HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.05.20BURLINGAME CITY COIJNCIL AGENDA
Rncu,AR MBsrNc - MoNoav, MAv 20, 2002
Pecs 1 or 3
.i. CLOSED SESSION:
Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(bX1), (3XC))
Claim of Carl Retter
Claim of Thomas & Adrienne Jones
I. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. MINUTES - Meeting of May 6,2002
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS Theaayormaylinitswakels tothremiauteseach
Weeds & rubbish abatement of private property, Public Hearing and
approval of Resolution
b. Adopt an Ordinance to install a stop sign on Sebastian Drive at
Arguello Drive to provide a three-way stop intersection
c, Adopt an Ordinance deieting one-hour parking and establishing
two-hour parking, the east side of Carolan Avenue from Cadillac Way
to Broadway
PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council.
The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency opell meetlng law) prohibrts council
from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to
refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit
speakers to three minutes each.
6. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
c. Transmittal of Proposed Budget
d. Construction hours and enforcement
e. Introduction of Ordinance Second Unit Amnesty extension for up
to four (4) years
f. l) Adopt Resolution setting time limits for parking in city lots F
and H, and
2) Introduce an Ordinance to grant authority to Burlingame
a.
5
City of Bwlingame
CITY HALL. 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
SUGGffSYWD ACWON
6:45 p.m., Conf Room A
Immediately following joint meeting
with Burlingame School District Board
of Trustees
Approval
Hearing/Action
Heanng/Action
Hearing/Action
Discussion
Discussion
Introduce
1) Adopt
2) Introduce
7
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
RBcur,AR Msuruqc - Mouoev, MAY 20, 2002
PAGE 1 oF 3
Police Department to tow vehicles from city parking lots
g. Consider Introduction of Ordinance amending the massage permit
requirements to allow the release of the surety bond followrng24
consecutive months of lawful operation under the permit
CONSENT CALENDAR - Items on the Consent Calendar are acted on
simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action are requested by a council
member.
a. Resolution Accepting Washington Park Ballfield Renovation by
Scapes Landscape, Inc.
b. Resolution awarding a construction contract to Trinet Construction,
Inc. for the California/Grove Area Stom Drain Pump Station
c. Resolution accepting improvements for Broadway Streetscape North
Side, 1190 to 1454 Broadway, to J.J.R. Construction
d. Resolution awarding South Broadway Streetscape improvements ,
1190 to 1454 Broadway, to J.J.R. Construction, and Resolution
approving transfer of funds to Broadway Streetscape budget
e. Resolution approving agreement fbr design services with Nolte
Associates for the Hyatt pump station reconstruction
f. Tentative & final parcel map for lot combination, lots I thru 4,6,IJ
thru22, block 4, Town of Burlingame, i310-1316 Bayswater Avenue
and l2l Park Road (St. Catherine's Church)
g. Warrants and Payroll, April2002
h. Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Agreement with BFI
Regarding On-call Cleanup Program
i. 1) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to file State
Revolving Fund Loan application and accompanying documents
for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
2) Resolution identifying and dedicating the sewer system use
charges to repayment of the state revolving fund loans,
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
Agreement between City of Burlingame and the Peninsula YMCA
Allowing Burlingame Residents use of the Skatepark Operated by
the YMCA and the City of Millbrae
J
City of Bwlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
Introduce
Approve
City of Budingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRI\4ROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rpcr-n en Mnprnqc - Motloev, MAY 20, 2002
PAGE 1 oF 3
k. Resolution of Intention to approve Broadway Area Business
Improvement District, Setting 2002103 Assessments
8. COMMITTEE REPORTS
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. NEW BUSINESS
11. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, May 2,2002; Planning, May 13,
2002
b. Department Reports: Building, Apnl,2002; Finance, April 30, 2002
c. Letter from Rob Paratte, Teny Earlywine, and Mrs. A Erickson,
regarding proposed Safeway expansion
d, Letter from AT&T Bloadband conceming channel change to cable
service
12. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations 1br disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least
24 hours befbre the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available tbr public review at the City Clerk's otllce, City
Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website
at Www.bUflUgarng.ol& Agendas and minutes are available at this site or listen iive on our LIVE365 Broadcast via
the website.
NEXT MEETING - June 3,2002
)
3.
4.
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JoIxTMEETING wIrH BUnI,INGAME ScuooI Dlsrrucr
Boano orTRusrnes, MoNoAy, MAy 20, 2002
Pacn I or'1
1. CALL TO ORDER (Mayor Janney)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL (Mayor Janney/President Hinshaw)
CEREMONIAL
a. Presentation of Proclamation to Eagle Scout Cooper Goorie
& Marcus Grijalva from ASM Troop 10 (Mayor Janney)
b. Presentation of Proclamation to Jesse Moore, Burlingame
High School Senior, for receiving the AT&T Wireless Award
at the Family Service Agency of San Mateo County Breakfast
(Mayor Janney)
c. lntroduction of new Burlingame High School Principal,
Matthew Biggar (Superintendent Mohr)
d. Report from Superintendent Sonny DaMarto and Mayor Mary
Janney on their goodwill trip to China (DaMarto/Janney)
PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council.
The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council
from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to
reler such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit
speakers lo three minutes each.
6. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilifies, please contact the City
Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy ofthe Agenda Packet
is available for public review at the city clerk's office, city Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at
rvrvrv.burliuqame.ors. Agendas and minutes are available at this site or listen live on our
LIVE365 Broadcast via the website.
City of Burlingame
CIry HALL - 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O
(6s0) ss8-7200
$U_QoEJiTEDA,EA9N
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Presentation
Presentation
Presentation
Discussion
5.
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
Regular Meeting of May 6,2002
1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:A0 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAI\CE TO THE FLAG
Led by Randy Schwartz.
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
None
4. MINUTES
Councilman Galligan requested the minutes the April 15,2002, Council Meeting be amended to insert the
following statement to item 7c) Appoint Planning Commissioners: He requested that it read, "if at some
time a commissioner feels they can no longer work professionally with the Council or Commission and
respect differences of opinion, then the commissioner should resign or expect the City Council to suggest
that they step down. My support of any commissioner would be in the belief that he would have the full
support of the Council if a commissioner is not respectful of differences of opinion."
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of April 15,2002;
seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a, Reintroduction of an Ordinance for a zoning code amendment for new construction building size
in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadwav commercial areas and change to zoning action
expiration
CP Monroe stated that the proposed Ordinance will limit the size of the first floor footprint of new
construction of commercial uses in subarea A of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Diskict and of the
Broadway Commercial District greater than 6,000 square feet in the Burlingame Avenue area and greater
than 5,000 square feet in the Broadway area. Expiration of Planning Approvals will be valid for two years
with no extensions.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
I May 6,2002
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney representing Joe Karp, spoke regarding
conditional use permits.
Councilwoman O'Mahony moved that this item be tabled and reviewed by staff; seconded by Councilman
Galligan. Vice Mayor Coffey commented for the record that he does not own a commercial building in
Burlingame and would not need to recuse himself from this matter. Motion approved unanimously by voice
vote, 5-0.
a.Broadway Area Business Improvement District - Setting 2002/03 Assessments
These assessments generate approximately $25,000.00 a year for use in enhancing the Broadway area's
competitiveness as a retail area. The merchants have also indicated an interest in assisting with the
Broadway Streetscape Improvements that are over budget.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Broadway Area Business Improvement
District 2002103 Assessments; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote,
5-0.
Dijonne Marcelino, 391 Third Avenue, Daly City and Steven Angelis, South San Francisco, spoke regarding
Unity 2000. Rich Grogan, 1450 Columbus Avenue spoke concerning freedom of speech. Sam Malouf,Tl2
Vemon Way spoke conceming the Safeway expansion. Charles Yoltz,725 Yemon Way, spoke concerning
the proposed amendment to the leaf blower Ordinance. Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road spoke concerning the
Safeway expansion.
