Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 092-2001 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: DOC 2 0@ 2—O 9 19 3 4 Planning Department 05/09/2002 12 : 18P R1 Fee :NC City of Burlingame Page 1 of 7 Recorded in Official Records WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: County of San Mateo Warren Slocum PLANNING DEPARTMENT Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder CITY OFBURLINGAME Recorded By 501 PRIMROSE ROAD ��� fiIIBURLINGAME, CA 940101 111111111111 s I I 1 IN , Resolution No. 92-2001 333 LORTON AVENUE; APN: 029-151-110 �7r TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 11.05.01 j/ 7-0, erne_'T Margaret; onroe, City Planner �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I 2002-091 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�II 05/PagQpCz o2 'BP 934 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW ------------ RESOLUTION—92-2001 RESOLVED,by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for commercial design review for a chane to mothathe re n 50%of existing facade at 333 Lorton Avenin.zoned C-1. Subarea B 1 333 Lorton LLC nronerty owner APN• 029-151-1-1-0; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October,at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW,THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commissiondiat: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption,per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1 - (e) additions to existing structures proV*d the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures beffte the addition. 2. Said commercial design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exiirit"A" attached hereto. Findings for such commercial design review are as set forth in the minutes and revading of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded ie official o s of the County of San Mateo. C IRM Js-3e"01 I, Joey S-, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,do hemcertify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Cwnw ion held on the 9th day of October, 2001 ,by the following vote: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: Auran,Bojues,Keighran,Key Mink, Osterling and VIOV ' NOES:COMMISSIONERS: NONE l ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 4SECRE' 1 111111111111IIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11III� 20Page 023 of '2 18P 1 93 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for commercial design review 333 Lorton Avenue effective October 15, 2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped September 12, 2001, sheets A.0, Al.1 and A.3 and date stamped September 28, 2001, sheet A.2, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to commercial design review; 3. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's September 13, 2001 memo and the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, and Recycling Specialist's September 17, 2001, memos shall be met; 4. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. I lIII IIIIIIIIli IIII IIIIIII,IIIIIIilllillllillll Z 00 02 Page 4 o0�P1g3`} f 7 ROUTING FORM DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official ✓'Fire Marshal _Recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review to remodel an existing commercial building at 333 Lorton Avenue, zoned C-2, Subarea Bl, APN: 029-151-110. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, September 17, 2001 6 n'J Y6 L uqc Reviewed By: Date of Comments: �� /�— 11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� 20025 0091 934 ROUTING FORM DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: ✓City Eni neer I _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review to remodel an existing commercial building at 333 Lorton Avenue, zoned C-2, Subarea B1, APN: 029-151-110. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, September 17, 2001 01 -4A Reviewed By: Date of Comments: TI(Z/o C5/C9/2002 o09P 93� ROUTING FORM DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: _City Engineer Chief Building Official _Fire Marshal _Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review to remodel an existing commercial building at 333 Lorton Avenue, zoned C-2, Subarea B1, APN: 029-151-110. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, September 17, 2001 Ile q- zcs5-(6,14a vnloa®,y SPa — ° S?S m� l�f'?1 dr1��'JLIySIGx� Gons�zdn.�'S . o O 61LCmc K 1 Reviewed By: Date of Comments: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 20Page: 7 @©Z 12 o091 934 ROUTING FORM DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official _Fire Marshal ✓Recycling Specialist _Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review to remodel an existing commercial building at 333 Lorton Avenue, zoned C-2, Subarea B1, APN: 029-151-110. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, September 17, 2001 s� Reviewed By: Date of Comments: D