Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.04.15BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Rncur,.qn MBBtrNc - MoNony, Arrul 15, 2W2 PAGE 1 or2 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO TIIE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Budget meeting of March 28,2OO2 and Regular meeting of April 1,2W2 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may timit speakcrc to three minutes each 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to stafffor investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limil speakers to three minutes each. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUIYICATIONS a. Presentation on League of California Grassroots Network b. Authorize Retention of Advocation, Inc. to Provide Lobbying Services Regarding AB 680 on Behalf of the City of Burlingame and other Peninsula Cities c. Appoint Planning Commissioners 8. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Purchase by Burlingame Fire Department of new fire engine from Pierce Manufacturing b. Request for Full-Time Parking Enforcement Officer (PEO) position for Police Department c. Resolution Regulating Parking at City Licensed Property at the corner of Marsten Road & Rollins Road and Authorizing the Towing of Non-Authorized Vehicles d. Warrants and Payroll, March,2O02 9. COI.]NCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ctty of Burlingame CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O (650) 558-7200 SUGGESTED ACTION 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Approval Presentation Approval Appoint Approval BTJRLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Rncur,an MrrtrNc - Momoay, Arrul 15, 2002 PlcB2 or2 a. Library Board of Trustees Minutes of February 19,2A02; Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission Minutes of March 14, 2002; Planning Commission of April 8,2002 b. Department Reports: Building, March, 2002; Finance, March, 2002 c. Letters from residents concerning Safeway expansion d. Email from Jane Gomery concerning Broadway Streetscape e. Email from Broadway Auto Body & reply from Frank Erbacher concerning parking at 1305 No. Carolan f. 2001 Pomeroy Award from the California Water Environment Association Award to Phil Scott g. Memorandum from Public Works Director concerning recent 301 Airport Boulevard Site Activities h. Letter from Dan Rados, 2315 Poppy Drive, supporting City Council's decision to hold interviews for the two Planning Commission positions 13. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy ofthe Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at rvww.burlingqnc.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NBXT MEETING - April 24,2002 City of Burlingame CITY HALL - 501 PRIMBOSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O (650) 558-7200 UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA March 28,2002 1. STUDY MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A budget study meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the Lane Community Room, Burlingame Library. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney. 2. ROLL CAI,L Council Present: Council Absent: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony None 3. 2002/03 Budeet Financial Plannine The following items were discussed by city staff regarding the 2002103 budget: a. Review plans to balance current and new years budgets b. Review impacts of budget planning on capital improvement program c. Review plans to fund water and sewer infrastructure upgrades 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Andy Wu, Paloma Avenue, and John Root, Burlingame Chamber of Commerce, thanked staff and council for the comprehensive budget presentation. 5. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m. Ann T. Musso City Clerk Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes 1 March 28,2002 UNAPPROVED MINUTES BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA April 1,2002 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Charnbers. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Vice Mayor Coffey. 2, PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Ross Bruce. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: Council Absent: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, O'Mahony Janney 4, MINUTES Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of March 18,2002; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Mayor Janney absent. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no public hearings. 6, PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Vandenbrink, L412 Alvarado, and Deborah Cody, 1416 Alvarado, both spoke regarding construction hours on weekends. CA Anderson reported that the Council met in closed session and instructed him on how to proceed on the following three items: a. Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(bX1), (3Xc)) Sally and Frank Chambers b. Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(b)(1), (3)(c)) Zeka Group c. One personnel matter (Government Code $ 54957) Burlingame City Council Unapploved Minutes 1 April 1,2002 a 7, STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Commissioner Term Expirations (Librarv Board) CM Nantell referred to staff report dated March 27 ,2002; noted there are two library commissioner positions that will expire on June 30,2002; explained three options on how to proceed filling the two positions. Councilman Galligan made a motion to use the current council policy as reflected in the 1994 Council Resolution 2l-94 and establish a filing deadline of Friday, May 3, 2002, for accepting library board trustee applications; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1, with Mayor Janney absent. Vice Mayor Coffey noted the interview committee would consist of Councilwoman O'Mahony and himself. CONSENT CALENDAR Apnrove 2007102 Annual Renort and Resolution of Intention: Broadwav Area 8 a c Business Improvement District - Setting 2002/03 Assessments ACM Becker requested council adopt Resolution of Intention and set public hearing. b. Resolution Authorizins Director of Public Works to Accept the Grant Deed for a Sanitary Sewer Easement at 1010 Cadillac Way DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #34-2002 authorizing the Director of Public Works to accept the grant deed for the sanitary sewer easement at 1010 Cadillac Way. Resolution Awarding Traffic Sisnal Proiect at California Drive/Carmelita & California Drive/Morrell Avenue to Mike Brown Electric Companv DPW Bagdon recommended council approve Resolution #33-2002 awarding the traffic signal project at Califomia Drive/Carmelita Avenue and California Drive/Morrell Avenue to Mike Brown Electric Company in the amount of $203,700. d. Resolution Awardins Cali Drive Resurfacing Proiect DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #32-2002 awarding the resurfacing project to Top Grade Construction, Inc. in the amount of $669,797. It is also recommended that staff be authorized to issue change orders up to 45o/o of the construction work. e.Weeds and Rubbish Abatement on Private Property DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #31-2002 setting a public hearing for May 20,2002, for the 2002 Weed and Rubbish Abatement Program on public and private property. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes2 April 1, 2002 f. Resolution to Support State Legislation Regarding Bav Area Resional Water Financing and Supply DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #38-2002 supporting Senate Bill 1870, the Bay Area Water Reliability Financing Authority Act and Resolution #39-2002, supporling Assembly Bill 2058, the Bay Area Regional Water Supply and Conservation Agency Act. g. Resolution Authorizins Submittal of Grant Request to Promgte Beverage Container Recycline ACM Becker recommended Council approve Resolution #37 -2002 approving the submittal of a funding request to the State Department of Conservation for a grant to promote beverage container recycling and litter cleanup, and authorizing the South Bayside Waste Management Authority to complete all necessary forms, implement program and provide information to the Deparlment of Conservation upon request; also, transfer 51,922.98 of prior year Burlingame beverage container grant funds to the SBWMA to be combined with this program. h. Resolution Authorizing Agreemept for Construction and Demolition Recvcling Administration Services with J.Edwards & Associates. Inc. ACM recommended council approve Resolution #36-2002 authorizing agreement for construction and demolition recycling administration services with J. Edwards & Associates, Inc. 9, COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City. 10. ol,p BUSINESS I1. NEW BUSINESS t2. ACKII_OWLEpGEMENTS a, Commission Minutes: Beautification of March7,2002; Parks & Recreation of March2l,2002; Planning of March 25,2002 b. Deparlment Reports: Police, February, 2002; Building, February,2002 c. Letter fi'om Ruthellen Rosenberger, 1109 Dufferin conceming parking problems d. Letters & Email from residents concerning Planning Commission appointments e. Letter from Stephen & Fiona Hamilton, 105 Crescent, concerning the selection process of Commissioners f. Email of March 18th from Zita Escobosa, 15 16 Adeline concerning fireworks at Ray Park Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes 3 April 1,2002 o Email of March 13th from Rosemary Rivas concerning list of historical buildings in Burlingarne 13. ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Coffey adjourned the meeting al7:26 p.m. in memory of Mrs. Kay Amstrup, beloved wife of former mayor Irving Amstrup. Ann T. Musso City Clerk Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes4 ApLil 1,2002 STAFF REPORT AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED AGENDA ITEM #7a MTG. DATE 4-1 5-02 TO:HONORABLE BY DArE: April 10,2002 FRoM: Jim Nantell City Manager 650-558-7205 BY suBJECT: Presentation on League of California Grassroots Network RECOMMENDATION: The City Council receive a report from Rebecca Elliot, Califomia League of Cities Regional representative, regarding community grassroots effort to involve communities in protecting local revenue and local control for local government. BACKGROUND: As a result of the state government-established trend to increase mandates on local government, reduce local control on core responsibilities such as land use, and take away local revenues, the League of California Cities has been working to set a new course that will increase the ability of a local government to influence and impact the decisions being made at the state level. For many of us, one of the biggest risks to the future of local govemment's ability to meet the needs of our community residents is the misguided actions that are undertaken at the state level. As you know, so many of those actions that impact us at the local level are often driven by a special interest that is able to influence the decisions through major financial contributions or political clout. For some time, many state legislators have been candid that the practical reality is that local govemment has little or no impact at the state level because of our inability to "make them pay''if they don't respond to the interest that we raise. Although it may seem harsh to some, it seems to be a practical reality. Given that reality last year the League of California Cities formed the grassroots coordinator and network for the purpose of working with city officials and regional divisions of the League to aggressively promote key League legislative priorities with legislators, district staff, local media, and other supporting community organizations. Rebbeca Elliot will be joining us for the City Council meeting to discuss her role as a regional coordinator for this most important undertaking. ATTACHMENTS: A. Grassroots Network Overview B. Grassroots Network Frequently Asked Questions C. The Proposed League Bylaws Changes that were approved last year by our City Council as well as the vast majority of League City memberships. C :\TEMP\League Grassroots Effort.doc L-- lr. N Oueruieu Pumose City officials have experienced deep frustration in recent years as the state government has amassed more resources and power at the expense of local govemment seMces.The League has a solid reputation as an advocate of city interests, but in the new era of term limits, traditional lobbying methods are often a poor match for grassroots campaigns and financial contributions by other competing interests. Many organizations have already responded to the new political reality in Sacra- mento by investing in a sfronger grassroots organ2ation, including the powefful education lobby, whidr recently launched a new, high profile and well-funded grassroots organization called EdVoice.The League now has to respond in kind to this new climate by building a solid grassroots network to coordinate city officials'efforts locally to influence legislators, heir staff, potentially helpful community groups, and the news media. Maior Elements The Network would consist of 1 0 field offices that would be staffed by 14 new and 3 existing staff (1 5 coordinators/2 support). The coordinators would work with city officials and he regionaldivisions of he League to promote key League legislative priorities with legislators, district staff, local media and other supporting community groups. They would arange meetings, plan news conferences, organize letter writing and media campaigns, and coordinate grassroots efforts with community groups with similar agendas. ln short, they would increase the impact of the League's 16 regional divisions and he already busy city officials in each division on the state legislature's and govemo/s decisions atfecting cities. Cost The Network would cost cities an additional $1.6 million each year in dues.This is tre equivalent of four one hundredths of one percent (0.04%) of the $3.8 billion cilies collect each year in sales and use taxes, and about one tenth of one percent of the $1.57 billion cities receive each year in VLF revenues. Most observers believe both revenue sources could become victims of legislative raids in the next recession. lndMdualcity costs forfte Network willvary depending on city population. For example, a city of 50,001 to 60,000 population would pay an additional $4,643. Such a dues increase will require amendment of the League bylaws approved by no less than 23 of the rcting League membership. Membership Review The idea of the Grassroots Network originated with he City Managers Departnent and was more fully developed by a specialTask Force appointed by the League board of directors. lnformation on he program was developed and disseminated to the full League leadership ( board, dMsions, departments, policy committees and caucuses), as well as to every city manager. Dozens of presentations on the proposalwere made to each League divlsion, many deparfinents, and to most of the area city manager groups throughout the state. Accountability to the Membership Based upon membership input, the Task Force recommended, and the board adopted, significant changes to the original proposal. These include: establishing longterm goals, annual program objec{ives, and regular reports to the membership; an unbiased, professional evaluation three times during the first five years;and a lote of the membership after five years to continue the program. Under the League's cunent bylaws, the board may also vote to discontinue the Grassroots Network at any time. Next Steps Cities are now asked to vote to approve the addltion of article XVI to the League's bylaws relating to the establishment of the Grassroots Network, along with a new increased dues schedule to pay for the progrcm. A ballot will be sent to eacfi city. Ballots retumed to the League must be postmarked no later than July 6, 2001. Revised 05/07/01 r .eaqur, ot {di[urnia iitrii Grassroots Nenvork Frequentb As ked Questiorus What is the Grassroots Coordinator Network? The Grassroots Coordinator Network would consist of 10 field otfices staffed by 14 new and 3 existing staff who would serve as grassroots coordinators. Their job would be to work with city officials and the regionaldivisions of the League to aggressively promote key League legislative priorities with legislators, district staff, local media and other supporting community groups. Why do we need a Grassroots Network? The Network proposal was developed by a task force (see page 4 tor a list of task force members) authorized by the League Board of Directors as part of its strategic planning process. lt responds to the deep frustration of many local officials about the cities'loss of political clout, compared with other, better-positioned interest groups that contribute millions of dollars to campaigns. The concept of establishing local field offices is used very successfully by political campaigns, as well as by teach- ers, labor and other statewide membership organizations. These groups find that a network of field offices is a well- tested means to communicate with a dispersed membership, and to mobilize local support for the organization's causes. A recent survey by researchers at Wake Forest University found that key congressional staff,hs well as government and public affairs executives, ranked grassroots activities as more effective in influencing the outcome of legislation than corporate or contract lobbying, campaign contributions or advocacy advertising. California's powerfuleducation lobby must agree: they recently launched a neq high profile and well-funded grassroots organization called EdVoice. These are the interests against which the League must compete in Sacramento. How will cities benefit from this proposal? The goal of the Grassroots Network is to focus on major issues of concern to all cities, such as fiscal reform, increased funding for transportation and local control. Cities will benefit from the increased visibility of city issues in local and statewide media, and by holding legislators accountable back home for the votes they cast in Sacramento. The potential payback for this investment is enormous. For example, on a statewide basis the proposed $1.6 million dues increase needed to pay for the network is equivalent to only four one hundredths of one percent (0.0a%) of the annual $3.4 miltion cities receive in sales and use taxes. lt is one tenth of one percent of the $i.57 bittion cities receive each year in VLF revenues. Portions ol both VLF and sales and use tax revenues are at risk from legislative raids if the state suffers another recession. The costs are also relatively smallwhen compared to the expenditures made by organizations that compete with cities and the League for the allocation of dollars in Sacramento. For example, the 1999-2000 legislative session just two of the statewide public employee unionsl that sponsored or lobbied for SB 402 (the binding arbitration bill) reported spending about $3.1 million in campaign contributions to legislators, candidates for statewide office or Page2ol 4 current stalewide of{ice holders, in addition to their expendhures lor in-house or contract lobbying. During the same period, the Calilomia Teachers Association, which competes very elfectively tor funding in Sacramento, reported spending approximatety $2.7 mitlion on lobbying expenses on education issues. ln the same period, the CTA also spent approximately $6.3 million on campaign contributions to legislators, candidates for statewide otlice and cunent statewide otfice holders, and $35.2 million on initiative campaigns to furlher advance their policy agenda. I I What would the g rassroots coordinatoni do? The coordinators role is to increase the impact of the League's 16 regional divisions, by helping busy city officials focus strategic attention on state legislators'and the governoFs decisions affecting cities. The coordinators will work to build relationships with local elected and appointed oflicials, local media, and other individuals and organizations in the region who might be called upon to be part ol a local coalition on a particular League initiative or pending legislation. The coordinators' would: Arrange meetings lor city officials with legislators, plan news conferences, organize letter writing and media campaigns, and coordinate grassroots efforts with community groups with similar agendas. Support mayors, council members and city managers in dratting sample letters trom cities; and train city stafl on understanding and accessing the legislative process. Provide regular presentations on legislative developments and insight into the political dynamics influencing legislative developments. Meet regularly with legislative staff, media representatives and community groups about the League's legislative priorities. What kind of person will be hired to staff the Network? Everyone associated with this project has concluded that the best way to make this Network eflective is to hire seasoned, prolessional, political organizers, not policy analysts or technical people right out of college. The budget provides an attractive salary and benefit package to do this. ln addition to reassigning some League staff, we, expect to recruii sawy political people who have worked on legislative or local elections, statled legislative offices, or worked in public affairs or campaign consulting firms. Where will the field offices be located? The 10 field offices would be localed around the state to ensure lhat coordinators are available to serve each o, the League's 16 geographic divisions, while still balancing the need to maintain close contact with legislative districts and to be accessible to all cities. A map of the distribution by region is available in the information pac*et developed by the League.The League will send out Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to solicit interest by cities in hosting a coordinator.The goal will be to achieve the highest impact on League lobbying and grealest visibility among mem- bers, while still keeping expenses as low as possible. Page 3 of 4 How does the Network relate to the ABC etfort? Action for Better Cities was crealed to make expenditures and engage in 'political' activities such as slatewide initiative campaigns. Recently, through in-kind contributions of staff time and strategic counsel, ABC was able to play a major role in helping to deleat Proposition 37, the initiative that would have severely limited cities' abilities to impose fees to support local regulatory activities and provide seMces. \A/hile both the proposed Network and ABC shari a similar objective, namely to gain more political clout for cities, the Network coordinators will focus on organizing local activities in support of League legislative positions. ABC will lead any initiative effort in support of fiscal stability and similar obiectives. Our city already pays a lobbyist. Why do we need this network too? The Network doesn't replace the ongoing need to have a strong lobbying presence in Sacramento. (ln fact, part o{ the task lorce recommendation which has been approved by the League Board of Directors is to set aside at least $50,000iyear in the budget to hire contract lobbyists in Sacramento to assist League statf at strategic times on some key issues.) Cities that cunently have their own contract or in-house lobbyist will probably continue to find that having their own representalion makes sense, for two reasons. First, the League's lobbying program represents the interests of all476 cities. lt lobbies the legislature on matters ol statewide importance to cities, and cannot provide the representation needed to address the individual needs of cilies or even a single region. Second, the grassroots coordinators will be networking and organizing people, not lobbyists. This work will support and enhance the etforts ol all city lobbyists, regardless of whether they are con- tractors or in-house statf. Several prominent mntracl lobbyists who represent individual cities have commented that they see the network proposal as complementary to their ability to represent their clients. What criteria will be used to measure the Network's effectiveness? The League board specified that, if the Network were approved by the membership, the board would set both long- term goals and annualized objectives for the program and report them to the membership. The board also required that the League engage the services of a consultant to conduct a proiessional membership survey that establishes a base line of information about city officials' perceptions o, the eflectiveness of the League's legislative advocacy efforts and the relative level of involvement of city otficials in support of that advocacy work. The board's intention is to repeat that survey at the end of year three and following year five, comparing changing attitudes and levels of efforts. How wil! the League be held accountable for the Network's success or failure? ln addition to the survey to assess members' perceptions and actual involvement in grassroots activities, the board also directed the stafl lo (1) establish a separate Grassroots Network account in the League budget, so that mem- bers can track Network expenses; (2) publish an annual legislative voting records report, including a ranking of legislators and the Governor on key city issues; (3) report board goals and annual legislative and policy objectives to the membership; (4) provide regular reports at the Executive Forum, Annual Conference and League deparlment and division meetings; and (5) provide periodic reports to the membership. Willthis new program have a sunset date? On or before the end of the sixth year of the program (December 31, 2007), the board will ask the membership to vote on the question of continuing the program. li the membership votes against the program continuation, the Network would be shut down, and cease operations by no later than the end of the seventh year (December 31 , 2008). Page 4 of 4 What will it cost? The estimated annualized cost is $1.6 million, spread among all member cities. This estimate is based upon the followin g assumplions: Several cunent League staff members will be reassigned. Approximately 14 new statl will be hired. Much of the cost for the individual otfices will be subsidized by the cities where the otfice is located, for ex- ample, by making office space and support slaff available within a city facility. How will costs be distributed? Costs would be distributed among all cities based upon the League's dues structure, which is based on population. Some small cities pay only a lew hundred dollars, while the largest cities pay tens ol thousands of dollars. The median dues statewide are cunently about $4,930. The Network would increase median dues by approximately $2,588., When would a dues increase start? ll the membership votes to approve the bylaw amendment the proposed dues increase would be effective on July 1, 2001. Grassroots Lobbying Task Force Haniet Miller, Mayor, Santa Baban - Chair John Thompson, City Manager, Vacaille, and President ol the CW Managers' Department - Vice Chair Eileen Ansari, Council Member, Diamond Bat Harry Armstrong, Council Member, Clovis Lee Ann Garcia, Council Member, Grand Temce Tom Haas, City Attomey, Walnut Creek Jim Marshall, City Manager, Merced Patsy Marshall, Council Member, Buena Pa* Dave Mora, City Manager, Salinas Kevin O'Rourke, Cig Manager, Faifield Susan Peppler, Council Member, Redlands Greg Pettis, Council Member, Cathedral City Mike Siminski, Council Member, Lompoc Armour Smith, Vice Mayor, Modesto Anne Solem, Council Member, MillValley Richard Teiank, Former Chief of Police, Buena Park Ruth Vreeland, Council Member, Montercy Endnote 1 The California Professional Firefighters Association and lhe Police Offcers Research Association of Califomia 2 For purposes of establishing the grassroots network, the $5,000 dues cap in League bylaws article lV section 2, is would be suspended for the years 2001 and 2002. The dues cap will apply to base dues without intenuption and will apply lo total dues in year 2003 and years following. Attachment A: Proposed Addition to League Bylaws Article XVI: Establishment and Financing of Grassroots Network Section 1: Enhancement of Advocacy Efforts. To enhance the League's advocacy efforts on behalf of cities, the League hereby establishes a Grassroots Network. The Grassroots Network consists of a series of field offices throughout Califomia, responsible for coordinating city advocacy efforts and promoting statewide League policy priorities. Section 2: Dues lncrease (a) lnitial Financing. The dues increase approved concunently with the addition of Article XVI shall finance the League's Grassroots Network for the second half of 2OO1 and for 2002. The increase shall be used exclusively to finance the Grassroots Network. (b) Continued Financing.., Any subsequent dues increases shall occur in accordance with Article lV. Section 3: Accountability (a) Annual Goal-Setting and Performance Assessment The League Board shall set long-term goals and annual objectives for the League's Grassroots Network. The League Board shall periodically report to the League's Member Cities on the Grassroots Netwok's performance in meeting those goals and objectives. (b) Board Discontinuance. lf at any time the League Board finds the Grassroots Network is not meeting its objectives on behalf of cities, the League Board may discontinue the Grassroots Network. (c) Membership Vote on Program Gontinuation. On or before December 31, 2007, the Board shall ask Member Cities to vote on whether to continue the Grassroots Network beyond December 3'1, 2OO8-2 1 Explanatory Noter'Article Nf is the existing section ofthe League's bylaws, which provide for 1) a tlvo-thirds vote of approval by the League board for all dues increases as well as 2) division ratification of dues increases in excess ofthe Consumer Price lndex. Article lV also caps individual city dues increases at $5,000 per year. 2 The League's bylaws provide that a majority of votes cast is necessary for decision on League votes See Article Xll, S 4. Attachment B: Proposed Dues to Establish the Grassroots Network For purposes of establishing the grassroots network, the $5,000 dues cap in League bylaws article lV, section 2, is suspended for the years 2001 and 2002. The dues cap will apply to base dues without intenuption and will apply to total dues in year 2003 and years following. The League board will consider in September whether a cost-of-living adjustment for dues will be needed in 2002. This table shows 2002 dues with a cost-of-living adjustment of 4%. Base Dues Paid in 2001For cities of: Base Dues for 2002 (Est) lA+ 4yo1 1 501 601 701 801 901 1,001 1,251 1,501 1,751 2,001 2,251 2,501 2,751 3,001 4,001 5,001 7,501 10,001 15,001 20,001 25,001 30,001 40,001 50,001 60,001 70,001 80,001 90,001 100,001 125,001 150,001 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 2,250 2,5s0 2,750 3,000 4,000 5,000 7,500 10,000 1s,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 200,000 500,000 640,000 000 $37 99 197 2',t6 259 317 494 611 727 865 921 1,020 1,078 1,176 1,3'r6 1,570 2,044 2,359 2,U8 3,279 4,'t05 4,930 6,068 7,382 8,504 9,346 9,817 10,&4 113U '13,075 14,392 '16,357 17,176 819 $39 103 205 225 269 330 514 635 756 900 958 1,061 1,122 1,223 1,369 1,633 2j25 2,453 2,%1 3,411 4,269 5,127 6,311 7,677 8,844 9,720 10,210 10,883 11,923 13,598 14,968 17,O11 17,863 8s2 ,o28 Total Dues lncluding Grassroots Network 2002 (Est) lc+Dl $59 157 312 u2 410 503 7U 969 1,152 1,373 1,461 1,618 1,710 1,865 2,088 2,490 3,241 3,741 4,516 5,201 6,511 7,818 9,624 11,708 13,87 14,823 15,570 16,597 18j82 20,737 22,826 25,942 27,241 1,299 66,125 1,201 393 200,001 500,001 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Plus Plus per each full 10,000 of population 41,6e3 I -'.i0,544:l +a,gor 7st l, ,ls9l 787 Over per each full 000 ot 51,950 over over oo1 13o '16! STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 112002 FRoM: Jim Nantelt City Manager 650-5s8-7205 AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 7b 4-l 5-02 SUBMITTED /1*"ffiLBY BY suBJECT: Authorize Retention of Advocationr lnc. to Provide Lobbying Services Regarding AB 680 on Behatf of the City of Burlingame and Other Peninsula Cities RECOMMENDATION: The City Council authorize the City Manager to retain Advocation, Inc. to provide lobbying services regarding AB 680 on behalf of the City of Burlingame and other Peninsula cities. BACKGROUND: AB 680 is controversial bill that would redistribute sales tax within the Sacramento region and would effectively serve as the beginning of the end of the distribution of sales tax back to local jurisdictions without any strings attached. The League of California Cities has been providing leadership to help focus our legislative efforts to defeat this legislation that could be disastrous to the City of Burlingame. San Mateo County cities have agreed that AB 680 is a dangerous precedent and requires an unusual proactive response from us. Therefore, the San Mateo County City Manager's Association has selected an experienced lobbyist--Advocation, Inc.