Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.01.07.:.CLOSED SESSION Pending Litigation (Govemment Code g 5a956.9(a)): Louis Marini vs. city of Burlingamg San Mateo Superior court Case No. Ct\t 4l93gz BT]RLINGAME CITY COI]NCIL AGENDA Rncrn.ln lt{nnrnrc - Moxnay Jarunny 7,2A0Z PAGE 1 oF3 Threatened Litigation (Government Code g 54956.9(b)(l), (3XC)) Demand of State of California 1. CALLTOORDBR 2. 3. ROLLCALL 4' MINUTES - Special Meeting ofDecernb er r7,2llr;Regurar Meeting ofDecember 3,200r & speciar pranning/counci-l Meeting of November 28,2001 5. CBR]EMONIAL MATTERS a Badge Pinning Rocque yball4 Deputy Fire Marshal 6' PUBLIC HEARTNGS Thcmayormayrimitspeakcntothrecminutaach a- ordinance Revising Fees for water Service (Frow Tests, Temporary rrtrfater Services and Meter krstallations) b- Request forpermit to keep three dogs, 1252 capuchino Ave. CiA of Barlingag,e'. ";CITY HALL - SOI PNTM,OSE ROAD BT.JRLINGAM4 CALIFORNIA 940 I 0(650)55&7200 ',,;' . i: S-a-G_GE;TED-AQlrgtN 6:30 p.m., Conference Room A Adopt 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Approval Presentation Hearing/Action Review Discussion/Inhoduction 7. 8. LUBLIC C0MMENTS At rhis tinre persms in the audience may speak m any Iry.q 1[ agenda m any other matrer *itt in o" ;*isdictim of the co,ncir. Thenalnh M. Brown Ac1(th€-slate locar agency qen-mecting law; pr*rruits "o,r"n r-r'acting or any matrer which is not on o. ,g*d;. rt i, ur-p"ii"vli-".,rliro,"ro such matters to stafffr investigatiur andL actiqr. n " M"x;;tti*irp""r..". tothnee minutes each. a. Housing Element Review by Council b- consider Introduction of ordinance Restricting Hours for Ioading and Unloading that cause a noise disturbance in a residential district c. Adopt Resolution oflntention to considerrerroval of the cityofDaly city from boundaries of San Mateo county Tourism Businesslnprovement District and Intnoduce ordinanc" i**oig Dstrictto remove Daly City fiom boundaries ofDistict Adopt/Inhoduce BT]RLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGEI\IDA IfEcur,AB Mnnrmrc - Moxn^lv Jluulnv 712002 Plcn2 or3 CW of Burlingamo CITY HALL - 501 PRIIVROSE ROAI) SURUNCAI\,TS, CALIFORNIA 949I O (650) 558-7200 Approve Set Hearing t 9.CONSENT CALEI\IDAR - Items on the Consent Calendar are acted on "@;".r r.pu.ii discussion and/or action are requestedby a cormcil mmber. a. Resolution Accepting Burlingame Shoreland Easement Sewer Rehabilitation City Project No. 9853(2) b. Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant - BART Shuttle & Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreeme,nt and Grant - CalTrain Shuttle c. Requastby ciuLibrarian to attend out of state conference'in Arizona d. Warants & PaYroll November, 2001 e. Annual Report on RCN Fiber Cable Installation f. Approve Unit Reduction for Assessment Basis for Bel-Mateo iviotel from 32 units to 23 units under the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement Dishict COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS OLD BUSII\IESS NEW BUSINESS a. Setting an Appeal Hearing fot ll47 Rollins Road ACKNOWLBDGMENTS aCommissionMinutes:PlanningDec'10&Dec'19'2001; Beautification, Dec- 6; Traffic, Dec' 13; Library, Nov' 13 b.De,partmentReports:BuildingNov',Z}0l;Finance'Nov'30' 2001; Police, November, 2001 c.IrtterfromDorothyAzevedo-Scorpiniti,Burlingame,CA regarding BART coming to Burlingame e. Irtter from Mary Macdonald,34zBlm Street, San Mateo regarding dangerous pedestrian crosswalk at california & Lorton; response from Frank Erbacher 10. 11. 12. 13. BURLINGAME CITY COT]NCIL AGENDA Rncur,.lR Mrnrntc - Monroay Jamtany 7rZ00Z PAGE 3 oF3 14. ADJOURJ\MENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558- T203atleast2{hoursbeforethemeeting. AcopyoftheAgendaPacketisavailableforpublicreviewatthe City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before thc meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site or listen live on our LIVE365 Broadcast via the website. NEXT MEETING -23,2002 CiA of Burlingsme CIry HALL. 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BI.]RLINGAME, CALIFORMA 940 I O (650) 558-7200 UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAMB, CALIFORNIA December l7r200l 1. SPECIAL MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A special meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in Conference Room A. The meeting was called to order at 5:01 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney. 2. ROLL CALL Council Present: Council Absent: Respectfully submitted, Cr^-J c/4Arr.o BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY None 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 4. STUDY SESSION a. Studv Session Resardine POA Neeotiations City Manager Nantell noted the reason for the closed session was to discuss the current negotiations with the Police Officers Association. 5. CLOSED SESSION: Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: City Negotiators: City Manager, Human Resources Director, IDEA Labor Organization: Burlingame Police Officers Association, City Attorney. Council adjourned to closed session to discuss the POA negotiations and to instruct the City's negotiators. 6. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 5:35 p.m. Ann T. Musso City Clerk 1Burlingame City Council December 17,2001 UNAPPROYED MINUTES BURLINGAME, CALItr'ORNIA I)ecember 3,2001 CLOSED SESSION: Conference with Real Property Negotiations pursuant to Government Code $ 54956.8:a. Property: City Parking Lots K and L Negotiators: City Manager, City Attorney, City Planner, Public Works Director & City Engineer Negotiating Parties: Safeway Stores, Inc. Under Negotiation: Exchange of property involving parking spaces. Instruction to include area to be exchanged and consideration for exchange. CA Anderson noted Council met in closed session at 6:15 p.m. regarding the above referenced matter. 1. RJGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDEB A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:03 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA}ICE TO THE FLAG Led by Officer J Mason. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: Council Absent: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of November 19, 2001 and November 20,2001; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. CEREMONIAL Chief Missel presented a commendation to Sergeant James Ford, Officer Charles Witt, Oflicer Dale Wild and Communication Dispatcher Christine Granucci for their exceptional work at a police incident on November 16, 2001. IBurlingame City Council December 3,2001 6. PUBLICHEARINGS a, AdoDt Ordinance #1674 to chan se Parkins Meter Rates in the Burlingame Avenue Business District Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Charlie Dreschler and David Kincaid spoke in opposition of raising the parking meter rates. CliffWoods, Chicken Chicken, spoke in favor of raising the parking meter rates. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Ordinance #1674 to raise parking meter rates in the Burlingame Avenue Business District; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. Review of the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant a Parking Variance for a Chanse in Use from Retail to Oflice Use at 247 California Drive. Zoned C-l Subarea B. Burlineame Avenue Commercial Area CP Monroe recommended Council hold a public hearing to review the Planning Commission's decision to grant a parking variance for a change in use from retail to office use at 247 California Drive. Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, Attomey for London Road Desigr, spoke on behalf of the owner/tenant. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Councilman Galligan noted that this business generates over $1 million in taxable sales each year; believes it is a retail business and a parking variance is not required. He then moved to make this a determination, thereby making the variance moot because a retail use would be replacing another retail use. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. Councilman Galligan, maker of the motion, suggested a modification to the motion that graphics and desigr businesses with substantial taxable sales should be considered retail businesses. The amendment was agreed to by the second. There was more discussion and Vice Mayor Coffey suggested that the motion be further amended to note that graphics and desigr businesses should only be considered retail if they are pedestrian friendly and have walk-in retail business. The maker and second of the original motion agreed and clarified that the business being discussed was a "graphic art and design business". Mayor Janney called for a voice vote on the determination to define graphic art and design business as a retail business so long as it met the several criteria established. The motion passed on a 5-0 voice vote. c. Public Hearins on Aoplication for Off-Sale Liquor License at 1400 Burlineame Avenue CA Anderson noted the owners of the Burlingame Smoke Shop, 1400 Burlingame Avenue, have applied for an off-sale liquor license with the Alcohol Beverage Control Departrnent. The ABC looks at the concentration ofliquor stores and stores that sell liquor within census tract; from those census tract they determine ifunder Califomia Law, there appears to be an over concentration ofsales ofliquor in that area. The ABC is obligated under state law to notifu the city and allow the City Council to make a recommendation or determination to the ABC as to whether this off-sale liquor permit application serves Bnrlingame CityCouncil ' Oecember 3, 2001 DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Ordinance #167 4 to raise on-street parking meter rates in the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District. the public convenience a necessity. CA Anderson recommended Council hold a public hearing to determine what recommendation to communicate to the ABC regarding the off-sale license application at 1400 Burlingame Avenue. Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Randall Kaufrnann, 1501 Chapin #105, and Tom Paine, 728 Concord Way, spoke in favor ofthe issuance of a liquor license at this location. Ashook Patel, owner of the Burlingame Smoke Shop, also spoke in favor ofreceiving the off-sale liquor license application at 1400 Burlingame Avenue and stated that liquor would only be sold from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve the off-sale liquor license at 1400 Burlingame Avenue from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; seconded by Mayor Janney, approved by voice vote, 4-1, with Councilman Galligan dissenting. d. Adopt Ordinance #1675 Deletin e Section 6.08.09 0 Regardine Airport Parkins Facility Business Licen se Tax to Conform Code to Measure O Adooted on N ber 6.200I CA Anderson noted that as part of the process ofbeing ready to implement the proposal contained in Proposition Q adopted by the voters on November 6, 2001, the Municipal code must be amended to delete the current provision regarding airport parking facilities. The proposed Ordinance would provide the transition on November 30, 2001, from the airport facility tax to the commercial parking facility tax for any business that is subject to both. Measure Q will go into effect on November 30. Both taxes are payable on a quarterly basis, so this ordinance seeks to clarify the payment dates for the current quarter under the transition. Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance #167 5; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilman Galligan recusing himself due to owning share in a parking facility in a neighboring city. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jo Chamberlain, 501 Lucy Lane, Half Moon Bay, and Patricia Gray, l616 Adeline Drive, spoke regarding the Green Party in Burlingame. Dan Anderson, 728 Vemon Way, spoke regarding the preservation of Washington Park. 8. STAT'T'RE PORTS AIID CO CATIONS a. Introduce Ordinance for Revisions to Fees for W ater Service (Flow Tests. Tempo rary Water Services and Meter Installation) DPW Bagdon recommended Council introduce the Ordinance to revise fees for water service (flow tests, temporary water service and meter installation). The existing water rates and connection fees were adopted by Council on July 16,2001, however, certain other fees relating to water services were not included in the adopted ordinance. 3 Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001 Mayor Janney requested CC Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilman Galligan made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney requested CC Musso publish a summary ofthe Ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b. Council Assisn ments for 2002 EA Weber recommended Council review and revise council assignments for the calendar ye ar 2002. c.Plannins Commissi on Aonointment Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to appoint Michael Brownrigg and Christopher Keele to the two vacant positions on the Planning Commission; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved by voice vote, 4-1, with Councilwoman O'Mahony dissenting. 9. CONSENTCALENDAR a.ADDrove Rota List for Offices of Mayor an d Vice Mavor EA Weber recommended Council approve the rotation list for Mayor and Vice Mayor for the coming year b. Resolution 132-2001Authorizins Transfer for Accountin Trainin g Contractg ACM Becker recommended Council approve Resolution #132-2001 authorizing $15,000 transfer from Reserve for Contingencies to Finance Conhactual Services. c. Resolution 133-2001 Aporovins t for Maintena nce of Athletic Fields at Franklin. McKinlev and Roosevelt Elementarv Sch ools and Burlinsame Inter te School DPR Schwartz recommended Council approve the Resolution #133-2001 approving Agreement for Maintenance of Athletic Fields at Franklin, McKinley and Roosevelt Elementary Schools and Burlingame lntermediate School. d.Authorize City ttornev to Join in Amicus Cu riae Brief in Bonnano vs. Cen Contra Costa Transit Authori Case N o. A087846 at no cost to the tv of Burlinsame City Attomey requested Council authorize him to join in Amicus Curiae Brief at no cost to the City in Bonnano vs. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority, which is now pending befote the Califomia Supreme Court. Comcilman Galligan made a motion to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 4 Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001 'a Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City. 11. OLD BUSINESS Councilwoman Baylock noted she had received some complaints regarding the live kansmission of Council meetings and offered some suggestions on how to remedy the problem. 12. NEW BUSINESS City Manager Nantell noted that the Public Works department was featured on a local newscast on Wednesday, November 28'h, during a very heavy storm. The newscast was shown to the Council. 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Commission Minutes: Planning, November 26,2001; Parks & Recreation, November 15, 20011, Library Board of Trustees, October 16,200l b. Department Reports: Police, October 2001 Letter from Ronald and Linda Field, 1249Paloma, regarding request to rezone Paloma/Lagona/C apuchino area 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Janney adjoumed the meeting at9:12 p.m. Respectfu lly submitted, a. c. 0,*3?wauD Ann T. Musso City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council December 3, 2001 CITY O['BT]RLINGAME JOINT CITY COUNCIL and PLAIINING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA November 28,2001 City Hall Conference Room A I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Janney called the November 28, 200l,joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Council Members: Baylock, Cof,ley, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony, md Planning Commissioners: Auran, Boju6s, Keighran, Key, Mink and Vistica Absent: Commissioner Osterling (arrived at7:25 p.m.) StaffPresent: City Manager Jim Nantell, City Planner, Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Larry Anderson. IV APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was suggested that item 4, regarding the scope and objectives of the proposed specific Area Plan for the north end of the city be done first since it would take less time and the workload/composition .of the Planning Commission discussion will follow. There was consensus about the change to the agenda. V. SCOPE AND OBJECTIYES O[' TIIE SPECIX'IC AREA PLAN STUDY II'OR TIIE NORTH END OF BURLINGAME CP Monroe reviewed the progress that the Planning Commission has made in defining the study area for the proposed Specific Area Plan and the scope. She noted that the Commission has appointed a subcommittee to work with her to further define the project scope and process for the RFP; she anticipates that the RFP would be circulated in January,2002. Discussion focused on: cost of the study and availability of money in the current planning budget to commence work; it was noted that it is timely to do this study, it should have a high priority and it is important to find a good consultant; subcommittee members are thinking about ways to refine the study, it should start with an assessment of the entire area and move from that to identiffing the focus for the more detailed specific area plan; glad that the entire M-l zoned area is included in the initial study area; Council should be included in the refining process identi$ing the SAP area after the broad based analysis; clarified that the proposed study area is entirely on the west side of 101; focused study should drop out areas which-are functioning all City of Burlingame Joint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2001 right now; given the impacts of BART and the dynamics created by that transit terminal, should the north end of the Bayfront area also be included; can put that in a subsequent study since the economic pressure is off at the moment and we have some development guidelines in place for the Bayfront area east of 101; don't want to take on too big an area at one time; there was considerable discussion around the issue of whether there is outside funding available for preparing the planning study and for making improvements once the specific area plan is in place; it was concluded that the future private developers' role in funding public improvements identified in the SAP should be addressed in the plan; an error on the map attachment was noted, the westerly boundary of the area on the map did not follow Marco Polo, this should be corrected; the plan should address the impacts of future electrification of the CalTrain line, especially the physical and visual impacts. There were no further comments on this item. C. Osterling arrived at7:25 p.m. VI. WORKLOAD AND COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION CM Nantell presented the staff report and suggested a round-table process for addressing this issue and identifuing areas of consensus. He pointed out that over the past several months there has been discussion among the Council, Planning Commission, press and public about how to structure the commission to address its work load and whether this should affect the organization of the commission. The staff report identified five perspectives on the issue. He asked that each council member and planning commissioner at the table speak for three minutes on the issues. At the end of each set of comments the others could ask clarifying questions. From this commentary the group would compile a list of concerns and interests, as well as identiffing where there was consensus. Council could then use this input in considering a strategy for filling the current vacancies on the Planning Commission, no action decisions would be made tonight. From the discussion there was strong consensus that the Planning Commission should continue to have 7 members and there was no desire presently to restructure the commission. A variety of reasons were identified for this conclusion including: that 7 provides a diversity of perspectives; provides a cushion for a quorum if someone is absent or must recuse themselves so business is not intemrpted; provides more members to share subcommittee responsibilities; allows a changing mix of commissioners and points of view on subcommittees; do not want to increase size so more able to miss meetings, but know commissioners are responsible and careful about attendance; with fewer than 7 do not think the subcommittee system would work; have had experience with 9 people on a cofilmission and it only elongates the meetings, 7 is a good size provides diversity with manageable size; diversity is good, present commission has proven they can operate effectively with diverse group, design professionals did a good job of developing guideiines which the lay people on the commission and new comers to the process can easily use; members of the commission need to have a holistic vision for the long term future of the community and the ability to work collaboratively with the public to achieve this vision. A second point of consensus was that there should be a mix of professionals with design sawy and lay people with a good understanding of the community on the Planning Commission. A variety of observations were made to support this: would like a mix of 3 to 4 (either way) of design and non-design oriented people on the commission that balance is was a key element in the Commission's many important accomplishments in the past few years and developed a a City of Burlingame Joint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2001 design review process which works with few complaints; prefer 3 professionals (could be contractors, architects, designers, engineers), but the lay people look at how proposal fits into the neighborhood; need a variety of professional expertise; would like at least two architects because they have the broadest understanding of development and spacial planning and can often spot design alternatives which can cause projects to comply with code requirements; with recent extension of design review it would be good to have someone with commercial design expertise; the contract design reviewers provide a safety net for a commission which may have fewer design/construction professionals in its make-up, such professionals may not always be in the applicant pool; lay commission should rely on the Planning staff and should be able to function without an architect; focus should be on getting the best people on the Planning Commission not meeting a quota of professionals; believe in the value of lay people on appointed boards and commissions so do not want the commission overwhelmed with professionals; support lay people, after a period of time they learn about issues and how to deal with the community; there will be change, system needs to be able to work with whoever is participating, staff has an obligation to help the Commission make the right decision. During the discussion there were four issues identified which the group concluded should be addressed in the future, most likely at the next joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission in February. These were: (l) what specific design skills need to be available on the commission; (2) what is the advantage and should be the scope of staff recommendations; (3) managing work load the commission needs the time to do long term planning; and (4) what is the appropriate screening process for projects destined to go to the Planning Commission. There were no further comments. YII. PUBLIC COMMENTS The following people spoke from the floor: Linda Abbey 2415 Adeline Drive; Ken Castle,l4ll Drake Avenue, Jerry Deal 1226 Paloma; Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater; Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington; Tom Paine ,728 Concord. Have raised issues regarding the Sisters of Mercy property with both the City Council and Planning Commission, was given contact at the campus to call when had a problem, called about a parking and safety problem and the person filed a complaint with the Police Department. Would like a clarification about the Brown Act and its range of control regarding discussion and dialogue between members of the public and the City Council, would the City Attorney look into this? Regarding tonight, have been frustrated that we have not done more broad based planning, developers feel that they can do the master planning for us without asking, residents need to be proactive; clear need to revise the General Plan, should be addressed by at least one item on each agenda; concerned about the lack ofan overall plan for the Bayfront, needs to be done before an application is made. Work often with the planning staff, do not have a Planning Department have a reaction deparhnent, need a planning staff that can plan development concepts; people forget that design professionals can do a lot of things, do need a contractor and engineer on the commission, Osterling's landscape skills are also useful; then need a couple of lay people; design professionals are reluctant to apply because ofthe negative things that have happened resulting in a why-get-involved mood; did have something good going need to change the public perception and recoup so more design professionals will apply. Thank Jerry Deal for spearheading all the design review; recall the original design for the library, it was terrible, evolved to a gem because people became involved, shows good comes from conflict; -3- City of Burlingame loint City Council and Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2001 people are more confident in the commission when there are professionals on it; this was certainly the case with the storage facility proposal on Howard. Would like to see diversity within categories on the Commission, need design community represented. The city needs to take into account the existing neighborhoods and have development complement what is existing, the city should undertake a master plan for recreation and park facilities for both preservation and expansion. There were no other comments from the floor. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Janney at 9:00 p.m. JtCCPCminl1.28.01 -4- STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL December 10, 2OO1 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 1t7 to2 6a TO: DATE: FROM: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REVISING FEES FOR WATER SERVICE (FLO SERVICES AND METER INSTALLATIONS} ESTS, TEMPORARY WATER RECOMMENDATION: It is reconrmended that City Council hold a public hearing to: A. Adopt proposed ordinance. B. Direct City Clerk to publish a srmrmary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: The existing water rates and connection fees were adopted by Council on July 16, ZOO| However, certain other fees relating to water services were not included in the adopted ordinance. DISCUSSION: The City charges fees for water flow tests, temporary water services and meter installations. Some of these fees have not been adjusted since 1983. The attached ordinance revises the fees to achieve full cost recovery for all labor and materials. Notice of the public hearing for January 7,2002, regarding the fee revisions was included in the water bills mailed throughout the city over the last two months. EXHIBITS: Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: This ordinance will not affect the operating budget as the costs incurred will be offset by the revenues received from tests, temporary water services and meter installations. Tel. 650-558-7230 t-.City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Ordinance 4 Water Svc 2.wpd lh- 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 t2 13 t4 15 T6 t7 l8 T9 20 21 22 Z) 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING REVISIONS TO FEES FOR WATER SERVICE The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section l. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No. 1660 adopted July 16, 2001. Notice of proposed revisions to the connection fees and of the public hearing on the fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the cost of installations and testing has increased substantially. The last increase in meter installation fees occurred in 1997 by Ordinance No. 1570. The last increase in flow testing fees occurred in 1983 in Resolution No. 9-83. These fees will better attribute the actual costs of system costs to the persons actually using the services rather to the ratepayers as a whole or to the City in general. In construction and maintenance of the City water system, the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and operate the water system. The fees adopted in this ordinance are not discriminatory or excessive. Section 2. Subsection (2X0 of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: (f) When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city according to the size of the service as follows: 5/8" through 1" $SO l'112" and 2" $80 Over 2" $100 minimum In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the testing fee and make adjustments in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar months preceding the date of the request for a test. In the event the meter was recording accurately, the fee shall be retained. On services over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent a (15%) for overhead should exceed the $100 fee Section 3. Subsection (2Xg) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: (g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval of the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative, upon deposit of $750. The fixed service charges for the temporary meter shall be $43.00 per month for one-inch meters, and $85.00 per month for three-inch meters. Charges for the water consumed shall be as stated in Subsection (2)(b) above. Section 4. Subsection (2X) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: 0) All domestic water service installations of sizes 314" to 2", inclusive, consisting of corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and installed by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line, or to a point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or other right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees: 5/8" bypass meter $ 325 3/4" service with meter $2,275 1" service with meter $2,300 l-ll2' service with meter $3,000 2" service with meter $3,200 All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 l1 12 13 t4 l5 t6 t7 l8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the excess shall be refunded. Section 5. Except as expressly amended by this Ordinance, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 1660 shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall go into effect sixty (60) days after its adoption. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of December, 200I, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ _ day of__,200-, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CttETeik C :\FILES\Water\2002fees.pwd.wpd I 2 J 4 ORDINANCE NO. 1676 ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING REVISIONS TO FEES FOR WATER SERVICE The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section l. The existing water rates and connection fees were established by Ordinance No. 1660 adopted July 16,2Wl. Notice of proposed revisions to the connection fees and of the public hearing on the fees was mailed to each property owner in the City and duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The City Council, after public hearing and due study and deliberation, has determined that the cost of installations and testing has increased substantially. The last increase in meter installation fees occurred in 1997 by Ordinance No. 1570. The last increase in flow testing fees occurred in 1983 in Resolution No. 9-83. These fees will better attribute the actual costs of system costs to the persons actually using the services rather to the ratepayers as a whole or to the City in general. In construction and maintenance of the City water system, the City general fund has contributed significant amounts of money to build, maintain, and operate the water system. The fees adopted in this ordinance are not discriminatory or excessive. Section 2. Subsection (2X0 of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: (0 When a flow test is requested by a customer, a fee shall first be paid to the city according to the size of the service as follows: 5/8" through 1" $SO l'112" and2" $80 Over 2" $100 minimum In the event that the meter was recording higher than actual flow, the city shall refund the testing fee and make adjustrnents in the billing for water consumed during the two (2) calendar months preceding the date of the request for a test. In the event the meter was recording accurately, the fee shall be retained. On services over two inches (2"), an additional fee shall be billed if the cost of testing plus fifteen percent 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l l2 l3 t4 15 16 t7 l8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 2 J 4 5 6 7l 8 9 10 ll 12 l3 t4 l5 l6 t7 l8 19 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (15%) for overhead should exceed the $100 fee. Section 3. Subsection Q)G) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: (g) Temporary water service will be provided at a city fire hydrant, after the approval of the location by the city engineer or the engineer's authorized representative, upon deposit of $750. The fixed service charges for the temporary meter shall be $43.00 per month for one-inch meters, and $g5.00 per month for three-inch meters. Charges for the water consumed shall be as stated in Subsection (2)(b) above. Section 4. Subsection (2Xi) of Ordinance No. 1660 is amended to read as follows: 6) All domestic water service installations of sizes 314" to 2", inclusive, consisting of corporation and curb cocks, service line, meter boxes and meters, may be furnished and installed by the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line, or to a point within 4' of the property being served from a water main in an easement, alley or other right-of-way other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main connection to the meter box of sixty fee (60') for the following fixed fees: 5/8" byPass meter $ :ZS 3/4" service with meter $2,275 1" service with meter $2,300 l-112" service with meter $3,000 2" service with meter $3,200 All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer than sixty feet (60') or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and installed by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum to be paid for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such sum shall be deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the event that the estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 1l t2 13 t4 l5 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 installation as hereinabove provided, an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be charged. If the amount deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the excess shall be refunded. Section 5. Except as expressly amended by this Ordinance, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 1660 shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall go into effect sixty (60) days after its adoption. I, ANN T' MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of December, 2001, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_fth day oflqollaql,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHoNY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:NONE ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: NONE C :\FILES\Water\2002fees.pwd. wpd t\ AGENDA 6b STAFF REPORT #ITEM MTG. DATE 1t712 TO:Honorable avor and Council DATE FROM: SIIBJECT:Re ue st for permit to keep three dogs SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a public hearing to determine whether or not Mr. Bill Roper and Ms. Kyle Matthews will be allowed to keep three dogs at the residence. The city ordinance allows no more than two without a permit. DISCUSSION: This issue was received as a code enforcement item on September 17,2001when two neighbors complained that there were three dogs being kept at 1252 Caplchino Ave, a single family residence. Mr. Roper and Ms. Matthews request to permanently keep the three dogs and consider them part of their family Notices of the public hearing were mailed to all properties within 400 feet of the residence. Background information and supporting documents are attached to this report. Affachment Distribution Introduction to 0ur Petition \\'lre1 a prontotir)n at ut-\ (Bill) ur)rk necessitatc-rl a nrrtrc ll'r.rnt [-ttn Beaclt. (.alifbrnia to thc Bar Area. one of our prirnar'l,concenrs *as tinding a house zrnd a neighborhood as thntastic as the one \\e rvere leaving.We searched for six ntonths befbre tinall-v'- finding our lte\\'home at 1252 Captrchino Avenne in Burlingame. The style of the lrome lvas the same as the one \r.'e \\'ere leaving behind and the yard was perfect for our dogs. Additionally. rve immediately f'ell in love u,ith the nlrmerous restaurants and stores on Broadway, all withirr rvalking distance of our house. We were shocked and saddened to learn only after buying our home that the city of Burlingame has an ordinance limiting the number ofdogs that can be kept. To be honest, after searching for a house for so long, if we had known about this ordinance, rve u,ould never had taken a risk and bought our new home. Unfoftunately, after being cited by the city, rve now find ourselves rvith the option of either getting rid of one of our dogs or going tlirough a petition and permit process with the city. Since we desperately do not want to break Llp our farnily. rve have chosen to spend countless hours fulfilling the requirements to present this petition. We have done our best to provide you witlr much more than just the required signatures. Along with all of the perlinent data, we have also given you a look into our home. olrr reasons for owning our dogs and personal letters of reference for both the animals and ourselves. We have also taken the time to provide you with photographs of the environment in which the dogs are cared for as rvell as photos ofBartleby,Loki and Azrael. Finally.rvehavesecuredlettersf}omourveterinariansinregardstothe disposition and breeds of the dogs. Although this ordinance does not concerrr itself r.r,ith the breed of the anirnals in question, we felt it was appropriate and responsible to shorv the City Courrcil that we are dedicated, caring and concerned owners. We were also instructed by the Office of Code Enforcement that rve should inforrn the city of any dates when we will not be available to attend aCity Council rneeting. We are unavailable to attend meetings on November 5'l'.2001 or December 3'd'2001 due to ontstanding business obligations. We want to thank you in advance for taking the tirne and effort to review these rnaterials and we are confident that yon will find us to be not only the type of people who are able to properly care for our pets, but also upstanding new citizens of Burlingame. Respectfully, William D. Roper Ms Matthews 5 Wh"v Do We Have Three Dogs? Tlte're are a f-eu'reasotts uh\ we hal.e three dogs attcl erert tltore rrht te \\nnt to k!-ep therl. Bartlebr. Loki and Azrael are all rescue cases. While the specifics of horv they came to be rvith us are coverecl in their bio-eraphies. the most impoftant aspect of their place in our lives is that u,e provicle a good home for thenr. Tlrey reside itt an atmosphere of loving attentiou arrd rve krrorv tlrat tl-ris is the most essential thing that \rye can give thenr. They' are rvell treated, rvell fed and kept in a safe and comfortable environmetrt. With as ntan)' animals as there are in shelters throughout the cir),and state. we are proud to provide a -eood honre for these animals. They also provide dedicated and loyal companionship. My rvife Ky,le works from home and rvhile I atn at the office, Azrael makes for an excellent friend around tlre lrouse. The difficulties of adjustirrg to both a llew neighborhood and city, as well as rvorking without the social structure of an office, are eased by the proximify of pets. They provide a necessary distraction from the rigors of daily life and the effects of their unconditional affection is something that is difficult to properly express in rvords. I travel frequently for my company and having three larger dogs is an excellent source of home security. Both during the day when my wife Kyle is home alone and during the periods of time rvherr I am away, the dogs are a deterrent to anyone who may have ill or crirninal intentions tor,vards our home or ottr selves. The police commonly state that the best form of home security is a clog, and r,ve have seen tl-re trtrtlr of this olt Inore thatr one occasion wlren suspicious indivicluals have strayecl arvay frotn our yard or door ttpon hearing the dogs bark or seeirrg them over the fence. Ordinance 9.04.040 states, "lt is a public nuisance for any person, firnr or corporation to have. keep or maitttain or cause to be kept or maintained on any premises lvithin the city, rnore than tr.l,o dogs, either male or female of the accepted age of nine months and over." A nuisance. as clefined b1.' the City of Burlingarne, is anything "rvlrich is dangerous, iujurious or a menace to health or safety.. or is indecent or off-ensive to the senses. or is an obstruction to the free use of properly, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyrnent of life or property, or which unlar.vfully obstructs the free passage or use in the customary Inaltner of any stream. or any public park, square, street or highway. or rvhich by anyprovision of this code is specificallydeclaredto be a nuisance;provided, however, nothingwhich is done or maintained under the express authority of law is a nuisance.,, Our dogs have never been cited for excessive barking, darnaging propefty, or for any behavior that collstitutes a physical threat of bodily harm to any person. Their environment is clean and liealthy, they are well fed and tlrey are secrrre in our yard and honre. They do not interfere with the enjoyrnent of our neighbor's life or property and they do rrot obstruct passage to any public facilities. By the defirrition set forth by tlre city, we do not feel that our clogs are in any way a rruisarrce to our rreighborhood or the community at large. Most importantly, rve sirnply do not want to break up our family. We have become incredibly attached to allof our dogs and while we have no intention of getting more, we also desperately do not wan to lose one. We hope that the work we lrave done in securing a large number of signaiures, as well as the effofts put into tlris petition package, are proof that we have time, energy, facilities and love enough to properly support our pets. ' llr Description of Home and Pet Facilities Our resicleuce at l25l Capgchino is a -l bedroom. I bath Tudor sh'le honte u'itlt a detachecl garage that rvas convefied into a studio guesthouse lvith its olvn shou,er and toilet tbcilities. One of tlre ke1 factors for choosilg this horne is the ample lot on rvhich it is located, having not onl.v a grass areas for tlre dogs to play on, but also a sizeable area to the side of the house for the construction and maintenance of a dog run. Since purchasing our home in July. lve have made great efforts to accolnlnodate our neighbors and ourselves by insialling a new 6 foot, 6 inch high fence in the area of the dog rtrn facing the street and bordering our neighbor's propefty. The ferrce is of sturdy red'ivood constrttctiotr rvith 3 feet of the rnain 4x4s sunk into the ground. Additionally, the fence is secured to the coucrete rvalls of our ltouse rvith steel L-brackets. There is no gate from the dog run to the street. Both of our neighbors also have fences on the adjacent properties. Their fences are attached to ottr fence that encloses the dog run. This provides additional assllrance that both our dogs and theirs cannot escape throLrgh this part of the yard. Also, to prevent the dogs frorn digging under the fence. we attached 6 inches of Chicken Wire to the bottorn of the fence. rvhicli is buried beneatlt the grotrnd. TIre fence that borders our backyard is 4 feet, 6 irrches high with a 5-foot high, arched gate. Botli the fence and gate are constructed of redwood and the fence is secttred to the concrete walls of the house with steel L-brackets. All of the planks of the fence have been additionally secured with extra nails and the gate has not onty a deadbolt-style lock that secures the gate into a 4x4 post, but it also has a latch that is secured and padlocked whenever the dogs are in the run. I lrave also personally tested the strength of all of the fences by applying rrry full 6'2",285 lb. frame against them to ensure that they are as stable as possible' We have recently added an odor-prevention system to the dog run to control any issues with smell from animal waste. This has included the tilling of the hard dirt surface and the introduction of a layer of ExStink (a product recommended by the Los Angeles Police and Coroners departrnent for eliminating organic-based odors), 1-2 inches of large riverbed rock, topped by another layer of ExStink. The aeration provided by the porous nature of the rock, the odor-controlling natttre of the compound and the fact that we clean out their run trvice daily sliould provide a very clean environrnent for the dogs. Only Bartleby and Loki utilize the run as Azrael has supervised access to the remairrder of the yard. We also intend to add pig-link fencing to tlre inside of the dog run to prevent possible chewing of the fepce by our dogs. We have not encountered this as an isstte, but we are taking active, preventative measures should they ever exhibit this interest. Finally, the gate to our driveway is over 4 feet high and is secured by both a deadbolt-style lock that secures the gate, but it also has a latch that is secured and padlocked whenever the gate is closed. For both aestlretic and security reasons we intend to replace this gate with a high, wrought-iron gate after the first ofthe year. We understand the irnportance of rnaking sure our dogs are securely in our yard, mainly for the safety and security of our animals. We have no interest or intent for them to be running loose in the streets. While they are not aggressive towards people and we would never expect them to do any harm to a person, we cannot be as sure of what someone may do to them We fully understand the issues surrounding pit-bull type dogs and we have no desire to expose our dogs to anyone without our supervision. We are cognizant and respectful of the feelings of others and we feel it is betterto avoid potentially difficLrlt situations by closely monitoring and controlling or,rr pets. Photographs of Dog Run "?9 { This is the 6'6" fence adjoining the property of our neighbors This is where the 6'6" fence connects to the 4'6" fence leading into our back yard This is the interior of the 6'6" fence that faces the street This is the steel bracketing used to additionally secure the 6'6" fence that faces the street :i .t '*!t .a _ {'pr.:i 'q! .::a{+\ * f,i , i. This is the exterior ofthe 6'6" fence that faces the street This is the steel bracketing and deadbolt on the 4'6" fence that faces the backyard I I I I This is the current state of the dog run, complete with new rock and ExStink treatment , c € i This the Absolute Odor ancl Srnell Rentover. A Teamr,r'ork Presents ETSTINK Page I of2 +o* o,{ a'! "},-ci ssI % mes,TlNlK 100"/0 NATURAL ODORELIMINATOR GUARANTEED ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE NON-TOXIC Satl Us Toll Fr*e! x -s88-s8x -ssss 'n **il$".s7?-1sfififfiClMre ,." 1r what is E'srlNK?h, A porverlirl. 100% nirtLrral, environment li'iendll'. long-lasting cr,vstatlline tniueral that is Guafanteetl f6 eliminate tnajor odors cause b1'': Pet Urine, Sarbage, Vomlt, Smoke' Mildew, Cat Urine, Fish, Freon, Bacterial Decomposition, Hydrogen Sulfide, Formaldehyde, anrl rnsre! . -.rf,I trf wno rvould use E*STINK? Pet or,vners^ Veterinarians. Kennels. Floure C)r.vners. l{otels. f.urpet Nlaiuleuunc'e. .ltruilorierl Scn,ice. Plunttrc.rs. Gy,'nts. Schools. I{ealth Cltibs. llospitals & (llinics. Restattratlts. Rc-al I'lsta[r: Scrvicr.s. (lonvalesccnt.llorncs. Nulsing I[<ltttcs. [tctircnrcrtt Ilotttcs. Watcr'['rcttttrcnt. .lails & polic:e Departrlents. flprgners. I)etail Shops. f'attlenten ancl Fire I)crpartntenls. I{ecotrtntetttlctl lt;r hourc- owu!-rs lvltil havc hacl strrokc clantagc-! :\_l\J where is E'STiNK Used? Pet Areas. Aqualir.rms. Tennis shoes. Kitchens. Latmclry Roours. Hatnpers. Clltrsets. Diaper Pails. Athletic Locliers. []asemcnts. Bird C'ages, C}'imc Scenes. Saf'es. Cars. I]oats. Vans, RV's. Garbagc Birrs & Contpactors. Scnagc. (lafetcriers. (looking Oclors. I)rains. l,clungcs. Beclcling. Reli.igerators & Freezers. Slorage Rtloms. Shoes. Decal,ing mu11er - plant ot'tltlinutl. or ztll-t' plitcc thcre ma5,' bc att nnpleasaut oclor! Irollorv these links fbr rnore intrornlation atrd orcleringl http ://www.exstink.com/r012912001 Customer Testintonial Page 1 of4 -Lo.7, d* r) +Yrv s I mtrsT[IqK 1OO% NATURAL ODOR E,LIMINATOR GUARANTEED ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE NON.TOXIG What Customers Say About t:l'S"l'!NE( January 19,2000 I was using i ' i l irr f'. on the carpets for cat urine, and a week later. after vacuuming, I noticed that the mattecl-pile on the25 year old calpet had n-rysteriously revived. I then applied ExStink to the other traffic ar"ar, to see if this was really happening. And it is. Tliis is a wonderful product. Arro I Lund hpl anet,'rltheglid' net April S, 2001 I had used ExSTINK before to get the smell of decaying meat out of afreezet that broke two weeks before I discovered it and was very satisfied. Later that year, some gasoline for the mower spilled in the trunk of the car. I cleaned up as much of it with paper towels as I could but the smell oigasoline lingered. Then I remembered the ExSTINK. I knew that it wasn't recommended for ur. o1 those t<inas of smells but I figured what did I have to lose. I first sprinkled ExSTINK all over the carpeted area affected and put a pan of ExSTINK in the trunk and waited. After about two days the smell was practically gone. I vacuumed the carpet and applied ExSTINK to the carpet again and another pan full. Within a couple more days the srnell was gone. My neighbor had the same kind of accident and I gave him some ExSTINK and it worked for hirn too. Yott folks rnight not recommend it for gasoline smells but it sure worked for me. Thanks Michael Uniontown, PA January 30,2001 ExSTINK is a wonderful product. I used it in my children's room and the odors weere gone. I will recommend this to anyone who needs to remove odors out of anything. It's wonderful. Tammy Carney Glendora, Ca. July 2000 To Anyone considering using an ExStink product: I work on dairy farms around the region. When I get home, my clothes smell like the cows I have been around. No amount of detergent, fabric softeners, dryer sheets, or odor eliminators could completely get rid of the smell, and if a "non-cow" item was washed with my clothes by mistake, the smell was transferred. I was skeptical, but figured I had nothing to lose by buying two two-pound containers of ExStink powder. The first time I used it I put about 1/4 cup in the washing hfin.//rxnrnrr ewcfink nnrn/errstnmer hfm'l 10t2912001 Custonler Testimor-rial Pagc' 2 of 4 machine and did not add anything other than rletergent. I n'as elated to find absolutely no trace of corv odor rvhen the laundrl' rvas done! Once, just hours before a famill' bunch, my dog had terrible diarrhea all over ih. Iining room rug. After the usual cleanup, I sprinkled - gx"Stint< on the spots and rubbed it in rvith a brush. I then cleaned that up and there lvas NO SMELL LEFTI i u- ,ro*o a lifelong user and hope that you will give the product a chance to change your life too. Sue Bentley, Connecticut September 2000 Norv please send the 8 lb. pait. It really rvorks on Cat Urine. Joanne Koenig, Nerv York. Dear ICS, L2fift998 I am rvriting to tell you horv pleased rve are about your Extink product. Of all the products and Home iemidies we used ,Exstink was the one that did the trick.Getting rid of the Cat Urine smell was a great Triumph. Even our garage is odor free ! We are truly amazed horv it just destroys the olor,and We are very happy tha! there is such a product - Thanks to the internet we found you. Thank you , "James W. Piliero, Exmore, Va". " I have a 25' Sportfisher with a 300 qt. fish hold on board. I always have trouble with odors even after washing with straight simple green. The odors will wash away but return in a week. I tried putting an 1/8 cup of i,:'S'I'i\il in the fish hold & to my amazement it removed all odors. I am still using the same 1/8 cup I started with 6 months ago " Mike of Chinon Ca.. "For the past six months we have used your product, I','S'f lNni which has been very successfui in helping us eliminate odors in both the jail and the property room which range from perspiration to vomit. Thank you for introducing us to l'l'S'l trN K and we will continue to use the product within our facility." Torrance POLICE DEPT., Lt. Michael Tamble' Commander. "As an executive in the hotel industry, I have used every odor eliminator there is - from ozone machineso sprays, enzymes, and a host of others that have come, gone and remain. We'll stick with I,.'S'I'!N K." COURTYARD by MARRIOTT, Century City, CA. Sonny Jafie'ir, Gen. Mgr. ' "As fleet service manager for Hertz, I run into many nasty odors ranging from mildew, spills per smells, vomit, cigarette smoke and even dead animals. E'S'l-ii\iK is the best product we've found to eliminate all these odors." HERTZ CORP., San Jose, CA. Frank Lawrence, Service Mgr. "We had a week of nothing but rain and it was so damp in the house that our fireplace made the first floor smell like damp burnt wood...but I didn't think much about it since I spend most of my time upstairs in my office. One night in particular,I had company and everyone was playing with my dog and we all kind of lost track of time and the dog had an accident on the floor in the family room...no big deal...I have plenty of I'-'5'l'l N trr. on hand for such situations...so I cleaned it up. Sprinkled some E\S'I'INK on it and let it go and forgot all about it. The next day when I got up and went downstairs to have my morning coffee. It caught my attention that as I got to the bottom of the stairs, I didn't smell any more damp burnt wood...then I remember the ErSTINK...it not only took care of the accident my dog had but it took the fireplace smell out of the house as well!. is the best product we've found httn : //www. exstink. com/customer. html 1012912001 Customer Testimonial Page 3 of4 to eliminate all these o(lors." ., OHIO. ,,I c:ln non. 'GUARANTEE' to remove the kincls of odors I thought irnpossible betbre." JANSSEN'S (Since 1939) Glendale, cA. Ralph Grecco, o$'ner. "Although I have shelves futl of odor eliminators and deodorizers in my store. I recommend L':i-f l\K because it simply u,orks better than all of the others put together-" AAA DYE & CHEMICAL CO. Torrance, CA. Donald David, Orvner' " One of our customers called complaining about a bad smell coming from under their house. The smell was so bad that it rvas starting to make them sick. We suspected a broken sewer line. It turned out to be a very big dead opossum. The smell was so bad, my man could not get close enough to it to remove. We decided to take a dust mask & try rubbing some il'$"t'lN tr on the outside of it. We did, & could not smell any odor through the mask from the carcass when he lvent back under the house. The entire house & its air system stunk bad. We took 6 lb. of E;.'S t'l:*{!(, spread around under the house & under the FAU. Turned the blower on & within 30 minutes the odors were gone. D & R Plumbing,Inc.. Covina, Ca.&. "I am often asked if I know of a product which is effective in eliminating the odors of bacterial decomposition. We recommend Exstink." LOS ANGELES CORONERS'S OFFICE. Los Angeles, CA. Crag R. Harvey. " I had some relatives over one night and they are chain smokers...by the time they had left, the house was so smoky that I could hardly breathe. I had to open windows just to air out some of the smoke. Before I went to bed, I sprinkled a little II\STINK, around on the carpet and by morning you would have never known I had chain smokers in my house just the night -before!! The stuff works and it never ceases to amaze me!!! DEBRA, Cincinnati, Ohio. "After a cat died in my new Cadillac. I tried everything to remove the odors. I was preparing to reupholster the entire vehicle when I learned about I','ii i'*"t1".. It took two applications. But the odors were 100o/o gone in two days -- and never came back! That 2 Ib. boitle was the best $10.00 I ever spent! I think you're selling it too cheep." TOM RUUD, Santa Ana, CA. Toll Free 1 -888-881 -0898 {909} 877-t 9?6 F'ollow these links {on lnore inf,orrmaatiom ax}{tr orderirag! eliminatingothing Thibodea -9K tsulllodorsournksworatbetter"N pet aNte MotorCA.Los UX,TransportPOLISDEPTCEAngeles,ELEANG Division. http : //www. exstink. com/customer. html 1012912001 Daily Location Schedule To address any concerns regarding the location of our dogs during any given time of the dav. the follorving is a list of u'here the dogs are kept at all times and under what conditions: Azrael is in the house at all times, except when she is in the backyard under supervision. She is not allowed access to the dog run. Bartleby and Loki are in the side yard ONLY WHEN someone is home. Given that Kyle works at home, the dogs will be in the dog run while she is working. The dogs are allowed in the backyard only under supervision. a a a o Bartleby and Loki are in the back house during all general absences by both Bill and Kyle. They are also in the back house at night. All dogs will be professionally kenneled during overnight or longer absences frorn the house. Complaints to Animal Control/Burlingame PD 11 the short time rve have lived in Burlingame. we have had lnore encollnters rvith the police and animal control than at any other point in our lives. We felt it was important to udd.6r this issue proactively so that the City Council would have a full understanding of the circumstances surrounding these visits. July 2,2001 General Call At 8:00 a.m., two officers visited us from the Burlingame Police Department. While no official "complaint" had been registered, they mentioned that they had been informed that we owned three "pit bulls" and that we were one dog over the city's dog ordinance. They said this wouldn't be an issue as long as the dogs stayed in the yard and didn't create a constant disturbance. July 3,2001 Dogs Loose On our third day in the house, two of our three dogs broke out of the side yard. Burlingame Police responded and, after telling them to "go home", the dogs went back into the yard. We attempted to have the fence replaced prior to gaining possession of the house. but met with no success. Following the initial escape, the dogs were kenneled until a new fence could be constructed. This occurred within two weeks of their escape. There have been no additional escapes since the fence was replaced. September 12,2001 Doe Fieht We are aware that two calls were made to Animal Control to repofi dogs fighting. We were on our honeymoon at the tirne and were having someone "stay" with the dogs (we found out that this did NOT happen, despite assurances that this would occur in our absence). The officer responding (Officer Dumanden) reported to us that he saw no immediate safety concerns for either the dogs or the community. We can only surmise what occurred between the dogs. Azrael had been separated from Bartleby and Loki for approximately three weeks due to an injury. Our veterinarian was concerned that she would reopen a cut she had on her foreleg as a result of playing with the other dogs. Following the removal of her sutures and permission from the vet, our housesitter reintroduced her to the dog run. From all accotults. the tighting sctuttdecl horrible. Dr'spite thc noise. thr, tjght \\ils l.r() nhere near AS bad as it sounded. Azrael looked the u'orse fbr n'ear. but sLrstainecl injulrc-s that rvere indicative of a dominance fight lbite marks on and around her neck). She hacl to have her original injur: re-sutnred, and the vet stitched up several small bites as a precautionary measure. Neither of the other dogs required medical attention. The dogs are now only allowed together when they are supervised by BOTH of us. Given Azrael's nature, we were not at all surprised to learn that Loki had decided to take charge. Azrael's habits of bone-stealing and dominance play had finally come to an end. We have allowed the dogs to come together on a couple of occasions, and it is qr-rite clear that Azrael has learned a valuable lesson. She immediately subrnits and we have seen no furlher sign of aggression between the dogs. As a result of this event, we will be professionally kenneling all three dogs during any overnight absence. September 25,2001 A Complaint A complaint was called in regarding our fence. While the officer responding (Officer Dinneen) didn't see any problem with the fence, she did recommend that the fence be better secured by bracketing it to the house. This was done within 48 hours of the call. Kyle Lynn Matthews A Brief Biography I rvanted to take this opportunity to tell the City a bit about myself. My resume is too long and only reflects my professional life. I am a California native. being born in La Jolla, California. I Iived in the San Diego area for the t-lrst 34 years of my Iife. While in San Diego, I attended San Diego State University for rny undergraduate degree in Clinical Psychology (8.A. in Psychology, 1986), and received my subsequentgraduate degree in Counseling Psychology from National University (M.A., Counseling Psycholgy, 1995). I moved to Glendale, CA, in 1998 to pursue a career opportunity. Professionally. I have had two separate careers. I worked for I3 years in retail and retail management. In that tirne, I spent seven years working for Bullocks/Bullocks Wilshire (currently knor,vn as Macy's), and my final three years were spent in rnanagement positions rvith The Disney Stores, Inc. I began working in the field of higher education as a result of my graduate work in 1993. I have served as an educational evaluation officer, transfer specialist, manager of continuing education programs, and an afticulation consultant. My most recent...and rewarding...position was in the role as Coordinator for Transfer Admission at Woodbury University in Burbank, CA. In that role, I served as the university's representative for transfer students coming from area community colleges. In addition, I served as the university's Arliculation Officer, being responsible for the development and tnaintenance of transfer contracts between WoodbLrry University and community colleges. I continue to do this work frorn rny current home in Burlingame. Personally, I spend my free time reading, acting, and caring for my horne, my new husband, and my pets. I arn also a news junkie. We lrave no children, altlrough I consider my present family to be a loving and cornplete one. While we have many friends in the Bay Area, I am still adjLrsting to my new surroundings. I plan on continuing my work from home, and may utilize my expeftise in the area of educational counseling to serve individuals in tlre community who are in need of guidance in tlreir pursuit of higher education. I have orvned pets allof my life. While t have been in situations (two) where one of rny beloved pets had to be given up, they were given to the right people...my parents. I love my pets and all anirnals in ways I cannot pttt to words, up to and including my insistence on a "capture and release plan" for most errant insects in rny horne (fleas and ticks DON'T count). To give Llp one of my dogs would break my heaft, as I made a commitment to each of them upon their adoption. To break such a commitment due to an ordinance, not an act of violence, neglect, or nuisance on behalf of rnyself OR my pets, seems unfair and unjust. Given that other families in Burlingame exceed the "dog limit," I would hate to see their families broken up in order to comply with this ordinance, particularly if the farnilies have done nothing to infringe upon the comrnunity at large. I consider our pets members of our family. Within our family we have rules and regulations we mLlst follow. Animal companions are not exempt from these rules, which include obedience, politeness, and openness to friends and strangers alike. If these rules are violated, we are fully aware of our responsibility in handling any repercussions from damaging or violent acts by our dogs. We knew that when we took these dogs in that their lives would be free from a lifetime of neglect and violence. Only by allowing them to remain witlr us can we guarantee them this. Should we be in the position to have to give up one of our dogs, we will have broken that commitrnent. I, for one, am hopeful that we won't be met with this outcome. Witliam David Roper A Brief Biograph,v I rvanted to take this opportunity to tell the Citl, sornething about myself. My resume onl1.' reflects m1, professional eristence and does not hold essential details regarding rnv private life. I am a California native, being born in Concord, California. I Iived in the East Bay Area until the age of 20. rvhen I transferred to California State University, Long Beach. While there, I worked torvards an undergraduate degree in Commercial Music rvith an emphasis in Vocal Perfonnance. While I did not complete my B.A. degree program in order to pursue professional musical interests, I remained in close contact with the school and the community, choosing to stay in Long Beach for over 15 years. I moved to Burlingame, CA, in July of 2001 to accept a promotion and greater responsibility within rny company, Blizzar d Entertainment. Professionally, I have been witlt Blizzard Entertainment for a little over 7 years. As Senior Director of Developer Relations, I am responsible for overseeing and managirrg all external projects. as r.vell as coordinating internal developrnent teams and heading Blizzard's project oversiglrt tearns. I have rvorked directly as a producer or designer on all of Blizzard's top-selling products and have also been instrurnental in providing Blizzard's voice content, both acting in and assisting in the direction of the voice recording for the ll/arcraft, Diablo. and StarCraft franchises. I am also the rnain representative for the company r.r,ith specialty and mainstrearn press, both nationally and internationally. Pelsonally, I spend my free time reading, singing, playing computer games and caring for our home. and lavishing atl-ections on n1y new rvife and our pets. I am also an avid sports fan, witli a long-time love for the Giants and 49ers that earned ffre lrore than my share of grief from my Southern California friends. While we have many friends (and my fathef in the Bay Area, leaving the great network of friends in Long beach has taken some adjustrnent. Foftunately, rny work has become more challenging and I now live mr:clr closer to the office so I can, at the same time, spend more time with my wife. I have always been in a home with dogs. Growing up, my parents considered it to be essential to my learning the lesson of responsibility. After finally moving into a house in Long Beach where I could once again have pets, I took in two stray dogs that ended up moving out of state witlr a former girlfriend. Wlren the opporlunity arose to fill the first home I had purchased with the Ioyal comparrionship and protection offered by dogs, Ijurnped at it - and forlunately rny wife Kyle agreed tlrat they would be a wortlry addition to our home. We know of others within the city with more thau two dogs but yet have not had to undergo the process of acquiring a permit. In fact, representatives of both the Office of the City Attorney Code Enforcement Bureau and the City Clerk have infbrmed us that they coLrld find record of only one case of a petition being cornpleted in regards to this ordinance. The perrnit was granted. We have made a strong commitrnent to our pets and I hope that the obvious alnollnt of work and care that has gone into this petition is proof positive that we look forward to maintaining a happy home for a long time. Azrael Aztael came to live with us in July of 2000 at approximately three months of age. Duringa trip to the neighborhood Petco, we came across a young woman whose boyfriend hadfound an abandoned puppy in downtown Los angeles. The dog was very thin andCOVERED with fleas and ticks. The young woman, although ,iell intentioned, wasclearly unfamiliar with dogs (she owned snakes). Given that we had the accommodationsand the resources to care for the puppy, we took her home, cleaned her up, and saw toimmediate veterinary care for her. She appears to be a Rhodesian Ridgeback mix, although we cannot say for sure. Sheweighs approximately 70lbs. She was spayed at 6 montf,s of age, is cu'ent on all of hershots, and is licensed and micro-chipped. She has become our,rhouse dog,, and has takento her new sulroundings quite nicely. She is even-tempered and very f;r;iy. Constantattention has mellowed her, although she still maintains a significant amount of puppyenergy. Her interaction with other animals is one of friendliness and an overwhelming desire to Pluy"'constantly. While she is obedient MOST of the time, she can be stubborn. She willbe attending her first obedience training after the first of the year. I {{ t * I Bartleby and Loki Bartleby and Loki came to live with us in July of 2000. They were eleven weeks old at the time. They were pafi of a litter of six; their mother was a mixed breed. After a lengthy adoption interview, we were permitted to take the puppies in. We were both aware of their "pit-type" Iineage (although they are mixed breeds) and kn.* that we could afford them the opportunity to be raised with affection and kindness. In addition, we knew that we had also eliminated the possibility of their being raised as fighting animals as we both abhor the practice of fighting dogs. Bartleby weighs approximately 115 lbs. (and yes, he is on a diet). Although his size isintimidating...he is a muscular dog...he is quite shy. In fact, he would rather run from strangers than be required to even walk past them. For a dog so large, he is can be quite a coward. And we love him for his never-ending goofiness. Bartleby has some trouble with basic obedience; he isn't very bright and his enthusiasm can get the better of him. In contrast, Loki weighs approximately 80 lbs. and loves everyone. She is very mild- mannered and loves attention. She is our "alpha" dog, meaning she rules the roost when itcomes to our other dogs. She is very obedient and follows commands well. Her worst transgression has been the eating of my futon. Bartleby and Loki were spayed/neutered at six months of age, are current on all required shots, and are both licensed and micro-chipped. Both Bartleby and Loki will be ,...irirgobedience training after the first of the year. I I ?, '. Peninsula Humane Society i2 Airport Blr.d, San N{ateo, CA 9.1.101 (650) 340-8200 (650) 318_7891 FAX Receipt Number: R01 -039212 Person lnformation: WILLIAM ROPER 1252 CAPUCHINO AV BURLINGAIUE, CA 94010 Receipt Date: Saturday, September Zg,20A1 PID: P166874 Item Animal lD Reference No:Price: Each Amount: LIC TRUST 3 LIC TRUST 3 LIC TRUST 3 LIC SN 3 LIC SN 3 LIC SN 3 4207686 p 07687 42O768B A,207686 p.207687 4207688 101-D29876 LO1-D29877 LO1.D29878 101 -D29876 LO1-D29877 L01 -D29878 $3.00 3.00 3.00 27.0A 27.00 27.00 Total Fees Due: Payments: Cash: Check: Credit Card: 1 1 1 "1 1 1 $3.00 3.00 3.00 27.O0 27.O0 27.00 $90.00 $0.00 $0.00 $90.00 Total Payments Receiv"a, ffi Thank You! Change: $0.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Animal lnformation A207686 BARTLEBY - NEUTERED, PIT BULUBOXER, BL BRINDLE DOG 4207687 LOKI - SPAYED, PIT BULUBOXER, BL BRINDLE DOG 4207688 AZRAEL . SPAYED, RHOD RIDGEBACI(MIX, YELLOW DOG License lnformatian: Tag Number:Expires: Animal# Vacc Date:Term: Expires:Amount:Type: D29876 D29877 D29878 D29876 D29877 D29878 09t01t04 09t01t04 09t0'U04 09t01t04 09/01t04 09t01t04 A207686 A,.07687 A207688 4207686 p2O7687 A207688 09t28t01 09128t01 09110t01 09t28t01 09t28t01 09t10t01 09128t04 09t28t04 09t10t04 09t28t04 09t28t04 09t10t04 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $27.00 $27.00 $27.00 LIC TRUST 3 LIC TRUST 3 LIC TRUST 3 LIC SN 3 LIC SN 3 LIC SN 3 36 36 36 36 JO 36 Total License Fees: $90.00 Shelter Hours Monday - Friday 9:00AM - 6:00pM* Saturday 9:00AM _ 5:00pM* Shelters CLOSED Sundays and Holidays Transaction Date: 09/29/01 print Date: Ogt2gl}l)lerk: DGENSEL SHELTER receipt.rpt ss 12100 BAYSHORE AI\IMAL HOSPTTAL 1.1.) \,,rri; \,;;11rlr1r,tl il,,ri!,.i.ir,i . l:irt \i:it-,,.r \.rllrri " rr,.rt ir ll--lr):j October ?5,lOAL To Whom It liAoy Concern: 'Loki" ond'Bortleby" Roper are oPProximotelyl5-month old mixed breed Puppies. Bosed on oppeoroncethey ore presumed to be Pif Bull crosses. The Ropers brought the puppies to Boyshore Animol Hospital on SePtember ?8, ?OOL, for vaccinotions and general physicol examinotions. During their visit, both dogs were found to be heolthy ond did not exhibit aggressive behavior towords PeoPle or other dogs. f consulted with Mr. Roper regording the behovior of the dogs and the previous oltercotion between "Loki" ond their third dog 'Az?ael". Mr. Roper reported that the puppies ore now kept separoted from'Az?ael", he hos contocted an onimal behaviorist ond plons to enroll the pups in troining closses. The fomily seems to be toking o very reosonoble ond responsible opprooch to prevent further problems between'Azrdel and 'Loki". Providing they follow through with the obove plon, it is my opinion they con continue to mointoin o comfortoble family structure with oll three dogs. Sincerely, -1 f,autt 12 Koren B. Conroy, D .,vl Jes E-nrail: tllnr@,balr,ispilal.r.onr . \\elrsite: rrrr n.bahospital.