HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 006-1995 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: I
I OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
PLANNING DEPARTMENT I SAN MATE 0 COUNTY
CITY OF BURLINGAME I ASSESSOR-COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CA 94010 WARREN S L O C U M
Recorded at Request of
BURLINGAME CITY
95-025439 03/14/95 03:02
Recording
Fee: RSOARES
Resolution No. 6-95
100 Bloomfield Road, APN No. 029-273-180
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in
my office.
Date: 3.7.95
Met Monroe, City Planner
RESOLUTION NO, 6-95
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
SPECIAL PERMIT,LOT COVERAGE AND PARKING VARIANCES
RESOLVED,by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for lot
coverage variance for 42%where 40%is the maximum allowed by code and a narking variance for
number of covered stalls,substandard stall width,substandard stall length and to allow parking between
the structure and front property line and a dial permit to expand the primary residential unit on a
R-1 property with two units at 100 Bloomfield Road zoned R-1.APN: 029-273-180;property owner:
Rudy and Katharina Froehlich, 100 Bloomfield Road ;and
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
February 27. 1995 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW,THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed,and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that
the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment,and categorical exemption
per Section: 15301-Class 1(e)Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result
in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition or 2500 SF,
whichever is less is hereby approved.
2. Said special permit, lot coverage and parking variances are approved subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit"A"attached hereto. Findings for such variances and Special Permit are
as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
F4
CH AN
I, Mike Ellis , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do ereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of February, 1995 ,by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSMEAL, ELLIS, JACOBS, KEY, MINK AND GALLIGAN
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KELLY
SECRETARY
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval categorical exemption, special permit, lot coverage and parking variance
100 BLOOMFIELD ROAD
effective MARCH 6, 1995
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped February 6, 1995, sheets A0, Al and A-2 except that the curb cut and
driveway from Bayswater to the face of the structure shall be removed;
2. that the requirements of the City Engineer's memo dated January 18, 1995 shall be met
and that the former driveway area shall be replaced with soft landscaping such as grass;
3. that the primary unit shall be 100 Bloomfield; any additional expansion of 100 Bloomfield
shall require a special permit from the Planning Commission and there shall be no
expansion of the secondary structure (102 Bloomfield); and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire
Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame.