HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 1978.12.06 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Study Meeting
December 61 1978
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS AMSTRUP, BARTON, CROSBY, MANGINI, MARTIN
Staff: Schwalm, Coleman,- Kirkup, Yost, Hoffman, Wagner,
Fricke
Mayor Crosby convened the Study Meeting of the Burlingame City
Council at 8:45 p.m. on December 6, 1978, in the Council Chambers
of the Burlingame City Hall.
1. COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF THE PROCEDURE OF HEARING
ON REPORT OF BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
Mayor Crosby noted the large number of people present due to an
erroneous notice delivered to homes announcing there would be a public
hearing on a proposed tree/view ordinance. He explained that the
notice had not originated from the City and the subject which appeared
on this meeting's agenda would be a discussion of procedure for con-
sideration of the report, and that there would be no public hearing
on the matter at this meeting. After Council discussion a public
hearing was scheduled for Wednesday, January 10, 1979, for public
input and Council study. Thereafter, should Council direct staff to
prepare a proposed ordinance, another public hearing would normally
be conducted at the meeting following introduction of the ordinance.
2. JOHN BROWNING'S PROPOSAL FOR A GOLF FACILITY
Mr. David Carr addressed Council to introduce Mr. Browning's proposal
for a golf driving range and sport center to be constructed in lieu
of a nine hole golf course and driving range on the dump site property
at the waterfront. He stated that Mr. Browning, a financial consultant
and several construction consultants were present at the meeting to
discuss the written proposal submitted by Mr. Browning.
Mr. Browning with the aid of drawings and aerial photographs explained
his proposal for development of approximately 43 acres of City property
in three phases. The first phase, involving 16 acres, would consist
of a lighted and sheltered driving range, 2 putting greens, a modern
pro shop, a coffee shop and an enlarged parking area which would serve
(� the present ball field as well. Phases 2 and 3 would be completed in
the future to meet the sports needs of the community as they may develop.
He envisioned a 50 meter swimming pool which he said was greatly needed
in the area because the closest competitive size pool is-located in
Santa Clara. He felt the future, when Phase 3 'will be-planned, may
1
indicate a community need for a soccer field, miniature golf, tennis
courts, or perhaps a marina. He also urged the need for a building
( to serve as a convention center or a small theater.
"• Council questioned abandonment of the concept of a nine hole golf
course, and pointed out that Robert Graves had prepared plans and
William H. Sherman had prepared a feasibility report for such a
course at Council's request. Mr. Browning responded that he con-
sidered the dump fill subject to settlement which would make the
use impractical; that the land area limitations would make too
small a course with a dangerous condition caused by hit balls without
a very high fence; and that the sports needs of the community would
be better served by facilities in addition to golf.
Mr. Ralph F. Clark addressed Council on the financial aspects of
Mr. Browning's proposal. He stated that although financing of this
type of project without municipal liability is extremely difficult,
his associates are presently prepared to finance Phase 1 in its
entirety. A commitment on Phases 2 and 3 was not yet available, but
they would work diligently with the City to bring about what is best
for its recreational purposes. Mr. Clark answered Council questions
regarding the proposed rental and percentage of gross income set
forth in Mr. Browning's proposal. In response to Council request
Mr. Clark said he would prepare more detailed financial information.
He added that he and his associates had talked with people on hotel
row and with the Chamber of Commerce and everyone seemed to approve
the plan. He repeated Mr. Browning's desire to work with the
Recreation Department toward a complete sports recreation program
for the populous.
Council discussed the concept of a nine hole golf course which had
been under consideration since the early 19601s. They questioned
the contentions of unsuitability of the site for that purpose in
the light of Mr. Graves' two architectural designs and Mr. Sherman's
feasibility report. Council requested staff to contact Mr. Graves
for his opinion and to request Mr. Sherman to up-date his study.
Mr. Clark stated that he and his associates had conferred briefly
and would be willing to pay consulting fees for Mr. Graves and Mr.
Sherman if the matter is seriously being considered.
Mayor Crosby suggested that Mr. Sherman's study be updated and that
staff determine with him and Mr. Graves when both could be present
at a study meeting when Mr. Browning's proposal would be presented
in more detail and staff's concerns would be expressed. Mr. Kirkup
said he would give Council information as to a possible time when
Mr. Sherman and Mr. Graves could be present at its meeting of
December 18th.
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (Councilman Martin not participating)
�.. Mr. Kirkup stated that after Council decision that no residential
development would be permitted in the Bayfront area the Planning
Commission was asked to monitor development and traffic levels, and
Council asked the Commission and staff to consider a development
charge. Staff presented its Progress Report as of November 30th,
on Development Policy for the Anza Area. Based upon the report
2
and staff's presentation Mr. Kirkup asked direction and an indication
of whether staff is proceeding in the manner Council wished.
Mr. Yost reviewed the memorandum. He pointed out that an essential
element in considering traffic improvements is the determination of
land use because of varying traffic generated by specific uses.
