Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 073-1953RESOLUTION NO. 73-53 DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF BUPLINGAME OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "THE SCOFIELD PROPERTY" AND TIXING TIME AND PLACE WHEN AND WHERE ANY PERSON MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD HOT BE ANNTI AED WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Council requesting the annexation to the City of Burlingame of certain uninhabited territory, the boundaries of which are in said petition and hereinafter described and which is designated as the "Scofield Property," and which said territory is situate in the County of San Mateo, State of California and is contiguous to the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the said petition was signed by the owners of the land to be annexed and which said persons represent all of the land according to the last preceding equalized assessment roll of San Mateo County; NOW, THEREFORE, Monday, the 16th day of November, 1953, at the hour of eight o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City :,all, in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California, is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where all persons having any objections to the proposed annexation may appear and show cause why such territory should not be annexed. Theterritory herein referred to consists of that real property in the County of San Mateo, State of California, particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the northerly right- of-way line of Hillside Drive, said point being the most westerly corner of Lot No. 7, Block No. 1, as shown on said Nap of Burlin- game Hills No. 2; thence from said point of beginning N 190 57' E 1L1.00 feet along the westerly boundary of said Lot No. 7; thence N 650 09' 50" W 119.63 feet, said course being partially contiguous to the corporate limit line of the City of Burlingame; thence continuing along last said corporate limit line of City of Burlingame the following courses and distances: S 860 37t 30" W 68.39 feet, S 180 041 E 79.00 feet and $ 20 06t 07" W 80.87 feet to a point in the abovementioned norther-ly line of Hillside Drive; thence leaving last said corporate limit line of City of Burlingame, on a curve to the right in an easterly direction along the abovementioned northerly line of Hillside Drive, said curve having a radius of 397.50 feet, a central angle of 150 511 20" and an arc length of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning, and containing 0.479 acres of land, more or less. tieing all of Lot 8, Block 1, Burlingame Bills Sub- division No. 2, as recorded August 26, 1926, in Volume 14, pages 18 and 19 of maps of the County of San P4ateo records, State of California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be published in the Burlingame Advance -Stan„ a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California and in the Redwood City Tribute, a newspaper of general circulation printed in the City of Redwood City, County of San Hateo, State of California, once each week for two successive weeks prior to said hearing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petition for annexation be and the same is hereby referred to the Planning Commission of the City for immediate consideration and action and that its report thereon be made available before the date of the hearing, to -wit, November 16, 1953- U. S. Simonas, Jr. Mayor I. Herbert K. White, City Clerk, co hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held the 26th day of October, 1953, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Atwater -Byrd -(Morgan -Simonds NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ASSENT COUNCI:PIEN: Love Herbert K. White City Clerk