HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.01.07.:.CLOSED SESSION
Pending Litigation (Govemment Code g 5a956.9(a)):
Louis Marini vs. city of Burlingamg San Mateo Superior court
Case No. Ct\t 4l93gz
BT]RLINGAME CITY COI]NCIL AGENDA
Rncrn.ln lt{nnrnrc - Moxnay Jarunny 7,2A0Z
PAGE 1 oF3
Threatened Litigation (Government Code g 54956.9(b)(l), (3XC))
Demand of State of California
1. CALLTOORDBR
2.
3. ROLLCALL
4' MINUTES - Special Meeting ofDecernb er r7,2llr;Regurar
Meeting ofDecember 3,200r & speciar pranning/counci-l Meeting
of November 28,2001
5. CBR]EMONIAL MATTERS
a Badge Pinning Rocque yball4 Deputy Fire Marshal
6' PUBLIC HEARTNGS Thcmayormayrimitspeakcntothrecminutaach
a- ordinance Revising Fees for water Service (Frow Tests,
Temporary rrtrfater Services and Meter krstallations)
b- Request forpermit to keep three dogs, 1252 capuchino Ave.
CiA of Barlingag,e'.
";CITY HALL - SOI PNTM,OSE ROAD
BT.JRLINGAM4 CALIFORNIA 940 I 0(650)55&7200 ',,;' . i:
S-a-G_GE;TED-AQlrgtN
6:30 p.m., Conference Room A
Adopt
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Approval
Presentation
Hearing/Action
Review
Discussion/Inhoduction
7.
8.
LUBLIC C0MMENTS At rhis tinre persms in the audience may speak m any
Iry.q 1[ agenda m any other matrer *itt in o" ;*isdictim of the co,ncir. Thenalnh M. Brown Ac1(th€-slate locar agency qen-mecting law; pr*rruits
"o,r"n r-r'acting or any matrer which is not on o. ,g*d;. rt i, ur-p"ii"vli-".,rliro,"ro
such matters to stafffr investigatiur andL actiqr. n
"
M"x;;tti*irp""r..". tothnee minutes each.
a. Housing Element Review by Council
b- consider Introduction of ordinance Restricting Hours for Ioading
and Unloading that cause a noise disturbance in a residential
district
c. Adopt Resolution oflntention to considerrerroval of the cityofDaly city from boundaries of San Mateo county Tourism Businesslnprovement District and Intnoduce ordinanc" i**oig Dstrictto remove Daly City fiom boundaries ofDistict
Adopt/Inhoduce
BT]RLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGEI\IDA
IfEcur,AB Mnnrmrc - Moxn^lv Jluulnv 712002
Plcn2 or3
CW of Burlingamo
CITY HALL - 501 PRIIVROSE ROAI)
SURUNCAI\,TS, CALIFORNIA 949I O
(650) 558-7200
Approve
Set Hearing
t
9.CONSENT CALEI\IDAR - Items on the Consent Calendar are acted on
"@;".r r.pu.ii discussion and/or action are requestedby a cormcil
mmber.
a. Resolution Accepting Burlingame Shoreland Easement Sewer
Rehabilitation City Project No. 9853(2)
b. Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant -
BART Shuttle & Resolution Authorizing Administration
Agreeme,nt and Grant - CalTrain Shuttle
c. Requastby ciuLibrarian to attend out of state conference'in
Arizona
d. Warants & PaYroll November, 2001
e. Annual Report on RCN Fiber Cable Installation
f. Approve Unit Reduction for Assessment Basis for Bel-Mateo
iviotel from 32 units to 23 units under the San Mateo County
Tourism Business Improvement Dishict
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
OLD BUSII\IESS
NEW BUSINESS
a. Setting an Appeal Hearing fot ll47 Rollins Road
ACKNOWLBDGMENTS
aCommissionMinutes:PlanningDec'10&Dec'19'2001;
Beautification, Dec- 6; Traffic, Dec' 13; Library, Nov' 13
b.De,partmentReports:BuildingNov',Z}0l;Finance'Nov'30'
2001; Police, November, 2001
c.IrtterfromDorothyAzevedo-Scorpiniti,Burlingame,CA
regarding BART coming to Burlingame
e. Irtter from Mary Macdonald,34zBlm Street, San Mateo
regarding dangerous pedestrian crosswalk at california & Lorton;
response from Frank Erbacher
10.
11.
12.
13.
BURLINGAME CITY COT]NCIL AGENDA
Rncur,.lR Mrnrntc - Monroay Jamtany 7rZ00Z
PAGE 3 oF3
14. ADJOURJ\MENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-
T203atleast2{hoursbeforethemeeting. AcopyoftheAgendaPacketisavailableforpublicreviewatthe
City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before thc meeting and at the
meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site or
listen live on our LIVE365 Broadcast via the website.
NEXT MEETING -23,2002
CiA of Burlingsme
CIry HALL. 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD
BI.]RLINGAME, CALIFORMA 940 I O
(650) 558-7200
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
BURLINGAMB, CALIFORNIA
December l7r200l
1. SPECIAL MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in Conference Room A.
The meeting was called to order at 5:01 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Respectfully submitted,
Cr^-J c/4Arr.o
BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY
None
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
4. STUDY SESSION
a. Studv Session Resardine POA Neeotiations
City Manager Nantell noted the reason for the closed session was to discuss the current negotiations
with the Police Officers Association.
5. CLOSED SESSION:
Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: City Negotiators:
City Manager, Human Resources Director, IDEA Labor Organization: Burlingame Police Officers
Association, City Attorney.
Council adjourned to closed session to discuss the POA negotiations and to instruct the City's
negotiators.
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 5:35 p.m.
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
1Burlingame City Council December 17,2001
UNAPPROYED MINUTES
BURLINGAME, CALItr'ORNIA
I)ecember 3,2001
CLOSED SESSION:
Conference with Real Property Negotiations pursuant to Government Code $ 54956.8:a. Property: City Parking Lots K and L
Negotiators: City Manager, City Attorney, City Planner, Public Works Director & City
Engineer
Negotiating Parties: Safeway Stores, Inc.
Under Negotiation: Exchange of property involving parking spaces. Instruction to include
area to be exchanged and consideration for exchange.
CA Anderson noted Council met in closed session at 6:15 p.m. regarding the above referenced matter.
1. RJGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDEB
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:03 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA}ICE TO THE FLAG
Led by Officer J Mason.
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY
None
4. MINUTES
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of November 19, 2001 and November
20,2001; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
5. CEREMONIAL
Chief Missel presented a commendation to Sergeant James Ford, Officer Charles Witt, Oflicer Dale
Wild and Communication Dispatcher Christine Granucci for their exceptional work at a police incident
on November 16, 2001.
IBurlingame City Council December 3,2001
6. PUBLICHEARINGS
a, AdoDt Ordinance #1674 to chan se Parkins Meter Rates in the Burlingame Avenue Business
District
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Charlie Dreschler and David Kincaid spoke in opposition of
raising the parking meter rates. CliffWoods, Chicken Chicken, spoke in favor of raising the parking
meter rates.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Ordinance #1674 to raise parking meter rates in the
Burlingame Avenue Business District; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by
voice vote, 5-0.
b. Review of the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant a Parking Variance for a Chanse in
Use from Retail to Oflice Use at 247 California Drive. Zoned C-l Subarea B. Burlineame
Avenue Commercial Area
CP Monroe recommended Council hold a public hearing to review the Planning Commission's decision
to grant a parking variance for a change in use from retail to office use at 247 California Drive.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, Attomey for London Road Desigr, spoke on
behalf of the owner/tenant. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed.
Councilman Galligan noted that this business generates over $1 million in taxable sales each year;
believes it is a retail business and a parking variance is not required. He then moved to make this a
determination, thereby making the variance moot because a retail use would be replacing another retail
use. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. Councilman Galligan, maker of the
motion, suggested a modification to the motion that graphics and desigr businesses with substantial
taxable sales should be considered retail businesses. The amendment was agreed to by the second.
There was more discussion and Vice Mayor Coffey suggested that the motion be further amended to
note that graphics and desigr businesses should only be considered retail if they are pedestrian friendly
and have walk-in retail business. The maker and second of the original motion agreed and clarified that
the business being discussed was a "graphic art and design business".
Mayor Janney called for a voice vote on the determination to define graphic art and design business as a
retail business so long as it met the several criteria established. The motion passed on a 5-0 voice vote.
c. Public Hearins on Aoplication for Off-Sale Liquor License at 1400 Burlineame Avenue
CA Anderson noted the owners of the Burlingame Smoke Shop, 1400 Burlingame Avenue, have applied
for an off-sale liquor license with the Alcohol Beverage Control Departrnent. The ABC looks at the
concentration ofliquor stores and stores that sell liquor within census tract; from those census tract they
determine ifunder Califomia Law, there appears to be an over concentration ofsales ofliquor in that
area. The ABC is obligated under state law to notifu the city and allow the City Council to make a
recommendation or determination to the ABC as to whether this off-sale liquor permit application serves
Bnrlingame CityCouncil ' Oecember 3, 2001
DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Ordinance #167 4 to raise on-street parking meter rates in the
Burlingame Avenue Commercial District.
the public convenience a necessity. CA Anderson recommended Council hold a public hearing to
determine what recommendation to communicate to the ABC regarding the off-sale license application
at 1400 Burlingame Avenue.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Randall Kaufrnann, 1501 Chapin #105, and Tom Paine, 728
Concord Way, spoke in favor ofthe issuance of a liquor license at this location. Ashook Patel, owner of
the Burlingame Smoke Shop, also spoke in favor ofreceiving the off-sale liquor license application at
1400 Burlingame Avenue and stated that liquor would only be sold from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. There
were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed.
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve the off-sale liquor license at 1400 Burlingame Avenue
from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; seconded by Mayor Janney, approved by voice vote, 4-1, with
Councilman Galligan dissenting.
d. Adopt Ordinance #1675 Deletin e Section 6.08.09 0 Regardine Airport Parkins Facility Business
Licen se Tax to Conform Code to Measure O Adooted on N ber 6.200I
CA Anderson noted that as part of the process ofbeing ready to implement the proposal contained in
Proposition Q adopted by the voters on November 6, 2001, the Municipal code must be amended to
delete the current provision regarding airport parking facilities. The proposed Ordinance would provide
the transition on November 30, 2001, from the airport facility tax to the commercial parking facility tax
for any business that is subject to both. Measure Q will go into effect on November 30. Both taxes are
payable on a quarterly basis, so this ordinance seeks to clarify the payment dates for the current quarter
under the transition.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance #167 5; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony,
approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilman Galligan recusing himself due to owning share in a
parking facility in a neighboring city.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jo Chamberlain, 501 Lucy Lane, Half Moon Bay, and Patricia Gray, l616 Adeline Drive, spoke
regarding the Green Party in Burlingame. Dan Anderson, 728 Vemon Way, spoke regarding the
preservation of Washington Park.
8. STAT'T'RE PORTS AIID CO CATIONS
a. Introduce Ordinance for Revisions to Fees for W ater Service (Flow Tests. Tempo rary Water
Services and Meter Installation)
DPW Bagdon recommended Council introduce the Ordinance to revise fees for water service (flow
tests, temporary water service and meter installation). The existing water rates and connection fees were
adopted by Council on July 16,2001, however, certain other fees relating to water services were not
included in the adopted ordinance.
3
Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001
Mayor Janney requested CC Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilman Galligan
made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved
unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance; seconded by
Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney requested CC Musso
publish a summary ofthe Ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption.
b. Council Assisn ments for 2002
EA Weber recommended Council review and revise council assignments for the calendar ye ar 2002.
c.Plannins Commissi on Aonointment
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to appoint Michael Brownrigg and Christopher Keele to the two
vacant positions on the Planning Commission; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved by voice
vote, 4-1, with Councilwoman O'Mahony dissenting.
9. CONSENTCALENDAR
a.ADDrove Rota List for Offices of Mayor an d Vice Mavor
EA Weber recommended Council approve the rotation list for Mayor and Vice Mayor for the coming
year
b. Resolution 132-2001Authorizins Transfer for Accountin Trainin g Contractg
ACM Becker recommended Council approve Resolution #132-2001 authorizing $15,000 transfer from
Reserve for Contingencies to Finance Conhactual Services.
c. Resolution 133-2001 Aporovins t for Maintena nce of Athletic Fields at Franklin.
McKinlev and Roosevelt Elementarv Sch ools and Burlinsame Inter te School
DPR Schwartz recommended Council approve the Resolution #133-2001 approving Agreement for
Maintenance of Athletic Fields at Franklin, McKinley and Roosevelt Elementary Schools and
Burlingame lntermediate School.
d.Authorize City ttornev to Join in Amicus Cu riae Brief in Bonnano vs. Cen Contra Costa
Transit Authori Case N o. A087846 at no cost to the tv of Burlinsame
City Attomey requested Council authorize him to join in Amicus Curiae Brief at no cost to the City in
Bonnano vs. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority, which is now pending befote the Califomia
Supreme Court.
Comcilman Galligan made a motion to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
4
Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001
'a
Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City.
11. OLD BUSINESS
Councilwoman Baylock noted she had received some complaints regarding the live kansmission of
Council meetings and offered some suggestions on how to remedy the problem.
12. NEW BUSINESS
City Manager Nantell noted that the Public Works department was featured on a local newscast on
Wednesday, November 28'h, during a very heavy storm. The newscast was shown to the Council.
13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Commission Minutes: Planning, November 26,2001; Parks & Recreation, November 15, 20011,
Library Board of Trustees, October 16,200l
b. Department Reports: Police, October 2001
Letter from Ronald and Linda Field, 1249Paloma, regarding request to rezone
Paloma/Lagona/C apuchino area
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjoumed the meeting at9:12 p.m.
Respectfu lly submitted,
a.
c.
0,*3?wauD
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
5
Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001
CITY O['BT]RLINGAME
JOINT CITY COUNCIL and PLAIINING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
November 28,2001
City Hall
Conference Room A
I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Janney called the November 28, 200l,joint meeting of the
City Council and Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Council Members: Baylock, Cof,ley, Galligan, Janney,
O'Mahony, md Planning Commissioners: Auran, Boju6s,
Keighran, Key, Mink and Vistica
Absent: Commissioner Osterling (arrived at7:25 p.m.)
StaffPresent: City Manager Jim Nantell, City Planner, Margaret
Monroe; City Attorney, Larry Anderson.
IV APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was suggested that item 4, regarding the scope and objectives of
the proposed specific Area Plan for the north end of the city be
done first since it would take less time and the
workload/composition .of the Planning Commission discussion will
follow. There was consensus about the change to the agenda.
V. SCOPE AND OBJECTIYES O[' TIIE SPECIX'IC AREA PLAN STUDY II'OR TIIE
NORTH END OF BURLINGAME
CP Monroe reviewed the progress that the Planning Commission has made in defining the study
area for the proposed Specific Area Plan and the scope. She noted that the Commission has
appointed a subcommittee to work with her to further define the project scope and process for the
RFP; she anticipates that the RFP would be circulated in January,2002.
Discussion focused on: cost of the study and availability of money in the current planning
budget to commence work; it was noted that it is timely to do this study, it should have a high
priority and it is important to find a good consultant; subcommittee members are thinking about
ways to refine the study, it should start with an assessment of the entire area and move from that
to identiffing the focus for the more detailed specific area plan; glad that the entire M-l zoned
area is included in the initial study area; Council should be included in the refining process
identi$ing the SAP area after the broad based analysis; clarified that the proposed study area is
entirely on the west side of 101; focused study should drop out areas which-are functioning all
City of Burlingame Joint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2001
right now; given the impacts of BART and the dynamics created by that transit terminal, should
the north end of the Bayfront area also be included; can put that in a subsequent study since the
economic pressure is off at the moment and we have some development guidelines in place for
the Bayfront area east of 101; don't want to take on too big an area at one time; there was
considerable discussion around the issue of whether there is outside funding available for
preparing the planning study and for making improvements once the specific area plan is in
place; it was concluded that the future private developers' role in funding public improvements
identified in the SAP should be addressed in the plan; an error on the map attachment was noted,
the westerly boundary of the area on the map did not follow Marco Polo, this should be
corrected; the plan should address the impacts of future electrification of the CalTrain line,
especially the physical and visual impacts. There were no further comments on this item. C.
Osterling arrived at7:25 p.m.
VI. WORKLOAD AND COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION
CM Nantell presented the staff report and suggested a round-table process for addressing this
issue and identifuing areas of consensus. He pointed out that over the past several months there
has been discussion among the Council, Planning Commission, press and public about how to
structure the commission to address its work load and whether this should affect the organization
of the commission. The staff report identified five perspectives on the issue. He asked that each
council member and planning commissioner at the table speak for three minutes on the issues.
At the end of each set of comments the others could ask clarifying questions. From this
commentary the group would compile a list of concerns and interests, as well as identiffing
where there was consensus. Council could then use this input in considering a strategy for filling
the current vacancies on the Planning Commission, no action decisions would be made tonight.
From the discussion there was strong consensus that the Planning Commission should continue
to have 7 members and there was no desire presently to restructure the commission. A variety of
reasons were identified for this conclusion including: that 7 provides a diversity of perspectives;
provides a cushion for a quorum if someone is absent or must recuse themselves so business is
not intemrpted; provides more members to share subcommittee responsibilities; allows a
changing mix of commissioners and points of view on subcommittees; do not want to increase
size so more able to miss meetings, but know commissioners are responsible and careful about
attendance; with fewer than 7 do not think the subcommittee system would work; have had
experience with 9 people on a cofilmission and it only elongates the meetings, 7 is a good size
provides diversity with manageable size; diversity is good, present commission has proven they
can operate effectively with diverse group, design professionals did a good job of developing
guideiines which the lay people on the commission and new comers to the process can easily use;
members of the commission need to have a holistic vision for the long term future of the
community and the ability to work collaboratively with the public to achieve this vision.
A second point of consensus was that there should be a mix of professionals with design sawy
and lay people with a good understanding of the community on the Planning Commission. A
variety of observations were made to support this: would like a mix of 3 to 4 (either way) of
design and non-design oriented people on the commission that balance is was a key element in
the Commission's many important accomplishments in the past few years and developed a
a
City of Burlingame Joint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2001
design review process which works with few complaints; prefer 3 professionals (could be
contractors, architects, designers, engineers), but the lay people look at how proposal fits into the
neighborhood; need a variety of professional expertise; would like at least two architects because
they have the broadest understanding of development and spacial planning and can often spot
design alternatives which can cause projects to comply with code requirements; with recent
extension of design review it would be good to have someone with commercial design expertise;
the contract design reviewers provide a safety net for a commission which may have fewer
design/construction professionals in its make-up, such professionals may not always be in the
applicant pool; lay commission should rely on the Planning staff and should be able to function
without an architect; focus should be on getting the best people on the Planning Commission not
meeting a quota of professionals; believe in the value of lay people on appointed boards and
commissions so do not want the commission overwhelmed with professionals; support lay
people, after a period of time they learn about issues and how to deal with the community; there
will be change, system needs to be able to work with whoever is participating, staff has an
obligation to help the Commission make the right decision.
During the discussion there were four issues identified which the group concluded should be
addressed in the future, most likely at the next joint meeting of the City Council and Planning
Commission in February. These were: (l) what specific design skills need to be available on the
commission; (2) what is the advantage and should be the scope of staff recommendations; (3)
managing work load the commission needs the time to do long term planning; and (4) what is the
appropriate screening process for projects destined to go to the Planning Commission. There
were no further comments.
YII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following people spoke from the floor: Linda Abbey 2415 Adeline Drive; Ken Castle,l4ll
Drake Avenue, Jerry Deal 1226 Paloma; Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater; Russ Cohen, 605
Lexington; Tom Paine ,728 Concord. Have raised issues regarding the Sisters of Mercy property
with both the City Council and Planning Commission, was given contact at the campus to call
when had a problem, called about a parking and safety problem and the person filed a complaint
with the Police Department. Would like a clarification about the Brown Act and its range of
control regarding discussion and dialogue between members of the public and the City Council,
would the City Attorney look into this? Regarding tonight, have been frustrated that we have not
done more broad based planning, developers feel that they can do the master planning for us
without asking, residents need to be proactive; clear need to revise the General Plan, should be
addressed by at least one item on each agenda; concerned about the lack ofan overall plan for the
Bayfront, needs to be done before an application is made. Work often with the planning staff, do
not have a Planning Department have a reaction deparhnent, need a planning staff that can plan
development concepts; people forget that design professionals can do a lot of things, do need a
contractor and engineer on the commission, Osterling's landscape skills are also useful; then
need a couple of lay people; design professionals are reluctant to apply because ofthe negative
things that have happened resulting in a why-get-involved mood; did have something good going
need to change the public perception and recoup so more design professionals will apply. Thank
Jerry Deal for spearheading all the design review; recall the original design for the library, it was
terrible, evolved to a gem because people became involved, shows good comes from conflict;
-3-
City of Burlingame loint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2001
people are more confident in the commission when there are professionals on it; this was
certainly the case with the storage facility proposal on Howard. Would like to see diversity
within categories on the Commission, need design community represented. The city needs to
take into account the existing neighborhoods and have development complement what is
existing, the city should undertake a master plan for recreation and park facilities for both
preservation and expansion. There were no other comments from the floor.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Janney at 9:00 p.m.
JtCCPCminl1.28.01
-4-
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
December 10, 2OO1
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
1t7 to2
6a
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REVISING FEES FOR WATER SERVICE (FLO
SERVICES AND METER INSTALLATIONS}
ESTS, TEMPORARY WATER
RECOMMENDATION: It is reconrmended that City Council hold a public hearing to:
A. Adopt proposed ordinance.
B. Direct City Clerk to publish a srmrmary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROUND: The existing water rates and connection fees were adopted by Council on July 16, ZOO|
However, certain other fees relating to water services were not included in the adopted ordinance.
DISCUSSION: The City charges fees for water flow tests, temporary water services and meter installations.
Some of these fees have not been adjusted since 1983. The attached ordinance revises the fees to achieve full
cost recovery for all labor and materials.
Notice of the public hearing for January 7,2002, regarding the fee revisions was included in the water bills
mailed throughout the city over the last two months.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance
BUDGET IMPACT: This ordinance will not affect the operating budget as the costs incurred will be offset
by the revenues received from tests, temporary water services and meter installations.
Tel. 650-558-7230
t-.City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Ordinance 4 Water Svc 2.wpd
lh-
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
15
T6
t7
l8
T9
20
21
22
Z)
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING REVISIONS TO FEES FOR WATER SERVICE
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section l. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No.
1660 adopted July 16, 2001. Notice of proposed revisions to the connection fees and of the
public hearing on the fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and duly published in
a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public hearing and due
study and deliberation, has determined that the cost of installations and testing has increased
substantially. The last increase in meter installation fees occurred in 1997 by Ordinance No.
1570. The last increase in flow testing fees occurred in 1983 in Resolution No. 9-83. These fees
will better attribute the actual costs of system costs to the persons actually using the services
rather to the ratepayers as a whole or to the City in general. In construction and maintenance of
the City water system, the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to
build, maintain, and operate the water system. The fees adopted in this ordinance are not
discriminatory or excessive.
Section 2. Subsection (2X0 of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
(f) When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city
according to the size of the service as follows:
5/8" through 1" $SO
l'112" and 2" $80
Over 2" $100 minimum
In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the
testing fee and make adjustments in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar
months preceding the date of the request for a test.
In the event the meter was recording accurately, the fee shall be retained. On services
over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent
a
(15%) for overhead should exceed the $100 fee
Section 3. Subsection (2Xg) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
(g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval
of the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative, upon deposit of
$750. The fixed service charges for the temporary meter shall be $43.00 per month for one-inch
meters, and $85.00 per month for three-inch meters. Charges for the water consumed shall be
as stated in Subsection (2)(b) above.
Section 4. Subsection (2X) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
0) All domestic water service installations of sizes 314" to 2", inclusive, consisting
of corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and
installed by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line,
or to a point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or
other right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main
connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees:
5/8" bypass meter $ 325
3/4" service with meter $2,275
1" service with meter $2,300
l-ll2' service with meter $3,000
2" service with meter $3,200
All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer
than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and
installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%)
of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum
to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such
sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the
event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
l1
12
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be
charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the
excess shall be refunded.
Section 5. Except as expressly amended by this Ordinance, all other provisions of
Ordinance No. 1660 shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall go into effect sixty
(60) days after its adoption.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of
December, 200I, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_
_ day of__,200-, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CttETeik
C :\FILES\Water\2002fees.pwd.wpd
I
2
J
4
ORDINANCE NO. 1676
ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING REVISIONS TO FEES FOR WATER SERVICE
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section l. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No.
1660 adopted July 16,2Wl. Notice of proposed revisions to the connection fees and of the
public hearing on the fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and duly published in
a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public hearing and due
study and deliberation, has determined that the cost of installations and testing has increased
substantially. The last increase in meter installation fees occurred in 1997 by Ordinance No.
1570. The last increase in flow testing fees occurred in 1983 in Resolution No. 9-83. These fees
will better attribute the actual costs of system costs to the persons actually using the services
rather to the ratepayers as a whole or to the City in general. In construction and maintenance of
the City water system, the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to
build, maintain, and operate the water system. The fees adopted in this ordinance are not
discriminatory or excessive.
Section 2. Subsection (2X0 of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
(0 When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city
according to the size of the service as follows:
5/8" through 1" $SO
l'112" and2" $80
Over 2" $100 minimum
In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the
testing fee and make adjustrnents in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar
months preceding the date of the request for a test.
In the event the meter was recording accurately, the fee shall be retained. On services
over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
l2
l3
t4
15
16
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
2
J
4
5
6
7l
8
9
10
ll
12
l3
t4
l5
l6
t7
l8
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(15%) for overhead should exceed the $100 fee.
Section 3. Subsection Q)G) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
(g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval
of the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative, upon deposit of
$750. The fixed service charges for the temporary meter shall be $43.00 per month for one-inch
meters, and $g5.00 per month for three-inch meters. Charges for the water consumed shall be
as stated in Subsection (2)(b) above.
Section 4. Subsection (2Xi) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows:
6) All domestic water service installations of sizes 314" to 2", inclusive, consisting
of corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and
installed by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line,
or to a point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or
other right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main
connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees:
5/8" byPass meter $ :ZS
3/4" service with meter $2,275
1" service with meter $2,300
l-112" service with meter $3,000
2" service with meter $3,200
All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer
than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and
installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%)
of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum
to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such
sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the
event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
1l
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be
charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the
excess shall be refunded.
Section 5. Except as expressly amended by this Ordinance, all other provisions of
Ordinance No. 1660 shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall go into effect sixty
(60) days after its adoption.
I, ANN T' MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of
December, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_fth
day oflqollaql,2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHoNY
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:NONE
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: NONE
C :\FILES\Water\2002fees.pwd. wpd
t\
AGENDA 6b
STAFF REPORT
#ITEM
MTG.
DATE 1t712
TO:Honorable avor and Council
DATE
FROM:
SIIBJECT:Re ue st for permit to keep three dogs
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing to determine whether or not Mr. Bill Roper and Ms. Kyle Matthews
will be allowed to keep three dogs at the residence. The city ordinance allows no more than two without a
permit.
DISCUSSION:
This issue was received as a code enforcement item on September 17,2001when two neighbors complained
that there were three dogs being kept at 1252 Caplchino Ave, a single family residence.
Mr. Roper and Ms. Matthews request to permanently keep the three dogs and consider them part of their family
Notices of the public hearing were mailed to all properties within 400 feet of the residence.
Background information and supporting documents are attached to this report.
Affachment
Distribution
Introduction to 0ur Petition
\\'lre1 a prontotir)n at ut-\ (Bill) ur)rk necessitatc-rl a nrrtrc ll'r.rnt [-ttn Beaclt. (.alifbrnia to thc Bar
Area. one of our prirnar'l,concenrs *as tinding a house zrnd a neighborhood as thntastic as the one \\e
rvere leaving.We searched for six ntonths befbre tinall-v'- finding our lte\\'home at 1252 Captrchino
Avenne in Burlingame. The style of the lrome lvas the same as the one \r.'e \\'ere leaving behind and
the yard was perfect for our dogs. Additionally. rve immediately f'ell in love u,ith the nlrmerous
restaurants and stores on Broadway, all withirr rvalking distance of our house. We were shocked and
saddened to learn only after buying our home that the city of Burlingame has an ordinance limiting
the number ofdogs that can be kept.
To be honest, after searching for a house for so long, if we had known about this ordinance, rve u,ould
never had taken a risk and bought our new home. Unfoftunately, after being cited by the city, rve now
find ourselves rvith the option of either getting rid of one of our dogs or going tlirough a petition and
permit process with the city. Since we desperately do not want to break Llp our farnily. rve have
chosen to spend countless hours fulfilling the requirements to present this petition.
We have done our best to provide you witlr much more than just the required signatures. Along with
all of the perlinent data, we have also given you a look into our home. olrr reasons for owning our
dogs and personal letters of reference for both the animals and ourselves. We have also taken the time
to provide you with photographs of the environment in which the dogs are cared for as rvell as photos
ofBartleby,Loki and Azrael. Finally.rvehavesecuredlettersf}omourveterinariansinregardstothe
disposition and breeds of the dogs. Although this ordinance does not concerrr itself r.r,ith the breed of
the anirnals in question, we felt it was appropriate and responsible to shorv the City Courrcil that we
are dedicated, caring and concerned owners.
We were also instructed by the Office of Code Enforcement that rve should inforrn the city of any
dates when we will not be available to attend aCity Council rneeting. We are unavailable to attend
meetings on November 5'l'.2001 or December 3'd'2001 due to ontstanding business obligations.
We want to thank you in advance for taking the tirne and effort to review these rnaterials and we are
confident that yon will find us to be not only the type of people who are able to properly care for our
pets, but also upstanding new citizens of Burlingame.
Respectfully,
William D. Roper Ms Matthews
5
Wh"v Do We Have Three Dogs?
Tlte're are a f-eu'reasotts uh\ we hal.e three dogs attcl erert tltore rrht te \\nnt to k!-ep therl. Bartlebr.
Loki and Azrael are all rescue cases. While the specifics of horv they came to be rvith us are coverecl
in their bio-eraphies. the most impoftant aspect of their place in our lives is that u,e provicle a good
home for thenr. Tlrey reside itt an atmosphere of loving attentiou arrd rve krrorv tlrat tl-ris is the most
essential thing that \rye can give thenr. They' are rvell treated, rvell fed and kept in a safe and
comfortable environmetrt. With as ntan)' animals as there are in shelters throughout the cir),and state.
we are proud to provide a -eood honre for these animals.
They also provide dedicated and loyal companionship. My rvife Ky,le works from home and rvhile I
atn at the office, Azrael makes for an excellent friend around tlre lrouse. The difficulties of adjustirrg
to both a llew neighborhood and city, as well as rvorking without the social structure of an office, are
eased by the proximify of pets. They provide a necessary distraction from the rigors of daily life and
the effects of their unconditional affection is something that is difficult to properly express in rvords.
I travel frequently for my company and having three larger dogs is an excellent source of home
security. Both during the day when my wife Kyle is home alone and during the periods of time rvherr
I am away, the dogs are a deterrent to anyone who may have ill or crirninal intentions tor,vards our
home or ottr selves. The police commonly state that the best form of home security is a clog, and r,ve
have seen tl-re trtrtlr of this olt Inore thatr one occasion wlren suspicious indivicluals have strayecl arvay
frotn our yard or door ttpon hearing the dogs bark or seeirrg them over the fence.
Ordinance 9.04.040 states, "lt is a public nuisance for any person, firnr or corporation to have. keep or
maitttain or cause to be kept or maintained on any premises lvithin the city, rnore than tr.l,o dogs,
either male or female of the accepted age of nine months and over." A nuisance. as clefined b1.' the
City of Burlingarne, is anything "rvlrich is dangerous, iujurious or a menace to health or safety.. or is
indecent or off-ensive to the senses. or is an obstruction to the free use of properly, so as to interfere
with the comfortable enjoyrnent of life or property, or which unlar.vfully obstructs the free passage or
use in the customary Inaltner of any stream. or any public park, square, street or highway. or rvhich by
anyprovision of this code is specificallydeclaredto be a nuisance;provided, however, nothingwhich
is done or maintained under the express authority of law is a nuisance.,,
Our dogs have never been cited for excessive barking, darnaging propefty, or for any behavior that
collstitutes a physical threat of bodily harm to any person. Their environment is clean and liealthy,
they are well fed and tlrey are secrrre in our yard and honre. They do not interfere with the enjoyrnent
of our neighbor's life or property and they do rrot obstruct passage to any public facilities. By the
defirrition set forth by tlre city, we do not feel that our clogs are in any way a rruisarrce to our
rreighborhood or the community at large.
Most importantly, rve sirnply do not want to break up our family. We have become incredibly
attached to allof our dogs and while we have no intention of getting more, we also desperately do not
wan to lose one. We hope that the work we lrave done in securing a large number of signaiures, as
well as the effofts put into tlris petition package, are proof that we have time, energy, facilities and
love enough to properly support our pets.
' llr
Description of Home and Pet Facilities
Our resicleuce at l25l Capgchino is a -l bedroom. I bath Tudor sh'le honte u'itlt a detachecl garage
that rvas convefied into a studio guesthouse lvith its olvn shou,er and toilet tbcilities. One of tlre ke1
factors for choosilg this horne is the ample lot on rvhich it is located, having not onl.v a grass areas for
tlre dogs to play on, but also a sizeable area to the side of the house for the construction and
maintenance of a dog run.
Since purchasing our home in July. lve have made great efforts to accolnlnodate our neighbors and
ourselves by insialling a new 6 foot, 6 inch high fence in the area of the dog rtrn facing the street and
bordering our neighbor's propefty. The ferrce is of sturdy red'ivood constrttctiotr rvith 3 feet of the
rnain 4x4s sunk into the ground. Additionally, the fence is secured to the coucrete rvalls of our ltouse
rvith steel L-brackets. There is no gate from the dog run to the street.
Both of our neighbors also have fences on the adjacent properties. Their fences are attached to ottr
fence that encloses the dog run. This provides additional assllrance that both our dogs and theirs
cannot escape throLrgh this part of the yard. Also, to prevent the dogs frorn digging under the fence.
we attached 6 inches of Chicken Wire to the bottorn of the fence. rvhicli is buried beneatlt the grotrnd.
TIre fence that borders our backyard is 4 feet, 6 irrches high with a 5-foot high, arched gate. Botli the
fence and gate are constructed of redwood and the fence is secttred to the concrete walls of the house
with steel L-brackets. All of the planks of the fence have been additionally secured with extra nails
and the gate has not onty a deadbolt-style lock that secures the gate into a 4x4 post, but it also has a
latch that is secured and padlocked whenever the dogs are in the run.
I lrave also personally tested the strength of all of the fences by applying rrry full 6'2",285 lb. frame
against them to ensure that they are as stable as possible'
We have recently added an odor-prevention system to the dog run to control any issues with smell
from animal waste. This has included the tilling of the hard dirt surface and the introduction of a layer
of ExStink (a product recommended by the Los Angeles Police and Coroners departrnent for
eliminating organic-based odors), 1-2 inches of large riverbed rock, topped by another layer of
ExStink. The aeration provided by the porous nature of the rock, the odor-controlling natttre of the
compound and the fact that we clean out their run trvice daily sliould provide a very clean
environrnent for the dogs. Only Bartleby and Loki utilize the run as Azrael has supervised access to
the remairrder of the yard.
We also intend to add pig-link fencing to tlre inside of the dog run to prevent possible chewing of the
fepce by our dogs. We have not encountered this as an isstte, but we are taking active, preventative
measures should they ever exhibit this interest.
Finally, the gate to our driveway is over 4 feet high and is secured by both a deadbolt-style lock that
secures the gate, but it also has a latch that is secured and padlocked whenever the gate is closed. For
both aestlretic and security reasons we intend to replace this gate with a high, wrought-iron gate after
the first ofthe year.
We understand the irnportance of rnaking sure our dogs are securely in our yard, mainly for the safety
and security of our animals. We have no interest or intent for them to be running loose in the streets.
While they are not aggressive towards people and we would never expect them to do any harm to a
person, we cannot be as sure of what someone may do to them We fully understand the issues
surrounding pit-bull type dogs and we have no desire to expose our dogs to anyone without our
supervision. We are cognizant and respectful of the feelings of others and we feel it is betterto avoid
potentially difficLrlt situations by closely monitoring and controlling or,rr pets.
Photographs of Dog Run
"?9 {
This is the 6'6" fence adjoining the property of our neighbors
This is where the 6'6" fence connects to the 4'6" fence leading into our back yard
This is the interior of the 6'6" fence that faces the street
This is the steel bracketing used to additionally secure the 6'6" fence that faces the street
:i
.t '*!t
.a _ {'pr.:i 'q!
.::a{+\
*
f,i
,
i.
This is the exterior ofthe 6'6" fence that faces the street
This is the steel bracketing and deadbolt on the 4'6" fence that faces the backyard
I
I
I
I
This is the current state of the dog run, complete with new rock and ExStink treatment
,
c €
i
This the
Absolute Odor ancl Srnell Rentover. A Teamr,r'ork Presents ETSTINK Page I of2
+o*
o,{
a'!
"},-ci
ssI
%
mes,TlNlK
100"/0 NATURAL
ODORELIMINATOR
GUARANTEED
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE
NON-TOXIC
Satl Us Toll Fr*e!
x -s88-s8x -ssss
'n **il$".s7?-1sfififfiClMre
,." 1r what is E'srlNK?h,
A porverlirl. 100% nirtLrral, environment li'iendll'. long-lasting cr,vstatlline tniueral that is
Guafanteetl f6 eliminate tnajor odors cause b1'': Pet Urine, Sarbage, Vomlt, Smoke'
Mildew, Cat Urine, Fish, Freon, Bacterial Decomposition, Hydrogen Sulfide,
Formaldehyde, anrl rnsre!
. -.rf,I
trf wno rvould use E*STINK?
Pet or,vners^ Veterinarians. Kennels. Floure C)r.vners. l{otels. f.urpet Nlaiuleuunc'e. .ltruilorierl
Scn,ice. Plunttrc.rs. Gy,'nts. Schools. I{ealth Cltibs. llospitals & (llinics. Restattratlts. Rc-al I'lsta[r:
Scrvicr.s. (lonvalesccnt.llorncs. Nulsing I[<ltttcs. [tctircnrcrtt Ilotttcs. Watcr'['rcttttrcnt. .lails &
polic:e Departrlents. flprgners. I)etail Shops. f'attlenten ancl Fire I)crpartntenls. I{ecotrtntetttlctl lt;r
hourc- owu!-rs lvltil havc hacl strrokc clantagc-!
:\_l\J where is E'STiNK Used?
Pet Areas. Aqualir.rms. Tennis shoes. Kitchens. Latmclry Roours. Hatnpers. Clltrsets. Diaper Pails.
Athletic Locliers. []asemcnts. Bird C'ages, C}'imc Scenes. Saf'es. Cars. I]oats. Vans, RV's. Garbagc
Birrs & Contpactors. Scnagc. (lafetcriers. (looking Oclors. I)rains. l,clungcs. Beclcling.
Reli.igerators & Freezers. Slorage Rtloms. Shoes. Decal,ing mu11er - plant ot'tltlinutl. or ztll-t' plitcc
thcre ma5,' bc att nnpleasaut oclor!
Irollorv these links fbr rnore intrornlation atrd orcleringl
http ://www.exstink.com/r012912001
Customer Testintonial Page 1 of4
-Lo.7,
d*
r)
+Yrv
s
I
mtrsT[IqK
1OO% NATURAL
ODOR E,LIMINATOR
GUARANTEED
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE
NON.TOXIG
What Customers Say About t:l'S"l'!NE(
January 19,2000
I was using i ' i l irr f'. on the carpets for cat urine, and a week later. after vacuuming, I noticed that
the mattecl-pile on the25 year old calpet had n-rysteriously revived. I then applied ExStink to the
other traffic ar"ar, to see if this was really happening. And it is. Tliis is a wonderful product.
Arro I Lund hpl anet,'rltheglid' net
April S, 2001
I had used ExSTINK before to get the smell of decaying meat out of afreezet that broke two
weeks before I discovered it and was very satisfied. Later that year, some gasoline for the mower
spilled in the trunk of the car. I cleaned up as much of it with paper towels as I could but the smell
oigasoline lingered. Then I remembered the ExSTINK. I knew that it wasn't recommended for
ur. o1 those t<inas of smells but I figured what did I have to lose. I first sprinkled ExSTINK all
over the carpeted area affected and put a pan of ExSTINK in the trunk and waited. After about
two days the smell was practically gone. I vacuumed the carpet and applied ExSTINK to the
carpet again and another pan full. Within a couple more days the srnell was gone. My neighbor
had the same kind of accident and I gave him some ExSTINK and it worked for hirn too. Yott
folks rnight not recommend it for gasoline smells but it sure worked for me. Thanks
Michael Uniontown, PA
January 30,2001
ExSTINK is a wonderful product. I used it in my children's room and the odors weere gone.
I will recommend this to anyone who needs to remove odors out of anything. It's wonderful.
Tammy Carney Glendora, Ca.
July 2000
To Anyone considering using an ExStink product: I work on dairy farms around the region.
When I get home, my clothes smell like the cows I have been around. No amount of
detergent, fabric softeners, dryer sheets, or odor eliminators could completely get rid of the
smell, and if a "non-cow" item was washed with my clothes by mistake, the smell was
transferred. I was skeptical, but figured I had nothing to lose by buying two two-pound
containers of ExStink powder. The first time I used it I put about 1/4 cup in the washing
hfin.//rxnrnrr ewcfink nnrn/errstnmer hfm'l 10t2912001
Custonler Testimor-rial Pagc' 2 of 4
machine and did not add anything other than rletergent. I n'as elated to find absolutely no
trace of corv odor rvhen the laundrl' rvas done! Once, just hours before a famill' bunch, my
dog had terrible diarrhea all over ih. Iining room rug. After the usual cleanup, I sprinkled -
gx"Stint< on the spots and rubbed it in rvith a brush. I then cleaned that up and there lvas NO
SMELL LEFTI i u- ,ro*o a lifelong user and hope that you will give the product a chance to
change your life too. Sue Bentley, Connecticut
September 2000
Norv please send the 8 lb. pait. It really rvorks on Cat Urine. Joanne Koenig, Nerv York.
Dear ICS, L2fift998
I am rvriting to tell you horv pleased rve are about your Extink product. Of all the products
and Home iemidies we used ,Exstink was the one that did the trick.Getting rid of the Cat
Urine smell was a great Triumph. Even our garage is odor free ! We are truly amazed horv it
just destroys the olor,and We are very happy tha! there is such a product - Thanks to the
internet we found you. Thank you , "James W. Piliero, Exmore, Va".
" I have a 25' Sportfisher with a 300 qt. fish hold on board. I always have trouble with odors
even after washing with straight simple green. The odors will wash away but return in a
week. I tried putting an 1/8 cup of i,:'S'I'i\il in the fish hold & to my amazement it removed
all odors. I am still using the same 1/8 cup I started with 6 months ago " Mike of Chinon Ca..
"For the past six months we have used your product, I','S'f lNni which has been very
successfui in helping us eliminate odors in both the jail and the property room which range
from perspiration to vomit. Thank you for introducing us to l'l'S'l trN K and we will continue
to use the product within our facility." Torrance POLICE DEPT., Lt. Michael Tamble'
Commander.
"As an executive in the hotel industry, I have used every odor eliminator there is - from
ozone machineso sprays, enzymes, and a host of others that have come, gone and remain.
We'll stick with I,.'S'I'!N K." COURTYARD by MARRIOTT, Century City, CA. Sonny
Jafie'ir, Gen. Mgr. '
"As fleet service manager for Hertz, I run into many nasty odors ranging from mildew,
spills per smells, vomit, cigarette smoke and even dead animals. E'S'l-ii\iK is the best
product we've found to eliminate all these odors." HERTZ CORP., San Jose, CA. Frank
Lawrence, Service Mgr.
"We had a week of nothing but rain and it was so damp in the house that our fireplace made
the first floor smell like damp burnt wood...but I didn't think much about it since I spend
most of my time upstairs in my office. One night in particular,I had company and everyone
was playing with my dog and we all kind of lost track of time and the dog had an accident on
the floor in the family room...no big deal...I have plenty of I'-'5'l'l N trr. on hand for such
situations...so I cleaned it up. Sprinkled some E\S'I'INK on it and let it go and forgot all
about it. The next day when I got up and went downstairs to have my morning coffee. It
caught my attention that as I got to the bottom of the stairs, I didn't smell any more damp
burnt wood...then I remember the ErSTINK...it not only took care of the accident my dog
had but it took the fireplace smell out of the house as well!. is the best product we've found
httn : //www. exstink. com/customer. html 1012912001
Customer Testimonial Page 3 of4
to eliminate all these o(lors." ., OHIO.
,,I c:ln non. 'GUARANTEE' to remove the kincls of odors I thought irnpossible betbre."
JANSSEN'S (Since 1939) Glendale, cA. Ralph Grecco, o$'ner.
"Although I have shelves futl of odor eliminators and deodorizers in my store. I recommend
L':i-f l\K because it simply u,orks better than all of the others put together-" AAA DYE &
CHEMICAL CO. Torrance, CA. Donald David, Orvner'
" One of our customers called complaining about a bad smell coming from under their
house. The smell was so bad that it rvas starting to make them sick. We suspected a broken
sewer line. It turned out to be a very big dead opossum. The smell was so bad, my man could
not get close enough to it to remove. We decided to take a dust mask & try rubbing some
il'$"t'lN tr on the outside of it. We did, & could not smell any odor through the mask from
the carcass when he lvent back under the house. The entire house & its air system stunk bad.
We took 6 lb. of E;.'S t'l:*{!(, spread around under the house & under the FAU. Turned the
blower on & within 30 minutes the odors were gone. D & R Plumbing,Inc.. Covina, Ca.&.
"I am often asked if I know of a product which is effective in eliminating the odors of
bacterial decomposition. We recommend Exstink." LOS ANGELES CORONERS'S
OFFICE. Los Angeles, CA. Crag R. Harvey.
" I had some relatives over one night and they are chain smokers...by the time they had left,
the house was so smoky that I could hardly breathe. I had to open windows just to air out
some of the smoke. Before I went to bed, I sprinkled a little II\STINK, around on the carpet
and by morning you would have never known I had chain smokers in my house just the
night
-before!!
The stuff works and it never ceases to amaze me!!! DEBRA, Cincinnati, Ohio.
"After a cat died in my new Cadillac. I tried everything to remove the odors. I was
preparing to reupholster the entire vehicle when I learned about I','ii i'*"t1".. It took two
applications. But the odors were 100o/o gone in two days -- and never came back! That 2 Ib.
boitle was the best $10.00 I ever spent! I think you're selling it too cheep." TOM RUUD,
Santa Ana, CA.
Toll Free 1 -888-881 -0898
{909} 877-t 9?6
F'ollow these links {on lnore inf,orrmaatiom ax}{tr orderirag!
eliminatingothing
Thibodea
-9K tsulllodorsournksworatbetter"N pet
aNte MotorCA.Los UX,TransportPOLISDEPTCEAngeles,ELEANG
Division.
http : //www. exstink. com/customer. html 1012912001
Daily Location Schedule
To address any concerns regarding the location of our dogs during any given time of the
dav. the follorving is a list of u'here the dogs are kept at all times and under what
conditions:
Azrael is in the house at all times, except when she is in the backyard under
supervision. She is not allowed access to the dog run.
Bartleby and Loki are in the side yard ONLY WHEN someone is home. Given that
Kyle works at home, the dogs will be in the dog run while she is working. The dogs
are allowed in the backyard only under supervision.
a
a
a
o
Bartleby and Loki are in the back house during all general absences by both Bill and
Kyle. They are also in the back house at night.
All dogs will be professionally kenneled during overnight or longer absences frorn the
house.
Complaints to Animal Control/Burlingame PD
11 the short time rve have lived in Burlingame. we have had lnore encollnters rvith the
police and animal control than at any other point in our lives. We felt it was important to
udd.6r this issue proactively so that the City Council would have a full understanding of
the circumstances surrounding these visits.
July 2,2001
General Call
At 8:00 a.m., two officers visited us from the Burlingame Police Department. While no
official "complaint" had been registered, they mentioned that they had been informed that
we owned three "pit bulls" and that we were one dog over the city's dog ordinance. They
said this wouldn't be an issue as long as the dogs stayed in the yard and didn't create a
constant disturbance.
July 3,2001
Dogs Loose
On our third day in the house, two of our three dogs broke out of the side yard.
Burlingame Police responded and, after telling them to "go home", the dogs went back
into the yard.
We attempted to have the fence replaced prior to gaining possession of the house. but met
with no success. Following the initial escape, the dogs were kenneled until a new fence
could be constructed. This occurred within two weeks of their escape. There have been
no additional escapes since the fence was replaced.
September 12,2001
Doe Fieht
We are aware that two calls were made to Animal Control to repofi dogs fighting. We
were on our honeymoon at the tirne and were having someone "stay" with the dogs (we
found out that this did NOT happen, despite assurances that this would occur in our
absence). The officer responding (Officer Dumanden) reported to us that he saw no
immediate safety concerns for either the dogs or the community.
We can only surmise what occurred between the dogs. Azrael had been separated from
Bartleby and Loki for approximately three weeks due to an injury. Our veterinarian was
concerned that she would reopen a cut she had on her foreleg as a result of playing with
the other dogs. Following the removal of her sutures and permission from the vet, our
housesitter reintroduced her to the dog run.
From all accotults. the tighting sctuttdecl horrible. Dr'spite thc noise. thr, tjght \\ils l.r()
nhere near AS bad as it sounded. Azrael looked the u'orse fbr n'ear. but sLrstainecl injulrc-s
that rvere indicative of a dominance fight lbite marks on and around her neck). She hacl to
have her original injur: re-sutnred, and the vet stitched up several small bites as a
precautionary measure. Neither of the other dogs required medical attention. The dogs are
now only allowed together when they are supervised by BOTH of us.
Given Azrael's nature, we were not at all surprised to learn that Loki had decided to take
charge. Azrael's habits of bone-stealing and dominance play had finally come to an end.
We have allowed the dogs to come together on a couple of occasions, and it is qr-rite clear
that Azrael has learned a valuable lesson. She immediately subrnits and we have seen no
furlher sign of aggression between the dogs. As a result of this event, we will be
professionally kenneling all three dogs during any overnight absence.
September 25,2001
A Complaint
A complaint was called in regarding our fence. While the officer responding (Officer
Dinneen) didn't see any problem with the fence, she did recommend that the fence be
better secured by bracketing it to the house. This was done within 48 hours of the call.
Kyle Lynn Matthews
A Brief Biography
I rvanted to take this opportunity to tell the City a bit about myself. My resume is too long and only
reflects my professional life.
I am a California native. being born in La Jolla, California. I Iived in the San Diego area for the t-lrst
34 years of my Iife. While in San Diego, I attended San Diego State University for rny undergraduate
degree in Clinical Psychology (8.A. in Psychology, 1986), and received my subsequentgraduate
degree in Counseling Psychology from National University (M.A., Counseling Psycholgy, 1995). I
moved to Glendale, CA, in 1998 to pursue a career opportunity.
Professionally. I have had two separate careers. I worked for I3 years in retail and retail management.
In that tirne, I spent seven years working for Bullocks/Bullocks Wilshire (currently knor,vn as Macy's),
and my final three years were spent in rnanagement positions rvith The Disney Stores, Inc.
I began working in the field of higher education as a result of my graduate work in 1993. I have served
as an educational evaluation officer, transfer specialist, manager of continuing education programs,
and an afticulation consultant. My most recent...and rewarding...position was in the role as
Coordinator for Transfer Admission at Woodbury University in Burbank, CA. In that role, I served as
the university's representative for transfer students coming from area community colleges. In addition,
I served as the university's Arliculation Officer, being responsible for the development and
tnaintenance of transfer contracts between WoodbLrry University and community colleges. I continue
to do this work frorn rny current home in Burlingame.
Personally, I spend my free time reading, acting, and caring for my horne, my new husband, and my
pets. I arn also a news junkie. We lrave no children, altlrough I consider my present family to be a
loving and cornplete one. While we have many friends in the Bay Area, I am still adjLrsting to my new
surroundings. I plan on continuing my work from home, and may utilize my expeftise in the area of
educational counseling to serve individuals in tlre community who are in need of guidance in tlreir
pursuit of higher education.
I have orvned pets allof my life. While t have been in situations (two) where one of rny beloved pets
had to be given up, they were given to the right people...my parents. I love my pets and all anirnals in
ways I cannot pttt to words, up to and including my insistence on a "capture and release plan" for most
errant insects in rny horne (fleas and ticks DON'T count). To give Llp one of my dogs would break my
heaft, as I made a commitment to each of them upon their adoption. To break such a commitment due
to an ordinance, not an act of violence, neglect, or nuisance on behalf of rnyself OR my pets, seems
unfair and unjust. Given that other families in Burlingame exceed the "dog limit," I would hate to see
their families broken up in order to comply with this ordinance, particularly if the farnilies have done
nothing to infringe upon the comrnunity at large.
I consider our pets members of our family. Within our family we have rules and regulations we mLlst
follow. Animal companions are not exempt from these rules, which include obedience, politeness, and
openness to friends and strangers alike. If these rules are violated, we are fully aware of our
responsibility in handling any repercussions from damaging or violent acts by our dogs. We knew that
when we took these dogs in that their lives would be free from a lifetime of neglect and violence. Only
by allowing them to remain witlr us can we guarantee them this. Should we be in the position to have
to give up one of our dogs, we will have broken that commitrnent. I, for one, am hopeful that we
won't be met with this outcome.
Witliam David Roper
A Brief Biograph,v
I rvanted to take this opportunity to tell the Citl, sornething about myself. My resume onl1.' reflects m1,
professional eristence and does not hold essential details regarding rnv private life.
I am a California native, being born in Concord, California. I Iived in the East Bay Area until the age
of 20. rvhen I transferred to California State University, Long Beach. While there, I worked torvards
an undergraduate degree in Commercial Music rvith an emphasis in Vocal Perfonnance. While I did
not complete my B.A. degree program in order to pursue professional musical interests, I remained in
close contact with the school and the community, choosing to stay in Long Beach for over 15 years. I
moved to Burlingame, CA, in July of 2001 to accept a promotion and greater responsibility within rny
company, Blizzar d Entertainment.
Professionally, I have been witlt Blizzard Entertainment for a little over 7 years. As Senior Director of
Developer Relations, I am responsible for overseeing and managirrg all external projects. as r.vell as
coordinating internal developrnent teams and heading Blizzard's project oversiglrt tearns. I have
rvorked directly as a producer or designer on all of Blizzard's top-selling products and have also been
instrurnental in providing Blizzard's voice content, both acting in and assisting in the direction of the
voice recording for the ll/arcraft, Diablo. and StarCraft franchises. I am also the rnain representative
for the company r.r,ith specialty and mainstrearn press, both nationally and internationally.
Pelsonally, I spend my free time reading, singing, playing computer games and caring for our home.
and lavishing atl-ections on n1y new rvife and our pets. I am also an avid sports fan, witli a long-time
love for the Giants and 49ers that earned ffre lrore than my share of grief from my Southern California
friends. While we have many friends (and my fathef in the Bay Area, leaving the great network of
friends in Long beach has taken some adjustrnent. Foftunately, rny work has become more challenging
and I now live mr:clr closer to the office so I can, at the same time, spend more time with my wife.
I have always been in a home with dogs. Growing up, my parents considered it to be essential to my
learning the lesson of responsibility. After finally moving into a house in Long Beach where I could
once again have pets, I took in two stray dogs that ended up moving out of state witlr a former
girlfriend. Wlren the opporlunity arose to fill the first home I had purchased with the Ioyal
comparrionship and protection offered by dogs, Ijurnped at it - and forlunately rny wife Kyle agreed
tlrat they would be a wortlry addition to our home.
We know of others within the city with more thau two dogs but yet have not had to undergo the
process of acquiring a permit. In fact, representatives of both the Office of the City Attorney Code
Enforcement Bureau and the City Clerk have infbrmed us that they coLrld find record of only one case
of a petition being cornpleted in regards to this ordinance. The perrnit was granted.
We have made a strong commitrnent to our pets and I hope that the obvious alnollnt of work and care
that has gone into this petition is proof positive that we look forward to maintaining a happy home for
a long time.
Azrael
Aztael came to live with us in July of 2000 at approximately three months of age. Duringa trip to the neighborhood Petco, we came across a young woman whose boyfriend hadfound an abandoned puppy in downtown Los angeles. The dog was very thin andCOVERED with fleas and ticks. The young woman, although ,iell intentioned, wasclearly unfamiliar with dogs (she owned snakes). Given that we had the accommodationsand the resources to care for the puppy, we took her home, cleaned her up, and saw toimmediate veterinary care for her.
She appears to be a Rhodesian Ridgeback mix, although we cannot say for sure. Sheweighs approximately 70lbs. She was spayed at 6 montf,s of age, is cu'ent on all of hershots, and is licensed and micro-chipped. She has become our,rhouse dog,, and has takento her new sulroundings quite nicely. She is even-tempered and very f;r;iy. Constantattention has mellowed her, although she still maintains a significant amount of puppyenergy.
Her interaction with other animals is one of friendliness and an overwhelming desire to
Pluy"'constantly. While she is obedient MOST of the time, she can be stubborn. She willbe attending her first obedience training after the first of the year.
I
{{
t *
I
Bartleby and Loki
Bartleby and Loki came to live with us in July of 2000. They were eleven weeks old at the
time. They were pafi of a litter of six; their mother was a mixed breed.
After a lengthy adoption interview, we were permitted to take the puppies in. We were both
aware of their "pit-type" Iineage (although they are mixed breeds) and kn.* that we could
afford them the opportunity to be raised with affection and kindness. In addition, we knew
that we had also eliminated the possibility of their being raised as fighting animals as we both
abhor the practice of fighting dogs.
Bartleby weighs approximately 115 lbs. (and yes, he is on a diet). Although his size isintimidating...he is a muscular dog...he is quite shy. In fact, he would rather run from
strangers than be required to even walk past them. For a dog so large, he is can be quite a
coward. And we love him for his never-ending goofiness. Bartleby has some trouble with
basic obedience; he isn't very bright and his enthusiasm can get the better of him.
In contrast, Loki weighs approximately 80 lbs. and loves everyone. She is very mild-
mannered and loves attention. She is our "alpha" dog, meaning she rules the roost when itcomes to our other dogs. She is very obedient and follows commands well. Her worst
transgression has been the eating of my futon.
Bartleby and Loki were spayed/neutered at six months of age, are current on all required
shots, and are both licensed and micro-chipped. Both Bartleby and Loki will be ,...irirgobedience training after the first of the year.
I
I
?,
'.
Peninsula Humane Society
i2 Airport Blr.d, San N{ateo, CA 9.1.101
(650) 340-8200 (650) 318_7891 FAX
Receipt Number: R01 -039212
Person lnformation: WILLIAM ROPER
1252 CAPUCHINO AV
BURLINGAIUE, CA 94010
Receipt Date: Saturday, September Zg,20A1
PID: P166874
Item Animal lD Reference No:Price: Each Amount:
LIC TRUST 3
LIC TRUST 3
LIC TRUST 3
LIC SN 3
LIC SN 3
LIC SN 3
4207686
p 07687
42O768B
A,207686
p.207687
4207688
101-D29876
LO1-D29877
LO1.D29878
101 -D29876
LO1-D29877
L01 -D29878
$3.00
3.00
3.00
27.0A
27.00
27.00
Total Fees Due:
Payments: Cash:
Check:
Credit Card:
1
1
1
"1
1
1
$3.00
3.00
3.00
27.O0
27.O0
27.00
$90.00
$0.00
$0.00
$90.00
Total Payments Receiv"a, ffi
Thank You!
Change: $0.00
Balance Due: $0.00
Animal lnformation
A207686 BARTLEBY - NEUTERED, PIT BULUBOXER, BL BRINDLE DOG
4207687 LOKI - SPAYED, PIT BULUBOXER, BL BRINDLE DOG
4207688 AZRAEL . SPAYED, RHOD RIDGEBACI(MIX, YELLOW DOG
License lnformatian:
Tag Number:Expires: Animal# Vacc Date:Term: Expires:Amount:Type:
D29876
D29877
D29878
D29876
D29877
D29878
09t01t04
09t01t04
09t0'U04
09t01t04
09/01t04
09t01t04
A207686
A,.07687
A207688
4207686
p2O7687
A207688
09t28t01
09128t01
09110t01
09t28t01
09t28t01
09t10t01
09128t04
09t28t04
09t10t04
09t28t04
09t28t04
09t10t04
$3.00
$3.00
$3.00
$27.00
$27.00
$27.00
LIC TRUST 3
LIC TRUST 3
LIC TRUST 3
LIC SN 3
LIC SN 3
LIC SN 3
36
36
36
36
JO
36
Total License Fees: $90.00
Shelter Hours
Monday - Friday 9:00AM - 6:00pM* Saturday 9:00AM _ 5:00pM*
Shelters CLOSED Sundays and Holidays
Transaction Date: 09/29/01 print Date: Ogt2gl}l)lerk: DGENSEL SHELTER
receipt.rpt ss 12100
BAYSHORE AI\IMAL HOSPTTAL
1.1.) \,,rri; \,;;11rlr1r,tl il,,ri!,.i.ir,i . l:irt \i:it-,,.r \.rllrri " rr,.rt ir ll--lr):j
October ?5,lOAL
To Whom It liAoy Concern:
'Loki" ond'Bortleby" Roper are oPProximotelyl5-month old mixed breed Puppies.
Bosed on oppeoroncethey ore presumed to be Pif Bull crosses. The Ropers brought
the puppies to Boyshore Animol Hospital on SePtember ?8, ?OOL, for vaccinotions
and general physicol examinotions. During their visit, both dogs were found to be
heolthy ond did not exhibit aggressive behavior towords PeoPle or other dogs.
f consulted with Mr. Roper regording the behovior of the dogs and the previous
oltercotion between "Loki" ond their third dog 'Az?ael". Mr. Roper reported that
the puppies ore now kept separoted from'Az?ael", he hos contocted an onimal
behaviorist ond plons to enroll the pups in troining closses.
The fomily seems to be toking o very reosonoble ond responsible opprooch to
prevent further problems between'Azrdel and 'Loki". Providing they follow
through with the obove plon, it is my opinion they con continue to mointoin o
comfortoble family structure with oll three dogs.
Sincerely,
-1
f,autt 12
Koren B. Conroy, D .,vl
Jes
E-nrail: tllnr@,balr,ispilal.r.onr . \\elrsite: rrrr n.bahospital.<.onr
BAYSHORE AI\IMAL HOSPITAL
:.i l \,,.1i!i \r;r1,i,i,'ti l:i,,rr1,',..rr',1 ' l.rn \iritr,'. {. \'jl.ltli * rrr.r{ii.i1: ;it:-
October 24,2041
To Whom It May Concern:
..Azrael" Roper is a l4-month old spayed female mixed breed dog (appears to be predominantly
Rhodesian Ridgeback) who presented to Bayshore Animal Hospital on September I l, 2000 with
multiple superficial bite wounds. The owner believed these wounds had been inflicted by the
other dogs in the household, and there was a previous history of injuries suspected to be bite
wounds on August 27 , 2AOO. The owner stated at the time of presentation that "Azrael" was
current on all vaccinations. Apart tom her wounds, "Anael" appeared healthy on physical
examination.
She was cooperative throughout her examination and tolerated mildly painful procedures (such
as the drawing of blood samples) without resistance. At no time during her stay in the hospital
did Azrael demonstrate any aggressive behavior towards people or other animals. Her bite
wounds were treated with surgical debridement and lavage, a drain was placed, and "Azrael" was
placed on oral antibiotics. Her wounds healed well with only minor complications (seroma
formation) at one site.
,,A7nael" was last seen at Bayshore Animal Hospital on September 25,2000. Based on this brief
contact with "Azrael," I do not believe she presents a risk ofdisease or injury to people or other
dogs. However, I have recommended that she and the other dogs in the household be separated
due to the risk to her ofadditional aggressive incidents and potential injury.
Sincerely,
fr ?;?t
'/x'Az t.ta. // " a
Brennen McKenzie, M.
jes
E-nrail: ,lr':l@ lialr,rslrilirl.r.orrr . \\i.lisrte: *wu.bah,rspilal.r.,rlrr
m
I arn u'nung this letter on belmlf of K1,le Matthe*'s and Bill Roper. Bill and I have been close friends for l5 r,ears
and I knorv him to be a responsible. honest and cornpassionate person. I also knou him to be a responsible pet
o\\,ner. Bill took excellent care of Spark-v and Friendo - nvo dogs he owned several vears ago - with regular visits to
the vet. the groomers and the dog park
Since they acquired their current pets (Bartleby. l,oki and Azreal), Bill and Kyle have likewise taken excellent care
of them. In fact, they even remodeled the backyard of their home in Long Beach to ensue that the three young dogs
had plenty of room to exercise. To my knowledge, none of their neighbors in Long Beach ever had any complaints
about the dogs or the way that Bill and Kyle treated them. My fiancde, Paula Robbe, and I took care of Azreal for a
week when they first rescued her and our impression of her is that she was a healthy and happy animal. Paula and I
spent a great deal of time at Bill and Kyle's Long Beach home, even house sitting and caring for their dogs and cats
on occasion. All of their pets seem friendly and well adjusted and they are definitely well maintained and loved.
I feel confident that Bill and Kyle can maintain their dogs as lovingly and responsibly in Burlingame as they did in
Long Beach. If there are any further questions on this subject, I encourage any interested parties to contact me.
Thank you.
Kurt Peterson
906 Molino Ave.
Long Beach CA 9080.1
{s62) 439 909e
kpbball@earthlink. net
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to echo Kurt's sentiments about they way Bill and Kyle treat their pets. I have known both of them for
about three years and in the time that they have had their three dogs, they have always struck me as both concemed
for the well-being of both their animals and also of anyone who comes in contact with them.
As a fellow pet owner (one dog and two cats), I pronounce them quality parents!
Thanks for listening
Paula Robbe
906 Molino Ave.
Long Beach CA 90804
(s62) 243 6938
prhealinghands@earthlink. net
.lason Rodgers
-lj-l East Third Streer
Long Beach Califbrnia
562-195-2029
To whom it may concern.
I have had the opportunily to house sit for Bill Roper on many occasions when he. his wife and
their three dogs lived in Long Beach. California. It u,as a pleasure to look after the dogs and I often spent a
lot of time playing rvith them in the backyard. While their size may be intimidating to some I found the
dogs quite manageable and playful. In fact the largest of them (the male) is the most playful and least
aggressive, sometimes bordering on shy around strangers. Judging a dog simply by its appearance and the
sound of its bark is seldom any indication of its disposition. Bill and Kyle are caring, attentive owners and
that love shows in their pets. I am not arvare of any incidents involving their dogs and anyone's person or
propefiy. I was present on tlte day they first received the dogs. and was closelv involved with them Lrp to
when they moved to the Bay Area. A dog is only dangerous in the hands of a bad owner. I rvas thrilled to
see these dogs go to such gentle and caring people. I would be surprised if these animals ever intentionally
injured anyone; short of believing they were lap dogs and crushing one's legs with their girth.
