HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 033-2000 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department DOC p 2000-02-74s2
City of Burlingame
03/08/2000 11:58A R1 Fee:NC
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Page 1 of 2Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CounWarren Slocum
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SO1PRIIvIItOSEROAD Assessor-Countyy Clerk-Recorder
B1PRIMR PRIMROSE
EROA4o10 Recorded By BURLINGAME CITY PLANNING DEPT
III ! I
II
III
III
III
III
iI
II
II I
III
II
III
III
I I
II
II
it
Resolution No. 33-2000
1347 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE; APN: 026-121-070
AND
1369 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE; APN: 026-121-050
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in
my office.
Date: 02.08.00
Margaret Monroe, City Planner
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND DETERMINATION OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
RESOLUTION-33-2000
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and a request has been made for a
determination of general plan consistency for the proposed acquisition of property by the City of Burlingame
to reconstruct the City's cor2oration yard at 1347-1369 North Carolan Avenue, zoned M-1, Dorrit H. Hurt
Trs, 1244 Jackling Drive Burlingame, CA 94010. property owner, 1347 North Carolan, APN: 026-121-070
and Charles & Asta Huppe�._Trs. 428 Scenic Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611, property owner, 1369 North
Carolan Avenue;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
Januar)�31, 2000' at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and a categorical exemption, per
CERA Section 15302, Class 2(b), replacement or reconstruction of a commercial facility with a new facility
of substantially the same size, purpose and capacity is hereby approved.
2. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the Iand use designation and
policies of the City of Burlingame General Plan. Findings for such determination of general plan consistency
are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the o 'al records
of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIO
y
1, Ann Keighran, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 31st day of January , 2000 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Bojues, Dea-, Dreiling, Keighran, Vistica and Luzuriaga
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOND
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Osterling
SECRE
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII R1 Page:20000 o@2T 492