLAB TO BE REMOVED I I I (N) 550/COUNTER - - BUILDING SETBACK ADDRESS- SETBACK: 1369 145' 0) 1361 20.1' 1365 18b' 1361 225 1359 25.3' 1351 (SITE) 16.4' 1353 I SIo' i2 i 1 i3412 1345 16B 1341 16B' 1323 16.51I 13mi i F- 37Y1- I 18.1' AVERAGE SETBACK = I (N) GRAVEIL WALK I I I I � I I I � 1L Li) ADJACENT NEIGHBOR � I II I I Z 10 LU 1u _w 1u 0 93 88 M f j U_ '32.11 T.O.C. 01� (501 R/W) REVISIONS BY PLANNING PU PLANNING 10/05/17 PU L. [� 7t O I-� 0000 cq U > w) 3 ;~ CIO c� - CI: CIO :~ w 0 CIOCIS Q ��wY z �¢ 9� 9 b 0 � O G w con7=1U 4"'a Q U0 C13 ad U y Uj cd cd 4 3 cd � c 9' O o U w ,C!d � B � F_ 3 > - QROFES3O� Y/ 0. P�-SH NO. C-29056 * Exp. 3-31-19 SgTFOF IVIL AUFO��P s� W �O DATE: AUG. 2016 SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWN: PMU JOB: SHEET NO. A*2 OF SHEETS (E) GARAGE (E) WOOD FENCING (N) 0-0" VEHICULAR GATE (N) EVERGREEN PRIVACY TREES (N) LAWN STRIP W/ DRIP IRRIGATION ADJACENT HOUSE (E) PITTOSPORUM HEDGE/TREES TO REMAIN (E) WOOD FENCING (N) STEPPING STON PATH *SET FLUSH W/ LAWN (N) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5550045 1 "E ------------- I �I I I I I (N) I I II GARAGE II I I 1 + 96.50 II � I � I i I i� �)mpk-lm■����6 II V 51 5 (N) G' SOLID WOOD FENCING PLUS 1 2" LATTICE 2.02' (N) LAWN (N) PAVER PADS *SET FLUsnW/-LAWN- •C1 1 1 I I 1 1 (N) CITRUS TREES I C I 1 (N) 15 I 1 1 15 RESIDENCE 1 FFE : 97.5 I (N) STONE LANDING / STEPS D 1 - 6 I 4 L — 4 11 V. ©� ..�.-, 01 'mil` o �► � •■�1 10 P (N) BBQ / COUNTER *3' TALL MARBLE (N) GRAVEL WALK (N) G' SOLID WOOD FENCING PLUS 1 2" LATTICE (N) EVERGREEN PRIVACY TREES (N) GRAB/ ETBACK ADJACENT HOUSE (N) DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVER COLU ME3U5 AVEN U E 50' R.O.W. (N) EVERGREEN PRIVACY TPFFI=, (N) STEPPING STONES Q w �OOz <9 � oow z 00z � cm (E) BIRCH TREES TO REMAIN (E) STREET TREES DROUGHT TOLERANT (E) WATER METER (N) STEPPING STONES SET ON SAND BASE LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1 /8'' = 1 '-011 A" PLANT LIST 1 0/3/ 17 13ALDWIN RESIDENCE, 1357 COLUMBU5 AVENUE SYM SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QTY SIZE GROWTH WUCOLS TREES A Quercu5 rubra Red Oak - 24" BOX MOD. M B Acer palmatum 'Sangu Kaku' Japanese Maple 1 24" BOX SLOW M C Citrus 5pp. Sweet Orange 3 24" BOX MOD. M D Tri5taniop5i5 laurina (5td) Swamp Myrtle 2 24" BOX MOD. M E Lauru5 nobili5'Saratoga' (5td) Grecian Laurel 10 5 GAL MOD. L F Podocarpu5 gracilior 5td Fern Pine 8 15 GAL MOD. M SHRUBS / PERENNIALS I llemerocalli5 'Dwarf Red Daylily 75 1 GAL MOD. M 2 Lavandula angu5tifolia 'Hidcote' English Lavender 4 1 GAL MOD. L 3 Ro5a 'Flowering Carpet' Groundcover Rose 9 2 GAL MOD. M 4 Pitto5porum tenuifolium 'Marjorie Channon' Pitto5porum 4 15 GAL MOD. M 5 Rosa 'I ceberg' Iceberg Rose G 5 GAL FAST M G hydrangea macrophylla 'Endless Summer' hydrangea 2 5 GAL MOD. M 7 Pieri5japonica'Mt Fire' Japanese Pieri5 3 15 GAL SLOW M 8 Loropetalum chinen5e'Kazzleberry' Fringe Flower G 5 GAL MOD. L 9 Camellia japonica Camellia 5 15 GAL MOD. M 10 Ligu5trum japonIcum 'Texan um' Japanese Privet 3 15 GAL FAST M I I heuchera 5angunea Coral Bells 25 1 GAL MOD. M VINES V- I Trachelo5permum ja5minoide5 (staked) Star Jasmine G 5 GAL MOD. M V-2 Di5tIGtu5 buccinatoria (espalier) Blood -Red Trumpet Vine 1 5 GAL FAST M MEADOW Native Mow Free Blend, Delta 51ueyrass5 Co. (BOO) 637-8873 500 sf ROLLS SLOW - L LAWN Bolero Plus Blend, Delta Bluegrass Co. (BOO) 637-8873 575 sf ROLLS SLOW - H *lawn not included in calculations, see area calcs TOTAL QTY: G73 L VL QTY: 520 77.3% VL 0 sf 0 city L 1 ,5G5 5f 520 c1ty M 4GO 5f 153 c1ty NON -TURF IRRIGATED AREA: 2,025 H 0 sf 0 aty 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLANT AND SOD QUANTITIES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID FOR WORK. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS OF NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NURSERY LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION. 3. PLANT MATERIAL CANNOT BE GUARANTEED AS DEER RESISTANT DUE TO CHANGING HABITS OF DEEP, 4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A LAYER OF BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2 INCHES, WITH A CHIP SIZE OF NO LE55 THAN ONE INCH, A 2 INCH LAYER OF GREENWA5TE MULCH UNDER THE BARK MULCH IS RECOMMENDED. 5. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED A5 NECESSARY. SOIL AMENDMENT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS. KOCK5 LARGER THAN ONE INCH DIAMETER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 501L AMENDMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN TYPICAL NATIVE PLANT LANDSCAPE AREAS. G. PLANTING HOLES SHALL GENERALLY BE 2x 3x THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL. THE WALLS AND BASES OF PLANT HOLES SHALL BE SCARIFIED. HOLE5 SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 5% ORGANIC COMPOST � 95% EXISTING SOIL. PLANTING HOLES OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD BE INOCULATED WITH MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI, PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. 7. TREES SHALL BE STAKED WITH TWO PRESSURE TREATED 2" DIA. POLE5, TREE TRUNK SHALL BE SECURED WITH TWO RUBBER TIES OR STRAPS FORMING A FIGURE -EIGHT BETWEEN TRUNK AND STAKE. 8. RESIDUAL WEED PRE -EMERGENT SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR A5 NECESSARY. APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 9. LAWN SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. REVISIONS Qj 10/03/ 1 7 M.C. N O T E r O N r M N N V - O� W C-, �- p U M M = U > cocc L m� k U -- M; CO �E O N Y E O �p,NDSCgp�, l ti � 4092 LU a Uz zJ Uj Ow U) z_ Uj m zw Q m nDD O -j M � W r SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO: Ll .0 � [�� Qir`i� Y "" � 7�. � t .< ,�, ry ,rt,'r a � 1� � :'an 4 `, . •t ice, _ -A � i - � �.�. 7 � ; � . . � _ ��� 4 w.. s �� City of Burlingame Item No. Eb Design Review Regular Action Items Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. Applicant and Property Owner: Scott Duong APN: 027-165-050 Architect: Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Architecture Lot Area: 6,100 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The existing one-story house with a detached garage is located on an interior lot; it contains 2,107 SF (0.35 FAR) of floor area and has four bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add living space at the rear of the house, remodel the existing front covered porch, and add a new second story (1,420 SF). The applicant also proposes to convert the existing basement (198 SF) into crawlspace. With the proposed project, the floor area will increase to 3,302 SF (0.54 FAR), the maximum allowed. With this project, there is no increase to the number of bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing detached garage (250 SF) provides one covered parking space that has a clear interior width of 13'-7%" and non -conforming clear interior depth of 17'-0". One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application: Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010 (a) (2)). 1411 De Soto Avenue Lot Size: 6,100 SF Plans date stamped: October 13, 2017 EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/REQ'D 08/01/17 plans 10/13/17 plans SETBACKS ----- -- Front (1s' fir): -........ 12 -10" (to porch) ...... 17'-l" (to porch) - ! no change to existing ! IT-l" _ .... __._-.-._.. (block average) (2nd fir) n/a 20'-0" _ 20'-0" 20 0 Side (left): 10'-6" I 10'-0" (to porch) ------------------- -... 1 V-111/8' (to addition) - - 4 -0" (right): 3'-9" 5'-0" (to addition) 5'-12" (to addition) 4'-0" — - - -- - - -- - Rear (11 fir): - -- — -- ---- — t 45'-4" - 48'-4^ - 49'-3„ - 1514. - --- - (2"d fir): n/a i 48'-4" 49'-3" 20'-0" - .......... Lot Coverage -.-.....- ,.. 2019 SF - - ------ 2011 SF ....._ ------ -4 2198 SF - ...._.---- ..... -.......... 2440 SF 33.1% 32.9_% 36% 40°/0 FAR: 2107 SF .... 3287 SF .a ............... ......._Y---- ! 3302 SF I --... -. ... ... _ .. 3302 SF 0.35 FAR 0.54 FAR 0.54 FAR 0.54 FAR ' (0.32 x 6100 SF) + 1100 SF + 250 SF = 3302 SF (0.54 FAR) Design Review 1411 De Soto Avenue 1411 De Soto Avenue Lot Size: 6,100 SF Plans date stamped: October 13, 2017 EXISTING ORIGINAL 08/01/17 plans REVISED 10/13/17 plans ALLOWED/REQ'D # of bedrooms: 4 ___ .. - 4 -- r no change Off -Street 1 covered 1 covered ---------------- -.-.--. ........- 1 covered Parking: (13'-7%" ' x 17'-0") ! (1 V-2" x 20'-2") no change to existing (9' x 18') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered i 1 uncovered (9' x 20' ) ! (9' x 20') (9' x 20') -- - Height: -- -._...._...----.-.-.-.-..-.__....- .:..-..i-..-.-.-._..: 20' 4" - --- --------- --------- }------- 26'-6" - .-.-.-.._.-.-.__----------- --------------. 30'-0" ..... ...... _..._..._............. _. 30'-0" Dy .__-_._.-._-.-..-._......._.-._ ------------- ......__.-r _ _.-...-.-.-.-.-.- .---_-- complies using window -_....__-_.-.-.-._-._•.---A-....-..--..-.-...-_.-.-.-.-.-...--_-.--.-..-.-__.___-..-.-.- Envelope: enclosure exception not applicable along right side of complies CS 25.26.075 house (CS 25.26.075 (b)(2)) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Engineering, Building, Fire, Parks, and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on August 14, 2017, the Commission had several comments and concerns with the project and referred the application to a design review consultant (see attached August 14, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below is a summary of the Commission's main concerns from the Design Review Study meeting: • Proposed modern design does not fit in with the character of the Easton Addition neighborhood which has mainly older and more traditional style homes. • Proposed design is boxy — too massive and not the right scale for the neighborhood. • The different plate heights on the second floor are not proportional and add to the mass and scale of the project. • Too much stucco for the siding of the house - harsh, prefer more wood siding. • Wood siding shown on the rendering differs from the shiplap siding shown on the plans — show more detailing. • Would like to see a mix of sloped and flat roofs. The applicant submitted revised plans date stamped October 13, 2017 to address the Planning Commission's comments and concerns. A discussion of the analysis of the revised project and recommendation by the design review consultant is provided in the next section. Analysis and Recommendation by Design Reviewer: The design review consultant met with the original project architect (Jack Chu, Chu Design Associates) and property owners twice to discuss the Planning Commission's concerns with the project and reviewed proposed revisions to the plans. In addition to the two in - person meetings on August 25, 2017 and September 22, 2017, the design review consultant communicated multiple times with both the homeowners and the original architect via email and telephone. Between the first and second meetings, multiple revisions to the plans were made and shared with the design review consultant via email. After the second meeting on September 22, 2017, the homeowners made the decision to bring on a new architect for the project. The new project architect (Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Architecture) was provided with the background information and project details which included comments and concerns from the Planning Commission at the Study Session and all comments and feedback provided by the design review consultant on the latest revision made by the original project architect. Please refer to the attached design reviewer's analysis and 2 Design Review 1411 De Soto Avenue recommendation, dated October 13, 2017, for a detailed review of the project. The design reviewer notes that "the new design meets the requirements of the design guidelines" and that the proposed massing of the house blends in with the traditional styles in the neighborhood. Based on the design review analysis of the project, the design reviewer recommends approval of the project as proposed. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring hip and gable roofs, proportional plate heights, stucco and shiplap siding, and aluminum clad wood windows) is compatible with the existing house and character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 13, 2017, sheets A1.0 through A9.0 and sheets L-0 through L-2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the Design Review 1411 De Soto Avenue conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Scott Duong, applicant and property owner Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Architecture, architect Attachments: Design Review Analysis, dated October 13, 2017 August 14, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Neighbor Letter and Signatures of Support — date stamped August 9, 2017 Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 13, 2017 Aerial Photo 21 DESIGN REVIEW ANALYSIS CITY OF BURLINGAME October 13, 2017 City of Burlingame Planning Division 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue Applicant and Property Owner: Scott Duong Architect: Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Planner: Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Dear Planning Commissioners, I have received and reviewed the original plans submitted by Jack Chu, Chu Design Associates, to the Planning Commission for 1411 De Soto Avenue. I listened to the Planning Commission's comments in the meeting video from the August 14, 2017, Study Session. I met with the Owner, Planner, and Jack Chu at City Hall to discuss the Planning Commission's comments. After multiple subsequent rounds of revisions and meetings, the Owners decided to engage a new architect. The design submitted by Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group, reflects the following changes in response to Planning Commission feedback: REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL DESIGN • Second floor plate height brought down from 11'-0" to 8'-3" to match the first floor plate height and reduce the overall building mass. • Roof forms sloped to further reduce the scale of the second story and better relate the massing to other houses in the neighborhood. • Footprint of the existing more generous porch proposed to remain. The larger porch helps the street face to present as a "house" instead of as an "apartment complex." • Reduced areas of blank stucco walls. A stone base that aligns with the porch helps ground the house given its raised first floor height. Wood siding painted to match the remaining stucco adds texture and scale. • Reduced size and shifted second floor deck to address neighbor's concern for privacy, • Detailing of fascia and board sizing made consistent. • Modern design reflected in detailing, metal roof and window style instead of boxy mass. Page 1 DESIGN GUIDELINES Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood This project is in the Easton Addition comprised of traditional single-family residences of varying styles. This project shares several features in common with other homes in the neighborhood including pitched roof forms, exposed gable ends, and a front porch. The majority of homes in the Easton Addition have either stucco or wood siding with wood trim and wood detailing. Stone or brick at the base of the house is also a common feature. The proposed residence incorporates similar finishes to those listed above. While the standing seam metal roof and more minimal window grid pattern proposed are less common, there are examples of projects in the Easton Addition that have been approved by the Planning Commission with these materials. 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood This neighborhood has mostly detached garages, as does this current and proposed residence. No change is proposed to the existing driveway and curb cut location. 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure The proposed second story massing is integrated to make the whole house a cohesive design. The second floor plate height does not exceed that of the first floor which is modest at 8'-3". Gable elements and windows are aligned where possible. There is modulation along each elevation to break up the building mass and create scale appropriate to the residential neighborhood. The mix of materials further breaks up the mass. While the detailing and finishes tend towards modern, the massing and forms fit with the various traditional styles present. 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties This residence is located on De Soto between Hillside and Hale. The existing first floor footprint is pulled back from the rear. The added second floor is weighted towards the driveway and away from the closest neighbor on the right to respect the neighbors' footprints. The deck off the Master Bedroom has been shifted away from the 2-story neighbor on the left. The closest house on the deck side is a single -story structure so there are no direct views to neighboring windows as there is only the neighbor's roof below. The deck is sized for at most two chairs or some potted plants. 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Extensive landscaping is proposed to compliment the architecture and create screening between neighbors. Page 2 SUMMARY It is my opinion that the new design meets the requirements of the design guidelines. It is in the growing typology of modern houses that have been approved in the Easton Addition and blend well with the range of more traditional styles in that neighborhood because of how the massing is handled. Given the extensive changes, this presents as a new house design compared with the previous version. The Planning Commission may have feedback after reviewing this for, in effect, the first time. I hope that the proposed design is close enough that any input specific to this new design will be minor and easily addressed. Sincerely, Jeanne Davis Page 3 AME Y HALL City of Burlingame BURLING501 PRIMMROSEROSE ROAD BLtlRLINGAME BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Monday, August 14, 2017 7:00 PM Council Chambers b. 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling. (Scott Duong, applicant and property owner; Jack Chu, Chu Design Associates, architect) (57 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi All Commissioners had visited the site. Commissioner Loffis met with the neighbors at 1407 De Soto Avenue. Community Development Director provided an overview of the staff report. He noted a petition from neighbors in support of the application. Questions of Staff.. There were no questions of Staff. Chair Gum opened the public hearing. Scott Duong and Jack Chu represented the applicant. Commission Questions/Comments: > Doesn't fully understand the various different fascia sizes. (Chu: Second floor is 2" x 12" and first floor is 2"x 8" to distinguish the two different facades.) > Why the tall plate heights? (Chu: client wanted taller ceiling heights.) > Shiplap siding shown on plans does not match the siding on the rendering. (Duong: Siding is natural cedar wood.) > Did the neighbors who signed the petition see the rendering? (Duong: No, the rendering was not completed yet.) > It's a struggle of how to incorporate modern architecture into a traditional neighborhood. > This block is primarily Tudor and Spanish style homes. Traditional form and massing with updated materials is ideal in such neighborhoods. This project does not meet that. (Duong: Do not want to build a Tudor or Spanish style. Want something fresh and contemporary.) Public Comments: Sherry Lewis, 1407 De Soto: Concerned regarding how the light to their property will be affected. Has a shadow study been prepared; would like to request one to see what the impacts will be. Did not see the plans or the rendering until Sunday. Concerned about a second floor deck in the rear that would look into their property. Could there be design elements to address privacy concerns. Doesn't feel the architectural style fits within the neighborhood; attractive but is radically different in style to everything else on the block. Other homes have pitched roofs, not flat roofs. Brian Bann, 1408 DeSoto: Materials in this type of design are important to the aesthetics; want more details. Perhaps more use of wood elements. City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 10/19/2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 14, 2017 Jan Robertson, 1408 DeSoto: Had only seen architectural drawings but not the rendering until this evening. Is quite modern in design. Other homes are Spanish and Tudor in the neighborhood. Need to be open to new ideas, but defers to the Commission to determine if it fits with the neighborhood. Applicant's Response: Duong: Front, side and rear will include wood siding. Only the left hand side will be stucco. Neighbor to the left's property is much taller than the proposed house. The rear deck is over the new family room, is inset, doesn't project out and is along the driveway side. Chair Gum closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > There could be ways to ease the Modern design into the neighborhood. The design looks like the bottom half of an apartment building because of flat roofs. Pitched roofs may help design. With no similar homes around it, it sticks out like a sore thumb. > Is an older neighborhood with mature trees. Not sure that the design fits currently but it could fit. The massing is not done well; everything is two stories; could be broken up a bit more. Would rather see more wood siding. A modern home usually has a chimney that is more squared off. The massing needs to be reigned in a bit more. > Doesn't have a problem with Modern design in a traditional neighborhood if the design still reads as a home. Need to build something that still behaves with its neighbors. There are a number of one-story traditional homes with a few two-story homes. If a traditional design was submitted with this massing, it still would have been too boxy. Need fine detailing to fit into the neighborhood. Scale and proportion need to be looked at; is not necessarily a function of style. Will need to look at the plate heights. > There are fine examples of Modern architecture in the Easton Addition area that fit in well. > The second floor plate height is generally nine -feet, with the main corner element on the front being eleven feet. Could include a mix of sloped and flat roofs. Feels is a good candidate for a design review consultant. > There have been some homes in Easton Addition that bring a Modern take on Traditional architecture. Must be careful with the design. The rear deck will be intrusive to the neighbors, particularly from a noise standpoint. Doesn't believe that the home fits with the neighborhood, would not approve it as designed. > Doesn't feel that this design fits, though appreciates Modern design. Agrees that an updated Traditional design could fit. Would like to see a contemporary home that is made to fit in with neighborhood. > Is a different design than is produced by this architect firm. This design doesn't fit. Would be more likely to approve project if Traditional style with Contemporary features rather than a Contemporary style with Traditional features. Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Terrones, to send the item to a design review consultant. Discussion of Motion: > The second floor deck appears to meet criteria applied in prior instances in order to preserve privacy of neighbors. > Have generally looked at a 100 square foot threshold for second floor decks. Could also enclose a portion of the deck that would make it fit better. > The applicant is skilled enough to demonstrate that most shadows will be cast to the right. Chair Gum asked for a voice vote, and the motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Gum, Gaul, Terrones, Sargent, Loftis, Kelly, and Comaroto City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1011912017 0,19pA EI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: © Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: OZ_� ' ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS APPLICANT Name: Scott Duong Address: 1411 De Soto Ave City/State/Zip: Burlingame CA 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 De S,3+0 A\le E-mail: PROPERTY OWNER Name: Scott and Leanne Duong Address: 1411 De Soto Ave City/State/Zip: Burlingame CA 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 E-mail: scottduong@verizon.net ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Jack Chu Address: 55 43rd Ave RECEIVED City/State/Zip: San Mateo CA94403 JUN - 5 2017 Phone: 650-345-9286 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. E-mail: jackchu2l@yahoo.com Burlingame Business License Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: t'rSF-FC� aAdk"L" AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief I Applicant's signature: Date: I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: 6 /�'6 Date submitted: S: t HANDOUTSt PC Application. doc H Project Address: Description From: Project Comments - Planning Application 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-166-060 Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 2) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non -compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water -conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found athttp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09- 10/bill/sen/sb 0401-0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement, 12) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2016 C'BC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 14) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 16) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 19) Provide two completed copies of the Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 20) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: August 1, 2017 650 558-7270 Project Address: Description From: Project Comments — Planning Application 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-165-050 Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Rick Caro I II Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2016 California Mechanical Code, 2016 California Electrical Code, and 2016 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. 2) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non -compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water -conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1, 1994. Details can be found at http• llwww leginfo ca gov/pub/09- 10/bill/sen/sb 0401-0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 cha tered html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 3) Place the following information on the first page of the plans. Note: As of October 19, 2016, the working hours have changed as follows. "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No Work Allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and S:OOP.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. 4) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2016 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 5) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 6) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 8) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88) 9) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within two feet of the property line 2016 CRC § Table R302.1(1) or 2016 CBC Table 705.2 10) Provide details on the plans which show that all roof projections which project beyond the point where fire -resistive construction would be required will be constructed of one -hour fire - resistance -rated construction per 2016 CRC § R302.l(1) or 2016 CBC §705.2. 11) Indicate on the floor plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. 2016 CRC Table R302.1(1) § or 2016 CBC, Table 602) 12) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with 2016 CBC, Table 705.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 13) RESIDENTIAL: Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawings specify the location and the net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2016 California Residential Code 2016 CRC § R310 or CBC 1030. 14) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 15) Provide the location of the water heater and the furnace. 16) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 17) Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood -burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood -burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood -burning device. 18) If the fireplace is a solid wood -burning device then specify on the plans that the fireplace chimney will terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet or will be retrofit with a fireplace insert (not a log lighter.) 2016 CRC § 1003.9 or 2016 CBC 2113.9 18.10.100 Appendix C, Figure C amended —Exit terminals of mechanical draft and direct -vent venting systems. The Figure in Appendix C of the 2016 California Residential Code is amended by adding the following note: Note: Where the property line is less than ten (10) feet from the exit terminal of any newly installed or replacement high efficiency mechanical equipment the pipe size of the final ten (10) feet of any terminal must be increased to three inches (3 ") or, as an alternative, manufacturer -approved baffles must be installed. (Ord. 1856 § 7, (2010); Ord. 1889 § 8, (2013)) The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 19) Provide two completed copies of the Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 20) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: June 6, 2017 650 558-7270 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-165-050 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. No comments at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. Based on the scope of work, this is a "Type I" project that requires a Stormwater Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on private property or in the public right-of-way). 2. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to starting work. 3. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 4. Replace damaged and displaced curb, gutter and/or sidewalk fronting site. 5. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire line protection are to be installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be installed by builder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval. 6. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. 7. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. s. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the plans set. A copy can be found at http://www.flowsto bay.org/sites/defa u It/files/Co u ntvwide% 20 P rogra m % 20 BM P % 20P la n % 20S heet- June%202014%20Update.pdf#overlay-context=brochures or http://www.flowstobay.org/brochures then click "construction bmp plan sheet" Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 6/8/17 650-558-7245 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-166-060 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. From: Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Sheet A.0 - Fire note #2 — Sprinkler plans are a deferred submittal to the Central County Fire Department, not to the Fire Marshal for the City of San Mateo. Please correct reference. 7/31/17 Item corrected. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal: Provide a 1-inch water meter or size to accommodate sprinkler system flow demand. 2. Provide a backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —A schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building permit plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate fire sprinklers shall be installed under a separate deferred fire permit, approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. 4. If an electronic gate crosses the driveway, provide a Knox key switch connected to the gate to allow for fire department emergency access. Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 7/31/17 650-558-7617 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-166-060 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. From: Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Sheet A.0 - Fire note #2 — Sprinkler plans are a deferred submittal to the Central County Fire Department, not to the Fire Marshal for the City of San Mateo. Please correct reference. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal: Provide a 1-inch water meter or size to accommodate sprinkler system flow demand. 2. Provide a backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — A schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building permit plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate fire sprinklers shall be installed under a separate deferred fire permit, approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. 4. If an electronic gate crosses the driveway, provide a Knox key switch connected to the gate to allow for fire department emergency access. Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 6/27/17 650-558-7617 Project Comments - Parks Application Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-165-050 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. From: Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No further comments The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Reviewed By: BD Date: 7.31.17 bdisco a�burlingame.org 558-7333 c,rY O Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 1411 De Sofia Avenue, zoned R4, APN- 027-165-050 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Please address the following conseents at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmitial: 1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree maybe removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (555- 7330) 2. Complete Water Efficiency Cheddist (attached) The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of budding permit submittal. 3. Irrigation plan will be revierwed for building permit. Reviewed By:BD Date: 6.14.17 H Project Comments — Planning Application Project Address: 1411 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-166-060 Description: Request for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling. From: Carolyn Critz Stormwater Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Nothing needed at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Will need full BMP Sheet at time of building permit. Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: 7/6/2017 650.826.1554 RECEIVED TO: Planning Commission Members, City of Burlingame AUG - 9 ��i;7 RE: 1411 De Soto Ave, Burlingame, California CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. I/We have reviewed the attached second story addition and remodeling plan by Chu Design Associates Architects, dated 8/6/2017 and have no objections to the location of the proposed addition and remodeling. 1. Y-A NN G w0� _*Signatur_ 7�/ - Name Address Date 2. 4AwttU I�JC Name I q � Z TT t5- 07-0 b-119 Address Name Address 4._I Name G Address 5. _ Name Address 6. Name Address t-sb7L� A--Y Signature S.�(.0 �I--�- Date Sign ure Date Signature Dater � ��--- Signature Date Signature Date RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and detached garage at WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 23, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1411 De Soto Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 13, 2017, sheets A1.0 through A9.0 and sheets L-0 through L-2; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7, that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 1411 De Soto Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. z WW V_ = I— ii Z J a ILE O Lo 'Q O IL LO 0 o � O C �m E E U m N O O CD L O Q N N L E �Q O O U N mQ fl. T a = m C C •— m 0 c E o o m cmiU0 Q E mmo� w C � T � m oEa U U Om ¢Ya L 0 O L a m U �� o _ � o � Qa >, (D m c o � m m O a a T a) U 0 L U Na o_ N C N O N OU U 0 C _ � Y m O 3 +" O C ai U L 9 O O C L �nNOm m .U) o m 0 -0 D. N m a L O N 0 C 0 .in a O_ N L 4 � La a O d 72 m C O Q W m U O C co E m U N .0 0 0 c N N L C �i O 0-0 m N C o- m O C a`� 0 0 Y C m r E-• 0 47 N co LO O LO U N m OQ m E Q m C O a a m O a O N Q C E O N Y Q C E m E �U L t CL �f[ ♦ 9 SI,! �a. rSL £` 9� 9, C[ C[ C i8S£ .. Ogk g. - - L • Se f�L�� Cl Ir sa£[ £! £L �. ! K o [ ^•, L. r a b �. £L ^ L O S£L 6,0 1p, t L w s ff .� o [ L 9 !VA O O r f ^ 9 , ryy ^^.. ry o .o / ez el [ ^ O2 b L oz O .�fvt L S '9[ AZ 1 _ % O L 2n ! 121 �20 ry bn[ £b[ • e L - b[ 2�29 2Z� � S1,n[ ♦ lb[ e,[e . \ t ' 2,33 i,j50 . ryO^O g rCb[ £tnr is Ob [ L 2e .i } L! fb r O�, , 6 ,'Ore Z's ry P h` lb ry �ry h ofra DUONG 1411 DESOTO AVE. PC` o . 1411 ❑e Solo Avenue STREET MAP PROPERTY MAPS CODES: 2016 EDITION OF THE: RES CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE CALIFORNIA PLUM51NG CODE CALIFORNIA MECPANICAL CODE CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CCDE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE CALIFCRNIA ENERGY CODE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE CALIFCRNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE ALONG UJITN ALL OTPER LOCAL AND STATE LAUDS AND REGULATIONS. DENCE Burlingame, CA. KEY PROJECT STATS Setbacks EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOV14EIXREM) • Front(1 st) : 12'-10" 17.1' 17.1' (block average) • Front (2nd) N/A 20' 20' • Side (Left) 10'-6" 10' (to remodelled porch) 4' (to remodelled porch) • Side (Right) 3'-9" 5' (to addition) 4' (to addition) • Rear (1 st) 45'-4" 48v-411 15' • Rear (2nd) n/a 481-411 20' Max Height: 30► 30' • Top of Roof 30' Max Coverage : 2,019 SF (33.1%) 2,216 SF (36%) 21440 SF (40%) Max FAR SF : 21107 SF (.35 FAR) 3287 SF (.54 FAR) 31304 SF (.54 FAR) PROPERTY SPECS. APN Number; 004-008-100-700 Zoning Designation: R-1 Site Area: 6100 SF Lot Dimensions: 50 x 122 PROJECT AREAS 5.F. EXI5TING GARAGE AREA : 268.00 EXISTING FIRST FLOCK AREA (TO BE DOWN -SIZED): 16g8.64 EXISTING FRONT ENTRY PCRCH AREA : g6.15 TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA : 1g14.64 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR AREA : 165q.1a PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR AREA : 1506.32 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR AREA : 268.00 PROPOSED CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA : 3165.50 EXISTING FOOT -PRINT AREA : 1g14.64 1407 DE50TO AVE. 1411 DE50TO AVE. 1415 DE50TO AVE. (5UBJEGT PROPERTY) DRAWING SHEET INDEX Label Title Architectural A-1 COVER SHEET A-2 EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-3 EXISTING FLOOR PLANS A-4 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS A-5 EXISTING & PROPOSED ROOF PLANS A-6 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-7 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-8 GARAGE EXISTING & PROPOSED PLANS A-9 EXTERIOR VIEWS Landscaping L-0 EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 IRRIGATION HYDROZONE PLAN HROJEGT SCOPE 1. DEMOL15H EXISTING KITCHEN AND RELOCATE TO NEW LOCATION. 2. REPLACE EXI5TING GARAGE DOOR, SIDE DOOR AND EXIST. WINDOW, AND ADD A WINDOW TO RIGHT WALL OF GARAGE. 3. DEMOL15H EXISTING BEDROOM CLOSET, CONVERT TO NEW PANTRY. 4. DEMOL15H EXI5TIN(5 HALLWAY BATHROOM, & CONVERT TO NEW STAIRS TO SECOND FLOOR. 5. ADD NEW POWDER ROOM AND NEW BATHROOM. 6. CONVERT EXISTING BEDROOM #2 TO NEW GUEST SUITE. 1. ADD A NEW SECOND FLOOR. 8. ADD A NEW IPE DECK AT REAR OFF FAMILY ROOM. q. REPLACE FRONT ENTRY DECK, WITH STONE BASE, NEW STONE PAVERS, AND PAINTED COLUMNS AND OPEN BEAM AND 4X RAFTERS ABOVE. 10. EX15TING BASEMENT 15 TO BE CONVERTED INTO A CRAWL SPACE. PROJECT DIRECTORY LANI)5CAFE DESIGN TANIGUCHI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1013 SOUTH CLARET" IONT ST. STE. 1 SAN I" IATEC, CALIF. 94402 TEL: (&50) 636-99a5 FAX: (l 50) 63a-998ro dennis@dtlandarch.com CI4U DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. 55 lU. 43RD AVE. SAN MATEO, CA 94403 TEL: ((o50) 345-92a(o, EXT. 101 E-MAIL: Dare'Ochudesier.c®m NOTE : MR. 4 MRS_ SCOTT DUONG 1411 DE 50TO AVENUE BURL INGAME, CA 94010 TEL : 1-310-5(c2-a130 E-MAIL: 5catt&�crg0verizon.net LANE) 5L FFVE ' SAVIOR P. MICALLEF LAN® SURVE''IN 421 LUILDWOOD DRIVE SOUTI4 SAN FRANCISCC, CA 940�30 TEL: ((o50) 808-0250 FAX: (805) 109-2423 BIGGSGROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC G GS No /�F �0 .IN I SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE C A1- Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net z O Q O >Q z Q U w O N O E � O � Q z �m W 0 W Lli ry PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-2011 Revision Table No. Date Description w w _ W ry W > O CU A=1 MASSING COMPARISON STUDY � r -� pp F i _ F 1 Ilk 5 , It y # f T y � i PO vt ■ 4 I 1 l El 1 BIGGSGROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC W G US I SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE � C A1- Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net Z 0 1 o ;Q z Q U W o ai � o E J a Q Z �m W 0 C LU 01. PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-2011 Revision Table No. Date Description V ) 3: ry o 0. W I— x W GENERAL FIN15H NOTES: 1. FACIA TO BE 2Xb. 2. ALL WINDOWS TO BE ALUMINUM GLAD WOOD WITH TRUE DIVIDED LITE5. �il■miuiiiiuiiliuiiwl■lM INS I 1111111ilm I r FIRST FLR. EL. 102. q' STONE BASE GRAD PAINTED WOOD COLUMN (DOUBLE 8" 50. POSTS) A.T.O.G. PAINTED WOOD BEAM AND 4X RAFTERS ABOVE g1.85' FRONT ELEVATION - PROPOSED 5CALE:1 /4"=1'-0" r� TOP OF RIDGE t— m DIRECT VENT EXHAUST LEFT ELEVATION -PROPOSED UA-7 56ALE:1/4"=1'-0" WATER HEATER DIRECT VENT EXHAUST b:12 55 METAL ROOF owoo unuur 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com — STUCCO ALUM GLAD NINDC W oEB u S F PAINTED GUTTER �P SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE Client: MTL. RAILING Scott & Leanne Duong 55. GABLE 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net 55 MTL. ROOF STONE BASE A.T.O.G. q-1.a5, STONE BASE E1 REAR ELEVATION - PROPOSED E1 RIC-7HT ELEVATION - PROPOSED A, 5CALE:1/4"=1'-0" A-7 5CALE:1/4"=1'-0" FIN15H PALLET - STONE PANELS AT BASE ROOF FINISH: SMOOTH 5TUGCO 6" 5HIPLAP SIDING EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE EXTERIOR PENDANT -M5 INTERNATIONAL, �� COLOR: WINDOW &DOOR WINDOW &DOOR METAL POSTS & r LOG SEAM" 55 MTL ROOF COLOR: WHITE (FRONT PORCH) AI 111, . Af,PY1.1. �,�„�, , ueonl.\ldoc ❑WicLl A —, ev CIAIII_I I FRONT PORCH/5TEP5 � A— � nA„ 1— �Rllr I VVLVI\7. �ULIVJ/1I'llly I'IVVRLJ "GOAL CANYON" MANUFACTURER: MBCI White Graphite ---_� � f COLOR: CHARCOAL GREY charcoal - -A- - ,e• oc-151 86 FT 1 - WOOD FACIA - COVE GUTTERS -BELOW EAVE5 -WOOD TRIM -3" DOWN5POUT5 ' - PAINT ON BEAD ' M LL 1_I. VLMW&I I`1V 1 I11 I.J rI ' '"�✓• '"�+- ' ""�' ' I\L/"I\ VLVI\ 11�1✓rl VnVLL I\rllLll'/l/ FLOOR FINISH r ; fi - M15G FLASHING BOARD -ATTIC VENTS (SIMILAR TO TUNDRA -SHADOW BOARD sR.¢6 sR152 Hinkle Atlantis Bronze 16 - ��- BM #1603) Bronze 1laxcel Lighting T0749 Hyde Matte Black SEALED IPE WOOD, 6" PLANK -STEEL HANDRAILS & High Dark Sky Outdoor Wall SLATE TILE, GREY P05T5 Vght Park 3 Light Outdoor Pendant W/ CONGEALED FASTENER GROUT • Z O Q O ;Q Z Q U w o O E J N M Q � � z � CO 0 w ry PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-201-f Revision Table No. Date I Description Q � VJ z w CEO 0 0-wQ 0 > ry �wJ w A=7 6ARA6E-REAR Et� � co (E)'X4' WINDOW = ►i rLn REI LACED W/ ' NEA CASEMENT � o I o E4 ,, I I � REFS AGED (E) DOOR RE1PLAGED GAI�R. Do V II Ln 12' E1 6ARA6E-FRONT 4GARAC-7E FLOOR PLAN E1 GARAGE ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE: 1 /4"=V-0" A-8 5GALE:1/4"=1'-0" W E2 Q I Highest Ri& 11'-8 3/161, Top of Nall 8' - 1 " - 10X16" GABLE VE �j STUCCO m 01014w_ - I E1 GARAG A-$ 5CALE:1/4"=1'-0" E - FRONT (*GARAGE - REAR 5GALE:1/4"=1'-0" DECORATIVE L16HT FIXTURE "DARK 5KY COMPLIANT" ARA6E DOOR 1NATERTABLE TRIM 6" T/6 HORZ 51DING i5 MTL. ROOF ,OVE GUTTER 2X6 TRIM STUCCO 3.5" TRIM - DOOR (MATCH GARAGE) 6" T/6 510IN6 E2 GARAGE - LEFT A-$ 56ALE:1/4"=1'-0" GARAGE R 1 G HT 5GALE:1 /4"=1'-0" 3" RND. MTL. GUTTER TO SPLASH BLOCK BELOW — GONG. BIGGS GROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC ,.gIGGSNor SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE C A1- Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net z 0 Q O ;Q z Q U W o o E J a Q 0 � z �m W 0 W ry PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-2011 Revision Table No. Date Description 06 V z z_Q J U) n 0 w w U) w O V Q �0 ry n V �A'-c s b I r �r REAR ELEVATION 0769M 2 EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN A-3 5GALE:1/4"=1'-0" 12 12 5 �5 / FRONT ELEVATION (E) 5WINGING GARAGE DOOR (TO BE REPLACED) P.L. d3 m i 3'-4 1/8" 8, 3'-4 1/8" 14'-b 1 /4" EXISTING GARAGE PLAN & ELEVATIONS 5GALE:1 /4"=1'-0" (F1G�P1-161 T CA41wr I Fc, 51DE ELEVATION BIGGS GROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC ,.gIGGSNor SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE CA Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net Z O Q 0 ;Q Z Q U W o O E J N � Q 0 � Z m w 0 U) w ry PLANNING 5UBMITTAL 10-b-2017 Revision Table No. Date Description ry O O H Z 0 Q Z J �z a- W X W A=3 ►JACENT ,OPERTY (1401 E50TO) 99.52 99,62 12"T GARAGE 1P 00.3' (E) GARAGE FF=100.16 .E 100.07 + 100,00 99.93 99,83 FENCE _ 50.00' S 55°04'00" E OHE OHE S 55°04'00" E 99,87 50.00' 100,5 SAND 100,00 99,89 BOX DECK w (WOOD) o 99.75 99.71 + 99.91 99.68 + STONE WALK 99.95 99.68 99,46 LAWN 9,59 99,86 EL- 99,63 Y J Q w z 0 PLAY LAWN GROUND 99.31 99,13 99,54 ASPHALT 99,41 99,14 99,63 + 99,56 8 9 99,57 + 99,57 PAVERS +99,58 99.50 CRAWLSPACE 99.59 z + — ACCESS J C14 z 99.93 99.58 < CTI THRESHOLD Lirn (Jt N Iv Z 0 O 0 o GAS Cn V METER A 99.1 N FOOTPJINT OF (E) HOU5E o 9+,43 99.60 OUTLINE OF PROPO ED ADDITION 1 98.93 ASPHALT COINER LEVEL)�,I L 98.78 4. CONC. — CURB RIDGE = 118.18' + 99.41 r SUBJECT PROPERTY 98 23 1 (1411 DE50TO) L THRESHOLD 102.90 98,12 99.31 + 99 17 DIRT (E) 99,26 PORCH DIRT 102,68 99,28 99,33 TREE CLUSTER +®99.12 ASPHALT CONCRETE LAWN N 55°04'00" W 98.85 HEDGE 1 0 98.01 3,77 N LAWN 50.00' 98,41 98,35 99.06 98.89 97.87 98,39 98.84 97,91 + 99,06 22"TREE 33"TREE CONCRETE APRON LAWN LAWN /98,63 98.47 97,93 ,® 97.60 CURB 97.62 + 97.22 WATER METER ASPHALT + 9 8.5 7 D E U 0 T 0 + 98.79 5 0 R / W 50.00 E S 55°04'C OHE S 55°'00" E 04'00' )0, 50.00' ADJACENT PROPERTY (1415- DE50TO) ASPHALT + 97.36 A V EN U E + 97.80 + 97.38 SITE PLAN - Existing 5GALE:1 /4"=1'-0" 50.00' N 55°04'00 12"T GARAGE 00.3 (E) GARAGE 100.07 + 100.00 99.93 + Z L w Ut N N 0 0 0 0 r� ADJACENT 99.6 PROPERTY (1401 DE50TO) I 10'-0 3/4"4 9'-2 1/4" fI,' 11'-2 7/8" 1 99,31 99 33 99,28 ri CONCRETE 99,52 99.62 99,50 -F _ 50.00' S 55°04'00" E OHE 55°04'00" E 50.00' I OHE 9 9,8 7 100.5 w 0 23'-1 1/2" ----- ;r b'-11 1/2" 1 199,13 w s 0 98,9 + I z CD 0 5'-11 15/16" m I UPPER FLOOR I o ` N N 0 ADJACENT PROPERTY —+�8.93 (1415 - SUBJECT PROPERTY 8'-3 3/4" DESOTO) (1411 DE50TO) N 5'04'00" W 98 85 ASPHALT D + 98 57 E U 0 T 0 + 98.79 5 0 R / W -, 9q,78 I I 1 I FIRST FLR 1 4'-9 1/16" FIN. EL. 102A 1 9 .23 77 I —J 9d,12 �I + u' m (V 0 + 98.77 N in r t- 50.00' 98.41 98 35 99.06 98,89 97 98,39 87 98 84 97.91 + 99,06 22"TREE 33"TREE CONCRETE APRON LAWN LAWN 98.63 97.93 97.60 98.47 CURB 97,62 97,22 WATER METER ASPHALT + 97.36 A V EN U U + 97.80 + 97,38 2 SITE PLAN -Proposed A-2 SGALE:1/4"=1'-0" S N BIGGS GROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC BI GGS No r SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE C A1- Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net z 0 0 ;Q z Q U L U o ai O E O 0) Q z m W 0 I. LJ PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-2017 Revision Table No. Date Description W ,max W v! C Z Z ��U^j VJ U) 0 5<— I1 w0 m TO P.L. DECLINING HEIGHT ANALYSIS A-5 50ALE:1/4"=1'-0" EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL GLAD WOOD WINDOW FRAME. W/ NAIL FIN EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL WALL STUDS 3 TYPICAL VNINDOVN SECTION A-5 5GALE:1/4"=1'-0" iv DHE 98.87' RAII I1Jr RFI nW 2 PROP05ED ROOF PLAN A-5 5GALE:1/4"=1'-0" L BELOW, TYP. GUTTER ROOF BELOW BIGGS GROUP 3708 Linwood Ave. Oakland, CA. 94602 Phone:510-757-6131 Email: tom.biggs@biggs-group.com GED ARC IN G GS No o � I SIGNATURE 4-30-17 EXP. DATE C A1- Client: Scott & Leanne Duong 1415 Desoto Ave. Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: 310-562-8130 Email: scottduong@verizon.net z 0 Q 0 ;Q z Q U W o ai � o E Q z �m W 0 V ) UW/ ry PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10-6-2011 Revision Table No. Date Description 1 1 00 CD W ry 06 Z VJ z _j z ` f1 rJ J UQ wz r) Q A=5 (50' PLAN R/w) 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" LEGEND KEY NOTES O WALKWAY TO RESIDENCE FRONT DOOR: INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE O2 EXIST. CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN O3 DRIVEWAY: INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE ® PATIO AREA: INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE O5 PROPOSED STEPS/STAIRS © PORCH O7 DECK ® SEATING AREA WITH CONCRETE SEATWALL (18" HIGH MAX) O9 FIRE PIT 10 OUTDOOR KITCHEN/COUNTER 11 PEA GRAVEL PAVING 12 CONCRETE STEP STONES 13 VEHICULAR GATE (3FT HIGH --BLACK CHAIN LINK) TO DRIVEWAY/GARAGE TO REMAIN 14 PEDESTRIAN GATE --WOOD 6FT HIGH TO MATCH ADJACENT FENCING 15 EXISTING WOOD FENCING TO REMAIN --PATCH AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY 16 ROOF/BUILDING OVERHANG 17 EXIST. APPROX 6 INCH WIDE PLANTING STRIP AT PROP LINE/FENCE LINE. REPLACE BRICK EDGING WITH CONCRETE CURB 18 OUTLINE OF NEIGHBOR'S TREE: ACER SP. 19 OUTLINE OF NEIGHBOR'S TALL SHRUB: LIGUSTRUM JAPONICA PLANT LIST ABBREV, BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY MISC. NOTES & REQUIREMENTS TREES ARB MAR Arbutus Marina' Strawberry Tree 24" Box 2 Mult. St. LAU SAR Laurus n. Sarafoga' Hybrid Laurel 24" box 3 5.LlNo. Whorl. Br.1N. Drp. Br.IMatch SHRUBS DIA VAR Djanella tasmanjce 'Vanegata' Variegated Flax Lily 5 G.C. 22 UG TEt( Li usfrum 'a scum Texanum' Japanese Privet 5 G.C. 7 F & B MAN GS Nandine domestica Gulf Stream' Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo 1 G.C. 27 F & B OSM VAR osmanthus twernphyllus 'Vadegatus' Holly -Leaf Osmanthus 5 G.C. 14 F & B/Br. Gr. PHO TT Phormium tenax Tom Thumb'+ Dwarf New Zealand Flax 5 G.C. 65 1 o.c. /Match PHO YW Phormiwn tenex Yellowwet*+ Cream New Zealand Flax 5 G.C. 11 2'-6' o.c. /Match PERENNIALSIBU LBSIANN U ALS HEM BIT Nemerocalks'Eitsyf Evergreen, repeat bloom Daylily I B.R. 10 113ouble fan min., plant at 18" o.c. max. PEN FAI Pennisetum Fairy Tales' Fountain Grass 1 G.C. 24 GROUNDCOVERS DUC IND Duchesnea mdca Indian Mork Strawberry Flats 626 sf Plant at W o.c. FES EB Festuca ovine Elijah Bfue' Blue Fescue 1 G.C. 14 Plant at 17 o.c. TRA JAS Tracheiospermum jasmimdes Star Jasmine 1 G.C. 527 sf Plant at W o.c. LAWN SOD SOD Sodded lawn shall be "BluORye" mix 100% special blend of Trailblazer and Amigo fesoue, 268 sf available through Mello Turf Ranch, (800) 533-2428, or equal. 1. * 1-femerocallls available only from Greenwood Daylilies. 8000 Balcom Canyon Road. Somis, CA 93056, (562) 491 --www.greenwoodgarden.com> 2. + Phormurn t. hy+bdds must be accompanied by a written guarantee stating they are the named cultivar and are stable in size, form and color. Submit to owner and landscape architect. Proof of securement and purchase must also be submitted with in two weeks of award of contract. PLANT LIST AB BREVIATIONS: Note: This list together with the plant list prepared by Taniguchi Landscape Architecture must accompany the contractor's nursery orders) SL Single main, straight, dominant, leader Hi. Br. High branched-4owest limbs held above rootball 5' min. for 15 gallon can 6' min. for X' box trees No Top No topping or pruning of upper branches Br. Gr. Branched to ground F & B Full dense, bushy, vigorous plants, with young growth closely spaced on branches, no oldlwoody plants. N.V.S.-30 deg. Narrow upright vase Shape 30 degrees or less spread In branch/trunk structure N.V.S.45 deg. Narrow upright vase shape 45 degrees or less spread In branch/trunk structure No. Whorl. Br. No closely spaced whirled branches. Select even symmetrical branch distribution Match Matched size, form, caliper, branching and cultivar. Select from one lot, one grower, for guaranteed consistency through life of plants. In general plaids within a group or area are to be matched, unless noted otherwise. T.F. Tree Form S.F. Shrub Form N.F. Narrow upright Form B.R. Bare Root B & B Balled and Burlap Mult. St. Multi stemmed Flat Rooted cuttings from flats at on center distance specified in list. See groundcowrfshrub o.c. planting detail for layout. Cal. Caliper EV. Evergreen G.C. Gallon Can N.C.N. No Common Name Trail' F Select trailing Forms for prostrate growth Veg. Gn Vegetative Grown Hed. F. Hedge Form (clipped) Stem up. Stem up to expose trunk and lower branch pattern o.c. On center N. DrP. Br. No long heavy drooping branohes PROPOSED TREES SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREA X T-,\X � 1 � x DD 0 090 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Existina Tree Summary Number Tree species/Common Name Trunk Diameter (DBH) Height (feet) Spread (feet) Disposition 1 Platanus acerifolia/London Plane Tree 22 50 25 Retain 2 Platanus acerifolia/London Plane Tree 33 50 30 Retain 3 Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 6 20 8 Remove 4 Ilex aquifolium/English Holly multi (4 to 6) 8 5 Remove —overgrown, poor form 5 Betula nigra/River Birch multi (6,4) 18 12 Remove —too close to foundation 6 Betula nigra/River Birch multi (6, 4, 2, 2, 3) 18 12 Remove —too close to foundation 7 Prunus cerasifera 'KV'/Purple Leaf Plum 6 16 14 Remove 8 Acacia melanoxylon/Blackwood Acacia 12 20 15 Remove —growing between buildings 9 Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 5 12 4 Remove 10 Malus sp./Apple (*espaliered on wall) 5* 3' 10* Retain DUONG RESIDENCE 1411 De Soto Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 W co U -j co U) � 00 U) (.0 NO O J O co E O — Q U U� U 00 O � . _ O U (I3 CCCD G O N M L r O CD Q U) > U S"PF 10131/18 Renewal Date S 10/06/17 Q Date F' OF CA\.\FO ISSUE: DESCRIPTION: DATE: 1 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 05/25/17 2 COMMENT RESPONSE 07/14/17 3 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10/06/17 SCALE: As Noted PROJECT NUMBER: TLA#: 17011.000 SHEET TITLE SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO. L-1 PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ©Copyright 2017 TANIGUCHI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DUONG RESIDENCE 50.00' S 55'04'00" E 50.00' 50.00' S 55°04'00" E S 55°04'00" E OHE OHE OHE S 55'04'00" E S 55°04'00" E S 55°04'00" E 50.00 50.00 50.00 , EX SANDBO EX TREE #8 (REMOVE) EX TREE #7 (REMOVE) EX WOOD FENCE@ PL EX WOOD FENCE SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER, TYP EX PLANTING STRI @ FENCELINE EX TREE #6 (REMOVE) EX TREE #5 (REMOVE) EX CONC CURB & PLANTING AREA SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER, TYP 50.00' N 55°04'00" W PLAN EX TREE #4 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY EX TREE #1 D E (E) OARAGE ASPHALT >: ,... DRIVEWAY PLAYARE V STRU TU 0 +I . 0.. ....... M. o 1 S C () RESIDENCE E RE E 1 � 1 :•rp3• YL :• i iT , A PHALT S •♦ iAW,iY. . 4 :' L%A ' DRIVEWAY + ii + ( 5 0 ' SIDEWALK -- LAWN (EXIST) A V EX WOOD FENCE@ PL EX WOOD DECK DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER, TYP STONE WALK EX TREE #9 (REMOVE) EX TREE #10 N (ESPALIERED--"HEDGELIKE" to FORM) STONE WALK SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER, TYP EX TREE #3 (REMOVE) STEPS CONCRETE WALK + EX TREE #2 "" U U U + 50.00' N 55'04'00" W 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" LEGEND EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Existina Tree Sum iary Number Tree species/Common Name Trunk Diameter (DBH) Height (feet) Spread (feet) Disposition 1 Platanus acerifolia/London Plane Tree 22 50 25 Retain 2 Platanus acedfolia/London Plane Tree 33 50 30 Retain 3 Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 6 20 8 Remove 4 Ilex aquifolium/English Holly multi (4 to 6) 8 5 Remove- overgrown, poor form 5 Betula nigra/River Birch multi (6,4) 18 12 Remove —too close to foundation 6 Betula nigra/River Birch multi (6, 4, 2, 2, 3) 18 12 Remove —too close to foundation 7 Prunus cerasifera 'KV'/Purple Leaf Plum 6 16 14 Remove 8 Acacia melanoxylon/Blackwood Acacia 12 20 15 Remove —growing between buildings 9 Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 5 12 4 Remove 10 Malus sp./Apple ('espaliered on wall) 5' 3' 10` Retain 1411 De Soto Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 W U U CL U 00 U) 7 00 U) Q0 CN C) O J O E Q U U UU� O tj .� O CI3 � CC G O CV CO LO It O Cfl Q U) > U �p,ND S CA PF PN I �tjclp =U 10/31/18 Renewal Date S 10/06/17 Q Date F' OF CAI.\F ISSUE: DESCRIPTION: DATE: 1 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 05/25/17 2 COMMENT RESPONSE 07/14/17 3 PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10/06/17 SCALE: As Noted PROJECT NUMBER: TLA#: 17011.000 SHEET TITLE EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO. L-0 PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ©Copyright 2017 TANIGUCHI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Al City of Burlingame Design Review Item No. 8c Regular Action Items Address: 852 Paloma Avenue Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. Applicant and Designer: Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs APN: 029-015-330 Property Owners: Rick and Chandra Lund Lot Area: 5,340 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Description: The existing one-story house with a detached garage is located on an interior lot; it contains 1,814 SF (0.34 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms. The applicant is proposing an addition of a bay window at the front of the house, a 519 SF addition at the rear of the house, and to add a new second story (1,091 SF). Also proposed is removal of the existing detached garage and construction of a new two -car detached garage at the rear 30% of the lot. With the proposed project, the floor area will increase to 3,167 SF (0.59 FAR) where 3,209 SF (0.60 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The number of potential bedrooms is increasing from two to six (5 bedrooms and 1 office room). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. The new detached garage would provide two covered parking spaces (20' wide x 20' deep clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010 (a) (2)); 852 Paloma Avenue Lot Size: 5,340 SF Plans date stamped: October 4, 2011 EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/REQ'D 09/11/17 plans 10/04/17 plans SETBACKS ................................................................................................................................................................................................. Front (1st fir): 19'-6 '/2" 19'-2 '/2" 21'-0 '/2" 15-0" (2"d fir): ................................................................................................................................................................................................. n/a 23'-6'/z" no change 20'-0" Side (left): 3'-1'/2" 3'-1'/2" (to addition) 3'-0" (right): 7'-8'/z " 9'-6" (to addition) no change 3'-0" ................................................................................................................................................................................................: Rear (11t fir): 70'-11'/2" 51'-5" 52'-0" 15'-0" (2nd fir): n/a 51'-5" 52'-0" 20'-0" ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Lot 1910 SF _ 2183 SF 2136 SF 2136 SF Coverage: 35.8% 40.9% 40% 40% ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ FAR: 1814 SF 3204 SF 3167 SF 3209 SF' 0.34 FAR 0.60 FAR 0.59 FAR 0.60 FAR 1 (0.32 x 5340 SF) + 1100 SF + 400 SF = 3209 SF (0.60 FAR) Design Review 852 Paloma Avenue 852 Paloma Avenue Lot Size: 5,340 SF Plans date stamped: October 4, 2017 EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED ALLOWED/REQ'D 09/11/17 plans 10/04/17 plans # of 2 6 no change --- bedrooms: ........ ......... ............ ........ ......... ......... .......... ........ ......... ......... ...... ........ ........ ........ ......... Off -Street existing detached garage proposed to be 2 covered (20' x 20') no change 2 covered (20' x 20) Parking: demolished 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 1 uncovered (9 x 20') ........ ......... Height: ............ 14'-10'/z" " ........ ......... ......... 29'-8" no change 30'-0" ......... DH not applicable ........ ......... ........ .......... complies ........ ......... ......... no change ........ CS 25.26.075 Envelope: Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Engineering, Building, Fire, Parks, and Stormwater Divisions. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on September 25, 2017, the Commission had suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached September 25, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes). Listed below is a summary of the comments made by commissioners at the September 25, 2017 Design Review Study meeting: • Hard time finding justification for the lot coverage variance, the lot being small is not an extraordinary or exceptional circumstance; • The detached garage allows for an additional 400 square feet of floor area inside the house; • Consider alternate design options to maximize the FAR without the need to request a variance for lot coverage; One chimney coming out of a dormer and other chimney being offset is odd; The dormers break up the massing; Well crafted, nicely articulated and detailed. The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans date stamped October 4, 2017, to address the Planning Commission's comments. In summary, the applicant has revised the plans so that a lot coverage variance is no longer needed — the exterior columns and covered area in front of the garage have been removed, the front bay window has been reduced to qualify for the lot coverage and setback exemption, and the first and second floor rear setback has increased by 7-inches. Please refer to the applicant's letter for detailed responses (see attachments). Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4 Design Review 852 Paloma Avenue Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring gable roofs and dormers, asphalt shingle roofing, shingle lap siding, and aluminum clad windows and doors) is compatible with the variety of styles that define the character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 4, 2017, sheets T.0, BMP.1, SP.1;sheets PW.1, PW.2, DM.1; and sheets A.1 through AD.2. 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 3 Design Review 852 Paloma Avenue 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. `Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs, applicant and designer Rick and Chandra Lund, property owners Attachments: September 25, 2017 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant's Response Letter — dated October 2, 2017 Application to the Planning Commission Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 13, 2017 Aerial Photo 11 Monday, September 25, 2017 City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers b. 852 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. (Jesse Geurse, applicant and designer; Rick Lund, property owner) (68 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 852 Paloma Ave - Staff Report and Attachments 852 Paloma Ave - Plans All Commissioners had visited the site. There were no ex parts communications. Senior Planner Hurin provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of Staff.. > Are the uncovered portions of front and rear porch counted towards lot coverage? (Hurin: As long as they are less than 30 inches above grade and is uncovered. The front elevation specifies 29 inches maximum, so it would not be counted.) Chair Gum opened the public hearing. Jesse Geurse represented the applicant, with property owner Chandra Lund. Commission Questions/Comments: > Hard time finding justification for the variance. There needs to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances that apply to this lot, that do not apply to other lots. The lot being small is not an extraordinary circumstance since lot coverage and FAR scale with the lot. The lot coverage and FAR are intended to prevent maxing out the lot. (Geurse: There are five children, and trying to make the bedrooms work.) > The amount of house is causing the lot coverage to be maximized, and the amount of garage, but not the amount of porch. (Geurse: Wants to get the space on the lower level to work properly. Wants to work in a decent -sized house that resembles a one-story to blend in with the neighborhood.) > Hardest part on a variance application is making the case that there is something unique about the lot that is different from any other lots in the neighborhood. The detached garage allows for a larger house since it provides an additional 400 square feet. > Believes there are other design options that would allow maximizing the FAR without needing a lot coverage variance or sacrificing the porch. Could put more square footage on the second floor. > The driveway is narrow. Is it usable? (Lund.: It is narrow but usable.) > Is the space below the dormers inaccessible? (Geurse: Yes.) Is the plate height 10 feet? (Geurse: Yes, the 10-foot plate height is at the intersection of the roof and the ceiling, then pitches down.) Looks like it is designed with space that could be captured later. Also the dormers add to the mass of the house, and the height is already higher than the two-story house to the left. (Geurse: House has the appearance of a one-story house with a high pitch, which is common in Burlingame. Most of the second story is buried in the attic space.) City of Burlingame Page i Printed on 9/27/2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 26, 2017 > Chimney looks odd coming out of the middle of the dormer with windows below it. > Public Works notes the property is in a special flood zone. Has that been mitigated? (Geurse: Yes, using existing foundation and floors. The base flood line is at 16 feet, and the finished floor is currently at 16.7 feet.) > Will there be a pump for storm runoff? If there is a pump it should be located on the plans since it will be external mechanical equipment. (Geurse: Will locate it on the plans.) > Why does the chimney from the family room shift at the second floor? It looks odd to see the chimney come down with a window below. (Geurse: Wanted to tie the chimney against the wall so it is not free floating. It can be relocated.) > Finds the cutline confusing with not showing all the shingles. Would rather see the shingles shown on the elevation to be able to make a judgement. > Has there been thought to landscaping on either side for neighbor privacy? Particularly to the neighbor on the right. Any way to screen the views from the second story to the neighboring house? (Geurse: Neighbor is redesigning their house with a second story as well. The neighbors could discuss whether this is a concern. The driveway is too narrow for landscape screening.) > One chimney is stone, the other is shingle. Is this deliberate? (Geurse: Yes. If the chimney comes out of the ground a solid material is more typical.) > Will the windows in the dormers on the left allow light into the bedrooms? (Geurse: Yes, and also provide more articulation to the left elevation rather than having so much roof.) Public Comments: None. Chair Gum closed the public hearing. Commission Discussion: > Well crafted, nicely articulated and detailed.. > Struggling with the variance. Does not see an extraordinary or exceptional circumstance related to the site. > Likes how the dormers break up the massing of the roof. Agrees with the concept that the second story is tucked underneath the roof springing from the first floor. Without the dormers there would be a lot of expanse of shingles, and the dormers will bring light in. Adding the architectural feature without the additional floor space is analogous to a bay window that is stepped up into. > Chimney on the side is odd, disquieting. > Dormers seem to offer the potential to increase the FAR. > The roof will be framed and the dormers will be overlayed. The floor of the dormers will be the sloping roof below. Section C on Sheet A.7 shows how the dormers are framed. The dormer sits on top of the roof. > The offset chimney and the chimney above the window seem odd. The chimney going through the dormer doesn't work. > (Kane: Variance findings need to be from the unique characteristics of the lot, not the family occupying the house. It is a land use determination that will go with the property regardless of the occupants.) Commissioner Sargent made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to approve Discussion Item Aye: 6 - Gum, Gaul, Terrones, Sargent, Loftis, and Comaroto Absent: 1 - Kelly City of Burlingame Page 2 Prinfed on 9/27/2017 Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 October 2, 2017 City of Burlingame arm: Ameilia Kolokihakaufisi, Planner °�'` ° 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 O C T — 4 2017 re: Response to Planning Commission's comments per meeting CI T Y OF DliRLINGAME on September 25, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting CDD-PLANNING DIV. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning Commission, We thank you for your concerns and suggestions made with regard to our application for design review for the proposed addition to the residence located at 852 Paloma Ave. We too, are architecturally sensitive and very eager to address your concerns. We had responded to your comments either verbally or per plans. We hope that you find the revised project acceptable for approval. Please see below for response to changes. In response to your particular comments and or recommendations: 1. Commissioner Sargent, Gaul, Comaroto, Loftis, Gum and Terrones: "Comment regarding variance lot coverage: a) GCD Response: We had reduced the residence in the rear and removed garage columns to allow for the additional lot coverage for the covered front porch. Variance no longer requested or required. 2. "Commissioner Gaul and Loftis: "Comment regarding chimney stack at shed dormer and at family room. a) GCD Response: Chimney at shed roof at master bedroom removed. Ventless gas fireplace to be used within space. b) GCD Resposse: Chimney at family room. Chimney was removed due to the reason that the stack cannot be placed above the actual fireplace for the reason the above shed roof windows are right above. Instead a direct vent gas fireplace will be used with wall mount exhaust. 3. Commissioner Gum: "Comment regarding driveway and screening for neighbor: a) GCD Response: We had reviewed for possible vegetation along the driveway and concluded that the existing driveway is a bit to narrow to force any type of vegetation along it's path. GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS OCTOBER 2, 2017 4. Commissioner Gual: "Comment regarding stormwater runoff. a) GCD Response: A dry pit is shown on sheet SP.I keynote 29 for additional stormwater run off from addition portion of residence per public works comments. Thank you for this opportunity to further consider our proposed addition. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650-703-61.97 Sincerely, Jesse Geurse Principal COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRINIROSE ROAD " BURLINGAME, CA 94010� p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: R Design Review 94 Variance[K] Parcel #- 029-015-330 - ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other:_ R1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 852 PALOMA AVENUE. BURLINGAME CA APPLICANT PROPERTY Name: Jesse Geurse OWNER Name: Rick Lund Address: 405 Bayswater Avenue Address: 852 Paloma Ave City/State/Zip: Burlingame, Ca. 94010 City/State/Zip: Burlingame, Ca. 94010 Phone: 650-703-6197 Phone: E-mail: jgeurse@sbcglobl.net E-mail: rick.lund@gmail.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Jesse Geurse Address: 405 Bayswater Avenue City/State/Zip: Burlingame, Ca. 94010 Phone: 650-703-6197 E-mail: jgeurse@sbcglobl.net Burlingame Business License #: 22811 Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: 1 hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: First story and new second story addition and new detached garage AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under Wally f perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: 7' 17 q 3 I am aware of the proposed appli t n her - a horize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. 7/17/17 Property owner's signature: f Date:___ EE E® Date submitted: l i it S.IHANDJUL U SIPCApplc7tion.doc L`I CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING D1V Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 852 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-015-330 Description: Request for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Martin Quan Public Works Engineering Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. . Elevation Certificate submitted. Please submit elevation certificate to FEMA for approval. 2. Please shew hew the post GGAStFbIGti9R Will addFess the ad&ienal gterrAAff slue tA the FPMASIP'. PIP -age be awaFe that ne additional qtprm F-RAff Iq allewed fFeFn post eenstFuetian project site.- 3. No further comments. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 1. A remove/replace utilities encroachment permit is required to (1) replace all curb, gutter, driveway and sidewalk fronting site, (2) plug all existing sanitary sewer lateral connections and install a new 4" lateral, (3) all water line connections to city water mains for services or fire line are to be installed per city standard procedures and specification, (4) any other underground utility works within city's right-of-way. 2. Please submit an erosion control plan. This plan shall include, but not limited to, delineation of area of work, show primary and secondary erosion control measures, protection of creek or storm drain inlets, perimeter controls, protections for construction access points, and sediment control measures. Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: 9/25/17 Public Works Engineering Project Address: Description: From: Project Comments — Planning Application 862 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-015-330 Request for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. Rick Caro III Building Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: No Comment The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. 3) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 4) Specify on the plans whether the fireplace is a gas or solid wood -burning device. If the fireplace is a solid wood -burning device clearly state on the plans that the fireplace will meet all requirements as a U.S.EPA Phase II certified wood -burning device. 6) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2016 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 7) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 8) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 852 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-016-330 Description: Request for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Christine Reed Fire Dept. Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. No comments at this time. Fire sprinkler comments already noted. Reviewed By: Christine Reed Date: 7/31/17 650-558-7617 ®URI,INtatt(AE Proiect Comments - Planning Project Address: 862 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-015-330 Description: Request for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. From Bob Disco Parks Division Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: 1. Recommend Trident Maple, Golden Rain Tree or Crape Myrtle in place of Japanese maple for new landscape trees. 2. Please indicate on plans if landscape will remain or be rehabilitated. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches form base of tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Division. (558- 7330) 2. Existing City Street Tree may not be cut, trimmed or removed without permit from Parks Division (558-7330) 3. All new trees shall be double staked with 2" poles and secured with at least two rubber ties or straps. Reviewed By: BD 650.558.7333 bdisco@burlingame.org Date: 8.3.17 Project Comments - Planning Application Project Address: 852 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 029-016-330 Description: Request for Design Review and Lot Coverage Variance for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. From: Carolyn Critz Stormwater Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans with your resubmittal: Project does not create or replace >2,500 square feet of impervious surface. Required Best Management Practices (BMPs) apply to all construction projects utilizing architectural copper. IF APPLICABLE, please read "Requirements for Architectural Copper." A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www flowstobav org/files/newdeveloi)ment/fiversfactsheets/ArchitecturalcopperBMPs.pdf Nothing further needed at this time. The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger) plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay.org/Construction under Construction BMP Brochures: Construction BMP Plan Sheet. For further assistance regarding stormwater, please contact Carolyn Critz, Environmental Compliance Manager, at (650) 342 3727, ext. 118, or carolvn.critzCao veolia.com Reviewed By: Carolyn Critz Date: July 20, 2017 (650) 342 3727, ext. 118 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new di garage at 852 Paloma Avenue Zoned R-1 Rick Lund property owner, APN: 029-015-330: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 23, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15303 (e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review is set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held , on the 231 day of October, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 852 Paloma Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 4, 2017, sheets T.0, BMP.1, SP.1;sheets PW.1, PW.2, DM.1; and sheets A.1 through AD.2. 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review 852 Paloma Avenue Effective November 2, 2017 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13, that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. L W Z O L U 7% ��// O N Q W aE Lu Q)� ° Z V �CD LO _O na C Y z A N E L C M M L_ N O c6 of (6 N C. E E 0 -0 -0 ° O = C Z _ N 7 N C- V m 00 N o c a3i OL O y C � m r� N o c z O_ i-• C O N Q m a 'D c N _ N N O. N O W O E o o L .'C. N C Lco a CL C O (' W N O O .E O O O E 0 Qi 0 O c6 _ _ c o— z Co> (0 CO C C U W� O '^ a o `,� 3 j O cC: O U N� N N O �OQm • E Z v "- �•� Y.e O"� QOL N U (QJWpQo oOs o.E Q� /�\ -O ,C LLZ rCUo^ Q d c E "N O O U N N.V O O O E U�d J V.a�,c CO a UU ) pL r C OC- a N U N O K 3 �L �L a D_ .L-. E (D N C cou- N a)L -C L a (0 p� O W(dJ7EjO_C 2- O N N O.O O N > NN �Ca0 o O Nm a) O � A O C:=c c E •U C E N O U O >OO LL �U am e• • b .� s•. < AMA A •. O!y l .! 19 �d ! 0. S - • r. S<_ O 9 C • • S p O . <p ♦ O r, o, ! �- O d O19 0 � �/ e Ste+ ! 0 <p ^. P �O._ aCA. A °< 0• 1 . °Lip rd0 P 1 !�e, v e� o s a8 Alk 4 4a ti s< p . r. 1p £07 o x, a °. p� e ' ♦ l aF a l Q s y y d 1 � r�• m < m. .♦ !i V O A SIP, S O a ! O 0G 6 . C !O 1p oJ� tea^ 9S G. d � B A B A.6 C OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT AF.F. = 43.24' OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT AT.C. = 43.27' f_O. DBL. PLATES AT DORMER— _ B.O. CLIPPED CIELNG DECLINING HGT. ENVELOPE _ 0 l 0 0 � I✓ NEW SECOND LEVEL FIN. FLR = (16UO) _ T.O. DBL. PLATE AND B.O. CEILING _ B.O. PORCH CEILING NO EAVE SHALL PROJE( 0 TWO FEET OF THE PROPI l � 0 T.O. COLUMN BASE 0 i , EXISTING FIRST LEVEL IN. FLR = (16.70') = Ic,AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE = (15.20) 1 ,gr, AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= (13.60') — l�lU[�]7�CI \II�Iil�ll��aillf� B.O. CLIPPED T.O. DBL PLATES AT DORMERS DECLII�IING I-IGT. ENVELOPE 0 i i✓ ao T SECOND LEVEL FINFLR T.O. DBL PLATE AND B.O. i IING FIRST LEVEL FIN FIR. jRAGE NATURAL GRADE L15.10-0 AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= (13.60) , k 1-1-FRONT ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" ELEVATION -KEYNOTES 1. ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFACTURER: GAF, STYLE TIMBERLINE ULTRA HD SHINGLES -COLOR CHARCOAL CLASS 'B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. USE 1 - LAYER OF BITUTHANE UNDER UNDERLAYMENT FOR ALL ROOF WITH 2:12 SLOPE AND LESS CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2:12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SHINGLE LAP SIDING MANUFACTURER: TBD SIZE IX7 STYLE TBD MATERIAL: COMPOSITE -COLOR TBD SIDING OVER (2) LAYERS OF GRADED" BUILDING PAPER OVER TYVEX OVER PLYWOOD 3. STONE VENEER -MANUFACTURER: ARCH. SUPERSTORE SIZE VARYING 12" X 19" X1-1/2" THICK -STYLE-BEACH 4. DOOR AND WINDOW MANUFACTURER: MARVIN MATERIAL: ALUMINUM CLAD EXTERIOR STYLE TRADITIONAL -COLORTBD SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES 5. EXTERIOR COLUMN MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL SIZE BASE F-8", SHAFT TAPER UP TO 12" WITH CROWN CAP. MATERIAL: WOOD SHAPE ROUND 6. DECORATIVE +42" WOOD GUARDRAIL MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL MATERIAL: WOOD STYLE TRADITIONAL 7. WOOD CORBEL SIZE 6X6 8. WOOD FACIA BOARD AND GUTTER SYSTEM. 9. WOOD WATER TABLE AT ROOF TO WALL INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 10. WOOD BASE WATER TABLE AT WALL TO FOUNDATION INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 11. RECESSED NICHE 12. BELLYBAND SIZE OF BELLY 2X10 WITH 2" WATER TABLE 13. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. TYP. -GUTTER SIZE 5" SINGLE BEAD HALF ROUND DOWNSPOUT:3-1/2" ROUND 14. DECORATIVE CHIMNEY SHROUD AS SHOWN. 15. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING: MANUFACTURER: TBD -STYLE-TBD -COLOR-TBD 16. DECORATIVE RECESSED WOOD NICHE. TYP. 17. WOOD GATES WITH DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON. I& WOOD COMPOSITE GARAGE DOORS. DESIGN AS SHOWN 19. GAS FIREPLACE EXHAUST HOOD. GCLIYSC Conceptual DCS18nS, Inc. 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 E:mail:i8eurse@sbc8loba;net SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 ' CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS LIC : GEUR CO AL DESIGNS, INC. NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06/30/ 017 1 2 A 3 C 4 A A.7 11 Itt II II AM I II i i I1IIIII ,,III II IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII 1 IIIIII II I IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIII IIIIII n A 776 L66-0— J1 I IL L i� 16 SEE SKEET AA FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOU T :S 2-RIGHTSIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) lil■■YI■� I� 1LdUUL=1 10-2-2017 JFG DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEFT. R&SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION CONST. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE ENGINEER DRAWING NO. 1708 AART ASSINK �10 C JOB NO. A 7 DRAWN JFG SCALE AS SHOWN A.4 BY: RELEASEDTO REVIEWED CONSTRUCTION SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" BY: JFG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O Q B A.6 B AG (:B SEE SHEET A.4 FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOUTS 3—REAR ELEVATION (EAST) Q 4 C 3 A 2 1 A.7 AG SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" ELEVATION —KEYNOTES 1. ASPHALT SHINGLES: :GAP, STYLE TIMBERLINE ULTRA HD SHINGLES -COLOR CHARCOAL CLASS 'B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. USE 1 - LAYER OF BITUTHANE UNDER UNDERLAYMENT FOR ALL ROOF WITH 2:12 SLOPE AND LESS CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2:12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SHINGLE LAP SIDING MANUFACTURER: TBD SIZE IX7 STYLE TBD MATERIAL: COMPOSITE -COLOR TBD SIDING OVER (2) LAYERS OF GRADED" BUILDING PAPER OVER TYVEX OVER PLYWOOD 3. STONE VENEER —MANUFACTURER: ARCH. SUPERSTORE SIZE VARYING 12" X 19" X1-1/2" THICK STYLE BEACH 4. DOOR AND WINDOW MANUFACTURER: MARVIN MATERIAL: ALUMINUM CLAD EXTERIOR STYLE TRADITIONAL COLOR TBD SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES 5. EXTERIOR COLUMN MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL SIZE BASE F-8", SHAFT TAPER UP TO 12" WITH CROWN CAP. MATERIAL: WOOD SHAPE ROUND 6. DECORATIVE +42" WOOD GUARDRAIL MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL MATERIAL: WOOD STYLE TRADITIONAL 7. WOOD CORBEL SIZE 6X6 8. WOOD FACIA BOARD AND GUTTER SYSTEM. 9. WOOD WATER TABLE AT ROOF TO WALL INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 10. WOOD BASE WATER TABLE AT WALL TO FOUNDATION INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 11. RECESSED NICHE 12. BELLYBAND SIZE OF BELLY 2X10 WITH 2" WATER TABLE 13. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. TYP. -GUTTER SIZE 5" SINGLE BEAD HALF ROUND DOWNSPOUT:3-1/2" ROUND 14. DECORATIVE CHIMNEY SHROUD AS SHOWN. 15. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING: MANUFACTURER: TBD —STYLE-TBD —COLOR-TBD 16. DECORATIVE RECESSED WOOD NICHE. TYP. 17. WOOD GATES WITH DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON. 18. WOOD COMPOSITE GARAGE DOORS. DESIGN AS SHOWN 19. GAS FIREPLACE EXHAUST HOOD. Geurse Conceptual Desi8ns, Inc. 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 Email: i8eurse@sbc8loba;net SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06, r--• � Ir—.._ r—•-- � it 1111■I■111■I■III i Ir �� 1■I■111■I■111■II■11■I it-----• r---•— I■111111■I■111■I■111■I■111■I■111■I■111■I■111■�■11 I■11 I■I■1N11 L���� i i i � i � � � Imrm �i i II II �mi rl � i � imni �m � rm ml�■ p�� i � i i � � i i m�■mr ii n n m �n■� i i n i�mlli Innr� v�� � � I � I � � i mlmll �I -- rl � - ��i ■I�n� � � � � �m�g i■m - � m�■�.�■�■�� � � � � I �rl�l■I�■ nl � � � "11■111 l I I � Irl■■ i1� � I■I�i�l■1111111■111I111■ L'-- i i i i O mrm■�i A �O r■ni rl i i I■rll------------•i I I�■I■In■-Lill ■1----JIr�im�■■min�m IN ■■■I■IIII■II■1�1■�■1 L� ®� • ■u■Elm�■I■u■�■I■u■�■I■u■�■I■u� nl■■r� I■1■�■I■1■�■I■1■�■I■1■�■I■■ ��■I■u■�■I■u■�■I■u■�■I■ui �r-�I■u■�■I■u■�■I■u■� 11■■I��II ■m�INrl .: � � • : � . C A7 SEE SHEET A.4 FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOUTS 4—LEFTSIDE ELEVATION (NORTH) WE MI "� 40 , i� .4 �_ ft__� (( I IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER INC. CONST. PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DATE A " JOB NO. 1708 A.6 DRAWN JFG BY: REVIEWED SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" BY JPG DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENGINEER DRAWING NO. AART ASSINK SCALE AS SHOWN A.5 RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION -KEYNOTES AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE = (15.20) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F 1. EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES: 2. EXISTING STUCCO FINISH 3. EXISTING ALUMINUM WINDOWS 4. EXISTING CLAY VENT 5. EXISTING STUCCO CHIMNEY 6. EXISTING STUCCO WINDOW AND SILL SURROUND GCLIYSC Conceptual DCS18nS, Inc. SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 Email: i8eurse@sbc8loba;net A B C CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS LIC : GEUR CO AL DESIGNS, INC. NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06/30/ 017 1-1-FRONT ELEVATION (WEST) EXISTING T.O. PARAPET_ EXISTING T.ODBL. PLATE AND B.O. CEILING EXISTING FIRST LEVEL FIN. FIR AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE: AVERAGE TOP OF CURB SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 10-2-2017 JFG I DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEFT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRII'TION CONST. iS:►+/I.yCOMR IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DATE 1708 JOB NO. — DRAWN JFG BY: REVIEWED SCALE 1/4°=1'-0° BY: JFG DRAWING TITLE EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENGINEER I DRAWINGNO. AART ASSINK 2-EXISTING RIGHTSIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) SCALE AS SHOWN RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION EA.4 ELEVATION -KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES: 2. EXISTING STUCCO FINISH 3. EXISTING ALUMINUM WINDOWS 4. EXISTING CLAY VENT 5. EXISTING STUCCO CHIMNEY 6. EXISTING STUCCO WINDOW AND SILL SURROUND GCUYSC Conceptual DCS18nS, Inc. SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 Email: i8eurse@sbc8loba;net C B CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS LIC : GEUR CO AL DESIGNS, INC. NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06/30/ 017 SEE SHEET A.4 FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOUTS 3—EXISTING REAR ELEVATION (EAST) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 0 0 0 0 10-2-2017 JFG I DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEFT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRII'TION CONST. REVISIONS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DATE 1708 JOB NO. DRAWN JFG BY: DRAWING TITLE EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENGINEER I DRAWINGNO. AART ASSINK SEE SHEET A.4 FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOUTS 4—EXISTING LEFTSIDE ELEVATION (NORTH) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" REVIEWED BY: JFG SCALE AS SHOWN RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION EA.5 SITE PLAN KEYNOTES • - City of Burlingame Community ❑evelapment Department Tree List 1. LINE OF EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE. for Private Property Planting Sites 2. EXISTING GARAGE TO BE REMOVED. SEE SHT. DM.1 FOR GCLlYSC C011CC]JtLic11 DCS1�11S, I11C. J 7xeF.CIT1tS,{ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 558-7250 3. NEW FIRST STORY ADDITION SHOWN SHADED. t - 1-4" 4. NEW DETACHED GARAGE SHOWN SHADED. The Residential Design Review Guidelines discuss landscaping and site design under Component Number 9- Landscaping is an integral part of a residential remodel, addition or new construction project. Landscaping should he incorporated into the site design and 28 S.B. 5. NEW SECOND LEVEL FLOOR SHOWN HATCHED. T `. •: should complement the architecture of residence. It can also be useful in reducing the apparent mass of a building by joining It to the - - - . _ 6.LOCATION OF EXISTING GAS METER 405 BdgswaterAve. ground and engaging important archileclural elements. Landscaping can create a sense of privacy, as well as screen additions and taller elements of structures. n �C AN.G.=16.90' 0 P OPERTY LINE S40 25 0 rE 40,00" AN.G.=15.60' 7.LOCATION OFNEW 200AMP ELECTRICAL PANEL AND METER Burlin ame,California94010 8 Planning 'r � �7 - � 8. EXISTING 7'-0" WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVED ON ENTIRE Tel: 650.703.6197 Email: jgeurse@shcglolxz,net Landscaping is one of the required criteria to 5e met as part of the Residential design Guidelines, therefore the Commission requests thal appropriate landscaping be installed as part of a design review project on private property Listed below are several trees pa Conc.Ret. / \ LEFTSIDEOFPROPERTYANDREPLACED WITH NEW WOODFENCE de that are known to have successful growth in Burlingame. These trees would be appropriate choices for private tree plantings in Burlingame. Please note that this list is a reference and does not restrict the planting of other like trees. If you have any questions - �_ �']]--- - - - - - - - _ _ �� / \ 9. LOCATION OF NEW BUILDING ADDRESS. NUMBERSARETOBE SIGNATUREBOX: IQ f ■a a " about planting Irees in the City's planter strip, please contact the Parks Division at 1650) 558-7334 for the street tree planting / AMINIMUM OFONE-HALF INCH STROKE BYTWOAND ONE-HALF NAME.JESSEGEURSE r requirements in the City's right-of-way in front of your property. t / \ INCHES HIGH, AND ARE EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BY i I The trees that are suggested are grouped according to their height as shown in the image below. Small and Medium size are 22 15 O LANDSCAPE FLOOD CONTROLLED BY SENSOR INSTALL PER DATE JUNE8, 2017 recommended for tree plantings on hillside areas where future view obstructions could occur. 20'-0" \ BURLINGAME CODE 18.08.050. 29 \ 10. LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER METER CHANGE METER AND SIZE IN ACCORDANCE TO NEW FIRE PROTECTION CALCULATIONS CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS LIC : GEUR CO AL DESIGNS, INC. \ \ AND PER CITY OF BURLINGAMES PUBLIC WORKS AND FIRE NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06/30/ 017 P4 a 22 0 AR G `M DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. MIN. I" METER 11. NEW MAIN LATERAL FROM METER TO RESIDENCE VERIFY SIZE OF LINE WITH FIRE PROTECTION CALCULATIONS AND APPROVED y 28 / I \ FIRE PROTECTION PLANS. 12. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH PUBLIC WORKS FOR rove f•vw rsr r.ryerus k. all t...errs m lst w z I d=igure l - Tree •. f C, Fmreleoa. ,. yrrlJv roSeael.Tne Plen,r,g nod Cpe 190 F-rds of 11 Ik6an rase .1M. pagr 15l rn zc, O X � II (N) - I O4 REQUIRED WATER LINE FROM CITY MAIN LATERAL TO METER. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED IN LAWN CITY RIGHT AWAY. 13 EXISTING CITY SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 14. NEW SANITARY SEWER AND CLEANOUT PER PUBLIC WORKS rrl�rr rrD H11 2 / REQUIREMENTS. SEE DETAIL SS-1 AND SS-2, SHEET PW.2 EXIST. SITE PHOTO FIST. SITE PHOTO 31 24 15. NEW 4" DIA. DRAINAGE LINE AS SHOWN. DAYLIGHT a I \ I \ (N) \ 0 / THROUGH CURB AS SHOWN IN DETAIL SW-2, SHEET PW.1. ALL ROOF DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO DRAINAGE PIPE _ _ _ _ _ \ DRIVEWAYS 2 24 / PER BURLINGAMES PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS. TYP. AT ALL • - _ y �_ cxy ar aurrngarnc Franrung t7rwsrrrr loin lair for Prware Prolperfv Ranrr,g sme. Small $fee Trees o l \ \ \ 20 / / i DOWNSPOUTS PER ROOFING PLAN. 16. LOCATION CITY STANDARD CURB DRAIN OUTLET. SEE DETAIL SW-2, SHEET PW.1 FORDETAIL. -BOTANICAL MATlltlilTY I \ I O �%" ► t " C�OMMONNAME SHAPE WE LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION NAME FNEURM wavh rpkon Yank paW�rls: moderate growth, roundish anon gknsy.1hree lamed Aw b"Ireranum Tridenr Maps 20-25' R Roca Garden beret. Tall Color n� �° • 24 • \\ I \ \ \ - I - QQ U z 17. NEW LOCATION FORDOUBLECI-IECKVALVEASSEMBLY. SEE W-2780, SHEET PW.1 AND DETAIL 10, SHEET AD.1 -"T"p� Nnekartena - - pdw,ci stow to moderate grpvah: yellow r°w9rs leaves Golden Rmn rrea 2tw35' 1 152e Howrd Avenue refldrch m eprr,�duH-green ,n summer. '" r - ` T k 0 ' • f ` ' j.' i y . 1= '• .: .. i pafvwaua _ _- peril" Pair 6cc luaus moderald yrowih. Spn J fohayn egM green tinged Lagersk°mia Inwca crepe aa;rlle 1rr2o' ` _ 132b Reba Awanue hron-•a red. red fia"m Ady=So oMl ar yell a'.r Fall co�ar. Flnwenng 0" 1236 ea@oa Argue pew��us fast giowtth. wrvirtg, gn eful.