Jason Rodgers
12747 Oxnard Street
North Holl1,u,ood. Ca 91606
I Ruth Delgado have on many occasionstaken care of Kyle Matthervs' and Bill Ropers,dogs, Bartleby, Loki and Azrael , while Kyle and Bill aie out of the country on business.
Every single occasion with the dogs has been a highly enjoyable and playful one. AII dogsare extremely energetic and friendly. They are very well-bihaved and aie quick learners.
To Whom It May Concern:
said, it is understandable that their size and appearance may be intimidating to
ls definitely misconception.Specifically,Bart and Loki should not be helda
for the way they Iook therefore,their appearance should not be the decid lngcapacity to perform as wonderful and loving pets to their owners and friends.
YOU,
D,fu
Ruth Georgina Delgado
Woodbury University
RD
aaaaaaaaaaa.aaa
From:
Joe Morrissey
1167 Burrows
San Francisco, CA. 94134
(415) 334-0170
To Whom It May Concern:
I've known Bill and Kyle Roper for only a short time now, but I can say without a doubt
that they are care, concerned, and responsible individuals. They've always gone out of their way
to make us feel at home whenever we visit them. Their dogs are exactly the same way, always
caring and playful.
I was lucky enough to do-e sit for them a couple of months ago. Spending time with their
dogs was very enjoyable. Never once was I worried for my safety or for the safety of any other
people I had over while I was watching the pets. In fact, many times I found myself rolling
around on the ground playing with them.
Bill and Kyle have gone out of their way to make sure the dogs are well taken care of. I
have two dogs of my own and I hope that if I ever need someone to watch them, that they will be
available to do so. They care so much for these dogs that you would think they were their own
children.
Please allow them to keep the dogs. With the amount of care and consideration that the
Roper's have put into these dogs and protecting the neighbors, I can think of no good reason why
they shouldn't be able to stay together as a family.
Thanks you.
Sincerely,
Joe Morrissey
October 23,2001
Maya Marie Rodgers
To whom it may concem,
I am writing to you on behalf of three dogs, Bartleby, Loki, and Azraelthat wish to staytogether with their parents. It has come to my attention via the dogs' parents, Bill andKyle Roper that the dog's fate may be in jeopardy.
I have known the Ropers for a few years and I have known the dogs since they wereacquired. In fact, I meet them on their first day in their new home.lhe time I have spentwith all three of the dogs has led me to the conclusion that they are three of the sweetest
and well loved animals that I know of.
I have never been scratched, growled at, or even barked at by any ofthe dogs. They arenot dangerous and are not in any danger. The dogs are actuaily quite shy ani don,t evencome near you until they are comfortable.
Bill and Kyle Ropel,are very good parents to the dogs. They make sure that they arehoused; they eat well and have watir every day. I hive seen on numerous occasions thesigns of love and affection that only truly good pur.rrts can give. They play with theirdogs; give them hugs and kisses, and treati when they are good.
I hope this letter gives you some insight on the Ropers and their wonderful dogs. It wouldbe very sad if this family were broken up.
Very Truly Yours,
Stuart & Luz Venatrle
75210 Weeks Drive
La Miracla, CA 90638
(562) e02-e362
Wednesday, Octobe r 24, 200j.
Stuart &.LuzVenable
To Whom It May Concern:
we are sencling this letter_in regard to Bill Roper & Kyle Mathews, dogs. Bill hasinformed us that some of his neighbors ur" .o.r."rned because of the breed oftwo of their pets.
I would like to state that Bill & Kyle take the responsibility of their pets veryseriously' They h1y9 gone to great measures to ensure that their animals are wellsocialized and well behaved.
Having visited Bill & Kyle's resiclence in Long Beach and Burlingame, we have
f1a nulerous oPPortunities to interact with ihese animals, a.,dihey neverbehaved in anything b"!a friendly manner. The animals are neither threateningnor dangerous' In fact, the only danger in dealing with these animals is the slightchance of drowning in dog saliva.
I would strongly
-"-".oYlg" any governing body to consider whatever measuresare necessary to allow Bilr & Kyre to keep these animars together, as I trurybelieve they are not a nuisanceto the neighbors or the commtmity in general.
Thank you for your time,
October 29. l00l
Re: Petition of Bill Roper. K1'le N4attheu's. Barrlebl'. Loki. and Azrael
To Whom it May Concern:
I am writing this letter in support of the petition of Bill Roper and Kyle Matthews
to be allorved to keep a third dog. I am a co-worker of Bill and friends of both Bill and
his rvife. I have spent time over his house and interacted with his dogs. The-v are all great
dogs and Bill and Kyle take great care of them. Bill and Ky,le r,vould be heartbroken if
they were forced to lose one of their children.
In order to keep the dogs safe, they have taken steps to ensure that their backyard
is secure by putting in new fencing. They are also improving the dog run to be free from
odor with new rock and odor absorbing material. These kind of improvements are costly
and show what kind of committed and caring owners Bill and Kyle are.
Sincerely.
Kenneth Williarns
rllt /l
October'29. l00l
To Whom It Mrry Concem:
I am writing in reference to the situation faced by Bill Roper and Kyle Matthews. I have
known them for many years, and kno.w that they are responsible, courteous, and safe dog-
owners. They are very conscientious of their neighbors, and go to great.lengths to ensure
that their dogs pose no threat to anyone. They do this even though the dogs, in my
opinion, are not dangerous. They have company frequently at their house, and the dogs
are well socialized.
I am also a dog owner, and know that the character of the owners determines the
character of the dogs. Bill and Kyle are ideal in this respect, and well equipped to handle
their three lovable dogs. When good people have good dogs, the dogs become paft of the
family. Please allow this family to stay together.
Thanks,
Max Schaefer
Burlinganre cin council
My natne is Matt Cadwallader and I am writing this letter in sLrpport of Bill Roper
and Kyle Matthews as fit and able caretakers of their pets. I worked for Wildlife Fish and
Game in and around the Angeles National Forest and outlying suburbs to provided
assistance in animal rescue, physical rehabilitation, and quarantine services for wildlite
and stray or abandoned domestic animals. I have taken care of destructive, neglected or
dangerous animals in the past, and I can say with out any fear of contradiction that the
Roper's pets are fit, healthy and happy. They do not show dangerous destructive
tendencies or aggression, and are no danger to any property or community members.
The dogs are well cared for, well loved. and thoroughly happy and fit. Bill and Kyle love
these dogs and deserve to keep them in their horne.
Thank you,
Matt Cadwallader
13845 Friar St.
Van Nuys, CA
91404
(8r 8) 781-54i5
T o: 1urlinqame CiLy Council
Ke:The ordinance on the number of doqe allowed per family, and opecifically,thoee daqo
belonqinq lo one 1ill Roper
My name ie Srian Mansfield, and I am a friend of Mr. Ropere and have visited him a number of
timee. I am not, eure how many complainLe are needed ta reach the'numeroua comVlaints' the
city alleqedly received reqardin7 Mr. Ropero Veto, buf,l find that unusual. Hio peNo have alwaye
been f,he calmest, and moet, eubmiosive animale I have ever eeen and have only heard a bark come
oul of play, My 6ueee ie lheee complainto came from one or lwo opecific neiqhbore who, for oome
reaeon, juelflat ouL don'Nlikethese animale and are quickto complain. I am nol oayinqihey did
not make noisoe;in facl,they may have made some noioe oul of lonlinees forlheir family, or
perhapo l,hey cauqhl, a rat, or blrd in a f,ree and could nol ba quief,ed,, bul a'nuioance' io oomelhinq
I don'l see theoe animals ao being.
I think it would be a terrible to ehame to break up thio family, people and pete alike. Mr.
Ropero ?ef,o 1el, alonq quile well and it is obviouo lhey love their ownero, I would be dieappoinlinq
to aee thio city ordinance from 1941 enforced, ae it, not, only breako up a qreat family, but, I believe
il, to be out-dated ao well. Ao lonq as ?etrt are ?ro?erly cared for and not a bother,l believe Lhere
ahould be no limitfor a tamily, and action ehould only betaken if a Vroblem pereiete.
I ao eVeak ao an animal owner myoelf , and my two doqo became very noioy on Lhe laot ni1hl
of our firsL vacation away from Nhem, and yee, we did receive complainto for out neiqhbore. Since
then, we have remedied the eituation and they have nol,l,roubled our nei1hbore eince, even when we
are qone for an extended Veriod. I think a reaeonable solution aloo exiele for the RoVer family oo
f,hat hio nel7hboro will not be bolhered aqain, and a family can remaln to1ether.
Thankyou,
9rian Vansfield
I
Erecutive Summary of Petition Data
rn acrcritiou to the pages rlf sisnatures rve hAr,c- coilectecr. *e rra'e arso iuclude(l doc,rlrelrtati.' ..rl tltc
effbr-ts irvolr,ed in securingthese,anres. wrrir",hir,luto is brokerr clo*'u in a, easill reaclaLrle tort.at-
rr,e also felt it rvas i,.l-lporaur"t r" provicle a s,rlmar)'of rvhat these ttumbers fepresellt'
I' securing signatures form the rnajority of the resiclents rvithin 400 feet surrounding our horne' rve
found there rvere three basic r;-*pes orr..ia.n..sl Single Family Honres. Non-Secured Apartments and
Secttred APartments'
Single Family Homes are houses or noll-secured condominiurns where the residents/orvrers rvere
easily approached il;ir;";-of dwellings comprise approxirnately 27 percent of the residences
rvithin 400 feet of our property'
Non-secured Apartments are those where the reside.ts/owners were easily approacl,ed' These types
of dwellings comprise approximat ely 39i"t"tn'of the residences within 400 feet of our property'
Secured Apartments are apartments, condominiums or gated complexes where the residents/orvners
are not reaclily u.".r.iil". th"." urirai'g11"'';iiy l'*"\o .Soliciiing
signs posted' and all of thent
have locked entryways. It was extremiy aifficult for us to gain 'lgnitutit from these types of
residences ancl the extremely small amoiurt of signatures gairied *ui d,,. to the happenstance of
rneeting the occuparu, or,rii" of their residences.bnly u '*utl n:t':!tt"l-':::,t:d Aparlrnents had
managers located "rl.i*, "ra in two of the three cases' we were able to secLlre signatures fromthem
attesting to the r".i',t"i*" were denieo-entry as soricitation of their residents for any purpose was
strictly prohibited. irr.." ,vp.. or o*titing'"ton'tp'i'" approxi,rately 34 perce,t of the residettces
Hff'"T?"se tvpes of residences had .a number of vacancies'^:1^,:::.:'T;:'::f t' r'rs to gairr
signatnres, as there *"r" n" ,"ridents u,uiruUi"' Only when tlrese residences were confirmed as vacant
wlre they added to the petition dataas sr"[. ou..oncern in this area is that these residences could be
counted 65 "l'lo" roi"r'*f1"r, in fact, tf'"y tf.lot'fa not be counted towards the total number of
residences from *rr'il-h *" ur" required io obtain signatures. Additionally, there were several
residences where w" "outa
not obtain as the occupants were never ltome, although these residences
rvere visited nLlmerous tines. while we u'derstand that these also cou.t as ".o" votes, we feel it is
importa,t to note the distinction u"t*."I";;;;""iuutty sayi.g no and sorneorle.ot bei,g
uuuiluUf "
to consider or sign the petition'
Finally, when trre number of vacancies and Secured reside.ces are take'into acco'nt, two irnportant
pieces of data .*"rg".iir;, *: y."* uUi" ioobtain a majority of signatur-es.for the total amount of
residences regardles's oi accessibirity. s".i,.,a, gir., tt',. higlr p"r"entlage of signatures obtained from
Non-secure reside'ces it is reasonaur" to pro.i"7t that rrad ,i,e-been able to approac' these residences
we would have acquired an even ,r,or" ,r[rii,tial ,umtrer of sig.atures' Tlre results of this petition
demonstrate there is an overwhet,ring uni",i,rt'oiruppon within Iur neighborrrood for the granting of
within 400 feet of our ProPertY
this permit.
Should the city determine that we must gain signatures.from Secured Apartments in order to show an
even greater acceptance of our petition,-we "tt"'"q-"tiing
that the city irovide us with guidelines for
obtaini,g signatures rr"-irr"." ,vpes of *ria"r."'r',hat io not infringe upon the privacy and desire to
not be soricited exhibited by the owners. we would furtrrer request ai er.iension in trre time required
to gain these additional signatures'
Breakclown of Petition Data
Nunrtrer c'rlTotal Resiclences *ithin 400 t'eet of ottr pl'opeft\'
NutrrberofTotalVaca,.,tResidences(rron.votes)rr,itlrin.l00t.eetofottrpropert\
NunrberofTotalInhabitedResiderrcesrvithin400feetofourproperb"
N;;;.t of Total Signed Residences within 400 feet of our properrr"
ir.r"*g" of Resid-ences rvho signed this petition
Number of Secured Apartments rvithirt 400 feet of ottr property
Number of rotal N";:;;a)1,.,t,uuit.o Residences rvithin 400 feet of our propeft)" " "
PercentageofNon-secu,.allnt,uui..aResidenceswlrosignedtlrispetition
Number of Single Family Homes witlrin 400 feet of our properry
Number of Vaca.t Si'rlfe Family Homes rvithin 400 feet of our property""'
Number of Totat I"h;;:t;i ii"gi. Fali!l Homes rvithin 400 feet of our propeny"""""
Number of Total sig;;;;i""nu,r,ity Homes within 400 feet of ottr propefty"""" ""'
p.t."*g. of SinglE iamily-Homes who signed this petition
NurnberofNorr.SecuredApartmentswitlrin400feetofourpropefty
Number of vacant Non-Secured Apartments withirr 400 feet of our propefty
Number of Total r,rrr"iit.a Non-Secured Aparlments.y,lhi]r^100 feet of our property " '
Number of Total Si;;;N"r-Secu..d Aparlments within 400 feet of our property"""'
Percentage of Non-Secured Apartments who signed tlris petition
Number of Secured Apartrnents within 400 feet of our property
NurnberofVacantSecuredApartmentswithin400feetofourproperty
NumberofTotalt,,t..uuit.osecuredApartrnentswittrin400feetofourpropeffy
NumberofTotalSignedSecuredApaffmerrtswitlrin400feetofourpropefty
Percentage of Secur?d Apartrnents who signed this petition
.-t5l
... l-+
.339
.119
53%
.r20
219
82%
..138
,,..|2
..126
.. 107
85%
................... 1 20
......... Unknown
......... Uttknorvn
Not Applicable
...........'....None
rllt
q
o{
Not
LandoneaneneJ
M E B Carson.
AndersonChristinSchottBill
DuffieldAldoraine
Carson
Lafontaine
X
X
X
Avencoln28Li1
1200 Lincoln Ave
hino Ave.1206
X
Y
X
AvencolnLi2061
Ave.Lincoln1
Ave.1
1209
Ave121
Suzette Hamm
Reed
Ave.
1
1
x
X
X
121 Lincoln
0 Ave.
1213
Tlincoln Ave
13 Susan Lee
1216 C Ave.Joscher
Paloma Ave,l Elisa
Max
Deal
233
233
1
1
x
X
X,1
1
1 Paloma Ave.
Paloma Ave
Ave.
Paloma Ave.
Ave
Ave.
arl deQ deQuant
Manuel Gomez
Donna Gaul
Elisa
XAve.1
1240
lrene
L. Harris
Liu
1
244
1
1
1
X
X
Ave
Ave
Ave.
Ave
aloma
Ave.
X
1244
1248
1244
245
DebbieSambrailoJohn
Ben
Jeff
X
1
1
Ave.
Ave.
1
Ave.
Lisaohn
J
lrina Downton
Robert
1
X253
1256
X
1
1 Paloma Ave.
Ave.Linda Bickelman
Lianne Maroni
X
X
X
x
AvePaloma1
Ave.301 P
1305
1308 Laura L.
X1
Ave.
Ave
XAve.11
1 Paloma Ave.1
21
Suhair
C.B.
Tai
1 12
2 Lincoln Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
315
13'l
13 Ave.
9
Laura
Herberts Ambots
Sterner
Flood
Jessica
1
1320
Ave
Ave.
1321 xAve.
Ave
XAve321
Hall
ChartonJ
1
Ave.1
Ave.
X325
John
1329
Ave.ilottJotrnson, Gayle.
XAve.1
I 333
i
(l
(l
xl
-+l-
-+l-
XI
XI
--xr
xl
XI
-+F
xt
-+-
XI+-
XI
XI
xl
xl
XI
XI-+-
XI
XI
)
l\l
X
X
AveLincoln1425
Ave.1
k
no"
door
and I have to sa
nottdWottrdinance"othewith
Geraldine O'
wereI heard
',1
X
X 3?'what if hewe don't likehas a"Our
X too bad"
X
X don't want to nervous"memakeBullsPit
X
I have a
ona S
Hatesx Ilawnon around"morewant
X
't like
our
his wife
not
dogswiththeISSUEanhavenotdoestheUStoldtheyhavenotTheywillsign.andstzetheirofafraidis
- I have cats."
X
'1304
X
Ave.
AvenLincolI4Zt
1 Easton
I
Ave.Paloma1
'1256 c apuchino Ave
Ave1224
Ave.1228
Ave.aro
Ave1232
Ave1249
X
X1309 Lincoln Ave.
that too."have a law
our
whatdon'tallWEandjust11sinceSept.ordealersbedrugcould1dogthanmorehavewhoPeoplethink.canjustproblem,Iwhile yourunderstandandalibanTsYmPathizers
and1atapuchinowithcloseare beotwantnotdoalsoourtheywithdogs,issueanhavenotdo Theydispute.abe neighbortoconsiderwhattheYofmiddlethe
no intention of
&make
xl
71
1 15 Lincoln
Ave.
Lincoln Ave
X
ls
thewithstick theto
involvedbetowantdoesn'tandAnna
doornot
I can't
Does not
X
XPaloma
Ave.1328
1
1 X
X
X
Ave
Ave.
Ave1332
1404
1 XAve.1 X
Ave
Paloma731
Eubmittedlist
N ever came
dates and times can
needkthindon't"l
meetIhousetocometo
Ave.
214 C
1400
I
Ti2 Homes
Homes218'f1Ta 72 Total
1
i
XMA AVC2O7 Pa
X207Ave
X207 Paloma Ave
Matt
natureXPaloma Ave.
X1PalomaAve.
X1PalomaAve. #6
Can't
Alexx#81
X1Ave. #1
xT26'sGpuchino Ave. #2 DorrxAve. #1121
X1 SilvaxAve. #3121 xAve. #4121 xAve. #5121
X#6 MoriokaAT?apfhino Ave. #1 Lum
121 Ave.
X1217Ave
X217Ave
XAve.7
X7 Paloma Ave.Stevex#21
X#3I
X121Ave.
X217Ave.
ur
ulie
Ellis
XAve.
XAve.
XAve.1
X#1I ToroX#41
WaltonX122#A
X1221#B Kellet
1221 Ave.
X1221Ave.
1224 #2
X224
X#5
JuliannaP
Casas
X#6
xAve.
X
X1
X
HectorXAve.225
XEI NicoleXEl Ca
XReal1EI
Xno1 Navarrox#61
x1229#4 TanakaxAve. #6 Davex#1 Tx
D.X
XEI
XEI Bill Sullivan
XAve. #1 c^+txAve.M)236 lreneX1JenXlEoErcamlno Real #4
Xl23o frcamino Real #5
X#61
I
LVNN lJIIIOTU
Sharla Galle
RoberX#21Camino lani238 El camrno Real#3
Xt2gsEiEmino ReaI4-
idg capuchino AY9.4l-
X
Ave.chi KeX1244
i
i
t
Iti
i
$
$
I.j
-
Ii i , lyes
-il-
rt
Jenxl--xT-bannielle E
ealCamino1244
1244
X#249
ino
Xhino249
X#3249
X#4
X#1EI
H
Gomezx#2Camino
1 EI X n
JawnX
I
R
1
1
1 x
1
I
1
XI+
N
Laura Vida
owatt#2
Camino Real
Camino Real
'1308
I
1
eanxREI
#1
#3
TSTtEiGmF@1-
lmEicamfioFee!il-
Real #11316 El Camino Sin
Ciaran
eal
320 #4
#5
n Ave.X
XAve.1
nPatrick
Dunn
XAveI
X#6
1
121 -'t dont like
"l'm
siqn
220
a bad
am
like
to
of Pit
X
fc1 she would for
Ave.1 free" -dooreven"l want
Ave1 door for
x
x
#3
X
#6
X
X17
XAve. #B
X1
#1EI
REI X
1
& meet
can't
no.'
come to
iome to the
X226x
X
x
Ave
121
6
#4
1
Ave.M
ntuttipte ettemPlC-#2
canlist
7122
Name / NotesNot Home'VacantNoMaYesAddress Secure Entrance
1475 Lincoln Ave #1 Secure Entrance
1475 Lincoln Ave #2 Secure Entrance
n e #3ncoL451 Secure Entrance'1475 Linco!n Ave #4 Secure Entrance
1475 Lincoln Ave Secute Entrance
1475 Lincoln Ave #6 Secure Entrance
nI e #774Lin5co1 Secure Entranc€
'1475 Lincoln Ave. #8 Secure Entrance
1475 Lincoln Ave #9 Secure Entrance
0#1I14L5coln1 Secure Entrance
1#VEnLicol150 Secure Entrance
VC #2iLlnnco4501 SecuIe Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave. #3 ecure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave #4 Secure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave #5 Secure Entrance
e #61nLco4501 Secure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave. #7 Secure Entrance
8#VCILlnnco4501 Secure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave. #9 Secure Entrance
01ve#nLi ncol4510 Secure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave. #11 Secure Entrance
21#velnLnco4501 Se cure Enttance
1*3lnLncol4501 Secure Entrance'1450 Lincoln Ave. #14 ecure EntranceI#5lnve504ILncoI Secure Entrance
6#1iLlnnco450I Secure Entrance
1#7vetnLncol45I0 Secure Entrance
1450 Lincoln Ave #18 Secure Entrance
9#1velnL50ncoi4I Secure Entrance
#20incolnL4510 Secure Entrance
a i1CamRerno2461E Secure Entlance#2IReainoE46cIam21 Secure Entrance#3aloReniEmlCa2416 Secure Entrance
Ia #4IrnomRe2461E Secure Entrance#5ReainoIEamC2461 Secure EntranceReao#6cIamn21E46 Secure Entrance
1246 El Camino Real#7 Secure Entrance#8ainoReIEmCa246,1
Secure Entrance
IRea #9CIlnamo2461E Secure Entrance#I 01oinReaE46CamI21 Secure Entrance
1#1ReoalCamnEI2461 Secure Entrance2#1RealInom2461CaEI Secure Entrance#1IReainoEamC2134 SecureEntrance#2IReaoEICamn2134 Secure Entrance
alRe #3Camino234'1 E Secure Entrance#4CRealInom2,1 EI34 Secu re Entrance
i234 Elcamino Real #5 Secure Entrance#6nIIReaoIECam2341 Secure EntrancqalRe#7E1noml2341 Secure Entrance
1234 El Camino Real#8 ecure Entrance#9olnReaIEamc21 Secure EntranceI#0CamRealno2341EI Secure Entrance
1#1alnoReCaEImi2134 Secure Entrance2#1IrnoReaIEaCm2134 ecure Entrance
IRea 3*1IEtnoCam2341 Se cure Entrance#I 41niReao2341IECam Secure Entrance
1#5nomtalReCaEI2341 Secure Entrancel1I6inomReacEIa21ecure Entrance7#1otnIReaEamc2341 ecure Entrance#I I1nIReaoEmCa2341 Secure Entrance
1#I Reno alUAEI1 Secure Entrance#20IRearnoECam2134 Secure Entrance#1IRearnoIEamC220I ecure Entrance#2IImReanoIE2201 Secure Entrance
1220 El Camino Re al #3 Secure Entranceino Real #41220 El Secure Entranceino Real#51220 El Secure Entrance
n Reao #6IEamc2201 ecure Entrance
n Rea #7IEacmo2201
I
II
-
(Secure Entrance)1220 El Camino Real #8
1220 El Camino Real #9
Secure Entrance1220 El Cam no Real #10
Secure Entrance1220 El Camino Real#11
SecLJre EntranceT220 El Camino Real #12
Secure Entrance)1220 El Camino Real #13
(Secure Entrance)'1220 El Camino Real#14
Secure Enkance1220 El Camino Real #15
Secure Entrance1216 ElCamino Real #1
(Secure Entrance)1216 ElCamino Real#2
(Secure Entrance)1216 El Camino Real#3
(Secure Entrance)1216 El Camino Real#4
(Secure Enkance)i 212 El Camino Real#1
(Secure Entrance)1212 El Camino Real #2
(Secure Enkance)1212 ElCamino Real#3
(Secure Entrance)'1212 ElCamino Real #4
(Secure Enlrance)'1277 El Camino Real#1
(Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real#2
(Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real#3
(Secure Entrance)'1277 El Camino Real #4
(Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real #5
(Secure Entrance)1277 ElCamino Real #6
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #1
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #2
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #3
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #4
(Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #5
(Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #6
(Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #7
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #8
(Secure Entrance)'1500 Sherman #9
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #10
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #11
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #12
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #'13
(Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #14
(Secure Entrance)1500 She.man #15
(Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #16
(Secure Entrance)'1500 Sherman #17
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #1 I
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #19
(Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #20
(Secure Enkance)1219 Paloma Ave. #1
(Secure Enkance)12'19 Paloma Ave. #2
(Secure Enkance)1219 Paloma AVd. #3
(Secure Entrance)1219 Paloma Ave. #4
(Secure Enkance)1220 Paloma Ave. #2
(Secure Entrance)1220 Paloma Ave. #3
(Secure Entrance)1217 Capuchino Ave. #2
(Secure Entrance)1217 Capuchino Ave. #3
(Secure Entrance)'1217 Capuchino Ave. ,l4
'120 Total Secured ResidencesTOTALS
40 Total Residences with Manager Signature Denying Admittance
60 Total Residences with No Manager in Residence
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIII
IIII
IIIIIIII
IIIIII
(Secure Entrance)
tr
tTl
It-
T-T----TTTT-I
rT-T
T-t
T-TT-Tt
I
IIttlt--T__]
-
Ltl
---r-
't;!
PErtuoN FCP Cirv FrRl,ttr
City of Burlingatne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on uny premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male or female of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be granted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their private property and within their home.
./'/
hqo d €thryoq _lzfl az/k/,;, 4!-
Signature mme (pnnted)Address
4
s/'4"frn /L7{ clf<thfr,?/d
Sigruture
Signature
Signature
Name (printed)
b?ail c G re41
Name (printeti)
Nanre (pnnteiit
48 (r+qulftuO AUq
Address
Address
Address
Dan 5k u n,"l7Y { Qrrlrt^ #Ll
Name (printed)Address
.bk-er.L'rt "\vrS Kn*/aY7 q",j,*9)l\o
Signature
Name (printed)Address
l75t
Address
Address
K)ozr,;, V\uror.z+>nD+
Narne (printed)
Druig t Po{k<rt, ;tx'ItZc' Ca1-,,7-/,,r.,o, * 4
Name (printed)Address
).r-t,n \rvr"Yrr \{1,0 u It4I
Name (printed)Address
t #t
L;ro Ve,A*+Aet-
Name (printed)
I
fio-da-L.&r.r; I ) \ tl Cal.,tr hrnp
Nr"r" tpri.t"dl Address I
-r
PprtuoN FoR CtrY Ppnutr
City of Btrrlingarne
under the pro'isions of ordinance g.04.060 the city council may grant a permr^t for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "itr,.. male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideirt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the aautt residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
on their private ProPertY and within their home
Signature Name (printed)Address
lt_e.\ V"€u; i Ia-L-A h.o A v<
Name (printed)Address
.+
Address
u\\1-;LZ \_B <1
Narne (printed)
alne
Name
AddressSignature
fc--
Address
Address
+l
G[^^ U"[r/"()e( cAluct'$tlo/Are ,(
Name (printed)Address
,\tt
\r rt
Address
3t{
Address
*\a,c cr/r I
$jgnature Name (printed)
d 11
ame (printed)
b
Signature Name (printed)
frit gDT,5
ruc
gc.iEe Fu >1",.
1
I
I
!
t
I
I
l
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv PPnHatr
City of Burlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
rnonths and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their private property and within their home.
UVu IY t AAed Cft t/)n<..PY A
Name
,)o/{ n,/*
Address
Y t nTos t Jls
Address
,./os /3 zS
Address
Address
Z
Address
Signatue
Signature
Signature
Name (printed)
Narne (printed)
a), rl\a 4r/.-
_/
-_\s h-so I 33 ? c,..*-rl-o,4-
Name (printed)l*c b*ort 4--
Name (printed)
\
-F*5 \,J"Ut 's2l G J"\ \-us R
Name (printed)Address
J h 6
Name (printed)
T)"rylWiLru lTh l)ncdn Nz*eiNa*ltp'i"GAt Address
(printed)
(
..-/tzr2-Pe
(printed)Address
lon* ks
Address
'::i
PErtuoN FoR Ctrv Penutr
City of Bttrlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adutt reiidents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned,as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
on their pri property and within their home.
(printed)Address
.., I L /z+07,/*,o 4rulzttt*
Narne (printed)
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Address
? /c /rr"*'a &n
Address
lrr\263?h/trvlk t'<nt'
I l*'/
t
Address
(L(1 LoA,4 ft"€
Name (printed)Address
/KErci KEnf/tzy'o Cnfuclr */r
Name (printed)Address
'T,i-5.,*,ftob Ca?uc*rrw ,{UZ,
Name (printed)
(printed)
Address
Chlrbro
Signature
L
Address
Address
)l
tla-14rr','Gb*y* /ao5 "]r,
n 4r:a
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
d,0 ?(
\r>c
Name (printed)
,J
Address
s {+
L INDA OIC)QL^J*NL
.z/
/JD b (aqt 'na flYa'
Address /
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Ppnnatr
City of Bttrlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .itt.t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a reside-nt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
four hundred feet ofthe boundary lines ofthe residence
of their desire and intention to keep more than two
Lr
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within
ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance
dogs ontheir private property and within their home'
I
Name Address
_f4;^#g
d(a
Name (printed)Address
TnwftRn-r FDUbr v 15 cRnf,ulf\c AVr # 4
Name (printed)AddressSigrature
Signature
S,\r^.a.
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
lztS y',t"43
Address
>)9
AddressSignature
{u^:,lc- TawoV,,-t >L! CAPuCtl t lto fi)e46
Address
EETrr fr trflL/Az=ofrhcfuntD fuf{ =Name (printed)
0Y So t;
Name (printed)Address
tqn
d-tP
3 C*r A uf5
Address
$ . l,\orrh €,\
AddressName (printed)
DIV ID (, 6ERVfr5I ) Lfi(ocH tuo (*3)lL,l
Name (printed)Address
0\rir LoLz l).q\
Signature Name (printed)Address
tt-turhino tr,
\z
i
:
i
I
i
i
II
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Penlatr
City of Burlingame
under the provisions of ordinance g.04.060 the city councir may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .iit "t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideit presents a-verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as
ofthe applicant, grant
on their
adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
within their home.
Address
ss
L
i\Iii
Name +5,"*C \is t^ $*1 L
C7/?,'
Signture
Sigrature
Name (printed)Address
As 1" lJtc-t" 36 ?"9.-r*-- *w4-
Name (printed)Address
Ll,tsk 0 D A I nil)pnrna ,+tt'{lLv b
Name (printed)Address
73{Po/r^a 4yt
(printed)Address
Narne
Jbftr\) &L rtNC 33 (/n/a hfc-
Name (printed)Address 'boQL ,k 7+o ro
tlD
Address
tu
ly t7/+ 7 UqTffi /3/J qr,".-L"/4re..
Name (printed)Address
l4of
(printed)
4 [, tt-
Address
L r\ C()"\A^.{ )
c
t .1
I
t
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pr,nvtr
City of Btrrlingatne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, iittt"t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. rhis permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
-
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant ouiunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their private property and within their home'
A IRA NO I3&.q Pn uor't { xv<- .
Name
Name
Address
-V Jr / ?)b PJ,
AddressSignature
L-a.-,-l.zr. Ar/h 13 )a P.-t"-n '*-
Name (printed)Address
/)
/,/""'E, Lr.*n, 6<tn* n/t1/A /o/n.u
Name (printed)AddressSignature
\rJrecrN\ A McGr,, WAN \3'b6 Lr nca(n'
Name (printed)Address
w,tl{tru /, nr-I 3o( L/rn?
Name (printed)AddressSiguture
tW,,t-'Na Lt'tI)nt-l3rt
Name (printed)Address
Cfi lF ()2 / o4{
Name (printed)
Name
Name (printed)
Address
lu,u6w^r)tsrtr"f Nex{osc\<r lZz+ (atr,^* - /Wc-
Address
\?\
I),tD 8.6N1,o L
s'ffi-----V
Name (printed)
c-
Address
\*^',-
r
I
.S
PprtrloN FoR Ctrv Ppnutr
City of Burlingame
under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, ii*"r male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideirt presents a verified petition containing bona fide
^
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
and within their home
)J'"r ("^!<A.,\o L4 ct ^/.k 2-_-t-P
Name (printed)Address
Name (printed)Address
we
of
0r,,, Li,^= .l?<+" L " q,r *-a k<
Name tprintea) Address )
vLU/"4 ftvel.Lt/4
(printed)Address
J 4rrrrt-/.*r,tUorv l/rt (tuoo"lJ ,{rt
Narne (printed)
Name
Name
Name
Name
Address
lry n se 1 //
Address
o\elL.taY
6 (/
')^fu)z--a (
AddressSignature
I\Z'^) LbLN A(TLr
Address
pirL J"ful.t Lt 2r Vi"tcJ* lut
Signature
(printed)Address
Name (printed)Address
i\e bhe S *baa,,lo
\
i
I
PprtuoN FoR CtrY PPnHatr
City of Burlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents awerified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority ortne adutt reiidents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grunt oriunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their private property and within their home'
Signature
Sigrature
Signature
Name
lni \^-e g 7l,t)
^Narne (printed)
Name
Name
&,nncP.-
Address
a,(*23-C,A--
&u^dorr.,^. D.rI[,u\.\?-i)t U,yr\.,c\r'\ AVqn 0<-.-AI
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Name
Name
AddressSigrature
Signature
t2D 1 l*i t\",I t/1 fl)e
I .)
Address
/u't9z-l 1fr,>nr{
Address
\f- G*p*lZl6 /-;.,/n ,4*
Name (printed)
14ao (**,=. J
Name
/Je6 /t .'t Oo /n /r*
Address
Address
C ll-La
Sigrature
Name (printed)Address
Ptrcou*
[-e
A-*'-'
PprtuoN FoR CtrY PEnvtr
City of Btrrlingarne
under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "ittr.r
male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. this permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant ou;nderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on iheir private property and within their home'
n*A A Fto "rqAddress
-
-()
Name (printed)
ks
(printed)
Narne (printed)
Name (printed)
Address
Strrp- lzgb Aevl'h N€
(^d 4g-lvuq1
t4l C{.."-h-
Address
Address
Ar.4/-
vu4 S IZIL
c C 1e\.il '3r;l* t
Name (printed)
Name
p-ts
Name (printed)
Address
Address
Address
-(z- 15-
Address
a,tliltk/u
O^,^ot2% (
(no
- 1-(-VL}
Signature
-+
Name (printed)
6,1,,)q,lilcz I Z,
q nc-h^n-
Address
a
Address
0
Name (printed)
n
Name (printed)
/l
0 (J^r +
't
I
U"^col* d,*,
PrrtuoN FoR Ctrv Pnnvtr
City of Btrrlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04 060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
,ijrutr... of a majority of the adutt residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned,as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their Private ProPertY and within their home Ly
(t22t Pa(.o*a-b"r( .
Name
Name (printed)
Address
/Z
Address
?rla6e5rtca-I
t/ O { Lt' na I ntlv U e- 6 4 qA-/--
Name (printed)AddressSignature
Name (printed)
/
Lt7 oi(
9-r
-7Jt teTfe v/LL /tP/tL*/
Name (printed)
LE
Name
Address
t*f-l,z1 ?il-,rn*{{
9Gt/g
Address
Address
Address
a *#rJat ?
&
Name
'zll5 0zo l,
Name (printed)
S'.o-i et\'s /720
Name (printed)Address
folo-o +1
&le-
I
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pgnnatr
Citv of Burlingame
Under the provisions of ordinance g.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .itt.r male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide
signatures oru .u.loriif of the adutt residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore,we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and accePtance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their property and within their home.
Name
(printed)
Name (printed)
Crz /t'rs /a,^1
Name (printed)
{o
Address
zt5
Address
Address
/>t7
Address
t7 lI^
Address
lzzr
Address
Address
e
+
^-u
e_-
#/
it
Signature
Signature
Name
Name
4z-
#
r1A_
tut kln
Name (printed)
ame
Name (printed)
,(
Name (printed)
/il4rry-
LJ o tJt-
Address
Address
) /?D7
AddressSigtature
Signature Name (printed)Address
llNCo IJJ AVE
(
C,ttssa Ketterl-l-
k*lctl+an{us BS4taGlur.r$ qus #5
i
PprtuoN FoR CtrY Pgnxnr
City of Bttrlingame
under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a reside]nt presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
ofthe app licant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their private property and within their home.
0@e sffi *l(-/r lzo++
Name (printed)Address
t
Name Address
Name (printed)
\'i r-r-:f \Ni . 1 +1 -tr?tB)_+<
Name (printed)
J,l,Yl
Name (printed)
Address
77aa Cn p uC ,ft(
Address
/2 C7 QALouu,{ d8u
Name Address
/-wils (2 /7 f t rot'tt- irk *
Name (printed)Address
,9u,J', il*I 4?#
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Address
Address
DA TEfr4
Name (printed)
rlst/
Address
lzt Fl (,rn t41Ll
L
..:,
PnrtuoN FoR CtrY Penvtr
City of Bttrlingarne
under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant ouiunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs ontheir private property and within their home'
A 4{^?-tA
Name
AddressSignature
(ffi,^,ro)futtr (rt ,b\ft $tq-'b-trtt
(printed)Address
Address
Address
E{
M 0a-/*(* lu(, {l C4^4
Name (printed)
Ly nn G{o'J )4bLl Ca*rltb,+U
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Address
\)37 +q€t Cam\no
Address
\qn Q,nSSuvWn 1238 Dl (Av^r^o #z
Name (printed)Address
{[*th R#*/ ( pa^l-r--- O?ao e( Cql^i- # 7
Name (printed)Address
\g+fiU,f* 6 M/r1rJr.[s
tr:L
Address
YL* ?v cl"<\\b ?z;a-Jk.l
h 6L
Name (printed)
Address
/ b?{
Name
Address
Ga.',*c Aua\rn
Name (printetl)
\ela\\G*,.,"&5
6rr'cc [.Je\int^'
Signature
PprluoN FoR Ctrv Ppnxrtr
City of Burlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male or female of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be granted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
and within their home.
/Lltl.,- t/i,^J,*-lan -A-*#3
Sigratue Name (printed)Address
dogs on their pgivate property
vd,P-
lagZCq,<Atrr: AQ
Name (printed)Address
Address
drru 77,*-4*.4.fr*<@
-Y.n Z,aWrt Dqq ?9 (Anq, Wrl-O %
Name (printed)
(printed)
Address
QN k-n_(u7L c LLftru i,uo ("/.( 4
(printed)Address
(.
l-wGiv (rA?s*
Signature
q-c)
Sigrature
o
laL €! %E &44tK
Address
lUX, fl (@rv ft-2r.ql ft$
Address
tLSo Er CA*t,*o &r. €L
Name (printed)Address
Mlu 4/v< tw/h {t Nvs tL?o fl Gfi,r,trw
Signature
h
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Ch,n.u-rut
Address
Address
r'()
Signature Name (printed)
4/-cy-I
Address
Dt
Ar nd Z,^l
I
0^)
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv PEnvttr
City of Burlingarne
under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adutt residents within four hundred fbet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
property and within theiron
\.s,=sq S
Name (printed)
tia3 t U)'14 A^,€ . {tr +
Address
rt,€ilDdlfr l?-o-7 Pel.-.,'tt * L
4-/
/-
Ur,rt,,te-l{en fr<l)aL e [ (dor,*ou I &,e
Address
Address
Address
lz7r.€( Ca,nino {Ze^!+z-
Address
//
Address
,\r\
ll
Address
Name (printed)
o
(printed)Address
9 tA Frxr2p 1241 LL- C+.,-<* P<4- +'--t
Name (printed)Address
I ?)/ fu[41b'r',',( 4
\?1.1 ta{ ,tc,0,ln tk'tu ,^
Signature
u
(printed)
Tnnnu e
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
Lelqn4
^et\ ;
I
V"lt /23o tlC.xn'tdflc)
Signature
(__
Address
Req I
Name (printed)
Name (printed) '
PErtuoN FoR CtrY PEnHatr
City of Burlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have' keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "itt ". male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. this permit may be gianted when a reside-nt presents a verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within lour hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant.
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant,our understanding and acceptance oftheir desire and to keep more than two
dogs on their property and their home.
t&-a_(Nni."-,,l
Name (printed)
T lr0f-t/- G,u^/ ^)b
#5
irlentiony2
Name (printed)Address
+-*r/;} N,krttznD)A t>6e gt Cx-rr/Xa t /
Name (printed)Address
€i teer-, ?,//6 5 il &nur#{
Name
Name
Address
Address
Z
Vur E,w-*,I L71 {/ frtrr,n o FZ
Name (printed)
Name (printed)
.Ga
Name (printed)
Address
l?538t MlND {rr /
Address
/3/2 EL CA /Ylt U 0 fLE At-'
Address
Address
Address
#L
r-
Sigmture
I X4
Name (printed)
Name
Ub euUou<rx:o Wnd\-I
Sigrature Name (printed)
@r6
0et
Address
tTt2 €/ A-n;nr' (a-C #3
PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pgnmr
City of Btrrlingarne
Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or
maintain on any premises within ttre city, more than two dogs, "iin"r
mafe orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents averifred petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant
four hundred feet ofthe boundary lines ofthe residence
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within
ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance
dogs on their private property and within their home'
of their desire and intention to keep more than two
/3 n fu C'<*rt^*'*t ELT
kzl.JUG +-*"4 a 8q.
L
(printed)
faill u(1
Address
I 5to
flk)o K-G4 ^)t>^r[ J.
Address
L3Lo Z\ Cr.'ai$o
L
Address
Address
Ra"l :# \
EL Ct--m,i o (A-L* 3 '
(
/
Sigtature Name
Narne (printed)
(printed)
Name (printed)
Name
/).l-'tot ol Qlora
Address 131 L C < rnlqoOt/'
Signature
&"rA ylLe tr^ ffha ) a
(>
Tn
Address (--/C*n,t/dl-
L C*Pd
e e,4,
d h.^,no *t
gf$Te EuQLt 9rvt acTq rydd
P,4
at/f ol a)
ll ri .trl
Name (printed)
(printed)Address
Name (printed)Address
u>h UEA, J.tba €
Address
Address 3*l ,n7 tt,rr14--
,t
/s
#(
Name (printed)
(2Odta Bi
Signature Name @rinted)
VrA,a-
Address
€/ne #-
/
€t Ar- /
PnrtrloN FoR CtrY PEnHalr
City of Burlingame
Underthe provisions of ordinance 9.04.060the city council may grant a permit for a persouto have, keep or
maintain on any premises within the city, more than trvo dogs, .itrr". male orfemale of the accepted age of nine
months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residJnt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide
signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of
the applicant
Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence
of the applicant, grant our understanding and accePtance of their desire and intention to keep more than two
dogs on their Private ProPeftY and within home.
Y^fu I?85 E{Gnno
Name (printed)AddressSignature
er/O//,-e 2-z;t t-/ G*.,, {oo / o'
Name
Narne (printed)
N u,'
Narne (printed)
.A-rr
(printed)
J,q
(printed)
).r.r f eUV,
Name
Name (printed)
l--
Name
lZrT El (e.*a u'".^
Address
$wre
Address
Address
Address
e la C
Vk/L*"4 /?68 ?* Cz*-:---^ /-J
Address
\{'
a.
tt(( Lc..- 6s.4,u. a.C-
Address
7u" Bo tca otr /3 n-s/c** k-L#;
Address n.'uLuESS
kV"'h^. /+*tTSz E@€
Address
Signature Name (printed)
<t =ctl S
Address
Ur"!.r*-
u^"
^ ^e(Z^ , */ta_(*l
As manager of this comprex I am refusing Mr. Roper acce"ss to *]- ]:i:",, while I understand trrat he is seeking signatures for a
petition in regards to clti' ordlnance g.O+."OOO. r'l'e do not allorv our residents to be solicited for an* reason'
yA-
t
As this comPlex
i,
h-l;''ud'Lir^i
I am refusing Mr. RoPer access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a
city ordinance 9.04.060.allow our residents to be soticited for any reason'
S4 7J t-rltre/_-
(printed)Address
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a
p",iii"-i *grOr,o .i6;;Ji"** 9.04."060, *" io not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Name (printed)Address
Signature
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr Roper access to my tenants. while I understand tlEt he is seeking signatures for a
petition in regards to cit| ordinance S.O+300, *. do t ot allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Name (printed)Address
Signature
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my teilmts. while I understand that he is seeking signat[res for a
;ti,|o[fi regards to cit| ordinance 9.0+.-ooo, *. do rot allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Address
Signature
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a
pliiii". ti r.gards to cit| oroinance 9.0+.-060, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Name (printed)AddressSignahre
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a
Gitr"" i; regards to cit! ordinance S.0+.-000, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Name (printed)AddressSignature
As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand tllat he is seeking signahrres for a
;;titi"" ii regards to city ordinance 9.O+.OOO, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason'
Signature Name (printed)Address
,:V ' -\ ir'i;\, . i: \,r1 1
:-T.,,\'
'Name (Prirtted)
Name (printed)
)
Z-- L15' trEl'YE , lhc* 3tarr&s >
UJ
,
Lll(J
.C
\
x
E
LL
5
fi
l.+
o
E
+
s
,E
r-
)
6lCK{ato (r{nr r, *erz\.1u"1'
4.d -rtrrce
b
(
\$u2
'H\LDue{)
li Loaa s*k,
I
u'ftilcL
\^ " L)3e.nrot A
t
:r-
=
\r1
a
T
trAb.rl( tl*tD 6lor* uu,^e\.
fut 0
C.APUCHIND XTJT.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
AGENDA 8aITEM#
MTG.
DATE 1.07.02
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SI]BMITTED
DATE:31.2001
APPROYED
FROM:CITY PLANNER
srrBIEcr:REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2001.-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR COMPLIANCE REVIEW
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should review the proposed Draft of the 2001-2006 Housing Element (attached). Since this
meeting has been widely advertised, there may be members of the public in attendance who wish to speak.
Council may open the study item to comment from the floor. Staffwill be prepared to make a brief
presentation on the content of the Draft element if Council wishes. Following discussion, Council should
direct staff:
1. On any items in the report which should be modified or changed;
2. Determine if the document, with any proposed revisions, is ready to be forwarded to the California
Department of Housing and Community Development for their review and comment.
Planning Commission Action:
At a special meeting on December 19, z}Ol,the Planning Commission held a study session to review the
Draft 2001 -2006 Housing Element. (PC Minutes December 19, 2001) At the meeting the Commissioners
commented on the draft element as did a number of members of the public. About 30 members of the public
were present at the meeting. At the conclusion of the meeting the Commission directed staffto forward the
draft to the council for review and to make the following revisions to the Housing Element action program.
r Add a provision in the element to encourage public agency partnerships to provide affordable
housing for employee groups such as teachers, hospital workers, city employees;
o Add a policy to encourage the development of live-work units in the area south of Burlingame
Avenue;
o Develop zoning code changes to encourage opportunities and incentives for construction of
live/work units and mixed use (commercial/residential) projects;
o When extending the Second Unit Amnesty program, consider expanding the program by
moving forward the eligibility date for exiting second units to qualify;
o Clarify in the Housing Element that there is very liule undeveloped land in Burlingame for new
housing development, that in Burlingame additional housing will be the result of reuse of land
already developed in some other use or in less efficient residential development,
o Add a section to the report which documents the time, effort and money spent to develop this
draft ofthe Housing Element; and
BY
BY
,
REWEW OF THE DRAFT 2001-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT PRIOR TO SABMITTAL TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNA
FOR COMPLIANCE REWEW January 7' 2002
o Encourage in the work program the use of private foundation grants to assist in funding
affordable housing in Burlingame.
These changes have been incorporated into the Draft Housing Element attached dated December 27,2001
The changes are shown in italics and are found on the following pages:
Policy and implementation for housing for teaches, hospital workers, public employees: Pages H-
64,H-68 andH-76;
Implementation programs for live-work units and mixed use zoning: Pages H-53, H-56, H-72 and
H-78;
Expansion of Second Unit Amnesty Program: Pages H-72 and H-78;
Documentation of the time, effort and money spent developing the document: Page H-7
The need to extend design review to multiple family residential development was also discussed by the
Commission. It was determined during the discussion that this program would be considered as apart of the
needed revisions to the R-3 and R-4 (multiple family residential zoning districts) which will be considered at
the Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting in February 2002.
BACKGROUND:
Staffbegan preparing the Draft 2001-2006 Housing Element, one of the seven required elements ofthe city's
General Plan, in the Spring of 2001. While it was decided to do the research, civic engagement, and writing
portions of the element in-house; the city did employ the services of a consultant to assist us in interpreting the
state mandate and to assist staffin negotiations with HCD if any are required. Public involvement is a critical
component of preparing a Housing Element. The city has held two widely publicized workshops to which
residents, agencies providing public and housing assistance, and Council and commission have been invited.
The Planning Commission also held a public forum type study session at which interested members of the
public and housing providing agencies discussed the proposed element. With Council review the document
will be ready for submittal to HCD as the statement of the City's housing action program for the next five
years. Subsequent to HCD review the city will go through the General Plan amendment process which also
involves hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Attached to the staffreport is a copy of the Executive Summary for the 2001- 2006 Housing Element. This
can be used as a guide for your review of the contents ofthe attached draft report The key sections ofthe
draft element not previously reviewed by the Council are the Site Selection Section and the Action Program in
the Goals, Policies and Action Program Section. Of particular importance is the action program which defines
in program and with quantified housing unit and program accomplishment targets the city's approach to
addressing its regional fair share and community housing needs in the coming 5 years.
ATTACIIMENTS:
Planning Commission Minutes, December 19, 2001
Executive Summary of the draft 2001-2006 Housing Element
Housing Element Goals and Policies, draft lanuary 2002
Planning Commission StaffReport, December 19, 2001, with map attachments: Existing Multiple Family
Residential Densities, Proposed Transit Oriented Development, and Proposed Transition Areas.
1
I \
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2001
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 19, 2001, special meeting of the
Planning Commission to order at7:05 p.m.
il. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Keele, Keighran (arived at 7:10 p.m.)
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Bojuds, Brownrigg
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson
m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
Iv. STUDY SESSION
1. Review of the Draft Housing Element Update
CP Monroe presented an overview ofthe draft housing element and explained the process. CA Anderson
gave an overview ofthe State requirements for updating housing elements. Commissioners noted that there
are sites identified in the element for housing opportunities, would the same opportunities be available to
other properties within the proposed residential overlay zones. Staff noted that the identified sites are
examples of properties which have the most potential for development, but other properties in the area
proposed for the overlay zones could also take advantage of the snme opportunities.
Chairman Vistica opened the meeting to public comment. Philip Katrn , l45l Capuchino Avenue, Ed Hayes
representing Peninsula Habitat for Humanity" Cathy Baylock, 1527 Newlands Avenue, Dan Anders on,72}
Vernon Way, Russ Cohen, 605 kxington Way, ke Tanton, 845 Linden Avenue, Skip Bran4 l22}Iragrura
Avenue, Chuck Mink, I 54 I Los Montes, Diane Condon-Wirgler, I 5 3 6 Clpress Avenue, and Connie Mills,
945 Laguna Avenue commented on the Draft Housing Element. Comments included: should look at the
ratio between commercial and residential and effects on revenue; interested in aftordable housing, non-
profits need incentives that help with land costs, reduced parking intransit-oriented developmentmakesthe
cost of land per unit go down, it might not mean more units but they would be more affordable, should look
at density limits for different areas; make sure there is an appropriate transition between high density and
existing neighborhoods to provide a buffer; should look at the live/work units, they can provide for transition
in commercial and industrial areas; should review parking requirements second units; should provide
opportunities for affordable senior housing near the hospital; think that the time has come for the commgnity
to accept mixed use development; concern with apartunents being torn down and replaced with high priced
condominiums; should not use reduced parking requirernent as incentive in area near Broadway, already
parking problems, might encourage residlnts to use public lots at night, could have uncovered parking rather
than in a structure.
1
}il. ADJOT}RIYMENT
Chairman Vistica adjourned themeeting at 9:20 p.m.
Commissioners continued discussion, noting that the following items should be added to the housing
element work program: ,
O Make sure there is provision in the element for public agency partrrerships for groups like teachers,
hospital workers;
E] Add policy to encourage live work units in the area south of Btrlingame Avenue
o Look at rorrirrg code changes to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed use projects;
El Extend design review to multiple family projects as a housing maintenance program;'
O Look at changing the eligibility date to qualiff for the second unit arnnestyprogram to include units built
after 1954;
O Make it ciear in Housing Element that there is very little space in Burlingame for new housing
development and document the time, effort and money spent developing this document;
o Encourage use of private foundation grants to help fund affordable units;
The consensus of the Commissior-l was to forward the Draft Housing Element to the City Council with the
, revisbns noted above. CP Monroe noted that those in attendance would be notified when the report wasto
be reviewed by the City Council. Chairman Vistica thanked those who came for their interest and
attendancei,.
Respectfrrlly submitted,
nalph Osterling, Acting Seoetary
2
UNAPPROVEDMINUTES I 2. I 9
f'
EXECUTTVE SI.JMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
By state mandate each city and county in California is required to plan for the housing needs for
its share of the expected new households in the Bay Regron over the next five years as well as
for the housing needs of all econornic segments of the city's population. This planning will be
done in Burlingame by updating the city's 1994 Housing Element of the General Plan. Broad
based community participation is essential to preparing an implementable and locally meaningful
housing policy and action program. The program included in this document evolved from the
participation and experience of over 180 local residents and representatives of agencies which
provide housing and other social service assistance to city, county and regional residents. (Sea, ,
Pages H-5 -H-7)
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
Research on the Burlingame community since 1994 identified some themes of change. While
the city's total population has remained fairly stable over the past 40 years there has been an
increase in ethnic diversity and number of children living at home as well as decrease in the
city's elder population. The proportion of the population in the labor force and their tpe of
employment have rernained constant over the decade; while the median household income
increased 6102. However, the cost of housing doubled overthe same decade. More than halfthe
city's housing stock is over 40 years old; but despite its aging the city's housing stock is well
maintained as exemplified by the number of building permits issued for improvements during the
planning period. (See Pages H-8 - H-22)
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Residential developers looking to build in Burlingame face zoning regulations and fees
comparable to those in other San Mateo cities. Like all cities in the state, but particularly because
of our location on the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside agencies have come
to play an increasing role which increases both processing time and cost of new residential
development. Since, like our San Francisco Peninsula neighbors, the city is essentially "built
out" land and conskuction costs drive up the cost of housing. While energy is a critical
parameter to future growth throughout California today, the city has been aggressive in
implementing local conservation and recycling legislation as well as disseminating information
on energy conservation progrirms offered by other agencies. (See Pages H-23 -H-40)
EVALUATION OF THE 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT
There were three key programs which were the most successful in implementing the goals and
policies ofthe 1994 Housing Element. These include the following: l) adoption of a second
unit amnesty program which allows nonconforming second units which meet certain criteria to
become a permanent part of the city's housing stock; 2) implementation of residential design
City of Burlingame H-2 General Plan
DR A['T HOI]SING RI,EMRNT
ITT ITOITSTNC R,I,T"MT'NT
EXECI.]TIVE ST]MMARY
review to provide formaintenance of the existing housing stock; and 3) rezoning of certain
commercial properties with a residential overlay zone to allow construction of high density
residential uses- These successful programs are being used as a basis for development of the
20fl-2006 work progmm where it is proposed that 1) the second unit amnesty program be
expanded to include more eligible properties; 2) apply the residential overlay zone to a wider
area; and 3) build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing developers. (See Pages
H4l - H46)
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
From a land use point of view Burlingame can be considered "retro". The City began as a
"transit village" at the Burlingame Train Station (now designated a State Historic Landmark).
Later the city annexed the Broadway train station and the "fiansit village?'adjacent to it. In 2000
a decision was made to build a new nansit hub in Millbrae on the city's northern border. Because
the land area of Burlingame is primarily built-out, new housing opportunities will have to replace
existing development In the proposed planning program the key sites for residential relse
follow the "transit village" pattern of our past, and build on the new hansit access opportunities
offered at the northern end of the city. The sites identified in the planning program near tansit
hubs are at the north end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae and near the
Broadway and Burlingame frain stations; sites in transition areas selected to improve the
compatibility between residential and other land uses are located near the Burlingame Avenue
Commercial Disfrict, along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield and on the south side of the
Northpark Aparfinents. The site selection program evaluated residential densities and
affordability and these opportunities were influenced by proximity to transit hubs. An
infrastructure study and program confirmed that collection and processing facilities are in place
to support these programs. (See Pages IJ47 - H-58)
Implementation of the 1994 Housing Element demonstated the effectiveness of using local
legislation to achieve housing policy. The single family residential design review process
effectively conserved neighborhood character while supporting maintenance of an older housing
stock. The Second Unit Amnesty program for conserving as affordable housing older second
units in the single--farnily zoned areas was established and actively implemented. Commercial
properties were converting to housing in areas where residential uses were encouraged with
overlay zoning. Through code enforcement on a multiple family project a mechanism for
retaining affordability through a local non-profit housing provider was forged.
COMMT]NITY OPPORTUNITIES
To insure the best opportunity for accomplishing the city's fair share need of 565 dwelling units,
the proposed action program for the 2001-2006 Housing Elernent builds on the successes of the
1994 work program. The most effective programs which form the basis of the 2001-2006 work
program include: legislative (zoning) incentives to build housing and affordable units;
continuation of existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability such as
second unit amnesty and design review; code enforcement; and developing successful
partnerships with non-profit housing providers. (See Pages H-59 - H-62)
City of Burlingame H-3 General Plan
DR AT-T HOIISING EI,EMENT
EXECUTIVE SI'MMARY
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AI\[D ACTTON PROGRAM
The Housing Element's goals and policies describe the city's land use and development
parameters for residential land uses. The action program for each policy describes the specific
means and targets for each progftm to implement the city's housing policies between 2001 and
2006. The Housing Element is unique bwause a quantified five year work progam is required.
Each action program also has a specified time frame. These requirements from the basis of the
annual progress report the city give to the City Council and state. (See Pages H-63 - H-79)
5"i
City of Burlingame H4 General Plan
l-l
HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS AI\D POLICIES
GOAL A:PRESBRYE RESIDBNTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOI]RAGING MAINTENAI\ICE,
IMPROYEMENT Ai\D REIIABILITATION OF TIIE CITYIS NEIGHBORHOODS
AND IIOUSING STOCI(
Policy H(A-l):
Policy H(A-2):
Policy H(A-3):
Protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods.
Continue rehabilitation of structures inpoor condition.
Maintain rental opportunities by discouraging conversion of affordable rental units to
condominiums.
Policy H(Aa):
Policy H(A-5):
Policy H(A-Q:
PolicyH(A-7):
GOAL B:
Promote programs that protect the City's lower-valued housing stock.
Pursue federal and State funds for the rehabilitation of lower and moderate income housing.
Provide pre-sale inspection upon request.
Consider neighborhood quality when approving new and remodeled residences.
PROYIDE VARIETY AI\D CHOICE OT'HOUSING BY PROMOTING HOUSING
0PPoRTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OX'AGE, SEX, RACE,
col,o& MARITAL STATUS, DTSABILTTY, NATTONAL ORIGTN OR OTIIER
BARRIERS.
Policy H@-1):
GOAL C:
Promote equal housing opportunities for all Burlingame residents.
PROYIDE HOUSING OPPORTTINITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, TBACIIBRS,
HOSPITAL WORIGRS AND OTHERS IN THE SERYICE INDUSTRY WHO
WORK IN BT]RLINGAME.
Policy H (C): Inform local public sector and private sector employees about available housing assistanoe
programs.
Policy H(C-2):
Policy H(C-i):
Encourage inclusion of affordable dwelling units in multiple-family residential development.
Encourage public agenq partnerships to provide housing, reduce commute time and
facilitate retention of community based groups like teacherc, public employees, hospital
and semice sector workers
GOAL Dr
Policy H@-l):
Policy H@-2):
Policy H@-3):
ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING.
Provide adequate, affordable housing for the City's elderly.
Encourage alterations to existing structures that improve access for physically disadvantaged.
Encourage housing opportunities for single-parent families.
Hoasing Element Goals and Policies
Policy H@a):
Policy H@-5):
GOAL E:
Policy H(E-l):
Policy H@-2):
GOAL f,':
Policy H(F-l):
Policy H(F-2):
Policy H(F-3):
Policy H@a):
Policy H(F-5):
)
Policy H(F-6):
PolicyH(F7):
Page 2
Encourage housing opportunities for low income single persons.
Support county-wide program for homeless persons.
RBDUCE RBSIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERYE ENERGY A}TD IIELP
REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
Promote the use of energy conservation in residential construction.
Encourage energy conservation measures in rehabilitation projects.
ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OT' HOUSING.
Improve balance of housing type, tenure and affordability by encouraging development of
the sites and locations listed below to serve the income levels indicated.
Vacant or Underused Sites:
1800 El Camino Real,0.9 acre zoned C-liR4 overlay
1875 California Drive, 0,33 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay
1870 El Camino Real, 0.78 acre zoned C-l/ R-4 overlay
One additional office site,0.5 acre zoned C-liR-4 overlay
Transit 0riented Sites
1730 Marco Polo Way, vacant 0.9 acre site zoned C-3
1777 Mvrchison Drive, vacant 1.3 acres zoned C-3
1825 Magnolia Drive, 1.4 acre site zoned C-3
California Drive north of Broadway, zonedC-2
Transition Areas
Rollins Road south of Bloomfield, zoned R-3
East side of Carolan between Cadillac and Toyon, 5.4 acres zoned C-2
Area south of Burlingame Avenue commercial area, zoned C-l
Maintain data base of existing R-3, R4 and CR zoning disfiicts to remain aware of the
number of additional units that could be developed on "under-developed" parcels in these
areas.
Encourage construction of mixed commercial-residential projects.
Encourage conversion of existing accessory living units to legal, safe and sanitary housing
units.
Encourage non-profit housing corporations to develop aftordable housing in appropriate sites
in Burlingame.
Work for expansion of Section 8 program in Burlingame.
Encourage participation in the San Mateo County first-time buyer program (Mortgage Credit
Certificate) and other ownership assistance progftlms.
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission Special Meeting
StaffReport
Sta@ Session to Review the 2001-2006 Draft Housing Element
Planning Commission Action:
The Plarming Cornmission should hold a public forum discussion to give and take input on the proposed
Draft of the 2001-2@6 Housing Element of the Burlingame General Plan. By the end of the meeting the
Commission should:
I . Arrive at a consensus about any changes they would recommend be made to the-proposed Draft
document; and
2. Determine ifthe document as corrected is ready to be forwarded to the City Council for their
review.
Beckground:
At the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting in February 2001, it was agreed tha the city world
proceed with the preparation ofthe State mandated update oftte Housing Elernent ofthe General Plan.
After hiring an arhising consrhant, stafibegan the process ofupdating tle 1994 Housing Elerrort" InJrme
and Sep,tember two widety publicized prblic workshops w€re held. The first fucused on commurdty
changes in populatio4 employment and housing since 1994. The group also reviewed and updated the
Goals and Policy statemert of the 1994 Housing Element. At the second wortshop the participants
disossed potential sites for new housing units. Over all sonre 180 residents and 15 agencies wtich
r€pres€nt vadous social serviceq housing interests and environmental concems were invited to paticiple in
the workshops.
Foltowing the wortslropg the input was incorporaed into a draft iiftie propoeil 200l-2006 Housirtg
Element. The prqpose of the Special Study Meeting ofthe Plaoning Coinurission is to review the policies
and the implementation programs proposed for the next 5 years. Staffsrggests the following struclure for
tle meaing:
- Statrp€s€ot the State madated requiremerb for housing elements, m overview ofthe
major findfuE$ md prcgram recomm€oddions oftheproposed200l-2006mHoudng
Element
Commission and pubffc engage in a disanssion, managed by the Commission chairmarq
ofthe mnteot ofthe proposed elernen!
Staffwill keep frack ofany uggested changes to the report;
At the eod of the meeing Cornmission shoutd direct staffabout whetler the report is
ready, with changes incorporate4 to forward to City Counol fortheir review or r*ether
a second meeting to rwiew uggested changes should be scheduled.
MEETINGDATE
Dccember 19,2fi)1
*t-
. Stlf Sasiln a Rcricw du 2lN1-21)06 Dr$ Howing Elanat Deccmba 19, 2001
Housing Elcment Draft
Attached to the staf report is a copy of the Executive Sunrmary for the 2C{JL-2C06 ]lsusing El€,ment.
Please use this as a guide for your review of the cofrent of the various sections ofthe Draft 2001-2006
Housing Etement. Discussion will focus on the Goalg Policies and Action Program section It is this
Section that defines what the city will do to facilitate accomplish€nt of its fair share housing and
corrmunity housing needs for the coming 5 years.
Ncrt Stcps in Housing Element Review and Adoption
The state maodate on Housing Elernents requires that the city zubmit a preliminary draft of ils 2001-20O2
Housing Element to the Calitomia Department ofHousing and Cmmity Dwdo@t ([ICD) for rcviow
and cornment be,fore the City takes fonnal adopion action on the element. After a 60 day rwiew poiod
HCD will notify the city about any adjustrnerns or revisions which they would suggest be made to qualify
the elerne1rt for State certific6ion Staffwill then preseirt the Housing Elernent fofmally to the Plaming
Commissiou- 'Er t}is presedation staffwill inchrde suggestiom about changes which world be needeq if
any, to comply with the HCD direction. The Plauring Commission will study the doorment and
mggestions, hold a public heariag and make a recommendation to City Council on whether the revised
element shogtd be adopted as a part of tie city's General Plan. Only the City Council can adopt
amendments to the General Plaq so the City Council will also hold a public hearing and take ftral action on
the 2001-2006 Houfig Element amending the General Plan.
