HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.02.201
BURLINGAME CITY COI]NCIL AGENDA
RscrrLAR Mnernrc - WnounsoAy, Fennu *y 20,2002
Pecr 1 or 3
STIJDY SESSION
New Voicemail System
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL
MINUTES - Special Meeting of January 30,2002, Goal Session
Meeting of February 2,2002 and Regular Meeting of February 4,
2002
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS Themayormaylimitspeaken tothreeminateseach
2.
a
4.
a New
Montes
a. Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision on Design
Review and a Hillside Area Construction Permit fbr
Two-Story Single Family House at 1509 Los
Avenue, Zoned R-l
b. Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning from Single Family Residential
(R-1) to Duplex Residential (R-2) for Eight
Properties with Request Modifying
Application to Two Properties, 1224 and
122611228 Paloma Avenue, Following Planning
Commission Denial of Rezoning Request for Properties on
Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues
c. Review of Planning Commission's Denial of the Request
for a variance for a free standing sign at the
Methodist Church, 1443United
Howard Avenue, Zoned R-3/C-1, Subarea B,
Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area
d. Appeal of the Pianning Commission's Denial without
Prejudice on an Application for a Conditional
Use Permit to Convert the Service Bays of an
Existing Gas Station to a Mini-Mart al ll47
Rollins Road, Zoned C-1
City of Bwlingame
CITY HALL. 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94OIO
(6so) 55&720o
SUGGESTED ACTTON
6:30 p.m., Conference Room A
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Approval
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rscur,en Msnrn'rc - WnowrspAy, FEnRUenv 20, 2002
Pecr I or3
e. Adopt Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.08 to Adopt by
Reference Certain Provisions of Titles 4 and 5
of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code and
Conforming Backflow Protection for Fire
Protection Systems
f. Adopt Ordinance Amending Title 13 to Clarify and
Affirm Parking Regulations with Regard to Street
and Public Off- Street Parking
6, PUBLIC COMMENTS - At thls time, persons in the audience may speak on any
item on the agenda or any other matter within the junsdiction of the Council. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from
acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer
such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a
"request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The
Mayor may limrt speakers to thlee minutes each.
STAFF REPORTS AND COMMLINICATIONS
a. Introduce Ordinance to Amend Regulations Affecting Leaf
Blower Operation
b. Introduce Ordinance to Amend Chapter 9.04 to Provide a
Year License for Dogs and to Update License and
Schedule for Animal Control
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Resolution to Support State Legislation to fix the Bay Area
Regional Water System and Protect our Residents from
Catastrophic Water Outages
nI
b. Resoiution Authorizing Agreement Amendment No. 2,
SCADA Master Plan and Contract Preparation
Cybemet Consulting - CP 9940
c. Authorize City Attorney to Join in Amrcus Curiae Brief in
Oak Creek Estates vs. Town of Paradise, Case Nos.
C038571 &. C039424 at No Cost to City
with
d, Warants & Payroil, Ianuary 2002 Approval
City of Bwlingame
CIfi HALL. 50I PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 9,IO1O
(650) 55&7200
HearingAction
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Introduce
Introducc
Approval
Approval
Approval
aJ.
Fee
City of Bwlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(6so) 55&7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGEMA
Rrcu.en MssrNc - WsoNEsoAy, FgBRUABy 20,2002
PAGE 1 oF3
9.
10.
11.
12.
COLTNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
OLD B
NEW BUSIMSS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Planning, Feb 11, 2002;Lihary,Dec
11 & Dec 17 ,2001
b. Department Reports: Treasurer's, Jan 31, 2002 Building,
January,2002
c. Letter from Father A1bert Vucinovich, Pastor, St. Catherine
of Siena Church, 13 10 Bayswater, regarding interfaith
Hospitality Network
d. Letter from Mr. Lynn & Mrs. Betty Trembly, 2103
Carmelita, regarding paving & maintenance of
Avenue and Public Works responseVancouver
e. Letter of February I ,2002 from Mike Harvey's
Autoconnection regarding parking
enforcement on Carolan Avenue & Cadillac Way
f. Letter from Blueprints - Printables, Barbara Hewitt & John
Basye, L129 Cortez regarding lack of audio
transmission at Council meeting on February 4,
2002 andCM's response
13. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any atteudees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please conract the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at
least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at tire City Clerk's
otlice, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, tiom 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. befbre the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the
City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site.
INEXT MEETING - March 4,2002
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
January 30,2002
1. SPECIAL MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the Conference RoomA. The meeting was called to order at 4:18 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
Baylock
b
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
4. CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to closed session to discuss the following two items on the agenda:
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code $ 54957.6:
City Negotiator: Robert Bell, Jim Nantell, IEDA
Labor Organizations : Police Offi cers Association
Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code $ 54956.8: property:
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Right-of-Way adjacent to the Peninsula Corridor
Joint Powers Board Right-of-Way
Aeency Negotiators: Jim Nantell, George Bagdon, Lany Anderson, and Mike Nave
Negotiatine Parties: San Francisco PUC
Under Consideration for negotiations: Purchase of property
5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 5:24 p.m.
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
1 January 30,2002
?+a.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the Lane Community
Room of the Burlingame Library. The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Mayor Mary
Janney.
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
Baylock
STAFF PRESENT
Larry Anderson, George Bagdon, Rahn Becker, Bob Bell, George Bagdon, Al Escoffier, Gary Missel,
Meg Monroe, Ann Musso, Jim Nantell, Bill Reilly, and Randy Schwartz
3. REVTEW OF 2001
City Manager Jim Nantell noted that the purpose of this meeting is to review the past year and look
ahead at the big picture as well as allow Council to comment on the work program for 2002. }OOL,
like the previous year, proved to be very busy for most departments.
4. REVIEW CURRENT YEAR BUDGET OUTLOOK AND PRELIMINARY 2OO2l03
GENERAL FUND BUDGET PLAN
ACM Becker outlined the current year's budget and discussed the preliminary 2002103 general fund
budget plan.
5. REVIEW WATER A SEWER FINANCIAL NEEDS AND A ATED REVENUE
NEEDS AND FEE INCREASES
ACM Becker and DP Bagdon reviewed water and sewer financial needs, anticipated revenue needs
and fee increases as well as discussed the report from Kelling, Northcross & Nobriga outlining the
long term financial plan for sewer and water funds.
6. REVIEW COUNCIL DRAFT 2OO2 GOALS
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
1 February 2,2002
2. ROLL CALL
CM Nantell discussed the Council's goals for 2002, discussed a letter written by Councilwoman
Baylock requesting the city fund a Significant Property List, and also discussed different forms of
communication staff uses to contact the Council.
7. DEPARTMENT HEAD "NEW YEARS RESOLUTIONS" - COUNCIL OUESTIONS
Each department head gave an overview of their 2002 "New Year's Resolutions" and answered
Council questions regarding these goals.
8. PLANNING APPEAL FEES
On the request of Council, CA Anderson discussed Planning Appeal fees and the manner in which
Council may call up an item and waive the $250.00 fee.
9. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Tim Auran complimented staff on their hard work throughout the year. Ken Musso , l40l Grove,
hoped the sidewalk repair program would continue for residential streets in Burlingame.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting atll:45 a.m
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
2February 2,2002
APPROVED MINUTES
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
February 4,2002
1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:06 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney.
7 PLEDGE OF ALLE CE TO THE FLAG,
Led by Rahn Becker.
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
Baylock
1
CLOSED SESSION
CA Anderson noted Council met in closed session prior to the meeting to discuss two items
Council discussed ongoing negotiations with the Police Officers Association and instructed City
Negotiators, Jim Nantell, City Manager, Bob Bell, Human Resources Director, and IEDA with
regard to those negotiations.
2. Council was provided an update in regards to the pending litigation between Marini and the City
of Burlingame in San Mateo Superior Court.
4. MINUTES
Councilwoman O'Mahony noted under "Public Comments", Mr. Beane resides in San Carlos, not
Belmont. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 23,2002
meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman
Baylock absent.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Councilman Galligan made a motion to continue items 5f) Appeal of the Planning Commission's
decision regarding 1509 Los Montes and 5g) Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision regarding
1224/122611228Paloma Avenue until the February 20th meeting; seconded by Councilwoman
O'Mahony, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Baylock absent. CP Monroe noted
both items would be re-noticed for the February 20 meeting. At this time, Mark Hudak, attorney for
1Burlingame City Council February 4,2002
owners of 1509 Los Montes, wanted to know if the story poles could be removed. Councilman
Galligan stated he had not yet seen the story poles and requested they not yet be removed.
a.REVIEW AND RENEWAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR FANNY & ALEXANDER,
1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE 303-305 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
CA Anderson recommended Council review the existing amusement permit for Fanny & Alexander
and renew the permit for six (6) months. This establishment has been open approximately l8 months;
last fall Fanny & Alexander expanded into additional floor space off Califomia Drive. The police
department and Fanny and Alexander continue to work together on security issues. Attached to the
staff report is a letter from Fanny & Alexander stating what measures they have taken to increase
security. The establishment has begun to charge a cover charge at the door, which hopefully will act as
an additional security checkpoint and this measure would be recognized in the proposed conditions.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Jeffrey Weinberg, representing Fanny & Alexander, 1108
Burlingame Avenue, stated he agreed with the City Attorney regarding the renewal of their amusement
permit. Mr. Weinberg requested clarification of when they were allowed to have music. CA Anderson
confirmed the permit allows music Monday thru Sunday.
There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the renewal of the amusement permit for Fanny
& Alexander, 1108 Burlingame Avenue; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey. At this time, Councilman
Galligan stated he opposed the renewal of the amusement permit due to security issues. Vice Mayor
Coffey noted with an amusement permit being requested by the restaurant next door to Fanny &
Alexander, there is the possibility of increased security issues.
Motion passed 3-1-1, with Councilman Galligan dissenting and Councilwoman Baylock absent.
b.CONSID ERATION OF AMUSEME PERMIT FOR HOLA !MEXICAN
RESTAURANT AT 1448 BURLINGAME AVENUE
CA Anderson recommended Council consider the application for an amusement permit for Hola!
Mexican Restaurant at 1448 Burlingame Avenue and if approved, permit to be subject to renewal in
six months. The amusement permit is for live music and disc jockey music. The police department is
recommending that the back door that exits to the private parking lot on Chapin be closed when food is
no longer being served and be used only as an emergency exit.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Richard Beale, Hola! Mexican Restaurant,I44S Burlingame
Avenue was available to answer questions.
There were no further questions and the hearing was closed.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to grant the amusement permit for Hola! Mexican Restaurant at
1448 Burlingame Avenue; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved by voice vote 4-0-1, with
Councilwoman Baylock absent.
2February 4,2002 Burlingame City Council
c.CONSIDERATION OF AMUSEMENT FOR LEFT AT ALBUOUEROUE
RESTAURANT AT 11OO BURLINGAME AVENUE
CA Anderson recommends Council consider application for amusement permit for Left at
Albuquerque at 1100 Burlingame Avenue and if approved, permit to be subject to renewal in six
months; noted this permit is not valid until such time as the conditional use permit for the restaurant is
amended to allow operation past 10:30 p.m.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Robert Sanders, General Manager of Left at Albuquerque
Restaurant, 1100 Burlingame Avenue, stated he is working with some promoters on the security issues
and will work with the police department regarding the same. Noted double doors are kept closed at
all times unless patrons are coming in or out of the restaurant and will purchase crowd control ropes to
keep lines controlled. Agreed to bring tables and chairs into the restaurant after normal business hours.
CA Anderson noted the Planning Department planning permit calls for the restaurant to close at 10:30
p.m., which means the applicant will have to go back to the Planning Commission to request an
approval to extend their business hours.
Frank Gomez, 1469 Bellevue Avenue, noted they will turn the speakers away from the double doors
which will help with the sound.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve the amusement permit for Left at Albuquerque, 1100
Burlingame Avenue; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with
Councilwoman Baylock absent.
At this time, Mayor Janney again stated that items 50 (1509 Los Montes) and 59(12241122611228
Paloma) were continued to the February z}'n meeting for those who may have arrived at the meeting
late.
d.CONSIDER TION OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR DO OBBY
UNLIMITED AT 1205 BROADWAY FOR FIVE MACHINES
CA Anderson recommended consideration of amusement permit for Dollarwise/I{obby Unlimited at
1205 Broadway for five video machines and if approved, permit to be subject to renewal in six months.
The police department has reviewed the application and have no concems at this time.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the amusement permit for Dollarwise/llobby
Unlimited at 1205 Broadway for five video machines; seconded by Councilman Galligan. Vice Mayor
Coffey asked staff if there was any discussion by the applicant whether or not players would receive
prizes or some type of remuneration; CA Anderson stated this would be looked into, but it was not
requested by the applicant. VM Coffey requested the maker of the motion add a condition noting no
remuneration be allowed in regards to these five video machines; the maker of the motion agreed.
Amended motion passed 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Baylock absent.
JBurlingame City Council February 4,2002
E. ADOPT ORDINANCE #1678 AMENDING SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRI CT TO REMOVE DALY CITY FROM
BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
City Attorney recommended Council adopt Ordinance to remove Daly City from the boundaries of the
San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District. The Daly City hotel owners explained
that there is no tourism or conference/convention business in Daly City and no interest in attracting it.
There has been no interest expressed by the City of Daly City in remaining in the District.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to adopt Ordinance #1678 amending San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District to remove Daly City from boundaries of the district; seconded by
Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved byvoice vote,4-0-1, with Councilwoman Baylock absent.
Mayor Janney requested City Clerk Musso publish a summary of the Ordinance no more than 15 days
from adoption.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
7. STAFF REPORTS COMMUNICATIONS
a.,4'8680: A ORIZING MAYOR SIGN LETTER IN ITION
ACM Becker recommended Council authorize Mayor Janney to sign letter opposing Assembly Bill
680
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to authorize the Mayor to sign a letter in opposition of
Assembly Bill 680; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with
Councilwoman Baylock absent.
b.INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMEND TITLE 13 TO CLARIF"T AND AFFIRM
PARKING ULATIONS WITH REGARD TO STREET AND PUBLIC OFF-STREET
PARKING
DPW Bagdon recommended Council introduce Ordinance to revise City Municipal Code Section 13;
this section covers driving rules within the City. In reviewing this section with the Police Department
and the City Attorney, various changes are recommended which will better regulate vehicle parking
and operation.
Mayor Janney requested City Clerk Musso read the title of the proposed Ordinance. Councilwoman
O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Councilman
Galligan, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with councilwoman Baylock absent.
4February 4,2002 Burlingame City Council
Councilman Galligan made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance, seconded by Vice Mayor
Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Baylock absent.
Mayor Janney requested City Clerk Musso publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five
days before the proposed adoption.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a.TRANSMITTAL OF 2OOO.O1 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT.
MANAGEMENT PROCEDURAL REYIEW, AND GOLF REVIEWS
ACM Becker recommended Council review and accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report,
Management Procedural Review and Golf Center Reviews.
b. REFUND OF PLANNING APPEAL FEES FROM FIRST METHODIST CHURCH. 1443
HOWARD AVENUE
CA Anderson recommended Council refund planning appeal fees filed by First Methodist Church.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor
Coffey, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Councilwoman Baylock absent.
9, COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City.
10. OLD BUSINESS
Council Galligan discussed the sewer backup that occurred in December, 2000 at 1344 Skyview and
explained the history of the situation.
II. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Planning, January 28,2002; Parks & Recreation, January 17 ,2002
b. Letter from David Woodrow, 1316 Drake, regarding trees at 1320 Drake Avenue
c. Letter from Doug Gettel, 1608 Lassen Way, regarding sewer difficulties at 1344 Skyview;
response letter from City Attorney
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at8:20 p.m. in honor of Walter Gilliam who was recently
inducted into the Northern Califomia Golf Hall of Fame.
Burlingame City Council 5 february 4,2002
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
6February 4,2002 Burlingame City Council
$TAFF REPORT
t
HONORABLE ITIAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL srrBltrrrrED 1lBY IV
\
I
)
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
Sa-
z{tr $-2
TO:
DArE: JANUARY 24.2002
APPROVED
F.ROM:CITY PLANNER
SIIBIECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION,S N ON DESIGN REVIEW AND
A HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PER]VIIT X'OR A I\-EW TWO.STORY SINGLE
FAMILY HOUSE AT 1509 LOS MONTf,S AVf,NTIE, ZONED R-1.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should hold a public hearing and take action. The conditions of approval recommended by the
Planning Commission should be considered at the public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution
and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. Council's action alternatives are:. Uphold the Planning Commission and approve the project;
o Reverse the Planning Commission and deny the project;
o Deny without prejudice the project and return it to the Planning Commission with specific
direction about design changes needed (This action could include direction to the applicant
to work with a design reviewer to address the changes suggested.) A redesigned project
would need to return to the Planning Commission for action.
The action alternatives and the criteria for design review and a Hillside Area Construction Permit are included
at the end of the staffreport for reference.
Conditions Approved by the Planning Commission
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 30, 2001, sheets Al, A4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,2001, sheets A2 and
A.3, and date stamped October 12,2001, sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of
the building shall require and amendment to this permit;
that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, fust or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing
the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
that the conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building
Official's May 7, 2001, memos shall be met;
that the dimensions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l'-0" x2l'-0";
that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing bay tree at
the left side of the property shall remain after construction;
BY
1
)
J
4
5
I
6
7
8
APPEAL OF.THE PL/INNING COMMISSION'S DECISION ON DESIGN REWEW AND A HILLSIDE AREA
CONS{RUChTON PONUTT FORA NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FATIILY HOASE AT 1509 LOS MONTES AWNUE,
ZONEDR-I. FEBRUARY4,2OO2
that no fence or other permanent structure shall be erected in the 5'-0" public sewer easement located
at the rear ofthe property;
that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance
recently approved by the City Council; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Planning Commission Action
At their meeting on December 10, z}Ol,the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 3-2-l-1
(Cers. Boju6s ind Keele dissenting, C. Vistica abstaining, C. Osterling absent) to approve the design and
Hillside Area Construction permit for a new house with a detached garuge at 1509 Los Montes Avenue. This
item had been reviewed seviral times by the planning commission (design review study, July 7,2001 where it
was referred to a design reviewer, October 22,2001, a second design review study because the applicant
completely redesigned the house, November 13,2OOl a third design review study after the new design had
been referred to a design reviewer). At the December 10, z}Ol,the commissioners noted in support: the
height of the p.opos"d project is not much greater (3 fee| than the original house, the roof lines blend well,
attaihing the garage to the house would make it look massive, the proposed detached garage is pedestrian
friendly; not having an attached garage with doors on the street is an asset to the neighborhood, the lot is 9,108
SF and proposed FAR is .44 where .48 is allowed; the project has been greatly improved by the design review
process.
In opposition commissioners noted: the design of the house is still too massive, a smaller project would be
-o..-upp.opriate to the fabric of the neighborhood; in redesign the size of the house was reduced by only a
minor amount, 300 SF, from the original application.
BACKGROUND:
Ron Grove, the applicant and property owner, is requesting a Hillside Area Construction Permit and a design
review for a newlwo story house at 1509 Los Montes Avenue, zoned R-1. The new house will be 3,989 SF
(FAR .44) where a 4,415 SF (.45 FAR) is allowed on the 9,108 SF lot. The proposed house will have 7
bedrooms and the on site parking requirement will be met by a two car,20' x 20' detached garage, with
uncovered parking provided in the l8' x 20' area of the driveway. The existing Redwood trees on site in the
rear right co.ne. , and the Bay tree, at the left side of the property, will remain after construction.
StaffComment
City Staffhave reviewed this request. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and feels that the protected
Reiwood and Bay trees are sufficiently removed from the construction site that they will not be affected. No
arborists report was required.
planning staffwould note that this is the second house designed by the applicant for this site. A part of the
issue with this application is the meaning of "consistency with the neighborhood". [n this situation the
existing neighborhood has a pattern which is does not build on the objectives of the approved residential
design guidiliner. For example many of the houses have attached garages with traditional flat land design
wheie ihe ar"u is hilly. A few new houses have been built in this area, many before residential design review,
and they have initiated the beginnings of a new pattern. Because of the size of the lots (about 9,000 SF)
2
APPEAL OE THE PI^ANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION ON DESIGN REWEW AND A HILLSIDE ARE,A
CONSTRACTION PERtrIIT FORA NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOASE AT 1509 LOS MONTES AVENAE,
ZONEDR-I. FEBRUARY4'2002
these new houses tend to be larger than the existing houses which are small, split level houses with attached
garages. The existing houses are typically about 2,500 SF (.27 FAR), where our code would allow about
4,415 SF (.48 FAR).
At the design review for the first design, a two story house (.47 FAR" 4,283 SF) with 8 bedrooms and a
detached garage (Planning Commission StaffReport, July 23,2001minutes), the Planning commission
expressed the following concerns: the design is not consistent with this neighborhood of split level houses, it
was designed for a flat lot; it is too bulky, reduce the plate height on both the first and second floors to 9' and
8' respectively; design trend in this neighborhood is changing, but this design does not reflect the materials or
plate heights of the newer homes; porch seems to be a token for the design guidelines does not fit the floor
plan (accessible only from the dining room), concerned about view blockage for neighbors; should consider
remodel of existing not demolition and new construction.
After discussion with the design reviewer, the applicant submitted a completely new design for the site a new
two story house (.44 FAR, 3,989 SF) This redesign was reviewed by the Planning Commission at design
study on October 22,2001. The neighbors on either side spoke in opposition to the new proposal noting its
size, detached garage, and visibility from their properties. The Commission directed the applicant to: install
story poles to outline the full box of the house proposed to confirm view impacts; provide elevations of houses
on either side so can determine the impact of the new house on the neighbors; need to address the mass and
windows on the front and southwest elevations; not enough parking on site for a7 bedroom house. The item
was continued to a time when the additional information was available.
The commission heard the project studied on October 22,2001, again at design review study on November 13,
2OOT. The commission directed the applicant to install story poles which show the relationship of the house
to the surrounding properties; house is nicely designed but size is still massive compared to its neighbors;
height compared to neighbors is a concern would like to see it smaller; provide a detailed landscape plan,
show existing tree in the side yard and the impact preserving it would have on the driveway and garage
location. It was noted that. this design is an improvement over the first design, it conforms to code
requirements with no variances, having seen the rooflines it will fit in nicely, the neighboring roof line on the
uphill side will always be higher than what is proposed to be built, there is a 10' setback on the right side and
a 12'-6" setback on the driveway side which benefits the neighbor by increasing the separation, and there are
large trees on the adjoining properties which provide screening. The item was set for action at the December
10, 2001, meeting where it was approved (see Planning Commission Action section above).
ATTACHMENTS:
Action Alternatives, Design Review Criteria, Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit
Monroe letter January 8,2002, to Ron Grove, setting appeal hearing
Frederick and Susan Smith, l5l5 Los Montes, letter January 7 , 2002, to City Clerk, requesting appeal
Planning Commission Minutes, December 10, 2001
Clint Gee, 3109 Cananea Ave, letter October 19, 2001, to Planning Commission
Fredrick and Susan Smith, 1515 Los Montes, letter July 19,2001, to Planning Commission, with photos
Planning Commission StaffReport, December 10, 2OOl, with attachments
Resolution
Notice of Public Hearing, Appeal, mailed January 25,2002
Action Alternatives and Code Required Finding Critcria for Design Review and
Hitlside Area Construction Permit for 1509 Los Montes Avenue
ACTION ALTERNATIYES
1. City courrcil may vote in favor of an applicant's request. Ifthe action is a variance, use
permit, hillside area construction permit, fence exception, sign exception or exception to
the antenna ordinance, the Council must make findings as required by the code. Findings
must be particular to the given properties and request. Actions on use permits should be
by resolution. A majority of the Council members seated during the public hearing must
agree in order to pass an affirmative motion.
2. City Council may deny an applicant's request. The reasons for denial should be clearly
stated for the record.
3.City Council may deny a request without prejudice. This action should be used when the
application made to the City Council is not the same :N that heard by the Planning
Commission; when a Planning Commission action has been justifiably, with clear
direction, denied without prejudice; or when the proposed project raises questions or
issues on which the Council would like additional information or additional design work
before acting on the project. Direction about additional information required to be given
to stafi applicant and Planning Commission/City Council forthe further consideration
should be made very clear. Council should also direct whether any subsequent hearing
should be held before the City Council or the Planning Commission.
DESIGN REYIEW CRITERIA
The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No.1591 adopted by the Council on
April20, 1998 are as follows:
1 Compatibility ofthe architectural style with that of the existing character of the
neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood,
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure
4. Interface ofthe proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
REQTIIRED FINDINGS FOR AN HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
Code Sec. 25.61.060: Review by the planning commission or city council shall be based upon
the obstruction by the construction of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis
shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit.
Jaruary 25,2OOl
!J
ffiw
Pleoi0g Dcp(tment
CIIY OF BT]RLINGAME
Vbqar(*W\^n%--
City Hatl - 5ol Prirc Rmd
Bwlirym, Califonia 9,1010"3997
January 8,2002
RonGrove
570 B Marine View
Belmont CA 94002
Dear Mr. Grove ,
Atthe City Council meeting of January 8,2002,the called forreview
and scheduled a public hearing on your project at zoned
R-1. The public hearing will be held on February 4,20A2 at7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA.
We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me if you
have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Tel. (55o) 55&200
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MIWs
l509tOSMcc.cu
c:Fred Strathdee & Associates
City Clerk
DISTRIBUTION:
Xcityco,mcit {Y\@/ pleasercspond
ffil*1'! on.*$Required
ficityrunner
Dir. Public Works
Hun!trn Resourc€s
Police C-hief
Fire Chief
Parks & Rec
Librarian
ponNextn'renaa
RECEIVED
JAN 0 ? 2002
ffiS'ffif,ffiE
p
D
Io
tr
b
b
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOT'R
RESPONSE TO TIIE CTTY CLERK T.IAYOR & GIIT COI'NCIL::
A EEARIilG,FOR
COUH$SSION APPEAL
LOS MONTES FOR
4,2OO2.
ltusso, cIrY CLERK
l,
DearCityClerk:
We would like to apeeal to tre City Council tr€ decision ofthe planning Commission on
December 10, 2001 relative to the property tocated at 1509 Los Montes Drive, Burtingame,.
Enclosed is our check in the amount of $250 to cover the Apeals fee.
Thank you for your coosideration in this matter.
Yours very
/./;4
,,,1f:!oo
"rr,rrr;;;
J. FrededckSmith
Smirh
':-.,.
.,.] :City Cle*
City ofBurlingame
501 Primrose Road
lulinganre, CA 9CI10
I 6.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes December 10,2001
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C.
Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m.
1509 LOS MONTES AYENIIE - ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND
HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO.STORY SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (RON GROYE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
FRED STRATHDEE, F.R. STRATIIDEE & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (45 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staffreport,l2.l0.0l, with attachments. Chair Vistica noted that he would abstain from voting
because of a business relationship wittr the applicant. He stepped down from the dais Vice Chair Keighran
proceeded with the hearing. CP Monroe presented the staff repor! reviewed criteria and staffcomments.
Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if staff knew the height of the
existing structure. Staff referred the question to the applicant.
Vice Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Ron Grove, applicant and owner was present to answer
questions. He noted that the proposed two-story house is just 3'-0'higher than the existing house. He has
made an effort to make changes to the plans to address Commission concerns, including installing story
poles and re-routing the driveway to save the bay tree on the lot. He pointed out that there are numerous
two-story houses in the neighborhood and that the floor area ofthe proposed house is 500 SF less than the
amount the code allows. He noted that no views will be blocked by the proposed house.
Susan Smith, 1515 Los Montes Drive, spoke corrcerning the proposed house. She feels that the story
poles do not show the whole picture or impact of the new house; she will lose a view from the living
room of her house, looking south; the house does not fit into the neighborhood; XJVo of thehomes have
attached garages and this house has a detached garage. There were no further comments and the public
hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: story poles were a greathelp in evaluating the project; the proposed height is only
3'-0" higher than the existing; the Bay tree has been saved on the properly; there are other homes ofthis size
in the neighborhood. -
C. Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution. There was no second on the motion to approve.
Further Commission discussion: height of the proposed project is not greatly increased over the existing
height; the roof lines of the house are blended well; an attached garage would make the house look massive;
the proposed detached garage is pedestrian friendly; the design of the house is still too massive; a smaller
project would be more appropriate to the fabric of the neighborhood; not having an attached garage with
doors on the street is an asset to the neighborhood; the project has been greatly improved by the design
review process.
Vice Chair Keighran moved to approve the application; by resolution, with the following conditions: l) that
the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
November 30,2001, sheets Al, A4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,200l,sheets A2 and A3, and date
stamped October 12,2A01, sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area ofthe building shall
require and amendment to this permit;2)lhatany changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or
second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
-5-
City of Burlingarne PlaruingCommission Mirutes Decembq 10,2001
archit€ctural features or changing the roof height or pitclU shall be subject to design revien4 3) that the
conditions of the City Engineer's; Crty Recycling Specialist's, and the Ctrief Building Official's May 7,
}C0l,memos shall be met; 4) that the dimensions ofthe proposed detached garage shall be 2l'-C' x2l'-0";
5) that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right comer of the property and the I existing Bay tree at the
left side ofthe property shall remain after constnrction; 6) that no fence or otherperrranent stnrctrne shall be
erected in the 5'-0" public sewer easement located at the rear ofthe property; 7)t@t the project shrll comply
with the proposed demolition and constnrctionrecycling ordinance recently approved bythe City Council;
and 8) that the project shall meet all the requiiements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Discussion on the motion: in redesign the size of the house was reduced by only a minor amounf 300 SF,
from the original application
Vice Chair Keighran called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed ona3-2-l-l
" (Crs. Bojuis and Keele dissentine. C. Vistica abstaining, C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were" advised. This item concluded at o:20 p.m.. , :
7. 1147 ROLLINS ROAD _ ZOI\ED C.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDMONAL USE PERMT TO
STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI.MART (GUS GRECO,
& CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVER TRUST, PROPERTY
Reference staff report, I 2. I 0.01,CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments. Nine conditioffi were for consideration. Commissioners asked: were the traffic
numbers used to project trips for a at this location averages taken from anothersource or counts
bases on this particular location; the
source; the numbers show an increase of with
the same size; it is hard to tell since the increase is the sum of a number of site specific taffic
counts; in one submittal it notes that the County Health
meary the qpplicant should address this. Is itpossible to
has approved this use, what does that
--. prob-lem with the numbering of the on-site parking spaces
awkward, given the intersection, has the applicant discussed ofthe entire site to improve the
use of this site relative to the signalized intersection. This
were no furttrer questions of staff.
was directed to *re applicant There
Chainnan Vistica opened the public hearing. Mark Hudalq 216Park Road, representing the
on mini-rirart hip generation from a standard
addition ofamini-marg were these gas stations
cash onlyATM? Yes. There see'msto be a
the plan5. Access to and from this site is
,
property owners Gus and Gladys Crreco, noted that the applicant
on the Peninsulq which they have convdrted to mini-marts
two or three other similar gas stations
this application was submitted the
applicant has re-evaluated the proposed operation based on comments made by the Commission,
including not selling alcoholic beverages; they have found that it to find qualified mechanics to
for a gas station with mini-martzupport the service part of the gas station business, this is an ideal
because of its proximity to the freeway; they hired John Wilson to do a
resolving the study paramoters with the Engineering Departnentthetip
sales from the site and adjusted by the increase in tips as documented by
Government trip generation studies formini-marts, these indicate that
with a mini-mart on the site, equivalent of 26 individual tips (13 in and out);that addingamini-mart
will notgenerate alotmore customersbutwill causethe existingcustomersto spendmoremoneyufrenthey
stop for gas; they have had an ATM that only dispenses cash on the site for several years; concerned about
-6-
AN EXSTING
San Diego
13 more customers
ITEM #8 - 1509 Los l'lontes
PC Ueeging LO 122 lOl
IIEM RECEIVED AI'TER PREPAXAIIO
OF PACKET
October 19,2001
Re: 1509 Loe Montes Drive
Oclober 22, 2001 Hearing
Honorable Planning Commissioners,
As a neighbor to 1509 Los Montes Drive, I have had an opportunity to
review the n€w plans with the help of your diligent strafi. Unfortunately I will not
be able to attend the hearing as scfieduled.
There is improvement with the plan over its predecessor, but it still does
not resolve my concems. The design I feel is still not compatible with the
neighborhood. Wthin a halta-block or more, it will be the only two-story home.
The new home will have a dominate presence in the area where the modest-
looking splillevel houses has not changed much in appearance for years.
Although the appeamne of the new home has been tone down. lt could be less.
It is still too bulky. lt will also reduce sunlight to the areas across from it and on
the northem-side. Setting back the second level trom the fiont and northem-side
of the house will help. The new plan is an improvement, but not the solution to
my con@ms.
I hope the Board will preserve the neighborhood's character and make
changes lo the Los Montes design in that vein. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely
Clint Gee
3109 Cananea Avenue RECEIVED
ocT 2 2 2001
CIIY OF BURTINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
C9*
?..eruzA ^'fgr 'ltr-
gco.go.rq-1,'o ',,\ o$ -lkr- ?ta'n,1, ",7
cc,r.,rv^r. isc',b a ga.c'Lrat '
J. Frederick and Susal S. Smith
15l5 Los Montes Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
July 19, 2001
Plarming Commission
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 1509 Los Montes Drive
Dear Planning Commissioners:
On July 23, 2001 you will hold a public hearing regarding the application for desigt review and
hillside area construction permit for anew dwelling to be constructed at 1509 Los Montes Drive.
We are unable to attend this meeting and hope you will consider our concerns in your
deliberations. Ifyou need to contact us, we will be available after July 24,2001. our telephone
number is 650-344-77 58.
We live at l5l5 Los Montes Drive, which is adjacent to 1509. There are six houses in a row
on our side ofthe street all of similar construction and style - essentially splitJevel (because ofthe hill)
one-story, ranch qpe. 1509 is the second ofthese six houses and the proposed two-story, eight
bedroom structure almost in the middle of these six houses is totally out of character with the
neighborhood. We are enclosing two photo$aphs - the one with two houses is 1509 on the left and our
house, 1515, on the right. The second picture is the house adjacent to ours on the north side - 1519.
All the other houses are of similar style.
Of more personal concem is the fact that construction of the structure at 1509 as proposed will
destroy the view from our family room. We are enclosing a photograph taken from our family roonl
looking out over our deck directly at the back of the property at 1509. The rooftop and back of 1509,
which is one-story on our side, can be seen at the left. If the proposed structure is built - two-story and
-extending another 20 or 30 feet to the right- and the existing trees are removed, we will be looking at
the wall of a building. Not only will we lose our view, but we fear that the sunlight that we now get in
our yard will be shaded by the new structure. Is it possible to have a story pole erected lhat would
show the height and dimensions ofthe proposed structure?
If there is some way to reduce the sheer mass of the proposed structure to be more in keeping
with ttre neighborhood and protect our view, we would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours very truly,
RECEIVE D
JUL 2 0 i001
C ITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
/ l;d.
-; Yi:" .
-,.::
.i,l'),
": 'i 'rl'
ir
.,
' 1..
.1
r...*
-_GI tr:.iIIi
I
-.qEl- _tll}
t
a^;
-ltilEr
f'
Item # {n
Regular Action Calendar
-r--i{t-r ._-irr- ft
I
PROJECT LOCATION
l509 Los Montes Drive
.t",:npe
$
I
I
I
I lrt
,
I
I
I
I
I
,- _-_-r._-.):3;t )::*" a*^rL
RegularCity of BurHngame
Design Review and a Hillside Area Construction
Permit for a New, Two-Story Dwelling
Address: 1509 Los Montes Drive Meeting Date: l}ll0l0l
Request: Design review and a hillside area consfruction permit for a new, two-story dwelling with a
detached garage (C.S. 25.57 .010, 25.28.040).
Applicant and Property owner: Ron Grove APN: 027-045-080
Designer: Fred Strathdee Lot Area: 9108 sF
General Plan: Low DensityResidential Zoning: R-l
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303- Class 3- construction and location
of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in
conjunction with the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family
residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.
Summary: The existing two-story dwelling with attached garage will be demolished. The applicant is
proposing a new, two-story dwelling with a detached garage. The proposed floor area will be 3989 SF
(0.44 FAR) were 4415 SF (0.48 FAR) is the ma;rimum allowed. The new dwelling will have 7 rooms that
meet the code definition of a bedroom. The proposed detached garage provides two covered parking
spaces (20' x 20), which meet the code requirements for a 7 bedroom house. The proposed driveway
provides two adjacent uncovered parking spaces (18 x 20). The existing redwood fees on site, in the rear
right corner of the properly, and the bay tree at the left side of the property, will remain after consfiuction.
The City Arborist has reviewed the plans. Because the existing trees are located a safe distance from the
proposed construction, the City Arborist has not required a report detailing protection measures for the
trees during construction. The property is located in the Hillside Construction Permit Area. All other
zoning code requirements have been met.
The applicant is requesting the following:
o Design Review for a new, two-story dwelling; and
a Hillside Area Construction Permit.
Ilistory: This project came before the Planning Commission for a design review study hearing on July
23,2001. At this meeting, the Planning Commission referred the project to a design review consultant
(see July 23,2001Planning Commission minutes). Based on the Planning Commission's comments at
design review study, the house has been completely redesigned. Because it was a new proposal, the
project went back to the Planning Commission as a design review study item on October 22,2001.
At the October 22,2001 study hearing, the Planning Commission requested that the applicant provide
elevations for the new house that imposed the outline of the existing house so that the mass and scale of
the proposed house could be compared with the existing house. The Commission also requested that the
applicant provide a cross section of the proposed house and the houses on either side (see October 22,
2001 Planning Commission minutes). The project was continued to the next available meeting. The
applicant submitted the requested information (see Sheets Al, A3 and A4 date stamped October 26,
2001).
Design Review and Hiltside Ares Constraction Permitfor a New, Two-Story Dwelling 1509 Los Montes Drive
November 13, 2001 Design Review Study Hearing: At the November 13,2001 study hearing, the
Planning Commission reviewed the October 26,2001plans and requested the following changes to the
project:
o Install story poles at the front of the house to show the relationship of the proposed to the surrounding
properties;
o Submit a detailed landscape plan showing the existing tree at the left side of the property and the
impacts to the driveway and the garage location; and
o House design and height still appear massive in comparison to the neighboring homes, would like to
see a smaller design.
The project was referred to the next available calendar for a regular action hearing.
In response to the Commission's comments, the applicant has submitted revised plans date stamped
November 30, 2001, Sheets A1, A4 anC Lt showing the following changes:
o The existing tee at the left side of the property is shown as a Bay with a 35" circumference. The free
does not meet the requirements for a protected tree. The revised plans show that to retain the ffee, the
driveway has been repositioned to run along the inside of the hee and the garage has been relocated so
that it is 4'-0" from the side property line, instead of l'-0" from the side property line;
o The applicant plans to install story poles at the front elevation by Friday, December 7,2001; and
o The height of the proposed structure has been clarified to be a height of 29'-3" as measured from the
average top of curb elevation (30'-0" was shown at the November 13, 2001 study hearing).
No additional changes have been made to the design of the house
ect Evaluation:
EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'nPROPOSEI)
SETBACKS
23'-0"
23',-0"
20'-6" is the block average
20,-6"
Front (lstflr):
(2ndflr):
20'-6"
30'-6',
l1'-0u
12'-6"
7'.-0"
7'-0u
Side Qeft):
(right):
12'-6"
l0-0"
94'.-0"
94'-0u
l5'-0'
20'-0u
Rear (Istflr):
(2ndflr):
61'-0u
61'-0u
1750 SF
t9%
3643 SF
4A%
Lot Coverage:2510 sF
28%
1750 sF
O.I9 FAR
4415 SF
0.48 FAR
FAR:3989 SF
0.44 FAR
2
Design Revian and Hiltside Area Construction Permitfor a New, Two-Story Dwelling 1509 Los Montes Drive
PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ',n
Parking:2 covered
(20'x 20)
2 uncovered
(9'x 20')
2 covered
(20'x 20)
I uncovered
(9'x 20)
# of bedrooms:7
Height:29'-3"30'-0"
DH Envelope:complies see code
Staff Comments: See attached. Staff would note that there were four letters submitted to the Planning
Department from neighbors in response to the application. This projcct is in the Hillside Area
Construction Permit zone and the letters are attached to the staff report for the revised project.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. l59l adopted by
the Council on April 20,1998 are outlined as follows:
l. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the stnrctures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a hillside area construction
permit by the planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant
,i.*r of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable
areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060).
planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action rnorrtO be by resolution and include findings made for design review and hillside area construction
permit, and the ,"urorr for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following
conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparfrnent date
stamped November 30, 2001, sheets Al, A4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,2001, sheets A2
and A3, and date stamped October 12, 2OOl, sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or
floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;
I
3
5
Design Review and Hittside Area Construction Permitfor a New, Two-Story Dwelling 1509 Los Montes Dive
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features
or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building
Offrcial's May 7, 2001, memos shall be met;
4. that the dimensions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l'-0" x2l'-0";
that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing bay hee
at the left side of the property shall remain after construction;
that no fence or other permanent structure shall be erected in the 5'-0" public sewer easement
located at the rear of the property;
that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance
recently approved by the City Council; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Erika Lewit
Zonrng Technician
c: Ron Grove
6.
7
8
4
I
City of Burtingame Planning Commission Minutes November 13,2001
Commissioners noted that two businesses there previously there are a total of 75 employees, with
this changethatwill to 61, these are independent confiactors, they are not in the office all the time,
have computers at and lap tops, this plan decreases the employees on-site, less than present
tenant; may a parking problem, but if there is they will have to use the on-street
parking,create a problem; meeting may be only a week, but for that hour it isn't working;
well except for Monday meetings,it to be congested at that time, can the meetings be
if the meeting were held between 9:00 a.m. on Mondays, it would not conflict with other
in the area which don't open 9:00 a.m. There were no further comments and
hearing was closed.
C. Keighran moved to application, by resolution, with the conditions: l)h
the 5154 SF first floor area shall be built as shown on the plans to the Planning Deparfrnent
and dated May 30, I sheets 1,2,3 ⋘2,) that the expanded real use on the second floor (4490
SF) shallbebuilt on the plans submitted to the and date stamped October 2,
2001, sheets Second Floor Orficelayout, and that 9644 SF of the building shall be used
shall have a manimum of 61 full-timeby a single business; 3) that the real
and agents and 5 full-time employees;of full-time orpart-time real estate agents and
for this business shall not be an amendment to this permit; 4)that
meeting of agents working from the shall be held onlyon Mondays from 8:00 9:00 a.m.;
that the real estate business on this notbe open forbusiness except
to 6:00 p.m., seven days a week;any changes in operation, floor or number
employees, which exceeds the as stated in these requre an amendmentto this
use permit; 7) that no ofthe first or second floors of shall be sublet to any other
business without to this permit; 8) that the32 parking spaces shall be retained for the
employees on-site clients/customers without to users or the business; 9) that the sign(s)
proposed for
and 10) that
shall require a separate sign the Planning Department prior to installation;
use and any improvements for shall meet all California Building and Fire
1998 Edition as amended by the City ofBur The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
for real
Chairman Vistica called for a roll
(Csrs. Boju6s, Mink dissentingr,€
concluded at 11:15 p.m. *"r
vote on the motion to approve. The
)srerling absent). Appeal procedures
of9:00 a.m.
ofagents or
on a 4-2-l
This item
IX. DESIGN REYIEW STUDY ITEMS
10. 1509 LOS MONTES DRTVE _ ZOI\IED R.l _APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO.STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND
DETACTIED GARAGE EON GROVE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; FRED STRATTIDEE,
F.R. STRATHDEE &ATES. ARCHITECT)
Senior Planner Brooks briefly presented the project description. Chair Vistica noted that he would be
abstaining from the discussion because he has a business relationship with the applicant and he stepped
down from the dais. Vice Chairperson Keighran took over as chair. There lvere no questions of staff.
Vice Chairperson Keighran opened the public comment. The applicant, Fred Strathdee, 147 Leslie, San
Carlos described the project and was available for questions. Susan Smith, 1515 Los Montes Drive and Jay
Smith, 1515 Los Montes Drive, commented on the project. It was noted that as designed, the project is still
1l
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November [i,2001
massive, the design is inconsistent with the neighborhood which is primarily small ranch style houses, asked
if mass could be modified to be one-story or split level like others in the area; would face wall two stories
high, concern with blocking of light in the back yard and the affect on the character of the neighborhood, the
detached garage has a 100'long driveway, appears that 50 year old free would have to be removed for
driveway. The applicant noted that trees are proposed along the property line for privacy, survey didn't show
tree in direct line of driveway, will check, if it is, will work to save tree. There were no other comments
from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Like to see storypoles at front ofhouse to show relationship ofproposed to surrounding properties;
House is nicely designed, but lot is long and narrow, size is still massive in comparison to neighbors;
Height compared to neighbors is a concern, will have impact from street, would like to see it smaller;
Would like to see a detailed landscape plan, and show existing tree and impact on driveway and
garage location.
Comment on motion: it was noted that this design is an improvement over original plan, it conforms to code
with no variances, now that roof lines are shown, feel that it will fit in nicely, the neighboring roof line on
uphill side will still be higher than what is proposed, there is a 10'setback on the right side and a 12'-6"
setback on the left, there are large trees on adjacent property to the right which provide screening. This
motion was seconded by C. Boju6s.
Vice Chairperson Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action
calendar when plans had been revised as directed and storypoles installed. The motion passed on a 5-0-l-l
(C Vistica abstaining, C. Osterling absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not
appealable. This item concluded at l1:40 p.m. Chair Vistica took his seat on the dais.
11. 1509 AYENUE _ ZONEI)_ APPLICATION FO REVIEW AND FRONT
SETBACK FOR A FIRS SECOND STORY (JTRAYRKO
Senior Brooks briefly the project description.were no questions
Vistica opened comment. Kamil Tabib,FifteenthAvenue,Cityproject
andJerry I 044 Lome Way, Sunnyvale,owner, commented theproject; they
have been working with design review consultant;to workwith the existing andmake it
more appealing so it with the neighborhood,is deep but the house toward the front,
doesn't allow for an without infringing on front setback, the floor is 6'-6" above
building adjacenttograde, porch is to ty to break up the the front; there is an
the site on the corner El Camino Real and that is set close to the
further, this new porch would provide transition.
o
tr
tr
tr
the block are set
t2
the rest of the houses on
C. Key made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked:
City ofBudingarne Planning bmmission Minutes October 22, 2001
requfuements of Building Code Fire Code, 1998 edition, as by the
City of The motion was by C. Key.
ChairKeighran a voice vote on the motion to the amendment to the action on the
project at l160 to retain the 18 inch window for the four windows
frontage of but to allow three of the four at the front of the 2'-6" display
windows inside the store to provide for the cash registers handlers. Themotion
passed on a 6-0-l (C. Vistica absent). A procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:20 p.m.
Ix. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
8. T5O9 LOS MONTES AYEITT'E B ZOIYED R.I B APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW ANDHILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO.STORY SINGLE FAMILYDWELLINGAND DETACHED GARAGE (RON GROVE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
F'RED STRATHDEE, F.R. STRATHDEE & ASSOCIATES,ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER:
Planner Hurin presented the project description, noting that a neighbor had submitted a letter requesting that
story poles be installed before the action meeting since there has been a design change and there is a view
issue for him. There were no questions by commission of staff.
Acting Chair Keigbran opened the public comment. Fred Stretched, design er,l47 Leslie Drive, San Carlos,
and R9n Grove, property owner, represented the project. Since commission last reviewed the projec! at
commission direction they have worked with a design reviewer, this proposed project is a reduced rir", it fr*
been moved on the lot to increase the side yard, the height was lowered, and the architectural style was
changed to be more compatible with the neighborhood, wood siding was uaa"a. The house is a speJ house,
noted that there is an error on the plans and the finished first floor is one foot lower than shown on the plans.It was noted that the height of the existing struchre is close to 30 feet.
NeighborsJaySmith,l5l5I,osMontes,SusanSmithl5l5IosMontes,PamelaKeys 1505InsMontes,and
Peter Keys 1505 Los Montes, also spoke. They noted the proposed house is too big, most of the houses in
the neighborhood are post-war ranch houses; this proposed addition would block sun in back yard, on declg
and into second story, it would look into the rear bedroom and family room; most ofthe other second stories
on the block have no windows on the shared second story side to insure privacy for adjacent houses; wouldlike to have applicant install story poles, took picture oflast poles and At n" cluld ,"" fro* his house wasthe second story ofthe newhouse. Revisions increase the setback ofthe house on our side, added a row oftees along the shared property line which was good, but the modifications did not change the architecturalstyle enough for the new house to be compatible with the neighborhood; would like to see story poles whichreflect the actual dimensions so beffer abte to judge impact. -Concerned with the detached guug";all otherhouses on the block have attached garages, the detached garage at the rear immediatelynext to the fence willcause firmes in her backyard; also concemcd about drainage from the garage, have hai drainage problems inthe 1ea in the past. If commissioners have been to thi site it is clear-that the proposed design is notconsistent with the neighborhood, nor is the detached garage.
10
x
City of Bui4h6atne platniry &nmxsion Min utes
of City Council regular of October 16,2001
CP Monroe reviewed
She noted that the on
November 7,2001,at
contentofthe
attendance at the 7 meeting; two
City.
Applicant commented that they incruded a detached garage because that is the city,s preference; reduced the;'fi ""J'Hj;T:'1,l":t****t*x,i:xi:#:*ilffi :Tff:lHx;rff areahave,w.
commissioners noted in their discussion: would like to see storypores ofthe t{a trrl demonshate height,I!*flitri*iH"Jr::al,Tit*1the vhore il",,, ,i*ra p.lp*.
"
,.i"i"r"*ioas which impos" thea.1"..i"",.i"i,r"r,*e"i,;;;;,;"ffi;H;.:1:"rr:,,r.Hi*ltil$i*3:**:,ffiff;:rtr
either side so can ey{uat" *r" r""r"."r'rrrrp."p.r"J';rrr", design *;i"** should assist them in
addressing the bulk of the hous", i, roir., .*ri;;6#iry rh. fr";;ail;o the southwest erJvation;
reduce the number orwinaows-on
'nJlia"r, and consi'der;'rir." ilil;;laur"th. size of the house,
this house has 7 bedro;t;a;;it
'io rinr" fiktffi;tr'*.n nor" o' ltilrrid" and very liftr" nl*uy o.,
Los Montes.
c' Bojuds noted if garage were at&achel *: apparent size of the house wourd be-greater, feer that shourd
continue this item io the ""*' -"oi"gi" argrir,1"-ffii: to provide ,,*. Lr"r-ation showing how
project being proposed t"tuio ;;;;;^r and bulk oi[r" J:otrfi;;;;;;;", *oved to continue this
rtem to the next commissior -.;;;;""t*,r .ppr#;a submitted ,r," ro,o*irg,o A set of elevations which impose the outline of the existing house onto the erevations of the
proposed house (front' both sid^es and rear) ," a".r#o"r. tt "-"*t".rt;f *h. proposed change; andal,l:'#,"ff
:::X1iffilffi ::,ffi :1l6:#,**"#fi""Hyersideorthatthecommission
pass this on to the City
with the
ofthe
7:00
October27 2001
16,2001,agenda
on
them. Staff promised to
II
Council.
p.m. would
andthe
scheduled a Joint
a better start time for
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
design fails meet
, effect on
to the
hly 2j, 2001
mass, bulk, neighborhoodall design
views, scale
guidelines,
is currently
and
on the flat of the lot,siting of new house tailored
Provide landscaping how will address size of house.
C.made a to send this to a design with the made. This
was C. Keighran.
Vistica a vote on the to refer this to a design consultant. The
motion on a vorce 6-0-1 (C.absent). The Commission's action is advisory and
This item concluded at9:34
10. 1509 LOS MONTES AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND
HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A NEW TWO-STONY SN{CLE FAMILY
DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (RON GROVE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
FRF,D STRATHDEE- F.R. STRATHDEE &ATF,S. ARCHITF,CT)
Chairman Vistica noted that he would be abstaining from action on this item due to a business relationship
with the owner. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description and noted that two letters were
received from neighbors with concerns about the height, compatiblity of desigrr, and loss of light and view.
There were no questions of staff.
Acting Chair Keiglran opened the public comment. Ron Grove, property owner, presented the project and
passed forward a color rendering of the proposed house. Peter Keys of 1505 Los Montes Drive stated that
he feels that the proposed project does not fit in with the neighborhood, most of the homes are split level
with an attached garage. There are drainage problems in this areq he just spent a lot of money on retaining
walls and is concerned about a detached garage being located near the easement where there is a wall and
a new catch basin. Wife would like them to retain the free in the rear yard. He stated that the design needs
to fit with the neighborhood, detached garage does not fit with the neighborhood. There were no other
comments from the floor and the public commemt was closed.
The commission had the following concerns with the project:
a flat lot, so you will need to fill this lot to make this design work;
upper level;
not
9
City of Burlihgane Planning Commissio Minules July 2i, 2001
D Trend in neighborhood is changing, this desigr does fit with the newer homes, materials appropriate,
plate height should be lowered, in general nice design;
D Doesn't blend with sunoundings, too massive and bulky, corbels around the enhance don't work, plate
height too tall, support detached garage, because it creates larger separations between properties;
D Porch function unusual with access only from dining room, FAR squeezed, front porch because of
interior access appears as a token gesture that was added on, too much square footage in house, cut
square footage to make house harmonize with sunoundings;
D Existing house has a lot to work with, prefer to keep existing houses in good shape and remodel.
Acting Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a desigr review consultant. The
motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-1-l (C. Vistica abstaining and C. Boju6s absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:51 p.m.
11. 1730 ESCALAI\TEWAY-ZO R.I -APPLICATIONFOR IGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A FIRST AND SECOND RY ADDITION (STEWART
CP Monroe efly presented the project There were no questions staff.
Chairman V the public comment.1351 Laurel Sheet San los, architect for
project was availab
diffarent that other
or questions, Mr. Malaas of I Escalante Way stated that the story entry is
s in the neighborhood, he felt the addition may obstruct and views,
doesn't fit in with the exterior wood also not when the homes in area are all
There were no comments from the floor and comment was closed.
sioners had the concerns with the project:
rsa very tall component,ks like a tower, does not fit with ghborhood;
F Need a traditional, lower entry that fits in with the neigh
F Can still get into entry by lowering
metal roof with stone
window and reducing the size of window;F proposed Cal-g may not be appropriate, use a traditional
roofing material
F Hillside area cons permit required, heard em from neighbor regarding vi
need to put up story prior to the action meeting .
place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above
10
C. Luzuriaga made a motion
fore
F Concem with view blockage expressed by the public, needs to install story poles when desigr finalized
and ready to come back for action; and
C. Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This
motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
norT1
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 7,200L
TO:_City Engineer
_Chief Building Offtcial
Marshal
_Sr. Iandscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBIECT: Request for design review and hillside area construction permit for a new rwo.story single
famrly dwelling and detached garage at 1509 Los Montes Drive, zoned R-1, ApN: 02?-
045-080.
REVIEW:7 2001
$!:l/PL7,PSe [uu?--C4*
k ,',e^) 4ar^f.t
s/ <.-
f-il,6_ Urrr{-,
*-*r"tr- (..-p,,*dA
Reviewed By:Date of Comments:
LilM
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 7, 2001
TO:
_Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_Citv Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBIECT: Request for design review and hillside area construction permit for a new two-story single
family dwelling and detached garage at 1509 Los Montes Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-
045-080.
STAIIF REVIEW:7 2001
6 rLb-1 rk *rr>/ h b.-
ft"g I,*-!.C L
S.+b ,,A.4fi
z2- /-c.ci/rtr-/ /a-eL
/tr"a l*.IrC b*- t u*7
>7r-r-{-
siJe *ffi
a*7"
e{*-ac
F*a e d. l*rll ^L- t" lf
Reviewed By:Date of Comments:g -o
i.
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 7, 2001
TO:
Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sn Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
Request for design review and hillside area construction permit for a new rwo-story single
famrly dwelling and detached garage at 1509 Los Montes Drive, zoned R.1, ApN: 022-
045-080.
STAFF REVIEW:7,2001
SUBIECT
Reviewed By:
'/*= 7l,o) old€ w i€Tru 4r lRorey'Zlflb ,QAorzb ry /-bcs< Colt=7 / No
OPaJ7lJ65 AOG 7Z .re ..dd Caas< Z77e.J
Date of Comments:52-a€
ctTY of BURLINGAME H"AI.INING DEPARIIT{ENT 5Ol PRIMRoSB RoAD P (650) 55S7250 F (6sO) 69G3790
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMI\ISSION
Type of appEcation:
Aitt=ia"- ADesignRwiew-!1
Spocial Permit-
{eq-
ConditionalUsePermit VarimceO&er-Parcel
Project
APPLICAI\T
L6s
ARffi
Name: Fr!€D RTtt"/tT h Dge
O66o*, lc+? LesLtS Dn
Citylstxetrjrp: a$O c\at,cslct\ fryms
Phone 67-t - IV?-O
6e7 -18 *O
PROPERTY OWNER
Please indicatc with an asterirk *
the conhct person for this pnoject
r",-* t'\ ir- e1. {i* i'\/.. .-" I r- ! ,- l" i $i r t.- \-, i- r 'd t* L-l
MAY - 3 2001
CITY 0i'3r iiiii'i Cal'iE
PLI\t']il;i'lG DEPT'
xr2-oIt fi,gyg
/.a*ws: S1O & r11&me Ury-r Address:
4n ?wa*
Phone (5io -ST3 -sigll o Phone
g): t€o-SSs ?f?l
n 6
PROTECTDESICRIPTION: NElr, ?nrO sDo{t y f}€slnsua€
AI'FAIIAVIT/$IGNATI RE: I her*y cefiify under penalty of perjury that the information
givenherein.ishre aad to the best of my knowledge and belief.
ApplicantB -Ot
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to zubmit ftis
apptcation to 6e
Prop€rty ovmerb
Planling
PCAPP,FRM
CiBrlSffielTio:
@z f6co) Ost -zt a0
Oate:tf-b - 6 |
rl itccrs Deslgn Review
lsoo tog itonbc Driys, Burtnsarm R EC E I VE DOctober 12, Ml
qighd dans dated; Jufl.e 2O, ZA)1
Revis€d phm daled: SepgnOer'7, Ztnl
Revised plens recgved: Oaober S, 2OO1
0cT 1 2 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
I revien,ltl tlre oonrnents made by fre Plannlng comr{ssron, and compared g.ern b o'e oddnddeggl' I atso revien'ed tlg rEvised plans and cmtPard the changes to g1e plnr;rc cqmillin,scot'rtncnt3' I liotened to the Planning commlssion meding on the hbmot I made cornments on theseptemter 7 dril'ilus aborrt the unbmken me88 Of the soutreast ele\don and this led t|e applicanttorevisehatdenatonendincorprnabanoffsetathernasbrbdh/?aarporEt.
BGCausethisic
essentialy a dfiersnt house than lhd revlerred by tre Plannlrg cornm6$on, lt is bdrrg i*rrneo as asfudy item' However, cnce I clid nlvieuv the deslgn I wilt ouiline my obsen alions.
Generat oorrmonte:
I lke the looks of the hous'e, atthough it is substanthlly differcnt fiom rre deaign prBsented to tha
commission. This des(p is about:350 SF smallerthan tte diglnal, and sewrd tuet nanorrer. ilost
ofthepmhdgttttharebsenloueredtoreducethcororarhdght rhesfrr@atg,etowertevcha
beei reflaed u'lh sitltr9- A stoner cfrmney har been afied sorne lcurl Ghilggs hare been a.lded
in the lorer lloor to befrer accommodatg ore exerlor grad6. wa ncliced a fcw rtiscrepandes that
need derilicaton: The stsdy and gtrst area of the first floor uoultl haw to have a plate heighr ol g.5
or 10'5 het dePemliu on whet nunbers yan look at That area'3 floor ce\ration is shouvn as 54i on
the $te dan, and 542 q the eleraations. ln any case, the lourernoor$ould be rc0e6rl qr the
Southunst and Southeast elewlioru, and wtot the rearside porstr loryerthan choum. Howpwr, the
floordevdon dariftcation'rould mrt elterthe maes of the etructrrc as the sGcond noor plete hsglrt
mahtins a conffi Glovrlion-
Reaponse to Plamlng Commission Comments: I revierruert the nemr desBn to see how it nespods b
PC comments. I belbve th;et tle mnin corrcerns of the pc ara covered bdotf,,
Sihreradt'ng: Wttse as tho origind design l€ft grading up to u1e imagkp6m, gte new 6osi,, do",
sfiourr anlicipded gr€dng. 'Ihe proposod steps in the house floorb\rel crfis tre ]Equlr€d grad0ng in
hatf; a signitlcant irrproranvrent wtlle thers eull is a cut, and sonre dralnage to deal yylffi, it seernE
that raising he ,loor leval frrrficr to ellnt'rneta the gradirxg woLdd onrv hcraase g1e wsll hdght fedng
the neil5or end i,ncreata any sohr. arpacts.
:01 Pari( Roarl. Surt< l0l. Durlingqrne, CA 9lO1o
6r0.579.i7,i2 f.x 6r(,.)79.01 I 5 wrw.trgerrh.<om
T R.G
Bu[c' As previously ffi, ne nute onrrpnG on the slze of fte ltdl fning t,re *hrmy, and ureairflnryrt r'esponded uvilh ule o'fEct rearporctr. The bmrer ovarail l0oigfrt, and the rctluoerl BiCilt t rEl(Bth0s eol,tlcn bs burky tran the dosis, prevlousty revieucd by the pc.
P@ HG*$t As dtrcugsarl above, tfie orrcall date ipi,ght and brllding |reight as btrer h moponee tothe PC'g ooomenb. Ihe clowrrtri[ llrst floorplate is h,gher.
Pottfi: The odd hont porch on the previars design has been e;;,inated and replecad with a nqrentry porfi design_
lfii,il( thls is will dtitndely be a nir:e loding houEo, and this ls a betbrde$gn thanthe ortinat onepr€sented to fie Fc' The Proposed ft6igl falls wut rruirrin ute dedhing hdght en*rope, but si^o' frnepresents a significant lncreass in masE for tris site and conte)d, it eeerns Ulat s6ory po* mlght be inorder.
t
Randy Gnenge AIA
RECEIVED
ocT 1 2 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT,
Item /110 - 1509 Los Montes Avenue
DRS - PC Meetine 7-123.Ol ?e.crud, ^$1P6
'lt^r
frc-gora*t'o.n o$ -l1lr' Plannrnfi
Cav.twrt3tJon f crc'lac-* '
J. Frederick and Susan S. Smith
l5l5 Los Montes Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
July 19,2001
Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 1509 Los Montes Drive
Dear Planning Commissioners:
On July 23,2OOl you will hold a public hearing regarding the application for design review and
hillside area construction permit for a new dwelling to be constructed at 1509 Los Montes Drive'
We are unable to attend this meeting and hope you will consider our concems in your
deliberations. If you need to contact us, we will be available after July 24,2001. Our telephone
number is 650-344-77 58.
We live at 1515 Los Montes Drive, which is adjacent to 1509. There are six houses in a row
on our side of the street all of similar construction and style - essentially splitJevel (because of the hill)
one-story, ranch type. 1509 is the second of these six houses and the proposed two-story, eight
bedroom structure almost in the middle of these six houses is totally out of character with the
neighborhood. We are enclosing two photographs - the one with two houses is 1509 on the left and our
house, 1515, on the right. The second picture is the house adjacent to ours on the north side - 1519.
All the other houses are of similar style.
Of more personal concem is the fact that construction of the structure at 1509 as proposed will
destroy the view hom our family room. We are enclosing a photograph taken from our family-roorry
looking out over our deck directly at the back of the property at 1509. The rooftop and back of 1509,
whichis one-story on our side, can be seen at the left. If the proposed structure is built - two-story and
extending another 20 or 30 feet to the right- and t'ra oristing fiees are removed, we will be looking at
the wall of a Uuilaing. Not only will we lose our view, but we fear that the sunlight that we now get in
our yard will be shaded by the new structure. Is it possible to have a story pole erected that would
show the height and dimensions of the proposed structure?
If there is some way to reduce the sheer mass of the proposed structure to be more in keeping
with the neighborhood ald protect our view, we would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours very truly,
RECEIVED
JUL 2 0 7001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
/ 1,,)*
i ITEU /lB - 1509 Los Montes
PC Meegine lO/22lOL
ITEi{ RECEIVED AFTER PREPARATIO
OF PACKET
Oc'tober 19, 2001
Re: 1509 Los Montes Drive
October 22, 200 1 Hearing
Honorable Planning Commissione,B,
As a neighbor to 1509 Los Montes Drive, I have had an opportunity to
review the new plans with the help of your diligent staff. Unficrtunately I will not
be able to attend the hearing as scheduled.
There is improvement with the plan over its predecessor, but it still does
not resolve my con@ms. The design I feel is still not compatible with the
neighbofiood. Wthin a half-a-block or more, it will be the only two-story home.
The new home will have a dominate presen@ in the area where the modest-
looking split-lwel houses has not changed much in appearance for years.
Although the appearanoe of the new home has been tone doam. lt could be less.
It is still too bulky. lt will also reduce sunlight to the areas across trom it and on
the northem+ide. Setting back the second levelfrom the font and northem-side
of the house will help. The new plan is an improvement, but not the solution to
my concems.
I hope the Board will preserve the neighborhood's character and make
changes to the Los Montes design in that vein. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely
Clint Gee
3109 Cananea Avenue RECEIVED
ocT 2 2 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
ftn'\
Item ll10 - 1509 Los Montes Avenue
DRS - PC meeting 7.2?3OLOF PACKET
California 94010
luly 20, 2001
Burlingame Planning Commission
Re: 1509 Los Montes Avenue
Dear Planning Commissioners,
Unfortunately I am unable to attend Tuesday night's meeting because of
prior commitmenB. I appreciate the opportunity to express my views by letter.
My concern with the project is whether it is compatible with the current
neighborhood. Last Thursday with the help of a staff member, I viewed the
plans to 1509 Los Montes. My impression is that the new house is not.
I was first struck by the size of the two-story house and the size of the
house berhg well over 4,ZN square feet. This will be one of the largest if not
the largest house in the neighborhood (and also one of the highest). Although
the staff member assured me the current plans confirm to the city guidelines, I
thought the new home would dominate our neighborhood of modest split-level
ranch style homes. The exterior appearance of the proposed house was I think
accefiable, but different from other homes in the area. It was hard to imagine
the horne from a one-dimensional drawing. The second story makes the house
look much larger when beside neighboring houses. The spacing between the
house and its neighbor on the north side will be reduced significantly (from the
staff membe/s account, about nine feet). With the cunent size and height of
the housg I believe it does not fit the neighborhood.
When I was shopping for new homes in Burlingame, I was attracted to
the neighborhood's feeling of openness and privacy and the simple well cared for
homes. The area in the hills is a different area than other parts of Burlingame
and that should be one of your considerations when approving the plans. I am
not opposed to any large homes in the area. What I fear is the approval of the
plan without a diligent effort to preserve the neighborhood's character. I rely on
your expeftise to accomplish the task of presering our neighborhood. Leb make
ceftain the plans are the best plans for the area. The current plans for the Los
Montes home, in my view are not. Thank you for your attenUon to the matter.
Respectfully,
Clinton Gee
I
{
U-=
Sentember 10, ?OO1
Iis. iiarga.ret J.ibnroe
Ci-t..r IrJ-ar:ner
501 t'rinrose RoadB'rrrlingane, 9L0tOCilifornia
Dear I'is. Il{onroe:
'!ie attended a meetins on Jul:r 2Jr 2OO1 r.rith ti:e planning comrnission regarrlingthe demolishing anC rebuildine of the home at f5O9 f,os }fontes Driver Burlinpnine.
h=e exnressed sel-era.I concerns rre irad and l,rould lil<e to express otirer concern.sto ;'ou.
h*e purchased our1rorne at t5O5 Los iriontc:s lJr"ive thirteen and a ha-1-f ye;:rs r-go,
we bought our hone in a neighborhood o-f attaohed garages. The idea of ira.rine er-
iraust fume.s coming directly into our ya.rd coneerns lls a great dea.l. since ne and ourpets are in +-he yard a. good part, of *.he time. ,Shou1d thi-s ca.use healtb probl.episwitir anrr of r:s, t'he City of -qur]ingarne -*i-11 cerLa.inlv be invo-l-ved in tiri-c matler,
We have already lived for tlre n:-.st thirteen vea.rs rith a serrer nro'l-.lerq frorn
anotller neigh.bor, their sreliraqe c:r.ne into our yard e.nd ruined plants, contauri_neted
our pool and caused our nets to get sick. Tle do not want to iiave nore problerns
rith drainage and exha.ust firmes vrit,h another neighbor.
Another concern uitir'birilrting a. n-e-rnr ]iome at 15Cq l,os },lorrtes I)r. i.s tiie p1.en
tci cut dorrn anothe:: treeo
Brrrlrng3;1e r-ras a.lways knov,nr astfThe City r:f Treesrr, r'rhv are a-1.1. the*"e con-
tractors able to cut so rnany tree-s dcrm in this Ci{r of Trees?
vie feel tira-t we are lositrg the uniqueness of Burlingarrre, this was our rea.sc)n
(ancl werre sure rnany otherts) for rnoving here, is tire almightv doJ.liir nore iraport-
ant then the cha.racter of this citrv?
ir"e hope y'ou and the planni.ng conmission rul1l take our coneerrrs into r:onsj-dera.-
tion, n'e certainl-;r 6o not rniant to face another ntunber of years with drai-nage :nr1
healtir problems that can be a.voi-ded, after al1 we did not move to thi-s ct-rrrr,rrrni tl'
just to nay irigh taxes.
Sincerely,
o ?u- (*y,
ireter Keves \?arnela rrr
lie are requestinq a replr to our e.oncerns,
ti'ris natter.
rhanlr -_vori ror ,r."" ""*;it dED
SEP 1 L ?SS1
''1'\R[*l:t'lt?tY'
!
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-725A
1509 rOS tdoNTES DRM
Application for design review and hillside
area construction permit for a new two-story
single family dwelling and detached garage at
1509 Los Mont.es Drive, zoned R-1.
(APN: 027-045-080)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Mondarr, ilulrr 23, 2001 at 7 : 00 p.IrI. in theCity HaIl Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed July 13 , 2OOL
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
ss8-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
CXia.tf(}N
'A
(Please refer to other side)
CE
-l
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRII\4ROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (65C) 558-7250
].509 LOS MONTES DRIVE
Application for design review and hillside
area consLruction permit for a new two-story
single family dwelling and deEached garage at
1509 Los Montes Drive, zoned R-1.
(APN: 027-045-080)
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Mondav, October 22, 2001 al 7200 P.M. in the
City '{e}1 Council Chambers located at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California-
Mailed October l-2, 2001
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame, C
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
1 Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
PU
Sta{A.r.tr(}
ffiffi
il*Lx&Sds.
J
(Please refer to other side)
CE
_l
1509 I.OS MONTES AVENUE
Application for design review and hillsj-de
.i"" "ot"truction permit for a new two-
story single farnily dwetling and detached
g"..-g" at L509 Los Montes Avenue, zoned R-
L. (APN: 027-045-080)
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
"rrrrorrr"L" the following public hearing on
Ttresday, @ al 1z0O P'M' in
ers lQcated at
501- Primrose Road, Burlingame, C'rlifornia'
Mailed November 2, 20OL
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (6s0) 558-7250
(Please refer to other side)
Acopy ofthe
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
I Primrose Road,
limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
CALIf(}xfA
(Please refer to other side)
CE
_l
I
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BUBLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
1509 LOS MONTES AVENUE
Application for design review and hillside
area construction perrnit for a new thro-
story single family dwelling and detached
grarage at l-509 Los Montes Avenue, zoned
R-1. (APN: 027-045-080)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
The City of Burlingame Planning Comnr-ission
announces the following public hearing on
Monday,Deeember 10, 2001 at 7:0O P.M. in
the City Hall Council Chambers located at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed November 30, 200L
(Pleusa refer ro other sidc)
Burlin game, Cal ifornia.
558-7250. Thank You
Margaret Montoe
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
QII'Y OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior
to the meeting at the Plannl,g Departnrent at 501 Primrose Road,
If you challenge the strbiect application(s) in court' you may'be limited to
,aising only th-ose issues yolr or someone else raised at.the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written cortespondenq.e.,{e1_ivered to the city
atorpriortothepublichearing..:..l;.1]..i.']l.i::,..
property owners who receive thiS qo1i9e are responsibleiorinforming their
renants about this notice. Forladditional information; please call (650)
\
(Please refer to other sicle)
-J
RESOLUTION APPROYING CATEGORICAL DGMPTION,
DESIGN REVIEWAIYD A HN,LSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PER]VIIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exernption has been proposed and application has been made for desien
review and a hillside area construction permit for a new two-story house with a detached garage at I 509 Los
Montes Drive. zoned R-I. Ron Grove. oroperty owner. APN: 027-045-080;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
December 10. 2001. at which time it reviewed and considered the staffreport and all ottrer written materials
and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLYED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
L On the basis of the kritial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and commerts
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a sigtificant efrect on the environmen! and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303- Class 3- construction and location of limited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences mt in conjunction with
the building of two or more zuch units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be
coNtructed or cotrverted under this exemption.
2. Said desip review and hillside area construction permit are approved, zubject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A' attached hereto. Findings for the design review and hillside area construction permit are as set
forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3 . It is further directed that a certified copy ofthis resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Joseoh Bojuds -, Secretary of the Planning Commission ofthe City ofBurlingame, do hereby crrtify
that tle foregoing resolution was intoduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the fftL tlay of December. 2001 . by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
I
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
I
EXHIBIT NAX
Conditions of approval for design review and hillside area consfruction permit
1509 Los Montes Drive
effective January 7, 2002
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans zubmitted to the Planning Departnent
date stamped November 30, 2001, sheets Al, A4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,2001,
sheets A2 and A3, and date stamped October 12, 2001, sheet A7, and that any changes to the
fooprint or floor area of the building shall require and ame,n&nent to this permit;
that any changes to the size or envelope ofthe basement, first or second floors, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roofheight or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
that the conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief
Building Official's May 7, ?-001, memos shall be met;
that the dimemions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l'-0" x 21'4";
that the 4 existing redwood Eees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing
bay ree at the left side of the property shall remain after construction;
that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling
ordinance recently approved by the City Council; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and
California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
l.
that no fence or other permanent struch[e shall be eretted in the 5'-0" public sewer
easement located at the rear of the property;
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
i\.
j,
,'
I
Lr
t l: -' --..:
f'
t' ,.:
:
n-i
t.:
\t: '.
:.ii'x ,.
,l) j
1{;
.t':\'-/ !
{.'
/r'.'
f
.f
li
.Jii
$
I
I
.9.,:
C
ri
!t.:
'al
d"
Ir.qr
?,"i
1t,
"l'
,
\it,"'
'' ii",
:,
\
t
RESOLUTIONNO.
RESOLUTION APPROYING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
DESIGN REVTEW AIYD A HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
RESOLVED by the cmY couNCIL of rhe ciry of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desigrr
for a new two-story house with a detached earaee at ljgglos Montes Drive. zoned R-I. Ron Grove. oropertv owner. ApN: 027-045-0g0.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on lecembq11q
2001. at which time said application was3tBNyED;
WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council- and a hearing thereon held on February 4.
2002 - at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and alf other written -utoia. *a
testimony presented at said hearing -.- i .,
NOW, TIIEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that theproject set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, perCEQAArticlelg. CategoricallyExemptperSection:15303-Class3-constructionandlocationoflimited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with
the building of two or more such units. In urbanizedareas, up to three single-family residinces may beconstructed or converted under this exemption.
- : Said design review and hillside area construction permit are approved, subject to the conditions setforth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for the design revi"w *d hillside area construction permit
are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby qertiff that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe City Council held on ttre +'a aai of February. i002 .
and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
I
2.
3
EXHIBIT ''A''
Conditions of approval for design review and hillside area construction permit
1509 LOS MONTES DRIVE
effective FEBRUARY 4, 2002
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent date
stampedNovember 30,200l,sheets Al, ,{4 and Ll, and date stamped October 3,z}Ol,sheets A2
and A3, and date stamped October 12,2001 , sheet A7, and that any changes to the footprint or floor
area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;
that any changes to the size or envelope of the basemen! first or second floors, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
that the*qnditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building
Official's May 7, 200l,memos shall be met;
that the dimensions of the proposed detached garage shall be 2l'-0" x2l'-0,,;
that the 4 existing redwood trees at the rear right corner of the property and the I existing bay tuee
at the left side of the property shall remain after construction;
that no fence or other permanent strucfure shall be erected in the 5'-0" public sewer easement
located at the rear of the property;
that the project shall comply with the proposed demolition and construction recycling ordinance
recently approved by the City Council; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements ofthe Catifornia Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burliryame.
4.
5.
6.
7
8
(
C]TY OF BUBLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BUHLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 5s8-7250
1509 r-os I'loNTEs DRrvE
Appea1 of a Planning Conunission approval
of an application for design review and
hillside area construction permit for a
new, two-story single family dwelling and
detached garage at 1509 Los Montes Drive,
zoned R-1. (APN: 027-045-080)
The City of Burlingame City Council
announces the following public hearing on
Monday, Eebruary 4, 2OO2 at 7:0O P.M. in
-the City Hall Council Chambers loeated at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed .fanuary 25, 2002
(Please rekr to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy ofthe
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
-t
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
cArtro !tte.
(Please refer to other side)
CE
I
1509 I/oS t{ON:rEs DRfvE
Appeal of a Planning Commission approval
oi- "., application for desi-gn review and
hillside area construction permit for a
new, two-story singl-e family dwelling and
detached garage at L509 Los Montes Drive'
zoned R-l-- (APN: 027-045-080)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94OIO
TEL: (650) s5$'725o
The CitY of Burlingame CitY Councj-l
announces the following Public heari-ng on
20, 2OO2 at 7:OO P.U.
in the City ttatt Council Chambers located
at 50L Pri-mrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
Mailed FebruarY 8, 2OO2
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior
PropertY
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed Prior
Primrose Road,
limited to
hearing,
to the citY
their
call (650)
!
PU
:ffi :'tTAi_ts'$d11
(Please refer to other side)
CE
-{
I
f'city Councit
Xcity Mrnog"r'
'Kcity Attomeyl^. -., Ulr. FIIlAllC€
f,city Planner
r, Dir. Public Works
! Human Resources.l Police Chief
X Fire Chief
! Parks & Rec
I Librarian
please respond
ir No Required
p on Next esenda
J. Frederick Smith
Susan S. Smith
l5l5 Los Montes Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
RECEIVED
.lAN 0'i 2002
g,'#gFffiiftEl,fiE
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR
RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL:
PLEASE SET A HEARING FOR
THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL
FOR 1509 LOS MONTES FOR
FEBRUARY 4, 2002.
January 7,2002
City Clerk
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
ANN MUSSO, CITY CLERK
Dear City Clerk:
We would like to appeal to the City Council the decision of the Planning Commission on
December 10,2001 relative to the property located at 1509 Los Montes Drive, Burlingame,.
Enclosed is our check in the amount of $250 to cover the appeals fee.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours very
/ g;d-
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SI]BlVtrTTED
JANU ARY 25.
AGENDA 5DITEM #
MTG.
DATE z(zolor-,
TO:
DATE:
BY
BY
APPROYED
FROM:CITY PLANNER
SI,BIECT: NEGATIVE DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AND REZONING FROM
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R.1) TO DUPLEX RESTDENTTAL (R-2) FOR ErGHT
PROPERTIES WITH REQUES T MODIT"YING APPLICATION TO TWO PROPERTIES,
1224 AND 122611228 PALOMA AVENUE, FOLLOWTNG PLANNTNG COMMTSSTON
DENIAL OF REZONING REQUES T FOR PROPERTmS oN PALOMA, LAGUNA ANn
CAPUCHINO AVENUES.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should hold a public hearing at which you should consider. (l), the request for lelning; (2), the
applicants modifrcation to tire request for-rezoning, (3;, the General Plan amendment; and (a) the Negative
Declaration which addresses both the rezoning uri G.r.rul Plan amendment. In the case of a General Plan
amendment and/or rezoning the planning Commission's action is a recommendation. Action should be by
resolution. At the end of this staffrepori are a series of questions prepared by the City Attorney to guide you
in your deliberation. Choices of Council action are.
o After identifuing the area to be rezoned, approve by adopting a resolution for the rezoning
and General plan amendment which includes stating your reasons for approval and find that
the Negative Declaration is adequate and the action will not cause any significant (negative)
environmental effects;
. Deny, stating your reasons, the request for rezoning and General Plan amendment' do not act
on the Negative Declaration,
o If the information is inadequate for Council members to make a decision or the Council
wishes to add properties tothe area to be rezoned which are beyond the eight considered in
the Negative declaration and by the Planning Commission,. this item could be referred back
to the ilanning Commission. Should Council decide send the item back to the Commission,
direction to the Commission and staff should be clear about what additional information is
needed to determine or define the issue'
Rezoning requires the adoption of an ordinance. Once Council has acted on the Negative Declaration and
General plan amendment and determined the appropriate zoning action, if the action is a change to the
zoning, staffwill prepare an ordinance to codiff the zoning change for Council action at a subsequent
meetiig. Action o1u G.n"ral Plan amendment is formalized by adoption of a resolution.
Planning Commission Action
At their ireeting on November 13, z}oz,the Planning Commission was asked to consider rezoning eight
parcels, all of which presently lie between the properties parallel to Broadway which are zoned R-3 and R-1.
The request is to establish a transition zone of duplex use between the existing high density and low density
Negative Declaration, General plan Amendment and Rezoning from single Family Residential to Duplex
Residential (k2) for Eight properties ith R"qurrt Moitifying Applicatiltn to Two Properties 1224 anil
1226/122g paloma Avenue Following planning commisiionbenial of Rezoning Requeltlor Properties on
Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues. February 4' 2002
residential uses. The planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-0-l (C' Osterling-absent) to
deny the request. The reasoni for their action expressed by the c-ommission were: do not know how these
parcels were chosen, but do not think the parcels on capuchino should be included because this area is already
impacted by parking from the ola", *uttipie family dwelopment which is
-
R-3 zoning on El camino as well
as from that along Broadway; understand that to make thisihange we need a pattern, not a spot, but we need
to protect this neighborhood; cannot support this change because-it would have a negative impact on the
neighborhood, there must be some creatirr. *uy other ihan rezoning to assistlhis applicant; properties on
capuchino should be eliminated, perhaps the rezoning can be limited to the four properties on Paloma, single
family residential values can be uff..trd if residents ii duplexes use their on site parking for storage and park
on the street or ifboth units are renter occupied; problem ihis request is addressing began 20 years ago, the
city continues to change, the development ;f tra;sit corridors on the Peninsula will make a greater impact on
housing and Broadway is a typical transit center/corridor, it is the natural evolution of cities that the density in
this area close to shopping, pedestrian activity, transportation will increase, the ultimate fate ofBroadway is
more urban and less rUuiUu", it is just not time for itris to happen yet; Planning Commission represents the
values of the community and while the state has mandated thaf the city find place for additional housing, this
is not the location at this time, feel that R-l zoning is probably appropriate for this location in these special
circumstances. commissioners noted that four lois might be considered to create an adequate transition
zoning unit.
BACKGROUND:
Jerry Deal, applicant and owner of the property at 122611228 Paloma Avenue developed with a
nonconforming duplex, is requesting the rironing of the properties at 1224 and 122611228 Paloma Avenue
from R-l, single family, to R-2, duplex In ordei to change the zoning the following are required:
o Determination that the area (two parcels) being requested for a change in zoning is suffrciently
large to create a meaningful and etonomically ,iable transit]o3 in land use and not a special
priril"gr. (See City Atto:rney's Memo General Planning andZoningof Selected Parcels,
lanuar! zd, zoozl'on examination of the project, Council may define "transition" area from
two to eight Parcels.
o Determination that the proposed change, as defined by City Council, is consistent with the land
use goals and policier of ttr" General ilan and define an amendment to the land use map of the
gerrJral plan to document the determination of transition area (See attached Land Use Element
Goals and Policies);
o Determination that there are no significant or potentially significant environmental changes
caused in the area selected by either the rezoning or the amendment of the general plan; and
that the Negative Declarationprepared adequately evaJuates and discloses that there would be
no significant (negative) envirbnmental effect caused by this change in land use and zoning-
(See Negative Declaration Attached)
When the applicant made his original request to the Planning Commission, it\1as for the rezoning and a
general plan amendment for 8 picels bordering the area zoned R-3 paratlel to Broadway (1224,122611228
Iato*a; 1225 and1z29 paloma; l2z5 and l}ZiLagana; and 1224 and 1228 Capuchino). This was the request
7
Negative Declaration, General Plan Amend.ment and Rezoning from Single Fumily Resid.ential to Duplex
Reiidential (R-2) foi Eight Properties with Request Modifying Applicatigl to Two hoperties, 1224 and
1226/122g palomaAveiue, Foilowing Planning Commission Denial of Rezoning Requestfor Properties
onPaloma"Lagunaandiapuchinoivenues- Febraary 4' 2002
on which the planning Commission held a public hearing and on which they acted when they recommended
denial of this application.
In the planning Commission's review and recommendation (see Planning Commission Action) they noted
that they thought that the properties at 1224 and 1228 Capuchino Avenue should not be included because of
the serious impact the change to R-2 zoning would have on this edge of the existing single family zoned atea
and because older multiple-family development with less on site parking than required today in areas zoned
R-3 already impact these single family houses on two sides reducing on street parking and increasing traffic.
Commission suggested that perhaps rezoning of four of the proposed eight pro-Perties might be sufficient to
create a meaninl}ul 'transidoi' ionebetween the multiple family and single family ilreas. They did not
identi$ which four properties might be most appropriate.
The Negative Declaration addresses the impacts of the rezoning of the eight properties, and would cover the
selection of fewer than 8 properties as well. In the analysis of the 8 properties the Negative Declaration
discloses that of the s partek, 6 are developed with single family houses, one is developed with a duplex
(ly46/l11Spaloma) and one is developed with a four unit apartment building (1225 Laguna). If all were
ieveloped with twounits there would be a net increase of six new dwellings in the areq assuming that the
four-plex was not removed and the remaining single family units were all developed as duplexes. Should the
four-ple* loose its nonconforming status and be replaced with a conforming duplex, the net addition of
dweliing units on the 8 parcels would be 4. It was determined that since redevelopment of these parcels would
requirelarking to codeiequirements on site and that the public facilities in place in the area have suffrcient
capacity to acJommodate 6 additional dwelling units, that there would not be a significant (negative) effect on
the environment caused by infill development resulting from changing the zoning on these 8 parcels. This
finding would hold if the zonitgwere to be changed from R-l to R-2 on fewer than 8 of these parcels as well.
StaffComment
planning Staffwould note that while the request being made is for a rezoning of existing properties the real
issue is one of land use. The planning law ioes not allow the creation of "spots" of different land use which
are not viable within areas. Fbr example, the designation of a single parcel commercial in the middle of a
single family residential subdivision. If ttre neigh6orhood being established needed commercial services to be
viable undei city policy, the opportunity should be vested in a suffrcient number of properties so that the
commercial areacreatid *orld b" economically viable and competitive for the benefit of the entire
neighborhood or area and community.
At issue in this application is what is an "inconsistent" land use; or how many parcels does it take to make the
land use viable in its designated function. We do not have a city policy which defines this. Whatever the
decision on this request it *iU become the foundation for the city's policy on viability. It will be cited by
other property owners elsewhere in the city who want to change the zoning on their properties'
In this case the proposed function of the R-2 zoning is to create atransition between the multiple family area
to the south unO tt "
R-l area to the north: to reduce the impacts of the land development standards which
allow more mass, bulk and intensity of use on multiple family zoned land compared to single family zoned
land. The General plan establishes that it is appropriate to use the R-2 zone for transitions between areas
developed for multiple family and single family uses. The issue then becomes, at this locatiorq how many
parcels are needed to create an effective transition between the existing multiple family and single family
3
Negative Declars.tion, General Plan Amendment and Rezoning from Single Fumily Residential to Duplex
neiidential (R-2) for Eight hoperties with Request Modifying Application to Two Propefiies 1224 und
1226/122g paloma Avenue Foliowing Planning Cornmission Denial of Rezoning Requestfor Properties on
Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues. February 4, 2002
development. The applicant is proposing that two parcels side by side on the east side of Paloma adjacent to
the R-i zoned parceli is sufficient. The Planning Commission recommended that in this area as few as 4
contiguous of the 8 identified parcels might be sufficient.
A number of neighbors, on parcels currently zoned R-l and developed with single family houses, testified in
opposition at the planning Commission public hearing. They noted that the area was already impacted by
.*irtlrg multiple family development which was built at a time when on-site parking requirements were less
(one per unit). In addiiion the employees and shoppers on Broadway uses these streets closest to the
commercial area for parking during the day; and current homeowners and over-flow multiple family tenants'
cars fill the streets at night. The note that the area cannot take any more parking or the one way streets any
more traffic.
In his memo on General Plan and Zoningof Selected Parcels, January 29,2002 (attached) the City Attorney
suggests that Council consider the following questions for applications for changes to zoning of specific
parcels:
1. Is the proposed reclassification and rezoning consistent with the City's General Plan?
Z. Does the proposed reclassification and rezoning advance the purposes and policies of the City's
General Plan?
-J Is the proposed reclassification and rezoning for the benefit of the community as a whole as well as
the surrounding area or is it only for the benefit of the particular landowner(s) involved?
4. Is the area of the proposed reclassification and rezoning not so small that it would clearly bear no
relationship to an overall plan or program?
Are the proposed uses under the reclassification and rezoning not so different or disruptive to the
prevailing uses of the area that they would adversely affect those other uses and perhaps frustrate
policies or goals of the City's General Plan and the Zotring Code?
5
ATTACHMENTS:
Larry Anderson Memo, General Planning and Zoning of Selected Parcels, January 29,2002
poliiy plan Section, Burlingame General Plan, includes goals and policies of all elements of the General Plan
Monroe letter, January 24,2002, to Jerry Deal, setting public hearing
Jerry Deal letter to City Council, November 19, 2007, requesting hearing on revised project
Jerry Deal letter to Planning Commission, August 9,2001, supporting his rezoning request
Planning Commission Minutes November 13,2001
Susan Ronnow, 1232 Capuchino, letter November 13, 2001
Alene Meyer, 1228 Capuchino, letter November 12,2001
Elisa Odabashian, 1236 Paloma, letter November 12, 2001
4
Negative Declaration, General Plan Amcndment and Rezoningfrom Single Family Residential to Duplex
Residcntial (R-2) for Eight hoperties with Request Modifying Application to Two hoperties, 1224 and
1226/1228 Paloma Avenue, Following Planning Commission Denial of Rezoning Requestfor Properties
on Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues. February 4, 2002
Ash McNeely, 1236 Paloma Avenue, letter November 12,2001
Jerry Deal letter November 9, 200I, to his neighbors
Susan and Alan Bonkowski, 1304 Lincoln, letter November 12,2001 with petition, 99 signatures
John Brosnan, letter November 10, 2001
Ronald and Linda Field, 1249 Paloma, letter November 9,2001
Betty Woll Mark Zuckerman,1233 Lagtna,letter November 4, 2001, to Planning Commission/City Council
Planning Commission StaffReport, November 13, 2001, with attachments
Negative Declaration, October 12, 2001
Aerial Photograph, Revised Rezoning Proposal, November 2001
Map 1: Existing Original Zoning and Revised Rezoning Proposal for a Transition R-2 Zone on the North Side
of Broadway, January 2002.
Resolution, to be adjusted pending City Council decision
Notice of Public Hearing, mailed January 25,2002
5
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF'BURLINGAME
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: January 29,2002
TO:Mayor and Council
FROM: Izlrry E. Anderson, CityAttorney
General Planning and Zontng of Selected Parcels
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide rh6Touncil with a basic background on Califomia
and generic legal considerations in reviewing a land use amendment that would affect a small
number of parcels.
DISCUSSION
Land use regulation in Califomia is summarizedin a 1929 car,e
[E]nactrnent by a municipality of an ordinance pursuant to a general comprehensive zoning
plan, based upon considerations of public health, safety, morals, or the general welfare,
applied fairly and impartially, which ordinance regulates, reshicts, and segregates the
location of the industries, the several classes ofbusiness, trade, or calling, and the location
of apartment or tenement houses, clubhouses, club residences, and the several classes of
public and semi-public buildings, is a valid exercise of the police power and is not in
contravention of the firndamental law nf +trt t1"1t.
Wickham vs. Becker (1929) 96 Cal.App . M3, 446 [27 4 P . 3971.
When one or a few parcels ofproperty are singled out by an ordinance for treatment that is different
fromtheadjacentproperties, questionsimmediatelyariseastowhetherthatordinancemaybeinvalid
or unconstitutional.
It is important to note at the outset that simply labeling azoringaction as "spot zoning" does not end
ttre inquiry. "Spot zoning" may or may not be proper; it depends on the circumstances of each
proposal. City and County ofSan Franciscovs. Bullock(1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 1738 [58 Cal.Rptr.2d
4821.
"Spot zoning" can involve either less favorable treatment - more onerous restrictions - than
surrounding property, or more favorable treatrnent - allowing more intensive or different use - than
surrounding property.
RE:
1 Mayor and Council
Re: General Planning andZorungof Selected Parcels
January 29,2002
Page2
Most Californiacases describing "spotzoning" involve ordinances thatwouldhave imposed greater
restrictions, such as open space or low density, on aparcel or a few parcels than on the surrounding
area; these cases are based on inverse condemnation challenges. See Ross vs. City of Yorba Linda
(1991) 1 Cal.App. 4th 954 [2 Cal.Rptr .2d 6387; Hein vs. City of Daly City (1958) 165 Cal.App.2d
4ot 1332P.2d1201.
The few California cases involving a grant ofmore favorable treatment involve legislative discretion.
Insafeway Stores vs. City Council of City of San Mateo (1948) 86 Cal.App.2d277,284U94P.2d
7201, astore chain contended that the Cityhad to allow it special heatrrent to locate a new store in
the residential district at the comer of San Mateo Drive and Poplar Avenue; the court disagreed,
finding that "it is not sufficient for him to show that it will be more profitable to him to make other
use of his property, or that such other use will not cause injury to the public, but he must show an
abuse of discretion on the part of the zoning authorities and that there has been an unreasonable
exercise ofthe police power." The court deferred to San Mateo City Council's denial of Safeway's
rezoning. See also Wilkins vs. City of San Bernardino (1946) 29 Cal.2d 332 ll7 5 P .2d 5A\
The standard that is generally accepted in the United States for "spot zoning" review is stated in 8
McQuillan, The Law of Municipal Corporations (3'd ed. 2000) $ 25.83 [formatting changed for
readabilityl:
Four factors are elements in any test of whether a zoning classification of a specific parcel
of land is unconstitutional spot zoning under the constitution:
(1) whether the use of the parcel is very different from the prevailing use of other parcels
in the area;
(2) whether the area of the parcel [or parcels] is small;
(3) whether the classification is for the benefit of the community or only for the particular
landowner; and
(4) whether the change in the zoning classification complies with the municipality's plan.
Comprehensive planning through an adopted General Plan and the adoption of the implementing
zoningdishictboundariesnecessarilyinvolvesminimizing "inconveniences" and adverse effects on
nearbyproperty. Concem has to be glven to erosion of zoning boundaries that would lead to "an end
to the effectiveness of all zoning legislation." Wilkins, supra, at342.
The order of factors found n McQuillan should probably be reversed. The key and overriding issue
is whether the proposed rezoning is consistent with and will advance the goals of the City's General
Mayor and Council
Re: General Planning and Zoning of Selected Parcels
January 29,2002
Page 3
Plan * and further whether it pays due regard for the welfare of the whole community. See SAYE
vs. City of Bothell (Wash.S.Ct. l97S) 576 P.zd 401, 4051' Bossman vs. Village of Riverton
(Ill.App.Ct.1997) 684N.E.2d 427,431;Kimballvs. Court of Common Council of Ctty of Meridien
(Conn. S.Ct.ofErrors 1961) 167 A.2d706,708;North Shore Beach Property Owners Ass'nvs. Town
of Brookhaven (N.Y.S.Ct. 1954) 129N.Y.S.2i697,700. Californiacaseshavealsostruckdown
limited parcel zoning when it appears to create a monopoly for a particular property owner. See In
re White (1925) 195 Cal. 516 [Town of Atherton].
The neighboring property owners and the community as a whole have an enforceable right to have
the General Plan and the zoning ordinances applied in a non-arbihary and fair manner. See SAYE,
supra. However, they do not necessarily have a vested right to the maintenance of existing
restrictions; "[t]he crty has the right to modify its zoning regulations from time to time." Case vs.
City of Los Angeles (1956) 142 Cal.App.2d 66,69 1298 P.2d 501.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the Council consider applications for changes to the zoning of specific
parcels by reviewing the following questions:
A. Is the proposed reclassification and rezoning consistent with the City's General Plan?
[Please remember that amendments to a particular part ofthe General Plan have to be consistent with
the rest of the General Plan.]
B. Does the proposed reclassification and rezoning advance the purposes and policies of the
City's General Plan?
C. Is the proposed reclassification and rezoning for the benefit ofthe community as a whole
as well as the surrounding area or is it only for the benefit of the particular landowner(s) involved?
D. Is the area ofthe proposed reclassification and rezoning not so small that it would clearly
bear no relationship to an overall plan or program?
E. Are the proposed uses under the reclassification and rezoning not so different or
disruptive to the prevailing uses of the area that they would adversely affect those other uses and
perhaps frustrate policies or goals of the City's General Plan and the Zoning Code?
If the Council finds that an application for areclassification and rezoning meets these tests, then the
Council can proceed with the additional issues regarding whether the proposed reclassification and
rezoning is "good planning" and "good policy," which is entirely within the Council's discretion.
