HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.04.15BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rncur,.qn MBBtrNc - MoNony, Arrul 15, 2W2
PAGE 1 or2
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO TIIE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Budget meeting of March 28,2OO2 and Regular
meeting of April 1,2W2
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may timit speakcrc to three minutes each
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council.
The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits
council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of
council to refer such matters to stafffor investigation and/or action. Speakers are
requested to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and
hand it to staff. The Mayor may limil speakers to three minutes each.
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUIYICATIONS
a. Presentation on League of California Grassroots Network
b. Authorize Retention of Advocation, Inc. to Provide Lobbying
Services Regarding AB 680 on Behalf of the City of Burlingame
and other Peninsula Cities
c. Appoint Planning Commissioners
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Purchase by Burlingame Fire Department of new fire engine
from Pierce Manufacturing
b. Request for Full-Time Parking Enforcement Officer (PEO)
position for Police Department
c. Resolution Regulating Parking at City Licensed Property at the
corner of Marsten Road & Rollins Road and Authorizing the
Towing of Non-Authorized Vehicles
d. Warrants and Payroll, March,2O02
9. COI.]NCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Ctty of Burlingame
CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O
(650) 558-7200
SUGGESTED ACTION
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Approval
Presentation
Approval
Appoint
Approval
BTJRLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rncur,an MrrtrNc - Momoay, Arrul 15, 2002
PlcB2 or2
a. Library Board of Trustees Minutes of February 19,2A02;
Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission Minutes of March 14,
2002; Planning Commission of April 8,2002
b. Department Reports: Building, March, 2002; Finance, March,
2002
c. Letters from residents concerning Safeway expansion
d. Email from Jane Gomery concerning Broadway Streetscape
e. Email from Broadway Auto Body & reply from Frank Erbacher
concerning parking at 1305 No. Carolan
f. 2001 Pomeroy Award from the California Water Environment
Association Award to Phil Scott
g. Memorandum from Public Works Director concerning recent
301 Airport Boulevard Site Activities
h. Letter from Dan Rados, 2315 Poppy Drive, supporting City
Council's decision to hold interviews for the two Planning
Commission positions
13. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650)
558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy ofthe Agenda Packet is available for public review
at the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting
and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at rvww.burlingqnc.org. Agendas and minutes are
available at this site.
NBXT MEETING - April 24,2002
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMBOSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O
(650) 558-7200
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
March 28,2002
1. STUDY MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A budget study meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the Lane
Community Room, Burlingame Library. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Mary
Janney.
2. ROLL CAI,L
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
None
3. 2002/03 Budeet Financial Plannine
The following items were discussed by city staff regarding the 2002103 budget:
a. Review plans to balance current and new years budgets
b. Review impacts of budget planning on capital improvement program
c. Review plans to fund water and sewer infrastructure upgrades
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Andy Wu, Paloma Avenue, and John Root, Burlingame Chamber of Commerce, thanked staff and
council for the comprehensive budget presentation.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m.
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
1 March 28,2002
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
April 1,2002
1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Charnbers. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Vice Mayor Coffey.
2, PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Ross Bruce.
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, O'Mahony
Janney
4, MINUTES
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of March 18,2002; seconded by
Councilman Galligan, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Mayor Janney absent.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
6, PUBLIC COMMENTS
Randy Vandenbrink, L412 Alvarado, and Deborah Cody, 1416 Alvarado, both spoke regarding
construction hours on weekends.
CA Anderson reported that the Council met in closed session and instructed him on how to proceed on
the following three items:
a. Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(bX1), (3Xc)) Sally and Frank Chambers
b. Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(b)(1), (3)(c)) Zeka Group
c. One personnel matter (Government Code $ 54957)
Burlingame City Council
Unapploved Minutes
1 April 1,2002
a
7, STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Commissioner Term Expirations (Librarv Board)
CM Nantell referred to staff report dated March 27 ,2002; noted there are two library commissioner
positions that will expire on June 30,2002; explained three options on how to proceed filling the two
positions.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to use the current council policy as reflected in the 1994 Council
Resolution 2l-94 and establish a filing deadline of Friday, May 3, 2002, for accepting library board
trustee applications; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Mayor
Janney absent.
Vice Mayor Coffey noted the interview committee would consist of Councilwoman O'Mahony and
himself.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Apnrove 2007102 Annual Renort and Resolution of Intention: Broadwav Area
8
a
c
Business Improvement District - Setting 2002/03 Assessments
ACM Becker requested council adopt Resolution of Intention and set public hearing.
b. Resolution Authorizins Director of Public Works to Accept the Grant Deed for a Sanitary
Sewer Easement at 1010 Cadillac Way
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #34-2002 authorizing the Director of Public
Works to accept the grant deed for the sanitary sewer easement at 1010 Cadillac Way.
Resolution Awarding Traffic Sisnal Proiect at California Drive/Carmelita & California
Drive/Morrell Avenue to Mike Brown Electric Companv
DPW Bagdon recommended council approve Resolution #33-2002 awarding the traffic signal project
at Califomia Drive/Carmelita Avenue and California Drive/Morrell Avenue to Mike Brown Electric
Company in the amount of $203,700.
d. Resolution Awardins Cali Drive Resurfacing Proiect
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #32-2002 awarding the resurfacing project to
Top Grade Construction, Inc. in the amount of $669,797. It is also recommended that staff be
authorized to issue change orders up to 45o/o of the construction work.
e.Weeds and Rubbish Abatement on Private Property
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #31-2002 setting a public hearing for May
20,2002, for the 2002 Weed and Rubbish Abatement Program on public and private property.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes2
April 1, 2002
f. Resolution to Support State Legislation Regarding Bav Area Resional Water Financing and
Supply
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #38-2002 supporting Senate Bill 1870, the
Bay Area Water Reliability Financing Authority Act and Resolution #39-2002, supporling Assembly
Bill 2058, the Bay Area Regional Water Supply and Conservation Agency Act.
g. Resolution Authorizins Submittal of Grant Request to Promgte Beverage Container
Recycline
ACM Becker recommended Council approve Resolution #37 -2002 approving the submittal of a
funding request to the State Department of Conservation for a grant to promote beverage container
recycling and litter cleanup, and authorizing the South Bayside Waste Management Authority to
complete all necessary forms, implement program and provide information to the Deparlment of
Conservation upon request; also, transfer 51,922.98 of prior year Burlingame beverage container grant
funds to the SBWMA to be combined with this program.
h. Resolution Authorizing Agreemept for Construction and Demolition Recvcling
Administration Services with J.Edwards & Associates. Inc.
ACM recommended council approve Resolution #36-2002 authorizing agreement for construction and
demolition recycling administration services with J. Edwards & Associates, Inc.
9, COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City.
10. ol,p BUSINESS
I1. NEW BUSINESS
t2. ACKII_OWLEpGEMENTS
a, Commission Minutes: Beautification of March7,2002; Parks & Recreation of March2l,2002;
Planning of March 25,2002
b. Deparlment Reports: Police, February, 2002; Building, February,2002
c. Letter fi'om Ruthellen Rosenberger, 1109 Dufferin conceming parking problems
d. Letters & Email from residents concerning Planning Commission appointments
e. Letter from Stephen & Fiona Hamilton, 105 Crescent, concerning the selection process of
Commissioners
f. Email of March 18th from Zita Escobosa, 15 16 Adeline concerning fireworks at Ray Park
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
3 April 1,2002
o Email of March 13th from Rosemary Rivas concerning list of historical buildings in Burlingarne
13. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Coffey adjourned the meeting al7:26 p.m. in memory of Mrs. Kay Amstrup, beloved wife
of former mayor Irving Amstrup.
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes4
ApLil 1,2002
STAFF REPORT
AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
AGENDA
ITEM #7a
MTG.
DATE 4-1 5-02
TO:HONORABLE
BY
DArE: April 10,2002
FRoM: Jim Nantell City Manager
650-558-7205
BY
suBJECT: Presentation on League of California Grassroots Network
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council receive a report from Rebecca Elliot, Califomia League of Cities
Regional representative, regarding community grassroots effort to involve communities in protecting local
revenue and local control for local government.
BACKGROUND: As a result of the state government-established trend to increase mandates on local
government, reduce local control on core responsibilities such as land use, and take away local revenues, the
League of California Cities has been working to set a new course that will increase the ability of a local
government to influence and impact the decisions being made at the state level. For many of us, one of the
biggest risks to the future of local govemment's ability to meet the needs of our community residents is the
misguided actions that are undertaken at the state level. As you know, so many of those actions that impact us
at the local level are often driven by a special interest that is able to influence the decisions through major
financial contributions or political clout.
For some time, many state legislators have been candid that the practical reality is that local govemment has
little or no impact at the state level because of our inability to "make them pay''if they don't respond to the
interest that we raise. Although it may seem harsh to some, it seems to be a practical reality. Given that
reality last year the League of California Cities formed the grassroots coordinator and network for the purpose
of working with city officials and regional divisions of the League to aggressively promote key League
legislative priorities with legislators, district staff, local media, and other supporting community organizations.
Rebbeca Elliot will be joining us for the City Council meeting to discuss her role as a regional coordinator for
this most important undertaking.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Grassroots Network Overview
B. Grassroots Network Frequently Asked Questions
C. The Proposed League Bylaws Changes that were approved last year by our City Council as well as the
vast majority of League City memberships.
C :\TEMP\League Grassroots Effort.doc
L--
lr.
N
Oueruieu
Pumose
City officials have experienced deep frustration in recent years as the state government has amassed more resources and
power at the expense of local govemment seMces.The League has a solid reputation as an advocate of city interests, but in
the new era of term limits, traditional lobbying methods are often a poor match for grassroots campaigns and financial
contributions by other competing interests. Many organizations have already responded to the new political reality in Sacra-
mento by investing in a sfronger grassroots organ2ation, including the powefful education lobby, whidr recently launched a
new, high profile and well-funded grassroots organization called EdVoice.The League now has to respond in kind to this new
climate by building a solid grassroots network to coordinate city officials'efforts locally to influence legislators, heir staff,
potentially helpful community groups, and the news media.
Maior Elements
The Network would consist of 1 0 field offices that would be staffed by 14 new and 3 existing staff (1 5 coordinators/2 support).
The coordinators would work with city officials and he regionaldivisions of he League to promote key League legislative
priorities with legislators, district staff, local media and other supporting community groups. They would arange meetings,
plan news conferences, organize letter writing and media campaigns, and coordinate grassroots efforts with community
groups with similar agendas. ln short, they would increase the impact of the League's 16 regional divisions and he already
busy city officials in each division on the state legislature's and govemo/s decisions atfecting cities.
Cost
The Network would cost cities an additional $1.6 million each year in dues.This is tre equivalent of four one hundredths of
one percent (0.04%) of the $3.8 billion cilies collect each year in sales and use taxes, and about one tenth of one percent of
the $1.57 billion cities receive each year in VLF revenues. Most observers believe both revenue sources could become
victims of legislative raids in the next recession. lndMdualcity costs forfte Network willvary depending on city population. For
example, a city of 50,001 to 60,000 population would pay an additional $4,643. Such a dues increase will require amendment
of the League bylaws approved by no less than 23 of the rcting League membership.
Membership Review
The idea of the Grassroots Network originated with he City Managers Departnent and was more fully developed by a
specialTask Force appointed by the League board of directors. lnformation on he program was developed and disseminated
to the full League leadership ( board, dMsions, departments, policy committees and caucuses), as well as to every city
manager. Dozens of presentations on the proposalwere made to each League divlsion, many deparfinents, and to most of
the area city manager groups throughout the state.
Accountability to the Membership
Based upon membership input, the Task Force recommended, and the board adopted, significant changes to the original
proposal. These include: establishing longterm goals, annual program objec{ives, and regular reports to the membership; an
unbiased, professional evaluation three times during the first five years;and a lote of the membership after five years to
continue the program. Under the League's cunent bylaws, the board may also vote to discontinue the Grassroots Network at
any time.
Next Steps
Cities are now asked to vote to approve the addltion of article XVI to the League's bylaws relating to the establishment of the
Grassroots Network, along with a new increased dues schedule to pay for the progrcm. A ballot will be sent to eacfi city.
Ballots retumed to the League must be postmarked no later than July 6, 2001.
Revised 05/07/01
r
.eaqur, ot {di[urnia iitrii Grassroots Nenvork
Frequentb As ked Questiorus
What is the Grassroots Coordinator Network?
The Grassroots Coordinator Network would consist of 10 field otfices staffed by 14 new and 3 existing staff who
would serve as grassroots coordinators. Their job would be to work with city officials and the regionaldivisions of
the League to aggressively promote key League legislative priorities with legislators, district staff, local media and
other supporting community groups.
Why do we need a Grassroots Network?
The Network proposal was developed by a task force (see page 4 tor a list of task force members) authorized by the
League Board of Directors as part of its strategic planning process. lt responds to the deep frustration of many
local officials about the cities'loss of political clout, compared with other, better-positioned interest groups that
contribute millions of dollars to campaigns.
The concept of establishing local field offices is used very successfully by political campaigns, as well as by teach-
ers, labor and other statewide membership organizations. These groups find that a network of field offices is a well-
tested means to communicate with a dispersed membership, and to mobilize local support for the organization's
causes. A recent survey by researchers at Wake Forest University found that key congressional staff,hs well as
government and public affairs executives, ranked grassroots activities as more effective in influencing the outcome
of legislation than corporate or contract lobbying, campaign contributions or advocacy advertising. California's
powerfuleducation lobby must agree: they recently launched a neq high profile and well-funded grassroots
organization called EdVoice. These are the interests against which the League must compete in Sacramento.
How will cities benefit from this proposal?
The goal of the Grassroots Network is to focus on major issues of concern to all cities, such as fiscal reform,
increased funding for transportation and local control. Cities will benefit from the increased visibility of city issues in
local and statewide media, and by holding legislators accountable back home for the votes they cast in Sacramento.
The potential payback for this investment is enormous. For example, on a statewide basis the proposed $1.6 million
dues increase needed to pay for the network is equivalent to only four one hundredths of one percent (0.0a%) of
the annual $3.4 miltion cities receive in sales and use taxes. lt is one tenth of one percent of the $i.57 bittion
cities receive each year in VLF revenues. Portions ol both VLF and sales and use tax revenues are at risk from
legislative raids if the state suffers another recession.
The costs are also relatively smallwhen compared to the expenditures made by organizations that compete with
cities and the League for the allocation of dollars in Sacramento. For example, the 1999-2000 legislative session
just two of the statewide public employee unionsl that sponsored or lobbied for SB 402 (the binding arbitration bill)
reported spending about $3.1 million in campaign contributions to legislators, candidates for statewide office or
Page2ol 4
current stalewide of{ice holders, in addition to their expendhures lor in-house or contract lobbying. During the same
period, the Calilomia Teachers Association, which competes very elfectively tor funding in Sacramento, reported
spending approximatety $2.7 mitlion on lobbying expenses on education issues. ln the same period, the CTA also
spent approximately $6.3 million on campaign contributions to legislators, candidates for statewide otlice and
cunent statewide otfice holders, and $35.2 million on initiative campaigns to furlher advance their policy agenda.
I
I
What would the g rassroots coordinatoni do?
The coordinators role is to increase the impact of the League's 16 regional divisions, by helping busy city officials
focus strategic attention on state legislators'and the governoFs decisions affecting cities. The coordinators will work
to build relationships with local elected and appointed oflicials, local media, and other individuals and organizations
in the region who might be called upon to be part ol a local coalition on a particular League initiative or pending
legislation.
The coordinators' would:
Arrange meetings lor city officials with legislators, plan news conferences, organize letter writing and media
campaigns, and coordinate grassroots efforts with community groups with similar agendas.
Support mayors, council members and city managers in dratting sample letters trom cities; and train city stafl on
understanding and accessing the legislative process.
Provide regular presentations on legislative developments and insight into the political dynamics influencing
legislative developments.
Meet regularly with legislative staff, media representatives and community groups about the League's legislative
priorities.
What kind of person will be hired to staff the Network?
Everyone associated with this project has concluded that the best way to make this Network eflective is to hire
seasoned, prolessional, political organizers, not policy analysts or technical people right out of college. The budget
provides an attractive salary and benefit package to do this. ln addition to reassigning some League staff, we,
expect to recruii sawy political people who have worked on legislative or local elections, statled legislative offices,
or worked in public affairs or campaign consulting firms.
Where will the field offices be located?
The 10 field offices would be localed around the state to ensure lhat coordinators are available to serve each o, the
League's 16 geographic divisions, while still balancing the need to maintain close contact with legislative districts
and to be accessible to all cities. A map of the distribution by region is available in the information pac*et developed
by the League.The League will send out Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to solicit interest by cities in hosting a
coordinator.The goal will be to achieve the highest impact on League lobbying and grealest visibility among mem-
bers, while still keeping expenses as low as possible.
Page 3 of 4
How does the Network relate to the ABC etfort?
Action for Better Cities was crealed to make expenditures and engage in 'political' activities such as slatewide
initiative campaigns. Recently, through in-kind contributions of staff time and strategic counsel, ABC was able to
play a major role in helping to deleat Proposition 37, the initiative that would have severely limited cities' abilities to
impose fees to support local regulatory activities and provide seMces. \A/hile both the proposed Network and ABC
shari a similar objective, namely to gain more political clout for cities, the Network coordinators will focus on
organizing local activities in support of League legislative positions. ABC will lead any initiative effort in support of
fiscal stability and similar obiectives.
Our city already pays a lobbyist. Why do we need this network too?
The Network doesn't replace the ongoing need to have a strong lobbying presence in Sacramento. (ln fact, part o{
the task lorce recommendation which has been approved by the League Board of Directors is to set aside at least
$50,000iyear in the budget to hire contract lobbyists in Sacramento to assist League statf at strategic times on
some key issues.) Cities that cunently have their own contract or in-house lobbyist will probably continue to find
that having their own representalion makes sense, for two reasons.
First, the League's lobbying program represents the interests of all476 cities. lt lobbies the legislature on matters ol
statewide importance to cities, and cannot provide the representation needed to address the individual needs of
cilies or even a single region. Second, the grassroots coordinators will be networking and organizing people, not
lobbyists. This work will support and enhance the etforts ol all city lobbyists, regardless of whether they are con-
tractors or in-house statf. Several prominent mntracl lobbyists who represent individual cities have commented that
they see the network proposal as complementary to their ability to represent their clients.
What criteria will be used to measure the Network's effectiveness?
The League board specified that, if the Network were approved by the membership, the board would set both long-
term goals and annualized objectives for the program and report them to the membership. The board also required
that the League engage the services of a consultant to conduct a proiessional membership survey that establishes
a base line of information about city officials' perceptions o, the eflectiveness of the League's legislative advocacy
efforts and the relative level of involvement of city otficials in support of that advocacy work. The board's intention is
to repeat that survey at the end of year three and following year five, comparing changing attitudes and levels of
efforts.
How wil! the League be held accountable for the Network's success or failure?
ln addition to the survey to assess members' perceptions and actual involvement in grassroots activities, the board
also directed the stafl lo (1) establish a separate Grassroots Network account in the League budget, so that mem-
bers can track Network expenses; (2) publish an annual legislative voting records report, including a ranking of
legislators and the Governor on key city issues; (3) report board goals and annual legislative and policy objectives
to the membership; (4) provide regular reports at the Executive Forum, Annual Conference and League deparlment
and division meetings; and (5) provide periodic reports to the membership.
Willthis new program have a sunset date?
On or before the end of the sixth year of the program (December 31, 2007), the board will ask the membership to
vote on the question of continuing the program. li the membership votes against the program continuation, the
Network would be shut down, and cease operations by no later than the end of the seventh year (December 31 ,
2008).
Page 4 of 4
What will it cost?
The estimated annualized cost is $1.6 million, spread among all member cities. This estimate is based upon the
followin g assumplions:
Several cunent League staff members will be reassigned. Approximately 14 new statl will be hired.
Much of the cost for the individual otfices will be subsidized by the cities where the otfice is located, for ex-
ample, by making office space and support slaff available within a city facility.
How will costs be distributed?
Costs would be distributed among all cities based upon the League's dues structure, which is based on population.
Some small cities pay only a lew hundred dollars, while the largest cities pay tens ol thousands of dollars. The
median dues statewide are cunently about $4,930. The Network would increase median dues by approximately
$2,588.,
When would a dues increase start?
ll the membership votes to approve the bylaw amendment the proposed dues increase would be effective on July 1,
2001.
Grassroots Lobbying Task Force
Haniet Miller, Mayor, Santa Baban - Chair
John Thompson, City Manager, Vacaille, and President ol the CW Managers' Department - Vice Chair
Eileen Ansari, Council Member, Diamond Bat
Harry Armstrong, Council Member, Clovis
Lee Ann Garcia, Council Member, Grand Temce
Tom Haas, City Attomey, Walnut Creek
Jim Marshall, City Manager, Merced
Patsy Marshall, Council Member, Buena Pa*
Dave Mora, City Manager, Salinas
Kevin O'Rourke, Cig Manager, Faifield
Susan Peppler, Council Member, Redlands
Greg Pettis, Council Member, Cathedral City
Mike Siminski, Council Member, Lompoc
Armour Smith, Vice Mayor, Modesto
Anne Solem, Council Member, MillValley
Richard Teiank, Former Chief of Police, Buena Park
Ruth Vreeland, Council Member, Montercy
Endnote
1 The California Professional Firefighters Association and lhe Police Offcers Research Association of Califomia
2 For purposes of establishing the grassroots network, the $5,000 dues cap in League bylaws article lV section 2, is would be
suspended for the years 2001 and 2002. The dues cap will apply to base dues without intenuption and will apply lo total dues in year
2003 and years following.
Attachment A:
Proposed Addition to League Bylaws
Article XVI: Establishment and Financing of
Grassroots Network
Section 1: Enhancement of Advocacy Efforts.
To enhance the League's advocacy efforts on behalf of cities, the League hereby
establishes a Grassroots Network. The Grassroots Network consists of a series of field
offices throughout Califomia, responsible for coordinating city advocacy efforts and
promoting statewide League policy priorities.
Section 2: Dues lncrease
(a) lnitial Financing. The dues increase approved concunently with the addition
of Article XVI shall finance the League's Grassroots Network for the second half
of 2OO1 and for 2002. The increase shall be used exclusively to finance the
Grassroots Network.
(b) Continued Financing.., Any subsequent dues increases shall occur in
accordance with Article lV.
Section 3: Accountability
(a) Annual Goal-Setting and Performance Assessment The League Board
shall set long-term goals and annual objectives for the League's Grassroots
Network. The League Board shall periodically report to the League's Member
Cities on the Grassroots Netwok's performance in meeting those goals and
objectives.
(b) Board Discontinuance. lf at any time the League Board finds the
Grassroots Network is not meeting its objectives on behalf of cities, the League
Board may discontinue the Grassroots Network.
(c) Membership Vote on Program Gontinuation. On or before December 31,
2007, the Board shall ask Member Cities to vote on whether to continue the
Grassroots Network beyond December 3'1, 2OO8-2
1 Explanatory Noter'Article Nf is the existing section ofthe League's bylaws, which provide for 1) a
tlvo-thirds vote of approval by the League board for all dues increases as well as 2) division ratification of dues
increases in excess ofthe Consumer Price lndex. Article lV also caps individual city dues increases at $5,000
per year.
2 The League's bylaws provide that a majority of votes cast is necessary for decision on League votes
See Article Xll, S 4.
Attachment B:
Proposed Dues to Establish the Grassroots Network
For purposes of establishing the grassroots network, the $5,000 dues cap in League bylaws article lV, section 2, is
suspended for the years 2001 and 2002. The dues cap will apply to base dues without intenuption and will apply
to total dues in year 2003 and years following.
The League board will consider in September whether a cost-of-living adjustment for dues will be needed in 2002.
This table shows 2002 dues with a cost-of-living adjustment of 4%.
Base
Dues
Paid in
2001For cities of:
Base
Dues for
2002
(Est)
lA+ 4yo1
1
501
601
701
801
901
1,001
1,251
1,501
1,751
2,001
2,251
2,501
2,751
3,001
4,001
5,001
7,501
10,001
15,001
20,001
25,001
30,001
40,001
50,001
60,001
70,001
80,001
90,001
100,001
125,001
150,001
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,750
2,000
2,250
2,5s0
2,750
3,000
4,000
5,000
7,500
10,000
1s,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
125,000
150,000
200,000
500,000
640,000
000
$37
99
197
2',t6
259
317
494
611
727
865
921
1,020
1,078
1,176
1,3'r6
1,570
2,044
2,359
2,U8
3,279
4,'t05
4,930
6,068
7,382
8,504
9,346
9,817
10,&4
113U
'13,075
14,392
'16,357
17,176
819
$39
103
205
225
269
330
514
635
756
900
958
1,061
1,122
1,223
1,369
1,633
2j25
2,453
2,%1
3,411
4,269
5,127
6,311
7,677
8,844
9,720
10,210
10,883
11,923
13,598
14,968
17,O11
17,863
8s2
,o28
Total Dues
lncluding
Grassroots
Network
2002 (Est)
lc+Dl
$59
157
312
u2
410
503
7U
969
1,152
1,373
1,461
1,618
1,710
1,865
2,088
2,490
3,241
3,741
4,516
5,201
6,511
7,818
9,624
11,708
13,87
14,823
15,570
16,597
18j82
20,737
22,826
25,942
27,241
1,299
66,125
1,201
393
200,001
500,001
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Plus
Plus
per each full 10,000 of population
41,6e3 I -'.i0,544:l +a,gor
7st l, ,ls9l 787
Over
per each full 000 ot
51,950
over
over oo1
13o
'16!
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: March 112002
FRoM: Jim Nantelt City Manager
650-5s8-7205
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
7b
4-l 5-02
SUBMITTED /1*"ffiLBY
BY
suBJECT: Authorize Retention of Advocationr lnc. to Provide Lobbying Services Regarding AB 680 on
Behatf of the City of Burlingame and Other Peninsula Cities
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council authorize the City Manager to retain Advocation, Inc. to provide
lobbying services regarding AB 680 on behalf of the City of Burlingame and other Peninsula cities.
BACKGROUND: AB 680 is controversial bill that would redistribute sales tax within the Sacramento region
and would effectively serve as the beginning of the end of the distribution of sales tax back to local
jurisdictions without any strings attached. The League of California Cities has been providing leadership to
help focus our legislative efforts to defeat this legislation that could be disastrous to the City of Burlingame.
San Mateo County cities have agreed that AB 680 is a dangerous precedent and requires an unusual proactive
response from us. Therefore, the San Mateo County City Manager's Association has selected an experienced
lobbyist--Advocation, Inc.--to work for a joint group of cities in the county to help defeat or amend this bill.
Currently the cities of Daly City, San Carlos, San Mateo and hopefully Burlingame have agreed to share the
expense of this lobbyist services. Although we expect other cities to join in, with four cities involved the
monthly cost to each city would be $1,600 per city.
DISCUSSION: As the Council knows, traditionally our second largest source of revenue to the City of
Burlingame comes from the distribution of sales tax. At this point in the current fiscal year, with the
projected loss of $6-7 million of anticipated hotel tax revenue, sales tax revenue is our single highest source of
revenue, which this year was projected to be over $10 million.
What is most distressing about AB 680 (and other similar bills) is that the state is attempting to take away
local dollars and give some of it back with strings attached. That allows the Legislature to set the agenda and
the priorities for local govemments. As you know, ten years ago, to help bridge a $14 billion state budget gap
in1991-92, lawmakers created the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF), a measure dedicating a
large portion of local property taxes to pay for public schools, thus relieving the state of the burden. That shift
of local revenues resulted in a loss of $1 million annually to the City of Burlingame revenues.
Simply stated, AB 680 takes the one cent for every sales tax dollar that currently goes to the local government
where the sales was generated and redistributes one-third of the growth to cities on a per capita formula, one-
third to cities to create open space and affordable housing, and one-third to cities based on the locale where the
sales occurred.
For the City Burlingame, which currently enjoys a relatively high amount of sales tax revenue per capita
compared to other cities, the change that would give all cities in the county an equal per capita share of our
sales tax growth, thus dramatically decreasing our sales tax revenue. In addition, the proposed change would
direct a third to the City Burlingame, only if we agree to spend it on affordable housing and more open space.
Although it would go to worthy causes, it would take away existing revenue that currently funds basic general
fund services, including police, fire, public works, libraries, and parks and recreation without any means to
replace it. In our case, our sales tax consultants have projected that this proposed change, should it be applied
statewide in the future, would likely reduce the money for existing Burlingame services by $a to $5 million
over ten years. In San Mateo County, the loss over the same period would be about $24 million. In today's
dollars if this were to occur, the state would have taken away about 2% ($500,000 of $30 million) of the City's
general fund revenues while at the same time continuing to increase demands on cities to cover mandated
services. This loss is the equivalent to the annual cost of four police officers or firefighters.
SUMMARY OF KEY CONCERNS ABOUT AB 680
AB 680's reallocation of sales tax revenues for the Sacramento region sets a dangerous precedent for all
cities. For the first time, sales tax distribution will be taken over by the state, undermining local control of
sales tax dollars.
AB 680 puts fire, police and other essential services needs at risk. It jeopardrzes the ability of cities to fund
service needs of a rapidly expanding population.
City officials deeply distrust the state's motives for reforming the local share of sales tax. The state could
achieve the same policy goals by redistributing its own share of sales tax.
Local governments cannot single-handedly solve the state's pressing need for affordable housing. The
state is quick to cut funding that would create incentives to build more housing, whenever state revenues
are declining.
We need to stabilize local revenues before finding alternatives to fund housing and other needs. The state
created the situation that forces cities to try to maximize sales taxes and other revenues. The state should
sponsor a constitutional amendment that will stabilize local revenues.
Constitutional protection for local revenues would give cities a stable predictable revenue source, which
would allow them to engage in thoughtful, long-term planning.
The state has already taken the property taxes and threatened the Vehicle License Fee revenues. Now they
want to take the sales taxes as well. Cities cannot afford to lose any more revenue and continue to provide
essential services to their residents.
ATTACHMENTS: Fair Political Practices Commission Form 602
o
a
a
a
Lobbying Firm
Activity Authorization FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM.
CALIFORNIA
FORM
Filing Requirements:
A Form 602 (Lobbying Finn Activity Authorization)
must be completed and verified by each person who
employs or contracts with a lobbying firm.
The Form 602 must be attached to the lobbying firm's
Form 601 (Registration Statement) or, when adding a new
client or employer to the firm's existing registration, to
Form 605 (Amendment to Registration).
The person who employs the lobbying firm must date and
sign the verification. In the case of a business entity or
organization, the verification must be signed by a
responsible officer of the entity or organization or by an
attorney or a certified public accountant who acts as an
agent for the entity or organization.
Lobbying Firms that Subcontract a Client:
A lobbying firm that subcontracts to provide lobbying
services to clients of another lobbying firm must identify
the subcontracting lobbying firm and the client(s) on
whose behalf it will lobby. A Forrn 602 signed by a
representative of the subcontracting lobbying firm must
be included with the contracted firm's registration. The
subcontracted client is not required to file a Form 602. In
addition, it is not necessary to complete the Nature and
Interests section for subcontract clients.
Additional Information
Refer to the Lobbying Disclosure lnformation Manual for
additional information and information required to be
provided to you pursuant to the Infonnation Practices Act
of 1977.
FppC Form 602 (7/98)
For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660
602
Lobbying Firm
Activity Authorization
(Govemnrent Code Section 86104)
Check one box, if applicable
[] Lobbyist Employer
(Gov. Code Section 82039.5)
fl Lobbying Coalition
(FPPC Regulation t8616.4)
Type or Print in Ink
NAME OF FILER:
City of Burlingame
BUSINESS ADDRESS: (Number and Street)
501 Primrose Road
than above.)
(Srate)(Zip Code)r 650
NUMBER:
558-7204
Burli ame cA 94010
Advocation, lnc.
NUMBER: (Optional)
1 650-. ) 342-8386
I hereby authorize
Legislative Session
(Insert Years)
Page- of
-
For Official Use Only
FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM.
