Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1957.09.30n >de .. adIg 6t:a P. t. stive 's Ci.LL TO 0JRDER J ga r 6eptembe:r'° JCS;, 11157 55 i'.i a.C' O A regular meeting of the Burlin-garre City Pla.;n..ni"Ar Commission was held on the above da- to o IMee ting cad lofJ- to order at 8 ,; 00 Ckma R'mµn .o°fir'_ nxr--.si-dii?g. ViLiU1'E-S !PBEx IOUS iN&E'2L-1G The minutes of Av_,ga st 26, J'957,, were corrected in the second parag:s°aph, page one F, to re -ad t" r•-acorded in the mi.- uter, of July 2? t 195'/" , and as corrected ,re a unl.nir-nously approved. The minutes of the St-ludy Meeting of September 10, 1957.9 wers unen—liiloualy approved, PUBLIC HS IINGS Public hearings, scheduled in coaforlman.ce to appropriate procedure, were conducted on the following: 1. HESUBDIVISIOA o PUHTIUi4 OF LOT 21a LOTS 229 23, 24, 259 FiMC,L 10n I<ILLSDAIE 149USTR? PARK AO. 5. A proposed re.subdivision of the above property was submitted to the Planning Com-ni 'ssion for formal action by Fire Jack Dove, represent Ing the owner, th,6 Western Title insurance and Guaranty Company, 84ro Dove explained that the resubd.ivision will eliminate the existing lot lines, thereby creaking two parcels of approximately 3 acres each. Commissioners discussed the proposal with 11ro Earl tifilsey of the firm of Wilsey and Ham, in attendance, and confirmed with the City Engineer and the Plaiw.ing Consultant that the map was proper, A motion was thereupon introduced by Commissioner Henderson, seconded by Commissioner Kindig that the resubdivision as submitted be aPProvedo _lotion carried unanimously on roll call of members preuent. 2o s .S_ BD' ° .aE_ ux=3j.� J 1.5 =;nd 1,, PORT- _,,1�-,�a 1 : � E .��1_�y��. .� �3-- GT "' ,cr,llt,-,;'z 61%1' ',.s�j•I pE l +`<' i�;il N �:...... F i _..._�._.,......... _ i,_,� .5 �. e"t mi ;r Fa4.d 2»= 7 Li' c S', i ?,`.?, 5.!#E. e _E il`t1_r_.a, S T" y 's __C:S?o"?}t' P :1Y: i}?k-t T3e :i'JC; — .-t s.7 YC poz.': as +,ot 14" BlCllp'k 3, GleLrwood Park-,` L�dadriTl,:3�.�Y is k-.. ls:_, .s.._....w�.. �. Wit:.'# � .,�'�. . � 'f' .r ?4x+� r,� y " RR r--j l 16073 6 7 2 c: e 3 I "i • �'' .if, .1. •. tein ,. � ,6 ,d a �Ei 0 ,.9 t.i� c. � , .Ci .�� } ..'C�a..a a g a u -..., ._. �.'t.� .._ ._._ l_e-j � �: ,. r .. s.; }�.v, c „{d` `•.f r a i_iS iC r?mod o t'rs v � °? ? �'sC�3? .�?.:2 "Le, to tile: � .r the, nu1,%1€; t ,) 'b.'eJs r... advised UiC Commission that when t iris cu_i-r es for de F}e ?�;o nw nt o uh� property t ,,.e o's.!ne �"'b" c.?i l l l.€1.lk�? L lG 4: p r y (�'�a ^ �_<-c: C'F! 'i r. 'ye ''le s�'+ty- c..lcsn S�l✓bas ti eJCs. � ...'�.+1;,�� d'v' +�.�w'�G=. �..... __,f,'4am iL.i..4/ 1..;./id P ,�yy s�la_y f n;9�..'' Consry3L:`e't ant, ='La s`''r . , /oy L''Ci34 es te(','3 'T3$�•�+at:l"d�e'.,''"�ii�fy'1�1/l7�.^+x�-`a.G'n. to/�yl..CAsi13e7e_rui'. on Mmho Wa to s5 proposal, a Y.�tiS�'d that r-jo .�Ga..dl as Jh4r W...(..,;5 lis i+4l3biifi:.sL�`.e—C , the existingr set -backs of 3-5 feet on the :+ %re:aua ana Cv-o-ess A ve_rrue fft&o'I.t: ges will, uc,9Y'_d vi-it.