<.onr BAYSHORE AI\IMAL HOSPITAL :.i l \,,.1i!i \r;r1,i,i,'ti l:i,,rr1,',..rr',1 ' l.rn \iritr,'. {. \'jl.ltli * rrr.r{ii.i1: ;it:- October 24,2041 To Whom It May Concern: ..Azrael" Roper is a l4-month old spayed female mixed breed dog (appears to be predominantly Rhodesian Ridgeback) who presented to Bayshore Animal Hospital on September I l, 2000 with multiple superficial bite wounds. The owner believed these wounds had been inflicted by the other dogs in the household, and there was a previous history of injuries suspected to be bite wounds on August 27 , 2AOO. The owner stated at the time of presentation that "Azrael" was current on all vaccinations. Apart tom her wounds, "Anael" appeared healthy on physical examination. She was cooperative throughout her examination and tolerated mildly painful procedures (such as the drawing of blood samples) without resistance. At no time during her stay in the hospital did Azrael demonstrate any aggressive behavior towards people or other animals. Her bite wounds were treated with surgical debridement and lavage, a drain was placed, and "Azrael" was placed on oral antibiotics. Her wounds healed well with only minor complications (seroma formation) at one site. ,,A7nael" was last seen at Bayshore Animal Hospital on September 25,2000. Based on this brief contact with "Azrael," I do not believe she presents a risk ofdisease or injury to people or other dogs. However, I have recommended that she and the other dogs in the household be separated due to the risk to her ofadditional aggressive incidents and potential injury. Sincerely, fr ?;?t '/x'Az t.ta. // " a Brennen McKenzie, M. jes E-nrail: ,lr':l@ lialr,rslrilirl.r.orrr . \\i.lisrte: *wu.bah,rspilal.r.,rlrr m I arn u'nung this letter on belmlf of K1,le Matthe*'s and Bill Roper. Bill and I have been close friends for l5 r,ears and I knorv him to be a responsible. honest and cornpassionate person. I also knou him to be a responsible pet o\\,ner. Bill took excellent care of Spark-v and Friendo - nvo dogs he owned several vears ago - with regular visits to the vet. the groomers and the dog park Since they acquired their current pets (Bartleby. l,oki and Azreal), Bill and Kyle have likewise taken excellent care of them. In fact, they even remodeled the backyard of their home in Long Beach to ensue that the three young dogs had plenty of room to exercise. To my knowledge, none of their neighbors in Long Beach ever had any complaints about the dogs or the way that Bill and Kyle treated them. My fiancde, Paula Robbe, and I took care of Azreal for a week when they first rescued her and our impression of her is that she was a healthy and happy animal. Paula and I spent a great deal of time at Bill and Kyle's Long Beach home, even house sitting and caring for their dogs and cats on occasion. All of their pets seem friendly and well adjusted and they are definitely well maintained and loved. I feel confident that Bill and Kyle can maintain their dogs as lovingly and responsibly in Burlingame as they did in Long Beach. If there are any further questions on this subject, I encourage any interested parties to contact me. Thank you. Kurt Peterson 906 Molino Ave. Long Beach CA 9080.1 {s62) 439 909e kpbball@earthlink. net To Whom It May Concern: I wanted to echo Kurt's sentiments about they way Bill and Kyle treat their pets. I have known both of them for about three years and in the time that they have had their three dogs, they have always struck me as both concemed for the well-being of both their animals and also of anyone who comes in contact with them. As a fellow pet owner (one dog and two cats), I pronounce them quality parents! Thanks for listening Paula Robbe 906 Molino Ave. Long Beach CA 90804 (s62) 243 6938 prhealinghands@earthlink. net .lason Rodgers -lj-l East Third Streer Long Beach Califbrnia 562-195-2029 To whom it may concern. I have had the opportunily to house sit for Bill Roper on many occasions when he. his wife and their three dogs lived in Long Beach. California. It u,as a pleasure to look after the dogs and I often spent a lot of time playing rvith them in the backyard. While their size may be intimidating to some I found the dogs quite manageable and playful. In fact the largest of them (the male) is the most playful and least aggressive, sometimes bordering on shy around strangers. Judging a dog simply by its appearance and the sound of its bark is seldom any indication of its disposition. Bill and Kyle are caring, attentive owners and that love shows in their pets. I am not arvare of any incidents involving their dogs and anyone's person or propefiy. I was present on tlte day they first received the dogs. and was closelv involved with them Lrp to when they moved to the Bay Area. A dog is only dangerous in the hands of a bad owner. I rvas thrilled to see these dogs go to such gentle and caring people. I would be surprised if these animals ever intentionally injured anyone; short of believing they were lap dogs and crushing one's legs with their girth. Jason Rodgers 12747 Oxnard Street North Holl1,u,ood. Ca 91606 I Ruth Delgado have on many occasionstaken care of Kyle Matthervs' and Bill Ropers,dogs, Bartleby, Loki and Azrael , while Kyle and Bill aie out of the country on business. Every single occasion with the dogs has been a highly enjoyable and playful one. AII dogsare extremely energetic and friendly. They are very well-bihaved and aie quick learners. To Whom It May Concern: said, it is understandable that their size and appearance may be intimidating to ls definitely misconception.Specifically,Bart and Loki should not be helda for the way they Iook therefore,their appearance should not be the decid lngcapacity to perform as wonderful and loving pets to their owners and friends. YOU, D,fu Ruth Georgina Delgado Woodbury University RD aaaaaaaaaaa.aaa From: Joe Morrissey 1167 Burrows San Francisco, CA. 94134 (415) 334-0170 To Whom It May Concern: I've known Bill and Kyle Roper for only a short time now, but I can say without a doubt that they are care, concerned, and responsible individuals. They've always gone out of their way to make us feel at home whenever we visit them. Their dogs are exactly the same way, always caring and playful. I was lucky enough to do-e sit for them a couple of months ago. Spending time with their dogs was very enjoyable. Never once was I worried for my safety or for the safety of any other people I had over while I was watching the pets. In fact, many times I found myself rolling around on the ground playing with them. Bill and Kyle have gone out of their way to make sure the dogs are well taken care of. I have two dogs of my own and I hope that if I ever need someone to watch them, that they will be available to do so. They care so much for these dogs that you would think they were their own children. Please allow them to keep the dogs. With the amount of care and consideration that the Roper's have put into these dogs and protecting the neighbors, I can think of no good reason why they shouldn't be able to stay together as a family. Thanks you. Sincerely, Joe Morrissey October 23,2001 Maya Marie Rodgers To whom it may concem, I am writing to you on behalf of three dogs, Bartleby, Loki, and Azraelthat wish to staytogether with their parents. It has come to my attention via the dogs' parents, Bill andKyle Roper that the dog's fate may be in jeopardy. I have known the Ropers for a few years and I have known the dogs since they wereacquired. In fact, I meet them on their first day in their new home.lhe time I have spentwith all three of the dogs has led me to the conclusion that they are three of the sweetest and well loved animals that I know of. I have never been scratched, growled at, or even barked at by any ofthe dogs. They arenot dangerous and are not in any danger. The dogs are actuaily quite shy ani don,t evencome near you until they are comfortable. Bill and Kyle Ropel,are very good parents to the dogs. They make sure that they arehoused; they eat well and have watir every day. I hive seen on numerous occasions thesigns of love and affection that only truly good pur.rrts can give. They play with theirdogs; give them hugs and kisses, and treati when they are good. I hope this letter gives you some insight on the Ropers and their wonderful dogs. It wouldbe very sad if this family were broken up. Very Truly Yours, Stuart & Luz Venatrle 75210 Weeks Drive La Miracla, CA 90638 (562) e02-e362 Wednesday, Octobe r 24, 200j. Stuart &.LuzVenable To Whom It May Concern: we are sencling this letter_in regard to Bill Roper & Kyle Mathews, dogs. Bill hasinformed us that some of his neighbors ur" .o.r."rned because of the breed oftwo of their pets. I would like to state that Bill & Kyle take the responsibility of their pets veryseriously' They h1y9 gone to great measures to ensure that their animals are wellsocialized and well behaved. Having visited Bill & Kyle's resiclence in Long Beach and Burlingame, we have f1a nulerous oPPortunities to interact with ihese animals, a.,dihey neverbehaved in anything b"!a friendly manner. The animals are neither threateningnor dangerous' In fact, the only danger in dealing with these animals is the slightchance of drowning in dog saliva. I would strongly -"-".oYlg" any governing body to consider whatever measuresare necessary to allow Bilr & Kyre to keep these animars together, as I trurybelieve they are not a nuisanceto the neighbors or the commtmity in general. Thank you for your time, October 29. l00l Re: Petition of Bill Roper. K1'le N4attheu's. Barrlebl'. Loki. and Azrael To Whom it May Concern: I am writing this letter in support of the petition of Bill Roper and Kyle Matthews to be allorved to keep a third dog. I am a co-worker of Bill and friends of both Bill and his rvife. I have spent time over his house and interacted with his dogs. The-v are all great dogs and Bill and Kyle take great care of them. Bill and Ky,le r,vould be heartbroken if they were forced to lose one of their children. In order to keep the dogs safe, they have taken steps to ensure that their backyard is secure by putting in new fencing. They are also improving the dog run to be free from odor with new rock and odor absorbing material. These kind of improvements are costly and show what kind of committed and caring owners Bill and Kyle are. Sincerely. Kenneth Williarns rllt /l October'29. l00l To Whom It Mrry Concem: I am writing in reference to the situation faced by Bill Roper and Kyle Matthews. I have known them for many years, and kno.w that they are responsible, courteous, and safe dog- owners. They are very conscientious of their neighbors, and go to great.lengths to ensure that their dogs pose no threat to anyone. They do this even though the dogs, in my opinion, are not dangerous. They have company frequently at their house, and the dogs are well socialized. I am also a dog owner, and know that the character of the owners determines the character of the dogs. Bill and Kyle are ideal in this respect, and well equipped to handle their three lovable dogs. When good people have good dogs, the dogs become paft of the family. Please allow this family to stay together. Thanks, Max Schaefer Burlinganre cin council My natne is Matt Cadwallader and I am writing this letter in sLrpport of Bill Roper and Kyle Matthews as fit and able caretakers of their pets. I worked for Wildlife Fish and Game in and around the Angeles National Forest and outlying suburbs to provided assistance in animal rescue, physical rehabilitation, and quarantine services for wildlite and stray or abandoned domestic animals. I have taken care of destructive, neglected or dangerous animals in the past, and I can say with out any fear of contradiction that the Roper's pets are fit, healthy and happy. They do not show dangerous destructive tendencies or aggression, and are no danger to any property or community members. The dogs are well cared for, well loved. and thoroughly happy and fit. Bill and Kyle love these dogs and deserve to keep them in their horne. Thank you, Matt Cadwallader 13845 Friar St. Van Nuys, CA 91404 (8r 8) 781-54i5 T o: 1urlinqame CiLy Council Ke:The ordinance on the number of doqe allowed per family, and opecifically,thoee daqo belonqinq lo one 1ill Roper My name ie Srian Mansfield, and I am a friend of Mr. Ropere and have visited him a number of timee. I am not, eure how many complainLe are needed ta reach the'numeroua comVlaints' the city alleqedly received reqardin7 Mr. Ropero Veto, buf,l find that unusual. Hio peNo have alwaye been f,he calmest, and moet, eubmiosive animale I have ever eeen and have only heard a bark come oul of play, My 6ueee ie lheee complainto came from one or lwo opecific neiqhbore who, for oome reaeon, juelflat ouL don'Nlikethese animale and are quickto complain. I am nol oayinqihey did not make noisoe;in facl,they may have made some noioe oul of lonlinees forlheir family, or perhapo l,hey cauqhl, a rat, or blrd in a f,ree and could nol ba quief,ed,, bul a'nuioance' io oomelhinq I don'l see theoe animals ao being. I think it would be a terrible to ehame to break up thio family, people and pete alike. Mr. Ropero ?ef,o 1el, alonq quile well and it is obviouo lhey love their ownero, I would be dieappoinlinq to aee thio city ordinance from 1941 enforced, ae it, not, only breako up a qreat family, but, I believe il, to be out-dated ao well. Ao lonq as ?etrt are ?ro?erly cared for and not a bother,l believe Lhere ahould be no limitfor a tamily, and action ehould only betaken if a Vroblem pereiete. I ao eVeak ao an animal owner myoelf , and my two doqo became very noioy on Lhe laot ni1hl of our firsL vacation away from Nhem, and yee, we did receive complainto for out neiqhbore. Since then, we have remedied the eituation and they have nol,l,roubled our nei1hbore eince, even when we are qone for an extended Veriod. I think a reaeonable solution aloo exiele for the RoVer family oo f,hat hio nel7hboro will not be bolhered aqain, and a family can remaln to1ether. Thankyou, 9rian Vansfield I Erecutive Summary of Petition Data rn acrcritiou to the pages rlf sisnatures rve hAr,c- coilectecr. *e rra'e arso iuclude(l doc,rlrelrtati.' ..rl tltc effbr-ts irvolr,ed in securingthese,anres. wrrir",hir,luto is brokerr clo*'u in a, easill reaclaLrle tort.at- rr,e also felt it rvas i,.l-lporaur"t r" provicle a s,rlmar)'of rvhat these ttumbers fepresellt' I' securing signatures form the rnajority of the resiclents rvithin 400 feet surrounding our horne' rve found there rvere three basic r;-*pes orr..ia.n..sl Single Family Honres. Non-Secured Apartments and Secttred APartments' Single Family Homes are houses or noll-secured condominiurns where the residents/orvrers rvere easily approached il;ir;";-of dwellings comprise approxirnately 27 percent of the residences rvithin 400 feet of our property' Non-secured Apartments are those where the reside.ts/owners were easily approacl,ed' These types of dwellings comprise approximat ely 39i"t"tn'of the residences within 400 feet of our property' Secured Apartments are apartments, condominiums or gated complexes where the residents/orvners are not reaclily u.".r.iil". th"." urirai'g11"'';iiy l'*"\o .Soliciiing signs posted' and all of thent have locked entryways. It was extremiy aifficult for us to gain 'lgnitutit from these types of residences ancl the extremely small amoiurt of signatures gairied *ui d,,. to the happenstance of rneeting the occuparu, or,rii" of their residences.bnly u '*utl n:t':!tt"l-':::,t:d Aparlrnents had managers located "rl.i*, "ra in two of the three cases' we were able to secLlre signatures fromthem attesting to the r".i',t"i*" were denieo-entry as soricitation of their residents for any purpose was strictly prohibited. irr.." ,vp.. or o*titing'"ton'tp'i'" approxi,rately 34 perce,t of the residettces Hff'"T?"se tvpes of residences had .a number of vacancies'^:1^,:::.:'T;:'::f t' r'rs to gairr signatnres, as there *"r" n" ,"ridents u,uiruUi"' Only when tlrese residences were confirmed as vacant wlre they added to the petition dataas sr"[. ou..oncern in this area is that these residences could be counted 65 "l'lo" roi"r'*f1"r, in fact, tf'"y tf.lot'fa not be counted towards the total number of residences from *rr'il-h *" ur" required io obtain signatures. Additionally, there were several residences where w" "outa not obtain as the occupants were never ltome, although these residences rvere visited nLlmerous tines. while we u'derstand that these also cou.t as ".o" votes, we feel it is importa,t to note the distinction u"t*."I";;;;""iuutty sayi.g no and sorneorle.ot bei,g uuuiluUf " to consider or sign the petition' Finally, when trre number of vacancies and Secured reside.ces are take'into acco'nt, two irnportant pieces of data .*"rg".iir;, *: y."* uUi" ioobtain a majority of signatur-es.for the total amount of residences regardles's oi accessibirity. s".i,.,a, gir., tt',. higlr p"r"entlage of signatures obtained from Non-secure reside'ces it is reasonaur" to pro.i"7t that rrad ,i,e-been able to approac' these residences we would have acquired an even ,r,or" ,r[rii,tial ,umtrer of sig.atures' Tlre results of this petition demonstrate there is an overwhet,ring uni",i,rt'oiruppon within Iur neighborrrood for the granting of within 400 feet of our ProPertY this permit. Should the city determine that we must gain signatures.from Secured Apartments in order to show an even greater acceptance of our petition,-we "tt"'"q-"tiing that the city irovide us with guidelines for obtaini,g signatures rr"-irr"." ,vpes of *ria"r."'r',hat io not infringe upon the privacy and desire to not be soricited exhibited by the owners. we would furtrrer request ai er.iension in trre time required to gain these additional signatures' Breakclown of Petition Data Nunrtrer c'rlTotal Resiclences *ithin 400 t'eet of ottr pl'opeft\' NutrrberofTotalVaca,.,tResidences(rron.votes)rr,itlrin.l00t.eetofottrpropert\ NunrberofTotalInhabitedResiderrcesrvithin400feetofourproperb" N;;;.t of Total Signed Residences within 400 feet of our properrr" ir.r"*g" of Resid-ences rvho signed this petition Number of Secured Apartments rvithirt 400 feet of ottr property Number of rotal N";:;;a)1,.,t,uuit.o Residences rvithin 400 feet of our propeft)" " " PercentageofNon-secu,.allnt,uui..aResidenceswlrosignedtlrispetition Number of Single Family Homes witlrin 400 feet of our properry Number of Vaca.t Si'rlfe Family Homes rvithin 400 feet of our property""' Number of Totat I"h;;:t;i ii"gi. Fali!l Homes rvithin 400 feet of our propeny""""" Number of Total sig;;;;i""nu,r,ity Homes within 400 feet of ottr propefty"""" ""' p.t."*g. of SinglE iamily-Homes who signed this petition NurnberofNorr.SecuredApartmentswitlrin400feetofourpropefty Number of vacant Non-Secured Apartments withirr 400 feet of our propefty Number of Total r,rrr"iit.a Non-Secured Aparlments.y,lhi]r^100 feet of our property " ' Number of Total Si;;;N"r-Secu..d Aparlments within 400 feet of our property"""' Percentage of Non-Secured Apartments who signed tlris petition Number of Secured Apartrnents within 400 feet of our property NurnberofVacantSecuredApartmentswithin400feetofourproperty NumberofTotalt,,t..uuit.osecuredApartrnentswittrin400feetofourpropeffy NumberofTotalSignedSecuredApaffmerrtswitlrin400feetofourpropefty Percentage of Secur?d Apartrnents who signed this petition .-t5l ... l-+ .339 .119 53% .r20 219 82% ..138 ,,..|2 ..126 .. 107 85% ................... 1 20 ......... Unknown ......... Uttknorvn Not Applicable ...........'....None rllt q o{ Not LandoneaneneJ M E B Carson. AndersonChristinSchottBill DuffieldAldoraine Carson Lafontaine X X X Avencoln28Li1 1200 Lincoln Ave hino Ave.1206 X Y X AvencolnLi2061 Ave.Lincoln1 Ave.1 1209 Ave121 Suzette Hamm Reed Ave. 1 1 x X X 121 Lincoln 0 Ave. 1213 Tlincoln Ave 13 Susan Lee 1216 C Ave.Joscher Paloma Ave,l Elisa Max Deal 233 233 1 1 x X X,1 1 1 Paloma Ave. Paloma Ave Ave. Paloma Ave. Ave Ave. arl deQ deQuant Manuel Gomez Donna Gaul Elisa XAve.1 1240 lrene L. Harris Liu 1 244 1 1 1 X X Ave Ave Ave. Ave aloma Ave. X 1244 1248 1244 245 DebbieSambrailoJohn Ben Jeff X 1 1 Ave. Ave. 1 Ave. Lisaohn J lrina Downton Robert 1 X253 1256 X 1 1 Paloma Ave. Ave.Linda Bickelman Lianne Maroni X X X x AvePaloma1 Ave.301 P 1305 1308 Laura L. X1 Ave. Ave XAve.11 1 Paloma Ave.1 21 Suhair C.B. Tai 1 12 2 Lincoln Ave. Ave. Ave. 315 13'l 13 Ave. 9 Laura Herberts Ambots Sterner Flood Jessica 1 1320 Ave Ave. 1321 xAve. Ave XAve321 Hall ChartonJ 1 Ave.1 Ave. X325 John 1329 Ave.ilottJotrnson, Gayle. XAve.1 I 333 i (l (l xl -+l- -+l- XI XI --xr xl XI -+F xt -+- XI+- XI XI xl xl XI XI-+- XI XI ) l\l X X AveLincoln1425 Ave.1 k no" door and I have to sa nottdWottrdinance"othewith Geraldine O' wereI heard ',1 X X 3?'what if hewe don't likehas a"Our X too bad" X X don't want to nervous"memakeBullsPit X I have a ona S Hatesx Ilawnon around"morewant X 't like our his wife not dogswiththeISSUEanhavenotdoestheUStoldtheyhavenotTheywillsign.andstzetheirofafraidis - I have cats." X '1304 X Ave. AvenLincolI4Zt 1 Easton I Ave.Paloma1 '1256 c apuchino Ave Ave1224 Ave.1228 Ave.aro Ave1232 Ave1249 X X1309 Lincoln Ave. that too."have a law our whatdon'tallWEandjust11sinceSept.ordealersbedrugcould1dogthanmorehavewhoPeoplethink.canjustproblem,Iwhile yourunderstandandalibanTsYmPathizers and1atapuchinowithcloseare beotwantnotdoalsoourtheywithdogs,issueanhavenotdo Theydispute.abe neighbortoconsiderwhattheYofmiddlethe no intention of &make xl 71 1 15 Lincoln Ave. Lincoln Ave X ls thewithstick theto involvedbetowantdoesn'tandAnna doornot I can't Does not X XPaloma Ave.1328 1 1 X X X Ave Ave. Ave1332 1404 1 XAve.1 X Ave Paloma731 Eubmittedlist N ever came dates and times can needkthindon't"l meetIhousetocometo Ave. 214 C 1400 I Ti2 Homes Homes218'f1Ta 72 Total 1 i XMA AVC2O7 Pa X207Ave X207 Paloma Ave Matt natureXPaloma Ave. X1PalomaAve. X1PalomaAve. #6 Can't Alexx#81 X1Ave. #1 xT26'sGpuchino Ave. #2 DorrxAve. #1121 X1 SilvaxAve. #3121 xAve. #4121 xAve. #5121 X#6 MoriokaAT?apfhino Ave. #1 Lum 121 Ave. X1217Ave X217Ave XAve.7 X7 Paloma Ave.Stevex#21 X#3I X121Ave. X217Ave. ur ulie Ellis XAve. XAve. XAve.1 X#1I ToroX#41 WaltonX122#A X1221#B Kellet 1221 Ave. X1221Ave. 1224 #2 X224 X#5 JuliannaP Casas X#6 xAve. X X1 X HectorXAve.225 XEI NicoleXEl Ca XReal1EI Xno1 Navarrox#61 x1229#4 TanakaxAve. #6 Davex#1 Tx D.X XEI XEI Bill Sullivan XAve. #1 c^+txAve.M)236 lreneX1JenXlEoErcamlno Real #4 Xl23o frcamino Real #5 X#61 I LVNN lJIIIOTU Sharla Galle RoberX#21Camino lani238 El camrno Real#3 Xt2gsEiEmino ReaI4- idg capuchino AY9.4l- X Ave.chi KeX1244 i i t Iti i $ $ I.j - Ii i , lyes -il- rt Jenxl--xT-bannielle E ealCamino1244 1244 X#249 ino Xhino249 X#3249 X#4 X#1EI H Gomezx#2Camino 1 EI X n JawnX I R 1 1 1 x 1 I 1 XI+ N Laura Vida owatt#2 Camino Real Camino Real '1308 I 1 eanxREI #1 #3 TSTtEiGmF@1- lmEicamfioFee!il- Real #11316 El Camino Sin Ciaran eal 320 #4 #5 n Ave.X XAve.1 nPatrick Dunn XAveI X#6 1 121 -'t dont like "l'm siqn 220 a bad am like to of Pit X fc1 she would for Ave.1 free" -dooreven"l want Ave1 door for x x #3 X #6 X X17 XAve. #B X1 #1EI REI X 1 & meet can't no.' come to iome to the X226x X x Ave 121 6 #4 1 Ave.M ntuttipte ettemPlC-#2 canlist 7122 Name / NotesNot Home'VacantNoMaYesAddress Secure Entrance 1475 Lincoln Ave #1 Secure Entrance 1475 Lincoln Ave #2 Secure Entrance n e #3ncoL451 Secure Entrance'1475 Linco!n Ave #4 Secure Entrance 1475 Lincoln Ave Secute Entrance 1475 Lincoln Ave #6 Secure Entrance nI e #774Lin5co1 Secure Entranc€ '1475 Lincoln Ave. #8 Secure Entrance 1475 Lincoln Ave #9 Secure Entrance 0#1I14L5coln1 Secure Entrance 1#VEnLicol150 Secure Entrance VC #2iLlnnco4501 SecuIe Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave. #3 ecure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave #4 Secure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave #5 Secure Entrance e #61nLco4501 Secure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave. #7 Secure Entrance 8#VCILlnnco4501 Secure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave. #9 Secure Entrance 01ve#nLi ncol4510 Secure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave. #11 Secure Entrance 21#velnLnco4501 Se cure Enttance 1*3lnLncol4501 Secure Entrance'1450 Lincoln Ave. #14 ecure EntranceI#5lnve504ILncoI Secure Entrance 6#1iLlnnco450I Secure Entrance 1#7vetnLncol45I0 Secure Entrance 1450 Lincoln Ave #18 Secure Entrance 9#1velnL50ncoi4I Secure Entrance #20incolnL4510 Secure Entrance a i1CamRerno2461E Secure Entlance#2IReainoE46cIam21 Secure Entrance#3aloReniEmlCa2416 Secure Entrance Ia #4IrnomRe2461E Secure Entrance#5ReainoIEamC2461 Secure EntranceReao#6cIamn21E46 Secure Entrance 1246 El Camino Real#7 Secure Entrance#8ainoReIEmCa246,1 Secure Entrance IRea #9CIlnamo2461E Secure Entrance#I 01oinReaE46CamI21 Secure Entrance 1#1ReoalCamnEI2461 Secure Entrance2#1RealInom2461CaEI Secure Entrance#1IReainoEamC2134 SecureEntrance#2IReaoEICamn2134 Secure Entrance alRe #3Camino234'1 E Secure Entrance#4CRealInom2,1 EI34 Secu re Entrance i234 Elcamino Real #5 Secure Entrance#6nIIReaoIECam2341 Secure EntrancqalRe#7E1noml2341 Secure Entrance 1234 El Camino Real#8 ecure Entrance#9olnReaIEamc21 Secure EntranceI#0CamRealno2341EI Secure Entrance 1#1alnoReCaEImi2134 Secure Entrance2#1IrnoReaIEaCm2134 ecure Entrance IRea 3*1IEtnoCam2341 Se cure Entrance#I 41niReao2341IECam Secure Entrance 1#5nomtalReCaEI2341 Secure Entrancel1I6inomReacEIa21ecure Entrance7#1otnIReaEamc2341 ecure Entrance#I I1nIReaoEmCa2341 Secure Entrance 1#I Reno alUAEI1 Secure Entrance#20IRearnoECam2134 Secure Entrance#1IRearnoIEamC220I ecure Entrance#2IImReanoIE2201 Secure Entrance 1220 El Camino Re al #3 Secure Entranceino Real #41220 El Secure Entranceino Real#51220 El Secure Entrance n Reao #6IEamc2201 ecure Entrance n Rea #7IEacmo2201 I II - (Secure Entrance)1220 El Camino Real #8 1220 El Camino Real #9 Secure Entrance1220 El Cam no Real #10 Secure Entrance1220 El Camino Real#11 SecLJre EntranceT220 El Camino Real #12 Secure Entrance)1220 El Camino Real #13 (Secure Entrance)'1220 El Camino Real#14 Secure Enkance1220 El Camino Real #15 Secure Entrance1216 ElCamino Real #1 (Secure Entrance)1216 ElCamino Real#2 (Secure Entrance)1216 El Camino Real#3 (Secure Entrance)1216 El Camino Real#4 (Secure Enkance)i 212 El Camino Real#1 (Secure Entrance)1212 El Camino Real #2 (Secure Enkance)1212 ElCamino Real#3 (Secure Entrance)'1212 ElCamino Real #4 (Secure Enlrance)'1277 El Camino Real#1 (Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real#2 (Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real#3 (Secure Entrance)'1277 El Camino Real #4 (Secure Entrance)1277 El Camino Real #5 (Secure Entrance)1277 ElCamino Real #6 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #1 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #2 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #3 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #4 (Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #5 (Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #6 (Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #7 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #8 (Secure Entrance)'1500 Sherman #9 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #10 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #11 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #12 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #'13 (Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #14 (Secure Entrance)1500 She.man #15 (Secure Enkance)1500 Sherman #16 (Secure Entrance)'1500 Sherman #17 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #1 I (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #19 (Secure Entrance)1500 Sherman #20 (Secure Enkance)1219 Paloma Ave. #1 (Secure Enkance)12'19 Paloma Ave. #2 (Secure Enkance)1219 Paloma AVd. #3 (Secure Entrance)1219 Paloma Ave. #4 (Secure Enkance)1220 Paloma Ave. #2 (Secure Entrance)1220 Paloma Ave. #3 (Secure Entrance)1217 Capuchino Ave. #2 (Secure Entrance)1217 Capuchino Ave. #3 (Secure Entrance)'1217 Capuchino Ave. ,l4 '120 Total Secured ResidencesTOTALS 40 Total Residences with Manager Signature Denying Admittance 60 Total Residences with No Manager in Residence IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIIII (Secure Entrance) tr tTl It- T-T----TTTT-I rT-T T-t T-TT-Tt I IIttlt--T__] - Ltl ---r- 't;! PErtuoN FCP Cirv FrRl,ttr City of Burlingatne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on uny premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male or female of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be granted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their private property and within their home. ./'/ hqo d €thryoq _lzfl az/k/,;, 4!- Signature mme (pnnted)Address 4 s/'4"frn /L7{ clf<thfr,?/d Sigruture Signature Signature Name (printed) b?ail c G re41 Name (printeti) Nanre (pnnteiit 48 (r+qulftuO AUq Address Address Address Dan 5k u n,"l7Y { Qrrlrt^ #Ll Name (printed)Address .bk-er.L'rt "\vrS Kn*/aY7 q",j,*9)l\o Signature Name (printed)Address l75t Address Address K)ozr,;, V\uror.z+>nD+ Narne (printed) Druig t Po{k<rt, ;tx'ItZc' Ca1-,,7-/,,r.,o, * 4 Name (printed)Address ).r-t,n \rvr"Yrr \{1,0 u It4I Name (printed)Address t #t L;ro Ve,A*+Aet- Name (printed) I fio-da-L.&r.r; I ) \ tl Cal.,tr hrnp Nr"r" tpri.t"dl Address I -r PprtuoN FoR CtrY Ppnutr City of Btrrlingarne under the pro'isions of ordinance g.04.060 the city council may grant a permr^t for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "itr,.. male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideirt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the aautt residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two on their private ProPertY and within their home Signature Name (printed)Address lt_e.\ V"€u; i Ia-L-A h.o A v< Name (printed)Address .+ Address u\\1-;LZ \_B <1 Narne (printed) alne Name AddressSignature fc-- Address Address +l G[^^ U"[r/"()e( cAluct'$tlo/Are ,( Name (printed)Address ,\tt \r rt Address 3t{ Address *\a,c cr/r I $jgnature Name (printed) d 11 ame (printed) b Signature Name (printed) frit gDT,5 ruc gc.iEe Fu >1",. 1 I I ! t I I l PprtuoN FoR Ctrv PPnHatr City of Burlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine rnonths and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their private property and within their home. UVu IY t AAed Cft t/)n<..PY A Name ,)o/{ n,/* Address Y t nTos t Jls Address ,./os /3 zS Address Address Z Address Signatue Signature Signature Name (printed) Narne (printed) a), rl\a 4r/.- _/ -_\s h-so I 33 ? c,..*-rl-o,4- Name (printed)l*c b*ort 4-- Name (printed) \ -F*5 \,J"Ut 's2l G J"\ \-us R Name (printed)Address J h 6 Name (printed) T)"rylWiLru lTh l)ncdn Nz*eiNa*ltp'i"GAt Address (printed) ( ..-/tzr2-Pe (printed)Address lon* ks Address '::i PErtuoN FoR Ctrv Penutr City of Bttrlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adutt reiidents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned,as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two on their pri property and within their home. (printed)Address .., I L /z+07,/*,o 4rulzttt* Narne (printed) Name (printed) Name (printed) Address ? /c /rr"*'a &n Address lrr\263?h/trvlk t'<nt' I l*'/ t Address (L(1 LoA,4 ft"€ Name (printed)Address /KErci KEnf/tzy'o Cnfuclr */r Name (printed)Address 'T,i-5.,*,ftob Ca?uc*rrw ,{UZ, Name (printed) (printed) Address Chlrbro Signature L Address Address )l tla-14rr','Gb*y* /ao5 "]r, n 4r:a Name (printed) Name (printed) d,0 ?( \r>c Name (printed) ,J Address s {+ L INDA OIC)QL^J*NL .z/ /JD b (aqt 'na flYa' Address / PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Ppnnatr City of Bttrlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .itt.t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a reside-nt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. four hundred feet ofthe boundary lines ofthe residence of their desire and intention to keep more than two Lr Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance dogs ontheir private property and within their home' I Name Address _f4;^#g d(a Name (printed)Address TnwftRn-r FDUbr v 15 cRnf,ulf\c AVr # 4 Name (printed)AddressSigrature Signature S,\r^.a. Name (printed) Name (printed) Name (printed) lztS y',t"43 Address >)9 AddressSignature {u^:,lc- TawoV,,-t >L! CAPuCtl t lto fi)e46 Address EETrr fr trflL/Az=ofrhcfuntD fuf{ =Name (printed) 0Y So t; Name (printed)Address tqn d-tP 3 C*r A uf5 Address $ . l,\orrh €,\ AddressName (printed) DIV ID (, 6ERVfr5I ) Lfi(ocH tuo (*3)lL,l Name (printed)Address 0\rir LoLz l).q\ Signature Name (printed)Address tt-turhino tr, \z i : i I i i II PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Penlatr City of Burlingame under the provisions of ordinance g.04.060 the city councir may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .iit "t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideit presents a-verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as ofthe applicant, grant on their adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two within their home. Address ss L i\Iii Name +5,"*C \is t^ $*1 L C7/?,' Signture Sigrature Name (printed)Address As 1" lJtc-t" 36 ?"9.-r*-- *w4- Name (printed)Address Ll,tsk 0 D A I nil)pnrna ,+tt'{lLv b Name (printed)Address 73{Po/r^a 4yt (printed)Address Narne Jbftr\) &L rtNC 33 (/n/a hfc- Name (printed)Address 'boQL ,k 7+o ro tlD Address tu ly t7/+ 7 UqTffi /3/J qr,".-L"/4re.. Name (printed)Address l4of (printed) 4 [, tt- Address L r\ C()"\A^.{ ) c t .1 I t PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pr,nvtr City of Btrrlingatne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, iittt"t male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. rhis permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide - signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant ouiunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their private property and within their home' A IRA NO I3&.q Pn uor't { xv<- . Name Name Address -V Jr / ?)b PJ, AddressSignature L-a.-,-l.zr. Ar/h 13 )a P.-t"-n '*- Name (printed)Address /) /,/""'E, Lr.*n, 6<tn* n/t1/A /o/n.u Name (printed)AddressSignature \rJrecrN\ A McGr,, WAN \3'b6 Lr nca(n' Name (printed)Address w,tl{tru /, nr-I 3o( L/rn? Name (printed)AddressSiguture tW,,t-'Na Lt'tI)nt-l3rt Name (printed)Address Cfi lF ()2 / o4{ Name (printed) Name Name (printed) Address lu,u6w^r)tsrtr"f Nex{osc\<r lZz+ (atr,^* - /Wc- Address \?\ I),tD 8.6N1,o L s'ffi-----V Name (printed) c- Address \*^',- r I .S PprtrloN FoR Ctrv Ppnutr City of Burlingame under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, ii*"r male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resideirt presents a verified petition containing bona fide ^ signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two and within their home )J'"r ("^!<A.,\o L4 ct ^/.k 2-_-t-P Name (printed)Address Name (printed)Address we of 0r,,, Li,^= .l?<+" L " q,r *-a k< Name tprintea) Address ) vLU/"4 ftvel.Lt/4 (printed)Address J 4rrrrt-/.*r,tUorv l/rt (tuoo"lJ ,{rt Narne (printed) Name Name Name Name Address lry n se 1 // Address o\elL.taY 6 (/ ')^fu)z--a ( AddressSignature I\Z'^) LbLN A(TLr Address pirL J"ful.t Lt 2r Vi"tcJ* lut Signature (printed)Address Name (printed)Address i\e bhe S *baa,,lo \ i I PprtuoN FoR CtrY PPnHatr City of Burlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents awerified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority ortne adutt reiidents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grunt oriunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their private property and within their home' Signature Sigrature Signature Name lni \^-e g 7l,t) ^Narne (printed) Name Name &,nncP.- Address a,(*23-C,A-- &u^dorr.,^. D.rI[,u\.\?-i)t U,yr\.,c\r'\ AVqn 0<-.-AI Name (printed) Name (printed) Name Name AddressSigrature Signature t2D 1 l*i t\",I t/1 fl)e I .) Address /u't9z-l 1fr,>nr{ Address \f- G*p*lZl6 /-;.,/n ,4* Name (printed) 14ao (**,=. J Name /Je6 /t .'t Oo /n /r* Address Address C ll-La Sigrature Name (printed)Address Ptrcou* [-e A-*'-' PprtuoN FoR CtrY PEnvtr City of Btrrlingarne under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "ittr.r male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. this permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant ou;nderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on iheir private property and within their home' n*A A Fto "rqAddress - -() Name (printed) ks (printed) Narne (printed) Name (printed) Address Strrp- lzgb Aevl'h N€ (^d 4g-lvuq1 t4l C{.."-h- Address Address Ar.4/- vu4 S IZIL c C 1e\.il '3r;l* t Name (printed) Name p-ts Name (printed) Address Address Address -(z- 15- Address a,tliltk/u O^,^ot2% ( (no - 1-(-VL} Signature -+ Name (printed) 6,1,,)q,lilcz I Z, q nc-h^n- Address a Address 0 Name (printed) n Name (printed) /l 0 (J^r + 't I U"^col* d,*, PrrtuoN FoR Ctrv Pnnvtr City of Btrrlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04 060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide ,ijrutr... of a majority of the adutt residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned,as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their Private ProPertY and within their home Ly (t22t Pa(.o*a-b"r( . Name Name (printed) Address /Z Address ?rla6e5rtca-I t/ O { Lt' na I ntlv U e- 6 4 qA-/-- Name (printed)AddressSignature Name (printed) / Lt7 oi( 9-r -7Jt teTfe v/LL /tP/tL*/ Name (printed) LE Name Address t*f-l,z1 ?il-,rn*{{ 9Gt/g Address Address Address a *#rJat ? & Name 'zll5 0zo l, Name (printed) S'.o-i et\'s /720 Name (printed)Address folo-o +1 &le- I PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pgnnatr Citv of Burlingame Under the provisions of ordinance g.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, .itt.r male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide signatures oru .u.loriif of the adutt residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore,we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and accePtance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their property and within their home. Name (printed) Name (printed) Crz /t'rs /a,^1 Name (printed) {o Address zt5 Address Address />t7 Address t7 lI^ Address lzzr Address Address e + ^-u e_- #/ it Signature Signature Name Name 4z- # r1A_ tut kln Name (printed) ame Name (printed) ,( Name (printed) /il4rry- LJ o tJt- Address Address ) /?D7 AddressSigtature Signature Name (printed)Address llNCo IJJ AVE ( C,ttssa Ketterl-l- k*lctl+an{us BS4taGlur.r$ qus #5 i PprtuoN FoR CtrY Pgnxnr City of Bttrlingame under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a reside]nt presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence ofthe app licant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their private property and within their home. 0@e sffi *l(-/r lzo++ Name (printed)Address t Name Address Name (printed) \'i r-r-:f \Ni . 1 +1 -tr?tB)_+< Name (printed) J,l,Yl Name (printed) Address 77aa Cn p uC ,ft( Address /2 C7 QALouu,{ d8u Name Address /-wils (2 /7 f t rot'tt- irk * Name (printed)Address ,9u,J', il*I 4?# Name (printed) Name (printed) Address Address DA TEfr4 Name (printed) rlst/ Address lzt Fl (,rn t41Ll L ..:, PnrtuoN FoR CtrY Penvtr City of Bttrlingarne under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant ouiunderstanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs ontheir private property and within their home' A 4{^?-tA Name AddressSignature (ffi,^,ro)futtr (rt ,b\ft $tq-'b-trtt (printed)Address Address Address E{ M 0a-/*(* lu(, {l C4^4 Name (printed) Ly nn G{o'J )4bLl Ca*rltb,+U Name (printed) Name (printed) Address \)37 +q€t Cam\no Address \qn Q,nSSuvWn 1238 Dl (Av^r^o #z Name (printed)Address {[*th R#*/ ( pa^l-r--- O?ao e( Cql^i- # 7 Name (printed)Address \g+fiU,f* 6 M/r1rJr.[s tr:L Address YL* ?v cl"<\\b ?z;a-Jk.l h 6L Name (printed) Address / b?{ Name Address Ga.',*c Aua\rn Name (printetl) \ela\\G*,.,"&5 6rr'cc [.Je\int^' Signature PprluoN FoR Ctrv Ppnxrtr City of Burlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male or female of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be granted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two and within their home. /Lltl.,- t/i,^J,*-lan -A-*#3 Sigratue Name (printed)Address dogs on their pgivate property vd,P- lagZCq,<Atrr: AQ Name (printed)Address Address drru 77,*-4*.4.fr*<@ -Y.n Z,aWrt Dqq ?9 (Anq, Wrl-O % Name (printed) (printed) Address QN k-n_(u7L c LLftru i,uo ("/.( 4 (printed)Address (. l-wGiv (rA?s* Signature q-c) Sigrature o laL €! %E &44tK Address lUX, fl (@rv ft-2r.ql ft$ Address tLSo Er CA*t,*o &r. €L Name (printed)Address Mlu 4/v< tw/h {t Nvs tL?o fl Gfi,r,trw Signature h Name (printed) Name (printed) Ch,n.u-rut Address Address r'() Signature Name (printed) 4/-cy-I Address Dt Ar nd Z,^l I 0^) PprtuoN FoR Ctrv PEnvttr City of Burlingarne under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, either male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a resident presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adutt residents within four hundred fbet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance of their desire and intention to keep more than two property and within theiron \.s,=sq S Name (printed) tia3 t U)'14 A^,€ . {tr + Address rt,€ilDdlfr l?-o-7 Pel.-.,'tt * L 4-/ /- Ur,rt,,te-l{en fr<l)aL e [ (dor,*ou I &,e Address Address Address lz7r.€( Ca,nino {Ze^!+z- Address // Address ,\r\ ll Address Name (printed) o (printed)Address 9 tA Frxr2p 1241 LL- C+.,-<* P<4- +'--t Name (printed)Address I ?)/ fu[41b'r',',( 4 \?1.1 ta{ ,tc,0,ln tk'tu ,^ Signature u (printed) Tnnnu e Name (printed) Name (printed) Name (printed) Lelqn4 ^et\ ; I V"lt /23o tlC.xn'tdflc) Signature (__ Address Req I Name (printed) Name (printed) ' PErtuoN FoR CtrY PEnHatr City of Burlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit for a person to have' keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than two dogs, "itt ". male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. this permit may be gianted when a reside-nt presents a verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within lour hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant. Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant,our understanding and acceptance oftheir desire and to keep more than two dogs on their property and their home. t&-a_(Nni."-,,l Name (printed) T lr0f-t/- G,u^/ ^)b #5 irlentiony2 Name (printed)Address +-*r/;} N,krttznD)A t>6e gt Cx-rr/Xa t / Name (printed)Address €i teer-, ?,//6 5 il &nur#{ Name Name Address Address Z Vur E,w-*,I L71 {/ frtrr,n o FZ Name (printed) Name (printed) .Ga Name (printed) Address l?538t MlND {rr / Address /3/2 EL CA /Ylt U 0 fLE At-' Address Address Address #L r- Sigmture I X4 Name (printed) Name Ub euUou<rx:o Wnd\-I Sigrature Name (printed) @r6 0et Address tTt2 €/ A-n;nr' (a-C #3 PprtuoN FoR Ctrv Pgnmr City of Btrrlingarne Under the provisions of ordinance 9.04.060 the city council may grant a permit tbr a person to have, keep or maintain on any premises within ttre city, more than two dogs, "iin"r mafe orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residelnt presents averifred petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundied feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant four hundred feet ofthe boundary lines ofthe residence Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within ofthe applicant, grant our understanding and acceptance dogs on their private property and within their home' of their desire and intention to keep more than two /3 n fu C'<*rt^*'*t ELT kzl.JUG +-*"4 a 8q. L (printed) faill u(1 Address I 5to flk)o K-G4 ^)t>^r[ J. Address L3Lo Z\ Cr.'ai$o L Address Address Ra"l :# \ EL Ct--m,i o (A-L* 3 ' ( / Sigtature Name Narne (printed) (printed) Name (printed) Name /).l-'tot ol Qlora Address 131 L C < rnlqoOt/' Signature &"rA ylLe tr^ ffha ) a (> Tn Address (--/C*n,t/dl- L C*Pd e e,4, d h.^,no *t gf$Te EuQLt 9rvt acTq rydd P,4 at/f ol a) ll ri .trl Name (printed) (printed)Address Name (printed)Address u>h UEA, J.tba € Address Address 3*l ,n7 tt,rr14-- ,t /s #( Name (printed) (2Odta Bi Signature Name @rinted) VrA,a- Address €/ne #- / €t Ar- / PnrtrloN FoR CtrY PEnHalr City of Burlingame Underthe provisions of ordinance 9.04.060the city council may grant a permit for a persouto have, keep or maintain on any premises within the city, more than trvo dogs, .itrr". male orfemale of the accepted age of nine months and over. This permit may be gianted when a residJnt presents a-verified petition containing bona fide signatures of a majority of the adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant Therefore, we the undersigned, as adult residents within four hundred feet of the boundary lines of the residence of the applicant, grant our understanding and accePtance of their desire and intention to keep more than two dogs on their Private ProPeftY and within home. Y^fu I?85 E{Gnno Name (printed)AddressSignature er/O//,-e 2-z;t t-/ G*.,, {oo / o' Name Narne (printed) N u,' Narne (printed) .A-rr (printed) J,q (printed) ).r.r f eUV, Name Name (printed) l-- Name lZrT El (e.*a u'".^ Address $wre Address Address Address e la C Vk/L*"4 /?68 ?* Cz*-:---^ /-J Address \{' a. tt(( Lc..- 6s.4,u. a.C- Address 7u" Bo tca otr /3 n-s/c** k-L#; Address n.'uLuESS kV"'h^. /+*tTSz E@€ Address Signature Name (printed) <t =ctl S Address Ur"!.r*- u^" ^ ^e(Z^ , */ta_(*l As manager of this comprex I am refusing Mr. Roper acce"ss to *]- ]:i:",, while I understand trrat he is seeking signatures for a petition in regards to clti' ordlnance g.O+."OOO. r'l'e do not allorv our residents to be solicited for an* reason' yA- t As this comPlex i, h-l;''ud'Lir^i I am refusing Mr. RoPer access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a city ordinance 9.04.060.allow our residents to be soticited for any reason' S4 7J t-rltre/_- (printed)Address As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a p",iii"-i *grOr,o .i6;;Ji"** 9.04."060, *" io not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Name (printed)Address Signature As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr Roper access to my tenants. while I understand tlEt he is seeking signatures for a petition in regards to cit| ordinance S.O+300, *. do t ot allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Name (printed)Address Signature As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my teilmts. while I understand that he is seeking signat[res for a ;ti,|o[fi regards to cit| ordinance 9.0+.-ooo, *. do rot allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Address Signature As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a pliiii". ti r.gards to cit| oroinance 9.0+.-060, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Name (printed)AddressSignahre As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand that he is seeking signatures for a Gitr"" i; regards to cit! ordinance S.0+.-000, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Name (printed)AddressSignature As manager of this complex I am refusing Mr. Roper access to my tenants. while I understand tllat he is seeking signahrres for a ;;titi"" ii regards to city ordinance 9.O+.OOO, we do not allow our residents to be solicited for any reason' Signature Name (printed)Address ,:V ' -\ ir'i;\, . i: \,r1 1 :-T.,,\' 'Name (Prirtted) Name (printed) ) Z-- L15' trEl'YE , lhc* 3tarr&s > UJ , Lll(J .C \ x E LL 5 fi l.+ o E + s ,E r- ) 6lCK{ato (r{nr r, *erz\.1u"1' 4.d -rtrrce b ( \$u2 'H\LDue{) li Loaa s*k, I u'ftilcL \^ " L)3e.nrot A t :r- = \r1 a T trAb.rl( tl*tD 6lor* uu,^e\. fut 0 C.APUCHIND XTJT. STAFF REPORT TO: AGENDA 8aITEM# MTG. DATE 1.07.02 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SI]BMITTED DATE:31.2001 APPROYED FROM:CITY PLANNER srrBIEcr:REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2001.-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR COMPLIANCE REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should review the proposed Draft of the 2001-2006 Housing Element (attached). Since this meeting has been widely advertised, there may be members of the public in attendance who wish to speak. Council may open the study item to comment from the floor. Staffwill be prepared to make a brief presentation on the content of the Draft element if Council wishes. Following discussion, Council should direct staff: 1. On any items in the report which should be modified or changed; 2. Determine if the document, with any proposed revisions, is ready to be forwarded to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for their review and comment. Planning Commission Action: At a special meeting on December 19, z}Ol,the Planning Commission held a study session to review the Draft 2001 -2006 Housing Element. (PC Minutes December 19, 2001) At the meeting the Commissioners commented on the draft element as did a number of members of the public. About 30 members of the public were present at the meeting. At the conclusion of the meeting the Commission directed staffto forward the draft to the council for review and to make the following revisions to the Housing Element action program. r Add a provision in the element to encourage public agency partnerships to provide affordable housing for employee groups such as teachers, hospital workers, city employees; o Add a policy to encourage the development of live-work units in the area south of Burlingame Avenue; o Develop zoning code changes to encourage opportunities and incentives for construction of live/work units and mixed use (commercial/residential) projects; o When extending the Second Unit Amnesty program, consider expanding the program by moving forward the eligibility date for exiting second units to qualify; o Clarify in the Housing Element that there is very liule undeveloped land in Burlingame for new housing development, that in Burlingame additional housing will be the result of reuse of land already developed in some other use or in less efficient residential development, o Add a section to the report which documents the time, effort and money spent to develop this draft ofthe Housing Element; and BY BY , REWEW OF THE DRAFT 2001-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT PRIOR TO SABMITTAL TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNA FOR COMPLIANCE REWEW January 7' 2002 o Encourage in the work program the use of private foundation grants to assist in funding affordable housing in Burlingame. These changes have been incorporated into the Draft Housing Element attached dated December 27,2001 The changes are shown in italics and are found on the following pages: Policy and implementation for housing for teaches, hospital workers, public employees: Pages H- 64,H-68 andH-76; Implementation programs for live-work units and mixed use zoning: Pages H-53, H-56, H-72 and H-78; Expansion of Second Unit Amnesty Program: Pages H-72 and H-78; Documentation of the time, effort and money spent developing the document: Page H-7 The need to extend design review to multiple family residential development was also discussed by the Commission. It was determined during the discussion that this program would be considered as apart of the needed revisions to the R-3 and R-4 (multiple family residential zoning districts) which will be considered at the Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting in February 2002. BACKGROUND: Staffbegan preparing the Draft 2001-2006 Housing Element, one of the seven required elements ofthe city's General Plan, in the Spring of 2001. While it was decided to do the research, civic engagement, and writing portions of the element in-house; the city did employ the services of a consultant to assist us in interpreting the state mandate and to assist staffin negotiations with HCD if any are required. Public involvement is a critical component of preparing a Housing Element. The city has held two widely publicized workshops to which residents, agencies providing public and housing assistance, and Council and commission have been invited. The Planning Commission also held a public forum type study session at which interested members of the public and housing providing agencies discussed the proposed element. With Council review the document will be ready for submittal to HCD as the statement of the City's housing action program for the next five years. Subsequent to HCD review the city will go through the General Plan amendment process which also involves hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Attached to the staffreport is a copy of the Executive Summary for the 2001- 2006 Housing Element. This can be used as a guide for your review of the contents ofthe attached draft report The key sections ofthe draft element not previously reviewed by the Council are the Site Selection Section and the Action Program in the Goals, Policies and Action Program Section. Of particular importance is the action program which defines in program and with quantified housing unit and program accomplishment targets the city's approach to addressing its regional fair share and community housing needs in the coming 5 years. ATTACIIMENTS: Planning Commission Minutes, December 19, 2001 Executive Summary of the draft 2001-2006 Housing Element Housing Element Goals and Policies, draft lanuary 2002 Planning Commission StaffReport, December 19, 2001, with map attachments: Existing Multiple Family Residential Densities, Proposed Transit Oriented Development, and Proposed Transition Areas. 1 I \ CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 19, 2001, special meeting of the Planning Commission to order at7:05 p.m. il. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Keele, Keighran (arived at 7:10 p.m.) Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Bojuds, Brownrigg StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. Iv. STUDY SESSION 1. Review of the Draft Housing Element Update CP Monroe presented an overview ofthe draft housing element and explained the process. CA Anderson gave an overview ofthe State requirements for updating housing elements. Commissioners noted that there are sites identified in the element for housing opportunities, would the same opportunities be available to other properties within the proposed residential overlay zones. Staff noted that the identified sites are examples of properties which have the most potential for development, but other properties in the area proposed for the overlay zones could also take advantage of the snme opportunities. Chairman Vistica opened the meeting to public comment. Philip Katrn , l45l Capuchino Avenue, Ed Hayes representing Peninsula Habitat for Humanity" Cathy Baylock, 1527 Newlands Avenue, Dan Anders on,72} Vernon Way, Russ Cohen, 605 kxington Way, ke Tanton, 845 Linden Avenue, Skip Bran4 l22}Iragrura Avenue, Chuck Mink, I 54 I Los Montes, Diane Condon-Wirgler, I 5 3 6 Clpress Avenue, and Connie Mills, 945 Laguna Avenue commented on the Draft Housing Element. Comments included: should look at the ratio between commercial and residential and effects on revenue; interested in aftordable housing, non- profits need incentives that help with land costs, reduced parking intransit-oriented developmentmakesthe cost of land per unit go down, it might not mean more units but they would be more affordable, should look at density limits for different areas; make sure there is an appropriate transition between high density and existing neighborhoods to provide a buffer; should look at the live/work units, they can provide for transition in commercial and industrial areas; should review parking requirements second units; should provide opportunities for affordable senior housing near the hospital; think that the time has come for the commgnity to accept mixed use development; concern with apartunents being torn down and replaced with high priced condominiums; should not use reduced parking requirernent as incentive in area near Broadway, already parking problems, might encourage residlnts to use public lots at night, could have uncovered parking rather than in a structure. 1 }il. ADJOT}RIYMENT Chairman Vistica adjourned themeeting at 9:20 p.m. Commissioners continued discussion, noting that the following items should be added to the housing element work program: , O Make sure there is provision in the element for public agency partrrerships for groups like teachers, hospital workers; E] Add policy to encourage live work units in the area south of Btrlingame Avenue o Look at rorrirrg code changes to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed use projects; El Extend design review to multiple family projects as a housing maintenance program;' O Look at changing the eligibility date to qualiff for the second unit arnnestyprogram to include units built after 1954; O Make it ciear in Housing Element that there is very little space in Burlingame for new housing development and document the time, effort and money spent developing this document; o Encourage use of private foundation grants to help fund affordable units; The consensus of the Commissior-l was to forward the Draft Housing Element to the City Council with the , revisbns noted above. CP Monroe noted that those in attendance would be notified when the report wasto be reviewed by the City Council. Chairman Vistica thanked those who came for their interest and attendancei,. Respectfrrlly submitted, nalph Osterling, Acting Seoetary 2 UNAPPROVEDMINUTES I 2. I 9 f' EXECUTTVE SI.JMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION By state mandate each city and county in California is required to plan for the housing needs for its share of the expected new households in the Bay Regron over the next five years as well as for the housing needs of all econornic segments of the city's population. This planning will be done in Burlingame by updating the city's 1994 Housing Element of the General Plan. Broad based community participation is essential to preparing an implementable and locally meaningful housing policy and action program. The program included in this document evolved from the participation and experience of over 180 local residents and representatives of agencies which provide housing and other social service assistance to city, county and regional residents. (Sea, , Pages H-5 -H-7) PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY Research on the Burlingame community since 1994 identified some themes of change. While the city's total population has remained fairly stable over the past 40 years there has been an increase in ethnic diversity and number of children living at home as well as decrease in the city's elder population. The proportion of the population in the labor force and their tpe of employment have rernained constant over the decade; while the median household income increased 6102. However, the cost of housing doubled overthe same decade. More than halfthe city's housing stock is over 40 years old; but despite its aging the city's housing stock is well maintained as exemplified by the number of building permits issued for improvements during the planning period. (See Pages H-8 - H-22) HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Residential developers looking to build in Burlingame face zoning regulations and fees comparable to those in other San Mateo cities. Like all cities in the state, but particularly because of our location on the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside agencies have come to play an increasing role which increases both processing time and cost of new residential development. Since, like our San Francisco Peninsula neighbors, the city is essentially "built out" land and conskuction costs drive up the cost of housing. While energy is a critical parameter to future growth throughout California today, the city has been aggressive in implementing local conservation and recycling legislation as well as disseminating information on energy conservation progrirms offered by other agencies. (See Pages H-23 -H-40) EVALUATION OF THE 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT There were three key programs which were the most successful in implementing the goals and policies ofthe 1994 Housing Element. These include the following: l) adoption of a second unit amnesty program which allows nonconforming second units which meet certain criteria to become a permanent part of the city's housing stock; 2) implementation of residential design City of Burlingame H-2 General Plan DR A['T HOI]SING RI,EMRNT ITT ITOITSTNC R,I,T"MT'NT EXECI.]TIVE ST]MMARY review to provide formaintenance of the existing housing stock; and 3) rezoning of certain commercial properties with a residential overlay zone to allow construction of high density residential uses- These successful programs are being used as a basis for development of the 20fl-2006 work progmm where it is proposed that 1) the second unit amnesty program be expanded to include more eligible properties; 2) apply the residential overlay zone to a wider area; and 3) build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing developers. (See Pages H4l - H46) COMMUNITY RESOURCES From a land use point of view Burlingame can be considered "retro". The City began as a "transit village" at the Burlingame Train Station (now designated a State Historic Landmark). Later the city annexed the Broadway train station and the "fiansit village?'adjacent to it. In 2000 a decision was made to build a new nansit hub in Millbrae on the city's northern border. Because the land area of Burlingame is primarily built-out, new housing opportunities will have to replace existing development In the proposed planning program the key sites for residential relse follow the "transit village" pattern of our past, and build on the new hansit access opportunities offered at the northern end of the city. The sites identified in the planning program near tansit hubs are at the north end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae and near the Broadway and Burlingame frain stations; sites in transition areas selected to improve the compatibility between residential and other land uses are located near the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Disfrict, along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield and on the south side of the Northpark Aparfinents. The site selection program evaluated residential densities and affordability and these opportunities were influenced by proximity to transit hubs. An infrastructure study and program confirmed that collection and processing facilities are in place to support these programs. (See Pages IJ47 - H-58) Implementation of the 1994 Housing Element demonstated the effectiveness of using local legislation to achieve housing policy. The single family residential design review process effectively conserved neighborhood character while supporting maintenance of an older housing stock. The Second Unit Amnesty program for conserving as affordable housing older second units in the single--farnily zoned areas was established and actively implemented. Commercial properties were converting to housing in areas where residential uses were encouraged with overlay zoning. Through code enforcement on a multiple family project a mechanism for retaining affordability through a local non-profit housing provider was forged. COMMT]NITY OPPORTUNITIES To insure the best opportunity for accomplishing the city's fair share need of 565 dwelling units, the proposed action program for the 2001-2006 Housing Elernent builds on the successes of the 1994 work program. The most effective programs which form the basis of the 2001-2006 work program include: legislative (zoning) incentives to build housing and affordable units; continuation of existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability such as second unit amnesty and design review; code enforcement; and developing successful partnerships with non-profit housing providers. (See Pages H-59 - H-62) City of Burlingame H-3 General Plan DR AT-T HOIISING EI,EMENT EXECUTIVE SI'MMARY HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AI\[D ACTTON PROGRAM The Housing Element's goals and policies describe the city's land use and development parameters for residential land uses. The action program for each policy describes the specific means and targets for each progftm to implement the city's housing policies between 2001 and 2006. The Housing Element is unique bwause a quantified five year work progam is required. Each action program also has a specified time frame. These requirements from the basis of the annual progress report the city give to the City Council and state. (See Pages H-63 - H-79) 5"i City of Burlingame H4 General Plan l-l HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS AI\D POLICIES GOAL A:PRESBRYE RESIDBNTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOI]RAGING MAINTENAI\ICE, IMPROYEMENT Ai\D REIIABILITATION OF TIIE CITYIS NEIGHBORHOODS AND IIOUSING STOCI( Policy H(A-l): Policy H(A-2): Policy H(A-3): Protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods. Continue rehabilitation of structures inpoor condition. Maintain rental opportunities by discouraging conversion of affordable rental units to condominiums. Policy H(Aa): Policy H(A-5): Policy H(A-Q: PolicyH(A-7): GOAL B: Promote programs that protect the City's lower-valued housing stock. Pursue federal and State funds for the rehabilitation of lower and moderate income housing. Provide pre-sale inspection upon request. Consider neighborhood quality when approving new and remodeled residences. PROYIDE VARIETY AI\D CHOICE OT'HOUSING BY PROMOTING HOUSING 0PPoRTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OX'AGE, SEX, RACE, col,o& MARITAL STATUS, DTSABILTTY, NATTONAL ORIGTN OR OTIIER BARRIERS. Policy H@-1): GOAL C: Promote equal housing opportunities for all Burlingame residents. PROYIDE HOUSING OPPORTTINITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, TBACIIBRS, HOSPITAL WORIGRS AND OTHERS IN THE SERYICE INDUSTRY WHO WORK IN BT]RLINGAME. Policy H (C): Inform local public sector and private sector employees about available housing assistanoe programs. Policy H(C-2): Policy H(C-i): Encourage inclusion of affordable dwelling units in multiple-family residential development. Encourage public agenq partnerships to provide housing, reduce commute time and facilitate retention of community based groups like teacherc, public employees, hospital and semice sector workers GOAL Dr Policy H@-l): Policy H@-2): Policy H@-3): ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING. Provide adequate, affordable housing for the City's elderly. Encourage alterations to existing structures that improve access for physically disadvantaged. Encourage housing opportunities for single-parent families. Hoasing Element Goals and Policies Policy H@a): Policy H@-5): GOAL E: Policy H(E-l): Policy H@-2): GOAL f,': Policy H(F-l): Policy H(F-2): Policy H(F-3): Policy H@a): Policy H(F-5): ) Policy H(F-6): PolicyH(F7): Page 2 Encourage housing opportunities for low income single persons. Support county-wide program for homeless persons. RBDUCE RBSIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERYE ENERGY A}TD IIELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS. Promote the use of energy conservation in residential construction. Encourage energy conservation measures in rehabilitation projects. ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OT' HOUSING. Improve balance of housing type, tenure and affordability by encouraging development of the sites and locations listed below to serve the income levels indicated. Vacant or Underused Sites: 1800 El Camino Real,0.9 acre zoned C-liR4 overlay 1875 California Drive, 0,33 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay 1870 El Camino Real, 0.78 acre zoned C-l/ R-4 overlay One additional office site,0.5 acre zoned C-liR-4 overlay Transit 0riented Sites 1730 Marco Polo Way, vacant 0.9 acre site zoned C-3 1777 Mvrchison Drive, vacant 1.3 acres zoned C-3 1825 Magnolia Drive, 1.4 acre site zoned C-3 California Drive north of Broadway, zonedC-2 Transition Areas Rollins Road south of Bloomfield, zoned R-3 East side of Carolan between Cadillac and Toyon, 5.4 acres zoned C-2 Area south of Burlingame Avenue commercial area, zoned C-l Maintain data base of existing R-3, R4 and CR zoning disfiicts to remain aware of the number of additional units that could be developed on "under-developed" parcels in these areas. Encourage construction of mixed commercial-residential projects. Encourage conversion of existing accessory living units to legal, safe and sanitary housing units. Encourage non-profit housing corporations to develop aftordable housing in appropriate sites in Burlingame. Work for expansion of Section 8 program in Burlingame. Encourage participation in the San Mateo County first-time buyer program (Mortgage Credit Certificate) and other ownership assistance progftlms. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Special Meeting StaffReport Sta@ Session to Review the 2001-2006 Draft Housing Element Planning Commission Action: The Plarming Cornmission should hold a public forum discussion to give and take input on the proposed Draft of the 2001-2@6 Housing Element of the Burlingame General Plan. By the end of the meeting the Commission should: I . Arrive at a consensus about any changes they would recommend be made to the-proposed Draft document; and 2. Determine ifthe document as corrected is ready to be forwarded to the City Council for their review. Beckground: At the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting in February 2001, it was agreed tha the city world proceed with the preparation ofthe State mandated update oftte Housing Elernent ofthe General Plan. After hiring an arhising consrhant, stafibegan the process ofupdating tle 1994 Housing Elerrort" InJrme and Sep,tember two widety publicized prblic workshops w€re held. The first fucused on commurdty changes in populatio4 employment and housing since 1994. The group also reviewed and updated the Goals and Policy statemert of the 1994 Housing Element. At the second wortshop the participants disossed potential sites for new housing units. Over all sonre 180 residents and 15 agencies wtich r€pres€nt vadous social serviceq housing interests and environmental concems were invited to paticiple in the workshops. Foltowing the wortslropg the input was incorporaed into a draft iiftie propoeil 200l-2006 Housirtg Element. The prqpose of the Special Study Meeting ofthe Plaoning Coinurission is to review the policies and the implementation programs proposed for the next 5 years. Staffsrggests the following struclure for tle meaing: - Statrp€s€ot the State madated requiremerb for housing elements, m overview ofthe major findfuE$ md prcgram recomm€oddions oftheproposed200l-2006mHoudng Element Commission and pubffc engage in a disanssion, managed by the Commission chairmarq ofthe mnteot ofthe proposed elernen! Staffwill keep frack ofany uggested changes to the report; At the eod of the meeing Cornmission shoutd direct staffabout whetler the report is ready, with changes incorporate4 to forward to City Counol fortheir review or r*ether a second meeting to rwiew uggested changes should be scheduled. MEETINGDATE Dccember 19,2fi)1 *t- . Stlf Sasiln a Rcricw du 2lN1-21)06 Dr$ Howing Elanat Deccmba 19, 2001 Housing Elcment Draft Attached to the staf report is a copy of the Executive Sunrmary for the 2C{JL-2C06 ]lsusing El€,ment. Please use this as a guide for your review of the cofrent of the various sections ofthe Draft 2001-2006 Housing Etement. Discussion will focus on the Goalg Policies and Action Program section It is this Section that defines what the city will do to facilitate accomplish€nt of its fair share housing and corrmunity housing needs for the coming 5 years. Ncrt Stcps in Housing Element Review and Adoption The state maodate on Housing Elernents requires that the city zubmit a preliminary draft of ils 2001-20O2 Housing Element to the Calitomia Department ofHousing and Cmmity Dwdo@t ([ICD) for rcviow and cornment be,fore the City takes fonnal adopion action on the element. After a 60 day rwiew poiod HCD will notify the city about any adjustrnerns or revisions which they would suggest be made to qualify the elerne1rt for State certific6ion Staffwill then preseirt the Housing Elernent fofmally to the Plaming Commissiou- 'Er t}is presedation staffwill inchrde suggestiom about changes which world be needeq if any, to comply with the HCD direction. The Plauring Commission will study the doorment and mggestions, hold a public heariag and make a recommendation to City Council on whether the revised element shogtd be adopted as a part of tie city's General Plan. Only the City Council can adopt amendments to the General Plaq so the City Council will also hold a public hearing and take ftral action on the 2001-2006 Houfig Element amending the General Plan. Attachments: Executive Sunrmary, Draft 2001-2006 Housing Element Under separate cover: Draft 2001-2006 Housing Elemen! November 28, 2001 2 rIIIffi mx ZONING LEGEND R-1 . SINGLE FAMILY R 2. DUPLEXRi. MULTI-FAMILY R.4 r MULTI-FAMILY CR r COMMERCIAURESIDENTIAL G1 WITH R-4 OVERI-AY CITY OF BURLINGAME RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAP A{STING MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DE'VS'T'ES o( _/ od 50 40 18 Units/Acre .d o( 40 UnltVAcre 38 35 Unlts/Acre rgryry oF HtusEoRouGH 44 31 Units/Acre N 3il Unlls/Acre w lOm 0 1000 2000 Fcct I r"Al :-l r_l -\X Unl6/Acre ':d,i. '*;.' 4t,. ...? BART/Mlllbrae Train Statono CITY OF BURLINGAME RESIDENTIAL ZOMNG MAP PROPOSED TRANS'T OruENTED DEVELO PM ENT o( _/ ,f TOWN OF HILLSAOROUGH .d o( N E 1000 0 1000 2000 F.ot:S R.1 R2. DUPLEX (> .,1.,..' ':': . t',;i ,i: ( l CITY OF BURLINGAME RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAP PROPOS ED TRANSITI O N AREAS --* o( .d o( .d N e s nIII tifiitillm ffi pnoposEorRANs R.2 R.3 R.4 CR a I ZONING LEG G1 WITH R-4 R.1 r r MULTI:FAMILY LYSINGLE FAMI OUPLEX BART/Mlllbrae Traln Statona r- TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH .j 1000 1000 Feet0 .:1,,',. t': I ,l HOUSINGELEMENT DRAFT - DECEMBER 27,2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY COUNCIL - Mary Janney, Mayor Mike Coffey, Vice-Mayor Joe Galligan Rosalie O'Mahoney Cathy Baylock Mike Spinelli PLANNING COMMISSION - Stanley Vistica, Chairman Ann Keighran, Vice-Chair Tim Auran Joe Boju6s Mike Brownrigg Chris Keele Ralph Osterling Jerry Deal Martin Dreiling Dave Luzuriaga CITY STAFF Jim Nantell, City Manager Larry Anderson, City Attorney Planning Denartment Staff The Housing Element was researched and written by Planning Department staff with review assistance by Jeff Baird of Baird + Driscoll. Meg Monroe, City Planner _ Maureen Brooks, Senior Planner Ruben Hurin, Planner Catherine Keylon, Planner - Erika Lewit, Zoning Technician S ean O'Rourke, Zoning Technician Shelagh Girot, Administrative Secretary PUBLIC PARTICIPANTS: 180 members of the public and l5 public agencies were notified of and participated in the Housing Element - workshops and study meetings. L HOUSING ELEMENT DRAFT - DECEMBER 27, 2001 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......... INTRODUCTION......... Backdrop Housing Element.. Housing Goals, Policies and Action Program.... Consistency with Other General Plan Elements Civic Engagement ................... Actions Required/Zoning changes Public Facility Capacity COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM Goals and PoIicies................ Action Program Summary of Housing Program Implementation .............. ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION...... DATA SOURCES. Appendix A - Community Profile and Projections........ ........H-2 ........H-5 H-5 ....H-5 H-6 H-6 H-7 PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY...........H-8 Burlingame Today..... Housing Needs Assessment ................ At Risk Assisted Housing Development ...... H-19 Projected Housing Need............... H-20 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES.... Constraints to Development.......H-23 ..H-23Government. Non-government ..........H-32 Energy Conservation Opportunities H-36 EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM ..... H-41 COMMUNITY RESOURCES............H-47 Land Inventory and Site Identification.... ..H-8 H-10 .......H-59 H-47 H-s6 H-58 H-63 H-66 H-75 Appendix B - Guide to Energy Conservation. Appendix C - Housing Funding Opportunities in San Mateo County ...... H-86 ... H-87 ........... H_87 H-80 H-105 H-rt2 Appendix D - Public Participation ........................... H-115 F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT EXECUTTVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION By state mandate each city and county in California is required to plan for the housing needs for its share of the expected new households in the Bay Region over the next five years as well as for the housing needs of all economic segments of the city's population. This planning will be done in Burlingame by updating the city's 1994 Housing Element of the General Plan. Broad based community participation is essential to preparing an implementable and locally meaningful housing policy and action program. The program included in this document evolved from the participation and experience of over 180 local residents and representatives of agencies which provide housing and other social service assistance to city, county and regional residents. (See Pages H-5 -H-7) PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY Research on the Burlingame community since 1994 identified some themes of change. While the city's total population has remained fairly stable over the past 40 years there has been an increase in ethnic diversity and number of children living at home as well as decrease in the city's elder population. The proportion of the population in the labor force and their type of employment have remained constant over the decade; while the median household income increased 6l%. However, the cost of housing doubled over the same decade. More than half the city's housing stock is over 40 years old; but despite its aging the city's housing stock is well maintained as exemplified by the number of building permits issued for improvements during the planning period. (See Pages H-8 - H-22) HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Residential developers looking to build in Burlingame face zoning regulations and fees comparable to those in other San Mateo cities. Like all cities in the state, but particularly because of our location on the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside agencies have come to play an increasing role which increases both processing time and cost of new residential development. Since, like our San Francisco Peninsula neighbors, the city is essentially "built out" land and construction costs drive up the cost of housing. While energy is a critical parameter to future growth throughout California today, the city has been aggressive in implementing local conservation and recycling legislation as well as disseminating information on energy conservation programs offered by other agencies. (See Pages H-23 - H-40) EVALUATION OF THE 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT There were three key programs which were the most successful in implementing the goals and policies of the 1994 Housing Element. These include the following: 1) adoption of a second unit amnesty program which allows nonconforming second units which meet certain criteria to become a perrnanent part of the city's housing stock; 2) implementation of residential design review to provide for maintenance of the existing housing stock; and 3) rezoning of certain City of Burlingame H-2 General Plan DRAF'T r.,I ,RMENT EXECUTTVE SUMMARY commercial properties with a residential overlay zone to allow construction of high density residential uses. These successful programs are being used as a basis for development of the 200l-2006 work program where it is proposed that: l) the second unit amnesty program be expanded to include more eligible properties; 2) apply the residential overlay zone to a wider area; and 3) build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing developers. (See Pages H-41 - H-46) COMMUNITY RESOURCES From a land use point of view Burlingame can be considered "retro". The City began as a "transit village" at the Burlingame Train Station (now designated a State Historic Landmark). Later the city annexed the Broadway train station and the "transit village" adjacent to it. In 2000 a decision was made to build a new transit hub in Millbrae on the city's northern border. Because the land area of Burlingame is primarily built-out, new housing opportunities will have to replace existing development. In the proposed planning program the key sites for residential reuse follow the "transit village" pattern of our past, and build on the new transit access opportunities offered at the northern end of the city. The sites identified in the planning progam near transit hubs are at the north end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae and near the Broadway and Burlingame fain stations; sites in transition areas selected to improve the compatibility between residential and other land uses are located near the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District, along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield and on the south side of the Northpark Apartments. The site selection program evaluated residential densities and affordability and these opportunities were influenced by proximity to transit hubs. An infrastructure study and program confirmed that collection and processing facilities are in place to support these programs. (See Pages H-47 - H-58) Implementation of the 1994 Housing Element demonstrated the effectiveness of using local legislation to achieve housing policy. The single family residential design review process effectively conserved neighborhood character while supporting maintenance of an older housing stock. The Second Unit Amnesty program for conserving as affordable housing older second units in the single family zoned areas was established and actively implemented. Commercial properties were converting to housing in areas where residential uses were encouraged with overlay zoning. Through code enforcement on a multiple family project a mechanism for retaining affordability through a local non-profit housing provider was forged. COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES To insure the best opportunity for accomplishing the city's fair share need of 565 dwelling units, the proposed action program for the 2001-2006 Housing Element builds on the successes of the 1994 work program. The most effective programs which form the basis of the 2001-2006 work program include: legislative (zoning) incentives to build housing and affordable units; continuation of existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability such as second unit amnesty and design review; code enforcement; and developing successful partnerships with non-profit housing providers. (See Pages H-59 - H'62) City of Burlingame H-3 General Plan D FT HOIISING ELEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM The Housing Element's goals and policies describe the city's land use and development parameters for residential land uses. The action program for each policy describes the specific means and targets for each program to implement the city's housing policies between 2001 and 2006. The Housing Element is unique because a quantified five year work program is required. Each action program also has a specified time frame. These requirements from the basis of the annual progress report the city give to the City Council and state. (See Pages H- 63 - H-79) City ofBurlingame H-4 General Plan DRAFT HO rN(: NI,EMF"NT INTRODUCTION BACKDROP The City of Burlingame is a community of 28,100 located roughly in the center of the San Francisco Peninsula. Two of the five square mile area of the City is located in San Francisco Bay and protected from development. The City adjoins San Francisco International Airport, a major regional focal point and employer. An extension to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system is cunently under constuction just north of Burlingame's city boundary; within a third to half mile of developed areas of Burlingame. Burlingame began as a "transit village", actually two such villages. The City got its start in 1908 at its two railroad stations, the main station at Burlingame Avenue and a secondary station at Broadway (annexed later). The city's civic center and largest commercial area focused on the Burlingame Avenue station and was quickly surrounded by single-family houses and summer cottages. The same was true for Broadway's more neighborhood oriented commercial district. In the 1920's, as the city grew, the single family houses closest to the civic center/downtown area were replaced with multiple family buildings. This pattem has continued. Today 51% of the city's residential development is in multiple family buildings, grouped around the hain stations and along the major transit corridors, including El Camino Real (State Route 82) which carries buses the length of the Peninsula. Because of the city's location and its access to a variety of types ofregional transportation including San Francisco Intemational Airport and to major employment centers, it is not surprising that 52Yo of the city's housing stock is rented. Burlingame is physically built out. Because there is no place to grow, Burlingame's population grew by only 5 percent in the past decade. Most of the physical growth since 1994 dwelling units) can be attributed to in-Iill development, primarily replacement of single family houses with apartment or condominium buildings located in hansportation corridors or in areas proximate to the city's hain stations. But while the total population did not change much, the proportion of the city's residents over 60 and under 18 shifted significantly, which affected the tumover and remodeVreplacement of the city's older single family housing stock. THE HOUSING ELEMENT Each city and county in Califomia is required to plan for the housing needs ofall economic segments of its population. Article 10.6 of the Govemment Code sets forth requirements for a Housing Element, one of the seven mandatory elements ofa local general plan. The substantive requirements for a housing element are set forth in section 65583 ofthe code. Recent amendments to the code require communities in the nine Bay Area counties to update their Housing Elements by December 31, 2001. The law sets out guidelines for the preparation and adoption ofa Housing Element. Local govemments are required to "make a diligent effort" to involve a1l economic segments of their population in development ofthe Housing Element. The future local housing needs numbers for Burlingame which are to be addressed in the housing element were developed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Local governments are also directed by the code to address City of Burlingame H-5 General Plan INTRODUCTION DRAF'T HOI]SING EI,EMF],NT INTRODUCTION this need by lowering barriers and encouraging the construction ofhousing for all economic segments of the population; but local governments are not required by State mandate to build housing directly or commit the city's operating funds to the effort of building housing. HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES Ai\D ACTION PROGRAM The Burlingame Housing Element is a statement of community housing goals and policies. It outlines the strategies that will be pursued to implement the community's housing objectives during the planning period (2001-2006). The action program identifies the strategies to be pursued in conserving and improving the existing housing stock, in providing adequate sites for future housing; in assisting in developing affordable housing, in removing government constraints which might affect housing production and cost; and in promoting housing opportunities within the community. The goals, policies and action progmm for the 2001-2006 Burlingame Housing Element is included in this report as its own section. Research Resources Burlingame's current Housing Element was prepared in l994.It was certified by the Califomia Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that year. The present document is an update ofthe 1994 Housing Element. This updated element uses population data from the 1990 and 2000 US Census; housing and employment data from the 1990 census; income data from the 1990 Census and State Department of Housing and Community Development; projections from the Association ofBay Area Govemments Projections 2000 forecasts for the San Francisco Bay Area; ABAG's Certified Final Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) Allocation, March 15,2001; and current local aftitudes and opportunities related to housing collected from local sources as referenced in the text. A list ofall the data sources used in preparation of Burlingame's 2001-2006 Housing Element is included at the end of the document. (See Data Sources Section, Page H-68) CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS The whole of Burlingame's General Plan or development policy is made up of nine elements. One ofthese is the Housing Element. It is essential that the goals and policies ofall ofthe General Plan elements should be internally and mutually supportive. If the Housing Element as adopted makes other elements of the general plan inconsistent, they should be adjusted. Together the other elements of Burlingame's general plan establish goals, policies, objectives and actions that affect housing. These otier elements establish categories ofnet residential density which are confirmed on the plan diagram: low density up to 8 dwelling units per acre; medium density 9 to 20; medium high density 21- 50; and high density over 50 dwelling units per acre. Areas ofthe city are identified as having potential for medium high residential density include areas around the periphery of the Burlingame Avenue-Park Road center (including Subarea C of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area), around the Broadway shopping center, and as a part ofthe complex ofactives in the Burlingame Plaza area (north end of Burlingame). Areas having potential for high density residential development are identified between Rollins Road and Carolan, as well as on the north and south sides ofthe Burlingame Avenue Commercial. Area. The areas identified for future housing development in the 2001-2006 City ofBurlingame H-6 General Plan DR AF'T HOIISING RI,EMENT INTRODUCTION Housing Element are consistent with this planned pattern of residential development. A review of the policies, objectives and actions of the other elements indicates that the proposed policies and implementing actions of this Housing Element are also consistent with the intent of these other elements. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT To be effective housing policy must reflect the values of the community and must be the product of participation of a broad base of local interests. Burlingame's Housing Element update program included: two widely advertised public work shops, including direct invitations to all local and county-wide housing providers; an advertised and invitational open study meeting of Planning Commission; public hearings on the preliminary draft before the Planning Commission and City Council prior to initial submittal to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and, following action by HCD, publicly advertised study meetings and public hearings for adoption before both the Planning Commission and City Council. All meetings to develop the 2001-2006 draft of the Housing Element were advertised widely, not only to local residents and organizations but to all non-profit housing providers, many union representatives and members of the development community. Among the agencies and organizations were: the Home Builders Association, Shelter Network, Call Primrose Center, Interfaith Hospitality Network, MidPeninsula Housing Coalition, Center for Independence of the Disabled, Habitat for Humanity, Human Investment Project, Burlingame Lions Club, HIP Housing, Supportive Housing Workgroup of SMC, Green Belt Alliance, NP Housing Association of Northern California, Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County, and the Peninsula Policy Partnership. In addition, 180 Burlingame residents and business people were contacted directly and regularly notified of meetings and opportunities to participate. All documents, workshop workbooks, recordings of workshops, workshop feedback reports, preliminary drafts and final drafts of the Housing Element are available on the city's web site www.burlingame.org, Planning Department Web Page. Through this medium residents can interact directly with staff and the commission regarding the content of any of these documents. PREPARATION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT The Housing Element was prepared in house by City Planning Department staff with technical assistance provided by Jeff Baird of Baird + Driscoll Planning Consultants. Staff has spent more than 500 hours of time preparing the Housing Element at a cost of approximately $47,000.00 (including stafftime, public notices, document printing and consultant fees). The Housing Element programs were developed building on the lessons learned through the implementation of the 1994 Housing Element and by widening the scope of the successful Housing Element programs. City of Burlingame H-7 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY BURLINGAME TODAY The Residents With the turn toward growth, other aspects of the city's resident population have also changed since 1990:1'2 o the population has become more diverse, with almost one-quarter (23.1%) minority; tr an increase in children under 18 to 19.2%, with almost a quarter of these under 5 years ofage in 2000; tr a notable decrease (from 23.6% to 19.l%) in the number of residents over 60; and o with the median age of Burlingame residents of 38.4 years, the city population is still older than that of San Mateo County (36.8 years). Burlingame's resident population only started to grow recently. The City's 28,158 population in 2000 is only 3 percent larger than its 1970 population.r'2 The Association of Bay Area government's projections anticipate, however, that the city will continue to grow, reaching a population of 31,500 by 2010.5 Burlingame's residents live in 12,869 dwelling units, 51% of which are in multiple family structuies and 52o/o of which are rented.e The Citv's household characteristics reflect the more urban flavor of this "suburban" community.l'2 tr the average household size in owner occupied units (single family or multiple family condominium) is 2.58 persons; the average household size of rental units is 1.87 persons; o Population: Over the past 40 years, Burlingame's total population has remained fairly stable, but there has been and increase in diversity of the population and number of children, and a decrease in the elderly population. tr Employment: Burlingame's resident labor force and type of employment has remained stable over the decade; and the median household income has increasedby 6l%. tr Housing Characteristics: The cost of housing in Burlingame has more than doubled in the past decade. More than half the housing stock in Burlingame is over 40 years old, but despite its aging, the city's housing stock is well maintained as exemplified by the number of building permits issued for improvements during the planning period. Key Findings: City of Burlingame H-8 General Plan DRAFT H SING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMLINITY tr the average number persons living in each household in Burlingame is 2.21 , while the average in San Mateo County is 2.74 persons; tr just over half (55%) ofthe households in the city are families; and 7.7Yoof these family households are headed by single females, 45% of whom have children under 18 living with them; o while overcrowding was minimal in Burlingame (1.4 to 1.8%) through the 1980's, in 1990 the census identified 3.7o/o of the city's dwelling units to be overcrowded, (33 units owner occupied and 425 units renter occupied); tr vacancy rate is one measure ofhousing demand, in April 2000 Burlingame's residential vacancy rate was 2.8%, compared to San Mateo County's 2.5%;o and the Bay Area Region's 3.5%; and o in 2000 vacancy rates among owner occupied units was less than I percent (0.4%) and among rental units was 2.2%o, irldicating the strong demand for homeownership, even though the majority ofthe city's housing stock is rental. Like the population, the City's resident labor force and type of employment was stable through most of the 1990's. While the new century has brought indications of growth along with unexpected economic challenges that may significantly affect the validity of the projections, available data provides some insights. O 17,660 of the City's 28,158 residents ar-e employed, with an average unemployment rate for the decade of the 90's of 2.8%;3 tr between 1990 and 2000 the median household income as noted by HCD for San Mateo County increased by 610/o from $46,437 to $74,900 from 1990 to 2000; t5 o the majority of the City's residents were employed in the service (34.8%), trade (22.1%)*d fir*.. (i2.6%) sectors of the i.onorny in 1990;2 tr ABAG projected in Projections 2000, 960 new jobs in Burlingame bV J005, which will result in generating a housing demand for 303 dwelling units; and5 o the City's major employers are Peninsula Hospital (2,555 employees), the city's 6 major hotels (1,525 employees), and two food processing businesses (430 employees); the vast majority of businesses located in Burlingame employ fewer than 100 people.r3 Housing Characteristics The late 1990's was a "boom" period for new construction and residential remodeling in Burlingame. o in 2000 there were 12,869 housing units in Burlingame;e o over two-thirds (65.8%) ofthe city's housing units are more than 40 years old (8,022), built before 1960, and almost a third (32%) arc more than 60 years old (4,04r);e tr between 1994 and 1999, 152 housing units were added to the city's housing stock. Of these new units 102 were in multiple family structures and 2 were single family;e City ofBurlingame H-9 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY o based on building permit activity in 2000, almost 8% of the city's housing stock was issued a building permit to make maintenance repairs or improvements that year alone;e tr the median cost of a single family house in Burlingame doubled from 1990 to 2000 from $302,516 to $811,418; the median cost ofa residential condominium increased from $186,083 to $382,005 in the same time period;8 and O average monthly rent in 2000 was $1,950; the median gross rent reported in the 1990 Census was $729.4 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Fundamental to Burlingame's housing policies and programs is an assessment of the components ofthe city's housing stock and the resident's needs. To determine the size and appropriate programmatic approaches, the needs assessment is divided into segments: household conditions, housing stock conditions, housing needs ofspecial segments of the resident population, and evaluation of potential conversion of "affordable" units to market rate. Household Conditions Households by tenure: The majority of Burlingame residents are renters. In 1990 the census showed 6,457 householders were renters and 5,872 householders were owners. This means that in 1990 ofthe 12,329 occrpied units, 52olo were occupied by renters. Because the family size of those living in rental units is smaller (1.82 persons), only 44%o of the City's 1990 population lived in rental units. The 1990 census also showed that 79Yo of rcnters in the city lived in buildings with 3 or more units;17%o of the renters lived in single-family homes. More than half (55%) the renters in 1990 were between the ages of 25 and 44, and almost half (49.9%) lived alone while 31% lived with one other person. In the 2000 census it is noted that the average household size for rental units in Burlingame is 1.87, which is not a significant change from 1990's 1.82 average household size. The demographics ofhomeowners in 1990 were different from that ofrenters. Over a third (38.6%) were over 65 years ofage and only 8.5%o were 25 to 35 years ofage. Another 21.5% were 35 to 44 years ofage. The average number ofpeople per household among homeowners was 2.48. The 2000 Census shows that the average number ofpeople per household for homeowners has increased to 2.58. City ofBurlingame H-10 General Plan Between 1994 and 1999 Burlingame has added 117 new residential units; of these 3l (27%o) have been multiple family rental units.e Some of the residential condominiums built early in the decade were held by the developers and used as rental income properties; however, this trend stopped early on. Because ofa strong real estate market in the most of the 1990's, it is assumed that the remaining 101 residential condominium units are now owner occupied. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMI]NITY Overcrowding: For those living in the city's rental units in 2000, the average monthly rent was $1,950, compared to a median reported gross rent in the 1990 census of $726.4 This represents an increase in rents of more than 150o/o over the decade. Such increases in rents can result in more people sharing space and an increase in overcrowded units, e.g. more than one person per room in a dwelling unit. However, ifone compares average household size ofowner-occupied and renter-occupied units in 1990 to 2000, the household sizes are similar. ln 1990 the average household size for an owner-occupied house was 2.48 persons compared to 2.58 persons in 2000. In 1990 the average household size for a renter was 1.82 persons and in 2000 it was 1.87 persons. These numbers indicate that overcrowding as a housing problem has not increased significantly in Burlingame over the decade. Using tle measure ofmore than one person per room for overcrowding, there were 458 overcrowded residential units in Burlingame in 1990. Given the similarity of average household size between 1990 and 2000, and projecting this number by the 5% growth in the City's population, 480 seems to be an acceptable target number for overcrowded units for the 2001-2006 Housing Element. Affordability and Eligibility for Housing Assistance Programs: In 2000 the Association ofBay Area Govemments published a projection of mean household income for Burlingame. Based on these figures ($81,700) the incomes of half the households in the city qualifr as moderate income e.g. annual income of 120% of San Mateo County median ($74, 900). In fact the upper limit on the moderate income category is $89,900. Among the groups in San Mateo County whose incomes are commonly below the median income for the county are: Very Low Income Retired Couple (monthly income $1692) Couple, employed full time at minimum wage (monthly income $2167) Preschool teacher (monthly income $ 1935) Low Income Secondary School teacher (monthly income $3,614) Source; State of Califomia, Occupational Employmelt Statistics Survey, Fourth Quarrer 2000. Affordability is a critical issue in housing need. When people cannot afford housing they double up (with more than one family or multiple roommates in a unit) and units become overcrowded or they make long commutes to work from areas where housing is more affordable. Life style is also an issue in affordability. If it takes two adults to pay the rent, and one wishes to stay home with the children; the family may have to move to afford the rent. This may mean a change in employment location as well because the cost of commuting can exceed the difference in rent. A broader look by industries located in Burlingame shows annual average pay for workers. The California Employment Development Department publishes information by county on the employment and wages ofvarious business and industry groups. The most recent of this data for San Mateo County is for 1997. The data is presented by number ofemployees and average annual pay by industry. A review of the data show that a number of industries providing services that are significant in Burlingame's economy have average annual pay for employees in the very H-ll General PlanCity ofBurlirgame DRAF'T HOI]SING EI,EMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY low and lower income level. Types of employment ranking the among very low income level (50% of county median income) are: Hotel/Jvlotel employees Beauticians/Barbers Secretaries Building Maintenance workers Car Rental business employees Amusement and Recreational service workers Nursing care facilities workers Day care providers. Among types of employment ranking in the lower income level (80% of county median income) are: Private elementary and secondary school teacher Dental office workers Car leasing Auto Repair Public elementary and secondary school teachers Income levels are defined by size of household as well as percentage of county median income eamed. In San Mateo County the median income in 2000 was $74, 900. A single low income person could earn $26,200 and a family of four, $37,450 ayear to qualiff. A lower income individual could earn $40,800 a year and a family of four, $58,300 ayear and qualiff. A very low income family of four can afford $936 a month in rent; a single person $655. A lower income family of four can afford $1457 a month in rent; a single person $1020. It is clear that many of the workers we depend on both in terms of the city's economic base and for our quality of life in Burlingame cannot afford housing in the city, rental or homeownership. Moreover, some professions thought of as being "well or highly paid" may have adequate incomes for individuals or couples; but become low or moderate income when stretched to cover the costs of a family of four. For example, the average annual wage in the computer programming business in 2000 was $80,475. If that income were stretched to cover a family of 4, the family would be considered "moderate income" earning less than 120% of the San Mateo County median income of $74,900. Households overpaying: While not located in the heart of Silicon Valley, Burlingame's location with easy access to San Francisco and San Jose, adjacent to San Francisco International Airport, has caused the housing stock to experience an unprecedented increase in owner value and rental cost between 1990 and 2000. The 1990 Census shows the median value of an owner occupied house in Burlingame to be $461,800. The Sustainable San Mateo County yearly report card shows the median sales price of a single-family house in Burlingame in 2000 to be $811,418. This indicates an increase in value of more thanT5o/o over the decade. Rental housing, 52o/o of H-12 General PlanCity of Burlingame DRAFT HOI]SING I,F',MENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY the units in the city, has increased in cost to the renter over the decade by an even gleater proportion. The median gross rent in 1990 was $726 compared to the average monthly rent reported in the Sustainable San Mateo county Report card for the year 2000 of$1,950; a 169% increase. Table H-l - HOUSEHOLDS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSING IN BURLINGAME 2OO() I "Over 65" rows all assume Over 65 homeowners and tenters decline as total Over 65 population declined from 1990 to 2000. Source: Burlingame Planning Depanment 1990 and 2000 Census, Fall 2001 Using U.S. Census data for 1990 and 2000 as shown on the Households Overpaying for Housing in Burlingame 1990 and 2000 Table, it is estimated that 26% of Burlingame's household population is paying more than 30% oftheir gross annual income for housing. More renters, 29% (1,872 households) are overpaying than homeowners,23% (1400). Because of the limited 2000 Census information on housing available, these estimates have been derived from 2000 data available and trends evident in the 1990 census, adjusted by the change in Burlingame's population over 65. Homeowner ProJile Most of the homeowners in Burlingame have lived in the city a long time and purchased their houses many years ago. The 1990 census shows that over a third ofthe owner occupied units in the city have no mortgage; and 57.6Yo ofthe homeowners in the city had lived in their houses more than l0 years. In 1990 a much smaller proportion of the 5872 homeowners had just moved into Burlingame; in 1990, 6.8% of the homeowners had lived in the city less than a year. Another striking fact about homeowners in Burlingame in 1990 was their age. Over a third (38.5%) were over th; age of65. Many ofthese elder residents live on fixed incomes and as housing values rose over the decade, sold their homes. High rents in Burlingame and on the Peninsula 2000 7o Change1990o/o 28,158 5%26,801Totd Populstion t5%-17%t9%4,2875,167Over 65 12,51 I12,329Totrl Occupied Housing Units 48%5,872 48%5,987 t4%6t%4,109 69%3,608Under 65 1,878r 3t%-17%2,264 39%65 and Over 1,400 23%2%r,373 23%Homeowners Overpaying 5%1,166 85%|,228 172l t2%-t7%20765 and Over 6,524 52o/o r%6,457 s2%Renters 87%5,462 85%s,698Under 65 -l7o/ot5%826r t3%65 and Over r,872 29%t%1,853 29%Renters Overpaying 72%fi%|,216 66%t,344Under 65 5291 28%-17%637 34%65 and Over III I City ofBurlingame H-13 General Plan Homeowners 88%Under 65 t5% 995 DR AET Hr)ITSIN': T',I,F,ME',NT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY discouraged many from staying in the area. This is reflected inthe l7%o decrease in Burlingame's elder population over the decade. A small but significant portion of Burlingame's homeowners, often overhoused, are the large families e.g. those families with 5 or more persons per households. The 1990 Census shows that 391 large families owned homes in Burlingame. Projecting the number of large families by the 5% growth in the city's population; there would be 410 such large families owned homes Burlingame in 2000. Renter Profile The dramatic increase in the cost of rental units in Burlingame, a city with 5l% of its housing in multiple family units and 52o/o of its housing units rented, is most notable. As reflected in the change in rents, the city's rental market has also changed its niche, with the median rents in the city in 2000 moving from affordable-to-moderate-income-wage- eamers to market rate. At the time the 1994 housing element was adopted, a large share of rental units in Burlingame were affordable for households with moderate incomes. Since 1994 rents in the city have risen and are no longer as affordable. At today's rents, the typical single individual who rents in Burlingame will have to have an employed roommate to avoid paying more than 30% of their income for housing. over the decade only 3l multiple family rental units were added to the city's housing stock.' Therefore, most ofthis rental increase occurred in the city's older rental housing stock, affecting long-term renters the most. Tenure among renters is strikingly different from homeowners. In 1990, a third (35.9%) had lived in the city less than a year and another third (37.1%) had rented in Burlingame 5years or less. Only 4% had rented housing in the city for twenty years or more. The most cost sensitive group oflong term renters are the elderly population living on fixed incomes. In 1990, 15.4% (992) of the city's renters were over the age of65; and over a quarter (26.6%) of the city's residents received social security income. The elder population ofthe city declined lTYo between 1990 and 2000. One of reasons was the financial incentive offered by the dramatic increase in the value of owner occupied housing. This probably resulted in departure of more of the elderly homeowners than long-term elderly renters. The projected number ofelder renters in the city in 2000, is 826. Of these elder renters 526 are estimated to be overpaying e.g. paying more than 30% of their gross annual income on housing. Another group ofrenters that frequently overpays for housing is larger families, households with more than five members. In 1990 there were 273large family households in Burlingame who were renters. Over the decade the city's population grew by 5Vo. lt is estimated that the number of large family households increased by the same percentage. Further projecting owner and renter proportions based on 1990 trends; it is estimated that 413 ofthese larger families are homeowners and 287 are renters. City ofBurlingame H-14 General Plan DRAFT HOIISING EI,EMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNIry Housing Stock Conditions Housing units by type: There are 12,869 dwelling units in Burlingame (2000 US Census). Of these 5l%, 6,563 units, are multiple family (more than one unit per structure) and 6,306 are detached single family houses on lots varying in size from 3,500 SF to 10,000 SF plus. The typical lot size in the ciry is 5,000 SF. With 48.4o/o of its housing stock in single-family residential units, Burlingame was the only city in San Mateo County with less than one-half its housing stock in single-family units in 1990. Construction in Burlingame since 1990 has been dominated by multiple family units. Between 1994 and 2000, -l l7 dwelling units were added in Burlingame; and all, except 2 of them, were multiple family.v So if anyhing, the predominance of multiple family units in the Burlingame market has increased over the decade. Housing units in need of repair or replacement: Overall the high demand for living units in Burlingame has insured an unusually high level of maintenance for both structures with multiple family units and for owner occupied and rented single-family houses. Over half (57.6%) of the city's multiple family rental housing was built between 1950 and 1979;20% was built before 1939. Given their convenient location to transit terminals with regional access for the great majority of these multiple family units, eleven of these rental units are in high demand as indicated by a 2.2 %o vacancy rate in 2000. These apartment units are generally occupied by single workers or couples who commute to San Francisco or older, retired men and women who wish to live near shopping, regional transportation and community activity centers. All ofthese units have been well maintained, with only a few structural code enforcement actions a year. Single-family housing is in greater demand than apartments in Burlingame. The vacancy rate among owner occupied units in 2000 was less than one percent (0.4%). The great majority (89%) of Burlingame's single-family homes were built before 1970. In fact,46.7Yo were built before 1939; and over three quarters (78.7%) were built before the City's last major single-family tract, the Mills Estates, was developed in 1960. Given their location with good regional access, a superior school system, and sunny weather, all ofthe city's single-family housing units have maintained or increased their value. Because ofthe substantial increase in value over the decade of the 1990's, many owners ofolder houses have reinvested their increased equity back into maintenance and remodeling. In 2000, building permits for maintenance or remodel improvements that required up grade to current building/fire code requirements were issued to 4.8oh of the residential dwelling units in the city. Between 1994 and 1999 a yearly average of 6.250A of the total residential units in the city were issued permits for maintenance, remodel or improvements. The city's code enforcement officer's annual reports indicate that he pursues 3 to 4 residential health and safety nuisance abatements a year including both single and multiple family units. Over a 5 year period this would represent 20 dwelling units with severe s health and safety City ofBurlingame H-15 Geneml Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMLTNITY problems. His experience is that because ofthe size of Burlingame's older population (19%) and the fact that these older residents are frequently the original owner of the structure, these code enforcements are often maintenance issues which arise from age, illness and lack of economic resources of the property owner. Special Needs Groups The state mandates that the housing needs ofspecial groups within the Burlingame resident population also be addressed in the city's housing policies and programs. These groups with special needs have been identified as: the disabled, the elderly, female heads ofhouseholds, the homeless, large families, service workers and public employees, and farm workers. The housing needs ofeach ofthese groups are evaluated below for the purpose of identi$ing appropriate program assistance. Disabled: The group documented in the 1990 census whose housing needs are most likely not to be met by the nursing facilities already provided in Burlingame are the residents with no work disability but with a mobility and self care problem. In 1990 there were 534 such city residents; ofthese 301 were between 16 and 64 year ofage and 233 were over 65 years ofage. The 1990 census also provides some profile ofthe disabled residents in the city; and those residents most likely to be disabled are our elders. In 1990, 2,177 (8.1%) city residents were sufficiently disabled that they could not work and 842 (3.1%) had a disability that impaired their mobility. Of these two groups 60% (1,313) of those who were sufficiently disabled that they could not work were over 65 and 83% (703) of those with a mobility impairment were over 65. Between 1990 and 2000, Burlingame's elder population (65+ years) declined by 880 from 19.2% to 15.2Yo of the city's population. The 2000 population over 65 in Burlingame is 4,287. Because ofthis decline in the number ofresidents over 65, using the 1990 numbers as the basis for quantifuing the care and housing needs of Burlingame's disabled population seems appropriate. Assuming disabled persons do not live together, the city would need 534 accessible living units for disabled persons in the work force. Currently there are 521 nursing home beds in Burlingame, 60 licensed spaces in small group assisted living facilities, 90 assisted living units in a retirement home, and 371 nursing home/convalescent care licensed beds. Two ofthese facilities have been built since 1994 and provide T2licensed beds for Alzheimer patients. These facilities support the needs ofthe city's more fragile, disabled elderly and younger residents who might need transitional assistance from the hospital. Female Heads of Household: The number of female heads of household in Burlingame has decreased over the last ten years, as has the proportion ofthem with school age children at home. Census 2000 shows that 7.7%o of the total population are female heads of household (967 households); with 45Vo (436 households) ofthese having children under 18 years of age at home. City ofBurlingame General PlanH-16 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMUNITY In 1990, female heads of household represented 13.7% of the population (1689 households), and 40% (676) of these had children under l8 years of age living with them. Even with a reduction in the proportion of the city's population that are female heads of household, there remains a need to provide suitable housing for these 967 households. However a priority should be placed on those 436 households with children under 18 living at home. Large Family Households.'Another group that frequently has difficulty finding housing and overpays for it is larger families, e.g. households with five or more members. In 1990 there were 666large family households in Burlingame. Of these, 59Yo were homeowners and 4lo/o renters. Over the decade the city's population grew by 5%.lt is estimated that the number of large family households increased by the same percentage. This would mean that there were 700 large family households in the city in 2000. Further projecting owner and renter proportions based on 1990 trends; it is estimated that 413 of these larger families are home owners and287 are renters. Based on 1990 Census data, it is estimated that23%o of the city's homeowners are overpaying for housing in 2000; and29o/o of the renters are overpaying. Extrapolating these proportions to large family households, 95 large family households who own their own homes are over paying for their housing in 2000. Among renters, 83 large family households who rent in Burlingame in 2000 are overpaying. Table H-2: Estimated Large Family Households and Large Family Households Overpaying by Tenure in Burlingame in 2000 Total Households 12,5ll Overpaying 3,272 (26%) Owner Occupied Households 5,987 Overpaying 1,400 (23%) Large Family Owner Occupied Households 413 (7%) Overpayingt 95 Renter Occupied Households 6,524 Overpaying 1,874 (29%) Large Family Renter Households 287 (ts%) Overpayingz 83 Overpayment estimate is based on proportion of all owner occupied units overpaying projected from 1990 (23%) Overpayment estimate is based on proportion of all renter occupied units overpaying from 1990 (29%). Homeless: The Sustainable San Mateo County's Annual Report 2001 estimates that in 1998 there were 4,545 homeless persons in San Mateo County. Of these homeless, 3,694 were adults and 851 were children. The total number of homeless has not increased significantly since the 1994 count, which totaled 4,499 persons. However, this count does not include "doubled-up" households: those where potentially homeless persons are living with family or friends. The report indicates that the number of doubled-up households in San Mateo County has increased from 613 persons in 1996 to 18,769 persons in 1998.4 2 City of Burlingame H-17 General Plan DRAFT HO G trI,F',MENT PROFILE OF THE COMMLINITY Because the homeless are generally a mobile population, it is difficult to count the number of homeless by city. The Call Primrose Center in Burlingame, an agency that provides social service assistance, estimates that tlere are 5 permanent homeless residents in the Burlingame in 2001 . The 1990 Census recorded 2 visible homeless persons in the city. Data from the San Mateo County Interfaith Hospitality Network, which provides housing for five homeless families with children on a rotating basis at local churches (three in Burlingame) and whose administrative headquarters are in Burlingame, indicates th-at the category with the highest risk of homelessness is female-headed single parent households." They note that the main causes for homelessness are tle break-up of families and the loss of employment. There are no permanent homeless shelters for the more mobile single homeless individuals in Burlingame. However, there is a new north county temporary seasonal shelter for single homeless that operates from December through March in South San Francisco, approximately 2.5 miles to the nofth of Burlingame. The new facility to open 2001 is located on the grounds of the San Francisco Intemational Airport and can accommodate 90 homeless individuals a night. Burlingame contributed $30,000 to the construction of this facility and contributes annually for its operation. ln addition the City of Burlingame makes annual contributions to community groups, located both in Burlingame and elsewhere in the County, which provide services to homeless individuals and families. In the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the city contributed $2,000 to the Call Primrose Center, $2,000 to the Shelter Netrvork of San Mateo County, $3,000 to the Samaritan House, and $7,000 for operating purposes to the north county seasonal shelter.l3 For public service employees the City of Burlingame is a typical example. The median city employee income is $69,564.rr This is 12l% less than the income needed to afford the median priced house for sale in 2001 in Burlingame. A survey by the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance Transportation Action Program done in 2000 found that 77o/o of employees of the city live outside of Burlingame. According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission the average number ofvehicle miles traveled to work in the San Francisco Bay region in 2000 is 18.7 miles. A total of l9% of the City of Burlingame's employees commute from a distance of 20 miles or farther. Cunently, the City of Burlingame offers financial assistance for employees City of Burlingame H-18 General Plan Service llorkers and Public Employees: The major employers in Burlingame are those that rely heavily on service workers. In the private sector the major employers are: 5 major hotels (1,525 employees), Guittard Chocolate (230 employees), Sky Chefs a food processor (200 employees), and Coen Company a gas/oil bumer manufacturer (111 employees). In the public sector the major employers are: Peninsula Hospital a public/private medical center (2,555 employees), the City of Burlingame (281 employees), and the Burlingame Elementary School District (230 employees). Burlingame also has a community downtown commercial center and two neighborhood shopping centers that support the city's residents. These areas are populated by small independent and chain stores, which are dependent on local service workers. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMML]NITY using mass hansit to commute. As is true of other public employers in the City, Burlingame does not offer any housing assistance for employees. In San Mateo County, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartrnent is 62% more than the monthly income made by a minimum wage eamer.3'a Based on figures from the Employment Development Department, workers in the employment categories that form the core of Burlingame's economy may be eaming an hourly wage that makes them unable to afford housing. For example, the average annual pay in 1999 for a person employed in the retail trade in San Mateo County is 526,614. This annual pay places a one-person family in the retail industry in the very low-income category as defined by HCD. In the services industry, the average annual income in 1999 was $57,309. This annual pay places a family of four with a single wage earner in the services industry in the low-income category as defined by HCD. Based on housing costs in San Mateo County, such a family could only afford to rent the average priced one-bedroom apartment. First-time homebuyers in the service and public sectors may be also excluded from the housing market in San Mateo County because of the high down payment required. A median priced home in Burlingame would require a 20% down payment of $162,283. San Mateo County offers several programs for first time home buyers, including a second mortgage loan program (START) and a mortgage credit certificate program (MCC). rr However, the START program was initiated in 1994 with first-time funds and is currently inactive until the initial qualifiers repay enough ofthe loan money to re-open the program. The MCC program requires that the purchase price ofa home cannot exceed $269,000, where in Burlingame the median price ofa condominium in 2000 was $382,005. Housingfor Farm workers:There are no farms in Burlingame. The definition of farming also includes those working in forestry and wholesale horticultural businesses. While there are no wholesale horticultural or forestry businesses that employ manual laborers in Burlingame, the 1990 census shows that 1% of the city's residents declared their employment to be associated with farming, forestry or wholesale horticultural businesses. This low percentage, combined with the fact that Burlingame has no agricultural lands or farm labor housing within or adjacent to its incorporated limits, indicates that the number of actual farm workers in Burlingame is very small and, therefore, no there is no need for farm worker housing. AT-RISK ASSISTED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Inventory of At-Risk Units Section 65583 (a) (8) ofthe State Govemment Code requires an analysis of assisted housing developments that are eligible because of the expiration of Federal loan limitations to change from low-income to market rate housing during the next terr years. In Burlingame, there are currently no locally subsidized units at risk. The one apartment project financed with mortgage City of Burlingame H-19 General Plan DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMRNT PROFILE OF THE COMML'NIry revenue bonds was converted to market rate housing in the 1980's. No additional mortgage revenue bonds have been issued in the city nor has the city undertaken any other housing programs that rely on funding which would allow projects to be converted to market rate units in the future. PROJECTED HOUSING NEEDS State law requires that a housing element quantiff existing and projected housing needs for persons of all income levels within each community, including the community's share of the regional housing need by income level. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is responsible for preparing estimates of local and regional housing need for additional units based on factors prescribed by State Law (Section 65884 or Article 10.6). The factors included in the division of the regional housing need into individual community assignment are: market demand for housing, availability of suitable sites and public-facilities, commuting pafferns, housing type and tenure, and housing needs of farm workers. In addition ABAG looks at regional and local vacancy rates and at housing values and rents as indicators of market demand. Household projections are based on employment opportunities, availability of sites and commuting patterns. Type ofhousing is based on census data and regional projections. Existing Housing Needs Existing housing need for the addition of new units to Burlingame's housing stock includes two factors: (1), the number of additional units needed to replace substandard structures or substandard living conditions generally marked by overcrowding and overpayment; and (2) the number of units additional units required in Burlingame to insure the city meets its regional housing share responsibility. Substandard Structures The housing needs assessment documents that while Burlingame is built out at this time and the city's housing stock is aging, there is a high demand for housing reflected by both the cost and vacancy rate. The result has been that overall the city's housing stock is well maintained. It is estimated that since 1994,40o of the single family housing stock has been demolished and replaced, had a major addition or been significantly maintained (wiring, plumbing, roofing, etc.). Based on past code enforcements for health and safety, it is estimated that the five year housing need for replacement of dilapidated and/or unsafe dwellings in Burlingame is 20 units. Substandard Living Conditions The housing needs assessment defines the scope of local households in need of housing assistance in 2000. Since these residents are living in Burlingame not all of these needs can be met by new residential construction. Moreover, because of the size of these needs, the city must City of Burlingame H-20 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMLTNITY establish target numbers for the five year work program. The two major conditions that result in substandard living conditions and/or life style are overpayment for housing and overcrowding. In many cases these two are related, since renters who lived alone may need to take in roommates in order to afford their housing or relatives who cannot afford rent may move in with a homeowner. Overpayment: Households overpaying, paying more than 30oZ of their income for housing, are more difficult to estimate because of the lack of current census data. Based on 1990 data projected for the increase in households, it is estimated that there were 3,272 households overpaying for housing in Burlingame in 2000. This represents 26.5% of the city's housing stock. More than half (1,872) of these households were renters. Among the most economically challenged ofthese overpaying households are the elderly on fixed incomes. It is estimated in 2000 that there were 172 homeowners over the age of65 and 826 renters over the age of65 overpaying for housing in Burlingame. Special Needs: Often the households that are overpaying and are overcrowded, include members of other groups which have special housing needs. The city's housing implementation progmm should address these specific needs as well. Because of the absence of2000 Census data the numbers of these households in Burlingame in 2000 have been estimated based on 1990 Census data. It is estimated that in 2000 there will be 534 households with at lease one disabled member; 700 households with more than 5 persons; and 967 households headed by a single female, 436 of them with children under the age of 18. Special programs will be needed to address the housing needs of these groups. Community Assignment: Regional Housing Share State law requires that each community consider the housing needs ofpeople ofall income levels. In addition, State law requires that the regional housing needs should be balanced throughout the region so that individual communities will not be impacted with relatively high proportions of lower income housing. H-21 General Plan Overcrowding: In 2000 it was estimated that 458 dwelling units were overcrowded in Burlingame. This represents 3.5% of the city's dwelling units. ABAG has the responsibility ofprojecting the regional housing needs and identifoing Burlingame's share for the 2001-2006 period based on the factors identified in State law. The five year housing need numbers include market rate housing as well as units for those with lower incomes. The projected need number is the number ofnew dwelling units needed in Burlingame to insure that the total expected regional household gro*,th's housing need is met. The projected regional housing need number for the planning period for Burlingame is 565 dwelling units. The city's obligation includes addressing both space for 565 new units and for units with households City ofBurlingame DRAF'T NI,EMENT PROFILE OF THE COMMI.JNITY among the 565 with different incomes. Burlingame's housing regional assignment for 2001-2006 by income category is: Table H-3 - Pro ected Need Income Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, letter ABAG Executive Certification of the Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) Appeal Process and Final RHND Allocation, March 23,2001. The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has developed an income formula for determining eligibility for Federally funded housing projects. These same standards are used by the State of California and ABAG for determining householder income for below market rate housing. The eligibility categories are defined by percentage the family earns (adjusted by family size) of the median income in the county where they reside. The median income in San Mateo County for 2000 is $74,900. Households earning less than the county median income are determined to be eligible for housing assistance. The income limits for eligibility for 2000 are presented by number of persons per household. Table H-4 - Federal Income Limits *Median Income standard is based on a family of four. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HIJD) limits for income categories for low and very low income households, FY 2000 limits on March 9, 2000. The income standard includes the requirement that households whose incomes are below the county median should not pay more than 30 percent of their incomes for housing. In areas like San Mateo County, where housing prices have been inflating over the past decade or more, finding safe and sanitary housing units within the reach of individuals and families whose incomes are below the median is difficult; and overpayment is an important issue in Burlingame's housing market. No. Units PercentIncome Category t9ll0Very Low l056Low t57 28Moderate 242 43Above Moderate (market rate) 565 100Total Current need 75Average Yearly Need NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Very Low Income 26,200 29,950 33.700 37,450 40,450 43,450 46,450 49,450 Lower Income 40,800 46,650 52,500 58,300 63,000 67,650 72,300 77,000 Median Income 52,450 59,900 67,400 74,900r,80,900 86,900 92,900 98,850 Moderate Income 62,950 71,900 80,900 89,900 97.100 104,300 I I1,500 I18,650 City of Burlingame H-22 General Plan DRAFT HO (l F',I,[',MF,NT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES CONSTRAINTS TO DEVELOPMENT Governmental Constraints 1. Land Use Regulations General Plan: Burlingame's General Plan contains nine elements including all seven mandated by the State. The General Plan establishes land uses and land use densities for the City of Burlingame. A spectrum ofuses is found in Burlingame, ranging from residential to industrial. Each land use identified in the General Plan corresponds with a zoning diskict which implements that land use and establishes criteria for the development ofthe use. Residential densities and corresponding zoning designations are as follows: single family uses (up to 8 dwelling units per acre) R- 1 ; medium density (duplex at 9 to 20 units per acre) R-2; medium high (21 to 50 units per acre); and high density (51 plus units per acre) R-4. There are two commercial land uses that allow residential uses above the ground floor, those are the uses designated as shopping and service and service and special sales. The implementing zoning districts for these land uses are the C- 1 and C-2 zoring districts respectively. Residential group care facilities for the elderly are allowed in the C-l and C-2 districts, as well as the R-4 and C-3 zoning districts. These areas are located near major transportation corridors in the City and are ideal locations for high-density housing. Zoning Ordinance; The City of Burlingame has a zoning ordinance that sets forth requirements that can affect the type, appearance and cost ofhousing built in Burlingame. The zoning ordinance sets the standards for lot size, use, lot coverage, floor area ratio, setbacks, height, open o Burlingame's zoning regulations and development fees are comparable to other communities on the Peninsula. E Because of our location at the edge of San Francisco Bay, the regulations of outside agencies have come to play an increasing role which increases both processing times and conskuction costs. E Because communities on the Peninsula are substantially built out, land and construction costs drive up the cost ofhousing. tr The city has been aggressive in implementing local conservation and recycling legislation as well as disseminating information on energy conservation programs offered by other agencies. Key Findings: City of Burlingame H-23 General Plan DR r.T TIOITSINC F',I ,E',MRNT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES space and parking. In Burlingame, there are four residential zoning districts and five commercial zoning districts, two of which allow residential development above commercial uses, and one which has been specifically created as a mixed use zoning district (C-R), allowing all multi- family residential or mixed commercial/residential use. The three commercial zoning districts which allow mixed use are close to the City's major transportation corridors, encouraging residential development in these locations. The minimum lot size in Burlingame is 5,000 square feet. There are some areas in the City, mostly hillside areas, where the minimum lot size is 7,000 and 10,000 square feet. There are also some nonconforming 3,000 and 4,000 square foot parcels in the City's older subdivisions. The lot coverage allowed for single-family development is 40o/o; and 50olo coverage is allowed for multiple family development. Lot coverage on corner lots in R-3 and R-4 zoning districts is increased to 60Yo. Side setbacks requirements are based upon lot width ranging from 4 to 7 feet, and are required for all residential developments. The minimum front and rear setback requirement is 15 feet. Private and shared open space are required only for residential condominium developments. These requirements are on a per unit basis, with 75 square feet of private open space required per unit, and 100 square feet of common open space required per unit. Floor area ratio pertains only to single-family projects. Floor area ratio is based on a formula that varies by lot size, and takes into account the location of the lot (interior or corner), and the type ofgarage (attached or detached). Unlike other cities in San Mateo County, over half of Burlingame's housing stock is multi- family units. The densities of the multi-family units vary from 20 units per acre, to over 50 units per acre. Except for the addition of residential condominium requirements for multiple family units in the 1970's, the zoning regulations for multi-unit developments have not changed much over the years. There is no design review required for multi-family dwellings. Burlingame does not have density limits (units per acre) established by zoning in the residential zoning districts. The number of parking spaces that can be accommodated on a site is the ultimate determination of the maximum number of units on a multiple family zoned lot. The parking requirement in Burlingame is based upon the number of bedrooms, per unit. There is one and one-half spaces required for each studio or one-bedroom unit; two parking spaces required for a two bedroom unit; two and one-half spaces required for a three or more bedroom unit. Guest parking is required only for multiple family condominium projects, the number of spaces required is based upon the project size and can be taken from the required parking. Thus parking is one of the major limiting factors in developing high-density housing in Burlingame. Often parking in below grade structures is used to increase the dwelling unit densities in multi-family developments. The Code allows group residential facilities for the elderly to be built with25oh of the required parking per unit. There are currently no provisions for reduced parking for multi- family development near mass transit. H-24 General PlanCity ofBurlingame DRAFT HOUSIN G EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES The height limit for residential structures in the R-l and R-2 zoning districts is two and one-half stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. The R-3 zoning district has a height limit of four stories or 55 feet and the R4 zoning district is six stories or 75 feet in height. A conditional use permit is required for any multiple family structure over 35 feet in height. This height review also pertains to structures in the C-l and C-2 zoning districts. At the north end of the City near the new BART station in Millbrae, there is an aviation easement imposed by ttre FAA and SFO Airport. The maximum height in this area is limited to 60 feet for air traffic safety. A second unit amnesty program has recently been adopted by the City Council to legalize existing second units on single family zoned (R-l) lots. The program was adopted for two years, until June 7 , 2003 . Burlingame first adopted a zoning code in 1 92 I when second units were allowed on R-l zoned lots. In January 1954, R-l district regulations were revised to allow only one dwelling on an R-l zoned lot. Many of the second units were built during the housing crisis associated with World War II. The program seeks to retain these existing units as a legal part of Burlingame's housing stock. They are usually smaller, more affordable units that are ideal for single or elderly people with limited incomes. The intent of the program is also to make these units safe and sanitary for current and future tenants. In order for a second unit to qualifu for the amnesty program it must meet certain criteria, including being able to conform to the requirements of the California Health and Safety Code. The amnesty process is primarily administrative and includes an inspection by the Building Inspector and notification to neighbors within 100 feet of the property. Appeals are resolved by the Planning Commission. If all the criteria are met and no appeals are filed, the unit is granted armesty. With the $ant of amnesty for a second unit, some limitations are placed on the property: including future expansion of the second unit and a requirement that one of the two units on-site is owner occupied. Single Family Residential Design Review: ln 1998 the City Council adopted Ordinance 1602 implementing design. review for second story additions, new construction and first floor additions which involve substantial construction in the R-l zoning district; design review is based on compliance with five design criteria. The intent ofthe guidelines is to preserve the original and unique pattems ofthe distinct residential neighborhoods in Burlingame. There is no design review for multiple family residential projects. 2. Building Codes The City of Burlingame applies the 1998 Califomia Building Code (CBC) and Califomia Fire Code (CFC) to review minimum health and safety standards for residential and commercial construction projects. There are local amendments that require more restrictive standards for certain items. The local amendments that apply to housing include a requirement for the installation of automatic fire sprinkler in all residential developments larger than 5,000 square feet in area and for structures taller than three stories. For all structures, residential included, all storm water roof drainage must be collected and conveyed to the public storm water system. There are seismic standards applied, and extra engineering may be required for structures in the City ofBurlingame H-25 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES hillside areas. Because Building and Fire Code standards are established for life safety reasons, it is not reasonable to consider not complying with the Code in order to reduce housing costs. Burlingame enforces energy conservation standards enacted by the State. The standards may increase initial construction costs, but will reduce household costs over the long term by reducing energy costs. Burlingame has one code enforcement officer. Most of the code enforcement in Burlingame is complaint driven, but there is some active enforcement initiated by the code enforcement officer based upon observation. It is unlikely that the code enforcement in Burlingame would have a negative impact on the long term affordability of the City's housing stock. 3. NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Requirements Burlingame is located at the foot and along the east side of the coastal ridge between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay. Four creeks drain the area directly into San Francisco Bay. For these reasons, runoff and water quality are important considerations in development and construction. The Clean Water Act of 1972 prohibits the discharge of stormwater into United States waters unless the discharge is in compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). To meet its mandate from the State, the City of Burlingame, has joined with the other cities in San Mateo County, to obtain a regional discharge permit from the State Water Quality Control Board (SWQCB) for stormwater water discharge. In order to reduce non-point pollution sources, each construction project is required to implement "best management practices" on job sites to minimize erosion, stop contaminated run-off and control construction site pollution. NPDES requirements also encourage site planning including swales, detention ponds and other design elements that can be incorporated into project design to reduce storm water run-off and contamination. The City of Burlingame requires all stormwater run-off to be collected and channeled into a public storm water system. It is expected that with the City's permit renewal in 2003, there will be more restrictions on private developers during construction to include residential development. These new requirements may increase the cost and timing of construction. The impact of the current requirements will require additional site planning, post construction controls and maintenance that will likely result in additional time and expense to developers. 4. On and Off-Site Improvements On and off-site improvements also add to the cost of development projects, and are usually required before a building permit can be signed off for occupancy of a structure. Residential developments in the City of Burlingame are required to meet City standards for curb cuts, which is a width not exceeding2l% of the lot dimension or 16 feet for a two-car garage. As stated above, all storm water roof drainage must be collected and conveyed to the public storm water City of Burlingame H-26 General Plan D F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES system. Sewer laterals are required to be tested upon sale and replaced all the way from the house to the City clean out for all new residential buildings. For residential projects, the City's urban reforestation ordinance requires that one landscape tree be planted on-site for each 1,000 square feet offloor area. For properties along El Camino Real (State Route 82), sidewalk and curb cut changes require Caltrans approval. 5. Environmental Requirements Burlingame is mandated to follow the procedures set forth in tle California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Since two square miles of the City is under San Francisco Bay water, the City has a substantial bay edge. Four creeks drain the coastal range to the bay thrcugh the City. Sites that have unusual topography and/or sensitive habitat may require in-depth review and special studies to evaluate the environmental impacts ofa proposed project. This can add additional costs to a project. Residential properties containing a creek that are proposing significant alterations or culverting ofa creek are also required to obtain approval from the Califomia Departrnent of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Potential development sites with sensitive habits, endangered species, or significant environment problems are generally not recommended sites for affordable housing. For example, steeply sloping sites in the Burlingame Hills that may be available for housing would be quite expensive to develop because ofgeotechnical problems. 