HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1957.06.24CITY OF RLTRL INGAME PL,ANIP ING C01 i:iISS:C ON
141 M TES
Rags l,ar Meet -ling
June 24, 1957
Crr:l f',_E: L ; 2_RESs�NT COW
►.SSii3T�?E2 ^ A.i3 Z°.I' 0`�' S PRESENT
Di ederichsen Henderson Attorney liar_ el
Finger Norberg Piano Cons. 17jann
Kindig City Engineer Marr
Martin
Stivers
Meeting called to order at 8:00 p.m.; Chairman Martin presiding,
Minutes of the regular meeting, May 27, 1957, and study meeting,
June 10, 19579 were approved as written.
Chairman Martin stated that this was the time scheduled for certain
public hearings, notices having been published as required.®
HEARINGS:
RECLASSIFICATION and VARIANCE: Andrew J. and Mary Conway,
Thomas Jo and Kathleen Culligan for gasoline service station
El Camino Real and Dufferin Avenue.
(Item No. 9 on the agenda.)
An application dated February 5, 1957, submitted by Nndrew J,
and Mary Conway, Thomas J. and Kathleen Culligan, requesting the re-
classification from partial R-1 and C-1 District to complete C-1
District (retail commercial) of two vacant lots located oz. the north-
east corner of El Camino Real and Dufferin Avenue.
A second application, under date of February 5, 1957,f rom the
same applicants, requesting a variance from the provisionE of the
zoning ordinance to permit the erection, operation and maintenance
of a gasoline service station upon said land.
A communication dated March 21, 1957, was read from Edward Ro
Fitzsimmons, attorney at law, representing the applicant:, advising
that the present zoning (R-1, first residentia'L) prohibii,s the
"Economically feasible development of the land" and the >roposed
service station use is held to be the "highest economical. use".
Letters and petitions of protest were read as follcws:
1. Burlingame Village Improvement Club Committee oppose, to
reclassification and variance, Lots 1 and 2, Block 10,
Burlingame Village Subdivision;
2. Burlingame Improvement Clubs Council, Fred W. Lehman, president,
in opposition to a gasoline service station. at E1 Camino Real
and Dufferin Avenue;
3. A petition in opposition to the proposed rezoning submitted and
signed by 56 property owners in'the Burlingame Village Subdivision.
Chairman Martin thereupon called on Mr. Fi.tzSimmons who advised
that his clients were convinced, after considerable investigation, that
the property would be an "excellent service station cornert9. However,
there was no intent to disturb neighborhood harmony and in deference
to the opposition to the service station use voiced by the overwhelm-
ing majority of residents in the Burlingame Village area, the owners
hereby.authorized withdrawal of the applications at hand.
Continuing, Mr. FitzSimmons stated that in lieu of the service
station use, the owners now proposed a reclassification of the two
subject lots, as well as two additional lots directly south across
Dufferin Avenue, to R-4 District (fourth residential) to accommodate
a "studio -apartment" development.
Considerable discussion ensued and, at the suggestion of the
City Attorney, Chairman Martin accepted the withdrawal of the
original applications and requested Mr. FitzSimmons to submit a :new
application specifying the alternative proposal.
Mr. FitzSimmons was reminded that the revised application must
be presented first to the Commission at a study meeting at which time
the date for the public hearing will be set.
VARIANCE: lugs. Betty Cook for nurserZ school.
(Item. No. 8 on the agenda.)
An application to operate the "Wee Tots Nv.rsery School,
700 Peninsula Avenue,, presently operated by Mrs. Grace Kortick under
a variance approved by the Planning Commission.
Mrs. Betty Cook,, in attendance, requested a continuance of the
hearing to the July 22 meeting of the Commission and stated than at
that date she would know definitely whether or not she would be in
position to continue with the application.
There were no - protes u-s voiced and the eontznuaz?ce was granted
as requested.
to RESUBDIVISION - Lots i and 82- Block 29, Mills Estate Now 7
A request to change the existing common lot line between the
above described properties.
Mr. Jack Dovey, engineer, spoke for the applicants and stated -
that the building plans for the lots require the present irregular
common lot line to be changed to bring about a more .favorable align=
meat.
Chairman Martin asked for objections to the proposal and, there
being none, a motion_ was introduced by Commissioner Diederichsen,
seconded by Commissioner Finger that the resubdi.vision as submitted
be approved. Motion carried unanimously on roll call of members
present.
2. RESUBDIVISION - Parcel "A", Bearint Property, Easton Industrial
Subdivision.
An application to resubdivi de the lands of B. I. and Teresa Bearint,
thereby establishing parcel "C" of 0.46 acres, with frontage of 100 feet
on Bayshore Service Road.
Questioned by the Chair, the City Engineer and the Planning Con-
sultant stated that the resubdivision was proper, The City Engineer
explained that the proposal will divide one large parcel of acreage
into two parcels.
There being no protests voiced, a motion was introduced by
Commissioner Finger, seconded by Commissioner Diederichsen that the
resubdivision as submitted be approved. Motion carried unanimously on
roll call of members present.
3. RESUBDIVISION - Parcel "G", Block 8, Mills :Estate Subdivision No. 3.
An application requesting the resubdivision of Parcel "G", Block 8,
Mills Estate No. 3 thereby establishing two separate parcels.
