Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 020-1994 RESOLUTION NO. 20-94 ,l .PI:2ASE RETURN I MCORDED COPY TO: RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT PLANNING DBP CrrY OP BURUNCIAME 501 PREMROSE RO RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: BURLDKIAME,CA 94010 WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a Special Permit to increase the area of an existing non-con£ormina accessory structure at 816 Paloma Avenue. APN 029-015-250; _(Robert Isola. 816 Paloma Avenue property owner and applicant)_; and WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 11, 1994 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Class 3(a), Single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units.) is hereby approved. 2. Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, RUTH E. JACOBS , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of April , 1994 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DEAL, ELLIS, GALLIGAN, JACOBS, KELLY AND MINK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: GRAHAM SECRETARY I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my office. Date: 4.19 94 wl�a- k '(Yuen rg Margaret�Monroe, City Planner RESOLUTION NO. 20-94 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a Special Permit to increase the area of an existing non-conforming accessory structure at 816 Paloma Avenue, APN 029-015-250; (Robert Isola. 816 Paloma Avenue. property owner and applicant) ; and WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 11, 1994 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Class 3 (a) , Single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. ) is hereby approved. 2 . Said special permit is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Special Permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3 . It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, RUTH E. JACOBS , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of April 1994 by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DEAL, ELLIS, GALLIGAN, JACOBS, KELLY AND MINK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: GRAHAM a SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval categorical exemption special permit 816 PALOMA AVENUE effective APRIL 11, 1994 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plan submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March 1, 1994 General Site Plan and the existing building, as a nonconforming structure, shall retain its present envelope and eaves; 2 . that all inoperable vehicles shall be removed from the driveway by May 1, 1994 and the driveway shall not be used for auto repair in the future; 3 . that all conditions of the City Engineer' s March 7, 1994 memo, the Fire Marshal ' s March 7, 1994 memo and the Chief Building inspector' s March 9, 1994 memo shall be met; 4 . that the uses in the structure shall be parking in the garage with a minimum 9 foot clear width, storage in the first floor room behind the garage, sleeping in the second floor room behind the garage, and storage in the shed and that at no time shall a kitchen be added to any portion of the existing structure or shed addition so that it can be used as a dwelling unit; 5. that the property owner shall request an inspection of the structures by the Building Department, such inspection shall be based on standards in the Housing Code, and the property owner shall be required to make any corrections necessary to insure that the existing structure and shed addition meet all the requirements of the Housing Code, building permits shall be obtained for all required work and proper inspections called for and completed; 6. that the Building Department shall inspect the bathroom and determine if the toilet and shower were installed prior to 1950; if they were installed prior to 1950 the bathroom shall be retained and improved to meet the safety and sanitary requirements of the Housing Code for the benefit of the sleeping room otherwise the bathroom shall be removed as a part of making the structure comply with the safe and sanitary requirements of the Housing codes; and 7 . that so long as the nonconforming garage with the two story addition at the rear with the new shed addition continues to exist on this site, the property owner shall be prohibited from adding any more detached or attached accessory structures anywhere on the lot.