Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 084-2001 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 'Planning Department DOC tt 2 0 0 2—0 8$2 8 0 City of Burlingame 05/06/2002 12:04P R1 Fee:NC Page 1 of 7 WHEN RECORDED MAII.TO: Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo PLANNING DEPARTMENT Warren Slocum CITY OFBURLINGAME Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Recorded By PLANNING DEPT CITY OF BURLINGAI BURLINGAME,CA 94010 I 11 I1111il �111111111111:1111111111111111111111111111 Resolution No. 84-2001 1361 DESOTO AVENUE; APN: 027-152-050 TITLE OF DOCUMENT '3r I hereby certify this to be a full,true and correct copy of the document it purports to be,the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 10.20.01 Margar Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION.84.2001 RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1361 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, John and Cathy Garagozzo property owners APN: 027-152-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on September 10, 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3 - construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Joseph Bojues , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10"' day of September, 2001 ,by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Bojues, Keighran, Luzuriaga and Vistica NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Commissioner Abstaining: Osterling S E CVZTP 111111 11111 IN 111111$11111111111111111111114IIIII 2000 z 1of 7 2.04P v� EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review. 1361 De Soto Avenue effective September 17, 2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped September 4, 2001 (sheets A.1-A.6 and L-1), and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the detached two-car garage shall contain two single-wide doors separated by a column between the doors; 4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Recycling Specialist's July 23, 2001, memos shall be met; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIII�IIIIIII ?0023 004P 11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0022 004P Rt Page 4 of , ROUTING FORM DATE: July 19, 2001 TO: ✓u 1} _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal _Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1361 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-152-050. STAFF REVIEW: Monday,July 23, 2001 Reviewed By: Y, 11 Date of Comments: -f f-3/c:) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name:�t4 , ,� , Project Address: h( The following requirements apply to the project 1 A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 2 V` The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateraltW is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7• Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9• Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. I llilli llill lili llilll 111111 Jill 1Jill 2002512 0 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic 6 and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and MN provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. Wa 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil COon ON- N0 engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations o must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse moaimpact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic N©� calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. _ 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers _ Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 V The project shall comply with the City's NPDES tys Permit requirement q irement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 _ The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Illlllllllllllllllllllllllliillllllll{Ililllllllilillll z@0 0?12:04P ROUTING FORM DATE: July 19, 2001 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal ✓recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review for a new two story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1361 De Soto Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 027-152-050. STAFF REVIEW: Monday,July 23, 2001 kms- llt,� 1; Ck- to A 5k PO4ell?� r -G-a- kb,�� ,Q-e,o tii c,.J C,1�14f�r_t4.e_ aJ_ c,.,?e r c_70 r jv P,6� S f� Reviewed By: 2 Date of Comments: