Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2017.03.09Traffic Safety and Parking Commission City of Burlingame Meeting Agenda - Final BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, March 9, 2017 Members of the public may comment on any action or study item appearing on the agenda at the time it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless separately voted for the record. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 9, 2017 Special Meeting Minutesa. Special Meeting MinutesAttachments: Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "Request To Speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The provision of a name, address or other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: NON-AGENDA 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS Community Quality of Life - Priorities and Local Needsa. PresentationAttachments: City Hall Traffic Calming Updateb. PresentationAttachments: 7. INFORMATION ITEMS Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 8/14/2019 March 9, 2017Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Agenda - Final Engineering Division Reportsa. Staff Report Communication Log Attachments: Police Department Reportsb. Farmer's Marketc. TSPC Chair/Commissioner's Communicationsd. 8. COMMITTEE & SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)a. Broadway Parking (Wettan & Bush)b. School Traffic (Londer & Akers)c. Envision Burlingame (Martos & Londer)d. ECR Task Force (Londer & Wettan)e. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 10. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public viewing at the City Clerk's office, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available on the site. NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, April 13, 2017 Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 8/14/2019 1 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Unapproved Minutes Special Meeting of Thursday, February 9, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:01 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBER PRESENT: Akers, Bush, Londer, Martos, Wettan MEMBERS ABSENT: 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: To accept the minutes of January 12, 2017 with the following two edits: • Item 6b, page 5 – remove rankings from priority items; and • Item 7a, page 8, table 2, task 12 – remove strikethrough of traffic brochure. M/S/C: Martos/Londer; 5/0/0 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA No public comment. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a) City Hall Traffic Calming Mr. Wong opened by providing background regarding the traffic calming effort in the City Hall vicinity to date. He indicated residents in the area have been requesting traffic calming improvements over the past several years. He said the most recent iteration 2 included a meeting with staff and residents along Floribunda where residents indicated speed and lack of pedestrian facilities in the area were their two biggest concerns. In response, the City installed (and reinstalled) driver feedback signs on Floribunda, and additional pedestrian signage around the traffic island in front of City Hall. The City Council also approved funding for a traffic study and Traffic Patterns was selected. Mr. Wong went on to explain that two public meetings have been held to date and for those meetings staff expanded its outreach efforts to include residents not only on Floribunda and Almer but also on Douglas, Bellevue, Ansel and the remaining stretch of Floribunda. Based on input at each of the public meetings, Mr. Wong said the design team refined the suggested improvements and came up with the following variations: • Long-Term Improvements – included raised traffic islands, curb extensions, and new curb ramps with three crosswalks at each intersection. The challenges with this design included significant loss of on-street parking (up to 40 spaces total), loss of landscaping, including mature trees, and changing the drainage pattern which would require additional engineering and survey work. • Near-Term Improvements – included the same conceptual plan as the long- term improvements but using a striping plan as opposed to the raised traffic islands, new curb gutters, ramps and crosswalks. Chair Wettan opened the floor for public comment. James Tosh of 1244 Bellevue Avenue was in favor of the traffic circle concept. Eugene Zauber of 1515 Floribunda indicated he presented a petition for traffic calming to the TSPC a few years ago