Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 197-2000 RECC'ZIaNG REQUESTED BY: Planning Department DOC is 2000-153038 City 4 Burlingame 12/05/2000 11:46A RI Fee:NC Page 1 of 4 Wt T RECORDED MAIL TO: -�. Recorded in Official Records PLANNING DEPARTMENT County of San Mateo Warren Slocum CITY OF BURLINGAME Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Recorded By CITY OF BURLINGAME BURLINGAME,CA 94010 Resolution No. 197-2000 832 FAIRFIELD DRIVE; APN: 029-013-400 TITLE OF DOCUMENT ,' I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 11.21.00 lflw&ih� Margaret Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE,AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE RESOLUTION-114'2000 RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review,floor area ratio variance and special permit for declining height envelope for a first and second story addition at 832 Fairfield Road zoned R-1 APN: 029-013-400: Todd Varland and Amy Welch, property owners; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on November 13, 2000,at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1 - (e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said design review, floor area ratio variance, and special permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit"A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review,floor area ratio variance, and special permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be r corded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. c CHAI I,Ann Keighran, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13" day of November, 2000 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOJUES, DEAL, DREILING, KEIGHRAN, OSTERLING, VISTICA AND LUZURIAGA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE SECRETAKY (( i _ 9, �y e�� � {i� � �' f � � ��, ; q •ate 1 n- i liil�Pli �llYl� � 11� � 1111QY1,2$� i:1 P �. 1 1t ii PaJe 2 , EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption,design review, floor area ratio variance, and special permit for declining height envelope. 832 FAIRFIELD ROAD effective November 20, 2000 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 26, 2000, sheets A.1 - A.4, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3. that the City Engineer's August 28, 2000,memo shall be met; 4. that the variance for floor area ratio is being granted by the City because of a pre-existing condition on the property, which would impose an unfair burden on the owner to correct or remove as part of remodel, however, this condition could have been corrected if the structure were demolished and replaced. Therefore, should the existing dwelling ever be demolished, the variance approved for floor area ratio shall automatically expire, and the owner may apply for a new variance or may improve the property so that it conforms to the Zoning Code requirements for floor area ratio. In this case, "demolished"means removal of greater than ten(10)percent or more in square footage of the exterior walls than was approved in this design review application; 5. that the family room shall never be used for sleeping purposes; and 6. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. I� i Ii� � I 1 t � t ��� y� C•^,�f3 ���S II I it.��IllliII IlT�' it ,y I I lint vi Fage. 3 c1 4 ROUTING FORM DATE: August 28, 2000 TO: CITY ENGINEER _CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL _FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review and floor area ratio variance for a first and second story addition at 832 Fairfield Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-013-400. SCIIEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, August 28, 2000 THANKS, Maureen/Erika/Ruben Date of Comments rcm�- �� P a A .