(Name of Lobbying Firm)
1121 L Street. Suite 610, Sac ramento, CA 9581 4
(Business Address)
to engage in the activities of a lobbying firm (as defined in California Government Code Section
82038.5 and 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 1S238.5) on behalf of the above named employer.
If you are authorizing another lobbying firm to lobby on behalf of your firm's client(s), provide the name(s) of
the client(s) below. (It is not necessary to complete the Nature and Interests section.)
NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLIENT:NAME OF SUBCONTI{ACTED CLIENT:
NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLIENT:NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLTENT:
VERIFICATION
I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this Statement. I have reviewed this Statement and to the best of my
knowledge the information contained herein is true and complete.
I certify under penalty ofperjury under the laws ofthe State ofCatifornia that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE SIGNATURE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICER
James Nantel City Mana qerName of Responsible Offrcer
PRINTOR TYPE
By
Title
FPPC Form 602 (7/98)
For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660
602CALIFORNIA
FORM
Lobbying Firm
Activity Authorization
SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE
of Burlin me
Nature and Interests of Lobbyist Employer
Check aze box only:
[ ruotvtouAl (complete I nusrNess ENTrry n
- only Parts A and E) - (Complete only Parts B -
and E)
Type or Print in Ink
TNDUSTRY, TRADE OR
PROFESSIONAL ASSN.
(Complete only Parts C and E)
I Oruenle.g.,lobbying
coalition) (Complete only
Parts D and E)
Page
-
of
-
602CALIFORN!A
FORM
A.Individual
l. Name and address olemployer (or principal place of business if
self-employed):
Description of business activity in which you or your employer are
engaged:
Description of business activity in which engaged:
C. Industry,'li'ade or Prot-essional 2. Specific description ofany
profession which the assoc,
portion or faction ofthe industry trade, or
iation exlusively or primarily represents:l. Description of industry trade or profession represented:
3 . Number of mernbers in association (check appropriate box)
n ,O OR LESS (provide names of all nrembers on an atrachment.)! r'ronr rHAN 50
D.0ther
l. Statement ofnature and purposes:
City of 29,000 on San Francisco peninsulain San MateolCounty
2. Description of any trade, profession, or other group with a common
economic interest which is principally represented or from which
rnembership or financial supporr is principally derived:
E. Industry Group Classification
Check one box which most accurately describes the industry group which you represent. See instructions on reverse.
I lcntcvuuno | rcc,lt BUsl /Ess (checkoneof thefollowingsub-categories.)
I eoucertoN I ruaucturtoyEEs EeNIenIaINMENT/RECREATIoN I orr.ANDGAs
tr covERNMENT A pourrcAL oRGANrzArroNS ! :T*E/INSURANCE ! rnorassloNAlirRADE
ll r-oocrNcnesTAr.JRANTS I nralesrnre
I nunn I wrurues flruam-recruRrNc/rNDusrRrAl [ ,**..oRTArroN
fl oruen,
(Specific Description)
FPPC Form 602 (7/98)
For Technical Assistance: 9i6/322-5660
I utoonuNroNs I oraon.
(Describe in detail)
! rwancHeNDrsvRETArL
FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM.
Instructions for Nature and
Interests of Lobbyist Employer
FAIR POLITICAL PRACT'CES COMM
CALIFORNIA
FORM
Nature and Interests of Lobbyist Employer:
Check the box that indicates whetheryou are an individual, a business
entity. an industry, trade or professional association, or some other
type of entity, such as a lobbying coalition, a religious organization,
a political or public interest organization, or a recreational club.
Complete Part A, B, C, or D, whichever is applicable, and then
complete Part E.
Industry Group Classification
All filers must complete Section E. Check one box that most
accurately describes the industry group you represent. Industry,
trade, or professional associations should check the box that most
accurately describes the industry group of its mernbers (e.g., an
association of hospitals would be classified as "Health," and an
association of mortgage banking entities would be classifred as
"Business-Finance/Insurance"). Following are some additional
examples:
Agricalture: Includes growers, ranches, vineyards, flower
growers, fertilizer manufacfurers, etc.
Educatiott: Includes educators, private and public schools, and
education unions.
Governmenl: Includes cities, counties, and all other publicly-
funded agencies.
Heahlt: Includes physicians, dentists, optometrists, chiroprac-
tors, nurses, etc., as well as ambulance companies, convalescent
homes, pharmacists, pharmaceutical manufacturers, therapists,
hospitals, etc.
Labor Unions.' Does not include public employee and education
unions.
Legal: Includes attorneys and attorney associations, except
those representing public employee attomeys.
Political Organizations: Includes political committees and
clubs.
Puhlic Employees: Includes all public employee associations,
organizations, and unions (except education unions), including
district attomeys, public defenders, firefighters, judges, police,
sheriffs, etc.
Utilities: Includes telephone, power, and water companies.
Other: Describe. (After reviewing your description, the
Secretary of State may place you in one of the classifications
described above or assign you to the miscellaneous category in
the Directory of Lobbyists, Lobbying Firms and Lobbyist
Employers.)
The category "Business" has been divided into several sub-
categories, including:
Entertainment/Recreation: Includes baseball, football teams
and country clubs, casinos, horse breeders, race tracks, music
companies, and theaters. Does not include hobby or recreational
clubs which are not business-related.
Finance/Insurance: Includes health insurance companies,
collection agencies, credit services, mortgage bankers, title
companies, etc.
Lodging/Restaurants: Includes bars, hotels, night clubs,
resorts, etc.
Ma nu facturin g/Industrial: Includes beverage manufacturers,
canneries, cement companies, chemical laboratories, timber
companies, wineries, etc.
Merchandise/Retail: Includes beverage distributors, coin
dealers, florists, home fumishing stores, pharmacies, etc.
Oil and Gas: Includes drilling contractors, exploration
companies, gas and oil companies, etc.
Professional/Trade: Includes individuals or business entities,
or organizations representing accountants, architects, auction-
eers, bail agents, building trades, construction interests, court
reporters, engineers, photographers, travel agents, stock brokers,
plumbers, veterinarians, etc. NOTE: A trade association
representing ranchers would be classified as "Agriculfure," not
as "Professional/Trade."
Real Estate: Includes developers, rental companies, real estate
companies, property management, etc.
Transportation: Includes airlines, moving and storage,
railroads. shipping, trucking. etc.
Other: Describe your business interest if it does not fall into any
of the other business categories (e.g. apartment owners, funeral
homes, mobile home parks, publishers, refi.rse companies,
retirement homes, waste managenlent, etc.). NOTE: This
subsection is different from the "OtheC' category identified in the
Industry Group Classification which is for use by filers whose
activities are not business-related.
FPPC Form 602 (7/98)
For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
602
AGENDA
ITEM #7c
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City CouncilTO:
DATE: April 3,2002
FROM
MTG.
DATE 4-1 5-02
SUBMITTED U,-^---BY
BYExecutive Assistant
G ity Manager's Office (650-558-7204)
SUBJECT: GOMMISSIONERAPPOINTMENT (Planning Gommission)
The citizens listed below have interviewed for two seats on the Planning Commission:
Planning GommiSSiOn (2 positions: expired term to 4-7-06; lnterview team: Baylock / Galligan)
Ken Carroll
Patricia Gray
Russell Jackson
Ann Keighranl
Christopher McCleary
Stan Vistical
Council maywishtomakethenecessaryappointments, or provide other direction to staff.
V [DlMy Documents\Commission\COMnl1f enU]
Attachments (Council only)
# IncumbenUnumber of terms served
FOR CITY USE ONLY
City of Burlingame
Commissioner Application Form
Please prtnt or type.
$ arrtiogo*e registered voter
/Copto to: CC, cu, C-F
MAR 2 7 2007
Name:Cur^"
Address: /6O?lLu^o.*-/o U/4 f
Phone: SefSSO o *)lt 6a7^/52)f*^*4 ! email @ptionat)l
How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)? f 0
Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? Yes I No tr
Education:Degree(s/IvIajor(s):
Occupation /ty:
Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select
E Beautification Commission
tr Civil Service Commission
tr Library Board
E Parks & Recreation Commission
SrUroing Commission
tr Traffic Safety Parking Commission
Mosquito Abatement District
Signature:
Please return your application and supplemental questionnaire to:
City Manager's Office
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
one);
Date
[U:\My Dwumts\Comissions\Comissim Application 200l.wpd]
Revised October 4, 2O0l
, !ln*l,;' , K*Ju/,"n* (C "**J")
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
S upplemen tal Qu estionn aire
Applicant Name:
To assist in the process, please aff;wer the following questions and submit written
responses with your application form. Responses should be printed or lwled. You may use
additional sheets of paper. Thank you.
1. Please comment on how youfeel thatyour education, training, uperience and community
involvement, will be a benetit to Planning Commission and community?
A > o- pl',,*-V^, Hv,+c T<-k *'-l K.**"i.W,rtC*fQ
,
&: 2 ,5'1-n-s
X H ?rq:J.:: +:1,?.
* #rk" ffi' **d:l :,',;*qiir
Ve-7t^> ql^J f t-Ues' )'
2. Please list the communiE activities or organizations you have participated in and indicate
your level of involveruent (member, attended event, ran a booth, worked on the organizing
committee, was qn officer, etc,). Indicate the amount of time each month you spend on
each of these activities.
QrueJ-,^ uf 4?9o R.€.n<e 1-[*l-k 6 /es1e^5
/o\-, / vn^ we<. Q"k, .frr,'., 5q* so^)'6$L".{
' f* ,-,u--k*-'{.o --J" ",6 Seqs"''^
J. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big cornmitment Besides the 25 annual
regular meetings, the comruissioners all participate on subcommittees. The standing
subcommttteelor Netghborhood Consistency meets at least 4 tirnes a year; other single
toptc subcommittees will meet once or twice a monthfor periods of two to six ruonths" For
conventence of all the commissioners son e of these meetings are held during the business
day (generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do youfeel that you have the time to
make sach a commitment? V
l<5
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
c)
ApplicantName:
Page 2
4, What do you think are the three most signiftcant planning issues facing the City and why?
D
4
5. Please describe briefly the neighborhood where you live.
o- Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood.
N"lg lr^- 4 tonq-rg *, t [^,. f [.*,'- Co,rgf -.,. f ,o.,, keJs ,
? (^,^ R .. R*, "" {.,* Lr,-* ^ts oJ 7-y*-f> -'* (
4lo,rs,,J.-o{.'o- /o g'*'^{ <-t fr ze^s o"*! 9'{u-=
hourr-.7 / Ar"rn =s ,.ge-,[g
) w"*V u";:f..,-1."*l/ *;[{" -*A.- t'Jf D'p'^*"^= ''{, o^{
" Cor.r'r r.zrcSgt<
D e""J ,-,rs{ur.<
*t"**-J. -,j ffi',-, /r.,
2) y'^-r," "+y f.g-l-.,,lsr fo-kt, S 4o7, s
o € ,a-)e-s / t,>lg yo.^>
q,nJ 9e-,"to 19 . -
Po,-,. I (es ^^.($ut"]e
b. If you could, what two things about your neighborhood would you change?
, r4-7io 5f^--{5
A 5b- Jr*'^ f '"f(L
6. How do youfeel about the city's recent action to require design reviewfor changes to the
businessfacades in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas?
T d-o ^.1 Lr. e4^ uft,^;,^ o1 /4,, y' o-tJ .q
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
K.Qr^-[[Applicant Name:(./\
Page 3
7. lVhat groups within the community have you been a part of (please check all that app$:
K homeowner--R- rentedproperty (residential)
X o*rf* businesiin Burlingame
A. have chtldren in school
belong toa communttyT--Other
& Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like to sharewith the City Council
Below, please indicate which meeting you will attend
I plan on attending thefollowing corumission meeting(s)*:
*Pleose let staff know you are in afrendance at the meeting and
ogrpltcant's sign-up sheet at the meeting you attend
remember to stgn the
Please retum your application and supplemental questionnaire to:
CityManager's Office
Cityof Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
All applications and supplemental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager,s
Office no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, March 29,2002.
( /1-,'L 7S
6eP *tf"^-!.J s-[.o, Is *,4 o-[r.t =t*ho q./{. d@)Buulr5.r.^<5.*lo,{e,
regarding planningfor the City of Burlingame? ;T Lous_ fir*J 8", l,x;aar.r €lr^
p-h'r- ^"+.J L.,^-J ('1.
interview. The Planning Commission meets the and 4 Monday of each month.
Commissioner Application Form
Name:
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Commissioner Application Form
Hease pint ar type-
Page 1 of5
t
Address:
t J-l ,*
Phonez (ilay)(evening)
5C)4
long have you lived in Bur{ingame (years)?
r t
Are you registercd to vote in
I V
f Email (optional)
t/l o#.,^+
Yes Noo
Bnrlingame registered voter
Copictto: CC,CNI, (tr
Education:Degree(s)flVlaio(s):Lt tt5r{42
Jqn F".^n qrsca 5**{".J s.F A.-t T^#tt=t t
0ccupation / Spccialty:
B A.t';.
",,{r
"Arur!+F*t '/'€-r+"t
Please accept this as my epplication for a position on the (selecl only one):
n Beautification Commission
a Civil Service Commission
n Library Board
o Parks & Recreation Commission
KO,"Commission
u Traffrc Safety Parking Commission
Signature:Date:
n
http /lwww. burl mgame. org/counct l/commsstoner_appltcahon_torm. htrn u3{28/20$'.2
MAR 2 8 2002
Commissioner Application Form Page 2 of5
Pteasc rrcturn your epplication ardsupplementel questionnaine to:
Vi lVeber, Executive Assistent
City Manager's OIIice
501 Primrose Roed
cA 94010
Reviged 3/62002
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
Po*rr.4 GroTApplicants Name:T
To assist in the selection prooess, please answer the following questions and srbmit written responsos with your
application form. Responses shanld be printed or twted. You may use additional sheets of paper. Thank you.
1. Pleax comnenl oa howyoufelthotyourdttcuio4 tairtng, eqaience andcomrunity iawlvemetqwdll be a
benfr to Planning Comn*xdr,n atd comnunity?
5ee o+{=- -L Q-J P^ P
er5
Z Ple$c lisl lhc comnuaity adivttia or orgaaizdiotts you havc puticipuet in and infrcac your loel of
inwlvement (member, oltenfud aenl, ran a buth, worked on the orgaaizing comilitttee, was ail offtcer, etc).
htdicdethc anpunl of litw each northym spendon eoch of thae rctfudtirs"
3. Thc posfion of Hanrtng Conmissioae is a big commitnent Besidzs the 25 anrual rqulu medings, the
commissioners all poaicipate on subcommiltex The standing subcommifretfor Neighborhd C;onststency
me6 sl lcos, 1 tina a yau; aho single apic sabcornmitle* will ned once u twice a nodhfor paiods of ttw
to six ruonths. For convenicnce of all the commissionets some of thw nudings ate held furtng the busillless itq
(gen*alb a the beginrtng or end of the day). Do youfezl tlut you hwe the tinu to mahe such a commiunent?
http://www. burl mgame. orpcouncr Ucommrcsloner_apphcatron_torm. hm u3/2U/2002
1
2
I have training in the visual arts, and have an interest in city planning.
As a long time resident of the city, I have experienced the changes in
our city for decades. I am aware ofthe changes in our population and
the changing needs ofour citizens.
I am currently an elected member of the San Mateo County Council
of the Green Party. I am member and past President of Peace Action
of San Mateo County. I have worked as an organizer for the
California Oaks Project (a Ralph Nader organization) and for the
single payer health plan initiative. I have served as a volunteer at
Lincoln School in Burlingame, and as a member of the Board of
Directors of the Unitarian Church of San Mateo. I spend five hours a
week on these activities.
I am a retired teacher and have time and energy to devote to my crty.
I think that we have a housing problem in our city. The cost of
housing is so high that people who work here can not afford to live
here. Workers have to commute for long distances. This is a
concern for our qualrty of life and the environment.
Our infrastructure is aging and need of repair and maintenance. We
need to get our over head wires put under ground.
We have transportation and parking issues that need to be addressed.
I live in the Easton section ofthe city. I live two short blocks west of
El Camino Real in an area of single family homes.
a. I like the well-maintained homes in the area and the street trees.
b. I would like it if there were not so many cars going up and down
my street, and if fewer cars were parked at the curbs. I wish that
the empty lot at the corner of Adeline and El Camino Real were
made into a community garden for the people who live in the
3
4
5
7
apartment buildings of our city. We should search out other
spaces that could be made into communrty gardens.
6. I support the plan for design review for business facades in the
Burlingame Ave. and Broadway areas. I think that some review is
necessary so that the older and the new or remodeled facades respect
each other. We have many beautiful buildings of the 1930's that set
the tone of our city. I think that the new should compliment these
older buildings.
I am a homeowner. I work in the city. I have children in the
schools. I am a member of a religious community. I am a
community activist.
I think we should make our communrty more bike friendly. Nearly
all our children are driven to school. It would be better for them to
ride their bikes. In a community that plans for the use of bikes,
people of all ages can use this means of transportation to get around
safely.
The Bart station in Miltbrae is going to have an effect on our city.
We must plan for the changes that are going to take place.
I think that our city should be involved in the AirPort Noise
Abatement Program so that we could take part in having our homes
retrofitted and insulated against the noise.
I think that the city of Burlingame should be more responsible for our
water supply. We have no voice on the Public Utilities Commission
of San Francisco which supplies our water.
I
9. t plan to attend the planning commission meeting on April 8,2002.
FOR CITY USE ONLY
City of Burlingame
Commissioner Application Form
Please print or type.to:
MAR 2 I 2002 D
Name: RUSSell tr. Jqckson
Address:Walnut
Phone:,&1'0-(aoil
I(o5O-)b11
4
Email @pnonat)t,1ay1b nSlr € qol .COvn
How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)? h V e*fS
Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? yes,X No tr
Education: UCDailb CSf\ Degree(s)/Ivlajor(s): BS ?io rcaL Sciez-ces
Occupation / Specialty: 6UerA1 LAV,f(,aclD{
Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one):
EI Beautification Commission
tr Civil Service Commission
tr Library Board
tr Parks & Recreation Commission
Eftu*ring Commission
tl Traffic S afety Parking Commission
Abatement District
Date: 3 )q oa
Please refurn app and supplemental questionnaire to :
City Manager's Office
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
[D;\l\4y Deumnts\Comision\Comission Appliotion 200l.wpd]
Revised Ocober 4, 20Ol
CC, CM,
Applicant N ame:
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemen tal Questionnaire
AusgL,h&son
To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questiorn and submit written responses with
your application form. Responses should be typed.Y ormay use additional sheets ofpaper. Thank you.
1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, uperience and
community involvement, will be a beneftt to Planning Commission and communiqt?
2, Please ltst the communiqt activities or organizations you have participated in and
indicate your level of involvement (member, attended event, ran a booth, worked on the
organizing committee, was an ofricer, etc.). Indicate the amount of time each month you
spend on each of these activities.
i. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Besides the 25 annual
regular meetings, the commissioners all parttcipate on subcommittees. The standing
subcommittee for Neighborhood Consistenqt meets at least 4 times a year; other single
topic subcommittees will meet once or twice a monthfor two to six months. For
convenience of all the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the business
day (generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do yoafeel that you have the time to
make such a commitment?
City of Burlingame
Phnning Commission
Supplemental Question nrirc
Applicant Neme; Russell Jackson
Page I
1.Pleosc comnunt on how youfeel that ltour educdon, trainlng, qerlcnee and
communlty involvement, wlll be a benetlt to Planning Commisslon and community?
I have been a Burlingare resident and boreowrer sirce 1981, ad was raised in
Ivlillbrae, and have thercfore witnessed many chmges in our cornmnrnity over the years. I
have four children u&o have been, ad curre,rilly are, active in local )rcuth sporis and
scbool activities. I am a general contractor speciafiang in residential remodeling, with
rcst of my businss$ hcated here in tk mid-Peninzula and have been witness to the
plamiog proccss both as part ofmy business and as a horneowner.
Plcase lN the corumunity activtti* or organizfrions you ha,e panicipatcd in and
indicate yow level otinwlvenent (nwnber, ottended event ran a booth, worked on the
oryanizing commifree, was ut offtce4 dc.). Irdicste the anaunt af finu eoch month
you ryend on each of thue adtvitiq.
Past activities inctude AYSO (former coach ad referee); BYBA (former coach); the
former Burlingame-Hillsborough Little League (coach and organizer of the last r@or
opening day ceremonies at Washington Park in 1991). I am current$ a rcmber ofthe
Padsh Council ad Men's Club at St. Cath€rine of Siena Church and spend
approximately 15 hours per rnonth on their activities.
3.The psttion af Planntng Conmisstoner k a btg corwrrirrrunt B*tdcs the 25 ununl
rcgulu medings, the conniwions all panicipae on subcommitte* The slonding
subcommitteefor Neighborhood Corcistency nu6 a, least I tims a yeo$ other single
loplc sufuomnittex will weA once ot twice a monthfor two to six manths. For
conveniene af oll the annissionq* sorne of these ,rKAW orc hcld during the
businw doy (generolly at the begirrning or end otthe day). Iro youfeel that you ha,e
the tinu ta nuke such a commifiwfi?
Because I am self eryloyed I have the luxury of sefiing my own scMule. The only
conflict that might arise from tinp to time would be the rnonthly Parish Council rneetings
at St. Catherine's.
1.WhN doputhink arc the three most stgttlfrcunt planning issuesfacing the CW orrd
whyT
a-Shopping and business areas (e.g. Burlingame Avenue and adjacent
downtowrq Broadwan aud California Drive); I believe that the Plarming
Commission needs to carefully consider the size and types ofbusinesses in
these areas with a goal to preservs the special flavor of our town S/hile I
do not think the Plarudqg Commissbn strould limit the specific businesses
that corre into Burlingare, I think we should nrake sure that the size of
the busirrcsses are not out ofproportion, or too large, for our business
districts.
2.
City of Burlingame
Plenning Commission
Supplementrl Questionnairc
Applicant Neme: Russell Jackson
Page 2
,.
b.Rollins Road Idustrial Area and C.omrrercial Areas east of Hwy l0l (Old
Bayshore Hury and Airport Blvd.): The tlpes of businesses in these
commercial areas have changed over the yearsi as has the business clirnate
in th Peninsula area We ned to determine ttre types of businesses that
we want to attract to Burlingame, their potential reventre to Btrlingarne,
the types of services required by these busirrcsses, and their impact on the
zurrouding aruas, strchas tratrc control ad drainage.
c. BART: The l!fillbrae BART Station will be operational soon ard will
gfeatly iryact all of Burlingure, but particularly the northern part of our
town: all ofRollins Road, Broadway, Californb Drive, Trousdale fhive,
and all fi,eeway access tolfrom both 280 and l0l. We d to be sure that
our reighborhoods are rot impact d negatively by BART, and that they
continue to rernain as intact neighborhood conuntrnities.
Pleax deribe bdqly the ruighfurtod where you llve.
I live on ttre north block of Walnut Avenre: one block west of El Camino, between
Forestview ad Mllow Avenues. It is a street tbat has unique homes that were buih
anywhere from the early 1900's to hte 1970's.
& Idcntify two thtngs you llhe ,rroil ofuuyour neighborhood
I like tb individuality ofthe homes in my neighborhood. In addition, u/h€n my wife ard
I first bought otr home tlrene were several elderly neigtrbors who were ttre original
ow-ners oftheir homes, with few children- Our neighborhood has ctranged with frsrilies
ofyoung children having recently moved into ttr neighborhood, bringing their energy
ad enthusiasm. Thanl&lly, the older reside,nts in our neighborbod seem to eqioy tlneir
yormger, rew rrcighbors.
h rf you coul4 whd tt+to things abou yow neighbortod woald you change?
I would change tlp narrovmess ofWakrut Avenrrc, as the fre department hs difficutty
driving down our street if cus are parked on both sides. In addition, as oldff homes are
gised ad replaced with new hmes, I wouH change tk size aod design ofthe newer
homes so that they rnore closety conformed with the rest ofthe neighborhood.
Eow fu yoafel abw the cily's rcccnt adim b reqdre datgn roieufor chatgx lo
the budnasfacada in the BwltttgutuAvenae and Broaduuy arcu?
I am in frvor ofthe city's action to require design revbw, as I think ooe ofthe planning
Cormrission's duties is to help preserve the unique nature of our Burlingame Avenue and
Broadwayarsas.
6
City of Burllngeme
Planning Coumission
Suppbmentrl Questionnaire
Applicent Nrme: Ru$ell Jackson
page 3
7.Wwl gronp wilhh the wmuadty have twu been aNfi of @letx chech all tha
@y):
)m{ hottuownet
)O{$, rcntedproperty (ruidcntial)(in 1980-1981)
)W{ work in Badinganc (various building proje.cts)
W own abusinzssin Bwliagane
)ffi( hove chlldnn in school
)W{ belong toa rcllgiors conmaniy
W(. AYSO, BYBA, Bulingane Gblssoftball
Are there any dher ideas or rybiarc yu tould llhe a shue with the Ctly Council
rcguding planniag lor the City of Bwlinganc?
I believe that we should bave strict regulations and enforcement ofproperty maintenance
ad building upkeep throughout Burlingare, in addition to design review, in order to
insure safety ofour residents and preserrratbn ofthe special anrbiarrce ofour
neighborhoods and business districts.
8.
{: } D f>"rt- l-a>-
FOR CITY USE ONLY
City of Burlingame
Commissioner Application Form
Please print or type.
Name
$ a rrti rgo*e re gis tere-d g t er/ Copiesto: CC,CU, Ot'
Address: |531 frnfrY,Vfl ,r Av<- .
MAR 2 I 2002
Phone:o-(evening Email @ptionat)l nC
How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)?\
Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? yes H No tl
tion:D e gree(s )/I\[aj or( s) :
/ Specialty:
Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one):
tr Beautification Commission
tr Civil Service Commission
tr Library Board
fl Parks & Recreation Commission
d Ptanning Commission
D Traffic Safety Parking Commission
n Ir4osquito Abatement District
Signature, &*,{)Date: 3 c
Please refurn your and supplemental questionnaire to :
City Manager's Office
Cify of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
D
[U:\My Documents\Conmissions\Comission Application 200l.wpd]
Revised October 4, 2001
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
S up lemen tal Qu estionnaire
To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with
your application form. Responses should be uintted orlNpeg!. You may use additional sheets ofpaper.
Thank you.
1. Please comment on how you feel that your edacation, training, experience and' community involvement, will be a benelit to Planning Commission and community?
\\Sas-,c+fq0ho,& sho-ols tt
2. Please list the communtty activities or organizations you have participated tn and
indicate your level of involvement (member, attended event, ran A booth, worked on the
organizing committee, was,an ofJicer, etc.). Indicate the amount of time each month you
spend on each of these activities.
tt Vu ailccJlocL s'h€4j6
3. The position of Planning Commtssioner is a big commitmenl Besides the 25 annual
regular meetings, the commhsioners all panicijate on sabcommittees. The standing
subcommitteefor Neighborhood Consistenqt meets at least 4 times a year; other single
topic subcommittees will meet once or twtce a month for periods of two to stx months.
For conventence of alt the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the
business day (generatly at the beginning or end of the day). Diyoufeel that you have the
time to make such a commitment?
tt Oea, ql*no[€A shee,ls
tt
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
Applicant Name:
4. What do you think are the three most signiJicant planning issues facing the City and
why?
Page2
t\see- qftha,htu& oh€ut-6 Lt
5. Please describe brtefly the neighborhood where you live.
a. Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood
&
*Des trl-pheJ shee[s "
I
b. If you could, what two thinls about yqur neighborhood woald you change?
\o6. llow do you feel about the city's recent action to require design review for changes to the
business facades ii the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas?
{,
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
Applicant Name:
Page 3
*r, yt;#I#e community have you been a part of (please check all that applg:
rented propefi (residential)
ohtn a business in Burlingame
have children in school
:belong reltgtous oLt\
Other
8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you woald like to share with the City Council
regarding planning for the City of Burlingame?
\\ Dee q*+c€heA sluris
g. Each applicant must'attend at least one planning commtssion meeting prior to his/her
interview on Decimber 1,2001. The Planning Coimmission meets the 2d and 4h Monday
of each month. Below, please indicate which meeting you will attentl
I plan on attending the following comm$slon meeting(s)
meeting and rememberto the Cor..r'O n*Please let SfuTT'know you ore in attendance at the
Comm'ission applicant 's sign-up sheet at the meeting you attend
Please return your application and supplemental questionnaire to:
City Manager's Office
Ctty of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road l
Burlingame, CA 94010
All apptications and suppleinental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager's
Office no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, March 2912402.
--v-+C[.:\>
City of Burlingame Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, experience
and community involvement will be a benelit to Planning Commission and
community?
My name is Ann Keighran and I have lived in Burlingame for the past twenty-five
years. I have been fortunate to be provided the opportunity to watch Bvllingame
evolve over these past years.
My education focus has been in Nursing. I graduated from the University of San
Francisco with alvlasrters Degree in Science andNursing. I have played a
leadership role as a Charge Nurse and Clinical Educator in the past. From this, I
have learned to assess, plan, implement, and evaluate. These are factors that are
essential wtren looking at building projects.
It is also important to note that before I was appointed onto the Planning
Commission I took a course titled "Introduction to Building Code". In additioru I
have worked as an administrative assistant and property rxmager for my
husband's construction business. Both my family and my husband's family have
been intimately involved in the construction business in San Francisco. This of
course had rubbed offonto me; hence I applied for the Planning Commission in
1998 and forrunately had the opportunity to serve the City of Burlingame for the
past four years.
I have developed a wealth of information volunteering on this commission. The
experience I have obtained is priceless. I am currently the Vice-Chair of the
Planning Commission I have served on various subcommittees in the past few
years.
1. Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee: This subcommittee
evaluates the ongoing development of an effective architectural review
process for the City ofBurlingame.
2. Second Unit Amnesty Program Subcommittee: This subcommittee
developed guidelines to allow amnesty status to secondary residential
units buih before 1954 to add to the current housing stock.
3. Specilic Area Plan Subcommittee: This committee will review the
request for proposal and work with consultant to develop a SAP
progru* foi the northern end of Burlingame. In the Hgusing Element
ihis northern area was identified as having great potential for new
residential development. When we look at the SAP, we will focus on
details such as policy, land use, and zoning regu}ations. The area it
will entail will be Rollins Road industrial area and the comrrercial
area/residential area around Peninzula Hospital.
My involvernent in the community will be beneficial to the Planning Commission My
work ethic, good judgment and comrnon sense; and my ability to work as a leam member
are characteristics that will prove to be quite important to rnaintain on the Planning
Comnrissio1 My experience on the Planning Commission has been a positive one. I
have been diligent, competent, and fair-minded. I have demonstrated my passion for this
crty and have always worked in the best interest of Burlingame. I am pro development
that is frir and incorporates the concerns ofour town
2, Please list the community activities or organizations you have participated in
and indicate your level of involyement. Indicate the amount of time each
month you spend on each of these activities.
I am an involved parishioner at Our Lady of Angel's church and school. I volunteer in
the l$ grade chsJroom once to twice a monttr- I also work the health room once a monttr-
I have coached girl's basketball at OLA for the past three years. In addition I try to
attend the OLA Mothers CIub rneetings once a month and I help out with various school
and church events throughout the year. For example: School fair, Christmas gifts for
less unforhrnate children, St. Patrick's Day dinner, and the school Silent Auction- In
additiorU I am a member of the Burlingame Mothers Club. Involvernent is sporadic- I
was on the Mothers Club Board two years ago. Final$ I am presently on the Planning
Commission and as you are already aware ofl this takes up a lot of time. This entails
reading endless reports, attending two meetings a month, special meetings sometimes in
between, subcommitte. meslings: and site visits-
3. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Do you feel that
you have the time to make such a commitment?
Absolutely. I am fully aware ofthe commitment required due to the fact I am currently
on the commission f wil continue to devote my time and energy to keep Burlingarne the
desireable place to live and do business.
4. What do you think are the three most signilicant planning issues facing the
City and why?
a. Maintaining residential and commercial design review: I think
desrgn review is the core and foundation of our city. It is
important to continually evaluate this process so that we can
maintain a clty that has a balance of growth and quality of life.