Attachments:
Executive Sunrmary, Draft 2001-2006 Housing Element
Under separate cover: Draft 2001-2006 Housing Elemen! November 28, 2001
2
rIIIffi
mx
ZONING LEGEND
R-1 . SINGLE FAMILY
R 2. DUPLEXRi. MULTI-FAMILY
R.4 r MULTI-FAMILY
CR r COMMERCIAURESIDENTIAL
G1 WITH R-4 OVERI-AY
CITY OF BURLINGAME
RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAP
A{STING MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DE'VS'T'ES
o(
_/
od
50
40
18 Units/Acre
.d
o(
40 UnltVAcre
38 35 Unlts/Acre
rgryry oF HtusEoRouGH 44 31 Units/Acre
N
3il Unlls/Acre
w
lOm 0 1000 2000 Fcct
I
r"Al
:-l r_l -\X
Unl6/Acre
':d,i. '*;.'
4t,.
...?
BART/Mlllbrae
Train Statono
CITY OF BURLINGAME
RESIDENTIAL ZOMNG MAP
PROPOSED TRANS'T OruENTED DEVELO PM ENT
o(
_/
,f
TOWN OF HILLSAOROUGH .d
o(
N
E
1000 0 1000 2000 F.ot:S
R.1
R2. DUPLEX
(>
.,1.,..'
':': . t',;i
,i:
(
l CITY OF BURLINGAME
RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAP
PROPOS ED TRANSITI O N AREAS
--*
o(
.d
o(
.d
N
e
s
nIII
tifiitillm
ffi pnoposEorRANs
R.2
R.3
R.4
CR a
I
ZONING LEG
G1 WITH R-4
R.1 r
r MULTI:FAMILY
LYSINGLE FAMI
OUPLEX
BART/Mlllbrae
Traln Statona
r-
TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
.j
1000 1000 Feet0
.:1,,',.
t':
I
,l
HOUSINGELEMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 27,2001
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
- Mary Janney, Mayor
Mike Coffey, Vice-Mayor
Joe Galligan
Rosalie O'Mahoney
Cathy Baylock
Mike Spinelli
PLANNING COMMISSION
-
Stanley Vistica, Chairman
Ann Keighran, Vice-Chair
Tim Auran
Joe Boju6s
Mike Brownrigg
Chris Keele
Ralph Osterling
Jerry Deal
Martin Dreiling
Dave Luzuriaga
CITY STAFF
Jim Nantell, City Manager
Larry Anderson, City Attorney
Planning Denartment Staff
The Housing Element was researched and written by Planning Department staff with review assistance by Jeff
Baird of Baird + Driscoll.
Meg Monroe, City Planner
_ Maureen Brooks, Senior Planner
Ruben Hurin, Planner
Catherine Keylon, Planner
- Erika Lewit, Zoning Technician
S ean O'Rourke, Zoning Technician
Shelagh Girot, Administrative Secretary
PUBLIC PARTICIPANTS:
180 members of the public and l5 public agencies were notified of and participated in the Housing Element
- workshops and study meetings.
L
HOUSING ELEMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 27, 2001
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........
INTRODUCTION.........
Backdrop
Housing Element..
Housing Goals, Policies and Action Program....
Consistency with Other General Plan Elements
Civic Engagement ...................
Actions Required/Zoning changes
Public Facility Capacity
COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
Goals and PoIicies................
Action Program
Summary of Housing Program Implementation ..............
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION......
DATA SOURCES.
Appendix A - Community Profile and Projections........
........H-2
........H-5
H-5
....H-5
H-6
H-6
H-7
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY...........H-8
Burlingame Today.....
Housing Needs Assessment ................
At Risk Assisted Housing Development ...... H-19
Projected Housing Need............... H-20
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES....
Constraints to Development.......H-23
..H-23Government.
Non-government ..........H-32
Energy Conservation Opportunities H-36
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM ..... H-41
COMMUNITY RESOURCES............H-47
Land Inventory and Site Identification....
..H-8
H-10
.......H-59
H-47
H-s6
H-58
H-63
H-66
H-75
Appendix B - Guide to Energy Conservation.
Appendix C - Housing Funding Opportunities in San Mateo County
...... H-86
... H-87
........... H_87
H-80
H-105
H-rt2
Appendix D - Public Participation ........................... H-115
F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
EXECUTTVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
By state mandate each city and county in California is required to plan for the housing needs for
its share of the expected new households in the Bay Region over the next five years as well as
for the housing needs of all economic segments of the city's population. This planning will be
done in Burlingame by updating the city's 1994 Housing Element of the General Plan. Broad
based community participation is essential to preparing an implementable and locally meaningful
housing policy and action program. The program included in this document evolved from the
participation and experience of over 180 local residents and representatives of agencies which
provide housing and other social service assistance to city, county and regional residents. (See
Pages H-5 -H-7)
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
Research on the Burlingame community since 1994 identified some themes of change. While
the city's total population has remained fairly stable over the past 40 years there has been an
increase in ethnic diversity and number of children living at home as well as decrease in the
city's elder population. The proportion of the population in the labor force and their type of
employment have remained constant over the decade; while the median household income
increased 6l%. However, the cost of housing doubled over the same decade. More than half the
city's housing stock is over 40 years old; but despite its aging the city's housing stock is well
maintained as exemplified by the number of building permits issued for improvements during the
planning period. (See Pages H-8 - H-22)
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Residential developers looking to build in Burlingame face zoning regulations and fees
comparable to those in other San Mateo cities. Like all cities in the state, but particularly because
of our location on the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside agencies have come
to play an increasing role which increases both processing time and cost of new residential
development. Since, like our San Francisco Peninsula neighbors, the city is essentially "built
out" land and construction costs drive up the cost of housing. While energy is a critical
parameter to future growth throughout California today, the city has been aggressive in
implementing local conservation and recycling legislation as well as disseminating information
on energy conservation programs offered by other agencies. (See Pages H-23 - H-40)
EVALUATION OF THE 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT
There were three key programs which were the most successful in implementing the goals and
policies of the 1994 Housing Element. These include the following: 1) adoption of a second
unit amnesty program which allows nonconforming second units which meet certain criteria to
become a perrnanent part of the city's housing stock; 2) implementation of residential design
review to provide for maintenance of the existing housing stock; and 3) rezoning of certain
City of Burlingame H-2 General Plan
DRAF'T r.,I ,RMENT
EXECUTTVE SUMMARY
commercial properties with a residential overlay zone to allow construction of high density
residential uses. These successful programs are being used as a basis for development of the
200l-2006 work program where it is proposed that: l) the second unit amnesty program be
expanded to include more eligible properties; 2) apply the residential overlay zone to a wider
area; and 3) build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing developers. (See Pages
H-41 - H-46)
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
From a land use point of view Burlingame can be considered "retro". The City began as a
"transit village" at the Burlingame Train Station (now designated a State Historic Landmark).
Later the city annexed the Broadway train station and the "transit village" adjacent to it. In 2000
a decision was made to build a new transit hub in Millbrae on the city's northern border. Because
the land area of Burlingame is primarily built-out, new housing opportunities will have to replace
existing development. In the proposed planning program the key sites for residential reuse
follow the "transit village" pattern of our past, and build on the new transit access opportunities
offered at the northern end of the city. The sites identified in the planning progam near transit
hubs are at the north end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae and near the
Broadway and Burlingame fain stations; sites in transition areas selected to improve the
compatibility between residential and other land uses are located near the Burlingame Avenue
Commercial District, along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield and on the south side of the
Northpark Apartments. The site selection program evaluated residential densities and
affordability and these opportunities were influenced by proximity to transit hubs. An
infrastructure study and program confirmed that collection and processing facilities are in place
to support these programs. (See Pages H-47 - H-58)
Implementation of the 1994 Housing Element demonstrated the effectiveness of using local
legislation to achieve housing policy. The single family residential design review process
effectively conserved neighborhood character while supporting maintenance of an older housing
stock. The Second Unit Amnesty program for conserving as affordable housing older second
units in the single family zoned areas was established and actively implemented. Commercial
properties were converting to housing in areas where residential uses were encouraged with
overlay zoning. Through code enforcement on a multiple family project a mechanism for
retaining affordability through a local non-profit housing provider was forged.
COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES
To insure the best opportunity for accomplishing the city's fair share need of 565 dwelling units,
the proposed action program for the 2001-2006 Housing Element builds on the successes of the
1994 work program. The most effective programs which form the basis of the 2001-2006 work
program include: legislative (zoning) incentives to build housing and affordable units;
continuation of existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability such as
second unit amnesty and design review; code enforcement; and developing successful
partnerships with non-profit housing providers. (See Pages H-59 - H'62)
City of Burlingame H-3 General Plan
D FT HOIISING ELEMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
The Housing Element's goals and policies describe the city's land use and development
parameters for residential land uses. The action program for each policy describes the specific
means and targets for each program to implement the city's housing policies between 2001 and
2006. The Housing Element is unique because a quantified five year work program is required.
Each action program also has a specified time frame. These requirements from the basis of the
annual progress report the city give to the City Council and state. (See Pages H- 63 - H-79)
City ofBurlingame H-4 General Plan
DRAFT HO rN(: NI,EMF"NT
INTRODUCTION
BACKDROP
The City of Burlingame is a community of 28,100 located roughly in the center of the San
Francisco Peninsula. Two of the five square mile area of the City is located in San Francisco Bay
and protected from development. The City adjoins San Francisco International Airport, a major
regional focal point and employer. An extension to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system
is cunently under constuction just north of Burlingame's city boundary; within a third to half
mile of developed areas of Burlingame.
Burlingame began as a "transit village", actually two such villages. The City got its start in 1908
at its two railroad stations, the main station at Burlingame Avenue and a secondary station at
Broadway (annexed later). The city's civic center and largest commercial area focused on the
Burlingame Avenue station and was quickly surrounded by single-family houses and summer
cottages. The same was true for Broadway's more neighborhood oriented commercial district. In
the 1920's, as the city grew, the single family houses closest to the civic center/downtown area
were replaced with multiple family buildings. This pattem has continued. Today 51% of the
city's residential development is in multiple family buildings, grouped around the hain stations
and along the major transit corridors, including El Camino Real (State Route 82) which carries
buses the length of the Peninsula. Because of the city's location and its access to a variety of
types ofregional transportation including San Francisco Intemational Airport and to major
employment centers, it is not surprising that 52Yo of the city's housing stock is rented.
Burlingame is physically built out. Because there is no place to grow, Burlingame's population
grew by only 5 percent in the past decade. Most of the physical growth since 1994 dwelling
units) can be attributed to in-Iill development, primarily replacement of single family houses
with apartment or condominium buildings located in hansportation corridors or in areas
proximate to the city's hain stations. But while the total population did not change much, the
proportion of the city's residents over 60 and under 18 shifted significantly, which affected the
tumover and remodeVreplacement of the city's older single family housing stock.
THE HOUSING ELEMENT
Each city and county in Califomia is required to plan for the housing needs ofall economic
segments of its population. Article 10.6 of the Govemment Code sets forth requirements for a
Housing Element, one of the seven mandatory elements ofa local general plan. The substantive
requirements for a housing element are set forth in section 65583 ofthe code. Recent
amendments to the code require communities in the nine Bay Area counties to update their
Housing Elements by December 31, 2001.
The law sets out guidelines for the preparation and adoption ofa Housing Element. Local
govemments are required to "make a diligent effort" to involve a1l economic segments of their
population in development ofthe Housing Element. The future local housing needs numbers for
Burlingame which are to be addressed in the housing element were developed by the Association
of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Local governments are also directed by the code to address
City of Burlingame H-5 General Plan
INTRODUCTION
DRAF'T HOI]SING EI,EMF],NT
INTRODUCTION
this need by lowering barriers and encouraging the construction ofhousing for all economic
segments of the population; but local governments are not required by State mandate to build
housing directly or commit the city's operating funds to the effort of building housing.
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES Ai\D ACTION PROGRAM
The Burlingame Housing Element is a statement of community housing goals and policies. It
outlines the strategies that will be pursued to implement the community's housing objectives
during the planning period (2001-2006). The action program identifies the strategies to be
pursued in conserving and improving the existing housing stock, in providing adequate sites for
future housing; in assisting in developing affordable housing, in removing government
constraints which might affect housing production and cost; and in promoting housing
opportunities within the community. The goals, policies and action progmm for the 2001-2006
Burlingame Housing Element is included in this report as its own section.
Research Resources
Burlingame's current Housing Element was prepared in l994.It was certified by the Califomia
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that year. The present document is
an update ofthe 1994 Housing Element. This updated element uses population data from the
1990 and 2000 US Census; housing and employment data from the 1990 census; income data
from the 1990 Census and State Department of Housing and Community Development;
projections from the Association ofBay Area Govemments Projections 2000 forecasts for the
San Francisco Bay Area; ABAG's Certified Final Regional Housing Needs Determination
(RHND) Allocation, March 15,2001; and current local aftitudes and opportunities related to
housing collected from local sources as referenced in the text. A list ofall the data sources used
in preparation of Burlingame's 2001-2006 Housing Element is included at the end of the
document. (See Data Sources Section, Page H-68)
CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS
The whole of Burlingame's General Plan or development policy is made up of nine elements.
One ofthese is the Housing Element. It is essential that the goals and policies ofall ofthe
General Plan elements should be internally and mutually supportive. If the Housing Element as
adopted makes other elements of the general plan inconsistent, they should be adjusted.
Together the other elements of Burlingame's general plan establish goals, policies, objectives
and actions that affect housing. These otier elements establish categories ofnet residential
density which are confirmed on the plan diagram: low density up to 8 dwelling units per acre;
medium density 9 to 20; medium high density 21- 50; and high density over 50 dwelling units
per acre. Areas ofthe city are identified as having potential for medium high residential density
include areas around the periphery of the Burlingame Avenue-Park Road center (including
Subarea C of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area), around the Broadway shopping center,
and as a part ofthe complex ofactives in the Burlingame Plaza area (north end of Burlingame).
Areas having potential for high density residential development are identified between Rollins
Road and Carolan, as well as on the north and south sides ofthe Burlingame Avenue
Commercial. Area. The areas identified for future housing development in the 2001-2006
City ofBurlingame H-6 General Plan
DR AF'T HOIISING RI,EMENT
INTRODUCTION
Housing Element are consistent with this planned pattern of residential development. A review
of the policies, objectives and actions of the other elements indicates that the proposed policies
and implementing actions of this Housing Element are also consistent with the intent of these
other elements.
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
To be effective housing policy must reflect the values of the community and must be the product
of participation of a broad base of local interests. Burlingame's Housing Element update
program included: two widely advertised public work shops, including direct invitations to all
local and county-wide housing providers; an advertised and invitational open study meeting of
Planning Commission; public hearings on the preliminary draft before the Planning Commission
and City Council prior to initial submittal to the Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD); and, following action by HCD, publicly advertised study meetings and
public hearings for adoption before both the Planning Commission and City Council.
All meetings to develop the 2001-2006 draft of the Housing Element were advertised widely, not
only to local residents and organizations but to all non-profit housing providers, many union
representatives and members of the development community. Among the agencies and
organizations were: the Home Builders Association, Shelter Network, Call Primrose Center,
Interfaith Hospitality Network, MidPeninsula Housing Coalition, Center for Independence of the
Disabled, Habitat for Humanity, Human Investment Project, Burlingame Lions Club, HIP
Housing, Supportive Housing Workgroup of SMC, Green Belt Alliance, NP Housing
Association of Northern California, Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County, and the
Peninsula Policy Partnership. In addition, 180 Burlingame residents and business people were
contacted directly and regularly notified of meetings and opportunities to participate.
All documents, workshop workbooks, recordings of workshops, workshop feedback reports,
preliminary drafts and final drafts of the Housing Element are available on the city's web site
www.burlingame.org, Planning Department Web Page. Through this medium residents can
interact directly with staff and the commission regarding the content of any of these documents.
PREPARATION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT
The Housing Element was prepared in house by City Planning Department staff with technical
assistance provided by Jeff Baird of Baird + Driscoll Planning Consultants. Staff has spent more
than 500 hours of time preparing the Housing Element at a cost of approximately $47,000.00
(including stafftime, public notices, document printing and consultant fees). The Housing
Element programs were developed building on the lessons learned through the implementation of
the 1994 Housing Element and by widening the scope of the successful Housing Element
programs.
City of Burlingame H-7 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
BURLINGAME TODAY
The Residents
With the turn toward growth, other aspects of the city's resident population have also changed
since 1990:1'2
o the population has become more diverse, with almost one-quarter (23.1%) minority;
tr an increase in children under 18 to 19.2%, with almost a quarter of these under 5
years ofage in 2000;
tr a notable decrease (from 23.6% to 19.l%) in the number of residents over 60; and
o with the median age of Burlingame residents of 38.4 years, the city population is still
older than that of San Mateo County (36.8 years).
Burlingame's resident population only started to grow recently. The City's 28,158 population in
2000 is only 3 percent larger than its 1970 population.r'2 The Association of Bay Area
government's projections anticipate, however, that the city will continue to grow, reaching a
population of 31,500 by 2010.5
Burlingame's residents live in 12,869 dwelling units, 51% of which are in multiple family
structuies and 52o/o of which are rented.e The Citv's household characteristics reflect the more
urban flavor of this "suburban" community.l'2
tr the average household size in owner occupied units (single family or multiple family
condominium) is 2.58 persons; the average household size of rental units is 1.87
persons;
o Population: Over the past 40 years, Burlingame's total population has remained fairly
stable, but there has been and increase in diversity of the population and number of
children, and a decrease in the elderly population.
tr Employment: Burlingame's resident labor force and type of employment has remained
stable over the decade; and the median household income has increasedby 6l%.
tr Housing Characteristics: The cost of housing in Burlingame has more than doubled in
the past decade. More than half the housing stock in Burlingame is over 40 years old, but
despite its aging, the city's housing stock is well maintained as exemplified by the number
of building permits issued for improvements during the planning period.
Key Findings:
City of Burlingame H-8 General Plan
DRAFT H SING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMLINITY
tr the average number persons living in each household in Burlingame is 2.21 , while the
average in San Mateo County is 2.74 persons;
tr just over half (55%) ofthe households in the city are families; and 7.7Yoof these
family households are headed by single females, 45% of whom have children under
18 living with them;
o while overcrowding was minimal in Burlingame (1.4 to 1.8%) through the 1980's, in
1990 the census identified 3.7o/o of the city's dwelling units to be overcrowded, (33
units owner occupied and 425 units renter occupied);
tr vacancy rate is one measure ofhousing demand, in April 2000 Burlingame's
residential vacancy rate was 2.8%, compared to San Mateo County's 2.5%;o and the
Bay Area Region's 3.5%; and
o in 2000 vacancy rates among owner occupied units was less than I percent (0.4%)
and among rental units was 2.2%o, irldicating the strong demand for homeownership,
even though the majority ofthe city's housing stock is rental.
Like the population, the City's resident labor force and type of employment was stable through
most of the 1990's. While the new century has brought indications of growth along with
unexpected economic challenges that may significantly affect the validity of the projections,
available data provides some insights.
O 17,660 of the City's 28,158 residents ar-e employed, with an average unemployment
rate for the decade of the 90's of 2.8%;3
tr between 1990 and 2000 the median household income as noted by HCD for San
Mateo County increased by 610/o from $46,437 to $74,900 from 1990 to 2000; t5
o the majority of the City's residents were employed in the service (34.8%), trade
(22.1%)*d fir*.. (i2.6%) sectors of the i.onorny in 1990;2
tr ABAG projected in Projections 2000, 960 new jobs in Burlingame bV J005, which
will result in generating a housing demand for 303 dwelling units; and5
o the City's major employers are Peninsula Hospital (2,555 employees), the city's 6
major hotels (1,525 employees), and two food processing businesses (430
employees); the vast majority of businesses located in Burlingame employ fewer than
100 people.r3
Housing Characteristics
The late 1990's was a "boom" period for new construction and residential remodeling in
Burlingame.
o in 2000 there were 12,869 housing units in Burlingame;e
o over two-thirds (65.8%) ofthe city's housing units are more than 40 years old
(8,022), built before 1960, and almost a third (32%) arc more than 60 years old
(4,04r);e
tr between 1994 and 1999, 152 housing units were added to the city's housing stock. Of
these new units 102 were in multiple family structures and 2 were single family;e
City ofBurlingame H-9 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
o based on building permit activity in 2000, almost 8% of the city's housing stock was
issued a building permit to make maintenance repairs or improvements that year
alone;e
tr the median cost of a single family house in Burlingame doubled from 1990 to 2000
from $302,516 to $811,418; the median cost ofa residential condominium increased
from $186,083 to $382,005 in the same time period;8 and
O average monthly rent in 2000 was $1,950; the median gross rent reported in the 1990
Census was $729.4
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Fundamental to Burlingame's housing policies and programs is an assessment of the components
ofthe city's housing stock and the resident's needs. To determine the size and appropriate
programmatic approaches, the needs assessment is divided into segments: household conditions,
housing stock conditions, housing needs ofspecial segments of the resident population, and
evaluation of potential conversion of "affordable" units to market rate.
Household Conditions
Households by tenure: The majority of Burlingame residents are renters. In 1990 the census
showed 6,457 householders were renters and 5,872 householders were owners. This means that
in 1990 ofthe 12,329 occrpied units, 52olo were occupied by renters. Because the family size of
those living in rental units is smaller (1.82 persons), only 44%o of the City's 1990 population
lived in rental units. The 1990 census also showed that 79Yo of rcnters in the city lived in
buildings with 3 or more units;17%o of the renters lived in single-family homes. More than half
(55%) the renters in 1990 were between the ages of 25 and 44, and almost half (49.9%) lived
alone while 31% lived with one other person. In the 2000 census it is noted that the average
household size for rental units in Burlingame is 1.87, which is not a significant change from
1990's 1.82 average household size.
The demographics ofhomeowners in 1990 were different from that ofrenters. Over a third
(38.6%) were over 65 years ofage and only 8.5%o were 25 to 35 years ofage. Another 21.5%
were 35 to 44 years ofage. The average number ofpeople per household among homeowners
was 2.48. The 2000 Census shows that the average number ofpeople per household for
homeowners has increased to 2.58.
City ofBurlingame H-10 General Plan
Between 1994 and 1999 Burlingame has added 117 new residential units; of these 3l (27%o) have
been multiple family rental units.e Some of the residential condominiums built early in the
decade were held by the developers and used as rental income properties; however, this trend
stopped early on. Because ofa strong real estate market in the most of the 1990's, it is assumed
that the remaining 101 residential condominium units are now owner occupied.
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMI]NITY
Overcrowding: For those living in the city's rental units in 2000, the average monthly rent was
$1,950, compared to a median reported gross rent in the 1990 census of $726.4 This represents an
increase in rents of more than 150o/o over the decade. Such increases in rents can result in more
people sharing space and an increase in overcrowded units, e.g. more than one person per room
in a dwelling unit. However, ifone compares average household size ofowner-occupied and
renter-occupied units in 1990 to 2000, the household sizes are similar. ln 1990 the average
household size for an owner-occupied house was 2.48 persons compared to 2.58 persons in 2000.
In 1990 the average household size for a renter was 1.82 persons and in 2000 it was 1.87
persons. These numbers indicate that overcrowding as a housing problem has not increased
significantly in Burlingame over the decade. Using tle measure ofmore than one person per
room for overcrowding, there were 458 overcrowded residential units in Burlingame in 1990.
Given the similarity of average household size between 1990 and 2000, and projecting this
number by the 5% growth in the City's population, 480 seems to be an acceptable target number
for overcrowded units for the 2001-2006 Housing Element.
Affordability and Eligibility for Housing Assistance Programs: In 2000 the Association ofBay
Area Govemments published a projection of mean household income for Burlingame. Based on
these figures ($81,700) the incomes of half the households in the city qualifr as moderate income
e.g. annual income of 120% of San Mateo County median ($74, 900). In fact the upper limit on
the moderate income category is $89,900.
Among the groups in San Mateo County whose incomes are commonly below the median
income for the county are:
Very Low Income
Retired Couple (monthly income $1692)
Couple, employed full time at minimum wage (monthly income $2167)
Preschool teacher (monthly income $ 1935)
Low Income
Secondary School teacher (monthly income $3,614)
Source; State of Califomia, Occupational Employmelt Statistics Survey, Fourth Quarrer 2000.
Affordability is a critical issue in housing need. When people cannot afford housing they double
up (with more than one family or multiple roommates in a unit) and units become overcrowded
or they make long commutes to work from areas where housing is more affordable. Life style is
also an issue in affordability. If it takes two adults to pay the rent, and one wishes to stay home
with the children; the family may have to move to afford the rent. This may mean a change in
employment location as well because the cost of commuting can exceed the difference in rent.
A broader look by industries located in Burlingame shows annual average pay for workers. The
California Employment Development Department publishes information by county on the
employment and wages ofvarious business and industry groups. The most recent of this data for
San Mateo County is for 1997. The data is presented by number ofemployees and average
annual pay by industry. A review of the data show that a number of industries providing services
that are significant in Burlingame's economy have average annual pay for employees in the very
H-ll General PlanCity ofBurlirgame
DRAF'T HOI]SING EI,EMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
low and lower income level. Types of employment ranking the among very low income level
(50% of county median income) are:
Hotel/Jvlotel employees
Beauticians/Barbers
Secretaries
Building Maintenance workers
Car Rental business employees
Amusement and Recreational service workers
Nursing care facilities workers
Day care providers.
Among types of employment ranking in the lower income level (80% of county median income)
are:
Private elementary and secondary school teacher
Dental office workers
Car leasing
Auto Repair
Public elementary and secondary school teachers
Income levels are defined by size of household as well as percentage of county median income
eamed. In San Mateo County the median income in 2000 was $74, 900. A single low income
person could earn $26,200 and a family of four, $37,450 ayear to qualiff. A lower income
individual could earn $40,800 a year and a family of four, $58,300 ayear and qualiff. A very
low income family of four can afford $936 a month in rent; a single person $655. A lower
income family of four can afford $1457 a month in rent; a single person $1020.
It is clear that many of the workers we depend on both in terms of the city's economic base and
for our quality of life in Burlingame cannot afford housing in the city, rental or homeownership.
Moreover, some professions thought of as being "well or highly paid" may have adequate
incomes for individuals or couples; but become low or moderate income when stretched to cover
the costs of a family of four. For example, the average annual wage in the computer
programming business in 2000 was $80,475. If that income were stretched to cover a family of 4,
the family would be considered "moderate income" earning less than 120% of the San Mateo
County median income of $74,900.
Households overpaying: While not located in the heart of Silicon Valley, Burlingame's location
with easy access to San Francisco and San Jose, adjacent to San Francisco International Airport,
has caused the housing stock to experience an unprecedented increase in owner value and rental
cost between 1990 and 2000. The 1990 Census shows the median value of an owner occupied
house in Burlingame to be $461,800. The Sustainable San Mateo County yearly report card
shows the median sales price of a single-family house in Burlingame in 2000 to be $811,418.
This indicates an increase in value of more thanT5o/o over the decade. Rental housing, 52o/o of
H-12 General PlanCity of Burlingame
DRAFT HOI]SING I,F',MENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
the units in the city, has increased in cost to the renter over the decade by an even gleater
proportion. The median gross rent in 1990 was $726 compared to the average monthly rent
reported in the Sustainable San Mateo county Report card for the year 2000 of$1,950; a 169%
increase.
Table H-l - HOUSEHOLDS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSING IN BURLINGAME 2OO()
I "Over 65" rows all assume Over 65 homeowners and tenters decline as total Over 65 population declined from
1990 to 2000.
Source: Burlingame Planning Depanment 1990 and 2000 Census, Fall 2001
Using U.S. Census data for 1990 and 2000 as shown on the Households Overpaying for Housing
in Burlingame 1990 and 2000 Table, it is estimated that 26% of Burlingame's household
population is paying more than 30% oftheir gross annual income for housing. More renters, 29%
(1,872 households) are overpaying than homeowners,23% (1400). Because of the limited 2000
Census information on housing available, these estimates have been derived from 2000 data
available and trends evident in the 1990 census, adjusted by the change in Burlingame's
population over 65.
Homeowner ProJile
Most of the homeowners in Burlingame have lived in the city a long time and purchased their
houses many years ago. The 1990 census shows that over a third ofthe owner occupied units in
the city have no mortgage; and 57.6Yo ofthe homeowners in the city had lived in their houses
more than l0 years. In 1990 a much smaller proportion of the 5872 homeowners had just moved
into Burlingame; in 1990, 6.8% of the homeowners had lived in the city less than a year. Another
striking fact about homeowners in Burlingame in 1990 was their age. Over a third (38.5%) were
over th; age of65. Many ofthese elder residents live on fixed incomes and as housing values
rose over the decade, sold their homes. High rents in Burlingame and on the Peninsula
2000 7o Change1990o/o
28,158 5%26,801Totd Populstion
t5%-17%t9%4,2875,167Over 65
12,51 I12,329Totrl Occupied Housing Units
48%5,872 48%5,987
t4%6t%4,109 69%3,608Under 65
1,878r 3t%-17%2,264 39%65 and Over
1,400 23%2%r,373 23%Homeowners Overpaying
5%1,166 85%|,228
172l t2%-t7%20765 and Over
6,524 52o/o r%6,457 s2%Renters
87%5,462 85%s,698Under 65
-l7o/ot5%826r t3%65 and Over
r,872 29%t%1,853 29%Renters Overpaying
72%fi%|,216 66%t,344Under 65
5291 28%-17%637 34%65 and Over
III
I
City ofBurlingame H-13 General Plan
Homeowners
88%Under 65
t5%
995
DR AET Hr)ITSIN': T',I,F,ME',NT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
discouraged many from staying in the area. This is reflected inthe l7%o decrease in Burlingame's
elder population over the decade.
A small but significant portion of Burlingame's homeowners, often overhoused, are the large
families e.g. those families with 5 or more persons per households. The 1990 Census shows that
391 large families owned homes in Burlingame. Projecting the number of large families by the
5% growth in the city's population; there would be 410 such large families owned homes
Burlingame in 2000.
Renter Profile
The dramatic increase in the cost of rental units in Burlingame, a city with 5l% of its housing in
multiple family units and 52o/o of its housing units rented, is most notable. As reflected in the
change in rents, the city's rental market has also changed its niche, with the median rents in the
city in 2000 moving from affordable-to-moderate-income-wage- eamers to market rate. At the
time the 1994 housing element was adopted, a large share of rental units in Burlingame were
affordable for households with moderate incomes. Since 1994 rents in the city have risen and are
no longer as affordable. At today's rents, the typical single individual who rents in Burlingame
will have to have an employed roommate to avoid paying more than 30% of their income for
housing. over the decade only 3l multiple family rental units were added to the city's housing
stock.' Therefore, most ofthis rental increase occurred in the city's older rental housing stock,
affecting long-term renters the most.
Tenure among renters is strikingly different from homeowners. In 1990, a third (35.9%) had
lived in the city less than a year and another third (37.1%) had rented in Burlingame 5years or
less. Only 4% had rented housing in the city for twenty years or more.
The most cost sensitive group oflong term renters are the elderly population living on fixed
incomes. In 1990, 15.4% (992) of the city's renters were over the age of65; and over a quarter
(26.6%) of the city's residents received social security income. The elder population ofthe city
declined lTYo between 1990 and 2000. One of reasons was the financial incentive offered by the
dramatic increase in the value of owner occupied housing. This probably resulted in departure of
more of the elderly homeowners than long-term elderly renters. The projected number ofelder
renters in the city in 2000, is 826. Of these elder renters 526 are estimated to be overpaying e.g.
paying more than 30% of their gross annual income on housing.
Another group ofrenters that frequently overpays for housing is larger families, households with
more than five members. In 1990 there were 273large family households in Burlingame who
were renters. Over the decade the city's population grew by 5Vo. lt is estimated that the number
of large family households increased by the same percentage. Further projecting owner and
renter proportions based on 1990 trends; it is estimated that 413 ofthese larger families are
homeowners and 287 are renters.
City ofBurlingame H-14 General Plan
DRAFT HOIISING EI,EMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNIry
Housing Stock Conditions
Housing units by type: There are 12,869 dwelling units in Burlingame (2000 US Census). Of
these 5l%, 6,563 units, are multiple family (more than one unit per structure) and 6,306 are
detached single family houses on lots varying in size from 3,500 SF to 10,000 SF plus. The
typical lot size in the ciry is 5,000 SF.
With 48.4o/o of its housing stock in single-family residential units, Burlingame was the only city
in San Mateo County with less than one-half its housing stock in single-family units in 1990.
Construction in Burlingame since 1990 has been dominated by multiple family units. Between
1994 and 2000, -l l7 dwelling units were added in Burlingame; and all, except 2 of them, were
multiple family.v So if anyhing, the predominance of multiple family units in the Burlingame
market has increased over the decade.
Housing units in need of repair or replacement: Overall the high demand for living units in
Burlingame has insured an unusually high level of maintenance for both structures with multiple
family units and for owner occupied and rented single-family houses. Over half (57.6%) of the
city's multiple family rental housing was built between 1950 and 1979;20% was built before
1939. Given their convenient location to transit terminals with regional access for the great
majority of these multiple family units, eleven of these rental units are in high demand as
indicated by a 2.2 %o vacancy rate in 2000. These apartment units are generally occupied by
single workers or couples who commute to San Francisco or older, retired men and women who
wish to live near shopping, regional transportation and community activity centers. All ofthese
units have been well maintained, with only a few structural code enforcement actions a year.
Single-family housing is in greater demand than apartments in Burlingame. The vacancy rate
among owner occupied units in 2000 was less than one percent (0.4%). The great majority (89%)
of Burlingame's single-family homes were built before 1970. In fact,46.7Yo were built before
1939; and over three quarters (78.7%) were built before the City's last major single-family tract,
the Mills Estates, was developed in 1960. Given their location with good regional access, a
superior school system, and sunny weather, all ofthe city's single-family housing units have
maintained or increased their value. Because ofthe substantial increase in value over the decade
of the 1990's, many owners ofolder houses have reinvested their increased equity back into
maintenance and remodeling. In 2000, building permits for maintenance or remodel
improvements that required up grade to current building/fire code requirements were issued to
4.8oh of the residential dwelling units in the city. Between 1994 and 1999 a yearly average of
6.250A of the total residential units in the city were issued permits for maintenance, remodel or
improvements.
The city's code enforcement officer's annual reports indicate that he pursues 3 to 4 residential
health and safety nuisance abatements a year including both single and multiple family units.
Over a 5 year period this would represent 20 dwelling units with severe s health and safety
City ofBurlingame H-15 Geneml Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMLTNITY
problems. His experience is that because ofthe size of Burlingame's older population (19%) and
the fact that these older residents are frequently the original owner of the structure, these code
enforcements are often maintenance issues which arise from age, illness and lack of economic
resources of the property owner.
Special Needs Groups
The state mandates that the housing needs ofspecial groups within the Burlingame resident
population also be addressed in the city's housing policies and programs. These groups with
special needs have been identified as: the disabled, the elderly, female heads ofhouseholds, the
homeless, large families, service workers and public employees, and farm workers. The housing
needs ofeach ofthese groups are evaluated below for the purpose of identi$ing appropriate
program assistance.
Disabled: The group documented in the 1990 census whose housing needs are most likely not to
be met by the nursing facilities already provided in Burlingame are the residents with no work
disability but with a mobility and self care problem. In 1990 there were 534 such city residents;
ofthese 301 were between 16 and 64 year ofage and 233 were over 65 years ofage.
The 1990 census also provides some profile ofthe disabled residents in the city; and those
residents most likely to be disabled are our elders. In 1990, 2,177 (8.1%) city residents were
sufficiently disabled that they could not work and 842 (3.1%) had a disability that impaired their
mobility. Of these two groups 60% (1,313) of those who were sufficiently disabled that they
could not work were over 65 and 83% (703) of those with a mobility impairment were over 65.
Between 1990 and 2000, Burlingame's elder population (65+ years) declined by 880 from 19.2%
to 15.2Yo of the city's population. The 2000 population over 65 in Burlingame is 4,287. Because
ofthis decline in the number ofresidents over 65, using the 1990 numbers as the basis for
quantifuing the care and housing needs of Burlingame's disabled population seems appropriate.
Assuming disabled persons do not live together, the city would need 534 accessible living units
for disabled persons in the work force.
Currently there are 521 nursing home beds in Burlingame, 60 licensed spaces in small group
assisted living facilities, 90 assisted living units in a retirement home, and 371 nursing
home/convalescent care licensed beds. Two ofthese facilities have been built since 1994 and
provide T2licensed beds for Alzheimer patients. These facilities support the needs ofthe city's
more fragile, disabled elderly and younger residents who might need transitional assistance from
the hospital.
Female Heads of Household: The number of female heads of household in Burlingame has
decreased over the last ten years, as has the proportion ofthem with school age children at home.
Census 2000 shows that 7.7%o of the total population are female heads of household (967
households); with 45Vo (436 households) ofthese having children under 18 years of age at home.
City ofBurlingame General PlanH-16
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY
In 1990, female heads of household represented 13.7% of the population (1689 households), and
40% (676) of these had children under l8 years of age living with them.
Even with a reduction in the proportion of the city's population that are female heads of
household, there remains a need to provide suitable housing for these 967 households. However
a priority should be placed on those 436 households with children under 18 living at home.
Large Family Households.'Another group that frequently has difficulty finding housing and
overpays for it is larger families, e.g. households with five or more members. In 1990 there were
666large family households in Burlingame. Of these, 59Yo were homeowners and 4lo/o renters.
Over the decade the city's population grew by 5%.lt is estimated that the number of large family
households increased by the same percentage. This would mean that there were 700 large family
households in the city in 2000. Further projecting owner and renter proportions based on 1990
trends; it is estimated that 413 of these larger families are home owners and287 are renters.
Based on 1990 Census data, it is estimated that23%o of the city's homeowners are overpaying for
housing in 2000; and29o/o of the renters are overpaying. Extrapolating these proportions to large
family households, 95 large family households who own their own homes are over paying for
their housing in 2000. Among renters, 83 large family households who rent in Burlingame in
2000 are overpaying.
Table H-2: Estimated Large Family Households and Large Family Households Overpaying by Tenure in
Burlingame in 2000
Total Households 12,5ll
Overpaying 3,272 (26%)
Owner Occupied Households 5,987
Overpaying 1,400 (23%)
Large Family Owner Occupied
Households
413 (7%)
Overpayingt 95
Renter Occupied Households 6,524
Overpaying 1,874 (29%)
Large Family Renter Households 287 (ts%)
Overpayingz 83
Overpayment estimate is based on proportion of all owner occupied units overpaying projected from 1990 (23%)
Overpayment estimate is based on proportion of all renter occupied units overpaying from 1990 (29%).
Homeless: The Sustainable San Mateo County's Annual Report 2001 estimates that in 1998
there were 4,545 homeless persons in San Mateo County. Of these homeless, 3,694 were adults
and 851 were children. The total number of homeless has not increased significantly since the
1994 count, which totaled 4,499 persons. However, this count does not include "doubled-up"
households: those where potentially homeless persons are living with family or friends. The
report indicates that the number of doubled-up households in San Mateo County has increased
from 613 persons in 1996 to 18,769 persons in 1998.4
2
City of Burlingame H-17 General Plan
DRAFT HO G trI,F',MENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMLINITY
Because the homeless are generally a mobile population, it is difficult to count the number of
homeless by city. The Call Primrose Center in Burlingame, an agency that provides social
service assistance, estimates that tlere are 5 permanent homeless residents in the Burlingame in
2001 . The 1990 Census recorded 2 visible homeless persons in the city. Data from the San Mateo
County Interfaith Hospitality Network, which provides housing for five homeless families with
children on a rotating basis at local churches (three in Burlingame) and whose administrative
headquarters are in Burlingame, indicates th-at the category with the highest risk of homelessness
is female-headed single parent households." They note that the main causes for homelessness
are tle break-up of families and the loss of employment.
There are no permanent homeless shelters for the more mobile single homeless individuals in
Burlingame. However, there is a new north county temporary seasonal shelter for single
homeless that operates from December through March in South San Francisco, approximately
2.5 miles to the nofth of Burlingame. The new facility to open 2001 is located on the grounds of
the San Francisco Intemational Airport and can accommodate 90 homeless individuals a night.
Burlingame contributed $30,000 to the construction of this facility and contributes annually for
its operation.
ln addition the City of Burlingame makes annual contributions to community groups, located
both in Burlingame and elsewhere in the County, which provide services to homeless individuals
and families. In the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the city contributed $2,000 to the Call Primrose
Center, $2,000 to the Shelter Netrvork of San Mateo County, $3,000 to the Samaritan House, and
$7,000 for operating purposes to the north county seasonal shelter.l3
For public service employees the City of Burlingame is a typical example. The median city
employee income is $69,564.rr This is 12l% less than the income needed to afford the median
priced house for sale in 2001 in Burlingame. A survey by the Peninsula Congestion Relief
Alliance Transportation Action Program done in 2000 found that 77o/o of employees of the city
live outside of Burlingame. According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission the
average number ofvehicle miles traveled to work in the San Francisco Bay region in 2000 is
18.7 miles. A total of l9% of the City of Burlingame's employees commute from a distance of 20
miles or farther. Cunently, the City of Burlingame offers financial assistance for employees
City of Burlingame H-18 General Plan
Service llorkers and Public Employees: The major employers in Burlingame are those that rely
heavily on service workers. In the private sector the major employers are: 5 major hotels (1,525
employees), Guittard Chocolate (230 employees), Sky Chefs a food processor (200 employees),
and Coen Company a gas/oil bumer manufacturer (111 employees). In the public sector the
major employers are: Peninsula Hospital a public/private medical center (2,555 employees), the
City of Burlingame (281 employees), and the Burlingame Elementary School District (230
employees). Burlingame also has a community downtown commercial center and two
neighborhood shopping centers that support the city's residents. These areas are populated by
small independent and chain stores, which are dependent on local service workers.
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMML]NITY
using mass hansit to commute. As is true of other public employers in the City, Burlingame does
not offer any housing assistance for employees.
In San Mateo County, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartrnent is 62% more than the
monthly income made by a minimum wage eamer.3'a Based on figures from the Employment
Development Department, workers in the employment categories that form the core of
Burlingame's economy may be eaming an hourly wage that makes them unable to afford
housing. For example, the average annual pay in 1999 for a person employed in the retail trade in
San Mateo County is 526,614. This annual pay places a one-person family in the retail industry
in the very low-income category as defined by HCD. In the services industry, the average annual
income in 1999 was $57,309. This annual pay places a family of four with a single wage earner
in the services industry in the low-income category as defined by HCD. Based on housing costs
in San Mateo County, such a family could only afford to rent the average priced one-bedroom
apartment.
First-time homebuyers in the service and public sectors may be also excluded from the housing
market in San Mateo County because of the high down payment required. A median priced home
in Burlingame would require a 20% down payment of $162,283. San Mateo County offers
several programs for first time home buyers, including a second mortgage loan program
(START) and a mortgage credit certificate program (MCC). rr However, the START program
was initiated in 1994 with first-time funds and is currently inactive until the initial qualifiers
repay enough ofthe loan money to re-open the program. The MCC program requires that the
purchase price ofa home cannot exceed $269,000, where in Burlingame the median price ofa
condominium in 2000 was $382,005.
Housingfor Farm workers:There are no farms in Burlingame. The definition of farming also
includes those working in forestry and wholesale horticultural businesses. While there are no
wholesale horticultural or forestry businesses that employ manual laborers in Burlingame, the
1990 census shows that 1% of the city's residents declared their employment to be associated
with farming, forestry or wholesale horticultural businesses. This low percentage, combined with
the fact that Burlingame has no agricultural lands or farm labor housing within or adjacent to its
incorporated limits, indicates that the number of actual farm workers in Burlingame is very small
and, therefore, no there is no need for farm worker housing.
AT-RISK ASSISTED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
Inventory of At-Risk Units
Section 65583 (a) (8) ofthe State Govemment Code requires an analysis of assisted housing
developments that are eligible because of the expiration of Federal loan limitations to change
from low-income to market rate housing during the next terr years. In Burlingame, there are
currently no locally subsidized units at risk. The one apartment project financed with mortgage
City of Burlingame H-19 General Plan
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMRNT
PROFILE OF THE COMML'NIry
revenue bonds was converted to market rate housing in the 1980's. No additional mortgage
revenue bonds have been issued in the city nor has the city undertaken any other housing
programs that rely on funding which would allow projects to be converted to market rate units in
the future.
PROJECTED HOUSING NEEDS
State law requires that a housing element quantiff existing and projected housing needs for
persons of all income levels within each community, including the community's share of the
regional housing need by income level. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is
responsible for preparing estimates of local and regional housing need for additional units based
on factors prescribed by State Law (Section 65884 or Article 10.6). The factors included in the
division of the regional housing need into individual community assignment are: market demand
for housing, availability of suitable sites and public-facilities, commuting pafferns, housing type
and tenure, and housing needs of farm workers. In addition ABAG looks at regional and local
vacancy rates and at housing values and rents as indicators of market demand. Household
projections are based on employment opportunities, availability of sites and commuting patterns.
Type ofhousing is based on census data and regional projections.
Existing Housing Needs
Existing housing need for the addition of new units to Burlingame's housing stock includes two
factors: (1), the number of additional units needed to replace substandard structures or
substandard living conditions generally marked by overcrowding and overpayment; and (2) the
number of units additional units required in Burlingame to insure the city meets its regional
housing share responsibility.
Substandard Structures
The housing needs assessment documents that while Burlingame is built out at this time and the
city's housing stock is aging, there is a high demand for housing reflected by both the cost and
vacancy rate. The result has been that overall the city's housing stock is well maintained. It is
estimated that since 1994,40o of the single family housing stock has been demolished and
replaced, had a major addition or been significantly maintained (wiring, plumbing, roofing, etc.).
Based on past code enforcements for health and safety, it is estimated that the five year housing
need for replacement of dilapidated and/or unsafe dwellings in Burlingame is 20 units.
Substandard Living Conditions
The housing needs assessment defines the scope of local households in need of housing
assistance in 2000. Since these residents are living in Burlingame not all of these needs can be
met by new residential construction. Moreover, because of the size of these needs, the city must
City of Burlingame H-20 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMLTNITY
establish target numbers for the five year work program. The two major conditions that result in
substandard living conditions and/or life style are overpayment for housing and overcrowding. In
many cases these two are related, since renters who lived alone may need to take in roommates
in order to afford their housing or relatives who cannot afford rent may move in with a
homeowner.
Overpayment: Households overpaying, paying more than 30oZ of their income for housing, are
more difficult to estimate because of the lack of current census data. Based on 1990 data
projected for the increase in households, it is estimated that there were 3,272 households
overpaying for housing in Burlingame in 2000. This represents 26.5% of the city's housing
stock. More than half (1,872) of these households were renters. Among the most economically
challenged ofthese overpaying households are the elderly on fixed incomes. It is estimated in
2000 that there were 172 homeowners over the age of65 and 826 renters over the age of65
overpaying for housing in Burlingame.
Special Needs: Often the households that are overpaying and are overcrowded, include members
of other groups which have special housing needs. The city's housing implementation progmm
should address these specific needs as well. Because of the absence of2000 Census data the
numbers of these households in Burlingame in 2000 have been estimated based on 1990 Census
data. It is estimated that in 2000 there will be 534 households with at lease one disabled member;
700 households with more than 5 persons; and 967 households headed by a single female, 436 of
them with children under the age of 18. Special programs will be needed to address the housing
needs of these groups.
Community Assignment: Regional Housing Share
State law requires that each community consider the housing needs ofpeople ofall income
levels. In addition, State law requires that the regional housing needs should be balanced
throughout the region so that individual communities will not be impacted with relatively high
proportions of lower income housing.
H-21 General Plan
Overcrowding: In 2000 it was estimated that 458 dwelling units were overcrowded in
Burlingame. This represents 3.5% of the city's dwelling units.
ABAG has the responsibility ofprojecting the regional housing needs and identifoing
Burlingame's share for the 2001-2006 period based on the factors identified in State law. The
five year housing need numbers include market rate housing as well as units for those with lower
incomes. The projected need number is the number ofnew dwelling units needed in Burlingame
to insure that the total expected regional household gro*,th's housing need is met. The projected
regional housing need number for the planning period for Burlingame is 565 dwelling units. The
city's obligation includes addressing both space for 565 new units and for units with households
City ofBurlingame
DRAF'T NI,EMENT
PROFILE OF THE COMMI.JNITY
among the 565 with different incomes. Burlingame's housing regional assignment for 2001-2006
by income category is:
Table H-3 - Pro ected Need Income
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, letter ABAG Executive Certification of the Regional Housing
Needs Determination (RHND) Appeal Process and Final RHND Allocation, March 23,2001.
The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has developed an income
formula for determining eligibility for Federally funded housing projects. These same standards
are used by the State of California and ABAG for determining householder income for below
market rate housing. The eligibility categories are defined by percentage the family earns
(adjusted by family size) of the median income in the county where they reside. The median
income in San Mateo County for 2000 is $74,900. Households earning less than the county
median income are determined to be eligible for housing assistance. The income limits for
eligibility for 2000 are presented by number of persons per household.
Table H-4 - Federal Income Limits
*Median Income standard is based on a family of four.
Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HIJD) limits for income categories for low and very
low income households, FY 2000 limits on March 9, 2000.
The income standard includes the requirement that households whose incomes are below the
county median should not pay more than 30 percent of their incomes for housing. In areas like
San Mateo County, where housing prices have been inflating over the past decade or more,
finding safe and sanitary housing units within the reach of individuals and families whose
incomes are below the median is difficult; and overpayment is an important issue in
Burlingame's housing market.
No. Units PercentIncome Category
t9ll0Very Low
l056Low
t57 28Moderate
242 43Above Moderate (market rate)
565 100Total Current need
75Average Yearly Need
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Very Low Income 26,200 29,950 33.700 37,450 40,450 43,450 46,450 49,450
Lower Income 40,800 46,650 52,500 58,300 63,000 67,650 72,300 77,000
Median Income 52,450 59,900 67,400 74,900r,80,900 86,900 92,900 98,850
Moderate Income 62,950 71,900 80,900 89,900 97.100 104,300 I I1,500 I18,650
City of Burlingame H-22 General Plan
DRAFT HO (l F',I,[',MF,NT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
CONSTRAINTS TO DEVELOPMENT
Governmental Constraints
1. Land Use Regulations
General Plan: Burlingame's General Plan contains nine elements including all seven mandated
by the State. The General Plan establishes land uses and land use densities for the City of
Burlingame. A spectrum ofuses is found in Burlingame, ranging from residential to industrial.
Each land use identified in the General Plan corresponds with a zoning diskict which implements
that land use and establishes criteria for the development ofthe use. Residential densities and
corresponding zoning designations are as follows: single family uses (up to 8 dwelling units per
acre) R- 1 ; medium density (duplex at 9 to 20 units per acre) R-2; medium high (21 to 50 units
per acre); and high density (51 plus units per acre) R-4.
There are two commercial land uses that allow residential uses above the ground floor, those are
the uses designated as shopping and service and service and special sales. The implementing
zoning districts for these land uses are the C- 1 and C-2 zoring districts respectively. Residential
group care facilities for the elderly are allowed in the C-l and C-2 districts, as well as the R-4
and C-3 zoning districts. These areas are located near major transportation corridors in the City
and are ideal locations for high-density housing.
Zoning Ordinance; The City of Burlingame has a zoning ordinance that sets forth requirements
that can affect the type, appearance and cost ofhousing built in Burlingame. The zoning
ordinance sets the standards for lot size, use, lot coverage, floor area ratio, setbacks, height, open
o Burlingame's zoning regulations and development fees are comparable to other
communities on the Peninsula.
E Because of our location at the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside
agencies have come to play an increasing role which increases both processing times and
conskuction costs.
E Because communities on the Peninsula are substantially built out, land and construction
costs drive up the cost ofhousing.
tr The city has been aggressive in implementing local conservation and recycling legislation
as well as disseminating information on energy conservation programs offered by other
agencies.
Key Findings:
City of Burlingame H-23 General Plan
DR r.T TIOITSINC F',I ,E',MRNT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
space and parking. In Burlingame, there are four residential zoning districts and five commercial
zoning districts, two of which allow residential development above commercial uses, and one
which has been specifically created as a mixed use zoning district (C-R), allowing all multi-
family residential or mixed commercial/residential use. The three commercial zoning districts
which allow mixed use are close to the City's major transportation corridors, encouraging
residential development in these locations.
The minimum lot size in Burlingame is 5,000 square feet. There are some areas in the City,
mostly hillside areas, where the minimum lot size is 7,000 and 10,000 square feet. There are also
some nonconforming 3,000 and 4,000 square foot parcels in the City's older subdivisions. The
lot coverage allowed for single-family development is 40o/o; and 50olo coverage is allowed for
multiple family development. Lot coverage on corner lots in R-3 and R-4 zoning districts is
increased to 60Yo. Side setbacks requirements are based upon lot width ranging from 4 to 7 feet,
and are required for all residential developments. The minimum front and rear setback
requirement is 15 feet. Private and shared open space are required only for residential
condominium developments. These requirements are on a per unit basis, with 75 square feet of
private open space required per unit, and 100 square feet of common open space required per
unit. Floor area ratio pertains only to single-family projects. Floor area ratio is based on a
formula that varies by lot size, and takes into account the location of the lot (interior or corner),
and the type ofgarage (attached or detached).
Unlike other cities in San Mateo County, over half of Burlingame's housing stock is multi-
family units. The densities of the multi-family units vary from 20 units per acre, to over 50 units
per acre. Except for the addition of residential condominium requirements for multiple family
units in the 1970's, the zoning regulations for multi-unit developments have not changed much
over the years. There is no design review required for multi-family dwellings.
Burlingame does not have density limits (units per acre) established by zoning in the residential
zoning districts. The number of parking spaces that can be accommodated on a site is the
ultimate determination of the maximum number of units on a multiple family zoned lot. The
parking requirement in Burlingame is based upon the number of bedrooms, per unit. There is one
and one-half spaces required for each studio or one-bedroom unit; two parking spaces required
for a two bedroom unit; two and one-half spaces required for a three or more bedroom unit.
Guest parking is required only for multiple family condominium projects, the number of spaces
required is based upon the project size and can be taken from the required parking. Thus parking
is one of the major limiting factors in developing high-density housing in Burlingame. Often
parking in below grade structures is used to increase the dwelling unit densities in multi-family
developments. The Code allows group residential facilities for the elderly to be built with25oh of
the required parking per unit. There are currently no provisions for reduced parking for multi-
family development near mass transit.
H-24 General PlanCity ofBurlingame
DRAFT HOUSIN G EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
The height limit for residential structures in the R-l and R-2 zoning districts is two and one-half
stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. The R-3 zoning district has a height limit of four stories or
55 feet and the R4 zoning district is six stories or 75 feet in height. A conditional use permit is
required for any multiple family structure over 35 feet in height. This height review also pertains
to structures in the C-l and C-2 zoning districts. At the north end of the City near the new BART
station in Millbrae, there is an aviation easement imposed by ttre FAA and SFO Airport. The
maximum height in this area is limited to 60 feet for air traffic safety.
A second unit amnesty program has recently been adopted by the City Council to legalize
existing second units on single family zoned (R-l) lots. The program was adopted for two years,
until June 7 , 2003 . Burlingame first adopted a zoning code in 1 92 I when second units were
allowed on R-l zoned lots. In January 1954, R-l district regulations were revised to allow only
one dwelling on an R-l zoned lot. Many of the second units were built during the housing crisis
associated with World War II. The program seeks to retain these existing units as a legal part of
Burlingame's housing stock. They are usually smaller, more affordable units that are ideal for
single or elderly people with limited incomes. The intent of the program is also to make these
units safe and sanitary for current and future tenants. In order for a second unit to qualifu for the
amnesty program it must meet certain criteria, including being able to conform to the
requirements of the California Health and Safety Code. The amnesty process is primarily
administrative and includes an inspection by the Building Inspector and notification to neighbors
within 100 feet of the property. Appeals are resolved by the Planning Commission. If all the
criteria are met and no appeals are filed, the unit is granted armesty. With the $ant of amnesty
for a second unit, some limitations are placed on the property: including future expansion of the
second unit and a requirement that one of the two units on-site is owner occupied.
Single Family Residential Design Review: ln 1998 the City Council adopted Ordinance 1602
implementing design. review for second story additions, new construction and first floor
additions which involve substantial construction in the R-l zoning district; design review is
based on compliance with five design criteria. The intent ofthe guidelines is to preserve the
original and unique pattems ofthe distinct residential neighborhoods in Burlingame. There is no
design review for multiple family residential projects.
2. Building Codes
The City of Burlingame applies the 1998 Califomia Building Code (CBC) and Califomia Fire
Code (CFC) to review minimum health and safety standards for residential and commercial
construction projects. There are local amendments that require more restrictive standards for
certain items. The local amendments that apply to housing include a requirement for the
installation of automatic fire sprinkler in all residential developments larger than 5,000 square
feet in area and for structures taller than three stories. For all structures, residential included, all
storm water roof drainage must be collected and conveyed to the public storm water system.
There are seismic standards applied, and extra engineering may be required for structures in the
City ofBurlingame H-25 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
hillside areas. Because Building and Fire Code standards are established for life safety reasons, it
is not reasonable to consider not complying with the Code in order to reduce housing costs.
Burlingame enforces energy conservation standards enacted by the State. The standards may
increase initial construction costs, but will reduce household costs over the long term by
reducing energy costs.
Burlingame has one code enforcement officer. Most of the code enforcement in Burlingame is
complaint driven, but there is some active enforcement initiated by the code enforcement officer
based upon observation. It is unlikely that the code enforcement in Burlingame would have a
negative impact on the long term affordability of the City's housing stock.
3. NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Requirements
Burlingame is located at the foot and along the east side of the coastal ridge between the Pacific
Ocean and San Francisco Bay. Four creeks drain the area directly into San Francisco Bay. For
these reasons, runoff and water quality are important considerations in development and
construction. The Clean Water Act of 1972 prohibits the discharge of stormwater into United
States waters unless the discharge is in compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES). To meet its mandate from the State, the City of Burlingame, has
joined with the other cities in San Mateo County, to obtain a regional discharge permit from the
State Water Quality Control Board (SWQCB) for stormwater water discharge. In order to reduce
non-point pollution sources, each construction project is required to implement "best
management practices" on job sites to minimize erosion, stop contaminated run-off and control
construction site pollution. NPDES requirements also encourage site planning including swales,
detention ponds and other design elements that can be incorporated into project design to reduce
storm water run-off and contamination. The City of Burlingame requires all stormwater run-off
to be collected and channeled into a public storm water system. It is expected that with the City's
permit renewal in 2003, there will be more restrictions on private developers during construction
to include residential development. These new requirements may increase the cost and timing of
construction.
The impact of the current requirements will require additional site planning, post construction
controls and maintenance that will likely result in additional time and expense to developers.
4. On and Off-Site Improvements
On and off-site improvements also add to the cost of development projects, and are usually
required before a building permit can be signed off for occupancy of a structure. Residential
developments in the City of Burlingame are required to meet City standards for curb cuts, which
is a width not exceeding2l% of the lot dimension or 16 feet for a two-car garage. As stated
above, all storm water roof drainage must be collected and conveyed to the public storm water
City of Burlingame H-26 General Plan
D F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
system. Sewer laterals are required to be tested upon sale and replaced all the way from the
house to the City clean out for all new residential buildings. For residential projects, the City's
urban reforestation ordinance requires that one landscape tree be planted on-site for each 1,000
square feet offloor area. For properties along El Camino Real (State Route 82), sidewalk and
curb cut changes require Caltrans approval.
5. Environmental Requirements
Burlingame is mandated to follow the procedures set forth in tle California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). Since two square miles of the City is under San Francisco Bay water, the
City has a substantial bay edge. Four creeks drain the coastal range to the bay thrcugh the City.
Sites that have unusual topography and/or sensitive habitat may require in-depth review and
special studies to evaluate the environmental impacts ofa proposed project. This can add
additional costs to a project. Residential properties containing a creek that are proposing
significant alterations or culverting ofa creek are also required to obtain approval from the
Califomia Departrnent of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
Potential development sites with sensitive habits, endangered species, or significant environment
problems are generally not recommended sites for affordable housing. For example, steeply
sloping sites in the Burlingame Hills that may be available for housing would be quite expensive
to develop because ofgeotechnical problems.
6. Fees and Exactions
The costs involved with development in the City of Burlingame include planning and building
plan check and permit fees; utility service fees, school fees and a recycling fee. The City does
not have park dedication fees or bedroom tax, as do many cities.
It has been the policy ofthe City Council to subsidize the Planning permit process to encourage
residents to apply for and receive permits before they begin construction. As a result
Burlingame's planning processing fees remain among the lowest in San Mateo County.
City ofBurlingame H-27 Geleral PIan
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Planning Fees: The Planning Department fees required for residential development include the
following:
Table H-5 -
Source: Burlingame Planning Department, 2001
Burlingame's Planning Department is not funded by fees, rather by general funds. The cost of
planning is subsidized in Burlingame, with the fees collected for projects not nearly covering the
cost of staff time to process such projects. A comparison of residential planning fees from other
cites in San Mateo County is listed below.
Table H-6 -fees for other cities in San Mateo
Fees
Application Type T.oning District Fee
Desigl Review Fee R-l districts only $200
Desiga Review Deposit R-l districts only $500
Variances R-l and R-2 $ 100
Variances all other districts sl50
Special Permits all districts $200
Conditional Uses all districts $200
Rezoning all districts $200
Minor Modification &
Hillside Area Permit
all districts $100
Initial Study all districts $s0
Categorical Exemption all districts $25
Negative Declaration all districts $ 100
Negative Declaration
With Responsible
Agency
all disticts $s00
Condominium Permit residential disnicts
all other districts
$ r00
$150
Public Noticing R-l and R-2 districts
all other districts
$3s
$60
Environmental Impact
Report
all districts $ 7,500
deposit
Design Review Variance Conditional Uses Initial Study Negative
Declaration
Belmont s2,537 $2,536 $2,536 s2,097 $795 (mitigated
130% ofcost of
contract)
Burlinqame $200 + $500 deposit sl00 $200 s50 $100
Daly City $800 $300 + $100
per acre
$300 + g199 p..
acre
st45 $350 or actual cost
+ 25% overhead
Foster City $150 + fee based upon
scope ofwork
$200 $200 $ l2s $125 or actual cost
Millbrae new constr $750 +
supplemental cost (min
$32 l.5o)
room add $540 +
supplemental cost (min
of$230)
$335 $335 $87 $332 + 105% of
actual cosV $2,150
+ l05o/o of actual
cost
City of Burlingame H-28 General Plan
b
-
t
b
-
-
-
DRAF'T E',I ,F',MRNT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Design Review Variance Conditional Uses Initial Study Negative
Declaration
Redwood City $50 (l-3 units)
$250 + $25lunit
$400 new
res.
$200 res alt
$400 N/A $1,500
San Bruno s425 $600 $s00 $18.7s s400
San Carlos $545 new construction
$55 minor alt
s545 $630 N/A $1,135
San Mateo $1,909 $218 $218 $1,909 +
consultant fees
$1,909 + consultant
fees
South San
Francisco
$215 s38s s350 $100 +
consultant fees
$75 + consultant
fees
Source: Burlingame Planning Department, 2001
Building Fees: Building permit fees are charged on a sliding scale that is based upon the
valuation of the project, plus plan check fees. The estimated valuation of a project is checked
against a minimum valuation of $102.18' per square foot for residential development. The basic
plan check fee is 65% of the building permit fee. The energy plan check fee (when applicable) is
an additional 25yo of the building permit fee. The basic fee for electrical, plumbing and
mechanical permits is $25 dollars, with additional fees charged on a line item basis.
Recycling Fees: Ordinance No. 1645 was adopted in December 2000, by the Burlingame City
Council in order to meet the goals of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989,
which requires all California cities and counties to divert 50% of waste they generate away from
landfills. The City's recycling ordinance requires that600/o (by weight) of all waste generated
from demolition and new construction be reused and/or recycled, and that a minimum of 25% of
structural material (excluding concrete, asphalt and dirt) must be recycled.
Prior to permitting, applicants must complete a recycling and waste reduction form, then a City
employee makes a site visit to veriff the estimated waste anticipated to be generated by the
project. The applicant is then required to pay a deposit at the rate of $50 per ton of waste
generated. For example, if a project is estimated to generate l0 tons of debris, the deposit would
be ($50 X 10 tons) $500, and 5 tons is required to be recycled. All recycling, reuse and disposal
must be documented by receipts, weight tags or other records. If the recycling goal is met, the
full deposit is refunded, however if the recycling goal is not met only a proportionate amount of
the deposit will be returned. Some waste materials can be sold by the developer to offset his/her
additional cost of removal caused by recycling.
Public Worlcs: Public Works fees associated with housing development typically include sewer
connection fees which are $143 for a single family dwelling or duplex and $109 per unit for
multi-family structures. Water meter and service connection fees can range from $1,050 to
$2,575 depending on the size of the service and meter required. Sidewalk and special
I The basis for valuations are set annually utilizing building valuation date published in "Building Standard"
magazine, the offrcial publication of the International Conference of Building Officials.
City of Burlingame H-29 General Plan
DR F'T HOI ISINC Ti',I,F',MI,NT
HOUSING DEYELOPMENT ISSUES
encroachment fees are $10 for properties in the R-l and R-2 zoning districts and $50 for multi-
family zoning districts. Fees for street frontage improvements conrmonly associated with
housing development, including sidewalk, curb, gutter and curb drain modifications, are $25 for
changes to 150 square feet or less.
School Fees: Two school districts serve Burlingame: the Burlingame Elementary School District
and the San Mateo Union High School Disrict. School fees are collected to offset costs of
rehabilitation and maintenance ofschool buildings, with 60% ofthe fees collected going to the
elementary school district and 40% to the high school district. Fees are collected on all new
construction projects and residential remodels in Burlingame that add 500 square feet or more.
Residential school development fees for three stories or less are $ 1.93 per square foot, and
commercial and residential project greater than three stores are charged $ .31 per square foot.
7. Process and Permitting Procedures
Planning Process
Single Family Construction
Burlingame adopted interim single family residential design review guidelines in 1998 for new
single family construction and second story additions in the R-l zoning district. The process was
revised slightly to include first floor additions involving substantial construction and to expedite
processing times, and was made permanent in April 2000. The intent ofthe guidelines is to
preserve the original and unique pattems ofdistinct neighborhoods through consistency of
character in individual homes to allow protection of each homeowner's investment when future
projects are initiated. The process requires that all qualifuing projects go before the planning
commission in a design review study meeting, with notice to all neighbors within 300 feet. The
project is either refened to a design review consultant or the project is moved forward on the
Planning Commission calendar for action. The Planning Commission action is appealable to City
Council. The average processing time for a project that is not refened to a design review
consultant is 56 days. Approximately 26% of the projects requiring design review are sent to a
design review consultant. The average processing time for these projects is approximately 162
days. These average processing times include "out of court" time in which the applicant is
revising drawings. Design review does not apply to duplex or multiple family residential
development.
In addition to design review, applicants may request exceptions to the zoning code in the form of
variances, conditional use and special permits. A variance is generally a measurable standard,
such as parking space dimension or front setback dimension. Special permits and conditional use
permits are more discretionary.