--to work for a joint group of cities in the county to help defeat or amend this bill. Currently the cities of Daly City, San Carlos, San Mateo and hopefully Burlingame have agreed to share the expense of this lobbyist services. Although we expect other cities to join in, with four cities involved the monthly cost to each city would be $1,600 per city. DISCUSSION: As the Council knows, traditionally our second largest source of revenue to the City of Burlingame comes from the distribution of sales tax. At this point in the current fiscal year, with the projected loss of $6-7 million of anticipated hotel tax revenue, sales tax revenue is our single highest source of revenue, which this year was projected to be over $10 million. What is most distressing about AB 680 (and other similar bills) is that the state is attempting to take away local dollars and give some of it back with strings attached. That allows the Legislature to set the agenda and the priorities for local govemments. As you know, ten years ago, to help bridge a $14 billion state budget gap in1991-92, lawmakers created the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF), a measure dedicating a large portion of local property taxes to pay for public schools, thus relieving the state of the burden. That shift of local revenues resulted in a loss of $1 million annually to the City of Burlingame revenues. Simply stated, AB 680 takes the one cent for every sales tax dollar that currently goes to the local government where the sales was generated and redistributes one-third of the growth to cities on a per capita formula, one- third to cities to create open space and affordable housing, and one-third to cities based on the locale where the sales occurred. For the City Burlingame, which currently enjoys a relatively high amount of sales tax revenue per capita compared to other cities, the change that would give all cities in the county an equal per capita share of our sales tax growth, thus dramatically decreasing our sales tax revenue. In addition, the proposed change would direct a third to the City Burlingame, only if we agree to spend it on affordable housing and more open space. Although it would go to worthy causes, it would take away existing revenue that currently funds basic general fund services, including police, fire, public works, libraries, and parks and recreation without any means to replace it. In our case, our sales tax consultants have projected that this proposed change, should it be applied statewide in the future, would likely reduce the money for existing Burlingame services by $a to $5 million over ten years. In San Mateo County, the loss over the same period would be about $24 million. In today's dollars if this were to occur, the state would have taken away about 2% ($500,000 of $30 million) of the City's general fund revenues while at the same time continuing to increase demands on cities to cover mandated services. This loss is the equivalent to the annual cost of four police officers or firefighters. SUMMARY OF KEY CONCERNS ABOUT AB 680 AB 680's reallocation of sales tax revenues for the Sacramento region sets a dangerous precedent for all cities. For the first time, sales tax distribution will be taken over by the state, undermining local control of sales tax dollars. AB 680 puts fire, police and other essential services needs at risk. It jeopardrzes the ability of cities to fund service needs of a rapidly expanding population. City officials deeply distrust the state's motives for reforming the local share of sales tax. The state could achieve the same policy goals by redistributing its own share of sales tax. Local governments cannot single-handedly solve the state's pressing need for affordable housing. The state is quick to cut funding that would create incentives to build more housing, whenever state revenues are declining. We need to stabilize local revenues before finding alternatives to fund housing and other needs. The state created the situation that forces cities to try to maximize sales taxes and other revenues. The state should sponsor a constitutional amendment that will stabilize local revenues. Constitutional protection for local revenues would give cities a stable predictable revenue source, which would allow them to engage in thoughtful, long-term planning. The state has already taken the property taxes and threatened the Vehicle License Fee revenues. Now they want to take the sales taxes as well. Cities cannot afford to lose any more revenue and continue to provide essential services to their residents. ATTACHMENTS: Fair Political Practices Commission Form 602 o a a a Lobbying Firm Activity Authorization FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM. CALIFORNIA FORM Filing Requirements: A Form 602 (Lobbying Finn Activity Authorization) must be completed and verified by each person who employs or contracts with a lobbying firm. The Form 602 must be attached to the lobbying firm's Form 601 (Registration Statement) or, when adding a new client or employer to the firm's existing registration, to Form 605 (Amendment to Registration). The person who employs the lobbying firm must date and sign the verification. In the case of a business entity or organization, the verification must be signed by a responsible officer of the entity or organization or by an attorney or a certified public accountant who acts as an agent for the entity or organization. Lobbying Firms that Subcontract a Client: A lobbying firm that subcontracts to provide lobbying services to clients of another lobbying firm must identify the subcontracting lobbying firm and the client(s) on whose behalf it will lobby. A Forrn 602 signed by a representative of the subcontracting lobbying firm must be included with the contracted firm's registration. The subcontracted client is not required to file a Form 602. In addition, it is not necessary to complete the Nature and Interests section for subcontract clients. Additional Information Refer to the Lobbying Disclosure lnformation Manual for additional information and information required to be provided to you pursuant to the Infonnation Practices Act of 1977. FppC Form 602 (7/98) For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660 602 Lobbying Firm Activity Authorization (Govemnrent Code Section 86104) Check one box, if applicable [] Lobbyist Employer (Gov. Code Section 82039.5) fl Lobbying Coalition (FPPC Regulation t8616.4) Type or Print in Ink NAME OF FILER: City of Burlingame BUSINESS ADDRESS: (Number and Street) 501 Primrose Road than above.) (Srate)(Zip Code)r 650 NUMBER: 558-7204 Burli ame cA 94010 Advocation, lnc. NUMBER: (Optional) 1 650-. ) 342-8386 I hereby authorize Legislative Session (Insert Years) Page- of - For Official Use Only FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM. (Name of Lobbying Firm) 1121 L Street. Suite 610, Sac ramento, CA 9581 4 (Business Address) to engage in the activities of a lobbying firm (as defined in California Government Code Section 82038.5 and 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 1S238.5) on behalf of the above named employer. If you are authorizing another lobbying firm to lobby on behalf of your firm's client(s), provide the name(s) of the client(s) below. (It is not necessary to complete the Nature and Interests section.) NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLIENT:NAME OF SUBCONTI{ACTED CLIENT: NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLIENT:NAME OF SUBCONTRACTED CLTENT: VERIFICATION I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this Statement. I have reviewed this Statement and to the best of my knowledge the information contained herein is true and complete. I certify under penalty ofperjury under the laws ofthe State ofCatifornia that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICER James Nantel City Mana qerName of Responsible Offrcer PRINTOR TYPE By Title FPPC Form 602 (7/98) For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660 602CALIFORNIA FORM Lobbying Firm Activity Authorization SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE of Burlin me Nature and Interests of Lobbyist Employer Check aze box only: [ ruotvtouAl (complete I nusrNess ENTrry n - only Parts A and E) - (Complete only Parts B - and E) Type or Print in Ink TNDUSTRY, TRADE OR PROFESSIONAL ASSN. (Complete only Parts C and E) I Oruenle.g.,lobbying coalition) (Complete only Parts D and E) Page - of - 602CALIFORN!A FORM A.Individual l. Name and address olemployer (or principal place of business if self-employed): Description of business activity in which you or your employer are engaged: Description of business activity in which engaged: C. Industry,'li'ade or Prot-essional 2. Specific description ofany profession which the assoc, portion or faction ofthe industry trade, or iation exlusively or primarily represents:l. Description of industry trade or profession represented: 3 . Number of mernbers in association (check appropriate box) n ,O OR LESS (provide names of all nrembers on an atrachment.)! r'ronr rHAN 50 D.0ther l. Statement ofnature and purposes: City of 29,000 on San Francisco peninsulain San MateolCounty 2. Description of any trade, profession, or other group with a common economic interest which is principally represented or from which rnembership or financial supporr is principally derived: E. Industry Group Classification Check one box which most accurately describes the industry group which you represent. See instructions on reverse. I lcntcvuuno | rcc,lt BUsl /Ess (checkoneof thefollowingsub-categories.) I eoucertoN I ruaucturtoyEEs EeNIenIaINMENT/RECREATIoN I orr.ANDGAs tr covERNMENT A pourrcAL oRGANrzArroNS ! :T*E/INSURANCE ! rnorassloNAlirRADE ll r-oocrNcnesTAr.JRANTS I nralesrnre I nunn I wrurues flruam-recruRrNc/rNDusrRrAl [ ,**..oRTArroN fl oruen, (Specific Description) FPPC Form 602 (7/98) For Technical Assistance: 9i6/322-5660 I utoonuNroNs I oraon. (Describe in detail) ! rwancHeNDrsvRETArL FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMM. Instructions for Nature and Interests of Lobbyist Employer FAIR POLITICAL PRACT'CES COMM CALIFORNIA FORM Nature and Interests of Lobbyist Employer: Check the box that indicates whetheryou are an individual, a business entity. an industry, trade or professional association, or some other type of entity, such as a lobbying coalition, a religious organization, a political or public interest organization, or a recreational club. Complete Part A, B, C, or D, whichever is applicable, and then complete Part E. Industry Group Classification All filers must complete Section E. Check one box that most accurately describes the industry group you represent. Industry, trade, or professional associations should check the box that most accurately describes the industry group of its mernbers (e.g., an association of hospitals would be classified as "Health," and an association of mortgage banking entities would be classifred as "Business-Finance/Insurance"). Following are some additional examples: Agricalture: Includes growers, ranches, vineyards, flower growers, fertilizer manufacfurers, etc. Educatiott: Includes educators, private and public schools, and education unions. Governmenl: Includes cities, counties, and all other publicly- funded agencies. Heahlt: Includes physicians, dentists, optometrists, chiroprac- tors, nurses, etc., as well as ambulance companies, convalescent homes, pharmacists, pharmaceutical manufacturers, therapists, hospitals, etc. Labor Unions.' Does not include public employee and education unions. Legal: Includes attorneys and attorney associations, except those representing public employee attomeys. Political Organizations: Includes political committees and clubs. Puhlic Employees: Includes all public employee associations, organizations, and unions (except education unions), including district attomeys, public defenders, firefighters, judges, police, sheriffs, etc. Utilities: Includes telephone, power, and water companies. Other: Describe. (After reviewing your description, the Secretary of State may place you in one of the classifications described above or assign you to the miscellaneous category in the Directory of Lobbyists, Lobbying Firms and Lobbyist Employers.) The category "Business" has been divided into several sub- categories, including: Entertainment/Recreation: Includes baseball, football teams and country clubs, casinos, horse breeders, race tracks, music companies, and theaters. Does not include hobby or recreational clubs which are not business-related. Finance/Insurance: Includes health insurance companies, collection agencies, credit services, mortgage bankers, title companies, etc. Lodging/Restaurants: Includes bars, hotels, night clubs, resorts, etc. Ma nu facturin g/Industrial: Includes beverage manufacturers, canneries, cement companies, chemical laboratories, timber companies, wineries, etc. Merchandise/Retail: Includes beverage distributors, coin dealers, florists, home fumishing stores, pharmacies, etc. Oil and Gas: Includes drilling contractors, exploration companies, gas and oil companies, etc. Professional/Trade: Includes individuals or business entities, or organizations representing accountants, architects, auction- eers, bail agents, building trades, construction interests, court reporters, engineers, photographers, travel agents, stock brokers, plumbers, veterinarians, etc. NOTE: A trade association representing ranchers would be classified as "Agriculfure," not as "Professional/Trade." Real Estate: Includes developers, rental companies, real estate companies, property management, etc. Transportation: Includes airlines, moving and storage, railroads. shipping, trucking. etc. Other: Describe your business interest if it does not fall into any of the other business categories (e.g. apartment owners, funeral homes, mobile home parks, publishers, refi.rse companies, retirement homes, waste managenlent, etc.). NOTE: This subsection is different from the "OtheC' category identified in the Industry Group Classification which is for use by filers whose activities are not business-related. FPPC Form 602 (7/98) For Technical Assistance: 916/322-5660 a a a a a a a a a a 602 AGENDA ITEM #7c STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City CouncilTO: DATE: April 3,2002 FROM MTG. DATE 4-1 5-02 SUBMITTED U,-^---BY BYExecutive Assistant G ity Manager's Office (650-558-7204) SUBJECT: GOMMISSIONERAPPOINTMENT (Planning Gommission) The citizens listed below have interviewed for two seats on the Planning Commission: Planning GommiSSiOn (2 positions: expired term to 4-7-06; lnterview team: Baylock / Galligan) Ken Carroll Patricia Gray Russell Jackson Ann Keighranl Christopher McCleary Stan Vistical Council maywishtomakethenecessaryappointments, or provide other direction to staff. V [DlMy Documents\Commission\COMnl1f enU] Attachments (Council only) # IncumbenUnumber of terms served FOR CITY USE ONLY City of Burlingame Commissioner Application Form Please prtnt or type. $ arrtiogo*e registered voter /Copto to: CC, cu, C-F MAR 2 7 2007 Name:Cur^" Address: /6O?lLu^o.*-/o U/4 f Phone: SefSSO o *)lt 6a7^/52)f*^*4 ! email @ptionat)l How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)? f 0 Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? Yes I No tr Education:Degree(s/IvIajor(s): Occupation /ty: Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select E Beautification Commission tr Civil Service Commission tr Library Board E Parks & Recreation Commission SrUroing Commission tr Traffic Safety Parking Commission Mosquito Abatement District Signature: Please return your application and supplemental questionnaire to: City Manager's Office City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 one); Date [U:\My Dwumts\Comissions\Comissim Application 200l.wpd] Revised October 4, 2O0l , !ln*l,;' , K*Ju/,"n* (C "**J") City of Burlingame Planning Commission S upplemen tal Qu estionn aire Applicant Name: To assist in the process, please aff;wer the following questions and submit written responses with your application form. Responses should be printed or lwled. You may use additional sheets of paper. Thank you. 1. Please comment on how youfeel thatyour education, training, uperience and community involvement, will be a benetit to Planning Commission and community? A > o- pl',,*-V^, Hv,+c T<-k *'-l K.**"i.W,rtC*fQ , &: 2 ,5'1-n-s X H ?rq:J.:: +:1,?. * #rk" ffi' **d:l :,',;*qiir Ve-7t^> ql^J f t-Ues' )' 2. Please list the communiE activities or organizations you have participated in and indicate your level of involveruent (member, attended event, ran a booth, worked on the organizing committee, was qn officer, etc,). Indicate the amount of time each month you spend on each of these activities. QrueJ-,^ uf 4?9o R.€.n<e 1-[*l-k 6 /es1e^5 /o\-, / vn^ we<. Q"k, .frr,'., 5q* so^)'6$L".{ ' f* ,-,u--k*-'{.o --J" ",6 Seqs"''^ J. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big cornmitment Besides the 25 annual regular meetings, the comruissioners all participate on subcommittees. The standing subcommttteelor Netghborhood Consistency meets at least 4 tirnes a year; other single toptc subcommittees will meet once or twice a monthfor periods of two to six ruonths" For conventence of all the commissioners son e of these meetings are held during the business day (generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do youfeel that you have the time to make sach a commitment? V l<5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire c) ApplicantName: Page 2 4, What do you think are the three most signiftcant planning issues facing the City and why? D 4 5. Please describe briefly the neighborhood where you live. o- Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood. N"lg lr^- 4 tonq-rg *, t [^,. f [.*,'- Co,rgf -.,. f ,o.,, keJs , ? (^,^ R .. R*, "" {.,* Lr,-* ^ts oJ 7-y*-f> -'* ( 4lo,rs,,J.-o{.'o- /o g'*'^{ <-t fr ze^s o"*! 9'{u-= hourr-.7 / Ar"rn =s ,.ge-,[g ) w"*V u";:f..,-1."*l/ *;[{" -*A.- t'Jf D'p'^*"^= ''{, o^{ " Cor.r'r r.zrcSgt< D e""J ,-,rs{ur.< *t"**-J. -,j ffi',-, /r., 2) y'^-r," "+y f.g-l-.,,lsr fo-kt, S 4o7, s o € ,a-)e-s / t,>lg yo.^> q,nJ 9e-,"to 19 . - Po,-,. I (es ^^.($ut"]e b. If you could, what two things about your neighborhood would you change? , r4-7io 5f^--{5 A 5b- Jr*'^ f '"f(L 6. How do youfeel about the city's recent action to require design reviewfor changes to the businessfacades in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas? T d-o ^.1 Lr. e4^ uft,^;,^ o1 /4,, y' o-tJ .q City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire K.Qr^-[[Applicant Name:(./\ Page 3 7. lVhat groups within the community have you been a part of (please check all that app$: K homeowner--R- rentedproperty (residential) X o*rf* businesiin Burlingame A. have chtldren in school belong toa communttyT--Other & Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like to sharewith the City Council Below, please indicate which meeting you will attend I plan on attending thefollowing corumission meeting(s)*: *Pleose let staff know you are in afrendance at the meeting and ogrpltcant's sign-up sheet at the meeting you attend remember to stgn the Please retum your application and supplemental questionnaire to: CityManager's Office Cityof Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 All applications and supplemental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager,s Office no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, March 29,2002. ( /1-,'L 7S 6eP *tf"^-!.J s-[.o, Is *,4 o-[r.t =t*ho q./{. d@)Buulr5.r.^<5.*lo,{e, regarding planningfor the City of Burlingame? ;T Lous_ fir*J 8", l,x;aar.r €lr^ p-h'r- ^"+.J L.,^-J ('1. interview. The Planning Commission meets the and 4 Monday of each month. Commissioner Application Form Name: CITY OF BURLINGAME Commissioner Application Form Hease pint ar type- Page 1 of5 t Address: t J-l ,* Phonez (ilay)(evening) 5C)4 long have you lived in Bur{ingame (years)? r t Are you registercd to vote in I V f Email (optional) t/l o#.,^+ Yes Noo Bnrlingame registered voter Copictto: CC,CNI, (tr Education:Degree(s)flVlaio(s):Lt tt5r{42 Jqn F".^n qrsca 5**{".J s.F A.-t T^#tt=t t 0ccupation / Spccialty: B A.t';. ",,{r "Arur!+F*t '/'€-r+"t Please accept this as my epplication for a position on the (selecl only one): n Beautification Commission a Civil Service Commission n Library Board o Parks & Recreation Commission KO,"Commission u Traffrc Safety Parking Commission Signature:Date: n http /lwww. burl mgame. org/counct l/commsstoner_appltcahon_torm. htrn u3{28/20$'.2 MAR 2 8 2002 Commissioner Application Form Page 2 of5 Pteasc rrcturn your epplication ardsupplementel questionnaine to: Vi lVeber, Executive Assistent City Manager's OIIice 501 Primrose Roed cA 94010 Reviged 3/62002 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire Po*rr.4 GroTApplicants Name:T To assist in the selection prooess, please answer the following questions and srbmit written responsos with your application form. Responses shanld be printed or twted. You may use additional sheets of paper. Thank you. 1. Pleax comnenl oa howyoufelthotyourdttcuio4 tairtng, eqaience andcomrunity iawlvemetqwdll be a benfr to Planning Comn*xdr,n atd comnunity? 5ee o+{=- -L Q-J P^ P er5 Z Ple$c lisl lhc comnuaity adivttia or orgaaizdiotts you havc puticipuet in and infrcac your loel of inwlvement (member, oltenfud aenl, ran a buth, worked on the orgaaizing comilitttee, was ail offtcer, etc). htdicdethc anpunl of litw each northym spendon eoch of thae rctfudtirs" 3. Thc posfion of Hanrtng Conmissioae is a big commitnent Besidzs the 25 anrual rqulu medings, the commissioners all poaicipate on subcommiltex The standing subcommifretfor Neighborhd C;onststency me6 sl lcos, 1 tina a yau; aho single apic sabcornmitle* will ned once u twice a nodhfor paiods of ttw to six ruonths. For convenicnce of all the commissionets some of thw nudings ate held furtng the busillless itq (gen*alb a the beginrtng or end of the day). Do youfezl tlut you hwe the tinu to mahe such a commiunent? http://www. burl mgame. orpcouncr Ucommrcsloner_apphcatron_torm. hm u3/2U/2002 1 2 I have training in the visual arts, and have an interest in city planning. As a long time resident of the city, I have experienced the changes in our city for decades. I am aware ofthe changes in our population and the changing needs ofour citizens. I am currently an elected member of the San Mateo County Council of the Green Party. I am member and past President of Peace Action of San Mateo County. I have worked as an organizer for the California Oaks Project (a Ralph Nader organization) and for the single payer health plan initiative. I have served as a volunteer at Lincoln School in Burlingame, and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Unitarian Church of San Mateo. I spend five hours a week on these activities. I am a retired teacher and have time and energy to devote to my crty. I think that we have a housing problem in our city. The cost of housing is so high that people who work here can not afford to live here. Workers have to commute for long distances. This is a concern for our qualrty of life and the environment. Our infrastructure is aging and need of repair and maintenance. We need to get our over head wires put under ground. We have transportation and parking issues that need to be addressed. I live in the Easton section ofthe city. I live two short blocks west of El Camino Real in an area of single family homes. a. I like the well-maintained homes in the area and the street trees. b. I would like it if there were not so many cars going up and down my street, and if fewer cars were parked at the curbs. I wish that the empty lot at the corner of Adeline and El Camino Real were made into a community garden for the people who live in the 3 4 5 7 apartment buildings of our city. We should search out other spaces that could be made into communrty gardens. 6. I support the plan for design review for business facades in the Burlingame Ave. and Broadway areas. I think that some review is necessary so that the older and the new or remodeled facades respect each other. We have many beautiful buildings of the 1930's that set the tone of our city. I think that the new should compliment these older buildings. I am a homeowner. I work in the city. I have children in the schools. I am a member of a religious community. I am a community activist. I think we should make our communrty more bike friendly. Nearly all our children are driven to school. It would be better for them to ride their bikes. In a community that plans for the use of bikes, people of all ages can use this means of transportation to get around safely. The Bart station in Miltbrae is going to have an effect on our city. We must plan for the changes that are going to take place. I think that our city should be involved in the AirPort Noise Abatement Program so that we could take part in having our homes retrofitted and insulated against the noise. I think that the city of Burlingame should be more responsible for our water supply. We have no voice on the Public Utilities Commission of San Francisco which supplies our water. I 9. t plan to attend the planning commission meeting on April 8,2002. FOR CITY USE ONLY City of Burlingame Commissioner Application Form Please print or type.to: MAR 2 I 2002 D Name: RUSSell tr. Jqckson Address:Walnut Phone:,&1'0-(aoil I(o5O-)b11 4 Email @pnonat)t,1ay1b nSlr € qol .COvn How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)? h V e*fS Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? yes,X No tr Education: UCDailb CSf\ Degree(s)/Ivlajor(s): BS ?io rcaL Sciez-ces Occupation / Specialty: 6UerA1 LAV,f(,aclD{ Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one): EI Beautification Commission tr Civil Service Commission tr Library Board tr Parks & Recreation Commission Eftu*ring Commission tl Traffic S afety Parking Commission Abatement District Date: 3 )q oa Please refurn app and supplemental questionnaire to : City Manager's Office City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 [D;\l\4y Deumnts\Comision\Comission Appliotion 200l.wpd] Revised Ocober 4, 20Ol CC, CM, Applicant N ame: City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemen tal Questionnaire AusgL,h&son To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questiorn and submit written responses with your application form. Responses should be typed.Y ormay use additional sheets ofpaper. Thank you. 1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, uperience and community involvement, will be a beneftt to Planning Commission and communiqt? 2, Please ltst the communiqt activities or organizations you have participated in and indicate your level of involvement (member, attended event, ran a booth, worked on the organizing committee, was an ofricer, etc.). Indicate the amount of time each month you spend on each of these activities. i. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Besides the 25 annual regular meetings, the commissioners all parttcipate on subcommittees. The standing subcommittee for Neighborhood Consistenqt meets at least 4 times a year; other single topic subcommittees will meet once or twice a monthfor two to six months. For convenience of all the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the business day (generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do yoafeel that you have the time to make such a commitment? City of Burlingame Phnning Commission Supplemental Question nrirc Applicant Neme; Russell Jackson Page I 1.Pleosc comnunt on how youfeel that ltour educdon, trainlng, qerlcnee and communlty involvement, wlll be a benetlt to Planning Commisslon and community? I have been a Burlingare resident and boreowrer sirce 1981, ad was raised in Ivlillbrae, and have thercfore witnessed many chmges in our cornmnrnity over the years. I have four children u&o have been, ad curre,rilly are, active in local )rcuth sporis and scbool activities. I am a general contractor speciafiang in residential remodeling, with rcst of my businss$ hcated here in tk mid-Peninzula and have been witness to the plamiog proccss both as part ofmy business and as a horneowner. Plcase lN the corumunity activtti* or organizfrions you ha,e panicipatcd in and indicate yow level otinwlvenent (nwnber, ottended event ran a booth, worked on the oryanizing commifree, was ut offtce4 dc.). Irdicste the anaunt af finu eoch month you ryend on each of thue adtvitiq. Past activities inctude AYSO (former coach ad referee); BYBA (former coach); the former Burlingame-Hillsborough Little League (coach and organizer of the last r@or opening day ceremonies at Washington Park in 1991). I am current$ a rcmber ofthe Padsh Council ad Men's Club at St. Cath€rine of Siena Church and spend approximately 15 hours per rnonth on their activities. 3.The psttion af Planntng Conmisstoner k a btg corwrrirrrunt B*tdcs the 25 ununl rcgulu medings, the conniwions all panicipae on subcommitte* The slonding subcommitteefor Neighborhood Corcistency nu6 a, least I tims a yeo$ other single loplc sufuomnittex will weA once ot twice a monthfor two to six manths. For conveniene af oll the annissionq* sorne of these ,rKAW orc hcld during the businw doy (generolly at the begirrning or end otthe day). Iro youfeel that you ha,e the tinu ta nuke such a commifiwfi? Because I am self eryloyed I have the luxury of sefiing my own scMule. The only conflict that might arise from tinp to time would be the rnonthly Parish Council rneetings at St. Catherine's. 1.WhN doputhink arc the three most stgttlfrcunt planning issuesfacing the CW orrd whyT a-Shopping and business areas (e.g. Burlingame Avenue and adjacent downtowrq Broadwan aud California Drive); I believe that the Plarming Commission needs to carefully consider the size and types ofbusinesses in these areas with a goal to preservs the special flavor of our town S/hile I do not think the Plarudqg Commissbn strould limit the specific businesses that corre into Burlingare, I think we should nrake sure that the size of the busirrcsses are not out ofproportion, or too large, for our business districts. 2. City of Burlingame Plenning Commission Supplementrl Questionnairc Applicant Neme: Russell Jackson Page 2 ,. b.Rollins Road Idustrial Area and C.omrrercial Areas east of Hwy l0l (Old Bayshore Hury and Airport Blvd.): The tlpes of businesses in these commercial areas have changed over the yearsi as has the business clirnate in th Peninsula area We ned to determine ttre types of businesses that we want to attract to Burlingame, their potential reventre to Btrlingarne, the types of services required by these busirrcsses, and their impact on the zurrouding aruas, strchas tratrc control ad drainage. c. BART: The l!fillbrae BART Station will be operational soon ard will gfeatly iryact all of Burlingure, but particularly the northern part of our town: all ofRollins Road, Broadway, Californb Drive, Trousdale fhive, and all fi,eeway access tolfrom both 280 and l0l. We d to be sure that our reighborhoods are rot impact d negatively by BART, and that they continue to rernain as intact neighborhood conuntrnities. Pleax deribe bdqly the ruighfurtod where you llve. I live on ttre north block of Walnut Avenre: one block west of El Camino, between Forestview ad Mllow Avenues. It is a street tbat has unique homes that were buih anywhere from the early 1900's to hte 1970's. & Idcntify two thtngs you llhe ,rroil ofuuyour neighborhood I like tb individuality ofthe homes in my neighborhood. In addition, u/h€n my wife ard I first bought otr home tlrene were several elderly neigtrbors who were ttre original ow-ners oftheir homes, with few children- Our neighborhood has ctranged with frsrilies ofyoung children having recently moved into ttr neighborhood, bringing their energy ad enthusiasm. Thanl&lly, the older reside,nts in our neighborbod seem to eqioy tlneir yormger, rew rrcighbors. h rf you coul4 whd tt+to things abou yow neighbortod woald you change? I would change tlp narrovmess ofWakrut Avenrrc, as the fre department hs difficutty driving down our street if cus are parked on both sides. In addition, as oldff homes are gised ad replaced with new hmes, I wouH change tk size aod design ofthe newer homes so that they rnore closety conformed with the rest ofthe neighborhood. Eow fu yoafel abw the cily's rcccnt adim b reqdre datgn roieufor chatgx lo the budnasfacada in the BwltttgutuAvenae and Broaduuy arcu? I am in frvor ofthe city's action to require design revbw, as I think ooe ofthe planning Cormrission's duties is to help preserve the unique nature of our Burlingame Avenue and Broadwayarsas. 6 City of Burllngeme Planning Coumission Suppbmentrl Questionnaire Applicent Nrme: Ru$ell Jackson page 3 7.Wwl gronp wilhh the wmuadty have twu been aNfi of @letx chech all tha @y): )m{ hottuownet )O{$, rcntedproperty (ruidcntial)(in 1980-1981) )W{ work in Badinganc (various building proje.cts) W own abusinzssin Bwliagane )ffi( hove chlldnn in school )W{ belong toa rcllgiors conmaniy W(. AYSO, BYBA, Bulingane Gblssoftball Are there any dher ideas or rybiarc yu tould llhe a shue with the Ctly Council rcguding planniag lor the City of Bwlinganc? I believe that we should bave strict regulations and enforcement ofproperty maintenance ad building upkeep throughout Burlingare, in addition to design review, in order to insure safety ofour residents and preserrratbn ofthe special anrbiarrce ofour neighborhoods and business districts. 8. {: } D f>"rt- l-a>- FOR CITY USE ONLY City of Burlingame Commissioner Application Form Please print or type. Name $ a rrti rgo*e re gis tere-d g t er/ Copiesto: CC,CU, Ot' Address: |531 frnfrY,Vfl ,r Av<- . MAR 2 I 2002 Phone:o-(evening Email @ptionat)l nC How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)?\ Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? yes H No tl tion:D e gree(s )/I\[aj or( s) : / Specialty: Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one): tr Beautification Commission tr Civil Service Commission tr Library Board fl Parks & Recreation Commission d Ptanning Commission D Traffic Safety Parking Commission n Ir4osquito Abatement District Signature, &*,{)Date: 3 c Please refurn your and supplemental questionnaire to : City Manager's Office Cify of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 D [U:\My Documents\Conmissions\Comission Application 200l.wpd] Revised October 4, 2001 City of Burlingame Planning Commission S up lemen tal Qu estionnaire To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with your application form. Responses should be uintted orlNpeg!. You may use additional sheets ofpaper. Thank you. 1. Please comment on how you feel that your edacation, training, experience and' community involvement, will be a benelit to Planning Commission and community? \\Sas-,c+fq0ho,& sho-ols tt 2. Please list the communtty activities or organizations you have participated tn and indicate your level of involvement (member, attended event, ran A booth, worked on the organizing committee, was,an ofJicer, etc.). Indicate the amount of time each month you spend on each of these activities. tt Vu ailccJlocL s'h€4j6 3. The position of Planning Commtssioner is a big commitmenl Besides the 25 annual regular meetings, the commhsioners all panicijate on sabcommittees. The standing subcommitteefor Neighborhood Consistenqt meets at least 4 times a year; other single topic subcommittees will meet once or twtce a month for periods of two to stx months. For conventence of alt the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the business day (generatly at the beginning or end of the day). Diyoufeel that you have the time to make such a commitment? tt Oea, ql*no[€A shee,ls tt City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire Applicant Name: 4. What do you think are the three most signiJicant planning issues facing the City and why? Page2 t\see- qftha,htu& oh€ut-6 Lt 5. Please describe brtefly the neighborhood where you live. a. Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood & *Des trl-pheJ shee[s " I b. If you could, what two thinls about yqur neighborhood woald you change? \o6. llow do you feel about the city's recent action to require design review for changes to the business facades ii the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas? {, City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire Applicant Name: Page 3 *r, yt;#I#e community have you been a part of (please check all that applg: rented propefi (residential) ohtn a business in Burlingame have children in school :belong reltgtous oLt\ Other 8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you woald like to share with the City Council regarding planning for the City of Burlingame? \\ Dee q*+c€heA sluris g. Each applicant must'attend at least one planning commtssion meeting prior to his/her interview on Decimber 1,2001. The Planning Coimmission meets the 2d and 4h Monday of each month. Below, please indicate which meeting you will attentl I plan on attending the following comm$slon meeting(s) meeting and rememberto the Cor..r'O n*Please let SfuTT'know you ore in attendance at the Comm'ission applicant 's sign-up sheet at the meeting you attend Please return your application and supplemental questionnaire to: City Manager's Office Ctty of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road l Burlingame, CA 94010 All apptications and suppleinental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager's Office no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, March 2912402. --v-+C[.:\> City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire 1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, experience and community involvement will be a benelit to Planning Commission and community? My name is Ann Keighran and I have lived in Burlingame for the past twenty-five years. I have been fortunate to be provided the opportunity to watch Bvllingame evolve over these past years. My education focus has been in Nursing. I graduated from the University of San Francisco with alvlasrters Degree in Science andNursing. I have played a leadership role as a Charge Nurse and Clinical Educator in the past. From this, I have learned to assess, plan, implement, and evaluate. These are factors that are essential wtren looking at building projects. It is also important to note that before I was appointed onto the Planning Commission I took a course titled "Introduction to Building Code". In additioru I have worked as an administrative assistant and property rxmager for my husband's construction business. Both my family and my husband's family have been intimately involved in the construction business in San Francisco. This of course had rubbed offonto me; hence I applied for the Planning Commission in 1998 and forrunately had the opportunity to serve the City of Burlingame for the past four years. I have developed a wealth of information volunteering on this commission. The experience I have obtained is priceless. I am currently the Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission I have served on various subcommittees in the past few years. 1. Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee: This subcommittee evaluates the ongoing development of an effective architectural review process for the City ofBurlingame. 2. Second Unit Amnesty Program Subcommittee: This subcommittee developed guidelines to allow amnesty status to secondary residential units buih before 1954 to add to the current housing stock. 3. Specilic Area Plan Subcommittee: This committee will review the request for proposal and work with consultant to develop a SAP progru* foi the northern end of Burlingame. In the Hgusing Element ihis northern area was identified as having great potential for new residential development. When we look at the SAP, we will focus on details such as policy, land use, and zoning regu}ations. The area it will entail will be Rollins Road industrial area and the comrrercial area/residential area around Peninzula Hospital. My involvernent in the community will be beneficial to the Planning Commission My work ethic, good judgment and comrnon sense; and my ability to work as a leam member are characteristics that will prove to be quite important to rnaintain on the Planning Comnrissio1 My experience on the Planning Commission has been a positive one. I have been diligent, competent, and fair-minded. I have demonstrated my passion for this crty and have always worked in the best interest of Burlingame. I am pro development that is frir and incorporates the concerns ofour town 2, Please list the community activities or organizations you have participated in and indicate your level of involyement. Indicate the amount of time each month you spend on each of these activities. I am an involved parishioner at Our Lady of Angel's church and school. I volunteer in the l$ grade chsJroom once to twice a monttr- I also work the health room once a monttr- I have coached girl's basketball at OLA for the past three years. In addition I try to attend the OLA Mothers CIub rneetings once a month and I help out with various school and church events throughout the year. For example: School fair, Christmas gifts for less unforhrnate children, St. Patrick's Day dinner, and the school Silent Auction- In additiorU I am a member of the Burlingame Mothers Club. Involvernent is sporadic- I was on the Mothers Club Board two years ago. Final$ I am presently on the Planning Commission and as you are already aware ofl this takes up a lot of time. This entails reading endless reports, attending two meetings a month, special meetings sometimes in between, subcommitte. meslings: and site visits- 3. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Do you feel that you have the time to make such a commitment? Absolutely. I am fully aware ofthe commitment required due to the fact I am currently on the commission f wil continue to devote my time and energy to keep Burlingarne the desireable place to live and do business. 4. What do you think are the three most signilicant planning issues facing the City and why? a. Maintaining residential and commercial design review: I think desrgn review is the core and foundation of our city. It is important to continually evaluate this process so that we can maintain a clty that has a balance of growth and quality of life. This entails maintaining the historic character of Burlingame and keeping the crty moving forward commercially and economicallY. b. Development ofNorthern Burlingame: It is time to update this part oftown. There is great potential for new residential development. The impact of Bart will provide us a unique opportunity to create more housing and growth in this area. c. Bayshore development: We need to find a way to tie Surlingame east of 101 to the west side. I do not think the east side is fully utilized due to the divided barrier that exists. I think that future development should consider senior housing and/or mixed uses that incorporate beautifirl architecture, open park-like space and public amenities. It would be nice to have a project that incorporates business and residential needs. 5. Please describe briefty the neighborhood where you live. t. IdentiS two things you like most about your neighborhood: I live at 1531 Vancouver Avenuq. We are fortunate to live on a dead end street that is quiet and does not have traffic. We are in contact with our neighbors and our children play together. On the Fourth of Juty \rye have a fantastic block party and at Christmas time we get together for food and fun. We are close to Mercy where we can take walks and are close to Ray Park where the kids can play. School is just a walking distance away and we are also in close proximity to downtown Burlingame. My family and I are quite grateful for the neighborhood we live in- b. If you could, what two things about your neighborhood would you change? I wishpeople would utilize their garages and driveways for parking their own vehicles. Streets are becoming too cluttered with cars and I am also concemed that errergency vehicles may not be able to drive down these streets without a lot of difficulty. Maybe we should look into having two car parklng for houses that have three or more bedrooms. This would include tandemparking. Secondl5 I wish something would be done to ttre property located on the corner of Adeline and El Camino. It is such an eyesore looking at that cyclone fence all the time. 6. How do you feel about the city's recent action to require design review for changes to the business facades in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas? I think it is a very good idea that the crty now requires design review for changes to business facades in the Burlingame and Broadway areas. Both Broadway and Burlingame Avenue are high profile locations that have a direct impact to its neighboring community. It is just as important to preserve good architectural characteristics on business frcades as it is on residential hornes. 7.What groups within the community have you been a part oI? a- Homeowner b. Have children in school c. Belong to religious community(OlA) d. Burlingame Mothers Club 8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like to share with the City Council regarding planning for the City of Burlingame? It would be a good idea to develop a process where the Planning Commission and the City Council could have public joint meetings to discuss ideas and opinions of large upcoming developments. This would provide the opportunity of open communication between the council and commission. Secondly, I would just like to emphasize that the concept of a "Community Center" really incorporates the idea of a community not just teens. There are rumy people that keep calling this project a'oTeen Center". If this project is to be a big success, you need to incorporate everyone's needs. 9. I have been attending meetings for the past four years. Commissioner Application Form CITY OF BURLINGAME Commissioner Application Form Please print or type. Name: Address:?2a flwinhf Pn:d Rrrrl ira:ma 650- 432-7902 650- 375-L826 ckmccl eary@earthl i nk. net How long have you lived in Burlingame (years)? Nearly 6 Vears. Page I of4 MAR A I ?002 Burlingame registered voter to: Are you registered to vote in Burlingame? Yes ffi No o Education: University of MI Degree(s)/IVla jor(s): B.A. Journalism, '86, C.D. '91 Occupation / Specialty: Attorney at Visa International Please accept this as my application for a position on the (select only one)z o Beautilication Commission o Civil Service Commission o Library Board o Parks & Recreation Commission FFlanning Commission o Traffic Safety Parking Commission o Mosquito Abatement District Signature:Date: Please return your application azd supplemental questionnaire to: Vi Weber, Executive Assistant City Manager's OIIice 501 Primrose Road http ://www.burlingame. org/counciVcommissioner_application_form.htm 3t29/2002 Commissioner Application Form Page 2 of 4 cA 94010 Revised 3/6/2002 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire Applicants Name:Chri stopher McCl eary To assist in the selection process, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with your application form. Responses should be pdtledqMed. You may use additional sheets of paper. Thank you. 1. Please comment on how you feel that your education, training, *perience and comruunity involvement, will be a beneftt to Plauning Commission and community? lly contrjbution to the Planning Commission would be of the "FreshIdeas"and "Fresh Perspectiv-e" type. Ey educational background hasdirected toward learning to (i) identify and analyze 'issues clearlthink broadly about how to deal with them; and (i'ii) communicate't and poss'i bl e sol utions cl ear'ly. My prof ess'ional background as att bus'iness professional has fol lowed the same themes, and added lots be v; he en(ii1 issues ey andorn ofexperience in balancina comoetino and often eouall v- metitorious -interests.2. Plesse list the communifit activities"or orgahizationsttou have participated ih and ififlicate your level oJ involvement (member, altended event, ran a booth, worked on the organix,ing committee, h)as an officer, etc.). Indicate the omount of time each month you spend on each of these activities. (1., cont'd.): These skills and experiences, I believe, will allow me tobring to the Commission a reasonable and common-sens'ical v'iewpoint and theability to help the group and the City to rneet'planning tssues effectively. 2. This application represents my first attempt to get'involved in the Burl ingame commun'i ty in an off icial capacity. My wife and I have grown tofeel strongly about Burlingame sjnce moving here from San Francisco in 1996, and both hope to start to do what we th'ink we can do best to contri bute toits continued well-being. Thus, this application, and the bad typing (sor,ry) 3. The position of Planning Commissioner is a big commitment. Besides the 25 annual regular meetings, the commissioners all participate on subcommittees. The standing subcommilteefor Neighborhood Consistency meets at least 4 times a year; other single topic subcommittees will meet once or twice a month for periods of two to sk months. For convenience of all the commissioners some of these meetings are held during the business day (generally at the beginning or end of the day). Do youfeel that you have the time to make such a commitment? oint in my career where I am able to adjust my schedule as al ance competing time-demands as needed. As I sai d above, my community is a omrfiiss'ion of my des'i ree no s uch t i me demands I am now at needed and tcontfibuting assure the C I f there wer apob to pr atti iority with me. For these reasons, I can nd wil I ingness to partici pate fu1 1y.hat go al ong wi th Commi ttee part j ci pat'ion cation; my 'interest is not in ceremonialI would not be submitting this appactivities but r-atlrer in.payticjpa.ting i_n the lr'fe o-f ^Burlingame meaningfu'l 1y4. ll/hat do you think are the three most si$niJicant plaizning issfues facing the City and why? 1. Balanc'i ng the need to maintain and develop a commercial tax base and thedesire to mainta'i n B'game's innate character and liveability.2. Deve'loping and enhancing B'game's ability to act not as a,,bedroom http://www.burlingame.org/counciVcommissioner_application_form.htm 312912002 Commissioner Application Form Page 3 of 4 ...community"but rather as a complete community, €.g., with inherent re- sources of dntertainment and culture, kids and youth activities, (ey-service providers and employers, so that residents of Bigame continue to feel that tfrey are part of a Oistinct community and are inclined to act accordingly. 3. A1 I owi ng B'game res idents to update and expand appropri 9te1 y whi I e pres- ervino B'oaile's innate character and characterist'ice. i would rather go'into.Y.hti,E*ui[]",Pt"U,9"rE'thl\tfi fb%Fnbilfi n"f &5#fr "2.I currently l ive in the "Burl ingables" area movi ng to the "Easton Addi t'ion" area. Both family residence neighborhoods. o- Identify two things you like most about your neighborhood Burlingables is filled with people who are proud of thein homes and town, and who ar6 ready and willing to "p'itch in" on neighborhood projects or activities and show contern for their neighbors generally. Burlingabl'es offers a family the simultendous benefits of living in an independant and private home and of being part of a connected community. These two faCtorS make it an ideal place to raise a fam'i 1y. I have the same impression of the area to which we plan to move. I think these characteristjcs are directly affected by matters addressed at the City and Plann'ing CommisS jon level. b. If you could, what two thilngs about your neighbdrhood would you change? If I could, I would wipe out ambient noise in the neighborhood from nearby ht$hway 101. I would also add a stop sign to the end of my block to slow traffic a.-bit (corner of Dwight and C'l arendon). Not much to complajn about, in my opinion. I would l'ike, though, to encourage development of pockets of retail and service busjnesses in and near other B'game ne'ighborhoods, though, so residents in those neighborhoods could enjoy walking to do more shopping and errands, as we do in Burlingahles. See answer 2. to question 4, above. 6. How do you feet about the city's recent action to reqaire design review for changes to the business facades in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas? I support theraction and wish it had come earlier. Applied reasonably, there is no reason that such requirements need cause significant problems for affected businesses, and the results of coordinated review 6f City archi- tectural details such as these can have draffiatic effect on the "feel" of the town to res'idents and visitors. The creamery br'rllboard d'i scovered last year along Cal ifornia street when the auto parts shop was raised, was a fantasticplus for that area. Deta'i ls like that, whibh can create a sense of "p1ace" and prevent Burlingame Avenue from proceed.ing further down the path of becomi ng a s impl e and f acel ess shoppi ng ma1 'l , are ci"i ti cal . 7. ll/hat groups within the community have you been a part of (please check all thot apply): of are town, and dm i n medium-to-high the process.l dens'ity fingle xxx xtrx_ homeowner rented prop erty (r esidential) work in Burlingame own a business in Burlingame have children in school belong to a religious comruunity Other http ://www.burlingame. org/counciVcommissioner_application-form.htm 3129/2002 Commissioner Application Form Page 4 of 4 8. Are there any other ideas or opinions you would like lo share with the City Council regarding planning for the City of Burlingame? Not in this forum, thanks. I would welcome discussion of p'l ann'in of course, if the Counctl feels that it would be worthwhile to fu cons'i der my part'i c'i pation on the Committee. Thank you. gm rth atters, er 9. Each appttcant must sttend al least one planning commission meeting prior to his/her interview. The Planning Commission meets the 2d and 4 Monday of each month. Below, please indicate which meeting you will attend. f phn on attending the following commission meeting(s)*:I'10 n da A ri I 8 2002 *Please let staff know you are in attendance at the meeting and remember to sign the Commission applicant's sign-ap sheet at the meeting you attend" Please rehrrn your application and supplemental questionnaire to: City Manager's Office City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 All applications and supplemental questionnaires must be received in the City Manager's Office no later than 5:00 PM on Friday, March 29,20A2. http ://www.burlingame. orglcounciVcommissioner_application_form.htrn 3129/2002 t urrurussluflEl ftlrpuuauuu rull[r r4BE t ur 4t -6 CITY OF BT]RLINGA}IE I a''. -ii. t-.1.!:!,,il4f .-:l:ril Commissioner Application Form Plcase print or lype./il' Name: Address: Phonel (day)f Email (optional)l(evening) ?A6?Aotre (&,%;704 Vffi@/y6f@,a/t How long have you lived in Burlingame (yearc)?ifw MAR 2 I 2002 ? Br.liogu." registered voter OPto: P Are you registered to vote in Burlingame?Yes ? NO? Education:Ilegree(s/Majo(s):loWwr fl,*zzas ftJ ltru4ttzznr,P*> Occupation / Specialty:4@//rq Please accept this as my application for a position on the (selcct only one)t ? Beautification Commission ? Civil Service Commission ? LibraryBoard ? Parks & Recreation Commission ? Planning Commission , , Safety Parking Commission District Please return application ocd sup plemental Vi Weber, Executive Assistant City Manager's Offrce 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 T Date: fi le: //C : WyTo20Documents\slv\Commi ssionerTo20 Apphcattoto/o20Form lrtm 3l28lo2 \-orlrurrssr(,Irer frpprruatroll r (,[n ra$e z or I Revised 3/6,2002 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Supplemental Questionnaire Applicants Name: To assist in the seleotion prooess, please answer the following questions and submit written responses with your applioation form. Responses should be printed or typed. You may use additional sheets of paper. ftank you. 1. Pbase comrtsrt on how youleelthd your educdion, taining, qrcrience ond commsnity kvolvenufi, will be a benefa to Pbnning Commissi.on and cotttnanity ? fu"tu /1rr744-t@ /*,ry46 2 Hcose list the comrutntly adivtlics or organizdions you have porticipded k and indbdc your level oJinvolvement (menber, dended evetrt, rot a booth, worhed on the organizing cornndfree, wcs @t offrcer, etc.). Indicdc the amount of li.ne each nonth yott spend on eoch of these activttics. 3. The position of Planning Conmissioner is a big commihwnL Besifus the 25 annual regulu medings, the commissioners allpailicipdc on subconnifrees. The stutiling subcomnifteetor Neighborhood Consistcnqr mceb d lcast 4 times a yeoq other singlc toptc subcommifrees will ned once or twice u monthfor periods of trw to six nnnlhs. For convenicnce of aA ilte comnissianerc some of these mcetings ue held during the business day (generally d the beginnkg or end of th" ,t"y). Do you feel thd you ha,e the time to mahe such a cormituunt? 4. Whd do you ddnh arc the three most stgnWm plmming issues facing the Cily and why? fi I e: //C : MyYoZ0D ocuments\slv\Commi ssionero/o20Application%2OF orm.htm 3/28102 tulryta \/urrrrlusslorrcr frPllruau(,Ir r ofllr rage J or z{ 5. Ptcase describe bricfu the neighborhoodwhere you Eve. *anw@ leffitdtr9 a ldcnti{y two frings yoa likc most aboul your neighborhood b. If you could,whdtwothings aboulyour neighborhoodwouUyoa change? 6. How do you feel obout ilte cig/s recent adbn to requ*e dcsign revien' for changes to the basiness facadcs in the Bwlingame Avenuc and Broadway arcas? X, homcowner---f- + rentcdproperty (residentiag {, umrk in Burlingune--r-'- & own abusinessin Barllngame &- have children in school S bebng to a religtaus commanily file://C:\Myolo20Documents\slv\Commissionef/o20Application%20Form.htm 3/28/02 7. What gtoups wtthin the comrunity have you beea a pot of (please chech allthd afiy): uommlssroner Appllcauon r ofin Page 4 ot 4 & Are there any odter ideas or opinions yoa would lihe to share wilh lhe Cily Council regarding planningfor the Cfu of Burlinganu? rya frtrlvl-ru %2M/,w> 9. Each applicant rrutst frznd d lzast one plmniag cotttttission meding prior to hi,s/her intemicw. The Plannkg Corrrrts$on ncds tile 2d od 4 Monday of each month. Below, plcase iadicde whbh nceting yoa will dcnd I plmt on dtznding thefollowing commission mceling(s)*: *Please lct stfi know you are in dendance d fie meeting ond rem,ember to sgn t*e Connt*sion applicafi's sign-up sheet dthe meeting you &cnd Please return your applioation and zupplemental questionnaire to: City Manager's Offioe City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 All applications and supplemental quertionnaires must be rcceived in the City Manager's Office no later than 5:(X) PM on Friday, March 2912002. file://C:\MyYo20Documents\slv\Commissioner9/o20Applicationo/o20Form.htm 3124102 Burlingarne Planning Comrnissions Application Response to Ouestions 1. My value to the City as a Planning Commissioner lies not only in the fact that I am experienced as a commissioner and familiar with our planning issug but also in my professional experience and my ability to make informed decisions that will benefit the City and the applicant. 2. Planning Commissioner -4 years with an impeccable service record, including one term as chairman; Subcommittees of the Burlingarne Planning Commission- Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee, RFP Subcommittee forNorth Burlingame SAP, North Burlingame SAP Subcommittee, various individual projed subcommittees. Lions T-Ball assistant coach 3. Yes I am able to continue with my duties as a Planning Commissioner 4. Densification of the North part of toum around the BART station- This will be a difficult notion for the residents to understand because generally people do not want to see the City bqcome'bigger", The area around the BART station will be under pressure to change and if done thoughtfully it can present an ideal opportunity for densification. Traffic- Something has to be done with the Broadway at 101 interchange. This is a main entrance to our crty and the performance and appearance ofthe area should be improved. Parking- I think the parking problem around our retail areas is a good problem and can be made to work better. The problem is as much a matter of perception as it is a reality. Shoppers must learn to use the vacant parking lots that are within walking distance of shopping areas. 5a. The neighborhood where I live is predominately single family houses on larger than typical lots. Much of the housing stock is old and will be replaced or improved. There are also small pockets of neighborhood retail and service areas that if enhanced can provide a valuable pedestrian amenity. 5b. I would like to see the number of vehicles on the streets reduced, especially commercial vehicles. Additionally I would like to reduce tie maximum allowable building envelope in the Rl zone. 6. Up to this time the process has been an effortless check point in the entitlement process. In the future I believe it will serye the City well as a check point for projects that will directly affect the pedestrian environment on our two main pedestriarlretail streets. 8. Over the last 4 years, planning issues and glowth have come to the attention of the public. I believe this is an expanding trend and is due to the educated and aware population that now resides in Burlingame. Over the past 4 years there have been several changes in the planning process, not only in Burlingame but also on the Counfy and State levels. Unfortunately this seems to manifest itself in ever-increasing regulatiorl but our City has done an excellent job of streamlining the regulation process and is headed in the right direction. Lets keep up the good work. Also I would like to see Burlingame recruit more industry- biotech, communications, technology, etc. 9. tr have attended the 4l25lo2 Planning Commission meeting. AGENDA ITEN,I #8a STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council April5,2002 Fire Department Purchase of New Fire Engine MTG. DATE 4lLsl02 TO: DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: SUBMITED BY: A BY Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council approve the purchase of a new fire engine to replace a 1987 engine that is still on front line status. Backqround: Our fleet of fire apparatus (engines and truck) consists of the following: 1 - 2001 Pierce Dash Engine 1 - 1998 Pierce Quantum Engine 2 - 1987 Pierce Lance Engines 1 - 1995 Pierce Aerial Truck One of the 1987 Pierce Engines is in reserve status and the other is still a first out, front line unit. We have been experiencing age and wear problems with the 1987 engines and within the last year we replaced the engine and transmission in one of them. Our vehicle replacement plan is set up to replace the engines after twelve years of seruice. The 1987 engines are well beyond the replacement timeline. We do feel that the 1987 engine with the new engine and transmission could serve us well as a reserve unit for a few more years but due to the number of calls we do not feel it would be reliable as a front line unit. It is for these reasons that we are requesting to replace one of the 1987 engines at this time. We are requesting to purchase a 2002 Pierce Dash on a participating public agency option of a City of San Diego bid process. The San Diego Bid process evaluated the proposals from three major manufacturers and Pierce was awarded the contract. The other two bidders requested a large number of manufacturing exceptions as options and did not offer the early payment discounts that was available through pierce Manufacturing. Exhibit:. Proposal from Pierce Manufacturing. Bid evaluation memo from Asst. Chief Musso (due to size the bid documents are available upon request) Budqet Impact: The proposed purchase price is $370,644.75 with a $5,252.00 chassis pre-payment discount for a final cost of $364,959.46 if we take advantage of the discount. Asst. City Manager Rahn Becker has confirmed that the necessary funds are available in the Vehicle Replacement Fund. I'oLrr-rv I ci 20_o2- City of Burlingame Fire De Partment PROPOSALi399 Rollins Road FOR FURNISHING Burlingame, California 940i0 @ FIRE APPARATUS The undersigned is-prepared to manufacture.foryou,gpon an order being placed by you, for final acceptance byPierce MT-rufacturing, Inc., at its home office in Appllton, frisconsin, ttr" uppLlt"r u"d "quip*"nt herein niroea anafor the following prices: (i) DASH 2000 pumper wirh TAK-4 Fronr Suspension.s 342, 1q7 .00 Cr s TSM 5OO TSSO Torn e tr'oam Pro OO2 ?-aoenr Foam stem: 67t' cab with 10" Raise Roof: 5- noci ton 3 radi o Head sets Clark Tntere om Svstem I vmpnf fnr hncei q ,n^rr: Sep nra t 8.257. Sales Tax San Mateo Coun ty 28 ,247 .7 5 Total $37 0 ,644 .7 5 at our office at Appleton, Wisconsin, and to be delivered to you at Bur ngame Citv Depar Brrrl nqame - eA -401 0 Said apparatus and equipment are to be bqilt and--shipped in accordance with the specifications hereto attached,delays due to strikes, waioi international conflict, failurJii" out"in chassis,;;t;;;ffo. oth";;;;;;;u"yoia o,ri control not preventing, within 65eu6 2 I 0-240 )urettlgg days after receipt of this order and the acceptance thereof t, Unless accepted within 30 days from date, the right is reserved to withdraw this proposition. SALES REPRESE By: Dave Murphy INC. 1500 GPM two stage Waterous pump. 600 Ga11on Water Tank, I GOIDEN STAT E FIRE APPARATUS, INC. 1237 Doker Drive Modesto, cA 9535.1-1598 Chassis lf a chassis p days prior to final invoice: Office: (209) 522-0422 Fax: (209) 522-0464 www.Gol den teFi re.com BURLINGAME FIRE DEPT. Payment Options - DASH pUMpER February 1,2002 Pre-Pav ment ALL I TEMS AB OVE AR EPERA PPARATUS ayment in the amount of $175,058.00 were made approximately ninety (90)completion of the apparatus, the following Oi..orniliorlA be applied to the One (1) DASH pUMpER ----.-_-.--.---.- $342,397.00 g "Your satisfaction is our commitment.,, Burlingame Fire Depailment Memo To! From! GG: Date: Re: Chief Reilly Ken Musso, Asst. Chief 4t5t2002 2002 Fire Engine Purchase The included competing bids, including the successful award to pierce lvlanufacturing, are substantially more than Burlingame's modified version. This difference is primarily due to the fact that the san Diegc units are delivered with substantially more equipment, such as binoculars, sledgehammers, Holmatro Rescue equipment, etc. It is recommended that the City of Budingame accept the Public Agency Bid From the City of San Diego of April 25,2001. Note that on page 3, item three (City of San Diego bid no. 4018-01-A) the City (San Diego) may desire to exercise an option to review the contract for four (4) additional years and that any proposed option year increase shall not increase by more than 3% of prices in effect at the end of the current contract year. Note also on Page 5 item F (City of San Diego bid 4018-01-A) Public Aqencv states that any other public agency shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this bid solicitation. The bid prices for the hiple combinations engines are as follows . American La France $394,647 . Westates $403,375 . Pierce $411,761 Note that the Pierce price does not include the pre-paid chassis discount of g5,886 or the $2.OOO discount for multiple units. An additional discount of 916,222 is available for payment of units within 10 days of contracl acceptance. westates offers a discount for multiple orders. American LaFrance did not offer discount options. Due to the large number of manufactunng exceptions opted by westates and American LaFrance, the city of san Diego chose to award this public agency bid to pierce lrilanufacturing. a Page 1 STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COT]NCIL DArE: 8 Apr 02 FRoM: Gary Missel, Chief of Police AGENDA 8bITEM# MTG. DATE 4lLsl02 SUBMITTED drP SLJBJECT: Request for full-time parking enforcement officer (PEO) position RECOMMENDATION: The Chief of Police recommends that one of the currently authorized part-time PEO positions be converted to a full-time position. BACKGROUIID: The police department is cumently authorized four (4) full-time and two (2) part- time parking enforcement officers (PEOs).In the 2002-03 Parking Budget requestr l have asked to convert one of the part-time PEO positions to a full-time PEO. This request is based on the increased wor*load we have experienced since the parking meter rates were increased earlier this year. The increased rates nearly doubled our collection efforts. To maintain adequate collections, Liz Roscoe has been forced to spend a great deal of her work time with collections rather than meter maintenance, her primary assignment. As a result, at present, our parking meter maintenance is not up to standard. I believe that converting one of the part-time PEO positions to full-time status will allow adequate meter collections and the proper level of meter maintenance. The additional cost of this conversion from part- time to full-time PEO is appnoximately $45,160. BY BY ATTACHMENTS: AGENDA rtEMNO.: 8c STAFF REPORT MTG- DATE:4^st02 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE:Aolil9-2002 F'ROM:Public Works By SUBJECT: Resolution Regulating Parking at City Licensed Property at the Corner of Marsten Road and Rollins Road and Authorizing the Towing of Non-Authorized Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution to have vehicles that don't belong to the City or City employees towed from the lot at the southeast corner of Marsten Road and Rollins Road *h"r, partea in violation of the vehicle code. BACKGROUND: The City has recently leased space at the southeast corner of Marsten Road and Rollins Road for parking of City vehicles and City employee vehicles due to inadequate space at the temporary Public Works Corpoiation Yard and along adjacent streets. It is important to restrict other vehicles from the lot in order to sustain adequate access at all times which is vital to the functioning of the Public Works Department. The lot will be properly posted, and the resolution will enable enforcement. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A; Map of Lease Property BUDGET IMPACT: None c City Clerk, Public Works Superintendent By s:v PUaLlc woRKs otREctoRvlsr FF REpoRrs\Tow vEHtcLEs FRoM MARsTEN-RoLLtNs Lor.Doc RESOLUTION NO. 4o-2oo2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME REGULATING PARKING AT CITY LICENSED PROPERTY AT THE COR}IER OF MARSTEN ROAD AND ROLLINS ROAD AI\ID AUTHORIZING THE TOWING OF NON.AUTHORIZED VEHICLES FROM THE LICENSED PROPERTY RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME, California, that: WHEREAS, the City has been granted a license to use the real propefi located on the southeast corner ofRollins Road and Marsten Road inthe CityofBurlingame to provide parking for City-owned vehicles and equipment and vehicles operated by City employees; and WHEREAS, pursuantto Vehicle Code section2265l(n),thispropertyis onlyforuse bythese types ofvehicles and not for use by others; and WHEREAS, ttre ability ofthe City to sustain this access at all times is vital to the functioning ofthe Public Works Departrnent so that removal ofunauthorized vehicles is necessaryto ensure this access and security, NOW' THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: l. No person shall park any vehicle on the City-licensed property at the southeast comer of Rollins Road and Marsten Road unless authorized by the City to do so. The property is reserved for the use of City employees' vehicles and City vehicles and equipment only. 2. The Burlingame Police Departrnent is authorized to remove any vehicle or equipment in violation of this restriction in accordance with Vehicle Code section 22651(n). 3 . The restrictions set forttr in this resolution shall be operative upon the installation ofsigns MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, CityClerkofthe CityofBurlingame, do herebycertiffthatthe foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the Eauy o1 APRIL 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES COUNCILMEMBERS: BAyLocK, coFFEr, SALLIGATT, JANNHT, orHAEoNy NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: Not{E ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: N9}IE 41912002 Ornou CITY CLERK giving notice of these limitations 000 ro 7 sNi -7 7ou-Nf-rsavn fioa! s31clH3A MoLlaodfd JJVIs\arv 70\sf7tJ tlNulJ-Nt Auvaodr{3.alsgNr-tJ3s -lvJo-riNosufoNy'71s9N/t1fs oNV slN?wn300\:c lr lS-5 '.lI l.: . . -a .l* rtf - ,t 3a t. I - 4rJ\ . : '' MA RsT E 'v RoAt rtEilt$trt ' i5prTat ; .t :.1 I ofr r., -:::;: tii:;,'..: ?'.t.7.;:..1' .,: ' .' - S.E.E. T3 FARC, P.6. t '$ rts,\t- 0J alrFr rE IAs iL l-r ,{ rL.4( .1. , i-l , tr, r lj' .'-i )a6 t:1 . il. ':l i "trJ; ' :.!ri ,r.t ]:I .1,1, .': 1,ii 'ri'.i :1..-. r t ir-. ,.,1n 'l.r\i ,i ,5o+ * St * rlu\ orfr \n :--rI -- {J ul F fP C{a tJfr aF rlo ) -r- t. {r A a?I I q. s (D ti{ .l: ((C $2,545,202.20 Ck. No. 81663 - 82190 Excludes Library Cks. 81663 - 8.1702 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for March 2002 $2,162,128.34 Ck. No. 146635 - 147834 *EFTS for March 2002 $490,399.86 -ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding SDI (State Disability) PERS- Health Benefits Retirement oq(D =q cl, (D3 0o tr =.D(D =0qoo, .D n I G, SlFINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS ( 04-05-2002 CITY OF BURLINGAIIIE!/ARRANT REGISIER FUIID RECAP - O1-02 PAGE 9 AI4OUNT 95,z5,A9 '1 1 1 ,500.01 610.00 20 ,110.65 132,501 .33 2,712.61 526.99 32,732.20 26,007.75 7,760.94 1 ,985.08 1 ,161 ,22 10,500.52 NAME FUND 101 320 326 327 526 527 528 529 6'18 619 620 621 731 GENERAL FUXD CAPITAL II,iPROVEMENTS FUND IJATER CAP ITAL PROJECT FU'ID SE!'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TJATER FUND SEt,JER FUND SOLID HASIE FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURA}ICE FUND FACILIIIES SERVICES FUND EOUI PI4ENT SERVICES FUND IIIFORMATION SERVICES FUND IRUST AIID AGENCY FUI'ID TOTAL FOR APPROVAL HONORABTE UAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: 9443,70r.19 THIS IS TO INCLUSIVE, THE AI,IOUNT OTT I CIALS, ACCOROANCE CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTEO ON PA6ES iIUI.4BERED TRO}I 1 THROUGH 9 AIIO/OR CLAII.IS NUiIBERED 'RO.I 82085 THROUGH 82190 I}ICLUSIVE,TOTALTNG IN OT 5443,705.19, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETATL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AIID III }.tY OPINION REPNESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN IJITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS TNDICATED IHEREO}I. RESPECTFULLY SUBI4ITTED, DATEF INANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT DATECdJNCI L (( ( NUI.IBER }IAI,iE 8?182 82185 82186 82187 82188 82189 TOTAL ( CITY OT BTJRLINGAMEI/ARRAI,IT REGISTER 04/05/02 VENDOR DETAILr*. oenotes tland Uritten Checks 60 00 '101 31510 731 22518 PAGE 8 AI.IOtJNT 126,60 150.00 830.00 4,000.00 1 ,4 t5.00 71 .52 1,080.00 650.00 1?9.11 s443,705,19 ACCOUNT 23585 82183 E}IERALD PLUI,IBING & FIRE PROTECTI 23586 DEPOSI T REFUXDS 82181 GOLDEN ROOFING CO. I,4I SCELLANEOUS I,4 I SCE L LANE CI{,'S iICCALLION CONSIRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUIIDS JIM HERSHEY INC. DEPOSIT REIUNOS CHRIS GLUD PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PC iIALL I.I I SC. SUPPL IES BRIAN FORTIN I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 122 1 150.00 r51 22520 GFOA TRAI N I NG EXPENSE 82190 I.IOHAL'K T I II I SH I NG PROUCTSllsc. suPPLlEs 23587 23588 23589 23590 23591 23192 23593 830.00 731 22520 /.,000.00 731 22520 r,415.00 320 80270 210 71.52 101 68010 120 '1100 1,080.00 526 69020 120 650.00 101 64250 260 129.14 619 61160 120 5120 ( (( CITY OF BURLINGA}IE9ARRAt,IT REGISTER 04/05/02 VENDOR DETAI L '*r Denotes Hand l'rritten Checks NUMBER NA}18 82170 82171 8?172 82173 82174 EPS, rNC. I.IISCELLA ECUS NOBLE TRACTOR INC. BLDG. & GROUNDS MAIi/I. OTD REPUBLIC TITLE PROFESSIO}.IAL & SPECIAL IZED S ACCOUNT 2,640.00 320 75110 210 269.84 620 15000 340.00 101 68010 220 1161 9,431.93 320 75110 210 937.50 618 64520 038 118.13 320 80140 220 32t.00 526 36730 71.n 101 68020 190 2200 800.00 320 80200 210 241.83 526 69020 260 65.00 61A 64520 604 750.00 B1 22520 300,00 731 22520 PAGE 7 82168 UIII VERSAL SPECIALT I ES, INC. I.i I SC. SUPPLIES 82159 42166 IIOVA PARTNERS, IIIC. PROIESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S 82167 EAST BAY TRUCK CE IITER SUPPL IES KELLY VENEZIA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HARRIS DES!GN PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S T}IE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP I.I I SCELLANEOTIS LONE STAR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HOI.4E DEPOT I{ I SC. SUPPLIES SI.IALL TOOLS 23236 23295 23311 23320 23329 23367 ?3375 23381 23547 ?3578 23579 23581 23582 23543 A}IOUNT 2 t 640.00 269.84 191,65 9,834,93 937,50 1 18. 13 720 "39 325-00 71 .n 800- 00 244.83 65.00 750.00 300.00 356.67 363.72 619 61460 120 5180 619 64460 130 82178 DAVID FEREIIC I.I I SCELLANE(l'lS 82175 82176 82179 82180 TOM POSEY DEPOSIT RETUNDS GREER GARDENS DEPOSI T RETUNDS 82181 ICISF TRAINING EXPE}ISE 23581 342.00 101 65200 260 342.00 ( 340.00 191.65 619 64160 120 5150 82177 CHAI{PIO}I AMERI CA TRAI}IIIIG EXPENSE 23580 ( NUI.IBER NAI.IE 821r1 82',152 82153 82155 82158 42159 82160 82161 82163 42164 8,265.71 't ,831 .20 22,000.00 529 36715 529 68030 213 529 68030 220 PAGE 6 AITIOUNT 32,096.91 3,669.67 142.70 526.99 5,000.00 89,077.13 50.00 63.22 557 .02 513.00 8, 798.00 1,056.00 75.00 1 ,250.00 (( CITY OF BURLINGAIIE!/ARRANT REGISTER 01t05/0? VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes lland L/ritten Checks ACCOUNT 21918 21980 22324 22624 22660 22769 22894 22499 22917 ?3076 23097 23178 82157 ctiRls I LAilo COIITRACTUAL SERVICES Z.A. P. MANUFACTURIXG TRAFFIC CONTROL }IATERIALS 82154 THERr.to GAS TECtt PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S REED EOUIPI.IEI{T CO CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT PIT},IEY BO!]ES RESERVE ACCOJNT MISCELLANEOUS PENI},ISULA TORD OF SAII BRUNO SUPPLIES PENINSULA UNI FORM & EOUIPI.iENT UNI FORI.IS A}ID EOUIPI.IENT ALYSON ZUPPERO CONTRACIUAL SERVICES }.iI CHAEL STERT CONIRACTUAL SENVICES MAZE & ASSOCIATES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,669.67 '101 68020 800 2200 14?.70 101 66210 222 526.99 528 66500 210 5,000.00 101 15500 89,0n.13 320 80270 220 50.00 101 58010 220 1581 63.22 620 15000 557,02 101 65100 140 513.00 101 68010 220 1461 8,798.00 101 65100 220 1,056.00 101 64420 011 75.00 101 68010 220 1581 1,250,00 101 64560 220 SAI,I I4ATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPAR 22943 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8216? TIERIT RESOURCE GRqJP TETPORARY EI.IPLOYUENT SVC. 82165 NADI NE ROI{SON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23195 157.50 101 68010 220 1461 157.50 VB GOLF LLC I.I I SCELLANECT'IS RECREATIOI/ PROGRAI'I EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES 2?219 8?156 B 1 ENTERPRISE CORP. COIITRACTUAT SERVICES ( IIUI{BER }IAI,IE 82139 82140 82142 82113 82111 82115 42146 82147 82148 C. H. BULL CO.{PANY EOUI P}IEI,IT I.iAI NT. ACCOTJNT 924.13 101 65200 160 ?31.6 101 680?0 200 2200 ( CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!iARRANT REGI STER 04/05/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks PAGE 5 82'138 AT&T L'IRELESS cor,fi4uil I cAT I 0N s 20301 20459 20501 20639 20716 20801 20876 21110 21216 21521 21421 AMOUNT 231.66 600.00 359.76 6?3,25 500,00 565.56 776.18 892.57 oo./t 672.00 25 .77 300.00 LYNX TECI{}IOLOGIES TRAI}iING EXPEIISE TRAI}IINC EXPE}ISE TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE 00 00 00 101 66210 260 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 200 200 ?00 21741 82119 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE !/EST, I 21819 OFFICE EXPENSE 82150 LARRY AIIDERSON iIISCELLANEOUS CATHERI }IE J.I.I. NI LMEYER MISCELLANECI',S H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 8LDG. & GROU}IDS MA I }IT. OUICK MIX CONCRETE SIDEI.'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE REDI.IOOO GEIIERAL T IRE SUPPLIES ctTIcoRP vEltDoR FINAT/CE, INC. EoUIPIIENT llAINT. SKYHAIIKS SPORTS ACADEUY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SEI,JER RAT DEPOSI T REFUTIDS 359.75 101 66210 120 623.25 101 64350 031 500.00 731 ??525 565.55 101 68020 190 2200 776,18 101 66210 219 492,57 620 15000 66.7'1 101 65200 200 672.00 10't 68010 e20 1347 ?5.77 '10't 65200 110 300.00 731 ?2520 ( 82141 sAsE cstPANY, rxc. IlISC. SUPPLIES 924,13 ( iIUI'IBER IIAME a2124 82125 82126 82130 82'r 3l 82132 82133 82134 82135 82136 CITY OF BURLINGAME TIARRAIIT REGISTER 04/05 /02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r oenotes Hand l.rritten Checks PAGE 4 ITROI CITY HALL }lAINTENAIICE SAI,I DIEGO POLICE EOUIPI.IENT CO POLICE- -SUPPLtES Hq,SE OF SRECKERS SUPPLIES SAN MATEO RENTALS RENTS & LEASES NATURCLEA},I }IISC. SUPPL IES PRETERRED ALLIANCE PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S 18633 82128 LAEOR READY, INC. TEI.IPORARY EI.IPLOY}iENT SVC. 18559 8?129 82127 PE nSULACoIFLICT I.IISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE VERIZOIi lIIRELESS I,IESSAGING SERVI 18763 co,0{uNIc,loNs ACCOTJNT 8,218.75 101 64560 120 786,91 621 64450 200 ?,788.52 101 65100 126 561.00 101 64560 290 678.00 526 69020 011 39.37 526 69020 160 90.00 tot 68020 180 2200 1,9U.50 527 66120 120 ?37,60 101 64420 210 16247 16913 18026 18830 1902' 19047 19100 19852 AMOUNT 8,218.75 746.91 4',11.15 551.00 39.37 90.00 1,984.50 237,60 652.10 117,a9 11 .20 565.60 GOETZ BROTHERS t.II SC. SUPPLIES CON]RACTUAL SERVICES BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES ISC- St.tPPLTES CHI LD CARE C@RDIIIATING COUNCIL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 187 264 101 68010 120 1583 520 80190 2203 97 I.4ON I CA OLSEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147,89 320 79100 120 555.50 10'l 68010 220 1451 ( 42137 EL CAI.II}IO CIIARTER LIXES INC CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES 20'105 1 ,314.25 ( 2,788.52 678.00 82123 DOI,BLETREE HOTEL ilI SC. SUPPLIES 411,35 620 15000 14767 19045 11.20 101 68010 220 1460 1,311,25 101 58010 220 1322 ( NUi.IBER }IAI.IE 82116 82117 82118 ( CITY OF BURL I NGAME I.IAR RA I'1 T REGI STER 01/05 /02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes HEnd Lrritten Checks 551.86 717 .22 975.16 1 19. 18 357.79 96.00 45.00 200.00 54.00 3,028.50 126,7A 289.4A 47.r0 PAGE 3 AttouIT 2,928.00 63.81 1t5,29 18.082.61 13.n 146,40 6,911 .47 146.00 209.00 4,032.00 82112 SAX IATEO COUftTy SSERIfF'S OFC. 09433 PRI SONER EXPETSE 82113 STER ICYCLE, INC. SUPPLIES 09439 82114 SIERRA PACITIC TURF SUPPLY I.i I SC. SUPPL IES 09159 2,928.00 101 65100 291 63.81 101 65200 112 135.29 529 68030 120 4200 82115 ABAG . LIABI L ITY PROFESSIOIIAI & SPECIALIZED S CLAIIlS PAYI.iENTS 61A 64520 210 618 64520 601 303, 10 /'3.30 '101 64400 120 101 64420 150 09518 09720 10620 13720 13815 15250 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 10'l 101 101 t0l 101 731 65100 65100 65400 65400 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 65100 22571 110 120 140 160 200 201 202 ?20 240 260 291 292 SEAUOIA U}I I ON HIGH SCHOOL OFFICE EXPENSE PIP PRIIITING I.i I SC. SUPPLIES PUELICATIO}IS & AOVERTISING 13,79 101 68020 110 2100 BURL I XGAI.,IE POLICE DEPT OFFICE EXPEiISE I.IISC. SUPPLIES UNI FORI'IS AND EOUIPI'IE}IT co,{4ux I cAT l0N s EOUI PI.IENT I,IAI IIT. GAS, OIL & GREASE VEIIICLE I.IAI IIT. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRTPTIONS TRAINI NG EXPENSE PRISONER EXPENSE POLICE I}IVESTIGATIOI/ EXPENSE I,{ I SCELLA}IEOUS 82119 8?120 82121 HITECH SYSTEI.IS, INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES IIORIH VALLEY OIL I.i I SC. SUPPLIES PARKIII SECURI TY CONSULTANTS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 209.00 101 64420 210 1,032.00 101 65100 220 82122 CON BROSIIAN I.I I SCELLANEO,JS '1 ,863,00 731 22546 I ,863.00 ACCOUNT ( 5,361.32 12,718.29 116,00 620 66700 120 15712 16126 ( IiUI.IBER NAME ( CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E!]ARRANI REGISTER 04/05 /0? VENDOR DETAILr*rDenotes Hand lrri tten Checks PAGE 2 A}IOUNT 340.00 4,521 .33 89 ,47 369.53 2,191 .30 19,855.05 2, 0'16.00 20 ,140.65 129,181 .80 1,333.00 730.00 7,202,A0 5t2-ta 82095 i'IARY LEE OELEIIAI.ITY CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 82097 DULI},I ADVERTI SI NG INC. PUEL I CATI ONS & ADVERTISING 82098 E!/!IIG IRRTGATION PRooUCTS I SCELtAIIEOtJS 82099 ll.!1. cRAtll6ER, IilC. I.IISC. SUPPLIES 82100 ACCOUNT 310.00 10'1 68010 220 1161 4,521.33 101 61420 150 49.47 10't 68020 192 2200 369.53 101 68020 120 22oO 80 39 101 66210 219 101 66210 226 19,853.05 101 66?40 170 2,016,00 101 68010 220 1340 20,110.65 327 n040 120 129,181.80 '26 69020 171 1,353,00 101 65150 220 730.00 526 690?0 233 42.53 620 66700 130 7,?02.80 320 76350 2?O 512,48 101 65200 110 80.00 101 58010 220 1460 GRANITE ROCK COI4PANY SIDEI'AIK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFACI IIG EXPEIISE 02036 02157 0?218 02261 03054 03175 03197 03353 05378 09048 0 0 56 74 82101 P. G. & E. GAS & ELECTRIC 8?102 SANDRA POBE CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 82103 PUI.IP REPAIR SERVICE CO. MISC. SUPPLIES 82104 SAII FRAIICTSCO BATER DEPT. IIATER PURCI{ASES 82105 IIIFORMATIO}I SERVICES DEPI. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 82105 SEOUOIA AIIALYTICAL LABS ltI scELLA|,tE0US 82107 SNAP ON T@LS SilAtL T@LS ROEERT GOODI.IAX CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 03587 82108 TII,{BERL I IIE TNEE SERVICE, IIIC. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 03760 82109 ALLSTAR FIRE EOUIPI.IEiIT, INC. UNI FORI.IS AND EOUIPi{ENT 03938 821 10 ( 82111 TEST IIIG Ei,IGINEERS, INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 09270 640.00 326 a0320 220 640.00 03535 02033 12.53 80.00 ( NUI{BER NAME 82094 CITY OF BURLINGAI{E},ARRAt.IT REGISTER 04t05/02 ( VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes llard Uritten Checks 0391082086 * BURLI}IGAI{E REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH OFFICE EXPENSE t.I I SC. SUPPLIES UNIfORiIS AND EOUIP}IEI/T co,ft,tult I cAT I or,r s BIDG. & GROUNDS I4AINI. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS TRAVEL & MEETINGS I,IISCELLANEOJS iIISCELLAIIEOUS 82087 * PIPER PAINTING CLAIiIS PAYI.IENTS 82088 64520 604 22545 01 01 01 02 101 101 10'l 101 101 101 '101 101 618 731 101 101 10'l 101 101 526 527 620 110 120 140 160 190 220 240 250 1100 1570 2200 1100 2200 2100 2300 ACCOUNT 68010 68010 68020 68010 68020 68010 68020 68020 PAGE'I AMOUNT 5,472.03 6,800,00 88.01 7 ,739 ,80 511.23 2,301 .67 157.62 1 ,120.39 23569 01027 01030 01100 01637 01663 9.21 29. I .93 I .95 22.33 16.88 '1 .95 6,800.00 618 64520 601 ACE HAROI.IARE I,IISC. SUPPLIES sr{AtL T00Ls UiIIFOR S ANO EAUIPHENT VEHI CLE MAINT. IIISCELLANECI,S I{ I SC. SUPPLIES S}IALL T@LS SUPPLIES 6520 6621 6510 6520 11 30 40 02 65100 703 59020 120 c6520 130 15000 ACT ION CLEANI NG SERVICE EOUI PI{EIIT I.IAI NT. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 8LDG. & GROUNDS I,4AINT. 349.03 6,716.46 674.31 10t 65400 200 619 61160 220 5130 6?1 61450 190 3.90 82089 82090 BRENTON SAtErY, INC. TRAI}II}IG EXPENSE 82091 82093 BURL I NGAI,4E CHAI.IBER OF CO}I},lERCE CHAMBER OF COMI,4ERCE PMT. 82092 BURLI i/GAI,iE RECREATION DEPT. RECREATION EXPENSES 511.23 527 66120 260 2,301.67 101 64530 151 8/+1.00 10'l 't0700 157.62 620 15000 1,120.39 101 6/+400 800 01857 CoRPoRATE EllvtRoNuENTSr tNC., CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENI 01992 GCS gESTERN PO/ER & SUPPLIES 82095 L. N. CURTTS & So|ts UNI FORiIS AND EOUIPTIENT 02027 103.73 101 65200 140 ( 841.00 105.80 898,05 256- 55 288.94 412.70 1 ,487.00 79.95 64,38 122.64 I ,756.02 103.73 03-?9-2002 l,lAltE GENERAT TUIID CAPIIAL II,IPROVEI,IENTS FUND SE!/ER CAPITAL PROJECT TU}ID !/ATER FUIID SEL'ER FUND SOLID !'ASTE FUND GOLF CEIITER FUND SELF INSURAIICE FUND FACILIIIES SERVICES FUIID EOUIPI'IEI'IT SERVICES TU}iD INFOR}IATION SERVICES FUI.ID FIRE I.IECHANIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AND AGENCY FUIID BURLIiIGAI,{E TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRA}I UTILITY REVOLVIIIG FUND TOTAL FOR APPROVAL HOIIORABLE I,IAYOR A D CITY COUNCII.: ( TflIS rS T0 I }ICLUSI VE, THE A}IOU}IT OFFI CIALS, ACCOROANCE RESPECTFULLY SUBI'IITTED, CITY OF BURLINGAMEUARRANI REG I STER FUi/D RECAP - 0'1.02 FUND 't01 320 327 5?6 527 528 529 618 619 620 621 625 731 736 896 ( PAGE 9 AI'IOIJNT 48,563,82 51,615.45 1,620.00 ,868.17 119 ,279.59 26.20 55,969.10 872.71 156.71 710.93 a36,U 513,94 971 .73 721 .00 25.11 180 9 10 23 2 $567,78'1.30 <'<9e?3)Vo\ o V()rD uL 8)011 C.E- 6/Y't D 5Go, Eq3.Bo CERTITY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED OII PAGES }IUMBERED FROI4 l THROUGH 9 AI{D/OR CLAIIIS NUI.IBERED FRO4 81970 THROUGH 82085 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING I I,I OF $567,781.30, I,IAVE BEEII CHECKED IN DETAIL AI,ID APPROVED 8Y THE PROPER ANO IN I,{Y OPINIOII REPRESE}IT FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAI}IST TIIE CITY IN I.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUI,ITS AS IIIDICATED THEREO}.I. TINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYiIENT DATE COUNCIL DATE ( ( NUI.IBER NAME 82071 82076 82078 82081 82082 82084 CITY OF EURLINGAI'IE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER 03/29 /02 VENDOR.*r Denotes Hand tritten Checks PAGE 8 AIiOUNT 40.00 40.00 40.00 128.00 160.00 3,600.00 6,800.00 500.00 500- 00 20,961.15 300.00 1,000.00 1 ,480.00 195.00 OAN I ELLE DELORIO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 82072 cAr{ERo}l Boos CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82073 ER IN !'INTER CONTNACTUAL SERVICES BOB ROEPKE DEPOSIT RETUIIDS 82083 I' CHAEL UOSS CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES JEFF FLOO DEPOSTT REFUNDS CllIEF SUPPLY UII I FORI.IS AIID EOUIP}.IENT CIRSA DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS DETAI L ACCOUNT 40.00 101 68010 2?0 13?2 40.00 101 58010 220 1322 128.00 10't 58010 220 1461 160.00 101 68010 220 1460 3,600,00 618 64520 601 6,800.00 518 64520 601 500.00 731 22525 500.00 nl 2?525 20,964.1' 320 80190 220 300.00 731 ?2520 1,000,00 731 22520 1,480.00 320 80302 220 39,31 101 65200 1/,0 23563 23564 23565 23566 ?3567 23568 23569 23570 23571 23572 23573 23574 23575 ?3576 82075 DIANE CAUGHLA}I COIITRACTUAL SERVICES NOR}IAI{ HARRIS CLAII.IS PAYI{ENTS 82ON PIPER PRI}ITtNG CO. CLAIt.IS PAYT.IENTS SCOTT UITH I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS 82ON ASHLEY I,ICNEELY I{ISCELLAIIEOUS 82085 TOTAL 23577 195,00 527 66t20 240 $567 ,781 ,30 8?071 KAREN SCIIEI KOI/ITZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 101 68010 220 1322 (( 82080 UNION ELECTRI C COI,ISTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ( NUT1EER NAI.IE 82055 82063 82069 ( CI TY OT BURLIIIGAI.|E!,4 R N A N T R E G I S T E R 03/29t02 VENDOR O€TAILr*r Denotes HaM lrritten Checks PAGE 7 AMOUIIT 317.09 4,700.00 '1 ,056.00 190.00 1,763.65 67 ,53 1,000.00 1 ,239 .52 258.00 195.00 2,357.69 45,00 45.00 40.00 40.00 23021 82056 HEI,IDERSOII E}IGINEERING CONSULTAT.II 23058 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 82057 IiIER I I RESruRCE GROUP TEI.{PORARY EiIPLOYI4ENT SVC. 23076 82058 THE IIOBILE S]ORAGE GRq',P RENTS & LEASES 23'138 82059 IIIG LEGALS PUBLICAT IONS & ADVERTISING OFFICE DEPOT OFTICE EXPE}ISE CAPITAL EAUIPI.4ENT 82061 SECURI TY SOLUTIOIIS CO}ITRACTUAL SERVTCES 8205? RON LTTTLE ]RAVEL & I.IEETI}IGS ACC0UUT 347.09 101 64200 150 4,700.00 320 75110 210 1,056.00 101 64120 011 23153 82060 UN IVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC, t.{ I SC. SUPPLIES 23311 800 963 101 68010 110 1100 101 680'10 800 1'100 29 36 AII.I I}ITERI/ET I1ARKETING CO}ITRACTUAI. SERVICES 82064 AERC.Coi.I MISC. SUPPLIES 82065 GOLDEN STREET PRINTIXG I.1I SCELLAI'IEOUS 82066 ROBERT }.IORTENSE}I COHTRACTUAL SERVICES 82067 JESSICA Gq'LET CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 67.53 619 64460 120 5150 1.000.00 320 80430 220 1,239,52 101 68010 250 lloo 258.00 101 68010 220 1450 495.00 619 64460 120 5120 2,357,69 731 22543 45.00 101 58010 220 1322 45.00 101 68010 220 1322 40,00 101 58010 220 1322 10,00 101 68010 220 1322 BIANCA GUI T I ERREZ COiITRACTUAL SERVICES 23112 23161 23501 23523 23545 23558 ?3559 ?3560 ?3561 82070 MIKE TI FO CONTRACIUAL SERVICES 23562 i+0.00 101 68010 220 1322 40,00 ( 190.00 526 69020 180 82058 CLAUDIA }IERCADO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ( I,JUI,48ER NAI.IE 82051 CI TY OF BURLINGAIIEI./ARRANI REGISTER 03/29 /0? VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes HsM f.itten Checks PAGE 6 AMOUNT 10, 128.48 80.00 1,150.00 8,254.11 1,620.00 5,000,00 9 ,393.15 617 .50 170.00 13,320,00 2n .22 4,593.68 320.00 82040 VB GOLF LLC ISCELLAITEOUS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES RECREATION PROGRAI.I EXPEIISE 8,259 .92 317.76 1,550.80 529 36717 529 68030 120 529 68030 213 82043 AT&T UTI LtTY EXPENSE UNDERGRO{JND CONSTRUCT ION I.IANAGER 22305 PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 82042 EXPRESS PTUI'IBING DEPOSIT REFUNDS GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 82044 82045 820t 6 82049 ROBERTA TAVAff CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82050 22138 JCC , I[C. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S ?2117 ACCOUNT 80.00 101 68020 200 2200 1,150.00 731 22520 76.51 896 20281 8,254.11 527 66520 210 1,620,00 327 78531 210 t,000.00 731 ?2520 9,393.15 101 66210 223 617,50 320 80302 220 170.00 101 68010 220 1161 13,320,00 526 69020 210 4,r93.6a 101 64420 260 320.00 101 58010 220 1341 21918 ?2070 22092 22501 22634 22657 ?2672 22676 22682 ?2821 HELM IG COIISTRUCTION DEPOSIT RETUNDS 82047 AN?,. ENGTNEERING DITCII & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN 82048 J II,4 DELIA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TURF STAR EOUIPI4ENT MAIX]. EAUI PiIE}IT MAINT. 27.a9 249.33 101 68020 200 2200 529 68030 200 4200 82052 GLASER AND ASSOCIAIES TRAIIIII{G EXPE}ISE 82053 ROBERTA RESTAI.II CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ( 42054 I/ES TREIICH SHORING CAPITAL EOUTP}IENT 23007 2,695.43 527 66520 800 2,695 .13 ( 82041 SARIoR SAt/ !/ORKS EOUIPMENT I{AINT. 76,54 ( UI,48ER NAI.IE 82026 42029 CITY OF BURLINGAMEI{ARRANT REGISTER 03/29 /02 ACCOUNT PAGE 5 AMOUI.]T 198.67 110.51 435.12 2 ,097 ,98 1 ,099.95 356.95 265 .68 5.026.00 123.83 525.00 23.44 820.92 GE CAPI TAL OFTICE EXPEIISE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 82027 AT&T L/IRELESS c(},0{ull I cAT I0N S Cofil'luN t cAT I 0[ S VENOOR DETAIL '*r Denotes Hand l,/ritten Checks 20216 20301 73 91 101 68020 110 2100 10t 68010 220 1100 104,14 26.?0 '101 66100 160 736 64571 160 99 398 82030 IATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRA SFER, IN 2,1107 TRAVEL & MEETII]GS SPRI IIT PCS COI.I}IUN I CAT IONS UTI I.I TY EXPENSE 82031 oulcK Htx collcRETE SIDEI.IALK REPAIR EXPEIISE 82035 PORTOSAN RENTS & LEASES 181.00 1,913.98 527 66520 160 896 ?02A1 1\5,12 620 15000 1,099.95 619 61160 ?50 356,95 101 66210 219 265.68 101 61350 120 82032 cE8 ,.I I SC. SUPPLIES 82033 D G [AXrr{Us MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8?034 cDt/ GoVERNI|ENT, INC. EOUIPI'IE}IT I,iAIIIT. 82035 2 2 101 33900 101 64250 210 20464 21110 21210 21268 21482 21500 21656 21675 175.00 175.00 175.00 00 00 276 750 101 66?10 260 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 82037 I'IISSIOII VALLEY FORD SUPPLI ES 82038 82039 PROVIDENCE PEST TERI.IITE PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S CoRPoRATE EXPRESS 0F THE HEST, r 21819 OFFICE EXPEIISE 175.07 529 68030 180 4/+oo ?3.11 620 15000 820.92 101 61250 110 ( 21947 40.00 619 64460 210 5170 40.00 ( 175.07 82028 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. SUPPLIES 123.83 320 80420 200 20721 ROCKHURST COLLEGE TRAINII.IG EXPE},ISE TRAII,IIi]G EXPEI,ISE TRAINI NG EXPENSE ( IIUMEER NAI.IE ( CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGI STER 03/29 t02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks PAGE 4 AMOUNT 67 .98 1,680.00 5,101.14 1 t220.4O 693.62 91.60 129.77 340.00 171 .O5 518.93 2,701.35 203.01 12,aM,65 5,699.00 SIERRA I.IOREIIO MERCAIITILE CO. 18357 SI4ALL T@LS 82012 III LLS-PEII INSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 }IISCELLANEOUS 82013 DEPAR]I,|ENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRTPTIO}IS 18635 82014 LABOR READY, tNC. TEMPORARY EI.IPLOYI,IEIIT SVC. 18659 82015 BAY ALARI.I EOUIPI.IENT I.IA I IIT. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18854 82016 CALIFORITIA CHAiIBER OF COI,{I,IERCE PUBIICAIIOI,IS & ADVERTISING 18893 82017 ACCESS UI.II FOR}IS & EiIBROIDERY UXI FORI.IS AIID EOUIPTIEIIT 18990 ACCOU},JT 67.98 101 68020 !3o 23oo 1,680.00 101 64420 03,1 5,101.1/+ 526 690?0 210 1,220.40 5?6 69020 O,t 1 91,60 101 644?0 150 129,77 527 66520 140 310.00 101 68010 220 1161 155.25 538.37 10't 65400 200 619 64460 210 5180 82018 PEGGY GUARALDI COI{TRACTUAL SERVTCES 19044 82019 A}IG NEUSPAPERS I,I I SC. SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19083 82020 ItI NOLTA BUSII,IESS SYSTEiIS EOUIPI{E}IT i,IAI NT. 19131 82021 IMAGEi'{AX, INC. IlI SCETLANEOUS 19145 82022 BLACX I4OUNIAI N SPRING I,IATER I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 19330 518.93 101 65200 2oo 2,701.35 731 22518 203.01 101 66210 120 12,414.65 320 760,10 210 5,599.00 320 78290 210 169.20 I .85 320 79100 120 320 80510 220 42023 82021 82025 SIG}IET TESTIIIG LABS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S UILSEY & HAM PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 19367 19397 251.66 251.67 251.67 ( PENII,ISULA CORRIDOR RENTS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES REIITS & LEASES JOINT 20060 101 66210 180 526 69020 180 527 66120 180 3,755.00 82011 ( i.JUI4BER IIAI{E 81996 ELECTRO-i,IOTION IIICORPORAIED PUI.IP EOUI P}IE}IT REPAI R PUI.IP EOUIPiIENT REPAIR 81997 ROYAL }IHOLESALE ELECTRIC I,4I SC. SUPPLIES 81998 CITY OF BURLINGAUE!,ARRANl REGISTER 03t29 /02 VENDOR '*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks DETAI L 11007 14855 (( BOREL/POPLAR DEVELOPTIEIII I{ISCELLANEq,,S 5?6 69020 230 527 665?0 230 526 69020 '110 527 66520 120 619 64460 110 1 ,190,75 1 ,190.75 ACCOUNT PA6E 3 Al'louNT 2 ,381 .50 1 ,212.06 360.00 1 ,7?1 .00 71.55 2,698.39 1 ,640.00 111.24 83.02 1 ,164.80 1 ,237.00 717.06 25.11 252.33 15196 81999 SPECIALIZED CO}.,IMUNICATIOIIS COIIIMUN I CAT I O}I S 157a7 82OOO I.IOSS RUBBER & EOUIP}IENT CORP. TRAINTNG EXPEXSE 16225 82001 JUDY PISAIIO CONTRACTUAT SERVICES SUPERI OR ALUMINUU BODY CORP. I,4 I SCE L LAIIEOUS 82002 LINDA HOECK CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 1,212.06 101 66240 120 350.00 101 68010 220 1450 1,721.00 521 61150 160 2,698,39 618 61520 60l 1,640,00 101 68010 220 1346 111.21 '101 65200 20t 85.02 '101 68020 ,l9o 22oo 1,'f 64,80 526 36730 1,237.00 101 66210 226 I4ETRO r.r0B I LE Co [Ut{ t CAT I OtiS RADI0 I'lAI tlT, 82004 PRIOE PAIIiT 8tDG, & GROUNDS ilAINT. 8200J 82005 82006 82007 16229 16390 17402 17411 17497 17546 17568 120,16 139.13 157.n 17450 ROI.II C ENVI RONI1EIITAL STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE 17153 COLORPRI NT DIGITAT OFF I CE EXPEIISE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES OIFICE EXPENSE 82008 H I -TEC}I EI.IERGENCY VEHICLE FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI ilT. 82009 LEE & ASSOCIAIES EOUI PI4E}IT I,{AIIIT. 25.11 625 55213 203 252,33 101 65200 2oO 82010 ROBY}I iIC}IAUARA COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 17588 508.80 10'l 68010 220 1161 508.80 71.55 527 66520 260 ( }JUMBER iIAI.IE CITY OT BURLINGAIIEIJARRAIIT REGISTER 03/29/02 VENDOR DEIAIL '*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks 0308081982 PACIFIC BELL COMMUNTCAT IONS UTI L ITY EXPENSE 81983 STEPIIEN J. PI CCHI COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 81984 SAII IIATEO COUIITY CONVENTIOII & MISCELLA}IEqJS 81985 LEE EUFFINGTON TAX COLLECTOR PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZED S ACCOTJNT PAGE 2 Ai.touflT 1 ,409.64 640.00 135,770.55 1 ,100.r1 71.29 429.00 292,21 5,644.73 857.35 10,738.4' 800.00 40.00 2,026.82 640.00 101 68010 220 ,t572 135,7t0.55 731 225A7 71.29 520 55700 130 I ,378.93 430.71 101 55100,160 496 202A1 101 66210 210 526 69020 210 527 66520 710 81986 SNAP 0|t TOOLS SMALL T@LS 8't987 PACI C !/EST SECUR I TY, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S PROFESSIOI{AL & SPECtAt I ZED S 81988 [,EST GROJP PAY}IENT CTR. PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 03168 05/13'1 03465 03587 03601 03961 't43.00 143.00 143.00 81989 CALLA}IDERASSOCTATES PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI.IZED S 292,21 101 64550 210 5,544.73 320 71171 210 857.35 'tor 66100 210 10,738.45 618 64120 225 800,00 101 68010 220 1462 /,0.00 101 65200 202 81990 ocE. -BRUNING, IXC. PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S 09193 8'1991 AEAG - LIABTIITY CLAII.iS ADJUST!NG SERVICES 09518 81992 BERNARD ED!'ARDS CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES 09548 81993 SHATIER I S AUTO SERVICE CEIITER VEH ICLE I.IAI NT. 11121 81994 09161 11568 20.56 515.19 50.00 31.93 I ,598.84 CHIET BI LL REILLY OFFICE EXPEIISE }IISC. SUPPLIES UNI TORI.IS AND EOUIPI.IENT FIRE APPARATUS I.IAINT. IRAIIIING EXPENSE 101 65200 110 101 65200 120 101 55200 140 101 65200 203 101 61200 260 8199t AT&T UTILITY EXPE},ISE 13940 217.29 896 20281 217.29 (( 1,400.54 320 76010 ?10 ( NUI.IBER I{AI{E ( CITY OT BURLINGAI,IEI/ARRANl REGISTER 03/29 t02 01400 02184 0224a 0?261 02365 PAGE'I A OU T I ,615, 't0 328.45 745.00 438.88 166, '130.00 1 ,313.86 5,673.50 6?.89 9?5 .96 9,156,71 133.73 49 ,328,66 36.00 't5.30 11.59 13.31 I ,631.67 13.30 't3.30 47,657.08 81970 I,JII I TE CAP SIDE!