HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 042-2007RESOLUTION NO. - 42-2007
REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE
ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRLAN BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code
(PUC) Section 99200 et sec „ authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning
agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists;
and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No.
875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects,"
which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of "TDA Article
3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of
TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each
county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of
TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for
the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City of Burlingame declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA
Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the
project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the
City of Burlingame to carry out the project; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City of Burlingame attests to the accuracy of and approves the
statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any
accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency,
countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be,
of San Mateo County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3
claim.
M yor
I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of
May , 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
BAYLOCK, COHEN,KEIGHW, NAGEL,O'MAHONY
GD"
`L,IIJ;1_�I
Clerk
ATTACHMENT A
REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE
ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIANBICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING
Findings
Page 1 of 1
1. That the City of Burlingame is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3
funds, nor is the City of Burlingame legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in
"Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the City of Burlingame has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s)
described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all
pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and
clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects
described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a
schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of
funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design
engineering; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic;
and/or for the purposes of restriping Class lI bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of
a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or
pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been
received by the City of Burlingame within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a
detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted
comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act,
Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.).
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the mandatory
minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design
Manual.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation during the
fiscal year of the requested allocation.
11. That the City of Burlingame agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s)
and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
Resolution No.
Attachment B
page 3 of 3
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: FY2007/2008 Applicant City of Burlingame
Contact person Mr. Augustine Chou
Mailing Address: 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010
E -Mail Address: achoWdOulingame org Telephone: 650-558-7230
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Ms Jane Gomery
E -Mail Address: igomerviibburlingame og Telephone: 650-558-7230
Short Title Description of Project: Burlingame TDA Projects FY 2007108
Amount of claim $115,854
Functional Description of Project:
Installation of one Class 2 bike lanes on Howard Avenue installation of one Class 3 SHARROW bike route on California Drive and installation of an
illuminated crosswalk system at the intersection of Broadway and Paloma Avenue
Financial Plan:
List the project elements forwhich TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Project Elements: Design engineering administration construction contingency, and audit
Funding Source All Prior FYs
Application FY Next FY
Following FYs Totals
TDA Article 3
$40,000 $75,854
$115,854
list all other sources:
NO
C.
1. Local General Funds
$20,000 $37,926
$57,926
2.
YES
E.
3.
YES
F.
4.
YES
G.
Totals
YES
$173,780
Project Eligibility:
YES?1NO?
A.
Has the project been approved by the claimants governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated).
YES
B.
Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page.
NO
C.
For'bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet via: b2 //www.dot.ca.gov).
YES
D.
Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "N0," provide an explanation).
YES
E.
Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction).
YES
F.
Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year) 12/2009
YES
G.
Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
1
YES
11
MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5