POLICYPLAN
GENERALGOALS
COMMT]NITY GOALS
Goals for Burlingame will be meaningful only if they relate realistically to the powers and
resources of the citizens and the City government. Community goals must also relate to the
larger forces at work at national, state and regional levels that are giving shape to our economy
and institutions and affecting the quality of our environment. And, most specifically, goals for
Brnlingame must be related to the forces at work in the San Francisco Bay Area Since
Bulingame has little or no control over the many extemal forces that wi[ influence its future, it
is necessary to identifr some of the more significant general conditions that appear likely to
prevail in the futrue. If actual conditions prove to be different than those assumed, it will be
necessary for the City to re-evaluate its goals and objectives.
ASST]MPTIONS
California and the Bay Area will continue to experience an increase in total
population and a changing composition of population, with increasing percentages
of senior citizens and non-wtrites, a decreasing percentage of young people,
smaller households, and increasing levels of educational attairunent.
2.In the Nation, State, and Bay Area there will be a continuing increase in the
production of goods and services and in the average productivity per worker,
resulting in a continuing rise of real income and a broader distribution thereof
amongthe population.
There will be continued decline in the number of hours per average work week
and in the average annual hours of labor per worker, resulting in increased leisrne
and thus more time for recreational activities for many people.
The residents of Califomia and the Bay Area will demand greater convenience
and amenity from their residential wsking, and recreational areas.
NATIONAL GOALS
The paramount goal of the United States was set long ago. It is to guard the rights
of the individuat, to ensure his development and to enlarge his opportunity . . .
Our enduring aim is to'build a nation and help build a world in which every
human shalt be free to develop his capacities to the fullest.t
lThe Rc,port of the hesident's Commission on National Goals, Goals for Americans, 1960.
I
3
4.
I
-,-
City of Burlingame PP-2 General Plan
These words from the Report of the President's Commission onNational Goals provide a basic
context within which community goals can be developed.
]
POLICYPLAN
GENERALGOALS
GEI\TERAL GOALS
The goals included below are very general in nattne. They are intended to reflect basic aims of
the majority of citizens. Most people have a general goal of "ttre good life" or "ttre better life".
These terms, of course, mean different things to different people, and even in a community the
size of Burlingame there is a diversity of individual goals requiring a variety of opportunities,
facilities, and services. Providing forthe differing needs and aspirations of the people of the City
will require compromise and allocation of resources.
Economic expansion and ahigher level of real income.
Educational, cultural, and aesthetic advancement.
Beffemrent of social, institutional, and governmental relationships.
Improvement of the physical environment facilities, and services for living.
Ma:<imum freedom of choice for individuals consistent with the attainment of
other goals.
The following statements reflect our current understanding of the goals of the people of
Burlingame for their City:
Assure that Burlingame will continue to be a'\nell-rorurded'City with residences,
schools, business, industy, and space and facilities for social, recreational and
cultural activities.
Maintain and entrance the identity of the City and encowage a manimum sense of
identification by residents with the City.
)
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
)COMMT'NITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
Maintain and strengthen local sources of revenue to enable the City to continue.to
provide services and facilities at present or improved levels without increasing
local tax rates.
Maintain and improve the quality of the environment to preserve the public healtlt
and enhance the prospects for enjoyment by residents and visitors.
Enhance the local economy and the prospects for economic well being for all
residents.
These are very general goals and, if they are to be effective as policy guides, more specific
objectives must stem from them. The more specific objectives should then lead to action
City of Burlingamc PP.3 General Plan
' ia -)
]
POLICY PLAN
i
GENERAL GOALS
programs to be undertaken by the City and by residents, land owners, business establisbments,
and organizations representing various interest groups in the City.
Under subsequent headings implementing objectives are linked to each general goal. These
statements of commudty development goals and implementing objectives focus on physical
development - land use, public facilities and services, and circulation.
GOALS AND IMPLEMENTING OBJECTTYES
I. Goal: To assure that Burlingame will continue to be a "well-rounded" city with residences,
schools, business, industry, and space and facilities for social, recreational and cultural activities.
Implementing Objectives
a - Maintain or increase the variety_in uses of land in the City.
Maintain a variety of sites differing in size and location suitable for a wide range
of activities.
Encourage assembly of small lots in suitable locations to provide larger sites for
apartnents, omce buildings, and commercial enterprises.
Encourage the establishment ofbusinesses, professional olfices and
institutions to serve residents.
Keep codes and standards free of arbitrary or obsolete provisions that would
tend to inhibit conshuction of sound buildings in suitable locations to house a
variety ofuses.
Provide for and accommodate a range of types of transportation fecilities,
public and private, to meet the diverse needs ofthe various segments ofthe
population and business enterprises.
Provide a wide range of public facilities and services (parks, cultural facilities,
utilities, schools, etc.) to serve residents and business enterprises.
II. Goal: To maintain and enhance the identity of the City and encourage a maximum sense
of identification by residents with the City.
Implementing Objectives
Maintain and enhance rational relationships among frrnctional parts ofthe
City (residential areas, business dishicts, indushial areas, public areas,
tra$portation, etc.).
b
c.
d.
e.
f.
a.
City of Burlingame PP.4 General Plan
j
POLICYPLAN
GENERALGOALS
Provide improved connections (vehicular and pedesrian) for portions of City
now isolated by barriers, a.E , railroads, freeways.
Establish a pattem of dominance and subordination in important visual
features; create hamrony with diversity.
Create distinctive visual qualities - a Burlingame image (analyze existing visual
qualities and build on the best of these).
Develop identiffing features at entrances to the commrmity and at focal points;
encourage cons&uction of buildings adequate in scale and heightto provide
identiffing elements.
Use trees of appropriate size and character as a design franiework to enhance a
sense of identity.
g. Use "street furniture" distinctive in design and color.
III. GoaI: To maintain and strengthen local sources of revenue to enable the City to continue
to provide services and facilities at present or improved levels without increasing local tax rates.
Implementin g Obiectives
a Maintain reasonable balance between those land uses providing highta>(
revenue and low service costs, and those uses with high service costs and low
revenue yield.
b. Require quality and permanence in site improvements and land development
projects to minimize depreciation.
c. Require forward-looking design to minimize obsolescence.
d. -. Encourage sound constmction and good maintenance for all buildings.
e.Enhance land values and economic by providing efficient
connections between functional parts of the City and good access to land to
permit development of uses appropriate in type and intensity without undue
congestion.
W. GoaI: To maintain and improve the quality of the environment to preserve the public
health and enhance the prospects for -enrjoyment by residents and visitors.
Umplementing Objectives
a.Insure levels of air quality compatible with the preservation of public healtb
including prevention of initation to the serxies, interference with visibility, and
damage to vegetation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
,.)
City of Burlingamc PP.5 Gcneral Plan
)
3
GENERALGOALS
b. Maintain and improve the quatity of water in San Francisco Bay and in the
streams flowing tluough the CitY.
Maintain the pleasant appearance prevailing in most of tlre Crty's residential
areas and improve the visual quallty in areas of less satisfactory appearance.
Improve the visual quatity of commercial and industrial ar€as with particular
attention to the Central Business District, Broadway, and the industrial areas
viewed from major highwaYs.
e.Protect the citizens of the community against excessive noise-
f. Assure opportunities for privacy in places of residence, work, and business, and
for leisure pursuits.
gi. Provide or encoumge the provision of places of meeting for social anri cultural
interchange and the purzuit of group objectives-
V. GoaI: To enhance the local economy and the prospects for economic well being for all
residents.
Implementing Obiectives
a. Take full advantage of Burlingame's strategic location, close to the regional
center of the San Francisco Bay Area, adjacent to the International Airport, and on
the major traffic routes linking San Francisco with other parts of the State.
Improve the functional efficiency and safety of the circulation system.
Minimize disruptive effects of vehicularmoyement onthe community (noise,
air pollution, vibration, glare, congestion)
Improve the functional efficiency, character and quality of the Central and
other business districts.
Provide an effective transition between retail commercial and residential uses
to shengthenthe residential character of the city.
1rI. Goal: To encourage mixed commercial uses to provide a transition between districts fully
commercial or residential and to provide housing opportunities for those dependent on transit and
desiring a pedestrian-oriented living environment-
c.
d.
b.
c.
d.
e.
,
City of Burlingame PP-6 General Plan
I
POLICYPII\N
POLICIES AT.IDACTIONS
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
LAND USE ELEMENT
The following land use policies and action statements are summarized from the Land Use
Elenrent adopted by Resolution 87-69,October 2A,1969. The summary of land use policies aod
actions as stated here have not been adopted by the city council and should be used for reference
only. For a full statement of the Land Use Policies see the Land Use Element, page L-l and
following.
POLICIES AIYD ACTION:
Poticy L(A): Ir,,recoguition of its special locational advantages of good access to_all forms
of transportation and pro-imity to the major downtown area high density,
multi-story residential land use shall be encouraged.
,"3
Action
L(t):
Action:
L(a):
High density residential uses shall be located in the area norttrwest of the
Burlingame Avenue-Park Road shopping center.
Require thatpresent zoning be maintainedto ensure protection forthe useful life
of the dwellings.
)Policy L(B): In many instances to provide a transition between higher intensity uses and
adioining lower intensity uses, medium high density residential uses of two to
three story apartment buildings, and in some cases higher buildings, are
appropriate as follows
Action
LQ):As a part of the complex of activities arormd the Btrlingame Plazaarea and
arotrnd the periphery of the Burlingarne Avenue-Park Road center there should be
nrediurr high density residential uses.
L(3): The frontage along most of El Carnino Real.
Policy L(C): Medium density residential areas would be occupied in the main by duplexes
and one and two story garden apartment developments.
Policy L@): For the most part existing low density residential areas occupy the remainder
of the city and arewell maintained and of good quality.
City of Burlingarne PP-7 General Plan
' .-)
POLICY PI.AIII
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
Policy L@): Provide for institutional uses including civic buildings' public schools,
private schools, churches, and other quasi-public and private institutions.
Any new institutional uses serving city-wide or larger areas should be lscated on
arterial streets and preferably adjacent to commercial centers.
L(6):
L(7):
L(8):
Institutional uses serving a sub-unit ofthe City should be located on an arterial or
collector street and in a location providing ready access to the area served.
The city should establish a new zoning district to apply to all sites on which there
are institutional or public uses.
The regulations for institutional uses should pennit the continuance of existing
uses and prohibit changes in use witho# City authorizatioru permitting the City to
take appropriate action to ensure that potential sites for parks and buildings
suitable for public assembly are not lost to public use.
PoIiry L@): The City residents are served by three classes of parks and open space:
community parks, neighborhood parks and prr$erves.
Action:
L(e):
L(r0):Provide a park strip around the Anza Airport Park indushial subdMsiog an
easement should be acquired to provide for public walks along the Bay side ofthe
property and provide for a pedestrian crossing ofthe arterial road proposed along
the bayfront between the City's park and the waters ofthe Bay.
L(ll):New neighborhood parks are recommended in the following general locations: in
the Easton drive area between Bemal Avenue and El Camino Real: in the Mlls
Estate area north ofTrousdale Drive between Sebastian Drive and Ashton
Avenue; in the area between Carolan Avenue and Bayshore Boulevard north of
Oak Grove Avenue; south of Cannelita Avenue near Paloma Avenue,; and the
Pershing School site; the city strould acquire individual lots where they become
available in these general areas.
L(r2):Augment the small sites of many ofthe existing aeighborhood parks and
elementary schools by acquisition of adjoining lots whenever available; close very
short sections of streets to augment sites or to link schools and parks together.
City of Burlingamc PP-8 General Plan
Action:
L(s):
Increase and preserve op€n space by adding lands on the southwest side of Mills
Creek to Mills Park or acquire a scenic easement to protect existing vegetation in
this canyon.
POLICYPI,AN
POLICIES AI{DACTIONS
policy'L(G): The City should retain three general categories of commercial uses:
Shopping and Service, Serice and Special Sales, and Oflice Use; as well as
Waterfront Commercial along the waterfront area.
Action:
L(13):
l. the visual character of the shopping center should be improved; and
2.the parking area serving the shopping center needs redesign and tree
planting to improve functional efficiency and appearance.
L(ra):Broadwav Center: outletsprovide convenience goods and consumer services for
residents in the general vicinitY:
Burlinqame Plaza Area: a center for convenience goods and consumer services to
local residents and workers, no change in the pattem of uses presenfly established:
.'3
1 Better circulation, more parking and better urban design would enhmce
this center including separation ofvehicular and pedesrian circulation and
reduction of through-haffic on Broadway.
2.Consider creating a pedestrian precinct on Broadway in the section
betrrrreen Laguna Avenue and Capuchino Avenue.
Provide oFstreet parking to the rear of present business outlets fronting
on Broadway with access to zuch lots from new steets.
Develop an urban design plan to pfovide more detailed guidance for future
changes.
Lurlingame Avenue-Park Road Center: provides outlets for a wide range of
consgmer goods and services for Burtingame residents and residents of adjoining
communities including business service establishments, business and professional
offices, civic buildings and some residential uses; and presents a prime
opportunity to develop combinations of retail, office and residential uses in
clusters of appropriately designed stnrctures.
The center area uses should be organized with shopping goods outlets, in
the main, located along Burlingame Avenue and Park Road in a pedestrian
precincq convenience goods stores, restaurants, and consume service
outlets should not occupy ground level street frontage space in the heart of
the center but should be in more peripheral locations.
2.The frontage of the west side of Chapin Avenue should be limited to office
uses;
)3
4.
L(l5):
I
City ofBurlingame PP-9 General Plan
J
POLICY PII\N
I
3
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
The Service and Special Sales area indicated along California Drive and
Highland Avenue recognizes the existing auto sales and service activities
and provides space for expansion of "auto rou/'businesses or other similar
kinds of activity;
An area between Highland Avenue and Par'k Road is designed for medium
high density residential developmenl
Areas designed for shopping and service uses along Park and Primrose
Roads south of Howard Avenue are appropriate locations for offrce and
institutional uses, in addition to retail and consumer service
establishments, and should be given particular attention to enhance
appeafimce and athactiveness of this area to provide an attractive enffance
to Burlingame's downtown center.
6. '- Sites on the periphery would be appropriate for apartuents of single
Frsons and families without children particularly those who want the
advantages of a location near a center of activity and do not wish to own
an automobile.
7. An urban design plan for the entire downtown area should be developed.
Waterfront Commercial: uses in this area should be limited to activities that eittrer
depend on waterfront location or directly benefit from location on the waterfront.
4.
5.
1 L(16):
Policy L(II): Industrial Uses are intended to continue in the present pattem with
occupancy bywholesale outlets, professional and administrative offices, and
Iight manufacturing Plants.
Action:
L(17):Deyelop.programs to address inadequate access and lack of public transportation.
L(l8):The East Mitlsdale area will be increasingly sought as a location for airport-
related uses.
Policy L@: The city provides the following public facilities: wastewater treatment, water
distribution system, trash collection and limited trash disposal.
City of Burlingame PP.lO General Plan
I
PII\N
Policy L(O:
Action:
L(le):
Referto Land Use Element.
POLICIESAND ACTIONS
Commercial -Residential Mixed Use are retail commercial and multiple
famrty residential uses intended to create a transition between established
retail commercial and residential zones so that the sense of residential
activity is consered.
Retail uses compatible with residential uses can serve to meld the adjacent wtrolly
retail and residential areas.
Physically unique areas such as the properties with double sheet frontage on
Blgehill and California Drives should be included.
3
L(20):
)
Cityof Bulingamc PP-lI Gcneral Plan
)
POLICY PLAN
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
The following land use policies and action statements are srunmarized ftom the Circulation
Element adopted by Resolution 8769, October 20, 1969. These poliiies and actions as stated
here have not been adopted by the City Council and should be used for reference only. For a firll
statement of the Circulation Policies see the Circulation Elemen! page CI-l and following.
POLICIES AND ACTION:
Policy CI(A): The system of circulation proposed in this plan recognizes Burlingame's
sitnation astride a maior transportation corridor on the San Mateo
Peninsula.
Action
cI(r):
-.'.._
Develop an integrated system of regioml rapid transit and local tansit to serve
Burlingame residents and workers and to provide for the high volume through-
movement that will have to be accommodated in this hansit corridor in the future.
l
Policy CI@): An integrated system of circulation facilities is recommended to link
Burlingame to other parts of the Bay Area, permit tralfrc to move through
the City with minimum impact on adjoining areas, and link residential areas
with activity centers in the City.
Action
cr(2):Additions and improvements to the interchanges at Millbrae Avenug Broadway
and Peninsula Avenue to provide for full directional movement at each ofthese
interc-hanges and to accommodale the increasing volumes of traffic that will be
generated, particularly from the industial areas.
cr(3)Propose a system of major arterials for major north-south movements to takc care
oflonger distance local trips and to connect Burlingame with adjacent
communities including: El Camino Real, Califomia Drive, and Bayshore Highway
and its extension lhrough the Anza Pacific development.
cr(4):The portion of the major arterial abutting the City Pa*(at the Warerfront) should
be located outboard ofthe present bul*head to avoid reducing the park area with
particular attention to visual quality, provision of pedeshian crossings, and
111fui6lrng the impact of industrial traffrc on the recreational use of the park and
the waterfront.
cr(5):Major east-west traffic should be canied on: Millbrae Avenue (in Millbrae);
Trousdale Drive; Carmelita avenue from El Camino Real to Califomia Drive a
connection to a grade separation at Broadway and the railroad; Oak Grove
Avenue; and Peninsula Avenue.
City of Burlingamc PP-I2 GcDcral Plan
l CIRCULATION ELEMENT
l
FOLICT PII\N
, POLICIESANDACTIONS
Policy CI(C): The integrated system would coordinate rapid transit,local public transit,
auto parking nnd through and local auto trafric.
3
)
cr(7):
cr(8):
The rapid transit line should be completely grade separated, designed to minimize
noise and prevent adverse visual impact on the
There should be sufficient grade separated local street crossings to keepthe r-apid
transit line from being a barrier.
cr(e):Railroad grade separations are recommended at Broadway, Oak Grove, Howard,
and PeninsutaAvenues.
cr(10):A highway overpass is needed across Bayshore Freeway to connect the Millsdale
and East Millsdale industial areas.
cr(l1):An overpass to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists is recommended to
connect to the Bayside Park from the vicinity of Winchester Drive.
cr(12):It is recommended that a parkway be established along the Bayfront connecting
Burlingame's Bayside Park with San Mateo County's Coyote Point Park.
Policy CI@): Special consideration should be given to the location and character of trallic
cariers to ensure their compatibility with adjoining uses and to provide a
framewoFkwithin which each sub-area of the City can develop its own
special characteristics and sense of local identity.
Action
CI(Q:
Action:
cI(13):
cr(l4):
Provide an integrated qystem of Southern Pacific Railroad (primarily for through
movement of freight), a rapid transit line adjacent to the Southern Pacific rail line,
local transit and four categories of streets and highways to accommodate private
passenger automobiles and local ransit vehicles.
The station should be included as an integral element of a complex of service and
shopping facilities, together with office and higtr density residential
accommodations.
Advantage should be taken of the 300 foot stip occupied by Carolan Avenue, the
Railroad and California Drive to link the Burlingame Avenue-Park Road shopping
areawiththe Broadway shopping center providing an opportunity for exciting
visual design and the development of an efficient local transportation system to
provide the backbone of a local distibution and feedertransit system.
City of Burtingame PP-I3 Gcneral Plan
)
POLICYPLI\N
cr(l5):
cr(l6):
Refer to Circulation Element.
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
Innovative use of existing and new types of vehicles would make possible higher
density development around the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway centers.
The system of streets around the Broadway shopping center and the Burlingame
Avenue shopping center are intended to provide movement around the centers,
connect to parking lots, and pernit the central portions of these shopping centers
to be freed of all or most vehicular traffic and turned over primarily to pedestrians.
City of Burlingamc PP.I4 General Plan
.i
!
I
POUCYPLI\N
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
HOUSING ELEMENT
POLICIES AND ACTION:
Ilousing GoaI A: PRESERVE RESIDENIIAL CHARACTER BY ENCOIIRAGING
MAINTENAI\CE, IMPROYEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF
THE CITY'S I\TEIGIIBORIIOODS AI{D HOUSING STOCIC
Poliry H(A-l): Protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods.
'3
Policy II(A-2): Continue rehabilitation of structures in poor condition.
Wittlin current staffing limits, establish aprograln of contacting owners of
stnrctures that appear to be overctowded, declining, or in need of repair;
advertise the Rehabilitation Loan Program administered by San Mateo County
which may be used to reduce overcrowding and assist qualified homeowners
in becoming aware of funding opportuoities and making application.
(Upgrade 5 units per year, total25 units).
Action
H(l):
Action
H(2):
Action
H(3):
Action
H(4):
Policy II(A-5):
In residential neighborhoods continue the mainterumce and enhancement of
public facilities such as sfieets, water supply and drainageby allocations from
the general fund, gas ta>c revenue and, urhere appropriate, conditions of
development.
Continue existing zoning controls prohibiling conversion ofrental projects
with fewer than 2l units to condominiums.
Amend zoning requirements to require a use permit when dwelling rmits are
proposed to be replaced by non-residential units.
Pursue federal and State funds for the rehabilitation of lower and
moderate income housing.
Develop contacts with non-profit housing corporations and San Mateo County
Community Services Deparfinent to develop progrulms for use of available
l
Policy II(A-3): Maintain rental opportunities by discouraging conversion of alfordable
rental units to condominiums.
Policy II(A4): Promote programs that protect the City's lower-valued housing stock
Action
H(5):
)
Cityof Burlingame PP-I5 General Plan
POLICY PINN
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
programs (such as HOME) to acquire and rehabilitate 20 apartnrent units for
long-term affordability.
Policy II(A{): Provide pro'sale inspection upon request.
Action
H(6):
Policy H(A-7):
Action
H(7):
Continue program ,1ru1 ,"sis1s iI research ofresidential records upon the
request ofrealtors or potential buyers. Establish site inspection for a fee
program.
Conrider neiglbortood quality when approving now and remodeled
residences.
lmplement cument 2sning regulations addressing setbacks, floor area ratio,
declining height. Develop guidelines and handouts describing and
promulgathg key components of neighborhood quality.
Housing Goal B: PROYIDE VARIETY AI\D CHOICE OF HOUSING BY PROMOTING
HOUSING OPPORTTINTTTES FOR ALL PERSONS REGARDLESS OF
AGE, SEX, RACE, COLO& MARI'TAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
NATIONAL ORIGIN OR OTHER BARRIERS.
I Policy II@-1): Promote equal housing opporhnities for all Burlingame residents.
Action
H(8):Expand Planning Departnent and Building Deparbnent code enforcement
activities to provide infomration handouts, inform the public and local realtors
about equal housing laws and recourse available in case ofviolations; refer
complaints to Califomia Departnent of Fair Employment and Housing.
Ilousing Goal C: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL PITRPOSE HOUSING
Policy H(C-l): Provide adequate, affordable housing for the City's elderly.
Action
Assign staf to work with local developers and non-profit organizations which
serve seniors, and with the Senior Commission to carry out the following
actions.
a. Senior Commission discuss allowing temporary accessible accessory unir
for frail elderly work with Planning Commission to develop appropriate
regulations.
b. Planniag staffcoordinate with San Mateo County Housing Authority to
increase number of Section 8 units for Burlingame elderly.
H(e)
City of Burliagame PP-I6 Gcn€ral Plan
I
retffi
c. Senior Commission enlist seniors to operate housing information network.
d. Expand present incentives (reduced parking) for new senior housing to a
broader spectrum of housing for seniors. Parking requirements should be
reduced to one space for four units.
e. Continue financial support for non-profit agencies to administer housing
prograrrs for seniors (home-sharing, reverse mortgage). Planning stalil:
should work with these agencies to facilitate implementation of their
programs.
f. City Council and Plaming Departrnent should encourage non-profit
housing groupsto develop housing by facilitating projectprocessing and
environmental review and maintaining incentives in zoning regulations.
Policy H(C-2): Encourage alterations to existing struclres,that improve access for
physically disadvantaged.
3
Action
H(r0):Formulate and consider code changes that would allow code exceptions to
modi$ housing for elderly and physically disabled for the duration of their
tenancy.
)Policy H(C-3): Encourage housing opportunities for single-parent families.
Action
H(ll):Assign staffto carry out the following actions:
a. Work with county Housing Authority to increase number of Section 8
certificates for families.
b. Develop a progr m for financial assistance to a non-profit housing
corporation to administer a home-shating program for Burlingame
residents. Develop and distibute literature to Burlingame residents.
Policy H(C-4): Encourage housing opportunities for low-income single percons.
Action
H(r2):Assign staffto develop revisions to the Code to encourage development of
single-room occupancy (SRO) and small no-frill rmits with reduced parking
requirements for aparhents. Contact potential developers.
Policy H(C-s): Support county-widc prognrm for homeless percons.
Action
H(13):
City of Burlingame PP.I7 General Plan
jContinue financial contributions; modifr Code to allow group facilities for
homeless persorur in specified zoning districts subject to obtaining a use
pennit.
POLICY
ANDACTIONS
Housing Goal D: REDUCE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE TO CONSERVE EI\IERGY
AND HELP REDUCE HOUSING COSTS.
Poticy H@-1): Promote the use of energr conservation in residential construction.
Poticy H@-2): Encourage enerry conservation measures in rehabilitation projects.
Acfion
H(14):
Action
-H(r5):
Action
H(16):
In all plan-checking, apply trtle24 energy conservationrequirements; where
possible in planning developments, require structural and landscaping design
to make use of natural heating and cooling.
Make literanre available to publicize energy conservation programs and
weatherization services that are available to provide subsidized or at cost
inspections and corrective action (25 existing units).
Encourage housing development by making sure zoning is in place, parking
requirements are reduced where long-terur affordability is guaranteed, and by
fast-tracking zoning and building permit processing for housing applications
on the following sites:
a. Site l: Adjoining parcels at El Camino Real and Trousdale-14,000 and
25,000 SF zoned C-l (estimated at 75 rmits).
b. Site 2: Residential over existing private commercial parking in multiple
ownership uear Mtrchison and Californiaaarcels total approximately
67,500 SF (estimated at 50 market rate units).
c. Site 3: Interiorparcel bounded by Trousdale, Ogden, Murchison and
Magnolia (estimated atl22,25A SF minimum 150 units elderly residential
care).
d. Site 4: Cootiguous parcels on two blocks fronting on Califomia Drive
between Juanita and Broadway (estimated to total 25,700 SF and 17,000
SF respectively-I00 studio and one bedroom units).
e. Site 5: Air rights over down-town public parking lots along Donnelly and
over public parking lots between Howard and Bayswater Avenues.
Housing Goal E: ACHIEVE INCREASED AFFORDABILITY OF HOUSING.
Policy H@-1): Improve balance of housing type, tenure and affordabitity by
encouraging development of the sites and locations listed below to serve
the income levels indicated.
City of Burlingame PP-I8 General PIan
1
I
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
f. Site 6: Parcel approved for 4Gunit project on corner of Highland and
HowardAvenues.
Policy H@-2):Maintain data base of existing R-3, R-4 and CRzoning districts
developed for the llousing Element update to remain aware of lhe
number of additional units that could be developed on "under-
developed" parcels in these areas.
'3
Poticy H@-3): Encourage construction of mixed commercial residential.
Action
H(l7):
Action
H(I8):
Action
H(le):
Maintainthe area-by-area surveys, note changes in vacant and underutilized
sites; periodically contact owners to determine intentions for the properties in
these zoning disticts. Promote development of housing units by waiving or
reducing parking requirements and prioritizing the project's planning and
building permit review process to reduce development costs in exchange for
guarantees of long-term atrordability.
Identifr potential sites for 50 no frills units and SRO's and modiff regulations
to encourage development. Expand previous actions. Consider, as have in the
past, parking reductions for location in tansit corridors as well as for smaller
singti family units and benefits, if mixed use, with different day/night parking
demands.
Staff, Planning Commissio& and City council fomrulate program for
conversion of existing accessory living units to be promulgated.
-l
t
Poticy II(F-4): Encourage conversion of.existing accessory living units to legal, safe and
sanitary housing units.
Policy H@-O: Encourage non-profrt housing corporations to develop affordable housing
on appropriate sites in Burlingame.
Action
H(20):Staffcontact known non-profit corporations and religious institutions to make
them aware of City interest and to familiarize them with opportunities in
Burlingame. If feasible, work with them to use air rights over parking and
other structures, to receive fimds from HOME and other sources.
City ofBurlingame PP.I9 General Plan
)
POLICYPIJIN
POLICIESA}.IDACTIONS
Policy II(E-O: Work for expansion of Section 8 program.
Action
H(21):Work with County Community Services and Housing Authority to provide
Burlingame aproportionate share of Section 8 funds; disEibute infonnation
about program to potential property owner and renter participants.
Policy II(E-?: Participate in County first-time buyer program (Mortgage Credit
Certificate).
Action
Adopt cooperative agreement with San Mateo County.
Refer to Housing Element pp. H-47-58.
HQz):
I
City of Burlingame PP-20 General Plan
AI,IDACTIONS
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Preserve existing open space and open space lands to the fullest extent
practicable, wittt spaces ranging in size from regional scale to srnall open
spaces on individual lots.
Increase privacy, amenity and safety, and assure provision of light and air.
Preserve the important vistas, such as the hillside leading to the Skyline Ridge
as seen from the Bay plain, and the Bay as seen from the hillside.
:3
POLICIES:
Policy OS(A):
Policy OS(B):
Policy OS(C):
Policy OS@): Provide open space for recreational needs and for the preservation of sites of
historical and culttral significance.
Poticy OS(E): Protect and maintain those areas necessary to the integrity of the natural
processes with special emphasis on, but not limitedto, the water regimen and
airquattty.
Poticy OS(F): Protect and preserve open spaces which are vital as wildlife habitat and areas
of major or unique ecological significance.
Policy OS(G): Maintain open space to shape and gurde development and to enhance
community identity.
Policy OS(H): Establish the basic frarnework for a continuing action program designed to
protect valuable and limited open space resources.
ACTIONS
os(1):Ardas that contibute to the maintenance of a quality living environment for both
local aod zub-regional residents should be preserved as open space. Areas that fall
into this category include:
Areas of visual dominance - Skyline Ridge, Canyons, Bay.
Visual corridors.
Areas of special ecological significance (wildlife and vegetation).
Areas of cultural and historic significance.
os(2):Areas hazardous to the public safety and welfare should be retained as oper space.
Areas that fall into ttris category include:
Slopes generally over 30 percenl
Areas of identified instability.
Streams and their flood plains.
I,
a.
b.
c.
d.
a
b.
c.
City ofBurlingame PP-2I General Plan
J
POLICIES ANDACTIONS
Conservation easements, open space znningand other land use regulations should
be used to prohibit development on unstable terraiq water channels, flood plains,
excessively steep slopes and other areas determined hazardous to public welfare
and safety.
Open spaces should be linked together visually and, where possible, physically to
form a system ofopen spaces.
A variety of vistas should be provided and preserved ranging from the small
enclosed private views to the more distant views shared by many people.
Both public and private efforts should be directed to preserving historical
Iandmarks which have open space value.
Inthe desigu and execution of all newdevelopment, owners and developers
should be required to preserve open space to the fullest extent possible.
Measures should be taken to improve the quality of spaces for the pedestrian
along roadways so the pedesrian can feel safe and comfortable while using these
spaces.
Refer to Open Space Element, pp. OS-5-7.
os(3):
os(4):
os(s):
os(7):
os(6):
os(8)
City ofBurlingamc PP-22 Gencral Plan
POLICYPLAN
I
PII\N
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
policy C(A): To initiate, develop, and implement progralns for the conservation of natural
resources giving particular attention to critical resource conditions.
policy C(B): To prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and stimulate the health and
welfare of the citizens of Burlingame.
Poticy C(9: To restore, where found to be feasible, natural features of vegetative cover,
steams, marsh and bay where areas have been'unduly distwbed by man.
policy C(D): To initiate, develop, and implement programs for the conservatisn of the built
Policy C(E): To foster public educational programs on local conservation needs.
Policy CG): To participate in regional consenration progrcms of direct concern to the City.
Policy C(G): To promote economic growth which is consistent with an improvement in the
quality of the environment.
ACTION
c(1):The City should act to protect valuable vegetative cover and encourage planting
additional vegetation, giving preference to indigenous materials-
c(2):The City should initiate a study by the Planning Commission ofthe remaining
natural areas to determine the effect of devel ipment on or near these areas.
Because projects being developed outside the corporate limits can adversely affect
the City environmen! Burlingame should monitor all major developments through
the EIR process and other procedures.
c@:
c(5):The City should acquire development rights where formd to be necessary to
protect areas that are of outstanding value in their natural condition.
To protect existing urban areas and structures from deterioration, Burlingame
should insure ttrat private places are properly maintained.
')
)
c(3):
c(o:
City ofBurlingame PP-23 General Plan
l
POLICIES:
The City should protect the creeks flowing throughprivate and public lands by
regulation and acquisition of conservation easements where found to be necessary.
c(7):
i
POUCYPII\N
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
In order to develop a stronger conservation awareness in the people of
Burlingame, the City shouldhelp to develop conservation education prograurs in
the schools and inthe community
c(8):To develop an exchange of information, the City should maintain communication
with conservation groups and conservation agencies in areas of direct concern to
the City.
Refer to Conservation Element, pp. C-3, C-5.
1
I
City of Burlingamc PP.24 General Plan
POLICYPI"AN
POLICIES ANDACTIONS
SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT
POLICIES:
Policy SS(A): Consider developing a "balanced risk" policy that relates seismic hazards to
acceptable risk by building type and intensity of use.
Policy SS@): Require that new development incorporate seismic hazafi mitigation measures
to reduce risk to an acceptable level.
Poticy SS(C): Institute a continuing prograrn of evaluating existing structtres with a high
risk rating, a hidr intensity oceupaocy and those critical facilities that must
survive a severe earttrquake.
Policy SS@): r: Eucourage the reduction of risks associated with the more dangerous existing
buildings through action programs, including renovation and occupancy
reduction.
Policy SS@): Consider an ordinance requiring the preparation of intemal emergency
response plans for facilities housing dependent populations.
Policy SS@): Define a policy for properties over or immediately adjacent to the Serra Fault.
Policy SS(G): Periodically update and refine this element to enable it to achieve its general
objectives.
Policy SS(II): Consider the establishment of a Seismic Safety Committee to assume
responsibility for the implementation of this element.
Policy SS(I): Consider selecting a qualified geotechnical firm to advise the crty during the
'tnplementation period of the larger seismic safety projects.
Policy SS(J):Consider establishing procedures to make available to the public all knowtu
pertinent geotechnical data regarding their properly, and other reports of a
more general nature on city-wide seismic hazards.
ACTIONS
SS(1):Implement agreed programs to improve or abate existing dangerous buildings.
sS(2):Survey major structures to determine the need for a parapet ordinance
(applying to parapets, signs, marquees and general ornamentation).
,-)
]
City of Burlingame PP.25 General Plan
l
POTICYPII\N
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
ss(3)Consider placing fault movement gauges along active fault traces to monitor
activity.
ss(a):Review and update the City's disaster preparedness plan.
ss(s):Assess need for additional earthquake and flood insr:rance on City property
and facilities.
,ss(6):Improve interjurisdictional cooperation and communication in regard to
seismic safety.
Refer to Seismic Safety Element pp. SS-24-25.
City of Burlingamc PP-26 Gcneral Plan
i
)
POLICIESA}ID
SAFETY ELEMENT
POLICIES:
Poticy S(A): Identifi existing natural and man-made safety hazards, and devise a reasonable
assignment of responsibility for their correction or reduction which will be within
limits of economic acceptability.
Policy S(B): Increase public understanding of safety issues so that unnecessary risk may be
avoided.
Policy S(C): Identify any urgently needed implementation mea$nes or new legislation.
Policy S(D): Set safety goals consistent with the goals of other elements of the Burlingame
General Plan.
ACTIONS:
s(1):Survey older high rise buildings, and recommend ways tlnt owners can provide a
greater degree of built-in fire protection.
s(2):Survey older buildings with extensive floor areas, and recommend ways to
increase fire safety.
s(3):Review desirability of a municipal ordinance requiring smoke activated fire alarm
devices in existing buildings; determine types of building to which this should
apply.
S(4):Evaluate existing hazadof combustible roofs inthe Crty's residential areas; if
unacceptable, propose ways to reduce the degree ofrisk.
s(5):Consider an education program to encourage all homeowners to install home fire
detection systems. Consider an ordinance requiring all such systems installed in
the city meet National Fire Protection Association standards, and requiring that all
vendors and installers be required to obtain a permit before selling or installing
such a system.
s(o:Reviewpros and cons of more extensive Mutual Aid and Automatic Aid
agreements.
s(7):Consider establishment of a crty fire service $rta:( on stnrctures appreciably
below present fire code standards. The assessment should be related to higher Fire
Deparrnent costs needed for increased service to buildings without built-in
protection.
,a3
)
City of Burlingame PP-27 General Plan
)
POLICY P[,AN
s(e)
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
S(8):Develop a clearly defined Fire Protectiotr Strategy for adoption by the City
Council. The report should include: policy statements, strategic objectives and
tactical means to preven! detect and control f ires.
Review need for increased protection Aom high tides and storms on the Bay;
estimate benefits and costs.
s(10):Recommend minimum acceptable elevation for future shoreline improvements;
consider means to bring older, lower sites up to this standard'
s(1r):Review dyke levels along the principal drainage channels in thc industrial area;
rccommend minimum acceptable elevations, and prepare cost estimates for the
required work.
s(12):Cornplete crcek drainage works recommended in 1954 Jenks aad Adamson report;
improvements outstanding: Easton Creek near Easton Drive and Canyon Road;
Ralston Creek near 1400 Floribunda Avenue; Ralston Creek in 1400 block
Bellevue Avenue; Ralston Creek near 411 El Camino Real; and Burlingame
Creek in 200 block Primrose Road.
s(I3):Increase the City's emergency pumpiry ability with an independent power source;
review need for additional pumps.
s(1d):Affirm general policy to maintain PG&E right-of-way as emergency ponding
reservoir; consider ordinance to prohibit development incompatible with this
policy.
S(15): Prepare qualitative evaluation ofponding capacity ofCity's "inner lagoon".
s(16):Review impact of 100 year flood on Burlingame; consider preparation ofplan and
estimated cost of improvements to protect property with recommendations to meet
situation and satisf recent Federal requirements.
s(l7):Prepare detailed study of City's existing water circulation system; establish
trouble points and recommend priorities for any immediate work requircd.
s(l8)Review desirability of connections with the cities of lvfillbrae and San Mateo for
emergency supply. Consider vrclls and altemative sources to temporadly replace
City of San Francisco water.
s(re):Evaluate hazard from failure ofthe City's two water reservoirs, and the need for
emergency power supply for system's two water pumping stations; review need
for additional pumping capacity.
City of Burlingame PP.2E General PIan
POLICY PI.AN
S(20):
s(2r):
s(22):
s(23):
s(24):
s(2s):
POLICIES A}.ID ACTIONS
Reassess hazards from pollution and infiltation of toxic substances into the water
supply; recornmend ways to reduce these hazards.
Evaluate compatibility of densities and maximum height limits presently allowed
by the TnnrngOrdinance with water system capacities.
Review sewerage system capacity and condition; establish trouble points and
recommend priorities for improvements.
Collect and analyze further information on: alluvium and baymud hazards;
liquefactio nlirazard4, and landslide and mudslide hazards.
Prepare a report on safety hazards from potential civil disturbances - bomb threats,
sniper fire and riots; assess planned City response.
Investigate the concept of "defensible space;" prepare recommendations for
ZorfugOrdinance amendments to encourage crime prevention.
S(2O: Reviewand update the City's Emergency Operations Plan.
s(27)Evaluate present procedures to repair broken power transmission lines; review
possible improvements under widespread disaster conditions.
s(28):Review Fire Deparfrnent and medieal aid response to a frain deraiLnent or
airplane crash \ rittlin a residential district of the city.
s(2e):Assess the life loss and property loss hazards from a fuel or chemical spill on city
streets; if the hazards are unacceptable, propose ways to reduce them.
S(30): Evaluate the hazard from older, larger tees under storm conditions.
Referto Safety Element pp. S-2, 5-13-15.
3
)
City ofBurlingame PP.29 Gencral Plan
")
POLICY PLAN
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
SCENIC ROADS AND HIGHWAYS ELEMENT
POLICIES:
Policy SR(A):To retain a system of arterials and local roads that are beautifiil and usefril to local
residents.
Policy SR@):To harmonize roads and highways with adjacent land use and roadside
development.
Policy SR(C):To enhance the haveler's "view from the road."
sR(l):
sR(2)El Camino Real, state highway Route 82, is a scenic highway where views from
the road are contained.
(a). These heritage trees give Burlingame a distinctive image.
(b). The segments of El Camino Real where abutting property is zoned first.
commercial are defined as scenic corurecto$. Commercial buildings and signs
along El Camino Real should receive design review and satisff all municipal
codes. Trinfibuning properties along the road provide a scenic character and add $fLx
to the Burlingame image.
sR(3):Except wtrere taffic hazards might be created, median strips, traffic islands, and
excess highway rights-of-way should be lanlscaped.
sR(4):The County ofSan Mateo proposes the loop via Skyline Boulevard, Canyon Road
Easton Drive, El Camino Real and Crystal Springs Road back to Skyline
Boulevard be designated a County Scenic Roadway and part ofthe proposed
Scenic Road System.
sR(s):Explore frrlly all practicable regulatory approaches intended to protect views along
scenic highways and Burlingame's scenic routes.
Consider a progmm to provide appropriate identification fot Burlingame's scenic
routes: highways and roads fo( motorists; rcutes, lanes and separate paths for
bicyclists.
, sR(7)Utility lines should be undergrormded wherever possible; and sensitively sited
where placement must be abovegtound.
City of Burlingame PP-30 General Plan
ACTIONS:
The City of Burlingame recommends that Interstate Highway 2S0 be designated as
a State Scenic Higbway, because ofthe beauty ofthe countryside through ufuich ir
passes, and becatrse ofthe relative sensitivity and skillfulness of its design
sR(6):
sR(e):
FOLICTPI"AN
POLICIESA}.IDACTIONS
SR(S): Plant materials should be used to screen or hide objectionable views.,,'3
A design study should be prepared to include a San Francisco Bay viewscape plan
for Airport Boulevard from Broadway to Coyote Point Drive.
sR(10):An integrated plan for hiking riding and bike trails should be coordinated with the
scenic road system. Plan for separate bike paths to be constuc'ted along scenic
road and highwayroutes whenever and wherever economically feasible,
reasonable and practical.
sR(l1):Previously adopted General Plan Elements express as public policy the other
actions needed to help carry out this Scenic Roads and Highways Element.
Refer to Scenic Roads and Highways Element, pp. SR-2, SR-10-l l.
)
City of Burlingamc PP-3I General Plan
J
POLICY PLAN
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
NOISE ELEMENT
The following land use policies and action statements are zummarized from the Noise Element
adopted by Resolution 69-75, September 15,1975, These policies and actions as stated here
have not been adopted by the city council and slrould be used for reference only. For a full
statement of the Noise Policies see the Noise Elemen! page N-34 and following.
DECLARATION OF POLICY
The City of Burlingame declares a policy ofexcluding and prohibiting all annoying, excessive
and wmecessary noises from all sowces which are subject to its regulatory, administative and
police powers. The City takes notice that for certain intensity levels, noise is detimental to the
health, welfare and eujoyment ofthe citizenry as well as detrimental to the quality ofthe
environment. The City takes special notice that it is the peneaation ofunwanted sound ftom
sources not contollable by an individual household that deserve the highest priority in order to
insure each persorfs right to peaceful surroundings.
Policy N@): Reduce annoying levels of noise for existing situations; aircraft, motor vehicle and
domestic animal noise which were identified by a Noise Questionnaire to be the
most annoying at present.
Policy N(C): Achieve a peaceful acoustic environment in portions of the city to be developed.
Poticy N@): Consider use of existing city and inter-govemmental processes to accomplish
noise control.
Policy N@): '"Arrive at resultant imple,mentation programs which are consistent with Stats and
Federal guidelines and which are (i) legally valid (ii) not rmduly costly, and (iii)
do not impose undue hardship upon residential property owners and community
business interests.
Policy N(F): Foster in the citizens of all segrrents of the City an assurance that their concems
with unwanted sormd levels are of importance to the City, and publicize the
existence of avenues by which these problems can be quantified and mitigated.
City of Bu ingsrtrc PP.32 Gcncral Plan
POLICIES:
Policy N(A): Preserve peaceful noise conditions in the city where they do exist.
ACTIONS:
PLAN
POLICIES ACTIONS
Consider Adoption of Administative Review Process.
Institute an AirportNoise Surveillance Program for a period oftwo or three
weeks.
Consider Vehicle Noise Emission Standards Enforcement.
Consider Municipal Vehicle and Mainterumce Operations Noise Control.
Consider developing an Educational Campaign to describe to city residents their
noise climate and what they can do to change it.
Consider Adoption of a Noise Ordinance.
Update the Noise Element.
Undertake a Bayshore Freeway Noise Attenuation Study.
Defer the institution of a Domestic Animal Noise progr.un.
,'3
N(1):
N(2):
N(3):
N(Q:
N(O:
N(O:
N(7):
N(8):
N(e):
)Refer to Noise Element, pp. N-4448.
City of Burlingame PP-33 General Plan
)
POLTCY PLAN
POLICIES AND ACTIONS
SPECIFIC AREA PLAN
POLICYGOALS:
Goat SAP(A):Development shall be consistent with the capacity of the adjacent road system.
Goat SAP@):A specific plan should be selected which maximizes public access to the shoreline.
Goat SAP(O: Development should yield a high revenue-to-cost ratio.
Goal SAP@):Development should be visually attractive, pleasing both to those who work and
.. visit the areq anC ",lso to those who use the ara for recreation.
GoaI SAP(F):Land uses in the Bayfront should be environmentally consistent with, and
supportive of, Burlingame's main function as a residential community, and
Goal SAP(G):Land uses in the bayfront should reflect the special locational value of the area:
proximity to regional freeway and to the San Francisco lnt'emational Airport.
ACTIONS:
sAP(1):Reserve sites closest to the shoreline for land uses which draw a large number of
visitors (i.e., hotels and restauants).
sAP(2):Provide a continuous network ofattractive and safe pedestrian and bicycle access
along the shoreline and through the interior ofthe Anza Area
sAP(3)Encourage implementation of the Burlingame Zoning ordinance requirement for a
2s-foot-wide shoreline ship, consistent with the Bay Area Conservation and
Development Commission @CDC) requiremeuts for the provision of public
access to the shoreline.
sAP(4):Establish a desirable level of service for transportation facilities: a balance
between traffc volumes and road capacities.
sAP(s):Identiff appropriate sites for developments which genemte high volumes of traffic
at peak hours.
sAP(6):Identi! improvements to increase road capacities to serve the uses proposed in
the SAP.
City of Burlingame General Plan
GoaI SAP@):Guidelines and regulations should be adopted which will insure good quality
development.
l
PP.34
POLICY PLAN
POLICIES A}.ID ACTIONS
sAP(7):Create a fiscal mechanism for sharing the costs of transportation improvements by
private developers.
sAP(8):Encourage low intensity development or no development iftransportation
facilities are not available for higher intensity land uses.
sAP(e):Establish a high priority for development of hotels and restaurants which would
generate substantial revenues to the City from room and sales taxes.
sAP(l0):Actively encourage major restaurant chains to locate in the area. Establish site
standards for athactive public improvements to accompany hotel and restaurant
constrrction.
sAP(r1):Reserveprime hotel and restaurant sites andpreserve them from early
development for other land uses through the Specific Area, Plan land use
designations.
sAP(r2)The design of developments must be coordinated to protect the visual
attractiveness of the area and create a harmonious visual environment consistent
withthe image of the Burlingame community.
SAP(13): Establish height and setback regulations for new developments.
SAP(1a): Encourage site designs that improve the appearance of parking areas.
SAP(15): Encourageintensivelandscaping.
sAP(1Q:Provide view corridors for views of the Bay and the Anza Lagoon both from
within and outside the area.
SAP(I 7) : Maintain existing buildings in present uses until redevelopment is feasible.
SAP(I8):Improve some sEeets to improve traffic flow in the area and to accommodate
anticipated traffc generated from future development.
sAP(le):Allow interim low intensity land uses on available sites until regional derrand for
high intensig uses grows.
Referto Specific AreaPlan, pp. SAP-12-14.
':3
City ofBurlingame PP-35 General Plan
,)
,)
The City of Burlingame
PI.ANNINGDEPARTMENT
CITY TIAII 5OI PRMROSE ROAI)
BURUNGAI@ CAIIFORNIA 9 4OIO-3997
TEL: (550)
FAX: (650)
558:7250
69G3790
January 24,2002
Jerry Deal
1228 PalomaAvenue
Burlingarne CA 94010
Dear Mr. Deal,
At the City Council meeting of Novembert 19;2001, the Council scheduled an appeal
hearing of your appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny your application
for rezoningat l226.l228Pa7omaAvenue ard 1224 Paloma Avenue, zoned R-1. This
application was to rezone these and other properties from R-l to R-2.
It is understood that you wish to amend the application to include rezoning from R-l to R-
2 of only your propefty at 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue and the neighboring property at
1224 Paloma Avenue. The remaining properties included in the original application
(1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue, 1225 & 1229 Lagwa Avenue and 1224 & 1228
Capuchino Avenue) have been deleted from your request.
A public hearing will be held on February 4,2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers,
501 Primrose Roa4 Burlingame, CA. Please note: your letter requested the hearing be
sgt for February 5,2002; the Council meeting is on Monday, February 4,2002.
We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me if you have
any questions.
Sincerely yours,
City Planner
IvIRB/s
l226Q8pabrnax*
Margaret Joscher, 1224 P aloma Avenue
City Clerk
c.
tr
Jerry Deal (Owner of current duplex)
1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
Burlingamc, CA 94010
&
MarEaret Joscher (Owner of single family residence)
l224Piloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
&
Town & Country Property Management ( five unit apartment building)
l22SLaguna
Burlingame, CA 94010
To City of Btrlingame,
Planning Department and
Members ofthe City Council
.11-19-2001
I wish to proceed to the City Council meeting of February 56 with an amended
application for conversion of two properties from their R-l designation to that of an R-2
designation. My original application (attached) was only for 1224 Paloma and
1226-1228 Paloma and the proposal with which I would like to proceed.
Ifthe City of Burlingarne deems thatthe property located af 1225 Lagunamust be apart
of this application I have the permission of the Owner's representative that they be
included as the third properly. No other properties are to be included in this proposal.
Deal
RECEIVED
Nov r. I 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
To:
Jerry Deal (owner)
1226 -1228 Paloma Avenu e
Burlingame, CA 94010
&
Margaret Joscher (owner)
l224Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 940f0
City of Burlingame
Plarming Deprtrnent
Members of the Planning Commission
8-9-01
I am requesting that the properties located at 1226-1228 Paloma and 1224 Paloma
be rezoned from their Lurrent R-t designation to an R-2 designation. The reasons for this
request and supporting evidence is as follows
The amnesty Fogram for second units excludes my property at 1226=1228 Paloma
and therefore under that program will remain as a nonconforming use. It is not fair or
proper that properties which have been hidden from the City will be sanctioned as
"conforming" while my rmits which are well known to the City, are documented as
haviug separate addresses at both the City and the County Regishar would remain "non
conforming"..
T\e 1224 Paloma property adjoins an R-3 lot which adjoins the Broadway
Commercial Area It makes sense to both myself and to the Owner of 1224 Paloma to
make the obvious change to an R-2 designation since both properties are close to
transportation corridors @l Camino & California Drive) as well as public transportation
(Cal-Train and Sam-Trans). Employment opportunities exist on Broadway and some of
its side streets and are within walking distance.
As far back as anyone can remember the properfy located atl226-1228 Paloma
has been a duplex. The floor plan of both trnits appear to be original, in that no floor plan
changes were made to convert a single family residence into a duplex.
Carl DeQuant who lives next door to me grew up in the house he currently lives in
and stated that 1226-1228 Paloma was always a duplex.
I purchased the building in the early 80's from Jack Linville, who was born and
raised in Surlingams, He stated that he bought the property in the early 50's and that it
was a duplex at that time and to his knowledge had always been a duplex.
We ask your consideration ofthis request and hope that you find it in the best
interest of the City of Burlingame.
RECEIVED
Nov 1 I 2001
CITY OF"BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
J,Deal
x 7
Nwember 13, 2001
1224-1228n225-1229 PALOMA AVEI{UE, 1225-1229 LAGIINA AyENUE, AI\D 1224-1228
CAPUCHINO AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDruM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND REZONING
FROM R-r (STNGLE FAMTLY DWELLTNGS) TO R-2 (DUPLEX DWELLTNGS) (JERRY DEAL,
APPLICANT; JERRY DEAL, MARGARET JOSCHER, BELINDA AND NICHOLAS CAIRUS, ALDO
AND LOU ANN GHIOZZT, MARK AND TERESA DASZYNSKI, ELENORE LINDQUIST, RON AND
DAVINA DRABKIN. AND ALBERT A.MEYER-PROPERTY SWNERS)
Reference staffreport, I1.13.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the staff report, reviewed the
action and the staff comments. Commissioners asked if the number ofparcels proposed to be rezoned was
fixed. Staffnoted that plaruring laws do not allow "spot" planning e.g. the change of land use designation
and implementing zoning of a single or small group of lots within a larger areawith a dif[erent zoning; one
of the issues in this request is how many parcels constitute a meaningful transition area between the higher
density multiple family R-3 area and the adjacent single family R-l area. Have we created an R-2 (duplex)
overlay zone any where in the city? No, we have placed multiple family (R-4) zoning over commercial
zoning to encourage transitions from commercial uses to residential uses and have created mixed use zones
with residential and commercial uses on the same lot. C. Key noted that she received called from two
residents in the area Banlkowsky and Bukelman regarding this item, she referred them to the Planning
Department. There were no other questions/comments from the Commission.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing asking the audience to keep their comments to tlree minutes.
Jerry Deal, owner of 1226-1228 Paloma, an existing nonconforming duplex, presented the general plan
amendment and rezoning request. He noted that the city has taken a number of actions since 1990 to allow
improvements to nonconforming second units including the new second unit amnesty ordinance, but his
duplex, although built in 1923, does not qualiff under any of these provisions. His personal needs have
changed and his family has grown, he would like to continue to live there and enlarge the first floor unit to
create a dining room. There were a couple of choices open, one was that he and his neighbor to the south
ask to be rezoned R-3 since they are adjacent to existing R-3 zoning; another was that the two lots be
rezoned R-2, but stafftold him that this was "spot" land use change; another choice was to create a transition
" I and use between the existing R-3 and R- I zoning using R-2 or duplex zoning. He felt that the R-3 multiple
family option would not be good for the neighborhood, so went with the transition R-2 choice. He became
aware today of a petition prepared and signed by his neighbors and noted in response that this proposal
would affect 6 parcels on three streets for a total maximum of 6 new units; that this proposal would not
substantially increase traffic, the reason traffic is bad on the street is the proximity of the Broadway
commercial area; the parking on street would not be firrther impacted because the on-site parking
requirements for duplexes is greater than for single family houses, so development as duplexes would
increase the offstreet parking opportunities in the area, in addition because of parking requirements and lot
size the largest duplex unit which would be built would have two bedrooms, single family houses would
probably be larger; there has been no documentation presented to establish that the rezoning of these 8
parcels will negatively affect the value of the single family homes in the area and he does not believe that to
be true; finally, this would not represent a permanent change to this stable neighborhood, it would create a
maximum of 6 units over the distance of three streets; the proposal works toward the community goals of
more housing within walking distance of shopping and transit, it is what the city should do; it is important to
understand just how limited this request is; also this is not proposal to remove any existing houses or add
any more dwelling units at this time, would like to extend the breakfast nook (6'-5.5') in a first floor existing
unit of a duplex to make a dining room. He have never built or developed a property for sale in Burlingame,
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 13,2001
he intends to live on the site. Would be happy to have the commission reduce the area to be rezoned down
to his and his neighbor to the south's properties.
Commenting from the floor were: Akia Devasbt, 1236 Paloma; Linda Field, 1249 Paloma; Jeff Stevens,
1244 Paloma; Paulette Sudono, 1247 Paloma; Ash McNeily, 1236 Paloma; Allan Banlkowsky, 1304
Lincoln; Tom Starr, 1233 Paloma; Mary Carson, 1200 Lincoln;Liza, Verbertile, Capuchino; Debby
Dequants, 1232Palom4 Renee Harold, 1235 Paloma; Skip Braun, 1228Lag;rira; Debbie St. Brilo, 1245
Laguna; Mark Zuckerman,l2SS Laguna; Amanda Kargill, l24l Lagna; Manny Gomez, 1235 Paloma;
Aileen Mayer, 1228 Caplchino; Susa Rano, l232Capnchino; Anna Marales, l2ls,Capuchino, Mike Gail,
1237 Lagwra; Bill Hoskinson , 1209 Lincoln; Laurie Banlkowsky , 1304 Lincoln. Issues discussed were: not
object to applicants need for more space, but in 19 years living on Paloma have seen the sense of quite,
quaint neighborhood decrease because of the increase in traffic, children cannot play on the front lawn, real
litter problem from many users, parking in use all the time by the commercial users during the day and the
residents at night; the change in zoning would make the applicant's site more saleable and someone else
might build to full potential of R-2; change in zoning would have big impact on narrow street and lower the
vafue of the existing single family houscs, tho negative declaration should be questioned and the low density
land use designation and R-l zoning retained; neighborhood is united against this change in zoning,
concerned when purchased home that it was in a solidly single family area, duplexes would decrease the
value, sees this as a benefit to a few to the detriment of many; lot of negative changes in this area in the past
2l years, the appearance of the block changes and improves now at Jerry Deal's units, okay to change one or
two properties but not more, concerned that change would move down the block, on-site tandem parking is
inconvenient so people park on the street, need to consider the quality of life of the tax payers, living close
to commercial area has its good and bad benefits; think spot zoning Jerry Deals site is okay, not want to see
bigger with more renters in the neighborhood, people who don't care about property maintenance or
appearance, there is a new base of homeowners in this area and they should be protected.
Comment from the floor continued: this would change the character ofthis neighborhood, adding 6 units on
these properties would double the number of people living on these lots, to okay a petition arciund, it
demonstrates the grass roots opinion and 99 people are opposed; concerned that this change will result in
loss of pride of ownership in the area, once the zoning is changed cannot go back; bought an R-l house and
expect to live in an R-l zoned horro. to change it is a serious matter, it will change the neighborhood
character; there is no application to build on these 8 lots now but there could be in the future, Capuchino is
particularly impacted bymultiple familyunits, notjust commercial parking in the daytime butrenters onEl
Camino Real park on the street at night, this results in lots of litter and pests; live next door to Jerry Deal,
concemed that when he no longer lives there the property will be rebuilt and will loose privacy of their
house; have owned two different houses in the neighborhood, am flabbergasted with this request; such as
change in zoning and land use will change the neighborhood; parking limit in area is two hours but police do
not have enough manpower to enforce, have personal experience with selling a car; concerned that
intensifuing development in this area will result in tree removal; looked at 8 properties, six of the eight have
new lawns, 5 new landscaping, 2 single family houses are not maintained, do not want to reward these by
increasing the zoning; children cannot ride bicycles because with the on street parking from the apartments
and cars exiting driveways there is no visibility, Capuchino already looks bad, big apartment builclings and
small single family houses, a mish-mash of inconsistent architectural styles; what is the applicant's "or""*now about his property being nonconforming, has been for a long time, he needs to follow the rules, not
destroy the neighborhood; there has been a lot of change in this area, traffic has changed with an increase in
residents and guests with a greater impact over the past 10 years than expected on Laguna; applicant needs to
explain how the change in zoning will enhance and protect the neighborhood character, protect the values of
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 13,2001
the existing homes and make the neighborhood a safer place; protested making Laguna one-way and now
the traffic travels much faster, protested massage parlor one-half block away, the impact of this action has
not been thought through duplexes are big; have listened tonight to long discussions about 3 feet in height,
this rezoning is a significant attack should be considered in detail; live in house inherited from parents, she
looking forward to moving in an maintaining the house, now it will be rezoned, did not agree, am concemed
about the domino effect of this action.
Comments continued: did a survey of the first blocks zoned R-l on Capuchino, east side of the street she
occupies the only single family house in a group of multiple family structures, the survey results were:74
rental units (34 two bedroom, 31 one bedroom, 7 studio), two in-law units, I I single family - total 85
dwelling units; think there are enough rentals, in addition there is a 12 unit condominium which was
installed despite the protests of the neighbors, what is the minimum number of lots needed to qualiff the
transition R-2 area and can Capuchino be left out; if city would just allow Jerry Deal to have his addition, the
city could avoid all this protest; live in house on Capuchino, have teen aged children with 4 cars to the
household, others will too, need to park on street but can't because people who work for the airlines and
who work on Broadway park on the street, along with people who live in me apartments on El Camino;
negative declaration notes the project does not propose development butthe rezoning would cause the single
family houses to become duplexes which will result in a change in character in the area over time, with
current uses given Jerry's duplex and the 5 unit aparhnent building plus 8 units there are 13 units now, with
the rezoning and conversion there would be 19 units in the area; next step will be to continue the R-2 zone
transition to the lots on Rhinette facing that R-3 zoned area; believe renters are less likely to park on-site;
over the years the quality of life in Burlingame has been reduced by an increase in traffic, people and density
along El Camino Real, request for two new apartments on Paloma next to Broadway now your are
continuing to af[ect the quality of life.
Chairman Vistica asked if the applicant would like to comment: Applicant noted that originally asked to
rezone his property and his neighbor's to the south from R-l to R-2 city noted that since there was no
contiguous R-2 zoning this was "spot" zoning and more properties needed to be included; whathe wants is
to make his duplex built in 1924 made conforming so that he can add on to it. There were no further
comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: do not know how this grouping ofproperties was decided upon, but know that the
Commission cannot spot zone, noted the causes of nonconformity, feel that the parcels on Capuchino should
not be included because the area is already impacted from the R-3 zoning on the El Camino side of the street,
the street is narrow and one way and impacted with on-street parking because of the pattem of zoning and
development of older apartmentbuildings along El Camino builtwithdifferent on-siteparkingrequirements;
understand that a pattem not a spot is required for rezoning but want to protect the neighborhood; cannot
support this change because it would have a negative impact on the neighborhood, feel that there must be
some creative way short of rezoning to assist the applicant; agree that parcels on Capuchino should be
exempted, since the 2 nonconforming uses are on Paloma perhaps the rezoning can be limited to the four
properties on Palom4 single family value can be affected if residents in duplex use on-site parking for
storage or if both units are renter occupied; the problem being addressed by this request began twenty years
ago, change has occurred in the Broadway area, should note that it is an important feature that a city is a
living being and modifies itself or it dies; do not know multiple family development would damage this areq
know people have come out in part to protect themselves and in part to protect the city; the system is
working, all have been heard but that does not mean planning will benefit all; with people living there
change will occur, appears that transit corridors on the Peninsula will make a greater impact on housing,
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 13,2001
Broadway is at typical transit center, need to think into the future. It is the natural evolution of cities that the
density in this area close to shopping, pedestrian activity, transportation will increase, the ultimate fate of
the area around Broadway is more urban and less suburban, it is just not time for this change to happen yet;
the Planning Commission represents the values of the community and while the state has mandated the city
to find place for additional housing, this is not the location at this time; appreciate the involvement of these
neighbors and hope that they continue to be involved and stating community values on planning issues in
other areas, feel that the current R-l zoning is probably appropriate for this location in these special
circumstances.
Commission comment continued: CA Anderson noted that in California it is not possible to grant a variance
to the allowed uses in a zoning district; commission could change the definition orregulations around non-
conforming uses, but this change would aflect all properties in the city; the Commission could review the
second unit amnesty ordinance and provide for circumstances such as this; Commission can also define how
many lots need to be included in each circumstance to create a meaningful transition or area with a single,
and different, zoning designation. A Commissioner noted would like to consider the four lots on
rlaloma./Laguna as being sufficient to establish an R-2 transition zone (1228-1224 Paloma, 1229-1225
Laguna) the result of this rezoning would be to add a net of two dwelling units with maximum build out.
C. Bojues moved to recommend denial of the request to change the zoning designation from R-l to R-2 on
the 8 parcels suggested on the north side of Broadway; suggest that city explore revisions to the second unit
amnesty progftrm or other ways to address nonconforming units such as this. C. Auran secondedthe motion.
Comments on the motion: what is the process from here; CP Monroe noted that the applicant can go
forward with Commission's recommendation to City Council for action, can modiff his request within
suggestions made by the Commission, or can withdraw his request for the rezoning. CA Anderson noted
that it seemed to be a consensus of the Commission that the existing density of development was sufficiently
dense on Capuchino, that to add more density there would be unwise, so the two parcels on Capuchino
should be dropped from the rezoning request.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the recommendation that the request for the rezoning of eight
parcels adjacent to the R-3 zone on the north side of Broadway be rezoned from R-l to R-2. The motion for
a negative recommendation passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent) voice vote.
Commissioners suggested four lots might be considered to create an adequate transition zoning unit, suggest
that Council consider looking at modiffing the second unit ordinance to address this type of issue in existing
long time nonconforming duplex developments. It is up to the applicant if he wishes to proceed with this
rezoning request. The neighbors will be noticed if this item is scheduled for Council action. This item
concluded at l0:12 p.m.
Chairman Vistica called for a break. The Commission reconvened at 10.28 p.m.
8. 1838 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 111 - ZONED C.I_ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A (MARYJ.WONG, PROPERTY
Reference staffreport, I l. I 3.01, with Monroe
Staff comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration.
9
the criteria and
November 13,2001
?arrrned oltl4/v k o{arna*-'o*
d€ Paot&t '
trlo{or
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
Burlingamg Ca 94010
Re: Rezoning of 1224-122811225-1229 Paloma Ave.,l225-l229Lagona Ave., & 1224-
1228 Capuchino Ave.
Dear Comissioners,
I am opposed to the rezoning of the above listed properties. I am the owner occupant of
1232 Capuchino Ave and have lived there since l98l.Ifthis proposal is passed I would
be the lone single house between the 2 proposed sites and2 current houses with in-law
units (1236-1238 &1240). There ac only eight remaining R-l sites on the east side of
the block. Considering that the entire west side of the block is zoned R-3 with multiunits
on all but one lot, the idea of adding more housing to this block is intolerable. As it is
parking is impossible.
Our block has already had the addition of a 12 unit condo complex despite the protests of
the residents. Most ofthe older apartment units have parking for only one car so that
leaves the second car on the street. There are 4 beauty salons on this block with many
patrons parking on Capuchino. The property at 1204 has a beauty shop downstairs, 4
units above with no parking.
To support my position I have taken a survey of my block. There we74 rental units, 34
of which are 2bdrn4 31 lbdrntT studios, and two in law units, totaling 85 housing units.
In comparison Paloma has two s-unit buildings, one 3-unit, Mr Deal's duplex, and 18
single family homes, totaling 33 housing units.
In closing I have a few questions forthe commission. When proposing azorungchange
is there a minimum number of lots to be included ? Or is there a minimum amount of
square footage? Is it possible to just leave Capuchino Ave. out ofthe proposal? Is it
legal to include somebody's property despite their objection?
Sincerely
Susan Ronnow
%CilJId
lr ala{"o"
trfrs
Adil6
November 12, 2OO1 lot
CITYOFBUBUNGAME
Planning Department
City Hall - 501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, California 94010
RE: Rezoning ol 1224-122811225-1229 Paloma Avenue, 1125-1229 Laguna Avenue, and
1 224-1 22A Capuchino Avenue
Dear Commissioners:
The purpose of this letler is to formally state my objection to the rezoning of the properties
located on capuchino, Paloma, and Laguna Avenues, Burlingame. As a resident-owner of property
being directly affected, my reasons for obiecting are as lollows:
Congestion/Density - At the present time, the congestion in this area is severe due to
several apartment complexes and multiple dwellings. To increase the density by allowing
additional multi-tamily housing or multiple dwellings would be to exacerbate the congestion
beyond what could be considered reasonable. I am requesting an Environmental lmpact Report
to be completed prior to any decision to approve rezoning.
Traffic and Parking - Currently, the blocks in mention are narrow, one-way stredi.
A parking problem already exlsts due to the off-Broadway parking and the parking by the
current multFdwelling residents and their guests. Homeowners are challenged to enter or
exit their own driveways. To increase this limited capacity with additional density housing
is counter to prop€r planning goals of city properties. I am requesting that a Traffic study
be completed prior to any decision to approve rezoning.
Neighborhood Atmosphere - lt is my understanding that the ratio of building to lot size on
R2 property is signilicantly greater than on R1-zoned lots. Also, it is my understanding that
lhere is no design review for multi-lamily building. Unlike Rl and commercial building,
lhere is no review of architecture for compatibility to the neighborhood. As a homeowner and
resident o, Burlingame, it is my wish that we retain the residential neighborhood nature
which 'is' Burlingame.
R2 zoning to meet Mr. Deal's needs is not derinitive tor others in lhe future who may choose to
build dilferently. He is not just asking lor R2 rezoning in his own small area of concem, but
is involving a broader area o, Capuchino, Laguna, and Paloma. This is my objection. At this
time, in Burlingame, there ls an abundance of vacancies for rent and for lease as well as
homes waiting to be sold. I am a third generation resident of Burlingame and do not agree
that this rezoning'will be a positive step for the city as a whole and [or] for our properties..
l, along with many of my neighbors, request the denial of this rezoning.
Sincerely,
Alene J Meyer, current owner/resident ot 1228 Capuchino, Burlingame, CA 9401
(Albert A Meyer is my deceased lalher) . ftr,,] fr-r)Aa ffiVu^- ao-a-*/4ff2.--*,+1 -lt t tr,,..t t-2,-Z-:,.
o,ra
A/-r-,* $ rr7-u-
Item Received
After Preparation
ofpacket
November 12,2OO1
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
City Hall
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010-3997
Dear Plann ing Department,
I am writing to say that I heartily disagree with your Negative Declaration related to
changing the general plan from low density residential to medium density
residential and rezoning from R-l to R-2 for a number of single family dwellings on
Paloma Avenue, Capuchino Avenue and Laguna Avenue. As someone who has
iived in a single dwelling home on Paloma Avenue for 19 years, ! believe there
would be significant negative effect on the environment in which my family lives
because of this action. I know that most of my neighbors feel the same way.
Over the last 19 years, I have watched Paloma Avenue become more and more
crowded, with more parking and more vehicular and pedestrian traffic each year. I
have two children, ages '10 and 7, and have never found it safe to allow them to
play in the front yard because of all the car and foot traffic. There is a general
feeling of encroachment on our quiet neighborhood from big overbuilt structures
that are not in keeping with the architectural styles and scope of the existing houses.
Thg concomitant traffic, crowding, noise and litter that results from squeezing more
people into less space has a detrimental effect on our daily lives, not to mention a
depressive effect on the value of our homes.
I strongly urge you to disallow this amendment and let our neighborhood retain
whatever charms it has left.
Item # 7 General Plan Amendment
PCMeeting - 11.13.2001
1224 - 1228 I 1225 - 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225-1229 Laguna Avenue &
1224- 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Elisa ian
1236 Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 344-28s1
a
RECE'VED
NOV L ? 'tit{.11
a,;l -'.,' ,",.i ,iMEI L^,,i.r... _ i.rCpf.
Item Received
After Preparation
ofpacket
November 12,2001
City of Burlingame
Planning Department
City Hall
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010-3997
Dear Plann ing Department,
I am writing to say that I heartily disagree with your Negative Declaration related to
changing the general plan from low density residential to medium density
residential and rezoning from R-1 to R-2 for a number of single family dwellings on
Paloma Avenue, Capuchino Avenue and Laguna Avenue. As someone who has
lived in a single dwelling home or Paloma Avenue for 13 years, I believe there
would be significant negative effect on the environment in which my family lives
because of this action. I know that most of my neighbors feel the same way.
Over the last 13 years, I have watched Paloma Avenue become more and more
crowded, with more parking and more vehicular and pedestrian traffic each year. I
have two children, ages 10 and 7 , and have never found it safe to allow them to
play in the front yard because of all the car and foot traffic. There is a general
feeling of encroachment on our quiet neighborhood from big overbuilt structures
that are not in keeping with the architectural styles and scope of the existing houses.
The concomitant traffic, crowding, noise and litter that results from squeezing more
people into less space has a detrimental effect on our daily lives, not to mention a
depressive effect on the value of our homes.
I strongly urge you to disallow this amendment and let our neighborhood retain
whatever charms it has left.
Sincere ly,
Item # 7 General Plan Amendment
PCMeeting - 11.13.2001
1224 - 1228 I 1225 - 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 -1229 Laguna Avenue &
1224 - 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Ash
123
ly
6 Pal oma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94O1O
(6so) 344-28s1
Nov-Og-O1 01:5BP
OM L NEIGHBO
'l-here is currenrly before the Planning Comrnission a request to change the zoning on
(8) propenies from R-l to an R-2 designation. The properries affected are
1225 Laguna (currenrly a four unit apartment building)
1229l-aguna
1224 Paloma
1225 Paloma
1226-1228 Paloma (currentty a duplei builr in approx. I924)
1229 Paloma
1224 Capuchino
1228 Capuchino
The proposal would allow a building with a maximum of two units and no more on
each parcel. This is not an apartrnent building or condominium proposal. Each2 bedroom
unit would be required to have (two) coverd ollstneer parking spaces. Therefore a properry
developed with two 2 bedroom units would need four covered offstreet parking spaces, This
requirement is much more suingent than what is required for a single family rcsidence where
only one covered off steet parking space for a four bedrobm house is required. Due to this
stringent requirement the proposed zone change would not cause an on street parking
problem,
There are no proposals begun or even contemplated to remove a1y existing houses.
We must however plan our cities for the funue and this very limited amount of duplex's near
the Broadway Commercial Area makes sense as it places housing close to shopping and
publ ic transportation.
My property at 1226-1228 Paloma is not for sale, and I have no plans to sell in the
future. I recently married and together we have 5 children and 5 grand children. Currently I
am forbidden from making any additions to my building as it's an existing duplex in a R-l
zone. Our only funue goal is to possibly extend the breakfast nook 0o cseate a dining room.
Currently it is almost impossible to have the family over for diners such as Thanksgiving and
Christmas.
I was a member of the Burlingame Planning Commission for I I years and had a
consistent pas of voting against overbuilding and letting developers
Item Received
After Preparation
ofpacket
P-02
Item # 7 General Plan Amendment
PCMeeting - 11.13.2001
1224 - 1228 I 122 5 - 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225-1229 Laguna Avenue &
1224-1228 Capuchino Avenue
run our towl. Ygs, I
is a reasonable rcquestvoted against condomini
that will not any major impacts on the neighborhood.
Thank you,REC I:\IED
NO\/ 1 3 2001
CITY CI- r :.iilr-iNGAME
PLANiT; rG DEPT.
J,D
Jerry Deal, Owner
1226-1228 Paloma
I hope lhis clears up some confuiion brought to my aoention. I will be at 650-343-6014 all
day Tuesday No{ember 13fr and would be happy to talk ro anyone interested.
Item Received
After Preparation
ofpacket
November 12,2001
The City of Burlingame
Planning Department
City Hall/501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Attention:Planning Department
Intent to Adopt A'Negative Declaration
to Rezone from R-l to R-2
for Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues
Item # 7 General Plan Amendment
PCMeeting - 11.13.2001
Rv#E{wtr":*:TAvenue
1224 - 1228 C apuchino Avenue
Not/ 1 3 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
RE:
Please find enclosed a Petition signed by ninety-nine (99) people opposing the
adoption of a Negative Declaration to Rezone Properties from R-l to R-2 on
Paloma, Laguna and Capuchino Avenues.
We would ask the Planning Commission to take the time to review the addresses
of those who signed this Petition. As residents of this neighborhood, we will all
be negatively effected by the proposed rezoning changes.
The neighborhood stands as one in opposing this measure!
We look forward to seeing you on the 13th of Novernber at 7:00 p.m.
you.'ilL\Srntors/q
Susan Alan Bonkowski
1304 Lincoln Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
phone - 343-0129
o
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-1 Zone District to the R-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 P aloma Avenue
1225 &. 1229 P aloma Avenue
1225 &. 1229 l-agmaAvenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential units (Duplex
Units) in the Project Area.
Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one waY streets.
\r'rn ta lv\cG nt l3o5 Ltncol
1
2
2.
J.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.\l0 0
L5 LO
(Ar t0rn4 lr ()0l
rt t0 nl
0
IrE. t
t*eL ^ 'N
d15
tha-
-o
w t,
l(ol
3. Limited Parking SPaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house'
5. Would permanently change the "stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Sisrature Print Name Address Date
@
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the P.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 PalomaAvenue
1225 & 1229 l-agwaAvenue
t224 & 1228 Capwhino Avenue
Properties as it:
Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units (Duplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
I
5
Sisnature
9
I
I
I
1
I
'( &w*oo
,D,
(/a-/omo N v, l0/ JaoJ
.za, 2oo f
o
0.
1.
2.
3.
I
/252-o l,,r^aL ,,/^.4 //46 _.
o/o,lfu<.,y',
S-vry /.?CPa/onr 4,s""e' t nfo 1
?0
/.*5
fwa-/1.^,,'-'
15.
tux
t7.€a ffi^trr tatp PatrMa $uu. ,/ol,
Print Name Address Date
tl'g
I
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the R.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 P aloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 l-agnaAvenue
1224 & 1228 Capwhino Ave,nue
Properties as it:
Aliows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
Limited Parking Spaces.
Decreases property value of the current single house.
Would permanently change the "Stable Urban'Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Address Date
?-l L tt o o
@
J
4
5
;.
SiCnature
16.
17.
l8
t9
20
2t
22
\rO
ol
0
to A F,* ll4q Pltou A (E !rbJvB Pa 0 tl 0
E "lo/,,
PrintName
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the R-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 I-agana Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units (Duplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
I
5 Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Print Name Date
23
24
25
26
27
28
J 70+a8
Lr/tC2-
nh29.
1t o n(
Sigrrature Address
t/
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 P aloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Lagana Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capwhino Avenue
Properties as it:
l. Allows forthe addition ofup to 6 (six) Residential Units Q)uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Sienature Print Name Address Date
51.
5
il /,*-/a/t,/0,
6t
i\
ol
I
57.
ll I'
tO
of
I
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the R.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
1. ' Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would pexmanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name 'Address Date
30.ubt L la r)€, ticl
31.
32 Dc)r'tt'tA J.,Je- I Lf b ff1/6 ti.t<)
l:p r
6
^1o--0 |33.
34.
35.
36.
11 -r o-o I
Ir-l o'-D I
1L{6 L*
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-1 Zone District to the B.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
&25 &1229 tagunaAvenue
1224 & 1228 Capwhino Avenue
1. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Sisnature Print Name Address
E)^.o f.e\\
2
5
37.
38.
qocr.
$4/-
t)-13
t&.L)rl I
o
I
(,/
6
t I
*eftt:
(t
Properties as it:
Date
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 &,1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
l. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units (Duptex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases properly value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name Address Date
47.
48.
-Dt
49.
50.
We, the undersigned oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
1. Allows'for the addition of upto 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name Address Date
o
()0
61.
62.
63.
64.
ol
g111s.s { >fi,c${t uo t 6l
tw
YYt;-t*-a*'Na
L Crye$lrv o' (
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the B.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & t229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
l. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (sii) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permane,ntly change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name Address Date
{6
68.
Eit ,,lo t
t I
,0 I
I
t/o I
69.
70.
71.
tl
t)a .
A fNoL
12./,r0 j 6l il-l
&
zJ
l,l
I
ll,
We, the undersigre4 oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the P.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, t226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 &.1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
l. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases properly value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name Address Date
72.,d.t rK /rprror*o t/1,s
73
74.
75.
76
77.
78.
o ?Lr +/l-ta-,til4
\\-6-11
of ,,y'r/or
!
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 I-agna Ave,nue
1224 & 1228 Captchino Avenue
Properties as it:
l. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffrc area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Sigrrature Address
79.
80.
8
H €RBe}Zf BaK lZ lq ( AAtJctl,' ,tto ft - to
c- 6y)
82.bncoln *u
00. Lool
8
8 Il*o*
g.r,A
I ?oo ]alont," ll tto u, /oot
Print Name Date
C
/o-t1
t
85.
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the R-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 P aloma Avenue
1225 &l229lagnaAvenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
1. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (srx1 Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
Limited Parking Spaces.
Decreases propefy value of the current single house.
Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
J
4
5
Sigrature
P[it;fr1,"l,li( cq (n Bof
'
41,/-"(100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
to
o
o L rlr4c
S/Srh,Stffi 0r)L*t lSot uNu Buttufwr(+
I I iltu, ,n
)n-I
/{3.tEf,s t
uN@ ' At/u
rN6p N
l3
Print Name Address Date
We, the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-l Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
1. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units @uplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Signature Print Name Address Date
tzt.
122.
lissa en {
1
t24 r(L
125.
126.
127.
ot
\Z /ot
fi o
Wg the undersigned, oppose the Negative Declaration, General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning from the R-1 Zone District to the F.-2 Zone
District for the:
1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 & 1228 Capuchino Avenue
Properties as it:
1. Allows for the addition of up to 6 (six) Residential Units (Duplex
Units) in the Project Area.
2. Increases an already congested traffic area - Paloma &
Capuchino are one way streets.
3. Limited Parking Spaces.
4. Decreases property value of the current single house.
5. Would permanently change the "Stable Urban Area" of this
Neighborhood.
Print Name Address Date
t2 L (/z
I o
I 30.
131.
132.
133.
134.
II
Item Received
After Preparation
ofpacket
Item # 7 General Plan Amendment
PCMeeting - 11.13.2001
1224-12281 1225-1229 Paloma Avenue
1225-1229 Laguna Avenue &
1224 - 1228 Capuchino AvenueCity of Burlingame
Planning Department
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, Ca.94010
November 10,2001
Attn: Planning Department
DELIVER PRIOR TO MEETING AT 7:OOPM, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13,
To Whom It May Concem:
I strongly urge you to reconsider your amendment to the "General Plan". I am the owner
of 1245 Paloma Avenue. Single family homes dominate the block at this time. I urge
you to leave the "General Plan" as it stands. Changing only a few lots lowers the value
on the single-family homes. If you are confused by that thought..... think if the city you
live in changed Y, of your block to multifamily and left your half single family. If y*
feel there is a shortage of dwellings, I suggest you change the entire block to the next
intersection. To make Y, achange is not fair to the single family homeowners. By
changing the entire block you at least offer the choice of the single family owner to move
and sell to an investor since I believe they will be the "potential buyer" if you change the
Gtineral Plan as you describe.
Brosnan
P.O. Box 329
Burlingame, Ca. 94011
(6s0) 343-1448
RECEIVED
Nov 1 3 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
November 9, 2001
From: Ronald & Linda Field
1249 Paloma Ave.
Burlingame, CA 94010
To: Members of the Burlingame City Council & Planning Commission
Burlingame City Hall
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: lntent to Adopt a Negative Declaration conceming the General Plan Amendment for
rezoning 1224-122811225-1229 Paloma Ave., 1225-1229 Laguna Ave., and 1224-1228
Capuchino Ave.
Dear City Council/Planning Commission Member:
As residents and homeowners on the 1200 block of Paloma Ave., we are opposed to thei
adoption of a negative declaration concerning the general plan amendment being considered
by the planning commission and the city councilto rezone from R1 (single family residential) to
R2 (duplex dwellings) at 1224-122811225-1229 Paloma Ave., 1225-1229 Laguna Ave., and
1224-1228 Capuchino Ave., thus changing the areas mentioned from low density residential to
medium density residential.
We believe the conclusion that the proposed changes would have liftle or no negative impact
on our neighborhood is incorrect. The following very significant negative changes would occur:
-traffic will be increased on already busy, narrow streets;
-competition for limited on-street parking will increase;
-and the property values of nearby single-family homes will be lowered
Much of Burlingame's charm lies in the unique character of its neighborhoods. Changes such
as the one proposed threaten the very qualities that aftract people to our town and create
property values which are among the highest on the peninsula.
We urge you to reject this negative declaration concerning the general plan amendment and to
retain low density housing and Rl zoning rating in the areas mentioned above.
fi*. /7 -rt'
DISTRIBUTION:
$gitycouncil JU!* pteaserespond
(City Managpr / )
6 City Attomey o No Resfonse Required
O Dir. Financc
Sincerely,
! city Rl.nn"t
lh Dir. public works
D Human Resources
O Potice Chief
0 Fire Chief
D Parks&Rec
O Librarian
Ncxt Agenda
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR
RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK
P
&"e
Ronald R. Field
Linda L. Field
ITEM RECEIVED AFTER PREPARATION
OF PACKET
Betty
Ivlark Zuckennan
1233lagumAvc.
TTENI {17 - 1224-L228 I 1225-L229Paloma
1225-1229 Laguna Avenue
PC Meeting - 11.13.01
Nove,nrber 4, 2001
/
tltvlembers of the Pl4rrn'ry Cormissbn
Merrbers oftk City Council
501 Primrose Road
Brnlirgarue, CA 94010
REr Rezoning Capchino, Pabma, & t"oguos Aves'
Dcar Plaplng Cormfosbn & Crry Council Members:
lVe hve fgad ad heard about the *straight lins'zoniry ste?s for ths 1200 bhcks of
Capuchino, Pabtm fid t^og3ma Avenrrcs. This docs mt make s€ilIlc in our
*ihUorto.a. This um rmot stand additbrnlhousing. ?utdng is ahody ditrcuh
d,nhg th day and arytire ontb wekends. Furtkr' the twelw hrmdrd block of
i;,g& erre.-lsmainly a migbborbod conslsting of singb fudlty oyr
-ocd
tnrsing. ry
*J*ny chikl,en residins ol tm stroet wtro will mt tenem ft,om firtbr overt'rowding
ad additbmlhatrc ad-prking. This is ju$ anexauryle ofu&at canoccur ifreroning
becoups a realitY.
We hope you as mnbers ofth clry gor€rffid 1lll:* tht thb rccormendation does
not berefit those o,to rerre in this mlshb"fhood" Let's lenocmber that thb is also a
o*igtborto"a ofsingb fudty dwcflin$ and urc need to keep it tbat way'
Thank you for yogr consklerdiou We rvill dtend th fhffi1firry Cornmission meetiog on
Norrcmber l3o.
',rli,W
City of Burlingame
Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
from the R-I Zone District to the R-2 Zone District
Item No.
Action
Address:1224, 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 & 1229 Lagvra Avenue
1224 &,1228 Captchino Avenue
Meeting Date: llll3l0l
Request: Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from low
density residential to medium density residential and Rezoning from the R-l zone district to the R-2 zone
district (C.S. 25. 16.01).
Applicant: Jerry Deal APNs: 026-095-080, -090, -230 & -240;
026-094-080, -090- -2gg & -2L_0
Property Owners: Jerry Deal, Margaret Joscher, Belinda & Nicholas Caims, Aldo & Lou Ann Ghiozzi,
Mark & Teresa Daszynski, Elenore Lindquist, Ron & Davina Drabkin, Albert Meyer
Lot Area: 8 lots, 6000 SF each, total area:48,000 SF
General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-l
Adjacent Development: Single Family Residences and Apartments; Commercial Development along
Broadway
CEQA Status: Refer to Negative Declaration No. 516-P
Summary: The applicant is requesting that eight properties located on Laguna, Paloma and Capuchino
Avenue be rezoned from the R-l zone dishict to the R-2 zone district. In order to accomplish that rezoning,
the general plan land use designation must also be changed from the low density residential to the medium-
low density residential designation. The project area consists of eight parcels. Six of these parcels are now
developed with single family homes. There is a duplex on thc parcel at 1226- 1228 Paloma Avenue which
would become a conforming use if the zoning designation is approved. There is a nonconforming 4-unit
aparhnent building at 1225 Laguna Avenue which would continue to be nonconforming. There is no
development proposed as a part of this application, but the change in zoning would allow for the addition of
six dwelling units to this area.
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning: The project area is designated in the General Plan as low density
reside,ntial and is zonedR-l. The request is to change the land use designation from low density residential
to medium density residential and to rezone the area from R-l to R-2. The low density residential land use
designationprovides for single farnily residential uses at densities ofup to 8 units per acre. Most ofthe single
family residential subdivision in the flat areas of Burlingame are developed at densities of between 5 andT
units per acre. The medium density residential land use designation, which allows development at between
9 and 20 units per acre, is meant to be occupied by duplexes and one and two story garden aparhent
developments. The R-l district allows development of one house per parcel. The R-2 zone diskict allows
development of two units on each lot, the lower end of the medium density residential land use designation.
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
The applicant originally requested that two properties (1224 and 1226-1223PaTomaAvenue) be rezoned from
R-l to R-2. State Planning Law discourages the use of "spot" land use changes for a single lot or two
surrounded by a different zoning disffict. This application includes eight adjoining parcels which lie between
an area zonedR-3 and the R-l zoned area. Owners of six of the eight properties have agreed to the rezoning
request. It should be noted that the property manager for the parcel at 1225 Laguna, developed with a four-
unit apartment building, has requested that this property be rezoned to the R-3 zone diskict. This request is
not included in this application because it would be considered a "spot" land use change for the one parcel.
Impact of Rezoning and General Plan Change: With the rezoning of the area from R-l to R-2, the
nonconforming duplex at 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue would become a legal use. The four-unit apartnent
building would retain its nonconforming status. Although no development is proposed at this time, rezoning
these parcels from R-l to R-2 zoning could result in the addition of up to 6 residential units in the project area
(assuming each of the parcels with single family houses were converted to duplex use). This could result in
a change to the character of this portion of the neighborhood over time. This change in use would also act
as a fransition area between the surrounding single family houses and the more intense multiple famili ald
commercial uses along the Broadway and El Camino Real corridors.
The Conservation Element of the Burlingame General Plan identifies this neighborhood north of Broadway
to Mills Avenue, and between El Camino Real and Califomia Drive as a "stable Urban Area". The
Conservation Element describes this area as an area primarily devoted to single family residence an notes that
the quality is good and the area should remain stable. It recommends considering a tansition to apartment
development in the southern portion of the area. This application is within the southern area discussed.
As required by State law, the City is in the process of amending the Housing Element of the Burlingame
General Plan. The State, in association withlhe Association of Bay Area Governme,lrts, has determined that
due to projected population growth the City of Burlingame needs to provide opportunities for an additional
565 housing units within its boundaries. The change in General Plan land use designation and rezoning ofthis
area to the R-2 zone district would conkibute to the accomplishment of that goal.
Negative Declaration: The initial study prepared for this project, including the General Plan amendment
il1d ls2sning of the eight parcels, identified no potential impacts on the environment, and the project can
be covered by a negative declaration since the initial study did not identiff any adverse impacts.
StaffComments: The Chief Building Inspector, the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer had no comments
on this project.
Study Meeting: At the October 22,2001Planning Commission studymeeting, the Commissioners noted that
the staffreport indicates the General Plan defines this area as a "stable urban area", will the rezoning comply
and the area remain stable after rezoning. Planning staffwould note that the Conservation Element identifies
"stable urban areas" as areas where the quality of development is good, the level of maintenance is adequate,
and there is either a single tlpe of land use or'a compatible mixture of uses. This area now fits these criteri4
and already has a compatible mixture of uses because there are other nonconforming duplexes and R-3 zoned
multiple family uses in the surrounding area. The rezoning will provide the opportunity of adding as many
as six additional dwelling units to this area. This incremental increase should not affect the overall stability
of the area or effect a significant change in traffic or other environmental effects.
-2-
General Plun Arflendment and Rezoning 1 22 6-1 228 Paloma Avenue
Commissioners also asked what type of noticing is required for these actions. The General Plan amendment
requires a newspaper notice, and the rezoning requires notice to property owners within 500 feet of the project
area. In addition, a notice of the environmental finding was posted along street frontages in this area.
Neighboring property owners were not notified of the study meeting, but will be notified directly by mail ten
days before the public hearing.
Findings for a General Plan Amendment:
In acting on the request for a general plan amendment for the change in land use designation from low
denstty residential to medium density residential, fte planning Commissioners should state the reasons why
they feel such action is appropriate. The commissioners must state why the changes are consistent with the
policies of the General Plan and in particular the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Findings for a Rezoning:
In acting on the request to rezone the properly from R-l to R-2, the Planning Commission should state the
reasons why they feel such action is appropriate and consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance.
Code Section 25.04.010 states that the zoning ordinance is established for the following purposes: to
promote public health, safety and welfare; preserve a wholesome serviceable and attractive community
which increase the safety and security of home life; promote harmonious character and economy among
property, building construction and civic services; establish regulations to limit the location, uses, height,
bulk, occupancy, lot coverage, street setback, yard sizes and occupancy of building structures and land;
encourage remodeling of existing residential structures; preserve residential neighborhood character of
single family structures and accessory structures and provide for the best general civic use to protect the
corlmon rights and interests of all.
Public Notice:
A rezoning request requires notice of the public hearing to be made to all property owners within a 500'
radius of the site instead of 3@'. In addition, because a General Plan amendment is required, this public
hearing was also noticed in The San Mateo County Times, a newspaper of general circulation.
Planning Commission Actron:
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution
and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. Ptanning Commission
action on the General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning is a recommendation to the City Council.
Maureen Brooks
Senior Planner
c:Jerry Deal, applicant U:I,SR-COMMEI I 22 6 Paloma SR.doc
-3-
CITY OF BI]RLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
October 22,200I
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
ORDER Acting Keighran called the October 2001, regular meeting ofthe
Planning
Present:
to order at7:02p.m.
Auran, Boju6s, Mink,and Keighran
Absent:Commissioners'
Keighran noted
(arrived 7:05 p.m.) and Acting Chair
Chairman Vistica was
recent death in his
Present: City Planner,Planner, Ruben
Attorney Lar"v
The of the October 9, 2A0l regular of the Planning
approved with addition to on l3l Loma Vista
Avenue,page paragraph 4, line 18 following:height; theapplicant has no respectfor the communityby
regulations and Commtssion requests; line insert: and the
Commissiora believe;inserfi such as installing less
revised Title 24 Report the roof material from
seam metal.
TV. APPROVALOFAGENDA were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There no public comments.
YI. STUDY ITEMS
ROLL
IIr.
ofa
with a
tile to
I
CP Monroe presented a sunmary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: page 2of the staffreportindicates that this area is identified in the General Plan as a "stable urban area",ivill the rezoning complyand will the area remain stable after rezoning, please clari&; is the noticiog *air, 500, or more? GeneralPlan requires newspaper publication in addition to 500' *Jiur, will also iost anotice at the site and onsurrourding light poles; the surrounding zoning is described, but notice,isome duplex dwellings in thesurrounding R-l zone; there are duplex dwellings scattered in the R-l zone, tt"y *r" built before thecurrent zoning was put in place; pleased that spot zoning has stopped, in favor of lenerat move to R-2, this isan appropriate transition zone location, near hansportation, we need housing; H#e neighbors been notified
I.
II.
City of Burlingame Platning bmmission Unapproved Minutes October22,200l
at this time? Notification to neighbors is not required for the study hearing, will send out notices to property
owners within 500' of the subject properties l0 days before the public hearing; applicant obtained consent I
from six of eight property owners, rezoning will come back to the Planning Commission as an action item,
Commission then makes a recorlmendation to City Council.
This item was set for the regular action calendar attheNovember l3,z}}l,meetingprovided all information
requested has been submitted and reviewed bythe Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
ONTHECONSENTCALENDAR TOBEROWINE. THEYARE
SIMULTANEOUSLY DISCUSSION REQU ESTED B Y TH E AP P LICANT
A OFTHEPUBLICORA PRIORTOTHETIMETHE VOTESONTHEMOTION
TO ADOP
Acting Chair askedifanyonein oronthe Commission to call anyitemoffthe
consent calendar.were no requests.
2a. 1225 CABRILLO B ZONED R.l B FOR ONE YEAR
ADDTTTON (GUSTAVO
APPLICANT A}ID D JAMES C. AND FOWLE& PROPERTY
2b.81 B APPLICATION
COND NILMEYERAND MCGUIRE
REAL PROJECTPLANNER:
C. Bojuds moved on the facts in the staff commlssroners
comments and the conditions in
resolution. The motion called for a voice vote
1225 Cabrillo 3 and the motion passed ({- Vistica
Appeal procedures
ACTION ITEM
3. 451 ROAD B ZONED R.REVIEW AND PARKING
VARIANCE
ADDITION
SUBSTANDARD SECOND STORY
SC}IEINHOLTZ,APPLICANT AND.
ARCFIITECT;AND CINDY PLANNER:
staffreport, I with attachments. CP presented the report,and
Deparhnent conditions were for consideration.ifa
isrequiredwhena garage is located a property line; CP noted that
is only when a structure is within I'ofaproperly Commission noted the
to be moved to
OF
1
R
report and by
the motion to
AL USE PERMIT FORA
APPLICANTS; AC
AYENUE,B ZOiYED C-1,
ESTATEUSE
ETAL, PROPERTY
WIDTH FOR A
TZ AS
of the consent calendar
in the staffreports with
seconded by C. Osterling.
and 1408 Chapin Avenue,
advised.
APPLICATION FOR D
PROPERTY OWNERS)
the second at the west elevation
Page -l-
so that the walls on either
on
DESIGN REVIEW FOR
YIII.
FIRST AND SECOND
cITy oF BURLTNGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRTMROSE ROAD p (650) 558-7250 F (650) 6963790
APPLICATION TO TIIE PLANNING COMMISSION
rvpeorapplication:Desisn|:Hl-Sfi l#tt"#]*i'"i#i*,*.Jrl'3zmro
Project address ILL;**e*%;'
APPLICANT
city/State/zip: N)RL,a/q ArtE, C * Q4o I 0
Phone 9o-4
N
(h)
(0
(bro ->Zy-?44 b
ARCHITECTiDESIGNER
Name:
Address:
Phone (w)
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVE
AUG 1 0 2001
DRrcErvED
(
PROPERTY OWNER CITY OF BURLINGAME
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certiff under of perjury that the information
given herein is true and to the my belief.
