Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 065-2008RESOLUTION NO. 65-2008 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, DENYING THE APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S MAY 27, 2008, APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW BASEMENT AREA TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved applications for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Special Permit for a basement and Parking Variance, and adopted a Categorical Exemption, related to a first and second story addition and new basement area to an existing single family dwelling on property located at 1790 Escalante Way (APN: 025-352-030), and owned by David Zhang, 1790 Escalante Way, Burlingame, California; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's May 27, 2008 approval was appealed by Jeffrey and June Kaufman, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal on July 21, 2008; denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1(e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Said Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Parking Variance and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Parking Variance and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. 0 '0 Mayor 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. City Council Agenda — July 21, 2008 APPEAL —1790 Escalante Way I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City resolution was introduced and adopted at day of July, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21't Deal, Keighran, Nagel Baylock, O'Mahony None City Cl k 2of2 EXHIBIT A Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3, and date stamped March 28, 2008, sheets A1, A2, A6 and A7, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that during the construction phase of the project, there shall be no more than 3 construction vehicles plus a debris box, on the property at any time; 3. that a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the Building Official for review and approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for project construction; 4. that in the event that damage to the fence on the property at 3130 Atwater Drive occurs due to construction of the project, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement of the damaged fence; 5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007 and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 24, 2007 and October 22, 2007, memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memo shall be met; 6. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition, the debris box shall be placed within the driveway of the subject property; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 2of2 Recording Requested by: Doris J. Mortensen, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 When Recorded Mail to: Doris J. Mortensen, City Clerk City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlineame, CA 94010 11:34am 08/05/08 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 5 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder 111111111111111111$ 11 1111111 IIII111II11111 IIIIII111111 * 2 0 0 8 0 0 8 9 8 6 8 A R* THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY RECENLLi AUG 15 2008 CITY CF BURLINGAME TITLE OF DOCUMENT: RESOLUTION 65-2008 DENYING APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW BASEMENT AREA TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 1790 ESCALANTE WAY ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE, IN BURLINGAME APN: 025-352-030 Owner: DAVID ZIIANG RESOLUTION NO. 65-2008 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME, DENYING THE APPEAL OF JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S MAY 27, 2008, APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A BASEMENT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW BASEMENT AREA TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THAT: WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved applications for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit, Special Permit for a basement and Parking Variance, and adopted a Categorical Exemption, related to a first and second story addition and new basement area to an existing single family dwelling on property located at 1790 Escalante Way (APN: 025-352-030), and owned by David Zhang, 1790 Escalante Way, Burlingame, California; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's May 27, 2008 approval was appealed by Jeffrey and June Kaufman, and the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal on July 21, 2008; denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1(e)(1), which states that additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the strurturPs hafnra fha addition. Said Design Review, Hillside Area Constructio Permit are approved subject to the conditions Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Are and Special Permit are set forth in the staff meeting. n Permit, Parking Variance and Special set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Area Construction Permit, Parking Variance report, minutes, and recording of said 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo, 0 ' Mayor 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. City Council Agenda — July 21, 2008 APPEAL — 1790 Escalante Way I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of July, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Deal, Keighran, Nagel NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Baylock, O'Mahony ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None J hereby certify this to be a full, true anr, correct copy of the document it pu_ports to be, the original of which ie or, file in my office. Dated: r. City of `Bldrlingame 2of2 EXHIBIT A Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3, and date stamped March 28, 2008, sheets Al, A2, A6 and A7, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that during the construction phase of the project, there shall be no more than 3 construction vehicles plus a debris box, on the property at any time; 3. that a soils report shall be prepared and submitted to the Building Official for review and approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for project construction; 4. that in the event that damage to the fence on the property at 3130 Atwater Drive occurs due to construction of the project, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement of the damaged fence; 5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007 and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 24, 2007 and October 22, 2007, memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memo shall be met; 6. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition, the debris box shall be placed within the driveway of the subject property; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A Conditions of Approval —1790 Escalante Way Approved by the City Council on July 21, 2008 11. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 2of2