6. STAFF REPORTS AI\D COMMUNICATIONS
Future Use of the propertv at 30I Airnort Boulevard
CP Monroe stated the 488,000 square ft. office complex will mostly likely not be built and the planning
approval will expire on August 7,2002. Question remains what type of development should be allowed at
that site. Under current zoning and general plan designation, there are a variety of land uses choices for this
site.
Attorney Mark Hudak addressed Council on behalf of Glenborough Partners and proposed that the site be
used for housing; presented a plan for 500 units, one-to-three bedroom town houses and flats which would
include 30 to 40 affordably priced homes for city employees.
Councilmembers agreed to look at alternative uses for the site, which could include a convention center,
retail, development. Housing would be another altemative but it would not generate tax revenue and would
need to be reviewed in terms of schools, police protection, sewer lines, etc.
Amending the bayfront specific area plan would take about ayeff and would cost approximately $100,000 in
consultant fees and staff time to prepare a document that would address the potential land uses for the area.
The council was in consensus that Alternative B be studied to address all the concerns.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
M:ay 6,2002
2
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Janneymoved to Item 7e of the agenda.
e.Consider request to revise Massage Permit Ordinance regarding posting of permit bond
Council asked to consider the request of Elizabeth Graham for temporary relief from the $10,000 surety bond
required to operate her business. Ms. Graham is requesting this relief or reduction of the amount of surety
bond as she has been unable to work due to a physical disability.
Staff was directed to review the option of removing the requirement of a surety bond if after a period of time
the business has been successful, there are no issues with the police department, and that the business prove
to be credible.
troduce Ordin
Police emplovees with the California Public Emplovees'Retirement Svstem (CALPERS) and the
City of Burlineame
Recommend Council approve Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to CALPERS retirement
system and review proposed Ordinance to amend the City of Burlingame's contract with CALPERS
retirement system to provide the police employees with the following benefit enhancements:
Section 2136l.l -3% @55 Formula and Section 21024 Military Service Credit for Public Service.
Mayor Janney requested Deputy City Clerk Weber read the title of the Ordinance. Councilman Galligan
made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved
unanimously by voice vote 5-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed
Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor Jarurey directed Deputy City Clerk Weber publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five
before proposed adoption.
Introduce an Ordinance to install a stop sign on Sebastian Drive at Arguello Drive to provide a
three-wav stop intersection
At the March 14,2002 and April 11,2002, the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered a petition
from residents to install stop signs on all three legs of the intersection at Sebastian Drive and Arguello Drive.
Staff examined the intersection and determined that stop sign warrants were not met based on vehicular
right-of-way, speed and accidents. However, due to a sharp cresting of Arguello Drive immediately east and
adjacent to the roadway, staff recommends that these stop signs be installed to improve safety.
Mayor Jarurey requested Deputy City Clerk Weber read the title of the Ordinance. Councilman Galligan
made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved
unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilman Galligan made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinarrce;
seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor Janney directed Deputy City Clerk Weber publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five
days before proposed adoption.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
J May 6,2002
8.
a.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Special Event Requests for 2002 - Chamber of Commerce
EA Weber requested Council approve the requests made by the Chamber of Commerce for the Burlingame
Avenue Merchants Association Sidewalk Sale, Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival, holiday decorations and
Burlingame Avenue Area Holiday Open House.
b.Special Event Permit - Use of Pershing Park. Saturday. Julv 13. 2002. Avon Breast Cancer 3-
Day WaIk Arlltatiqu
EA Weber requested Council approve special event application for use of Pershing Park as an aid station for
the Avon Breast Cancer 3-day walk on Saturday, July 13, 2002 from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
c.Tentative and Final Parcel Map for lot combination. Lgts 18 through 20. Block 14, Burlingame
Grove, 116{ Broadway
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve the tentative and final parcel map for lot combination, lots l8
through 20, Block 14, Burlingame Grove, 1160 Broadway.
d.Adoption of Resolution #43-2002 Fixins the Emplover's Contribution Under the Public
Emplovees'Medical and llospital Care Act
DHR Bell requested Council approve Resolution #43-2002 increasing the City's contribution towards
medical premiums effective January 1,2002 for employees and annuitant covered by the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of Burlingame and the Police Officers' Association (POA).
e.Adoption of Resolution#44-2002 to approve lease modification for Federal Aviation
Administration, Windshear Alert System
DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Resolution #44-2002 to approve the lease modification with the
Federal Aviation Administration @AA) for the Windshear Alert System.
f. ddopt Resolution f*45-2002 application to applv for Grant Funds for the Roberti-Z'Bere-Harris
Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks. Clean Water.
Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000.
DPR Schwartz requested Council adopt Resolution #45-2002 approving the application for Roberti-Z'Berg-
Harris funds under the Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000.
g. Adoption Resolution #46-2002 Acceptinq CalifornidGrove storm Drain Improvement Proiect.
Phase 2
DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Resolution #46-2002 accepting the CalifomialGrove Storm
Drain Improvement Project, Phase 2, in the amount of $868,027.82.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes4
May 6,2002
h. Adoption of Resolution *f47-2002 accepting Trenton PIav Area Renovation - Citv Proiect #80140
DPR Schwartz recommended Council adopt Resolution #47-2002 accepting as complete the work done by
Lone Start Landscape, Inc. at the Trenton Play Area.
i. Approval of Contract with Design, Communitv and Environment for Consulting Services to
Prepare a Planning Studv and Specific Area Plan for the North End of Burlingame
j.Annointment of Svstem Board Member
CL Escoffier recorlmended Jane Dunbar as Burlingame's representative to the Peninsula Library System,
System Advisory Board for a two-year term, serving from July 1,2002 go June 30,2004.
k. Resuest to Serve Alcohol at Library Foundation Function
CL Escoff,rer recommended Council approve the serving of alcoholic beverages at the Burlingame
Foundation Fundraiser to be held in the public areas of the Main Library on Saturday, October 19,2002,
from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
l. Investment Policv for 2002
ACM Becker requested Council approve the Investment Policy for 2002.
m. Authorize Citv Attornev to Join in Amicus Curiae Brief in Citv of Calsbad vs. Baker. Case No.
D019112. at no cost to Citv
CA Anderson requested Council authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to the City in City of
Carlsbad vs. Baker, which is now pending before the California Court of Appeals.
n. Authorize Citv Attornev to Join in Amicus Curiaq Brief in Metropolitan Water District vs.. Superior Court (Cargill). Case No. 8148446. at no cost to Citv
CA Anderson requested Council authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to City in
Metropolitan Water District vs. Superior Court (Cargill), which is now pending before the California
Supreme Court.
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee
10. OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
they each attended on behalf of the City.
5
NfDD
May 6,2002
CP Monroe requested Council adopt Resolution #48-2002 to approve agreement for preparation of a specific
area plan for the north end of Burlingame with Design, Community and Environment and adopt Resolution
#49-2002 to approve the transfer of funds.
11. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees, March 19,2002; Traffic, Safety and Parking, April l l,
2002; Planning, Apil 22, 2002
b. Department Reports: Police, March 2002
c.Letter from Patricia Gray concerning affordable housing in Burlingame
d. Letter from N. Carol Davis, Wichita, KS to Rahn Becker thanking him for assisting with transportation to
hotel
e. Letter from AT&T Broadband concerning programming changes
f. Memorandum from DPW Bagdon concerning sewer and water infrastructure program press conference
onMay 13,2002
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. in memory of Police Dog Kai, partner of Officer Jeff
Downs, and former police employee, Lilian Saint Julien.
Respectfu lly submitted,
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes6
May 6,2002
I
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #4a
MTG.
DATE 5t20to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
MAY 8, 2002
APPROVED
PUBLIC WORKS BY
BY
SUBJECT: WEEDS AND RUBBISH ABATEMENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY - PUBLIC HEARING AND
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION - CITY JOB NO. 80610
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing to receive any objections to
proposed weed and rubbish removal and approve a resolution "Ordering the Destruction of Noxious and
Dangerous Weeds and Rubbish a Nuisance in the City of Burlingame."
BACKGROUND: Each year the City establishes the Weed and Rubbish Abatement Program. As part of the
program, Council declared weeds and rubbish a nuisance on April L, 2002. Since then, staff has surveyed the
City and posted properfy which requires abatement. The Public Works Director will have a list of all posted
properties available at the time of the hearing.
After Council approves the resolution, staff will notiff the affected property owners by certified mail as to the
deadline for weed and rubbish removal. All unabated nuisances will be addressed by a city contractor and a lien
will be placed on the property to recover the removal expenses.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Sample Posting Notice
Syed
City
P.E
(650) ss8-7230
c: City Clerk
pa
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reporu\WEED.STF
RESOLUTION NO.
ORDERING THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS AND
DANGEROUS WEEDS AND RIJBBISH A NIIISANCE
IN THE CITY OF BI.'RLINGAME
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Burlingame on April l, 2002, at a regular
meeting of said Council, adopted a resolution declaring certain weeds growing upon various
streets, squares, lanes, alleys, avenues, coutrs and places within said municipality, and upon
private property within said municipality, which said weeds bear seeds of a wingy or downy nature
and are otherwise obnoxious and dangerous, and all rubbish, refuse and dirt upon parkways,
sidewalks or private property, to constitute a public nuisance; and
WHEREAS, said resolution fixed Monday, the 20't day of May, 2002, at the hour of seven
p.m. of said day, at the City Council Chambers of the City of Burlingame, located in the City
Hall of said City, as the time and place when objections to the proposed removal of such weeds
shall be heard and given due consideration; and
WHEREAS it appears that notice of said hearing has been given for the time and in the
manner and form provided by law; and
WHEREAS, it appears that no objections to the proposed removal of such weeds were
presented;
1
t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame
that the City Engineer of the City of Burlingame be, and he hereby is directed to remove and
eradicate such weeds as described in the Resolution of Intention passed and adopted on April 1,
2N2.
AND said City Engineer of said City of Burlingame is hereby authorized and directed to
fix the costs of such removal and eradication of weeds, and in the event of any delinquency of the
payment of said costs to report the same to the City Clerk of the City of Burlingame so that the
costs may be collected in the manner provided by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_ day of _ , 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
S:\A Public Works DiIecIoryWIISCELLA\WEEDDEST.RES
2
City Clerk
TO
REMOVE WEEDS
AND RUBBISH
Notice is hereby given that on the lst day of April,2O02, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of
the City of Burlingame, Chapter 11.08 (Ordinance No. 469), the City Council of said City passed Resolution
No. 31-2002 declaring that all weeds growing or rubbish existing upon any private property or in any public
street or alley, of such character as to be a fire menace or otherwise noxious or dangerous, constitute a public
nuisance and must be abated by destruction or removal thereof.
Notice is further given that propert5r owners shall, withoutdelay, destroy and remove all such weeds or rubbish
from their properly and the abutting one-half of the street in front and alley, if any, behind such property and
between the lot lines extended and maintain a clean condition continuously throughout the year; or such weeds
and rubbish will be destroyed and the nuisance removed by the City, in which case the cost of destruction or
removal will be assessed upon the land from which, or from the front or rear of which, such weeds or rubbish
shall have been destroyed or removed; and such cost will constitute a lien upon such land until paid, and will
be collected upon the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected.
All property owners having any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds or rubbish are
hereby notified to attend a meeting of the Council of said City, to be held at the Council Chambers in the City
Hall in said City, May 20,20ff2 at 7:00 P.M., when and where objections will be heard and given due
consideration.
TTIE CITY OF BI]RLINGAME
Syed Murtuza, City Engineer
Dated: April lo,2m/2
S:\A hrblic lYorks Direcrory\l{ISCELLA\WEED.NTlC
WEEDS AND RI]BBISII ABATEMENT
LOCATIONS OF NOTICES POSTED
JOB NO.80610
LOCAT/ON5 OF WEED.'
ABAtEY/E/ f Nof/CE^I P.lsfED
tra
5-2o-oL
RE-M]I"EZ5
Dat/.2rtt'
,VA,CAN 7
VkepT
t/AcAPf /aZ
UMAPT LaT
I
2
4
5
6
s
l.ul.\(ns
\
N
N
N
\
\
s
S
$t
\
Q\
S
at
\{l\
\
ss
N
$
N
-\
,s
H
Ns{
N
B(A
N
N
N
N
s(
l*'.e
N
\J-$)
\\JLO-CA.T./ OM PAECEL NO,
o/,x //x xVlCnNf bri p'Eftt/EEN
/2ood /240 Epfs4orc, t/rctluaY
o26-142-ozo
o26-/42-o?o
x xa/ro/ol Clt/.Qatl/a O&aE
BoaLtuOeuE Faao
/,x%o85 Cezttustte aeUe
,0580 eAA l,o7
il,X x79 cA//FoR^//A 24tL'E
OSEo Ana /o 7
%,x x:CnA irarzaoe lor oN /lE
Coil)Et o F ?ErtlQsoLa / Hrcltto,,to
x/*/
Cpasro/a\cE Zo7 oP ftle.
C an ttEl2 o F hafeyt lEz I H alU rtO
4//20 x (/6t hailnPo 4uElaE
lAe sTop4ae /,oT /lo
M ttllllIIIIIIII
ft:h
s,N
h-.
ttttttt I
[)CAT/1NS 0F TVEEO-,
Ats-4 /Vll[-f
^/oif/CE;
PosfED
MO:
5-Zo'oL
REMA]ZK5
Clenaeo As oF 5-5-oz
C/apu As atr f'/z-oz-
U 7 ailOrNg
ilentra 4s oF -O2
I
q
/o
/l
/Z
t?
q
R,q\t
K
\
$
S
N
$
N
\
N
H
N
N
B
(A
N
H
ft:h
\
N
N
Nv
h"e
N
$$t\
\..JPJEOEL No,
N(ns
\
N
NLacA-nOtV
x/*
//o/ Hoanto t4 clENUr€. -( aN l/raltntt2 nuetloU)
(4//zo x x/8/0 * /8/8 Ecz'( UAce,*tl Lo /5 )
%,X?ta m1/e6/ Eatz
x%,8 zt rtlqlub fla,+o
xa/qo 27 mplutn ,uno
x x/ztgfi ////{c/tE/ ,rZop
4//(/6/6 dqBeeil &oeo C/aaveo As ol l-/z'az
IIIIIIII
N
\
\
s
s
$
\
\t
$
s
X
I I I ttttlt
IOCAT/ON, OF I,VEEO-'
Afr-nf5tlE f //07/CE-5 P.19rEO
[0i
5-ZoOL
REMZ'8R"5
As of 5-/$'dZ
l/eaaeq A.s aE /z-az
c/eeaaz ,4s aF .{-/Z-oZ
C/enae0 4S 5'/2,'a-
cikapeo As ap 5-/2.o2
3
44
4t
LO.CA.T"JOM PAECEL NO,
N(Asq.
N
N
.N
\
\
St
u
\lirt
5r
s
a
R,q
{
K
=$
S
N
$
R
,s
H
N
N
B(A
N
N
l-.