Applicant's signature
I know about the and hereby above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning
Z.to.ot
Property owner's
Date
PCAPP.FRM
(wt-
CiNlStatelziD:
Phone (w):
1r1ums; JrrFB y r'gAL PLANNTNG DEPr' .'H,-f^i-?^ysrJI8+.r,
pRoJECTDESCRTP',t'.tONz REz*tc v?tn Pl a h2-
ItDate: 3/ Z0 /o /
-
,n", >/zo/o t
CITY OF BT.JRLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRTMROSE ROAD p (650) 558-7250 F (650) 696-3790
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Typeofapplication:DesignReview-ConditionalUsePermitVariance-
Special Permit Other-{ Parcel
Project address lLl*Pa-\^,.,^.-flo4en,tnq
APPLICAI{T
Nane: [V, 444AQOI (oscu1Q
taaress: I?.t * 1frnme Aurft,te
Citylstatelzip:Bv At-t >! a ft pe ( 4 4 +o
Phone (w)= b50.3* b- uuq6
pg: be o' b E4' 6zt t
ff): 050 '31r+- 2l8t
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
N qme'
Phone (w)
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVED RECEIVED
(
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT,
to Phone
AUG 1 0 2001
PROPERTY OWNER CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Name: 14 hQ4AeEt doscHeQ
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
AI'FADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certiff under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Applicant's
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission.
l4LNw6 t s&{. 3lz-t lo t
Date submi o"u- 8'P 'o t
Property owner's signafure:(r -----T
PCAPP.FRM
A rlrlrpcc'4Lstu
Citylstatelzip:
A r{r{raoo.
CiwlStatelZio:
'iur^n*, ilAAff Uw lttsd,u-( e4", 3le7 lot
To:
Jerry Deal (owner)
1226-1228 Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 940f0
&
Margaret Joscher (owner)
l2}4Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
City of Burlingame
Planning Deparfrrent
Members of the Planning Commission
8-9-01
I am requesting that the properties located at 1226-1228 Paloma arfi 1224 Paloma
be rezoned from their curent R-l designation to an R-2 designation. The reasons for this
request and supporting evidence is as follows.
Jls amns5ty program for second units excludes my property at 1226-1228 Paloma
and therefore under that program will remain as a nonconforming use. It is not fair or
proper that properties which have been hidden from the City will be sanctioned as
"conforming" while my units which are well known to the City.- are documented as
having separate addresses at boththe City and the County Registrar would remain "non
conformingl'.
Tlnte 1224 Palomaproperty adjoins an R-3 lot which adjoins the Broadway
Commercial Area. It makes sense to both myself and to the Owner of 1224 Paloma to
make the obvious change to an R-2 designation since both properties are close to
transportation corridors @l Camino & California Drive) as well as public tansportation
(Cal-Train and Sam-Trans). Employment opportunities exist on Broadway and some of
its side stneets and are within walking distance.
As far back as anyone can remember the property located at 122G1228 Paloma
has been a duplex. The floor plan of both units appear to be original, in that no floor plan
changes were made to convert a single family residenee into a duplex.
Carl DeQuant who lives next door to me grcw up inthe house he currently lives in
and stated thrtlz}f.lZ2SPalsmawas always a duplex.
I purchased the building in the early 80's from Jack Linville, who was bom and
raised in Burlingame, He stated that he bought the property in the early 50's and that it
was a duplex at tlrat time and to his knowledge had always been a duplex.
We ask your consideration of this request and hope that you find it in the best
interest of the City of Burlingama
yotL
RECEIVEDR ECEIVED
AUG 1 0 2001Deal
t' ll
^t^i-?^y8'J
I 3f " t''rt, l,[*1N3'Jt3+yt
sEP 2 7 Z00r
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Date:
To: City of Burlingame
Planning Deparfinent
Burlingame, CA 94010 ..
Re Rezoning of area from R-l to R-2 designation.
Print name Sigrr name
I the undersigned, being the owner of the property as noted below, give my
support.to changing the following properties from an R_l to an R_2
designation. I aurhorize Jerry Deal to speak.on my behalf at all meetings. I
understand that I may attend any public meeting regarding this issue ani
that I may have-input at those meetings regardless of this document.
Address
AQfr
dt3 -l.utt_L la^/kV)/>e 1225 Paloma
1224Paloma
1228 Paloma
1229 Paloma
1225Lagtna
llrcsblAs :AI&NS
\ 11on-(
l229Lagvna '
1224 Capuchino
Dr"L
4Al,T
ETVqL 1228 Capuchino
RECEIVED
Sincerely,
To:Planning Commission
City of Bwlingame
Jerry Deal
1226- 1228 Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: l2ZlPalomaAvenue
I approached the owner of this property a couple of months ago regarding rezoning to R-2
md h,e had no reservations in srpporting this e,ndeavor. The property is currently rented
out and the Owner lives in Hillsborough. The home has been in the family for many
}saxs. I do not have his home phone number but have call"rl his office. As of yet I bave
not gotten a rcply to signing the papen*'ork. Therefore for the purposes ofthis action I
have his verbal OIC
yoll
Deal
RECEIVED
ocT 1 5 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT
To:Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
Jerry Deal
1226- 1228 Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 1225 Lagwa
This is an existing aparhent building which according to the Planning Departuent is
built on an R-l lot. Bwause of this I and the Oumer's represeirtative of the property
would hope that this parcel could be rezoned to R-3.
you,
RECEIVED
ocT L 5 2oo1
t''.t,
f,[*?,Y8'JU 3 +
- t
Date
To: City of Burlingame
Planning Department
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: Rezoning of area from R-l to R-2 designation.
I the undersigrred, being the owner of the property as noted below, give my
support to changing the following properties from an R-l to an R-2
designation. I authorze Jerry Deal to speak on my behalf at all meetings. I
understand that I may attend any public meeting regarding this issue and
that I may have input at those meetings regardless of this document.
Sincerely,
Print name Sign name Address
1225 Lagvna
6^rf*,+
€22.J
*-^ZL- 7 / )>f'442z..,-*_2",-<_-
,"V",,- /7>S'Z/z-. ?5 R-3
RECEIVED
ocT 15 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAMF
PLANNING DEPT
CITY OF'BURIINGAME
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
File No. ND-516-P. 1224-1229 Paloma: 1225 & 1229 Laqtna: and l?24 & 1228 Capuchino Avemes
The City of Burlingame by Marsaret Monroe on October 12 .2001, completed a review of the
proposed project and determined that:
(XX) It will not have a significant effect on the environment
(XX) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Project Description: The applicant is requesting that eight properties located on Lagun4 Paloma and
Capuchino Avenue be rezoned from the R-l zone dishict to the R-2 zone district. In order to accomplish
that rezoning, the general plan land use designation must also be changed from the low density reside,ntial
to the medium-low density residential designation. The project area consists of eight parcels. Six of these
parcels are now developed with single family homes. There is a duplex on the parcel at 1226- 1228
Paloma Avenue which would become a conforming use if the zoning designation is approved. There is
a nonconforming 4-unit apartment building at 1225 Laguna Avenue which would continue to be
nonconforming. There is no development proposed as a part of this application, but the change in zoning
would allow for the addition of six dwelling units to this area.
Reasons for Conclusion: The project consists of a general plan amendment and rezoning of eight parcels
from the R-l zone district to the R-2 zone district. Six of the parcels are now developed with single family
homes, one with a duplex and one with a four-unit apartment building. The rezoning will allow the
existing duplex to become a legal use. In addition, up to six additional units could be built by adding one
unit to each of the six lots with single family homes. The additioir r,f six new housing units to this area
is not expected to have a significant impact on the environment. Referring to the initial study for all other
facts supporting findings, it is found that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
zcb \
Signature of Processing Official Title Date Signed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final.
Date oosted: to/te/Ot
Negative Declaration
Page 2
I 2 2 6- I 2 2 8 Paloma Avenue
Declaration of Posting
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a kue
copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council
Chambers.
Executed at Burlingame, California on October 12. 2001 .
Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No
\
CITY CLERK, CITY OF BURLINGAME
1. Project Title:General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for property located at 1224 through
1229 Paloma Avenue, 1225 & 1229 Lagwra Avenue and 1224 & 1228
Capuchino Avenue
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:Margaret Monroe, City Planner
(6so) ss8-72s0
4 Project Location:Parcels with the following addresses in Burlingame, California:
1224, 1225, 122:6-1228, and 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 and 1229 Lagwra Avenue
1224 and 1228 Capuchino Avenue
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:Jerry Deal
1226 -1228 P aloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
6. General Plan Designation:Low Density Residential
7. Zoningz R-l APNs:026-095-080, -090, 230 &240;
026-094-080, -090, -200 & -2t0
Description of the Project: The applicant is requesting that eight properties located on Laguna,
Paloma and Capuchino Ave,nue be rezoned from the R-l zone district to the R-2 zone district. In order
to accomplish that rezoring,the general plan land use designation must also be changed from the low
density residential to f"'e "nedium-low density residential designation. The project area consists of
eight parcels. Six of these parcels are now developed with single family homes. There is a duplex
on the parcel at 1226- l22SPaloma Avenue which would become a conforming use if the zoning
designation is approved. There is a nonconforming 4-unit aparffirent building at 1225 Laguna Ave,nue
which would continue to be nonconforming. There is no development proposed as a part of this
application, but the change in zoning would allow for the addition of six dwelling units to this area.
Surrounding Land uses and Setting: The area is bordered on the east, north and west by single
family homes, and on the south by apartment buildings zoned R-3. Broadway, a downtown
commercial street zoned C-1, is located less than Y+mile south of the area. This is a transition area
between multiple family and single family uses.
City of BurlingamE,
501 Primrose Road;
Planning Departrnent
Burlingame, CA 94010
8
9
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: None.
IMTIAL STUDY SUMMARY . ET.IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
.- -. .. -:':. - - . .:.".t4.-!.;.,-;:
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially aflected by this project, involving at least one
that is a "Potentially Significant as indicated the checklist on the following pages.
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency).
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
x Land Use and Planning Biological Resources Aesthetics
Population and Housing Mineral Resources Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Recreation
\'& WaterHydrology
Quality
Noise Agricultural Resources
Air Quality Public Services Mandatory Findings of
Significance
TransportatiorlTraffic and Serviceutilities
Systems
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmen! and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.x
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmen! there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATM DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a Apotentially significant impact or a potentially significant
unless mitigated impact on the cnvironment, but at least one effect (l) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document purSirant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required but it must aralyz* only the effects that remain to be ad&essed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the el' iicnment, because all
potentially significant effects (1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, and (2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
projecq nothing further is required-
V\fi7ffi&+\ilrrNz-a Z.rst
Margare{ Molroe, city rtanner
.l
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicant
Issues
Potcntially
Signiticant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Wouldthe project:
a) Physically divide an established community?1,2,3 x
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
1,2,3 x
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
l,l2 x
2. POPITLATION AI\D HOUSING. Would the project:
1,3,4 x
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?1,2,3 x
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?1,2,3 x
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Wouldtheproject:
a) Expose people or sEuctures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
5,6,7 x
i) Ruphre of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for the area orbased on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
5,6,7'x
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?5,6,7 x
5,6,7
iv) Landslides?5,6,'7 x
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil?1,5 x
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially
result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
1,6,7 x
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-l-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life
or property?
1,5,6 x
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
I x
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?I x
a) Induce in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Seismic-related ground failure; including liquefaction?
-3-
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
1,15 x
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration ofthe course ofa stream or
river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?1,8 x
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration ofthe course ofa stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
1,8 x
e) Create or contribute runoffwater which would exceed the
capacity of existing or plarmed stornwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
1,8 x
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?118 x
g) Place housing within a l0Gyear flood hazard area as mapped on
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map
or other flood hazard delineation map?
8 x
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
8 x
i) Expose people or structures to a significantrisk ofloss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
1,8 x
1,5 x
5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution
contol dishict may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?1,9 x
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation?1,9 x
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air Anlity standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors)?
1,9 x
d) Expose sensitive receptors to zubstantial pollutant
concentrations?
1,9 x
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
l19 x
-4-
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would theproject:
a) Cause an increase in taffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing haflic load and capacity of the sheet system (i.e., result
in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle kips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
I x
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?1,11 x
c) Result in a change in aA traffic pattems, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
l,l0 x
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp
curyes or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g',
farm equipment)?
I x
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?I x
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?I x
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
altemative tansportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
1,1 I x
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOITRCES. Would the project:
a) Have a adverse effecf either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Departrnent of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?l,l2 x
b) Have a substantial or adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the California Departrnent of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
I,l2 x
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlauds
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological intemrption, or other means?
l,l2 x
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native or
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
7,12 x
e) Conllict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
I x
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Cooservation
Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
I x
-5-
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less then
Signilicent
Impact
No
Impact
8. MINERALRESOT]RCES.Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
1,5 x
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
1,5 x
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERHLS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazardto the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal ofhazardous
materials?1,13 x
b) Create a significant hazardto the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
I 13 x
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste wi0tin one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
I t3 x
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
t3 x
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
1,10 x
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
I x
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?I x
h) Expose people or skuctures to a significantrisk ofloss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
I x
10. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposurc ofpersons to or generation ofnoise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards ofother agencies?
1 x
b) Exposure ofpersons to or generation ofexcessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
1 x
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
I x
-6-
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigetion
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
1,10 x
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
l0 x
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
I x
11. PI]BLIC SERVICES. Would the proje '+ ilr:sult in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemment facilities, the conskuction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other perfornance
objectives for any ofthe public services:
a) Fire protection?I x
b) Police protection?I x
c) Schools?I x
d) Parks?I x
e) Other public facilities?I x
12. {ITILITIES AI\D SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater teatnent requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
1 x
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
I x
c) Require or result in the constuction of n. * storm water
drainage facilities or expansion ofexisting facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
I x
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or eipanded
entitlements needed?
1 x
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater teatnent provider
which serves or rnay serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to
the provide/s existing commitrrents?
1 x
f) Be served by a landfill witfi suffrcient pernritted capacity to
accourmodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
1 x
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
1 x
-7-
\'
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Lcss then
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?I x
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
I x
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings?
I x
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
I x
14. CULTURAL RESO[IRCES. Would the project:
a) Create a subltantial adverse charge in the significance ofa
historical resource as defined in'15064.5?
I x
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to' I 5064. 5 ?
I x
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geological feature?
I x
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?I x
15. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
I x
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
I x
16. AGRICULTTiRAL RESOIiRCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
Califomia Departrnent of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farrrland, Unique Farrnland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Fannland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agencn to non-agricultural
use?
I x
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
I x
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Famrland,
to non-agricultural use?
I x
-8-
.,,..... -..-:.-;';i1,. ..
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less then
Signilicent
Impact
No
Impact
17. MANDATORY F'INDINGS OF SIGMFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
cornmunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?I x
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that
..t e incremental effects of a project ae considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects ofprobable future projects)?
I x
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?I x
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
l2
13
18. SOTTRCE
City
City of Burling ame, Municip al
1990 & 2000 Cenzus
Department of the Interior, U.S.
E. Brabb, E. Pampeyan, and
t972.
Bonilla, Landslide
Perkins, Jeanne, Maps Showing Cumulative Damage
Mateo County; California, 1987.
Map of Approximate Locatians
Maps, September 16, l98l
BAASMD CESA GUIDELINES,
Mateo
Snte of Hazardous Waste and
P I an, Bvrlingame, California, I 1984 amendments.
- Tnning, Burlingame, Califoraia, I
Housing Element, City of Burlingame,California,
Suwey, San Francisco Bay Region,3, l:125,000,I
in San Mateo County,Mateo County, Califomia,
Earthquake Ground U.S.G.S. Map MF, San
Areas, from the National Insurance Program Flood
Air Quality Impacts of Projects , December, 1995
airport Land Use Plan,San International Arrport,t994
San Francisco and San Mateo C oun ti es, Cal ifo rnt a, Starte
San Mateo County Congestion Management Program, 1997
Map of Areas of Special
Fish and Gami
Sit* List,April 1998
-9-
Initial Sndy Summary I 2 2 6- I 2 2 I Paloma Avenue
Land Use and Planning Summary: The project area is designated in the General Plan as low density
residential and is zonedR-l. The request is to change the land use designation from low density residential
to medium density residential and to rezorre the area from R-l to R-2. The low density residential land use
designation provides for single family residential uses at densities ofup to 8 units per acre. Most ofthe single
family residential subdivision in the flat areas of Burlingame are developed at densities of between 5 and 7
units per acre. The medium density residential land use designation, w[ich allows development at between
9 and 20 units per acre, is meant to be occupied by duplexes and onb and two story garden apartment
developments. The R-l district allows development of one house per parcel. The R-2 zone district allows
development of two units on each lot, the lower end of the medium density residential land use designation.
The project area consists of 8 parcels, each 50 feet wide by 120 feet deep. Six of the parcels are now
developed with single family homes. The site at 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue contains a duplex, and there is
one four-unit aparhnent at 1225 Laguna Avenue. The duplex appears to have been built around 1940, before
tlre R-l zone district was established. i:l L964, ause variance was granted for the constuction ofthe four-unit
apartrnent building at 1225 Laguna Avenue. Both of these uses are now considered nonconformirrg in ttre R-1
zone district. Use variances, to allow exceptions for uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses in a zoning
district, have not been legal since the 1970's.
With the rezoning of the area from R-l to R-2, the nonconforming duplex would become a legal use. The
four-unit apartment building would retain its nonconforming status. This means that the use may remain on
the site, but if the building were destroyed, any new structure would have to comply with the zoringin place
at that time. The R-2 zone would allow construction of a duplex to replace the four-unit structure.
Maintenance and repairs to the structure would be limited to fifty percent of the value of the structure, and
the structure could not be expanded.
Altlrough no development is proposed at this time, rezoning these parcels from R-l to R-2 zoning could result
in the addition of up to 6 residential units in the project area (assuming each of the parcels with single family
houses were converted to duplex use). This could result in a change to the character of the neighborhood over
time. This change in use would also act as a transition area between the surrounding single family houses and
the more intense multiple family and commercial uses along the Broadway corridor.
The Conselation Element of the Burlingame General Plan identifies this neighborhood north of Broadway
between El Camino Real and Califomia Drive as a "Stable Urban Area". The Conservation Element describes
this area as an area primarily devoted to single family residence an notes that the quality is good and the area
should remain stable. It recommends that a transition to aparhnent development in the southern portion of
the area should be considered.
Population and Housing Summary: This site and the surrounding area are planned for low density
residential uses. The change in land use designation and zoning could result in the addition of six housing
units to Burlingame's housing stock. As required by State law, the City is in the process of amending the
Housing Element of the Burlingame General Plan. The State, in association with the Association of Bay Area
Governments, has determined that due to projected population growth the City of Burlingame needs to
provide opportunities for an additional 565 housing units within its boundaries. The change in General Plan
land use designation and rezoning of this area to the R-2 zone dishict would contribute to the accomplishment
of that goal.
-10-
Inilial Study Summary I 226-1 228 Paloma Avenue
Geologic Summary: The site is flat and located in an urban setting which has been developed with
residential uses for about 60 to 80 years. The area is approximately 2 miles from the San Andreas Fault but
is not within the Alquist-Priola zone; the site is within one and one-fourth miles of the Serra Fault, a minor
thrust fault considered to have common roots with the San Andreas Fault. There are no known faults on the
site. Since no changes are being made to the structures in the projectrSrea, the seismic exposure will not
change. The site is relatively level and does not have a history of landsliding. Four broad soil groups exist
in Burlingame. This site is designated as an alluvium plain which consists primarily of gravel, sand, silt and
clay deposits. Under seismic conditions, most Burlingame soils are reasonably stable. This site is in an area
of very low (0 -0.2% probability) liquefaction susceptibility.
Water Summary: This site is not located near or adjacent to open waterways. The project site is located
in Flood ZoneB, which is outside the 100-year flood zone. There are existing 4" water mains in Laguna,
Paloma and Capuchino Avenues which provide water service to these sites. Ttiere is existing capacity in the
system to accommodate the future development of up to six units in this area.
Air Quatity Summary: No objectionable odors or alteration in air movement, moisfure, temperafure or
change in local or regional climate is anticipated to occur as a result of this proposal. The change in emissions
generated by traffic to and from any future development as compared to all development in Burlingame is
insignificant. The sites are also within easy walking distance of the Caltrain station at Broadway and major
bus routes which run along El Camino Real.
Transportation/Circulation Summary: The potential increase in the number of dwelling units will not
result in a significant increase in haffic in the area. Any new units built would have to meet the on site
parking requirements of the Burlingame zoning ordinance.
Biological Resources Summary: This site and the surrounding areahave been developed with residential
uses for 60 to 80 years. There are no native plants or habitats on the site. There is no record of any rare,
unique or endangered species of plants or animals in the project area. Therc isno farmland in Burlingame.
Energy and Mineral Resources Summary: There is no construction proposed as a part of this project. If
additional units are built, substantial amounts of fuel witl not be needed to construct, develop or maintain the
project.
Hazards Summary: Since no construction is proposed at this time, this project is not expected to expose
people to health hazards, nor is it expected to create a health haz,ard. Future conskuction will be required to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which will ensure that people in any new structures will not be
exposed to health hazards or potential health hazards.
Noise Summary: The site and the surrounding area has been developed for many years with residential uses,
and the project will not result in an increase in the existing arnbient noise levels.' Future constnrction activities
may increase noise levels during constnrction. The municipal code limits conskuction hours to 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on
Sundays.
-1 1-
Initial Study Summary 1 226- I 228 Paloma Avenue
Public Services Summary: The potential increase in the number of dwelling units on these sites is not
expected to have a significant impact on the provision of public services, as this is an urbanized area with
existing public facilities in place.
Utilities and Service Systems Summary: The proposed project will be served by existing utilities in place
in the area. There are existing sewer lines which run along the rear pron.erty lines of these properties which
connect to a 21" sewer main in Juanita and California Drive and ultitnately connects to the wastewater
treatnent facility. There is adequate capacity in these lines and at the wastewater treatnent facility to provide
service to the potential six units which could be built if the area were rezoned. Storm water frorn these sites
surface drains along the streets to a box culvert which runs parallel to Lincoln Avenue and connects to the
Easton Creek Channel which drains to the Bay. There are existing water lines in Laguna, Paloma and
Capuchino Avenues which provide water service to these sites.
Aesthetics Summary: Since no change is proposed to the existing sfructures, there will be no impact to the
aesthetics of the area. New construction would have to comply with *re zoning ordinance requirements for
building height, floor area and lot coverage. This R-l zoned area, which is now subject to design review
would, if zoned R-2, be exempt from that requirement.
Cultural Resources Summary: There are no known prehistoric or historic archeological sites in this area.
If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during any future construction, all work will
be required to be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as
determined by quali{ied experts, can be implemented.
Recreation Summary: The proposed project does not replace or destroy any existing or planned recreational
facilities. There are existing recreational facilities available to serve existing and future residents ofthis area.
U :WISTUDYI I 2 2 6 Paloma Initial Study.doc
-12-
lacts wnich iustity such action are as lollows:
1. The Recorder is a newspaper which be-
gan publishing in 1 887 as the San Francisco
[aw Journal. li publishes live times a week,
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
2. The Recorder was adjudicated as a
hewspaper ol general circulalion in the City
and County of San Francisco on October 1 1,
1 905 by San Francisco Superior Court Judge
William P. Lawlor. Becords of that adiudica-
tion were apparently deskoyed in the 1 906
earthquake, and The Becorder was re-
established as a newspaper ol general circula
tion on December 3, 1 907, by order ol Judge
Lawlor.
3. On Monday, August 14,20@, The Re-
corder began printing at San Francisco Otlset
Printing Company, located at 3508 Haven
Avenue, Redwood City, CA 94063 in San Ma-
teo County. The Recorder has been printed
at that location continuously since that time,
and has been issued ,rom the place where it
is printed and sold to or circulated among
subscribers in San Mateo County during the
whole o{ the one-year-plus period commenc-
ing Augusl 1 4, 2000.-4. The Recorder is a newspaper published
for the dissemination ol local and national
news ol a general character, pursuant to Gov-
ernment Code section 6000. lt has a bona
lide subscription list of paying subscribers. h
has been established, printed and published
at regular intervals (Monday through Friday ot
eactrweek, holidays excepted) in San Mateo
Counly lor more than one year pursuant to
Govarnment Code seclions 6000,6003, 6004
and 6005.'WHEREFORE, The Recorder prays as
iollows:
- . l. For a judicial decree pursuant to Govern
Jnent Code seclions 6020 and 6027 establish-
ing,The Becorder as a newspaper of gerieral
cirorlation in San Mateo County pursuant to
Govemment Code section 6000; and
.... - 2. For such other and further reliel as the
Court may deem just and proper.. ,Dated: October 17,2001.-LEVY, RAM, OLSON & ROSSI
' . By: Karl Olson
Attornevs lor Petilioner The Recorder. VERIFIdATION-
ICode ol Civil Proceduie section,146). 'l, Christopher Braun, am the publisher ol
The Recorder. I have read the loregoing Peti-
tion to have The Recorder established as a
'nelvspaper of general circulation in san Ma-
teo County. Ths same is true ol my own
knowledge, except as to matters therein stat-
od on intormation and belief, and as to those
matters I believe them to bo true.
I declare under penatty of perjury thal the
foraooino is true and corect.
dxecfied in San Francisco, Califomia, on
October 8, 2001.
Christopher Braun
tior,
general tn
auant to Government
as
San Mateo County
November 1,2;' 9,10,12,
will sell at auc-
the LOCK lT UP located at
PUBLIb SALE
the Calitornia Selt-Storage Act
Prole$ional Cods 21700et.
D-143 Sean
J-223
San Mateo County
November
Times, #18752
2,2OO1
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
F|LE NO. i82411
Ths following person is doing business as:
FBENANDO VERBOONEN,
LOCATED AT: 926 B S. Claremont St.
lN: San Mateo, CA 94402
IS HEBEBY REGISTEBED BYTHE
FOLLOWING OWNER:
Femando Verboonen, 21 89 Park Arroyo
Place, Hayward, CA 94545
This business is conducted by:
an lndividual
FERNANDO VERBOONEN
THIS STATEMENT WAS FILED WITH
WAREN SLOCUM, ASSESSOB-COUNTY
CLEBK.BECORDEB,SAN MATEO
couNTY oN ocrober 5,2001
San Mateo County Times, #89oil
October 12, 19, ,6; 'lovembeJ 2,2041
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
F|LE NO. 182374
The lollowing persons are doing business
as:
GRAND LEADER MARKET,600 San
Mateo Ave., San Bruno, CA 94066.
Metrock Nushwat,9 Corte Ana, Millbrae,
cA 94030.
Marvin Nushwat, I Corte Aha, Millbrae, CA
94030.
This business is conducted by:
an lndividaul.
THIS STATEMENT WAS FILED WITH
VI'ABREN SLOCUM, ASSESSOR.COUNTY
CLERK-FECORDEB, SAN MATEO COUN.
TY ON October 3, 2001.
San Maleo County Times, #18482
November 2, 9, 1 6, 23, 2001
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
STATEMENT
NO. 18236s
The following person(s) are doing busi-
ness as:
DONGSES ENTERPRTSES, 1401.
Southgate Avenue, Daly City, CA 9a015.
Violet M. Dongs€s, 1401 Southgate Ave-
nue, Daly City, CA94015.
This business is r-4'rcled by: an
lndMdual.
The registrant commenced to transact
business under the fictitious business
name or names listed above on NOT
APPUOABLE.
VIOLET M. DONGSES
. THIS STATEMENTWAS FILEDWTH
WARREN SLOCUM, ASSESSOF.COUNfi
CLERK-RECORDER OF SAN MATEO
couNTY oN ocToBEH 03, 2001.
San Mateo Cowrty #.11363
October
bed in this notice, or in written correspond-
ence delivered to the City Council at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILIIES ACT
ln compliance wilh the Americans with Dis-
abilities Acl, those requiring accommodation
lor this meeting should notily the Planning De
partment 24 hours prior to the meeting at
(650\ 522 -7 202, r DD (650) 522-7 047 .
(ctlAuluNJUul(aALr' -' - |
CASE NO. {Numero del Caso):. sc029tt45
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (Aviso a
Acusado) NAME: ALAMO FINANCING, LP;
BAO CHEN;.
Does 1 through 20 inclusive
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(A Ud. le esta demandando.). CARBIE ROSS
You have 30 CALENDAB DAYS after this
summons is served on you to file a
typeruritten response at this court.
A letter or phone call will not protect you:
your typewritten response must be in proper
legal form il you want the court to hear your
case..
ll you do not iile your Response on time,
you may lose the case, and your wages,
money and property may be taken without fur
ther waming lrom the court.
There are other legal requirements. You
rnay want to call an attorney right away. ll
you do not know an attomey, you rnay call an
attorney rererral seruice or a legal aid otfice
(listed in the phone book).
Despues de que le engreguen esta
citacion iudicial usted tiene un plazo de 30
DIAS CALENDABIOS para presentar una
respuesta escrita a maquina en esta corte.
Una carta o una llamada telelonica no le
ofrecera proteccioni su respuesta escrila a
maquina liene que cumplir con las
lormalidades legales apropladas si usted
quiere que la corte escuche su caso
Si usted no presenta su respuesta a
tiempo, puede perder el caso, y le pueden
quitar su salario, su dinero y otras cosasde
su propiedad sin aviso adicional por parte de
la corte.
Existen otros requisitos legals. Puede que
usted quiera llamar a un abogado
inmediatamente. Si no conocde a un
abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de
relerencia de abogados ao a una oticina d6
ayuda legal (vea el directorio telelonico).
The name and address of the court is: (El
nombre y direccion de la corte es); SUPERI-
OR COUT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OFVENTURA,3s5SI
ALAMO STREET, SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063I
EAST COUNTY DIVISION.
The name, address, and telephone num-
ber of petitioner's attorney, or petitioner with-
out an aftorney is: ( El nombre, la direccion y
el numero de telefono del abogado del
demandante, o del demandante que no tiene
abogado, es);
Andrew L Shapiro,
LEWTT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO,
MABSHALL & HARLAN
16633 Venlura Blvd., 1 lth Flool
Encino, CA 91436
(818) 9814764
Date: (Fecha) May 01, 2OOl
By DEPUfi'S NAME, TRACYS. JOURNET
Deputy (Delegado)
San Mateo County Times, #11724
October 19,26; November 2, 9, 2qrl
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS
NAME STATEMENT
FILE NO. 181983
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ARE ,
DOING EUSINESS AS:
SCREEN FILM USA
LOCATEDAT: 501 Ahport Blvd.
lN: South San Francisco, 94080
IS (ARE) HEREBY REGISTERED BY THE'FOLLOWING OWNER(S):
Mr. Anuro Gonzalez
501 AirponBtud. S. San Francisco,
94080.
NAME
FILE
Tim$, #18041
3,5,6, 7,8,
2q)1
lollowing persons:
SPACES:
Mr. Pedro Caceres
taurie Meadows DE #127, San
Landlord reserues
Oancellation in the errent ol
at the
393
Mateo, CA
This
944ff!.
businss
business
is conducted by: a Go
commenced to lransact
SAN MATEO
2001
or names
lween ownor and obligated party.
Auction conducled-pursdant io Sedion
2328 ol the Commercial Code and 535 ol the
Public Code.
DIVIDEND CAPITAL GROUP.
Telephone 408/4lB-555O
A,/A Bond: REDl006896
' San Mateo County Tl6es; #18381!' November 2,9, 2(x)1
San Mateo County Tlmos, #8202
October 12, 19,26;
November 2,.2(xr1
,t ,i-
san Mateo county nm€s; #18250
November 2, axll
Califomia.
wiI anon
lrom
atto
2N
1224-1228
zoned
nor rflfi in .iny ircrease iri rneldci'eii-ria-rii;]i'tirii=o
th€ @utrence ol the base flood disharge and that "
all nil @nstrudion and substiltial imDrwement
shall comply with appli€ble ll@d haard reductiq
provisiore.
Variarce Pr@edure
Nature of Variances - notation ol physical
characlerisli6
Appeal Board - specifietioGlor crcideration ol ap-provalof variancei rctificalion of iEeased premium
ral6 for flood insurane and ircreased risks to lile
and property; mdntemrc ot varian@ records.
Conditions tor VariarcE - smfication ol size ol oroo.
erty; repair ot 'historic struc(ures,' posibilily ol in:
crease in fl@d lwels; determinatron of 'minimum
n&essary,' findings to b€ made: cmduct of funclion-
ally dependent use, and csditiN of approval.
This ordinarce ffi introduced d the Town Council
Melinq of oclober 9, 2001. ard adoDted al the Meet-
ing ol Oclober 23, 200'1. by the lolloviing vote:
AYES: Courcilmmbs Boynton, Goeld,
Putnam. Tanns. Mavry HodGNOES: Nbm'ABSENT: C@rcill]lffiberSirclairABSTAIN: Nons
Janet G. Koel$h
Clert ot lhe Town of Woodside
San Maleo Counly Tim6, #19062
Novembei 2. 2001
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF ANNUAL FLUSHING. OF WATER MAINS
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEUI the City
ol Burlingame Water Division intends to
start their annual flushing ol water
mains within the City of Burlingame be
ginning on Monday, OCTOBER 29,20Ol
This program takes about eight weeks to
complete.
On Oclober 29, the water crew will be
gin flushing the Southern end of the
city limits along Peninsula and
Baniolhet Avenues. They will proceed
North betvveen the Hillsborough town lim
its and Highway 101 and Broadway. Then
they will ,iush the hydrants on Skyline,
Skyview, and Loma Vista area between
Hillsborough town limits and Margarita
Avenue.
Simultaneously, on October 29th anoth
er Water Division crew will begin flush -
ing hydrants in the Mills Estate area
and proceed East towards Highway 1 01 and
South towards Broadway. Then the
Burlingame Hills unincorporated area
will be flushed. The lndustrial Area
East of Highway 101 between the Millbrae
and San Mateo city limits will be the
last area flushed.
The Burlingame Avenue and Broadway
Business Districts and their adjacenl
blocks will be flushed at nighl between
the hours or 10:00 pm and 3:00 am to
avoid interruptions to business and traf
fic.
The benefrt ol flushing the water
mains is that it improves the water qual
ity by removing the silt and sediment
that build up in tho walsr lines. This
'build uC causes th€ depletion of chlor
ine that is needed to provide you with
sale, clean waler. ln addition, the
flushing assures that th€ fire hydrants
and vyater mains are functioning propedy
and-efticientty.
l, possiblo, please avoid these areas
when ffushing is in procoss. ll you
must tavel iri'these areas, proieed with
caulion.
Flushing ol each hydrant will cause
temporary discoloration ot the water,
which could last as bng as one day.
However, during this time the water will
not b6 contaminated and b still safe
fordomesticuse. Pleas€checklordis -
coloration belore washing any clothes.
I would be advisabla to postpone any
laundry use untilthe water becomes
clear.
For further inlormation, contact Rav
Vanover at (650) 558.7670 between 7AM
and 3:30 PM, weekdays.
The San Maleo County Times, #14201. October 26,27;
November 2, 3, 9, 10, 16, 17,23,24,
30; Decambor 1,7, a, 14, 15, 2001 .:I
'\1
l
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BUBLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
L224-L228.1L225-L229 PAr.o!{A A\rEMrE, L225-
1229 lAGtl{A A\rEMrE, AIID L22l'L225
CAPUCHINO A\TEM'E
Application for qeneral plan amendment from
low density residential to medium density
residentj-aI and rezoning from R-L (Single
family Dwellings) to R-2 (Duplex Dnellings) at
t224-1228 / L225-!229 Paloma Avenue, t225-t229
Lagrrna Avenue, arrd L224-7228 Capuchino Avenue,
zoned n-L. (APNs: 026-094-080,090, 2OO,ZtO;026-
095-080, 090,230,2401
The City of Burlingame Planrrj-ng Commission
announces the following ptrblic hearing on
I\resd.av, November 13, 2001 at 7:00 P'M' in the
ffiaII counail chambers located at 501
primrose Road, Burlingtame, California'
Mailed Ngvembe-r 2,. .2OOt(Please refer to other sfie)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-72s0.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
be reviewed prior
Primrsse Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
CALrro il f A
(Please refer to other side)
_l
I
'described
RBSOLUTION APPROYING NEGATTVE DECLARATION,
GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT AND REZOMNG
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a negative declaration has been proposed and application has been made for a
lan amendment residential to medium densi
rezoninq from R-l to R-2 at 1224. 1226-1228 alosl.e Avpnup- 1225 & 1229 Paloma Avenue.
122s & 122 A 224 & 1228 Avenue
Belinda &Teresa
Elenore Albert
-09O. -23O & -240:02 -090- -2 00 & -210
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Plenning Commission of the City of
Burlingame on November 13. 2001 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report
and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments receivd and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no
substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the
environment, and negative declaration, per Negative Declaration No. 516-P is hereby approved.
2. It is recommended that the Council of the City of Burlingame approve said general
plan amendment from low density residential to medium density residential and rezoning from R-l
irlR-2. Findings for such general plan amendment and rezoning are as set forth in the minutes
and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the
official records of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning
Commission that:
Pl onning Commiss io\ Resolution
Negalive Declaration, Rezoaing and Plan Amendment
122G1228 Paloma Avenue
I, Joseph Boju6s , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certiry that tie foregoing resolutiotr was inroduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November , 2001 , by the following vote:
AYES:COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
2
CITY OF BURLINGAME
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
File No. ND-516-P. 1224-1229 Paloma: 1225 & 1229 Laguna: and 1?24 & 1228 Caouchino Avenues
The City of Burlingame by Monroe on October 12 -2001, completed a review of the
proposed project and determined that:
(XX) It will not have a significant effect on the environment
(XX) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Project Description: The applicant is requesting that eight properties located on Laguna, Paloma and
Capuchino Avenue be rezoned from the R-L zone dishict to the k-2 znne district. In order to accomplish
that rezoning, the general plan land use designation must also be changed from the low density residential
to the medium-low density residential designation. The project area consists of eight parcels. Six of these
parcels are now developed with single family homes. There is a duplex on the parcel at 1226- 1228
Paloma Avenue which would become a conforming use if the zoning designation is approved. There is
a nonconforming 4-unit aparhnent building at 1225 Laguna Avenue which would continue to be
nonconforming. There is no development proposed as a part of this application, but the change in zoning
would allow for the addition of six dwelling units to this area.
Reasons for Conclusion: The project consists of a general plan amendment and rezoning of eight parcels
from the R-l zone district to the P.-2 zone district. Six of the parcels are now developed with single family
homes, one with a duplex and one with a four-unit apartment building. The rezoning will allow the
existing duplex to become a legal use. In addition, up to six additional units could be built by adding one
ur,lt tti each of the six lots with single family homes. The addition of six new housing units to this area
is not expected to have a significant impact on the environment. Referring to the initial study for all other
facts supporting findings, it is found that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
2.?a\
Signature of Processing Offrcial Title Date Signed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final.
Date oosted: to/te/Ot
tl
w
Negative Declaration
Page 2
1 226- I 228 Paloma Avenue
Declaration of Posting
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true
copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council
Chambers.
Executed at Burlingame, Califomia on October 12. 2001 .
Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No
MUSSO, CITY CLERK, CITY OF BURLINGAME
RECTruED
I}I THE OFFICT OF
OcT 1 5 200'!
CLE[i;i iii IHI
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Project Title:
INITIAL STUDY SUMMARY . EI\TYIROIIMENTAL CHECKLIST
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for property located at 1224 through
1229 Paloma Avenue, 1225 & 1229 Laguna Avenue and 1224 & 1228
Capuchino Avenue
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:Margaret Monroe, City Planner
(6s0) ss8-72s0
4.Project Location:Parcels with the following addresses in Burlingame, California:
1224,1225,122,6-1228, and 1229 Paloma Avenue
1225 and 1229 Laguna Avenue
1224 andl228 Capuchino Avenue
Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Jerry Deal
1226 -1228 Paloma Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
6. General Plan Designation:Low Density Residential
7. Zoningz R-l APNs: 026-095-080, -090, 230 & 240;
026-094-080, -090, -2A0 & -210
Description of the Project: The applicant is requesting that eight properties located on Laguna,
Paloma and Capuchino Ave,nue be rezoned from the R-l zone district to the R-2 zone distict. Irr order
to accomplish that rezoning, the general plan land use designation must also be changed from the low
density residential to the medium-low density residential designation. The project area consists of
eight parcels. Six of these parcels are now developed with single family homes. There is a duplex
on the parcel at 1226- l22SPaloma Avenue which would become a conforming use if the z.ontng
designation is approved. There is a nonconforming 4-unit apartrnent building at 1225 Laguna Avenue
which would continue to be nonconforming. There is no development proposed as a part of this
application, but the change in zoning would allow for the addition of six dwelling units to this area.
Surrounding Land uses and Setting: The area is bordered on the east, north and west by single
family homes, and on the south by apartrnent buildings zoned R-3. Broadway, a downtown
commercial skeet zoned C-1, is located less than %mile south of the area. This is a transition area
between multiple family and single family uses.
City of Burlingamg,
501 Primrose Road;
Planning Department
Burlingame, CA 94010
5
8.
9
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: None.
EI\-VIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED :
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated the checklist on the following pages.
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Biological Resources AestheticsxLaud Use and Planning
Population and Housing Mineral Resources Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Recreation
\'& WaterHydrology
Qualiry
Noise Agricultural Resources
Air Quality Public Services Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service
Systems
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a siguificant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.x
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATM DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a signifrcant effect on the environmeng and an
ElnrtROM\dENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a Apotentially significant impact or a potentially significant
unless mitigated impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation
mea$lres based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find thatralthough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (l) have been aoalyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATME
DECLARATION, and (2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
project, nsthing further is required-
t2 Ztsr
-2-
date
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less then
Significent
Impact
No
Impact
1. LAIYD USE AND PLANNING. \Vould the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?1,2,3 x
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
1,2,3 x
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
l,l2 x
2. POPIJLATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?1,3,4 x
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?1,2,3 x
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, o.s6$italing the
constuction of replacement housing elsewhere?1,2,3 x
3. GEOLOGY AltD SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
5,6,7 x
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
5,6,7'x
ii) Stong seismic ground shaking?5,6,7 x
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefacticn? '-5,6,7 x
iv) Landslides?5,6,7 x
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil?1,5 x
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become trnstable as a result of the project and potentially
result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
1,6,7 x
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defrned in Table l8-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life
or property?
I,5,6 x
e) Have soils incapable of adequately suppo*ing the use of septic
tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
I x
4. IIYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?I x
-3-
\.
Issues and Supporting Sources Sources Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
-b)
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater rocharge such that there would
be a net defrcit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
l,l5 x
c)alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration ofthe course ofa stream or
river, in a maluler which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?1,8 x
d)alter the pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration ofthe course ofa stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoffin a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
1,8 x
or conkibute water which would exceed
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional soruces of polluted runoff?
1,8 x
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?1,8 x
s)housing within a 100-year haz.ardarea as mapped on
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map
or other flood hazard delineation map?
8 x
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
would impede or redirect flood flows?
structures which 8 x
i) Expose people or structures to a signifrcant risk ofloss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
1,8 x
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?1,5 x
T. Atn qUA1trfY. Where available, the siguificance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution
contol district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or
quality plan?
implementation of the applicable air 1,9 x
b) Violate auy air qualrty standard
projected air quality violation?
or contribute to an existing or 1,9 x
i) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative
threshol& for ozone precursors)?
1,9 x
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
1,9 x
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
1,9 x
-4-
e) Create
.1
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicant
Issues
Potentially
Signilicant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Signilicant
Impact
No
Impact
6. TRANSPORTATIONiTRAFFIC. Would the project::
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity ofthe street system (i.e., result
in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
1 x
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
"gency
for designated roads or highways?l,l1 x
c) Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
l,l0 x
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp
curyes or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
I x
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?I x
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?I x
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
altemative tansportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
1,11 x
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Departrnent of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?l,l2 x
b) Have a substantial or adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitve natural community identified in local or regional
plans, po^iLies, regulations or by the CalifordiaDepartnent of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
1 ,t2 x
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands
as defmed by Section 4M of the Clean Water Act (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological intemrption, or other means?
I t2 x
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native or
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
I ,t2 x
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tee preservation policy or
ordinance?
I x
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
I x
-5-
\'
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporeted
Less than
Significent
Impact
No
Impact
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Wouldthe project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
1,5 x
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
1,5 x
9. HAZARDS AI\D IIAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport use, or disposal ofhazardous
materials?l,l3 x
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
1,13 x
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
1,13 x
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962-5 and, as a result, would it create a sigaificant hazard to
the public or the environment?
13 x
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
1,10 x
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
I x
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?I x
h) Expose people or structues to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fues, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
I x
10. NOISE. Would theproject result in:
a) Exposure ofpersons to or generation ofnoise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or uoise
ordinance, or applicable standaxds ofother agencies?
1 x
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome
vibration or groundborne uoise levels?
I x
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
1 x
-6-
\'
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially
Signilicent
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
1,10 x
e) For a located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
10 x
g for a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
I x
11. PI]BLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated w iEr the provision of new or
physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the conskuction of which could
cause significant envfuonmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any ofthe public services:
a) Fire protection?I x
b) Police protection?I x
c) Schools?I x
d) Parks?1 x
e) Other public facilities?1 x
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater teatunent requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
1 x
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatrnent facilities or expansion ofexisting facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
I x
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion ofexisting facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
I x
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
I x
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatnent provider
which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to
the provider's existi.g commituents?
1 x
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient pennitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
I x
g) Comply with federal, state, and local stahrtes and regulations
related to solid waste?
I x
-7-
\
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentielly
Signilicant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less then
SigniOcant
Impact
No
Impect
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?I x
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
I x
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings?
I x
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
14. CIJLTI]RAL RESOT]RCES.the
a) Create a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in'15064.5?
x
x
I
I
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to' I 5064.5 ?
I x
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geological feature?
I x
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?x
15. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
I x
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical cffect on the environment?
I x
16. AGRICULI'URAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resouries are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Departrneut of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Impor&ance (Farrrland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuart to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
I x
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
I x
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use?
I x
-8-
I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Pot€ntirlly
Significant
Issues
Potentirlly
Signilicrnt
Unless
Mitigrtion
Incorporited
Less thrtr
Signilic.nt
Imprcl
No
Imprct
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ofthe
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to elirninate a plant or animal
communi$, reduce the number or restrict lhe range of a mre or
endatrgered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?I x
projcct have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively corxiderable? (Cumulatively considerable means that
the incremental effects of a project are considerable when i ierved
in connection with the effects ofpast projects, the effects ofother
curlent ptojects, and the effects ofprobable future prqjects)?
b) Does the 1
ect have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adyerse effects on human beings, either dtectly or
indirectly?
c) Does th€ proj
1 x
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
l1
12
t3
18. SOI]RCE RTTERENCES
The City of Burlingame General Plan, Burlingame,California,1985 and 1984 amendments-
City of Burlingame , Municipal Code, Title 25 - Zoning, Bllingarne,Califomia, I 995 edition.
City of Burlingame City Council, Housing El,ement, City of Burlingame, Bur/lingame, California, 1994.
1990 & 2000 Census
Departsnent ofthe Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Saz Francbco Bay Region, Sheet 3, l:125,000, Revised l98l-
E. Brabb, E. Pampeyaq and M. Bonilla, Landslide
t972.
Susceptibility in Sar. Mateo County; San Mateo Cou:rty, Califomi4
P erkins, I earre, M ap s Showin g
Mateo County: Califomia, 1987
Cumulative Damage Potential from Earthquake Ground Slahzg, U.S.G.S. Map MF, San
Map ofApproximate Locations of 100-year Flood Areas, from
Maps, September 16, l98l
the National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance
BAAQMD CEOA GUIDELINES, Assesshg the Air Quality Impacts of Projects and Plans, Decenbe4 1995
San Maao County Comprehensive airport Land {Jse P/az, San Fraucisco Intemational Airporl December, 1994
San Mateo Counly Congestion Management Program, 1997
Mop of Areas of Special Biological Importance, San
Fish and Game
Fra cisco aul San Mateo Co unties, Califunrta, State Oepartnent of
Slate of California Hazardous Waste and Substancer ,tires ,.ir, April 1998
-9-
Initial Study Summary I 226-1 228 Paloma Avenue
Land Use and Planning Summary: The project area is designated in the General Plan as low density
residential and is zoned R-I. The request is to change the land use designation from low density residential
to medium density residential and to rezone the area from R-l to R-2. The low density residential land use
designation provides for single family residential uses at densities of up to 8 units per acre. Most of the single
family residential subdivision in the flat areas of Burlingame are developed at densities ofbetween 5 andT
units per acre. The medium density residential land use designation, which allows development at between
9 and 20 units per acre, is meant to be occupied by duplexes and onb and two story garden aparfinent
developments. The R-l district allows development of one house per parcel. The R-2 zone district allows
development of two units on each lot, the lower end of the medium density residential land use designation.
The project area consists of 8 parcels, each 50 feet wide by 120 feet deep. Six of the parcels are now
developed with single family homes. The site at 1226-1228 Paloma Avenue contains a duplex, and there is
one four-unit aparhnent at 1225 Laguna Avenue. The duplex appears to have been built around lg4},before
the R-l zone district was established. In 1964, a use variance was granted for the constructrc;i of the four-unit
apartrnent building at 1225 Laguna Avenue. Both of these uses are now considered nonconforming in the R-l
zone district. Use variances, to allow exceptions for uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses in a zoning
district, have not been legal since the 1970's.
With the rezoning of the area from R-l to R-2, the nonconforming duplex would become a legal use. The
four-unit apartment building would retain its nonconforming status. This means that the use may remain on
the site, but if the building were destroyed, any new structure would have to comply with the zoning in place
at that time. The R-2 zone would allow construction of a duplex to replace the four-unit structure.
Maintenance and repairs to the structure would be limited to fifty percent of the value of the structure, and
the structure could not be expanded.
Although no development is proposed at this time, rezoning these parcels ftom R-l to R-2 zoning could result
in the addition of up to 6 residential units in the project area (assuming each of the parcels with single family
houses were converted to duplex use). This could result in a change to the character of the neighborhood over
time. This change in use would also act as a hansition area between the surrounding single family houses and
the more intense multiple family and commercial uses along the Broadway corridor.
The Conservation Element of the Burlingame General Plan identifies this neighborhood north of Broadway
between El Camino Real and California Drive as a "Stable Urban Area". The Conservation Element describes
this area as an area primarily devoted to single family residence an notes that the quality is good and the area
should remain stable. It recommends that a transition to apartment development in the southern portion of
the area should be considered.
Population and Housing Summary: This site and the surrounding area are planned for low density
residential uses. The change in land use designation and zoning could result in the addition of six housing
units to Burlingame's housing stock. As required by State law, the City is in the process of amending the
Housing Element of the Burlingame General Plan. The State, in association with the Association ofBay Area
Govemments, has determined that due to projected population growth the City of Burlingame needs to
provide opportunities for an additional 565 housing units within its boundaries. The change in General plan
land use designation and rezoning ofthis area to the R-2 zone distict would contribute to the accomplishment
of that goal.
-10-
Initial Study Summqry I 2 2 6- I 2 2 I Paloma Avenue
Geologic Summary: The site is flat and located in an urban setting which has been developed with
residential uses for about 60 to 80 years. The area is approximately 2 miles from the San Andreas Fault but
is not within the Alquist-Priola zone; the site is within one and one-fourth miles of the Serra Fault, a minor
thrust fault considered to have common roots with the San Andreas Fault. There are no known faults on the
site. Since no changes are being made to the structures in the projectarea, the seismic exposure will not
change. The site is relatively level and does not have a history of landsiiding. Four broad soil groups exist
in Burlingame. This site is designated as an alluvium plain which consists primarily of gravel, sand, silt and
clay deposits. Under seismic conditions, most Burlingame soils are reasonably stable. This site is in an area
ofvery low (0 - 0.2% probability) liquefaction susceptibility.
Water Summary: This site is not located near or adjacent to open waterways. The project site is located
in Flood Zone B, which is outside the 100-year flood zone. There are existing 4" water mains in Laguna,
Paloma and Capu.;hino Avenues which provide water service to these sites. There is existing capacity in the
system to accommodate the future development of up to six units in this area.
Air Quality Summary: No objectionable odors or alteration in air movement, moisture, temperature or
change in local or regional climate is anticipated to occur as a result of this proposal. The change in emissions
generated by traffic to and from any future development as compared to all development in Burlingame is
insignificant. The sites are also within easy walking distance of the Caltrain station at Broadway and major
bus routes which run along El Camino Real.
Transportation/Circulation Summary: The potential increase in the number of dwelling units will not
result in a significant increase in traffic in the area. Any new units built would have to meet the on site
parking requirements of the Burlingame zoning ordinance.
Biological Resources Summary: This site and the surrounding area have been developed with residential
uses for 60 to 80 years. There are no native plants or habitats on the site. There is no record of any rare,
unique or endarrgered species ofplants or animrals in the project area. There is no farmland in Burlingame.
Energy and Mineral Resources Summary: There is no conskuction proposed as a part of this project. If
additional rmits are built, substantial amounts of fuel will not be needed to construct, develop or maintain the
project.
Ilazards Summary: Since no construction is proposed at this time, this project is not expected to expose
people to health hazards, nor is it expected to create a health hazard. Future construction will be required to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which will ensure that people in any new structues will not be
exposed to health hazards or potential health hazards.
Noise Summlry: The site and the surrounding area has been developed for many years with residential uses,
and the project will not result in an increase in the existing ambient noise levels.' Future conskuction activities
may increase noise levels during construction. The municipal code limits construction hours to 7:00 a.m, to
7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on
Sundays.
-11-
Initial Study Summary l22Gl228 Paloma Avenue
Public Services Summary: The potential increase in the number of dwelling units on these sites is not
expected to have a sigrrificant impact on the provision ofpublic services, as this is an urbanized area with
existing public facilities in place.
Utifties and Service Systems Summary: The proposed project will be served by existing utilities in place
in the area. There are existing sewer lines which run along the rear property lines of these properties which
connect to a 21" sewer main in Juanita and California Drive and ultiinately connects to the wastewater
heatrnent facility. There is adequate capacity in these lines and at the wastewater heatnent facility to provide
service to the potential six units which could be built if the area were rezoned. Storm water from these sites
surface drains along the streets to a box culvert which runs parallel to Lincoln Avenue and connects to the
Easton Creek Channel which drains to the Bay. There are existing water lines in Lagun4 Paloma and
Capuchino Avenues which provide water service to these sites.
Aesthetics Summary: Since no change is proposed to the existing structures, there'will be no impact to the
aesthetics of the area. New construction would have to comply with the zoning ordinance requirements for
building height, floor area and lot coverage. This R-1 zoned uea, which is now subject to design review
would, ifzoned R-2, be exempt from that requirement.
Cultural Resources Summary: There are no known prehistoric or historic archeological sites in this area.
Ifany prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during any future construction, all work will
be required to be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as
determined by qualified experts, can be implemented.
Recreation Summary: The proposed project does not replace or destroy any existing or plarured recreational
facilities. There are existing refieational facilities available to serve existing and future residents ofthis area.
U:VNISTUDy\ I 22 6 Palona Initial Study.doc
-12-
REVISED REZONING PROPOSAL
No,J. 2col
N
c<t
1
a
Revised Pro ect
MAP 1: EXlSfrNG ORIGINALZONING AND
REVISED REZONING PROPOSAL FOR A
rRANS/flONR-2ZONE ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF BROADWAY. JANUARY 2OO2
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIYE DECLARATION,
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND RBZONING
RESOLVED by the CITY COTINCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a negative declaration has been proposed and applicantion has been made for a general
plan amendment from low densitv residential to medium density residential use. and rezonins from R-l to R-2
at 1224. 1226-1228 Paloma Averue. and 1225 & 1229 Paloma Avemre. 1225 & 1229 LaEtna Avenue and, 1224
& 1228 Capuchino Avenue. zoned R-1. Jerry Deal. Marearet Joscher. Belinda & Nicholas Cairns. Aldo & Lou
Ann Ghiozzi. Mark & Teresa Daszvnskv. Elenore Ron & Davina Drabkin, Albert Meyer, property
owners. APN's 026-095-080. -090. -230 & -240: 026-094-080. -090. -200 & -210:
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
November 13. 2001 . at which time it reviewed and considered the staffreport and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing and said application was denied ;
WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council_ and a hearing thereon held on Februarv 4.
2002. at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony
presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this council, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set
forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and Categorical Exemption, per Negative
Declaration No. 516-P is hereby approved.
2. It is recommended that the Council of the City of Burlingame approve said general plan
amendment from low density residential to medium density residential and rezoning from R-1 to R-2. Findings
for such general plan amendment and rezoning are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy tri'tfus resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing resolution
was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4ft day of February,2002 .and adopted
thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
S :\SIIEIAGII\2 .5\l 224,1 226 -l 22 SPabmarezme.res.doc CITY CLERK
lwuvlv llvM\v.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTME}.IT
501 PRIMBOSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
L224-a22A / L225-L229 pAroMA A\rENrrE, L225-L229
r,AGIrlrA a\tENIrE, A}ID 1224-1228 CAPTUCIIINO .AVEr{tE
Appeal of a Planning Corrnission denial of an
application for general plan amendment from
1ow density residential to medir:m density
residential and rezoning from R-1 (Single
Fanily) to R-2 (Duplex) for 2 properties and
up to 8 properties addressed t224-L228/L225-
1229 Paloma Avenue, t225-1229 Lagnrna Avenue,
and 1224-L228 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-1.
(APNs: 026-094-080, 090, 2OO,2LO; 026-O95-
080,090, 23o,24Ot
The city of Burlingame City Council
announces the following public hearing on
Mondav, Febnrarlr 4, 2002 at 7:OO P-M. in the
City Hall Council Charnlcers located at 501
Prirnrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed January 25, 2OO2
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Acopy ofthe
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
E
cAr.rrf)ir{l/r
(Please refer to other side)
__1
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (55C) 558-7250
L22 4- L228 / L225 - L229 PATOI.IA A\IENI,E, 1225 - L22 9
LACrn{A A\ZEN[E, AI.ID 1224-1228 CAP(rcHrNO A\rENtE
Appeal of a Planning Conunission denial of an
applicati-on for general plan amendment from
1ow densi-ty residential to medi-ulr density
residential and rezoning from R-1 (single
Fam:ily) to R-2 (Duplex) for 2 properties and
up to 8 properti-es addressed 1-224-1228/-J'225-
1229 Paloma Avenue, 1225-1229 La$ma Avenue,
and 1-224-1228 Capuchino Avenue, zoned R-1.
(APNs : 025-094-080, 090, 200 ,2tO; 026-095-
080,0'-:,-30,240)
The City of Burtingame city Council
announces the following public hearinq on
Wedrresday,20, 2OO2 at 7:00 P.M. in
the City HaIl Council Chambers Ioca ted at 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, California-
Maj-led FebruarY 8, 2OO2
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
to the meeting
Burlingame, C
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior to
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
Property
tenants
558-7250
Margaret
City Planner
PU
their
call (650)
E
(Please refer to other side)
\ copy ofthe
i
-I
I
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
rrEM # 5c
MTG.
DATE 2.20.02_
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUB]\{ITTED
DATE: FEBR 6.2002
APPROVED
FROM:CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF. PLANNING COMIVIISSION,S DENIAL THE REQUEST FOR A
VARIANCE FOR A F'REE STANDING SIGN AT THE UMTf,D METHODIST
CHURCH, 1443 HOWARD AVf,NUE, ZONED R-3/C-1, SUBAREA B, BURLINGAME
AVENUE COMMERGIAL AREA.
BY
BY
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should hold a public hearing and take action. Aflirmative action on the variance should
include findings of fact and should be made by resolution. The reasons for denial or denial without prejudice
(referred back to the Planning Commission) should be clearly stated for the record. Action alternatives and
the criteria for findings for a variance to the sign code are set out in the first attachment behind the staff
report.
Conditions of Approval Considered by the Planning Commission
i. thatthe addition of the freestanding sign onthe primary frontage (Howard Avenue) shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped November 15, 2001
(sheets SK3 and SKa);
2. that the changeable copy on the freestanding sign shall not exceed 9.9 SF (5'-5" wide x l'-10" tall) and
shall contain letters or graphics movable only by hand;
3. that interior illumination shall be limited to low level illumination consisting of a single fluorescent
tube or equivalent, sign illumination shall be turned off daily by an automatic system during the hours
between l0:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and
4. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Planning Commission Action
On January 14,2002, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-l (C. Keele dissenting) to
deny the request for a 7'-10" tall (6'-0" allowed) free standing sign on the Howard Avenue frontage of the
Methodist Church at 1443 Howard Avenue. In their action the commissioners noted: sign is directed at
pedestrians and cars going to Safeway across the street, seems the electric reader board portion of the sign is
placed rather low on the proposed 7 foot sign face and the driveway to Safeway across the street is in-bound
REWEW OF PL.ANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OT THE REQTTEST FORA YARANCE FORA FREE STANDING
SIGN AT THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, 1443 HOWARD AWNIIE, ZONED R-3/C-1 FEBRAARY 20' 2002
only, so might be better to put the sign down the block closer to Primrose where the Safeway trafftc exits and
i c;1be sein easily; there is a very visible sign on the front of the church on Howard, to add this sign seems
like over exposure on that frontage, while there is no good signage on the Primrose side; seems to be no
compelling need for the variance since there is other signage at the front of the church; if willing to reduce
signio thJalowed 6 foot height the church does not need Planning Commission approval because the sign is
altwed; the reader board *uta be placed at the same height as proposed and the sign reduced to 6 feet in
height iithe name of the church weie placed below the reader board on the sign face; there are other
alternative locations on the Howard frontage and on the site for placing the sign with good visibility at the
allowed 6 feet in height (down the street oion the fagade of the building). It was noted in opposition to the
motion to deny that if the sign were attached to the wall of the church the code would allow it to be 16 feet off
the ground.
BACKGROUND:
Charles Kavanaugh, representing the United Methodist Church at 1443 Howard Avenue is requesting to place
a new sign on the-Howard Avenue frontage of the church. The proposed free standing sign will have an over
all height of 7, -lo" . The sign face will bJ 5'-8' wide by 3'-8" tall (20.3 SF in area). The bottom portion of
the intlriorly lit sign face will include a changeable copy area 5'-5" wide by l'-10" tall or 9.9 SF where2}Yo
of the allowld signage or l0 SF is the maximum changeable copy area allowed. The changeable copy will be
letters, changed by hand.
On the Howard Avenue frontage of the church there are presently two existing signs: one wall sign 5.8 SF, l1
feet offthe ground and one ground sigq 16.5 SF, 4'-6" tall. The addition of the proposed sign would bring
total signag! on the HowarJfrontagelo 43.1 SF (50SF the maximum allowed) and total number of signs to 3
(3 signs maximum allowed).
There are two secondary frontages for the church. On El Camino Real there is one existing sign (3 allowed) at
16.5 SF (50 SF allowed). On primrose there is one existing sign (3 allowed) at 12 SF (50 SF allowed). No
change is proposed to the existing secondary frontage signage with this proposal.
History of Project
tn luly ZOo0, tlie United Methodist Church approached the city asking to add message board sign on the
churcir property at 1443 Howard Avenue. Risearch revealed that the portion ofthe property where the sign
was to Ue ptacea was zoned R-3. Since the proposed sign was to be illuminated and the code prohibited lit
signs in the residenti al zone,this application could not be processed. The church responded by requesting a
reToning of the residentially ron.d portion of the site to commercial (C-l) to match the zoning on the eastern
half of ihe church site. the planning Commission reviewed this request at study on Novembet 27,2000,
continued the item on a 6-1 vote, ani directed staffto look at amending the sign code to allow churches to
have illuminated signs in residential zones. Subsequently staffprocessed a major revision to the sign code
which included new sign regulations for nonresidential uses in residential zones. The revisions to the sign
code became effective on rvray T, zooL Commission asked the applicant in July 2000, if they wished to
proceed with the rezoning request to clean up the conflicting zoning on the site. The applicant was not
interested in continuirg;ith ihe rezoning request since the signage issue had been resolved; and dropped the
request to rezone the pioperty. The p.opi.ryi"mains with the western portion zonedR-3 multiple family
residential and the "urt.* po.tior, (froniing Primrose) zoned C-l (retail commercial, Subarea B of the
Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area).
StaffComments
planning staffwould refer the Council to the comparative table for existing signage and proposed signage on
the site in the attached planning Commission staffreport (page 3) for a clear description ofthe existing and
o
REYIEW OF PLANNING COA{]VTISSION'S DENUL OF THE REQUEST FOR A VARANCE FOR A FREE STANDING SIGN AT
THE A,TETHODIST CHURCH, 1443 HOWARDAVENUE, ZONED R-J/C-L FEBRUARY 20, 2OO2
propose signs, listing of the new code requirements for nonresidential signage in residential zones, and for the
compliance of existing signage on site with the new code requirements. Staff would also note that the
revisions of the sign code eliminated "sign exceptions" which had a lesser standard for granting and replaced
the exception with a variance. Findings for a variance must be based on hardships on the property as well as
on the pattern of signage in the area. (See Action alternative attachment) The fourth finding for a sign
variance is different than for a planning variance and it reads:
"that the signage for the variance sought will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, and character
of existing and potential signage of properties in the general vicinity."
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Action Alternatives and Requirements for Findings for a Sign Variance
Monroe letter January 28,20A2, to Bryant Zimmerman, President Board of Trustees, The United Methodist
Church of Burlingame, setting appeal hearing
Charles Kavanaugh letter January 18,2002 to City Clerk
Planning Commission Minutes January 14,2002
Planning Commission StaffReport, January 14,2002, with attachments
Resolution with Exhibit A, conditions
Notice of Public Hearing, mailed February 8,2002
ACTION ALTERNATIVES
l. City council may vote in favor of an applicant's request. If the action is a variance, use
permit, hillside irea construction permit, fence exceptiorq sign exception or exception to
the antenna ordinance, the Council must make findings as required by the code. Findings
must be particular to the given properties and request. Actions on variances and use
permits ihould be by resolution. A majority of the Council members seated during the
public hearing must aglee in order to pass an affirmative motion.
Z. City Council may deny an applicant's request. The reasons for denial should be clearly
stated for the record.
3. City Council may deny a request without prejudice. This action should be used when the
application made to the City Council is not the same as that heard by the Planning
C-o-mmission; when a Planning Commission action has been justifiably, with clear
direction, denied without prejudice; or when the proposed project raises questions or
issues on which the Council would like additional information or additional design work
before acting on the project. Direction about additional information required to be given
to staff, applicant *d Pl*t irg Commission/City Council for the further consideration
should be made very clear. Council should also direct whether any subsequent hearing
should be held before the City Council or the Planning Commission.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FINDINGS FOR A SIGN VARIANCE
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property , ,.r"h * size, shape, topography, street frontage, or sulrounding land use, that
do not apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting ofthe application is necessary forthe preservation and enjoyment of a
subitantial property right ofthe applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or
unnecessary hardshiP;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to properly or
impiovements in ttre vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience;
(d) that the signage for the variance is sought will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass,
and character of existing and potential signage of properties in the general vicinity.
1443 Howard Avenue, February 20,2002
.ffiW
CITY OF BTIRLINGAME
Plming Deparrrent
City Hall -5Ol Prirc R@d
Buliagam, Cdibrnia 94OIG39Y,
January 28,2002
Bryant K. Zimmerman, President
Board of Trustees
The United Methodist Church of Burlingame
1443 Howard Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94011
At the City Council meeting of January 24,2002, the Council called up your
project at 1443 Howard Avenue-zoned R-3/C-1. A public hearing will be held on
February 20,2002 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, CA.
We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me ifyou
have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Tel. (650) 55E-72S
!*t
Margaret
City Planner
MIv{/s
l443HOWA..rcc
Charles L. Kavanaugh
City Clerk
Dear Mr Zimmerman,
c:
Tbe
UNITED
METHODIST
CHURCH
of Burlingame
1443 Howard Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
TeL (650) 344-632t
Fax (650) 344{185
info@budumc.com
www.burlumc.org
Dr. Nymphas R Edwards
SR. PA.sroR
Ricbard A. Th/nr
AssocIATE PAsroR
Ursah Moryenstrn
OFFICE MANAGER
City Glerk
Crty cf Burlingame
ff'oruo
Jan18, r**W
Endosed is the Church's cfrcck for $250 to cover the fee prescribed for an
The United Methodist Churct of Burlingame hereby appeals to the City
Counciltfre decision of the Plannirp Cofirmission on.lantnry 14, in
dmying th Churfi's application for a variane in its permit tb erect a
lighted.sig! gn its property at 1443 Howard Ave. to afiow the proposed
grg!. to be 7 leet and 10 inches high, rather than the six foot timit imposed
by the permit proposed by the Planning Commission.
The Churdr asks that the Clty Courrcil direct the Planning Commissbn b
authorize te corstuction of a fighted sign, with cnarppabte btters, cm the
Church's property at the comer of El Camim Real afu Horard Ave., to a
height cf 7 feet, 10 irxrles.
ln additim to the clearly stated need for the Churfi to have sucfi a shn at
trn deBnated locatiori,vve ncte partiarlarlythatthere is an l&foot sign,
lighted nQht and.clay, directy aoross Howard Ave. from the site cf SE
proposed Church sign.
United Methodist church
of Burlingame
Board of Trusteess
EOITRABLE UAYOR AND CITY COIIT|CIL:
AN APPEAL EEARING SEOIILD BE SET }:,,''::.-.
EOB 2l,4l02 FOR]'1443 EOTTARD.
ANN }IUSSO. CITY CI.ERK
L Kavanagh tr
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes January 14,2002
is the height intrusion on the west side, not as concerned with the area over the garage. Share
the declining height exception on the left side.
Chairman Vistica if the maker of the motion and second would agree to add the condition about the
landscaping. They
Discussion on the motion still concemed about the use of the room over the garage as a second
unit, canwe add a it will never be used as a second unit? Could understand concern if it were
not accessible from inside
without revising the entire
house or detached way back in the rear yard, can't see away to eliminate
shower possible; closest is in the master bedroom, otherwise must go downstairs; can the second sink
be converted into a shower,
Chairman Vistica asked if the of the motion and the second would agree to add a condition that
would state that the bedroom at the the garage would never be converted into a second dwelling
rurit. The maker of the motion and the agreed.
plan; could eliminate the 4 inch waste line which would make a toilet and
Chairman Vistica called for a roll call vote on
bedroom would not be used as a second unit)
twice amended motion (for landscaping and clarify rear
approve the application. The motion passed 5-2 (Cers.
Keele and Osterling dissenting). Appeal were advised. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m.
1443 HO\ilARD AYENUE - ZONED R.3/C.T - APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT OF
FREESTANDING SIGN (CHARLES L. KAVANAGH, APPLICANT; UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
OF BURLINGAME. PROPERTY OWNER)PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report,l.l4.02,with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments. Four conditions were suggested forconsideration. There were no questions of staff from
the commission.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Charlie Kavanagh, Kavanagh Engineering,4TA Chatham
Road, and member of the church, represented the United Methodist Church, with Brian Zimmerman,
President of the Church's Bomd of Trustees, and Nemphis Edwards, Senior Pastor. Noted that they had
been working on this sign permit since July of 2000, including considering a rezoning, ultimately the city
revised the sign code, establishing standards for institutional uses in residential zones; the height limit in
these new standards is 6 feet, but with cars parked along the curb, it will take a 7'-10" sign to be seen by
passing cars, so are asking for a variance for height, it will not impact the views from residential uses since
there are none nearby. Commissioner asked what market this sign is targeted toward, pedestrian or
automobile. Applicant noted both, lot of cars exiting Safeway will see it and pedestrians walk by, but
primary orientation is toward the Safeway lot. Conmrissioners noted that the head of a pedestrian is a bit
taller than a parked car, the changeable copy portion of the sign was placed rather low on the proposed 7'-
10" face, and the Safeway driveway across the street is in bound only, even at proposed height will be hard
to see, would you consider putting the sign dow4 the block (owmd Primrose) by the classroom building
where cars exiting Safeway will be able to see it easily; applicant noted considered moving toward El
Camino but there were traffic and auto safety issues; Could the sign go on Howard toward Primrose,
applicant noted know there is some landscaping there where could put it but do not know what would be
disturbed. Commissioner noted have a very visible church sign at the front of the church to add this seems
like over exposure on that frontage when there is no sign on the classroom side. Commissioner noted that
the problem with the sign at the front is the height variance needed, the sign is in effect an advertisement and
7
Cif of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Janaary 14,2002
there is no compelling need for the variance. Commissioner noted that if the sign were attached to the
building it could be as high as 12 feet offthe gro-und without a variance.
Applicant noted that the members of the church had this same discussion two years ago and selected this
site, the location of the sign should be left to the church, church is having aproblem keeping up membership,
they need to decide what will be most effective for them, key is that the sign is lighted and visible at night
since the other signs menot; memberswill discussthe things youmentioned buttheyneedthe Commission
to act tonight. Applicant continued want the maximum benefit from the sigrr, notjust for the sake ofthe sign
but to get the message out about the church's programs, if stay within the rules do not get an effective sign
and the church cannot meet their agenda; do not want to come back an badger the Commission. There were
no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner discussion: if willing to reduce sign to 6 feet don't need to come back; staffnoted that that
was correct.
C. Bojuds moved by resolution to deny the request for a variance for sign height, could get the reader board
at the same height as the 7 foot sign if the name of the church were placed below the reader portion of the
sign and there are other alternative for placing the sign for good visibility at 6 feet, either down the street or
on the fagade of the building. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: do not want to see a variance, how the sign is configured is up to the congregation;
would grant a variance ifthere were no other place to put the sign, but since there is will support the motion.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to deny the height variance for the sign. The motion
passed 6-l (C. Keele dissenting) on a voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
9:00 p.m.
8. 1177 AIRPORT
DECLARATION,
- ZONED C.4 _ APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATTVE
USE PERMITS TO EXCEED TTM BAYFRONT DESIGN
GUIDELINES AND FOR ACCESS TO PARKING AND PAID SELF-PARKING FOR A
REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN TING HOTEL (JONATHAN WINSLOW, WINSHIP
PA OPERTIES, APPLICANT; NADEL INC., ARCHITECT; AIRPORT BOI.,LEVARD
Reference staff report, I . I 4.02, with including the MitigatedNegative Declaration. CP Monroe
presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirty conditions were suggested for
consideration. Commissioners asked staff:areawas counted as the front ofthe lot, Planner indicated
the area on the plans; trees being proposed for are large and evergreen, being replaced with smaller
scale and deciduous, applicant needs to address;CE what the parking lot illumination requirements
were, he noted city uses public health and safety
illumination than necessary in parking lot, worried
from the commission.
applicant seems to be providing a lot more
offsite. There were no further questions
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Jonathan Winslow,
Properties spoke about the project along with April Philips, the
the applicant Winship
architect for the project.
Reviewed the developer's credentials, the issues addressed from the last noted was still tying to
work out parking with the Parks and Recreation Director and baseball to work with them;
noted they are sensitive to the parking lot lighting issue and will not install more light than police and fire
8
City of Burlingame
Variancefor Height of Freestanding Sign
Address: 1443 Howard Avenue Meeting Date: lll4l02
Request: Variance for height of freestanding sign within a residential district (C.S. 22.31.040)
Applicant: Charles L. Kavanagh, Kavanagh Engineering APN: 029-221-010 & -020
Property Owner: United Methodist Church of Burlingame Lot Area: 43,2345F
General Plan: Medium High Density ResidentiaVShopping and Service Zoning: R-3/C-l
Adjacent Development: Commercial, Retail, Food Establishments, and Multifamily Residential
CEQA Status: 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(a), (b), (c) consists of construction, or
placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities,
including but not limited to: (a) On premise signs.
History: In July 2000, the United Methodist Church wanted to place a message board sign on their
church property at 1443 Howard Avenue and submitted an application for a sign exception. In
researching the project, it was discovered that the portion of the property where the sign was to be
located is zoned R-3, while the eastern half of the site is zoned C-l (see aerial and site plan date
stamped November 15, 2001). The proposed sign was to be illuminated, and illuminated signs were
prohibited in the R-3 zone district.
In order to clean up the split zoning on the site, and to be able to install an illuminated sign, the
church applied to rezone the R-3 portion of the site to C-1. This application was considered by the
Planning Commission on Novemb er 27,2000. The commission, by a 6-0 vote, continued the item,
and directed staffto look at an amendment to the sign code to allow interior illumination for church
signs in residential zones. Planning staffprocessed an extensive amendment to the sign code which
included new regulations for nonresidential uses in residential districts. The sign code amendment
took effect on May 7,2001and is described in the sunmary below. The applicant has now dropped
the request to rezone the R-3 portion of the site C-l.
In July 2000, the commission also asked the applicant to consider rezoning the entire site to the R-3
zone district in order to clean up the dual zoning on the site. The applicant is not interested in
pursuing such an action at this time.
Summary: The applicant, Charles Kavanagh, representing the United Methodist Church of
Burlingame, is requesting a variance for height for a new freestanding sign on the primary frontage
(facing Howard Avenue). This site consists of two parcels and is located on a triangular block
bounded by Howard Avenue, El Camino Real, and Primrose Road and has frontages on all three
streets. The church parking lot is located on a separate parcel at the corner of Howard Avenue and
Primrose Road. Howard Avenue is considered to be the primary frontage, while El Camino Real
and Primrose Road are considered secondary frontages. The westem half of the lot containing the
main church building is zoned R-3 and the eastern half at the corner of Howard and Primrose is
zoned C-1. The applicant is proposing to add a new freestanding sign on the primary frontage
between the sanctuary and the existing ground sign at the comer of Howard Avenue and El Camino
Real. The proposed new sign is located on the portion of the site zoned R-3.
ttem#*
Action Item
Yariancefor Height of Sign 1443 Howard Avenue
The amended sign code (Chapter 22.31- Commercial and Institutional Signs Within Residential
Districts) allows 3 signs, 50 SF per frontage with interior illumination in the R-3 zone district. The
maximum height allowed for a freestanding sign in the R-3 zone is 6' above adjacent grade. The
amended sign code also allows changeable copy on the sign, not to exceed 10 SF (C.S. 22.12.010,
b and 22.29.010).
The proposed single-faced freestanding sign measures 5'-8" wide x 3'-8" tall,20.8 SF in area. The
overall height of the freestanding sign is 7'-10", as measured from adjacent grade, where 6'-0" is
the maximum height allowed for a freestanding sign in this zone. The bottom portion of the sign
will contain changeable copy. The changeable copy area measures 5'-5" wide x l'-10" tall, 9.9 SF
in area. The sign code limits changeable copy to ZAYo of the permiued signage. Since the permitted
signage on this frontage is 50 SF, the maximum area of the changeable copy is 10 SF (9.9 SF
proposed). The proposed sign will be internally lit and will be required to be turned off by an
automatic system during the hours between l0:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. The applicant is requesting
the following:
Variance for sign height required for 7'-10" where 6'-0" is the maximum allowed.a
The existing and proposed signs on the primary and second frontages are described in Table I
below. Currently, there is a double-faced ground sign situated diagonally at the corner of Howard
and El Camino Real. Staffdetermined that one side of the sign (facing Howard) counts towards that
frontage, and the other side (facing El Camino Real) counts towards the El Camino Real fronkge.
Currently on the primary frontage, there is one wall sign (l'-l l' X 3'-0u, 5.8 SF) and one ground
sign (12'-5u X 1'-4u, 16.5 SF). On the secondary frontage facing El Camino Real, there is one
ground sign (12'-5" X l'-4u, 16.5 SF), and on the secondary frontage facing Primrose Road, there
is one pole sign (3' X 4',12 SF). There are no changes proposed to the existing signs. All other
sign code requirements have been met.
Table I - 1443 Howard Avenue - United Methodist Church Of
2
EXISTING SIGNS
Pastor and Hours
Wall Sim
l'-11'x3'-0"
5.8 SF
'-0'11 I
United Methodist Church
Ground Sign
l2'-5" X l',-4u
16.5 SF
4',-6"I
22.3 SF t-0ull 2EXISTING SUBTOTAL
Table 1 continued on next page.
Avenue)
'Size/Area Height Number
Yariancefor Height of Sign
Table I
I Variance for height of freestanding sign (7'-l0" proposed where 6'-0" is allowed).
1443 Howard Avenue
PROPOSED SIGNS
5',8u X 3',-8u
20.8 SF
5'-5u X 1',-10u
9.9 SF
United Methodist Church
Freestanding Sign
Changeable Copy w/in Sign
343.1 SF I l'-0uTOTAL
16'(wall)
6' (freestanding)
3Zoning Code Allows
Chanseable Copy Allowed 10 SF (20% of s0 SF)
50 SF
EXISTING SIGNS
4'.-6"IUnited Methodist Church
Ground Sign
l'-4'x 12'-5"
16.5 SF
PROPOSED SIGNS - None
350 SF 6',-0'Zoning Code Allows
EXISTING SIGNS
13',X4',
12 SF
8'-0uUnited Methodist Church
Pole Sign
PROPOSED SIGNS - None
20'-0'3Zoning Code Allows 50 SF
3
Size/Area Height NumberPrimary Frontage
(Howard Avenue)
7'-1o',r I
Secondary Frontage
(El Camino Real)
Size/Area Height Number
Secondary Frontage
(Primrose Road)
Size/Area Height Number] '
Variancefor Height of Sign 1443 Howard Avenue
Staff Comments: The Chief Building Official, City Engineer and Fire Marshal reviewed the
application and had no comments.
Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission study meeting on December 10, 2001, the
Commission noted that the name of the church appears on other signs on the Howard Avenue
frontage, so church identification on the proposed sign is less important (December 10, 2001 P.C.
Minutes). The Commission requested that the applicant consider reversing the location of the reader
board and the name of the church on the proposed sign so that the sign could be reduced to six feet
in height, and therefore the variance for sign height can be eliminated.
The applicant points out that the church is zoned R-3, but the surrounding properties are zoned
commercial with Safeway and Walgreens located across the street. He also notes that Safeway has
an 18' tall sign. The applicant feels that with the church building measuring approximately 45' tall,
the proposed 8' tall sign will not look out of place.
Required Findings for Yariance for Sign: In order to grant a variance relating to height of signs
the Planning Commission must apply the following circumstances (Code Section 22.06.110, b, i-iv):
(1) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property,
such as size, shape, topography, sfreet frontage, or surrounding land use, that do not apply
generally to property in the same district;
(ii) the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship;
(iiD the granting of the application will not be defiimental or injurious to property or improvements
in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or
convenience; and
(iv) that the signage for which the variance is sought will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass,
and character of existing and potential signage of properties in the general vicinity.
4
In a written response, dated December 26,2001, the applicant notes that reversing the reader
board and church rurme and reducing the overall sign height would lower the changeable copy by
approximately 8 inches from what is now proposed and would reduce the overall sign height by
2 feet. This would not achieve the church's goal of having a recognizable sign higher than the
vehicles in front of the sign parked along Howard Avenue. The church name located at the top
of the reader board sign will help to attract attention to the sign. Other signs with the church name
have either small letters (lT+" high) or very low, unlit letters. No changes have been made to the
proposed sign since the snrdy meeting.
I
Yariancefor Height of Sign 1443 Howsrd Avenue
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing.
Affirmative action should include findings made for the variance requested. Reasons for any action
should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
that the addition of the freestanding sigr on the primary frontage (Howard Avenue) shall be
built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped
November 15,2001 (sheets SK3 and SK4);
that the changeable copy on the freestanding sign shall not exceed 9.9 SF (5'-5" wide x 1'-
l0" tall) and shall contain letters or graphics movable only by hand;
that interior illumination shall be limited to low level illumination consisting of a single
fluorescent tube or equivalent; sign illumination shall be turned offby an automatic system
during the hours between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and Califomia
Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Ruben Hurin
Planner
c. Charles L. Kavanagh, Kavanagh Engineering, applicant
2.
3.
4.
5
CITY
I.TO ORDER
SEATING OX'
III. ROLL
IV.MII\ruTES
COMMISSION
501 Road,
December 10,2001
7:00 P.M.
Council
Chairman Vistica
Vistica thanked
and ahalfmonths temporary service to the
recruited to fill two seats permanently.
the commission the opporhmity,
their selection of a and the starnina of
noted he would
commmity.
being seated,
Planning
Present:
Vistica
the December I, regular meetiirg of the
to order at7:05
ChuckMink and Key for
to follow the of
Visticathen two new
Keele and
Auran,Brownrigg, Keele,and
Margaret Momoe;ErikaLewit; City
Attorney, Larry CityEngineer, Syed
The minutes of November 26,2001 regular of the
lot has been
Commissioners:
Ciry
while
'C. Mink
the Council on
property. She
of tlre General
Commission approved as mailed.
V. 'APPROVAL AGEI\IDA There changes to the
YI. f,'ROM FLOOR 2415 Adeline spoke noting that a,
across the sheet
this development
her on the Sisters of
the Open Space
In addition, the pmking will
congested create unsafe
from the City of that was proposed.
APPROVAL OF'
YI[. STUDY ITEMS
1443 HO}YARD AYEI\IT]E _ ZONED R.3/C.1 - APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR HEIG}IT OF
FREESTANDING SIGN (CHARLES L. KAVANAGH, APPLICANT; IJMTED METHODIST CHURCH
OF RIIRT,INGA PROPERTY OWNF,R)PI,ANNF,R : RI IREN HI IRIN
CP Momoe presented a sunmary of the staffreport. Cornmissioners asked: ifthe applicant has considered
reversing the location of the reader board and the name of the Church on the proposed sign, so that the sign
the traffic at ths
received "r"yi{"
/
l.
City of Burlingame PlanningCommissionUnapprwedMimttes December 10, 2001
could be reduced to 6 feet in height and the variance for the height of the sign could be eliminated, the
name of the church appears on other signs on that street frontage so identification on this sign is less
important There were no other comments from the commissioners.
This item was set for the regular action calendar on Janqary l4,2}02,all the information has been submitted
and reviewed by the Planning Deparhnent in time. This item concluded at7:16 p.w.
2. 1177 BO zonmD _ APPUCATION MITIGATED
USE TO TIIE DESIGN
PARKING FOR A AND TO AN
NADEL(JONATIIAN WINSHIP,,
be
being considered
the neglected, canthe
the concemed the lack of
howwillthe
the hotel's
seems to be a
will be
proposed and
frontage of site,
why are
poplartrees
in the scale
the pattem
this should
BO HOTEL LLC,owNER)
presented a of the staffreport.the applicant proposing to
fence around entire site, and will the fence include along its elrtire
sportingevents adjacentpark, please
hotelparkinglo(the "tee lights',
will it be visible off site; applicant present samples ofthe Mylar
to see that
with the s work with CalTrans
glad will be a new fence along
at ttre entrance hotel, the present fence and
enter into withCalTransto and maintain
on the site, vines are not for all the
good well maintained landscaping the entireperimeter
site. Staffshould howthefront gotfrom80%
ttris project; the should showthe reductions in
frrceway
freeway
30oloandnow to9Yo
onaplanandexplain
whythe current is necessary.
Commission continued: the shouldworkwiththe league andcityto set a
list of for the parking with Bayside Park i.e. zuch things as fr,ee,
accessible,tothepublic and parking spaces are discrepancies the
parking on the plans and io th" staffreport,The.applicant should lll ,.
detail they chose the of the new roof screen a bigger impact than existing
perrthouse for example would lopsided;
withinthethe landscapingat sheet, some ofthe
lotwillbeand (plants incagesand ). Wouldliketo see study
tighting onthe site,will the mainblock ofthe be liq wouldnotlike see flood lightingof
the structure. Project improve safety and access Park ifa into the park
put at the entry since parents will cross the the cross walks could be mmked
of
,
being put in cages; would more information ultimate siz.elscale.the
the; will scale against the treebackdrop,treesshould
There were no further from the
set forthe next regular action afterthe inforrnationhas
ctncluded at
This
by the Planning Department.
-2-
P.ft'
and
t
a
RE
9425 METH.06
0t.1226
Ruben Hurin
Burlingame Planning Dept.
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, Ca.94010
Very truly yours,
KAVANAGH ENGINEERING
KAVANAGH ENGINEERING
708 CAROLAN AVENUE . BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 579-'1944 . FAX: (650) 579-1960
United Methodist Church ofBurlingame,1443 Howard Ave.
SIGN PERMTT APPLTCATTON #2 -- RESPONSE TO STUDY QUESTTON
I{EIGHT VARIA}',ICE FRoM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET STILL REQUESTED
Dear Ruben:
ReferenceourApplication#2dated01.1109. TheitemwasdiscussedforSTUDYatthePlanning
Commission's Decernber 10, 2001 meeting. I was at the meeting and heard the discussion and agree
with the draft Minutes you fa:rcd to me 0l.l2l3 stating the commissionet's question as follows:
...if the applicant has considered reversing the location of the reader board and the name of the
church on the proposed sign, so that the sign could be roducd to 6 feet in height and the variance for
the height of the sign could be eliminatod? The name of the church appetrs'on other signs on that
street frontage so identification on this sign is less irnportmt.
I brought this question to the church Board of Trustees at their meeting on Decenrber 18.
Attached for ready reference is a copy sketch SK-4 showing the signs. In summary, the church
feels as follows:
I. REVERSING THE READER BOARD AND LOWERING TI# SIGN TO 6 FEET
lower the changeable copy about 8" from what is now proposed and would reduce the
of the sigt by about 2 fwt. This would not achieve our goal of having a
higher than the parked cars in front ofthe sign. The reader board (church
at the top will help to attract attention to the sign. Other signs with the church name have
either small (1-3la'high) letters or, very low, unlit letters.
2. ADJACENT SIGN FOR SAFEWAY IS 18 FEET HIGH. The zoning for the area of the
proposed sign may be R-3, but the environment of the nearby area is commercial with Safeway
and Walgreens right across the street. The church structure is about 45 feet high. A sign 8 feet
high is certainly not going to look out ofplace. This is the normal height per the sign company.
The proposed sign is important for the church. We hope you now have enough information to
make an informed decision on our request for a height variance. We will attend the ACTION
meetrng Monday, Ian. 14,2002,7:00 p.m. in case you have further questions.
RECEIVED
DEC 2 7 2001
ClTY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Bryant Zimmermarq President Board
of Trustees
CIVIL DESIGN . SURVEYING . UTILITIES
SINCE 1983
cc:
Nymphas Edwards, Pastor
This
I t}. i\t{/ t (
')r '\
E)ilSTING EUCALYPTUS TREES (BEYOND)
\i t\
EXIEI:SToR 5 t6N
t
L
./,;.)
t:
:\
I
I
i
I,r
t it
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
ZoNE EaN
LoT +LoT g
=Gf-
;+f
4 LTNES
TEXT
VNRIE'
+x+
PAST
5TL
EFRNME
/l3
CHAPEL
m'
I =2
u-9--ot C,
KAVANAGH EERING
708 CAROUN AVE.
BURLINGAME, CA.
'( ((t ttl
t/1t
PROPOSED CEURCE SIGN
(PROGRAM)
EXSTINGCHIJRCH SIGN
(NAME ONLD
PfiRKED CAR
E 6, PER,6ON?OFI LE
=LO
-t
to
m
'"'t
l-T'--9l-+
I
s;olri
ml
I"taa, I
=\&.
t
.NI
-l
s-1
__!_
".+GI_!_
t r.r..o - --n
T]NITED METHODIST CHURCH- BURLINGAME
::i.-.r"." " (z_3/DED aNc, FA,DN.
I
S
..- \
2 -{L r - lt U"Z
il-lr \,EXISI CHUKCH 9I6N (N &ME ONLY
c oNC,
FN DM,
t 9ro
ll- 9 -ol clTY REVlEu./
UNITED METHODIST CHURCE OT BURLINGAME
1443 BOWARD AVE.
PROFILE & DETAILS SK-4
EKIST PA 5TO R
aA\ sl6N
2.5'w tDE
PRO?OSED ?RO6R8 M
s t6 N
(,
-t
_l=l
..1..
-'l.tg 5"at
AUNUNGAME
UNtrED METtrODIST
GUICf,
NYMl[S TDWARDS
RE]ADTAYLOR
DIRECTOI OF YOU'flI
N-tctwYDNo
tUNDAY$ilV|CES
,mA.M. llrmA.M.
0UI\ITID ivIITflODIST CrlURCN
OT BURLINOA}IT
BIG POT LUCK
SATURDAY, JUNE 18 6 p.m.
BRNG WHA'T YOU WANT
] FATHER'S DAY !!!!!!!!!! I
YTI
*--t-- gPnNlSH TILE
-1---u
No,20858
fu.caoos
\t-l t";t igzd (6s0) 57St0il.l
9401G2711
1
/^wl
K-3
i
I I
It,
'r,
IE,
-J
\u t"=Z'
Type of application: Design Review- Conditioqal Use Permit- Variance-
Special Permit- Other 2 PL-Parcel Number:-
crTy oF BURLTNGAME PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT sol PRIMROSE ROAD P (650) Ss8-7250 r (650) 696-3790
APPLICATION TO TTIE PLANNING COMMISSION
t443 llouta Dv,#PN O L9 * ZZI ^O I
O/
\t$.
.ToTProject address
APPLICANT
Name
Address
Phone (w)
*
to citv/s
Phone
PROPERTY OWNER
3
ce,
,+J
loI
(w)
(h)(h)/l
t,(*_o Ie5ilwii)s(
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER/
Name
Address
City/State/Zip:
Phone (w)
PR D
Please indicate with an asterisk *
the contact person for this project.
RECEIVED
Et7,
e J e t7
No\/ 1 5 2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
ANNING DEPT
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certiff under penalty of perjury that the information
given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
Applicant's out", /l - 9 -ol
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
app lication to the Planning Commission.
Property owner's
q
t
PCAPP.FRM
I
oate: ftan- ?, )q t
I ,
Il.15.Dr
:tr
nP)
crTy oF BURLTNGAME PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P (650) s58-7250 F (650) 696-3790
Sign Permit Application
1 this
AD OF
Building depth:t+F'
@ *) i7e^ts4+
[asol rze^t96o._-.-7--
RECEIVING NEW SIGN(S)
Assessor'sParcel * oZ9:2Zl ^O/ O
Company and V Fax
I certify under penalty of perjury lhat the information given herein is true and correct the best of my lcnowledge and belief,,
I understand a building permit b required before a sign can be installed.
Signature Date ^9^O
2.
3
Building
3. PRO TYO
I r,t
"fo Lot depth:Loo
3
Lot width:
:6321
I lorcw about the proposed sign(s) and authoqize the applicant to submit this application.
Date n "-?, z'- |a
4. SIGN
f,re-i, Ed ,'Tr v6Tees
# of existing signs on proposed new*signs:
# of existing signs to total # signs:
5. SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING WITH THIS APPLICATION
/site plan of properly with all. existing and proposed signs labeled.
/elevations drawn to scale of all new signs and existing signs to remain. Show correct sizes and locations.
. Dimension all lettering.
TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING STAFF
maximum sign area
and number of signs
allowed:
maximum allowed
above first story (12'
from grade):
proposed with this
application:
primary frontage:
secondary
frontage:
ct Sign exception required
trBuildingpermitmaybeapproved.Approvedby:Date:
o Fee to be collected by Building
the sign can be installed.
Remember! A building permit must be issued before
SICNPERFRM
,I
a
ef
SIGN A: New Sign -L Existing, no change Existing, ncw copy
Pn sroR
type:
wall sign
ground sign
pole sign
projecting sign
awning sign
Sign area
(length I 2 x height
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD P (650) 558'7250 F (650) 696'3790
Sign Specifications:
1.)
Sign
}(
D
CI
tr
tr
tr
overalt height from ground Jl,' ( tb' qrllo-"J )
clearance from ground to sign bottom +
other
-
X single face trvo-sided
copy 5 5
HoursMethod of support Illumination type
SIGN B: X New Sign Existing, no change Existing, new copy
,,r,nfrf.oP PRo6 R n/vl
D wall sign
D ground sign
E Pole sign
D projecting sign
D awning sign
D other
Sign Specifications:ZSign arca
(lcngth r67 x height 3,67 7
overall height from ground I
clearance from ground
x single face
to sign bottom
two-sided
overall height from ground
clearance from ground to sign bottom
:"!lgle face two-sided
balloar-
single face trryo-sided
copy
HoursMethod of support Illumination tYPe
SIGN C: New Sign X Existing, no change Existing, new copy
Sign
D
7.
D
o
D
o
*{!4ME cAI LY Sign Specifications:
Sign arca 16. Lr
(length I Z,+' x height 1,3' 1
wall sign
ground sign
pole sign
projecting sign
awning sign
LcoPy HoursMethod of support Illumination tYPe
SIGN D: New Sign Existing, no changc Existing, new copy
t)?e:
wall sign
ground sign
Sign Specifications
Sign area
(length x height
-)
Sign
D
D
tr
&
E]
sffiffu,-
other
copy
Method of support Illumination type Hours
SIGNPER.FRM
ro sdtlr
ClTy oF BURLTNCAME PLANNING DEP.4.iTN,IENT 301 PRIMROSE I(OAD P (650) 5s8-7250 Ir (650) 696-3790
SIGN EXCEPTION APPLICATION
RECEIVED
No\/ 1 5 200t
CITY OF BURLINGAME
3 wd LANNING D EPT
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY RECETVING
1. Applicant (person completing this form)Name L
Telephone i-79 ^
i
& Address ;
ENGINEER
Fax #E7.9-196O t certdy under penalty ofperiury that the information given herein is tnte and
correct to tlrc best of nry lotowledge and belief'
Signature Dare /l-9 -ol
Z, Has the applicant rcad Sectio n22,06,ll0of the Burlingamc Municipal Codefes] noY-/
3. Describe t5e exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to your property
which do not generally apply to other properties in your area, and the extent to which
you deserve special consideration to which your neighbors are not cntitled-
EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. We request an exception for the height of the
sign from 6 feet to 8 feet because there is street parking in front of the sign and a sign
6 feet high would essentially be blocked by parked cars and not fulty visible to the
community. We are the only church fronting Howard Ave. and, we believe, the only
church in Burlingame having commercial properties across the street, such as Safeway
and Walgreens which have much higher, lighted signs.