6. Fees and Exactions The costs involved with development in the City of Burlingame include planning and building plan check and permit fees; utility service fees, school fees and a recycling fee. The City does not have park dedication fees or bedroom tax, as do many cities. It has been the policy ofthe City Council to subsidize the Planning permit process to encourage residents to apply for and receive permits before they begin construction. As a result Burlingame's planning processing fees remain among the lowest in San Mateo County. City ofBurlingame H-27 Geleral PIan DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Planning Fees: The Planning Department fees required for residential development include the following: Table H-5 - Source: Burlingame Planning Department, 2001 Burlingame's Planning Department is not funded by fees, rather by general funds. The cost of planning is subsidized in Burlingame, with the fees collected for projects not nearly covering the cost of staff time to process such projects. A comparison of residential planning fees from other cites in San Mateo County is listed below. Table H-6 -fees for other cities in San Mateo Fees Application Type T.oning District Fee Desigl Review Fee R-l districts only $200 Desiga Review Deposit R-l districts only $500 Variances R-l and R-2 $ 100 Variances all other districts sl50 Special Permits all districts $200 Conditional Uses all districts $200 Rezoning all districts $200 Minor Modification & Hillside Area Permit all districts $100 Initial Study all districts $s0 Categorical Exemption all districts $25 Negative Declaration all districts $ 100 Negative Declaration With Responsible Agency all disticts $s00 Condominium Permit residential disnicts all other districts $ r00 $150 Public Noticing R-l and R-2 districts all other districts $3s $60 Environmental Impact Report all districts $ 7,500 deposit Design Review Variance Conditional Uses Initial Study Negative Declaration Belmont s2,537 $2,536 $2,536 s2,097 $795 (mitigated 130% ofcost of contract) Burlinqame $200 + $500 deposit sl00 $200 s50 $100 Daly City $800 $300 + $100 per acre $300 + g199 p.. acre st45 $350 or actual cost + 25% overhead Foster City $150 + fee based upon scope ofwork $200 $200 $ l2s $125 or actual cost Millbrae new constr $750 + supplemental cost (min $32 l.5o) room add $540 + supplemental cost (min of$230) $335 $335 $87 $332 + 105% of actual cosV $2,150 + l05o/o of actual cost City of Burlingame H-28 General Plan b - t b - - - DRAF'T E',I ,F',MRNT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Design Review Variance Conditional Uses Initial Study Negative Declaration Redwood City $50 (l-3 units) $250 + $25lunit $400 new res. $200 res alt $400 N/A $1,500 San Bruno s425 $600 $s00 $18.7s s400 San Carlos $545 new construction $55 minor alt s545 $630 N/A $1,135 San Mateo $1,909 $218 $218 $1,909 + consultant fees $1,909 + consultant fees South San Francisco $215 s38s s350 $100 + consultant fees $75 + consultant fees Source: Burlingame Planning Department, 2001 Building Fees: Building permit fees are charged on a sliding scale that is based upon the valuation of the project, plus plan check fees. The estimated valuation of a project is checked against a minimum valuation of $102.18' per square foot for residential development. The basic plan check fee is 65% of the building permit fee. The energy plan check fee (when applicable) is an additional 25yo of the building permit fee. The basic fee for electrical, plumbing and mechanical permits is $25 dollars, with additional fees charged on a line item basis. Recycling Fees: Ordinance No. 1645 was adopted in December 2000, by the Burlingame City Council in order to meet the goals of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which requires all California cities and counties to divert 50% of waste they generate away from landfills. The City's recycling ordinance requires that600/o (by weight) of all waste generated from demolition and new construction be reused and/or recycled, and that a minimum of 25% of structural material (excluding concrete, asphalt and dirt) must be recycled. Prior to permitting, applicants must complete a recycling and waste reduction form, then a City employee makes a site visit to veriff the estimated waste anticipated to be generated by the project. The applicant is then required to pay a deposit at the rate of $50 per ton of waste generated. For example, if a project is estimated to generate l0 tons of debris, the deposit would be ($50 X 10 tons) $500, and 5 tons is required to be recycled. All recycling, reuse and disposal must be documented by receipts, weight tags or other records. If the recycling goal is met, the full deposit is refunded, however if the recycling goal is not met only a proportionate amount of the deposit will be returned. Some waste materials can be sold by the developer to offset his/her additional cost of removal caused by recycling. Public Worlcs: Public Works fees associated with housing development typically include sewer connection fees which are $143 for a single family dwelling or duplex and $109 per unit for multi-family structures. Water meter and service connection fees can range from $1,050 to $2,575 depending on the size of the service and meter required. Sidewalk and special I The basis for valuations are set annually utilizing building valuation date published in "Building Standard" magazine, the offrcial publication of the International Conference of Building Officials. City of Burlingame H-29 General Plan DR F'T HOI ISINC Ti',I,F',MI,NT HOUSING DEYELOPMENT ISSUES encroachment fees are $10 for properties in the R-l and R-2 zoning districts and $50 for multi- family zoning districts. Fees for street frontage improvements conrmonly associated with housing development, including sidewalk, curb, gutter and curb drain modifications, are $25 for changes to 150 square feet or less. School Fees: Two school districts serve Burlingame: the Burlingame Elementary School District and the San Mateo Union High School Disrict. School fees are collected to offset costs of rehabilitation and maintenance ofschool buildings, with 60% ofthe fees collected going to the elementary school district and 40% to the high school district. Fees are collected on all new construction projects and residential remodels in Burlingame that add 500 square feet or more. Residential school development fees for three stories or less are $ 1.93 per square foot, and commercial and residential project greater than three stores are charged $ .31 per square foot. 7. Process and Permitting Procedures Planning Process Single Family Construction Burlingame adopted interim single family residential design review guidelines in 1998 for new single family construction and second story additions in the R-l zoning district. The process was revised slightly to include first floor additions involving substantial construction and to expedite processing times, and was made permanent in April 2000. The intent ofthe guidelines is to preserve the original and unique pattems ofdistinct neighborhoods through consistency of character in individual homes to allow protection of each homeowner's investment when future projects are initiated. The process requires that all qualifuing projects go before the planning commission in a design review study meeting, with notice to all neighbors within 300 feet. The project is either refened to a design review consultant or the project is moved forward on the Planning Commission calendar for action. The Planning Commission action is appealable to City Council. The average processing time for a project that is not refened to a design review consultant is 56 days. Approximately 26% of the projects requiring design review are sent to a design review consultant. The average processing time for these projects is approximately 162 days. These average processing times include "out of court" time in which the applicant is revising drawings. Design review does not apply to duplex or multiple family residential development. In addition to design review, applicants may request exceptions to the zoning code in the form of variances, conditional use and special permits. A variance is generally a measurable standard, such as parking space dimension or front setback dimension. Special permits and conditional use permits are more discretionary. The average processing times for these types ofapplications is about 8 to 10 weeks (56 to 70 calendar days). This time line is generally driven by legal noticing requirements and planning City ofBurlingame H-30 GeneEl Plan DRAF'T HOI]SING ,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Commission hearing availability. The Burlingame Planning Commission meets the second and fourth Monday of each month. All applications require two meetings before the Commission; one for design review study and one for action. Three weeks is added to the review time if a decision is alpealed to the City Council because of the requirements to comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act provisions. There are two administrative processes in Burlingame: minor modifications and hillside area construction permits. Minor modifications are similar to variances, but are for minor encroachments beyond the established development regulations. For example, you may seek a minor modification rather than a variance for a 1 foot extension into the required side yard. In the hillside areas of the City, any construction requires a hillside area construction permit. The intent of this process is to allow opportunity to review construction for its affect on existing distant views from inside structures on nearby properties. Administrative permits are noticed to immediate neighbors (within 100 feet). If there are no appeals within 7 days, the permit is issued administrativeiy. If a neighbor wishes to appeal the project it moves on to full review with a public hearing Lefore thePlanning Commission. An administrative permit review which is not appealed takes about 16 days. Multiple Family Construction Residential Condominium permits: All proposals for condominiums, residential or commercial, require a condominium permit. The Planning Commission and City Council must approve the proi..t based on the following criteria: conformity with zoning regulations and General Plan iensities, its effect on surrounding community, impact on schools, parks, public utilities, streets, traffic, and submittal of legal tentative parcel map approved by the City Engineer. Condominium projects must also meet certain development criteria such as common and private open space, as well as greater setbacks than is required for apartments. Apartment Development: lf anapartment project meets all zoning code requirements, the process can be ministerial and will only require review by the Planning Commission if environmental review is also required. There are no requirements for common and private open space in apartment projects. The California Environmental Quality Act allows categorical exemptions for projects involving four or less units, and for larger infrll projects which meet certain criteria. For those larger developments which do not meet the infill criteria, the environmental review process may add time to development projects, as discussed above. plan Check: The City of Burlingame offers a parallel plan check process which allows applicants by their choice to submit construction plans to the Building Department while they are simultaneously going through the zoning review process. The intent of providing this option to the public is to &pedite the review process. However, there is a risk involved with this process City of Burlingame H-31 General Plan DRAFT HOUSIN G NI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES in that plan drawings and engineering and structural calculations may be required to be redone should the action ofthe Planning Commission cause a substantial change to the project. Additional plan check fees are charged for revised plans. There is a 7 day performance standard for Planning Departrnent review ofbuilding permit applications. Public Wortrs: Since Burlingame operates its own wastewater heafinent plant, and it must meet the operating requirements of the San Francisco Region Water Quality Control Board, it is a part ofthe City's permit that a sewer lateral test be completed prior to the sale ofa house that is 25 years old or older and before renovations occur where 2 or more plumbing fixtures are added. Typically these tests cost $20, in addition to any repairs or line replacement required. Non-Governmental Constraints 1. Environmental Geotechnical/Norse.' The topography in Burlingame goes from the waters of San Francisco Bay to the coastal range foothills. Four creeks drain from the coastal range, through the City, to the bay. In Burlingame the face of the coastal range is divided into large-lot single-family dwellings. Due to the steep slopes and shallow underground streams, some areas are lulnerable to land slides during the wet weatler. The hillside area is divided into larger lots (10,000 SF minimum). Developments on these lots require additional seismic and structural engineering features. The flat land areas in Burlingame are subject to a high water table and, in some areas to short term flooding. These constraints increase the cost ofbuilding housing in some areas' Certain areas of the City are also subject to high noise levels. These areas include sites close to US 101, the Cal Train rail line, and areas subject to over flight from planes departing San Francisco Intemational Airport. A larger area ofthe flat land and upward sloping area at the north end of the City are also subject to back blasts (low frequency) noise from departing airplanes. Housing development in these areas will require noise mitigation, which also adds to increased housing costs. 2. Land and Construction Costs Housing and land costs within San Mateo County have dramatically increased since the mid 1990's. This is due in large part to the rapid growth ofhigh+echnology businesses in the Bay Area region, particularly on the San Francisco Peninsula. The increase in the employment and housing demand has been more dramatic than anytime in the past twenty years, with housing costs rising much faster than household income levels. Until recently, the cost of land has steadily increased, with a l5olo price increase from 1999 to 2000. However with the loss ofjobs since January 2001 in the high+ech sector, it is forecast that sales price growth in the Bay Area will slow to 3Yo to 4Vo' this year. 2 Marcus & Millichap, news release April 30, 2001 City ofBurlingame H-32 General Plan D r.T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES In general lots are small in Burlingame with the typical lot between 5000 and 6000 SF. There are fewer than 30 acres of vacant undeveloped land in the City, and most new development will occur by re-use of already developed land. It has become common practice to see proposals that include the demolition of a single family dwelling and reconstruction of a larger single family dwelling on the lot. Lots with old dilapidated structures have been sold in the last year for as much as $680,000, with the intention of demolishing the structure and building a new single family dwelling. Many of these proposals are made by developers who intend to market these homes on the high-end real estate market. The sale price ofthese speculative homes commonly exceeds the million dollar mark. Due to the scarcity of vacant lots in Burlingame there has been a net gain of two single family dwellings in the City of Burlingame between 1994-2001. The largest increase in residential units has been in the multi-family zoned areas. Between 1994 and 1999, l15 multi-family units were added to the City's housing stock. Forty percent ofthese new multi-unit developments were on parcels that previously contained single family dwellings. The cost of construction for residential development has dramatically increased since the mid 1990's as well. The economic boom in the technology industry sparked a large demand for office space in the Bay Area in the late 1990's. The demand for general contractors as well as subcontractors became so $eat, that many people with residential projects had a hard time finding and retaining contractors. This drove the cost of construction up significantly, for both single family and multi-family development. Building construction costs are estimated by the Building Department to be $102.183 per square foot for single family residential development. 3. Financing and Affordability The median price for a condominium in San Mateo County in 2000 was $360,000, an increase of 80% over the 1991 price of$200,000. The median price for a single family detached home in San Mateo County in 2000 was $600,000. The average price for a single family detached home in Burlingame in 2000 was 8l 1,418, and in 1990, the average cost was $302,516. This represents a 149Yo increase in the average home price since 1990. Rents increased 957o since 1991 when the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in San Mateo County was $1,000, and in 2001 it is now $1,950. The median household incomes for San Mateo County increased 61% since 1990, from $46,438 to $74,900. Assuming a 20% down payment, a $811,418 home financed for 30 years al7.l4%oa would require a monthly payment of approximately $4,374, and an annual household income of about $233,000. According to census data the median household income for San Mateo County in 2000 was $74,900. I The basis for valuations are set annually utilizing building valuation date published in "Building Standard" magazine, the ollicial publication ofthe Intemational Conference ofBuilding Officials. a Califomia Association ofRealtors, July 25,2001 City ofBurlingame H-33 General Plan DR F'T HOTISING RI,RMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES In San Mateo County "affordable" housing is defined as that with a contract rent or price affordable to low and moderate income households, based upon: rent not exceeding 30% of monthly income and monthly mortgage payment not exceeding33% of gross monthly income. In the second quarter of 2001 sales activity of homes has slpped, however the median home price in the Bay Area is still increasing, but at a slower rate). The home sales and rental market are both normalizing after experiencing extreme growth in the past several years. Although mortgage rates have dropped significantly from 8.29% in June 2000 to 7.14% in June 2001 for fixed 30-year mortgage and from 7.24% in June 2000 to 5.80% in June 2001 for an adjustable mortgageo, because of the high house prices ownership is still out of reach for most County residents. Housing Funding Opportunities Because the City's population is less than 50,000, Burlingame does not receive Federal housing assistance money (Block Grant/CDBG) directly. However, the City does have an administrative agreement with San Mateo County, which is the recipient of the CDBG finds for the unincorporated county and all the jurisdictions too small to receive Block Grant funds directly. Although the City of Burlingame does not offer assistance directly to first time homebuyers; the City does participate with the County consortium in a Community Development Block Grant program funded by the Federal Government, which provides some first time homebuyer programs. The San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development is the lead agency for the Consortium. San Mateo County HOME Consortium receives federal block grants from which they fund housing projects. The Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is one of the more active loan programs operating in the county. The participating cities, along with the unincorporated area of the County compete for funding from this grant. The local jurisdiction in which a project is funded, must match 25%o of the Federal funds. Projects seeking funding from the block grant must complete a request for proposal (RFP) that is reviewed by the HOME Program Review Commiffee that formulates recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors makes the final decision on which projects are to be funded. The other main programs operating in the County are the START program and the Mortgagee Credit Certificate Program (MCC). The START program began in 1994 with 3 million dollars from the County General Fund and another 2 million from a HUD grant. It is a second mortgage loan program that will provide a loan for up to 25Yo of the purchase price, not to exceed $286,100 or $35,000, whichever is less, at a 3o/o interest rate for 30 years. There are no 5 Califomia Association of Realtors, July 25,2001 6 California Association of Realtors, July 25,2001 City of Burlingame H-34 General Plan - E'T Irr|ITSIN( T',I ,F',MRNT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES payments or accrued interest for the first five years. These funds were loaned out to 125 purchasers that met the program requirements. All original funding has been exhausted and the program is now awaiting additional funding. The maximum income of applicants for this program can not exceed 120% of the median income (moderate income). Another County program for first time homebuyers is the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program (MCC). This program is a tax credit certificate that is issued by San Mateo County Department of Housing and Community Development to eligible homebuyers. The certificate allows a tax credit equal to l5%o of the annual mortgage interest paid on a home loan, with the remaining 85% of the mortgage interest still eligible to be taken as an itemized deduction. With this benefit, new homeowners may wish to adjust their Federal tax withholdings, resulting in more spendable income each month. In order to qualiff for this program, applicant's total gross household income cannot exceed $57,600 for a 1 or 2 person household, and$66,240 for a 3 or more person household. The purchase price can not exceed $269,500 for an existing dwelling or $369,100 for a newly constructed dwelling. Due to the high cost of housing in Burlingame, it may be difficult to find a property that would meet the criteria for the above stated programs. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission has recently created a planning grant program called Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC). New residential development withint/tto %mile of transit terminals is targeted with this program. Planning grants are available under this program to provide funding for small-scale transportation projects such as streetscapes and pedestrian, transit and bicycle oriented improvements for compact housing developments to help revitalize local communities. MTC offers up to $75,000 per project, however a local match is required for the planning work. Human Investment Project for Housing (HIP) is a non-profrt organization located in San Mateo County that has programs to assist people with special needs, either from income or circumstance, to live independent, self-sufficient lives in decent, safe, low cost housing. HIP Housing has a homesharing program which provides matches for home providers and home seeker who will pay rent, as well as home seekers who agree to provide services in lieu of paying rent. The property development program works with local jurisdictions to identi$/, acquire, and rehabilitate existing multi-family properties in order to expand the availability of affordable housing and upgrade and maintain existing affordable housing. The home equity conversion program provides loans and educational counseling to older homeowners to help them make use of the equity in their home without requiring them to move. There are several other grants and low interest loan opportunities that are available for housing rehabilitation, construction, acquisition, and preservation in the City of Burlingame. Many of these funds are accessed through the County Office of Housing and Community Development, like the HOME program described above. An example of some of the other programs that Burlingame residents could qualiff for include; CalHome Program California Indian Assistance Program (CIAP), California Self-Help Housing Program (CSHHP), Downtown Rebound Planning Grants Program, Economic Development/Jobs-Housing Balance Program, Emergency City of Burlingame H-35 General Plan r.T HOIISING F',I,F"MF:,NT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Housing Assistance Program (EHAP), Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program (FESG), and Multifamily Housing Program (MHP). Appendix C provides additional information on housing funding in San Mateo County. ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES It is a requirement of every housing element to include a section on residential energy conservation opportunities. Since the deregulation of energy companies in 1998, the price of energy has skyrocketed. Vfith such an increase in prices, energy costs can be a substantial portion of housing costs. Effective energy conservation measures built into or added to existing housing can help residents manage their housing costs over time and keep lower income households affordably housed. There are a number of programs offered by the City of Burlingame, the local energy provider (PG&E) and the State of California, which provide cost- effective energy saving programs. Energy Programs Offered by the City of Burlingame Primary Programs: o All new residential and nonresidential construction in the City must abide by the State of California's residential building standards for energy efficiency (Title 24 of the California Administrative Code). Title 24 Standards were established in 1978 to insure that all-new construction meets a minimum level of energy effrciency standards. Since their establishment, it is estimated that Title 24 Standards along with standards for energy efficient appliances have saved Califomians more than $15.8 billion in electricity and natural gas costs. o The City's zoningordinances do not discourage the installation of solar energy systems and other natural heating and cooling opportunities. o The City's Public Works department is recommending that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a grant application for the innovative peak load reduction program funded though the California Energy Commission. In addition the City is using the services of the State's Energy Partnership Program to identi$ areas of electricity reduction. Secondary Programs: o The City of Burlingame implemented a tree preservation and reforestation ordinance in July 1998. Part of the ordinance requires that when additions are made or new residences are built, property owners shall plant one (1) landscape tree for every 1,000 square of lot coverage or habitable space for single family homes or duplexes; and one (l) landscape tree for every 2,000 square feet of lot coverage for apartment houses and condominiums. In addition, the ordinance provides for the protection of the larger, existing trees in the City. With the proper siting of trees to allow sun exposure in the winter and shade in the summer, a homeowner can save np to 25Yo of a household's energy consumption for heating and cooling. Computer models devised by the U.S. Department of Energy predict that the proper H-36 General PlanCity of Burlingame DRAF'T HOIiSING EI,EMRNT a HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES placement of only three trees will save an average household between $100 to $250 in energy costs annually. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District is encouraging cities to adopt an ordinance which would allow only pellet-fueled wood heaterso an EPA certified wood heater, or a fireplace certified by the EPA should the EPA develop a fireplace certification program for installation of any woodburning appliance. The use of properly regulated woodburning appliances would decrease the amount of natural gas and electricity required to heat homes in the City while preserving the region's air quality. The City of Burlingame adopted an ordinance requiring the recycling and salvaging of construction and demolition materials. Not only will this reduce the amount of materials going to landfills, but it will also conserye energy through the reuse and recycling of these materials. The Steel Recycling Institute reports that steel recycling, the number one recycled material in the U.S., saves enough energy to electrically power the equivalent of 18 million homes for a year. Local Energy Supplier (PG&E) The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) supplies all of the electric and gas needs to the residents of Burlingame. PG&E offers an assortment of programs that provide residents with the opportunity for energy conservation. The following are some programs that are available to residents of Burlingame, including programs for residents who qualiff as low income. Programs Available to All Residents: o 1-2-3 Cashback - A PG&E residential progmm that offers free suggestions on energy savings tips, low-cost home improvement projects and investments you can make to save energy in the future. o Residential Aooliance Rebate - PG&E offers rebates to homeowners who purchase an Energy-Star appliance. This program includes the purchase of an Energy-Star refrigerator, clothes washer/dryer, dishwasher, air conditioner, prograrnmable thermostat and heating and cooling equipment. The amount of the rebate varies from appliance to appliance. o Residential Contractor Program - PG&E's residential contractor program makes available to both contractors and homeowners cost-saving vouchers. The vouchers aid in the purchase of energy efficient home improvements. Rebates range from $30 - $750 depending on the voucher. o 20120 Energy Rebate - Residential customers who reduce their Summer 2001 electricity load by 20% are eligible for a20Yo credit on their bill. o Enersv Efficient Mortqaqe - This Drosram allows residents to make improvements that increase the energy efficiency of their home and finance these improvements through their mortgage. City of Burlingame H-37 General Plan a NRAF'T HOIISING ,RMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Miscellaneous Programs - PG&E also offers rebates for the purchase and installation of compact fluorescent lights, Energy Star floor lamps, hardwired indoor fluorescent fixtures, hardwired outdoor fluorescent fixfures, motion sensors, gas water heaters, electric water heaters, programmable thermostats and whole house fans. All of which are available for purchase through PG&E. Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes: o Energy Partners Program - PG&E's free weatherization program available to low income customers. Qualified, pre-screened contractors make weatherization repairs and improvements for residents who qualiff for the program. o CARE (California Alternate Rates for Energy) - PG&E's discount program for low income households and housing facilities. The CARE program provides a20o/o discount to low- income residents meeting certain standards. It also insures that low income residents are not affected by new surcharges. The CARE program is broken into five categories: 1. CARE Residential Single Family Program 2. CARE Sub-Metered Tenant Program 3. CAREfor Qualified Nonprofit Group Livtng Faciltties 4. CAREfor Qualified Agricultural Employee Housing Facilities 5. CARE Education and Outreach o REACH (Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help) - The REACH program is a one-time energy assistance program sponsored by PG&E and administered by the Salvation Army to assist low income customers particularly the elderly, disabled, sick, working poor or unemployed, in paying for their energy needs. o Strategic Alliance Project - The Strategic Alliance Project examines community, regulatory and political issues affecting PG&E's low income customers and works with community organizations to determine how these clients can benefit from their programs. The State Of California California Energt Commission Rebate Programs: Open to all residents of California, independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding. Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable ene.gy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell poweiedgeneration systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50o/o of the system cost (whichever is less). Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for the installaiion of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal a City of Burlingame H-38 General Plan a DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system. Programsfor Residents Wrho Qualify with Low Incomes:o LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components.l. The Weatherization Program 2. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) 3. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP) Cost-effective energy conservation measures are an affordable and appropriate way for residents to lower both the monthly cost of housing and the cost of their energy bills. There is a wide assortment of programs accessible to all residents of Burlingame through a variety of local and state sponsored programs. The City of Burlingame has prepared an informational packet available to residents highlighting the energy conservation programs available to them. Califurnia Energt Commission Rebate Programs: Open to all residents of California, independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding. a a Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable energy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell powered generation systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50o/o of the system cost (whichever is less). Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for the installation of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system. Programs for Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes:o LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energ), Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components. 4. The Weatherization Program 5. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) 6. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP) City of Burlingame H-39 General Plan DRAF'T EI,EMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Cost-effective energy conservation measures are an affordable and appropriate way for residents to lower both the monthly cost of housing and the cost of their energy bills. There is a wide assortment of programs accessible to all residents of Burlingame through a variety of local and state sponsored programs. The City of Burlingame has prepared an informational packet available to residents highlighting the energy conservation programs available to them. City of Burlingame H-40 General Plan DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM EVALUATION OF THE 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM One of the purposes of preparing a housing element is to provide the community with a way to track their success in meeting the objective of the adopted work program. We can learn from our successes and develop more effective programs or stronger efforts in the areas where we were not a s successful as we hoped. The following is a brief summary of the objectives we laid out in the 1994 Housing Element work program and our community accomplishments. Goal A: Preserve residential character by encouraging maintenance, improvement and rehabilitation of the city's neighborhoods and housing stock. Objective Stable, safe and attractive neighborhoods. - Implemented residential design review to continue the consistency of single family residential blocks and neighborhoods (1998) - Invested $23.7 million in public facilities improvements throughout the city over the planning period, includes street repair and traffrc control, water distribution system, sewer collection system, storm drainage collection system, sidewalk repair and maintenance. Objective: Maintenance of existing affordable housing and reduction of overcrowding. - Six property owners qualiff for subsidized Rehabilitation Loans for structural maintenance and/or to eliminate overcrowding. (achieved 6, work programtarget25) Key Findings: tr Successes of the 1994 Housing Element include:. Implementation of Second Unit Amnesty Program;. Success of Residential Design Review Program; and. Implementation of Residential Overlay Zones. tr These successful progmms are being used as a basis for the 2001-2006 work program:r Expansion of the Second Unit Amnesty Program;. Increased opportunities for Residential Overlay zoning and rezoning of selected sites; and. Build on successful partnerships with non-profit housing providers. City of Burlingame H-41 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM Objective: Retain rental units in order to avoid depleting supply of needed rental units - No existing multiple family rental units were converted to residential condominiums. Added 3lmulti-family rental units during the planning period, first build since 1984. Objective: Retain portions of the housing stock in danger of being converted to non- residential use. - No parcels occupied by residential uses were converted to commercial use during the planning period. - One commercial building was removed and replaced with 20 market rate residential condominiums; a commercial zoned lot was developed with 4 market rate condominiums. Obiective: Ensure affordabiliw of existins units. - Made permanent city agreement with San Mateo county for administration of Community Development Block Grant funding to make resources available to Burlingame residents permanently. - No rehabilitation funds were granted to multiple family property owners in Burlingame during the planning period (achieved 0, work program target 20 units). Objective: Determine Code compliance. structural deficiencies. - Continued to devote staff time to assisting with property research by realtors and property owners. - Did not establish building inspection for a fee program, no public interest. - Hired a part-time code enforcement officer who has resolved 400 cases since he was hired (1998). Objective: Regulate factors such as bulk. light. and air to achieve neighborhood compatibility with new constnrction. - Initiated single family residential design review and approved 207 new (replacement) or remodeled single family residences (April 1998-1999). Goal B: Provide variety and choice of housing by promoting housing opportunities for all persons regardless of age, sex, race, color, marital status, disability, national origin or other barriers. Objective: Public awareness of anti-discrimination laws and policies. - Code enforcement officer work refers 3 to 4 calls a month to La Raza Central Legal, a nonprofit community law center in San Francisco which works with local tenant to resolve landlord/tenant issues (1998). City of Burlingame H-42 General Plan F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM - The city assists financially the Peninsula Conflict resolution Service, a local non-profit group, which now provides assistance to Burlingame residents at no charge (1998). Goal C: Encourage special purpose housing. Objective:-Increase affordability for 50 elderly households (achieved 26. target 50). Units provided under the Second Dwelling Unit Amnesty Program enacted June 2001 will be available to senior citizens. (achieved 0) Rental assisted dwelling units for the elderly using Section 8 Rent Subsidy. (achieved 11, 9 very low income, 2 low income). Developed a public information handout identiffing senior services, maintained annually through the Parks and Recreation Department; Senior Resources Handbook: An Information guidefor Burlingame Senior Citizens. City contributed $67,460 during the planning period to local and county non-profit agencies which assist senior citizens. Helped 15 elderly be more affordably housed: The Human Investment Project for Housing (HIP) found shared housing for 15 households,T very low income, 3 low income, 5 moderate. (1999) Developer built a 48 bed convalescent care facility with Alzheimer treatment capability. Objective Improve livabilitv of housing units for all residents. including l0 disabled accessible units. City did not accomplish this program during the planning period . (achieved 0, target 10), although did enforce all requirements of Building Code for accessibility throughout the Planning period. 26 disabled persons received Section 8 rental assistance in Burlingame (21 very low income; 6 low income) Objective: Add l0 affordable housing units for single parent households. - In 1999, l6 low income single heads of households received Section 8 rental assistance in Burlingame. (achieved 16, target l0) Objective Affordable housing for all residents. including 50 studio or one-bedroom units for single occupants. Placed an overlay zone in transit corridor to encourage high density residential development over commercial area bounded by Murchison- California Drive-rear of the properties fronting Dufferin-El Camino Real. City of Burlingame H-43 General Plan F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM Correction and maintenance of an older multi-family building which resulted in the addition of one affordable low-income unit managed by Shelter Network (achieved l, target 50) Objective: Provide local share of support for county-wide homeless problem. - Annual contributions totaling $126,210 during the planning period (1994- 1999) to support local and counfiide agencies who serve the homeless. - City contributed $30,000 toward construction of a new North San Mateo County Homeless Shelter for Single Adults on a county owned parcel in South San Francisco. - Interfaith Hospitality Network day center and in Burlingame three of nine participating churches provide temporary shelter for five families with children. (achieved 5, target unstated) Goal D: Reduce residential energy use to conserve energy and help reduce housing costs. Objective: Incorporate energy conservation in all new and substantially rehabilitated residential construction. - During the planning period the Building Division issued 4,681building permits, all construction where it was required was inspected for compliance with Title 24 energy conservation. - Adopted an Urban Reforestation Ordinance which protects existing substantial tree and requires all new development and major remodeling to plant trees substantial enough to achieve benefits of shading. (1998) Objective: Community awareness of conservation benefits. - Adopted ordinance which places limitations on exterior illumination on residential and commercial properties throughout the community. Has affected all new development and major remodels with exterior illumination since I 996. Goal E: Achieve increased affordability of housing. Objective:Stimulate development of housing by promoting at least 60 units per year (20 market rate units and 40 affordable units) betrveen 1oo4 and 2000. Status of sites identified for affordable housing in the 1994 Housing Element (achieved 20, target 60) a. Adjoining parcels at El Camino Real and Trousdale: rezoned with high density residential overlay. (achieved 20 market rate, target 7s) City of Burlingame H-44 General Plan F'T HOIISING F],I,F],MF],NT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM Residential development over parking Murchison and California; rezoned with high density residential overlay (achieved 0, target 50) Interior parcel Trousdale-Ogden-Murchison-Magnolia, group facility for the elderly (achieved 0, target 150) California Drive between Juanita and Broadway: (achieved 0, target 100) Use air-rights over public parking lots along Donnelly and between Howard and Bayswater (achieved 0, target none) Corner Highland and Howard Avenues: single resident occupancy. (achieved 0, target 40) An additional60 multiple family housing units and 2 single family homes on new sites were built on infill sites not identified in the 1994 Housing Element Objective: Foster development by becoming proactive in contact with property owners and knowledge of site potential. - Staff assisted in facilitating the development of 115 new multiple family dwellings, accomplished design review of 207 new (replacement) or remodeled single family houses and2 single family homes on new sites. - To provide better service to applicants and customers added two planning staff positions during the planning period. Objective: Identiff sites for small, no frills SRO's. - No additional sites for single residence occupancy were identified. The one identified in the element was not developed with SRO units. Objective: To include approximately 250 currently illegal and non-conforming accessory housing units as legitimate portions of the City's affordable housing stock. - In May 2001 city created a two year arnnesty program for second dwelling units in the single family zone built before 1954 (Ord. 1653). (achieved 0, target 250) Objective: To expand by 50 units the stock of affordable housing to help meet housing needs. - Interfaith Hospitality Network located its new temporary housing for homeless families with children program in Burlingame. (achieved 5, target 50) Objective: Obtain a share of the estimated 300 units to be assisted by the first-time buyer program (Mortgage Credit Certificate). b. c. d. e. f. City of Burlingame H-45 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT EVALUATION OF 1994 HOUSING ELEMENT WORK PROGRAM No Burlingame residents received such assistance during the planning period (achieved 0, target 15) Table H-7 - Quantilied Summary of 1994 Housing Element: Dwelling Units Provided by Income Category 1994 1999 *Since all new development is on infill sites, new development replaces existing units, these numbers reflect the net increase in dwelling units. **Fifty-five households received public assistance through the Section 8 program (41 very low income, 12 low income and 2 moderate income). *Number of affordable housing units conserved includes the following: Section 8 55 (includes 4l very low, 12 low, and 2 moderate income) Shared Housing 15 (7 very low, 3 low, 5 moderate income) t994 Unmet Local Tareet 1994 ABAG Unmet tr'air Share ABAG Fair Share 1994 Tarset New Construction (net new units)* Rehabilitation Conservation*Total Income Category Local Tarset Achieved Local Tarset Achieved Local Tarset Achieved Local Target Achieved 4g,i,r 235 48 187 223VeryLow27114000095 90 0 55 6 250 l5'r'l 395 2l 374 210Low231 278Moderate28500l00l57**25 7 l8 40 324 0 246Above Moderate 570 40 tt7 207 (des. rev) 70 695 400 s79 957Total1357270tt7652r3360 City of Burlingame H-46 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY RESOIJRCES COMMUNITY RESOURCES LAND INVENTORY AND SITE IDENTIFICATION State law requires that local governments identiff sufficient vacant or underdeveloped land to accommodate the community's housing needs. One of the primary ways to do this is the identification oflands suitable for future residential development. This identification should include review ofvacant sites and sites that have potential for reuse or whose use could be intensified for residential use. An important factor in suitability ofsites for housing is the relationship of the identified sites to appropriate zoning, public facilities and services. Public Owned Properties There are 101 publicly owned properties in Burlingame. This includes land owned by the City, hospitals and school districts. Most ofthese properties currently are developed with public facilities, such as schools, parking lots, libraries, hospitals, parks and City corporation yards and water tanks and pump stations. There are some very small "leftover" parcels, such as public easements and street rights-of-way. None ofthe left over parcels have area of sufficient size to support residential development. tr Burlingame began as a "transit village" focused at the Burlingame train station. tr Since Burlingame is primarily built out, new housing opportunities will have to replace existing development. tr Sites identified for residential reuse generally follow the transit village pattern with sites identified:. North end of Burlingame near the new BART station in Millbrae.. Near the Broadway and Burlingame train stations. tr Transition areas are also identified to improve compatibility between residential areas and other land uses:. Near Burlingame Avenue Commercial District. Along Rollins Road south of Bloomfield. East side of Carolan Avenue south of North Park Apartments D Incentives are proposed for new development that encourages affordable housing and are near transit hubs. o Because of recent improvements to public facilities in the north end of Burlingame, there is adequate capacity to accommodate new development proposed. Key Findings: City ofBurlingame H-47 General Plan VACANT PARCELS DR HOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY RESOURCES Private Properties Which Are Now Vacant There are about 100 privately owned, vacant properties in Burlingame. Of these, 25 properties are in the bayfront arca; an area which is not planned for residential uses, and where there are no support services and facilities for residential uses, such as schools, libraries and shopping centers. For this reason, these sites have been eliminated from consideration. Within the area developed with single family houses, there are about 15 isolated "infill lots" each about 5000 SF. Generally these are part of presently developed double and triple lots. The single lots will not become available until the structure on the combined lots is removed. The few undeveloped public and private owned properties judged to have significant development potential are included in the following analysis. PROPERTIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DEYELOPMENT Two types of properties have been included in this general category. The first includes underdeveloped or vacant properties zoned for high density residential use. An inventory of these properties, along with an estimated buildout capacity, is included in Table H-2. The second category includes properties in areas that are now zoned and often developed for commercial use, but with the potential for rezoning or adding a residential overlay zone and have future residential development potential. In addition to proposing rezoning programs for these sites, it is proposed that zoning code changes be implemented which would offer incentives for building affordable housing and incentives for building more housing within one-third mile of the three transportation hubs. A description of the actions to be taken to achieve these goals is at the end of this chapter. Vacant Or Underused Sites Now Zoned For Residential Use There are a number of sites already zoned for residential use where the potential has not been used. All three of these parcels are within the area bounded by Murchison and Dufferin between El Camino Real and Califomia Drive. This office commercial area was rezoned with an R-4 overlay as part of the 1994 Housing Element work program. Since 1994, one office building was removed and the 1.24 acre site has been developed with a 2O-unit residential condominium and a 48-bed residential care facility for the elderly. All of these sites are within one-half mile of the Millbrae BART Station now under construction and because of proximity to a transit terminal would warrant special provisions for higher residential density such as reduced parking requirements and increased height. All development of sites in this area is subject to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval for height. tr 1800 Et Camino Real - There are 3 vacant parcels under one ownership with a total of 0.90 acres zoned C-1, with a multiple family residential overlay zone. Development on this site will be affected by the fact that two sides are adjacent to a parcel developed with a large nursing facility. City of Burlingame H-48 General Plan DRAF"T HclIISING tr"I,EMF"NT COMMUNIry RESOURCES tr 1875 California Drive - This corner site is about 1/3 ofan acre and is developed with a car wash. The site is also zoned C-l with a multiple family residential overlay zone, and is within one-third mile of the proposed Millbrae BART station. o 1870 El Camino Real - This is a 0.78 acre site now developed with an older two-story, 24' tall offrce building. The site is adjacent to the car wash site noted above. The office building was built in the 1970's and does not have adequate parking to serve its needs. Redevelopment ofthe site is also constrained by some existing access easements to parking which serves adjacent office buildings to the south. The site has potential for high density residential use. The site is within one-third mile of the Millbrae BART station now under construction. Source: Burlirgame Planning Department, 2001 Area z,one Description Assumptions # Units Site I c-t/R4 Overlay 1800 El Camino Real 3 vacant parcels under one ownership with a total of 0.9 acres with a multifamily residential overlay zone. . s-story, 60' in height. 66 unia/acre. includes affordable density bonus (15% ofunits) 60 Site 2 c-l/R4 Overlay 1875 Califomia Drive Comer site with a total of 0.33 acres with a multifamily residential overlay zone, within one-third mile of the proposed Millbrae BART station. . 5-story, 60' in height . 86 unitVacre . efliciency units with decreased parking requirement of one parking space per unit ifall units affordable 28 Site 3 RC 4 I 1870 El Camino Real Parcel with a total of0.78 acres with a multifamily residential overlay zone fronting on El Camino Real and California Drive, within one-third mile ofthe proposed Millbrae BART station. . s-story, 60' in height . 65 unitVacre. includes affordable density bonus (15% ofunits) 5l Site 4 c-l/R-4 Overlay One additional office site in existing overlay zone about % acre. E{fi ciency units (500-600 SF each) reduced parking requirement ofone space per unit ifall units affordable to very low and low income 86 units/acre 43 Total # ofUnits:182 City ofBurlingame H-49 General Plan Table H-8 - Vacant or Underused Sites Overlay DRAF'T HOI ISING EI,EMENT L ts L COMMUNITY RESOURCES SELECTED SITES NOW ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL USE These sites have been selected for potential reuse because they are either close to a transit hub or offer an opporhrnity for beffer transition between existing commercial and residential areas. Those sites that are near transit hubs would be considered for higher densities, while those in hansition areas would need to be designed to fit into the existing adjacent development. Transit Oriented Development Burlingame began as a small grouping of commercial buildings around our train stations supported by apartments and single family development within walking distance. Over the years the City's growth radiated from these core areas. There are three transit terminals serving Burlingame: the Burlingame Train Station, the Millbrae train station and the BART/train station in Millbrae. Today, the land within one-third to one-half mile of our transit stations is fully developed, so any new residential development would involve reuse in the area. A number of sites have been identified with easy access to the existing transportation centers and corridors serving the City. All of these sites are within one-third to one-half mile of a station. O Along California Drive near Broadway: This area is now zoned C-2, and consists of a variety of commercial uses including office and retail. It is located less than one-fourth mile from the Broadway Caltrain station and therefore has good pedestrian access and potential for transit oriented development. However, these are small parcels (ranging in size from 3800 SF to 9600 SF) and will not yield many units unless they are consolidated into larger parcels for development. tr C-3 zoned area north and west of Peninsula Hospital: This area is now zoned C-3, which allows office development for medical and financial businesses. Residential uses are generally considered to be compatible with office uses, since the hours of operation of the office uses are generally the same hours that people are away from home at work and school and there is little activity at office sites on evening and weekends. In this area, there are several areas which have some vacant land with potential for residential use. The C-3 zone is unique because the current zoning regulations required the existing office buildings to meet residential setbacks. 1764Marco Polo Way - This 1.13 acre parcel is now zoned for professional office uses, is owned by Poplar Recare, a nonprofit organization that houses their childrens services and adult day care programs at this site. They are considering relocation of their children's services facilities to another site and could provide housing on this site in conjunction with their adult day care program. The property across the street on Marco Polo Way is now zoned for and developed in multiple family residential uses. 1777 Murchison Drive - This is a vacant 1.3 acre piece of land at the center of the block accessed across the Buddhist Association administrative offrces site on Murchison which is zoned for professional office use. - - - - - - - - - T City of Burlingame H-50 General Plan DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT COMMUNITY RESOURCES Since this area already contains a mix of commercial and residential uses, it is a good location to consider livdwork units and mixed uses. It is recommended that zoning code changes he made to allow live/work units and to olfer viable standards for their construction. This area may not yield a lot of new housing units. The parcels in this area are typical small lots, most are fifty feet wide by about 120 feet deep, which could accommodate 3 to 4 units at most. Unless parcels are consolidated, it will be difficult to gain too many more units. There are two parcels along Highland Avenue that are adjacent to the "Auto Row" overlay zone (Subarea D), and are now used for automobile storage for auto sales businesses on Auto Row. These parcels are larger than most in the area, and could accommodate about 35 units each. It is proposed that a density bonus be offered for sites in this area that are combined. u Rollins Road south of Bloomfield Road: This area is now zoned R-3 (multiple family residential), with an overlay that limits development to one unit per 2000 SF of land area (equivalent to 21 units per acre). This area acts as a transition area between State Route 101 (the Bayshore Freeway) and the single family homes immediately to the east. The area could support higher densities and still maintain its transition function by including design considerations to make additional units compatible with the adjoining single family homes. A new overlay zone was applied in 2000 along Rollins Road north of this area which allows higher densities, provides a density bonus for lot combination, but limits the height to two stories, not to exceed 30' in height and limits density without the bonus to one unit per 1500 SF of land area (equivalent to 29 units per acre). This same concept could be applied to this area. Most parcels are 50'wide and less than 6000 SF in area, and now contain duplexes. With this change, each site could support up to 4 units, and still have features which are compatible with the adjacent single family homes. However, if lots are combined, there would be more opportunity to build a project with both more units and on-site amenities such as common open space. O East side of Carolan next to North Park Apartments: This area consists of four parcels totaling 5.38 acres, now zoned C-2. The primary existing use is auto related businesses. This is a pocket of commercial development located between two residential areas and is within walking distance (less than one-half mile) from the Broadway Caltrain station. The location between the high density residential North Park Apartments (developed at 43 units per acre) and the single family neighborhood (fronting on Toyon Drive) to the south offers an opportunity to provide a more suitable transition between the two residential areas. It is proposed that the northern 3.35 acres be rezoned to the R-4 zone district and developed at a density of 43 units per acre, comparable to the adjacent North Park apartments. The remaining 2.03 acres adjacent to the existing single family R-1 lots to the south would be suitable for R-3 zoning restricted to townhouse development, with a limitation on density and height to provide a good transition between the high density use and the single family houses fronting on Toyon Drive. H-53 General PlanCity of Burlingame DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT COMMUNITY RESOURCES Table H-10 - Transition Areas Area Zone Description Assumptions # Units Area I R-3 Rollins Road South of Bloomfield Transition area between SR l0l and the single family homes to the east. Area is zoned R-3 with an overlay that limits development to I unit/2000 SF of land area. . Extend Rollins Road multiple family subzone from Bloomfield Road to Burlingame Avenue.. Density will be increased from one dwelling unit/2000 SF of land to one dwelling unit/I500 SF of land.. 30o of lots will be combined into two lots. These lots would be developed at one unit per 1500 SF of land + one unit for combined lot.. Remaining lots at 2l units/acre. 2-story height limit 46 Area2 c-2 East side of Carolan next to North Park Apartments Four parcels totaling 5.38 acres located between two residential areas and less than %mile from the Broadway train station. , 3.346 acre parcel would require rezone to R-4. 3-story, 35' in height . 43 units/acre. includes affordable density bonus ( I 5% of units) t44 . 2.034 acre parcel would be rezoned to R-3 Townhouse . 20 units/acre. 2-story max. height within 40' of south property line; garages facing north property line; front entrances facing south property line 4t Area 3 c-l Area south of Burlingame Avenue (Subarea C) . 3-story, 35' in height. 35 units/acre for parcels over 20,000 SF. smaller parcels can add 3-6 units per lot, bonus for combined lots. . would require rezone to R-4 residential overlay zone ' one 0.8 acre site to accommodate efficiency units -one parking space per unit if all units affordable to very low and low income. excellent opportunity for live/work units 50 70 Total # of Units:351 City of Burlingame H-55 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ETEMENT COMMUNITY RESOURCES ACTTONS REQUTRED/ZONING CHANGES Some of these areas already have zoning in place to achieve new residential development. In order to make the remaining areas available for residential development and to improve the opportunities on existing residential sites, the following actions are required. Rezoning from C-l to Multiple Family R-3 and R-4 The property south of North Park Apartments requires rezoning from C-l to R-3 and R-4 to create a priority for residential use and to make the sites available for residential use. Create an R-3 Overlay zone The C-l and C-3 zoned property in the area bounded by El Camino Real, the Peninsula Hospital Property, Marco Polo Way and Murchison Drive would need to have a residential overlay zone applied in order to facilitate residential development of vacant and underused parcels. The overlay zone approach would allow the existing office and commercial uses to remain, but would add the opportunity for high density residential development which would match the height and mass of the office buildings already in this area close to mass transit. Create an R-4 Overlay zone The area south of Burlingame Avenue now zoned C-l would need an R-4 residential overlay zone. There are other R-4 zoned properties in the area, and this zoning would be compatible with these and the surrounding area. Using the overlay approach, some of the existing commercial and office uses which support the downtown commercial center could also comfortably remain. Amend The Zoning Code To Offer Incentives For Affordable Housing And Transit Oriented Development In areas near a transit hub, zoning code changes would be considered to:. provide incentives for affordable housing;. provide for reduced parking and increased height for development within one-third mile of a transportation hub; and. provide incentives such as reduced parking requirement for efficiency units if all units are affordable.. amend the zoning code regulations to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed use projects. City of Burlingame H-56 General Plan DRAF'T HOT]SING EI,EMENT COMMUNITY RESOURCES Table H-11 - Estimated Potential for Selected Sites very Low Low Mod Above Mod Total # Units Vacant or Underused Sites 1800 El Camino Real 2 I 6 51 60 1875 California Drive 19 9 0 0 28 1870 El Camino Real 1 I 5 44 5l Site 4 29 t4 0 0 43 Subtotal:51 25 11 95 182 Transit Oriented Sites 1764Marco Polo Way 0 0 56 0 56 1777 Murchison Drive I I 8 55 65 1825 Magnolia Drive I I 7 59 70 Along California Dr North of Broadway 0 0 50 0 50 Subtotal:))123 tt4 241 Transition Areas Rollins Rd. South of Bloomfield 2 I 4 39 46 East side of Carolan next to Northpark 7 4 t7 157 l8s Area south of Burlingame Avenue 49 24 4 43 120 Subtotal:58 29 25 239 351 Total:111 56 159 448 774 Regional Housing Need 110 56 157 242 565 City of Burlingame H-57 General Plan NR F'T HOIISING EI,NMRNT COMMUNITY RESOURCES PUBLIC FACILITY CAPACITY The City of Burlingame is almost built out and public facilities in place are adequate to serve existing and proposed development. There are two public improvement projects which have been completed in the last l0 years which have removcd any constraints to new residential development, particularly at the north end of the city. Many of the sites identified are located in the northern portion of the City. Sewer Treatment Plant Improvements In 1994, major improvements were made to the City's wastewater treatment plant facilities. As a result of these upgrades, the capacity of the plant was increased to accommodate the ultimate population anticipated in the City's General Plan. According to estimates made by the Association of Bay Area Governments, Burlingame's General Plan buildout would accommodate an additional 817 housing units above what is shown to exist Burlingame by Census 2000. Therefore, there is adequate capacity at the wastewater treatment to handle the projected 565 units proposed. Sewer Interceptor Project In 1998, the Public Works Department completed a major sewer interceptor project which included installation of new sewer collection main along California Drive from the City's north boundary to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. This project improved the capacity of the sewer collection system and provided sufficient capacity for development in the north end of Burlingame, including all the sites selected north of peninsula Hospital. City of Burlingame H-58 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY OPPORTTINITIES C OMMUNITY OPPORTUI{ITIE S Since 1994 the residents and City Council of Burlingame have worked hard and achieved many of the implementing action programs set out in the 1994 Housing Element. In some cases time and opportunity thwarted the accomplishment of some programs. Over the past eight years circumstances facing the city and its residents have also changed. In this section the focus is on the particular successes of the 1994 Housing Element which should be carried forward, the lessons to be learned from the action programs not achieved, and the changing circumstances which will affect the City's housing opportunities and programs in the coming planning period. Key Programmatic Accomplishments of the 1994 Housing Element Burlingame's 1994 Housing Element action program was divided by planning goals. The premise was that the residents, Council and staff would work together identifying and implementing action programs to create opportunity for more housing to assist in meeting the City's share of California's housing need but also to assist those households with unique housing needs. In Burlingame these households include the elderly who live on lower or fixed incomes, single heads of households, and our service and public employees. Because more than half the City's single family housing stock and neighborhoods were built before 1940, maintenance and conservation of neighborhood character was a leading issue during the planning period. O With the location of a new BART station at Burlingame's northern border, new opportunities to expand on Burlingame's origin as a transit village along the San Francisco to San Jose rail have emerged since the state and city certified Burlingame's 1994 Housing Element. tr During implementation of the 1994 Housing Element effective housing progftrms emerged in the areas of neighborhood and housing stock maintenance (residential design review), affordable housing (second unit amnesty) and mixed use overlay zoning (shift of land uses from older commercial uses to high density residential).tr The 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is built on these successes:. legislative incentives to build housing and affordable units;. continue existing effective programs for housing maintenance and affordability such as second unit amnesty and design review;. continue code enforcement; ' staff training for making matches between development and funding options and facilitating compliance with other agencies to reduce development time; and. build on successful partnerships with non-profit providers. Key Findings: City of Burlingame H-59 General Plan DR AF'T HrlITSIN(i F',I,RMENT COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES Among the most effective new programs developed and implemented during the planning period to meet these regional and community needs were: O Single family residential design review which places an emphasis on structural and neighborhood conservation and maintenance; tr Second Unit Amnesty which encourages the retention and maintenance as lower cost housing of second units built before 1954 on single family lots; tr High density residential overlay zoning on older, now marginally developed commercial land to facilitate these private property owners to change to residential uses; tr Established a code enforcement officer position to assist in property maintenance issues and broker tenant/owner disputes; tr Participated in and funded the city's proportional share of a new north San Mateo County homeless shelter for single adults; tr Approved use permits for a day center and emergency shelters at local churches to participate in and on going program of emergency housing and support assistance for five homeless families; O Enacted urban reforestation and exterior illumination regulations which support local goals for energy conservation. Building on these programs, over the planning period the City added 117 dwelling units, rehabilitated2l3 dwelling units and conserved as affordable housing 70 dwelling units. The numbers of households added and affected may be below our 1994 Housing Element targets; but during the planning period the city laid more ground work for maintaining the City's residential qualify and supporting affordable housing than with any other Housing Element implementation program. The 2001-2006 Housing Element will build on and expand on this legislative base and implementation experience. Changed Circumstances During the 1994 Housing Element program period a regional decision was made to extend the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system further down the San Francisco Peninsula and to San Francisco International Airport. Implementation of this decision brought the last station on the BART line to the southern border of Millbrae, and 1200 feet of tail track into Burlingame. The end of the line station, including a CalTrain cross platforrn, now lies within a third of a mile of an area of Burlingame now developed with older office buildings and the immediate area's largest hospital, Mills-Peninsula. A recent decision has been made to reconstruct the hospital on its same site for seismic compliance within the next five to ten years. Not only is the hospital a major community facility, it is a major employer of service workers, many with lower incomes. Clearly there is now a need for and incentive to build more housing for families and individuals with a range of incomes at the north end of Burlingame. City of Burlingame H-60 General Plan DRAFTHOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES Existing circumstances continue and affect local planning. Because Burlingame is built out and two of the City's five square miles of area are under San Francisco Bay water, the only way to add housing will be to change land uses or mix residential uses with other existing land uses. This land use mixing must be done in such a way that desirable residential areas and neighborhoods are created while preserving the City's economic base so the additional cost of services for an aging infrastructure and for expanded services to new housing can be met through its economic base. The City is undertaking a Specific Area Plan study for the north end of the city by the new BART facilities, including the adjacent industrial area. A focus of this study is how to create proper transitions between residential and other land uses, as well as to determine how to retain a viable industrial area in order to maintain the existing revenue flow and to assist financially in supporting this new development. The specific area plan will build on and reinforce, with design suggestions, the siting studies done which will be adopted as a part of the 2001 -2006 Housing Element. Lessons from the 1994 Housing Element Implementation The city has learned from the variety of experience implementing the 1994 Housing Element. The proposed 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is based on the current Housing Element's successes and reality checks. We have been successful with legislation which provides incentives for private developers to change land use from commercial to residential using multiple family overlay zones on commercial properties as well as with incentives to single family homeowners to maintain their properties and retain older second units. Without a redevelopment agency or direct government entitlement funds, we have learned that city staff must work at being informed and build a bridge of information and program linkage between developers and available assistance. Moreover, as the regulatory programs outside the City's control multiply and discourage new residential development by increasing its cost, City staff must be trained to facilitate and communicate. The 2001-2006 Housing Element work program is built on these lessons. The City's mandate is to facilitate development which implements the City's planning goals and policies and to maintain the City's services and facilities to meet the standards of regulatory agencies and residents needs so that new residential development can be accommodated. The private sector's mandate is to build new residential units within the established goals and policies. The Housing Element will provide the link to form a partnership. The types of programs proposed in the 2001-2006 Housing Element which should succeed because they build on the success and experience of the 1994 Housing Element are: tr Rehabilitation through code enforcement; tr Continuation of Second Unit Amnesty program coupled with participation in county housing rental rehabilitation programs; O Residential and neighborhood maintenance through residential design review; tr Create zoning incentives for transit oriented development with inclusion of affordable units within 1/3 mile of the City's three transit hubs; tr Form a partnership with a local non-profit to insure existing and new residential units stay City of Burlingame H-61 General Plan DRAF'T HOTISTNG E,I,EMENT COMMUMry OPPORTUNITIES affordable; O Build on successful partnerships with non-profit providers and provide more regulatory incentives to encourage housing assistance for senior citizens including assistance in modiffing existing housing for the elderly and disabled; D Use zoning to provide more incentives for residential uses in mixed use and transition areas, have zoning in place early to take advantage of opportunities;tr Continuous staff training and encouragement in their role as program facilitator and broker between funding agencies and private developers. City of Burlingame H-62 General Plan DR r.T ITNIISTN(: E'I T']VINNT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM 2001 -2006 GOAT,S AND POLICIES This section of the Housing Element contains the goals and policies that the City of Burlingame intends to implement to address the housing needs identified in the needs assessment evaluation. The following section on Action Programs outlines specific actions to be taken to meet the goals and policies. GOAL A:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF THE CITYIS NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING STOCK. Policy H(A-l): Protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods. Policy H(A-2): Continue rehabilitation of structures in poor condition. Policy H(A-3): Maintain rental opporilnities by discouraging conversion of affordable rental units to condominiums. Policy H(A-4): Policy H(A-5): Promote programs that protect the City's lower-valued housing stock. Pursue federal and State funds for the rehabilitation of lower and moderate income housing. Policy H(A-6): Policy H(A-7): Provide pre-sale inspection upon request. Consider neighborhood quality when approving new and remodeled residences. Key Findings: o The Housing Element goals and policies compose the description of Burlingame's land use and development parameters for housing. The action program is the description of the specific means proposed for implementing these goals and policies in the next planning period for housing,200l through 2006. tr A unique aspect of the Housing Element action program is that it establishes quantified targets for the planning period and establishes a time frame for accomplishing each action. B The city's accomplishments in terms of action program must be reported to the City Council and State of California annually. The form for the City's annual progress report to the City Council and State concludes this section. City of Burlingame H-63 General Plan DR AET HOIISING EI,F"MENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL B:PROVIDE VARIETY A}ID CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS. Policy H(B-l): Promote equal housing opportunities for all Burlingame residents. GOAL C:PROVIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORIGRS AND OTHERS IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY WHO