R
N
\rtt$t
\\J
u
Nv
Ze/B 845/at/ 4Eila{f/zt x x x
2/04 ,/rt/trae 23UA %t x x (
/o43 OpUa Arc,uae a/,x x
%t Y x x/r2g o4t93t 4OrglaA
%,x X/ /25 cnap/ao llaraa
a/,x X X I/?+B O,AG l/&t/a{_
i
%?x x *.x/4r3 Baatil fuEt/(/E
IIIIIIII
ftrh\,NI.\
IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-'
AHn fE/VEltl f //0 f/ CE- e Pls fEO
W:
5 -2o-oz
REMARKS
&ze,uei.ct aF eZ
a/aopeo 4s oF 5-9'az
aF 5-5'az
fuuea As aF/-/z-az
Ck:eilEo ,+S aF 5-5-AZ
€4lPa2 ,45 arc 5'5'aZ
60
5/
5z
,3
5s
LO-CA-T" /ON PAECEL /,1O.
N
$
N
N
.N
\
\
os
S
$t(t
$*
s
atq
{
K
=ss
N
H
N
\\^
.ai
H
}-
N
N
B
$
N
ih
\lN
t".
u
Nv
l''..e
N
s(r)
\\J
//o/ Dauo/ts %x x
/ZZSdtbBBatOa //8.,b ><)(
/73o filzao/a/o tfal %x X
%X X/Zao Eoqr//rUOerUE
/204 Pntn 0&uE fr,K x
%a d I K/t/5 Satc//cz /te.
2B 6boaFt6e ,4artO a/o x x Y56 d/altteo As oF €y'|-oz
lttttttlttttttt lrlt
ltttttlrlt I
IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-'
AB-n Etlf_ tl T //0i r/cr_ e P1srED
96
?
4o
[0
76
,
5 -Zo -oZ
"RE7VZZKS"
Z/eaael ofi *-9a'o?-
r Zltatr? ps aF 5-t2-oz
C/sa,ueo lS aF 4-Z?aZ
C/repaa ,4s aF -oz
P-ApeEL No,
Nhs.
\
N
N
N
\
\
s
s
$t
li..t
$
s
atq
{t\
\
$
S
Nsr
N
s(A
N
N
,\
Q
Nv
t'..
a
N
s(rt
\\.,LO_CA_r./ OM
224 2arclrAoeo /u Y x /
I? Anwoel Eaao 4/zt I x
x xB Loefarr,.l ,4U6UAE z//u x
x/%x/ 00? D ilfrliloepe,4/E/ctE
4/b x x x/ta? /awee Aue,{ae
X%/x x/5ze 6ttfutq ,U?
xtitz Oru#at arl /%X K
I
frs oF -tr-/z -az
It I tl
N
$
N
\
N
N
ft:
iu)
\NI'\
LO-CA.T/OM PAEaEL No,
N(ns
\
N
N
.N
\
\
s
R
atq
{
h-
\ss
N
€
N
F
N
H
l'-
a
N
s
!n)
\\t
N
N
B(A
N
N
f,:h
sr,
N
N
Nv
5ot'h| lpn&*so naru{%o x K
%x xqtu€36 0//6ta/E AuE,
B 0a hoeaoil lUE,%o x K x
4/*X x xflar 4pPp64 PaE,
x x855,857€ gt?
,Sozaps 4ono %o
x x XVO flaZ/ttktoelttttE %
/0o{ ralad 2eruE %o X /K
[0 cA T/0N5 0F tl/EEO-f
Ats n E/VE/IIT ilo VCE 5 P-1s fEO
57
56
6/
6Z
MO
6a
5-ZooZ
RE'/t?A'Z/<3
€leapEo 4S of l-$-a Z
AsaF 5-B'a z
C/ZzpEP 4s o,€ €-B-dz
c/e*teo AS oE €84L
cat/e0 AS oF 5-8-aZ
63
lttrttrtttttttt ttt
$
\
\
\
o\
s
I
[o:
4
6'
6
6s
IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO.'
ABI E Vf- /Y f //OT/CE- 5 P2sfED
66
5-Zo-OZ
REMA-EK5
C/apeo A-saF €8-oz-
d&auso A-s oE -e'/Z'oZ
llEat6? 4s aF 5'/*a z
cke,ua *s ot €4zaz
1/84uil 4S oF5-/242
_LO-CA_7:"./A.N PApcE-L Na,
sNl.\
$
N
N
N
\
\
s
R
$tl\
Q\
s
qIq
{
h-
\
$s
N
s
N
N
\b\
N
H
N
N
B(A
Ni
N
i
ft:
k)
\,
.N,'l
-\\.
u
Nv
l-'.
e
N
sq
\\J
/O0o TlYarJ A&a€%.x x x
?// raloN DBru€././/3o x K x
/357 qsawl Aud,5/x Y x
/436 22afr *UE,/,X x x
%x// /5 *qaru/hz ,4/8,x x
I
?4{ a4//HA///A }ztyE 7r x )<
t
6eS4sSappyg 2ptuL %X x7d 4s aF ,5-/7-oz-
j
I I I I
MA
[?CAT/1NS 0F TVEEO-,
AB A E/tlErY- T //0' 7/ CE- 5 P-ls fED
7z
5'Zo-OZ
R:EMA'ERS
€ottw
peuu€/huri Alattc EL€tntua 4cRnL
laNO 6
fPurlE /+/a^r6 El €An*P
a/aattEo 4s aF 5-/Z-az
c/EApEo 45 oF 5-/?'OZ
c/6it/6e ls or -f-/$-oL
'od4
ut
\t
s
s
aI<\
{
K
=s
S
N
H
N
N
R
N
H
N
N
Bv\
nt
N
fr,N,.)
\,
,Qllh:,
.il
Nv
h-
a
N\tlll
\\rLOCAT..IOM PAP1EL /,1o.
SN!.\I
\
N
N
N
\
\
sa
>l_
*X74o ELCtaruaPatL
%x733 furi*heu ,€anP
%60/ ltruF#Lo &to
X x%XTooEl&ttttbSE*L
b,//5 X// ?aE/ ceilno ?aee
,b X x x//tg ltcailr/e,AAE,
x/475/ruaa/Nlue,%77 e efi*rEf)
rttrrtllllllltr I
MA:
IOCAT/ON, OF I,VEEO.'
Ats 0 EME/Y f //of/C€-i P1sfED
8z
REMAZK"s
PeutA rv{ ela}rc fIL ceeuuo &8n2,-
a
C/Etl/Eo A.s aF 5-/?'aZ
A:Ea^,,F-P 4s aP €-/4'oZ
A,
h...e
N
s(rt
\
lJ..JL.o-cA-nO.tV PAECE-L No,
N
s
\
N
N
N
\
\
-$as*
$
\
\t
$
s
q
Rq
{
K
\\\)
S
N
$
N
F
N
H
Nsr
N
B(A
N
N
ft,hs
NN
a\
s
Nv
%X/3a8 El Aeltuua ruL
%
^
Eta 671tuuab 0Ee,
><X/246 ELCentw aeaL %
5//7 /x/4oo El Cttrll/a Ednt
V7 Xl4f7 - /4.{7EL €Atrlw RAU
%x i.tno/, rSoZ O' /fds
,4 r/t--srda' oPtu€
x ><
/ 325 - /r27Ezcen*w @L 7 /q 4lttel
III
5 -Zo-oz
I I I I I
[0 cA T/0N5 0F n/EEO-'
mA ffllflll f //1f/CE- 5 P-lsfEO
ffa
E5
I
ffi
5-20'O L
RE-MV"/{K3
QzgsP lsal .fl?'az
/*SdE 5y'2-a Z
a|/ff8/{7
86
7a
/ncar"./aN PAPCE-L No.