/ALK REPAIR EXPEI,ISE SI.IALL TOOLS 807 807 101 66210 219 526 69020 130 170.40 158.05 526 69020 260 529 68030 ?60 1200 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes HaM Uritten Checks 01250 ACCOJNT 745.00 101 10700 438.88 620 15000 165,150.00 527 66530 220 101 68020 120 2300 101 68020 192 2200 5,673.50 896 20282 81972 BURLINGAME RECREAT ION DEPT. RECREATIOI'I EXPE}ISES 81973 01857 81974 US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES COI{TRACTUAL SERVICES 021 10 81975 02157 81976 81971 BRENTOil SATETY, rNC. TRAINIiIG EXPENSE TRAINING EXPE}ISE GCS !'ESTERX PO/ER & SUPPL IES L/ATER/FI}IANCE PETTY CASH I.I I SCELLAIIEOUS 81977 !i, Lt. GRAINGER, mC, s[ALt T@LS VEHI CLE }tAINT. iI I SC. SUPPLIES 81978 GRAIITTE ROCK CO{PA}IY SIDETIALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFACIi/G EXPENSE 81979 HARDING ESE, INC. PROFESSIOiIAI & SPECTALIZED S EgING IRRIGATIOII PROOUCTSItsc, SUPPLtES I.IISCELLANEOUS 908.39 405.47 '101 55200 130 101 65200 202 619 64460 120 5130 81980 K & !1 DISCCT',NT LTGHTI}IG & SUPP MISC. SUPPLIES 02645 81981 03054 162.98 462.98 101 66?10 219 101 66210 226 9,156,71 528 66600 210 P, C. & E- GAS & EIECTRtC },IISCELLA}IEOUS GAS & ELECTRIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTITITY EXPENSE 101 66210 170 101 66210 172 526 69020 170 527 66520 170 896 20280 ( 01653 133,73 619 61460 120 5120 (( 03-22-2002 NAIIE GEIIERAL TUND CAPTTAL I}IPROVEMENTS FUND SEIJER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND !,ATER FUI,ID SEI.IER TUND GOLF CENTER FU}ID SELF INSURANCE FUiID FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUIPI.IEI{T SERVICES FUIID INFORMATIOII SERVICES FU}.ID FIRE I.4ECHAIIIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AIIO AGEIICY TUND BURLINGAI,IE TRAIN SHUITLE PROGRAI{ UTILITY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL FOR APPROVAL CITY OF BURLINGAI,IEI.IARRANT REGISTER FUNO RECAP . 01-02 ,817 ,194 FUIID '101 320 327 526 527 529 618 619 620 621 625 731 736 896 PAGE 10 7?,711.45 194,719,01 56 8,055 1t3 41 ,150 1 ,065 788 25,083 16 41 ,269 14,432 7,611 107,91 50 11 36 65 47 01 95 95 80 56 66 07 $521, l8z or:; vatD o.,K- 8t4;1 3do/1es . IiO}IORAELE I.{AYOR AI.|D CITY COt',TCIL: Tl]IS IS TO CERTIfY THAT TIIE CLAII,IS LISTED ON PAGES NUI,IBERED IRO,I 1 THROUGH IOINcLUslvE, AND/OR clAtl'ls llul'IBERED FRo'4 81856 TliRouctt 81969 tHcLUstvE,TorALrNG tNIMrylT oF $521 ,i07 .91 , lrAvE BEEN cHEcKED lir DETATL ArD rppiovii sv THE pRopER oFFICTALS, AND tN r,{y oprNIoN REPRESENT tArR AND JUST cmncei aCriHir THE ctry INAccoRDANcE glTH THEIR RESpEcTIvE ArloJNTs As norcrreo rxeiior. '''- RESPECTFULLY SUBiIITTED, FIIIANCE D IRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEI,IT DA]E ( CCI,JNC I L DATE AHOUNT ( }IUI{BER I/AI.IE 81962 [Rs SUPPL IES 81953 LIEBERT GLOBAL SERVICES CITY HALL I4AINTEI,IANCE 81961 CITY OT BURLINGAMEUARRAt,IT REGISTER 03/22/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r oenotes fiard lrritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 160.85 101 65200 112 500.00 621 644s0 200 00 00 101 36310 731 22520 TONY PONTERIO III SCELLANEOUS DEPOSIT REFUNOS 300 PAGE 9 AI'IOUNT 600.00 335.00 2,962.00 210.00 450.00 150.00 4.92 $521,107.91 23553 81966 coRDoil or,,tTJoy Assoc. INc. I.{ISCELLANEOUS BAi/K OF NE}' YORK BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 81967 t{tcNAEL StIVA TRAINING EXPE}ISE 81968 KIRSTEN I.ICLEAN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81965 81969 ISABELLA BOYER }II SCETLANEOUS TOTAT 2,962.00 527 66530 763 210.00 101 36600 450.00 101 65200 250 160.00 101 68010 220 1344 4.92 526 22502 23550 23551 2355? 23555 23556 23157 ( 160.85 (( NUMEER iIAlIE CI TY OF BURLINGAME!/ARRAIIT REGISTER 03t22t02 VENDORr*' Denotes H€rd l,rritten Checks DETAI L ACCOUNT 27,500-00 320 76010 120 881.48 10,1 65100 140 '1,658.00 101 68010 2OO 1585 96.00 619 64460 210 5180 14,081.25 618 61520 210 PAGE 8 AI'IOIJNT 27,500.00 881 .18 1 ,658.00 96.00 14,081.25 1 ,060.00 1,250.00 48.98 182.00 156.35 1 ,5n.15 545.60 1,000.00 57 ,847 .50 155,00 81946 MARSTE}I STREET PARTNERS I,IISC. SUPPLIES 22895 81917 PENTNSULA U ITORi{ & EOUIP ENT U},I I FORI4S AND EOUIPXEI{T 22899 81918 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING EOUIPI.IEIIT itAINT. 22931 81919 81950 8195'1 81955 81956 81917 81958 }/ESTER}i EXTERI.,IINATOR COIIPAilY PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALI ZED S ROPERS I IAJESK I , KOHN & BENTLEY PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALTzED S 23001 23019 PITi/EY BO!'ES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OFFI CE EXPENSE 81952 l,tAzE & AssoctATEs CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 512.00 548.00 101 65100 220 621 61450 110 ?31?8 23178 23253 23366 23410 ?3136 23480 23546 23547 23548 81953 DTRECTV co,4 uil I CAT I0[ s 81954 SAN FRAi,JCISCO EXAI.|INER I.4I SC. SUPPLIES 1,250.00 101 64560 220 48.98 526 69020 160 182.00 101 64420 1?O 156.35 101 64200 110 1,573.1' 621 61450 ?OO 545.60 101 64420 ?10 '1,000.00 731 22543 57 ,817.50 327 78536 ?20 155,00 618 U.520 234 DATASAFE OFFI CE EXPENSE CANOII FIIIANCIAL SERVI CES, INC. CITY HALL I,IAI IITE}iAIiCE LEGALINK LOS ANGELES PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S JANICE !/OLFE }.II SCELLA}IEOUS 81959 EPS, I |,1C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MI LLS PEIIINSULA EHERGENCY MED,IN iII SCELLANEOUS 81960 81961 J.A.t.I. PLASTICS, INC. OFFICE EXPEIiSE 23549 19?.99 101 64420 110 192.99 It ( NUI.|BER }IAi{E 81931 CITY OF EURLII,IGAME!,ARRANT REGTSTER 03t22/02 ( ACC0UIT PAGE 7 AI,{OUNT 536.24 3.311.16 895.31 962.50 11,840.00 80.00 977.25 151.30 11,132.66 59.01 415 .68 520.00 330.00 150.00 CINGULAR !/IRELESS cotrllluN I cAT I 0t{ S co ltultIcAT r0Ns EILEEN P. GOTDENBERG CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE, GAS. OIL & GREASE AUTO PRIDE CAR UASH VE}I ICLE I.IA I N]. FIRE APPARATUS }IAI}II. 81944 CARL DEOUAIIT DEPOSI T REFUTJDS VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tl6nd }/ritten Checks 21747 21767 44 80 101 66100't60 526 69020 160 869. 15 108. 10 101 65100 202 101 55200 203 81932 TURBO DATA SYSTEI4S, r|,tc. I.I I SCELLANEOUS 81933 c0L0R coPY PRINTIIG, INC. I.II SC. SUPPLTES 460 75 81931 81935 81936 81937 ?1846 SA}.I MATEO COUNTY COI,ITROI.LERS OFF 21897 I,IISCELLANEOUS 5,311.16 101 37OlO 896,31 101 55300 120 11,840.00 10t 37olo 80.00 101 65200 201 2?008 22278 22812 81938 TlID.AI'IERICAN SPECTALTIES I.I I SC, SUPPTIES 22178 81939 PARKING COI{PANY OF AI.IER I CA COIIIRACTUAL SERVICES 22500 81940 TENNATT I,II SC. SUPPLIES 22621 81941 J It,( KELLY TRAVEL & IIEETIIIGS 22703 81912 SAII MATEO REGIONAL NET!/ORK, INC. 22759 UTILIIY EXPENSE 81913 VALI COOPER AIID ASSOCIATES, INC. 228,13 PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZEO S 151.30 101 65200 120 14,432.66 736 64570 220 59,0'f 101 66210 120 415.68 101 66100 250 520.00 896 20281 150.00 731 22520 81945 JENKI NS,/ATHENS IIIS CLAIiIS ADJUSTING SERVICES 16,4U.00 ( 21831 962.50 101 68010 220 1316 330.00 320 76110 210 16,184.00 618 645?0 ?25 ( 819't8 K-lt9 oF cALTFORNTA, rNC. SIIALL TOOLS NUHBER NAI.{E 81917 COUNTY OF SA}I MATEO I,4I SC. SUPPLIES OI{ CAI4ERA PRODUCTIONS PROFESSIONAL & SPECTAL IZED S U}IITY BUSI}IESS SERVICE EOUIPXENT I,iAINI. 81923 CDU GOVERXiIENT, INC. EOUI P}IEIIT I,iAINT. 81924 CITY OT BURLINGAIIELIARRANT REGISTER 03t22/O? VENDORr*r Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks DETAI L 20548 ACCOUNT 464.52 lot 68010 120 1320 65.36 527 66520 130 511.21 101 66210 219 35,690.27 731 22590 995.00 101 64560 210 1,08t.t0 10't 65300 200 &.70 3?0 80120 200 67.50 101 68010 220 1160 308.95 527 66520 260 20924 21140 211n 21364 21482 21497 21500 21613 INC.21631 21680 PAGE 6 A14OUNT 461.52 65.36 sl1.21 35,690.?7 995.00 1,081.50 61.70 67.50 2,565.00 300.00 1 ,257.14 134.17 81919 outc( tirx coNcRETE SIDEUALK REPAIR EXPENSE 81920 81921 81922 ESA ENVI RO},IiIENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 DEPOSIT REFUND OU-ALL SAFETY IRAINI NG EXPE}ISE TRAIN I NG EXPEI/SE TRAI}IING EXPENSE 81927 OXTCA EHLERS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GEORGE t,'H I TE COI,/TRACTUAt SERVICES 81925 ROCKHURSTCOLI.EGE TRAINI}IG EXPE}ISE 41925 81928 81929 026 769 769 101 66210 260 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 00 50 50 ARAI4ARK UII I FORI,4 UN I FORMS AND U}I I FORI{S A}ID UNI FORHS AND UNI FORIIIS AND UNI FORI.IS AND sEnvt cEs, EAUI PMENT EOU I PI'IE II T EOUI PI'IENT EOUIPMENI EOUIPMEIIT 't01 662't0 140 526 69020 110 527 66520 110 619 64460 110 620 66700 110 HESTER HI GHT'AY PROOUCTS, INC. SIDEI'ALK REPAIR EXPE}ISE 300.00 101 68010 220 1461 391 .21 550.53 352.88 97.78 64.61 431.17 101 66210 219 81930 LISA COFFARO COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES ?1713 320.00 101 58010 220 1231 320.00 (( 21627 308.95 (( CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGISTER 03/22/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks PAGE 5 AI,4OUNT 17.05 949.20 285.60 45.00 2,238.41 696.97 350.00 3,815.80 550.00 142.67 3,652.00 526.21 80.00 18rJ3 81903 CALIFORNIA CHAiIBER OF COI.4MERCE DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS 18893 BAILEYIS TNAINING EXPENSE 81904 ANG IIEUSPAPERS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES PUEL I CATIONS & ADVERIISING ACCOUIT 215.08 101 64420 240 NU}.IBER IIAI'IE 81902 81905 301.20 648.00 101 64400 120 101 64200 150 LIEBERT CASSIDY !/H I II.IORE PROFESSIONAL & SPECTAL I ZEO S 81906 ri/tAGEl.tAx, lNc. I,I I SCELLANEOTJS 81907 OUALITY AIR MI SCELLANEOUS 2,238.41 731 22582 19083 19145 19193 19366 19502 19564 19710 19990 20060 ?0?16 20216 81909 81910 819',t1 81908 EURTOII'S FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. FIRE APPARATUS I,{AI NI. 680.17 16,80 101 65200 203 625 65213 ?03 T0t1 A!,{ES TRAINI}IG EXPE}ISE PO!'ER L/ASHIN6 SERVI CE PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ALL FENCE CO|4PANY, I r,tc. BLDG. & GRCT,NDS iIAINT. 81912 UTILITY AERIAL INC EOUIPI.IENT AINI. 81913 350.00 101 65200 260 3,8'15.80 101 66210 210 350.00 101 66210 190 142.67 10't 68020 200 2300 3,652.00 320 78290 220 80.00 621 64450 160 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOITIT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81911 GE CAPITAL CITY HALL }lAINTENAIICE 81915 AFTINIIEL COI.IUUN I CAl I ONS coili.{uil I cAT r oN s 81916 STATE OT CAL I FORNIA LOAN PRINCIPAL PAYMEIIT IIiTEREST PAYI.tE}IT ?0250 32,591 .47 11 ,167.88 526 69020 761 526 690?0 762 43,759.35 ( 17.05 l0l 68020 260 23oO 19095 215.08 285.60 101 64350 210 45.00 731 22518 526.24 621 64150 200 (( CITY OF BURLINGAiIEIJARRANT REGISTER 03/22/02 VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand frritten Checks PAGE 4 81890 IIITERSTATE BAITERY SYSTEI.{ FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT. 81891 BOETHING TREELA}ID FARI,IS, INC. }IISCELLANECT',S 81892 DE!'EY PEST CO}.ITROL IIEED ABATETIENT PROGRAM 81893 RADIO SHACK EOUI PI.IENT t.IA I NT. POTICE Ii]VEST IGAT I ON EXPENSE RECHARGEIEM OFFICE EXPENSE ROYAT gfiOLESALE ELECTRIC I'! I SC. SUPPLIES PUI.IP EOUI P}IENT REPAIR I,I I SC. SUPPLIES TRESSERIS TOI.I SERVICE M!SCELLANEOUS 81896 PEIITNSULA ASA I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 71.6? 101 65200 203 702.43 731 22560 100.00 527 66520 221 54.13 10't 65200 110 NUIIBER NAI,IE 81889 81894 81895 81897 81898 8't 899 8',I900 11749 '13689 14338 11523 '1l.855 15513 15739 16575 1710? 21,63 79.00 8',1 .19 1 ,091 .16 98,51 '101 65400 200 '101 65100 292 '101 66210 120 526 69020 230 619 &460 120 5150 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 100.65 77.62 702.43 100.00 1,270.86 30.00 504.00 399.48 165.00 261 .25 1,742.68 I{I LLBRAE LOCI( SIIOP I.IISC. SUPPLTES VEH ICLE XAINT. I'I I SC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 245.66 31.?1 67.16 52.15 101 68020 120 2200 101 65200 202 619 61460 1?O 5130 620 15000 504.00 101 68010 120 1587 165.00 10',1 66210 210 261.?5 10'1 680'10 220 1100 CO.I}.IUII I TY GATEPATH PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S HD INOUSTRIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES METRO I.IOB I LE COI.IMUN I CAT I ONS EOUIPiIEIIT MAIX]. RADIO I.{AI }IT. 873.47 469.21 't0't 65',t50 200 101 65200 205 24 56 227 522 81901 STANDARD REGISTER OFFI CE EXPEiISE CITY HALL I.IAI XTENA}ICE 17495 101 6/1250 '110 621 &150 200 2,719.80 ( 54,13 15701 30.00 618 61520 604 17106 ( CITY OF BURLINGAT1EI'ARRAN' REGISTER 03/22/02 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 3,030.87 9,400.97 1 ,516.62 345 .72 160,00 225 -OO 610,11 181.12. 979.25 I./U}.I8ER TIAME 81879 BURLINGAI4E REC. DEPT./PETTY CASII OFTICE EXPENSE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES U}I I FORI{S AIID EQIJIPI.IE}IT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRI PT IONS TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S MISCELLAIIEOUS 81880 ABAG . LTABI LITY PROFESSIONAL & SPECIATIZED S 81881 81882 VEI,IDOR DETAILrir oenotes Hand Lrritten Checks 03910 09518 10'1 101 10t 101 101 101 320 731 68010 68020 68020 68010 58010 68020 80140 22534 68020 68020 66210 68020 69020 66520 68030 68030 64460 110 120 110 2?0 240 250 210 1 101 2300 2100 1314 1100 2300 9,400.97 618 64520 210 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDIIARE OfTICE EXPENSE IlI SC. SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS BLDG. & GR(IJIDS A I iIT. I,I I SC. SUPPLIES SI{ALL TOOLS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES stl LL T00LS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 2200 2200 2200 4200 2200 09670 09720 09975 10101 10557 t 5. '13 244.10 19 .47 127 .A1 398.38 101 101 10'1 '101 526 527 529 529 619 24.89 27.04 126.61 213 .19 1',t0 120 130 190 120 130 120 130 120 SEAUOIA UII I ON HIGH SCIIOOL OFTICE EXPENSE 8,1883 ANA FITZGERALD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81884 DARYL D. JO ES, tNC. COIITRACTUAT SERVICES 81885 cAL-STEAI{ SMAIL TOOLS TRATT I C COIITROL T.IATERIALS I.i I SC. SUPPLIES I.II SC. SUPPLIES 315,72 101 68010 110 t,to0 160.00 101 58010 220 1342 225.00 101 65200 ?20 17.05 41.47 144.01 137 .55 101 66210 130 101 66210 222 526 69020 120 527 66520 120 81886 PIP PRII,iTING I,I I SCELLAiIEOUS 10620 81887 IOEAL RESTORATTVE DRYI}IG, INC. CLAII'S PAYI4EIITS 11352 484.42 101 54400 115 9n.25 618 645?0 601 81888 scltltA 8, Ilic. OFFI CE EXPENSE 1 168/+ 88.85 101 64250 110 88.85 (( 460.26 935.59 86.58 267.00 260.00 180.45 12.75 828,24 PAGE 5 (C 81866 HASELEACH SURVEYING INSTRUI,{EI,IT 02410 I'IISCELLA}IECi.JS EXPENSE 81867 K & I' DISCOTJNT LTGHTING & SUPP I.I I SC. SUPPLTES 02645 ACC0U T 59.51 526 69020 290 267.05 619 64460 120 5120 NUI"IBER }IA''IE 81868 LA!/SON PRODUCTS, INC. I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 81870 81875 SEOUOIA ANALYT ICAL LABS [IISCELLANEOUS SKYLIITE SUPPLY C0., lNc. OTFICE EXPEIISE MISC. SUPPLIES OfFICE EXPENSE '.IISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE OTFICE EXPENSE CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IElIARRANT REGISTER 03/22t02 VENDOR DETAI L.*r Denotes Hand llritteh checks 02898 03054 03080 03175 03197 03518 03536 03574 03760 942.8? 34. 10 1 ,177 .E 9.52 '1 '13.50 PA6E 2 59.51 ?67 .0' 460.68 777 .71 9 tA14,69 7,091.07 56/..00 3,024.00 244 .37 2,100.00 2,277.99 7 ,9AA.56 81869 I.II LLBRAE LUMEER CO. }IISC. SUPPTIES SIOEUALK REPAIR EXPEXSE iIISC. SUPPLIES 270.79 189,89 526 69020 120 520 15000 101 66210 120 101 66210 219 526 690?0 120 080 721 10 101 ([210 173 526 69020 170 527 665?0 170 11 32 23 I 5 P. 6. & E. !,t t scELLA EolrS GAS & ELECTRIC GAS & EIECTRIC 81871 PACI FtC BELL UTILIIY EXPENSE 81872 SANDRA POBE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RANDY SCHUARTZ I.,I I SCEI.LANEOUS 81AB PUI.IP REPATR SERVICE CO. PUiIP EOUI P}IENT REPAIR 81874 7,091,07 896 20281 564.00 101 68010 220 1340 3,024.00 527 66520 230 2&.37 101 58010 051 2,100.00 526 69020 233 101 54250 110 101 66100 120 526 69020 110 526 69020 290 619 64460 ',t10 81A77 81878 TIUBERL IIiE TREE SERVICE, INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES U S POSTAL SERVICE I.I I SCELLAiIEOUS 7,9W.56 tol 68020 220 23oO 03821 3,000.00 101 64250 114 3,000.00 ( 02755 AI.IOUNT 234.21 406.02 137 .48 81876 ( CITY OF BURLINGAIIEL'ARRANT REGISTER 03/22/02 ACCOUNT PAGE 1 AIITOUNT 7,094.30 780.00 71,98 150,359.56 576.00 375.00 416.18 33,034.00 81856 * BURLINGAI.IE POLICE DEPT OTFICE EXPENSE iIISC. SUPPLIES POL I CE- -SUPPLIES UNI FORI4S AIID EOUIPIIE}IT CON,IMUN I CATIONS BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAINT. EOUIPI.IEII] IlAI }IT. PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TRAVEL & MEETINGS TRAI}IING EXPENSE PRI SOI/ER EXPENSE POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAT EOUIPI,4ENT I.I I SCELLANEOUS NUMBER ilAl'lE 81857 * GARY irtSSEL TRAIN I NG EXPENSE 81858 ALPnTE A!/ARDS, Ilrc. TRAIIIING EXPENSE 81859 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. SUPPLIES 81860 G, BORTOLOTTO & CO., INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81861 CITY OF 8UR L I I,IGAI,IE 11I SC. SUPPLIES 81862 LEAGUE OT CAI- I TORN IA CITIES TRAVEL & I,4EETII,|GS 81863 GCS IESTERN POTJER & SUPPLIES 81864 !r. r,l. GRAINGER, IXC. I,IISC. SUPPLIES TRAINING EXPENSE VENDORr*r Denotes llahd lrritten Checks DETAI L 13720 988.20 129.a4 218.52 550.31 67,17 313.48 1 ,541.02 3.01 1 ,542.55 1s5.00 3n .55 315.21 216n 341 .88 24.00 72.00 151 .56 '101 '10'l 101 101 10'1 10'l 101 l0t t0l l0'l 101 101 101 101 101 731 65100 65400 65100 55150 65100 65100 55100 65't00 65100 65100 65100 55100 65100 65100 65100 22574 110 120 126 140 160 190 200 210 240 250 260 291 292 703 800 CITY OF REDUOOO CITY EOUIPIIEN] },IAI NT. CONTRAC]UAI SERVICES cQl u[IcAT IoilS CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 320 80420 200 320 801',10 220 621 61150 160 621 61450 220 01052 01059 01358 016?4 0174' 01857 01862 780,00 101 65100 260 71.98 526 69020 260 65,82 620 15000 150,359.56 320 80232 220 416.18 620 15000 5,160.00 7 ,640.00 400.00 19,834.00 81865 02218 44.17 45.38 619 61160 120 5180 619 64160 260 89.85 (( 65.82 576.00 '101 68010 120 ,1322 375.00 101 51350 250 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL II{PROVEI.{ENTS FUND SEI.IER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND I.IATER TUND SEgER FUND SOLID IIASTE FUND GOLF CENTER FU}ID SELF IIISURANCE FUND TACILITIES SERVICES TUND EOUIPMEIIT SERVICES TUND INFORMATION SERVICES FU}ID FIRE I'IECHANIC SERVI CES FUIID TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 03' 15- 2002 NAI.'E TBtS rS r0 I NCLUS IVE, THE AI,{OI..INT OFFICIATS, ACCORDANCE RESPECTTULLY SUEI'!ITTED, CITY OF BURLINGAI'IETIARRAIIT REGISTER TUND RECAP - 01-02 PAGE 12 AMOUNT 83,374.83 988,58 orq ,q-l?. tra FUND 10'l 320 327 526 527 528 529 618 619 620 621 6?5 731 721 .94 805.85 202.73 089.99 109,01 183.08 130.82 389 .15 980,57 449,00 219.55 826 7 33 1 23 4 12 3 1 16 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL HONORAELE I,IAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: 51 ,028,645 .4O1tn"a.r))'()tl.>:)(4>4,<})) C{._ ft?Ss- o*.- 11<1 t c-k- ? I "53 wtD VOI D VOI D ll CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBEREO FROI{ 1THROUGII'I2 AI.ID/OR CLAIMS NUI.{BERED FROH 81708 TI,IROUGH 81855 TNCLUSIVE,TOTALTIIG IN OT $1,028,615.40, HAVE BEEI,I CHECKEO II! DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AND IN I.IY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN L'ITH TIIEIR RESPECTIVE AUOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYI.IENT DATE DATECOUNCI L (( (( CITY OT BURLIIIGAI4EL'ARRANT REGISTER 03/15/02 VENOOR OETAI Lr*r Denotes Hrnd !/ritten Checks PAGE 11 AMOUNT 285 -00 269.91 22,500.00 728.40 31.50 8,060.00 240.00 500.00 500.00 930.95 $1,028,645.40 DIANNA HERRI.IAX I.I I SCELLAIIEOUS 81847 SA}I CARLOS TRANSTER SIDEgALK REPAIR EXPE}ISE 81849 DAVID T. O'KEETE CO4PANY BLD6. & GRO,,NDS I.IAINT. 23537 81848 DEAN CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 23538 ACCOUNT 28t.00 101 56620 269.94 101 66210 219 22,500,00 320 79020 210 728.40 101 68010 190 1586 31.50 101 68010 220 1460 8,060.00 731 225?0 240.00 101 35620 500.00 731 2252' 500.00 731 22525 930.95 731 22543 IIUiIBER NAI.IE 81816 81850 81852 81853 8r 854 81855 TOTAL EI.I I L GERMAI/OV 11I SCELLANEOUS ATAIIACIO ROORIGUEZ L SCELLAIE0US GARY DIEEEL M I SCELLANEOUS GOLDEN STREET PRINTIIIG I,i I SCELLAIIEOUS 23536 23539 23540 23541 ?3542 24543 23544 23515 BARBARA GARROD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8185'1 DtcK soLtilcER OEPOSIT REFU}IDS ( C( 81830 I.|ERIT RESOURCE GROUP TEI{PORARY EIIPLOYI{EIIT SVC. 23076 81831 NUMBER NAI4E EL I ZABETH VILLAGoI,iEZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ERLER AIID KALINOIJSKI, INC. PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI TZED S I.IADEtEI NE FREDA, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PAT SIMOIJS TRAINING EXPENSE CI TY OT BURLINGAI{ELIARRA}IT REGISTER 03/15/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand !,titten Checks ACCOUNT 2,112.00 to,t 64420 011 175.00 101 64420 031 49.00 101 65200 160 35.07 101 68020 190 2300 240.00 101 36620 65.75 101 64250 110 3,496.00 731 22520 165,00 101 5a010 250 11oO PAGE 10 Al{0uIT 2,11?.00 175.00 /,9.00 35.07 240.00 65.75 3,496.0O 165.00 297 ,75 555.50 414.75 11 ,711.74 1,182,15 '1 ,000.00 350.00 23255 81835 BotsE cAscADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 OTFICE EXPEIJSE 81836 TLC ADIIINISTRATORS iII SCELLA},IEO,JS 81832 AT&T gIRELESS coitituN I cAI IoNS 81833 KELLY I.IOORE PAI}IT CO BLOG. & GROJNDS I.iAI NT. 81834 ROSS EDIARDS I'ITSCELLANEOUS ELLIOTT INVESTIIEI,IT GROUP DEPOSIT REFUNDS 81837 RoN LtllLE TRAVEL & UEETINGS 81838 CRESCO EOUIPiIENT RENTALS STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 81839 SUSAN PRISANT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.56 192.19 101 66210 ?26 527 665?0 120 23156 23169 23244 23348 23461 23470 23193 23500 23531 23532 23531 81840 81841 81A42 81843 SAII FRAI/CISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES C 23533 COiITRACTUAT SERVICES 81814 556.50 101 6A010 220 1347 414.75 101 6a010 220 1347 11,711.71 526 69020 210 1,182.15 61A 64520 210 1,000.00 320 80510 220 350.00 't01 65200 250 81845 AIIERICAN I,4EDICAL RESPONSE L'EST MISCELLAIIEOUS 235r5 1,128.52 618 61520 231 1 ,128.5? ( ( NUI.IBER IIAI.IE 818I9 AMERICAN ASPHALT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81824 81826 CITY OF BURLINGAIIEIJARRAIIT REGISTER 03/ 15 /02 ( 81814 U|DERGRCIi.JND COI{STRUCTIO [A]iA6ER 22t05 PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIATIZED S 818',t 5 VENDORr*. Denotes Hand tJritten Checks DETAI L ACCOUNT 7,721.91 327 78332 ?10 526.99 528 66600 210 340,00 5?9 68030 220 1,380,00 320 79100 210 180.83 101 68020 160 2300 6,468.00 320 76010 220 11.31 625 65213 203 1,019.00 101 61120 210 231.00 101 58010 220 1580 168.00 101 58010 220 1580 2,282.00 '101 645t0 210 1,187.14 101 65100 292 90.00 101 65200 120 845.50 101 61120 262 PAGE 9 AI.|OUNT 7 ,721 .94 526.99 340.00 1 ,380.00 't80.83 6,468.00 44.31 12.50 1,019.00 231 .00 168.00 2,282.00 1 ,187.44 90.00 845.50 THERHO GAS TECH PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 81815 J.l.t. RtDG!/AY CO. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81817 DKS ASSoCTATES PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S 81818 VERIZONI./IRELESS co4itult I cAT I 0N s 22324 22115 22468 22593 22598 22769 22793 22818 ??863 22866 22877 ??603 81821 FIREI,TASTER SOUTH SAN TRANCISCO FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI },IT. 22661 81822 itILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL IZEO S 22751 81820 coAcH coLoR co, TIRE APPARATUS I,IAINT. 81823 cHRIS liI LANO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES JAI.IES YARBOROUGH COIITRACTUAT SERVICES 81825 JONES A}iD MAYER PROFESSIO}.IAL & SPECIALIZED S CHUCK CASTLE POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE BlNGtiAltrs iI I SC. SUPPLIES 81828 vALLO{BRoSA TRAIIIING EXPENSE 81827 22899 1,172.61 101 65100 140 1 ,172,61 ( 12.50 101 65200 203 81829 PEIIINSULA UXIFORI,4 & EOUIPMENT UiII TOR}IS AND EOUIPI.IE}IT (( NUIIEER IIAHE 81798 CITY OT BURLINGAiIE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER 03/15 /02 VEIIDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks PAGE 8 ATIOUNT 202.50 17 .73 275.00 1 ,375.43 254.00 320.00 644 .87 164,89 2,120.50 22,000.00 2,375.10 398,07 314,94 1?7.02 199.00 TURIIOUT SERVICES UNt FORI.IS ATID EOUIPMENT 81800 FI LTERTRESH COTFEE EXCELLENCE BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 81799 81803 818',]0 ARCH I.IIRELESS co uli I cAT I Ot/ S 81811 ROBERIS AND BRUNE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 81812 CO}IPUTER UAGIC TRAINING TRAI N I NG EXPENSE ACC0UIT 202.50 101 68010 220 1312 17.73 101 65200 140 275.00 621 61150 190 1,375.11 101 56210 ??2 261.00 101 68010 220 ,t345 320.00 'to'l 68010 220 1346 644.87 101 65400 120 161.89 101 65200 110 2,120.50 619 64460 220 5190 22,000.00 529 68030 220 2,375.10 101 61120 210 398.07 101 68020 200 2300 334.91 101 66240 160 127.02 527 66520 120 199,00 101 64420 260 TINA !/ITKERSOII COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 21168 ?16?3 21680 21685 21918 21981 ?2070 22178 ?2271 81802 TRACY SIRI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21713 81804 EI{FORCEI.IEIIT TECHNOLOGY, INC. tl t sc. SUPPLIES 81805 coRpoRATE EXPRESS OF THE !'EST, r 21819 OFFICE EXPEIISE 81805 A& L JANITORIAL SERVICE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 21936 81807 vB LISA COFFARO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLT LLC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81808 rEoA PROFESSIOI/AL & SPECIALIZED S 81809 SARToR SAr,l lloRKs EOUI PI{ENT }tA I NT. ( 81813 itIN r LCo, tNC 11I SC. SUPPLIES 22277 23.11 619 64460 120 5110 23 .11 21194 81801 L'ESTERII HIGHUAY PRODUCTS, INC. TRAFFIC COIITROL I{ATERIALS 21749 22089 ( NUi.IBER }IAI,IE 81783 81785 81788 81793 81796 CITY OF BURLIN6AI,4E!/ARRANT REGISTER 03/ 15 /02 VENDOR DETAI Lrrr Denotes tland l,/titten Checks PAGE 7 AiIOTJNT 176.00 877.r0 930.41 1,52?.12 371.75 500.00 176.00 2,181 .00 1 ,099.95 711.28 640.00 600.00 152.00 900.00 81782 ERIC GIESEKER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JOHII CAHALAN, ASLA PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 81781 IIESTERN STAR NURSERIES }.I I SCELLANEOUS 19990 81786 EL CAI.II NO CHARTER LI}.IES IIIC r.t I sc. SUPPLIES 20105 UTILITY AERIAL I},|C EOUI P}tEiIT I.IAINT. 8,I787 DANIEL SIRAI{BI I,{ISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 877.50 320 80140 210 930.11 731 22560 1,522,1? 101 68020 200 2300 371.75 10't 68010 120 1321 500.00 731 22525 176.00 101 68010 220 1580 2,r81.00 619 64460 220 5180 1,099.95 101 66240 250 711.28 320 80580 210 640.00 101 68010 220 1231 600.00 10't 580'10 220 1231 180.82 620 15000 152.00 101 68010 220 1580 900,00 't01 65200 112 19191 19561 19865 20134 ?1132 21136 21216 21429 20564 E1789 IBS BUILDING I,IAINTENANCE CO, CONIRACTUAL SERVICES 81791 NI I EYER, CATHERINE J. , PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAI I ZED S 21121 81790 }IATIOiIAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, IN 21I07 TRAINI}iG EXPEIISE JULIO I.IORAN CONTNACTUAL SERVICES 81792 i.IELAN IE I.iARAN I COIITRACTUAL SERVICES RE},IEE RAMSEY CO}ITRACTUAL SENVICES 81791 REDUOOO GENERAL TIRE SUPPTIES 81795 JO}IATHAN TURNER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PREETI B. TIKEIGR SUPPLI ES 81797 FRISCO DEL ROSAR IO COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 21442 1,201.50 101 68010 220 1347 1 ,201.50 (( 20783 176.00 101 68010 220 1580 180.82 21399 (( CITY OI BURLINGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER 03/15 /0? VENDOR '*r oenotes Hand gritten Checks NUMBER NAIIE 81766 BAY AREA }IOSILE GLASS rNC EOUIPMENT IlAINT. DETAIL ACCOTJNT 376.44 529 68030 200 42oo 102.00 619 61160 210 9110 2,953.15 526 69020 120 678.00 526 69020 011 985.98 731 22560 39.37 526 690?0 160 32,406.50 527 66530 270 786,572.22 320 76010 220 110.29 101 65200 220 280.85 101 66100 120 134.10 101 64200 150 361,00 '10't 68010 120 1460 17901 18103 PAGE 6 AMOUNT 376.11 102.00 2,953.45 678- 00 986.98 39.37 32,106.50 786,572.22 110,29 280.85 131 ,40 80.00 361.00 185.90 4,501..88 81767 CRANE PEST CONTROL PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 81764 DEESIGNS t'I I SC. SUPPLIES PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18388 8',1769 LABOR READY, INC. TE}IPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 14659 81NO VALLEY CREST TREE CO!.IPAIIY }IISCELLAiIEq,S 18713 81771 VERI ZOl,t UIRELESS XESSAGI G SERVT 18763 co{ltuil I cAT loNs 81ri2 REGIO}IAL I{ONITORT G PROGRAi4 OTIIER AGENCY COiITRI BUTIONS 817rJ DEUTIS J. AI,{OROSO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 18970 81771 19027 81775 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES MtSC. SUPPLTES 19047 81776 ANG NE!/SPAPERS PUEI.ICATIO}IS & ADVERIISING '19083 817N LIEEERI CASSIOY HSITI.IORE TRAI NING EXPEIISE 19095 81N8 A-ABCO RENTS & SEILS I.I I SC. SUPPL!ES 19114 81779 BURTON ' S FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. FIRE APPARATUS iIAINT. 19366 81780 SIGNET TESTIIIG LAES PROIESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL IZED S 19367 4,504.8 320 76010 210 101 65200 203 625 65213 203 ( 41781 EAKER ' S CHEI,I-DRY PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19131 395.00 -31 ,99 218.89 18900 80,00 101 64120 262 195.00 619 64460 210 5180 ( NU}{8ER NAiIE 81755 81761 E1763 CITY OF BURLINGAITEliARRANT REGISTER 03/ 15 /02 VENOORr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks ( PAGE 5 CHI ET GARY I,I. I.IISSEL OTFICE EXPEI{SE I.II SC. SUPPLIES UN I TORI.IS A D EAUIPMENT c0t4 t N r cATroNs BLDG. & GROJNDS I'IAINT. EOUIPMENT t.iAIlIT. PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S DUES & SUBSCRTPTIOIIS TRAVEL & }IEETIIIGS TRAINING EXPEi/SE I{ISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE POLICE INVESTIGATTO},I EXPENSE r.r I ScELLA EOUS CAPITAL EOUIPMENT I,ITSCELLANE(nJS 13720 16317 16872 '16911 DElAIL 988.20 648.36 550.31 67.17 313.48 151.56 2,3?1.0? 3.01 1 ,542.55 155.00 3n .55 315,21 31.81 113 .27 1 ,445.23 ACCOUNT 10't 6t100 101 55100 101 65100 t 01 65',t00 101 65100 101 65100 101 65100 101 65100 101 65100 t0t 65100 101 65100 101 65100 101 65100 101 65100 731 22574 AI'IOUN T 7,874.30 27.01 2,532.00 10t ,8'l 1,386.38 67 .09 349,01 610,52 1 ,590.31 110 120 140 160 190 200 210 240 250 260 290 292 703 800 341 .88 21.00 72.00 14371 81757 ALt CITY I4ANAGEMEI,IT CONTRACTI'AL SERVTCES 15595 81758 I.{ D LINEN SERVICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15A27 81759 supERton ALU[txuu B@y coRp. I.I I SCELLANEOJS 16229 81760 81756 R ITZ CAMERA OFTICE EXPEIISE SYDI,IEY MAIK@ SHALL T00LS 27.01 101 64350 110 2,532.00 101 65100 220 105.81 10't 65200 220 t,385.38 618 64520 601 67.09 620 66700 130 319.01 101 68010 120 1694 610.52 101 68020 140 2300 58.28 526 69020 120 CONNEY SAFETY PR@UCTS Il I SC. SUPPLIES 81762 ctNTAS CORP. #464 UNI FORI.IS A}IO EAUIPIIENT 17124 81764 COLORPRINT DIGITAL OFFI CE EXPENSE COXTRACTUAL SERVICES OFFICE EXPENSE '17497 GOLDEN NURSERY I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 101 65300'110 320 80301 220 621 64450 110 8176' CALIFORNIA P}IEUiIATIC TOOL CO I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES 1n41 94.50 526 690?0 120 ( 58.28 91.50 (( l0 0 0 200 200 65 65 CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE!,ARRAIIT REGISTER 03/15 /02 VENDOR OETAI L.*' Denotes Hand Uritten Checks PAGE 4 NUI.IBER NAITIE 81743 81714 SEOUOIA UI{ION HIGH SCHOOL OFFICE EXPEIISE 81717 8ARKER BLUE REPROGRAPIIICS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 81748 DARYL D. JoNES, INC. ccllMu]r I CAT I O]t S 81719 81752 8't755 IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYIIIG, INC. CLAII.iS PAYI4ENTS 81754 ORCHARD SUPPLY IIARDIJARE MISC. SUPPLIES SMATL IOOLS CA}IINO REAL PET CLINIC ittsc. suPPLtEs 366.67 101 64250 1'10 09670 09990 10101 '1 1348 11352 11577 n .90 117.75 ACCOUNT AtiouNT 225.65 366.67 2,129.01 900.00 66.03 52.61 231 .34 1,050.32 392.57 544.48 097?0 81745 09790 817t6 GARY tl. OLSoi,l, PH.D. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 09902 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC TRAFFIC CONTROL I'IATERIALS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAI NIN6 EXPETISE MISC. SUPPLIES 649 297 90 90 46 69 93 93 101 66210 222 320 40170 220 526 69020 260 527 66520 120 10256 81750 I,iEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 11101 81711 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC I.II SC. SUPPLIES IJINGTOOT CO{iIERCtAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11516 FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT. ROMEO PACKING CO I'IISC. SUPPLIES 900.00 101 61120 210 121.21 t01 55200 160 52,51 101 55200 111 231.34 320 790?0 210 1,050.32 101 65200 203 392 -57 529 68030 120 4200 420.00 618 61520 601 544,48 101 65100 120 ( 420.00 66.03 61A 64520 210 ( CITY OF BURLINGAII1EL'ARRA}IT REGISTER 03t 15 t0? VENDOR DETAIL '*. Denotes Hand Llritten Checks PAGE 3 }IUI/IBER NA}.IE 81729 81730 81f31 81732 81733 8',1731 81rj& 81739 81710 03587 81735 ToMARK SPoRTS, INC, BLDG. & GROI,NDS iIAIIIT. 03761 81736 ALLSTAR TIRE EOUIPMENT, II,IC. UNI FORI,IS AND EOUIPI{ENT 03938 81737 PATTERSON PARTS, INC FIRE APPARATUS MAI}IT. SUPPLIES PERSOI,IAL A!'ARDS, I I,IC. }iI SC. SUPPLIES PUTNATI BUICK POI'ITIAC GIIC SUPPTIES SAN MAIEO COUNTY ENVIRO}IMENTAL PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S RANDY SCIII'ARTZ TRAVEL & I,IEETINGS SNAP ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS L'EST GROUP PAYI'IE},IT CTR. I.I I SC. SUPPLIES JULIE COHN COIITRACTUAL SERVICES c0t T/0, coNNoR CITY HALL MAINTE}IA}ICE LY}.IGSO GARDEN I'IATERIALS BLDG. & GROUI'IDS MAI }.IT. MISC, SUPPLIES 03106 03145 03206 03380 03518 03964 09143 09499 301.55 l0l 68010 120 1580 22.88 620 15000 563.00 528 66600 210 979.00 ',101 68020 250 531.33 620 66700 130 468,26 101 68020 190 2200 87.38 ',I01 65200 110 264,13 101 61350 120 560,00 101 @010 ?20 1344 210.00 621 61150 200 36.61 79.04 101 65200 203 620 15000 285 . 16 94.97 42.50 185.80 620 15000 625 65213 203 ACCOUIT AMOUNT 1 15.65 304.56 22.88 979.00 168.26 87.38 261.13 560- 00 2'10.00 380. 