This entails maintaining the historic character of Burlingame
and keeping the crty moving forward commercially and
economicallY.
b. Development ofNorthern Burlingame: It is time to update this
part oftown. There is great potential for new residential
development. The impact of Bart will provide us a unique
opportunity to create more housing and growth in this area.
c. Bayshore development: We need to find a way to tie
Surlingame east of 101 to the west side. I do not think the east
side is fully utilized due to the divided barrier that exists. I
think that future development should consider senior housing
and/or mixed uses that incorporate beautifirl architecture, open
park-like space and public amenities. It would be nice to have
a project that incorporates business and residential needs.
5. Please describe briefty the neighborhood where you live.
t. IdentiS two things you like most about your neighborhood:
I live at 1531 Vancouver Avenuq. We are fortunate to live on a
dead end street that is quiet and does not have traffic. We are
in contact with our neighbors and our children play together.
On the Fourth of Juty \rye have a fantastic block party and at
Christmas time we get together for food and fun. We are close
to Mercy where we can take walks and are close to Ray Park
where the kids can play. School is just a walking distance away
and we are also in close proximity to downtown Burlingame.
My family and I are quite grateful for the neighborhood we live
in-
b. If you could, what two things about your neighborhood
would you change?
I wishpeople would utilize their garages and driveways for
parking their own vehicles. Streets are becoming too cluttered
with cars and I am also concemed that errergency vehicles may
not be able to drive down these streets without a lot of
difficulty. Maybe we should look into having two car parklng
for houses that have three or more bedrooms. This would
include tandemparking. Secondl5 I wish something would be
done to ttre property located on the corner of Adeline and El
Camino. It is such an eyesore looking at that cyclone fence all
the time.
6. How do you feel about the city's recent action to require design review for
changes to the business facades in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas?
I think it is a very good idea that the crty now requires design review for changes to
business facades in the Burlingame and Broadway areas. Both Broadway and
Burlingame Avenue are high profile locations that have a direct impact to its neighboring
community. It is just as important to preserve good architectural characteristics on
business frcades as it is on residential hornes.
7.What groups within the community have you been a part oI?
a- Homeowner
b. Have children in school
c. Belong to religious community(OlA)
d. Burlingame Mothers Club
8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like to share with the City
Council regarding planning for the City of Burlingame?
It would be a good idea to develop a process where the Planning Commission and the
City Council could have public joint meetings to discuss ideas and opinions of
large upcoming developments. This would provide the opportunity of open
communication between the council and commission.
Secondly, I would just like to emphasize that the concept of a "Community Center" really
incorporates the idea of a community not just teens. There are rumy people that keep
calling this project a'oTeen Center". If this project is to be a big success, you need to
incorporate everyone's needs.
9. I have been attending meetings for the past four years.
Commissioner Application Form
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Commissioner Application Form
Please print or type.
Name:
Address:?2a flwinhf Pn:d Rrrrl ira:ma
650- 432-7902 650- 375-L826 ckmccl eary@earthl i nk. net
How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)?
Nearly 6 Vears.
Page I of4
MAR A I ?002
Burlingame registered voter
to:
Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? Yes ffi No o
Education:
University of MI
Degree(s)/IVla jor(s):
B.A. Journalism, '86, C.D. '91
Occupation / Specialty:
Attorney at Visa International
Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one)z
o Beautilication Commission
o Civil Service Commission
o Library Board
o Parks & Recreation Commission
FFlanning Commission
o Traffic Safety Parking Commission
o Mosquito Abatement District
Signature:Date:
Please return your application azd supplemental questionnaire to:
Vi Weber, Executive Assistant
City Manager's OIIice
501 Primrose Road
http ://www.burlingame. org/counciVcommissioner_application_form.htm 3t29/2002
Commissioner Application Form Page 2 of 4
cA 94010
Revised 3/6/2002
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
Applicants Name:Chri stopher McCl eary
To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with your application
form. Responses should be pdtledqMed. You may use additional sheets of paper. Thank you.
1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, *perience and comruunity involvement, will be a
beneftt to Plauning Commission and community?
lly contrjbution to the Planning Commission would be of the "FreshIdeas"and "Fresh Perspectiv-e" type. Ey educational background hasdirected toward learning to (i) identify and analyze 'issues clearlthink broadly about how to deal with them; and (i'ii) communicate't
and poss'i bl e sol utions cl ear'ly. My prof ess'ional background as att
bus'iness professional has fol lowed the same themes, and added lots
be
v;
he
en(ii1
issues
ey andorn
ofexperience in balancina comoetino and often eouall v- metitorious -interests.2. Plesse list the communifit activities"or orgahizationsttou have participated ih and ififlicate your level oJ involvement
(member, altended event, ran a booth, worked on the organix,ing committee, h)as an officer, etc.). Indicate the omount
of time each month you spend on each of these activities.
(1., cont'd.): These skills and experiences, I believe, will allow me tobring to the Commission a reasonable and common-sens'ical v'iewpoint and theability to help the group and the City to rneet'planning tssues effectively.
2. This application represents my first attempt to get'involved in the
Burl ingame commun'i ty in an off icial capacity. My wife and I have grown tofeel strongly about Burlingame sjnce moving here from San Francisco in 1996,
and both hope to start to do what we th'ink we can do best to contri bute toits continued well-being. Thus, this application, and the bad typing (sor,ry)
3. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Besides the 25 annual regular meetings, the
commissioners all participate on subcommittees. The standing subcommilteefor Neighborhood Consistency meets at
least 4 times a year; other single topic subcommittees will meet once or twice a month for periods of two to sk
months. For convenience of all the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the business day
(generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do youfeel that you have the time to make such a commitment?
oint in my career where I am able to adjust my schedule as
al ance competing time-demands as needed. As I sai d above,
my community is a
omrfiiss'ion of my des'i ree no s uch t i me demands
I am now at
needed and tcontfibuting
assure the C
I f there wer
apob
to pr
atti
iority with me. For these reasons, I can
nd wil I ingness to partici pate fu1 1y.hat go al ong wi th Commi ttee part j ci pat'ion
cation; my 'interest is not in ceremonialI would not be submitting this appactivities but r-atlrer in.payticjpa.ting i_n the lr'fe o-f ^Burlingame meaningfu'l 1y4. ll/hat do you think are the three most si$niJicant plaizning issfues facing the City and why?
1. Balanc'i ng the need to maintain and develop a commercial tax base and thedesire to mainta'i n B'game's innate character and liveability.2. Deve'loping and enhancing B'game's ability to act not as a,,bedroom
http://www.burlingame.org/counciVcommissioner_application_form.htm 312912002
Commissioner Application Form Page 3 of 4
...community"but rather as a complete community, €.g., with inherent re-
sources of dntertainment and culture, kids and youth activities, (ey-service
providers and employers, so that residents of Bigame continue to feel that
tfrey are part of a Oistinct community and are inclined to act accordingly.
3. A1 I owi ng B'game res idents to update and expand appropri 9te1 y whi I e pres-
ervino B'oaile's innate character and characterist'ice. i would rather go'into.Y.hti,E*ui[]",Pt"U,9"rE'thl\tfi
fb%Fnbilfi n"f &5#fr "2.I currently l ive in the "Burl ingables" area
movi ng to the "Easton Addi t'ion" area. Both
family residence neighborhoods.
o- Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood
Burlingables is filled with people who are proud of thein homes and town, and
who ar6 ready and willing to "p'itch in" on neighborhood projects or activities
and show contern for their neighbors generally. Burlingabl'es offers a family
the simultendous benefits of living in an independant and private home and of
being part of a connected community. These two faCtorS make it an ideal place
to raise a fam'i 1y. I have the same impression of the area to which we plan
to move. I think these characteristjcs are directly affected by matters
addressed at the City and Plann'ing CommisS jon level.
b. If you could, what two thilngs about your neighbdrhood would you change?
If I could, I would wipe out ambient noise in the neighborhood from nearby
ht$hway 101. I would also add a stop sign to the end of my block to slow
traffic a.-bit (corner of Dwight and C'l arendon). Not much to complajn about,
in my opinion. I would l'ike, though, to encourage development of pockets of
retail and service busjnesses in and near other B'game ne'ighborhoods, though,
so residents in those neighborhoods could enjoy walking to do more shopping
and errands, as we do in Burlingahles. See answer 2. to question 4, above.
6. How do you feet about the city's recent action to reqaire design review for changes to the business facades in the
Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas?
I support theraction and wish it had come earlier. Applied reasonably, there
is no reason that such requirements need cause significant problems for
affected businesses, and the results of coordinated review 6f City archi-
tectural details such as these can have draffiatic effect on the "feel" of the
town to res'idents and visitors. The creamery br'rllboard d'i scovered last year
along Cal ifornia street when the auto parts shop was raised, was a fantasticplus for that area. Deta'i ls like that, whibh can create a sense of "p1ace"
and prevent Burlingame Avenue from proceed.ing further down the path of
becomi ng a s impl e and f acel ess shoppi ng ma1 'l , are ci"i ti cal .
7. ll/hat groups within the community have you been a part of (please check all thot apply):
of
are
town, and dm i n
medium-to-high
the process.l
dens'ity fingle
xxx
xtrx_
homeowner
rented prop erty (r esidential)
work in Burlingame
own a business in Burlingame
have children in school
belong to a religious comruunity
Other
http ://www.burlingame. org/counciVcommissioner_application-form.htm 3129/2002
Commissioner Application Form Page 4 of 4
8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like lo share with the City Council regarding planning for the City of
Burlingame?
Not in this forum, thanks. I would welcome discussion of p'l ann'in
of course, if the Counctl feels that it would be worthwhile to fu
cons'i der my part'i c'i pation on the Committee. Thank you.
gm
rth
atters,
er
9. Each appttcant must sttend al least one planning commission meeting prior to his/her interview. The Planning
Commission meets the 2d and 4 Monday of each month. Below, please indicate which meeting you will attend.
f phn on attending the following commission meeting(s)*:I'10 n da A ri I 8 2002
*Please let staff know you are in attendance at the meeting and remember to sign the Commission applicant's sign-ap
sheet at the meeting you attend"
Please rehrrn your application and supplemental questionnaire to:
City Manager's Office
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
All applications and supplemental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager's Office no later than 5:00
PM on Friday, March 29,20A2.
http ://www.burlingame. orglcounciVcommissioner_application_form.htrn 3129/2002
t urrurussluflEl ftlrpuuauuu rull[r r4BE t ur 4t
-6
CITY OF BT]RLINGA}IE
I a''. -ii. t-.1.!:!,,il4f .-:l:ril
Commissioner Application Form
Plcase print or lype./il'
Name:
Address:
Phonel (day)f Email (optional)l(evening)
?A6?Aotre (&,%;704 Vffi@/y6f@,a/t
How long have you lived in Burlingame (yearc)?ifw
MAR 2 I 2002
? Br.liogu." registered voter
OPto:
P
Are you registered to vote in Burlingame?Yes ? NO?
Education:Ilegree(s/Majo(s):loWwr fl,*zzas ftJ ltru4ttzznr,P*>
Occupation / Specialty:4@//rq
Please accept this as my application for a position on the (selcct only one)t
? Beautification Commission
? Civil Service Commission
? LibraryBoard
? Parks & Recreation Commission
? Planning Commission
,
,
Safety Parking Commission
District
Please return application ocd sup plemental
Vi Weber, Executive Assistant
City Manager's Offrce
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
T
Date:
fi le: //C : WyTo20Documents\slv\Commi ssionerTo20 Apphcattoto/o20Form lrtm 3l28lo2
\-orlrurrssr(,Irer frpprruatroll r (,[n ra$e z or I
Revised 3/6,2002
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
Supplemental Questionnaire
Applicants Name:
To assist in the seleotion prooess, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with your applioation
form. Responses should be printed or typed. You may use additional sheets of paper. ftank you.
1. Pbase comrtsrt on how youleelthd your educdion, taining, qrcrience ond commsnity kvolvenufi, will be a
benefa to Pbnning Commissi.on and cotttnanity ?
fu"tu /1rr744-t@ /*,ry46
2 Hcose list the comrutntly adivtlics or organizdions you have porticipded k and indbdc your level oJinvolvement
(menber, dended evetrt, rot a booth, worhed on the organizing cornndfree, wcs @t offrcer, etc.). Indicdc the amount
of li.ne each nonth yott spend on eoch of these activttics.
3. The position of Planning Conmissioner is a big commihwnL Besifus the 25 annual regulu medings, the
commissioners allpailicipdc on subconnifrees. The stutiling subcomnifteetor Neighborhood Consistcnqr mceb d
lcast 4 times a yeoq other singlc toptc subcommifrees will ned once or twice u monthfor periods of trw to six
nnnlhs. For convenicnce of aA ilte comnissianerc some of these mcetings ue held during the business day
(generally d the beginnkg or end of th" ,t"y). Do you feel thd you ha,e the time to mahe such a cormituunt?
4. Whd do you ddnh arc the three most stgnWm plmming issues facing the Cily and why?
fi I e: //C : MyYoZ0D ocuments\slv\Commi ssionero/o20Application%2OF orm.htm 3/28102
tulryta
\/urrrrlusslorrcr frPllruau(,Ir r ofllr rage J or z{
5. Ptcase describe bricfu the neighborhoodwhere you Eve.
*anw@ leffitdtr9
a ldcnti{y two frings yoa likc most aboul your neighborhood
b. If you could,whdtwothings aboulyour neighborhoodwouUyoa change?
6. How do you feel obout ilte cig/s recent adbn to requ*e dcsign revien' for changes to the basiness facadcs in the
Bwlingame Avenuc and Broadway arcas?
X, homcowner---f-
+ rentcdproperty (residentiag
{, umrk in Burlingune--r-'-
& own abusinessin Barllngame
&- have children in school
S bebng to a religtaus commanily
file://C:\Myolo20Documents\slv\Commissionef/o20Application%20Form.htm 3/28/02
7. What gtoups wtthin the comrunity have you beea a pot of (please chech allthd afiy):
uommlssroner Appllcauon r ofin Page 4 ot 4
& Are there any odter ideas or opinions yoa would lihe to share wilh lhe Cily Council regarding planningfor the Cfu of
Burlinganu?
rya frtrlvl-ru %2M/,w>
9. Each applicant rrutst frznd d lzast one plmniag cotttttission meding prior to hi,s/her intemicw. The Plannkg
Corrrrts$on ncds tile 2d od 4 Monday of each month. Below, plcase iadicde whbh nceting yoa will dcnd
I plmt on dtznding thefollowing commission mceling(s)*:
*Please lct stfi know you are in dendance d fie meeting ond rem,ember to sgn t*e Connt*sion applicafi's sign-up
sheet dthe meeting you &cnd
Please return your applioation and zupplemental questionnaire to:
City Manager's Offioe
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
All applications and supplemental quertionnaires must be rcceived in the City Manager's Office no later than 5:(X)
PM on Friday, March 2912002.
file://C:\MyYo20Documents\slv\Commissioner9/o20Applicationo/o20Form.htm 3124102
Burlingarne Planning Comrnissions Application Response to Ouestions
1. My value to the City as a Planning Commissioner lies not only in the fact that I am
experienced as a commissioner and familiar with our planning issug but also in my
professional experience and my ability to make informed decisions that will benefit the
City and the applicant.
2. Planning Commissioner -4 years with an impeccable service record, including one term
as chairman; Subcommittees of the Burlingarne Planning Commission- Neighborhood
Consistency Subcommittee, RFP Subcommittee forNorth Burlingame SAP, North
Burlingame SAP Subcommittee, various individual projed subcommittees.
Lions T-Ball assistant coach
3. Yes I am able to continue with my duties as a Planning Commissioner
4. Densification of the North part of toum around the BART station- This will be a
difficult notion for the residents to understand because generally people do not want to see
the City bqcome'bigger", The area around the BART station will be under pressure to
change and if done thoughtfully it can present an ideal opportunity for densification.
Traffic- Something has to be done with the Broadway at 101 interchange. This is a main
entrance to our crty and the performance and appearance ofthe area should be improved.
Parking- I think the parking problem around our retail areas is a good problem and can be
made to work better. The problem is as much a matter of perception as it is a reality.
Shoppers must learn to use the vacant parking lots that are within walking distance of
shopping areas.
5a. The neighborhood where I live is predominately single family houses on larger than
typical lots. Much of the housing stock is old and will be replaced or improved. There are
also small pockets of neighborhood retail and service areas that if enhanced can provide a
valuable pedestrian amenity.
5b. I would like to see the number of vehicles on the streets reduced, especially
commercial vehicles. Additionally I would like to reduce tie maximum allowable building
envelope in the Rl zone.
6. Up to this time the process has been an effortless check point in the entitlement
process. In the future I believe it will serye the City well as a check point for projects that
will directly affect the pedestrian environment on our two main pedestriarlretail streets.
8. Over the last 4 years, planning issues and glowth have come to the attention of the
public. I believe this is an expanding trend and is due to the educated and aware
population that now resides in Burlingame. Over the past 4 years there have been several
changes in the planning process, not only in Burlingame but also on the Counfy and State
levels. Unfortunately this seems to manifest itself in ever-increasing regulatiorl but our
City has done an excellent job of streamlining the regulation process and is headed in the
right direction. Lets keep up the good work.
Also I would like to see Burlingame recruit more industry- biotech, communications,
technology, etc.
9. tr have attended the 4l25lo2 Planning Commission meeting.
AGENDA
ITEN,I #8a
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
April5,2002
Fire Department
Purchase of New Fire Engine
MTG.
DATE 4lLsl02
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUBMITED
BY:
A
BY
Recommendation:
It is recommended the City Council approve the purchase of a new fire engine to replace a 1987 engine
that is still on front line status.
Backqround:
Our fleet of fire apparatus (engines and truck) consists of the following:
1 - 2001 Pierce Dash Engine
1 - 1998 Pierce Quantum Engine
2 - 1987 Pierce Lance Engines
1 - 1995 Pierce Aerial Truck
One of the 1987 Pierce Engines is in reserve status and the other is still a first out, front line unit.
We have been experiencing age and wear problems with the 1987 engines and within the last year we
replaced the engine and transmission in one of them. Our vehicle replacement plan is set up to replace
the engines after twelve years of seruice. The 1987 engines are well beyond the replacement timeline.
We do feel that the 1987 engine with the new engine and transmission could serve us well as a reserve
unit for a few more years but due to the number of calls we do not feel it would be reliable as a front line
unit.
It is for these reasons that we are requesting to replace one of the 1987 engines at this time.
We are requesting to purchase a 2002 Pierce Dash on a participating public agency option of a City of San
Diego bid process. The San Diego Bid process evaluated the proposals from three major manufacturers
and Pierce was awarded the contract. The other two bidders requested a large number of manufacturing
exceptions as options and did not offer the early payment discounts that was available through pierce
Manufacturing.
Exhibit:. Proposal from Pierce Manufacturing. Bid evaluation memo from Asst. Chief Musso (due to size the bid documents are available upon
request)
Budqet Impact:
The proposed purchase price is $370,644.75 with a $5,252.00 chassis pre-payment discount for a final
cost of $364,959.46 if we take advantage of the discount. Asst. City Manager Rahn Becker has confirmed
that the necessary funds are available in the Vehicle Replacement Fund.
I'oLrr-rv I ci 20_o2-
City of Burlingame Fire De Partment
PROPOSALi399 Rollins Road FOR FURNISHING
Burlingame, California 940i0 @ FIRE APPARATUS
The undersigned is-prepared to manufacture.foryou,gpon an order being placed by you, for final acceptance byPierce MT-rufacturing, Inc., at its home office in Appllton, frisconsin, ttr" uppLlt"r u"d "quip*"nt herein niroea anafor the following prices:
(i) DASH 2000 pumper wirh TAK-4 Fronr Suspension.s 342, 1q7 .00
Cr s TSM 5OO TSSO Torn e tr'oam Pro OO2 ?-aoenr
Foam stem: 67t' cab with 10" Raise Roof: 5- noci ton
3 radi o Head sets Clark Tntere om Svstem
I vmpnf fnr hncei q ,n^rr: Sep nra t
8.257. Sales Tax San Mateo Coun ty 28 ,247 .7 5
Total $37 0 ,644 .7 5
at our office at Appleton, Wisconsin, and to be delivered to you at Bur ngame Citv Depar
Brrrl nqame - eA -401 0
Said apparatus and equipment are to be bqilt and--shipped in accordance with the specifications hereto attached,delays due to strikes, waioi international conflict, failurJii" out"in chassis,;;t;;;ffo. oth";;;;;;;u"yoia o,ri
control not preventing, within 65eu6 2 I 0-240 )urettlgg days after receipt of this order and the acceptance thereof
t,
Unless accepted within 30 days from date, the right is reserved to withdraw this proposition.
SALES REPRESE
By:
Dave Murphy
INC.
1500 GPM two stage Waterous pump. 600 Ga11on Water Tank,
I
GOIDEN STAT E FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
1237 Doker Drive
Modesto, cA 9535.1-1598
Chassis
lf a chassis p
days prior to
final invoice:
Office: (209) 522-0422
Fax: (209) 522-0464
www.Gol den teFi re.com
BURLINGAME FIRE DEPT.
Payment Options - DASH pUMpER
February 1,2002
Pre-Pav ment
ALL I TEMS AB OVE AR EPERA PPARATUS
ayment in the amount of $175,058.00 were made approximately ninety (90)completion of the apparatus, the following Oi..orniliorlA be applied to the
One (1) DASH pUMpER ----.-_-.--.---.- $342,397.00
g
"Your satisfaction is our commitment.,,
Burlingame Fire
Depailment
Memo
To!
From!
GG:
Date:
Re:
Chief Reilly
Ken Musso, Asst. Chief
4t5t2002
2002 Fire Engine Purchase
The included competing bids, including the successful award to pierce lvlanufacturing, are
substantially more than Burlingame's modified version. This difference is primarily due to the fact
that the san Diegc units are delivered with substantially more equipment, such as binoculars,
sledgehammers, Holmatro Rescue equipment, etc.
It is recommended that the City of Budingame accept the Public Agency Bid From the City of San
Diego of April 25,2001. Note that on page 3, item three (City of San Diego bid no. 4018-01-A) the
City (San Diego) may desire to exercise an option to review the contract for four (4) additional
years and that any proposed option year increase shall not increase by more than 3% of prices in
effect at the end of the current contract year.
Note also on Page 5 item F (City of San Diego bid 4018-01-A) Public Aqencv states that any other
public agency shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this bid
solicitation.
The bid prices for the hiple combinations engines are as follows
. American La France $394,647
. Westates $403,375
. Pierce $411,761
Note that the Pierce price does not include the pre-paid chassis discount of g5,886 or the $2.OOO
discount for multiple units. An additional discount of 916,222 is available for payment of units
within 10 days of contracl acceptance. westates offers a discount for multiple orders. American
LaFrance did not offer discount options.
Due to the large number of manufactunng exceptions opted by westates and American
LaFrance, the city of san Diego chose to award this public agency bid to pierce lrilanufacturing.
a Page 1
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COT]NCIL
DArE: 8 Apr 02
FRoM: Gary Missel, Chief of Police
AGENDA 8bITEM#
MTG.
DATE 4lLsl02
SUBMITTED drP
SLJBJECT: Request for full-time parking enforcement officer (PEO) position
RECOMMENDATION: The Chief of Police recommends that one of the currently authorized part-time
PEO positions be converted to a full-time position.
BACKGROUIID: The police department is cumently authorized four (4) full-time and two (2) part-
time parking enforcement officers (PEOs).In the 2002-03 Parking Budget requestr l have asked to
convert one of the part-time PEO positions to a full-time PEO. This request is based on the increased
wor*load we have experienced since the parking meter rates were increased earlier this year. The
increased rates nearly doubled our collection efforts. To maintain adequate collections, Liz Roscoe has
been forced to spend a great deal of her work time with collections rather than meter maintenance, her
primary assignment. As a result, at present, our parking meter maintenance is not up to standard. I
believe that converting one of the part-time PEO positions to full-time status will allow adequate meter
collections and the proper level of meter maintenance. The additional cost of this conversion from part-
time to full-time PEO is appnoximately $45,160.
BY
BY
ATTACHMENTS:
AGENDA
rtEMNO.: 8c
STAFF REPORT MTG- DATE:4^st02
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DATE:Aolil9-2002
F'ROM:Public Works
By
SUBJECT: Resolution Regulating Parking at City Licensed Property at the Corner of Marsten Road
and Rollins Road and Authorizing the Towing of Non-Authorized Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution to have vehicles that don't belong to the City
or City employees towed from the lot at the southeast corner of Marsten Road and Rollins Road *h"r, partea
in violation of the vehicle code.
BACKGROUND:
The City has recently leased space at the southeast corner of Marsten Road and Rollins Road for parking of
City vehicles and City employee vehicles due to inadequate space at the temporary Public Works Corpoiation
Yard and along adjacent streets. It is important to restrict other vehicles from the lot in order to sustain
adequate access at all times which is vital to the functioning of the Public Works Department. The lot will be
properly posted, and the resolution will enable enforcement.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A; Map of Lease Property
BUDGET IMPACT:
None
c City Clerk, Public Works Superintendent
By
s:v PUaLlc woRKs otREctoRvlsr FF REpoRrs\Tow vEHtcLEs FRoM MARsTEN-RoLLtNs Lor.Doc
RESOLUTION NO. 4o-2oo2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME
REGULATING PARKING AT CITY LICENSED PROPERTY AT THE COR}IER OF
MARSTEN ROAD AND ROLLINS ROAD AI\ID AUTHORIZING THE TOWING OF
NON.AUTHORIZED VEHICLES FROM THE LICENSED PROPERTY
RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME, California, that:
WHEREAS, the City has been granted a license to use the real propefi located on the southeast
corner ofRollins Road and Marsten Road inthe CityofBurlingame to provide parking for City-owned
vehicles and equipment and vehicles operated by City employees; and
WHEREAS, pursuantto Vehicle Code section2265l(n),thispropertyis onlyforuse bythese
types ofvehicles and not for use by others; and
WHEREAS, ttre ability ofthe City to sustain this access at all times is vital to the functioning ofthe
Public Works Departrnent so that removal ofunauthorized vehicles is necessaryto ensure this access and
security,
NOW' THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows:
l. No person shall park any vehicle on the City-licensed property at the southeast comer of
Rollins Road and Marsten Road unless authorized by the City to do so. The property is reserved for the
use of City employees' vehicles and City vehicles and equipment only.
2. The Burlingame Police Departrnent is authorized to remove any vehicle or equipment in
violation of this restriction in accordance with Vehicle Code section 22651(n).
3 . The restrictions set forttr in this resolution shall be operative upon the installation ofsigns
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, CityClerkofthe CityofBurlingame, do herebycertiffthatthe foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
Eauy o1 APRIL 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS: BAyLocK, coFFEr, SALLIGATT, JANNHT, orHAEoNy
NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: Not{E
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: N9}IE
41912002
Ornou
CITY CLERK
giving notice of these limitations
000 ro 7 sNi -7 7ou-Nf-rsavn fioa! s31clH3A MoLlaodfd JJVIs\arv 70\sf7tJ tlNulJ-Nt Auvaodr{3.alsgNr-tJ3s -lvJo-riNosufoNy'71s9N/t1fs oNV slN?wn300\:c
lr
lS-5 '.lI l.:
. . -a .l* rtf -
,t
3a t.
I
-
4rJ\
. : ''
MA RsT E 'v RoAt
rtEilt$trt ' i5prTat ;
.t
:.1
I
ofr
r., -:::;: tii:;,'..: ?'.t.7.;:..1' .,: ' .' -
S.E.E. T3
FARC,
P.6. t
'$
rts,\t-
0J
alrFr
rE
IAs
iL
l-r
,{
rL.4(
.1.
, i-l
, tr,
r lj'
.'-i
)a6
t:1
. il.
':l i
"trJ;
' :.!ri
,r.t
]:I
.1,1,
.':
1,ii
'ri'.i
:1..-.
r t ir-.
,.,1n
'l.r\i
,i
,5o+
*
St
*
rlu\
orfr
\n
:--rI
--
{J
ul
F
fP
C{a
tJfr
aF
rlo
)
-r-
t.
{r
A
a?I
I
q.
s
(D
ti{
.l:
((C
$2,545,202.20
Ck. No. 81663 - 82190
Excludes Library Cks. 81663 - 8.1702
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for March 2002
$2,162,128.34
Ck. No. 146635 - 147834
*EFTS for March 2002
$490,399.86
-ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
oq(D
=q
cl,
(D3
0o
tr
=.D(D
=0qoo,
.D
n
I
G,
SlFINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
(
04-05-2002
CITY OF BURLINGAIIIE!/ARRANT REGISIER
FUIID RECAP - O1-02
PAGE 9
AI4OUNT
95,z5,A9
'1 1 1 ,500.01
610.00
20 ,110.65
132,501 .33
2,712.61
526.99
32,732.20
26,007.75
7,760.94
1 ,985.08
1 ,161 ,22
10,500.52
NAME FUND
101
320
326
327
526
527
528
529
6'18
619
620
621
731
GENERAL FUXD
CAPITAL II,iPROVEMENTS FUND
IJATER CAP ITAL PROJECT FU'ID
SE!'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
TJATER FUND
SEt,JER FUND
SOLID HASIE FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURA}ICE FUND
FACILIIIES SERVICES FUND
EOUI PI4ENT SERVICES FUND
IIIFORMATION SERVICES FUND
IRUST AIID AGENCY FUI'ID
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABTE UAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
9443,70r.19
THIS IS TO
INCLUSIVE,
THE AI,IOUNT
OTT I CIALS,
ACCOROANCE
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTEO ON PA6ES iIUI.4BERED TRO}I 1 THROUGH 9
AIIO/OR CLAII.IS NUiIBERED
'RO.I
82085 THROUGH 82190 I}ICLUSIVE,TOTALTNG IN
OT 5443,705.19, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETATL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AIID III }.tY OPINION REPNESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
IJITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS TNDICATED IHEREO}I.
RESPECTFULLY SUBI4ITTED,
DATEF INANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATECdJNCI L
((
(
NUI.IBER }IAI,iE
8?182
82185
82186
82187
82188
82189
TOTAL
(
CITY OT BTJRLINGAMEI/ARRAI,IT REGISTER
04/05/02
VENDOR DETAILr*. oenotes tland Uritten Checks
60
00
'101 31510
731 22518
PAGE 8
AI.IOtJNT
126,60
150.00
830.00
4,000.00
1 ,4 t5.00
71 .52
1,080.00
650.00
1?9.11
s443,705,19
ACCOUNT
23585
82183 E}IERALD PLUI,IBING & FIRE PROTECTI 23586
DEPOSI T REFUXDS
82181
GOLDEN ROOFING CO.
I,4I SCELLANEOUS
I,4 I SCE L LANE CI{,'S
iICCALLION CONSIRUCTION
DEPOSIT REFUIIDS
JIM HERSHEY INC.
DEPOSIT REIUNOS
CHRIS GLUD
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PC iIALL
I.I I SC. SUPPL IES
BRIAN FORTIN
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
122
1
150.00 r51 22520
GFOA
TRAI N I NG EXPENSE
82190 I.IOHAL'K T I II I SH I NG PROUCTSllsc. suPPLlEs
23587
23588
23589
23590
23591
23192
23593
830.00 731 22520
/.,000.00 731 22520
r,415.00 320 80270 210
71.52 101 68010 120 '1100
1,080.00 526 69020 120
650.00 101 64250 260
129.14 619 61160 120 5120
(
((
CITY OF BURLINGA}IE9ARRAt,IT REGISTER
04/05/02
VENDOR DETAI L
'*r Denotes Hand l'rritten Checks
NUMBER NA}18
82170
82171
8?172
82173
82174 EPS, rNC.
I.IISCELLA ECUS
NOBLE TRACTOR INC.
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAIi/I.