N(ns
\
N
N
N
\
\
ss>t
$
\
\
$
s
N
$
N
,\\r\
N
H
N
S{
N
B(A
Ni
N
f:
P)
N,Nf'.
\(n
\.(l
si
Nv
l-'.
:a
N
\Jlrt
\\J
/3 2/ Et cifi/ra Eset ,h X X x
V7 X/45 E/ dfrif/ilo r4eru
%x X xB4t ,€rZrus fu*t
x xZa6 fuirtlsule lug %x
x x X?aa &fuvsot* &uE,%
%)(4zt Ctot/laqnr/t Oe.
/Szfennbnan 28.5/
//,x x x Cta4tt/e 4s oF 547-oZ
IItIIIIIIII
at
\N
K
\s
S
I I I I
f.OCA T/ONS OF I,I/EED-'
ffi! Et1/E/!1 f //o f/ CE- 5 P-ls fED
MO:
Z
5-zo-o L
"REMAAKS
ClEnoE2 4s oF €-/*aZ
clEtilEo ,as aF.*/?az
4l€AN€O 43 oF 5/?-dZ
N
H
N
N
-\
*N
H
N
N
B
(A
N
N
ft:
ws,
.Q'
F-,
N
Nv
F..
R
N
$(rt
\
\/acA_T_/oAl PAE'EL No,
R
s
\
N
N
-N
\
\
..ss>t
$t
[-
\
s
s
a
R,
\{
K
=ss
5/
//,x x X/42/'44/tFaPa/4 22,
x xV38Z/ tt//t/c/es7&a Ip.
X74Xx/2/3 /,+Paa/raa fuA,
II I
IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO,
AH-q Etl5r/ T //0r/ CE_ 5 P_os rEO
tro:
5 -Zct -oz
.REMA"]{K3
UncANf BUILO|tiQ,
CleatEO As ot 4-2+-oZ
c/aaaeg As oE f'f*az
EZEqNEO 4s oF i-/ZQZ
C/zauas SO 4 'OZ
/5
/6
/8
/7
2o
N(ns
\
N
N
N
\
\
s
R
$
\
\t
$
s
atq
{
K
\ss
N
$
N
\\r\
N
H
N
N
s(n
ni
N
N
N
N
t-.
e
N
$(t)
\\.,
alr (x/2??lelilaqailoluny
%"x x/.€o/ ELloaNo ,eena
a/u X x/304 s/qu/EltOZile
x4/,(/1/Z SZ/ile*/ a'Qt/E
%x x/5r/ AtlaBps 22r/E
4ru X x x/?/o &luaOas 4/rn/ae
/260-/270 Eolluts rbqO 4h x2t 5u8t/etrot(
r r I r r r I I I r I r i r r r r r .r
f:
M)
SrN
h-..LO_CA_T./OM PApcEL No,
lrttttttttttr ttttl
L'0 cA T/0N5 0F I//EEO-'
ffo
5 -20'OL
RE'MAER"S
C/ee,oEo As oF 5-5-oZ
c/auo&O 4s oFf-?-oZ
oFF/cE e a&or
uecaPf 44P aUsf/
2z
2e
27
2u
%
LO_CA.r"./ON
N
s
\
N
N
-N
\
\
sa
>L
ut
\
\
$\
s
a
R,q
N
h-
=ss
N
s
N
\
s
H
N
SI
N
B(A
N
N
i
ft:h
\l
,\
N
Nv
h.
R
N
s$t
\
}J..1
ll ga/zktfiArilE 4AEildE /r"><
a/r+x xfiaa P6'tt/,tlsutP A /l't/uE
5o8 Pa{n/so/.e AugilaE 4/%x x x *.
l,l/Z Pa{ilsa/e 4/A{08 /%x x I l,
%+x X/oo E/ *tatua /eE4L
/079 Cat4opillA OPtaE %x x x
%+/(22oz Soutf 2en/L CL 45 dF l-/5.O2
PApcEL No,
x
m_n rEMEil r //o r/ cf- 5 P-1s rED
IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-'
mA TEMEll r //oi r/ cE_ e P1s rEo
MA;
5'2o-oL
REM4HKs
Asot f47-o2
4/g*aeo es or 4-%-tZ
C/plttao ,, 4t.-20'oZ
C/eeaeo 45 or 5-/5-dL
€/Etaao 4s dF {-lzoz
2?
3o
"l
92
LOCA.T/ ON P_AEaEL No,
*sl.\I
\
N
N
N
\
\
-ng)
e>l*
$tL
\
$
s
q
R,q
{
K
\
s
S
N
$
N
*
N
H
\s{
N
B
(A
N
N
N
iu,
Sr
,N,
F-.
N
Nv
l-'.e
N
s$t
\U
l20/ -/ 2o5€fuRrrelrl4 {Uu{UE 4h x x x
/ 2 to Aanrzlr lA A t/Efi LtE /r4 /(
^oq
//owpeo 2/Erta6 4h x x x
/ 4/ v/cfaalA "frn*o /zi x x X
/42 chtuaq fuea %x //
/r7 clnriltil, Aaao %x x x
2ZZ ntL,tc:,t'z fia*n /zs x x X c/eatteo es oF 4 -fu 42
lttttttttttttt I ttt I
TO
REMOVE WEEDS
AND RUBBISH
Notice is hereby given that on the lst day of April, 2002, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code o
the City of Burlingame, Cbapter I 1.08 (Ordinance No. 469), the City Council of said City passed Resolutio:- No. 3l-2CfJf2 declaring tlrat all weeds growing or rubbish existing upon any private property or in any publi
street or alley, of zuch character as to be a fire menace or otherwise noxious or dangerous, constitute a publi
- nuisance and must be abated by destruction or removal thereof.
Notice is further given that property owners shall, without delay, destroy and remove all such weeds or rubbis
- ftom their property and the abufing one-half of the street in front and alley, if any, behind such property an
between the lot lines extended and mahtain a clean condition continuously throughout the year; or such weed
_ and rubbish will be destroyed and the nuisance removed by the City, in which case the cost of destruction o
removal will be assessed upon the land from which, or from the front or rear of which, such weeds or rubbis
shall have been destroyed or removed; aod such cost will coostitute a lien upon such land until paid, and wil
- be collected upon the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected.
All property owners baving any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds or rubbish ar- hereby notified to asend a meeting of the Council of said City, to be held at the Council Chambers in the Cit
Hall in said City, May 20,20ff2 at 7:fi) P.M., when and where objections will be heard and given du
- consideration.
S:\A Public Wortr DiTE oTyMISCELLA\wEED.NIC
THE CITY OF BI.]RLINGAME
Syed Murtuza, City Engineer
Dated: April lO,200.2
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
April 24, 2OO2
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
l+b
5t20to2
DA
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
sUBJECT: ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO INSTALL A STOP SIGN O EBASTIAN DRIVE AT
ARGUEL LO DRIVE TO PROV]DE A THREE-WAY STOP INTERSECTION
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing to
l. Adopt the proposed ordinance.
2. Direct City Clerk to publish a sunmary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROTIND: At their March 14, and April 1 1,2002 meetings, the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission
(TSPC) considered a petition from local residents requesting that stop signs be installed on all three legs of the tee
intersection at Sebastian Drive and Arguello Drive. There was a concern bythe residents that the crest on Arguello
Drive near the intersection created sight distance problems for eastbound drivers. At their April 1 l, 2002 mieting,
the TSPC passed a motion recommending the installation ofthree-way stop signs at this tee intersection. Meeting
notices were posted on barricade-mounted signs at the intersection, and the adjacent neighborhood was notified.
There were no objections expressed at these meetings.
STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff examined the intersection and determined that stop sign warrants were not met based
on vehicular right of way, speed and accidents. However, due to a sharp cresting of Arguello Drive immediately
east and adjacent to the intersection, the required stopping sight distance is not met for seeing smaller objects in
the roadway at the 25 mph or the prima facie speed limit. As a result, staff recommends that these stop signs be
installed to improve safety.
Although the existing ordinance already includes stop signs on the two Arguello Drive legs of the intersection, the
signage was never installed since the area was developed. With Council approval ofthis amended ordinance, staff
will be able to install signage at all three legs. The intersection has Stop Sign Meeting signs posted, and notices
have been sent to the neighborhood for this Council meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of installing the three stop signs is estimated to be $500. There are sufficient funds
available in the City's current maintenance budget for this work.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Location map; Aerial Photographs; Public Notice to applicant and residents
Petition and Letters from local residents; TSPC Minutes for Marchl4 and April 11,2002
Frank C , P.E.
Asst. Public Works Director
650-558-7230
c: City Clerk, Police Department, Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\SebastianDr@ArguelloDr.3WayStopStalfRpt 2.wpd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE No.
ORDINAI\ICE OF TIIE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME
AMEI\IDING SECTION 13.20.010 FOR
INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OT
SEBASTIAIY DRIVE AT ARGUELLO DRIVE
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section l. The City has received a petition from residents of the Arguello Drive
neighborhood seeking the placement ofa stop sign at Sebastian Drive approaching Arguello Drive.
The City Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered the petition and received testimony
regarding the pedeshian needs and traffrc problems in the area and recofltmended placement of a
stop sign at this approach to the intersection.
Section 2. Subsection 13.20.010(s) is amended to read as follows:
(s) SanchezAvenueapproachingCortezAvenue;
Sebastian Drive approaching Arguello Drive;
Sebastian Drive approaching Frontera Way;
Sebastian Drive approaching Mariposa Drive;
Sebastian Drive approaching Trousdale Drive;
Sequoia Avenue approaching Murchison Drive;
Sequoia Avenue approaching Trousdale Drive;
Skyline Boulevard approaching Trousdale Drive;
Skyview Drive approaching Skyline Boulevard;
Stanton Road approaching Gilbreth Road;
Summit Drive approaching El Prado Road;
Summit Drive approaching Hillside Circle.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by.law
Mayor
I
)
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l1
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the
foregoing ordinance was introducedataregular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th day
of May, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the-
day oL 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BURLlNGAMEV-ocal Settings\Temp\stopsign20025.pwd.wpd
q
?lrlr,a t.7.
at.ttI9t,t
IVERA
\B
=roL
(,o
b6?J
((lN
fi r.r
Z2
q
5"7
+vt
-\'fc R
\
)
a
6\
o
I
*,.
kt
-!T I B U R ON Y{A
rlI
Lo€
I
(fl
13t
,/
N
s\
,att
ta
!GU C L
6
Aoo'
..-_5)
AR
ptch
DR lvE I
sEr:a,sflsN pF.l /6 Ar
ABarlguuo eP/.{€
It
,!_
aa
luN$u(D
,.
N5it
(\t
3
N
0o
u
NN
<,n s
6\
B$o
.tt
s
iu
f
NoiI
aa.at
@
(o
,f
@I
i'T
ffrtgEE SA.{*gIaPSIA;1-
oou
@
I
N,o
2a
1
5
No
q5f
NaiN
ooIEn
6t
,-N(!$o(o
at
$do
19
G-t'
D a,
v55
tr.rt
&o
U
5h'lttrn*.1:*ii;"
YOX PARr )
23
,.'er!.|
I
(
SEEASr/HN PFrYE ^rAR6UCI,6 DRIVf
The City of Burlingam,e
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Tel:(65O1 558-723O
Far(65O1 685-9310
CfrY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CAUFORMA 9/rc1c3997
CORFORATION YARD
Tel:(65O) 558-7670
'l
www.
TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION MEETING
7:00 p.m,, Thursday, April 11,2002
City Hall, Conference Room A, 501 Primrose Road
The City of Burlingame received a request for 3-way stop signs at the intersection of
Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive.
ThisitemwillbeacknowledgedatthenextTrafficCommissionmeetingonApril ll,2OO2,
at7:00 p.m. in Burlingarne City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Ist Floor, Conference Room A.
You are welcome to attend this meeting. At the meeting, attendees will have an
opportunity to speak and comment on their concerns. Your attendance, however, is not
required for the Commission to consider this matter. The Commission may choose to
discuss and/or act on this requestat this meeting. Ifyou are unable to attend this meeting,
you may submit your written comments to Traffic. Safety and Parking Commission. 501
Primrose Road. Burlineame. C4 94010. Your written comments will be submitted to the
Commission.
Ifyou have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please call
Frank Erbacher at 650-558-7230.
\5
NOTICE
PUBLIC MEETING
TO DISCUSS INSTALLATION OF
3-WAY STOP SIGNS AT INTERSECTION
OF ARGUELLO DRIVE AND SEBASTIAN DRIVE
rr3
tr
[o
o
I
. Reduce danger-from blind spots and provide better visibility to
,drivers and pedesftians on Arguello AII{D Sebastian Drives
. Reduce danger to children ptayrng in streets near this intersection
o Allow safer home driveway entrance and exit near intersection
Arguello Drive Stop Sign Petition
Stop Sign Needed To:
On March 14, 2002, the Burlingame
Traffic Commissionwill meet to discuss
traffic concerrut at the intersection of
Arguello & Sebastian Drives
PLEASE PIAN TO ATTENDII
T;r" *, t. fon o4r )t7? n u. /lo
tla_..2b tt<__i3g*-z-pr-n aB
'qlZt o
t(
FI
P,
Signafure
Please sign below to indicate your support for a stop sign
at the intersection of Arguello and Sebastian Drives!
Name Address
o
L
/,
/-,*
i
Argtrello Drive Stop Sign Petition
Pleasp sign below fo indigate your support for a'stop sigu
at the intersection of Arguello and sebastian Drives!
Address
ol
i,
': :.: I .:' '
a::
t\
P-O. Po( ioO
Brrftrgflre, C ga{Xf
February 25,20U2
Fbnnyoun Barekat,
Traffic/Associate Engineer
The Ctty of Burfinganre
501 Prinume Road
Burfirgane, CA94010
DearMr. Barekat
Respecfully
Jdrn E Rornan
On bdtralf of Burtrgane rex;irren$ my wife and myself, pbase reil tib lefrer as a reqnest for affic ra/iew d the htersedixr dAryrelo and Sebag&rr Drive h Arfrgane ns reslOenE rryho fve
near ttis inbrseciitrn, we be$eve that a 3-uray s{op sign b requled due to stgrtiEcant Hind spo6 trat
exist
--.. i -:==-
rtt' I--'-
.
Or rnah conoem b tre fact ftat ttrere are no silop r&ns d thb hersdion. The danger of an accilent
bhcrereirpasthenun$erofdrildrenpEyhghthesfiee[hcreases. Driversenter0reinterseaion
wffiontteabf,ftytoseeorerthecrestoffrchifionArguesot]ive. Driversabowtriparoundfire66Nner
on SeHian Drive wi[rcut regad for sonreone crrcnng tE steet Additirnaly, s;ince tre haffic h35
incrmed m AgueIo Drive it b nrre.dangerous lhan ever to puil out of orr diveurays due b the bfind
spots oonrftr€ overtheh!tr onArgueflo Drive
\Ah are also requeding that broken reflefrrdots be reptaoed on Argrue[o Drive.