WORI( IN BURLINGAME. Policy H (C):Inform local public sector and private sector employees about available housing assistance programs. Policy H(C-2): Encourage inclusion of affordable dwelling units in multiple-family residential development. Policy H(C-3):Encourage public agency partnerships to provide housing, reduce commute time andfacilitate retention of community based groups like teachers, public employees, hospital and service sector workers. GOAL D: Policy H(D-1): Policy H(D-2): Policy H(D-3): Policy H(D-a): Policy H(D-5): GOAL E: Policy H(E-1): Policy H(E-2): ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING. Provide adequate, affordable housing for the City's elderly. Encourage alterations to existing structures that improve access for physically disadvantaged. Encourage housing opportunities for single-parent families. Encourage housing opportunities for low income single persons. Support county-wide program for homeless persons. REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS. Promote the use of energy conservation in residential construction. Encourage energy conservation measures in rehabilitation projects. City of Burlingame H-64 General Plan DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT GOAL F: HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING. Policy H(F-l): Improve balance of housing type, tenure and affordability by encouraging development of the sites and locations listed below to serve the income levels indicated. Vacant or Underused Sites: 1800 El Camino Real, 0.9 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay 1875 Califomia Drive, 0.33 acre zoned C-1/R-4 overlay 1870 El Camino Real,0.78 acre zoned C-ll R-4 overlay One additional office site,0.5 acre zoned C-1lR-4 overlay Transit Oriented Sites 1730 Marco Polo Way, vacant 0.9 acre site zoned C-3 1777 Murchison Drive, vacant 1.3 acres zoned C-3 1825 Magnolia Drive, 1.4 acre site zoned C-3 California Drive north of Broadway, zonedC-2 Transition Areas Rollins Road south of Bloomfield, zoned R-3 East side of Carolan between Cadillac and Toyon, 5.4 acres zonedC-2 Area south of Burlingame Avenue commercial area, zoned C-1 Policy H(F-2): Maintain data base of existing R-3, R-4 and CR zoning districts to remain aware of the number of additional units that could be developed on "under- developed" parcels in these areas. Policy H(F-3): Encourage construction of mixed commercial-residential projects. Policy H(F-a): Encourage conversion of existing accessory living units to legal, safe and sanitary housing units. Policy H(F-5): Encourage non-profit housing corporations to develop affordable housing in appropriate sites in Burlingame. Policy H(F-6): Work for expansion of Section 8 program in Burlingame. Policy H(F7):Encourage participation in the San Mateo County first-time buyer program (Mortgage Credit Certificate) and other ownership assistance programs. City of Burlingame H-65 General Plan F'T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM ACTION PROGRAM This Section outlines the programs and actions to be taken to implement the policies listed above. Some of these are ongoing programs now in place, others will require changes to the s ordinances and GOAL A: PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING MAINTENA}ICE, IMPROVEMENT AI\ID REHABILITATION OF THE CITY'S ITEIGHBORIIOODS AND HOUSING STOCI( Five Year Objective: Continue maintenance programs for public facilities. H(A-1)Maintenance of Public Facilities In residential neighborhoods continue the maintenance and enhancement of public facilities such as streets, water supply and drainage by allocations from the general fund, gas tax revenue and, where appropriate, conditions of development. Five Year Objective: Rehabilitate 20 housing units. H(A-2)Housing Rehabilitation Through the City's Code Enforcement Program, establish a program of contacting owners of structures that appear to be overcrowded, declining or in need of repair. Refer property owners to the Rehabilitation Loan Program administered by San Mateo County to assist qualified homeowners in making necessary repairs to structures in need of rehabilitation. Five Year Objective: No conversion of existing rental stock to condominiums H(A-3)Discourage condominium conversions Maintain the existing zoning controls which prohibit conversion of residential rental projects with fewer than 2l units to condominiums, and which contain strict regulations prohibiting conversion of less than 21 units to condominiums. Five Year Objective: Retain existing rental housing H(A-4)Prevent conversion of residential units to non- residential use. Amend zoning code to require a conditional use permit for any project where residential units are proposed to be replaced by non-residential use. City of Burlingame H-66 General Plan L NP ^ FT HTTIISINC F',I,F'M['-NT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL A: PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING MAINTENATICE, IMPROYEMENT A1YD REHABILITATION OF THE CITYIS NEIGHBORIIOODS AI\ID HOUSING STOCK. H(A-S)Ensure affordability of existing units. Continue the relationship with the County of San Mateo Department of Housing for administration of Block Grant funds for housing programs; encourage use of available programs (such as HOME) to assist non-profit housing corporations in acquiring, rehabilitating and managing apartment units for long-term affordability. Five Year Objective: Encourage acquisitton and rehabilitation of 20 apartment units for long-term affordable housing. H(A-6)Determine code compliance, structural deficiencies of existing residences upon sale. Continue program that assists in research of residential records upon the request of realtors or potential home buyers. Five Year Objective: Continue assistance to potential home buyers H(A-7)Residential design review Continue implementation of residential design review and zoning regulations including setbacks, floor area ratio, declining height; continue implementation of single family design review guidelines adopted in 1998. Five Year Objective: Process 250 applications for residential design revian GOAL B: PROVIDE VARIETY AltD CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING HOUSTNG OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS. H(B-l)Public awareness of anti-discrimination laws and policies. Continue to fund the Code Enforcement Officer position and coordination with Planning Department code enforcement activities; provide information handouts; inform the public and local realtors about equal housing laws and recourse available in case of violations; refer complaints to California Department of Fair Employment and Housing; refer complaints regarding discrimination to LaRaza Central Legal, a nonprofit community law center which works with local tenants to resolve landlord/tenant issues. Five Year Objective Continue referral activities through Code Enforcement Program H-67 General PlanCity of Burlingame DRAF'T EI,EMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL C: PROVIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORKERS AND OTHERS rN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY WHO WORK IN BURLINGAME. H(C-l)Refer eligible employees to housing assistance programs. Train staff about current opportunities; make available brochures and contact information to eligible residents who inquire about availability of programs. Refer eligible residents to CDBG programs administered by the County Offrce of Housing and Community Development. Five Year Objective: Continue stafftraining and to refer eligible residents to programs H(C-2)Provide incentives for developers to include affordable units in new residential projects Amend the zoning code to provide opportunities for density bonuses (through changes in parking requirements and/or height/bulk restrictions) for residential projects which include affordable units and are located within l/3 mile of a transit station. Forge a partnership with a local non-profit agency to insure the units remain affordable Five Year Objective: Provtde 75 new affordable units at transit hubs H(C-i) Encourage public agenqt partnerships to provide housing, reduce commute time, and facilitate retention of groups like teachers, public employees, hospital and service sector workers. Contact public agencies to encourage them to include a provision for housing in any facility expansion plans; disseminate information about available CDBG funded programs.. Five Year Objective: Provide 50 new housing units in the vicinity of public agency workplaces and commercial centers. GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING. H@-1)Increase affordability for elderly households. a. Extend the second unit amnesty program for five years to allow creation ofaccessible secondary units for the frail elderly; b. Continue to allow upon request curbside disabled accessible parking spaces in single family neighborhoods Five Year Objective: Provide 30 affordable units for the elderly. Increase number of Section I units for elderly by 5 units. City of Burlingame H-68 General Plan F'T Hr)ITSIN(: F',I,F"MENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING. c. Coordinate with San Mateo County Housing Authority to increase the number of Section 8 units for Burlingame's elderly population. d. Continue updating and distributing widely to local residents the Senior Resources Handbook: An Informational Guide for B urlingame Senior Citizens, Their Familtes and Caregivers. e. Expand incentives for new senior housing by amending the code to allow reduced parking requirements for assisted living projects. f. Continue City financial support to non-profit agencies which administer housing programs for seniors (home sharing, reverse mortgage). Planning staff to work with these agencies to facilitate implementation of their programs in Burlingame. g. Encourage non-profit housing grcups to develop housing by having adequate Planning staff to facilitate proj ect processing and environmental review, and by maintaining the existing incentives in the zoning regulations for residential facilities for the elderly. h. Refer seniors who are homeowners to the Human Investment Project for Housing Home Sharing Program, to find eligible tenants to share their housing. H(D-2)Improve livability of housing units for disabled population. Formulate and consider code changes that would allow code exceptions to modify housing for elderly and physically disabled for the duration of their tenancy. Five Year Objective: Facilitate use of County assistance and staffworkwith residents to modify 10 extsting housing units to accommodate disabled H(D-3)Add affordable housing units for single- parent households. Assign staff to carry out the following actions: a. Work with the County Housing Authority to increase the number of Section 8 certificates for single-parent families. Five Year Objective: Increase by 5 the number of Section 8 units for single parent households. Train staff and refer single parent households to shared housing program, IHN or other local assistance providers. City of Burlingame H-69 General Plan DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMNNT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE IIOUSING. b. Work with the Human Invesfinent Project for Housing, a non-profit housing corporation which administers a home-sharing program which is available for Burlingame residents. Develop literature regarding availability of housing programs; distribute to Burlingame residents. Continue City funding assistance. H(D4)Provide affordable studio or one-bedroom units for single occupants. a. Expand the multiple family overlay zone to include the C-3 zoned areas between Murchison Avenue and Peninsula Hospital and between Magnolia Avenue and Ogden Drive, and the area on the east site of Marco Polo Way. b. Develop revisions to the code to encourage development of studio and one-unit apartments with reduced parking requirements when located within one-third mile of a transit hub or major bus route. Five Year Objective: Provide alfordabl e fficiency hous ing untts on selected sites: 1875 Califurnia Drive - 28 units Olfice site in R-4 overlay - 43 units South of Burlingame Ave. - 70 units Total: 141 affordable eficiency units Rezone properties with residential overlay Amend code to modify parking requirements when within a transit hub area H@-S)Provide local share of support for county- wide homeless programs Continue financial contributions to agencies which provide service to the homeless population in San Mateo County; continue to allow group facilities for the homeless in conjunction with church facilities as a conditional use; continue to support financially and work with local and non-profit providers in San Mateo County to provide homeless shelters county-wide. Five Year Objective: Continue Jinancial support of County- wide programs. Staff continue to facilitate process necessary to provide such services tn the City. GOAL E: REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERYE ENERGY AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS. H@-l)Energy conservation for major residential construction In all plan checking for new residential construction and major additions, apply Title 24 energy conservation requirements; where possible in planning developments, require structural and landscaping design to make use of natural heating and cooling. Five Year Objective: Add energt conservationfeatures to 250 residences. City of Burlingame H-70 General Plan DRAF'T HOt F"I,EMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL E: REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS. H@-2)Community awareness of conservation benefits Distribute brochure on available energy conservation programs and measures at the Planning counter to all residents planning to expand or build new residences. Five Year Objective Provide energ) conservation information to public. GOAL F:ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFO RDABILITY OF H o USING. Promote development of at least772 units (448 market rate units and 111 very low income, 56 low income and 157 moderate income units) between 2001 and 2006. Five Year ObjectiveH(F-l)Encourage development of housing on selected sites to serve all income levels Encourage housing development by making sure zoning is in place, amending zoning code requirements to provide incentives for affordable/transit oriented housing (by reducing parking requirements/changing height and bulk restrictions); and fast tracking zoning and building permit processing for housing applications on the following sites: Vacant and Underused Sites: 1800 El Camino Real - 0.9 acre, zoned C-l/R4 Overlay 1875 Califomia Drive - 0.33 acre, zoned C-l/R-4 Overlay 1870 El Camino Real - 0.78 acre, zoned C-llR-4 Overlay Site 4 - additional 0.5 acre zoned C-l/R-4 Overlay Transit Oriented Sites now Commercial 1730 Marco Polo Way - 0.9 acre zoned C-3 1777 Murchison Drive - 1.3 acres zoned C-3 1825 Magnolia Drive - I .40 acre parcel zoned C-3 Area along California Drive - North of Broadway zonedC'2 Transition Areas Rollins Road South of Bloomfield - zoned R-3 East side of Carolan next to North Park Apartments - 5.38 acres zonedC-2 Area south of Budingame Avenue zoned C-l City of Burlingame H-71 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL F: ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING. H(F-2)Promote development of potential housing sites a. b Maintain and update the area-by-area land use surveys, note changes in vacant and underutilized sites; share information with potential residential developers. Promote development of housing units by offering incentives for guarantees of long-term affordability (such as reduced parking requirements/increased heighQ. Five Year Objective Provide assistance and incentives to encourage development of the sites listed in H(F-1). a. b. c d. H(F-3)Identify sites for mixed use and small one- bedroom or studio apartments. Encourage development of sites in C-R zone and where there is commercial zoning with a residential overlay; modiff regulations to encourage mixed use and provide incentives for keeping units affordable; consider parking reductions for locations within one- third mile of transit hubs or along transit corridors; consider regulations for shared parking for mixed use with different dayinight parking demands. Five Year Objective Encourage development of 141 units in the C-R zone and selected sites identified in H(F-l) Provide incentives for development of units in C-R zone and on sites identiJied in H(F-I) above. Encourage mixed use and livdwork units in the area south of Burlingame Avenue. Amend the zoning code to provide opportunities for live/work and mixed use proiects H(F-4) Second-unit Amnesty Continue the second unit amnesty program beyond its initial two-year time frame (2001 - 2003), extend to 2006; provide second unit applicants with information on participation in the San Mateo County Rental Rehabilitation program which provides rehabilitation Ioans for units which are available to tenants with low or very low incomes; consider expansion of the program by changing the eligibility date to qualify for second-unit amnesty Five Year Objective: Process I 25 applications for second unit amnesty; Provide opportunities for rehabilitation of these units City of Burlingame H-72 General Plan r.T HOIISING EI,EMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM GOAL F: ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF.HOUSING. H(F-5)To expand the stock of affordable housing Staff contact known non-profit housing corporations and religious institutions to make them aware of City interest, familiarize them with the opportunities available in Burlingame, and assist in processing where applications are required; encourage use of private foundation grants tofund affordablg unqf. Five Year Objective: Encourage development of affordable units on sttes identified in H(F-L) above. H(F-6)Section I Program Work with San Mateo County Community Services and Housing Authority to provide Burlingame a proportionate share of Section 8 funds; distribute information about program to potential property owner and renter participants. Five Year Objective: Current number of Section I units is 55. Attempt to increase by an additional 25 units (total of 80 units). H(F-7) First-time Homebuyer Program Continue to participate in cooperative CDBG agreement with San Mateo County to provide Burlingame residents with the opportunity to participate in the first-time homebuyer program (Mortgage Credit Certificate) funded by CDBG. Five Year Objective: Obtain assistance for I 5 Burlingame residents. Table }J-12 -of 2001 - 2006 Element Work TotalRehabilitationConservationABAG Fair Share New Construction Income Category 2052272110lltVery low ll5 r99562856Low 1680l1157159Moderate 0 698448250242Above Moderate 127030019856s774Total City of Burlingame H-73 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM Table H-13 - Note: Numbers in parentheses ( ) are included in the total for H(F-l) for new construction and H(A-7) for rehabilitation. Rehabilitation ConservationProgramNew Construction 20H(A-2) Housing Rehabilitation H(A-5) Acquisition 20 H(A-7) Design Review 2so (75\H(C-2) Density Bonus H(D-l) Elderlv (30)8 (Section 8) l0H(D-2) Disabled H0-3) Sinsle Parent 5 (Section 8) H(D4) EffrciencyUnits (14r) H(E-l) Enersy Conservation (2s0) H(F-1) New Development on Selected sites 772 H(F-3) Mixed Use (50) H(F4) Second Unit Amnesty 125 H(F-6) Section 8 25 (Section 8) H(F-7) First time homebuyer l5 300TOTAL772 198 City of Burlingame H-74 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM TABLE H.14 - SUMMARY OF HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVE ACTION Funding Source Responsible Agency Time- Frame H(A-l) Maintenance of Public Improvements Continue maintenance program for public facilities Maintain and enhance streets, water and sewer facilities General Fund, Gas Tax Fund Planning, Public Works, City Manager 2001- 2006 Rehabilitate 20 housing units Referral to County assistance through Code Enforcement Program General Fund, CDBG funds Code Enforcement, Planning and Buildine 2001- 2006 H(A-3) Discourage condominium conversion No conversion of existing rental stock to condominiums Continue to prevent condominium conversion through implementation of existing zoning controls N/A Planning 2001- 2006 H(A4) Prevent conversion of residential units to non- residential use Retain existing rental housing Amend code to require conditional use permit for any project where residential units are proposed to be replaced by non residential use Public Planning 2002 H(A-s) Ensure affordability of existing units Encourage acquisition and rehabilitation of 20 apartment units for long- term affordable housing Participate in County housing programs, provide refenals to non profit housing corporations to acquire, rehabilitate and manage apartment units CDBG Planning, City Manager, City Council 2001- 2006 H(A-6) Determine code compliance, structural deficiencies of homes upon sale Continue to provide assistance to potential home buyers City staff to assist with research of residential records City Planning and Building 2001- 2006 H(A-7) Residential Design Review Process 250 applications for residential design review Continue implementation of single family design review and zoning ordinance regulations controlling mass and bulk Applicatio n Fees Planning Department and Planning Commission 2001- 2006 H(B-l) Public awareness of anti- discrimination laws Continue referral activities through code enforcement program Continue code enforcement activities and refer complaints to California Department of Fair Employment and Housing; refer complaints about housing discrimination to La Raza Central Leeal City funds, literature from other agencies Code Enforcement, Planning, Building 2001- 2006 H(C-l) Referral to Housing Assistance Programs for eligible employees Continue to refer eligible employees to programs Train staff about current opportunities, disseminate information regarding programs, refer eligible residents to County Offrce of Housing and Community Development City funds, CDBG funds Planning 2001 - 2006 City of Burlingame H-75 General Plan H(A-2) Housing Rehabilitation DR F'T HOIISING EI ',MENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM PROGRAM QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVE ACTION Funding Source Responsible Agency Time- Frame H(C-2) Provide incentives for inclusion of affordable dwelling units in residential development Provide 75 new housing units at transit hubs a. Amend zoning code to provide incentives for residential projects which include affordable units and are within 1/3 mile of a transit sktion b. Establish partnership with local non-profit agency to insure the units remain affordable Private, City Planning 2003 H(C-i) Encourage public agency partuerships to provide housingfor groups like teachers, public and hospital employees. Provide 50 new housing anits in the vicinity of public agency workplaces Contact public agencies and encourage lhem to include a provisionfor employee housing in anyfacility upansion plans; have city staff assist interested agencies by sharing information on ho using funding available from CDBG und other sources and with technical planning asststanca Public Agencies Planning 2001- 2006 H(D-1) Increase affordability for elderly households Provide 30 affordable units for the elderly; Increase number of Section 8 units for elderly by 5 units. a. extend the second unit amnesty program for five years; b. Continue to allow curbside disabled parking spaces in neighborhoods. c. Coordinate with San Mateo County Housing Authority to increase number of Section 8 units for Burlingame's elderly population. d. Continue updating and distributing Senior Resources Handbook.. e. Expand incentives for new senior housing by reducing parking requirements for assisted living projects. f. Continue City financial support to non-profit agencies which administer housing programs for seniors; work with these agencies to facilitate implementation of their programs in Burlingame. g. Encourage non-profit housing groups to develop housing by facilitating project processing and providing incentives in the zoning regulations. h. Refer seniors who are homeowners to the Human Investment Project for Housing Home Sharing Program, to find eligible tenants to share their City funds, private funds, volunteers Planning, City Manager, City Council, Parks and Recreation Department 2003 for code changes; 2001 - 2006 for ongoing City of Burlingame H-76 General Plan DR AT'T HOTISINC RI,T',MENT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM PROGRAM QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVE ACTION Funding Source Responsible Agency Time- Frame H(D-2) Improve livability of housing units for disabled population Modiff l0 existing housing units to accommodate disabled Formulate and consider code changes that would allow exceptions to modiff housing for elderly and disabled City funds for code changes, private funds for alterations Planning, City Council 2003 H(D-3) Add affordable housing units for single parent households Increase by 5 the number of Section 8 units for single parent households Refer single parent households to shared housing Drogram Work with County Housing Authority to increase the number of Section 8 certificates for single- parent households; Refer eligible residents to HIP Housing for shared housing HUD fi,mds, City tunds Planning, City Council 2001- 2006 H(D4) Provide affordable studio or one- bedroom units for single persons Provide l4l affordable efficiency units for single persons a. Expand the multiple family overlay zone to include the C-3 zoned areas between Murchison Avenue and Peninsula Hospital and between Magnolia Avenue and Ogden Drive, and the area on the east site of Marco Polo Way. b. Develop code revisions to encourage development of studio and one-unit apartments by reducing parking requirements when located within one-third mile of a transit hub or major bus route. City funds for rezoning and code revisions, private/H CD A4TC funds for developm ent Planning, City Council, private developers 2003 H(D-s) Provide local share of support for county-wide homeless programs Continue support of County-wide programs Continue financial contributions to agencies which provide service to the homeless population in San Mateo County; continue to allow group facilities for the homeless in conjunction with church facilities as a conditional use; continue to support financially and work with local and non-profit providers in San Mateo County to provide homeless shelters county-wide. General Fund Ciry Council, Planning 2001- 2006 H(E-l) Energy Conservation for Residential construction Add energy conservation features to 250 remodeled and new residences Apply Title 24 energy conservation requirements to all new residential construction and major additions; require structural and landscaping design to make use of natural heating and cooling City funds, developm ent fees Planning, Building 2001- 2006 H(E-2) Community awareness of conservation benefits Provide energy conservation information to public Distribute brochure on available energy conservation programs and measures to all residents planning to expand or build new residences. PG&E, State and Federal grants Planning, Building 2001- 2006 City of Burlingame H-77 General Plan NPAE'T ITNITSIN(: E'I ,E'Mtr'NT HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM PROGRAM QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVE ACTION Funding Source Responsible Agency Time- Frame H(F-1) Encourage development ofhousing on selected sites to serve all income levels Promote development of atleastTT2 units (448 market rate units and 324 affordable units) Encourage housing development by making sure zoning is in place, amending zoning code requirements to provide incentives for affordable/transit oriented housing, fast track processing of housing applications on selected sites. City funds, applicatio n fees Planning, City Council 2003 for code changes 2003- 2006 for develop ment H(F-2) Promote development ofpotential housing sites Provide encouragement and incentives to encourage development of selected sites. Maintain land use surveys, contact owners of selected sites, promote development by offering incentives for guarantees of long-term affordability City funds Planning 2001- 2006 H(F-3) Identifr sites for mixed use and small one- bedroom or studio apartrnents Encourage development of 50 units in the C-R zone; Provide incentives for development of units in C-R zone and on selected sites. Encourage development on C-R zoned sites and commercial sites with a residential overlay; modify regulations to encourage mixed use and provide incentives for keeping units affordable. Encourage mixed use in the area south of Burlingame Avenue. Amend the Toning code to provide opportunities for live,/work and mixed use proiects. City funds Planning, City Council 2002 for zoning changes 2003 for code amendm ents H(F4) Second Unit Amnesty Process 125 units for second unit amnesty; provide opporhrnities for rehabilitation of those units Extend the second unit amnesty program to 2006; provide applicants within information on the County's rental rehabilitation program; consider expansion of the program to include more units by changing eligibility date. City funds; private funds; CDBG funds Planning, Building 2002 for changes to second unit amnesa Drogram H(F-s) Expand the stock of affordable housing Encourage development of 50 affordable units on selected sites Staff contact known non-profit housing corporations and religious institutions to make them aware of City interest, familiarize them with the opportunities available in Burlingame, and assist in processing where applications are required. Encourage use of private foundation grants to fund affordable units. Non-profit and public sources Planning, City Manager, City Council 2001- 2006 H(F-6): Section 8 Program Current number of Section 8 units is 55; attempt to increase by an additional 25 units (total of 80 units) Work with San Mateo County Community Services and Housing Authority to provide Burlingame with a proportional share of Section 8 funds; distribute information about program to potential properly owner and renter participants City funds; HUD Section 8 funds Planning, City Manager 200t- 2006 City of Burlingame H-78 General Plan 2001- 2006 DR F'T I{r)ITSIN(: EI,T',MENT PROGRAM QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVE ACTION Funding Source Responsible Agency Time- Frame H(F-7) First- time homebuyer progmm Obtain assistance for l5 Burlingame residents Continue to participate in cooperative CDBG agreement with San Mateo County to provide Burlingame residents with the opportunity to participate in the fi rst-time homebuyer program. CDBG funds, tax credits Planning, City Manager, City Council 2001- 2006 City of Burlingame H-79 General Plan HOUSTNG GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTION PROGRAM DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION Government Code Section 65400(bxl) requires that each jurisdiction provide an annual report to the State legislature which provides information on the status of the implementation programs identified by the Housing Element. This report shall include the status of general plan and implementation efforts, including progress in meeting the share of the regional housing need, and efforts to remove government constraints to development. The following pages include the format which the City of Burlingame will use to document its progress on implementation of the programs identified in the Housing Element. The Evaluation Form is broken into three sections: 1. Status of programs which target new construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of housing units; 2. Status of programs which provide ongoing assistance to residents and developers and provide improvements to residential areas; and 3. Programs which require zoning code amendments to facilitate the production of new housing. The annual report will be submitted to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research and the Department of Housing and Community Development by July l't of each year. These reports will be used to document progress in meeting the identified housing goals and objectives, facilitate housing element revisions and updates and assist in subsequent reviews of the Housing Element. City of Burlingame H-80 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION CITY OF BURLINGAME HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION FY INTRODUCTION The Purpose of this report is to summarize Housing Program accomplishments for the fiscal year and how these accomplishments contribute toward the goals of the 2001 Housing Element. The report consists of the list of goals taken from the Housing Element followed by a description of program activities for this fiscal year which have worked toward these goals. Housing Element Goals GOAL A:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOURAGING MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF THE CITYIS NEIGHBORIIOODS AND HOUSING STOCK. GOAL B:PROVIDE VARIETY AND CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS. GOAL C:PROYIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, TEACHERS, HOSPITAL WORKERS AND OTHERS IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY WHO WORK IN BURLINGAME. GOAL D: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PURPOSE HOUSING. GOAL E:REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE ENERGY AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS. GOAL F:ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING. Targets For New Construction, Rehabilitation And Maintenance Of Units Following is a list of the programs and targets identified to produce new units, rehabilitate units and maintain units as affordable in the 2001 Housi Element U PROGRAM H(A-2)Housing ReElbilitation Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Targel Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation 7 13 20 Maintenance TOTAL 7 13 20 City of Burlingame H-81 General Plan [.T HOIISING EI,NMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION PROGRAM H(A-s) Ensure affordability of existing units Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation 15 5 20 Maintenance TOTAL 15 5 20 PROGRAM H(A-7) Residential Design Review PROGRAM H(E-l) Energy Conservation for Residential construction Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation 175 175 Maintenance TOTAL 175 175 PROGRAM H(D-l) Increase affordability for elderly households Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation Maintenance 3 2 5 TOTAL 3 2 5 PROGRAM H(D-2) Improve livability of housing units fordrsabled population Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation 10 10 Maintenance TOTAL 10 10 H(D-3) Add affordable housing units for single parent householdsPROGRAM Very Low Income Low Income Moderste Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation Maintenance 3 2 5 TOTAL 3 2 5 PROGRAM HG-l) Encourage development of housing on selected sites to serve all income levels PROGRAM H(D-2) Improve livability of housing units for disabled population (10 new units included below) PROGRAM H(D-4) Provide affordable studio or one-bedroom units for single persons (l4l efficiency units included) PROGRAM H(F-3) Identi& sites for mixed trqe and small one-bedroom or studio apartments Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction 111 56 157 448 772 Rehabilitation Maintenance TOTAL lll 56 157 448 772 City of Burlingame H-82 General Plan I)RAFT TINITSINC E',I ,F',MRNT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION Ongoing Programs The following is a list and description of programs where the City provides ongoing assistance, but that there is no numerical ofthe service PROGRAM H(F-4) Second Unit Amnesty Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Targel Aehieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation Maintenance 85 r65 250 TOTAL 85 165 250 PROGRAM H(T-6): Section 8 Program Yery Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation Maintenance t9 5 I 25 TOTAL t9 1 25 PROGRAM HG-A First-time homebuyer program Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved New Construction Rehabilitation Maintenance 15 15 TOTAL 15 15 TOTAL ALL PROGRAMS VeryLow Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Total Target Achieved Targel Achieved Target Achieved Target Achieved Target Achteved New Construction 111 56 157 448 772 Rehabilitation 22 28 0 175 225 Maintenance 110 174 16 0 300 TOTAL 243 258 r73 623 1297 PROGRAM H(A-l) Maintenance of Public Improvements STATUS:In residential neighborhoods continue the maintenance and enhancement of public facilities such as streets, water supply and drainage by allocations from the general fund, gas tax revenue and, where appropriate, conditionq of development. PROGRAM H(A-3) Discourage condominium conversion STATUS:Maintain the existing zoning controls which prohibit conversion of residential rental projects with fewer than 2l units to condominiums, and which contain strict regulations for conversion of more than 2l units to condominiums. PROGRAM H(A-6) Determine code compliance,structural deficiencies of homes upon sale STATUS:Continue program that assists in research ofresidential records upon the request ofrealtors or potential home buyers. City of Burlingame H-83 General Plan DR F'T HOTISING Ef ,F',MENT ANNUAL PROGRES S EVALUATION PROGRAM Public of anti-discrimination lawsawareness STATUS: Planning Department code enforcement activities; provide informaiion handouts; inform the public and local realtors about equal housing laws and recourse available in case of violations; refer complaints to California Department of Fair Employment and Housing; refer complaints regarding disirimination to La Raza Central Legal,anonprofit community law center which works with local tenants to Continue Code Enforcement Officer and coordination with resolve landlord/tenant issues. PROGRAM Referral to forAssistance STATUS:Train staff about current opportunities; brochures and contact information to eligible residents who inquire about availability of programs. Refer eligible reiidents to CDBG programs administered by the County make available andOffice PROGRAM Provide local share of for homeless STATUS:Continue financial contributions to service to the homeless population in San Mateo County; continue to allow group facilities for the homeless in conjunction with church facilities as a conditional use; .oniinue to support financially and work with local and non- profit providers in San Mateo County to provide homeless shelters which provideagencies PROGRAM awareness of conservation benefits STATUS:Distribute brochure on available energy and measures at the Planning counter to all conservation programs residents to or build new residences. the stock of affordablePROGRAM STATUS: religious institutions to make them aware of City interest, famitiarize them with the opportunities available in Burlingame, and assist in processing where applications are corporations andStaff contact known non-Profi t housing Programs Requiring Code Amendments The-following progrims require implementation of zoning code amendments to facilitate the ofnew PROGRAM conversion ofresidential non-residential useunitstoPrevent Status:Target Date:2002Amend zoning code to require project where residential units a conditional are proposed use permit for any to be replaced bY non-residential use. units in residentialPROGRAMinclusionaffordableofforincentivesProvide Status:Target Date:2003 station. Forge a partnership with a local non-profit agency to for densitytocodetheAmendopportunitiesprovidezonrng and./orlnbonusesrequirementsparkingchanges(through includewhichresidentialforrestrictionsprojects)height/bulk ofmile transitwithint3areandlocatedunitsaffordable insure the units remain affordable City of Burlingame H-84 General Plan required. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS EVALUATION PROGRAM H(F-2) Promote development of potential housing sites a. Maintain and update the area-by-area land use surveys, note changes in vacant and underutilized sites; periodically contact owners of these parcels to determine intentions for the properties in these zoning districts. b. Promote development of housing units by offering incentives for guarantees of long-term affordability (such as reduced parking requirements/increased heieht). Target Date:2003 Status: City of Burlingame H-85 General Plan DRAF'T HOIISING E,I,EMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATA SOURCES DATA SOURCES United States Census 2000 Historical United States Census Data Employment Development Deparfrnent Sustainable San Mateo County Report Card, May 2001 Association of Bay Area Governments, Projections 2000 Environmental Impact Report, 301 Airport Boulevard, Draft EIR Project Description, Table II.2 BT Commercial Metroscan San Mateo County City of Burlingame Building Department, Monthly Permit Activity Report City of Burlingame Code Enforcement, City Attorney's Office San Mateo County, Human Services Agency, Housing Division National Interfaith Hospitality Network Quarterly Statistics, January 2001 to June 200t City of Burlingame Finance Deparlment Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance, Transportation Action Program, Burlingame, California, December 2000 National Coalition for the Homeless, June 1999 Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing Policy Development, 2000 Income Limits, March 2000 7 8 9 10 l1 t2 13 t4 15 16 City of Burlingame H-86 General Plan DR AF'T HOTISING EI,F"MENT APPENDICES APPENDIX A - COMMUNITY PROFILE AND PROJECTIONS Growth Proiections Over the years, Burlingame's population has remained fairly stable. There are currently 28,158 persons in the City of Burlingame. Historically, the total population decreased 4o/obetween1970 and 1980 and population has increased steadily since then. The highest rate of population increase since 1970 was 5.1% between 1990 and 2000. However, the net increase in population for the Burlingame since 1970 is 3o/o.lncomparison, San Mateo County's population has increased bV 27 o/o since 1970, and the county grew by 8.9% between 1990 and 2000. r'2 POPULATION GROWTH: 1970 -2000 Burlingame, San Mateo County, SF Bay Region Source: U.S. Census 2000 and Historical U.S. Census Data The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) prepares population projections for all the cities in the nine Bay Area counties. They project that the population of Burlingame will reach 3 1 ,500 people by 20 I 0. ' This is an I | .9o/o increase for 2000-201 0. PERCENT CHANGE IN POPULATION 11.9% 12.0o/o 10.0o/o 8.0o/o 6.0% 4.0% 2.0o/o 0.0% -2.00h 4.00/o -6.0% Source: U.S. Census 2000 and AGAG Projections 2000 ElPercent Population lncrease Burlingame I Percent Population lncrease San Mateo Gounty Oa,-r EoglN6o.gfoo RE oooNo Ot Olti o Ol Ot F{o @ O)r{ o 00 Olr-loN O) F{ Place Historical Percentage Change 1970 1980 1990 2000 20r0 projected 70 -80 80-90 90-00 70-00 00-10 projected Burlingame 27,320 26,r',ll 26,80r 28, I 58 3 1,500 4.2o/o +2.4%o +5.lYo +3.lyo ll.9o/o County 557,361 587,329 649,623 707,t6l 779,700 +5.4yo +l0.6yo +8.9o/o +27%10.3o/o Region 4,558,200 5,179,793 6,023,577 6,783,760 7,631,400 +13.60/o +13.6%+12.6%+48.\yo 12.5o/o 10.6%8.90h 5.1Yo City of Burlingame H-87 General Plan 5.4o/o I I DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES Ponulation bv Race - Although Burlingame is not the most diverse city in the Bay Area (it is 81" out of 183 communities in the nine county Bay Area Region), ethnic diversity in the City has been steadily increasing since 1970. In 1980, 93.3% of the city's residents were white, in 1990 87.8% were white, and today 76.9% are white. Today the largest ethnic group in the City by proportion of the population is Asian (14.3%). By comparison, in 2000 the population of San Mateo County is 59.5%White and 21.4% Asian.''' The trend towards increased ethnic diversity may impact future housing needs based on cultural differences in household composition. For instance, many cultures have households charucteized by the presence of extended family. This may affect the preference for housing type and size, or the number of households classified as overcrowded. popuLATIoN oF RACE IN BURLINGAME - 1980, 1990 AND 2000 Race/ Ethnicity Total Population Burlingame Total Population San Mateo County Percentage of Population Burllngame Percentage of Population - San Mateo County 1980 1990 2000 2000 1980 1990 2000 2000 White * 24,426 23,529 21,648 420,683 93.3%87.8%76.9% Black 109 179 296 24,840 0.42%0.7%1.2%3.s% American Indian 53 103 65 3,140 0.20%0.4%0.23%0.4% Asian 913 2,371 4,016 151,087 35%8.8%t4.3%21.4% Other ** 672 619 2,133 l07,4ll 2.6%23%7.6%t5.2% TOTAL 26,173 26,801 28,158 707,161 99.99Yo 1000h 100.2v,100% * The White race category may include the ethnic category of Hispanic or Latino. ** The Other race category includes two or more races. Source: U.S. Census 2000 Pooulation bv Ase School-age Children: Burlingame is experiencing an increase in the number of school age children. Of the current 28,158 persons, 19.2% (5402) are children under 18 years old. This compares to l6.4Yo of the population in 1990 and 16.3%o of the population in 1980. The 2000 Census indicates that 5.6Yo of the total population is under 5 years of age, 10.6% are elementary or middle school aged (5-13 years old) and4.4o/o are high school aged (14 to 19 years old). This data would indicate that there has been an increase in enrollment in elementary and middle schools in the past ten years; and that high school can expect an increase in enrollment over the next 10 years.''' Over 60 years old: Based on Census 2000 data, the number of people 60 years old and older in the City has been steadily decreasing over the past 20 years. The 2000 Census shows that 19.lyo of the total population in Burlingame is comprised of people 60 years of age and older. The City of Burlingame H-88 General Plan 59.s% DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES percent of the city's residents in this age category in 1990 was23.60/o and in 1980 it was26.10/o. However, in 1970 the City had its largest proportion of children under 18, and also its smallest proportion of residents over 60. Current data shows us that the trend in the next decade appears to be in the direction of the 1970 pattem, with the number of residents over 60 continuing to decrease as the number of school age children increases in the next decade. l'2 Median Age:The median age is the midpoint in the city's population distribution. In 2000, the median age in Burlingame was 38.4 years. The 2000 census data shows that, as has been true in the past, Burlingame's population is slightly older than that of San Mateo County (Burlingame's median age is currently 38.4; San Mateo County's is 36.8). The median age data also shows the shift in age of the city's population. While in the past decade there has been an almost a 3% increase in children 18 or less, there has been over an 8.5 0/o increase in the adult population 35 to 59 years of age. This reflects the fact that over the decade there was movement in the resident population of families with young children replacing the city's over-60 population (which dropped by almost 7%). This is confirmed by the fact that the total population also grew between 1990 and 2000, to a pattern similar to that of the 1970's."' POPULATION OF AGE IN BURLINGAME _ 1980, T99O AND 2OOO Age Group Age Breakdown - Burlingame Percentage of Population Percent Change 1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 1990-2000 Under l8 4,265 5,402 16.3%16.4%t9.2%+2.9% l8-34 7,411 7,480 6,667 28.32%27.9%23.76%-456% 35-59 7,673 8,643 10,695 29.32%32.2s%37.98%+8.66% 60-59 6,824 6,291 5,394 26.1%23.5%19.15%-6.95% TOTAL 26,173 26,801 28,158 l00Yo l00Yo l00o/o Source: Historical U.S. Census Data Emnlovment and Education: Employment rate: As of Aprilz00l, of the 17,660 members of Burlingame's work force, only 190 (1.1%) were unemployed. Countywide, the unemployment rate was I.7Yo andthe unemployment rate for the entire state of California was 4.7o/o. The unemployment rate for Burlingame has been fairly steady, averaging 2.8oh, since 1990. Historically, the last period of time that the state of California experienced such low unemployment rates was in the 1960's.3 The 1990 Census showed that the 56.9% of Burlingame's employed population are employed in the retail and services sectors. Job Growth.' The extremely low unemployment rate in the city and county is due to the explosive expansion of high technology industries, many of which are based in the Bay Area Region. Although the Burlingame does not number any high technology companies among their major employers, the growth of that industry has impacted other industries, namely the hoteVmotel, retail and restaurant industries, that form the foundation of Burlingame's economy. City of Burlingame H-89 General Plan 4,397 DR E'T I{rIITSIN(: E',I .RME',NT APPENDICES The number ofjobs in San Mateo County has increased by 101,400 since 1995. This represents a 33 Yo increase and the highest recorded 5-year increase in jobs in the history of the county. The services industry showed the largest and fastest growth.of all industries from 1995-2000 in San Mateo County, growing by 13% in the last year alone. * INDUSTRY GROWTH SAN MATEO COUNTY 1995-2OOO Government Finance, lnsurance and Real Estate Services Trade Transportation and Public Utilities Manufacturing Construction and Mining $Yo 5% 10% 'liYo 20Yo 25Yo 30o/o 35Yo Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 Job growth can be translated into housing demand by dividing the anticipated number of new jobs by the regional average of workers per household. ABAG projects 960 new jobs in Burlingame by 2005.5 In addition, the Burlingame City Council approved plans on August 7, 2001, for a 488,000 SF office complex on the drive-in theater site. It is reasonable to predict that if built, two of the four phases of the project (244,000 SF) and the day care center (10,000 SF) might be completed by 2005. The projected number ofjobs generated by the completion of these twi phases and the day care centeiwould be 1071jobs.6 Therefore, total number ofjobs will increase by 2031jobs by 2005. With the 1990 Census data showing there are an average of 1.34 workers per household and that approximately 20% of jobs in Burlingame are held by local residents, the potential housing demand generated by the new jobs will be 303 residential units by 2005. A depression in the technology sector in 2001 has resulted in a downturn in the local economy. Many technology-based companies have cut back on their work force and the unemployment rate ior the county has increaied by l.lyo,to 2.7 o/o,the highest rate in 2 years.3 Vacancy rates for commercial office space have also increased by 18-23o/o in San Mateo County.T These trends would indicate that the growth rate for new jobs for 2000-2005 will not be nearly as high as what was experienced in the county in the past 5 years, so the number of new housing units to accommodate new jobs could be substantially less than 303. City of Burlingame H-90 General Plan DRAF'T ISING APPENDICES MAJOR FMPLOYERS IN BURLINGAME Peninsula Hospital Hyatt RegencY Hotel San Francisco Airport Maniott Hotel Guittard Chocolate (Rollins Road) Sky Chefs, Inc. Park Plaza Hotel Sheraton GatewaY Hotel Doubletree Hotel Coen CompanY (Rollins Road) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 2555 550 480 230 200 r85 160 150 111 BURLINGAME'S EMPLOYED POPULATION BY INDUSTRY 3.4% govemment 11.9o/o transportation,etc. 12.6%9.1% manufacturing 22.1% trade 6.5% mining and construction 34.8o/o services tr TransPortationand Public trservices'34.8% I Trade (incl. retail)' 22.1% IGovernment '3.4% I Manufacturing' 9.1% trMining and Gostruction' 6.5% ElFinance, tnsurance and Real Estate'12'60/o Utilities- 11.9o/o Source: Historical U.S. Census Data Educatiow eurringame residents are becoming more educated. In 1990 42.5% of the city's residents had completed 4 years of college. This represents a 70Yo increase in this number since 19g0. In San Mateo6o"n y, 39.9%of th-e population has completed a 4-year college degree or hieher. From 1gg0 to 1gg0 the portion of tir..ity'r population with a high school diploma also ro"seby 4o/o.2 City of Burlingame H-91 General Plan Burlingame's Maior Employers: The largest single employer in Burlingame is Peninsula iorpitir, followed uv *unv orthe major hotels located in the city that serve San Francisco International Airport. Repiesented among the major employers are also several manufacturing firms in the Rollins Road industrial area'" DRAF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT APPENDICES Household characteristics Household size: Average household size in Burlingame has remained fairly stable since 1970 and has historically been lower than San Mateo County's average household size. Currently, the average household size in Burlingameis2.2l persons and in San Mateo County itis2.74 persons. The average household size in San Mateo County for owner-occupied units is 2.83 persons and for renter occupied units it is 2.59 persons. Compared to the region, Burlingame's average household size is small; the average household size in the nine county San Francisco Bay Region is 2.69 persons. I The lower household size in Burlingame reflects the large proportion of the city's housing stock (51%) that is apartment units. Income: The median household income for San Mateo County is $74,900.'6 This is a 6l o/o increase from the median income of $46,437 in 1990. The median income for Burlingame has historically been slightly lower than that of the County. In this same 10-year period average housing costs have increased by an average of 168% for single family homes and 105% for condominiums, which means that the disparity between housing costs and affordability is growing. RISE IN MEDIAN INGOME GOMPARED TO AVERAGE HOUSING COSTS IN BURLINGAME E Median lncome IGost of Single Family Homes trCost of Condominiums 300% 2s0% 200o/o 150o/o 100o/o 50% 0o/o 1990-2000 Source: U.S. Census 2000 and Metroscan San Mateo County Female Heads of Households: lnthe last 10 years the number of female heads of household has decreased in Burlingame; moreover the proportion of them with children under 18 has also declined. The 2000 Census indicates that there are 967 female householders, 7 .7Yo of the total population, with no husband present. Of these female householders,45o/o (436) have children under l8 years old in the household. In 1990, there were 923 female householders (13.7o/o of the total pop;lation), and of thes e,400/o(369) had children under l8 years old in the household.r Overcrowding.. A common standard for overcrowding is the presence of one or more persons per room. The 1990 census indicates that4.5o/o of Burlingame households were considered overcrowded and this was a substantial increase compared to l.4o/o of overcrowded households in 1980 and to 1.6%o in 1970. One factor in the increase of overcrowding in Burlingame may be the increase in the cost of housing. Between 1990 and 2000 the average cost of a housing has more than doubled and it is logical to assume that the percent of overcrowded households will City of Burlingame H-92 General Plan 1680/" DRAFAHOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES also have doubled. A lack of affordable housing can force people to buy or rent housing that is too small or to share housing with others to spread the cost of rent. Total Number of Housing Units: The total number of housing units in Burlingame as identified in the 2000 Census is 12,869 units. The 1990 Census identified 12,914 housing units. Based on the census information the number of housing units has decreased slightly from 1990 to 2000. However, city records based on building permits issued and finaled indicate that the number of housing units in Burlingame has actually increased by 158 during this time period, or a 1.2%o increase in total dwelling units.e Between 1994 and 1999,152 housing units were added to the housing stock. Of these 152 units, there were 102 multiple family units added, 2 single-family homes added, and an elderly housing for 48 residents. The City of Burlingame has added an average number of 53 dwelling units a year since 1970. NEW UNITS ADDED PER TEN.YEAR PERIOD IN BURLINGAME '1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 Source: City of Burlingame Building Departrnent, Monthly Permit Activity Report Occupancy; Of the total number of housing units in the city, the 2000 Census identified that 97.2% were occupied, and 2.8o/o were vacant. The vacancy rate in Burlingame for rental units was2.2o/o while the vacancy rate for owner occupied units was 0.4%. This represents a significant decrease from the 1990 vacancy rate of 4.5%. A 5% vacancy rate is considered good to provide flexibility in the housing market so that the worst units become vacant and there is a choice of units to moderate rents. The current overall vacancy rate for Burlingame of 2.8o/o indicates that the demand for housing exceeds the available supply. The vacancy rate for San Mateo County in 2000 was slightly lower than Burlingame, at2.5o/o, and for the Bay Area region was 3.5% tr Net number of units added City of Burlingame H-93 General Plan 255 196-GA'' DRAF'T HOTISING EI,FI,MENT APPENDICES ACTUAL AND STABLE VACANGY RATES IN BURLINGAME 5.0o/o 4.0o/o 3. 2.0Yo 1.0o/o 0.0%1990 2000 Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 Owner/Renter Occupied: Of the occupied units, 47.9% of the units were owner occupied, while 52.1% were renter occupied. This represents an increase of owner occupied units from 1990 and 1980 (455% and 45.7o/o respectively). This increase may be the result of the fact that the majority of multiple family units constructed in Burlingame in the past decade have been condominiums, as opposed to apartment units. Burlingame is the only city in San Mateo County with more than one-half its housing stock in multiple family buildings, totaling 51.6%multiple family housing. Single family residences account for 48.4%o of the total units. HOUSING TYPES IN BURLINGAME 51.60/o 48.4o/o trSingle Familiy Homes I Multiple Family Homes Source: City of Burlingame Building Department Condition of Housing Stock: Burlingame's housing stock is well-maintained. The 1994 housing element estimated that less than SYo of the housing stock was in need of rehabilitation and less than lo/o were in need of replacement. Building permit activity shows that in the last year alone, 2000, almost 4.8Yo of all residential units applied for a building permit to make maintenance Elowned units vacancy rate Irented units vacancy rate City of Burlingame H-94 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES repairs or improvements. From 1994 to 1998 a yearly average of 6.5% of all residential units applied for these types of building permits.e The City also added a part-time Code Enforcement Officer in 1998 to monitor and address community complaints, code violations, and health and safety standards. The Officer estimates an average number of 2 cases a year related to housing deficiencies. Based on the Officer's observations, he estimates there are 3 housing units with serious deficiencies.l0 San Mateo County offers the HOME program for housing rehabilitation. The City of Burlingame advertises HOME through their second unit amnesty program. The program is funded through the Federal block grant monies and the County decides each year which projects will be funded. Eligible housing financing activities include:rl . acquisition. new construction financing o moderate rehabilitation (< $25,000 per unit) o substantial rehabilitation ($25,000 or greater per unit) o tenant based rental assistance o relocation expenseso site improvements o project soft costs Cost of Housing: The extremely low vacancy rate in Burlingame indicates that the demand for housing exceeds the supply. This has resulted in a dramatic increase in the cost of housing in the past decade. The median cost of a single family dwelling in Burlingame has more than doubled since 1990, from $302,516 to $811,418.8 The median cost of a condominium in Burlingame has increased since 1990 from $186,083 to $382,005.8 In Burlingame, where 51.6% of the housing stock is multiple family units, the average monthly rent is $1,950. In Burlingame, the cost of housing has more than doubled in the past ten years where the median income has only increased by 6l%. The median price for a single-family home for San Mateo County in 2000 is $601,235. The median home price for California is $248,000 and for the nation is $167,000. The average price for a condominium in San Mateo County is $360,000. The average monthly rent in San Mateo County is $1,956.4 City of Burlingame H-95 General Plan DR r.T Irr)I ISINC T"I,EMF:,NT AVERAGE APARTMENT RENTS FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY APPENDICES <O-1-bedroom apartment *2-bedroom apartment A 1- bedroom Burlingame , 2-bedroom Burlingame $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 1991 1994 1997 2000 Sourc e: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $o $o MEDIAN SINGLE FAMILY HOME/ CONDOMINIUM PRICE !N SAN MATEO COUNTY 1991 1994 1997 2000 Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 I r-r I -I-Single-Family House *Condominium o Single-Family House Burlingame o Condominium Burlingame H-96 General Plan r- =l City of Burlingame DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT APPENDICES HOUSING NEEDS Affordabilitv Burlingame was listed by the California Association of Realtors in 2001 as one of the top ten most expensive cities to live in the United States. The past decade, and in particular the six year period since the City's last housing element update, has been characterized by an economic boom in the Bay region. The increase in the number ofjobs resulting from the explosive growth in technology-based industries in the region can be translated to a dramatic increase in demand for housing. The 1994 Housing Element shows that based on the Census data available in 1990, 86% of Burlingame's existing rental units were affordable to very low, lower, and moderate-income families. The 2000 Census is not yet available; however based on the fact that the rent for a one bedroom apartment has increased by ll9% in the last decade while the median income has only increased by 6lo/o,it is likely that the percent of affordable units in Burlingame has decreased.* COST OF A SINGLE.FAMILY HOME $1,200,000 $800,000 $400,000 $811,418 $601,000 ,000 , $o 2000 Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 MetroScan for San Mateo County The dramatic increase in the cost of a median-priced house shows that median-income families can no longer afford to be homeowners. A lack of affordable housing has many implications for the future housing needs of Burlingame and San Mateo County: it limits the ability of first time home buyers to purchase in the area; it causes fixed-income renters to slip below the poverty level; it can cause overcrowding and homelessness; and it forces people employed in the area, particularly service workers, to live in more affordable neighboring counties, increasing commute times and distances; and resulting in traffic congestion and air pollution. City of Burlingame H-97 General Plan $167,000 trNation ECalifornia trSan Mateo County trBurlingame DRAF'T HOTISING EI,F"MENT APPENDICES Snecial Needs Housins This section of the housing element will address the housing needs of special groups which are di{ferent than the general population in terms of the special assistance they require to find appropriate and affordable housing. This group is broken down into the elderly, disabled, female- head of households, family housing, farmworkers, the homeless, students, service workers and first time homebuyers. Senior Housing: The population of Burlingame's senior residents has been steadily declining as a proportion over the past 20 years. This is in contrast with the trends in San Mateo County and the Bay Area, which shows an increase in the proportion of the population over 60 years old. The Census 2000 shows that 1,9.1% (5,394) of Burlingame's population is over 60, while in 1990, 23.6% (6,291) of the population was over 60. Based on data from Census 2000 of the l2,5ll households in the City,33.2o (4,154) of all households are headed by someone over 65 years old. Of that percentage,l}oh are headed by individuals over 65 years old living alone. Currently, there are over 13 facilities in Burlingame that cater to the special living and provide medical assistance for the needs of older individuals. These facilities have the capacity to care for and house over 500 persons or 9.27 % of the city's elderly population. The newest facility was approved in 1994 and completed in 1997. This facility has the capacity for 48-beds to serve the needs of the elder population, particularly those with Alzheimer's disease. Even with a decrease in the number of older people in Burlingame, there is still a need and a desire by the City to ensure that their older residents are afforded the opportunity for safe, healthy and affordable housing. To help fill this need, the City Council created and appointed residents to the Burlingame Senior Commission. The mission of the Senior Commission includes the following: Be aware of the current needs and projected future requirements of Burlingame's and San Mateo County's senior citizens as key elements affecting the seniors' quality of life: - Housing/Security/Transportation - Medical Benefits - Recreation/Employment/Education - Public Benefits (Federal, State, County, City, etc.) - Health Services - Aging Research and Development Advise the Burlingame City Council on policy matters relating to and affecting seniors - take advocacy positions on legislation and programs. Assemble information and expertise for the Commission to act as a clearinghouse to support seniors and their caregivers and improve community understanding of senior-related activities, issues and programs. Facilitate access to activities and public and private program support systems that are available locally and nationally. Educate the community and decision-makers on senior activities, needs and issues. a o a a o City of Burlingame H-98 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES o Develop programs that involve seniors in the community and recognize them as a resource and vital part of the community. The Senior Commission, with the assistance of the Burlingame Recreation Department, also produces a Handbook for senior residents. This handbook provides information and contacts for housing assistance programs available in the city. These progmms are offered by private and nonprofit agencies and provided by San Mateo County through the Federal Community Development Block Grant funding. With information derived from the Senior Commission, the City of Burlingame is better suited to address the needs of their elderly population. Disabled: The 2000 Census identifies the portion of the population which are housed in group quarters. This population is broken down into institutionalized and noninstitutionalized populations. The current population of institutionalized individuals is 428 or l.5Yo of the total population of Burlingame. Noninstitutionalized individuals make-up a very small proportion of the population with only 58 persons or 0.2o/o of the total. Based on the breakdown from the 1990 Census,9lYo of the group quarters were nursing homes, 3ohwere other instifutions and 5.9o/owere other noninstitutional quarters. Using the percentages from the 1990 Census, we can estimate from the 2000 Census that a majority of institutionalized individuals are those in nursing homes with a small percentage making up other noninstitutional quarters.l'2 Female-Head of Households.'The number of female heads of household in Burlingame has decreased over the last ten years, as has the proportion of them with school age children at home. Census 2000 shows thatT .7o/o (967 households) of the total population are female heads of household, with 45% (436 households) of these having children under 18 years of age in the household. In 1990, female heads of household represented 13.7oh (1689 households) of the population,and40Yo (676) ofthese had children under 18 years ofage. In even with a reduction in the population of female heads of households in Burlingame, there is still the need to provide suitable housing. With the high cost of housing, there is a need for special assistance to female-head of households and especially those with children. Some of these households are assisted through the Section 8 program and other programs throughout the county such as Shelter Network and The Samaritan House. Family Housing: Family housing is made up of a variety of different housing groups. These groups include female-head of households, single persons, married couples, large families with five or more persons, families with children and non-family households. In Burlingame, the average household size is 2.93 persons per household comparedto 3.29 persons per household in San Mateo County. Of the l2,5ll households in Burlingame,55.6oh or 6,954 are family households;24% of those families have children under the age of 18. Non- family households makeup 44.4% or 5,557 of the total households in Burlingame. Non-family households include householders living alone and householders over 65 years in age living alone.l City of Burlingame H-99 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES Homeless: The annual report by Sustainable San Mateo County estimates that in 1998 there were 4,545 homeless persons in San Mateo County. Of these homeless, 3,694 were adults and 851 were children. The total number of homeless has not increased significantly since the 1994 count, which totaled 4,499 persons. However, this count does not include doubled-up households: those where potentially homeless persons are living with family or friends. The number of doubled-up households has increased from 613 persons in 1996 to 18,769 persons in l99g.4 Although it is difficult to track the number of homeless by city since they are generally a mobile population, the Call Primrose Center of Burlingame estimates that there are 5 permanent homeless residents in the Burlingame and the 1990 Census recorded 2 visible homeless persons in the city. Data from the San Mateo County Interfaith Hospitality Network indicates that the category with the highest risk of homelessness is female-headed single parent households and that the main causes for homelessness are the break-up of families and the loss of employment, respectively.l2 HOMELESS IN SAN MATEO COUNTY 1s000 10000 E Homeless I Doubled-Up Households5000 0 1996 2000 Source: Sustainable San Mateo County Yearly Report Card, 2001 Within Burlingame, the Call Primrose Center provides referrals to homeless persons for assistance with food and jobs, as well as information and referrals to many other homeless programs. The Center is privately supported, mainly by the Burlingame United Methodist and First Presbyterian Churches, but also by the cities of San Mateo and Burlingame. The Burlingame City Council also approved, in November 2000, a conditional use permit for the Interfaith Hospitality Network to operate a program for homeless families that includes a day center at 1720 El Camino Real and overnight shelter on a rotating basis. Three churches in the city participate along with three churches in other nearby cities. The program assists five homeless families with children and up to a maximum of 14 persons. There are no permanent homeless shelters for single individuals in Burlingame. However, there is a new temporary seasonal shelter that operates from December through March located in South San Francisco, approximately 2.5 miles to the north of Burlingame, in a building on the grounds of the San Francisco International Airport. Burlingame contributed $30,000 to the construction of this facility and contributes annually for its operation. a City of Burlingame H-100 General Plan DRAF'T F',I,EMENT APPENDICES Resources for the homeless in San Mateo County include: The City of Burlingame contributes yearly to community groups. In the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the city contributed $ 2,000 to the Call Primrose Center, S 2,000 to the Shelter Network of San Mateo County, $ 3,000 to the Samaritan House, and $ 7,000 to the seasonal shelter.l3 The National Coalition for the Homeless reports that despite a strong overall economy in the United States, homeless numbers have been increasing since 1979. Studies have shown that two trends are key factors in this increase: no growth in real wages for minimum wage eamers and a lack of affordable housing. Despite increases in the minimum wage, the real value of the minimum wage in 1997 was 18.1% less than in 1979.rs Housingfor Farmworkers.'Housing elements are required by state law to evaluate the housing needs of farmworkers. ABAG projects that there will be no additional need for farmworker housing in San Mateo County. The 1990 census shows that only l% of Burlingame residents were employed in farming, forestry and fishing occupations, which includes wholesale and horticulture businesses. This low percentage, combined with the fact that Burlingame has no agricultural lands within or adjacent to its incorporated limits, indicates that the number of actual farmworkers in Burlingame is very small and therefore, no there is no need for farmworker housing. Service lYorkers and Pubtic Employees: The housing needs for workers in these categories of employment should be assessed because they represent a significant portion of the jobs offered in the city and because the average wage for these workers currently places them in the categories of very low-income to median income in San Mateo County. In San Mateo County, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartmentis 62Yo more than the monthly income *ud. by a minimum wage earner.3/ Based on figures from the Employment Development Department, workers in the employment categories that form the core of Program Name Location Service Provided Category of Homeless Assisted CaII Primrose Burlingame Referral center All Interfaith Hospitality Network Burlingame Transitional Housing Families with children Samaritan House San Mateo Referral center All Shelter Network Proqrams Family Crossroads Daly Ciry Transitional Housing Families Haven Family House Menlo Park Transitional Housing Families Redwood Family Housing Redwood City Transitional Housing Families l"'Step for Families San Mateo Emergency and Transitional Housing Families Maple Street Redwood City Emergency and Transitional Housing Single Adults Clara-Mateo Alliance Shelter Menlo Park Transitional Housing All Daybreak Shelter Redwood City Transitional Housing Teens County Winter Shelter So. San Francisco Seasonal Temporary (Dec.