4. Describe why the exccption is necessarT now to preserve the continued use and
enjoyment of the ProPertY.
WHY NEEDED. lt is important for the church to be able to promote its programs which
benefit the community. These programs are educational, musical, and spiritual and are
open to the public. Special programs are for the homeless and people in need. The
congregation is aging and we feel a modest, well placed sign will help attract younger
people who live in this area.
5. What hardships would result if your requested were denied?
HARDSHIPS lF DENIED. Attendance at church programs will suffer. Expenses for
printing and mailing our newsletter, and for print advertisements, are increasing while
iheir effectiveness is decreasing. Without effective visual communication, such as a
sign high enough to see, the church will be limited in its service to the community.
SIGNEXC.FRM
the City HalI
50L Primrose
Council Chambers
Road, Burlingame,
located at
California.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PBIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) ss8-7250
L443 EOI.IARD AVENUE
Application for variance for height of
freestanding sign at L443 Howard Avenue,
zoned R-3/C-1. (APN z O29-221--010;020)
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Monday,ilanuari, ]-4, 2OO2 at 7:OO P-M- in
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
y be reviewed prior
I Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
Mailed ,JanuarY 4, 2002
(Please refer to other side)
Acopy ofthe
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
s58-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
CITY OF BURLINGAME
{A 3- } $',{}'|"tfa
(Please refer to other side)
CE
--1
j RESOLUTION APPROYING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AI\[D VARIANCE FOR SIGN HEIGIIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a variance
for sign height for a new freestanding sign at 1443 Howard Avenue, zoned R-3/C-1. United Methodist Church
of Burlingame. property owner. APN: 029-221-010 & -020;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
Ianluary 14,20[12, at which time it reviewed and considered the staffreport and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, TIIEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19, Section l53ll - Accessory Structures Class ll(a), (b), (c) consists of constuction, or
placement of minor stuctures accessory to existing commercial, industial, or institutional facilities, including
but not limited to: (a) On premise signs, is hereby approved.
2. Said variance for sign height is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit *A'
attached hereto. Findings for such variance for sign height are ils set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
CI{AIRMAN
I, Joseph Boju6s , Secretary of dre Planuing Commission ofthe City of Burlingame, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was intoduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the planning Commission
held on the 146 dav of Januarv. 2002. bv the followins vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
1
SECRETARY
F,XIilBIT'IA''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and variance for sigu height.
1443lloward Avenue
effective January 23, 2002
that the addition of the freestanding sign on the primary frontage (floward Avenue) shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent and date stamped November 15, 2001
(sheets SK3 and SK4);
that the changeable copy on the freestanding sign shall not exceed 9.9 SF (5'-5" wide x l'-10" tall)
and shall contain letters or graphics urovable only by hand;
that interior illumination shall be limited to low level illumination consistrng of a single fluorescent
tube or equivalent; sign illumination shall be turned offby an automatic system during the hours
between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 editisc, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
I
2.
3
4.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLVED by the CITY COLTNCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
vMfora new freestanding sign at 1443 Howard Avenue. zoned R-3/C-1. United
Methodist Church of Burlinsame. propertv owner. APN: 029-221-010 & -020;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on January 14.
2002 . at which time said application was-@;
wHEREAS,thiSmatterwas@LtoCityCouncilandahearingthereonheldon
Februarv 20" 2002, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
1. On the basis ofthe Initial Study and the documents submiued and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19, Section 15311 - Accessory Structures Class 11(a), (b), (c) consists of construction, or
placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities,
including but not limited to: (a) On premise signs, is hereby approved.
2. Said variance for sign height is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such variance for sign height are as set forth in the minutes and recording of
said meeting.
3 . It is further directed that acertified copy of this resolution be recorded in the offrcial records
of the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr'that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the-204- day of February.
2002 and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
EXHIBIT ''A''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and variance for sign height.
1443 HOWARD AYENUE
effective FEBRUARY 20,2002
1
2.
3
4.
that the addition of the freestanding sign on the primary frontage (Howard Avenue) shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stampedNovember 15, 2001
(sheets SK3 and SK4);
that the changeable copy on the freestanding sign shall not exceed 9.9 SF (5'-5" wide x 1'-10" tall)
and shall contain letters or graphics movable only by hand;
that interior illumination shall be limited to low level illumination consisting of a single fluorescent
tube or equivalent; sign illumination shall be turned off by an automatic system during the hours
between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as alnended by the City of Burlingame.
].443 EOIiIARD AVENUE
Appeat of a Planning Commissi-on denial of
"ir'"ppfi"ation for variance for height of
a frllstanding sign at 1443 Howard Avenue'
zoned R-3/c-1. (APN: 029-221-010;020)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRTMBOSE ROAD
BUBLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) s58-7250
The City of Burlingame City Council
"rrtorrr"-"" the following public hearing on
We&resday, Eebruary 2Or-2992 at 7:00 P'U'
Chambers located
at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame'
California.
Mailed FebruarY 8, 2002
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250
Margaret
City Planner
PU
PUBLIC HEAHING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
I Primrose Road,
limited to
blic hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
c&. {. t F{"}${g&
(Please refer to other side)
CE
-+
Received after packet
prepared.
Item No. 5c
Hrg.212012002
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: February 13,2002
TO:Mayor and Council
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City A
RE Height of Signage in Districts
[United Methodist Church, 1401 Howard Avenue]
A key element of the United Methodist Church's application for a variance from the Sign Code is
that the height allowed is insufficient for viewing above vehicles that may be parked on the property
frontage. If the Council believes that to be the case, then the height of signage throughout the R-3
and R-4 Districts should be changed in the Sign Code to the necessary height.
/
STATF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATf
50-,
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AI\ID CITY COI]NCIL St,BIt[ITlTI)
DATE:JAIYUARY 15.2001
APPROVEI)
trROM:CITY PLANNER
suBJEcr: APPEAL OX'Tm PLANI\ilNG COMMISSION'S DENIAL WIIEOUT PREJUDICE ON A
AN APPLICATION FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT THE SERVICE
BAYS OF AN EXISTING GAS STATION TO A MIM.MART AT II47 ROLLINS RON),
ZONED C.1.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should hold a public hearing including the conditions considered by the Planning Commission
and take action. Action alternatives include:
- approval ofthe applicant's request with appropriate conditions; or
- denial of the applicant's request; or
- because this was a denial without prejudice by the Commissiorl the matter can be referred back
to the Planning Commission for the applicant to pursue Commission's pervious direction and/or
additional Council direction.
The reasons for any action by Council should be cleady stated forthe record. The Action Alternatives sheet at
the end ofthe staffreport includes the criteria for a conditional use permit.
Conditions of Appnoval Considered by the Planning Commission
I. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date
stamped fune 1, 2AO1, site plan, floor plarl and elevations with a mini-mart/sales area of 1,695 SF
including the gas station cashieq an 80 SF office and an 84 SF public restroom;
2. that any changes in operatiorL type of product sold or floor area" shall be brought to the Burlingame
Planning Commission for approval,'
3. that no alcoholic bever4ges shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except hot beverages)
be prepared on or sold from the site;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Offrcial's January 16,2OOl memos shall be
met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on the premises;
BY
BY
AWEAL OF THE PI^/WNING COMMISSION'S DETIIAL WITHOUT PREIWICE ON A AN APPI.ICANON FOR A
CONDINONAL WE PERMIT NO CONWRT TIIE SERWCE BAYS OFAN DilSTING GAS STANON TOA MINI-MART
ATII4TROLLINSROAD,ZONil)GI- Iouuy 23,2(M2
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-mart, and to be
limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
7. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash receptacles on-site
one ofwhich will be placed by the doortothe mini-mart sales area;
8. that the applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent street frontages for 50 feet in either
- direction and keep them clean and free of debris and litter associated with the mini-mart; and
g. thatthe project shall meet all the requirements ofthe CaliforniaBuilding and Uniform Fire Codes,
1998 editioq as amended by the City ofBurlingame.
Planning Commission Action
Attheir meeting on December l0.,z}Al,the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 64-l (C'
Osterling absent) to deny without prejudice the application to convert the service bays of the gas station at
1147 Rollins Road to a 1,695 SF mini mart. In their action the Commissionss noted: that comparing this
mini-mart to others in the city does not work because of its location at a diffrcult intersection and freeway on
ramp; the estimated customer numbers may be way offsince the nearby 7-l I is Sff/olarger but has 6Wo
morl customers than being projected here; during a site visit at7-11 all q.rstomers came from the north
passing by this gas statioq people will stop at gas station for a hot sandwich at lunch and using the ATM and
UV p* the 7-11, if there were 700-900 customers at the gas station location it would be a nightmare at this
intersection; have issue with comparative table (with other mini-marts) because it did not state size of sales
area may have included restrooms and storagg parking OK since 7-11 has 10 parking spaces and the gas
station will have 12 ctrstomer spaces, new signal at intersection makes it safer than before for gas station
customers to re-enterthe roadway; feel customers will prefer 7-11 because they sell alcoholic beverages;
comparative table may not be perfect but indicates thatthere will be 250 more customers than noted by the
applicant in his zubmittal here with the mini-mart at this location; need a more accurate trip generation study
rot convinced there will be as few more customers as the applicant and trafEc study indicates; do not think
the new signal has resolved the access problem for this site; applicant could provide information on the
number ofiterns to be sold with skew numbers, if this is fewer than 7-11 then 7-l I will be a better choice for
customerg need to have this information before can make a decision; concerned that this will become another
7-, i .rith volume of customers exceeding 600 a day, since the location of the gas station is difficult and
dangerous, cannot zupport-
A motion to deny was revised to denial without prejudice in order to grve the applicant the opportunity to
provide the additional information that Commission had indicated they would need to make a decision. A
denial without prejudice gives an applicant 90 days to return to the Commission with additional information or
a revised projec{. It also is a final action so allows the applicant to appeal the decision to the City Council if
they wish.
Commission daermined that the applicant should be allowed to come back with a revised application
including the following:
- address the traffic and customer issues raised with a new, valid study;
- prefare a market study Oased on this location) of new customers and diverted customers from 7-l I
(should be done by a firm that deals in market studies forthis type ofbusiness and in such a way
that market resuhs can be translated into traffic impacts);
- sales area ofthis proposed mini-mart should be compared to sales areas and volumes of otlrer
mini-marts owned by this applicant; and
BACT(GROII}ID:
The applicant/property owrcr, Grs Greco, is proposing to convert the three service bays at the gas station at
I147 iiollin, Iio"d, into a 1695 SF mini-mart which would also include take-out food service and an ATM
machine. A mini-mart where food is prepared or rapidly pre,pared (heated) for conzumption offthe premises
is considered a take-out food servic". (CS 2S.f 6.030 (13)). Because the minimart was not included as a part
ofthe original gas station the change to this use is considered an intensification of use on the site requiring a
conditional use permit (CS 25.74.0201. fresently the gas station has two gas islands with a total of four gas
pumps and a t,OgS Sf structure that contains three service bayg a small office and bathrooms. This
application requires the following conditional use permits:
- to intensiS the use at a gasoline service station (remove three service bays and convert the area to a
1,695 SF retail saleg mini-mart and retain four gasoline pumps);
- take out food sales for the sale and processing/preparation of food on site.
The proposed mini-mart would include ti.c Sale of prepackaged snacks, candy, gum, cigaretteq sod4 and hot
beverages. There would also be self-service coffee and soda machines- Frozen foods would be sold which
could ie prepared (heated) on site for immediate conzumptioq therefore the take otrt food service permit
requirement. fn" "ppti*rt wishes to retain the existing cash-only ATM machine located in the office area and
.or" it to the mini-mart area. The exterior changes proposed include the installation of a new aluminum
storefront systerq with a pass through drawer, new stucco finish on all sides, and a new door along the
exterior elevation. No ctranges are proposed to the gasoline pumping area (i.e. islandg canopy). This
application was zubmitted before commercial design rwiew was established, so it was not zubject to
evaluation against those criteria.
After reviewing and discussing city policy, the applicant has stated he would not sell alcoholic beverages at
this site. (see condition of approval 3) No sale of alcoholic beverages at a gas stdion mini-mart is consistent
with all other mnditional use permits for gas station mini-marts issred by the city. (See Planning Commission
StaffReport December 10, 2001 attached.)
There are 19 nonconformrng parking spaces on the site at this time. They are nonconforming in tlre se,nse that
they don't meet current pa.ting dimensilrn standards. With the conversion ofthe serrrice bays the parking area
wili be re-striped to provide for ll parking spaces which meet current code dimensions including one
disabled van accessible space. One space, number I onthe plans, has a narrowed access which does not
conform to current parking dimensions because the raised cr,rrb for the planter box encroaches into the space.
No variance is required since more on site parking is provided than is requird (12 parking spaces provided, 7
parking spaces requireAl. At a gas station two of the parking spaces would be required for employees
working on the sitg the remainder would be available to customers.
The applicant is proposing 24-hour operatio4 seven days a week for both gasoline sales and the mini-mart.
Therewould be one employee on-site at all times. A manager that oversees this site and three other gas
stations would spend two hours a day at the site and a book keeper would be on site for two hours a day. No
change in the number of employees is expected in the next five years orthereafter. The applicant anticipates a
maximum of 9 to l0 people on site at any one time including employees and customers. Tanker truck
deliveries are made 6the site every other day during ofl peak hours, midnightto 6 am. Trucks enteroff
Cadillac Way and exit onto Rollins Road. The owners estimate two merchandise deliveries a week forthe
snack shop, uzually at noon time. These trucks would park on the south end ofthe site while making
deliveries.
a
APPEAL OF TIIE PUINMNG COMMISSION'S DENIAL WTMOW PREIWICE ON A AN APPUCATION FOR A
CONDINONAL USE PERWT TO CONVERT THE SMWCE BAYS OF AN E)(ISTING GAS STATION TO A MINI-AIART AT
1147 ROLUNSROAD, ZONEDC-\. Jaruary 23' 2002
- traffic study needs to use better sampling and be amplified'
History of Project Review
planning Commission reviewed this application at study on August 13,zC0l a1d expressed concern aboutthe
following itetrs: current number of customers, why the city tras its current policy about sellinq alcoholic
beveragJs at gasoline service stations and the iuration of that policy, staffzurvey of other mini;mart oper*ion
s at 24iour fasoline stations in the city, number of customers, parking providqd on site and police activity,
review location ofbathroom access, dJermine police c,oncerns and activity at7-ll and Chewon Station at
Broadway, and number of daily customers at7-t1. These issues were all addressed in the December 10, 2001
planning 6ommission StaffReport pages 24 attache/-. Atthe Septenrber lq 2001, action meetingthe
commisiion held a public hearing and iontinued this item until a traffic study could be completed' Tlre traffrc
report: Memo fromlohn wilsorirraffic Engineer t9 Mr. Gus Greco, dated october 22,zoaL is also included
in the Planning Commission StaffReport ofDecember 10, 2001 attached '
APPEAL OF THE PIANMNG COMMISSON'S DENIAL WIMOW PREIUDICE ON A AN APPLICANON FOR A
CONDITIONALUSEPERMITTOCONVMTMESERWCEBAYSOFANE)ilSITNGG'4SSTANONTOAMNI-}VIART AT
t 147 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED C-1' Jarruary 23' 2U)2
ATTACHMENTS:
Action Alternatives and Criteria for a Conditional Use Permit
Momoe letterto Gus Greco, January 8, 2001, setting appeal
Mark Hudak letter to Monroe, December 16,2001, requesting appeal
Planning Commission Minutes, December 10, 2001
Planning Commission StaffReport, December 10, z}}l,with attachments
pictures-of applicant,s other gas station mini-marts, 90 El Camino Real, San Carlos and ofthe proposed site at
1147 Rollins Road, Burlingame
Resolution
Notice of Appeal Hearing mailed January 11,2A02
i
!
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CONDITIONAL USE AND TAKE.OUT APPLICATION
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
conditional use and take-out permit to convert tlree service bays to a mini-mart at an existing gasoline
station at 1147 Rollins Road. zoned C-1. Clover Trust. prope4v owners. APN: 026-231-120;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on December 10.
200I at which time said application was denied;
WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council and a hearing thereon held on February
20. 2002, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
1. On the basis ofthe Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 1 5303 - Class I- the operation repair, maintenance,or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previousiy existing
including but not limited to (a) interior or exterior alternations involving such things as interior partitions,
plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
2. Said conditional use and take-out permits are approved, subject to the conditions set forth inExhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permits ur" u, set forth in the minutes and
recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, city clerk of the city of Burlingame, do hereby certifu
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held op th" 20fr
2002. and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:i
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
that the foregoing
day of February.
CITY CLERK
--a
EXHIBIT'IA''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use and take-out permits.
1147 ROLLINS ROAD
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 20, 2OO2
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped June L, 2001, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a
mini-mart/sales area of 1,695 SF including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office and
an 84 SF public restroom;
2. that any changes in operation, type of product sold or floor area, shall be brought to the
Burlingame Planning Commission for approval,.
3. that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except
hot beverages) be prepared on or sold from the site;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official's January 16,2OOI
memos shall be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on
the premises;
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-
mart, and to be limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
7. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash
receptacles on-site one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
8. that the applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent street frontages for 50
feet in either direction and keep them clean and free of debris and litter associated with
the mini-mart; and
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CONDITIONAL USE AND TAKE-OUT APPLICATION
RESOLVED by the CITY COLINCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
conditional use and take-out permit to convert three service bays to a mini-mart at an existing gasoline
station c-1 Clover 231-l
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on December 10.
2001 at which time said application was denied;
WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council and a hearing thereon held on February
20.2002, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that:
l. On the basis ofthe Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class I- the operation repair, -uirt"r*"",or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing
including but not limited to (a) interior or exterior alternations involving such things as interior partitions,
plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
2. Said conditional use and take-out permits are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permits are as set forth in the minutes and
recording of said meeting.
3 ' It is fuither directed that acertified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certi$r that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2}ih day of Febirary.
2002. and adopted thereafter by the following vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COL]NCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO.
EXHIBIT ''A''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use and take-out permits.
1147 ROLLINS ROAD
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 20, 2OO2
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped June 1 ,200L, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a
mini-mart/sales area of 1,695 SF including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office and
an 84 SF public restroom;
2. that any changes in operation, type ofproduct sold or floor area, shall be brought to the
Burlingame Planning Commission for approval,.
3. that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except
hot beverages) be prepared on or sold from the site;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official's January 16,2OOl
memos shall be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on
the premises;
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-
mart, and to be limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
7. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash
receptacles on-site one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
8. that the applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent street frontages for 50
feet in either direction and keep them clean and free of debris and litter associated with
the mini-mart; and
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
PIANNINGDEPARTMENT
CITYIIAI.I 5OI PRMROSE ROAD
BUruI.IG/Ui{E, CALIFORNIA 9,!0t0-3f?
January 2820fl2
CORRECTED COPY
GUS GRECO
I I47 ROLLINS ROAD
BTJRLINGAME CA 94OIO
Dear Mr. Greco,
At the city council meeting ofJanuary z4,2o02,the council rescheduled
your appeal hearing on your project at I 147 Rollins Road, znnedc- I . This
application was to allow the conversion of service bays to a mini-mart at anexisting gas station. The public hearing will be
-held
on wednesday,
February 20r2002 at7:00 p.m. in the council chambers, 501 primrose
Road, Burlingame, CA.
The City of Burlingame
we look forward to seeing you there to present your oroject. please call
me if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
il'-^tug
TEIr (6$)55&7250
FA)C (650)69G3790
Monroe
City Planner
CAK\S
I l4TROLLrcsch
Clover Tnrsq property owner
Mark D Hudak
City Clerk
c.
CARR, MCCLELLAN,INGERSoLL, THoMPSoN & HoRN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
216 PARK ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 5I3
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94OI I-O5I 3MARKD. HUDAK
mhudak@cmithlaw.com
TELEPHONE (650) 342-9600
FACSIMILE (650) 342-7685
www'cmithlawcom
January 15,2002
Margaret Monroe
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 1147 Rollins Road
DearMeg:
Thank you for your letter regarding the hearing on the appeal for the project at ll47
California Drive. Unfortunately, we have developed a scheduling conflict foi lanuary 23,2002
and would ask that the hearing be continued to the next council meeting.
Thank you for your continuing assistance.
Mark D. Hudak
MDH:ljs
cc: Clients
2 I 970.00001 \BGr r3l\l 1277 2t.t
LlLT l02
Because of the press of business
on the February 4, 2002,'Council.
Agenda, this item should be setfor the February 20, 2AO2 Agenda.
lf::,ry,
'tt^uir,i?'r,
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
1L47 ROI^T.INS ROAD
Appeal of a Planning Commission denial of
an application for a conditional use
permit to convert an existing gas station
repair shop to a mini-mart at 1147 Rollins
Road, zoned C-1. (APN: O26-23L-L2O)
The City of Burlingame City Council
announces the following public hearing on
Wednesdav,Februarlr 20,2OO2 at 7:OO P.M.
in the City Hal1 Council Chambers locatedat 501 Primrose Road, Burlj-ngame,
California.
Mailed Eebruary 8, 2002
(PLease refer to other side)
A copy ofthe
to the nleeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
: .'
Property
tenants
558-7250
Margaret
City Planner
PU
(Please refer to other side)
CE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
or in written
I
-I
1147 Rollins Road
ACTION ALTERNATIVES
1. City council may vote in favor of an applicant's request. Ifthe action is a
variance, use permit, hillside area construction permit, fence exceptioq sign
exception or exception to the antenna ordinance, the Council must make findings
as required by the code. Findings must be particular to the given properties and
request. Actions on use permits should be by resolution. A majority of the
Council members seated during the public hearing must agree in order to pass an
afiirmative motion.
2. City Council may deny an applicant's request. The reasons for denial should be
clearly stated forthe record.
3. City Counci! rnay deny a request without prejudice. This action should be used
when the application made to the City Council is not the same as that heard by the
Planning Commission; when a Planning Commission action has been justifiably,
with clear directioq denied without prejudice; or when the proposed project raises
questions or issues on which the Council would like additional information or
additional design work before acting on the project. Direction about additional
information required to be given to stafi, applicant and Planning
Commission/City Council for the further consideration should be made very clear.
Council should also direct whether any subsequent hearing should be held before
the City Council or the Planning Commission.
REQUIREMENTS FOR A COITDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CS 25.52.020)s
(a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience;
(b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with
the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title;
(c) The planning commission may impose such reasonable conditions or
restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes ofthis title and to
assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass,
bulk and character ofexisting and potential uses on adjoining properties.
atw
CITY OF BT]RLINGAME
Plaming Dcparrrrcnt
City Hall -5Ol PrircRqd
Burlingre, C.Iifmia 94O1G3997 Tel. (650) 55&7200
January 8,2002
Gus Greco
1147 Rollins Road
Burlingame CA 94010
Dear Mr Greco,
At the city council meeting of January 7,2002,the Council scheduled an appeal
hearing on your project at I 147 Rollins Road, zoneac-I. This application was to
allow the conversion of service bays to a mini-mart at an existing gas station. A
public hearing will be held on wednesday, January zj,2002 ati:oop.m. in the
Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA.
we look forward to seeing you there to present your pdect. please call me if you
have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
smg
I l4TROIl.acc
Clover Trust, property orimer
Mark D Hudak
City Clerk
c.
frlmgdfiu*-
I 4\q
MARKD. H[JDAK
rrhudak@onifihw.com
CARR, McCrerleN, INcrnsoLL, THoMpsoN & HoRN
PROFESSIONAL CORFORATION
ATTORNEYS AT I,J,W
216 PARK ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 5I3
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9.IOI I -O5I 3
Deember 16,2001
TELEFI{ONE (650) 342-9600
FACSIMILE (650) 342-7685
www.cmithlaw.com
UONONABLB UAYOR AND CITY
COTINCIL:
A}I APPEAL EEARXNGI::SETXIIiD .
BE SET FOR TEE JANTIARY 23,
2OO2:TCOUNGIL }IBETIHG FOR
1147 ROLLTNS ROAD.
AIIN UUSSO, CITY CTERK
Meg Monroe
Planning Director
Cityof Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingarne, CA 94010
Re: 1147 R;nins Road
DearMeg:
Our olfice represents Mr. and lv{rs. Gus Greco, the owners of the service station at ll47
Rollins Road. We are appealing the decision of the Planning Commission to deny the
application for a conditional use permit for this property on becember 10, 2001. i understand
that, at its January 7 mceting, the City Council will set a date for the hearing of this appeal. As Iwill not be attending that meeting, I would appreciate it if you worrld let mJknow tne hearing
date set by the Council.
I am enclosing my fimr's check in the amount of $250.00 for the appeal fee.
Thanks to you and your stafffor your continuing assistance in processing this application-
Mark D. Hudak
MDH:ljs
cc: Clients
2ryr0-omolBclrBl\l 125182. I
i
RECEIVED
DEC 1 e 2001
'''r'rf,lntfi8'd.l8+Y'
,/ ,)ry
City of Burlingame P lanning C ommiss ion Minutes December 10,2001
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the
conditions of the City Engineer's, City Recycling Specialist's, and the Chief Building Official's May 7,
2001, memos shall be met;4) thatthe dimensions ofthe proposed detached shall be 2l'-0" x2l'-0";
5) that the 4 existing redwood rear right comer of the the I existing Baytree at the
left side ofthe property shall afterconstruction; 6)that no or other permanent structure shall be
erectedinthe 5'-0"easement located atthe property; 7) that the project shall comply
with the proposed and construction recently approved by the City Council;
and 8) that the shall meet all the of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code,1998 as amended by the Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Discussion on the motion: in
from the original
Vice Chair for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a3-2-l-l
(Crs. Boju6s dissenting, c. Vistica abstaining, c. osterling absent). Appeal procedures were
advised.concluded at 8:20 p.m..
1147 ROLLINS ROAD - ZOI\IED C.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDMONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONVERT AN EXTSTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI-MART (GUS GRECO,
APPLICANT; H.P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLoVER TRUST PROPERTY
OWNER)(I2 NOTICED)PLANNER:
Reference staff report , 12.10.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: were the traffic
numbers used to project trips for a mini-mart at this location averages taken from another source or counts
bases on this particular location; the numbers were based on mini-mart trip generation from a standard
source; the numbers show an increase of 6Yoof trips with the addition ofa mini-mar! were these gas stations
the same size; it is hard to tell since the increase is based on the sum of a number of site rp""ifi" traffrc
counts; in one submittal it notes that the County Health Department has approved this use, what does that
mean; the applicant should address this. Is it possible to have a cash only ATM? Yes. There seems to be a
problem with the numbering of the on-site parking spaces on the plans. Access to and from this site is
awkward, given the intersection, has the applicant discussed redevelopment ofthe entire site to improve the
use of this site relative to the signalized intersection. This question was directed to the applicani. There
were no further questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney, 216 Park Road, representing the
property owners Gus and Gladys Greco, noted that the applicant owns two or three other simiiar gas stations
on the Peninsula; which they have converted to mini-marts since this application was submitted the
applicant has re-evaluated the proposed operation based on previous "o**t, made by the Commission,including not seJling alcoholic beverages; they have found-that it is hard to find qualihed mechanics to
support the service part ofthe gas station business, this is an ideal location for a gas station with mini-mart
because of its proximity to the freeway; they hired John Wilson to do a traffic impact study and worked on
resolving the study parameters with the Engineering Departrnent, the hip generatiin was based on actual gas
sales from the site and adjusted by the increase in trips as documentra ty the San Diego Association of
Govemment trip generation studies for mini-marts, these indicate that there would be 15 more customerswith a mini-mart on the site, equival ent of 26 individual trips (13 in and out); feel that adding a mini-martwill not generate a lot more customers but will cause the existing customers to spend more moiey when they
stop for gas; they have had an ATM that only dispenses cash on the site for several years; concerned about
-6-
the size of the house was reduced by oSly aminor amoun! 300 SF,
,/
ft,.
CATT{F'RINI]
City of Burlingame Planning Commiss ion Minutes December 10,2001
the conditionwhichprohibits amicrowave ovento heatupfood, thinkissueoffoodestablishment is covered
by not allowing tables and chairs for customers to use; the Health Department review referred to is that they
have reviewed the applicant's proposal to serve food and approved it pending city approval of the use; the
ingress and egress at the intersection has changed with the new signal, people are using Cadillac Way more,
don't feel that one more customer an hour will have a big impact on the intersection, the 11.affic consultant
did not feel that an access study was necessary; applicant does not think that this will become a 7-ll,
because ofthenumberofexisting gas sales, T-l I sells alcoholic beverages whichattracts customers and in
the San Diego studies the size of the mini-mart did not seem to be a factor in trip generation, the key was
pass by traffrc.
Commissioner noted that this mini-mart is bigger than any of the others in the city at this time. Applicant
noted that the Chewon station sells twice as much gas as the Union 76 station so would have more
customers. Commissioner asked if this particular location was factored into the trip generation numbers.Applicant did not know. Commissioner asked if there were any hazardous wastes on the site; applicant
noted that when the tanks were replaced the site was cleaned up, they will not just redo the fioor of theservice bays, they will replace it for compliance with Coun y requirements. Commissioner; do not
understand why the size of the mini-mart does notaffect the number of customers atkacted, couldinfomration about change in number of customers from your other sites after installation of mini-marts beprovided, where are the applicant's other stations; what about shift in customers from 7-l I to this site;
applicant noted that they did not recall being asked to count customer levels at the 7-l l and none of their
other sites are accessed offa freeway, they are all along El Camino Real. Commissioner clarified that the1695 SF area for the mini-mart included the storage area and rest rooms; yes. There were no furthercomments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: the comparison with other mini-marts in the city does not work in this case, need toconsider the location; the nearby 7-1 I is S}%olargerbut has 6}O%more customers; did site visit at 7-l I andduring the 20 minutes all the customers came from the north passing by the gas station; people will stop atthe gas station for lunch, using the microwave, the ATM also increase, ih" ,.Loo, to stop, togetherdiverted
7- I I pass by traffic, ability to microwave lunch, ATM etc. could increase the number of custo*.o at the gasstation by 700-900 customers, have studied location and this could become a nightnare, difficultto support.Concemed about the comparative table because the sales area in each existiig mini-mart -uy rroihur.included rest rooms and storage,theT'll has l0 on site parking siraces and thisias station is providing 12so there will be no impact there, now there is a signal at the intersection customeri must use which improvesaccess over the present situation, customers will prefer 7-l I because they sell alcoholic beve*g"r, prlr"o"of microwave improves convenience. Concerned about traffic una i""r"^i"g the attraction to the gasstation' easier to stop here than 7-ll and it is more athactive, table may not 6e perfect comparison butanticipate there will be more than 250 customers here afterthe mini-martls built based on location; signalhas not resolved access problem, cannot support based on the numbers given, need a more accurate sfudy.Not opposed to the locationofthis mini-mart, butnotconvinced bythe Gm" datathattherewill bethis fewcustomers' One way to tell if this site will compete with 7-l I is
-for
the applicant to tell us the number ofitems with skew numbers, if it is fewer than 7-i I then 7-l l will be the Git", choice for a customer, thiscomparative information should be provided before a decision is made. Corr""*"a;;;;;ii
"r"u,"another 7-l l, with a volume of customers at the gas station which exceeds 600 a day, the traffic at the stationlocation is difficult and dangerous, cannot support.
c' Bojues moved by resolution to deny the conditional use permit and take-out permit to convert threeservice bays to a mini-mart at the existing gas station because of the negative impact on traffic at thislocation. The motion was seconded by C. icJigf,r*
-7-
Cily of htrlingame PlanningCommission Mirutes December 10,2001
Comment on the motion: CA Anderson pointed out for the new commissioners that a denial would not
allow the applicant to resubmit this same request for a mini-mart for a year, a denial without prejudice would
allow the applicant within 90 days to revise his reques! if he wished, and resubmit it for firttrer
consideration; given the choices think applicant should be allowed to address the taffic and customer issues
raised with a new valid study, also should include a market study of new customers and diverted 7-ll
customers based on this locatiorq the study should be done by a firm that deals in market studies for this tlpe
of business, the results of the study can then be translated in to taffrc impacts, so would suggest a denial
without prejudice. Would also ask that the sales area of this proposed mini-mart and sales volumes be
compared to the sales areas and volumes of the other mini-marts owned by this applicant. Traffic study
needs to be amplified as discussed and better sampling used. The maker and second of the motion agreed to
amend the motion to be a denial without prejudice.
ChairmanVisticacalled foravoice vote onthemotionto denywithoutprejudice the applicationforamini-
mart at I147 Rollins Road. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised, noting that the item was subject to appeal until the date of the next City Coiur ,il
meeting on January 7,2002. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m.
DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
8. 229 DWGIIT ROAI)ZOI\TED R-l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
LENGTI{ AND TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COVERED PARKINGPERMIT FOR
SPACES FORAFIRST STORY ADDITION (JOHN MAMSCALCO, APPLICANT A}.{D
ARCHITECT; RICK ESCOBA&OWNER) ( NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA
Z:t Lewit briefly presented the project There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public
He noted that the addition was designed to
garage must be removed because ofthe first
similar length on the property to the left. The will be used for storage of yard tool;;rnd
xI.
possibly a boat in
The Commission the necessity of the skylights on the elevation and if they would betinted; why did the to use a shed dormer; is the change materials from stucco onthe sideelevations to siding at the rear intentional. The applicant responded that skylights are needed because of
the high ceiling height in the living room and while untinted, they have automatic shades; the sheddormerwas used to create Iivable space in the proposed loft without the single-story appearance ofthe house; and the change in exterior material was intentional because at the side elevation
matches the existing house and the siding at the rear elevation is in keeping an outdoordesign.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C' Keighran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisionshave been made and plan checked:
o The gtrage should have a barge rafter extended from the roof to make it appear symmetrical;
-8-
future.
John Maniscalco, architect,
Theexisting
Previous Use:
Proposed Use:
Allowable Use:
Gity of Burlingame
Conditional Use Permit and Take-Out Permit to Convert Service Bays to
a Mini-Mart at an Existing Gas Station
Address: 1147 Rollins Road Meeting Date: l2/l}l0l
Request: Conditional Use Permit and Take-Out Permit to Convert Three Service Bays to aMini-Mart at an
existing gasoline service station at1147 Rollins Road, zoned c-l (c.s. 25.36.030 (3) and (13) and 25.74.020).
Applicant: Gus Greco ApN: 026_231_120
Property Owner: Clover Trust
Lot Area: 14,900 SFl0.26 Acres
General PIan: Service & Special Sales Commercial Zoning: C_l
Adj acent Development: Restarrrant, Apartments, Auto Sales
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class I- the operation repair,
maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or private skuctures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existingtcluding
but not limited to (a) interior or exterior alternations involving such things as interior partitions, pt,IrUing, ard
electrical conveyances.
Gasoline Service Station with three Service Bays
Gasoline Service Station with mini-mart (addition of 3 on-site parking spaces)
Gasoline service Station subject to obtaining conditional use.
Background: This proposal was before the Planning Commission as a study item on August l3,2ool and then
as an action item on Septernber 10, 2001. Both of these hearings are summarized below, utorg with the project
srmrmary, this summary is based on the current proposal.
Project Summary Q2llDlDl)z The applicant/owner of the existing gasoline service station at ll47 Rollins Roadis requesting a conditional use permit for the intensification of a gasoline service station and for take-out foodservice to convert three existing service bays to a mini-mart. A mini-mart where food is prepared or rapidlyprepared for consumption offthe premises is considered a take-out food service and requires conditional useapproval in the C-l zoning distric! C.S. 25.36.030(13). The mini-mart was not part of the originat senrice stationso it is considered an intensification of the gas station use which also requires a conditional us=e permit in the C-lzoning district C.S- 25.74.020. The service station site currently has two islands with a total of four gasolinepumps and a 1,695 SF strucfure that contains three service bays, a small office and bathrooms.
The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building and convert the three service bays to a mini-mart withtake-out food sales- The mini-mart includes sale ofprepackaged snacks, candy, gum, cigarettes, soda, and hotbeverages. There would also be a self-service coffee and sodamachine. n " upp-rir*t is proposing to sell frozenfoods and provide a microwave to allow on-site food preparation (heating).'rn" exterior changes proposedinclude the installation of a new aluminum storefront ryrt"rn, with a pass-througr, drawer, new sfucco finish onall sides, and a new door along the exterior elevation. There are no.h*g., proposed to the gasoline pumpingarea (i.e. islands, canopy). i
Item #
Action
Conditional Use and Take-Out Permit I 147 Rollins Road
The existing on-site parking area has 19 parking spaces; however the spaces do not meet current code dimension
requirements. As part of this proposal the parking area would be re-shiped to meet current parking space
dimension requirements; and 12 on-site parking spaces would be provided, one ofwhich would be handicap van
accessible. A gasoline service station is required to provide at least two on-site parking spaces for employees.
In addition to the two employee spaces, one parking space is required per 400 SF ofretail space and one space
is required per 300 SF ofoffice space. Based on these standards, 7 parking spaces are required for the proposed
use, and the applicant is proposing to provide 12 spaces.
Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd.
Use:
The new mini-mart and gasoline station would be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The applicant is
proposing to have one full-time employee (cashier) on-site at all times. There would be three shifts, 6:00 a.m.-
2:00 p.m., 2:00 p.m.-I0:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.. There is one manager that oversees this site and
three other gas stations along the Peninsula. This manager usually spends about two hours a day at each location.
There is also a book keeper that would be on-site for two hours in the moming or mid-aftemoon during theweek. The number of employees is expected to remain the same ir t\e next two to Iive years. There are
approximately 312 customers estimated to visit the site each day. There are expected to be a maximum of 9 to
10 people on-site at any one time, including owner, employees and customers.
Tanker trucks deliver gasoline to the site every other day during non-peak hours, between midnight and 6:00
a.m.. The trucks enter the site on Cadillac Way, and exit onto Rollins Road. Although truck delivery routes and
path of travel may vary depending on the driver, the trucks usually head north on Highway l0l after the
deliveries to 1147 Rollins Road. There are estimated to be two merchandise deliveries pi week for the snack
shop, usually during the noontime hours. These trucks would park on the south endof the property when
delivering merchandise.
Parking
*Gasoline Station
withMini-Mart
12 spaces
Gasoline Service
Station
l9 spaces
(non-conforming
dimensions)
Conditional Use Permit Req,d for
Take-Out Food Sales and
In.srr;ification of a Gasoline Station
7 spaces-
(At least 2 parking spaces for
employees shall be provided on the
property plus I space per 400 SF of
retail, and I space per 300 SF of
office)* Conditional Use Permit and Take-out Permit to Convert Three Service Bays to a Snack Shop at an existinggasoline service station
This project meets all other zoning code requirements.
Augnst 13, 2001 Study Meeting: At the August 13, 2001 Plarming Commission study meeting, the Commissionhad the following concerns with the project. The applicant has submitted a written response date stamped August16,200l ' to address some of the Plarming Commission's comments, however most the questions were directed
2
a
Conditional Use and Take-Out Permit 1147 Rollins Road
to staff. Each concern expressed by the Commission is listed below with the response found under each item
in italics.
How many customers currently come to the site each day?
The applicant has stated that they cutently have about 250 customers per day during the week, and about
190 customers per day on the weekend.
Why does the City have its present policy about selling alcoholic beverages at gasoline service stations?;
When service stations first began addingfood marts to gasoline stations , the Planning Commission at that
time felt that allowing alcohol sales at gasoline stations would encourage drinking and driving, and
therefore a condition of approval prohibiting alcohol sales has always been included inipprovalsfoi snack
shops or mini-marts in coniunction with gasoline stations. The condition prohibtting ifcohot siles
appears as a part of the approval for the following three service stations with snack shops/mini-marts
conditional (special) use permits
Chevron 1I0l Broadway Approved-October 15, lgg5Texaco 601 california Dr. Approved- september 12, lgg4Chevron 260 El Camino Real Approved - July 8, 1996
Can staffprovide information on other mini-mart operations at2$-howgasoline station in the City as well
as for the 7-11 south of the subject property, including size, number of customers, amount of parking
provided, number of employees, and police activity;
* Police Activity listed above includes thefollowing lypes of calls: theft,suspicious persons,disturbing thepeace, drunk in public, mentally ill,carrying a concealed weapon, stolen vehicle,
o
3
Address Bus.
Name
,SF Hours Customers
per day
#
empl
Prking
spaces
Police
activity
over last
2 years
(# of
calls)*
975 Rolltns Rd.7-t I 2,500 24 1,500 2 10 18
601 Califurnia Dr.Texaco 174 6:30 am-9:30 pm M-F
7am-8 pm Sat
9am-6pmSun
100 weelcday
150 weekend
j 6 5
l !!1 Broadway Chevron r00 24 650 2 2 )a260 El Camino Chevron 247 24 400 5 6 19
barglary.assault, robbery and
a
1,1ZA..:;,r:
::::l .i:r ,, ': : 'l.
'trti)e-:Affi
,wieke4$
Conditional Use and Take-Out Permit 1147 Rollins Road
Can the applicant reconsiderthe interior layout with the bathroom opening into the mini-mart, may be a
health problem, and would be unsightly to shoppers;
The applicant has stated that the San Mateo County Health Department has requested that that public
bathrooms access be through the mini-mart, rather than directlyfrom the outside.
a Compare the police concerns and activity with the Chewon Station at Broadway and 7-l l; and
The applicant has stated that thqt have owned the station at I147 Rollins Road since 1990 and have had
two robberies. The Broadway Chevron had nuo police calls in the last two years, both were regarding
stolen vehicles. The 7-11 store at 975 Rotlins Road hod 18 calls in the last two years. Three ofwhlch were
robbertes, the remaining incidents include disturbing the peace, drunk in puilic, assault, stolen vehicle,
mentally ill person and petty theft.
o How many customers visit 7-11 daily, and what are the peak times of day for business.
There are approximately 1,500 to 1,600 customers per day at theT-t I stoie ot g75 Roltins Road. The peak
time of dayfor business is between 6:00 a-m. - 8:00 a.m.-
September 10' 2001 Action Meeting: At the September 10, 2001 Planning Commission action meeting, theCommission voted to continue this project until a taffic study could be completed. The following concems werealso expressed at that meeting:
' The 7-11 customers pass this site, and if the proposed business diverts those customers it would have a bigimpact on the intersection and traffic would back up onto Broadway, would increase haffic at an alreadytroubled intersection;
o Some Commissioners expressed concern with the sale of alcoholic beverages and the microwaves to enablethe sales of hot food, while others stated that they had no problem with th;ATM and microwave since theyare already active on the site;
o How was the number of customers per day determined;o If the applicant states that the number of customers would not increase as a result ofthis proposal then whydo it; and
' Allowing the sale of alcoholic beverages as part of this proposal would be a change to City policy.
The applicant has submitted a written response date stamped october 25, 2001to address the planning
Commission's comments. In this response the applicant notes that he is withdrawing his request for alcohol salesas part of this proposal. The applicant is requesting that condition number 5, which protibit, an ATM on-sitebe removed, and a portion of condition number 3, prohibiting hot food from being prepared on or sold from thesite, be removed.
The traffic study looked at the existing number of daily trips to and from the site to establish a base line. Thenthe haffic engineer used the San Diego Association of Governments (sANDAG) trip generation characteristicsto determine the increase in the number of hips when a mini-mart is added to a ias station. The percentage ofdaily traffic during the AM and pM peak periods are also from sANDAG studies.
4
a
Conditional Use and Take-Out Permit 1147 Rollins Road
The number of trips is cut in half in order to determine the number of customers per day, since each customer
creates two trips, I in-bound and I out-bound trip. The traffic engineer determined the existing trip generation
rate (base level) by reviewing the annual fuel sales from the station, estimating the number of service bay
customers and the number employee trips. The annual sales were determined by using the industry standard of
an average sale of 15 gallons per customer, which translated to 306 sales transactions or vehicles (customers)
per day, (612 fuel trips per day-l inbound and I outbound). The station (with the three service bays) currently
generates approximately 634 trips, with 612 trips athibuted to fuel sales, 8 attributed to employee kips (4
employees working throughout a 24 hour period) and 14 trips attributed to the service bays (6 customers and I
mechanic). SANDAG numbers indicate a6.67% increase in trip generation rates for a gas station that adds a
mini-mart. This results in an increase of 40 trips per day,2 of these trips would be during the AM peak hours
and I trip would be during the PM peak hours. However, the removal of the three service bays would eliminate
14 trips per day. Therefore, the net number of new trips with the proposed mini-mart would be 26per day.
The City Engineer and Traf{ic Engineer reviewed this study and founC the methods used in the study to be
acceptable, and agreed with the conclusion that net increase in the number of trips per day is insignificant.
Staff Comments: See attached. Please note that this project was submitted on January 12,2OOl, before
Commercial Design Review came into effect (May 16, 2001). Staff would also note that todistinguish this use
from a (fast) food establishment a condition is included to prohibit the sale of hot food, except hlt beverages,
and on-site tables and chairs. In 1996 the Commission approved a take-out permit for 260E1 Camino Real, and
conditioned the approval to prohibit a microwave oven or other cooking element.
In order to prohibit this site from becoming a financial institution and to reduce traffic levels, a condition is
included which allows one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-mart, andto be limited to
cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities.
Staff would also like to note that the total number of customers per day has increased to 3l2from the originalnumber of 250 reported in the application. As stated above, the traffic engineer determined the existing tripgeneration rate (base level) by reviewing the annual fuel sales from the station, estimating the number of servicebay customers and the number employee trips, and come up with 634 t.ipi per day o, itzcustomers per day.The owner originally reported 250 customers per day.
Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use permit the planning Commissionmust find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.A20 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property orimprovements in the vicinity, and will not be dekimental to the public healt[ safety, g"rr;d welfare,or convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan
and the putposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessaryto secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the
5
Conditional Use Permit 1147 Rollins Road
aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action
should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated
for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
Conditions:
1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date
stamped June 1, 2001, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a mini-marUsales area of 1,695 SF
including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office and an 84 SF public restroom;
'2. that any changes in operation, tSpe of product sold or floor area, shall be brought to the Burlingame
Planning Commission for approval;
3. that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except hot beverages)
be prepared on or sold from the site;
4- that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official's January 16,ZOO1 memos shall
be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on the prernises;
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-mart, and to be
limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
7 - that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash receptacles on-site
one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
8. that the applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent sheet frontages for 50 feet in either
direction and keep them clean and free of debris and litter associated with the mini-mart; and
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City ofBurlingame.
Catherine Keylon
Planner
c Gus Greco, applicant & station owner
6
TO:
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 16,200L
-CITY
ENGINEER
CHTEF BI.IILDING OTTICIAL
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
trROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
Request for conditional use permit for intensification of an existing gas
station and take-out for conversion of a repair shop to retail sales atll4il Rollins Road, zoned C-l, APN : 026-231-120.
STAFF REVIBW BY MEETING ON: Tuesday, January 16,2A0l
Catherin/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/S ean 0 [ Date of Comments
ST]BJECT:
Sen
@ Gurr#r\-s CI+ t",\Ji (ta-.A
)
THANKS,
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 16,2001
TO:CITY
FROM:
-FIRE
MARSHAL
SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
Request for conditional use permit for intensification of an existing gas
station and take-out for conversion of a reparr shop to retail ,rt.Jrt
lL47 Rollins Road, zoned C-I, ApN: 026-231-120.
STAFF REVIEW By MEETING ON: Tuesday, January 16,2001
THANKS
Catherin/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean Date of Comments
f/r,. tt c) cee7e V usq *r/ ee<-u/z?q.ay.
. *tt Corrc>,+lL Cc>/e fe{ ut.e}n""& fo' * &-r" "tf
C*€.ca^h le ) occgvrnof L, // */./ /Y ' -.t oua e</*
e re' teq utrJ ,1,r:r*., Yhe- 5 e /.t g rea . froo
extls ;; ,ofu b- r4fu *e' 4*/l P/e".u '
*;ill^*:t lto,(a u'*/( ,s cme - ttru, t',* .resrA
SURIECT:
14
t/<
CUO
t,,
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 16, 200L
TO:
CIIIEF BTJILDING OFFICIAL
-FIRE
MARSHAL
SR. LANDSCAPEINSPECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER
St BIECT: Request for conditional use permit for intensification of an existing gas
. station and take-out for conversion of a repair shop to retail sales at
Ll47 Rollins Road, zoned C-l, APN:026-231-120.
STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Tuesday, January 16,2001
THANKS
Catherin/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean 6
Date of Comments
l /(^"" d /''a/Lc
??Lrtb7 f^
f "* t, c'ff- 7o'-/'u'"r M.,
r"7-o-t n-4 ,7 f,
, /_
a h-"/1il -r t (*
fc*rtz-t ^-,*./
,-4
-5 t4
Cily of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 10, 2001I
lf, ruz RoLLINS RoAD - zoi\tnD c-l - AppLrcATroN FoR coNDITIoNAL usE pERMrr roI CONVERT AN E)(ISTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MIM.MART (GUS GRECO,
APPLICANT; H.P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVERTRUST, PROPERTY
OWNER) (CONTINUED T'ROM AUGUST 27.MEETING)
Reference staff report, 9.10.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked does condition 3
mean that there could not be a microwave on the site for heating food? CP Monroe responded yes. There
were no further questions from the Commission.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Gus and Gladys Greco, property owners I 147 Rollins Road,
represented the project noting that they wanted to improve the appearance of the site and gave the
commission pictures of the remodel that they recently completed at their similar structure in San Carlos
which had a service bay area of about the same size; they indicated that they could not accept conditions 3
(no sale of alcoholic beverages and hot food) and 5 (no ATM on site). They felt that there was a big
difference between a restaurant enc', someone heating a sandwich to eat in their car; they now have an ATM
machirie it is built into the gas pumps and also they have a separate cash machine inside; theywill have an
alcohol license which only allows selling in bulk (six pack or bottle of wine) not open cont irrers or one can
at a time; the sale of alcohol is expected to be an important part of their future business profit; they do not
plan on having tables or chairs so can agree to that limitation. Commissioners asked irow the projected
number of customers was determined, noting that this is a busy intersection, recently signalized, and an
increase in traffic movements at this location is a concern; applicant noted that most gas customers come
from the south on Rollins Road and are entering into the complicated intersectiorr, noicrossing it to get to
the station; he noted the number of customers is based on their current volume and they do noI expect the
mini-mart to increase the number of customers at the gas station. The difference between the number of
customers at this station without a mini-mart and those with smaller mini-marts in the area wurs noted by
commission, in all cases the other stations had a larger number of customers; the 7-l I nearby had six times
as many customers with only a third more floor area. Commission noted that if the applicant's business
increased to a per square foot level of the 7 -ll , itcould add 900- I 000 vehicles to the intersection. Applicant
noted that he has not noted an increase in customers in his San Carlos location three weeks after opening
the mini-mart. There was discussion about the free standingATM on site, the applicant establishedthat it
was a cash only ATM, can not d;pt,sit checks. Regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages the applicant noted
that the liquor cooler automatically locked between 2 am and 6 am; employees would have to G 2l years orolder. Commission noted that based on the information in the statrreport to allow the sale of alcoholic
beverages at this mini-mart would be a change in city policy. Applicant noted he felt that the economic
return to the city and himself from the mini-mart would be greater than from the service business. Applicant
noted that Union 76 had done a study regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages at gas stations and
determined that people were as likely to drink and drive if they purchased the beverages at Safeway as they
were if they bought them at a gas station mini-mart. There were no further comments from the floor and thepublic hearing was closed.
Commission comment: have trouble supporting this request, on site visit noticed all the 7-l l customers
have to pass this site, ifthis business diverts those customlrs it will have a big impact on the intersection andtraffic will back up on to Broadway, increasing problems for the already trJuUtea traffic in this area; alsohave problems with the sale of alcoholic beverages and the microwavi to enable sales of hot food; thecustomer numbers and discussion raise questions, if expanding to 1700 SF of mini-mart and it will not
4
City of Burl ingame P lanning Commis sion Minutes September 10,2001
increase the number of customers; why do it; all other stations with mini-marts have more customers than
expected here; think city should not change its policy on the sale of alcoholic beverages from gas stations,
we should be consistent have prohibited at other service stations should do so here; feel thatthere is a strong
potential for added congestion at this difficult intersection, this is not a good location for this use; ATM and
microwave are there already so do not have a problem, but share the traffic concern, should continue this
item to have a proper study and evaluation of the accuracy of the trip generation numbers for 7-l l. CA
Anderson noted that ttrere were two procedural options: one was to continue the time and ask the applicant
to have a traffic study prepared so that the impacts could be better estimated; and the second was to deny the
appliceition . Commission noted that given the options it was better to offer the applicant the opportunity to
do a traffic study so the Commission would have a better understanding ofthe impact ofthe change in use.
C. Osterling moved that this project be continued until a haffic study could be completed to include the
issues identified in the discussion and as discussed with staff. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Comment on the motion: one commissioner noted that if undertaking a traffic study is considered by the
applicant to be too complex would be willing to consider a reduction of square footage in the mini-mart by
atleast 50o/o.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to continue the item until a traffic study could be
prepared and presented to the Commission. The motionpassed unaminously on a 6-0 voice vote. Since no
action was taken on the application the item is not appealable. This item concluded at 8:15 p.m.
IX. DESIGN STT]DY ITEMS
5. 1424 BERNAL - ZOI\TED R-l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST A}ID
SECOND STORY AND ANEW DETACHED GARAGE (ALFREDO REYES, STEWART
A}ID DESIGNER; JON AND KELLY MC GOVERN, PROPERTYASSOCI.ATES,
CP Monroe brieflypresented the description. There were no questions of staff.
Chaimran Vistica opened the public John Stewart, Stewart Associates, l35l Laurel Avenue, San
Carlos, applicant and architect, noted
Craftsman style ofthe existing house.
was closed.
this is the tpe of project he hkes to do, addition enhances the
other comments fromthe floor andthe public hearing
Commissioners wanted to complement the architect on plans, specifically sheet A-4, it distinctly shows
the existing versus proposed; overall
item on the consent calendar at a next
was seconded by C. Osterling.
the design is very C. Bojuds made a motion to place this
Planning meeting on September24,200l. This motion
Chairrran Vistica called for a vote on the motion to place on the consent calendar for the nextmeeting. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0. The planning
appealable. This item concluded at 8:20 p.m.
action is advisory and not
6. 750 WALNUT AVENT]E - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR
5
REVIEW AND SPECIAL
,r
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes August 27, 2001
ROAD - ZONED C.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO1147 ROLLINS ]
CONVERT AN E)(ISTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI-MART (GUS GRECO,
APPLICA}IT; H.P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVER TRUST, PROPERTY
OWNER)
This item was continued to the September 10, 2001, Regular Action Planning Commission Meeting.
X. DESIGN STUDY ITEMS
6. 1361 DE SOTO - ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW
TWO-STORY FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACIIED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU
APPLICA}IT AI{D DESIGNEB JOHN ANID CATHY GARAGOZZO/LARRYDESIGN & ENGR,
CP Monroe briefly the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the John Garagozzo, property owner, represented the project.
tisa Rothrook, 1355 De Soto,also spoke. The applicant noted that he had a family of six, he
similar to those in the San Mateo Park area" they used shutters andwanted to design a French county
belly band to break up the mass, along divided light windows, the foot print of the house is small and
compact the interior simple, the rooms
house four years ago; she like the
bedroom upstairs (left elevation) be
The neighbor noted that they added a second story on their
house and would only ask that the window in the second
to the right side of the chimney so that it would not line up
with the master bedroom window on her
comment period was closed.
There were no other comments from the floor. The public
Commissioner comment on the design:
There appears to be a problem with the scale on are the exterior doors 8 feet tall, no 7'-6";
The entrance of the house is over powered by the of the structure on each side of it;a
a
a Enty is wealg concrrned about the mass at the front of the
First floor plate can be 9 feet, second floor plate should be 8 feet,not noted clearly on the plans;
C. Boju6s noted that the project was almost there, he then moved to this project on the consent
calendar when the items identified had been addressed. The motion was C. Auran. The motion
to place this project on the consent calendar when all the changes have been waspassed ona40-2
(Cers. Luzuriaga and Osterling absent). The commission's action is advisory and
item concluded at 9:00 p.m.
8
is no appeal. This
II.
IIr.
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
August 27,2001
Council Chambers
L CALLTO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the August 27 , 20ol regular meeting of the planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL Present Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica,
Absent: Commissioners Osterling and Luzttiaga
StaffPresent city Planner, Margaret Monroe; planner, Ruben Hurin; city
Attorney, Larry Anderson; Civil Engineer, Donald Chang
MIIIUTES Thv .ninutes of the August 13, 2001 meeting regular of the planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
APPROVAL Of,' AGENDA Because there was no quorum for two items, item ld, 1440 Chapin Avenue,
was removed from the agenda and the design review study item at 1323
Carlos Avenue will be discussed by a subcommittee of the commission
rv.
seated.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Gus Greco, applicant for the conditional use permit
VI. STUDY ITEMS
\rII.
Road asked that his item be deferred to the next
meeting whenthere would be a full commission. The Chairman noted that
the frrll commission was currently six members and at least five were
expected to attend the next meeting. The applicant noted that five would be
fine and staffwas directed to place this item on the september 10,2001,
agenda for action.
Alvin Potter, attomey representing the property owner at 1709 Easton Drive
clarified that public testimony would be taken on this item on the action
calendartonight. It was confirmed by the chairman. There were no ftrther
comments from the floor. This item concludedatT:l2p.m.
There were no Study Items for review.
ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Itums on the corsent calendq oe considered to be routine. Thelt are acted on simultaneously unlessseparate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicarx, a member of the pubtic or a commissioner prior to the time theCommissionvotes on the motion to adopt.
Chairman Vistica noted that item ld,l44O Chapin Avenue, would be rescheduled for the next meetingbecause a quonrm was not present. He also requested that item lc at 1160 Broadway be removed andplaced on the action calendar. He noted that the following two items remained on the Consent Calendar:
1147 Rollins
Commission
fl fl>-'rCity of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
at7:20p.m.
information needed is received in time. This item
-{a.1147 ROLLINS ROAD _ ZONED C.I _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONVERT AN EXSTING GAS STATION REPAIR SHOP TO A MINI-MART (GUS GRECO,
APPLICANT; H.P. ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER; CLOVER TRUST, PROPERTY
OWNER)
CP Monroe presented a srmrmary ofthe staff report. Commissioners asked: how many customers currently
come to this site each day; why does the city have its present policy about selling alcoholic beverages at
gasoline service stations; this is proposed to be a 24hotr operation, can staffprovide information on the
other 24 hour mini-mart operations in the city, also the nearby 7-Il,interms of size, number of customers,
amount of parking provided, number of employees, police activity; reconsider the interior layout with the
bathroom opening into the mini-market space might be a health problem, certainly is unsightly for shoppers;
investigate what the police problems are when a mini-mart business operates at this location, compare police
concerns with Chevron Station at Broadway and 7 -ll;think the 7- 1 1 use presents a traffic issue, how many
customers go there and when do they come, what are the number ofmovements in and out and at what times.
This item was set for the regular action calendar on August 27, 2}0l,or the next available calendar when all
the information is available to respond to the commission's concerns. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m.
4. 1440 CHAPIN AVENUE, SUITE 250 - ZONED C.l SUBAREA 81 _ APPLICATION FOR
CONDITION PERMIT FORA FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (rroME MORTGAGE) (DOROTHY
LOW, WELLS F MORTGAGE INC., APPLICANT; CORTNA INVESTMENTS LTD.,
C. Auran recused himself from item noting that he has leased property in this building recently. He
stepped down from the dais. CP presented a summary of the staffreport.
Commissioners asked: how does applicant justi$, that the maximum number of people on site at one
time will be 15; will this office used at all on week-ends; how long has this business been at this
location; why are several ofthe agents
questions and the item was set for the
offrces are atthis locationrarelythere. There were no further
calendar at the Augu $ ?,7, 2001, meeting providing all
the information is submitted to the Planning in time. This item concluded at7:30 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
CONSENT CALENDAR- ITEMS zNTHE ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE, T,HEYARE
ACTED ON SIMULTANEOUSLY UNLESS SEPARATE IS REQUESTED BY THE AP PUCANT,
A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PNOR TO
TO ADOPT.
TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON THE MOTION
Chairman Vistica noted that item 5c, 531 Corbitt Drive,moved to the action calendar as requested
relationship within 500'of Item #5d,1522earlier from the floor. Chairman Vistica noted he had a
Los Altos Drive, and he would abstain from voting for that Chairman Vistica then asked if anyone
in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any other consent calendar. There were no
additional requests. Remaining on the Consent Calendar were:
5A. 147T DRAKE AVENUE _ ZOIYED R-l - APPLICATION FOR
2
AND SPECIAL
CARR, McCINTIAN, INCTRSOLL, THoMPSoN & Honu
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT I-AW
216 PARK ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 513
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94OI I4513MARKD. HUDAK
mhudak@cmithlaw.com
TELEPHONE (650) 342-9600
FACSTMILE (650t 342-7685
www.cmithlaw.com
October 25,2001
Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
1147 Rollins Road
Union 76 Gas Station/IVlini-mart
Dear Commissioners:
Our office has been retained to assist Gus and Gladys Greco with their application to
remodel the service station at ll47 Rollins Road and to replace the three existing service bays
with a mini-mart.
At the initial public hearing of this matter on September 10, the Commissioners raised
several issues, which we address here.
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. The original application included a request to sell
alcoholic beverages at the mini-mart. This is a traditional part of mini-mart sales. At the initial
public hearing, the City explained its policy against the sale of alcoholic beverages at mini-marts
and noted that sales had not been permitted at the other three mini-marts in town. Based on this
policy, the Grecos have agreed to withdraw this part oftheir application.
Tralfic Study. The other major concern at the hearing was with regard to traffic. The
Commissioners requested a traffic study. We engaged Wilson Engineering t frun"portation
Consultants, Inc. to study the net effect of closing the service bays and replacing them with the
mini-mart. I enclose John Wilson's study, dated October 22,2001.
As you review the sfudy, please bear in mind that each customer creates two "trips,,'one
in and one out of the facility. Basbd on sales records maintained by the Grecos, the currint
configuration creates 634 daily trips, inctuding 14 for the se,nrice bays and 8 for the employees.
This projects to an average of 306 fuel customers per day.
Mr. Wilson notes that a study conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments
shows that adding a mini-mart increases the trip generation by approximately 6.7yo. For the
1147 Rollins Road station, this tanslates to about 40 additional tips per day if the mini-mart is
3?1;o;l; fi".\i.*rs
for the existing service bays would be eliminated, liaving
" REUffi VE D
ocT 2 5 20or
CITY OF 8URIINGAME
PLANNING DE PT
Re
Planning Commission
October 25,2001
Page2
As you can see, the mini-mart is not expected to generate a significant number of new
trips per day. However, the applicant believes that overall sales will increase when fuel
customers have the opportunity to purchase food and other convenience items at the mini-mart.
These increased sales justiff the cost of converting the stations.
Conditions of Approval. Two proposed conditions of approval were under discussion at
the initial hearing. The first involved the ATM machine. A cash-onlyATM has been in use at
the station since the Grecos purchased it back in 1990. Therefore, the proposed ATM simply
represents a continuation of an existing service which, to date, has not been a problem. We
request that Condition 5 in the staff report be deleted.
Second, the staff report ind.;':ates that hot food should not be prepared on or sold from the
site. The Grecos propose to sell hot coffee and to provide a microwave which would allow
customers to heat prepackaged food. Again, these are existing services at the station and have
been in place since the Grecos acquired it in 1990. They are traditional parts of a mini-mart
operation. We would ask that Condition 3 in the staffreport be revised to permit these services.
In summary, the proposed project would represent an aesthetic enhancement at this
location. The conversion of the service bays to a mini-mart would not result in a significant net
increase in traffic. For these reasons, we request that the application be approved with ttre
modification to the conditions noted above. Thank you for your consideration.
very
Mark D. Hudak
MDH:la
Enclosure
cc: Gus and Gladys Greco
21970.00001\BcuB l\l l20t 87. I
RECEIVED
ocT 2 5 200t
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
MEMORANDUM
To:Mr. Gus Greco, Owner
Union 76 Service Stadon
I147 Rollins Road
Burlingamc, CA 94019
From: John Vilson
Date: October 22, 2001
RE: Trip Gencration Evaluadon for Proposed Service Stadon Modificadons at ll47
Rollins Road in rhe Ciry of Burlingame
& TIANSPORTATTON
CONSULTANTS, INC
CIVIL ENGINfERINC
STUOIES
DESICi\
Pcr your rcquest,'Wilson Enginecring has complcted a rcvicw of traffic gcneradon arpccrs
of your proposed servicc srtdon modificadons at 1147 Rotfuns Road in rhe Ciry of
Burlingame. Our undcntanding is rhe projccr would consist ofconvening orisdng service
bay areas to a mini-mart with limited food scrvice. We undencand the mini-mar will
have a small, convenicncc markct rypc character and nor scrve hot food, other rhan pre-
packcd sandwiches or rolls that can be micro-wavcd and hor coffec. Scrvice sations wirh
mini-markea atc relarively common today. They arc rypicalty providcd as morc of an
incidental rype usc for addcd sales of conveniencc rype goods/ aniclcs to pcople dready
purchasing fucl.
In- terms ofuip generation charactcristics, srudies complered by rhe San Diego Associadon
of Governments (SANDAG) of service sadons both with and without mini-marts
indicared an approximarcly 6.67 percent grcater t'ip generation tatc for a stadon wirl-r a
mini-marr vcrsus without a mini-man on an ovcralt daily basis. The project will also
include rhe dosurc of the threc cxisting service bays which will eliminaii servicc related
rraffic (six cusromers/ day plus a mechanic).
The attached rable I provides a summary of rip estimates using trip generation factors
reflective of thc currcnr and potcntia.l configuracions of the sation. The trip generation
figures for existing opcntion of rhe stadon are based upon a rcvicw of rhC annuar fuet
sales for thc sation and cstimated scrvice bay and employcc uaftc. A revicw of the
annual sales and usc of dre indusuy standard of an avcrage salc of 15 gallons yicldi an
average of 306 sales transactions or vehicles pcr day. pcrccntagcs of daily uaffic that
occur during rhe AM and PM pcek periods are from SANDAG also. Scwicc bay and
employee related traffic is dso based upon informadon provided by the stadon owner/
operaror. Rcvicw of the tablc will indicate thc sation, in its currcnr configuradon with
three servicc bays, is cstimatcd ro generxre approximacely 634 uips per day- of which 44
occur during.the moming peak commurc hour and 5l during thc evining pcak commute
hour. Thc three odsdng scrvice bays alone, arc csdmated io g.rr.r"t ii trips per day
(two, onc-way trips for six cltstomers and a mechanic) of whidr one occun during the
morning peak hour with anodrer rwo during rhc evcning pcak hour. _ -RECEIVED
OcT 2 5 2001
70 ZOE STTEET
suttE 200
slN FtANCtSCO. CA
9ato7
rEL, tlttl97a-5071
t^x: (lttl t71-5073
CITY OF BURI.INGAME
PLANNING DEPT, '
I(/ILSON
ENGINEERING
TR NSPORTATIO:'
I'LANNING
Mr. Gus Greco
October 22,2001
Page 2
Funher review of Tablc I will indicate thc proposed modifications or conversion of rhc scrvice bays
to a mini-man is esdmated to rcsult in an increase of 26 :o:ips (6.67% increase of fuel relared craffic -
14 scrvicc bay rclared erip$ pcr day of which mo would occur during rhe morning pcak hour with
another addidonal trip occurring during the evening peak hour.
RECEIVED
ocT 2 s 2001
C ITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Table I, Trip Generetioa
Use Size
(r)
Average Daily
Traffic
Fector (2) Trips
AM Peat Hour PM Peak Hour
Factor
(3)
Trips Factor
(3)
Trips
Eristing Conditions
Service Bays 7
Employees (4) 4
Fuel Sales 306
Total
2
2
14 $Vo
7%
I tt%2
0
49
5l
8 0
612
634
43
44
8o/o
Proposcd Conditions
Mini Mart
Employees 4
Fuel Sales with 326 (5)
Mini Malt
Subrotal
280
2 552Jil 7% 46
0
8o/o 52
<)660 45
Net Nem Trips versus Eristing +26 +2 I +l
(l)Numbcr of fuel sales customers, service bay related customers (plus mechanic), or employins.
Informaion provided by Station owncr/operaror. Number oi sales .usrom.rs is daily average
based upon review of annual sa.les records
One-wey tripc per customer or employee. (inbound and our trips)
Percent ofdaily 1ig1 occy*ing in rhe AM or PM peak hours based upon surveys of multiple
service stations, SANDAG, 1998.
Assumes one employee for each of dlrer slnfts (6 AM - 2pM,2 pM - l0 pM, and l0 pM _
2 AM) plus a bookkeeper mid-afternoon daily.
Assumes 6.579o increase in starion patronage associated with a mini-man (SANDAG, l99g)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(r)
RECEIVED
ocT z 5 2001
C ITY OF B U Rt INGAM E
PTANNING DEPT.
,Jun 2? 01 O6:5?p iustin 76 6505952 I 77
Gus Greco
I147 Rollins Rd.
Burlingarne, Ca.94010
650-444-908 I
August 15,2001
City of Burlingame
Response to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission
I ) Currently we have around 250 custorncrs a day and around 190 on weekends. We don't expect a signiticant
increase in amount of customers; we expect flre same gasoline customers become customerc f "he mini mart-
2) The station has always been a 24 hours operation.
3) The Health Departmenr already approved the plan.
4) We just finished a mini man in our San Carlos location. The one in Burlingame will be very similar ro that one. lf
the commissioners like to visit it, the address is 90 El camino Real, San carlos.
Please feel tiee to contact us at 650-444-908 I with any other questions. Thank you.
Cus
p.2
MINUTES F'ROM PRIOR
PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS ON GASOLINE
STATIONS WITH SNACK
SHOPS/NIINI-MARTS
Planning Commission Minutes September L2, L994
structure the tent must comply with article 32 of the UniformFire Code;that the temporary tent shall be removed on Tuesday,
November 15,994; 4) that the project shall meet Uniforn guildi
Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlcodes and
and 5) tha
Wednesday,N
t_nldiand
t ,ite shall be inspected for removal of the on
16, 1994.
by C. Ellis and passed on a 7-O ce vote.Motion vras se
Appeal procedures advised.
6. SIGN EXCEPTTON
Reference staff report,diseussed the. reguest,,
conments, and study meet quest,ions.
suggested for consideration
Chm. Galligan opened the
Medford Avenue, Hayvrard,present. There were no
vras closed.
10 CADILL,AC WAY, ZONED C-JAUES HANNAY,
lL2l94, .with att ts.CP Monroe
Departmentt,ions were
iewed criteria,P
C. Jacobs noted this sign
moved approval of thisfollowing conditions: 1)
on the plans submitted to
August 11, L994 Eleva11") arid the maximurn s
wilI ieatit the
Plann
Layout (11t'
of the rOldsmob elP
a
and the public hearing
become a landmark, she thenby resolut,ion, with theet shall be buil.t, as shownartment and date stamped17r') and Section (9L,, X
169
was
orschet copy portionpplieant shall applyto be put on thisto installation ofect shall meet all
due toon was
Steve Buckner,
Economy Sign Company'
of the pole sign shal 190 SF; 2') thatfor a sign exc for any addit,ional sisite or any copy on these signs pr
as amended bythe City.
Motion hras by C. Mink and passed on a O voice vote.AppeaI ures were advised.
rn di sion Commissioners noted that this sign is
the sign or
Uniform Bui
its
requ
copyi and 3)
Uniform Fire that, the
Code
and the fact it revolves and the sign exc
because the applicant had agreed to it years agoifue reviews should consider this as a nonconformingthe copy is being changed.
7. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A SNACK BAR WITH TAKE OUT TOOD AT 601CALIFoRNTA DRIVE, zoNED c-2 SUBAREA B (RoeER AND BETH
SPERRTNG, PROPERTY OWNERS AND ROGER L. SPERRING, APPLICANTI.
Reference staff report, 91L2194, with attachments. cp Monroediscussed the request, reviewed criteria, pranning Departmentcomments, and study meeting questions. six conditions weresuggested for consideration.
on
-3-
lingame Planning Commission Minutes September L2, L994
chm. .G_al1igan opened the public hearin_g. Roger sperring, Ls7Barroilhet Avenue, tlt" applicant respond-ed to 6i"=tiorr= fron ttrecomrnissionl he _explained rnany.gas stit,ions are iaainqt a mini-martbecause of the low profit margins on gasoline ana iirei feel this isneeessary in order to rem-ain- conpetltive and suppllnent ineone.There wirl be no perishabres for sare ari '-!o"as will_ beprepackaged. He noted unl-ile the stop and co coriveni"r...-"torr"down the street, people wourd buy. his .vbod_s onry wrren they stoppEafor- .gas.- They would not arive ft for rltait iiJns -;-= -;destination. The number of employees will renain at (4) four-onf_y2 drive cars to work; it wourd-be preferabl"e to retiiri tn. pi"p;asaf,.es because it is a community ierviee. There were no furthercomments and the public hearing was closed.
commissioners asked if items could be sold in vending mactrines, theapprieant, noted the items wotrl.d be in open ""=""--Lr- i" -"""i";;
wi-thin the 400 sF sales 1.el. The gas wourd be piie for therealso- A-large space wourd-also serl-gift items; "^r"r.g" stay toget gas is 5 to 1o minutes, he would ie}oeate .in-.rra ,it"i-'t""*isrands.t,o sqeed up -stay at gas punpsi unusuar to trave nj-;i-;";;;;at stat'ion with active serviee-LayLr'where wi.ll ".i= for servieeand employees be parked appli.cant, is talking to-n"rtt;";-il;;freeing up adjacent street p-arring wirr joeiLy'"r, =ii", eliminatelong t'erm stored_carsi propane cannot be moved-because of 1oeationsof wast,e oil tank.
conmissioners noted concerns about, sale of items otheil than snacks,auto relat,ed items seemed okay; could sales be done Eo, a smallerspace 1Or X 10t for example.
c. Deal moved approval of this appLieat,ion with amended condition#4. atr.owing only auto related sales and limiai;g-I;e appricant toa total of 10o sF allowed for retai.l sales. uot,ii. *i= seconded byc. Key. After much discussion on the motion-""Ii"g ttt" need. ofspaee for bathrooms and office, want, to keep sates-Lo snacks andauto related items; shourd not, terl-applica"€ n", t" lu.. busfi;;thow will trash from snack area fe rrah-aree; snoula not se1tr itemsr*-" _ f rowers i c. Dear withdrew his mot,ion ;;ta 'ia., agreed towithdraw her second.
Then c. Erlis moved approvar of a retail sares area at 2oo sF, andsales limited to snacks and auto related iteurs orilt, conditionsappropriately. modified and by resolution.
Mot'ion $ras seconded py e. Dea1. rt, faired on a 3-4 (Jacobs, Kerry,Mink and Gatrigan dilsenting) rorr carr vote. rn discussion thecommissioners noted a rnini- mart serrs every thing incrudingarcohoric beverages, sinee opposed to range of merctrandise keeparea smarr; arcohoric beverage sare is not .pp=op=iate-ior--il:stations.
Next c. Kerry .novqd approval of the apprication with amended.conditions eliminating c6naition *a rerat^in;-i;-r6"J of irems tobe sord, and adding a condition that the permit be reviewed in L2months.
:4-
Iingame Planning Commission Minutes September L2, L994
Mcition was second.ed by c. Galligan. and failed on a 2-5 (Dea1,
iiiir, Jacobs, K.y, an& uink dissenting) ro11 call vote.
c. Key ttren moved approval of the application, by resolution,
noting that ro .J"on'olic beverages sh-oula be sold and the it'em
;h;"ie be ..ri.r"a in L2 months, amending - the conditions as
i"fforr: 1) that the snack bar shall be built as shown on ttre
;1;;;'-;orriit"a to the Planning De_pa{tnent and date stamped July-Zg, tgg+ Street Z, Elevati.onsi- and Sheet L, Site -Plan with the
p"iXi"g lay,out and landscaping qhqwn.on Sheet.Rl (a2tt X 11rr) date
stamped August 8, Lgg4i 2l - that th-e. eonditions of the citlr
U"gi'r"""s, iugus.t'e, Lg_ga memo (ole pa:rking space leTI to ttre snack
ba:r shall be- signed for snack baf parking) and Chief Building
inspectors, augu-st 8, L?g4 memo (ADA signing required for ttre
disabLed .oo"==1Ule parking stall) shall be net; 3) that the snack
bar shall fe-open eigo A.I'!. to 9:30 P.M. Monday through Friday;
7:oc.ti.M. to BrbO P.t't. Saturday; and' 9.:OO A.ll; to 6:O0 P'M' Sunday';
*iitt ; maximum of four employees at any one- timel 4) ttrat no
ii".tt"fic Ueveiages shall b; so-ta fron the snack area; 5) !!at |n9
""i=[i"g .ppi"-*{rately 6:-0" ta}tr hedge l}gng !h". residential'
il6;;ty ririe shar.t bd naintained at this minimum heigtrt; 6) that'
"thG--"6bfication shall be revi.ewed for compliance in one yeSr
(Septefr$er, 1995) a!d. upon complaint thereafter; and 7)- that' the
pi"j""t sniff ,""t, aII tfre reguirem-ents.of the Uniform Bui.Iding and
t"i6"=, Fire Codes as amended by the city of Burlingame'
Motion tras seconded. by C. Gall.igan and passed on la 4-3 (Deal,
Jaeobs, and Mink diss6nting) roll eaI1 vote. Appeal procedures
were advised.
B.
Reference
diseussed
conments,
suggested
TWO PARKING
LAMBERTSON,
staff report,the request,
and studY me
for: consider ation.
INGOLD ROAD,M-1 (SUSAlt
MANUFACTI'R.ING,
ttachments. CP Monroeia, Planning Departm.ent
Three conditions were
Curt Schulze was present
regard.ing BAQM and other
were no further conments
AT 35
OWNER AND
Chm. Galligan
and answeredtransportation
and the public
opendd the
the commis
publ ing
C. Jacobs noted this
and will not be de
sa ques
reduction .s.
hearing wa closed.
t is in theto property ].
moved approval of
following conditions:
est to of ttre areathe
byt the projectthe Planning
vicinity,resolution,
shewith 1)
shown on the Plans subnitted.
Jrtly 22, t994, sheets A1 and A3; 2)sha1l be built
Department and I
that any a tion of use at either 25 ld or 35
Ingold Road
variances;
I require a public hearing and an
3)that the project shall meet all Uniform
code requirements as amended by the city.
to theildinqr
with9lL2le4,
iewed
and Unif fire
-5-
fi,"'
/ Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 4
October 15, r985
is a brokericle a
immetl i ately
In further exPla nation of his business applicant statecl he
who deals in leasing vehiclesr he acquires the type of veh
customer \rants i at t imes customers cannot P ick up the car
antl the comPanY need s some space insicle to store expensive automob lesI
safelY; the comp anyr s services Prov ide bet ter financing, more flexible
lea ses.. than a re gular dealer. Staf f atlvisedr if aPProved, this auto
Ieas in s se lrould run with the ProP erty un til it is discontinuetl for
six consei tive months.
C. Schwalm c nted this appearecl to be an inoft ].\/e
ea if th- applicant c ou lal Iy wi thactivitY in that
suggested conalit
ancl acloption of
the seven conditof a seconcl.
then moved for a ova l of the
Resolution A ov ing Special
Motion
office type of
all the
special permit
Permits with
tlietl for Iack
I ons He
Commi s S
ions Ii st the s f report.
Comment on the motion:
use runs with the land.
p d now, concern in that thisthi s ea 15 1m
C. Leahy noted
the existing Pthis use. He
this iness might fit in verY well it weren I tilirI].mpac
fortofar9problem in the area anal the aCl
eal to ileny the special permit. Seconcl C'Giomi.
Comment he motion: difficult to j ustify approval in this imPacted
area,a icant is look 1ng in the wrong P lace; use is too intensive for
the a; this is a ch angr ng section of t he city, perhaps Commission
shoul tt stucly uses in th e area. Motion to deny was approvetl on a 4-2
ro11 call vote, Cers Schwalm an
Appeal procedures were adlvised '
4. SPECIAI, PERI.,IIT TO REPI.,ACE AN EXISTING GAS STATION AT
I1OI BROAD wAY,ZONED C-1
d Garcia cl issenting, C. Graham absent -
Reference stsaff reporE, LO/L5/85, with attachments' CP llonroe reviewed
iletaiLs of the request, code requirement for reviewing gasoline service
;;;ti;;"; stiir review, stud'; meeting questions' Four conilitions were
suggestett for consiileration at the public hearing'
Discussion: tr,ro relatively new fuel- tanks will remain; circulation
within the site; acltl to the conditions the requirement of four posts to
pi"l."t ihe sares building; provisi-on of restrooms available to the
irUfic; property o$rner is ahlvron oSA, rnc'; is an economic feasibility
ieport- rlqui re6- (staff felt this station has alemonstrated over the oast
Si'V""r" its economic feasibility); snack room will not be open to the
public at night for security reasons.
Cliff Perry, Car roll/Resources Enqineering & Managementr San Mateo'
r"pt""""ting the property ovrnerr -!^ras present' He commentecl on his
aii.""= i""" - rri th ;taif to establish agreement anal disPlayed a colored
Jrawing of the proposal which is designed to allow safe circulation and
;;;;;;: tne stition has been there since 1933 with some minor
i"r""a"r i"g in 197I; very litt1e auto maintenance is 6one at the present
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 5
October 15, 1985
time; station has been redesigned to provide a facility suitable to thecommunity's present day standards; will provide air and water anC addlandscapi.g, after intersection widening will provide more landscapingto a net of 8.98; appricant is in agreement with a1l suggestedconditions but would request_public restrooms not be re{rlirea; propertyis deed restricted. (1906 deed retrictions) from the sale of alcohol;tle plans address the entire improvement on the site and do not includeadjacent parcel.
Commission discussion/comments concern that no public restrooms are tobe proviiled since this is a common service of gas stations the poUiiohas become used to; Mr. Perry st,ated the publii has become insensitive,this type of service start.ed i.n the early'30s, applicant, does not wishto encoulage loitering and it could contribute to-a traffic problem,Chevron feels customers are not demanding restrooms novr, thi; is aneighborhood station and pat.rons would be close to home; also adding arestroom wourd require removal of some randscaping. sever.ilcommissioners fert pubric restrooms should be pro.iia.a, citing theproximit'y of the. freeway and that families traireling with smallchildren find this is a needed service. Concern wa6 expressed abouton-sit.e circulatior, particularly when alI pumps are in"use; ce-i"itthere was sufficient room for vehicles to go i; a circular movementaround. the pump islands when they are in uie. The fulr serviceproposed to be available was defined as the service of an attendantputting the nozzLe in the tank and also checking the oil; there wouldbe two fuII time employees during the daylight if,ift; air and waterwould be available in back out of the circuration put.n.
chT. Garcia opened the public hearing. There $rere no audience commentsand the pubtic hearing was closed. -
Commenting she was sorry to see maintenance service leave the area, C.Giomi moved for approval of this special permit and for adoption oiCommission Resolution Approving Special Pirmits with the toifowintconditions: (1) that the condi.tions of the Fire Marshalfs eugust II,1985 memo and the City Engineerrs October 2, l9g5 memo s..Lrl-be met;(2, that the applicant shall make separate application to the plannirgand.Building Departments for any signage on trris site; (3) tnat-[heproject shall be built consistent with the plans submitted tc thePlanning DepartmenL and date stamped octobei 1, 1985 with tha "Jaitio"of four posts to protect the salei building and that restrooms beavailable to the public 24 hours a day; and (4) that snack items belimited to a 100 sF area housing a 3-door refrigeration unit,-on"-"rr"ttunit for snack items and one shelf unit. for candy,/gum,/cigareit"", ""alcoholic beverages will be sold and patrons' access wili be ii*it.a toa pass-through window between 11:00 p.M. and 7:00 A.M. second c.Leahy; motion approved on a G-0 rolr call vote, c. Graham absent.Appeal procedures were advised.
I
AppIi
heari
OF
cant was not yet pre
n9.
CHANNIT\GcING - 11
os ed the public
t
x
i \r,,same Planning Commission Minutes July 8, 1996
no later than October 1, 1996;7) that the applicant shall remove once a day or more frequently,
if determined to be necessary by the City, all take-out debris on the sidewalk, in the gutter, and in
planters, in front of the store along Iorton Avenue, and within 50' of the store in each direction;
and 8) that the Proiect shall meet all the requirements of the municipal code and of the 1995 edition
california Building and Fire Codes as amended by the city of Burlingame.
Motion was seconded by C. Galligan and passed on a 6&1 roll call vote (C. Ellis absent). Appeal
procedures were advised.
6. APPLICATION FOR A TAKE-OI'T PERMIT FOR A SNACK SHOP IN TIIE CHEVRON
STATION AT zffi IlL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C.1, SI]BAREA A, (CIIEVRON, USA,NC., PROPERTY OWNER AND NANETTE NAMES, nfBnnSgNiIrIC R. H. LEE &,
AS$OCIAIES, APPLICAIW, .
fire l$plication is continued frorn the fune 10, Lgg6.
Reference staff report,7.8.96 with attaehments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed
criteria, Planning Dqrartment eomments, ild study meting questions. Eleven conditions were
suggested for consideratiol. The City Attorney noted that this is a conditional use permit for retail
sales of food and other take-out items AT A GASoLINE STATIoN, I.E., INTENSIFICATION
OF USE, it is not a "take-out' permit. The food sales came after the current remodelling project.A commissioner noted that condition #2 ltmits certain food items that may be desirable such as
coffee prepared on-site.
l.ting Chair Key oryyred the public hearing. Jim Irwin, 6001 Bollinger Canyon.Road, San
representing Chevron, was present for questions. He noted tftat originaf5r the gas tLtion
sold items through vending machines and the new snack shop sells basicatly the same items but awider variety of them.
The commission asked 1!t1-ttre proposed hours for the snack shop. The applicant indicated ttrat
letwcen 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. the snack shop is closed to waik-in custi"mers, items are sold
through a transaction window for seeurity purposes. The commission wanted to know what took
so long for the applicant to apply for a permit. The applicant indicated they were confused on
whether they needed a special permit since they were selling basically the same items as before.
The Chewon 8as station at the @rner of Broadway and California Drive is a food mart which sells
bread, milk and other convenience items; different from what is proposed here. At Z@ELCamino
Real they have what the corporation calls a snack shop. The fooA sabs are for the convenience of
the gas customer.
Bill Currie, Currie's Automotive, Ioc., Chevron Dealer's tenant at Zfi El Camino Real,Burlingame, spoke in favor of the project. He added that hot food is not prepared-il;U til"gi
transaction window after 11:00 p.m. There were no other comments and the public hearing wL
closed.
-4-
Planning Commission Minutes Iuly 8, 1996
Commission discussed eliminating the microwave oven for heating foods. There wits a concern
expressed about the amount of trash created from hot wrapped foods. A finding for ttre parking
variance for one stall was suggested. Parking was not seen as a problem since the site does not
appear overburdened with vehicles, based on frequent observations, and the five qpaces provides
enough pa*ing for all the uses on-site. Findings for the permit amendment to add a snack shop' include that ptirchases are typically taken back to the car of the gas customer so litter is not dropped
on the street.
C. Wellford made a motion.for approval of the parking variance and special permit amendment to
add a snack shop based on the reasons stated by the applicant and by the commissioners, with
condi[on #3 amended to indicated that a microwave oven or other cooking element shall not be
allowed.
Discussion on the motion suggested clarifying condition #8 to include that three (3) total trash
receptacles will be provided at the location; ryecifred. Also there was discussion about ttre use of
a heating element and that it would not impact the arnount of trash in the area. The cornrnission
then moved, by resolution, for approval of this request based on the stated findings, with the
following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department and date stamped fune 26, 1996 Sheet 1 - Site Plan with one parallel
pa*ing stall along the southeast property line, and Sheet 2 - Floor Plan date stamped May 2, 1996,
andSrh'X 11' date stamped May 16, 1996 showing24'0 minimum back up area from northeast
service bay to the closest edge of the one parallel parking stall along the southeast property line;
2) ttrat no alcoholic beverages shall be sold ftom ttre snack area and the snack shop shall only sell
prepackaged convenience snack items strch as sodas, juices, coffee, cindy, chips, and cigarettes,
batteries, and over the counter medications but not including the sale of any foods prepared on-site
or unpackaged such as sandwiches, pies, cakes, bread; 3) that no microwave oven or other cooking
element shall be available on-site to be used by customers to heat or retreat foods and the applieant
shall obtain a San Mateo County Health permit for the sale of food and shall comply with all its
requirements, conditions, and inspetions; 4) that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall
be prohibited in the snack area or on the premise; 5) that an amended building permit shall be
obtained showing the required fire exit door ftom the snack area, for all new construction associated
with the installation and implementation of the snack area, and resriping of the parking area shall
be inqpected by the City Engineer; Q that the conditions of the City Engineer's December 22, 1995
memo shall be meq A that the snack aiea shall be open the same hours as the gasoline station, 24
hours a &y, seven days a week, with a ma:rimum of five employees on-site at any one time, and
the snack area shall not be open independent of ttre gasoline station; 8)that the applicant shall
purcharc and maintain at least daily, more often if necessary, three (3) trash receptacles; one at the
door to the snack shop, one along the property line on Burlingame Avenue, and one on El. Camino
Real at qpecific locations approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department; 9) the gas station
operalor shall install and maintain on El Camino and Burlingame Avenue, the Eash receptacles
selectd by the Burlingame Avenue Sheetscape Study and these containers shall be installed no later
than October 1, 1996; 10) firat the applicant shall remove once a day or more frequently, if
determined to be necessary by the City, all take-out de,bris on ttre sidewalk, in the gutter, and in
planters, in front of the gasoline station along both the Burlingame Avenue and El Camino Real
ftontages, and within 50' of the station in each direction; and 11) that the project shall meet all the
-5-
ffi:J"#r:,fli Hfl#fflr*r*""i. or the rees edition carirornia Bulding and Fire codes as
Ttre motion was s@onded by C. MinkGalligan dissenting and C. g[i,
"br;;)
and passed on a 4-2-l rll TrI] vote (Cmsrs. Coffey and. Appeal procedures were advised.
Planning Commission Minutes
REPORTS
CP reviewed the
Iuly 8, 1996
ts aunf, Christine Coltins.
Reqpectfu IIy submitted,,
Charles Mink, Secretary
City Council regular meeting.
and Appreciarion for-I-eah Dd;,-'
a
1, 1996- Commission,
Planner, who
a resolution
leaving the City's employ.
D(. ADJOURNMEI\"I
The meeting was at9:.49 p.rn. in rnemory of
MINT.ITES7.8
-G
CITY OT'BI]RLINGAIVIE
APPLICATION TO THE PLAI\IIING COMMISSION
Ilpe of Application:_Special Permit_Variance-Other
Project 7
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
-F
Address://v7 {ZotLi,n9 {?-O S66r"tt lSoo p, Pet-sg,r P*r€.
City/State/Zip: 4,zmli r> a*t€ e -E
Phone (w):6<-o- 1V7- Eeplivet c>
Phone (oaz - 7 Z 6-? ooo
o)Lsn 3V q- e) 21 rB, ,9 ?830 r $)
ARCHITECTIDF^SIGNER
Name:I%p.m G,.ito lr-rc,Please indicate with an asterisk * the
contact person for this application.Address ?Lt to7- tI ,ilet L
City/state/zip: b *rrrt Po r uT e-4 IAb Z7
Phone (w):9{1- qq?- /9Zo
(h)
tu<t ?</?- q?3- t?23
PROJECT O.aur'e.rt bo aF S Ee;f,>6 bs n
€
4^a7&N
Pa*l Srn tes *re-€A
AFT'IDaYIT/SIGNATURE: I under penalty of perjury that the information given
herein is true and correct to the best and belief.
/l- 2oo I
Applicant's Date
I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this
application to the Planning Commission
?irr 8r^o:l+.
1zg'ztl'27 2 {s Signature Date
FOR OEFICE USE ONLY
Date lz ol *3ss.oo
Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date:_
I$ama.
1.,'..
' i2..
:
/.^
1;qs,,{re - tt z^ 't n </o, fay; ql S' Z?C - 2 982
I
a
3
COMMERCf,AL APPLICATIONS
PLANNNG COMMISSTON AIPLICAflON SITPPLEMENTAL FORM
Proposed use of the aite (er-nr) <il ec
4. Current and projected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location:
5. Current and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site:
6, What.is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner,
employeesandvisitors/customers):
7 fu;") - to (pu)
Elristing In 2 Years In 5 Years
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
Weekdays
Full-time 3 1
,Z-z-
Part-time I I
Weekends
Full-time --t2..-I Z )z--
Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years
Hours of
Operation
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
AM-
PM
After
5:00 PM
Weekdays t50 )s l5o 1s 115 1s
loo 7s )oo 7s 1oo -7s
7
8
r Where do/will the owner & employees par ld! --:--Elayq €*<* s a.
-JWhere do/will customers/visitors - Altua 3oqnt A14 O eec f aFl&ot4 4g ,,, L S /: p)t v rcu /S l*-rv oc
9. Present or most recent use of cite Rernit A-d AuTZ,Aof, eC BApeia
10. List of other tenants on property, tleir number of employees, hours of qreration (atach
Iist if necessarv).lr. A."2
Daysandhoursofoperation.Zyry ? '^;,
=1"-
-
Number of truckVservice vehicles to be parked at site (by ,*>. . (r"r*-l
Ilours of
Operation
Part-time
Weekends
Lot-
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.52.O2O1. Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatty in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these
questions.
1. Explatn why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injuriaus to
pruperTy or impqovements tn the viciniry or to public health, sqfety, geneml welfale, or convenienee.
Vk EyrS77',xtC 6u)COttG 1oer ruorlAve * Coe o'T'oJaL u,e P>eprT'
A,,r o u)A5 gui tr Pz,-om 7b V,'ha P a-Aul*fto) ' Vk f RoToseO, C/rc e
t*toctt D /v1 4D1FT, 7-*a avry7z5 ft< a,-r aflr)e Eaf e 't7/ s €tQ ur'* -
7fi) f*cr ra - s7 rce s rt'^A 4-*)'c +/f 4 P*rc7 u t LL
B d n-", *, I ms t2-
2- How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame Geneml
Plan and Taning Ordinance?
7Hn /e'7ds;A t'rr€ fre€rc Pag''24,*-{T oF
6,eb ,'n^' G o*" 'o [ /l; n*'l z* i-7 o'e D'J 1$t* e a'
3.How will the proposed pmiect be compotible with the aesthetics, masq bulk and chamcter of the
existing and potentiol uses on adjoining propefiies in the geneml vicinity?
FaoT-PPr tfi 6F Y*4. 6-TH* €tr'rt'\/1
ts.e *Lrz?-t-D' Tlre- h+tJ, BuLtL knD
0 F TV, 8r,)o i,4r; u., i,' Ra n' n )v T7+ e S **" r
,,,oi*7 -:,, itor-
ELecl,4 7-ron (*o'7 r)h
gup.frm/l1/98
r3
GJ^0.0"--_ U*^'
-q -.X- b", R"$-.4 &I '
*rv.^"h- 617.\ *n -jfi.4 Jfir
&-o"t fuI a-b"^td;.t
^/
S;.*rr., 6t 6r-<D
:{n".*-
t
the Ci
501 Pr
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRITVIROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
L]47 ROI.LINS ROAD
Monda17,Decenber 10, 2OO1 at 7:00 P.M' in
Applicati-on for conditional use permit to
"tnv"rt an existing qras station repair
shop to a mini-mart at 1L47 Rollins Road,
zoned C-1. (APN: 026-23L-L2O\
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
"nnoun"L" the following public hearing on
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
ty HaIl Council
imrose Road, Bu
Chambers located at
rlingame, California.
+l
Mailed November 30, 2001
(Please refer to other side)
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
'described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
CITY OF BURLINGAME
E
NIACrirIf(f
(Please refer to other side)
--1
i
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL DGMPTION,
CONDITIONAL USE AND TAKE-OLTT APPLICATION
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHERXAS, a categorical exemption has been proposd and application has been made for a
conditional use and take-out pennit to convert three service bays to a mini-mart at an existing gasoline station
at I 147 Rollins Road, zoned C-1, Clover Trust, property owners, APN: 02G231-l2O;.
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning commission of the city of Burlingame on
Decernber I 2001 at which time it reviewed and considered the staffreport and all other written materials
and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW' THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Plaoning Commission that:
l On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed atrd comments received
and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set
forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article
19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class I- the operation repair, maintenancg or minor alteration
of existing public or private struchres, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving
negligible or no expansion ofuse beyond that previously existing including but not limited to (a) interior or
exterior altemations involving such things as interior partitiors, plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
2. Said conditional use and take-out permits are approvd subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A'attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permits are as set forth in the minutes and
recording of said meeting.
3. It is ftrther directed that a certified copy ofthis resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Joseph Bojues , Secretary of the Plarming Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff
that the foregoing resolution was inhoduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the l0th day of December, 2001 ,bythe following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
1
EXHIBIT ItAIi
Conditions ofapproval for categorical exemption and conditional use and take-out permits.
1147 Roltins Road effective Jan aarry 7,2002
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
and date stamped June l, 2001, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a mini-mart/sales
area of 1,695 SF including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office and an 84 SF public
restroom;
that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except
hot beverages) be prepared on or sold from the site;
that the conditions ofthe City Engineer and ChiefBuilding Official's January 16,2OOl
memos shall be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on the
prenuses;
that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-mart,
and to be limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash
receptacles on-site one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
that tne applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent street frontages for 50
feet in either direction and keep them clean and free ofdebris and litter associated with
the mini-mart; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
2
.)
4
6
8
9
that any changes in operatiorl type of product sold or floor area, shall be brought to the
Burlingame Planning Commission for approval,.
s,{
.i
t
i:
-:. ... ,i
-i':.J'";
- -11A
]
}
j
-qo €c
S /*\/
ttftyu11'46t R[,,eL
ii:
';.,
-r.
