Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 071-1981RESOLUTION NO.-7i- 81 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AND ORDERING REORGANIZATION TO DETACH FROM THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND ANNEX TO THE CITY OF BURLINGAME A PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (.35+ ACRES) - INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL, PENINSULA AVENUE AND BARROILHET RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame as follows: WHEREAS, there has heretofore been filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Mateo a petition for a municipal reorganization to detach from the City of San Mateo and annex to the City of Burlingame that certain territory more fully described hereinafter at the intersection of El Camino Real, Peninsula Avenue and Barroilhet; and WHEREAS, said proposal was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission,and this Council pursuant to the requirements of law has adopted a resolution initiating pro- ceedings for said reorganization; and WHEREAS, said proposal was approved without notice and hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, DETERMINED and FOUND as follows: 1. Preliminary proceedings were commenced by petition under the Municipal Organization Act, Sections 35,000, et sec., of the Government Code, the chief petitioners being the City of San Mateo and the City of Burlingame. 2. The affected cities are San Mateo'and Burlingame. 3. The change of organization proposed is the detachment of the subject area from the City of San Mateo and its annexation to the City of Burlingame. 10/1/81 11 1 4. The reason for the reorganization as described in the proposal is to simplify police and maintenance assignments between the Cities of San Mateo and Burlingame. S. There were no terms or conditions of the proposed reorganization contained in LAFCo's Resolution No. 638 making determinations upon the proposal except to assign it the short form designation: "Reorganization of a portion of the public right-of-way to detach from San Mateo and annex to Burlingame (.35+ acres) pursuant to Government Code Section 35200." 6. The description of the boundaries of the area involved in such change of organization is more particularly set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. 7. There were no written protests filed regarding said reorganization, all of the real property involved being rights -of -way at the intersection of E1 Camino Real, Peninsula Avenue and Barroilhet Avenue. 8. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 35,308 of the Government Code, this Council does hereby order said reorganization. 9. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution, along with the necessary fees, to the Executive Officer of the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission, to the County Assessor, and to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo. l MaA j70r 2 I, EVELYN H. HILL, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council held on the 5th day of October, 1981, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Amstrup-Barton-Crosby-Mangini-flartin NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None , City Clerk F P.InPOSED REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OR BURLINGA? 1. Beginning at an angle point in the City of Burlingame's boundary that is the intersection of the centerline of Peninsula Avenue with the korthwesterl-.i prolongation of the Northeasterly curb line of El Camino Real, as said curb line existed on July 19, 1915; said curb line being parallel with and 14 feet distant Southwesterly from the Northeasterly line_ of El Camino Real; thence, 2. Along said boundary of the City of Burlingame, Southeasterly along said Dro- longation to its intersection with the Southeasterly line of Peninsula Avenue prolonged Southwesterly; thence, 3. Continuing along said boundary, Southwesterly at right angles to E1 Canino Real to the centerline of E1 Canino Real (1915); thence, 4. Continuing along said boundary, Southeasterly along said centerline to the intersection of the centerline of Barroilhet Avenue and a point in Corporate limits of San Mateo; thence, 5. Northeasterly along said San Mateo corporate limits and said centerline of Barroilhet Avenue prolonged to its intersection with the Southwesterly line of Lot 9, Block 1 of the "Map of Central Addition to San Mateo" recorded July 24, 1906 in Volume 4 of Maps, Page 27, San .Mateo County Records; thence, 6. Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line -of Lot 9 to the most Southeasterly point of that certain property granted by deed to the City of San Mateo by the San !Mateo Grarmar School District and recorded September 6, 1935 in Book. 655, Page 411 of Official Records of San Mateo County; thence, 7. Northwesterly along a tangent curve as described in said deed to a point of tangency in said Southwesterly line of. Lot 9; thence, - B. Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line and its prolongation to the inter- section with the centerline of Peninsula Avenue being the common boundary between the City of San Mateo and the City of Burliraane; thence, 9. Along said common boundary, Southwesterly along said centerline to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 2 PO 0 PARCEL TO BE ANNEXED TO 5URl1,VGA1WE AV 184 ot CITY OF BUR-LIMGAM.F CITY 0,;r -Z4 /V MA TcO ZO 400 ON R�GRG AN I 7�T ION T 0 Tr i E 0 12 T Y OFF BURL IGADAE 'I r.