HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 008-1963RESOLUTION NO. 8-63
A RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS
BURLINGAME AVE14UE AREA
OFF-STREET PARKING DISTRICT
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame,
California, that
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 71-62 of this Council
ordering same, adopted on November 15, 1962, notice has been duly
given of the intention of this Council to change and modify the
proceedings under Resolution of Intention No. 27-62 adopted on
May 19, 1962, as modified; and
WHEREAS, persons interested appeared or filed written protests
against said proceedings or any part thereof and all persons desir-
ing to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all
tters and things pertaining to said changes and modifications
ere fully heard and considered by this Council.
NOW, THEREFORE,; IT IS ORDERED, that:
1. All protests and objections be, and they are hereby,
loverruled.
2. The changes and modifications in the proceedings under
I said Resolution of Intention be made and had, all as more particu-
larly set forth as follows, to -wit:
a) Change and modify the boundaries of the assessment
Idistrict, the assessment and the assessment diagram to delete from
Isaid district those certain lots or parcels of land, as follows,
Ito -wit:
All of Lot 1, Block 4, Burlingame Land Co.,
except that portion improved and used as a
gasoline service station.
b) Change and modify the acquisitions to be made, the
work to be done and the plans and specifications therefor, as
follows, to -wit:
i. Eliminate all of tarcels 1-H and 2-H and
substitute in place thereof all of Lots
5 and 6, Block 3, Burlingame Park.
ii. Enlarge that portion of proposed Parking
Lot E (1-E and 6-E) fronting on Lorton
Avenue to include an additional parcel of
land and the improvements thereon with
approximately 80 feet of frontage on
Lorton Avenue and a depth of 150 feet
lying adjacent to and northwesterly of
said existing proposed portion of Lot E.
iii. Eliminate all of Lot 16, Block 10, Town
of Burlingame and substitute in place
thereof Lot 14, Block 10, Town of
Burlingame.
iv. Eliminate Lots 1-A, 2-A and 3-A fronting
on Bellevue Avenue except that portion of
Lot 3-A southeasterly of and behind Lot
4-A (50 feet wide, more or less) on through
to Lots 5-A and 6-A.
v. Eliminate all of Lot 6-F.
c) Change and modify the proposed credits against
assessments for existing parking facilities as contained in the
application for credit filed by Ray Wurlitzer, as follows, to -wit:
Allow credit for all landscape areas, walls,
and walks, but not truck loading and access
way area at southwesterly corner of the property.
d) Increase Assessment No. 48 in accordance with the
letter from Wilsey, Ham & Blair dated December 5, 1962, a copy of
which is hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference.
3. The Engineer of Work is hereby directed to make said
changes on the face of his report or file a supplement thereto
reflecting said changes, and to recompute the estimate of cost and
redistribute the assessment at the new rates resulting from said
changes.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct
cony of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Burlingame, California, at a meeting thereof held on
the 23rd day of January , 1963, by the following vote:
AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmen:
Crosby, Johnson, Lorenz, Martin, Morgan.
h ;S, Councilmen: None
ABSENT, Councilmen:None
APPROVED:
City Clerk of the City of Burlingame
2
t
7L.1��cs�.�r��1 -r es( 7C!C�i cd, c� +l oo �L is
v V L l 8
L..j
RCPLY TO i-iillprae
The Honorable City Council
City of Burlingame
City Hall
Burlingame, California
December 5, 1962
LEE E. HAM
CHARLES T. BLAIR
GORDON A. TILLSON
JACK E. VAN ZANDT
GEORGE W. POTTER
WILLIAM B. WRIGHT
GEORGE S. GATTER
AUGUST W. COMPTON
Reference: Parking District No. 1, Telephone Company Assessment
Gentlemen:
The property owner's petition, the City Council's Resolution of
Intention, and the Engineer's Report prepared pursuant thereto
all provide for an adjustment in the land assessed valuation of
the property of the Pacific Telephone Company. This adjust;:ient
was based on the premise that property evaluated by the State
Board of Equalization was on the basis of 50'o of market value
rather than 21.1;0, as is the case with locally assessed property.
ivider_ce introduced at the hearing, particularly the assessments
_levied against comparably sized and situated property, has let us
to conclude that this premise was false and that public utility
property is assessed by the State at something less than 505 of
fair market value.
In order to equalize the Telephone Company assessment with the
others in the project on a fair and reasonable basis, we have
co_raputed the area of the Telephone Company parcel and that of
the adjacent three parcels to the East fronting on Burlingame
Avenue and we find that the Telephone Company area is 28,E-10
square feet and that the neighboring parcels have 30,210 square
feet.
The original assessment against the latter was $33,124, or $1.0965
per square foot. Applying this original square foot rate to the
Telephone Company lard area of 28,410, the original Telephone Company
assessment would have been $31,152. This is the assessment which
would have resulted from a land assessed valuation of $42,909.
SAN FRANCISCC CFF'IC' • 1 1 1 R o l l i n s R o a d • M i l l b r a e, C a l i f. • OX 7-4081
LCS ANCiELES OFFICE 0 '758 W. COlOr8.Ci0:SIV1., •Los Angeles 41, Calif. • CL 7-8161
• Y _ .; _ -2-
�oer 5, 1962
71he Honorable City Council
City of Burlingame
It is, therefore, recommended that the land assessed valuation of
the Telephone Company parcel be ordered increased from 06,250
(used in the original spread) to $42,909 and that the latter figure
be used in all subsequent assessment computations.
Very truly yours,
ialLSEY, FLAN & BUIR
By , v
engineer /off' Work