-omn hranu,inq panern. Ywloenek 'f'osbino' R ZM Wltrda Rive I,gnl pnk to m.iriy whilu Iragram Ihwers o cony SPnnr} _ _ \ - \ \ III / FTC 23 18. AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER FOR LANDSCAPING WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDER AND INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION. 2013 CGC :,. •+ 't .. :'i -. �� Y Fldwanng pear fi1r Flovrard Arerwe peud�aus fast yrarAh, uyvght kdrrrl; masses of while flowers ire Ppus u,e rtyena 25'-35' l! ArieWcrer _. _ :„2 Ad�k,e tlrtye _ ellrrng. rid If.ares rn I:,li -- � I ® \ � � � cq � w Inc) 4.408 Medium Size Trees _ I _ (N) \ \ I d" _ c, 19. SYMBOL FOR DIRECTION OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PHOTOS. ' , ,. �efY�'` ,• i + BOTANICAL NATl1RITY COMMON NAME SHAPE SITE LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION NAME _ HEIGHT - Deo-d� us vas, early favd headed. dark leaves. � I PATIO \ \I� SEE THIS SHEET FOR PHOTOS. '�• f' E growth. greet, Aesmlur cameo Read H�im"A V R 2712 A&I-e Drift plumes w rn »w , novm s , Ste._. - . _-. f - - 1 ...733 I I \ 20. EXISTING DIRECTION OF SITE DRAINAGE. SEE SURVEY. ` r �' Craernopyrs Decdjwra mpaerale growth; red beings m winter Bond Fail ,,r, narn Wael.ngebn 7hom 21 I Lexington Way I wive. thorns I C'�r.�. - - '� i~ 1 N \ 21. PROVIDE RIP RAP AT FRONT OF PROPERTY FOR MANAGEMENT �. -� Eyergeen modefate Io NV growth, SlIeCrmL"r poi In rpd Eucolypluk Rriwla Red FklvrerMg Gum 2o-ao' ❑ +150 onkud Read er,„,r,,,,n surrl .f, rau„h headed ,-n<m, E ,s rmDo*w w�1a..Lea,w, Ae. w e R �a ant g o a erW. �p ng r� m, ine Ie.I°fed. h i I I \ L - \ I I� I \ \ OF STORM WATER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO BMP.1 FOR ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS REQUIREMENTS DURING � growill can part ro rod headed. dark Raywood 26W Frawrvra mrycalpa Ash 2lr35- a Easton Drive law win CONSTRUCTION. _ - Lveqmoderate gro,Nh; gran Cful Ixandre5 fine Ienlr.red mP-1llora Aaetrahen wfdw 25-W ROW 1IT Fugv apnkremadwayi leaW5. post _ I t3rYewalar Avenue •leaves, Peal hoe fan turn in Fall. \ 22. NEW 24"BOX CRAPE MYRTLE TREE OR A SUBSTITUTE - •, ` •• l3frlglw baba Mmder,[,air see 30.50' ❑�'$ 700 6 sm etock Decojo slow growlh; shaded leaves 1'•daw _ - _., p•YeWIW Avenue spwadc� . almost umbrella form � ' 15 I J I > \ FROM THE APPROVED BURLINGAME TREE LIST. SEE THIS PAGE HpeMautem Inprreata Chinese Flame Tree 20-35' 0 139Ciwnning RI id DecA,ou5 slow to moderate WoyAh rluunrs or rellow flow ,s. tog Ycra,a Raad iean•f yariww n Far. drop late ...... - �ovwre $ . \ \ 23. PLANNING REQUIRED TURNING AND BACKUP RADIUS. \ • Y - - - 7= ' •-� _. q(ggrwNa grgryli>tg Meq.d'a fie' I ?109 Ray Dove Evergreen n,oderale b tool groidh, whao rh. r le 'Samuel Scxrnler _ _ _ Salrhnrn I, to smeNer, _ NA - Prq-s[ia Chinese Prs,ache 50�0' R Decid.ous moderate grow*,. dark 9neen Ises'es, 6rlsiarlt T8M ukx cosy - I II \ 24. NEW CONCRETE SURFACE - \ ::'L.'. - �' - - clJnansn 1i� Avon re _ 121 27 1, \ 1320 brirUAn Meters Deaaa"us moderate growth. cepFery lea.es, IVH *k In wh4e Prrvn� Cereedera PWple Leaf From 20-3V R vrlage Pa k t-frnoor awes rowers I 0 I 25 EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS LESS TI IAN FIVE FEET FROM THE _ • - _•+•. .' _ - - -_ -_ g Rohinis amergim Idaho Lo-&l 30•a0' 0 1416csp.Om Avenue mageuous madera,e w Taal growth: Spm,g dollars al bn M' nwgenb bower: bog Nava s dmded loin wrf WarefsI 3 (� � �JO <� MAI�IU V lit \ PROPERTY LINE WILL BE BUILT OUT OF ONE -HOUR FIRE RATED - - - now_ - S•plam eendana,l Chineaa rarw'rna 35' Rip zofi■ Deysi am Ortre Decfd.rous moderate fo feet growth; dense. round Gumordrng rat [clot. I \--/ _ \ CONSTRUCTION(2013 CBC, TABLE 602. _ rrweel came an sb> am 30 ■w O too rewnla A"I F_VaVeen: moderate fp fast groMh! redd%n.bnlwn nark; WWW, �._ _ ors leathery Ieevos. rose m rs same EucalypWs. AN.G.=15.20' I AN.G.=15.10' 26. NEW LOCATION FOR FIRE RISER FOR FIRE PROTECTION. COORDINATE WITH DESIGN BUILD/ FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY z I 1! • FOR ALL NECESSARY MAIN WATER LINE FROM CITY METER REFER FIRE TO APPROVED RE PROTECTION PLANS - - I SEE SHEET PW.1 25 / 27. GRAVEL SIDEYARD. TYP. SITE PHOTO "Grr EXIST. SITE PHOTO "Cr' ;� ,� ,� '� (N)7'-82"S.B. 28. TYPICAL PLANTEREXIST. WITH WING X 15 ,/ / �/ / // (E) I 29.PROVIDE 4' 0 DRAED WELL. TIE IN GARAGE AND NEW ADDITION DRAINAGE LINES. DRIVEWAY A REMOVE/REPLACE UTILITIES REQUIRED TO (1) REPLACE ALL CURB, G30. UTTER, DRIVEWOACHMENT AY AND cdy or sahrgamr. Planning orvuacn Tree Lay Wr Pnrare P-too ry Pfanfmg S40S I _ 5 SIDEWALK FRONTING SITE, (2) PLUG ALL EXISTING SANITARY 1< Large Size Trees BOTANICAL COMMON NAME MATURfTY SHAPE SITE LOCATIONS DESCRIPTION �I I I Gv SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND INSTALL ANEW 4" LATERAL, (3) ALL WATER LINE CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATER MAINS FOR ■ NAME HEIGHT ' Deadua,a last 9rorAh. lobed green leaves; hnlianl Imf nolor Acer n,hnxn Red Asps 10.50' n +45p C=P+�hlrrd Artrrue �I C 15 � j I SERVICES OR FIRE LINE ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD - - v _ k - -- Ceris aur,Ir.Nn European Nxk6nry �0-W i i lad Cwnbidg r Road � uous: lass growth. gray -green elmdrke haves, broad. uvrgld Celli, s s Chinese Haamary WST I payHdl, each a de iverance Deciduous fall gromil bossy, dark green, alm•IWe leaves. cad. .npatCo w� _ - Deckllronv. 1122 Cep,renkea Avenue Deciduous modest h fee high, open hranr.hes large. - - - - QI ^I I `+�l � � I �p PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATION, (4) ANY OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORKS WITHIN CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY. 31. REHABILITATE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AS REQUIRED. f r✓� ISi'. ❑un[;,y[ rnamea SCafIsl Oak a0.7G RKt g g ncoid Rn Dnve h�if nE yreM leaves hNn aFenat n cold Fall q Ounr.Il, I�dr�.e Red Dak d0.70' 326 Clarerddr, Rand Deciduous- Taal g�arMl; spreaeing branches wdn relarrd uown. - � ° I U /• /• Cora. , Y I 00 - _ - _ .. _ k % -RID Poefan,re nr erdnla Lmdan Rana eo.7o' IJ 40r3 Prynmum Way DacMuoua. Teat growth. Iva'ge lobed maple Us leaves. sheds old _ iSYcamwen�- -. - bark. new hark smnam. Aram cd«ae. Free 8haoae Leon / / j (��jjl I r�-r - //// /� / �j / / / 00 - - _ ,v 1r r µ 111 f id R• Rawrd S - Spreadag a �1 U. Upfigh, 1" N 9'_3- SB. IRRIGATION NOTE ■ __ �..: r w-weaplrg rregular i TO I I � 0 AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLLER FOR �µ tr; lip / I r/ I LANDSCAPING PROVIDED BY THE BUILDER AND INSTALLED AT y � " ""'"'' "" '' "» / �I I / �1 THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION SHALL COMPLY WITH CGC 4.304 . `!,__..� _-!� _. ��•_'; �.'- IAr iaakr [ .xh ,Iw rM+.r•rJ ...... �/// /// // /// 1� PUBLIC WORKS 0 Aj Alln '": weKerr t..,. = I-,. W r i ., art 'I«rx-../L,d41xr1ry Ike 7 c 1) THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION. SEE lr-.T ...�..ay.l4 _,..■._a ..4.. N... w.., ... _ - "-°'"r-R %�+ i L. 11v/ (E)7' 81"SB. w SHEET BMP.1 Q v - r' .-: .';�'; *-• ^ ka.ntng Care Frrendedfnn Fvrves 51 • �2 I L'' + CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT FRONTAGE PUBLIC _ _ w •i r V .:roe 1. ,roo-e rx 59n Frrrnrn. Rgiaoepe sven.IWe ono 1995 l>Itl•n .1rN5. wee 3 1 25 E 3,- _" S.B.26 12 I _ , •- ' ® I IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY AND OTHER APPURTENANT WORK IF AREAS ARE r >v 15 I PORCH PATIO 9 H I 28 U REQUIRED TO BE ALTERED. 2) SEWER BACKWATER PROTECTION CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW SEWER FIXTURE O I I I I x Q PER ORDINANCE NO.1710, THE SEWER BACKWATER rr rr EXIST. SITE PHOTO F rr rr EXIST. SITE PHOTO B CITY OF BURLING�E TREE LIST � 92 ,r, I 17 1 31 1 x U U V) x 3) THE SANITARY SEWER LATERAL (BUILDING SEWER) SHALL BE TESTED PER ORDINANCE CODE CHAPTER 15.12. TESTING 4.0 V) o4 28 2 I r I I (E) (N) 20 (N) DRIVEWAY LAWN I I Q 0 tz � 6 INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTER. A SEWER LATERAL TEST ENCROACHMENT PERMIT Is REQUIRED. 10-2-2017 JFG DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION z � I (N) LAWN 31 WALK I O F" U V, 4) SEE SHEET PW.1 FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC WORKS ��� Oo REQUIREMENTS 5) GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE OBTAINED FROM NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION CONST. 14 O '"Cr b rn DEPART. OF PUBLIC WORKS. REVISIONS c, �, • ; i ,� �. >r ■ ■ 0�7 I j AN.G.=13.80' � � °� 1� I SITE DRAINAGE NOTE IT CISTFIERESPONSBILTIrYAn CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL F - - - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE N40°55`00'W 40 00 FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION s s 2 ��- - - - - 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 4" DIA. PVC. SITE DRAINAGE DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING NORTH AN.G.=13.50' x / B LINE FROM AROUND RESIDENCE TO TO STREET PER CITY OF ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES ,.. A BURLINGAME PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS. TIE ALL ROOF DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY DOWNSPOUTS INTO 4" DRAINAGE LINE TO HAVE POSITIVE BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER Larva 13 10 DRAINAGE TO STREET. ALL WORK AT CITY SIDEWALK AND I• --- II a° II y-Dn w_dy LAW& LAWN CURB IS REQUIRED TO HAVE CITY PERMIT. REPLACED AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED PER DETAILS ON SHEET PW.1 AND PW.2 PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE �n� `�' 2. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS TO BOOT for I�IIR. and I�IIRS. L.UI�D TOP OFCURB=13.60' AVERAGE T.O. TOP Or' CURB =13.60' LOCATIONS. 852 PALOMA AVENUE D CURB=13.60' A A j PALOMA A V E. BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 nTI T,� A PARKS DEPART l�' A V 1 DRAWING TITLE • G F 30 H 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT STREET TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION. i w t C SITE PLAN AND EXISTING SITE PHOTOS DATE ENGINEER. E DRAWING NO. ». ■ ---- --- ----- - - - -- -- - --- ___ -- - - - -------E=-03% - - --- - --- - --- - _ _ _ _ "SSSLOP __ 8"SSSLOPE o.�� -----=-------------- EXISTING CITY T YNOT BE UT - Y .. --- --- ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVED WITHOUT PERMIT FROM PARKS DIVISION (558-7330) - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♦- - - - - - - - 3. NO EXISTING TREE OVER 48 INCHES IN CIRCUMFERENCE AT 54 INCHES FORM BASE OF TREE MAYBE REMOVED WITHOUT A 1708 JOB NO. AART ASSINK -.. r.-. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FROM THE PARKS DIVISION.DRAWN SCALE AS SHOWN SP.1PROTECTED 4. ALL NEW TREES SHALL BE DOUBLE STAKED WITH 2" POLES JFG BY: RELEASEDTO EXIST. SITE PHOTO "EErr EXIST. SITE PHOTO rArr SITE PLAN AND SECURED WITH AT LEAST TWO RUBBER TIES OR STRAPS. REVIEWED 1FG CONSTRUCTION SCALE 1/8"=1'-0" BY: ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES C AZ 0A.54 ELEV. SYMBOL A _ A6 2 1 B A.6 I 3 A.5 ELEV. SYMBOL WON Iq EFAA A A.6 0A.4 2 ELEV. SYMBOL 1. ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFACTURER: GAF, —STYLE: TIMBERLINE ULTRA HD SHINGLES COLOR CHARCOAL CLASS B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. USE 1 - LAYER OF BITUTHANE UNDER UNDERLAYMENf FOR ALL ROOF WITH 2.12 SLOPE AND LESS CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2.12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. TYP. GUTTER SIZE 5" SINGLE BEAD HALFROUND -DOWNSPOUT- 3-1/2" ROUND 3. DECORATIVE CHIlvINEY SHROUD AS SHOWN. 4. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING: MANUFACTURER: TBD STYLE TBD -COLORTBD 5. LINE OF WALL BELOW SAVE AND RAKE 6. GALVANIZED DECORATIVE SQUARE LOW PROFILE GRAVITY ATTIC VENTILATORS: FINISH: PRIME AND PAINT TO MATCH ROOF 7. ROOF FLASHING 24 GA G.I. FLASHING AT ALL ROOF 24 GA G.I. FLASHING AT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS AND CRICKET VALLEYS. PRIME AND PAINT TO MATCH ROOF IN COLOR 8. LOCATION OF REMOTE BLOWER PRIME AND PAINT TO MATCH ROOF IN COLOR 9. NO SAVE SFIALL PROJECT WITHIN TWO FEET OF THE PROPERTY .LINE Geurse Conceptual Desi8ns, Inc. 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 E:mail:i8eurse@sbc8loba;net SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06, U U INC. Z 10-2-2017 JPG I DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION CONST. REVISIONS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER I PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DRAWING TITLE I I ROOF PLAN ELEV. SYMBOL DATE ENGINEER DRAWING NO. 1 /� R B 1708 AART ASSINK A.4 A L A6 C JOB NO. SCALE AS SHOWN A.5 DRAWN JFG BY: RELEASED TO ROOF PLAN RENEWED CONSTRUCTION BY: JFG B A B A.6 C OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT AF.F. = 43.24' OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT AT.C. = 43.27' f_O. DBL. PLATES AT DORMER B.O. CLIPPED CHUNG DECLINING HGT. ENVELOPE I✓ NEW SECOND LEVEL FIN. FLR = (16.LO) T.O. DBL. PLATE AND B.O. CEILING B.O. PORCH CEILING T.O. COLUMN BASE 0 EXISTING FIRST LEVEL IN. RR = (16.70') Ic,AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE = (15.20) AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= (13.60') 0 BUILDING CROSS SECTION - A MAXIMUM OVERALL BUILD. HGT. = B.O. CLIPPED v T.O. DBL PLATES AT DORMERS DECLRNIING HGT. ENVELOPE 0 i i✓ ao NEW SECOND LEVEL FIN. FIR T.O. DBL PLATE AND B.O. i EXISTING FIRST LEVEL FIN. FIR AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE L14.701Z AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= (13.60) ,. 1 2 A 3 C 4 A6 A7 l Cn ELEVATION —KEYNOTES 1. ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFACTURER: GAF, STYLE TIMBERLINE ULTRA HD SHINGLES —COLOR-CHARCOAL CLASS 'B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. USE 1 - LAYER OF BITUTHANE UNDER UNDERLAYMENT FOR ALL ROOF WITH 2:12 SLOPE AND LESS CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2:12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SHINGLE LAP SIDING MANUFACTURER: TBD SIZE IX7 STYLE TBD MATERIAL: COMPOSITE -COLOR TBD SIDING OVER (2) LAYERS OF GRADED" BUILDING PAPER OVER TYVEX OVER PLYWOOD 3. STONE VENEER —MANUFACTURER: ARCH. SUPERSTORE SIZE VARYING 12" X 19" X1-1/2" THICK —STYLE-BEACH cc 0) 4. DOOR AND WINDOW MANUFACTURER: MARVIN MATERIAL: ALUMINUM CLAD EXTERIOR STYLE TRADITIONAL —COLORTBD SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES 5. EXTERIOR COLUMN MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL SIZE BASE F-8", SHAFT TAPER UP TO 12" WITH CROWN CAP. —MATERIAL: WOOD SHAPE ROUND 6. DECORATIVE +42" WOOD GUARDRAIL MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL —MATERIAL: WOOD STYLE TRADITIONAL SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 7. WOOD CORBEL SIZE 6X6 8. WOOD FACIA BOARD AND GUTTER SYSTEM. 9. WOOD WATER TABLE AT ROOF TO WALL INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 10. WOOD BASE WATER TABLEAT WALL TO FOUNDATION INTERSECTION. TYPICAL 11. RECESSED NICHE 12. BELLYBAND SIZE OF BELLY 2X10 WITH 2" WATER TABLE 13. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. TYP. GUTTER SIZE 5" SINGLE BEAD HALF ROUND DOWNSPOUT:3-1/2" ROUND 14. DECORATIVE CHIMNEY SHROUD AS SHOWN. 15. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING: MANUFACTURER: TBD —STYLE-TBD —COLOR-TBD 16. DECORATIVE RECESSED WOOD NICHE. TYP. 17. WOOD GATES WITH DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON. I& WOOD COMPOSITE GARAGE DOORS. DESIGN AS SHOWN 19. GAS FIREPLACE EXHAUST HOOD. Geurse Conceptual Desi8ns, Inc. 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 Email: i8eurse@sbc8loba;net SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE 06, INC. 10-2-2017 JIG I DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JIG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRII'TION CONST. REVISIONS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DATE 1708 JOB NO. DRAWN JFG BY: DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENGINEER I DRAWINGNO. AART ASSINK SCALE AS SHOWN RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION A.6 BUILDING LONGITUDINAL SECTION -B REVIEWED SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" I BY JFG C(:BB A OVERALL BUILD. HGT. = 43.60' CLIPPED CEELING T.O. DBL. PLATES AT DORMERS DECLINING HGT. ENVELOPE 0 l b� N 0o i r SECOND LEVEL FIN. FIR = (16.nO )BL. PLATE AND B.O. CEILING TING FIRST LEVEL FIN. FLR = (16.70') AVERAGE NATURAL GRADEA14.791 AV, AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= (13.60) G AZ 0 1 CM C-BUILDING CROSS SECTION OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT A.F.F. = 43.24' OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT AT.C. = 43.27' T.O. DBL. PLATES AT DORMER B.O. CLIPPED CIELING DECLINING HGT. ENVELOPE I✓ NEW SECOND LEVEL FINFLR-:-jL16.' T.ODBL PLATE AND B.O. CEILI B.O. PORCH CEILING -" 01 l in T.O. COLUMN BASE 0 l EXISTING FIRST LEVEL FIN. FLR = (16.70') AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE = (15.2Q)_0 in AVERAGE TOP OF CURB= 0 l 0 l 0 0 0 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" ELEVATION -KEYNOTES 1. ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFACTURER: GAF, STYLE TIMBERLINE ULTRA HD SHINGLES COLOR CHARCOAL CLASS 'B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. USE 1 - LAYER OF BITUTHANE UNDER UNDERLAYMENT FOR ALL ROOF WITH 2:12 SLOPE AND LESS CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2:12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SHINGLE LAP SIDING MANUFACTURER: TBD SIZE IX7 STYLE TBD MATERIAL: COMPOSITE COLOR TBD SIDING OVER (2) LAYERS OF GRADED" BUILDING PAPER OVER TYVEX OVER PLYWOOD 3. STONE VENEER -MANUFACTURER: ARCH. SUPERSTORE SIZE VARYING 12" X 19" X1-1/2" THICK STYLE BEACH 4. DOOR AND WINDOW MANUFACTURER: MARVIN MATERIAL: ALUMINUM CLAD EXTERIOR STYLE TRADITIONAL -COLORTBD SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES 5. EXTERIOR COLUMN MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL SIZE BASE F-8", SHAFT TAPER UP TO 12" WITH CROWN CAP. MATERIAL: WOOD SHAPE ROUND 6. DECORATIVE +42" WOOD GUARDRAIL MANUFACTURER: TURNCRAFT OR EQUAL MATERIAL: WOOD STYLE TRADITIONAL 7. WOOD CORBEL SIZE 6X6 8. WOOD FACIA BOARD AND GUTTER SYSTEM. 9. WOOD WATER TABLE AT ROOF TO WALL INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 10. WOOD BASE WATER TABLE AT WALL TO FOUNDATION INTERSECTION. TYPICAL. 11. RECESSED NICHE 12. BELLYBAND SIZE OF BELLY 2X10 WITH 2" WATER TABLE 13. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. TYP. -GUTTER SIZE 5" SINGLE BEAD HALF ROUND 3-1/2"ROUND 14. DECORATIVE CHIMNEY SHROUD AS SHOWN. 15. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING: MANUFACTURER: TBD -STYLE-TBD -COLOR-TBD 16. DECORATIVE RECESSED WOOD NICHE. TYP. 17. WOOD GATES WITH DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON. I& WOOD COMPOSITE GARAGE DOORS. DESIGN AS SHOWN 19. GAS FIREPLACE EXHAUST HOOD. GCUYSC Conceptual DCS18nS, Inc. 405 Bayswater Ave. Burlin8ame, California 94010 Tel:650.703.6197 E:mail:i8eurse@sbc8loba;net SIGNATURE BOX: NAME JESSE GEURSE DATE JUNE 8, 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE: 06, G- GARAGE SECTION G2-GARAGE REAR ELEVATION (EAST) L� 10-2-2017 JIG DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE 1/4"=lr-On 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNING DEFT. RE -SUBMISSION 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEPT. SUBMISSION G A.7 NO. DATE BY DESCRR`110N REVISIONS OVERALL RIDGE HEIGHT T.O. DBL. PLA O c0 i 00 00 d TOP OF CONC. SLAB NA RAD SEE SHEE T A.4 FOR TYPICAL MATERIAL CALLOUTS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE COMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER INC. CONST. PROJECT NAME 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE for MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 DATE 1708 JOB NO. — DRAWN JFG BY: DRAWING TITLE SECTION AND GARAGE ELEVATIONS ENGINEER I DRAWINGNO. AART ASSINK SCALE AS SHOWN RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION A.7 G4- GARAGE RIGHTSIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) G3-GARAGE LEFTSIDE ELEVATION (NORTH) SCALEI/4"=1'-0" GI -GARAGE FRONT ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" REVIEWED BY: JFG FRAMING LEGEND FRAMING NOTES GARAGE PLAN NOTES WALL LEGEND G2 A7 G CCU YS e Conceptual Des 18 n S Inc. 2X R.R. 016" O.C.(PER PLAN) FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: 1. FLOOR SHEATHING: 19/32" T&G PLYWOOD. PANEL INDEX = 1. 5" THRESHOLD. -THRESHOLD HEIGHT AT EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL NOT BE EXTERIORWALL 2X6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. ON EXTERIOR WALL ONLY WITH SMOOTH WOOD PANEL SIDING AND MITERED CORNER EDGES O/ 32/16 W/10D NAILS @ 6" AND 10" O.C, FACE GRAIN MORE THAN 7- 3/4" LOWER THAN THE FLOOR LEVEL AT TYVEX O/ PLYWOOD. MINIMUM R-19INSULATION. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F , 2X C.J. 016" O.CVER PLAN) PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS, JOINTS STAGGERED. (UNLESS DOORS SWINGING AWAY FROM THE LANDING AND NOT MORE NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS) THAN 1" AT THE DOORS SWINGING OVER A LANDING. I 12:12 SLOPE 2X F.J. @ 16" O.C.(PER PLAN) ROOF FRAMING NOTES: 2_ MIN. 36" X 36" CONCRETE LANDING. 405 Bay swater Ave. 1. ROOF SHEATHING: 15/32" CDX, PLYWOOD. PANEL INDEX = 32/16 W/ IOD NAILS @ 6" AND IT O.C, FACE GRAIN 3. TAMPER -RESISTANT RECEPTACLES IN DWELLING UNITS. IN I G Burlin8ame, California 94010 P&S POST ABOVE AND STRAP PERPENDICULAR TO RAFTERS, JOINTS STAGGERED. ALL AREAS SPECIFIED , ALL 125 5-20 AMPERE I Tel: 650.703.6197 Email: jgeurse@sbcgloba,net E LISTED -RESIT RECEPTACLES SI-TALL BE LISTED TAMPER�RESISTANT ELECTRICAL LEGEND PA POST ABOVE SHEARWALL LEGEND: RECEPTACLES 406.11 O I SIGNATURE BOX 4. EA MANUAL -ONSENSOR ( I NAME JUNE (2) 2 X 4 C SHEARWALL TYPE PER SCHEDULE MOTION SENSOR THAT WITH CEC 1�19(d) CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE -CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES IN CLOTHES CLOSETS SHALL COMPLY WITH NEC 410-8,1996 NEC ♦ 8, 2017 , DATE JUNE 8, 2017 ' AND SHALL NOT HAVE A CONTROL THAT ALLOWS THE I 4 X 4 POST O5 HOLDOWN TYPE PER SCHEDULE LUMINARIES TO BE TURNED ON AUTOMATICALLY OR THAT HAS AN OVERRIDE ALLOWING THE LUMINARIES TO BE IJ HANGING CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE I CITY OF BURLINGAME BUSINESS LIC : GEUR CO AL DESIGNS, INC. O LENGTH OF SHEAR WALL ALWAYS ON. TYP. NO: 22811, EXPIRATION DATE O6/30/ 017 4 X 6 POST 5. LIGHTS ARE TO BE CONTROLLED BY MOTION SENSOR WITH F FLUORESCENT CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE RIDGE 1. ALL LUMBER SHALL BE DELIVERED SURFACE DRY W/19% INTEGRAL PHOTO CONTROL W G X G POST MAXIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 2. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2X4 STUDS AT 16" O.C. 6. 1-HOUR RATED WALL O 4" DIA ROUND RECESSED INCADESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE (ALL CANS TO BE I.C. RATED) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 12:12 SLOPE ~ G3 G4 U.ON.. SHEARWALL (PER SCHEDULE) 3. FRAMING CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALLOWANCES FOR 7. NEW LOCATION OF NEW ELECTRICAL SUB PANEL. TIE BACK A7 SHEARWALL DESIGNATION MECH/PLUMBING CHASE WAYS WHETHER VERTICAL OR INTO EXISTING MAIN ELECTRICAL PANEL. Q ROUND RECESSED FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE (ALL CANS TO BE I.C. RATED) HORIZONTAL AND SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION W/ 8. SENSOR /PHOTO CONTROL W/ DEFLECTION SHEILD. TYP. a O HOLDOWN DESIGNATION GENERAL, MECHANICAL, AND OR PLUMBING CONTRACTOR 9. NEW GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUT: VAPOR PROOF LIGHT FIXTURE MUST BE U.L APPROVED (ALL CANS TO BE I.C. RATED) (DO NOTIFY ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR DROPPED CEILINGS AND SOFFITS. 5. TWO LAYERS OF GRADE "D" PAPER ARE REQUIRED UNDER SIZE: 5" OG DOWNSPOUT: 4" SQ. SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN. WALL HUNG LIGHT FIXTURE W STUCCO APPLIED OVER WOOD SHEATHING. 10. LINE OF WALL BELOW EAVE AND RAKE. 6. MICRO -LAMS AND PARALAMS SHALL BE PER NER 119 AND SHALL BE FABRICATED IN THE SHOP OF A LICENSED FABRICATOR MANUFACTURERS LOGO SHALL APPEAR ON 11. ASPHALT SHINGLES: -MANUFACTUREI`,' GAP, $ SINGLE PULL SWITCH 12:12 SLOPE - HOLDOWN SCHEDULE BOTH SIDES OF PRODUCT. MICRO -LAMS AND PARALAMS -STYLE TIMBERLINE OCCUPANT SENSOR SHALL BE LOAD TESTED BY MANUFACTURER WHO SHALL SUBMIT LOAD TEST DATA TO THE. BUILDING INSPECTOR 7. FRAMING HARDWARE IS PER "SIMPSON". THERE SHALT. BE -COLOR-CHARCOAL CLASS B' RATING O/ 2 LAYER SBS MODIFIED UNDERLAYMENT. GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTED DUPLEX OUTLET L - - - - - - - - STRAPS HOLDOWN END POSTS BETWEEN HOLDOWN NO SUBSTITUTE USE I - LAYER OF BTTUTI ANE. UNDER UNDERLAYMENT FOR GFI Gl SYMBOL FOUNDATION 8. USE COMMON NAILS AT ALL SIMPSON CONNECTIONS, ALL ALL ROOF WITH 2.12 SLOPE AND LESS SD SMOKE DETECTOR NARD WIRED INTO ELECTRICAL W/ 110 V POWER (WITH I BATTERY BACK-UP) ALARM SHALL SOUND IN ALL A7 FLOORS. DIAPHRAGMS, AND ALL SHEAR WALLS. CONSULT MANUFACTURER OF ASPHALT SHINGLE FOR SLEEPING AREAS 9. CONNECTOR BOLT HOLES SHALL NOT BE MORE THEN 1/16" OVERSIZE INSTALLATION OF SHINGLES ON A 2:12 ROOF SLOPE CONSULT OWNER AND ARCHITECT IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE PRIOR TO FUEL GAS � ELEV. SYMBOL. TYP. OO 4X4 NONE NONE 0. DOUBLED JOIST OR CONTINUOUS SOLID BLOCKING ARE REQUMD UNDER ALL PARALLEL BEARING PARTITIONS INSTALLATION. G)4X4 MST-37 NONE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS 12. DOOR AND WINDOW GARAGE ROOF PLAN -MANUFACTURER- MARVIN INTEGRITY SCALEI/4"=1'_0" -MATERIAL FIBERGLASS CLAD EXTERIOR STYLE: CRAFTSMAN O2 4X4 MST-48 NONE --COLOR STONE WHTTE O4X4 MST -GO NONE SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LTTES 13. LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. INSTALL ALL ELECTRICAL PER ® 4X4 CMST-14X70" NONE MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS. O4X8 CMST-12X80" NONE 14. 30" X 30" ATTIC ACCESS PANEL ONONE FRAMING NOTES O 4X4 HDU-2 NOTE: BEARING WALL STUDS CANNOT BE NOTCHED MORE THAN ® 4X4 HDU-4 25 % OF THIER WIDTH. BORED HOLES CANNOT HAVEA DIAMETER GREATER THAN 40% OF THE STUD WIDTH. O4X4 HDU-5 NOTE LAG BOLTS: PROVIDE LEAD HOLE 40% - 70% OF THREADED SHANK DIA. AND FULL DIA. FOR SMOOTH SHANK 10 4X6 HDU-8 PORTION, 91NDS NOTE: PRE -DRILL JOIST BEFORE CUTTING, NO OVERCUTTING OF JOISTS ALLOWED NOTE: TWO LAYERS OF GRADED" PAPER SHALL BE APPLIED OVERALL WOOD BASE SHEAHTING PE.R(U.B.C. 4706(d)) 1`Z 4X6 HDU-11 NOTE: INSPECTION OF NAILING REQUIRED FOR DRYWALL AND ALL LATH WHEN IN PLACE CORNER BEADS ARE TO BE NAILED. 13 4X8 HDU-14 EARTHQUAKE DESIGN DATA DRYWALL BOARD SPACING TO BE 3/8" MAXIMUM. (U.B.C. 4705) 14 4X8 HDU-12 NOTE DOUBLE JOISTS OR BLOCKING REQ. UNDERALL PARTITIONS. 15 4X8 HDU-19 A) SEISMIC IMNPORTANCE FACTOR 1.00 B) OCCUPANCY CATEGORY. H C) SITE CLASS: D D) Ss = 2.267 S1= 1.085 SHEARWALL SCHEDULE (ASD) E) SDS = 1.51 SD1= 1.09 F) SEISMIC DESIGH CATEGORY: E G) BASIC SEISMIC - FORCE -RESISTING NAILING SHEAR ANCHORAGE MAX SYSTEM: BEARING WALL SYSTEM PANEL SYM TYPE OF SHEATHING ALLOW. H) DESIGN BASE SHEAR= 2.59 K Sg SILL PLATE Q EDGES FIELD TOP PLATE TW FLRS @ LOADS I) SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT (CS) = 0.233 FOUNDATION J) RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR 6.5 K) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE USED: EQUIVALENT LATERAL 7/8" PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER O/ WOVEN OR WELDED 0 WIRE LATH (UNBLKD) W/ 11GA X 1/2" LONG 7/16" DIA. HEAD LTP4 @32" O.C. 16d Nails 5/8" DIA AB. 90#/FT FORCE METHOD Q NAILS OR 16GA STAPLES HAVING 7/8" LONG LEGS 0 6" O.C. 08"O.C. 048"O.C. L) REDUNDANCY FACTOR= 13 GARAGE ROOF FRAMING PLAN ,� SCALE 1/4"= 1 0" GARAGE ELECTRICAL PLAN SCALE 1/4"=1'_0" AB 3/8" STRUCT 1 PLYWOOD 8d @ G" O.C. 8d @ 12" O.C. LTP4@ 24" O.C. 1/4X6" SDS25600 5/8"DIAAB. @ 48" O.C. 200#/FT VERTICAL DESIGN DATA G2 Q @ 1T O.C. A) ROOF LIVE LOAD: 20.00 PSF A7 20' PROPERTYLINE - - - - B) ROOF DEAD LOAD:15.60 PSF - - - C 15/32"STRUCT 1 PLYWOOD 8d @ G" O.C. 8d @ 12" O.C. LTP4 24"O.C. 1/4XU SDS25600 5/8"DIAAB. @ 32" O.C. 280#/FT. C) SNOWLOAD: N/APSF @ 12" O.C. D) FLOOD DESIGN: N/A PSF E) FLOOR LIVE LOAD: 40.00 PSF F) FLOOR DEAD LOAD: 17.10 PSF D 15/32"STRUCT 1 PLYWOOD lOd @ G" O.C. lOd @ 12" O.C. LTP4@ 15' O.C. 1/4X6" SDS2560 @ 4 0 �� 3`�#�T• G) H) I @ 8" O.C. i� 10-2-2017 JFG DESIGN REVIEW RE -SUBMISSION E 1/4X6" 5/8"DIAAB. 510#/FT. WIND DESIGN DATA o 9-8-2017 JFG PLANNINGDEPT. RE -SUBMISSION 15/32" STRUCT I PLYWOOD .. 10d @ 4" OC .. 10d @ 12" OC LTP4@ 12"OC .. SDS25600 @ 6" O.C. @ 16" O.C. A) BASIC WIND SPEED: 110 MPH 20'-0" INTERIOR CLEAR 7-15-2017 JFG PLANNING DEFT. SUBMISSION NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION CONST. 1/4XU B) INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFF: +/_ 0.18 / P 15/32" STRUCT I PLYWOOD IW @ Y O.C. 10d @ 12" O.C. LTP4 @12" O.0 SDS25600 5/8" DIA AB. @ 16" O.C. 665#/FT. C) SURFACE ROUGHNESS: B REVISIONS @ 4" O.C. D) EXPOSURE CATEGORY. B E) IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1 3/8" DIA X 7" LAG 5/8" DIA AB. i Wz IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL G 15/32"STRUCT 1 PLYWOOD lOd @ 2" O.C. IOd @ 12" O.C. LTP4 @8" O.C. BOLTS @ @ 16" O.C. 870#/FT. p o ! a ' TWO CAR GARAGE FIELD CONDITIONS AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AOCUMENTS BEFORE S,ERRORS,OMCOMMENCING ACTIVITIES, ERRORS, OMMISSIONS NORTH ATTIC VENTIL. CALC. 8"DI 3/8" DIA X 7" 15/32" STRUCT 1 PLYWOOD LAG DIA AB. 1330#/FT. G3 A.7 G4 o a A7 OR ANY OTHER INCONSISTENCIES DISCOVERED SHALL IMMEDIATELY 2 SIDES lOd @ 3" O.C. lOd @ 12" O.C. LTP4@ 45" O.C. BOLTS5/8 @ 4" O.C. @ 8"" O.C. c� BE REPORTED TO THE DESIGNER AREA OF ATTIC SPACE =348 SQ.FT. z PROJECT NAME 15/32" STRUCT I PLYWOOD 3//GDIAX 7 5/8" DIA A B I SQUARE FOOT FOR 150 SQUARE FEET OF ATTIC SPACE Q 1ST + 2ND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE 2 SIDES lOd @ 2"O.C. lOd @ 12" O.C. LTP4 @4" O.C. BOLTS @ 8"" O.C. 1740#/FT. REQUIRED VENTILATION = 232 SQ. FT. i 4 \ or @ 4" O.C. MR. and MRS. LUND 852 PALOMA AVENUE SHEARWALL GENERAL NOTES BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TYPE OF VENTS PROVIDED: 12" X 6": LOW PROFILE GRAVITY VENT = .5 SQ. FT. / 1. USE 3X OR (2)-2X FRAMING MEMBERS AT PANEL EDGES AND TOP %BOTTOM PLATES. USE DOUBLE TOP PLATES (TYP. @ WALLS E"F,G,H & J) DRAWING TITLE 2. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION IS REQUIRED @ ALL E, F, G, H, AND J SHEAR WALLS, BY THE ENGINEER 2" DIA EAVE VENT = SQ. FT. OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD, REQUIRED BY LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIALS. .022 GARAGE FLOOR PLANS 3. SEE APPROPRIATE SHEAR WALL TRANSFER DETAILS ON PLANS. VENTILATION PROVIDED: 8'-0" X T-0" GARAGE DOOR X T 0" GARAGE DOOR 4.HOLDOWNS AS INDICATED ON PLANS TO BE LOCATED AT EACH SHEARWALL PANEL _ _ _ _ _8'-0" - DATE ENGINEER DRAWING NO. 5.HOLDOWNS AS INDICATED ON PLANS BETWEEN FLOORS TO BE LOCATED AT EACH END OF EACH PANEL, TO POST OR BEAM BELOW, UNLESS 12" X 6": LOW PROFILE GRAVITY VENT = (6) X .5 SQ. FT. = 3 SQ. Gl AART ASSINK SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS. FT. A7 1708 JOB NO. 6.1/4" THICK X 3 X 3" PLATE WASHERS REQUIRED AT ALL SILL PLATE BOLTING AND AT (1) 2" DIA EAVE VENTS = .022 SQ. FT. @ (1) HOLE PER 33 BAYS = ELEV. SYMBOL. TYP. SCALE AS SHOWN G.1 ALL HOLDOWNS. .726 SQ.FT DRAWN JIG 7. BOLT HOLES FOR HOLDOWNS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1/16" OVERSIZE -INSPECTOR TO VERIFY. BY: RELEASED TO 8, HOLDDOWN CONNECTORS SHALL BE TIGHTENED JUST PRIORTO COVERING WALL. 9. MIN. 3/8" FROM EDGE OF PANEL TO NAILS. VENTILATION PROVIDED =3.726 SQ.FT. /� /� �� GARAGE FOUNDATION PLAN `l GARAGE PLAN REVIEW JFG CONSTRUCTION - SCALE 1/4"=1'r0" _ " SCALE 1/4 -1 �0 BY: g R Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) PROPERTY ADDRESS: 300 Airport Boulevard APN: 026-350-130 APPLICANT/ARCHITECT/DESIGNER: Genzon Investment Group (Applicant), Gensler (Architect) PROPERTY OWNER: Burlingame Point LLC GENERAL PLAN/ZONING: Commercial Uses: Office Use; Bayfront Specific Plan Anza Point Area; Anza Point North (APN) Zoning LOT AREA: 18.13 AC PROJECT DESCRIPTION Burlingame Point is a proposed office/life science campus consisting of four office buildings and an amenities building with a total of 767,000 square feet of floor area on an 18.13 acre site located at 300 Airport Boulevard. The application was approved by the City Council on June 18, 2012. The project consists of two 5-story buildings, one 7-story building, one 8-story building and a 2-story amenities building. The amenities building will include a child care facility, an exercise facility and a cafe/break room. Parking will be provided in a five -story parking structure, in a podium level parking area below the four office buildings, and in smaller parking lots scattered throughout the site. Airport Boulevard will be realigned through the project site. The project also includes public access improvements along the San Francisco Bay frontage and along Sanchez Channel. The site is currently vacant, and formerly contained the Burlingame Drive -In Theater, which was demolished about fifteen years ago. On August 22, 2016 The Burlingame Planning Commission reviewed and approved a Design Review Amendment application and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum to allow design refinements to the previously approved project. The revisions to the design included adjustments to building locations and footprints, changes to building forms and architectural treatments, and refinements to the configuration of amenities and open spaces. REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT The applicant is seeking approval of a Design Review Amendment to allow removal of the private rooftop terraces on two of the four office buildings. The removal of the terraces would allow additional space for rooftop mechanical equipment. Please refer to the letter from the project architect, dated October 5, 2017 (attached). Besides the removal of the two rooftop terraces, no other amendments to the project are proposed. Rooftop terraces would remain on the other two office buildings. 1 911R Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Commercial Design Review: Commercial Design Review is required for the proposed Design Review Amendment. The criteria for Design Review shall be based on the Design Guidelines for the Anza Point Subarea in the Bayfront Specific Plan (attached), and the Burlingame Commercial Design Guidebook. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652 adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows: Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial areas; 2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; 3. On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; 4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and 6. Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations to existing structures are exempt from environmental review. In this instance, the approved project is considered an existing structure for purposes of CEQA. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the initial approval in 2012, and an EIR Addendum was prepared for the Design Review Amendment approved in 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings for accepting the Design Review Amendment. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. The proposed Conditions of Approval are unchanged from those approved by the Planning Commission on August 22, 2016 except for an amendment to Condition of Approval #1 to refer to amendments to 2 611RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Buildings 3 and 4 as indicated on plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped October 5, 2017 (edits shown in tracked changes). At the public hearing the following mitigation measures and conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped July 29, 2016, Sheets: COVER SHEET; 1 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION; 2 SITE PLAN; 3 B1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN; 4 LANDSCAPE SITE SECTIONS - EAST CAMPUS; 5 LANDSCAPE SITE SECTIONS - WEST CAMPUS; 6 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 7 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 8 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 9 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 10 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 11 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 12 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 13 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 14 L5 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 15 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 16 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 17 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 18 L5 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 19 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 20 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 01; 21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 01; 22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 02; 23 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 02; 24 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 25 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 26 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 27 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 28 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 29 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 30 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 31 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 32 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 01 & 02; 33 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 03; 34 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 03; 35 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 04; 36 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 04; 37 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN — GARAGE; 38 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 05 GARAGE; 39 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 05 GARAGE; 40 BUILDING SECTION — GARAGE; 41 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 42 L2 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 43 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 44 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - AMENITY BUILDING; 45 OVERALL GRADING PLAN; 46 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN; with amendments to Buildings 3 and 4 as indicated on plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped October 5, 2017. 2. that prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall return to the Planning Commission with the following FYIs: a. a complete landscape plan indicating size, species, quantities and locations of all plantings; and b. analysis of compliance with Complete Streets provisions; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) 5. that the project shall include installation and maintenance of the Bay Trail and Sanchez Channel improvements as shown in the submitted plans and shall obtain approval from the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) for the work within BCDC jurisdiction; 6. that the project shall include approximately 6,655 square feet of retail use and 19,750 square feet of food service use that may be located in buildings B1, B2 and the amenities building, and Developer shall use its best commercial efforts to lease this space for retail or food service, including recreation - related uses such as bike rentals, and interactive educational space, as the case may be, for two years following issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for each building. Thereafter, any change to the use of the space designated for retail, recreation -related or food service use shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission using the process set out in Municipal Code Sections 25.16.040 through 25.16.085, using the conditional use permit findings as the standard of review; 7. that the following items agreed to by the applicant shall be included as a part of the project: a. Drinking fountains shall be provided as a part of the Bay Trail improvements, and shall include ground -level spouts for dogs. b. The educational nodes provided within the Bay Trail improvements shall include interactive features such as binocular/telescope stands and pictographic educational elements regarding local flora, fauna, marine and wind phenomena. c. The Sanchez Channel open space shall include an area for active use (e.g. frisbee or catch); 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 7, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. an application for a building permit for this project received after December 31, 2013 must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes and adopted City of Burlingame Ordinances unless specific land use provisions for the project were approved by the City of Burlingame prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013. If the Planning Commission has approved the project then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2010 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856 2010. This project must comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance in effect at the time of building permit applications. 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Codes (CBC) which will be employed by the City of Burlingame beginning January 1, 2011. 2) Comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance in effect at the time of Planning Commission approval for this project. 3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 4) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 5) Indicate on the plans that ail work shall be conducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See City of Burlingame Ordinance Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. 4 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) 6) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards or standards in effect at the time of building permit application. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://wvvw.enerov.ca.gov/fitle24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 7) Indicate on the plans that all roofing systems will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2008 California Energy Code. 2008 CEC §151 (f) 12. The 2008 Residential and Non -Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.enerciV.camovititle24/2008standardst. 8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines. 9) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 10) Obtain a survey of the property lines. 11) Indicate on the plans that, at the time of Building Permit application, plans and engineering will be submitted for shoring as required by 2010 CRC, or applicable Building Code, regarding the protection of adjacent property and as required by OSHA. On the plans, indicate that the following will be addressed: a. The walls of the proposed basement shall be properly shored, prior to construction activity. This excavation may need temporary shoring. A competent contractor shall be consulted for recommendations and design of shoring scheme for the excavation. The recommended design type of shoring shall be approved by the engineer of record or soils engineer prior to usage. All appropriate guidelines of OSHA shall be incorporated into the shoring design by the contractor. Where space permits, temporary construction slopes may be utilized in lieu of shoring. Maximum allowable vertical cut for the subject project will be five (5) feet. Beyond that horizontal benches of 5 feet wide will be required. Temporary shores shall not exceed 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). In some areas due to high moisture content / water table, flatter slopes will be required which will be recommended by the soils engineer in the field. C. If shoring is required, specify on the plans whose sole responsibility it is to design and provide adequate shoring, bracing, formwork, etc. as required for the protection of life and property during construction of the building. d. Shoring and bracing shall remain in place until floors, roof, and wall sheathing have been entirely constructed. e. Shoring plans shall be wet -stamped and signed by the engineer -of -record and submitted to the city for review prior to construction. If applicable, include surcharge loads from adjacent structures that are within the zone of influence (45 degree wedge up the slope from the base of the retaining wall) and / or driveway surcharge loads. 12) Indicate on the plans that an OSHA permit will be obtained for the shoring* at the excavation in the basement per CAL / OSHA requirements. See the Cal / OSHA 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) handbook at: http://www.ca-osha.com/pdfpubs/osha userguide.pdf. *Construction Safety Orders : Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Article 6 , Section 1541.1. 13) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 14) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 15) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 16) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 17) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must obtain an address for each structure on the site, acceptable to the Fire Marshal, from the Engineering Department. Note: The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 18) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction C. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Proposed fire separation distances h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered 19) Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing Facilities and Table A - Occupant Load Factor. 20) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for commercial buildings including: a. Accessible paths of travel b. A level landing must be provided on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. C. Accessible countertops d. Accessible bathrooms 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) e. Accessible parking 21) Per CEO 3003.5, all structures four or more stories in height must have at least one elevator that can accommodate a stretcher. See the referenced code section for dimensions (80" x 54") and other details. 22) Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 23) In Assembly occupancies specify aisle widths that comply with Section 1025.9. 24) Specify the total number of parking spaces on site 25) All NEW non-residential buildings must comply with the requirements of AB-2176 Sec. 42911 (c) [2003 — 2004 Montanez) as follows: a. Space for recycling must be a part of the project design in new buildings. A building permit will not be issued unless details are shown on the project plans incorporating adequate storage for collecting and loading recycled materials. 26) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 27) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 9. that the conditions of the NPDES Coordinators February 8, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. The project will need to comply with additional and new Low Impact Development (LID) requirements under the Municipal Regional Permit, C.3 Provisions, which became effective on December 11, 2011. For details and technical guidance on these C.3 requirements visit the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) at http://www/flowstobay.orianas new development.php. b. The following C.3 forms/worksheets have been updated and project proponents will need to use and submit these forms as part of the final construction documents and associated building permits: 1) NPDES Permit Impervious Surface Data Collection Worksheet* 2) C.3 and C.6 Development Review Checklist*. *both forms are available for download at http://www/flowstobay.orcebs new development.php. c. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponents may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) requirement. Electronic file is available for download at httg://www/flowstobay.orq/bs construction. ph (scroll about half -way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). 10. that the conditions of the Parks Supervisor's February 6, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. Submit a Landscape Project Application to the Parks Division in compliance with the Water Conservation in Landscape Ordinance. b. New trees in the Airport Boulevard islands shall be Platanus acerfolia 'Columbia'. 11. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. All buildings shall be equipped with fire alarms, fire sprinklers and standpipes where required by the California Fire Code and the Burlingame Municipal Code. b. Fire Flow and Fire Hydrants shall conform to Appendix B and C of the International Fire Code 2006 Edition. c. Fire apparatus access shall be provided for all buildings in accordance with §503 of the International Fire Code. d. Fire Control Room as required by the California Building Code shall be placed to the exterior of the building with exterior access. Rooms shall be positioned facing fir apparatus access. This requirement may negate exterior remote annunciators and key boxes intended to house HMIS/HMMP as required for Burlingame Municipal Code. e. Please see Burlingame Municipal Code specific to Addressing Requirements and Key Boxes associated with Hazardous Materials. f. The fire department shall request HMIS/HMIP in accordance with the California Fire Code. All inventory lists shall at minimum indicate the hazardous material class and quantities consistent with Table 2703.1.1(1), Title 24 CFC classes and units (i.e.: pounds, gallons, cubic feet at NTP, etc.). g. Space shall be provided within each Highrise for installation of a repeater/receiver antenna and supporting equipment for City Communications. An electrical supply source shall be provided at the antenna/equipment location. Reasonable access shall be provided to City staff contractors for installation of necessary telephone lines and for purposes of installation, maintenance, adjustment and repair of the antenna/equipment. 12. that the conditions of the Public Works Department, Engineering Division's May 8, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. With City approval, the Developer proposes to construct a new, realigned Airport Boulevard through the Project and to construct Bay Trail and Bay frontage improvements in the City's right-of-way easement of the original Airport Boulevard. Developer understands that the underlying fee of the original Airport Boulevard ROW, from the existing Sanchez Chanel 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Bridge East to Fisherman's Park and South from Fisherman's Park to Beach Road, is owned by the State of California, State Lands Commission and that the City only holds a ROW easement over same. Developer shall give the State Lands Commission written notice of its development plans and specifically, notice of the proposed improvements to be constructed in the ROW of the original Airport Boulevard alignment, within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's recommendation of the Project to the City Council. At any time, should State Lands have any concerns over said improvements, object to any aspect of the proposed improvements or initiate any type of administrative or judicial action in regard to these proposed improvements, Developer shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all fees (including attorneys' fees), damages, fines or any other costs of any kind related to such objections, claims or actions. Additionally, the Developer shall obtain letters of no objection to the proposed realignment of Airport Boulevard from all utility companies. The Project Developer shall relocate all existing utilities from within the existing Airport Boulevard roadway to the proposed realigned Airport Boulevard roadway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and affected utility companies. b. The developer shall prepare necessary engineering drawings and construction documents to construct the Sanchez Channel Bridge widening as identified in the existing BCDC permit to provide the necessary width for pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular access along Airport Boulevard. The developer shall complete construction of these improvements at his/her expense These drawings shall be approved by the City Engineer as part of the Building Permit process. c. The developer shall be responsible to meet all San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) requirements for the project and provide the City with documentation of all approvals by BCDC for all work within 100 feet of the shoreline band along the San Francisco Bay and Sanchez drainage channel. d. The developer shall enter into a Site Maintenance Agreement with the City for maintenance of all landscape, sidewalk, medians, and stormwater improvements as well as roadway improvements that do not conform to city standards, such as the proposed roadway intersections. The Site Maintenance Agreement shall be executed prior to the issuance of the Building permit. e. All traffic improvements, including but not limited to traffic signals, pedestrian countdown signals, pedestrian audible signals, signal interconnection hardware, street lights, signage, street markings, etc., shall be approved by the City Engineer and installed at the property owner's expense. The proposed streetlights must conform to current standards which require Beta LED's or equivalent. The developer shall submit and obtain approval of the required engineering drawings and specifications for all public improvements as part of the building permit process. f. The project shall reimburse to the City the operation, maintenance and energy costs of the proposed traffic signals. The City will maintain the newly proposed traffic signal operations. The operation cost of the traffic signal will be adjusted annually by the City based on prevailing costs. The electricity costs will be based on direct billing by PG & E. 01 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) g. The developer shall provide at his/her expense shoreline access, adequate erosion protection and site amenities to the standards established by the City and BCDC. h. The Bay and drainage channel shorelines located on this property will require stabilization improvements to provide flood protection for the public access trail and bridge. All shoreline and drainage channel slope protection measures, need to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The public and facility users shall be safely provided for and protected from the flooding of the site in the event of a disaster. This includes a storm or an earthquake which coincides with a maximum high tide and possible breaching of Sanchez Channel and/or Airport Boulevard levees. The property owner shall employ a qualified engineer to analyze the seismic stability of the Sanchez Channel and Airport Boulevard levees and identify protection against possible earthquake or storm event. The property owner shall submit the structural and seismic stability analysis to the City Engineer for review and approval. If the analysis indicates that improvements are necessary along the project site to provide stability for an event, such improvements shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first building. The developer shall be required to incorporate the following measures into project design in order to reduce the potential impacts of flooding: 1) Necessary tide gates shall be installed in the storm drain system on the project site to prevent high water from back flowing into the site during flood periods; 2) Adequate drainage and pump facilities, including a sound -baffled backup power supply, shall be provided in the parking area to prevent water ponding in excess of ten (10) inches in the event of a 100-year flood; 3) Storm drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate any future settlement of the site, levees and other fill along the site perimeter; 4) A flood contingency plan shall be developed to provide guidelines for management of vehicles in the event of flooding of the parking area; and 5) On -site improvements shall be designed to provide 100-year flood protection. All emergency equipment, generators, controls, and motors shall be located above the 100- year flood elevation. k. The developer shall install a six-inch diameter recycled water main with the roadway improvements. This six-inch line shall extend from the existing Sanchez Channel Bridge east to the other end of the new roadway alignment near Beach Road. Initially the line shall be connected to the City water main and serve as the service connection for irrigation. This line and the irrigation system shall convert to a recycled water line once it becomes available. These improvements shall be done at the property owner's cost and shall be completed in concurrence with the roadway improvements. I. The project developer shall implement and maintain an appropriate Transportation Demand Management measures in accordance with the San Mateo County Congestion Plan to reduce the number of trips generated by this project. 10 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) m. Detailed grading and drainage plans shall be submitted by the project developer for review by the City Engineer at the time of applying for a building permit. n. The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution during and after the construction. In addition, the project developer shall provide all documentation relating to compliance with the Regional Municipal Permit from the State of California Water Resources Board. o. It is possible that this project may require approvals and permits from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Department of Fish and Game, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The applicant must provide written records of contacting the above agencies demonstrating that a permit has been obtained or is not required. p. All street improvements plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval These improvements include but are not limited to sanitary sewer mains and laterals; water mains and services; storm drain mains and inlets; street structural sections, soils report, etc. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations are required for all designs associated with the new road alignment. The road structural section shall be designed to a traffic index of minimum 12.0 and shall withstand vertical displacement due to natural subsurface settlement. The structural section shall be designed for a 20-year life based on recommendations of a professional geotechnical engineer and accompanying soils report. q. The project developer shall perform necessary engineering studies to determine the required capacity and improvements to the system to be approved by the City Engineer. At the City's discretion, the sanitary sewer improvements shall be routed along Airport Boulevard to an existing pump station, thence along Airport Boulevard to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The sanitary sewer system improvements shall be designed and constructed to accommodate the fully built -out conditions of the project and adjacent properties. r. The project shall abandon the existing potable water main located within existing alignment of Airport Boulevard from Fisherman's Park to Beach Road. The project shall evaluate the existing condition of the water main. If necessary and at the City's discretion, the project shall design and construct a new potable water main system along the newly proposed Airport Boulevard from Beach Road to the Sanchez Channel as well as the replace the existing potable water main segment from Sanchez Channel to Fisherman's Park. s. The project shall install purple piping in buildings for future reclaimed water use in building applications. 13. that early demolition, mass excavation, grading, shoring and foundation permits, including permits for installation of indicator/production piles, may be issued in advance of a building permit provided that prior to issuance of such permits, the applicant has submitted construction plans for the project to the Building Division, or has provided evidence that it is having such plans prepared for the project for which the demolition or grading work is intended. Further, building construction permits shall be submitted and received in accordance with the progress of the work which will occur in phases. Permits that may be submitted individually for application may include, but are not limited to, indicator/production piles, mass excavation, shoring, grading, foundations, superstructure, architecture MEP, fire protection, fire alarm, curtain wall, and so forth, subject to the consent of the City's Building Official and the Fire Marshal. Building Permit phasing and scheduling shall be arranged with the 11 911R Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Project Applicant and the Community Development Department — Building Division, such that the work can proceed in an orderly fashion as one continuous phase of construction; 14. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15. Exterior lighting for the project would be designed to meet the requirements of Burlingame Municipal Code Section 18.16.030 (pertaining to light spillage off site in commercial or residential areas), the California Energy Commission, and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America for illumination levels. Compliance with these performance standards would minimize the dispersion of light in a manner that reduces the glow or aurora effect to acceptable and allowable levels. In addition, the project area already contains numerous sources of exterior lighting, and is not adjacent to uses that would be sensitive to light spillover. 16. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 17. that the overall height of the buildings as measured from the top of curb at Airport Boulevard (+ 14.5' elevation) to the top of the mechanical screens shall be no taller than the following heights: Buildings B1 and B2, 97.0', Building 83, 129.0', Building B4, 144.0', Parking Structure, 67.5', and Amenities Building, 49.0'; building heights shall be surveyed at the framing of each floor and at the installation of the mechanical screen and shall be reported to the Building Division as each floor is framed and accepted by the City Engineer before framing of the subsequent floor or roof commences. The elevator overruns and associated structures shall be permitted to exceed the stated height limits to the degree that such exceedance is necessitated by the Uniform Building Code in order for elevators to serve their intended purpose of providing access by persons to the rooftop terraces on the buildings. The entire building height of each structure shall be surveyed to confirm conformance with the approved plans and conditions of approval before scheduling the final framing inspection. If the building does not conform at any point in the construction process, it shall be made to conform before construction continues and any further city inspections shall be scheduled (Building Division); 18. that the applicant shall pay the required Bayfront Development Fee based on the square footage of the buildings and the current rate adjusted for inflation, the total fee due is calculated to be $1,695,070.00. Per the development agreement, one-half of the fee is due at the time of issuance of the first City Building Permit for construction of a building, and one-half is due before the final framing inspection is scheduled, for each Development Phase. The fee due shall be offset by the actual costs incurred by Developer in designing, preparing, installing and constructing (a) the realignment and widening of Airport Boulevard but limited to the customary and ordinary costs for such improvements without special pedestrian treatments, and (b) the Sanchez Channel bridge widening as outlined in the Development Agreement (Planning Division); 19. that the applicant shall pay the required public facilities impact fees based on the square footage of the buildings, and that the Parks and Recreation fee ($131,924.00) and the Storm Drain Fee ($549,939.00) shall be waived, the total remaining fee due shall be $1,102,179.00. The remaining fees shall be payable by development phase, and shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the 12 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) issuance of the first building permit for construction of each building as follows: Building 61: $209,802.00, Building 62: $209,802.00, Building B3: $293,722.80, Building B4, $335,683.20, and Amenities Center: $53,169.00 (Planning Division): 20. that the property owner shall be responsible to see that small delivery trucks or vans making periodic deliveries are on -site only during office hours; no trucks, recreation vehicles or other vehicles shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight, and no parking shall be leased to tenants or any other users for any purpose, 21. that the property owner shall comply with the Transportation Demand Management Program prepared by Fehr and Peers for 350 Beach Road, LLC dated April 6, 2011 including the following measures: a. Secure Bicycle Storage: Secure, indoor bicycle storage for at least 26 bicycles shall be provided in a lobby or garage level room within each of the four office buildings. In addition, bicycle racks for up to 50 bicycles will be located outside of Buildings #1 or #4. b. Showers and Changing Rooms: Shower facilities with changing rooms shall be provided throughout the site, with access available to all employees. Shower facilities (two men's and two women's) and changing rooms (one men's and one women's) shall be provided in each of the four office buildings, the amenities center shall include 12 showers and two changing rooms. c. Shuttle Service: Coordinate with the Peninsula Commuter Alliance to add two stops within the project site to the existing commuter shuttle from the Millbrae Intermodal Station. The shuttle provides 10-minute headways during peak periods. d. Carpool Parking: Provide 15 preferential parking spaces for carpools at each of the four office buildings. e. Vanpool Parking: Provide two preferential parking spaces for vanpools at each of the four office buildings. f. Commute Assistance Center: 1) Provide an on -site one -stop shopping for transit and commute alternatives information. 2) Provide a part-time on -site TDM coordinator available to assist building tenants with trip planning. g. Employees' Surveys: The TDM coordinator shall develop and administer two surveys per year to examine TDM program participation and best practices. h. Video Conferencing Center: One video conferencing center of approximately 8500 sf shall be installed for use by the tenants of the facility. i. On -Site Amenities/Accommodations: On -site amenities, including banking, retail, delivery dry cleaning, exercise facilities, child care center, delivery pharmacy and food service shall be provided at the project site to encourage people to stay on site during the work day; j. On -Site Bicycles for Employee Use- Bicycles shall be provided at each office building. Employees will have access to bicycles during breaks for personal or business use. 13 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) k. Child Care Services: Child care center service shall be provided on site; I. Guaranteed Ride Home Program: Employees will have access to the Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program administered by the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance) for emergencies. The program provides vouchers for taxicabs or rental cars for this purpose. m. Transportation Action Plan: The TDM coordinator shall work with the Alliance to create a Transportation Action Plan for each tenant. n. Transportation Management Association: If the office park has multiple tenants, each tenant shall provide a representative to form a Transportation Management Association and be a liaison to the TDM Coordinator. o. Coordination of Transportation Demand Management Programs: The TDM coordinator shall coordinate with other TDM programs with existing developments/employers in the surrounding area. p. Subsidy for Transit Tickets: Employers shall offer subsidies to employees to compensate them for the cost of transit tickets. q. Electric Vehicle Stations: The applicant shall provide plug-in stations for electric vehicles. r. House Car for Employee Use: Each building will provide employees with access to a "house car" for use during the day. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 22. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 23. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 24. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Mitigation Measures from Environmental Impact Report: Measures Applicable to 300 Airport Boulevard Project as well as future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard site: 25. Amphlett Poplar Intersection: The City of San Mateo is considering a range of potential improvements at the Amphlett Boulevard/Poplar Avenue intersection to provide sufficient capacity for existing and future traffic volume. However, a specific improvement project has not been identified at this time. The 14 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Project Sponsor, and any future project sponsor for development of the 350 Airport Boulevard site, shall negotiate an agreement with the City of San Mateo to make a fair share contribution toward the cost of improvements at this intersection for each projects respective impacts (Transportation, Planning, Public Works, City of San Mateo); 26. Implement Recommended Dust Control Measures. To reduce particulate matter emissions during Project excavation and construction phases, the Project contractor(s) shall comply with the dust control strategies developed by BAAQMD. The Project Sponsor shall include in all construction contracts the following requirements or measures: • All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. • All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. • Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. (Air Quality; (Planning and Building Divisions); 27. Construction Equipment Emissions Minimization. To reduce the potential impacts resulting from Project construction activities, the Project Sponsor shall include in contract specifications a requirement for the following measures: Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to two minutes; The Project shall develop a construction plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment (more than 50 horsepower) to be used in the construction Project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles) would achieve a Project wide fleet -average 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent PM reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average (as specified in California Code of Regulations Article 4.8, Section 2449 General Requirements for In -Use Off - Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets). Acceptable options for reducing emissions include the use of late 15 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) model engines, low -emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after - treatment products, add -on devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such become available; All construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators shall be equipped with Best Available Control Technology for emission reductions of NOx and PM; • Use of Interim Tier 4, if applicable, or equivalent equipment for all uses where such equipment is available; • Use of Tier 3 equipment with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) or alternative fuel vehicles for applications where Tier 4 Interim engines are not available; • Prohibition of diesel generators for construction purposes where feasible alternative sources of power are available; • All construction equipment shall be maintained in proper working condition in accordance with manufacturer's specifications; • Diesel -powered construction equipment shall comply with BAAQMD requirements or meet Tier 3 or Tier 4 EPA/CARB standards; and • To the extent feasible, the existing electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction sites shall be used rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines. (Air Quality, Planning and Building Divisions) 28. Application of Low-VOC Coatings. The Project Sponsor shall use low VOC (i.e., ROG) coatings beyond the local requirements as per the BAAQMD Guideline (i.e., Regulation a Rule 3: Architectural Coatings) (Air Quality, Planning and Building Divisions); 29. Implement Best Management Practices to Reduce Construction Noise. The following BMPs shall be incorporated into the construction documents to be implemented by the Project contractor. a. Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: i. Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; ii. Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound bafflers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; iii. Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and iv. Minimize backing movements of equipment. b. Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. c. Impact equipment (e.g., jack hammers and pavement breakers) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically -powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be 16 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible. d. Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. e. Select routes for movement of construction -related vehicles and equipment in conjunction with the Burlingame Planning Division so that noise -sensitive areas, including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible. The project sponsor shall designate a "disturbance coordinator for construction activities. The coordinator would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration. The coordinator would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 30. Notifv Nearbv Businesses of Construction Activities that Could Affect Vibration -Sensitive Eauiament. The Project Sponsor shall provide notification to adjacent property owners and occupants, prior to the start of construction, informing them of the estimated start date and duration of vibration - generating construction activities during site preparation, grading, and pile driving, if required. This notification shall include information warning about the potential for impacts related to vibration - sensitive equipment. The Project Sponsor shall identify a phone number for the property owners and occupants to call if they have vibration -sensitive equipment on their site. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 31. Implement Construction BMPs to Reduce Construction Vibration. The Project Sponsor shall implement the following measures during construction of all Project components: • To the extent feasible, construction activities that could generate high vibration levels at any identified vibration -sensitive locations shall be scheduled during times that would have the least impact on nearby land uses. This could include restricting construction activities in the areas of potential impact to the early and late hours of the work day, such as from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 am. or 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday. • Stationary sources, such as construction staging areas and temporary generators, shall be located as far from nearby vibration -sensitive receptors as possible. • Trucks shall be prohibited from idling along streets serving the construction site where vibration - sensitive equipment is located. • Avoid pile driving when possible within 100 feet of an existing structure. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 32. Implement Alternative Pile Driving Methods. The Project Sponsor shall use alternative pile driving methods (e.g., drilled or steel piles) for piles driven in proximity to existing vibration receptors such that vibration levels at vibration -sensitive equipment shall not exceed 65 VdB. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 33. Bird Nest Pre -Construction Survey. The Project Sponsor(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction breeding -season surveys (approximately March 15 through August 30) of 17 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) the Project Site and immediate vicinity during the same calendar year that construction is planned to begin, in consultation with the CDFG as discussed below. If phased construction procedures are planned for the Project, the results of the above survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. A report shall be submitted to CDFG, following the completion of the bird nesting survey that includes, at a minimum, the following information: • A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted. • A map showing the location(s) of any bird nests observed on the Project Site. If the above survey does not identify any nesting bird species on the Project Site, no further mitigation would be required. However, should any active bird nests be located on the Project Site, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. (Biological Resources, Planning Division); 34. Bird Nest Buffer Zone. The Project Sponsor(s), in consultation with CDFG, shall delay construction in the vicinity of active bird nest sites located on or adjacent to the Project Site during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. If active nests are identified, construction activities should not occur within 500 ft of the nest. A qualified biologist shall monitor the active nest until the young have fledged, until the biologist determines that the nest is no longer active, or if it is reasonable that construction activities are not disturbing nesting behaviors. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 35. In order to reduce significant impacts to the City's wastewater conveyance and treatment system associated with the Project, the Proiect Sponsor shall adhere to either of the two following mitigation measures.. a. Uoarade Puma Capacity at the Existina 399 Rollins Road Pump Station and Reduce Inflow and Infiltration within the Wastewater System. The Project Sponsor(s) shall contribute fair -share funds toward the upgrade of the 399 RRPS capacity, or equivalent project to increase capacity in the system, to accommodate the increased PWWF that would result from implementation of the Project. Additionally, the Project Sponsor(s) shall rehabilitate the existing wastewater system, where necessary, to reduce inflow and infiltration that contributes to PWWFs at the WWTP in an amount concomitant with increases in flows contributed by the 300 Airport Boulevard Project. b. Upgrade to the Existing Airport Boulevard Conveyance System Variant to Rollins Road Pump Station Upgrade. The Project Sponsor(s) shall coordinate with the City of Burlingame Public Works Department to upgrade the capacity of the City's wastewater conveyance and treatment system to accommodate the increased PWWF that would result from implementation of development of the 300 and 350 Airport Boulevard Sites. Such measures could include, as necessary, installation of a new pump station within public right of way or other area near the Sanchez Channel Bridge on the Project Site, upgrade the capacity of the existing Airport Boulevard Pump Station, extension of wastewater lines across Sanchez Channel, via attachment to the Sanchez Channel Bridge, to tie into existing wastewater lines under Airport Boulevard west of the Project Site, and increasing, as required, the capacity of existing gravity lines between the Project. 18 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Site and the Airport Boulevard Pump Station and existing force main between the Airport Boulevard Pump Station and the WWrp. The Project Sponsor shall construct the necessary improvements to serve the Project Site and additional properties along Airport Boulevard that would connect to this sewer line. (Utilities, Public Works Department); 36. Undiscovered Cultural Resources. If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guideline Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden'), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction -related earth -moving activities, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame shall be notified. The Project Sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The City of Burlingame shall consult with the archeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less -than - significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. 37. Unique Paleontological/Geological Features. Should a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature be identified at the project construction site during any phase of construction, the Project manager shall cease all construction activities at the site of the discovery and immediately notify the City of Burlingame. The Project Sponsor shall retain a qualified paleontologist to provide an evaluation of the find and to prescribe mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less - than -significant level. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources or geologic features is carried out. The Project Sponsor shall be responsible for implementing any additional mitigation measures prescribed by the paleontologist and approved by the City. 38. Human Remains. If human remains are discovered at any Project construction site during any phase of construction, all ground -disturbing activity 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame and the San Mateo County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The Project Sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City of Burlingame shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project applicant shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City of Burlingame, before the resumption of ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. 19 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE 300 AIRPORT BLVD. PROJECT 39. Reduce Risk of Exposure During Construction. If the childcare center is operational during the construction of Phase 2 of the Project, one of the following shall be implemented: a. A Health Risk Assessment is conducted prior to commencement of construction of Phase 11 that demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the BAAQMD, that impacts to the children at the childcare center are less than significant during Phase II construction or specific sub phases of Phase ll construction; or b. Implement the following building design and operational restrictions. The childcare center building shall be designed such that the air intake would be located at the far eastern edge of the building with the air intake facing east. 2. A MERV 15 or higher rated filter shall be installed and operated for at least the duration of construction activities. The MERV 15 or higher rated filters have the potential to remove up to 85 percent of particles of 2.5 microns or greater thereby reducing interior levels of pollutants. 3. All outdoor activities at the childcare center shall be suspended while construction activities are occurring. If implementation of this Mitigation Measure is infeasible, then the childcare center would be prohibited from operating during Phase 11 construction. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 40. Maintenance and Testing of Generators. As part of the conditions of operation for the onsite back-up generators, all diesel emissions associated with the maintenance and testing of the generators should be conducted at such times as the daycare center is not in operation, particularly nights and weekends. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 41. Implementation of MERV 15 Filters. The Project Sponsor shall consider implementing MERV 15 or higher rated filters for the amenities building. This would further reduce exposure of daycare students to emissions from US 101. The MERV 15 or higher rated filters have the potential to remove up to 85 percent of PM2.5 and would reduce risk while students were inside the building. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 42. Incorporate GHG Reduction Measures for Maintenance Activities. The Project Sponsor shall provide infrastructure for the use of electric landscape equipment during landscaping activities, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 43. Incorporate Trees and Vegetation into Proiect Design. Trees and other shade structures shall be incorporated into the Site Plan to maximize summer shade and to minimize winter shade. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 44. Renewable Energy System. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall offset 10 percent of project electricity demand through implementation of onsite renewable energy systems or through investment in offsite alternative energy systems. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 20 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) 45. Drought Tolerant Landscaping. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce irrigation -related water demand by a minimum of 10 percent through the implementation of drought tolerant landscaping. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 46. Cool Roof Material. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall incorporate cool -roof materials into project design to reduce electricity demand associated with building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) by a minimum of 7 percent. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 47. Water Conservation Measures. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement immediate water conservation measures to reduce building water demand by 33 percent. Building water demand shall ultimately be reduced by 50 percent when the City's recycled water system is implemented. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 48. Energy Efficiency beyond Title 24 Standards. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce building energy demand beyond the 2005 Title 24 Standards by 26 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 49. Operation Solid Waste Reduction. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement a solid waste reduction program to reduce operational solid waste by a minimum of 10 percent (Climate Change, Planning Division); 50. Utilize Alternative Fueled Vehicles and Local Building Materials. In accordance with BAAQMD BMPs, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate into the construction fleet a minimum of 15 percent of construction vehicles and equipment operated by alternative fuels. Further, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that a minimum of 10 percent of building materials are locally sourced, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 51. Conduct a Wetland Delineation. The Project Sponsor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a wetland delineation of the Project Site. This delineation shall be submitted to the Corps for verification prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the Project. If the Corps determines that the features in the Project Site are not jurisdictional, then no further mitigation would be required. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 52. Obtain Applicable Permits and Certifications. If the Corps determines that these features are jurisdictional, then the Project Sponsor must obtain a C WA Section 404 permit from the Corps, and a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB prior to issuance of any grading permits for the Project. A requirement of the permits will be compensation such that there is no net loss of wetlands. This compensation requirement can be satisfied through avoidance, onsite and/or offsite construction and preservation of wetlands or by purchase of mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. At certified mitigation banks, the Corps typically requires a minimum 1:1 ratio, but may require higher ratios for certain wetland types. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 53. Provide Flood Protection up to the 100-Year Flood Event plus Sea Level Rise for Underground Structures. To protect underground structures from sea level rise flood risks, prior to approving grading and/or building permits the City shall ensure that the project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements into all applicable project features using a flood elevation of at 21 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) least 7.1 feet. All below -ground structures, including storm drains, sewers, equipment facilities, and others, shall be flood proofed and designed to withstand hydrostatic forces and buoyancy from water surface elevations up to 7.1 feet in elevation. Certain portions of the shoreline open space may not be protected at the ultimate level of flooding, given proposed heights. However, developed areas of the Project would be protected. For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be developed to address end -of -century conditions. (Hydrology, Building Division and Public Works Department); 54. Provide Adequate Storm Flow Conveyance Capacity for Sea Level Rise Conditions. To ensure that the storm drain system conveyance capacity is not constricted by sea level rise at the outlets, the Project Sponsor shall design the storm drain system to adequately convey stormwater runoff at outlet water surface elevations equivalent to the 100-year flood event base elevation plus sea level rise of 55 inches (water surface elevation of 11.6 feet at the outlet). Prior to receiving a grading permit, the City shall review project designs and studies for adequacy of storm flow conveyance with an outlet surface water elevation of 11.6 feet and in accordance with City design standards. The City shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. The Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City Conditions of Approval into project designs, prior to receiving a grading permit. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 55. Provide Protection of Shoreline and Flood Protection Features from Hvdrodvnamic Forces from Sea Level Rise Conditions. Prior to receiving a grading permit, in order to ensure that the shoreline and flood protection features associated with the proposed project provide protection under sea level rise hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic conditions, the Project Sponsor shall prepare engineering studies to identify expected hydrodynamic forces for under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet and hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be implemented to address end -of -century conditions. The Project Sponsor shall design shoreline and flood protection features that could accommodate hydrodynamic forces from sea level rise conditions along wherever flood protection features are identified under Mitigation Measure HY-7.1 and at shoreline protection features for stability and integrity under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The Project Sponsor shall also design flood protection features for protection against hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). The City shall review designs and associated studies for conformance with City requirements and adequacy of design measures to withstand hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces associated with the design criteria. The Project Sponsor shall also design erosion protection along the shoreline set -back area for protection under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The City shall review designs and associated studies for adequacy in protecting the shoreline set -back area under these conditions. The City Public Works Department shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. Prior to receiving a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City and BCDC Conditions of Approval into project designs. 22 911R Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE TO THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 350 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SITE 56. Implement TDM Program as part of 350 Airport Boulevard Project. These measures could include: secure bicycle storage, showers and changing rooms, shuttle service, preferential parking for carpoolers, preferential parking for vanpoolers, commute assistance center, employees' surveys, video conferencing centers, on -site amenities accommodations, on -site bicycles for employees, child care services, guaranteed ride home program, transportation action plan, transportation management association, and coordination of TDM programs (Air Quality, Planning Division); 57. Implement enemy efficiency measures with 350 Airport Boulevard Protect. These measures could include: LEED certification or to exceed energy efficiency beyond Title 24 requirements which would further aid in reducing stationary source emissions (Air Quality; Planning and Building Divisions); 58. Incorporate GHG Reduction Measures for Maintenance Activities. The Project Sponsor shall provide infrastructure for the use of electric landscape equipment during landscaping activities, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 59. Incorporate Trees and Vegetation into Project Design. Trees and other shade structures shall be incorporated into the Site Plan to maximize summer shade and to minimize winter shade. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 60. Renewable Energy System. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall offset 10 percent of project electricity demand through implementation of onsite renewable energy systems or through investment in offsite alternative energy systems. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 61. Drought Tolerant Landscaping. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce irrigation -related water demand by a minimum of 10 percent through the implementation of drought tolerant landscaping. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 62. Cool Roof Material. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall incorporate cool -roof materials into project design to reduce electricity demand associated with building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) by a minimum of 7 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 63. Water Conservation Measures. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement immediate water conservation measures to reduce building water demand by 33 percent. Building water demand shall ultimately be reduced by 50 percent when the City's recycled water system is implemented. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 64. Enemy Efficiency beyond Title 24 Standards. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce building energy demand beyond the 2005 Title 24 Standards by 26 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 65. Operation Solid Waste Reduction. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement a solid waste reduction program to reduce operational solid waste by a minimum of 10 percent. (Climate Change, Planning Division); 23 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) 66. Implement a TDM program. The Project Sponsor shall ensure that future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site implement a TOM program similar to that described for the 300 Airport Boulevard Project, to reduce transportation -related GHG emissions. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Traffic Engineer); 67. Pursue LEED Certification. Future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site shall seek LEED Gold certification or equivalent for development per the recommendations of the City's Green Building Ordinance. The Project Sponsor shall submit draft LEED (or equivalent) checklists to the City Sustainability Coordinator for review and consultation. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 68. Placement or Screeninq of HVAC Mechanical Equipment. All HVAC mechanical equipment shall be located more than 60 feet from the nearest property line. Alternatively, HVAC mechanical equipment may be installed in a noise enclosure sufficient to reduce ground -level noise levels at the nearest property boundary to 70 dBA CNEL or less. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 69. Provide Flood Protection ua to the 100-Year Flood Event alus Sea Level Rise for Underaround Structures. To protect underground structures from sea level rise flood risks, prior to approving grading and/or building permits the City shall ensure that the project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements into all applicable -project features using a flood elevation of at least 7.1 feet. All below -ground structures, including storm drains, sewers, equipment facilities, and others, shall be flood proofed and designed to withstand hydrostatic forces and buoyancy from water surface elevations up to 7.1 feet in elevation. Certain portions of the shoreline open space may not be protected at the ultimate level of flooding, given proposed heights. However, developed areas of the Project would be protected. For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be developed to address end -of -century conditions. (Hydrology, Building Division and Public Works Department); 70. Provide Adeauate Storm Flow Convevance Caaacity for Sea Level Rise Conditions. To ensure that the storm drain system conveyance capacity is not constricted by sea level rise at the outlets, the Project Sponsor shall design the storm drain system to adequately convey stormwater runoff at outlet water surface elevations equivalent to the 100-year flood event base elevation plus sea level rise of 55 inches (water surface elevation of 11.6 feet at the outlet). Prior to receiving a grading permit, the City shall review project designs and studies for adequacy of storm flow conveyance with an outlet surface water elevation of 11.6 feet and in accordance with City design standards. The City shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. The Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City Conditions of Approval into project designs, prior to receiving a grading permit (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 71. Provide Protection of Shoreline and Flood Protection Features from Hvdrodvnamic Forces from Sea Level Rise Conditions. Prior to receiving a grading permit, in order to ensure that the shoreline and flood protection features associated with the proposed project provide protection under sea level rise hydrodynamic andlor hydrostatic conditions, the Project Sponsor shall prepare engineering studies to identify expected hydrodynamic forces for under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet and hydrostatic forces from a 24 911RL Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be implemented to address end -of -century conditions. The Project Sponsor shall design shoreline and flood protection features that could accommodate hydrodynamic forces from sea level rise conditions along wherever flood protection features are identified under Mitigation Measure HY-7.1 and at shoreline protection features for stability and integrity under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The Project Sponsor shall also design flood protection features for protection against hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). The City shall review designs and associated studies for conformance with City requirements and adequacy of design measures to withstand hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces associated with the design criteria. The Project Sponsor shall also design erosion protection along the shoreline set -back area for protection under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The City shall review designs and associated studies for adequacy in protecting the shoreline set -back area under these conditions. The City Public Works Department shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. Prior to receiving a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City and BCDC Conditions of Approval into project designs. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 72. Provide Flood Protection up to the 100-Year Flood Event plus Sea Level Rise for Above -Ground Structures. To protect structures and people from sea level rise risks at the 350 Airport Boulevard Site, prior to approving grading permits, the City shall ensure project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements for a flood depth of the identified 100-year flood hazard water surface elevation plus a 4.6-foot (55-inch) rise in sea level. At a minimum, the Project Site shall be graded to over 10 feet above msl and the finished floor elevation of all building finished floors shall be constructed to 14.5 feet (i.e., 2.9 feet above the 11.6-foot potential flood elevation), or as otherwise determined as grading plans are developed. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); and 73. Future Wind Tunnel Analysis. To reduce potential impacts associated with future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site, a wind tunnel analysis shall be conducted in order to ensure that future development of the Site is designed in a way to minimize wind shadow effects at surrounding windsurfing areas. (Wind and Recreation, Planning Division). Prepared by: Kevin Gardiner, Planning Manager c. Genzon Investment Group, applicant Burlingame Point LLC, property owner 25 g R Community Development Department PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT ("BURLINGAME POINT") Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 ACTION ITEM Item No: 8(d) Attachments: • Applicant Letter of Explanation, dated October 5, 2017 • Application to the Planning Commission • Proposed Resolution • Notice of Public Hearing - Mailed October 13, 2017 26 Gensler RECEIVED OC'T -5 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. October 5, 2017 Kevin Gardiner and Planning Commissioners City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Burlingame Point Project Dear Kevin Gardiner and Planning Commissioners: The Burlingame Point Project was approved by the Planning Commission on August 22, 2016. Since then, construction documents were completed and submitted for permit on May 12, 2017. Since the August 22, 2016 Planning Commission approval, the Owner elected to remove the private tenant terraces on Buildings 3 and 4. The permit comments referred to these private tenant terraces as roof decks. It should be noted that the private tenant terraces were envisioned and presented at the August 22 Planning Commission hearing as well as at previous study sessions, not as public space but as private tenant amenities. The revised plan of the mechanical screen for Building 3 and Building 4 is shown in the attached drawings. As can be seen in the provided elevations, the plan change did not impact the height of the mechanical screen and there is no impact to the fa4ade. Best regards, Benedict Tranel, AIA, LEED AP Principal a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: 19, Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: PROJECT ADDRESS:___ APPLICANT _ PROPERTY! OWNER n Name: - a ' Vy��/ l at^ Name: - l� Ur��. e F' o I'r1# L Address: `T ��j �7(�or� �7��oi, Jaiu {; Address: Airf ocf /y�i SL(AAe. City/State/Zip: r� �+'�a„v,e , CA , % � City/State/Zip: �' il,>'�%� C- � ! � L � , C c Phone: `t'r<� (� I j C� Phone: /T 15 — 6(li / I E-mail: +il C41 Xx �e�41 7.,0 . 60e" . C4� E-mail: - Czpi Xk C ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Address: Z ✓i 5o, Seet ` e �i o RECEIVED City/State/Zip: S ar, FV'ao G 5Q, OCT - 5 2017 Phone: 4/5 — R 7 G— 4 q- 5? CITY OF BURLINGAME E-mail: r , ? J e4 e d I CA — l ro 0 el 0,3eri S jet' CDD-PLANNING DIV. Burlingame Business License # Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of Architect/Designer) e' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: _>-ze ate' rr.e4,_t AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: `� T I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature:�?�— L�1 Date: /o/ �— � 2_> I Date submitted: S: �HANDOUTSjPC Applicotion. doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OFFICE/LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS AT 300 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE ANZA POINT NORTH (APN) ZONE RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT: WHEREAS, an application for Commercial Design Review for Amendments to the Bayfront Specific Plan, amendments to the zoning code related to the Anza Point North and Parking Regulations, amendment to the sign code, rezoning of a portion of the site from the APS zone district to the APN zone district, tentative parcel map, development agreement, Conditional Use Permit for Day Care Use and Commercial Design Review for construction of 767,000 square feet of new uses including office space or life science uses, retail uses, food services, a childcare facility and an exercise facility at 300 Airport Boulevard, zoned APN and APS, was approved by the Burlingame City Council on June 18, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the application was certified by the Burlingame City Council on June 18, 2012; and WHEREAS, an application for Commercial Design Review Amendment and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum of the previously approved Office/Life Science Campus was approved by the Burlingame Planning Commission on August 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, an application has been made for Commercial Design Review Amendment of the previously approved Office/Life Science Campus at 300 Airport Boulevard, zoned APN, Burlingame Point LLC, property owner, APN: 026-350-130; and WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 23, 2017, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THIS PLANNING COMMISSION THAT: Section 1. On the basis of the Environmental Impact Report, Environmental Impact Report Addendum, the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that interior or exterior alterations to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, is hereby approved.. Section 2. Said Commercial Design Review Amendment is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Commercial Design Review are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. Section 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. RESOLUTION NO. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 231d day of October, 2017 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped July 29, 2016, Sheets: COVER SHEET; 1 GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION; 2 SITE PLAN; 3 B1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN; 4 LANDSCAPE SITE SECTIONS - EAST CAMPUS; 5 LANDSCAPE SITE SECTIONS - WEST CAMPUS; 6 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 7 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 8 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 01; 9 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 10 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 11 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 02; 12 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 13 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 14 L5 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 15 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 03; 16 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 17 L3 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 18 L5 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 19 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - BUILDING 04; 20 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 01; 21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 01; 22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 02; 23 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 02; 24 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 25 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 26 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 27 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 03; 28 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 29 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 30 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 31 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 04; 32 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 01 & 02; 33 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 03; 34 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 03; 35 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 04; 36 BUILDING SECTIONS - BUILDING 04; 37 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN — GARAGE; 38 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 05 GARAGE; 39 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 05 GARAGE; 40 BUILDING SECTION — GARAGE; 41 L1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 42 L2 CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 43 ROOF CONSTRUCTION PLAN - AMENITY BUILDING; 44 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - AMENITY BUILDING; 45 OVERALL GRADING PLAN; 46 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN; with amendments to Buildings 3 and 4 as indicated on plans submitted to the Planning Division and date stamped October 5, 2017. 2. that prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall return to the Planning Commission with the following FYIs: a. a complete landscape plan indicating size, species, quantities and locations of all plantings; and b. analysis of compliance with Complete Streets provisions; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 5. that the project shall include installation and maintenance of the Bay Trail and Sanchez Channel improvements as shown in the submitted plans and shall obtain approval from the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) for the work within BCDC jurisdiction; 6. that the project shall include approximately 6,655 square feet of retail use and 19,750 square feet of food service use that may be located in buildings B1, B2 and the amenities building, and Developer shall use its best commercial efforts to lease this space for retail or food service, including recreation - related uses such as bike rentals, and interactive educational space, as the case may be, for two years following issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for each building. Thereafter, any change to the use of the space designated for retail, recreation -related or food service use shall be reviewed EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 and approved by the Planning Commission using the process set out in Municipal Code Sections 25.16.040 through 25.16.085, using the conditional use permit findings as the standard of review; 7. that the following items agreed to by the applicant shall be included as a part of the project: a. Drinking fountains shall be provided as a part of the Bay Trail improvements, and shall include ground -level spouts for dogs. b. The educational nodes provided within the Bay Trail improvements shall include interactive features such as binocular/telescope stands and pictographic educational elements regarding local flora, fauna, marine and wind phenomena. c. The Sanchez Channel open space shall include an area for active use (e.g. frisbee or catch); 8. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's February 7, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. an application for a building permit for this project received after December 31, 2013 must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes and adopted City of Burlingame Ordinances unless specific land use provisions for the project were approved by the City of Burlingame prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013. If the Planning Commission has approved the project then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2010 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856 2010. This project must comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance in effect at the time of building permit applications. 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Codes (CBC) which will be employed by the City of Burlingame beginning January 1, 2011. 2) Comply with the City of Burlingame Green Building Ordinance in effect at the time of Planning Commission approval for this project. 3) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 4) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 5) Indicate on the plans that ail work shall be conducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See City of Burlingame Ordinance Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. 6) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards or standards in effect at the time of building permit application. Note: All projects for which a building permit application is received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://wvvw.enerov.ca.gov/fitle24/2008standards/ for publications and details. 7) Indicate on the plans that all roofing systems will comply with Cool Roof requirements of the 2008 California Energy Code. 2008 CEC §151 (f) 12. The 2008 Residential and Non -Residential Compliance Manuals are available on line at http://www.enerciv.camovititle24/2008standardst. 8) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines. 9) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 10) Obtain a survey of the property lines. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 11) Indicate on the plans that, at the time of Building Permit application, plans and engineering will be submitted for shoring as required by 2010 CRC, or applicable Building Code, regarding the protection of adjacent property and as required by OSHA. On the plans, indicate that the following will be addressed: a. The walls of the proposed basement shall be properly shored, prior to construction activity. This excavation may need temporary shoring. A competent contractor shall be consulted for recommendations and design of shoring scheme for the excavation. The recommended design type of shoring shall be approved by the engineer of record or soils engineer prior to usage. All appropriate guidelines of OSHA shall be incorporated into the shoring design by the contractor. Where space permits, temporary construction slopes may be utilized in lieu of shoring. Maximum allowable vertical cut for the subject project will be five (5) feet. Beyond that horizontal benches of 5 feet wide will be required. Temporary shores shall not exceed 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). In some areas due to high moisture content / water table, flatter slopes will be required which will be recommended by the soils engineer in the field. C. If shoring is required, specify on the plans whose sole responsibility it is to design and provide adequate shoring, bracing, formwork, etc. as required for the protection of life and property during construction of the building. d. Shoring and bracing shall remain in place until floors, roof, and wall sheathing have been entirely constructed. e. Shoring plans shall be wet -stamped and signed by the engineer -of -record and submitted to the city for review prior to construction. If applicable, include surcharge loads from adjacent structures that are within the zone of influence (45 degree wedge up the slope from the base of the retaining wall) and / or driveway surcharge loads. 12) Indicate on the plans that an OSHA permit will be obtained for the shoring* at the excavation in the basement per CAL / OSHA requirements. See the Cal / OSHA handbook at: http://www.ca-osha.com/pdfpubs/osha userguide.pdf. *Construction Safety Orders : Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Article 6 , Section 1541.1. 13) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 14) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 15) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 16) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 17) Prior to applying for a Building Permit the applicant must obtain an address for each structure on the site, acceptable to the Fire Marshal, from the Engineering Department. Note: The correct address must be referenced on all pages of the plans. 18) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building Type of construction C. Allowable area EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 d. Proposed area e. Allowable height f. Proposed height g. Proposed fire separation distances h. Exterior wall and opening protection i. Allowable ii. Proposed i. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered 19) Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2010 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 4, Table 4-1 Minimum Plumbing Facilities and Table A - Occupant Load Factor. 20) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2010 CBC for commercial buildings including: a. Accessible paths of travel b. A level landing must be provided on each side of the door at all required entrances and exits. C. Accessible countertops d. Accessible bathrooms e. Accessible parking 21) Per CEO 3003.5, all structures four or more stories in height must have at least one elevator that can accommodate a stretcher. See the referenced code section for dimensions (80" x 54") and other details. 22) Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 23) In Assembly occupancies specify aisle widths that comply with Section 1025.9. 24) Specify the total number of parking spaces on site 25) All NEW non-residential buildings must comply with the requirements of AB-2176 Sec. 42911 (c) [2003 — 2004 Montanez) as follows: a. Space for recycling must be a part of the project design in new buildings. b. A building permit will not be issued unless details are shown on the project plans incorporating adequate storage for collecting and loading recycled materials. 26) Include with your Building Division plan check submittal a complete underground fire sprinkler plan. Contact the Burlingame Water Division at 650-558-7660 for details regarding the water system or Central County Fire for sprinkler details. 27) Sewer connection fees must be paid prior to issuing the building permit. 9. that the conditions of the NPDES Coordinators February 8, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 a. The project will need to comply with additional and new Low Impact Development (LID) requirements under the Municipal Regional Permit, C.3 Provisions, which became effective on December 11, 2011. For details and technical guidance on these C.3 requirements visit the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) at http://www/flowstobay.orianas new development.php. b. The following C.3 forms/worksheets have been updated and project proponents will need to use and submit these forms as part of the final construction documents and associated building permits: 1) NPDES Permit Impervious Surface Data Collection Worksheet* 2) C.3 and C.6 Development Review Checklist*. *both forms are available for download at http://www/flowstobay.orcebs new development.pho. c. When submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction stormwater pollution prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) as project notes and include them as a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project proponents may use the attached Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) plan sheet to comply with this requirement. Electronic file is available for download at http://www/flowstobay.orq/bs construction. ph (scroll about half -way down the page and click on Construction BMP Plan Sheet). 10. that the conditions of the Parks Supervisor's February 6, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. Submit a Landscape Project Application to the Parks Division in compliance with the Water Conservation in Landscape Ordinance. b. New trees in the Airport Boulevard islands shall be Platanus acerfolia 'Columbia'. 11. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. All buildings shall be equipped with fire alarms, fire sprinklers and standpipes where required by the California Fire Code and the Burlingame Municipal Code. b. Fire Flow and Fire Hydrants shall conform to Appendix B and C of the International Fire Code 2006 Edition. c. Fire apparatus access shall be provided for all buildings in accordance with §503 of the International Fire Code. d. Fire Control Room as required by the California Building Code shall be placed to the exterior of the building with exterior access. Rooms shall be positioned facing fir apparatus access. This requirement may negate exterior remote annunciators and key boxes intended to house HMIS/HMMP as required for Burlingame Municipal Code. e. Please see Burlingame Municipal Code specific to Addressing Requirements and Key Boxes associated with Hazardous Materials. f. The fire department shall request HMIS/HMIP in accordance with the California Fire Code. All inventory lists shall at minimum indicate the hazardous material class and quantities consistent with Table 2703.1.1(1), Title 24 CFC classes and units (i.e.: pounds, gallons, cubic feet at NTP, etc.). g. Space shall be provided within each Highrise for installation of a repeater/receiver antenna and supporting equipment for City Communications. An electrical supply source shall be EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 provided at the antenna/equipment location. Reasonable access shall be provided to City staff contractors for installation of necessary telephone lines and for purposes of installation, maintenance, adjustment and repair of the antenna/equipment. 12. that the conditions of the Public Works Department, Engineering Division's May 8, 2012 memo shall be met, which includes the following comments: a. With City approval, the Developer proposes to construct a new, realigned Airport Boulevard through the Project and to construct Bay Trail and Bay frontage improvements in the City's right-of-way easement of the original Airport Boulevard. Developer understands that the underlying fee of the original Airport Boulevard ROW, from the existing Sanchez Chanel Bridge East to Fisherman's Park and South from Fisherman's Park to Beach Road, is owned by the State of California, State Lands Commission and that the City only holds a ROW easement over same. Developer shall give the State Lands Commission written notice of its development plans and specifically, notice of the proposed improvements to be constructed in the ROW of the original Airport Boulevard alignment, within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's recommendation of the Project to the City Council. At any time, should State Lands have any concerns over said improvements, object to any aspect of the proposed improvements or initiate any type of administrative or judicial action in regard to these proposed improvements, Developer shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all fees (including attorneys' fees), damages, fines or any other costs of any kind related to such objections, claims or actions. Additionally, the Developer shall obtain letters of no objection to the proposed realignment of Airport Boulevard from all utility companies. The Project Developer shall relocate all existing utilities from within the existing Airport Boulevard roadway to the proposed realigned Airport Boulevard roadway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and affected utility companies. b. The developer shall prepare necessary engineering drawings and construction documents to construct the Sanchez Channel Bridge widening as identified in the existing BCDC permit to provide the necessary width for pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular access along Airport Boulevard. The developer shall complete construction of these improvements at his/her expense These drawings shall be approved by the City Engineer as part of the Building Permit process. c. The developer shall be responsible to meet all San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) requirements for the project and provide the City with documentation of all approvals by BCDC for all work within 100 feet of the shoreline band along the San Francisco Bay and Sanchez drainage channel. d. The developer shall enter into a Site Maintenance Agreement with the City for maintenance of all landscape, sidewalk, medians, and stormwater improvements as well as roadway improvements that do not conform to city standards, such as the proposed roadway intersections. The Site Maintenance Agreement shall be executed prior to the issuance of the Building permit. e. All traffic improvements, including but not limited to traffic signals, pedestrian countdown signals, pedestrian audible signals, signal interconnection hardware, street lights, signage, street markings, etc., shall be approved by the City Engineer and installed at the property owner's expense. The proposed streetlights must conform to current standards which require Beta LED's or equivalent. The developer shall submit and obtain approval of the required engineering drawings and specifications for all public improvements as part of the building permit process. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 f. The project shall reimburse to the City the operation, maintenance and energy costs of the proposed traffic signals. The City will maintain the newly proposed traffic signal operations. The operation cost of the traffic signal will be adjusted annually by the City based on prevailing costs. The electricity costs will be based on direct billing by PG & E. g. The developer shall provide at his/her expense shoreline access, adequate erosion protection and site amenities to the standards established by the City and BCDC. h. The Bay and drainage channel shorelines located on this property will require stabilization improvements to provide flood protection for the public access trail and bridge. All shoreline and drainage channel slope protection measures, need to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The public and facility users shall be safely provided for and protected from the flooding of the site in the event of a disaster. This includes a storm or an earthquake which coincides with a maximum high tide and possible breaching of Sanchez Channel and/or Airport Boulevard levees. The property owner shall employ a qualified engineer to analyze the seismic stability of the Sanchez Channel and Airport Boulevard levees and identify protection against possible earthquake or storm event. The property owner shall submit the structural and seismic stability analysis to the City Engineer for review and approval. If the analysis indicates that improvements are necessary along the project site to provide stability for an event, such improvements shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first building. j. The developer shall be required to incorporate the following measures into project design in order to reduce the potential impacts of flooding: 1) Necessary tide gates shall be installed in the storm drain system on the project site to prevent high water from back flowing into the site during flood periods; 2) Adequate drainage and pump facilities, including a sound -baffled backup power supply, shall be provided in the parking area to prevent water ponding in excess of ten (10) inches in the event of a 100-year flood; 3) Storm drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate any future settlement of the site, levees and other fill along the site perimeter; 4) A flood contingency plan shall be developed to provide guidelines for management of vehicles in the event of flooding of the parking area; and 5) On -site improvements shall be designed to provide 100-year flood protection. All emergency equipment, generators, controls, and motors shall be located above the 100- year flood elevation. k. The developer shall install a six-inch diameter recycled water main with the roadway improvements. This six-inch line shall extend from the existing Sanchez Channel Bridge east to the other end of the new roadway alignment near Beach Road. Initially the line shall be connected to the City water main and serve as the service connection for irrigation. This line and the irrigation system shall convert to a recycled water line once it becomes available. These improvements shall be done at the property owner's cost and shall be completed in concurrence with the roadway improvements. I. The project developer shall implement and maintain an appropriate Transportation Demand Management measures in accordance with the San Mateo County Congestion Plan to reduce the number of trips generated by this project. m. Detailed grading and drainage plans shall be submitted by the project developer for review by the City Engineer at the time of applying for a building permit. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 n. The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution during and after the construction. In addition, the project developer shall provide all documentation relating to compliance with the Regional Municipal Permit from the State of California Water Resources Board. o. It is possible that this project may require approvals and permits from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Department of Fish and Game, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The applicant must provide written records of contacting the above agencies demonstrating that a permit has been obtained or is not required. p. All street improvements plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval These improvements include but are not limited to sanitary sewer mains and laterals; water mains and services; storm drain mains and inlets; street structural sections, soils report, etc. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations are required for all designs associated with the new road alignment. The road structural section shall be designed to a traffic index of minimum 12.0 and shall withstand vertical displacement due to natural subsurface settlement. The structural section shall be designed for a 20-year life based on recommendations of a professional geotechnical engineer and accompanying soils report. q. The project developer shall perform necessary engineering studies to determine the required capacity and improvements to the system to be approved by the City Engineer. At the City's discretion, the sanitary sewer improvements shall be routed along Airport Boulevard to an existing pump station, thence along Airport Boulevard to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The sanitary sewer system improvements shall be designed and constructed to accommodate the fully built -out conditions of the project and adjacent properties. r. The project shall abandon the existing potable water main located within existing alignment of Airport Boulevard from Fisherman's Park to Beach Road. The project shall evaluate the existing condition of the water main. If necessary and at the City's discretion, the project shall design and construct a new potable water main system along the newly proposed Airport Boulevard from Beach Road to the Sanchez Channel as well as the replace the existing potable water main segment from Sanchez Channel to Fisherman's Park. s. The project shall install purple piping in buildings for future reclaimed water use in building applications. 13. that early demolition, mass excavation, grading, shoring and foundation permits, including permits for installation of indicator/production piles, may be issued in advance of a building permit provided that prior to issuance of such permits, the applicant has submitted construction plans for the project to the Building Division, or has provided evidence that it is having such plans prepared for the project for which the demolition or grading work is intended. Further, building construction permits shall be submitted and received in accordance with the progress of the work which will occur in phases. Permits that may be submitted individually for application may include, but are not limited to, indicator/production piles, mass excavation, shoring, grading, foundations, superstructure, architecture MEP, fire protection, fire alarm, curtain wall, and so forth, subject to the consent of the City's Building Official and the Fire Marshal. Building Permit phasing and scheduling shall be arranged with the Project Applicant and the Community Development Department — Building Division, such that the work can proceed in an orderly fashion as one continuous phase of construction; 14. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 15. Exterior lighting for the project would be designed to meet the requirements of Burlingame Municipal Code Section 18.16.030 (pertaining to light spillage off site in commercial or residential areas), the California Energy Commission, and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America for illumination levels. Compliance with these performance standards would minimize the dispersion of light in a manner that reduces the glow or aurora effect to acceptable and allowable levels. In addition, the project area already contains numerous sources of exterior lighting, and is not adjacent to uses that would be sensitive to light spillover. 16. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 17. that the overall height of the buildings as measured from the top of curb at Airport Boulevard (+ 14.5' elevation) to the top of the mechanical screens shall be no taller than the following heights: Buildings B1 and B2, 97.0', Building 83, 129.0', Building B4, 144.0', Parking Structure, 67.5', and Amenities Building, 49.0'; building heights shall be surveyed at the framing of each floor and at the installation of the mechanical screen and shall be reported to the Building Division as each floor is framed and accepted by the City Engineer before framing of the subsequent floor or roof commences. The elevator overruns and associated structures shall be permitted to exceed the stated height limits to the degree that such exceedance is necessitated by the Uniform Building Code in order for elevators to serve their intended purpose of providing access by persons to the rooftop terraces on the buildings. The entire building height of each structure shall be surveyed to confirm conformance with the approved plans and conditions of approval before scheduling the final framing inspection. If the building does not conform at any point in the construction process, it shall be made to conform before construction continues and any further city inspections shall be scheduled (Building Division); 18. that the applicant shall pay the required Bayfront Development Fee based on the square footage of the buildings and the current rate adjusted for inflation, the total fee due is calculated to be $1,695,070.00. Per the development agreement, one-half of the fee is due at the time of issuance of the first City Building Permit for construction of a building, and one-half is due before the final framing inspection is scheduled, for each Development Phase. The fee due shall be offset by the actual costs incurred by Developer in designing, preparing, installing and constructing (a) the realignment and widening of Airport Boulevard but limited to the customary and ordinary costs for such improvements without special pedestrian treatments, and (b) the Sanchez Channel bridge widening as outlined in the Development Agreement (Planning Division); 19. that the applicant shall pay the required public facilities impact fees based on the square footage of the buildings, and that the Parks and Recreation fee ($131,924.00) and the Storm Drain Fee ($549,939.00) shall be waived, the total remaining fee due shall be $1,102,179.00. The remaining fees shall be payable by development phase, and shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of the first building permit for construction of each building as follows: Building 61: $209,802.00, Building 62: $209,802.00, Building B3: $293,722.80, Building B4, $335,683.20, and Amenities Center: $53,169.00 (Planning Division): 20. that the property owner shall be responsible to see that small delivery trucks or vans making periodic deliveries are on -site only during office hours; no trucks, recreation vehicles or other vehicles shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight, and no parking shall be leased to tenants or any other users for any purpose, 21. that the property owner shall comply with the Transportation Demand Management Program prepared by Fehr and Peers for 350 Beach Road, LLC dated April 6, 2011 including the following measures: EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 a. Secure Bicycle Storage: Secure, indoor bicycle storage for at least 26 bicycles shall be provided in a lobby or garage level room within each of the four office buildings. In addition, bicycle racks for up to 50 bicycles will be located outside of Buildings #1 or #4. b. Showers and Changing Rooms: Shower facilities with changing rooms shall be provided throughout the site, with access available to all employees. Shower facilities (two men's and two women's) and changing rooms (one men's and one women's) shall be provided in each of the four office buildings, the amenities center shall include 12 showers and two changing rooms. c. Shuttle Service: Coordinate with the Peninsula Commuter Alliance to add two stops within the project site to the existing commuter shuttle from the Millbrae Intermodal Station. The shuttle provides 10-minute headways during peak periods. d. Carpool Parking: Provide 15 preferential parking spaces for carpools at each of the four office buildings. e. Vanpool Parking: Provide two preferential parking spaces for vanpools at each of the four office buildings. f. Commute Assistance Center: 1) Provide an on -site one -stop shopping for transit and commute alternatives information. 2) Provide a part-time on -site TDM coordinator available to assist building tenants with trip planning. g. Employees' Surveys: The TDM coordinator shall develop and administer two surveys per year to examine TDM program participation and best practices. h. Video Conferencing Center: One video conferencing center of approximately 8500 sf shall be installed for use by the tenants of the facility. i. On -Site Amenities/Accommodations: On -site amenities, including banking, retail, delivery dry cleaning, exercise facilities, child care center, delivery pharmacy and food service shall be provided at the project site to encourage people to stay on site during the work day; j. On -Site Bicycles for Employee Use- Bicycles shall be provided at each office building. Employees will have access to bicycles during breaks for personal or business use. k. Child Care Services: Child care center service shall be provided on site; I. Guaranteed Ride Home Program: Employees will have access to the Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program administered by the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance (Alliance) for emergencies. The program provides vouchers for taxicabs or rental cars for this purpose. m. Transportation Action Plan: The TDM coordinator shall work with the Alliance to create a Transportation Action Plan for each tenant. n. Transportation Management Association: If the office park has multiple tenants, each tenant shall provide a representative to form a Transportation Management Association and be a liaison to the TDM Coordinator. o. Coordination of Transportation Demand Management Programs: The TDM coordinator shall coordinate with other TDM programs with existing developments/employers in the surrounding area. p. Subsidy for Transit Tickets: Employers shall offer subsidies to employees to compensate them for the cost of transit tickets. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 q. Electric Vehicle Stations: The applicant shall provide plug-in stations for electric vehicles. r. House Car for Employee Use: Each building will provide employees with access to a "house car" for use during the day. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 22. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 23. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 24. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Mitigation Measures from Environmental Impact Report: Measures Applicable to 300 Airport Boulevard Project as well as future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard site: 25. Amphlett Poplar Intersection: The City of San Mateo is considering a range of potential improvements at the Amphlett Boulevard/Poplar Avenue intersection to provide sufficient capacity for existing and future traffic volume. However, a specific improvement project has not been identified at this time. The Project Sponsor, and any future project sponsor for development of the 350 Airport Boulevard site, shall negotiate an agreement with the City of San Mateo to make a fair share contribution toward the cost of improvements at this intersection for each projects respective impacts (Transportation, Planning, Public Works, City of San Mateo); 26. Implement Recommended Dust Control Measures. To reduce particulate matter emissions during Project excavation and construction phases, the Project contractor(s) shall comply with the dust control strategies developed by BAAQMD. The Project Sponsor shall include in all construction contracts the following requirements or measures: • All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. • All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. • Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. (Air Quality; (Planning and Building Divisions); 27. Construction Equipment Emissions Minimization. To reduce the potential impacts resulting from Project construction activities, the Project Sponsor shall include in contract specifications a requirement for the following measures: Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to two minutes; The Project shall develop a construction plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment (more than 50 horsepower) to be used in the construction Project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles) would achieve a Project wide fleet -average 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent PM reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average (as specified in California Code of Regulations Article 4.8, Section 2449 General Requirements for In -Use Off - Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets). Acceptable options for reducing emissions include the use of late model engines, low -emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after - treatment products, add -on devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such become available; All construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators shall be equipped with Best Available Control Technology for emission reductions of NOx and PM; • Use of Interim Tier 4, if applicable, or equivalent equipment for all uses where such equipment is available; • Use of Tier 3 equipment with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) or alternative fuel vehicles for applications where Tier 4 Interim engines are not available; • Prohibition of diesel generators for construction purposes where feasible alternative sources of power are available; • All construction equipment shall be maintained in proper working condition in accordance with manufacturer's specifications; • Diesel -powered construction equipment shall comply with BAAQMD requirements or meet Tier 3 or Tier 4 EPA/CARB standards; and • To the extent feasible, the existing electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction sites shall be used rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines. (Air Quality; Planning and Building Divisions) 28. Application of Low-VOC Coatings. The Project Sponsor shall use low VOC (i.e., ROG) coatings beyond the local requirements as per the BAAQMD Guideline (i.e., Regulation a Rule 3: Architectural Coatings) (Air Quality, Planning and Building Divisions); EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 29. Implement Best Management Practices to Reduce Construction Noise. The following BMPs shall be incorporated into the construction documents to be implemented by the Project contractor. a. Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: i. Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; ii. Use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound bafflers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; iii. Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and iv. Minimize backing movements of equipment. b. Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible. c. Impact equipment (e.g., jack hammers and pavement breakers) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically -powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible. d. Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. e. Select routes for movement of construction -related vehicles and equipment in conjunction with the Burlingame Planning Division so that noise -sensitive areas, including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible. f. The project sponsor shall designate a "disturbance coordinator for construction activities. The coordinator would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration. The coordinator would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 30. Notify Nearby Businesses of Construction Activities that Could Affect Vibration -Sensitive Equipment. The Project Sponsor shall provide notification to adjacent property owners and occupants, prior to the start of construction, informing them of the estimated start date and duration of vibration - generating construction activities during site preparation, grading, and pile driving, if required. This notification shall include information warning about the potential for impacts related to vibration - sensitive equipment. The Project Sponsor shall identify a phone number for the property owners and occupants to call if they have vibration -sensitive equipment on their site. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 31. Implement Construction BMPs to Reduce Construction Vibration. The Project Sponsor shall implement the following measures during construction of all Project components: • To the extent feasible, construction activities that could generate high vibration levels at any identified vibration -sensitive locations shall be scheduled during times that would have the least impact on nearby land uses. This could include restricting construction activities in the areas of potential impact to the early and late hours of the work day, such as from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 am. or 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday. • Stationary sources, such as construction staging areas and temporary generators, shall be located as far from nearby vibration -sensitive receptors as possible. • Trucks shall be prohibited from idling along streets serving the construction site where vibration - sensitive equipment is located. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 Avoid pile driving when possible within 100 feet of an existing structure. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 32. Implement Alternative Pile Driving Methods. The Project Sponsor shall use alternative pile driving methods (e.g., drilled or steel piles) for piles driven in proximity to existing vibration receptors such that vibration levels at vibration -sensitive equipment shall not exceed 65 VdB. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); 33. Bird Nest Pre -Construction Survey. The Project Sponsor(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction breeding -season surveys (approximately March 15 through August 30) of the Project Site and immediate vicinity during the same calendar year that construction is planned to begin, in consultation with the CDFG as discussed below. If phased construction procedures are planned for the Project, the results of the above survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. A report shall be submitted to CDFG, following the completion of the bird nesting survey that includes, at a minimum, the following information: • A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted. A map showing the location(s) of any bird nests observed on the Project Site. If the above survey does not identify any nesting bird species on the Project Site, no further mitigation would be required. However, should any active bird nests be located on the Project Site, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. (Biological Resources, Planning Division); 34. Bird Nest Buffer Zone. The Project Sponsor(s), in consultation with CDFG, shall delay construction in the vicinity of active bird nest sites located on or adjacent to the Project Site during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. If active nests are identified, construction activities should not occur within 500 ft of the nest. A qualified biologist shall monitor the active nest until the young have fledged, until the biologist determines that the nest is no longer active, or if it is reasonable that construction activities are not disturbing nesting behaviors. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 35. In order to reduce significant impacts to the City's wastewater conveyance and treatment system associated with the Proiect, the Project Sponsor shall adhere to either of the two following mitigation measures.. a. Upgrade Pump Capacity at the Existing 399 Rollins Road Pump Station and Reduce Inflow and Infiltration within the Wastewater System. The Project Sponsor(s) shall contribute fair -share funds toward the upgrade of the 399 RRPS capacity, or equivalent project to increase capacity in the system, to accommodate the increased PWWF that would result from implementation of the Project. Additionally, the Project Sponsor(s) shall rehabilitate the existing wastewater system, where necessary, to reduce inflow and infiltration that contributes to PWWFs at the WWTP in an amount concomitant with increases in flows contributed by the 300 Airport Boulevard Project. b. Upgrade to the Existing Airport Boulevard Conveyance System Variant to Rollins Road Pump Station Upgrade. The Project Sponsor(s) shall coordinate with the City of Burlingame Public Works Department to upgrade the capacity of the City's wastewater conveyance and treatment system to accommodate the increased PWWF that would result from implementation of development of the 300 and 350 Airport Boulevard Sites. Such measures could include, as necessary, installation of a new pump station within public right of way or EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 other area near the Sanchez Channel Bridge on the Project Site, upgrade the capacity of the existing Airport Boulevard Pump Station, extension of wastewater lines across Sanchez Channel, via attachment to the Sanchez Channel Bridge, to tie into existing wastewater lines under Airport Boulevard west of the Project Site, and increasing, as required, the capacity of existing gravity lines between the Project. Site and the Airport Boulevard Pump Station and existing force main between the Airport Boulevard Pump Station and the WWrp. The Project Sponsor shall construct the necessary improvements to serve the Project Site and additional properties along Airport Boulevard that would connect to this sewer line. (Utilities, Public Works Department); 36. Undiscovered Cultural Resources. If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guideline Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden'), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction -related earth -moving activities, all ground -disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame shall be notified. The Project Sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The City of Burlingame shall consult with the archeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less -than - significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. 37. Unique Paleontological/Geological Features. Should a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature be identified at the project construction site during any phase of construction, the Project manager shall cease all construction activities at the site of the discovery and immediately notify the City of Burlingame. The Project Sponsor shall retain a qualified paleontologist to provide an evaluation of the find and to prescribe mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less - than -significant level. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources or geologic features is carried out. The Project Sponsor shall be responsible for implementing any additional mitigation measures prescribed by the paleontologist and approved by the City. 38. Human Remains. If human remains are discovered at any Project construction site during any phase of construction, all ground -disturbing activity 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Burlingame and the San Mateo County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The Project Sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City of Burlingame shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project applicant shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City of Burlingame, before the resumption of ground -disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 gilia[H_111[0J,71, I�1il-11l:7��,1]»[o1_�13���]►�1�'iC�j�a 39. Reduce Risk of Exposure During Construction. If the childcare center is operational during the construction of Phase 2 of the Project, one of the following shall be implemented: a. A Health Risk Assessment is conducted prior to commencement of construction of Phase II that demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the BAAQMD, that impacts to the children at the childcare center are less than significant during Phase 11 construction or specific sub phases of Phase 11 construction; or b. Implement the following building design and operational restrictions. 1. The childcare center building shall be designed such that the air intake would be located at the far eastern edge of the building with the air intake facing east. 2. A MERV 15 or higher rated filter shall be installed and operated for at least the duration of construction activities. The MERV 15 or higher rated filters have the potential to remove up to 85 percent of particles of 2.5 microns or greater thereby reducing interior levels of pollutants. 3. All outdoor activities at the childcare center shall be suspended while construction activities are occurring. If implementation of this Mitigation Measure is infeasible, then the childcare center would be prohibited from operating during Phase 11 construction. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 40. Maintenance and Testing of Generators. As part of the conditions of operation for the onsite back-up generators, all diesel emissions associated with the maintenance and testing of the generators should be conducted at such times as the daycare center is not in operation, particularly nights and weekends. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 41. Implementation of MERV 15 Filters. The Project Sponsor shall consider implementing MERV 15 or higher rated filters for the amenities building. This would further reduce exposure of daycare students to emissions from US 101. The MERV 15 or higher rated filters have the potential to remove up to 85 percent of PM2.5 and would reduce risk while students were inside the building. (Air Quality, Building and Planning Divisions); 42. Incorporate GHG Reduction Measures for Maintenance Activities. The Project Sponsor shall provide infrastructure for the use of electric landscape equipment during landscaping activities, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 43. Incorporate Trees and Vegetation into Proiect Design. Trees and other shade structures shall be incorporated into the Site Plan to maximize summer shade and to minimize winter shade. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 44. Renewable Energy System. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall offset 10 percent of project electricity demand through implementation of onsite renewable energy systems or through investment in offsite alternative energy systems. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 45. Drought Tolerant Landscaping. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce irrigation -related water demand by a minimum of 10 percent through the implementation of drought tolerant landscaping. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 46. Cool Roof Material. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall incorporate cool -roof materials into project design to reduce electricity demand associated with building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) by a minimum of 7 percent. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 47. Water Conservation Measures. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement immediate water conservation measures to reduce building water demand by 33 percent. Building water demand shall ultimately be reduced by 50 percent when the City's recycled water system is implemented. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 48. Energy Efficiency beyond Title 24 Standards. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce building energy demand beyond the 2005 Title 24 Standards by 26 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 49. Operation Solid Waste Reduction. The 300 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement a solid waste reduction program to reduce operational solid waste by a minimum of 10 percent (Climate Change, Planning Division); 50. Utilize Alternative Fueled Vehicles and Local Buildinq Materials. In accordance with BAAQMD BMPs, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate into the construction fleet a minimum of 15 percent of construction vehicles and equipment operated by alternative fuels. Further, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that a minimum of 10 percent of building materials are locally sourced, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 51. Conduct a Wetland Delineation. The Project Sponsor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a wetland delineation of the Project Site. This delineation shall be submitted to the Corps for verification prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the Project. If the Corps determines that the features in the Project Site are not jurisdictional, then no further mitigation would be required. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 52. Obtain Applicable Permits and Certifications. If the Corps determines that these features are jurisdictional, then the Project Sponsor must obtain a CWA Section 404 permit from the Corps, and a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB prior to issuance of any grading permits for the Project. A requirement of the permits will be compensation such that there is no net loss of wetlands. This compensation requirement can be satisfied through avoidance, onsite and/or offsite construction and preservation of wetlands or by purchase of mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. At certified mitigation banks, the Corps typically requires a minimum 1:1 ratio, but may require higher ratios for certain wetland types. (Biological Resources, Planning and Building Divisions); 53. Provide Flood Protection up to the 100-Year Flood Event plus Sea Level Rise for Underground Structures. To protect underground structures from sea level rise flood risks, prior to approving grading and/or building permits the City shall ensure that the project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements into all applicable project features using a flood elevation of at least 7.1feet. All below -ground structures, including storm drains, sewers, equipment facilities, and others, shall be flood proofed and designed to withstand hydrostatic forces and buoyancy from water surface elevations up to 7.1 feet in elevation. Certain portions of the shoreline open space may not be protected at the ultimate level of flooding, given proposed heights. However, developed areas of the Project would be protected. For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be developed to address end -of -century conditions. (Hydrology, Building Division and Public Works Department); EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 54. Provide Adequate Storm Flow Conveyance Capacity for Sea Level Rise Conditions. To ensure that the storm drain system conveyance capacity is not constricted by sea level rise at the outlets, the Project Sponsor shall design the storm drain system to adequately convey stormwater runoff at outlet water surface elevations equivalent to the 100-year flood event base elevation plus sea level rise of 55 inches (water surface elevation of 11.6 feet at the outlet). Prior to receiving a grading permit, the City shall review project designs and studies for adequacy of storm flow conveyance with an outlet surface water elevation of 11.6 feet and in accordance with City design standards. The City shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. The Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City Conditions of Approval into project designs, prior to receiving a grading permit. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 55. Provide Protection of Shoreline and Flood Protection Features from Hydrodynamic Forces from Sea Level Rise Conditions. Prior to receiving a grading permit, in order to ensure that the shoreline and flood protection features associated with the proposed project provide protection under sea level rise hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic conditions, the Project Sponsor shall prepare engineering studies to identify expected hydrodynamic forces for under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet and hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be implemented to address end -of -century conditions. The Project Sponsor shall design shoreline and flood protection features that could accommodate hydrodynamic forces from sea level rise conditions along wherever flood protection features are identified under Mitigation Measure HY-7.1 and at shoreline protection features for stability and integrity under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The Project Sponsor shall also design flood protection features for protection against hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). The City shall review designs and associated studies for conformance with City requirements and adequacy of design measures to withstand hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces associated with the design criteria. The Project Sponsor shall also design erosion protection along the shoreline set -back area for protection under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The City shall review designs and associated studies for adequacy in protecting the shoreline set -back area under these conditions. The City Public Works Department shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. Prior to receiving a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City and BCDC Conditions of Approval into project designs. MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICABLE TO THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 350 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SITE 56. Implement TDM Program as part of 350 Airport Boulevard Project. These measures could include: secure bicycle storage, showers and changing rooms, shuttle service, preferential parking for carpoolers, preferential parking for vanpoolers, commute assistance center, employees' surveys, video conferencing centers, on -site amenities accommodations, on -site bicycles for employees, child care services, guaranteed ride home program, transportation action plan, transportation management association, and coordination of TDM programs (Air Quality, Planning Division); EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 57. Implement enemy efficiency measures with 350 Airport Boulevard Protect. These measures could include: LEED certification or to exceed energy efficiency beyond Title 24 requirements which would further aid in reducing stationary source emissions (Air Quality; Planning and Building Divisions); 58. Incorporate GHG Reduction Measures for Maintenance Activities. The Project Sponsor shall provide infrastructure for the use of electric landscape equipment during landscaping activities, where feasible. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 59. Incorporate Trees and Vegetation into Project Design. Trees and other shade structures shall be incorporated into the Site Plan to maximize summer shade and to minimize winter shade. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 60. Renewable Energy System. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall offset 10 percent of project electricity demand through implementation of onsite renewable energy systems or through investment in offsite alternative energy systems. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 61. Drought Tolerant Landscaping The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce irrigation -related water demand by a minimum of 10 percent through the implementation of drought tolerant landscaping. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Parks Department); 62. Cool Roof Material. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall incorporate cool -roof materials into project design to reduce electricity demand associated with building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) by a minimum of 7 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 63. Water Conservation Measures. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement immediate water conservation measures to reduce building water demand by 33 percent. Building water demand shall ultimately be reduced by 50 percent when the City's recycled water system is implemented. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 64. EnemV Efficiency beyond Title 24 Standards. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall reduce building energy demand beyond the 2005 Title 24 Standards by 26 percent (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 65. Operation Solid Waste Reduction. The 350 Airport Boulevard Project shall implement a solid waste reduction program to reduce operational solid waste by a minimum of 10 percent. (Climate Change, Planning Division); 66. Implement a TDM program. The Project Sponsor shall ensure that future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site implement a TOM program similar to that described for the 300 Airport Boulevard Project, to reduce transportation -related GHG emissions. (Climate Change, Planning Division and Traffic Engineer); 67. Pursue LEED Certification. Future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site shall seek LEED Gold certification or equivalent for development per the recommendations of the City's Green Building Ordinance. The Project Sponsor shall submit draft LEED (or equivalent) checklists to the City Sustainability Coordinator for review and consultation. (Climate Change, Planning and Building Divisions); 68. Placement or Screening of HVAC Mechanical Equipment. All HVAC mechanical equipment shall be located more than 60 feet from the nearest property line. Alternatively, HVAC mechanical equipment may be installed in a noise enclosure sufficient to reduce ground -level noise levels at the nearest property boundary to 70 dBA CNEL or less. (Noise, Planning and Building Divisions); EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 69. Provide Flood Protection up to the 100-Year Flood Event plus Sea Level Rise for Underground Structures. To protect underground structures from sea level rise flood risks, prior to approving grading and/or building permits the City shall ensure that the project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements into all applicable -project features using a flood elevation of at least 7.1 feet. All below -ground structures, including storm drains, sewers, equipment facilities, and others, shall be flood proofed and designed to withstand hydrostatic forces and buoyancy from water surface elevations up to 7.1 feet in elevation. Certain portions of the shoreline open space may not be protected at the ultimate level of flooding, given proposed heights. However, developed areas of the Project would be protected. For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be developed to address end -of -century conditions. (Hydrology, Building Division and Public Works Department); 70. Provide Adequate Storm Flow Conveyance Capacity for Sea Level Rise Conditions. To ensure that the storm drain system conveyance capacity is not constricted by sea level rise at the outlets, the Project Sponsor shall design the storm drain system to adequately convey stormwater runoff at outlet water surface elevations equivalent to the 100-year flood event base elevation plus sea level rise of 55 inches (water surface elevation of 11.6 feet at the outlet). Prior to receiving a grading permit, the City shall review project designs and studies for adequacy of storm flow conveyance with an outlet surface water elevation of 11.6 feet and in accordance with City design standards. The City shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. The Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City Conditions of Approval into project designs, prior to receiving a grading permit (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 71. Provide Protection of Shoreline and Flood Protection Features from Hydrodynamic Forces from Sea Level Rise Conditions. Prior to receiving a grading permit, in order to ensure that the shoreline and flood protection features associated with the proposed project provide protection under sea level rise hydrodynamic andlor hydrostatic conditions, the Project Sponsor shall prepare engineering studies to identify expected hydrodynamic forces for under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet and hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). For the shoreline areas, an adaptive strategy would be implemented to address end -of -century conditions. The Project Sponsor shall design shoreline and flood protection features that could accommodate hydrodynamic forces from sea level rise conditions along wherever flood protection features are identified under Mitigation Measure HY-7.1 and at shoreline protection features for stability and integrity under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The Project Sponsor shall also design flood protection features for protection against hydrostatic forces from a water surface elevation of 8.1 feet (mean higher high water plus 55-inch sea level rise). The City shall review designs and associated studies for conformance with City requirements and adequacy of design measures to withstand hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces associated with the design criteria. The Project Sponsor shall also design erosion protection along the shoreline set -back area for protection under storm surge conditions (at least 2 percent wave run-up) and a base flood elevation of at least 11.6 feet. The City shall review designs and associated studies for adequacy in protecting the shoreline set -back area under these conditions. The City Public Works Department shall prepare Conditions of Approval, where necessary, to ensure that the design criteria are met. Prior to receiving a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall incorporate applicable City and BCDC Conditions of Approval into project designs. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); 72. Provide Flood Protection up to the 100-Year Flood Event plus Sea Level Rise for Above -Ground Structures. To protect structures and people from sea level rise risks at the 350 Airport Boulevard Site, EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Commercial Design Review Amendment 300 Airport Boulevard Effective November 2, 2017 prior to approving grading permits, the City shall ensure project design incorporates its floodplain development requirements for a flood depth of the identified 100-year flood hazard water surface elevation plus a 4.6-foot (55-inch) rise in sea level. At a minimum, the Project Site shall be graded to over 10 feet above msl and the finished floor elevation of all building finished floors shall be constructed to 14.5 feet (i.e., 2.9 feet above the 11.6-foot potential flood elevation), or as otherwise determined as grading plans are developed. (Hydrology, Public Works Department); and 73. Future Wind Tunnel Analysis. To reduce potential impacts associated with future development of the 350 Airport Boulevard Site, a wind tunnel analysis shall be conducted in order to ensure that future development of the Site is designed in a way to minimize wind shadow effects at surrounding windsurfing areas. (Wind and Recreation, Planning Division). C ci m a Q 0 m C)* o CD -0 0 C v -'' ��D O _ CD o n -• O v O O c 3 Q c o M. 0 C m o CD `< o 0-0 CD CD O v 0 � CD 5 O �• CQ � CQ v CD o : r,- = CD CD 3 0 CD cn CD 3 �' -0 O O F O O CD (D CD 0_ O v0 cn� C70 � O COD CD 0 O cCDn CD 0 o CD < 0 n c v Z3 :3 (D CD O `� O O m �' Ov mcn0' CDC cn v o 3 v O O O CD �+ O D CD - 3 cn C D CD CD cn CD -O CD 0 :3 CD Q O p On-O CC) � CD vCP � L mN Cis 73 Cc CD CD o aao CD M 3 v CD �� �M �CD Z -CD�< �"" CL CD o < O O �_ -BCD 3. -F)'3: �CD cD zTm 3.a ��a -0 L v � (o O 1 O � m _ CD m -• Z W c 'a � o CD < CD v� w o a o e p ;a CD 0 o c c co m CD a CDr _. O a � -• a r co O N _ C — CD —_CD 2 C o 0 C� co CD _. fa 0 C a S ca CD c to zJ 0 v CD T Q CD o O v W Z O ��Cm a CDo E. , 3 c cn cn > ;u o N m � a te. O M n, cp m cn r � � no g o z� v r, C a (D- m c�0mz ccri CO= o v a o > 0 0m0 _ �F CD o„ ^ -( G A D r D rn' 000� m o X CD �n < r—% m rn z CD � rncri o 0 co n a N= O m rn D Lm v O CO V CD C) m � C 00 00 'a mm z BURLINGAME POINT PROJECT BURLINGAME, CA GENSLER I GENZON OCTOBER 4, 2017 OCT -5 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 BUILDING 03 PE 2 O ' O i NTHOUSE PANNING COMMISSION APPROVA — WV T L AUGUST 22, 2016 T b RpH]ER .SEE IANOBfPPEIXKS. I 1 �.t�i�.�i �. ���.�.ti l � vvv�vvtiti-�v-�vv�vv viva. �� ti vltivti vtititi v 1 til � vv � MEGWIICl15CBEFH BUOWRE — i d _.� MRMCE I r - VEST. 1 --�:,� ESPEVESi. - - ELEV LPBBY rNma �'�oe9 VEST&3 - \ � Ii IEcxz I I _- s � M I P] N04 I h / -------- — -- -------- — Ik ---- ----------------J ELEV l k\q ' CUUMMTh WiE 8MLER LOHMOL _a_NOS3 �J C MECN4NItl.LSCREEN �ti) j 1 ENCLOSURE CNxLERRWV -.4� �4_•�-_.�--4_=`�__z,4.-_. =__O t o � o —i r I ' WVIrsEnEsrus.m. I I I I BUILDING 3 PENTHOUSE PERMIT APPL I I I II I I II I I I CATION MAY 1212017 �J I BUILDING 4 PENTHOUSE PANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 3 1 4 S i 6 7 8) 9 10 11 I I I I nzno. I I u,l, I FlANIERS. SEE.SWE LVIGS 1 LIISi0A1METP1 GPiE Ic I I e it tivl 1� tj b T--------------------- LVSfOMMETRLGRiE 1ECHI �Rp1J1 -�-' ® MHi rr EYE LOIY _ CRCgI MEY i.� E L060T �. AIP.1M [ C PH�6R _. tt Pi Cl=C �rC Fl. p MRA COHIR0. T 6� J - %qN _RGOY PH9J_ tGY � t t MECHTIG ,ttt RWf SCREEN f C(tl rl O I �1 0 +r t .°.-.--.- - -- -°- _. ° 0 _ 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. o o / UA"TPECESJN. WP. BUILDING 4 PENTHOUSE PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 I 3 4 4.8 5 I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --Will 15 � r- �OJ I 'reap, I -_I�_-_} "( ----ILI r —TT _____ , III IA III ul III II III III 1 -1- --- I I I 1 1 1 F' I I. i �e e� - 4{ 4 e.____� 1j �1111 _ ® 1ilry' ♦ I RR4�s���T• Tr� - I�J � ���� EI I t� ..�•� I I ;.--x��.; I�;Yfi I _II I._'r c, / r`—rsaxna __#_=_-1v © y t I I /1111i1 +lulu I III µµII I 15 - I. i� III `uul L- I � - I 0 0 BUILDING 3 ELEVATION - SOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 T r s ii mp„oil ELEVATION - BOI (DING M - B W i BUILDING 3 ELEVATION - EAST PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 ELEATION BUILOING03 EAST PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 ELERTIDN-BUILDINGO] -FAST BUILDING 3 ELEVATION - NORTH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 T T T T T^q Y PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 r Y LLBVA ON BOILBINGOB-NORTH EIEVATON-BUILDING OB-NORiN I BUILDING 3 ELEVATION - WEST PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 ELEVA1I0N-BUILDING03 WEST PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 I ELEVATION BUILBING03-WEST BUILDING 4 ELEVATION - SOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 (� Y s 1 ELEVATION-BULOINOm-BOUiN 1 ELEVATION-BUWIWM-BOM I BUILDING 4 ELEVATION - EAST PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 LLEV IGN BUILGINGN FAST 1 LLEV 10N-BURIDNGN FAST BUILDING 4 ELEVATION - NORTH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 o Q Q T Y 1 0u� e � styHIN �r PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 n all b, -- ----- -- ------ ME TON-euiwixcw-xoxtx eavnnau-eunnixc w-xomx BUILDING 4 ELEVATION - WEST PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL AUGUST 22, 2016 ELEVATIONS BUILDINGW WEST PERMIT APPLICATION MAY 12, 2017 I ELEtl 10N BUILDINGM WEST CITY O p ipQRATED , Monday, October 23, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda Planning Commission 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON -AGENDA 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Planning Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Planning Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although the provision of a name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each; the Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 6. STUDY ITEMS 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. 8. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS a. 1357 Columbus Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for building height for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Section 15303 (a). (Chu Design Associates, applicant and designer; Steven F. Baldwin and Therese M. Baldwin TR, property owners) (60 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 1357 Columbus Ave - Staff Report 1357 Columbus Ave - Attachments 1357 Columbus Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 City of Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 1011912017 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda October 23, 2017 b. 1411 De Soto Avenue. zoned R-1 - ADDlication for Desian Review for a first and second floor addition to an existing single family dwelling. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e)(2). (Scott and Leanne Duong, applicant and property owners; Thomas Biggs, Biggs Group Architecture, architect) (57 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 1411 De Soto Ave. - Staff Report 1411 De Soto Ave. -Attachments 1411 De Soto Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 C. 852 Paloma Avenue. zoned R-1 - ADDlication for Desian Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling and a new detached garage. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (e)(2).(Jesse Geurse, applicant and designer; Rick Lund, property owner) (68 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Attachments: 852 Paloma Ave - Staff Report.pdf 852 Paloma Ave - Attachments 852 Paloma Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 d. 300 Airport Boulevard, zoned APN - Application for Amendment of the Design Review approval of an office/life science development ("Burlingame Point") (Genzon Investment Group, applicant; Burlingame Point LLC, property owner; Gensler, Architect) (23 noticed) Staff Contact: Kevin Gardiner Attachments: 300 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 300 Airport Blvd - Attachments 300 Airport Blvd - Plans - 10.23.17 9. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY a. 1355 Laguna Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (Joann Gann, applicant and designer; Ryan and Wendy Vance, property owners) (70 noticed) Staff contact: Catherine Keylon Attachments: 1355 Laguna Ave - Staff Report and Attachments 1355 Laguna Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 b. 521 Burlingame Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Patrick R. Gilson, applicant and property owner; Stewart Associates, architect) (56 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 521 Burlingame Ave - Staff Report 521 Burlingame Ave - Attachments 521 Burlingame Ave - Plans - 10.23.17 City of Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 1011912017 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda October 23, 2017 C. 21 Park Road, zoned BMU - Application for Design Review and Condominium Permit for a new 3-story, 7-unit residential condominium building (Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect; GGH Investment LLC, property owner) (79 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachments: 21 Park Rd - Staff Report 21 Park Rd - Attachments 21 Park Rd - Plans - 10.23.17 10. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS 11. DIRECTOR REPORTS - Commission Communications - City Council regular meeting October 16, 2017 2209 Ray Drive - FYI for review of proposed changes to a previously approved Design Review project. Attachments: 2209 Ray Dr - FYI 12. ADJOURNMENT Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on October 23, 2017. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on November 2, 2017, the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $533, which includes noticing costs. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Community Development/Planning counter, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. City of Burlingame Page 3 Printed on 1011912017 r n ro 0 7, 4q' ff F-r^,UT [t LffVA i �dQ 1i Al W00�7i t rL- - .. roc k I Ito .0 ___ ---- — - ! --- --- Toni -yT Lt_. V1I ki re')tUS -To _. 1-4 -N�44 '-- j Lil Y r0 t% �3, 2 cr REVISIONS BY a� c� �+ o j Rj N 00 U O 4-1 G\ 400 M (h LrI U U 0 Z �0w o cn - O � Q -0 ct Cd W .,..� V L L Date 5, ,A - Scale` —rr-r Drawn , j(L---1 Job (-7 2Lf Sheet Of I Sheets cLEaeaRMU r , cep 1 c:..:,NT L E,vATIou L EVk:T 1 �9 [� CEi ��2DUT �I���/PTION (6) LEFT t L r-:\/ATj �Q ��4tlz 1 ! 4) 10 REVISIONS BY � N O C C�d U 00 o r h 4 od 0 - V v'41 00'o� o o ° w N K!faTtt.��� Cd • 4� Cd .� V Ln - co cad co 1% > r--, Date O -;7 , 17 Scale N 0-j-r q Drawn Jm f Job Sheet Of 7 Sheets CLEWFUNTO Alcon Engineering 650-308-5228 Steve Devich, C.E., L.S. Garage Corners: Ms. Jo Ann Gan Re: 1355 Laguna Ave. Front Left (south Laguna) 8.93 Vance Residence APN: 026-084-010 Front Right (northerly Laguna) 8.47 Rear Left (southerly interior corner) 9.80 1355 Laguna Avenue Spot Elevations Rear Right (northerly interior corner) 9.00 Burlingame, CA May 18, 2017 Crawispace: Access Pt. (@ northwest house corner) 6.13 Dear Sirs: Per the your request, we have completed our elevation survey of 1355 Laguna Ave. Reference elevation is City of Burlingame Benchmark #154 , top of northwesterly curb at the intersection of Grove Ave. and California Dr. The results of our survey follow below: Property Corners: Elevations (ft) Front Left (southerly Laguna) 8.74 Front Right (northerly Laguna) 6.26 Rear Left (interior corner) M05 Rear Right (northerly Grove) 6/.47 16' Setbacks: Front Left (southerly Laguna) 8.67- Front Right (northerly Laguna) 6.60 Rear Left (interior corner) 9.35 Rear Right (northerly Grove) 7.70 Top -of -Curb Prolongation from Front Property Corners: Front Left (southerly Laguna) 8.63 Front Right (north rly Laguna) 6.16 Front Right (southerly Grove) 6.15 Rear Left (northerly Grove) 6.24 House Corners: Front Left (south Laguna) 7.97 Front Right (northerly Laguna / southerly Grove) 7.30 Rear Left (interior corner) 8.07 Rear Right (northerly Grove) 7.50 House Finish Floor: Building Finish Floor (FF) Front 9.03 +c P..S. 9298 1 * EXP 9/30/18 1125 Byron Street, Palo Alto, CA 94302 :' 1125 Byron Street, Palo Alto, CA 94302 r SITE INFORMATION I ` PROPERTY ADDRESS 1355 LAGUNA AVENUE SHEET INDEX o b O r - 1o, _�_ t.._ __,......_._ .r SITE AREA 5,000 S.F. 1 SITE PLAN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 026-084-010 2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN ZONE DISTRICT .-{-_ SECOND FLOOR PLAN/ O O i O; O ;g Ott OCCUPANCY GROUP R3/U 3 '° ZS CONSTRUCTION TYPE V/N SECTION Njp i6 W AVE NUMBER OF STORIES TWO STORY 4 ELEVATIONS 5° ® s. 5 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN BUILDING SITE COVERAGE ti 0. EXISTIN PROPOSED TOTAL ...� FIRST FLOOR 1,407 2 SF 94.6 SF 1,501 8 SF 6 EXISTING ELEVATIONS o ® BMP BEST MANAGENENT PRACTICES OD _ __. ... _ ._ SECOND FLOOR 960.5 SF 960.5 SF GARAGE 370 SF 370 SF TOTAL 1,777.2 SF 1,055.1 SF 2,832.3 SF CONTACTS BUILDING DESIGN FRONT PORCH (100 SF EXEMPT) 118.2 SF 2.2 SF 116 SF AVE. JO ANN GAN N TOTAL EXISTING 95 4 SF 2 FULTON STREET O U 8 O 1,8 1,052.9 SF 2,948.3 SF 44 -100 SF REDWOOD CITY, CA 94o62 `- 2,848.3 SF 650-464-9182 - - Ni' - ~ `' w .. _ (32 x 5,000) +900 + 350 = 2,850 MAX FAR 0 w 4 t U -" O o m "' LOT COVERAGE 87.8 SF OWNER 19 •� RYANJWENDY VANCE --- -- - - wee, Q Q ; ro v QQ I a 40% MAX. 2,000 0 last to tn_ _ 1355 LAGUNA AVENUE APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS B U R LI N GAME, CA California Residential Code 2016 (CBC) 415-518-0067 California Building Code 2016 (CRC) _ California Fire Code 2016 (CFC) California Plumbing Code 2016 (CPC) SCOPE OF WORK: California Electrical Code 2016 (CEC) California Mechanical Code 2016 (CMC) ADDITION TO FIRST FLOOR FOR KITCHEN, STAIRS AND LIVING. California Energy Code 2016 (CEnQ NEW SECOND FLOOR WITH THREE BEDROOMS, TWO BATHS AND California Green Building Standards Code 2016 (CALGreen) LAUNDRY ROOM. All other state & local ordinances & regulations "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 8:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: No Work Allowed (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non -City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Note: Construction hours for work in the public right of way must now be included on the plans. QV-- r {T kltL.l. ��i- • L��L.l�� Llt�Tl,-, Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been final. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. LOT COVERAGE 1) 1.5X15.3=22.9 2) 13 X 29.85 = 388 3) 7.5X23=172.5 4) 14X21 =294 5) 1.8 X 32.3 = 383.1 6) 1.5 X 11.5 = 17.2 7) 18.5X7=129.5 TOTAL 1407.2 NEW 8) 2X12=24 9) 2.3X14=32.6 10)2X14=28 11)2X5=10 TOTAL= 94.6 12) 4 X 26.5 = 106 13)5X2=10 TOTAL = 116 SF (100 SQ FT EXEMPT) TOTAL = 16 SF 14)19 X 14.1 = 269.1 15) 1.6 X 10 = 16.6 16) 1.6 X 10 = 16.6 17) 29.85 X 18.7 = 559.6 18)4.6X 16=74.6 19)2X 12=24 TOTAL = 960.5 SF REVISIONS BY 10 N � o 0 �'�`� 0 .� ICn n S -� U o rn nab H Ct� O � 0 �O C� Cd •� L I Lo 1"1 a) cd co 1:4 > r - . 4 Date �-:5 • %�,, 1-7 ScalleA.�_� NODE�(7 Drawn Job 1 Sheet Of -� Sheets t4 X 9e CLEWFUNTs City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 521 Burlingame Avenue Item No. 9b Design Review Study Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Patrick R. Gilson Architect: Stewart Associates General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 029-254-010 Lot Area: 5,811 SF Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing split-level house and attached garage to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and garage will have a total floor area of 3,014 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,040 SF (0.52 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including covered porch exemption). The new single family dwelling will contain four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on -site. One covered parking space is provided in the detached garage (12'-0" x 20'-0" clear interior dimensions); one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. The applicant is requesting the following application: ■ Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)). 521 Burlingame Avenue Lot Area: 5,811 SF Plans date stamped: October 5, 2017 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................................................................... Front (1st fir): 15'-2" 15-2" (block average) (2nd fir): ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................................................................... 20'-0" 20'-0" Side (exterior— 15f fir): 10'-0" to bay window 7'-6" (exterior— 2"d fir): average of 14'-0" average of 12'-0" (interior): ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................................................................... 9'-1 " 6'-0" Rear (1st fir): 31'-10" 15'-0" (2nd fir): ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................................................................... 47'-4" 20'-011 Lot Coverage: 1968 SF 2324 SF 33.8% 40% ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:..................................................................................................................................... FAR: 3014 SF 3040 SF' 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR (0.32 x 5811 SF) + 900 SF + 280 SF = 3040 SF (0.52 FAR) Design Review 521 Burlingame Avenue Lot Area: b,61 1 5F # of bedrooms: ................................................................... Off -Street Parking: Building Height: ........................................................... DH Envelope: Staff Comments: None. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner PROPOSED 4 1 covered (12' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ............................................................................. 