"nl Iy - al
nf'l-b I
9llir,f;fi)li\'f,rlrI,," I ._i
.t f
:.
I
fl
i
!
I
I
i:-F
ir
- I *
rl !.!t
F
t- ---..
t
. . -=.,'-,.j
\"t*i
E
\
q
i.
\,t
\
,,+*#5
t.-
,t
I
dE'
"t
{
'Itrt.r,
T
,?
tr
tiIItr
I
I
I
I
,.-.
'a
;l ',. ,:- k
'/@
,I,{} '
I f
g.
rtr
.
tc
tl
:.
| . t l-
il ii,
I
r*
ni l-3
'*,*
, ri il
j il
1u
ril
-j'.
:'!i I
.n
II
J.
q;r
z
iii!
I l'i
ttlr
ttlilt
.a
,
. (t
:;, it ..
I
.,
tt.,
i.
!
'rt
I
,
)tvt'3 fl 2u,.r'tvs K o
*
}
l
.'.1.- t-
'.:
.1.
s.tr-t::
t.., :
i *
r
-., ll
i
r!
--hrr_b
lt u
-<..-*-.
r
:;;@-
1
a
,f,
i1\J
I
f
\*
1
{
I
f !
't
G"I*;,;l
aI
*
t
Self
&.'jF;-.Y,rry{n('
t
i
t
c,.
i:
{i
::
,,',..,r1'
5
I
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CONDITIONAL USE AI\[D TAKE-OUT APPLICATION
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a
conditional use and take-out permit to convert three service bays to a mini-mart at an existing easoline
station at 1147 Rollins Road. zoned C-1. Clover TrusL proper8 owners. APN: 026-231-120;-
-
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on December 10.
2001 at which time said application was denied;
WHEREAS, thismatterwas appealedto CitvCouncil andahearingthereonheldon January23.
2002. at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEKEFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Counoil rhat:
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submiffed and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class I- the operation repair, maintenance,or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing
including but not limited to (a) interior or exterior altemations involving such things as interior partitions,
plumbing, and electrical conveyances.
2- Said conditional use and take-out permits are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use perrnits ar" us set forth in the minutes and
recording of said meeting.
3. It is fiuther directed that a certified copy ofthis resolution be recorded in the official records
of the County of San Mateo. I .
MAYOR
I, ANN MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby cg4iry that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the- 23m iay of fanuary. IOOZ.
and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CMY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO.
EXHIBIT'iA''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use and take-out permits.
1147 ROLLINS ROAI)
EFFECTTVE JAI\IUARY 23, 2OO2
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Deparbnent and date stamped June 1, 20[l, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a
mini-mart/sales area of 1,695 SF including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office arld
an 84 SF public restroom;
2. that any changes in operation, qpe of product sold or floor area, shall be brought to the
Burlingame Planning Commission for approval,.
3 that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart nor shall hot food (except
hot beverages) be prepared on or sddfrom the site;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official's January 16,2OOt
memos shall be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on
the premises;
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-
mart, and to be limited to cash dispensing only with no deposit capabilities;
7. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash
receptacles on-site one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
that tbe applicant shall potice for trash daily, og-site and adjacent street frontages for 50
feet in either direction and keep ttrem,c-!ean and free of debris and litter associated with
the mini-mart; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
8
9
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPABTMENT
501 PBIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
LL47 ROT.T.INS ROAD
Appea1 of a Planning Conunission denial of
an application for a conditional use
permit to convert an existing gas station
repair shop to a mini-mart at 1L47 Rollins
Road, zoned C-1. (APN: O26-23L-L2O'|
The City of Burlingame City Council
announces the following public hearing on
Wednes&y, ilaauary 23, p92 aX 7:O0 P.M.
in the City HaIl Council Chambers located
at 50L Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
Mailed ,January L1, 2002
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Acopy ofthe
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
limited to
hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
Chr-lf"<)llt^
(Please refer to other side)
CE
I
LLdiIII
EXHIBIT ''A''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use and take-out permits.
1147 ROLLINS ROAD
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 20, 2002
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
and date stamped June l, 2001, site plan, floor plan, and elevations with a mini-mart/sales
area of 1,695 SF including the gas station cashier, an 80 SF office and an 84 SF public
restroom;
2. that any changes in operation, type of product sold or floor area, shall be brought to the
Burlingame Planning Commission fbr approval;
3. that no alcoholic beverages shall be sold from the mini-mart, the only cooked food prepared
or sold on site shall be that heated in a microwave oven (except hot beverages);
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official's January 16, 200I
memos shall be met;
5. that any customer seating at tables and chairs shall be prohibited in the sales area or on the
premises;
6. that there shall be only one free-standing ATM on-site, to be installed within the mini-mart,
and to be limited to cash dispensing onlv with no deposit capabilities;
7. that the applicant shall purchase and maintain daily, more often if necessary, trash
receptacles on-site one of which will be placed by the door to the mini-mart sales area;
8. that the applicant shall police for trash daily, on-site and adjacent street frontages for 50
feet in either direction and keep them clean and free of debris and litter associated with the
mini-mart;
9. that the mini-mart and gas station operator shall install security cameras as required by the
Burlingame Police Department with film of a type approved by the Police Department;
10. that the mini-mart and gas station operator shall install a hold-up alarm of the type
approved by the Burlingame Police Departrnent; placed at a location approved by the
Police Department;
11 that the mini-mart and gas station operator shall provide on-site a safe in which to store
cash of a type and at a location site approved by the Burlingame Police Department; and
12. thatthe project shall meet all the requirements ofthe California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
i,/
"/it'I,1
FF f,e
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 2t20t2002
5e
STA PORT
TO Honorahle l\zfavor and
DATE Januarv 31 200,_APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson. Citv
ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.08 TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE CERTAIN
PROVISIONS OF TITLES 4 AI\D 5 OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE
AND CONFORMING BACKFLOW PROTECTION FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
S
BY
1
L
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt ordinance to update the City's adoption of the County Environmental Health Code provisions and direct
City Clerk to publish a summary of adoption within 15 days.
DISCUSSION:
The City has used the County's environmental health code provisions for the past 25 years. The County has
been very responsive to City concerns and has an excellent health department.
This proposed ordinance will update the Municipal Code with the current governing provisions regarding
environmental health from the County Ordinance Code, which includes rodent and vector control, milk
regulations, restaurants, wells, chemical toilets, and storage of hazardous substances.
Fees for permits and inspections for the health services will match those adopted in the County Ordinance Code.
The ordinance was introduced on January 23,2002, further reading was waived at that time, and notice of the
proposed adoption was duly published.
Attachment
Proposed Ordinance
County Ordinance Provisions
Distribution
Director of Public Works
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
l3
14
l5
16
17
l8
T9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.08 TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF TITL_ES 4 (SANITATION AND HEALTH) AND 5 (BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE AND CONFORMING
BACKFLOW PROTECTION FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. The City of Burlingame has used the services of the SanMateo County
Environmental Health Officer and the provisions of the San Mateo County Environmental Health
Code to help ensure the health and safety of the community. This ordinance is intended to adopt
the revisions to and the new designations of the sanitation and health provisions of the San Mateo
County Ordinance Code pursuant to Government Code $ 50022.9. In addition, the provisions for
backflow protection for potable water systems should be affirmed for fire protection systems.
Section 2.Chapter 8.08 is amended to read as
Chapter 8.08
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
8.08.010
8.08.020
8.08.030
8.08.040
Adoption by reference of certain plovisions of title 4 (Sanitation and Health) of
the San Mateo County Ordinance Code
Additional provisions concerning wells
Inspection fees, permit procedures, and penalties
Health officer defined
8.08.010 Adoption by reference of certain provisions of title 4 (Sanitation and Health) ofthe San Mateo County Ordinance Code.
(a) The following chapters of titles 4 and 5 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code
are adopted by reference:
(l) Chapter 4.08 - Manure and Fertilizers;
(2) Chapter 4.12 - Mosquito Control;
(3) Chapter 4.16 - Rodents;
(4) Chapter 4.20 - Milk Regulations;
(5) Chapter 4.48 - Abatement of Nuisances;
(6) Chapter 4.52 - Environmental Health Code Generally;
(7) Chapter 4.56 - Food Establishments;
(8) Chapter 4.60 - Public Fresh Water Sports Areas;
(9) Chapter 4.68 - Wells;
(10) Chapter 4.72 - Backflow Prevention;
(11) Chapter 4.76 - Chemical Toilets
(12) Chapter 4.80 - Rodent and Insect Control;
(13) Chapter 4.84 - Individual Sewage Disposal Systems;
(14) Chapter 4.92 - Storage of Hazardous Substances;
(15) Chapter 4.108 - Prohibited Fuels; and
(16) Chapter 5.68 - Food Establishments.
8.08.020 Additionalprovisionsconcemingwells.
The following additional provisions regarding wells shall apply within the city:
(a) Double Check Valve Arrangement. Between the house or structure being served and
the water meter box or distribution system, there shall be installed a double check valve
arrangement approved jointly by the health officer and the city engineer.
(b) As apart of the investigation required by Chapter 4.68 of title 4 of the San Mateo
County Ordinance Code as adopted by this title, the health officer shall consult the city engineer
and shall not issue any well permit without the city engineer's concrurence.
8.08.030 Inspection and application fees, permit procedures, and penalties.
The inspection and application fees and the permit procedures established pursuant to
title 4 and chapter 5.64 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, with the exception of the 5
year tobacco sales permit, are approved for use by the county health officer in administering
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
Z3
24
25
26
27
28
this chapter. The penalties for violations of the provisions of this chapter shall be as provided
in chapter 1.12 of this code.
8.08.040 Health officer defined.
Unless otherwise specified, "health officer" as used in this code means the County of
San Mateo health officer appointed pursuant to Chapter 4.52 of the San Mateo County
Ordinance Code as adopted by reference pursuant to this chapter.
Section 3. Chapter 8.13 is repealed.
Section 4. Section 15.04.030 is amended to read as follows:
1 5.040.03 0 Installation of fi re protection service.
(a) All fire protection services are to be installed by the owner at his expense with the
required encroachment permit and inspection by the city public works department.
(b) A double check detector valve of a type approved by the city public works
department is required on all fire services and is to be furnished by the owner. Each building
with a fire protection service shall have its own separate fire connection with the city water
marn.
(c) A backflow prevention device, which shall be of a type approved by the director of
public works and the health officer, is required on buildings three stories or more in height.
Section 5. Section 15.04.050 is amended to read as follows:
1 5.04.050 Cross-connections and backflow.
(a) No water service connection to any premises will be installed or maintained by the
city unless the water supply is adequately protected in accordance with the requirements and
regulations of Title l7 of the California Administrative Code and this code as determined by the
director of public works and the health offrcer.
(b) The property owner or consumer who is responsible for any protective device shall
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
T7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
z)
24
25
26
27
28
have each such device inspected and tested in accordance with the requirements of the health
officer. The city shall be furnished with a copy of the test results. On each domestic service
where protection is required, two properly valved protection devices shall be installed to insure
a continuous supply of water to the premises while one unit is being tested.
(c) Failure to comply with any section of this chapter may be cause for the
discontinuance of water service by the director of public works or the health officer. The
director of public works shall give notice in writing of any violations of this chapter to the
property owner and consumer. If no action is taken within ten (10) days after such notice has
been mailed or delivered in person, the director of public works may discontinue delivery of
water. However, if the director of public works or the health officer determines that the
violation constitutes an immediate threat to the public health or safety or to the integrity of the
public water system, the director or the health officer may discontinue delivery of water
immediately without prior notice; in such an instance, the director or the health officer shall
deliver notice of discontinuance as soon as practicable to the property owner and consumer.
Delivery of water shall not be resumed until a protective device has been properly installed and
approved as provided in this section.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
23td day ofJanualy, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the day of ,200_, by the following vote:
AYES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2l
22
z)
24
25
26
27
28
C :\FILES\ORDNANC\healthcode. cdf.wpd
Ctapter 4$
MANURE AND FERfiLIZERS
4.0E.010 Manure end ferdizer
regulations
Exception.4.0t.020
40&010 Manure and fenilizer regolations
It is unlawful for any lrrson o:
(a) L-oad, rmload or handle, o( to assist in load-
ing, unloading or handling, otber than fuauling, ani
manure, fertilizer, or other decomposing ftrter, on
any prblic roa4 street o( ficoughfare of said San
Marco Cornty, or within orrc hundred yards of any
pubtic road, streEt or thoroughfarc of said San
Mareo County or within onc hundred yards of any
dwclling house then and thcrc occupied by human
bcings in said San Mateo County.
(b) Permit carloads or any othcr large quantities
of rnanure, fertilizer c otlrcr decomposing lnattsr to
stand or rcmain for aoy petiod longer than is neces-
sary in swirching or carrying a car through on any
public roa4 street or thoroughfarc of said San
Matco County, or within one hundred yards of any
public road, street or thoroughfare, or within one
hundred yards of any dwelling holse then and there
occupied by human beings in said Satr Mat€o Coun-
ty.
(c) Deposit or permit to rcrnain on any public
highway of said San MatEo Co@ty any manurc,
fertilizcr or other decomposing matter.
(d) L.et loads of manure or othet decomposing
matt€r, as the same are loaded upon wagons or other
vehicles, srand upon or along tbe publi,c roods of
San Mareo County.
(e) Haul over or upon the Couoty roads of said
Conty any nunurc or decomPosing Eafier without
having the same completely covered with a good
and sufficient canvas cover. (Prior code $ 4110.0;
M.n2,g2nu,9t5)
4.08.010
4.08.020 Erccption.
It is cxpressly provided, howevec that the Provi-
sions of this chapter do not prcvent any Person ftom
plrcing such nurtrurt or fmilizer upon imy lot or
parccl of land within said San Mareo Comty as is
necessary for propedy fertili?ing such lot or parccl
of land (Prior code $ all0.l; Ord.272,A2,/0Ul9l5;
ffi.3113,06nd87)
(4.08) r
Sections:
{Chepter 4.1i0
IIToSQUITO CONTROL
Places where moquitoes being
bred dedared a public
nuisance.
Duty to abate nuisance.
Penalty for failure to abate.
4.12.010
imprisonment. (Prior code 0 412O.2; Ord- 198,
06/07/1905)
Sec'tions:
4.12.010
4.12.U20
4.XL030
4.1e010 Places rytere mosquitoes being
bred dedared a public nuisance.
All pools of water, or other places in which mos-
quitoes, are being b,rred are hercby declared to be
public nuisances. All Health Officers of ttrc County
and the Boards of Heal& of all cities and towns in
the County are hereby given authority, and it is
made their duty, upon the complaint, in writing, of
any rcsident of the County or Clty or Town, to
condenur, as nuisances, all such pools of water or
other places in which mosquitoes are being brd
and order the sumrnary abaternent thercof. (Prior
code $ 4l2O.O; Ord. 198, 06lUlll9OS)
4.12.V20 Duty to abate nuisance.
Upon being notified by such Health OffFrcers or
Boads of Health, of the existerrce of such pools of
water or other places in which mosquitoes are bre4
and &at tlre same has been declarcd a public nui-
sarrce by said Health OfEcers or Boards of Health,
it shall be the duty of the person or persons rcspon-
sible for the maintenance thereof to forthwith abate
such nuisance. (Prior code $ 4l2o.l; Ord. 198,
06/07/1905)
4.U.030 Penalty for failure to abate.
All persons refrrsing or neglecting to forthwith
abarc such nuisance as directed by said Health Otri-
cers or Boards of Health, shall be deerned gudty of
a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall
be fined not more than Fifty ($50.m) Dollars, or by
imprisonment in ttre County Jail for not more than
twenty-five (25) days, or by both such fine and
(4.12\ |
:
I
I
i
I
l
I
f
kcniscs hf€stcd. Cerrsin
rodents dcemed public
nuisancts.
Abatement thcrcof.
Inspection by commissioner.
Control end destrucion of
rodents
Sale of poisons for rodent
coDEOL
Pcnalty for lnterfering with
o6cial actirus.
Definitiors.
4.16.010
er said premises arc infected or infested with ro'
dents. (Prior code $ 4130.2; Ord. 461, 0804m')
4.l6.MO Control end destruction of
rodeDts.
The said commissioner shall have thc power and
authority to prcscribe the methods to be used to
eradicar€ or conEol or destoy said animal pests, to
employ the necessaDf labor for such work, and to
prescribe rules for the qualifrcatioo of any person
who enters his employment for said purposes, and
to enforce such rules which he may establish. (Prior
code ! 4130.3; Ord.46l, OE04.BT)
4.16.060 Penalty for interfering with
ofEcial actiom-
Every person who shall interfere with the official
actions under this chagter of the said commissioner,
his deputy, inspectors, and employees, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprison-
ment in the County jail not exceeding six months or
by a frne of not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars
($500.00) or both. (hior code $ 4130.5; Ord. 461,
0Erc/.B7)
4.l6.UO Definitions.
The following words and tenns as used in this
chaper shall be construed as follows:
(a) 'Commissionei'shall nrean the County Agn-
cultural Commissioner.
Sectioos
4.16mO
4.16.030
4.16.(X0
4.15.050
4.16.060
4.16.ffi0
4.16.010 Premises lnf€stci Certain rodents
deemed public nuisances.
Any and all premises in the County of San Mateo
infested with (l) ground squirrels, and/or (2) freld
mice (Muridac Spp) which arc infected with any
discase ransmissible to human beings are hercby
expressly declared to coastitute a public nuisance.
(hior code $ 4130.0; m. 461, 0804Ii7; Ord.
r0s8,05/18/54)
4.16.02ll Abat€me thet€of.
Whenever any such nuisancc shall exist within
tbe County of San Mateo, it shall be the duty of the
County Agriculoral Commissioner to cause said
nuisance to be at once abated by eradicating or by
controlling or by destroying said rcdens, and the
rcasonable expenses incurred tlprefore shall be a
County charge. (Prior code $ 4l3o.l; fr.,t61,
08/0447)
4.16.030 Inspectionbycommissioner.
It shall be the duty of said commissioner, when-
ever he shall deem it necessary, to cause an inspec-
tion to be made of any premises within the County
of San Mateo for the purpose of ascertaining wheth-
(4.16) l
Chept€r 416
RODENTS
4.16.050 Sale of poisons for rodent conro|.
Thi commissioner shall have the power and
authority to lrlanuf&hlre and sell poison barley and
such other rmterials as are convenient or necessary
in destroying ground squirrels or other rodents. All
such rn*edals shall be frrmished at cost to any
person upon satisfactory assurance to the said coft-
missioner that such rmterials are ro be used on
premiscs within tlrc Counry of San Mareo for the
purposc of controlling or destroying or eradicating
said animal pests. (Prior code $ 413O.4; Ord, 461,
oEtMBT)
i
I
I
4.16.010
7
4.16.fl0
(b) 'Ottcr rodents" shall include all gophers,
'ce and rats. (Prior code $ 4130.6; Ond- 461,
"tuB7)
(
(
(
(4.16) 2
f Ctapter {2l}
MILK REGT]II\TIONS
Definitions.
Standards erd Equiramcnts.
Perrnit required.
Application for pcrnit
fnspecton of premises
Issuance of permit
Suqrerion strd rcvocation of
permil
Duration of permit
Perrit to be po6ted.
MiIk distribution depot
Signs to be placrd on vehiclcs.
Protective cover-Pac&aging.
Encloced vehides.
Bulk milk dlspenser permit
Inspection fees. Processor.
Vdidity.
Repeals.
4.20.010
(e) 'Dafury Products Fermit" is the permit issued
to a prcccssor, rnanufacorer ot distributor of fluid
dairy products.
(0 'Fluid Dairy Producs" include milh seam,
homogeaizcd milh skim milk intetrd€d for human
consumption, chocolate milh chocolare dairy drink
and similar flavored drinks, buttermilk, otltred
buttermilk, milk shake and similar mixed drinks, ice
milk mir, ice cream mix, sour milh sour crearn,
when in fluid form.
(g) "Health Departneot'is the San Mateo Coun-
ty Departsnent of Health and Services.
(h) 'Health Directo/' is the Dircctor of the San
Mareo County Departnrnt of Heahh Services, or his
duly authorized agent,
(i) "IUa*et Milk" is milk which is supplied to
the consunrers in the natural fluid state, or prepared
for human consumption without being converted
into any otlrer form or product and conforms to the
standards provided therefor in chapter 3, division 4
of the Agrictltural Code.
0) 'Milk plant" is any place wherc market milh
crc:utr or other fluid dairy product is processed or
prepared for distribution.
(k) 'Milk disribution depot" is any place where
fluid dairy products are stored and kept for distribu-
tion; but shall not include a bonafide grocery store
making delivery of milk with other merchandise
purchased from such goc€ry slore.
(l) "Process", or any of is varians, includes
packaging, pasteurizing, manufacturing and any and
all other steps in the matrnent or preparation of a
dairy product or disribution.
(m) "Transportef is any person who transports
for hire a fluid dairy product for delivery in San
Mateo County, or which is intended for distribution
therein.
(n) "Sell" inclu&s "offer for sale", "expose for
sale", "have in possession for sale", exchange",
'trade" or 'iCistribute", or'tartef. (Prior code $
4lzt0.0: ffi. 1209,O3119157; Ord. 3113, Mll6/B7)
42O.Om Standardsandrequirements.
Except as otherwise provided io this chapter, it
Sections:
420.010
420.9m
420.030
4r0.0,1{)
420.09)
420.0fi
420.no
420.080
420.090
420.rm
420.110
420tn
420.130
4rO.lilt)
420.15{)
42fr.K4
420.170
(4.20) l
420-010 Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter certain words and
phrases are defined, and certain provisions shall be
construed as herein set out, unless it shall be appar-
ent from the content that a different meaning is
intended.
(a) 'Agriculnral Code" is divisioo IV, chapters
I to lO inclusive, of the Agriculnrral Code of the
State of California.
(b) talifornia Adminisrative Code" is subchap
ter I , chapter 2, title 3, of the California Administra-
tive Code of the State of California.
(c) 'Darry Farm" means any plrce or premises
on which milk is produced for sale or distribution
and where rnore than one cow or three goaa are in
lactation.
(d) "Dairy Farm Permit" is the permit issued to
a producer of milk as provided in this chapter.
4.20.420
shall bc unlawful for any person o poduce, pro-
:ess, sell or distributc any markct milk or other fluid
&iry prodrcts for hurnal consumptioq unless such
ptoducs conform lo rhe suDdards and rcquiremcnB
for rnarta milk q otbcr fluid dairy prcducas as
provid€d by the Agricrloral Code, Califomia AG
minisrativc Cod€, aod this chaper. Ia addition to
confonning to the stardards of the Agricultural
Code of the Starc ofCalifornia these products must
be pasteudzed. (Prio code g 414.1; Ord. 1209,
03n9t57)
420.GlO Pernitrequired-
Every milk produccr who operates a dairy farm
within the jurisdiction of San Marro Comty Milk
Inspection Service, and whose dairy farm is inspect-
ed by Sao Mateo County Milk Inspection Scrvice,
shall apply for and obtain a dairy farm pcnnit from
the Health Director, as hereinafter provided.
It shall be unlawful for any person to process, scll
or disaibute any rnarket milk or othcr fluid dairy
products in &e County of Sar Mateo wi6out first
having applied for and obtained a Dairy Produca
pcrmit ftom the Heal0r Director, as hereinafter
provided. (Prior code g 414O.2; M. lz@,
oyt9t57)
420.W Application for permit
An application for a Dairy Fann Permit or a
Dairy Products Permit shall be made iD writing to
the Health Departnent upon a form supplied by the
Heahh Drector and shdl designate tbc location of
the operations to.be p€donne4 the naore of such
operations and grve such other inforrnation as may
be required by said Health Director. (Prior code g
4ltt0.3r Ord. l2C9, 03119157)
420.050 Inspection of premises
Upon the filing of zuch applicuion, if premises
arc located in San Mateo County, the Health Direc-
tor shall inspect the prcmises rcferrcd to and their
imrnediate surroundingq together with the equip
ment, facilities and methods to be employed in
conducting the operation to which said application
pertains. (Prior code $ 414O.4; N. 1209, O3ll9l57)
4rfll)60 Issuence of permit
If the Health Director shall find that all thc provi-
sions of this chaptcr and the Agricularral Code
penaining to such applicant and such prcmises arc
complied with, and that cooditions of the premiscs,
equiprrent and facilities involved arc conpatible
with public hcalth, a permit shall be granred upon
payrnent of such fees as may be required by this
chaptcr. (Prior co& ! ala05; Ord. 1209, U3ll9l57)
420.VI0 Swpensioo and revocation of
permit
Such permit shall be granted only on the express
condition that the same shall be subjea to suspen-
sion or revocation, after prcper hearin& by the said
Health Dircctor for a violation by the holder theteof,
or any employec or agent of such holder, of any of
tbe provisions of this cbE tcr or of any rulc of the
Health Deparunent relaring o the inspeclion and
sanitary conditiotr of dairies, or upon proof of vioh-
tion by such holder of any laws of thc Starc of
California by providing for the standard and quality
of dairy products. (Prior code g 414O.6; Ord. 1209,
o3n9t57)
4.20.080 Duration of peruit
Such permit shall be valid until December 3l of
the calendar year in which it is issue4 unless it is
suspended or revoked as provided by this chapter,
or until the holder of such permit changes the loca-
tion of his placc of business, or shall cease operir-
tions for a period of five (5) consecurive days. (Pri-
or co& $ 4140.7; Ord. 1209, O3ll9l57)
420.090 Permit to be postd.
Every permit issued pursuant to the pmvisions of
this chapter shall be posted conspicuously at the
place of business named in such permit. (Prior code
$ 41!lo.8; ord. 1209, o3n9t57)
4.m.l.fit Milk distribution depol
Every person who operates a fluid milk distribu-
tion depot in San Mateo Coutty must maintain
adequate and efficient cold storage facilities rne-
chanically equipped and operated. Toilets, lavatories
(
(4.2O') 2
(
(
and lockers must be providcd. (Prior codc $ 4l'0.9;
tu. t209, 03119t57)
42t).110 Signs to be placed on veblcles.
Evcry person delivering fluid milk in the County
of San lvtatco shall have his trde narne legibly
placcd in lefiers not less ttan three (3) inchcs in
height and one-half (112) inch h width in a conspic-
uous plre on both outer sides of all vehicles uscd
by such pcrson for carrying mitk. (Prior code $
4ltlo.10; Ord. 1209, 03119157)
42i.Im ko&ctive covcr-PaclagiDg.
Alt fluid dairy products in glass containers shall
be sealed in a runner that will protect the Poudtrg
lip or such package from contamination. The cap or
cover used shall cover the pordng lip to at least its
largest diameter, shall mcrt the approval of the
Health Director, and shall be mechanically applied
at the time of packaging. The provisions of this
section will go into effect orn (l) year after the
adoption of this chaper. (Prior code $ 4l tl0.l 1; Ord.
1209, o3n9t57)
420.1{ Endosedvehicles.
All vehicles used for delivering or transporting
fluid dairy products shall be so enclosed as to pro.
tect such products from dircct sunlight and E aintain
the proper degree of rcfrigeratioo as required by
State law. The provisions of this section shall not be
effective until ooe yar aftrr the adoption of this
chapter. (Prior code $ 4l4o.l2; Ord. 1209,03119157)
42OJ4[) BuIk Eilk disFDser permlt
Every cstablishnent where a bulk milk disperser
is used shall apply for and obtain a bulk milk dis-
penscr permit from the Health Director. The bulk
milk dispenser must be kept in a sanitary condition,
and dispcnse a dairy product that complies with
legal standards. Violation of this secrion shall con-
stitute cause for suspension or revocation of said
permit. Said pcrmit shall be valid until revoked.
(Prior code $ 4lzl0.l3; ffi. 1209, O3ll9l57)
420.150 InspGctiorfecs.kocessor.
Thc processing inspection fees rcquirtd to be paid
by this section shall be due oa tbe first day of every
month for the preceding calendar monti. Said fees
arc as follows:
(a) Every prcc€ssor of lla*et milk under the
juridiction of the Hcalth Director shall pay the
Cotrnty of San Maao through the Milk Inspection
Sewice, Departncnt of Health &rvices, a fee iD an
amount equal to one mill per gallon of rnarket milk
received at the milk processing plant Such inspec-
tion fee shall be adjusted from tirne to time by the
Departnrnt of Health Services, wilh the apgoval of
the County Manager, in order that the rcvenues from
the fecs shall not exceed the acuml cost of making
the necessary inspections.
The above fee when paid shdl be accornpanied
by a report o{r a form provi&d by the Health Ser-
vices Departrrent signed by the rnanager or Frson
paying the fee setting forth the corect Dumber of
gallons of rnarket milk ptocessed during Oe month
which the fee is based.
@) Every processor of market milk who rcceives
milk from a Grade 'A" dairy inspected by tlrc
Health Departnrnt shall pay a dairy farm inspection
fee to the County of San Mateo, through the Milk
Inspection Service, Depanment of Health Services,
suffrcient to cover the cost of the dairy farm inspec-
tion. Said fee shall be fixed by the Health Officec
with the approval of the County Manager, and shall
not exceed the actual cost of such inspection service
as dercrmined by thc Health Offrcer.
(c) If any fee provided for in this section shall
not be paid within thirty (30) days after the sarne
shall beconp due ard payable as herein provided,
ten percent (lM) of the amount thereof shall be
added thercto as a penalty for nonpayment, and if
said fees arc not paid within sixty (5O) days after
becoming due, fifteen percent (1596) of the amormt
thercof shall be added thereto". (Prior code $
4li0.l4; Ord. 1209' 03119157 t Ord. l?97, O5t2Alfi;
Ord- 3113, Mtl6t87)
420.1@ Validity.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or
@.m)3
4.20.100
)
!
4.20-1fi
phrasc of this odinancc, is for any reason hcld to
'rc invalid or urrconstiotiooal, such invalidity or
rrnconstiotionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other portion of rhis 61di-
nance. (Prior codc $ 4140.19; M. 1209'03119157)
42O.l7O Repeats.
Hinanc€ 522 and anrendments thercto arc here-
by repealed. (Prior code g 41,10.20; Ord. 1209,
03n9ts7)
(
(
(
(4.2O) 4
4.48.010
l"Chapter 4.4t
ABATEMENT OF NT]ISANCES
Sections:
4.4&010 Arest$
4.4t.010 Arrests.
The Health Offtcer and his delegated subordi-
nates, pursuant to the provisions of section 836.5 of
the Penal Code of the Starc of Califomia may arrest
a person without a warrantwhenever he has rcason-
able causc to believe that the Person has cornmined
a mis&meanor in his preselrce which is a violation
of any ordinance, staNte, or taw, enforcement of
which is under ttre administration of the Health
Officer. Upon making such an arrest, the Health
Offrcer or his delegated subordinate may release the
pcrson arrcsted pusuant to section 853.6 of the
Penal Code of the State of California the provisions
of which are hercby adopted by reference as part of
this section. (Prior code $ 4308; Ord- 2153,
wnw2)
(4.48) I
Chapter 452
ENVIRONMENTAL EEAI;IE CODE
GENERALLY
Sections:
of Pnblic Health of the San Mateo Comty Depart-
ment of Health Services shall be responsible for the
enforcement of this code. The Dircctor of the Saor
Mateo County pepartmem of Health Services and
her designated representatives in said Environrcntal
Health section shell be refefied to her€iDafter as the
"County Health Officet''. (Prior code g 45M; Ord.
2413, 0llllllT ; Oid. 31 13, Mll6l87)
.152"050 Rules and rcgulatiotrs.
The County Health OfEccr is hereby empowered
to adopt and enforce reasonable rules and regula-
tions for the interprcanion and administration of the
provisions of this code, subject to the approval
thereof by the Board of Supervison. The Cornty
Health Officar shall" at least sixty (60) days pdor to
the effective dae of any rule or rcgulation, publish
at least once in a local newspaper of general circula-
tion in the County of San lvlateo a copy of the pro.
posed ntle or rcgulation, inviting public rcspotrs€
thereto. (Prior code g 4505; Ord. U.13, OUllTT)
45.LV|O Violations and penalties
.Any person, corporation, or entity violating any
of the provisions of this code or of the Rutes and
Regulations pursuant thereto shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor as providrd in
section 1.08.010 of the San Mateo County Ordi-
nance . Code. (Prior code g 4507; Ofi. 2413,
unln7')
452"010
4SLVn
4s,2.0{
4s,2.O4
4S2.OS0
452!m
45,2.070
fitle.
Prrrpoce.
Scope imd app[cation
Respondbfliily for enforcemenl
Rules and regulations
Severebiltty.
Violafions and pcnalties.
452"010 Title.
This pafi shall be known as the 'taviroarnenal
Health Co& of San Mateo County." This code will
be refened to hercinafter as "this code". (Prior code
g 4500; Otd" Ul3,0tnln7)
45,2$n Purpose.
The purpose of this code is to esablish standards
for restaurants, itin€ra restaurants, mobile food
vendors, caterers, food public fresh
urater sports arcas, water zupplies, wells, chemical
toileti and rodent and insect control compternentary
to'those imposed by the California HeaI6 and Safe-
ty Code and to the rules aod rcgulations promulgat-
ed thereunder by the Sate DepartuEEt of Health.
(Prior code $ 4501; Ord- Ul3, OUllm)
45.2.W ResponsibilityforeDforcemenl
The Environnrental Health section ofthe Division
(4.52) t
4.52.O1O
45.2.W Severabili$.
ff any provision of this code or tle application of
such provision to any person or in any circumstanc-
es shall be held invalid, the remainder of this code,
or the application of such provision to person or in
circumstances other than those as to which it is held
invali{ shall oot be affected thereby. (Prior code g
4506; Ord. 2,413, 0Vlln7)
45.2.On Scope and application.
The rcquircments imposed by this code shall
apply within the unincorporated area of the Cormty
of San Mateo and within those additional geograph-
ic areas in which the County Health Officer is ri-
sporsible by municipal ordinance incorporating the
provisions of this code and by contract for enforcing
Stale statutes, rules, and regulations. (Prior code $
4503; N. Ul3,Oulfi7)
Sections:
Ctapter 456
FOOD ESTABLISEMENTS
'testauranfl defined"
&Ittnerant rrstauranP defiDe.L
'tlobile food vendorf
il€fired-
'V€hidC d€fircil,
'hdostrial catedng vetichP
de6Ded.
&|Iialery product vehideP
d€6ned.
lllloHle food prcpalation
ude riefircd.
t'Csterer, de6ne.L
'Food equipmenP defircd,
'Yendng macfiineP dcfin€d.
Approval by county helth
ofEcer.
Submissiot of ptans to county
hcalth officer.
nincrmt
resteurents-IrcafioL
Itincraut restaurairts-
Sutmtgou of plan to county
health otrcer.
Idrarant
re.ta[rants-hqlc(fiotr ad
defermiDafioD.
Itineraut
restaurants-Duratftn
Mobrlc food vendors-Displa5r
of name anil odeess
Mobr'te food
Requircments for food serred.
Mohile food
vendor*Restric{ioD of food
sewed.
Mobile food vendors-
C.ondition of vehiclc and
s[PP[es.
Mobih food
vendors-Permul dcanliness
Mobile food
vendors-kotcction of food
and utcosils.
IDdusfriel cetoriry veliiclcs
Bakery product vehfdcs.
Mobile ftiod vendor dmation-
Ilxed position
Moblle food veNldors{}uty to
maintain location h $nitary
conditioD.
MoHle food vmdors-Tofl et.
frcflfies.
Cateren*-Roquirements for
prepration
Catcrer*Tlansportation of
fooal
Catcner-kohibition
regarding crilrndg
Cetercrs-I'enlrcrature for
pcrishable foods.
Wrappin6 boring, datir& and
labciliDS on premises of
prqnntion
Dating and labdliltg
rcquiremeots for sandwiches
and box luue.hes. .
Conmmption date.
Sadwich€s arrl box lunchc
ercmpt from rcqoircm€Dts.
Consum$ion date anil codc
datiog of exempt catogorics of
setrdwic.hcs and bor lunchec
Datirg of foods futcndcd to be
heatcd.
Lcgibility of date-
Re-use.
Vending maclines-.rScope anil
application-
456200
456210
456.Xn
4l,623t0
45i62,4o
45,6290
45,626A
4562:t0
4s6zffi
4l,6290
4563)0
456.3r0
45,6320
456330
45,6.W
456350
456360
45,6370
456380
4.56.90
456;.m0
4.56.010
4sfuoz0
4s6.(E0
4.56.(X0
4-56.050
456.060
456.W0
456.0E0
456.090
4l,6.tN
456.110
456.130
456.1&
456.1s0
456.160
45,6.t70
456.180
4S6.Ur0
(4.s6) I
4l,6.Xn
456410
45,6,,in
456.{30
4l,6,J/,o
45,6430
45,&60
4l,6.4ilO
V€Dditrg mn.hin+lnlrectioD-
Ycnding machine-
Advertisemcnt of opcrdion.
Food equipment-iStandards
Food equipmelt-Compliance
with standarils
Food equipment-Dase of
rnrintcnmce.
Food equipment-Plans
Food equipment-Approvd by
county health officer.
G) operators of restauraDts, itinerant restaurans,
and caterers. (Prior code 5 4522; Otd. ?A13,
ovttn7t,
456.040 'ryehicld defircd"
The term'{vehicle" shall have the satrE meaning
as thaa alefined in seaion 28524. of tte Califomia
Health and Safdy Code. Said term shall include
industial caering vehicles, bakery prodrct vehicles,
and mobile food prepatioo units. (hior code g
4523; Orrd. 21.13, OVfin1)
456.050 "hdostrlalcderingvehicleP
rlefircd.
Thc &rm lndutial carring vehicle" shall in-
clude all vehicles ftom which arc sold inrnt.lirtely
edible food and poable drink which has,been pre-
pared and sealod or packagcd in a licensed food
establishrncnt (Prior codc E 45U; M. ?-4.13,
ovttnT)
456Jm fBalgry product vehlde'
deErcd-
The tcrm 'bakery pro&rct vehicle" shell include
all vehicl,cs by which lakery products are transport-
ed and Aom which bakery $oducts are dis*ibuted
or sold, but shall not include vehicles used to deliv-
er such prodrrcts to retail or wholasale food estab-.
lishrnents for resale. (Prior code g 45 25; Ord. ?A13,
outtm)
4.X.U10 'Mobile food preparation uuif'
deEDc&
The term 'hobile food pr€,pamtion tmit" shall
include all ve.hicles in whirch food poducts are
prepard, cooked, padraged, processd or appor-
tioned for distributioo, sale, or service. (Prior code
$ 4526; Orrd. 2413, Olnln7)
456.1180 'Catrrer, defiDed"
The term *catelef shall refer to atry persqr,
corporation, or entity whic\ for profit, transports
and serves, or provides for service by another, at a
place other thrn the business location of such per-
son, corporation, or entiqr, any foo4 whether an
rL56Jtl0 &Restauranf definerl
Thc t€rm 'tresauram" rhall have the sare
Dcaning as lhat d€fued in section ?,€522 of ttc,.
Califomia Healtr and Safety Code and in section
5.64.05O of thc San Mareo C.ounty dinmcc Code
(Prior mde ! 4520; Ord UlS,OUllnT)
45&tm 4ltlnerantrestauranPdefined.
Thc tcn['itineraht rEstaurant' shall bave the
sa rc€ning 35 ,hat {g6tr€d in section ?3523 of
he Califorda HeaIfr and Safety Code, but shall not
irclude nrohile food vcndcs, as hercfuafter defined.
(Pdorco& 0 4521; fr" Ul3,Olfilm)
456.030 'lMobile food vendorsP defined.
Tbe tcrm "mobile food veribf shalt. inclu& all
person$ coryorations, or entities which sell food or
food products at. r€tail to the public either from
vehichs, u ftom maaually mobile co'rtrincrs. Said
term shall include, but not be limit€d to lhe follow-
ing:
(a) indstial catering vehicles;
(b) balrery product vehicles; and
(c) mobile food Feparari$ units.
Said t€rm shall not inchde 0rc following:
(d) disttibutors of rnilt delivering products to
regulr customers;
(e) disribmorc of food or food produas deliver-
ing srch produqts o either retail or wholesale es-
tablishrnents for rcsale;
(f) distributon of produce or shell eggs;
(4.s6) 2
4.56.080
entire Eeal or c(xute thereof. (Prior c& $ a5n;
Otd.Ul3,OUIl/lf)
4561190 'Tood equipmeoP defirc.L
The term 'food equiprenf' *hell include all
machincry and equipm€nt used to 1neparc, process;
cook, he+ chi[, serve, or store atry food or food
,product Said. t€rm shall not inchdc vending ma-
,chincs as hereinafter defmed. @ic co& ! .4528-
M.U.t3,Otntm)
,L56.100'iyendingmachfod'.te6ned.
The t€n,r "veDding rnachine" shall have tte same
" meaing as that defmed in seaion ?35?5 of t}r,,
Califcaia Health aDd Safety Code and in section
5.64.Gt0 (s) of the Sm Maeo Coudty frinance
Code, (Pdor code S 4529; Orrd" U*3, OlntnT)
455.110 Approval by ounty heatth
officer. '
It shell be uolawful. for aay person to constuct,
altcr, or repair any rcstauratrt, itinerant'rcstaurant, c
othcr food establishment for whosc constnrction,
alteration, or rcpair a building permit is necessary
until such person has received in writing from the
e.ouoty llealth Officer an approval stitihg that the
plans aod specifications for srch proposed con-
stnraion, alteratio, or repair coofum with Surc
health laws dnd reguluions and this code. (Prior
code $ 4530; N.Ull,OUlnT
4fiJJm Submision of plaus to county
. healtt offi<$r.: Upon applicarion o rte Cornty BuiHing Official
for a building permit to authorize tte constmction,. alteration, or repair of a resaurant, itinerant re.stau-
rant, or other food establishment, the owDer or oper-
ator of such Estaurant, itinerant restauraot, or o{her
food establishment shall also submit to tte County
Health Officer tbe plans and specificarions for srrch
alteration, or rcpaif :as well as any
.. other information rcque$ed by lhe County Heal8t
Officer. The County HeaI& Officer <hell withh ten
(10) days following the receip of suCh plans, speci-
fications, and other infonmarion, determine whether
the proposed constnrction, alterarion, or rcpair com-
plies with the Stale heafth laws and ttis code and
shall either apprcve or reject such proposed con
stuaiom, alteraion, or rrepair. A copy of the llealth
Officer's deEnoinatioD shalt upo completioq in
every case be forwrded to tte Building Officiat.
(Prior code S 4531; Orrd. AlS,Olnlm)
456,130 Itinerant teetamants-Lri:atioa-
No itinerant rcstanrant shall 6rpr6x3116 excep in a
location approved h wtiting by fte County lleahb
Officer. No locatim shall br appro"ed unless it is
either on tbe site of ri temporary event, such as a
camival, fe*ival circus, or otter attraction, or on
public property, where tho public entity ovning.srrch
property has conseoed O tte prre.serc of tbe itiaer.
ant res*aurant" (Prim co& 0 4540; O!d. -%1a, '
ovtvm
5rGl.tUt ItiD€rart rcstaorarts-
Submfuion of plsn to couty
hcrilth officcr.
To obtiin the agroval required in section
4.56.130 hereinabove, the owner or olrerator of an
itinerant re.staurant shall submit !o the county
Health Officcr plans deaiting the proposed location
of the itinerant r€stauralrt, a list of tte foods aod
food products to be. scrve4 a descripion of .fu
facilities and food csipment of said itinerant.rcs-
taurant, and such other information as the County
Health Officcr E8y nlquesl (Prior code g a5a1;
Ord. Zl3, Oln1//7)
455.150 Itinerant rcstauranh-Inspection
and deteimination
Upon receipt of tbe ,rat- required of the owtter or
operator of an itiDeratrt rcstaurant rder section
456.140 bereinabove, the Comty llealth Officer
shall inspea both the pmpored location,and the
itirerant rc.staurant itself. TIE County Itrealth Officer
rnay thereafter alprove or demy the poposed loca-
tion or may approve it conditionally upon the
owner's or operator's resticting prepararion and
sewice of foods and food poducts to those det€r-
mined to be appropriate to the facilities of the iriner-
(456) 3
4.56.150
rt rcstarrant (Prior code I 4542; M. 24.13,
,uttm)
45616o Itinerant resfaurants-Duratior.
No itin€rant restaura shall operate io any loca-
tion for morc than ftfteea (15) days in a single
calendar year unless it complies with state health
laws and rcgulations and thc p,rovisions of this code
concenring restaurants. (Prior code S 4543; Ord.
u.t3,otnn1)
A56"'tlO Moblle food venilors-Iliq ay of
name and address
Evcry mobile food veodor shall . cause to be
pgintcd upo each vehicle his name and address.
Such infornation shall be inscdbed iD block l€dters
at leasJ thrre (3) inches higb md t*,o (2) ioches
wida (Prior codc $ 455q Ord" 2413, OVrun>
456.180 Moblle food ve.ndors-
Rcquircmcnts for food scrved.
Mobilc food vendors shall not sell or serve any
md or food product unless it meets rhe following
-equfucmcnts.
, (a) No prcpared food or food pro&rct shall be
sold or served ude.ss it has been prepared in food
establishrrcnts v&ich may lawftlly frepare or com-
pound such foods ad wtich coryly wift Sare
bealth laws and regulations and this code.
@) No packaged food or food prcerct sha[ be
sold or served uniess it has be€n packaged-or
vrapped in a food establishrpnt which may lawfrrl-
ly package or wrap such foods or food prcducts md
which complies with St re health laws and regula-
tions and ltis code.
(c) No food shall be preparcd exc€pt in Dobile
food prrepaation units and in accordoce with statc
health Laws ad regulatims thdrefore md wilt this
code, uoless specific wriueo consent for such prcpa-
ration has bccn otrtained from the County Health
Officer. (Eior code $ 455f ; Cd 2413, OUllm)
456.1!10 Mobilefoodvendor*Resficfion
of food 6(rved.
The County Health Officer may rEstsict to c€rtain
tnes the fmd and food products which a mobile
food vendor rnay sell or serve where the County
Health Officcr dctermincs that 6c facilities of the
mobile food veudor's vehicle are inadcquatc o sell
or serve safely other foods or food products, (Prior
code $ 4552; M'Ul3,0uln7)
411690/0 Mobilefoodvendors-Condition' of vehicle atrd supplies.
Every mobile food vendc shall maiDtain his
vehicles and store his supplies in a clean, healthfrtl,
sanitary rnanner. (Prior code $ 4553; Orrd- 2413,
ovttnT
456'210 Moblle food vendors4crsonat
cfeanliness. .
Every food veodor, eryloyec tharof, or operaior
of a raobile food vending vehicle <hall, when seri-
ing or handling food or food products, &ess in clear
drtcr gErrEDts and keep his person clean- (Prior
code I 4554; M- 2413, OUI!//T)
4lr6.Zm Mobilefoodvendors4rotccfion
of food and.ileosils
All food and food Foducts offered and all uten-
sils used.by a rnobile food vcndorr shufl be p,rotected
from dirt, vermin, ad other uosanitary influences.
Single scrvice containen sh4ll be used fm all fgod
aDd food Fodqcts, unless some other maaner of
service has been anthorized by the C.ornty Hedlth
Officer. Mobile food vendors shall not display any
food or food product exceF in or on the rnobile
food vending veticle. (Priu code g 4555; Ord"
24t3,0vnm)
4.56J3/D Industui.al catering vehides.
In addition to those for rnoble food vending
vehicleq industriat catering vehicles shall also nreet
the following requiremeots:.
(a) the interiors of all comparheots used for
food or f<ild products shall be constnrcted:in sucb
manner as both to be easily,washable and to with-
stand repeated washing;
(b) all food and food prodrcr storage and display
comparhents shall have tightly fitted doors ftee
(4.s6) 4
ftom cracks which might admit or har$or verrnin.
Such colryartnrents shall protcct food and food
products ftom extemal oontanination. (Prior code
g 4556; Ord. Ul3,0Ut],n7)
4K2q Bakery product vehides.
In addition to the rcqufuemebts fc mohile food
vending vehicles and those in section 4.56.230 brE-
ilabove for industdal catedng vehicles, balrery
pro&rct vehicle.s shalt atso tret tte rcqufuements
that no fruit, vegeoble, 'rreat, nsb, or other food
shall bc transporEd in any bakcry product vehicle
unlcss $ch food is isolarcd in a coryrrent espe-
cially costructed therefor ftom all bakery products.
(Ptior crido g a557; @. 2413, oulllm
4fi2fl Moblle food vcndor
dorationJixed. pcition.
No mobile food vendor sball pcrmh his vchicle
ci6er to rEnain iD any me locatim fo the purpose
of salc'or display of fcbd or food products for more
than 6irty (30) minutes during my four (4) hon
perio4 or to rehlm to the sam location withiu any
four (4) hour period. Any mdile food vcDding
vebicle which fails to move d leas five hundrcd
(500) fect ftom it prior locatio within any fqr (4)
hor period shall be deerned in fixed positioo Mo-
bile food vending vehictes in fixed position shall
comply with Stde health laws and regulatioos and
the provisions of this code conceming restaurants.
(Prior code $ 4558; OrrL 2/413, OUllnT)
456,260 Mobile food veodors-Duty to
maintain iocation in saDttary
condition.
While any rrobile food vending vehicle is in any
locarion, the mobile food vendor shall have the duty
to keep such location in a neat atrd orderly condi-
tion. He shall pick up and diryose of in a sanitary
maancr all paper, liter, garbage, and otter refrrse
resulting from his prcsetrce md activities. (Pric
code 0 4559; M.Ul\,Olltffm
4.56230
4S,5.li10 Mobile food vendors-Toilet
fadfities;
No mobile food vendor shall operafie looger.rll,n
thirty (30) mimrtes in a single locatio unless de.
quate toilet facilitics exist conve,nicntly necb5r
providcd 6at the C-:ornE Healtb Officer may ar-
thorizc operation in individual cases fa such longer
periods as h deems advimble. @ior code g 45595;
M.Ut3,Outln7)
45,6JIN Catorer-Requircments for
prcporadon.
All. food scrved by a caercr shall be peparcd in
an esabliShment which conforms with the requir,e-
ments iqosed upm rrstaurarts both by scclim
?3524 a seq. of the Catifomia Inealth and Safety
Code md by regrilatiors 1nCIungded pursaot
ttereto whe&er or nc srch es$lishneot constiuEc
a .ttsffiane thercmder. (Prior codc S 455q Ord,
24t3,OUIrr,7)
4.fiZln Ccferere--.Transportationof .
food.
Catq€rs shalt traosport food only if packagEd iD
dust-proof co&iners and conveyed in vehicles in a
clean coodition (Prior code S 4561; Ord" Zl3,
outfi7)
4563(X) Catcrers-hohibifion regar{ing
initmfs.
No live animals may be aanslnrted in rny vehi-
cle used by a cacrEr to trmsport food. (Prior mde
$ 4564 Od- Ut3,OtnvTT)
456310 Caterers-Temperature for
pertftable foods"
Carerers shall rnaintain a temperatrrc for perish
able food of 45T or below q 140"F or above, as
?pgopriare, uotil such foods are served. (Prior code
$ 4563; ff" 2413,Oll,1m)
45,5.3m Wrapping, boxing datin& and
tsHlitrg on premisee of
preparatiotr
Every sandwich, other than those included within
(456) s
456320
x hrnches, od box hrrh in&nded for sale, gift,
ur distributio to the grblic at a place othef, than oD
ttc prcmisis *tere prepared shatl be securely boxed
q wramc4 aod labclled and darcd in the establi#
ilent rfurc it is pneparcd" (ftior code ! 457Q Ord-
at\otmn1\
4.563:t0 Datug md lab€[itrg
. requimments for sandwicles and
box tunch- es.
The nr4pr for every sandwich---o&er rhen
those iuchdcd in box hmchcs--and cantaim for
evcry box huch intcndcd for sale, gift, or dstibu-
tion to thc poblic shaU bear b pdnt thcceon bo6 lhc
phrasc, Tay Preparcd fofl ir Eix (6) Point, botd
fec€, upp€r case letters or larger and also the day of
thc wcc& o whir:h soch sandwich or box lrmch cas
inended to be consum4 and fu nam,, and addrcss
of tte establishment whic.h ptc,pared such smdwich
or box hrnch" in tcn (10) point, botd face, upper
case lettcrs c larger. It is snrffcient fc purposcs of
this seaion to pdut'SU; Mq T{J, WE TII FR,
A- oo such sandwich q box luqch, desi$atiog tbe
aay ofinteoded consumpion by punching, perforat-
ing, or ofurwise marking in a fashio acccptabb to
the County Ilealth Officer the appropriate initials.
(Prior co& S 4571; Oril Ul\OUlUn)
4563{0 Consrmption date-
No sandwich or box lunch shall be madc avail-
able fc cosrraptiou by the prblic more tlan 24
hours after lte time th.t such sfldwich o box lunch
has been lrEearc4 cxcept as provided otherwise
hereinbeloq'. (Prior code 5 4572;. & Ull,
unvm
456350 Sandwiches and box lunchcs
exemlt hom requiremcgtsi
The following sandwiches aod box lurcbes are
exempt from the requiremeots of sections 4563yJ
and 456340:
(a) Smdwichas or box luDches kept neftigerated
at a teqperanrc of 45oF or below in a fteeaer or
storage locker---other than a vending ma-
.:hineJocarcd at a 6red plac€, from whence such
sandwiches or box lunches arc sol4 given, or dis-
tributed to the public.
(b) Sandwiches or box lunches kePt in and dis-
pensed fiom vending machines with proper reftig-
eration facilities which rnainain a temperaturc of
45oF or below. (kior code I 4573t M. 2,413,
outrm)
456.361) C.ongumption ilate and code
dating of exempt cetegories of
. sandwiches and box luches.
Sandwiches and box hmches oftte cat6gories dc-
scribed in seaion 4.56.350 shalt be prepared and
madc availablc for consuqptioo by thc public oly
for such lcnglt of rime as tte Cotng Itrealth Officer
shall approve by rule or reguLrtion. illl such sand-
wichcs and box hmche,s shdt bear in a code ap
proved by thc County llcatt Qffcer the darc by
which slch saDdwich mrs cithcr be con$med or
destroyed. (Prior code I 45741 M. 2413, Olnlfm
45f.370 Ming of foods ttrt ded to be
heated-
Packaged foods such as mrt pies" stews, T.V.
dinners, and tb like whiih arc inteo&d to be beat-
ed aod sold hot from in&rstial carcring vehicles
shall bear ia a iranrer approved by the Cornty
Ilealth officer the date by which nrch foods are to
be cmsumed (Prior code $ 4575; Orrd. 2413,
ovttm
4J6380 leglbility of date.
Every sandwicb, box tmch, and other food to
which this chapter applies shall bear only a single
consurytioo date, which datc shall at dl tims be
maintaind legible. (Prior code $ 4576; Orrd. 2413,
outtm)
(4.s6) 6
456390 Re-use.
No sandwicb. box lunch, or ot er food to which
this chapter applies shall, oncc having beeo op€ne4
be rewrapped or rcboxed ard offered o the public.
(kior code $ 4577; Ont Ul3,OlnUm
456".ili00 Vendingrnaeirines--'Sr"opeand
alrplication
The provisions of this chapter sha[, unless otter-
wise indicat€4 apply only to ttoEe veoding na-
chines which ei&er dispease rcadily perishable food
or which combine or compound butk food ing€di-
ents into unit servings for distribution in single
s€rvice 'containers. Ihe p,ovisioas of ttis chapter
shall not, unless othcrwise indicdc4 apply to veo&.
ing machines which dispense, exclusively, bctled
ddnks, gun, candy, or o(her iterns fomd by the
County llealth Officer not o be readily perishahle.
(Priorcode S 4580; ff- Ul3,OUfifm
4516l10 Vcnding dinesJrspatron
Tbe Couty HeaXh Officer may inspcct any vea6.
ing rnachine O which ttis chapter applies to detrr-
rinine whether it confqms with ttc Eovisions tere-
of. In coneaion with such inspeaion,tbe Cotrty
Ilealth Officer may require the owner or operaor bf
a veading machine or tteir rcpresentmives to accom-
paoy him on such inspection. @ior code $ 4581;
M.Ut3,OUlm)
4.SG/Ofi Vending machfues-
&tvertisemeut of oper.tion.
.Every Vending mechine or, where several owaed
or operated by rhe same perso4 firm, or co{poration
ae locared contiguursly, group thereof shall bear
conspicuously in two inch (2") btock letrers the
namA addre,ss, ud Elephone number of the operator
thcreof. @ior code g 4582; Ord. Ul3, Olntm)
4.fi.43tt1 Food equipment-Standards.
The County Health Officcr shall adopt rules and
regulaions setting stamdards for d.srgn and sania-
tioo of food equigrcnt Such stardads shall inaor-
porate appropdate national norms for srch eq.,,1-+
mqt. (Prior code $ 4590; fr- Ul3, OVfim)
45,&q Food cquipment-{-omplia*-
witr staralerils.
No persorl firm, or coryoration shall imtall or
mate use of newly iostalled food equipment unless
such food equiprrcnt coDplies with fhe standards
4-56.M
thercfor set by the nrles and regulations of the
County Health Officer. (Prior code g 4591; OnL
ut3,outtnT)
455.,1ti0 Food equipmeut-{ase d
maintenancc.
No person, fina o corporatio shetl iagtall 61
m& use of newly instalted food equipDeot udess
tbe proposcd q acEal locatioa of such cquipment
atlows easy cleaniag and maintcnance bott of it and
of the surromding area (Ptior code g 4592; Ord.
2413,orfltm)
45,G46iD Food equlpment-Plans.
\f,here aoy pcrsom, fir4 c coryomrion inteods
to coostsuct, remodel, or install food equipni:at in
a restartta or other food establishrnent or in an
itincrant resarrant, he shall" prior to such coosuc-
tioo, reoodeling; c insall,ation, sbmit to 6e Corn-
ty Heattt Officer for his approval the following
data:
(a) Two cqries of a scale drawing showing thc
goposed os actual location of the food equipoent
to be cotrstsucte4 remodeld or installe4 along
with tbe location of floor drains and sinks.
(b) Two copies of srrch specificarims, forms, data
sheets, drawiags, and sketches as arc Dece.ssary to
show lhat the desip, matedds, ad raethods of
constsuction, remodeling, or imallation of the food
equip,rocnt meet witt the saodards irryosed by lhis
ch4ter and by onhcr applicable laws and reguta-
tions. (Prior codc $ 45.93; Ord: 2413, Olnlfm
456.470 FoodeqniFment-Approvalty
county health officer.
No persoo, firm, or corporatiotr may prcceed to
construct, remodel u install any food equbro.rtrt
until tte plans therefore have been approved by the
County Ilealth Officcr. (Prio code g 4594; Orila.B,autltll)
(4.s6) 7
I
Chapter 4.6i0
PUBLIC ERESH WATER SPORTS AREAS
Sections:
4.60.0r0 '?ublic hesh watcr qrorts
erea" defrrcd.
'Public fresh wat€r sports
ectivitied' defircd.
Euvironmental survey.
Conditions rendering ereas
urfit for use.
Iliscased penn ns.
Oonng ad posting.
hspeclion fees
Registratioo.
4.fi.0m
dcems neccssary, condrct an cnviro nental survey
of particular ftesh water spqrs areas and any
str,eams, channek, drains, and thc like appurtenant
thereto. Thc purposc of srcb survcy shall bc to
investigarc the prcsence of hazardous clrmicals,
hannful aquatic organisms, anirnal wasrcs, and other
clenreats immediately or cumulativcly dclererious io
hurnan health, and of sewage discharges, wecd
growths, alge bloomX fecal coliform bac-teriological
counts, and other conditions. (Prior code I 46lQ
M.Ur3,OU|W)
4.60.040 Conditions rendering ercas unfit
for use-
No public fresh warct spons alea shalt be used
for public ftesh watcr sports activities whete the
County Health Officer determines that either:
(1) therc is a fecal coliform count of morc than
200 organisms per 100 ml. in twenty percent (20%)
or more of the water samples aken from any sample
station, and evidence of human fecal contamination
exis6; or
(2) sewage discharges posing a sigrificant danger
of contamination exist in the immediate vicinity of
the public ft,esh water sports arcq or
(3) any other conditions or elemens rendering
the public fresh watcr sports area unfit for public
ftesh water spors activities have been denronstratcd
to exist by the environmental survey. (Prior code $
462O; &d.2413, OUIITT)
4.60.050 lIseased persors
No person afflicted with any communicable dis-
ease shall either be employed at or granted use of
public frcsh water sports areas for so long as he is
so afflicted. Either the County Health Officer, the
owner or the operator of the public fresh water
sports arc:r may require any person suspected of
such affliction to prcsent a writt€n statement by a
physician declaring that such person is free from
communicable disease- The County Health Oficer
may rcquire aditional documentation by the physi
cian where he dercrmines the written statement to
be incomplete. (Prior code g a62I; Ord. 2413,
out1/77)
4.60.030
460.0.()
4.6().t)50
4.60.060
4.@.t70
4.60.08{'
4.60.010 '?ublic fresh water sports area'
deEned.
Th€ term 'public fresh water sports area" shall
rneatr any body of ftesh water, including portions
thereof, whether owned and operated by a public
entity or by a private person, firm or co4rcration. to
which rnembers of the public are invircd, upon the
paytEnt of admission or aot, for public fresh water
sports activities. Included u/ithin said term are riv-
ers, cr€eks, lakes, ponds, and lagoons excluded from
the scope of ocean water sport rcgulations. (Prior
code $ 4600; tu. 2413, OUIU7?)
4.A.gm 'hrblic fresh wat r sports
activitieC' defmed.
The tcrm "public fresh water sports activities"
shall mean any activity of a rccreational nature
involving imrnediate physical contact between the
human body and water in a public ftesh water spons
area Said term shdl include wading,
paddle boarding, skin diving, and watq skiing
among other activities, but shall exclude boating and
fishing. (Prior code S tl@l; Ord. U.13, OUllnT)
4.60.030 Environmental survey.
The County Health Offrcer shall, as often as he
(4-@) I
4.60.010 I
'i
i
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
i
4,60.060
4.60.060 Clodngand@ing.
Wherc he dclermines any ptblic frcsh water
sports arca to be unfit for use within the rreaning of
section 4.60.00, hercinabove, tbe County Health
Officer oay, io his discraioru require it to close
cntircly or uuy resria its usc and Eay Post, or
causc the owDer or operator to post, conspicuous
waming signs announcing is closing or restriction
of usc. (Prior co& I 4622; Ord Ul3,0Ullm')
4.60.0?0 bspectioa fees.
The owner ofevery public ftesh water sports ar€a
shall be liable to pay annually an inspection fcc of
$100 to rcimburse the Cornty Health Officer for his
costs in enforcing the health requirernents in this
chapter. (Prior code $ a68; Ord. ?5l4,05n0ng)
4.60.(80 Rcgiskation.
Every owner or o,peratc of a public fresh watcr
sports arca shall regisar the fact of such ownership
or operation with thc county Health officer. Each
owner and operator of an existing prblic fresh watcr
sports area shall register it within six (6) months of
the enactrcnt of this section. Every owner and
operaor of a fresh watcr sporB area which com-
rucaccs operation at any tirDe following the en*t-
rneat of this section shall registcr it within thirty
(3O) days of srrh comrnencement of opention.
(Prior code $ 4624; Ord. 2514,06D0n8)
(4.@\ 2
(
(
(
r Gaptcr 4.64
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
*Yl,ater supply sy$emt'
defirc
ollleafth to".d" U*or.
'Sanitary ddectsP defid.
Standerds for watcr for
domestic use.
kohibition of health hazards
aad saritary def,ec'ls
Corrcc{ion of hcafth hazards
and sanilary ddects
Disinfection of water mains.
Direction to chlorinatc or
didnl'c(t
Dosage for chenicat
disinfection.
D,ocage for cblorinatiou.
4.64.010
supply, or allow it to bc contaminated or pollutcd.
(Prior code $ .1552; Ord. 2413, OUIW)
4.4.W Stsndards for water for domcstic
lls'g.
Every person, finn, or corporation which eithet
owns or operates a water supply sysrcm in whole or
in part shall srpply water therefrom ftee from con-
amination and pollution, in conpliance with the
drinking warer standards set by thc National Primary
Drinking Warcr Regulations publiskd by the Unitcd
Staes Environrpntal Protection Agency. (Prior code
$ ,t660; Ord. 2411,0il1l//7)
4.4L050 hohibition of health h^r-rdc ard
sanitary ddects.
Every donrstic water supply system shall be con-
structed and maintained free from health hazards
and sanitary defects. (Prior code ! 4661; fr. 24f 3,
outtm)
4'64'060 Correction of heahh hazarre and
sanltar5r defects-
Where the County Hqlth Officer determines a
hedth hazard or sanitary defect to exist, he rnay
order the owner or operaror of the water supply
system in which such bazard or defect occurs to
take whatever stcps are deemed necessary by the
County Health Officer to insure the safety of the
water supply and the protection ofthe public health.
Every person, fimU aad corporation to which such
order is directed shall imnr-diately comply there-
with. (Priot code I 4662; Ord. 2413, OUllm)
4.4.ffiO Disinfection of water mains.
No person, firnl or corporation shall use any
newly constucted water main or newly repaired
section of an existing water main to supply warcr
unless said person, frm, or corporation has disin-
fected it in accordance either with Standards C-60 I -
68 of the Anprican Waterworks Association or with
an equivalent procedure approved by the County
Health Officer. Said new or repaired main shall be
flushed thoroughly before and after chlorination.
(Prior code $ ,1663; Ord. 2413, oUlW)
Sections:
4.64.010
4.A.tm
4.64-030
4.64.M0
4.64-050
4.64.060
4.4.U0
4.6t 080
4.64.090
4.41.100
4.64.010'Tyatcrsupplysystem'defined.
Tbe term 'Vater supply systcm ' shall include all
works, facilities, and the like designe4 constrrrcte4
or employed to collect, store, treat, or distribute
water intended for donrestic usc by 20O or fewer
custonrers. (Prior code ! 4650; fr- 24l3,OVlln7)
4.U.Vm "Ilealth hazard" defined-
The term "health hazard" nreans any conditioo or
preticc connected with the provision of water for
domestic use which poses significant danger to the
health of any water consurlcr- Said term includes,
but is not lirnited to, dangers to health posed by
sanitary defecs. (Prior code $ tl65l: Ord. 2413,
0u1w)
4.64.030'lsadtaryddectt''deEr€d.
Tlrc t€rm "sanitary defect" mcans any faulty
condition, whether of location, design or construc-
tion of collection facilities, EeafiEnt works, or
distribution wor*s, which may regularly or occasion-
ally prevent satisfetory purification of the water
(4.s) t
4.64.080
4.64.1[0 Direction to c]lorinate or
disinfect
Every perron, firrn, or corpofirtion which either
owns or operatcs in whole or in part a water supply
system shall, at the direction of the Comty Health
Officeq cause to be cleansed and chlorinatcd or
chemically disinfccted any rcserrroir, tanh well"
spring, or plpe from which water is dispensed eitbr
for donp;stic use or human consumption. (Prior code
$ 4670; Ord. 2413, OUIWT)
4.il.Un Doeage for clemical disinfection
When the purity of water in a water supply sys-
tem is maintained by rneans of chemical disinfec-
tion, the dosage or nttes of application shall at dl
time be sufficient to provide adequaiely disinfected
water at all points of ttre distributioo system. The
County Health Officer rnay order continuous auto-
matic disinfection for any water srpply, when, in his
opinioq such treatment is necessary for the protec-
tion of the public hedth. (Prior code $ tt67l; Ord.
24t3,Ovttn7)
d64.100 Dmage for c.hlorination.
When the purity of water supply system is main-
tained by means of continuous chlorination, the
chlorine shall be added in sufficient quantity to
insure tlrc bacteriological safety of the water at all
points in ttrc distribution system- A free chlorine
residual shall be maintafurcd at all tirnes at chlorine
contol sampling points approved by the County
Health Officer. (Prior code $ 4672: N. ?A13,
outfi7)
(
(
(4.@) 2
t
t
I
i
I
r Cteptcr 468
VYELI,S*
Inteot
Defiridos
Gcuerrl standerds.
\treldritrer.
Mttigafrol ol disturboucc at
vdl sitc.
Sfefe rtgulati,ons.
Fccs
PcrEit for the constmctiolrr
dcstuctio& lnectivetion,
relnir or onvendon of a
wetcr well, geothcrmel hcat
well or cattodic
protcclioo rrc[.
Phemeut of permlt on Job
dte.
Standerds lor tte constucfon,
d.stuctioo, lnecrEvatfuu or
co[vcrdol ol rrt r xdl,
cathodtc protecdon we[ or
geottennel hcat crchetge rell.
Water rrelt stebs.
IMeter vdl saultfuation"
fdudoo ol cutamfuedon
Locetion of water wdl
kot ctiotr of cmmudty
systeE
Log of rev Feter wdl
fpiradon ol pennlt for the
constmction, dcstructiou,
iractivetiou or coavcrsion of a
scll
CertiEcetion for bollding
peruit
Standerds for edequrte w8ter.
Baclilov preveufon &vlce
rcqulrorcut for rater wdb
used for egrtcolhnl chcotcd
applicrfons
Pcrolt for ltc ue or
oparrtion d I nc[ es r
dorclic vr0!r oppty.
Applicalion !o Ebdrg r7dls.
Appllcetion io cdsfilg rrdls
locatad h fu -nincorrorqted
rree of lte Corty lyfug Dore
of Elghray 9l end wcst of
Efolwry 2fl).
Generd standards for ttc
qrcretion or use ol a weicr
wdl es a domestic watcr
soPPv.
Monitoring strnded
Tcstrng rcqdrcmcDts.
Duntiotr of pdmit to opcret
re&r rell es ! doo sdc wat€r
$PPly.
IUght of irspocdotr"
Applicetiou for pernit or
ccttifctta
Fees.
fcsrrrnce Of Fr6it
Veriatces.
Susperiot or revocetioa of I
pernit
Ecaring end determination"
App€.b fo B@rd of
Supervbors.
Violatbns
Ilndings of pubtic nuisance.
Spcdel drcum$anccs.
Wels instrlled without pcroit
Poficicr, reguletions and
procedures.
Abedooed rdls.
Scvcrebility.
4.6El{n
4.6E210
4.68.irn
4.ft,,3/0
4.6/,,24/D
4.6Er50
4fi2fi
4.68,270
4.6ErEo
4.6t190
4.6EJX)
45E310
46/,3m
4.6E-rt0
4.5r3t0
4.6E3r0
4.6E 410
4.6E$
Sections:
4.6t.010
4li8.tm
46&(xl0
4.6EJXO
4.68J80
.f,6&060
4.8,970
4.68Jt60
4.68.(DO
4.68.100
4.6&110
4.A.tm
4.6E l3t)
4.6&l4()
4Jt.l50
4.6t.160
4.6.170
4.68.1&)
4.5t.r90
' P.ir EsE:r: Fric co& r.dids tom &qgi a73S 8 .c!d.d
by Oid.. ltm,424 AB,2t18, ZD9, W d,3l}t-
(4.68) I (s& ff-o C@ar 5al)
4.6t-360
4.5t-yr0
4.6t3E0
4.6E390
4.68,{m
4.58.0f0 IrteDL
It is tbc purposc of 6is cbaptcr to provi& fo tbc
corrstnrtio, c@rrcrsio, inactivatioo, q dcsmrctio
of watcr wells, geotbermal bcat exchaoge well+ od
cathodic prctcctio wells so th.t the gouDdwat€r of
this Comty shall Eot be pollued or contaminatcd
and that g.etcr oboincd Aoo srrch wclls shall be
ad€quae ad $dtablc fa tbc prrpose fa which uscd
and will ac!:opardize ttc bpel6" safety or welhre
of thc peqle of ttis C.ormty. (Ord. 4Ul, 0fB0Ol)
4.6&U0 lhfinitions
The following &fmitims goveru the cmstructio
of this chaptec
(a) "Abendocd well" nnars atry of 6e folloq,-
ing:
(l) A water sup,p$ well which has not been us€d
fr a period of m calcndar year aad has not be€n
permitred as ao inactive wcll by the e-ornty Health
Officcr.
(2) A nmitcing 6 cmtaoinatio exrraction
well which has not been uscd fo a pcriod of thee
calcn&r years aod has not bc.n permittcd as aa
inactive well by the Comty llealth Officcr.
(3) A wdl which is in such a sanc of disrrepair
thzt it cannot be Dade operatimal fc is intended
purpoge.
(4) A tqst hole or oqlctay bcing 24 bours
aftcr constnrtio ard t*ting woft has been eom-
placd.
(5) A cuhodic p(otcctio well thar is oo loger
fiDcti@al f6 its ciginal purpoce
G) 'eghmA well" c'stockwelf neansatry
well used solcly to srryply warer fc irdgatim or
dher agdcuthral pupoaes.
(c) 'Cathodic protcctim well" mpans any well
designed c used to pmtect pipelines, cnks, cables,
power liocs aod other facilities Aom concim.
(d) 'Corroty Heahh Offcef ncans the Eavir@-
menAl lieafth Dfuecrc of San Ivtarco Comty c an
auttaizcd rcpesentarive. The Couty Ilcalh O,tr-
ccr q his c bcr designee chall have tbe authaity
and rcsposibility for tbe euforcement of this chap
1.r.
(e) 'Domcstic watcr srrpplf nEarls a system
cmsisting of a well, stcage aak(s), rcscrvoirs,
integrat€d piping a otbcr rclatcd appurtenaoces uscd
fa th purpces of&livering potablc wat ( iotcded
for human cmr4io- Except as ohcrwbc provit-
ed by this chaprcr, this tcrm shell inchde any watcr
we[, agdcultrrral wetl, industial well c dher t]"e
of well which is used to provide potable warcr fa
hunaa consrytio.
(f; "Dwelling unif mcaas a room q suitc of two
@) c more rooms, which are dcsigned fa, intendcd
fc, oarc occupiedby m firily doing ie cooking
tb€rcin aod having oly onc kircheo.
G) T,>plratfi,, wcll" mcaas I t€st p1odrcti@
well installcd fc tbc pupce of assassing well
water quantity aod qB.lity.
(b) 'Inaaivc q,€ll" Eeaos I well rhrt has bcen
pr0perly secue4 Fdect€d and mainained in an
inactive coditio in accordarce wi6 srate require-
Een.s, f6 a pedod Eot to exce€d five yeas.
(D rceo6ermal hcat cxcbange well" rcans any
artificial excavatio by any mcthod fr tbe purpce
of using tte bcar cxcboge c4acity of tb carth fc
teeting md/c cooling dd in which tbe aobietrt
gIoud teryecature is 86 &grees Fahrenteit c less
and which uscs a cloeed toq fluid systcm ro Fr-
vent thc dischaBe 6 cscape of its fluid into tb
surrorrding aquifers c Ccologc fonatios. Geo
th€rod heat excbaoge wells are ako known as
gund sorce hcat pury wells. Such wells q
bqeholes are oc inteaded to ptroduce wat€|r or
stotutl
@ alorcsidcntial waier use" mns a poble
warer supply urtich serves tte Erblic b a cm-
cial setting that is not subject to surfacc watcr c6-
t.rninrti@-
(k)'Observatim aod mitring well" mos
any atifcial excavati@ @ any netbod fr rhe
pwpose of ohaining vadosc zoc, or
otber subonface &ra, inchding grolrndwatcr levcls
g@dwarcc quality, ad xril vapc quality. Mmi-
tcing ualls shall cmfam with aplicaHe Califcraia
Deparment of Waer Rcsouces, U.S. Euvircn@Ml
hotectim Ag€osy, Stalc Dep{bcnt of Toxic Suts
stance C@trol, or tbe Rcgimal Warer Quatiry Ce-
/
(S.o M&o Ce.a, J{f)@.4\2
4.68.010
r tol Board standads and gdf,ctncs f6 tbc consauc-
tio of mmitming wells.
@ Tersm" rcans any individuat, organizatioo,
partn€rship, busincss, asrociatio, cqprati@ fi
govcrnmtal agemy.
(m) ?oble wated' mcans water thrt corrylics
with sundsds for transicnt nffcmEtmity watcr
systcEs In,rslunt to the Califania Safc Drbkiag
Water Act (Cha@ 4, commcociog with scctio
116275 of prt l2).
(n) Tloperty lirc" rrF-n( tbc hgally esablished
line separating ooe piece of p,roperty frm rnoder
c separating a public-right-of-way from pivare
(o) 'SeweC rcans a pipe c{r}.ing wastewarer
ft,om aoy structure or a part of a cmunity o
iudivllud sewerage syst€m.
(p) 'Spnng" rcans a place where gorDdsatar
flows naturally ftom rock or soil mto tbc land sur-
face aod is not subject o surhcc water contasha-
tio"
(q) "Stabilizcd wat€c bvel duing prryingl
rcatrs rhrt levcl of waf in the well which rcmains
cmst nt .fter a period of grying ar thc specificd
rarc il gallos per miufie prcvided tmder s€ctio
4.68- 190 ofthis chaper. Tte rcquted period of tic
for srch purying Day vary ar rhc discretion of ttc
IIeaXh Officer depeoding upo. thc geological fac-
tqs md goudwatcr recharge of thc sita Ttc Eini-
mum tcst period ftr iodividual docstic wells shll
bc fon hous after ttc waer hvel is stabilizcd.
(r) T/cll" or 'water well" rnrrs ey aflifcid
excavatim by any nahod fc tb purpocc of ex-
tacting water froq o injccting *"t€r into, thc
udergumd.Ihis &6Ditim $atl inchde agkuftur-
al wells and moitoring aod obsenratim well* This
defiaitho shell not inchde: (l) oil aod gas wel\ c
gpotheflrat wells constnred Frr$taot to state law
cxccpt tbse wells converted to use as water wclls;
or (2) wells used fc the prapocc of (A) Dewataing
cxcavatims duing construaio; a @) sAbilizing
hillsidcs c embonhts (Ord" Oa1 0l/3001)
.|"6EIBO Gcnerd stendards
No perso ch^ll costucq rcconstnrt rcpair,
4.68.020
destoy, inactivat , conwrg qperat c usc a watcr
wett, gcothcrmal bcat cxchaoge m cathodic protcc-
tim well exccpt as Eovidcd by this chaptcr. (N-
,l0Zl,0Mn0l)
4.6&040 Wcltdrilter.
Aly cmstnrtio" rccmsE rtim, r€pair, destrrrc-
ticn c conversim of a warer well, geotherral heat
cxchaagc c cathodic pruectim well shall be undcr-
takeo by a well&iller wb pcscsses a C-57 Watcr
Wcll Cmtractods Liccnse rs provfrted by $arc
licessing law. (OlrL 4OA, Ul3{JnD
4.6&050 Midgrdon of dsfirrtance et well
tdte.
(a) Any distubance at a well sitc for the purpos-
cs of cosmcrtio, rccosmrctio, repair, destructio
or coversio of a water wcll, geotbermal hr ex-
cbange a cathodic prorecrio well shall be lisit€d
16 ftg rninimrrrrr 1s6s11j of disOrbance necessary to
gain access to &ill 6e well md sball be in coryli-
aoce with aoy otber pcrtin€at laws c regulacioos,
inchding hn not linited to gr.ding pemit r€quile-
Ee[ts, coesal developEcnt rcgulatios, aod rcad-
way mroaclmcnt permits Drilling fluids ard otbcr
&illing oatcrials plodrcd c uscd in c@rcctim
with well constnrtion, destuction, or conversio
shall aot be albwd to discharge qto s into
stcatsr wat€6 ays, seositive habitaB, q stotflt
&ains. Drilling fluids di.cha'gcd @to an rdjacent
prqerty rcquira ric rriuen pernission of tte prq
cfty owrcr. Drilliag fluirls shall be prqerty man-
aged and dispoecd of in accordance with appticable
local, rcgioual, and staa requiremeots. IJpon com-
plaio of the consmraio, desuction or cmversiou
of tbe well, tbc sile <h'!t be restaed as near as
possiblc to is fiiginal codition, anO appopriarc
erosim cmtrol reasurps shdl be irylemcntcd Sia
restc:atico is tbc respmsfuility of the property oum-
€r ard mlst bc irylemcnted within 60 days of the
corylaio of thc well ad not mqe tu. a yes
from the dafe of tbc perEit issuaoce. In the cvent a
watet well shoqfd, at tbe xtyr of drilling, prcve to
havc a indeqrratc water sr4,ply c quality for its
intended use, n sball be cloeed in accordancc with
(4.68) 3 (Se lr&o C.roa, 541)
4.68.050
rquilt@nts of tbc eamty Healrh Officcr rod thc
sitc shell bc retuned as rcrr as possiblc to i6 qigi-
oal coditim. In the eveot a watet well is tcstcd fc
c.fiificatio fa a building peroit, rny saler geD€r-
atcd by prying &Eing th tcst shall be disburscd
c dispoeed of iD e rninr€r which will not causc
excessive erosim.
(b) IB additioNt to thc rcquirwns of subs€clim
(a) of this scc'tio, thc wcll sita iachding aoy cxcr-
vatims aod drainagc pits" sh.[ at thc tirc of &ill-
ing be secured 6 mrinrdned in srach a rnlrlncr as
lo prevcat injury a dr'n ge to pers(xls d aninals.
(c) Wdls costnrtcd during a period where win-
tcrizatim EqrrfuemeEts are in effcct, betwe€D OctG
b€( 15 ad Aprit 15, shrll comply witt Coutrty
grading and stormwatfr pollmi@ prcventio mea-
5utq9.
(d) Mrd pis sball nor be hstaltred b tbc rtip
zonc of any rra (ord ,(}23, 0ur00l)
4.6EJ50 Statc rcguletior.
Nothing containcd il this ch4ter shall be dcemed
to rclcase atry p€rs6 from cqliaoce vith ttc
provisims of srate la% inchdiug but oor linit€d to
atry r€poiling requircmurs m&r tbe Califqnia
\lraler Code (O!il .l@3, 0ll,O0l)
4litfil0 Fees.
Permit fecs shall gg cbarBed ffi each p€rnit to
cov€r thc co6t of inspccti@ aod enfacemt prrsu-
ast to this chrpt€r, in an amormr to be sa by resolc
tioo of ttc Boqd of Srryerviscs (d" aOAg,
0mryo1)
4i8.080 Permit lor the @nstruction,
dcsfodon, inacdvrdon, repair
or conversion of a water ve0r
geotheroal hcat exchalge vell or
celtodic protecdon wdl
No persm shrll dig, bq€, d€€p€4 tcperfcatc,
excavalq c6stmcl, rcc@struci, inactivate, coove(t'
dcsEoy 6 rqair aoy watcr {rcII. gcottcrml hcat
exchange well c carhodic p,rotcction well" s,ithout
frst havhg applied for and ot*aind a permit fr
such rtivity Arom thc Coulty llealth Officcr pursu-
aat to tbc provisios of this cbatr€r. A pcrlrit grant-
ed pursuant to this cb4ter is valid mly fc tte pro-
poaed activity listcd m the pcrmit ap,plication and
solcly for th sitc specifed 6erein" A pernit gret-
ed pursuant to this scctio does not authorizc tte
usc tr operatio of the well as a wdcr srryply in-
tcoded fc humo cosrrytim as p,mvidcd by scc-
tions 4.68.180 tkough 4.68.280 of this ctaprer.
(Ord" tl@3,0lBOOl)
4.6EIr!r0 Ptaccoent of pcrmtt on job dte.
A pcrmit issncd pusuaat to this chapcr shall be
kcpr available for at tbe well site during
thc course of ard until coryletim of thc costnrc-
tion, rccmsarrtion, Epair, destnrd@, inactivatim
c cmveisim of the well, and until tb site bas been
rcstor€d as per sectio 4.68,050 of this chapter.
(fr.4023,orEo(}l)
46.100 Stendards for lte corctrucdor,
destrucdon, hectivetion or
convendon d water vcll,
cattodic protection wdl or
geottcrnal h.at cl.hrngc rell
All walcr wells, georh€r@l heat exchangc wells,
aod cathodic prctectim wclls Sall be cmscuctc4
rcconsructe4 rceoirc4 &suoyeq inaaivated or
covertcd in accordare with ttc smdards set by
this chapter and by sate laq including th6c r€gula-
tios aod stan&rds issucd by 6e Califcrda Dcpdt-
mcot of Warcr Rcsouces" (fu- 4@, OllIrcl)
46&110 Weter well debs.
All waer wells sbalt bc provided with a warcr-
tight rcinfcced cocrete slab of a minimrrm &iq[-
ocss of (O six incbes which sball cxtend hsizmtal-
ly at least two (2) feer frm tb well casing in all
dftectioDs- Thc concrere slab shdl be adequarcly
slqcd to drain watcr a*ay from the well casing.
The top srrfacc of tte slab at its orn€r edge sba[ be
at least four (4) inches above the $Eorndiog
grumd level. Notwitbhaing tbe provisios of
seaion 4.6E.320 (*Vdances"), lhc County Hslth
Officer may autbdizc alt€rlative specifications for
such cocretc slab c allow an altcmative rrp-ts of
(Sa Ll&o C@y J{l)(4.68) 4
{
I
prot€ctiDt tbc well wh€rc hc frds thrr such dtcrna-
tivc spccificatios or EDans providc pruectio o
thc well equivaleot to that provided under tte rc-
quiemots of this sectio. (O!d" 4@3, 0m00l)
4&1fr Wrier rdl senitizatlon
Alt watcr wcls sh"ll be llrovidd with a pipe r
ahcr effecrive mns of direcdy introdrrcing chlo
rine c othcr disinfectiog agcots into the well (Or&
.r{zt,0lB0ol)
46&130 Erclusion of contamiutiou.
AII watcr wells shall be dcsigned and c@stnrc-ted
to cxckde cdt einati@ as follors
(a) All sanitizatim gipcs fc an above surface
pury dirhargc sha[ extctrd to height equel to the
prry @sal that is at le€st eigh inchcs above tte
finishcd grada Tte prpe shdl be kept sealed by a
tkeadcd c equivalcntly secure cap.
O) All sanitizatio pipcs fa a subsurface prry
discharge iasullatio shal be kePt scaled by a
threaded or equivalently sccur crp.
(c) All air rclicf veots sh-tl tcrminate dowuward
and be sqccocd and Fotected agaiDst the possibility
of cotaniaating naterial atcring thc vcot
(O All cotry pipcs iato gravel packcd sectios of
a wcll shall be dgirU cappd. (Od" 4023,Off,O0f)
45&140 Location of vetcr well
In ord€r io Fdect tbe wat€( sorrce aod puHic
hc.It aod srfcty, all watcr c/ells sha[ be sct back
tom pocsibte sourccs of pollutio ud cotamiaa-
tio. Thc amormt of th saback shrll de?ead rtl,oo
th gcolory, rcil diticas ard tqography of tbe
well sitc. Bccause of tbc oany variables iavolvcd
in thc &tcrminatio of tbe safe hcizontal distance
of a wcll fiom potcdial sources of cotaminatio
and poll*ion, ao @e set of distances will be ade-
quat aDd rcasoable fq all coditims. Io areas
wherc adverse coditios cxist, the disances listcd
will bc inseascd. Covcrscly, wts" cAecidty
favaablc c@diti@s exist c wbcre spocial cas
of protcctio, padcuLrly in coastnrction of the
well" arc providcd, Iesscr distances oay be acce6-
able if approved by fu County Hcafth Officer c his
4.68.110
designee, Tb minimrrm sctbacts, Esucd haizoo-
ulty from the we& sh'll bc:
Frrm aoother well
&om any septic te"t
From a septic nk lcachfield
from a seepage pit
fhm a sewer linc q lareral
&rm a propcrty line (scwcrcd
arca)
km a popctty line (usevrercd
aea)
fton ao crtedq call of a build-
iry'sfodatim
Rrm a bomdry line of any
eascrtrllt dedicaEd to a rr-
scrrred fa sanit{y s€w€rs d
wastc,waler facilities as shown
m a map approvcd by a sai-
tary districr ad placed on file
by that districr with tbe County
Eavirmreatal l+alth Divisio.
(Od.4@3,01600r)
50 fect
100 fect
lm fect
lfl) fect
50 feet
5 feet
50 feet
5 feet
46&150 hotedion of coumuotty system.
Ia ttc cvent a well is uscd on a pro,perty scrved
by a public watcr systeo, 966 shrll be instrllcd
betweeo the dwelling unit cr stnrnne being serrred
warcr aDd the rct€r box or distsibuti@ systcm a
bacldlow p,reveotio &visc apgoved jointly by tbe
C€mty lleslth Otrcer d ttc Wacr Srryaimemdcot
of tbe Public Warcr Systcm- (Ord. ,1t}23, 0lROOl)
46&160 Log of ncw waier well
Aay persm o wbm the Co@ty Ilealth Officer
has issrcd a permit so coostnrct, rEpair, rccomErrct,
inactivarc, cmvcfi or degof, a q/'6ll shrll, within
siry (60) days of tbc corylaio of rhe drilling,
diggipgs, bcring o excavating arltorized by srb
pemit, fimish fre Coraty llealth Offica with a log
of srrch well Thc log shall inclu&, bfi is Eot linit-
cd o, infcrmatim @ thc tlrye of casing, thc number
ad locatio of tb perforarioos thsrein, tbe d@ of
the well aud soil types e.ncormtered dudng dri[ing
of the well, as well as aoy other dara rcquested by
(4.68) 5 (Sa r,r& Cdr r{l)
I
50 feet
i
I
I
i
4.68.160
tltc Comty Ilealth Officcr. Any pcrsm who has
qrlier submiued a log fc the wcll to tbc State of
Califoaia may sarisfy this provision by submissio
of tht samc log to the Comty Hedth Officcr. (ffi.
4g23,O,/finD
4.&flO Epiratiou of pcnrlt for fh
coosrrocdoD, dcsEucdoq
inectivatiou or conversion of e
wdl.
A pa'mit issued pnrsuat to scctirm 4.68.080 for
thc cmsmaio, EcmstructioD, iuacrivatio, de-
stnrcti@ c cmversio of a watcr well cahodic
well c geotheroal heat excbange well
sball cxpire and bccore aull aod void if the wort
aurbuized has nc been coryleted within onc catcn-
dar year following tbe issuaoce of the perniL IJi,o
expiratio of such permit, uo finrher wort may bc
doe in connectio with the custnrctio, reco-
smaioo, rcpair, dcstnrctio, inactivation c cover-
sim of a well uahss aDd until a rcw peroit f6 tbat
purpce is securcd in accordaoce with tbe provisioas
of &is chapter. (Ord 4el 0mff)l)
4.6&180 Ccrtification for bdldiog permit
Upon the coqletion of tbe constuctio or cm-
vesim of a well in coryliaoce with thc provisions
of this ch4ter, the Crrmty IIcsIth Of6cer sh-[,
upo rcquest, cqtify tbe well as a domtic watsr
sup,ply fc oc to forn dwelling units or fc in&rstri-
aI q co"r-p'cial use fa tbc purpoce of ohaining
a building pcrmit to coostsuct a o€*, smmne q for
the cnlargeEDt of an existing strEturE if the well
If,.ovides a warcr srypty that is porable, ad€quatc
ad &liwcd uoder a rninimrrn pnessure of twcnty
(2O) ponods per square inch druing periods of maxi-
mum dc'ond- A certificatioo issued pursuant to rhis
scctio shall be valit oly fo the purposcs of oL
trining a buiHing p€f,mit ad is Doa "nd sball not be
decocd a pcrmit to usc fi opcrate a vell as a do-
ocsic wafcr supply as may be rcquired by sectios
4.68.210 tuough 4.68.280. (Otd.4@, OlIleOr)
4J&l!D0 Steodards for adcquetc rebr.
Fo tbe purposas of this chryer, '@uate wrtcr,
qla ls:
(e) Fr a vertical wcll scrving a single-fimily
dvclling $Eh tcrm shall roo a well, which pro
dsp6 1 rrrinimrrm of 2 l/2 galhs per Ein6e at a
stabilizcd watE levcl drring prmpiog with at least
l25O galtoos of srragc.
(b) For I vertlxl wcll sert ing a single-hoily
dwelling with thc secmd rmit lcss tbao ?50 sqnalc
feet, $rch trrm shalt can a well which poduces e
minimrrm of 3 gallons per minute et a stabilized
watcr lcvcl drrdog prqing with at leasr l'5O0
gallos of staaga
(c) Fc a vertical well servhg two to four dnell-
ing un;B, such tcrm shall mcan a welt which p.
dlpqs at I minimnm at a stabilized wat€f hvel dur-
ing puaing:
(l) Five gallos per minute with 2J00 eeloos
stmagc fc trro dwclling uria.
(2) 75 galms per minutc with 3,750 galtons
staege fd ttr€e dwelling rmits.
(3) Tcn e![ms pcr minute wirh 5,000 galloas
stfiage fo four dwelling units.
(d) Fc a haizmal well a qring saviag a
singlc-frmily dvclling, srrch tcrm sbalt mean a wellc spring that pro<hrces tr rninirnrm flow of 25
gallos per minute vith tniniml!'r| storage of 1250
gellms affer 3O &ys of obscrvatim a if rtoe in
6e &y perio4 Augua I tkough Novcobcr 30, lj
gallos per ninutc fa a rhirty{ay obscrt ation peri-
od md 4000 gallos of sncaga
(c) Fq nmesidcotial usc$ such tcrm shall rre"
ao enxnmt of watcr &tcrnined by ttc Couty
Ilcafth Officer in accordaucc with fre Uniform
Pluobing Code nd waier $ality sandards issrrd
by thc Califoda Dq{r'n€nt of t&altt Scrvices.
(Ord" .l@3, 0lBOOr)
46E 00 Bee.hv prcvcntion dcvicc
rcquiremcut for wrt€r wdls Escd
for agrtcultunl cicnlcel
applicatioos
Agricufturat well irrigatio systems fuchding
(S- ir-o C@.y J{f )(4.68) 6
(
r ttce used for golf corrses whicb enploy chcmicrl
feedcrs or inlrtioo systens sball be cquippcd with
a baclllow preventioa dcvicc approved by the
Couaty Hcalth Officer. (Ord" .l(23, 0lln0l)
4.6&210 Pcrmtt for the usc or opera$on of
a well as e dodc reter supply.
No perso shall use r operatc a wcll as a dorcs-
tb war€r snpply without applying fc and ohaining
a pemit for srrcb activity A,m 6e County Health
Officcr h accsdancc with the provisios of this
chapt6. (OrA SA,OIR00[)
468.Zm Applicrtton to cf,istilg rctls.
Tbc rcquireurnts of this ch4ter sball be applica-
ble to all new wells uscd c operated as a dmtic
urater supply. The rcquiremeots of this cbaprer sba[
na be applicable to wells exising m Aprd 14
19E7, exccpt as p,rovided by scctio 4.6823O. (Orrll
4023,OtBOnD
468130 AppEcation to cxisting wells
loc.tcd iD tte urincorporrted
area of tte Cmt, t iry mrlt of
Elglwey 9l end west ol ffighwey
28t).
The requfuer,ats ofthis chaptcr shell bc applica-
blc to all rells used o opcratrd as a d@ic watcr
snpply which are cxisting at tbc tirc of thc adoE.
tim of tbc odinance codified in rhis chapter, md
ae lcatcd in the uincqpceled arca of thc Couty
tyiog Ddlh of lighway 92 rod west of lfighway
280. (Ord-,(}},, 01/3001)
4.6824iD Geueral staldards for tte
operrtioo or usc of, e vater rell
as a dmcstic vrter opply.
Any well used o operatd alr a dotrcstic water
sup,ply sball meet all standards ofcoostrucrio rmdcr
scctiq 4.68.1fi) of this chaptcr od shall providc
vaLr th,t is potable, adequare, d delivqed und€r
a consisteot rninirnrrm prressnrc of twaty (20)
porods pcr squarc inch drring pedods of naxioum
dcmand and shall not be opcratcd a uscd in aay
"l2'rrrcr that woul4 in the opinio of tte CouDty
4.68.2N
Ilealth Officer, tkcatco 6 barm 6c public hafth
6 safety. The lcrm 'adcquatc" shatt be &fined in
section 4.68.190 of this chaptcr. (fr- OZ],
0rB0()l)
(6&250 Mmitoringfird.rd.
Any well uscd or operatcd as a domstic warcr
supply shrll havc a metcr installed m thc well to
rccod thc volr'rp of warcr used- A recud of such
wat€r usage stall bc suhited by tbe peroitcc o
the Couty lleahh Offcer aaually rmless oahcrwise
Equc6ficd by rhe C@ty l&alth Officer. (d- 4@3,
0m0ol)
L6/E2e0 Tcsdng rqof,rtmcuts.
Aay well uscd or qeratcd as a domtic water
sr4rPly rh,ll be tes*ed fq water qudity ar th. cx-
pcmsc ofttc pamiree upm tbe rcquest ofthc Colm-
ty Ilaht Otrc.r. R6uhs of rhcse tcsts chr be
govided to the Cormty llealth Officer. (Ord. 4023,
0m0()1)
4.6t,Jn0 Ihratiou of peimlt to opcrrtr
weler well as e domcstic weicr
$pplr.