Within C-4, choices of use are broad, and perhaps Council would
like to consider the designation of preferred uses for specific
sites. He referred to the five goals listed on pages 2 and 3 of
the memorandum:
1. That development be consistant with transportation system
capacity;
2. That maximum access of the public to water areas be maintained;
3. That development should yield the highest revenue to cost ratio;
4. That the best quality development be obtained; and
5. That a visually attractive development result.
Staff recommendations to -accomplish the goals are (1) a designation
of uses to be permited; (2) quantity of land to be reserved for each
use; (3) determination of preferred locations for each use; and
(4) further input from property owners regarding land advailability
and commitments. It was also recommended that Drachman Associates
be employed for further study of traffic impacts as they may be
needed in the future in connection with the planning of necessary
traffic improvements. \
Council expressed approval of the progress report; especially
the concept of emphasis of development upon hotel, restaurant
and recreational uses. Referring to Exhibit A of the report, Mr.
Yost was questioned as to methods for monitoring land use and de-
velopment for these purposes and so that transportation capacities
are not exceeded. Mr. Yost responded that a quota system may be
advisable. With respect to hotel site designations, he pointed
out that the City had never contacted major hotel chains for
indication of which sites would be preferable for that use by
those in the industry. Councilman Amstrup proposed that he talk
with Mr. Steen of the Convention and Visitors Bureau who might be
able to pursue inquiry through the Bureau. Mr. Coleman stated
that during the convention center studies contact was established
with accounting firms from whom he can request information on the
subject.
Councilman Amstrup and Councilwoman Barton urged the need for
criteria and guidelines which should be established as speedily
t as possible before applications for permits are received. High
priority should be established for hotels and restaurants and uses
that would insure public access to the waterfront.
3
Mr. David Keyston stated that he had received a copy of the
progress report, but had not been consulted in the development .
of the proposed plan. He commented that the plan shown on Exhibit
A was not workable because too much land was earmarked for office
use. He said he had developed a plan which he felt would work
without any traffic improvements. His plan contemplates 30 years
for hotel absorption instead of 20 years and includes 13 acres of
office/warehouse. It also includes an interim park and fly and
continuation of the drive-in theater with the expectation that the
traffic problem will be relieved by the time its lease is up; but,
should traffic permit earlier, the drive-in could be put to office/
warehouse sooner. He commented that there are solutions to pre-
vent the type of problem which might develop when an owner is not
permitted to develop his land. He pointed out that the Blayney
report cited office/warehouse as a major source of sales tax income.
He referred to Exhibit B of the progress report relating to the
development charge discussion requested by Council, and indicated
the Anza Shareholders Liquidating Trust would not object to the
concept as long as the 100% development charge is not considered.
He suggested that rather than base the concept entirely on parking
or traffic, that parking, traffic and peak traffic generations
should be considered.
Mayor Crosby inquired about the status of negotiations with the
R. State relating to the freeway on-ramp. Mr. Kirkup responded that
he had received a letter stating that State funds have been com-
mitted for the next five years and that the City will have to pay
for the entire improvement. Though the State indicates nothing
will be inserted into the program, he is working with them, but
he added that he felt Council might contact our legislators. Also,
it may be necessary to review proposed improvements in the water-
front to reduce the cost, and come back to Council with a more
definitive report.
Mr. Kirkup explained that the 25% development charge for the Bay-
front Area was mentioned in his memorandum to the Planning Com-
mission; the 40% amount is what was used in the parking district,
and 100% is the extreme charge. He said he believes there will be
difficulty if existing property is included unless after an election.
He believes the Planning Commission favors the 40% charge. Mayor
Crosby stated that he believed all improvements in the waterfront
should be included, as well as improvements along Peninsula Avenue.
Council approved staff's procedures as presented to Council and
requested further study moving toward a resolution of the problems
along the lines reported in the progress memorandum, including
consultation with Mr. Drachman, and a further report to Council
in January.
4
OTHER
1. .Request to maintain flower stand - Suzanne Croghan
Mr. Schwalm introduced Ms. Croghan who submitted a request for
a permit to sell flowers from a stand to be located on the side-
walk between two potted trees front of the Arcade. After Council
discussion of the impact upon traffic and other merchants, it was
decided not to grant an exception to the City's ordinance pro-
hibiting this type of sidewalk vending.
2. Study session meeting room
Councilman Amstrup requested that a study be made toward arrange-
ing a conference room larger than Conference Room B for study
meetings so that it would not be necessary to move those meetings
to the Council Chambers when a large audience is present. He
suggested the Finance Department might be consolidated to make
the present ,dater Office available as a meeting room.
3. Rat bait program
Mr. Schwalm requested permission to use $400 to $500 for the
purchase of additional rat-bait to continue the rat extermination
program until the end of the fiscal year. There was no Council
objection.
4: United States Sister City Association
Mr. Schwalm requested authorization to pay the annual membership
dues for the ensuing year. There was no Council objection.
5. Suggested user charges
Mr. Schwalm distributed a list of proposed user charges for
consideration by Council.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:45 a.m.
Notes:
A. Keating
5