The average processing times for these types ofapplications is about 8 to 10 weeks (56 to 70
calendar days). This time line is generally driven by legal noticing requirements and planning
City ofBurlingame H-30 GeneEl Plan
DRAF'T HOI]SING ,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Commission hearing availability. The Burlingame Planning Commission meets the second and
fourth Monday of each month. All applications require two meetings before the Commission;
one for design review study and one for action. Three weeks is added to the review time if a
decision is alpealed to the City Council because of the requirements to comply with the Ralph
M. Brown Act provisions.
There are two administrative processes in Burlingame: minor modifications and hillside area
construction permits. Minor modifications are similar to variances, but are for minor
encroachments beyond the established development regulations. For example, you may seek a
minor modification rather than a variance for a 1 foot extension into the required side yard. In the
hillside areas of the City, any construction requires a hillside area construction permit. The intent
of this process is to allow opportunity to review construction for its affect on existing distant
views from inside structures on nearby properties. Administrative permits are noticed to
immediate neighbors (within 100 feet). If there are no appeals within 7 days, the permit is issued
administrativeiy. If a neighbor wishes to appeal the project it moves on to full review with a
public hearing Lefore thePlanning Commission. An administrative permit review which is not
appealed takes about 16 days.
Multiple Family Construction
Residential Condominium permits: All proposals for condominiums, residential or commercial,
require a condominium permit. The Planning Commission and City Council must approve the
proi..t based on the following criteria: conformity with zoning regulations and General Plan
iensities, its effect on surrounding community, impact on schools, parks, public utilities, streets,
traffic, and submittal of legal tentative parcel map approved by the City Engineer. Condominium
projects must also meet certain development criteria such as common and private open space, as
well as greater setbacks than is required for apartments.
Apartment Development: lf anapartment project meets all zoning code requirements, the process
can be ministerial and will only require review by the Planning Commission if environmental
review is also required. There are no requirements for common and private open space in
apartment projects.
The California Environmental Quality Act allows categorical exemptions for projects involving
four or less units, and for larger infrll projects which meet certain criteria. For those larger
developments which do not meet the infill criteria, the environmental review process may add
time to development projects, as discussed above.
plan Check: The City of Burlingame offers a parallel plan check process which allows applicants
by their choice to submit construction plans to the Building Department while they are
simultaneously going through the zoning review process. The intent of providing this option to
the public is to &pedite the review process. However, there is a risk involved with this process
City of Burlingame H-31 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSIN G NI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
in that plan drawings and engineering and structural calculations may be required to be redone
should the action ofthe Planning Commission cause a substantial change to the project.
Additional plan check fees are charged for revised plans. There is a 7 day performance standard
for Planning Departrnent review ofbuilding permit applications.
Public Wortrs: Since Burlingame operates its own wastewater heafinent plant, and it must meet
the operating requirements of the San Francisco Region Water Quality Control Board, it is a part
ofthe City's permit that a sewer lateral test be completed prior to the sale ofa house that is 25
years old or older and before renovations occur where 2 or more plumbing fixtures are added.
Typically these tests cost $20, in addition to any repairs or line replacement required.
Non-Governmental Constraints
1. Environmental
Geotechnical/Norse.' The topography in Burlingame goes from the waters of San Francisco Bay
to the coastal range foothills. Four creeks drain from the coastal range, through the City, to the
bay. In Burlingame the face of the coastal range is divided into large-lot single-family dwellings.
Due to the steep slopes and shallow underground streams, some areas are lulnerable to land
slides during the wet weatler. The hillside area is divided into larger lots (10,000 SF minimum).
Developments on these lots require additional seismic and structural engineering features. The
flat land areas in Burlingame are subject to a high water table and, in some areas to short term
flooding. These constraints increase the cost ofbuilding housing in some areas'
Certain areas of the City are also subject to high noise levels. These areas include sites close to
US 101, the Cal Train rail line, and areas subject to over flight from planes departing San
Francisco Intemational Airport. A larger area ofthe flat land and upward sloping area at the
north end of the City are also subject to back blasts (low frequency) noise from departing
airplanes. Housing development in these areas will require noise mitigation, which also adds to
increased housing costs.
2. Land and Construction Costs
Housing and land costs within San Mateo County have dramatically increased since the mid
1990's. This is due in large part to the rapid growth ofhigh+echnology businesses in the Bay
Area region, particularly on the San Francisco Peninsula. The increase in the employment and
housing demand has been more dramatic than anytime in the past twenty years, with housing
costs rising much faster than household income levels. Until recently, the cost of land has
steadily increased, with a l5olo price increase from 1999 to 2000. However with the loss ofjobs
since January 2001 in the high+ech sector, it is forecast that sales price growth in the Bay Area
will slow to 3Yo to 4Vo' this year.
2 Marcus & Millichap, news release April 30, 2001
City ofBurlingame H-32 General Plan
D r.T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
In general lots are small in Burlingame with the typical lot between 5000 and 6000 SF. There are
fewer than 30 acres of vacant undeveloped land in the City, and most new development will
occur by re-use of already developed land. It has become common practice to see proposals that
include the demolition of a single family dwelling and reconstruction of a larger single family
dwelling on the lot. Lots with old dilapidated structures have been sold in the last year for as
much as $680,000, with the intention of demolishing the structure and building a new single
family dwelling. Many of these proposals are made by developers who intend to market these
homes on the high-end real estate market. The sale price ofthese speculative homes commonly
exceeds the million dollar mark. Due to the scarcity of vacant lots in Burlingame there has been a
net gain of two single family dwellings in the City of Burlingame between 1994-2001.
The largest increase in residential units has been in the multi-family zoned areas. Between 1994
and 1999, l15 multi-family units were added to the City's housing stock. Forty percent ofthese
new multi-unit developments were on parcels that previously contained single family dwellings.
The cost of construction for residential development has dramatically increased since the mid
1990's as well. The economic boom in the technology industry sparked a large demand for office
space in the Bay Area in the late 1990's. The demand for general contractors as well as
subcontractors became so $eat, that many people with residential projects had a hard time
finding and retaining contractors. This drove the cost of construction up significantly, for both
single family and multi-family development. Building construction costs are estimated by the
Building Department to be $102.183 per square foot for single family residential development.
3. Financing and Affordability
The median price for a condominium in San Mateo County in 2000 was $360,000, an increase of
80% over the 1991 price of$200,000. The median price for a single family detached home in
San Mateo County in 2000 was $600,000. The average price for a single family detached home
in Burlingame in 2000 was 8l 1,418, and in 1990, the average cost was $302,516. This represents
a 149Yo increase in the average home price since 1990. Rents increased 957o since 1991 when
the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in San Mateo County was $1,000, and in 2001 it is
now $1,950. The median household incomes for San Mateo County increased 61% since 1990,
from $46,438 to $74,900.
Assuming a 20% down payment, a $811,418 home financed for 30 years al7.l4%oa would
require a monthly payment of approximately $4,374, and an annual household income of about
$233,000. According to census data the median household income for San Mateo County in 2000
was $74,900.
I The basis for valuations are set annually utilizing building valuation date published in "Building Standard"
magazine, the ollicial publication ofthe Intemational Conference ofBuilding Officials.
a Califomia Association ofRealtors, July 25,2001
City ofBurlingame H-33 General Plan
DR F'T HOTISING RI,RMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
In San Mateo County "affordable" housing is defined as that with a contract rent or price
affordable to low and moderate income households, based upon: rent not exceeding 30% of
monthly income and monthly mortgage payment not exceeding33% of gross monthly income.
In the second quarter of 2001 sales activity of homes has slpped, however the median home
price in the Bay Area is still increasing, but at a slower rate). The home sales and rental market
are both normalizing after experiencing extreme growth in the past several years. Although
mortgage rates have dropped significantly from 8.29% in June 2000 to 7.14% in June 2001 for
fixed 30-year mortgage and from 7.24% in June 2000 to 5.80% in June 2001 for an adjustable
mortgageo, because of the high house prices ownership is still out of reach for most County
residents.
Housing Funding Opportunities
Because the City's population is less than 50,000, Burlingame does not receive Federal housing
assistance money (Block Grant/CDBG) directly. However, the City does have an administrative
agreement with San Mateo County, which is the recipient of the CDBG finds for the
unincorporated county and all the jurisdictions too small to receive Block Grant funds directly.
Although the City of Burlingame does not offer assistance directly to first time homebuyers; the
City does participate with the County consortium in a Community Development Block Grant
program funded by the Federal Government, which provides some first time homebuyer
programs.
The San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development is the lead agency for
the Consortium. San Mateo County HOME Consortium receives federal block grants from
which they fund housing projects. The Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is one
of the more active loan programs operating in the county. The participating cities, along with the
unincorporated area of the County compete for funding from this grant. The local jurisdiction in
which a project is funded, must match 25%o of the Federal funds. Projects seeking funding from
the block grant must complete a request for proposal (RFP) that is reviewed by the HOME
Program Review Commiffee that formulates recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The
Board of Supervisors makes the final decision on which projects are to be funded.
The other main programs operating in the County are the START program and the Mortgagee
Credit Certificate Program (MCC). The START program began in 1994 with 3 million dollars
from the County General Fund and another 2 million from a HUD grant. It is a second mortgage
loan program that will provide a loan for up to 25Yo of the purchase price, not to exceed
$286,100 or $35,000, whichever is less, at a 3o/o interest rate for 30 years. There are no
5 Califomia Association of Realtors, July 25,2001
6 California Association of Realtors, July 25,2001
City of Burlingame H-34 General Plan
-
E'T Irr|ITSIN( T',I ,F',MRNT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
payments or accrued interest for the first five years. These funds were loaned out to 125
purchasers that met the program requirements. All original funding has been exhausted and the
program is now awaiting additional funding. The maximum income of applicants for this
program can not exceed 120% of the median income (moderate income).
Another County program for first time homebuyers is the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
(MCC). This program is a tax credit certificate that is issued by San Mateo County Department
of Housing and Community Development to eligible homebuyers. The certificate allows a tax
credit equal to l5%o of the annual mortgage interest paid on a home loan, with the remaining 85%
of the mortgage interest still eligible to be taken as an itemized deduction. With this benefit, new
homeowners may wish to adjust their Federal tax withholdings, resulting in more spendable
income each month. In order to qualiff for this program, applicant's total gross household
income cannot exceed $57,600 for a 1 or 2 person household, and$66,240 for a 3 or more person
household. The purchase price can not exceed $269,500 for an existing dwelling or $369,100 for
a newly constructed dwelling. Due to the high cost of housing in Burlingame, it may be difficult
to find a property that would meet the criteria for the above stated programs.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission has recently created a planning grant program
called Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC). New residential development withint/tto
%mile of transit terminals is targeted with this program. Planning grants are available under this
program to provide funding for small-scale transportation projects such as streetscapes and
pedestrian, transit and bicycle oriented improvements for compact housing developments to help
revitalize local communities. MTC offers up to $75,000 per project, however a local match is
required for the planning work.
Human Investment Project for Housing (HIP) is a non-profrt organization located in San Mateo
County that has programs to assist people with special needs, either from income or
circumstance, to live independent, self-sufficient lives in decent, safe, low cost housing. HIP
Housing has a homesharing program which provides matches for home providers and home
seeker who will pay rent, as well as home seekers who agree to provide services in lieu of paying
rent. The property development program works with local jurisdictions to identi$/, acquire, and
rehabilitate existing multi-family properties in order to expand the availability of affordable
housing and upgrade and maintain existing affordable housing. The home equity conversion
program provides loans and educational counseling to older homeowners to help them make use
of the equity in their home without requiring them to move.
There are several other grants and low interest loan opportunities that are available for housing
rehabilitation, construction, acquisition, and preservation in the City of Burlingame. Many of
these funds are accessed through the County Office of Housing and Community Development,
like the HOME program described above. An example of some of the other programs that
Burlingame residents could qualiff for include; CalHome Program California Indian Assistance
Program (CIAP), California Self-Help Housing Program (CSHHP), Downtown Rebound
Planning Grants Program, Economic Development/Jobs-Housing Balance Program, Emergency
City of Burlingame H-35 General Plan
r.T HOIISING F',I,F"MF:,NT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Housing Assistance Program (EHAP), Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program (FESG), and
Multifamily Housing Program (MHP). Appendix C provides additional information on housing
funding in San Mateo County.
ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES
It is a requirement of every housing element to include a section on residential energy
conservation opportunities. Since the deregulation of energy companies in 1998, the price of
energy has skyrocketed. Vfith such an increase in prices, energy costs can be a substantial
portion of housing costs. Effective energy conservation measures built into or added to existing
housing can help residents manage their housing costs over time and keep lower income
households affordably housed. There are a number of programs offered by the City of
Burlingame, the local energy provider (PG&E) and the State of California, which provide cost-
effective energy saving programs.
Energy Programs Offered by the City of Burlingame
Primary Programs:
o All new residential and nonresidential construction in the City must abide by the State of
California's residential building standards for energy efficiency (Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code). Title 24 Standards were established in 1978 to insure that all-new
construction meets a minimum level of energy effrciency standards. Since their
establishment, it is estimated that Title 24 Standards along with standards for energy efficient
appliances have saved Califomians more than $15.8 billion in electricity and natural gas
costs.
o The City's zoningordinances do not discourage the installation of solar energy systems and
other natural heating and cooling opportunities.
o The City's Public Works department is recommending that City Council adopt a resolution
authorizing a grant application for the innovative peak load reduction program funded though
the California Energy Commission. In addition the City is using the services of the State's
Energy Partnership Program to identi$ areas of electricity reduction.
Secondary Programs:
o The City of Burlingame implemented a tree preservation and reforestation ordinance in July
1998. Part of the ordinance requires that when additions are made or new residences are
built, property owners shall plant one (1) landscape tree for every 1,000 square of lot
coverage or habitable space for single family homes or duplexes; and one (l) landscape tree
for every 2,000 square feet of lot coverage for apartment houses and condominiums. In
addition, the ordinance provides for the protection of the larger, existing trees in the City.
With the proper siting of trees to allow sun exposure in the winter and shade in the summer, a
homeowner can save np to 25Yo of a household's energy consumption for heating and
cooling. Computer models devised by the U.S. Department of Energy predict that the proper
H-36 General PlanCity of Burlingame
DRAF'T HOIiSING EI,EMRNT
a
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
placement of only three trees will save an average household between $100 to $250 in energy
costs annually.
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District is encouraging cities to adopt an ordinance
which would allow only pellet-fueled wood heaterso an EPA certified wood heater, or a
fireplace certified by the EPA should the EPA develop a fireplace certification program for
installation of any woodburning appliance. The use of properly regulated woodburning
appliances would decrease the amount of natural gas and electricity required to heat homes in
the City while preserving the region's air quality.
The City of Burlingame adopted an ordinance requiring the recycling and salvaging of
construction and demolition materials. Not only will this reduce the amount of materials
going to landfills, but it will also conserye energy through the reuse and recycling of these
materials. The Steel Recycling Institute reports that steel recycling, the number one recycled
material in the U.S., saves enough energy to electrically power the equivalent of 18 million
homes for a year.
Local Energy Supplier (PG&E)
The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) supplies all of the electric and gas needs to the
residents of Burlingame. PG&E offers an assortment of programs that provide residents with the
opportunity for energy conservation. The following are some programs that are available to
residents of Burlingame, including programs for residents who qualiff as low income.
Programs Available to All Residents:
o 1-2-3 Cashback - A PG&E residential progmm that offers free suggestions on energy
savings tips, low-cost home improvement projects and investments you can make to save
energy in the future.
o Residential Aooliance Rebate - PG&E offers rebates to homeowners who purchase an
Energy-Star appliance. This program includes the purchase of an Energy-Star refrigerator,
clothes washer/dryer, dishwasher, air conditioner, prograrnmable thermostat and heating and
cooling equipment. The amount of the rebate varies from appliance to appliance.
o Residential Contractor Program - PG&E's residential contractor program makes available to
both contractors and homeowners cost-saving vouchers. The vouchers aid in the purchase of
energy efficient home improvements. Rebates range from $30 - $750 depending on the
voucher.
o 20120 Energy Rebate - Residential customers who reduce their Summer 2001 electricity load
by 20% are eligible for a20Yo credit on their bill.
o Enersv Efficient Mortqaqe - This Drosram allows residents to make improvements that
increase the energy efficiency of their home and finance these improvements through their
mortgage.
City of Burlingame H-37 General Plan
a
NRAF'T HOIISING ,RMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Miscellaneous Programs - PG&E also offers rebates for the purchase and installation of
compact fluorescent lights, Energy Star floor lamps, hardwired indoor fluorescent fixtures,
hardwired outdoor fluorescent fixfures, motion sensors, gas water heaters, electric water
heaters, programmable thermostats and whole house fans. All of which are available for
purchase through PG&E.
Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes:
o Energy Partners Program - PG&E's free weatherization program available to low income
customers. Qualified, pre-screened contractors make weatherization repairs and
improvements for residents who qualiff for the program.
o CARE (California Alternate Rates for Energy) - PG&E's discount program for low income
households and housing facilities. The CARE program provides a20o/o discount to low-
income residents meeting certain standards. It also insures that low income residents are not
affected by new surcharges. The CARE program is broken into five categories:
1. CARE Residential Single Family Program
2. CARE Sub-Metered Tenant Program
3. CAREfor Qualified Nonprofit Group Livtng Faciltties
4. CAREfor Qualified Agricultural Employee Housing Facilities
5. CARE Education and Outreach
o REACH (Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help) - The REACH program is
a one-time energy assistance program sponsored by PG&E and administered by the
Salvation Army to assist low income customers particularly the elderly, disabled, sick,
working poor or unemployed, in paying for their energy needs.
o Strategic Alliance Project - The Strategic Alliance Project examines community, regulatory
and political issues affecting PG&E's low income customers and works with community
organizations to determine how these clients can benefit from their programs.
The State Of California
California Energt Commission Rebate Programs: Open to all residents of California,
independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding.
Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable
ene.gy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell
poweiedgeneration systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics
powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50o/o of the system cost
(whichever is less).
Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for
the installaiion of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal
a
City of Burlingame H-38 General Plan
a
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed
generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system.
Programsfor Residents Wrho Qualify with Low Incomes:o LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is
funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic
type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to
help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them
more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components.l. The Weatherization Program
2. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP)
3. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP)
Cost-effective energy conservation measures are an affordable and appropriate way for residents
to lower both the monthly cost of housing and the cost of their energy bills. There is a wide
assortment of programs accessible to all residents of Burlingame through a variety of local and
state sponsored programs. The City of Burlingame has prepared an informational packet
available to residents highlighting the energy conservation programs available to them.
Califurnia Energt Commission Rebate Programs: Open to all residents of California,
independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding.
a
a
Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable
energy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell
powered generation systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics
powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50o/o of the system cost
(whichever is less).
Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for
the installation of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal
combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed
generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system.
Programs for Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes:o LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energ), Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is
funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic
type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to
help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them
more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components.
4. The Weatherization Program
5. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP)
6. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP)
City of Burlingame H-39 General Plan
DRAF'T EI,EMENT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Cost-effective energy conservation measures are an affordable and appropriate way for residents
to lower both the monthly cost of housing and the cost of their energy bills. There is a wide
assortment of programs accessible to all residents of Burlingame through a variety of local and
state sponsored programs. The City of Burlingame has prepared an informational packet
available to residents highlighting the energy conservation programs available to them.
City of Burlingame H-40 General Plan
DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
EVALUATION OF THE
1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
One of the purposes of preparing a housing element is to provide the community with a way to
track their success in meeting the objective of the adopted work program. We can learn from our
successes and develop more effective programs or stronger efforts in the areas where we were
not a s successful as we hoped. The following is a brief summary of the objectives we laid out in
the 1994 Housing Element work program and our community accomplishments.
Goal A: Preserve residential character by encouraging maintenance, improvement and
rehabilitation of the city's neighborhoods and housing stock.
Objective Stable, safe and attractive neighborhoods.
- Implemented residential design review to continue the consistency of
single family residential blocks and neighborhoods (1998)
- Invested $23.7 million in public facilities improvements throughout the
city over the planning period, includes street repair and traffrc control,
water distribution system, sewer collection system, storm drainage
collection system, sidewalk repair and maintenance.
Objective: Maintenance of existing affordable housing and reduction of
overcrowding.
- Six property owners qualiff for subsidized Rehabilitation Loans for
structural maintenance and/or to eliminate overcrowding. (achieved 6,
work programtarget25)
Key Findings:
tr Successes of the 1994 Housing Element include:. Implementation of Second Unit Amnesty Program;. Success of Residential Design Review Program; and. Implementation of Residential Overlay Zones.
tr These successful progmms are being used as a basis for the 2001-2006 work program:r Expansion of the Second Unit Amnesty Program;. Increased opportunities for Residential Overlay zoning and rezoning of selected sites;
and. Build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing providers.
City of Burlingame H-41 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
Objective: Retain rental units in order to avoid depleting supply of needed rental units
- No existing multiple family rental units were converted to residential
condominiums. Added 3lmulti-family rental units during the planning
period, first build since 1984.
Objective: Retain portions of the housing stock in danger of being converted to non-
residential use.
- No parcels occupied by residential uses were converted to commercial use
during the planning period.
- One commercial building was removed and replaced with 20 market rate
residential condominiums; a commercial zoned lot was developed with 4
market rate condominiums.
Obiective: Ensure affordabiliw of existins units.
- Made permanent city agreement with San Mateo county for administration
of Community Development Block Grant funding to make resources
available to Burlingame residents permanently.
- No rehabilitation funds were granted to multiple family property owners in
Burlingame during the planning period (achieved 0, work program target
20 units).
Objective: Determine Code compliance. structural deficiencies.
- Continued to devote staff time to assisting with property research by
realtors and property owners.
- Did not establish building inspection for a fee program, no public interest.
- Hired a part-time code enforcement officer who has resolved 400 cases
since he was hired (1998).
Objective: Regulate factors such as bulk. light. and air to achieve neighborhood
compatibility with new constnrction.
- Initiated single family residential design review and approved 207 new
(replacement) or remodeled single family residences (April 1998-1999).
Goal B: Provide variety and choice of housing by promoting housing opportunities for all
persons regardless of age, sex, race, color, marital status, disability, national
origin or other barriers.
Objective: Public awareness of anti-discrimination laws and policies.
- Code enforcement officer work refers 3 to 4 calls a month to La Raza
Central Legal, a nonprofit community law center in San Francisco which
works with local tenant to resolve landlord/tenant issues (1998).
City of Burlingame H-42 General Plan
F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
- The city assists financially the Peninsula Conflict resolution Service, a
local non-profit group, which now provides assistance to Burlingame
residents at no charge (1998).
Goal C: Encourage special purpose housing.
Objective:-Increase affordability for 50 elderly households (achieved 26. target 50).
Units provided under the Second Dwelling Unit Amnesty Program
enacted June 2001 will be available to senior citizens. (achieved 0)
Rental assisted dwelling units for the elderly using Section 8 Rent
Subsidy. (achieved 11, 9 very low income, 2 low income).
Developed a public information handout identiffing senior services,
maintained annually through the Parks and Recreation Department; Senior
Resources Handbook: An Information guidefor Burlingame Senior
Citizens.
City contributed $67,460 during the planning period to local and county
non-profit agencies which assist senior citizens.
Helped 15 elderly be more affordably housed: The Human Investment
Project for Housing (HIP) found shared housing for 15 households,T very
low income, 3 low income, 5 moderate. (1999)
Developer built a 48 bed convalescent care facility with Alzheimer
treatment capability.
Objective Improve livabilitv of housing units for all residents. including l0 disabled
accessible units.
City did not accomplish this program during the planning period .
(achieved 0, target 10), although did enforce all requirements of Building
Code for accessibility throughout the Planning period.
26 disabled persons received Section 8 rental assistance in Burlingame
(21 very low income; 6 low income)
Objective: Add l0 affordable housing units for single parent households.
- In 1999, l6 low income single heads of households received Section 8
rental assistance in Burlingame. (achieved 16, target l0)
Objective Affordable housing for all residents. including 50 studio or one-bedroom
units for single occupants.
Placed an overlay zone in transit corridor to encourage high density
residential development over commercial area bounded by Murchison-
California Drive-rear of the properties fronting Dufferin-El Camino Real.
City of Burlingame H-43 General Plan
F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
Correction and maintenance of an older multi-family building which
resulted in the addition of one affordable low-income unit managed by
Shelter Network (achieved l, target 50)
Objective: Provide local share of support for county-wide homeless problem.
- Annual contributions totaling $126,210 during the planning period (1994-
1999) to support local and counfiide agencies who serve the homeless.
- City contributed $30,000 toward construction of a new North San Mateo
County Homeless Shelter for Single Adults on a county owned parcel in
South San Francisco.
- Interfaith Hospitality Network day center and in Burlingame three of nine
participating churches provide temporary shelter for five families with
children. (achieved 5, target unstated)
Goal D: Reduce residential energy use to conserve energy and help reduce housing costs.
Objective: Incorporate energy conservation in all new and substantially rehabilitated
residential construction.
- During the planning period the Building Division issued 4,681building
permits, all construction where it was required was inspected for
compliance with Title 24 energy conservation.
- Adopted an Urban Reforestation Ordinance which protects existing
substantial tree and requires all new development and major remodeling to
plant trees substantial enough to achieve benefits of shading. (1998)
Objective: Community awareness of conservation benefits.
- Adopted ordinance which places limitations on exterior illumination on
residential and commercial properties throughout the community. Has
affected all new development and major remodels with exterior
illumination since I 996.
Goal E: Achieve increased affordability of housing.
Objective:Stimulate development of housing by promoting at least 60 units per year
(20 market rate units and 40 affordable units) betrveen 1oo4 and 2000.
Status of sites identified for affordable housing in the 1994
Housing Element (achieved 20, target 60)
a. Adjoining parcels at El Camino Real and Trousdale: rezoned with
high density residential overlay. (achieved 20 market rate, target
7s)
City of Burlingame H-44 General Plan
F'T HOIISING F],I,F],MF],NT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
Residential development over parking Murchison and California;
rezoned with high density residential overlay (achieved 0, target
50)
Interior parcel Trousdale-Ogden-Murchison-Magnolia, group
facility for the elderly (achieved 0, target 150)
California Drive between Juanita and Broadway: (achieved 0,
target 100)
Use air-rights over public parking lots along Donnelly and between
Howard and Bayswater (achieved 0, target none)
Corner Highland and Howard Avenues: single resident occupancy.
(achieved 0, target 40)
An additional60 multiple family housing units and 2 single family
homes on new sites were built on infill sites not identified in the
1994 Housing Element
Objective: Foster development by becoming proactive in contact with property
owners and knowledge of site potential.
- Staff assisted in facilitating the development of 115 new multiple family
dwellings, accomplished design review of 207 new (replacement) or
remodeled single family houses and2 single family homes on new sites.
- To provide better service to applicants and customers added two planning
staff positions during the planning period.
Objective: Identiff sites for small, no frills SRO's.
- No additional sites for single residence occupancy were identified. The
one identified in the element was not developed with SRO units.
Objective: To include approximately 250 currently illegal and non-conforming
accessory housing units as legitimate portions of the City's affordable
housing stock.
- In May 2001 city created a two year arnnesty program for second dwelling
units in the single family zone built before 1954 (Ord. 1653). (achieved 0,
target 250)
Objective: To expand by 50 units the stock of affordable housing to help meet
housing needs.
- Interfaith Hospitality Network located its new temporary housing for
homeless families with children program in Burlingame. (achieved 5,
target 50)
Objective: Obtain a share of the estimated 300 units to be assisted by the first-time
buyer program (Mortgage Credit Certificate).
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
City of Burlingame H-45 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM
No Burlingame residents received such assistance during the planning
period (achieved 0, target 15)
Table H-7 - Quantilied Summary of 1994 Housing Element: Dwelling Units Provided by Income Category 1994
1999
*Since all new development is on infill sites, new development replaces existing units, these numbers reflect the net
increase in dwelling units.
**Fifty-five households received public assistance through the Section 8 program (41 very low income, 12 low
income and 2 moderate income).
*Number of affordable housing units conserved includes the following:
Section 8 55 (includes 4l very low, 12 low, and 2 moderate income)
Shared Housing 15 (7 very low, 3 low, 5 moderate income)
t994
Unmet
Local
Tareet
1994
ABAG
Unmet
tr'air
Share
ABAG
Fair
Share
1994
Tarset
New Construction
(net new units)*
Rehabilitation Conservation*Total
Income
Category
Local
Tarset
Achieved Local
Tarset
Achieved Local
Tarset
Achieved Local
Target
Achieved
4g,i,r 235 48 187 223VeryLow27114000095
90 0 55 6 250 l5'r'l 395 2l 374 210Low231
278Moderate28500l00l57**25 7 l8
40 324 0 246Above
Moderate
570 40 tt7 207
(des. rev)
70 695 400 s79 957Total1357270tt7652r3360
City of Burlingame H-46 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
COMMUNITY RESOIJRCES
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
LAND INVENTORY AND SITE IDENTIFICATION
State law requires that local governments identiff sufficient vacant or underdeveloped land to
accommodate the community's housing needs. One of the primary ways to do this is the
identification oflands suitable for future residential development. This identification should
include review ofvacant sites and sites that have potential for reuse or whose use could be
intensified for residential use. An important factor in suitability ofsites for housing is the
relationship of the identified sites to appropriate zoning, public facilities and services.
Public Owned Properties
There are 101 publicly owned properties in Burlingame. This includes land owned by the City,
hospitals and school districts. Most ofthese properties currently are developed with public
facilities, such as schools, parking lots, libraries, hospitals, parks and City corporation yards and
water tanks and pump stations. There are some very small "leftover" parcels, such as public
easements and street rights-of-way. None ofthe left over parcels have area of sufficient size to
support residential development.
tr Burlingame began as a "transit village" focused at the Burlingame train station.
tr Since Burlingame is primarily built out, new housing opportunities will have to replace
existing development.
tr Sites identified for residential reuse generally follow the transit village pattern with sites
identified:. North end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae.. Near the Broadway and Burlingame train stations.
tr Transition areas are also identified to improve compatibility between residential areas and
other land uses:. Near Burlingame Avenue Commercial District. Along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield. East side of Carolan Avenue south of North Park Apartments
D Incentives are proposed for new development that encourages affordable housing and are
near transit hubs.
o Because of recent improvements to public facilities in the north end of Burlingame, there is
adequate capacity to accommodate new development proposed.
Key Findings:
City ofBurlingame H-47 General Plan
VACANT PARCELS
DR HOUSING ELEMENT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
Private Properties Which Are Now Vacant
There are about 100 privately owned, vacant properties in Burlingame. Of these, 25 properties
are in the bayfront arca; an area which is not planned for residential uses, and where there are no
support services and facilities for residential uses, such as schools, libraries and shopping
centers. For this reason, these sites have been eliminated from consideration. Within the area
developed with single family houses, there are about 15 isolated "infill lots" each about 5000 SF.
Generally these are part of presently developed double and triple lots. The single lots will not
become available until the structure on the combined lots is removed.
The few undeveloped public and private owned properties judged to have significant
development potential are included in the following analysis.
PROPERTIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DEYELOPMENT
Two types of properties have been included in this general category. The first includes
underdeveloped or vacant properties zoned for high density residential use. An inventory of these
properties, along with an estimated buildout capacity, is included in Table H-2. The second
category includes properties in areas that are now zoned and often developed for commercial
use, but with the potential for rezoning or adding a residential overlay zone and have future
residential development potential. In addition to proposing rezoning programs for these sites, it is
proposed that zoning code changes be implemented which would offer incentives for building
affordable housing and incentives for building more housing within one-third mile of the three
transportation hubs. A description of the actions to be taken to achieve these goals is at the end
of this chapter.
Vacant Or Underused Sites Now Zoned For Residential Use
There are a number of sites already zoned for residential use where the potential has not been
used. All three of these parcels are within the area bounded by Murchison and Dufferin between
El Camino Real and Califomia Drive. This office commercial area was rezoned with an R-4
overlay as part of the 1994 Housing Element work program. Since 1994, one office building was
removed and the 1.24 acre site has been developed with a 2O-unit residential condominium and a
48-bed residential care facility for the elderly. All of these sites are within one-half mile of the
Millbrae BART Station now under construction and because of proximity to a transit terminal
would warrant special provisions for higher residential density such as reduced parking
requirements and increased height. All development of sites in this area is subject to Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) approval for height.
tr 1800 Et Camino Real - There are 3 vacant parcels under one ownership with a total of 0.90
acres zoned C-1, with a multiple family residential overlay zone. Development on this site
will be affected by the fact that two sides are adjacent to a parcel developed with a large
nursing facility.
City of Burlingame H-48 General Plan
DRAF"T HclIISING tr"I,EMF"NT
COMMUNIry RESOURCES
tr 1875 California Drive - This corner site is about 1/3 ofan acre and is developed with a car
wash. The site is also zoned C-l with a multiple family residential overlay zone, and is
within one-third mile of the proposed Millbrae BART station.
o 1870 El Camino Real - This is a 0.78 acre site now developed with an older two-story, 24'
tall offrce building. The site is adjacent to the car wash site noted above. The office building
was built in the 1970's and does not have adequate parking to serve its needs. Redevelopment
ofthe site is also constrained by some existing access easements to parking which serves
adjacent office buildings to the south. The site has potential for high density residential use.
The site is within one-third mile of the Millbrae BART station now under construction.
Source: Burlirgame Planning Department, 2001
Area z,one Description Assumptions # Units
Site I c-t/R4
Overlay
1800 El Camino Real
3 vacant parcels under one ownership with a
total of 0.9 acres with a multifamily
residential overlay zone.
. s-story, 60' in height. 66 unia/acre. includes affordable density
bonus (15% ofunits)
60
Site 2 c-l/R4
Overlay
1875 Califomia Drive
Comer site with a total of 0.33 acres with a
multifamily residential overlay zone, within
one-third mile of the proposed Millbrae
BART station.
. 5-story, 60' in height
. 86 unitVacre
. efliciency units with decreased
parking requirement of one
parking space per unit ifall
units affordable
28
Site 3 RC
4
I 1870 El Camino Real
Parcel with a total of0.78 acres with a
multifamily residential overlay zone
fronting on El Camino Real and California
Drive, within one-third mile ofthe proposed
Millbrae BART station.
. s-story, 60' in height
. 65 unitVacre. includes affordable density
bonus (15% ofunits)
5l
Site 4 c-l/R-4
Overlay
One additional office site in existing
overlay zone about % acre.
E{fi ciency units (500-600
SF each) reduced parking
requirement ofone space per
unit ifall units affordable to
very low and low income
86 units/acre
43
Total # ofUnits:182
City ofBurlingame H-49 General Plan
Table H-8 - Vacant or Underused Sites
Overlay
DRAF'T HOI ISING EI,EMENT
L
ts
L
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
SELECTED SITES NOW ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USE
These sites have been selected for potential reuse because they are either close to a transit hub or
offer an opporhrnity for beffer transition between existing commercial and residential areas.
Those sites that are near transit hubs would be considered for higher densities, while those in
hansition areas would need to be designed to fit into the existing adjacent development.
Transit Oriented Development
Burlingame began as a small grouping of commercial buildings around our train stations
supported by apartments and single family development within walking distance. Over the years
the City's growth radiated from these core areas. There are three transit terminals serving
Burlingame: the Burlingame Train Station, the Millbrae train station and the BART/train station
in Millbrae. Today, the land within one-third to one-half mile of our transit stations is fully
developed, so any new residential development would involve reuse in the area. A number of
sites have been identified with easy access to the existing transportation centers and corridors
serving the City. All of these sites are within one-third to one-half mile of a station.
O Along California Drive near Broadway: This area is now zoned C-2, and consists of a
variety of commercial uses including office and retail. It is located less than one-fourth mile
from the Broadway Caltrain station and therefore has good pedestrian access and potential
for transit oriented development. However, these are small parcels (ranging in size from 3800
SF to 9600 SF) and will not yield many units unless they are consolidated into larger parcels
for development.
tr C-3 zoned area north and west of Peninsula Hospital: This area is now zoned C-3, which
allows office development for medical and financial businesses. Residential uses are
generally considered to be compatible with office uses, since the hours of operation of the
office uses are generally the same hours that people are away from home at work and school
and there is little activity at office sites on evening and weekends. In this area, there are
several areas which have some vacant land with potential for residential use. The C-3 zone is
unique because the current zoning regulations required the existing office buildings to meet
residential setbacks.
1764Marco Polo Way - This 1.13 acre parcel is now zoned for professional office uses,
is owned by Poplar Recare, a nonprofit organization that houses their childrens services
and adult day care programs at this site. They are considering relocation of their
children's services facilities to another site and could provide housing on this site in
conjunction with their adult day care program. The property across the street on Marco
Polo Way is now zoned for and developed in multiple family residential uses.
1777 Murchison Drive - This is a vacant 1.3 acre piece of land at the center of the block
accessed across the Buddhist Association administrative offrces site on Murchison which
is zoned for professional office use.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
T
City of Burlingame H-50 General Plan
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
Since this area already contains a mix of commercial and residential uses, it is a good
location to consider livdwork units and mixed uses. It is recommended that zoning code
changes he made to allow live/work units and to olfer viable standards for their
construction.
This area may not yield a lot of new housing units. The parcels in this area are typical small
lots, most are fifty feet wide by about 120 feet deep, which could accommodate 3 to 4 units
at most. Unless parcels are consolidated, it will be difficult to gain too many more units.
There are two parcels along Highland Avenue that are adjacent to the "Auto Row" overlay
zone (Subarea D), and are now used for automobile storage for auto sales businesses on Auto
Row. These parcels are larger than most in the area, and could accommodate about 35 units
each. It is proposed that a density bonus be offered for sites in this area that are combined.
u Rollins Road south of Bloomfield Road: This area is now zoned R-3 (multiple family
residential), with an overlay that limits development to one unit per 2000 SF of land area
(equivalent to 21 units per acre). This area acts as a transition area between State Route 101
(the Bayshore Freeway) and the single family homes immediately to the east. The area could
support higher densities and still maintain its transition function by including design
considerations to make additional units compatible with the adjoining single family homes. A
new overlay zone was applied in 2000 along Rollins Road north of this area which allows
higher densities, provides a density bonus for lot combination, but limits the height to two
stories, not to exceed 30' in height and limits density without the bonus to one unit per 1500
SF of land area (equivalent to 29 units per acre). This same concept could be applied to this
area. Most parcels are 50'wide and less than 6000 SF in area, and now contain duplexes.
With this change, each site could support up to 4 units, and still have features which are
compatible with the adjacent single family homes. However, if lots are combined, there
would be more opportunity to build a project with both more units and on-site amenities such
as common open space.
O East side of Carolan next to North Park Apartments: This area consists of four parcels
totaling 5.38 acres, now zoned C-2. The primary existing use is auto related businesses. This
is a pocket of commercial development located between two residential areas and is within
walking distance (less than one-half mile) from the Broadway Caltrain station. The location
between the high density residential North Park Apartments (developed at 43 units per acre)
and the single family neighborhood (fronting on Toyon Drive) to the south offers an
opportunity to provide a more suitable transition between the two residential areas. It is
proposed that the northern 3.35 acres be rezoned to the R-4 zone district and developed at a
density of 43 units per acre, comparable to the adjacent North Park apartments. The
remaining 2.03 acres adjacent to the existing single family R-1 lots to the south would be
suitable for R-3 zoning restricted to townhouse development, with a limitation on density and
height to provide a good transition between the high density use and the single family houses
fronting on Toyon Drive.
H-53 General PlanCity of Burlingame
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
Table H-10 - Transition Areas
Area Zone Description Assumptions # Units
Area I R-3 Rollins Road South of
Bloomfield
Transition area between SR
l0l and the single family
homes to the east. Area is
zoned R-3 with an overlay that
limits development to I
unit/2000 SF of land area.
. Extend Rollins Road multiple family subzone
from Bloomfield Road to Burlingame Avenue.. Density will be increased from one dwelling
unit/2000 SF of land to one dwelling unit/I500
SF of land.. 30o of lots will be combined into two lots.
These lots would be developed at one unit per
1500 SF of land + one unit for combined lot.. Remaining lots at 2l units/acre. 2-story height limit
46
Area2 c-2 East side of Carolan next to
North Park Apartments
Four parcels totaling 5.38
acres located between two
residential areas and less than
%mile from the Broadway
train station.
, 3.346 acre parcel would require rezone to R-4. 3-story, 35' in height
. 43 units/acre. includes affordable density bonus ( I 5% of units)
t44
. 2.034 acre parcel would be rezoned to R-3
Townhouse
. 20 units/acre. 2-story max. height within 40' of south property
line; garages facing north property line; front
entrances facing south property line
4t
Area 3 c-l Area south of Burlingame
Avenue (Subarea C)
. 3-story, 35' in height. 35 units/acre for parcels over 20,000 SF. smaller parcels can add 3-6 units per lot, bonus
for combined lots.
. would require rezone to R-4 residential overlay
zone
' one 0.8 acre site to accommodate efficiency
units -one parking space per unit if all units
affordable to very low and low income. excellent opportunity for live/work units
50
70
Total # of Units:351
City of Burlingame H-55 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ETEMENT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
ACTTONS REQUTRED/ZONING CHANGES
Some of these areas already have zoning in place to achieve new residential development. In
order to make the remaining areas available for residential development and to improve the
opportunities on existing residential sites, the following actions are required.
Rezoning from C-l to Multiple Family R-3 and R-4
The property south of North Park Apartments requires rezoning from C-l to R-3 and R-4 to
create a priority for residential use and to make the sites available for residential use.
Create an R-3 Overlay zone
The C-l and C-3 zoned property in the area bounded by El Camino Real, the Peninsula Hospital
Property, Marco Polo Way and Murchison Drive would need to have a residential overlay zone
applied in order to facilitate residential development of vacant and underused parcels. The
overlay zone approach would allow the existing office and commercial uses to remain, but would
add the opportunity for high density residential development which would match the height and
mass of the office buildings already in this area close to mass transit.
Create an R-4 Overlay zone
The area south of Burlingame Avenue now zoned C-l would need an R-4 residential overlay
zone. There are other R-4 zoned properties in the area, and this zoning would be compatible with
these and the surrounding area. Using the overlay approach, some of the existing commercial and
office uses which support the downtown commercial center could also comfortably remain.
Amend The Zoning Code To Offer Incentives For Affordable Housing And Transit
Oriented Development
In areas near a transit hub, zoning code changes would be considered to:. provide incentives for affordable housing;. provide for reduced parking and increased height for development within one-third mile of a
transportation hub; and. provide incentives such as reduced parking requirement for efficiency units if all units are
affordable.. amend the zoning code regulations to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed
use projects.
City of Burlingame H-56 General Plan
DRAF'T HOT]SING EI,EMENT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
Table H-11 - Estimated Potential for Selected Sites
very
Low
Low Mod Above Mod Total # Units
Vacant or Underused Sites
1800 El Camino Real 2 I 6 51 60
1875 California Drive 19 9 0 0 28
1870 El Camino Real 1 I 5 44 5l
Site 4 29 t4 0 0 43
Subtotal:51 25 11 95 182
Transit Oriented Sites
1764Marco Polo Way 0 0 56 0 56
1777 Murchison Drive I I 8 55 65
1825 Magnolia Drive I I 7 59 70
Along California Dr
North of Broadway
0 0 50 0 50
Subtotal:))123 tt4 241
Transition Areas
Rollins Rd. South of
Bloomfield
2 I 4 39 46
East side of Carolan
next to Northpark
7 4 t7 157 l8s
Area south of
Burlingame Avenue
49 24 4 43 120
Subtotal:58 29 25 239 351
Total:111 56 159 448 774
Regional Housing
Need
110 56 157 242 565
City of Burlingame H-57 General Plan
NR F'T HOIISING EI,NMRNT
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
PUBLIC FACILITY CAPACITY
The City of Burlingame is almost built out and public facilities in place are adequate to serve
existing and proposed development. There are two public improvement projects which have been
completed in the last l0 years which have removcd any constraints to new residential
development, particularly at the north end of the city. Many of the sites identified are located in
the northern portion of the City.
Sewer Treatment Plant Improvements
In 1994, major improvements were made to the City's wastewater treatment plant facilities. As a
result of these upgrades, the capacity of the plant was increased to accommodate the ultimate
population anticipated in the City's General Plan. According to estimates made by the
Association of Bay Area Governments, Burlingame's General Plan buildout would accommodate
an additional 817 housing units above what is shown to exist Burlingame by Census 2000.
Therefore, there is adequate capacity at the wastewater treatment to handle the projected 565
units proposed.
Sewer Interceptor Project
In 1998, the Public Works Department completed a major sewer interceptor project which
included installation of new sewer collection main along California Drive from the City's north
boundary to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. This project improved the capacity of the sewer
collection system and provided sufficient capacity for development in the north end of
Burlingame, including all the sites selected north of peninsula Hospital.
City of Burlingame H-58 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
COMMUNITY OPPORTTINITIES
C OMMUNITY OPPORTUI{ITIE S
Since 1994 the residents and City Council of Burlingame have worked hard and achieved many
of the implementing action programs set out in the 1994 Housing Element. In some cases time
and opportunity thwarted the accomplishment of some programs. Over the past eight years
circumstances facing the city and its residents have also changed. In this section the focus is on
the particular successes of the 1994 Housing Element which should be carried forward, the
lessons to be learned from the action programs not achieved, and the changing circumstances
which will affect the City's housing opportunities and programs in the coming planning period.
Key Programmatic Accomplishments of the 1994 Housing Element
Burlingame's 1994 Housing Element action program was divided by planning goals. The premise
was that the residents, Council and staff would work together identifying and implementing
action programs to create opportunity for more housing to assist in meeting the City's share of
California's housing need but also to assist those households with unique housing needs. In
Burlingame these households include the elderly who live on lower or fixed incomes, single
heads of households, and our service and public employees. Because more than half the City's
single family housing stock and neighborhoods were built before 1940, maintenance and
conservation of neighborhood character was a leading issue during the planning period.
O With the location of a new BART station at Burlingame's northern border, new
opportunities to expand on Burlingame's origin as a transit village along the San Francisco
to San Jose rail have emerged since the state and city certified Burlingame's 1994 Housing
Element.
tr During implementation of the 1994 Housing Element effective housing progftrms emerged
in the areas of neighborhood and housing stock maintenance (residential design review),
affordable housing (second unit amnesty) and mixed use overlay zoning (shift of land uses
from older commercial uses to high density residential).tr The 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is built on these successes:. legislative incentives to build housing and affordable units;. continue existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability
such as second unit amnesty and design review;. continue code enforcement;
' staff training for making matches between development and funding options and
facilitating compliance with other agencies to reduce development time; and. build on successful partnerships with non-profit providers.
Key Findings:
City of Burlingame H-59 General Plan
DR AF'T HrlITSIN(i F',I,RMENT
COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES
Among the most effective new programs developed and implemented during the planning period
to meet these regional and community needs were:
O Single family residential design review which places an emphasis on structural and
neighborhood conservation and maintenance;
tr Second Unit Amnesty which encourages the retention and maintenance as lower cost housing
of second units built before 1954 on single family lots;
tr High density residential overlay zoning on older, now marginally developed commercial land
to facilitate these private property owners to change to residential uses;
tr Established a code enforcement officer position to assist in property maintenance issues and
broker tenant/owner disputes;
tr Participated in and funded the city's proportional share of a new north San Mateo County
homeless shelter for single adults;
tr Approved use permits for a day center and emergency shelters at local churches to participate
in and on going program of emergency housing and support assistance for five homeless
families;
O Enacted urban reforestation and exterior illumination regulations which support local goals
for energy conservation.
Building on these programs, over the planning period the City added 117 dwelling units,
rehabilitated2l3 dwelling units and conserved as affordable housing 70 dwelling units. The
numbers of households added and affected may be below our 1994 Housing Element targets; but
during the planning period the city laid more ground work for maintaining the City's residential
qualify and supporting affordable housing than with any other Housing Element implementation
program. The 2001-2006 Housing Element will build on and expand on this legislative base and
implementation experience.
Changed Circumstances
During the 1994 Housing Element program period a regional decision was made to extend the
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system further down the San Francisco Peninsula and to San
Francisco International Airport. Implementation of this decision brought the last station on the
BART line to the southern border of Millbrae, and 1200 feet of tail track into Burlingame. The
end of the line station, including a CalTrain cross platforrn, now lies within a third of a mile of
an area of Burlingame now developed with older office buildings and the immediate area's
largest hospital, Mills-Peninsula. A recent decision has been made to reconstruct the hospital on
its same site for seismic compliance within the next five to ten years. Not only is the hospital a
major community facility, it is a major employer of service workers, many with lower incomes.
Clearly there is now a need for and incentive to build more housing for families and individuals
with a range of incomes at the north end of Burlingame.
City of Burlingame H-60 General Plan
DRAFTHOUSING ELEMENT
COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES
Existing circumstances continue and affect local planning. Because Burlingame is built out and
two of the City's five square miles of area are under San Francisco Bay water, the only way to
add housing will be to change land uses or mix residential uses with other existing land uses.
This land use mixing must be done in such a way that desirable residential areas and
neighborhoods are created while preserving the City's economic base so the additional cost of
services for an aging infrastructure and for expanded services to new housing can be met through
its economic base. The City is undertaking a Specific Area Plan study for the north end of the
city by the new BART facilities, including the adjacent industrial area. A focus of this study is
how to create proper transitions between residential and other land uses, as well as to determine
how to retain a viable industrial area in order to maintain the existing revenue flow and to assist
financially in supporting this new development. The specific area plan will build on and
reinforce, with design suggestions, the siting studies done which will be adopted as a part of the
2001 -2006 Housing Element.
Lessons from the 1994 Housing Element Implementation
The city has learned from the variety of experience implementing the 1994 Housing Element.
The proposed 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is based on the current Housing
Element's successes and reality checks. We have been successful with legislation which provides
incentives for private developers to change land use from commercial to residential using
multiple family overlay zones on commercial properties as well as with incentives to single
family homeowners to maintain their properties and retain older second units. Without a
redevelopment agency or direct government entitlement funds, we have learned that city staff
must work at being informed and build a bridge of information and program linkage between
developers and available assistance. Moreover, as the regulatory programs outside the City's
control multiply and discourage new residential development by increasing its cost, City staff
must be trained to facilitate and communicate. The 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is
built on these lessons. The City's mandate is to facilitate development which implements the
City's planning goals and policies and to maintain the City's services and facilities to meet the
standards of regulatory agencies and residents needs so that new residential development can be
accommodated. The private sector's mandate is to build new residential units within the
established goals and policies. The Housing Element will provide the link to form a partnership.
The types of programs proposed in the 2001-2006 Housing Element which should succeed
because they build on the success and experience of the 1994 Housing Element are:
tr Rehabilitation through code enforcement;
tr Continuation of Second Unit Amnesty program coupled with participation in county housing
rental rehabilitation programs;
O Residential and neighborhood maintenance through residential design review;
tr Create zoning incentives for transit oriented development with inclusion of affordable units
within 1/3 mile of the City's three transit hubs;
tr Form a partnership with a local non-profit to insure existing and new residential units stay
City of Burlingame H-61 General Plan
DRAF'T HOTISTNG E,I,EMENT
COMMUMry OPPORTUNITIES
affordable;
O Build on successful partnerships with non-profit providers and provide more regulatory
incentives to encourage housing assistance for senior citizens including assistance in
modiffing existing housing for the elderly and disabled;
D Use zoning to provide more incentives for residential uses in mixed use and transition areas,
have zoning in place early to take advantage of opportunities;tr Continuous staff training and encouragement in their role as program facilitator and broker
between funding agencies and private developers.
City of Burlingame H-62 General Plan
DR r.T ITNIISTN(: E'I T']VINNT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
2001 -2006
GOAT,S AND POLICIES
This section of the Housing Element contains the goals and policies that the City of Burlingame
intends to implement to address the housing needs identified in the needs assessment evaluation.
The following section on Action Programs outlines specific actions to be taken to meet the goals
and policies.
GOAL A:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING
MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF
THE CITYIS NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING STOCK.
Policy H(A-l): Protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods.
Policy H(A-2): Continue rehabilitation of structures in poor condition.
Policy H(A-3): Maintain rental opporilnities by discouraging conversion of affordable rental
units to condominiums.
Policy H(A-4):
Policy H(A-5):
Promote programs that protect the City's lower-valued housing stock.
Pursue federal and State funds for the rehabilitation of lower and moderate
income housing.
Policy H(A-6):
Policy H(A-7):
Provide pre-sale inspection upon request.
Consider neighborhood quality when approving new and remodeled
residences.
Key Findings:
o The Housing Element goals and policies compose the description of Burlingame's land
use and development parameters for housing. The action program is the description of the
specific means proposed for implementing these goals and policies in the next planning
period for housing,200l through 2006.
tr A unique aspect of the Housing Element action program is that it establishes quantified
targets for the planning period and establishes a time frame for accomplishing each action.
B The city's accomplishments in terms of action program must be reported to the City
Council and State of California annually. The form for the City's annual progress report to
the City Council and State concludes this section.
City of Burlingame H-63 General Plan
DR AET HOIISING EI,F"MENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL B:PROVIDE VARIETY A}ID CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF
AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS.
Policy H(B-l): Promote equal housing opportunities for all Burlingame residents.
GOAL C:PROVIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES,
TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORIGRS AND OTHERS IN THE
SERVICE INDUSTRY WHO WORI( IN BURLINGAME.
Policy H (C):Inform local public sector and private sector employees about available
housing assistance programs.
Policy H(C-2): Encourage inclusion of affordable dwelling units in multiple-family
residential development.
Policy H(C-3):Encourage public agency partnerships to provide housing, reduce commute
time andfacilitate retention of community based groups like teachers,
public employees, hospital and service sector workers.
GOAL D:
Policy H(D-1):
Policy H(D-2):
Policy H(D-3):
Policy H(D-a):
Policy H(D-5):
GOAL E:
Policy H(E-1):
Policy H(E-2):
ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING.
Provide adequate, affordable housing for the City's elderly.
Encourage alterations to existing structures that improve access for physically
disadvantaged.
Encourage housing opportunities for single-parent families.
Encourage housing opportunities for low income single persons.
Support county-wide program for homeless persons.
REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY
AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
Promote the use of energy conservation in residential construction.
Encourage energy conservation measures in rehabilitation projects.
City of Burlingame H-64 General Plan
DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
GOAL F:
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING.
Policy H(F-l): Improve balance of housing type, tenure and affordability by encouraging
development of the sites and locations listed below to serve the income levels
indicated.
Vacant or Underused Sites:
1800 El Camino Real, 0.9 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay
1875 Califomia Drive, 0.33 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay
1870 El Camino Real,0.78 acre zoned C-ll R-4 overlay
One additional office site,0.5 acre zoned C-1lR-4 overlay
Transit Oriented Sites
1730 Marco Polo Way, vacant 0.9 acre site zoned C-3
1777 Murchison Drive, vacant 1.3 acres zoned C-3
1825 Magnolia Drive, 1.4 acre site zoned C-3
California Drive north of Broadway, zonedC-2
Transition Areas
Rollins Road south of Bloomfield, zoned R-3
East side of Carolan between Cadillac and Toyon, 5.4 acres zonedC-2
Area south of Burlingame Avenue commercial area, zoned C-1
Policy H(F-2): Maintain data base of existing R-3, R-4 and CR zoning districts to remain
aware of the number of additional units that could be developed on "under-
developed" parcels in these areas.
Policy H(F-3): Encourage construction of mixed commercial-residential projects.
Policy H(F-a): Encourage conversion of existing accessory living units to legal, safe and
sanitary housing units.
Policy H(F-5): Encourage non-profit housing corporations to develop affordable housing in
appropriate sites in Burlingame.
Policy H(F-6): Work for expansion of Section 8 program in Burlingame.
Policy H(F7):Encourage participation in the San Mateo County first-time buyer program
(Mortgage Credit Certificate) and other ownership assistance programs.
City of Burlingame H-65 General Plan
F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
ACTION PROGRAM
This Section outlines the programs and actions to be taken to implement the policies listed
above. Some of these are ongoing programs now in place, others will require changes to the
s ordinances and
GOAL A: PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING
MAINTENA}ICE, IMPROVEMENT AI\ID REHABILITATION OF THE CITY'S
ITEIGHBORIIOODS AND HOUSING STOCI(
Five Year Objective:
Continue maintenance programs for
public facilities.
H(A-1)Maintenance of Public Facilities
In residential neighborhoods continue the maintenance
and enhancement of public facilities such as streets,
water supply and drainage by allocations from the
general fund, gas tax revenue and, where appropriate,
conditions of development.
Five Year Objective:
Rehabilitate 20 housing units.
H(A-2)Housing Rehabilitation
Through the City's Code Enforcement Program,
establish a program of contacting owners of structures
that appear to be overcrowded, declining or in need of
repair. Refer property owners to the Rehabilitation Loan
Program administered by San Mateo County to assist
qualified homeowners in making necessary repairs to
structures in need of rehabilitation.
Five Year Objective:
No conversion of existing rental stock
to condominiums
H(A-3)Discourage condominium conversions
Maintain the existing zoning controls which prohibit
conversion of residential rental projects with fewer than
2l units to condominiums, and which contain strict
regulations prohibiting conversion of less than 21 units
to condominiums.
Five Year Objective:
Retain existing rental housing
H(A-4)Prevent conversion of residential units to non-
residential use.
Amend zoning code to require a conditional use permit
for any project where residential units are proposed to be
replaced by non-residential use.
City of Burlingame H-66 General Plan
L
NP
^
FT HTTIISINC F',I,F'M['-NT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL A: PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING
MAINTENATICE, IMPROYEMENT A1YD REHABILITATION OF THE CITYIS
NEIGHBORIIOODS AI\ID HOUSING STOCK.
H(A-S)Ensure affordability of existing units.
Continue the relationship with the County of San Mateo
Department of Housing for administration of Block
Grant funds for housing programs; encourage use of
available programs (such as HOME) to assist non-profit
housing corporations in acquiring, rehabilitating and
managing apartment units for long-term affordability.
Five Year Objective:
Encourage acquisitton and
rehabilitation of 20 apartment units
for long-term affordable housing.
H(A-6)Determine code compliance, structural
deficiencies of existing residences upon sale.
Continue program that assists in research of residential
records upon the request of realtors or potential home
buyers.
Five Year Objective:
Continue assistance to potential home
buyers
H(A-7)Residential design review
Continue implementation of residential design review
and zoning regulations including setbacks, floor area
ratio, declining height; continue implementation of
single family design review guidelines adopted in 1998.
Five Year Objective:
Process 250 applications for
residential design revian
GOAL B: PROVIDE VARIETY AltD CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING
HOUSTNG OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF AGE, SEX,
RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER
BARRIERS.
H(B-l)Public awareness of anti-discrimination laws
and policies.
Continue to fund the Code Enforcement Officer position
and coordination with Planning Department code
enforcement activities; provide information handouts;
inform the public and local realtors about equal housing
laws and recourse available in case of violations; refer
complaints to California Department of Fair
Employment and Housing; refer complaints regarding
discrimination to LaRaza Central Legal, a nonprofit
community law center which works with local tenants to
resolve landlord/tenant issues.
Five Year Objective
Continue referral activities through
Code Enforcement Program
H-67 General PlanCity of Burlingame
DRAF'T EI,EMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL C: PROVIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES,
TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORKERS AND OTHERS rN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY
WHO WORK IN BURLINGAME.
H(C-l)Refer eligible employees to housing assistance
programs.
Train staff about current opportunities; make available
brochures and contact information to eligible residents
who inquire about availability of programs. Refer
eligible residents to CDBG programs administered by
the County Offrce of Housing and Community
Development.
Five Year Objective:
Continue stafftraining and to refer
eligible residents to programs
H(C-2)Provide incentives for developers to include
affordable units in new residential projects
Amend the zoning code to provide opportunities for
density bonuses (through changes in parking
requirements and/or height/bulk restrictions) for
residential projects which include affordable units and
are located within l/3 mile of a transit station. Forge a
partnership with a local non-profit agency to insure the
units remain affordable
Five Year Objective:
Provtde 75 new affordable units at
transit hubs
H(C-i) Encourage public agenqt partnerships to
provide housing, reduce commute time, and
facilitate retention of groups like teachers,
public employees, hospital and service sector
workers.
Contact public agencies to encourage them to include
a provision for housing in any facility expansion
plans; disseminate information about available CDBG
funded programs..
Five Year Objective:
Provide 50 new housing units in the
vicinity of public agency workplaces
and commercial centers.
GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING.
H@-1)Increase affordability for elderly
households.
a. Extend the second unit amnesty program for five
years to allow creation ofaccessible secondary
units for the frail elderly;
b. Continue to allow upon request curbside disabled
accessible parking spaces in single family
neighborhoods
Five Year Objective:
Provide 30 affordable units for the
elderly.
Increase number of Section I units for
elderly by 5 units.
City of Burlingame H-68 General Plan
F'T Hr)ITSIN(: F',I,F"MENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING.
c. Coordinate with San Mateo County Housing
Authority to increase the number of Section 8 units
for Burlingame's elderly population.
d. Continue updating and distributing widely to local
residents the Senior Resources Handbook: An
Informational Guide for B urlingame Senior
Citizens, Their Familtes and Caregivers.
e. Expand incentives for new senior housing by
amending the code to allow reduced parking
requirements for assisted living projects.
f. Continue City financial support to non-profit
agencies which administer housing programs for
seniors (home sharing, reverse mortgage).
Planning staff to work with these agencies to
facilitate implementation of their programs in
Burlingame.
g. Encourage non-profit housing grcups to develop
housing by having adequate Planning staff to
facilitate proj ect processing and environmental
review, and by maintaining the existing incentives
in the zoning regulations for residential facilities
for the elderly.
h. Refer seniors who are homeowners to the Human
Investment Project for Housing Home Sharing
Program, to find eligible tenants to share their
housing.
H(D-2)Improve livability of housing units for
disabled population.
Formulate and consider code changes that would allow
code exceptions to modify housing for elderly and
physically disabled for the duration of their tenancy.
Five Year Objective:
Facilitate use of County assistance and
staffworkwith residents to modify 10
extsting housing units to accommodate
disabled
H(D-3)Add affordable housing units for single-
parent households.
Assign staff to carry out the following actions:
a. Work with the County Housing Authority to
increase the number of Section 8 certificates for
single-parent families.
Five Year Objective:
Increase by 5 the number of Section 8
units for single parent households.
Train staff and refer single parent
households to shared housing program,
IHN or other local assistance providers.
City of Burlingame H-69 General Plan
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMNNT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE IIOUSING.
b. Work with the Human Invesfinent Project for
Housing, a non-profit housing corporation which
administers a home-sharing program which is
available for Burlingame residents. Develop
literature regarding availability of housing
programs; distribute to Burlingame residents.
Continue City funding assistance.
H(D4)Provide affordable studio or one-bedroom
units for single occupants.
a. Expand the multiple family overlay zone to
include the C-3 zoned areas between Murchison
Avenue and Peninsula Hospital and between
Magnolia Avenue and Ogden Drive, and the area
on the east site of Marco Polo Way.
b. Develop revisions to the code to encourage
development of studio and one-unit apartments
with reduced parking requirements when located
within one-third mile of a transit hub or major bus
route.
Five Year Objective:
Provide alfordabl e fficiency hous ing
untts on selected sites:
1875 Califurnia Drive - 28 units
Olfice site in R-4 overlay - 43 units
South of Burlingame Ave. - 70 units
Total: 141 affordable eficiency units
Rezone properties with residential
overlay
Amend code to modify parking
requirements when within a transit hub
area
H@-S)Provide local share of support for county-
wide homeless programs
Continue financial contributions to agencies which
provide service to the homeless population in San
Mateo County; continue to allow group facilities for
the homeless in conjunction with church facilities as a
conditional use; continue to support financially and
work with local and non-profit providers in San Mateo
County to provide homeless shelters county-wide.
Five Year Objective:
Continue Jinancial support of County-
wide programs.
Staff continue to facilitate process
necessary to provide such services tn the
City.
GOAL E: REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERYE ENERGY AND
HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
H@-l)Energy conservation for major residential
construction
In all plan checking for new residential construction
and major additions, apply Title 24 energy
conservation requirements; where possible in planning
developments, require structural and landscaping
design to make use of natural heating and cooling.
Five Year Objective:
Add energt conservationfeatures to 250
residences.
City of Burlingame H-70 General Plan
DRAF'T HOt F"I,EMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL E: REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY AND
HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
H@-2)Community awareness of conservation
benefits
Distribute brochure on available energy conservation
programs and measures at the Planning counter to all
residents planning to expand or build new residences.
Five Year Objective
Provide energ) conservation
information to public.
GOAL F:ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFO RDABILITY OF H o USING.
Promote development of at least772
units (448 market rate units and 111
very low income, 56 low income and
157 moderate income units) between
2001 and 2006.
Five Year ObjectiveH(F-l)Encourage development of housing on
selected sites to serve all income levels
Encourage housing development by making sure
zoning is in place, amending zoning code requirements
to provide incentives for affordable/transit oriented
housing (by reducing parking requirements/changing
height and bulk restrictions); and fast tracking zoning
and building permit processing for housing
applications on the following sites:
Vacant and Underused Sites:
1800 El Camino Real - 0.9 acre, zoned C-l/R4 Overlay
1875 Califomia Drive - 0.33 acre, zoned C-l/R-4 Overlay
1870 El Camino Real - 0.78 acre, zoned C-llR-4 Overlay
Site 4 - additional 0.5 acre zoned C-l/R-4 Overlay
Transit Oriented Sites now Commercial
1730 Marco Polo Way - 0.9 acre zoned C-3
1777 Murchison Drive - 1.3 acres zoned C-3
1825 Magnolia Drive - I .40 acre parcel zoned C-3
Area along California Drive - North of Broadway zonedC'2
Transition Areas
Rollins Road South of Bloomfield - zoned R-3
East side of Carolan next to North Park Apartments - 5.38 acres
zonedC-2
Area south of Budingame Avenue zoned C-l
City of Burlingame H-71 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL F: ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING.
H(F-2)Promote development of potential housing
sites
a.
b
Maintain and update the area-by-area land use
surveys, note changes in vacant and
underutilized sites; share information with
potential residential developers.
Promote development of housing units by
offering incentives for guarantees of long-term
affordability (such as reduced parking
requirements/increased heighQ.
Five Year Objective
Provide assistance and incentives to
encourage development of the sites
listed in H(F-1).
a.
b.
c
d.
H(F-3)Identify sites for mixed use and small one-
bedroom or studio apartments.
Encourage development of sites in C-R zone
and where there is commercial zoning with a
residential overlay;
modiff regulations to encourage mixed use and
provide incentives for keeping units affordable;
consider parking reductions for locations
within one- third mile of transit hubs or along
transit corridors;
consider regulations for shared parking for
mixed use with different dayinight parking
demands.