but felt there was never any movement. He said the traffic feedback sign does not deter drivers from speeding. He closed by indicating the first priority should be the safety of the residents and the loss of parking was not as big of a concern for him. Stephen Hollman indicated he was a former TSP Commissioner and that he went to the Department of Public Works in 2009 and offered a solution before the City Council in 2011. He went on to say that during that time, the Mayor directed the Burlingame Police Department to do targeted enforcement on Floribunda. Mr. Hollman stated there have been no solutions for the last eight years and also claimed to have reached out directly to the Public Works Director, Transportation Engineer and Secretary. He closed by stating he felt the first step for traffic calming is police enforcement—ticket and tow, and secondly, the City should look into adding the area to the Residential Parking Permit Program. Larry Stevenson spoke up and felt there should not be any loss of parking with the long- term concept with the proper design and or realignment of the sidewalks. 3 Mr. Root who resides on Douglas felt the loss of parking will greatly impact the residents on Douglas. June Kaufman of 1244 Bellevue has lived in the area for three years and felt the lack of stop control at the corner of Bellevue and Primrose is dangerous as she has witnessed vehicles whipping around the corner in front of the Library consistently. Chair Wettan closed public comment and sought feedback from his fellow Commissioners. Commissioner Martos requested Mr. Wong to prioritize the intersections starting with the heaviest traveled to which he responded with the following rankings: (1) Floribunda and Almer; (2) Floribunda and Ansel; and (3) Bellevue and Almer. Commissioner Martos also inquired about other possible negative consequences and Mr. Wong stated that he thought there would be no other negative consequences to the conceptual plans other than the loss of parking. Commissioner Martos suggested a hybrid approach—find a compromise—in order to preserve some parking but more importantly increase pedestrian safety. For example, he suggested to apply the raised traffic island, new curb, ramps, crosswalks, etc. to the highest traveled intersection and apply the striping plan approach to the least traveled intersection. Commissioner Martos also noted that any of the striping design concepts should have reflective qualities. Commissioner Londer thought the long-term solution was best but is greatly concerned about the loss of parking. He suggested staff look into the possibility of adding the City Hall area to the Residential Parking Permit Program to deter employees in the surrounding areas to park there. Commissioner Londer was not in favor of the striping plan with the potted plants as he stated the design did not fit the character of the neighborhood. Vice-Chair Bush thanked the residents in the audience for their feedback. After several clarifying questions directed to Mr. Wong, Vice-Chair Bush inquired about the process to add the area around City Hall to the Residential Parking Permit Program. Mr. Wong indicated that the area is eligible and would confirm the two-thirds signature requirement. Vice-Chair Bush stated he was in favor of the temporary solution “striping plan” as the parking loss is minimal, and he also liked the idea of having a weekend demonstration to allow residents to get a feel for the configuration. Mr. Wong indicated that the consultant could meet that request by laying out the concept in chalk and allow the residents to walk and or drive through. Lastly Vice-Chair Bush encouraged staff to tweak the aesthetics as the current design with the planters is not visually appealing. Commissioner Akers indicated he was supportive of a temporary, phased approach and encouraged this interim step as a field test to see how people respond to it. As far as the 4 design details go, he noted his concern regarding trees obstructing the view of pedestrians. Commissioner Akers encouraged staff to work with the Fire Department due to access concerns and not to use the standard design template for this project. He felt signage is key to help teach people how to properly use a traffic circle. Commissioner Akers felt the intersection of Floribunda and Ansel is critical as it is a common route to school for many students and since the gate near the intersection of Floribunda and Almer is locked and therefore no pathway, he felt the City should not invest the kind of resources proposed with the long-term design. He recognized the large concern regarding the loss of parking and encouraged members of the community to work with Engineering staff regarding the Residential Parking Permit Program and to report cars parked longer than 3 days. He closed his comments by indicating his support of a stop sign at the corner of Floribunda and Primrose. Chair Wettan indicated that his fellow Commissioners covered most of his comments and questions but did indicate his growing concern with the two-hour parking restriction and the impacts to downtown parking capacity. He also agreed with his fellow Commissioners in that he didn’t feel the planters were aesthetically pleasing. Stephen Hollman spoke again to clarify that the Department of Public Works was not in favor of the Residential Parking Permit program when they inquired in past years. He went on to request information regarding the petition process to which Chair Wettan advised him that staff would get him all the information he needs. The Commissioners, staff and members of the public continued an interactive dialog which resulted in the following: Motion: The Commission request that staff further refines the proposal based on the feedback provided by the commission this evening and for staff to come back with a further refined proposal. M/S/C: Akers/Martos; 5/0/0 b) TSPC 2017 Priorities Discussion The Commissioners went through an interactive exercise to prioritize the following goals for the 2017 calendar year. TSPC Led Effort Rank Project / Task 1 Downtown Modal Access 2 School Traffic Issues 3 California Complete Streets 4 B/PAC setup 5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming 6 SR2S Review 5 7 Broadway Parking 8 Public Shuttles/Transit 9 Grant Strategies 10 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force) 11 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 12 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning 13 Bay Trail 14 Intro to Paving Staff Update via Report Rank Project / Task 1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda 2 Hoover School Update 3 Downtown Parking Strategies 4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 5 California Drive Roundabout 6 General Plan – Circulation Element 7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8 Rec Center Parking 9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 10 Grant Opportunities 11 Grade Separation 12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 13 School Speed Limit Updates 14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail 15 School Safety Improvements 16 California Drive Complete Streets 17 California Drive parking restrictions 18 Traffic Brochure c) Sub-Committee Organization After a short discussion, the Commission agreed that the Sub-Committees will remain the same from the previous year as they still align with their goals and priorities. To reiterate, those subcommittees are: (1) School Speed Limits; (2) Downtown Parking; (3) Broadway Parking; and (4) Envision Burlingame. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Engineering Division Reports • US101/Broadway Interchange Project – Stage 4 work is approaching its completion in February. No roadway closures anticipated. • 2016-2017 Street Resurfacing Program – Below is the preliminary list of streets the City is planning on resurfacing as part of the program. This list is subject to 6 change due to unforeseeable conditions encountered during the bid process as well as construction. Staff has completed an initial “Complete Streets” review, and will meet with community BPAC members to obtain their input as well. LOCATION BETWEEN BAYSHORE HIGHWAY BURLWAY AIRPORT CAPUCHINO AVE MILLS GROVE CLARENDON RD DWIGHT BURLINGAME DRAKE AVE CARMELITA SANCHEZ EL CAMINO FRONTAGE MURCHINSON DUFFERIN LAGUNA AVE MILLS GROVE LAUREL AVE PARK OAK GROVE NEWHALL RD SANCHEZ FORESTVIEW OGDEN DR MURCHINSON TROUSDALE PALOMA AVE MILLS GROVE PARK RD BURLINGAME HOWARD PENINSULA DR CALIFORNIA HUMBOLDT SANCHEZ AVE DRAKE EL CAMINO SEBASTIAN WAY TROUSDALE ARGUELLO SEQUOIA AVE TROUSDALE CLARICE VERNON WAY BLOOMFIELD CLARENDON • California Drive Complete Streets – Second meeting for the project completed. • Larkspur/Linden Traffic Circle – Contract finalized, moving towards project kick-off meeting with contractor. • Hoover School Update – No update. • School Speed Limit – Work order to be generated to install 15 mph school signage along Quesada, Cortez, and Cabrillo. • TSPC Email Communications – No new