Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 097-2001 RECORD NG REQUESTED BY: - - - DOC p 2002-091930 Planning Department 05/09/2002 12 : 18P R1 Fee :NC City of Burlingame Page I of 9 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo PLANNING DEPARTMENT Warren Slocum CITY OFBURLINGAME assessor-County Clerk-Recorder Recorded By AT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD I I Ili i+ BURLINGAME,CA 94010 Resolution No. 97-2001 17r 325 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE; APN: 028-312-010 TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 11.06.01 hm%& 'Wor" Marg et Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT RESOLUTION—97,2001 RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review and a special permit height for a new two-story house with detached garage at 325 Occidental Avenue zoned R-1 T Coniffe c/o Forbairt, L.L.C.property owner. APN: 028-312-010; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 22. 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment,and categorical exemption,per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303- Class 3- construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said design review and special permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. -WILI.> CHAIRMAN 1, Joseph Boues -, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October, 2001 ,by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran, Bojues, Keighran, Key Mink and Osterling NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Vistica SECRET Y 11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIII1IIII 0 00 02 1Z09P1930 Page: 2 of 9 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for design review and a special permit for height 325 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 5,2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 15, 2001, sheets 1 through 6, and sheets 1.1 and 1.2, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, and City Recycling Specialist's August 20, 2001, memos shall be met; 4. that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; 5. that the approval of Building Department demolition and construction permits shall be subject to a Certified Arborist's report addressing the condition of the two substantial Black Acacia trees existing in the side yard on the site and to the approval of a Protected Tree Removal Permit Application by the Parks Department; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III R1 Page:200 0 3 12:18P 930 ROUTING FORM DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: ✓C�i y Engineer;, _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 325 Occidental Avenue,zoned R-1,APN:028-312-010. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 20, 2001 li1111!111111!llllllli1111illllllliillllllllllllilllill 2000 2 o09P 93© Reviewed By: V- V. Date of Comments: ���/� r' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: ijhi Project Address: The following requirements apply to the project 375 Occ t( 7 1 '✓ A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the / building permit issuance.) 2 i/ The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 A sanitary sewer lateral is required for the project in ary �tL q p � accordance with the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project. 9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 200©5 1of 9 2:18P 0 Page I of 3 UAprivate development\PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 111111111IIII 2000 6 0091 930 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. 12 Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. 13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees,and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. 22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 UAprivate developmenAPLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ` IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��ll�lllllfllll� 05/0912002 12 R1 Page 7 1091 930 f 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 23 The back of the driveway/sidewalkapproach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. 24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. 25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 UAprivate developmentTLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ROUTING FORM DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: _City Engineer ✓ 'def Building Official `z Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 325 Occidental Avenue,zoned R-1,APN:028-312-010. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 20, 2001 �4�.�� 2 Cxi7 Ni I�IIII�III�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi 200 0B o091 93[A Reviewed By: l?� Date of Comments: ��y ROUTING FORM DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: _City Engineer _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal ecychng Specialist': ! Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review and special permit for height for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 325 Occidental Avenue,zoned R-1,APN:028-312-010. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, August 20, 2001 II IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 200 09 1of 9 2.18P P1 Reviewed By: �� DateofComments: 9A6 n J