HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 084-1953RESOLUTION NO. 84-53
RESCINDING AND RECALLING ALL ACTION HERETOFORE
ORDERED AND DIRECTED IN RESOLUTION NO. 73-53 AND
DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXA-
TION TO THE CITY OF BURLINGAME OF CERTAIN UNIN-
HABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "THE SCOFIELD
PROPERT)" FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING ON
SAID PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, on October 26, 1953, the City Council directed and
ordered the giving of notice of proposed annexation to the City
of Burlingame of certain uninhabited territory designated as
"the Scofield Property" and fixing the time and place for the
hearing for said petition; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council that an error was
made in the publication of the notice and upon the suggestion of
the City Attorney a new notice should be given; and
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Council
requesting the annexation to the City of Burlingame of certain
uninhabited territory, the boundaries of which are in said
petition and hereinafter described and which is designated as
the "Scofield Property" and which said territory is situate in
the County of San Mateo, State of California and is contiguous
to the City of Burlingame; and
WHEREAS, the said petition was signed by the owners of the
land to be annexed and which said persons represent all of the
land according to the last preceding equalized assessment roll
of San Mateo County;
NOW, THEREFORE, Monday, the 21st day of December, 1953, at
the hour of eight o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall, in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State
of California, is hereby fixed as the time and place when and
where all persons having any objections to the proposed annexa-
tion may appear and show cause why such territory should not be
annexed.
The territory herein referred to consists of that real
property in the County of San Mateo, State of California,
I
particularly described as follows:
"BEGINNING at a point in the northerly right-cf-way
line of hillside Drive, said point being the most
westerly corner of Lot No. 7, Block No. 1, as shown
on said Map of Burlingame Hills No. 2; thence from
said point of Beginning N 190 57t E 141.00 feet
along the westerly boundary of said Lot No. 7;
thence N 65009f 50" W 119063 feet, said course
being partially contiguous to the corporate limit
line of the City of Burlingame; thence continuing
along last s aid -°oorporate limit line of City of
Burlingame the following courses and distances:
S 860 37' 30" W 68,39 feet, S 180 041 E 79.00
feet and S 20 08t 07" W 80.87 feet to a point in
the abovementioned northerly line of hillside Drive;
thence leaving last said c orpor. ste limit line of
City of Burlingame, Dn a curve to the right in an
easterly direction along the abovementioned north-
erly line of hillside Drive, said curve having a
radius of 397.50 feet, a central angle of 150 51,
20" and an are length of 110.00 feet to the point
of beginning, and containing 0.479 acres of land,
more or less. Being all of Lot 8, Block 1,
Burlingame Hills Subdivision No. 2, as recorded
August 26, 1926, in Volume 14, pages 18 and 19 of
maps of the County of San Viateo records, State of
California.'
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be pub -
lisped in the Burlingame Advance -Star, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed. and published in the City of Burlingame,
County of San Mateo, State of California and in the Redwood City
Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation printed in the City of
Redwood City, County of San I`iateo, State of California, once each
week for two successive weeks prior to said hearing.
6,&If !�2>y
U. S. S imonds,
Mayor
I, Herbert K. White, City Clerk, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council held on the 16th day of November, 1I and adopted
reafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Atwater-Byrd-Morgan-aimonds
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: Love
erbert K. White, City Clerk