Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 121-2000 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Deparo t City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: DOC !f 2000-0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 05/17/2000 11:50q RS 5OZ 58308 CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROADPage 1 of 11 BURLINGAME,CA 94010 Reeorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-Countyy Clerk-Reeorder Recorded By BURLINGHME CITY PLANNING & DEP' 1111111 IIII 11111111 IIII VIII IIII 1111111 III IIID IIII IIII 4-0 Resolution No. 121-00 2100 POPPY AVENUE;APN:027-143-010 TITLE OF DOCUMENT RECEIVED JUN 2 9 2000 I hereby certify this to be a full,true CITY OF BURLINGAME and correct copy of the document it purports PLANNING DEPT. to be,the original of which is on file in my office. Date: OS 022..00 , %�n'1^ Margazet Monroe,City Planner RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO NEW TWO-STORY HOUSES, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT and FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE NEW HOUSE ON LOT B RESOLUTION 121 . 2000 RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a Conditional Use Permit for the Reemergence of Two Parcels, Design Review for Two New Two-Story Houses, Special Permits for Height. for both houses for the reemergence of two parcels, reconfiguration of lots, and construction of two new two-story houses at 2100 Poppy, Drive zoned R-1 ; Denise Lau eg nsen property owner; APN: 027- 143-010: WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 18, 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1 . On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per CEQA Section 15303, is hereby approved. 2. Said Conditional Use Permit, Design Review, Special Permit for Height, and Front Setback Variance are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Conditional Use Permit, Design Review and Special Permits for Height are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3 . It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. 2000-058308 11111 IN 11111111111111111111111 R5/ Page : 02 of 11 A SOA S' Y VISTICA, VI CHAIR I, Ann Kei hg ran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 18th day of April , 2000 , by the following vote: AYES : COMMISSIONERS : BOJUES , KEIGHRAN , VISTICA , OSTERLING . NOES : COMMISSIONERS : NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : DEAL AND DREILING ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS : . Luzuriaga ANN KEI , SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT 2100 POPPY DRIVE effective May 1, 2000 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted tot he Planning Department and date stamped Lot A November 30, 1999 and Lot B January 31, 2000, except that the garage and house as shown in the submitted plans for Lot B shall be move 2'-0"to the rear of the lot, maintaining the same separation between the two structures; 2. that after receiving a permit from the Parks Department for removal of the protected sized pine tree at the rear of Lot B and prior to receiving a building permit for construction of the house on Lot B, the applicant shall removed the pine tree and shall plant a replacement tree on site at a location approved by the City Arborist; development on both lots shall comply with the city's reforestation ordinance; 3. that the placement of the new trees required under the city's reforestation requirements and the replacement for the protected pine tree shall be based on creating the same canopy effect at maturity of the trees as is now created by the pine tree for the adjacent properties, the location selected for the replanted trees shall be approved by the City Arborist to determine that the canopy effect created will be similar; 4. that the existing house and detached garage shall be demolished prior to recording the lot line adjustment; 5. that the lot line adjustment shall be recorded prior to issuing a building permit and copy of the recorded document shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the building permit and all other requirements of the Department of Public Works memo dated March 28, 2000; 6. that a property survey setting all corners of each lot will be required when a building permit is applied for to determine the property line locations; 7. that during demolition, site preparation and construction of both new houses, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance by implementing appropriate"best management practices: to ensure the site is well protected and managed to prevent sediment and erosion of storm water runoff. If construction activities take place during the rainy season (October 15 to April 15) the applicant shall submit a winterization plan for review and approval by the Planning Department to permit construction during the rainy season, failure to comply will result in a stop work order on the site until the violation is corrected; and 8. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Code regulations, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 05/17/2000 R1 Page:20@03 of 083@8 11111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII R1 Page:p 0004 11:50A 08308 P.C. 4/10/00 Item No. 0.- MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING DATE: MARCH 28, 2000 RE: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AT 2100 POPPY DRIVE, LOT 8, 9, PORTION OF LOT 10, BLK 3,BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION, PM 00-02 Planning Commission Action: Staff requests that the Commission determine whether to approve the lot-line adjustment. Should the Commission decide to approve this application the attached conditions need to be attached: 1. The existing house shall be demolished prior to recording to meet zoning requirements. Also, staff wishes to advise the applicant that: 1. The lot-line adjustment shall be recorded prior to issuing a building permit and a copy of the record shall be sent to the City. 2. A property survey setting all corners will be required when a building permit is applied for either lot to determine the property line locations. 3. The development of Lot A & Lot B will be under design review by the Planning Commission including the effects of site development,proposed paving, irrigation and storm drainage. Background: This application is to subdivide existing Lot 8, Lot 9, and a portion of Lot 10 into two new lots (Lot A & Lot B). Lots 8, 9 and a portion of Lot 10 were created in 1943 prior to any City Ordinances requiring approval and before the Map Act covered less than a five (5) lot subdivision. The existing site consists of two non-conforming lots and a portion of a lot that is also non- conforming. All these lots will be developeable without the lot-line adjustment. A parcel map is not required to split this land from three (3)parcels into two (2). Page -1- The current Subdivision Map Act Section 66412 Map Act Exclusions (d) states: "A lot line adjustment between two or more existing adjacent parcels, where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, and where a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created, provided the lot line adjustment is approved by the local agency, or advisory agency. A local agency or advisory agency shall limit its review and approval to a determination of whether or not the parcels resulting from the lot line adjustment will conform to local zoning and building ordinances. An advisory agency or local agency shall not impose conditions or exactions on its approval of a lot line adjustment except to conform to local zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property fees prior to the approval of the lot-line adjustment, or to facilitate the relocation of existing utilities, infrastructure, or easements. No tentative map,parcel map, final map shall be required as a condition to the approval of a lot line adjustment. The lot line adjustment shall be reflected in a deed, which shall be recorded. No record of survey shall be required for a lot line adjustment unless required by Section 8762 of the Business and professions Code." The proposed Lot A will have 73.96' frontage with an area of 6,875 square feet. The proposed Lot B will have 61.04' frontage and an area of 6,164 square feet. These parcels meet all zoning requirements. The Planning Department has reviewed this map and their comments are attached. There are no public utilities nor public easements that will be affected and this application can be approved by the Commission. The Commission action does not need to be forwarded to Council except on appeal. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 20005 0@583@8 Donald T. Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Plat, Legal Description, Block Map, Letter from Planning Department, Topographic Survey SAA Public Works Directory\Planning Dept.Correspond\00-02,MMO.wpd Page -2- IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIII IIII IIII 2000fi 0058308 \ p Ot p 11712 L °"°��" S ss C'OoI�n \ 29" /rr p ORp 'f rr. y, X� oo" LOT A / D 5 rj+ 6 FA � r• r / C_.) Fss+ LOT B ch ti� Db 1 o'` op y ti9/ /• O e` "yam 1 G O� �JVJ�kPOCi S� 10P5�y/GLANG Q , / L E0 D UL UMAY ` A L 3272 2y/ / Exp. OF CAVE°Q LEGEND �iyry y// QO OO I 2 72 FOUND 2" IP TH WICAP AND CROSS IN HAND HOLE (SET PER 9 MAPS 49-50) EXHIBIT B B & H SURVEYING, INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING 901 WALTERMIRE ST., BELMONT CA. 94002 (650) 637-1590 TITLE: LOTS 8, 9 do A PORTION OF 10, BLOCK 3, BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION OF SAN MATEO (9 M 49) CITY: BURLINGAME COUNTY: SAN MATEO CALIFORNIA SURV BT SCALE, 1' = 30' JOB NO. 4051-98 PLAT. wH DATE: DEC., 1999 FOR, ELLIOTT INVESTMENT GROUP 4055-LLA.DWG B & H SURVEYING, INC . formerly R C HUT.1()\ K ASSOCIA ITS 901 1 RE S'I • IWI TONT. C:V.11 94002 • (650) 637-1590 • FAX (650)637-1059 EXHIBIT A Lot A The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Mateo, City of Burlingame, described as follows: A portion of that parcel of land described in the deed to Alfred Fournier and Bertha Fournier recorded July 14, 1983 in Document No. 83-072323 also being Lot 8 and a portion of Lot 9 in Block 3, as shown on that certain map entitled "MAP OF THE BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION, 'SAN MATEO CO., CAL.", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County on September 27, 1915 in Book 9 of Maps, at pages 49 and 50, more particularly described as follows- Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Lot 8; thence from said point of beginning, along the northeastern line thereof South 55°04'00" East, 110.00 feet to the most eastern corner thereof; thence along the southeastern line thereof and also the southeastern line of said Lot 9 southwesterly along a non-tangent curve having a radius of 451 .00 feet, concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said corner bears South 55004'00" East, through a central angle of 9023'46", an arc length of 73.96 feet; thence leaving said line of Lot 9 North 43007'47" West, 110. 14 feet to a point on the northwestern line of said Lot 9; thence along the northwestern line thereof and also the northwestern line of said Lot 8 northeasterly along a non-tangent curve having a radius of 341 .00 feet, concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said point bears South 46029'28" East, through a central angle of 8034'32", an arc length of 51 .04 feet to the point of beginning. And containing 6875 square feet, more or less. 11111 IN 1111 2/0a007 of it � LAND 3 2 1 6/30/00 OF N:UIh\4051-98\surveM051-98LOTA.doc B&H 12/16/99 B & H SURVEYING, INC. formerly R C HUTFON&ASSOCIATES 901 %V:JAIRMIRP.ST• BELNIOVi.CALIF.94002•(650)637-1590.FA-\(650)637-1059 EXHIBIT A Lot B The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Mateo, City of Burlingame, described as follows: A portion of that parcel of land described in the deed to Alfred Fournier and Bertha Fournier recorded July 14, 1983 in Document No. 83-072323 also being portions of Lots 9 and 10 in Block 3, as shown on that certain map entitled "MAP OF THE BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION, SAN MATEO CO., CAL.", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County on September 27, 1915 in Book 9 of Maps, at pages 49 and 50, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of Lot 8 as shown on said map; thence along the southeastern line thereof and also the southeastern line of said Lot 9 southwesterl along a non-tangent curve having a radius of 451.00 feet, concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said corner bears South 55004'00" East, through a central angle of 9023'46", an arc length of 73.96 feet to the point of beginning; thence from said point of beginning along the southeastern line of said Lots 9 and 10 southwesterly along a non-tangent curve having a radius of 451.00 feet, concave to th northwest, a radial line of said curve through said point bears South 45040'14" East, through a central angle of 7045'18", an arc length of 61.04 feet to the most southerly corner of said Fournier parcel; thence along the southwestern line thereof North 37054'56" West, 110.00 feet to the most westerly corner thereof; thence along the northwestern line thereof being the northwestern line of said Lots 9 and 10, northeasterly along a non-tangent curve having a radius of 341.00 feet, concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said corner bears South 37054'56" East, through a central angle of 803432", an arc-length of 51.04 feet; thence leaving said lir of Lot 9 South 43007'47" East, 110.14 feet to the point of beginning. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII R1 Pagei 20008 0058308 f 11 4 N:\Bh\4051-98\survry\4051-98L)TB.doe B&H Page 1 12/16/99 0 —� S3272 XP 6/30/00 . � Q OF I' And containing 6164 square feet, more or less. Lj IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 05/1712000 o0 ©8308 I 11 4 N:\Bh\4051-98ksurvey\4051-98L.OTB.doc B&H Page 2 12/16/99 i i I h M t• s^'ti S�„oq��,1�\���.,s�65'•.SoA Jrhoa°\'R° rJ�oby�`h�' fs\vohq1L'�l� JS♦snoti�,\'0• !S\hoqa�y�ti•q Jf\5ao1hO'�t•0 fs�♦ oo�° \'•e Js\\\5n1oh\�'5 Ss�\S�o�0�°1 \♦5�p�S \hs�po\J a�ti Iqh��b'IA�l�,yhh,I \�q�qI�e1.I �♦qqc / SaO4�"A,I \hTa 1 O�1 I' I �S\C AVENUE E BERNAL � 'f so W sso' ♦A1 OA 1lS�3 59 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9l0 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 W 45 hL'-'j Sa 2 56 s�• b 33 32 3 1 30 \ 9 2'8 I �SI2O36 35 34 T 2 24 25 26 040 39 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 oso' 1 to1 so so• 96s !O' so •,S �SaAS1O 1 5i- VANCOUVER 2100 VPNCoUVr—�- AVENUE SO' roA JO' Jo' ff• ,o' Jo' \ '0 t aQ9 10 �' II A� 0 ' O/ p 1� JO' I n �o h 7 oo5 16 20 21 22 23 1 24 25 2 15 4 1329 S _ 0 9 Lu Lu 3 a . r 1 1 g 30 ie/.eE?�it',� nyr, 3 �i�o n 14 t�/t� �► �6f ,/la.sss ' h 14 ry h _ `14 43 42� 41 1 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 1 33 n '$ 31 a �SY ^,+ ' '2� �- � 6 L 5 r ry , 4 )b ss.�i �ze9' it• ` �,• I s sv. !o' so' so• so• o' st• /o♦o'er' 9� /62 rte ° L/ DE S 0 T 0 COLUMBUS w� ' ` r'� ..-_1 12;2 55' e ro so t so• so' s so �o.,,. 'n q. y �. '' to 6 a Ayl 41, so so so' so' 1 q� hq� \Gg \\1 \� ,� ♦ \ \h 1..0,” 5� h 7 0 ♦F \ 9 ti 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 h 19 pl�'� �(/ ,elr o.t '�c m" J2, / oti ' r�i n a /e2.39' io,.,,' 7$'t 4 °r m '2 o ?0 "1 /86.S9' B 1 q � � L(/ - - - ' s h b 5 a bry /•o. //e.:3 14p0� 2' N j 1 16 15 1:..7 g' q NIB 2 ;32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24a Q ' QQ9 ` I I h ti0 A 0 h ?' ro 75' 1 L \b \k --irs.o�'ry^ P°7Ti�18 q ' r ` �I 5A6 5 \540 \5 \5� \� \h \� \5 1� M(Qti 23 ti "y Q6 6 a O nr� n. / �• .fb• so• So' SO' SO' So' so, \ e 7 /Oe.96' l y Q T h °j 3O 17 0 27 �, AV E N U E a .. +�o• ti H 0 0 V E R (CAP-25) AVE N U E „o. a �a Q 6 So. /.o• /.o. n 31,?)N� t-�o 6 0 ` S S1 IAS ,29 CITY BOUNDARY RttZr16 o 'o iio• * J r 143 1�) I� \ 28 o� 11 15725 h 32�✓ H ZfQr 5 g 7 8 8 b Q 9 J�• ti�'�'i 2 4 0 //o $X09 4 $ so sn fv so' +� COUNTY OF SAN MATED ` v "� �' '/� �+ /' 20@0-058308 � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII R5/Page00©01of511 0R t .'• City of Burlingame Interdepartmental Correspondence March 16,2000 To: Donald Chang,Senior Engineer,Department of Public Works From: Janice Jagelski,Planner Subject: Planning Comments on Lot Line Adjustment for 2100 Poppy Drive Planning staff is currently preparing a staff report for the March 27,2000 Planning Commission hearing for the project at 2100 Poppy Drive. The issues addressed in the Planning Department staff report include: 1)the conditional use permit for the demolition of the existing house which would then unmerge the three(or two and a half)lots at 2100 Poppy Drive;2)design review for the two new two-story houses;3)special permits for height for both houses,and 4)a variance for the second storyfront setback of the new house proposed on Lot B. The design of the new houses has been reviewed by a Design Review Consultant who has recommended approval of the project. Planning Commission's action and approval of these applications is scheduled for the public hearing on March 27,2000,pending the acceptance of the application materials by the Department of Public Works and Planning Department. Planning staff has reviewed the boundary and topographic survey which identifies the footprint of the existing house,old parcel lines,proposed new parcel lines,and the footprints and setbacks of the proposed new houses. Planning staff has determined that this tentative map,as proposed,is acceptable,however,it should be noted that the new house on Lot B(interior lot)includes an application for a variance because the second story(not outlined on the map)does not meet the minimum setback of 20'-0" from the front property line. This setback variance is specific for the design of the new house proposed on this site;but other single family homes could be designed to meet the R-1 zoning standards. Planning staff has determined that the proposed boundary and topographic survey conforms with the R-1 zoning standards. It would have been helpful for the applicant to identify the size(square footage)of the existing and proposed lots included in the lot line adjustment. The draft staff report for this project will be available on Monday,March 20,2000 with the final report ready for distribution on March 22,2000. Please call me at 558-7251 if you have questions regarding this application or require any additional information for the processing of a staff report for the Lot Line Adjustment. 111111 IIII 1111111 IIII VIII IIII 1111111 III 111111 II IIII 20000 '058308