Five Year Objective
Encourage development of 141 units in
the C-R zone and selected sites
identified in H(F-l)
Provide incentives for development of
units in C-R zone and on sites identiJied
in H(F-I) above.
Encourage mixed use and livdwork
units in the area south of Burlingame
Avenue.
Amend the zoning code to provide
opportunities for live/work and mixed
use proiects
H(F-4) Second-unit Amnesty
Continue the second unit amnesty program beyond its
initial two-year time frame (2001 - 2003), extend to
2006; provide second unit applicants with information
on participation in the San Mateo County Rental
Rehabilitation program which provides rehabilitation
Ioans for units which are available to tenants with low
or very low incomes; consider expansion of the
program by changing the eligibility date to qualify
for second-unit amnesty
Five Year Objective:
Process I 25 applications for second
unit amnesty;
Provide opportunities for rehabilitation
of these units
City of Burlingame H-72 General Plan
r.T HOIISING EI,EMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
GOAL F: ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF.HOUSING.
H(F-5)To expand the stock of affordable housing
Staff contact known non-profit housing corporations
and religious institutions to make them aware of City
interest, familiarize them with the opportunities
available in Burlingame, and assist in processing
where applications are required; encourage use of
private foundation grants tofund affordablg unqf.
Five Year Objective:
Encourage development of affordable
units on sttes identified in H(F-L) above.
H(F-6)Section I Program
Work with San Mateo County Community Services
and Housing Authority to provide Burlingame a
proportionate share of Section 8 funds; distribute
information about program to potential property owner
and renter participants.
Five Year Objective:
Current number of Section I units is 55.
Attempt to increase by an additional 25
units (total of 80 units).
H(F-7) First-time Homebuyer Program
Continue to participate in cooperative CDBG
agreement with San Mateo County to provide
Burlingame residents with the opportunity to
participate in the first-time homebuyer program
(Mortgage Credit Certificate) funded by CDBG.
Five Year Objective:
Obtain assistance for I 5 Burlingame
residents.
Table }J-12 -of 2001 - 2006 Element Work
TotalRehabilitationConservationABAG Fair
Share
New
Construction
Income Category
2052272110lltVery low
ll5 r99562856Low
1680l1157159Moderate
0 698448250242Above Moderate
127030019856s774Total
City of Burlingame H-73 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
Table H-13 -
Note: Numbers in parentheses ( ) are included in the total for H(F-l) for new construction and H(A-7) for
rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation ConservationProgramNew
Construction
20H(A-2) Housing Rehabilitation
H(A-5) Acquisition 20
H(A-7) Design Review 2so
(75\H(C-2) Density Bonus
H(D-l) Elderlv (30)8 (Section 8)
l0H(D-2) Disabled
H0-3) Sinsle Parent 5 (Section 8)
H(D4) EffrciencyUnits (14r)
H(E-l) Enersy Conservation (2s0)
H(F-1) New Development on Selected sites 772
H(F-3) Mixed Use (50)
H(F4) Second Unit Amnesty 125
H(F-6) Section 8 25 (Section 8)
H(F-7) First time homebuyer l5
300TOTAL772 198
City of Burlingame H-74 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
TABLE H.14 - SUMMARY OF HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM QUANTIFIED
OBJECTIVE
ACTION Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time-
Frame
H(A-l)
Maintenance
of Public
Improvements
Continue
maintenance
program for
public facilities
Maintain and enhance streets,
water and sewer facilities
General
Fund, Gas
Tax Fund
Planning,
Public
Works, City
Manager
2001-
2006
Rehabilitate 20
housing units
Referral to County assistance
through Code Enforcement
Program
General
Fund,
CDBG
funds
Code
Enforcement,
Planning and
Buildine
2001-
2006
H(A-3)
Discourage
condominium
conversion
No conversion
of existing
rental stock to
condominiums
Continue to prevent condominium
conversion through
implementation of existing zoning
controls
N/A Planning 2001-
2006
H(A4)
Prevent
conversion of
residential
units to non-
residential use
Retain existing
rental housing
Amend code to require conditional
use permit for any project where
residential units are proposed to be
replaced by non residential use
Public Planning 2002
H(A-s) Ensure
affordability of
existing units
Encourage
acquisition and
rehabilitation of
20 apartment
units for long-
term affordable
housing
Participate in County housing
programs, provide refenals to non
profit housing corporations to
acquire, rehabilitate and manage
apartment units
CDBG Planning,
City
Manager,
City Council
2001-
2006
H(A-6)
Determine
code
compliance,
structural
deficiencies of
homes upon
sale
Continue to
provide
assistance to
potential home
buyers
City staff to assist with research of
residential records
City Planning and
Building
2001-
2006
H(A-7)
Residential
Design
Review
Process 250
applications for
residential
design review
Continue implementation of single
family design review and zoning
ordinance regulations controlling
mass and bulk
Applicatio
n Fees
Planning
Department
and Planning
Commission
2001-
2006
H(B-l) Public
awareness of
anti-
discrimination
laws
Continue
referral
activities
through code
enforcement
program
Continue code enforcement
activities and refer complaints to
California Department of Fair
Employment and Housing; refer
complaints about housing
discrimination to La Raza Central
Leeal
City
funds,
literature
from other
agencies
Code
Enforcement,
Planning,
Building
2001-
2006
H(C-l)
Referral to
Housing
Assistance
Programs for
eligible
employees
Continue to
refer eligible
employees to
programs
Train staff about current
opportunities, disseminate
information regarding programs,
refer eligible residents to County
Offrce of Housing and Community
Development
City
funds,
CDBG
funds
Planning 2001 -
2006
City of Burlingame H-75 General Plan
H(A-2)
Housing
Rehabilitation
DR F'T HOIISING EI ',MENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
PROGRAM QUANTIFIED
OBJECTIVE
ACTION Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time-
Frame
H(C-2)
Provide
incentives for
inclusion of
affordable
dwelling units
in residential
development
Provide 75 new
housing units at
transit hubs
a. Amend zoning code to provide
incentives for residential projects
which include affordable units and
are within 1/3 mile of a transit
sktion
b. Establish partnership with local
non-profit agency to insure the
units remain affordable
Private,
City
Planning 2003
H(C-i)
Encourage
public agency
partuerships
to provide
housingfor
groups like
teachers,
public and
hospital
employees.
Provide 50 new
housing anits
in the vicinity
of public
agency
workplaces
Contact public agencies and
encourage lhem to include a
provisionfor employee housing in
anyfacility upansion plans; have
city staff assist interested agencies
by sharing information on
ho using funding available from
CDBG und other sources and with
technical planning asststanca
Public
Agencies
Planning 2001-
2006
H(D-1)
Increase
affordability
for elderly
households
Provide 30
affordable units
for the elderly;
Increase
number of
Section 8 units
for elderly by 5
units.
a. extend the second unit amnesty
program for five years;
b. Continue to allow curbside
disabled parking spaces in
neighborhoods.
c. Coordinate with San Mateo
County Housing Authority to
increase number of Section 8 units
for Burlingame's elderly
population.
d. Continue updating and
distributing Senior Resources
Handbook..
e. Expand incentives for new
senior housing by reducing parking
requirements for assisted living
projects.
f. Continue City financial support
to non-profit agencies which
administer housing programs for
seniors; work with these agencies
to facilitate implementation of their
programs in Burlingame.
g. Encourage non-profit housing
groups to develop housing by
facilitating project processing and
providing incentives in the zoning
regulations.
h. Refer seniors who are
homeowners to the Human
Investment Project for Housing
Home Sharing Program, to find
eligible tenants to share their
City
funds,
private
funds,
volunteers
Planning,
City
Manager,
City Council,
Parks and
Recreation
Department
2003 for
code
changes;
2001 -
2006 for
ongoing
City of Burlingame H-76 General Plan
DR AT'T HOTISINC RI,T',MENT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
PROGRAM QUANTIFIED
OBJECTIVE
ACTION Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time-
Frame
H(D-2)
Improve
livability of
housing units
for disabled
population
Modiff l0
existing
housing units to
accommodate
disabled
Formulate and consider code
changes that would allow
exceptions to modiff housing for
elderly and disabled
City funds
for code
changes,
private
funds for
alterations
Planning,
City Council
2003
H(D-3) Add
affordable
housing units
for single
parent
households
Increase by 5
the number of
Section 8 units
for single parent
households
Refer single
parent
households to
shared housing
Drogram
Work with County Housing
Authority to increase the number
of Section 8 certificates for single-
parent households;
Refer eligible residents to HIP
Housing for shared housing
HUD
fi,mds,
City tunds
Planning,
City Council
2001-
2006
H(D4)
Provide
affordable
studio or one-
bedroom units
for single
persons
Provide l4l
affordable
efficiency units
for single
persons
a. Expand the multiple family
overlay zone to include the C-3
zoned areas between Murchison
Avenue and Peninsula Hospital
and between Magnolia Avenue and
Ogden Drive, and the area on the
east site of Marco Polo Way.
b. Develop code revisions to
encourage development of studio
and one-unit apartments by
reducing parking requirements
when located within one-third mile
of a transit hub or major bus route.
City funds
for
rezoning
and code
revisions,
private/H
CD A4TC
funds for
developm
ent
Planning,
City Council,
private
developers
2003
H(D-s)
Provide local
share of
support for
county-wide
homeless
programs
Continue
support of
County-wide
programs
Continue financial contributions to
agencies which provide service to
the homeless population in San
Mateo County; continue to allow
group facilities for the homeless in
conjunction with church facilities
as a conditional use; continue to
support financially and work with
local and non-profit providers in
San Mateo County to provide
homeless shelters county-wide.
General
Fund
Ciry Council,
Planning
2001-
2006
H(E-l) Energy
Conservation
for Residential
construction
Add energy
conservation
features to 250
remodeled and
new residences
Apply Title 24 energy conservation
requirements to all new residential
construction and major additions;
require structural and landscaping
design to make use of natural
heating and cooling
City
funds,
developm
ent fees
Planning,
Building
2001-
2006
H(E-2)
Community
awareness of
conservation
benefits
Provide energy
conservation
information to
public
Distribute brochure on available
energy conservation programs and
measures to all residents planning
to expand or build new residences.
PG&E,
State and
Federal
grants
Planning,
Building
2001-
2006
City of Burlingame H-77 General Plan
NPAE'T ITNITSIN(: E'I ,E'Mtr'NT
HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
PROGRAM QUANTIFIED
OBJECTIVE
ACTION Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time-
Frame
H(F-1)
Encourage
development
ofhousing on
selected sites
to serve all
income levels
Promote
development of
atleastTT2
units (448
market rate
units and 324
affordable
units)
Encourage housing development
by making sure zoning is in place,
amending zoning code
requirements to provide incentives
for affordable/transit oriented
housing, fast track processing of
housing applications on selected
sites.
City
funds,
applicatio
n fees
Planning,
City Council
2003 for
code
changes
2003-
2006 for
develop
ment
H(F-2)
Promote
development
ofpotential
housing sites
Provide
encouragement
and incentives
to encourage
development of
selected sites.
Maintain land use surveys, contact
owners of selected sites, promote
development by offering incentives
for guarantees of long-term
affordability
City funds Planning 2001-
2006
H(F-3)
Identifr sites
for mixed use
and small one-
bedroom or
studio
apartrnents
Encourage
development of
50 units in the
C-R zone;
Provide
incentives for
development of
units in C-R
zone and on
selected sites.
Encourage development on C-R
zoned sites and commercial sites
with a residential overlay; modify
regulations to encourage mixed use
and provide incentives for keeping
units affordable.
Encourage mixed use in the area
south of Burlingame Avenue.
Amend the Toning code to provide
opportunities for live,/work and
mixed use proiects.
City funds Planning,
City Council
2002 for
zoning
changes
2003 for
code
amendm
ents
H(F4) Second
Unit Amnesty
Process 125
units for second
unit amnesty;
provide
opporhrnities
for
rehabilitation of
those units
Extend the second unit amnesty
program to 2006; provide
applicants within information on
the County's rental rehabilitation
program; consider expansion of
the program to include more units
by changing eligibility date.
City
funds;
private
funds;
CDBG
funds
Planning,
Building
2002 for
changes
to second
unit
amnesa
Drogram
H(F-s)
Expand the
stock of
affordable
housing
Encourage
development of
50 affordable
units on
selected sites
Staff contact known non-profit
housing corporations and religious
institutions to make them aware of
City interest, familiarize them with
the opportunities available in
Burlingame, and assist in
processing where applications are
required.
Encourage use of private
foundation grants to fund
affordable units.
Non-profit
and public
sources
Planning,
City
Manager,
City Council
2001-
2006
H(F-6):
Section 8
Program
Current number
of Section 8
units is 55;
attempt to
increase by an
additional 25
units (total of
80 units)
Work with San Mateo County
Community Services and Housing
Authority to provide Burlingame
with a proportional share of
Section 8 funds; distribute
information about program to
potential properly owner and renter
participants
City
funds;
HUD
Section 8
funds
Planning,
City Manager
200t-
2006
City of Burlingame H-78 General Plan
2001-
2006
DR F'T I{r)ITSIN(: EI,T',MENT
PROGRAM QUANTIFIED
OBJECTIVE
ACTION Funding
Source
Responsible
Agency
Time-
Frame
H(F-7) First-
time
homebuyer
progmm
Obtain
assistance for
l5 Burlingame
residents
Continue to participate in
cooperative CDBG agreement with
San Mateo County to provide
Burlingame residents with the
opportunity to participate in the
fi rst-time homebuyer program.
CDBG
funds, tax
credits
Planning,
City
Manager,
City Council
2001-
2006
City of Burlingame H-79 General Plan
HOUSTNG GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
Government Code Section 65400(bxl) requires that each jurisdiction provide an annual report to
the State legislature which provides information on the status of the implementation programs
identified by the Housing Element. This report shall include the status of general plan and
implementation efforts, including progress in meeting the share of the regional housing need, and
efforts to remove government constraints to development.
The following pages include the format which the City of Burlingame will use to document its
progress on implementation of the programs identified in the Housing Element. The Evaluation
Form is broken into three sections:
1. Status of programs which target new construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of
housing units;
2. Status of programs which provide ongoing assistance to residents and developers and
provide improvements to residential areas; and
3. Programs which require zoning code amendments to facilitate the production of new
housing.
The annual report will be submitted to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research and the
Department of Housing and Community Development by July l't of each year.
These reports will be used to document progress in meeting the identified housing goals and
objectives, facilitate housing element revisions and updates and assist in subsequent reviews of
the Housing Element.
City of Burlingame H-80 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
CITY OF BURLINGAME
HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
FY
INTRODUCTION
The Purpose of this report is to summarize Housing Program accomplishments for the fiscal year
and how these accomplishments contribute toward the goals of the 2001 Housing Element. The
report consists of the list of goals taken from the Housing Element followed by a description of
program activities for this fiscal year which have worked toward these goals.
Housing Element Goals
GOAL A:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING
MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF
THE CITYIS NEIGHBORIIOODS AND HOUSING STOCK.
GOAL B:PROVIDE VARIETY AND CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF
AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS.
GOAL C:PROYIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES,
TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORKERS AND OTHERS IN THE
SERVICE INDUSTRY WHO WORK IN BURLINGAME.
GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING.
GOAL E:REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY
AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
GOAL F:ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING.
Targets For New Construction, Rehabilitation And Maintenance Of Units
Following is a list of the programs and targets identified to produce new units, rehabilitate
units and maintain units as affordable in the 2001 Housi Element U
PROGRAM H(A-2)Housing ReElbilitation
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Targel Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation 7 13 20
Maintenance
TOTAL 7 13 20
City of Burlingame H-81 General Plan
[.T HOIISING EI,NMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
PROGRAM H(A-s) Ensure affordability of existing units
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation 15 5 20
Maintenance
TOTAL 15 5 20
PROGRAM H(A-7) Residential Design Review
PROGRAM H(E-l) Energy Conservation for Residential construction
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation 175 175
Maintenance
TOTAL 175 175
PROGRAM H(D-l) Increase affordability for elderly households
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation
Maintenance 3 2 5
TOTAL 3 2 5
PROGRAM H(D-2) Improve livability of housing units fordrsabled population
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation 10 10
Maintenance
TOTAL 10 10
H(D-3) Add affordable housing units for single parent householdsPROGRAM
Very Low Income Low Income Moderste Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation
Maintenance 3 2 5
TOTAL 3 2 5
PROGRAM HG-l) Encourage development of housing on selected sites to serve all income levels
PROGRAM H(D-2) Improve livability of housing units for disabled population (10 new units included below)
PROGRAM H(D-4) Provide affordable studio or one-bedroom units for single persons (l4l efficiency units
included)
PROGRAM H(F-3) Identi& sites for mixed trqe and small one-bedroom or studio apartments
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
111 56 157 448 772
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
TOTAL lll 56 157 448 772
City of Burlingame H-82 General Plan
I)RAFT TINITSINC E',I ,F',MRNT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
Ongoing Programs
The following is a list and description of programs where the City provides ongoing assistance, but that there is no
numerical ofthe service
PROGRAM H(F-4) Second Unit Amnesty
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Targel Aehieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation
Maintenance 85 r65 250
TOTAL 85 165 250
PROGRAM H(T-6): Section 8 Program
Yery Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation
Maintenance t9 5 I 25
TOTAL t9 1 25
PROGRAM HG-A First-time homebuyer program
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total
Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved
New
Construction
Rehabilitation
Maintenance 15 15
TOTAL 15 15
TOTAL ALL PROGRAMS
VeryLow
Income
Low Income Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Total
Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achteved
New
Construction
111 56 157 448 772
Rehabilitation 22 28 0 175 225
Maintenance 110 174 16 0 300
TOTAL 243 258 r73 623 1297
PROGRAM H(A-l) Maintenance of Public Improvements
STATUS:In residential neighborhoods continue the maintenance and
enhancement of public facilities such as streets, water supply
and drainage by allocations from the general fund, gas tax
revenue and, where appropriate, conditionq of development.
PROGRAM H(A-3) Discourage condominium conversion
STATUS:Maintain the existing zoning controls which prohibit
conversion of residential rental projects with fewer than 2l
units to condominiums, and which contain strict regulations
for conversion of more than 2l units to condominiums.
PROGRAM H(A-6) Determine code compliance,structural deficiencies of homes upon sale
STATUS:Continue program that assists in research ofresidential
records upon the request ofrealtors or potential home buyers.
City of Burlingame H-83 General Plan
DR F'T HOTISING Ef ,F',MENT
ANNUAL PROGRES S EVALUATION
PROGRAM Public of anti-discrimination lawsawareness
STATUS:
Planning Department code enforcement activities; provide
informaiion handouts; inform the public and local realtors
about equal housing laws and recourse available in case of
violations; refer complaints to California Department of Fair
Employment and Housing; refer complaints regarding
disirimination to La Raza Central Legal,anonprofit
community law center which works with local tenants to
Continue Code Enforcement Officer and coordination with
resolve landlord/tenant issues.
PROGRAM Referral to forAssistance
STATUS:Train staff about current opportunities;
brochures and contact information to eligible residents who
inquire about availability of programs. Refer eligible
reiidents to CDBG programs administered by the County
make available
andOffice
PROGRAM Provide local share of for homeless
STATUS:Continue financial contributions to
service to the homeless population in San Mateo County;
continue to allow group facilities for the homeless in
conjunction with church facilities as a conditional use;
.oniinue to support financially and work with local and non-
profit providers in San Mateo County to provide homeless
shelters
which provideagencies
PROGRAM awareness of conservation benefits
STATUS:Distribute brochure on available energy
and measures at the Planning counter to all
conservation
programs
residents to or build new residences.
the stock of affordablePROGRAM
STATUS:
religious institutions to make them aware of City interest,
famitiarize them with the opportunities available in
Burlingame, and assist in processing where applications are
corporations andStaff contact known non-Profi t housing
Programs Requiring Code Amendments
The-following progrims require implementation of zoning code amendments to facilitate the
ofnew
PROGRAM conversion ofresidential non-residential useunitstoPrevent
Status:Target
Date:2002Amend zoning code to require
project where residential units
a conditional
are proposed
use permit for any
to be replaced bY
non-residential use.
units in residentialPROGRAMinclusionaffordableofforincentivesProvide
Status:Target
Date:2003
station. Forge a partnership with a local non-profit agency to
for densitytocodetheAmendopportunitiesprovidezonrng
and./orlnbonusesrequirementsparkingchanges(through
includewhichresidentialforrestrictionsprojects)height/bulk
ofmile transitwithint3areandlocatedunitsaffordable
insure the units remain affordable
City of Burlingame H-84 General Plan
required.
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION
PROGRAM H(F-2) Promote development of potential housing sites
a. Maintain and update the area-by-area land use surveys, note
changes in vacant and underutilized sites; periodically contact
owners of these parcels to determine intentions for the
properties in these zoning districts.
b. Promote development of housing units by offering incentives
for guarantees of long-term affordability (such as reduced
parking requirements/increased heieht).
Target
Date:2003
Status:
City of Burlingame H-85 General Plan
DRAF'T HOIISING E,I,EMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
DATA SOURCES
DATA SOURCES
United States Census 2000
Historical United States Census Data
Employment Development Deparfrnent
Sustainable San Mateo County Report Card, May 2001
Association of Bay Area Governments, Projections 2000
Environmental Impact Report, 301 Airport Boulevard, Draft EIR Project Description,
Table II.2
BT Commercial
Metroscan San Mateo County
City of Burlingame Building Department, Monthly Permit Activity Report
City of Burlingame Code Enforcement, City Attorney's Office
San Mateo County, Human Services Agency, Housing Division
National Interfaith Hospitality Network Quarterly Statistics, January 2001 to June
200t
City of Burlingame Finance Deparlment
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance, Transportation Action Program, Burlingame,
California, December 2000
National Coalition for the Homeless, June 1999
Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing Policy
Development, 2000 Income Limits, March 2000
7
8
9
10
l1
t2
13
t4
15
16
City of Burlingame H-86 General Plan
DR AF'T HOTISING EI,F"MENT
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - COMMUNITY PROFILE AND PROJECTIONS
Growth Proiections
Over the years, Burlingame's population has remained fairly stable. There are currently 28,158
persons in the City of Burlingame. Historically, the total population decreased 4o/obetween1970
and 1980 and population has increased steadily since then. The highest rate of population
increase since 1970 was 5.1% between 1990 and 2000. However, the net increase in population
for the Burlingame since 1970 is 3o/o.lncomparison, San Mateo County's population has
increased bV 27 o/o since 1970, and the county grew by 8.9% between 1990 and 2000. r'2
POPULATION GROWTH: 1970 -2000
Burlingame, San Mateo County, SF Bay Region
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and Historical U.S. Census Data
The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) prepares population projections for all the
cities in the nine Bay Area counties. They project that the population of Burlingame will reach
3 1 ,500 people by 20 I 0. ' This is an I | .9o/o increase for 2000-201 0.
PERCENT CHANGE IN POPULATION
11.9%
12.0o/o
10.0o/o
8.0o/o
6.0%
4.0%
2.0o/o
0.0%
-2.00h
4.00/o
-6.0%
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and AGAG Projections 2000
ElPercent Population
lncrease Burlingame
I Percent Population
lncrease San Mateo
Gounty
Oa,-r EoglN6o.gfoo
RE
oooNo
Ot
Olti
o
Ol
Ot
F{o
@
O)r{
o
00
Olr-loN
O)
F{
Place Historical Percentage Change
1970 1980 1990 2000 20r0
projected
70 -80 80-90 90-00 70-00 00-10
projected
Burlingame 27,320 26,r',ll 26,80r 28, I 58 3 1,500 4.2o/o +2.4%o +5.lYo +3.lyo ll.9o/o
County 557,361 587,329 649,623 707,t6l 779,700 +5.4yo +l0.6yo +8.9o/o +27%10.3o/o
Region 4,558,200 5,179,793 6,023,577 6,783,760 7,631,400 +13.60/o +13.6%+12.6%+48.\yo 12.5o/o
10.6%8.90h
5.1Yo
City of Burlingame H-87 General Plan
5.4o/o
I
I
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
Ponulation bv Race
-
Although Burlingame is not the most diverse city in the Bay Area (it is 81" out of 183
communities in the nine county Bay Area Region), ethnic diversity in the City has been steadily
increasing since 1970. In 1980, 93.3% of the city's residents were white, in 1990 87.8% were
white, and today 76.9% are white. Today the largest ethnic group in the City by proportion of the
population is Asian (14.3%). By comparison, in 2000 the population of San Mateo County is
59.5%White and 21.4% Asian.''' The trend towards increased ethnic diversity may impact
future housing needs based on cultural differences in household composition. For instance, many
cultures have households charucteized by the presence of extended family. This may affect the
preference for housing type and size, or the number of households classified as overcrowded.
popuLATIoN oF RACE IN BURLINGAME - 1980, 1990 AND 2000
Race/
Ethnicity
Total Population
Burlingame
Total
Population
San Mateo
County
Percentage of Population
Burllngame
Percentage of
Population -
San Mateo
County
1980 1990 2000 2000 1980 1990 2000 2000
White *
24,426 23,529 21,648 420,683 93.3%87.8%76.9%
Black 109 179 296 24,840 0.42%0.7%1.2%3.s%
American
Indian 53 103 65 3,140 0.20%0.4%0.23%0.4%
Asian 913 2,371 4,016 151,087 35%8.8%t4.3%21.4%
Other **
672 619 2,133 l07,4ll 2.6%23%7.6%t5.2%
TOTAL
26,173 26,801 28,158 707,161 99.99Yo 1000h 100.2v,100%
* The White race category may include the ethnic category of Hispanic or Latino.
** The Other race category includes two or more races.
Source: U.S. Census 2000
Pooulation bv Ase
School-age Children: Burlingame is experiencing an increase in the number of school age
children. Of the current 28,158 persons, 19.2% (5402) are children under 18 years old. This
compares to l6.4Yo of the population in 1990 and 16.3%o of the population in 1980. The 2000
Census indicates that 5.6Yo of the total population is under 5 years of age, 10.6% are elementary
or middle school aged (5-13 years old) and4.4o/o are high school aged (14 to 19 years old). This
data would indicate that there has been an increase in enrollment in elementary and middle
schools in the past ten years; and that high school can expect an increase in enrollment over the
next 10 years.'''
Over 60 years old: Based on Census 2000 data, the number of people 60 years old and older in
the City has been steadily decreasing over the past 20 years. The 2000 Census shows that 19.lyo
of the total population in Burlingame is comprised of people 60 years of age and older. The
City of Burlingame H-88 General Plan
59.s%
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
percent of the city's residents in this age category in 1990 was23.60/o and in 1980 it was26.10/o.
However, in 1970 the City had its largest proportion of children under 18, and also its smallest
proportion of residents over 60. Current data shows us that the trend in the next decade appears
to be in the direction of the 1970 pattem, with the number of residents over 60 continuing to
decrease as the number of school age children increases in the next decade. l'2
Median Age:The median age is the midpoint in the city's population distribution. In 2000, the
median age in Burlingame was 38.4 years. The 2000 census data shows that, as has been true in
the past, Burlingame's population is slightly older than that of San Mateo County (Burlingame's
median age is currently 38.4; San Mateo County's is 36.8). The median age data also shows the
shift in age of the city's population. While in the past decade there has been an almost a 3%
increase in children 18 or less, there has been over an 8.5 0/o increase in the adult population 35
to 59 years of age. This reflects the fact that over the decade there was movement in the resident
population of families with young children replacing the city's over-60 population (which
dropped by almost 7%). This is confirmed by the fact that the total population also grew between
1990 and 2000, to a pattern similar to that of the 1970's."'
POPULATION OF AGE IN BURLINGAME _ 1980, T99O AND 2OOO
Age
Group
Age Breakdown -
Burlingame
Percentage of Population Percent
Change
1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 1990-2000
Under l8 4,265 5,402 16.3%16.4%t9.2%+2.9%
l8-34 7,411 7,480 6,667 28.32%27.9%23.76%-456%
35-59 7,673 8,643 10,695 29.32%32.2s%37.98%+8.66%
60-59 6,824 6,291 5,394 26.1%23.5%19.15%-6.95%
TOTAL 26,173 26,801 28,158 l00Yo l00Yo l00o/o
Source: Historical U.S. Census Data
Emnlovment and Education:
Employment rate: As of Aprilz00l, of the 17,660 members of Burlingame's work force, only
190 (1.1%) were unemployed. Countywide, the unemployment rate was I.7Yo andthe
unemployment rate for the entire state of California was 4.7o/o. The unemployment rate for
Burlingame has been fairly steady, averaging 2.8oh, since 1990. Historically, the last period of
time that the state of California experienced such low unemployment rates was in the 1960's.3
The 1990 Census showed that the 56.9% of Burlingame's employed population are employed in
the retail and services sectors.
Job Growth.' The extremely low unemployment rate in the city and county is due to the
explosive expansion of high technology industries, many of which are based in the Bay Area
Region. Although the Burlingame does not number any high technology companies among their
major employers, the growth of that industry has impacted other industries, namely the
hoteVmotel, retail and restaurant industries, that form the foundation of Burlingame's economy.
City of Burlingame H-89 General Plan
4,397
DR E'T I{rIITSIN(: E',I .RME',NT
APPENDICES
The number ofjobs in San Mateo County has increased by 101,400 since 1995. This represents a
33 Yo increase and the highest recorded 5-year increase in jobs in the history of the county. The
services industry showed the largest and fastest growth.of all industries from 1995-2000 in San
Mateo County, growing by 13% in the last year alone. *
INDUSTRY GROWTH SAN MATEO COUNTY 1995-2OOO
Government
Finance, lnsurance and Real Estate
Services
Trade
Transportation and Public Utilities
Manufacturing
Construction and Mining
$Yo 5% 10% 'liYo 20Yo 25Yo 30o/o 35Yo
Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
Job growth can be translated into housing demand by dividing the anticipated number of new
jobs by the regional average of workers per household. ABAG projects 960 new jobs in
Burlingame by 2005.5 In addition, the Burlingame City Council approved plans on August 7,
2001, for a 488,000 SF office complex on the drive-in theater site. It is reasonable to predict that
if built, two of the four phases of the project (244,000 SF) and the day care center (10,000 SF)
might be completed by 2005. The projected number ofjobs generated by the completion of these
twi phases and the day care centeiwould be 1071jobs.6 Therefore, total number ofjobs will
increase by 2031jobs by 2005. With the 1990 Census data showing there are an average of 1.34
workers per household and that approximately 20% of jobs in Burlingame are held by local
residents, the potential housing demand generated by the new jobs will be 303 residential units
by 2005.
A depression in the technology sector in 2001 has resulted in a downturn in the local economy.
Many technology-based companies have cut back on their work force and the unemployment
rate ior the county has increaied by l.lyo,to 2.7 o/o,the highest rate in 2 years.3 Vacancy rates
for commercial office space have also increased by 18-23o/o in San Mateo County.T These trends
would indicate that the growth rate for new jobs for 2000-2005 will not be nearly as high as what
was experienced in the county in the past 5 years, so the number of new housing units to
accommodate new jobs could be substantially less than 303.
City of Burlingame H-90 General Plan
DRAF'T ISING
APPENDICES
MAJOR FMPLOYERS IN BURLINGAME
Peninsula Hospital
Hyatt RegencY Hotel
San Francisco Airport Maniott Hotel
Guittard Chocolate (Rollins Road)
Sky Chefs, Inc.
Park Plaza Hotel
Sheraton GatewaY Hotel
Doubletree Hotel
Coen CompanY (Rollins Road)
NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES
2555
550
480
230
200
r85
160
150
111
BURLINGAME'S EMPLOYED POPULATION BY INDUSTRY
3.4% govemment
11.9o/o
transportation,etc.
12.6%9.1% manufacturing
22.1%
trade
6.5% mining and
construction
34.8o/o services
tr TransPortationand Public
trservices'34.8%
I Trade (incl. retail)' 22.1%
IGovernment '3.4%
I Manufacturing' 9.1%
trMining and Gostruction' 6.5%
ElFinance, tnsurance and Real Estate'12'60/o
Utilities- 11.9o/o
Source: Historical U.S. Census Data
Educatiow eurringame residents are becoming more educated. In 1990 42.5% of the city's
residents had completed 4 years of college. This represents a 70Yo increase in this number since
19g0. In San Mateo6o"n y, 39.9%of th-e population has completed a 4-year college degree or
hieher. From 1gg0 to 1gg0 the portion of tir..ity'r population with a high school diploma also
ro"seby 4o/o.2
City of Burlingame H-91 General Plan
Burlingame's Maior Employers: The largest single employer in Burlingame is Peninsula
iorpitir, followed uv *unv orthe major hotels located in the city that serve San Francisco
International Airport. Repiesented among the major employers are also several manufacturing
firms in the Rollins Road industrial area'"
DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
APPENDICES
Household characteristics
Household size: Average household size in Burlingame has remained fairly stable since 1970
and has historically been lower than San Mateo County's average household size. Currently, the
average household size in Burlingameis2.2l persons and in San Mateo County itis2.74
persons. The average household size in San Mateo County for owner-occupied units is 2.83
persons and for renter occupied units it is 2.59 persons. Compared to the region, Burlingame's
average household size is small; the average household size in the nine county San Francisco
Bay Region is 2.69 persons. I The lower household size in Burlingame reflects the large
proportion of the city's housing stock (51%) that is apartment units.
Income: The median household income for San Mateo County is $74,900.'6 This is a 6l o/o
increase from the median income of $46,437 in 1990. The median income for Burlingame has
historically been slightly lower than that of the County. In this same 10-year period average
housing costs have increased by an average of 168% for single family homes and 105% for
condominiums, which means that the disparity between housing costs and affordability is
growing.
RISE IN MEDIAN INGOME GOMPARED TO AVERAGE
HOUSING COSTS IN BURLINGAME
E Median lncome
IGost of Single
Family Homes
trCost of
Condominiums
300%
2s0%
200o/o
150o/o
100o/o
50%
0o/o
1990-2000
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and Metroscan San Mateo County
Female Heads of Households: lnthe last 10 years the number of female heads of household has
decreased in Burlingame; moreover the proportion of them with children under 18 has also
declined. The 2000 Census indicates that there are 967 female householders, 7 .7Yo of the total
population, with no husband present. Of these female householders,45o/o (436) have children
under l8 years old in the household. In 1990, there were 923 female householders (13.7o/o of the
total pop;lation), and of thes e,400/o(369) had children under l8 years old in the household.r
Overcrowding.. A common standard for overcrowding is the presence of one or more persons per
room. The 1990 census indicates that4.5o/o of Burlingame households were considered
overcrowded and this was a substantial increase compared to l.4o/o of overcrowded households
in 1980 and to 1.6%o in 1970. One factor in the increase of overcrowding in Burlingame may be
the increase in the cost of housing. Between 1990 and 2000 the average cost of a housing has
more than doubled and it is logical to assume that the percent of overcrowded households will
City of Burlingame H-92 General Plan
1680/"
DRAFAHOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
also have doubled. A lack of affordable housing can force people to buy or rent housing that is
too small or to share housing with others to spread the cost of rent.
Total Number of Housing Units: The total number of housing units in Burlingame as identified
in the 2000 Census is 12,869 units. The 1990 Census identified 12,914 housing units. Based on
the census information the number of housing units has decreased slightly from 1990 to 2000.
However, city records based on building permits issued and finaled indicate that the number of
housing units in Burlingame has actually increased by 158 during this time period, or a 1.2%o
increase in total dwelling units.e
Between 1994 and 1999,152 housing units were added to the housing stock. Of these 152 units,
there were 102 multiple family units added, 2 single-family homes added, and an elderly housing
for 48 residents. The City of Burlingame has added an average number of 53 dwelling units a
year since 1970.
NEW UNITS ADDED PER TEN.YEAR PERIOD IN BURLINGAME
'1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000
Source: City of Burlingame Building Departrnent, Monthly Permit Activity Report
Occupancy; Of the total number of housing units in the city, the 2000 Census identified that
97.2% were occupied, and 2.8o/o were vacant. The vacancy rate in Burlingame for rental units
was2.2o/o while the vacancy rate for owner occupied units was 0.4%. This represents a
significant decrease from the 1990 vacancy rate of 4.5%. A 5% vacancy rate is considered good
to provide flexibility in the housing market so that the worst units become vacant and there is a
choice of units to moderate rents. The current overall vacancy rate for Burlingame of 2.8o/o
indicates that the demand for housing exceeds the available supply. The vacancy rate for San
Mateo County in 2000 was slightly lower than Burlingame, at2.5o/o, and for the Bay Area region
was 3.5%
tr Net number of units added
City of Burlingame H-93 General Plan
255
196-GA''
DRAF'T HOTISING EI,FI,MENT
APPENDICES
ACTUAL AND STABLE VACANGY RATES IN
BURLINGAME
5.0o/o
4.0o/o
3.
2.0Yo
1.0o/o
0.0%1990 2000
Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
Owner/Renter Occupied: Of the occupied units, 47.9% of the units were owner occupied, while
52.1% were renter occupied. This represents an increase of owner occupied units from 1990 and
1980 (455% and 45.7o/o respectively). This increase may be the result of the fact that the
majority of multiple family units constructed in Burlingame in the past decade have been
condominiums, as opposed to apartment units. Burlingame is the only city in San Mateo County
with more than one-half its housing stock in multiple family buildings, totaling 51.6%multiple
family housing. Single family residences account for 48.4%o of the total units.
HOUSING TYPES IN BURLINGAME
51.60/o 48.4o/o
trSingle Familiy
Homes
I Multiple Family
Homes
Source: City of Burlingame Building Department
Condition of Housing Stock: Burlingame's housing stock is well-maintained. The 1994 housing
element estimated that less than SYo of the housing stock was in need of rehabilitation and less
than lo/o were in need of replacement. Building permit activity shows that in the last year alone,
2000, almost 4.8Yo of all residential units applied for a building permit to make maintenance
Elowned units
vacancy rate
Irented units
vacancy rate
City of Burlingame H-94 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
repairs or improvements. From 1994 to 1998 a yearly average of 6.5% of all residential units
applied for these types of building permits.e
The City also added a part-time Code Enforcement Officer in 1998 to monitor and address
community complaints, code violations, and health and safety standards. The Officer estimates
an average number of 2 cases a year related to housing deficiencies. Based on the Officer's
observations, he estimates there are 3 housing units with serious deficiencies.l0
San Mateo County offers the HOME program for housing rehabilitation. The City of Burlingame
advertises HOME through their second unit amnesty program. The program is funded through
the Federal block grant monies and the County decides each year which projects will be funded.
Eligible housing financing activities include:rl
. acquisition. new construction financing
o moderate rehabilitation (< $25,000 per
unit)
o substantial rehabilitation ($25,000 or
greater per unit)
o tenant based rental assistance
o relocation expenseso site improvements
o project soft costs
Cost of Housing: The extremely low vacancy rate in Burlingame indicates that the demand for
housing exceeds the supply. This has resulted in a dramatic increase in the cost of housing in the
past decade. The median cost of a single family dwelling in Burlingame has more than doubled
since 1990, from $302,516 to $811,418.8 The median cost of a condominium in Burlingame has
increased since 1990 from $186,083 to $382,005.8 In Burlingame, where 51.6% of the housing
stock is multiple family units, the average monthly rent is $1,950. In Burlingame, the cost of
housing has more than doubled in the past ten years where the median income has only increased
by 6l%.
The median price for a single-family home for San Mateo County in 2000 is $601,235. The
median home price for California is $248,000 and for the nation is $167,000. The average price
for a condominium in San Mateo County is $360,000. The average monthly rent in San Mateo
County is $1,956.4
City of Burlingame H-95 General Plan
DR r.T Irr)I ISINC T"I,EMF:,NT
AVERAGE APARTMENT RENTS FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY
APPENDICES
<O-1-bedroom
apartment
*2-bedroom
apartment
A 1- bedroom
Burlingame
, 2-bedroom
Burlingame
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
1991 1994 1997 2000
Sourc
e: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
$900,000
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$o
$o
MEDIAN SINGLE FAMILY HOME/ CONDOMINIUM PRICE !N SAN
MATEO COUNTY
1991 1994 1997 2000
Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
I
r-r I
-I-Single-Family
House
*Condominium
o Single-Family
House Burlingame
o Condominium
Burlingame
H-96 General Plan
r- =l
City of Burlingame
DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
APPENDICES
HOUSING NEEDS
Affordabilitv
Burlingame was listed by the California Association of Realtors in 2001 as one of the top ten
most expensive cities to live in the United States. The past decade, and in particular the six year
period since the City's last housing element update, has been characterized by an economic boom
in the Bay region. The increase in the number ofjobs resulting from the explosive growth in
technology-based industries in the region can be translated to a dramatic increase in demand for
housing.
The 1994 Housing Element shows that based on the Census data available in 1990, 86% of
Burlingame's existing rental units were affordable to very low, lower, and moderate-income
families. The 2000 Census is not yet available; however based on the fact that the rent for a one
bedroom apartment has increased by ll9% in the last decade while the median income has only
increased by 6lo/o,it is likely that the percent of affordable units in Burlingame has decreased.*
COST OF A SINGLE.FAMILY HOME
$1,200,000
$800,000
$400,000
$811,418
$601,000
,000 ,
$o
2000
Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
MetroScan for San Mateo County
The dramatic increase in the cost of a median-priced house shows that median-income families
can no longer afford to be homeowners. A lack of affordable housing has many implications for
the future housing needs of Burlingame and San Mateo County: it limits the ability of first time
home buyers to purchase in the area; it causes fixed-income renters to slip below the poverty
level; it can cause overcrowding and homelessness; and it forces people employed in the area,
particularly service workers, to live in more affordable neighboring counties, increasing
commute times and distances; and resulting in traffic congestion and air pollution.
City of Burlingame H-97 General Plan
$167,000
trNation ECalifornia trSan Mateo County trBurlingame
DRAF'T HOTISING EI,F"MENT
APPENDICES
Snecial Needs Housins
This section of the housing element will address the housing needs of special groups which are
di{ferent than the general population in terms of the special assistance they require to find
appropriate and affordable housing. This group is broken down into the elderly, disabled, female-
head of households, family housing, farmworkers, the homeless, students, service workers and
first time homebuyers.
Senior Housing: The population of Burlingame's senior residents has been steadily declining as
a proportion over the past 20 years. This is in contrast with the trends in San Mateo County and
the Bay Area, which shows an increase in the proportion of the population over 60 years old. The
Census 2000 shows that 1,9.1% (5,394) of Burlingame's population is over 60, while in 1990,
23.6% (6,291) of the population was over 60.
Based on data from Census 2000 of the l2,5ll households in the City,33.2o (4,154) of all
households are headed by someone over 65 years old. Of that percentage,l}oh are headed by
individuals over 65 years old living alone.
Currently, there are over 13 facilities in Burlingame that cater to the special living and provide
medical assistance for the needs of older individuals. These facilities have the capacity to care
for and house over 500 persons or 9.27 % of the city's elderly population. The newest facility
was approved in 1994 and completed in 1997. This facility has the capacity for 48-beds to serve
the needs of the elder population, particularly those with Alzheimer's disease.
Even with a decrease in the number of older people in Burlingame, there is still a need and a
desire by the City to ensure that their older residents are afforded the opportunity for safe,
healthy and affordable housing. To help fill this need, the City Council created and appointed
residents to the Burlingame Senior Commission. The mission of the Senior Commission includes
the following:
Be aware of the current needs and projected future requirements of Burlingame's and San
Mateo County's senior citizens as key elements affecting the seniors' quality of life:
- Housing/Security/Transportation
- Medical Benefits
- Recreation/Employment/Education
- Public Benefits (Federal, State, County, City, etc.)
- Health Services
- Aging Research and Development
Advise the Burlingame City Council on policy matters relating to and affecting seniors - take
advocacy positions on legislation and programs.
Assemble information and expertise for the Commission to act as a clearinghouse to support
seniors and their caregivers and improve community understanding of senior-related
activities, issues and programs.
Facilitate access to activities and public and private program support systems that are
available locally and nationally.
Educate the community and decision-makers on senior activities, needs and issues.
a
o
a
a
o
City of Burlingame H-98 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
o Develop programs that involve seniors in the community and recognize them as a resource
and vital part of the community.
The Senior Commission, with the assistance of the Burlingame Recreation Department, also
produces a Handbook for senior residents. This handbook provides information and contacts for
housing assistance programs available in the city. These progmms are offered by private and
nonprofit agencies and provided by San Mateo County through the Federal Community
Development Block Grant funding. With information derived from the Senior Commission, the
City of Burlingame is better suited to address the needs of their elderly population.
Disabled: The 2000 Census identifies the portion of the population which are housed in group
quarters. This population is broken down into institutionalized and noninstitutionalized
populations. The current population of institutionalized individuals is 428 or l.5Yo of the total
population of Burlingame. Noninstitutionalized individuals make-up a very small proportion of
the population with only 58 persons or 0.2o/o of the total.
Based on the breakdown from the 1990 Census,9lYo of the group quarters were nursing homes,
3ohwere other instifutions and 5.9o/owere other noninstitutional quarters. Using the percentages
from the 1990 Census, we can estimate from the 2000 Census that a majority of institutionalized
individuals are those in nursing homes with a small percentage making up other noninstitutional
quarters.l'2
Female-Head of Households.'The number of female heads of household in Burlingame has
decreased over the last ten years, as has the proportion of them with school age children at home.
Census 2000 shows thatT .7o/o (967 households) of the total population are female heads of
household, with 45% (436 households) of these having children under 18 years of age in the
household. In 1990, female heads of household represented 13.7oh (1689 households) of the
population,and40Yo (676) ofthese had children under 18 years ofage.
In even with a reduction in the population of female heads of households in Burlingame, there is
still the need to provide suitable housing. With the high cost of housing, there is a need for
special assistance to female-head of households and especially those with children. Some of
these households are assisted through the Section 8 program and other programs throughout the
county such as Shelter Network and The Samaritan House.
Family Housing: Family housing is made up of a variety of different housing groups. These
groups include female-head of households, single persons, married couples, large families with
five or more persons, families with children and non-family households.
In Burlingame, the average household size is 2.93 persons per household comparedto 3.29
persons per household in San Mateo County. Of the l2,5ll households in Burlingame,55.6oh or
6,954 are family households;24% of those families have children under the age of 18. Non-
family households makeup 44.4% or 5,557 of the total households in Burlingame. Non-family
households include householders living alone and householders over 65 years in age living
alone.l
City of Burlingame H-99 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
Homeless: The annual report by Sustainable San Mateo County estimates that in 1998 there were
4,545 homeless persons in San Mateo County. Of these homeless, 3,694 were adults and 851
were children. The total number of homeless has not increased significantly since the 1994
count, which totaled 4,499 persons. However, this count does not include doubled-up
households: those where potentially homeless persons are living with family or friends. The
number of doubled-up households has increased from 613 persons in 1996 to 18,769 persons in
l99g.4
Although it is difficult to track the number of homeless by city since they are generally a mobile
population, the Call Primrose Center of Burlingame estimates that there are 5 permanent
homeless residents in the Burlingame and the 1990 Census recorded 2 visible homeless persons
in the city. Data from the San Mateo County Interfaith Hospitality Network indicates that the
category with the highest risk of homelessness is female-headed single parent households and
that the main causes for homelessness are the break-up of families and the loss of employment,
respectively.l2
HOMELESS IN SAN MATEO COUNTY
1s000
10000
E Homeless
I Doubled-Up
Households5000
0
1996 2000
Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001
Within Burlingame, the Call Primrose Center provides referrals to homeless persons for
assistance with food and jobs, as well as information and referrals to many other homeless
programs. The Center is privately supported, mainly by the Burlingame United Methodist and
First Presbyterian Churches, but also by the cities of San Mateo and Burlingame. The
Burlingame City Council also approved, in November 2000, a conditional use permit for the
Interfaith Hospitality Network to operate a program for homeless families that includes a day
center at 1720 El Camino Real and overnight shelter on a rotating basis. Three churches in the
city participate along with three churches in other nearby cities. The program assists five
homeless families with children and up to a maximum of 14 persons. There are no permanent
homeless shelters for single individuals in Burlingame. However, there is a new temporary
seasonal shelter that operates from December through March located in South San Francisco,
approximately 2.5 miles to the north of Burlingame, in a building on the grounds of the San
Francisco International Airport. Burlingame contributed $30,000 to the construction of this
facility and contributes annually for its operation.
a
City of Burlingame H-100 General Plan
DRAF'T F',I,EMENT
APPENDICES
Resources for the homeless in San Mateo County include:
The City of Burlingame contributes yearly to community groups. In the 1999-2000 fiscal year,
the city contributed $ 2,000 to the Call Primrose Center, S 2,000 to the Shelter Network of San
Mateo County, $ 3,000 to the Samaritan House, and $ 7,000 to the seasonal shelter.l3
The National Coalition for the Homeless reports that despite a strong overall economy in the
United States, homeless numbers have been increasing since 1979. Studies have shown that two
trends are key factors in this increase: no growth in real wages for minimum wage eamers and a
lack of affordable housing. Despite increases in the minimum wage, the real value of the
minimum wage in 1997 was 18.1% less than in 1979.rs
Housingfor Farmworkers.'Housing elements are required by state law to evaluate the housing
needs of farmworkers. ABAG projects that there will be no additional need for farmworker
housing in San Mateo County. The 1990 census shows that only l% of Burlingame residents
were employed in farming, forestry and fishing occupations, which includes wholesale and
horticulture businesses. This low percentage, combined with the fact that Burlingame has no
agricultural lands within or adjacent to its incorporated limits, indicates that the number of actual
farmworkers in Burlingame is very small and therefore, no there is no need for farmworker
housing.
Service lYorkers and Pubtic Employees: The housing needs for workers in these categories of
employment should be assessed because they represent a significant portion of the jobs offered in
the city and because the average wage for these workers currently places them in the categories
of very low-income to median income in San Mateo County.
In San Mateo County, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartmentis 62Yo more than the
monthly income *ud. by a minimum wage earner.3/ Based on figures from the Employment
Development Department, workers in the employment categories that form the core of
Program Name Location Service Provided Category of Homeless Assisted
CaII Primrose Burlingame Referral center All
Interfaith Hospitality
Network
Burlingame Transitional Housing Families with children
Samaritan House San Mateo Referral center All
Shelter Network
Proqrams
Family
Crossroads
Daly Ciry Transitional Housing Families
Haven Family
House
Menlo Park Transitional Housing Families
Redwood Family
Housing
Redwood City Transitional Housing Families
l"'Step for
Families
San Mateo Emergency and Transitional
Housing
Families
Maple Street Redwood City Emergency and Transitional
Housing
Single Adults
Clara-Mateo Alliance
Shelter
Menlo Park Transitional Housing All
Daybreak Shelter Redwood City Transitional Housing Teens
County Winter Shelter So. San
Francisco
Seasonal Temporary (Dec.-
Mar.)
All- primarily assist Single
Adults
City of Burlingame H-101 Ceneral Plan
RT Hr)I]SIN(I F:,I,EMENT
APPENDICES
Burlingame's economy may be earning an hourly wage that makes them unable to afford
housing. For example, the average annual pay in 1999 for a person employed in the retail trade in
San Mateo County is $26,614. ' An annual income of this amount places a one-person family in
the retail industry in the very low-income category. In the services industry, the average annual
income in 1999 was $57,309. This annual income places a family of four with a single wage
earner in the services industry in the low-income category. Based on housing costs in San Mateo
County, this same family of four could only afford to rent the average priced one-bedroom
apartment.
The City of Burlingame employs 322 persons in either a fulI or part-time capacity. This makes
the City of Burlingame the fourth largest employer in the city. The median city employee income
is $69,564. This is l2l% less than the income needed to afford the median priced house for sale
in 2001 in Burlingame.t3 A survey by the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance Transportation
Action Program done in 2000 found thatTTo/o of employees of the city live outside of
Burlingame. According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission the average number of
vehicle miles traveled to work in the San Francisco Bay region in 2000 is 18.7 miles. A total of
19% of the City of Burlingame's employees commute from a distance of 20 miles or farther.
Currently, the City of Burlingame offers financial assistance for employees using mass transit to
commute, but does not offer any housing assistance for employees.
First Time Home Buyers: First-time homebuyers may be excluded from the housing market in
San Mateo County because of the high down payment required. A median priced home in
Burlingame would require a20o/o down payment of $162,283. San Mateo County offers several
programs for first time home buyers, including a second mortgage loan program (START) and a
mortgage credit certificate progrirm (MCC). However, the START program was initiatedin1994
with first-time funds and is currently inactive until the initial qualifiers repay enough of the loan
money to re-open the program. The MCC program requires that the purchase price of a home
cannot exceed $269,000, where in Burlingame the median price of a condominium in 2000 is
$382,005.
Current Housins Production
The current housing need obligation for the city is 565 dwelling units between 2000 and 2006.
Of these, 166 or 29 percent should be for very low and low income households. Between 1990
and 2000 the city added 158 net new dwelling units.'All of these were market rate.
From January 2000- May 2001 the city had 57 net new dwelling units under construction and a
net of 13 new dwelling units for which building permits had not been issued. Together these
proposed units would reduce the city's housing need number by 70 dwelling units to 495 net new
dwelling units needed. Of the new units added between January 2000 and May 2001, one was
low income affordable and 69 were market rate.
At-Risk Assisted Housing Development
Inventory of At-Risk [Jnits: Section 65583 (a) (8) of the State Government Code requires an
analysis of assisted housing developments that are eligible because of the expiration of Federal
loan limitations to change from low-income to market rate housing during the next ten years. The
City of Burlingame H-102 General Plan
DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
APPENDICES
section further defines assisted housing and describes the analysis to be undertaken. In
Burlingame, there are no locally subsidized units at risk, since no mortgage revenue bonds have
been issued for many years, the city has not approved any density bonuses with financial
assistance, does not have and in-lieu fee program.
ABAG Housins Needs Determination
State law requires that in preparing a Housing Element each community consider the housing
needs of people of all income levels. State law requires that a housing element quantiff existing
and projected housing needs for persons of all income levels within each community, including
the community's share of the regional housing need by income level. The Association of Bay
Area Governments (ABAG) is responsible for preparing estimates of local and regional housing
need based on factors prescribed by State Law (Section 65884 or Article 10.6). The factors
included in the division of the regional housing need into individual community assignment are:
market demand for housing, availability of suitable sites and public-facilities, commuting
pattems, housing type and tenure, and housing needs of farm workers. In addition ABAG looks
at regional and local vacancy rates and at housing values and rents as indicators of market
demand. Household projections are based on employment opportunities, availability of sites and
commuting patterns. Type of housing is based on census data and regional projections.
ABAG has the responsibility of projecting the housing needs for the 2001-2006 period based on
the factors identified in State law. The five-year housing need numbers include market rate
housing as well as units for those with lower incomes. The projected need number is the number
of dwelling units needed to provide for the total expected household growth and Burlingame's
share of ABAG's projected regional housing need. The projected need number for the planning
period (2001 - 2006) for Burlingame is 565 dwelling units.
Following are the projected housing need numbers for 2001 through 2006 for the city of
Burlingame by income category:
Need Income C
Source: Association of Bay Area Govemments, letter ABAG Executive Certification of the Regional Housing Needs
Determination (RHND) Appeal Process and Final RHND Allocation, March 23,2001.
No. of UnitsIncome Category Income for
Family of 4
110
56
157
ru
565
75
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Current need
Average Yearlv Need
$37,450
$58,300
$89,900
Market Rate
City of Burlingame H-103 General Plan
DR AF'T HOIISINC F],I,EMF],NT
APPENDICES
Federal Income Limits
The Federal government provides updated information on income limits for eligibility for
Federally funded housing programs by County. For 2000, the Federal government set the
following income limits for San Mateo County.
Federal Income Limits
*Median Income standard is based on a family of four
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Very Low Income 26,200 29,950 33.700 37,450 40,4s0 43,4s0 46,454 49,450
Lower Income 40,800 46,650 52,500 58,300 63,000 67,650 72,300 77,000
Median Income 52,450 59,900 67,404 74,900r,80.900 86.900 92,900 98,850
Moderate Income 62,950 71.900 80,900 89,900 97,100 104,300 I I1,500 I18,650
City of Burlingame H-104 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
APPENDIX B - GUIDE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION
THE CITY OF BURLINGAME'S
GUIDE TO EI{ERGY CONSERVATION
\/
rF
CITY.
BURLINGAME
C..'LIPORNIlt
q
QpoRereE t
City of Burlingame H-105 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
INTRODUCTION
Since the deregulation of energy companies in 1998, the price of energy in California has
skyrocketed. With such an increase in prices, energy costs are becoming a substantial portion of
housing costs. Effective energy conservation measures built into or added to existing housing can
help residents manage their housing costs over time. This packet provides residents of
Burlingame information that can assist them in lowering the cost of their energy bills and
conserving energy.
WHERE WE USE OUR ENERGY
Electricity use is consumed by five primary sectors. Those sectors include commercial,
industrial, governmental, agricultural and residential with commercial and residential sectors
consuming a majority of the usage. Together commercial and residential sectors comprise
approximately 70oh of statewide electricity load at peak statewide use times.
The following graph represents the amount of summer residential electricity usage by category
or appliance.
Residential Summer Usage
4s%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15o/o
10o/o
5%
0o/o .HE8.HIgEE8H}
EEgSEEEi*E5:Ee' 6.==.EE
tr
=.=q,I E H
=
City of Burlingame H-106 General Plan
DRAFT F',I,EMF:,NT
APPENDICES
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SAVING TIPS
No Cost Tips
l) Eliminate Wasted Energy - Turn off all appliances, lights and equipment when not in
use. You can also save by unplugging electronic devices and chargers and turning off
computers and printers at the power strip.
2) Clothes washer and dryers - Do only fullloads. Wash in cold water and clean dryer
lint trap after each use. To save even more energy, line dry your clothes'
3) Water heater - Lower the temperature to 120 degrees.
4) Dishwasher - Set temperature to 140 degrees. Only wash full loads, use the energy
saver, air dry cycle or open the door and let dishes dry naturally.
5) Air conditioner - Clean filters regularly and provide shading for air conditioner unit.
A poorly maintained air conditioner uses l0% - 30o/o more energy than necessary.
6) In summer - Set your thermostat to 78 degrees.
7) Avoid running large appliances such as washers, dryers and electric ovens during
peak demand hours from 5:00am - 9:00am and 4:00pm - 7:00pm.
8) Close blinds, shades and drapes at night to reduce the amount of heat lost through
windows.
9) Close your fireplace damper when the fireplace is not in use.
10) Clean and check the refrigerator coils at least twice ayear. Dirty coils make it harder
for the refrigerator to work.
Low Cost Tios
1) Use energy efficient lighting - Replace regular incandescent light bulbs with Energy
star compact fluorescent light bulbs. Buy Energy Star certified table lamps, light
fixtures or torchieres. Please be aware that compact fluorescent light bulbs contain
mercury and are hazardous to human health and the environment if damaged.
2) Wrap your water heater - Wrap your water heater with a water heater blanket and
insulate the pipes for additional savings.
3) Plug up your home's leaks - Caulk, seal or weather-strip around windows and doors,
seal ducts, plug gaps around pipes, fans and vents and install foam gaskets behind
outlet covers.
4) Install energy-saver showerheads - You can reduce hot water use and water costs by
10% - l5% without sacrificing comfort.
5) Install an Energy Star thermostat - This can save you up to 3% of your electricity use.
6) Install shade devices - Shade screens and window tints are an effective way of
providing passive cooling for your home.
7) Repair all leaky faucets and toilets.
Investment Tips
1) Use energy efficient windows - Replace old windows with new, high performance
efficient windows. Check the National Fenestration Rating Council's (NFRC)
standards for new windows
2) Install a whole house fan.
City of Burlingame H-107 General Plan
DRAFT EI,RMENT
APPENDICES
3) Install a ceiling fan.
4) Purchase Energy Star appliances.
5) Increase attic insulation - Insulate your attic to R-30 standards.
6) Replace your air conditioning unit, furnace, refrigerator and water heater if more than
10 years old.
7) Install Energy Star hardwired lighting fixtures'
Landscaping Ideas
Residential landscaping is a cost effective and beautiful way to lower your energy bills and to
help conserve energy. A well-designed landscape can cut summer and winter energy costs
dramatically, protect your house from winter wind and summer sun, reduce the consumption of
water, pesticides and fuel used for landscaping and lawn care and help control noise and air
pollution.
Plant shade trees - Plant deciduous trees (trees that lose their leaves in the winter) on the east,
south or west side of a house, the sunniest sides, can reduce your cooling load in hot summer
months by up to 30%o. Also, vines or trellises placed directly on a west wall can lower the wall's
surface temperature by as much as 40 degrees. Ground covers and lawns can also help keep your
home naturally cool. A lawn is 10-15 degrees cooler than bare ground and also assists in the
absorption of rain water. Be sure to select drought-tolerant plants when considering your
landscaping to save money and water.
California Energy Commission
Emerging Renewables Buydown Program
1516 Ninth Street, MS-45
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 1-800-555-7794; e-mail: renewable@energy.state.ca.us: website: wrilw.energ,v.ca.gov
Ciry of Burlingame H-108 General Plan
Alternative Energy Sources
Opporfunities exist for residents of Burlingame to take advantage of state offered rebates for the
installation of renewable energy generating systems. Renewable energy generating systems can
provide residents with an energy source that is less polluting, less susceptible to blackouts and
the fluctuations of the energy market. Currently, the State is offering rebates on the installation
of renewable energy systems at the rate of $4.50 a watt or 50Yo of the cost, whichever is less.
Systems included in this program are:
o Photovoltaics (PVS) - Solar cells that convert sunlight directly to electricity.
. Small Wind Turbines - Wind turbines with an output of l0 kilowatts or less. Wind
turbines are usually not a feasible option in residential areas.
o Fuel Cells - Devices that use a chemical process to convert renewable fuels like
hydrogen into electricity.
. Solar Thermal Electricity Systems - Systems that use solar heat to generate
electricity.
Please contact the California Energy Commission for more details on the California Renewable
Energy Buydown Program at the
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
REBATE PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO RESIDENTS
Local Enersv Sunnlier PG&E)
The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) supplies all of the electric and gas needs to the
residents of Burlingame. PG&E offers an assortment of programs that provide residents with the
opportunity for energy conservation. The following are some programs that are available to
residents of Burlingame, including programs for residents who qualiff as low income.
Programs Available to All Residentso l-2-3 Cashback - A PG&E residential program that offers free suggestions on energy
savings tips, low-cost home improvement projects and investments you can make to save
energy in the future.
o Residential Aonliance Rebate - PG&E offers rebates to homeowners who purchase an
Energy-Star appliance. This program includes the purchase of an Energy-Star refrigerator,
clothes washer/dryer, dishwasher, air conditioner, prograrnmable thermostat and heating and
cooling equipment. The amount of the rebate varies from appliance to appliance.o Residential Contractor Program - PG&E's residential contractor program makes available to
both contractors and homeowners cost-saving vouchers. The vouchers aid in the purchase of
energy efficient home improvements. Rebates range from
$30 - S750 depending on the voucher.
o 20120 Energy Rebate - Residential customers who reduce their Summer 2001 electricity load
by 20% are eligible for a20o/o credit on their bill.o Energy Efficient Mortgage - This program allows residents to make improvements that
increase the energy efficiency of their home and finance these improvements through their
mortgage.
o Miscellaneous Programs - PG&E also offers rebates for the purchase and installation of
compact fluorescent lights, Energy Star floor lamps, hardwired indoor fluorescent fixtures,
hardwired outdoor fluorescent fixfures, motion sensors, gas water heaters, electric water
heaters, prograrnmable thermostats and whole house fans. All of which are available for
purchase through PG&E.
Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes
(Low income residents are individuals and families who earn less than half the current median
income ($74,900) in San Mateo County.)
o Enersv Partners Prosram - PG&E's free weatherization Drosram available to low income
customers. Qualified, pre-screened contractors make weatherization repairs and
improvements for residents who qualiff for the program.
o CARE (California Alternate Rates for Energy) - PG&E's discount program for low income
households and housing facilities. The CARE program provides a20oh discount to low-
income residents meeting certain standards. It also insures that low income residents are not
affected by new surcharges. The CARE program is broken into five categories:
6. CARE Residential Single Family Program
7. CARE Sub-Metered Tenant Program
8. CAREfor Qualified Nonprofit Group Living Facilities
9. CAREfor Qualified Agricultural Employee Housing Facilities
City of Burlingame H-109 General Plan
DRAF'T HOT E',I,F',MNNT
APPENDICES
10. CARE Education and Outreach
o REACH (Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help) - The REACH program is
a one-time energy assistance program sponsored by PG&E and administered by the
Salvation Army to assist low income customers particularly the elderly, disabled, sick,
working poor or unemployed, in paying for their energy needs.
o Strategic Alliance Project - The Strategic Alliance Project examines community, regulatory
and political issues affecting PG&E's low income customers and works with community
organizations to determine how these clients can benefit from their programs.
For additional information on PG&E programs and how to apply, please visit their website at
www.Dse.com
The State of California
Califurnia Energt Commission Rebate Programs - Open to all residents of Califomia,
independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding.
o
a
Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable
energy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell
powered generation systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics
powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50% of the system cost
(whichever is less).
Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for
the installation of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal
combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed
generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system.
Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes
. LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is
funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic
type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to
help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them
more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components.
7. The Weatherization Program
8. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP)
9. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP)
For additional information on these programs and the California Energy Commission, please
visit their website at www.energy.ca.gov
CONTACT INFORMATION AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
California Department of General Services, energy informationl www.flexyourpower.ca.gov
California Energy Commission: I -800-5 5 5 -7 7 9 4; www.energv.ca. gov
City of Burlingame H-ll0 Ceneral Plan
DRAF'T F'I,E',MRNT
APPENDICES
Califomia Independent System Operator: www.caiso.com
Consumer Energy Center, California Energy Commission: www.consumerenergycenter.org
The Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Clearinghouse (EREC): 1-800-363-3732;
www.eren.doe.sov
Energy Star Products: www.energystar.gov
Energy Star Rebates: www.consumerenergycenter.org/rebate/index.php
Energy Quest, California Energy Commission: www.energy.ca. gov/education
Environmental Protection Agency: www.epa.gov
Pacific Gas and Electric: www.pge.com
The following resources provide information on landscaping for energy efficiency.
American Association of Nurserymen (AAN)
1240I Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C.20005
QAD78e-2e00
AAN serves as a network of organizations representing garden centers, landscaping and
horticultural interests.
American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
4401 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20008
(202) 686-27s2
ASLA is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge, education and skill in the art and science
of landscape architecture.
National Arbor Day Foundation (NADF)
100 Arbor Avenue
Nebraska City, NE 68410
NADF is a nonprofit educational organization dedicated to tree planting and conservation.
NADF sponsors National Arbor Day each spring.
City of Burlingame H-l11 General Plan
D E'T HOIISING EI,EMENT
APPENDICES
APPENDIX C - HOUSING FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES IN SAN MATEO COUNTY
There are several grants and low interest loan opportunities that are available for housing
rehabilitation, construction, acquisition, and preservation from the State Deparftnent of Housing
and Community Development (HCD). Some of these are accessed through the County Offrce of
Housing and Community Development. Listed below is a brief summary of some of these
progftrms and the contact information for each.