A p€rEit issued pursuaar o this chaper for the
use c opcretio of a warcr well as a domstic watcr
$rppty sh.lt not erryitr 5d shrtt p6{a valil pro
vided thd tbc qeratioo c psc of tbc well is in
with the staodads uDdcr lhb chapEr
and state law. The permiuec shett, bowever, pay aa
amual fec to thc Cdnty Ilcatth Officcr fc rcim-
hrsercnt of tbe ccts of inspectim aod adminisua-
tion of this chaper. The aomt of this amual fee
shall be set by resolutio of the Board of Supervi-
sms. (Ord.,(23, OL[nOl)
46E E0 Xigtt of irs"Gedon
As a cooditi@ fc thc issuaace of a permit undcr
this cbpter, thc Frmiccc shall allow thc Couoty
Il€allh Officcr a ao arltorized t€preseDtative to
cot€r fre property whcre the well is locate4 rryo
rcasmabb notice to the perEi0ce, prqreny owrer
and/or occupant, betwecn the hons of E a-m- and 6
p.m-, uless o6€rryise ageed by the parties, to
(4.68) 7 (5.6 M5 C.dy J{r)
4.68.280
investigata cxamine and tcs thc well ad well sita
(Ord" 4e3, OlR0Ol)
46E 90 Applto:elion for perolt or
c.rtlEc.la
Aay pcrso applying fa a wcll pcrmit or certifi-
catc pursua to tbc provisims of this cnapter shall
cqlea an rylicatio fan prwilod by the C.oua-
ty ltreafth Officcr rnd firoish whatcvcr infqmation
the Comty Hrrfth Officer <beos occc*say rcgad-
ing the propoecd c@stnrcti@, rccoltrrEtiorr' ryair,
dcstructio, inectivation, ccrtiication or qlcratio
of that well. (Ord- 403,olROOl)
4.5E3X) Fccs
Each applicaticn fc a pcrmit or certiftate pro'
vidcd udcr this chapter shall be accoryanied by a
nmrefimdablc cling fea The amouot of such fee
rhell bc sa by rtsolutiou of tbe Bmrd of Supcrvi-
sors. (Od,l(}23,0l4XY0l)
4.68320 Vernmces.
A variance tom tbc specific teros of 6is chaptcr
Eay be grantcd by tbe Coulrty Ileafth O6c€r wha,
dw o special coditios a exceptioal circunsunc-
es of thc property, its locatio c surormdings, a
literal cnfqccmcnt of this cbapter would result in
rmeccssary hadsbips. A variamce camot be ap
p,roved if it wo d be cotrary to tb intcot of this
chapter c hrm public hedth, safety a welfrrE
Applicaios for a vdace shall be made in writitrg
od flcd lvith the Co@ty Health Officer with fu
r€quest for a penDit I certificate provided by this
chapter. The Coutrty llcakh Officer shall rnekc I
dctcrminati@ o the rcqrcst fq variance within
thirty (30) days of rccciving thc cmpleted applica-
tim. (onl,toz,, 0ul00r)
4J83:n Sospdn or rcvocatiou of a
Pernit
In the eveot any perso holding a permit fc rhc
cms&rtio, tEc@iinrcti@, repair, destn,ctiq inac-
tivatioo, coversion fi operatioo of a well pursuant
o this ch4tcr violates the tcrms of the permit, this
cbaptcr o strtc la% a conducts or carrics m any
usc under that pcrmit thar h matcrially detrirmtal
to the public bcalth. safety or welfare, tbc Couaty
Health Officer shell revokc o suspeod such permit
in accordarc with tte procefircs set fdrh below:
(a) Excqt as povided in subsectio (b) of this
section, uo pcrmit issued lEd€r tbe prcvisioEs of
this chapct shall bc revo&cd o suspended rmtil a
hearing fu hcH by tbe C@ty Health Officc(.
Wrifen notice of tbc bcariag ad inteEt to revokc
c sspend tho p€mit shall be served upon the
pe{miEee as p,mvided ia subsectim (c) of this sec-
tio.
O) The Coffiy tlcal0 Offic€r may rcvokc c
suspend a peemit issued und€t' rhis cbapter befce a
hearing is hcld o the matter f, in thc qinion of
thc Cqmty lle.lth Officer, tbe conthued rtivity a
ssc udcr the permit cmstiales an im'n dirtc md
substantial threat o public health" safay m welfarc.
(c) Wrirea notice undcr this section shall s616
the grouds fa ttc rcvocario or suspensio in clear
and cocise LDguage, atrd the dafe, tioe and place
fc thc hearing. Snch ncice sball be scncd by
rcgistered r-il a personal service m thc perriaee
at lerst teE (fO) days prir to tbc date set fq the
headng. (Ord",le!, fBOOI)
(Sr fr{.o Cea, 5{l)(4.68) 8
i
,l
I
I
I
;
I
I
I
4.68310 Isoance of Froit
A pcrmit 6 certificate providd undcr this chap
ter sball be isred by tbc Cornty lleal6 Officer
within fifte€o (15) working &ys aficr receipt of m
apprcpdafic and coqlcte applicario aod payocnt
of the rcquired filt'g fee if, in fu qinnn of thc
Corruty Heal6 Officer, tbe prceosd costructioo,
recostnrction, re.pair, destuctio, cuversion, usc,
iaactivatio, operation 6 certificatio of tbe well
corylies with tbc rcquino€ots of this chatrer and
such actio will Dot causc pollrtio (r cqltami&ts
tio of watcr resorccs a in any othcr mmner jexry>
aldize thc prblic hcahh, safety a wetfce. (Ord-
,l@3,0lROOl)
4.6834{l Earing rd determinetion
At the beariDg provided rmder section 4.68.330,
tbc pemioee 6 e authorized qre,seotative shatl
be given sn oppofturity to be heard aEd prcseDt
(
(
(
r cvidence. Upm cmclusim of such hearing, tbc
CoEty Hcdrh Offcer shall de&rminc wbcthcr c
not the perBit sball be suspeodcd or revoked c, in
the cveot there is ao suspensim or revocatioo,
whethcr additimal conditios necassary to grvent
ary prescnt 6 firture thresr to thc public health a
safety sbould be impoccd. Tbe decision ofthc Corm-
ty lle.lth Officer shall be na& in wdring within
thirty (3O) <hys aflcr tbe bearing aod shel providc
thc reasms for the decisim. The wriuen &clarati@
shall be scrved by registered m^it 6 persooal ser-
vice upon the permioec. (Oid. ,l(Zt, ofBool)
4.6t350 Appeats !o Boo.d of Supervisors
Any aggrieved party nay appeal the decisio of
the Couty lleat6 OfEcerrsulting Aoto the hearing
povided in sectio 4.6E.330 !o the Board of Sqcr-
vis@s by filing a notice of ap,peal with tbe Couoty
Il€alth Officcr on a fcrm provided by that office.
Tbc notice of appeal Eust be filed within tco (lO)
woking days Aom tb ,l^re 6f ths issrance of rhe
CouDty tledth O6c€r's decision. Within thnry (30)
days of a timely filing of r notice of appeal, tbe
Comty llealdr Officer shall uansmit the naice
togeth€r with iB miilres ad all other records in the
mrtt"r to the Boa(d of Srryervisrs. Upoa receiviag
a uotice ofappeal, rccord and suppotting documeas
ftm tb Colrnty tledh Otrc€r, the Boord of Sw
pcrviscs shall s* thc mtter fa public hearing. At
such baring, tbe Boad of Sqperviscs chett have
all tbe powers of the Comty Heafth Officcr undcr
the provisios of this cbager. In deciding an ryeal"
thc Bood of Supervisqs shall not hcar or cmsider
aay evidence of any kind 66fo1' thm the evidce
cotained in tbe rccqd received from 6e County
Itrealth Officer, nd aoy argrent o rhc mits of
tbc casc other tbm that coaired in tbc notice of
appcal, uless it s€rs the mattcr f6 a baring de
novo befqe itsclf asd gives tbc sam ucir:c of
hearing tbat is requircd fc hearings befqe the
Co@ty Health Officer rmder section 4.68.330. Ile
dccisio of tbe Board of Supervisos upo an ap,peal
is filal and conclusive iu tbe oater. (O!d" 40U1,
Ol/30,0l)
4.68.340
4.6E360 Vtolrtlore.
Any violarim of this chapcr sh'll be a Eisdc-
mea"q and shalt be punishable as provided by the
Sao IUaco Cormty Ordinace Code. (Ord. {83,
0Lrmol)
.L6t370 fhdings ol public nuiserca
Not*itbstanding any otbcr actio o pcnatty pru.
vided by lau any violation of this cbaptcr sha[ be
dcemed a public uuismcg ald the Cormry Health
Officer my coumce actio c p,roceedings fo the
,ba@t, remoyal ard/tr €njoiDE [t tbercof in ay
namcr provided by fau,. (fu- 4OB, 0f/3OOl)
4.683$ Spcdaldrtnmsences
Bcfac issuing any pccmit urder section 4.6E.0g0
fo constructio of a water well fi gpothanal hcat
cxcnange weII. the Couaty l{eahh O6cer lDay con-
si&r wt€ther &e greting of ttc permit would result
in special circunstanccs wiich may preseat a theat
of harm o the bealtb safety q welfare of persoas,
wat€ch€ds, aquifcrs c tbe enviromt If the
C@ty HcaIh O6cer derermines rbat special cir-
ciumstarces exist which oay rcsult i! harD to the
bealth, safcty c welfare of persos, watersbeds,
aquifers a the envirmment, the Comty Hcath
Officer may deny such pcmit a grant $rch permit
with coditios d.sigtEd to climinare $rch thrcat
'Spccial circumsuoces," fu the pnrposcs of rtris
sqctioE (h l include but not be liEit€d to
(a) A well pro,posed in an arta rhrr is sutea o
a spocific and localized goudwa&r pmbtcrD;
(b) A well futeoded f6 rmusually high wat€r
usage plttpo,Bes (ag. a well iut€nded to serve a
hel) which presents a pordtial of over&augtt of
an aquifer. (Ord- 4021, 01/3001)
46&300 lVdls irstatled wlttmt permit
IrP@ d€termfuing rhar a well has been installed
withot Se rcqtrired pqmit or permits, the County
Itrealth Offcer oay issue a cease and <bsist order by
6a1dfi6d rrrail, rct m receip rcquestd to tbe owrcr
of the property where the well is locatd rcquiring
the owner to irnrrrdiately cease use of the well od
(4.6E) e (56 ll&o CEry 5{r)
!
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
4.68.390
to obtain srch permits iN are necessary to destroy
the well s legalize its usc. (Ond. 4923, 0lR0,Ol)
4.68.400 Potcies, rcgulafiom and
proccdures
thc Comty Health Officer shall adopt policies,
regulations and procedures cmsistcnt with this chap
t€tr, as approl1niatc, to irylrent the provisios of
this chager. (Ord- 4023,0l.{l0rcl)
4.6&410 Abandoned wcllc
It is mlawfrrl to mainain an abandmed well.
Any person owning prcperty upon which an aban-
doned well is locat€d shall ohain a permit to dc-
stroy tr inactivate tbe well (&d- 4o23,0UlOOf)
4.6IEAA) Scverebility.
If any sectio, subcectio" paragraph, seDtence
clause c Srase of this cbapta is fq rcason held to
be invalftl a rmconsinrtimal by a decisim of a
cort of cqAent jurisdictim, it shrtl rot alfect tbe
remaining potios of &is chapter, inchding any
other section, subeectim, sentcnoe, clause cphase
tbcrein. (Or!d- 4023, 016010l)
i
/
(S.a MGo CaEry 5{t)(4.68) r0
(C\apter 4.72
BACKFLOW PREVENTION
4.72.010
within thc unincorporatcd area of the County of San
Mateo and within thosc additiooal geographic arcas
in which the County Health Offrccr is responsible
by municipal ordinancc incorporating the provisions
hereofand confact for cnforcing statc sta es, order,
quarantines, rulcs or rcgulirtions rclating to baclJlow
prevention. (hior code $ 4751; Ord. 2413,
Ollllll7: Ord. 3497, 06/08/93)
412.010 "Cross-counection" defiucd.
The term 'cross connection" shall have that
meaning defined in Section 7583 (e) of Title 17 of
the California Code of Regulations. To paraphrase
that definition, it is any physical connection or
iuiugernent b€tween wo otherwise separate piping
systenrs, one of which cootains potable water and
the other water unknowrr or questionable safety,
whereby water rnay flow from one system to tlre
other, the direction of flow depending on the prcs-
sure differential between the two systelns. (Prior
code $ 4760; M. Ul3, OlllllT7; M- 3497,
06/08t93)
4.72.W Mahtetratrceofcross-connection
prohibited-
It shall be unlawful for any person to have, kecp,
maintain, install, or allow the existence of a cross-
corurectioo. (Prior code $ 4770; Otd- 2413,
outnT)
4.72.0il Correctionofcross-connections.
Any device installed for the purpose of eliminat-
ing a cross-connection shall conform with State law
and this Ordinance and shall be approved by and
installed under the supervision of the County Health
Officer or the officer's designated appoinr€e-
BacHlow prevention devices installed under permit
from inspected by tlre local building department
shall be deerned to comply with this fuinance.
(Prior code $ 4771 ; ord- Ul3,OllllnT: Ord..3497 ,
06108/93)
Sections:
4.72.O10
4.72.Vn
412.W
4.72.W
4.72.050
4J2.V|O
4:t2.W
4.7L0X)
4.72.t00
4.7LttO
4.7L1:n
4lLtn
Pnrpose snd iuthority.
Scope and epplication
'Crms.cooneclion' d€fi trcd.
Maintenaucc of cro6s-
cotrnoclion prohibitcd.
Correction of cross.
conn€ctioDs.
Watcr supply; sale of devices
or matcrials that may cause
pollutioa
Tcsts of bactf,ow prevention
devices.
Qualified tcsters
D[ty to Eaintai! bacMow
Prevention deYicrs
Local plumbing codes.
Authority to itrsp€.t
Enforcement
Scctiom found invalid.
4.7iL010 Purpose and euthority.
Thc purpose of this chapter is to establish rc-
quircrnents for bacHlow prevention complementary
o ttoce imposed by the Stat€ Departuent of Health
un&r Health and Safety Code Sections 203 aad 208
and embodied in fide l7 of the Califorda Code of
Regulatioos, Scction 7583 et seq. Health and Safety
Code Sections 450 ann 452 and Section 7584 of
fitle 17 of the California Code of Regulations grant
authority to the County to fulfill the purpose of this
chaptcr. (Prior code $ 4750; fr. 2413, AUlfi1:
o[:d. Y97,06/08/93)
4.72.Un &ope and application
Thc baclJlow prevention requirenrots imposed
by sections a.72.MO throug;h 4.72.13O and the fecs
as set fofih in San Mareo County Ordinance Code
section 5.64.Ctl0 shall apply to all businesses, dwell-
ings, activities and piping systems of whatever sort
(4.72) |
I
I
4.72.W
I
4;t2.W
412.W tYater supply; sale of devices or
meterisls th.t mey csusc
pollution.
No person shall advcrtisc locdly by local means,
sell, or offer for use or sale any water-treating
chemical or substancc, watcr-using or waterqerat-
ed equipment, rnechanism or contrivance which roay
cause contamination or pollution of the dornestic
warer supply if not equipped with an approvcd
brcldlow prcvention device, unless such person
sutes in such advertiscrnent or at tirne such sale or
offer that State law and this Ordinance nray require
such device in connection with the use of such
ctremical, substancg equipnrnt, mechanisrn, or
contrivance. (Prior code $ 4772; OId. 2413,
Olllltl7; ord. YEl, 06/08D3)
4J2.Vl0 Tests of backflow prevention
dcvices"
BacHlow prevention devices (double check
valves, rcduced pressure principle devices and prcs-
sure vacuum breakers) which have been installed to
meet the rcquirenrnts of Tide l7 of the California
Code of Regulations and this Ordinance shall be
tested when initially install€d aDd at least once each
calendar year thereafter by a percon authorizrd by
the Comty Hcalth Officer or thc officer's desigoared
appointee. Records of such tests shall be fild with
the Department of Health Services, Division of
Environnrntal Health within thirty (30) days after
such tess, upon forms provided by the Divisioo of
Environrnental Health-
When a baclJlow prcvention device is inspected
and has passcd the testing procedurc, the authorized
tester shall immediately affix an inspection tag to
the device. When a backllow prevention device fails
the testing procedure, the authorized testcr shall
immediately affix a "Failed" tag device. The
'Failed" tag shall remain affued until the device is
repaired or rcplaced, has passed the testing proce-
dure and has been afFued with an inspection tag.
Both tags shall be purchased by the tester ftom the
Department of Health Services, Dvision of Environ-
mental Health at a fee as set forth in San Mateo
County Ordinance Code, section 5.64.070. (Prior
codc $ 4773; Ord. 2413,0lllll77; Ord. 3066,
05/13/86; Otd. Y97. 0608/93)
4.TL.W Qualifiedtesters.
No person shall test and/or make r€ports on
bacldlow prevention devices unless he or she pos-
sess a cunent alhorization isrued by the County
Health Ofricer or the officer's designated appointee
as follows:
(a) The County Health Officcr or the officer's
designarcd appointee shall audprize any applicant
who demoostrates competenc€ to rest and make
reports on bacKlow prevcotion devices in compli-
ance wi6 rhe rcquirerents of Title 17 of tbe Cali-
fornia Code of authorizarion fce as set forth in San
Mateo Comty Ordinance Code section 5.il.V70
Applicants shall dcmonst'ate such comptcnce by:
(l) Pre.sentirg a valid certificarc as a Backflow
Prevention Tester issued by the Ancrican Water
Works Association (AWlVA). Penons who possess
certification/authorization by San Mareo County to
tcst baclflow prevention devices prior to January l,
1993, shall be exempt from this rcqutement.
(2) Undertaking an ral examination administered
by tbc Couty Health Officer or the offrcer's desig-
nated appointee. Any such certilicate holder may be
required o undergo additional training, reexamina-
tion, othcr dcrnonstration of competency or any
combination thereof, as rnay be deeured necessary
by thc County Health Officer or thc officer's desig-
nated agpointce.
(b) A test€r's authorization nray be suspended or
revoked at any tirnc if tlrc County Hcalth Officer or
the officer's designated appointee determines that
the esrcr's actions may constitute a threat to public
health aod mfety. The test€r sh.ll be given notice
of such actioo and shall be given the opportunity of
a hearing in front of the County Health Off,rcer or
the officer's designated appointee. Such hearing may
be reguestei within tea (10) wo*ing days from the
date of notification of the intended suspension or
revocation of the authorization. The Foundation for
Cross Connection Cotrtrol ard Hydraulic Research
shall be infornr;d of all authorization revocations.
(4.72) 2
r The DeparurEot of Health Services, Division of
Eavironrnental Health shall nuintain a cunent list
of narnes and business addrcsscs of aII authorized
tesrers and of all testers whose certifi-
catcJauthorization have becn srspended or rcvoked.
Any tester nuy be required io undergo additional
training, reexamination, olher dernonstration of
competcngr, or any combination thercof, as rnay be
deemed neccssary by thc County Health Officer or
the officer's designated appoint€c-
(c) Authorization may be renewed by payment
of the annual authorization fee on the first month
thet the authorization was originally issued. Proof
of AW\MA recertification shall be submitted to the
Coutrty Health Of6cer or the officer's designated
appointce every three years. (Prior code $ 4774;
N. Ul3, OU|W t Qrd. 2514, 6l?,ol7E; Ord. 3066,
O5173186; Ord. 3497, 060E/93)
4iL@0 Duty to maintatn bacldow
prevention devicrs
It shall be unlawfuI to use any bacKlow prcven-
tion device required by Title 17 of the California
Code of Regulations and this ordinance uoless it is
in good rcpair. Devices which arc defective shall be
repaircd urd tested imrnediately upon fint use. A
rcport thercof shall be filed with the DeparUrrm of
Health serviccs, Division of Eavironrnental Health
within thirty (30) days after such test. (hior co&
$ 4775; Ord. 2413, 0ltlll77 ; &d. y97, 06/08/93)
4.72.100 Local plumbing codes
Nothing in this chapter shall exempt any person
from compliance with applicable requirernents ofthe
local Plumbing Codes. (Prior code $ 4776; Ord.
2413,0u1fi7)
4.72.110 Authority to hspcct
All facilities shall be available for inspection by
the Health OfEcer or the ofEcer's designated ap
pointee to detcrmine if protection of the public
water supply is required. The frequency of inspec-
tion shall be determined by the degree of bazard. A
fee for tlrese inspections shall be charged as set
4.72.@0
foth in San Mateo County Ordinance Codc, section
5.&.W0- (Prior code I 4777 t N. 3497, 06108/93)
4.72In Enforcement
The Health Offrcer or the officer's designarcd ap
poinrce shall have the authority to enforcc this ordi-
nanc€.
(l) The Health OfEcer or the officer's designated
appointee may require a water purveyor to discon-
tinue water service to any premises wherein viola-
tions of this ordinance exist.
(2) Any person who violates any of the provi-
sions of this ordinance, or later bypasses or rcrders
inoperative any backflow prevention device installed
under the provisions of this ordinance may, in addi
tion ro other penalties prescribed, be subject to
discontinuance of water service. Water service shall
not again be rcinstated until such violations have
been corrccted as ascertained by the County Health
OfEccr or the of,ficer's designated appornter.
(3) Any person who violates any provisions of
this Ordinance shall be guilty of an infraction, pun-
ishable by:
(a) A fine not exceeding frfty ($50) dollars for
a first violation.
(b) A fine not exceeding one hundred ($100)
dollars for a second violation.
(c) A fine not exceeding two hundred frfty dol-
lars ($250) for each additional violation withio one
(l) year.
Each day that a violation exists shall constitute
a separate and disthct offense-
(4) The County Health OfFrcer or rhe officer's
designee is hercby authorized to institute and pur-
sue, in the name of the County, pursuant to the
provisions of section 25132 of the Government
Code enforcernent of the infractions before Court-
(Prior code $ 4778; Ord. 3497,C6108193)
4.72.130 Sections found invalid.
If any provision, clause, scction, sentence or para-
graph of this ordinance or the application thereof to
any pcrson or circumstances shall be held invalid,
zuch validity shall not affect the other provisions of
this ordinance which can be given effect without the
(4.72) 3
I
4.72.130
invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions ofthis scction are declared to be sever-
able- (Prior code $ 4779; Ord.1497,05rcA93)
(
I
i
(
(4.72'.) 4
l
I
I
!
!
I
Chapter 4.76
CIIEIVtrCAL TOILETS
Conformity witt standards
Location
Identification
Slze.
Privecy and prot cdoo from
the elcmcnts.
Walls and ceilings
Illumination
Yentilation
Storage teDks.
Toilct seats.
Drop tub€s.
Distauce hom edge.
Urirsls.
Toilet paper.
Maintenauc'e.
Tsnk chcmicals.
Sewage dlspoeal.
Yariation from slandards.
4.76.010
4i6.W Si?r.
Every structurc housing a chemicd toilet shall be
sufficiendy large to ptovide adequate space for
users. The minimum width and depth of such struc-
tures shall bc 3 fcet 6 inches. (Prior code $ tBl2;
Ord.2413, OUlfi7)
4.76.050 Privacy and protcction from the
€lcmenls-
Every suucorrc housing a chernical toilet shall
afford privacy to users thereof and protection from
thc elenpnts. It shafl be construcled to exclude
therefrom all rodents, insects, atd vermin of whatev-
er sort. All openings of the structure to the outside
shall be enclosed with nretal mosquito screcning.
The door shall be constsucted as to bc self{losing.
(Prior mde I 4813; Ord. 2413,0U1n7)
4.76.0@ Walls and ceilings.
The walls and ceilings of the structure shall be
reasonably smooth and well painted in a light color
and be capable of withstanding repeated washing
and scnrbbing. (Prior code g aE14; Ord. 2413,
0utrn7)
4.76.UO lllrrmination.
Every structure housing a chemical toilet shall
have a vent or window to provide light during day-
light hours. Every structue intended for use at night
shall have provision for artificial light thercin. (hior
code $ 4815; Ord. 2413, OUIli7)
4.76.0E0 Yeotilatioo.
Every structurc housing a chemical toilet shall be
adequately ventilarcd. Ventilation openings shall
comprise at least four (4) square feet and shall be
screened with lGmesh scrcen or its equivalent.
(Prior code $ a{tl6; Ord. 2413, OUllnT)
4.76.$0 Storage tanl$.
Chemical toilet storage tanks shall be enclosed
within the structure, properly vented, watertight, and
in good repair. (Prior code g 4817; Ord. 2413,
outwT)
4.76.010
4.76.t20
4.76.On
4.76.W)
4.76.05n
4.76.W
4.76.V1O
4-76.080
416W0
4.76.100
4.76.110
4.76.1:m
4.76.t10
4.76.tA)
4.7&130
4.76.1@
416.170
4.76.1E0
4.76.010 Conformitywithstandards.
No chemical toilet or stnrcilr therefor shall be
erecte4 consmrcte4 or maintaincd for use unless it
conforms with the standads F€scribed by this chap
ter. (Prior code $ 480O; M. 2413, 0llllnT)
4.76.tm Location.
A chemical toilet shall be located at least four (4)
feet ftom a property line, at least twenty (2O) fe€t
from the nearest occupied residence, and at least ten
(10) feet from a street or public sidewalk. (Prior
code $ 4810; Ord.Ull,Olllln7)
4.76.030 ldentification.
Every structure housing a chemical toilet shall
have painrcd thercon in clearly legible letters at leasr
three (3) inches in height the name of the owner and
the number of the unir. (Prior code g 4811; Ord.
24t3,O!1fi7)
(4.76) |
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
Sec'tions:
I
I
I
I
i
4.76.1m
4.76.100 Toilet seats
Thc toilcr scar shdl bc a commercial, split-ftont
type, oval io shapc wift a smooth, irycwiots sur-
facc, and insullcd as to be easily cleaed. Thc seat
shall bc cemered ovcr the hole o prevcnt thc dcpo-
sition of fecd rDatcr on si&s of the drop obe.
(Prior co& 0 a8l8; Ord" 2413,0llll/iT)
476U0 lhop tub€s
Evcry &op tube shall havc sidcs installed verti-
cally u flaed out at the cooncctioo to the sttrage
tank Every drop nlbc shall follow 0rc shapc of the
toild scat od fit smoothly ioto tte top of th€ ta*
enclowe. It shall have t noncofiosive grrfacc-
Thcrc shall bc ao crac*s or mugh edgcs arurnd lhis
opcning r in thc entire bench. Circuhr opcniogs
shall be pennitted only if their diameter is at least
equal to tlE largest dirmsioo of 6c toibt sea
opening. (Ptior codc ! ,t819; Otd. Ul3, OUIW)
4.7&tm Dktance from cdge.
No chemicd toila opening atr 11 6s mqre rrun
two (2') inches from the ftotrt wall of the tank
enclosre. (Prior codc 5 a820; Ord. Zl3,0Ullm)
416.1fi UriDals.
Errcry stnrcnre holsing a chcmical toibt inrcnded
for male usc shall also conain a urinal locatcd at
least twenty (2Of inches from thc toilet seat opetr-
ing. The urinat shalt be made from durable, noooq-
rosivc, inrycrviors material finishcd with srnooth
surfaces and proFr slopes so rh.t it is easily
cleaned and rcadily drains. A splash boad of similar
rnarcrial at leas cight inches (&') higher thaD 6€
overflow rim shall bc provided. Hoscs or pipcs used
to drain urinals shall be a minimum of one irch (11
inside diamacr, shall be securely atrhed, and shall
be constnrcled of a aoncornosive, waertight, easily
cleanable Daterid. The urinal sh.ll be desigr€d to
minimize splashing. (Prior codc ! 421: d.2413,
outtm)
4.J6^,14/D Toilet paper.
Every stuctrrc housing a chemical toilet sball
have a toilct pper dispenscr which must at all tirrcs
bc srpplicd with toilet paper in a quantity srfficicnt
for the norroal use of the toila. (Prior codc 0 4E22;
Ord.2413, OUllnT)
4.16150 Maintenance-
A chemical toilet shall be kcpt clean aod in good
rcpair at dl tirB. The intcdor of the sEuctrItc and
tanks shall be cleancd upm installation, ar least
oncc a wcck while thc units arrc in usc, morc ftre-
quently when recessry to minAin them in a clean
and odor-free condition. The unirs shall be rcpainted
wten necessary. (Prior code I aA8; Ord" 2a13,
outrr,7)
416-1fi Tenk clemicgls-
After each cleaning, therc shall be placed in the
trnk a solutioo of a type which cffectively corrols
odors. r hen inidelly filled.nd at all times when
in use, the tank shall co,nain srfficient solutio to
cover all solids rccumularcd and o prevent fly
heeding. (Prior code $ 4824; Ond. ,413, OUllnT)
4.7Gt10 SewagedispocsL
Sewagc ftorn chemicd toilets shall be disposed
of only in a saniury sewer system approved by the
County Heafth Otrrcer and the legal entity rcsponsi
ble for thc sanitary scvers. (Prior code $ 4E5; Ord.
ut3,oultm)
436.1U Variation from stedards.
The County Health Offrcer oay authorize vria-
tions from the standards prcscribed by this chapter
wherc he finds a proposcd variation to provi&
saniury gotection equivalent to that required by
such staDdards. (Prior code $ .lE3q Ord. Zl3,
ovttm)
(4.76) 2
(
Scctions:
Chapter 4.tll
RODENT AND INSECT CONTROL
4.EO.010
oftcn as is trcccssary to tf,Evcnt rhc brceding or
habitation of flics and sball be disposed of in a
manncr satisfactory to 6e Health officcr. Every
building, lor, prGmises, vehicb, or othcr placc shall
be cleaned and insecticides sprayed thcrein in a
manner and with a ftequcocy satisfactryy to thc
Ilcalth Officcr. (Prior co& g 4852; Ord. 2413,
outlm)
4-&l,lXO Addittonal prohibition
DGq[itoca
No person shall permit thc accumularim in or
under any building, lot, prcmises, vehicle o othr
plre ovcr which hc has o,ncrship or control of any
stagDrnt pool of watcr r otbcr brecding sources for
rnoequitocs. Such sourccs shall eitlrer be climinared
by draining or filling, o( treared with appropriatc
chcmicals or biological cootol agents in a maturr
and wifi a ftequcocy satidactory to tbe County
Heath Officer. (Pdor co& g 4E53; Ord. 213,
outvm
4J{1.0$ Ilcfinition"
'RodenFprmf" rE os constructed ard rnintaimd
in a manner prcventing tlre cnrance and harboring
of rodents. Arnoog the charactedstics of such con-
struction and maintenaoce are the following:
(a) Open spaccs not wider rhan one-fourth (l/4)
inch around doon and windows o Eevent the pas-
sage of rcdents.
(b) Exterior openings of buildings or smrchtres,
such as louver vents and ventilation systems, cov-
ercd with corrosion rcsistant wirc nresh, tb area of
each opening of which is no more than one-fourth
(l/4) of one (l) square inch. (Prior code g 4860;
Ord.2413, OUfin7)
4.t0.0O Stnrctures cootaining food for
human or anlrnal COrLSumptiOD-
All comrnercial or iadustial btrildings, stsucffes
or portions thercof which are used for the rnanu-
facture, prcparxion, storage, handling, sale or dis-
play of any food or food products for human or
animal consumption shrll be of rodent-prcof con-
strucrion, The county Health ofEcer slralt determine
4.t{1.010
4.W.Om
4t0.030
4-E0.040
480-t150
4.80-r)60
4.80.070
kohibitioo.
Additional lrrohibition
rcgerdiry m.ilents.
Additional prohibition
regrrdiag Oics.
Additional prohibition
rtgudlng noequitoca.
Dc6nitiou.
SEu(tures coffrinirg food for
humen or animal
consrmpdon
Edorcmcnt
(80.010 hohibltion
No pcrson shall rccrryy, rnaiotafur, or allow others
to occlrpy or maintain, any building, loq premises,
vehicb c otter place over which hc has owncrship
or cootrol, itr a conditioo which permiB the brceding
or hatoriag of rcdents, flies, fleas, lice, ruosquitocs,
cockrorhes, ticks, bedbugs, or other vermin. (Prior
code I tt850; N. Ul3, OUnnT)
4&).020 Addition t prohibifion rcgsrdfug
rodcnls.
No perrcn shall permit thc rccumu}uio in any
building, lot, prEmises, vehicle, or other placc over
which he has ownenhip or control of any rmterial
rh.t might scrve to harbor rodents udess such maie-
rial is elevated not less than eighteen inches (18")
above thc floor or ground witi a clear intcrvening
space thereunder. (Prior code 0 4t5l; fu. Zl3,
outtm)
4.80.Ut0 Additionalprohibidonrcgsrding
flies
No perrcn shall permit the accumulation in any
buildilg, loq prcmises, vehiclc, or other place over
which lp has ownership or control of any fly-breed-
ing material. Such rrarcrials shall be removed so
(4.80) I
I
i
I
I
I
I
)
!
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
4.t0.060
if srch rcdent-proofng is adcqualc to Feved rodeat
infesation and if rodent infestation cxists or is likely
to occur. (Prior code 5 {$St; Ord. ?4l3, Ollllll?:'
Ord.3l13, 06ll6lEit)
,f811.(xl0 Enforcemcnt
'Whencvcr tlrc County Heal0 Officcr upon in-.
spection finds a violation of any of tte provisioos
of this chaptcr, he shall notify in writing rhe owner,
his agcog or tte trnang occupant, or possessor of
the bmilding, loq premises, vehicle, c other placc of
the spccifrc conditioas cosiorting srch violation
aDd shalt indicac tbc specific mnues nccessary
to abstc said conditions. (Pric codc !,187Q Otd.
?A13, OlllllTl; c*chline cditorially crtatc4 6,94)
(4.ffi) 2
(
\
Sections:
Cbaptcr 4.t4
INDTVIDUAL SEWAGE DISFOSAL
SYSTEMS
4.84.010
systcms granted an cxcmptioo o the prohibition
cootained in rcsolutioo ?67 of the California Rc-
giooal Water QElity Cooool Boad San Francisco
Bay R.gion, datcd April m, lyl6, which pertains
to the EmcraH La&e Hills area and Oak Kooll Man-
or area of San f/faro Cqlnty. (Prior code $ 4891;
M.n$,r2fZ1EO)
4E4.030 ProhiHtioa-
It shall bc udawfuI for my pcrson, whetbcr as
Fircipal, s€rvet, agcot or enployec, to own or
operate an indivi&tal scwagc disposal system for
which a cu[rnt certifrcale of inspection is not it
effect This prohib,ition <hFll not apply to septic tank
systens Gfcrcd to ia thc last paragmph of scction
.U.VD uotil March I, 1981. (Prior code ! ,1892;
&d.ns,Dnyn)
484.040 RcgoLdoos"
Tbe Hcaht Offccr is ethorized !o ismc regula-
tions p,roviding gufohlines aod criteria to carry drt
the purposcs of fis chapter. Such regulatioos shall
be appnoved by the Board of Supervisors prior to
their effective datc. The Heafth Officer is authorized
to waive any particular rcquirernent impoced by
such r€gulations if he deternines that equivalerce
in performarcc is auaiaed despite non-compliance
f,,ith said Egulations. (Prior code 0 4893; d.
nE,tv23tw)
4.84..W Appeals.
If the progerty owaer of rccord of an individual
sewagr disposd system is dissatisfied with any
action or detennination of the Health Officer pursu-
a !o this cha$er, he shall have the right to appeal
to the County Hearing Officer, in wdting, within ten
days aftcr notificaion of the rtion of the Health
Of6ccr. Upon rcccipt of said appeal, the Couory
4J4-010
4.M.0m
4J4.030
4J4.0{)
4.t4.0t0
4.84.050
48/,.frt0
4-E4.(E0
444090
4.t4100
4J4.ll0
4,4.t20
4J4.130
Pur1loee.
ApplicaHlity.
kohibition
RcguhdoDs.
Enforccmcnt
Appeals
fEealth ofEccr' dcfircd.
'Ildividoal scwrgc dspos.l
sydem'dafincd"
'?crsof d:finen
Certi6cerc of inrycttion
Triennial ircpeclioa and
rcmral.
Ddectivc sysieus.
Revocation of ccrtifcate of
inspe.tion
4t4.010 hrpoec.
The provisioos of this chagtcr are intcndcd to
insre thet the continued disposal of sewage within
a develo@ building sia shall be accomplished in
a safc and sanitary maoner in order to protect th
public health, mfcty and rvelfarc. (hior co& g
A.U.Vil Applicability.
This chapa'is applicable o all individual sewage
dispoaal systcns which are comrnrct€d after th€
effective date of this dinancc, exc€pt:
a) any sewage disposal system for which a
permit was issued priq to the cffective datp of this
chapter Frsrat ao thc provisions of sectios E500
thro.4h 8508 of rhis codc; orr
b) any fudividual sewage disposal systcm main-
tained by a public cntity urder ad in accodance
with rcgulations satisfactory to the Health Officer.
Notwithstading the prcceding provisions of this
sectioq this chapter is applicablc to all scptic ank
(4.E4) l
4.E4050 Enforcemeat
It shall be the dlty of tbe Health Officer or his
duly authcize<t rcpresentative to enforcc the provi-
sions of this chaptei' and the rcgulations issrcd
thereunder. (Prior co& $ 4894; M. 2715,
nrBtn)
i
I
4.E4.060
Hearing Officer shall sct a hearing within fiftecn
days. The appellaat shdl be given notice dcrcof, at
the address shonrr on dp +pe"l, by rcgistercd or
ccrtificd rnail. At the conclusion of the hearing, the
Comty Hearing Officer shall rcndet a decision
which shall be final. (Prior codc $ 495; Ord. 2715,
t2I23t&)
4ilfr10 !f,ealtho6cu'defined.
The term "I{ealth Offrccf' rneans the San lt[ateo
County Hcahh Officcr or his authodzed rcprcscnta-
tive. (Pric code $ 49m' N.n$,nf?3,BO)
tl.t4.0g, 'IlldYid[el serage dnposel
syslcm" defincd.
Thc tcrm "individual sewagc disposal systcm"
means and inclu&s any system of piping, treehcnt
&vices c other frilities (excluding chemical toi-
lets) that sfores, cmvcys, tseats c disposes of scw-
agc which is dischcged iao o6cr than a prblic
sewer systartt. A sepic ank systc[D is inchdd in
this dcfuition of m furdividual sewagc disposal
systeno- (Prior codc ! 4901; OnL n$, l2l23l8())
4il.090 'Persou? defincd.
The tern terson" shall include any person, firm,
associatioo, corporaaio or any rembcrq ageats or
employees of tbe forcgoing- (Pric co& ! 4902;
oId-n$,nn3t8o)
4.t4.1q) Ccrtificate of inspecton
Following tbc cornplaion of an individual sewage
disposal sysrcm in acordance with the provisions
of scctions 8500 through 8508 of tbis co& and
payrEnt of the nornul septic ank permit fces, a
certificatc of inspection shall be issued by the
Health Officer. The certificate of inspeaion shall be
valid fc tree (3) ycars.
Tbe prcccdiry provisioas of this section sh"ll aot
apply to sepic tank systems g.anred an exempioo
to the prohibition contained in rcsolution 767 of the
Califomia Regional Warcr Quality Coorol Boarrd,
Saa Francisco Bay Regro4 dated April n, ln6,
wtich pertains to the Emcrald hke Hills arca and
Oak Knoll Maor area of Saa Mareo County. The
owners of thosc scpic tant sysiems must firnish
one of the following to the llealth Of,Ecer no later
than March l, 19El:
a) Proof that th scpic tent has been punped
by a licensed sepic tank pumper within the tk€e (3)
ycar period immediatcly preceding March I, l9E1;
or
b) Proof satidaclory to the Heafth Officer rhrr
such pumping is not nccassary for the Fotectiotr of
public health, safcty ad welfare.
Upon rcceip of tte necessary proof, a certificate
of inspection shall bc issed by the Healtt Officer.
The cenificate of impection shall bc valll for three
(3) years. (Prior codc 0 4910: Ord. nl5, l?r'23l80\
4.E4.110 Trleuia:l inspcctron and rencvel
Every irdividual sewage dispocal sy$em shall be
subje.t to a triemial inspcctioo by rhe IIeaItfi Offi-
oer to assurE its cmtinued proper fimctioning aod
for the prpose of reocwing tbe ccrtifrcare of inspec-
tion. The Health Officcr shall renew a ccrtificate of
inspecrion for a thec (3) year period when the
following conditions have bccn met
a) A repoft of inspcction of the individual dis-
posal system by the Health Officer indicates th^r the
system is operating in a satisfactory rnanner.
b) Proof of sepic tank pumping by a licensed
sepic unk pumper is submitte4 when such pump
ing is rtquir€d by thc rcport of the Health Officer.
c) Proof of rcpairs or alteratios o an individual
scwage disposal system is srbmittc{ wlrcn srch
rcpairs have becn requircd by the report of the
Healtb OfEcer-
d) Payrrcnt of a $So.fi) renewal fee is nade o
drc County Healdr DepartrEnL (Prior code g 491l;
&d.n5,nn3tn)
4&.1:m Defcc{ive srstems.
Following the trbrnial inspection covercd abovg
if an individual sewage disposal system is found to
be defective, the prior Certificate of Inspection may
be extended for a period not to exceed six (6)
months beyood its normal expiration date, provided
thal correctivc nre rsurcs as recommended by the
(4.U)2
(
I
j
4.U.120
Health Officer are being undertaken. (Prior code $
4912; Ord. n$, Dn3lW)
4t4.130 Revocation of certificate of
inspec{ion
Thc llcatth Officcr may revoke any certificate
issued hereunder if he determines that ttre individual
sewage disposal system does not comply with the
provisions of this code, any regulations issued there-
under, or the conditions of the ccrtificate. (Prior
code $ 4913; Orrd. n$,l2n3ft0)
I
II
i
(4.U) 3
i
C}lrprIf, 4.Y2
STORAGE OF IIAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Sections:
4.v2250
4.y2260
4.y22'O
4.922tN
4.v2.tn
4.i!nil()
4.v2310
4,9,23in
4gBn
4.92.01O
ContbuiDg vfuletioos.
Concealment
Civil pemlties
AdminisEetive cDforcemeDt
POWer$
Rcquirements [ot crcl[sive.
Disdainer of liabllity.
Regulrtorc"
ConOid with other lews
Scverabiltty.
4.y2.010
4:vlum
4.vLUO
Purpoee.
General obligation--Safety
and care.
Specific oHigation
Definitioos.
MrGrbls regutatea.
Contelnment of bezardous
Det risb.
New onderground slorge
fecilities.
Other undcrground storage
frilidcs.
Variance.
Abendoncd odcrgroud
ctor.ge te*s.
Unauthorfued rtleascs-
Reporting and recording
rtquircmcnts md recordiry
requirrmcnfs.
Unauthorized
releases-Reprirs
Unauthorized relcrscs-
C'leaoup responsibility.
hHic pardcipation-
Unauthorized rrlcescs-
Indennificaliou-
Eadlin& cmcrgery
procedurcs
and access.
Ioq*ctioos and rccord*
Authority.
tospccOons.
Maintenance of recor.ds.
Reqnimnt for permit
Requircd inlormafion for
permit applicstion
Approvd of permit
Fees for permlt
Criminal p€naltics-
4.92.0E0
4.y2.tto
4.9/2.@0
4lvLtlm
4.YL01O huposc.
Thc purpose of this chapter is the p(fiectiotr of
hcalth, lifc, rcsourccs, ald property thrwgh peven-
tioo and control of nnauthorizcd dischargcs of haz-
ardors matcrials in uadcrgromd storage tenks. (Pri-
or code $ 491; Ond. 2865,Onfl$)
LyLtm Geocral obligation -Safcty and
cara
(a) No persoa firm or corporation shall causc,
sufrer, or peunit ttc storage of hazardous materials:
l. In a nranner which violatc.s a provision of this
cha$er or any other tocal, fedenl, or state sta t€,
code, rule or rcgulation relating to hazardors materi-
ds; or
2. In a manner which causcs an unauthorized
discharge of hazardous materials fi poses a signifi-
cart risk of such unauthorized discharye.
O) The Health Officer shall have discretion to
exeqt ar appliarion ftom any specific requircrncnt
of this chapter, ofrer than tbc requirement for sec-
ondary containrnem in undergroud storage facili-
ties. (Prior code ! 491.1; Ord.2865, l2Dtl83;Ord.
3687, tut4tgs)
4,9L030 Specific ob[gation
(a) Any person, finu orcorporatioa which sorcs
any d,at€rial rcgulated by section 4.92.050 which is
not cxcluded by other sections of this chaptcr shall
otrtain and keep curent a llazardous Macrials Stor-
age Permit
(b) All srch hazardous materids shall be con-
taiDed in conformity with sections 4.92.0@ ro
4.92.Xn
4-v2.tx
4.yltq
4.g},t5o
4.y2.160
4-v,"t70
4.vl'tat
4.v2.19t)
4.v2ffi
4.y2ztt
4.92-Xn
4g2A$
4-y22AO
4.yL030
4.vLN)
4q2.050
4.yLlmo
(4.v2:\ I
4.92.030
4.92.08O of this chapter. (Prior code I 4971.2; M.
.865, nnOA3)
4.Y2.W lhfnitions,
Unlcss otherwise cxpr€ssly stat€4 whenever used
in this chapter, the following terms shall have the
rneadngs sct fordr bclow:
(a) Abandone4 when Eferring to a seorage facili-
ty, mans out of servicc and not safeguarded in
compliance with rhis chap&r.
(b) Frcility rEars any onc, or combinarion of,
underground storage rrntr ussl by a single business
€Dtity at a single location c sitc.
(c) Ilazardor Ivlalerial or Substance uEans any
matcrial whicb is $bFct to regulation pursuatrt to
scction 4.92.050 of this chapcr. O .;rsrrs shrlt be
deerDcd to be a hazadors material or srtbstaoce if
it is a waste aDd cotrtains any natcriat rcgularcd
pusuant to sectioD 4.92.050 of this chaprer.
(d) Officcr means ttc County llealth Officer or
any desigm of srch employcc.
(c) Pcrmit Quantity Limit rncans the mximum
"mout of hazardous maredal 6ar can be stq€d io
storage facility. scparatc p€rmit quastity limits
will bc set for cach storagc facility for which a
permit is obtaincd in accordarrce with the rcquire-
mens of this chapter.
(f) This section not ctrrently in usc.
(g) Owncr means tte owncr of an
storage tank or facility.
(h) Opcrator mans the opcrator of aa un&r-
grorrtrd stmge tank or facility.
(i) Person nrans an individuat, trust, frnr, joint
stock corDpany, corporation, including a governnrnt
corporation, paftrership, and associatior. person also
includes any city, Connty, distict the Stare, or any
department or agency thereof.
() Pipe nreans any prpeline or sysem of pipe-
lincs which is used in cqurection with thc storage
of hazardous substances and which are not intenH
to transport hazadous substances in interstate or
intrasatc comnrercc 6 to tra$fer hazardqts materi-
als in bulk to or from a marine vessel.
G) nimary cootairrent nrans thc first level of
:otrtaiunent, i.e., t[c iaside portion of that container
which comcs into immcdiar€ contact on its inncr
surface with the hazardous material being contair€d-
Q Product-Trght rreans iryerviols to th€ slF
stance which is conraind or is to be contained, so
as !o prevent thc s€epage of the substarrce from the
primary containrnem. To be product-tight, the taok
shall not be subjecr to physical or chemical deterio-
ration by the srbstance which it conains over the
usefirl life of the ank
(m) Secondary Conainrnent means the level of
contaiuDent external to and separare from the pri-
mary containrrcnf
(n) Single-Walled nEarrs comtntction with walls
made of but one thickness of material. I-aminate4
coate4 or clad marerials $all be coosidered as
single-walled.
(o) Special frspectors rneaas a professional engi_
neer rcgistered punuant to Business aod profession_
al Code, who is qualified !o dest, at a minimum,
to stnrctml s@DdDess, seismic safety, the coryati-
bility of constuction Eaterials with cooteots, cath-
odic prorection, and the roechanical compatibility of
the snnrcorral elcEcnts.
(p) Substantially beueath the srfacc of the
gromd means that at least lO perccat of the under-
gound tank syslem volutDe, including the volume
of atry connectcd piping is below the ground str-
facc or cnclosed below earthen maErials.
(q) Storage o Storc nrans tbe containmetrt,
handling or treamrent of hazardous substances,
eitlcr oo a tcrqrorary basis or for a pcriod of years.
Storage or stoe does not mean the storage of luz-
ardous wasnes in an underground storage tank if the
penon operating the Ank has been issued a h,,ard_
ous waste facilities permit.
(r) Unauthorizcd Rebase means any rclease or
emission of any hezardo.s $bstaDce which does not
conform to tbe provisions ofthis chapter, unless this
release is authorized by tte State Water Resourccs
Contol Board pursuant to division 7 (comnrencing
with section 1300) of the Warer Code.
(s) Underground Storage Facility rneans any one
or combination of t.nks, including pipes connected
thereto, which is used for the storage of hazardous
(4.92.) 2
\
substanccs ard which is substatrtialty or totally
bqrcadl 0tc surfacc of thc ground.
@ Un&rgrumd storage tanks rneans any one or
combination of anks, including pipes connec-tcd
tlrereto, which is uscd for the storagc of hazadous
sukarrccs and which is subsuntially or torally
bcneattr thc srface of the ground. For the purposes
of permiting, monitoring ard nrvcillance, 'Under-
gronDd stmge tank" does not itrcludc th€ following:
(1) A tank with capacity of l,l(X) gallons or less
which is locatcd on a farm and which stores motor
vchiclc fircl uscd primarily for agrioilural purposcs
aod mt for r€sale.
(2) A tank which is locarcd on a farm q at the
ttsidmce of a pcrsons, which bas a capacity of
1,100 galloos o lcss, od which storcs horrc heat-
ing oil for consumptive use on the premises wherc
stff€d- A oil vhich is ro loger uscd to stoG
hooe hearing oil oa a fam ot residence, fi motor
vehich fircI on a fann is oot exempt 1io6 r-'rk
closurc, release rcporting and hitial abatcment, or
corr€ctivc actio requircmcnts.
(u) Board rreans ttc Stare Warcr R€souxces Coo-
trol Boqd. Rcgional boad meaos a California rc-
gional water Sality cootrol board.
(v) SMCEH rreans San Mateo County Enviroo-
nrenal Health Dvision. (Prior codc ! 49f 3; Ord.
2855, l2DilE3; Ord. 3687, lVt4/95)
4.9rlll50 Mat€rials regulat€d"
I{azardous matcdals shall be regulatcd by this
clraptcr. 'Iazardous rraterialsl nrcans all of the
following liquid and solid substances, unless the
Cdifomia Envircnrnental Protectiott Agency
(CaUEPA), in consultation with the Stale water
Resouces Control Boar4 determines the srbataoce
could not adversely affect the quality of warcrs of
tle *ate:
(l) Petroleum.
(2) Substanccs on thc list preparcd by th€ Dfu€c-
tor of the Department of ldustial Relatioas pursu-
ant to section 6382 of the kb6 Code.
(3) Hazardos srbstances, as defid ia section
25316 of the lledth and Safety Code.
4.y2.w
(4) Any matcrial which is classffied by the Na-
tional Fire Protection Association (NFPA) as a
flammable liqui4 a class II combustible liquid, or
a class Itr-A combusrible liquid.
(5) The comprchensive nraster list of hazardors
matcrials compiled by the CaUEPA Pursua to
Health and Safety Code section 25281.
(6) Any nraterial which has been detcrminetl to
bc hazardous based on any appraisal or assessrent
by or oo behalf of the party stodng fte malerial in
compliarce with the requircrnents of the Fcdcral
EPA or CaVEPA or which shotrld have bcco, but
was not, dctermfurcd to be hazardous duc to lte
&liberarc failurc of the party storing thc matcrial to
courply with the rcquirenrns of the F*ral EFA
aod/c CaUEPA
(7) Any maadal which has been daemoircd
tfuough testitrg or otler objective nrcans, to be
likely to deate a sipificant potcntial or rcoal haz-
ard o Erblic hcalth, safety a welfare. This subsec-
tion shall not establish a requirernent to t€st for tbc
Frposes of this chapter. (Prior code $ 4972; Od.
2865, l2l&l83; Ord. 3587, llll4l95: Ord. 3737,
9rut94
4.CLM Containment 6f hae rdo6s
m.terisls.
(a) No persoo, firm or corpcarion shall s3orc any
hez'rdous matcrials in undcrSrouod seorage tanks
rcgulated by this chapter uatil a penuit or approval
has been issued pur$ant to rhis chapt€r and to
Chaptcr 6.75 of the Health and Safety Code aod the
Chapar 18, Trtle 23 regulations. No permit or ap
proval shall be granted pursuant to this chapter
unhss p€rmit applicant dermostrarcs to the satisfac-
tioo of SMCEII by the obmissio of appropriarc
plans and other infonnatioo, tlnr the design and
coostmction of the storage facility will rEsult in a
suitablc manner of storage for the hazardous rnateri-
al or rnaterials to be contained thercin.
(b) All installuion, const rction, repair or modifi-
cation, closure, and removal shall be to the satisfac-
tion of SMCEH which shrll have tbe discretion to
impose reasonable additional or different require-
ments in order to better securc the purpose and
I
I
(
(4.92) 3
4.92.m
fneral obligation of this chapter for protcction of
public hcalth, safety, and welfarc. (hior code g
4973; M. 2E65, DAUE3; Ord. 3687, tlll49i;
Ord.3737,9nq96)
4glt O Ncr ulderground storage
frilities.
Every undcrground storage tank insalled aftcr
January I, 19E4, shrll neet tho following rcquire-
nrcDts:
(a) Be designcd aod coasfucr.d to provide pri-
mary and sccondary hvels of containmat of the
hazardous substanccs stored in thcm in accordance
with ttc following performacc statrdads:
(l) Primry containmcnt shall bc prcdrct-tight-
(2) Secoudary containrrcnt chell gg constuctrd
to preveDt stnrcEral weatening as a rcolt ofcontact
with any relcased hazardors substanccs, and also
shall be capable of storing, for thc rmxirrnm antici-
patcd period of tirne neccssary fr thc rccovcry of
any rcleased hazardous sbstance.
(3) In thc case of an insallation with ore primary
'gntainer, thc secondary cootainrncot shall be largc
..,nough to cootain at leas 100 percent of tte volunp
of ttrc primry oak.
(4) In the casc of multiple primary anks, the
sccondary container shall be largc cnough to contain
150 perccnt of the volunre of tlrc laxgqst prfunary
tank placed in it, or l0 lrrcent of the aggregate
intcmal volunr of all primary tanks, whichcver is
grealct.
(5) If the facility is opcn to rainfall, then the
secondary containnrcm must be able to additiohrtly
accommodate the volume of a 24-hor rainfall as
determined by a 5-year stonn history.
(6) Single-walled containers do not futfill the
requiremcnts of an undergrouDd storage tank provid-
ing for bottr a primary and secondary containrrent
@) Be dasigncd and constructed with a mouitor-
ing sysrem capablc of derecting the cntry of the
hazardous malerid stored in tb primary cotain-
rDent into the sccondary containrnent. If watcr could
intnrde into tlrc secondary contaiDm€nt, a means of
monitoring for water inousion and for safety renov-
'ng the waer shall alrc be provided.
(c) A mcans ofoverfill protcction for any prirna-
ry Unlq including an overfill preventiot dcvice or
an atention-getting high level alan[ or both shall
be provided. Pdnrary taDk filling opcrarions of un-
dergrourd storagc tanks contaiDing motor vehicle
fuels which are visually monitored and controlted by
a facility operator satisfu thc rcquiremcnts of dris
paragraph.
(d) Dffercnt srbarances tha in combination may
cause a firc or explosion, or the production of flanr
mable, toxic, or poisonous ga$ or thc dcterioration
of a prirmry or s€condary conaircr, shall bc sepa-
ratcd in both thc prirnary and sccondary containnrent
so .s to avoid pocntial int€rmixing.
(c) If waicr corld cnt€r into thc secondary con-
tainment by FEipitation or infiltation, the facility
sh^ll coatain a rnens of rernoving the warcr by the
owrrcr or op€rator. This rermval systcm shall alrc
provide for a rncans ofanalyzing the rennved wat r
for hazardcxrs substaocc contamination ard a means
of disposing of the warcr, if so conaminate4 at ur
authorizcd disposal facility. (Prior code I 4973.1;
Ord-2865, |2I?JJE3; Ord. 35E7, ttlt4&S)
4.y2.(E0 Othcr undergrourd slorage
facilitics.
For every underground storagc tar* installed on
or before January l, 1984, and used for the storage
of hazardous subsiances the following actions shall
be taken:
(a) On or before January I, 1985, the owner shall
oufit thc facility with a monitoring systcm capable
of detccting unaurhorized releascs of any hazardous
substances stor€d in tb facility, and thereafter, the
opcrator shall rnonitor each facility, bascd on matc-
rials stor€d and thc typc of monitoring installed.
O) Provide a rneans for visual inspcction of the
tank, whercver practical, for tlre purpose of the
monitoring requircd by (a). If visual
moaitoring is not possible, thc tank owner/operator
shall usc a quantitativc c qualitative monitoring
method as described in Catifornia Code of Reguta-
tions, fitle 23, Dvision 3, Ctailel 16, Article 4,
section 2643 through seaion 264E. (prior code g
4973.2; M. ?fiS, t2t20t83; Ord. 3687, tyt4tgs)
(4.92) 4
I
!
I
I
i
49LO9O Veriuce.
(a) It is th€ int€nt of this ordinance to protect thc
public hcalth ad safety and enhancc warcr quality
while rcspcc'ting 0rc rights of privarc propctty own-
ers cconomically viable use of land. It is not the
intcnt of this ordinarce to prohibit .ll economically
viable usc of private lands, nor to tesult in a confis-
caffy impact Accordingly, the purpose of this
scctioo is to providc for ao adminisrraive procedur"
for a wainer of urodificaion of a particrrlar provi-
sion of ttis ordinance in thc event that thc strict
apptcarion of this ordinance would rcsult in the
denial of all economically viable usc ofrcal propcr-
ty.
(b) An applicaot for a waiver of a provisioo of
this odinare sball file a waivcr application with
the Dlrecror of thc Dvision of Environrrental
Hcalth oo a fum prwidcd by the Dfucaor i&ntifr-
ing fu provision sought to be waived or modificd
Thc applfo:ant sbatl file a conphtc fqur and shall
provi& all doctuentation and infamarion rcquted
by the Dircctc to determine whethcr aplication of
the pmvision in questim will prohibit any economi-
cally viable usc of tlrc land in guestion or otherwise
have a coafiscatory impact
(c) The Director may apFove, deny, or condi-
tionally approve a waiver application upon deter-
mining whahec
(l) Thc application of dre provision in qucstio
will ptrohibit any econoruically viablc use of the
land in qucstim c otfierwisc havc a coofiscatory
r€sulr
(2) Approval of such a waiver will not result in
a prblic nuisaoce which wqrld cotrstitrte a direct
threat to thc prblic hcal6 and safety.
(3) A waiver granted un&r this sectioo must bc
coosistcnt with Sate law and regulatiolrs.
(d) The determination made by the Director of
Envirmnpntal Health o any waiver applicarioo
shall be frral. (Prior codc $ 493.3; ffi. 2865,
l2l2OE3: N. 3687, I l/ltl/95; Ord. 3737, gtAl$)
4.yLI.l0/| AboodonedmdergrouDdstorage
tarks.
(a) No person shall abandon an un&rground
4.92.@O
storagc tank or close or t€rqorarily cease oFrating
an un&rground storage tanlq cxcept as providcd itr
this sieclion. This sectioa applbs to underyoud
storage tanks subject to permining and monitodng
rcquirerrcnts as well as honr heating oil and agri-
culoral tanks I 100 gallons or bss in capacity.
G) en unaerglonod storage tank which is tempo-
rarily takcn out of servicc, but which the peison
intetrds to rcorm to use, within the next 12 consecu-
tive rmnths, shall continue to be subirct to all the
permif inspectioo and monitoring rcquirernens of
this chapter, unless the perso cornplies with the
pr,oyisiou of paragraph (c) of this section for tlrc
period of time the underyrflDd ront is not in utc,
(c) Any person shall coryly with all of thc fol-
lowing rcquirernents to compleE and mairtain tcrn-
porary closure of any un&rground storage tark:
(l) All rcsidual lhui4 solids or sludges have
becn rcmoved and handled in accordance wirh the
applicabtc provisions of Chapter 65 and 6.7 of
Division Z) of the Health and Safcty Code.
(2) If thc storage tank corftaid a
substance th,t could producc flammble vapors at
standard t€mperatue and pressure, it shall be inertcd
as often as necessary, to levels that will preclude an
explosioo or to lower levels as rcquired by the local
agency.
(3) The underground slorage tanl( may be filled
with a noncorrosivc liqdd that is not a hazardous
subsance. This liquid shall be tcsted and test rc$lts
submined to thc locd agency prior to removal from
the underground storage tank ar the eDd of the tem-
porary closurc period.
(4) Exccp for required venting, all fill and access
locatioos and prpins shall be sealed using locking
caps or concrete plugs.
(5) Power scrvice shall be disconnected from all
prnps associared with the use of the underground
storage t nk unless the power services other equip
rncnt which is not being closed, $rch as imprcssed-
current cathodic Fotcction system-
(6) The undergound storage tank shdl be in-
spected by said perrcn at l€rBt otrc€ every three
mnths to verify that thc temporary closure nrca-
sules iu€ still in place.
(4.y2) s
i
4.92.|N
(7) At the ctrd of the tcmporary cloourc period
rid person may rcuse thc underground storage tank
only if thc tant ttreCtS thc rcquircnrnts for oew
underground stonge tanks or is upgraded to nret
the rcquircrncats of CC& Titlc 23, Chapter 16,
Aniclc 6, wticn 266.2.
(d) Persons with rcsponsibility for undcrground
storage rnts subject o permanent closure shall
comply with eithcr paragraph (l) fo underground
storage tank rcmoval or paragraph (2) for clocure in
place. It is not cssential that aII porti@s of an
uodcrgouod soragc tent bc pcrmanendy closed ia
thc sorrc rnanner; howcvcr, all cloote actions shall
bc coodrced in accodance with ltis scction. Para-
eraphs (3) and (a) apply to a[ un&rgurnd srcage
tanks srbjcct to pennaocnt closure.
(l) Fcrsons with rcsponsibility for un&rgrwnd
storagp iks subjecl to pentrancDt closurc shall
comply with applicable provisions of Chaptcr 6.5 of
Division 20 of the Halth and Safcty Code aod with
the following rcquir"rrcnts: a) All rcsidud hpid
solids, or sludges shall be removd and handled as
hazadous waste (x rccyclable matedal iD accor-
rncc with Chapter 65 of t[e Ilealth and Safety
Code; b) If tb undergroud storage tank contaircd
a hazardous substancc that could goduce flammable
vapofs at standard temperaturc and prcssure, it shall
be inerted !o levels that shall precludc explosion or
to lower levels as required by SMCEII; c) All utr-
dcrgound storage r.nk< or aoy part ther€of subject
to perrmnent closurc shall be managed as hazardous
waste. The Frson rrsponsible for tlre underground
sorage taok shall docurrent o SMCEH rhat pioper
disposal has been completed
(2) Persons with esponsibility for undergrormd
storage rnks subject to p€ntrarrcnt closurE where the
tanks arc approved to be closed in place shall com-
ply with the applicable provisions of Chapters 6.5
and 6.7 of Dvision 2O of rh€ Hedth and Safety
Code and with tlre following requirements: a) Clo-
sure in place shall only be approvcd in situations
wherc urderground $oragc tank removal will
jeopadize the stuctral integrity of a building or
othcr perrnanent structr€; b) All residual liquid,
:lids, or sludges shall be removed and haodled as
a hazardorxi waste or rccyclable material in ccor-
dance with Chaptcr 65 and 5.7 of thc tlcalth and
Safcty Code; c) If the undcrground storage rrnk
6qntained 4 hazatdous substance that could producc
flamrnable vapors af standard temperaturc and pres-
sure, it shall be incrted o lcvels that shell preclu&
explosion or to lower hvels as may bc rcquircd by
SMCEH; d) A[ piping associarcd with the under-
gIutnd storagc taDt sball be rpmorrcd and disposd
of unless the rcmoval might damage sEucoues o(
other pipes that are being usd ad that arc
cortaid in a common tench, in which case the
piping to be closed shall be cmpied of all contcns
and cappcd; e) Thc undergrurnd storage tank, ex-
cept for piping that is eryticd ad c4ped shall be
compktely filld with an ircrt solid.
(3) Any person rcsponsible fc an underground
storage ta[t bcing cloacd pursuatrt to rhis scction
shall demonsrac o the satisfrtion of SMCEH that
no nnautho!'i'rd rclease bas occurred. This
&monst-atim shall bc based m rcil saryle analysis
and/or water aaalysis if water is prcsent in the exca-
vation. This aoalysis shall be performed during or
immediately after closurc activities. If the dernon-
st-ation is based on soil sample arulysiq soil sam-
ples shall be taken and analyzed as follows: a) If the
underground storage tank or any portion thereof is
removed soil samples shall be taken imrnediarely
beneath the rcmoved portioas of the tank, a mini-
mum of two feet into native rmterial at each end of
the t'nk. A separatc saurple shall be Aken for eacl
20 lineal-feet of tench for piping; b) If rh€ under-
glulnd storage tank or any portion thereof is not
rcmove4 at least one boring shall be taken as closc
as possible to the midpoint bc6afr the tonk using
a slant boring (nechanical or manual), or other
appropriate rnethod such as venical borings drilled
on each long diruensioo siale of the rank as approved
by SMCEII; c) Soils shall be amalyzrd for all con-
stituents of ttc prcviolsly stored hazardous sub-
stances and their brcakdown or transformation prod-
ucts. SMCEH may waive the rcquircrnent for analy-
sis of all constitrcDts, brEakdown or transfornation
product when key conslihrcnts that pose a sigrificant
(4.92) 6
(
!
!
I
i
I
I(
threat to watcr quelity or the envircnfipnt can bc
identifred for analysis.
(4) The detection of any reportable unauthorized
rclcase shall rcquirc compliance with tte applicable
rcquirerrens of sections 4.y2.ll0 and 4.92.130 of
this chapter. (Prior code I 4973.4; tu. 2865,
l?lTE3: N. 1687, lllt4l95: M. 3737, 9t7tl96)
4;YLI'lO Uneuthorized releases-
Reporting ed record4
rcquiraocnts.
(a) Any unautbcized release ftom th pimary
contaittEnt which the operator is able to cbanup
withio cigtt hours, and which does not escape ftom
thc sccondary containrcnt, does Dot increae thc
hazard of fire c explosion aod docs not cause any
dercrioration of the sccondary conainrnent of thc
undcrgoud stomge tank shall be rcportcd by tlr
operator to thc llcdth Officcr wi6in Z hors of
detcctio, ud shall bc rrcorded on tte operetor's
mooitoring rcports. Thc operator's mmitoriDg rc-
conds shall include:
(l) The operator's narrc and tclephorc numbq;
(2) A list of thc typas, qumtities, and coocentra-
tions of haz:rdous substanccs released;
(3) A dcscription of the rtions taken to coutrol
and clean up the rclease;
(4) The mcthod and location of disposal of the
releascd hazardous substances (the mmitoring re-
cord shdl indic.te wlrerhr a hazardors waste maoi-
fest was or will be used);
O) the inteerity of the secondary containrrent
shall be reviewed for possible detcrioration under
the following conditions:
(l) Hazardous substances in contact with tbe
containnent is not compatible with the
material used for secondary containment;
(2) The sccondary cootai neot is prooe o rne-
chaoical &mage from the nrechanical equipment
uscd to remove or clean up tte hazardous subetance
collccted in the seconday containroenq or
(3) Ilazardor substances, o6er than those storcd
in the primary conuinrrcnt systenL arc added to thc
secondary containment to treJrt or neutralize tlre
released hazardous $rbstance and the added suts
4.92.|W
stance or rcsulting substance form soch a combin*,
tion is not compatible with tlrc secondary contain-
menL
(c) Any unalhmized release which escapes from
tlrc sccondary containment, incrcases the haz-id 6;
firc or explosion, or causes any dctcrioration of the
secondary containnrent of the underground tank
shall be reported to the Health Officer by the opera-
tor wittin Z hours after the release has beerr det€ct-
ed or shorld have becn &tected. A full wrftren
report shall bc tlansmined to drc Health Officer by
the owncr or operalor of the urderground storagc
unks within five wo*ing days of thc occurrcnce of
the rclease. The report rhill dcscdbe tihe oatrrc aDd
volurnc of tb uauthorized rcleasc, any comective
or renredial actions uodenaken, ard any further
con€ctive or rcmedial actions, including investiga-
tive actios, which will be nccdd to clean up thc
uoauthorized release and abaL the effects of thc
releasc and a tirne sche& ,e for irylcmenting thesc
acfios.
(d) Thc Hatth Officcr shall rcvicw the pennit
whenevcr thetc ha. been an unauthorizcd deasc c
when thc Health Offic€r determines that the under-
ground storage tank is unsafe. In determining whetF
er to modify or termirate the permit, the Health
Officer shall consider thc age of tlre tank, the rnetF
ods of containment, the rrethods of monitoring, th€
feasibility of any required rcpairs, the concenuztion
of thc hazardous substanccs sored in dls tant, thc
severity of potential unauthorized releases, and the
suitability of any other lmg-rcrm preventive nra-
sures which would rneet the requirerrcnts of this
chapter. (Prior code $ 4973.5; Ord. 2865,121?nA,3;
Ord. 3687, lltt4l95)
4.92JJn Unauthorized rehases-Repairs
If therc has becn any unaurhorized release, as
defin€d in 4.92.1l0(a) and (b), frorn an un&rground
storage tank cootaining motor vehicles fuel not
under pressrre, the permit holder may rcpair the
tank once by an i erior-coating process il the ank
meets all of the following requfurments:
(a) An ultrasonic test, or comparable tesr, has
been condrrcted to determine the thickness of rhe
(4.y)r 7
I
I
I
I
!
i
I
I
!
I
:
I
:
4.E2.120
storage tank. If the result of the test indicates that
- serious corrosion problem exiss with regard to the
tanh or if the trnk's avenrge rnctal thickness is less
tllan 75% of the original wall thickness, or if the
tank has an open split or seam longerthao 3 inches,
a perfaation larger than ore alrd one half inches in
diarncter except dircctly below a gauging opening
at thc bottom of a tank where the perforation shall
be no largcr than nro and one half inches in dianrc-
ter, five or nrcre perforations in any one square foot
area, or multiple perforations of which any single
perforation is larger than one half inch in diameter
the Health Officer may rcquire additional cqrosion
protcction for the taok or rnay deny the authoriza-
tion to rcpair.
O) A vrcuum test has been conducted with a
result indexed at not morc than 53 inches of rcrcu-
ry. This requircnrnt shall not be applicable if tech-
nology is not available for testing the ank on site
using accepcd enginecring p,ractices.
(c) Following r€pair, the standard installation
testing for requircments for underground storage
.aDks specified in scctim 2-7-3 of 0re Flarnrnable
3rd Combusible LiErids Code, by the National Firc
Protection Association on November 2O 1981
(NFPA 3G1981), and published in the 1982 edition
of ttre National Fire Code shall be followed.
(d) The material used to repair the tank by an
interior-coating Focess is compatible withthe motor
vehicle fircl 6at is store{ as approved by the State
Warcr Rcsources Control Board by rcgulation.
(e) Thc malerial used to repair the tenk by an
interior-coating process is applied in accordance
with nationally rccognized engineering practices
such as the American Petroleum Instinrte's recom-
mended practice no. 163l for the interior lining of
exising storage tanks.
(0 Any rcgulations developed by the State \Marcr
Resources Control Board, in consultation with the
State Firc Marshal, for the rcpair of underground
storage t nks, and the standards in this section shall
rernain in effect until the adoption of these regula-
tions. (Prior code $ 4T13.6; Ord. 2865, l2l2Ol83:
Ord.3687; llll4l95)
4.y2.13O Unauthorized releases-{leanup
responsibility.
Any person, firm or corporation responsible for
storing the hazardous matcrid shall instinrrc and
complete all actions necessary to rcmedy the effects
of any unauthorized discharge, whether zudden or
gradual. These actions shall include but not be limit-
ed to &e procedurcs outlined in CC& fitle 23,
Division 3, ChaEer 16, Articlc 5 for release rcpon-
ing requirements and Article 11 fq corrective action
requiremens. The Heatth Officer shall undertake
actions to rcrnedy tlp effects of such unauthorized
discharge itself, only if it detcrmines that it is rea
sonably necessary under the circumstances for the
County to do so. The responsible party shall be
liable to rcimburse the County for all costs incurred
by the County in rcnredying the effects of such
unauthorized discharge, furcluding the costs of fight-
ing fires to the extent allowed by law. This respon-
sibility is not conditioned upon evidence of willfrrl-
ness or negligence ofthe party storing the hazardous
material(s) ih causing or allowing zuch discharge.
Any responsible party who undertakes action to
rcmedy the effecrs of unauthorized discharge(s) shall
not be barred by this chapter from seeking to recov-
er appropriate costs and expenditurcs from other
rcsponsible parties unless otherwise excluded by this
chapter or Starc law. (Prior code g 4973.7; Ord.
2865, 0n0l83; Ord. 3687, llll4l95)
4.Y2.1& hblic participation.
For each confirmed unauthorized release that
requires a corrective action plan, SMCEH shall
follow the requirercnts outlined in California Code
of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Article 11,
section n28. (M. 3687, 1lll4l95)
4.Y2.15O Unauthorized releases-
Indemnification
As a condition of the issuance of a permit under
this chapter, the Health Officer may require the
permittee to a$ee in writing O indemnify, hold
harmless and defend the County against any clainL
cause of action, disability, loss, liability, darnage,
cost or expense, howsoever arising, which occurs by
(
(4.y2) 8
(
;
!
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
!
!
:
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
reason of an uafihorized dischargp in coonection
with pcrnittce's operations uder this permit, exccpt
as ariscs from Cornty's sole willfitl act or sole
active regligence. (Prior code $ 49?3.E; Ord. 2865,
l.2r2083)
a.yl.'Il6/D nanOing,emergencyprocedues
and ecess
(a) Dispcnsins ad mixing ofhazadous nareriats
must not be done in such a rmnm as to srbstantial-
ly increase the risk of ao unauthcized discharge.
Whcn hazardous naledals arc movcd into or out of
a storagc frility, they shall remain in tte travcl
patt orly for thc tfurc rasonably necessary to rms-
port tbe hazadous mlcrials aod sch movemcnt
shall be in a tDarmctr which will trot rc$lt in an
rmauthorizat discLarge.
(b) Access to thc stqagc facilirics sball bc sc-
crmd by npaos of fenccs md/or locts. Tbe access
to rhe $orage facilities shall be kep sectrely Iocked
whcn unarcodcd.
(c) Frrergency equipnent shall be provided
which is rcasonable ana appropriac for potcotial
errcrgencies Fescnt d by tb storcd ha"2dotls
natedals. Such equipmcnt shall be rcgulady testcd
and adequately maintained"
(d) Sfurylificd enErBency proce&tas shall be
postcd conspicuously in locations whcrc hazados
materials arc storcd. (Prior code S 4973.9; Ord.
2%5. t2t2U83)
4.92.ll10 Inspoctions end
reords-Authority.
In oder to carry out the purposes of this chapter,
thc Health Officer has the authority spocified in
Health and Safety Code section 25185 with rcspec-t
to any place where undergroud storage tanks arc
locatei, and in He.lth and Safety Code section
25185 with respecr to rcaI prcFrty which is within
|0@ fect of any place wlrcre underground storagc
tanks are locaad. (Prior &, g 494i M.2%5,
zno$3)
4J4I,I.8/D lospoc{ions
(a) The Health Officer shall inspect every under-
4.92.150
ground storage taok withir is juridictiou at bas
once cvery threc years. The prpoce of the inspec-
tion is to dctermine wlrcther thc ank complbs wilh
&sign and construction standards, whether the oper-
aror has monitoled and tcstcd drc ank as required
by the permit and whcther tlre tank is in a safe
operating condition. After an inspection, the Health
Officer shall pepare a compliance rcport detaifing
thc inspection and $all scnd a copy of this rcport
to the permit hol&r.
(b) In addition to, or instead of, the inspectioas
specificd in paragraph (a), the Health Officer rmy
rcquirc thc pcrmit hol& to aryloy, periodically,
spccial inspectors to cooduct an atdit or assessnEot
of thc Frmit holder's facility to dacnnirc whcthcr
the facility complies wili the factors specifid iD
pamgrapt (a) and to prcpare a speaial inspcctioa
rcpoft wid! rccoDlIc.darioos conceming the safc
sorage of hazadors materids at the facility. The
report $all cmAin rccommdatkms cosislent with
thc prrovisions of this chaper, wherc appropriarc. A
copy of the repoit $all be filed with the Health
Of,Eccr at the sarne tirnc thc inspector submits the
report to the permit hoHer. Within 30 days after
receivhg this repot the pernit holder shall file with
the Health OfiEcer, a plan to implement all rccom-
mendations coatained in the rcport or shall dcmon-
strarc to 6c satisfactio of the Health Officer why
thcsc Ecommerdatioos should not be implerrcnted.
(c) The permitec sball pay for each inspcction
a fee as established by rcsohrtion of the Board of
Superisors. (Prior codc I 4914.1; Ord. 2865,
Dm$3)
4.YLtln Maint€Mnce of records.
(a) The operaror of the un&rgroud storage
facility shdl rmnior the facility using the nrcthod
specified on the pennit for the facility. Rccords shall
b€ kcPt in sufficient detail to enable the Health
Officcr to determine the operaror has undertaken all
monitoring activities requi€d by the permit to oper-
"8.(b) If the operator is not the owner, the owner
shall provide a copy of the permit to the operator,
enter hto a wdtten contract with the operator which
{4.n) e
I
!
i
I
i
I
4.y2.tn
\quk€s thc operator to monitor the tank as s€t forth
the permiq and provi& the operator with a sum-
mary of this scction in an approved form. The own-
er shall notiS tbc Health Of6cer of any change of
operaor. (Prior codc I a97 a.2; M. 2865, l2nil$)
4,922m Requirement for pcrmit
(a) Except as provided in scction 4.92.21O, ao
person slrall own or operate an udcrgoud *orage
tank unless a permit for its operatioNt has been is-
sued by thc Health Officer to the oumcr, which
permit shall specify the rnethod to bc used to moni-
tc the facility. All permis arc nontratrdcrabb.
(b) Any Fnon assuming ownenhip of an undcr-
ground storage tank uscd for rhe stcagc of hazar&
orrs substanccs fa which a valid oper:ating permit
has becn issred shatt have 30 days der the darc of
assumpion of ownership to apply fc an op€mting
permit. During the period ftom the datc of aprplica-
tion until thc permit is issrcd or refirsod, thc persm
shall not be held to bc in violation of rtis scctioo.
(c) When, in its judgrnent, it is appropriate to do
'. the Health Officer may issrrc a singte pennit o
.ierson for a facility. Additional approvals shall bc
obtained for any sorage facility thereafler conncct-
ed, itrstdled, construct€4 repaired as rcquired, mb-
stantially modi6e4 rcplaced" closed or rcmoved, or
for any change or addition in hazardous matcrials
storc4 nor in accor&nce with the prior apprcval.
(Priorcode g 4975; Orrrl 2865, |2D.0E3;M.3687,
tvt4t95)
4.92210 Requircd information for permit
application.
(a) An application for a permit to operate an
underground storage tanh or for renewal of the
permit, shall be made, by the owncr, on a standard-
ized form prcpared by the County and provided by
the Health Officer and shall be accompanied by the
appropriate fee.
(b) The Health Ofricer shall store this informa-
tion for the purpose of managing and appropriatety
cross rcferencing and irdexing this dara The appli-
cation form shall include, but not tc limited to,
quests for the following infonnation:
(l) A description of tlrc coosruction of the un-
dcrgound storagc tank or tanks.
(2) A list of all the hazardous substances which
are or will bc sored in the un&rground sorage ank
or tanks, specrfying the hazardous substances for
each uderground saorage tank.
(3) A &scription of the nonitoring program for
the undergrourd storage ank or tanks.
(4) The name and addrcss of the persoq firm, or
corporatioo which owns tbc undergroud storage
tank or tanks an4 if differcn( thc name ard address
of tbc person who operarcs the urderground storagc
ank or tanks.
(5) The address of rhe frility at which the uI}.
storagc taDk or Anks are located.
(6) The narre of 6c perrcn making rhe applica
tion.
(7) The narne and 24-hor phone number of the
coatact person in the evetrt of an em€rgency involv-
ing the facility.
(8) If the owner or operator of thc underground
storage tank is a public agency, tlre application shalt
include the nanre of the supervisor of the division,
section or office which operates thc tank
(c) As a condition of any permit to oFrate an
underground storage tanh the permiuee shalt com-
pletc an annual rcpon fonn" prepared by the Heal&
Officer which will detail any changes in rhe usage
of any undergrornd storage tank, inctuding the
sorage of new hazardous substaDces, changes inmonitoring and unauthorized release
@cruFgnccs,
(d) If a permitee slore.s in an un&rground stor-
age tank or tanks a hazardous substanc€ which is
not listed in the applicarion, as required by para-
eraph (2) of subdivision O), the pcrrnioee shall
apply for a new or anended pennit within 30 days
after commencing the storage of that hazardous
substance. (Prior code g 4975.1; fu. 2E65,
tv20t83)
4.Y2.2O Approval of permit
A permit shall not be approved until the Health
Of,Eccr is satisfied that tlle storage approved ade-
(
(4.92) tO
(
;
I
I
I
I
quatcly cooforms to lhc Fovisions of this chaptcr.
(Prior co& g 4n5.2. fr. 2865, 12120183)
4:I223lt Fces for permit
(a) A fee shall be paid to 6e Coutrty by each
prsoo who submits an application for a peflnit to
operate an urdcrground storage ank or o r€Nlew or
amend a Frmit. Ttre Boad of Supervisors shall
adopt a fee schedule at a level sumcient to pay the
necessary and reasonable cosr hcurr€d in adminis-
tering ttis chaptcr, including, but not limited to,
permiftitrg and inspeaion responsibilities.
(b) This fec shall inclu& a surcharge, the amomt
of wtich $dl be detcrmhcd by the Lrgislaorc
annually to covcr tlrc costs of the Staic WaEr Coo-
tr,ol Boad in carying out its Esponsibilities under
this chaptcr. (Prior code $ 4975.3i Ord. 2865,
Dtxa,
4,922//0 Crimimt penalties.
Any person wbo violates any provisio of this
chaptcr sball be liable for civil and criminal penal-
ties as outlined in lhe Health and Safcty Code,
Chaptcr 6.7, section 2529 or IIeaIth and Safety
Codc, Chapter 6.75, comrnencing with section
25299.t0.
(l) Responsibility for Violations. The owner,
tnaDagpr, or operator of any facility iE rcsponsible
for any violation by an employee of any provision
of this chqter or any rcgulation adopcd purnrant
to this chaptcr. (Prior code I 4976: Ord.2865,
l?12fi 183 : d. 3687, I l/ 14/95; Ord. 37 37, 9lA196)
4.y225t0 Q6afr1ning violatious.
Unless otherwise provided, a penon, finn, corpo-
ration or organization, shall be deeme,i guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day during any
ponion of which a violation of rhis chapter is com-
mitte4 continued or permitred by thc person, fum,
corlrcration, or aganizqtion and shall be puaishable
accordingly as herein provided. (Ord. 3687,
lu14t95)
4.Y22il) Concealuenl
Causing, permiting, aiding, abening or cooccal-
4.92_220
ing a violation of any provision of this chapcr shall
constitutc a violation of such provision. (fu. 3687,
tyt4t95\
4.YLZII Civil penelties
Any persoo who violare,s any pmvisim of this
chapter shall be liable for the civil penalties provid-
ed in *arc law.
(a) Civil Actioos. In addition to any other rerne-
dies providcd in ftis se.tion, ay violatioo of ttis
sectio may be enforccd by civil rctim bFought by
the Couty. In aay such action, the Comty may
scclc as apprcpriatc, any or all of thc folloving
rcmcdics, o( my oth€r such uaody dccrucd appto-
priate by ttc C-ouoty:
(l) A eoporary aad/c peroaneot injunctio.
(2) Asse.ssrcnt of tbe violaror for the costs of
any invesigarioo, or monitoring srvcy
which led to thc establishrcnt of the violation, and
fot the reasonable costs of preparing aad bringing
legal action un&r rhis subscction.
(3) Costs inctued in removing, con€cting, or
terminating the adverse effects from the violation,
including reasonable attomey's fccs aod court costs.
(+) Corrynsatory darmges for loss ordeshrction
to warcr quality, wildlifc, fish and aquatic life.
Ass€ssrrcnts under ttis subsection shall be paid o
the County to be used exclusively for costs associat-
ed with implorenting r caforcing the provisions of
this ordinance. (Prior code g 4976.1; Ord. 2865,
DAO8\ O!d. 35E7, lUl4ygs)
4.y2.N Adrninish ive enforcement
powers
Itr additioo to othcr enforcenrent powers and
remedies established by this cdinance, any autho-
rized Eaforcement Official has the authority to
utilize administrativc rernedies. (Ord. 3687,
1Ut4D5)
4.Y2.XN Remedies Dot cxdusive-
Rcoedies uo&r this chapter are in additiou to
ard do not supersede or limit any and all other legal
remedies and penalties" whcther civil or criminal in
mtlr. (Prior code I 4976.2; Ord. 2865, Wm$3)
(4.92) tt
I
i
I
I
i
j
I
I
i:
I
4-92.m
/.Y2.fit Disdaimer of linbitity.
(a) The degree of protection required by this
chapter is considered reasonable for regulatory pur-
poses. The standards set forth hercin are minirnal
standards and this chaper does not imply that conr.
pliance will enzurc that therc will be 6s rrnaurho.
rized discharge of hazardors malerid. This chapter
shall not create tiability on the part of the County,
any offrcer or employee thereof for any &mages
tha rcsult from reliance on this chapter or any ad-
ministratiye decision lawfully rnadc thercundcr. AII
persons holding, storing, using, proccssing, and
disposing of hazardous materials within the Cornty
should bc and arc advisedtodetermine o thirown
satidactim the level of protection in addition o thar
rcqufud by this chapter occessary or desirable to
ensurc that therc is no unauthuized discharge of
hazardous marcrials. (Priorcode g 4977;Ord- 2865,
t2tzot83)
4.Y2310 Regulations.
The Health Officer shall implemcnt California
^ode of Rcgulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter
ias adoptcd by the State lYater Resources Control
Board January l, 1984, including all zubsequent and
fumre anpndrrents. (Prior code g 4917.1-, N-
2865, l?J2W83; Ord. 368,7, llll495)
4.Y2.gm ConIlict with other laws
Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter:
(a) Wtenever any provisions of this chaprcr
conflicts with any State or Federal rcgulations of
storage facilities, the stricrcr provisions will prevail.
(b) Whenever any provision of this chapter con-
flicts with the Fire Code as adopted by tlre Cornty,
the stricter prcvision shall prevail. (kior cde $
4977 2;Ord. 2865, nn0l83)
4.Y23310 Severability.
If any section, subsection, senterrce, clause, or
phrase of this ordinance is for any rEason held to be
invalid or unconstiurtional by a decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such derision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
": ordinance. The County Board of Supervisors
hereby declarcs that it would have passed this ordi-
nance and each and every section, subscction, sen-
tence, clausc, or phrase not declared invalid or un-
constinrtional without rcgard to whether any portion
of the ordinance would be subsequently declared
invalid or unconstinrtional. (Prior code g 4977.3;
Ord. 2865, QnW$)
(
(4.92) t2
Sections
4.10E 0r0
4.1(4020
410&rxto
.1"108.1XO
Chepter 4l0t
PROEIBITED FTJEI.S
hrpoce.
Dcfuifous
hohiHtrd focls.
Erforrcmcnt
4118010 hrpocc.
This chaptcr is inmdcd !o limit and/6 rcahrcc lt
porticulrtc emissims carscd by 6c buoing of spc-
cifc filcls wi6in fteplaoes, stoves (r rylices"
(Ord".009, lUlglff))
41(n020 Defuitioos.
Fr tbc purpoee of this chqter, the fotbwitrg
16169 ch l hare t[g folloudag rr---ing{:
(a) fireplace" mas aoy pomamdy in<l"ll"d
ltasoDry c fictry-btrih wood borning aplirnce
cxce$ a p€[ct-fiEled wood hcam, designcd to bc
usd with atr air-to-fiEl rario gutcr than c cqual
!o 35 to l.
(U) 'Caatog* msns all soli{ semisolirl md
liqdd wastes generated from rcslkntial cmrocial
aod industrial sqrccq inchding tradl Efuse, ruL
bish, industial wastes, asphdtb prc&rct* rreuq
vegctrbb a animl soli& aod semisolid waseq ad
otk discudcd solid ad scmisolll wascs.
(c) ?aints" meanr all eroiaud intedrbosc
rad trin paints, enamels, vamishcq lac$ers" stains,
pdmx sealcrs, uodcrcoating, rcof coatings, wood
prcscrvatives, $ellacs, and ottcr paints u poitrt-tl(.
pmduc8.
(d) '"aint solvcots" ms all ciginal sohcons
soH or used 6 fiin pints c to clean up FintiuC
equipmt
(c) 'Solid fiteF mos wood q aay other
noogaseos c noliquid firl.
(f) Trcaled woof rcaos wood of aay specis
lhat hs bccn chcmically iryegale4 poiot 4
coatcd c sioiHy nodifed to iqrove rcsist{cc
to iosccB or wearhcdng.
4.108.0r0
G) Arastcp€tohrrEprc&rts"rcaDs mypetG '
r
loro prodrrct olher rrran gascous fircls that hrs bccn I
rcfincd frm cndc oil, ard bas bceo rsc4 ud as a
result of use, has becn cotaminarcd with physical
c chcoirxl iryuritics.
(h)'Wood hlmiry lppliance" r'p-'r< a fttplacc,
wood hcarcr, r pellet-firled wmd hcaler c ay
sirnilr dcvicc hrming wood or oth omgescirr o
Dmliqrdd frEl usd fa acsrhab or splheating
Fnposcs. (Ord-,lflD, l?l9l0l})
tl.108JEt0 hohibitcdlhcls
No perso shen cause r allow thc hming of any
of thc Hhning Drt€rhls in a freplece, stovc c
crood'hrtrg ryliarcc
(a) eelta$;
@) trcalcd wood c wood coqrcitio pmducts;
(c) plertic FodrlctE;
(d) rubbcr podrca;
(e) was pctlohmFoducts, itrcluding trortar
pdpct;
(O paints ud poir solvcnts;
G) cel. (Od 4{XD, l:Ulgtg))
(4.rG) I (36 lr*o Cd, Jar)
4l(n040 Enformnl
Aay pcrsoo violating etry of tte p,rovisios of
Title 4, cbaptet 4.108 shall be guilty of an infrac-
tio.(Oril 4tr9,IAl9fIJ)
5.64.010
5.s-920
5.64-0:X)
5.e-w
5.64.050
s.Gt.060
5.&WO
5.64.(E0
s.64090
s.Gt.100
5.64.110
s.alm
5:64.tr10
5.G.Un
5.81.150
5.@.160
Chapter 5.64
FEXES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF STAlts
PT'BLIC HEALIE I"AIVS
Sections:
tlle Cootry Healh Officer for srch enforcenrent and
in providing sucb services.
(d) Seaim 510 of tbe Califomia tlealth and
Saftry Code grmts aurhodty to the Comty to pre_
scdbe, by rcsolution, fecs thd wilt pay the reason_
able expeoses of the Hcalth Offioer or officers or
employees iDcnrrDd in the enforcenpnt of such
sbAme, order, quaratine, nrl,e m rcgullitions prc_
scribed by a State Officer or departrert relating to
public heahh'which Eqqfues or afihorizes the Coun_
ty tlcalth Officer c Canaty officcrs or ernployces
to perfor.m specified acts. (pdor code g 5521.1; Ord-
?324,t110{8,175; Onil 2514, 6f2AfiB; Ord 3004,ArUlUi Ord. 3009, @t0/,t8!:)
S.AfiA Sope anrl elryIicdioa.
The fees'which are established by resofttion
pursua'tr to the authority of this chaper and seAion
510. of tte lleatth and Safety Code apply to any
business or activity as dcfined fu sectiA S.Oa.OSil
of ttis chapter and to aay other business or activity
as to which the County Hcalth Officer or other
Couoty Officer or eoployee are charged with the
responsibility of cnforcing any sanrte, ordea quar_
antine rule or rcgulation rclaring to public heatth
which are within rlrc geographic area in which the
County Health Officer is rcsponsible for enforcing
Staie $affies, ordcrs, quarantines, rules or rcgula_
tims reluing to the public hcalth aod to any proper_
ty alteruiur or use, as defircd in section SfaiBO
of this chqrer, which occurs ln thc uninborporaed
area of the Cornty. (Prior code ! 5521.3; @:232{
UI tMtT 5 ; d. 25 I 4, O6r2N7 B: M- 3OCli, t1 tZ4tE4)
5.64.030 Respouibility for inspection and
fee olleclion-
The Eovironrnental lleatth Sgvices Dvision.of
the Health Services Agenry shall be rcsponsible for
business inspcction and collertion of fees. (prior
code 0 5521.4; M_ 2324, O7fr8ft5 M. 2514,
05D0n&@,.2636 O3/l U80; Orrt .3OO4,U7D4\A4:
Ord. 3357, tt|t9l; Ord. 3686, ttA4DS; M. 3849,
aq98)
Dcdaraton of Endings.
Scope anil application-
Rcspondbilit5r for ilsIGctioD
ad fee cpllectiotr-
Comty heakD oEcer.
D&itions d certain budnesses
and acfivitie subi$ to
insp.ection fees under &is
ct pt r.
Imposition of recs
Colleotion of fees.
Parhcr$ip
Gcqeral 4rfi'rition
Mafor land {ivision
Mimr land diviioL
Iat line adjufirents.
Imposidon sf fees
Application
Fee amounl
Penalty for late payDert
5.64.0r0
5.6L010 Declaration of fudings
The Boqrd of Sr4ervisors of the.Crntrty of S8tr
Mritco does hereby frnd ard declare as foflorrs:
(a) That thc e:grenses incurred by the Comty
I{ealth Officcr ia the afqcement of certain soartes,
or&rq quarantineg ruIes ad/or r%ulations 1rr€-
scribcd by srate offices or deparumr relating to
public health arc not rmt by any foes prescribed by
the Surc;
(b) I}at the expenscs incurred by the C.ounry
Health Officer in the coforcerre.nt of said staartcs,
orders, quaratrtircs" rules or rcgutrations aad in pro,.
viding certaiD other rclated sglvices arc rcasoaable
and necessar5r therefore; and
(c) That the Board of Supervisors sha[ by reso-
lution, establish fees which reflect the expenses of
(5.64) I (San Mrco Cou!ry a-9)
5.&.W
5.6d040 Caunty nealth 65""r.
.'tounty Health Officet" shall be the person
appointcd by tlre San Matco County Boad of Su-
penisors purs -uant to sec'tions 451 and 454 of the
Cdifooia Hcallh and Safety Code or his duly au-
thorized rcpreseot*ive. (Prior code S 5521J; Ord.
2514,0617Jt18; tr" 3004, OD4|U)
l5 of division 13 of the Califonda Health and
Safety Cod€.
(h) Licensed Health fac ty. me term 'licensed
hedth facility" shdl iaclude hospitals as defined in
California Heahh and Safety Code, chErter one,
division tr, and 'skilled nursing facilities" as defirrcd
in California Health aod Safety Codq chaprer two,
division tr, ard authorized by title )O(tr, section
66835.
(i) Motel. The term 'rnotel- shall includc aII
dwellings classified as 'tnocls- for purposcs of part
l5 of division 13 of rhe Califomia Heahh and
Safety Code.
O Organizdcamp. Tlt trm'oqganizdcarry"
shall have tbc same rneaning as rhat defined in
section 18897 of the Califomia Health and Safety
Code.
(k) Public Swimming Area- The term '?ublic
swimming aea- shall include all'public swimming
pools" as defined ia section 24100 of the Califomia
Health and Safety Code.
Q Hot Tub. The t€rrtr "hot filb" shdl inclqde all
trbs constructed of wood, fiberglass, plasic, or
Acrylic, containing a device to circulate hot water,
designed for emrgtnce of hurnan beings and open
on a regulai basis to the public upon paynrnt of a
fee.
(m) Ra*aunnt- The term "rcstaurant" shall have
the sarnc rraaing as fta dofined ia section 27520
of the Catfornia Health and Safcty Code.
(n) Retail Food Produaion and Marketing EstaL
lishrnens- The term 'retail food p,roduaion and
markaing esablishrnent" shall have the same rrEan-
ing as ,h" &fitred in se;ctiqr 27520 of the Califor-
nia Health and Safety Code.
(o) Reuil Food Vehicle. The term 'rcUil food
vehicle" shall irclude all '"vehicles';, as defined in
section 27540 of the Catifomia Heat6 and Safety
Code.
(p) Rodent Bait Stations. The term 'rodert bait
station" shall rnean a designared location where a
specified quantity of rodenticide is placed and main-
tained uoder the direction of the County Heatth
Officer for the purpose of controlling rodents. The
t€rm shall include, but not be limit€d to, designated
(Sa lla.o G@ty +99)<s.il) 2
5.64.05{l Definitions of certah budnesses
and Mivities subjecf to inspccion
(a) Aparmt Horse. Ihe term sapartrcDt
house" shall include all dwelEngs classified as
'aparnnent hcrres" for prposcs of part 15 of divi-
. sion 13 of tbe Califomia,Ilcalth and Safcty Codq
exoept ftat fo fec prrposes only such buildmgs
witi fou or mse dwelling uits on a parcel of lard
shall bc rcqufued o pay the.listed fees. The term
-complcx" shall ,Deah apafircot builditrgs located
on continuols parcels of land omed.by ttc same.
persoa firn or coporarion.
@) Bacldlow Pievelrtion Device Tester- Thc refin
'back-flow peveotion dcvice t€stef shall rnean a
person who is certified by the Corty Health Officcr
ia writing as compercnt o tes bacldow prcveotion
devices.
(c) Bakery. The Erm:bakery- shall have the
Enhg as thrt dciEtred in sectiot 2752fi of the
Califomia llealth aod Safety Code.
(d) Chenical Toilet Agencr. The tcrm 'ch€mical
toilet ag€ncy: shall hclude all conpanies whicb
in$alt kase, rent or scrvice chemical toilets.
(e) Ccnfecriooery. The Erm 'coafectimery" sh'll
apply o plaOes or establishments used or oprated
for.the retail sale of cardy, chewing gurn, peanuts,
nuts, or similar confectionery, whethr in bullq
cannc4 wrappe4 botled, package4 or any.other
fqm.