`i.l s:_,vc tim. `f,Yat L:.he ow?'1a%rs mal,c= y is;D i cst1Gn to ai r s'd dines, The t n.a;".t�,.= � .- td z the s ��^� f+.fi:# t F� �'oasma? 1. �iu7t; ?:431?' ex ?Ci e'r� ts;1E: c3:�:)... pl cation ' o [��. a resubdIlvision sand a m tiOn 'sei? %3 C.roduced by Comiiils. .--;Iczne 11'en e:.:,9 an,, seconded. by Coillmioslor' + ieder:i-cliFsa that the nesubdiv7_sio46 as submi-L.tod be L'sp-ii'?'oved. Flotion ur..animoua d y on .rol..l call of r, embers p_TV'werat o FLgAL FV €' - A SSIO ,D ATED ALE)LAAZ3ER _TNDUSTR-fFa. . 1'j-da p Fov8.,".'`s%S'p`cL'cdt'�_IdU°ye?'.r.3I Pa r! o a. i°�e "-,—I f'": y. map of .!%Ssoci ated—Ale�::ander lrr_eftua -!� al Pa3'}L (foSme.{°ly, Rardes Aylala. Industrial Park), submitted at the last study meetine; by kl o Jack Dovey, , en.gslicer, representing David and 011:, ,er A, Bavif, E, and the Associated Construction and Engineering CoFE3pany, , i;ao given f Farther consideration. The Plau ring Consultfant and the City Engineer, In reply to Chairman Martins Indicated approval of the reap. In discussing the proposal with Mr. Dovey, Commissioner Dlederics?sea and Chairwan Martin .voiced opposition to the excessive lerl6th of the cul-de-sac, In additions Commissioner Dieder:ichsen. criticized what he termed "poor engineering" in the lay -out of certain of the lots Commissioner Henderson stated -that in his opinion the cul-de-sac was not objectionable in an industrial development. A motion was introduced by Commissioner Henderson, seconded by Commissioner Kindig that the map as submitted be recommended to the City Council for adoption. Roll call Mote was recorded as follows: AYES: COhMISSIONERS: Henderson, Kindiga Stivers NOES: COPIVIISSI0AERS: Diedericheen9 INartin ABS:c1\1T- C01*11SSION RS : F2nger, Norberg -2- . Z_,.4 2_1 ..:. '.;s , J , HOO ER L°a.E : PROPOSTED STED 3:v,r� , RK� OIG AREA FIRST C!-!` RCH 01.1 Cii_RysT A tioa ing was hall ork the request of Co J. Hooper, as agent `'or the First Churoh of Christ Scientist Ln Burlingame, for ta peg -m it, to >?.'. a:gs tia Church parking are -La. _ * ;Dnd.ance p e-advi t3ed t at1 thr,,r ; et a.x. ol t.3 tde rKa..3r area( tb ^�i�Cay.4°` � �Vr {a L .i or. �ssi, L:' ��gl„„ocllz G7 ,ita. __, ? i r_ _ .._. 'ae`ie,( ti�ti4.�div s._. �3. � E �?Z._J. CA ie 4,.yas cont-,. rac.:.ec, ro s�,:.uLi� _ . 4✓ �a ..... ._y �' i n. .. e:- . 'u.> ?.�ptz t' � � ��'+. ri •? �.`-a� o �.` i'dC !i .,s u3. �� _., .'.,1�%' .D. L h.? F. �?`G,.Z 3. �a �-i'. Lr .: E 2_ (,+.._. r.s z-. a ..' � ._ o' . _... � '✓ Flyy o d '4" e s f n'�' n ce ��s, �r'r.'. c`."�.i !��:4 5 .i.:..�: ;..✓ L +.". a.,. a y S <.' F'1�. "l.�`}� 'li",. da?_�J I�� .�a54%�.'f i. '.. .-!3Lam,. S'` "a �_..! if! .rl�. a....... e.D �_.,�. .a:"t?.`�_'', �.° oo-r rio of Dt .��.:�. � o t a ,-A E:tz k3tu�'e" 1-kas baon., the entire loci will €',.e3 utsul izeu, In .i'a e.i_ to inquiries cifn peal .^- . s i o, � i r, .