communications. • TSPC Priority List (Updated February 2017): TSPC Led Effort 1 Downtown Modal Access 2 B/PAC setup 6/9/16: Item 6a 3 School Speed Limit Notices/Review 9/8/16: Item 6b 4 School Traffic Issues 3/10/16: Item 6a 5 California Drive Commuter bike route 2/11/16: Item 6b 6 California Drive parking restrictions 7/14/16: Item 7a 7 Broadway Parking 7/14/16: Item 6a 7 8 Public Shuttles/Transit 9 Downtown Speed Limit Review 10 Review TSPC Mandate 11 Joint agreements with Caltrans Countywide 12 ECR Corridor Infrastructure 4/14/16 & 5/12/16 13 Bay Trail 14 Fee Schedules 15 Joint Commission Meeting (City Council) Staff Update via Report 1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda Completed 2 Hoover School Update 1/12/17: Item 7a 3 Downtown Parking Strategies 12/8/16: Item 6a 4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 9/8/16: Item 7a 5 California Roundabout 9/8/16: Item 7a 6 General Plan – Circulation Element 10/13/16: Item 8d 7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8 Taxi Regulation: Update by BPD Completed 9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 1/12/17: Item 7a 10 Grant Opportunities 12/8/16: Item 7a 11 Grade Separation 4/14/16: Item 6b 12 Traffic Brochure Completed 13 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 12/9/16: Item 7a b) Police Department Reports Since the last TSPC meeting, Sergeant Shepley reported that injury accidents and hit and run accidents are down from the previous report last month. There were no accidents at the intersection of El Camino Real and Floribunda. More notably, he said there were zero vehicle / pedestrian accidents. c) Farmer’s Market Chair Wettan and Commissioner Londer attended the January Farmer’s Market and reported that no issues were raised when speaking to surrounding businesses and or the general public. The Commission will not participate in the Farmer’s Market on February 19 due to the holiday weekend. d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications Vice-Chair Bush shared comments he saw on Nextdoor.com regarding the increase of traffic on Howard Avenue and wondering if it is relation to the new construction in the area. 8 Chair Wettan mentioned a new project behind the hospital and that the residents on Davis are concerned with additional cars diverting through the neighborhood due to construction. 8. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan) Chair Wettan and Commissioner Martos indicated that they will meet monthly with a plan to collect strategies that were hashed out over the years in addition to reviewing the data recently collected by the Commission. Chair Wettan said he wanted a fresh look at the downtown parking conditions after the holidays. The Commission planned to collect additional data points over the next month as well. b) Broadway Parking (Wettan & Bush) Chair Wettan and Vice-Chair Bush indicated they plan to survey employees and discuss within the next few weeks. c) School Speed Limits (Londer & Akers) No update. d) Envision Burlingame (Martos & Londer) No update; Commissioner Martos indicated the next meeting is scheduled for the end of February. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • California Complete Streets • Subcommittee efforts • Community Quality of Life Presentation by City Manager and PW Director • City Hall Traffic Calming 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:57 p.m. Community Quality of Life Join the Conversation on Our Priorities & Local Needs Winter - Spring 2017 Our Objective •As we look to the upcoming budget process, the City is engaging community residents and influentials like you, around our priorities and needs. •While we have a balanced City budget, the City doesn’t have enough money to address all needs identified by the public. •We want to get as many community perspectives as possible to continue to maintain Burlingame’s quality of life. What is the issue? •The City has a tradition of fiscal prudence with balanced budgets and emergency reserves. •But with over $100,000,000 in capital needs there is inadequate funding to address aging, deteriorating infrastructure such as facilities that house our recreational programs, our streets and sidewalks. •Proper maintenance of our sidewalks, streets and other infrastructure keeps our community safe and addresses needs before they become even more expensive in the future. What We’ve Heard So Far We value the community’s feedback! Some of the many quality of life priorities identified by residents in last year’s