HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1958.10.30f )' p ' 6 i `'°
Dlederich ,yn
Aorbez,g.
Nti `eL, s
CALL LU ORIYv;K
rae,..11Ar meet'a6 of the
Bu lin'tj ame City ?!taiss.":4y (ffi iss VD'o':-C^held
on the above date. hea tln6 galled to or v.e z at 8 r 00 p.m.
Gbalrem;,Tm ha r%ln prasiqdinga
of �.r k`1 «' �'�:. �,� +.a S' iEiv v $e 6'"� ��ii Saa tle ii"i .� 2 C? `. 8 S� t °•' t• 4 L . 7 1 •-•
8 ._ Q i' `..o %i L J.11 s:, 9 1J ,. - it �: u .., L C.;
of Ucto a`':- 1958" :rre;va aj pro'v`ted and, adoptad.
FST1TIC)A
1109 _ € �,`� t �e; L,€ a }ltt��
�•s � ��. �i �JTt2.��.; t'.. 1 .�i..a �. _ �s'..s y .i-1 _ J1.�4. ;. �d.�. �✓y.�
_<iia �JZopt`'`-Pto in,
t 10Le & o
Chalmjaan Ma4rtir Veco�,Yllze d ilsr, Spurgeoxi 'i tG .. d-vise :hat t. thex,e :1,2,
back -yard on the property z there being a F racy 01f tv
6 feet betwaen t.k;e house :grid tkie rear property 1_in-F 0 To Co,mpt. P-!-Aif
for this grad td orovl e an area for family Ease, t1 :31.de Yarn} r ;:+off:.
facs,a can Laguna A erzu e was enclosed by a si7 foot fa a.cc:„
The Planning Consultant mooted thalt, the provisions of the, ors inr nl-le _�•M;:.
strict fence na',- ht :o cor rier° lots to 3. feet,,
Corumtssionzr 1ndig.3tated that he had vleliefd tkie Property and it,
would appear that t-ie s-,o=.use Itself was so situated to cr°ea 'e a blind
corner and t)ze fen eg located 6 to 9 Feet out; f ron, the house, added.
to the corgi lio a, Sara L 3 yxdi6 $in Bested approval of the
> un Sect to de termira tion by the Police Department, at a. later date".
7sd'Iet e Cr no'tS4^ e:za0 o aairIat I t U t e s a ttDaffg.5'. 11�F-,�
The Pla.ani ,g F-d",rised that the +?pplIcet on f'1ifa?t• be
on the bN SIS Of Condi-*Lb on Of hardship, Yy eLLtce f l �'c, ni•;
and. i�he-rysible ef'tec:, oil other' slde-y ro. tNro—L):E'L, .CEI whore
que—S s m. yV ✓_ made o
Cari .'..: i.»:%nar klezWerson y- C - ad. nle
o j't ^•- & y 5.1 { _ ,:... -.
be a hazard asad introducod a motion that the val- ante be de}dic-d
Notion seconded by 'Commissioner Aoroerg and carried on, the followi:ac,
roll call vote
AYES; COVit<,IS"SI1JE S. Diederichsen, henderson, Plartin, Norbergn Stave)
, UES : CWUJSSlWLFS : Kindig
t�BS&4T CUMhISS_T.0A6HS : Fin£ er
CiaG�r:.a, n Aa:-tln 1141p, S,,p 1.`"_`t;eon of t'ia FrI vilege of appera? 6o the,
City Council.
1. SLi'srJVtdDI ISIUA Parcel B , Blocik 7. hil p Estate i'To n_.�3....
An application to resubdivide a portion of the lands of the
California Teachers° Association was submitted to the Commission for
formal consideration. Said resubdivision proposed to estlablish
Parcel "I", with frontage on Ogden Drive.
Tne City En,65 ac-er requested to at the matter of sanitary sewer �-i t d
d.rafYaa:= e fac -1.? g t fes be, clrar$.f.fed prior to acceptatace of tLe r esub-
divi.sion.