28'-1" ............................................................................. complies c. Patrick R. Gilson, applicant and property owner Stewart Associates, architect Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Project Explanation Letter, dated August 22, 2017 Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 13, 2017 Aerial Photo 521 Burlingame Avenue Plans date stamped: Uctober b, 2U1 ALLOWED/REQUIRED 1 covered (10' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') ........................................................................... 30'-0" ............................................................................. CS 25.26.075 K COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Ed Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit Kf Parcel #: 029-254-010 V Zoning / Other: R-1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 521 BURLINGAME AVENUE APPLICANT Name: 521 BURLINGAME AVE LLC Address: 1731 ADRIAN RD #13 City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Phone: 650-440-2204 E-mail: patrickgilson@gmail.com ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: STEWART ASSOCIATES Address: 1351 LAUREL ST City/State/Zip: SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 Phone: 650-591-8283 E-mail: John@stewartassocaia.com Burlingame Business License #: 26167 PROPERTY OWNER Name: 521 BURLINGAME AVE LLC Address: 1731 ADRIAN RD #13 City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Phone: 650-440-2204 E-mail: patrickgilson@gmail.com RECEIVE® AUG 2 3 2017 CITY OF BURLINGAME Authorization to Reproduce Project Plans: CDD-P! f!NN!NG DIV. I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. JLS (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMOLITION OF (E) ONE-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE; (N) TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W/ (N) DETACHED ONE -CAR GARAGE; (N) LANDSCAPING AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: :?/Z?117 I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. l Property owner's signature: Date: Date submitted: 0123117 S; �HANDOUTSI PC Application. doc ON STEWART ■■ EM ASSOCIATES MM RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIORS August 22, 2017 Planning Commission ak Community Development Department,& c ',,v 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94040i RE: Planning Commission Submittal for 521 Burlingame Avenue Ci T Y QF E LURUNGANIE Dear Commission Members: The project we are submitting for your review is a new two-story, single-family residence with a new detached one -car garage at 521 Burlingame Avenue. The project sits at the corner of Burlingame Avenue and Clarendon Road, with the front entry facing Burlingame Avenue. The surrounding neighborhood is predominantly Mediterranean with some Ranch style homes, so our project was designed in the Spanish Revival style to blend in with the predominant architectural tapestry. Custom details such as scalloped roof rake, accent window, tiles and pony walls, as well as wood corbels and wrought iron planter boxes add a level of refinement. Since our project is a corner lot, we paid special attention to the articulation of massing on both sides of street frontage. The first -floor setback facing Clarendon Road was pushed back to 12 feet from the property line, even though the code allows for 7.5 feet, and the second floor was pushed back even further to 14.5 feet. Additional architectural elements such as covered porch, bay window, cantilever and recessed walls break up the massing even further, which also help to bring the house down to human scale. A modest detached one -car garage at the rear of the property provides the necessary off- street parking, while the new driveway was moved to the Clarendon Road side to avoid adding traffic to the busier Burlingame Avenue. All in all, we are confident this new home will be a positive addition to the surrounding neighborhood as well as the city of Burlingame. Sincerely, John L. Stewart, AIA 1351 Laurel Street • San Carlos, CA 94070 • phone: 650.591 • 8283 fax: 650.591 • 9578 www.stewartassocaia.com • stewartassocaia@aol.com CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD _ BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 521 BURLINGAME AVENUE The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 521 BURLINGAME AVENUE zoned R-1. APN 029-254-010 Mailed: October 13, 2017 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) s. '600 341 �� 4 341 s r4 �. r X l k S u' cn 1 . ti' y�. r40 70 Irl 600. _' ,+y _ � pg. � �' „ r • .. � y r � ^' i a i sr �c, •a a .sLs ? �� r a• �� 'i tip'; • ti ,�� r • s c �� SOS v pp••Y '�'S Z� it `��,Q` r_ �1S + � .�, ��'t 1.�� 7�+. �� Ar G Sr ,yew r tit s41�? �j r ry an a tTO� Q s 44 �, �a . � � }�` � s � •ram tit$ r, �,,1�� ` j=. � L s ' bjrp 'i yi _ A A LEFT REAR VIEW r ,+ i1 co °° z W N co z -- �Q � a , v.o O �Q 0 U vl OG - � letW �, O zcc �Q U M� � W z ii V w W H xQ cr Z) Cr) Date10/04/17 TYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS: 2-PIECE BARREL TILE ROOF WROUGHT IRON PLANTER BOX, PAINT 46.29 12 4 46.29 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 12 4 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 6X DECORATIVE WOOD CORBEL, PAINT 2X WOOD BELLY BAND, PAINT RAKE TILE W/ SCALLOP DETAIL DECORATIVE CLAY PIPE RAKE VENT SHAPED STUCCO CHIMNEY CAP r ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW W/ SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITES 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER, PAINT 19.13 AVG GR 1 30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46.29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 4 CUSTOM SOLID WOOD DOOR, STAIN 12 4 �� Ilmllml FRONT ELEVATION � I P N rG J III V�'� II II I IIII I II REAR ELEVATION ' 46.29 I I N UPPER LEVEL PL 40.58 \ 0) \ UPPER LEVEL F.F. 31.50 N MAIN LEVEL PL-' 30.33 MAIN LEVEL F.F. 20.25 - 0 AVG. T.O.C.'N 18.24 HALF ROUND COPPER GUTTER WROUGHT IRON EXTERIOR LIGHT N O EO N 19.26 AVG GR _ UPPER LEVEL PL 40.58 _ UPPER LEVEL F.F. 1 31.50 iv MAIN LEVEL PL -' 30.33 I ■ I ■ w z_ J , W O MAIN LEVEL F.F. 20.25 I> w W z w Q ww Q (.) 2i U Z< ozl � Q w� c� �� z (n J WN � ZLO 00 Date 10/04/17 Scale 1 /4" = 1'-0" Drawn ML Job 1731 Sheet A4 Of Sheets DECORATIVE CLAY PIPE RAKE VENT TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE RAKE TILE W/ SCALLOP DETAIL TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE — EXTERIOR LIGHT TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE CUSTOM SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR, PAINT GARAGE PL GARAGE F.F. 19.75 FRONT ELEVATION 31.62 LEFT ELEVATION 31.62 _ GARAGE PL. :.. 28.75 0 REAR ELEVATION 31.62 RIGHT ELEVATION HALF ROUND COPPER GUTTER TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE BARREL TILE TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE ALUM. CLAD WOOD WINDOW TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER PAINTED TO MATCH MAIN HOUSE GARAGE PL GARAGE F.F. 0 -v 1-HOUR FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY 21'-6" FLOOR PLAN D.S. I I CLASS W ROOF ASSEMBLY W/ BARREL TILE TO MATCH N MAIN HOUSE I � I I I I I I I I I I I I N I I � I I I I I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — D.S. ROOF PLAN GARAGE PLANS SCALE: 1 /4"=1'0" 0 2 4 8 00 W Q U W W • •s • • - • • • W D z W Q LIJ W Q (.) 2i U z < W W (.9 Z (1) J W O� z 0� Z 3:00 j 0� W� N D ZLO m Date 10/04/17 Scale 1 /4" = 1'-0" Drawn ML Job 1731 Sheet A5 Of Sheets D.S. ROOF PLAN 00 W Q U W W •s • • • • • W z W W W Q (.) C) zQ W W C� z -- Q Cn J C� W O� z 0� Z - m J W� N D ZLO m Date 10/04/17 Scale As indicated Drawn ML Job 1731 Sheet A3 Of Sheets GENERAL NOTES 1. RULES AND REGULATIONS ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND SHALL BE PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS. 2. NEGOTIATED CONTRACT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED FOR A NEGOTIATED CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. NOT ALL CONDITIONS AND DETAILS ARE SHOWN. IT SHALL BE THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SELECT ALL FINISHES AND FIXTURES. 3. OWNERSHIP OF DRAWINGS THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STEWART ASSOCIATES AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE THE SITE AND EXISTING STRUCTURES TO DETERMINE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO DISCOVER CONDITIONS THAT ARE VISIBLE WHICH AFFECT THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK. 5. COORDINATION OF WORK THE LIMITS OF THE WORK ARE ESTABLISHED BY THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING TRADES PEOPLE WITHIN THESE LIMITS. 6. EXAMINATION OF PLANS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL EXAMINE ALL SYSTEMS AND DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK REQUIRED. THESE SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE BID. 7. DESIGN DATA OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-31 U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V-B 8. CODES ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CODES: 2016 CBC, 2016 CMC, 2016 CPC, 2016 CEC, 2016 CEEC, 2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN, 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES, INCLUDING ALL AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN ORDINANCE 1889. N49030'06"E 58.10' +I ± 16.60' Y 20' - 0" m Y / o w U (N) CONC. DRIVEWAY • (N)GARAGE w (E) CONIC. PAD TO o U • BE DEMOLISHED 0 z O N � II • I � i 0 I I (N) PAVER WALKWAY •� I I I IxI I I I • I I I o o I I o — Lu o • I (N) PAVER PATIO i - Cn c� Cl) - - - - IIo I •" 0 Iz I Iz F 8.10' (N) WH I • I SIDE S.B. ± 6.60' (N) WOOD GATE ± 9.10' (N) PAVER WALKWAY (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED TOP OF CURB ELEV. PER SURVEY 17.87 (N) CONIC. GUTTER Ilium llu llil 114 llil llil�� 10.00, I 14.50' .o 0 I0 0 z I �• I I I \ \112' - 011 2ND FL S.B. 7'-6" do 1ST FL S.B. • • Y \ U \�Q 00 Y 0 Lu CD m N J 0 N U)z J 0 I I N49030'00"E 58.10' (N) CONC. SIDEWALK 18" TREE 0 BURLINGAME AVENUE (701 R/W) NOTE: 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SURVEY FOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION. 2. GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 18.61 SITE PLAN I Y >J W 0 F U z O U s OI SSCO 21" TREE O DEMOLISH (E) WOOD FENCE (N) DRIVEWA` APRON PLANNING DATA GENERAL A. P. N. 029-254-010 ZONING R-1 LOT AREA 5811 SF HEIGHT LIMIT MAX. ALLOWABLE 30 FT LOT COVERAGE 40% LOT AREA 2324 SF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA HOUSE r 32% LOT AREA + 900 SF 2760 SF DETACHED GARAGE U) UP TO 350 SF <_350 SF (E) TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. i (E) RESIDENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED SEWER LINE, SEE SURVEY FOR MORE INFO. Cn Cn LINE OF UPPER LEVEL N\ I..L Q O Z O� 0 Z ui I..f_ Q U (E) CONC. WALKWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED SCALE: 1 /8"=1'0" 024 8 U) U) Cn Cn SETBACKS 1ST/2ND FRONT 15'2"/20' FT SIDE - INTERIOR 6'/DHE* FT SIDE - EXTERIOR 7'6"/12' FT REAR 15'/20' FT *DHE=DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE PROPOSED LOT COV. MAIN RESIDENCE 1651 SF COV. PORCH 30 SF DETACHED GARAGE 280 SF TOTAL 1961 SF PROPOSED FLOOR AREA MAIN LEVEL 1651 SF UPPER LEVEL 1107 SF HOUSE TOTAL 2758 SF GARAGE 280 SF GRAND TOTAL 3038 SF OCATION MAP n C C 09 ,90'LS I .os 90'LDI '9'1 '951 'Q'1• o_ Y/ r OZ /Z o Lr1o1 os ,LI1SI e/ 6 6/ zz . •6Z'LSl '9:L ,Zb'L01 ,OS 9 >yz ,os'L01 — 0 L 9/ ® `I as-Ls1 ` Q 8 S/ ,L�'Ls1 0 '5 b/ t GL'Ls( 951 ,51'Ls .05 ,os ,BS 0/ C/ 0 .. ,BS . . uus '3Ad SITE Z E/ i/ Oi O O 0/ £ 5 Z s� 6 6� 0 9 Sc 0 0 L oL Lsi 9a OOL L9 os „ 9 '9 b £ 0 O O O cc os AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK ADDRESS NO. FRONT SETBACK 505 15'-011 509 15'-211 511 15'-1 11 515 15'-411 AVERAGE 15'-2" BURLINGAME NOTES AS OF OCTOBER 19, 2016, THE WORKING HOURS HAVE CHANGED AS FOLLOWS CONSTRUCTION HOURS WEEKDAYS: 8:OOAM - 7:0013M SATURDAYS: 9:OOAM - 6:OOPM SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS: NO WORK ALLOWED SEE CITY OF BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 13.04.100 FOR DETAILS. *COSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE LIMITED TO WEEKDAYS AND NON -CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:OOAM AND 5:OOPM. m w Q 0 U U7 w 0 > w • • • • LLI z Li w LIJ U� U z < 1jj jjj (.9 C) Z 2 -- Q U) J z 0� Lu z Lo m Date 10/04/17 Scale 1 /8" = 1'-0" Drawn ML Job 1731 Sheet Al Of Sheets REVISIONS — x x W% GRAVENGOSNONES �N) FI REFIT 20" TALL *NATURAL GAS 15 (N) STEPPING STONES *SET FLUSH W/ LAWN WOOD PLUS 1 211 11 LATTICE FENCING ADJACENT RESIDENCE (N) EVERGREEN PRIVACY SHRUBS — x PAW EL (N) (N) 0-0" STUCCO FENCE PANEL *MATCH HOUSE INCLUDING 0-0" WOOD PEDESTRIAN GATE I � (E) 12 ADJACENT DRIVEWAY (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY SPECS * REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT PERMIT (N) DROUGHT TOLERANT WM vw, GROUNDCOVER ❑ (N) 0-0" SOLID WOOD PLUS 1 2" LATTICE FENCING X X X X X X X X X - (N) GARAGE (N) STONE LANDING — 'I El-- � (N) LAWN WIN I�I�II�II I lil`Ir��� �TI ILI I lM0�1 2 (N) 3' TALL BBQ / 04, • C 2 COUNTERTOP W/ (N) GRAVEL G" BACKSPLASH PATH V� STORAGE BELOW 2 (N) EVERGREEN TREES 10 r G i 2 I (N) 3, 1 II G C RESIDENCE I—= 7 10 Y� 7 k 1 7 •C- I 1 1 (N) STONE LANDING / STEPS 7\ \� 3 I � ` I (N) STEPPINGI I n 91 9 9 1 STONES 10 10 13 I ` 4 4 (E) UTILITY (N) STEPPING --/ METERS STONES *SAND SET B U R L I N GAM E 70' K.O.W. 24"LIQUID OJS� O GI GI � (N) 12 LAWN 9110010 Gf,N� I2 51'LIQ) (N) G'-0" SOLID WOOD PLUS 1 2" LATTICE VEHICULAR SLIDING GATE *MATCH FENCING (N) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON *INSTALL PER CITY STDS / SPECS *REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT PERMIT (E) LIQUIDAMBAR STREET TREES TO REMAIN NOTE: (E) STREET TREES MAY NOT BE CUT, TRIMMED OR REMOVED WITHOUT CITY PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FROM PARKS DEPT C1 Q O L� (N) DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY SPECS * REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT PERMIT z O C) z> 11J o / O U (N) 0-0" SOLID WOOD PLUS 1 2" LATTICE FENCING (N) 0-0" STUCCO FENCE PANEL *MATCH HOUSE INCLUDING 0-0" WOOD PEDESTRIAN GATE (E) LIQUIDAMBAR STREET TREES TO REMAIN NOTE: (E) STREET TREES AVENUE MAY NOT BE CUT, TRIMMED OR REMOVED WITHOUT CITY PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FROM PARKS DEPT PLANT LIST 9/27/17 GILSON RESIDENCE, 521 BURLINGAME AVE 5YM 5CIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QTY 51zE I GROWTH I WUCOL5 ' TREES A Acer rubrum Red Maple I 3G" BOX FAST M B Syagru5 romanzoffianum Queen Palm 1 24" BOX MOD. L C Lauru5 nobih5 'Saratoga' (5td) Grecian Laurel 4 24" BOX MOD. L SHRUBS / PERENNIALS I Hemerocalh5 'Dwarf Red Daylily 13 1 GAL MOD. M 2 Anigozanthos `Dwarf Red' Kangaroo Paw I G I GAL FAST L 3 Aeonium arboreum Aeonium 2 5 GAL MOD. L 4 RoSa 'Flowering Carpet' Groundcover Ro5e 7 2 GAL MOD. M 5 Fe5tuca ovina var. glauca Blue Fescue I GAL MOD. L G RoSa 'Iceberg' Iceberg Rose 7 5 GAL FAST M 7 RoSmarinu5 officinah5 'Tuscan Blue' Ro5emary 4 15 GAL FAST L 8 Pieri5 Japonica 'Mt Fire' Japanese Pieri5 3 15 GAL SLOW M 9 Olea europaea'Montra' Little 011ie Dwarf Olive 9 5 GAL SLOW L 10 Strelitzia nicolai Giant Bird of Paradise 7 5 GAL MOD. M I I Loropetalum chinen5e Fringe Flower G 15 GAL MOD. L 12 Agave attenuata Fox Tail Agave 7 5 GAL MOD. L 13 Alyogyne huegelii Blue HIb15cU5 1 5 GAL FAST L 14 Phormlum 'Yellow Wave' Yellow Wave Flax 8 5 GAL MOD. L 15 Pitto5porum tenuifolium Pitto5porum 20 5 GAL MOD. M VINES V- I Clytostoma call15tegoide5 Violet Trumpet Vine 5 15 GAL MOD. M V-2 Bougainvillea 'San Diego' Bougainvillea 1 15 GAL MOD. L V-3 Trachelo5permum Ja5minoide5 (staked) Star Ja5mine 9 5 GAL MOD. M GROUNDCOVERS G- I IFe5tuca rubra IRed Fescue 825 5f ROLLS MOD. L FRONTYARD GRASS Native Mow Free Blend, Delta Bluegrass Co. (800) 637-6073 330 sf ROLLS SLOW - L BACKYARD LAWN Bolero Plus Blend, Delta Bluegrass Co. (600) 637-8873 78G 5f ROLLS SLOW - h 'lawn not included in calculations, See area calc5 TOTAL QTY: 4G I L VL QTY: 389 54. 4% V L O 5f O city L 1.159 5f 389 city M 2 14 5f 72 city NON -TURF IRRIGATED AREA: 1.373 H O 5f O qty GENERAL NOTES I . CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE PROPOSED WORK PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ON 51TE ALL GRADES, PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, 51TE IMPROVEMENTS, WATERPROOFING AND UNDERGROUND PIPING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. ALL DISCREPANCIES OR PROBLEMATIC SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, 3. WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. TH15 WORK MAY INCLUDE LANDSCAPING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, NEW CURB DRAINS, AND PARKING STRIP. 4. FINISHED GRADES SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE PROPERLY INSTALLED TO PREVENT ANY STANDING WATER. ALL HARD5CAPE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM GRADE OF 2% UNLE55 NOTED OTHERWISE. JUTE MESH ER0510N CONTROL NETTING SHALL BE USED ON ALL 3:1 OR GREATER SLOPES � STAKED APPROPRIATELY. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR EXISTING TREES BY INSTALLING TEMPORARY FENCING AROUND THE TREES AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE DRIPLINE. IN THE EVENT THAT TREE ROOTS OVER G" ARE DISCOVERED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHOULD BE CONTACTED. G. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, � OTHER ENGINEERING DRAWINGS / DOCUMENT5 FOR WORK IN RELEVANT AREAS. 7. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY MAKE 51TE OBSERVATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BUT SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED TO SUPERVISE CONSTRUCTION ON51TE. PLANTING NOTES I . LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLANT AND 50D QUANTITIES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID FOR WORK. 2, ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS OF NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NURSERY t LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION. 3. PLANT MATERIAL CANNOT BE GUARANTEED AS DEER RESISTANT DUE TO CHANGING HABITS OF DEER. 4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A LAYER OF BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2 INCHES, WITH A CHIP 51ZE OF NO LE55 THAN ONE INCH. A 2 INCH LAYER OF GREENWA5TE MULCH UNDER THE BARK MULCH IS RECOMMENDED. 5. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED AS NECESSARY. SOIL AMENDMENT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS. ROCK5 LARGER THAN ONE INCH DIAMETER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. SOIL AMENDMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN TYPICAL NATIVE PLANT LANDSCAPE AREAS. G. PLANTING 11OLE5 SHALL GENERALLY BE 2x - 3x THE 51ZE OF THE ROOT BALL. THE WALLS AND BASES OF PLANT HOLES SHALL BE SCARIFIED. HOLES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 5% ORGANIC COMPOST t 95% EXISTING SOIL. PLANTING HOLES OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD BE INOCULATED WITH MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI, PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. 7. TREE5 SHALL BE STAKED WITH TWO PRESSURE TREATED 2" DIA. POLES. TREE TRUNK SHALL BE SECURED WITH TWO RUBBER TIES OR STRAPS FORMING A FIGURE -EIGHT BETWEEN TRUNK AND STAKE. 8. RESIDUAL WEED PRE -EMERGENT SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS NECESSARY. APPLICATION SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS, 9. LAWN SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 25%. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE PLAN SNOT E r CD N r M�rNN U *-.WMM - CM W c-, �— p U M M � p U O O _ '•' N ui u� N > '0CD c0 GO f0 L co co ui E co N a� Y O �p,NDSCgp�, \TF 7oF3 A 9���/ Q z LU � U� J zu� LLJ LLJ 0 0 - z cf)J � LU CE w z < W O z_ U) J J D m r Ln OCTOBER 2, 2017 TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO: E SCALE: 1 /8'' = 1'-011 Item No. 9c Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 21 Park Road City of Burlingame Design Review and Condominium Permit Address: 21 Park Road Item No. 9c Design Review Study Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Request: Application for Design Review and Condominium Permit for a new three-story, seven -unit residential condominium building. Applicant: Levy Design Partners APN: 026-233-130 Property Owner: GGH Investment LLC Lot Area: 8,800 SF General Plan: Medium High Density Residential Zoning: BMU Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (Bayswater Mixed Use District) Adjacent Development: Multi -family and single-family dwellings, offices, commercial Current Use: Single family dwelling and detached garage Proposed Use: Seven -unit residential condominium building Allowable Use: Multi -family dwellings, services, offices, civic/cultural History: In 2013 and 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed an application for a new, three-story, eight -unit residential condominium building proposed by a different property owner and architect. Issues raised by the commissioners and neighbors at that time included side setbacks, design of side elevations, sun access and shading, and quantity of parking provided. Since that time, the property was sold to the current owner and the applicant was withdrawn. The current property owner engaged Levy Design Partners to design the currently proposed seven -unit residential condominium. Since the previous application was withdrawn and the proposed project is substantially different in design and configuration, it is considered to be a new application. Project Summary: The applicant is proposing a new, three-story, seven -unit residential condominium building with enclosed at -grade parking garages at 21 Park Road, zoned BMU. Multifamily residential uses, with an average maximum unit size of 1,250 SF, are permitted in the BMU District (1,239 SF average unit size proposed). The project site currently contains a single family dwelling and a large detached garage. These would be demolished to build the proposed seven -unit residential condominium building. The existing buildings were not identified on the Draft Inventory of Historic Resources of the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan. The site is bordered by a three-story multifamily building to the north, a one-story office building to the south, two-story office buildings across Park Road to the east, and three-story multifamily buildings across El Camino Real to the west. It is a "through lot" with frontages on both Park Road and El Camino Real. For the proposed project, the Park Road frontage is considered the front of the lot. The subject property is zoned BMU and has a General Plan land use designation of Medium -High Density residential with 21-50 dwelling units per acre, which allows up to 10 units. The application is for seven units which is a density of 35 dwelling units per acre. The proposed building would contain seven residential units in two floors above enclosed at -grade parking garages for each unit. Each of the units will contain an entry, living and dining areas, kitchen, two bedrooms, bathrooms and a space for a washer/dryer. The average unit size proposed is 1,239 SF (1,250 SF average maximum unit size permitted). Bicycle racks are provided in each of the garages. A trash enclosure is provided towards the rear of the lot. Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road During preliminary review Planning staff identified the following applications required for this project: ■ Design Review for the proposed construction of a new three-story, seven -unit residential condominium building (C.S. 25.35.045 and 25.57.010, and Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan); and ■ Condominium Permit for construction of new residential condominium building (C.S. 26.30.020). Design Review: The proposed project is subject to Chapter 5 of the Downtown Specific Plan (Design & Character). Section 5.3 (pages 5-17 through 5-21) provides design guidelines specifically for residential projects within the Downtown Specific Plan area. Section 5.4 (pages 5-22 through 5-27) provides more general design guidelines that apply to all areas of the downtown, including residential and mixed use areas. The relevant pages of the plan have been included as an attachment for convenience of commissioners. Materials proposed for the exterior of the building include a combination of cement plaster, lap siding, fiber cement panels, and metal panel awnings. Composite wood windows, painted wood entry doors, and metal sectional garage doors would be used throughout the building. The overall height of the building is proposed at 35-0" above average top of curb level where 55'-0" is the maximum allowed (Conditional Use Permit required if building height exceeds 35-0"). On sheet A3.0, two visual simulations are provided looking north and south along Park Road. Off -Street Parking: Required off-street parking is based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. For this project, Code Section 25.70.032 (b) requires that a total of 11 parking spaces be provided for the residents of the units (1.5 spaces for each two -bedroom unit). There is no guest parking required on -site for properties located within the Downtown Specific Plan. Each unit contains a private enclosed garage and is fitted with a car stacker to allow two vehicles to be parked in each garage, so that a total of 14 spaces are provided on -site. Access to the garages would be from Park Road. There would be no vehicle access from El Camino Real. As noted above, each garage will contain a car stacker. The car stacker system to be installed is a Klaus SingleVario 2061 (see attached specifications) and is able to accommodate passenger cars and medium size vans and SUVs. The Municipal Code does not include specifications for parking lift systems, so the City currently does not have a standard mechanism for review and approval. However, as a policy the Downtown Specific Plan encourages "creative approaches" to providing on -site parking including car stackers. The car stackers could be considered "creative approaches" to providing the required on -site parking, and therefore be consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan. To date, the City has approved several commercial and residential projects with parking lift systems. The code requires that the condominium development provide an area for deliveries. The code does not specify that it be a dedicated parking space, only that it be "an area for on -site deliveries." The project proposes a loading/delivery space located adjacent to the trash enclosure area that could be used for short- term delivery or service vehicle parking. Common and Private Open Space: There is a total of 1,160 SF (165.7 SF/unit) of common open space proposed for the condominium project where 700 SF (100 SF/unit) is required. The common open space is provided at the rear of the lot (along El Camino Real). Of the required common open space, a minimum of 50% must be in soft landscaping (350 SF); 952 SF of the provided common open space is proposed to be landscaped and therefore is in compliance. There is 76 SF to 85 SF in private open space per unit (75 SF/unit is the minimum required) provided in balconies. 2 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road Landscaping: Proposed landscaping throughout the site is shown on the Landscape Plan (sheet L1.1). The applicant is proposing 60% (300 SF) landscaping within the required front setback where 10% (50 SF) is the minimum required. The project meets all other zoning code and condominium permit requirements. Existing landscaping consists of hedges along the sides of the property and a large shrub at the front. The applicant is proposing to replace all of the existing landscaping with new landscaping, which includes four, 36- inch box threes, shrubs, and small decorative plants throughout the site. In accordance with the City's requirements, each lot developed with a multifamily residential use is required to provide a minimum of one 24-inch box -size minimum non -fruit trees for every 2000 SF of lot coverage. Based on the proposed project, a total of three landscape trees are required on site. The City Arborist has required that a 24-inch box landscape tree (London Plane) be added to the planter strip on Park Road. There will be a total of four, 36-inch box trees on site, as well as a street tree in the Park Road planter strip, for a total of four new trees. There are two existing 60-inch Eucalyptus trees within the El Camino Real right of way, adjacent to the property. Both trees would be retained. Affordable (Below -Market Rate) Units: The City's previous Inclusionary Housing Ordinance has been replaced by a Density Bonus Ordinance consistent with State Law. The Density Bonus Ordinance is discretionary, and projects are not obligated to provide affordable units unless they seek to utilize development standard incentives offered by the ordinance. The applicant has not chosen to apply any of the development standard incentives offered by the Density Bonus Ordinance and therefore is not providing any affordable units as part of the project. This space intentionally left blank. 3 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road Lot Area: 8,800 SF 21 Park Road Plans date stamped: July 11, 2017 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front (Park Rd) (1st fir): (2"d fir): 10'-0" (all floors) 10'-0" (3rd fir): ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Left Side (1st fir): 5-0" no minimum required (2"d fir): 6'-011 ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ Right Side (1st fir): 14'-6" 5'-0" (2"d fir): 7'-1" to wing wall/8'-4" to building 6'-0" (3rd fir): ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7'-1" to wing wall/8'-4" to building 7'-011 Rear (El Camino) (11t fir): 20'-0" 20'-0" (2"d fir): 20'-0" 20'-0" (3rd fir): ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ 21'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 5,066 SF 6,644 SF ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ 57.1 % 75% Building Height: 35'-0" 55-0" maximum/ ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ CUP required to exceed 35-0" Front Setback 60% 10% Landscaping: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ 300 SF 50 SF Private Open Space: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 SF — 85 SF/unit 75 SF per unit Common Open Space: 1,160 SF 700 SF SF Landscaped: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................................ 952 SF (100% of required) 350 SF (50% of required) Off -Street Parking: 14 spaces for residents 7, 2 bdrm units x 1.5 = 11 spaces (provided in car stackers) Area for on -site deliveries near trash Area for on -site deliveries enclosure required 100% covered 80% must be covered Driveway Width: 12'-0" 12'-0" for less than 30 vehicles R-3 side setback standards (Section 25.28.075) shall apply to property line(s) with an existing residential use on the abutting property. In this case, the R-3 side setback standards apply along the right side property line since an existing multifamily residential use abuts this property line. In addition, the minimum side setback for condominium developments shall be five (5) feet (Code Section 25.28.075 (d)). In addition, the minimum side setback for a structure shall be increased by one foot for each story above the first story (Code Section 25.28.075 (e). 0 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road General Plan/Specific Plan: The Burlingame General Plan designates this site for Medium -High Density residential (21-50 dwelling units per acre), which allows up to 10 units. In 2010 the City Council adopted the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan (amended in 2011), which serves as an element of the General Plan. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the planning area for the Downtown Specific Plan, specifically in the Bayswater Mixed Use Area. The Plan describes the Bayswater Mixed Use Area as follows: The Bayswater Mixed Use area is centered on Bayswater Avenue between El Camino Real and Park Road. Development will be consistent with the existing neighborhood scale of small streets and varied commercial and residential buildings. Existing residential and commercial properties could be improved and expanded at a scale consistent with the adjacent residential areas. The area is meant to serve as a buffer between the downtown commercial district and the residential neighborhoods to the south and east across El Camino Real. For properties with El Camino Real frontage, new development is strongly encouraged to provide egress from side streets rather than El Camino Real, thereby reducing curb cuts and allowing existing trees to remain and new trees to be planted on El Camino Real. The Downtown Specific Plan includes various Goals and Policies to guide growth and development in Downtown Burlingame. The table below shows how the proposed project meets these Goals and Policies. GOAL/POLICY PROJECT PROPOSED Goal LU-3: Ensure sensitive transitions between The proposed three-story, seven -unit multifamily the existing adjacent residential areas and the residential development provides a compatible and downtown area. sensitive transition between existing two and three- story residential and commercial buildings in the surrounding neighborhood. Policy LU-3.1: In peripheral areas of the downtown The project site is located on the periphery of the planning area, identify neighborhood serving uses downtown planning area and proposes a residential such as corner markets and provide for sufficient density of 35 units per acre which is consistent with residential density to support those uses. the allowed Medium -High Density designation (21-50 dwelling units per acre). Policy LU-6.1: Allow housing in the Howard The proposed project includes a seven -unit Avenue area as well as on the periphery. multifamily residential development on the periphery of the downtown planning area. Goal P-1: Explore creative parking solutions. Car stackers are proposed in each of the enclosed garages, accommodating two vehicles instead of one. Policy P-1.1 Conceal parking areas through the Ground level parking is concealed by designed the use of attractively designed above- or below -ground garages so that they are enclosed, are located behind parking structures. the front wall of the building, and configured so that the doors face the side property line. Policy C-2.6: Consider the needs of pedestrian, Bicycle racks are provided in each enclosed garage. bicycles, and people with disabilities. Policy S-1.3: Streetscapes should reflect One new 24-inch box size street tree will be planted in Burlingame's destination as a "tree city." Trees front of the site. should be planted throughout the downtown as an integral part of the streetscape, and mature streets trees should be persevered whenever possible. 5 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road GOAL/POLICY PROJECT PROPOSED Policy D-3.1: Ensure that new development is Building does not exceed the maximum allowed appropriate to Burlingame with respect to size and building height and is consistent in mass and bulk design. with existing buildings in the area; project is subject to design review. Staff Comments: None. Environmental Review Status: The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15332, In -Fill Development Projects, which consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions described below. (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. ■ The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Medium -High Density residential (21-50 dwelling units per acre), which allows up to 10 units, and is located within the Bayswater Mixed Use Area of the Downtown Specific Plan. The proposed project consists of a multifamily residential condominium with seven units, which is a density of 35 dwelling units per acre, and therefore consistent with the general plan designation. The project as designed is consistent with Goals LU-3 and P-1 which address sensitive transitions between existing residential areas and the downtown area and creative parking solutions. The proposed project is also consistent with Policies LU-3.1, LU-6.1, P-1.3, C-2.6, S-1.3, and D-3.1 which address residential density, allowing housing on the periphery of the downtown planning area, parking design, encouraging planting of trees, and ensuring that the massing of the building is appropriate. Furthermore, the proposed project complies with all applicable zoning regulations, including setbacks, building height, lot coverage, landscaping, off-street parking, and condominium development regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. ■ The proposed development is on a project site of 0.20 acres and is surrounded by urban uses, including a three-story multifamily building to the north, a one-story office building to the south, two-story office and commercial buildings across Park Road to the east, and three-story multifamily buildings across El Camino Real to the west. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. ■ The project site is located in an urban area and is surrounded by commercial and residential development. The project site is completely developed and is currently occupied with a one-story building, a detached garage, and paved parking area. There are no large or significant trees, riparian habitat or other sensitive plant communities on the project site. There are no creeks or wetlands present on the project site. '-9 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Downtown Specific Plan, which analyzed potential impacts of new infill development and included standard conditions of approval to mitigate potential environmental impacts from projects. The proposed project is located within the Downtown Specific Plan and conforms with development assumptions incorporated into the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Specific Plan. With incorporation of these standard conditions of approval, the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Traffic: Based on the ITE's Trip Generation 9th Edition, daily trip generation rates of 9.57 trips/units for single family homes and 5.81 trips/unit for residential condominiums, the proposed project would result in 31 net new daily vehicle trips. The proposed project would generate approximately three AM peak hour trips and four PM peak hour trips. The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires a traffic impact analysis when a project would result in 100 or more peak hour trips. Since the project would generate approximately three AM and four PM peak hour trips, a detailed traffic impact analysis to show conformity to the CMP is not required. The project would not result in a conflict with any other adopted plan, ordinance, or policy related to the effectiveness of the circulation system. Additionally, the traffic impacts from the full implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan, which includes the proposed development on the project site, were evaluated when the Downtown Plan was approved in 2010. The full build -out of the Downtown Specific Plan would add substantially to delays at three study area intersections located at California Drive/Lorton Avenue, El Camino Real/Peninsula Avenue/Park Road, and California Drive/Howard Avenue. As identified in the Downtown Specific Plan Initial Study, Mitigation Measures F-1 through F-3 would reduce the delays at these intersections to less -than -significant levels by year 2030. Since the proposed project is only contributing six net new units on the site and three AM peak hour trips and four PM peak hour trips, traffic impacts as a result of the project would be less than significant. Noise: The project site has been developed with structure for 102 years. Since the use of the site will continue to be residential, the proposed project will not significantly increase the existing ambient noise levels. The proposed project will be required to comply with current construction standards, including increased insulation, which also provides for noise attenuation. Because the proposed project is a multifamily residential land use, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations will require a qualified acoustical engineer to prepare a design level acoustical study as a prerequisite to building permit issuance for any future multifamily residential development applications where noise levels could exceed 65 decibels. The study shall include post - construction monitoring to ensure that interior ambient noise levels for multifamily housing are at or below 45 dBA. Construction of the proposed condominium will not require pile driving or other significant vibration causing construction activity. The project does not include any permanent operational activity that would result in excessive or perceptible vibration. Conditions of approval to be added will ensure that temporary construction noise impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels. Air quality: The proposed application is for a seven -unit multifamily condominium project to replace the existing single family dwelling. While this project will accommodate more people than the previous use, the change in emissions generated by a change from a single family dwelling to seven residential dwelling units at this location over emissions from all development in Burlingame 7 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road is insignificant. The site is within walking distance of countywide bus and rail services. The site is zoned for multifamily residential development and with proper adherence to regional air quality requirements during construction, the proposed project will not create any deterioration in the air quality or climate, locally or regionally. Water quality: This project is a residential infill development project and it is not located adjacent to a waterway. Currently, the majority of the site is impervious, consisting of two separate structures and paving throughout the site. The proposed project will included new landscaping at the front and rear of the site and will match the existing area of landscaping being removed (approximately 1,550 SF). Development of the proposed project would require compliance with the City of Burlingame Municipal Code which requires that all storm drain systems shall be designed to remove stormwater from the area at a maximum rainfall intensity of 1 inch per hour and that lots shall be graded to provide stormwater removal at this rainfall rate. A grading permit would be required and runoff from the project site would be evaluated for its potential to cause erosion. Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, will need to comply with the city's stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. A condition of approval will be included which requires that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices during all phases of construction, including demolition. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. ■ The project site is located in an urban area and is surrounded by commercial and residential development which is served by utility and public services. The existing one-story building will be replaced with a three-story building on the same lot and therefore can be adequately served by required utility and public services. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should comment on the design of the project as required by Chapter 25.57 of the Zoning Ordinance, Design Review, and to the following design criteria for mixed use districts is detailed in Code Section 25.57.030 (g): (1) Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles that characterize the city's commercial, industrial and mixed use areas; and (2) Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages; and (3) On visually prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fits the site and is compatible with the surrounding development; and (4) Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; and (5) Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or significant original architectural features, and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structures in the immediate area; and 9:3 Design Review and Condominium Permit 21 Park Road (6) Provision of site features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation that enriches the existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Brian Siu Yang, Levy Design Partners, applicant and architect GGH Investment LLC property owners Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Materials Board Klaus SingleVario 2061 Specifications Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 13, 2017 Aerial Photo �9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 02-9 - 233 - 13'v ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other: B100 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2I �Af-IL ryog-p APPLICANT Name: SE-Er{�TGc ��b�SiGn76t2 Address City/State/Zip: Phone: E-mail: ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: LEVY DESIGN �n�T�nzs Address: 90 S oCvr& City/State/Zip: SAN Ej+- r CASCO, C.A Phone: 4l5 - 1 7-7 - O 3;-(Q I E-mail:To3Y 0 LrcVYDrc516r-jMf7 vets -'"A Burlingame Business License #: Z g 3 11 PROPERTY OWNER Name: G G Ff !N ve&'IF i tavT L L C- Address: I10 F-OgLC-f-, AVe City/State/Zip: CA 614010 Phone: S1 0 1 E-mail: &W.FL-L- I'i99 YA-l400:LV M RECEIVED SEP 3 0 2016 CITY OF BURUNGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grant the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part of the Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. TS tJ (Initials of Architect/Designer) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEyAputtl%OrQ QF- 2 5QwvtNG4 (Alwct,E ram: k F::jS`D'+-1C/e NC- J CCVQS-. VrTtow o(- SC-Vv-N 3 ^��' ! TOWNtE.7Hnc�S• AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1n Applicant's signature:�Y Date: 01 I Z `I 1t4 I /p I am aware of the proposed application hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. j Property owner's signature: �i� - ' Date: l I Date submitted: �i-30-Zol fo 5: I HANDO U T51 PC Application. doc 1'!1 0. - i 4�r' ik mais, ol` P-NOMFEW" AP AT mp P1,48M AN jjff:jo _IATD PARTNERS INC • rqq Page 1 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Car data Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approach oatl plan Installation Pare 4 Electrical Installation Technical data Page 5 To be pertor- med by the customer Description SingieVario 2061 oFree space 501 520 for vehicle up to 5.00 m = 16'4" for (540 for vehicle up to 5.20 on 17' long) }45♦ Before lowering the platform, the vehicle parked in the tower parking space must be driven off! 1~80-T501 Free space } 451 Free spac< Groundin • Steel pillar base4' 520 for vehicle up to 5.00 on =16'4" long 111 (540 for vehicle up to 5.20 m 17' long) 111 Garage with door in front of the car parking system Notes • For dividing walls: cutting through 10 x 10 cm (for pipes). • Dimensions Al, A2 and A3 must be coordinated with the door supplier. • If the total height is greater, the max. vehicle height for the upper parking space increases accordingly. • Potential equalization from foundation grounding connection to system (provided by the customer). • In compliance with DIN EN 14010, 30 cm wide yellow -black markings compliant to ISO 3864 must be applied by the customer to the edge of the platform in the access area to mark the danger zone in front of the supporting surface of the upper platform edge (see nLoad Plane, Page 3) • Variable steel pillar bases in two sizes (see nLoad Plana, Page 3). to Maximum load of 2,500 kg for extra charge. Product D< SingleVari 2061 Dimensions: All space requirements are minimum finished dimensions. Tolerances for space requirements .3. Dimensions in cm. EB (single platform) = 2 vehicles I. .I 320 160 MIR t 330 170 I. :t 340 180 I I 350 190 971TWINS 360 200 I. I 370 210 =stzrdaNlype TM=mnout car Suitable for: Standard passenger car, station wagon/Van/SIN. Height accord ng t lengthMccm according [o con[ur. ©Cmiiii' },m I. .I 320 150 150 1. I 330 150 160 I. :I 340 150 170 I. •t 350 150 180 I. II 360 150 190 I, I 370 150 200 = tandamtvpe 190 cm max. 2000/2500 kg max. 500/625 kg Standard passenger Car 6o G 1 145 It s• 95 500 (52U) 12S Standard station wagon/Van/SW 160 30 00 12s 1. sao 020) Standard passenger cars are vehicles without any sports options such as spoilers, low -profile tyres etc. multiparking Klaus Multiparldng 6mbil Hermann-Krum-StraBe 2 D-88319 Aitmch Phone +49-7565-508-0 Fax +49-7565-508-88 E-Mail Irlf a0multiparking.com Internet "vemuttiparking.com Single Vario 2061 [Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 2 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Cantata Page 2 Widm Imesions Page 3 Approach Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical Jala Page 5 To be penor coed by the customer Description 1 . . Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) EB EB i EB '. EB i EB i EB 61 BS BS + Carriageway in accordancrege with usable platform width.. Br usable platform width ,,t usable platform width , B1 local ulations 230* 260 230* 520 ,0 230* 78D 240 280 240 ` 5 0 240 8`40 260 280 260 r 580� 260J 8700 270 270 `00 270 J 8�0 2I0 300 300 270 600 ,. Z]0 _ — 980 Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x EB) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) Mxo xo >io E~^ E.. BE oEB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EBJI E °IIv B2 N B3 umin. 20 Bz B3 min. 20 B2 M B3min.2 usable platform width, `2 , _. B3_ , 230* 265 2500 240 2265 260 250 2755 22700 260 285 ,5 280� 270 265 2900 usable platform width, _ B2 3 230* „ 515 510 240 53555 55300 250 55555 5550 260 5_775 570 270 5955 , 5900 usable platform width B22 , B3 j 240 8055 8000 250 8355 88 00 260 8�J5 860 270 865 88900 Single Platform (EB) Double arrangement (2 x ED) Tripple arrangement (3 x EB) EB i EB i 1 B4 ll Bs min. 20 usable platform width By B5J 230* 2500 2400 240 260 22500 250 270 260 260 r 28800 i_270 , 270 290 280 E8 EB EB EB I B4 B5 �min.20 usable platform width Bg� Its 230* 810 5000 240 �53�520� 250 5500 5400 260 570 560 270 590 580 EB i EB i EB i EB i ES i EB i B4 Bs umin. 20 Carriageway in accordance with usable platform width B4 1 B5 local regulations 230* 7,70 760 240 800 790 250 830 8200 260 L 860 EQ 270 8�90 860 t, A3 = seat -engaging surface (dimensions require coordination with doorsupplier.) EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB EB Almond door a dimensions require coordination between a an L DF L L DF SDF S localagency and L DF L L DF S DF S Klaus Multipa..... Carriageway accordance with usable platform width door entrance width OF u u losable platform width door entrance width DF `L S local regulations 240• 230 1L �s `55 240' _ _ 475 20 855 250 250 1�2 ,s 0 240 , 520 B0 40 260 _ 260 155 30 260 520• 20 u0 270 _ 270 c 35 300 270 5400 20 u 270 270 �JS � 30._, 270 5600 `�0 c 40� * = standard width (parking space width 2.30 m) • = no standard width for doors! AEnd parking spaces are generally more difficult to drive into. Therefore we recommended far end parking spaces our wider platforms. Parking on standard width platforms with larger vehicles may make getting into and out of the vehicle difficult. This depends on type of vehicle, approach and above all on the individual drivers skill. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 3 of 5 Page I Section Dimensions Cardata Page 2 Width dimesions Page 3 Approxh Load plan Installation Page 4 Electrical installation Technical data Page 5 To be'no' coed by the mstomer Desaiplion maximum maximum descending ascending slope 4 % slope 14 % AThe illustrated maximum approach angles must not be exceeded. Incorrect approach angles will cause serious maneouvring & positioning problems on the parking system for which the local agency of Klaus accepts no responsibility. Load plan Option 1: short steel pillar base ` platformload i Fa i F n2 3 ,�F F5 F6 2,000 kg 30 u..1 7`4 0.55 7.7 `ll 2,500 kg `J5 1`..33 8`..99 0`.66 9`3 x3 Forces in kN Option 2: long steel pillar base AThe steel pillar base can be selected optionally (short or long). Please make sure to note the corresponding forces that apply! Units are dowelled to the floor. Drilling depth: approx. 15 cm. Floor and walls are to be made of concrete (quality minimum C20/25)! Free space for longitudinal and vertical ducts (e.g. ventilation) Bl'o Bl'" Bi'25 1265) R6z53 (2625) 35 10} 35 35 10 20 Bi, B2 = (see table on page 2) ®Free space for vertical pipelines, ventilation branch canals for horizontal • Size 15 cm is reduced to 5 cm for type 2061.160 Free space only applicable if vehicle is parked forwards = FRONT FIRST and driver's door on the left side. ( ) = Dimensions in brackets illustrate an example for usable platform width 230 cm. Example for ventilation branch canal and/or vertical pipelines. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890-0021 Version 09.2009 Page 4 of 5 Page 1 Section Dimensions Cardona Page 2 Widlh dimesions Page 3 Approach Load plan installation Page 4 Electrical Installation Technical data — Page 5 To be pertm- med by the customer Description Installation diagram Electrical data (to be performed by the customer) I y 14 to the next system Conduit EN 25 - (M25) height: +1.70 in Conduit EN 25 (M25) height: + 1.10 m S Generally, this parking system is not suited for short -time Tankers (temporary parkers). Please do not hesitate to contact your local KLAUS agency for further assistance. Low -noise power units mounted to rubber -bonded -to metal mountings are installed. Nevertheless we recommend that parking system's garage be built separately from the dwelling. - wall recess plans - maintenance offer/contract - declaration of conformity - test sheet on airborne and slid -borne sound See separate sheet regarding corrosion protection. If there are traffic routes next to or behind the installations, railings compliant to DIN EN ISO 13857 must be installed by the customer. Railings must also be in place during construction. Environmental conditions for the area of multiparking systems: Temperature range -10 to+40° C. Relative humidity 50 % at a maximum outside temperature of +40° C. If lifting or lowering times are specified, they refer to an environmental temperature of+10' C and with the system set up directly next to the hydraulic unit. At lower temperatures or with longer hydraulic lines, these times increase. Noo. Qu, nattly Description Poshlon Frequency 1 1 Electricity meter — u in the supply line 2 1 Main fuse: 3xfuse 16A(stow) in the supply Iper unit orcircuit breaker3x 16A line (nigger characteristic K or Q 3 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 mm' to main switch Iper unit (3 PH. N+PE) with markedwire u u and protective conductor 4 1 Lockable main switch defined at the Iper unit u`J plan evaluation r 5 1 Supply line 5 x 2.5 tom' from main Iper unit (3 H+N+PE)withmarkedwire switch to unit and protective conductor 6 every Foundation earth connector corner pit _ri lore J, floor J 7 1 Equipotential banding in accordance Iper with DIN EN 60204 from foundation system -- earth connector to the system _I 11o.l Description 8 Terminalbox 9�. Control line 3 x 0.75 mm'(PH +N+PE) 100 Control line 7 x 1.5mm'with marked wire and protective conductor r 11 Operating device 122 Control line 5x 1.5mm'with marked wire and protective conductor__) L 13 r 1 Hydraulic unit 3.0 kW. three-phase current, 400 V 150 Hz 2L4 Control line 5x 1.5mm' with marked wire and protective conductor 15 C�contml According to DIN 4109 (Sound insulation in buildings), para. 4, annotation4, Klaus Multiparkers are part of the building services (garage systems). Normal sound insulation: DIN 4109, para. 4, Sound insulation against noises from building services. Table 4 in para. 4.1 contains the permissible sound level values emitted from building services for personal living and working areas. According to line 2 the maximum sound level in personal living and working areas must not exceed 30 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: - Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) - Minimum sound insulation of building R'w= 57 dB (to be provided by customer) Increased sound Insulation (special agreement): DIN 4109, Amendment 2, Information on planning and execution, proposals for increased sound insulation. Agreement: Maximum sound level in personal living and working areas 25 dB (A). Noises created by users are not subject to the requirements (see table 4, DIN 4109). The following measures are to be taken to comply with this value: - Sound protection package according to offer/order (Klaus Multiparking GmbH) - Minimum sound insulation of building R'w, = 62 dB (to be provided by customer) Note: User noises are noises created by individual users in our Multiparking systems. These can be noises from accessing the platforms, slamming of vehicle doors, motor and brake noises. SingleVario 20611 Code number 584.69.890.0021 Version 09.2009 Page 1 section Dimensions - - Cardata Any constraints that may be necessary according to DIN EN ISO 13857 in order to provide protection, for pathways directly in front, next to Paget or behind the unit. This is also valid during construction. width - Consecutive numbering of parking spaces. Page 3 Pp'. Lighting, ventilation, fire extinguishing and fire alarm systems. Dad plan Installation ' According to DIN EN 14 010, a warning that identifies this danger Page area must be placed in the entrance area that conforms to ISO 3864. Electrical This must be done accord 1ng to EN 92/58/EW6 for systems without installation a pit 10 cm from the edge of the platform. Technical data Pages Any necessary wall cuttings according to page 1. To be pedoo- med by the customer Suitable electrical supply to the main switch and the control wire line Description must be provided by the customer during installation. The functionality can be monitored on site by our fitters together with the electrician. If this cannot be done during installation for some reason for which the customer is responsible, the customer must commission an electrician at their own expense and risk. In accordance with DIN EN 60204 (Safety of Machinery. Electrical Equipment), grounding of the steel structure is necessary, provided by the customer (distance between grounding max. 10 m). Multiparking system providing dependent parking spaces for 2 cars one on top of the other each. The lower vehicle parks directly on the Floor plate. The vehicle parked on the bottom must be driven out before lowering the platform. The height of the platform can be adjusted Flexibly (even subsequently). Adjustment of maximum load of 2,500 kg can be made subsequently. Dimensions are in accordance with the underlying dimensions of parking pit, height and width The parking bays are accessed horinzotatty (installation deviation a 1 Vehicles are positioned on the upper parking space using wheel stops on the right side (adjust according to operating instructions). Operation via operating device with hold -to -run -device using masterkeys. The operating elements are usually mounted either in front of the column or on the outside of the door frame Operating instructions are attached to each operator's stand. For garages with doors at the front of the parking system the special dimensional requirements have to be taken into account. - 2 steel pillars with bases that are mounted on the Floor (short or long steel pillar bases can be selected optionally). - 2 sliding platforms (mounted to the steel pillars with sliding bearings) - 1 platform - 1 mechanic synchronization control system (to ensure synchronous operation of the hydraulic cylinders while lowering and lifting the platform) - 1 hydraulic cylinder - 1 automatic hydraulic safety valve (prevents accidental lowering of the platform while accessing the platform) - Dowels, screws, connecting elements, bolts, etc. - The platforms and parking spaces are end -to -end accessible for parking! Page 5 of 5 Cable conduits and recesses for operating device (for double wing doors: please contact the local agency of Klaus Multiparking). Operating device exposed Operating device concealed 110 above 120 above n carriageway carriageway level o level N Conduit EN25(M25) H If the foilowingare not included in the quotation, they will also have to be provided / paid for by the customer: - Mounting of contactor and terminal box to the wall valve, complete wiring of all elements in accordance with the circuit diagram - Costs for final technical approval by an authorized body - Main switch - Control line from main switch to hydraulic unit - Platform base sections - Adjustable wheel stops - Canted access plates - Side members - Cross members - Screws, nuts, washers, distance tubes, etc. - Hydraulic cylinder - Solenoid valve - Safety valve - Hydraulic conduits - Screwed joints - High-pressure hoses - Installation material - Operating device (Emergency Stop, lock 1 master key per parkingspace) - Terminal box at wall valve - Electrical locking device - Chain control - Hydraulic power unit (low -noise, installed onto a console with a mbber-bonded-to-metal mounting) - Hydraulic oil reservoir - Oil filling - Internal geared wheel pump - Pump holder - Clutch - 3-phase-AC-motor (3.0 kW, 230/400 V, 50 Hz) - Contactor (with thermal overcurrent relay and control fuse) - Test manometer - Pressure relief valve - Hydraulic hoses (which reduce noise transmission onto the hydraulic pipe The Klaus company reserves the right in the course of technical progress to use newer or other technologies, systems, processes, procedures or standards in the fulfillment of their obligations other than those originally offered provided the customer derives no disadvantage from their so doing. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD -a BURLINGAME, CA94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 0 FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 21 PARK ROAD The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the fallowing public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Environmental 5coping, Design Review, and Condominium Permit for a new 3-story, Tunit residential condominium building at 21 PARK ROAD zoned BMU. APN 029-223-130 Mailed: October 13, 2017 (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE �s ,� �+- M��� �* 76 .. .� -,��, cr. -.00 �,-_ WI -I I I iei I ON-00 I - A 4 0 �- Irk~ e - kv t + � _ f ma's fi,r��r , Y� {� � • � ' - _ . � •_- i L. it � �.�.�� ��1.. � � _ •^ — — lop "'.ie ■ - -yi - ter: r — y ' 4" s 16 ' tip. +' tL 1V 0 ).A_} i � � -�� 'tea T - � ""•� ' F ir ipb OF i� MF. JL K, t "� 1 LIN all GENERAL NOTES II 1. *E = EGRESS WINDOW OR DOOR (MIN. ONE PER SLEEPING ROOM) R r3 NIL R WEST ELEVATION (FRONT AT PARK STREET) 118"=11-0'1 R OIL ROOF (HIGH POINT) _IF 73.25' T.O. PLYWD. ....................... ROOF ...................... .. 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. o LAP SIDING (WIDTHS VARY); COLOR 2 METAL PANEL AWNING OIL THIRD FLOOR ......................... 62.75' T.O. PLYWD. FIBER CEMENT PANEL; I COLOR 2 0 o CEMENT PLASTER; Un COLOR 1 OIL SECOND FLOOR ......................... 52.50' T.O. PLYWD. 2X WOOD GUARDRAIL COLUMN CLAD W/ METAL PANEL MAILBOXES METAL PANEL OILGROUN FLR. UNIT 7 ` ...... ....39..25'..T..O..CURB ....... ..................... 38.25' T.O. CURB CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 SOUTH ELEVATION (SIDE) 118"=1'-0" riffalIIETA MQhd�/.111ATd\&71J11 'IV ISTAITW T.111hdo1 ROOF (HIGH POINT 73.25' T.O. PLYWD cDOIL ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD �i LAP SIDING (WIDTHS COLOR 2 OIL THIRD FLOOR 62.75' T.O. PLYWD 6" LAP SIDING; CC CEMENT PLASTER; 0 o I COLOR 3 6" LAP SIDING; CC SECOND FLOOR 52.50' T.O. PLYWD 2X WOOD GUARDR) I C14 CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 OIL GROUND FLR (UNIT 40.25' T.O. CONC. PARK ROAD 38.25' T.O. CURB NORTH ELEVATION (SIDE) 118"=11-0'1 R OILROOF HIGH POINT 73.25' T.O. PLYWD. .................... ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. 0 METAL PANEL AWNING I OL THIRD FLOOR ...................... 62.75' T.O. PLYWD. FIBER CEMENT PANEL; COLOR 2 I 0 6 I OL SECOND FLOOR .................... 52.50' T.O. PLYWD. CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 COLUMN CLAD `V W/ METAL PANEL 6' TALL WOOD FENCE h GROUND FLR (UNITS 1-4) 40.25' T.O. CONC. ............................................. 4\ PARK ROAD 2 EAST ELEVATION (REAR AT EL CAMINO REAL) 118 "=11-011 V LIYI LIYI I LI"1J1 LI\, COLOR 2 — COMPOSITE WOOD WINDOWS WITH METAL ....TRIM,. TYP. TFiROIJGFiOIJT. FIBER CEMENT PANEL; COLOR 1 LAP SIDING (WIDTHS VARY); COLOR 2 .............................................. 6" LAP SIDING; COLOR 3 CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 6' TALL WOOD FENCE COMPOSITE WOOD WINDOWS WITH METAL TRIM, TYP. THROUGHOUT CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 METAL PANEL AWNING LAP SIDING (WIDTHS VARY); COLOR 2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL; COLOR 2 6" LAP SIDING; COLOR 3 2X WOOD GUARDRAIL ............................... CEMENT PLASTER; COLOR 1 COLUMN CLAD W/ METAL PANEL ........................................... IC GROUND FLR. (UNITS 1-4) 40.25' T.O. CURB ............................................PA ... NTED.......WOO....D .................... UNIT ENTRY DOOR 7 �•J L61 Y X = CLR. OPENING HEIGHT (MIN. 24") Y = CLR. OPENING WIDTH (MIN. 20") x MIN. TOTAL OPENING TO BE 5.7 S.F. * Z = SILL HEIGHT (MAX. 44" A.F.F.) ,. ............... T.O...FINISH. FLOOR......................... . EXTERIOR FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL ASSEMBLY PER SCHEDULE 2 LAYERS 60—MINUTE GRADE "D" BUILDING PAPER. 0/AWB, LAP MIN. 6" VERTICALLY & 2" HORIZONTALLY HEAD FRAMING, S.S.D. FOR FLASHING AND WATERPROOFING REVS, SEE SHEET A11.5 1/2" MIN. GAP BETWEEN TRIM AND WINDOW ASSEMBLY G.S.M. FLASHING W/ DRIP EDGE SEALANT JOINT, TYP. 12 GAUGE METAL; PAINT TO MATCH WINDOW SEALANT JOINT, TYP. G.S.M. FLASHING AND CAULK WINDOW PER SCHEDULE 2X4 WOOD NAILER GYP. BD. FINISH AT INTERIOR HEAD + 3 I` HEAD DETAIL 311=11-0" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING EXTERIOR FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL ASSEMBLY PER SCHEDULE 2 LAYERS 60—MINUTE GRADE "D" BUILDING PAPER. 0/AWB, LAP MIN. 6" VERTICALLY & 2" HORIZONTALLY FOR FLASHING AND WATERPROOFING REQ'S, SEE SHEET A11.5 JAMB FRAMING, S.S.D. 1 /2" MIN. GAP BETWEEN TRIM AND WINDOW ASSEMBLY OUTSIDE CORNER REGLET; TYP. SEALANT JOINT, TYP. 12 GAUGE METAL; PAINT TO MATCH WINDOW SEALANT JOINT, TYP. WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, BED FINS IN SEALANT 2X4 WOOD NAILER GYP. BD. FINISH AT INTERIOR JAMB JAMB DETAIL 311=11-011 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING SILL DETAIL 3/4" MDF SILL WITH 3/4"X3" MDF APRON, TYP. 2X4 WOOD NAILER WINDOW PER SCHEDULE SEALANT JOINT, TYP. FILLER BLOCKING, PRE —PRIMED AND PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL FINISH. G.S.M. PAN FLASHING W/ DRIP EDGE SET IN CONTINUOUS BEADS OF SEALANT AS SHOWN. EXPOSED FLASHING TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH SURROUNDING FINISH. SEALANT OVER BACKER ROD "J" MOLD SASM SLOPE TOP OF PLATE TO ALLOW FOR 1:12 SILL DRAINAGE SILL FRAMING, S.S.D. FOR FLASHING AND WATERPROOFING REVS, SEE SHEET A11.5 EXTERIOR FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL ASSEMBLY PER SCHEDULE 2 LAYERS 60—MINUTE GRADE "D" BUILDING PAPER. 0/AWB, LAP MIN. 6" VERTICALLY & 2" HORIZONTALLY Z$ UE e L. " � :J w 11: w v NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of Levy Design Partners Inc. and shall not be used except by written agreement with Levy Design Partners Q ARC -� ELF F` �� 0 �_A C-10527 RENEWAL DATE 6-30-19 \�0F CAS-�F/ 21 PARK ROAD APN: 029-223-130 BURLINGAME, CA PROJECT NO. 2016-03 DATE SETISSUE 09-29-2016 PLANNING SUBMISSION �02-10-2016 PLANNING RESPONSE �07-07-2017 PLANNING RESPONSE CONTACT: TOBY LEVY (415) 777-0561 P (415) 777-5117 F SCALE: AS NOTED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A301 311=11-011 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING R OIL ROOF (HIGH POINT) co 73.25' T.O. PLYWD. OIL ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. OILTHIRD FLOOR 62.75' .............................................. T.O. PLYWD. CD i� OIL SECOND FLOOR ................................................... 52.50 T.O. PLYWD. N 0 I 39.75 T.O. CONC. EL CAMINO REAL 39.70' T.O. CURB BUILDING SECTION 1/8"=1'-0" OIL ROOF (HIGH POINT) ................... co 73.25' T.O. PLYWD. ............... OIL ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. 0 I Ot THIRD FLOOR 62.75' T.O. PLYWD. OL SECOND FLOOR 52.50' T.O. PLYWD. STACKER W/ 2-CAR CAPACITY AT EACH UNIT R R 1 II, �■ I I■� ROOF (HIGH POINT) ................. 73.25' T.O. PLYWD. h ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. 0 I I 0 OL THIRD FLOOR 62.75' T.O. PLYWD. A�ISECONID FLOOR 52.50 T.O. PLYWD. a .................. ROOF (HIGH POINT) jj% 73.25 T.O. PLYWD. ROOF 71.75' T.O. PLYWD. .................................... THIRD FLOOR , 62.75' T.O. PLYWD. STACKER W/ 1 2-CAR CAPACITY AT EACH UNIT SECOND FLOOR Ah -1 52.50 T.O. PLYWD. GARAGE UNITS 5-7 39.25' T.O. CONC. I // /, 77 77 77. 38.25' T.O. CURB R R z$ L. w NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of Levy Design Partners Inc. and shall not be used except by written agreement with Levy Design Partners D ARC \ 4 <,0� 0 C-10527 u) RENEWAL DATE Q 6-30-19 \F0F CAS-�F/ 21 PARK ROAD APN: 029-223-130 BURLINGAME, CA PROJECT NO. 2016-03 DATE SETISSUE 09-29-2016 PLANNING SUBMISSION �02-10-2016 PLANNING RESPONSE P-07-2017 PLANNING RESPONSE CONTACT: TOBY LEVY (415) 777-0561 P (415) 777-5117 F scALE: AS NOTED BUILDING SECTIONS BUILDING SECTION 1/8"=1'-0" lJ BUILDING SECTION 1/8"=1'-0" A401 1 SITE PLAN: NEW 118"=1'-0" r N PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH z$ U _ L. w NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of Levy Design Partners Inc. and shall not be used except by written agreement with Levy Design Partners C\4 00 ,�D ARC \ � E L �,q C-10527 RENEWAL DATE Q 6-30-19 \FOF CAS-�F/ 21 PARK ROAD APN: 029-223-130 BURLINGAME, CA PROJECT NO. 2016-03 DATE SETISSUE 09-29-2016 PLANNING SUBMISSION �02-10-2016 PLANNING RESPONSE P-07-2017 PLANNING RESPONSE CONTACT: TOBY LEVY (415) 777-0561 P (415) 777-5117 F SCALE: AS NOTED SITE PLAN: NEW Al 01 IND 3"LAYER (TYP.) SOLID WOOD FENCE 6' HIGH PLANTING NOTES ELSE NOTES COM 301 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND GRADING. 2. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED OF WEEDS AND OTHER DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE OWNER WHICH EXISTING PLANTS ARE TO REMAIN. EXISTING PLANTS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH OWNER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. ALL IVY IN PROJECT AREA SHALL BE REMOVED; IVY SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH HERBICIDE TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 3. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES SHALL BE CONFIRMED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO REMOVAL. EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED SHALL HAVE A RED OR ORANGE TAPE SECURED TO A BRANCH, AND THE TRUNK SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH PAINT OF THE SAME COLOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY THE MATERIALS FOR MARKING THE TREES AND COORDINATE WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHIECT. THE TREE STUMPS AND ROOTS SHALL ALSO BE REMOVED, AND SURROUNDING SURFACE RE -GRADED AND RESTORED. 4. SOIL TESTING SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED LABORATORY. A COPY OF THE REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZATION SHALL REFLECT THE NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFIED PLANT SPECIES. 5. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS SUCH AS LITTER, BROKEN CLAY POTS, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL. ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH DIAMETER WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING CONTENT: REDWOOD NITRIFIED COMPOST 40%, COARSE SAND 30%, BLACK TOPSOIL 30%. S. PLANT HOLES SHALL BE DOUBLE THE SIZE OF THE CONTAINER THE WALLS AND (generally). BASES OF PLANT HOLES SHALL BE SCARIFIED. HOLES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH THE FOLLOWING MIXTURE: 80%TO 20%IMPORTED SOIL TO EXISTING SOIL. 7. SOIL BERMS SHALL BE FORMED AROUND ALL PLANTS 1 GALLON SIZE AND LARGER. BASINS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH A 3" LAYER OF BARK CHIPS, MINIMUM OF 1" IN SIZE. 8. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FERTILIZED. FERTILIZER SHALL BE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TYPE, AGRIFORM OR EQUIVALENT. APPLICATION $HALL BE ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 9. TREES SHALL BE STAKED WITH TWO PRESSURE TREATED 2" DIAMETER POLES. TREE TRUNK SHALL BE SECURED WITH TWO RUBBER TIES OR STRAPS FORMING A FIGURE -EIGHT BETWEEN TRUNK AND STAKE. 11. ROOT BARRIERS FOR ALL TREES WITHIN EIGHT FEET OF PAVEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED. BARRIERS SHALL BE PLASTIC AND EXTEND COMPLETELY AROUND THE ROOT BALL, WITH A SOIL SPACE OF NO LESS THAN 6". THE DIAMETER OF THE BARRIER SHALL BE 42" MINIMUM, AND EXTEND TO A DEPTH OF 24". 12. ESPALIER PLANTS SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH A PREMANUFACTURED METAL TRELLIS, REFER TO DETAIL. 13. PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A THREE INCH LAYER OF BARK CHIPS. HAR WIRE MESH FENCING &HIGH W/EVERGREEN VINE PLANTING PLAN PLANT LIST No. Botanical Name Common Name CRY Size Remarks GI BIL Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree 2 36" Box Decid Tree TRI CON Tristania oonferta Brisbane Box 2 36" Box Evgn Tree ALY HUE Alyogyne huegell Blue Hibiscus 3 5 Gal Decid Shrub ARM MAR Armeria maritime Sea Pink 54 1 Gal Perennial BAN OLD Bambus oldhamii Oldham Bamboo 5 15 Gal Clumping Bamboo I CAR TES Carex testacea Bronze Sedge 12 5 Gal Perennial Grass ERI KAR Erigeron karvinskianis Santa Barbara Daisy 40 1 Gal LOW Shrub HEM SPP Hemerocallis'Yellow' Daylily 41 1 Gal Low Shrub ` LAV ANG Lavendula angustifolia English Lavender 20 5 Gal Low Shrub I UM PER Limonium perezii Sea Thrift 38 1 Gal. Perennial NAN DOM Nandina domestics Heavenly Bamboo 5 5 Gal Evgn Shrub PIT TEN Pittosporum tenuifolium Black Stem 6 15 Gal Evgn Shrub Pittosporum PHOR DW Phormium Dwarf Red Miniature Red Flax 28 1 Gal. Evgn Sub -shrub PHOR MC Phormium'Maori Chief' Flax 4 5 Gal Evgn Shrub RHAP IND Rhapiolepsis indica Indian Hawthorn 14 5 Gal Evgn Shrub 'Jack Evans' SAL GRE Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 5 Gal Evgn Shrub SOL HET Sollya heterophylla Australian Bluebells 25 1 Gal Ev Subshrub TUL VIO Tulbhagia violacea Society Garlic 22 1 Gal Ev Subshrub HAR VIO Hardenbergia violacea Lilac Vine 30 15 Gal Evgn Vine TRA JA Trachelospermum Star Jasmine 2 15 Gal Ev Espalier jasminoides Note: Contractor shall verify quantities WI#1TFy7 HAR VIO— METAL GRID FENCE STAMPED CONCRETE_ SCALE: 1 /8"= V -011 01 T 3• 16' 4 f 3- THICK SEMI PLAN PANEL, TYR £ T POST TO NSTCENTERS . PANEL LENGTH M 0". TYP. 3' ROUND OR SQUARE STEEL POST WIPOST CAP, POST TO MST CLEAR PANEL LENGTH #5104 CHANNEL TRIM OR RECOMMENDED AT TOP .777: TRIM OKIONAL •.REQUIREDO #5133X ;IgPANEL �h VERTICAL EDGESWITH i'.SPACER :_hr€FLEX 'C' RINGS 0 PANEL O�mineee e:ee:eeieeeeeeeie: e:eee:lss3i::e3e: —e::ee3e�e ':' TO PANEL SEAM 0 12" O.C+ OPTIONAL 3- THICK greenIIareen(V PANEL, WE IIIIa IIIIP 45105 STEEL EDGE TRIM RECOMMENDED 0 BOTTOM EDGE OF PANEL :eeeY.eeeheeY.eeeeeeleelel7.ulEs9=l emeed• FINISH GRADE POST IMBED LENGTH & FOUNING SIZE SHOULD BE VERIFIED BASED ON OVIN- I NOTE SPECIFIC L ENGINEERING MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON SITE ELEVATION SPECIFIC SOIL CONDITIONS, LOCAL WIND LOADS. AND VERTICAL HEIGHT OF MORE VERIFYPANELSPAN AND CLIP SWING MR ALL FREE STANDING PRESENCE INSTAILILATIONS AND ALL INSTALLATIONS PIT SAL GRE c a HAR I CONCRETE WALK DEPTH OF ROO' +4" (1 & 5 GAL.) +6" (15 GAL.) +12" (24" & 36") ROOT NOTE: INSTALL ROOTONFRIER PANELS, IWhx9r*, WHERETREE5ARE LOCATED WITHIN 8 FEET OF PAVEMENT, CURB. OR FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. CONCRETE TREES GI BIL CAR TES LIM PER BARK CHIPS, 3- LAYER (TYPJ TUL VI ARM MAR ERI KAR SOL HET TOP OF STAKE 6" BELOW HEAD ROOT - BARRIER DCATED DE EDGE BALL PLANT HOLE DIAMETERS 42" FOR /5 GAL., 60" FOR 24" BOX. TREE PLANTING IIIINot to Scale _SPACER-2x6CAP f �' �'•' 1,' d �:'-'••f' 16'DIA CONC. WI MINE 4 x 6 P.T. POSTS 14' IDOG BOLTS 2x HORIZ '1 BOARDS PLAN VIEW / CUT -AWAY 2x6 2x4 2x2 1-1M GAP TYP. - POST ANCHOR - FINISH GRADE DOTING MEL VERT )RCEMENT WOOD FENCE L Not to Scale Elm N M Q N CIN M Rk Q ^I MID �U�o V q O +-r =w Q OS 0 b. 0 O C e <o� Ca MV] �y OA J�Uo0 IR U U (~ 1--1 0 a U �Yy I.L W C C N 1�----�� W SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN REVISIONS BY 02/05/17 B.CH. 06/27/17 B.C. DATE August 2016 SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN J.G. CHECKED B. CH. JOB N0. SHEET L1.1 OF SHEETS 2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 118"=1'-0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN 118"=1'-0" WIN!n; I[:iAMIN D 2 D Y r 2 L G; GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SOLID CONTINUOUS BACKING FOR ALL WALL MTD. FIXTURES, ACCESSORIES, MILLWORK, EQUIPMENT RACKS, SHELVING, ETC. ALL BLOCKING TO BE SAME DIMENSION AS ASSOCIATED FRAMING, SEE AO.4. 2. SEE CIVIL & LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK. DIMENSION NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. SEE ENLARGED PLANS/DETAILS FOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN HERE. PLANNING NOTES 1. FOR UNIT AREAS AND CALCULATIONS SEE SHEET AO.3 — PLANNING AREA CALCULATIONS 2. *DECKS MIN. 10'-0" PER SIDE ON GROUND FLOOR & MIN. 3'-6" PER SIDE ON UPPER FLOORS. LEGEND C>7— WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE DROPPED SOFFIT ABOVE FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACK N PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH z $ 6 w NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of Levy Design Partners Inc. and shall not be used except by written agreement with Levy Design Partners C\4 00 ,�D ARC \ 0 C-10527 Z RENEWAL DATE Q 6-30-19 \FUF CAS-, 21 PARK ROAD APN: 029-223-130 BURLINGAME, CA PROJECT NO. 2016-03 DATE SETISSUE 09-29-2016 PLANNING SUBMISSION /1\02-10-2016 PLANNING RESPONSE /2\07-07-2017 PLANNING RESPONSE CONTACT: TOBY LEVY (415) 777-0561 P (415) 777-5117 F SCALE: AS NOTED FLOOR PLANS: FIRST & SECOND FLOORS A201 0 38'-1" r7 N THIRD FLOOR PLAN 118"=1'-0" ROOF PLAN 118"=1'-0" 20'-3" 17'-7" 6'-0" (TYP-) 191'-8" 13'-2" (TYP.) WIN!n; 142'-4" 162"-4" 4/A3.1 129' —10" 162'-4" 19'-2" (TYP.) L 6'-0" V 13'-11" 11'-3" 12'-3" I 00 0 I J 1 T N 00 O I I Q � o r7 LO O GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SOLID CONTINUOUS BACKING FOR ALL WALL MTD. FIXTURES, ACCESSORIES, MILLWORK, EQUIPMENT RACKS, SHELVING, ETC. ALL BLOCKING TO BE SAME DIMENSION AS ASSOCIATED FRAMING, SEE AO.4. 2. SEE CIVIL & LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK. DIMENSION NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. SEE ENLARGED PLANS/DETAILS FOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN HERE. PLANNING NOTES 1. FOR UNIT AREAS AND CALCULATIONS SEE SHEET AO.3 — PLANNING AREA CALCULATIONS 2. *DECKS MIN. 10'-0" PER SIDE ON GROUND FLOOR & MIN. 3'-6" PER SIDE ON UPPER FLOORS. LEGEND WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE DROPPED FOR MECHANICAL CCHANIICALEQUIPMEENT WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACK N � PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH z $ w NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of Levy Design Partners Inc. and shall not be used except by written agreement with Levy Design Partners C\4 00 ,�D ARC \ 0 C-10527 Z RENEWAL DATE Q 6-30-19 \FUF CAS-, 21 PARK ROAD APN: 029-223-130 BURLINGAME, CA PROJECT NO. 2016-03 DATE SETISSUE 09-29-2016 PLANNING SUBMISSION /1\02-10-2016 PLANNING RESPONSE /2\07-07-2017 PLANNING RESPONSE CONTACT: TOBY LEVY (415) 777-0561 P (415) 777-5117 F SCALE: AS NOTED FLOOR PLANS: THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLAN P,,r? j 1 AIJAP (E) BUILDING V-_\40.6 TO BE REMOVED_ 40.6 EXI5T/NO4U:5 �� 40.5 W FW FE N 48°29' TW ----- ---- x -- - -----X X --- - -� --X X X -X - � ------------- _ 39.66 COTG 39.52 ST 39.41 39.37 0 o E I ' 39.22 \ FL FL.- SEWER F 4-7�------- 4D 35----- ---- \ S=0.01 (MIN.) 3 vv SS SS SS P.A. �r----------- - - - - - - 7 r-----------�- TRASH n �40.00 P X38.75 X3824 £ II I II I II I II I II I 38. 75' 38. 4 £ I I II I I I II I I I II I I II I I I II I 38.62 TG (E) TREE CONSTRUCT NEW 10' WIDE 36.12 INV TO BE DRIVEWAY PER CITY -X REMOVED Pp 98 STANDARDS 95 x 38, 7 g X 30 1 2CUT PLUG AND NEW 6" PVC 0.5. 38.87 38.7 0 FP CO TG ABANDON EXIST. SEWER LATERAL £ G.B. FL FL SEWER LATERAL S=0.02 -ss SS SS -------------------- - ss L-------J BUILDING LINE L-- ----� 20 LF 6" PVC O EXIST. WM AND SERVICE TO ` ENCLOSURE -- o ABOVE �� rn S=0.02 I I 11. MAIN AND TO BE USED ` 39.65XI ��I N� NEW PAVED ��bR IRRIGATION 40.20 _ FP ��,���� cv� NEW PAVED 38.18 3 17 LF 3�' PVC \ - DRIVEWAY LOT 1 DRIVEWAY 39.12 39.00 5% 37.69 FP _ FP P.A. �� �O. ` EXI5T/NO Vel�� , - 39.71 39.71 Q QQ + 39.71 39.64 EXI T/N& FP FP MAX INV 5-0.02 v r �� - FP FP A=8,V59- S.F. FP FP Fp9.20 �U �DIN� FP.19 Fp9.14 v ��N� ��.0 RDS by '�� I'� �' I 37.35 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER 72 N INV MAIN PER CITY STANDARDS \ \\ 39.75 3p9.75 39.75 = 39.75 / 39.25 39.25 �� t 39.24 V- � 3g x 3 0 /j FG.20 FP FP P FP FP FP BUBBLER BOX 4 � �' 0 NEW WATER METER AND Q FF=40.25 I I FF=40.25 FF=40.25 1 I FF=40.25 FF=39.75 I I FF=39.75 38.54 TG I BFP SERVICE FOR DOMESTIC USE 36.5 BOX BOT. S S ` P.A. UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 3 3 �,10.7j 3 II I1� ------- --�-_- 3gg6t13396.00 IOIz� J88� 37 0 /A�FHAL i gI FOf H GARAGE GARAGE EGARAGE 925 FGGARAGE GF FFALX 40 - 3 17 fc LF � 3" PVC�O � 8.80 TG o S=0.02FF=39.75 FF=39.75 FF=39..� FF=39.75 FF=39.26 X�37.89 5 25- 3%UCOUT 2893g 37.55 7FEE EX/5TIN WOOS INV \ P.A. 6 L�11 111J 395..43 39.33 ��� REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY \ FP FP FP FP FP 39 AND CONSTRUCT NEW CONC. 0.5% 13 \ 41) --x- ----- ----------- - - - - ------ - - ---- ----- - ---- -- -- - - - � FP 38.35 CURB GUTTER AND SIDEWALK 2 N48` 9 51 2. 2 39.25 39.15 - � 3g _� PER CITY STANDARDS �\ \ 40.57 40.5 739.67 39.45 40.0 39.35 - FL 39 05 TG �1) LF 6 PVC REMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. CONCRETE -\09CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ALONG \`\ PROPERTY FRONTAGE. \ BASIS OF BEARINGS: PARK ROAD TAKEN AS N 41 ° 30' 30" W AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 35 OF MAPS AT PAGE 24, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS. BENCHMARK INFORMATION: THE ELEVATION OF 37.07 TAKEN ON THE RIM OF AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF PARK ROAD AND BAYSWATER AVENUE, CITY OF BURLINGAME DATUM AS SHOWN ON THAT PARCEL MAP "PARK PLAZA TOWERS" FILE IN VOLUME 20 AT PAGE 9, SAN MATEO COUNTY RECORDS. UTILITY NOTE: THE UTILITIES EXISTING ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY FIELD SURVEY. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND THE SURVEYOR/ENGINEER DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE THEIR COMPLETENESS, INDICATED LOCATION, OR SIZE. RECORD UTILITY LOCATION SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY EXPOSING THE UTILITY. SURVEY NOTE: THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAN PREPARED BY SDG ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING, DATED 01-24-14, PROJ. NO. 410.290. ARCHITECTURAL NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PREPARED BY LEVY DESIGN PARTNERS INC., FOR DIMENSIONS OF UNITS. .. EXI5T/NO EUILL7INO rr�JS,l ,r�J JJJ r��\���JJI Y I-F r OWNER / APPLICANT: 21 PARK ROAD, LLC 21 PARK ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 LAND SURVEYOR: RONALD R. ARCHER SDG ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING 3361 WALNUT BLVD. SUITE 120 BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 (925) 634-7000 CIVIL ENGINEER: DAN MACLEOD MACLEOD & ASSOCIATES 965 CENTER STREET SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 (650) 593-8580 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 029-223-130 EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING R1-8 UTILITIES SERVICES: WATER: CITY OF BURLINGAME SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF BURLINGAME GAS & ELECTRICAL: PG&E TELEPHONE: AT&T FIRE: CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE L- EXI -l:5 TI N0 5UILL71INO (E) BUILDING 19 8 TO BE REMOVED �W FL � 39.5 I I II TW A 38.01 INV S=0.01 I II I 39. 53 X 38. 55 X3868 II 9 I I QI I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I X ` 8 60 I I II I V) I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I . 3R LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE BFP BACK FLOW PREVENTER FF FINISH FLOOR FP FINISH PAVEMENT FG FINISH GRADE INV INVERT R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY TG TOP OF GRATE TW TOP OF WALL P.A. PLANTING AREA SS SANITARY SEWER LINE W WATER LINE F FIRE SERVICE LINE - - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE ❑® NEW DRAIN INLET TREE AS NOTED /gyp LAND SOS G. 44o G��O No.5304 A \`c OF r m-\1 � pFESS/p� ,-P�0.35048 OF CAL 8 NEW FIREWATER SERVICE PER CITY STANDARDS � II I I 0 �L Q) t.71bri1 lllV �JuriLL'1 4 8 16 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 8 ft. � � w 0 0 o O) N 0 0 CD 0 j j m V) z w �V) O Z C) z V)O Y O ~ U) 0 C) W J � IL m W I w a_ I I w I I � 0 00 v� 00 00 nnn u rn Ln Q Ln o Ln C-0 0 z 0 > 0 vrJ � cn Q Q� z U Cn Q J O J 0 Q C� a� w Ld w z Q z C/5 �ww J w jj n jj U cf) o- w w Q Ln Q z 0 LL- Q 40,10. a CID at= U 2z_ Z 0 Li Q0 co co C/) W co m a. 5 Q er 0 � n N Q < r- OU Q a o 0 O Q J H Z N z m z Z - � O o Z ZO � Q Q Q N (n 0 o �U >O w L Q U z J m DRAWN BY: AAP DESIGNED BY: VPG CHECKED BY: DGM SCALE: 1 "=8' 32 DATE: 09/19/16 DRAWING NO. 4352-TM SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE TO: FROM: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM October 17, 2017 Planning Commission Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2209 RAY DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review and Side Setback Variance for a first and second floor addition at 2209 Ray Drive, zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 23, 2015 (see attached November 23, 2015 P.C. Meeting Minutes). An application for Design Review Amendment and one-year extension was approved by the Commission on November 28, 2016, which included removing one window on the first floor along the front (east elevation), adding spacing between the windows on the first floor (west elevation) and removing one window on the second floor window at the front (east elevation). The building permit for the construction of the addition was issued on April 19, 2017 and the project is now under construction. The applicant is requesting approval to expand bathroom #3 located at the front of the second floor by approximately 17.5 SF. As detailed in the applicant's letter of request, while he was framing the upstairs bathroom he noticed that if he pulled the wall out toward the front approximately 2'-6" that it would line up with the parapet wall added to the first floor. If the bathroom is framed as approved there would be a "shelf' before the bathroom wall starts. Staff has verified that the proposed extension complies (exceeds) the required second floor front setback and the additional square footage complies with the zoning regulations and would bring the total FAR to 3,391 SF (0.33) where 4,368 SF (0.54) FAR is the maximum allowed on this 10, 214 SF parcel. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner Attachments: Explanation letter submitted by the applicant, date stamped October 16, 2017 November 23, 2015 and October 26, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes Originally approved and proposed second floor plans and east (front) elevations, date stamped October 16, 2017 c -s0Lc CONSTRUCTION CO. 2201Ray Dr. Burlingame, CA 94010 206-399-7930 moble 480-949-7573 fax Keith@BoleoConstruction.com October 16, 2017 Dear Members of Burlingame Planning Commission, We are presenting to you a proposed change in the upstairs bathroom directly over the front entrance of the house. We would like to pull the wall out in front approximately 2.5 ft to line up with the parapet wall added to the first floor for height. The parapet will come across as plans show. By leaving the front wall as is on the second floor, there will be a 2.5 ft exterior shelf before the bathroom wall starts. We'd like to clean it up by pushing that wall flush with the parapet. The Planning Department has confirmed that this does not affect any setback or lot coverage stipulations. Sincerely, xM Keith Bol CFP°, MBA, MS Vice President RECENEU OCT ` 6 1017 CITY OF 5URLINGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Monday, November 23, 2015 7:00 PM Council Chambers e. 2209 Ray Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Side Setback Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (Briggs McDonald, bmod Office of Design, applicant and architect; Ann Stephens and Keith Bol, property owners) (59 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Barber Commissioner Loftis recused himself from the discussion of this item as he resides within 500-feet of the property in question. He left the City Council Chambers. All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications to report. Senior Planner Barber provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff.' There were no questions of staff. Chair DeMartini opened the public hearing. Briggs McDonald represented the applicant. Commission questions/comments: There were no questions or comments. Public comments: There were no public comments. Chair DeMartini closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: > Need to be sensitive in the future to structures with flat roofs to permit effective treatment of the first and second floors. > Accepts the variances because it is an existing condition and the design fits with the existing architecture. Commissioner Gum made a motion, seconded by Chair DeMartini, to approve the application as submitted. Chair DeMartini asked for a voice vote, and the motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - DeMartini, Gum, Sargent, Terrones, Gaul, and Bandrapalli Recused: 1 - Loftis City or Burlingame Page 1 Printed on 10/1712017 Monday, October 26, 2016 City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 7:00 PM BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers d. 2209 Ray Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Side Setback Variance for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (Briggs McDonald, bmod Office of Design, applicant and architect; Ann Stephens and Keith Bol, property owners) (59 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Barber Vice -Chair Loftis noted that he would recuse himself from the discussion as he resides within 500-feet of the property. He left the City Council Chambers. All Commissioners had visited the property. Commissioners Temones, Bandrepalli, Sargent and Demartini met with the applicant at the site. Community Development Director Meeker provided an overview of the staff report. Questions of staff None. Chair De Martini closed the public hearing. Keith Bol and Briggs McDonald represented the applicant. Commission questions/comments: > Appreciated receiving the neighbors'support. > Will the new roof be flat with no parapets? Material? (McDonald: yes, will be of a membrane material of some sort. Will likely be nine to ten inches in thickness.) > What are the plate heights? (McDonald., explained the ceiling heights. Ceiling heights will vary from 11' 7' to 10' 4"on the second floor. On the first floor the height will range from 8' 8" to 10' 7" at the rear) > Is the entry way porch at the same level as the sidewalk? (McDonald: yes.) > The owners do not seem to be married to changing the siding on the ground floor from vertical to horizontal. (McDonald: explained the approach to installing the siding.) > Expressed concern about the transition between the different siding orientations. Couldn't all of the ground floor siding be horizontal? (McDonald., provide the transitions at less visible areas. Could be all horizontal, but would be difficult to transition between new and old materials.) > Suggested having all of the siding on the ground floor vertical in orientation. > Will the fascia on the new roof match the existing fascia? Need to match as closely as possible. (McDonald., will be a bit larger given required finishing.) > Will the chimney be extended up with brick? (McDonald: will be brick.) > With respect to the deck, is there a door from bedroom four to the area? Is a pretty sizeable deck; concerned. (McDonald: not a critical element of the design. Received some comments from the neighbor.) > Did the neighbor behind the property weigh-in on the design? (Bol: liked it and had no complaints.) Public comments: City o1 Burlingame Page 1 Printed on t0/17/2017 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 26, 2016 Chuck Wallace, 2301 Ray Drive: feels the setback is fine in instances like this if the Commission grants them periodically. Has some concerns regarding the second floor deck facing his property. Noise could be an issue depending upon who lives on the property. Chair DeMartini closed the public hearing. Commission discussion: > Likes the design with the addition. > Supportive of the variance as it follows the lines of the house and is architectural compatible. Also is a large lot. > Have been instances where the Commission has granted approval of the continuation of a non -conforming setback. > Design is much better, still some details to be worked out with respect to the siding and the size of the deck. > Encourage a deck that can accommodate no more than two or three people. > Suggested keeping the new fascia within the realm of six to eight inches. Nine inches and beyond would be too large. Wouldn't suggest matching the existing fascia on the lower floor to match the new addition, but if they do match it would not be problematic. > Given that the ground floor is at ground level and the home has flat roofs, doesn't have a problem with. the design. > Design seems to be generally supported, but still need to review the upper deck, the siding and perhaps the fascia design reviewed. Chair DeMartini made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Sargent, to continue the item. Discussion of motion: > Agrees that there are a number of items that need review. Chair DeMartini asked for a voice vote, and the motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - DeMartini, Loftis, Gum, Sargent, Terrones, Gaul, and Bandrapalli City or Burlingame Page 2 Printed on 10/17/2017