- tex�. ncr ool icie =Jir. Hooper stated t'aaat there will be an �.t tendaat• u oa dty at all ti ma,s that the .lot is in use sand„ in addition, a barrier i,,,Ill be constructed across the Yloribunda Avenue- entrance Go discourage tn�s alas ing and prevent the use of the area as a 1D 1:,hrougl-i- a,,v4R between 0a ' : G a-•o ire venue and Floribunda A venue ., .€e: ., wF,'_�"'ope:"tb s' ii't-'d=2kev°a addressed the Commission, stating hiks o'c ee, :.ons to an open parkin; lot. Mr. -Lauder suggested that the area by fenced - nd a permanent entre.nce gate installed; further, than proper landscaping; be provided. Mr. F�T,b>c,nk ` U8 ,_,ke a speakingin behalf of the, F+p.irst C'hu3:,0''`:_ of Christ Scia-atsst, urged Commission aporoval of the ,appl c-EI-LI"oil stat,1nz that the neecf for additional parkin6 facilities is critical. Questioned by Chairman lh%rtin concerning the proposed uEe, Planning eeo'r'zu1-`,,an.t p4Ia° I`33�! made ":ohs`. f o E loll,ii ng poin.ts : (1) Under the provisions of the Ordinance„ the property iwty be properly used for a- p arking lot; (2) Parking; spcaces must not extend within the establishes: setback linen; (3) Properly, the entrance should be on Yloribunda .Avenue and the exit Oak Grove Avenue; (4) The area should be adequately fenced including a gate; (5) A three Foot strip along the side line must be planted and main tained; (6) A satisfactory parking pattern must be established. Mr. 14.an.n stated that the proposal has merits provided that it Is properlydesigned and operated and suggested that the Commission withhold action until the applicant has submitted a plan describing the parking facilities now available for the existing apartment buildir ; as well as what is proposed for the Church, Piro Nikola Arnaut, owner of property located at 1514 Floribunda Avenue, addressed the Commission presenting his ob- jections to the location of a parking lot on a residential street where heavy automobile traffic is presently a problem. After some further discussion, members agreed to withhold action until the regular. _meeting of October 2 , 1957, and requested the applicant to present at'. that: ,time a detailed plan of the pro- posal. m3® 5. SPECIAL IAL P;; R��i_L`.P CI+I 4Ujl' OIL COPY! FOR ; U ,1STRUC`i`:F' A� i1-o"t LIT' � 14EW--CHISUA OLLE (LU' HT� _ n-- ►1 .Is I�.ST!z'1_;Ld i__:_�U, 1 '..yy X?C' �' f'! 4^dry held 1}� �. G ::'fi 11O, 4: �3 t,i'e Un �.o�'L Qj'?. CO ?}Zc�12;�z f C,t' �+ specl-a land located at the sou' heastrc.,-r y cor.t-ar of ne lnte-osecti.on of El Camino Heal and Murchison _ p3_va, mro ir'o..3seph O9A L.+i 1 -�-4 pr ska+ata li i'e E. 2 tha -UAionzQJU'; a s.•te-,n a'aceg .--idv:. ssd, .. � �'€ y� `t w;aa p�y t-:--,.,. 1_;;.a�.t:,:a'. K.r * Jti'l s.L �. C.sS% S.e L_.. 1� t,,� P- C��d,:e`st t-o �`�? � � 'iv '�� #s �lr";uitS: ( 0 -J.y ill � 4 �.ai e'',l ii?v 'y n �%r559 c��o. } icp.,�.r(E� d nr. p.J'Aell stated Nx�Y�'uf�;�?a tL%11.