- Mar.) All- primarily assist Single Adults City of Burlingame H-101 Ceneral Plan RT Hr)I]SIN(I F:,I,EMENT APPENDICES Burlingame's economy may be earning an hourly wage that makes them unable to afford housing. For example, the average annual pay in 1999 for a person employed in the retail trade in San Mateo County is $26,614. ' An annual income of this amount places a one-person family in the retail industry in the very low-income category. In the services industry, the average annual income in 1999 was $57,309. This annual income places a family of four with a single wage earner in the services industry in the low-income category. Based on housing costs in San Mateo County, this same family of four could only afford to rent the average priced one-bedroom apartment. The City of Burlingame employs 322 persons in either a fulI or part-time capacity. This makes the City of Burlingame the fourth largest employer in the city. The median city employee income is $69,564. This is l2l% less than the income needed to afford the median priced house for sale in 2001 in Burlingame.t3 A survey by the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance Transportation Action Program done in 2000 found thatTTo/o of employees of the city live outside of Burlingame. According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission the average number of vehicle miles traveled to work in the San Francisco Bay region in 2000 is 18.7 miles. A total of 19% of the City of Burlingame's employees commute from a distance of 20 miles or farther. Currently, the City of Burlingame offers financial assistance for employees using mass transit to commute, but does not offer any housing assistance for employees. First Time Home Buyers: First-time homebuyers may be excluded from the housing market in San Mateo County because of the high down payment required. A median priced home in Burlingame would require a20o/o down payment of $162,283. San Mateo County offers several programs for first time home buyers, including a second mortgage loan program (START) and a mortgage credit certificate progrirm (MCC). However, the START program was initiatedin1994 with first-time funds and is currently inactive until the initial qualifiers repay enough of the loan money to re-open the program. The MCC program requires that the purchase price of a home cannot exceed $269,000, where in Burlingame the median price of a condominium in 2000 is $382,005. Current Housins Production The current housing need obligation for the city is 565 dwelling units between 2000 and 2006. Of these, 166 or 29 percent should be for very low and low income households. Between 1990 and 2000 the city added 158 net new dwelling units.'All of these were market rate. From January 2000- May 2001 the city had 57 net new dwelling units under construction and a net of 13 new dwelling units for which building permits had not been issued. Together these proposed units would reduce the city's housing need number by 70 dwelling units to 495 net new dwelling units needed. Of the new units added between January 2000 and May 2001, one was low income affordable and 69 were market rate. At-Risk Assisted Housing Development Inventory of At-Risk [Jnits: Section 65583 (a) (8) of the State Government Code requires an analysis of assisted housing developments that are eligible because of the expiration of Federal loan limitations to change from low-income to market rate housing during the next ten years. The City of Burlingame H-102 General Plan DR AF'T HOIISING EI,EMENT APPENDICES section further defines assisted housing and describes the analysis to be undertaken. In Burlingame, there are no locally subsidized units at risk, since no mortgage revenue bonds have been issued for many years, the city has not approved any density bonuses with financial assistance, does not have and in-lieu fee program. ABAG Housins Needs Determination State law requires that in preparing a Housing Element each community consider the housing needs of people of all income levels. State law requires that a housing element quantiff existing and projected housing needs for persons of all income levels within each community, including the community's share of the regional housing need by income level. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is responsible for preparing estimates of local and regional housing need based on factors prescribed by State Law (Section 65884 or Article 10.6). The factors included in the division of the regional housing need into individual community assignment are: market demand for housing, availability of suitable sites and public-facilities, commuting pattems, housing type and tenure, and housing needs of farm workers. In addition ABAG looks at regional and local vacancy rates and at housing values and rents as indicators of market demand. Household projections are based on employment opportunities, availability of sites and commuting patterns. Type of housing is based on census data and regional projections. ABAG has the responsibility of projecting the housing needs for the 2001-2006 period based on the factors identified in State law. The five-year housing need numbers include market rate housing as well as units for those with lower incomes. The projected need number is the number of dwelling units needed to provide for the total expected household growth and Burlingame's share of ABAG's projected regional housing need. The projected need number for the planning period (2001 - 2006) for Burlingame is 565 dwelling units. Following are the projected housing need numbers for 2001 through 2006 for the city of Burlingame by income category: Need Income C Source: Association of Bay Area Govemments, letter ABAG Executive Certification of the Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) Appeal Process and Final RHND Allocation, March 23,2001. No. of UnitsIncome Category Income for Family of 4 110 56 157 ru 565 75 Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Current need Average Yearlv Need $37,450 $58,300 $89,900 Market Rate City of Burlingame H-103 General Plan DR AF'T HOIISINC F],I,EMF],NT APPENDICES Federal Income Limits The Federal government provides updated information on income limits for eligibility for Federally funded housing programs by County. For 2000, the Federal government set the following income limits for San Mateo County. Federal Income Limits *Median Income standard is based on a family of four NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Very Low Income 26,200 29,950 33.700 37,450 40,4s0 43,4s0 46,454 49,450 Lower Income 40,800 46,650 52,500 58,300 63,000 67,650 72,300 77,000 Median Income 52,450 59,900 67,404 74,900r,80.900 86.900 92,900 98,850 Moderate Income 62,950 71.900 80,900 89,900 97,100 104,300 I I1,500 I18,650 City of Burlingame H-104 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX B - GUIDE TO ENERGY CONSERVATION THE CITY OF BURLINGAME'S GUIDE TO EI{ERGY CONSERVATION \/ rF CITY. BURLINGAME C..'LIPORNIlt q QpoRereE t City of Burlingame H-105 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES INTRODUCTION Since the deregulation of energy companies in 1998, the price of energy in California has skyrocketed. With such an increase in prices, energy costs are becoming a substantial portion of housing costs. Effective energy conservation measures built into or added to existing housing can help residents manage their housing costs over time. This packet provides residents of Burlingame information that can assist them in lowering the cost of their energy bills and conserving energy. WHERE WE USE OUR ENERGY Electricity use is consumed by five primary sectors. Those sectors include commercial, industrial, governmental, agricultural and residential with commercial and residential sectors consuming a majority of the usage. Together commercial and residential sectors comprise approximately 70oh of statewide electricity load at peak statewide use times. The following graph represents the amount of summer residential electricity usage by category or appliance. Residential Summer Usage 4s% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15o/o 10o/o 5% 0o/o .HE8.HIgEE8H} EEgSEEEi*E5:Ee' 6.==.EE tr =.=q,I E H = City of Burlingame H-106 General Plan DRAFT F',I,EMF:,NT APPENDICES RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SAVING TIPS No Cost Tips l) Eliminate Wasted Energy - Turn off all appliances, lights and equipment when not in use. You can also save by unplugging electronic devices and chargers and turning off computers and printers at the power strip. 2) Clothes washer and dryers - Do only fullloads. Wash in cold water and clean dryer lint trap after each use. To save even more energy, line dry your clothes' 3) Water heater - Lower the temperature to 120 degrees. 4) Dishwasher - Set temperature to 140 degrees. Only wash full loads, use the energy saver, air dry cycle or open the door and let dishes dry naturally. 5) Air conditioner - Clean filters regularly and provide shading for air conditioner unit. A poorly maintained air conditioner uses l0% - 30o/o more energy than necessary. 6) In summer - Set your thermostat to 78 degrees. 7) Avoid running large appliances such as washers, dryers and electric ovens during peak demand hours from 5:00am - 9:00am and 4:00pm - 7:00pm. 8) Close blinds, shades and drapes at night to reduce the amount of heat lost through windows. 9) Close your fireplace damper when the fireplace is not in use. 10) Clean and check the refrigerator coils at least twice ayear. Dirty coils make it harder for the refrigerator to work. Low Cost Tios 1) Use energy efficient lighting - Replace regular incandescent light bulbs with Energy star compact fluorescent light bulbs. Buy Energy Star certified table lamps, light fixtures or torchieres. Please be aware that compact fluorescent light bulbs contain mercury and are hazardous to human health and the environment if damaged. 2) Wrap your water heater - Wrap your water heater with a water heater blanket and insulate the pipes for additional savings. 3) Plug up your home's leaks - Caulk, seal or weather-strip around windows and doors, seal ducts, plug gaps around pipes, fans and vents and install foam gaskets behind outlet covers. 4) Install energy-saver showerheads - You can reduce hot water use and water costs by 10% - l5% without sacrificing comfort. 5) Install an Energy Star thermostat - This can save you up to 3% of your electricity use. 6) Install shade devices - Shade screens and window tints are an effective way of providing passive cooling for your home. 7) Repair all leaky faucets and toilets. Investment Tips 1) Use energy efficient windows - Replace old windows with new, high performance efficient windows. Check the National Fenestration Rating Council's (NFRC) standards for new windows 2) Install a whole house fan. City of Burlingame H-107 General Plan DRAFT EI,RMENT APPENDICES 3) Install a ceiling fan. 4) Purchase Energy Star appliances. 5) Increase attic insulation - Insulate your attic to R-30 standards. 6) Replace your air conditioning unit, furnace, refrigerator and water heater if more than 10 years old. 7) Install Energy Star hardwired lighting fixtures' Landscaping Ideas Residential landscaping is a cost effective and beautiful way to lower your energy bills and to help conserve energy. A well-designed landscape can cut summer and winter energy costs dramatically, protect your house from winter wind and summer sun, reduce the consumption of water, pesticides and fuel used for landscaping and lawn care and help control noise and air pollution. Plant shade trees - Plant deciduous trees (trees that lose their leaves in the winter) on the east, south or west side of a house, the sunniest sides, can reduce your cooling load in hot summer months by up to 30%o. Also, vines or trellises placed directly on a west wall can lower the wall's surface temperature by as much as 40 degrees. Ground covers and lawns can also help keep your home naturally cool. A lawn is 10-15 degrees cooler than bare ground and also assists in the absorption of rain water. Be sure to select drought-tolerant plants when considering your landscaping to save money and water. California Energy Commission Emerging Renewables Buydown Program 1516 Ninth Street, MS-45 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 1-800-555-7794; e-mail: renewable@energy.state.ca.us: website: wrilw.energ,v.ca.gov Ciry of Burlingame H-108 General Plan Alternative Energy Sources Opporfunities exist for residents of Burlingame to take advantage of state offered rebates for the installation of renewable energy generating systems. Renewable energy generating systems can provide residents with an energy source that is less polluting, less susceptible to blackouts and the fluctuations of the energy market. Currently, the State is offering rebates on the installation of renewable energy systems at the rate of $4.50 a watt or 50Yo of the cost, whichever is less. Systems included in this program are: o Photovoltaics (PVS) - Solar cells that convert sunlight directly to electricity. . Small Wind Turbines - Wind turbines with an output of l0 kilowatts or less. Wind turbines are usually not a feasible option in residential areas. o Fuel Cells - Devices that use a chemical process to convert renewable fuels like hydrogen into electricity. . Solar Thermal Electricity Systems - Systems that use solar heat to generate electricity. Please contact the California Energy Commission for more details on the California Renewable Energy Buydown Program at the DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES REBATE PROGRAMS AVAILABLE TO RESIDENTS Local Enersv Sunnlier PG&E) The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) supplies all of the electric and gas needs to the residents of Burlingame. PG&E offers an assortment of programs that provide residents with the opportunity for energy conservation. The following are some programs that are available to residents of Burlingame, including programs for residents who qualiff as low income. Programs Available to All Residentso l-2-3 Cashback - A PG&E residential program that offers free suggestions on energy savings tips, low-cost home improvement projects and investments you can make to save energy in the future. o Residential Aonliance Rebate - PG&E offers rebates to homeowners who purchase an Energy-Star appliance. This program includes the purchase of an Energy-Star refrigerator, clothes washer/dryer, dishwasher, air conditioner, prograrnmable thermostat and heating and cooling equipment. The amount of the rebate varies from appliance to appliance.o Residential Contractor Program - PG&E's residential contractor program makes available to both contractors and homeowners cost-saving vouchers. The vouchers aid in the purchase of energy efficient home improvements. Rebates range from $30 - S750 depending on the voucher. o 20120 Energy Rebate - Residential customers who reduce their Summer 2001 electricity load by 20% are eligible for a20o/o credit on their bill.o Energy Efficient Mortgage - This program allows residents to make improvements that increase the energy efficiency of their home and finance these improvements through their mortgage. o Miscellaneous Programs - PG&E also offers rebates for the purchase and installation of compact fluorescent lights, Energy Star floor lamps, hardwired indoor fluorescent fixtures, hardwired outdoor fluorescent fixfures, motion sensors, gas water heaters, electric water heaters, prograrnmable thermostats and whole house fans. All of which are available for purchase through PG&E. Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes (Low income residents are individuals and families who earn less than half the current median income ($74,900) in San Mateo County.) o Enersv Partners Prosram - PG&E's free weatherization Drosram available to low income customers. Qualified, pre-screened contractors make weatherization repairs and improvements for residents who qualiff for the program. o CARE (California Alternate Rates for Energy) - PG&E's discount program for low income households and housing facilities. The CARE program provides a20oh discount to low- income residents meeting certain standards. It also insures that low income residents are not affected by new surcharges. The CARE program is broken into five categories: 6. CARE Residential Single Family Program 7. CARE Sub-Metered Tenant Program 8. CAREfor Qualified Nonprofit Group Living Facilities 9. CAREfor Qualified Agricultural Employee Housing Facilities City of Burlingame H-109 General Plan DRAF'T HOT E',I,F',MNNT APPENDICES 10. CARE Education and Outreach o REACH (Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help) - The REACH program is a one-time energy assistance program sponsored by PG&E and administered by the Salvation Army to assist low income customers particularly the elderly, disabled, sick, working poor or unemployed, in paying for their energy needs. o Strategic Alliance Project - The Strategic Alliance Project examines community, regulatory and political issues affecting PG&E's low income customers and works with community organizations to determine how these clients can benefit from their programs. For additional information on PG&E programs and how to apply, please visit their website at www.Dse.com The State of California Califurnia Energt Commission Rebate Programs - Open to all residents of Califomia, independent of their income. Rebates are provided based on current funding. o a Emerging Renewables Buy-Down Program - Rebate upon the installation of a renewable energy system in the home. This includes small wind turbine generation systems, fuel cell powered generation systems, solar thermal electricity generation systems and photovoltaics powered generation systems. The current rebate is $4.50 per watt or 50% of the system cost (whichever is less). Solar Energy and Distribution Generation Grant Program - Provides rebates to residents for the installation of solar battery backups and storage systems, solar water heaters, internal combustion generators, solar swimming pool heating equipment and other distributed generation systems. Rebates vary based on the generation system. Programsfor Residents Who Qualify with Low Incomes . LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) - The LIHEAP block grant is funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services and provides two basic type of services. Low income residents who are eligible can receive financial assistance to help offset the costs of their energy bills and/or have their homes weatherized to make them more energy efficient. This program is accomplished through 3 components. 7. The Weatherization Program 8. The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) 9. The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP) For additional information on these programs and the California Energy Commission, please visit their website at www.energy.ca.gov CONTACT INFORMATION AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES California Department of General Services, energy informationl www.flexyourpower.ca.gov California Energy Commission: I -800-5 5 5 -7 7 9 4; www.energv.ca. gov City of Burlingame H-ll0 Ceneral Plan DRAF'T F'I,E',MRNT APPENDICES Califomia Independent System Operator: www.caiso.com Consumer Energy Center, California Energy Commission: www.consumerenergycenter.org The Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Clearinghouse (EREC): 1-800-363-3732; www.eren.doe.sov Energy Star Products: www.energystar.gov Energy Star Rebates: www.consumerenergycenter.org/rebate/index.php Energy Quest, California Energy Commission: www.energy.ca. gov/education Environmental Protection Agency: www.epa.gov Pacific Gas and Electric: www.pge.com The following resources provide information on landscaping for energy efficiency. American Association of Nurserymen (AAN) 1240I Street, NW, Suite 500 Washington, D.C.20005 QAD78e-2e00 AAN serves as a network of organizations representing garden centers, landscaping and horticultural interests. American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) 4401 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20008 (202) 686-27s2 ASLA is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge, education and skill in the art and science of landscape architecture. National Arbor Day Foundation (NADF) 100 Arbor Avenue Nebraska City, NE 68410 NADF is a nonprofit educational organization dedicated to tree planting and conservation. NADF sponsors National Arbor Day each spring. City of Burlingame H-l11 General Plan D E'T HOIISING EI,EMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX C - HOUSING FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES IN SAN MATEO COUNTY There are several grants and low interest loan opportunities that are available for housing rehabilitation, construction, acquisition, and preservation from the State Deparftnent of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Some of these are accessed through the County Offrce of Housing and Community Development. Listed below is a brief summary of some of these progftrms and the contact information for each. 1. CalHome Program The intent of this program is to assist low and veryJow income households to become or remain homeowners. This is done by offering grants to local public agencies and nonprofit developers to help individual households obtain defened-payment loans; direct, forgivable loans to assist development projects involving multiple ownership units, including single family dwelling subdivisions. Contact: Denise Boswell (916) 327 -3586 or dboswells@hcd.ca.gov 2. Califurnia Indian Assistance Program (CIAP) This program provides technical assistance to tribal govemments and Native American communities to obtain funds from other agencies for housing, infrastructure, community and economic development projects. Contact: (916) 445-4727 3. Caldornia Self-Help Housing Progran (CSHHP) CSHHP provides grants to local government agencies and non-profit corporations that provide technical assistance to low and moderate income families that wish to build and rehabilitate their homes with their own labor. Contact: Programadministration(916)445-0877 Management of existing loans (916) 324-8654 Fiscal service on existing loans (916) 327 -3717 4. Downtown Rebound Planning Grunts Program This program offers funding to cities and counties to assist in the construction of in-fill housing in downtown areas, and the redevelopment and conversion of commercial and industrial spaces into residential units. Contact: Robert Maus (916) 323-3180 or rmaus@hcd.ca.gov 5. Downtown Rebound Program Similar to the new Downtown Rebound Planning Grants Program, this existing program provides low interest loans to local public agencies, in addition to for-profit and nonprofit corporations, limited equity housing cooperatives, Indian reservations and rancherias, and limited partnerships in which an eligible applicant or an affrliate of the applicant is a general partner, to revitalize urban downtown areas with the addition of residential units. Contact: Sharon Sarno (916) 327-8255 or ssamo@hcd.ca.gov 6. Emergency Housing Assistance Program (EHAP) EHAP offers grants to local government agencies and nonprofit corporations that provide emergency shelters and supportive services for homeless individuals and families. Contact: (916) 445-0845 City of Burlingame H-112 General Plan DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDICES 7. Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program (FESG) Similar to the EHAP, the purpose of the Federal Emergency Shelter Grant Program is to provide transitional housing for homeless individuals and families in addition to emergency shelter and supportive services. These funds are targeted for smaller communities that do not receive shelter funds directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Contact: (916) 445-0845 8. HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) The Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is one of the most active loan programs operating in the county. The intent of the program is to assist cities, counties and nonprofit community housing development organizations (CHDOs) to create and retain affordable housing. San Mateo County HOME Consortium (comprised of l6 San Mateo County cities, including Burlingame) receives federal block grants from which they fund housing projects. The San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development is the lead agency for the Consortium. The participating cities, along with the unincorporated area of the County compete for funding from this grant. contact: (916) 322-0356 or San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development Jack Marquis (650) 802-5035 Marina Yu (650) 802-5039 Norman Pascoe (650) 802-5008 9. Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) This program provides defened payment loans to local public entities, for-profit and nonprofit corporations, limited equity housing cooperatives, individuals, Indian reservations and rancherias, and limited partnerships in which an eligible applicant or an affiliate of the applicant is a general partner, to construct new low income housing, or rehabilitate and preserve permanent and transitional rental housing for lower income households. Contact: Anne Gilroy (916) 327-2886 or agilroy@hcd.ca.gov 10. State Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) As stated in number 6 above, San Mateo County's CDBG Program (called an Urban County program) is based on the participation of l6 cities (through cooperation agreements) and the unincorporated area of the County. The program is a federal block grant with the County's annual entitlement grant calculated by a formula with the following components: (l) population, (2) extent of poverty, (3) overcrowded housing units, (4) number of housing units built before 1940. Projects funded with CDBG funds must primarily benefit very low and low- income persons. Contact: ProgramAdministration (916) 445-6000 San Mateo County Office of Housing and Community Development Jack Marquis (650) 802-5035 Marina Yu (650) 802-5039 Norman Pascoe (650) 802-5008 City of Burlingame H-l 13 General Plan FT ITrlI ISINC RI,[',MF',NT APPENDICES I l. Urban Predevelopment Loan/Preservation Program This program provides short-term loans to local government agencies, nonprofit corporations, cooperative housing corporations, and limited partnerships where all general partners are nonprofit mutual or public benefit corporations, to finance the initial costs of preserving existing affordable housing developments for their existing tenants. Contact: New loans (916) 445-0877 or agilroy@hcd.ca.gov Fiscal service on existing loans (916) 327-3717 12. Urban PredevelopmentLoan/Jobs-Housing Balance Program This program provides short-term loans to local government agencies and nonprofit corporations, including cooperative housing corporations, to finance the initial cost of constructing, converting, preserving or rehabilitating assisted housing developments near transit stations. Contact: New loans (916)445-0877 or agilro),@hcd.ca.gov 13. Human Investment Projectfor Housing (HIP) a. Homesharing Homesharing is when two or more unrelated people share either a house or apartment, each having his or her own sleeping room while they share the common areas. This program provides matches for home providers and home seeker who will may rent as well as home seekers who agree to provide services to the home providers in lieu of paying rent. b. Property Development One of HIPs affiliates, HAND is a recognized Community Housing Development Organization and is therefore eligible to receive federal funding for housing development. With this funding HIP Housing works with local jurisdictions to identiff, acquire, and rehabilitate existing multi- family properties in order to expand the availability of affordable housing and upgrade and maintain existing affordable housing. c. Home Equitv Conversion This program provides loans and educational counseling to older homeowners to help them make use of the equity in their home without requiring them to move. The funds that result from a home equity conversion can be used for living expenses, home repairs, in-home care and to improve the quality of life for the elderly homeowners. In order to qualiS for this program an applicant must be 60 years or older and own their single family home, townhouse or condo free and clear or have very small mortgage balance. Contact: (650) 348-6660 or Mailbox@HlPHousing.org 14. MTC's Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) Planning grants are available under this program, to provide funding for community planning of small-scale transportation projects such as streetscapes and pedestrian, transit and bicycle oriented compact housing developments to help revitalize local communities. MTC offers up to $75,000 per project, however a local match is required for the planning work. Contact: Ashley Nguyen (510) 464-7809 or anguyen@mtc.ca.gov City of Burlingame H-l14 General Plan NR ART ITrlI JSINC T',I,E,MT',NT APPENDICES APPENDIX D - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Note: This appendix will be added when the public review process is complete, City of Burlingame H-l15 General Plan STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE Bb 1t712002 TO: Honorable and Council S BY DATE December 28.2001 : T.arrv E. Anderson. Citv ttornev CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE RESTRICTING HOURS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING THAT CAUSES A NOISE DISTURBANCE IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BY FROM SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and consider introduction of ordinance to restrict hours for loading and unloading as follows: 1. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. 2. Waive further reading of the proposed ordinance. 3. Introduce the proposed ordinance and direct the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five (5) days before introduction. DISCUSSION: At the September 17 meeting, the City Council discussed various aspects of noise issues in the City, including leafblowers and construction hours. Among those was the issue of deliveries and loading/unloading of materials during nighttime hours. Burlingame General Plan Standard The Noise Element of the City's General Plan provides the following standard No person shall be allowed to cause any noise to be emitted past his/her property line in any manner so as to create any noise that would cause the ambient L,o noise level to be increased by more than 5 dBA. Section 4.2 The Noise Element identifies the hours of 10 p.m. to J a.m. as nighttime hours and weights that noise as being l0 times as intrusive as daytime noise (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). Section 3.1. Mayor and Council Re: Introduction of Ordinance Restricting Hours for Loading and Unloading December 28,2001 Page2 Truck Deliveries As described in the Noise Element and consistent with current City Code provisions regarding construction activity and power equipment, 7 a.m. is considered the beginning of daylight operations. Where residential neighborhoods meet commercial uses, such as near Peninsula Hospital and along Broadway, neighborhood disturbance can occur when truck deliveries are made before 7 a.m. Menlo Park limits deliveries to commercial and industrial businesses to 7 a.m. to 6 p.m on weekdays, and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekends and holidays; Menlo Park exempts food deliveries to restaurants and food retailers from these limited hours. Los Altos limits deliveries and loading/unloading to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. when a noise disturbance would occur across a residential property line. Fresno limits such deliveries to 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. unless the delivery area is completely enclosed. The 7 a.m. time start seems fairly well-accepted in other municipal codes. Because early moming deliveries may mean significant cost savings from distributors, it is probably useful to establish a bright line with appropriate exemptions that uses can follow. This may also be timely as the City begins to see more multiple use districts, where residential and commercial districts overlay. The proposed ordinance attached to this report is a starting point. It has the following key points A.Deliveries would only be restricted when they cause a noise disturbance to property in a residential district (R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4) - but not a residential overlay district such as C-R. B. The restricted hours would be 1. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.on weekday and Saturday mornings; 2. l0 p.m. to 7 a.m. on Sunday and holiday mornings. The following deliveries would be excepted from the restrictions so long as no more noise than necessary was generated: 1. Emergency deliveries for health and safety. 2. Medical equipment and consumables to be used in the following 24 hours. 3. Fresh produce to grocery stores and food establishments for usage in the following 24 hours. 4. Deliveries required during those hours by a condition of a planning approval, so long as the deliveries conform to the planning approval. 5. Collection of solid waste by a franchised hauler. D. A variance procedure would be allowed when a property owner can demonstrate that relief from the restrictions is necessary to conduct a use and there are no alternatives. However, the deliveries must conform to C. Mayor and Council Re: Introduction of Ordinance Restricting Hours for Loading and Unloading December 28,2001 Page 3 strict conditions imposed in the variance process. The Director of Public Works would oversee this process with an appeal to the Planning Commission and notice to adjacent property owners. The Council should determine if this concept is a reasonable approach and make any changes that seem appropriate. Copies of the proposed ordinance have been provided to a number of residents, Peninsula Hospital, and the Police Department. At the public hearing on the ordinance in the future, the Council will receive further discussion on how to craft the ordinance so that it meets the Noise Element's goals while meeting pressing business needs. Attachment Proposed Ordinance Noise Element Goals Distribution The Huebners The Francos The McGoughs Carole Groom, Peninsula Hospital Chief of Police Director of Public Works 1 2 ) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 t6 17 18 19 20 2l 22 Z) 24 25 26 21 28 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH RESTRICTED HOURS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING THAT CAUSES A NOISE DISTURBANCE IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT The CITY COI-INCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows Section 1. The Noise Element of the City's General Plan provides that the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. are nighttime hours and noise during those hours is considered as ten times as disturbing as during daytime hours. The residential districts of the City have expect a lower level of noise intrusion during these hours than during dal.time hours. Pursuant to the goals set forth in the Noise Element, the loading and unloading of vehicles that cause a noise disturbance to a residential district should be strictly limited during those nighttime hours. In addition, an additional quiet period free from this type of noise should be expected on Sundays and holidays. The proposed ordinance provides exceptions for emergency deliveries, medical consumables, fresh produce, or as required by a condition of a planning approval, and provides a variance process when a business has no other means of meeting its needs. Section 2. A new Section 10.40.039 is added as follows: 10.40.039 Loading and unloading limited. (a) Standard. It is unlawful to unload, load, open, close, or handle boxes, crates, containers, building materials, or similar objects in such a manner as to cause a noise disturbance across a property line into property located in a residential district between the following hours: (1) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a weekday or a Sunday andT a.m. of the following day; and (2) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a Saturday and 9 a.m. on the following Sunday; and (3) Between the hours of 10 p.m. on a day before a holiday and 9 a.m. on the holiday. (b) Exceptions. Subsection (a) does not applyto the following so long as the delivery does not cause any louder noise disturbance than necessary: i 1 2 aJ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 l5 t6 t7 18 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (1) qn emergency delivery necessary to the health and safety of the occupants of the property to which the delivery is made; or (2) Deliveries of medical equipment or consumable medical supplies that are required for usage during the following twenty-fo,ar (24) hours; or (3) Deliveries of fresh produce to grocery stores or food establishments that are required for usage or sale during the following twenty-fow (24) hours; or (4) Deliveries made at a time required by a permit approved pursuant to title 25 and made in conformance with that permit approval. (5) Collection of solid waste by a city franchisee pursuant to chapter 8.16 and in conformance with the terms fo the franchisee's franchise from the city. (c) Variance- (1) Any person may apply for a variance to subsection (a) by applying in writing to the director of public works. Applications shall be in writing upon such forms, and accompanied by such data, as may be prescribed by the director, so as to assure the full presentation of the facts involved. An application fee shall be required as established by resolution. The application shall contain a description of the property on which the loading or unloading is to occur and the relief sought. The application shall be signed by the applicant and the property owner. (2) The director may grant an application for a variance if the director finds all of the following: (A) The variance is required because there is no other time of day in which the loading or unloading can occur due to the nature of the delivery and the nature of the use of the property to which the delivery is being made; and (B) The increase in ambient L,o noise level shall not be more than 5 dBA above existing; and (C) The proposed loading and unloading will not unreasonably awaken any residents. (2) If the director determines to grant the variance application, the director shall condition the approval with those conditions that the director believes are necessary to ensure that the restrictions of subsection (c)(1) above are met including noise monitoring programs, and in any 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 l3 T4 15 16 I7 18 t9 20 2I 22 /-3 24 25 26 27 28 event, shall specify the exact time periods, location, and mode of loading and unloading during which the deliveries may occur. Upon approval, the director shall mail notice of approval of the variance to owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the exterior boundaries of the property to which the deliveries are to be made. The property owners shall be informed of their right ofappeal. (3) Appeals from the decision of the director may be made to the planning commission within seven (7) days after the public notice of the action of the director is mailed. Any member of the planning commission or council may request a review of a variance under this section by making such request to the director within seven (7) days of the date of mailing of the public notice. Upon receipt of an appeal, or a request for review by a commissioner or council member, the director shall forward the records on the matter to the planning commission at the earliest available date and cause notice of such hearing to be given as set forth in chapter 25.16. The planning commission shall consider the matter in the same manner as the standards set for the director. The decision of the director shall be final seven (7) days after the mailing of the public notice of the director's action, if no appeal is filed by any person or if no council member or commissioner requests review of the decision within that time. Any decision of the planning commission under this subsection is subject to appeal under the same process and within the same time periods as set forth in chapter 25.16. (d) Definitions. (l) Holiday. For purposes of this section, "holiday" is defined in section 13.04.100. (2) Residential district. For purposes of this section, "residential district" means a district that is zoned R- 1 , R-2, R-3, or R-4 pursuant to title 25 ,but does not include a district that is zoned C-R. Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law Mavor i 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l1 t2 13 t4 15 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of - , 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ _ day of _,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: NOES: COI-INCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C :\FILES\ORDINANC\deliverynoise.ord.wpd NOISE ELEMENT )o IIVIPLEMENTATION TMPLBMENTATION: POLICIES, GOALS AND PROGRAMS The following goals, policies and implementation programs are recornmended for adoption by the City of Burlingame based upon results of a recent Noise Questionnaire (described in Appendix C) as well as a knowledge of present and future acoustic conditions throughout the City, an understanding of present land use, and consideration of the General Plan. DECLARATION OF POLICY The City of Burlingame declares a policy of excluding and prohibiting all aruroying, excessive and unnecessary noises from all sources which are subject to its regulatory, administrative and police powers. The City takes notice that for certain intensity levels, noise is detrimental to the health, welfare and enjoyment of the citizenry. as u'ell as detrimental to the quality of the environment. The City takes special notice that it is the penetration of unwanted sound from sources not controllable by an individual household that deserve the highest priority in order to insure each person's right to peaceful surroundings. POLICY GOALS The policy goals of city-wide noise control are to: N(A): Preserve peaceful noise conditions in the city where they do exist. N(B): Reduce annoying levels of noise for existing situations; aircraft, motor vehicle and domestic animal noise were identified by a Noise Questionnaire to be the most annoying at present. N(C): Achieve a peaceful acoustic environment in portions of the city to be developed. N(D): Consider use of existing city and inter-governmental processes to accomplish noi5e control. N(E): Arrive at resultant implementation programs which are consistent with State and Federal guidelines and which are (i) legally valid, (ii) not unduly costly, and (iii) do not impose undue hardship upon residential property owners and community business interests. N(F): Foster in the citizens of all segments of the City an assurance that their concems with unwanted sound levels are of importance to the City, and publicize the existence of avenues by which these problems can be quantified and mitigated. IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMS There are many possible implementation programs which the City could employ to improve the acoustic conditions within its boundaries; a wide range of such programs is iresented in the o o City of Burlingame N-44 General Plan AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 1t7 t2002STAFF REPORT TO Honorable Mavor and cil SUBMITTED BY DATE: December 20" 2001 FROM: Lany E. Anderson. City ttornev (1) ADOPT RESOLUTION OF TNTENTION TO CONSTDER REMOVAL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM BOUNDARIES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND (2) INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING DISTRICT TO REMOVE DALY CITY FROM BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT BY SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: ( 1 ) Adopt resolution of intention to consider removal of the City of Daly City from the boundaries of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District setting public hearing on January 7,2002; and (2) Introduce ordinance to remove Daly City from District by: (a) (b) (c) Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance; Waiving further reading of the proposed ordinance; Introducing the proposed ordinance and directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 5 days before February 4,2002. DISCUSSION: At the November 19 , 2001, meeting, the City Council adopted assessments for the 2002 Y ear for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District (Resolution No. 129-2001). After hearing from concemed hotel owners in Daly City, the Council exempted hotels in Daly City from the assessments until such time as the Council has had an opportunity to hold a public hearing on removal of Daly City from the District. The Daly City hotel owners explained that there is no tourism or conference/convention business in Daly City and no interest in attracting it. There has been no interest expressed by the City of Daly City in remaining in the District. [Last year, the City of Daly City paid the assessments on behalf of the hotels.] The total hotel room count in Daly City is 183, with an additional 86 rooms scheduled to open in2002. The total assessment for Daly City hotels proposed for 2002 was $5,810, or about $700 per hotel ($58 per month). The total District assessment is $1.7 million encompassing over 14,000 hotel rooms, so the loss of Daly City will have no effect on the District's ability to deliver services or advocate tourism for the tourist and conference 8c Mayor and Council Re: Consideration of Removal of Daly City from San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District December 20,2001 Page 2 resources in the County. Reference to Daly City would be removed from District and Convention Bureau materials, but individual hotels and the Cow Palace would be able to join the Convention Bureau as associate members. The proposed resolution sets a public hearing on February 4 to consider removal of Daly City from the District. Notice will be given by publication and mailing to all of the Daly City hotels. Attachment Proposed Resolution of Intention Proposed Ordinance Distribution Anne LeClair, SMCCVB RESOLUTION NO.O 472802 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF TIIE CITY OT'BURLINGAME DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER REMOVAL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SAI\ MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Daly City consented in Daly City Resolution No. 01-34 to the inclusion of the boundaries of the City of Daly City in the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District, which was formed by Burlingame Ordinance No. 1648 on February 20,2001; and WIIEREAS, the City of Burlingame was informed onNovember 14, 200l,that the City of Daly City no longer wishes to participate in the District; and WHEREAS, the deletion of Daly City will not affect the viability of the District because Daly City is nor a vital source of revenue to the District; and WHEREAS, modification of the boundaries of the District should be considered pursuant to Streets & Highways Code $ 36541, NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find as follows: 1. The Burlingame City Council intends to consider removal of the City of Daly City from the boundaries of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District by adoption of an ordinance pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36500 and following by amending Ordinance No. 1648 (2001). Removal of the City of Daly City will not result in a change in the assessment basis for any hotels in the District that are not in the City of Daly City nor will it change the assessments for any of those other hotels for the 2002 year. 2. A public hearing on this proposed modification of the boundaries of the District is hereby set for February 4,2002, at7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at the Council's Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia. 3. The Council will receive testimony and evidence at both of the public hearings, and pursuant to Streets & Highways Code $$ 36523, 36424,36525, and36542, interested persons may submit written comments before or at either public hearing, or they may be sent by mail or delivered t2l20t2oot 1 to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010- 4. Oral or written protests may be made at these hearings. To count in a majority protest against the proposed removal of the City of Daly City from the boundaries of the District, a protest must be in writing and submitted to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California 94010, at or before the close of the public hearing on February 4,2002. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at arry time before the conclusion of that second public hearing. Each written protest shalt identiff the hotel and its address, include the number of sleeping rooms, level of service provided, and square footage of meeting space. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of Daly City as the owner of the hotel, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the hotel. Any written protest as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which objection is made. 5. Effect of Protests. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the owners of hotels within the City of Daly City that will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments within the City of Daly City, as to the proposed removal of the City of Daly City, the removal of the City of Daly City will not occur. 6. Further information regarding the District, the proposed modification, and procedures for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia, phone 650 - 558-7203. 7 . The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Daly City in accordance with the requirements ofthe Government Code and Streets & Highways Code and mailing in accordance with those requirements as applicable. , MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llhday of January 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: 212120/2001 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: NONE C :\FILES\[IotelBid\modifi cation.res.wpd aJ12120/2001 CITY CITY OF BURLINGAME SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TO REMOVE THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROYEMENT DISTRICT AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1648 NOTICE IS HEREBY G[VEN that the City Council of the City of Burlingame will consider adoption of a proposed ordinance on Monday, February 4,2002, at a public meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California, that would amend Ordinance No. 1648 to remove the area within the City of Daly City from the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District as formed by Ordinance No. 1648. The San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was formed pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36500 and following and provides an assessment process to fund tourism promotion activities in the District. The removal of Daly City hotels from the District will have a minimal impact on the overall assessment basis and will not affect of the other hotels in the District. The City Council will receive testimony on the proposed ordinance from all interested persons who appear at the Council meeting. To receive additional information about the proposed ordinance and a complete copy of the proposed ordinance, or to provide written comments, interested persons may contact the City Clerk, located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, phone (650) 696-7203. A complete copy of the ordinance is available for review at the City Library at 480 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. C :\FILES\ORDINANC\Summary\dal ycitybi d. fi n.wpd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 t4 15 16 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 z) 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE No. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO REMOVE THE CITY OF DALY CITY FROM THE DISTRICT The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1648 was adopted in February200l to form the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District pursuant to the provisions of the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, as codified in California Streets and Highways Code sections 36500 and following. (b) The City of Daly City consented to the formation of the District to include the area within Daly City's city limits. However, the City of Daly City has now expressed a desire to have its jurisdiction removed, and the City Council of the City of Burlingame duly adopted a Resolution of Intention to consider such a removal. (c) Pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36523, copies of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all hotels within the City of Daly City, and the Resolution of Intention was duly published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Daly City. (d) Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, the City Council held a public hearing in the Council Chambers at City Hall, Burlingame, regarding removal of the area within the City of Daly City on February 4, 2002. Following the hearing, all protests, both written and oral, were considered and were duly ovemrled and denied, and the City Council determined that there was no majority protest within the meaning of Streets & Highways Code sections 36523,36524,36525, and36542. Section 2. Section 4(f of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by deleting "City of Daly City" Section 3. Section 1a(a)(6) of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by deleting "Daly City" Section 4. Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by removing the City of Daly City from the boundaries to read as contained in Exhibit A to this Ordinance. Section 5. Hotels located withinthe City of Daly City are exempted from payment of any portion ofany assessments as mayhave been due and payable under City ofBurlingame Resolution No. 129-2001. Section 6. Except as expressly provided in this Ordinance, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 1648 and implementing resolutions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. This ordinance shall be published as required by law Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the - day of 200_, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held onthe day of 200_, by the following vote AYES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: NOES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS City Clerk C :\FILES\HotelBid\dalycityremov. ord.wpd E.XHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES OF SAN MATEO COT]NTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. DISTRICT IN GENERAL The San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District shall encompass all of the incorporated and unincorporated areas in the County of San Mateo, but shall specifically exclude all incorporated areas and any hotels located within the incorporated areas of the city or town limits of the following cities and towns: Town of Atherton City of Brisbane Town of Colma City of Daly City City of East Palo Alto Town of Hillsborough City of Menlo Park City of Pacifica Town of Portola Valley Town of Woodside ZONES WITHIN THE DISTRICT Zone A Zone A shall encompass all of the area of the District except that area located within Zone B as described below. ZoneB ZoneB shall encompass 1)All of the area of the District that is located south of the City of Pacifica city limits and west of State Highway 35; and All of the area within all unincorporated areas immediately adjacent to, or surrounded by, the city limits of the City of Daly City. 2) t2l7l200l STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL December 13, 2001 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 1t7 to2 9a TO: DATE: FROM SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY suBJEcr: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BURLINGAME SHO REHABILITATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(2) D EASEMENT SEWER RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Burlingame Shoreland Easement Sewer Rehabilitation project constructed by Darcy and Harty Construction of San Francisco in the amount of $323,955. BACKGROUND: OnMay 7 ,200L, Darcy and Harty Construction, Inc. was awarded the contract for replacing the sewer main in the rear easement area of the Shoreland Subdivision. This project has been completed successfully under budget. There were two change orders issued for a total of $43,764. Change Order 1 included additional sewer pipe replacement to take advantage of a low bid price. Change Order 2 included repairing a residential sewer connection. Staff is satisfied that this project is complete and recommends approval by Council. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment BUDGET IMPACT: Construction including Change Orders Construction inspection Engineering Administration Project Total $ 323,955 $ 52,000 49.045 $425,000 The remaining funds from the $455,000 budget will be used for the Balboa, Carmelita and Chapin Sewer Rehabilitation Program, City Project No. 9853(4). Donald Chang, PE Senior Civil Engineer dc c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Public Works file S:\A Public Works Dirodory\Staff Reports\98532accept.stf.wpd RESOLUTION 03_2002 SEWER REHABILITATION BY DARCY AND HARTY CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(2) RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the workdone by DARCY AND HARTY CONSTRUCTION under the terms of its contract with the City dated MAY 7 ,2N1, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 9853(2). 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certi$/ that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of January ,20fl2, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, OIMAIiONY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE fu^*l,vwt S:\A Public Vr'orks Directory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESOLLITN.ACC.wpd - crytt*k CONTRACTOR: D'ARCY HARTY CONS?. ADDRESS: 1300 CARROLL AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO CA. 9{124 TELEPHONE: l4l5l 822-5200 FAX (415) 822-0747 ***+*++11*t*t{+*r+*t+}*+**++*+****{****+**r*}* CITY OF BURLINGAME PROGRESS PAYMENT # -3- BURLINGAI''E SBONEIA}TD EASEIdEM SEWB, RE}IABILITATTON CITY PROJECT NO. -98E3--(EL DATE: FOR THE MONTH OF: PURCHASE ORDER # D6cdbG!-1J /01 Decenber- 0 L :g,rxtrry| : PRIG : AIN'I : 3I'3 : 1 : MoBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION 2 : SMOKE TESTING 3 : CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 4 ; REPIACE EXISTING CONCRETE ct RB/GUTTER 5 ; REPLACE EXISTING CoNCRETE SIDEWALK 6 : REPLACE 5n WITH 8il PEP BY PIPERBURSTING ? : INSTALL NElr 8n PEP BY HORIZONTAL BORING I I INSTALT NEw 8n PVC BY oPEN TRENCH 9 : INSTALL NE!, 8n vCP BY sPot REPIACEMENT 10 ; {X VCP I,ATERAL ( CLEANOUT RECONSTRUCT]ON 11 : LAMPHOLE RECONSTRUCTION f2 ; POST CCTV SURVEY 13 : NEll I'{AN}IOLES 1{ r MAIIHOLES REPLACEMENT 15 r l4ANltoLE REHBITITATION I CHANGE OROERS: Co I : REPUCED 6" vcP VIITH 8" PEP BY PIPEBURSTING (MH 83-15 to 83-14 to B3-11 Co 2 : FoRcE ACCoUNT WORK AT 1213-1219 ECR co3: co{: : ;913,000.00 : s3, 000. 00 : 91,000.00 ! $20. 00 ; 95. 00 ; s65. 00 | $73. 00 : 9160. 00 : $100.00 9200.00 91,500.00 91.00 93,000,00 $3,000.00 $1,ooo,oo 913.000,00 s3,000.00 91,000.00 91,200,00 92,000.00 s138,710,00 s1{,?46.00 s48,160.00 96, 000, 00 $14 , 000. 00 91,500.00 92, 63?. 00 s15,000,00 s12. ooo, 0o $6, 000. 00 s278,953.00 100 100 100 100 88 100 110 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 00t 00t 00t 00s 50t 008 89r 00* 00t 00t 00i 83t 00r 00t 00t L. S. t,s. L,S. L.F L. F. L. F. L. F. L. F. EACH EACH L. F. EACH EACH BACH s0.00 s0.00 s0.00 $0.00 s0.00 s0.00 90.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 90, 00 $0.00 90,00 s13,000,00 $3.000.00 91, 000, 00 91,200.00 91,7?0.00 913 8, 710. 0 0 I 1 6, 352. 00 948,160,00 96, 000. 00 914 , 000. 00 91.500. 00 92,659 .00 915.000.00 $12,000,00 s6, 000. 00 s13,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,000,00 91,200.00 sr,770.00 9138,?10.00 916, 352. oo 948.160.00 s6.000.00 s14.000.00 $1.500.00 92,659.00 s15.000.00 s12,000.00 $6, 000. 00 $41,620,00 92, !44 ,24 941,620.00 $2 L L 1. 0. 0. 100.00t 0. 00t 0. 00t 0. 00t 941,620.00 92, L44 .24 s0.00 s0.00 9{1,620.00 92 t 144 .24 90.00 90.00 s0,00 s0.00 s0.00 s0.00 144.24 $0.00 90. 00 CHANGE ORDERS DATE SUBTOTAL PREPARED BY: Donald Chanq 72-f!-200f LESS EM (5I) PERCENT RETENTION s324, 115.24 s0. 00 s0.00 s16.205,76 $!6 ,205 ,1 6 s0.00 SUBTOTAL t.IITHOUT DEDUCT]ONS AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTR-ACTOR 9324,rr5.24 9160. 00 s323, 955 . 24 930?,909.{8 $160.00 s30?,7t 9.48 CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY CITY ENG]NEER: APPROVED BY TOTAL THIS PERIOD CONSULTANT: $160.OO TOR REIMBUPSB{ENT EOR SATURDAY C]TY OE BURLINGAME INSPECTION Si\A PUBLIC UORKS DIRECTORY1PROJECTS\9937('llPro0r6$ P.ymcnt Proj.ot No. 98$(a No. a (SHEET- PROGRESS PAYMENT.t (FINAL)) 1Zlll2@1, 3;57 PM PAGE,I OF.I 916 ,205, 75 at 1.0 ! 1,0: 60.0: 400.0: 2,!34.0. 202.0 | 301.0 r 60.0 : ?0.0 3 1.0 : 2,63',7.0 | 5.0 r 4.0 : 6.0 : 1.0: 60,0 : 354. 0 : 2,!34.0 | ZZA.V i 301.0 : 60,0 : ?0.0 ; 1.0 ; 2.659.0: 5.0 : 4,0 : 6.0 : ;*.*-.-l-{J,aql..aq*: 1 1 : 932t ,tr5.24 : (916,205.?6): t STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE I 7 02 9b TO:HONORA MAYOR AI\D COUNCIL BY DATE:December 12,2001 "y;**w ,/t,"WFRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/ Administrative Services Director 650-558-7222 r SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant - BART Shutge Resolution Authorizing Administration Agreement and Grant - CalTrain Shutge Recommendation: Approve resolutions authorizing agreements with Peninsula Corridor Joint powers Board (JPB) for administration of Burlingame shuttle buses. Background: Since September l994,the city has operated a free shuttle bus for commuters between the Broadway train station and the Rollins-Bayshore-Airport commercial and hotel areas. The shuttle has largely been funded by grants from both the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (Measure A funds) anaifre City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG.) The C/CAG funding originated from Clean Air Act grants. ln some years, the city has fully funded the shuttle with transient occupancy tax (TOT) reserye funds. This has been the case for 2000-01 and for the first six months of 200r-02. As a result of discussions between Peninsula Transportation Congestion Relief Alliance (PTCRA) staff and SamTrans/CalTrain over the past year, the city has secured 75o/o grant funding through the CalTrain JpB for the commuter shuttle, beginning January I,2002. In addition, our inquiry regardinglhe possibility of a BART to Burlingame shuttle has borne fruit, and the grant will also include 75o/o fimding of u shuttle running from BART Colma to Burlingame during commute hours. Upon completion of the Millbrae BART/CalTrain station, both shuttles will operate from that location to serve Burlingame. As a service to Burlingame residents using BART Colma, the shuttle route will include atialstop at the Burlingame Golf Center to pick up park and ride commuters. The parks and recreation directo, arrO I concur that this will not burden the parking lot, and offers a marketing opportunity to tie in a golf package with the park and ride activity. Budset Impact: The budget contains sufficient fund balances and TOT reserve appropriations to fund the 2001-02 program, but the budgets need to be corrected to reflect the grant funding. -A iransfer request will be processed after the final grant figures are sorted out. C: Michael Stevenson, Shuttle Manager, PTCRA Richard Cook, CalTrain JPB ,;! I RESOLUTION NO. 01-2002 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVTNG AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (SAMTRANS) FOR PROVISION OF SHUTTLE SERVICE BETWEEN CALTRAIN STATIONS IN THE CITY AND COMMERCIAL AREAS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, in 1994, the City of Burlingame began providing shuttle bus service to hotels, workplaces, transit points, and shopping districts; and WHEREAS, this service has been exceptionally well-received; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Transit District (SAMTRANS) has agreed to provide trp to 7 5Yo of the funding necessary to continue this service, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Agreement between the City and SAMTRANS contained in Exhibit A hereto is approved, and the City Manager is authorized. arfidirected to execute that Agreement by and on behalf of the City. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. , MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th 6u, of - January . 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, JANNEY, GALLIGAN, oIMAIioNY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NoNe ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE D RESOLUTION NO. 02-2002 RESOLUTION OT'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN MATEO COT]NTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (SAMTRANS) FOR PROVISION OF SHUTTLE SERVICE BETWEEN THE COLMA BART STATION AND THE CITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the housing shortages on the Peninsula have forced City employees to seek affordable housing at distances further and further from the City; and WHEREAS, one way of assisting current and prospective City employees in making their lives and commutes more palatable is to provide a shuttle service between the Bay Area Rapid Transit District station in Colma and the City, and to retain those employees; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County transit District (SAMTRANS) has agreed to provide uptoT5Yoof the funding necessary to continue this service, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Agreement between the City and SAMTRANS contained in Exhibit A hereto is approved, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute that Agreement by and on behalf of the City. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certif,/ that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of _ January 2002,andwas adopted thereafter by the fqllowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANN-EY, oIMAH0NY NOES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ToNT CITY J "lhv,tuto STAFF REPORT Burlingame Public Library AGENDA rrrru +-9" MEETING 'O"..,1,IO' December 12, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED BY: FROM: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian APPROVED BY: SUBJECT: Request to Attend Out of State Conference Recommendation: To approve out of state travel for four library program managers and myself to attend the Public Library Association Conference in Phoenix, Arizona, March 12'161 2002. The managers include: Barry Mills, Technology Manager; Susan Reiterman, Branch Librarianl Vera Warrick, Technical Services Managerl Linda Santo, Librarian in charge of Public Relations. Background: The biennial conference of the Public Library Association, the largest division of the American Library Association is being held in Phoenix, Arizona this spring. There are many programs that are relevant to the development of staff at the Burlingame Public Library. Two staff would like to attend a pre-conference on collection development and building branch libraries, two activities we will be very involved in the coming year. There will also be sessions on development of adult programming and community outreach activities, and technology and planning which mirror the priorities in our library's Plan of Service. Budget Impact: I am proposing a partnership to cover the costs of this important staff development. The registration cost of the conference would be borne by the Library's regular budget. The travel cost (hotel and airline) has been approved by the Library Board at their December llr200l meeting, from the Special Fund budget entrepreneurial fund (profits from the Board owned copy machines) and would not be borne by the City. Agenda ltem qa Meeting Date o2 $2,260,887.19 Ck.No. 79600 - 80087 (Excluding Library Cks.79943 - ' 79990) RECOMMENDED FOR ENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for November 200'l $1,514,891 .37 CK. No. 143155 - 144010 .EFTS for November 2001 $356,886.92 'ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding SDI (State Disability) PERS- Health Benefits Retirement S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLAN EOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS Agenda ltem 9d Meeting Date ttt toz $2,260,887.19 Ck.No. 79600 - 80087 (Excluding Library Cks.79943 -' 79990) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVED FOR PAY]VIENT a Payroll for November 2001 $1,514,891.37 CK. No. 143155 - 144010 .EFTS for November 2001 $356,886.92 -ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding SDI (State Disability) PERS- Health Benefits Retirement SlFI N EXCEL\M ISCELLAN EO US\COUNCI LCKS.XLS 12-07-?001 CITY OF BURLINGAI.|EI''ARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP - 01.02 NAME PAGE 8 At40u TFUND 101 320 326 327 526 527 528 529 618 619 620 621 625 92,310.43 157,360.06 701-16 57 ,741 .08 176,353.95 40,383.05 50.00 31 ,361 .63 't2,558.00 5,403.58 135 ,985 .61 665.80 531,70 $711 ,219.35 (la.>r WtD A-L194-t-3 1tt,Lt|.t+ TOTAL FOR APPROVAL HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUICIL: THIS IS TO I IICLUSIVE, THE At'tour,lT OFfICIALS, ACCORDANCE CERTIFY TIIAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IEERED FROM 1 TIIROT'GH 8 AI,{D/OR CLAI'.IS NUI,4BEREO TROI{ 7999'! THROI.J6H 80087 IIICLUSIVE,TOTALING IN OF 9711,?49.35, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AI.IO IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN !]ITII THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUIITS AS INDICATED TI1EREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, FII'JANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEN] COUNCI L DATE DATE GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IiiPROVEIIIENTS FUND I.'ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND SEL'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND l.IATER FUND SE!'ER FUIIO SOLID WASTE FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUI PMENT SERVI CES FUI'ID INFORMATION SERVICES FU}IO F IRE MECHAIIIC SERVICES FU}ID 80078 80079 80080 80081 80082 80083 80084 80085 80086 80087 TOTAL CI TY OF BURLINGAIIIE !/ARRANT REGISTER 12/07/01 VENDOR DETAILr*. Denotes Hand Hritten Checks PAGE 7 AMOUNT 783.33 1,200.00 228.96 51.31 40,516.89 987.55 51,000.00 76,572.00 8,353.00 '1 ,800.00 $711 ,249.35 OFF I CE DEPOT OFFICE EXPENSE JAMES P. }IARTA PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ALLIANCE GAS PRODUCTS FIRE APPARATUS i.IAI iIT. POOL PR@UCTS CO.IPANY CONTRACTUAL SERV!CES LONE STAR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AI4ERICAN CO}.|TRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EOUI PNENT SOUTH CITY FORD CAPITAL EOUIP}lENT AMERICAN TRUCK ANO TRAILER SODY CAPITAL EOUIPMENT REPUBLIC ELECTRIC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JERlCHO PROJECT PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I zED S 23153 23188 21245 23374 23375 ?3176 23377 ?3341 23382 23383 ACCOUNT 783.33 101 68010 110 1100 't,200.00 614 61520 210 228,96 101 65200 203 54,34 526 69020 220 40,516.89 320 80110 220 987.55 '101 55200 800 51,000.00 620 66700 800 76,572,00 620 66700 800 8,353.00 320 80470 220 1,800.00 101 61120 210 NUMEER IIAI.IE NUI4BER NAME 80063 80061 80065 80066 80067 80068 80069 80070 80071 80072 80073 101 68010 220 529 36711 529 68030 213 529 68030 220 PAGE 6 AMOUNT 33,811 - 63 24 ,624.00 1 ,832,66 t+Ot -91 50.00 9?,5AO.97 167.68 313.39 383.17 686.37 12,324 .19 3,121-oo 18,135.58 CITY 0F BURLINGAI,IE !/ARRANT REGISTER 12/07/01 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritteh Checks PROVIDENCE PEST TERI'II TE 21917 PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S ACCOU T 80,00 619 61460 210 5170 VB GOLF LLC COIITRACTUAL SERVICES MI SCELLANEOUS RECREATION PROGRAM EXPENSE CONTRACTIJAL SERVICES 2 4 5 22 2191a 22157 22251 22270 22324 22660 22661 22679 226A2 22899 480.00 265.50 096. 15 000.00 1584 JCC,INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S I NDUSTRIAL SAFEIY SUPPLY TRAI N I N6 EXPENSE ITlUSS0N TRAIIIING EXPENSE THERTIO GAS TECH PROTESSIOTIAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S B , ENTERPRISE CORP. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE}"IASTER SOJTH SAN FRAIICISCO FIRE APPARATUS I,IAI NT. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES ]ODO VARLAND }II SCELLANECT..IS TURF STAR EOUI PI.4Ei/T MAINT. ?4,624.00 527 66520 ?10 1,a32.66 526 69020 250 101.91 10'l 65200 260 50.00 528 66600 210 92,580.97 320 80270 220 44.50 123.18 PEIIINSULA UN I FORI.i & EAUIPI4ENT UN I TORMS AND EOUIPI.IENT 80074 LUDLOI,J & ASSOCIATES CAPI TAL EOUIPME}IT 23022 80075 MERIT RESOURCE GROUP MI SC. SUPPLIES 23076 80476 D'ARCY & HARTY COIISTRUCTIOII, IIIC 23092 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 313.39 526 22500 383.17 101 68020 200 2200 66.37 101 65200 140 12,324.19 527 66520 800 3,124.00 101 614?0 120 18,135.58 327 78532 220 AOO77 KEY RESOURCES IEMPORARY EMPLOYI1ENT SVC. ?3139 618.00 101 65300 011 618.00 80.00 101 65200 203 619 61160 220 5150 NUI48ER NAI.IE 80047 80018 80049 80050 80051 80052 80053 80054 80055 80056 80057 80058 80059 80060 80061 CI IY OF BURLINGAIIEI.IARRATIT REGISTER 12/07 /01 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hahd llritten Checkg PAGE 5 AI,IOUNT 510.00 228.36 583.20 665.80 551.77 500.00 14,590.40 290.82 553.00 1,624.77 600.00 166.59 1,878.50 4,975.87 ALL FENCE COMPAIIY, INC. BLDG. & GROUNOS I'IAI NT. CREATIVE INTERCOI,INECT CO4I.IUN I CAT I ON S CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP II.IC EOUI PI.IENT MAINT. G. N. RENN, I I'IC. SUPPLI ES Af FITIITEL COMMUNICAIIONS COI,4MUI'I I CAT IONS AT&T I,'IRELESS cot4tr1uN I cAT I0Ns PACI FIC GAS & ELECTRIC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S METALFAB INC. }1I SC. SUPPLIES MICRO IAREHOUSE CAPI TAL EOUIPI{ENT OELL MARKETING L.P. CAPI TAL EOU I PI4EI'IT RENEE RAMSEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OUICX MIX COIICRETE SIDEL'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE REDWOOD GENERAL TIRE SUPPL I ES ALFAX !'HOLESALE FURNITURE, I NC. HI SC. SUPPLIES 197',10 19768 19791 20008 20216 20301 20335 20376 20505 ?0706 20900 21136 21140 21216 21505 ACCOUNT 510.00 526 69020 190 22A.36 101 65200 160 583,20 101 55300 200 547,26 620 15000 665.80 621 64450 160 551"77 101 65200 160 500.00 320 75110 220 14,590.40 327 79470 210 290.82 527 66520 120 653.00 101 66100 800 1,624.77 101 66100 800 600.00 101 68010 220 1231 166.59 101 662',10 219 1,878.50 620 15000 4,975.87 101 680'10 120 lroo 80062 CoRPoRATE EXPRESS 0F T8E L'ESr, I 21819 OFT ICE EXPENSE 57,90 101 65200 110 57 .90 517 .26 CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI,,'ARRANT REGISTER 12/07/01 VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks 80032 EIITENTIANN.ROVI N CO. UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENI 80033 DUKE!S SALES & SERVICE, INC t.,! I SC. SUPPLIES 80035 ACCOUNT 669.60 101 65200 110 25,055.10 327 79460 120 13,000.00 '101 68010 120 1112 3,508.00 101 64420 210 1,48E.38 527 66520 120 4?4.98 619 64160 210 5180 190.51 527 66520 140 246.10 101 61120 210 370.44 101 65200 200 125.93 101 65200 20f, 932.51 555,05 '10'l 68020 130 2300 't01 68020 140 2300 17900 18082 18357 18459 14546 18633 18659 18830 18854 18990 19025 19366 PAGE 4 AMOUNT 669.60 25,055.10 1 ,187 .59 '13,000.00 3,508.00 6,607.00 512.10 25.00 1 ,488.38 424.98 190.51 246,40 370 ,44 125 .93 80036 80037 80038 80039 80010 80041 80042 80043 80044 80045 LABOR READY, INC. TEMPoRARY EllPLoYI4ENT SVC. MI SCELLANEOTJS 406.80 '135.60 5?6 69020 011 5?6 690?0 233 CAL I TORN IA SOCIETY OF DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SAN FRAI'ICISCO GIATITS MISC. SUPPLIES I.II LLS-PE}I I NSULA HEALT}I SERVICES PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S PENINSULA CONTLICT COIITRACIUAL SERVICES NATURCLEAN I'I I SC. SUPPLIES BAY ALARI.I PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ACCESS UNI FORMS & E}IBROIDERY IJNI FOR}IS A}ID EOUIPI'IENT PREFERREO ALLIANCE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S MINOLTA EUSI NESS SYSTEI.IS EOUI PI.IENT t,iAI NT. BURTONIS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 80016 CAL I FORN IA ELECTRIC CO PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19562 327.50 101 66210 210 327.50 NUI.,IBER IIATIE 6,607.00 101 64560 220 80031 SIERRA MORENO }'IERCANTILE CO, sl4ALL T00LS UNI FOR}IS AND EOUIPMENT 18806 19131 25.00 101 64250 240 80018 80019 80020 80022 80023 80025 80027 80028 80029 80030 ACTIOI'I SPORTS }I I SC. SUPPLIES CAPI IAL EOUIPME}IT 80026 DOI'BLETREEHOTEL TRAVEL & T.IEETINGS ROCKY POI NT LLC UNI FORi.IS ANO EOUI PMENT PARKI N SECURITY CONSULTANIS MISC. SUPPLIES PEII INSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS COIITRACTUAL SERVICES VALLEY OIL CO. SUPPL IES I4ETRO MOBILE CO.II.IUN I CA] I ON S RADIO }IAI NT. PR IDE PAINT BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. STAIIDARD REGISTER OFFICE EXPENSE COLORPRINT DIGITAL OFF I CE EXPENSE I'II SC. SUPPLIES CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE !/ARRANT REGISTER 12/07.t01 VENDOR DETAI L '*' Denotes Hand lritten checks PAGE 3 ELECTRO.MOT ION IIICORPORATEO PUI4P EOUI PI.IEIIT REPAIR PUI.IP EOUI P},4EIIT REPAIR PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S 457.al 601 .80 1 ,880.53 101 66?10 230 527 66520 230 619 61160 210 5160 14007 15109 15595 15711 11761 16085 16167 16247 17402 17411 17495 ACCOUNT 387.72 101 68020 140 2200 93.00 101 64420 120 3,291.60 101 65100 220 671.00 101 58010 220 1587 5,987.85 .620 15000 616.20 527 665?0 230 1 ',18.40 5,100.00 101 68010 120 t01 680'10 800 1581 1,654.17 101 64100 250 162.01 101 65200 205 22.55 tot 68020 190 2200 1,349.57 101 51250 110 101 64420 110 101 66210 120 20 20 AI{OUNT ?,940.14 387 .72 3,291 .60 674.00 5,987.85 616.?0 3,218.10 1 ,654.17 162.01 22.55 1 ,349.67 a2 08 88 16 98 211 6l 701 80031 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING I,I I SC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 17534 320 71171 I 326 79110 I 766.31 93.00 34?,90 NUI.|8ER IIAME 17497 15250 80021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80024 TELEKEY SCAOA SYSTEII{S INC. PUMP EOUIPMENT REPAIR I]UMBER NAME 80005 80006 80007 80008 80009 80010 80011 80012 80015 AUGUSI SUPPLY, INC I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 80014 CIIY OT BURLINGAI4EL/ARRA}IT REGISTER 12/07/01 B. E.I . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES iII SC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SAFETY (LEEN CORP. RENTS & LEASES ABAG - L IABI LI TY CLAII.IS PAYI.IENTS GOV I T. FINANCE OFFICERS ASS}I. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GARY . oLSON, PH.D. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S LEONA MORIARTY CONIRACTUAL SERVTCES 3 T EOUI PI,IENT CO. I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 38.61 231.92 101 66240 120 619 64460 120 5110 VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Dehotes Hand Lrritten Checks ACCOUNT 203.01 101 68020 180 2200 11,358.00 618 64520 601 09072 09168 09518 09670 09884 09902 09979 10077 10256 11020 11568 65200 120 65200 130 PAGE 2 A}'iOUNT 273.53 203.04 11 ,358.00 120.08 55.00 300.00 I ,680.00 220.11 549.91 19.20 2,1 .62 435.00 ORCIIARD SUPPLY HARDI.JARE },II SC. SUPPLIES SI.{ALL T@LS VEHICLE }IAI NT. FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI}IT, 101 '101 101 101 65200 202 65200 203 80016 DOROTHY OI GRADY }II SC. SUPPLIES SIATE BAR OT CALI FORNIA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 55.00 101 61250 240 300.00 101 64120 210 1,680,00 101 68010 220 1344 220.11 527 665?0 120 519.91 101 65200 111 19.20 101 56210 120 101 65200 1',! 0'l0l 65200 120 101 65200 2tO 101 65200 250 625 65213 203 435.00 101 61310 240 CH IEF 8I LL REILLY OFFICE EXPENSE I{ I SC. SUPPLIES OUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TRAI N I NG EXPENSE FIRE APPARATUS I'IAINT. 368.87 835.n 235.00 709.76 37 ,20 11637 80017 DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEI.IS CAPI TAL EOUlPIIE}IT 13890 1,647.51 101 6/.250 800 I ,647.51 -82.31 '101 .07 62.10 39.22 80015 I,IUMBER I.IAME 79999 8000'1 80002 80003 ACTION CLEANI},IG SERVICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES P. G. & E. GAS & ETECTRIC SAN fRAIICISCO gATER DEPT. I,IATER PURCHASES SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS I'I I SCELLANEOUS STATE CONTRO!LER I,4I SCETLANEOUS 121.22 101 68010 120 1581 320 79410 220 619 64460 220 253.09 294.50 101 65200 140 625 65213 203 CITY OT BURLINGAI,IE!/ARRANT REGISTER 12/07t01 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks 8.62 101 66210 222 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 8.62 16,999.11 517.59 1,662,27 90.36 109.99 401.26 298.96 19,912.81 171 ,683.16 1 ,418. 00 400.00 79991 GRAY I S PAINT, BURL!|GA E 01025 TRAFF I C CONTROL MATERIALS 79992 L. ir. cuRTIs & soNs UTII FORI.IS AilD EOUIPI.IENT FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT. 79995 DULIN ADVERTISIIIG IXC. PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERTISING 79994 79996 79997 L',I./, GRAI NGER, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES K & Li DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP r,r r sc. suPPt-tEs 80000 1,662.?7 101 64420 150 01030 01052 02027 02160 02248 02261 02615 03353 03536 03666 45 .76 17 .56 27 ,04 FEDERAL EXPRESS OFF I CE EXPEI/SE PROFESSIOI,JAL & SPECIAL I ZED S I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 101 64120 110 320 80190 2',t 0 527 66520 120 79998 GRAN I TE ROCK COMPANY STREET RESURFAC I NG EXPENSE 109.99 619 64460 1?0 401.26 101 66210 2?6 298,96 619 64460 120 5120 19,91?.84 10't 66240 170 171,6a3.16 5?6 690?0 171 1,418.00 526 69020 233 100.00 '101 33900 80001 tIilDSTRO|.,! CO. 14I SC. SUPPLIES 09059 58'1.65 619 64460 120 3160 581.65 421.22 ACCOUNT 15,329.76 1 ,669,37 79993 ALPINE AI,JARDS, I NC. }II SC. SUPPLIES 02036 03054 '1'l -30-2001 CI TY OF BURLINGAI.iEL'ARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP - 01-02 PAGE 7 AMOUNT 42,765.1O 153,192.11 4,512.50 16,526. 2,ffi,11 761 .13 NAiIE 871.70 614.n 't ,216.27 235.27 265 ,354.78 25.63 6,010.95 rUiID 101 320 326 526 527 529 618 620 621 625 711 746 896 GEI,IERAL TUND CAPITAL II.IPRoVEiIENTS FUIID gATER CAPITAL PROJECT IUND IJATER FU}ID SETER FUTID GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURA}ICE IUND EOUI PI{ENT SERVICES FUND I NFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND FIRE I4ECIIAIIIC SERVICES FUI,ID TRUST ANO AGE}ICY FUND BURLINGAI.IE TRAIII SHUTTLE PROGRAM UTILITY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL TOR APPROVAL $191,762.70 CERIIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROI 1 TIIROUGII 7 A}.IDIOR CLAIMS NUI4BEREO FRO4 79871 THROUGH 79942 IIICLUSIVE,TOTALING I}I OF $494,762.70, HAVE BEEII CHECKED IN DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY TIIE PROPER A}ID I}I I,IY OPINION REPRESE},IT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAIIISI THE CITY II{ !JIIH TfiEIN RESPECTIVE A}1OUilTS AS INDICATED TIIEREO}I. RESPECTFULLY SUB}IITTEO, THIS IS IO I NCLUSIVE, THE AMOUNT OFF I CIALS, ACCOROANCE FIi/AiICE DIRECTON APPROVED TOR PAYI.IENT ccullc I L DATE DATE IIOIIORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: CITY OF BURLINGAIIEI/ARRANl REGISTER 11/30/01 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Llritten checks ACCOUNT PAGE 6 AfiqrilT 1 ,882.98 52.32 I ,970.00 276.99 $494 ,762.70 NUI.IBER }IAI.IE 79939 79910 79941 n94? TOTAL SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES OFTICE EXPENSE I.i I SC. SUPPLIES I,IISCELLANEOJS EXPENSE r,l r sc. SUPPLIES OFFICE EXPENSE OFFICE EXPENSE 65300 66't00 64560 69020 66520 66700 21301 23311 23373 101 101 '101 526 527 620 '110 120 290 120 110 110 I ,526.50 93,08 38.02 8.45 25.51 31.42 UNIVERSAL SPECIALT IES, INC. I{ISCELLAilEqJS SAN I4ATEO COfiI.IUN ITY COLLEGE DIST 23372 TRAINII,IG EXPENSE HIPSTIERIS SPORTS stlALt T00Ls 52.32 101 68020 '192 2200 1,970.00 101 64420 262 276.99 101 65300 130 NUMEER I{AI'IE 79928 79930 79931 79932 79933 79935 79936 ROBERT BELL t{I SCELLANEOUS 73 00 101 65100 220 621 64450 110 101 65't00 110 101 65100 220 PAGE 5 AI,4OUNT 160.00 2,010.32 300.00 85.00 600.00 47.41 127.00 1,171.46 798.?5 9,283.80 CITY OF BURLIiIGAI{E9ARRA}IT REGTSTER 11/30/01 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hard t.itten Checks ROBERTA TAVAKE CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES N9?9 OES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PROFESSIOI{AL & SPEClAL I ZED S 22675 22676 ?2751 22924 23045 23065 23139 ?3236 ACCOUNI 160.00 t01 68010 220 1451 2,040.32 320 80200 210 300.00 526 69020 210 85.00 101 65200 205 500.00 10't 68,010 220 1347 GHIRAROELLI ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S iII LLS PEIIINSULA IIEALTII SERVICES VISUAL AIDS ROBERTA RESTANI CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES PI T}IEY BOI'ES OFT I CE EXPEI.ISE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 79934 MEEHA},I BATTERY EOUIPI'IE}IT t.IAI NT.47.41 101 68020 200 2200 1?7.00 10't 64420 031 n8.25 'tol 65300 0t1 9,283.80 320 75110 210 ?5 320 PI TNEY ECII.IES CONTRACIUAL SERVICES OFFICE EXPENSE 79937 KEY RESOURCES TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOYI,IENT SVC. 79938 ovA PARTNERS, t[C. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22672 571 ,73 22828 623,46 546.00 23128 NUI4BER NAME 79913 79914 79915 79916 79917 79918 79919 799?2 79923 799?5 SPRINT PCS co4l4uN I cAT I ON S CO.|I4UI,I I CAT I ON S UTILITY EXPENSE 101 66210 526 69020 896 202a1 PAGE 4 AMOUNT 3,000.00 2,38/.43 1,200.00 522.00 257 .42 129.04 6,922.04 15.76 720.OO 390.00 761.13 57.00 14,374,00 CIIY OF BURLINGAMELiARRAI,IT REGISTER 11/30t01 VEIIDOR DETATL.ir Denotes Hand llritten Checks LYNX TECHNOLOGIES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ACCOUNT 3,000.00 320 75170 210 21767 LAI'RENCE S. },IOY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NANCY LOCKE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COUIIIY OF SAN }IATEO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES UI,I I SOURCE NORTHERN CAL OIVISION I.IISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. I.I I SCELLANEOUS DGBA AND ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PATRI CIA I.ICI.IORROIi CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 150 160 1,200,00 101 68010 220 1462 522.00 101 68010 220 1460 257.82 101 65150 220 129.04 526 69020 290 6,922.04 101 !7010 45,76 101 65200 110 720.00 101 68010 220 1462 8,540.00 320 7A520 210 390.00 10't 64350 240 761,13 529 68030 l20 4200 57.00 '101 68010 220 1344 14,374.00 320 80170 220 20501 20721 20954 21195 ?1209 21181 21875 21997 22301 225a4 2259a 174 529 677 7 3 3 SPECIALTY TECHT,IICAL PUBLISHERS I 22153 DUES & SUBSCRIPIIONS 79927 PI TNEY BOIJES RESERVE ACCqJNT I.I I SCELLANEOUS 22624 5,000.00 101 15500 5,000.00 8,540.00 79920 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE I./EST, I 21819 OTFICE EXPENSE 79921 SA}I I.IATEO ICE CHALET COiITRACTUAL SERVICES 79926 AI4ERICAII ASPHALT CONTRACTUAT SERVICES 79921 SIERRA PACIIIC TURF SUPPLY I.I I SC. SUPPLIES NU}IBER NAME 79898 79A99 79900 79901 79902 79903 79904 79905 79906 w907 79908 79909 PENTNSULA CORRIDOR REIITS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES 320 78290 220 326 80320 220 101 66210 180 526 69020 180 527 56520 180 PAGE 3 AMOUIIT 70,629,37 197.8A 2,400.00 694.00 40,500.00 202.93 79.92 975.00 3,755.00 1'16 -92 497.57 25.63 500.00 LINHART PETERSEII POI'ERS ASSOC. 16599 Ii{I SCELLAIIEOUS SIIAI.I PIPELINE INC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CITY OF BURLINGAIIEUARRAXT REGISTER 11/30/01 VENDOR DETAIL '*' Denotes Hard llritten Checks ACC0UITT 35,941.85 731 22515 &,116,87 4 ,512,50 STEIIART AIID STEVENSO}I FIRE APPARATUS IiIAI}.IT. RALF SINGER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LABOR READY, INC. TEI.IPORARY EI4PLOYIIENT SVC. JJR CO}ISTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S BLACK qJ TAIN SPRING !'ATER IiI I SC. SUPPLIES BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC OFFICE EXPEIISE STEVE SILVER PRODUCTIONS INC I,{ I SC. SUPPLIES JOINT 17959 17983 14476 159 18979 19330 19588 19675 20060 20105 20301 20335 197.44 525 65213 203 2,400.00 101 68010 220 1460 694.00 526 69020 011 40,500.00 320 79380 210 202.93 527 66520 120 n,9? 101 65200't10 975.00 101 68010 't20 1321 251 -& 25't .67 251 .67 EL CAIiI I}IO CIIARTER LI ES INC I.IISC. SUPPLIES GE CAPITAL OFFICE EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 416.92 101 68010 120 1323 101 58020 110 2100 101 68010 220 1100 79910 AT&T 9IRELESS cofitluN I cAT I O[ S 79911 PACI F IC GAS & ELECTRIC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.63 736 61571 160 500.00 520 80510 220 79912 OAPPER TIRE CO., INC. STJPPLIES 20164 249.Q 620 15000 289.12 35,941.85 99-51 398.06 ?0216 VE}IDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hand Uritten Checks 2,117.9 2,224.19 512.10 97,99 648,A2 139,94 167,00 127,00 130.7f 1 ,434.00 425.00 742-49 198.17 606.91 PAGE 2 A}IOUNT 871,70 271 .63 184.80 37.39 9,112.40 664 -27 401.00 2,376.00 12,366.57 533.60 79887 ABAG . LIABILITY CLAI}.IS PAYMENTS SEOUOIA U}I IOII HIGII SCHOOL OFFICE EXPETISE INTERSTATE TRAFFIC MISC. SUPPLIES CIIIET GARY 11. t,IISSEL OFF I CE EXPE}ISE I.{ I SC. SUPPLIES UNI FORI.IS AI,IO EOUIPMENT cottMuli I cATrolrs EOUIP}.IENT HAINT. GAS, OIL & GREASE PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S DUES & SUBSCRIPTIOIIS TRAVEL & I'IEETI}IGS TRAINII.IG EXPENSE PRISONER EXPEI.ISE POLICE INVESTIG.ATION EXPENSE t,I I SC. SUPPL IES I.I I SCELLANEOIIS NUI.IBER IIAI.IE 79B88 79889 79a91 79a93 791 79895 79896 09518 09720 09790 11571 13720 13758 13890 14007 11114 15196 101 101 101 t0l 101 t0t 101 101 101 101 101 10'l 320 73! 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 55100 65100 65100 65100 55100nao 22574 110 120 140 160 200 201 210 240 250 260 ?91 292 120 ACCOUNT 874.70 518 64520 601 271.53 101 65100 110 184.80 101 66210 t20 37.39 625 65213 203 79892 DANKA OFFICE II'IAGING CO CITY HALL IIAIN]ENANCE 668.27 621 &450 200 401.00 101 54250 200 DOCUMEIIT PROCESSIIIG SYSTEMS EAUI PI.iEIIT t.IAINT. ELECTRO-}IOT I OII INCORPORATEO PUI{P EAUIPMEIIT REPAI R PUXP EAUI PIiIE}IT REPAI R INVENSYS }IETERING SYSTEMS CAPITAL EOUIPiIENT EVERGREEN CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES 1,18t].00 1, t88.00 526 59020 230 527 65520 230 12t366.57 526 69020 803 533.60 lot 680'10 220 1160 79897 SYDNEY I{ALK@ SI.IALL T@LS 16317 226,53 620 66700 130 226.53 79890 IHE ADAI.I. HI LL COI.IPAIIY FIRE APPARATUS iIAINT. CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER 11/30/O1 79871 * NATIONAL UNION TIRE INSURANCE CO 23571 I.I I SCELLANEOUS CITY Of BURLINGAI,4ES'ARRAIIT REGISTER 11/30/01 VENDOR D€TAILr*r Denotes HEnd gritten Checks NUI.4BER NAi{E 79872 L. ll. cuRTrs & soNs FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT 79873 GENE EVANS CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 79871 EL/I}IG IRRIGATION PROOUCTS }IISCELLANEOUS 79876 IJ.It'. GRAINGER, INC. I{ISC. SUPPL!ES 79877 79878 79880 79881 79882 79aa4 79885 ACCOUNT 120,000.00 731 22535 65.35 101 65200 203 560.00 101 6A010 220 1112 846.91 101 6t,020 192 2200 1t333,82 A96 20282 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 120,000.00 65.35 360.00 u6.91 4,333,82 386.08 554,07 217 -OA 5.n '108,809.99 61.67 342 -50 783 - 00 333.00 217,08 101 66210 200 5.75 620't5000 61.67 620 15000 382.50 101 58010 220 1344 783.00 101 68010 220 1590 333.00 101 68010 220 1347 8.639.25 320 40232 220 GRANITE ROCK COI4PANY S!DEL/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFAC I NG EXPEIJSE NATIONI.IIOE }JIRE & BRUSH I4FG. EOIJTPIIE}IT MA I NT. SAI,I I.IATEO COUNTY COIIVENTIOII & I.I T SCE L LAII ECTIS SERRAMONTE FORD INC. SUPPLIES JEA}I BUCKS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES !,ALTER GREIIN COIITRACTUAL SERVICES TESTING EIIG I NEERS, INC. CONTRACIUAL SERVICES 272,16 zal .91 10'l 66210 219 101 66210 226 02149 02157 021a1 02214 0?261 03002 03205 03431 03523 09019 09125 09147 09270 79886 OCE I.BRUNING, I}IC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 09193 855.37 101 66100 210 855.37 a,$9.25 02027 79875 L/ATER,/F I NANCE PETTY CASII MI SCELLANEOUS 79879 PUTNAI'I BUICK PONTIAC GI.IC SUPPLIES 386.08 101 66240 120 108,809,99 731 22587 79883 I'lUFFIE CALBREATH CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11-21-2001 CTTY OF EURLINGAME T'ARRANT REGI STER tuID RECAP - 0l -02 PAGE 11 AI'IOUNT 110,598.39 971,00 96,560.44 3,200,00 6,174,22 170,277.07 498,91 9,320,39 067.38 249.18 ,401 .93 t5r7 ,917 .29 .rqs3I '119t - NAI4E TOTAL FOR APPROVAL FUND 101 130 320 326 526 527 528 529 618 619 620 621 731 736 896 7 2 5 20,910.38 7t,165.57 8,760.00 42,758.39 (-ts.oo) uc ?s.oo> 0!- 551t1u1 .a1 HONORABLE I{AYOR AIID CITY CqJNCIL: CER]IFY THAT THE CLAIUS LISTED ON PAGES NU}IEERED FROI.I 1 TIIRCI'GH 11 AID/OR CLAII|S ItUitBERED FRor,t ?9736 TIRCUGH 79870 IilCLUSIVE,ToTALI]IG tN OF S5'7,917.29, HAVE BEE}I CHECXED IN DETATL A}ID APPROVED BY TIIE PROPER AND tX I{Y OPI}IIOII REPRESENT fAIR AiIO JUST CIIARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN UITH IIIEIR RESPECTTVE ATqJ TS AS INDICATED THEREOII. vo t9 VOI D THI S IS TO tllcLUslvE, THE A!,IOI,IIT O'FICIALS, ACCORDANCE RESPECTIULLY SUBI.IITTED, FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVEO FOR PAYI{ENT DATE cou ct L DATE CEIIERAL FUND PAYPOLL REVOLVING FUND CAPITAL I},IPROVEI.iENTS FUND !/ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND i.JATER FI'ND SE!'ER TUND SOLTD IIASTE FU}ID GOLF CENTER TU}ID SELT I NSURA}.ICE IUIID FACI LI TIES SERVICES FUND EAUTPI.IEIIT SERVICES FU}ID INFORI.'AT IOII SERVICES FUND 'RUST ANO AGE}ICY FTJND BURLINGAXE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM UTILITY REVOLVING FUND CITY OF BURLIXGAI.IE TIARRANT REGISTER 11/21t01 PAGE 10 AI.IOIJNT 505.09 625.79 295.92 1,125,00 163 -50 109.00 190 - /,5 s557 ,917 ,29 NUI,IBER NAI4E 79464 79865 79866 797 TOTAL JOLEEN EUTLER TRAINING EXPENSE PARADISO MECHANTCAL DEPOSTT RETUIIDS SAN IRANCTSCO IXAI{INER }I I SC. SUPPLIES THE PRACTICAL SOLU?IOIIS GRqJP }II SCELLANEOI,IS NW ANCHOR DETATLI}IG vEfltcLE ltAtllT. NU9 AICO ITTERNATIO}IAL STREET RESURIACING EXPE}ISE 79870 AI.ISTERDAII PRIIITII,IG AIID LITHO OFFICE EXPENSE 23364 23365 23366 23367 ?3368 23369 23370 ACCOUNT 505.09 101 65500 260 625.79 526 22501 295.92 101 64400 i20 4,125.00 618 64520 038 163,50 101 65200 202 VENDOR DETAIL '*' oenotes Hand lhitten Checks 109.00 101 66210 226 190.45 101 64200 tt0 CITY OT EURLIIIGAI.IETJARRANT REGISTER 11/21t01 VENDOR DEIAILr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks PAGE 9 AMOUI,IT 20,506.90 10. l8 418,03 735,55 5,482,00 177 -OO 23,550.00 2,592.00 77.25 18. 16 300.00 167.81 75.00 I,IUMBER NAI.IE 79848 79849 79850 79451 79452 753 79454 79855 79456 79858 n859 n861 n862 PATRICIA ERATT DEPOSIT REFUNDS lIILLIAI.I HUEI DEPOSIT RETUIIDS EANK OF A!1ER I CA I.I I SCELLANEOUS ROO GARCIA t.I I SCELLANEOUS NOVA PARTNERS, I NC. PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S DIRECTV iI I SC. SUPPLIES K&L AU]CX.IOT I VE SERVICE EOUIPI.IEIIT I.IAI NT, RCSt COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES VEI,ITEK I}ITERNATIOIIAL COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES FRED CROIJE I,IISCELLANEOUS N8'7 }IASANAO SHIIIADA I.IISCELLAIEq,S BotsE cAscADE offlcE pRoDucTs c0 23306 OFF ICE EXPENSE ur,r I VERSAL SPECIALTIES, lNC. I'l I SCEL LAr,rEorrS ACCOUNT 20,506,90 520 75110 2r0 10.18 526 69020 120 418,03 101 64250 ll0 735,55 101 68020 192 2200 3,482.00 620 66700 200 ln.oo 101 &420 240 23,550.00 101 66210 220 2,592.00 320 AO17O 22O n.25 '26 22500 18.16 526 22500 300.00 731 22520 300-00 731 22520 1t0.00 731 22520 ft7.U 526 22500 75.00 731 225A1 23338 E!{PLOYER RESCI.,IRCE TNSTITUTE, INC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 23353 23236 ?3253 25511 23354 ?3355 23357 23354 23360 23361 23362 79863 }IARIBETH FARCICII LIERARY EXPEIISES 23363 100.00 731 22531 100.00 300.00 150.00 23359 79860 LARRATT BROS PLUI.IBING DEPOSIT RETUIIDS 23356 CITY OF BURL I NGA!,iE L/ARRANT REGISTER 't1t21t01 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hsnd tlritten Checks PAGE 8 1,260.00 8,760.00 16.28 100.00 520,00 6n .50 75,00 120.00 25,000.00 47.41 506.92 2,737 .OO 158.00 618.00 1,250.00 NUI,IEER NAME 79832 79a33 79431 79834 79839 79810 nu1 79442 79844 79845 79816 22621 79835 COLLEEN JOiIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22673 79836 sAN |{ATEo REGIoNAL }IETIJoRK, tNC, 22759 U'ILITY EXPENSE 79837 TE}IIIANT SUPPLIES i{DL PLASTIC BACS COI.IPAIIY }IISC. SUPPLIES A}IY GETTLE LIBRARY EXPENSES DAiLEIIE ROSE DEI,IARIA CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES I.IARSTEN STREET PARTNERS I.IISC. SUPPLIES I.IEEIIAI,I BATTERY EoulPlrEIT [AtNr. I.I I CHAEL STERN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES KEY RESOURCES TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOY}IEXT SVC. 1,260.00 101 68010 220 t585 8,760.00 736 &r70 220 16.28 620 15000 100.00 101 58010 220 1589 520.00 896 20241 5n.50 101 68020 120 2200 75.00 731 22531 25,000,00 320 76010 120 47.41 101 68020 200 2200 506.92 101 &420 250 2,737.00 101 61420 120 164-00 101 68010 220 1584 518,00 101 65300 011 1,250.00 101 64250 z',t0 NORTH A}IERICAN SPORTS I.IANAGEI4ENT 22582 CO}ITRACTUAL SERVTCES PARKING CO.IPAiIY OF AI,iER I CA COilTRACTUAL SERVTCES ROBERT BELL TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS NU3 iIERI T RESqJRCE GTOTJP illsc, suPPLtEs 22500 22814 228r'.0 22495 23045 23065 23076 23097 23139 23178MAZE & ASSOCIATES PROTESSIOiIAL & SPECIALIZEO S 798/7 I.IANAGEI.IEI{T PARTNERS PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 23r80 300 , 00 101 &150 2'10 300.00 22807 ACCoUIT 120,00 101 68010 220 1461 AMOUI.IT 79419 79420 721 79822 79823 79821 727 79829 79830 DU-ALL SAFETY TRAINI}IG EXPEI,ISE TRAIiII}IG EXPENSE TRAINTNG EXPENSE 21613 INC.21631 21585 21713 21723 21948 21981 21997 22194 PAGE 7 4,670.00 1,086.30 320.00 380.00 120 - 00 440.47 33,077.00 4,914.29 2,375.40 2,389.64 11.71 CITY OF BURLII,IGA}IEIJARRANT REGISTER,t1/21/01 VENDOR DETAILt*' oenotes Hand Hritten Checks ACCOUN] 00 00 00 101 66210 260 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 ARAI.IARK UN I FORI.I UIII FORiIS A}ID UNI FORIIS AND UN I FORI.IS AND UII I FORI{S AND UN I TON S ANO t01 526 527 619 620 &210 69020 (6520 64460 66700 868 401 401 SERVICES, EOUI PI.{ENI EQt', I PI.IENT EOUI PI,IENT EOUI PI,IEiIT EOUI P}IEIIT 325.24 197,20 285,88 213. 63-',tz 140 140 140 140 140 21747 n825 EtBB AND ASSoCIATES, tNC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S CIIIGULAR I'IRELESS co,lr{,rN I cAT t 0|l s 79826 VB GOLF LLC I.IISCELLANEOUS RECREATIOI'I PROGRAiI EXPENSE TRACY SI RI COIITRACTUAL SERVICES LISA COFFARO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CNRISSY HOLI.IES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AT&T UTILITY EXPEIISE CUI.|I,IINS.ALLISOil CORPORATION CAPITAL EOUIPI.IEIT 520.00 101 68010 220 1345 !80.00 101 68010 2?0 1546 120.00 101 68010 220 1342 140,87 101 66100 160 33,02,00 320 7A290 210 7 ,425,'t9 1,489.10 529 36716 529 ffi30 213 2,375.40 101 64420 210 10'l 66100 210 320 n390 210 1't,71 496 20281 3,582.05 101 64250 800 IEDA PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S 79828 DGBA AIID ASSOCTATES PROTESSIONAL & SPECTALIZED S PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S 79831 J. J.R. CoNSTRUCTIOX I.I I SCELLANECT,S 22212 55,710.00 731 22560 55,710,00 IIUiIBER NAI,IE AI4OUNT 3,582.05 21863 221!8 142,05 2,247 .59 CITY OF BURLINGAIEUARRAIIT REGISTER 11t21t01 VE},IDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tlEnd l.itten Checks PAGE 6 AI.IOIJNT 2,522.18 177,20 2,508, oo 249.40 556 -72 125.00 309.95 7,660,01 1 ,51',t .68 61 .56 1,500.00 1 ,'198.88 79804 79805 706 79807 79809 79810 79811 79812 n813 79815 n816 RACOUET S}IITH CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79808 ARLETTE PETERSON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DAVID T. O'KEEIE }IISCELLANEOUS UTILITY AERIAL I}IC EOUIPI.IENT }IAI}IT. AFFINITEL COI4I.IUN I CATIONS CO}IMUNICATIONS COUNTY OF SAN i|ATEO ISC. SUpPL IES DOROTHY L. LAI RD COITTRACTUAL SERVICES IIICRO UAREHOT,SE CAPITAL EOUI PI.IEN] ESA EIIVIRON}IE}ITAL SCI EXCE ASSOC DEPOSIT REFUND SHIRLEY HE t }IA}I COI,IIRACTUAL SERVICES REDIJOOO GARDE}/ I.IATERIAL ISC. SUPPLIES TIIE BAiIK OF I{EI,I YORK CITY HALL }IAIIITENANCE ACCOUNT 8,075.00 731 22560 2,522.4A 101 68020 200 2300 177.20 621 64t 50 160 2,508.00 101 68010 220 1582 249.40 101 6a010 220 1347 556.72 101 68010',t20 1320 125,00 101 68010 220 1589 309,95 527 66520 AOO 7,660,01 731 22590 354.72 101 68010 220 1231 1,51r.68 620 15000 61,56 101 58020 120 2300 1,500.00 1o't 64450 220 1,198.88 101 68010 220 1547 '19905 19990 20216 20339 20547 20548 20&2 ?0706 21160 21216 21217 21439 2148179814 UNISOI,,RCE NORTHERII CAL DIVISIO}I IIISCELLAI{EO'S EXPENSE 216,60 sZ6 69020 290 246,60 NU}I8ER NAI.IE 21204 8,075.00 354.72 7 14 REDIIO@ GENERAL TIRE SUPPLIES 79817 FRISCO DEL ROSARIO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 21442 CITY OF EURLINGAXE9ARRANT REGISTER '11t21/01 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks PAGE 5 NUI.IBER NAI{E 79788 79789 79790 79791 79793 79794 79795 79796 79798 79799 79800 79801 79802 LIIIDA HOECK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HAROLD FIELDS COXTRACTUAL SERVICES irIKE Sr.r I Til CO},ITRACTUAL SERVI CES LASoN I r,lc. I.I I SCE L LATI ECIJS TOOLS EXPRESS S}IALL T@LS GEORGE I.IASTALIR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I{ICHAEL ADAiI COIITRACTUAL SERVICES LY}I},IE F IRESTONE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LAIIDFI LL SYSTEI.IS EIIGIIIEERING PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S IIATURCLEA}I I.I I SC. SUPPLIES ANG iIEI'SPAPERS utsc. SUPPLIES LTESERT CASSIDY I,IH I TI{ORE PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S PRIORITY 1 SUPPLIES JOHN CAHALAII, ASLA PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 15390 16637 17158 17661 18027 18088 1A275 1a746 18754 18830 19083 19095 19239 19561 ACCOUNT 2,060.00 101 68010 22O 1346 280.00 101 68010 220 1588 300.00 101 68010 220 1589 520,16 731 22518 168.00 101 68010 220 1588 517.11 t01 68020 t30 2200 275.00 101 58010 220 1589 252.00 101 68010 220 1588 960.00 101 68010 220 l25t 498.91 524 ffiOO 210 1,984.50 527 &520 120 90.50 101 64350 210 1,062.50 320 80140 210 AI.IOIJNT 2,060.00 280.00 300.00 520.56 168.00 517,11 275.00 252.0O 950.00 1 ,9a1.50 21 .60 90.50 50.36 1 ,052.50 79803 CIUCCI CONSULT I IIG GRC[,,P INC COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 19791 90-00 101 55300 220 90.00 21.60 101 54400 120 50.36 620 15000 498.91 79792 DENISE A. itCCoY COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ftBa CITY OF BURLINGAI'IEIIARRANT REGISTER 11/21t01 VENOOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lrritten checks IIU}IBER NA}IE 79m 79776 797n nn8 797n 79780 79781 79782 n783 79781 79745 10557 11561 tt6t0 11749 13613 13910 14021 14405 1/.855 15629 15815 101 101 101 526 527 527 619 620 &210 6E020 662'10 69020 66120 66520 61160 66700 120 192 222 120 120 '130 120 120 2?00 43-58 81.78 122.55 242.05 16.20 61 .42 450.47 11,37 ACCOUNT AI.iOIJNT 1 ,029.a2 971.00 '140,00 470.25 10.79 1,651.91 157.23 175,16 720.00 319,38 224.00 821.10 EI.IPLOYI.IENT OEVELOPI,IENT DEPARTI.IEN 10567 ISCELLAl,tEOt S LEE SIA'iBOL I S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 971,00 150 21020 '140.00 101 68010 220 1588 170.25 101 68010 220 1344 10.n 101 66210 160 157.23 896 20281 175.16 619 64460 220 5170 720.00 101 6A010 220 1462 UILI.IA BURGESS COIITRACTUAL SERVICES RADIO SHACK co,04uil I cAT I oN s ARC ELECTRIC BLDG. & GROJNDS I.IAINI. AT&T UTILITY EXPENSE GERBOTH FIRE EXTI}IGUISHER CO. COiITRACTUAL SERVICES I.IARK CERI.IY CONTRACIUAL SERVICES ROYAL I,IHOLESALE ELECTRIC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I.i I SC. SUPPLIES 100 ?44 T II.I OLENO COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES 79786 BRTNK.S tNC. BANKING SERVICE TEES OFFICE EXPE}ISE 221.00 101 68010 220 1588 98 40 t20 80150 220 619 64460 120 415.00 406. t 0 101 64250 120 529 68050 0 4200 79787 TIOSS RUBBER & EOU I PI.IEIIT CORP. TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE 16225 60 .37 10't 66210 260 .l 1,651.91 101 68010 190 1585 CAL-S]EA}I I{ I SC. SUPPLIES I.iISCELLANEC[,lS TRAFFIC CONTROL I.IATERIALS I.i I SC. SUPPLIES I.I T SC, SUPPLIES SiIALL T@LS I.i I SC. SUPPLIES l.l I sc. suPPLtEs PAGE 4 60.37 CITY OF BURLI}IGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER 11t21t01 VET/DOR DETAI L.*' oenotes Hand Uaitten Checks 120 2200 130 120 120 130 '!20 '130 PAGE 3 AUOUNT 244.76 10,948.31 2,942.38 800- 00 1,411.59 349. 18 1 ,980. 18 160.00 225.00 NUI.IBER NAI.IE n765 n766 79767 79769 79770 79771 EERNARD EOI'ARDS COIITRACIUAL SERVICES SEOUOIA U}IION HIGH SCH@L OFTICE EXPEiISE CITY HALL I.IAIiITEIIANCE gESI GROUP PAYiIE}IT CTR. 03954 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S HoRIZOtl MISCELLANEOUS ACCOTJNT 244.76 10',t 54350 2r0 54.12 101 68,020 192 2200 10,948.31 320 71170 210 2,942.38 61A &520 601 800.00 101 68,010 220 1462 CALLAIIDER ASSOCIATES PROFESSIOiIAL & SPECIALIZED S 79764 ABAG - LIABILITY CLAIIIS PAYiIEXTS 09',t30 09461 09548 09670 09720 09790 1010 t 534.72 I11.1I 155.n 296,17 63.16 243,54 37,10 '10'l 101 320 526 326 619 619 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDI,'ARE MISC. SUPPLIES SI'IALL IOOLS rSC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPL I ES SI.IALL TOOLS I,I t SC. SUPPLIES SI,IALL T@LS 68020 66210 78r'90 69020 69020 64460 6t 150 309,18 40.00 621 64450 110 621 64450 200 79772 nZR AIIA F ITZGERALD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79n4 DAiYL 0. JoltES, IttC. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES INTERSTATE TRAFFIC }IISC. SUPPLIES TRAFFIC CO}IIROL I.IATERIALS TRAINING EXPE}ISE ISC, SUPPLTES 101 66210 120 101 66210 222 101 66210 260 526 69020 120 112.86 1,503,56 273.24 90.72 '150.00 101 68010 220 1342 225.00 101 65200 220 09518 09975 54.42 CITY OT BURLTNGAI{ElIARRANT REGIS]ER 11/21/O1 VENDOR DETAIL '*t oenotes Hand gritten Checks PAGE 2 AI.,IOJNT 60.16 250.00 165,130.00 524.00 259.53 54.00 507.69 5,200.00 42,069.45 150.00 168,00 3 ,353.25 150.00 6,000.00 2,650,00 L. !t. cuRrts & soils FIRE APPARATUS UAI }IT. DULI}I ADVERTTSIIIG INC. PUBLICATIONS & ADVERT IStiIO US FILTER OPERAT ING SERVICES COIITRACTIJAL SERV!CES GE}IE EVANS COIITRACTUAL SERVICES HASELBACH SURVEYII,IG I}ISTRUI.IENT TRAtNIiIG EXPENSE K & Li OISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP MISC. SUPPLIES KAVANAGH E}IGI NEERIIIG CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES 79757 P. G. & E. UTILITY EXPENSE NUI.{BER tIAI.iE 79749 79750 79751 79752 79751 79?55 79756 79758 79760 n761 79762 79763 02027 02036 02110 02149 02248 02645 02665 03054 05168 03172 05175 03234 03366 ACCOUNT 60.16 10t 55200 203 230.00 10't 64420 150 156,150.00 527 66530 2?O 324.00 101 68010 220 1312 115.67 143.96 101 68020 120 619 64460 130 2200 STEPIiEN J. PICCH I COIITRACIUAL SERVICES 79759 DOI,I PLAGI.{ANN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 03536 54.00 527 66520 260 507,69 619 6l,460 1ZO 3,200.00 326 79440 220 12,069,45 89'6 20280 168.00 101 68010 220 1588 1 50 . 00 621 &450 200 6,000.00 101 65200 220 2,650.00 526 69020 233 SANORA POEE CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES R&SERECTIOIIOF CITY HALL I.IAINTENANCE CITY OF SAII I.IATEO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SEAUOIA A}IALYTICAL LABS ISCELLAXEqJS 797& TIIEERLIIIE TREE SERVICE, I C. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 03760 15,20t.98 79753 U.I,'. GRAINGER, INC. IISC. SUPPL tES SIIALL TOOLS 02410 150.00 101 68010 220 1580 3,353.25 101 58010 220 1340 15,205.98 tol 68020 220 2300 CI]Y OF BURL INGAI.IEL'ARRAXT REGISTER 11t21tO1 VEIIDOR DETAITr*r Denote6 Hand Hritteh Checks PAGE 1 AI'IOUNT 11,336.74 395.25 200.00 2,517.70 ?,677,91 869.41 66.79 305.64 430.00 1 ,691,65 267.12 NU}I8ER NAIIE nB6 79737 79738 79740 79741 n742 79743 BAKER & TAYLOR COi.IPAI,IY LIBRARY..B@KS AND XAPS BARRY I.IILLS STAIF & I.IEETINGS JoAll [Axt N I LISRIRY EXPENSES SAiI }IATEO CREDIT UNIO}I L I BRARY..TECORDS A}ID CASSETT LtERARY--800rS AID ilAPS DAHA},IUKAR BRANDES ARCHITECTS PROFESSIOIAL & SPECIALIZED S CII,IGULAR UIRELESS coltltuil I cAT toils 0t 190 18683 19220 20303 2106r 21254 21747 01027 0'1052 01078 01663 01857 101 101 10'l 101 101 ,26 526 527 65100 66210 55200 55200 55100 69020 69020 65520 110 120 130 203 703 120 130 130 ACCOUNT 11,336.74 101 67500 ',t29 395.25 101 67500 252 200.00 731 ?2531 2,517.70 101 67500 7O2 240 136 101 67500 125 101 67500 r?9 92 99 2 %9.41 320 80370 210 56.79 101 67500 160 ACE HARDI'ARE OFTICE EXPEI|SE }IISC. SUPPLIES SI,IALL TOOLS FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI IIT. }IISCELLANECI,S }IISC. SUPPLIES S}IALL T@LS S}IALL TOOLS 22.77 131.88 19.93 56.52 3.87 60.98 31 .15 32.72 79744 ALPINE A}'ARDS, INC.i sc. suPPLtEs 79745 79716 79747 A}I]ECH ELEVATOR SERVICES EOUTPI.IEI{T I{A I NT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 201.00 229.00 101 65400 200 619 64460 2ZO 51'10 BURL I NGA}|E RECREATION DEPT. RECREAI!OII EXPENSES 305.& 101 68010 120 1581 1,691.65 101 10700 267.12 620 15000 GCS }'ESTERN Pot'ER & SUPPLIES 79714 CITY OF REDII@O CITY colfl{uN I cAT t0[s CTTY HALL I.IAINTENAIICE 400.00 19,834.00 621 64450 160 621 64450 220 20,214.OO 359.82 NBg CE I TROII I CS }I I SCE L LA},I EdJS 0186? t 1- t6-2001 CITY OF BURLIIIGAIIEUARRA}IT REGI STER FUiID RECAP . 01-02 PAGE 1I AI,4OUNT 96, 1.92 199,410. 97 ,636.U 24,696, 15,934.99 9,437.35 22,741,20 9,193.37 3,2&,37 422.97 133.56 9,429,9 8,2n.21 $497,835,65 t1t.o <>) c.,. bq.z}> c,1?Aav) 4* 1 tlZo.ot- GEiIERAL IUNO CAPITAL II.IPROVEI,IENTS FU}ID SEI.'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUNO I,ATER FUND SEI'ER FU}ID GOLF CE}ITER FUND SELT INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES TU}ID EOUIP}IEIIT SERVICES FU}ID INFOR}IATIOII SERVICES FUIID FIRE }IECHAIIIC SERVICES FU}ID TRUST AND AGEI{CY FU}ID UIILITY REVOLVIIIG fU}ID NAI,4E TOTAL FOR APPROVAL FUND 't01 320 327 526 527 529 618 619 620 621 625 731 896 '14185 1q3s3'lqu*t VOI D VO. D Vo ID THIS IS TO TIICLUSIVE, TIIE AiI(UNT OITICIALS, ACCORDANCE HOIIORABLE I{AYOR AND CITY C(UNCIL: CERTIFY THAT THE CLAI}IS LISTEO O}I PAGES iII,}IBERED fRO!.{ 1 THROUGII 11 4il0/0R cLAIlts IUIBERED FRor,r 79600 THRorrcH 79735 TNCLUSTVE,TOTALIIG tN 0F $497,835.65, I|AVE BEEX CHECKED Iil DETAIL AID APPRoVED By ]HE pROpER AND III IiIY ()PIIIIOII REPRESE}IT FAIR AIID JUST CIIARGES AGATNST THE CITY INgITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS I}IDICATED IHEREOiI. RESPECTFULLY SUSI{tTTED, TIIIANCE OIRECIOR APPROVED FOR PAY}IENT DATE DATECOIJNC I L CITY OT BURLINGA}IEUARRAIIT REGI STER 11/',t6t01 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks lZ,ZZ 92.49 620 15000 620 66700 150 PAGE 10 AMOUI,IT 195.15 104.71 288.58 690.05 693.00 r,000.00 300 -00 160.00 149.362.00 815.50 177.00 $497,435.65 KAR PR@UC]S SUPPLIES silALL r@LS 79727 BAY REPROGRAPHICS }IISC. SUPPLIES GREG iIILANO IRAINIIIG EXPEI{SE SIX CqJNTIES FIRE PROTECT ION PROFESSIO}TAL & SPECIALTZED S NUiIEER NAI.IE n725 79726 79724 79729 nai 79731 79732 79733 79734 TOTAL ACCOUNT 495.45 101 65500 260 EiI(A LEIJITT TRAINING EXPENSE ELLIOTT I IVEST}IEN] GROUP DEPOSIT REFUNDS i ilt slEN DEPOSIT REFUIIDS I,I I I,IA DEES COTITRACTUAL SERVICES AT&T BROADBA}ID CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23343 23315 23316 23348 23349 23550 23352 23353 288.58 101 64400 120 590.05 101 65500 260 693,00 6',19 61160 210 51AO 1,000.00 731 22520 300.00 731 22520 160.00 101 68010 220 1452 't19,362.00 320 80250 220 815.50 520 75110 120 177.00 101 64420 ?40 FLA@irE. C0 I,II SC. SUPPLIES 79735 ETIPLOYER RESOURCE I}ISTITUTE,INC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 23347 23344 23351 CITY OF BURLIXGAXE L'ARRANT REGISTER 11116101 VEIIDOR DETAILr*. Denotes Hand Uritten checks PAGE 9 AMOUNT 638.00 400.00 824.00 2,0n.14 3,300.00 15 ,922.60 690.00 690.00 241.12 88-28 99.95 185.85 2,115.00 702.90 500.00 SEA}I KEI GHRAN DEPOSIT REFUIIDS 79714 CYBERNEI COIISULTING, I}IC. PROfESSIO'IAL & SPECIALIZED S }IERIT RESdJRCE GROIJP I.I I SC, SUPPLIES T, RANDOLPH GRAI{GE I.IISCELLAXECUS KEY RESOURCES TEI.IPORARY E}IPLOYI{ENT SVC. JO ANN C@PER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JOII}I XIELY TRAINING EXPEIISE CHARLES SIERRA TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE I.ICKESSON GENERAL I.IED I CAL SUPPLIES ltoiTRAx SUPPLIES 79719 A.8. S. EOUI PI.IETT I.iAINT. ACCoUNT 638.00 101 64420 120 400.00 7i1 22525 824,00 101 55500 011 2,077.14 101 64250 220 3,500,00 731 22520 15,922.60 320 79400 210 590-00 101 65100 260 690.00 101 65100 260 88.28 620 15000 99.95 101 65300 200 185,85 526 69020 210 2,115.00 618 64520 038 702.90 101 65500 260 500.00 731 22525 IIUI.IBER NAI4E 79709 79710 79711 79712 n713 79715 79716 79717 n718 79720 79723 FORD SIBLEY IIISCELLANE(n,S I.IETROTECH PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALTZED S 79721 SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATIO 23339 I.I I SCELLAIEqJS 23076 23112 23139 23204 23232 23234 23249 23250 23275 ?3335 23335 23337 23310 23341 79722 XARCO CAVALIERI IRATXI}16 EXPENSE 79724 r. co ilI FFE IISCELLA]lEqJS 23342 50- 00 Ti1 22525 241.12 101 65200 112 50.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME UARRAIIT REGt STER 't'v16t01 VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks 50 00 529 36717 529 68030 213 PAGE 8 AMOUNT 2,348.50 8,243.50 841.49 310.36 500,00 392.25 5,150.00 172.53 18,840.00 280.00 8,954.00 /+85 .80 920.85 XUI.IBER NAI.IE 79591 79695 79696 79698 79699 79700 79701 79702 79703 79704 79705 79706 79707 ACCOUilT 2,348.50 619 64460 220 5190 A&LJANITORIALSERVICE COIITRACTUAL SERVTCES VB GOLF LLC IiISCELLAilEO,S RECREAIIOI PROGRTII EXPEIISE VERIZON t,'IRELESS COiII.IUN I CAT IONS GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S ABSOLUTE CELLULAR cct{r{ul I cAt Iolls JEIIKINS/ATHENS INS CLAII{S ADJUSTING SERVTCES PENINSULA UIII FOR}I & EOUIPI{ENT UN I TORI.IS AND EOUIPilENT AI{ERI CAN TURF SERVICES I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 21936 ?1948 22006 22089 22151 22178 22667 22668 22676 22812 22851 22499 22975 3,966.32 14,8rJ.64 697 516 6 1 GIIAC PAYIIE}IT PROCESSING CENTER CAPI TAL EOUIPI.IENT 79697 ARCH YIRELESS co,tru[lcATtoils SOUTIIIIO@ PLUI{BING DEPOSIT REFUNDS ROBENTS AND BRUIIE xtsc. suPPLtEs S''IITH GROI,P JJR PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S 8/'t,49 101 66100 800 310.36 101 66210 160 300,00 731 22520 3,150.00 320 75110 210 172-53 101 68020 160 2300 101 56100 210 3001 526 69020 210 THE }IEIRIE OLDE CHRIST}IAS CAROLE 22584 COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 101 68010 220 1452 275.40 r01 68020 160 2200 8,954.00 618 64520 225 920.85 529 68030 120 7970a IIG LEGALS PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERI I SINC 23021 73.42 101 64200 150 73.42 275.40 392,25 527 (6.520 120 485,80 10r 65200 140 CITY OF BURLIIIGA}IE IJARRANT REGISTER 11/16t01 VENOOR DETAIL,*r Denotes Hshd tlritten Checks PAGE 7 Ali0ul,lT 526.21 200.00 1 , 130.38 90.72 530.00 1 ,065 .99 955,50 83.12 275.00 175.00 45.00 12,108.50 87.29 'l ,075 .00 NUI,IBER NAI.IE 79679 79680 79681 796€'2 79683 79681 79645 796€,6 79687 79ffi 796A9 79690 79691 79692 GE CAPITAL EoutPIEIT itAl[T. CIIRISTT}IA LEIJIS COIITRACTTIAL SERVICES CARTER I}IDUSTRIES INC. SI,IPPL I ES FRAIICoTYP-PoSTALtA, lNC. COiITRACTUAL SERVICES 0x cAr,tERA PRooUCTIo S PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S PEEK TRATFTC PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES JAC(IE COOPER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES cITICoiP VEITDOR t It{AitCE, I}lC, EOUIPI.IEIT iIAII{T. FI LTERTRESH COFfEE EXCELLENCE BLDG. & GRCI,ilDS I.IA I }TT. PORTOSAiI RENTS & LEASES UALT TOHNERT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SKYHAI]KS SPORTS ACADEI.IY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CINGULAR I'IRELESS cs{}ru}l I cAT I or,rs EI LEE}I P. GOLOEIIBERG CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20390 20673 20967 21177 21317 21469 21623 21656 21711 21747 218r',6 ACCOUNT 200.00 101 58010 220 1452 90.72 101 65100 220 530.00 101 64560 210 81 .87 38/.,12 10't &240 210 320 AO232 220 955.50 101 68010 220 1342 83.12 101 65200 200 275-OO 621 &450 190 175.00 529 68050 180 4400 45.00 101 68010 220 1581 12,108.50 l0't 68,010 220 1347 a7.29 526 69020 160 1,075.00 101 58010 220 1346 n693 SA},I I4ATEO CO,,I{TY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 I,IISCELLANEOUS 15,850.00 101 37010 '13,850,00 20216 526.21 101 61250 200 1,130,38 620 15000 21521 21701 CITY OF BURL I I,IGAI.IE I'ARRA}IT REGISTER 11116/01 VENDOR OETAILrl' Denotes Hard Uritten Checks PAGE 6 AI.iCT',NT 1 ,OO4.4O 678.00 I ,070.02 382.50 162.44 228.80 107.90 334.07 5.610,94 45.36 471,65 28,815.1' 2,n8.20 385.00 STEVEN BAU}I C€IITRACTUAL SERVICES 79ffi ACCESS UIII FOR}IS & EI,IBROIDERY UII I FORI,IS AND EOUIPI{EiIT IIYSTER SALES CO}IPAIIY STREET RESURFACII{G EXPENSE LABOR READY, INC. ]EIIPORARY E}IPLOYI'IENT SVC. VALLEY CREST TREE CO}IPATY ISCELLAIIE(IIS PREFERRED ALLIA}ICE PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES BURTOIIIS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS TAI}IT. ACCoUIIT 1,004.40 101 66.210 226 678.00 526 69020 011 1,070.02 731 22560 162-44 527 66520 140 224.40 101 64420 210 107.90 101 65200 220 NU}I8ER NAI.iE 79664 79665 79666 79667 79669 79670 79672 79674 n675 I AGE AXT INC. COiITRACTUAL SERVICES I.I I SCE L LAT EqJS 220.00 114.07 320 71030 120 320 80190 210 4,492.91 718.03 101 65300 220 731 2251a 1&70 14659 18713 18959 '18990 19025 19027 19083 19145 19205 19366 19397 19561 19710 I'ILSEY & HAI.I PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALTZED S 79676 PO'ER gASHING SERVICE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 796n ALL FENCE CoIPA]IY, rirc. Pt,{P EOUIPI.IEIIT REPAIR 45.36 101 64100 290 47',1.65 101 65200 205 28,816.',t3 320 78290 210 2,n8.20 101 66210 210 385 -00 527 66520 230 79678 AoN RrS( SERVICES lilC IIISCELLINEOUS 20100 3,406.00 618 64520 038 3,406.00 382.50 101 68010 220 1580 79671 AilG ilET.ISPAPERS I,IISC. SUPPLIES PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALIzED S 79673 A}IBIAXCE TLORAL STUDIO I.I I SCELLAI{EOUS IXPENSE NUI.IBER NAI.IE 79650 79651 79652 79653 79654 79655 79656 79657 79658 79659 79660 79661 7962 GOLDEII NURSERY I.I I SC, SUPPLIES ilISC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLTES 101 68020 120 320 78l.90 120 526 69020 120 PAGE ' AH0UltT 73.37 582.58 161.59 532.45 38.8a 240.36 319.68 153.58 1,023.50 200.00 1,350.00 223.25 199.00 VENDOR DETAIL '*r Denotes Hsnd Llritten Checks 79&9 u{,NICIPAL I.IAIiITENA}ICE SUPPLIES 1691 't 17128 17141 17402 17414 17153 17497 17546 't7547 17938 18078 18103 18321 73.37 620 15000 582,58 101 68020 140 2500 cmTAs coRP. #464 UNI FORIIS A}ID EOUIP}IENT 220043.16 .11 27.9 CALI FOR},IIA COIISERVAT ION CORPS III SCELLAIIEq'S EXPETSE IIETRO }IO8I LE Cq{iUNICATIOilS EoutPilElrl r,rAml. PRTDE PAINT 8LDG. & GROUNDS IlAtNT. RO, C E[VtnON E]ITAL STREET RESURFACIXG EXPEIISE COLORPRI}IT D IGITAL OFFICE EXPEIISE OTFICE EXPEiISE II I -TECII EI.IERGENCY VEIIICLE FIRE APPARATUS I,IAIIIT. IIRE APPARATUS I,IAIIIT. PIO}IEER RA}IDUSTRIAL EoUIP EIIT AIllt- CAL I FORIIIA MUII I CI PAL OFTICE EXPEIISE PARA!,IOUNf I S GREAT AI.IERI CA COIITRACTUAL SERVICES CRANE PEST CONTROL PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S INSTTTUTE OF TRANSPORTAT IO}I DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5,000.00 l0l 65200 290 ,32.45 r01 65100 200 38.88 101 68020 190 2200 240.36 101 66210 226 100.98 218,70 101 64420 110 526 69020 110 198,22 -6t4.& tol 55200 203 625 65213 203 1,023.30 101 68010 200 1586 200.00 101 61250 110 223.25 619 64160 210 5110 199,00 101 66100 240 n663 SIERRA }IOREIIO I.IERCANTI LE CO. SI.IALL IOOLS 18357 119.56 101 68020 150 2300 119.56 CI]Y OF BURLINGAI.IEHARRANT REGISTER 11/16t01 15629 ACCOUNT 5,000.00 1,350.00 101 68010 220 1212 CITY OF BURLINGA}IE LIARRA}IT REGISTER 'lt 116/01 VENDOR DETAIL.*' Denotes Hard gritten Checks PAGE 4 NUI'IBER IIAI.IE 79631 79635 79538 79639 79643 79645 CRAIG }'. REED COTITRACTUAL SERVICES ACCOUNT 791.00 101 68010 220 '1581 4n.01 527 6[,520 120 176.95 101 &210 120 240,00 101 66?10 120 53.17 619 54460 210 5180 1,398.38 731 22560 359.36 101 68020 190 2200 4,082.03 101 30400 6.85 526 69020 110 402,00 101 54420 z',t0 ALERT D@R SERVICE, I },IC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85.00 30.00 101 68020 210 619 &460 210 5150 09881 '10059 10077 10256 11020 11773 13713 14592 11750 14957 15250 15427 16225 AMOUITT 791.00 115,00 1n.01 176.95 210.00 53.17 '1 ,398.38 369.36 4,082.03 6.85 402.00 71 .72 195.52 270,25 79636 3T EoUIPilEt{T C0. I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 79637 AUqjST SUPPLY, lltc 'IISC. SUPPLIES DOROTIIY OI GRADY ilISC. SUPPLIES CO.II.IAIR I.{ECHAII I CAL SERVICES PROfESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 79640 EOETIII}IG TREELAND FARI.IS, INC. I.IISCELLAilEOIJS 79612 HIIIDERLITER, DE LLAI.IAS I.IISCELLAilEqJS I{ICHAEL'S REIITALS I}IC. OFTICE EXPEXSE N&4 PARKII{ SECURTTY COIISULTA}ITS PROFESSIOITAI & SPECIALIZED S I'I LLBRAE LOCK SHOP I,IISC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 79616 r.r D LIIE]I SERVICE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 79647 'r0SS RUBBER & EClt lPllEllT CORP. TRAI}II}IG EXPE}ISE 24$101 68020 't20 2200 620 15000 7 61 195.52 101 65200 220 270,25 527 66520 260 79518 CO4I.IU}I I IY GATEPATH PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL!ZED S 16575 217-50 101 6.210 210 217 .50 N&1 IORIHERN CAL I FORNIA BLDG. & GRqJTDS I.IAINT. 15739 CITY OF BURLINOUEl,ARNANT REG I STER 11t16t01 VENDOR DETAIL '*' oenotes Hand trritten Checks 101 t0t 101 101 101 t0l 101 101 529 E1 68010 68010 68020 680t0 68010 64100 68020 68020 68030 22545 101 68020 tot 68020 10t 68020 101 68020 101 55200 PAGE 3 A C[rNT 3,m.71 792.18 558.63 183 - 50 I ,088.00 53,52 8,256.20 2,310.a0 198,20 ACC(rJNT 03910 79621 ALLSTAR RE EOUtpr{ENT, IilC. CAPITAL EOUI PiIENT 03938 79625 EURLIIIGA}IE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH OFFICE EXPEIISE I,I I SC. SUPPLI ES U}I I FOR!{S A}ID EOUIPMENT 8LDG, & GRot XDS t{ IilT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ]RAVEL & I{EETI}IGS TRAI}IING EXPENSE CAPITAL EOUIPI{EIIT BLDG. & GRqJNDS MAIilT. tScELLAItECUS NUiISER NA}IE n623 79625 79631 79632 531 .02 935.06 167 -40 717.40 396. 55.90 365,34 '183.59 98,00 327.11 110 120 140 190 220 250 260 800 190 1100 1100 2200 1100 1314 2300 2100 4200 n2.14 101 65200 800 LY}IGSO GAROEN I,IATERIALS it I sc. suPPLtEs I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SAFETY KLEEN CORP. I,IISC. SUPPLIES ABAG . LIABILITY PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECTALIZEO S CLAII,IS PAYIIE}ITS OLE IS FIRE APPARATUS I.IA I IIT. 208 359 101 68020 120 2200 526 69020 120 09'143 09518 09626 89 74 09164 79627 TES]IXG E}IGI NEERS, INC. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 09?70 n6z8 E|ITERTAIIIilENT PUBLICATtONS, INC, COITRACTUAL SERVICES 09538 79629 STERICYCLE, I C. SUPPLIES 09439 79630 181.50 620 66700 120 536.00 320 78290 220 1.088.00 101 68010 220 1212 53.52 101 65200 112 2,626.03 5,640.17 514 64520 210 614 64520 @1 sAN IATEO LA]'X r.rouER SfioP I,I I SC. SUPPLIES SI.IALL TOOLS BLDG. & GROIIIOS }IAINT. EOUI PI.IENT I{AINT. CAPITAL EOUIPI{ENT 2200 2200 2100 2200 70.76 253.34 80.63 180.23 1 ,725,U 120 't30 't90 200 800 198.20 625 65213 203 09790 2&.OO 101 6r.210 120 264.00 536.00 09560 79633 TNTERSTAIE IRAFFIC xlsc. suPPLlEs CITY OF BURL I IIGAI.IE [,ARRA}IT REGISTER 11t',l6t01 PAGE 2 NU}IBER NAI.IE 79614 79615 n616 79614 79619 n620 n621 79622 ACCOUNT 157.60 620 15000 5?6 69020 '120 526 69020 803 10t 65200 203 620 '.t 5000 620 66700 120 AMOUNT 157.60 8,264.92 400,94 217 .O8 163.67 t 0.23 8,275 .21 312.78 9,636.44 422.00 246.62 79613 US IILTER II I SC. SUPPLIES CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT INC. 02880 02898 03002 03041 0305/r 03080 05380 03571 6,395,55 1 ,U9,37 III LLBRAE LU}IBER CO. usc. SUPPLIES SIIALL T@LS BLDG. & GRCUNDS I,IAI}IT. SIDEgALK REPAIR EXPENSE 101 &210 120 '10't 55200 130 tol 66020 190 2200 101 &210 219 12,a2 88.05 20.09 279.98 IIATIONI'IOE UIRE & BRUSH MFG. EOUIPIIENT ilA I NT. PACI FIC NURSERIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES I.IISCELLANEOI,,S 79617 P. G. & E. GAS & ELECTRIC PACI FIC BELL UTILITY EXPENSE PATTERSON PARTS, I IIC FIRE APPARATUS 'IAINT.SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES PI,I'P REPATR SERVICE CO. PU}IP EOUIPI.IEI'T REPAIR SAN I.IATEO COUIITY EIIVI RO}.IiIENTAL tl l sc. suPPLlEs 217,08 101 56210 200 10.23 527 66520 170 a,275.21 896 20281 81 .26 200.71 50.81 166,07 .19 -6,O1 97 .25 &.42 101 58020 120 2200 7t1 22560 101 66100 110 101 66100 t20 526 69020 120 9,636,44 527 66520 230 422.00 620 66700 1?O STYLINE SUPPLY CO., OFTICE EXPEISE III SC. SUPPLIES !r l sc. suPPLtEs VENDOR OETAIL '*i Denotes Hsnd Uritten checks 79612 HoUARD JollES BATTERIES, rNC. 02625 SUPPLIES 03106 03197 CITY OT BURLINGAI.{E [,ARRA}IT REGISTER 11t16/01 VEI,IDOR DETAIL.*. Denotes Hand llritten Checks 1,332.50 349.03 5,809.86 547.97 376.60 2,717 .96 879,80 4,000.00 ACCOJNT 101 680',t0 101 68010 101 68010 101 58010 PAGE 'I AMOUNT 8,039.36 513,69 1 ,005. 14 7,974,36 1 ,875.00 61.40 998.38 2,517.7O 1 ,200.00 101,629.80 204.92 NUI.IBER }IAI.IE 79600 79601 79602 79603 n601 79605 n606 n60a 79609 79610 HARBOR SANO & GRAVEL IIISC. SUPPLIES I.IISC. SUPPLIES BREIITON SAFETY, INC. TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IE OFFICE EXPENSE I.IISC. SUPPLIES COX'RACTUAL SERVICES CAPI TAL EOUIPTIEIIT 408.35 105.34 101 66210 120 527 &5ZO 120 101 65210 260 527 66520 2@ ACT IOiI CLEANING SERVICE TE}IPORARY EI.IPLOYIIEIIT SVC. EOUIP}IE}IT iIATNT. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 8LDG. & GR(I,INOS I.IAIIIT. 101 55100 011 101 65400 200 619 64160 220 5110 621 &450 190 01030 01315 01400 01857 02027 02036 02041 021'10 110 120 220 800 1100 1323 1100 1100 503.07 503.07 L. N. CURTIS & SONS UNI FOR}iS AiID EOU I PI.IEIIT CAPITAL EOI'I P}IE}IT 79607 DULItt ADVERTISIIiG lllc. PUBLICATIOIIS & ADVERTI SING LEAGUE OF CALIFORI{IA CI T IES TRAVEL & IIEETII,IGS GCS }IESTERN POIIER & SUPPLIES IIACEK DENIIAOT,I CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES 1,875.00 101 65200 250 61.40 620 15000 255.25 743.13 101 65200 140 620 66700 800 1,200.00 101 58010 220 1347 US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 81D6. & GRCI'NDS I,IAIIIT. PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 636 883 109 327 79440 210 527 &530 190 527 66530 210 [,,[,, GRAI]IGER, l llc, BLDG. & GR(IJI{OS }IAIiIT. }IISC. SUPPLTES 169.33 55.59 101 65200 190 619 &460 120 54 38 97 3 02244 05 139.97 545.94 't0't 66210 219 101 &210 226 685.91 t' 2,517.70 101 64120 150 01624 01745 79611 GRA}IITE R@X CO}IPANY SIOEI'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFACING EXPE}ISE 02261 STAFF REPORT ro: HONORABLE MAYOR AI\ID CITY COIINCIL DATE: I)ecember28r200l AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE L/7 /02 9e BY BYFRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/ Administrative Seryices Director 650-558-7222 SUBJECT: STATUS OF RCN FIBER CABLE INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only, and no Council action is required at this time. BACKGROUND: In August 2000, Council adopted a cable system franchise agreement with RCN Telecom Services. The agreement provided for installation of a fiber optic cable system offering telephone, cable TV and Internet services to residents. The franchise included a planned installation schedule that spanned six years, with the majority of the installation occurring in the first four years. Year l, which has just been completed, promised l5 "nodes", the neighborhood units that serve approximately 150 residences. RCN's status report is attached. They have completed 23 nodes, and await a final decision by PG&E regarding electric meter placement, at which time the nodes can be activated. The attached map shows the service area that has been completed. No work has commenced beyond the area shown in blue on the map. The schedule for the remaining installation of nodes is as follows: 2002 20 nodes 2003 20 nodes 2004 15 nodes 5 nodes 5 nodes 2005 20a6 The recession has taken a heavy toll on telecommunications companies, and RCN has been retrenching along with the others. In discussing this report with RCN stafi it is apparent that a lingering recession will impact the company's ability to secure financing in the capital market. San Carlos, Belmont and Millbrae face the same prospects with RCN, since they adopted their agreements at the same time we did, as part of a joint negotiation. RCN staffhas conveyed this information to James Quinn, the Burlingame residint who has expressed interest in the progress of their installation. At this point, RCN is in compliance with their franchise, and the only reason for delay is related to pG&E's meter issue. RCN estimates this will be resolved and service will be activated in the next three months. I will continue to monitor progress and keep in contact with the other cities involved in construction with RCN. The anniversary date of the agreement is November 9, the date on which the letter of credit was submitted. ATTACHMENTS: Map of RCN Construction Progress RCN Letter,12-21-2001 RCN Services Pamphlet C: David Hankin, Vice President, RCN Telecom Services David A. Hankin Vice President Regulatory & Govemnrent 1400 Fashion Island Blvd.Suitelo0 San Mateo U 94404 (6so) 212-8010 Fax (650) 212-8009 December 2I,2OOI Mr. Rahn Becker Assistant City Manager City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 Dear Mr. Becker: This letter serves to provide the City of Burlingame ("City") a report on the status of RCN providing cable television, high speed internet access, and local and long distance services to the residents ofthe City. RCN has constructed and is ready to activate approximately 3000 homes in the City. The area where RCN has constructed is highlighted in blue on the attached map. Whereas our franchise agreement requires construction of 15 nodes in the first year, the blue area represents completion of23 nodes. RCN has been ready to activate its system and serve customers since August 2001. However, the reason RCN has not been able to provide our services in Burlingame, to date, has been the inability to have our power supplies turned on by Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E"). In January of 2001, PG&E changed its policies with respect to metering power supplies and notified its potential customers that as of May 2OOl, a new metering process would be implemented. Prior to May 2001, PG&E had not required power supplies to be metered. Apparently, PG&E believes they are losing revenue from charging a flat rate and consequently, decided that metering was a more accurate measure of power usage. To date, PG&E has not completed the implementation of the new metering process. RCN is continuing to work out metering issues with PG&E. These issues include height and type of meter pans to be located on the poles, as well as the procedures for the review and activation of power supplies. We are optimistic that the metering issues for the first construction phase will be resolved within the next three or four weeks and we will then be able to provide the City with our services by March 2002. RCN's plans to construct and activate the second phase of our network are subject to the availability of capital from the public markets. We are hopeful that the current economic downturn will ease in the coming year and the capital markets will, once again, be providing capital for economic development. Enclosed for your information are copies of the various costs saving packages that we will be offering Burlingame residents. We look forward to providing our iuray of cable television and telecommunications services to the City in the near future. Sincerely fl^,Z{"-b"-' David Hankin Enclosures ,/dl fr{H€38 Srut, f,r't'Bl]M BJruNGAME CALFOffI.{A IW 4TH OUARTEB 2OO1 STATUS BURLINGAME LEGEND @ 1sr oTR. 2oo2 COMMERCIAL AREA/MULTI-DWELLING UNITS * I TBD * coNSTRUcTIoN PENDING AccESS AGREEMENTS +Iq n PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION i AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 1t7 t2002 9t STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Council BY DATE: December 31.2001 Mr FROM: Larrv E. Anderson. Citv Attomev STjBJECT: APPROVE UNIT REDUCTION FOR ASSESSMENT BASIS FOR BEL.MATEO MOTEL FROM 32 UNITS TO 23 UNITS UNDER THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION: Approve reduction in unit count for assessment basis for Bel-Mateo Motel from32 units to 23 units DISCUSSION: At the November 19,2001, meeting the Council adopted the assessments for the 2002 year for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Assessment District. Unfortunately, the assessment for the Bel-Mateo Motel was based on a total of 32 rooms, and the Motel has informed us that there are actually only 23 rooms for rent. Therefore, it is recommended that the assessment basis count be reduced from 32 rooms to 23 rooms, which will save the Motel about $400 in assessments. This will have no effect on the assessments for any other hotels in the District. Distribution Bel-Mateo Motel Finance Director, City of Belmont Anne LeClair, SMCCVB BY CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION I.'NAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingarne, CA December 10,2001 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 10, 2001, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. II. SEATING OT'I\IEW COMMISSIONERS chairman vistica thanked commissioners chuck Mink and Karen Key for their three and a half months of temporary service to the commission while council recruited to fill the two seats permanently. outgoing c. Mink thanked the commission for the opportunity, complementing the Council on their selection of a beard and the stamina of youth for his replacement, he noted he would continue to follow the progress of the commission and community. Chairman Vistica then introduced the two new commissioners being seated, Christopher Keele and Michael Brownrigg. [I. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keele, Keighran, and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Osterling StaffPresent: city Planner, Margaret Monroe; planner, Erika Lewit; city Attorney, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza rV. MINUTES The minutes of the November 26,2001meeting regular of the planning Commission were approved as mailed. v. APPROVAL oF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. VI. X'ROM THE TLOOR Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, spoke noting that a parking lot has been installed across the sheet from her on the Sisters of Mercy property. She believes this development violates the open Space Element of the General Plan. In addition, the added parking will aggravate the traffic at the congested intersection and create unsafe conditions. She received no notice from the City of the work that was proposed. \TII. APPROVAL OF AGENDA YI[. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1443 IIOWARD AYENUE _ ZONED R.3/C-I - APPLICATION FOR VARTANCE FOR HEIGHT OFFREESTANDING SIGN (CHARLES L. KAVANAGH,APPLICANT; TJNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF BURI PROPER TY OWNER)PLANNER: RI HTIRIN CP Monroe presented a surnmary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: ifthe applicant has considered reversing the location ofthe reader board and the name of the Church on the propor"d sign, so that the sign City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 could be reduced to 6 feet in height and the variance for the height of the sign could be eliminated, the name of the church appears on other signs on that street frontage so identification on this sign is less important. There were no other comments from the commissioners. This item was set for the regular action calendar on January 14,2002, all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department in time. This item concluded at7:16 p.m. 2. 1177 AIRPORT BOULEVARD _ ZONED C-4 _ APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO EXCEED THE BAYFRONT DESIGN GUIDELINES AND FOR CONTROLLED PARKING FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING HOTEL (JONATHAN WINSLOW, WINSHIP PROPERTIES, APPLICANT; NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC., ARCHITECT; AIRPORT BOULEVARD HOTEL LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:]BEN HURIN CP Monroe presented a sunmary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: is the applicant proposing to put an new fence around the entire site, and will the new fence include landscaping along its entire length; how will the hotel's parking work in conjunction with sporting events at the adjacent park, please describe; there seems to be a lot of lighting proposed for the hotel parking lot, especially the "tree lights", how much glare will be created and will it be visible offthe site; applicant should present samples ofthe windowMylar proposed and review the pattern suggested; glad to see that there will be a new fence along the freeway frontage of the site, this should be coordinated with the city's work with CalTrans and the freeway improvements being considered including at the entrance of the hotel, the present fence is dilapidated and the landscaping neglected, can the applicant enter into an agreement with CalTrans to install and maintain the landscaping; concerned about the lack of landscaping on the site, vines are not proposed for all the fencing, how will the applicant guarantee good quality well maintained landscaping on the entire perimeter ofthesite. Staffshoulddocumenthowthefrontlandscapinggotfrom80%requiredto3}o/oandnow to9Yo with this project; the applicant should show the progressive reductions in landscaping on a plan and explain why the current reduction is necessary. Commission comments continued: the applicant should work with the baseball league and city to set out a list of objectives for the parking arrangement with Bayside Park users i.e. such things as free, easily accessible, open to the public and number of parking spaces available; there are discrepancies between the parking shown on the plans and the numbers in the staff report, correct. The applicant should address in detail why they chose the design of the new roof screen which has a bigger impact than the existing mechanical penthouse screen; why was the shape chosen, a curve for example would look less lopsided; what will the landscaping at the front of the site look like from the street, some of the landscaping within the parking lot will be and look artificial (plants in cages and lamp trees). Would like to see a photometric study of lighting on the site, how will the main block of the building be lit, would not like to see flood lighting of the structure. Project could improve safety and access to Bayside Park if a second gate into the park were put at the entry driveway, since parents will cross the street the cross walks these could be marked better; why are landscape items being put in cages; would like more information on the ultimate sizelscale of the poplar trees and how they will scale against the eucalyptus tree backdrop, the fabric tuees should be included in the scale analysis. There were no further comments from the commission. This item was set for the next regular action calendar after the additional information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item eorcluded at 7:35 p.m. -2- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 IX. ACTION ITEMS CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CINSIDERED To BE RIUTINE. THEY ARE ACTED ON SIMULTANEOUSLY WLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/ORACTION IS RESUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PRIOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON THE MOTION TO ADOPT. Chairman Vistica asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 3. 1204 BURLINGAME AVENUE _ ZONED C.1, SUBAREA A _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A REAL ESTATE USE (NICOLAS KOROS, APPLICANT; KIRKBRIDE FAMIL Y, C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staffreport, Commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Boju6s Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0- I (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item conclu ded at 7 :43 p.m. X. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 4.1321 SAIICITEZ AVEI\ITIE - ZOIIED R.2 - APPLICATION FOR SPECI.AL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND SECOND FLOOR SIDE SETBACK VARI,ANCE FORA SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE.FAMILY HOUSE (NAN CROLEY, JOHN MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; RONALD AND KIM RAMSEY PROPERTY OWNER ) (68 NOTICED)PI,ANNER:RUBEN HIIRIN Reference staff report,l2.10.0l, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Jack Matthews, architec! was present to answer questions about the project. He noted that the muntins of the family room window setlt apart from the rest of the house, so he chose not to repeat this design element in the other windows ofthe house; the railing at the rear was changed to add some decorative elements, but it was felt that a heavy balustrade, sucht the one existing at the front porch, could not be supported by the architecture at the rear elevation; the design of the house requires a special permit because the lot is narrow; the side setback variance is minor and the froposedsetback is actually greater than the setback that would be allowed ifthis R-2 property were developed with a duplex. There were no furttrer comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: the design of the house has evolved nicely and the applicant has addressed the changes requested by the Commission. The variance is justified because of the small size ofthe lot and the design of the dwelling is improved by the request for a special permit to exceed the declining height envelope. -J- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 15, 2001, sheets A-El, A-E2, A-2.l,and A-3.3, and date stampedNovember 29,2001, sheetA-3.1;2)that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Offrcial's, and Recycling Specialist's November 5, 2}}l,memos shall be met; and 3) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-l (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:52 p.m. 5. 1509 HOWARD AVENUE _ ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JIRAYR KOUROUYAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; KAM^ATL TABIB, DYNAMIC DESIGNS, DESIGNER) (65 NOTICED)PT,ANNER: CATHERINE ,ON Reference staff report, 12.10.01, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Kamal Tabib, designer, was present to answer questions. The Commission asked if the windows shown are true divided lights. The designer noted that the window type true divided lights was included on the revised plans and that hopefully the owner would install the correct windows. The Commission commented a condition of approval should be added to insure that true divided light windows are used. There were no frrther comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: the applicant has made many changes to this project and has complied with the requests for a 6'-0" porch and landscaping. C. Boju6s moved to approve the application, by resolution and with an added condition that all windows be true divided light windows, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submiued to the Planning Departrnent date stamped October 12,2001Sheets Al,A2, 44, and date stamped November 2g,2OOl Sheets A3 and Ll;2) that the conditions of the City Engineer, Chief Building Official andRecycling Specialistmemosdated October22,200l andNovember 15,2001 shall be met; 3) that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope ofthe first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area ofthe structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4) that all the windows on the approved plans, shown as true divided light windows, shall be installed as the true divided light windows; and 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on the motion: approval includes findings for the proposed front setback variance; the variance is justified because it is less of an encroachment than the original project and because the design of the house I and its fit in the neighborhood are improved by thepresence of a porch. C. Boju6s agreed to the amended motion. -4- 6. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m. 1509 LOS MONTES AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO.STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (RON GROVE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; FRED STRATHDEE, F.R. STRATHDEE & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (45 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:ERIKA LEWIT Referencestaffreport,l2.l0.0l,withattachments. ChairVisticanotedthathewouldabstainfromvoting because of a business relationship with the applicant. He stepped down from the dais Vice Chair Keighran proceeded with the hearing. CP Monroe presented the staffreport, reviewed criteria and staffcomments. Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if staff knew the height of the existing structure. Staffreferred the question to the applicant. Vice Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Ron Grove, applicant and owner was present to answer questions. He noted that the proposed two-story house is just 3'-0" higher than the existing house. He has made an effort to make changes to the plans to address Commission concems, including installing story poles and re-routing the driveway to save the bay free on the lot. He pointed out that there are numerous two-story houses in the neighborhood and that the floor area of the proposed house is 500 SF less than the amount the code allows. He noted that no views will be blocked by the proposed house. Susan Smith, 1515 Los Montes Drive, spoke concerning the proposed house. She feels that the story poles do not show the whole picture or impact of the new house; she will lose a view from the living room of her house, looking south; the house does not fit into the neighborhood; %)% of thehomes have attached garages and this house has a detached garage. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: story poles were a great help in evaluating the project; the proposed height is only 3'-0" higher than the existing; the Bay tree has been saved on the property; there are other homes ofthis size in the neighborhood. C. Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution. There was no second on the motion to approve. Further Conrmission discussion: height of the proposed project is not greatly increased over the existing height; the roof lines ofthe house are blended well; an attached garage would make the house look massive; the proposed detached garage is pedestrian friendly; the design of the house is still too massive; a smaller project would be more appropriate to the fabric of the neighborhood; not having an attached garage with doors on the street is an asset to the neighborhood; the project has been greatly improved by the design review process. Vice Chair Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent date stamped November 30,2001, sheets A1, ,{4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,2}}l,sheets 42 and 43, and date stamped October 12,2001, sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;2)thatany changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and -5- 7, City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building Official's May 7, 2001 , memos shall be met; 4) that the dimensions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l' -0" x2l' -0"; 5) that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing Bay tree at the left side of the property shall remain after construction; 6) that no fence or other permanent structure shall be erected inthe 5'-0" public sewer easement located at the rearofthe property; 7) thattheproject shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Discussion on the motion: in redesign the size of the house was reduced by only a minor amount, 300 SF, from the original application. Chairman Vistica called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed ona3'2-l-l (Crs. Boju6s and Keel dissenting, C. Vistica abstaining, C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:20 p.m.. 1147 ROLLINS ROAD - ZONED C.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI-MART (GUS GRECO, APPLICANT; H,P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVERTRUST, PROPERTY owNER) (l NOTICED) PROJECT CATHERINE KEYLON Reference staffreport, 12.10.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staffcomments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: were the trafFrc numbers used to project trips for a mini-mart at this location averages taken from another source or counts bases on this particular location; the numbers were based on mini-mart trip generation from a standard sonrce; the numbers show an increase of 60/o of trips with the addition of a mini-mart, were ttrese gas stations the same size; it is hard to tell since the increase is based on the sum of a number of site specific traffic counts; in one submittal it notes that the County Health Department has approved this use, what does that mean; the applicant should address this. Is it possible to have a cash only ATM? Yes. There seems to be a problem wiitr ttre numbering of the on-site parking spaces on the plans. Access to and from this site is awkward, given the intersection, has the applicant discussed redevelopment of the entire site to improve the use of this site relative to the signalized intersection. This question was directed to the applicant. There were no further questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney, 216 Park Road, representing the property owners Gus and Gladys Greco, noted that the applicant owns two or three other similar gas stations on the Peninsula; which they have converted to mini-marts since this application was submitted the applicant has re-evaluated the proposed operation based on previous comments made by the Commission, including not selling alcoholic beverages; they have found that it is hard to find qualifred mechanics to support the service part of the gas station business, this is an ideal location for a gas station with mini-mart because of its proximity to the freeway; they hired John Wilson to do a traffic impact study and worked on resolving the study parameters with the Engineering Department, the tip generation was based on actual gas sales from the site and adjusted by the increase in trips as documented by the San Diego Association of Govemment trip generation studies for mini-marts, these indicate that there would be 13 more customers with a mini-mart on the site, equivalent of 26 individual trips (13 in and out); feel that adding a mini-mart will not generate a lot more customers but will cause the existing customers to spend more money when they stop for gas; they have had an ATM that only dispenses cash onthe site for several years; concerned about -6- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001 the condition which prohibits a microwave oven to heat up food, think issue of food establishment is covered by not allowing tables and chairs for customers to use; the Health Department review referred to is that they have reviewed the applicant's proposal to serve food and approved it pending city approval of the use; the ingress and egress at the intersection has changed with the new signal, people are using Cadillac Way more, don't feel that one more customer an hour will have a big impact on the intersection, the traffic consultant did not feel that an access study was necessary; applicant does not think that this will become a7-ll, because of the number of existing gas sales, 7-l I sells alcoholic beverages which attracts customers and in the San Diego studies the size of the mini-mart did not seem to be a factor in fip generation, the key was pass by traffic. Commissioner noted that this mini-mart is bigger than any of the others in the city at this time. Applicant noted that the Chevron station sells twice as much gas as the Union 76 station so would have more customers. Commissioner asked if this particular location was factored into the trip generation numbers. Applicant did not know. Commissioner asked if there were any hazardous wastes on the site; applicant noted that when the tanks were replaced the site was cleaned up, they will not just redo the floor of the service bays, they will replace it for compliance with County requirements. Commissioner; do not understand why the size of the mini-mart does not affect the number of customers attracted, could information about change in number of customers from your other sites after installation ofmini-marts beprovided, where are the applicant's other stations; what about shift in customers from 7-l l to this site; applicant noted that they did not recall being asked to count customer levels at the 7-l I and none of their other sites are accessed offa freeway, they are all along El Camino Real. Commissioner clarified that the 1695 SF area for the mini-mart included the storage area and rest rooms; yes. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing wasclosed. Commission discussion: the comparison with other mini-marts in the city does not work in this case, need to consider the location; the nearby 7-l I is S}Yolaryerbut has 600%more customers; did site visit at 7-l 1 andduring the 20 minutes all the customers came from the north passing by the gas station; people will stop at the gas station for lunch, using the microwave, the ATM also increasis the reasons to stop, togetherdiverted 7- I I pass by traffic, ability to microwave lunch, ATM etc. could increase the number of customers at the gas station by 700-900 customers, have studied location and this could become a nightnare, difficult to support. Concemed about the comparative table because the sales area in each existing mini-mart may rroihur. included rest rooms and storage, the 7-11 has 10 on site parking spaces and this gas station is providing 12 so there will be no impact there, now there is a signal at the inters..tio, customers must use which imprwes access over the present sifuation, customers will prefer 7-1 1 because they sell alcoholic beverages, presenceof microwave improves convenience. Concerned about traffrc and increasing the attractiJn to the gas station, easier to stop here than 7-11 and it is more attractive, table may not be perfect comparison but anticipate there will be more than 250 customers here after the mini-martis built based on localtion; signal has not resolved access problem, cannot support based on the numbers given, need a more accurate study.Not opposed to the location ofthis mini-mart, but no.tconvinced by the tratrrc data that there will be this fewcustomers. One way to tell if this site will compete with 7-11 is for the applicant to tell us the number ofitems with skew numbers, if it is fewer than 7-l l then 7-l t will be the bltter choice for a customer, thiscomparative information should be provided before a decision is made. Concemed that we will create another 7- I I , with a volume of customers at the gas station which exceeds 600 a day, the traffic at the stationlocation is diffrcult and dangerous, cannot support. C' Bojuds moved by resolution to deny the conditional use permit and take-out permit to convert threeservice bays to a mini-mart at the existing gas station because of the negative impact on traffic at thislocation. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. -7- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 Comment on the motion: CA Anderson pointed out for the new commissioners that a denial would not allow the applicant to resubmit this same request for a mini-mart for a year, a denial without prejudice would allow the applicant within 90 days to revise his request, if he wished, and resubmit it for further consideration; given the choices think applicant should be allowed to address the traffic and customer issues raised with a new valid study, also should include a market study of new customers and diverted 7-ll customers based on this location, the study should be done by a firm that deals in market studies forthis type of business, the results of the study can then be translated in to traffic impacts, so would suggest a denial without prejudice. Would also ask that the sales area of this proposed mini-mart and sales volumes be "o-p*"d to ttre sales areas and volumes of the other mini-marts owned by this applicant. Traffic study needs to be amplified as discussed and better sampling used. The maker and second of the motion agreed to amend the motion to be a denial without prejudice. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice the application for a mini- mart at ll47 Rollins Road. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised, noting that the item was subject to appeal until the date of the next City Council meeting on January 7,2002. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m. XI. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 8. 229 DWIGHT ROAD - ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GARAGE LENGTH AND TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COVERED PARKING SPACES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDINON (JOHN MAMSCALCO, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; RICK ESCOBAR, PROPERTY OWNER) ( NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT ZiI Lewitbriefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Maniscalco, architect, was presentto answer questions. He noted that the addition was designed to fit the character of the existing single story house. The existing garage must be removed because of the first floor additions; the new proposed garageabuts a greenhouse of .i,olt* length on the property to the left. The extended garage will be used for storage of yard tools and possibly a boat in the future. The Commission asked about the necessity of the skylights on the north elevation and if they would be tinted; why did the architect chose to use a shed dormer; is the change in materials from stucco on the side elevationsto siding at the rear intentional. The applicant responded that the skylights are needed because of the high ceiling treight in the living room and whileuntinted, they have interior automatic shades; the shed dormer was used to create livable rpu." in the proposed loft without changing the single-story appearance of the house; and the change in exterior material was intentional because the sfucco at the side elevation matches the existing house and the siding at the rear elevation is in keeping with the deck an outdoor design. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C. Keighran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked: . The garage should have a barge rafter extended from the roof to make it appear symmetrical; -8- 9, City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 . Clari& plans to show whether the access door for the proposed garage is a solid hinged door or a glass slider, both are currently shown on plans; and o The trim on the existing windows should be carried to all windows in the addition, in particular those on the shed dormer and the upper window on the west elevation.. Comment on motion: the design is very nice and the proposed addition has a minimal impact on the neighbors. The special permits for the garuge are warranted because the garage will not impact the neighbors since it is adjacent to a similar building at their side property line and the design complements the main dwelling. This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s. Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6'0-l (C. Osterling absent). The planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:3b p.m. 840 NEWHALL ROAD _ ZOIYED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DETACHED GARAGE WIDTH FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JERRY DEAL, JD AND ASSOCIA TES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNE& ROBERT AND GERMAIN ALFARO , PROPERTY OWNERS) (48 NOTI PROJECT PI SEAN O'ROI ZT Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Jerry Deal, designer, was present to answer questions. He noted that 600 SF dimensions ofthe garage are the result of the o*.r"r **iing to park two .*. i1th. garage as well as being able to use it for storage. He explained that there is a request for a front setback variance for the new house because the property niurows from the rear to the front and because the required setback creates a lot of space in the front yard that is not private while at the same time reducing the size of the backyard. He noted that two other newer houses on that block had setbacks similar to the sitback proposed with this project. The Commission commented that there did not appear to be any special circumstances on the lot to justiff a variance; the character in the neighborhood is predominantly very large front setbacks; the design of the house is very nice; if the applicant complies with the required front setback, the private space in the backyard can then be increased by eliminating the extra storage space attached to the garage. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C. Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked: o Eliminate the variance for front setback because there is no hardship on the lot. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. -9- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001 Comment on motion: all of the Commissioners seated conctured with the recommendation listed above. Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to place this item on regular action calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at9:44 p.m. 1520 LOS MONTES DRIYE - ZONED R-1 _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE, AND HILLSIDEAREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FORA FIRSTAND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS RUFFAT, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANTAND ARCHITECT; ED 10. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. The Commission asked staff if there was a measurement included in the code to differentiate between remodels and new homes based on the demolition proposed for a project. Staff replied that the only distinction is based on the amount of floor area added. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, and EdNeale, owner, were present to answer questions. The architect noted that the FAR variance is the result of the way the code calculates floor area under the new deck; the space undemeath the deck is counted as living area though it could never be used as such without undertaking major work on the space. The owner noted that the request for an FAR variance is so that he can have a deck at the rear of the dwelling at the same floor where the main living area is in order to fully enjoy the property. The Commission noted that the plans needed to clariffthe type ofwindows and trim proposed; the house has many Craftsman details on the front elevation, but these details have not been carried through to the other elevations; is there another way to address the front entrance so that there isn't just a single pillar supporting the front porch; there is so much demolition occurring with this project it is almost a replacement so it is logical to think that an FAR variance could be eliminated. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C. Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following direction given: o Repeat the Craftsman details shown on the front elevation on the right, left, and rear elevations; o Detail what type of windows and trim are proposed; and o The FAR variance should be eliminated because there is no hardship on the propefi to justiff it; ifthe deck is retained, floor area should be eliminated from somewhere else in the house so that the proposal meets code requirements. This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s. Comment on motion: all of the Commissioners seated concurred with the recommendations listed above. Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at l0:03 p.m. -10- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10, 2001 11. 1415 BENITO AVENUE _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FORDESIGN REVMW FORA FIRSTAND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW DETACTMD GARAGE (JOHNNY DAROSA, DAROSA AhID ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; PETER AND SHIRLEY CHIANG, PROPERTY owNERS) r60 NOTICED) PRO.IECT PLANNER: SEAN O,R CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Johnny DaRosa, applicant and designer, was present to answer questions. Randy VandenBrink, l4l2 Alvarudo Avenue, spoke to request that the plans show if the existing trees at the rear of the property will remain after construction and noted that there is an existing basement i" tt ir house which was not shown on the plans. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C. Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following direction given: o House design does not fit with the neighborhood; proposed house is too bold and busy, needs to be softened; o Applicant should provide a detailed landscape plan to show existing and proposed landscaping including trees to be retained on site it is important that the scale of the tu"arrupi"g match the scale of the house and that new plantings be designed to soften and screen the addition iom neighbors and from the street; o Window trim needs clarification, the proposed trim is heavy and appears to overpower the windows; t Applicant should provide a two-car garage and at the same time, can improve the massive appearance of the garage by showing two garage doors instead of one door; o The triangular-shaped transoms above the windows are not consistent with the style of the house; o The pop-up window in the garage should be eliminated; o The windows on the right and left elevation are very Iarge and will have a big impact on the neighbors; can they be scaled-down or screened with landscaping; and o Current proposal is like a layer-cake; would like to see some variation in the eave lines and articulation to break up the massive appearance of the house; This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chairman Vistica called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant The motionpassed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). The Plaruring Commission's action is advisory and notappealable. This item concluded at l0:18 p.m. -l l- City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 10,2001 XU. PLANNERREPORTS Review of Joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting ofNovember28,200l and City Council regular meeting of December 3, 2001. - CP Monroe reviewed the Council actions at their meeting on December 3,2001. . The November 28,2001Joint City council/Planning Commission meeting were not noticed on the calendar for approval so will be placed on the January 14,2002 agenda for approval. Issues for February Joint Session Commissiondiscussed items whichmightbe considered atthe Joint CityCouncil/PlanningCommission meeting in February. It was noted that there were four items which were to be carried over from the November Joint meeting; also that it might be appropriate to review progress on the SAP for the north end of the city. Staffnoted that because of a delay the DEIR for the Safeway project at 1450 Howard Avenue would not be available until the third week of January 2002, so the Planning Commission's special meeting to take public comment on the DEIR study should be delayed from January 30 to a later date in February to provide the public time to review the DEIR document. February 20 was discussed as an option for a new date. Open Study Meeting on Housing Element Ci Monroe reminded the Commission that a special open study meeting on the Draft Housing Element would be held on December 19, 2OOl,in the Council Chambers. The focus ofthe discussion would be the Goals, policies and Action Program. Changes would be incorporated and the document prepared to be forwarded to City Council in January,2002, Following Council review ofthe draft it would be sentto the State for their comment. XII. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Vistica adjourned the meeting atl0:47 p.m. Respectfu lly submitted, Joe Boju6s, SecretarY I.]NAPPROVEDMINUTES I ZI O -12- CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the December 19, 2001, special meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Keele, Keighran (arrived at 7:10 p.m.) Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Bojuds, Brownrigg StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; Citv .Affome y, Larry Anderson frr. APPROVAL oF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. IV. STUDY SESSION 1. Review of the Draft Housing Element Update CP Monroe presented an overview of the draft housing element and explained the process. CA Anderson gave an overview of the State requirements for updating housing elements. Commissioners noted that there are sites identified in the element for housing opportunities, would the same opportunities be available to other properties within the proposed residential overlay zones. Staff noted that the identified sites are examples of properties which have the most potential for development, but other properties in the area proposed for the overlay zones could also take advantage of the same opportunities. Chairman Vistica opened the meeting to public comment. Philip Kahn, 1451 Capuchino Avenue, Ed Hayes representing Peninsula Habitd{sr Huma:i5,, Cathy Baylock, 1527 Newlands Avenue, Dan Anderson, 728 Vemon Way, Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington Way, Lee Tanton, 845 Linden Avenue, Skip Brand , !22glaguna Avenue, Chuck Mink, 1541 Los Montes, Diane Condon-Wirgler, 1536 Cypress Avenue, and Connie Mills, 945 Laguna Avenue commented on the Draft Housing Element. Comments included: should look at the ratio between commercial and residential and effects on revenue; interested in affordable housing, non- profits need incentives that help with land costs, reduced parking in transit-oriented development makes the cost of land per unit go down, it might not mean more units but they would be more affordable, should look at density limits for different areas; make sure there is an appropriate transition between high density and existing neighborhoods to provide a buffer; should look at the live/work units, they can provide for transition in commercial and industrial areas; should review parking requirements second 1mitr; should provide oppotunities for affordable senior housing near the hospital; think that the time has come for the community to accept mixed use development; concern with apartments being torn down and replaced with high priced condominiums; should not use reduced parking requirement as incentive in area near Broadway, already parking problems, might encourage residents to use public lots at night, could have uncovered parking rather than in a structure. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December l,9,2001 Commissioners continued discussion, noting that the following items should be added to the housing element work program: tr Make sure there is provision in the element for public agency partnerships for groups like teachers, hospital workers; U Add policy to encourage live work units in the area south of Burlingame Avenue O Look at zoning code changes to provide opportunities for live/work units and mixed use projects; tr Extend design review to multiple family projects as a housing maintenance program; tr Look at changing the eligibility date to qualiff for the second unit amnesty program to include units built after 1954; tr Make it clear in Housing Element that there is very little space in Burlingame for new housing development and document the time, effort and money spent developing this document; O Encourage use of private foundation grants to help fund affordable units; The consensus of the Commission was to forward the Draft Housing Element to the City Council withthe revisions noted above. CP Monroe noted that those in attendance would be notified when the report was to be reviewed by the City Council. Chairman Vistica thanked those who came for their interest and attendance. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Vistica adjoumed the meeting at9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ralph Osterling, Acting Secretary 2 I.]NAPPROVEDMINI-MES I 2. I 9 BT]RLINGAME BEAUTIX'ICATION COMMISSION DECEMBER 6.2001 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5.32 p.m. by Chairperson Locke. ROLL CALL Present Chairperson Locke, Commissioners Camey, Ellis, Lauder, and McGowanStaff: Superintendent Richmond and Administrative Secretary Harvey Absent: Commissioners Efesselgren and Webb Guests: Maria Cav4 Mary Blythe, Gary Blythe, Eric Adler, and Jeanie Adler Chairperson Locke welcomed the new Commissioner Jeanne Camey. Commissioner Camey stated that she has been a resident of Burlingame for 6 years, but has lived in the Bay fuea for manyyears; she is a rytiqed registered nurse, is a member the Women's Club, San Mateo County Fair, and thb Carden Study Club of the Peninsula. Commissioner Camey added that she loves gardening, nature, the environment, and is pleased to be serving on the Commission. MINUTES - Minutes were approved as submitted. CORRESPONDENCE I etter to LeeRoy Kloezemarl 2748 Summit Drive, informing him that the Commission upheld his appeal for the removal of a protected Eucalyptus tree on his property. Letter t9 John Gong, I I Kenmar Way, informing him that the Commission denied his appeal for the removal of a protected Palm tree on his property. Copy of letter to Craig Rossi from Mayor Galligan thanking him for his service on the Burlingame B eautifi cation Commission. Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Craig Rossi thanking him for his service on the Beautification Commission. Copy of letter from Mayor Galligan to Jeanne Camey advising her of her recent appointnent to the Burlingame Beautifi cation Commission. Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Jeanne Camey congratulating her on her appointment to the Burlingame Beautification Commission and information regarding the Commission's bversight. Letter from Gary & Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, appealing the denial of a permit to remove a protected Dawn Redwood tree on their property. Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Gary & Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, ffirming them that their appeal would be heard at the December 66 Beautification Commission meeting. Letter fromEric & Jean Adler, 2111 Easton Drive, appealing the denial of apermit to remove aprotected Yew tree on their properly. Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Eric & Jean Adler, 21 1 1 Easton Drive, informing them that their appeal would be heard at the December 6m Beautification Commission meeting. Memo to the Commission from Superintendent Richmond informing ofnew procedures for appeals of tree removal denials. I F'ROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the floor. OLD BUSINESS ffi.perso, Loct e reviewed the following items with the Commission to be held over to future meetings. Sprins Garden Seminar - Saturdav. March 23, 2902 - Chairperson Locke reported that Tamara Lewis ^eetingand reviewher topic with the Commission. Tree plantine on Old Bavshore Boulevard.- Status Reoort - Commissioner McGowan asked that this item be reviewed at ate the applicants appealing the denials of protected tree removals. - [r Commissioner 's absence, Chairperson Locke asked if these items be carried forward until further information maY be obtained. Commissioner McGowan moved that these ilenx be tabled and moved to a future agenda when dala can be mail.e available to the Commission;seconded Motion canied 5 - 0 - 2 (absent). Commissioner Lauder that this item be tabled and movedto afuture NEW BUSINESS Superintendent Richmond December or January Commission before the Commission. the Commission that Porter would not be at the meetings but could submit a staffreport on either of the appeals currently SuperintendentRichmond statedthat applicant's appealforthe removal ofthetree at 1360 Vancouver Avenue is based on section ti.ti6.-G0taJiizfr"a (Q (z)'of the Urban Reforestation ordinance; to allow for the economic enjoyment of the proiJrty'*a *ri economic consequences and obligatl^ons of requiring a tree to remain. He added th"iffi "ip6anicited concerns about damage to the driveway from the tree's roots. The Cit;*ri a.i.r-i"J tt it tr,. tree is healthy and that any future root problems.could be mitigated by root t *-g;J the placement of root barriers without compromising the structural integrity of the tree. Commissioner Ellis stated that the tree appears to be healthy; that the driveway is very old and appears to be original to the house. Commissioner Camey commented that it is a pretty tree and is not very close to the neighbors house; that the damage to the driveway appea^rs to have been there for quite some time. Chairperson Locke noted that the tree is in the middle and very close to both driveways but speculates that the volunteer Privet tree may be causing the driveway damage' SuperintendentRichmond replied that hairline cracks in concrete driveways can occur n{urally qnd canbe found in other ari"r*uvr * iell. He added that the Dawn Redwood is a deciduous conifer and is not very common in Burlingaml. He noted that there is a large one in the City's Washington Park. Commissioner McGowan remarked that he was raised in the neighborhood of where this tree exists; the tree fr* U"." there for uppro*i-ut ely 25years. He added that DawriRedwoods are very long lived and since it i, pr*i.a i, u ,.rt irt'"J*"", iti,* probably reached i!1 maJurg size. He commented that it seemed unusual tdtffi iequest for removal wouldiome uit.r the resident had lived with the ffee for over 25 years. Chairperson Locke asked if the anyone wanted to address the Commission regarding this appeal. ) (Contd,) - The applican! Gary Blythe, stated that he has lived at 1360 Vancouver snce 1977. His family has enjoyed the tree but his neighbor, Maria Cava (13 56 Vancouver), has asked him to trim the tree in the past because of debris in the roof gutters. He added drat the lawnmower hits one of the tree's roots in his lawn that is 15' away from the trunk. The tree is only 2-3' away from his neighbor' driveway and many of the branches from the tree are on his neighbors side. He concluded that he believes the roots have damaged his driveway. Maria Cav4 13 56 Vancouver Avenue, commented thatthe property belongs to her mother. She commented that her mother is constantly cleaning up the debris from *ris nee. She added that the little needles fall in the roofgutters, clogging the drain pipe and recently requiring repair ofthe gutters and the placement ofscreens. She concluded that the screens have not stopped the little tiny debris from falling into the gutters. Mary Blythe, 1360 Vancouver Avenue, commented that, if approved, they would be willing to plant a tree in the same location; drat they love trees, but this one causes somuch damage and hassle. Ga[, Blythe added that Dawn Redwoods seem to need more room. Commissioner McGowan asked the applicant if the tree had ever been pruned back from the neighbor's property by a professional tree company? Mr. Blythe responded "No", thit he had trimmed back only a few branches because they do enjoy fie shade from the tree.- Aoreal of the Denial to Remove a Protected D Redwood Tree @ 1360 Vancouver Avenue - Commissioner Ellis commented that deciduous trees loose leaves continual clean up, all year long that is the problem. Mrs. Cava responded that it is the rin!-a Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, asked if this fiee could be "limbed up" to help mitigate the debrisprobleq so that not so much is falling? Superintendent Richmond respondei drat ifthe tree -were raised too much tre tree might look odd. Chairperson Locke closed the public comments. Commissioner McGowan stated that the tree is beautifi and he does not believe it will get much larger. He added that this tree can be seen going down Hillside Drive and going up Easton Drive] He concluded thatpruning away from the neighbor's roofline by a professional tree iom[any would help or eliminate t]re debris problem. Commissioner Ellis agreed that the tree is beautifirl and could be pruned to mitigate the neighbor's debris lssue- Chairperson Locke noted that most trees represent some kind ofa nuisance factor. She added, that the tree is. in a narrow space, and that some kind ofroot damage is apparent. She speculated that tttJt ee *itt get biggerand indicated that she was surprised to hear thar th" uppiic-t -o,lld replant a tree in a small area that p l-Ea by two. driveways. Chairperson Locke then'asked the Comrnission if they needed more information from the City's Arborist who was unable to attend this meeting. Connls-siory1 L.IcGowan rcsponded thol he woutd like more informationfrom the City,s Arbort$ andtnoveil thal this item be catieil over to ,he.Febtaaqt 2002 Cominission miatng wt en ilre iity Arbofistcoulil speak to this item arul that,^the applicant proiitc the Commissionwitl ai inacjiaini Arborirf ,leport supporting their rcquest for removal; siconded Motion carried s - 0 - 2 @6sent). Chairperson Locke advised the applicarts that there would be no action on their item but would be continued at the February 76 commission meeting when the city A$orist could be available. J Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Yew Tree @. 2111 EastqB Drive - Superintendgnt to remove the Yew tree based on Section 11.06.060 (a)1S1: . . . the rr.rrriUbr of trees thl particular parcel canlupport Hg.{{ed that the applicants ur" ..q,r.rtirrg removal of the Yew tree because ttrey feel it overshadows and hinders the grovlh of the Camperdown Elm. Superintendent Richmond stated that the adjacent properly _ovfilers have been notified of the removal ;.qugJ;a the department has received no comments. -The City Arborist noted that the Elm in the front ;iililr"p.rry mrgtrt be considered for removal by the qroperfy owner because it has a forked trunk with includid Uart. Ho*ever, he adde{ the City arborist determined the Yew tree to be a healthy, mature rp..i-"n; that removal of the Yew tree *oUa nol necessarily ilPlove thestature.of the Camperdown n't1n; and ihat a larger Elm tree in the area actually overshadows the Camperdown Elm to an even greater extent. Commissioner Lauder commented that the Yew tree is magnificent and removal would cause a large void if it were removed. Commissioner Camey stated that the Yew is taking up space and not allowing light for the Camperdown Elr"; tiltlr" apphc#'s pri*rry concem is to savJtheptm. She addedthatthe CamperdownElm is more significant than the Yew tree. CommissionerMcGowan statedthatmostofthetrees onthe properlywere all planted aboutthe sametime and that yew trees *uully do not grow to that size. nemoving the Yew_tre" "Tght allow for more air -o""-*t*"orgh th;6;"nmUriif small limbs were removedfromtheYew, the CamperdownElm's growth might be improved. Commissioner Ellis noted that there is damage to a private walkway that appears to be damaged by the large Elm in the area- Chairperson Locke asked if anyone from the audience wished to address the Commission regarding this appeal. Eric Adler, 21 1l Easton Drive, stated that the older trees on his properly arc overgrowing ang .lo*di"q the other trees on hi;;."p"rtla' The Camperdown eln is starting t6 lean;.light comes from the East and "l"i"ifigf,t is being 6sf H; added that they have-cared fo1 an{ s91e to the gx.pense of having the large gfrn i" fr6nt cabled"and are not asking to remove this tree, but the Yew tree is just too big. Jeanie Adler, 2l I I Easton Drive, commented ttrat the Camperdown Elm had an umbrella shapetyt is n9w starting to lean o".r -JGufr oot lut . She added th4 a_qrofe.ssional tree cgmpanl has advised them that there are too many trees in that one area and since the iew is closest to the walkway believes that it is causing the damage to the walkwaY' Mrs. Adler then submitted copy of a letter from Peninsula Tree Care representative, William Kleinheinz. Commissioner McGowan asked if theYew tree had ever been professional trimmed? Mrs. Adler stated that it had been trimmed several yearc ago. Chairperson Locke closed the public comments. 4 AooealoftheDenialtoRemoveaProtectedYewTrce@.2111EastonDrive-(Contd.)Commissioner Ellis stated that she would like to hear comments from the City Arborist before rendering a decision. Commissianer Lauder agreed and. moved thot this item be carried over to the February 2002 Commissian meeting when the City Arborist could. speak to this iteml seconded Mofion conied 5 - 0 - 2 (absefi). Chairperson Locke advised the apptcants that there would be no action on ttreir item tonight but would be continued at the February f Commission meeting when the City Arborist could be available. Tree Plantins on Old Bavshore Boulevard - Status Reoort - Commissioner McGowan stated that Superintendent Richmond, CommissionerHesselgreq and he met with City Planner Monroe and Planning Commissioner Bojues to discuss tree planting on Old Bayshore Boulevard, North of Broadway. Ci6, Planner Monroe indicated to the group that the Pluuring Commission had made some changes in its direction and felt the Beautification Commission should hire a consultant to assist them with some design lines. CommissionerMcGowan statedthathe andCommissionerHesselgren believethe City Council andttre Crty Manager would like to see some beautification of the area; the idea was brought up by a Councilperson at the Joint Beautification Commission/Council meeting. Commissioner McGowan stated that with his experience in landscape design, that on his own time, he would be willing to create a schematic for tree planting in that area. If approved by the Commission, it could then be proposed to the City Council. The Commission discussed possible future changes in the area and speculation of a potential master plan for the area that might affect newly planted trees. Superintendent Richmond stated that there are many variables that exist in the arga and the Beautification Commission will need to be moving in the same general direction set by the Planning Commission. Commissioner McGowan stated that there are about 64 existing planting sites in the area, that changes are not likely to happen any time soon, and since the City Manager and Council have expressed some interesq it would be worth pursuing. Chairperson Locke added that by providing a schematic of tree planting of the area it could generate more interest, but it would be important that the plan not be at cross purposJs with the Planning Commission's vision of the area- Superintendent Richmond stated that he would also ask the Director of public Works what he believes the future plans are for the area- Superintendent Richmond suggested that any general concept ideas Commissioners may have for the area be presented to Commissioner McGowan. REPORTS - Richmond -l) Recommel{ed that the Commission consider canceling the January 3'd Commission meeting. 2) Requested that the appeal process for private tree removals and how it applies to the Urban- Reforestation ordinance be placed on the next agenda. 3) The Fall tree planting has been completed and the deadline for tree selection for the March 2OOZ \zrilll be at the end of December. a) The tree crew are currently rimming Sycamores in the eastside section of Burlingame Avenue from Palm Avenue. The tree crew is also keeping to their goal of trimming every tree in the City at least every 4 years. 5) Theretras been some negative reacfion to the raising ofthe City trees over the streets as required by the vehicle code as referenced in the city Attomey's memo dated l2l30l9g. 5 REPORTS - Richmond - (Contd.) 6) Eight small to medium sized trees were lost in the recent storm. 7) The City's tree lighting ceremony will be on Decemb er T at4:30 p.m.; school choirs will be performing. 8) Superintendent Richmond welcomed Commissioner Camey and appreciated her willingness and interest to address 2 appeals at her first meeting. SuperintendentRichmond concludedthathe enjoys drilring along CaliforniaDrive and seeing howwell the trees look being planted along that corridor; that it was a good project recommended by Commissioner McGowan. Lauder - Commissioner Lauder welcomed and thanked Commissioner Camey forjoining the Commission. Carnev- Commissioner Camey commented that she found the first meeting to be very interesting, that she will be learning a lot, and will have lots of questions. There being no further business, Chairperson Locke adjoumed the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Resp ectfi.rlly submitted, Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary 6 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD cALtFORN|A 94010-3997 TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, December 13, 2001 Commissioners Present: Lisa De Angelis, Chair Jim Mclver, Vice Chair Russ Cohen David Mayer Commissioners Absent: Jim Evans StaffPresent: Staff Absent: Visitors: Frank Erbacher, Assistant Director of Public Works Homayoun Barekat, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works Keith Tamura, Traffrc Officer, Police Department Keith Marshall, Fire Marshal, Fire Department Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Department Jennifer Pfafq 615 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, Burlingame TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday , December'13,2001 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair De Angelis. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners were present. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.1 ACTION ITEMS. 4.1.1 Election of New chair and New vice chair for year 2ffi2 It was moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/DeAngelis) to elect Vice Chair Mclver to Chair andComm. Evans to Vice Chair for 2002. Unanimously approved by the Commission. 4.1.2 Minutes for November 8, 2001, were submitted and approved. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 Request for Red Zone at 1225 Oak Grove Avenue (No area noticing) Mr. Barekat advised that he did further studies at this location but could not identiff a significantproblem. Extending the red zone would restrict parking availability further. Mr. Erbacher advised that this driveway is not much different than other driveways in the area. Comm. Cohenvisited the site and sees this site has an advantage since it is next io another driveway. Comm.Mayer visited the site and recommends a red zone for two full car spaces. Chair DeAnielis askedif height of parked vehicles is the problem. Mr. Erbacher advised that, no, those &iting thisdriveway actually have the advantage of one driveway plus two parking spaces, another drivewayand a red zone which provides a good window to see oncoming iraffic. It was moved andseconded (Comms. Cohen/Mclver) to move this to an Action Item immediately; it was thenmoved and seconded (Comms. Cohen/Mclver) to deny this request as recommended by staff.Motion was approved by the Commission with the foilowiog ,otr, 3 Ayes, 1 Nay (Mayer), 1 Absent. 4.2.2 Request for Red Zone on north side of Poppy Drive, east of Adeline Drive There was an original request was for a blue handicapped zone at252Opoppy Drive; however, since their neighbor on Adeline Drive also requested a blue zone, staff suggisted one red zonefor their mutual use since they won't ue parting their cars, just unloading passengers. Mr.Erbacher advised that a white zone could be placed for passenger loading orrry. Co-.. Cohensuggested trying a white zone as a first step to respond to their needs then placing the blue zone.officer Tamura advised that if the zone is red and the police receive a report thaia car is parkedthere, they are obliged to issue a ciktion. Staff recommended one whiie zone placed berween The City of Buflingame Page 2 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, December 13 ,2001 residences. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Cohen) to move this to an Action Item immediately; it was then moved and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Mclver) to accept staffs recommendation for one white zone for both parties to have access to passenger unloading. Unanimously approved by the Commission. 4.2.3 Residential Traffic Calming Program Study - Proposed Study Outline Mr- Barekat advised that he has incorporated all comments from the last meeting and included legal issues and property value issues. He also provided a video of trafhc calming devices. He asked for comments and stated he will have more forms, e.g., the ballot "rO ttr" petition, available at the next meeting. The Fire Marshal advised he will interface with Redwood City for their input. The main concern is the wear and tear on their g400,000 fire apparatus going over humps or slowing down to avoid vehicle damage. Mr. Erbacher advised that we will ieview the outline in January and proceed to Council in February so that, if approved, money can then be set aside in the budget for traffic calming requests. Comments included using bullets to avoid inadvertent prioritizing of measures; using italics and asterisks for emphasis. The petition and guidelines for speed humps will be aOOiO for next month's meeting. AIso, a flow chart will be added showing the steps to be followed. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS 5'l Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to determine whether traffic-calming measures are warranted Selective Enforcemenl status prepared by Sgt. Cutler showed results from November. Nineteen traffic stops were made on Howard and 9 on Bayswater during peak traffrc hours. 5.2 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail) 5.3 3138 Rivera - Speed and Signage (e-mail) 5.4 1300 Block of vancouver Avenue - speed concems (petition) 5-5 2415 Adeline Drive - Letter regarding Traffrc Concerns related to Sisters of Mercy Locale From the floor, the petitioner explained the traffic safety concerns for her area with the Sisters of Mercy having more events causing more traffic and diverting "main gate" traffic to the service road. Weekendtraffic is heavy, too, due to retreats, weddings and other events at the site. Also, the new parking lot atMercy has not reduced on-street parking. Delivery trucks have hit cars parked in the *"* th"1,"u.,nytraffic impedes normal residential traffic on Adeline. The City of Budingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, December 13 ,2001 Mr. Erbacher advised the required parking is set by Planning and is addressed in the City's response to her letter. There used to be a centerline on Adeline Drive but has wom off and can be replaced. The volume of traffic cannot be changed by the City. The main gate is controlled by Mercy. The City can do a radar study. Speed will be studied along with volume. The data will be gathered in January and will be available in February. A work order will be issued to replace the centerline with dots added. 6. FROM THEFLOOR 6.1 A resident asked about a signal for the crosswalk on California Drive at Stack's Restaurant. She spoke to the Traffic Engineer two years ago about it and was told there was no money available and perhaps the following year a signal would be budgeted. tvft. Erbacher advised this is on a "wish list,, at this time. The signals for California Drive at Carmelita Avenue and Morrell Avenue will be going in soon. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS 7.1 From Staff to Commission 7 .1.2 Traffic Engineer's Report Mr. Barekat advised that the project installing traffic signals for Carmelita and Morrell will be going out to bid soon. 7.1.3 StaffAction Log Submitted with updates. 7.2 From Commission to Staff 7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests Comm. Cohen received a citizenrequest as to why the new parking meters in downtown lots take only quarters. Mr. Barekat explained that for box capacity and collection purposes, quarters are best. 7.2.2 Comments and communication Comm. Cohen advised that pursuant to the City Engineer's study for a new downtown parking lot which includes making distant lots free, he has put together a preliminary report or, ,igrug"lhut could work in downtown Burlingame which includes examples from across the United States. He stated that good signage and public education is the cornerstone of a successful campaign to encourage employees to park in the free lots. The City of Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, December 13, 2OO1 7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, January 10,2002 meeting - None. 8. INACTIVE ITEMS. 8.1 Request for traffic control on Dwight Road Mr. Erbacher advised he is in the process of looking at the plans. 8.2 Millbrae BART Station - Potential Impacts on City streets 8.3 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOP sign on Trousdale at Quesada Way. Results of TrafficDataGathering - Speed limits Officer Tamura stated that the speed appears to be coming down. He provided Sgt. Cutler's Selective Enforcemer, results for November which showed I 6 citations issued, slightly down from I 9 last month. Also, 13 verbal warnings were issued. 9. AGENDIZE FOR TTIE NEXT MEETING 2415 Adeline Drive request to Acknowledgments -Datagathering in January 10. ADJOURNMENT. 9:30 p.m. The City of Burlingame Page 5 -] BUflLINGAME ?UBLIC LIEfiARY Burlingame Public Library Board of Trustees Minutes November 13, 2OOl Call to Order The meeting of November 13, 2OOl was called to order by President, Mar5r Herman, at 4:30 pm. Roll Call Trustees Present:Cecile Coar, Jane Dunbar, Andrew Gurthet, and Mary Herman Catherine McCormack Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder I Trustees Absent Staff Present: IV V III Hrimrose Roodogurlingome.CA (6 50 | 342 - I 03 8. Fox (6 5 0l 3 42- 19 48. www. p ls.lib Warrants and Special Funds Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants as presented. M/S/C (Gurthet/Coar) Minutes The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the minutes of the October 16, 2OO1 meeting. M/S/C (Coar/Gurthet) Correspondence Correspondence mailed in the packets was reviewed.A. Library of vietnam Leaflet - The Trustees felt that they needed to obtain more detailed information about the entity known as "Glob'al community Service Projects". The Trustees were interested in finding out whether there is any precedent of libraries having a sister library prograrn. The city Librarian noted that ALA has a sister library program and offered to include information onthis subject in the December board packet. The Trustees agreed to request that Mr. constantino attend the January ls,2oo2 meeting instead of the December 11th meeting. 480 Phone 94010 40 83 c.o . u s / p I s / p I s . h t m I II. VII. B. PROutline: Years 1999, 2OOl and2OO2-LindaSanto used this outline for her presentation to the City Council detailing adult programming made available to the public including exhibits and winning awards. VI. From the Floor Members of the public did not attend. Reports A. City Librarian's Report - A1 Escoffier, The City Librarian reviewed his report highlighting the following issues.1. Easton Branch Renovation Project - At the City Council meeting held on October 166, the Council agreed to support Option #2 as it best serves the needs of the public and meets the financial constraints of the project. This option includes completely renovating the interior with the foilowing upgrades: HVAC, mechanical, electrical, seismic and handicapped accessibility. The Marshall Trust will be the main source of funding. The tentative timetable is to hold public workshops and complete design work in 2OO2 with construction beginning in 2003. On December 13th a meeting will be held to begin the planning process for the next phase of the project. 2. Easton Branch Staffing a. Lisa Dunseth resigned as the Branch Librarian effective on November 2.d. Lisa has accepted a position at San Francisco Public Library. b. Staffing for the Branch will be reorganized. An in-house recruitment for a Librarian III position will begin soon with a cut off date of November 9th. The person who is appointed to this position will oversee special projects of which the Branch will be one.c. Amy Gettle, Circulation Supervisor, is overseeing the transition period at the Branch. 3. California Library Assoclation Awards - The Library received two awards from the California Library Association: one for the Foundation Newsletter and one for Adult Programming. Linda Santo, Maryam Refahi, Jan Eustis and Sue Reiterman comprise the PR Committee.B. Foundation Report - Dunbar/Herman1. Nominatlng Committee - The nominating committee is accepting nominations for new board members who will be presented at the January meeting, as well as the oflicers for the coming year. Library Board of Trustee Minutes November 13. 2001 2 VIII. Unfinished Business A. Employee Achievement Awards - Mary Herman, Cecile Coar and Andrew Gurthet will present the Employee Achievement Awards for the year 2001. B. Employee Recognition Dinner - Invitations were sent out the first of November and responses are requested by December 3td. C. Holiday Tree Lighting - A holiday program will be held at City Hall on December 7th after which the traditional tree lighting will take place. The Library will host its Holiday program at 5:30pm. IX. New Business - A. The Trustees approved a motion to fund Lisa Dunseth's going away party in the amount of $200.00. M/SlC (Coar/ Gurthet) X. Announcements -A. Patron Davld Jonson - Trustee Herman advised the trustees that she had received an e-mail from Mr. David Jonson inquiring as to whether the Library Trustees had made any further changes to the Holiday Schedule for the year 2002. Trustee Herman replied to Mr. Jonson by e-mail that no further changes were made. B. Employee Achievement Award Dinner - The trustees agreed to invite past trustees Jeff Berger and Mary Lou Morton to this event. C. New Council Member - The City Librarian advised the Trustees that he would be inviting newly elected Council member Cathy Baylock to the Library for an orientation session. XI Adiournment - The meeting was adjoumed at 5:15pm. M/S/C (Gurthet/Herman) The next meeting of the Library Board of Trustees is scheduled for December i 1, 2001 at 4:30pm in the Library Conference Room. Respectfully Submitted Alfre H. Esc Citv Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes November 13, 2001 J CITA OF BARI.INGAME IEIE UOIITE MONTHLY PERMIT ACTMTY NOVEMBER, 2001 SN{A MONTE TETS YEAR BUII.DING INSPECTION I.I,8T YEIR I.}ST UONTE YEAR DATE FISCAIJ YEIR DATEDATE Va1uatloD $6, s50, 917 $2,352.389 $2,010,000 $10,282,6s1 $9 1752 t 445 $1s5, ooo s98,723 $164. 975 $13,100 $2,380,584 $1S8, 59s $248,198 9653,288 PGmiE rlrp. New Slngle Family New t'tult i - Fam1ly Neh' Commerclal Alterat,Lons -Rea Alt,eratsionE-NonReE Demolltlon swimming PooI sign Permit.s Fence6 Rerooflng Repalrs Window RepI MiacelIaneou8 vrlualiotr $3s0,000 $o s5, s00, 000 $788,200 $s57, s00 99,000 122 , Ooo $6,800 $333, s85 $7,600 i4L ,629 $55,100 vcluaEioB $878.552 $o $o $483,638 i4 , 9L6 ,41.s $o $o $5,100 $o $137, s18 $3s, 000 s2X,93s 99,700 Valuatl,ou $4,772,Lso s2{7, 000 $12,98s,000 $11,7{1,1s1 $9,328.200 $ls0, s00 $15{,138 $93,378 $5,700 $2, 513 , 08e $31S,000 s4s4,498 $1.383, s73 VrlurtioD $2, 610, 000 $o s10,100,000 $4, 8s6, 409 $4 , s19, {so $39,000 i22,000 $37 ,325 95,700 9L t 424 ,525 $1s, eoo 1222 ,2Os $sr2 t 429 * 3 0 22 4 I 0 J. 0 5 5 valuaEloB $970,000 $o $o $s99,180 $1,01s,000 $o So 12,7sO $s,700 9119,732 $o $39,800 $18,300 * 15 1 7 254 58 51 11 22 2 224 29 53 * 23 2 263 93 50 I 39 3 231 30 43 52 * t 0 1 15 5 8 3 0 28 4 5 6 * 0 0 22 10 5 0 0 15 4 * I 0 4 L22 27 26 1 72r 7 34 TOTA],S..--..62 12,'.770,462 79 $8,692,4L5 67 $5,488,858 824 944,r57,377 840 934,871,956 388 924,365,943 t2/o"/01, 1a z 26 :49 I lnvestments CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2001 Par Value Market Value Book Value %ot Portiollo Days to Maturlty YTM Term 360 Equlv. YTM 365 Equlv. LAIF & County Pool CORP NOTES Fed€ral Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 14,028,399,95 3,000,000.00 16,000,000.00 14,028,399.95 3,112,500.00 16,363,720.00 14,028,399.95 3,027,780.00 16,000,000.00 42.44 9.16 48.40 1 1,598 1,752 1 607 1,461 3,632 5.92S 5.635 3,063 6.011 5.713 33,028,399.95 33,s04,619.9s 33,056,179.95 100.00% 1,014 763 4.812 4.879 Total Earnlngs November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date Current Year Average Dally Balance Effectlve Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available 135,440.65 32,889,255.14 5.01c/c funds to meet Burllngame's 793,365.35 35,624,414.93 5.31o/o expenditure regulr€ments for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and is restricted by law (e,9. Gas Tax, Trust &Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).r1 ;RAHN A. BECKER,DIR./TREASURER Portfollo CITY CP PM (PRF-PMl ) SymRept V5.02, Run Oate: 1211012001 .12i23 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Detalls . lnvestments November 30, 2001 Purchalo Date Par Valu6 Statod Book Valuc Rate Moody's Page 2 CUSIP lnvortmcnt f lsruer Average Balanco Market Value YTM Dale to 385 Maturlty Maturlty Dato LAIF & County Pool 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. S M COUNTY POOL Subtotal and Average 10,331,916.06 3,6S6,4E3.89 10,331,916.06 3,696,483.6e 10,331,910.06 3,696,4E3.89 3.520 4.120 3.526 4,12079 13,E61,475.14 14,028,399.95 14,028,309.95 14,028,309.95 3.883 'l CORP NOTES 0739028M9 37042R2C5 487 489 BEAR STEARNS CORP GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP Subtotal and Av.rage 03/021999 04t20t1999 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,090,000.00 1,022,500.00 6.150 6.750 6,1 79 5.6E5 822 03t02t2004 151 08t10t2002 3,027,,780.00 3,000,000.00 3,112,500.00 1,997,500.00 1,030,280.00 3,027,780.00 6.011 007 Federal Agency lssues . Coupon 313311KK3 31S3M3TS4 3't33M7Y75 3133M025 3133MF2D9 3I33MFUB2 3133MHJ62 3136F0Y29 499 478 488 494 498 500 504 502 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOEML HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FANNIE MAE Subtotal and Averagc 10,303,720.00 r0,000,000.00 5.800 1,055 6.020 471 6.000 842 6.250 1,530 5.630 1,635 5.250 1,137 5.550 1,7A2 _g 1Ja- 5,713 1,461 04h312001 03/1 7/1 998 0312211995 02108t2001 o512412001 07t1112001 09128t2001 0812812001 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,040,000,00 1,044,000.00 2,115,000.00 2,015,620.00 2.035,000.00 't,003,440.00 2,023,120.00 4,067,480.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5.800 6.020 6.000 6.250 5.030 5.250 5.550 5.420 08/13/2006 03117t2003 03t22t2004 02108t2006 0512412006 01/1 1/2005 o9128t2008 o8l28t2006 18,000,000.00 16,000,000.00 Total lnwrtmcntr and Averagc 32,885,255.14 33,02E,399.05 33,5(N,610.05 33,050,170.05 4.870 763 Portfolio CIW CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.04 Run Data: M0n001 - 12:23 ll 1 1 t CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnvestment Activity By Type November 1,2001through November 30, 2OOl Page 3 CUSIP lnvoatment # bsuer Baglnnlng Balance Stated Rate Tranractlon Datc Purchases or Doposlts SaIGS/Maturltle! or Wlthdrawals Endlng Balance LAIF & County Pool (Monthty Summary) 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.79 SMCOUNTYPOOL 3.52A 4.120 1 't9,948.52 321,636.65 0.00 0.00 Subtotal 13,586,8{4.78 u1,585.17 0.00 14,028,309.S5 CORP NOTES Subtotal 3,027,780.00 3,027,780.00 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon Subtotal 16,000,000.00 {3,000,000.00 Total 32,414,594.78 441,585.17 0.00 33,056,170.95 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRepr V5,02f Run Oate: 12110f2O01 .12:23 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnvestment Actlvity Summary November 2000 through November 2001 Ylold to Maturlty Managcd Page 4 Average Oays to Maturlty Month Number of Securltles Total lnvoltod 360Equlvalent Equlvalent 365 Pool Rato Number of Sacurltlca Purchared Number of Securltla3 Maturcd / Sold Averago TermEndYear November December January February March Aprll May June July August Septomber October November 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 200,1 2001 2001 2001 18 18 17 17 't5 34,303,01 1.62 36,671,750.34 35,405,206.28 35,707,733.22 34,010,264.54 37,255,372.54 38,758,088.2s 36,085,177.06 38,447,819,42 38,002,167.12 34,930,381.22 32,614,594.78 33,056,179.95 6.185 6.165 6.084 5.994 5.963 5.737 s.609 5.431 5.396 5,287 5.3s2 4.880 4.812 6.271 6.251 6.169 6.077 6.046 5.817 5.687 5.507 5.471 5.361 5.426 4.948 4.879 6.380 6.311 6.130 5,979 5.869 5.417 5.200 4.767 4.632 4,4U 4.2',t4 3.809 3.683 0 0 ,| 3 2 2 1 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 I 2 1 1 0 0 1,127 1,054 1,041 1,0s3 998 931 948 989 1,047 1,089 1,289 1,028 1,014 660 599 591 727 688 671 695 7U 817 860 1,020 791 763 14 14 13 15 14 15 12 12 Avorage 15 35,788,288.18 5.6070/o 5.6S5% 5.14 11 1,047 742 Portfollo CITY CP PM (PRF_PMa) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 1211012001 -'12123 tI CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Distributlon of lnvestments By Type November 2000 through November 2001 August S€ptGmbor 2001 2001 October November 2001 2001 Page 5 Average by Parlod lnvestment Type LAIF & County Pool November Deccmbcr2000 2000 FebruaryJanuary 20012001 March 200{ Aprll 2001 May 2001 June July 20012001 34.5 38.7 39.3 34.3 36.9 Certlflcates of Deposit - Bank 42.4 41.9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 38,0% Gertiflcates of Deposlt. S & L Gertlflcates of Deposlt.Thrlft & Ln Negotlable CD's . Bank CORP NOTES 8.8 8.3 8.6 8.5 7,8 8.4 8.08.9 8.1 7,9 8.7 9.3 9,2 8.50/oBankers Acceptances Gommerclal Paper - lntorest Bearlng Gommercial - Dlscount Federal Agency lssues .Coupon 56.7 53.1 52.1 57.3 54,2 49,5 50.3 51.3 55.9 53.9 il.4 49.'l 53.670Federal Agency lssues . Olscount Securltles - Coupon Treasury Securltles - Dlscount Mlscellaneous Securlties .Coupon Mlscellaneous Securltles . Dlscount Non lnterest Bearlng lnvestmontS Backed Securitles Mlscellaneouc Dlscounts -At Cost 2 Mlscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PMs) SymRept v5.o2f Run Oate: 1A102:001 .12:23 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnterest Earnlngs Summary November 30,2001 Novomb€r 30 Month Endlng Flscal Yoar To Dato Page 6 CD/Coupon/Dlscount lnvostm€nt5: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnter$t at End of P€rlod Less Accrued lnter€st at Beglnnlng of Perlod Lsss Accrued lnt6r$t at Purchase During P8riod lnier6st Eamed duiing Perlod AdJusted by Capltal Galns or Losses Eamings during Period 56,300.00 268,439.99 232,690.00) 0.00) 620,900.00 268,439.99 337,083.33) 0.00) 92,049.99 0.00 ss2,256.66 1,250.00 92,049.99 553.506.66 Pa$ Through Securltles: lntorsst Collocted Plus Accrued lnter€st at End of Poriod Less Accru€d lnterost at Beglnnlng of P€riod Less Accrued lntsrest al Purchas€ Oudng Pedod Interost Eamsd during Period Adjusted by Pr€mlums and Dls@unts Adjusted by Capital Galns or Loases Eamings during Perlod 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash/Ghecklng Accounlg: lntorest Collscted Plus Acqu€d lnterest at End of Perlod Less Accrued lnterest at Beglnnlng of Perlod lnterest Eamed during Poriod 119,948.52 308,016.78 384,s74.64) 357,562.02 308,0'16.78 425,720.11) 43,390,66 239,858.69 Total lnter.st Earned durlng Perlod Total Capltal Galns or Losses 135,440.65 0.00 792,115.35 1,250.00 Total Earnlngs durlng Perlod 135,440.65 793,365.35 Run Orl€: 1211012001 .12:23 Portfollo CITY CP PM (PRF-PM6) stlnR3pt v5.021 ( ( ( ( ( ( 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2001 lnvestments Federal Agency lssues. Coupon lnvestments Total Earnlngs November 30 Month Par Value 800,000.00 Markot Valuc E02,000.00 '/t ol Po16ollo 100.00 100.00% Book Value Term 1,756 1,756 Dayr to Maturlty 653 653 YTM 360 Equlv. 4.995 4.995 YTM 385 Equlv. 5.064 s.064 825,752.OO 800,000.00 829,752,00 802,000.00 Endlng Flscal Year To Date Cunent Year 3,416.67 17,063.34 Average Oally Balance 802,000.00 802,000.00 Effecilve Rate of Return 3,18%5.08% Pursuant to State law, there are sufflcient avallable funds to meet Burlingame,s expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months, Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, andls restricted by law (e.9. Gas Capltal Projects, and Enterprlse funds). Rahn Becker,, Finance Director/Treasurer Tax, Trust & Agency funds, ///r/, Portfotio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PMl) SyrnRepr V5.O2f Run Oate: 12110n001 . 12.23 custP lnvaatmantt lBauer Aver.ge Balanc6 Purch.3a D|l.MrrkgtValue 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments November 30,2001 Page 2 Stat d Bookvalu. RaL YTM Day3 to 385 Maturlty Maturlty Data LAIF 79 LOCALAGENCY INV, FO 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.707 Subtotal and Avaraga 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.000 0 F€d€r8l Agency lssu€s - Coupon 31331\i5QB9 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal and Avoraoa 802,000.00 5.125 5.084 653 09/15/2003 5.064 05:i '11t24h954 629,752.00 802,000.00 800,000.00 820,7s2.00 802,000.00 802,000.00 800,000.00 029,752.00 802,000.00 5.064 653 Run OBt€: 121ol2001 - 12:23 Portfollo 95BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymR.pl V5.02r 800,000.00 Total lnvaatn.nL d AvaraCc 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2001 lnvestments Federal Agency Coupon Securities lnvestments Total Earnlngs Par Valuo Market Value Book Valus t/c ol Portfollo Term 1,826 Da!,s to iilaturlty 480 480 YTM 360 Equlv, 5.977 5.977 YTM 385 Equlv. 6.060 6.060 1,7 t0,000.00 1,787,480.10 1,710,000.00 100.00 1,710,000.00 1,787,480,10 1,710,000.00 100.00% 1,926 November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date Cunent Year Average Dally Balance Effectlve Rate of Retum Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available 8,587.79 43,391,68 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 6.11c/c 6.05% funds to meet Budingame,s expenditure requlrements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, andrestricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds,Capital Projects, and Enterprlse tunds).4,RAHN BECKER, Finance Dlrector/Treasurer Portfolio 98BD OP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.O2t Run Date: 12n0n0u .,t2:24 CUSIP lnve3tment # l$uer Av.rage Balance 98BD Portfolio Management Portfollo Detalls - lnvestments November 30,2001 Purchasc Oat Par Value Stated Book Value Rale Moody'rMark6t valuc YTM Dayt to 365 Maturlty Page2 Maturlty Date Managed Pool Accounts 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.'t2480LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUNO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0Subtotal and Avcrage Federal Agency Goupon Securltles 3'|33M3XE0 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1 ,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 4E0 03/26/2003 8.060 rl80 03/26119S8 1,710,000.00 1,787,400.10 Subtotsl and Average t,710,000.00 1,7t0p00.00 1,787,480.10 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,787'll80.10 1,710,000.00 0.060 /t80 Total lnvestmentr and Average 1,710,000.00 Portfollo 98BD CP PM (PRF-PM2) SymRopt V5.02tRun Oate: lAlOnOo1 .12124 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2OOl lnvestments Par Valuo Markot Value Book Valuo 'h ol Portfollo Dayr to MaturltyTerm YTM 380 Equlv. YTM 365 Equlv.Managed Pool Accounts Federal Agency Coupon Securifles lnvostmsnts 12,580,34S.52 1,'r00,000.00 12,580,349,52 1j25,432.00 12,580,U9.52 1,100,000.00 1 1,826 148 91.00 8.04 1 1,7't8 139 3.478 5.474 3.638 3.526 5.550 3.689 13,590,349.52 13,705,791.52 13,680,349.52 100.00% Total Eamlngs November 30 Month Endlng Flscal Year To Date Current Year Average Dally Balance Effectlve Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, there are sufflcient available 42,899.67 13,751,918.{9 3,80./c funds to meet Burlingame's 189,0't1.59 & Agency funds, Capltal preects, and Enterprise funds). expenditure requlrements for the coming 6 months. Total funds lnvested represent consolidation of some of these funds ls /L/rr/, Rahn A.Eecker, Finance Dir./Treasurer Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PMr) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 1211012001 - 12124 Avorag6 Balanc6 O1 BD Portfolio Management Portfollo Detalls - lnvestments November 30,2001 Purchare Dato Par Value Market Value Stated BookValuc Rate YTM YTM DaFIo 365 Maturlty Page2 Maturlty DatoCUSIPlnve3tment # lgluer 360 Manag€d Pool Accountg 81 Local Agency lnv. Fd 08/09/2001 12,580,349.s2 12,580,Us.52 12,580,349.52 3.526 3.416 3.526 t.478 3.526 1Subtotal and Average 12,051,8{6.{9 {2,580,340.52 12,580,:r49.52 {2,580,349.52 Federal Agency Goupon Securltles 3133MGQR0 503 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Avcrage 08/1 5/2001 1,'100,000.00 1,125,432.00 1,1oO,OOO.00 5.550 5,474 5.550 1,718 08/15/2006 I,100,000.00 5.47a 5.550 1,7181,100,000.00 I,100,000.00 1,125,43r2.OO Total lnvcrtments and Average 13,75't,816.19 13,680,349.52 13J05,7E1.52 13,6E0,340.52 3.638 3.6E9 130 Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 1211012001 - 12i24 L2-L4-0a SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES FOR: NOVEMBER, 200L Last CurrenL Year..Crime Classification Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter Manslaughter by Negligence Rape By Force Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape Robbery Firearm Robbery Knife Robbery Other Dangrerous Weapon Robbery Strong-Arm Assault - Firearm Assault - Knlfe Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon Assault - Hands, Fists, Feet Assault - other (Simple) Burglary - Forcible Entry Burglary - Unlawful Entry Burglary - Attempted Forcibl-e EntryLarceny Pocket-Picking Larceny Purse-Snatching Larceny Shoplifting Larceny From Motor Vehicle Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories Larceny Bicycles Larceny From Building Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine Larceny AIl Other Motor Vehicle Theft AuLo Motor Vehicle Theft Bus Motor Vehicle Theft Other PAGE: 1 Act YTD. Prev Act YTD. 0 Z 0 0 7 1 2 1 6 10 1 6 0 0 10 1 7 Z 3 1,2 aZ 4 L6 5 1 1 1 15 6 9 1 1 0 6 1B 9 4 193 L22 65 7 4 5 33 LZ+ 40 30 311 L2 64 Lt6 az z t6 '7 L96 58 6B 5 5 7 3B L2B 61, 2L 238 13 40 9L 15 5 1 10 6 9 3 1 33 13 L2 Q1 75 7,192 1,046 87 75 1_,l.92 1,046 12-L4-0L MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITY REPORT FOR: PART TWO OFFENSES NOVEMBER, 2OOI PAGE: 1 Last Current Year 32 aZ aZ Act YTD 38 489 1) 15 3 5 55 38 11 94 35 1 6B 2t 0 0 0 .) 0 23 91 18 0 6T 5Z ..7 1 32 97 5Z 181 4B aZ 5 Prev Act YTD.Crime Classification. All Other Offenses Animal Abuse Animal Nuisance Arson Assists to Outside Agencies Bicycle Violations Bigamy Bomb Offense Bomb Threat Bribery Check Offenses ChiId Neglect/prot custody Computer Crime Conspiracy Credit Card Offenses Cruelty to Dependent Adult Curfew and Loitering Laws Death Investigat.ion Disorderly Conduct Driver' s License Violations Driving Under the Influence Drug Abuse Violations Drug/Sex Registrants Drunkeness Embezzlement Escape Extort ion False Pol-ice Reports False Reports of Emergency Fish and Game Viol-ations Forgery and Counterfeiting Found Property Fraud Gambl ing Harrassing Phone Ca1ls Hit and Run Accidents Impersonation Incest Indecent Exposure Intimidating a Witness Kidnapping Lewd Conduct Liquor Laws Littering/Dumping Mari j uana Violat.ions Mental Healt.h CasesMissing Person Missing Property Municipal Code Violat.ions Narcotics Sales/Manufacture Offenses Against Chil_dren 464 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 1 0 75 0 z 4 3 3 az 0 1-4 0 0 0 1 3 0 t4 0 1 4 0 10 0 0 U 10 n t-5 30 1 1 '7 T7 5 5 2 3 t, 1 4 Z 1 4 3 2 13 3 6 2 15 aZ 3 9 5 3 37 0 63 11 0 0 0 0 0 2L 90 0 B4 4B 1 0 11 0 0 3 5 .> 2 44 79 33 107 55 1 13 L2-14-0L Crime Classification Other Assaults Other Juvenile Offenses Other Police Service Pandering for j-mmoral purposes Parole Vi-olations Perj ury Possession of Burglary TooIs Possession of drug paraphernalia Possession of obscene literature;picture Probation Violations Prostitution and Commercial Vice Prowling Resi-sting Arrest Runaways (Under 18) Sex Offenses Sex Offenses against Children Sodomy Stalking Statutory Rape StoIen Propert.y; Buying; Receiving; Possess Suspended Lj-cense Tax Evasion Temp Restraining Orders Terrorist Threats 'I'owed Vefrrc-Le Trespass j-ng Truant s f Incorrigible Juvs US MaiI Crimes Vagrancy Vandal ism Vehicle Code Violations Violation of Court. Order Warrants - Felony Warrants - Misd Weapons ; Carrying, Possessing Welfare Fraud MONTHLY SUIVIMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2001 PAGE: 2 Last Current Year. 1B 15 6 z 1 Z 18 Act YTD Prev Aal- YTD. 1 L96 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 1 54 0 56 0 193 1 150 U Z U 0 U 0 24 2 4 3 0 6 6 U z 0 5 52 0 1 2 2 1 49 5 3 51 1 1 2 1 2 1 20 1 3) 4 Z 57 33 567 7 7 0 0 225 45 2L B 59 15 0 402 L6 1 0 0 27'7 13 21, 10 56 9 0 242 2a9 3,031 2,569 242 2L9 3,037 2,569 12 -T4 - 0L Crime Classification Parking Citations Moving Citations MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 200L Last Current Year PAGE: 1 2 ,595 1,32 2 ,825 L97 Anl YTD 30 ,456 2 ,224 Prev Act YTD. 32,448 2 ,641_ 2,727 3,022 32,680 35,089 2,727 3 ,022 32,680 35, 089 rl Officer Productivity. . . . Reported On: A11 Officers Data Type Reported on: PARKING Officer:ID: valid Cnt BURLINGAME generated on 12/74/2001 at 10:01:48 AM Report Range: 11 /0L/2007 to 7t/30/200L * AI1 Valid Voids Cnt t All voidg valid t DAZA-QUIROZ GARRETT JFOX KTRKPATRICK MORAN ROSCOE 634 501 505 502 20L 503 567 434 282 49 113 6 74 22.31 L7.01 1,1.09 1,.93 44 .69 )q1 21.88 43.15 L2.50 3.13 18 .75 0.00 7 t4 4 1 6 0 98.78 96.88 98.60 98.00 99 .47 100.00 total 2542 32 Page 1 of 1 The City of Burlingame PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT Td:(65O1 558-7230 Fax(66O1 685-9310 CITY HAI.I - 5OT PRIMROSE ROAO BURTINGAME, CALTFORNIA 9401 G3997 CORPORATION YARO Tel:(65O1 558-7670 DearMs. Macdonald; Thank you for your letter and concern. This intersection has been rwiewed periodically for many years. A request for firnding intersection improvementsis in the current Five Year Capital Improvement plan bui not yet funded. your suggestion of a lighted crosswalksimilar to one installed by the city of san Mateo is a very gold oo. for noticing the motorists of crosswalk use.It is one ofthe strong options that has had stafflevet s"pplort and that will beieviewed when seeking fundingapproval. The Police Department reviewed the partrgular accident you wrote of, A number violations by the bike rider mayhave been the cause of this accident- The Police Deparrnent also reviewed the accident history. Both motoristsand pedestrian appear to be handling the intersection well as this remains a low accident rate intersection. Again thank you for the letter of concern. Please feel free to contact either myself or the City Engineer, SyedMurfuz4 at the number above if you have any further questions. December 28,20[1 Mary Macdonald 342Elm Street San lvlateo,CA9440l 342-2312 Re: Your Letter of December 16,2001 Pedestian Crosswalk at California Drive and Lorton Ave. C. Erbacher Assistant Director Ofpubtic Works c- City Clerk; City Manager; City Attorney; City Engineer S:\A Public works Dircctory\Author, By Name\Frank Erbacher Lrtters\macdonard.rtr.wpd .{,city council pcity Manager \City Attomey il Dir. Finance respond lJ No Response Required December 16,2001 City Council City ofBurlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 n City Planner 5(Dir. Public works I Human Resources - Police Chief tl Fire Chief Parks & Rec !l Librarian {on Next Agenda PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK Dangerous Pedestrian Crosswalk California Drive near Irrton Dear Council Members: I am not sure that you are the Body to whom I should address a concern regarding a pedestrian crosswalk which is extremely dangerous in Burlingame. If I have addressed the wrong group with my request, I ask that you will forward my letter to the appropriate individual(s) for consideration and attention. I would appreciate a reply to this letter. I commute from the Burlingame Train Station to San Francisco by Calfiain weekdays. I park my car in the commuter lot next to Royal Donut. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen individuals attempt to use the cross walk on busy California drive who either almost get hit, bring traffrc to a screeching halt, or have to wait a long time to cross the street because auto drivers are so self-absorbed that they don't even notice a pedestrian tying to cross the street. Additionally, it is dark in the winter months by 5:30-6 p.m. during the evening commute. Last week @ecember l0th), I witnessed on my evening return from San Francisco via the train that a car had hit a man who was riding a bike across this crosswalk. Another commuter who also witnessed this accident had a cell phone and catled 9-l-1. The police, fire engine and paramedics responded immediately. The cross-walk in question is on California Drive (across the sfieet from Stack's Restaurant). There is also a SamTrans bus stop and bench very near to the crosswalk as well. (You could check with the police officers who handled the accident report for December l0th at approximately 6 p.m. for specifics if I am not giving you enough information as to the location of the crosswalk). Something really needs to be done to make this cross-walk safe for pedestrians (as well as for traveling motorists). I recommend that blinking light strips be installed (similar to the ones that have been installed on Fourth Avenue in San Mateo just down the street from Strouds at El Camino and near to Pasta Primavera also on Fourth Avenue. I believe that installation of such blinking pedestrian light strips would alert drivers that there is a pedestrian cross walk present and just might save someone's life. As I mentioned, I commute every day and witness the difficulty that pedestrians have at this crosswalk. I hope you can immediately address this request and implement a solution. Thank you for your attention and happy holidays. Sincerely, Mary Macdonald 342 Elm Street San Mateo, CA94401 650 342 2312 cc:Burlingame Police Departrnent Burlingame City Attorney's Office Burlingame City Manager's Office MopQuelt: Driving Directions ! **.ri ,irucrJ Ialn S Set rsqHfrTRIX FRf;fr on DvD FR€€ Shtpplng & Hondtlng Tlll iis *fer'r YEU.OW PSGESNOAD TTIP PTANNTA*1APS driving directions ' North America . Europe . Saved Routes City Guide . San Francisco Dinino . San Francisco News r San Francisco Movies . San Francisco Entertainment Yellow Pages Search Burlingame for FROM: 2OO California Dr Burlingame, CA 94010 US Total Distance: 0.15 miles TO: 361 California Dr Burlingame, CA 94010 US Total Estimated Time: 1 minute DISTANCE 0.15 miles Tota! Distance: O.15 mlles HELP ? AIM AIM E-mail EOU?t DIRECTIONS 1: Start out going Northwest on CAUFORNIA DR towards SOUTH LN by turning right. Total Estimated Time: 1 minute Need help finding a local business? Trv our Yellow Paoes! ROUTE OVERVIEW: fl,ffitfl,*Eot*ftiAp*nu @ Zoom In 0 Re-center All riohts reserved. Use Subiect to License/Coovrioht IOOti li{ EI -J J J J J J J J J rd zoa*r ouT Auto r L ? Search DESTINATION: Map Leoend ffi Page I of 2 Home I HeIp ,,':: hrylturvwnaqE*ccr*frEdirutuins+?gFl@tp&tc*dingilb&ls{A&la340l0&lyf_6de#kffcnir+Dir,e&&ac+dinsme-.