1. CalHome Program
The intent of this program is to assist low and veryJow income households to become or remain
homeowners. This is done by offering grants to local public agencies and nonprofit developers to
help individual households obtain defened-payment loans; direct, forgivable loans to assist
development projects involving multiple ownership units, including single family dwelling
subdivisions.
Contact: Denise Boswell (916) 327 -3586 or dboswells@hcd.ca.gov
2. Califurnia Indian Assistance Program (CIAP)
This program provides technical assistance to tribal govemments and Native American
communities to obtain funds from other agencies for housing, infrastructure, community and
economic development projects.
Contact: (916) 445-4727
3. Caldornia Self-Help Housing Progran (CSHHP)
CSHHP provides grants to local government agencies and non-profit corporations that provide
technical assistance to low and moderate income families that wish to build and rehabilitate their
homes with their own labor.
Contact: Programadministration(916)445-0877
Management of existing loans (916) 324-8654
Fiscal service on existing loans (916) 327 -3717
4. Downtown Rebound Planning Grunts Program
This program offers funding to cities and counties to assist in the construction of in-fill housing
in downtown areas, and the redevelopment and conversion of commercial and industrial spaces
into residential units.
Contact: Robert Maus (916) 323-3180 or rmaus@hcd.ca.gov
5. Downtown Rebound Program
Similar to the new Downtown Rebound Planning Grants Program, this existing program
provides low interest loans to local public agencies, in addition to for-profit and nonprofit
corporations, limited equity housing cooperatives, Indian reservations and rancherias, and
limited partnerships in which an eligible applicant or an affrliate of the applicant is a general
partner, to revitalize urban downtown areas with the addition of residential units.
Contact: Sharon Sarno (916) 327-8255 or ssamo@hcd.ca.gov
6. Emergency Housing Assistance Program (EHAP)
EHAP offers grants to local government agencies and nonprofit corporations that provide
emergency shelters and supportive services for homeless individuals and families.
Contact: (916) 445-0845
City of Burlingame H-112 General Plan
DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDICES
7. Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program (FESG)
Similar to the EHAP, the purpose of the Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program is to provide
transitional housing for homeless individuals and families in addition to emergency shelter and
supportive services. These funds are targeted for smaller communities that do not receive shelter
funds directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Contact: (916) 445-0845
8. HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)
The Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is one of the most active loan programs
operating in the county. The intent of the program is to assist cities, counties and nonprofit
community housing development organizations (CHDOs) to create and retain affordable
housing. San Mateo County HOME Consortium (comprised of l6 San Mateo County cities,
including Burlingame) receives federal block grants from which they fund housing projects. The
San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development is the lead agency for the
Consortium. The participating cities, along with the unincorporated area of the County compete
for funding from this grant.
contact: (916) 322-0356 or
San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development
Jack Marquis (650) 802-5035
Marina Yu (650) 802-5039
Norman Pascoe (650) 802-5008
9. Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
This program provides defened payment loans to local public entities, for-profit and nonprofit
corporations, limited equity housing cooperatives, individuals, Indian reservations and
rancherias, and limited partnerships in which an eligible applicant or an affiliate of the applicant
is a general partner, to construct new low income housing, or rehabilitate and preserve permanent
and transitional rental housing for lower income households.
Contact: Anne Gilroy (916) 327-2886 or agilroy@hcd.ca.gov
10. State Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
As stated in number 6 above, San Mateo County's CDBG Program (called an Urban County
program) is based on the participation of l6 cities (through cooperation agreements) and the
unincorporated area of the County. The program is a federal block grant with the County's
annual entitlement grant calculated by a formula with the following components: (l) population,
(2) extent of poverty, (3) overcrowded housing units, (4) number of housing units built before
1940. Projects funded with CDBG funds must primarily benefit very low and low- income
persons.
Contact: ProgramAdministration (916) 445-6000
San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development
Jack Marquis (650) 802-5035
Marina Yu (650) 802-5039
Norman Pascoe (650) 802-5008
City of Burlingame H-l 13 General Plan
FT ITrlI ISINC RI,[',MF',NT
APPENDICES
I l. Urban Predevelopment Loan/Preservation Program
This program provides short-term loans to local government agencies, nonprofit corporations,
cooperative housing corporations, and limited partnerships where all general partners are
nonprofit mutual or public benefit corporations, to finance the initial costs of preserving existing
affordable housing developments for their existing tenants.
Contact: New loans (916) 445-0877 or agilroy@hcd.ca.gov
Fiscal service on existing loans (916) 327-3717
12. Urban PredevelopmentLoan/Jobs-Housing Balance Program
This program provides short-term loans to local government agencies and nonprofit corporations,
including cooperative housing corporations, to finance the initial cost of constructing,
converting, preserving or rehabilitating assisted housing developments near transit stations.
Contact: New loans (916)445-0877 or agilro),@hcd.ca.gov
13. Human Investment Projectfor Housing (HIP)
a. Homesharing
Homesharing is when two or more unrelated people share either a house or apartment, each
having his or her own sleeping room while they share the common areas. This program provides
matches for home providers and home seeker who will may rent as well as home seekers who
agree to provide services to the home providers in lieu of paying rent.
b. Property Development
One of HIPs affiliates, HAND is a recognized Community Housing Development Organization
and is therefore eligible to receive federal funding for housing development. With this funding
HIP Housing works with local jurisdictions to identiff, acquire, and rehabilitate existing multi-
family properties in order to expand the availability of affordable housing and upgrade and
maintain existing affordable housing.
c. Home Equitv Conversion
This program provides loans and educational counseling to older homeowners to help them make
use of the equity in their home without requiring them to move. The funds that result from a
home equity conversion can be used for living expenses, home repairs, in-home care and to
improve the quality of life for the elderly homeowners. In order to qualiS for this program an
applicant must be 60 years or older and own their single family home, townhouse or condo free
and clear or have very small mortgage balance.
Contact: (650) 348-6660 or Mailbox@HlPHousing.org
14. MTC's Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC)
Planning grants are available under this program, to provide funding for community planning of
small-scale transportation projects such as streetscapes and pedestrian, transit and bicycle
oriented compact housing developments to help revitalize local communities. MTC offers up to
$75,000 per project, however a local match is required for the planning work.
Contact: Ashley Nguyen (510) 464-7809 or anguyen@mtc.ca.gov
City of Burlingame H-l14 General Plan
NR ART ITrlI JSINC T',I,E,MT',NT
APPENDICES
APPENDIX D - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Note: This appendix will be added when the public review process is complete,
City of Burlingame H-l15 General Plan
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
Bb
1t712002
TO: Honorable and Council S
BY
DATE December 28.2001
: T.arrv E. Anderson. Citv ttornev
CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE RESTRICTING HOURS FOR LOADING
AND UNLOADING THAT CAUSES A NOISE DISTURBANCE IN A RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
BY
FROM
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss and consider introduction of ordinance to restrict hours for loading and unloading as follows:
1. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
2. Waive further reading of the proposed ordinance.
3. Introduce the proposed ordinance and direct the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed
ordinance at least five (5) days before introduction.
DISCUSSION:
At the September 17 meeting, the City Council discussed various aspects of noise issues in the City, including
leafblowers and construction hours. Among those was the issue of deliveries and loading/unloading of
materials during nighttime hours.
Burlingame General Plan Standard
The Noise Element of the City's General Plan provides the following standard
No person shall be allowed to cause any noise to be emitted past his/her property line in any manner so
as to create any noise that would cause the ambient L,o noise level to be increased by more than 5 dBA.
Section 4.2
The Noise Element identifies the hours of 10 p.m. to J a.m. as nighttime hours and weights that noise as being
l0 times as intrusive as daytime noise (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). Section 3.1.
Mayor and Council
Re: Introduction of Ordinance Restricting Hours for Loading and Unloading
December 28,2001
Page2
Truck Deliveries
As described in the Noise Element and consistent with current City Code provisions regarding construction
activity and power equipment, 7 a.m. is considered the beginning of daylight operations.
Where residential neighborhoods meet commercial uses, such as near Peninsula Hospital and along Broadway,
neighborhood disturbance can occur when truck deliveries are made before 7 a.m.
Menlo Park limits deliveries to commercial and industrial businesses to 7 a.m. to 6 p.m on weekdays, and 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on weekends and holidays; Menlo Park exempts food deliveries to restaurants and food retailers from
these limited hours. Los Altos limits deliveries and loading/unloading to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. when a noise
disturbance would occur across a residential property line. Fresno limits such deliveries to 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
unless the delivery area is completely enclosed. The 7 a.m. time start seems fairly well-accepted in other
municipal codes.
Because early moming deliveries may mean significant cost savings from distributors, it is probably useful to
establish a bright line with appropriate exemptions that uses can follow. This may also be timely as the City
begins to see more multiple use districts, where residential and commercial districts overlay.
The proposed ordinance attached to this report is a starting point. It has the following key points
A.Deliveries would only be restricted when they cause a noise disturbance to property in a residential
district (R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4) - but not a residential overlay district such as C-R.
B. The restricted hours would be
1. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.on weekday and Saturday mornings;
2. l0 p.m. to 7 a.m. on Sunday and holiday mornings.
The following deliveries would be excepted from the restrictions so long as no more noise than
necessary was generated:
1. Emergency deliveries for health and safety.
2. Medical equipment and consumables to be used in the following 24 hours.
3. Fresh produce to grocery stores and food establishments for usage in the following 24 hours.
4. Deliveries required during those hours by a condition of a planning approval, so long as the
deliveries conform to the planning approval.
5. Collection of solid waste by a franchised hauler.
D. A variance procedure would be allowed when a property owner can demonstrate that relief from the
restrictions is necessary to conduct a use and there are no alternatives. However, the deliveries must conform to
C.
Mayor and Council
Re: Introduction of Ordinance Restricting Hours for Loading and Unloading
December 28,2001
Page 3
strict conditions imposed in the variance process. The Director of Public Works would oversee this process
with an appeal to the Planning Commission and notice to adjacent property owners.
The Council should determine if this concept is a reasonable approach and make any changes that seem
appropriate. Copies of the proposed ordinance have been provided to a number of residents, Peninsula Hospital,
and the Police Department. At the public hearing on the ordinance in the future, the Council will receive further
discussion on how to craft the ordinance so that it meets the Noise Element's goals while meeting pressing
business needs.
Attachment
Proposed Ordinance
Noise Element Goals
Distribution
The Huebners
The Francos
The McGoughs
Carole Groom, Peninsula Hospital
Chief of Police
Director of Public Works
1
2
)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
t6
17
18
19
20
2l
22
Z)
24
25
26
21
28
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH
RESTRICTED HOURS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING
THAT CAUSES A NOISE DISTURBANCE IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
The CITY COI-INCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows
Section 1. The Noise Element of the City's General Plan provides that the hours of 10 p.m.
to 7 a.m. are nighttime hours and noise during those hours is considered as ten times as disturbing
as during daytime hours. The residential districts of the City have expect a lower level of noise
intrusion during these hours than during dal.time hours. Pursuant to the goals set forth in the Noise
Element, the loading and unloading of vehicles that cause a noise disturbance to a residential
district should be strictly limited during those nighttime hours. In addition, an additional quiet
period free from this type of noise should be expected on Sundays and holidays. The proposed
ordinance provides exceptions for emergency deliveries, medical consumables, fresh produce, or
as required by a condition of a planning approval, and provides a variance process when a business
has no other means of meeting its needs.
Section 2. A new Section 10.40.039 is added as follows:
10.40.039 Loading and unloading limited.
(a) Standard. It is unlawful to unload, load, open, close, or handle boxes, crates, containers,
building materials, or similar objects in such a manner as to cause a noise disturbance across a
property line into property located in a residential district between the following hours:
(1) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a weekday or a Sunday andT a.m. of the following
day; and
(2) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a Saturday and 9 a.m. on the following Sunday; and
(3) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a day before a holiday and 9 a.m. on the holiday.
(b) Exceptions. Subsection (a) does not applyto the following so long as the delivery does
not cause any louder noise disturbance than necessary:
i
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
18
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(1) qn emergency delivery necessary to the health and safety of the occupants of the
property to which the delivery is made; or
(2) Deliveries of medical equipment or consumable medical supplies that are required for
usage during the following twenty-fo,ar (24) hours; or
(3) Deliveries of fresh produce to grocery stores or food establishments that are required
for usage or sale during the following twenty-fow (24) hours; or
(4) Deliveries made at a time required by a permit approved pursuant to title 25 and made
in conformance with that permit approval.
(5) Collection of solid waste by a city franchisee pursuant to chapter 8.16 and in
conformance with the terms fo the franchisee's franchise from the city.
(c) Variance-
(1) Any person may apply for a variance to subsection (a) by applying in writing to the
director of public works. Applications shall be in writing upon such forms, and accompanied by
such data, as may be prescribed by the director, so as to assure the full presentation of the facts
involved. An application fee shall be required as established by resolution. The application shall
contain a description of the property on which the loading or unloading is to occur and the relief
sought. The application shall be signed by the applicant and the property owner.
(2) The director may grant an application for a variance if the director finds all of the
following:
(A) The variance is required because there is no other time of day in which the loading or
unloading can occur due to the nature of the delivery and the nature of the use of the property to
which the delivery is being made; and
(B) The increase in ambient L,o noise level shall not be more than 5 dBA above existing;
and
(C) The proposed loading and unloading will not unreasonably awaken any residents.
(2) If the director determines to grant the variance application, the director shall condition
the approval with those conditions that the director believes are necessary to ensure that the
restrictions of subsection (c)(1) above are met including noise monitoring programs, and in any
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
l3
T4
15
16
I7
18
t9
20
2I
22
/-3
24
25
26
27
28
event, shall specify the exact time periods, location, and mode of loading and unloading during
which the deliveries may occur. Upon approval, the director shall mail notice of approval of the
variance to owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property to which the deliveries are to be made. The property owners shall be informed of their
right ofappeal.
(3) Appeals from the decision of the director may be made to the planning commission
within seven (7) days after the public notice of the action of the director is mailed. Any member
of the planning commission or council may request a review of a variance under this section by
making such request to the director within seven (7) days of the date of mailing of the public
notice. Upon receipt of an appeal, or a request for review by a commissioner or council member,
the director shall forward the records on the matter to the planning commission at the earliest
available date and cause notice of such hearing to be given as set forth in chapter 25.16. The
planning commission shall consider the matter in the same manner as the standards set for the
director. The decision of the director shall be final seven (7) days after the mailing of the public
notice of the director's action, if no appeal is filed by any person or if no council member or
commissioner requests review of the decision within that time. Any decision of the planning
commission under this subsection is subject to appeal under the same process and within the same
time periods as set forth in chapter 25.16.
(d) Definitions.
(l) Holiday. For purposes of this section, "holiday" is defined in section 13.04.100.
(2) Residential district. For purposes of this section, "residential district" means a district
that is zoned R- 1 , R-2, R-3, or R-4 pursuant to title 25 ,but does not include a district that is zoned
C-R.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law
Mavor
i
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l1
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day
of
-
, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _
_ day of _,2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COI.INCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COI-INCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C :\FILES\ORDINANC\deliverynoise.ord.wpd
NOISE ELEMENT
)o IIVIPLEMENTATION
TMPLBMENTATION:
POLICIES, GOALS AND PROGRAMS
The following goals, policies and implementation programs are recornmended for adoption by
the City of Burlingame based upon results of a recent Noise Questionnaire (described in
Appendix C) as well as a knowledge of present and future acoustic conditions throughout the
City, an understanding of present land use, and consideration of the General Plan.
DECLARATION OF POLICY
The City of Burlingame declares a policy of excluding and prohibiting all aruroying, excessive
and unnecessary noises from all sources which are subject to its regulatory, administrative and
police powers. The City takes notice that for certain intensity levels, noise is detrimental to the
health, welfare and enjoyment of the citizenry. as u'ell as detrimental to the quality of the
environment. The City takes special notice that it is the penetration of unwanted sound from
sources not controllable by an individual household that deserve the highest priority in order to
insure each person's right to peaceful surroundings.
POLICY GOALS
The policy goals of city-wide noise control are to:
N(A): Preserve peaceful noise conditions in the city where they do exist.
N(B): Reduce annoying levels of noise for existing situations; aircraft, motor vehicle and
domestic animal noise were identified by a Noise Questionnaire to be the most annoying
at present.
N(C): Achieve a peaceful acoustic environment in portions of the city to be developed.
N(D): Consider use of existing city and inter-governmental processes to accomplish noi5e
control.
N(E): Arrive at resultant implementation programs which are consistent with State and Federal
guidelines and which are (i) legally valid, (ii) not unduly costly, and (iii) do not impose
undue hardship upon residential property owners and community business interests.
N(F): Foster in the citizens of all segments of the City an assurance that their concems with
unwanted sound levels are of importance to the City, and publicize the existence of
avenues by which these problems can be quantified and mitigated.
IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMS
There are many possible implementation programs which the City could employ to improve the
acoustic conditions within its boundaries; a wide range of such programs is iresented in the
o
o City of Burlingame N-44 General Plan
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 1t7 t2002STAFF REPORT
TO Honorable Mavor and cil SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: December 20" 2001
FROM: Lany E. Anderson. City ttornev
(1) ADOPT RESOLUTION OF TNTENTION TO CONSTDER REMOVAL OF THE CITY OF
DALY CITY FROM BOUNDARIES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND
(2) INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING DISTRICT TO REMOVE DALY CITY FROM
BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
BY
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
( 1 ) Adopt resolution of intention to consider removal of the City of Daly City from the boundaries of the San
Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District setting public hearing on January 7,2002; and
(2) Introduce ordinance to remove Daly City from District by:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance;
Waiving further reading of the proposed ordinance;
Introducing the proposed ordinance and directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the
ordinance at least 5 days before February 4,2002.
DISCUSSION:
At the November 19 , 2001, meeting, the City Council adopted assessments for the 2002 Y ear for the San Mateo
County Tourism Business Improvement District (Resolution No. 129-2001). After hearing from concemed
hotel owners in Daly City, the Council exempted hotels in Daly City from the assessments until such time as the
Council has had an opportunity to hold a public hearing on removal of Daly City from the District.
The Daly City hotel owners explained that there is no tourism or conference/convention business in Daly City
and no interest in attracting it. There has been no interest expressed by the City of Daly City in remaining in the
District. [Last year, the City of Daly City paid the assessments on behalf of the hotels.]
The total hotel room count in Daly City is 183, with an additional 86 rooms scheduled to open in2002. The
total assessment for Daly City hotels proposed for 2002 was $5,810, or about $700 per hotel ($58 per month).
The total District assessment is $1.7 million encompassing over 14,000 hotel rooms, so the loss of Daly City
will have no effect on the District's ability to deliver services or advocate tourism for the tourist and conference
8c
Mayor and Council
Re: Consideration of Removal of Daly City from San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement
District
December 20,2001
Page 2
resources in the County. Reference to Daly City would be removed from District and Convention Bureau
materials, but individual hotels and the Cow Palace would be able to join the Convention Bureau as associate
members.
The proposed resolution sets a public hearing on February 4 to consider removal of Daly City from the District.
Notice will be given by publication and mailing to all of the Daly City hotels.
Attachment
Proposed Resolution of Intention
Proposed Ordinance
Distribution
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
RESOLUTION NO.O 472802
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF TIIE CITY OT'BURLINGAME
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER REMOVAL
OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE BOUNDARIES
OF THE SAI\ MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City of Daly City consented in Daly City Resolution No. 01-34 to the
inclusion of the boundaries of the City of Daly City in the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District, which was formed by Burlingame Ordinance No. 1648 on February 20,2001;
and
WIIEREAS, the City of Burlingame was informed onNovember 14, 200l,that the City of
Daly City no longer wishes to participate in the District; and
WHEREAS, the deletion of Daly City will not affect the viability of the District because
Daly City is nor a vital source of revenue to the District; and
WHEREAS, modification of the boundaries of the District should be considered pursuant
to Streets & Highways Code $ 36541,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find as
follows:
1. The Burlingame City Council intends to consider removal of the City of Daly City
from the boundaries of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District by adoption
of an ordinance pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36500 and following by amending
Ordinance No. 1648 (2001). Removal of the City of Daly City will not result in a change in the
assessment basis for any hotels in the District that are not in the City of Daly City nor will it change
the assessments for any of those other hotels for the 2002 year.
2. A public hearing on this proposed modification of the boundaries of the District is
hereby set for February 4,2002, at7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at
the Council's Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia.
3. The Council will receive testimony and evidence at both of the public hearings, and
pursuant to Streets & Highways Code $$ 36523, 36424,36525, and36542, interested persons may
submit written comments before or at either public hearing, or they may be sent by mail or delivered
t2l20t2oot 1
to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010-
4. Oral or written protests may be made at these hearings. To count in a majority protest
against the proposed removal of the City of Daly City from the boundaries of the District, a protest
must be in writing and submitted to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California
94010, at or before the close of the public hearing on February 4,2002. A written protest may be
withdrawn in writing at arry time before the conclusion of that second public hearing. Each written
protest shalt identiff the hotel and its address, include the number of sleeping rooms, level of service
provided, and square footage of meeting space. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the
official records of Daly City as the owner of the hotel, then the protest shall contain or be
accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the hotel. Any written protest as
to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity
or defect to which objection is made.
5. Effect of Protests.
If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the owners
of hotels within the City of Daly City that will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
assessments within the City of Daly City, as to the proposed removal of the City of Daly City, the
removal of the City of Daly City will not occur.
6. Further information regarding the District, the proposed modification, and procedures
for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, Califomia, phone 650 - 558-7203.
7 . The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing this
Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Daly City in accordance with the
requirements ofthe Government Code and Streets & Highways Code and mailing in accordance with
those requirements as applicable.
, MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llhday of
January 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
212120/2001
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: NONE
C :\FILES\[IotelBid\modifi cation.res.wpd
aJ12120/2001
CITY
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TO
REMOVE THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE BOUNDARIES OF
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROYEMENT DISTRICT
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1648
NOTICE IS HEREBY G[VEN that the City Council of the City of Burlingame will
consider adoption of a proposed ordinance on Monday, February 4,2002, at a public meeting at
7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California, that would amend Ordinance No. 1648 to remove the area within the City of Daly
City from the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District as formed by
Ordinance No. 1648. The San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was
formed pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36500 and following and provides an
assessment process to fund tourism promotion activities in the District. The removal of Daly
City hotels from the District will have a minimal impact on the overall assessment basis and will
not affect of the other hotels in the District. The City Council will receive testimony on the
proposed ordinance from all interested persons who appear at the Council meeting. To receive
additional information about the proposed ordinance and a complete copy of the proposed
ordinance, or to provide written comments, interested persons may contact the City Clerk,
located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, phone (650) 696-7203. A complete copy
of the ordinance is available for review at the City Library at 480 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
CA.
C :\FILES\ORDINANC\Summary\dal ycitybi d. fi n.wpd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
t4
15
16
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
z)
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE No.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO
REMOVE THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE DISTRICT
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1.
Ordinance No. 1648 was adopted in February200l to form the San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District pursuant to the provisions of the Parking and Business
Improvement Area Law of 1989, as codified in California Streets and Highways Code sections
36500 and following.
(b) The City of Daly City consented to the formation of the District to include the area
within Daly City's city limits. However, the City of Daly City has now expressed a desire to have
its jurisdiction removed, and the City Council of the City of Burlingame duly adopted a Resolution
of Intention to consider such a removal.
(c) Pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36523, copies of the Resolution of
Intention were duly mailed to all hotels within the City of Daly City, and the Resolution of
Intention was duly published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Daly City.
(d) Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of
Burlingame, the City Council held a public hearing in the Council Chambers at City Hall,
Burlingame, regarding removal of the area within the City of Daly City on February 4, 2002.
Following the hearing, all protests, both written and oral, were considered and were duly ovemrled
and denied, and the City Council determined that there was no majority protest within the meaning
of Streets & Highways Code sections 36523,36524,36525, and36542.
Section 2. Section 4(f of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by deleting "City of Daly City"
Section 3. Section 1a(a)(6) of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by deleting "Daly City"
Section 4. Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by removing the City of Daly City
from the boundaries to read as contained in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Section 5. Hotels located withinthe City of Daly City are exempted from payment of any
portion ofany assessments as mayhave been due and payable under City ofBurlingame Resolution
No. 129-2001.
Section 6. Except as expressly provided in this Ordinance, all other provisions of
Ordinance No. 1648 and implementing resolutions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be published as required by law
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
-
day
of 200_, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held
onthe day of 200_, by the following vote
AYES: COI.INCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COI.INCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
City Clerk
C :\FILES\HotelBid\dalycityremov. ord.wpd
E.XHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES OF
SAN MATEO COT]NTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO.
DISTRICT IN GENERAL
The San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District shall encompass all of the
incorporated and unincorporated areas in the County of San Mateo, but shall specifically exclude
all incorporated areas and any hotels located within the incorporated areas of the city or town
limits of the following cities and towns:
Town of Atherton
City of Brisbane
Town of Colma
City of Daly City
City of East Palo Alto
Town of Hillsborough
City of Menlo Park
City of Pacifica
Town of Portola Valley
Town of Woodside
ZONES WITHIN THE DISTRICT
Zone A
Zone A shall encompass all of the area of the District except that area located within Zone B as
described below.
ZoneB
ZoneB shall encompass
1)All of the area of the District that is located south of the City of Pacifica city limits and
west of State Highway 35; and
All of the area within all unincorporated areas immediately adjacent to, or surrounded by,
the city limits of the City of Daly City.
2)
t2l7l200l
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
December 13, 2001
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
1t7 to2
9a
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
suBJEcr: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BURLINGAME SHO
REHABILITATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(2)
D EASEMENT SEWER
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the
Burlingame Shoreland Easement Sewer Rehabilitation project constructed by Darcy and Harty Construction of
San Francisco in the amount of $323,955.
BACKGROUND: OnMay 7 ,200L, Darcy and Harty Construction, Inc. was awarded the contract for replacing
the sewer main in the rear easement area of the Shoreland Subdivision. This project has been completed
successfully under budget. There were two change orders issued for a total of $43,764. Change Order 1
included additional sewer pipe replacement to take advantage of a low bid price. Change Order 2 included
repairing a residential sewer connection.
Staff is satisfied that this project is complete and recommends approval by Council.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment
BUDGET IMPACT:
Construction including Change Orders
Construction inspection
Engineering Administration
Project Total
$ 323,955
$ 52,000
49.045
$425,000
The remaining funds from the $455,000 budget will be used for the Balboa, Carmelita and Chapin Sewer
Rehabilitation Program, City Project No. 9853(4).
Donald Chang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
dc
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Public Works file
S:\A Public Works Dirodory\Staff Reports\98532accept.stf.wpd
RESOLUTION 03_2002
SEWER REHABILITATION
BY DARCY AND HARTY CONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(2)
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the workdone by DARCY AND
HARTY CONSTRUCTION under the terms of its contract with the City dated MAY 7 ,2N1, has been
completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 9853(2).
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certi$/ that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of
January ,20fl2, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, OIMAIiONY
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
fu^*l,vwt
S:\A Public Vr'orks Directory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESOLLITN.ACC.wpd
- crytt*k
CONTRACTOR: D'ARCY HARTY CONS?.
ADDRESS: 1300 CARROLL AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CA. 9{124
TELEPHONE: l4l5l 822-5200 FAX (415) 822-0747
***+*++11*t*t{+*r+*t+}*+**++*+****{****+**r*}*
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PROGRESS PAYMENT #
-3-
BURLINGAI''E SBONEIA}TD EASEIdEM SEWB, RE}IABILITATTON
CITY PROJECT NO.
-98E3--(EL
DATE:
FOR THE MONTH OF:
PURCHASE ORDER #
D6cdbG!-1J /01
Decenber- 0 L
:g,rxtrry|
: PRIG : AIN'I : 3I'3 :
1 : MoBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION
2 : SMOKE TESTING
3 : CONSTRUCTION SURVEY
4 ; REPIACE EXISTING CONCRETE ct RB/GUTTER
5 ; REPLACE EXISTING CoNCRETE SIDEWALK
6 : REPLACE 5n WITH 8il PEP BY PIPERBURSTING
? : INSTALL NElr 8n PEP BY HORIZONTAL BORING
I I INSTALT NEw 8n PVC BY oPEN TRENCH
9 : INSTALL NE!, 8n vCP BY sPot REPIACEMENT
10 ; {X VCP I,ATERAL ( CLEANOUT RECONSTRUCT]ON
11 : LAMPHOLE RECONSTRUCTION
f2 ; POST CCTV SURVEY
13 : NEll I'{AN}IOLES
1{ r MAIIHOLES REPLACEMENT
15 r l4ANltoLE REHBITITATION
I
CHANGE OROERS:
Co I : REPUCED 6" vcP VIITH 8" PEP BY PIPEBURSTING (MH 83-15 to 83-14 to B3-11
Co 2 : FoRcE ACCoUNT WORK AT 1213-1219 ECR
co3:
co{:
:
;913,000.00
: s3, 000. 00
: 91,000.00
! $20. 00
; 95. 00
; s65. 00
| $73. 00
: 9160. 00
: $100.00
9200.00
91,500.00
91.00
93,000,00
$3,000.00
$1,ooo,oo
913.000,00
s3,000.00
91,000.00
91,200,00
92,000.00
s138,710,00
s1{,?46.00
s48,160.00
96, 000, 00
$14 , 000. 00
91,500.00
92, 63?. 00
s15,000,00
s12. ooo, 0o
$6, 000. 00
s278,953.00
100
100
100
100
88
100
110
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
00t
00t
00t
00s
50t
008
89r
00*
00t
00t
00i
83t
00r
00t
00t
L. S.
t,s.
L,S.
L.F
L. F.
L. F.
L. F.
L. F.
EACH
EACH
L. F.
EACH
EACH
BACH
s0.00
s0.00
s0.00
$0.00
s0.00
s0.00
90.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0,00
$0,00
90, 00
$0.00
90,00
s13,000,00
$3.000.00
91, 000, 00
91,200.00
91,7?0.00
913 8, 710. 0 0
I 1 6, 352. 00
948,160,00
96, 000. 00
914 , 000. 00
91.500. 00
92,659 .00
915.000.00
$12,000,00
s6, 000. 00
s13,000.00
$3,000.00
$1,000,00
91,200.00
sr,770.00
9138,?10.00
916, 352. oo
948.160.00
s6.000.00
s14.000.00
$1.500.00
92,659.00
s15.000.00
s12,000.00
$6, 000. 00
$41,620,00
92, !44 ,24
941,620.00
$2
L
L
1.
0.
0.
100.00t
0. 00t
0. 00t
0. 00t
941,620.00
92, L44 .24
s0.00
s0.00
9{1,620.00
92 t 144 .24
90.00
90.00
s0,00
s0.00
s0.00
s0.00
144.24
$0.00
90. 00
CHANGE ORDERS
DATE
SUBTOTAL
PREPARED BY: Donald Chanq 72-f!-200f LESS EM (5I) PERCENT RETENTION
s324, 115.24
s0. 00
s0.00
s16.205,76
$!6 ,205 ,1 6
s0.00
SUBTOTAL t.IITHOUT DEDUCT]ONS
AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTR-ACTOR
9324,rr5.24
9160. 00
s323, 955 . 24
930?,909.{8
$160.00
s30?,7t 9.48
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY
CITY ENG]NEER:
APPROVED BY TOTAL THIS PERIOD
CONSULTANT:
$160.OO TOR REIMBUPSB{ENT EOR SATURDAY C]TY OE BURLINGAME INSPECTION
Si\A PUBLIC UORKS DIRECTORY1PROJECTS\9937('llPro0r6$ P.ymcnt Proj.ot No. 98$(a No. a (SHEET- PROGRESS PAYMENT.t (FINAL))
1Zlll2@1, 3;57 PM
PAGE,I OF.I
916 ,205, 75
at
1.0 !
1,0:
60.0:
400.0:
2,!34.0.
202.0 |
301.0 r
60.0 :
?0.0 3
1.0 :
2,63',7.0 |
5.0 r
4.0 :
6.0 :
1.0:
60,0 :
354. 0 :
2,!34.0 |
ZZA.V i
301.0 :
60,0 :
?0.0 ;
1.0 ;
2.659.0:
5.0 :
4,0 :
6.0 :
;*.*-.-l-{J,aql..aq*:
1
1
:
932t ,tr5.24 :
(916,205.?6):
t
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE I 7 02
9b
TO:HONORA MAYOR AI\D COUNCIL
BY
DATE:December 12,2001
"y;**w ,/t,"WFRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/
Administrative Services Director
650-558-7222
r
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant - BART Shutge
Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant - CalTrain Shutge
Recommendation: Approve resolutions authorizing agreements with Peninsula Corridor Joint powers Board
(JPB) for administration of Burlingame shuttle buses.
Background: Since September l994,the city has operated a free shuttle bus for commuters between the
Broadway train station and the Rollins-Bayshore-Airport commercial and hotel areas. The shuttle has largely
been funded by grants from both the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (Measure A funds) anaifre
City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG.) The C/CAG funding originated from Clean Air Act
grants. ln some years, the city has fully funded the shuttle with transient occupancy tax (TOT) reserye funds.
This has been the case for 2000-01 and for the first six months of 200r-02.
As a result of discussions between Peninsula Transportation Congestion Relief Alliance (PTCRA) staff and
SamTrans/CalTrain over the past year, the city has secured 75o/o grant funding through the CalTrain JpB for
the commuter shuttle, beginning January I,2002. In addition, our inquiry regardinglhe possibility of a BART
to Burlingame shuttle has borne fruit, and the grant will also include 75o/o fimding of u shuttle running from
BART Colma to Burlingame during commute hours. Upon completion of the Millbrae BART/CalTrain
station, both shuttles will operate from that location to serve Burlingame.
As a service to Burlingame residents using BART Colma, the shuttle route will include atialstop at the
Burlingame Golf Center to pick up park and ride commuters. The parks and recreation directo, arrO I concur
that this will not burden the parking lot, and offers a marketing opportunity to tie in a golf package with the
park and ride activity.
Budset Impact: The budget contains sufficient fund balances and TOT reserve appropriations to fund the
2001-02 program, but the budgets need to be corrected to reflect the grant funding.
-A
iransfer request will be
processed after the final grant figures are sorted out.
C: Michael Stevenson, Shuttle Manager, PTCRA
Richard Cook, CalTrain JPB
,;!
I
RESOLUTION NO. 01-2002
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVTNG AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (SAMTRANS) FOR
PROVISION OF SHUTTLE SERVICE BETWEEN CALTRAIN STATIONS IN THE CITY
AND COMMERCIAL AREAS
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, in 1994, the City of Burlingame began providing shuttle bus service to hotels,
workplaces, transit points, and shopping districts; and
WHEREAS, this service has been exceptionally well-received; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Transit District (SAMTRANS) has agreed to provide
trp to 7 5Yo of the funding necessary to continue this service,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The Agreement between the City and SAMTRANS contained in Exhibit A hereto is
approved, and the City Manager is authorized. arfidirected to execute that Agreement by and on
behalf of the City.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
, MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th 6u, of
-
January . 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, JANNEY, GALLIGAN, oIMAIioNY
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NoNe
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
D
RESOLUTION NO. 02-2002
RESOLUTION OT'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
THE SAN MATEO COT]NTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (SAMTRANS) FOR
PROVISION OF SHUTTLE SERVICE BETWEEN THE COLMA BART STATION
AND THE CITY
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the housing shortages on the Peninsula have forced City employees to seek
affordable housing at distances further and further from the City; and
WHEREAS, one way of assisting current and prospective City employees in making their
lives and commutes more palatable is to provide a shuttle service between the Bay Area Rapid
Transit District station in Colma and the City, and to retain those employees; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County transit District (SAMTRANS) has agreed to provide
uptoT5Yoof the funding necessary to continue this service,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The Agreement between the City and SAMTRANS contained in Exhibit A hereto is
approved, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute that Agreement by and on
behalf of the City.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certif,/ that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of _
January 2002,andwas adopted thereafter by the fqllowing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANN-EY, oIMAH0NY
NOES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ToNT
CITY
J
"lhv,tuto
STAFF REPORT
Burlingame Public Library
AGENDA rrrru +-9"
MEETING 'O"..,1,IO'
December 12, 2001
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED BY:
FROM: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian APPROVED BY:
SUBJECT: Request to Attend Out of State Conference
Recommendation: To approve out of state travel for four library program managers and myself
to attend the Public Library Association Conference in Phoenix, Arizona, March 12'161 2002. The
managers include: Barry Mills, Technology Manager; Susan Reiterman, Branch Librarianl Vera
Warrick, Technical Services Managerl Linda Santo, Librarian in charge of Public Relations.
Background: The biennial conference of the Public Library Association, the largest division of the
American Library Association is being held in Phoenix, Arizona this spring. There are many
programs that are relevant to the development of staff at the Burlingame Public Library.
Two staff would like to attend a pre-conference on collection development and building branch
libraries, two activities we will be very involved in the coming year. There will also be sessions on
development of adult programming and community outreach activities, and technology and
planning which mirror the priorities in our library's Plan of Service.
Budget Impact: I am proposing a partnership to cover the costs of this important staff
development. The registration cost of the conference would be borne by the Library's regular
budget. The travel cost (hotel and airline) has been approved by the Library Board at their
December llr200l meeting, from the Special Fund budget entrepreneurial fund (profits from the
Board owned copy machines) and would not be borne by the City.
Agenda ltem qa
Meeting Date o2
$2,260,887.19
Ck.No. 79600 - 80087
(Excluding Library Cks.79943 - ' 79990)
RECOMMENDED FOR ENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for November 200'l
$1,514,891 .37
CK. No. 143155 - 144010
.EFTS for November 2001
$356,886.92
'ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLAN EOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
Agenda ltem 9d
Meeting Date ttt toz
$2,260,887.19
Ck.No. 79600 - 80087
(Excluding Library Cks.79943 -' 79990)
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVED FOR PAY]VIENT
a
Payroll for November 2001
$1,514,891.37
CK. No. 143155 - 144010
.EFTS for November 2001
$356,886.92
-ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
SlFI N EXCEL\M ISCELLAN EO US\COUNCI LCKS.XLS
12-07-?001
CITY OF BURLINGAI.|EI''ARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01.02
NAME
PAGE 8
At40u TFUND
101
320
326
327
526
527
528
529
618
619
620
621
625
92,310.43
157,360.06
701-16
57 ,741 .08
176,353.95
40,383.05
50.00
31 ,361 .63
't2,558.00
5,403.58
135 ,985 .61
665.80
531,70
$711 ,219.35
(la.>r WtD A-L194-t-3
1tt,Lt|.t+
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUICIL:
THIS IS TO
I IICLUSIVE,
THE At'tour,lT
OFfICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
CERTIFY TIIAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IEERED FROM 1 TIIROT'GH 8
AI,{D/OR CLAI'.IS NUI,4BEREO TROI{ 7999'! THROI.J6H 80087 IIICLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
OF 9711,?49.35, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AI.IO IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
!]ITII THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUIITS AS INDICATED TI1EREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FII'JANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEN]
COUNCI L
DATE
DATE
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IiiPROVEIIIENTS FUND
I.'ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
SEL'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
l.IATER FUND
SE!'ER FUIIO
SOLID WASTE FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUI PMENT SERVI CES FUI'ID
INFORMATION SERVICES FU}IO
F IRE MECHAIIIC SERVICES FU}ID
80078
80079
80080
80081
80082
80083
80084
80085
80086
80087
TOTAL
CI TY OF BURLINGAIIIE
!/ARRANT REGISTER
12/07/01
VENDOR DETAILr*. Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
783.33
1,200.00
228.96
51.31
40,516.89
987.55
51,000.00
76,572.00
8,353.00
'1 ,800.00
$711 ,249.35
OFF I CE DEPOT
OFFICE EXPENSE
JAMES P. }IARTA
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ALLIANCE GAS PRODUCTS
FIRE APPARATUS i.IAI iIT.
POOL PR@UCTS CO.IPANY
CONTRACTUAL SERV!CES
LONE STAR LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
AI4ERICAN CO}.|TRACT SERVICES
CAPITAL EOUI PNENT
SOUTH CITY FORD
CAPITAL EOUIP}lENT
AMERICAN TRUCK ANO TRAILER SODY
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JERlCHO PROJECT
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I zED S
23153
23188
21245
23374
23375
?3176
23377
?3341
23382
23383
ACCOUNT
783.33 101 68010 110 1100
't,200.00 614 61520 210
228,96 101 65200 203
54,34 526 69020 220
40,516.89 320 80110 220
987.55 '101 55200 800
51,000.00 620 66700 800
76,572,00 620 66700 800
8,353.00 320 80470 220
1,800.00 101 61120 210
NUMEER IIAI.IE
NUI4BER NAME
80063
80061
80065
80066
80067
80068
80069
80070
80071
80072
80073
101 68010 220
529 36711
529 68030 213
529 68030 220
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
33,811 - 63
24 ,624.00
1 ,832,66
t+Ot -91
50.00
9?,5AO.97
167.68
313.39
383.17
686.37
12,324 .19
3,121-oo
18,135.58
CITY 0F BURLINGAI,IE
!/ARRANT REGISTER
12/07/01
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritteh Checks
PROVIDENCE PEST TERI'II TE 21917
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
ACCOU T
80,00 619 61460 210 5170
VB GOLF LLC
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
MI SCELLANEOUS
RECREATION PROGRAM EXPENSE
CONTRACTIJAL SERVICES
2
4
5
22
2191a
22157
22251
22270
22324
22660
22661
22679
226A2
22899
480.00
265.50
096. 15
000.00
1584
JCC,INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
I NDUSTRIAL SAFEIY SUPPLY
TRAI N I N6 EXPENSE
ITlUSS0N
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
THERTIO GAS TECH
PROTESSIOTIAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
B , ENTERPRISE CORP.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
FIRE}"IASTER SOJTH SAN FRAIICISCO
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAI NT.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
]ODO VARLAND
}II SCELLANECT..IS
TURF STAR
EOUI PI.4Ei/T MAINT.
?4,624.00 527 66520 ?10
1,a32.66 526 69020 250
101.91 10'l 65200 260
50.00 528 66600 210
92,580.97 320 80270 220
44.50
123.18
PEIIINSULA UN I FORI.i & EAUIPI4ENT
UN I TORMS AND EOUIPI.IENT
80074 LUDLOI,J & ASSOCIATES
CAPI TAL EOUIPME}IT
23022
80075 MERIT RESOURCE GROUP
MI SC. SUPPLIES
23076
80476 D'ARCY & HARTY COIISTRUCTIOII, IIIC 23092
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
313.39 526 22500
383.17 101 68020 200 2200
66.37 101 65200 140
12,324.19 527 66520 800
3,124.00 101 614?0 120
18,135.58 327 78532 220
AOO77 KEY RESOURCES
IEMPORARY EMPLOYI1ENT SVC.
?3139 618.00 101 65300 011
618.00
80.00
101 65200 203
619 61160 220 5150
NUI48ER NAI.IE
80047
80018
80049
80050
80051
80052
80053
80054
80055
80056
80057
80058
80059
80060
80061
CI IY OF BURLINGAIIEI.IARRATIT REGISTER
12/07 /01
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hahd llritten Checkg
PAGE 5
AI,IOUNT
510.00
228.36
583.20
665.80
551.77
500.00
14,590.40
290.82
553.00
1,624.77
600.00
166.59
1,878.50
4,975.87
ALL FENCE COMPAIIY, INC.
BLDG. & GROUNOS I'IAI NT.
CREATIVE INTERCOI,INECT
CO4I.IUN I CAT I ON S
CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP II.IC
EOUI PI.IENT MAINT.
G. N. RENN, I I'IC.
SUPPLI ES
Af FITIITEL COMMUNICAIIONS
COI,4MUI'I I CAT IONS
AT&T I,'IRELESS
cot4tr1uN I cAT I0Ns
PACI FIC GAS & ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
METALFAB INC.
}1I SC. SUPPLIES
MICRO IAREHOUSE
CAPI TAL EOUIPI{ENT
OELL MARKETING L.P.
CAPI TAL EOU I PI4EI'IT
RENEE RAMSEY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
OUICX MIX COIICRETE
SIDEL'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
REDWOOD GENERAL TIRE
SUPPL I ES
ALFAX !'HOLESALE FURNITURE, I NC.
HI SC. SUPPLIES
197',10
19768
19791
20008
20216
20301
20335
20376
20505
?0706
20900
21136
21140
21216
21505
ACCOUNT
510.00 526 69020 190
22A.36 101 65200 160
583,20 101 55300 200
547,26 620 15000
665.80 621 64450 160
551"77 101 65200 160
500.00 320 75110 220
14,590.40 327 79470 210
290.82 527 66520 120
653.00 101 66100 800
1,624.77 101 66100 800
600.00 101 68010 220 1231
166.59 101 662',10 219
1,878.50 620 15000
4,975.87 101 680'10 120 lroo
80062 CoRPoRATE EXPRESS 0F T8E L'ESr, I 21819
OFT ICE EXPENSE 57,90 101 65200 110
57 .90
517 .26
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI,,'ARRANT REGISTER
12/07/01
VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
80032 EIITENTIANN.ROVI N CO.
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENI
80033 DUKE!S SALES & SERVICE, INC
t.,! I SC. SUPPLIES
80035
ACCOUNT
669.60 101 65200 110
25,055.10 327 79460 120
13,000.00 '101 68010 120 1112
3,508.00 101 64420 210
1,48E.38 527 66520 120
4?4.98 619 64160 210 5180
190.51 527 66520 140
246.10 101 61120 210
370.44 101 65200 200
125.93 101 65200 20f,
932.51
555,05
'10'l 68020 130 2300
't01 68020 140 2300
17900
18082
18357
18459
14546
18633
18659
18830
18854
18990
19025
19366
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
669.60
25,055.10
1 ,187 .59
'13,000.00
3,508.00
6,607.00
512.10
25.00
1 ,488.38
424.98
190.51
246,40
370 ,44
125 .93
80036
80037
80038
80039
80010
80041
80042
80043
80044
80045
LABOR READY, INC.
TEMPoRARY EllPLoYI4ENT SVC.
MI SCELLANEOTJS
406.80
'135.60
5?6 69020 011
5?6 690?0 233
CAL I TORN IA SOCIETY OF
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
SAN FRAI'ICISCO GIATITS
MISC. SUPPLIES
I.II LLS-PE}I I NSULA HEALT}I SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S
PENINSULA CONTLICT
COIITRACIUAL SERVICES
NATURCLEAN
I'I I SC. SUPPLIES
BAY ALARI.I
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ACCESS UNI FORMS & E}IBROIDERY
IJNI FOR}IS A}ID EOUIPI'IENT
PREFERREO ALLIANCE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
MINOLTA EUSI NESS SYSTEI.IS
EOUI PI.IENT t,iAI NT.
BURTONIS FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
80016 CAL I FORN IA ELECTRIC CO
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
19562 327.50 101 66210 210
327.50
NUI.,IBER IIATIE
6,607.00 101 64560 220
80031 SIERRA MORENO }'IERCANTILE CO,
sl4ALL T00LS
UNI FOR}IS AND EOUIPMENT
18806
19131
25.00 101 64250 240
80018
80019
80020
80022
80023
80025
80027
80028
80029
80030
ACTIOI'I SPORTS
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
CAPI IAL EOUIPME}IT
80026 DOI'BLETREEHOTEL
TRAVEL & T.IEETINGS
ROCKY POI NT LLC
UNI FORi.IS ANO EOUI PMENT
PARKI N SECURITY CONSULTANIS
MISC. SUPPLIES
PEII INSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
VALLEY OIL CO.
SUPPL IES
I4ETRO MOBILE CO.II.IUN I CA] I ON S
RADIO }IAI NT.
PR IDE PAINT
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
STAIIDARD REGISTER
OFFICE EXPENSE
COLORPRINT DIGITAL
OFF I CE EXPENSE
I'II SC. SUPPLIES
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE
!/ARRANT REGISTER
12/07.t01
VENDOR DETAI L
'*' Denotes Hand lritten checks
PAGE 3
ELECTRO.MOT ION IIICORPORATEO
PUI4P EOUI PI.IEIIT REPAIR
PUI.IP EOUI P},4EIIT REPAIR
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
457.al
601 .80
1 ,880.53
101 66?10 230
527 66520 230
619 61160 210 5160
14007
15109
15595
15711
11761
16085
16167
16247
17402
17411
17495
ACCOUNT
387.72 101 68020 140 2200
93.00 101 64420 120
3,291.60 101 65100 220
671.00 101 58010 220 1587
5,987.85 .620 15000
616.20 527 665?0 230
1 ',18.40
5,100.00
101 68010 120
t01 680'10 800 1581
1,654.17 101 64100 250
162.01 101 65200 205
22.55 tot 68020 190 2200
1,349.57 101 51250 110
101 64420 110
101 66210 120
20
20
AI{OUNT
?,940.14
387 .72
3,291 .60
674.00
5,987.85
616.?0
3,218.10
1 ,654.17
162.01
22.55
1 ,349.67
a2
08
88
16
98
211
6l
701
80031 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
17534
320 71171 I
326 79110 I
766.31
93.00
34?,90
NUI.|8ER IIAME
17497
15250
80021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80024 TELEKEY SCAOA SYSTEII{S INC.
PUMP EOUIPMENT REPAIR
I]UMBER NAME
80005
80006
80007
80008
80009
80010
80011
80012
80015 AUGUSI SUPPLY, INC
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
80014
CIIY OT BURLINGAI4EL/ARRA}IT REGISTER
12/07/01
B. E.I . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
iII SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SAFETY (LEEN CORP.
RENTS & LEASES
ABAG - L IABI LI TY
CLAII.IS PAYI.IENTS
GOV I T. FINANCE OFFICERS ASS}I.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GARY . oLSON, PH.D.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
LEONA MORIARTY
CONIRACTUAL SERVTCES
3 T EOUI PI,IENT CO.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
38.61
231.92
101 66240 120
619 64460 120 5110
VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Dehotes Hand Lrritten Checks
ACCOUNT
203.01 101 68020 180 2200
11,358.00 618 64520 601
09072
09168
09518
09670
09884
09902
09979
10077
10256
11020
11568
65200 120
65200 130
PAGE 2
A}'iOUNT
273.53
203.04
11 ,358.00
120.08
55.00
300.00
I ,680.00
220.11
549.91
19.20
2,1 .62
435.00
ORCIIARD SUPPLY HARDI.JARE
},II SC. SUPPLIES
SI.{ALL T@LS
VEHICLE }IAI NT.
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI}IT,
101
'101
101
101
65200 202
65200 203
80016
DOROTHY OI GRADY
}II SC. SUPPLIES
SIATE BAR OT CALI FORNIA
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
55.00 101 61250 240
300.00 101 64120 210
1,680,00 101 68010 220 1344
220.11 527 665?0 120
519.91 101 65200 111
19.20 101 56210 120
101 65200 1',! 0'l0l 65200 120
101 65200 2tO
101 65200 250
625 65213 203
435.00 101 61310 240
CH IEF 8I LL REILLY
OFFICE EXPENSE
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
OUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAI N I NG EXPENSE
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAINT.
368.87
835.n
235.00
709.76
37 ,20
11637
80017 DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEI.IS
CAPI TAL EOUlPIIE}IT
13890
1,647.51 101 6/.250 800
I ,647.51
-82.31
'101 .07
62.10
39.22
80015
I,IUMBER I.IAME
79999
8000'1
80002
80003
ACTION CLEANI},IG SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
P. G. & E.
GAS & ETECTRIC
SAN fRAIICISCO gATER DEPT.
I,IATER PURCHASES
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
I'I I SCELLANEOUS
STATE CONTRO!LER
I,4I SCETLANEOUS
121.22 101 68010 120 1581
320 79410 220
619 64460 220
253.09
294.50
101 65200 140
625 65213 203
CITY OT BURLINGAI,IE!/ARRANT REGISTER
12/07t01
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
8.62 101 66210 222
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
8.62
16,999.11
517.59
1,662,27
90.36
109.99
401.26
298.96
19,912.81
171 ,683.16
1 ,418. 00
400.00
79991 GRAY I S PAINT, BURL!|GA E 01025
TRAFF I C CONTROL MATERIALS
79992
L. ir. cuRTIs & soNs
UTII FORI.IS AilD EOUIPI.IENT
FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT.
79995 DULIN ADVERTISIIIG IXC.
PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERTISING
79994
79996
79997 L',I./, GRAI NGER, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
K & Li DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
r,r r sc. suPPt-tEs
80000
1,662.?7 101 64420 150
01030
01052
02027
02160
02248
02261
02615
03353
03536
03666
45 .76
17 .56
27 ,04
FEDERAL EXPRESS
OFF I CE EXPEI/SE
PROFESSIOI,JAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
101 64120 110
320 80190 2',t 0
527 66520 120
79998 GRAN I TE ROCK COMPANY
STREET RESURFAC I NG EXPENSE
109.99 619 64460 1?0
401.26 101 66210 2?6
298,96 619 64460 120 5120
19,91?.84 10't 66240 170
171,6a3.16 5?6 690?0 171
1,418.00 526 69020 233
100.00 '101 33900
80001 tIilDSTRO|.,! CO.
14I SC. SUPPLIES
09059
58'1.65 619 64460 120 3160
581.65
421.22
ACCOUNT
15,329.76
1 ,669,37
79993 ALPINE AI,JARDS, I NC.
}II SC. SUPPLIES
02036
03054
'1'l -30-2001
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.iEL'ARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01-02
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
42,765.1O
153,192.11
4,512.50
16,526.
2,ffi,11
761 .13
NAiIE
871.70
614.n
't ,216.27
235.27
265 ,354.78
25.63
6,010.95
rUiID
101
320
326
526
527
529
618
620
621
625
711
746
896
GEI,IERAL TUND
CAPITAL II.IPRoVEiIENTS FUIID
gATER CAPITAL PROJECT IUND
IJATER FU}ID
SETER FUTID
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURA}ICE IUND
EOUI PI{ENT SERVICES FUND
I NFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE I4ECIIAIIIC SERVICES FUI,ID
TRUST ANO AGE}ICY FUND
BURLINGAI.IE TRAIII SHUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL TOR APPROVAL $191,762.70
CERIIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROI 1 TIIROUGII 7
A}.IDIOR CLAIMS NUI4BEREO FRO4 79871 THROUGH 79942 IIICLUSIVE,TOTALING I}I
OF $494,762.70, HAVE BEEII CHECKED IN DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY TIIE PROPER
A}ID I}I I,IY OPINION REPRESE},IT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAIIISI THE CITY II{
!JIIH TfiEIN RESPECTIVE A}1OUilTS AS INDICATED TIIEREO}I.
RESPECTFULLY SUB}IITTEO,
THIS IS IO
I NCLUSIVE,
THE AMOUNT
OFF I CIALS,
ACCOROANCE
FIi/AiICE DIRECTON
APPROVED TOR PAYI.IENT
ccullc I L
DATE
DATE
IIOIIORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEI/ARRANl REGISTER
11/30/01
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Llritten checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 6
AfiqrilT
1 ,882.98
52.32
I ,970.00
276.99
$494 ,762.70
NUI.IBER }IAI.IE
79939
79910
79941
n94?
TOTAL
SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFTICE EXPENSE
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
I,IISCELLANEOJS EXPENSE
r,l r sc. SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPENSE
OFFICE EXPENSE
65300
66't00
64560
69020
66520
66700
21301
23311
23373
101
101
'101
526
527
620
'110
120
290
120
110
110
I ,526.50
93,08
38.02
8.45
25.51
31.42
UNIVERSAL SPECIALT IES, INC.
I{ISCELLAilEqJS
SAN I4ATEO COfiI.IUN ITY COLLEGE DIST 23372
TRAINII,IG EXPENSE
HIPSTIERIS SPORTS
stlALt T00Ls
52.32 101 68020 '192 2200
1,970.00 101 64420 262
276.99 101 65300 130
NUMEER I{AI'IE
79928
79930
79931
79932
79933
79935
79936
ROBERT BELL
t{I SCELLANEOUS
73
00
101 65100 220
621 64450 110
101 65't00 110
101 65100 220
PAGE 5
AI,4OUNT
160.00
2,010.32
300.00
85.00
600.00
47.41
127.00
1,171.46
798.?5
9,283.80
CITY OF BURLIiIGAI{E9ARRA}IT REGTSTER
11/30/01
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hard t.itten Checks
ROBERTA TAVAKE
CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES
N9?9 OES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS
PROFESSIOI{AL & SPEClAL I ZED S
22675
22676
?2751
22924
23045
23065
23139
?3236
ACCOUNI
160.00 t01 68010 220 1451
2,040.32 320 80200 210
300.00 526 69020 210
85.00 101 65200 205
500.00 10't 68,010 220 1347
GHIRAROELLI ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
iII LLS PEIIINSULA IIEALTII SERVICES
VISUAL AIDS
ROBERTA RESTANI
CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES
PI T}IEY BOI'ES
OFT I CE EXPEI.ISE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
79934 MEEHA},I BATTERY
EOUIPI'IE}IT t.IAI NT.47.41 101 68020 200 2200
1?7.00 10't 64420 031
n8.25 'tol 65300 0t1
9,283.80 320 75110 210
?5
320
PI TNEY ECII.IES
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
OFFICE EXPENSE
79937 KEY RESOURCES
TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOYI,IENT SVC.
79938 ovA PARTNERS, t[C.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
22672
571 ,73
22828
623,46
546.00
23128
NUI4BER NAME
79913
79914
79915
79916
79917
79918
79919
799?2
79923
799?5
SPRINT PCS
co4l4uN I cAT I ON S
CO.|I4UI,I I CAT I ON S
UTILITY EXPENSE
101 66210
526 69020
896 202a1
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
3,000.00
2,38/.43
1,200.00
522.00
257 .42
129.04
6,922.04
15.76
720.OO
390.00
761.13
57.00
14,374,00
CIIY OF BURLINGAMELiARRAI,IT REGISTER
11/30t01
VEIIDOR DETATL.ir Denotes Hand llritten Checks
LYNX TECHNOLOGIES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ACCOUNT
3,000.00 320 75170 210
21767
LAI'RENCE S. },IOY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
NANCY LOCKE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COUIIIY OF SAN }IATEO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
UI,I I SOURCE NORTHERN CAL OIVISION
I.IISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
DGBA AND ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PATRI CIA I.ICI.IORROIi
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
150
160
1,200,00 101 68010 220 1462
522.00 101 68010 220 1460
257.82 101 65150 220
129.04 526 69020 290
6,922.04 101 !7010
45,76 101 65200 110
720.00 101 68010 220 1462
8,540.00 320 7A520 210
390.00 10't 64350 240
761,13 529 68030 l20 4200
57.00 '101 68010 220 1344
14,374.00 320 80170 220
20501
20721
20954
21195
?1209
21181
21875
21997
22301
225a4
2259a
174
529
677
7
3
3
SPECIALTY TECHT,IICAL PUBLISHERS I 22153
DUES & SUBSCRIPIIONS
79927 PI TNEY BOIJES RESERVE ACCqJNT
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
22624 5,000.00 101 15500
5,000.00
8,540.00
79920 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE I./EST, I 21819
OTFICE EXPENSE
79921 SA}I I.IATEO ICE CHALET
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
79926 AI4ERICAII ASPHALT
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
79921 SIERRA PACIIIC TURF SUPPLY
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
NU}IBER NAME
79898
79A99
79900
79901
79902
79903
79904
79905
79906
w907
79908
79909
PENTNSULA CORRIDOR
REIITS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
320 78290 220
326 80320 220
101 66210 180
526 69020 180
527 56520 180
PAGE 3
AMOUIIT
70,629,37
197.8A
2,400.00
694.00
40,500.00
202.93
79.92
975.00
3,755.00
1'16 -92
497.57
25.63
500.00
LINHART PETERSEII POI'ERS ASSOC. 16599
Ii{I SCELLAIIEOUS
SIIAI.I PIPELINE INC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEUARRAXT REGISTER
11/30/01
VENDOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes Hard llritten Checks
ACC0UITT
35,941.85 731 22515
&,116,87
4 ,512,50
STEIIART AIID STEVENSO}I
FIRE APPARATUS IiIAI}.IT.
RALF SINGER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
LABOR READY, INC.
TEI.IPORARY EI4PLOYIIENT SVC.
JJR CO}ISTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
BLACK qJ TAIN SPRING !'ATER
IiI I SC. SUPPLIES
BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC
OFFICE EXPEIISE
STEVE SILVER PRODUCTIONS INC
I,{ I SC. SUPPLIES
JOINT
17959
17983
14476
159
18979
19330
19588
19675
20060
20105
20301
20335
197.44 525 65213 203
2,400.00 101 68010 220 1460
694.00 526 69020 011
40,500.00 320 79380 210
202.93 527 66520 120
n,9? 101 65200't10
975.00 101 68010 't20 1321
251 -&
25't .67
251 .67
EL CAIiI I}IO CIIARTER LI ES INC
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
GE CAPITAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
416.92 101 68010 120 1323
101 58020 110 2100
101 68010 220 1100
79910 AT&T 9IRELESS
cofitluN I cAT I O[ S
79911 PACI F IC GAS & ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
25.63 736 61571 160
500.00 520 80510 220
79912 OAPPER TIRE CO., INC.
STJPPLIES
20164 249.Q 620 15000
289.12
35,941.85
99-51
398.06
?0216
VE}IDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
2,117.9
2,224.19
512.10
97,99
648,A2
139,94
167,00
127,00
130.7f
1 ,434.00
425.00
742-49
198.17
606.91
PAGE 2
A}IOUNT
871,70
271 .63
184.80
37.39
9,112.40
664 -27
401.00
2,376.00
12,366.57
533.60
79887 ABAG . LIABILITY
CLAI}.IS PAYMENTS
SEOUOIA U}I IOII HIGII SCHOOL
OFFICE EXPETISE
INTERSTATE TRAFFIC
MISC. SUPPLIES
CIIIET GARY 11. t,IISSEL
OFF I CE EXPE}ISE
I.{ I SC. SUPPLIES
UNI FORI.IS AI,IO EOUIPMENT
cottMuli I cATrolrs
EOUIP}.IENT HAINT.
GAS, OIL & GREASE
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIOIIS
TRAVEL & I'IEETI}IGS
TRAINII.IG EXPENSE
PRISONER EXPEI.ISE
POLICE INVESTIG.ATION EXPENSE
t,I I SC. SUPPL IES
I.I I SCELLANEOIIS
NUI.IBER IIAI.IE
79B88
79889
79a91
79a93
791
79895
79896
09518
09720
09790
11571
13720
13758
13890
14007
11114
15196
101
101
101
t0l
101
t0t
101
101
101
101
101
10'l
320
73!
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
55100
65100
65100
65100
55100nao
22574
110
120
140
160
200
201
210
240
250
260
?91
292
120
ACCOUNT
874.70 518 64520 601
271.53 101 65100 110
184.80 101 66210 t20
37.39 625 65213 203
79892 DANKA OFFICE II'IAGING CO
CITY HALL IIAIN]ENANCE 668.27 621 &450 200
401.00 101 54250 200
DOCUMEIIT PROCESSIIIG SYSTEMS
EAUI PI.iEIIT t.IAINT.
ELECTRO-}IOT I OII INCORPORATEO
PUI{P EAUIPMEIIT REPAI R
PUXP EAUI PIiIE}IT REPAI R
INVENSYS }IETERING SYSTEMS
CAPITAL EOUIPiIENT
EVERGREEN
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
1,18t].00
1, t88.00
526 59020 230
527 65520 230
12t366.57 526 69020 803
533.60 lot 680'10 220 1160
79897 SYDNEY I{ALK@
SI.IALL T@LS
16317
226,53 620 66700 130
226.53
79890 IHE ADAI.I. HI LL COI.IPAIIY
FIRE APPARATUS iIAINT.
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER
11/30/O1
79871 * NATIONAL UNION TIRE INSURANCE CO 23571
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
CITY Of BURLINGAI,4ES'ARRAIIT REGISTER
11/30/01
VENDOR D€TAILr*r Denotes HEnd gritten Checks
NUI.4BER NAi{E
79872 L. ll. cuRTrs & soNs
FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT
79873 GENE EVANS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
79871 EL/I}IG IRRIGATION PROOUCTS
}IISCELLANEOUS
79876 IJ.It'. GRAINGER, INC.
I{ISC. SUPPL!ES
79877
79878
79880
79881
79882
79aa4
79885
ACCOUNT
120,000.00 731 22535
65.35 101 65200 203
560.00 101 6A010 220 1112
846.91 101 6t,020 192 2200
1t333,82 A96 20282
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
120,000.00
65.35
360.00
u6.91
4,333,82
386.08
554,07
217 -OA
5.n
'108,809.99
61.67
342 -50
783 - 00
333.00
217,08 101 66210 200
5.75 620't5000
61.67 620 15000
382.50 101 58010 220 1344
783.00 101 68010 220 1590
333.00 101 68010 220 1347
8.639.25 320 40232 220
GRANITE ROCK COI4PANY
S!DEL/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFAC I NG EXPEIJSE
NATIONI.IIOE }JIRE & BRUSH I4FG.
EOIJTPIIE}IT MA I NT.
SAI,I I.IATEO COUNTY COIIVENTIOII &
I.I T SCE L LAII ECTIS
SERRAMONTE FORD INC.
SUPPLIES
JEA}I BUCKS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
!,ALTER GREIIN
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
TESTING EIIG I NEERS, INC.
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
272,16
zal .91
10'l 66210 219
101 66210 226
02149
02157
021a1
02214
0?261
03002
03205
03431
03523
09019
09125
09147
09270
79886 OCE I.BRUNING, I}IC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
09193
855.37 101 66100 210
855.37
a,$9.25
02027
79875 L/ATER,/F I NANCE PETTY CASII
MI SCELLANEOUS
79879 PUTNAI'I BUICK PONTIAC GI.IC
SUPPLIES
386.08 101 66240 120
108,809,99 731 22587
79883 I'lUFFIE CALBREATH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11-21-2001
CTTY OF EURLINGAME
T'ARRANT REGI STER
tuID RECAP - 0l -02
PAGE 11
AI'IOUNT
110,598.39
971,00
96,560.44
3,200,00
6,174,22
170,277.07
498,91
9,320,39
067.38
249.18
,401 .93
t5r7 ,917 .29 .rqs3I
'119t -
NAI4E
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
FUND
101
130
320
326
526
527
528
529
618
619
620
621
731
736
896
7
2
5
20,910.38
7t,165.57
8,760.00
42,758.39
(-ts.oo) uc
?s.oo> 0!-
551t1u1 .a1
HONORABLE I{AYOR AIID CITY CqJNCIL:
CER]IFY THAT THE CLAIUS LISTED ON PAGES NU}IEERED FROI.I 1 TIIRCI'GH 11
AID/OR CLAII|S ItUitBERED FRor,t ?9736 TIRCUGH 79870 IilCLUSIVE,ToTALI]IG tN
OF S5'7,917.29, HAVE BEE}I CHECXED IN DETATL A}ID APPROVED BY TIIE PROPER
AND tX I{Y OPI}IIOII REPRESENT fAIR AiIO JUST CIIARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
UITH IIIEIR RESPECTTVE ATqJ TS AS INDICATED THEREOII.
vo t9
VOI D
THI S IS TO
tllcLUslvE,
THE A!,IOI,IIT
O'FICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
RESPECTIULLY SUBI.IITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVEO FOR PAYI{ENT
DATE
cou ct L DATE
CEIIERAL FUND
PAYPOLL REVOLVING FUND
CAPITAL I},IPROVEI.iENTS FUND
!/ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
i.JATER FI'ND
SE!'ER TUND
SOLTD IIASTE FU}ID
GOLF CENTER TU}ID
SELT I NSURA}.ICE IUIID
FACI LI TIES SERVICES FUND
EAUTPI.IEIIT SERVICES FU}ID
INFORI.'AT IOII SERVICES FUND
'RUST
ANO AGE}ICY FTJND
BURLINGAXE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
CITY OF BURLIXGAI.IE
TIARRANT REGISTER
11/21t01
PAGE 10
AI.IOIJNT
505.09
625.79
295.92
1,125,00
163 -50
109.00
190 - /,5
s557 ,917 ,29
NUI,IBER NAI4E
79464
79865
79866
797
TOTAL
JOLEEN EUTLER
TRAINING EXPENSE
PARADISO MECHANTCAL
DEPOSTT RETUIIDS
SAN IRANCTSCO IXAI{INER
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
THE PRACTICAL SOLU?IOIIS GRqJP
}II SCELLANEOI,IS
NW ANCHOR DETATLI}IG
vEfltcLE ltAtllT.
NU9 AICO ITTERNATIO}IAL
STREET RESURIACING EXPE}ISE
79870 AI.ISTERDAII PRIIITII,IG AIID LITHO
OFFICE EXPENSE
23364
23365
23366
23367
?3368
23369
23370
ACCOUNT
505.09 101 65500 260
625.79 526 22501
295.92 101 64400 i20
4,125.00 618 64520 038
163,50 101 65200 202
VENDOR DETAIL
'*' oenotes Hand lhitten Checks
109.00 101 66210 226
190.45 101 64200 tt0
CITY OT EURLIIIGAI.IETJARRANT REGISTER
11/21t01
VENDOR DEIAILr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
PAGE 9
AMOUI,IT
20,506.90
10. l8
418,03
735,55
5,482,00
177 -OO
23,550.00
2,592.00
77.25
18. 16
300.00
167.81
75.00
I,IUMBER NAI.IE
79848
79849
79850
79451
79452
753
79454
79855
79456
79858
n859
n861
n862
PATRICIA ERATT
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
lIILLIAI.I HUEI
DEPOSIT RETUIIDS
EANK OF A!1ER I CA
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
ROO GARCIA
t.I I SCELLANEOUS
NOVA PARTNERS, I NC.
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S
DIRECTV
iI I SC. SUPPLIES
K&L AU]CX.IOT I VE SERVICE
EOUIPI.IEIIT I.IAI NT,
RCSt
COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES
VEI,ITEK I}ITERNATIOIIAL
COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES
FRED CROIJE
I,IISCELLANEOUS
N8'7 }IASANAO SHIIIADA
I.IISCELLAIEq,S
BotsE cAscADE offlcE pRoDucTs c0 23306
OFF ICE EXPENSE
ur,r I VERSAL SPECIALTIES, lNC.
I'l I SCEL LAr,rEorrS
ACCOUNT
20,506,90 520 75110 2r0
10.18 526 69020 120
418,03 101 64250 ll0
735,55 101 68020 192 2200
3,482.00 620 66700 200
ln.oo 101 &420 240
23,550.00 101 66210 220
2,592.00 320 AO17O 22O
n.25
'26
22500
18.16 526 22500
300.00 731 22520
300-00 731 22520
1t0.00 731 22520
ft7.U 526 22500
75.00 731 225A1
23338
E!{PLOYER RESCI.,IRCE TNSTITUTE, INC
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
23353
23236
?3253
25511
23354
?3355
23357
23354
23360
23361
23362
79863 }IARIBETH FARCICII
LIERARY EXPEIISES
23363
100.00 731 22531
100.00
300.00
150.00
23359
79860 LARRATT BROS PLUI.IBING
DEPOSIT RETUIIDS
23356
CITY OF BURL I NGA!,iE
L/ARRANT REGISTER
't1t21t01
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hsnd tlritten Checks
PAGE 8
1,260.00
8,760.00
16.28
100.00
520,00
6n .50
75,00
120.00
25,000.00
47.41
506.92
2,737 .OO
158.00
618.00
1,250.00
NUI,IEER NAME
79832
79a33
79431
79834
79839
79810
nu1
79442
79844
79845
79816
22621
79835 COLLEEN JOiIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22673
79836 sAN |{ATEo REGIoNAL }IETIJoRK, tNC, 22759
U'ILITY EXPENSE
79837
TE}IIIANT
SUPPLIES
i{DL PLASTIC BACS COI.IPAIIY
}IISC. SUPPLIES
A}IY GETTLE
LIBRARY EXPENSES
DAiLEIIE ROSE DEI,IARIA
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
I.IARSTEN STREET PARTNERS
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
I.IEEIIAI,I BATTERY
EoulPlrEIT [AtNr.
I.I I CHAEL STERN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
KEY RESOURCES
TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOY}IEXT SVC.
1,260.00 101 68010 220 t585
8,760.00 736 &r70 220
16.28 620 15000
100.00 101 58010 220 1589
520.00 896 20241
5n.50 101 68020 120 2200
75.00 731 22531
25,000,00 320 76010 120
47.41 101 68020 200 2200
506.92 101 &420 250
2,737.00 101 61420 120
164-00 101 68010 220 1584
518,00 101 65300 011
1,250.00 101 64250 z',t0
NORTH A}IERICAN SPORTS I.IANAGEI4ENT 22582
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVTCES
PARKING CO.IPAiIY OF AI,iER I CA
COilTRACTUAL SERVTCES
ROBERT BELL
TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS
NU3 iIERI T RESqJRCE GTOTJP
illsc, suPPLtEs
22500
22814
228r'.0
22495
23045
23065
23076
23097
23139
23178MAZE & ASSOCIATES
PROTESSIOiIAL & SPECIALIZEO S
798/7 I.IANAGEI.IEI{T PARTNERS
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
23r80
300 , 00 101 &150 2'10
300.00
22807
ACCoUIT
120,00 101 68010 220 1461
AMOUI.IT
79419
79420
721
79822
79823
79821
727
79829
79830
DU-ALL SAFETY
TRAINI}IG EXPEI,ISE
TRAIiII}IG EXPENSE
TRAINTNG EXPENSE
21613
INC.21631
21585
21713
21723
21948
21981
21997
22194
PAGE 7
4,670.00
1,086.30
320.00
380.00
120 - 00
440.47
33,077.00
4,914.29
2,375.40
2,389.64
11.71
CITY OF BURLII,IGA}IEIJARRANT REGISTER,t1/21/01
VENDOR DETAILt*' oenotes Hand Hritten Checks
ACCOUN]
00
00
00
101 66210 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
ARAI.IARK UN I FORI.I
UIII FORiIS A}ID
UNI FORIIS AND
UN I FORI.IS AND
UII I FORI{S AND
UN I TON S ANO
t01
526
527
619
620
&210
69020
(6520
64460
66700
868
401
401
SERVICES,
EOUI PI.{ENI
EQt', I PI.IENT
EOUI PI,IENT
EOUI PI,IEiIT
EOUI P}IEIIT
325.24
197,20
285,88
213.
63-',tz
140
140
140
140
140
21747
n825 EtBB AND ASSoCIATES, tNC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CIIIGULAR I'IRELESS
co,lr{,rN I cAT t 0|l s
79826 VB GOLF LLC
I.IISCELLANEOUS
RECREATIOI'I PROGRAiI EXPENSE
TRACY SI RI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
LISA COFFARO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CNRISSY HOLI.IES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
AT&T
UTILITY EXPEIISE
CUI.|I,IINS.ALLISOil CORPORATION
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IEIT
520.00 101 68010 220 1345
!80.00 101 68010 2?0 1546
120.00 101 68010 220 1342
140,87 101 66100 160
33,02,00 320 7A290 210
7 ,425,'t9
1,489.10
529 36716
529 ffi30 213
2,375.40 101 64420 210
10'l 66100 210
320 n390 210
1't,71 496 20281
3,582.05 101 64250 800
IEDA
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
79828 DGBA AIID ASSOCTATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECTALIZED S
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S
79831 J. J.R. CoNSTRUCTIOX
I.I I SCELLANECT,S
22212
55,710.00 731 22560
55,710,00
IIUiIBER NAI,IE AI4OUNT
3,582.05
21863
221!8
142,05
2,247 .59
CITY OF BURLINGAIEUARRAIIT REGISTER
11t21t01
VE},IDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tlEnd l.itten Checks
PAGE 6
AI.IOIJNT
2,522.18
177,20
2,508, oo
249.40
556 -72
125.00
309.95
7,660,01
1 ,51',t .68
61 .56
1,500.00
1 ,'198.88
79804
79805
706
79807
79809
79810
79811
79812
n813
79815
n816
RACOUET S}IITH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
79808 ARLETTE PETERSON
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DAVID T. O'KEEIE
}IISCELLANEOUS
UTILITY AERIAL I}IC
EOUIPI.IENT }IAI}IT.
AFFINITEL COI4I.IUN I CATIONS
CO}IMUNICATIONS
COUNTY OF SAN i|ATEO
ISC. SUpPL IES
DOROTHY L. LAI RD
COITTRACTUAL SERVICES
IIICRO UAREHOT,SE
CAPITAL EOUI PI.IEN]
ESA EIIVIRON}IE}ITAL SCI EXCE ASSOC
DEPOSIT REFUND
SHIRLEY HE t }IA}I
COI,IIRACTUAL SERVICES
REDIJOOO GARDE}/ I.IATERIAL
ISC. SUPPLIES
TIIE BAiIK OF I{EI,I YORK
CITY HALL }IAIIITENANCE
ACCOUNT
8,075.00 731 22560
2,522.4A 101 68020 200 2300
177.20 621 64t 50 160
2,508.00 101 68010 220 1582
249.40 101 6a010 220 1347
556.72 101 68010',t20 1320
125,00 101 68010 220 1589
309,95 527 66520 AOO
7,660,01 731 22590
354.72 101 68010 220 1231
1,51r.68 620 15000
61,56 101 58020 120 2300
1,500.00 1o't 64450 220
1,198.88 101 68010 220 1547
'19905
19990
20216
20339
20547
20548
20&2
?0706
21160
21216
21217
21439
2148179814 UNISOI,,RCE NORTHERII CAL DIVISIO}I
IIISCELLAI{EO'S EXPENSE 216,60 sZ6 69020 290
246,60
NU}I8ER NAI.IE
21204
8,075.00
354.72
7 14 REDIIO@ GENERAL TIRE
SUPPLIES
79817 FRISCO DEL ROSARIO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
21442
CITY OF EURLINGAXE9ARRANT REGISTER
'11t21/01
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks
PAGE 5
NUI.IBER NAI{E
79788
79789
79790
79791
79793
79794
79795
79796
79798
79799
79800
79801
79802
LIIIDA HOECK
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
HAROLD FIELDS
COXTRACTUAL SERVICES
irIKE Sr.r I Til
CO},ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
LASoN I r,lc.
I.I I SCE L LATI ECIJS
TOOLS EXPRESS
S}IALL T@LS
GEORGE I.IASTALIR
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I{ICHAEL ADAiI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
LY}I},IE F IRESTONE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
LAIIDFI LL SYSTEI.IS EIIGIIIEERING
PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S
IIATURCLEA}I
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
ANG iIEI'SPAPERS
utsc. SUPPLIES
LTESERT CASSIDY I,IH I TI{ORE
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
PRIORITY 1
SUPPLIES
JOHN CAHALAII, ASLA
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
15390
16637
17158
17661
18027
18088
1A275
1a746
18754
18830
19083
19095
19239
19561
ACCOUNT
2,060.00 101 68010 22O 1346
280.00 101 68010 220 1588
300.00 101 68010 220 1589
520,16 731 22518
168.00 101 68010 220 1588
517.11 t01 68020 t30 2200
275.00 101 58010 220 1589
252.00 101 68010 220 1588
960.00 101 68010 220 l25t
498.91 524 ffiOO 210
1,984.50 527 &520 120
90.50 101 64350 210
1,062.50 320 80140 210
AI.IOIJNT
2,060.00
280.00
300.00
520.56
168.00
517,11
275.00
252.0O
950.00
1 ,9a1.50
21 .60
90.50
50.36
1 ,052.50
79803 CIUCCI CONSULT I IIG GRC[,,P INC
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
19791 90-00 101 55300 220
90.00
21.60 101 54400 120
50.36 620 15000
498.91
79792 DENISE A. itCCoY
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
ftBa
CITY OF BURLINGAI'IEIIARRANT REGISTER
11/21t01
VENOOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lrritten checks
IIU}IBER NA}IE
79m
79776
797n
nn8
797n
79780
79781
79782
n783
79781
79745
10557
11561
tt6t0
11749
13613
13910
14021
14405
1/.855
15629
15815
101
101
101
526
527
527
619
620
&210
6E020
662'10
69020
66120
66520
61160
66700
120
192
222
120
120
'130
120
120
2?00
43-58
81.78
122.55
242.05
16.20
61 .42
450.47
11,37
ACCOUNT AI.iOIJNT
1 ,029.a2
971.00
'140,00
470.25
10.79
1,651.91
157.23
175,16
720.00
319,38
224.00
821.10
EI.IPLOYI.IENT OEVELOPI,IENT DEPARTI.IEN 10567
ISCELLAl,tEOt S
LEE SIA'iBOL I S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
971,00 150 21020
'140.00 101 68010 220 1588
170.25 101 68010 220 1344
10.n 101 66210 160
157.23 896 20281
175.16 619 64460 220 5170
720.00 101 6A010 220 1462
UILI.IA BURGESS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
RADIO SHACK
co,04uil I cAT I oN s
ARC ELECTRIC
BLDG. & GROJNDS I.IAINI.
AT&T
UTILITY EXPENSE
GERBOTH FIRE EXTI}IGUISHER CO.
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
I.IARK CERI.IY
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
ROYAL I,IHOLESALE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
100
?44
T II.I OLENO
COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
79786 BRTNK.S tNC.
BANKING SERVICE TEES
OFFICE EXPE}ISE
221.00 101 68010 220 1588
98
40
t20 80150 220
619 64460 120
415.00
406. t 0
101 64250 120
529 68050 0 4200
79787 TIOSS RUBBER & EOU I PI.IEIIT CORP.
TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE
16225
60 .37 10't 66210 260
.l
1,651.91 101 68010 190 1585
CAL-S]EA}I
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
I.iISCELLANEC[,lS
TRAFFIC CONTROL I.IATERIALS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I T SC, SUPPLIES
SiIALL T@LS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
l.l I sc. suPPLtEs
PAGE 4
60.37
CITY OF BURLI}IGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER
11t21t01
VET/DOR DETAI L.*' oenotes Hand Uaitten Checks
120 2200
130
120
120
130
'!20
'130
PAGE 3
AUOUNT
244.76
10,948.31
2,942.38
800- 00
1,411.59
349. 18
1 ,980. 18
160.00
225.00
NUI.IBER NAI.IE
n765
n766
79767
79769
79770
79771
EERNARD EOI'ARDS
COIITRACIUAL SERVICES
SEOUOIA U}IION HIGH SCH@L
OFTICE EXPEiISE
CITY HALL I.IAIiITEIIANCE
gESI GROUP PAYiIE}IT CTR. 03954
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
HoRIZOtl
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCOTJNT
244.76 10',t 54350 2r0
54.12 101 68,020 192 2200
10,948.31 320 71170 210
2,942.38 61A &520 601
800.00 101 68,010 220 1462
CALLAIIDER ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIOiIAL & SPECIALIZED S
79764 ABAG - LIABILITY
CLAIIIS PAYiIEXTS
09',t30
09461
09548
09670
09720
09790
1010 t
534.72
I11.1I
155.n
296,17
63.16
243,54
37,10
'10'l
101
320
526
326
619
619
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDI,'ARE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SI'IALL IOOLS
rSC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPL I ES
SI.IALL TOOLS
I,I t SC. SUPPLIES
SI,IALL T@LS
68020
66210
78r'90
69020
69020
64460
6t 150
309,18
40.00
621 64450 110
621 64450 200
79772
nZR AIIA F ITZGERALD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
79n4 DAiYL 0. JoltES, IttC.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
INTERSTATE TRAFFIC
}IISC. SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC CO}IIROL I.IATERIALS
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
ISC, SUPPLTES
101 66210 120
101 66210 222
101 66210 260
526 69020 120
112.86
1,503,56
273.24
90.72
'150.00 101 68010 220 1342
225.00 101 65200 220
09518
09975
54.42
CITY OT BURLTNGAI{ElIARRANT REGIS]ER
11/21/O1
VENDOR DETAIL
'*t oenotes Hand gritten Checks
PAGE 2
AI.,IOJNT
60.16
250.00
165,130.00
524.00
259.53
54.00
507.69
5,200.00
42,069.45
150.00
168,00
3 ,353.25
150.00
6,000.00
2,650,00
L. !t. cuRrts & soils
FIRE APPARATUS UAI }IT.
DULI}I ADVERTTSIIIG INC.
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERT IStiIO
US FILTER OPERAT ING SERVICES
COIITRACTIJAL SERV!CES
GE}IE EVANS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
HASELBACH SURVEYII,IG I}ISTRUI.IENT
TRAtNIiIG EXPENSE
K & Li OISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
KAVANAGH E}IGI NEERIIIG
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
79757 P. G. & E.
UTILITY EXPENSE
NUI.{BER tIAI.iE
79749
79750
79751
79752
79751
79?55
79756
79758
79760
n761
79762
79763
02027
02036
02110
02149
02248
02645
02665
03054
05168
03172
05175
03234
03366
ACCOUNT
60.16 10t 55200 203
230.00 10't 64420 150
156,150.00 527 66530 2?O
324.00 101 68010 220 1312
115.67
143.96
101 68020 120
619 64460 130
2200
STEPIiEN J. PICCH I
COIITRACIUAL SERVICES
79759 DOI,I PLAGI.{ANN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
03536
54.00 527 66520 260
507,69 619 6l,460 1ZO
3,200.00 326 79440 220
12,069,45 89'6 20280
168.00 101 68010 220 1588
1 50 . 00 621 &450 200
6,000.00 101 65200 220
2,650.00 526 69020 233
SANORA POEE
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
R&SERECTIOIIOF
CITY HALL I.IAINTENANCE
CITY OF SAII I.IATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SEAUOIA A}IALYTICAL LABS
ISCELLAXEqJS
797& TIIEERLIIIE TREE SERVICE, I C.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
03760 15,20t.98
79753 U.I,'. GRAINGER, INC.
IISC. SUPPL tES
SIIALL TOOLS
02410
150.00 101 68010 220 1580
3,353.25 101 58010 220 1340
15,205.98 tol 68020 220 2300
CI]Y OF BURL INGAI.IEL'ARRAXT REGISTER
11t21tO1
VEIIDOR DETAITr*r Denote6 Hand Hritteh Checks
PAGE 1
AI'IOUNT
11,336.74
395.25
200.00
2,517.70
?,677,91
869.41
66.79
305.64
430.00
1 ,691,65
267.12
NU}I8ER NAIIE
nB6
79737
79738
79740
79741
n742
79743
BAKER & TAYLOR COi.IPAI,IY
LIBRARY..B@KS AND XAPS
BARRY I.IILLS
STAIF & I.IEETINGS
JoAll [Axt N I
LISRIRY EXPENSES
SAiI }IATEO CREDIT UNIO}I
L I BRARY..TECORDS A}ID CASSETT
LtERARY--800rS AID ilAPS
DAHA},IUKAR BRANDES ARCHITECTS
PROFESSIOIAL & SPECIALIZED S
CII,IGULAR UIRELESS
coltltuil I cAT toils
0t 190
18683
19220
20303
2106r
21254
21747
01027
0'1052
01078
01663
01857
101
101
10'l
101
101
,26
526
527
65100
66210
55200
55200
55100
69020
69020
65520
110
120
130
203
703
120
130
130
ACCOUNT
11,336.74 101 67500 ',t29
395.25 101 67500 252
200.00 731 ?2531
2,517.70 101 67500 7O2
240
136
101 67500 125
101 67500 r?9
92
99
2
%9.41 320 80370 210
56.79 101 67500 160
ACE HARDI'ARE
OFTICE EXPEI|SE
}IISC. SUPPLIES
SI,IALL TOOLS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI IIT.
}IISCELLANECI,S
}IISC. SUPPLIES
S}IALL T@LS
S}IALL TOOLS
22.77
131.88
19.93
56.52
3.87
60.98
31 .15
32.72
79744 ALPINE A}'ARDS, INC.i sc. suPPLtEs
79745
79716
79747
A}I]ECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
EOUTPI.IEI{T I{A I NT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
201.00
229.00
101 65400 200
619 64460 2ZO 51'10
BURL I NGA}|E RECREATION DEPT.
RECREAI!OII EXPENSES
305.& 101 68010 120 1581
1,691.65 101 10700
267.12 620 15000
GCS }'ESTERN Pot'ER &
SUPPLIES
79714 CITY OF REDII@O CITY
colfl{uN I cAT t0[s
CTTY HALL I.IAINTENAIICE
400.00
19,834.00
621 64450 160
621 64450 220
20,214.OO
359.82
NBg CE I TROII I CS
}I I SCE L LA},I EdJS
0186?
t 1- t6-2001
CITY OF BURLIIIGAIIEUARRA}IT REGI STER
FUiID RECAP . 01-02
PAGE 1I
AI,4OUNT
96, 1.92
199,410.
97 ,636.U
24,696,
15,934.99
9,437.35
22,741,20
9,193.37
3,2&,37
422.97
133.56
9,429,9
8,2n.21
$497,835,65
t1t.o <>) c.,.
bq.z}> c,1?Aav) 4*
1 tlZo.ot-
GEiIERAL IUNO
CAPITAL II.IPROVEI,IENTS FU}ID
SEI.'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUNO
I,ATER FUND
SEI'ER FU}ID
GOLF CE}ITER FUND
SELT INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES TU}ID
EOUIP}IEIIT SERVICES FU}ID
INFOR}IATIOII SERVICES FUIID
FIRE }IECHAIIIC SERVICES FU}ID
TRUST AND AGEI{CY FU}ID
UIILITY REVOLVIIIG fU}ID
NAI,4E
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
FUND
't01
320
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
896
'14185
1q3s3'lqu*t
VOI D
VO. D
Vo ID
THIS IS TO
TIICLUSIVE,
TIIE AiI(UNT
OITICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
HOIIORABLE I{AYOR AND CITY C(UNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAI}IS LISTEO O}I PAGES iII,}IBERED fRO!.{ 1 THROUGII 11
4il0/0R cLAIlts IUIBERED FRor,r 79600 THRorrcH 79735 TNCLUSTVE,TOTALIIG tN
0F $497,835.65, I|AVE BEEX CHECKED Iil DETAIL AID APPRoVED By ]HE pROpER
AND III IiIY ()PIIIIOII REPRESE}IT FAIR AIID JUST CIIARGES AGATNST THE CITY INgITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS I}IDICATED IHEREOiI.
RESPECTFULLY SUSI{tTTED,
TIIIANCE OIRECIOR
APPROVED FOR PAY}IENT
DATE
DATECOIJNC I L
CITY OT BURLINGA}IEUARRAIIT REGI STER
11/',t6t01
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
lZ,ZZ
92.49
620 15000
620 66700 150
PAGE 10
AMOUI,IT
195.15
104.71
288.58
690.05
693.00
r,000.00
300 -00
160.00
149.362.00
815.50
177.00
$497,435.65
KAR PR@UC]S
SUPPLIES
silALL r@LS
79727 BAY REPROGRAPHICS
}IISC. SUPPLIES
GREG iIILANO
IRAINIIIG EXPEI{SE
SIX CqJNTIES FIRE PROTECT ION
PROFESSIO}TAL & SPECIALTZED S
NUiIEER NAI.IE
n725
79726
79724
79729
nai
79731
79732
79733
79734
TOTAL
ACCOUNT
495.45 101 65500 260
EiI(A LEIJITT
TRAINING EXPENSE
ELLIOTT I IVEST}IEN] GROUP
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
i ilt slEN
DEPOSIT REFUIIDS
I,I I I,IA DEES
COTITRACTUAL SERVICES
AT&T BROADBA}ID
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23343
23315
23316
23348
23349
23550
23352
23353
288.58 101 64400 120
590.05 101 65500 260
693,00 6',19 61160 210 51AO
1,000.00 731 22520
300.00 731 22520
160.00 101 68010 220 1452
't19,362.00 320 80250 220
815.50 520 75110 120
177.00 101 64420 ?40
FLA@irE. C0
I,II SC. SUPPLIES
79735 ETIPLOYER RESOURCE I}ISTITUTE,INC
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
23347
23344
23351
CITY OF BURLIXGAXE
L'ARRANT REGISTER
11116101
VEIIDOR DETAILr*. Denotes Hand Uritten checks
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
638.00
400.00
824.00
2,0n.14
3,300.00
15 ,922.60
690.00
690.00
241.12
88-28
99.95
185.85
2,115.00
702.90
500.00
SEA}I KEI GHRAN
DEPOSIT REFUIIDS
79714 CYBERNEI COIISULTING, I}IC.
PROfESSIO'IAL & SPECIALIZED S
}IERIT RESdJRCE GROIJP
I.I I SC, SUPPLIES
T, RANDOLPH GRAI{GE
I.IISCELLAXECUS
KEY RESOURCES
TEI.IPORARY E}IPLOYI{ENT SVC.
JO ANN C@PER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JOII}I XIELY
TRAINING EXPEIISE
CHARLES SIERRA
TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE
I.ICKESSON GENERAL I.IED I CAL
SUPPLIES
ltoiTRAx
SUPPLIES
79719 A.8. S.
EOUI PI.IETT I.iAINT.
ACCoUNT
638.00 101 64420 120
400.00 7i1 22525
824,00 101 55500 011
2,077.14 101 64250 220
3,500,00 731 22520
15,922.60 320 79400 210
590-00 101 65100 260
690.00 101 65100 260
88.28 620 15000
99.95 101 65300 200
185,85 526 69020 210
2,115.00 618 64520 038
702.90 101 65500 260
500.00 731 22525
IIUI.IBER NAI4E
79709
79710
79711
79712
n713
79715
79716
79717
n718
79720
79723 FORD SIBLEY
IIISCELLANE(n,S
I.IETROTECH
PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALTZED S
79721 SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATIO 23339
I.I I SCELLAIEqJS
23076
23112
23139
23204
23232
23234
23249
23250
23275
?3335
23335
23337
23310
23341
79722 XARCO CAVALIERI
IRATXI}16 EXPENSE
79724 r. co ilI FFE
IISCELLA]lEqJS
23342
50- 00 Ti1 22525
241.12 101 65200 112
50.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
UARRAIIT REGt STER
't'v16t01
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks
50
00
529 36717
529 68030 213
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
2,348.50
8,243.50
841.49
310.36
500,00
392.25
5,150.00
172.53
18,840.00
280.00
8,954.00
/+85 .80
920.85
XUI.IBER NAI.IE
79591
79695
79696
79698
79699
79700
79701
79702
79703
79704
79705
79706
79707
ACCOUilT
2,348.50 619 64460 220 5190
A&LJANITORIALSERVICE
COIITRACTUAL SERVTCES
VB GOLF LLC
IiISCELLAilEO,S
RECREAIIOI PROGRTII EXPEIISE
VERIZON t,'IRELESS
COiII.IUN I CAT IONS
GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
ABSOLUTE CELLULAR
cct{r{ul I cAt Iolls
JEIIKINS/ATHENS INS
CLAII{S ADJUSTING SERVTCES
PENINSULA UIII FOR}I & EOUIPI{ENT
UN I TORI.IS AND EOUIPilENT
AI{ERI CAN TURF SERVICES
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
21936
?1948
22006
22089
22151
22178
22667
22668
22676
22812
22851
22499
22975
3,966.32
14,8rJ.64
697
516
6
1
GIIAC PAYIIE}IT PROCESSING CENTER
CAPI TAL EOUIPI.IENT
79697 ARCH YIRELESS
co,tru[lcATtoils
SOUTIIIIO@ PLUI{BING
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
ROBENTS AND BRUIIE
xtsc. suPPLtEs
S''IITH GROI,P JJR
PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S
8/'t,49 101 66100 800
310.36 101 66210 160
300,00 731 22520
3,150.00 320 75110 210
172-53 101 68020 160 2300
101 56100 210 3001
526 69020 210
THE }IEIRIE OLDE CHRIST}IAS CAROLE 22584
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 101 68010 220 1452
275.40 r01 68020 160 2200
8,954.00 618 64520 225
920.85 529 68030 120
7970a IIG LEGALS
PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERI I SINC
23021 73.42 101 64200 150
73.42
275.40
392,25 527 (6.520 120
485,80 10r 65200 140
CITY OF BURLIIIGA}IE
IJARRANT REGISTER
11/16t01
VENOOR DETAIL,*r Denotes Hshd tlritten Checks
PAGE 7
Ali0ul,lT
526.21
200.00
1 , 130.38
90.72
530.00
1 ,065 .99
955,50
83.12
275.00
175.00
45.00
12,108.50
87.29
'l ,075 .00
NUI,IBER NAI.IE
79679
79680
79681
796€'2
79683
79681
79645
796€,6
79687
79ffi
796A9
79690
79691
79692
GE CAPITAL
EoutPIEIT itAl[T.
CIIRISTT}IA LEIJIS
COIITRACTTIAL SERVICES
CARTER I}IDUSTRIES INC.
SI,IPPL I ES
FRAIICoTYP-PoSTALtA, lNC.
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
0x cAr,tERA PRooUCTIo S
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
PEEK TRATFTC
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
JAC(IE COOPER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
cITICoiP VEITDOR t It{AitCE, I}lC,
EOUIPI.IEIT iIAII{T.
FI LTERTRESH COFfEE EXCELLENCE
BLDG. & GRCI,ilDS I.IA I }TT.
PORTOSAiI
RENTS & LEASES
UALT TOHNERT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SKYHAI]KS SPORTS ACADEI.IY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CINGULAR I'IRELESS
cs{}ru}l I cAT I or,rs
EI LEE}I P. GOLOEIIBERG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20390
20673
20967
21177
21317
21469
21623
21656
21711
21747
218r',6
ACCOUNT
200.00 101 58010 220 1452
90.72 101 65100 220
530.00 101 64560 210
81 .87
38/.,12
10't &240 210
320 AO232 220
955.50 101 68010 220 1342
83.12 101 65200 200
275-OO 621 &450 190
175.00 529 68050 180 4400
45.00 101 68010 220 1581
12,108.50 l0't 68,010 220 1347
a7.29 526 69020 160
1,075.00 101 58010 220 1346
n693 SA},I I4ATEO CO,,I{TY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897
I,IISCELLANEOUS 15,850.00 101 37010
'13,850,00
20216 526.21 101 61250 200
1,130,38 620 15000
21521
21701
CITY OF BURL I I,IGAI.IE
I'ARRA}IT REGISTER
11116/01
VENDOR OETAILrl' Denotes Hard Uritten Checks
PAGE 6
AI.iCT',NT
1 ,OO4.4O
678.00
I ,070.02
382.50
162.44
228.80
107.90
334.07
5.610,94
45.36
471,65
28,815.1'
2,n8.20
385.00
STEVEN BAU}I
C€IITRACTUAL SERVICES
79ffi ACCESS UIII FOR}IS & EI,IBROIDERY
UII I FORI,IS AND EOUIPI{EiIT
IIYSTER SALES CO}IPAIIY
STREET RESURFACII{G EXPENSE
LABOR READY, INC.
]EIIPORARY E}IPLOYI'IENT SVC.
VALLEY CREST TREE CO}IPATY
ISCELLAIIE(IIS
PREFERRED ALLIA}ICE
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
BURTOIIIS FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS TAI}IT.
ACCoUIIT
1,004.40 101 66.210 226
678.00 526 69020 011
1,070.02 731 22560
162-44 527 66520 140
224.40 101 64420 210
107.90 101 65200 220
NU}I8ER NAI.iE
79664
79665
79666
79667
79669
79670
79672
79674
n675
I AGE AXT INC.
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
I.I I SCE L LAT EqJS
220.00
114.07
320 71030 120
320 80190 210
4,492.91
718.03
101 65300 220
731 2251a
1&70
14659
18713
18959
'18990
19025
19027
19083
19145
19205
19366
19397
19561
19710
I'ILSEY & HAI.I
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALTZED S
79676 PO'ER gASHING SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
796n ALL FENCE CoIPA]IY, rirc.
Pt,{P EOUIPI.IEIIT REPAIR
45.36 101 64100 290
47',1.65 101 65200 205
28,816.',t3 320 78290 210
2,n8.20 101 66210 210
385 -00 527 66520 230
79678 AoN RrS( SERVICES lilC
IIISCELLINEOUS
20100 3,406.00 618 64520 038
3,406.00
382.50 101 68010 220 1580
79671 AilG ilET.ISPAPERS
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALIzED S
79673 A}IBIAXCE TLORAL STUDIO
I.I I SCELLAI{EOUS IXPENSE
NUI.IBER NAI.IE
79650
79651
79652
79653
79654
79655
79656
79657
79658
79659
79660
79661
7962
GOLDEII NURSERY
I.I I SC, SUPPLIES
ilISC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLTES
101 68020 120
320 78l.90 120
526 69020 120
PAGE
'
AH0UltT
73.37
582.58
161.59
532.45
38.8a
240.36
319.68
153.58
1,023.50
200.00
1,350.00
223.25
199.00
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes Hsnd Llritten Checks
79&9 u{,NICIPAL I.IAIiITENA}ICE
SUPPLIES
1691 't
17128
17141
17402
17414
17153
17497
17546
't7547
17938
18078
18103
18321
73.37 620 15000
582,58 101 68020 140 2500
cmTAs coRP. #464
UNI FORIIS A}ID EOUIP}IENT
220043.16
.11
27.9
CALI FOR},IIA COIISERVAT ION CORPS
III SCELLAIIEq'S EXPETSE
IIETRO }IO8I LE Cq{iUNICATIOilS
EoutPilElrl r,rAml.
PRTDE PAINT
8LDG. & GROUNDS IlAtNT.
RO, C E[VtnON E]ITAL
STREET RESURFACIXG EXPEIISE
COLORPRI}IT D IGITAL
OFFICE EXPEIISE
OTFICE EXPEiISE
II I -TECII EI.IERGENCY VEIIICLE
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAIIIT.
IIRE APPARATUS I,IAIIIT.
PIO}IEER RA}IDUSTRIAL
EoUIP EIIT AIllt-
CAL I FORIIIA MUII I CI PAL
OFTICE EXPEIISE
PARA!,IOUNf I S GREAT AI.IERI CA
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
CRANE PEST CONTROL
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
INSTTTUTE OF TRANSPORTAT IO}I
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
5,000.00 l0l 65200 290
,32.45 r01 65100 200
38.88 101 68020 190 2200
240.36 101 66210 226
100.98
218,70
101 64420 110
526 69020 110
198,22
-6t4.&
tol 55200 203
625 65213 203
1,023.30 101 68010 200 1586
200.00 101 61250 110
223.25 619 64160 210 5110
199,00 101 66100 240
n663 SIERRA }IOREIIO I.IERCANTI LE CO.
SI.IALL IOOLS
18357
119.56 101 68020 150 2300
119.56
CI]Y OF BURLINGAI.IEHARRANT REGISTER
11/16t01
15629
ACCOUNT
5,000.00
1,350.00 101 68010 220 1212
CITY OF BURLINGA}IE
LIARRA}IT REGISTER
'lt 116/01
VENDOR DETAIL.*' Denotes Hard gritten Checks
PAGE 4
NUI'IBER IIAI.IE
79631
79635
79538
79639
79643
79645
CRAIG }'. REED
COTITRACTUAL SERVICES
ACCOUNT
791.00 101 68010 220 '1581
4n.01 527 6[,520 120
176.95 101 &210 120
240,00 101 66?10 120
53.17 619 54460 210 5180
1,398.38 731 22560
359.36 101 68020 190 2200
4,082.03 101 30400
6.85 526 69020 110
402,00 101 54420 z',t0
ALERT D@R SERVICE, I },IC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALIZED S
85.00
30.00
101 68020 210
619 &460 210 5150
09881
'10059
10077
10256
11020
11773
13713
14592
11750
14957
15250
15427
16225
AMOUITT
791.00
115,00
1n.01
176.95
210.00
53.17
'1 ,398.38
369.36
4,082.03
6.85
402.00
71 .72
195.52
270,25
79636 3T EoUIPilEt{T C0.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
79637 AUqjST SUPPLY, lltc
'IISC.
SUPPLIES
DOROTIIY OI GRADY
ilISC. SUPPLIES
CO.II.IAIR I.{ECHAII I CAL SERVICES
PROfESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
79640 EOETIII}IG TREELAND FARI.IS, INC.
I.IISCELLAilEOIJS
79612 HIIIDERLITER, DE LLAI.IAS
I.IISCELLAilEqJS
I{ICHAEL'S REIITALS I}IC.
OFTICE EXPEXSE
N&4 PARKII{ SECURTTY COIISULTA}ITS
PROFESSIOITAI & SPECIALIZED S
I'I LLBRAE LOCK SHOP
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
79616 r.r D LIIE]I SERVICE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
79647
'r0SS
RUBBER & EClt lPllEllT CORP.
TRAI}II}IG EXPE}ISE
24$101 68020 't20 2200
620 15000
7
61
195.52 101 65200 220
270,25 527 66520 260
79518 CO4I.IU}I I IY GATEPATH
PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL!ZED S
16575 217-50 101 6.210 210
217 .50
N&1 IORIHERN CAL I FORNIA
BLDG. & GRqJTDS I.IAINT.
15739
CITY OF BURLINOUEl,ARNANT REG I STER
11t16t01
VENDOR DETAIL
'*' oenotes Hand trritten Checks
101
t0t
101
101
101
t0l
101
101
529
E1
68010
68010
68020
680t0
68010
64100
68020
68020
68030
22545
101 68020
tot 68020
10t 68020
101 68020
101 55200
PAGE 3
A C[rNT
3,m.71
792.18
558.63
183 - 50
I ,088.00
53,52
8,256.20
2,310.a0
198,20
ACC(rJNT
03910
79621 ALLSTAR RE EOUtpr{ENT, IilC.
CAPITAL EOUI PiIENT
03938
79625
EURLIIIGA}IE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OFFICE EXPEIISE
I,I I SC. SUPPLI ES
U}I I FOR!{S A}ID EOUIPMENT
8LDG, & GRot XDS t{ IilT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
]RAVEL & I{EETI}IGS
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
CAPITAL EOUIPI{EIIT
BLDG. & GRqJNDS MAIilT.
tScELLAItECUS
NUiISER NA}IE
n623
79625
79631
79632
531 .02
935.06
167 -40
717.40
396.
55.90
365,34
'183.59
98,00
327.11
110
120
140
190
220
250
260
800
190
1100
1100
2200
1100
1314
2300
2100
4200
n2.14 101 65200 800
LY}IGSO GAROEN I,IATERIALS
it I sc. suPPLtEs
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SAFETY KLEEN CORP.
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
ABAG . LIABILITY
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECTALIZEO S
CLAII,IS PAYIIE}ITS
OLE IS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IA I IIT.
208
359
101 68020 120 2200
526 69020 120
09'143
09518
09626
89
74
09164
79627 TES]IXG E}IGI NEERS, INC.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
09?70
n6z8 E|ITERTAIIIilENT PUBLICATtONS, INC,
COITRACTUAL SERVICES
09538
79629 STERICYCLE, I C.
SUPPLIES
09439
79630
181.50 620 66700 120
536.00 320 78290 220
1.088.00 101 68010 220 1212
53.52 101 65200 112
2,626.03
5,640.17
514 64520 210
614 64520 @1
sAN IATEO LA]'X r.rouER SfioP
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROIIIOS }IAINT.
EOUI PI.IENT I{AINT.
CAPITAL EOUIPI{ENT
2200
2200
2100
2200
70.76
253.34
80.63
180.23
1 ,725,U
120
't30
't90
200
800
198.20 625 65213 203
09790
2&.OO 101 6r.210 120
264.00
536.00
09560
79633 TNTERSTAIE IRAFFIC
xlsc. suPPLlEs
CITY OF BURL I IIGAI.IE
[,ARRA}IT REGISTER
11t',l6t01
PAGE 2
NU}IBER NAI.IE
79614
79615
n616
79614
79619
n620
n621
79622
ACCOUNT
157.60 620 15000
5?6 69020 '120
526 69020 803
10t 65200 203
620 '.t 5000
620 66700 120
AMOUNT
157.60
8,264.92
400,94
217 .O8
163.67
t 0.23
8,275 .21
312.78
9,636.44
422.00
246.62
79613 US IILTER
II I SC. SUPPLIES
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
INC.
02880
02898
03002
03041
0305/r
03080
05380
03571
6,395,55
1 ,U9,37
III LLBRAE LU}IBER CO.
usc. SUPPLIES
SIIALL T@LS
BLDG. & GRCUNDS I,IAI}IT.
SIDEgALK REPAIR EXPENSE
101 &210 120
'10't 55200 130
tol 66020 190 2200
101 &210 219
12,a2
88.05
20.09
279.98
IIATIONI'IOE UIRE & BRUSH MFG.
EOUIPIIENT ilA I NT.
PACI FIC NURSERIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.IISCELLANEOI,,S
79617 P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
PACI FIC BELL
UTILITY EXPENSE
PATTERSON PARTS, I IIC
FIRE APPARATUS
'IAINT.SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
PI,I'P REPATR SERVICE CO.
PU}IP EOUIPI.IEI'T REPAIR
SAN I.IATEO COUIITY EIIVI RO}.IiIENTAL
tl l sc. suPPLlEs
217,08 101 56210 200
10.23 527 66520 170
a,275.21 896 20281
81 .26
200.71
50.81
166,07
.19
-6,O1
97 .25
&.42
101 58020 120 2200
7t1 22560
101 66100 110
101 66100 t20
526 69020 120
9,636,44 527 66520 230
422.00 620 66700 1?O
STYLINE SUPPLY CO.,
OFTICE EXPEISE
III SC. SUPPLIES
!r l sc. suPPLtEs
VENDOR OETAIL
'*i Denotes Hsnd Uritten checks
79612 HoUARD JollES BATTERIES, rNC. 02625
SUPPLIES
03106
03197
CITY OT BURLINGAI.{E
[,ARRA}IT REGISTER
11t16/01
VEI,IDOR DETAIL.*. Denotes Hand llritten Checks
1,332.50
349.03
5,809.86
547.97
376.60
2,717 .96
879,80
4,000.00
ACCOJNT
101 680',t0
101 68010
101 68010
101 58010
PAGE 'I
AMOUNT
8,039.36
513,69
1 ,005. 14
7,974,36
1 ,875.00
61.40
998.38
2,517.7O
1 ,200.00
101,629.80
204.92
NUI.IBER }IAI.IE
79600
79601
79602
79603
n601
79605
n606
n60a
79609
79610
HARBOR SANO & GRAVEL
IIISC. SUPPLIES
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
BREIITON SAFETY, INC.
TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE
TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE
CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IE
OFFICE EXPENSE
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
COX'RACTUAL SERVICES
CAPI TAL EOUIPTIEIIT
408.35
105.34
101 66210 120
527 &5ZO 120
101 65210 260
527 66520 2@
ACT IOiI CLEANING SERVICE
TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOYIIEIIT SVC.
EOUIP}IE}IT iIATNT.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
8LDG. & GR(I,INOS I.IAIIIT.
101 55100 011
101 65400 200
619 64160 220 5110
621 &450 190
01030
01315
01400
01857
02027
02036
02041
021'10
110
120
220
800
1100
1323
1100
1100
503.07
503.07
L. N. CURTIS & SONS
UNI FOR}iS AiID EOU I PI.IEIIT
CAPITAL EOI'I P}IE}IT
79607 DULItt ADVERTISIIiG lllc.
PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERTI SING
LEAGUE OF CALIFORI{IA CI T IES
TRAVEL & IIEETII,IGS
GCS }IESTERN POIIER &
SUPPLIES
IIACEK DENIIAOT,I
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
1,875.00 101 65200 250
61.40 620 15000
255.25
743.13
101 65200 140
620 66700 800
1,200.00 101 58010 220 1347
US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81D6. & GRCI'NDS I,IAIIIT.
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
636
883
109
327 79440 210
527 &530 190
527 66530 210
[,,[,, GRAI]IGER, l llc,
BLDG. & GR(IJI{OS }IAIiIT.
}IISC. SUPPLTES
169.33
55.59
101 65200 190
619 &460 120
54
38
97
3
02244
05
139.97
545.94
't0't 66210 219
101 &210 226
685.91
t'
2,517.70 101 64120 150
01624
01745
79611 GRA}IITE R@X CO}IPANY
SIOEI'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFACING EXPE}ISE
02261
STAFF REPORT
ro: HONORABLE MAYOR AI\ID CITY COIINCIL
DATE: I)ecember28r200l
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE L/7 /02
9e
BY
BYFRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/
Administrative Seryices Director
650-558-7222
SUBJECT: STATUS OF RCN FIBER CABLE INSTALLATION
RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only, and no Council action is required at this time.
BACKGROUND: In August 2000, Council adopted a cable system franchise agreement with RCN Telecom
Services. The agreement provided for installation of a fiber optic cable system offering telephone, cable TV
and Internet services to residents. The franchise included a planned installation schedule that spanned six
years, with the majority of the installation occurring in the first four years. Year l, which has just been
completed, promised l5 "nodes", the neighborhood units that serve approximately 150 residences.
RCN's status report is attached. They have completed 23 nodes, and await a final decision by PG&E
regarding electric meter placement, at which time the nodes can be activated. The attached map shows the
service area that has been completed. No work has commenced beyond the area shown in blue on the map.
The schedule for the remaining installation of nodes is as follows:
2002 20 nodes
2003 20 nodes
2004 15 nodes
5 nodes
5 nodes
2005
20a6
The recession has taken a heavy toll on telecommunications companies, and RCN has been retrenching along
with the others. In discussing this report with RCN stafi it is apparent that a lingering recession will impact
the company's ability to secure financing in the capital market. San Carlos, Belmont and Millbrae face the
same prospects with RCN, since they adopted their agreements at the same time we did, as part of a joint
negotiation. RCN staffhas conveyed this information to James Quinn, the Burlingame residint who has
expressed interest in the progress of their installation.
At this point, RCN is in compliance with their franchise, and the only reason for delay is related to pG&E's
meter issue. RCN estimates this will be resolved and service will be activated in the next three months. I will
continue to monitor progress and keep in contact with the other cities involved in construction with RCN. The
anniversary date of the agreement is November 9, the date on which the letter of credit was submitted.
ATTACHMENTS: Map of RCN Construction Progress
RCN Letter,12-21-2001
RCN Services Pamphlet
C: David Hankin, Vice President, RCN Telecom Services
David A. Hankin
Vice President
Regulatory & Govemnrent
1400 Fashion Island Blvd.Suitelo0
San Mateo U 94404
(6so) 212-8010
Fax (650) 212-8009
December 2I,2OOI
Mr. Rahn Becker
Assistant City Manager
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010-3997
Dear Mr. Becker:
This letter serves to provide the City of Burlingame ("City") a report on the status of RCN providing cable television,
high speed internet access, and local and long distance services to the residents ofthe City.
RCN has constructed and is ready to activate approximately 3000 homes in the City. The area where RCN has
constructed is highlighted in blue on the attached map. Whereas our franchise agreement requires construction of 15
nodes in the first year, the blue area represents completion of23 nodes.
RCN has been ready to activate its system and serve customers since August 2001. However, the reason RCN has not
been able to provide our services in Burlingame, to date, has been the inability to have our power supplies turned on by
Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E"). In January of 2001, PG&E changed its policies with respect to metering power
supplies and notified its potential customers that as of May 2OOl, a new metering process would be implemented. Prior
to May 2001, PG&E had not required power supplies to be metered. Apparently, PG&E believes they are losing revenue
from charging a flat rate and consequently, decided that metering was a more accurate measure of power usage.
To date, PG&E has not completed the implementation of the new metering process. RCN is continuing to work out
metering issues with PG&E. These issues include height and type of meter pans to be located on the poles, as well as
the procedures for the review and activation of power supplies. We are optimistic that the metering issues for the first
construction phase will be resolved within the next three or four weeks and we will then be able to provide the City with
our services by March 2002.
RCN's plans to construct and activate the second phase of our network are subject to the availability of capital from the
public markets. We are hopeful that the current economic downturn will ease in the coming year and the capital markets
will, once again, be providing capital for economic development.
Enclosed for your information are copies of the various costs saving packages that we will be offering Burlingame
residents. We look forward to providing our iuray of cable television and telecommunications services to the City in the
near future.
Sincerely
fl^,Z{"-b"-'
David Hankin
Enclosures
,/dl fr{H€38 Srut,
f,r't'Bl]M
BJruNGAME
CALFOffI.{A
IW
4TH OUARTEB
2OO1 STATUS
BURLINGAME
LEGEND
@ 1sr oTR. 2oo2
COMMERCIAL AREA/MULTI-DWELLING UNITS *
I TBD
* coNSTRUcTIoN PENDING AccESS AGREEMENTS
+Iq
n
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
i
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 1t7 t2002
9t
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
BY
DATE: December 31.2001 Mr
FROM: Larrv E. Anderson. Citv Attomev
STjBJECT:
APPROVE UNIT REDUCTION FOR ASSESSMENT BASIS FOR BEL.MATEO MOTEL
FROM 32 UNITS TO 23 UNITS UNDER THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve reduction in unit count for assessment basis for Bel-Mateo Motel from32 units to 23 units
DISCUSSION:
At the November 19,2001, meeting the Council adopted the assessments for the 2002 year for the San Mateo
County Tourism Business Assessment District.
Unfortunately, the assessment for the Bel-Mateo Motel was based on a total of 32 rooms, and the Motel has
informed us that there are actually only 23 rooms for rent.
Therefore, it is recommended that the assessment basis count be reduced from 32 rooms to 23 rooms, which will
save the Motel about $400 in assessments. This will have no effect on the assessments for any other hotels in
the District.
Distribution
Bel-Mateo Motel
Finance Director, City of Belmont
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
BY
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION I.'NAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingarne, CA
December 10,2001
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 10, 2001, regular meeting of the
Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. SEATING OT'I\IEW COMMISSIONERS
chairman vistica thanked commissioners chuck Mink and Karen Key for
their three and a half months of temporary service to the commission while
council recruited to fill the two seats permanently. outgoing c. Mink
thanked the commission for the opportunity, complementing the Council on
their selection of a beard and the stamina of youth for his replacement, he
noted he would continue to follow the progress of the commission and
community. Chairman Vistica then introduced the two new commissioners
being seated, Christopher Keele and Michael Brownrigg.
[I. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keele, Keighran, and
Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Osterling
StaffPresent: city Planner, Margaret Monroe; planner, Erika Lewit; city
Attorney, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza
rV. MINUTES The minutes of the November 26,2001meeting regular of the planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
v. APPROVAL oF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
VI. X'ROM THE TLOOR Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, spoke noting that a parking lot has been
installed across the sheet from her on the Sisters of Mercy property. She
believes this development violates the open Space Element of the General
Plan. In addition, the added parking will aggravate the traffic at the
congested intersection and create unsafe conditions. She received no notice
from the City of the work that was proposed.
\TII. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
YI[. STUDY ITEMS
1. 1443 IIOWARD AYENUE _ ZONED R.3/C-I - APPLICATION FOR VARTANCE FOR HEIGHT OFFREESTANDING SIGN (CHARLES L. KAVANAGH,APPLICANT; TJNITED METHODIST CHURCH
OF BURI PROPER TY OWNER)PLANNER: RI HTIRIN
CP Monroe presented a surnmary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: ifthe applicant has considered
reversing the location ofthe reader board and the name of the Church on the propor"d sign, so that the sign
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
could be reduced to 6 feet in height and the variance for the height of the sign could be eliminated, the
name of the church appears on other signs on that street frontage so identification on this sign is less
important. There were no other comments from the commissioners.
This item was set for the regular action calendar on January 14,2002, all the information has been submitted
and reviewed by the Planning Department in time. This item concluded at7:16 p.m.
2. 1177 AIRPORT BOULEVARD _ ZONED C-4 _ APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO EXCEED THE BAYFRONT DESIGN
GUIDELINES AND FOR CONTROLLED PARKING FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN
EXISTING HOTEL (JONATHAN WINSLOW, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, APPLICANT; NADEL
ARCHITECTS, INC., ARCHITECT; AIRPORT BOULEVARD HOTEL LLC, PROPERTY OWNER)
PROJECT PLANNER:]BEN HURIN
CP Monroe presented a sunmary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: is the applicant proposing to
put an new fence around the entire site, and will the new fence include landscaping along its entire length;
how will the hotel's parking work in conjunction with sporting events at the adjacent park, please describe;
there seems to be a lot of lighting proposed for the hotel parking lot, especially the "tree lights", how much
glare will be created and will it be visible offthe site; applicant should present samples ofthe windowMylar
proposed and review the pattern suggested; glad to see that there will be a new fence along the freeway
frontage of the site, this should be coordinated with the city's work with CalTrans and the freeway
improvements being considered including at the entrance of the hotel, the present fence is dilapidated and
the landscaping neglected, can the applicant enter into an agreement with CalTrans to install and maintain
the landscaping; concerned about the lack of landscaping on the site, vines are not proposed for all the
fencing, how will the applicant guarantee good quality well maintained landscaping on the entire perimeter
ofthesite. Staffshoulddocumenthowthefrontlandscapinggotfrom80%requiredto3}o/oandnow to9Yo
with this project; the applicant should show the progressive reductions in landscaping on a plan and explain
why the current reduction is necessary.
Commission comments continued: the applicant should work with the baseball league and city to set out a
list of objectives for the parking arrangement with Bayside Park users i.e. such things as free, easily
accessible, open to the public and number of parking spaces available; there are discrepancies between the
parking shown on the plans and the numbers in the staff report, correct. The applicant should address in
detail why they chose the design of the new roof screen which has a bigger impact than the existing
mechanical penthouse screen; why was the shape chosen, a curve for example would look less lopsided;
what will the landscaping at the front of the site look like from the street, some of the landscaping within the
parking lot will be and look artificial (plants in cages and lamp trees). Would like to see a photometric study
of lighting on the site, how will the main block of the building be lit, would not like to see flood lighting of
the structure. Project could improve safety and access to Bayside Park if a second gate into the park were
put at the entry driveway, since parents will cross the street the cross walks these could be marked better;
why are landscape items being put in cages; would like more information on the ultimate sizelscale of the
poplar trees and how they will scale against the eucalyptus tree backdrop, the fabric tuees should be included
in the scale analysis. There were no further comments from the commission.
This item was set for the next regular action calendar after the additional information has been submitted and
reviewed by the Planning Department. This item eorcluded at 7:35 p.m.
-2-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
IX. ACTION ITEMS
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CINSIDERED To BE RIUTINE. THEY ARE
ACTED ON SIMULTANEOUSLY WLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/ORACTION IS RESUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PRIOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON THE MOTION
TO ADOPT.
Chairman Vistica asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. There were no requests.
3. 1204 BURLINGAME AVENUE _ ZONED C.1, SUBAREA A _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR A REAL ESTATE USE (NICOLAS KOROS, APPLICANT; KIRKBRIDE FAMIL Y,
C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staffreport, Commissioners
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Boju6s Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion
and it passed 6-0- I (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item conclu ded at 7 :43
p.m.
X. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
4.1321 SAIICITEZ AVEI\ITIE - ZOIIED R.2 - APPLICATION FOR SPECI.AL PERMIT FOR DECLINING
HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND SECOND FLOOR SIDE SETBACK VARI,ANCE FORA SECOND STORY
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE.FAMILY HOUSE (NAN CROLEY, JOHN MATTHEWS
ARCHITECTS,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; RONALD AND KIM RAMSEY PROPERTY
OWNER ) (68 NOTICED)PI,ANNER:RUBEN HIIRIN
Reference staff report,l2.10.0l, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Jack Matthews, architec! was present to answer questions
about the project. He noted that the muntins of the family room window setlt apart from the rest of the
house, so he chose not to repeat this design element in the other windows ofthe house; the railing at the rear
was changed to add some decorative elements, but it was felt that a heavy balustrade, sucht the one
existing at the front porch, could not be supported by the architecture at the rear elevation; the design of the
house requires a special permit because the lot is narrow; the side setback variance is minor and the froposedsetback is actually greater than the setback that would be allowed ifthis R-2 property were developed with a
duplex.
There were no furttrer comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: the design of the house has evolved nicely and the applicant has addressed the
changes requested by the Commission. The variance is justified because of the small size ofthe lot and the
design of the dwelling is improved by the request for a special permit to exceed the declining height
envelope.
-J-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: l) that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November
15, 2001, sheets A-El, A-E2, A-2.l,and A-3.3, and date stampedNovember 29,2001, sheetA-3.1;2)that
the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Offrcial's, and Recycling Specialist's November 5,
2}}l,memos shall be met; and 3) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building
Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was
seconded by C. Auran.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-l (C. Osterling
absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:52 p.m.
5. 1509 HOWARD AVENUE _ ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT
SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JIRAYR KOUROUYAN,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; KAM^ATL TABIB, DYNAMIC DESIGNS, DESIGNER) (65
NOTICED)PT,ANNER: CATHERINE ,ON
Reference staff report, 12.10.01, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Kamal Tabib, designer, was present to answer questions. The
Commission asked if the windows shown are true divided lights. The designer noted that the window type
true divided lights was included on the revised plans and that hopefully the owner would install the correct
windows. The Commission commented a condition of approval should be added to insure that true divided
light windows are used.
There were no frrther comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: the applicant has made many changes to this project and has complied with the
requests for a 6'-0" porch and landscaping.
C. Boju6s moved to approve the application, by resolution and with an added condition that all windows be
true divided light windows, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as
shown on the plans submiued to the Planning Departrnent date stamped October 12,2001Sheets Al,A2, 44,
and date stamped November 2g,2OOl Sheets A3 and Ll;2) that the conditions of the City Engineer, Chief
Building Official andRecycling Specialistmemosdated October22,200l andNovember 15,2001 shall be
met; 3) that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope ofthe
first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area ofthe structure, replacing or
relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design
review; 4) that all the windows on the approved plans, shown as true divided light windows, shall be
installed as the true divided light windows; and 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Califomia Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was
seconded by C. Keighran.
Comment on the motion: approval includes findings for the proposed front setback variance; the variance is
justified because it is less of an encroachment than the original project and because the design of the house I
and its fit in the neighborhood are improved by thepresence of a porch.
C. Boju6s agreed to the amended motion.
-4-
6.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C.
Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m.
1509 LOS MONTES AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND
HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO.STORY SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (RON GROVE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
FRED STRATHDEE, F.R. STRATHDEE & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (45 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER:ERIKA LEWIT
Referencestaffreport,l2.l0.0l,withattachments. ChairVisticanotedthathewouldabstainfromvoting
because of a business relationship with the applicant. He stepped down from the dais Vice Chair Keighran
proceeded with the hearing. CP Monroe presented the staffreport, reviewed criteria and staffcomments.
Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if staff knew the height of the
existing structure. Staffreferred the question to the applicant.
Vice Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Ron Grove, applicant and owner was present to answer
questions. He noted that the proposed two-story house is just 3'-0" higher than the existing house. He has
made an effort to make changes to the plans to address Commission concems, including installing story
poles and re-routing the driveway to save the bay free on the lot. He pointed out that there are numerous
two-story houses in the neighborhood and that the floor area of the proposed house is 500 SF less than the
amount the code allows. He noted that no views will be blocked by the proposed house.
Susan Smith, 1515 Los Montes Drive, spoke concerning the proposed house. She feels that the story
poles do not show the whole picture or impact of the new house; she will lose a view from the living
room of her house, looking south; the house does not fit into the neighborhood; %)% of thehomes have
attached garages and this house has a detached garage. There were no further comments and the public
hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: story poles were a great help in evaluating the project; the proposed height is only
3'-0" higher than the existing; the Bay tree has been saved on the property; there are other homes ofthis size
in the neighborhood.
C. Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution. There was no second on the motion to approve.
Further Conrmission discussion: height of the proposed project is not greatly increased over the existing
height; the roof lines ofthe house are blended well; an attached garage would make the house look massive;
the proposed detached garage is pedestrian friendly; the design of the house is still too massive; a smaller
project would be more appropriate to the fabric of the neighborhood; not having an attached garage with
doors on the street is an asset to the neighborhood; the project has been greatly improved by the design
review process.
Vice Chair Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: l) that
the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent date stamped
November 30,2001, sheets A1, ,{4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,2}}l,sheets 42 and 43, and date
stamped October 12,2001, sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall
require and amendment to this permit;2)thatany changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or
second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
-5-
7,
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the
conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building Official's May 7,
2001 , memos shall be met; 4) that the dimensions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l' -0" x2l' -0";
5) that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing Bay tree at the
left side of the property shall remain after construction; 6) that no fence or other permanent structure shall be
erected inthe 5'-0" public sewer easement located at the rearofthe property; 7) thattheproject shall comply
with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council;
and 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Discussion on the motion: in redesign the size of the house was reduced by only a minor amount, 300 SF,
from the original application.
Chairman Vistica called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed ona3'2-l-l (Crs.
Boju6s and Keel dissenting, C. Vistica abstaining, C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised.
This item concluded at 8:20 p.m..
1147 ROLLINS ROAD - ZONED C.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONVERT AN EXISTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI-MART (GUS GRECO,
APPLICANT; H,P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVERTRUST, PROPERTY
owNER) (l NOTICED) PROJECT CATHERINE KEYLON
Reference staffreport, 12.10.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: were the trafFrc
numbers used to project trips for a mini-mart at this location averages taken from another source or counts
bases on this particular location; the numbers were based on mini-mart trip generation from a standard
sonrce; the numbers show an increase of 60/o of trips with the addition of a mini-mart, were ttrese gas stations
the same size; it is hard to tell since the increase is based on the sum of a number of site specific traffic
counts; in one submittal it notes that the County Health Department has approved this use, what does that
mean; the applicant should address this. Is it possible to have a cash only ATM? Yes. There seems to be a
problem wiitr ttre numbering of the on-site parking spaces on the plans. Access to and from this site is
awkward, given the intersection, has the applicant discussed redevelopment of the entire site to improve the
use of this site relative to the signalized intersection. This question was directed to the applicant. There
were no further questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney, 216 Park Road, representing the
property owners Gus and Gladys Greco, noted that the applicant owns two or three other similar gas stations
on the Peninsula; which they have converted to mini-marts since this application was submitted the
applicant has re-evaluated the proposed operation based on previous comments made by the Commission,
including not selling alcoholic beverages; they have found that it is hard to find qualifred mechanics to
support the service part of the gas station business, this is an ideal location for a gas station with mini-mart
because of its proximity to the freeway; they hired John Wilson to do a traffic impact study and worked on
resolving the study parameters with the Engineering Department, the tip generation was based on actual gas
sales from the site and adjusted by the increase in trips as documented by the San Diego Association of
Govemment trip generation studies for mini-marts, these indicate that there would be 13 more customers
with a mini-mart on the site, equivalent of 26 individual trips (13 in and out); feel that adding a mini-mart
will not generate a lot more customers but will cause the existing customers to spend more money when they
stop for gas; they have had an ATM that only dispenses cash onthe site for several years; concerned about
-6-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001
the condition which prohibits a microwave oven to heat up food, think issue of food establishment is covered
by not allowing tables and chairs for customers to use; the Health Department review referred to is that they
have reviewed the applicant's proposal to serve food and approved it pending city approval of the use; the
ingress and egress at the intersection has changed with the new signal, people are using Cadillac Way more,
don't feel that one more customer an hour will have a big impact on the intersection, the traffic consultant
did not feel that an access study was necessary; applicant does not think that this will become a7-ll,
because of the number of existing gas sales, 7-l I sells alcoholic beverages which attracts customers and in
the San Diego studies the size of the mini-mart did not seem to be a factor in fip generation, the key was
pass by traffic.
Commissioner noted that this mini-mart is bigger than any of the others in the city at this time. Applicant
noted that the Chevron station sells twice as much gas as the Union 76 station so would have more
customers. Commissioner asked if this particular location was factored into the trip generation numbers.
Applicant did not know. Commissioner asked if there were any hazardous wastes on the site; applicant
noted that when the tanks were replaced the site was cleaned up, they will not just redo the floor of the
service bays, they will replace it for compliance with County requirements. Commissioner; do not
understand why the size of the mini-mart does not affect the number of customers attracted, could
information about change in number of customers from your other sites after installation ofmini-marts beprovided, where are the applicant's other stations; what about shift in customers from 7-l l to this site;
applicant noted that they did not recall being asked to count customer levels at the 7-l I and none of their
other sites are accessed offa freeway, they are all along El Camino Real. Commissioner clarified that the
1695 SF area for the mini-mart included the storage area and rest rooms; yes. There were no further
comments from the floor and the public hearing wasclosed.
Commission discussion: the comparison with other mini-marts in the city does not work in this case, need to
consider the location; the nearby 7-l I is S}Yolaryerbut has 600%more customers; did site visit at 7-l 1 andduring the 20 minutes all the customers came from the north passing by the gas station; people will stop at
the gas station for lunch, using the microwave, the ATM also increasis the reasons to stop, togetherdiverted
7- I I pass by traffic, ability to microwave lunch, ATM etc. could increase the number of customers at the gas
station by 700-900 customers, have studied location and this could become a nightnare, difficult to support.
Concemed about the comparative table because the sales area in each existing mini-mart may rroihur.
included rest rooms and storage, the 7-11 has 10 on site parking spaces and this gas station is providing 12
so there will be no impact there, now there is a signal at the inters..tio, customers must use which imprwes
access over the present sifuation, customers will prefer 7-1 1 because they sell alcoholic beverages, presenceof microwave improves convenience. Concerned about traffrc and increasing the attractiJn to the gas
station, easier to stop here than 7-11 and it is more attractive, table may not be perfect comparison but
anticipate there will be more than 250 customers here after the mini-martis built based on localtion; signal
has not resolved access problem, cannot support based on the numbers given, need a more accurate study.Not opposed to the location ofthis mini-mart, but no.tconvinced by the tratrrc data that there will be this fewcustomers. One way to tell if this site will compete with 7-11 is for the applicant to tell us the number ofitems with skew numbers, if it is fewer than 7-l l then 7-l t will be the bltter choice for a customer, thiscomparative information should be provided before a decision is made. Concemed that we will create
another 7- I I , with a volume of customers at the gas station which exceeds 600 a day, the traffic at the stationlocation is diffrcult and dangerous, cannot support.