13 228.30 81742 09560 286,10 46,71 101 68020 190 2200 101 68020 200 2200 332,81 (( 563.00 531.33 09122 09132 81711 NoEL L. MTLLER, tNC, SUPPLIES FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 101 68020 190 2200 526 69020 120 SAN MATEO LA!]N I{OIER SNOP BLDG. & GRqJNDS I.IAI NT, EOUIPI4E}IT I.IAINT. (( CITY OF BURLINGAIiIEUARRAIIT REG I STER 03/ 15 /02 VENOOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks 141 .21 798.09 2.82 15,48 15.19 -1 ,357.16 34.29 51 .90 167.50 t 80.78 766.36 119.67 66520 130 64460 120 5160 65700 130 101 66210 219 lo1 66210 226 526 69020 120 PAGE 2 AMOUIIT 437,49 2,376.00 549.91 I ,818.56 267 -13 199.02 1 ,066.51 2,299.10 3,993.40 1,260.03 97.43 BURLI NGA}IE STAT IONERS OFTICE EXPENSE I{ I SC. SUPPLIES 81718 AIIASTASIA COLE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES DTCTAPI{OI,IE CORPORATION EOUIPI.IENT MA I NT. 01945 81719 CoRPoRATE Eltvr RONMENTS, rNC., iII SC. SUPPLIES 81720 ACCOUNT 402,93 34.56 101 68020 1'10 101 58010 120 ',t 100 2,376.00 101 6aO10 220 1344 519,91 10'l 58010 120 1101 1,848.56 101 65150 200 267.13 101 68020 192 2200 NUIIBER }IAI4E 81717 817?1 81722 81723 817?6 81727 EIIII.iG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS MI SCELLANEOUS U.!]. GRAI NGER, INC. SMALL TOOLS 8TDG. & GROUI.IDS I,,IAI NT. VEI{I CLE MA I IIT. FIRE APPARATUS }.1AI NT. 8LDG. & GROUNDS I.iAI }II. EOUI PiIE}II I,4A1NT. SMALL TOOLS MISC. SUPPLIES SUALL TOOLS 01676 02057 02157 02248 02457 02645 03041 101 101 101 101 526 526 527 619 620 6520 6902 6902 200 0 0 0 0 2200 130 190 202 203 190 200 20 6520 65 680 02261 81724 HARDING ESE, rNC. PROFESSTONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 02365 81725 GRANITE ROCT COfiPANY SIDE!/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURTACING EXPENSE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES HEILETT PACKARD CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES X & t.] DISCOJNT LIGHTI}.|G & SUPP I.I I SC. SUPPLIES PACIFIC NURSERIES I.I I SC. SUPPL IES 2,299.40 320 76010 210 5,993.40 101 55100 220 1,250.03 101 66210 120 97.13 tol 68020 120 2200 81728 P. G. & E. GAS & E LECTR I C HI SCELLANEOUS 03051 19,894.84 2,191.93 101 65?40 170 101 66210 173 22,086.77 ( 01992 C NUI.IBER NAI{E 81709 81710 81711 41713 81714 81715 81716 16.11 42.44 8.55 '10.00 1 ,990,20 8,09 101 101 101 619 620 620 65200 55200 55200 61160 15000 66700 201 ?02 203 120 5160 130 AI.IOUNT 395.89 7,117.64 135,50 105.20 136.00 60.00 562.89 ?,075.39 80,00 ( CI TY OF BURLINGAME |,,ARRANT REGISTER 03/ 15 /02 VEIIDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks ACCOUNT ACE HARDI]ARE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS VEHICLE MAINT. IRAFFI C COIITROL I,4ATERIALS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SI.IALL TOOLS 101 101 101 101 526 526 55100 65200 65200 66210 59020 59020 120 130 202 120 130 01027 01030 01052 01059 01078 01305 0r 313 01507 01551 82,33 58.55 2.76 5.04 183.57 63.61 ACTION CLEANII,IG SERVICE EOUI PMENT I.IAINT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT. 349,03 6,714.31 50.3/' 101 65400 200 619 61160 220 621 61150 190 ALPI NE AHARDS, INC. OTFICE EXPENSE i,I SC. SUPPLIES 05 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 81712 A}.ITECH ELEVATOR SERVICES EaU lPI'IENT ilAlNT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31 .38 103.92 527 66520 110 527 66520 120 316.39 216.50 101 66210 120 5?7 66520 120 105.20 101 68020 190 2200 60.00 101 61250 031 207.00 229.00 RAH}.I EECKER MI SCELLAIIEOUS HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL MISC. SUPPLIES }1I SC. SUPPLIES EURLINGAI.IE AUTO SUPPLY GAS, OIL & GREASE VEHICLE I.IA I NT. FIRE APPARATUS I1AINT. MISC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES S}IALL TOOLS CITY OF BURLINGAI'IE I.I I SCELLANEOJS 80.00 't01 32100 ( 81708 PAGE 1 101 65400 200 619 61460 220 5110 BURLINGA ME PUBLIC LIBflARY Burlingame hrblic LibrarY Board of Tnrstees Minutes February Lgr 2OO2 Call to Order President, Mar5r Herman, called the meeting of February 19, 2OO2 to order at 4:3O pm. Roll Call Trustees Present: Cecile Coar, Jane Dunbar, Andrew Gurthet rrustee Absent: Uffi#:ffi:"ormack Staff Present: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian Jacquelin e Zlatunich, Recorder City Representation: L,arry Anderson, City Attorney ilI. Warrants and SPeclal Funds Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants as presented. M/ S/C (Dunbar/Gurthet) [V. Mlnutes A. Legislative Day - Tfustee Dunbar asked for clarification as to the date of Legislative Day. A1 Escoffier, City Librarian, exlclained that February 1st was a District Legislative D"y, and May 7th will be a Legislative Day in Sacramento. B. The minutes of the January 19,2OO2 meeting were approved. M/S/C (Coar/Dunbar) v. Corresoondence and Attachments A. Duncan Trust Statement Members of the Board would like to see previous years comparisons of the Duncan Tfust Funds. Al Escoffier agreed to prepare a spreadsheet comparison of annual earnings for the next meeting. I. Primrose RoodoBurlingome.CA 940,l0 4083\***. pls. I ib.c o.us fpls/Rls,html a7 II. B. CLA/PLCF Informatlon President Herman suggested ttrat the report on the Patriot Act by Larry Anderson be moved to the first part of the agenda. IX. New ness B. Patriot Act Information Larry Anderson gave a brief history on intelligence gathering in the United States. With the new technolory of the Internet there has been debate on the need for broader authority. He explained current intelligence gathering powers such as "roving wire tap", "pen register", and "trap and trace". The Federal government thinks these powers should extend to the Internet. The ACLU maintains that it is an invasion of privacy. As pertains to the library, a warrant is necessar5r before any information may be released. Patron registration is conlidential but law enforcement would have a right to sign-up lists for use of the Internet. If we keep records ttrey must be kept for two years according to State law. Reference does no tracking of subject researched linked to patrons. President Herman suggested that ttre subject be tabled until the next meeting. Subjects for further consideration are: (1) whether to keep sign-up sheets for Internet reservations or consider some other more €rnon5rrnous means of reserving use. (2) should signage noti$,ing patrons of possible surveillance be posted. Corresoondence and Attachments The remainder of ttre correspondence and attachments were reviewed. From the Floor- None VII. Reportg A. City Llbrariants Report - Al Escoffier reviewed his report and the November/ December statistics. Issues discussed were: 1. Funding Capital Improvements - If funding for capital outlay is limited this year the Board of Trustees may look to other sources for funding. 2. www.Tutor.com, a State Library grartt-funded program, will begin in March. There will be a six month pilot program spearheaded by Barry Mills and Pat Harding. T?rere was discussion regarding partnering with schools so that students might access this program from their school. The board members asked for a report on this program at the end of the six months. They also asked if it would be available in other languages. c Library Board of Trustees Minutes February 19, 2OO2 V. VI B. System Advlsory Report - Agendize Appointment of the Burlingame Representative - Al Escoffier suggested that Mary Lou Morton could be reappointed as our System Advisory Board representative. A1 will check with Mary Lou. The matter was tabled until the next meeting C. Foundatlon Report - Dunbar The Duncan Trust statement was reviewed. uII Unfinished Business A. Duncan Trust Status - Discussed under item a, section 5. New Buslness A. Elegant Affalr Fundralser At present tJle Elegant Affair fundraiser is planned for either a Friday or Saturday evening in October. T?rere was discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of each day. Trustee Gurthet asked which day had more patron use. He is concerned about upsetting patrons with an unexpected closure of tl.e library. Al will check on that aspect of closure of the library. B. Patrlot Act Information- Moved to item b, section 5 at request of President Herman. C. Flag Pole Gift - Acceptance It was moved to accept this generous gift from the Lions Club. M/S/C (Coar/ Gurthet). Tfustee Dunbar suggested that a tJrank you letter should be written and sent expressing the trustee's appreciation for their continued support and the assurance that the Lion's Den would have a presence in the renovated building. D. Budget Report - Escoffrer The city's revenues have fallen sigrrificantly beginning last summer due to a loss in TOT (Transient Occupancy Tax). This will affect both the current year and next year's budget. Ix. E. Strateglc Planning Proposal Funding - Duncan/ Special Fund Ttrere was a motion to authorize funding of the Strategic Planning Proposal up to $1o,ooO from the Trustees Special Fund. M/S/C (Dunbar/ Gurthet) F. Business Card Order New business cards will be printed with the new email addresses and new phone numbers for staff and trustees. Library Board of Trustees Minutes 3 February 19,2OO2 X. Announcements A. Statewlde Trustees Conference There are two spaces available at the State Conference in Sacramento. President Herman recommended this conference. Trustee Gurthet would like to attend. A1 will check with Ttustee McCormack. B. Retlrement Dinner Trustee Dunbar suggested having a dinner for retired Board members, Kris Cannon and Jeff Berger immediately following the March 19th Board meeting. XI Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:5O pm. M/S/C (Gurthet/ Dunbar). A1 gave tJee Board members copies of the proposed design plans for the Easton Branch renovation. Respectfully Submitted 0//2N1fu^ Alfred H. Escoffier City Librarian Library Board of Tfllstees Minutes February 19, 2OO2 4 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD CALTFORNTA 9401G3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIG, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - UnaPProved Thursday, March 14, 2AO2 Commissioners Present: Jim Mclver, Chair Russ Cohen Commissioners Absent: Jim Evans, Vice Chair Lisa De Angelis David Mayer StaffPresent: Staff Absent: Visitors: Frank Erbacher, Assistant Director of Public Works Homayoun Barekat, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works Officer Ken Tamurq Police Deparhnent Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Deparhrent Corine Hubsher, 9 Dwight Road,Burlingame James Peters, 18 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame Sonya Peters, 18 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame Paul Leininger,9 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame Carol Leininger,9 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame Carla Sebretti, 10 Bloomfield Road, Burlingame Christopher Mufloa 1428 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame Kristina McCleary,323 Dwight Road, Burlingame Robin Richardson, 460 8.19tr Ave. #6, San Mateo Stacey Murray, 305 Old County Road #144, Belmont Carol Terrones,2583 Wentworth Dr., San Bruno Richard Terrotres,2583 Wentworth Dr., San Bruno Daniel Newgren, 6203 Quicksilver Ave., Newark S. Mey, 2332Castic Place, Santa Clara James Miranda, 1240 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame Renee Harrell, 1240 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame Jennifer Castello, 3 94 Lexington Way, Burlingame TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday , March 14,2002 Visitors: (cont'd)John Roman,2839 Arguello Drive, Burlingarne Danielle Roman, 2839 Arguello Drive, Burlingame Jimmie Jaber,2831 Arguello Drive, Burlingame Rose Jaber,283l Arguello Drive, Burlingame Mary Cotter, 2847 kguello Drive, Burlingame Joe Cowan,1657 Rollins Road, Burlingame Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, Burlingame The City of Burlingame Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 14, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m.by Chair Mclver. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 2 of 5 Commissioners present. There was no quorum; so no action was taken. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.1 ACTION ITEMS. 4.1.1 Minutes for February 14,2@l2, were submitted. 4.1.2 1710 Trousdale Drive - Blue tlandicappedZone in front of ramp The petitioner was not present. Mr. Barekat advised the petitioner now is requesting a green zone instead of a blue zone. This will be on the Agenda next month if they still want a blue zone. 4.1.3 Installation of a Green Zone on Bloomfield Road north of Peninsula Avenue Testimony was received from the floor: Mr. Terrones: Regardless of where the green zone is, parents will continue to drop off and pick up their kids, the parking stalls on the property cannot be reconfigured to add one more stall, so a green zone on Bloomfield or Peninsula is needed, also, the school should encourage parents to walk their kids to school. School owner, Ms. Hubsher, iterated that the green on Peninsula is ideal and have had no accidents in the last 3 years, the green zone is only neededT-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.r., she has 13 employees: 3 take the bus, I walks and the 9 who drive, park on Arundel, also, they have a dumpster in the parking lot so has 9 spaces which are always empty for drop off and pick up. Mr. Newgren said green zone is needed at peak times. Ms. Richardson zubmitted a letter io the commission with pictures and a petition attached. When she picks up or drops offher niece, she must carry a car seat, a diaper bag, and various sundries, plus the baby which is too much to have to walk any distance. Ms. I*ininger lives on Bloomfield next door to the school and has 3 children. She objects to a green zone on Bloomfield since it will increase the traffic flow on this street. She expects cars to use her driveway to facilitate a u-turn to access the green zone on Bloomfield. A solution is to increase spaces in the private lot or stagger the time for picking up and dropping off. Mr. kininger stated he has lived here 22yearc and can seldom park in front of his home on Bloomfield. Businesses must accommodate the zoning, especially if it is a growing business. Many cars from the San Mateo side of Peninsula park on Bloomfield. The centerline on Peninsula should be moved over to accommodate another westbound lane. He suggested enlarging the school's driveway apron so cars can circle in and out. Agrees with a timed green zone in school's front area with an attendant available to take the children into and out of the school. Ms. Murray said Peninsula traffic is too fast but the green zone on Peninsula is the shortest route for the kids. Also, she doesn't like the idea of dropping off children to an attendant. The City of Burlingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March'14, 2AO2 Mr. Peters observed lot use and number of drop offs on various days:2115, 7 cars in the lot, 49 cars dropped off; 2118, 7 cars in the lot, 3 on Peninsula; 2119, M cars dropped off, 4 on Peninsula; 212A,44 cars picked up, 5 cars on Peninsula, spaces available in lot. Believes owner should asphalt dirt area in lot and re-stripe making 12 spaces. This would make a green zone on Bloomfield unnecessary. At 5: 15 p.m. there are cars parking on westbound Peninsula across from the restaurants a few blocks eastward, and there's no safety issue there. Even with a green zone on Bloomfield, people will park on Peninzula. Parking in the evening on the San Mateo side is available. Ms. Richardson measured the school's lot which is 32' wide by 50' long; and with space needed for cars to back up, no more spaces can be added. The owner stated that there is no need to asphalt the dirt area because parents already use that area anyway. She has 68 kids in school being dropped offand picked up everyday. Ms. McCleary asked if traffrc safety overrides school safety. She has noticed that traffrc on Peninsula has increased in the last 10 years; and feels, we must compromise. She likes the green zone on Bloomfield with time limitation. Even though cars will stop and wait to circle for space on Bloomfield, residents should use their own driveways and garages rather than the City street for parking. Ms. Abbey stated the residents have a right to have parking spaces available on their street for visitors. Mr. Erbacher advised that if a green zone is installed on Bloomfield, it would be timed for the peak period. The centerline on Peninsula may be able to be moved by making the curb larrre 12 feet wide and the other lane 10 feet wide. Mr. Barekat suggested the possibility of a special meeting for this issue be held before the regular April meeting since we have no quonrm this evening. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 1240 Paloma Avenue - lruer regarding Blue Handicapped Zone The petitioner was present and stated that they have a two-car garage for their two cars; but her husband's work truck is too long for the driveway. He is permanenfly disabled, so theyte asking for a blue zone close to their house so he doesn't have to walk far after work every night. They noticed that there is a blue zone also on the 1300 block of Paloma. 4.2.2 1100 Carolan - ktter regarding maintaining existing 2-hour parking and adding 2-hour parking along new curbing Petitioner was not present. 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. 5.1 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extension Joe Cowan of the SFPUC stated that an employee at another site was killed when struck by a car while exiting that site's driveway. This site was surveyed and they determined that they need an extension of one existing red zone to eliminate parking near the driveway which would facilitate exiting the The City of Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 1 4, 2002 driveway with a good view of cross traffic which tends to move at over 35 mph. Also, a second red zone needs repainting. Officer Tamura advised that Rollins Road is now on selective enforcement due to this request. Mr. Erbacher advised that the City will notice the neighborhood of this request for the next meeting. 5.2 1309 North Carolan Avenue - Request for Red Zone The petitioner was not present. 5.3 Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive - Request for 3-Way Stop Signs Mr. Roman submitted a signed petition for this request. He stated that there are numerous blind spots for drivers accessing this intersection which is a hazard for the neighborhood children and for cars backing out of their driveways at this site. Also, there has been an increase in school traffic for the Franklin School. Ms. Cotter stated her home is at this intersection which is on the crest of a hill; and with the police upping their enforcement on Trousdale, more drivers are using Arguello now. Accessing her driveway is becoming more haratdous. Mr. Barekat advised that the centerline needs to be replaced and he will request it. Comm. Cohen asked if the increased traffic is due to the temple nearby. Mr. Roman stated no, it's due to avoidance now of Trousdale and increased school traffic. 5.4 Dwight Road at kxington Way - Request for Stop Sign Ms. Castello complained of speeders on Dwight Road. One driver went so fast, she crashed into her fro t irard tree to avoid hitting an on-coming car. She feels a stop sign would slow down drivers. Mr. Barekat advised that there are existing Yield signs at this intersection. 5.5 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to determine whether trafflrc-calming measures are warranted Officer Tamura submitted their Sekctive Enforcement resits which showed 15 citations issued and three warnings. 5.6 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail) 5.7 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition) Mr. Mufloz stated he lives on the 1400 block where the number of parked cars allows only one driving lane so drivers go slow. Chair Mclver stated that construction trucks are a problem, too. The City ol Bud Eame Page 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 1 4, 2OO2 5.8 2415 Adeline Drive - ktter regarding Traffic Concerns related to Sisters of Mercy Iocale Ms. Abbey thanked staff for the addition of centerline dots on Adeline; however, they still have speeders and heavy traffic with most traffic going to and from the Mercy campus. She wants Mercy to re-open their mair gate. AIso, she would like to have a solid yellow centerline on various blocks of Adeline. Speeders are driving over the newly installed centerline dots increasing noise pollution. 6. FROM THE FLOOR - No comments. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS. 7.1 From Staff to Commission 7 .1.2 Traffrc Engineer's Report Mr. Barekat advised that the City received a low bid for the traffic signal and pedestrian signal for Califomia Drive. Also, the Residential Traffic Calning Program goes before the City Council on March 18 for their approval. A speed hump policy will be introduced in April and notices will be sent out in advance of that meeting. Mr. Barekat announced that he is resigning effective March 15e to work in another city. Chair Mclver thanked him for all his work and wished him well. Mr. Erbacher also thanked Mr. Barekat for his expertise in producing the RTCP for Burlingame. 7.1.3 StaffAction l,og Mr. Erbacher advised that 2520 Poppy Drive has been completed with a yellow zone. 7.2 Frcm Commission to Staff 7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests - None. 7.2.2 Comments and communication Chair Mclver stated that on March 286, he will attend a Millbrae-BART Advisory Commission meeting in an advisory capacity. The meeting will be in the back of Millbrae City Hall at 7 p.m. 7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, April 11, 2002 meeting - None. The City of Burlingame Page 6 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 1 4, 2OO2 8. INACTIVE ITEMS. 8.1 Request for traffic control on Dwight Road Mr. Erbacher stated he received plans from the designer and will review them soon. 8.2 Millbrae BART Station - Potential Impacts on City streets 8.3 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOP sign on Trousdale at Quesada Way. Results of Traffrc Data Gathering - Speed limits Officer Tamura submitted ther Selective Enforcement results which showed 33 citations issued and seven wamings. 9. AGENDIZE FOR THE NEXT MEETING. Due to no quorum, March Agenda items will remain for next month's meeting. 10. ADJOURNMENT. 9:20 p.m. The City ot Bulingame Page 7 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA April 8,2002 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL ilI. MINUTES V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the public. Chairman Vistica called the April 8,2002, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioner Keele StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Ruben Huriry City Attomey, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza The minutes of the March 25,2002 Planning Commission Meeting were approved as mailed were approved as mailed by a voice vote 6-0- I (C. Keele absent). Chairman Vistica noted several changes to the Minutes of the Special meeting of March 6,2002,those minutes were amended to read: "p. 3 ; GENERAL, bullet 5. . . like to point out that commission has been voicing concerns about this project for several years and has been ignored, all this concern has been voiced by the community but the DEIR does not find any significant impacts, it makes the project seem like a benign little project, needs to be revisited; P. 4; AESTFIETICS, COMPATABILITY, MAS S AND SITING, bullet 9... the initial study in the back of the Draft EIR noted that aesthetics was considered potentially significant, but this is not mentioned elsewhere,p lease clarify; and p. 5; WEB BASED DELIVERIES, bullet 1 . . . the EIR has no reference to the proposal for web-based home deliveries, needs to be articulated in the report there would be less pedestrian shopping, more small trucks, higher kip volume and more large truck deliveries; would like to see a complete analysis of the project which includes the Web Based Delivery Business Plan projected volumes.". No other changes were proposed . Chairman Vistica moved the approve the March 6 minutes as amended; C. Osterling seconded the motion. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). IV. City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 VI. STUDY ITEMS 920 MORRELL AVENUE _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR FENCE EXCEPTION AND VARIANCE FOR PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS TO ALTER AN EXSTING ATTACIIED GARAGE (RAY BRAYER, APPLICANT, DESIGNERAND PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT CP Monroe presented a sunmary of the staff report. Commissioners had the following questions and coflrments ' When was the driveway removed/abandoned? why was the driveway removed?. Was the driveway removed by the current or a previous olvner?. When was the fence built?. Plans should clearly document the number of bedrooms in the house; ' Where do the fence height requirements change on this property? Provide diagram on site plan; ' Applicant should provide other examples of garage doors at property line in Burlingame; ' Noticed several 130-watt light bulbs on the fence posts, light from these bulbs extends past the property line and violates the residential illumination ordinance, needs to be corected; ' Applicant has not identified a hardship, need to look at hardship finding more seriously; ' Not normally grant variances when there are other solutions, could replace the driveway, build new code compliant garage with access off Linden Avenue, or add curb cut at north end of property with a driveway to the back of the garugq there are many solutions which will not need a variance; ' Existing site plan indicates that there is an existing shed attached to the rear ofthe garage, it appears that on the proposed site plan the shed is being incorporated into the garage, please clariff; ' Please clarifr if window in the walk-in closet in being increased in size; and ' On Adeline Drive there are numerous examples of garages immediately off the sidewalk, like landscaping and open space in the front yard, provides a direct access and reduces paving; This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submiued and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ONTHECqNSENTCALENDARARECqNSIDEREDTIBERIUTINE. THEvARE ACTED ON SIMULTANEOUSLY WLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION IS RESUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PNOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON TITE MOTION TO ADOPT, There were no items for review on the Consent Calendar. 1 2 VIII. RE,GULAR ACTION ITEM 2. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 1415 BENITO AVENUE - ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW DETAC}IED GARAGE (JOHNNY DAROSA, DAROSA AND ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; PETER AND SHIRLEY CHIANG, PROPERTY Reference staff report,04.08.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Johnny DaRosa, DaRosa & Associates, designer, and Peter Chiang, were present to answer questions, noted that this is a completely new design. Commission noted a concern with the ll' x 12' second floor deck offthe master bedroom, concerned about privacy and view into other yards, asked the designer if he would consider reducing the size of the deck, typically see a six foot deep deck, would have to cut dec[ in half; designer noted that the deck could be reduced; Commission noted that vinyl double-glazed windows will be used and asked if they will have divided lights? Designer noted that the windows will be custom made to match the existing style; Commission noted that this project has come a long way and asked the designer how did the design review process work? Designer noted that the process worked very well, has worked with all of the consultants on different projects, each consultant has their own preference, provide solutions of benefit to the property owner. Randy Vandenbrink,l4l2 Alvarado Avenue, noted that he would like to see a condition added that the basement height be measured before a building permit is issued, tree at the rear of the property is in poor condition, has vines growing on it and appears to be dying, City Arborist inspected the tree, would like to see a condition added that an arborist report be provided to protect the existing tree during construction, if the tree is ever taken out will be able to see the deck, wrought iron railing is out of character, prefer to see solid wall of stucco to prevent seeing anything stored on deck, this is a better project, not overwhelming one way or the other, built to maximum regulations; Commission noted that the wrought iron railing is consist around the house, solid stucco railing will make the house look massive, hedges would screen the deck; neighbor noted he would rather see a solid wall than materials stored on deck. Designer noted that the trees in the rear yard will not be removed, will maintain for privacy, trees screen deck from neighbor, used wrought iron railing to reduce the mass and bulk, could do a combination of stucco wall and iron railing on the deck. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Boju6s noted that the designer has done a nice job and moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March l2,2002,sheets I - 6, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, replacing the decorative iron with stucco shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, and Recycling Specialist's December 3,2001, memos shall be met;4) thatthe project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;5) that the large existing tree at the rear of the site shall be inspected and an arborist report provided which indicates ways to protect the large existing tree during construction; the inspection shall be aJ City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 completed and arborist report submitted and approved by the city arborist before a building permit is issued;6. that the basement ceiling height shall be less than 6'-0" in height and shall be measured and confirmed by a building inspector at time of a foundation inspection, should the ceiling height be greater than 6'-0" the floor shall be raised by apermanent method approved bythe Building Official beforethenext inspection is scheduled for the project; 7) that the second floor deck at the rear of the house shall extend a maximum of 6'-0" from the second floor wall and shall have a wrought iron railing which matches the iron railings on the rest of the house; and 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Comment on the motion: would it make sense to require replacement of the large tree at the rear if it is in poor condition if its life is limited; no. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m. 3. 520 FRANCISCO DRIVE _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (TOM HALLENDORF, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; FRED STRATHDEE. ARCHITECD (55 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON Reference staffreport , 04.08.A2, with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission noted that the this project is two sqwre feet below the maximum allowed floor area ratio, can a condition be added that the FAR be double-checked? CP noted thatacondition could be added requiring a survey of the building corners before a foundation inspection and the inspection would not be scheduled until the elevations of the foundation installed match those shown on the approved plans. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Tom Hallendorf; applicant and Fred Strathdee, architect, were present to answer questions, thanked the project planner and design review consultant for processing this project, project was previously reviewed as an action item, now back again, accepted all of the design reviewer's comments, consultant visited the site, presented four design concepts to the consultant, narrowed it down to one design, met the six criteria of design guidelines, especially #6 regarding maintaining the character of the existing house, time is of the essence, does not want the house exposed during the rainy season, added a window to the existing bedroom, brought more detail and light to this side of the house. Architect considered moving the addition over by one to two feet, but prefer to have more open space on the other side of the house. Commission asked if applicant will be the contractor for this job and how long has he lived in this house; applicant noted that he will be the contractor, he just bought the house and plans on living here. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Osterling noted that this project has come a long way, the north wall has been broken up nicely, and that the applicant has addressed the Commission's concems, and moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent date stamped April 1, 2002, Sheets I through 3, site plan, floor plans and building elevations; 2) that any changes to the Size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 which would include adding or enlarging a donner(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height orpitch, shall be subjectto design review approval; 3) thatthe corners of the house shall be surveyed by a licensed surveyor and shall be approved by the City Engineer before a foundation inspection scheduled; 4) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 5) that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist and City Engineer's February 25,2A02 memo shall be met; 6) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 7) that the applicant shall contact the city and arrange and pay for planting. The tree shall be a l5-gallon sheet tree in the planter strip at the front of the subject property; the tree shall be selected from the City of Burlingame, Parks Division, Official Street Tree List and shall be consistent in size and growing pattem with the existing species of trees on that block. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: applicant is an engineer and understands tolerances, feels that the applicant will build according to the plans; spoke with the design review consultant regarding the lack of articulation on the north wall, consultant felt that the addition was in keeping with the original design and the existing house next door, felt that the applicant satisfied concerns, would like to add a condition that the corners of the house be surveyed before foundation inspection to confirm compliance with the approved plan. Maker of the motion second agreed. Further comment: not in favor of the project, mass and articulation has not been addressed on 75' long wall it is not in keeping with the style of the house, chimney at the rear is straight and rectangular, not consistent with the chimney detail at the front, original house has recessed windows, looks like a box added to the house. Chairman Vistica called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed ona4-2-l (Cers. Bojuds and Vistica dissenting, C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:50 p.m. 4.II37.II45 PALOMA AVENUE - ZONED R.3 _ APPLICATION FOR NEGATTVE DECLARATION, FRONT SETBACK VARTANCE, VARIANCE FOR DWELLING UNITS IN THREE BUILDINGS ON oNE LOT, AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW THREE (3) STORY, TWELVE (12) UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER, DALE MEYER ASSOCI,ATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; FU-LEN CHENG, PROPERTY OWNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HI]RIN a. Variances and Condominium Permit b. Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Merger and Tentative Condominium Map Referencestaffreport,04.0S.02,withattachments. PlannerHurinpresentedthereport,reviewedcriteriaand staffcomments. Forty-two conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: this site is close to the Broadway commercial area and on a natrow, one-way street, where will the people working on the construction park. CE Murtuza noted for bigger projects a construction staging plan including worker parking is required, can make this a condition of this project. There were no further questions of staff. 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer, architect represented the project. He noted that in response to previous review they eliminated the wall which enclosed the front yard and the gates at the driveway, removed the bridges and replaced them with archways. The apartrnent buildings on the rest ofthe street take up most of their lots, the archways increase the uniform look which is similar to the rest of the street. The entrance has been enhanced with corbels to add detail. Regarding the front setback variance, the existing average without the three houses on this site is l5'-2", they are asking for a 15'-6" setback. Commission felt that the cornmon open space was too shady so took out some of the existing trees and replaced with shrubs to increase light access. Parking meets city code requirements, removal ofone existing driveway will increase the number available on the street; when completed there will be 6 to7 parking spaces on the street at the site. Building is one-quarter of a mile from the railroad station so perhaps not as much parking is needed. Commissioners asked: In previous review raised the issue of affordable housing, have not addressed it. Applicant noted they received information from staffbut the city does not have a specific requirement for affordable units now and feel that they could not proceed at this time to provide affordable units without a city requirement; the project is increasing the number of dwelling units in the city which will help the overall price. Commissioner noted that because there was no law did not mean that providing affordable housing was bad policy, should address. What is the front setback of the apartment next door? l5'-1". Did you consider additional guest parking since on-street parking in this area is almost always full; the towers are quite tall, is it possible to lower them. Applicant noted could add more parking only if reduced landscaping or removed a unit. What about removing a unit? Owner was concerned about the economics of the project, number of city parking lots within a half block in two directions, these lots are not fulI so provide lots of parking opportunity. Applicant noted that the tower could be lowered some, would be reluctant to make it flush with the other roof line because it provides articulation in the elevation. Purpose of the outdoor corlmon area is to be useable to residents, what you have provided is what is left over after you sited the maximum building size, lot coverage is maximum, units are large, building is nicely ornamented, height is right at maximum 3 5 feet, after lowered on site 2 %feet. Tower space is not useable, could make it lower so not dominate ridge line and then you could raise the building so the entrances arc atnatural grade which is more in keeping with the neighborhood. Where will all the meters go and the backflow? Applicant noted : felt that the common open space was at the best location , west side, rear; felt that passive area would provide future users more flexible use; could lower the tower and raise building out of the ground would alter the entire appearance of exterior; lot is zoned for medium density 12-30 units to tlre acre, project is on the lower end, reducing the density (remove unit) is contrary to zoning1' did not want underground parking, there is none in this neighborhood. Should look at connecting drain directly to storm drain in street. The plant code shown on the landscape plan does not correspond to what is called out, please check and be sure all match, especially the larger trees, might show Linden street trees on front elevation. Need vertical element but also need to split entrance so it is level with grade, it is move inviting. Members of the Public: Rudolph Horak, Burlingame Hills; Sandra L'Heureux, I I l3-l I 15 Paloma: want to stay in the area and live near Broadway, units in new condominium on Capuchino are too small 1000 to I100 SF, these units are a good size for two people 1500 to 2000 SF, 5 public lots within %block- 150 parking spaces, often underused; unreasonable to request affordable unit when only 12 units in complex, these will be affordable at $500,000 to $600,000; will there be an electrical meter for each unit; 9 foot ceilings are very attractive. There are 24 properties from Broadway on this part of Paloma, almost all developed with multiple units, concerned with traffic, adding more units will compound the problem, can't park on week-ends. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. 6 City of Burlingome Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 Commission comment: there is an utility easement behind this property, can it be used for additional parking? CE noted these areas are hard to access, full of utilities, must be accessible at all times, do not use even in public parking lots. There are a number of issues which the architect needs time to work on, needs to come back with a revised design; would like to see parking plan during construction, how will materials be delivered, location of tradesman parking; residents and business noticed in advance for demolition; project does not need a front setback variance; concerned with parking, stepped down design has effect of lifting the building, needs more common area; variance means a hardship on the property, with a new structure where is the hardship, if going to give an exception need something in retum, affordable housing. C. Auran moved to deny this application without prejudice. Seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: would you consider continuing this item to give the applicant a chance to respond? Maker and second agreed to amend the motion to a continue the item. Additional comments: sensible to have parking belowthe grade, lowers the mass; building needs to read as if it is at street level, parking a little lower is OK; moderate income housing is $400,000 staffnoted this varies by county. CA noted that owner does not need to sell the affordable unit it could be a permanent rental managed by an outside agency. Concerned about the towers, prefer to lift the building to grade, would like more open space, if accommodate front setback eliminate variance existing open space is OKay. Mass and bulk is an issue, if address could support application for a variance since setback is similar to existing on block, raising the building would make it apart of the street pattem. Add street trees to the elevation. 5. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this time to the item when revisions have been submitted and reviewed by staff. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent) voice vote. The continuance applies to the Tentative Map application as well. This item concluded at 9:00 p.m. 1344 BURLINGAME AVENUE - ZONED C.1, SUBAREA A _ APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR SIGN HEIGHT FOR A NEW WALL SIGN (ALAN FORD, C/O FLUORESCO, APPLICANT; CHANDLER SIGNS, DESIGNER; NAGHI HATAMI, PROPERTY owNER) (46 NOTICED) PROJECT PI,ANNER:CATHERINE KEYI,ON Reference staff report,04.08.02,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Staff noted that this was a resubmittal and no changes had been made to the project. Four conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Alan Ford, 1290 Waterfall Way, Concord and Doug Hallen, Chandler Sign Company representing the applicant owner of Lucky Brand Jeans store presented the project. Have not installed the sign on the transom, it is difficult to illuminate but not impossible; that sign is the same as the one proposing on the wall2'-4" higher; prefer the sign higher on the building it will look better and it will be easier to illuminate; the visibility ofthe store is poor with the present sign, critical to add a sign to the front of the store someplace; brought a letter "L" which is the largest on the sign, open neon, for commission to see, plugged it in . Can put a Plexiglas cover over open neon to diffuse light, reduce brightness; can also ask client about removing sub-copy; the clover is outlined in open neon tubing; pulpose is to distinguish the store. Commission asked how bright is this sign compared to others on the Avenue. Applicant said he did not measure, lots of different signs on Avenue, could cover face so not see neon, would reduce intensity 50-60%. Consider reducing sign size? Could eliminate trademark, smaller letters 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 are only 4 to 5 inches now. Applicant felt principal issue was height, surprised about questions about design. Has applicant thought about removing the blade sign and putting up this wall sign? Most ofthe stores have both kinds, the problem is the design of this store front, useable fascia is over l2feet,hardship is the design of the building, across street don't know where the store is without wall sign. Alternative illumination? Could do a neon halo, not want to place on transom covers and costs more to install. Not all the letters on the blade sign are illuminated. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner discussion: do not see the hardship for a variance, applicant wants an illuminated billboard, have a good sign with store name clearly visible; have lucky on the windows, will see a big neon sign a long distance; if grant this variance other merchants will want the same consideration. Could accept with proper diffusion of light, if applicant can confirm what it would look like, can continue item and have him answer concerns expressed. Commission issues: o Illumination- already have two lit signs, why would more not harm the Avenue, too bright for the Avenue. o Size can be reduced or other sign removed document window signs. . If sign is placed above transom should be because others are have signage above 12 feet. o Can reduce sign and have no illumination . Would like to see the actual brightness of the sign, can that be arranged some how? Could put fabric or paper sign to scale on the wall for a short time as a mock up. Some one made an error in using so much of the square footage allowed over 12' in the blade sign, that is not justification for a variance, do not see hardship, place a sign above the transom but reduce the blade sign size. C. Brownrigg moved to continue this application to give the applicant an opportunity to provide more information and respond to commission's concems. The motion was seconded by C. Boju6s. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item so the applicant can respond to commission's concerns. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:30 p.m. 6. 1881 ROLLINS ROAD - ZONED M-l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND LANDSCAPE VARTANCE FORA GYM USE (TONY LOTTICE AND PATIL FERRARI, APPLICANTS; TAMARA ICARDI DESIGNS, DESIGNER; SJ AMOROSO PROPERTIES CO., PROPERTY OWNER) ae PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON Reference staff report,04.08.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and Planning Department comments. Seven conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if building was built before the 600/o front setback landscaping was required; yes. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Tony Lottice, applicant and Josh Amoroso, properly owner, were present to answer questions, noted that he tried to address the Commission's concems. Commission asked the applicant to provide a landscape plan, plan does not show irrigation or species ofplants and trees, 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 hard to tell what is being proposed; Planner Hurin noted that staffdirected the applicant to generally show the landscape ilsas and trees; property owner noted that a landscape company currently maintains the site landscaping; Commission noted that a landscape variance is difficultto grant and is opposed to it, asked if additional trees could be planted at the front, some paving could be removed to add some trees. Applicant noted that he did not want to take away parking spaces or affect on.site truck maneuvering by adding landscaping, also needs parking spaces when space in middle building is leased; Commission zuggested that large trees or shrubs be planted instead of a lawn at the front, the use is appropriate for this site but would like to see additional landscaping. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Boju6s noted that because of the layout of buildings on this site and the limitations it creates, moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped March 29,2002, site plan and floor plan; 2) thatthe gym shall operate as indicated in the application dated stamped March 13, 2002, with hours of operation from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week, and no more than 4 employees; the gym shall be used for basketball only, any change to the operation ofthe business, including expanding hours of operations or services offered shall be broughtto the Burlingame Planning Commission for approval; 3) thatl,772 SF of landscaping in the front setback area and 12,688 SF of total on-site landscaping shall be property maintained and inigated; 4) that two 24-inch box size large scale trees, selected from the City's Offrcial Tree List, shall be planted within the front setback area; 5) that the landscape variance shall become void if there is any expansion to the existing of the buildings on site or if any of the buildings are removed; 6) that the conditions of Chief Building Official's February 26,2002 memo shall be met;7) that there shall be no more than 30 people (including staff and parents) on-site atarry one time; 8) that the applicant shall purchase and maintain dailS more often if necessary, trash receptacles on-site which will be placed by the door in front ofthe gym; 9) that all existing and proposed landscape areas will be irrigated regularly and will require ongoing maintenance including weed control and replacement of plant materials as necessary to maintain the landscape design; and l0) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: two trees to be planted in the front setback should beZ4-inchbox size of a larger scale to fill in the space, trees should be selected from the City's official tree list, feel that more landscaping should be added so that a variance is not required, could remove some asphalt and add trees, currently working on specific area plan for this area, landscape variance will affect what is trying to be accomplished by the specific area plan; landscaping could be added to a triangular area adjacent to space #80, but in many cases there is a shortage of parking, will need parking spaces if another use is added in vacant building, reluctant to remove parking for trees, there is not enough area to add enough landscaping to offset the variance, would like to see the variance eliminated, could add a planter bed in front of spaces #80-85 and next to space #79; need to consult with Bekins before adding trees, would not want to plant trees and then have them run over by trucks, could be a problem; should consider irrigation, will be difficult to irrigate small isolated landscape areas, this is a pre-existing condition, not opposed to variance. CP noted that a condition could be added that the variance is void if the buildings are demolished; this is a good idea, landscape variance will become void if there is any expansion to the envelope or removal of any building. The maker and second of the motion agreed adding these conditions. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:55 p.m. 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 330 CLARENDON ROAD _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AS S OCI,ATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; JERRY AND JORDANA PEIL, PROPERTY OWNERS (69 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CA KEYLON 7 Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, 1351 Laurel Street, San Carlos, and Jerry and Jordan Peil, property owners, were present to answer questions; architect noted that this is a straight forward addition with no variances; property owner noted he talked to neighbors about the proposed addition before hiring an architect, provided a petition signed by the neighbors in support; Commissioner suggested that the washer and dryer be moved from the garage to the house, owners agreed with the suggestion; architect noted that all windows will match and will use traditional wood stucco mold trim and wood windows as shown on the plans. David Jonson, 336 Clarendon Road, noted that he objects to the project, has a small house and small rear yard, second story will look into his yard, bedroom and kitchen, concemed with loss ofprivacy, will devalue his property, does not object to a second story addition if it was built within the existing footprint, understands their need to accommodate a growing family but can be done without invading his privacy, concemed about windows on the second floor, will look into his bedroom. Jim Steiner,326 Clarendon Road, and John Parkin, 333 Dwight Road, spoke in favor of the project, noted that the owners spoke to him about the addition, design is tasteful, architect has worked on many other houses in the neighborhood, likes the design since it will help to reduce wind and noise, will increase property value, large trees at rear yard will screen the addition, project is not overdone. Property owner noted that landscaping will be added to help screen the addition and add privacy, has existing windows on the left side already facing the neighbor, have happily co-existed for several years. The Commission had the following comments and concerns to be addressed by the applicant and noted on the plans: Move the dryer/washer from the garage to the inside ofthe house, will eliminate the nonconforming width dimension in the garage; Add a window in the second floor master bathroom on the left side elevation to eliminate the blank wall, consider using obscure glass; and Should strengthen landscaping by adding larger size shrubs or trees on each side of the house, will help to screen the addition and provide privacy. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. a a 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 C. Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the suggested revisions have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded C. Auran. Comment on motion: this is a good example, in regards to privacy this is not a hillside area construction permit and therefore no views are affected, Burlingame lots are small, all neighbors have to deal with privacy by using blinds, curtains, shutters, etc., design is appropriate, property owner has a right to build a second story addition ifit is in scale, suggested that this project be placed on the consent calendar. The maker and second of the motion agreed to place this item on the consent calendar. Comment on the motion: might consider swapping the master bedroom and study room to reduce the impact on the neighbor, addition at this location has the least impact, privacy is not in the Commission's purview, but appropriate landscaping will be effective. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Keele absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:25 p.m. 8.1540 HOWARD AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; EARL GUSTAFSON, PROPERTY OWNER (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: SEAN O'ROURKE Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. John Stewart, l35l Laurel Street, San Carlos, and Earl Gustafson, property owner, were present to answer questions, noted that the property owner talked to the neighbors regarding the addition, submitted a petition signed by neighbors in support of the project. The Commission had the following comments and concerns to be addressed by the applicant and noted on the plans: Concemed with left side elevation, suggested that the applicant consider adding more than a belly band for articulation along this side; Only one bay window on the left side elevation breaks up the structure horizontally, architect should study the left side elevation more; and Suggest planting trees in smaller containers, they will grow faster. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Boju6s noted that the architect has done a nice job with the design and made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. a a a 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plals had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Keele absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:31 p.m. 9. 1537 DRAKE AVENUE - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGENCE OF THREE PARCELS, DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT FOR TWO HOUSES AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR ONE HOUSE TO CONSTRUCT THREE NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH DETACHED GARAGES (OTTO MILLER, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; PROJECT PLA CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked: the environmental review should address events during construction; can staff get information on the existing setbacks, square footage etc. of the development on the site now; the arborist should address the rooting in the driveway for the middle house proposed, this should be evaluated and necessary mitigation proposed. There were no other questions from the commission. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Michael Kendal and James Chu architect, and Otto Miller, propertyowner,representedtheproject. Theypresentedarenderingoftheproject,asbuilt,brieflyreviewed the findings of the arborist's report, noting that they had worked around the redwood trees and still developed a house within the city's guidelines. They noted the large number of new trees they were proposing to add to each lot. The existing house is 4500 SF with a number of support structures, it will be replaced by three houses within the style of Burlingame. Between December 4 andJanuary 4,2002,they contacted all the neighbors, they will address all the environmental issues; the encroachments of the proposed houses are caused by the design, they are eliminating two on street parking spaces and adding two driveways. Commissioners asked the applicant: how long do you anticipate construction taking? About 6 to 9 months, all three houses will be built at one time; anticipate parking problem and neighborhood impact so going to do all construction at one time, can do some staging on site after rough grading, also park in front yards during construction. Need to address sewer and water problems on Drake. CE noted that there have been some recent improvements made and the city will need to do long term maintenance, can address in the environmental document. Chairman Vistica asked the public to comment: Liz Valardi, 1540 Drake; Natalie Taylor, 1566 Drake; Mark Thomas, 1520 Drake; Jenna O'Neil, 1516 Drake; Margaret Whipler, 1535 Drake; Jay Garcia,156l Drake; Dave Taylor,1566 Drake spoke. Problem is the addition of three houses in place of one existing at the narrow end of the street, will increase traffic, cars will not be parked in the garages, live across street have enjoyed the openness of the three lots with only one house, now have to endure 9 months of port-a- potties on the front lawn, with three postage stamp front yard across the street in the end. This is a dead end street, not a cul-de-sac, there is no bulb at the end for turning; need to listen to neighbors concems; concemed about public health, the sewer on Drake over flows regulmly into the storm drain which flows into the creek; city did repair four laterals recently, don't know yet if that was a band aid or the solution, this development would add two more laterals, want to be sure that this increase in sewage will not cause existing houses problem or impact Mills Creek. Proposed houses are 106 feet from Mills Creek, if within JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (60 NOTICED) ERIKA LEWIT t2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 200 feet of a creek need special permit from Fish and Game, this should be investigate; will increase impervious coverage with this project, water will run into storm drain, is the drain size sufficient so that there will be no flooding of existing houses; there should be no construction debris in the creek; all property owners on the street need unobstructed access to their houses at all times during construction, no material should be stored or staged in the street; construction hours should be strictly limited and no construction should occur at night or on Saturday and Sunday, there should be no noise and no vibration; with five bedrooms these houses are not consistent in size with other houses in the neighborhood, should stay design review until the environmental issues are resolved. There are22 structures on the stree! the median number of bedrooms zlmong them is about 3, this proposal exceeds the historic use of a single family house and swimming pool. Four on street parking spaces will be lost to three driveways; the increase in parking demand will be 12 cars, since people do not use their garages for parking there will be a net loss of 4 parking spaces with loss on street. Redwood trees are shallowrooted and easilyharmed byexcavation. The height variances will affect the sun light to current residents; the infrastructure in the street will not support 3 more houses, water pressure will be low and there is only one fire hydrant and it is at the end of the block. The dead end street emphasizes the character of this street of small houses, it increases the sense of privacy. Believe that recent trimming of the redwoods took out more that then allowed3}yo,who will monitor any protection measures established; many people and delivery vans needing to turn in the dead end street use the existing wider driveway serving the house, how will they do this when three smaller driveways are in place; how many toilets, sinks, fixtures and chimneys will be added; can the site be re-divided into two lots? Does not seem correct to require only one covered parking space for a four bedroom house, does the building code allow this. How will the construction area be made safe for the children during demolition and construction. If equipment or material are staged in the street the developer should be financially penalized each time a violation occurs; the developer should have to post a bond for three years to guarantee construction according to approved plans; there should be only two houses with three covered parking spaces on site for each. Although it is signed by the property owner as being accurate, the environmental disclosure form does not seem to address all the existing environmental issues, there is a school 206 feetfrom the site; there is a storm drain 50 feet from the site, project will affect the drainage pattern in the area by adding so much impervious surface. CA Anderson noted commission should delay design review until know that the environmental document will not require the houses to be moved. Applicant responded that he has tried to involve the property owners in the process, and as property owner he has property rights. Have a number of specialists who have been involved in the project so far, am asking to replace one house and add two new ones. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. Commissioners comment: in addition to items mentioned the following environmental issues need to be addressed: o Sewer and storm drain capacity and condition;o Management of construction debris and drainage during construction; ' Developer needs to prepare a parking plan to address how material will be delivered to the site so that the street can be kept clear; o The city's hours of construction should be confirmed, how are they enforced during construction;o Does the location ofthe creek within 200 feet ofthe site require special environmental analysis, if so it should be done; o Parking impacts during construction should be addressed and plan evaluated;o Environmental analysis should address the impacts with two lots as well as with the 3 lots requested; 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 o What will be the change in water consumption and sewage generation, is there supply, distribution and collection capacity, what will need to be done as a result of the project; o Environmental effect of all three proposed houses being built to the maximum, or more, ofthe code allowances, particularly FAR; . All the issues identified in the neighbors' letters should be addressed in the environmental analysis;o Environmental analysis should be done then the project reviewed for design; o Tree protection should be detailed, including the driveway ofthe middle house; and atreeprotection plan developed; o Would like environmental evaluation to include two houses, two car garages for all houses (three); . Review the heights, all lots are flat, houses are together so they become more visually prominent;. Since use (number of houses) is an environmental issue, it is too early to comment on design;o Potential for sewer system over flow needs to be addressed before design review; ando Requirements of NPDES need to be addressed. Staffwas directed to prepare an environmental evaluation based on the oral and written comments received. CA Anderson noted that can't determine design review until see environmental data sending the project to a design reviewer too soon could cause confusion. CP Monroe noted that when the environmental review is completed and the project is ready for design review, the city will renotice the property owners for a design review study with public comment opportunity. This item concluded at 1l:35 p.m. 10.1205 BURLTNGAME AYENUE - ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A-APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND VARI,ANCE FOR NUMBER OF SIGNS AND SIGN HEIGHT (SEPHORA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, APPLICANT; THOMAS BOND, THOMAS BOND & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT; KARP FAMILY TRUST, PROBERTY OWNER) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYI,ON CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked about the plans noting that the presentation of the blade signs was confusing, could this be clarified before the project returns, Could the height of the signs be clarified and how parts are measured, a clearer presentation would be helpful, for example, which parts of the signs are between 12' and24'. Staffnoted that because of the fact that the two businesses overlap primary and secondary frontages for signage, this is a difficult application to present. Staff will take another look at presentation approach. Chairman Vistica opened the public comment. Thomas Bond, 14471Chambers Road, Tustin, represented the project. He showed a rendering of the blade signs, noting that there is a blade sign on each frontage, the awning sign is on the primary frontage; on the secondary frontage there are two plaques one in each arch. The intent of the design is to bring Saphora onto the street; the front ofthe store will be redone and the entire building repainted; they will close all the windows at the rear. The basement will be accessed only from the hotel space. The intent ofthe signage program was to provide signage to cars and pedestrians, the blades are needed by the pedestrians, the awning announces the nature ofthe business. Do not want the signs higher on the building elevation, but the design of the structure dictates a natural location, want the keep the clear story windows which go to 14 feet, have an open ceiling inside, so the sign band is the only place to put the signs. The lighting of the signs will be will low voltage fixtures over each letter, on the secondary frontage three fixtures will be enough to light the 7 feet of signage; the fixtures will extend 4 inches and have a 50 watt bulb. t4 City of Burlingame Plonning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 Commissioners asked: if the sign on the primary frontage were l5 inches smaller it would not need a sign variance for height (that's 8 percent less). Applicant noted that they would be glad to reduce by \o/oto avoid a variance. Can something creative be done in the two arches on the secondary frontage. Have you considered keeping the arched windows (at clear story), they are integral to the existing building. Applicant noted that these windows are 80 years old, wooden, and require a lot of maintenance, ifthey are not reglazed they will leak; would prefer a cleaner look more consistent with tenant. There seem to be a lot of pigeons, would removal of these wooden arched windows reduce the number. Applicant noted that with proposed design they would remove all the bird wire which was place to discourage the pigeons. Are the blade signs lit? No. Commercial design guidelines support retaining features which are integral to the fagade of the building, the arched windows are integral, these features work together- see commercial design review item 5; more concerned with fitting Burlingame than Sephora. Applicant noted that he felt that retaining the arched wooden muntins was subjective and he has not seen the Commercial design guidelines; tenant not adamantly opposed to the windows, if in view of commission it is important to retain arched look would evaluate keeping them, wanted to get rid of recessed areas which the birds like. The arches should be tied in, can be done by matching fenestration of the existing windows. What is entry finish? Black granite at the base with lighter stone above. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C. Keighran moved that the applicant seems to understand the issues and he should make the revisions discussed and come back to an action meeting. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: sunmary of the revisions needed: o Eliminate the signage variance for signage between 12' and24' ontheprimary frontage, reduce the sign from 42 SF to 39 SF; . Keep the integrity of the exterior architecture including wooden window inserts at clerestory, provide detailed information on the window wall system; o Provide a profile of the mullion to be used, also in the arches; and. Clariry the presentation of the signage request by frontage. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to put this item on the regular action calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Keele absent). The Planning Commission action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at l2:15 p.m. X. PLANNERREPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of April 1,2002. CP Monroe reviewed the actions at the regular council meeting on April 1,2002. She also reviewed, briefly, the high points of the Council's special meeting on the budget status on March 28,2002. She noted that the loss of revenue in FY 2001-2002 would affect the capital improvements budget for FY 2002-2003 as well as the operating budget for the Planning Department for the next Fiscal Year. 15 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 8, 2002 FYI - Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1532 Burlingame Avenue The commissioners reviewed the request to adjust windows and approved the changes. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Vistica adjoumed the meeting in memory of Commissioner Keele's mother who passed away on Sunday. The commissioners noted the moment. The meeting adjoumed at12:35 a.m.. Respectfu lly submitted, Joe Boju6s, Secretary uNAPPRovEDNan rurss4. 8 16 CITY OF BURLINGAME BAILDING INSPECTION IJAST YEAR TO DATE TEIS YEAR TO DATE * Valuation 2 $800, ooo 0 $0 2 948, ooo 90 i3,720,3L4 21 $11,81-3,591 L2 $19,500 3 $45,000 8 s23,200 0$0 45 $604,002 13 $56, 050 15 $82,007 24 s664,7L8 MONTIILY PERMIT ACTIVITY MARCH, zOW PermiE tIZI)e New Single Family New Multi-Family New commercial Alterations-Res Alterations-NonRes DemoliEion Swimming Pool Sign Permits Fences Reroofing Repairs Window Repl Miscelfaneous IEXS I.TONTE # valuaEion 2 $800, ooo 0 $0 0 $0 30 $903,464 7 $393,636 4 $7,500 L $18,500 4 $15, 9oo 0$0 L2 $160,233 3 $1-1, 5oo 4 $22,9]-7 7 $98, o8o IJA9T UONTE SAI{E IrlONlE IJAST YEAR # 0 0 1 35 5 3 0 4 0 11 1 7 7 Valuation $o $o $36, o0o iL,362,2OO $13 9, 610 $2, Ooo $o $7, 3oo $o $134,433 $1, 850 $42,284 $274,638 Valuation $375, 000 $o $o SL, o44 , L64 $i., 155, ooo $25, 5oo $o $2, 000 $o $183,170 $47,800 s6o, 211 iL64 ,962 VaLuat,ion i947,]-50 $o $2, og5, ooo $2 ,669 , glz i2,697,25O $37, 500 $22 , s3B $28 ,253 $o $46L,239 $60, 6Oo $118,340 $529, 871 BISCN. YEAR TO DATE VaLuatiou $3 ,410, ooo $o $ro,14g, ooo $9, 319, L23 #LG ,728 , 499 $58, 5oo $67,000 i64,025 $0, zoo #2, oB7 , eg9 $74, L5o $313,858 $l ,275 ,947 # 1 0 0 ,.7 6 3 0 1 0 19 7 8 7 * 3 0 2 58 20 I 1 I 0 48 10 L4 31 # 10 0 6 230 5L 39 4 18 2 175 2L 46 56 TOTAI,S 74 i2,43L,73O '74 $2,000,315 79 $3,057,807 236 $L7,8'76,382 2L3 $9,557,558 668 $43,553,701 4/ 07/ 02 7 :36:52 I lnvestments Par CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31,2002 Market Value Book Value o/c oI Portfolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equlv.Value LAIF & County Pool CORP NOTES Federal Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 14,577,954.7A 3,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 14,577,954.76 3,063,750.00 13,110,610.00 14,577,954.76 3,027,780.00 13,000,000.00 47.63 9.89 42.48 1 1,596 1,700 1 486 1,251 3,271 5.929 5.354 3.317 6.0'rl 5.428 4.48030,577,954.76 30,752,314.76 30,605,734.76 100.00%880 580 4.419 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Curent Year Average Dally Balance Effectlve Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, RAHN A. BECKER, FINANCE DIR.iTREASURER 123,397.74 1,311,031.53 32,416,548.53 34,717,674.01 4.48% 5.03% sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Totial funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:04/'10/2002 - 09:40 \ 4 ro/o*-----1----/-- CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Details . lnvestments March 31,2002 Purchase Date Stated Book Value Rate Moody's Page2 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Average Balance Par Value Market Value YTM Days to 365 Maturity Maturlty Date LAIF & Gounty Pool 77 79 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. S M COUNTY POOL 7,416,001 .33 7,161,953.43 7,416,00't.33 7,16 t,953.43 7,416,00 t.33 7,161,953.43 2.850 3.800 2.850 3.800 Subtotal and Average 14,646,833.04 't4,577,5il.7A 14,577,554.78 14,577,554.76 3,317 CORP NOTES 0739028M9 37042R2C5 487 489 BEAR STEARNS CORP GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP 03/021999 o4l20t19Sg 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,055,000.00 1,008,750.00 1,997,500.00 1,030,280.00 6.1 50 6.750 6.1 79 5.685 701 03t022004 70 06t10t2002 Subtotal and Average 3,027,780.00 3,000,000.00 3,063,7s0.00 3,027,780.00 6.011 .AB Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 313311KK3 499 3133M3TS4 476 3133Mry75 488 3133MF209 498 3133MLMH5 505 3136F0Y29 502 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FANNIE MAE Subtotal and Average 06/13/2001 o3117t1958 0312a1959 05t24t2001 02126t2002 0812E12001 2,000,000.00 1,000,000,00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,011,880.00 1,028,750.00 2,075,620.00 2,007,500.00 1,979,380.00 4,007,480.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5.800 6.020 6.000 5.630 4.000 5.420 5.E00 6.020 6.000 5.630 4.002 5.420 1,534 350 721 1,514 970 1 ,610 06/13/2006 03117t2003 03/222004 o5124t2006 1112612004 08t28t2006 14,741,535.&13,000,000.00 13,1 10,610.00 't3,000,000.00 5.428 1,251 Run Date: o4t10t2002 - 09:40 Total lnvestments and Average 32,416,548.53 30,577,954.76 30,752,314.7A 30,605,734.76 4.480 580 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f 1 1 I I CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type March 1,2002 through March 31,2002 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Beglnning Balance Stated Rate Transaction Date Purchasas or Depo3lts Sales/Maturlties or Wlthdrawals Ending Balance Page 3 LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary) 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.79 S M COUNTYPOOL Subtotal 2.850 3.800 0.00 303,580.22 500,000.00 0.00 14,7743A8.il 303,586.22 500,000.00 14,s77,9U.7A CORP NOTES Subtotal 3,027,780.00 3,027,780.00 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 3133MHJ62 504 0.00 2,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal 5.550 03t28t2002 I 5,000,000,00 0.00 2,000,000.00 13,000,000,00 Total 32,E02,14/,.9 303,s86.22 2,500,000.00 30,605,734.76 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/'10/2002 . 09:40 \ Month GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnvestment Activity Summary March 2001 through March 2002 Yleld to Maturity 360 Equlvalent Equlvalent Managed Pool365 Number of Securltles Purchased Number of Securlties Matured / Sold Page 4 Average Days to MaturityEndYear Number of Securltles Total lnvostod Rate Avorage Term 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 200,1 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 15 14 14 13 15 14 15 12 12 12 11 11 10 34,010,zil.54 37,255,372.54 38,758,088.25 36,085,177.06 38,447,819.42 38,002,',167.12 34,930,381.22 32,614,594.78 33,056,179.95 35,671,743.12 34,732,791.56 32,802,148.54 30,605,734.76 5.963 5.737 5.609 5.431 5.396 5.287 5.352 4.880 4.812 4.629 4.497 4.441 4.419 6.046 5.817 5.687 5,507 5.471 5.361 5.426 4.948 4.879 4.694 4.559 4,503 4.480 s.869 5.417 5.200 4.767 4.632 4.4U 4.214 3.809 3.683 3.474 3.232 3.237 3.317 998 931 948 989 1,047 1,089 1,289 1,028 1,014 940 928 933 880 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 2 1 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 I 1 1 688 671 695 764 817 860 ,020 791 763 691 662 658 580 RJn Dare: 04/1b/2002 - 09:40 Average 13 3s,151,727.91 5.1120/o 5.183%4.257 1 I,001 743 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept V5.02f t March April May June July August September October November D6camber January February March 1 a GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Distribution of lnvestments By Type March 2001 through March 2002 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 Page 5 Average by Perlod March 2001 MayApril June 2001 July 2001 August September 2001 2001 October November December 2001 2001 2001lnvestmenl Type 2001 2001 LAIF & Gounty Pool 36,9 42.4 41 .9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 45.0 47 .6 41 .1Yo Gertificates of Deposit. Bank Certificates of Deposit. S & L Certificates of Deposit.Thrift & Ln Negotiable CD's - Bank CORP NOTES 8.9 8.1 7,8 E.4 7.9 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 9.9 8.7% Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper - lnterest Bearing Commercial Paper . Discount Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 54.2 49.5 50.3 5't.3 55.9 53.9 UA 49.1 48.4 44.9 43.2 45.7 42.5 50.3% Federal Agency lssues - Discount Treasury Securities - Goupon Treasury Securities . Dlscount MiscellanEous Securities - Goupon Miscellaneous Securities . Discount Non lntersst Bearing lnvestments Mortgage Backed Securities Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 2 Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM5) SymRept V5.02fRun Date:04/102002 - 09:40 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnterest Earnings Summary March 31,2002 March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Page 6 GD/Coupon/Discount lnvestments : lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period lnterest Earned during Period Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Eamings during Period ( 207,100,00 151,173.33 275,273.32) 0.00) 1,083,150.00 151,173.33 337,083.33) 0,00) E3,000.01 0.00 897,240.00 1,250.00 83,000.01 898,490.00 Pass Through Securitiesl lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period lnterest Earned during Period Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Earnings during Period 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period lnterest Earned during Period 0.00 396,614.35 356,216.62)( 441,647.29 396,614.35 425,720.11) 40,397.73 412,541,53 Total lnterest Earned during Period Total Gapltal Galns or Losses 123,397.74 0.00 1,309,781.53 1,250.00 , Total Earnings during Perlod 123,397.74 1,311,031.53 Run Date: 01'1S/2002 - 09:40 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRr_PM6) SymRept V5.02f ( ( ( ( ( ( Par 95BD Portfolio Management Porffolio Summary March 31,2002 Mark6t Value Book Value Yo ot Portfollo Term Days to Maturlty YTM 380 Egulv, YTM 365 Equlv,lnvestm€nts Value Federal Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 100.00 1,756 532 532 4.995 4.995 5.064 800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 5.064 Total Earnlngs March 31 Month Endins Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Dally Balance Effective Rate of Return Rahn Becker, Finance Director/Treasurer l/ta/oz 3,416.66 802,000,00 5.02% 30,750.00 802,000.00 5.11o/o Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Bu rlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and is restricted by law (e.9, Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PMl ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/1 0/2002 - 09:47 95BD Portfolio Management Porffolio Details . lnvestments March 31,2002 Purchase Oate Par Value Page 2 GUSIP lnvestment# lssuer Average Balance Market Value Stated BookValue Rate YTM Days to 365 Maturity Maturity Date LAIF 79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD.0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.7A7 Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 3133M5Q89 11t24t1998 800,000.00 819,248.00 802,000.00 5.12548sFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 819,2r8,00 802,000.00 5.064 532 09t15t2003 5.064 532 Total lnvestments and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 8,l9,2r4.00 802,000.00 5,064 532 Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 04l7Pl20OZ - 09:47 r lnvestments Par 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31,2002 Mark6t Value Book Value %ol Portfollo Term Days to Maturity YTM YTM 360 Equlv. 365 Equlv,Value Federal Agency Coupon Securities lnvestments 1,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1 ,710,000.00 100.00 1,826 359 5.977 5.977 6.060 1,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1,7'10,000.00 100.00% 1,826 359 5.060 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Cunent Year Average Dally Balance Effective Rate of Return 8,846.04 1,710,000.00 6.09% 78,001.09 1,710,000.00 6.08% requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). Pursuant to Stalp law,*"'W/t RAHN BECKER, Finance Directorffreasurer Portfolio 98BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 04/10/2002 - 09:48 I q/s , cusrP lnvestment# lssuer Average Balance 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments March 31,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Stated Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value YTM Daysto 305 Maturity Page 2 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 80 LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.000 0 Federal Agency Coupon Securitios 3133M3XEO 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal and Averag€ 03/26/1 998 1 ,710,000.00 1,760,769.90 1 ,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 359 03/26/2003 6.060 35S1,7{ 0,000.00 1,7't 0,000.00 1,700,769.90 1,710,000.00 Total lnvestments and Average 1,710,000,00 1,710,000.00 1,780,769.90 1,710,000.00 6.060 359 Portfolio 98BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRr.sj Oate: 04/10/2002 - 09:48 I I lnvestm6nts Par 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31,2002 Market Value Book Value o/t ot Portfollo Term Days to Maturlty YTM 380 Equlv, YTM 365 Equlv.Value Managed Pool Accounts Federal Agency Coupon Securities lnvestments 9,898,520.33 1,100,000.00 I,E96,520.33 1,1 04,125.00 9,898,520.33 1,100,000,00 90.00 10.00 1 1,826 '1,597 2,811 5.474 2.850 5.550 10,998,520.33 1'l,002,645.33 10,998,520.33 100.00%'t84 161 3.077 3.120 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Cunent Year Average Dally Balance Effective Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, there are Rahn A. Becker, Finance Dir./Treasurer 29,863.53 3't8,658,58 11,242,391.30 3.13% available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and tunds). Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.O2fRun Date: 04/10/2002 . lO:35 Fiscal Year To Date 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details . lnvestments March 31,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Page 2 Average Balance Market Value Stated BookValue Rate YTM Days to 365 Maturlty YTM Maturity Date360CUSIPlnveslment f lssuer Managed Pool Accounts 81 08/09/2001 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.s3Local Agency lnv. Fd Subtotal and Average 9,898,520.33 2.850 2.811 2.850 10,'t42,391.30 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.33 9,898,520.33 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133MGQR0 503 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Average o8l't5t2001 '1,',l00,000.00 1,104,125.O0 1,100,000.00 5.550 5.474 5.550 1,597 08/15/2006 1,100,000.00 5.q4 5.550 1,5971,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,104,125.00 Run Date: 04/1012002. 10:35 4' Total lnvostments and Average 11,242,351,30 10,998,520.33 11,002,645.33 10,908,520,33 3.077 3.120 {6{ Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SyrnRept V5.02f 'a 2.811 2.8s0 1 D //urr.' ",Vfiy M"nuge, d City Attomey i.'1 pir. Finance F/City planner ISTRIBUTTON: please iespond tr No Response Required March 23rd,2002 Burlingame City Council Burlingame City Hall Primrose and Bellevue Burlingame, California 9, il Dir. Public Works li Hunran Resources . Police Chief Fire Chiel r Parks & Rec Liblarian RECEIVED MAR 2 s 20r,2 trsFHlfii,flEl'fiE On Next Agenda PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK Re: Safeway, Walgreens and Wells Fargo It is difficult to understand the arguments against the Safeway plans for the new storebuilding for Safeway, Walgreens and Wells Fargo Some have suggested the Burlingame Avenue is a feeling that must be retained and is lacking in the latest plans... What do they mean? The Pacific Bell Bldg. that has been closed since 1996 is better or the Bank at the corner of Park and Burlingame still closed and not bringing any increased business to the street. Or, maybe they prefer all of the new national chain stores that have moved into the area and taken over much of Burlingame Ave. If this is true what is their complaint about the plans for Safeway.? Wallgreens and Safeway have been, and will continue to be, the two stores on the designated area... No change. Wells Fargo Bank will return to the center. The delivery area will be offthe street .. No change The Fox Lane widened to provide three travel lanes and a dedicated loading area for Burlingame Merchants, and a sidewalk.. Thus, helping to eliminate some of the congestion on Burlingame Ave. due to delivery to small stores on that street. Right lane entry and departure on El camino opposite Ralston Ave. Thus improving traffic flow into the parking area. Installation oftraffc signal at Primrose and Howard.. Much more attractive parking area in front of walgreens, Safeway and wells Fargo facing El camino. Elimination of the old wells Fargo building and more attractive front with a variety oftrees and shrubbery planted. Building facing Primrose will house small retail space to be filled by new tenant. This new plan will house wallgreens, wells Fargo Banrq Safeway and additional small retail space facing Primrose. Besides the fact that Safeway is a reasonably priced and well managed grocery store and the need for so many to have a store of this caliber in the immediate area should be a powerful reason for the City to approve the existing plan as soon as possible... There are many elderly and young people who depend on Safeway in this area. For through. sake put it Honorable MaryJanney City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame 94010 Dear Madame Mayor, I'm writing regarding Safeway's latest proposal to replace its present store, Walgreen's and the empty Wells Fargo branch by building a superstore/distribution center. The proposal I've seen, Burlingame Safeway Draft EIR 1201260, concerns me because it's so badly out of scale with the surrounding area. It looks like an 800 lb. gorilla that would be more at home next to a freeway. I'm unfamiliar both with Safeway's rationale for this monster or with the Planning Commission's position, but no matter how Safeway's architects try to fluffup the facade, they're asking the people of Burlingsme to allow a sea-change in the style and ambiance of the Burlingame Avenue shopping district. Specifrcally, the proposal to have a blank wall out to Howard Ave. bothers me, as do what amounts basically to another blank wall out to Primrose Rd., the entrance from the small sea of parking inside this new commercial nucleus, and the use of Fox Plaza Ln. to service the fleet of home delivery vehicles. Regardless of the aesthetics, I don't think it would take long for the new site to become a cyst of relentless truck traffic in a narrow lane with little --or no-- accomodation for pedestrians. Moreover, the design discourages foot traffic between Burlingame Avenue and this new shopping center. The design ensures that it's got nothing to do with Burlinggms, but allowing it in this configuration would negatively affect the downtown shopping district for mzrny years. Please don't suppori it; the residents of Burlingame will applaud your good sense today and your regard for Burlingame tomorrow. g"L^ ,r'A $*"itt" 0^A"""* rcz 9l,,aA^ll g.,a RECEIVED g*rl;rrfrr*, Q^l;{^"^;* 9+040 MAR Z ? Z0r,Z March 24th, zooz 8,,#8F'dl[i,fi8[,fiE Sincerely, 71" &,/ar,,Cccucno? John Anderson Page 1 of 1 PWENG-Bagdon, George To: COUNCIL-Baylock,Cathy;COUNGIL-O'MahonyRosalie Cc: MGR-Nantell, Jim Subject: FW: Broadway Streetscape - 1100 block temporary pedestrain Dear Cathy and Rosalie, I know both of you have received complaints about the Broadway Streetscape project recently. My staff has tried to make the best of an unfortunate situation by working with the contractor to provide more access for the businesses during the Easter weekend. Hopefully we can get the sidewalk paved early this week. My special thanks goes out to our inspectors, Bill Lowrie and his brother Mikkelwho consistently place a priority on customer service as discussed below: ----Original Message---- From: purilens appliance problems [mailto:smokie_the_cat@hoUnail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 30,2002 LT:MPM To: blowrie@burlingame.org Cc: sMurtuza@burlingame.org; PMonaghan@burlingame.org; MLowrie@burlingame.org; GBagdon @burlingame.org Subject: Broadway Streetscape - 1100 block temporary pedestrain acces HIBiII- Thank you for all your help on Fdday, March 29. I appreciated you taking the time to visit the nerchants with me, to hand out the construclion update flyer. You also listened to the merctanb complaints and came up with a plan of action. You called the Corporation Yard and got two follc to come help that afremoon. You also called your brother, Mick and he dropped what he was doing to cone the help. Some temprary ramps with signs were installed to each business and to proride through pedesbian access along the 1100 block. We added one hour parking signs to eliminate long term parking that was occuning because the parking meters were removed witfi the demolition. With the help of the Police Department this will be enforced for the next week. Your assertiveness helped to get the contractor to take notice and come in on Saturday, March 30 to install some temporary asphalt paving to the front door of each business. You were willing to come in on Saturday nroming to assist the conhactor and his crew with the installation of the ramps. Your quick actions helped to placate the merchants in a very diffi cult situation. This work should have been done two weeks ago by the contactor and not the city, but you were able to take quick action to get it done as soon as possible. Thanks for your help. Jane https://webmail.burlingame.org/exchange/forms/ipm/note/frmroot.asp?command:new&store:0 PS - I drove W 1411 Chapin Avenue Saturday morning and the parking lot paving looked good and was already in use by the merchants behind Maloufs. 3BU2AO2 CLK-Musso Ann From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: PWiENG-Erbacher, Frank Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:33 PM 'BABAUTO@aol.com' CLK-Musso, Ann; PW/ENG-Mortensen, Doris RE: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting April 11,2002 Thank you! lwill forward your comments to the Commission. Frank E ---Original Message---- From: BABAUTO@aol-com [mailto:BABAUTO@aol.com]Sent: Tuesday, Apnl09,2002 2.14 PM To: Ferbacher@burlingame.org Subject: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Meeting April 1 1 ,2002 I am writing to you in connection with the April 11 , 2002, meeting regarding the possibility of eliminating several parking spaces on N. Carolan. Our company, Broadway Auto Body located at 1305 N. Carolan Avenue, has worked and coexisted with the dozen other businesses in this area for the last decade. There have never been enough parking spaces to facilitate everyone's needs but we have worked together to make the best of the situation. Approximately six months ago the tenant who has brought this request to the City began the operation of his business in our area. lt appears that the logistics of his operation were not properly taken into consideration before he picked this location. Since he has moved in, our building (1305/1307/1309 N. Carolan) has already relinquished 4 employee parking stalls in an attempt to ease the congestion caused by the tenant's delivery trucks in the easement between the buildings. This action came after the police were called out on more than one occasion to attempt to resolve disputes between the tenants. Many of the businesses in this area are concerned that, by allowing the current proposal to be implemented, a domino effect is slowly taking place and soon there will be even more limited parking for the various businesses who have existed in this area for years. This is leading to sever congestion of the street brought on by stray customers and employees of different businesses attempting to locate parking spaces. We therefore request that the current proposal to eliminate parking spaces in lieu of a red zone arca on N. Carolan be rejected by the City ofBurlingame. Thank you for your consideration of this information. Sincerely Broadway Auto Body 1 MEMORANDIJM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: APRIL 9,2002 AWARD TO PHIL SCOTT For your information, Phil Scott, the Public Works Superintendent, recently received the 2001 Pomeroy Award from the Califomia Water Environmental Association (CWEA). The organization's mission is to enhance the education and effectiveness of California's wastewater professionals through training, certification and promotion of sound policies. The non-profit volunteer association was established in 1928 and sponsors seminars and hands-on training to help wastewater professionals be more effective in their work. Phil was recognized for his long-standing contributions toward expanding the knowledge and professional development of wastewater collection systems personnel at an awards luncheon on April5, 2002. c: Phil Scott S:\A Public Works Director$Stafi ReportsWemo - PScott Arurd.wpd RE: TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS APRIL 9,2002 RECENT 3OI AIRPORT BOULEVARD SITE ACTIVITIES a o a On March 25, 2002, a demolition permit was issued by the Building Division to R&B Equipment, Inc. to perform demolition work at 301 Airport Boulevard. An encroachment permit was also issued to the contractor which requires complying with the City NPDES regulations, keeping the streets clean, following proper traffic control and repairing any damage to the street pavement. At the time of the encroachment permit issuance, engineering staff indicated to the contractor that any grading operation on site would require a separate grading permit from the Building Division. The following week after the encroachment permit was issued, the contractor was found to not only be performing demolition but also conducting a substantial grading operation without a permit. As a result, on April 4,2002, staff directed the contractor to stop grading operations and take the following actions: apply for a grading permit which requires City approval of a grading plan supported by a geotechnical report file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Board for stormwater discharges resulting from construction activities on the site obtain approval of a stormwater pollution prevention plan from the State Water Resources Board Although the contractor has stopped all grading operations and is now in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals, staff is concerned about the environmental impact of the volume of fill to be placed at the site. Preliminary information received from the contractor indicates that there will be as much as five feet of fill placed above existing ground level. Staff will review this issue carefully upon receipt of the grading application. cc Jim Nantell,Larry Anderson, Meg Monroe Syed Murtuza, Tom McGovern R&B Equipment, [nc. Dan Levin, Owner State Water Resources Board S:\A Public Works Director$Stafi Reports\Memo - Qading 301 Airport Bl.rpd April9,2002 MayorMary Janney City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, Ca 94010 Dear Mayor Janney: This is intended as a note of support to the City Council in the matter of selecting the new members of the Planning Commission. Specifically,we support the decision of the City Council to open to public the new positions for tlie Planning Commission simply because it is the Council's right to use its discretion to appoint people to the Commission who will reflect the general philosophy of the Council.This philosophy has been good for the City of Burlingame, and it merits our approval, our encouragement and our support. Attached, please find the editorial from The Independent, datod March 18,2002. We fully agree with the editorial comments, and we fully support the Council for their wise and timely decisions. Our own past experiences with the Planning Commission have certainly been less than pleasant. The Commission, led by Mr. Stan Vistica, de facto disregarded the formal findings of the architectural review (a body created and administered by the city itself). Furthemore, it disregarded the written and documented findings of other city officials, specifically those from the Parks Department. It, in addition, disregarded the written findings of other certified experts, and it ignored the unanimous letters of support from the local neighbors. In so doing, the Commission cost our project a year in lost time, much aggravation, and it almost led to an aggressive litigation against the City of Burlingame. This was not our vision of a wise admini strative practice. . We feel that there is a need for new faces on the Planning Commission. Hopefully, this will bring parity to the process, even for those of us who have been Burlingame residents and homeowners for more than three decades. Drive 2405 Hillside Drive Burlingame, 94010 PAGE 6A TI{E INDEPENDENT SERVIN( \-.OPn THEINuEPENDENT FronrNcn FaNc Editor JouN T.C. FaNc Publisher Emeritus Jrnnv FucHs Publisher GnrcoRy WarxrNs ManagingEditor appointBes $houlil $harc Gity Gouncil's uision ber to when , intelligent job issues. The Planning HERE ARE rwo openings on the Burlingame Planning Com- mission. The Burlingame City Council has the authority and the right to appoint whatever planning commissioners ,it wants. In every for the council, but it does mean they should share the same goals for Burlingame's future. Jerry Deal's decision . to appear before the Planning Commission and slam members of the City Council for not reappointing Start Vistica and Ann Keighran only confirms the fact that the commission has become a political entiry not an instrument of government concerned with plan- No city stands or falls on the service of any one or two members serving on any board or commission. Burlingame has a strong planning staff that provides anee and direction the kind of guid- for any new mem- on . The Burlingame council would be making a big rnistake if it appointed planning commissioners just because of pressure from a sector of the com- rnlnitf. If the present planning com- missioners are unhappy with the council's decision, they can always take their case to the voters in the next city election. But nobody has a RIGHT to a PlSnning Cornmission seat. Every planning commissioner serves at the will of the council. That doesn't mean Commission is not goiqg to fall apart because two of its present commis- sioners are not reappointed. In fact, we believe the. Planning Commission will be better seryed with new members having new ideas and bringing a fresh perspective to EDITORIAL ? the Peninsula that commlssl0ners 1 I