HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 074-2006RESOLUTION NO. 74-2006
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND
THE CITY OF SAN MATEO FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE
PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the Peninsula Avenue interchange is scheduled for reconstruction as part of
improvementS to U.S. 101; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Mateo is beginning a traffic study of the Peninsula
Avenue/Poplar Avenue interchange system; and
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame should participate in that study in order to ensure
that Burlingame's needs are met and to assist San Mateo in bearing the costs of a full study,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Agreement between the
City of San Mateo and the City of Burlingame as contained in Exhibit A hereto.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of
September- 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, KEIGHRAN, NAGEL, 0
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COGEN
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE `
CITY CLERK
Exhibit "A"
Scope of Work (5/5/06)
Travel Demand Modeling/Forecasting Support for the Peninsula
Avenue/US 101 Interchange Improvement Study
Task 1: Develop Future Year Transportation Networks
Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand model networks and C/CAG traffic congestion
model the City of Burlingame to create future year transportation networks for the Peninsula Avenue
Interchange Improvement Study. The networks need to reflect the preliminary alternatives that have been
defined by city staff. The transportation networks and basic model data being used for this work consists
of a San Mateo citywide travel demand model system that was validated against year 2000 ground counts
and utilizes ABAG Projections 2000. The future networks will reflect up to five individual alternatives
defined by City of San Mateo staff, plus a "No Build" Alternative.
The future alternatives will all include the RTP Track 1 project list for the entire nine -county Bay
Area. For the future year, both financially constrained and fiscally projected projects will be included
in the background transportation networks.
The defined alternatives for study are as follows:
1
Existing
Existing
2
Closure of both ramps
No access to/from SB 101 (existing)
3
Closure of both ramps
New SB off- and on-ramp (full i/c)
4
Closure of off -ramp
No access to/from SB 101 (existing)
5
Closure of off -ramp
New SB off -ramp
6
Closure of off -ramp
New SB off- and on-ramp (full i/c)
7*
Safety Improvements
Existing
* Review of safety improvements at Amphlett/Poplar completed under separate contract.
All scenarios will be modeled for year 2020, using the land use data assumpations associated with the
2020 Corridor Plan with Bay Meadows Phase II project. The forecast for Scenario 1 has already been
developed.
Task 2: Develop Year 2020/2030 Travel Demand Forecasts
Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand forecast model system to create travel forecast
scenarios for the transportation alternatives shown in Task 1. This model will be used as the basis for
developing travel forecasts and future intersection link volumes for five future alternatives, plus a No
Build option (see Task 1). For each scenario, volumes for the AM and PM peak 3 -hour periods will be
produced.
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 1
Task 3: Evaluate Travel Demand for Alternatives
Hexagon will provide a series of model outputs for the six individual alternatives. Hexagon will analyze
the AM and PM peak (3 -hour) period results of these model runs and provide the following information:
• Volume plots,
• Difference plots, and
• Level of Service (volume -to -capacity) plots.
The change in forecast volumes (for each alternative) wil be analyzed for 17 individual intersections as
follows:
1. Humboldt Street & Third Avenue
2. Humboldt Street & Fourth Avenue
3. Humboldt Street & Peninsula Avenue
4. Humboldt Street & Poplar Avenue
5. Delaware Street & Third Avenue
6. Delaware Street & Fourth Avenue
7. Delaware Street & Peninsula Avenue
8. Delaware Street & Poplar Avenue
9. EI Camino Real & Third Avenue
10. EI Camino Real & Fourth Avenue
11. El Camino Real & Peninsula Avenue/Park Road
12. EI Camino Real & Poplar Avenue
13. El Camino Real & Burlingame Avenue
14. El Camino Real & Broadway Avenue
15. Burlingame Avenue and Dwight Road
16. Broadway Avenue and California Avenue
17. Airport Boulevard and US 101 Interchange ramps
18. Bloomfield/Bayswater*
* This intersection may require additional modeling if not currently in model.
Task 4: Perform Select Link Analysis for Alternatives
Hexagon will provide select link analysis for the six individual alternatives shown in Task 1. Hexagon
will analyze up to two select link analyses for both the AM and PM peak (3 -hour) periods, for a total of
24 possible select link runs.
Task 5: Develop Travel Demand for 2020 Alternative without 251h AV
Extension
Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand forecast model system to create travel forecast
for the scenario that includes extension of 28"' Avenue and 31st Avenue and does not include the
extension of 25d' Avenue. This model will be used as the basis for developing travel forecasts and future
link volumes. For this scenario, volumes for the AM and PM peak 3 -hour periods will be produced.
Products will include volume plots, difference plots (comparing to the alternative that includes the
extension of 25di Avenue), and level of service (volume -to -capacity) plots.
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 2
Task 6: Document Analysis and Prepare Traffic Demand Forecasting
Model Memorandum
Hexagon will prepare draft technical documentation presenting the results of the travel demand forecasts.
The evaluation data developed in Task 3, and the change in intersection link volumes resulting from each
of the alternatives (compared to the No Build) will be incorporated into the travel demand forecasting
technical memorandum.
Task 7: Attend Meetings
Hexagon will attend up to three meetings with City staff in conjunction with this study.
Any results, analyses, model outputs or services not described in the above tasks are considered extra
services and would be subject to a supplemental add-on to the initial scope of work.
Schedule
The analysis and the draft memorandum of the forecast results will take approximately 6 weeks to
complete. It is anticipated that another two to three weeks will be needed to respond to any remaining
questions and concerns by city staff. The analysis will be completed by June 30, 2006
Cost
The cost of producing and documenting the travel demand model runs and analysis is estimated at
$55,972 ($55,572 in labor costs and $400 in other direct costs). The break down of costs by task is
included in the following table.
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 3