OTD REPUBLIC TITLE
PROFESSIO}.IAL & SPECIAL IZED S
ACCOUNT
2,640.00 320 75110 210
269.84 620 15000
340.00 101 68010 220 1161
9,431.93 320 75110 210
937.50 618 64520 038
118.13 320 80140 220
32t.00 526 36730
71.n 101 68020 190 2200
800.00 320 80200 210
241.83 526 69020 260
65.00 61A 64520 604
750.00 B1 22520
300,00 731 22520
PAGE 7
82168 UIII VERSAL SPECIALT I ES, INC.
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
82159
42166 IIOVA PARTNERS, IIIC.
PROIESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
82167 EAST BAY TRUCK CE IITER
SUPPL IES
KELLY VENEZIA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
HARRIS DES!GN
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
T}IE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
I.I I SCELLANEOTIS
LONE STAR LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
HOI.4E DEPOT
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
23236
23295
23311
23320
23329
23367
?3375
23381
23547
?3578
23579
23581
23582
23543
A}IOUNT
2 t 640.00
269.84
191,65
9,834,93
937,50
1 18. 13
720 "39
325-00
71 .n
800- 00
244.83
65.00
750.00
300.00
356.67
363.72
619 61460 120 5180
619 64460 130
82178 DAVID FEREIIC
I.I I SCELLANE(l'lS
82175
82176
82179
82180
TOM POSEY
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
GREER GARDENS
DEPOSI T RETUNDS
82181 ICISF
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
23581 342.00 101 65200 260
342.00
(
340.00
191.65 619 64160 120 5150
82177 CHAI{PIO}I AMERI CA
TRAI}IIIIG EXPENSE
23580
(
NUI.IBER NAI.IE
821r1
82',152
82153
82155
82158
42159
82160
82161
82163
42164
8,265.71
't ,831 .20
22,000.00
529 36715
529 68030 213
529 68030 220
PAGE 6
AITIOUNT
32,096.91
3,669.67
142.70
526.99
5,000.00
89,077.13
50.00
63.22
557 .02
513.00
8, 798.00
1,056.00
75.00
1 ,250.00
((
CITY OF BURLINGAIIE!/ARRANT REGISTER
01t05/0?
VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes lland L/ritten Checks
ACCOUNT
21918
21980
22324
22624
22660
22769
22894
22499
22917
?3076
23097
23178
82157 ctiRls I LAilo
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
Z.A. P. MANUFACTURIXG
TRAFFIC CONTROL }IATERIALS
82154 THERr.to GAS TECtt
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
REED EOUIPI.IEI{T CO
CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT
PIT},IEY BO!]ES RESERVE ACCOJNT
MISCELLANEOUS
PENI},ISULA TORD OF SAII BRUNO
SUPPLIES
PENINSULA UNI FORM & EOUIPI.iENT
UNI FORI.IS A}ID EOUIPI.IENT
ALYSON ZUPPERO
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
}.iI CHAEL STERT
CONIRACTUAL SENVICES
MAZE & ASSOCIATES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,669.67 '101 68020 800 2200
14?.70 101 66210 222
526.99 528 66500 210
5,000.00 101 15500
89,0n.13 320 80270 220
50.00 101 58010 220 1581
63.22 620 15000
557,02 101 65100 140
513.00 101 68010 220 1461
8,798.00 101 65100 220
1,056.00 101 64420 011
75.00 101 68010 220 1581
1,250,00 101 64560 220
SAI,I I4ATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPAR 22943
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8216? TIERIT RESOURCE GRqJP
TETPORARY EI.IPLOYUENT SVC.
82165 NADI NE ROI{SON
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23195
157.50 101 68010 220 1461
157.50
VB GOLF LLC
I.I I SCELLANECT'IS
RECREATIOI/ PROGRAI'I EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
2?219
8?156 B 1 ENTERPRISE CORP.
COIITRACTUAT SERVICES
(
IIUI{BER }IAI,IE
82139
82140
82142
82113
82111
82115
42146
82147
82148
C. H. BULL CO.{PANY
EOUI P}IEI,IT I.iAI NT.
ACCOTJNT
924.13 101 65200 160
?31.6 101 680?0 200 2200
(
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!iARRANT REGI STER
04/05/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
PAGE 5
82'138 AT&T L'IRELESS
cor,fi4uil I cAT I 0N s
20301
20459
20501
20639
20716
20801
20876
21110
21216
21521
21421
AMOUNT
231.66
600.00
359.76
6?3,25
500,00
565.56
776.18
892.57
oo./t
672.00
25 .77
300.00
LYNX TECI{}IOLOGIES
TRAI}iING EXPEIISE
TRAI}IINC EXPE}ISE
TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE
00
00
00
101 66210 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
200
200
?00
21741
82119 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE !/EST, I 21819
OFFICE EXPENSE
82150
LARRY AIIDERSON
iIISCELLANEOUS
CATHERI }IE J.I.I. NI LMEYER
MISCELLANECI',S
H.V. CARTER CO., INC.
8LDG. & GROU}IDS MA I }IT.
OUICK MIX CONCRETE
SIDEI.'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
REDI.IOOO GEIIERAL T IRE
SUPPLIES
ctTIcoRP vEltDoR FINAT/CE, INC.
EoUIPIIENT llAINT.
SKYHAIIKS SPORTS ACADEUY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SEI,JER RAT
DEPOSI T REFUTIDS
359.75 101 66210 120
623.25 101 64350 031
500.00 731 ??525
565.55 101 68020 190 2200
776,18 101 66210 219
492,57 620 15000
66.7'1 101 65200 200
672.00 10't 68010 e20 1347
?5.77 '10't 65200 110
300.00 731 ?2520
(
82141 sAsE cstPANY, rxc.
IlISC. SUPPLIES
924,13
(
iIUI'IBER IIAME
a2124
82125
82126
82130
82'r 3l
82132
82133
82134
82135
82136
CITY OF BURLINGAME
TIARRAIIT REGISTER
04/05 /02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r oenotes Hand l.rritten Checks
PAGE 4
ITROI
CITY HALL }lAINTENAIICE
SAI,I DIEGO POLICE EOUIPI.IENT CO
POLICE- -SUPPLtES
Hq,SE OF SRECKERS
SUPPLIES
SAN MATEO RENTALS
RENTS & LEASES
NATURCLEA},I
}IISC. SUPPL IES
PRETERRED ALLIANCE
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S
18633
82128 LAEOR READY, INC.
TEI.IPORARY EI.IPLOY}iENT SVC.
18559
8?129
82127 PE nSULACoIFLICT
I.IISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
VERIZOIi lIIRELESS I,IESSAGING SERVI 18763
co,0{uNIc,loNs
ACCOTJNT
8,218.75 101 64560 120
786,91 621 64450 200
?,788.52 101 65100 126
561.00 101 64560 290
678.00 526 69020 011
39.37 526 69020 160
90.00 tot 68020 180 2200
1,9U.50 527 66120 120
?37,60 101 64420 210
16247
16913
18026
18830
1902'
19047
19100
19852
AMOUNT
8,218.75
746.91
4',11.15
551.00
39.37
90.00
1,984.50
237,60
652.10
117,a9
11 .20
565.60
GOETZ BROTHERS
t.II SC. SUPPLIES
CON]RACTUAL SERVICES
BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
ISC- St.tPPLTES
CHI LD CARE C@RDIIIATING COUNCIL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
187
264
101 68010 120 1583
520 80190 2203
97
I.4ON I CA OLSEN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
147,89 320 79100 120
555.50 10'l 68010 220 1451
(
42137 EL CAI.II}IO CIIARTER LIXES INC
CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES
20'105 1 ,314.25
(
2,788.52
678.00
82123 DOI,BLETREE HOTEL
ilI SC. SUPPLIES
411,35 620 15000
14767
19045
11.20 101 68010 220 1460
1,311,25 101 58010 220 1322
(
NUi.IBER }IAI.IE
82116
82117
82118
(
CITY OF BURL I NGAME
I.IAR RA I'1 T REGI STER
01/05 /02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes HEnd Lrritten Checks
551.86
717 .22
975.16
1 19. 18
357.79
96.00
45.00
200.00
54.00
3,028.50
126,7A
289.4A
47.r0
PAGE 3
AttouIT
2,928.00
63.81
1t5,29
18.082.61
13.n
146,40
6,911 .47
146.00
209.00
4,032.00
82112 SAX IATEO COUftTy SSERIfF'S OFC. 09433
PRI SONER EXPETSE
82113 STER ICYCLE, INC.
SUPPLIES
09439
82114 SIERRA PACITIC TURF SUPPLY
I.i I SC. SUPPL IES
09159
2,928.00 101 65100 291
63.81 101 65200 112
135.29 529 68030 120 4200
82115 ABAG . LIABI L ITY
PROFESSIOIIAI & SPECIALIZED S
CLAIIlS PAYI.iENTS
61A 64520 210
618 64520 601
303, 10
/'3.30
'101 64400 120
101 64420 150
09518
09720
10620
13720
13815
15250
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
10'l
101
101
t0l
101
731
65100
65100
65400
65400
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
65100
22571
110
120
140
160
200
201
202
?20
240
260
291
292
SEAUOIA U}I I ON HIGH SCHOOL
OFFICE EXPENSE
PIP PRIIITING
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
PUELICATIO}IS & AOVERTISING
13,79 101 68020 110 2100
BURL I XGAI.,IE POLICE DEPT
OFFICE EXPEiISE
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
UNI FORI'IS AND EOUIPI'IE}IT
co,{4ux I cAT l0N s
EOUI PI.IENT I,IAI IIT.
GAS, OIL & GREASE
VEIIICLE I.IAI IIT.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRTPTIONS
TRAINI NG EXPENSE
PRISONER EXPENSE
POLICE I}IVESTIGATIOI/ EXPENSE
I,{ I SCELLA}IEOUS
82119
8?120
82121 HITECH SYSTEI.IS, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
IIORIH VALLEY OIL
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
PARKIII SECURI TY CONSULTANTS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 209.00 101 64420 210
1,032.00 101 65100 220
82122 CON BROSIIAN
I.I I SCELLANEO,JS '1 ,863,00 731 22546
I ,863.00
ACCOUNT
(
5,361.32
12,718.29
116,00 620 66700 120
15712
16126
(
IiUI.IBER NAME
(
CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E!]ARRANI REGISTER
04/05 /0?
VENDOR DETAILr*rDenotes Hand lrri tten Checks
PAGE 2
A}IOUNT
340.00
4,521 .33
89 ,47
369.53
2,191 .30
19,855.05
2, 0'16.00
20 ,140.65
129,181 .80
1,333.00
730.00
7,202,A0
5t2-ta
82095 i'IARY LEE OELEIIAI.ITY
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
82097 DULI},I ADVERTI SI NG INC.
PUEL I CATI ONS & ADVERTISING
82098 E!/!IIG IRRTGATION PRooUCTS
I SCELtAIIEOtJS
82099 ll.!1. cRAtll6ER, IilC.
I.IISC. SUPPLIES
82100
ACCOUNT
310.00 10'1 68010 220 1161
4,521.33 101 61420 150
49.47 10't 68020 192 2200
369.53 101 68020 120 22oO
80
39
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
19,853.05 101 66?40 170
2,016,00 101 68010 220 1340
20,110.65 327 n040 120
129,181.80
'26
69020 171
1,353,00 101 65150 220
730.00 526 690?0 233
42.53 620 66700 130
7,?02.80 320 76350 2?O
512,48 101 65200 110
80.00 101 58010 220 1460
GRANITE ROCK COI4PANY
SIDEI'AIK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFACI IIG EXPEIISE
02036
02157
0?218
02261
03054
03175
03197
03353
05378
09048
0
0
56
74
82101 P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
8?102 SANDRA POBE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
82103 PUI.IP REPAIR SERVICE CO.
MISC. SUPPLIES
82104 SAII FRAIICTSCO BATER DEPT.
IIATER PURCI{ASES
82105 IIIFORMATIO}I SERVICES DEPI.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
82105 SEOUOIA AIIALYTICAL LABS
ltI scELLA|,tE0US
82107 SNAP ON T@LS
SilAtL T@LS
ROEERT GOODI.IAX
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
03587
82108 TII,{BERL I IIE TNEE SERVICE, IIIC.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
03760
82109 ALLSTAR FIRE EOUIPI.IEiIT, INC.
UNI FORI.IS AND EOUIPi{ENT
03938
821 10
(
82111 TEST IIIG Ei,IGINEERS, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
09270
640.00 326 a0320 220
640.00
03535
02033
12.53
80.00
(
NUI{BER NAME
82094
CITY OF BURLINGAI{E},ARRAt.IT REGISTER
04t05/02
(
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes llard Uritten Checks
0391082086 * BURLI}IGAI{E REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OFFICE EXPENSE
t.I I SC. SUPPLIES
UNIfORiIS AND EOUIP}IEI/T
co,ft,tult I cAT I or,r s
BIDG. & GROUNDS I4AINI.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
I,IISCELLANEOJS
iIISCELLAIIEOUS
82087 * PIPER PAINTING
CLAIiIS PAYI.IENTS
82088
64520 604
22545
01
01
01
02
101
101
10'l
101
101
101
'101
101
618
731
101
101
10'l
101
101
526
527
620
110
120
140
160
190
220
240
250
1100
1570
2200
1100
2200
2100
2300
ACCOUNT
68010
68010
68020
68010
68020
68010
68020
68020
PAGE'I
AMOUNT
5,472.03
6,800,00
88.01
7 ,739 ,80
511.23
2,301 .67
157.62
1 ,120.39
23569
01027
01030
01100
01637
01663
9.21
29.
I .93
I .95
22.33
16.88
'1 .95
6,800.00 618 64520 601
ACE HAROI.IARE
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
sr{AtL T00Ls
UiIIFOR S ANO EAUIPHENT
VEHI CLE MAINT.
IIISCELLANECI,S
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
S}IALL T@LS
SUPPLIES
6520
6621
6510
6520
11
30
40
02
65100 703
59020 120
c6520 130
15000
ACT ION CLEANI NG SERVICE
EOUI PI{EIIT I.IAI NT.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
8LDG. & GROUNDS I,4AINT.
349.03
6,716.46
674.31
10t 65400 200
619 61160 220 5130
6?1 61450 190
3.90
82089
82090 BRENTON SAtErY, INC.
TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE
82091
82093
BURL I NGAI,4E CHAI.IBER OF CO}I},lERCE
CHAMBER OF COMI,4ERCE PMT.
82092 BURLI i/GAI,iE RECREATION DEPT.
RECREATION EXPENSES
511.23 527 66120 260
2,301.67 101 64530 151
8/+1.00 10'l 't0700
157.62 620 15000
1,120.39 101 6/+400 800
01857
CoRPoRATE EllvtRoNuENTSr tNC.,
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENI
01992
GCS gESTERN PO/ER &
SUPPLIES
82095 L. N. CURTTS & So|ts
UNI FORiIS AND EOUIPTIENT
02027
103.73 101 65200 140
(
841.00
105.80
898,05
256- 55
288.94
412.70
1 ,487.00
79.95
64,38
122.64
I ,756.02
103.73
03-?9-2002
l,lAltE
GENERAT TUIID
CAPIIAL II,IPROVEI,IENTS FUND
SE!/ER CAPITAL PROJECT TU}ID
!/ATER FUIID
SEL'ER FUND
SOLID !'ASTE FUND
GOLF CEIITER FUND
SELF INSURAIICE FUND
FACILIIIES SERVICES FUIID
EOUIPI'IEI'IT SERVICES TU}iD
INFOR}IATION SERVICES FUI.ID
FIRE I.IECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUIID
BURLIiIGAI,{E TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRA}I
UTILITY REVOLVIIIG FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HOIIORABLE I,IAYOR A D CITY COUNCII.:
(
TflIS rS T0
I }ICLUSI VE,
THE A}IOU}IT
OFFI CIALS,
ACCOROANCE
RESPECTFULLY SUBI'IITTED,
CITY OF BURLINGAMEUARRANI REG I STER
FUi/D RECAP - 0'1.02
FUND
't01
320
327
5?6
527
528
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
(
PAGE 9
AI'IOIJNT
48,563,82
51,615.45
1,620.00
,868.17
119 ,279.59
26.20
55,969.10
872.71
156.71
710.93
a36,U
513,94
971 .73
721 .00
25.11
180
9
10
23
2
$567,78'1.30
<'<9e?3)Vo\ o
V()rD
uL 8)011
C.E- 6/Y't D
5Go, Eq3.Bo
CERTITY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED OII PAGES }IUMBERED FROI4 l THROUGH 9
AI{D/OR CLAIIIS NUI.IBERED FRO4 81970 THROUGH 82085 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING I I,I
OF $567,781.30, I,IAVE BEEII CHECKED IN DETAIL AI,ID APPROVED 8Y THE PROPER
ANO IN I,{Y OPINIOII REPRESE}IT FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAI}IST TIIE CITY IN
I.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUI,ITS AS IIIDICATED THEREO}.I.
TINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYiIENT
DATE
COUNCIL DATE
(
(
NUI.IBER NAME
82071
82076
82078
82081
82082
82084
CITY OF EURLINGAI'IE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER
03/29 /02
VENDOR.*r Denotes Hand tritten Checks
PAGE 8
AIiOUNT
40.00
40.00
40.00
128.00
160.00
3,600.00
6,800.00
500.00
500- 00
20,961.15
300.00
1,000.00
1 ,480.00
195.00
OAN I ELLE DELORIO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
82072 cAr{ERo}l Boos
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82073 ER IN !'INTER
CONTNACTUAL SERVICES
BOB ROEPKE
DEPOSIT RETUIIDS
82083 I' CHAEL UOSS
CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES
JEFF FLOO
DEPOSTT REFUNDS
CllIEF SUPPLY
UII I FORI.IS AIID EOUIP}.IENT
CIRSA
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
DETAI L ACCOUNT
40.00 101 68010 2?0 13?2
40.00 101 58010 220 1322
128.00 10't 58010 220 1461
160.00 101 68010 220 1460
3,600,00 618 64520 601
6,800.00 518 64520 601
500.00 731 22525
500.00 nl 2?525
20,964.1' 320 80190 220
300.00 731 ?2520
1,000,00 731 22520
1,480.00 320 80302 220
39,31 101 65200 1/,0
23563
23564
23565
23566
?3567
23568
23569
23570
23571
23572
23573
23574
23575
?3576
82075 DIANE CAUGHLA}I
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
NOR}IAI{ HARRIS
CLAII.IS PAYI{ENTS
82ON PIPER PRI}ITtNG CO.
CLAIt.IS PAYT.IENTS
SCOTT UITH
I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS
82ON ASHLEY I,ICNEELY
I{ISCELLAIIEOUS
82085
TOTAL
23577
195,00 527 66t20 240
$567 ,781 ,30
8?071 KAREN SCIIEI KOI/ITZ
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40.00 101 68010 220 1322
((
82080 UNION ELECTRI C COI,ISTRUCTION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(
NUT1EER NAI.IE
82055
82063
82069
(
CI TY OT BURLIIIGAI.|E!,4 R N A N T R E G I S T E R
03/29t02
VENDOR O€TAILr*r Denotes HaM lrritten Checks
PAGE 7
AMOUIIT
317.09
4,700.00
'1 ,056.00
190.00
1,763.65
67 ,53
1,000.00
1 ,239 .52
258.00
195.00
2,357.69
45,00
45.00
40.00
40.00
23021
82056 HEI,IDERSOII E}IGINEERING CONSULTAT.II 23058
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
82057 IiIER I I RESruRCE GROUP
TEI.{PORARY EiIPLOYI4ENT SVC.
23076
82058 THE IIOBILE S]ORAGE GRq',P
RENTS & LEASES
23'138
82059
IIIG LEGALS
PUBLICAT IONS & ADVERTISING
OFFICE DEPOT
OFTICE EXPE}ISE
CAPITAL EAUIPI.4ENT
82061 SECURI TY SOLUTIOIIS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVTCES
8205? RON LTTTLE
]RAVEL & I.IEETI}IGS
ACC0UUT
347.09 101 64200 150
4,700.00 320 75110 210
1,056.00 101 64120 011
23153
82060 UN IVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC,
t.{ I SC. SUPPLIES
23311
800
963
101 68010 110 1100
101 680'10 800 1'100
29
36
AII.I I}ITERI/ET I1ARKETING
CO}ITRACTUAI. SERVICES
82064 AERC.Coi.I
MISC. SUPPLIES
82065 GOLDEN STREET PRINTIXG
I.1I SCELLAI'IEOUS
82066 ROBERT }.IORTENSE}I
COHTRACTUAL SERVICES
82067 JESSICA Gq'LET
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
67.53 619 64460 120 5150
1.000.00 320 80430 220
1,239,52 101 68010 250 lloo
258.00 101 68010 220 1450
495.00 619 64460 120 5120
2,357,69 731 22543
45.00 101 58010 220 1322
45.00 101 68010 220 1322
40,00 101 58010 220 1322
10,00 101 68010 220 1322
BIANCA GUI T I ERREZ
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
23112
23161
23501
23523
23545
23558
?3559
?3560
?3561
82070 MIKE TI FO
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
23562 i+0.00 101 68010 220 1322
40,00
(
190.00 526 69020 180
82058 CLAUDIA }IERCADO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(
I,JUI,48ER NAI.IE
82051
CI TY OF BURLINGAIIEI./ARRANI REGISTER
03/29 /0?
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes HsM f.itten Checks
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
10, 128.48
80.00
1,150.00
8,254.11
1,620.00
5,000,00
9 ,393.15
617 .50
170.00
13,320,00
2n .22
4,593.68
320.00
82040 VB GOLF LLC
ISCELLAITEOUS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
RECREATION PROGRAI.I EXPEIISE
8,259 .92
317.76
1,550.80
529 36717
529 68030 120
529 68030 213
82043 AT&T
UTI LtTY EXPENSE
UNDERGRO{JND CONSTRUCT ION I.IANAGER 22305
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
82042 EXPRESS PTUI'IBING
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
82044
82045
820t 6
82049 ROBERTA TAVAff
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82050
22138
JCC , I[C.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
?2117
ACCOUNT
80.00 101 68020 200 2200
1,150.00 731 22520
76.51 896 20281
8,254.11 527 66520 210
1,620,00 327 78531 210
t,000.00 731 ?2520
9,393.15 101 66210 223
617,50 320 80302 220
170.00 101 68010 220 1161
13,320,00 526 69020 210
4,r93.6a 101 64420 260
320.00 101 58010 220 1341
21918
?2070
22092
22501
22634
22657
?2672
22676
22682
?2821
HELM IG COIISTRUCTION
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
82047 AN?,. ENGTNEERING
DITCII & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN
82048 J II,4 DELIA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TURF STAR
EOUIPI4ENT MAIX].
EAUI PiIE}IT MAINT.
27.a9
249.33
101 68020 200 2200
529 68030 200 4200
82052 GLASER AND ASSOCIAIES
TRAIIIII{G EXPE}ISE
82053 ROBERTA RESTAI.II
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(
42054 I/ES TREIICH SHORING
CAPITAL EOUTP}IENT
23007
2,695.43 527 66520 800
2,695 .13
(
82041 SARIoR SAt/ !/ORKS
EOUIPMENT I{AINT.
76,54
(
UI,48ER NAI.IE
82026
42029
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI{ARRANT REGISTER
03/29 /02
ACCOUNT
PAGE 5
AMOUI.]T
198.67
110.51
435.12
2 ,097 ,98
1 ,099.95
356.95
265 .68
5.026.00
123.83
525.00
23.44
820.92
GE CAPI TAL
OFTICE EXPEIISE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
82027 AT&T L/IRELESS
c(},0{ull I cAT I0N S
Cofil'luN t cAT I 0[ S
VENOOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes Hand l,/ritten Checks
20216
20301
73
91
101 68020 110 2100
10t 68010 220 1100
104,14
26.?0
'101 66100 160
736 64571 160
99
398
82030 IATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRA SFER, IN 2,1107
TRAVEL & MEETII]GS
SPRI IIT PCS
COI.I}IUN I CAT IONS
UTI I.I TY EXPENSE
82031 oulcK Htx collcRETE
SIDEI.IALK REPAIR EXPEIISE
82035 PORTOSAN
RENTS & LEASES
181.00
1,913.98
527 66520 160
896 ?02A1
1\5,12 620 15000
1,099.95 619 61160 ?50
356,95 101 66210 219
265.68 101 61350 120
82032 cE8
,.I I SC. SUPPLIES
82033 D G [AXrr{Us
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
8?034 cDt/ GoVERNI|ENT, INC.
EOUIPI'IE}IT I,iAIIIT.
82035
2
2
101 33900
101 64250 210
20464
21110
21210
21268
21482
21500
21656
21675
175.00
175.00
175.00
00
00
276
750
101 66?10 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
82037 I'IISSIOII VALLEY FORD
SUPPLI ES
82038
82039 PROVIDENCE PEST TERI.IITE
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
CoRPoRATE EXPRESS 0F THE HEST, r 21819
OFFICE EXPEIISE
175.07 529 68030 180 4/+oo
?3.11 620 15000
820.92 101 61250 110
(
21947
40.00 619 64460 210 5170
40.00
(
175.07
82028 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC.
SUPPLIES
123.83 320 80420 200
20721
ROCKHURST COLLEGE
TRAINII.IG EXPE},ISE
TRAII,IIi]G EXPEI,ISE
TRAINI NG EXPENSE
(
IIUMEER NAI.IE
(
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGI STER
03/29 t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
67 .98
1,680.00
5,101.14
1 t220.4O
693.62
91.60
129.77
340.00
171 .O5
518.93
2,701.35
203.01
12,aM,65
5,699.00
SIERRA I.IOREIIO MERCAIITILE CO. 18357
SI4ALL T@LS
82012 III LLS-PEII INSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546
}IISCELLANEOUS
82013 DEPAR]I,|ENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRTPTIO}IS
18635
82014 LABOR READY, tNC.
TEMPORARY EI.IPLOYI,IEIIT SVC.
18659
82015 BAY ALARI.I
EOUIPI.IENT I.IA I IIT.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
18854
82016 CALIFORITIA CHAiIBER OF COI,{I,IERCE
PUBIICAIIOI,IS & ADVERTISING
18893
82017 ACCESS UI.II FOR}IS & EiIBROIDERY
UXI FORI.IS AIID EOUIPTIEIIT
18990
ACCOU},JT
67.98 101 68020 !3o 23oo
1,680.00 101 64420 03,1
5,101.1/+ 526 690?0 210
1,220.40 5?6 69020 O,t 1
91,60 101 644?0 150
129,77 527 66520 140
310.00 101 68010 220 1161
155.25
538.37
10't 65400 200
619 64460 210 5180
82018 PEGGY GUARALDI
COI{TRACTUAL SERVTCES
19044
82019 A}IG NEUSPAPERS
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19083
82020 ItI NOLTA BUSII,IESS SYSTEiIS
EOUIPI{E}IT i,IAI NT.
19131
82021 IMAGEi'{AX, INC.
IlI SCETLANEOUS
19145
82022 BLACX I4OUNIAI N SPRING I,IATER
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
19330
518.93 101 65200 2oo
2,701.35 731 22518
203.01 101 66210 120
12,414.65 320 760,10 210
5,599.00 320 78290 210
169.20
I .85
320 79100 120
320 80510 220
42023
82021
82025
SIG}IET TESTIIIG LABS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
UILSEY & HAM
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
19367
19397
251.66
251.67
251.67
(
PENII,ISULA CORRIDOR
RENTS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
REIITS & LEASES
JOINT 20060
101 66210 180
526 69020 180
527 66120 180
3,755.00
82011
(
i.JUI4BER IIAI{E
81996 ELECTRO-i,IOTION IIICORPORAIED
PUI.IP EOUI P}IE}IT REPAI R
PUI.IP EOUIPiIENT REPAIR
81997 ROYAL }IHOLESALE ELECTRIC
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
81998
CITY OF BURLINGAUE!,ARRANl REGISTER
03t29 /02
VENDOR
'*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
DETAI L
11007
14855
((
BOREL/POPLAR DEVELOPTIEIII
I{ISCELLANEq,,S
5?6 69020 230
527 665?0 230
526 69020 '110
527 66520 120
619 64460 110
1 ,190,75
1 ,190.75
ACCOUNT
PA6E 3
Al'louNT
2 ,381 .50
1 ,212.06
360.00
1 ,7?1 .00
71.55
2,698.39
1 ,640.00
111.24
83.02
1 ,164.80
1 ,237.00
717.06
25.11
252.33
15196
81999 SPECIALIZED CO}.,IMUNICATIOIIS
COIIIMUN I CAT I O}I S
157a7
82OOO I.IOSS RUBBER & EOUIP}IENT CORP.
TRAINTNG EXPEXSE
16225
82001
JUDY PISAIIO
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
SUPERI OR ALUMINUU BODY CORP.
I,4 I SCE L LAIIEOUS
82002 LINDA HOECK
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
1,212.06 101 66240 120
350.00 101 68010 220 1450
1,721.00 521 61150 160
2,698,39 618 61520 60l
1,640,00 101 68010 220 1346
111.21 '101 65200 20t
85.02 '101 68020 ,l9o 22oo
1,'f 64,80 526 36730
1,237.00 101 66210 226
I4ETRO r.r0B I LE Co [Ut{ t CAT I OtiS
RADI0 I'lAI tlT,
82004 PRIOE PAIIiT
8tDG, & GROUNDS ilAINT.
8200J
82005
82006
82007
16229
16390
17402
17411
17497
17546
17568
120,16
139.13
157.n
17450
ROI.II C ENVI RONI1EIITAL
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE
17153
COLORPRI NT DIGITAT
OFF I CE EXPEIISE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
OIFICE EXPENSE
82008 H I -TEC}I EI.IERGENCY VEHICLE
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI ilT.
82009 LEE & ASSOCIAIES
EOUI PI4E}IT I,{AIIIT.
25.11 625 55213 203
252,33 101 65200 2oO
82010 ROBY}I iIC}IAUARA
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
17588
508.80 10'l 68010 220 1161
508.80
71.55 527 66520 260
(
}JUMBER iIAI.IE
CITY OT BURLINGAIIEIJARRAIIT REGISTER
03/29/02
VENDOR DEIAIL
'*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
0308081982 PACIFIC BELL
COMMUNTCAT IONS
UTI L ITY EXPENSE
81983 STEPIIEN J. PI CCHI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
81984 SAII IIATEO COUIITY CONVENTIOII &
MISCELLA}IEqJS
81985 LEE EUFFINGTON TAX COLLECTOR
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
ACCOTJNT
PAGE 2
Ai.touflT
1 ,409.64
640.00
135,770.55
1 ,100.r1
71.29
429.00
292,21
5,644.73
857.35
10,738.4'
800.00
40.00
2,026.82
640.00 101 68010 220 ,t572
135,7t0.55 731 225A7
71.29 520 55700 130
I ,378.93
430.71
101 55100,160
496 202A1
101 66210 210
526 69020 210
527 66520 710
81986 SNAP 0|t TOOLS
SMALL T@LS
8't987 PACI C !/EST SECUR I TY, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
PROFESSIOI{AL & SPECtAt I ZED S
81988 [,EST GROJP PAY}IENT CTR.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
03168
05/13'1
03465
03587
03601
03961
't43.00
143.00
143.00
81989 CALLA}IDERASSOCTATES
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
292,21 101 64550 210
5,544.73 320 71171 210
857.35 'tor 66100 210
10,738.45 618 64120 225
800,00 101 68010 220 1462
/,0.00 101 65200 202
81990 ocE. -BRUNING, IXC.
PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S
09193
8'1991 AEAG - LIABTIITY
CLAII.iS ADJUST!NG SERVICES
09518
81992 BERNARD ED!'ARDS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
09548
81993 SHATIER I S AUTO SERVICE CEIITER
VEH ICLE I.IAI NT.
11121
81994
09161
11568
20.56
515.19
50.00
31.93
I ,598.84
CHIET BI LL REILLY
OFFICE EXPEIISE
}IISC. SUPPLIES
UNI TORI.IS AND EOUIPI.IENT
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAINT.