community survey include: •Continued rapid response to emergency calls •Maintaining city streets and sidewalks •Providing adequate park & recreation facilities •Providing diverse housing options •Maintaining recreation programs and facilities for youth, teens and seniors •Repairing potholes •Reducing traffic congestion Continuing to Maintain 911 Response How does the City prioritize 9-1-1 Response? •Maintaining police services --such as neighborhood patrols and crime prevention programs – is vital to Burlingame’s quality of life. •As a top priority for the City, public safety services account for approximately fifty percent of the City’s General Fund budget. Maintaining Streets/Sidewalks What about those cracks and potholes? •Burlingame maintains 116 miles of sidewalk and has a backlog of sidewalk and ADA-related work •Well maintained city streets, sidewalks and parks help to maintain and protect our property values •Needs include: –Addressing hazardous road and sidewalk conditions –Ensuring rapid access for emergency responders –Ensuring safety for pedestrians – including children and seniors –Addressing any park or playground equipment not to current standards Providing Park & Recreation Facilities Recreation Center Needs •The Burlingame Recreation Center was built just after World War II! •The community values the services provided. However, due to its age, the Recreation Center does not meet current seismic, ADA or programming standards. •A seismically safe recreation center: -Will give our seniors and youth a safe place to gather for community recreation programs and activities -Can serve as a safe evacuation site for residents in the event of a regional or citywide emergency Senior & Youth Recreation Programs Protecting/Maintaining Services for Seniors & Youth •Quality youth and senior recreation programs are vital to Burlingame’s quality of life. •These types of programs keep our children and teens on the right track and engage our seniors with great programs. •Among other types of programs, fitness and wellness programs for all ages keep our families healthy and safe. Community Feedback •Evaluating local service needs and the community’s priorities is always part of our responsible city budget planning process. •We are outreaching to residents and stakeholders to continue to hear your priorities for City services. •The most important input into this process comes from YOU! How can you be part of the dialogue? Take our Community Feedback Survey today; let us know your priorities. Do you belong to other organizations that need this information? Let us know! Stay informed. CITY HALL AREA TRAFFIC CALMING UPDATE Traffic Safety and Parking Commission March 9, 2017 DISCUSSION PREVIOUS COMMENTS Remove planters from the conceptual designs Relocate pedestrian crossings to preferred locations Contact CCFD for additional review Determine/minimize parking loss at each location DISCUSSION DETAIL OF PROPOSED NEAR – TERM IMPROVEMENTS AT FLORIBUNDA/ANSEL Opportunities: Still maintains existing traffic islands and landscaping On-street parking loss (appox. 9 spaces) at this location (previously 10 spaces) Does not require additional engineering Pedestrian crossings further away from traffic circle, reducing potential conflicts. Challenges: Reduced number of pedestrian crossings. Fire tanker access to be field confirmed. Original Proposal Revised Proposal DISCUSSION DETAIL OF PROPOSED NEAR – TERM IMPROVEMENTS AT FLORIBUNDA/ALMER Opportunities: Still maintains existing traffic islands and landscaping On-street parking loss (appox. 4 spaces) at this location Does not require additional engineering Pedestrian crossings further away from traffic circle, reducing potential conflicts. Confirmed closed gate, removed this crosswalk from proposed design Challenges: Reduced number of pedestrian crossings. Fire tanker access to be field confirmed. Original Proposal Revised Proposal DISCUSSION DETAIL OF PROPOSED NEAR – TERM IMPROVEMENTS AT BELLEVUE/ALMER Opportunities: Still maintains existing traffic islands and landscaping On-street parking loss (appox. 5 spaces) at this location Does not require additional engineering Pedestrian crossings further away from traffic circle, reducing potential conflicts. Challenges: Reduced number of pedestrian crossings. Fire tanker access to be field confirmed. Rubberized curbs at this location impact existing inlet. Original Proposal Revised Proposal DISCUSSION SIMULATION OF TRAFFIC CIRCLE DISCUSSION EXPANSION OF RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM Mitigate parking loss by expanding existing RPPP boundary Draft petition showing expansion areas, and provide neighborhood point of contact with informational packet including petition Requires 67% approval of all residents along the affected streets Streets in program can be scaled back based on petition results Once petition has been submitted, it will return to the TSPC as a discussion item. If TSPC recommends program, staff will provide staff report to the City Council for their approval or denial of program. Existing Boundary Proposed Boundary Expansion DISCUSSION GOALS Determine public support for one option Layout and coordinate with CCFD for access Confirm layout Forward recommendation to City Council QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO: 7.a – Engineering Division Reports MEETING DATE: March 9, 2017 To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Date: March 9, 2017 From: Andrew Wong, Transportation Engineer – (650) 558-7230 Subject: Item 7.a - Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission receive a presentation by staff providing an update on various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities. BACKGROUND • US101/Broadway Interchange Project – Stage 4 work is approaching its completion in February. Full closure of the Bicycle/Pedestrian OC anticipated for late-March. • 2016-2017 Street Resurfacing Program – Below is the list of streets which are part of the 2017 Annual Street Resurfacing Project. This list is still subject to change due to unforeseeable conditions encountered during the bid process as well as construction. STREET NAME FROM TO CAPUCHINO AVE MILLS GROVE CLARENDON RD DWIGHT BURLINGAME DRAKE AVE CARMELITA SANCHEZ EL CAMINO FRONTAGE MURCHINSON DUFFERIN LAGUNA AVE MILLS GROVE LAUREL AVE PARK OAK GROVE NEWHALL RD SANCHEZ FORESTVIEW OGDEN DR MURCHINSON TROUSDALE PALOMA AVE MILLS GROVE PARK RD BURLINGAME HOWARD SANCHEZ AVE DRAKE EL CAMINO SEBASTIAN DR TROUSDALE ARGUELLO SEQUOIA AVE TROUSDALE CLARICE VERNON WAY BLOOMFIELD CLARENDON Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports March 9, 2017 2 • California Drive Complete Streets – 2nd meeting for the project completed. Design team working on creating variations based on Concept 2. • Larkspur/Linden Traffic Circle – Kick-off meeting with contractor completed. Anticipating start of construction in April. • School Traffic concerns at Roosevelt School – City staff is reviewing implementation of a turn restriction from Carmelita onto northbound Vancouver during the drop-off and pick-up periods. • OLA School Update – Work order have been issued to install 15 mph school speed limit signage along Cortez, and Cabrillo. Notices for the all-way stops at Hillside/Cortez pilot program have been placed at the intersection. Work to be done in late-March. • Hoover School Update – On March 9, the C/CAG Board will recommend funding the full $700k for the Hoover School Area Sidewalk Improvements. Estimated project cost was $900k, and the City will provide the remaining $200k in matching funds. • School Speed Limit – Work order generated to install 15 mph school speed limit signage along Quesada. Additionally notices have been placed Bayswater/Anita for an all-way stops pilot program adjacent to Washington Elementary. Work to be done in late-March. • Broadway TLC Grant (OBAG II) – City’s OBAG application will be fully funded for $720k. The estimated project cost for this project is also $900k, with $180k in Matching funds. • TSPC Email Communications – No new communications. • TSPC Priority List (Updated March 2017): TSPC Led Effort 1 Downtown Modal Access 2 School Traffic Issues 3 California Complete Streets 4 B/PAC setup 5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming 6 SR2S Review 7 Broadway Parking 8 Public Shuttles/Transit 9 Grant Strategies 10 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force) 11 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 12 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning 13 Bay Trail 14 Intro to Paving Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports March 9, 2017 3 Staff Update via Report 1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda 2 Hoover School Update 3 Downtown Parking Strategies 4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 5 California Roundabout 6 General Plan – Circulation Element 7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 8 Rec Center Parking 9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 10 Grant Opportunities 