(f) Food Salvager. The tcrm *food satv4et''
shall include atry pqs(m fi conpary segrregating
foodsotffs from rctail food premises aftir a floo{
firc or other disaster for relabeling and resale at a
discouIt
G) Hotel. The tertr "hotef' shall include all
dwellings classified as 'hotels" for pnrposes of part
arcas of rnmicipal saDitry ed storm s€wer sys-
teEs, naEral drainage qeeks, tidelads, solid waste
disposal sitei, wastewaEr treatineot plants, aDd oth€r
Iocarions dercrmircd by the llealth Officcr to rc-
quire rodcnt bairi"g.
(q) Septic Tanh Cesspool, Chemical Toilet, and
Scuage Scepage Pit Cleanhg and Puryirig Vehicte.. The tcrm 'septis.trnk; cesqroot, chemicd toilet ard
sewage seepage pit cleaning and puruping vehicle-
include.s all vehicles to which chapter 6 of division
20 oftbc Califomia lleafth and Sdety Code applies
ad which ae used for cteaning and pmping waste, maerial from septic unks, cesspools, chemilzl
toilets, and scwage seepage pits.
(r) Srmlt Warer System. The tcrm 'trnall war€r
system" strall include all "public warer systems- as' dcftrcd in secrion ,{Ol0.l. (e) .of the Califoraia
Heatth and Safety Code which have fsu.r6 rhan !@
service cooaections.
(s) Vending Machine. The t nn 'rvending ma-
chine" shall have the same meadng as ttrat defiued
in sectio 27541 ofthe Califquia llealtt and Safety
Code, but slnll not include nuchines exclusively
dispensing bottled or canned &inks, chewing gur4
candy, or otter food which is not readily perishable
if the County ltrealth Officer has detcnnined rhat
such machines do not require routine inspection for
the p,rotcaion of the public healfr.
@ Wholesalc Food Processing Establishment.
Thc t€ro \fiolesatre food processing establishrnerf'
shall have the same meauiag as rher dcfined in
seaion 28280.1. of rhe Cdifomia Heal& and Safety' Code,buther€(ashall notiacluderetail businesses
or activities elsewherc specincaty defircd in this
chaper.
(u) Goss Connection. The tcrm 'cross conncc-
tion" shall have rhar rreaaing defmed in section
7583 (e) of title XVII of th California Adrrinistra-
tive Code. To paraphrasc that definition, it is aDy
physical coonection or aEangernent between two
otherwise separate piping systems, one of which
contains potable water and the otlrcr water of un-
known or questionable safety, wherrly water may
flow from one system to the other, the direction of
5.64.050
flow depending on the pressure differential between
the two systems,
(v) Medical Wasrc. The term 'medical wa*e.
shall have the meaning defined in *aion 25W-2
of the Califomia Heal0r and Safety Code.
(w) Mobile Home Park. The term ..mobile homepa*" shatl have the rDeaniry as that defined in
section 18300 6f the California Healdr and Safety
Code. (Prior code g 5522.1; M. 2324. Ol,l}BIt5;
Ord.'2514.O6f?tft*; M. ZSA, Ojt2Sfi8; M.
2546, tlDSnS; M- n38, Uilt4t8t; Ord. 3004,
OTrUtU; Ord.3267, @r25t90r, M. 3357,lnVr:
Ord.3527, latU93)
5.64.060 Imposifion of fees
(a) Generally, atry person who conducts or in-
gages in C:busbess or aaivity as dcfiired in section
5.64.050 of this ch.prer, wtich hrsini:ss or aaivity
is within the geographical arca under thejurisdiaion
of the Couty Heatrb OfEcer, shall be liabb to pay
the Environrental H6alth inspection fec established
by odinance of the Board of Super.vison for ttrat
busincss c activity wifrin fiirty days from the datc
of billing drercfore" Said fee shatt be payable armu-
ally and shall cover a period of one yea from the
datc of paimcn! unless otherwise specified b] ihe
Couuty }lealth Officer.
@) Closing or Termin*ion of Business. The
County Health Officer nray, in the case of closing
or terminatioi of a business, refirnd not to excced
50% of the fee whca the aaivity was in busiress for
less than six (Q months of the billing year.
(c) Seasoual Birsiipsses. A scasona! ' activity
which is ir busitress for six (6) months or less ihall
be obligated o pay 50% of the fee.
(a) Reinspcction Re. A pinspeoion is any iraiv-
ity which occurs after a second inspectioo of a
facility, whe initial violations are not corEctcd
and the,third inspecti@ iS rcquir€d to coErct viola--
tions. In these cases, a rcinspection fee shall be
charged for the inspeaioa as well as subcequent
reinErection activities as required to coriect viola-
tions docurnented by rhe division.
(5.64) 3 (S.. Ma.o Cdiry +99)
s.@.w
(e) Exemfnions FromFee. The following shall be
exempt from payrnent of fces imposed by this chap
ter:
1. 'Rodent Bait Sutions- wh.erc valid" renew-
able agreerrcnts ftom pest control operatgrs and
cities, sanit4fy or saniAnion disticts. are enfsced
until,the new agpeinent is prepared and negoSatdl.
2. Any business or activiry opeded by a blind
persoa vfro has a certificarc.issrcd by the Bureau
of Vocational Rehabiliadon of the State of Catrifor-
nia
3. Any state-rcgistered or &D( exernpt person or
orgariization qperating, exclusively for a charitable
purposer. a business or activity defiDed in sec-tion
5.64.050 u&ere no person berefits ttuough the dis-
tributioo of profits or other oomp€osation- . i4. Any persons or organization which is uftolly
supported by tax revenues. :
(0_ Rearned Ch€cks. A service chargc of $25.00
wll be added to and become part of any underlying
obligation for any rehrned checlc
G) Any person rnay appeal the amount of tre
fee, in writing, to the Director of Envirorirnental
Health who shall determiDe the corrccmess of the
arrcrrnt o{ the fee assessed. (Prior code g 55t221'
M- 23A, O7lO8l75; m. 2389, @Ntl76; M.
2514, O6l2Dt78l. M.2546., llt?-8t78: Orid- 2636,
03/1 1/80; Ord- 27 38, V7 |l4l8l; M- 3OM, Ul wtt84;
M- 326i1, O9f25l9o, Ord- 3357, lI7 D2; M. 35n,
l2ll4l93; Ord- 3686, lll1495; Ord. 3849, A4/9S)
S.il.VlO Collectron of fecs
Envinonmntal health fees shall be charged annu-
ally for activities for wlich the Cormty Healtt Offi-'
cer or ofter County offioer or employee is charged
with the rcsponsibility of enforcing any stanfie,
order, quarantine, mle or regulation prescribed by
state officer or delatuent relating to the public
heal& which either requires or authorizes the C-oun-
ty Health Officer or other Corrnty officer or employ-
ee to perform specified acts.
The fee shall also be charged upon review of
plans for new constnrction, renovation or rcmodel-
ing of bakeries, confectioneries, food salvagers,
organized camps, public swimming areas, hot tubs,
resf,aurants, r€tail food prOduction and marteting
establishments and wholesale fmd processing
etablisbrnents, wells ad sepic renks, vectorconfiol
abderen! medical and solid waste, Iand use and
developmenl
Ihe following Environrne.ntal Health fees shall be
chqged for the activities listed below:
(San MacoC.@ty499)(s.@) 4
i
FOOD ESTABLISEMHITTS
C-ommissry - Carcring
Commissary
ResauranlBar 10 Scais
Restaurant/3ai 1I--5O Sears
-RestaurantlBar 51-1fl) Seats
Re.staurandBar 101-150 Seats
Restaurant/3ar 15 l-ZX) Seats
ResaurandBar Over 201 Sea6
Coucession/Comm
Tempmry Resaurant
Balccry 40fJoFc^2
Balcry >?-0/uu_ft-a2
Temporary Bakery
C-ontectiomy
Mnkct 4WOFu^2
Ivlatct 2,0G-6,000 Fr^2
Miltet 60fr)-10,000Fr^2
Ma*a >10,000 FL^2
Re,tail Sore Wlncid Food Sales
Temporary Market
Food Salv"4er
Vending Machine
Mobile Food Sales
Mobile Food Prreparation
Pushcqts And Stands
Certifid Farmers ldarket
Food Facility Plan Review - Remodel
Food Facility Plan Review
Food ServiceVllor
5 Year Tobacco Sales Permit
9tq9L
u2[3tD8
ulurg-
ur3l/9t)
VUUT
utf,suw
5.@.WO
On/After
uwr
$250.00
589.00
n9.w
46,L0n.
$236.00
536.00
254.W
42t.OO
50r.00
590.00
680.00
76r..W
536.00
19r.00
4t2.N
574-W
19r.00
191.00
217.fi
394.00
670.00
76t.N
19r.00
191.00
689.00
13.00
191.00
431.00
287.W
191.00
96.00
670.00
81.00
25.W
$24-W
5s3.00
262.N
4y.w
517.00
609.00
?ALffi
791.00
553;00
'197.00
425.W
592.W- 197.00
197.00
224.@
4ri7.@; 691.00
791.00
197.@
197.00
711.00
13.00
197.00
445.00
296.N
r97.00
99.00
691.00
84.00
25.00
$252.00
571.00
nofr
448.00
534.00'
628.00
7U-W
8r6-00
571.00
2A3,.N
439.00
5n-00
2m-m
203.00
231.00
4?-O:00
7t3.W
816.00
201-0p
203-W
7y-fi
13.00
2n3.W
459.00
305.00
203.W
r0e00
7I3.00
86.00
25.00
551-00'
649.00,'
747.fi
u2.w
589.00
209'.@
,453.00..
631.00
209.W
2W.W
238.m
433.00 .
736.00
842.00
20p-ffi
2W.W
757.W
13.00
474:W
315.00
ry.00
105.00
736.W
89.00
25.W
(5.64) s (Sar McoComy+99)
5.g.wo
HOU-SING PROGRAM
Apartment House
Adj Sarc Owner
Hotcl q Motel25 rooms or less
Ilotel or Moel25 rooms or rrore
Bed and Brcakfast
Orgauzld Camp
Labor Carp Annual:krmit*
Inbor Camp Per Unit*
Mobile Home Pa* Annual Permit*
Mobile Horrc h* Inspection Fee*
Mobile Horre Pa*.Fer Unit+
Statc&9 2- 19 SpacgS+
State Fec 20 - 49 Spaces*
State Fec 50 - 99 Spaces*
Statc Fee 100 - 249 Spaces*
Statc Fee 250 - 499 Spaces*
Statq Fee 500 or More Spaces*
Housing/Jail Senices/tlr
TTIIW
x2But 9
UUOT
PNUN
)
$ 56.00
. 4-00
28r.00'
, 479.ffi
249.&
345.00
35.00
r200
25-g.r.
4-00
2.ffi
40-00
75.m
r75.00
400.00
800.00
1,600.00
8l-00
$ 58:00
4.13
290.00
494.00
257-W
3s6.00
35.00
12.00
xi.@
4.00
2.0
40.00. 75.00
175.00
400.00
8m.00
,1,600.00
84.00
$ 60.00
426
299.W
510.00.
265.ffi
367.00.
35.00
12.00
25.00,
4.00
2.fi
40-00
75.00
175.m
4{n.00
809.00
1,600.00
86.00
$62.00
4.40
309.00
526.00
273.N
379.00
35.m
12t00,
25.00
4.00
2.N
40.00
,75.00,
u5.00
400.00
800.00
1,600.00
89.00
* Fixed fee established through State regulation, zubject to charrge as State regularions are amended.
(Sao lv|&o Cotrty,l-99)(5.64) 6
etw
98t"n8
On/After
lfltot
\trATER At{D WASIE
IMatcr Sampling Fee - POTW
Higt Use Pools
Ifigh Use: Each Add PooUSpa
First, PooUHot Tubs/Spas
Inac{ive Pool
AddUPool/Spa/T[b
Plaa Rev/ODe Pooltsp
Plan Rev/Addl Pooltspa
Pool Remodel lvlajor
Pool,Ramodel Major - Additional
Poot Remodel Minor
Pool :-Remodet Mnor.: Additional
Pool Service.{Ilour
Grtification Fee @acJdlow Tester)
Amual Tags for Devices
Certificadon Exam . i.
Cross Connection ServiceV[Iour
Ctemical Toilet Ageocy
Septic Tank hmper :
Chemical Toilet Insallation
Chemical Toilet Each
Cornmuoity Warer System
Q*A Con)+
Commmity'IVater System
(25-99 Con)*
Community'Warcr System
(lOGl'Csa)*
Noncormrulity Systela+ .
State Srnall'Warcr Sysem
I-ocd SrDall Water System
Small V/ater Systems Services/Ilr
$287.00
4p;9.U
2?5.@
n5.@
81.00
I13:00
6t2-w
306.00
4n.N
210.00
rf2.00
56-00
81.00
72.W
5-00
175.(n
81.00
y2.ffi
t71.00
144,00
41.00
$2%.00
4tr,3;.W
232.fi
232.fi
,g4.00
1r7.00
632.N
316.00
433.00
717.W
116.00
s8.00
84.00
74.0
,5.00
18r.00
84.00
3s3.00
176.00
149.00
42.N
$305.00
478.N
239.N
'239.N
87I)0'
tzt-0f.
652.00
326.m
47-W
2V+.N
,,n.w
, ().00
86.00
76.W
s.00
187.00
86.00,,
3&.W
r82.00
154.00
43.O0
$315.00
493.ffi
u7.w
2/+7-W
90.m
125.00
673-ffi
33600
46I.00'
231.N.:IALffi
62,00.
99.00
78.00
5.00
I93,fi) :
89.00'
376:W
188:00
.159,00
4.W
9l@v
,it/3.ltgs
uury
t?,B1lgg
Lr,/lO{,-^
\2BU$
250.00
400.00
s00.00
350.00
33s.00
149-00
86.00
5.&.A7A
On/After
ulmt
250.00
4{)0.00
s00.00
35000
346.00
154-00
89-00
250.00
400.00
500.00
350.00
315.00
140.00
81.00
250.00
400.00
s00.00
3s0.00
325-00
t4/.-w
84-00
* Fixed fee established through State regulation, nrbject to change as state rcgulations rirc amended.
(s.@)7 (Saa M:tco Conoty +99)
5.A.WO
I,AND USE PROGRAM
Se,ptic Sysem Site Investigation
Septic Repair
Septic Installationd-500 FT^2
SeBtic Insallation<3j00 Ff^2
Septic Insallatiop3j00 FT^2
Se.uage Sysem ChargefiIour
Setric Sys Perc Test
Wcll Drilliry Permit
WelI Drining Fcrmit (Sady &ea)
neccf,tinc*ion ftelSoil Perc Tester
Rcsubmital Fec
Varimce Re
Alternative Sysems
Prressre Dosed Sysems
Wet Weaft€r Testing
Pe@it Extension (50%)
Permit Appeal
lnspation Cancellation
Well Abadonrnent
Certif fq Dornestic Use
I.ad Use Services/llour
Unsewerpd frfaj Iand DivrPar
Sewered Maj Led DivrPar
Unsevcred Min I.rnd Div/Par
SewErEd Min Lmd Div/Pr
OtherLand Usc Senices
Certificate of Coryliance
Exotic Animal Permit
unsr9r
t2r3tfrrg
1fit99-
DT3I,TD
uuofu-^
tzBuw
On/After
TI,^/ro.L
$270.00
429.fi
4y.2.W
748.00
1,(D9.00
8r.00
, 492.W
369.00
410.00
xt7.N- 2s.00
, 280-00
187.m
4,58-00
458.00
468-OO
2t5-W
l/rc.00
93.00
187-00
374.W
81.00
4y2.OO
369.00
492.W
369.00
148.00
138.00
162-ffi
$n9.u
443.N
508.00
, 772.00
LO62.00
84.00
508.00
'38r-00
.423.W
9E8.00
26.N
289.00
193.00
483.m
483.00
483.00
'r22.N
t4.N
96.00
193.00
386.00
j'84.00
s08.00
38r.OO
s08.00
381.00
153.00
142.@
167.00
$288.00
457.W
524.00
797,@
1,096.00
86.00
5%l;OO
393.00
437.W
1,020.00
27.@
298.00
199:00
498-00
498.00
498.m'
229.OO
149.00
99.00
199.00
398.00
86.00
5?4.W
393.00
5y+.ffi
393-00
158.00
147.W
t72.W
g297-00
472.N
541.00'
823.00
1,131.00,
89.O0
54r.00
{06.00
451.00
L053:00.
28.fi).
36.00
2O5:(X)'
5r4.00
514.00
5r4In
236.ffi
154:00
r02.00
205.00.
4Ilj00
89.00
541:00 .
,406.(X).
541.00 ,
406.00
163.00
I52.00
178.00
i
(S- MacoComy+9)(5.64) 8
ulty)-
t:U3r1lr9
tnfrl,_.
t?J3uN
OD/After
utm
9t/u98_
xu31fir8
VEMOR/IVTEDICAJ./ISOLID WASTE
Solid Wasre Permit Modification $I,0Z6.00
Solid Waste ServiceVllour 81.00
klxlfill Inspection Fee (COLMA) IZ75.OO
l--4 Bait Station Insp. 123
5-8 Bait Station Insp. 2.46
9-12 B.an Station Insp. 3.69
Medical 'IVaste }lauler 128.00
Medicat Waste 1-99 Lbllrrlo 297.@
frg Qty W0n-Sitc Trearment 430.m
Medical WastD200 Lb/Mo 430-00
Health Facifity-Infecr Waste 251.00
5.64.080 nartncrstip.
Ifa fee is paid under this chapter by a partrership
whic.h sukcquently is changed by the addition or
rcduaioo ofparuers, qedit for the payment_of said
fee pay be giien o the oew partnership upon appli-
cation for stch credit accompanied by pafDeot of
a t'andcr fee of $25.00 (Twenty-Fivc Dotlas) ro rhe
Environmental Health Division of the San Maeo
Cormty Dcparmt of IIeaIlfi Services. (prior code
$ 5522"5; Orrd- 251 4, 06f?1178; M- 3267, @I2SDO)
5.64-(D0 Generaldednitiou"
The tcrm 'alteration or use of real prcpcrty,' as
usd h ttis cbaper sh.[ EEan aoy change in the
use of rcal property or continuation of the exisrirrg
use of rcal prroperty wherc gclr change in, or con-
tiruarim of, tb€ use requires specific writtea ap
proval. whcfier in tie form of a permit or other-
wise, by the San Marco County Planning Divisioru
Zoning Hearhg Officer, r Office of Environnrmal
Health- Tbe term shall include, but not be limited to,
rmjor land divisions, minor land divisions, lot line
adjusEnents, zoning changes, activities
variances or use permits, timber hznvesting, mainte-
nance of kenneis and stabteq grading, and moving
of hiildings. (Prior code S 5523.I; M. Z3A,
O7D8t75; M- 2514, {6DI/78)
5.6t f00 Major land diviiion .
The term'major land division" includes any land
division corqtised of five (5) or morc parccls.
(Prior code 5 55232; @ 2324, fi,08r5; ffi.
2389, @ lUl 17 6; M- 2514, OErZOn!)
5.6t 110 Minor lmd dividon
fie tenn 'hinor land division. includes any tand
division under five (5) parcels. (Prior code 5 55233;
N.23U,UINB|TS; Ord- 2514 05DOr78)
S.U.I:N Irt liD€ adjttsheuts.
The term 'lot line adjustrrnt- rneans any mimr
boundary change betrrecn c@tigudts Ftccls of
ploperty agrccd upon by 6e owneis thereof. @ior
code 9 5523.4; M- 23U, Alt0IEns; M. ?514,
6mn8)
5.64.80 Imposftion Of fees.
Any person who mates an alteration orr use of
rcal property as defined in seaioa 5-64.090 shall be
liable to pay the fees thrit are esrablished by rcsolu-
tion of the Board of Supewisors. Said fec shall be
$1,1r0.00
84.00
1,316.00
1.27
254
3.81
t32.N
296-0o
444-O0
444.0A
259.00
$1,r46.00
86.00
1,358-OO. l3t
2.62
3-93
135,00
305.00
458-O0
458.00
?,r,Tfi
$r,183.00
89.00
t,,ro1.0o
135
2.70
4.M
t40.00
315.00
473.@
473.N
n6-m
@iocode $ 55223;d-2514,6t2Ot78;M-25?A,UtDSn8; ffi 2546, ttDBtTB;N,.Xt%,Oyttt8|l:Gd-zBl,M/02lBl;N"/738,urfi48r;M.?it99, r0o582; Ond.3{xx, qianu:or*zzal,wtxmt
Ord- 3357, lll&2;@"36%,llll4l95; fr- 3349,8i/zrl9& Orrcl 3852, Iry698)
<s.@) 9 (sa r4rco C6'tr a49)
5-@.gto
5.64.130
payable within thirty days said person files for such
alteration oruse. Said fee shatl be in addition to any
permit or other fee rcquired under this code or under
any surErte, rule, or regulation for nrch alteration or
use. (Priorcode g 55235; M-2324,O7D8f15:Ord.
2514,6D0n8; Ord. W, W|AUU)
5.&.1fi Applir:ation
Businesses and activities which requife either
lpecial non-routine inspections, seasonal snneil-
Iance, or-particularserviaes to enforce sate surtrtes,
or&rg, qgarantines, ruIes, or regulations relating to
pnblic hcatth shall be liable forfield inspecrion fecs.
Such businesses and activities shall include, but not
be Umited to, those sot out in scctisr 5.64.O50. They
shall also inclnda bmootbelimiEd to,.ocea beach
sanitation, application of sevrage sludge to agricul-
arral lan4 and intensive inspection of special evelrts
(Prior code g 55?-4.1; M.2324,07t08fi5- M.
2514,06ir2ong)
5.64.150 Fee amount
An horly fee shall be chargpd for services ren-
dered pursuant to section 5 -il.l0.This fec shall be
catled'Special Services FerHours- and tbe amount
of said fee shall be listcd in secrions 5.64O70 and,
5.120.040. (Prior code I 55Vt2; Ord. .2514,
WnOng; M,. 2738, g7 ll4lQ 1 ; M, n gg, tOtOSlSZ;
Orid. 3004, A7D.4184: M" 3267, @t25190; M.
3357,\nm)
5.64.160 Pcnalty for late paymenl
If any fee required by this c[raptcr, with the ex-
cepion of the filing fee set out in secrions 5.64-@0
througt 5-&-130, has not been paid withiD 3O days
from the due date, therc shall be imposed a penalty
equal to twenry-five percent (?S%) of the said fee.
Failure to pay any fec pqufuEd by this chElter with-
in 90 days &om the due dare Srall result in annual
intercst charge of 18% on any oqtstanding balane
due. Where the County Healft Officer daermines
that such delinErency hasbeen caused by excusabb
neglect on the part of ihe person biled or by mis-
take on dre part of the Division, the penalties may
be waived. (Prior code g 5525.1: Ord- 2514,
Off20/78; M 2636, O3tI l/80; M, 2738, Ut fi 4tgl;
Ord- 3308, A3lOJgl;Ord. 3352, tfiED:ffi. 3696,
lltt491; Ord. 3849, 8/4198)
(Saa Maeo Goonty +99)(5.64) 10
Sections:
5.6&010
5.6&020
5.68.03{t
5.68.040
Definifions.
Pcrmit to operale"
A.pplication for pemit.
Ismance, susp€nsion ard
Devocatioh of lrermit
5.58.010 Definitions.
(a) Thc term'food estabfishmeot" iDcludes all
'rEstaullaotsl as defined in sectio ?35D, of fu
Califomia Health aod Safety Code, aIt 'itiaerint
rrstmrmts" 8s dcfired ia section 28523 of the Cali-
fqtria llealth aDd S'afety C,o&; a[ nehichs- as
defined in section 5Z of thc Califomia llealth and
Safety Code; all 'vending machines" as defined in
sectibn 28525 of th California Heali and Safery
Codc; all 'rctail food prodrction and marketing
c*ablishments" as defined by secti,on 288(D of the
CElifonia Heath and S8n*y ilde; and all .baker-
ies" as defined by section 28190 of the Califomia
Ilealth aad Safety Code.
O) 'Ilealft Officef mans the Eirector of Itrealth
Scnrices of San M*eo County, or his & y autto-
rized represenutive.
(c) The term 'rcSauant1 shall have 6e same
nicaning as rft" ablliDed in section 28522 of fu,
Cstifdda lleaftt and Safety Code.
(d) The term'retail food vehicle" inchdes all
'tehicles" as defined in section 2852 of the CaIi-
fomia lleallt aDd Safety Code and alt .itinerant
restaurants" as defited in section 28523 of the Cali-
fonia Health atrd Safery Cod,e.
(e) The tenn 'vending rnachine" has the same
rcaoiDg as ttd &fioed in section 2E525 of tte
CalifGnia Heath and Safety Code. (prior code !
55,0.1; Onrt lA99,t2ll5l55; Ord. 141, OtnAST.
M- 23U, O7{JEr/5; Ort 3308,03/l2Dl; catchline
editorially cr€ate4 6D4)
5.68.010
sffJrl0 Petmit to operare.
It shall be uatawftl for aoy person to opel, opcr-
ate' or eng?ge in the business of operating either (a)
a retail food production and rrarteting esrablishment
in geographic areas in which tte Coudty l{eal6
Officer is rcspomsfole for enforc,ing ststo stamtesr
orders, $ratincs, n es or rcgul*ios rcldirg to
.pnblic health;.or(b) arestaurant,.Etail food.vehLle,
vending machine fi bakery in ufitoorpot"ated dcas
of tte C.ounty, unle,ss thar pelson h<ilds a valid
pelmit ismed by the County DeparEnent of Hcalth
Services. @iorcode g 55r+0.2; Orrd- l@9,A2t$t15:
M-232A,Ar08n5i q[d.330s, Ogn?Jgt) ' ..
5.6&030 Application for pernit
(a) Any per.son &siring to opcn a food establish-
ui:nt shall apply in wdting for a permit ro tb.D}i?-
par@Dt of ltrcalth services. He may not eognge in
business uutit nrs- application has been acccptcd and
a permit issued.
@) Any petson who is engaged in lhe operation
of a food establishment at the tiEe rlris chapfier
becomes effective rhalt apply for a permit in unitingo the Department'of Health Services wirtin siity
(6O) days following rhe clfectivc dare of this chap
ter. The Deparmcat of ttrealtt Services sha[ grant
u deny each applicaio.n within one hundrrcd twenty
(12O) days after receipt of the application. Thercd-
ter, it shalt be rmlawfirl for any person to contioue
to op€rate such food establishm€ot without having
a permit as herein provided. (PIio( code $ 5!().3:
Ord. 10!D, 021t5t55; OrA t9OZ, 0dl8/68; Ord.
2324,t1N{75; Oftt 3308, O3/t2tgt)
5.68,040 Issnance, suspension and
revocation of pemit.
(a) If, after investigation, it is determined thar tlre
food e.sablishrent complies with the requircrents
of srde laws and with the rcqufuements of this chae
ter, s permit shall be issued by the Departrent of
Health Services.
O) A permit may be revoked or suspended by
the County Health Officer where he has determined
that a violition of state law or a provision of rhis
chaptrr exists, where he has given written ndice to
(5.68) I
Chapier 5.68
FOOD ES|IABT.ISEMENTS
I5.68.O10
the permiuee of said violation, and where said per-
miuee has failed or neglected with a reasonable time
after strch notice to make the necessqry corrections
calld for thcrein.
(c) Any permittee u&o feels aggrieved by an ac-
tim of rurycnsio or revocation of a perymit by fu
County Health Officer is entitted to ahearing before
the:GounU-llcaing Officer and tte Couoty llealtt
Officer shall inform tbe permitee of this rigtt
Upon reeip of,a,rcquest for a hearing, tbe County
Hearing Officer shall set the mamer for hearing at
tte earlit:l* Fcticable date, but in no event later
than foutcen (14) days from the effective dats of
suspe,nsion q rcvocation. At said hearing, &e Coun-
ty H€adng Officer shallconsider the report of tte
Health Offier and any cvidcnce presened by thc
permiree allegodty aggrieved. The County Heafing
Officer may rejecq affirm, or modi$ the Ilealth
Officir's &ision, uthich action shall befinal
(d) AU permis issu€d under the provisions of
this chryter mst be posted cin the premises of tb
business in a conspicuors place.
(e) Permif arenot transferable from orp busiress
or location to another, orfrom one person to ano&-
er. (Priorcode $ 5540.4;Ord. l(89, Cf/l5l51'M.
1201, 01/08t57; ffi. 23!1, VIlOSllS; ffi- 3308'
03n2t9t)
)
i
(5.68) 2
)
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC]L
February 5,2OO2
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
2t20t02
5f
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
sUBJECT: ADOPT ORDTNANCE AMENDING TTTLE 13 TO CLAR
REGULATIONS WITH REGARD TO STREET AND PUBLIC OFF -STREET PARKING
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing to:
1. Adopt proposed ordinance.
2. Direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROUND: Section 13 of the Burlingame Municipal Code covers driving rules within the city. In
reviewing this section with the Police Departrnent and the City Attorney, the following changes are
recommended which will better regulate vehicle parking and operation.
13.16.010 - This section authorizes the placement of signage to control vehicle turns on city streets.
The language is modified to allow the City Engineer to also place signage controlling turns from
private driveways onto city streets. Existing signage placed as a result of development conditions as
well as future signage placed by the City Engineer will be enforceable by the Police.
13.32.170 - This section defines excessive length of vehicles in public parking lots and diagonal
street parking spaces. The language has been modified to clearly apply to all parking facilities and
street spaces.
13.36.045 - This section allows diagonal parking on city streets within a marked or signed space.
The language is modified to apply to all angle parking, including perpendicular parking, as well as
list the city street segments which have existing angle parking.
13.36.046 - This section allows parking within a marked space on city streets and public parking
lots. The language is modified to not allow parking within a marked space if the vehicle blocks or
impedes the traveled way.
13.36.047 - This section allows the City Engineer to place vehicle height resrriction signage in
parking zones on city streets. The language is modified to also include public parking facilities.
13.36.049 - This section regulates the movement of vehicles within a time limitation in public
parking facilities. The modified language allows the Police to make observations and certain
presumptions to determine compliance.
13.36.050 - This section regulates parking in city parking facilities. The language is modified to
clearly include regulating the operation of vehicles within city parking facilities by appropriate
signage.
13.38.020 - This section allows the City Engineer to place red, yellow, white, green and blue curb
markings to regulate parking and stopping. The language is modified to also allow the City Engineer
to place signage to regulate parking and stopping.
These changes have no effect on the parking time limits.
a
a
a
a
o
a
o
EXHIBIT: Ordinance
AND AFFIRM PARKING
Page 2
BUDGET IMPACT: Any effects are covered in normal department operations.
C. Erbacher, P.E.
Assistant Public Works Director
Tel. 650-558-7230
c:City Clerk, Police Department
S:\A Public Works Directory\Saff Reports\Parking Salls Ordinance 2.wpd
\
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
T3
t4
15
r6
t7
l8
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINAI\CE No.
ORDINAIICE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING TITLE 13 TO CLARII|T/ AND AFFIRM PARKING REGULATIONS
WITH REGARD TO STREET AND PUBLIC OFF.STREET PARKING
The CITY COTINCIL of the CITY OF BIIRLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows
Section 1 . Making parking in on-street and off-street facilities as efficient and pleasant
as possible is a key element to sustaining the vitality of the shopping districts of the City.
Clarification of some of the regulations in title l3 of the Municipal Code would assist in parking
enforcement and ensuring security and upkeep ofthe parking facilities. This ordinance also affirms
the existing angle parking spaces on streets in the City.
Section 2. Section 13.16.010 is amended to read as follows:
13.16.010 Authority to restrict turning movements.
The city engineer is authorized to determine intersections, driveways, and other entrances
to streets at which drivers of vehicles shall not make a right, left or U-turn, and shall cause to be
placed proper signs at such intersections, driveways, or other entrances. The making of such tums
may be prohibited between certain hours of any day and permitted at other hours, in which event
the same shall be plainly indicated on the signs, or the signs may be removed during the hours
when such turns are permitted.
Section 3. Section 13.32.170 is amended to read as follows:
13.32.170 Vehicles of excessive length.
No vehicle, including a truck, tractor, trailer, camping vehicle or combination thereof that
exceeds twenty (20) feet in overall length shall be parked at any time upon a public municipal
parking facility or in an angle street parking space. This prohibition shall not apply to trucks or
delivery vehicles which are stopped or parked temporarily for loading or unloading merchandise
and materials.
1
Section 4. Section 13.36.045 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.045 AngleParking.
(a) The following streets are designated as streets on which the city engineer may place
angle parking:
(1) Burlingame Avenue between California Drive and El Camino Real;
(2) California Drive between Burlingame Avenue and Highland Avenue;
(3) Chapin Avenue between Primrose Road and El Camino Real;
(4) East Lane between North Lane and Burlingame Avenue
(5) The 1800 block of the Frontage Road to El Camino Real;
(6) Howard Avenue from Highland Avenue to Primrose Road;
(7) Magnolia Avenue from Trousdale Drive to Murchison Avenue; and
(8) Oak Grove Avenue from North Carolan Avenue to Linden Avenue.
(b) On any of the streets or portions of streets established as angle parking zones, when
signs or pavement markings are in place indicating such diagonal parking, it shall be unlawful for
the operator of any vehicle to park such vehicle except:
( 1) At the angle to the curb or wheel stop indicated by signs or pavement markings allotting
space to parked vehicles and entirely within the limits of such allotted space;
(2) With the front wheel nearest the curb or wheel stop within six (6) inches of the curb or
wheel stop.
(c) The provisions of subsection (b)(2) shall not applywhen a vehicle is actually engaged
in the process of loading or unloading freight.
(d) Angle parking includes both diagonal and perpendicular parking.
Section 5. Section 13.36.046 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.046 Parking space markings.
(a) Whenever parking space markings are placed on a street or parking lot, subject to other
and more restrictive limitations, no vehicle shall be stopped, left standing or parked:
(1) So as to impede or block the flow of traffic on the traveled way; nor
2
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
I7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(2) Other than entirely within a single space as defined by the parking space markings.
(b) Whenever parking space markings are placed on a street or parking lot, no more than
one vehicle may be parked within a single space.
Section 6. Section 13.36.047 is amended to provide as follows:
13.36.047 Limited height parking zones.
(a) Limited height parking zones, not in excess of one hundred feet of any intersection, or
on certain streets or highways or portions thereof, may be established by the city engineer. Limited
height parking zones may also be established by the city engineer for or any portion within any city
o ff- street parking facility.
(b) It is unlawful for any vehicle, more than six feet in height to park in an area designated
as a limited height parking zone.
(c) The city engineer shall provide for the placement of signs marking such parking zones.
Section 7. Section 13.36.049 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.049 Moving vehicles in municipal parking facilities.
It is unlawful for any person to move a vehicle within a city parking facility so that it
remains therein for aperiod oftime in violation of Section 13.36.050. Anyvehicle observed at two
or more parking spaces in the parking facilitywithin such aperiod oftime and having an observed
odometer change of less than one-tenth miles shall be presumed to have remained within such lot;
a vehicle observed at two or more parking spaces in the parking facility within such a period of
time and with the odometer obscured from view from without the vehicle shall be rebuttably
presumed to have remained stationary.
Section 8. Section 13.36.050 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.050 Municipalparkingfacilities.
(a) It is unlawful for any person to park any vehicle on any property owned, possessed or
maintained by the city as a municipal parking facility in violation of time limitations or any other
aJ
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
regulations which may be fixed or determined by resolution or ordinance of the city council
(b) It is unlawful for any person to park or operate any vehicle on any property owned,
possessed or maintained by the city as a municipal parking facility in violation of any regulations
which may be fixed or determined pursuant to this title.
(c) No such regulation shall be enforceable prior to installation of appropriate signs giving
notice of the provisions of the regulation.
Section 9. Section 13.36.052 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.052 Application of other chapters to municipal parking facilities.
All provisions of this title, including but not limited to those regarding parking meters,
stopping, standing, and parking vehicles, insofar as they are applicable, shall apply to public off-
street parking facilities owned or operated by the city.
Section 10. Section 13.38.020 is amended to read as follows:
13.38.020 Signage and curb and pavement markings to indicate stopping and parking
regulations
(a) The city engineer is authorized, subject to the provisions and limitations of this title,
to place, and when required herein shall place, the following curb markings to indicate parking or
standing regulations, and such curb markings shall have the meanings as herein set forth:
(1) "Red" shall mean no stopping, standing or parking at any time except as permitted by
the Vehicle Code or this title, and except that a bus may stop in a red zone marked or signed as a
bus stop.
(2) "Yellow" shall mean no stopping, standing or parking at any time between eight a.m.
and six p.m. of any day except Sundays and holidays for any puryose other than the loading or
unloading of passengers or freight. The city engineer may apply these restrictions for longer hours
or on Sundays and holidays, or both, for particular yellow zones, and such additional restrictions
shall be effective when signs are posted giving notice of the restrictions.
(3 ) "White" shall mean no stopping, standing or parking for any purpose other than loading
4
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
l5
T6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
or unloading or passengers, or for the purpose of depositing mail in an adjacent mail box, which
shall not exceed three minutes, and such restrictions shall apply between eight a.m. and six p.m.
of any day except Sundays and holidays and except that when such zone is in front of a hotel,
theater or public building, or in front of a mailbox, the restrictions shall apply at all times.
(4) "Green" shall mean no standing or parking for longer than thirry minutes, unless some
other period of time is indicated, between eight a.m. and six p.m. on any day except Sundays and
holidays. The city engineer may apply these restrictions for longer hours or on Sundays and
holidays, orboth, forparticular greenzones, and suchadditionalrestrictions shallbe effectivewhen
signs are posted giving notice of the restrictions.
(5) "Blue" shall mean no stopping, standing or parking for any purpose by any vehicle
except those displaytng a distinguishing plate or placard issued to disabled persons or disabled
veterans.
(b) The city engineer is authorized to mark the pavement or to post signs, or both, in
addition to or in place of such curb markings as the city engineer may determine and as provided
by state law and regulations.
(c) The city engineer is authorizedto establish zones combining any of the above markings
and signage for such hours and days as may be determined.
Section 1 1. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certif,z that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day
offgbryafy,2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_
-
day
5
of 2002, by the following vote:
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS:
C :\FILES\ORDINANC\parkingspaces.pwd.wpd
City Clerk
6
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
7a
2t20t2002
TO:Honorable Mavor and rncil SUBMITTED
BY
DATE : Februarv 13-2002 APPRO
BY
FROM Larrv E. Anderson. Citv ttornev
INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO LIMIT THE NOISE LEVEL AND FURTHER LIMIT THE
HOURS OF OPERATION OF LEAFBLOWERS
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Introduce ordinance to strengthen regulation of leafblowers in the City by:
1. Request the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
2. Waive further reading of the proposed ordinance.
3. Introduce the proposed ordinance.
4. Direct the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before its
proposed adoption.
DISCUSSION:
At the September 17,2001, Council meeting, the Council discussed various noise issues in the City. The
Council directed staff to prepare proposals regarding construction hours, truck deliveries, and leafblowers.
Since that time, the Council has amended the hours for construction activity, and staff is working on a report on
a further revision in the near future. The Council has also limited the hours of loading and unloading activities
that cause a noise disturbance in a residential district.
With regard to leafblowers, staff contacted various cities and the Bay Area Gardeners' Association (BAGA) to
better understand the issues involved. The most comprehensive effort has been made by the City of Palo Alto.
For the past 2 years, that city has gradually implemented restrictions on the noise level of leafblowers, the hours
of operation, and the training of commercial operators. These restrictions apply throughout the city. BAGA,
which represents a number of gardening contractors, reports that these restrictions have been well-accepted, and
that almost all gardeners have been able to work within their parameters.
We have checked manufacturer's specifications and found that there are a variety of blowers available that meet
the 65 dBA standard. Some are electric and some are gas-powered. Because this is a first step, staff is not
recommending that the restrictions be extended to the commercial districts at this time; most complaints have
come from the residential neighborhoods.
Mayor and Council
Re: Introduction of Oridnance Restricting Operation of Leaf Blowers in Residential Districts
February 8,2002
Page2
The standards suggested in the proposed ordinance would be:
A. Effective May l,2002,hours on Monday through Saturday would be limited to 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
B. Effective May 1,2002, hours on Sunday and holidays would be limited to 12 noon to 4 p.m.
C. Effective July 1,2002,1eaf blowers would have to meet a 65 dBA standard by manufacturer's
specification and have all mufflers and extension tubes attached.
Other cities do not allow the use of leaf blowers on Sundays and holidays; that may be too restrictive for
homeowners when the decibel standards are in place. Burlingame currently allows use by owners or residents
on Sundays and holidays, but staff does not believe that is an enforceable standards that the Police Department
could effectively apply.
Palo Alto has an extensive program for certification of commercial operators of leaf blowers. The City's Police
Department has worked with the Bay Area Gardeners Association to develop a training program that results in a
certificate that operators in Palo Alto are required to carry when operating a leaf blower; this seems like an
excellent way of communicating restrictions and encouraging compliance. However, with Burlingame's need to
limit spending, it is unlikely that the Burlingame Police Department could spare either time or personnel to
manage such a program. Therefore, it is recommended that such a program be held in abeyance unless a
significant need is demonstrated.
Nevertheless, as in Palo Alto and Menlo Park, enforcement of the leafblowers restrictions will depend entirely
on the Police Department, and training and implementation will be needed.
The proposed ordinance provides a baseline for discussion and direction. Following any changes the Council
would like to apply, the ordinance can be brought back to the Council for public hearing and fuither discussion.
Attachment
Proposed Ordinance
Summary Table of Ordinances
Distribution
Chief of Police
City Planner
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
l3
t4
15
r6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE No.-
ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10.40 TO LIMIT THE USE OF
LEAFBLOWERS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
The CITY COTINCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Section 10.40.037 has governed the operation of leafblowers in the city for
the past seven years. The city has received requests from citizens seeking a shortening of the hours
of operation of leafblowers and controls on the decibel levels of the leafblowers. The City of Palo
Alto has done extensive work on this issue and in cooperation with residents and business owners,
Palo Alto has developed standards that have worked well in that city. This ordinance is modeled
after the Palo Alto standards.
Section 2. A new section 10.04.005 is added as follows:
10.04.005 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms are defined as follows:
(a) "Emergency" mean an essential activity necessary to restore, preserve, protect or save
lives or property from imminent danger of loss or harm or to restore essential services.
(b) "Holiday" means those days set forth in section 13.04.100 of this code.
(c) "Local ambient" means the lowest sound level repeating itself during a fifteen-minute
period as measured with a precision sound level meter, using slow response and "A" weighting.
The minimum sound level shall be determined with the noise source at issue silent, and in the same
location as the measurement of the noise level of the source or sources at issue. If a significant
portion of the local ambient is produced by one or more individual identifiable sources which
would otherwise be operating continuously during the fifteen-minute measurement period and
contributing significantly to the ambient sound level, determination of the local ambient shall be
accomplished with these separate identifiable noise sources silent.
(d) "Leaf blower" means any portable machine used to blow leaves, dirt and other debris
off sidewalks, driveways, lawns or other surfaces.
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
l3
t4
15
l6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(e) "Noise level" means the maximum continuous sound level or repetitive peak sound
level, produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a precision sound level meter.
In order to measure a noise level, the controls ofthe precision sound level meter should be arranged
to the setting appropriate to the type of noise being measured.
(f) "Precision sound level meter" means a device for measuring sound level in decibel units
within the performance specifications in the American National Standards Institute Standard S 1 .4,
"Specification for Sound Level Meters."
(g) "Residential district" means a district that is zoned R-1, R-2, R-3, or R-4 pursuant to
title25, but does not include a district that is zoned C-R.
(h) "Sound level," expressed in decibels (dB), means a logarithmic indication of the ratio
between the acoustic energy present at a given location and the lowest amount of acoustic energy
audible to sensitive human ears and weighted by frequency to account for characteristics of human
hearing, as given in the American National Standards Institute Standard S1.1, "Acoustic
Terminology," paragraph2.9,or successorreference. All references to dB inthis chapterutilizethe
A-level weighting scale, abbreviated dBA, measured as set forth in this section.
Section 3. Section 10.40.037 is amended to read as follows:
10.40.037 Poweredequipment.
(l) No person shall operate any lawnmower, lawn edger, riding tractor or any other
mechanical or electrical machinery, equipment or device which creates a loud, raucous or impulsive
sound, within any residential zone district otherthan except between the hours of eight 8 a.m. and
s€irren I p.m. on Monday through Saturday, or ten 10 a.m. and six 6 p.m. on Sundays and holidays.
(2) Sweeping of city parking lots or city streets and emergency work or repairs by public
I
2
1J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
13
t4
15
t6
T7
18
t9
20
2l
22
Z3
24
25
26
27
28
agencies or utilities shall be exempt from these regulations.
Section 4. A new section 10.04.038 is added as follows:
10.04.038 Leaf blowers.
(a) On and after July 1, 2002,only leaf blowers that produce a noise level of sixty-five (65)
dBA or less shall be allowed to be operated in residential districts in the city.
(b) On and after May 1, 2002,1eaf blowers shall only be operated during the following
hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Mondaythrough Saturday, and 12 noon to 4p.^.,on Sundays and holidays.
(c) In a residential district, no person shall operate any leaf blower which does not bear an
affixed manufacturer's label indicatingthe model number ofthe leafblowerand designating anoise
level not in excess of sixty-five (65) dBA when measured from a distance of fifty (50) feet utilizing
American National Standard Institute methodology. Any leaf blower that bears such a
manufacturer's label shall be presumed to comply with any noise level limit of this chapter
provided that it is operated with all mufflers and full extension tubes supplied by the manufacturer
for that leaf blower. In a residential district, no person shall operate any leaf blower without
attachment of all mufflers and full extension tubes supplied by the manufacturer for that leaf
blower.
Section 5. Subsection 10.40.039(d) is deleted
Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day
of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_ day of 2002, by the following vote:
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
I2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
19
20
2l
22
Z3
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COTINCILMEMBERS:
C :\FILES\ORDNANC\leafblowers. cdf.wpd
City Clerk
CURRENT
BURLINGAME
PROPOSED
BURLINGAME
HILLSBOROUGH F'OSTER CITY MENLO PARK PALO ALTO SAN MATEO
LEAF BLOWERS
HOURS
Weekdays 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. in
residential zones
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in
residential districts
9 a.m. to 5 p.m.8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
in residential
zones and within
100 feet ofa
residential zone
8 a.m. to 5 p.m,9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
No internal
combustion
blowers after
71/2002 n a
residential zone
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. "
in residential
zones
Saturdays 10 a,m. to 7 p,m. in
residential zones
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in
residential districts
l0 a.m. to 5 p.m. -
no gas-powered and
homeowner/resident
only
9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
in residential
zones and within
100 feet ofa
residential zone
Residents/owner
s only:
I I a.m. to 5 p.m.
- electric
1l a.m. to 3 p.m.
- gas-powered
l0 a.m. to 4 p.m.9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Sundays l0 a.m. to 6 p.m. -
owner or resident of
property - in
residential zones
Noon to 4 p.m. in
residential districts
None None in
residential zones
or within 100
feet of a
residential zone
No gas-powered
Electric 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.
None None
Holidays Same as Sundays in
residential zones
Same as Sundays
in residential
districts
None -- based on
Hillsborough holiday
calendar
Same as
Sundays in
residential zones
or within 100
feet of
residential zones
No gas-powered
Electric 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.
None None
1
CURRENT
BURLINGAME
PROPOSED
BURLINGAME
HILLSBOROUGH FOSTER CITY MENLO PARK PALO ALTO SAN MATEO
DECIBELS None 65 dbA in
residential districts
70 dB 50-65dBin
residential zones
60-70dBin
commercial
zones
Gas-powered
65 dB
Electric - 85 dB
65 dBA
STANDARDS FOR
LEAFBLOWERS
None Manufacturer's
label required - c
l#J3€e*einirg
ee*tc*re+irea
{brsmcreiel
cpr*as; mufflers
and extension
tubes must be
attached
70 dB measured
from 25 feet
Applies to gas-
powered blowers
only
Certification
required for gas-
powered
Manufacturer's
label required;
training required
for commercial
operators;
mufflers and
extension tubes
must be attached
Equipment
required
2
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 2t20t2002
7b
STAFF REPORT
TO Honorahle T\zfavor and cil SUBMITTED
BY
DATE Fehruarv 7 2002 APPROVED
BY
FROM Larrv E. Anderson- Citv
STIBJECT:
INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9.04 TO PROVIDE A 3.YEAR LICENSE
FOR DOGS AND TO UPDATE LICENSE AND FEE SCHEDULE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL
RECOMMENDATION:
Introduce ordinance to amend Chapter 9.04 to conform to County Animal Control Ordinance for dog licenses
and fee schedule by:
Request the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
Waive further reading of the proposed ordinance.
Introduce the proposed ordinance.
Direct the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before its
proposed adoption.
DISCUSSION:
The County has recently adopted an ordinance making it possible for owners of dogs to purchase a3-year
license with some cost savings to both the owner and the County. An annual license would also be available.
In addition, the County fee schedule provides a senior discount for persons who are 60 years of age or older to
encourage seniors to have pets.
Finally, the Municipal Code does not reflect increases in fees for transportation and boarding of impounded
animals.
The proposed ordinance would bring the Municipal Code provisions into conformity with the County's fee
schedule and provide a3-year license option to dog owners.
Attachment
Proposed ordinance
Distribution
Chief of Police
1.
2.
J.
4.
t
I
2
a
-)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
21
22
Z)
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 9.04 TO
PROVIDE FOR 3.YEAR LICENSES FOR DOGS AND TO UPDATE THE LICENSE AND
FEE SCHEDULE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows
Section 1. The County of San Mateo has provided the animal licensing and oversight services
for the City of Burlingame for a number of years. As part of the County's efforts to provide a more
effective but less intrusive program, the County has instituted a license for dogs for 3 years, rather than
a strictly annual program. This program is optional and dependent on proper vaccination clearance.
[r addition, the County has updated its license and caring fee schedule.
Section 2. A new Section 9.04.045 is adopted to read as follows:
9.04.045 Three-year licenses for dogs.
Notwithstanding section 9.04.045 above, a three-year license may be obtained for a dog,
excluding wolf-hybids, by submitting to the licensing program adequate proof of a three-year rabies
vaccination ofthe animal to be licensed andpayment of the applicable fees as set forth in this chapter.
Section 3. Section 9.04.031 is amended to read as follows:
9.4.031 Schedule of fees and charges.
Feesandcharges@underthischaptershallbeasfollows:
(a) License fees and penalties:
(l) Unaltered dog
(A) l-year license $21.00 $2OS0
(B) 3-year license $63.00
(C) 1-i,ear license with senior discount $1 1.00
{D) 3-"vear license rvith senior discount $33.00
1
t
il
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(2) Altered dog
(A) l-year license $11.00
(B) 3-year license $30.00
(C) I -year license with serrior discount $ 6.00
(D) 3-year license with senior discount $15.00
(3 ) Wolf-hybrid registration
(A) Unaltered l-year license 521.00
(B) Altered l-year license $11.00
(4) Additional Penalties and Fees
(A) Late penalty $ 5.001€30
(B) Duplicate tag $ 5.00 3i€e
(b) Redemption and shelter charges
(l) Tlpe A (large-size animals * horses, cows, etc.)
(A) Impound cost $50.00
(B) Board cost per day $16.00 8:0e
(C) Transportation cost $50.00 3Of0 per animal
(2)Type B (medium-size animals * hogs, sheep, etc.)
(A) Impound cost $30.00
(B) Board cost per day $12.00 trO
(C) Transportation cost $50.00 3ef,0 p'cranimal per use
(3) Type C (dogs/wolf hybirds, cats)
(A) Impound cost (Unaltered / Altered) $zef,e
(i) First offense, licensed & wearing tag $20.00 / 40.00
(ii) First offense, unlicensed or no tag $30.00 / 60.00
(iii) Second offense $60.00 / 80.00
(iv) Third offense ornroro $90.00 / 100.00
(v) Fourlh offense $120.00 i 140.00
(vi) Fifth offense and up $150.00 / 170.00
2
t
I
,)
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(B) Board costs
(i) Dogs/wolf hybrids $10.00 per day
(ii) Cats $ 7.00 per day
@(cat$
fne'ounarcosf
(a) Type D (small-size animals - birds, harnsters, etc.)
(A) Impound cost $5.00
(B) Board cost per day $ 2.001J0
(c) Quarantine fee $35.00 ffiO
(d) Dangerous animal permit fee $100.00
(e) Field return fee $25.00 ?9frO
(f) Property inspection fee $25.00
(g) For purposes of this section, "senior discount" is given only to persons who are sixty
(60) years of age or older and who provide proof of their age in accordance with licensing
directions.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of
2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of _,2002, by the following vote
1J
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
t8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES : COIINCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
4
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
February 8,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENOA
ITEM #
MTG.2t20t02
8a
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTTON TO SUPPORT STATE LEGISLATION TO FIX TH Y AREA REGIONAL WATER
SYSTEM AND PROTECT OUR RESIDENTS FROM CATASTROPHIC WATER OUTAGES
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the attached resolution supporting AB 1823 and
authorize the mayor to execute the attached transmittal letter to the chair of the State Committee considering this
legislation.
BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame receives all of its water from a Bay Area regional water system operated
by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). The system also serves approximately 2.4 million
persons who live in San Francisco as well as Alameda, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties.
Studies completed over the last five years have concluded that the regional system is in exffemely poor condition and
would be subject to catastrophic damage in the event of a major earthquake, including the loss of water for
Burlingame of 60 days. The SFPUC has delayed for several years approving a multi-billion dollar construction
program to improve the regional water system and has not acted to obtain financing for the work.
DISCUSSION: State Assembly members Papan and Simitian are introducing the attached Assembly Bill 1823 to
address the water improvement program and related concerns. Following is a summary of the legislation:o requires the SFPUC to adopt the regional water system capital improvement program by February 1,2003.
The program must be 50% completed by 2010 and 100% completed by 20L5.. requires the SFPUC to complete nine critical projects by specific dates ranging from October 2004 to April
20tt.o requires the SFPUC to prepare a water emergency response plan in consultation with the Bay Area Water
Users Association (BAWUA) of which Burlingame is a member.. requires the SFPUC to distribute available water during any interruption in supply on an equitable basis.o requires the SFPUC to pursue securing supplemental back-up water supplies for drought protection. requires the SFPUC to operate Hetch Hetchy reservoirs for water supply first, rather than power production.o directs the Department of Health Safety to require the SFPUC to deliver water that meets state drinking water
standards.. requires the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to audit the SFPUC's preventative maintenance
program biannually.o provides that if the SFPUC master contract wittr BAWUA is not renewed or extended when it expires in 2009,
the California PUC will set the water rates charged to BAWUA members.o directs the DWR to assume control of the SFPUC regional water system if necessary to assure compliance with
this legislation.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Transmittal Letter; AB 1823
BUDGET IMPACT: Approval of the resolution does not have a financial impact. The cost of future regional water
system improvements benefitting Burlingame will be included in the price charged for SFPUC water.
6s0-558-7230c: City Clerk
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Repots\ABl823 SUPPORT-WATER SR.wpd
The City of Barlingame
MARY JANNEY, MAYOR
MIKE COFFEY, VICE MAYOR
ROSATIE M. O'MAHOI.IY
JOE GAI.I.IGAN
CATHY BAYLOCK
CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CAUFORNIA 9401 0.3997
TEL: {650) 558-7200
FAX: (650! 342-8386
www.burlingame,org
DRAFT
FINAL TO INCLUDE COMMITTEE NAME
AND CHAIRPERSON NAME
February 20,2002
Committee
The State Assembly
State Capitol, Room 2141
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: AB 1823 - Support
Dear Chair
On behalf of the City of Burlingame, I am writing to urge your committee to approve AB 1823, introduced by
Assemblyman Louis J. Papan @-Millbrae), jointly authored by Assemblyman Joe Simitian @-Palo Alto), and
co-authored by Assemblyman John Dutra @-Fremont), to help fix the earthquake-vulnerable Bay Area regional
water system.
The attached resolution expresses the City of Burlingame's serious concern about the possibility of our
communitybeingwithoutwater fromthe systemforup to 60 days. Thehealth, safetyandeconomic risks ofsuch
a catastrophic outage are unacceptable for our community. This is a regional problem affecting 2.4 million
people, thousands ofbusinesses, andvitalcommunityorganizations. The state andthe nationdependonavibrant
BayAreaeconomy.InBurlingame,over28,000residentsandemployers,includingPeninsu1aHospitalasvre
as l0 major hotels with more than 3500 rooms depend on water from the regional system.
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), which operates the Bay Area regional water system,
has failed for several years to approve a multi-billion dollar Capital Improvement Program to fix the system and
has not acted to obtain financing to pay for the necessary work. In addition, the SFPUC has not shown an ability
to manage and complete a construction program ofthis size, which will be ten times larger than any construction
progftrm for the water system that it has undertaken.
t
Committee
The State Assembly
February 20,2002
Page2
DRAFT
Because this matter concerns the health, safety and well being of our constituents, action must not be delayed.
We believe that AB 1823 includes the types of incentives, oversight, and action at the state level which are
needed to ensure that the Bay Area regional water system is fixed as soon as possible without calling for a change
in the system's ownership.
Sincerely
Mary Janney
Mayor
cc:Members of the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee
Assemblyman Louis J. Papan
Assemblyman Joe Simitian
Assemblyman John Dutra
Burlingame City Council
S:\A Public Works Directory\StatrReports\AB1823 Letter.wpd
-
CALIFORNTA LEGISLATURE-2o01=02 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1823
Introduced by Assembly Members Papan and Simitian
(Coauthor: Assembly Member Dutra)
January 18,2402
An act to add Division 20.5 (commencing with Section 73500) to the
Water Code, relating to regional water systems.
LEGISLATWE COUNSELS DIGEST
AB 1823, as introduced, Papan. Regional water systems.
(l) Under existing law, the City and County of San Francisco (city)
operates the Hetch Hetchy Project as a regional water delivery system,
supplying water to persons and entities in the city and the Counties of
Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
This bill would enact the Wholesale Regional Water System Security
and Reliability Act, which would impose various requirements on
wholesale regional water systems, as defined, thereby imposing a
state-mandated program. The bill would require the city, by February
1, 2003, to adopt a capital improvement program. The bill would
require the city, in consultation with other entities, to adopt an
emergency response plan by Septernber l, 2003. The bill would require
a regional wholesale water supplier, as defined, to distribute available
water during any intemrption to all customers on an equitable basis. The
bill would require the city to operate reservoirs in the Counties of
Tuolumne and Stanislaus in a manner that assigns first priority to water
delivery.
The bill would require a regional wholesale water supplier, when
shortage conditions exist, to make available the facilities of the regional
water system forthe conveyance of supplemental water. The bill would
99
t-
AB 1823 -2 -
require the State Department of Health Services to require a regional
wholesale water supplier to deliver water that meets state and federal
drinking water standards, except as specified. The bill would require the
Department of Water Resources to conduct an audit relating to the bay
area regional water system and an audit of other regional water systems.
The bill would subject the rates charged the bay area wholesale
customers by the city to the jirisdiction of the Public Utilities
Commission if a specified agreement is not renewed or extended by
June 30, 2009, unless the city and the wholesale customers that are
public agencies form a special district to operate the regional water
system. If that special district is formed, the bill would impose the
requirements of the act on that district instead of the city, except as
otherwise provided. The bill would require the department to assume
control of the bay area regional water system for the purpose of
implementing the requirements of the act if the city fails to do so, and
would prohibit the city from receiving state funds for use in connection
with the regional water system until it becomes a member of a special
district formed to operate that system.
The bill would require the city to prepare various reports il
connection with its operation of the bay area regional water system. The
new requirements established by the bill for the city would impose a
state-mandated local program. The bill would require a regional
wholesale water supplier to reimburse the State Department of Health
Services and the department for costs incurred in connection with
implementing the requirements imposed by the act. The bill would
require the bay area wholesale customers to reimburse the city for their
share of costs. The bill would require wholesale customers of other
regional wholesale water suppliers to be responsible for reimbursing
the regional wholesale water supplier for the proportional share of costs
through the imposition of water charges.
(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act
for a specified reason.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
99
t-
3 AB 1823
The people of the State of Califurnia do enact asfollows:
I SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares as
2 follows:
: (a) The City and County of San Francisco has acquired or
4 constructed a system of reservoirs, pipelines and funnels, and
5 treatment plants that provides water to 2.4 million Californians
6 who live in San Francisco and in neighboring communities in the
7 Counties of Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
8 (b) Over two-thirds of the Californians who rely on San
9 Francisco's regional water system, approximately 1.6 million
10 persons, live outside San Francisco. A substantial majority of
l1 industrial, commercial, institutional, and governmental users are
12 also located outside San Francisco.
13 (c) The reliability of this water infrastructure system is of vital
14 importance to the health, welfare, safety, and economy of the
15 regionthat it supplies.
16 (d) In turn, this region is of vital importance to the entire State
l7 of California, because of the resident industries, universities, andl8 commercial enterprises that employ millions of Californians and
19 generate billions of dollars in exports and tax revenues to the state.20 (e) The regional water system is old, and designed to outdated2l seismic safety standards. The systern either crosses, is located on,
22 or is adjacent to, three major active earthquake faults, including the
23 Calaveras fault, the San Andreas fault and the Hayward fault.
24 Engineering investigations have disclosed that the system is at risk
25 of catastrophic failure in a major earthquake. Many areas in all
26 four counties served by the system face intemrptions in their
27 supplies of potable water for up to 30 days, and some areas could
28 be without water for as long as 60 days.29 (f) Interruptions in water supply of this magnitude and duration
30 to a densely populated metropolitan region would be disastrous for3l public health and safety and for the regional and state economy. In
32 addition, uncontrolled releases of water from pipelines, tunnels,
33 and reservoirs could create severe flood damage and
34 environmental harm to fish and wildlife habitat in the communities
35 in which water facilities are located.
36 (g) The Cify and County of San Francisco is not subject to
37 oversight by the Public Utilities Commission in the operation of
38 its water system. The substantial majority of Californians w,ho rely
99
r
AB 1823 -4-1 on the system live outside the corporate limits of San Francisco2 and do not have the right to vote for the elected officials of San3 Francisco who manage, directly or by appointment, the regional4 water system.5 (h) There are other aspects of the operation of the regional
6 water system that unfairly disadvantage legitimate interests of7 Californians in neighboring counties. These neighboring counties8 face exposure to severe water shortages due to drought and are not9 assured of the delivery of water that meets federal and state
10 drinking water standards. These uncertainties and risks discourage
11 industry from investing in the neighboring counties because access
LZ to a reliable supply of potable, fairly priced water is an important
13 element in plant location decisions.14 (i) The state has concerns for the safety, health, and the
15 economic strength of the region that warrant requiring San
16 Francisco to take prudent steps in a timely mannff to safeguard all
17 Californians who live in the areas dependent on San Francisco's
18 regional water system and to exercise stewardship over the systan
19 in a way that recognizes its regional nature and statewide
20 importance.21 0) The state has similar concerns with any other regional water
22 system that is owned and operatedby a local govemmental agency
23 that is not subject to the jurisdiction of the state Public Utilities
24 Commission and that furnishes water on a wholesale basis to
25 substantial geographic areas outside its boundaries, the residents
26 of which are not entitled to vote for the local elected offrcials who
27 control the regional water system. Specific provisions of Division
28 20.5 (commencing with Section 73500) of the Water Code, as
29 added by this act, Lre intended to apply to any other regional
30 wholesale water supplier that provides water to wholesale
customers serving, in the aggregate, 1.5 million or more persons
who are not residents of the regional wholesale water supplier.
SEC. 2. Division 20.5 (commencing with Section 73500) is
added to the Water Code, to read:
DIVISION 20.5. WHOLESALE REGIONAL WATER
SYSTEM SECURITY AND RELIABILITY ACT
73500. This division shall be known as and may be cited as the
40 Wholesale Regional Water System Security and Reliability Act.
3l
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
99
l-
-s- AB 1823
I 73501. (a) Unless the context otherwise requires, the2 definitions set forth in this section govern the construction of this3 division.4 (b) "Association" means the San Francisco Bay Area Water5 Users Association.
6 (c) "Bay area regional water system" means the facilities for
7 the storage, treatmefit, and transmission of water located in the
8 Counties of Tuolumne, Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Alameda, Santa9 Clara, and San Mateo, together with three terminal reservoirs in
10 the city.11 (d) "Bay area wholesale customers" means the 26 public
12 agencies in the Counties of San Mateo, Alameda, and Santa Clara
13 that purchase water &om the ci$ pursuant to the master water sales
14 contract, including the Alameda County Water District, the City
15 of Brisbane, the Cif of Burlingame, the Coastside County Water
16 District, the City of Daly City, the City of East Palo Alto, the Estero
17 Municipal Improvement District, Guadalupe Valley Municipal
18 Improvement District, City of Hayward, the Town of
19 Hillsborough, the Los Trancos County Water District, the City of
20 Menlo Park, the Mid-Peninsula Water District, the City of2l Millbrae, the City of Milpitas, the City of Mountain View, the
22 North Coast County Water District, the City of Palo Alto, the
23 Purissima Hills Water District, the City of Redwood City, the City
24 of San Bruno, the City of San Jose, the City of Santa Clara, the
25 Skyline County Water District, the City of Sunnyvale, and the
26 Westborough Water District, Stanford University, the California
27 Water Service Company, and the Cordilleras Mutual Water
28 Association.29 (e) "CrE" means the City and County of San Francisco.30 (f) "Master water sales contract" means the agreement entitled3l "Settlement Agteement and Master Water Sales Contract between
32 the City and County of San Francisco and Certain Suburban
33 Purchasers" entered into in 1984 by the city and the wholesale
34 customers.35 (g) "Regional water system" means facilities for the storage,
36 treatment, and transmission of water owned and operated by a
37 regional wholesale water supplier, other than the city.38 (h) "Regional wholesale water supplier" means any clty,
39 county, or city and county, including the city, that operates a
40 regional water system, and fumishes water on awholesale basis to
99
r
AB 1823 6
local government agencies and public utilities that, in turn, supply
water to a combined population of 1.5 million or more residents
of geographic areas outside the boundary of the regional wholesale
water supplier.
(i) "Wholesale customers" means local government agencies
and public utilities, iacluding, but not limited to, the bay area
wholesale customers, that purchase water from a regional
*holesale water supplier and distribute that water to retail
customers in their respective service areas.
73502. (a) The city, on or before February l, 2003, shall
adopt the program of capital improvement projects designed to
restore and improve the regional water system that are described
in the capital improvement program report prepared by the San
Francisco Public Utilities Commission dated August 2001. A copy
of the program shall be submitted, on or before March 1, 2003, to
the department and the State Department of Health Services. The
program shall include a schedule for the completion of design and
award of contract, ffid commencement and completion of
construction ofeach described project. The schedule shall require
that projects representing 50 percent ofthe total program cost be
completed on or before 2010 and that projects representing 100
percent of the total progr,lm cost be completed on or before 2015.
The program shall also contain a financing plan. The city shall
review the program every three years and update it as necessary
except that the percentage completion requirements set forth in
this section may not be modified.
(b) The plan shall require completion of the following projects
by the following dates:
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
t4
l5
16
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3l
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Project
2. Crystal Springs Pump Station
& Pipeline
3^ BDPLI&2 Repairof
Caissons,/Pipe Bridge
4. BDPL Pipeline Upgrades at
Hayward Fault
Location Completion Date
Alameda/Santa May 2007
Clara
San Mateo County April 20ll
Alameda/San December 2006
Mateo
Alameda County Novernber 2007
99
l. kvington Tunnel Altsmative
t-
-7 - AB 1823
I 5. Calaveras Fault Crossing Alameda County June 2009
2 Upgrade
3 S" Crystal Springs Bypass Pipeline San Mateo County February 2008
4 7. BDPL Cross Connections 3 & 4 Alameda/Santa October 2fi)4
5 clara
6 S. Conveyance Capacity West of Alameda/Santa October 2008
7 Irvington Tunnel ClaralSan Mateo
8 S. Calaveras Dam Seisrnic Alameda County July 2ffi7
9 Improvements
1011 (c) The city shall submit a repofi to the Legislature, the
12 department, and the State Department of Health Services, on orl3 before Febnrary I ofeach year, sholying the progress made on each
14 of the projects included in the progmm during the previous
15 calendaryear
16 73503. (a) The city, in consultation with the association and
17 the offrces of emergancy services in Alameda Counry Santa Clara
18 County, and San Mateo County, shall prepare an emergency
19 response plan describing how water service will be restored to the
20 area served by the regional water system after an intemtption2l caused by earthquake or other natural or manmade catastrophe. A
22 draft of the plan shall be submitted to the Offrce of Emergency
23 Services on or before July l, 2003, for comment and shall be
24 adopted by the clty on or before Septernber 1,2003, and thereafter
25 shall be implemented.26 (b) During any interruption in supply caused by earttrquake, or
27 other natural or manmade catastrophe, a regional wholesale water
28 supplier shall distribute all available water to all customers on an
29 equitable basis, without preference or discrimination based on a
30 customer's geographic location within or outside the boundary of
31 the regional wholesale water supplier.32 735M. (a) Commencing in 2003,aregional wholesale water
33 supplier shall submit a report to the Legislature and the State
34 Department of Health Services, on or before February I of each
35 year, describing the progress made during the previous calendar
36 year on securing supplemental sources of water to augment
37 existing supplies during dry years.38 (b) In order to assist in improving the bay area regional water
39 system's reliabiliry the city shall operate the reservoirs located in
4A the Counties of Tuolumne and Stanislaus in a manner that assigns
99
t-
AB 1823 -8-I first priority to water delivery and second priority to the2 generulion of hydroelectric energy. On orbefore February 1,2004,3 the city shall submit its plan of operations ("ruIe curve") to the4 department. The department shall review and may order any5 changes it considers necessary or appropriate to implement this6 division. The city shall comply with the department's orders.I (c) During any period when shortage conditions exist, or would8 exist in absence of a transfer, a regional wholesale water supplier9 shall make regional water system facilities available to conveyl0 water secured by a joint powers authority of wholesale customers,
I I a special district formed by wholesale customers, or one or more
12 wholesale customers for use by one or more wholesale customers.l3 73505. The State Department of Health Services shall require
14 a regional wholesale water supplier to deliver treated water that
15 meets state and federal drinking water standards to all wholesale
16 customers except those, if any, that operate their own filtration
17 plants and whose individual water supply contracts expressly
18 relieve the regional wholesale water supplier from an obligation
19 to deliver water meeting those standards.20 73506. The department shall conduct an audit, or arrange for2l an audit to be performed by contract, of the city's program of22 maintenance of the bay area regional water system during 200323 and during each odd-numbered year thereafter through 2009. The24 audit shall include both of the following:25 (a) A review of the adequacy of the city's procedures and26 resources for all of the following:27 (l) Identifuing needed maintenance.28 (2) Planning, budgeting, scheduling, and completing
29 maintenance.
30 (3) Recordkeeping of maintenance activities.3l (b) A field investigation of the major facilities of the bay area32 regional water system to determine the general condition of those33 facilities and the adequacy of existing maintenance efforts. The34 department shall submit a report to the Legislature on its findings35 and recommendations based on the initial audit on or before36 February l, 2004, and on or before February I of each37 even-numbered year thereafter through 2010.38 73506.5. The department shall conduct an audit of the
39 regional water systems operated by all regional wholesale water40 suppliers, other than the city, subject to this division and shall
99
I
-9 - AB 1823
I submit to the Legislature a report thereon on or before February2 1,2006.
3 73507. (a) If the city does not renew or extend the master4 water sales contract with all bay area wholesale customers on or5 before June 30, 2AA9, the rates charged the bay area wholesale6 customers by the city shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the7 Public Utilities Commission and the rates may not be increased8 after July l, 2009, without prior approval of the Public Utilities9 Commission.l0 (b) The Public Utilities Commission shall have jurisdiction
I I over rates charged to wholesale customers by other regional
12 wholesale water suppliers commencing July 1, 2009, if those rates
13 are not governed by contracts between the regional wholesale
14 water suppliers and their wholesale customers.15 73508. If the city and the bay area wholesale customers that
16 are public agencies form a special district with authority and
17 responsibility to own, operate, and manage the bay area regionall8 water system and whose governing board's composition reflects
19 the proportionate use of water delivered by the bay area regional
20 water system within the city and within the aggregate geographic2l area served by the bay area wholesale customers, the obligations
22 imposed on the city by this division shall be applicable to that23 district, except that the Public Utilities Commission may not have
24 jurisdiction over rates charged by that district. The city shall be
25 relieved of all obligations under this division at the time the
26 ownership and control of the bay area regional water system are27 transferred to that district.28 73509. This division may be enforced by any wholesale
29 customer.30 73510. The department shall assume control of the bay area
3 I regional water system for the limited purpose of implementing this
32 division if the city fails or refuses to comply with the requirements
33 of this division, including, but not limited to, failing orrefusing to
34 adhere to the schedule set forth in the plan required by Section
35 73502.36 73511. The city may not receive state funds for use in
37 connection with the bay area regional water system until it
38 becomes a member of a special district of the type described in
39 Section 73508.
99
t-
AB 1823 - 10 -I 73512. A regional wholesale water supplier shall reimburse2 the state for all costs incurred by the State Department of Health3 Services or the department in carrying out the duties imposed by4 this division. The bay area wholesale customers shall reimburse5 the city for their share of those costs as provided in the master6 water sales contract. The wholesale customers of regional7 wholesale water suppliers other than the city are responsible for8 reimbursing the regional wholesale water supplier for their9 proportionate share of those costs, through the imposition of water
10 charges.ll 73513. Nothing in this division affects the rights and
12 obligations of the city, the Modesto Irrigation District, or the
13 Turlock Irrigation District, as between themselves, whether
14 arising from statute or contract.15 SEC. 3. The provisions of this division are severable. If any
16 provision of this division or its application is held invalid, that
17 invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications thal can
18 be given effect without the invalid provision or application.19 SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
20 Section 6 of Article )CII B of the California Constitution because2l a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service
22 charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or
23 level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of
24 Section 17556 of the Government Code.
o
99
r
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
2t20to2
8b
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
February 7, 2OO2 BY
APPROVED
BYPUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUT!ON AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT . 2, SCADA MASTER PLAN
AND CONTRACT DOCUMENT PREPARATION WITH CYBERNET CONSULTING - CP 9940
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached Agreement Amendment No. 2 for
Professional Engineering Services with CyberNet Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $25,170.
BACKGROUND: In August 2001, a professional services contract was issued to CyberNet Consulting, Inc. in the amount
of $64,920 to prepare a Master Plan and Construction Documents for a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) Project. The project involves evaluation of existing equipment, controls and devices at various pump stations,
tanls, and reservoirs throughout the City. The project also involves the design of a state of the art SCADA system which
will provide central control, safety, monitoring and operation of various water, wastewater, and storm drain facilities.
Agreement Amendment No. 1 was approved on October l, 2001, in the amount of $38,180 to provide additional
engineering services which included (1) designing additional electronic controls, monitoring devices and hardware, and
(2) performing a radio survey to evaluate existing radio frequencies and designing a compatible radio system.
DISCUSSION:
Amendment No. 2, in the amount of $25,170 is needed to provide the following continuation of services:
o
a
Prepare bid documents, provide assistance to the City during the bid
process, assist with a two-day pre-bid meeting, evaluate the technical bids
and make an award recommendation.
Provide Washington Park well hardware and software design package.
Total
$2t,970
$ 3.200
$25,170
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement Amendment with Exhibit A
BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds available for this Agreement Amendment No. 2 in the approvedz}}ll)2
Capital Improvement budget.
Douglas
Senior Civil Engineer
650-558-7230
c: City Clerk
CyberNet Consulting, Inc.
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\92o AGR AMEND 2.wpd
AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CYBERNET CONSULTING. INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 9940
THIsAGREEMENT,madeinduplicateandenteredintothisdayof-,
2002, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
'CITY' and CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC., hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT,'
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT have previously entered into an agreement for certain
services, said agreement being dated AUGUST 13, 2001; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to amend said agreement as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Amendment of Agreement
Said agreement dated AUGUST L3 , 2001 , is hereby amended to include those revisions
in services and compensation set forth in EXHIBIT uAu, attached hereto.
2. In all other respects said agreement dated AUGUST L3 , 2001 , shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on the day and
year first above written.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A municipal corporation Approved as to form:
By
Director of Public Works City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
S:\A Public Works DirecIory\PROJECTS\9940\AGREEMENTAMENDMENT 2.wpd
Consultant
February 4,2002
George Bagdon, Director of Public Works
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
SubJect: Proposal to Provide Engineering Servaces Related to the Bid Period of the
SCADA System Upgrade
Dear Mr. Bagdon:
As per the City's request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide engineering
services related to the bid period of the SCADA System Upgrade. Subsequent to discussions
with the City representatives and our understanding of the project requirements, we have
developed the scope of work below to meet the City's requirements related to this subject.
SCOPE OFWORK
BIDDING PERIOD ASSISTANCE
1.a Provide clarifications to the prospeclive bidders and prepare addenda if necessary.
'l.b Provide Evaluation Criteria. Provide the City with an evaluation criteria to be
included in the bid documenb. All bidders to be required to submit a technical and
a cost proposal. Technical proposals are to be prepared according to the
evaluation criteria requirements. Both the bid price and technical proposal will
have pre-determined values. The most responsible and responsive bidder who
scores the highest would be recommended for award of the contract.
l.c Software Presentation And Bidding Clarification. Coordinate and attend a
demonstration of three HMI software packages at the City.
Aftend a pre-bid conference; accompany prospective contractors on a job-walk;
provide clarifications and prepare addenda as required.
Review and evaluate up to six bid packages received. Each respondent's technical
proposal will be evaluated based on the pre-published evaluation criteria.
2.
3.
EXHIBIT A, Page I of 4
The objective would be to provide engineering assistance to the City staff to respond to
inquiries during the bid period, to prepare addenda if needed, to tabulate bids and check the
bids for completeness and responsiveness, and assist the City in the evaluation and selection
of the most qualified bidder. lt is assumed that the City would handle any bidding iregularities
or protests.
February 4,2OO2
Mr. George Bagdon, Direclor of Public Works
City of Burlingame
Proposal to Provide Bid Phase Assistance forthe SCADA System Upgrade
Page 2 ol2
EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 4
Attend a meeting with City staff to review results of the evaluation and to provide a
final recommendation for contract award.
FEE SCHEDULE
It is estimated that the bid period will take about a month and a half to complete from the time
the p@ec{ is advertised. The not to exceed fee for professional engineering services as
described in the scope of work is . A fee breakdown is attached.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We are prepared to continue, upon the
conclusion of the study and design phases, to provide the City with the engineering services
enumerated above upon approval of this proposal.
Respectfully submitted,
CyberNet Gonsulting, lnc.
Copy: Mr. Doug Bell, COB
S€rvor1 :\Budingam6wopos6ls\sc€& bid prop rcv1
4
Cyrus Moaveni, PE
President
City of Burlingamo
SCADA Bid Period Foo Esdmatos
Alr Fsrs Car RentalT83kPrlnclpal Eng.srnlor Eng,Stoff Eng.Support Eng.Lodglng Per Dlom
16.16.
70 00$55 00s1@.00$
Hours
Ratc
Iotal $ 1,6(ru.OLl 1,440.(ru5 $$s 3.040.00 $3,040.00
'l.a Provid6 Clarificatbns & lssus Addenda
100 00$3 9o.00 s 70.m s 55 00
Hours
Rato
Iotal !5,ArJ.(IJ !I t $3,z(Xl.OO $3,2q).m
1.b ProviJe Evaluation Critrria
2 daysjob walk + chrifications & addsnda
10.w
$ 100.00
24.@$ 90.00 $70.m 55.00
ats $100.00 5 90.00 $70.00 $55.00
s $80.m s 460.m s 100.m s 640.00 $3.680.00TotaliI,U.W !l,{u.w )$
mx
J
@
-l
't,
ll,(O
(D
(r)
o
-hsCrtf,il.t Cffiullhe , |rc.
F.nrury l,2m2
EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 4
PWTENG {lortensen;' Doris
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Cyrus Moaveni [cyrus@cybemet+onsufting.com]
Tuesday, November06,2001 2:01 PM
Dgbawp@aol.com
Re: lnclusion of the water well in the SCADA system
Doug,
I re.viewed our.original proposal related to this subject, and find it still valid. For your convenience I have included the textof the proposal below.
Ta2!<Tr lncotpo,a,te washington.well & Pump stafion into the upgrade scADA sysfem \a. Review available documentation and as-builts on th.e_e4istlngj rionitoring and c6ntrcl system to determine best -'-\
glte,mative.fgy incorporating.fhis. srfe in.to the ypgnde.$pAQA sysfem. flhis srfe is cuneitty equipped with fietd
instrumentation, a PLC and a stand-alone PCwith aWonderuarc HMI'oackaoe.l
b. lnclude the rcsults of this effoft in the SCADA Master Plan, includingj reconim6ndations.
c. Provide functional specification-s^for the equipment to be included ii Phase 1 of the SCADA sysfem construction.
Not to exceed fee estimate: $3,200
Completion schedule: 1 week
We would need a written authorization (such as a response to this email)fom the City to include this site in the SCADAproject as described above. Thank you.
Regards,
Cyrus Moaveni, PE
CyberNet Consulting, lnc.
a
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
8c
STAFF REPORT
TO
BY
DATE: Februarv 7.2002 APPRO
BY
FROM:Larry E. Anderson. Citv Attorney
AUTHORIZE CITY ATTORNEY TO JOIN IN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF IN OAK CREEK
ESTATES VS. TOWN OF PARADISE, CASE NOS. C038577 & C039424 AT NO COST TO
CITY
STJBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to the City in Oak Creek Estates vs. Town of Paradise, which
is now pending before the California Court of Appeals.
DISCUSSION:
This case involves the tangled issue of when the provisions of the Permit Streamlining Act override a
community's general plan and the Subdivision Map Act.
As outlined in the enclosed letter, the Town of Paradise struggled to approve development of a subdivision.
After a lengthy EIR and mapping process, a lower intensity tentative map was approved. However, the
developer challenged the approval and through court maneuvers, the developer ended up with a final
subdivision map that did not match what the Town had approved!
The appeal requests the Court of Appeals to untangle this mess, and provide clear direction under State law as to
the obligations of agencies and developers in processing subdivision maps and conforming to the agency's
general plan.
It is recommended that the City join in the amicus brief to seek this clarification.
Attachment
January 3l,2002,letter from Fox & Sohagi
2t20t2002
Honorable Mavor and Council
LA\^/ OFFICES
DEBORAH J. FOX
MARGARET MOORE SOHAGI
SARAH M. HART
JOCELYN A. JULIAN
JEREMY J. SANTIAGO
PHILIP A. SEYMOUR
OF COUNSEL
Fox g SoHaGr, LLP
A REGISTEREE, LIMITEO LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
10960 Wruurnr Boureveno, Surrr 1270
Los ANceles, CauronNre
90024-3702
January 31,2002
FACSIMILE(3to\ 144-7A13
TELEPHONE(3to) 444-7805
RECENED
tEB 4 ?00:)
qIff^w
&
TECICLEO PAPER
City Attomey
Oak Creek Estates v. Town of Paraciise, 'l-hird District Court of Appeai
Nos. C0i8577 and C0i9424
Dear Colleague
On behalf of the Town of Paradise, our office joins with the Legal Advocacy
Committee of the League of California Cities in urging you to add your city as amicus in
this important case titled Oak Creek Estates v. Town of Paradise involving "deemed
approval" of projects under the Permit Strearnlining Act and Subdivision Map Act. By
action on December 18, 2OOl, the Board of Directors reconrmended that cities join the
amicus brief that is being prepared by Margaret M. Sohagi and Deborah J. Fox of Fox &
Sohagi under the review of Rob Ewing, Town Attorney for Danville. Several cities have
already indicated their support for Paradise's position.
Project History
The underlying facts of this case involve the Townls review and approval of Oak
Creek's tentative subdivision map application for a 177-lot residential subdivision project
known as Oak Creek Estates ("the Project"). After a lengthy pre-application review, and
numerous deficient submittals, this tentative subdivision map application was accepted as
complete by the Town in March 1992. The Project was the largest residential subdivision
ever proposed in the Town, and there was and remains significant public opposition to the
Project.
In response to concerns identified in a draft environmental impact report ("EIR")
for the Project rn 1993, Oak Creek suspended environmental review of the Project in
order to redesign the Project. In 1994, O.ak Creek submitted a revised tentative
subdivision map and accompmyrng materials, downqizing the froject to 150 lots. The
Oak Creek redesigns were responsibtE for sigruficant portioqs of the delay in completing
Re
Fox g Souacr, LLP
City Attorney
January 31,2002
Page 2
,',.].,,
In 1995,.after further changes to the Project, the Town's nfanning dbL-ission
certified a final EIR, and conditionally approved a tentative subdivision map for the
Project at a density of l3l lots. The Southeast Paradise Resident's Alliance ("SEPRA"),
a citizens group opposing the Projec! pursued an appeal of the Plailling Commission's
approval of the Project at the 13l-lot density before the Town Council. During the
appeal, Oak Creek agreed to the completion of a supplemental EIR regarding the
construction of a connector road which was one of the conditions of approval attached to
the tentdtive rirap{t the 131-lot'derisi{y, and the appeal heaiiiig was continued to
accommodate completion of the supplemental EIR.
In June 1996, the Town Council denied SEPRA's appeal and certified both the
Project EIR and the supplemental EIR. The Town Council also adopted a motion of
intent to approve the Project at an 82-lot density, consistent with a reduced-density
alternative identified in the final EIR. The Town Council also concluded that
consfruction of the oonnector,road should not be a condition of Project approval.
[n response, prior to the Town's final hearing to consider approval of the Projecf
Oak Creek submitted newly-revised tentative subdMsion maps showing 95 and 82 lots,
respectively. Finally, in September of 1996, the Town Council adopted a resolution
conditionally approving the Project at the 82lot density.
Litigotion History
In October 1996 Oak Creek filed a petition for writ of mandate and complaint for
damages chattenging the Town's September 1996 conditional approval of the tentative
- subdivtsionm*ap-afa redrrcbd &ilsity'bf'82"10ts.'' The pedtiorVcomplaint alleged that the'
Project had been deemed approved by operation of law under the applicable provisions of
the Permit Sftearnlining Act (Government Code $ 65956(b)) and the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code 5 66452.4) over three years previously. In addition to this mandamus
proceeding, the petition/complaint also alleged claims for damages arising from inverse
condemnation and civil rights violations against the Town, as well as certain individual
members of the Town Council and Town staff.t
t Oak Creek's 42 U.S.C. $ 1983 civil rights claim involved broad allegations of
violations of Oak Creek's rights of substantive due process, procedural due process, and
equal protection.
l
Fox g Sonecr, LLP
City Attorney
January 31,2002
Page 3
In April 1999, following a bench trial on the mandamus petition, the trial court
issued a writ of mandate directing the Town to vacate and set aside its approval of the
Project at a reduced density of 82 lots, and to adopt a new resolution documenting the
deemed approval of Oak Creek's tentative subdivision map application at a density of 177
lots as originally proposed.
The Town's opportunities for immediate discretionary appellate review of the writ
decision wdre exhausted in July i999, whert the Califonria Supreme Court denied the
Town's petition for review. The Town then complied with the trial court's writ by
adopting a resolution approving the 177-lot tentative subdivision map application, as
commanded by the writ. That resolution also expressly stated the Town's inability to
make the necessary underlying findings of consistency with the Town general plan in so
approving the tentative map.
ln October 1999, the Town moved for summary judgment on Oak Creek's inverse
condemnation and civil rights claims. These claims were based on the theory that the
Town's actions after 1992, and particularly the ultimate approval of an 82-lot subdivision
in 1996, constituted an attempt to deprive Oak Creek of its property rights in the 177-lot
subdivision which had allegedly already been approved by default. After extensive
further proceedings, the trial court granted the Town's motion on the ground that Oak
Creek had failed to timely commence its inverse condemnation and civil rights claims
after the default approval, and that the default-approved map had now expired.
The trial court did not issue its final judgment until April 2001, at which time the
court affirmed the issuance of the writ and dismissed all of Oak Creek's claims for*. daniages: Oair Creek subsequently brought a"motion to enforcethe .writ in June }OAL
contending that the writ actually required the Town to issue approval of afinal
subdivision map rather than a tentative subdivision map. The trial court subsequently
issued a ruling that accepted Oak Creek's argument that the Town had not complied with
the terms of the writ, but no order was thereafter issued due to the trial court's apparent
belief that its jurisdiction to do so had been suspended by Oak Creek's filing of an appeal
in the intervening period. The trial court also denied a subsequent motion by the Town
seeking clarification of its rulings.
Oak Creek subsequently appealed the dismissal of its inverse condemnation and
civil rights claims. The Town cross-appealed as to the writ portions of the action, and
filed a separate appeal to the trial court's post-judgment rulings concerning whether the
Town was deemed to have approved a tentative or final subdivision map. Oak Creek's
Fox e SoH,{ct, LLP
City Attorney
January 31,2002
Page 4
appeal, the Town's.cross-appeal, and the Town's appeal to.post-judgment rulings, have
been consolidated by the Thfud District Court of Appeal.
Issues
Counsel for the Town has requested amicus support on a number of issues in this
case. Amicus counsel intends to addrlls thlfollowrng issues in its brief:
l. May a tentative map application be deemed approved under the Subdivision
Map Act or the Permit Strearnlining Act ("PSA") when the proposed project is
inconsistent with the governing general plan?
Z. May a court order the default approval and recording of a final subdivision
map under the provisions of the FSA or Subdivision Map Ac! even though the only
applications on file are for a tentative map,approval and the applicant has-never complied
with reasonable conditions imposed on a tentative map? , . .:- -
3. When a developer has caused or voluntarily acquiesced in processing and
approval delays, may a project nevertheless be deemed approved under either the
Subdivision Map Act or the PSA?
4. What is the statute of limitations for filing a default approval claim? The
brief will argue that the time limit for bringing a claim for default approval of a
subdMsion is the 90 day limitations period of Government Code $ 66499.37, andthat
this statute of limitations begins to run either at the time default approval first occurs, or
, - frorn the date.of the.next ageney action,'which is'inconsistent with the'alleged'default
approval. Applicants may not delay bringrng a claim for default for months or years
while a city, as in this case, continues to spend time, effort and public funds on
processing and eventually approving a revised development plan-
An amicus brief from California cities will substantially bolster the chance for a
favorable ruling from the Court of Appeal which will have far-reaching significance for
all California cities. We think this is a matter of widespread interest to all cities, and that
amicus assistance from cities will be of great help in obtaining a clear recitation from the
Court of Appeal.
Currently respondent Town's brief is due on February 22,2002 and we request
that you obtain any necessary authority and notiff Anne Munsell (paralegal) of my office
Fox g SoHecr, LLP
City Attorney
January 31,2002
Page 5
on or before February 22,2002. A consent form to confirm your authorization is
enclosed for your use. Your city will not be charged in aly way should it choose to
support this effort.
Many thanks for your support and please feel free to telephone me directly at
(310) 444-7805 should you have any questions on this case.
Very truly 1'ours,HSol qi
HAGIMARGARET MOORE SO
of FOX & SOHAGI, LLP
Dwight L. Moore, Town Attorney, Town of Paradise
JoArure Speers, League of California Cities
Rob Ewing, Town Attorney, Town of Danville
league\amiou2.ltr.wpd\?050 1.028
cc
Fox o SoHact, LLP
Authorization to Join Amicus Brief
Oak Creek Estates v. Town of Paradise
Return by mail or facsimile (310) 444'7813
Margaret Moore Sohagi, Esq.
Fox & Sohagi, LLP
10960 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1270
Los Angeles, Californi a 90O24'37 02
Re: Oak Creek Estates v. Town of Paradise
Authorization to Add City of
-
to Amicus Curiae Brief
Dear Ms. Sohagi:
Pursuant to the City's policy regarding joinder in friend-of-the-court briefs, you
are authorizedto add the City of
-
under my name as the City's
attorney to the amicus brief you are preparing in the above-referenced matter.
The City understands that you are preparing this brief on a pro bono basis and
there will be no cost to the City associated with joinder in this brief. Thank you for your
advocacy efforts on behalf of public agencies in this matter.
Very truly Yours,
City Auorney
State Bar Number
Address
,
I
Agenda ltem 8
Meeting Date z o oL
$4,241,223.12
Ck. No. 80499 - 80644
Excludes Library Checks 80499- 80547
RECOMMENDED FOR P T APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for January 2002
$1,568,167.50
Ck. No. 144870 - 145743
.EFTS for January 2002
$397 ,787 .72
-ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
SIFINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
I
t,
02 - 08- 2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
SEI.JER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I.'ATER FUND
SELIER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMENT SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
STATE GRANTS FUND
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS I VE,
THE AMOUNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
lJARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01.02
ll
PAGE 9
FUND AMOUNT
92,521 .78
763,590.99
5,285.55
142,027.39
15,569.43
190,674.78
30,420.84
295.00
11 ,427.08
788.13
2, 070 . 05
187.12
9,917.40
2,052.00
'101
320
326
3?7
525
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
734
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $1 ,266,827.54
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
AND/OR CLATMS NUI{BERED FRoM 81032 THRoUGH 81 135 INCLUSM,ToTALING IN
oF s1,266,827.54, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPRoVED By THE pRopER
AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
I.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. \
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATECOUNCI L
t^
(,,a
NUMBER NAME
81128 KENNETH CARROLL
l',tl SCELLANEOUS
811?9 ANGELA SONG
MI SCELLANEC}I,JS
81 130 J.P. ROTHSCHILD
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81 131 JOSEPH COTCHETT
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81132 THE SULLIVAN CORPORATION
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81 133 PAT LCI.JGHRAN
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81134 D KELLY CONSTRUCTION
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81135 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRI
MISC. SUPPLIES
TOTAL
CITY OF BURLINGAMEL'ARRANT REGISTER
02/08/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand trritten Checks
23463
ACCOUNT
240.00 101 36600
285.00 101 36600
500.00 731 ?2520
448.00 731 22520
400.00 731 22520
2,200.00 731 22520
5,500.00 731 22520
2,662.61 320 79100 120
23464
23465
23466
23467
23468
23469
23471
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
240.00
285 .00
300.00
448 - 00
400.00
2,200.00
5,500 .00
2,652.61
91 ,266,827.54
CITY OF BURLINGAME
t,,ARRANT REGISTER
0?/08/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
,str
ACCOUNT
77.00 101 66100 240
315.00 101 68010 220 1580
?94.00 101 58010 220 1580
677.50 529 68030 120 4400
5,327.00 320 73070 210
59.10 620 15000
96.00 619 64460 210 5180
2,816.00 101 64420 011
300.00 731 22520
623.98 '\ IOl 68010 110 11oO
49.00 101 55200 160
1 5, 1 75.00 320 79400 210
677.28 101 64400 120
1,573.15 621 64450 200
949.75 101 64420 030
320 80480 120
320 80480 220
(r
NUMBER NAI,|E
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
77.00
31 5 .00
294.00
677 -50
5,327.00
59.10
96.00
2,816.00
300 .00
523.98
49.00
15,175.00
6n.28
1 ,573.15
949.75
8111?ENGINEERING NEI.JS RECORD
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
22686
81115 CHRIS MILANO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22769
81114 JAMES YARBOROUGH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22793
81115 MDL PLASTIC BAGS COMPANY
MISC. SUPPLIES
22807
81116 VALI CoOPER AND ASSoCIATES, INC. 22813
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81117 PENINSULA FORD OF SAN BRUNO
SUPPL I ES
22894
81 1 18 I.IESTERN EXTER}I I NATOR COMPANY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23004
81119 MERIT RESOURCE GROUP
TE}IPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC.
23076
81120 23114
811?1 OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE EXPENSE
23153
81122 AT&T ullRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS
23169
ION IAN CONSTRIJCT ION
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
8'I'I?3 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81124 SAN FRANCISCO EXAMINER
14ISC. SUPPLIES
81125 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE
81126 RON LITTLE
MI SCELLANEOUS
811?7 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC.
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23234
?3366
23436
23461
379
,501
44
95
23162
38
38,981.39
la ()Ffr\.
1
NUMBER NAME
81 102 NETL'ORK TELECOMPUTING
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2'.1814
81103 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE WEST, I 218"19
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
81104 MSM INC.
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS
21856
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI'ARRANT REGISTER
02/08/0?
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
?0564
ACCOTJNT
352.00 101 68010 220 1580
265.21 620 15000
304.00 320 80250 220
266.00 10't 68010 220 1580
374.76 101 68010 800 1101
3,421.41 320 80250 ?ZO
81097 JULIO MORAN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81 098 CARTER INDUSTRIES INC.
SUPPL I ES
81099 MICRO h,AREHOUSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81100 JONATHAN TURNER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81101 ALFAX HHoLESALE FURNITURE, INC.
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
81105 BIBB AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81106 EUNICE JEAN I.'ALCHA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81107 VB GOLF LLC
MI SCELLANEOUS
RECREATION PROGRAM EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81108 ROBERTS AND BRUNE
MISC. SUPPLIES
81109 GOLDEN GATE CONSTRUCTION
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81110 B 1 ENTERPRISE CORP.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DES ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
20673
20706
21399
21 505
21863
21933
21948
22178
?2607
22660
13.15
545.50
6,360.84
1,382.50
22,000.00
101 65200 110
101 65400 120
529 36714
529 68030 213
529 68030 220
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
352.00
265.21
304.00
266.00
371.76
3,421.41
5 58.65
96.99
36,302.00
780.00
?9,743.34
261.99
300.00
u,573.71
96.99 101 66210 222
36,302.00 320 80510 210
780.00 101 68010 220 1347
261.99 527 66520 120
300.00 751 2?520
84,573.71 320 80270 220
81111 22675
?,908.91 320 80200 2I0
2,908.9'.1
(r
NUI''IBER NAME
81 082 SAN MATEO RENTALS
RENTS & LEASES
81083 NATURCLEAN
MISC. SUPPLIES
81084 BAY ALARM
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81 085 DENNIS J, AMOROSO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81086 JJR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81087 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY
UNIFORMS AND EAUIPMENT
TRAINING EXPENSE
81088 AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERV.
MISC. SUPPLIES
81089 SIGNET TESTING LABS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81 090 IJILSEY & HAM
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81 091 ERIC GIESEKER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81092 8AY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC
OFFICE EXPENSE
81093 APPLIED I}IDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
EOUIPIIIENT MAINT.