Pbase advise if here b a form orpeffiftm b be comfleted brthis request I plan to afterd tre haffic
oonrnissnm nteeting on Marcfr 14'aruC speak m behalf of the concenreO nei,ghbors. I can be
contacted at (650) 6976461.
4,
5:t
\
Itacfr lO,2m2
TRAf,Frc SAFETY AND PARKII.IG COMMISSION MEETNrc
Citythll
CootrwRoomA
PrirocRod
Butinearrq CA
REGARDT}.IG }.IOTICE FOR }WAY ST@ SIGN AT INTERSECTION
OF ARGT'EI'O DRTVE AND SEBASTIAN DRIVE
THISST@SIGNIS LOI.IGOVi]RDUE WE}IAVE SMAII CHILDRENINTTIEAREAWTIOCON}.OT
GO OUTSIIE TO PLAY. I LIVE ON TIIE CORNER OF SEBASTIAN AI.ID ARGT'EIII) DRIVE AI{D
I IIAVE TOBE VERY VERY CAREFT.,L BACXING O[,T OF MY GARAGE OR. Pt,LIIirc INTO MY
GARAGE FOR. FEAROF BEII.IGHIT I;ROM I,JPWARD ANDDOWNWARD ARGUEII.o TRAFFIC
I{IELYTHIS HAS BBCOME ASPEEDWAY_ESPtsCIALLY ItrIDAYMGHTS.
N,sO. TIIETEM?!,E ACROSS TIIE STREE'T TIAS lr DAY ScIrcOL AND ARELIGIOT'S SCHOOI-
WHICH TIM CHILIXEN EXTHER WALK TO OR. G.J C JT SIDE FOR ACIIWIIES.
WE AISO TIAVE A SEMOR, FOPI,'I.ATIOT{ WHO EN'OY WALXI}rc WNH THEIR DOGS. THIS
TOO IIAS BECOME VERY RISKY FOR TIIEM A}.ID TIIE A}.IIMAIS.
PLEASE COD.ISIDER OtR. REQLTEST. OT R FEAR IS WHEN BART BECOTVTE.S PART OF OUR
COII,ffVITINITY.THIS SITUATKhI. AS WELLA.STROI,'SDALD,TI/ILLBEOOME VERY
SERIOUS FOR,ALLGUS.
SII.ICERELY,fu/2e.2-/
AI{N.XAEErFrAr.rD
r@gEBAsrrANDRrvE
BlELrl.ICArvrE, CA 9,rc10
"^-ss9492-3s6t'- ;:SIiland @yahoo.com
ir.,.,
PS I am thc origiml ownerand reside herc.
llAR I 4 2002
OFOEPT.ofcmY
EVEIGE
#
My name is Mary Cotter. I live at 2847 Arguello Drive. My home is right
at the intersection of Arguello & Sebastian. This location is on the crest
of a hill. Sometimes people drive right through @ speeds of 45 to 5O
miles per hour with little no clear view ahead of them. Kids play in the
neighborhood. They ride their bikes and rollerblade in the streets. It is
entirely possible that some child could be seriously injured or possible
die because of unsafe drivers. A three way stop sign is needed at this
intersection for our safety and tJle safety of our children.
,t
6
"h (
,?
TRAFFIG, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
iThursday, March 14, 2002
driveway with a good view of cross traffic which tends to move at over 35 mph. Also, a second red
zone needs repainting.
Officer Tamura advised that Rollins Road is now on selective enforcement due to this request.
Mr. Erbacher advised that the City will notice the neighborhood of this request for the next meeting.
5.2 l3O9 North Carolan Avenue - Request for Red Zone
The petitioner was not present.
5.3 Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive - Request for 3-Way Stop Signs
Mr. Roman submitted a signed petition for rhis request. He stated that there are numerous blint spots
for drivers accessing this intersection which is a hazard for the neighborhood children and for cars
backing out of their driveways at this site. Also, there has be-en an increase in school traffrc for the
Franklin School. Ms. Cotter stated her home is at this intersection which is on the crest of a hill; and
with the police upping their enforcement on Trousdale, more drivers are using Arguello now.
Accessing her driveway is becoming more hazardous.
Mr. Barekat advised that the centerline needs to be replaced and he will request it. Comm. Cohen
asked if the increased traffic is due to the temple nearby. Mr. Roman stated no, it's due to avoidance
now of Trousdale and irrcreased school traffrc.
5.4 Dwight Road at kxington Way - Request for Stop Sign
Ms. Castello complained ofspeeders on Dwight Road. One driver went so fast, she crashed inJo her
front yard tree to avoid hiaing an on-coming car. She feels a stop sign would slow down drivers. Mr.
Barekat advised that there are existing Yield signs at this intersection.
5.5 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to detennire
whether traffic-calming rnqrsures are warranted
Officer Tamura submitted thek Selective Enforcement results which showed 15 citations issued and
three warnings.
5.6 Howard Avenue - Speed ad Trucks (e-mail)
5.7 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition)
Mr. Mufloz stated he lives on the 1400 block where the number of parked cars allows only one driving
lare so drivers go slow. Chair Mclver stated that construction trucks are a problem, too.
The Cityd Butlhgame Page 5
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
COMMISSION
Thursday, April 11 ,20oi2
from
reiterated tFt ttrere are nueqrous bli4 Sip aithis',ipteis,ection; and
Trrruydale D4vg
"1rd
elpnienAry Sa."rs w,ttkfiEiiirschoo-t;'it is a
; .'i:,. ij:-.- '.
.t.
4od he will
'sitb distance
Itwasmoved
,*.1$,.Tpood4 (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to recoqmed to Co.uncil to instal! a 3-way Stqp sryn at this
inte.qecfon. ,u,T*o*ly approved b1 fu cog-rmission. Mr. Erbacher ad'iifuc mat rdcr *ru
notlce'trereig1uo*ooaforthecodncil.actionmebting- ' ',.1 .,- 1".,,','', , ,
''-,
4.2.6 Dwrghr Road at kxington Way - ReqqesJ for {top,Sign, :.
Mr. F-bacler -ldvipd.ttrat rhe percentile sp@ is aq 30 mph, some of tk traffic ryas p_131-3gmph.
He stateiithat he will be working with the fiitioner tookiag at rrrffi" t .#.ioo ta rro",
down tbe traffic. He also rec,oppendeo aoaing sped limit signagg. gtrcer witt was present ad' stated that the accident at'ttris'site was a teat'aciiaentrad tbat ffist'of tt" t iiiil dveh at just
, !4der.30 pp!. Enfo4ement is discult sirce it is not includ$ in tbe_ Speed Survey. He
' '' iecomm€nded:eriforcement ano eaueation. Mr. Erbackir aavisedi'tnit'S"=fu'm*ting tin tn"
petitiorer tomorrow. This item will remain as an Aclarowledgment r**, , ; .
, 4.2.J 7415 Ar{etiqe Drive - Irtter regarding Traffrc Concerns related tq Sisg,'rg,of Mercy l.ocale
ftre riCident stated drive* are straddling the ceriterline and is corceineO abotrt.safery.iid'rfrrr
have been several accidents and many near-accifents. Officei Witt adiisdl'flLt *here ite roaO
bends it is somewhat deceptive and the lane appears narrower.who
straddle oenterlines are citable if it occurswithin 100 feet of an stated
that this is a police iszue, and ttrev bave been advised. Mr.
Vehicle Code for sections that do :urow citations.
Erb"r$j stated,ft w,9ug check the
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS.