Lro Narr described the probleans relative: to disposal_ of' storm waters
and, in addition, e pMassed opposition to a "public Tntil4ty easerr,ent"
desi,b. nation on tree tr:apa stai ln6 that this ease,:�,eat., in, the n atvre of
the development of the property, would result .?.n a sevler e&68—
meat" , vnii.cn was not acceptable to the City lire �ta:rr suE�L�estrc,d that
tree easament should be a pr va—tF easement and the of any
utilitiesthe-ain he responsibility of the o7nixe.°sc,
Chairman Nartin questioned Mr. Lahore, repmse ntative of the owner,
who stated that the easement had not beefy dedicated too the as a
public utility easement
After further discussion, Mr. LaAore advised that he was not In
position to aoce pt any revisions concerning the disputed easement.
Thebes be sr , no ob jections, the a.pplicat`�oa wras thereafter cont-.nae1
to the m6etin of Advember 10, 1958, to oermi.t the aPpltcants an.
opportunity to rasolve the ratter with tree City Engineer.
2. Rv;SbBI--)IV 5Z;0A m ► ots 6 and 7. E;l 0u€anito Acres SubdIvisjQp,,,
An applica'tiora proposing a resubdi.vision of Lots 6 and 7, El 111all"to
Acres a3i ia+ `'b' C3 g .ti?as submitted for forma -I r'+i3ns d i, a ,ion. �a�= i re-
subdi.vi.sloa� proposed to shift the common lot line 'bet:. c��::-.
lots.
Tµ City g e9 r 4 ! f+ L ,{ f
The tia •__�y Engineer �� ��.t9�,d �.�'3:..at this .�j3 �'df.:-'Ss l�ak.X}�.�i:i�ai�F�".�_l�e
In raply to Chairmen Martin, Mr. Fred Qvand,✓_a ca�'rner oi' Lot 1 ana. c �a-
vel.oper of tkze Q ubdi,r1 Sion. advised, that clhf< proposed han-;a w v!.:-u
offer A ''Or, o/oxavenicnl'alt approach to the 6&, age Oil :mot 7
�J 4.
Nr- Quandt stated that he was in accord with the .proposal.
There beirib no ob jectlons heard, a wotion was Introduced by
Commissioner Ki.ndig, seconded by Commissioner Henderson that the re -
subdivision be approved. Notion carried unanimously on roll call
vote.
o RESUBDIVI,SION Lands of Bearint.
An appllea`i" on to resubdivide the lands of B. I. Bearint, oridinally
submitted at the mee.tin6 of September 8, 1958, was abain considered
by the Commission. .in earlier discussions, Commissioners had in-
dicated reluctance to approve further resubdivisions of the Bearint
property without assurance that the Necessary public improvements,
curbs, sidewalks, gutters, etc., were to be Installed.
A letter written under date of October 7, 1958, by Robert 'Thompson,
attorney representing Dr. Bearint, was read offeriraE; tape following:
(1.) To enter into an improvement agreement with the City to provide
necessary public improvements to the specif°lcations of the City
Er 6lneer, the work to commence not later than three years from date
of said agreement, or at the time tiiat a building; parmit application
for new construction should be filed, whichever date is sooner;
(2) to post a Goad. In the sum of 47000.00 to assure completion of
the Improvements.
Commissioner Stivers a6aln stated his opinion that the amount of the
bond offered by Dr. Bearint dial not appear to be sufficient, pEar-
ticularl,y la view of the fact that there was no definite program out-
lined by the City as to actual Improvements required.
The Plan_nl€a_,Consultant stated that the cost flgv res had been pre-
pared by the contractirk firm of Fiek, Firenze and. VicLean£ based on
what was cor►sldered to be a proper work plan.
Chairman P'tarti n recognized Dr. Bearint who advised that at the pre. afat:
time. tie preferred not to become Involved In any agreement concerning,
public improvements, but In order to expedite Turther resubdiviviloa� of
his lands, was prepared to proceed in accordance with the plan out-
lined in the communisation.