81094 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT
COMIiiUNICATIONS
81095 GE CAPITAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81096 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
02/08/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks
18767
1 8830
ACCOUNT
99.00 101 68020 180 2200
1,984.50 527 66520 120
2,4?5.50 6',t9 64460 210 5110
558,323.87 320 76010 220
5,887.75 3?O 79380 210
526 69020 140
526 69020 260
101 58020 110 2100
101 68010 220 1100
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
99.00
1,984.50
2,425.50
558,323.87
5,887.75
445.77
50.00
3,217 .89
6,005.45
352.00
41.14
56.74
228.36
498.67
18854
18970
18979
18990
19181
19367
19397
19491
19588
19767
19768
?0216
164.81
280.96
398.94
99.73
50.00 520 66700 120
3,217.89 320 76010 210
6,005.45 320 78290 ?10
.\
352.00 101 68010 220 1580
41.14 101 55100 110
56.74 101 58020 200 2200
228.36 101 55200 160
20335
500.00 3?0 75't10 220
500.00
NUMEER NAi4E
41067
81068
81069
81070
81072
81orj
81074
81076
81079
8',I080
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI.'ARRAIIT REGISTER
02/08t02
VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hand Llritten Checks
ACCC[.'NT
5,285.55 326 7i171 210
50.82 620 &700 130
PAGE 4
STETSON ENGINEERS INC. 16131
PROTESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
ACTION SPORTS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
AI,IOUNT
5,285.55
270.00
50.82
317.13
't23.11
155 .88
989.94
300.00
6,523.40
2,301..00
6,607.00
SYDNEY
'{ALKOOstlALL IoOLS
I4UNICIPAL MAINTENANCE
I,i t SC. SUPPL I ES
SUPPL IES
SUPERIOR TRANSI.II SS IONS INC
VEHI CLE MAINT.
I'IETRO I.IO8I LE COI.4MUN I CAT IONS
RADIO MAINT.
COLORPRIIIT DIGITAL
UISC. SUPPLIES
OFF ICE EXPENSE
CAL I FOR}I IA PNEUMATIC TOOL CO
MISC. SUPPLIES
CRANE PEST COI,ITROL
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PE}iI}ISULA CONFLICT
MISCELLANEOUS EXPEIISE
16167
16317
16629
$472
17344
1744?
17197
17732
17741
18103
18546
18633
266.17
50.96
527 6r.520 120
620 15000
123.14 525 69020 260
155.88 101 65200 202
208.17 10'l 65200 205
746.38
213.56
526 69020 120
619 64460 't't0
al077 DUKE'S SALES & SERVICE, Iilc
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
81078
300.00 731 22520
125.57 526 69020 120
6,523.40 527 66520 210
201.25 619 64460 210 5110
2,301.00 101 64420 210
5,607.00 101 64560 290
81081 LABOR READY, ITIC.
TEHPORARY EMPLOYI4EIlI SVC.
14659
406.80 526 69020 011
406-80
81075 CRAIG COCCELLATO
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
?70.00 101 58010 220 1581
208,17
125.57
201 .25
81071 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
TRAINI}IG EXPEiJSE
18082
(a
NUMBER NAME
81058 PIP PRINTING
MISC. SUPPLIES
TRAINING EXPENSE
81 059
CITY OF BURLINGAME
UI ARRANT REGISTER
02/08/02
VENDORr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
DETA I L ACCOUNT
101 64400 120
101 55300 260
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
467.80
295 - 00
?,157.75
855.00
6,123.71
98- 5'l
432.69
116.26
351.54
19.46
1,01 1 .13
8.66
189.01
93.83
165.00
5't5.50
155.16
IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYING, INC.
CLAIMS PAY}.IENTS
1 0620
11352
11568
'11773
13720
14855
1 5095
1 5250
65150
55100
65100
65150
65100
110
120
140
160
190
295.00 618 64520 601
81 060 CHIEF BILL REILLY
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAINING EXPENSE
VEHICLE MAINT.
81061 COI,IMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81 062
101
101
101
101
101
10'l
101
625
65200
65200
65200
65200
65200
65200
65200
65213
110
120
130
't40
?03
240
260
202
855.00
669.07
650.29
1 0.78
54.57
714.44
736.32
24
00
00
00
50
25
45
40
40
167.
198.
575.
90.
351 .
500.
799.
437.
169.,
619 64460 ?10 5150
CHIEF GARY t.'. MISSEL
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
EOUIPII{ENT MAINT.
GAS, otL & GREASE
VEHICLE MAINT.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAINING EXPENSE
PRISONER EXPENSE
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE
M I SCELLANEOUS
M I SCELLANEOUS
55150 200
65100 201
55100 202
65100 240
65100 250
65100 250
65100 291
65100 ?92
65400 703
22574
101
101
101
101
101
101
" 101\ 101
101
101
101
101
101
101
731
81063 ROYAL IIHOLESALE ELECTRIC
UISC. SUPPLIES
81064 PINPOINT
TRAINING EXPENSE
81065 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81065 HITECH SYSTEMS, INC.
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
98.51 619 &460 120 5150
432.69 526 69020 260
502.00 101 64420 210
1571?
2,052.00 Ti4 65195 8oO
2,052.00
302 .00
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAMEHARRANT REGISTER
02/08/02
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand t"lritten Checks
02819
ACCOUNT
1,536.00 101 65300 011
81044 MANPOI.JER
TEIiIPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC.
81 045 US FILTER
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
MI SCELLANEOTJS
MISC. SUPPLIES
81 046 NATIONIIIDE I.JIRE & BRUSH MFG.
EQUIPMENT I'IAINT.
81047 P. c. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
81 048 SANDRA POEE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81 049 PUTNAM BUICK PONTIAC GMC
VEHICLE MAINT.
81 050 CITY OF SAN MATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81051 SEAUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
MI SCELLANECXJS
81052 ALLSTAR FIRE EOUIPMENT, INC.
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT
CAPITAT EOUIPMENT
81 053 I,JEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR
MISC. SUPPLIES
81 054 JULIE COHN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81 055 SAFETY KLEEN CORP.
l,i|ISC. SUPPLIES
81056 SAN I'IATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC.
PRISONER EXPENSE
81057 3TEOUIPMENTCO.
MISC. SUPPLIES
1 04.30
8,494.19
578.16
278-57
101 66240 120
526 69020 120
526 69020 233
527 66520 1?0
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
1 , 536. 00
9,455.32
72.53
19,894.U
564.00
31.96
5,000.00
1 36.00
?7 ,013.79
I 05 .02
522.00
1 93.50
3,660.00
02880
03002
03054
03175
03206
03366
03536
03938
03964
09122
091 68
09433
72.53 101 66210 200
19,894.84 101 66240 170
564.00 101 68010 220 1340
31.96 625 65213 202
6,000.00 101 65200 220
136.00 526 690?0 233
7,052.49 '\ 101 65200 1409,961.30 101 65200 800
105.02 101 64350 120
522.00 101 68010 220 1344
195.50 620 66700 120
3,660.00 101 65100 291
a
10077 81.26 527 56520 120
81.26
NUMBER NAME
81 032
81033 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO.
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
81 034 EDWARD R. BACoN C0., INC.
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
SUPPL I ES
81035 BRENTON SAFETY, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
81036 BURLINGA}4E CHAMBER OF COI'IT,IERCE
CHA},IBER OF CO}{MERCE PMT.
81037 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT.
RECREATION EXPENSES
81038 GCS WESTERN POI,,IER &
SUPPL I ES
81039 L. N. CURTIS & SoNS
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT
81 040 US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
BLDG. & GROIJNDS MAINT.
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
81041 t,l.t.,. GRAINGER, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
EOUIPT,IENT MAINT.
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
81042 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE
K & I"' DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.IARRANT REGISTER
02/08/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand llritten Checks
01 030
549.03
7,199.92
213.04
283.86
01059
01 182
3,402.00
78.37
01 400
63.22 101 68020 190 2200
526 69020 800
620 15000
263.47 527 66520 1?0
2,301.67 101 64530 151
378.00 101 10700
40.17 620 15000
305.47 101 65200 140
ACCOUNT
101 65400 200
619 64460 220 5110
621 64450 110
6?1 64450 190
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
8,045.85
63-22
3,480.37
?63.47
2,301 .67
378.00
40 -17
305.47
323,042.41
1,573.29
236.58
01637
01663
01 857
02027
02110
02248
02251
142,027.39
7,561 .80
6,934.38
166,130.00
388.84
79480
56530
66530
65530
65530
327
527
527
527
527
210
190
210
220
800
22
T3
34
387
678
307
101 68020 120 2200
526 69020 200
619 64460 120 5150
236.58 101 66210 226
81 043 02645 725.04 101 66240 120
725.04
ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
EOUIPMENT },IAINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
OFFICE EXPENSE
BLDG. & GROUNDS }IAINT.
GEI']ERAL FUIID
CAPITAL II,4PROVEMENTS FUND
UATER FUND
SEI.IER FUND
SOLID I,'ASTE FUXD
GOLT CENTER FUIID
SELT INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUI Pi{ENT SERVI CES TUND
INFORMATION SERVI CES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
STATE GRANTS FUNO
BURL I NGAI,IE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
02-01-2002
NAI,4E
THI S IS TO
TNCLUSIVE,
TIIE AMOU}IT
OFFI CIALS,
ACCORDAIICE
RESPECTTULLY SUBI,{ITTED,
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.4Et,IARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - O'I-02
FUND
101
320
526
527
528
5?9
618
619
621
731
734
736
896
AI'IOUNT
81,210.64
173,258.26
128.186,99
11.165.531,5 ,05
't ,610,68
14,086.53
638,34
1 ,135,23
3,764.02
140,816.67
13,196.14
49- 38
I ,985.85
$609,500.31TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORAELE MAYOR AND CIIY COUICIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII4S LISTED ON PAGES I.IU'{BERED FROI.| 1 THROUGH 9
AIID/OR CLAII.IS NUIiIBERED FRO}I 80928 TIIROUGH 8103I II,ICLUSIVE,TOTALIIIG IN
0F $509,500,3'1, HAVE BEEN CHECKED tN OETATL ANO APPROVED 8y TltE pROpER
AND IN t.{Y OPINION REPRESENT TAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAI}IST TIIE CITY IN
IJITII THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNIS AS INDTCATED THEREON. \
FINA},ICE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATE
ccr..rNc I L DATE
PAGE 9
CIIY OF BURLINGAI'IEs,ARRANT REGISTER
02/01/02
VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
571 .01
300- 00
67.50
325.00
38.52
450.00
273.00
600.00
61.94
$609,500.31
NUI.{BER NAI.IE
81021
81022
81023
41024
81025
81027
81028
81029
81030
81031
TOTAL
HOME DEPOT
MISC. SUPPLIES
SI4ALL TOOLS
OATASATE
OFFICE EXPENSE
JOIIN VERBESTEL
DEPOSIT REFU}JDS
JENNI FER PFAIINER
COiITRACTUAL SERVI CES
BERN ICE LANE
MI SCELLANEOUS
JOE EORG
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
CAL I TORN IA EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS
I.I I SCELLAi]EOUS
MARK PACE
COMiIIJN I CAT I ON S
SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES
DUES & SUESCRIPTIOiIS
RITZ CAII1ERA
OFFICE EXPENSE
73.13
197,61
619 64160 120
619 61160 130
?3384
23410
23451
2315?
23453
23151
23155
23156
?3457
23159
374.60 101 54200 110
300.00 731 22120
67.50 101 68010 220 1460
525.00 101 37010
38.52 101 31510
450.00 320 7A290 220
273,00 618 61520 234
600.00 101 65150 160
82.00 101 64250 240
61.94 101 61350 110
81026 CESARE LANDSCAPING
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
371,60
82.0023458
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE!/ARRA}iT REGISTER
02to1t02
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks
PAGE 7
AI'IOIJN T
11,658.77
955.07
175.00
475,00
190.00
225.00
'1 ,250.00
787 .81
644.00
641-OO
245.75
59,375.00
29,700.69
3,000.00
68.81
8'1005
81005
8't007
81010
81011
81012
81015
81011
81015
81015
81017
81018
81019
11,658.77 101 64350 210
JONES AND MAYER
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S
PITNEY BOI,JES
OFFI CE EXPEI,ISE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
STEVE EHLERS
TRAINING EXPENSE
TLC ADMINISTRATORS
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
IIIAZE & ASSOCIATES
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
J0 Ail|i CooPER
COIITRACTUAL SERVI CES
JO}IN XIELY
TRAI NI NG EXPENSE
CIIARLES SIERRA
TRAINIT'IG EXPENSE
SAFETY SIGN COI'IPANY
TRAF FIC CONTROL UATERIALS
sCAPES, lNC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
HARRIS DESIGN
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
I{I SCELLAIIEOUS
POOL PRODUCTS COMPANY
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
2?818
22921
23014
25059
23138
23156
23178
?3201
23219
23305
23326
23367
23374
153.07
802.00
101 65100 110
101 65100 220
175,00 101 55200 260
475.00 101 65200 260
'190.00 526 69020 190
225.00 101 61120 210
1,250.00 101 64250 210
787.81 101 64250 220
644.00 101 65100 260
644.00 101 65100 260
245.75 101 66210 222
59,375.00 320 80190 220
?9,700.69 520 75110 210
3,000.00 618 54520 038
68.84 525 69020 120
81020 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
COII]RACTUAL SERVICES
23382
2,948.00 320 80470 220
2,948.00
NUI4BER NAI4E ACCOUNT
81008 TIM LOUIS
TRAINITIG EXPENSE
81009 IIIE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP
8LDG. & GROIJNDS I4AINT.
23250
23329
CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E
I,IARRANT REGISTER
02tol102
VENOOR DETAI L
'*' oenotes Hand Hritten Checks
PAGE 6
JONATHAN TURNER
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
THE BANK OF NEg YORK
I.I I SCELLANEOJS
PORTOSAN
IIlI SC. SUPPLIES
CINGULAR 9IRELESS
COi.II4UN I CAT I ON S
V8 GOLF LLC
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
DGBA AND ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALTZED S
80997 OFF I CER ROEERT BOLL
TRAINING EXPENSE
I,IUMBER IIAME
80989
80990
B0992
80991
80995
80996
80998
80999
81000
81001
8',I002
81003
21399
21439
21584
21656
21747
21948
??023
2213A
22212
22324
22621
2?769
133.00 101 58010 220 1580
1,500.00 101 32100
$6.34 101 65100 250
175.07 529 68030 120 4100
117.97 't0'1 65200 130
404.95 10'1 66100 160
1,435.51 529 6a030 220
7,778.60 320 79400 210
1,272.76 101 65100 260
29.17 -\ 896 20281
6,190,00 f31 22560
526,99 528 66500 210
5,000.00 10'1 15500
168.00 101 68010 220 1580
180,00 '101 55100 250
AI'{OUNT
133.00
1.500.00
636.38
175.07
147.97
401.95
7 ,7t8.60
1,272.76
29.17
6,190.00
526,99
5,000.00
168.00
180.00
AT&T
UTILITY EXPENSE
J. J.R. CONSTRUCTION
MI SCELLANEOUS
THERMO GAS TECH
PROEESSI OTIAL & SPECIALIZED S
PITIIEY 8O}'ES RESERVE ACCCN.'NT
MI SCELLAIIEOUS
CHRIS MI LANO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CEI'IIRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY OI 22792
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
81004 JAMES YARBOROUGH
CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES
22793
168.00 101 58010 220 1580
168.00
21740
21997
ACCoutiT
1 ,135.61
80991 OFTICER DALE IJI LD
TRAINI NG EXPENSE
80993 FASTENALCOMPAIIY
SMALL TOOLS
CI TY OF EURLINGAI.4E
[/ARRANT REGISTER
02tol/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*t Dehotes Hand L/ritten Checks
IIUMSER NA}IE
80975 IfiAGEttAX, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80976
80978
ACCOJNT
16,045,26 '101 65300 220
PRIORlTY 1
Il I SCELLANEOUS
SUPPLIES
80977 L'IIIGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNI}IG
}II SCELLANEOUS
640.56
234.91
't01 65100 703
620 15000
19115
19?39
19471
19491
20060
20301
20346
?0564
20706
20724
20918
21171
PAGE 5
A oUNT
16,015.26
875.17
375.00
66.00
3,755.00
943.27
130.00
176.00
3,327.00
1,956.68
33,171.03
679.87
263,54
ERIC GIESEKER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
375.00 731 22525
66.00 101 68010 220 1580
80979
80980
80981
80982
80983
80981
80985
80986
80987
PEiIIi{SULA CORRIOOR JOINT
REiITS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
REN]S & LEASES
AT&T UIRELESS
co,$,tuN I cAT t 0N sco UN I CAT I oil S
PENINSULA HOSPITAL
t.I I SCELLANEOUS
JULIO T1ORAN
CON]RACTUAL SERVICES
I'I I CRO IJAREHOUSE
CAPITAL EOUIPI,IENT
CITY IIALL MAINTENAIICE
MI SCELLANEOUS
893
1 ,471 .00
385.00
1 ,471,00
'101 55210 180
526 69020 180
527 6520 180
89
38
130.00 614 61520 Zr4
176.00 101 68010 220 1580
101 68010 800 1100
621 64450 200
731 22531
SPR INT PCS
UIILITY EXPEI,ISE
HARDISON KOI'IATSU MLICH &
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
OUICK I.IIX CONCRETE
SIDE!]ALK REPAIR EXPEI{SE
GEORGE BAGDOII
I,4ISCELLANEOUS
33,471.03 320 76010 210
679.87 101 66210 219
263.54 101 66210 031
80988 VANGUARD CONSTRUCTIOIl
CLAIMS PAY}IENTS
21354 I,291.65 618 64520 601
9,291 .65
21110
1 ,251 ,6
1 ,251.67
1 ,251 .67
101 65200 160
736 61571 160
1,956.68 896 20281
I
NUMBER NAME
80961 HITECH SYSTEMS, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
COMMUN I CAT IONS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
MISC. SUPPLIES
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
8096E DISCOIJNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
1.,!ISC. SUPPLIES
80963 MUNICIPAL I4AINTENANCE
SUPPL I ES
80954 STANDARD REGISTER
OFFICE EXPENSE
80965 COLORPRINT DIGITAL
MISC. SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPENSE
80955 COLUMBIA CASCADE COMPANY
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
80967 BRUCE BARRON
TRAINING EXPENSE
80968 SIERRA MORENO MERCANTILE CO.
SMALL TOOLS
80969 LABOR READY, INC.
TE}IPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC
80970 BAI LEY I S
SMALL TOOLS
80971 PEGGY GUARALDI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80972 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8O97J ANG NEI.'SPAPERS
PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING
80974 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
EOUIPTIENT I,IAINT.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
I'JARRANT REGISTER
02/01/02
VENDOR DETAILr*t Denotes Hand l,rritten Checks
15712
16460
ACCOUNT
473.77 101 68010 120 '.t230
50.96 620 15000
1 ,967.37 101 &250 1'.t0
101
101
'101
734
734
673.69
750 .00
1,044.00
?76.75
13,319.39
101 64100 120
5?6 69020 110
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
1 6,063 .83
473-77
50.96
1 ,967.37
297.54
140.25
/r75 .00
77.38
1,356.00
251 -58
99.75
58.85
450.52
65150
65150
65100
65'.t95
65195
120
160
220
120
800
16629
't7495
17497
17789
18131
18357
18559
18733
19044
't9047
1 9083
1 99.80
97.74
110.?5 101 68020 '.t90 2200
475.00 101 65200 260
77.38 101 58020 130 2300
1,356.00 526 69020 011
?61.58 101 68020 130 2300
99.75 101 68010 ZZ0 1461
58.85 320 78260 220
450,52 101 64200 150
19131 518.93 101 65200 200
5 18.93
,
NUMBER NAME
80949 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
COMMUNICATIONS
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
M I SCEL LANEOUS
80950 B.E.I, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
80951 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS
1-llSC. SUPPLIES
80952 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80953 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80954 ABAG . LIABILITY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CLAIMS PAY}.IENTS
MI SCELLANEOUS
80955 oLE ' S
SUPPL I ES
80956 TAB PRODUCTS CO.
OFFICE EXPENSE
80957 SEOUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL
OFFICE EXPENSE
80958 SGT. ED NAKISO
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
80959 ELECTRO PLAX COMPANY
MISC. SUPPLIES
SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
TRAINING EXPENSE
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.JARRANT REGISTER
02/al /02
VENDOR DETAILr*I Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
0391 0
137.41
179.53
6.99
20.40
174.'.tz
989.00
90.14
1,254.00
14.97
09072
09143
42.76 619 64460 120 5?20
226.57 5?6 69020 '.t20
4,397.?5 320 80232 ??0
2,936.49 320 71171 210
618 64520 210
618 64520 601
618 64520 604
371.98 620 15000
98.78 101 64250 110
805.87 621 64450 110
372.00 10't 65100 250
21.60 101 58020 120 2100
09?70
09461
09518
09626
09577
09720
09770
1 0049
612.50
724.38
55 .00
ACCOUNT
'101 58010
101 58010
101 68020
101 68010
101 68010
101 68010
101 68020
101 58020
731 22545
110
120
130
150
190
2?0
240
250
1 100
1 100
2200
1 100
1 100
1z',t2
2300
21 00
PAGE 3
AI,IOUNT
3,166.56
42.76
226.57
4,397.25
2,936.49
1,391 .88
371.98
98.78
805.87
372.00
21.60
80950 15129 388.00 101 65100 260
388.00
NUMBER NAME
80942 INFORI'IATION SERVICES DEPT.
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
80943 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION &
MI SCELLANEOUS
80944 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS
80945 SEOUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
MISC. SUPPLIES
80946 SKYLINE SUPPLY C0., INC.
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPENSE
80947 sllAP 0N T00Ls
SI,IALL TOOLS
80948 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY OF BURLINGAMEIIARRANT REGISTER
02/01 /0?
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand Written Checks
ACCOUNT
1,333.00 101 65150 220
131,810.70 731 ?2587
39,087.00 527 66530 270
213.00 527 66520 120
03378
03431
03483
03536
03574
03587
03760
1 ,189.?9
129.80
128.17
47.63
1,064.52
64420 110
662',t0 120
65210 222
59020 110
69020 1?0
69020 290
66520 110
66520 120
66700 120
64450 110
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
1 ,335 . 00
131,810.70
39,087. 00
21 3.00
4,292.44
4?9.75
8,643.36
154.15
693.90
388.50
5',1 .14
445.24
101
101
101
526
526
526
527
527
620
62'.1
429.75 620 65700 130
8,643.36 '\1Ol 68020 220 23oO
NUMEER NAME
80928 * STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MI SCELLANEOUS
M I SCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
M I SCEL LANEOUS
80929 G. BoRToLoTTo & C0., INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80930 CITY OF BURLINGAME
MI SCELLANEOUS
80931 CITY OF BURLINGAME
MISC. SUPPLIES
MI SCELLANEOUS
80932 CRAFT PRINTERS
OFFICE EXPENSE
80933 CoMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC.,
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE
80934 DULIN ADVERTISING INC.
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
80935 u.tJ. cRAINGER, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
80936 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
SIDELJALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE
80937 HAINES & CoMPANY, INC.
EOUIPMENT I-IAINT.
80938 HARDING ESE, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80939 MANPOIJER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80940 KPMG LLP
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT.
WATER PURCHASES
CITY OF BURLINGAME
LlARRANT REGISTER
02/01/02
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand Llritten Checks
23460
531.54
81.77
40.45
6.92
01358
01551
01624
01842
01987
02036
02248
02261
02326
02365
02819
031 09
2,220.00
655 .00
32,',t52.34 320 80?32 220
80.00 101 32100
101 68010 '.t20 1321
731 22533
237 .6',1 101 65't00 1 10
1,508.63 621 64450 200
455.00 101 64420 150
17.62 619 64460 120 5150
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
1,142.52 101 65150 200
4,059.06 528 66600 210
537.60 101 65300 210
6,000.00 101 64560 210
ACCOUNT
101 64250 010
526 69020 010
527 6r'520 010
619 64460 010
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
660.68
32,152.34
80.00
2,875.00
237.61
1,508.63
455 .00
17.62
380.96
1,142.52
4,059.06
537.60
6,000.00
50.68
320.28
80941 03353
124,180.76 526 69020 171
'124,180.75
01-25-2002
NAME
GENERAL FU}ID
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
I.'ATER FUND
SEI.'ER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPI,IENT SERVICES FUND
INFOR!.IATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
CITY OF BURLINGAME
hJARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01.02
PAGE 10
AMOUNTFUND
101
320
526
527
5?9
618
619
620
621
625
731
895
1 08,545.1 5
995,067.57
33,386.4'.1
'l ,355.11
7,805.45
1 1,010.83
2,305.52
4,542.44
?1 ,117.00
428.42
85 ,574.11
44,994.45
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS I VE ,
THE AMOUNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $1 ,316,133.57
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THRCIJGH 10
AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 80802 THROUGH 80927 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
0F $1,316,133.57, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPRoVED By THE pRopER
AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
t.,ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNC I L DATE
NUMBER NAME
80913 SAN FRANCISCO EXAMINER
MISC. SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80914 ANCHOR DETAILING
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
8091 5 MARK PERUZZARO
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
8091 5 BERNIE HEAD
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
80917 BOB LIEDTKE
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
8091 B TOM HEALLY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80919 DAVID STEINBERGER
M I SCELLANEOUS
80920 J.D. CESARE
MI SCELLANEOUS
80921 BURLINGAME AVENUE ASSOC
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
8092? TAMMY MAK
TRAINING EXPENSE
80923 AASHTO
OFFICE EXPENSE
809?4 DISCOUNT SIGNS AND NEON
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80925
CITY OF BURLINGAME!,ARRANT REGISTER
01 t25/0?
VENDOR DETAILr*t Denotes Hand LJritten Checks
23366
115.76
7,580.74
23368
ACCOUNT
101 58010 120 1348
101 68010 220 1100
653.50 101 65200 203
300.00 731 22520
1,320.00 731 22520
1,300.00 73't ?2520
600.00 101 68010 220 1581
325.00 101 57010
80.00 101 36310
16,000.00 731 22520
595.90 101 64250 260
58.25 101 56100 110
8,000,00 320 80470 220
5,280.00 320 80570 210
1,660.00 3?0 75110 120
CULVER GROUP
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23438
?3439
23440
23441
23442
23113
23444
?3445
23446
23447
23448
23449
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
7,696.50
655 .50
300.00
1 ,320 . 0o
1 ,300.00
600 - 00
325 .00
80.00
16,000.00
595.90
58.25
8,000.00
6,280.00
1 ,660 . oo
992-00
80926 CREATIVE IRON
}IISC. SUPPLIES
80927 ZEIGER ENGINEERS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL
23450 992.00 529 68030 220
$'l ,316,133.57
la
CITY OT EURLINGAI4EI.'ARRA}JT RE6ISTER
01t25 t02
VENDOR OETAIL
'*r Denotes Hard l.lritten Checks
PAGE 8
AMOUI]T
520.00
750.00
350.00
294.00
182.00
267.63
23.41
96.00
865.50
18,822.28
'l ,364.00
548.00
189 - 61
1 ,067.69
700.00
NUMBER NAME
80908
80910
8091 1
80897 sAN itATEo REGIOIIAL NETI,ORK, INC. 22759
UTILITY EXPENSE
80898 CHRIS I'II LANO
CON]RACTUAL SERVICES
22769
80899 JONATHAII SAKII
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22770
8O9OO I.IINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
EOUIPMENI t.IAI NT.
22803
80901 vALL0l4BR0SA
TRAINI}IG EXPENSE
22877
80902 PE}IINSULA UNI FORi.I & EOUIPI'IENT
UI,I I FORIIS A}ID EOUIPI'IENT
22499
80903 TRANSCO , USA
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
23002
80904
ACCOUNT
520.00 896 20281
750.00 101 68010 220 1581
294.00 101 65200 200
182.00 101 64420 262
23.41 625 65213 ZO3
96.00 619 64460 210 5180
863.50 518 61520 210
18,822.28 \:20 76010 210
1,364,00 101 54420 011
548,00 621 64450 110
189.61 526 69020 210
1,067.69 101 6t1250 220
700.00 101 65500 260
23004
80905 ROPERS,MAJESKI,KOHN & BENTLEY
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
23019
80906 cRITTCAL SoLUT IoNS, rNC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
25035
IIESTERN EXTERMI NATOR COMPANY
PROTESS IOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
80907 iIERII RESqJRCE GROUP
TEI.IPORARY E}IPLOYI.IENT SVC.
PI T}IEY BOI'ES
OFTICE EXPEXSE
80909 TIIE I.IOBILE STORAGE GROUP
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
23076
23124
23138
23204JO AN}I C@PER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CALI FORNIA SPECIALIZED TRAINING 23220
TRAINIIiG EXPENSE
80912 DIRECTV
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
23253 48.98 526 69020 120
48.98
350.00 101 68010 220 1581
267.63 101 65400 140
CI TY Of BURLINGAT1E
IIARRA}IT REGISTER
01/25 /02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
PAGE 7
AI.iOUNT
12,A05.19
84,87
48,339,00
12,095.00
80.00
6,106,66
65.00
63.01
t t5.83
706.13
1,532.00
5,300.00
40.00
13,080.00
1,353.50
NUI{8ER NAI.4E
80881
80882
80884
80885
80886
80887
80889
80890
8089',|
80892
80893
80894
80895
SAN MATEO COUIITY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897
t'I I SCELLANEOUS
PROVIDENCE PEST TERMITE
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S
L'ILBUR St4l T[ ASSoCIATES 21769
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE I/EST, I 2'1819
OFF I CE EXPENSE
ACCOUNT
12,805.49 320 80/180 210
48,339.00 320 80510 210
80.00 619 64460 210 5170
5,085.16
1,32',|.50
529 36717
529 68030 213
6s.00 731 22531
63.01 896 20281
155.85 527 66520 120
706.43 101 65100 048
1,632.00 101 67500 12s
s.300.00 731 22520
40-00 620 15000
'13,080.00 526 69020 210
1,353.50 101 65200 203
21863
22133
2213a
22178
22375
22501
22694
VB GOLT LLC
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
RECREAT I ON PROGRAI4 EXPENSE
CALTAC
LIBRARY EXPENSES
ROBERIS AIID BRUNE
MISC. SUPPL IES
OONALD SHEPLEY
iII SCELLANEOUS
EXPRESS TOI/ING
SUPPLIES
GH I RARDELL I ASSOCIATES
PROFESS IOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
FAI LSAFE TESTING
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
CALIFORNIA STA]E BOARD OF EOUALI 22424
LIERARY-.RECORDS AND CASSETT
HE LI.I I G CONSTRUCTION
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
80896 MELISSA DATA CORP
OFFICE EXPENSE
22699
771.55 101 6/1250 110
771 .55
81,87 tot 65200 110
80883 Bt88 A[0 ASSoCTA]ES, INC,
PROTESSIOI'IAL & SPECIALI ZED S
12,095.00 101 57010
21947
80888 AT&T
UTILITY EXPENSE
21948
22633
2?676
'{*'
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAMEUARRANT REGISTER
01/?5/O?
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
19131
ACCOUNT
450.00 619 64460 210 5200
773.63 620 15000
47.63 101 64350 120
101 58010 120
101 65200 800
320 80420 200
320 80250 220
1,539.19 101 64420 800
300.00 731 22525
235.36 101 66210 ?19
1,479.57 520 15000
475.00'\.101 68010 220 1581
1,125.00 101 68010 220 1581
350.00 620 15000
80867 BAKER'S CHEM.DRY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80868 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC.
SUPPL I ES
80869 I,IEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER
MISC. SUPPLIES
80870 M I CRO IIAREHOUSE
MISC, SUPPLIES
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
EOUIPMENT MAINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80871 DELL MARKETING L.P.
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
80872 GUMBINGER ASSOCIATES, INC.
MI SCELLANEOUS
808rJ OUICK MIX CONCRETE
SIDEL'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
80874 REDI.IOOD GENERAL TIRE
SUPPL I ES
80875 ROY SCOTT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80876 FRANK WEBER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80877 P&STolllTNG
SUPPL I ES
80878 ARAMARK UNIFORM
UNIFORMS AND
UNIFORMS AND
UNIFORMS AND
UNIFORMS AND
UNIFORMS AND
20464
?0531
20706
20900
20936
z'.t140
21?16
21233
?1344
2154?
I NC.?',t634
?1740
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
460.00
773-63
47.63
1,282.77
1 ,539.19
300.00
236.36
1 ,479.57
475.00
1,125.00
350.00
1,578.22
159.25
514
304
?04
?60
00
77
00
00
SERVI CES,
EOU I PMENT
EOUI PI.IENT
EOU I PMENT
EOU I PMENT
EOU I PMENT
439.37
559.32
391.43
1 07.90
80.20
80879 FASTENAL COMPANY
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
80880 TURBo DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
MI SCELLANEOUS
159.26 101 65200 203
21767
5,854.19 101 37010
5,854.19
101 66210 140
526 69020 140
527 56520 140
619 64460 140
520 66700 140
CIIY OF BURLINGAME
!]ARRANT REGISTER
01/25 tO2
VENDOR DETATL
'*r Denotes Hand Yritten Checks
PAGE 5
AII{OUNT
856.80
2,410.0O
2,234.92
143.76
2,571.08
534 -22
I ,212.50
1 ,508,49
84.08
3a3.24
12.86
280.00
891 ,720.30
600.00
NUI,IEER NAI'IE
80852
80853
80854
80855
80856
80857
80858
80859
80860
8086'l
80862
80853
80864
80865
BRINKIS INC.
BANKING SERVICE FEES
OFFICE EXPENSE
ACTION SPORTS
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
SUPERIOR ALUI.|INUM BODY CORP.
MI SCELLANEOUS
SUPPLIES
DOUBLETREE HOTEL
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
CUMMINS I.'EST, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
STEVEIS CHRI STMAS TREES
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
BROADIIAY BUSII{ESS
MI SCELLANEOUS
STATE OF CAL I TORN IA
SUPPLIES
METRO MOBI LE COMi4UNICATIONS
RADIO MAINT.
COLORPRINT D IGITAL
OFFICE EXPE},ISE
LES VOGEL DODGE
SUPPLIES
AMERICAN IIATER IIORKS ASSN.
It{ISCELLAIIEOUS EXPENSE
DEIINI S J. AI'IOROSO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
LIEBERT CASS IDY I,JHITIIORE
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
ACCOUNT
450.00
406.80
101 &250 120
529 68030 110 1200
2,410.00 tot 58010 220 1581
944.50
290.42
618 61520 604
620 15000
143.76 101 64350 210
2,571.08 101 65100 220
558.22 526 22501
1,21?.50 731 22555
1,508.49 620 15000
84.08 101 65200 205
383.24 526 69020 110
12. 620 15000
280.00 526 69020 290
891,720.30 320 76010 220
600.00 101 64550 210
15813
16247
16414
16767
16449
16919
1740?
17497
18478
18951
18970
19095
80866 IMAGET{AX, INC.
14ISCELLANEOUS
19145
247 .50 nl ?2518
247 .50
CITY OF BURLINGAMEt.,ARRANT REGISTER
01 /2r/0?
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
09493
ACCOUNT
857.35 101 66100 210
204.80 618 64520 ?10
80837 ocE'-BRUNING, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80838 ABAG - LIABILITY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80839 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDI.JARE
I.{ I SC. SUPPL I ES
SMALL TOOLS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
80840 3TEOUIPMENTCO.
1'IISC. SUPPLIES
80841 DARYL D. JoNES, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80842 IDEAL RESTORATTVE DRytNG, INC.
CLAIMS PAYMENTS
80843 LEE STAMBOLIS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80844 COMI!{AIR MECHANICAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80845 coAsT otL c0.
GAS, OIL & GREASE
80845 AT&T
UTILITY EXPENSE
80847 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHINES
EOUIPMENT MAINT.
80848 ROYAL I.IHOLESALE ELECTRIC
l,,llSC. SUPPLIES
80849 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80850 ALFRED H. ESCOFFIER
MI SCELLANEOUS
HITECH SYSTEMS, INC.
EOUIPI,4ENT MAINT.
NUMBER NAME
101 65200 120
101 55200 130
101 65200 203
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
857.35
204.80
258.50
5?7.03
?25.00
7,998.03
725.00
1 , 006.95
7,741 .55
184-48
2,850.00
77.53
56. 00
1 ,235 .00
09518
09670
10077
10101
11352
11361
11773
13818
13940
14252
1 4855
1 5250
15413
90.35
1 59.90
8.25
527.03 527 66520 120
225.00 10't 65200 220
7,998.03 618 64520 601
7?5.00 101 68010 220 1581
1,006.95 619 64450 210 5120
7,741 .55 . 101 65100 201
184.48 896 20281
2,850.00 10't 58010 200 1100
77.53 619 64460 120 5120
66.00 101 61420 210
1,235.00 101 67500 031
80851 't5712
1,088.31 101 65150 200
I ,088.31
NUMBER NAME
80825 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAINING EXPENSE
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
M I SCELLANEOUS
80826 ALLSTAR FIRE EOUIPI,IIENT, INC
UN I FORIiIS AND EOU I PMENT
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
80827 LIEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR.
OFFICE EXPENSE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80828 STATE OF CAICONSERVATION DEPT
M I SCEL LANEOUS
80829 HoRIZoN
MISC. SUPPLIES
80830 c0t T/0 | CoNNoR
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE
80831 SAFETY KLEEN CORP.
cAs, otL & GREASE
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
80832 RO OFFICE SOLUTIONS
OFFICE EXPENSE
80833 CITY OF }4ILLBRAE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80834 ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATIONS,INC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80835 LIFE ASSIST
SUPPL I ES
80836 STERICYCLE, INC.
SUPPL I ES
CITY OF BURLINGA}.IEI.JARRANT REGISTER
01 /25/0?
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand t",ritten Checks
0391 0
203.27
2, 030.85
03938
03964
09073
101 65200 140
101 65200 800
101 65100 110
101 64350 210
2,033.34 73'.t 2?550
61.62 101 68020 1?0 2200
210.00 '\621 64450 zo}
ACCOUNT
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
5 ,230.71
14,466.83
6n.66
2,033.34
61.62
21 0.00
427.90
16.86
17 ,754.00
528.00
47 -27
5.67
111.88
't24.00
2,339.00
135.00
45 .00
133.25
50.79
52.00
101 68010
101 68010
101 68020
101 68020
101 64420
101 68010
'101 68010
101 68020
101 68020
101 68010
731 22534
110 1100
120 1587
130 2200
140 2200
210
220 1347
240 1100
250 2200
260 2100
800 't 100
1
13
414.56
052.27
52
11
452
225
09130
09132
091 68
09213
09234
09338
09392
314.90
1 13.00
101 65200 201
625 65213 203
16.86 101 66210 110
17,754.00 101 65200 220
528.00 101 68010 220 1212
47.27 101 65200 112
09439 52.95 101 65200 112
52.95
CITY OF EURLINGAI.4EHARRANT REGISTER
01/25 /02
VE}.IOOR DETAILr*r oenotes Hand !ritten Checks
IIUMBER NAI4E
80814 !/. !1. GRAINGER, INC.
TRAIN I NG EXPENSE
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
80815
80818
80819
ACCOUNT
116,53 101 66210 226
6,976.50 320 76010 Zl0
259.88 101 66210 120
72,53 101 66210 200
0?218
02?61
02365
02645
03054
03179
03471
0353'l
03587
03821
18,076.57
10.23
40,911 .51
526 69020 170
527 66520 170
896 20280
PAGE 2
AMOUI]T
478.71
6,976.50
259.88
72.53
58,998.11
?2,aag.50
830.68
115.78
125.00
230.47
248.21
526 69020 260
619 64460 120 5120
GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPEI'ISE
80817 K & I.I DISCOI]NT LIGIITING & SUPP
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
NATIONIJIDE I./IRE & BRUSH MFG.
EOUI PMENT MAINT.
P. U. d !.
GAS & ELECTRIC
GAS & ELECTRIC
UTILITY EXPE}ISE
80820 I.IARGARETPRENDERcAST
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80821
80822
80823
SAN IIATEO UIIION HIGH
SCIIOOL DEVELOPI,4ENT TEE
SERVI CE UNL IMI TED INC.
BLOG. & GROUNDS }.IAI NT.
22,889.50 731 22152
830.68 \101 65100 190
115.78 101 55200 130
125.00 621 61150 110
SNAP ON TOOLS
SMALL TOOLS
80824 U S POSTAL SERVICE
OFF ICE EXPENSE
146.53
421 .88
80816 ITARDING ESE, lNC.
PROfESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
03002
421.88 101 68'010 2ZO 1347
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IEt,JARRAI,IT REGISTER
01t2s /02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks
101 66210 120
101 66210 130
101 65200 190
101 65200 202
101 65200 203
527 61520 130
620 66700 1ZO
PAGE I
Aliloul,tr
260.16
113.00
430.00
242.00
31,554.27
549.00
20,231.00
788.51
2,078.80
198.63
80.52
ACCoUItTNUMBER NAI'IE
80802
80809
ACE HARDI,IARE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SIIALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.{AI NT.
VEII ICLE iIAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
SMALL TOOLS
Iil I SC. SUPPLIES
80803 AHERICAII PUBLIC IIORKS ASSOCIATIO 01074
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIOIIS
80804 A}.,ITECH ELEVATOR SERVI CES
EOUI PTIENT I.IAI IIT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
0'1078
80805 ERENTON SATETY. INC.
}II SC. SUPPLIES
01400
80806
113.00 101 66100 240
00
00
10t 65400 200
619 61160 220 5110
212.00 527 66520 120
34,551.27 731 22563
549.00 101 10700
621 64450 160
621 61150 220
496.60
292.O1
101 65200 203
625 65?13 ZO3
2,078.80 101 64420 150
198.63 101 68020 192 2200
23.91
11.73
26.5A
15.30
't39, 13
23.07
39.90
20.37
1 .85
28.59
7,27
201
229
015 00
80807 BURL I NGAME RECREATION DEPT.
RECREAT ION EXPENSES
01663
80808
BURLI NGAI4E ELEI.I. SCflOOL DIST.
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE
CITY OF REDL'OOO CI TY
cofiMuN r cAT r 0|t s
CI TY HALL IlAINTENANCE
L. |i. cuRTIs & SONS
FIRE APPARATUS MAIIIT.
FIRE APPARATUS I.IA I NT.
E9ING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
MI SCETLANEOUS
01862
a?157
02160
020?7
80810 DULI N AOVERTISING INC.
PUEL I CATIONS & ADVERTISIIIG
02036
80811
FEOERAL EXPRESS
ltI scEt-t-A E0us
OFF ICE EXPEIISE
PERSONNEL EXAI.4INATIONS
PUBL I CAT IONS & ADVERIISING
101 64420 040
101 64250 110
101 64420 121
101 61120 150
80813 WATER/F INANCE PETIY CASH
I.4 I SCELLANEOUS
02181
3,315.65 A96 202A2
3,315.6'
01027
400.00
19,834.00
80812
01-22-2002
NAME
GEIIERAL FUND
CAPITAL II{PROVEIIENTS FUIID
I.]ATER FUND
SEI,'ER FUNO
SOLID !/ASTE fUND
GOLT CEIIIER FUND
SELF IIISURANCE FUND
FACI L IT TES SERVICES FUND
EOUI PIIENI SERVICES FUND
INTORI.IAIION SERVICES FUND
FIRE I.,IECHAI/IC SERVICES FU}IO
TRUST AND AGEIICY FUND
BURLINGAME TRAIN SNUTILE PROGRAI,I
UTILITY REVOLVTNG TUIID
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.IARRANI REGISTER
FUIID RECAP . 01-02
PAGE 12
AI,4OUNT
11
8
9
FUND
101
320
526
527
528
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
'110
10
165
3
7
9
82
13
7
6
404.53
413.57
369.02
?81.21
452.82
252.81
585.56
788.83
133.99
550.99
470.97
398,64
504.00
420,56
$446,860.53
HO}IORAELE I.IAYOR AND CITY COU}.ICIL:
TIIIS IS TO CERTIFY IIiAT THE CLAII.IS LISIED ON PAGES NUI4BERED FRO}I l THROUGH 12INCLUSM, AND/oR CLAI,|S NUilBERED tRO 806/+5 THRCIJGH 80801 rilcLUSrvE,TOTALtl,tG Iil
]!!_l!ggnT 0r s446,850,53, HAVE BEEI{ CNECKED rN DETATL A D AppRoVED By THE pROpER
OTIICIALS, AND IN I4Y OPIIIION REPRESEI'IT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY III
ACCORDANCE t,JITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INOICATED THEREOX. '\
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINAIICE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI4ENT
DATE
couIct L DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
t.lARRANT REGISTER
01 /22/0?
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
NUMEER NAME
80800 CANoN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC
CITY I.IALL MAINTENANCE
80801 DIEHL,EVANS & COMPANY, LLP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TOTAL
ACCOUNT
45.00 731 ?2518
236.55 101 65300 200
60,000.00 618 64520 601
2,668.00 101 66210 800
500.00 101 58010 ?20 1581
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
300.00 731 22534
60.60 101 51510
325.00 5?6 36730
650.00'\- .526 69020 260
5?.19 5?6 ?2500
1,5?3.15 621 64450 ?00
100.00 101 64250 240
PAGE 1 1
AMOUNT
80789 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION I'4GMT 23411
M I SCELLANEOUS
80790 IBM CORPORATION
EOUIPMENT MAINT,
23425
80791 BRIAN KELLEHER
CLAIMS PAYMENIS
23427
80792 UNITED RENTALS
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
23428
80793 JEFF LUGERNER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23429
80794 KEN GRAVEN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23430
80795 JOSH FERRERA
MI SCELLANEOUS
2343'.!
80796 FLOIIERS ELECTRIC
MI SCELLANEOUS
23432
80797 BURLINGAME TERRACE LLC
MI SCELLANEOUS
23433
80798 CAROL COTTIER
TRAINING EXPENSE
23434
80799 li{ARK 0'LEARY
M I SCELLANEOUS
23435
45.00
236.55
60,000.00
2,668.00
500. 00
500.00
300.00
60.60
325 .00
650.00
52.19
1,523.'.15
100-00
$446,860.53
?3436
23437
NUIIBER NAI.IE
80773
80771
80775
40776
80779
80780
B0781
8078? NAD I },iE RONSON
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80783
C! TY OF BURLINGAI.IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
01/22t02
VENDOR DETAILr*rDenotes Hand t ri tten Checks
MILLS PENII,ISULA HEALTH SERVICES 22751
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZEO S
TRAINI N6 EXPENSE
978.00
340.00
101 61120 210
101 65200 260
ACCOUNT AI.IOUNT
1 ,318.00
500.00
I,242.00
833.66
101.92
660.00
1 ,408.00
726.22
49,00
336.38
1,65.36
500.00
201 .48
144.97
320,00
FIRST AUTO}'IOT IVE DISTRIBUTORS
FIRE APPARATUS I{AI IIT.
80m EllrGBAtt's
cd.f.tult I cAT I 0N s
80778 AIYSON ZUPPERO
COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES
CARL DEOUAI,IT
COI{TRACTUAt SERVICES
JENXI NS/ATHENS INS
XI SCELLANEOUS
I.IERIT RESOURCE GROUP
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
OFF I CE DEPOT
OFF I CE EXPENSE
AT&T I,IIRELESS
cofi ut{ I cAT I 0N S
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
8,212.00 618 64520 038
833.66 625 65213 203
401.9? 101 65200 160
650.00 101 68010 220 116,1
'1,108,00 101 64420 210
726,22 101 680,t0 110 ,t100
49.00 101 65200 160
336.38 101 68010 220 1161
1,666.36 101 61250 220
500.00 101 58010 220 1581
201.48 101 66210 222
111.97 619 64460 120
320.00 't01 68010 220 1461
JO ANN COOPER
CONTRACTUAI- SERVICES
80784 BRUCE DOBBS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
22812
22851
22857
?2866
22917
23076
23153
23169
23195
23204
23284
23320
23305
80786 UNIVERSAL SPECI ALT I ES, IIIC.
I'II SC. SUPPLIES
23311
SAFETY SIGI/ COMPAXY
TRAFF I C CONTROL I,IATERIALS
40787 KELLY VENEZIA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80785
23382
1,800.00 320 79160 220
'l ,800.00
PAGE 10
80788 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40757 MARK MEYERS
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
80758 ERIAN BRINKERIIOFT
COilTRACTUAT SERVICES
80759 ROSERTS AIIO BRU}IE
MISC. SUPPLIES
NUMBER NAI,4E
80760
80761
80751
80766
AO77O UI]ITED RENTALS
[IISC. SUPPLIES
80771
CI TY OF BURLINGAME!/ARRANT REGISTER
01/2?/02
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
ACCOUNT
1,400.00 101 68010 220 1581
500.00 101 680',t0 220 1s81
137.30 527 66520 120
526.99 528 66600 210
600.00 320 80230 210
500.00 101 680,10 220 1581
8,501.00 736 61571 220
2,580.00 101 68010 220 146,1
125.41 101 68020 160 22oO
700,00 \101 68010 220 1581
12,290.50 101 65200 220
160.00 't01 68010 220 1451
12.00 101 68010 220 1580
572.3A 101 66?10 120
700.00 101 68010 220 1581
22051
22102
2?178
22324
22326
22429
22500
22521
22593
2?609
22620
22672
22712
22736
22747
PAGE 9
AI.IOJI,JT
1,400.00
500.00
526.99
600.00
500.00
8,504.00
2,580.00
12r.11
700.00
12,290.50
160.00
42.00
572.38
700.00
THERI.IO GAS IECI{
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
BUS rNESS 2000 mc
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
80762 ERIC SYI,{ANSKI
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
PARKI NG CO'IPAI,IY OF AXERICA
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
40761 LEott cAT lt c HA T ooR I Al,l
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80765 VERIZON UIREI.ESS
cot4 ull I cA otJS
I,4I KE GIUSTI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80767 COUI,ITY OF SAN MATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80769 JOHN TYLER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80768 ROBERTA TAVAKE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
I'II CHAEL LAZARUS
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
8077? r,iATT LEtJilo[
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
?274A
1,400.00 101 680,t0 220 1581
1 ,400.00
137,30
CITY OF BURLINGAi,,IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
01/22/02
UI.{BER NA},IE VE},IDORr*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
80712 ALFAX L'HOLESALE FURIIITURE, IIIC. 21505
CAPITAL EOUIP}IENI
80713 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE, INC.
EQUIPI,{ENT iIAI }JT.
21521
80741
DETAI L ACCOUNT
986.91 101 68010 800 tt01
66.56 10'1 65200 200
PAGE 8
AI4OIJNT
986 - 91
66.56
1 ,971 .25
460.00
280,00
.54
505.62
1 ,600.00
1 15.3/.
2,348,50
40.00
8,166.85
2,375.40
811 .49
DU-AIL SAFETY
TRAINING EXPENSE
TRAI}IIIIG EXPENSE
TRAINING EXPENSE
?1747
21789
21885
21931
21936
21947
21948
788.51
591 .36
591 .38
101 66240 260
526 69020 0
527 66520 260
TISA COFfARO
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
80747 CINGULAR L'IRELESS
CO}IiIUN I CAT I ON S
80748 AAA FIRE PROTECTIO}I
FIRE APPARATUS I,|AI T.
PROTESSI ONAL & SPECIAL]ZED S
8074s I'l0l'l I CA EHLERS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80716
80719 GREG BARNES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80750 SHO!/CASES
MISC. SUPPLIES
80751 A& L JA}IITORIAL SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80752
80754
160.00 lot 68010 220 146.1
280.00 '101 68010 220 1231
46.54 526 69020 160
275.00
230.62
529 68050 203 4200
619 64460 210 5220
PROVIDENCE PEST TERMI TE
PROFESSIO}IAI & SPECIAL I ZED S
80753 v8 coLF Ltc
I,{ I SCELLANEOUS
RECREATION PROGRAI,4 EXPEI,ISE
21981
80755 G}/IAC PAY',IE}JT PROCESSING CENTER
CAPITAL EOUIPME}/T
22006
IEDA
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
'1,600.00 101 68010 220 1581
115.34 \101 67500 120
2,348.50 619 64460 220 5210
40.00 619 64460 2't0 5160
7,487.15
979.70
529 36717
529 6A030 213
2,375.10 101 64420 210
841.49 101 66100 800
80756 J II'{ STOCKI,IELL
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
22048
1,400.00 101 68010 220 1581
1,400.00
?16?7
21713
li
NUMEER NAME
80729
8073 0
8021
80734
80rJ5
80rJ9
CITY OF EURLINGAI,IEI.'ARRANI REGISIER
01/?2/O2
80726 lro|, cA otsEN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GE CAPITAL
EOUI PiIENT ilAINT.
80728
VEiIDOR OETAI Lr*rDenotes Hand l./ri tten Checks
19A32
ACC0Ulrr
600.00 101 68010 220 1461
118.00 527 665?0 180
526.24 't01 64250 200
580.00 621 64450 160
3,500.00 320 75170 210
197.70 101 680'10 120 1320
170.45 620 66700 800
130.20 620 15000
500.00 10't 68010 220 1581
20060
20216
?0?46
20501
20548
205 70
20633
20654
21360
21126
PACE 7
AI,4OUN T
600.00
1t8-00
526.21
580.00
3,500.00
197.70
170.15
130.20
600.00
21.0A
2,181.00
475 .00
280.00
1,100.00
700.00
AFFINITEL COi4I4UN I CAT IONS
cofi ut{IcATI0NS
LYIJX TECHNOLOGIES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
COUNTY OI SAII MATEO
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
80732 UNITED RENTALS
CAPI TAL EOUIPMENT
8O7J3 BRIDGE IIIRELESS
SUPPL IES
20706
80736 IBS EUILDIIIG MAINTENANCE CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20783
80737 CATIIER INE J.I1. NILI.IEYER
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
2080'l
I,4I CRO [/AREHOUSE
CAPITAT EOUIPI'IE}II
EOUIPI.4ENT I.IAI }IT.
80738 MELANIE I.IARAN I
CONTRACTUAL SERV!CES
DE},I},IIS HASKETT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
264.00 \ 101 65200 800-239.9? 320 80420 200
SPITERI IS HARDI,'O(n
BLDG. & GROTJNDS MAI}IT.
80740 RICK KALEHENII
COI]TRACTUAL SERVICES
2,181.00 619 61160 220 5180
175.00 7i1 22525
280.00 'to't 68010 220 1231
1,100.00 101 68010 190 110,1
40741 PREETI B. TIKEKAR
CITY HALL MAINTENAIICE
21129
4,320.00 621 64450 220
1,320.OO
80727 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
RENTS & LEASES
?1132
700.00 101 68010 220 1581
I]UMBER NAI.IE
80714
80715
80719
80720
80721
80721
CITY OF BURI INGAI4EI.IARRANT REGISIER
01/22t02
VENDOR DETAIL.*' Denotes Hand Irritten Checks
PAGE 6
80712 LABOR READY, INC.
TEMPORARY EUPLOYI,4EiIT SVC.
80710 KELLEIIER & ASSOCIATES 18239
PROFESSIOIIAT & SPECIAL IZED S
80711
ACCT}TJNT
8,318.31 61A 64520 210
684,58 620 '15000
54?.40 525 69020 011
720.00 101 68010 220 1231
351.00 619 61460 210 5220
700.00 101 68010 220 1581
DqJG'S I.IO]ORCYCLE SERVICE
SUPPL IES
80713 LYIINE TIRESTONE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18337
18659
18746
18959
18990
19027
19011
19083
19145
19190
1969a
AHOUNT
8,318.31
681.58
542.10
720.00
35'1 .00
115.25
136,04
3/.0.00
18.00
610.73
501.61
225.00
750.00
370.00
BAY ALARI.I
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL ] ZED S
STEVEII BAUM
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PRUDENT IAL OVERALL SUPPTY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80718 PEGGY GUARALDI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
80716 ACCESS UIIIFORMS & EI,IBROIDERY
U}I I FORMS AND EOUIPMEIIT
U}II FORI,IS AND EAUIPI.IEIIT
80717
72.63
72.62
527 66520 140
619 61460 110
19239
807?2 I,JIiIGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANI]ING
MI SCELLANEOUS
19471
PRIORITY 1
CAPITAT EOUI PiIEIIT
80723 14I CHAEL FLERES
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
A}IG NEL'SPAPERS
MISC. SUPPLIES
IlilAcEllAx, INc.
MI SCELLAIIEOUS
REDL'O@ CITY.SAN IiATEO COUNTY
TRAVEL & I'IEETINGS
136,04 101 65200 220
340.00 101 68010 220 1461
18.00 101 6,i.400 120
610-73 731 22518
501.61 620 66700 800
225.00 731 22525
750.00 101 68010 220 158,1
370.00 101 64150 250
80725 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP INC
EOUIPI'IENT TIAINT.
19791
27.06 10't 65300 ?00
27.06
18854
700.00
NUIIEER NAI.IE
80695
80696
40697
80699
8070't
80708
SAN i4ATEO LOCK IJORKS
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
ACCdJ},JT
9.99 101 68010 120
PAOE 5
AMOTJNT
9.99
234.05
158.22
157 .78
11 ,328.75
206.25
9,212.91
599.94
22.41
't,400,00
531 ,20
952.s0
386.36
CITY OF BURLINGAIIE
},A R R A N I R E G I S T E R
01/22t02
III LLBRAE LOCK SHOP
S}.IALL TOOLS
MISC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
527 66520 130
619 64460 120 5110
620 't5000
101 68010 120
101 68010 800 158,1
VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand t/ritten Checks
14613
15739
15A27I't D LI NE}I SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80698 ACTIoII SPORTS
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IEI{T
158.22 101 65200 220
16167
16317
16391
16911
'174'14
17577
17588
17702
17711
1 18.40
3, 100.00
SYD}IEY t,IALKOO
SIIALL TOOLS
8O7OO AETHER SYSTE}IS
CAPITAL EOU IPI,4ENT
16575
80702 LINHART PETERSEN POUERS ASSOC.
11I SCELLANEOUS
16599
COI.IMUII ITY GATEPATH
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
80703 cr NrAs coRP, #464
U}I I FORI4S AND EAUIPiIEIJT
80704 PRIOE PAINT
BLDG, & GROUNDS I.IAI IiT.
80705 STEVE GOLDBERG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80706 ROBYN CITAT,iARA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11,328.75 101 55200 800
206.25 101 66210 210
9,242.91 731 22515
599.94 \. 101 68020 t4o 2300
22.41 '10't 68020 190 2200
1,400.00 101 68010 220 1581
952,50 618 64520 210
385.36 526 69020 1?0
CAL I FOR}I IA PNEUTIATIC ]OOL CO
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
80709 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I,JATER
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
17761
13,706.00 526 69020 210
13,706.00
3,218.40
80707 GORDON E. I.IC CLINTOCK
PROFESSIO},IAI. & SPECIAL I ZED S
157.78 520 66700 130
531.20 101 68010 2?0 146,1
,5 .21
'146.60
32.21
IIUIJBER IIAI'IE
80684
80685 GARY M. OLSO}I, PH.D.
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
LEONA MORIARTY
CO}ITRACTIJAL SERVICES
PIP PRTNTING
Mlsc. suPPuEs
CO.IMAIR MECHAI]ICAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80691
CI TY OF BURLIXGAI.IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
01/22/02
VEiIDOR DETAIL,*r Denotes Hard tlritten Checks
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDIIARE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SitALL IOOLS
8LDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
TRAFF IC CONTROL I'IATERIALS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
IRAINING EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
MISC. SUPPTIES
120
130
190
222
120
260
120
't30
190
120
09670
09902
09979
10557
11773
14007
11211
14334
101
101
101
101
526
526
527
527
529
619
68020
66210
68020
66?10
69020
69020
66520
66520
68030
61160
2300
2200
1200
594,75
100.64
,?,23
34.54
116.34
28.06
95.00
32.09
258.08
163.52
ACCOUNT
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
1 ,775 .?5
300.00
840.00
2,364.61
5,072,75
53 .17
340.54
'100.00
80686
80587
80688
80689
80690
80692
80693
CAL.STEAiI
MI SCELLANEOUS
TRATF I C CONTROL },IATERIALS
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPL IES
101 68020 192 ?200
101 66210 222
526 69020 1?O
527 66520 120
619 61460 120
10620
IDEAL RESTORAT IVE DRYI},IG, INC.
cLAI[S PAYt'tEHTS
11352
300.00 101 65200 260
8/,0,00 101 68010 220 1311
69.11
11 ,37
76.61
116.06
33,U
2,364.61 10'l 54400 120
5,07?.75 618 64520 601
ELECTRO.I.IOT IOII INCORPORATED
PUMP EqUIPMENT REPAIR
PUMP EqUI PII4ENT REPAIR
PROTESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
526 69020 230
5?7 &520 230
519 64460 210 5't60
1,190.75
I ,190.75
2,709.U
KE I TI] t,{ARSHALL
TRAVEL & I'IEETINGS
DE!/EY PEST CONIROL
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
340.51 101 65200 250
100.00 101 66210 210
80694 BAY AREA AIR OUALITY
t.I I SC. SUPPLIES
11358 68.00 620 f6700 120
68.00
337 ,32
5,091.36
53.17 619 64160 210 5180
80673 PK SAFETY SUPPLY
TRAI I,I IIIG EXPENSE
80674 I{ARGARETPRENDERGAST
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CI]Y OF BURTIIIGAI.IEL'ARRAIIT REGISIER
01/?2/02
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand l,/ritten Checks
NUMBER NAME
80670 PACI FIC NURSERIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
80671 PACIFIC BELL
UTII,ITY EXPENSE
80672 PATTERSON PARTS, INC
FIRE APPARATUS I.IA I NT.
SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
1,187. 320 78190 120
9,420.56 896 20281
167.05
514.79
101 55200 203
520 15000
64.00
217 .25
101 6s200 202
520 15000
1 ,009.95
199.17
101 58020 130 2300
'101 68020 200 2200
CITY OT SAN MATEO
tII SCELLAIIEOUS
8O6N SEAUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
I'TISCELLANEOUS
HoR I Z0|l
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
03536
80678 TIMBERTIIiE TREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
03760
80679
SA}I FRANCISCO UATER DEPT.
L'ATER PURCHASES
TURT & INDUSTRIAL EOUIPI'IENT CO.
EOU IPI4ENT MAINT.
NOEL L. I.II LLER, INC,
VEHI CLE }.,IAIIIT.
SUPPLIES
SAN l,lAIEo LA!,N liOlJER SlloP
SI,IALL TOOLS
EOUI PMENT I,IAI NT.
52.18 619 54460 ?60
'139,989.08 526 69020 171
1,411.36 101 66240 172
2,550,00 526 69020 233
8,955.32 10'1 68020 220 2300
252,91 529 68030 l20 4200
03041
03106
03108
03179
03353
03366
09130
09319
09199
09560
PAGE 3
A OJNT
1 ,187.
9,1?0.56
681 .84
53/,.38
139,989.08
1,111.36
2,650.00
8,955 ,32
252.91
128.78
311 .25
1 ,209 .13
80675
80676
80680
80681
80682
80683 I.IARGARET KRAMER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
49612
3,000.00 101 68010 220 146,1
3,000.00
52.18
534.38 101 68010 220 1347
128.78 101 68020 200 2200
03080
80657 OULII,I ADVERTISI}IG INC. 02036
PUBL I CAT IONS & ADVERTISING
80658
CITY OT BURLII,IGA}IEt]ARRAIIT REGISTER
01/22/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
NUHBER NAI'IE
GENE EVANS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
80659 EL/I I'IG IRRICATION PRODUCTS
I,4ISCELLAIIEOTJS
80660 T]. L'. GRAINGER, INC.
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
IIRE APPARATUS IIAINT.
80663
80664
80665
ACCOUNT
172.66 101 64420 'r50
502.50 101 6A010 220 1342
97,89 101 68020 192 2200
PAGE 2
AI4OUNT
472.6
502.50
97 .a9
502.91
77.92
700.00
6,925.83
't ,531.65
537.60
5,284.40
572.59
625.61
80661 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPEIlSE
80562 CIIARLES J. HAPP
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
n.92 101 &210 226
700.00 101 68010 220 1581
6,925.83 528 66600 210
537.60 \10'l 65300 011
4,450.69
833.71
385.68
117 -23
10't 68020 120
101 65200 203
526 69020 120
527 66120 120
125.28
140.08
284.21
02119
0?157
02248
02261
02819
02880
02898
02944
2200
02360
HARDING ESE, TNC.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
02365
02615K & I./ DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
I{ I SC. SUPPL!ES
14
8
101 65240 120
320 73051 120
619 64460 120
80656
80667
II1ANPOI,JE R
TE}.'PORARY EI.{PLOYMENT SVC.
US FILTER
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
t'II LLBRAE LUiIBER CO.
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
8LDG, & GROUNDS MAINT.
SIDE!/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURTACI }IG EXPEIISE
.'II SC. SI.JPPLIES
't01 662',t0 120
't01 68020 190 2200
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
527 66520 120
43
59
80668 iroToRorA INC.
SUPPLIES 625.61 620 '15000
80669 NATIONI'IDE UIRE & BRUSH HFG.
EOUTPi4ENT I.IAI NI.
03002
72.53 101 66210 200
72.53
543.64
n5.63
214.38
CI TY OF BURLINGAME
I.IARRANT REGISTER
01/22/02
VENDOR DETAI tr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
PAGE 1
NUMBER NAI,IE
80645
80616
a0647
80651
806t2
80653
B0654
80655
ACTION CLEA}IIIIG SERVICE
EOUIPIlE}iT MAINI.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COTITRACTUAL SERVICES
BLOG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
101 65400 200
320 80580 220
619 61160 220 5110
621 64450 190
I{AT]HELI BENDER & COI'IPANY. INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
01112
01313
01400
015 07
01521
01624
01745
01857
02027
319.O3
2,820.00
5 ,016.57
127 -A1
44.06
107.81
189.66
2,819,11
17.31
26.11
2,753,7a
79,15
ACCOUI,iT AMOUNT
8,343.11
1 ,261 .42
33.19
3,197.98
2,859.05
5,198.71
7,8'l8. oo
1 .'t 03. 15
1,318.50
103.t0
HAREOR SAND & GRAVEL
MISC. SUPPLIES
HI SC. SUPPLIES
PENI NSULA FORD OF BURLINGAME
EOUI P}IEI,IT I'{AI NT.
MI SCELTANEOUS
SUPPL IES
CI TY OF BURLINGAME
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
}II SC. SUPPLIES
MI SCELLANEOUS
LEAGUE OF CAL I FORN IA CITIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GCS I/ESTERN POI,/ER &
SUPPLIES
ANASTASIA COI.E
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
035.78
227.64
101 66210 120
526 69020 120
61.59 '.101 54350 120
33.19 527 6l520 260
80648 BRENTON SATETY, INC,
TRAI III NG EXPENSE
80619
80650
65200 201
65200 202
65200 203
'15000
65213 203
101 58020 200 2200
101 6t100 703
620 15000
BURLINGAI.IE AUTO SUPPLY
GAS, OIL & GREASE
VEIIICLE I.lAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS MAI I,IT.
SUPPLIES
FIRE APPARATUS MAI NT.
'!01
'101
101
620
625
3,400.00
1 ,298,71
500.00
101 680'10 114 1100
101 680'10 120 1321
731 22531
7,818.00 101 61560 210
1,103,15 620 15000
't,3'18.50 101 58010 220 1344
103.50 101 65200 140
L. N. CURTIS & SOIIS
UNI FORMS AND EOUIPMENT
80655 I1ARY LEE OELETiANTY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.00 101 68010 220 1161
340.00
64.59
01030
01915
02033
01- 11-2002
ilAl,lE
CITY OF BURLINGAI,TEL'ARRAIIT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01.02
GENERAT FUND
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVE}IENTS fUND
SE!/ER CAP ITAL PROJECT FUI]D
UATER FUND
SEI,'ER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES TUND
EOUIPMENT SERVICES TUND
I NFORI4ATION SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUIIO
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
FUi]D
'101
130
320
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
n'l
896
PAGE 9
AI,iOUNT
86,932.58
662.52
285 ,943,35
125,910.05
1,047.16
68,051.61
767 .51
11 ,027.62
2,155.28
8,763.09
566 - 50
7,016.56
57.34
$601,901 .17IOIAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE I,IAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
RESPECTFUI.LY SUBI,4I TTED,
THIS IS TO
I NCLUSI VE,
THE AI,IOTJNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
CERTIFY THAT THE CLA]IIS LISTEO O}I PAGES XUI,IBERED FROI '1 TXRCT.JGH 9
AND/OR CLAIMS NUTIBERED FRO4 80'48 THRqJGH 80644 IXCLUSIVE,TOTALTNG IN
OF S601,901.17, HAVE EEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED iY THE PROPER
ANO III MY OPINIO}.I REPRESEI{T FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAINST IHE CITY INIiITH ]HEIR RESPECTIVE AI,IOUXTS AS INDICATED TIIEREON.\
FINAiICE D IRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYME}IT
DATE
DATECOUNCI L
NUI.IBER NAI'IE
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI,IARRANT REGISTER
01/ 11/02
80642 OAY IJIRELESS SYSTEI,IS
SUPPLIES
80643 IBM CORPORATION
EOUI PMENT I'IAI I'IT.
80641 HOSE & FITTINGS, ETC
MI SC. SUPPLIES
TOTAL
VEIIDOR
'*r Denotes HaM Liritten checks
OETAI L ACCOUNT
23424 34.56 620 15000
23425 54.15 101 65300 200
21426 44.81 526 69020 120
PAGE 8
AI.iOtJNT
34.56
51.15
44.81
$60'1,901 .17
NUMBER IIAT4E
80627
CITY OF BURLINGA}IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
01/'t1to?
VENDOR OE]AILr*r Denotes Hahd tlritten Checks
PAGE 7
A}1OUNT
3,704.03
63.95
316.19
1,074.25
24 ,898.31
3,300.00
189 - 61
494.40
88,554.19
9,965.OO
796.92
12,333.60
GLASER AND ASSOCIATES
TRAI N I IIG EXPE}ISE
TRAI N ING EXPEIISE
22821
22851
22921
23005
23035
3
ACCOT'NT
63.95 101 64100 120
301.03
400.00
101 64420 260
526 69020 260
80628 LANDS' END, INC.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
26
290
49
00
101 65100 ',t 10
101 65100 220
80630 cPs
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS
80631 cRrTtcAL soLUTI0[S, lNC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
80532 MERIT RESqJRCE GROUP
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
80633 THE iIOBILE STORAGE GROUP
REI.ITS & LEASES
80634 KEY RESOURCES
TEI.iPORARY EXPLOYI.IEI,IT SVC.
80635 JO ANII COOPER
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80636 I,IAI F I'IULLIIIS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80637 iIISAN CONSTNUCIION, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80638 REPUELIC ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80639 THE CASH REGISTER CO.
CAPI'TAL EOUI PMENT
80640 PiI FITIIESS GROUP
CAPITAL EOUIPiIENT
1,074.25 101 &120 121
24,894.31 320 76010 210
3,300.00 10't 64420 120
189.61 526 69020 180
494.10 101 65300 0ll
845.02 101 61250 210
360.00 101 6a010 220 1311
84,154,19 320 71171 220
9,965.00 320 79160 220
796.92 101 65100 800
12,!33.60 't01 6t200 800
23138
23139
?3201
23290
23328
23382
23421
23122
80611 JEAI'I GOROST IAGUE
MI SCELLANEOUS
23423
6,123.75 731 22546
6,123.75
80629 PI TNEY SOJES
OFFICE EXPENSE
CON]RACTUAL SERVICES
815.02
360.00
23076
8061 1
80612
80613
80611
80615
806',l9
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE
T'ARRAI,I T REGISTER
01111t02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*! Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
1,172.22
275 .00
500.00
481 ,17
26,116.87
80.00
267,91
57 .34
16,359 .87
20?.51
89 ,335.45
200.00
288.00
FRISCO DEI. ROSARIO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
F I LTERFRESH COFFEE EXCE!LENCE
BLDG. & GRCI,IIDS I1AINT.
PORTOSA}I
I,,I I SC. SUPPLIES
LISA COFFARO
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
CINGTJLAR IIIRELESS
cor,$ru[ I cAT r 0N s
PROVIOENCE PEST TERI.IITE
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IALIZED S
80518 ARCH 9IRELESS
cofi u IcAT I0[S
21717
80616 !'I LBUR SUIT}I ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAT & SPECIAL IZED S
21769
80617
ACCOUNT
1,17?.22 101 68010 220 1347
275.00 6?1 64450 190
225,00 529 58030 120 4400
500.00 101 680',t0 220 1346
1A1.17 l0l 66100 160
26,115.87 320 80480 210
80.00 619 61160 210 5170
267.91 l0'1 65100 150
57.34 896 202A1
16,359.87 .\527
66520 210
202,51 529 58030 120 4200
340,00 529 68030 800 1200
89,535.45 320 80270 220
200.00 10'1 64420 030
288.00 101 54120 210
21442
21623
21656
21947
220A9
?2301
22115
22138
80620 JCC , r i,ic.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
22157
80621
AT&I
UIILITY EXPENSE
SI ERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
80622 J.M. RIDG|AY CO.
CAPITAL EAUIPI.{ENT
80623 B 1 ENTERPRISE CORP.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22660
a0624 PUBLIC EI,'PLOYEES RETIREI,IENT SYST 22730
I.4 I SCELLA}IEOUS
80625 MILLS PEI.IINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
22751
80625 J IM NAI,iTE L L
HI SCELLANEOUS
?2762
1,137.53 101 64150 031
1,137.53
NUIIBER NA},,!E
225.00
340.00
21713
19397
80598 JOHI,J CAIIALAN, ASLA
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
19561
80599
AIiIBIANCE FLORAL STUDIO
I.I I SCETTANEOIJS EXPENSE
PR IOR I TY 1
CAPI TAL EOUIPI.IENT
L]I LSEY & IIAM
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CREATIVE It'ITERCONNECT
Col{l,lUN I CAI Iotls
KATHY KARAS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
i/UII1BER NAI.IE
80595
80596
80597
80600
80602
80603
80604
80505
80606
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IEliARRANT REGISTER
01/ 11102
VEIIDOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
ACC0UtiT
46,44 101 64100 290
767.72 620 66700 600
10,757,0O 320 78290 210
1,269.50 320 80140 210
22A.$ 101 65200 160
320.00 101 68010 220 1342
1 ,251,37 620 15000
1,306.50 101 68010 120 1323
355.04 101 65100 160
500.00 \520 75110 220
270,33 101 64200 150
221.46 101 68010 220 1347
364,00 526 69020 120
298.40 520 ',15000
30,161.55 320 76110 220
19205
19239
19768
19812
20008
20105
20301
20335
20383
20547
20894
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
46.44
767 .72
I ,269 .50
22A -36
320.00
1 ,251 .37
1,306.50
355.04
500,00
270.33
224.16
364.00
294.10
30,161 .55
EL CAMINO CHARTER LII]ES II,IC
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
AT&T 9IRELESS
CO.iI.IUNICATIONS
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
IIIG CLASSI FIEDS
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISIIIG
ARLETTE PETERSOII
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
80607 r,t I cRo I,AREHoUSE
t'lISC. SUPPLIES
MIKE BRO!'I,J ELECTR I C CO.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
20706
80608 II|ELEN ENGTNEERING C0., rNC.
SUPPLIES
20823
80609
806'10 SPARTAN TOOI. LLC
It I SC. SUPPLIES
21329
635.58 527 6r.520 120
635-58
80601 G.N. REIN, I[C.
SUPPLI ES
10, 757.00
LINDA HOECK
CONTRACTUAL SERV]CES
cELS0C
OUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
CITY OF EURLINGAI.IEI,JARRANT REGISTER
01/ 11/02
VENDOR DETAI Lri! oenotes tlaM L,.itten Checks
ACCCI,JNT
4,937,40 101 65100 220
6,411.01 520 15000
455.00 101 65100 291
190
190
190
2,060.00 101 68010 220 1346
78t.88 101 64250 200
55.00 101 65200 205
304.28 320 80190 't 20
1,905.42 527 &520 Z3O
512,40 526 69020 011
39.37 526 69020 160
186.00 619 6t 450 210 5180
280.00 525 69020 290
NUI.IBER NAiIE
80580 AtL CITY MANAGEI.IEIII
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
8058'l VALLEY Ott CO.
SUPPLIES
80582 PARK-ct Lr.tA CLINICS, I C.
PRI SONER EXPENSE
80583
80581
80585
80585
]ELEKEY SCADA SYSTEI.{S I IIC.
8LDG. & GROUNDS }IAI IiT.
BLDG. & GRqJNDS MAINT.
8LDG. & GROUNDS I,IAI IIT.
101 66210
526 69020
5?7 66520
't5595
15764
15792
'16085
16390
16802
17534
18450
18659
18854
18951
1 ,27j.r4
1 ,273.33
1 ,273.33
PACE 4
AIIOIJNT
4 ,937 .10
6,411.04
155.00
3,820.00
2,060.00
92.91
785.88
55.00
304.28
1 ,905.42
512.40
39.37
186.00
280.00
16913
80587 r.rETRO tloBlLE COt4t{UilrCAT rO}lS
RADIO }IA I }I].
17402
80588
IIRON
EOUIP}'IENT IIA I NT.
PENINSULA OI GI TAL Ii'IAGING
MISC. SUPPLIES
80589 PEI]INSULA PUMP &
PU}IP EOUI PI4ENT REPAIR
80593 AHERICATI IJATER IJORKS ASSN.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPEIISE
80590 LABOR READY, INC,
TEI'IPORARY EI.IPLOYME},IT SVC.
80591
80592
VERIZON I,IIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763
c0l4r,4uN I cAT I0 S
BAY ALARM
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
220
220
220
3
3
3
ACCESS UNI FORI,4S & EIIBROIOERY
UNI FORI'IS AI,ID EOUIPI.IENT
UNI FORI1S AIID EOUIPI,IE}{T
U}II FORMS AI/D EOUIPI.iENT
18990
'101 66210 140
526 69020 110
527 66520 140
9?.91 101 66100 240
80591 660.93
CITY OF BURLINGAI4EI.IARRA}IT REGISIER
01/ 11/0?
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand gritten Checks
80570
80571
80572
805 73
80574
80575 DAY.TIIIERS, INC.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
80576
80578
PAGE 3
CHIET GARY I..,. IlISSEL
OFF I CE EXPEI,ISE
MISC. SUPPLIES
UNI FORMS AND EOUIPI.IEIIT
cofiituN I cAT I o[ S
BLDG. & GROUIIDS I.IAINT.
EAUIPI4ENT i{AINT.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
IRAVEL & I,IEETIIIGS
TRAIIII}IG EXPE}ISE
PRISOIIER EXPENSE
POLICE INVEST IGAT ION EXPENSE
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
EI.IPLOYEE BE}IEFITS
I.I I SCELLAXEOUS
POLICE SECURI TY SERVICES
13720
13758
13759
13950
14338
14411
14523
11855
14957
1 ,098.30
1 ,823.39
105,58
4.67
105.30
1 ,967.16
1',t2,70
504.90
2,198.00
150.00
t86.57
326.13
80.95
626.80
43.88
101 65
101 65
'101 65
101 65
't0't 65
101 65
101 65
101 65
101 65
101 65
101 65
101 55
100 110
120
140
160
190
200
240
250
260
291
29z
703
100
't 00
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
ACCOJNT AMOUNT
9,534.43
291 .50
1 ,249 .02
2,880.00
1 ,607.'19
33.46
70.20
375 ,84
54.34
DAIIKA OTFICE IMAGII{G CO
OFTICE EXPEi/SE
THE I.IAG I C PRESS CORP.
OFF I CE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
GEORGE t'. GI PE
PROFESSIO}IA L&
H. D.
SPECIATIZED S
DEI,IEY PEST CONTROL
RAT CONTROL PROGRAI4
291.50 621 64150 't10
334.80
914,22
130 21025
731 22571
731 22570
'101 55100 110
10't 65400 120
RECHARGE I EiI
OTFICE EXPEI]SE
80577 ROYAL UI'IOIESALE ELECTRIC
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
2,880.00 320 80410 210
1,607.19 \101 66210 21A
33,46
'27
66520 120
70.20 101 65200 110
375.84 320 73051 120
51.34 101 66210 226
MI CHAEL I S RE}ITALS INC.
STREET RESURfACI NC EXPENSE
693
693
695
34
33
33
190
190
190
80579 IZI.IIRIAN R@FI}IG
BLDG. & GROU}IOS I.IAI NT.
BLDG. & GROUIIDS I.iAI NT.
8LDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
15573
101 66210
526 69020
527 66520
2,080.00
NUMBER NAI.IE
NUMEER NAME
CITY OF EURLINGAME!,ARRANT REGISTER
01 I 11 /02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand [.lritten Checks
PAGE 2
80562 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
PERSONNEL EXAMI NATIOI{S
UNIFORMS AND EOUIPTIENT
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
COMMUNICATIONS
8LDG. & cRotNDS tlAINT.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAINING EXPENSE
EI4PLOYEE BENEFITS
MISC. SUPPLIES
MI SCELLAIIEOUS
0391 0
80563 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910
t.I I SCELLANEOUS
80554 L'EST GROUP PAYMENT CTR.
MISC. SUPPLIES
03954
80565 BERNICE INN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
09088
166.20 731 22534
682.03 101 54350 120
1,104.00 101 68010 220 1344
855.37 101 66100 210
9,627.62 618 64520 210
229.00 320 79020 210
1,400.00 618 64520 504
345.50
1,606.20
147.09
62.10
1 99.00
19.99
703.2?
1 28.00
269.50
305.26
145.00
36.31
581.57
296-36
55.93
101
'101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
130
320
731
110
120
121
140
150
160
190
210
220
240
250
260
120
1 100
1323
ACCOUNT
68010
68010
64420
68020
68010
68010
68010
64420
58010
68010
58020
68020
21025
80200
22545
AMOUNT
4,901 .13
166.20
682.03
1 , '104.00
855.37
9,627.62
229.00
1 ,400 . 00
2300
1452
1 100
1 100
1231
1 100
2300
21 00
80566 ocE'-BRUNING, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80567 ABAG . LIABILITY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
80568 MEYERS, NAVE, RIEACK, SILVER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
09493
09518
11101
80569 IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYING, INC.
TII SCELLANEOUS
11352
I
lt f
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI,IARRANT REGISTER
01 /11 /0?
VENDOR DETAILr*t Denotes Hand i,lritten Checks
01 030
ACCOUNT
1,671.96 619 64460 120 5130
289.05 101 64550 120
90.84 101 66210 120
960.00 101 68010 220 1344
145.16 101 65200 203
830.87 101 64420 150
80548 ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
}.II SC. SUPPL I ES
80549 }|ATTHE!' BENDER & CoMpANy, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
80550 BRENTON SAFETY, INC.
I'1I SC. SUPPL I ES
8055 1 ANASTASIA COLE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80552 L. N. CURTIS & SONS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAINT.
80553 DULIN ADVERTISING INC.
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
80554 US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
80555 ETJING IRRIGATI0I'l PRODUCTS
M I SCELLA}IEOUS
80556 l,r,Lr. GRAINGER, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
TRAINING EXPENSE
80557 GRANITE ROCK COIiIPANY
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE
80558 K & L' DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
80559 MANPOIJER
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC.
80560 P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
SANDRA POBE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I 25,91 o. 05
20,136.96
11 ,602.96
15,190.39
327 79480 ?10
527 66530 190
527 66530 210
527 66530 800
PAGE 1
Al''l0UNT
'l ,671 .96
289.05
90-84
960.00
145.16
830.87
172,840.36
1 50.36
?17.32
3?3.21
1,652.40
1 ,075.20
19,894.84
013'.t2
01400
01945
0?027
02036
02110
02157
02248
02261
02645
02819
03054
160.36 101 68020 19? 2ZO0
118.21 '\619 64460 120 513099.',t1 619 &460 ?60
323.21 101 66210 226
1,652.40 101 6r,240 1?0
1,075.20 101 65300 011
19,894.84 101 66240 170
80561 031 75
2,824.50 101 68010 220 1340
2,824.50
/
I
Invostments
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value
'/o ol
Portfollo
Days to
Maturity
YTM YTM
Value Term 360 Equiv, 305 Equiv,
LAIF & County Pool
CORP NOTES
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
16,705,011.56
3,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
16,705,0 t 1.56
3,068,750.00
'15,209,030.00
16,705,01 1 .56
3,027,780.00
15,000,000.00
48.10
8.72
43.1 I
,|
1,596
1,826
1
545
1,421
3.1 88
5.929
5.665
3.232
6.011
5.744
34,705,011.56 35,062,791.56 34,732,791.s6 100.00%928 662 4.497 4.559
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are
RAHN A. BECKER, FINANCE
IS
137,374.93 1,067,536.21
34,689,470.55 35,336,796.73
4.66% 5.13%
funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun oate: 0211212002 - 10:33
?- / 3'o2
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Average
Balance
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
January 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value
YTM Daysto
365 Maturity
Page 2
Maturity
Date
LAIF & County Pool
77
79
LOCAL AGENCY INV,FD.
S M COUNTY POOL
Subtotal and Average
9,916,001.33
6,789,010.23
9,916.00'l .33
6,789,010.23
9.916,001.33
6,789,010.23
2.960
3.630
2.960
3.630
16,339,109.01 18,705,011.50 16,705,011.56 16,705,011.56 3.232 ,|
CORP NOTES
0739028M9
37042R2C5
487
489
BEAR STEARNS CORP
GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP
Subtotal and Average
03/02/1999
0412011999
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,072,500.00
1 ,016,250.00
1,997,500.00
1,030,280.00
6.1 50
6.750
6.1 79
5.685
760 03t02t2004
129 06t10t2002
3,027,780.00 3,000,000.00 3,088,750,00 3,027,780.00 0.011 545
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
31 331 LKK3
3133M3TS4
3133M7Y75
3133MD225
3133MF2D9
3133MHJ62
3136F0Y29
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FANNIE MAE
Subtotal and Average
499
476
488
494
498
504
502
oan312001
03/1 7/1 998
03t22h9SS
020812001
0512412001
09128t2001
o812812001
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,O28,120.00
1,039,690,00
2,097,500.00
2,001,880.00
2,023,120.00
2,011,240.00
4,067,480.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5.800
6.020
6.000
6.250
5.630
5.550
5.420
5.800
6.020
6.000
6.250
5.630
5.550
5.420
06/1 3/2006
0311712003
03t222004
02o812006
0512412006
0912812006
08t28t2006
1,593
409
780
1,466
1,573
1,700
'1,669
15,322,580.65 15,000,000.00 15,269,030.00 15,000,000.00 5.7M 1,421
Total lnvestments and Average 34,889,470.55 34,705,01 t,56 35,062,79{.58 34,732,791.58 4.559 062
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMz) SymRept V5.02fRun Date O2rZ'2OO2 - 10i33
1
1
,a
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity By Type
January 1,2002 through January 31,2002
Page 3
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Beglnnlng
Balanco
Stated
Rate
Transactlon
Dato
Purchases
or Deposlts
Sales/Maturltlos
or Wlthdrawalg
Endlng
Balance
LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary)
77 LOCAL AGENCY INV,FD,79 S MCOUNryPOOL
Subtotal
2.960
3.630
84,085.27
476,963.1 7
500,000.00
0.00
16,643,963.12 581,O48.U 500,000.00 16,705,0tL56
CORP NOTES
Subtotal 3,027,780.00 3,027,780.00
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3133MFUB2 500 0.00FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal
5.250 01t11t2002 1,000,000.00
16,000,000,00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1 5,000,000.00
Total 35,671,743.12 561,0.1E,.H 1,500,000.00 34,732,751.56
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:0z122002 - 10:33
Month
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity Summary
January 2001 through January 2002
Yleld to Maturlty Managed
360 365
Number
of Securltles
Purchased
Number
of Securities
Matured / Sold
Average
Term
Average
Days to MaturityEndYear
Number of
Securities
Total
lnvested Equivalent Equlvalent
Pool
Rate
Page 4
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
2001
200'l
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
17
17
15
14
14
13
15
14
15
12
12
12
11
3s,405,206.28
35,707,733.22
34,010,264.54
37,255,372.54
38,758,088.25
36,085,177.06
38,447,819.42
38,002,167.12
34,930,381.22
32,614,594.78
33,056,179.95
35,671,743.12
34,732,791.56
6.084
5.994
5.963
5.737
5.609
5.431
5.396
5.287
5.352
4.880
4,812
4.629
4.497
6.169
6.077
6,046
5.817
5.687
5.507
5.471
5.361
5.426
4.948
4.879
4,694
4.559
6.1 30
5.979
5.869
5.417
5.200
4.767
4.632
4.484
4.214
3.809
3.683
3.474
3.232
1
0
3
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
1,041
1,053
998
931
94E
989
1,047
1,089
1,289
1,028
1,014
940
928
591
727
688
671
695
7U
817
860
,020
791
763
691
662
Average 14 35,74,424.54 5.359%5.434%4.684 1 1 1,023 749
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept V5.021Run Date !ei12n002 - 10:33
tt
lnvestment Type
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Distribution of lnvestments By Type
January 2001 through January 2002
Page 5
January
2001
February
2001
March
2001
Aprll
2001
January
2002
Average
by Perlod
JulyMay August Septombar2001 2001
October November December
2001 2001 200120012001
LAIF & County Pool 39.3 34.3 36.9 42.4 4.t.9 40.4 36.2 38,1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 39.6%
Certlficates of Deposit . Bank
Certlflcates of Deposit - S & L
Gertiflcates of Deposit-Thrift & Ln
Negotiable CD's - Bank
CORP NOTES 8.6 8.5 8.9 8.1 7.8 8.4 7.9 8.0 4.7 9.3 9.2 8.5 8,7 8.5%
Bankers Acceptances
Gommerclal Paper - lnterest Bearing
Commercial Paper - Dlscount
Federal Agency lssues .Coupon 52.1 57.3 54.2 49.5 50.3 51.3 55.9 53.9 64.4 49.1 48.4 44.9 49.2 51.9o/"
Federal Agency lssues - Discount
Treasury Securities - Coupon
Treasury Securities . Discount
Mlscellaneous Securities . Coupon
Mlscellaneous Securities . Discount
Non lnterest Bearing lnvestments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Gost 2
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMs) SymRept V5.02fRvn Oate'. 0a 1212002 - 1 0:33
June
2001
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnterest Earnings Summary
January 31,2002
January3l Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date
Page 6
CD/Coupon/Discount lnvestments:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Period
26,250.00
365,373.33
302,490.00)
0.00)
705,150.00
365,373.33
337,083.33)
0.00)
89,1 33.33
0.00
733,440.00
1,250,00
89,133.33 734,690.00
Pass Through Securitles:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Earned doring Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Eamings during Period
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
Cash/Ghecking Accounts:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
lnterest Earned during Period
u,085.27
316,919.03
352,762.70)
441,U7.29
316,919.03
425,720.11)
48,241.60 332,8/,6.21
Total lnterest Earned durlng Period
Total Capital Galns or Lossog
137,374.93
0.00
1,066,286.21
1,250.00
Total Earnings during Period 137,374.93 1,067,536.21
Run Date. ?,1122,002 -10:33
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMO) SymRept Vs.02f
((
((
(
(
(
(
((
lnveslments
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31,2002
Per Market
Value
Book
Value
c/o ol
Portfollo
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
360 Equiv.
YTM
365 Equlv.Value Term
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
800,000.00 802,000.00 100.00
802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 591
591
4.995
1,754 4.995 5.064
800,000.00 827,000.00 5.064
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Cunent Year 3,4.16.67
Average Daily Balance 8O2,0OO.OO
Effective Rate of Return S,O2%
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's
23,916.67
802,000.00
5.06%
expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
I
of these is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax,Trust & Agency funds, Capitral
2-l l-o L
Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Rahn Becker, Finance
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF-PM1 ) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date: 02/112002 . 12;39
827,000.00
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Average
Balance
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
January 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Markot Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Daysto
365 Malurlty
Page 2
Maturlty
Date
LAIF
79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD.
Subtotal and Average
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.707
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
Federal Agency lssues - Goupon
3133M5QB9 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average
802,000.00 5.125 5.064 591 09/15i2003
5.064 591
11124t1998 800,000.00 827,000.00
802,000.00 800,000.00 827,000.00 802,000.00
Total lnvestments and Average 802,000.00 80q,000.00 827,000.00 802,000.00 5,064 591
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate;02/1'112002 - 12:39
t
lnvestments
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
o/o oI
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM YTM
Value 360 Equlv, 365 Equlv,
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
1 ,710,000.00 1,779,460.20 418
418
5.977 6.060
1,7'10,000.00 1,779,460,20 1,710,000.00 100.00% 1,826 5.977 6.060
Total Earnings January31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Curent Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
8,874.05
1,710,000.00
6.11o/o
61,139.78
1,710,000.00
6.07%
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
availability some of is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
a-ll-oLI
RAHN BECKER,Director/Treasurer
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02f
Run Oate; 02/1 1/2002 . 12:39
Par
1,710,000.00 100.00 1,826
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Average
Balance
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
January 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
BookValue Rate MoodysMarket Value
YTM Days to
365 Maturlty
Page 2
Maturlty
Date
Managed Pool Accounts
80 LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124
Subtotal and
Federal Agency Goupon Securlties
3133M3XEO 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average
0.00 0.00
1,710,000.00
0.00
1,775,460.20
0.00
1 ,710,000.00 6.060
0.000 0
6.060 418 0312612003
6.060 418
03/2611 998
1,710,000.00 I,710,000.00 1,775,460.20 I,710,000.00
Total lnvestmenG and Averago {,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,779,460.20 1,710,000.00 6.060 418
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 02|11l?002 - 12i39
lnvestments Par
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
%ot
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM
350 Equlv.
YTM
385 Equlv.Value
Managed Pool Accounts
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
11,274,520.33
1 ,1 00,000.00
11,274,520.33
1,1 19,591.00
11,274,520.33
1,100,000.00
91.1 1
8.89
1
1,824
1
1,656
148
2.919
5.474
3.147
2.960
5.550
12,374,520.33 12,394,111.33 12,374,520.33 100.00%163 3.190
Total Earnings January 31 Month Endinq
Current Year 35,602.23
Average Daily Balance 12,563,09g.35
Effective Rate of Return 334%
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's
259,185.89
expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is
Gas Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
^
.,3-da_
Rahn A, Becker,Dir.ffreasurer
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02f
Run Oale:02113/2002 ' 10:33
Fiscal Year To Date
Average
Balance
O1 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
January 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM YTM Daysto
365 Maturlty
Page 2
Maturity
DateCUSIPlnvestment# lssuer 360
Managed Pool Accounts
81 Local Agency lnv. Fd
Subtotal and Average
08/09i2001 11,274,520.33 11,274,520.33 11,274,520.33 2.960 2.919 2.960
11,463,088.35 11,274,520.33 11,274,520.33 11,274,520.33 2.919 2.960
Federal Agency Goupon Securities
3133MGQR0 503 081151200'.1 1,100,000.00 1,1 19,591.00Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Average 1,100,000,00 1,100,000,00 1,119,591,00
1,100,000.00 5.550 5,474 5.550 1,656 08/15/2006
1,100,000.00 5.474 5.550 1,656
Total lnvestments and Average 12,563,088.35 12,374,520.33 12,394,111.33 12,374,s20.33 3.147 3.190 18
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:02113i?002 - 10:33
TEIS IiIONTE
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY JANUARY, 2OO2
SllTE UONTE
I.A8T YEAR
TEIS YEAR
IO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO D.trTEI,.A,ST UO!{TH
Peni! Eyt e
New single Family
New Multi-Family
Ne!, comnercial,
Alterationa-Res
Alterations -NonRes
Demolitlon
swirunlng Pool
sign PerniEs
Fences
ReroofLng
Repairs
windorv RepI
MiBcellaneous
* valuatLo[
0 $o
0 $0
1 $12. 000
27 $1, s50.8s0
9 sX1,280.34s
s $10.000
2 $25, s00
0 $0
0 $0
22 $309,335
9 $42,7OO
5 $16,806
10 $292,000
"rluaEioB
$o
$o
9o
9742,400
$39s,4s8
$o
$o
93, soo
$0
$100,250
12,2OO
$9,5s6
$98,800
valuatloD
i272 t L5O
$o
$2,000,000
$s44,900
$1,4s1,250
$12,000
$o
$15,0s3
$o
$x06,20e
$12,800
$38,999
$223 , 494
* valuatloE
0 $0
0 $0
1 $12,000
27 $1.s50,8s0
9 $11,280,34s
s $10,000
2 126 ,5OO
0 90
0 $0
22 $309,336
9 $42,7OO
s $15,806
10 $292,0OO
valuatLoB
$272 , LsO
$o
$2, ooo, ooo
$s44,900
$1,4s1,250
s12,000
$o
$15,0s3
$o
$106,209
$12,800
$38,9ee
s223 ,494
FISC}IJ YEAR
DATE
valuatLoE
$2,510,000
$o
s10, 112, oo0
$7,1s9,559
$15,19s,2s3
$49,000
$48,500
$40,82s
$6,700
1L , 8L9 ,223
$50,8oo
i24S , 667
$903 ,229
*
0
o
0
18
3
1
0
1
0
13
1
3
8
#
1
0
1
2r
10
3
o
5
o
11
3
4
15
#
1
0
1
10
3
0
0
11
4
15
*
6
0
5
767
39
3
10
154
L7
35
52
TOTArJS......90 $13,550,537 48 5L,352,274 74 $4,677,A55 90 S13,550,537 74 14,677,A55 524 S39,2s3,856
2/01-/02 1o:30:28
CITY OF BARUNGAME BAILDING INSPECTION