C' Bojuds moved by resolution to deny the conditional use permit and take-out permit to convert threeservice bays to a mini-mart at the existing gas station because of the negative impact on traffic at thislocation. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
-7-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
Comment on the motion: CA Anderson pointed out for the new commissioners that a denial would not
allow the applicant to resubmit this same request for a mini-mart for a year, a denial without prejudice would
allow the applicant within 90 days to revise his request, if he wished, and resubmit it for further
consideration; given the choices think applicant should be allowed to address the traffic and customer issues
raised with a new valid study, also should include a market study of new customers and diverted 7-ll
customers based on this location, the study should be done by a firm that deals in market studies forthis type
of business, the results of the study can then be translated in to traffic impacts, so would suggest a denial
without prejudice. Would also ask that the sales area of this proposed mini-mart and sales volumes be
"o-p*"d to ttre sales areas and volumes of the other mini-marts owned by this applicant. Traffic study
needs to be amplified as discussed and better sampling used. The maker and second of the motion agreed to
amend the motion to be a denial without prejudice.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice the application for a mini-
mart at ll47 Rollins Road. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised, noting that the item was subject to appeal until the date of the next City Council
meeting on January 7,2002. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m.
XI. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
8. 229 DWIGHT ROAD - ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR GARAGE LENGTH AND TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COVERED PARKING
SPACES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDINON (JOHN MAMSCALCO, APPLICANT AND
ARCHITECT; RICK ESCOBAR, PROPERTY OWNER) ( NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA
LEWIT
ZiI Lewitbriefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Maniscalco, architect, was presentto answer questions.
He noted that the addition was designed to fit the character of the existing single story house. The existing
garage must be removed because of the first floor additions; the new proposed garageabuts a greenhouse of
.i,olt* length on the property to the left. The extended garage will be used for storage of yard tools and
possibly a boat in the future.
The Commission asked about the necessity of the skylights on the north elevation and if they would be
tinted; why did the architect chose to use a shed dormer; is the change in materials from stucco on the side
elevationsto siding at the rear intentional. The applicant responded that the skylights are needed because of
the high ceiling treight in the living room and whileuntinted, they have interior automatic shades; the shed
dormer was used to create livable rpu." in the proposed loft without changing the single-story appearance of
the house; and the change in exterior material was intentional because the sfucco at the side elevation
matches the existing house and the siding at the rear elevation is in keeping with the deck an outdoor design.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Keighran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked:
. The garage should have a barge rafter extended from the roof to make it appear symmetrical;
-8-
9,
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
. Clari& plans to show whether the access door for the proposed garage is a solid hinged door or a glass
slider, both are currently shown on plans; and
o The trim on the existing windows should be carried to all windows in the addition, in particular those
on the shed dormer and the upper window on the west elevation..
Comment on motion: the design is very nice and the proposed addition has a minimal impact on the
neighbors. The special permits for the garuge are warranted because the garage will not impact the
neighbors since it is adjacent to a similar building at their side property line and the design complements the
main dwelling.
This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s.
Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6'0-l (C. Osterling absent). The planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:3b p.m.
840 NEWHALL ROAD _ ZOIYED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FRONT SETBACK
VARIANCE, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DETACHED GARAGE WIDTH FOR A NEW TWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JERRY DEAL, JD AND ASSOCIA TES,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNE& ROBERT AND GERMAIN ALFARO , PROPERTY OWNERS) (48
NOTI PROJECT PI SEAN O'ROI
ZT Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Jerry Deal, designer, was present to answer questions. He
noted that 600 SF dimensions ofthe garage are the result of the o*.r"r **iing to park two .*. i1th. garage
as well as being able to use it for storage. He explained that there is a request for a front setback variance for
the new house because the property niurows from the rear to the front and because the required setback
creates a lot of space in the front yard that is not private while at the same time reducing the size of the
backyard. He noted that two other newer houses on that block had setbacks similar to the sitback proposed
with this project.
The Commission commented that there did not appear to be any special circumstances on the lot to justiff a
variance; the character in the neighborhood is predominantly very large front setbacks; the design of the
house is very nice; if the applicant complies with the required front setback, the private space in the backyard
can then be increased by eliminating the extra storage space attached to the garage.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked:
o Eliminate the variance for front setback because there is no hardship on the lot.
This motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
-9-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001
Comment on motion: all of the Commissioners seated conctured with the recommendation listed above.
Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to place this item on regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at9:44 p.m.
1520 LOS MONTES DRIYE - ZONED R-1 _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FLOOR AREA
RATIO VARIANCE, AND HILLSIDEAREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FORA FIRSTAND SECOND
STORY ADDITION (CHRIS RUFFAT, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANTAND ARCHITECT; ED
10.
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. The Commission asked staff if there was a
measurement included in the code to differentiate between remodels and new homes based on the demolition
proposed for a project. Staff replied that the only distinction is based on the amount of floor area added.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, and EdNeale, owner, were present
to answer questions. The architect noted that the FAR variance is the result of the way the code calculates
floor area under the new deck; the space undemeath the deck is counted as living area though it could never
be used as such without undertaking major work on the space. The owner noted that the request for an FAR
variance is so that he can have a deck at the rear of the dwelling at the same floor where the main living area
is in order to fully enjoy the property.
The Commission noted that the plans needed to clariffthe type ofwindows and trim proposed; the house has
many Craftsman details on the front elevation, but these details have not been carried through to the other
elevations; is there another way to address the front entrance so that there isn't just a single pillar supporting
the front porch; there is so much demolition occurring with this project it is almost a replacement so it is
logical to think that an FAR variance could be eliminated.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following direction given:
o Repeat the Craftsman details shown on the front elevation on the right, left, and rear elevations;
o Detail what type of windows and trim are proposed; and
o The FAR variance should be eliminated because there is no hardship on the propefi to justiff it; ifthe
deck is retained, floor area should be eliminated from somewhere else in the house so that the proposal
meets code requirements.
This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s.
Comment on motion: all of the Commissioners seated concurred with the recommendations listed above.
Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The
motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at l0:03 p.m.
-10-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001
11. 1415 BENITO AVENUE _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FORDESIGN REVMW FORA FIRSTAND
SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW DETACTMD GARAGE (JOHNNY DAROSA, DAROSA AhID
ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; PETER AND SHIRLEY CHIANG, PROPERTY
owNERS) r60 NOTICED) PRO.IECT PLANNER: SEAN O,R
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Johnny DaRosa, applicant and designer, was present to
answer questions.
Randy VandenBrink, l4l2 Alvarudo Avenue, spoke to request that the plans show if the existing trees at the
rear of the property will remain after construction and noted that there is an existing basement i" tt ir house
which was not shown on the plans.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following direction given:
o House design does not fit with the neighborhood; proposed house is too bold and busy, needs to be
softened;
o Applicant should provide a detailed landscape plan to show existing and proposed landscaping
including trees to be retained on site it is important that the scale of the tu"arrupi"g match the scale of
the house and that new plantings be designed to soften and screen the addition iom neighbors and
from the street;
o Window trim needs clarification, the proposed trim is heavy and appears to overpower the windows;
t Applicant should provide a two-car garage and at the same time, can improve the massive appearance
of the garage by showing two garage doors instead of one door;
o The triangular-shaped transoms above the windows are not consistent with the style of the house;
o The pop-up window in the garage should be eliminated;
o The windows on the right and left elevation are very Iarge and will have a big impact on the neighbors;
can they be scaled-down or screened with landscaping; and
o Current proposal is like a layer-cake; would like to see some variation in the eave lines and
articulation to break up the massive appearance of the house;
This motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant The motionpassed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Plaruring Commission's action is advisory and notappealable. This item concluded at l0:18 p.m.
-l l-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001
XU. PLANNERREPORTS
Review of Joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting ofNovember28,200l and City Council
regular meeting of December 3, 2001.
- CP Monroe reviewed the Council actions at their meeting on December 3,2001.
. The November 28,2001Joint City council/Planning Commission meeting were not noticed on the
calendar for approval so will be placed on the January 14,2002 agenda for approval.
Issues for February Joint Session
Commissiondiscussed items whichmightbe considered atthe Joint CityCouncil/PlanningCommission
meeting in February. It was noted that there were four items which were to be carried over from the
November Joint meeting; also that it might be appropriate to review progress on the SAP for the north
end of the city. Staffnoted that because of a delay the DEIR for the Safeway project at 1450 Howard
Avenue would not be available until the third week of January 2002, so the Planning Commission's
special meeting to take public comment on the DEIR study should be delayed from January 30 to a later
date in February to provide the public time to review the DEIR document. February 20 was discussed as
an option for a new date.
Open Study Meeting on Housing Element
Ci Monroe reminded the Commission that a special open study meeting on the Draft Housing Element
would be held on December 19, 2OOl,in the Council Chambers. The focus ofthe discussion would be
the Goals, policies and Action Program. Changes would be incorporated and the document prepared to
be forwarded to City Council in January,2002, Following Council review ofthe draft it would be sentto
the State for their comment.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Vistica adjourned the meeting atl0:47 p.m.
Respectfu lly submitted,
Joe Boju6s, SecretarY
I.]NAPPROVEDMINUTES I ZI O
-12-
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
Wednesday, December 19, 2001
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 19, 2001, special meeting of the
Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Keele, Keighran (arrived at 7:10 p.m.)
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Bojuds, Brownrigg
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; Citv .Affome y, Larry Anderson
frr. APPROVAL oF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
IV. STUDY SESSION
1. Review of the Draft Housing Element Update
CP Monroe presented an overview of the draft housing element and explained the process. CA Anderson
gave an overview of the State requirements for updating housing elements. Commissioners noted that there
are sites identified in the element for housing opportunities, would the same opportunities be available to
other properties within the proposed residential overlay zones. Staff noted that the identified sites are
examples of properties which have the most potential for development, but other properties in the area
proposed for the overlay zones could also take advantage of the same opportunities.
Chairman Vistica opened the meeting to public comment. Philip Kahn, 1451 Capuchino Avenue, Ed Hayes
representing Peninsula Habitd{sr Huma:i5,, Cathy Baylock, 1527 Newlands Avenue, Dan Anderson, 728
Vemon Way, Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington Way, Lee Tanton, 845 Linden Avenue, Skip Brand , !22glaguna
Avenue, Chuck Mink, 1541 Los Montes, Diane Condon-Wirgler, 1536 Cypress Avenue, and Connie Mills,
945 Laguna Avenue commented on the Draft Housing Element. Comments included: should look at the
ratio between commercial and residential and effects on revenue; interested in affordable housing, non-
profits need incentives that help with land costs, reduced parking in transit-oriented development makes the
cost of land per unit go down, it might not mean more units but they would be more affordable, should look
at density limits for different areas; make sure there is an appropriate transition between high density and
existing neighborhoods to provide a buffer; should look at the live/work units, they can provide for transition
in commercial and industrial areas; should review parking requirements second 1mitr; should provide
oppotunities for affordable senior housing near the hospital; think that the time has come for the community
to accept mixed use development; concern with apartments being torn down and replaced with high priced
condominiums; should not use reduced parking requirement as incentive in area near Broadway, already
parking problems, might encourage residents to use public lots at night, could have uncovered parking rather
than in a structure.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December l,9,2001
Commissioners continued discussion, noting that the following items should be added to the housing
element work program:
tr Make sure there is provision in the element for public agency partnerships for groups like teachers,
hospital workers;
U Add policy to encourage live work units in the area south of Burlingame Avenue
O Look at zoning code changes to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed use projects;
tr Extend design review to multiple family projects as a housing maintenance program;
tr Look at changing the eligibility date to qualiff for the second unit amnesty program to include units built
after 1954;
tr Make it clear in Housing Element that there is very little space in Burlingame for new housing
development and document the time, effort and money spent developing this document;
O Encourage use of private foundation grants to help fund affordable units;
The consensus of the Commission was to forward the Draft Housing Element to the City Council withthe
revisions noted above. CP Monroe noted that those in attendance would be notified when the report was to
be reviewed by the City Council. Chairman Vistica thanked those who came for their interest and
attendance.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Vistica adjoumed the meeting at9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ralph Osterling, Acting Secretary
2
I.]NAPPROVEDMINI-MES I 2. I 9
BT]RLINGAME BEAUTIX'ICATION COMMISSION
DECEMBER 6.2001
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5.32 p.m. by
Chairperson Locke.
ROLL CALL
Present Chairperson Locke, Commissioners Camey, Ellis, Lauder, and McGowanStaff: Superintendent Richmond and Administrative Secretary Harvey
Absent: Commissioners Efesselgren and Webb
Guests: Maria Cav4 Mary Blythe, Gary Blythe, Eric Adler, and Jeanie Adler
Chairperson Locke welcomed the new Commissioner Jeanne Camey. Commissioner Camey stated that
she has been a resident of Burlingame for 6 years, but has lived in the Bay fuea for manyyears; she is a
rytiqed registered nurse, is a member the Women's Club, San Mateo County Fair, and thb Carden Study
Club of the Peninsula. Commissioner Camey added that she loves gardening, nature, the environment,
and is pleased to be serving on the Commission.
MINUTES - Minutes were approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
I etter to LeeRoy Kloezemarl 2748 Summit Drive, informing him that the Commission upheld his appeal
for the removal of a protected Eucalyptus tree on his property.
Letter t9 John Gong, I I Kenmar Way, informing him that the Commission denied his appeal for the
removal of a protected Palm tree on his property.
Copy of letter to Craig Rossi from Mayor Galligan thanking him for his service on the Burlingame
B eautifi cation Commission.
Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Craig Rossi thanking him for his service on the Beautification
Commission.
Copy of letter from Mayor Galligan to Jeanne Camey advising her of her recent appointnent to the
Burlingame Beautifi cation Commission.
Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Jeanne Camey congratulating her on her appointment to the
Burlingame Beautification Commission and information regarding the Commission's bversight.
Letter from Gary & Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, appealing the denial of a permit to remove a
protected Dawn Redwood tree on their property.
Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Gary & Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, ffirming them
that their appeal would be heard at the December 66 Beautification Commission meeting.
Letter fromEric & Jean Adler, 2111 Easton Drive, appealing the denial of apermit to remove aprotected
Yew tree on their properly.
Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Eric & Jean Adler, 21 1 1 Easton Drive, informing them that their
appeal would be heard at the December 6m Beautification Commission meeting.
Memo to the Commission from Superintendent Richmond informing ofnew procedures for appeals of tree
removal denials.
I
F'ROM THE FLOOR
There were no comments from the floor.
OLD BUSINESS
ffi.perso, Loct e reviewed the following items with the Commission to be held over to future meetings.
Sprins Garden Seminar - Saturdav. March 23, 2902 - Chairperson Locke reported that Tamara Lewis
^eetingand
reviewher topic with the Commission.
Tree plantine on Old Bavshore Boulevard.- Status Reoort - Commissioner McGowan asked that this
item be reviewed at ate the applicants appealing the denials of
protected tree removals.
- [r Commissioner 's absence, Chairperson Locke
asked if these items be carried forward until further information maY be obtained. Commissioner
McGowan moved that these ilenx be tabled and moved to a future agenda when dala can be mail.e
available to the Commission;seconded Motion canied 5 - 0 - 2 (absent).
Commissioner
Lauder that this item be tabled and movedto afuture
NEW BUSINESS
Superintendent Richmond
December or January Commission
before the Commission.
the Commission that Porter would not be at the
meetings but could submit a staffreport on either of the appeals currently
SuperintendentRichmond statedthat applicant's appealforthe removal ofthetree at 1360 Vancouver Avenue
is based on section ti.ti6.-G0taJiizfr"a (Q (z)'of the Urban Reforestation ordinance; to allow for the
economic enjoyment of the proiJrty'*a *ri economic consequences and obligatl^ons of requiring a tree to
remain. He added th"iffi "ip6anicited
concerns about damage to the driveway from the tree's roots. The
Cit;*ri a.i.r-i"J tt it tr,. tree is healthy and that any future root problems.could be mitigated by root
t *-g;J the placement of root barriers without compromising the structural integrity of the tree.
Commissioner Ellis stated that the tree appears to be healthy; that the driveway is very old and appears to be
original to the house.
Commissioner Camey commented that it is a pretty tree and is not very close to the neighbors house; that the
damage to the driveway appea^rs to have been there for quite some time.
Chairperson Locke noted that the tree is in the middle and very close to both driveways but speculates that
the volunteer Privet tree may be causing the driveway damage'
SuperintendentRichmond replied that hairline cracks in concrete driveways can occur n{urally qnd canbe
found in other ari"r*uvr * iell. He added that the Dawn Redwood is a deciduous conifer and is not very
common in Burlingaml. He noted that there is a large one in the City's Washington Park.
Commissioner McGowan remarked that he was raised in the neighborhood of where this tree exists; the tree
fr* U"." there for uppro*i-ut ely 25years. He added that DawriRedwoods are very long lived and since it
i, pr*i.a i, u ,.rt irt'"J*"", iti,* probably reached i!1 maJurg size. He commented that it seemed unusual
tdtffi iequest for removal wouldiome uit.r the resident had lived with the ffee for over 25 years.
Chairperson Locke asked if the anyone wanted to address the Commission regarding this appeal.
)
(Contd,) - The applican! Gary Blythe, stated that he has lived at 1360 Vancouver snce 1977. His family
has enjoyed the tree but his neighbor, Maria Cava (13 56 Vancouver), has asked him to trim the tree in the
past because of debris in the roof gutters. He added drat the lawnmower hits one of the tree's roots in his
lawn that is 15' away from the trunk. The tree is only 2-3' away from his neighbor' driveway and many of
the branches from the tree are on his neighbors side. He concluded that he believes the roots have damaged
his driveway.
Maria Cav4 13 56 Vancouver Avenue, commented thatthe property belongs to her mother. She commented
that her mother is constantly cleaning up the debris from *ris nee. She added that the little needles fall in the
roofgutters, clogging the drain pipe and recently requiring repair ofthe gutters and the placement ofscreens.
She concluded that the screens have not stopped the little tiny debris from falling into the gutters.
Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, commented that, if approved, they would be willing to plant a tree
in the same location; drat they love trees, but this one causes somuch damage and hassle. Ga[, Blythe added
that Dawn Redwoods seem to need more room.
Commissioner McGowan asked the applicant if the tree had ever been pruned back from the neighbor's
property by a professional tree company? Mr. Blythe responded "No", thit he had trimmed back only a few
branches because they do enjoy fie shade from the tree.-
Aoreal of the Denial to Remove a Protected D Redwood Tree @ 1360 Vancouver Avenue -
Commissioner Ellis commented that deciduous trees loose leaves
continual clean up, all year long that is the problem.
Mrs. Cava responded that it is the
rin!-a Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, asked if this fiee could be "limbed up" to help mitigate the debrisprobleq so that not so much is falling? Superintendent Richmond respondei drat ifthe tree -were raised too
much tre tree might look odd.
Chairperson Locke closed the public comments.
Commissioner McGowan stated that the tree is beautifi and he does not believe it will get much larger. He
added that this tree can be seen going down Hillside Drive and going up Easton Drive] He concluded thatpruning away from the neighbor's roofline by a professional tree iom[any would help or eliminate t]re debris
problem.
Commissioner Ellis agreed that the tree is beautifirl and could be pruned to mitigate the neighbor's debris
lssue-
Chairperson Locke noted that most trees represent some kind ofa nuisance factor. She added, that the tree
is. in a narrow space, and that some kind ofroot damage is apparent. She speculated that tttJt ee *itt get
biggerand indicated that she was surprised to hear thar th" uppiic-t -o,lld replant a tree in a small area that
p l-Ea by two. driveways. Chairperson Locke then'asked the Comrnission if they needed more
information from the City's Arborist who was unable to attend this meeting.
Connls-siory1 L.IcGowan rcsponded thol he woutd like more informationfrom the City,s Arbort$ andtnoveil thal this item be catieil over to ,he.Febtaaqt 2002 Cominission miatng wt en ilre iity Arbofistcoulil speak to this item arul that,^the applicant proiitc the Commissionwitl ai inacjiaini Arborirf ,leport supporting their rcquest for removal; siconded Motion carried s - 0 - 2 @6sent).
Chairperson Locke advised the applicarts that there would be no action on their item but would be continued
at the February 76 commission meeting when the city A$orist could be available.
J
Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Yew Tree @. 2111 EastqB Drive - Superintendgnt
to remove the Yew tree based on Section
11.06.060 (a)1S1: . . . the rr.rrriUbr of trees thl particular parcel canlupport Hg.{{ed that the applicants
ur" ..q,r.rtirrg removal of the Yew tree because ttrey feel it overshadows and hinders the grovlh of the
Camperdown Elm.
Superintendent Richmond stated that the adjacent properly _ovfilers have been notified of the removal
;.qugJ;a the department has received no comments.
-The
City Arborist noted that the Elm in the front
;iililr"p.rry mrgtrt be considered for removal by the qroperfy owner because it has a forked trunk with
includid Uart. Ho*ever, he adde{ the City arborist determined the Yew tree to be a healthy, mature
rp..i-"n; that removal of the Yew tree *oUa nol necessarily ilPlove thestature.of the Camperdown
n't1n; and ihat a larger Elm tree in the area actually overshadows the Camperdown Elm to an even greater
extent.
Commissioner Lauder commented that the Yew tree is magnificent and removal would cause a large void
if it were removed.
Commissioner Camey stated that the Yew is taking up space and not allowing light for the Camperdown
Elr"; tiltlr" apphc#'s pri*rry concem is to savJtheptm. She addedthatthe CamperdownElm is more
significant than the Yew tree.
CommissionerMcGowan statedthatmostofthetrees onthe properlywere all planted aboutthe sametime
and that yew trees *uully do not grow to that size. nemoving the Yew_tre" "Tght
allow for more air
-o""-*t*"orgh th;6;"nmUriif small limbs were removedfromtheYew, the CamperdownElm's
growth might be improved.
Commissioner Ellis noted that there is damage to a private walkway that appears to be damaged by the
large Elm in the area-
Chairperson Locke asked if anyone from the audience wished to address the Commission regarding this
appeal.
Eric Adler, 21 1l Easton Drive, stated that the older trees on his properly arc overgrowing ang .lo*di"q
the other trees on hi;;."p"rtla' The Camperdown eln is starting t6 lean;.light comes from the East and
"l"i"ifigf,t is being 6sf H; added that they have-cared fo1 an{ s91e to the gx.pense of having the large
gfrn i" fr6nt cabled"and are not asking to remove this tree, but the Yew tree is just too big.
Jeanie Adler, 2l I I Easton Drive, commented ttrat the Camperdown Elm had an umbrella shapetyt is n9w
starting to lean o".r -JGufr oot lut . She added th4 a_qrofe.ssional tree cgmpanl has advised them that
there are too many trees in that one area and since the iew is closest to the walkway believes that it is
causing the damage to the walkwaY'
Mrs. Adler then submitted copy of a letter from Peninsula Tree Care representative, William Kleinheinz.
Commissioner McGowan asked if theYew tree had ever been professional trimmed? Mrs. Adler stated
that it had been trimmed several yearc ago.
Chairperson Locke closed the public comments.
4
AooealoftheDenialtoRemoveaProtectedYewTrce@.2111EastonDrive-(Contd.)Commissioner
Ellis stated that she would like to hear comments from the City Arborist before rendering a decision.
Commissianer Lauder agreed and. moved thot this item be carried over to the February 2002
Commissian meeting when the City Arborist could. speak to this iteml seconded Mofion conied 5 -
0 - 2 (absefi).
Chairperson Locke advised the apptcants that there would be no action on ttreir item tonight but would be
continued at the February f Commission meeting when the City Arborist could be available.
Tree Plantins on Old Bavshore Boulevard - Status Reoort - Commissioner McGowan stated that
Superintendent Richmond, CommissionerHesselgreq and he met with City Planner Monroe and Planning
Commissioner Bojues to discuss tree planting on Old Bayshore Boulevard, North of Broadway. Ci6,
Planner Monroe indicated to the group that the Pluuring Commission had made some changes in its
direction and felt the Beautification Commission should hire a consultant to assist them with some design
lines.
CommissionerMcGowan statedthathe andCommissionerHesselgren believethe City Council andttre Crty
Manager would like to see some beautification of the area; the idea was brought up by a Councilperson at
the Joint Beautification Commission/Council meeting. Commissioner McGowan stated that with his
experience in landscape design, that on his own time, he would be willing to create a schematic for tree
planting in that area. If approved by the Commission, it could then be proposed to the City Council.
The Commission discussed possible future changes in the area and speculation of a potential master plan
for the area that might affect newly planted trees. Superintendent Richmond stated that there are many
variables that exist in the arga and the Beautification Commission will need to be moving in the same
general direction set by the Planning Commission.
Commissioner McGowan stated that there are about 64 existing planting sites in the area, that changes are
not likely to happen any time soon, and since the City Manager and Council have expressed some interesq
it would be worth pursuing.
Chairperson Locke added that by providing a schematic of tree planting of the area it could generate more
interest, but it would be important that the plan not be at cross purposJs with the Planning Commission's
vision of the area- Superintendent Richmond stated that he would also ask the Director of public Works
what he believes the future plans are for the area-
Superintendent Richmond suggested that any general concept ideas Commissioners may have for the area
be presented to Commissioner McGowan.
REPORTS - Richmond -l) Recommel{ed that the Commission consider canceling the January 3'd Commission meeting.
2) Requested that the appeal process for private tree removals and how it applies to the Urban-
Reforestation ordinance be placed on the next agenda.
3) The Fall tree planting has been completed and the deadline for tree selection for the March 2OOZ \zrilll
be at the end of December.
a) The tree crew are currently rimming Sycamores in the eastside section of Burlingame Avenue from
Palm Avenue. The tree crew is also keeping to their goal of trimming every tree in the City at least
every 4 years.
5) Theretras been some negative reacfion to the raising ofthe City trees over the streets as required by the
vehicle code as referenced in the city Attomey's memo dated l2l30l9g.
5
REPORTS - Richmond - (Contd.)
6) Eight small to medium sized trees were lost in the recent storm.
7) The City's tree lighting ceremony will be on Decemb er T at4:30 p.m.; school choirs will be
performing.
8) Superintendent Richmond welcomed Commissioner Camey and appreciated her willingness and
interest to address 2 appeals at her first meeting.
SuperintendentRichmond concludedthathe enjoys drilring along CaliforniaDrive and seeing howwell the
trees look being planted along that corridor; that it was a good project recommended by Commissioner
McGowan.
Lauder - Commissioner Lauder welcomed and thanked Commissioner Camey forjoining the Commission.
Carnev- Commissioner Camey commented that she found the first meeting to be very interesting, that she
will be learning a lot, and will have lots of questions.
There being no further business, Chairperson Locke adjoumed the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Resp ectfi.rlly submitted,
Karlene Harvey
Recording Secretary
6
The City of Burlingame
CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
cALtFORN|A 94010-3997
TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, December 13, 2001
Commissioners Present: Lisa De Angelis, Chair
Jim Mclver, Vice Chair
Russ Cohen
David Mayer
Commissioners Absent: Jim Evans
StaffPresent:
Staff Absent:
Visitors:
Frank Erbacher, Assistant Director of Public Works
Homayoun Barekat, Traffic Engineer, Public Works
Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works
Keith Tamura, Traffrc Officer, Police Department
Keith Marshall, Fire Marshal, Fire Department
Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Department
Jennifer Pfafq 615 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame
Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, Burlingame
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday , December'13,2001
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair De Angelis.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners were present.
4. CURRENT BUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4.1.1 Election of New chair and New vice chair for year 2ffi2
It was moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/DeAngelis) to elect Vice Chair Mclver to Chair andComm. Evans to Vice Chair for 2002. Unanimously approved by the Commission.
4.1.2 Minutes for November 8, 2001, were submitted and approved.
4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.2.1 Request for Red Zone at 1225 Oak Grove Avenue (No area noticing)
Mr. Barekat advised that he did further studies at this location but could not identiff a significantproblem. Extending the red zone would restrict parking availability further. Mr. Erbacher
advised that this driveway is not much different than other driveways in the area. Comm. Cohenvisited the site and sees this site has an advantage since it is next io another driveway. Comm.Mayer visited the site and recommends a red zone for two full car spaces. Chair DeAnielis askedif height of parked vehicles is the problem. Mr. Erbacher advised that, no, those &iting thisdriveway actually have the advantage of one driveway plus two parking spaces, another drivewayand a red zone which provides a good window to see oncoming iraffic. It was moved andseconded (Comms. Cohen/Mclver) to move this to an Action Item immediately; it was thenmoved and seconded (Comms. Cohen/Mclver) to deny this request as recommended by staff.Motion was approved by the Commission with the foilowiog ,otr, 3 Ayes, 1 Nay (Mayer), 1
Absent.
4.2.2 Request for Red Zone on north side of Poppy Drive, east of Adeline Drive
There was an original request was for a blue handicapped zone at252Opoppy Drive; however,
since their neighbor on Adeline Drive also requested a blue zone, staff suggisted one red zonefor their mutual use since they won't ue parting their cars, just unloading passengers. Mr.Erbacher advised that a white zone could be placed for passenger loading orrry. Co-.. Cohensuggested trying a white zone as a first step to respond to their needs then placing the blue zone.officer Tamura advised that if the zone is red and the police receive a report thaia car is parkedthere, they are obliged to issue a ciktion. Staff recommended one whiie zone placed berween
The City of Buflingame
Page 2
5
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, December 13 ,2001
residences. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Cohen) to move this to an Action Item
immediately; it was then moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Mclver) to accept staffs
recommendation for one white zone for both parties to have access to passenger unloading.
Unanimously approved by the Commission.
4.2.3 Residential Traffic Calming Program Study - Proposed Study Outline
Mr- Barekat advised that he has incorporated all comments from the last meeting and included
legal issues and property value issues. He also provided a video of trafhc calming devices. He
asked for comments and stated he will have more forms, e.g., the ballot
"rO ttr" petition,
available at the next meeting. The Fire Marshal advised he will interface with Redwood City for
their input. The main concern is the wear and tear on their g400,000 fire apparatus going over
humps or slowing down to avoid vehicle damage. Mr. Erbacher advised that we will ieview the
outline in January and proceed to Council in February so that, if approved, money can then be
set aside in the budget for traffic calming requests.
Comments included using bullets to avoid inadvertent prioritizing of measures; using italics and
asterisks for emphasis. The petition and guidelines for speed humps will be aOOiO for next
month's meeting. AIso, a flow chart will be added showing the steps to be followed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS
5'l Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to determine
whether traffic-calming measures are warranted
Selective Enforcemenl status prepared by Sgt. Cutler showed results from November. Nineteen traffic
stops were made on Howard and 9 on Bayswater during peak traffrc hours.
5.2 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail)
5.3 3138 Rivera - Speed and Signage (e-mail)
5.4 1300 Block of vancouver Avenue - speed concems (petition)
5-5 2415 Adeline Drive - Letter regarding Traffrc Concerns related to Sisters of Mercy Locale
From the floor, the petitioner explained the traffic safety concerns for her area with the Sisters of Mercy
having more events causing more traffic and diverting "main gate" traffic to the service road. Weekendtraffic is heavy, too, due to retreats, weddings and other events at the site. Also, the new parking lot atMercy has not reduced on-street parking. Delivery trucks have hit cars parked in the *"* th"1,"u.,nytraffic impedes normal residential traffic on Adeline.
The City of Budingame
Page 3
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, December 13 ,2001
Mr. Erbacher advised the required parking is set by Planning and is addressed in the City's response to
her letter. There used to be a centerline on Adeline Drive but has wom off and can be replaced. The
volume of traffic cannot be changed by the City. The main gate is controlled by Mercy. The City can
do a radar study. Speed will be studied along with volume. The data will be gathered in January and will
be available in February. A work order will be issued to replace the centerline with dots added.
6. FROM THEFLOOR
6.1 A resident asked about a signal for the crosswalk on California Drive at Stack's Restaurant. She
spoke to the Traffic Engineer two years ago about it and was told there was no money available and
perhaps the following year a signal would be budgeted. tvft. Erbacher advised this is on a "wish list,,
at this time. The signals for California Drive at Carmelita Avenue and Morrell Avenue will be
going in soon.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
7.1 From Staff to Commission
7 .1.2 Traffic Engineer's Report
Mr. Barekat advised that the project installing traffic signals for Carmelita and Morrell will be
going out to bid soon.
7.1.3 StaffAction Log
Submitted with updates.
7.2 From Commission to Staff
7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests
Comm. Cohen received a citizenrequest as to why the new parking meters in downtown lots take
only quarters. Mr. Barekat explained that for box capacity and collection purposes, quarters are
best.
7.2.2 Comments and communication
Comm. Cohen advised that pursuant to the City Engineer's study for a new downtown parking lot
which includes making distant lots free, he has put together a preliminary report or, ,igrug"lhut
could work in downtown Burlingame which includes examples from across the United States. He
stated that good signage and public education is the cornerstone of a successful campaign to
encourage employees to park in the free lots.
The City of Burlingame Page 4
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, December 13, 2OO1
7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, January 10,2002 meeting - None.
8. INACTIVE ITEMS.
8.1 Request for traffic control on Dwight Road
Mr. Erbacher advised he is in the process of looking at the plans.
8.2 Millbrae BART Station - Potential Impacts on City streets
8.3 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at
Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOP sign on Trousdale
at Quesada Way. Results of TrafficDataGathering - Speed limits
Officer Tamura stated that the speed appears to be coming down. He provided Sgt. Cutler's Selective
Enforcemer, results for November which showed I 6 citations issued, slightly down from I 9 last month.
Also, 13 verbal warnings were issued.
9. AGENDIZE FOR TTIE NEXT MEETING
2415 Adeline Drive request to Acknowledgments -Datagathering in January
10. ADJOURNMENT. 9:30 p.m.
The City of Burlingame Page 5
-]
BUflLINGAME
?UBLIC
LIEfiARY
Burlingame Public Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes
November 13, 2OOl
Call to Order
The meeting of November 13, 2OOl was called to order by
President, Mar5r Herman, at 4:30 pm.
Roll Call
Trustees Present:Cecile Coar, Jane Dunbar, Andrew
Gurthet, and Mary Herman
Catherine McCormack
Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
I
Trustees Absent
Staff Present:
IV
V
III
Hrimrose Roodogurlingome.CA
(6 50 | 342 - I 03 8. Fox (6 5 0l 3 42- 19 48. www. p ls.lib
Warrants and Special Funds
Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants as
presented. M/S/C (Gurthet/Coar)
Minutes
The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the minutes of the
October 16, 2OO1 meeting. M/S/C (Coar/Gurthet)
Correspondence
Correspondence mailed in the packets was reviewed.A. Library of vietnam Leaflet - The Trustees felt that they
needed to obtain more detailed information about the entity known
as "Glob'al community Service Projects". The Trustees were
interested in finding out whether there is any precedent of libraries
having a sister library prograrn. The city Librarian noted that ALA
has a sister library program and offered to include information onthis subject in the December board packet. The Trustees agreed to
request that Mr. constantino attend the January ls,2oo2 meeting
instead of the December 11th meeting.
480
Phone
94010 40 83
c.o . u s / p I s / p I s . h t m I
II.
VII.
B. PROutline: Years 1999, 2OOl and2OO2-LindaSanto
used this outline for her presentation to the City Council detailing
adult programming made available to the public including exhibits
and winning awards.
VI. From the Floor Members of the public did not attend.
Reports
A. City Librarian's Report - A1 Escoffier, The City Librarian
reviewed his report highlighting the following issues.1. Easton Branch Renovation Project - At the City
Council meeting held on October 166, the Council agreed to
support Option #2 as it best serves the needs of the public
and meets the financial constraints of the project. This
option includes completely renovating the interior with the
foilowing upgrades: HVAC, mechanical, electrical, seismic
and handicapped accessibility. The Marshall Trust will be
the main source of funding. The tentative timetable is to
hold public workshops and complete design work in 2OO2
with construction beginning in 2003. On December 13th a
meeting will be held to begin the planning process for the
next phase of the project.
2. Easton Branch Staffing
a. Lisa Dunseth resigned as the Branch Librarian
effective on November 2.d. Lisa has accepted a
position at San Francisco Public Library.
b. Staffing for the Branch will be reorganized. An
in-house recruitment for a Librarian III position will
begin soon with a cut off date of November 9th. The
person who is appointed to this position will oversee
special projects of which the Branch will be one.c. Amy Gettle, Circulation Supervisor, is overseeing
the transition period at the Branch.
3. California Library Assoclation Awards - The Library
received two awards from the California Library Association:
one for the Foundation Newsletter and one for Adult
Programming. Linda Santo, Maryam Refahi, Jan Eustis and
Sue Reiterman comprise the PR Committee.B. Foundation Report - Dunbar/Herman1. Nominatlng Committee - The nominating committee
is accepting nominations for new board members who will be
presented at the January meeting, as well as the oflicers for
the coming year.
Library Board of Trustee Minutes
November 13. 2001 2
VIII. Unfinished Business
A. Employee Achievement Awards - Mary Herman, Cecile
Coar and Andrew Gurthet will present the Employee Achievement
Awards for the year 2001.
B. Employee Recognition Dinner - Invitations were sent out
the first of November and responses are requested by December
3td.
C. Holiday Tree Lighting - A holiday program will be held at
City Hall on December 7th after which the traditional tree lighting
will take place. The Library will host its Holiday program at
5:30pm.
IX. New Business -
A. The Trustees approved a motion to fund Lisa Dunseth's
going away party in the amount of $200.00. M/SlC
(Coar/ Gurthet)
X. Announcements -A. Patron Davld Jonson - Trustee Herman advised the
trustees that she had received an e-mail from Mr. David Jonson
inquiring as to whether the Library Trustees had made any further
changes to the Holiday Schedule for the year 2002. Trustee
Herman replied to Mr. Jonson by e-mail that no further changes
were made.
B. Employee Achievement Award Dinner - The trustees
agreed to invite past trustees Jeff Berger and Mary Lou Morton to
this event.
C. New Council Member - The City Librarian advised the
Trustees that he would be inviting newly elected Council member
Cathy Baylock to the Library for an orientation session.
XI Adiournment - The meeting was adjoumed at 5:15pm. M/S/C
(Gurthet/Herman) The next meeting of the Library Board of
Trustees is scheduled for December i 1, 2001 at 4:30pm in the
Library Conference Room.
Respectfully Submitted
Alfre H. Esc
Citv Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes
November 13, 2001
J
CITA OF BARI.INGAME
IEIE UOIITE
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTMTY NOVEMBER, 2001
SN{A MONTE TETS YEAR
BUII.DING INSPECTION
I.I,8T YEIR
I.}ST UONTE YEAR DATE
FISCAIJ YEIR
DATEDATE
Va1uatloD
$6, s50, 917
$2,352.389
$2,010,000
$10,282,6s1
$9 1752 t 445
$1s5, ooo
s98,723
$164. 975
$13,100
$2,380,584
$1S8, 59s
$248,198
9653,288
PGmiE rlrp.
New Slngle Family
New t'tult i - Fam1ly
Neh' Commerclal
Alterat,Lons -Rea
Alt,eratsionE-NonReE
Demolltlon
swimming PooI
sign Permit.s
Fence6
Rerooflng
Repalrs
Window RepI
MiacelIaneou8
vrlualiotr
$3s0,000
$o
s5, s00, 000
$788,200
$s57, s00
99,000
122 , Ooo
$6,800
$333, s85
$7,600
i4L ,629
$55,100
vcluaEioB
$878.552
$o
$o
$483,638
i4 , 9L6 ,41.s
$o
$o
$5,100
$o
$137, s18
$3s, 000
s2X,93s
99,700
Valuatl,ou
$4,772,Lso
s2{7, 000
$12,98s,000
$11,7{1,1s1
$9,328.200
$ls0, s00
$15{,138
$93,378
$5,700
$2, 513 , 08e
$31S,000
s4s4,498
$1.383, s73
VrlurtioD
$2, 610, 000
$o
s10,100,000
$4, 8s6, 409
$4 , s19, {so
$39,000
i22,000
$37 ,325
95,700
9L t 424 ,525
$1s, eoo
1222 ,2Os
$sr2 t 429
*
3
0
22
4
I
0
J.
0
5
5
valuaEloB
$970,000
$o
$o
$s99,180
$1,01s,000
$o
So
12,7sO
$s,700
9119,732
$o
$39,800
$18,300
*
15
1
7
254
58
51
11
22
2
224
29
53
*
23
2
263
93
50
I
39
3
231
30
43
52
*
t
0
1
15
5
8
3
0
28
4
5
6
*
0
0
22
10
5
0
0
15
4
*
I
0
4
L22
27
26
1
72r
7
34
TOTA],S..--..62 12,'.770,462 79 $8,692,4L5 67 $5,488,858 824 944,r57,377 840 934,871,956 388 924,365,943
t2/o"/01, 1a z 26 :49
I
lnvestments
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2001
Par
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
%ot
Portiollo
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
Term 360 Equlv.
YTM
365 Equlv.
LAIF & County Pool
CORP NOTES
Fed€ral Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
14,028,399,95
3,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
14,028,399.95
3,112,500.00
16,363,720.00
14,028,399.95
3,027,780.00
16,000,000.00
42.44
9.16
48.40
1
1,598
1,752
1
607
1,461
3,632
5.92S
5.635
3,063
6.011
5.713
33,028,399.95 33,s04,619.9s 33,056,179.95 100.00% 1,014 763 4.812 4.879
Total Earnlngs November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date
Current Year
Average Dally Balance
Effectlve Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available
135,440.65
32,889,255.14
5.01c/c
funds to meet Burllngame's
793,365.35
35,624,414.93
5.31o/o
expenditure regulr€ments for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e,9. Gas Tax, Trust &Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).r1 ;RAHN A. BECKER,DIR./TREASURER
Portfollo CITY
CP
PM (PRF-PMl ) SymRept V5.02,
Run Oate: 1211012001 .12i23
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Detalls . lnvestments
November 30, 2001
Purchalo
Date Par Valu6
Statod
Book Valuc Rate Moody's
Page 2
CUSIP lnvortmcnt f lsruer
Average
Balanco Market Value
YTM Dale to
385 Maturlty
Maturlty
Dato
LAIF & County Pool
77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.
S M COUNTY POOL
Subtotal and Average
10,331,916.06
3,6S6,4E3.89
10,331,916.06
3,696,483.6e
10,331,910.06
3,696,4E3.89
3.520
4.120
3.526
4,12079
13,E61,475.14 14,028,399.95 14,028,309.95 14,028,309.95 3.883 'l
CORP NOTES
0739028M9
37042R2C5
487
489
BEAR STEARNS CORP
GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP
Subtotal and Av.rage
03/021999
04t20t1999
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,090,000.00
1,022,500.00
6.150
6.750
6,1 79
5.6E5
822 03t02t2004
151 08t10t2002
3,027,,780.00 3,000,000.00 3,112,500.00
1,997,500.00
1,030,280.00
3,027,780.00 6.011 007
Federal Agency lssues . Coupon
313311KK3
31S3M3TS4
3't33M7Y75
3133M025
3133MF2D9
3I33MFUB2
3133MHJ62
3136F0Y29
499
478
488
494
498
500
504
502
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEOEML HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FANNIE MAE
Subtotal and Averagc 10,303,720.00 r0,000,000.00
5.800 1,055
6.020 471
6.000 842
6.250 1,530
5.630 1,635
5.250 1,137
5.550 1,7A2
_g 1Ja-
5,713 1,461
04h312001
03/1 7/1 998
0312211995
02108t2001
o512412001
07t1112001
09128t2001
0812812001
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,040,000,00
1,044,000.00
2,115,000.00
2,015,620.00
2.035,000.00
't,003,440.00
2,023,120.00
4,067,480.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5.800
6.020
6.000
6.250
5.030
5.250
5.550
5.420
08/13/2006
03117t2003
03t22t2004
02108t2006
0512412006
01/1 1/2005
o9128t2008
o8l28t2006
18,000,000.00 16,000,000.00
Total lnwrtmcntr and Averagc 32,885,255.14 33,02E,399.05 33,5(N,610.05 33,050,170.05 4.870 763
Portfolio CIW
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.04
Run Data: M0n001 - 12:23
ll
1
1
t
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity By Type
November 1,2001through November 30, 2OOl
Page 3
CUSIP lnvoatment # bsuer
Baglnnlng
Balance
Stated
Rate
Tranractlon
Datc
Purchases
or Doposlts
SaIGS/Maturltle!
or Wlthdrawals
Endlng
Balance
LAIF & County Pool (Monthty Summary)
77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.79 SMCOUNTYPOOL
3.52A
4.120
1 't9,948.52
321,636.65
0.00
0.00
Subtotal 13,586,8{4.78 u1,585.17 0.00 14,028,309.S5
CORP NOTES
Subtotal 3,027,780.00 3,027,780.00
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
Subtotal 16,000,000.00 {3,000,000.00
Total 32,414,594.78 441,585.17 0.00 33,056,170.95
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRepr V5,02f
Run Oate: 12110f2O01 .12:23
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Actlvity Summary
November 2000 through November 2001
Ylold to Maturlty Managcd
Page 4
Average
Oays to Maturlty
Month Number of
Securltles
Total
lnvoltod
360Equlvalent Equlvalent
365 Pool
Rato
Number
of Sacurltlca
Purchared
Number
of Securltla3
Maturcd / Sold
Averago
TermEndYear
November
December
January
February
March
Aprll
May
June
July
August
Septomber
October
November
2000
2000
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
200,1
2001
2001
2001
18
18
17
17
't5
34,303,01 1.62
36,671,750.34
35,405,206.28
35,707,733.22
34,010,264.54
37,255,372.54
38,758,088.2s
36,085,177.06
38,447,819,42
38,002,167.12
34,930,381.22
32,614,594.78
33,056,179.95
6.185
6.165
6.084
5.994
5.963
5.737
s.609
5.431
5.396
5,287
5.3s2
4.880
4.812
6.271
6.251
6.169
6.077
6.046
5.817
5.687
5.507
5.471
5.361
5.426
4.948
4.879
6.380
6.311
6.130
5,979
5.869
5.417
5.200
4.767
4.632
4,4U
4.2',t4
3.809
3.683
0
0
,|
3
2
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
I
2
1
1
0
0
1,127
1,054
1,041
1,0s3
998
931
948
989
1,047
1,089
1,289
1,028
1,014
660
599
591
727
688
671
695
7U
817
860
1,020
791
763
14
14
13
15
14
15
12
12
Avorage 15 35,788,288.18 5.6070/o 5.6S5% 5.14 11 1,047 742
Portfollo CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMa) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 1211012001 -'12123
tI
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Distributlon of lnvestments By Type
November 2000 through November 2001
August S€ptGmbor
2001 2001
October November
2001 2001
Page 5
Average
by Parlod
lnvestment Type
LAIF & County Pool
November Deccmbcr2000 2000
FebruaryJanuary
20012001
March
200{
Aprll
2001
May
2001
June July
20012001
34.5 38.7 39.3 34.3 36.9
Certlflcates of Deposit - Bank
42.4 41.9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 38,0%
Gertiflcates of Deposlt. S & L
Gertlflcates of Deposlt.Thrlft & Ln
Negotlable CD's . Bank
CORP NOTES 8.8 8.3 8.6 8.5 7,8 8.4 8.08.9 8.1 7,9 8.7 9.3 9,2 8.50/oBankers Acceptances
Gommerclal Paper - lntorest Bearlng
Gommercial - Dlscount
Federal Agency lssues .Coupon 56.7 53.1 52.1 57.3 54,2 49,5 50.3 51.3 55.9 53.9 il.4 49.'l 53.670Federal Agency lssues . Olscount
Securltles - Coupon
Treasury Securltles - Dlscount
Mlscellaneous Securlties .Coupon
Mlscellaneous Securltles . Dlscount
Non lnterest Bearlng lnvestmontS
Backed Securitles
Mlscellaneouc Dlscounts -At Cost 2
Mlscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMs) SymRept v5.o2f
Run Oate: 1A102:001 .12:23
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnterest Earnlngs Summary
November 30,2001
Novomb€r 30 Month Endlng Flscal Yoar To Dato
Page 6
CD/Coupon/Dlscount lnvostm€nt5:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnter$t at End of P€rlod
Less Accrued lnter€st at Beglnnlng of Perlod
Lsss Accrued lnt6r$t at Purchase During P8riod
lnier6st Eamed duiing Perlod
AdJusted by Capltal Galns or Losses
Eamings during Period
56,300.00
268,439.99
232,690.00)
0.00)
620,900.00
268,439.99
337,083.33)
0.00)
92,049.99
0.00
ss2,256.66
1,250.00
92,049.99 553.506.66
Pa$ Through Securltles:
lntorsst Collocted
Plus Accrued lnter€st at End of Poriod
Less Accru€d lnterost at Beglnnlng of P€riod
Less Accrued lntsrest al Purchas€ Oudng Pedod
Interost Eamsd during Period
Adjusted by Pr€mlums and Dls@unts
Adjusted by Capital Galns or Loases
Eamings during Perlod
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
Cash/Ghecklng Accounlg:
lntorest Collscted
Plus Acqu€d lnterest at End of Perlod
Less Accrued lnterest at Beglnnlng of Perlod
lnterest Eamed during Poriod
119,948.52
308,016.78
384,s74.64)
357,562.02
308,0'16.78
425,720.11)
43,390,66 239,858.69
Total lnter.st Earned durlng Perlod
Total Capltal Galns or Losses
135,440.65
0.00
792,115.35
1,250.00
Total Earnlngs durlng Perlod 135,440.65 793,365.35
Run Orl€: 1211012001 .12:23
Portfollo CITY
CP
PM (PRF-PM6) stlnR3pt v5.021
(
(
(
(
(
(
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2001
lnvestments
Federal Agency lssues. Coupon
lnvestments
Total Earnlngs November 30 Month
Par
Value
800,000.00
Markot
Valuc
E02,000.00
'/t ol
Po16ollo
100.00
100.00%
Book
Value Term
1,756
1,756
Dayr to
Maturlty
653
653
YTM
360 Equlv.
4.995
4.995
YTM
385 Equlv.
5.064
s.064
825,752.OO
800,000.00 829,752,00 802,000.00
Endlng Flscal Year To Date
Cunent Year 3,416.67 17,063.34
Average Oally Balance 802,000.00 802,000.00
Effecilve Rate of Return 3,18%5.08%
Pursuant to State law, there are sufflcient avallable funds to meet Burlingame,s expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months, Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, andls restricted by law (e.9. Gas Capltal Projects, and Enterprlse funds).
Rahn Becker,, Finance Director/Treasurer
Tax, Trust & Agency funds,
///r/,
Portfotio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PMl) SyrnRepr V5.O2f
Run Oate: 12110n001 . 12.23
custP lnvaatmantt lBauer
Aver.ge
Balanc6
Purch.3a
D|l.MrrkgtValue
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
November 30,2001
Page 2
Stat d
Bookvalu. RaL
YTM Day3 to
385 Maturlty
Maturlty
Data
LAIF
79 LOCALAGENCY INV, FO 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.707
Subtotal and Avaraga 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.000 0
F€d€r8l Agency lssu€s - Coupon
31331\i5QB9 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Avoraoa
802,000.00 5.125 5.084 653 09/15/2003
5.064 05:i
'11t24h954 629,752.00
802,000.00 800,000.00 820,7s2.00 802,000.00
802,000.00 800,000.00 029,752.00 802,000.00 5.064 653
Run OBt€: 121ol2001 - 12:23
Portfollo 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymR.pl V5.02r
800,000.00
Total lnvaatn.nL d AvaraCc
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2001
lnvestments
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
Total Earnlngs
Par
Valuo
Market
Value
Book
Valus
t/c ol
Portfollo Term
1,826
Da!,s to
iilaturlty
480
480
YTM
360 Equlv,
5.977
5.977
YTM
385 Equlv.
6.060
6.060
1,7 t0,000.00 1,787,480.10 1,710,000.00 100.00
1,710,000.00 1,787,480,10 1,710,000.00 100.00% 1,926
November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date
Cunent Year
Average Dally Balance
Effectlve Rate of Retum
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available
8,587.79 43,391,68
1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00
6.11c/c 6.05%
funds to meet Budingame,s expenditure requlrements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, andrestricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds,Capital Projects, and Enterprlse tunds).4,RAHN BECKER, Finance Dlrector/Treasurer
Portfolio 98BD
OP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.O2t
Run Date: 12n0n0u .,t2:24
CUSIP lnve3tment # l$uer
Av.rage
Balance
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfollo Detalls - lnvestments
November 30,2001
Purchasc
Oat Par Value
Stated
Book Value Rale Moody'rMark6t valuc
YTM Dayt to
365 Maturlty
Page2
Maturlty
Date
Managed Pool Accounts
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.'t2480LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUNO
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0Subtotal and Avcrage
Federal Agency Goupon Securltles
3'|33M3XE0 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1 ,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 4E0 03/26/2003
8.060 rl80
03/26119S8 1,710,000.00 1,787,400.10
Subtotsl and Average t,710,000.00 1,7t0p00.00 1,787,480.10 1,710,000.00
1,710,000.00 1,787'll80.10 1,710,000.00 0.060 /t80
Total lnvestmentr and Average 1,710,000.00
Portfollo 98BD
CP
PM (PRF-PM2) SymRopt V5.02tRun Oate: lAlOnOo1 .12124
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2OOl
lnvestments Par
Valuo
Markot
Value
Book
Valuo 'h ol
Portfollo
Dayr to
MaturltyTerm
YTM
380 Equlv.
YTM
365 Equlv.Managed Pool Accounts
Federal Agency Coupon Securifles
lnvostmsnts
12,580,34S.52
1,'r00,000.00
12,580,349,52
1j25,432.00
12,580,U9.52
1,100,000.00
1
1,826
148
91.00
8.04
1
1,7't8
139
3.478
5.474
3.638
3.526
5.550
3.689
13,590,349.52 13,705,791.52 13,680,349.52 100.00%
Total Eamlngs November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date
Current Year
Average Dally Balance
Effectlve Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are sufflcient available
42,899.67
13,751,918.{9
3,80./c
funds to meet Burlingame's
189,0't1.59
& Agency funds, Capltal preects, and Enterprise funds).
expenditure requlrements for the coming 6 months. Total funds lnvested represent consolidation of some of these funds ls
/L/rr/,
Rahn A.Eecker, Finance Dir./Treasurer
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PMr) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date: 1211012001 - 12124
Avorag6
Balanc6
O1 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfollo Detalls - lnvestments
November 30,2001
Purchare
Dato Par Value Market Value
Stated
BookValuc Rate
YTM YTM DaFIo
365 Maturlty
Page2
Maturlty
DatoCUSIPlnve3tment # lgluer 360
Manag€d Pool Accountg
81 Local Agency lnv. Fd 08/09/2001 12,580,349.s2 12,580,Us.52 12,580,349.52 3.526 3.416 3.526
t.478 3.526 1Subtotal and Average 12,051,8{6.{9 {2,580,340.52 12,580,:r49.52 {2,580,349.52
Federal Agency Goupon Securltles
3133MGQR0 503 Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Avcrage
08/1 5/2001 1,'100,000.00 1,125,432.00 1,1oO,OOO.00 5.550 5,474 5.550 1,718 08/15/2006
I,100,000.00 5.47a 5.550 1,7181,100,000.00 I,100,000.00 1,125,43r2.OO
Total lnvcrtments and Average 13,75't,816.19 13,680,349.52 13J05,7E1.52 13,6E0,340.52 3.638 3.6E9 130
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 1211012001 - 12i24
L2-L4-0a SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES
FOR: NOVEMBER, 200L
Last
CurrenL Year..Crime Classification
Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter
Manslaughter by Negligence
Rape By Force
Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape
Robbery Firearm
Robbery Knife
Robbery Other Dangrerous Weapon
Robbery Strong-Arm
Assault - Firearm
Assault - Knlfe
Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon
Assault - Hands, Fists, Feet
Assault - other (Simple)
Burglary - Forcible Entry
Burglary - Unlawful Entry
Burglary - Attempted Forcibl-e EntryLarceny Pocket-Picking
Larceny Purse-Snatching
Larceny Shoplifting
Larceny From Motor Vehicle
Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories
Larceny Bicycles
Larceny From Building
Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine
Larceny AIl Other
Motor Vehicle Theft AuLo
Motor Vehicle Theft Bus
Motor Vehicle Theft Other
PAGE: 1
Act
YTD.
Prev
Act
YTD.
0 Z
0
0
7
1
2
1
6
10
1
6
0
0
10
1
7
Z
3
1,2
aZ
4
L6
5
1
1
1
15
6
9
1
1
0
6
1B
9
4
193
L22
65
7
4
5
33
LZ+
40
30
311
L2
64
Lt6
az
z
t6
'7
L96
58
6B
5
5
7
3B
L2B
61,
2L
238
13
40
9L
15
5
1
10
6
9
3
1
33
13
L2
Q1 75 7,192 1,046
87 75 1_,l.92 1,046
12-L4-0L MONTHLY SUMMARY OF
CITY REPORT FOR:
PART TWO OFFENSES
NOVEMBER, 2OOI
PAGE: 1
Last
Current Year
32
aZ
aZ
Act
YTD
38 489
1)
15
3
5
55
38
11
94
35
1
6B
2t
0
0
0
.)
0
23
91
18
0
6T
5Z
..7
1
32
97
5Z
181
4B
aZ
5
Prev
Act
YTD.Crime Classification.
All Other Offenses
Animal Abuse
Animal Nuisance
Arson
Assists to Outside Agencies
Bicycle Violations
Bigamy
Bomb Offense
Bomb Threat
Bribery
Check Offenses
ChiId Neglect/prot custody
Computer Crime
Conspiracy
Credit Card Offenses
Cruelty to Dependent Adult
Curfew and Loitering Laws
Death Investigat.ion
Disorderly Conduct
Driver' s License Violations
Driving Under the Influence
Drug Abuse Violations
Drug/Sex Registrants
Drunkeness
Embezzlement
Escape
Extort ion
False Pol-ice Reports
False Reports of Emergency
Fish and Game Viol-ations
Forgery and Counterfeiting
Found Property
Fraud
Gambl ing
Harrassing Phone Ca1ls
Hit and Run Accidents
Impersonation
Incest
Indecent Exposure
Intimidating a Witness
Kidnapping
Lewd Conduct
Liquor Laws
Littering/Dumping
Mari j uana Violat.ions
Mental Healt.h CasesMissing Person
Missing Property
Municipal Code Violat.ions
Narcotics Sales/Manufacture
Offenses Against Chil_dren
464
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
10
0
1
0
75
0
z
4
3
3
az
0
1-4
0
0
0
1
3
0
t4
0
1
4
0
10
0
0
U
10
n
t-5
30
1
1
'7
T7
5
5
2
3
t,
1
4
Z
1
4
3
2
13
3
6
2
15
aZ
3
9
5
3
37
0
63
11
0
0
0
0
0
2L
90
0
B4
4B
1
0
11
0
0
3
5
.>
2
44
79
33
107
55
1
13
L2-14-0L
Crime Classification
Other Assaults
Other Juvenile Offenses
Other Police Service
Pandering for j-mmoral purposes
Parole Vi-olations
Perj ury
Possession of Burglary TooIs
Possession of drug paraphernalia
Possession of obscene literature;picture
Probation Violations
Prostitution and Commercial Vice
Prowling
Resi-sting Arrest
Runaways (Under 18)
Sex Offenses
Sex Offenses against Children
Sodomy
Stalking
Statutory Rape
StoIen Propert.y; Buying; Receiving; Possess
Suspended Lj-cense
Tax Evasion
Temp Restraining Orders
Terrorist Threats
'I'owed Vefrrc-Le
Trespass j-ng
Truant s f Incorrigible Juvs
US MaiI Crimes
Vagrancy
Vandal ism
Vehicle Code Violations
Violation of Court. Order
Warrants - Felony
Warrants - Misd
Weapons ; Carrying, Possessing
Welfare Fraud
MONTHLY SUIVIMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES
CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2001
PAGE: 2
Last
Current Year.
1B 15
6
z 1
Z
18
Act
YTD
Prev
Aal-
YTD.
1
L96
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
0
5
0
0
5
1
0
6
0
1
54
0
56
0
193
1
150
U
Z
U
0
U
0
24
2
4
3
0
6
6
U
z
0
5
52
0
1
2 2
1
49
5
3
51
1
1
2
1
2
1
20
1
3)
4
Z
57
33
567
7
7
0
0
225
45
2L
B
59
15
0
402
L6
1
0
0
27'7
13
21,
10
56
9
0
242 2a9 3,031 2,569
242 2L9 3,037 2,569
12 -T4 - 0L
Crime Classification
Parking Citations
Moving Citations
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS
CITY REPORT
FOR: NOVEMBER, 200L
Last
Current Year
PAGE: 1
2 ,595
1,32
2 ,825
L97
Anl
YTD
30 ,456
2 ,224
Prev
Act
YTD.
32,448
2 ,641_
2,727 3,022 32,680 35,089
2,727 3 ,022 32,680 35, 089
rl
Officer Productivity. . . .
Reported On: A11 Officers
Data Type Reported on: PARKING
Officer:ID:
valid
Cnt
BURLINGAME
generated on 12/74/2001 at 10:01:48 AM
Report Range: 11 /0L/2007 to 7t/30/200L
* AI1
Valid
Voids
Cnt
t All
voidg valid
t
DAZA-QUIROZ
GARRETT
JFOX
KTRKPATRICK
MORAN
ROSCOE
634
501
505
502
20L
503
567
434
282
49
113 6
74
22.31
L7.01
1,1.09
1,.93
44 .69
)q1
21.88
43.15
L2.50
3.13
18 .75
0.00
7
t4
4
1
6
0
98.78
96.88
98.60
98.00
99 .47
100.00
total 2542 32
Page 1 of 1
The City of Burlingame
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Td:(65O1 558-7230
Fax(66O1 685-9310
CITY HAI.I - 5OT PRIMROSE ROAO
BURTINGAME, CALTFORNIA 9401 G3997
CORPORATION YARO
Tel:(65O1 558-7670
DearMs. Macdonald;
Thank you for your letter and concern.
This intersection has been rwiewed periodically for many years. A request for firnding intersection improvementsis in the current Five Year Capital Improvement plan bui not yet funded. your suggestion of a lighted crosswalksimilar to one installed by the city of san Mateo is a very gold oo. for noticing the motorists of crosswalk use.It is one ofthe strong options that has had stafflevet s"pplort and that will beieviewed when seeking fundingapproval.
The Police Department reviewed the partrgular accident you wrote of, A number violations by the bike rider mayhave been the cause of this accident- The Police Deparrnent also reviewed the accident history. Both motoristsand pedestrian appear to be handling the intersection well as this remains a low accident rate intersection.
Again thank you for the letter of concern. Please feel free to contact either myself or the City Engineer, SyedMurfuz4 at the number above if you have any further questions.
December 28,20[1
Mary Macdonald
342Elm Street
San lvlateo,CA9440l
342-2312
Re: Your Letter of December 16,2001
Pedestian Crosswalk at California Drive
and Lorton Ave.
C. Erbacher
Assistant Director Ofpubtic Works
c- City Clerk; City Manager; City Attorney; City Engineer
S:\A Public works Dircctory\Author, By Name\Frank Erbacher Lrtters\macdonard.rtr.wpd
.{,city council
pcity Manager
\City Attomey
il Dir. Finance
respond
lJ No Response Required
December 16,2001
City Council
City ofBurlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
n City Planner
5(Dir. Public works
I Human Resources
- Police Chief
tl Fire Chief
Parks & Rec
!l Librarian
{on Next Agenda
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR
RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK
Dangerous Pedestrian Crosswalk
California Drive near Irrton
Dear Council Members:
I am not sure that you are the Body to whom I should address a concern regarding a
pedestrian crosswalk which is extremely dangerous in Burlingame. If I have addressed the wrong
group with my request, I ask that you will forward my letter to the appropriate individual(s) for
consideration and attention. I would appreciate a reply to this letter.
I commute from the Burlingame Train Station to San Francisco by Calfiain weekdays. I
park my car in the commuter lot next to Royal Donut. I cannot tell you how many times I have
seen individuals attempt to use the cross walk on busy California drive who either almost get hit,
bring traffrc to a screeching halt, or have to wait a long time to cross the street because auto
drivers are so self-absorbed that they don't even notice a pedestrian tying to cross the street.
Additionally, it is dark in the winter months by 5:30-6 p.m. during the evening commute. Last
week @ecember l0th), I witnessed on my evening return from San Francisco via the train that a
car had hit a man who was riding a bike across this crosswalk. Another commuter who also
witnessed this accident had a cell phone and catled 9-l-1. The police, fire engine and paramedics
responded immediately.
The cross-walk in question is on California Drive (across the sfieet from Stack's
Restaurant). There is also a SamTrans bus stop and bench very near to the crosswalk as well.
(You could check with the police officers who handled the accident report for December l0th at
approximately 6 p.m. for specifics if I am not giving you enough information as to the location of
the crosswalk).
Something really needs to be done to make this cross-walk safe for pedestrians (as well as
for traveling motorists). I recommend that blinking light strips be installed (similar to the ones
that have been installed on Fourth Avenue in San Mateo just down the street from Strouds at El
Camino and near to Pasta Primavera also on Fourth Avenue. I believe that installation of such
blinking pedestrian light strips would alert drivers that there is a pedestrian cross walk present
and just might save someone's life.
As I mentioned, I commute every day and witness the difficulty that pedestrians have at
this crosswalk. I hope you can immediately address this request and implement a solution.
Thank you for your attention and happy holidays.
Sincerely,
Mary Macdonald
342 Elm Street
San Mateo, CA94401
650 342 2312
cc:Burlingame Police Departrnent
Burlingame City Attorney's Office
Burlingame City Manager's Office
MopQuelt: Driving Directions
!
**.ri
,irucrJ
Ialn S Set rsqHfrTRIX FRf;fr on DvD
FR€€ Shtpplng & Hondtlng Tlll iis
*fer'r
YEU.OW PSGESNOAD TTIP PTANNTA*1APS
driving directions
' North America
. Europe
. Saved Routes
City Guide
. San Francisco Dinino
. San Francisco News
r San Francisco Movies
. San Francisco
Entertainment
Yellow Pages
Search Burlingame for
FROM:
2OO California Dr
Burlingame, CA
94010 US
Total Distance: 0.15 miles
TO:
361 California Dr
Burlingame, CA
94010 US
Total Estimated Time: 1 minute
DISTANCE
0.15 miles
Tota!
Distance:
O.15 mlles
HELP ?
AIM
AIM
E-mail
EOU?t
DIRECTIONS
1: Start out going Northwest on CAUFORNIA DR
towards SOUTH LN by turning right.
Total Estimated Time:
1 minute
Need help finding a local business?
Trv our Yellow Paoes!
ROUTE OVERVIEW:
fl,ffitfl,*Eot*ftiAp*nu @ Zoom In 0 Re-center
All riohts reserved. Use Subiect
to License/Coovrioht
IOOti
li{
EI
-J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
rd
zoa*r
ouT
Auto r L
?
Search
DESTINATION:
Map Leoend ffi
Page I of 2
Home I HeIp
,,'::
hrylturvwnaqE*ccr*frEdirutuins+?gFl@tp&tc*dingilb&ls{A&la340l0&lyf_6de#kffcnir+Dir,e&&ac+dinsme-.