Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1955.12.27CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting December 27, 1955 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT Henderson Diederichsen City Attorney - Karme: Kindig Mattock Plan. Consult.- Mann Martin Mitchell Dir.Pub.Wrks. - Marr Stivers Meeting called to order at 8:05 p.m,(; Chairman Henderson presiding. In the absence of Secretary Diederichsen, the Chair appointed Com- missioner Martin acting Secretary. Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of December 12 approved as written. Minutes of the study meeting of December 12 approved as written. HEARINGS: 1. RECLASSIFICATION Lots 17 through 28, Block 9, Mills Estate No. 3 - from R-2 to R-1. Application of David A. Nicolaides and Hamilton Hatfield. Chairman Henderson announced that this was the time set for the public hearing on the above reclassification. Mr. Nicolaides advised the Commission that ten of the planned 12 single- family dwellings were under construction. The request for rezoning was made to ensure that this area remains R-1. There being no objections, it was moved by Commissioner Kindig and seconded by Commissioner Stivers that the Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of the reclassification as requested. Motion carried unanimously on roll call of members. 2. RECLASSIFICATION Lots 14, 159 160 170 18, 199 200 21, 239 24 Block No, 2. Lots 5, 8, 9, 10, 110 12, 13 Block No. 3. Easton Addition No. 1 Subdivision from R-2 to R-3. Application of Ruth A. Hergert. Chairman Henderson announced that this was the time set for the public hearing on the above reclassification. Planning Consultant Mann presented to the Commission several maps of the area showing that the single-family occupancy is in the minority. Mr. Paul Eder, 1117 Laguna Avenue, advised the Commission that all of the property owners who had signed the petition accompanying the ap- placation for reclassification were in agreement that the rezoning should be made. There being no objections presented, it was moved by Commissioner Martin and seconded by Commissioner Kindig that the reclassification as requested be recommended to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously on roll call of members. 3. RECLASSIFICATION Lots 8,9,10,11,12,13,g2 - Block No. 2; Lots 3,4,6,7 - Block No. 3. Easton Addition No. 1-Subdivision from R-2 to R-3. Chairman Henderson announced that this was the time set for the public hearing on the above reclassification, proposed by the'Planning Commission to establish a uniform zoning in the area. There being no objections presented, it was moved by Commissioner Martin and seconded by Commissioner Kindig that the reclassification as proposed be recommended to the City Council for approval. Motion carried unanimously on roll call of members. PETITIONS: 1. FINAL MAP: Skyview Terrace. (Walter Thompson development west of Skyline Boulevard.) Director of Public Works Marr advised the Commission that the final map is not ready. There are some changes to be made by the sub- divider and it was thereafter agreed by the Commission to hold the matter until the final map is completed and presented for approval. COMMUNICATIONS: 1. A letter was read from the SAN MATEO COUNTY ADVISORY PLANNING COUNCIL expressing appreciation to the Commission for the interest and participation of Commissioner Kindig in the activities of the Council during the past"year. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Jack Gardner - proposed drive-in dry cleaning store California Drive and Murchison Drive. Secretary Martin read a communication from Mr. Gardner dated November 260 1955, requesting permission to establish a drive-in dry cleaning store at the above location. The Planning Consultant reminded the Commission that the location in question is C-1; the present ordinance places dry cleaning stores in a C-2 classification. The Commission must decide If the use is proper in a C-1 area. Mr. Gardner advised the Commission that a synthetic non-flammable solvent is used in his operations; that there is no noise or fumes. -2- He Iresented to the Commission pictures of the type of building contemplated and stated the proposed operation is similar to that operated by him on Broadway for the past 6 years. It was thereafter agreed that Mr. Gardner should present to the Commission at the meeting of January 9, 1956, more detailed in- formation, particularly with reference to type of solvents used, fire hazard, fire inspection service, etc., so that the Commission might determine the compatibility of use with other C-1 classifications. There being no further matters for discussion, the meeting was regularly adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, R.D. MARTIN Sedretary pro tern