11 Grade Separation 12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 13 School Speed Limit Updates 14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail 15 School Safety Improvements 16 California Complete Streets 17 California Drive parking restrictions 18 Traffic Brochure DISCUSSION Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City capital improvement projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6). Burlingame TSPC Contact LogUpdated: 3/6/14CompletedCompletedPending Under Review by City StaffNot yet addressed by City StaffNo. Date Requestorct InfInfRequest StatusResponse No. 13 11/5/2014 Alvares 650johTaxi regulationCompletedBPD responded and contacted the tresspassing taxi 6 7/30/2014 SchweisoscRed‐tipping for improved dwy accessCompletedWO issued and completed7 7/23/2014 SchuhkaRRRP prgram for CypressCompletedCC approved RRRP, signs to be installed by Corp Yard8 6/16/2014 ParianispX‐ing guard request @ Ray/ECR/RosedaleCompletedSch. District and CM approved9 1/26/2015 Rogers 650sjrSchool traffic along PalomaCompletedBPD responded and is checking 10 1/15/2015 DemarcojusPalm/ECR X‐walkCompletedTo be addressed as part of Caltrans' Crosswalk Enhancement Project11 3/18/2015 ValadaomRRPP questions re: CypressCompletedemailed resident response, additionally notices sent out12 3/16/2015 James 925‐78parking concerns @1525 CalifCompletedemailed resident response13 3/19/2015 Dawid No mid block U‐turnCompletedphone call back to resident1 6/20/2014 Constantinocoall‐way stop: Howard/VictoriaCompletedUnder review by staff2 10/1/2014 HanifAhSpeeding on Ray Dr.CompletedAll‐way stop review completed @ Ray/Balboa4 11/5/2014 CoutantmSpeeding on RalstonPendingStaff to determine location for installation of temporary driver feedback signs5 10/2/2014 VelascochBicycling concerns on CaliforniaPendingUnder review by staff (BPAC), Class I facilities to be studied 14 4/30/2015 Giorni hoTour Buses dbl parking on Class II along Airport (Near Doubletree)CompletedBPD providing enforcement 15 4/20/2015 Velasco chNACTO Complete Street Webinar on May 20CompletedStaff enrolled in webinar16 5/7/2015 Stacie Lowstared‐curbing along Hillside CircleCompletedStaff to mark out No Parking Restriction along Hillside Circle, then issue WO17 5/27/2015 Salvia 415sa Pedestrian crosswalk safety at ECR/WillowCompletedForwarded info and contact info to Caltrans18 6/22/2015 WallachanEvent at Ray ParkCompletedPark & Rec Staff to coordinate with neighborhood19 6/19/2015 VelascochDesign comments on Carolan Complete StreetsCompletedComments have been forwarded to design team for consideration20 9/10/2015 Shmygol Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway21 9/10/2015 Chan Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway22 9/9/2015 Harvey Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway23 9/9/2015 Fox Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway24 10/16/2015 AnncoBroadway OC ConstructionCompletedemailed resident response25 10/15/2015 Janice & Henry MokjchLarkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedemailed resident response26 10/21/2015 Wendy RossieWBroadway OC ConstructionCompletedemailed resident response27 10/16/2015 AnncoCalif‐Palm constructionCompletedemailed resident response28 11/5/2015 CairnsSCCrosswalk at El Camino and WillowCompletedemailed resident response29 10/30/2015 JonesGUTraffic Congestion Information re Broadway Completedemailed resident response30 11/21/2015 Tidmarsh Concerns regarding RRFB at Paloma/BroadwayCompletedemailed resident response31 12/9/2015 Velasco comment regarding installation of all‐way stop st Balboa/RayCompleted32 12/18/2015 Ryan Drake Avenue onto Adeline red‐curbing for sight distancePendingStaff responded to resident, as well as generated work order33 1/12/2016 Dunn Striping of crosswalks along Broadway (ECR to Vancouver)PendingStaff responded to resident.  Staff to review34 1/13/2016 Velasco red curbing along ECR (Murchison and Trousdale)PendingStaff responded to resident.  WO to be issued for Feb.35 1/19/2016 Dawid comment regarding pedestrian safety treatments at cornersCompleted36 1/21/2016 Peters Speeding along Rivera and ArguelloPendingBPD dispatched as well as traffic hose counters.  Staff to review data, then make determination37 2/5/2016 Dobson Burlingame/California pedestrian crossing on CaliforniaPendingStaff responded to resident.  Staff to review signal timing.38 1/17/2017 White RRFB at Rollins/Edwards for Pen. Humane SocietyStaff to review and bring back at future TSPC meeting.