HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 055-1999 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department I DOC a 19 9 9— 1310 01
City of Burlingame I 08/02/1999 11 : 06A RI Fee : NC
Page 1 of 7
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: I Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
PLANNING DEPARTMENT I Warren Slocum
CITY OF BURLINGAME I Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder
501 PRIMROSE ROAD I Recorded By
BURLINGAME, CA 94010 I I III II III 1I)
III ,
Resolution No. 55-99
18 DWIGHT ROAD; APN: 029-301-190
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in
my office.
Date: 05.18.99
Margaret Monroe, City Planner
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FRONT SETBACK, DECLINING
HEIGHT ENVELOPE VARIANCES AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLUTION-55-99
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for front
setback and declining height envelope variances for a first and second story addition subject to design review
at 18 Dwight Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-301-190; James and Mary Shannon, property owners;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on May
10, 1999, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per
Article 19. Section: 15303 - Class 3 - construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities
or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such
units is hereby approved.
2. Said front setback, declining height envelope variances and design review is approved, subject
to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such front setback, declining height
envelope variance and design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
C
I, STANLEY VISTICA , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held onht a 10th day of May, 1999 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOJUES, DEAL, KEIGHRAN, LUZURIAGA, VISTICA, DREILING AND COFFEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
SECTARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, front setback,declining height envelope and
design review.
18 DWIGHT ROAD
effective May 17, 1999
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped April 20, 1999, sheets Al, El, E2, and A3, and date stamped May 3,
0 1999,sheets A2,A2.1 and A6,and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the
Sa building shall require an amendment to this permit, and the second floor plate shall be
Mo, 8 feet and the plate for the bow window shall be 8'-9";
I�m
0m 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the fust or second floors, which would
0 include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural
mop features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that a"water table"detail shall be added horizontally around the building below the fust
floor window sill line and that its placement shall be reviewed and approved by the
project design reviewer prior to issuing a building permit;
4. that the requirements of the City Engineer's March 2, 1999 memo and the Chief Building
Official's April 15, 1999 memo shall be met;and
5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1995 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 22, 1999
TO: CITY ENGINEER''
" CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL—FIRE FRE MARSHAL
9¢ SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
mol CITY ATTORNEY
"�_0 —
�ma
mm FROM: CITY PLANNERIPLANNER
m
m
N A
moa
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a second-story addition at 18 Dwight
Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-301-190.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING:
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, March 1, 1999
THANKS,
Maureen/Janice/Ruben Date of Comments
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 22, 1999
TO: CITY ENGINEER
" CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
B —FIRE MARSHAL
OQ SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
Mom" CITY ATTORNEY 0 —
0
�MW
MM FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
m
ry m
moa
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a second-story addition at 18 Dwight
Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-301-190.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING:
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, March 1, 1999
THANKS,
Maureen/Jani Ruben w Date of Comments
�) W�llr4j'dpeS`S�eDOY
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 22, 1999
TO: CITY ENGINEER'
_CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
" _FIRE MARSHAL
9 SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
0
"a CITY ATTORNEY
ft
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
�m
miry
mea SUBJECT: Request for design review for a second-story addition at 18 Dwight
Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-301-190.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING:
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, March 1, 1999
THANKS,
Maureen/Janice/Ruben Date of Comments
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 22, 1999
TO: CITY ENGINEER
" CHIEF BUILDING OFFICLk
m _FIRE MARSHAL
ma —SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
Mo CITY ATTORNEY
_ o
�
0m FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
m
�rvti
SUBJECT: Request for design review for a second-story addition at 18 Dwight
Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-301-190.
SCHEDULED PLANNING COMNIISSION ACTION MEETING:
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, March 1, 1999
THANKS,
Maureen/Jani Ruben Date of Comments
� Qy�
too✓� C-> 4- ( S
Llw) ,
.�� +�1asa,.tfY Gl►`�au`'eY cz h