The City attorney Otated that from the standpoint of tfZe City It
would be preferable to process the appiitation 'under tips provisi.oiz
of the Subdivision Ordiaance. 111r. Karciel pointed out tnat the offer
made by Dr. Beariat differed from a normal subdivision agreement only
In the postponement date of performance of public Improvements
The Pla-ria ng Consultant stated that in his opinion there did not ap-
pear to be any objection to the time element which was made sa part
of the proposal and.further advised that It was his understa-ad rg th—a t
Dr. Beal lat wab hoping; to avoid the cost of additioml. €;ng$ neoring
work Involved in ars out -right subdivision agreement. Mr. Fiami note'a
tkiat In the event of transfer of title of any portion of the prouerty r
the cianers should be made aware of the proginm for public improvements..
In the general dis cussioa which followed, the. City En, i,I neer stated
that it was not possible ble to arrive at a cost figure Of t_kia
''6j `> '•tom (.f �`e� c 3
�y M..-
1. 1., .s, t e
c�u? .v S1_a�nr t t: •fl i'` c: '?;.: 3I!,C), m e :'r s s" ei7Q+a11-:`e i C➢ 7,.i :E'ilJ,. .
Dz, Be r i at d 1;_!!a 0 _'k t` y 9 8 eng Yteer .bY't. g f'2ep a x'tlpoLit to co me t10 ;'o, e,
rTe t :;llid. uere being no o� je-etions,, the MI-Rtte-K. WEIS f"O.YA 0 Zed to 0-he
r• a 1 Z e r `3 n ti r f � �:o *r: is 7 i
?';ct1� oz AE3�'L1-s •La�,> s'� zo• tl? t fi+.SrS3. �,Jt�r:_o
4. 5.PX`iL & N s,'T ,fir r2 t �" apt is �. Chvt .o' l _.. SPu_n(aV 2ch-001. gayo._ YL ui. ,,,h
r he $' 6 Ts9�w '�� l �f his. t�l�' �'e;g8t� �i�: of t�'t�� '�.3 �'t r apt � r3`t: 'Lr'�3LLi'G�i o
i'�irl f"�:raic 4L_iz �.�'�r�' to use ?._ :i'i#�i A'df1k'0 !_C1C'c t d at
80 E1_ Cassino Feel for ,l ne-Lay g c.hool and youth ,nth activity purposes,
LN statemant, 1bsvin6 a nurrDer of recommeadatYoas from the City Fire
Leyj rtmeat , was reP.d and accepted for filint, with tkie application,,
Yloyd E o jeraral a6s, ci;airman of the Church finance committee,, xsi€as in
attendance and discussed with Commissioners the proposed use. der.
Je nn.i ids stated that the buildi,nt, &d joi.ns the present chu.-x ch
property and will be used to supplement sunray school classArooms rand
for youth group meetSnbs
In reply to a question. i`rom Commissioner Aorberg c;onc:erniag the dr:! ve
vYay which offed access
to ss1 Camino,hr.c1e1? 1 .T1��i eta eC� t):a i.,hls
would be closed off to prevent its use.
'.9hal_ men i' art n .E.dGvi ted u-o [.menu from those in attendance p
William Beck:etto rest "e;nt of 827 El Carl in-o Real,, advised that tie 1=1,a3
coaace,rn:d lest % iara be 4 sturbeance in trig Y ei,+ ;hboriiood f rotil %J.ncrea eld
automotJils traffic and_ act ° vi.ties of the youth groups.