Mr. Warren E. Spieker, co-owner of the property, discussed with
Commissioners the proposed development plans advising that one 50 foot
parcel will be conveyed to a new owner for construction of a combination
store and office building, the remaining 45 foot lot to be retained by
the present owners.
Commissioners stated their opposition to the dimensions of the
proposed lots and were advised by the Planning Consultant that at the
present time there are no regulations limiting lot sizes in commercial_
districts.
In reply to the Chair, the City Engineer and the Planning Con-
sultant declared the resubdivision to be proper.
A motion was introduced by Commissioner Finger that the application
as submitted be approved, seconded by Commissioner Diederichsen and
carried unanimously on roll call of members present.
4. RESUBDIVISION-- Mrs. Charles J. Bassett - Lot 6, Block 1,
Burlingame Park Subdivision No. 3.
An application to resubdivide the property at 133 Pepper Avenue,
thereby establishing two parcels with frontages on Pepper Avenue.
The Planning Consultant addressed the Commission and referred to
previous discussions with the applicant at which time it was determined
that should the resubdivision be accomplished t;he garage presently in
existence would become a part of the second lot, leaving the existing
house with no garage and in violation of City statutes. For this
reason, Mr. Mann suggested that the Commission withhold action on the
application until such time that evidence can be presented to show the
new garage in place. Mr. Mann further suggested, in consideration to
Mrs. Bassett, that the Commission convey to her an informal opinion
on the resubdivision as proposed.
-3-
In reply to Chairman Martin, the City Engineer stated that the
resubdivision appears to be in order, meeting the ordinance require-
rien.ts for lot size as well as street frontage, but, pending a
qualified field survey, his approval must be withheld.
In discussion with Mrs. Bassett, Commissioners expressed op-
position on the grounds of poor aesthetics, declaring the proposal to
be "mutilation" of property.
The City Attorney. in reply to the Chair, stated that should the
application meet the requirements of the ordin neesA approval must be
gran_ ted,
The hearing ivas thereafter continued to the regular meeting of
July 22 and Mrs �. Bassett was requested to be present at that tins e .
5. RESUBDlVISION - Portion Lots 4 and 5p Bloc:[ 5?., Easton Adcitior No5
An application to resubdivide the property at 1517 Balboa Avenue,
thereby establishing two parcels with frontages on Balboa Avenue.
Mt. Nicholas Bogoslovsky, owner.
The City Engineer addressed the Commission and advised that sub-
sequent to the previous hearing held on the application, he had met
with Mr. Bogoslovsky and reached an agreement en the cost of installing
an additional sewer lateral to service the new lot and payment in null
had been made to cover said cost. Further agreement was arrived at to
remove the small house at the rear of the property.
There being no protests voiced, a motion was introduced by Com-
missioner Fingers seconded by Commissioner Diederichsen that the ap-
plication as submitted be approved. Motion carried on the following
roll calla
AYES: COTUISSIONERS: Diederichsen, Finger, Kindig
NOES: CODU;IIS SI ONERS : Martin
ABSTAIN COM14ISSIONERS: Stivers
ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: Henderson, Norberg
6. TENTATIVE MAP - "Creekside" Subdivision.
The Planning Consultant addressed the Commission and stated that
he was authori zed on behalf of the applicants to request a continuance
to the meeting of July 22 to permit the prepariation of a new map
There were no protests and the continuance was granted as requested
7. FITVIL MAP - Etienne Industrial Park„ Unit No. 1,
A subdivision of approximately 6 acres in the Easton Industrial
Subdivision.
The City Engineer addressed the Commission and stated that the
map was in order, all stipulations, previously made a part of the
Tentative -Maps having been met by the subdivider.
There were no protests received and a motion was introduced by
-4-
Commissioner Kindig, seconded by Commissioner Finger that he map be
a-Dproved as submitted mid recommiended to tba i ty Co-tzrl it fox--
Motion carried unanimously on roll call of me bars present;,
M; BUSINESS-.
1. Chairman Maz v?n announced that this was the time for election of
Commission officers for the ensuing year and nominac tions were in order:
CILA IRWITA .- C Qzmraissioner Martin no -urinated by Coy missioner Diederi chs<
seconded by Commissioner F i nge2:- and unanimously e? ec t ed
VICE-CHAIRDI�i' N; Commissioner Stivers nomif,ated by Commissioner
Finger, seconded by Commissioner Diederichsen.
unanimously elected.
SECRETARY; Commissioner Kindig nominated by Commissioner Fingera
seconded by Commissioner Ste vers and unanimously
elected.
Elections were thereafter declared officials
20 Reference was made to a statement written by Chairman EZartin, at
the request of Councilman Andre; Byrd, presenting for the consideration
of the City Council the opinion of the Planning Commission relative to
the City9s need for a Planning Consultant and the services required
and rendered.
A motion was introduced by Commissioner Kindig, seconded by Coma
missioner Finger that the statement in full be incorporated as a part
of the Planning Commission records. Motion carried unanimously on
roll call of members present.
There being no further business, the meeting was regularly adjouned
at 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Everett K. Kindig
Secretary
-5-