Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 011-1975r- RESOLUTION 11- 75 SUSTAINING DENIAL OF VARIANCE -- EDWARD S. GOETZ RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame that: Whereas, pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance Code of the City of Burlingame, a permit for a variance was applied for by Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. Goetz, to allow an accessory building to be erected closer than four (4) feet to a main structure; and Whereas, after due notice and hearing said variance was denied by the Planning Commission on December 30, 1974, as more fully set forth in the minutes of the meeting of that date; and Whereas, pursuant to the provisions of said Code the decision denying the variance was appealed by the applicants to the City Council and, upon due notice, a hearing was held thereon on January 20, 1975; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED and FOUND that: i 1. The variance application of Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. Goetz to allow an accessory building to be erected closer than four (4) feet to the main building on that property located at 2200 Poppy Drive, Burlingame, was denied by the Planning Commission on December 30, 1974. 2. The denial of said variance by the Planning Commission was appealed to the City Council as allowed by said Code and all proper i notices and procedures were duly given and followed. -1- 3. Based on the evidence presented to the City Council on January 20, 1975, the following findings are made: (a) Said variance is requested from the requirements of Section 25.28.050 of the Burlingame Municipal Code that main structures and accessory structures must be at least four feet apart. (b) Said variance is for a carport constructed prior to the application for said variance and attached to both the main structure on the property, a residence, and the garage. (c) No evidence was presented at the hearing of January 20, 1975, concerning comparison of the property at 2200 Poppy Drive with surrounding properties. 4. On the basis of the evidence presented to this Council at the hearing of January 20, 1975, it is concluded that there are no special circumstances applicable to the property at 2200 Poppy Drive which, under the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance, would deprive said property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification, and that said appeal should be denied and the Planning Commission's decision should be affirmed. I Maycuf • VLOOXJ j I, HERBERT K. WHITE, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was intro- duced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the3rd day of February, 1975, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Amstrup—Harrison—Mangini NOES: COUNCILMEN: Crosby —Cusick ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: None 2- City Clerk