111j alter Eo Fjiller,, ott yer of property adjolnla,, ; irwriediately to the n.or"i-, t ,
protested that the use would create a nuisance to aei6rlbori ng prcp:' ,."'i::4 es
The Plannin4; Consultant stated that church uses were proper In. rec,-+.-
dential districts, Should. there be a question tiaat a nuisance could.
deirelop from the use, it was within the authority of tyle Commissloa �_•o
set the aeGes€;ary restrictions for control
The applicants Indicated that there were no objectors to rest-,olc,t: n-a
upon the use Lnd a motion was Introduced by Co►tmissioner Dieder i c%vssea
t?iat the permi.l, be alpproved' subject to tha clos4n� of the C�.:C°:r.��E;y,'.'a te.
prevent automobile:,
entering or 1eavinjL the property .i'ri)i-ii -"le
El Camino compliance with the recomime-ndat!one of the
fire inspector, as noted in the Puerto titled. "Data B" and acceptou as a
?,art of the application.,plus the use of t'K3o—tai1perablell fuses
to i
It,��ra� 3 �'S:2 SFz!,t=�� "Data � r G'o'a3S'ti`TFkG'`:�i/`er3 of �-oi!c4.a a1.�I�; t�l� flE '.0 v-'a
ride je twaen t ,10 prc.1)6-pty and tart l.mmed i te_3 y ad o-j' yli ng, to ti-e
m0:C40 porn, c.1osirkg :our on tiunda.y through, Thuredey a vealn s, 11.'30 r_ilea
closing Fk1day and Sa iaY'day evenings. Motion ;seconded by Corwj ss1Lc_,`-_i,
go ,'Derg and carried unanimously on roll call vote,
Cha.ix-ma 2 Mprt jn advised the applicants that the permit was tS^axat�r
provided It was not appealed prior to Tuesday, adovember 4E
'The hearirg map_ the after declared concluded.
-4-
5o Vt ,^kT%:Lk '9E% — The xti t-,,vva-,ir Co3"'F)o3''at.'ion,
A public, adC'#e Inn was scheduled on date on -:. rz 3��?Ji"' Wct�•:- �� �1: 3iti:?'t:'; C
by Tile Kingswazy Corpor-ation Rreguestin6 a to p'8'ao—t pk-op ri-�Y
classified as R-4 (fourth residential) tee be used fe; n
executive off ice building and _ off-street parking, Dales property loca•t,e (
on the easterly side of El Camino Real oe i-jeen Chapin avenue' v..sci
Bellevue avenue, being; Lat 10 aad portior_? T,ot 12, Blec lc L0, ��1 ?.ir.;-.t~►�,e
Laad. Company Subdivision,
.4 letter dated October 16, 1958 a was z efad f'rorr the Kln ;s- ay Gorpo,= :tion
describingg the proposed construction, 1a)n0-sc-apJL ij, par'i:ir7�
A letter dated October 27, 1958,, was read from the burlinisaLticCx"'La7,bar
of Commerce requesting favorable consideration of the application
statlnez� trLat the ,proposed use would be an asset to the city.
Cyrus j, McHillang (attorney representlnfb the applicant, submitted a
plot playa and drawin6 and stated trvnt tale d.evelopri:er_t; will occupy d.
lots on Chapin. Avenue, wf ich' are presently zoned for commercial usa',
and an R-4 lot .nrhich fronts on the El Camino,
Commissioners Questioned Mr,, i''lckii?-lani on .several points and 'e r';. "Ad,
vised that t 1) ln!�ress and egress would bW f yom Chapin 13,ve.Fuo
(2) '1 sere would not by parking on the El Camino side of the; pr('.)P( r•ty n
(3) The bull din,,z would, be set back 35 feet, from the El cam yea
Mr. Vichillan stated further "tY!e'% once C.G►_'is'L`rucC•if)n u?Zd•,..i tt?f:;
owners ,%iould be agreeable. to filin;, a map e:>x° �. �.
erase v 'F is t.l � o lines and C�"ems G C32+4 i'L j. C1 $ ? �;. '_ 10,6'3 1;a--
valved,
Commissioner Ad rbarg expressed has oD;3_t24.o ."a f avo.r of t' a T)=o jv'et- ?d.
described it a�, a credit to th3 community.
