Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - PC - 2019.05.28Planning Commission City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers7:00 PMTuesday, May 28, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA Members of the public may speak about any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Planning Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period . The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Planning Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are asked to fill out a "request to speak " card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff, although the provision of a name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each; the Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 6. STUDY ITEMS 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and /or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. 8. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 133 Clarendon Road, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e) (1) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Jesse Geurse, Geuse Conceptual Design, Inc ., applicant and designer; Matt Rossen, property owner) (118 noticed) Staff Contact: Michelle Markiewicz a. 133 Clarendon Rd - Staff Report 133 Clarendon Rd - Attachments 133 Clarendon Rd - Plans Attachments: Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 5/23/2019 May 28, 2019Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 1316 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two -story single family dwelling and detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (a). (James Chu, Chu Design Associates, Inc ., applicant and designer; 1316 Capuchino Avenue, LLC, property owner) (128 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit b. 1316 Capuchino Ave - Staff Report 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments 1316 Capuchino Ave - Plans Attachments: 25 Arundel Road, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing split -level house. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1). (Channing and Carrie Chen, applicants and property owners) (126 noticed) Staff Contact: Catherine Keylon c. 25 Arundel Rd - Staff Report 25 Arundel Rd - Attachments 25 Arundel Rd - Plans Attachments: 834 Crossway Road, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved project for a new, two -story single family dwelling with a detached garage. This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a). (John Nguyen, Dulon, Inc ., applicant and designer; Tony Leung, property owner) (130 noticed) Staff Contact: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi d. 834 Crossway Rd - Staff Report 834 Crossway Rd - Attachments 834 Crossway Rd - Plans Attachments: 9. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY 217 Channing Road, zoned R -1 - Application for Design Review for a new, two -story single family dwelling and detached garage. (Rob Wehmeyer, RC Wehmeyer, applicant and designer; Somrat and Sarah Niyogi, property owners) (140 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit a. 217 Channing Rd - Staff Report 217 Channing Rd - Attachments 217 Channing Rd - Plans Attachments: Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 5/23/2019 May 28, 2019Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 1543 Cypress Avenue, zoned R-1- Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an existing detached garage . (Christian Ruffat, applicant and architect; Alicia Sanguinetti, property owner) (130 noticed) Staff Contact: Sonal Aggarwal b. 1543 Cypress Ave - Staff Report 1543 Cypress Ave - Attachments 1543 Cypress Ave - Historic Resource Study 1543 Cypress Ave - Plans Attachments: 2617 Easton Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review, Special Permit for Declining Height Envelope, and Front Setback Variance for a second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. (Alicia Ader, Dreiling Terrones Architecture, applicant and architect; Tricia and Darren Tayama, property owners) (89 noticed) Staff Contact: Erika Lewit c. 2617 Easton Dr - Staff Report 2617 Easton Dr - Attachments 2617 Easton Dr - Plans Attachments: 12 Valdivia Court, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling. (Audrey Tse, applicant and designer; Douglas Solomon & Lauri Pasch, property owners) (54 noticed) Staff Contact: Michelle Markiewicz d. 12 Valdivia Ct - Staff Report 12 Valdivia Ct - Attachments 12 Valdivia Ct - Plans Attachments: 10. COMMISSIONER’S REPORTS 11. DIRECTOR REPORTS - Commission Communications - City Council regular meeting May 20, 2019 12. ADJOURNMENT Note: An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's action on May 28, 2019. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, the action becomes final. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $551, which includes noticing costs. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Community Development/Planning counter, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 5/23/2019 City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 133 Clarendon Road Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Property Owner: Matthew Rossen APN: 029-273-070 Applicant and Designer: Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. Lot Area: 7,875 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided that addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The existing two-story house with a detached one-car garage contains 2,661 SF (0.34 FAR) of floor area. The proposed project includes a rear addition to both the first and second story that would increase the floor area to 3,486 SF (0.44 FAR), where 4,005 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including a 12.57 SF covered front porch exception). The proposed project is 825 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The existing house contains five bedrooms and the proposed project is decreasing to four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for a four-bedroom house. The existing garage (18’-6” x 18’-6” clear interior dimensions) qualifies as a non-conforming two-car garage. One uncovered parking space (9’-0” x 20’-0”) is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with o ff-street parking requirements. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application:  Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a)(2)). 133 Clarendon Road Lot Size: 7,875 SF Plans date stamped: May 14, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 19’-8 ½” n/a no change 32’-11” 15’-0” or block average 20’-0” Side Setback (left): (right): 6’-1 ½” 11’-9” 5’-11” (to addition) 13’-8 ½” 4'-0" 4’-0” Rear Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 85’-9 ½” 94’-7 ½” 77’-6 ½” 76’-8 ½” 15'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 1,864 SF 23.7 % 2,032 SF 25.8 % 3,150 SF 40 % FAR: 2,661 SF 0.34 FAR 3,486 SF 0.44 FAR 4,005 SF 1 0.51 FAR 1 (0.32 x 7,875 SF) + 1,100 SF+ 385 SF = 4,005 SF (0.51 FAR) Item No. 8a Regular Action Item Design Review 133 Clarendon Rd 2 133 Clarendon Road Lot Size: 7,875 SF Plans date stamped: May 14, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED # of bedrooms: 5 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 2 covered (18’-6” x 18’-6” clear interior) 2 1 uncovered (9’ x 20’) 2 covered (18’-6” x 18’-6” clear interior) 1 uncovered (9’ x 20’) 1 covered (10' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Building Height: 29’-7 ¼” 29’-7 ¼” 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 2 The existing detached garage measures 18’-6” x 18’-6”, which qualifies as a non-conforming two-car garage. Staff Comments: None. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on April 22, 2019, the Commission had comments regarding the configuration of the chimney along the left elevation, roof styles and materials, and window consistency (see attached April 22, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes). The Commission voted to place the project on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed. The applicant submitted a response letter dated April 25, 2019, and revised plans date stamped May 14, 2019, to address the Planning Commission’s comments. Please refer to the April 22, 2019 Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of comments and direction provided by the Commission. Although the designer will be available to address additional comments/questions from the Commission during his presentation at the action hearing, listed below are the summarized revisions to the project and plans provided by the applicant. 1. All existing windows will be replaced to match proposed windows. 2. Chimney along left elevation has been reconfigured. 3. Roof styles and materials have been replaced on lower existing projections on left and right side elevations and a new standing metal seam roof is proposed on the front elevation. Roofing over second floor addition along right side of house has also be changed to provide consistency. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Design Review 133 Clarendon Rd 3 Suggested Findings for Design Review: The architectural style of the proposed first and second story addition is similar to the existing home and is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood. The project proposes a variety of materials including asphalt shingle and standing seam metal roofing, cement plaster, stone veneer, and aluminum clad wood casement windows and doors with simulated true divided lite grids and wood trim. The articulation provides visual interest on all elevations and the architectural elements of the proposed structure compliments the neighborhood; for these reasons the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City’s five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Act ion should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission’s decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 14, 2019, sheets SP.1, DM.1, and A.1-A.7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, ar chitectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage which would include adding or enlarging a dormer (s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shal l be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet lis ting all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 6. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flies shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycl ing Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; Design Review 133 Clarendon Rd 4 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BU ILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 9. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural ce rtification that the architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 10. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been build according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Michelle Markiewicz Assistant Planner c. Matthew Rossen, property owner Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc., applicant and designer Attachments: April 22, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant’s Response Letter, dated April 25, 2019 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (proposed) Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed May 17, 2019 Area Map City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1316 Capuchino Avenue Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and a detached garage. Designer: James Chu, Chu Design Associates APN: 026-085-180 Applicant and Property Owner: 1316 Capuchino Avenue LLC Lot Area: 5,998 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone, is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, this exemption may be applied to the construction or conversion of up to three (3) single-family residences as part of a project. Project Description: The subject property is an interior lot. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing single-story house with a porte cochere and the detached garage and workshop structures in the rear yard. A new, two-story house with a detached garage is proposed on the site. The proposed new house and detached garage will have 3,417 SF (0.57 FAR) of floor area where 3,419 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including front-facing covered porch exemptions). The proposed house and detached garage is two square feet below the maximum allowed FAR. There will be a total of five bedrooms in the proposed main dwelling. A total of three on-site parking spaces are required, one of which must be covered. The detached garage provides two covered parking spaces (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) and an uncovered parking space is provided in the driveway leading to the garage. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following application:  Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (1)). 1316 Capuchino Avenue Lot Area: 5,998 SF Plans date stamped: May 15, 2019 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED SETBACKS Front (1st flr): (2nd flr): 18'-0" 22'-2" 18'-0" is the block average 20'-0" Side (left): (right): 5'-6" 9'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" Rear (1st flr): (2nd flr): 28'-0" 37'-9" 15'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,191 SF 37% 2,399 SF 40% FAR: 3,417 SF 0.57 FAR 3,419 SF ¹ 0.57 FAR ¹ (0.32 x 5,998 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400= 3,419 SF (0.57 FAR) Item No. 8b Regular Action Design Review 1316 Capuchino Avenue 2 1316 Capuchino Avenue Lot Area: 5,998 SF Plans date stamped: May 15, 2019 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED # of bedrooms: 5 --- Off-Street Parking: 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 2 covered (20' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Building Height: 25'-10" 30'-0" Staff Comments: There are no protected size trees on the site, however there is an existing protected size Magnolia street tree in the planter strip right-of-way in front of the house. The attached Parks Division comments, dated April 10, 2019, require that the recommendations for tree protection and liquid fertilizer detailed in the Certified Arborist Report prepared by Kielty Arborist Services, dated March 28, 2019 (provided on sheet A.2), be completed at the time of demolition. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on May 13, 2019, the Commission had several suggestions regarding this project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (see attached May 13, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted a response letter and revised plans, date stamped May 15, 2019, to address some of the Planning Commission’s comments. Listed below are the revisions made to the project by the applicant: ▪ the dormer on the second floor of the right elevation has been reduced in length and the window has been reduced in size in order to allow more privacy for the neighbor on that side; and ▪ the proposed rounded clay gable vents throughout the new house have been reduced in size from six inches to four inches in order to better match the scale of the house. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Findings for Design Review: At the May 13, 2019 Design Review Study the Planning Commission noted that the proposed design was architecturally consistent with a Spanish bungalow style, including the stucco exterior, clay tile roofing, recessed casement windows, wood doors, and clay tube gable vents. The site layout, with a detached garage in the left rear corner, will provide separation from the adjacent neighbor and is consistent with the development pattern in the neighborhood. For these reasons the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City’s five design review criteria. Design Review 1316 Capuchino Avenue 3 Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission’s decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 15, 2019, sheets A.1 through A.6, N.1, L.1 and Topographic and Boundary Survey stamped April 24, 2019; including aluminum or fiberglass clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites; 2. that prior to final building inspection the existing 4-inch trench drain that outlets to the rear alley shall be removed and all drainage shall be brought up to the street via sump pump, or other approved mechanism, in accordance with Public Works requirements; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; Design Review 1316 Capuchino Avenue 4 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erika Lewit Senior Planner c. James Chu, Chu Design Associates Attachments: Applicant's Response Letter, date stamped May 15, 2019 May 13, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Application to the Planning Commission Parks Division comments, dated April 10, 2019 Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed May 17, 2019 Area Map 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 1/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 2/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 3/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 4/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 5/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 6/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 7/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 8/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 9/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 8/28/2019 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/index.html 10/10 19-0416 - 1316 Capuchino Ave - Attachments /101 PROJECT LOCATION 834 Crossway Road Item No. 8d Regular Action Item City of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Address: 834 Crossway Road Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously approved application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with detached garage. Applicant and Designer: John Nguyen, Dulon, Inc. APN: 029-021-310 Property Owner: Tony Leung Lot Area: 6,737 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. History and Amendment to Design Review: An application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage at 834 Crossway Road was approved by the Planning Commission on July 9, 2018 (see attached July 9, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). An FYI for revisions requested by the Planning Commission was approved on August 13, 2018 (see attached). The applicant was issued a building permit on March 26, 2019. Following the approval of the design review application and issuance of the building permit, an amendment to increase the first floor plate height to 9’-1” (8’-1” previously approved) was approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 2019 . During this hearing, the Commission had expressed concerns about the height of the proposed windows and doors and how they would scale in relation to the increase in plate height. These comments prompted the applicant to raise the proposed window and door heights of the project , which requires an application for an amendment to the previously approved project. The applicant has provided a letter of explanation, date stamped May 14, 2019 and plans have also been submitted showing the originally approved and proposed building elevations, date stamped May 14, 2019. Description of Previously Approved Project: The subject property is an interior lot bordering an R-2 zone at the left side and rear of the property. The previously approved project includes demolishing an existing one-story house and detached garage and building a new, two-story single family dwelling with a detached garage. The house and garage has a total floor area of 3,603 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,656 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including 77 SF covered porch exemption). The new single family dwelling contains four bedrooms. Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on-site. Two covered parking spaces are provided in the detached garage (20’ x 20’ clear interior dimensions) and one uncovered parking space (9’ x 20’) is provided in the driveway. Th erefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The following application was previously approved for this project:  Design Review for a new single family dwelling and detached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a)(1)). This space intentionally left blank. Item No. 8d Regular Action Item Design Review Amendment 834 Crossway Road 2 834 Crossway Road Lot Area: 6,737 SF Plans date stamped: May 14, 2019 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 07/09/18 Plans AMENDED 05/14/19 Plans ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 18’-7” (to porch) 20’-1” no change no change 18’-7” (block average) 20’-0” (block average) Side Setback (left): (right): 4’-0” 9’-6” no change no change 4'-0" 4’-0” Rear Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 67’-0” 67’-0” no change no change 15'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,355 SF 35% no change 2,695 SF 40% FAR: 3,603 SF 0.53 FAR no change 3,656 SF 1 0.54 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 no change --- Off-Street Parking: 2 covered (20’ x 20’ clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') no change 2 covered (20' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') Building Height: 26’-0” 26’-9” 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 1 (0.32 x 6,737) + 1,100 + 400 SF = 3,656SF (0.54) FAR Staff Comments: None. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Suggested Findings for Design Review: That the architectural style, mass and bulk of the addition (featuring gable roof and dormers, proportional plate heights, stucco and wood siding, and aluminum clad windows with wood trim) is compatible with the variety of styles that define the character of the neighborhood and that the windows and architectural elements of the proposed structure are placed so that the structure respects the interface with the structures on adjacent properties, therefore the project may be found to be compatible with the requirements of the City’s five design review criteria. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, Design Review Amendment 834 Crossway Road 3 and consider public testimony and the analysis co ntained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission’s decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped July 3, 2018, sheets G001, A100 through A1 03, and L101 and date stamped April 16, 2019, sheets A3.1 through A3.4; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, wind ows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth movi ng on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is is sued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Buil ding and Uniform Fire Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting Design Review Amendment 834 Crossway Road 4 framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Buildi ng Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note complianc e of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans . ‘Amelia Kolokihakaufisi Associate Planner c. Tony Leung, property owner Attachments: April 22, 2019 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant Letter of Explanation, date stamped May 14, 2019 Application to the Planning Commission July 9, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Applicant Letter of Explanation , date stamped April 16, 2019 FYI Memo – dated August 7, 2018 Application to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed May 17, 2019 Area Map 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"AVE. LEFT+40.99'AVE. RIGHT+39.4PROPERTY LINE @ FRONT8'-1"6'-0"8'-1"PROPERTY LINE14'-0"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT14'-0"45°PROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"7'-6"STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFPAINTED GLV. METALGUTTER, TYP.PAINTED 2x8 WDFASCIA BDPAINTED 3-1/2"WD TRIM, TYP.STAINED 8x8 WD POST6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGPAINTED 9 1/4" WD TRIMALUMINUM CLADWINDOWS W/ SIMULATEDTRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.45°DOWN SPOUT26'-9"36" x 60"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWA236" x 60"DOUBLE HUNGEGRESS WINDOWA2A1A1A1A1102STANDINGSEAM METALROOFWD. CORBEL @ EA.SIDE, STAIN TO MATCHWD. POST @ PORCHSTANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFSTAINED WD RAILING W/2x2 WD BALUSTERSDULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.1 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE53' - 7"2ND FLOOR54' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE62' - 8 5/8"AVE. LEFT+40.99'30'-0"AVE. RIGHT+39.4PROPERTY LINE @ FRONT9'-1"6'-0"8'-1"PROPERTY LINE14'-0"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT14'-0"45°PROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE68' - 8 31/32"7'-6"STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFPAINTED GLV. METALGUTTER, TYP.PAINTED 2x8 WDFASCIA BDPAINTED 3-1/2"WD TRIM, TYP.STAINED 8x8 WD POST6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGPAINTED 9 1/4" WD TRIMALUMINUM CLADWINDOWS W/ SIMULATEDTRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.45°DOWN SPOUT27'-9"36" x 60"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWA236" x 60"DOUBLE HUNGEGRESS WINDOWA2A1A1A1A1102STANDINGSEAM METALROOFWD. CORBEL @ EA.SIDE, STAIN TO MATCHWD. POST @ PORCHSTANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFSTAINED WD RAILING W/2x2 WD BALUSTERSAVE. LEFT+40.99'AVE. RIGHT+39.49'-1"6'-0"8'-1"PROPERTY LINE14'-0"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT14'-0"45°7'-6"STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFPAINTED GLV. METALGUTTER, TYP.PAINTED 2x8 WDFASCIA BDPAINTED3-1/2" WDTRIM, TYP.STAINED 6x6 WD POST6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGALUMINUM CLADWINDOWS W/ SIMULATEDTRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.DOWN SPOUT36" x 54"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWH36" x 60"DOUBLE HUNGEGRESS WINDOWHAAAA102STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFWD. CORBEL @ EA.SIDE, STAIN TO MATCHWD. POST @ PORCHSTANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFSTAINED WD RAILING W/2x2 WD BALUSTERS7'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"7'-0"1ST FLOOR43' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"30'-0"PROPERTY LINE @ FRONTPROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"26'-9"45°DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.2 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITT.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"8'-1"±6'-0"8'-1"ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV. METAL GUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT26'-9"CHIMNEY CAP & FLUEEXTENSIONSTONE VENEERAROUND CHIMNEYA1A1A1A1C2C2C2BBBA1A1A1A1C1C1STAINED 8x8 WD. POSTDOWNSPOUTWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAIN TOMATCH WD. POST @ PORCH6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGPAINTED 2x8 WD FASCIA BDSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2 WDBALUSTERS2'-3 5/8"DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.3 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE53' - 7"2ND FLOOR54' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE62' - 8 5/8"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITT.O. ROOF RIDGE68' - 8 31/32"9'-1"±6'-0"8'-1"ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV. METAL GUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT27'-9"CHIMNEY CAP & FLUEEXTENSIONSTONE VENEERAROUND CHIMNEYA1A1A1A1C2C2C2BBBA1A1A1A1C1C1STAINED 8x8 WD. POSTDOWNSPOUTWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAIN TOMATCH WD. POST @ PORCH6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGPAINTED 2x8 WD FASCIA BDSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2 WDBALUSTERS2'-7"1ST FLOOR43' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITT.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"9'-1"±6'-0"8'-1"ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV. METAL GUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT26'-9"CHIMNEY CAP & FLUEEXTENSIONSTONE VENEERAROUND CHIMNEYHAAAC2C2C2BBBAAAHC1C1STAINED 6x6 WD. POSTWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAIN TOMATCH WD. POST @ PORCH6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGPAINTED 2x8 WD FASCIA BDSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2 WDBALUSTERS7'-0"7'-0"2'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"2'-1 5/8"DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.4 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"30'-0"PROPERTY LINE @ FRONTPROPERTY LINE30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITAVE. LEFT+40.99'45°8'-1"8'-1"6'-0"PROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"PAINTED 3-1/2" WDTRIM, TYP.6" PAINTED LAPSIDINGSTONE VENEER AT CHIMNEYPEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV METALGUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT26'-9"36" x 60"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWA1A1CHIMNEY CAP & FLUE EXTENSION2'-0"MINDDD1089'-6"AVE. RIGHT+39.414'-0"45°CORNERS TO BEMITERED, TYP.14'-0"7'-6"2ND DHE+39.445°DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.5 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE53' - 7"2ND FLOOR54' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE62' - 8 5/8"30'-0"PROPERTY LINE @ FRONTPROPERTY LINE30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITAVE. LEFT+40.99'45°9'-1"8'-1"6'-0"PROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE68' - 8 31/32"PAINTED 3-1/2" WDTRIM, TYP.6" PAINTED LAPSIDINGSTONE VENEER AT CHIMNEYPEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV METAL GUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT27'-9"36" x 60"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWA1A1CHIMNEY CAP & FLUE EXTENSION2'-0"MINDDD1089'-6"AVE. RIGHT+39.414'-0"45°CORNERS TO BEMITERED, TYP.14'-0"7'-6"2ND DHE+39.445°1ST FLOOR43' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"30'-0"PROPERTY LINE @ FRONTPROPERTY LINE30'-0" HEIGHT LIMITAVE. LEFT+40.99'45°9'-1"8'-1"6'-0"PROPERTY LINE@ REART.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"PAINTED 3-1/2" WDTRIM, TYP.6" PAINTED LAPSIDINGSTONE VENEER AT CHIMNEYPEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.PAINTED GLV METAL GUTTER, TYP.DOWNSPOUT26'-9"36" x 54"DOUBLEHUNGEGRESSWINDOWHHCHIMNEY CAP & FLUE EXTENSION2'-0"MINDDD1089'-6"AVE. RIGHT+39.414'-0"45°CORNERS TO BEMITERED, TYP.8'-0"8'-0"7'-0"14'-0"7'-6"2ND DHE+39.445°DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.6 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"T.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT8'-1"6'-0"8'-1"`DOWNSPOUTPAINTED GLV MTL GUTTER,TYP.DOWN SPOUT26'-9"ALUMINUM CLAD SLIDING DOORW/ GLAZING & SIMULATED TRUEDIVIDED LITESWOOD DECKSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2WD BALUSTERSG1G1A1A1110A1EEG1G1CHIMNEY CAP & FLUEEXTENSIONFFEEWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAINTO MATCH WD. POST @ PORCHG2PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDINGSEAM METAL ROOF, TYP.6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGCORNERS TO BE MITERED, TYP.DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.7 1ST FLOOR44' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE53' - 7"2ND FLOOR54' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE62' - 8 5/8"T.O. ROOF RIDGE68' - 8 31/32"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT9'-1"6'-0"8'-1"DOWNSPOUTPAINTED GLV MTL GUTTER,TYP.DOWN SPOUT27'-9"ALUMINUM CLAD SLIDING DOORW/ GLAZING & SIMULATED TRUEDIVIDED LITESWOOD DECKSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2WD BALUSTERSG1G1A1A1110A1EEG1G1CHIMNEY CAP & FLUEEXTENSIONFFEEWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAINTO MATCH WD. POST @ PORCHG2PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDINGSEAM METAL ROOF, TYP.6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGCORNERS TO BE MITERED, TYP.1ST FLOOR43' - 6"T.O. GRADE42' - 10 11/16"AVE. T.O. CURB41' - 0 1/16"1ST FL TOP PLATE52' - 7"2ND FLOOR53' - 7 5/8"2ND FL TOP PLATE61' - 8 5/8"T.O. ROOF RIDGE67' - 8 31/32"30'-0" HEIGHT LIMIT9'-1"6'-0"8'-1"DOWNSPOUTPAINTED GLV MTL GUTTER, TYP.DOWN SPOUT26'-9"ALUMINUM CLAD SLIDING DOORW/ GLAZING & SIMULATED TRUEDIVIDED LITESWOOD DECKSTAINED WD RAILING W/ 2x2 WDBALUSTERSGGAA110AFFGGCHIMNEY CAP & FLUE EXTENSIONEEFFWD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAINTO MATCH WD. POST @ PORCHEPEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOFALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS W/SIMULATED TRUE DIVIDED LITESWHERE INDICATED, TYP.PEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF, TYP.6" PAINTED LAP SIDINGCORNERS TO BE MITERED, TYP.WD. CORBEL @ EA. SIDE, STAINTO MATCH WD. POST @ DECKPEWTER GRAY STANDING SEAMMETAL ROOF8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"7'-0"6'-6"7'-0"6'-6"DULON, INC.4010 OAK SHORES DRIVESTOCKTON, CA 95209A3.8 AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtA0.2 EXTERIOR 3-D VIEWS 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 4/19/2019 Response to Planning PC2 2 TOS GARAGE +101.60 (E) FIRST FL. F.F. +104.99 (E) FIRST FLOOR T.O. PLATE +113.32 (E) T.O. RIDGE +120.36 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION T.O.C. ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE T.O.C. ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE +100.45 +100.74 +99.50 +101.11 +100.50 +99.79 12'-0"12'-0"(E) SECOND FLOOR F.F. +108.57 BASEMENT +96.917'-0 1/2"4'-9"3'-7"3'-5"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"7'-0 1/2"8'-4"5'-4 1/4"2'-8 3/4"20'-8 1/2"2'-11 1/2" 20'-2" 3" 12" 3" 12"+/- +/- D1 W25 W24 W23 W1W2 D18 TOS GARAGE +101.60 (E) FIRST FL. F.F. +104.99 SECOND FLOOR F.F. +113.99 SECOND FL. T.O. PLATE +121.99 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 T.O. RIDGE +129.08 7'-1"8'-0"1'-2"9'-0"2'-3"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"15'-1"9'-0"5'-4 1/4"29'-5 1/4"(N) FIRST FLOOR T.O.PLATE +112.82 BASEMENT +96.917'-6"7'-6"(N) FIRST FL. F.F. +103.82 11'-5" 10'-2" 9'-11"5'-9"1'-2"1'-2"6" 12" D21D20D22 W54 W53W55 W78 W77W79W57W56W58 27 1/2"39 1/2"27 1/2"39 1/2"217 D23 AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION T.O.C. ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE T.O.C. ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE +100.45 +100.74 +99.50 +101.11 +100.50 +99.79 12'-0"12'-0"4'-6" 6" 12" 6" 12" AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtA3.0 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATIONS 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION EXISTING 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH (FRONT) ELEVATION PROPOSEDLEFT PROPERTY LINERIGHT PROPERTY LINE(N) 10" PAINTED WOOD FASCIA TYP. (N) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TYP. (N) HARDIESHINGLE SIDING 6" EXPOSURE TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD AND GLASS FRONT DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) DETACHED SINGLE CAR GARAGE WITH PAINTED WOOD AND GLASS GARAGE DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED 1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS IN PROPOSED ELEVATION ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED AS EXISTING (E) 2. ALL NEW WINDOWS ARE FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOWS WITH SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHTS 3. SEE SHEET A5.0 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE 4. SEE SHEET A9.0 FOR TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL 5. (N) BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION SHOW IN PROPOSED ELEVATION. THE TYPE WILL BE SUCH THAT NUMBERS AND ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDING IN SUCH A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FRON THE FRONT OF THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. SAID NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF ONE-HALF INCH STROKE BY FOUR INCHES HIGH, AND SHALL BE EITHER INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS OR REPAIR OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. THE POWER OF SUCH ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT BE NORMALLY SWITCHABLE. SHEET NOTES (E) COVERED FRONT PORCH AND STAIRS TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) CARPORTAND STUCCO COLUMNS TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) 6" WOOD WATER TABLE TYP. (E) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (E) LEFT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (E) STUCCO EXTERIOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (N) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (N) LEFT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK LINE(E) CHIMNEY AND FIREPLACE TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) VERTICAL CEMENTOUS SIDING W/ 6" EXPOSURE TYP.RIGHT SIDE SETBACK LINE(E) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (N) WOOD FRONT PORCH W/ STONE VENEER AND (N) WOOD RAILING AND COLUMN W/ WOOD TOP AND BASE TYP. (N) LOWERED BY 1'-2" FIRST FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL EGRESS WINDOW BEDROOM 2 W/ CLEARANCE OF 27 1/2" X 39 1/2" AND SILL AT 38" (N) TRIANGULAR RIDGE VENT ON GABLE ENDS OF ROOF TYP.LEFT PROPERTY LINERIGHT PROPERTY LINELEFT SIDE SETBACK LINERIGHT SIDE SETBACK LINEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE(N) DETACHED SINGLE-CAR CAR GARAGE WITH EXTERIOR DETAILING TO MATCH MAIN RESIDENCE (N) FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOW TYP. SEE A5.0 FOR WINDOW SCHEDULE AND A9.0 FOR WINDOW DETAIL (N) WOOD AND GLASS FRONT DOOR AND SIDELITES. SEE A5.0 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE. (N) BASEMENT CLEAR CEILING HEIGHT LESS THAN 6'-0" (N) STONE VENEER ON FRONT OF HOUSE TYP. (N) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO SECOND FLOOR(N) LEFT SIDE SETBACK TO SECOND FLOOR (N) PAINTED WOOD 8" BELLY BAND AND WOOD CORBELS TYP. (N) CEMENTOUS SIDING 8" EXPOSURE TYP. EGRESS WINDOW BEDROOM 1 W/ CLEARANCE OF 27 1/2" X 39 1/2" AND SILL AT 38" (N) 4" WOOD CORNER BOARD FOR SIDING TYP. (E) SINGLE PANE WOOD WINDOW TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD CORBEL TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 4/19/2019 Response to Planning PC2 2 TOS GARAGE +101.60 (E) FIRST FL. F.F. +104.99 (E) FIRST FLOOR T.O. PLATE +113.32 (E) T.O. RIDGE +120.36 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.45 20'-8 1/2"(E) SECOND FLOOR F.F. +108.57 BASEMENT +96.917'-0 1/2"4'-9"3'-7"3'-5"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"7'-0 1/2"8'-4"5'-4 1/4"2'-8 3/4"3" 12"+/- W22 W20 W19 W18 W17 W16 W15 W14 W13 W27 W26 W21 TOS GARAGE +101.60 SECOND FLOOR F.F. +113.99 SECOND FL. T.O. PLATE +121.99 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 T.O. RIDGE +129.08 (N) FIRST FLOOR T.O.PLATE +112.82 BASEMENT +96.917'-1"8'-0"1'-2"9'-0"2'-3"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"15'-1"10'-2"4'-2 1/4"2'-8 3/4"29'-5 1/4"(N) FIRST FL. F.F. +103.82 W52 W50W51 W49 W76 W74 W73 W72 W70W75 6" 12" 33 1/2"45 1/2"D45 W71 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.45 6" 12" AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtA3.1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONS 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION EXISTING 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED (N) WOOD AND GLASS BASEMENT ACCESS DOOR AT GRADE. SEE A5.0 FOR DOOR SCHEDULEFRONT PROPERTY LINEFRONT PROPERTY LINE(E) STUCCO EXTERIOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (N) PAINTED WOOD 8" BELLY BAND AND CORBELS TYP. EGRESS WINDOW GUEST BEDROOM W/ CLEARANCE OF 33 1/2" X 45 1/2" AND SILL AT 36" (E) FRAMING AND COMPOSITION ROOFING TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. 1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS IN PROPOSED ELEVATION ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED AS EXISTING (E) 2. ALL NEW WINDOWS FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOWS WITH SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHTS 3. SEE SHEET A5.0 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE 4. SEE SHEET A9.0 FOR TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHEET NOTES (E) CHIMNEY AND FIREPLACE TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) WOOD REAR DECK AND STAIRS W/ WOOD RAILING (E) COVERED FRONT PORCH AND STAIRS TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) 10" PAINTED WOOD FASCIA TYP. (N) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TYP. (N) HARDIESHINGLE SIDING 6" EXPOSURE TYP. (N) 4" WOOD CORNER BOARD FOR SIDING TYP. (N) FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOW TYP. SEE A5.0 FOR WINDOW SCHEDULE AND A9.0 FOR WINDOW DETAIL (N) CEMENTOUS SIDING 8" EXPOSURE TYP. (E) WOOD WINDOW TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD CORBEL TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 4/19/2019 Response to Planning PC2 (N) WOOD FRONT PORCH W/ STONE VENEER AND (N) WOOD RAILING AND COLUMN W/ WOOD TOP BASE TYP. 2 TOS GARAGE +101.60 SECOND FLOOR F.F. +113.99 SECOND FL. T.O. PLATE +121.99 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 T.O. RIDGE +129.08 29'-5 1/4"(N) FIRST FLOOR T.O.PLATE +112.827'-1"8'-0"1'-2"9'-0"2'-3"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"BASEMENT +96.912'-8 3/4" 4'-2 1/4"10'-2"15'-1"(N) FIRST FL. F.F. +103.827'-6"7'-6"11'-5" 10'-2" 9'-11" D24 W47 W46W48 W68W69 W45 W43W44 W40W41W42 W67 W66 W65 AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE +100.74 +101.1112'-0"12'-0"4'-6" 6" 12" 6" 12" TOS GARAGE +101.60 (E) FIRST FL. F.F. +104.99 (E) FIRST FLOOR T.O. PLATE +113.32 (E) T.O. RIDGE +120.36 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.6520'-8 1/2"2'-8 3/4" 1'-11 1/4" 3'-5" 3'-7"4'-9"7'-0 1/2"(E) SECOND FLOOR F.F. +108.57 BASEMENT +96.912'-8 3/4" 5'-4 1/4"8'-4"7'-0 1/2"AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE AVG. (E) GRADE ELEVATION ON PROPERTY LINE +100.74 +101.1112'-0"12'-0"2'-11 1/2" 20'-2" 3" 12" 3" 12" +/- +/- W9W10 D14 W11W12 D15 3 AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtA3.2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED NORTH (REAR) ELEVATIONS 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"1 NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION PROPOSED 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"2 NORTH (REAR) ELEVATION EXISTINGRIGHT PROPERTY LINELEFT PROPERTY LINE (E) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD DOOR FOR BASEMENT ACCESS TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) PAINTED WOOD AND GLASS DOOR. SEE A5.0 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE. (E) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (N) LEFT SIDE SETBACK FIRST FLOOR (E) LEFT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (N) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO FIRST FLOOR (E) WOOD AND GLASS EXTERIOR DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED 1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS IN PROPOSED ELEVATION ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED AS EXISTING (E) 2. ALL NEW WINDOWS ARE FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOWS WITH SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHTS 3. SEE SHEET A5.0 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE 4. SEE SHEET A9.0 FOR TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHEET NOTES RIGHT SIDE SETBACK LINELEFT SIDE SETBACK LINE(E) STUCCO EXTERIOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) CARPORT AND STUCCO COLUMNS TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) CHIMNEY AND FIREPLACE TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) STUCCO COLUMNS AND (E) BEDROOM ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) 4" CORNER BOARD AT SIDING TYP.DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE(N) 8" PAINTED WOOD BELLY BAND AND CORBELS TYP. (N) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TYP. (N) HARDIESHINGLE SIDING 6" EXPOSURE TYP. (N) VERTICAL CEMENTOUS SIDING W/ 6-INCH EXPOSURE TYP. (N) TRIANGULAR RIDGE VENT ON GABLE ENDS OF ROOF TYP.DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPEDECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE(N) FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOW TYP. SEE A5.0 FOR WINDOW SCHEDULE AND A9.0 FOR WINDOW DETAIL (N) WOOD REAR DECK AND STAIRS W/ WOOD RAILING (N) LEFT SIDE SETBACK TO SECOND FLOOR (N) RIGHT SIDE SETBACK TO SECOND FLOOR (N) 10" PAINTED WOOD FASCIA TYP.RIGHT PROPERTY LINELEFT PROPERTY LINE RIGHT SIDE SETBACK LINELEFT SIDE SETBACK LINE(N) CEMENTOUS SIDING 8" EXPOSURE TYP. (E) VINYL WINDOW TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD CORBEL TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 (N) BAY WINDOW AT DINING ROOM W/ PAINTED WOOD PANELING TOS GARAGE +101.60 SECOND FLOOR F.F. +113.99 SECOND FL. T.O. PLATE +121.99 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 T.O. RIDGE +129.08 29'-5 1/4"(N) FIRST FLOOR T.O.PLATE +112.827'-1"8'-0"1'-2"9'-0"2'-3"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"15'-1"10'-2"4'-2 1/4"2'-8 3/4"BASEMENT +96.91 (N) FIRST FL. F.F. +103.82 W34 W33W36W37W38W35 W60W61W62 6" 12" W64 W63 W39 27 1/2"42 1/2"W59 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.50 6" 12" TOS GARAGE +101.60 (E) FIRST FL. F.F. +104.99 (E) FIRST FLOOR T.O. PLATE +113.32 (E) T.O. RIDGE +120.36 AVG. TOC CHANNING +99.65 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.50 (E) SECOND FLOOR F.F. +108.57 BASEMENT +96.9120'-8 1/2"7'-0 1/2"4'-9"3'-7"3'-5"1'-11 1/4"2'-8 3/4"7'-0 1/2"8'-4"8'-1"W3W4W5W6W7W8 W28 W26 AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtA3.3 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WEST ELEVATIONS 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED 0'4'8'2'1/4" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION EXISTING FRONT PROPERTY LINEFRONT PROPERTY LINE(E) COVERED FRONT PORCH AND STAIRS TO BE DEMOLISHED 1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS IN PROPOSED ELEVATION ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED AS EXISTING (E) 2. ALL NEW WINDOWS ARE FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOWS WITH SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHTS 3. SEE SHEET A5.0 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE 4. SEE SHEET A9.0 FOR TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHEET NOTES (E) VINYL WINDOW TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) PAINTED WOOD CORBEL TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) STUCCO EXTERIOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. (E) FRAMING AND COMPOSITION ROOFING TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) CHIMNEY AND FIREPLACE TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) BAY WINDOW IN DINING ROOM W/ PAINTED WOOD PANELING AND DECORATIVE WOOD CORBELS BELOW (E) STUCCO COLUMNS AND (E) BEDROOM ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED (E) CARPORT AND STUCCO COLUMNS TO BE DEMOLISHED (N) WOOD REAR DECK AND STAIRS W/ WOOD RAILING (N) COMPOSITION ROOFING AND FRAMING TYP.(N) HARDIESHINGLE SIDING 6" EXPOSURE TYP. (N) WOOD FRONT PORCH W/ STONE VENEER AND (N) COLUMN W/ WOOD TOP AND WOOD BASE TYP. (N) FIBERGLASS CLAD WOOD WINDOW TYP. SEE A5.0 FOR WINDOW SCHEDULE AND A9.0 FOR WINDOW DETAIL (N) STONE VENEER W/ WOOD WATER TABLE ON FRONT OF HOUSE TYP. (N) CEMENTOUS SIDING 8" EXPOSURE TYP. (N) 4" CORNER BOARD AT SIDING TYP. (N) EGRESS WINDOW MASTER BEDROOM W/ CLEARANCE OF 27 1/2" X 42 1/2" AND SILL AT 32" (N) 8" PAINTED WOOD BELLY BAND AND CORBELS TYP. (N) 10" PAINTED WOOD FASCIA TYP. Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 UP DN DN DN OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO50'-0" N 83' - 11 11/32"E -10' - 9 21/32" N 58' - 10 27/32"E -53' - 11 5/ 32" N -40' - 10"E 3' - 5 3/4" N -15' - 8 23/32"E 46' - 8 15/ 32"15'-0"15'-0"115'-0"20'-0"20'-0"4'-0"4'-0"3'-0"5'-0"2'-0"10'-0"S N -24' - 5 25/32"E 51' - 8 5/16" N -49' - 6 5/32"E 8' - 5 7/8" FRONT PORCH REAR DECK GARAGE W +101.72 REAR PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.50 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +99.79 T.O.C. ELEVATION +99.50 T.O.C. ELEVATION +101.02 REAR PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION +100.45 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATIONCLOSETDINING AREA FAMILY ROOM KITCHEN BUTLER PANTRY LIVING ROOM FOYER GUEST BEDROOM POWDER GUEST BATH COATS STAIRS E G (E) TREE (E) SHADE BUSH W/ DIAMETER LESS THAN 6" SHRUBBERY ANNUALS (N) TREE SOFTSCAPE CONCRETE LANDSCAPING LEGEND AS NOTED 36"x 24" SCALE DATE FORMAT C DESIGNER Wehmeyer Design Robert Wehmeyer, PBD AIBD rob@rcwehmeyer.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR Wehmeyer Custom Homes CSLB #969354 rob@rcwehmeyer.com RESIDENCE APN CLIENT 2019 RCW DESIGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NOTES: Revisions RC Wehmeyer I Design I Build 1204 Burlingame Avenue, Suite No. 7 Burlingame, CA 94010 650.340.1055 www.rcwehmeyer.com No. Date Description C:\Users\Katrina\Desktop\Server Files\1804_Niyogi_217_Channing\02 - Revit Drawings Working\Niyogi_217_Channing.rvtL1.1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 217 Channing Road Somrat & Sarah Niyogi 217 Channing Road 029-262-090 (415) 318-9718 Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 NIYOGI 4/19/2019 0'8'16'4'1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE- THESE PLANS COMPLY WITH THE CITERIA OF THE WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN. SHEET NOTES (E) SOFTSCAPE SIDE YARD TO REMAIN TYP. (N) SEMI- PERMEABLE HARDSCAPE SCAPE AREA TO BE EXPANDED TO MATCH (E)PROJECT NORTHTR UE N O RTH (N) SOFTSCAPE/ PLANTER AREA (N) BASEMENT ACCESS DOOR AT GRADE (N) SEMI-PERMEABLE HARDSCAPE APPROACH TO FRONT PORCH (E) WOOD FENCE (E) SHURBBERY TO BE REHABILITATED CHANNING ROAD 217 CHANNING ROAD EXISTING 1-STORY RESIDENCE FIRST FLOOR REAR SETBACK LINE FIRST FLOOR FRONT SETBACK LINE FRONT PROPERTY LINE REAR PROPERTY LINE SECOND FLOOR FRONT SETBACK LINE SECOND FLOOR REAR SETBACK LINE CITY RIGHT OF WAYLEFT PROPERTY LINERIGHT PROPERTY LINELEFT SIDE SETBACK LINERIGHT SIDE SETBACK LINE(N) 24" BOX JAPANESE MAPLE TREE SPECIES (N) SINGLE-CAR GARAGE PROVIDING COVERED PARKING WITH INTERIOR CLEAR DIMENSIONS 10'-0" x 20'-0" (E) LAWN (N) 24" BOX JAPANESE MAPLE TREE SPECIES (E) LAWN (N) MANUAL WOOD GATE (E) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SERVING AS UNCOVERED PARKING SPACE WITH APPROX DIM. 10'-2" X 21'-6" +/-TO REMAIN (E) CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVE APPROCH TO REMAIN (E) WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN TYP. (E) SHADE PLANTING ON PROPERTY LINE (N) MANUAL WOOD GATE (E) POWER POLE TO REMAIN Issue Date Description 12/19/2018 Planning Department Submittal 3/19/2019 Response to Planning PC1 (E) 30"+/- DEODAR CEDAR TREE ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY W/ OVERHANG ONTO SUBJECT PROPERTY TO REMAIN. SEE TREE PROTECTION PLAN (E) 17" SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA CITY STREET TREE TO REMAIN TYP. SEE TREE PROTECTION PLAN (E) 8 1/2" PITTOSPORUM TREE TO REMAIN (E) 16 1/2" SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA CITY STREET TREE TO REMAIN. SEE TREE PROTECTION PLAN. (E) 21 1/2" SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA CITY STREET TREE TO REMAIN TYP. SEE L1.1 FOR TREE PROTECTION PLAN PROJECT LOCATION 1543 Cypress Avenue Item No. 9b Design Review Study City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1543 Cypress Avenue Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling with an existing detached garage. Applicant and Architect: Christian Ruffat, Residential Design Solutions APN: 028-301-220 Property Owners: Alicia Sanguinetti Lot Area: 5,987 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Background: The subject property is located within the Burlingame Park subdivision. Based upon documents that were submitted to the Planning Division by a Burlingame property owner in 2009, it was indicated that the entire Burlingame Park No. 2, Burlingame Park No. 3, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park subdivisions may have historical characteristics that would indicate that properties within this area could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, for any property located within these subdivisions, a Historic Resource Evaluation must be prepared prior to any significant development project being proposed to assess whether the existing structure(s) could be potentially eligible for listing on the National or California Register of Historical Places. A Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for this property by Page & Turnbull, Inc., dated April 16, 2019 (attached). The results of the evaluation concluded that 1543 Cypress Avenue is eligible for individual listing on the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 3 (Architecture). The evaluation notes that “the Craftsman style building does possess high artistic value and reflects key Craftsman features including a low - pitched gabled roof, overhanging eaves, exposed wooden structural elem ents (rafters at soffits), front porch, dormer, exterior chimney, double-hung wood windows with multi-lite upper sashes, and a fixed window with decorative mullion border. The building’s original carport is highly reflective of the era of construction and is a unique design feature in the Burlingame Park neighborhood. The detached garage, which features decorative braces under the gable and a stucco cross motif, is a related feature and contributor to the house’s significance, since it is a highly intact support structure that was likely constructed at the same time.” Once comments are provided by the Planning Commission on the proposed project, Page & Turnbull will prepare an analysis of the potential impacts of the proposed addition under the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and pursuant to CEQA. Project Description: The existing house is located on an interior lot and contains 2,675 SF (0.44 FAR) of floor area. The proposed project includes a first and second story addition that would increase the floor area to 3,182 SF (0.53 FAR) where 3,269 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed. Inclusion of the existing attached carport at the front of the house would exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage and floor area, and therefore, the applicant proposes to remove the carport for compliance. The proposed project is 87 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The existing house contains four bedrooms and with the proposed project the number of bedrooms wouldn’t change. For a four-bedroom house, two parking spaces are required, one of which must be covered. The existing one-car detached garage would maintain a 13’-4” x 17’-5” clear area, where 9’-0” x 17’-0” is allowed for an existing one car garage that is not being altered. One uncovered parking space 9’-0” x 20’-0” is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the off-street parking requirements. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant request s the following application:  Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (existing detached garage to remain) (CS 25.57.010 (a) (2)) Item No. 9b Design Review Study Design Review 1543 Cypress Avenue 2 1543 Cypress Avenue Lot Size: 5,987 SF Plans date stamped: May 9, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ’D SETBACKS Front (1st flr): Dormer (1st flr) 19’-7” n/a No change 19’-11” 15’-0” or block average (19-11’) (2nd flr): n/a 32’-3” 20’-0” Side (left): Side (right): 4’-5” 2’-6”1 13’-2” no change 4'-0" 4'-0" Rear (1st flr): (2nd flr): 20’-4” n/a 27’-0” 44’-1” 15'-0" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 2,811 SF 2 46.9% 2,242 SF 37.4% 2,395 SF 40% FAR: 2,675 SF 0.44 FAR 3,182 SF 0.53 FAR 3,269 SF 3 0.54 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 4 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered space in garage (13’-4” x 17’-5”) 1 uncovered (9’-0” x 20’-0”) 1 covered space in garage (13’-4” x 17’-5”) 1 uncovered (9’-0” x 20’-0”) 1 covered (9’-0” x 17’-0” for existing) 1 uncovered (9'-0” x 20'-0”) Building Height: 18’-7” 27’-9” 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 ¹ Existing nonconforming side yard setback. 2 Existing nonconforming lot coverage . 3 (0.32 x 5,987 SF) + 1100 SF + 253 SF = 3,269 SF (0.54 FAR) Staff Comments: No comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Sonal Aggarwal Contract Planner c. Christian Ruffat, Residential Design Solutions, applicant and architect Alicia Sanguinetti, property owner Design Review 1543 Cypress Avenue 3 Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed May 17, 2019 Area Map Separate Attachments: Historic Resource Evaluation conducted by Page & T urnbull, Inc., dated April 16, 2019 DPR 523A *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code 3CS Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page 1 of 20 Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County San Mateo *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad San Mateo, Calif. Date 1999 *c. Address 1543 Cypress Avenue City Burlingame Zip 94010 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone , mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 028-301-220 *P3a. Description: 1543 Cypress Avenue is located on a rectangular lot of 6,000 square feet on the east side of Cypress Avenue, between El Camino Real (north) and Barroilhet Avenue (south), in the Burlingame Park neighborhood (Figure 1). Research did not uncover an original building permit nor information about an original architect or builder. The municipal water tap record for 1543 Cypress Avenue indicates the subject building was constructed in 1918. 1543 Cypress Avenue is a 2,120-square-foot one-story wood-frame residence designed in the Craftsman style. The stucco and drop channel wood-clad building sits on a concrete foundation and features a composite-shingle complex roof form (primarily cross-gable). The building features overhanging eaves with wood soffits and exposed rafter tails. The building is primarily rectilinear in plan with a north carport wing. The side-gabled front volume features a central dormer and a chimney at the south gable peak; the chimney features a gabled chimney cap. All doors throughout the building are wood, and windows are wood, aluminum, or vinyl. Unless otherwise specified in the building description, typical windows are wood. Window configurations include fixed, double hung, single hung, sliding, and casement. An attached gabled carport extends northeast over the scored concrete driveway, which provides access to a detached garage at the northeast corner of the property. (See Continuation Sheet, page 2.) *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property; HP4: Ancillary building (detached garage) *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other P5b. Photo: (view and date) View east of the primary (northwest) façade, April 16, 2019. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1918 (municipal water tap record) *P7. Owner and Address: Alicia Sanguinetti 1543 Cypress Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 *P8. Recorded by: Page & Turnbull, Inc. 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 *P9. Date Recorded: 4/16/2019 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none”) None *Attachments: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (list) P5a. Photo State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 2 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L *P3a. Description (continued): The stucco-clad primary (northwest) façade of 1543 Cypress Avenue looks onto a small front yard and Cypress Avenue beyond. The far left (north) portion of the primary façade features a carport that extends across the driveway (Error! Reference source not found.). The carport features molded archways and is supported by four pillars. One pillar is attached to the main building volume, and all pillars feature decorative molding with triangular dentils. The main building volume features a recessed, partially enclosed porch bounded with a capped half-wall and accessed via three concrete steps (Figure 3). The porch features molded archways and decorative molding with triangular dentils continued from the carport. The left (north) portion of the porch is deeply recessed and contains northwest-facing and northeast-facing double-hung windows, each featuring multi-lite upper sashes. The northeast portion of the porch half-wall features a carport access opening (Figure 4). The right (south) portion of the porch is slightly recessed and contains the building’s paneled wood primary entrance door, flanked with narrow sidelights. The sidelights featu re interior lead tracery. Right (south) of the porch is a large fixed picture window with decorative mullion border (Figure 5). The primary façade features a central dormer with a shed roof, exposed rafter tails, and three hopper windows (Figure 6). Figure 1: Aerial photograph of 1543 Cypress Avenue. Approximate boundary of subject property outlined in orange. Source: Google Maps, 2019. Edited by Page & Turnbull. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 3 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 2: Carport at north portion of primary façade, view southeast. Figure 3: Front porch and primary entrance, view southeast. Figure 4: Front porch, view southwest from carport. Figure 5: Fixed picture window, view northeast. Figure 6: Central dormer window, view southeast. The southwest façade looks onto a narrow pathway and the neighboring building at 1547 Cypress Avenue. The left (west) gabled portion features an exterior chimney that extends above the roofline and features a n ornamental cross motif and a birdhouse-style cap (Figure 7 and Figure 8). East of the chimney, the façade features an aluminum-frame single-hung window, a projecting bay with a horizontally-oriented fixed window, an aluminum-frame single-hung window, and an aluminum-frame sliding window. The rear portion of the southwest façade slightly projec ts from the main building volume; a northwest-facing wood-frame partially-glazed State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 4 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L door located mid-façade and accessed via four concrete steps (Figure 9). The gabled rear portion of the façade features a multi- lite fixed window and an aluminum-frame single-hung window (Figure 10). The far rear portion of the southwest façade features drop channel wood cladding and an aluminum-frame single-hung window, a vinyl-frame single-hung window, and a double-hung window (Figure 11). The rear (southeast) façade looks onto a small rear patio. A corrugated polycarbonate shed roof projects over a porch with a cross- frame wood railing and two sets of wood steps (Figure 12 and Figure 14). From left (south) to right (north), the drop channel wood-clad rear façade features a multi-lite fixed window, a small single-hung window, a wood door, and paired two-lite vertically- oriented windows. Figure 7. Chimney with cross motif, view northwest. Figure 8. Chimney cap, view southeast. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 5 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 9. Front and central portions of southwest façade, view southeast. Figure 10. Gabled rear portion of southwest façade, view northeast. Figure 11: Drop channel wood-clad far rear portion of southwest façade, view northwest. Figure 12: Rear façade, view northwest. Figure 13: Rear façade, view southwest. The drop channel wood-clad far rear portion of the northeast façade looks onto the concrete tile and pebbled driveway. This sl ightly recessed far rear volume features two aluminum-frame sliding windows (Figure 14). The stucco-clad primary building volume features a southeast-facing wood-frame multi-lite door, accessed via five wood steps. The central portion of the northeast façade features a full-height, tripartite, multi-lite fixed window configuration, a vinyl-frame single-hung window, a small casement window, and a double-hung window (Figure 15). The front portion of the façade includes the aforementioned carport and front porch. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 6 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 14: Far rear portion of the northeast façade, view southwest. Figure 15: Central portion of the northeast façade, view west. A detached garage is located at the northeast corner of the subject lot. The structure features a composite shingle gabled roof and stucco cladding. The primary northwest façade features wood barn doors and a molded stucco cross motif; the gable features projecting rafter tails and simple wood trim (Figure 16). The southwest façade looks onto the rear patio and features a wood door (Figure 17). The small front yard features a grass lawn, concrete walkway, and hedge plantings (Figure 18 and Figure 19). Wood gates provide access to the side and rear areas of the property (Figure 20 and Figure 21). Privacy fences (wood, concrete block, and/or corrugated polycarbonate, some heavily vegetated) extend across much of the side and rear property lines (Error! Reference source not found.). The concrete-tile rear patio features several small trees (Figure 23). The subject property is on a flat, isosceles trapezoid-shaped block bounded by Cypress Avenue (west), Carol Avenue (northeast and east), and Barroilhet Avenue (southeast), within the Burlingame Park neighborhood south of downtown Burlingame. The neighborhood contains homes built in Craftsman and revival styles, primarily from the 1910s through the 1920s (Figure 24 to Figure 28). The residential buildings on the lots to the immediate left (north) and right (south) of 1543 Cypress Avenue were constructed in 1916 and 1918, respectively. Based on the 1921 Sanborn Map Company fire insurance map, the central portion of the east block face of Cypress Avenue between El Camino Real/Carol Avenue and Barroilhet Avenue were developed with one or one-story residences by 1921 (Figure 30).1 Figure 16. Detached garage, looking southwest. Figure 17. Detached garage, looking northwest. 1 In 1921, the east block face of Cypress Avenue featured 11 lots; the subject block face now features 14 lots. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 7 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 18: Front yard, view northeast. Figure 19: Hedge fronting public sidewalk, view south. Figure 20: Wood carport gate at northeast property line, view southeast. Figure 21: Wood gate at southwest property line, view southeast. Figure 22: Wood fencing at carport, view northeast. Figure 23: Wood fencing at rear patio, view east. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # __________________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _____________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial __________________________________________________ Page 8 of 20 Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 24. 1541 Cypress Avenue, located left (north) of the subject property, built in 1916. Figure 25. 1547 Cypress Avenue, located right (south) of the subject property, built in 1918. Figure 26: 1544 Cypress Avenue, located directly across from the subject property, built in 1916. Figure 27. 1548 Cypress Avenue, located across from the subject property, built in 1927. Figure 28: 1536 Cypress Avenue, located across and north of the subject property, built in 1922 (appears heavily altered). DPR 523B *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________ BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 9 of 20 *NRHP Status Code 3CS *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 1543 Cypress Avenue B1. Historic name: 1543 Cypress Avenue B2. Common name: 1543 Cypress Avenue B3. Original Use: Single-Family Residence B4. Present use: Single-Family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman *B6. Construction History: 1543 Cypress Avenue was connected to the municipal water system on April 30, 1918 (Figure 29). Research did not uncover an original building permit or information about an architect or builder. Research did not uncover any (non-aerial) historic photographs of the building. The first Sanborn Map Company fire insurance map to depict the subject property was published in 1921. Based on the 1921 Sanborn map, it appears as though the carport is an original feature , as well as the detached garage at the northeast corner of the property (Figure 30). A permit application from 1927 indicates the construction of a rear addition, and a permit application from 1930 indicates the construction of a garage addition. An aerial photograph taken in 1941 depicts a half - width rear addition and depicts a garage addition (Figure 31). The 1921-1949 Sanborn map mirrors the 1921 Sanborn map; based on the 1941 aerial photograph, the 1921-1949 Sanborn map does not depict 1949 conditions (Figure 32). An aerial photograph taken in 1956 depicts a full-width rear addition; this expansion of the rear addition is not reflected in the permit history (Figure 33). Remaining permits relate to furnace, sewer, ground sandblasting, and electric work (See Continuation Sheet, page 10, for a summary table of the permits). *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: Architect unknown b. Builder: Builder unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area