IRAIIIING EXPENSE
101 65200 110
101 65200 120
101 55200 140
101 65200 203
101 61200 260
8199t AT&T
UTILITY EXPE},ISE
13940
217.29 896 20281
217.29
((
1,400.54 320 76010 ?10
(
NUI.IBER I{AI{E
(
CITY OT BURLINGAI,IEI/ARRANl REGISTER
03/29 t02
01400
02184
0224a
0?261
02365
PAGE'I
A OU T
I ,615, 't0
328.45
745.00
438.88
166, '130.00
1 ,313.86
5,673.50
6?.89
9?5 .96
9,156,71
133.73
49 ,328,66
36.00
't5.30
11.59
13.31
I ,631.67
13.30
't3.30
47,657.08
81970 I,JII I TE CAP
SIDE!/ALK REPAIR EXPEI,ISE
SI.IALL TOOLS
807
807
101 66210 219
526 69020 130
170.40
158.05
526 69020 260
529 68030 ?60 1200
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes HaM Uritten Checks
01250
ACCOJNT
745.00 101 10700
438.88 620 15000
165,150.00 527 66530 220
101 68020 120 2300
101 68020 192 2200
5,673.50 896 20282
81972 BURLINGAME RECREAT ION DEPT.
RECREATIOI'I EXPE}ISES
81973 01857
81974 US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES
021 10
81975 02157
81976
81971 BRENTOil SATETY, rNC.
TRAINIiIG EXPENSE
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
GCS !'ESTERX PO/ER &
SUPPL IES
L/ATER/FI}IANCE PETTY CASH
I.I I SCELLAIIEOUS
81977 !i, Lt. GRAINGER, mC,
s[ALt T@LS
VEHI CLE }tAINT.
iI I SC. SUPPLIES
81978 GRAIITTE ROCK CO{PA}IY
SIDETIALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFACIi/G EXPENSE
81979 HARDING ESE, INC.
PROFESSIOiIAI & SPECTALIZED S
EgING IRRIGATIOII PROOUCTSItsc, SUPPLtES
I.IISCELLANEOUS
908.39
405.47
'101 55200 130
101 65200 202
619 64460 120 5130
81980 K & !1 DISCCT',NT LTGHTI}IG & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
02645
81981 03054
162.98
462.98
101 66?10 219
101 66210 226
9,156,71 528 66600 210
P, C. & E-
GAS & EIECTRtC
},IISCELLA}IEOUS
GAS & ELECTRIC
GAS & ELECTRIC
UTITITY EXPENSE
101 66210 170
101 66210 172
526 69020 170
527 66520 170
896 20280
(
01653
133,73 619 61460 120 5120
((
03-22-2002
NAIIE
GEIIERAL TUND
CAPTTAL I}IPROVEMENTS FUND
SEIJER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
!,ATER FUI,ID
SEI.IER TUND
GOLF CENTER FU}ID
SELF INSURANCE FUiID
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPI.IEI{T SERVICES FUIID
INFORMATIOII SERVICES FU}.ID
FIRE I.4ECHAIIIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AIIO AGEIICY TUND
BURLINGAI,IE TRAIN SHUITLE PROGRAI{
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAI,IEI.IARRANT REGISTER
FUNO RECAP . 01-02
,817
,194
FUIID
'101
320
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
PAGE 10
7?,711.45
194,719,01
56
8,055
1t3
41 ,150
1 ,065
788
25,083
16
41 ,269
14,432
7,611
107,91
50
11
36
65
47
01
95
95
80
56
66
07
$521,
l8z or:; vatD o.,K- 8t4;1
3do/1es .
IiO}IORAELE I.{AYOR AI.|D CITY COt',TCIL:
Tl]IS IS TO CERTIfY THAT TIIE CLAII,IS LISTED ON PAGES NUI,IBERED IRO,I 1 THROUGH IOINcLUslvE, AND/OR clAtl'ls llul'IBERED FRo'4 81856 TliRouctt 81969 tHcLUstvE,TorALrNG tNIMrylT oF $521 ,i07 .91 , lrAvE BEEN cHEcKED lir DETATL ArD rppiovii sv THE pRopER
oFFICTALS, AND tN r,{y oprNIoN REPRESENT tArR AND JUST cmncei aCriHir THE ctry INAccoRDANcE glTH THEIR RESpEcTIvE ArloJNTs As norcrreo rxeiior. '''-
RESPECTFULLY SUBiIITTED,
FIIIANCE D IRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEI,IT
DA]E
(
CCI,JNC I L DATE
AHOUNT
(
}IUI{BER I/AI.IE
81962 [Rs
SUPPL IES
81953 LIEBERT GLOBAL SERVICES
CITY HALL I4AINTEI,IANCE
81961
CITY OT BURLINGAMEUARRAt,IT REGISTER
03/22/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r oenotes fiard lrritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
160.85 101 65200 112
500.00 621 644s0 200
00
00
101 36310
731 22520
TONY PONTERIO
III SCELLANEOUS
DEPOSIT REFUNOS 300
PAGE 9
AI'IOUNT
600.00
335.00
2,962.00
210.00
450.00
150.00
4.92
$521,107.91
23553
81966 coRDoil or,,tTJoy Assoc. INc.
I.{ISCELLANEOUS
BAi/K OF NE}' YORK
BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES
81967 t{tcNAEL StIVA
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
81968 KIRSTEN I.ICLEAN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81965
81969 ISABELLA BOYER
}II SCETLANEOUS
TOTAT
2,962.00 527 66530 763
210.00 101 36600
450.00 101 65200 250
160.00 101 68010 220 1344
4.92 526 22502
23550
23551
2355?
23555
23556
23157
(
160.85
((
NUMEER iIAlIE
CI TY OF BURLINGAME!/ARRAIIT REGISTER
03t22t02
VENDORr*' Denotes H€rd l,rritten Checks
DETAI L ACCOUNT
27,500-00 320 76010 120
881.48 10,1 65100 140
'1,658.00 101 68010 2OO 1585
96.00 619 64460 210 5180
14,081.25 618 61520 210
PAGE 8
AI'IOIJNT
27,500.00
881 .18
1 ,658.00
96.00
14,081.25
1 ,060.00
1,250.00
48.98
182.00
156.35
1 ,5n.15
545.60
1,000.00
57 ,847 .50
155,00
81946 MARSTE}I STREET PARTNERS
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
22895
81917 PENTNSULA U ITORi{ & EOUIP ENT
U},I I FORI4S AND EOUIPXEI{T
22899
81918 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING
EOUIPI.IEIIT itAINT.
22931
81919
81950
8195'1
81955
81956
81917
81958
}/ESTER}i EXTERI.,IINATOR COIIPAilY
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALI ZED S
ROPERS I IAJESK I , KOHN & BENTLEY
PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALTzED S
23001
23019
PITi/EY BO!'ES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
OFFI CE EXPENSE
81952 l,tAzE & AssoctATEs
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
512.00
548.00
101 65100 220
621 61450 110
?31?8
23178
23253
23366
23410
?3136
23480
23546
23547
23548
81953 DTRECTV
co,4 uil I CAT I0[ s
81954 SAN FRAi,JCISCO EXAI.|INER
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
1,250.00 101 64560 220
48.98 526 69020 160
182.00 101 64420 1?O
156.35 101 64200 110
1,573.1' 621 61450 ?OO
545.60 101 64420 ?10
'1,000.00 731 22543
57 ,817.50 327 78536 ?20
155,00 618 U.520 234
DATASAFE
OFFI CE EXPENSE
CANOII FIIIANCIAL SERVI CES, INC.
CITY HALL I,IAI IITE}iAIiCE
LEGALINK LOS ANGELES
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S
JANICE !/OLFE
}.II SCELLA}IEOUS
81959 EPS, I |,1C.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
MI LLS PEIIINSULA EHERGENCY MED,IN
iII SCELLANEOUS
81960
81961 J.A.t.I. PLASTICS, INC.
OFFICE EXPEIiSE
23549
19?.99 101 64420 110
192.99
It
(
NUI.|BER }IAi{E
81931
CITY OF EURLII,IGAME!,ARRANT REGTSTER
03t22/02
(
ACC0UIT
PAGE 7
AI,{OUNT
536.24
3.311.16
895.31
962.50
11,840.00
80.00
977.25
151.30
11,132.66
59.01
415 .68
520.00
330.00
150.00
CINGULAR !/IRELESS
cotrllluN I cAT I 0t{ S
co ltultIcAT r0Ns
EILEEN P. GOTDENBERG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE,
GAS. OIL & GREASE
AUTO PRIDE CAR UASH
VE}I ICLE I.IA I N].
FIRE APPARATUS }IAI}II.
81944 CARL DEOUAIIT
DEPOSI T REFUTJDS
VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tl6nd }/ritten Checks
21747
21767
44
80
101 66100't60
526 69020 160
869. 15
108. 10
101 65100 202
101 55200 203
81932 TURBO DATA SYSTEI4S, r|,tc.
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
81933 c0L0R coPY PRINTIIG, INC.
I.II SC. SUPPLTES
460
75
81931
81935
81936
81937
?1846
SA}.I MATEO COUNTY COI,ITROI.LERS OFF 21897
I,IISCELLANEOUS
5,311.16 101 37OlO
896,31 101 55300 120
11,840.00 10t 37olo
80.00 101 65200 201
2?008
22278
22812
81938 TlID.AI'IERICAN SPECTALTIES
I.I I SC, SUPPTIES
22178
81939 PARKING COI{PANY OF AI.IER I CA
COIIIRACTUAL SERVICES
22500
81940 TENNATT
I,II SC. SUPPLIES
22621
81941 J It,( KELLY
TRAVEL & IIEETIIIGS
22703
81912 SAII MATEO REGIONAL NET!/ORK, INC. 22759
UTILIIY EXPENSE
81913 VALI COOPER AIID ASSOCIATES, INC. 228,13
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZEO S
151.30 101 65200 120
14,432.66 736 64570 220
59,0'f 101 66210 120
415.68 101 66100 250
520.00 896 20281
150.00 731 22520
81945 JENKI NS,/ATHENS IIIS
CLAIiIS ADJUSTING SERVICES
16,4U.00
(
21831
962.50 101 68010 220 1316
330.00 320 76110 210
16,184.00 618 645?0 ?25
(
819't8 K-lt9 oF cALTFORNTA, rNC.
SIIALL TOOLS
NUHBER NAI.{E
81917 COUNTY OF SA}I MATEO
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
OI{ CAI4ERA PRODUCTIONS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECTAL IZED S
U}IITY BUSI}IESS SERVICE
EOUIPXENT I,iAINI.
81923 CDU GOVERXiIENT, INC.
EOUI P}IEIIT I,iAINT.
81924
CITY OT BURLINGAIIELIARRANT REGISTER
03t22/O?
VENDORr*r Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks
DETAI L
20548
ACCOUNT
464.52 lot 68010 120 1320
65.36 527 66520 130
511.21 101 66210 219
35,690.27 731 22590
995.00 101 64560 210
1,08t.t0 10't 65300 200
&.70 3?0 80120 200
67.50 101 68010 220 1160
308.95 527 66520 260
20924
21140
211n
21364
21482
21497
21500
21613
INC.21631
21680
PAGE 6
A14OUNT
461.52
65.36
sl1.21
35,690.?7
995.00
1,081.50
61.70
67.50
2,565.00
300.00
1 ,257.14
134.17
81919 outc( tirx coNcRETE
SIDEUALK REPAIR EXPENSE
81920
81921
81922
ESA ENVI RO},IiIENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160
DEPOSIT REFUND
OU-ALL SAFETY
IRAINI NG EXPE}ISE
TRAIN I NG EXPEI/SE
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
81927 OXTCA EHLERS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GEORGE t,'H I TE
COI,/TRACTUAt SERVICES
81925 ROCKHURSTCOLI.EGE
TRAINI}IG EXPE}ISE
41925
81928
81929
026
769
769
101 66210 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
00
50
50
ARAI4ARK UII I FORI,4
UN I FORMS AND
U}I I FORI{S A}ID
UNI FORHS AND
UNI FORIIIS AND
UNI FORI.IS AND
sEnvt cEs,
EAUI PMENT
EOU I PI'IE II T
EOUI PI'IENT
EOUIPMENI
EOUIPMEIIT
't01 662't0 140
526 69020 110
527 66520 110
619 64460 110
620 66700 110
HESTER HI GHT'AY PROOUCTS, INC.
SIDEI'ALK REPAIR EXPE}ISE
300.00 101 68010 220 1461
391 .21
550.53
352.88
97.78
64.61
431.17 101 66210 219
81930 LISA COFFARO
COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
?1713
320.00 101 58010 220 1231
320.00
((
21627
308.95
((
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGISTER
03/22/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
PAGE 5
AI,4OUNT
17.05
949.20
285.60
45.00
2,238.41
696.97
350.00
3,815.80
550.00
142.67
3,652.00
526.21
80.00
18rJ3
81903 CALIFORNIA CHAiIBER OF COI.4MERCE
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
18893
BAILEYIS
TNAINING EXPENSE
81904 ANG IIEUSPAPERS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
PUEL I CATIONS & ADVERIISING
ACCOUIT
215.08 101 64420 240
NU}.IBER IIAI'IE
81902
81905
301.20
648.00
101 64400 120
101 64200 150
LIEBERT CASSIDY !/H I II.IORE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECTAL I ZEO S
81906 ri/tAGEl.tAx, lNc.
I,I I SCELLANEOTJS
81907 OUALITY AIR
MI SCELLANEOUS 2,238.41 731 22582
19083
19145
19193
19366
19502
19564
19710
19990
20060
?0?16
20216
81909
81910
819',t1
81908 EURTOII'S FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS I,{AI NI.
680.17
16,80
101 65200 203
625 65213 ?03
T0t1 A!,{ES
TRAINI}IG EXPE}ISE
PO!'ER L/ASHIN6 SERVI CE
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ALL FENCE CO|4PANY, I r,tc.
BLDG. & GRCT,NDS iIAINT.
81912 UTILITY AERIAL INC
EOUIPI.IENT AINI.
81913
350.00 101 65200 260
3,8'15.80 101 66210 210
350.00 101 66210 190
142.67 10't 68020 200 2300
3,652.00 320 78290 220
80.00 621 64450 160
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOITIT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81911 GE CAPITAL
CITY HALL }lAINTENAIICE
81915 AFTINIIEL COI.IUUN I CAl I ONS
coili.{uil I cAT r oN s
81916 STATE OT CAL I FORNIA
LOAN PRINCIPAL PAYMEIIT
IIiTEREST PAYI.tE}IT
?0250
32,591 .47
11 ,167.88
526 69020 761
526 690?0 762
43,759.35
(
17.05 l0l 68020 260 23oO
19095
215.08
285.60 101 64350 210
45.00 731 22518
526.24 621 64150 200
((
CITY OF BURLINGAiIEIJARRANT REGISTER
03/22/02
VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand frritten Checks
PAGE 4
81890 IIITERSTATE BAITERY SYSTEI.{
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
81891 BOETHING TREELA}ID FARI,IS, INC.
}IISCELLANECT',S
81892 DE!'EY PEST CO}.ITROL
IIEED ABATETIENT PROGRAM
81893
RADIO SHACK
EOUI PI.IENT t.IA I NT.
POTICE Ii]VEST IGAT I ON EXPENSE
RECHARGEIEM
OFFICE EXPENSE
ROYAT gfiOLESALE ELECTRIC
I'! I SC. SUPPLIES
PUI.IP EOUI P}IENT REPAIR
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
TRESSERIS TOI.I SERVICE
M!SCELLANEOUS
81896 PEIITNSULA ASA
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
71.6? 101 65200 203
702.43 731 22560
100.00 527 66520 221
54.13 10't 65200 110
NUIIBER NAI,IE
81889
81894
81895
81897
81898
8't 899
8',I900
11749
'13689
14338
11523
'1l.855
15513
15739
16575
1710?
21,63
79.00
8',1 .19
1 ,091 .16
98,51
'101 65400 200
'101 65100 292
'101 66210 120
526 69020 230
619 &460 120 5150
ACCOUNT AMOUNT
100.65
77.62
702.43
100.00
1,270.86
30.00
504.00
399.48
165.00
261 .25
1,742.68
I{I LLBRAE LOCI( SIIOP
I.IISC. SUPPLTES
VEH ICLE XAINT.
I'I I SC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
245.66
31.?1
67.16
52.15
101 68020 120 2200
101 65200 202
619 61460 1?O 5130
620 15000
504.00 101 68010 120 1587
165.00 10',1 66210 210
261.?5 10'1 680'10 220 1100
CO.I}.IUII I TY GATEPATH
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
HD INOUSTRIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
METRO I.IOB I LE COI.IMUN I CAT I ONS
EOUIPiIEIIT MAIX].
RADIO I.{AI }IT.
873.47
469.21
't0't 65',t50 200
101 65200 205
24
56
227
522
81901 STANDARD REGISTER
OFFI CE EXPEiISE
CITY HALL I.IAI XTENA}ICE
17495
101 6/1250 '110
621 &150 200
2,719.80
(
54,13
15701
30.00 618 61520 604
17106
(
CITY OF BURLINGAT1EI'ARRAN' REGISTER
03/22/02
ACCOUNT AMOUNT
3,030.87
9,400.97
1 ,516.62
345 .72
160,00
225 -OO
610,11
181.12.
979.25
I./U}.I8ER TIAME
81879 BURLINGAI4E REC. DEPT./PETTY CASII
OFTICE EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
U}I I FORI{S AIID EQIJIPI.IE}IT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRI PT IONS
TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S
MISCELLAIIEOUS
81880 ABAG . LTABI LITY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIATIZED S
81881
81882
VEI,IDOR DETAILrir oenotes Hand Lrritten Checks
03910
09518
10'1
101
10t
101
101
101
320
731
68010
68020
68020
68010
58010
68020
80140
22534
68020
68020
66210
68020
69020
66520
68030
68030
64460
110
120
110
2?0
240
250
210
1 101
2300
2100
1314
1100
2300
9,400.97 618 64520 210
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDIIARE
OfTICE EXPENSE
IlI SC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GR(IJIDS A I iIT.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI{ALL TOOLS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
stl LL T00LS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
2200
2200
2200
4200
2200
09670
09720
09975
10101
10557
t 5. '13
244.10
19 .47
127 .A1
398.38
101
101
10'1
'101
526
527
529
529
619
24.89
27.04
126.61
213 .19
1',t0
120
130
190
120
130
120
130
120
SEAUOIA UII I ON HIGH SCIIOOL
OFTICE EXPENSE
8,1883 ANA FITZGERALD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81884 DARYL D. JO ES, tNC.
COIITRACTUAT SERVICES
81885 cAL-STEAI{
SMAIL TOOLS
TRATT I C COIITROL T.IATERIALS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
315,72 101 68010 110 t,to0
160.00 101 58010 220 1342
225.00 101 65200 ?20
17.05
41.47
144.01
137 .55
101 66210 130
101 66210 222
526 69020 120
527 66520 120
81886 PIP PRII,iTING
I,I I SCELLAiIEOUS
10620
81887 IOEAL RESTORATTVE DRYI}IG, INC.
CLAII'S PAYI4EIITS
11352
484.42 101 54400 115
9n.25 618 645?0 601
81888 scltltA 8, Ilic.
OFFI CE EXPENSE
1 168/+
88.85 101 64250 110
88.85
((
460.26
935.59
86.58
267.00
260.00
180.45
12.75
828,24
PAGE 5
(C
81866 HASELEACH SURVEYING INSTRUI,{EI,IT 02410
I'IISCELLA}IECi.JS EXPENSE
81867 K & I' DISCOTJNT LTGHTING & SUPP
I.I I SC. SUPPLTES
02645
ACC0U T
59.51 526 69020 290
267.05 619 64460 120 5120
NUI"IBER }IA''IE
81868 LA!/SON PRODUCTS, INC.
I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
81870
81875 SEOUOIA ANALYT ICAL LABS
[IISCELLANEOUS
SKYLIITE SUPPLY C0., lNc.
OTFICE EXPEIISE
MISC. SUPPLIES
OfFICE EXPENSE
'.IISCELLANEOUS
EXPENSE
OTFICE EXPENSE
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IElIARRANT REGISTER
03/22t02
VENDOR DETAI L.*r Denotes Hand llritteh checks
02898
03054
03080
03175
03197
03518
03536
03574
03760
942.8?
34. 10
1 ,177 .E
9.52
'1 '13.50
PA6E 2
59.51
?67 .0'
460.68
777 .71
9 tA14,69
7,091.07
56/..00
3,024.00
244 .37
2,100.00
2,277.99
7 ,9AA.56
81869 I.II LLBRAE LUMEER CO.
}IISC. SUPPTIES
SIOEUALK REPAIR EXPEXSE
iIISC. SUPPLIES
270.79
189,89
526 69020 120
520 15000
101 66210 120
101 66210 219
526 690?0 120
080
721
10
101 ([210 173
526 69020 170
527 665?0 170
11
32
23
I
5
P. 6. & E.
!,t t scELLA EolrS
GAS & ELECTRIC
GAS & EIECTRIC
81871 PACI FtC BELL
UTILIIY EXPENSE
81872 SANDRA POBE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RANDY SCHUARTZ
I.,I I SCEI.LANEOUS
81AB PUI.IP REPATR SERVICE CO.
PUiIP EOUI P}IENT REPAIR
81874
7,091,07 896 20281
564.00 101 68010 220 1340
3,024.00 527 66520 230
2&.37 101 58010 051
2,100.00 526 69020 233
101 54250 110
101 66100 120
526 69020 110
526 69020 290
619 64460 ',t10
81A77
81878
TIUBERL IIiE TREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
U S POSTAL SERVICE
I.I I SCELLAiIEOUS
7,9W.56 tol 68020 220 23oO
03821
3,000.00 101 64250 114
3,000.00
(
02755
AI.IOUNT
234.21
406.02
137 .48
81876
(
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEL'ARRANT REGISTER
03/22/02
ACCOUNT
PAGE 1
AIITOUNT
7,094.30
780.00
71,98
150,359.56
576.00
375.00
416.18
33,034.00
81856 * BURLINGAI.IE POLICE DEPT
OTFICE EXPENSE
iIISC. SUPPLIES
POL I CE- -SUPPLIES
UNI FORI4S AIID EOUIPIIE}IT
CON,IMUN I CATIONS
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAINT.
EOUIPI.IEII] IlAI }IT.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
PRI SOI/ER EXPENSE
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS
CAPITAT EOUIPI,4ENT
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
NUMBER ilAl'lE
81857 * GARY irtSSEL
TRAIN I NG EXPENSE
81858 ALPnTE A!/ARDS, Ilrc.
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
81859 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO.
SUPPLIES
81860 G, BORTOLOTTO & CO., INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81861 CITY OF 8UR L I I,IGAI,IE
11I SC. SUPPLIES
81862 LEAGUE OT CAI- I TORN IA CITIES
TRAVEL & I,4EETII,|GS
81863 GCS IESTERN POTJER &
SUPPLIES
81864
!r. r,l. GRAINGER, IXC.
I,IISC. SUPPLIES
TRAINING EXPENSE
VENDORr*r Denotes llahd lrritten Checks
DETAI L
13720
988.20
129.a4
218.52
550.31
67,17
313.48
1 ,541.02
3.01
1 ,542.55
1s5.00
3n .55
315.21
216n
341 .88
24.00
72.00
151 .56
'101
'10'l
101
101
10'1
10'l
101
l0t
t0l
l0'l
101
101
101
101
101
731
65100
65400
65100
55150
65100
65100
55100
65't00
65100
65100
65100
55100
65100
65100
65100
22574
110
120
126
140
160
190
200
210
240
250
260
291
292
703
800
CITY OF REDUOOO CITY
EOUIPIIEN] },IAI NT.
CONTRAC]UAI SERVICES
cQl u[IcAT IoilS
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE
320 80420 200
320 801',10 220
621 61150 160
621 61450 220
01052
01059
01358
016?4
0174'
01857
01862
780,00 101 65100 260
71.98 526 69020 260
65,82 620 15000
150,359.56 320 80232 220
416.18 620 15000
5,160.00
7 ,640.00
400.00
19,834.00
81865 02218
44.17
45.38
619 61160 120 5180
619 64160 260
89.85
((
65.82
576.00 '101 68010 120 ,1322
375.00 101 51350 250
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL II{PROVEI.{ENTS FUND
SEI.IER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I.IATER TUND
SEgER FUND
SOLID IIASTE FUND
GOLF CENTER FU}ID
SELF IIISURANCE FUND
TACILITIES SERVICES TUND
EOUIPMEIIT SERVICES TUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FU}ID
FIRE I'IECHANIC SERVI CES FUIID
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
03' 15- 2002
NAI.'E
TBtS rS r0
I NCLUS IVE,
THE AI,{OI..INT
OFFICIATS,
ACCORDANCE
RESPECTTULLY SUEI'!ITTED,
CITY OF BURLINGAI'IETIARRAIIT REGISTER
TUND RECAP - 01-02
PAGE 12
AMOUNT
83,374.83
988,58
orq ,q-l?. tra
FUND
10'l
320
327
526
527
528
529
618
619
620
621
6?5
731
721 .94
805.85
202.73
089.99
109,01
183.08
130.82
389 .15
980,57
449,00
219.55
826
7
33
1
23
4
12
3
1
16
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORAELE I,IAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
51 ,028,645 .4O1tn"a.r))'()tl.>:)(4>4,<}))
C{._ ft?Ss-
o*.- 11<1 t
c-k- ? I "53
wtD
VOI D
VOI D
ll
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBEREO FROI{ 1THROUGII'I2
AI.ID/OR CLAIMS NUI.{BERED FROH 81708 TI,IROUGH 81855 TNCLUSIVE,TOTALTIIG IN
OT $1,028,615.40, HAVE BEEI,I CHECKEO II! DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AND IN I.IY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
L'ITH TIIEIR RESPECTIVE AUOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI.IENT
DATE
DATECOUNCI L
((
((
CITY OT BURLIIIGAI4EL'ARRANT REGISTER
03/15/02
VENOOR OETAI Lr*r Denotes Hrnd !/ritten Checks
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
285 -00
269.91
22,500.00
728.40
31.50
8,060.00
240.00
500.00
500.00
930.95
$1,028,645.40
DIANNA HERRI.IAX
I.I I SCELLAIIEOUS
81847 SA}I CARLOS TRANSTER
SIDEgALK REPAIR EXPE}ISE
81849 DAVID T. O'KEETE CO4PANY
BLD6. & GRO,,NDS I.IAINT.
23537
81848 DEAN CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
23538
ACCOUNT
28t.00 101 56620
269.94 101 66210 219
22,500,00 320 79020 210
728.40 101 68010 190 1586
31.50 101 68010 220 1460
8,060.00 731 225?0
240.00 101 35620
500.00 731 2252'
500.00 731 22525
930.95 731 22543
IIUiIBER NAI.IE
81816
81850
81852
81853
8r 854
81855
TOTAL
EI.I I L GERMAI/OV
11I SCELLANEOUS
ATAIIACIO ROORIGUEZ
L SCELLAIE0US
GARY DIEEEL
M I SCELLANEOUS
GOLDEN STREET PRINTIIIG
I,i I SCELLAIIEOUS
23536
23539
23540
23541
?3542
24543
23544
23515
BARBARA GARROD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8185'1 DtcK soLtilcER
OEPOSIT REFU}IDS
(
C(
81830 I.|ERIT RESOURCE GROUP
TEI{PORARY EIIPLOYI{EIIT SVC.
23076
81831
NUMBER NAI4E
EL I ZABETH VILLAGoI,iEZ
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ERLER AIID KALINOIJSKI, INC.
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI TZED S
I.IADEtEI NE FREDA, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PAT SIMOIJS
TRAINING EXPENSE
CI TY OT BURLINGAI{ELIARRA}IT REGISTER
03/15/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand !,titten Checks
ACCOUNT
2,112.00 to,t 64420 011
175.00 101 64420 031
49.00 101 65200 160
35.07 101 68020 190 2300
240.00 101 36620
65.75 101 64250 110
3,496.00 731 22520
165,00 101 5a010 250 11oO
PAGE 10
Al{0uIT
2,11?.00
175.00
/,9.00
35.07
240.00
65.75
3,496.0O
165.00
297 ,75
555.50
414.75
11 ,711.74
1,182,15
'1 ,000.00
350.00
23255
81835 BotsE cAscADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OTFICE EXPEIJSE
81836
TLC ADIIINISTRATORS
iII SCELLA},IEO,JS
81832 AT&T gIRELESS
coitituN I cAI IoNS
81833 KELLY I.IOORE PAI}IT CO
BLOG. & GROJNDS I.iAI NT.
81834 ROSS EDIARDS
I'ITSCELLANEOUS
ELLIOTT INVESTIIEI,IT GROUP
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
81837 RoN LtllLE
TRAVEL & UEETINGS
81838 CRESCO EOUIPiIENT RENTALS
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
81839 SUSAN PRISANT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
105.56
192.19
101 66210 ?26
527 665?0 120
23156
23169
23244
23348
23461
23470
23193
23500
23531
23532
23531
81840
81841
81A42
81843 SAII FRAI/CISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES C 23533
COiITRACTUAT SERVICES
81814
556.50 101 6A010 220 1347
414.75 101 6a010 220 1347
11,711.71 526 69020 210
1,182.15 61A 64520 210
1,000.00 320 80510 220
350.00 't01 65200 250
81845 AIIERICAN I,4EDICAL RESPONSE L'EST
MISCELLAIIEOUS
235r5
1,128.52 618 61520 231
1 ,128.5?
(
(
NUI.IBER IIAI.IE
818I9 AMERICAN ASPHALT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81824
81826
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEIJARRAIIT REGISTER
03/ 15 /02
(
81814 U|DERGRCIi.JND COI{STRUCTIO [A]iA6ER 22t05
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIATIZED S
818',t 5
VENDORr*. Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
DETAI L ACCOUNT
7,721.91 327 78332 ?10
526.99 528 66600 210
340,00 5?9 68030 220
1,380,00 320 79100 210
180.83 101 68020 160 2300
6,468.00 320 76010 220
11.31 625 65213 203
1,019.00 101 61120 210
231.00 101 58010 220 1580
168.00 101 58010 220 1580
2,282.00 '101 645t0 210
1,187.14 101 65100 292
90.00 101 65200 120
845.50 101 61120 262
PAGE 9
AI.|OUNT
7 ,721 .94
526.99
340.00
1 ,380.00
't80.83
6,468.00
44.31
12.50
1,019.00
231 .00
168.00
2,282.00
1 ,187.44
90.00
845.50
THERHO GAS TECH
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
81815 J.l.t. RtDG!/AY CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81817 DKS ASSoCTATES
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
81818 VERIZONI./IRELESS
co4itult I cAT I 0N s
22324
22115
22468
22593
22598
22769
22793
22818
??863
22866
22877
??603
81821 FIREI,TASTER SOUTH SAN TRANCISCO
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI },IT.
22661
81822 itILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL IZEO S
22751
81820 coAcH coLoR co,
TIRE APPARATUS I,IAINT.
81823 cHRIS liI LANO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
JAI.IES YARBOROUGH
COIITRACTUAT SERVICES
81825 JONES A}iD MAYER
PROFESSIO}.IAL & SPECIALIZED S
CHUCK CASTLE
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE
BlNGtiAltrs
iI I SC. SUPPLIES
81828 vALLO{BRoSA
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
81827
22899
1,172.61 101 65100 140
1 ,172,61
(
12.50 101 65200 203
81829 PEIIINSULA UXIFORI,4 & EOUIPMENT
UiII TOR}IS AND EOUIPI.IE}IT
((
NUIIEER IIAHE
81798
CITY OT BURLINGAiIE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER
03/15 /02
VEIIDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks
PAGE 8
ATIOUNT
202.50
17 .73
275.00
1 ,375.43
254.00
320.00
644 .87
164,89
2,120.50
22,000.00
2,375.10
398,07
314,94
1?7.02
199.00
TURIIOUT SERVICES
UNt FORI.IS ATID EOUIPMENT
81800 FI LTERTRESH COTFEE EXCELLENCE
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
81799
81803
818',]0 ARCH I.IIRELESS
co uli I cAT I Ot/ S
81811 ROBERIS AND BRUNE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
81812 CO}IPUTER UAGIC TRAINING
TRAI N I NG EXPENSE
ACC0UIT
202.50 101 68010 220 1312
17.73 101 65200 140
275.00 621 61150 190
1,375.11 101 56210 ??2
261.00 101 68010 220 ,t345
320.00 'to'l 68010 220 1346
644.87 101 65400 120
161.89 101 65200 110
2,120.50 619 64460 220 5190
22,000.00 529 68030 220
2,375.10 101 61120 210
398.07 101 68020 200 2300
334.91 101 66240 160
127.02 527 66520 120
199,00 101 64420 260
TINA !/ITKERSOII
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
21168
?16?3
21680
21685
21918
21981
?2070
22178
?2271
81802 TRACY SIRI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
21713
81804 EI{FORCEI.IEIIT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
tl t sc. SUPPLIES
81805 coRpoRATE EXPRESS OF THE !'EST, r 21819
OFFICE EXPEIISE
81805 A& L JANITORIAL SERVICE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
21936
81807 vB
LISA COFFARO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GOLT LLC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81808 rEoA
PROFESSIOI/AL & SPECIALIZED S
81809 SARToR SAr,l lloRKs
EOUI PI{ENT }tA I NT.
(
81813 itIN r LCo, tNC
11I SC. SUPPLIES
22277 23.11 619 64460 120 5110
23 .11
21194
81801 L'ESTERII HIGHUAY PRODUCTS, INC.
TRAFFIC COIITROL I{ATERIALS
21749
22089
(
NUi.IBER }IAI,IE
81783
81785
81788
81793
81796
CITY OF BURLIN6AI,4E!/ARRANT REGISTER
03/ 15 /02
VENDOR DETAI Lrrr Denotes tland l,/titten Checks
PAGE 7
AiIOTJNT
176.00
877.r0
930.41
1,52?.12
371.75
500.00
176.00
2,181 .00
1 ,099.95
711.28
640.00
600.00
152.00
900.00
81782 ERIC GIESEKER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JOHII CAHALAN, ASLA
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
81781 IIESTERN STAR NURSERIES
}.I I SCELLANEOUS
19990
81786 EL CAI.II NO CHARTER LI}.IES IIIC
r.t I sc. SUPPLIES
20105
UTILITY AERIAL I},|C
EOUI P}tEiIT I.IAINT.
8,I787 DANIEL SIRAI{BI
I,{ISCELLANEOUS
ACCOUNT
877.50 320 80140 210
930.11 731 22560
1,522,1? 101 68020 200 2300
371.75 10't 68010 120 1321
500.00 731 22525
176.00 101 68010 220 1580
2,r81.00 619 64460 220 5180
1,099.95 101 66240 250
711.28 320 80580 210
640.00 101 68010 220 1231
600.00 10't 580'10 220 1231
180.82 620 15000
152.00 101 68010 220 1580
900,00 't01 65200 112
19191
19561
19865
20134
?1132
21136
21216
21429
20564
E1789 IBS BUILDING I,IAINTENANCE CO,
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
81791 NI I EYER, CATHERINE J. ,
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAI I ZED S
21121
81790 }IATIOiIAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, IN 21I07
TRAINI}iG EXPEIISE
JULIO I.IORAN
CONTNACTUAL SERVICES
81792 i.IELAN IE I.iARAN I
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
RE},IEE RAMSEY
CO}ITRACTUAL SENVICES
81791 REDUOOO GENERAL TIRE
SUPPTIES
81795 JO}IATHAN TURNER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PREETI B. TIKEIGR
SUPPLI ES
81797 FRISCO DEL ROSAR IO
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
21442
1,201.50 101 68010 220 1347
1 ,201.50
((
20783
176.00 101 68010 220 1580
180.82
21399
((
CITY OI BURLINGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER
03/15 /0?
VENDOR
'*r oenotes Hand gritten Checks
NUMBER NAIIE
81766 BAY AREA }IOSILE GLASS rNC
EOUIPMENT IlAINT.
DETAIL ACCOTJNT
376.44 529 68030 200 42oo
102.00 619 61160 210 9110
2,953.15 526 69020 120
678.00 526 69020 011
985.98 731 22560
39.37 526 690?0 160
32,406.50 527 66530 270
786,572.22 320 76010 220
110.29 101 65200 220
280.85 101 66100 120
134.10 101 64200 150
361,00 '10't 68010 120 1460
17901
18103
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
376.11
102.00
2,953.45
678- 00
986.98
39.37
32,106.50
786,572.22
110,29
280.85
131 ,40
80.00
361.00
185.90
4,501..88
81767 CRANE PEST CONTROL
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
81764 DEESIGNS
t'I I SC. SUPPLIES
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18388
8',1769 LABOR READY, INC.
TE}IPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC.
14659
81NO VALLEY CREST TREE CO!.IPAIIY
}IISCELLAiIEq,S
18713
81771 VERI ZOl,t UIRELESS XESSAGI G SERVT 18763
co{ltuil I cAT loNs
81ri2 REGIO}IAL I{ONITORT G PROGRAi4
OTIIER AGENCY COiITRI BUTIONS
817rJ DEUTIS J. AI,{OROSO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
18970
81771 19027
81775 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
MtSC. SUPPLTES
19047
81776 ANG NE!/SPAPERS
PUEI.ICATIO}IS & ADVERIISING
'19083
817N LIEEERI CASSIOY HSITI.IORE
TRAI NING EXPEIISE
19095
81N8 A-ABCO RENTS & SEILS
I.I I SC. SUPPL!ES
19114
81779 BURTON ' S FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS iIAINT.
19366
81780 SIGNET TESTIIIG LAES
PROIESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL IZED S
19367 4,504.8 320 76010 210
101 65200 203
625 65213 203
(
41781 EAKER ' S CHEI,I-DRY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
19131 395.00
-31 ,99
218.89
18900
80,00 101 64120 262
195.00 619 64460 210 5180
(
NU}{8ER NAiIE
81755
81761
E1763
CITY OF BURLINGAITEliARRANT REGISTER
03/ 15 /02
VENOORr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks
(
PAGE 5
CHI ET GARY I,I. I.IISSEL
OTFICE EXPEI{SE
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
UN I TORI.IS A D EAUIPMENT
c0t4 t N r cATroNs
BLDG. & GROJNDS I'IAINT.
EOUIPMENT t.iAIlIT.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
DUES & SUBSCRTPTIOIIS
TRAVEL & }IEETIIIGS
TRAINING EXPEi/SE
I{ISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
POLICE INVESTIGATTO},I EXPENSE
r.r I ScELLA EOUS
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
I,ITSCELLANE(nJS
13720
16317
16872
'16911
DElAIL
988.20
648.36
550.31
67.17
313.48
151.56
2,3?1.0?
3.01
1 ,542.55
155.00
3n .55
315,21
31.81
113 .27
1 ,445.23
ACCOUNT
10't 6t100
101 55100
101 65100
t 01 65',t00
101 65100
101 65100
101 65100
101 65100
101 65100
t0t 65100
101 65100
101 65100
101 65100
101 65100
731 22574
AI'IOUN T
7,874.30
27.01
2,532.00
10t ,8'l
1,386.38
67 .09
349,01
610,52
1 ,590.31
110
120
140
160
190
200
210
240
250
260
290
292
703
800
341 .88
21.00
72.00
14371
81757 ALt CITY I4ANAGEMEI,IT
CONTRACTI'AL SERVTCES
15595
81758 I.{ D LINEN SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15A27
81759 supERton ALU[txuu B@y coRp.
I.I I SCELLANEOJS
16229
81760
81756 R ITZ CAMERA
OFTICE EXPEIISE
SYDI,IEY MAIK@
SHALL T00LS
27.01 101 64350 110
2,532.00 101 65100 220
105.81 10't 65200 220
t,385.38 618 64520 601
67.09 620 66700 130
319.01 101 68010 120 1694
610.52 101 68020 140 2300
58.28 526 69020 120
CONNEY SAFETY PR@UCTS
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
81762 ctNTAS CORP. #464
UNI FORI.IS A}IO EAUIPIIENT
17124
81764 COLORPRINT DIGITAL
OFFI CE EXPENSE
COXTRACTUAL SERVICES
OFFICE EXPENSE
'17497
GOLDEN NURSERY
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
101 65300'110
320 80301 220
621 64450 110
8176' CALIFORNIA P}IEUiIATIC TOOL CO
I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES
1n41 94.50 526 690?0 120
(
58.28
91.50
((
l0
0
0
200
200
65
65
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER
03/15 /02
VENDOR OETAI L.*' Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
PAGE 4
NUI.IBER NAITIE
81743
81714 SEOUOIA UI{ION HIGH SCHOOL
OFFICE EXPEIISE
81717 8ARKER BLUE REPROGRAPIIICS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
81748 DARYL D. JoNES, INC.
ccllMu]r I CAT I O]t S
81719
81752
8't755 IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYIIIG, INC.
CLAII.iS PAYI4ENTS
81754
ORCHARD SUPPLY IIARDIJARE
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMATL IOOLS
CA}IINO REAL PET CLINIC
ittsc. suPPLtEs
366.67 101 64250 1'10
09670
09990
10101
'1 1348
11352
11577
n .90
117.75
ACCOUNT AtiouNT
225.65
366.67
2,129.01
900.00
66.03
52.61
231 .34
1,050.32
392.57
544.48
097?0
81745 09790
817t6 GARY tl. OLSoi,l, PH.D.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
09902
INTERSTATE TRAFFIC
TRAFFIC CONTROL I'IATERIALS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TRAI NIN6 EXPETISE
MISC. SUPPLIES
649
297
90
90
46
69
93
93
101 66210 222
320 40170 220
526 69020 260
527 66520 120
10256
81750 I,iEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
11101
81711
AUGUST SUPPLY, INC
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
IJINGTOOT CO{iIERCtAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11516
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
ROMEO PACKING CO
I'IISC. SUPPLIES
900.00 101 61120 210
121.21 t01 55200 160
52,51 101 55200 111
231.34 320 790?0 210
1,050.32 101 65200 203
392 -57 529 68030 120 4200
420.00 618 61520 601
544,48 101 65100 120
(
420.00
66.03 61A 64520 210
(
CITY OF BURLINGAII1EL'ARRA}IT REGISTER
03t 15 t0?
VENDOR DETAIL
'*. Denotes Hand Llritten Checks
PAGE 3
}IUI/IBER NA}.IE
81729
81730
81f31
81732
81733
8',1731
81rj&
81739
81710
03587
81735 ToMARK SPoRTS, INC,
BLDG. & GROI,NDS iIAIIIT.
03761
81736 ALLSTAR TIRE EOUIPMENT, II,IC.
UNI FORI,IS AND EOUIPI{ENT
03938
81737
PATTERSON PARTS, INC
FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT.
SUPPLIES
PERSOI,IAL A!'ARDS, I I,IC.
}iI SC. SUPPLIES
PUTNATI BUICK POI'ITIAC GIIC
SUPPTIES
SAN MAIEO COUNTY ENVIRO}IMENTAL
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
RANDY SCIII'ARTZ
TRAVEL & I,IEETINGS
SNAP ON TOOLS
SMALL TOOLS
L'EST GROUP PAYI'IE},IT CTR.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
JULIE COHN
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
c0t T/0, coNNoR
CITY HALL MAINTE}IA}ICE
LY}.IGSO GARDEN I'IATERIALS
BLDG. & GROUI'IDS MAI }.IT.
MISC, SUPPLIES
03106
03145
03206
03380
03518
03964
09143
09499
301.55 l0l 68010 120 1580
22.88 620 15000
563.00 528 66600 210
979.00 ',101 68020 250
531.33 620 66700 130
468,26 101 68020 190 2200
87.38 ',I01 65200 110
264,13 101 61350 120
560,00 101 @010 ?20 1344
210.00 621 61150 200
36.61
79.04
101 65200 203
620 15000
285 . 16
94.97
42.50
185.80
620 15000
625 65213 203
ACCOUIT AMOUNT
1 15.65
304.56
22.88
979.00
168.26
87.38
261.13
560- 00
2'10.00
380. 13
228.30
81742 09560
286,10
46,71
101 68020 190 2200
101 68020 200 2200
332,81
((
563.00
531.33
09122
09132
81711 NoEL L. MTLLER, tNC,
SUPPLIES
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
101 68020 190 2200
526 69020 120
SAN MATEO LA!]N I{OIER SNOP
BLDG. & GRqJNDS I.IAI NT,
EOUIPI4E}IT I.IAINT.
((
CITY OF BURLINGAIiIEUARRAIIT REG I STER
03/ 15 /02
VENOOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks
141 .21
798.09
2.82
15,48
15.19
-1 ,357.16
34.29
51 .90
167.50
t 80.78
766.36
119.67
66520 130
64460 120 5160
65700 130
101 66210 219
lo1 66210 226
526 69020 120
PAGE 2
AMOUIIT
437,49
2,376.00
549.91
I ,818.56
267 -13
199.02
1 ,066.51
2,299.10
3,993.40
1,260.03
97.43
BURLI NGA}IE STAT IONERS
OFTICE EXPENSE
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
81718 AIIASTASIA COLE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
DTCTAPI{OI,IE CORPORATION
EOUIPI.IENT MA I NT.
01945
81719 CoRPoRATE Eltvr RONMENTS, rNC.,
iII SC. SUPPLIES
81720
ACCOUNT
402,93
34.56
101 68020 1'10
101 58010 120 ',t 100
2,376.00 101 6aO10 220 1344
519,91 10'l 58010 120 1101
1,848.56 101 65150 200
267.13 101 68020 192 2200
NUIIBER }IAI4E
81717
817?1
81722
81723
817?6
81727
EIIII.iG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
MI SCELLANEOUS
U.!]. GRAI NGER, INC.
SMALL TOOLS
8TDG. & GROUI.IDS I,,IAI NT.
VEI{I CLE MA I IIT.
FIRE APPARATUS }.1AI NT.
8LDG. & GROUNDS I.iAI }II.
EOUI PiIE}II I,4A1NT.
SMALL TOOLS
MISC. SUPPLIES
SUALL TOOLS
01676
02057
02157
02248
02457
02645
03041
101
101
101
101
526
526
527
619
620
6520
6902
6902
200
0
0
0
0
2200
130
190
202
203
190
200
20
6520
65
680
02261
81724 HARDING ESE, rNC.
PROFESSTONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
02365
81725
GRANITE ROCT COfiPANY
SIDE!/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURTACING EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
HEILETT PACKARD
CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES
X & t.] DISCOJNT LIGHTI}.|G & SUPP
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
PACIFIC NURSERIES
I.I I SC. SUPPL IES
2,299.40 320 76010 210
5,993.40 101 55100 220
1,250.03 101 66210 120
97.13 tol 68020 120 2200
81728 P. G. & E.
GAS & E LECTR I C
HI SCELLANEOUS
03051
19,894.84
2,191.93
101 65?40 170
101 66210 173
22,086.77
(
01992
C
NUI.IBER NAI{E
81709
81710
81711
41713
81714
81715
81716
16.11
42.44
8.55
'10.00
1 ,990,20
8,09
101
101
101
619
620
620
65200
55200
55200
61160
15000
66700
201
?02
203
120 5160
130
AI.IOUNT
395.89
7,117.64
135,50
105.20
136.00
60.00
562.89
?,075.39
80,00
(
CI TY OF BURLINGAME
|,,ARRANT REGISTER
03/ 15 /02
VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
ACCOUNT
ACE HARDI]ARE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
VEHICLE MAINT.
IRAFFI C COIITROL I,4ATERIALS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
101
101
101
101
526
526
55100
65200
65200
66210
59020
59020
120
130
202
120
130
01027
01030
01052
01059
01078
01305
0r 313
01507
01551
82,33
58.55
2.76
5.04
183.57
63.61
ACTION CLEANII,IG SERVICE
EOUI PMENT I.IAINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
349,03
6,714.31
50.3/'
101 65400 200
619 61160 220
621 61150 190
ALPI NE AHARDS, INC.
OTFICE EXPENSE
i,I SC. SUPPLIES
05
ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO.
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
81712 A}.ITECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
EaU lPI'IENT ilAlNT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
31 .38
103.92
527 66520 110
527 66520 120
316.39
216.50
101 66210 120
5?7 66520 120
105.20 101 68020 190 2200
60.00 101 61250 031
207.00
229.00
RAH}.I EECKER
MI SCELLAIIEOUS
HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL
MISC. SUPPLIES
}1I SC. SUPPLIES
EURLINGAI.IE AUTO SUPPLY
GAS, OIL & GREASE
VEHICLE I.IA I NT.
FIRE APPARATUS I1AINT.
MISC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
S}IALL TOOLS
CITY OF BURLINGAI'IE
I.I I SCELLANEOJS 80.00 't01 32100
(
81708
PAGE 1
101 65400 200
619 61460 220 5110
BURLINGA ME
PUBLIC
LIBflARY
Burlingame hrblic LibrarY
Board of Tnrstees
Minutes
February Lgr 2OO2
Call to Order
President, Mar5r Herman, called the meeting of February 19, 2OO2 to
order at 4:3O pm.
Roll Call
Trustees Present: Cecile Coar, Jane Dunbar, Andrew Gurthet
rrustee Absent: Uffi#:ffi:"ormack
Staff Present: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian
Jacquelin e Zlatunich, Recorder
City Representation: L,arry Anderson, City Attorney
ilI. Warrants and SPeclal Funds
Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants as presented.
M/ S/C (Dunbar/Gurthet)
[V. Mlnutes
A. Legislative Day - Tfustee Dunbar asked for clarification as to the
date of Legislative Day. A1 Escoffier, City Librarian, exlclained that
February 1st was a District Legislative D"y, and May 7th will be a
Legislative Day in Sacramento.
B. The minutes of the January 19,2OO2 meeting were approved.
M/S/C (Coar/Dunbar)
v. Corresoondence and Attachments
A. Duncan Trust Statement
Members of the Board would like to see previous years
comparisons of the Duncan Tfust Funds. Al Escoffier agreed to
prepare a spreadsheet comparison of annual earnings for the next
meeting.
I.
Primrose RoodoBurlingome.CA 940,l0 4083\***. pls. I ib.c o.us fpls/Rls,html
a7
II.
B. CLA/PLCF Informatlon
President Herman suggested ttrat the report on the Patriot Act by
Larry Anderson be moved to the first part of the agenda.
IX. New ness
B. Patriot Act Information
Larry Anderson gave a brief history on intelligence gathering in the
United States. With the new technolory of the Internet there has
been debate on the need for broader authority. He explained
current intelligence gathering powers such as "roving wire tap",
"pen register", and "trap and trace". The Federal government
thinks these powers should extend to the Internet. The ACLU
maintains that it is an invasion of privacy.
As pertains to the library, a warrant is necessar5r before any
information may be released. Patron registration is conlidential
but law enforcement would have a right to sign-up lists for use of
the Internet. If we keep records ttrey must be kept for two years
according to State law. Reference does no tracking of subject
researched linked to patrons.
President Herman suggested that ttre subject be tabled until the
next meeting. Subjects for further consideration are: (1) whether to
keep sign-up sheets for Internet reservations or consider some
other more €rnon5rrnous means of reserving use. (2) should signage
noti$,ing patrons of possible surveillance be posted.
Corresoondence and Attachments
The remainder of ttre correspondence and attachments were reviewed.
From the Floor- None
VII. Reportg
A. City Llbrariants Report - Al Escoffier reviewed his report and the
November/ December statistics. Issues discussed were:
1. Funding Capital Improvements - If funding for capital outlay is
limited this year the Board of Trustees may look to other sources
for funding.
2. www.Tutor.com, a State Library grartt-funded program, will
begin in March. There will be a six month pilot program
spearheaded by Barry Mills and Pat Harding. T?rere was discussion
regarding partnering with schools so that students might access
this program from their school. The board members asked for a
report on this program at the end of the six months. They also
asked if it would be available in other languages.
c
Library Board of Trustees Minutes
February 19, 2OO2
V.
VI
B. System Advlsory Report - Agendize Appointment of the
Burlingame Representative - Al Escoffier suggested that Mary Lou
Morton could be reappointed as our System Advisory Board
representative. A1 will check with Mary Lou. The matter was tabled
until the next meeting
C. Foundatlon Report - Dunbar
The Duncan Trust statement was reviewed.
uII Unfinished Business
A. Duncan Trust Status - Discussed under item a, section 5.
New Buslness
A. Elegant Affalr Fundralser
At present tJle Elegant Affair fundraiser is planned for either a Friday
or Saturday evening in October. T?rere was discussion on the
advantages and disadvantages of each day. Trustee Gurthet asked
which day had more patron use. He is concerned about upsetting
patrons with an unexpected closure of tl.e library. Al will check on
that aspect of closure of the library.
B. Patrlot Act Information- Moved to item b, section 5 at request
of President Herman.
C. Flag Pole Gift - Acceptance
It was moved to accept this generous gift from the Lions Club. M/S/C
(Coar/ Gurthet). Tfustee Dunbar suggested that a tJrank you letter
should be written and sent expressing the trustee's appreciation for
their continued support and the assurance that the Lion's Den would
have a presence in the renovated building.
D. Budget Report - Escoffrer
The city's revenues have fallen sigrrificantly beginning last summer
due to a loss in TOT (Transient Occupancy Tax). This will affect both
the current year and next year's budget.
Ix.
E. Strateglc Planning Proposal Funding - Duncan/ Special Fund
Ttrere was a motion to authorize funding of the Strategic Planning
Proposal up to $1o,ooO from the Trustees Special Fund. M/S/C
(Dunbar/ Gurthet)
F. Business Card Order
New business cards will be printed with the new email addresses and
new phone numbers for staff and trustees.
Library Board of Trustees Minutes 3
February 19,2OO2
X. Announcements
A. Statewlde Trustees Conference
There are two spaces available at the State Conference in Sacramento.
President Herman recommended this conference. Trustee Gurthet
would like to attend. A1 will check with Ttustee McCormack.
B. Retlrement Dinner
Trustee Dunbar suggested having a dinner for retired Board
members, Kris Cannon and Jeff Berger immediately following the
March 19th Board meeting.
XI Adiournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:5O pm. M/S/C (Gurthet/ Dunbar). A1
gave tJee Board members copies of the proposed design plans for the
Easton Branch renovation.
Respectfully Submitted
0//2N1fu^
Alfred H. Escoffier
City Librarian
Library Board of Tfllstees Minutes
February 19, 2OO2
4
The City of Burlingame
CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
CALTFORNTA 9401G3997
www.burlingame.org
TRAFFIG, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - UnaPProved
Thursday, March 14, 2AO2
Commissioners Present: Jim Mclver, Chair
Russ Cohen
Commissioners Absent: Jim Evans, Vice Chair
Lisa De Angelis
David Mayer
StaffPresent:
Staff Absent:
Visitors:
Frank Erbacher, Assistant Director of Public Works
Homayoun Barekat, Traffic Engineer, Public Works
Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works
Officer Ken Tamurq Police Deparhnent
Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Deparhrent
Corine Hubsher, 9 Dwight Road,Burlingame
James Peters, 18 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame
Sonya Peters, 18 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame
Paul Leininger,9 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame
Carol Leininger,9 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame
Carla Sebretti, 10 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame
Christopher Mufloa 1428 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame
Kristina McCleary,323 Dwight Road, Burlingame
Robin Richardson, 460 8.19tr Ave. #6, San Mateo
Stacey Murray, 305 Old County Road #144, Belmont
Carol Terrones,2583 Wentworth Dr., San Bruno
Richard Terrotres,2583 Wentworth Dr., San Bruno
Daniel Newgren, 6203 Quicksilver Ave., Newark
S. Mey, 2332Castic Place, Santa Clara
James Miranda, 1240 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame
Renee Harrell, 1240 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame
Jennifer Castello, 3 94 Lexington Way, Burlingame
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday , March 14,2002
Visitors: (cont'd)John Roman,2839 Arguello Drive, Burlingarne
Danielle Roman, 2839 Arguello Drive, Burlingame
Jimmie Jaber,2831 Arguello Drive, Burlingame
Rose Jaber,283l Arguello Drive, Burlingame
Mary Cotter, 2847 kguello Drive, Burlingame
Joe Cowan,1657 Rollins Road, Burlingame
Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, Burlingame
The City of Burlingame Page 2
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, March 14, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m.by Chair Mclver.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 2 of 5 Commissioners present. There was no quorum; so no action was taken.
4. CURRENT BUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4.1.1 Minutes for February 14,2@l2, were submitted.
4.1.2 1710 Trousdale Drive - Blue tlandicappedZone in front of ramp
The petitioner was not present. Mr. Barekat advised the petitioner now is requesting a green zone
instead of a blue zone. This will be on the Agenda next month if they still want a blue zone.
4.1.3 Installation of a Green Zone on Bloomfield Road north of Peninsula Avenue
Testimony was received from the floor: Mr. Terrones: Regardless of where the green zone is,
parents will continue to drop off and pick up their kids, the parking stalls on the property cannot
be reconfigured to add one more stall, so a green zone on Bloomfield or Peninsula is needed, also,
the school should encourage parents to walk their kids to school. School owner, Ms. Hubsher,
iterated that the green on Peninsula is ideal and have had no accidents in the last 3 years, the green
zone is only neededT-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.r., she has 13 employees: 3 take the bus, I walks and the
9 who drive, park on Arundel, also, they have a dumpster in the parking lot so has 9 spaces which
are always empty for drop off and pick up. Mr. Newgren said green zone is needed at peak times.
Ms. Richardson zubmitted a letter io the commission with pictures and a petition attached. When
she picks up or drops offher niece, she must carry a car seat, a diaper bag, and various sundries,
plus the baby which is too much to have to walk any distance. Ms. I*ininger lives on Bloomfield
next door to the school and has 3 children. She objects to a green zone on Bloomfield since it will
increase the traffic flow on this street. She expects cars to use her driveway to facilitate a u-turn
to access the green zone on Bloomfield. A solution is to increase spaces in the private lot or
stagger the time for picking up and dropping off. Mr. kininger stated he has lived here 22yearc
and can seldom park in front of his home on Bloomfield. Businesses must accommodate the
zoning, especially if it is a growing business. Many cars from the San Mateo side of Peninsula
park on Bloomfield. The centerline on Peninsula should be moved over to accommodate another
westbound lane. He suggested enlarging the school's driveway apron so cars can circle in and out.
Agrees with a timed green zone in school's front area with an attendant available to take the
children into and out of the school. Ms. Murray said Peninsula traffic is too fast but the green
zone on Peninsula is the shortest route for the kids. Also, she doesn't like the idea of dropping off
children to an attendant.
The City of Burlingame Page 3
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, March'14, 2AO2
Mr. Peters observed lot use and number of drop offs on various days:2115, 7 cars in the lot, 49
cars dropped off; 2118, 7 cars in the lot, 3 on Peninsula; 2119, M cars dropped off, 4 on
Peninsula; 212A,44 cars picked up, 5 cars on Peninsula, spaces available in lot. Believes owner
should asphalt dirt area in lot and re-stripe making 12 spaces. This would make a green zone on
Bloomfield unnecessary. At 5: 15 p.m. there are cars parking on westbound Peninsula across from
the restaurants a few blocks eastward, and there's no safety issue there. Even with a green zone
on Bloomfield, people will park on Peninzula. Parking in the evening on the San Mateo side is
available. Ms. Richardson measured the school's lot which is 32' wide by 50' long; and with
space needed for cars to back up, no more spaces can be added. The owner stated that there is no
need to asphalt the dirt area because parents already use that area anyway. She has 68 kids in
school being dropped offand picked up everyday. Ms. McCleary asked if traffrc safety overrides
school safety. She has noticed that traffrc on Peninsula has increased in the last 10 years; and
feels, we must compromise. She likes the green zone on Bloomfield with time limitation. Even
though cars will stop and wait to circle for space on Bloomfield, residents should use their own
driveways and garages rather than the City street for parking. Ms. Abbey stated the residents have
a right to have parking spaces available on their street for visitors.
Mr. Erbacher advised that if a green zone is installed on Bloomfield, it would be timed for the
peak period. The centerline on Peninsula may be able to be moved by making the curb larrre 12 feet
wide and the other lane 10 feet wide. Mr. Barekat suggested the possibility of a special meeting
for this issue be held before the regular April meeting since we have no quonrm this evening.
4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.2.1 1240 Paloma Avenue - lruer regarding Blue Handicapped Zone
The petitioner was present and stated that they have a two-car garage for their two cars; but her
husband's work truck is too long for the driveway. He is permanenfly disabled, so theyte asking
for a blue zone close to their house so he doesn't have to walk far after work every night. They
noticed that there is a blue zone also on the 1300 block of Paloma.
4.2.2 1100 Carolan - ktter regarding maintaining existing 2-hour parking and adding 2-hour
parking along new curbing
Petitioner was not present.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS.
5.1 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extension
Joe Cowan of the SFPUC stated that an employee at another site was killed when struck by a car while
exiting that site's driveway. This site was surveyed and they determined that they need an extension
of one existing red zone to eliminate parking near the driveway which would facilitate exiting the
The City of Burlingame Page 4
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, March 1 4, 2002
driveway with a good view of cross traffic which tends to move at over 35 mph. Also, a second red
zone needs repainting.
Officer Tamura advised that Rollins Road is now on selective enforcement due to this request.
Mr. Erbacher advised that the City will notice the neighborhood of this request for the next meeting.
5.2 1309 North Carolan Avenue - Request for Red Zone
The petitioner was not present.
5.3 Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive - Request for 3-Way Stop Signs
Mr. Roman submitted a signed petition for this request. He stated that there are numerous blind spots
for drivers accessing this intersection which is a hazard for the neighborhood children and for cars
backing out of their driveways at this site. Also, there has been an increase in school traffic for the
Franklin School. Ms. Cotter stated her home is at this intersection which is on the crest of a hill; and
with the police upping their enforcement on Trousdale, more drivers are using Arguello now.
Accessing her driveway is becoming more haratdous.
Mr. Barekat advised that the centerline needs to be replaced and he will request it. Comm. Cohen
asked if the increased traffic is due to the temple nearby. Mr. Roman stated no, it's due to avoidance
now of Trousdale and increased school traffic.
5.4 Dwight Road at kxington Way - Request for Stop Sign
Ms. Castello complained of speeders on Dwight Road. One driver went so fast, she crashed into her
fro t irard tree to avoid hitting an on-coming car. She feels a stop sign would slow down drivers. Mr.
Barekat advised that there are existing Yield signs at this intersection.
5.5 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to determine
whether trafflrc-calming measures are warranted
Officer Tamura submitted their Sekctive Enforcement resits which showed 15 citations issued and
three warnings.
5.6 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail)
5.7 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition)
Mr. Mufloz stated he lives on the 1400 block where the number of parked cars allows only one driving
lane so drivers go slow. Chair Mclver stated that construction trucks are a problem, too.
The City ol Bud Eame Page 5
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, March 1 4, 2OO2
5.8 2415 Adeline Drive - ktter regarding Traffic Concerns related to Sisters of Mercy Iocale
Ms. Abbey thanked staff for the addition of centerline dots on Adeline; however, they still have
speeders and heavy traffic with most traffic going to and from the Mercy campus. She wants Mercy
to re-open their mair gate. AIso, she would like to have a solid yellow centerline on various blocks
of Adeline. Speeders are driving over the newly installed centerline dots increasing noise pollution.
6. FROM THE FLOOR - No comments.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS.
7.1 From Staff to Commission
7 .1.2 Traffrc Engineer's Report
Mr. Barekat advised that the City received a low bid for the traffic signal and pedestrian signal
for Califomia Drive. Also, the Residential Traffic Calning Program goes before the City Council
on March 18 for their approval. A speed hump policy will be introduced in April and notices will
be sent out in advance of that meeting.
Mr. Barekat announced that he is resigning effective March 15e to work in another city. Chair
Mclver thanked him for all his work and wished him well. Mr. Erbacher also thanked Mr.
Barekat for his expertise in producing the RTCP for Burlingame.