In the 6ene.r'al discussion hich followed,, r°efer',:nce was made to thf.
proposed 35 foot set -back on 'tile E1 Camino froata8e aaad Str. Acivillian
stated tAat the orik�inai intention Baas to abide by this, but In vi. _- r
of tiie city 0 e reguf.x° meat for a meximum set -back of 20 Beet o h.l s
would prefer; not to be held to tile j;ret: ter set-bacic,
Chairman Fiari;ln called attentilon to the plot plan sut:w."Ltced. ,'y the ,r=
plicant wraich indicated a setback of 28 .feet and st-aced 'h1� =erz
sonally would prefer the 35 foot set -back.
Comments were invited from those In a ttentiaane they a" of log La. , spo_+:e
ita favor of the app? icatf4ion:
L.R. Anderson, prokpert owner 1460 Belle, ti -:F, Avenue; ; _;e awl. i>r r7v- E,'Q'°
£ p&r' r;i3_r1t ?'�6Jil��' C3 I�eaZ��� �445 BvF.ley-leydii�v kL.C: Jorin Bo Cor;�Ccro
Burl I?a,, wire a ea lto?' and ob aar of Burlf.a6ame -pr opar'tles � Robert Tovi e..
Burli%ame .merobant ?raa member of tiie Boaz-d, of Dlrectors of E,e
Better Bur°llnt�ame Association.
The Plaa alb Consultant pointed out that the sketch of the build:"3_n,L and
the plot plan were.not sufficient to preawl'& $ colrp%c✓' te pjctu_? : of
Was proposed and G%Se stEd th-at f ina.l i3l_a:vis be reviewed ewed by the Co "gym �. erg
to d� ter-MInG OvOral .lay -out, parkin.-xa ar4.':t l.tacatuire::
- 5
f
f'et c-+ — 1 .:.' :1 t,: c rl" ,:Yth a_ ..e s � �� ��__ � ."i za,. f Yy
i i-r E"_t..:c-,.�, 6.i . :1 __.... %:.ee,^: y'•.�'.. (y. _. !_i.,CJ Ydrtj t.�,:L�.,,§ 1 .:'%vtC: T.' i, .'!.:..,�_.� i;. _.. _LG Fr l:.: L.?.!.'y-�,�(i�viu
av, iti "' ;' i Y C3L° f inal' plr`_.p-9, t-fiat 1-ne Woisklng, plans be, subi!AGeif
0
Commissioner 5';,1VarS state .',As o loosit.ion to the proposal And protested
extension of Comme€acial uses on the fad. € bwllao,
In a final comuii3-nt on the problem of the scat -back on El Camino Real,
Ctiairrfan Nartin, advised t1ita a0plica{its ;ri; a subsequent to a stady of
tyre lxo: kL.,q�,, p1«aG,, should the Oorurfisslori feel that a lesser set -back
was �ustil-- ,et P z` Fro 28 _ aot could possibly be accomplished
A mationwas introduced by Com-missioner Henderson tMt the tariance be
6-ranted sub lest to a..35 Foot set -back alorz6 the l Camino frontage;
no provIls3on for access to the buildln,6 from the S1 Camino; construction
of trio storim - rainago structure at the emek In accordance with spacifi-
cationo of iie City Entjneer; final approval by the Commission of a
plot, plan and warkirLS plans, Motion seconded b; Coll►Assioner Diederichseb
and carried on the following roll call vote:
AV . CUn MISSIUAE RS: Diederich ena Henderson, AindiL & ;liartin, Norberg
ACES- CO' P.ISSi_UAERS : Sti,,rers
rt
6,ci:yw'rii i! =irr:e''tI:3 q'+:'6iLest d to the applicant that if pos-s$ble tha plane.
be made available for Commission V tudy at the meeting of Move mber 10,1958.:
n Of' v 1;-',I'T
Ttere, 'being no furthax businses, the " S '35: :mac' ., w u1 a,l y adjournz(f:. at
l l n OO r �
Respectfully. submitted,
Everett. 4. rUndig
Secretary
—61—