Burlingame Park Period of Significance 1918 Property Type Single-family residence Applicable Criteria 3 (Architecture) Historic Context: City of Burlingame The lands that would become the City of Burlingame were initially part of Rancho San Mateo, a Mexican-era land grant given to Cayetano Arena by Governor Pio Pico in 1845. Over the next four decades, the lands passed through the hands of several prominent San Francisco businessmen, including William Howard (purchased 1848) and William C. Ralston (purchased 1856). In 1866, Ralston sold over 1,000 acres to Anson Burlingame, the US Minister to China. Following Burlingame’s death in 1870, the land reverted to Ralston and eventually to Ralston’s business partner, William Sharon. Very little formal development occurred during this period, with most of the land used for dairy and stock farm o perations. In 1893, William Sharon’s trustee, Francis G. Newlands, proposed the development of the Burlingame Country Club as an exclusive semi-rustic destination for wealthy San Franciscans. A railroad depot was constructed in 1894, concurrent with small -scale subdivisions in the vicinity of Burlingame Avenue. During this time, El Camino Real acted as a de facto dividing line between large country estates to the west and the small village of Burlingame to the east. The latter developed almost exclusively t o serve the needs of the wealthy estate owners. Burlingame began to develop in earnest with the arrival of an electric streetcar line between San Mateo and San Francisco in 1903. However, the 1906 earthquake and fires had a far more dramatic impact on the area. Hundreds of San Franciscans who had lost their homes began relocating to Burlingame, which boomed with the construction of new residences and businesses. Over the next two years, the village’s population grew from 200 to 1,000. In 1908, Burlingame incorporated as a city, and in 1910, annexed the north adjacent town of Easton. The following year, the Burlingame Country Club area was also annexed to the City. By 1920, Burlingame’s population had increased to 4,107.2 (See Continuation Sheet, page 10). B11. Additional Resource Attributes: *B12. References: See Continuation Sheet, page 15. B13. Remarks: None *B14. Evaluator: Katherine Wallace, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date of Evaluation: April 16, 2019 2 Joanne Garrison, Burlingame: Centennial 1908-2008 (Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 2007). Source: San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder, 2019. Property highlighted orange. Modified by Page & Turnbull (This space reserved for official comments.) State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 10 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L *B6. Construction History (continued): Building permit applications on file for 1543 Cypress Avenue at the Burlingame Community Development Department are listed below: Date Permit # Architect/Builder/Contractor Owner Listed Description 10/24/1927 1101 Dittam W.L. Roberts Addition - plumbing and electric 11/21/1930 1960 None listed Chicester Addition to garage 10/5/1970 Illegible B.B. Stern Co. Ira M. Belden Floor furnace 2/27/1974 I1660 Bayshore Plumbing Ira Belden Sewer 9/14/1978 Z21 G.C. Johnson Sandblasting Clark Sandblast walk and drive cement 6/13/1991 5884230 Kemper Electric None listed Upgrade service to 100amps 8/22/1997 970367 Regan William Construction Carolyn M. Clark Water heater/sewer repair 10/25/2013 P13-0165 A Miracle Plumbing Carol M. Clark Break up 6’ long x 36” wide of concrete public sidewalk to replace 9’ of sewer with cast iron sewer pipe Visual observation suggests that unpermitted exterior alterations have been made to the property. A number of wood windows at the secondary southwest and northeast façades (at both the original 1918 building volume and the rear addition) have been replaced with aluminum or vinyl windows. Although permit history specifies a rear addition was constructed in 1927, aerial photographs indicate the 1927 rear addition only spanned half of the rear façade, and a full -width addition was completed at an unknown date between 1941 and 1956. The garage addition, constructed in 1930, appears to have been removed quite recently. Google Maps aerial imagery from May 2018 depicts the garage addition extending in the southwest direction; however, the garage addition had been demolished by the time of Page & Turnbull’s site visit in April 2019. *B10. Significance (continued): Burlingame Park Neighborhood The subject property was constructed in the Burlingame Park neighborhood, one of three subdivisions (including Burlingame Heights and Glenwood Park) created from lands that were part of the San Mateo Rancho. William C. Ralston, having reacquired the property following Burlingame’s death, began to develop plans for a residential park in this area as early as 1873. Initially, Ralston hired William Hammond Hall to draw up a plan for an exclusive residential development to be called Burlingame Park. Hall’s early plan was never realized, but work began on the residential development in the 1890s under Francis Newlands. Newlands commissioned Hall’s cousin, Richard Pindell Hammond, Jr., to draw up a new plan for the subdivision. The plan “centered on a communal country club and featured winding tree-lined roads, ample lots, and polo fields for the residents.”3 The land was subdivided, and the streets were laid out in May 1905 by Davenport Bromfield and Antoine Borel. The residential neighborhood is located in close proximity to the Burlingame Country Club and the neighborhood was officially annexed to the City of Burlingame in 1911.4 Burlingame Park, Burlingame Heights, and Glenwood Park were the earliest planned residential developments in Burlingame and were followed by Burlingame Terrace, Burlingame Grove, Burlingame Villa Park, and Easton. Burlingame Park is bounded by County Road to the north; Burlingame Park, Crescent, and Barroilhet avenues to the east; Pepper Avenue to the south; and Bellevue Avenue to the west. Sanborn Map Company fire insurance maps indicate that Burlingame Park developed over a period of about 50 years. The town of Burlingame experienced a residential building boom in the early 1920s and the majority of residences within the Burlingame Park neighborhood were constructed in the 1920s and 1930s. Today, the neighborhood represents the progressive development of the subdivision from the time it was first laid out in 1905, through the early twentieth century building boom, to the present day. In terms of architecture, most of the homes in the neighborhood are some variation of Craftsman or various revival styles. 1543 Cypress Avenue Owner and Occupant History 1543 Cypress Avenue was constructed in 1918 for original owners Clyde T. and Lillian M. Chicester. Clyde was born in California in 1883 and worked as an accountant. Lillian was born in 1886 in Canada. The Chicesters had two sons, Daniel (born 1911) and John (born 1920), and a daughter, Roberta (born 1908); the family resided at 1543 Cypress Avenue until 1932. Short-term rental 3 Gray Brechin, Imperial San Francisco (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999), 94. 4 Diane Condon-Wirgler, “Burlingame Park, Burlingame Heights, Glenwood Park,” (Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, ca. 2004). State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 11 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L tenants include Richard and Kathleen Appling, who had a son, David, while residing at 1543 Cypress Avenue in 1936.5 Rental tenants Arthur Armitage (born in England in 1875), his wife, Lilly J. (born in England in 1881), and their son, Arthur (born 1905), resided at 1543 Cypress Avenue in 1939 and 1940; Arthur worked as a cashier. The property appears to have been subsequently rented or vacant until 1956, when Ira M. Belden is listed in the city directory as the property owner. Ira and his wife, Emmeline Sophie, had two daughters and a son: Beverly, Bonnie, and Donald. Ira and Emmeline appear to have rented out the property between 1961 and 1967 before moving back into 1543 Cypress Avenue and residing there from 1967 to 1976. Following Emmeline’s death in 1976, Ira sold the property in 1978 to Carolyn M. Clark . Ira M. Belden died in May 1983.6 Clark resided at 1543 Cypress Avenue until at least 2013. The current property owner is Alicia Sanguinetti.7 The following table outlines the ownership and occupancy history of 1543 Cypress Avenue, compiled from Burlingame city directories, Ancestry.com, and City of Burlingame Ownership Cards on file at the Burlingame Historical Society: Years of Ownership/Occupation8 Owners and Tenants (known owners in bold) Occupation (if listed) 1920 - 19329 Clyde T. and Lillian M. Chicester Clyde: Accountant 1932 - 1933 Edward L. and Alberta Mills Unknown 1934 Vacant N/A 1935 John N. and Edith Clark John: Clerk for W.P. Fuller and Co. 1936 - 1938 Richard H. and Kathleen Appling Richard: Clerk for Associated Oil 1939 - 1940 Arthur and Lilly J. Armitage Arthur: Cashier 1941 - 1949 Ira M. and Emmeline Belden Ira: Electrician 1950 - 1951 Donald F. and Marcia Ryder Donald: Chemical Engineer 1952 James C. and May Risner James: Executive Secretary at YMCA 1953 - 1954 William J. and Blanche Varley William: Lt. US Marines 1955 Wayne D. and Betty R. Guthrie Wayne: Embalmer 1956 Ira M. Belden Electrician 1958 Emmeline Belden Unknown 1961 Jean McFarland Teacher at St. Catherine’s School 1963 Jean McFarland and Marjorie McFarland Jean: Cello teacher at St. Catherine’s School. Marjorie: Violin teacher at St. Catherine’s school 1964 Alan P. Beban10 Attorney 1965 Vacant N/A 1967 - 1976 Ira M. and Emmeline Belden Electrician 1977 Ira M. Belden Electrician 1978 - at least 201311 Carolyn M. Clark Unknown June 2018 - present Alicia Sanguinetti Real estate Craftsman Style The Craftsmen style evolved from the English Arts and Crafts Movement and later, the work of innovative American architects working in the Midwest and California, in particular Frank Lloyd Wright and Greene & Greene 12.The Craftsman style was utilized predominantly in residential properties and was dominant from the 1900s to the 1930s. The Craftsman magazine, published in America from 1901 to 1917, helped to disseminate the ideas associated with the style in North America, such as anti -industrialism and emphasis on handcrafted products. The Craftsman style took off in California during the first decade of the twentieth century in response to the work of Greene & Greene in Southern California. Additional influences included Japanese architecture, Swiss chalets, and the indoor/outdoor traditions of the Spanish and Mexican homes of the region.13 5 “Congratulations Are Extended to Richard Applings,” The Times (August 7, 1936), 6. 6 San Mateo County Geneological Society Obituary Index 2016. Accessed April 2019, http://www.smcgs.org/sites/default/files/database_files/Obituary%20Index%202016.pdf 7 Owner and occupant information is based on Burlingame city directories, census records available through Ancestry.com, permit records, and City of Burlingame Ownership Cards on file at the Burlingame Historical Society. 8 Note that length of ownership or occupation may extend beyond the listed dates. However, for the purpose of this table, only the known years of ownership or occupation are included. 9 Note the subject property is not listed in the 1918 city directory, and there is no 1919 city directory. 10 In 1964, Alan P. Beban passed the bar examination while residing at 1543 Cypress Avenue. That summer Mr. and Mrs. Alan Beban had a son. 11 Research did not confirm ownership history between the years 2013 and 2018. 12 Virginia Savage McAlester, “Craftsman: 1905 – 1930,” in A Field Guide to American Houses (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), 568, 578. 13 Rodney Douglas Parker, “The California Bungalow and the Tyrolean Chalet: The Ill-Fated Life of an American Vernacular,” Journal of American Culture 15, vol. 4 (1992): 1. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 12 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Elaborate one-off homes of the wealthy, such as the Gamble House in Pasadena, represent high style examples while rows of more modest bungalows are found throughout California. Craftsman bungalows are typically characterized by low-pitched gabled roofs with wide, unenclosed eave overhangs; decorative beams or braces; exposed rafter tails; tapered square columns or pedestals; and extending porch elements.14 Small-scale, wood-framed Craftsman bungalows could be constructed easily and affordably, which contributed to their popularity in the Bay Area following the 1906 earthquake. 14 McAlester, 568, 578. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 13 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Evaluation: The property at 1543 Cypress Avenue is not currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The building does not appear in the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) as of 2012, indicating that no record of previous survey or evaluation is on file with the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The City of Burlingame does not currently have a register of historic properties beyond the Downtown Specific Plan Draft Inventory of Historic Resources (on which the subject property is not listed). Therefore, the property is not listed locally.15 Criterion A/1 (Events) 1543 Cypress Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1 (Events) for its association with any events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. The residence was constructed in 1918, prior to Burlingame Park’s major wave of development in the 1920s and 1930s. However, 1543 Cypress Avenue was not the earliest on the subject block, nor does its construction appear to be related to subsequent significant patterns of development in the area. Thus, the property does not appear to rise to a level of significance necessary to be individually eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion B/2 (Persons) 1543 Cypress Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2 (Persons). Original owners Clyde and Lillian Chicester resided at 1543 Cypress Avenue until 1932, though they and additional owners and occupants do not appear to have made contributions to local, state, or national history such that the subject property would be found significant under Criterion B/2. Therefore, research indicates that 1543 Cypress Avenue does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B or California Register under Criterion 2. Criterion C/3 (Architecture) 1543 Cypress Avenue does appear to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 3 (Architecture). The residence at 1543 Cypress Avenue was built in 1918 by an unknown architect/builder; thus, 1543 Cypress Avenue cannot be considered the work of a master architect. However, the Craftsman style building does possess high artistic value and reflects key Craftsman features including a low-pitched gabled roof, overhanging eaves, exposed wooden structural elements (rafters at soffits), front porch, dormer, exterior chimney, double-hung wood windows with multi-lite upper sashes, and a fixed window with decorative mullion border. The building’s original carport is highly reflective of the era of construction and is a unique design feature in the Burlingame Park neighborhood. The detached garage, which features decorative braces under the gable and a stucco cross motif, is a related feature and contributor to the house’s significance, since it is a highly intact support structure that wa s likely constructed at the same time. While the property appears eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 3, it does not rise to a level of significance such that it would be eligible for the National Register under Criterion C. The period of significance would be 1918, the year of the building’s construction. Criterion D/4 (Information Potential) The subject property does not appear to be individually eligible under Criterion D/4 as a building that has the potential to provide information important to the prehistory or history of the City of Fremont, state, or nation. It does not appear to feature co nstruction or material types, or embody engineering practices that would, with additional study, provide important information. Page & Turnbull’s evaluation of this property was limited to age-eligible resources above ground and did not involve survey or evaluation of the subject property for the purposes of archaeological information. Character-Defining Features The character-defining features of 1543 Cypress Avenue date to the building’s construction in 1918 and include: • Siting with primary frontage along Cypress Avenue • One-story volume with cross-gabled roof form • Primarily rectilinear footprint, with north carport wing • Stucco siding and ornamental molding with triangular dentils • Primary entrance ensemble, with recessed front porch and paneled door • Original fenestration pattern and materials, including the dormer, the fixed picture window with decorative mullion border, and all remaining wood windows (except for those at the rear addition) • Carport • Low-slung hipped roof with overhanging eaves, exposed rafter tails and wood-paneled soffits • Stucco-clad exterior chimney with stucco cross motif • Detached garage exposed rafter tails and stucco cross motif 15 Carey & Company, “Inventory of Historic Resources: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan,” October 6, 2008. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 14 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Evaluation (integrity): 1543 Cypress Avenue remains situated at its original 1918 location and continues to be located within a residential setting in the Burlingame Park neighborhood. The building’s overall design has been retained since the building’s completion. All known alterations to the subject building have occurred at secondary façades and are not visible from the public right -of-way.16 The building’s original Craftsman design is clearly reflected. The dwelling’s footprint has been expanded at the rear façade (once in 1927, and again between 1941 and 1956). The building retains several original wood-frame windows, particularly at the primary façade. The building also retains its stucco siding, stucco-clad chimney, dormer, front porch, carport, and overhanging eaves. The property retains its original lot size, orientation, and detached garage. Original materials enable the subject building and detached garage to exhibit period workmanship. The subject building retains integrity of feeling and association as an early twentieth-century suburban single-family residence designed in the Craftsman style with high artistic value. Later additions at the rear of the building do not detract from the dwelling’s design nor perceptions of its historic residential function. Overall, the subject property at 1543 Cypress Avenue retains integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling , and association. Conclusion The residence at 1543 Cypress Avenue is individually eligible for listing in the California Register under Criterion 3 (Architecture). The subject building was constructed in 1918 as the Burlingame Park neighborhood developed and was designed/built by an unknown architect/builder. Alterations to the building have not impaired the building’s historic integrity and the building’s Craftsman design remains intact. The California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC) of “3CS” have been assigned to the property, meaning that 1543 Cypress Avenue appears eligible for the California Register as an individual property through survey evaluation.17 This conclusion does not address whether the property would qualify as a contributor to a potential historic district. A cursory inspection of the surrounding area of Burlingame Park reveals a high concentration of early-twentieth-century residences that warrant further study. However, additional research and evaluation of the Burlingame Park neighborhood as a whole would need to be conducted to verify the neighborhood’s eligibility as a historic district. 16 Further inspection would be required to confirm whether the tracery of the primary entrance sidelights is original. However, even if the tracery was added at a later date, the primary façade continues to reflect its original Craftsman design. 17 California State Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation, “Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Directory” (Sacramento, November 2004), 4. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 15 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L *B12. References: Brechin, Gray. Imperial San Francisco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999. Burlingame Community Development Department, Building Permit Records, 1543 Cypress Avenue, Burlingame, CA. Burlingame City Directories, 1920-1980. Available at the Burlingame Public Library. Burlingame Historical Society, City of Burlingame Ownership Cards. California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation. “Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Dir ectory.” Sacramento, November 2004. Carey & Company. “Inventory of Historic Resources: Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan.” Prepared for the City of Burlingame. October 6, 2008. City of Burlingame. “Preliminary Historic Resources Inventory: City of Burlingame.” Reviewed by the Planning Commission. July 26, 1982. Condon-Wirgler, Diane. “Burlingame Park, Burlingame Heights, Glenwood Park.” Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society. ca. 2004. “Explore the History of Burlingame.” Burlingame Historical Society. Accessed April 2019. https://burlingamehistory.org/history-of- burlingame/. Garrison, Joanne. Burlingame: Centennial 1908-2008. Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 2007. McAlester, Virginia & Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2015. San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Assessor Property Maps. — Grantor-Grantee Index. — Property Maps Portal. Accessed April 2019, http://maps.smcgov.org/GE_4_4_0_Html5Viewer_2_5_0_public/?viewer=raster. Sanborn Map Company. Insurance Maps of Burlingame, San Mateo County, California. March 1921 - November 1949. Available through the San Francisco Public Library and Burlingame Historical Society. University of Santa Barbara Library, Special Research Collections. Aerial Photography FrameFinder. https://www.library.ucsb.edu/src/airphotos/aerial-photography-information. Water Tap Record. 1543 Cypress Avenue, Burlingame, CA (April 30, 1918). State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 16 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Historic Maps and Material: Figure 29: Water tap record for 1543 Cypress Avenue, dated April 30, 1918. Source: Burlingame Historical Society. Figure 30: March 1921 Sanborn Map Company fire insurance map. Subject property boundary shaded orange. Source: San Francisco Public Library. Edited by Page & Turnbull. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 17 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 31: 1941 aerial photograph of 1543 Cypress Avenue. Subject property boundary outlined in orange. Source: Aerial photograph of Burlingame, Flight C-6660, Frame 355, Fairchild Aerial Surveys, March 22, 1941. Edited by Page & Turnbull. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 18 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 32: March 1921 - November 1949 Sanborn Map Company fire insurance map. Subject property shaded orange. Source: San Francisco Public Library. Edited by Page & Turnbull. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 19 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 33: 1956 aerial photograph of 1543 Cypress Avenue. Subject property outlined orange. Source: Aerial photograph of Burlingame, Flight GS_VLX, Frame 1-41, U.S. Geological Survey, September 7, 1956. Edited by Page & Turnbull. State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________ Page 20 of 20 Resource Name or # 1543 Cypress Avenue *Recorded by Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date April 16, 2019  Continuation  Update DPR 523L Figure 34: Assessor’s Map, County of San Mateo, California. Subject property shaded orange. Source: San Mateo County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder Property Maps Portal. Edited by Page & Turnbull. THRESHOLD:106.98WOOD FENCEOLD WIRE FENCEFENCE LEANS NORTHOD FENCE 103.05 103.74103.66103.56103.65103.30103.27102.93 102.82 103.21103.17 103.33103.31103.21 103.10 103.05103.22103.16102.73102.62 103.07103.14103.11102.49102.36 80 103 73104.07103.96103.98103.67103.58103.57103.50103.68103.70103.71104.15104.11104.18103.87103.93104.30104.18103.95103.93103.46103.01103.16103.21103.08103.321 0 3 .51103.14103.30103.91103.93104.04106.62106.98103.98103.83103.84103.94103.85103.82103.98103.84103.40102.86103.34 102.91103.52103.47103.63104.16103.59103.63103.54103.56103.45103.87103.47103.46103.60103.42103.42103.80103.41103.73103.58103.58103.43103.60103.58103.52103.62103.56103.61104.21103.69103.97104.05104.04103.89103.81103.72103.49103.56103.49103.38103.39103.26103.44103.53103.42103.45103.61106.80106.81103.59103.75103.74103.44103.72106.99103.07 102.58 102.65 102.63102.58 0.00104.57103.44103.56112.37109.41WMJPWVSSSSSSSSSSSSSSO/HO/HO/HO/HO/HO/H4"PVCINV:102.54SSWWWWWWWCOC/OSSCOO/HE+TO/HTG7"TREE8"TREE HEDGE HEDGELAWNLAWN6"TREECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE PATHWOODPORCHCONCRETE SQUARESW/ GRAVELWOOD RET.WALLWOOD RET.WALLCONC BLOCK WALL6'± HIGHWIDTH = .6CONCRETE DRIVEWAYCONCRETE PATHCONC BORDER CONTINUES EASTCONC PILLAR(TYP)SIDE WA LKSIDEWALK(.5 WIDE)S72°00'17"E119.74'N17°59'33"E 50.01'S72°00'17"E119.72'N17°58'00"E 50.01'SETSCRIBED+SETSCRIBED+SETSCRIBED+SETSCRIBED+SETSCRIBED+xxxxxxxxxxxDNUPTHRESHOLD:106.98WOOD FENCEOLD WIRE FENCEFENCE LEANS NORTHOD FENCE WMJPWVO/HO/HO/HO/HO/HO/HO/H4"PVCINV:102.54SSWWWWWWWCOC/OSSCOO/HE+TO/HTG7"TREE8"TR EE 18"TREE HEDGE HEDGELAWNLAWN6"TREECONCRETECONCRETECONCRETE PATHWOODPORCHCONCRETE SQUARESW/ GRAVELWOOD RET.WALLWOOD RET.WALLCONC BLOCK WALL6'± HIGHWIDTH = .6CONCRETE DRIVEWAYCONCRETE PATHCONC BORDER CONTINUES EASTCONC PILLAR(TYP)SI DEWALKSIDEWALK(.5 WIDE)S72°00'17"E119.74'N17°59'33"E 50.01'S72°00'17"E119.72'N17°58'00"E 50.01'xxxxxxxxxxxDNUP7' - 7" +-103.9315' - 0"103.7415' - 0"103.4915' - 0"103.8015' - 0"102.82102.58102.70AVG. T.O.GRADEUPPER LEVEL ADDITION(E) CARPORTTO BE REMOVED(E) BUILDINGWALLS AND FOUNDATIONTO BE REMOVED SEE SHT. A327' - 0" PROPOSED16' - 9" PROPOSEDFIRST FLOOR SETBACK15' - 0"SECOND FLOOR SETBACK20' - 0"PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SETBACK32' - 3" +20' - 0"28" x 28" FLAT T.GL.LOW E SL.PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SETBACK44' - 1" +-9' - 10" +-(E) MAIN FLOOR SETBACKPROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SETBACK14" - 6" +-(E) ROOFBELOW(N) ROOFDORMER253.24 SF(E) SIDE SETBACK2' - 6" +-(E) SIDE SETBACK2' - 1" +-(E) REAR SETABCK1' - 9" +-(E) SETBACK4' - 5" +-PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SETBACK11' - 10" +-(E) MAIN FLOOR SETBACK19' - 7"+-111(E) MAIN FLOOR SETBACK20' - 4" +-PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR SETBACK36' - 6" +-1PROPOSED (N) DORMER SETBACK19' - 11"16" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"(E) 6' WD. FENCE(E) 6' + CMUFENCE(E) 6' FENCE(E) WD. LANDSCAPEWALLS TO BE REMOVED(E) GARAGEADJ. HOUSEADJ. HOUSETREE OVERHANG(E) 7" ELMEXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT TO BE RE-USEDREPAIR OR REPLACE CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKETC. AS PER CITY STANDARDS(E) DRIVEWAY AND APPROACHAS PER LANDSCAPE PLANSANY DRIVEWAY APPROACHESTO BE REPAIRED ORCONSTRUCTED PER PWDEPARTMENT DETAILSALL WATER CONNECTIONSTO CITY WATER MAINSFOR SERVICE OR FIRE LINEARE TO BE INSTALLED PERCITY STANDARD PROCEDURESAND SPECIFICATION, ANDANY OTHER UNDERGROUNDUTILITY WORKSWITHIN CITY'S R.O.W.GOVERNING CODES:2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE,2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE,2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, INCLUDING ALL AMENDMENTS ASADOPTED IN ORDINANCE 1889.BRICK BORDERPROPOSED UNCOVEREDSTALL 9'X20'20' - 0"9' - 0"SIDE PORCH STAIR4' - 1" +TO PORCH COL.13' - 2" +-AC UNITS:EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED MAX. OUTDOORNOISE LEVEL OF 60 dba DAYTIME(7:00 AM-10:00 PM) OR50 dba NIGHTTIME (10:00 PM - 7:00 AM) AS MEASUREDFROM THE PROPERTY LINE BMC 25.58.050103.9315' - 0"103.7415' - 0"103.4915' - 0"103.8015' - 0"102.82102.58102.70AVG. T.O.GRADE(E) CARPORTTO BE REMOVED(E) BUILDINGWALLS AND FOUNDATIONTO BE REMOVED SEE SHT. A316' - 9" PROPOSED20' - 0"(E) ROOFBELOW253.24 SF(E) SIDE SETBACK2' - 5 13/16"(E) SIDE SETBACK2' - 0 25/32"(E) REAR SETABCK1' - 8 11/16"(E) SETBACK4' - 4 25/32"PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SETBACK11' - 9 5/16"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"(E) 6' WD. FENCE(E) 6' + CMUFENCE(N) 6' RWD FENCE(E) WD. LANDSCAPEWALL REPAIR/REPLACEAS REQ'D(E) GARAGEADJ. HOUSEADJ. HOUSETREE OVERHANG(E) 7" ELMTO REMAIN(TO BE REPAIRED)(TO BE REPAIRED AS REQUIRED)(E) CONC. TO BE REMOVED(N) PLANTER W/PITTOSPORUMHEDGES(N) LAWN(N) COLORED CONC.NEW 2-24" BOXCRATE MYRTLETREES IN FRONTYARDREPAIR/REPLACEAS REQ'DNOTE:NO EXISTING TREES ARE TO BEREMOVED(E) HEDGES TOREMAINDrawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A15/8/19SANG02SCHEMATIC SITE PLANSITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES7. ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE    BUILDING PERMIT FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW    BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER AND OR    CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN A REVISION TO THE CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY    ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK.8. NOTE‐WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR PLAN REVIEW, A    COMPLETED SUPPLEMENTAL DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE PROVIDED.9. IF A GRADING PERMIT IS REQUIRED IT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC    WORKS.10. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: WEEKDAYS: 8:00 AM‐7:00 PM                                                          SATURDAY: 9:00 AM‐6:00 PM                                                          SUNDAYS & HOLIDAYS: NO WORK ALLOWED                                                          CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ARE LIMITED                                                          TO WEEKDAYS AND NON‐CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8:00 AM AND 5:00 PMLOCATION MAPPLANNING DATASITENSCHEMATIC SITE LANDSCAPE PLANPLANNING PLAN CHECK3/27/19CR21PLANNING PLAN CHECK5/8/19CR 18' - 1"(E)1' - 9 5/16"2' - 0" (E)14' - 0"13' - 4"17' - 5"(E) GARAGE8'X7' G.D.2'8"X6'8"(N) GYP.BD. PAINTEDPLPL7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"GARAGEGARAGE CLG.7" / 1'-0"8' - 1"EXTERIOR MATERIALS:COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFREPLACE W/ NEW TO MATCHHOUSEEXTERIOR STUCCOREPAIR & REPAINT(E) CARRIAGE DOOR TO BEREPLACED W/ NEW PAINTEDWOOD GARAGE DOORFASCIA GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTSTO BE REPLACEDGARAGEGARAGE CLG.8' - 1"(E) RIDGE12' - 7" +GARAGEGARAGE CLG.GARAGEGARAGE CLG.Drawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A1.13/28/19SANG02GARAGE-EXISTINGROOF-GARAGEGARAGE FRONTGARAGE REARGARAGE RIGHTGARAGE LEFTPLANNING PLAN CHECK3/27/19CR 8'-2"17'-2"6'-2"2'-10"FINISHED GRADEENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.T.O. EAVEMAJOR RIDGEMAIN LEVEL AREAS(N) UPPER LEVELMAIN LEVEL CLG.EXISTING9' - 0"(N) UPPER LEVEL CLG.F.F. 106.85'ATOC102.7'4' - 1 13/16"12' - 0"AVERAGE T.O.CURB SEE SITE PLAN7' - 6 5/16"5' - 10 15/16"7' - 6"45.00°DHE28' - 0"130.50PROPOSED8' - 0"1' - 0"EXISTING 9' - 0"27' - 9" +DHETYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS:8' - 0"1' - 0"COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING HIGH TAB BYCELOTEX OR EQUALPAINTED FASCIA GUTTERS, RAKE TRIM & WOODBRACKETSPAINTED CEMENT PLASTER FINISH(E) CHINMNEY TO BE LENGHTEND AS PER CODEPAINTED CEMENT PLASTER FINISHMARVIN INTEGRITY FIBERGLASS EXT. W/ WD. INTERIORW/ PAINTED WD. TRIM AS SELECTED BY OWNERPAINTED WOOD SHUTTERS(E) HOUSE DETAILS TO REMAIN ATFRONT FACADE(N) ENTRY DOORW/ SIDE LTS.(N) FALSE DORMERTO REPLACE (E)(E) ROOF TO REMAIN AS PER PLANS(N)(3)2'6"x5'0"CST.(N)(3)2'2"x2'4" FXD.(N)2'4"X2'4" WDO.(N)2'4"X2'4" WDO.(N) FRONT DOOR W/ T.GL. SL.1' - 3" .0' - 4"0 ' - 9 "PAINTED FRM. 4 X 1'3"X1'3" WD. BRACKETSMIN.1' - 9"MATCH WDO.CURB MOUNTED ANODIZED ALUM. FLAT GLASS LOW ET.GL. SKYLIGHT6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"(E) PORCH COLUMNS TOIREMAIN13' - 8" +- RIDGE1DOWNSPOUTSEXISTING BUIDLING HEIGHT18' - 7" +-DHE 107.74' = 103.11'+112.37' 2107.747' - 6"PLDHE 106.35 = 103.3'+109.41' 2106.35PL12' - 0"12' - 6"10' - 0"2' - 0" MIN.1(E) COMP. SHINGLE ROOF(E) WD. WINDOWS(E) CEMENT PLASTERFINISH(E) ORNAMENTAL SHUTTERS(E) PLASTER COLUMNS W/ DETAILINGTO REMAINATOC102.7'18' - 7"+-AVERAGE TOP OF CURB4' - 1 3/16"1INTERIOR9' - 0" PLATEDrawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A63/28/19SANG02PROPOSED - FRONT ELEVATIONEXISTING - FRONT ELEVATIONPLANNING PLAN CHECK3/28/19CR 712MAIN LEVEL AREAS(N) UPPER LEVELMAIN LEVEL CLG.(N) UPPER LEVEL CLG.0.0026' - 1 5/16"8' - 0"1' - 0"EXISTING9' - 0"ATOC102.7'130.50AVERAGE T.O.CURB SEE SITE PLAN7' - 6"(N)PR 2'6"X4'6" CSMT(N)PR 2'6"X4'0" CSMT EGRESS(N)4'0"X2'0"T.GL.AWNG.(N)10'0"X6'8"T.GL.DR.(N) WDOS. AND DOORSSEE FRONT ELEVATION ANDFLOOR PLANS FORADD'L INFORMATION TYP.0' - 9".1' - 9"COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING HIGH TAB BYCELOTEX OR EQUALPAINTED FASCIA GUTTERS, RAKE TRIM & WOODBRACKETSPAINTED CEMENT PLASTER FINISHMARVIN INTEGRITY FIBERGLASS EXT. W/ WD. INTERIORW/ PAINTED WD. TRIM AS SELECTED BY OWNERPAINTED WOOD SHUTTERS6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"NEW WOOD DECK W/ PAINTED W.I.HANDRAIL/RAILING12' - 0"7' - 6"DHEDHE107.745' - 10 15/16"4' - 7 5/16"12' - 0"45.00°4 5 .0 0 °2' - 6"(E) COMP. SHINGLE ROOF(E) WD. WINDOWS(E) CEMENT PLASTERFINISH(E) PLASTER COLUMNS W/ DETAILINGTO REMAIN(E) LAPED SIDING(E) WOOD DECK TO BE REMOVEDDrawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A73/28/19SANG02PROPOSED - REAR ELEVATIONEXISTING - REAR ELEVATIONPLANNING PLAN CHECK3/27/19CR 7127121121.5126'-10"17'-7"7'-6"3'-3"FINISHED GRADEENTRY LEVEL F.F.E.MAJOR RIDGET.O. EAVEMAIN LEVEL AREAS(N) UPPER LEVELMAIN LEVEL CLG.(N) UPPER LEVEL CLG.26' - 1 5/16"ATOC102.7'28' - 0"130.502A5(N)PR 2'6"X4'0" CSMT EGRESS(N)4'0"X2'0"T.GL.AWNG.(N)PR 2'6"X4'0" CSMT EGRESS(N)2'6"X3'0" CSMT.(N)2'6"X3'0" CSMT.(N)3'0"X4'6" CSMT.(N)4'4"X1'4"WDO.(N)3'0"X4'6" CSMT.(N)PR 2'6"X3'6" CSMT(N)3'0"X4'6" CSMT.2'8"X6'8"(N)1'6"X1'6"WDO.COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING HIGH TAB BYCELOTEX OR EQUALPAINTED FASCIA GUTTERS, RAKE TRIM & WOODBRACKETSPAINTED CEMENT PLASTER FINISHPAINTED WOOD SHUTTERS1' - 9"PAINTED FROM. 4X 1'3"X1'3" WD.BRACKETS7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"2' - 6"(E) COMP. SHINGLE ROOF(E) WD. WINDOWS(E) CEMENT PLASTERFINISH(E) LAPED SIDING(E) WOOD DECK TO BE REMOVEDVARIESDrawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A83/28/19SANG02PROPOSED - RIGHT ELEVATIONEXISTING - RIGHT ELEVATIONPLANNING PLAN CHECK3/27/19CR NORTH7121121.512MAIN LEVEL AREAS(N) UPPER LEVELMAIN LEVEL CLG.(N) UPPER LEVEL CLG.26' - 2 3/8"ATOC102.7'28' - 0"130.50EXISTING9' - 0"1' - 0"8' - 0"2A5(N)(3)2'6"x5'0"CST.(N)(3)2'6"x5'0"CST.2'0"X3'6"CST.2'6"X4'0" CSMT.PR 2'6"X5'0" CSMT T.GL.(N)2'6"X3'6" CSMT.(N)PR 2'6"X3'6" CSMT(N)2'6"X3'6" CSMT.PAINTED WD. SHUTTERS1' - 9"(N) WINDOWS SEE FRONT ELEVATIONAND FLOOR PLAN TYP.(N) PAINTED 4X WD. BRACKETSTO MATCH FRONTCOMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING HIGH TAB BYCELOTEX OR EQUALPAINTED FASCIA GUTTERS, RAKE TRIM & WOODBRACKETSPAINTED CEMENT PLASTER FINISHMARVIN INTEGRITY FIBERGLASS EXT. W/ WD. INTERIORW/ PAINTED WD. TRIM AS SELECTED BY OWNERPAINTED WOOD SHUTTERS1' - 9"6" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"6" / 1'-0"7" / 1'-0"(E) COMP. SHINGLE ROOF(E) WD. WINDOWS(E) CEMENT PLASTERFINISH(E) LAPED SIDING(E) WOOD DECK TO BE REMOVED(E) SHUTTERSDrawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"RESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A93/28/19SANG02PROPOSED - LEFT ELEVATIONEXISTING - LEFT ELEVATION Drawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTIONRESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A103/28/19SANG02RIGHT FRONT ISORIGHT REAR ISOFRONT ENTRY VIEW Drawing NumberDATEScaleProject Number12345REVISIONSDATEBYDESCRIPTIONRESIDENCEADDITION/REMODEL1543 CYPRESS AVE.BURLINGAME, CA.A113/28/19SANG02KEY PLAN12345671-15292-15373-15414-15435-15476-15517-1555PHOTOS COURTESY OF GOOGLE EARTH City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 12 Valdivia Court Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Request: Application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Property Owners: Douglas Solomon and Lauri Pasch APN: 025-182-200 Applicant and Designer: Audrey Tse, inSite Design Lot Area: 12,073 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The existing single-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 2,379 SF (0.20 FAR) of floor area. The proposed project includes front and rear additions on the first floor and a new second story that would increase the floor area to 4,324 SF (0.36 FAR), where 4,963 SF (0.41 FAR) is the maximum allowed (including a 48 SF covered front porch exception). The proposed project is 639 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The subject property is located in the Hillside Area and Code Section 25.61.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code states that no new structure or any addition to all or a portion of an existing structure shall be constructed within the affected area without a Hillside Area Construction Permit. In addition, it states that review by the Planning Commission shall be based upon the obstruction by the construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit. The existing house contains four bedrooms and the proposed project is increasing to six bedrooms. Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for a six-bedroom house. The proposed garage (20’ x 21’-2” clear interior dimensions) provides the required covered parking. One nonconforming uncovered parking space (9’ x 17’-4”), which is not being altered, is provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking requirements. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications:  Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling (C.S. 25.57.010 (a)(2)); and  Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.61.020). 12 Valdivia Court Lot Size: 12,073 SF Plans date stamped: May 14, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 14’-9” n/a 27’-4” (to addition) 25’-9” 15’-0” or block average 20’-0” Side Setback (left): (right): 2’-10” 1 4’-10 ½” 2 7’-0” (to addition) no change 7'-0" 7’-0” Rear Setback (1st flr): (2nd flr): 90’-2” n/a 104’-0” 98’-5” 15'-0" 20'-0" 1 The existing nonconforming left side setback is 2’-10” where 7’-0” is now required. 2 The existing nonconforming right side setback is 4’-10 ½” where 7’-0” is now required. Item No. 9d Design Review Study Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 12 Valdivia Court 2 12 Valdivia Court Lot Size: 12,073 SF Plans date stamped: May 14, 2019 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Lot Coverage: 2,502 SF 20.7% 3,237 SF 26.8% 4,963 SF 41% FAR: 2,379 SF 0.20 FAR 4,324 SF 0.36 FAR 4,963 SF 3 0.41 FAR # of bedrooms: 4 6 --- Off-Street Parking: 1 covered (17’ x 21’-2” clear interior) 4 1 uncovered (9’ x 17’-4”) 5 2 covered (20’ x 21’-2” clear interior) 1 uncovered (9’ x 17’-4’) 2 covered (20' x 20' clear interior) 1 uncovered (9' x 18') Building Height: 29’-7¼” 29’-7¼” 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies complies CS 25.26.075 3 (0.32 x 12,073 SF) + 1,100 SF = 4,963 SF (0.41 FAR) 4 The existing attached garage measures 17’-0” x 21’-2”, which qualifies as a non-conforming one-car garage. 5 The existing uncovered space is nonc onforming as it measures 9’-0” x 17’-4, where 9’ x 18’ is required for an existing condition. Staff Comments: None. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Michelle Markiewicz Assistant Planner c. Douglas Solomon and Lauri Pasch , property owners Audrey Tse, applicant and designer Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 12 Valdivia Court 3 Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Notice of Public Hearing – Mailed May 17, 2019 Area Map SOLOMONRESIDENCEA4.012 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]EXISTING AND PROPOSEDFRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOLOMONRESIDENCEA4.112 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]EXISTING AND PROPOSEDREAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOLOMONRESIDENCEA4.212 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]EXISTING AND PROPOSEDLEFT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSECTION SOLOMONRESIDENCEA4.312 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]EXISTING AND PROPOSEDRIGHT EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOLOMONRESIDENCEA1.112 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANGMEMWMSW SOLOMONRESIDENCEA2.312 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]EXISTING ROOF PLAN SOLOMONRESIDENCEA2.412 VALDIVIA CT.BURLINGAME, CAarchitecture design interiors[ inSite ]PROPOSED ROOF PLAN