7.1.3 StaffAction l,og
Mr. Erbacher advised that 2520 Poppy Drive has been completed with a yellow zone.
7.2 Frcm Commission to Staff
7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests - None.
7.2.2 Comments and communication
Chair Mclver stated that on March 286, he will attend a Millbrae-BART Advisory Commission
meeting in an advisory capacity. The meeting will be in the back of Millbrae City Hall at 7 p.m.
7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, April 11, 2002 meeting - None.
The City of Burlingame Page 6
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, March 1 4, 2OO2
8. INACTIVE ITEMS.
8.1 Request for traffic control on Dwight Road
Mr. Erbacher stated he received plans from the designer and will review them soon.
8.2 Millbrae BART Station - Potential Impacts on City streets
8.3 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive
at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOP sign on
Trousdale at Quesada Way. Results of Traffrc Data Gathering - Speed limits
Officer Tamura submitted ther Selective Enforcement results which showed 33 citations issued and
seven wamings.
9. AGENDIZE FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
Due to no quorum, March Agenda items will remain for next month's meeting.
10. ADJOURNMENT. 9:20 p.m.
The City ot Bulingame Page 7
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
April 8,2002
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
ilI. MINUTES
V.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the public.
Chairman Vistica called the April 8,2002, regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Osterling and
Vistica
Absent: Commissioner Keele
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Ruben Huriry City
Attomey, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza
The minutes of the March 25,2002 Planning Commission Meeting were
approved as mailed were approved as mailed by a voice vote 6-0- I (C. Keele
absent). Chairman Vistica noted several changes to the Minutes of the
Special meeting of March 6,2002,those minutes were amended to read: "p.
3 ; GENERAL, bullet 5. . . like to point out that commission has been voicing
concerns about this project for several years and has been ignored, all this
concern has been voiced by the community but the DEIR does not find any
significant impacts, it makes the project seem like a benign little project,
needs to be revisited; P. 4; AESTFIETICS, COMPATABILITY, MAS S AND
SITING, bullet 9... the initial study in the back of the Draft EIR noted that
aesthetics was considered potentially significant, but this is not mentioned
elsewhere,p lease clarify; and p. 5; WEB BASED DELIVERIES, bullet 1 . . .
the EIR has no reference to the proposal for web-based home deliveries,
needs to be articulated in the report there would be less pedestrian shopping,
more small trucks, higher kip volume and more large truck deliveries; would
like to see a complete analysis of the project which includes the Web Based
Delivery Business Plan projected volumes.". No other changes were
proposed . Chairman Vistica moved the approve the March 6 minutes as
amended; C. Osterling seconded the motion. The motion passed on a voice
vote 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent).
IV.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
VI. STUDY ITEMS
920 MORRELL AVENUE _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR FENCE EXCEPTION AND
VARIANCE FOR PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS TO ALTER AN EXSTING ATTACIIED GARAGE
(RAY BRAYER, APPLICANT, DESIGNERAND PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA
LEWIT
CP Monroe presented a sunmary of the staff report. Commissioners had the following questions and
coflrments
' When was the driveway removed/abandoned? why was the driveway removed?. Was the driveway removed by the current or a previous olvner?. When was the fence built?. Plans should clearly document the number of bedrooms in the house;
' Where do the fence height requirements change on this property? Provide diagram on site plan;
' Applicant should provide other examples of garage doors at property line in Burlingame;
' Noticed several 130-watt light bulbs on the fence posts, light from these bulbs extends past the
property line and violates the residential illumination ordinance, needs to be corected;
' Applicant has not identified a hardship, need to look at hardship finding more seriously;
' Not normally grant variances when there are other solutions, could replace the driveway, build new
code compliant garage with access off Linden Avenue, or add curb cut at north end of property with
a driveway to the back of the garugq there are many solutions which will not need a variance;
' Existing site plan indicates that there is an existing shed attached to the rear ofthe garage, it appears
that on the proposed site plan the shed is being incorporated into the garage, please clariff;
' Please clarifr if window in the walk-in closet in being increased in size; and
' On Adeline Drive there are numerous examples of garages immediately off the sidewalk, like
landscaping and open space in the front yard, provides a direct access and reduces paving;
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submiued and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ONTHECqNSENTCALENDARARECqNSIDEREDTIBERIUTINE. THEvARE
ACTED ON SIMULTANEOUSLY WLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION IS RESUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PNOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON TITE MOTION
TO ADOPT,
There were no items for review on the Consent Calendar.
1
2
VIII. RE,GULAR ACTION ITEM
2.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
1415 BENITO AVENUE - ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW DETAC}IED GARAGE (JOHNNY DAROSA, DAROSA AND
ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; PETER AND SHIRLEY CHIANG, PROPERTY
Reference staff report,04.08.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Johnny DaRosa, DaRosa & Associates, designer, and Peter
Chiang, were present to answer questions, noted that this is a completely new design. Commission noted a
concern with the ll' x 12' second floor deck offthe master bedroom, concerned about privacy and view into
other yards, asked the designer if he would consider reducing the size of the deck, typically see a six foot
deep deck, would have to cut dec[ in half; designer noted that the deck could be reduced; Commission noted
that vinyl double-glazed windows will be used and asked if they will have divided lights? Designer noted
that the windows will be custom made to match the existing style; Commission noted that this project has
come a long way and asked the designer how did the design review process work? Designer noted that the
process worked very well, has worked with all of the consultants on different projects, each consultant has
their own preference, provide solutions of benefit to the property owner.
Randy Vandenbrink,l4l2 Alvarado Avenue, noted that he would like to see a condition added that the
basement height be measured before a building permit is issued, tree at the rear of the property is in poor
condition, has vines growing on it and appears to be dying, City Arborist inspected the tree, would like to see
a condition added that an arborist report be provided to protect the existing tree during construction, if the
tree is ever taken out will be able to see the deck, wrought iron railing is out of character, prefer to see solid
wall of stucco to prevent seeing anything stored on deck, this is a better project, not overwhelming one way
or the other, built to maximum regulations; Commission noted that the wrought iron railing is consist
around the house, solid stucco railing will make the house look massive, hedges would screen the deck;
neighbor noted he would rather see a solid wall than materials stored on deck.
Designer noted that the trees in the rear yard will not be removed, will maintain for privacy, trees screen
deck from neighbor, used wrought iron railing to reduce the mass and bulk, could do a combination of stucco
wall and iron railing on the deck. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Boju6s noted that the designer has done a nice job and moved to approve the application, by resolution,
with the following amended conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to
the Planning Department date stamped March l2,2002,sheets I - 6, and that any changes to the footprint or
floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2) that any changes to the size or
envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),
moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, replacing the
decorative iron with stucco shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the City Engineer's,
Chief Building Official's, and Recycling Specialist's December 3,2001, memos shall be met;4) thatthe
project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires
affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet
recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a
demolition permit;5) that the large existing tree at the rear of the site shall be inspected and an arborist report
provided which indicates ways to protect the large existing tree during construction; the inspection shall be
aJ
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
completed and arborist report submitted and approved by the city arborist before a building permit is
issued;6. that the basement ceiling height shall be less than 6'-0" in height and shall be measured and
confirmed by a building inspector at time of a foundation inspection, should the ceiling height be greater
than 6'-0" the floor shall be raised by apermanent method approved bythe Building Official beforethenext
inspection is scheduled for the project; 7) that the second floor deck at the rear of the house shall extend a
maximum of 6'-0" from the second floor wall and shall have a wrought iron railing which matches the iron
railings on the rest of the house; and 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California
Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion
was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Comment on the motion: would it make sense to require replacement of the large tree at the rear if it is in
poor condition if its life is limited; no.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion
passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m.
3. 520 FRANCISCO DRIVE _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (TOM HALLENDORF, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
FRED STRATHDEE. ARCHITECD (55 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Reference staffreport , 04.08.A2, with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission noted that
the this project is two sqwre feet below the maximum allowed floor area ratio, can a condition be added that
the FAR be double-checked? CP noted thatacondition could be added requiring a survey of the building
corners before a foundation inspection and the inspection would not be scheduled until the elevations of the
foundation installed match those shown on the approved plans.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Tom Hallendorf; applicant and Fred Strathdee, architect, were
present to answer questions, thanked the project planner and design review consultant for processing this
project, project was previously reviewed as an action item, now back again, accepted all of the design
reviewer's comments, consultant visited the site, presented four design concepts to the consultant, narrowed
it down to one design, met the six criteria of design guidelines, especially #6 regarding maintaining the
character of the existing house, time is of the essence, does not want the house exposed during the rainy
season, added a window to the existing bedroom, brought more detail and light to this side of the house.
Architect considered moving the addition over by one to two feet, but prefer to have more open space on the
other side of the house.
Commission asked if applicant will be the contractor for this job and how long has he lived in this house;
applicant noted that he will be the contractor, he just bought the house and plans on living here. There were
no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling noted that this project has come a long way, the north wall has been broken up nicely, and that
the applicant has addressed the Commission's concems, and moved to approve the application, by
resolution, with the following amended conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
submitted to the Planning Departrnent date stamped April 1, 2002, Sheets I through 3, site plan, floor plans
and building elevations; 2) that any changes to the Size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors,
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
which would include adding or enlarging a donner(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height orpitch, shall be subjectto design review approval; 3) thatthe corners
of the house shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor and shall be approved by the City Engineer before a
foundation inspection scheduled; 4) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition
Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 5) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist and
City Engineer's February 25,2A02 memo shall be met; 6) that the project shall meet all the requirements of
the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 7) that the
applicant shall contact the city and arrange and pay for planting. The tree shall be a l5-gallon sheet tree in
the planter strip at the front of the subject property; the tree shall be selected from the City of Burlingame,
Parks Division, Official Street Tree List and shall be consistent in size and growing pattem with the existing
species of trees on that block. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on the motion: applicant is an engineer and understands tolerances, feels that the applicant will
build according to the plans; spoke with the design review consultant regarding the lack of articulation on
the north wall, consultant felt that the addition was in keeping with the original design and the existing house
next door, felt that the applicant satisfied concerns, would like to add a condition that the corners of the
house be surveyed before foundation inspection to confirm compliance with the approved plan. Maker of
the motion second agreed.
Further comment: not in favor of the project, mass and articulation has not been addressed on 75' long wall
it is not in keeping with the style of the house, chimney at the rear is straight and rectangular, not consistent
with the chimney detail at the front, original house has recessed windows, looks like a box added to the
house.
Chairman Vistica called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed ona4-2-l (Cers.
Bojuds and Vistica dissenting, C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
7:50 p.m.
4.II37.II45 PALOMA AVENUE - ZONED R.3 _ APPLICATION FOR NEGATTVE DECLARATION,
FRONT SETBACK VARTANCE, VARIANCE FOR DWELLING UNITS IN THREE BUILDINGS ON
oNE LOT, AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW THREE (3) STORY, TWELVE (12) UNIT
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER, DALE MEYER ASSOCI,ATES, APPLICANT AND
ARCHITECT; FU-LEN CHENG, PROPERTY OWNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN
HI]RIN
a. Variances and Condominium Permit
b. Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Merger and Tentative Condominium Map
Referencestaffreport,04.0S.02,withattachments. PlannerHurinpresentedthereport,reviewedcriteriaand
staffcomments. Forty-two conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: this site is
close to the Broadway commercial area and on a natrow, one-way street, where will the people working on
the construction park. CE Murtuza noted for bigger projects a construction staging plan including worker
parking is required, can make this a condition of this project. There were no further questions of staff.
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer, architect represented the project. He noted that in
response to previous review they eliminated the wall which enclosed the front yard and the gates at the
driveway, removed the bridges and replaced them with archways. The apartrnent buildings on the rest ofthe
street take up most of their lots, the archways increase the uniform look which is similar to the rest of the
street. The entrance has been enhanced with corbels to add detail. Regarding the front setback variance, the
existing average without the three houses on this site is l5'-2", they are asking for a 15'-6" setback.
Commission felt that the cornmon open space was too shady so took out some of the existing trees and
replaced with shrubs to increase light access. Parking meets city code requirements, removal ofone existing
driveway will increase the number available on the street; when completed there will be 6 to7 parking spaces
on the street at the site. Building is one-quarter of a mile from the railroad station so perhaps not as much
parking is needed.
Commissioners asked: In previous review raised the issue of affordable housing, have not addressed it.
Applicant noted they received information from staffbut the city does not have a specific requirement for
affordable units now and feel that they could not proceed at this time to provide affordable units without a
city requirement; the project is increasing the number of dwelling units in the city which will help the overall
price. Commissioner noted that because there was no law did not mean that providing affordable housing
was bad policy, should address. What is the front setback of the apartment next door? l5'-1". Did you
consider additional guest parking since on-street parking in this area is almost always full; the towers are
quite tall, is it possible to lower them. Applicant noted could add more parking only if reduced landscaping
or removed a unit. What about removing a unit? Owner was concerned about the economics of the project,
number of city parking lots within a half block in two directions, these lots are not fulI so provide lots of
parking opportunity. Applicant noted that the tower could be lowered some, would be reluctant to make it
flush with the other roof line because it provides articulation in the elevation. Purpose of the outdoor
corlmon area is to be useable to residents, what you have provided is what is left over after you sited the
maximum building size, lot coverage is maximum, units are large, building is nicely ornamented, height is
right at maximum 3 5 feet, after lowered on site 2 %feet. Tower space is not useable, could make it lower so
not dominate ridge line and then you could raise the building so the entrances arc atnatural grade which is
more in keeping with the neighborhood. Where will all the meters go and the backflow? Applicant noted :
felt that the common open space was at the best location , west side, rear; felt that passive area would
provide future users more flexible use; could lower the tower and raise building out of the ground would
alter the entire appearance of exterior; lot is zoned for medium density 12-30 units to tlre acre, project is on
the lower end, reducing the density (remove unit) is contrary to zoning1' did not want underground parking,
there is none in this neighborhood. Should look at connecting drain directly to storm drain in street. The
plant code shown on the landscape plan does not correspond to what is called out, please check and be sure
all match, especially the larger trees, might show Linden street trees on front elevation. Need vertical
element but also need to split entrance so it is level with grade, it is move inviting.
Members of the Public: Rudolph Horak, Burlingame Hills; Sandra L'Heureux, I I l3-l I 15 Paloma: want to
stay in the area and live near Broadway, units in new condominium on Capuchino are too small 1000 to
I100 SF, these units are a good size for two people 1500 to 2000 SF, 5 public lots within %block- 150
parking spaces, often underused; unreasonable to request affordable unit when only 12 units in complex,
these will be affordable at $500,000 to $600,000; will there be an electrical meter for each unit; 9 foot
ceilings are very attractive. There are 24 properties from Broadway on this part of Paloma, almost all
developed with multiple units, concerned with traffic, adding more units will compound the problem, can't
park on week-ends. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
6
City of Burlingome Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
Commission comment: there is an utility easement behind this property, can it be used for additional
parking? CE noted these areas are hard to access, full of utilities, must be accessible at all times, do not use
even in public parking lots. There are a number of issues which the architect needs time to work on, needs
to come back with a revised design; would like to see parking plan during construction, how will materials
be delivered, location of tradesman parking; residents and business noticed in advance for demolition;
project does not need a front setback variance; concerned with parking, stepped down design has effect of
lifting the building, needs more common area; variance means a hardship on the property, with a new
structure where is the hardship, if going to give an exception need something in retum, affordable housing.
C. Auran moved to deny this application without prejudice. Seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: would you consider continuing this item to give the applicant a chance to respond?
Maker and second agreed to amend the motion to a continue the item.
Additional comments: sensible to have parking belowthe grade, lowers the mass; building needs to read as if
it is at street level, parking a little lower is OK; moderate income housing is $400,000 staffnoted this varies
by county. CA noted that owner does not need to sell the affordable unit it could be a permanent rental
managed by an outside agency. Concerned about the towers, prefer to lift the building to grade, would like
more open space, if accommodate front setback eliminate variance existing open space is OKay. Mass and
bulk is an issue, if address could support application for a variance since setback is similar to existing on
block, raising the building would make it apart of the street pattem. Add street trees to the elevation.
5.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this time to the item when revisions have
been submitted and reviewed by staff. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent) voice vote. The
continuance applies to the Tentative Map application as well. This item concluded at 9:00 p.m.
1344 BURLINGAME AVENUE - ZONED C.1, SUBAREA A _ APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR
SIGN HEIGHT FOR A NEW WALL SIGN (ALAN FORD, C/O FLUORESCO, APPLICANT;
CHANDLER SIGNS, DESIGNER; NAGHI HATAMI, PROPERTY owNER) (46 NOTICED) PROJECT
PI,ANNER:CATHERINE KEYI,ON
Reference staff report,04.08.02,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments. Staff noted that this was a resubmittal and no changes had been made to the project. Four
conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Alan Ford, 1290 Waterfall Way, Concord and Doug Hallen,
Chandler Sign Company representing the applicant owner of Lucky Brand Jeans store presented the project.
Have not installed the sign on the transom, it is difficult to illuminate but not impossible; that sign is the
same as the one proposing on the wall2'-4" higher; prefer the sign higher on the building it will look better
and it will be easier to illuminate; the visibility ofthe store is poor with the present sign, critical to add a sign
to the front of the store someplace; brought a letter "L" which is the largest on the sign, open neon, for
commission to see, plugged it in . Can put a Plexiglas cover over open neon to diffuse light, reduce
brightness; can also ask client about removing sub-copy; the clover is outlined in open neon tubing; pulpose
is to distinguish the store. Commission asked how bright is this sign compared to others on the Avenue.
Applicant said he did not measure, lots of different signs on Avenue, could cover face so not see neon,
would reduce intensity 50-60%. Consider reducing sign size? Could eliminate trademark, smaller letters
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
are only 4 to 5 inches now. Applicant felt principal issue was height, surprised about questions about design.
Has applicant thought about removing the blade sign and putting up this wall sign? Most ofthe stores have
both kinds, the problem is the design of this store front, useable fascia is over l2feet,hardship is the design
of the building, across street don't know where the store is without wall sign. Alternative illumination?
Could do a neon halo, not want to place on transom covers and costs more to install. Not all the letters on
the blade sign are illuminated. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was
closed.
Commissioner discussion: do not see the hardship for a variance, applicant wants an illuminated billboard,
have a good sign with store name clearly visible; have lucky on the windows, will see a big neon sign a long
distance; if grant this variance other merchants will want the same consideration. Could accept with proper
diffusion of light, if applicant can confirm what it would look like, can continue item and have him answer
concerns expressed.
Commission issues:
o Illumination- already have two lit signs, why would more not harm the Avenue, too bright for the
Avenue.
o Size can be reduced or other sign removed document window signs.
. If sign is placed above transom should be because others are have signage above 12 feet.
o Can reduce sign and have no illumination
. Would like to see the actual brightness of the sign, can that be arranged some how? Could put fabric
or paper sign to scale on the wall for a short time as a mock up.
Some one made an error in using so much of the square footage allowed over 12' in the blade sign, that is
not justification for a variance, do not see hardship, place a sign above the transom but reduce the blade sign
size.
C. Brownrigg moved to continue this application to give the applicant an opportunity to provide more
information and respond to commission's concems. The motion was seconded by C. Boju6s.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item so the applicant can respond to
commission's concerns. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised.
This item concluded at 9:30 p.m.
6. 1881 ROLLINS ROAD - ZONED M-l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
LANDSCAPE VARTANCE FORA GYM USE (TONY LOTTICE AND PATIL FERRARI, APPLICANTS;
TAMARA ICARDI DESIGNS, DESIGNER; SJ AMOROSO PROPERTIES CO., PROPERTY OWNER)
ae PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Reference staff report,04.08.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Seven conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if
building was built before the 600/o front setback landscaping was required; yes.
Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Tony Lottice, applicant and Josh Amoroso, properly owner,
were present to answer questions, noted that he tried to address the Commission's concems. Commission
asked the applicant to provide a landscape plan, plan does not show irrigation or species ofplants and trees,
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
hard to tell what is being proposed; Planner Hurin noted that staffdirected the applicant to generally show
the landscape ilsas and trees; property owner noted that a landscape company currently maintains the site
landscaping; Commission noted that a landscape variance is difficultto grant and is opposed to it, asked if
additional trees could be planted at the front, some paving could be removed to add some trees. Applicant
noted that he did not want to take away parking spaces or affect on.site truck maneuvering by adding
landscaping, also needs parking spaces when space in middle building is leased; Commission zuggested that
large trees or shrubs be planted instead of a lawn at the front, the use is appropriate for this site but would
like to see additional landscaping. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Boju6s noted that because of the layout of buildings on this site and the limitations it creates, moved to
approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be
built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March 29,2002, site
plan and floor plan; 2) thatthe gym shall operate as indicated in the application dated stamped March 13,
2002, with hours of operation from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week, and no more than 4
employees; the gym shall be used for basketball only, any change to the operation ofthe business, including
expanding hours of operations or services offered shall be broughtto the Burlingame Planning Commission
for approval; 3) thatl,772 SF of landscaping in the front setback area and 12,688 SF of total on-site
landscaping shall be property maintained and inigated; 4) that two 24-inch box size large scale trees,
selected from the City's Offrcial Tree List, shall be planted within the front setback area; 5) that the
landscape variance shall become void if there is any expansion to the existing of the buildings on site or if
any of the buildings are removed; 6) that the conditions of Chief Building Official's February 26,2002
memo shall be met;7) that there shall be no more than 30 people (including staff and parents) on-site atarry
one time; 8) that the applicant shall purchase and maintain dailS more often if necessary, trash receptacles
on-site which will be placed by the door in front ofthe gym; 9) that all existing and proposed landscape areas
will be irrigated regularly and will require ongoing maintenance including weed control and replacement of
plant materials as necessary to maintain the landscape design; and l0) that the project shall meet all the
requirements of the Califomia Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on the motion: two trees to be planted in the front setback should beZ4-inchbox size of a larger
scale to fill in the space, trees should be selected from the City's official tree list, feel that more landscaping
should be added so that a variance is not required, could remove some asphalt and add trees, currently
working on specific area plan for this area, landscape variance will affect what is trying to be accomplished
by the specific area plan; landscaping could be added to a triangular area adjacent to space #80, but in many
cases there is a shortage of parking, will need parking spaces if another use is added in vacant building,
reluctant to remove parking for trees, there is not enough area to add enough landscaping to offset the
variance, would like to see the variance eliminated, could add a planter bed in front of spaces #80-85 and
next to space #79; need to consult with Bekins before adding trees, would not want to plant trees and then
have them run over by trucks, could be a problem; should consider irrigation, will be difficult to irrigate
small isolated landscape areas, this is a pre-existing condition, not opposed to variance. CP noted that a
condition could be added that the variance is void if the buildings are demolished; this is a good idea,
landscape variance will become void if there is any expansion to the envelope or removal of any building.
The maker and second of the motion agreed adding these conditions.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele
absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:55 p.m.
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
330 CLARENDON ROAD _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AS S OCI,ATES, APPLICANT AND
ARCHITECT; JERRY AND JORDANA PEIL, PROPERTY OWNERS (69 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: CA KEYLON
7
Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, 1351 Laurel Street, San Carlos, and
Jerry and Jordan Peil, property owners, were present to answer questions; architect noted that this is a
straight forward addition with no variances; property owner noted he talked to neighbors about the proposed
addition before hiring an architect, provided a petition signed by the neighbors in support; Commissioner
suggested that the washer and dryer be moved from the garage to the house, owners agreed with the
suggestion; architect noted that all windows will match and will use traditional wood stucco mold trim and
wood windows as shown on the plans.
David Jonson, 336 Clarendon Road, noted that he objects to the project, has a small house and small rear
yard, second story will look into his yard, bedroom and kitchen, concemed with loss ofprivacy, will devalue
his property, does not object to a second story addition if it was built within the existing footprint,
understands their need to accommodate a growing family but can be done without invading his privacy,
concemed about windows on the second floor, will look into his bedroom.
Jim Steiner,326 Clarendon Road, and John Parkin, 333 Dwight Road, spoke in favor of the project, noted
that the owners spoke to him about the addition, design is tasteful, architect has worked on many other
houses in the neighborhood, likes the design since it will help to reduce wind and noise, will increase
property value, large trees at rear yard will screen the addition, project is not overdone.
Property owner noted that landscaping will be added to help screen the addition and add privacy, has existing
windows on the left side already facing the neighbor, have happily co-existed for several years.
The Commission had the following comments and concerns to be addressed by the applicant and noted on
the plans:
Move the dryer/washer from the garage to the inside ofthe house, will eliminate the nonconforming
width dimension in the garage;
Add a window in the second floor master bathroom on the left side elevation to eliminate the blank
wall, consider using obscure glass; and
Should strengthen landscaping by adding larger size shrubs or trees on each side of the house, will
help to screen the addition and provide privacy.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
a
a
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
C. Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the suggested
revisions have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded C. Auran.
Comment on motion: this is a good example, in regards to privacy this is not a hillside area construction
permit and therefore no views are affected, Burlingame lots are small, all neighbors have to deal with
privacy by using blinds, curtains, shutters, etc., design is appropriate, property owner has a right to build a
second story addition ifit is in scale, suggested that this project be placed on the consent calendar.
The maker and second of the motion agreed to place this item on the consent calendar.
Comment on the motion: might consider swapping the master bedroom and study room to reduce the impact
on the neighbor, addition at this location has the least impact, privacy is not in the Commission's purview,
but appropriate landscaping will be effective.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Keele absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:25 p.m.
8.1540 HOWARD AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT
AND ARCHITECT; EARL GUSTAFSON, PROPERTY OWNER (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
SEAN O'ROURKE
Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, l35l Laurel Street, San Carlos, and Earl
Gustafson, property owner, were present to answer questions, noted that the property owner talked to the
neighbors regarding the addition, submitted a petition signed by neighbors in support of the project.
The Commission had the following comments and concerns to be addressed by the applicant and noted on
the plans:
Concemed with left side elevation, suggested that the applicant consider adding more than a belly
band for articulation along this side;
Only one bay window on the left side elevation breaks up the structure horizontally, architect should
study the left side elevation more; and
Suggest planting trees in smaller containers, they will grow faster.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Boju6s noted that the architect has done a nice job with the design and made a motion to place this
item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions have been made and plan checked.
This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
a
a
a
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plals
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Keele absent). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:31 p.m.
9. 1537 DRAKE AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGENCE OF THREE PARCELS, DESIGN REVIEW,
SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT FOR TWO HOUSES AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING
HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR ONE HOUSE TO CONSTRUCT THREE NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH DETACHED GARAGES (OTTO MILLER, APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER;
PROJECT PLA
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked: the environmental review
should address events during construction; can staff get information on the existing setbacks, square footage
etc. of the development on the site now; the arborist should address the rooting in the driveway for the
middle house proposed, this should be evaluated and necessary mitigation proposed. There were no other
questions from the commission.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Michael Kendal and James Chu architect, and Otto Miller,
propertyowner,representedtheproject. Theypresentedarenderingoftheproject,asbuilt,brieflyreviewed
the findings of the arborist's report, noting that they had worked around the redwood trees and still
developed a house within the city's guidelines. They noted the large number of new trees they were
proposing to add to each lot. The existing house is 4500 SF with a number of support structures, it will be
replaced by three houses within the style of Burlingame. Between December 4 andJanuary 4,2002,they
contacted all the neighbors, they will address all the environmental issues; the encroachments of the
proposed houses are caused by the design, they are eliminating two on street parking spaces and adding two
driveways.
Commissioners asked the applicant: how long do you anticipate construction taking? About 6 to 9 months,
all three houses will be built at one time; anticipate parking problem and neighborhood impact so going to
do all construction at one time, can do some staging on site after rough grading, also park in front yards
during construction. Need to address sewer and water problems on Drake. CE noted that there have been
some recent improvements made and the city will need to do long term maintenance, can address in the
environmental document.
Chairman Vistica asked the public to comment: Liz Valardi, 1540 Drake; Natalie Taylor, 1566 Drake;
Mark Thomas, 1520 Drake; Jenna O'Neil, 1516 Drake; Margaret Whipler, 1535 Drake; Jay Garcia,156l
Drake; Dave Taylor,1566 Drake spoke. Problem is the addition of three houses in place of one existing at
the narrow end of the street, will increase traffic, cars will not be parked in the garages, live across street
have enjoyed the openness of the three lots with only one house, now have to endure 9 months of port-a-
potties on the front lawn, with three postage stamp front yard across the street in the end. This is a dead end
street, not a cul-de-sac, there is no bulb at the end for turning; need to listen to neighbors concems;
concemed about public health, the sewer on Drake over flows regulmly into the storm drain which flows into
the creek; city did repair four laterals recently, don't know yet if that was a band aid or the solution, this
development would add two more laterals, want to be sure that this increase in sewage will not cause
existing houses problem or impact Mills Creek. Proposed houses are 106 feet from Mills Creek, if within
JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (60 NOTICED)
ERIKA LEWIT
t2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
200 feet of a creek need special permit from Fish and Game, this should be investigate; will increase
impervious coverage with this project, water will run into storm drain, is the drain size sufficient so that
there will be no flooding of existing houses; there should be no construction debris in the creek; all property
owners on the street need unobstructed access to their houses at all times during construction, no material
should be stored or staged in the street; construction hours should be strictly limited and no construction
should occur at night or on Saturday and Sunday, there should be no noise and no vibration; with five
bedrooms these houses are not consistent in size with other houses in the neighborhood, should stay design
review until the environmental issues are resolved. There are22 structures on the stree! the median number
of bedrooms zlmong them is about 3, this proposal exceeds the historic use of a single family house and
swimming pool. Four on street parking spaces will be lost to three driveways; the increase in parking
demand will be 12 cars, since people do not use their garages for parking there will be a net loss of 4 parking
spaces with loss on street. Redwood trees are shallowrooted and easilyharmed byexcavation. The height
variances will affect the sun light to current residents; the infrastructure in the street will not support 3 more
houses, water pressure will be low and there is only one fire hydrant and it is at the end of the block. The
dead end street emphasizes the character of this street of small houses, it increases the sense of privacy.
Believe that recent trimming of the redwoods took out more that then allowed3}yo,who will monitor any
protection measures established; many people and delivery vans needing to turn in the dead end street use
the existing wider driveway serving the house, how will they do this when three smaller driveways are in
place; how many toilets, sinks, fixtures and chimneys will be added; can the site be re-divided into two lots?
Does not seem correct to require only one covered parking space for a four bedroom house, does the
building code allow this. How will the construction area be made safe for the children during demolition
and construction. If equipment or material are staged in the street the developer should be financially
penalized each time a violation occurs; the developer should have to post a bond for three years to guarantee
construction according to approved plans; there should be only two houses with three covered parking spaces
on site for each. Although it is signed by the property owner as being accurate, the environmental disclosure
form does not seem to address all the existing environmental issues, there is a school 206 feetfrom the site;
there is a storm drain 50 feet from the site, project will affect the drainage pattern in the area by adding so
much impervious surface. CA Anderson noted commission should delay design review until know that the
environmental document will not require the houses to be moved. Applicant responded that he has tried to
involve the property owners in the process, and as property owner he has property rights. Have a number of
specialists who have been involved in the project so far, am asking to replace one house and add two new
ones. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
Commissioners comment: in addition to items mentioned the following environmental issues need to be
addressed:
o Sewer and storm drain capacity and condition;o Management of construction debris and drainage during construction;
' Developer needs to prepare a parking plan to address how material will be delivered to the site so
that the street can be kept clear;
o The city's hours of construction should be confirmed, how are they enforced during construction;o Does the location ofthe creek within 200 feet ofthe site require special environmental analysis, if so
it should be done;
o Parking impacts during construction should be addressed and plan evaluated;o Environmental analysis should address the impacts with two lots as well as with the 3 lots requested;
13
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
o What will be the change in water consumption and sewage generation, is there supply, distribution
and collection capacity, what will need to be done as a result of the project;
o Environmental effect of all three proposed houses being built to the maximum, or more, ofthe code
allowances, particularly FAR;
. All the issues identified in the neighbors' letters should be addressed in the environmental analysis;o Environmental analysis should be done then the project reviewed for design;
o Tree protection should be detailed, including the driveway ofthe middle house; and atreeprotection
plan developed;
o Would like environmental evaluation to include two houses, two car garages for all houses (three);
. Review the heights, all lots are flat, houses are together so they become more visually prominent;. Since use (number of houses) is an environmental issue, it is too early to comment on design;o Potential for sewer system over flow needs to be addressed before design review; ando Requirements of NPDES need to be addressed.
