Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 017-2001 RECOPDING REQUESTED BY: r Planning Department DOC #i 2001-026408 City of Burlingame 03/02/2001 11:58A R1 Fee:NC Page 1 of 3 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Recorded in Official Records PLANNING DEPARTMENT County of San MateoWarren Slocum CITY OF BURLINGAME Assessor-Countyy Clerk-Recorder 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Recorded By BURLINGAME CITY BURLINGAME,CA 94010 I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Resolution No. 17-2001 1205 HOWARD AVENUE; APN: 029-224-050 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 02.21.01 �)dMITA-61A)J l, MargarA Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND PARKING VARIANCE AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 17-2001 RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a parkin variance amendment to extend the days of operation for an existing retail and food establishment at 1205 Howard Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea B, Roberta Oswald,property owner, APN: 029-224-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 12, 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances, is hereby approved. 2. Said parking variance amendment is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such parking variance amendment are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. Itis further directed that a certified copy of this resolution b recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. I, Joe Bojues ,Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burling e, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February, 2001 ,by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DEAL, DREILING, VISTICA AND LUZURIAGA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOJUES AND KEIGHRAN ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER: OSTERLING Id ACT GSECRET Y ;11 illi II It ill R1 Pa9e: 2 0` 3 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and parking variance amendment. 1205 Howard Avenue effective February 20, 2001 1. that the food establishment on this premise shall conform to the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 24, 1991, that the food establishment shall not exceed 475 SF including kitchen and seating area although the 320 SF seating area with eight tables may move within the retail area, the second floor shall only be used for storage related to the business on the first floor, and there shall be no office use on the second floor; 2. that there shall be no more than two employees on site working in the food establishment portion of the business; 3. that the food establishment portion of the business may not be open for business except during the hours of 11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., seven days a week; 4. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 5. that any expansion of the seating area, kitchen, food preparation area and service area, change in the number of employees in the food establishment or upgrading of the kitchen area shall require an amendment to this permit; and 6. that this permit shall be reviewed for compliance with its conditions in one year(February, 2002) and upon complaint thereafter. f` •�J ��I� Ii�; 1 `` i;���� � �sp@ 'li; a ;`�I' I .�fiJ?:3� _..�:'�3�FF3£3 R: Page. 3 of 3��