+• il-1 i c(.jm�lpc:cjay is now prepa eO o proceed wi'n Construction. U ;re were no orotests to ihu Ei ppZ lc t +.ca€3 and a motion was i Y?. - troduced by Commissioner Xindig, seconded by Commissioner Dlodel:-xGhsej� that the special permit be granted, Motion carried unanimously on roll call of members present,, C01y&1Ui4 ICA TIUAS 10 '1'OWA OF €•iIUSHOROUGH RE: IZO KR.ILOVF PROPr:xR`VYT-, A oommunicatlon dated August 28s 1957,, was Tread from Aorman do Sti.ene, City Manager, Toi:n of Hillsborough,, requesting that the Planning Commission reconsider an action take;a. W-Ider date of Decembe ° 12, 1954, whereby the City of Burlingame approved a resub- divisi,on of the property of Leo Kriloff, 2315 Eaton Drive,, Burlingaae The Planning Consultant advised that Mr. St sene ,.gas on vacation and would not be present at this meeting, Mr. Kriloff , in attendance, In response to Commission questioning, advised that there is no access to the rear lot on his property from Easton Drive and he had requested permission from the `sown of Hillsborough to construct an access way into said lot over a parcel of land owned by him within the Hillsborough limits. The City Council of Hillsborough under date of August 27, 1957, denied his request, Continuing, Mr. Kriloff requested a statement, from the members of the Commission relative to Mr. Sti.ene°s request for a revocation of the resubdivisiono In discussing the matters Commissioners indicated that they would not be in favor of rescinding the original action which approved the re - subdivision, Questioned by Commissioners, the PlanninL Consultant advised that It was doubtful, that the Planning Commission has the authority, after once approving a resubdivision, to arbitrarily change lot lines, except where a request is made by the property owner, The communication was thereafter referred to the regular meeting of October 28, 1957, to permit Mr. Stiene an opportunity to be in attendance and present his views. ot�o c , SA, lu:' mot} CQUATY ADVINOKY' A WaCQUI 711 R�' 1,111 3`�' r'[ :.—,1?1.110— T e, A communication € as read from the Saa hateo County Advisory latinil'x•,2, Council requesting an ea or sement from the City of Planning Commission of a planw':er bit the San hLteo Or<Z€nty= ,Peru+,?.`? g Commission? will apply to ?:ho Housing and Home Vinonao zgeney for a supplementary grant to pepm t the extension of the ,: _ de mastsxx Plan project for those months after the 03t"`'-- 31, 19 :E:PIi?_ais .'t._.Y'? date, ry o 'i awbar - 7.F ram' ebsew% Wair approval of%he EasterPlan project a&'— oK" a mo!vion introduced i✓duced by �r�.�.''! m i ���e.'J.�.�' °s.cr He`�de is 3 e5��e�t Z ,,,,yy �a 3 .. �1.._.� ri.� Vo1..i_�C.I t�}�. Co-n�l.�'IF-,,s ~,oa�':r r _D�.:�-,Lda 4 cL sena � {L�r VcC �� �cct � d to be transmitted Go the Advisory Planning Council endorsing the continvation of the prcaanvV For the information of the Commissioners, Planning Consultant Mann submitted detailed drawings and plans of the motor hotel proposed to be constructed can property located on the Ba;yshore Highway by the Don Hawley Enterprises) Wo. The meeting was thereafter after regularly adjourned at 9:50 p = Respectfully submitted; Everett V ?; indig Secretary -5-