HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 065-2008RESOLUTION NO. 65-2008
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, DENYING THE
APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S MAY
27, 2008, APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND PARKING
VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW BASEMENT AREA
TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ON
PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE
RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved applications for
Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Special Permit for a basement and Parking
Variance, and adopted a Categorical Exemption, related to a first and second story addition and
new basement area to an existing single family dwelling on property located at 1790 Escalante
Way (APN: 025-352-030), and owned by David Zhang, 1790 Escalante Way, Burlingame,
California; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's May 27, 2008 approval was appealed by Jeffrey
and June Kaufman, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal on July 21,
2008; denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class
1(e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures provided the addition will not
result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the
addition.
Said Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Parking Variance and Special
Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Parking Variance
and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said
meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
0 '0
Mayor
1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO.
City Council Agenda — July 21, 2008
APPEAL —1790 Escalante Way
I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City
resolution was introduced and adopted at
day of July, 2008 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21't
Deal, Keighran, Nagel
Baylock, O'Mahony
None
City Cl k
2of2
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way
Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3,
and date stamped March 28, 2008, sheets A1, A2, A6 and A7, and that any changes to
building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that during the construction phase of the project, there shall be no more than 3
construction vehicles plus a debris box, on the property at any time;
3. that a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the Building Official for review and
approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for project construction;
4. that in the event that damage to the fence on the property at 3130 Atwater Drive occurs
due to construction of the project, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement of
the damaged fence;
5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007
and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo, the Fire
Marshal's September 24, 2007 and October 22, 2007, memos, and the NPDES
Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memo shall be met;
6. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition, the debris box shall be
placed within the driveway of the subject property;
7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
8. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject
to Planning Commission review;
9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way
Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008
11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department; and
that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
2of2
Recording Requested by:
Doris J. Mortensen, City Clerk
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
When Recorded Mail to:
Doris J. Mortensen, City Clerk
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlineame, CA 94010
11:34am 08/05/08 R1 Fee: NO FEE
Count of pages 5
Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
Warren Slocum
Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder
111111111111111111$ 11 1111111 IIII111II11111 IIIIII111111
* 2 0 0 8 0 0 8 9 8 6 8 A R*
THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY
RECENLLi
AUG 15 2008
CITY CF BURLINGAME
TITLE OF DOCUMENT:
RESOLUTION 65-2008 DENYING APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE
KAUFMAN OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND
PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND
NEW BASEMENT AREA TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT
1790 ESCALANTE WAY ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE, IN BURLINGAME
APN: 025-352-030
Owner: DAVID ZIIANG
RESOLUTION NO. 65-2008
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, DENYING THE
APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S MAY
27, 2008, APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND PARKING
VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW BASEMENT AREA
TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ON
PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE
RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT:
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved applications for
Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Special Permit for a basement and Parking
Variance, and adopted a Categorical Exemption, related to a first and second story addition and
new basement area to an existing single family dwelling on property located at 1790 Escalante
Way (APN: 025-352-030), and owned by David Zhang, 1790 Escalante Way, Burlingame,
California; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's May 27, 2008 approval was appealed by Jeffrey
and June Kaufman, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal on July 21,
2008; denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class
1(e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures provided the addition will not
result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the strurturPs hafnra fha
addition.
Said Design Review, Hillside Area Constructio
Permit are approved subject to the conditions
Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Are
and Special Permit are set forth in the staff
meeting.
n Permit, Parking Variance and Special
set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Area
Construction Permit, Parking Variance
report, minutes, and recording of said
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo,
0 '
Mayor
1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO.
City Council Agenda — July 21, 2008
APPEAL — 1790 Escalante Way
I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st
day of July, 2008 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Deal, Keighran, Nagel
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Baylock, O'Mahony
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
J hereby certify this to be a full, true
anr, correct copy of the document it
pu_ports to be, the original of which ie
or, file in my office.
Dated:
r.
City of `Bldrlingame
2of2
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way
Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3,
and date stamped March 28, 2008, sheets Al, A2, A6 and A7, and that any changes to
building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that during the construction phase of the project, there shall be no more than 3
construction vehicles plus a debris box, on the property at any time;
3. that a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the Building Official for review and
approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for project construction;
4. that in the event that damage to the fence on the property at 3130 Atwater Drive occurs
due to construction of the project, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement of
the damaged fence;
5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007
and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo, the Fire
Marshal's September 24, 2007 and October 22, 2007, memos, and the NPDES
Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memo shall be met;
6. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition, the debris box shall be
placed within the driveway of the subject property;
7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
8. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject
to Planning Commission review;
9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way
Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008
11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building
Department; and
that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance
of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
2of2