Staffwas directed to prepare an environmental evaluation based on the oral and written comments received.
CA Anderson noted that can't determine design review until see environmental data sending the project to a
design reviewer too soon could cause confusion. CP Monroe noted that when the environmental review is
completed and the project is ready for design review, the city will renotice the property owners for a design
review study with public comment opportunity. This item concluded at 1l:35 p.m.
10.1205 BURLTNGAME AYENUE - ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A-APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL
DESIGN REVIEW AND VARI,ANCE FOR NUMBER OF SIGNS AND SIGN HEIGHT (SEPHORA
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, APPLICANT; THOMAS BOND, THOMAS BOND & ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECT; KARP FAMILY TRUST, PROBERTY OWNER) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
CATHERINE KEYI,ON
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked about the plans noting that the
presentation of the blade signs was confusing, could this be clarified before the project returns, Could the
height of the signs be clarified and how parts are measured, a clearer presentation would be helpful, for
example, which parts of the signs are between 12' and24'. Staffnoted that because of the fact that the two
businesses overlap primary and secondary frontages for signage, this is a difficult application to present.
Staff will take another look at presentation approach.
Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Thomas Bond, 14471Chambers Road, Tustin, represented
the project. He showed a rendering of the blade signs, noting that there is a blade sign on each frontage, the
awning sign is on the primary frontage; on the secondary frontage there are two plaques one in each arch.
The intent of the design is to bring Saphora onto the street; the front ofthe store will be redone and the entire
building repainted; they will close all the windows at the rear. The basement will be accessed only from the
hotel space. The intent ofthe signage program was to provide signage to cars and pedestrians, the blades are
needed by the pedestrians, the awning announces the nature ofthe business. Do not want the signs higher on
the building elevation, but the design of the structure dictates a natural location, want the keep the clear story
windows which go to 14 feet, have an open ceiling inside, so the sign band is the only place to put the signs.
The lighting of the signs will be will low voltage fixtures over each letter, on the secondary frontage three
fixtures will be enough to light the 7 feet of signage; the fixtures will extend 4 inches and have a 50 watt
bulb.
t4
City of Burlingame Plonning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
Commissioners asked: if the sign on the primary frontage were l5 inches smaller it would not need a sign
variance for height (that's 8 percent less). Applicant noted that they would be glad to reduce by \o/oto avoid
a variance. Can something creative be done in the two arches on the secondary frontage. Have you
considered keeping the arched windows (at clear story), they are integral to the existing building. Applicant
noted that these windows are 80 years old, wooden, and require a lot of maintenance, ifthey are not reglazed
they will leak; would prefer a cleaner look more consistent with tenant. There seem to be a lot of pigeons,
would removal of these wooden arched windows reduce the number. Applicant noted that with proposed
design they would remove all the bird wire which was place to discourage the pigeons. Are the blade signs
lit? No. Commercial design guidelines support retaining features which are integral to the fagade of the
building, the arched windows are integral, these features work together- see commercial design review item
5; more concerned with fitting Burlingame than Sephora. Applicant noted that he felt that retaining the
arched wooden muntins was subjective and he has not seen the Commercial design guidelines; tenant not
adamantly opposed to the windows, if in view of commission it is important to retain arched look would
evaluate keeping them, wanted to get rid of recessed areas which the birds like. The arches should be tied in,
can be done by matching fenestration of the existing windows. What is entry finish? Black granite at the
base with lighter stone above. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was
closed.
C. Keighran moved that the applicant seems to understand the issues and he should make the revisions
discussed and come back to an action meeting. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: sunmary of the revisions needed:
o Eliminate the signage variance for signage between 12' and24' ontheprimary frontage, reduce the
sign from 42 SF to 39 SF;
. Keep the integrity of the exterior architecture including wooden window inserts at clerestory, provide
detailed information on the window wall system;
o Provide a profile of the mullion to be used, also in the arches; and. Clariry the presentation of the signage request by frontage.
Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to put this item on the regular action calendar when
plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C.
Keele absent). The Planning Commission action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at
l2:15 p.m.
X. PLANNERREPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of April 1,2002.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions at the regular council meeting on April 1,2002. She also reviewed,
briefly, the high points of the Council's special meeting on the budget status on March 28,2002.
She noted that the loss of revenue in FY 2001-2002 would affect the capital improvements budget
for FY 2002-2003 as well as the operating budget for the Planning Department for the next Fiscal
Year.
15
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002
FYI - Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1532 Burlingame Avenue
The commissioners reviewed the request to adjust windows and approved the changes.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Vistica adjoumed the meeting in memory of Commissioner Keele's mother who passed away on
Sunday. The commissioners noted the moment. The meeting adjoumed at12:35 a.m..
Respectfu lly submitted,
Joe Boju6s, Secretary
uNAPPRovEDNan rurss4. 8
16
CITY OF BURLINGAME BAILDING INSPECTION
IJAST YEAR
TO DATE
TEIS YEAR
TO DATE
* Valuation
2 $800, ooo
0 $0
2 948, ooo
90 i3,720,3L4
21 $11,81-3,591
L2 $19,500
3 $45,000
8 s23,200
0$0
45 $604,002
13 $56, 050
15 $82,007
24 s664,7L8
MONTIILY PERMIT ACTIVITY MARCH, zOW
PermiE tIZI)e
New Single Family
New Multi-Family
New commercial
Alterations-Res
Alterations-NonRes
DemoliEion
Swimming Pool
Sign Permits
Fences
Reroofing
Repairs
Window Repl
Miscelfaneous
IEXS I.TONTE
# valuaEion
2 $800, ooo
0 $0
0 $0
30 $903,464
7 $393,636
4 $7,500
L $18,500
4 $15, 9oo
0$0
L2 $160,233
3 $1-1, 5oo
4 $22,9]-7
7 $98, o8o
IJA9T UONTE
SAI{E IrlONlE
IJAST YEAR
#
0
0
1
35
5
3
0
4
0
11
1
7
7
Valuation
$o
$o
$36, o0o
iL,362,2OO
$13 9, 610
$2, Ooo
$o
$7, 3oo
$o
$134,433
$1, 850
$42,284
$274,638
Valuation
$375, 000
$o
$o
SL, o44 , L64
$i., 155, ooo
$25, 5oo
$o
$2, 000
$o
$183,170
$47,800
s6o, 211
iL64 ,962
VaLuat,ion
i947,]-50
$o
$2, og5, ooo
$2 ,669 , glz
i2,697,25O
$37, 500
$22 , s3B
$28 ,253
$o
$46L,239
$60, 6Oo
$118,340
$529, 871
BISCN. YEAR
TO DATE
VaLuatiou
$3 ,410, ooo
$o
$ro,14g, ooo
$9, 319, L23
#LG ,728 , 499
$58, 5oo
$67,000
i64,025
$0, zoo
#2, oB7 , eg9
$74, L5o
$313,858
$l ,275 ,947
#
1
0
0
,.7
6
3
0
1
0
19
7
8
7
*
3
0
2
58
20
I
1
I
0
48
10
L4
31
#
10
0
6
230
5L
39
4
18
2
175
2L
46
56
TOTAI,S 74 i2,43L,73O '74 $2,000,315 79 $3,057,807 236 $L7,8'76,382 2L3 $9,557,558 668 $43,553,701
4/ 07/ 02 7 :36:52
I
lnvestments Par
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
o/c oI
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.
YTM
365 Equlv.Value
LAIF & County Pool
CORP NOTES
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
14,577,954.7A
3,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
14,577,954.76
3,063,750.00
13,110,610.00
14,577,954.76
3,027,780.00
13,000,000.00
47.63
9.89
42.48
1
1,596
1,700
1
486
1,251
3,271
5.929
5.354
3.317
6.0'rl
5.428
4.48030,577,954.76 30,752,314.76 30,605,734.76 100.00%880 580 4.419
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Curent Year
Average Dally Balance
Effectlve Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law,
RAHN A. BECKER, FINANCE DIR.iTREASURER
123,397.74 1,311,031.53
32,416,548.53 34,717,674.01
4.48% 5.03%
sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Totial funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:04/'10/2002 - 09:40
\
4 ro/o*-----1----/--
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details . lnvestments
March 31,2002
Purchase
Date Stated
Book Value Rate Moody's
Page2
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Average
Balance Par Value Market Value
YTM Days to
365 Maturity
Maturlty
Date
LAIF & Gounty Pool
77
79
LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.
S M COUNTY POOL
7,416,001 .33
7,161,953.43
7,416,00't.33
7,16 t,953.43
7,416,00 t.33
7,161,953.43
2.850
3.800
2.850
3.800
Subtotal and Average 14,646,833.04 't4,577,5il.7A 14,577,554.78 14,577,554.76 3,317
CORP NOTES
0739028M9
37042R2C5
487
489
BEAR STEARNS CORP
GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP
03/021999
o4l20t19Sg
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,055,000.00
1,008,750.00
1,997,500.00
1,030,280.00
6.1 50
6.750
6.1 79
5.685
701 03t022004
70 06t10t2002
Subtotal and Average 3,027,780.00 3,000,000.00 3,063,7s0.00 3,027,780.00 6.011 .AB
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
313311KK3 499
3133M3TS4 476
3133Mry75 488
3133MF209 498
3133MLMH5 505
3136F0Y29 502
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FANNIE MAE
Subtotal and Average
06/13/2001
o3117t1958
0312a1959
05t24t2001
02126t2002
0812E12001
2,000,000.00
1,000,000,00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,011,880.00
1,028,750.00
2,075,620.00
2,007,500.00
1,979,380.00
4,007,480.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5.800
6.020
6.000
5.630
4.000
5.420
5.E00
6.020
6.000
5.630
4.002
5.420
1,534
350
721
1,514
970
1 ,610
06/13/2006
03117t2003
03/222004
o5124t2006
1112612004
08t28t2006
14,741,535.&13,000,000.00 13,1 10,610.00 't3,000,000.00 5.428 1,251
Run Date: o4t10t2002 - 09:40
Total lnvestments and Average 32,416,548.53 30,577,954.76 30,752,314.7A 30,605,734.76 4.480 580
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f
1
1
I
I
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Investment Activity By Type
March 1,2002 through March 31,2002
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Beglnning
Balance
Stated
Rate
Transaction
Date
Purchasas
or Depo3lts
Sales/Maturlties
or Wlthdrawals
Ending
Balance
Page 3
LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary)
77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.79 S M COUNTYPOOL
Subtotal
2.850
3.800
0.00
303,580.22
500,000.00
0.00
14,7743A8.il 303,586.22 500,000.00 14,s77,9U.7A
CORP NOTES
Subtotal 3,027,780.00 3,027,780.00
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3133MHJ62 504 0.00 2,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal
5.550 03t28t2002
I 5,000,000,00 0.00 2,000,000.00 13,000,000,00
Total 32,E02,14/,.9 303,s86.22 2,500,000.00 30,605,734.76
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/'10/2002 . 09:40
\
Month
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity Summary
March 2001 through March 2002
Yleld to Maturity
360
Equlvalent Equlvalent
Managed
Pool365
Number
of Securltles
Purchased
Number
of Securlties
Matured / Sold
Page 4
Average
Days to MaturityEndYear
Number of
Securltles
Total
lnvostod Rate
Avorage
Term
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
200,1
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
15
14
14
13
15
14
15
12
12
12
11
11
10
34,010,zil.54
37,255,372.54
38,758,088.25
36,085,177.06
38,447,819.42
38,002,',167.12
34,930,381.22
32,614,594.78
33,056,179.95
35,671,743.12
34,732,791.56
32,802,148.54
30,605,734.76
5.963
5.737
5.609
5.431
5.396
5.287
5.352
4.880
4.812
4.629
4.497
4.441
4.419
6.046
5.817
5.687
5,507
5.471
5.361
5.426
4.948
4.879
4.694
4.559
4,503
4.480
s.869
5.417
5.200
4.767
4.632
4.4U
4.214
3.809
3.683
3.474
3.232
3.237
3.317
998
931
948
989
1,047
1,089
1,289
1,028
1,014
940
928
933
880
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
I
0
2
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
0
0
I
1
1
688
671
695
764
817
860
,020
791
763
691
662
658
580
RJn Dare: 04/1b/2002 - 09:40
Average 13 3s,151,727.91 5.1120/o 5.183%4.257 1 I,001 743
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept V5.02f
t
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
D6camber
January
February
March
1
a
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Distribution of lnvestments By Type
March 2001 through March 2002
January
2002
February
2002
March
2002
Page 5
Average
by Perlod
March
2001
MayApril June
2001
July
2001
August September
2001 2001
October November December
2001 2001 2001lnvestmenl Type 2001 2001
LAIF & Gounty Pool 36,9 42.4 41 .9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 45.0 47 .6 41 .1Yo
Gertificates of Deposit. Bank
Certificates of Deposit. S & L
Certificates of Deposit.Thrift & Ln
Negotiable CD's - Bank
CORP NOTES 8.9 8.1 7,8 E.4 7.9 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 9.9 8.7%
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper - lnterest Bearing
Commercial Paper . Discount
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 54.2 49.5 50.3 5't.3 55.9 53.9 UA 49.1 48.4 44.9 43.2 45.7 42.5 50.3%
Federal Agency lssues - Discount
Treasury Securities - Goupon
Treasury Securities . Dlscount
MiscellanEous Securities - Goupon
Miscellaneous Securities . Discount
Non lntersst Bearing lnvestments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 2
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM5) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:04/102002 - 09:40
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnterest Earnings Summary
March 31,2002
March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Page 6
GD/Coupon/Discount lnvestments :
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Eamings during Period
(
207,100,00
151,173.33
275,273.32)
0.00)
1,083,150.00
151,173.33
337,083.33)
0,00)
E3,000.01
0.00
897,240.00
1,250.00
83,000.01 898,490.00
Pass Through Securitiesl
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Period
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
lnterest Earned during Period
0.00
396,614.35
356,216.62)(
441,647.29
396,614.35
425,720.11)
40,397.73 412,541,53
Total lnterest Earned during Period
Total Gapltal Galns or Losses
123,397.74
0.00
1,309,781.53
1,250.00
,
Total Earnings during Perlod 123,397.74 1,311,031.53
Run Date: 01'1S/2002 - 09:40
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRr_PM6) SymRept V5.02f
(
(
(
(
(
(
Par
95BD
Portfolio Management
Porffolio Summary
March 31,2002
Mark6t
Value
Book
Value
Yo ot
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
380 Egulv,
YTM
365 Equlv,lnvestm€nts Value
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 100.00 1,756 532
532
4.995
4.995
5.064
800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 5.064
Total Earnlngs March 31 Month Endins Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year
Average Dally Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Rahn Becker, Finance Director/Treasurer
l/ta/oz
3,416.66
802,000,00
5.02%
30,750.00
802,000.00
5.11o/o
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Bu rlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e.9, Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PMl ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/1 0/2002 - 09:47
95BD
Portfolio Management
Porffolio Details . lnvestments
March 31,2002
Purchase
Oate Par Value
Page 2
GUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Average
Balance Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Days to
365 Maturity
Maturity
Date
LAIF
79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD.0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.7A7
Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3133M5Q89 11t24t1998 800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 5.12548sFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 819,2r8,00 802,000.00
5.064 532 09t15t2003
5.064 532
Total lnvestments and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 8,l9,2r4.00 802,000.00 5,064 532
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date: 04l7Pl20OZ - 09:47
r
lnvestments Par
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2002
Mark6t
Value
Book
Value
%ol
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM YTM
360 Equlv. 365 Equlv,Value
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
1,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1 ,710,000.00 100.00 1,826 359 5.977
5.977
6.060
1,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1,7'10,000.00 100.00% 1,826 359 5.060
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Cunent Year
Average Dally Balance
Effective Rate of Return
8,846.04
1,710,000.00
6.09%
78,001.09
1,710,000.00
6.08%
requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Pursuant to Stalp law,*"'W/t
RAHN BECKER, Finance Directorffreasurer
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/10/2002 - 09:48
I
q/s ,
cusrP lnvestment# lssuer
Average
Balance
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value
YTM Daysto
305 Maturity
Page 2
Maturity
Date
Managed Pool Accounts
80 LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND
Subtotal and Average
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124
0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.000 0
Federal Agency Coupon Securitios
3133M3XEO 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Averag€
03/26/1 998 1 ,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1 ,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 359 03/26/2003
6.060 35S1,7{ 0,000.00 1,7't 0,000.00 1,700,769.90 1,710,000.00
Total lnvestments and Average 1,710,000,00 1,710,000.00 1,780,769.90 1,710,000.00 6.060 359
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRr.sj Oate: 04/10/2002 - 09:48
I I
lnvestm6nts Par
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
o/t ot
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
380 Equlv,
YTM
365 Equlv.Value
Managed Pool Accounts
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
9,898,520.33
1,100,000.00
I,E96,520.33
1,1 04,125.00
9,898,520.33
1,100,000,00
90.00
10.00
1
1,826 '1,597
2,811
5.474
2.850
5.550
10,998,520.33 1'l,002,645.33 10,998,520.33 100.00%'t84 161 3.077 3.120
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending
Cunent Year
Average Dally Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are
Rahn A. Becker, Finance Dir./Treasurer
29,863.53 3't8,658,58
11,242,391.30
3.13%
available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is
& Agency funds, Capital Projects, and tunds).
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.O2fRun Date: 04/10/2002 . lO:35
Fiscal Year To Date
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details . lnvestments
March 31,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Page 2
Average
Balance Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Days to
365 Maturlty
YTM Maturity
Date360CUSIPlnveslment f lssuer
Managed Pool Accounts
81 08/09/2001 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.s3Local Agency lnv. Fd
Subtotal and Average
9,898,520.33 2.850 2.811 2.850
10,'t42,391.30 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.33
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
3133MGQR0 503 Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Average
o8l't5t2001 '1,',l00,000.00 1,104,125.O0 1,100,000.00 5.550 5.474 5.550 1,597 08/15/2006
1,100,000.00 5.q4 5.550 1,5971,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,104,125.00
Run Date: 04/1012002. 10:35
4'
Total lnvostments and Average 11,242,351,30 10,998,520.33 11,002,645.33 10,908,520,33 3.077 3.120 {6{
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SyrnRept V5.02f
'a
2.811 2.8s0 1
D
//urr.' ",Vfiy M"nuge,
d City Attomey
i.'1 pir. Finance
F/City planner
ISTRIBUTTON:
please iespond
tr No Response Required
March 23rd,2002
Burlingame City Council
Burlingame City Hall
Primrose and Bellevue
Burlingame, California 9,
il Dir. Public Works
li Hunran Resources
. Police Chief
Fire Chiel
r Parks & Rec
Liblarian
RECEIVED
MAR 2 s 20r,2
trsFHlfii,flEl'fiE
On Next Agenda
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF
YOUR RESPONSE TO THE
CITY CLERK
Re: Safeway, Walgreens and Wells Fargo
It is difficult to understand the arguments against the Safeway plans for
the new storebuilding for Safeway, Walgreens and Wells Fargo
Some have suggested the Burlingame Avenue is a feeling that must
be retained and is lacking in the latest plans... What do they mean?
The Pacific Bell Bldg. that has been closed since 1996 is better
or the Bank at the corner of Park and Burlingame still closed and
not bringing any increased business to the street. Or, maybe they
prefer all of the new national chain stores that have moved into the
area and taken over much of Burlingame Ave.
If this is true what is their complaint about the plans for Safeway.?
Wallgreens and Safeway have been, and will continue to be, the
two stores on the designated area... No change. Wells Fargo Bank
will return to the center. The delivery area will be offthe street ..
No change The Fox Lane widened to provide three travel lanes and a
dedicated loading area for Burlingame Merchants, and a sidewalk..
Thus, helping to eliminate some of the congestion on
Burlingame Ave. due to delivery to small stores on that street.
Right lane entry and departure on El camino opposite Ralston Ave.
Thus improving traffic flow into the parking area. Installation oftraffc
signal at Primrose and Howard..
Much more attractive parking area in front of walgreens, Safeway
and wells Fargo facing El camino. Elimination of the old wells Fargo
building and more attractive front with a variety oftrees and shrubbery
planted. Building facing Primrose will house small retail space to be
filled by new tenant.
This new plan will house wallgreens, wells Fargo Banrq Safeway and
additional small retail space facing Primrose.
Besides the fact that Safeway is a reasonably priced and well managed
grocery store and the need for so many to have a store of this caliber in
the immediate area should be a powerful reason for the City to approve
the existing plan as soon as possible... There are many elderly and young
people who depend on Safeway in this area. For
through.
sake put it
Honorable MaryJanney
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame 94010
Dear Madame Mayor,
I'm writing regarding Safeway's latest proposal to replace its present store,
Walgreen's and the empty Wells Fargo branch by building a superstore/distribution
center. The proposal I've seen, Burlingame Safeway Draft EIR 1201260, concerns me
because it's so badly out of scale with the surrounding area. It looks like an 800 lb.
gorilla that would be more at home next to a freeway. I'm unfamiliar both with
Safeway's rationale for this monster or with the Planning Commission's position, but
no matter how Safeway's architects try to fluffup the facade, they're asking the
people of Burlingsme to allow a sea-change in the style and ambiance of the
Burlingame Avenue shopping district.
Specifrcally, the proposal to have a blank wall out to Howard Ave. bothers
me, as do what amounts basically to another blank wall out to Primrose Rd., the
entrance from the small sea of parking inside this new commercial nucleus, and the
use of Fox Plaza Ln. to service the fleet of home delivery vehicles. Regardless of the
aesthetics, I don't think it would take long for the new site to become a cyst of
relentless truck traffic in a narrow lane with little --or no-- accomodation for
pedestrians. Moreover, the design discourages foot traffic between Burlingame
Avenue and this new shopping center.
The design ensures that it's got nothing to do with Burlinggms, but allowing
it in this configuration would negatively affect the downtown shopping district for
mzrny years. Please don't suppori it; the residents of Burlingame will applaud your
good sense today and your regard for Burlingame tomorrow.
g"L^ ,r'A $*"itt" 0^A"""*
rcz 9l,,aA^ll g.,a RECEIVED
g*rl;rrfrr*, Q^l;{^"^;* 9+040
MAR Z ? Z0r,Z
March 24th, zooz 8,,#8F'dl[i,fi8[,fiE
Sincerely,
71" &,/ar,,Cccucno?
John Anderson
Page 1 of 1
PWENG-Bagdon, George
To: COUNCIL-Baylock,Cathy;COUNGIL-O'MahonyRosalie
Cc: MGR-Nantell, Jim
Subject: FW: Broadway Streetscape - 1100 block temporary pedestrain
Dear Cathy and Rosalie,
I know both of you have received complaints about the Broadway Streetscape project recently. My staff has tried
to make the best of an unfortunate situation by working with the contractor to provide more access for the
businesses during the Easter weekend. Hopefully we can get the sidewalk paved early this week. My special
thanks goes out to our inspectors, Bill Lowrie and his brother Mikkelwho consistently place a priority on customer
service as discussed below:
----Original Message----
From: purilens appliance problems [mailto:smokie_the_cat@hoUnail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 30,2002 LT:MPM
To: blowrie@burlingame.org
Cc: sMurtuza@burlingame.org; PMonaghan@burlingame.org; MLowrie@burlingame.org;
GBagdon @burlingame.org
Subject: Broadway Streetscape - 1100 block temporary pedestrain acces
HIBiII-
Thank you for all your help on Fdday, March 29. I appreciated you taking the time to visit the nerchants with me,
to hand out the construclion update flyer. You also listened to the merctanb complaints and came up with a plan
of action. You called the Corporation Yard and got two follc to come help that afremoon. You also called your
brother, Mick and he dropped what he was doing to cone the help. Some temprary ramps with signs were
installed to each business and to proride through pedesbian access along the 1100 block. We added one hour
parking signs to eliminate long term parking that was occuning because the parking meters were removed witfi
the demolition. With the help of the Police Department this will be enforced for the next week. Your assertiveness
helped to get the contractor to take notice and come in on Saturday, March 30 to install some temporary asphalt
paving to the front door of each business. You were willing to come in on Saturday nroming to assist the
conhactor and his crew with the installation of the ramps. Your quick actions helped to placate the merchants in a
very diffi cult situation.
This work should have been done two weeks ago by the contactor and not the city, but you were able to take
quick action to get it done as soon as possible.
Thanks for your help.
Jane
https://webmail.burlingame.org/exchange/forms/ipm/note/frmroot.asp?command:new&store:0
PS - I drove W 1411 Chapin Avenue Saturday morning and the parking lot paving looked good and was already
in use by the merchants behind Maloufs.
3BU2AO2
CLK-Musso Ann
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
PWiENG-Erbacher, Frank
Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:33 PM
'BABAUTO@aol.com'
CLK-Musso, Ann; PW/ENG-Mortensen, Doris
RE: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting April 11,2002
Thank you! lwill forward your comments to the Commission. Frank E
---Original Message----
From: BABAUTO@aol-com [mailto:BABAUTO@aol.com]Sent: Tuesday, Apnl09,2002 2.14 PM
To: Ferbacher@burlingame.org
Subject: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting April 1 1 ,2002
I am writing to you in connection with the April 11 , 2002, meeting regarding
the possibility of eliminating several parking spaces on N. Carolan. Our
company, Broadway Auto Body located at 1305 N. Carolan Avenue, has worked and
coexisted with the dozen other businesses in this area for the last decade.
There have never been enough parking spaces to facilitate everyone's needs
but we have worked together to make the best of the situation.
Approximately six months ago
the tenant who has brought this request to the City began the operation of
his business in our area. lt appears that the logistics of his operation were
not properly taken into consideration before he picked this location. Since
he has moved in, our building (1305/1307/1309 N. Carolan) has already
relinquished 4 employee parking stalls in an attempt to ease the congestion
caused by the tenant's delivery trucks in the easement between the buildings.
This action came after the police were called out on more than one occasion
to attempt to resolve disputes between the tenants.
Many of the businesses in this area
are concerned that, by allowing the current proposal to be implemented, a
domino effect is slowly taking place and soon there will be even more limited
parking for the various businesses who have existed in this area for years.
This is leading to sever congestion of the street brought on by stray
customers and employees of different businesses attempting to locate parking
spaces. We therefore request that the current proposal to eliminate parking
spaces in lieu of a red zone arca on N. Carolan be rejected by the City ofBurlingame. Thank you for your consideration of this
information.
Sincerely
Broadway Auto Body
1
MEMORANDIJM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 9,2002
AWARD TO PHIL SCOTT
For your information, Phil Scott, the Public Works Superintendent, recently received the 2001
Pomeroy Award from the Califomia Water Environmental Association (CWEA). The
organization's mission is to enhance the education and effectiveness of California's wastewater
professionals through training, certification and promotion of sound policies. The non-profit
volunteer association was established in 1928 and sponsors seminars and hands-on training to
help wastewater professionals be more effective in their work.
Phil was recognized for his long-standing contributions toward expanding the knowledge and
professional development of wastewater collection systems personnel at an awards luncheon on
April5, 2002.
c: Phil Scott
S:\A Public Works Director$Stafi ReportsWemo - PScott Arurd.wpd
RE:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
APRIL 9,2002
RECENT 3OI AIRPORT BOULEVARD SITE ACTIVITIES
a
o
a
On March 25, 2002, a demolition permit was issued by the Building Division to R&B
Equipment, Inc. to perform demolition work at 301 Airport Boulevard. An encroachment permit
was also issued to the contractor which requires complying with the City NPDES regulations,
keeping the streets clean, following proper traffic control and repairing any damage to the street
pavement. At the time of the encroachment permit issuance, engineering staff indicated to the
contractor that any grading operation on site would require a separate grading permit from the
Building Division.
The following week after the encroachment permit was issued, the contractor was found to not
only be performing demolition but also conducting a substantial grading operation without a
permit. As a result, on April 4,2002, staff directed the contractor to stop grading operations and
take the following actions:
apply for a grading permit which requires City approval of a grading plan supported by a
geotechnical report
file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Board for stormwater discharges
resulting from construction activities on the site
obtain approval of a stormwater pollution prevention plan from the State Water
Resources Board
Although the contractor has stopped all grading operations and is now in the process of obtaining
the necessary approvals, staff is concerned about the environmental impact of the volume of fill
to be placed at the site. Preliminary information received from the contractor indicates that there
will be as much as five feet of fill placed above existing ground level. Staff will review this issue
carefully upon receipt of the grading application.
cc Jim Nantell,Larry Anderson, Meg Monroe
Syed Murtuza, Tom McGovern
R&B Equipment, [nc.
Dan Levin, Owner
State Water Resources Board
S:\A Public Works Director$Stafi Reports\Memo - Qading 301 Airport Bl.rpd
April9,2002
MayorMary Janney
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, Ca 94010
Dear Mayor Janney:
This is intended as a note of support to the City Council in the matter of selecting the new
members of the Planning Commission.
Specifically,we support the decision of the City Council to open to public the new positions for
tlie Planning Commission simply because it is the Council's right to use its discretion to appoint
people to the Commission who will reflect the general philosophy of the Council.This
philosophy has been good for the City of Burlingame, and it merits our approval, our
encouragement and our support. Attached, please find the editorial from The Independent, datod
March 18,2002. We fully agree with the editorial comments, and we fully support the Council
for their wise and timely decisions.
Our own past experiences with the Planning Commission have certainly been less than pleasant.
The Commission, led by Mr. Stan Vistica, de facto disregarded the formal findings of the
architectural review (a body created and administered by the city itself). Furthemore, it
disregarded the written and documented findings of other city officials, specifically those from
the Parks Department. It, in addition, disregarded the written findings of other certified experts,
and it ignored the unanimous letters of support from the local neighbors. In so doing, the
Commission cost our project a year in lost time, much aggravation, and it almost led to an
aggressive litigation against the City of Burlingame. This was not our vision of a wise
admini strative practice. .
We feel that there is a need for new faces on the Planning Commission. Hopefully, this will
bring parity to the process, even for those of us who have been Burlingame residents and
homeowners for more than three decades.
Drive
2405 Hillside Drive
Burlingame, 94010
PAGE 6A TI{E INDEPENDENT SERVIN(
\-.OPn
THEINuEPENDENT
FronrNcn FaNc
Editor
JouN T.C. FaNc
Publisher Emeritus
Jrnnv FucHs
Publisher
GnrcoRy WarxrNs
ManagingEditor
appointBes $houlil
$harc Gity Gouncil's uision
ber to
when
, intelligent job
issues. The Planning
HERE ARE rwo openings on the
Burlingame Planning Com-
mission. The Burlingame City
Council has the authority and the
right to appoint whatever planning
commissioners ,it wants. In every
for the council, but it does mean they
should share the same goals for
Burlingame's future.
Jerry Deal's decision . to appear
before the Planning Commission and
slam members of the City Council for
not reappointing Start Vistica and
Ann Keighran only confirms the fact
that the commission has become a
political entiry not an instrument of
government concerned with plan-
No city stands or falls on the service
of any one or two members serving
on any board or commission.
Burlingame has a strong planning
staff that provides
anee and direction
the kind of guid-
for any new mem-
on
. The Burlingame council would be
making a big rnistake if it appointed
planning commissioners just because
of pressure from a sector of the com-
rnlnitf. If the present planning com-
missioners are unhappy with the
council's decision, they can always
take their case to the voters in the
next city election.
But nobody has a RIGHT to a
PlSnning Cornmission seat. Every
planning commissioner serves at the
will of the council. That doesn't mean
Commission is not goiqg to fall apart
because two of its present commis-
sioners are not reappointed.
In fact, we believe the. Planning
Commission will be better seryed
with new members having new ideas
and bringing a fresh perspective to
EDITORIAL
?
the Peninsula that
commlssl0ners
1
I