5.1 Increased Traffic on Trousdale Drive due to Millbrae BART Station qbnin} "., ..,,':,.
,, lv{1.- Erbacher adviqed &at tlds petitioner is just sharing his thoughts orr the subjec!. Ng action reErired.,,,]
5.2 Request to change 2-Hour Parking Spaces to 2GMinute Spaces on East Side of 1800 Btock of
Magnolia Avenue
The petitioner stated that since the yoga site opened ,yagastudents qse the It parkins sDaces in frontof their stores for two hours at a time. The small businesses sn this bloc[-'live
"m-
Al" by their
customer's ability to park close to the business; so they are asking that the tiry limit for the I I parking ,. :._.'
Tlrc@ydBwtutgan e BS
- Re$pst for Stop Signs3-Way
, :-
.:i.t .
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
April 24, 2OO2
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
4c
5t20to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE DELETING ONE-HOUR PARKlNG AND ESTABLISHING TWO-HOUR
PARKING, THE EAST SIDE OF CARO LAN AVENUE FROM CADILLAC WAY TO BROADWAY
RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Council hold a public hearing to
1. Adopt the proposed ordinance.
2. Direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROLTND: AttheirmeetingsofMarch14andAprilll,2002,theTraffrc,SafetyandParkingCommission
(TSPC) considered a request from Mr. Mike Harveyto place two hour parking on Carolan Avenue adjacent to his
business at I 100 Carolan Avenue. At their April 1 1, 2002 meeting, the TSPC passed a motion recommending that
2-hour parking signs be placed at this location. A public notice ofthe TSPC meetings was sent to the adjaceniauto
businesses, and no objections were received.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Harvey stated that his business has the need for curb-enforced tumover curb parking every two hours. He hasjust completed reworking a portion of the frontage allowing for two added parking spaces due to driveway
closures. The area is posted in error for two-hour parking, as the existing ordinance states one hour. Adjacent
businesses have been noticed of this Council meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of installing additional new Two-Hour Parking signs and replacing one existing
sign is estimated to be $500. There are sufficient funds available in the City's current maintenance budget for thii
work.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Location Map; Aerial Photo; Copy of Notice Sent
TSPC Minutes for March 14 and April I1,2002
C. Erbacher, P.E.
Asst. Public Works Director
650-ss8-7230
cc: City Clerk, Police Department, Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission
Mr. Mike Harvey
S:\A Public Works Directory\StaffReports\Carolan ave 2-FIr Parking Cadillac to Broadway 5-6-02 2.wpd
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l1
t2
l3
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE No.
ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BT'RLINGAME
CHANGING TIIE PARKING LIMIT ON
NORTH CAROLAIT AVENT'E BETWEEN CADILLAC WAY AI\TD BROADWAY
FROM ONE HOUR TO TWO HOT]RS
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1 . The business and property owner adjacent to the area on North Carolan Avenue
between Cadillac Way and Broadway has requested that the time limit be changed from one hour
to two hours to better accommodate business uses in the area. The Traffic, Safety and Parking
Commission has recommended approval of this change.
Section 2. Section 13.36.030 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.030 One-hourparking.
Except where prohibited or otherwise designated for shorter term time periods, it is
unlawful for any person to park a vehicle for a period longer than one hour between the hours of
eight a.m. and six p.m. on any day, excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part ofthe following
streets or portions of streets:
(1) Broadway from El Camino Real to Califomia Drive;
(2) Burlingame Avenue, from California Drive to El Camino Real;
(3) California Drive, west side, from Douglas to Bellevue Avenue and from Carmelita
Avenue to Broadway;
(4) Ingold Road, north side, 48 feet west from the curb return of Rollins Road to 128 feet
west from that same curb refum.
Section 2. Section 13.36.040 is amended to read as follows:
13.36.040 Two-hourparking.
It is unlawful for the driver of any vehicle to park such vehicle, unless elsewhere in this title
otherwise provided, for a longer period than two hours between the hours designated any day,
excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part of the following streets, or portions of streets:
1
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
l0
1l
t2
13
l4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(a) Eight a.m. to six p.m.:
(1) Adrian Road, west side, one hundred fifty-five feet southerly from the southeast end of
the curb retum of David Road.
(2) Anita Road, west side, from Peninsula Avenue one hundred and forty-five feet north
toward Bayswater Avenue;
(3) Bayswater Avenue from El Camino Real to Park Road; south side, from California
Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way;
(4) Bellevue Avenue, except the south side from Primrose Road to Almer Road;
(5) Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side from Occidental to El
Camino Real;
(6) California Drive, west side, from Carmelita Avenue to three hundred feet south of
Sanchez Avenue; from Burlingame Avenue to Peninsula Avenue; from Oak Grove Avenue 400
feet northwards to 755 Califomia Drive, except areas designated for thirty minute parking;
(7) Capuchino Avenue from four hundred feet southerly to four hundred ninety-five feet
northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
(8) Carmelita Avenue, south side, from El Camino Real to Chula Vista Avenue;
(9) Carolan Avenue, west side, from Oak Grove Avenue to Burlingame Avenue; east side,
from one hundred feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet northerly of Toyon
Drive; and east side, from Cadillac Way to Broadway;
(10) Chapin Avenue, from Chapin Lane to El Camino Real;
( I I ) Chula Vista Avenue from the centerline of Broadway to four hundred ten feet southerly
of the centerline of Broadway;
(12) Douglas Avenue;
(13) East Lane, east side, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue;
(14) El Camino Real service road between Dufiflerin Avenue and Murchison Drive;
(15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from
Primrose Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; north side from Primrose Road to
Highland Avenue;
2
I
2
)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
t3
t4
15
16
t7
t8
t9
20
2t
22
Z3
24
25
26
27
28
(16) Laguna Avenue from two hundred eighty feet southerly to five hundred ten feet
northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
(17) LortonAvenue, westside, fromBayswaterAvenueto HowardAvenue; eastside, from
Howard Avenue one hundred twenty feet south toward Bayswater and forty feet north toward
Burlingame Avenue;
(18) Magnolia, west side, from Trousdale Drive toPlazalane;
(19) Occidental Avenue, from El Camino Real to Ralston Avenue;
(20) Paloma Avenue from three hundred ten feet southerly to one hundred thirty feet
northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
(21) Park Road, except the west side, from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
(22)Primrose Road, west side, from Howard Avenue to El Camino Real;
(23) Ralston Avenue, from Occidental Avenue to El Camino Real;
(24) Rollins Road from ninety feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet
northerly of Toyon Drive;
(25) South Lane, both sides;
(26) Trousdale Drive, north side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive and Califomia
Drive to ninety feet west of said curb return.
(b) Nine a.m. and four p.m.:
(l) Carmelita Avenue, north side, between Chula Vista Avenue and El Camino Real;
(2) Magnolia Avenue, east side.
Section 4 This ordinance shall be published as required by law
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6thday
of May, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting ofthe City Council held on the_day
3
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
13
l4
l5
t6
t7
18
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of__,2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BURllNGAMEU-ocal Settings\Temp\PARKZON5.wpd
City Clerk
4
Ls94:
PAR..
\
R oL Lr rt9
(o.tzt k)
P.t yd-tl reta
PARC
to&
G ARO L*f{
SOUTHERN F lft RAI
GALIFORNIA
a
Pn yu-j
?G,'
?AR I
PNYh"
a6 13
R66
6U5 9a'Q.tt
(
N
,oll c.otltrc. /alla &
lo,
ROLLIT{S RD.
lo6 tto,roc
-t
.8Frat (
(,
JJo
()
loal Cao,.LaL
/ol/ Oa..aa
toro
o.?3 *-
pa
s a2'za'-:
I
I
I
I =cl
oG
SH ORE
8ay
hatsc 5.'
V,t-.?t
t\'It
r#
o-r-x p,ot5Lr5
ctry G
1.*.
b:z+aA')PARCEL' 2
Px yol.tt, era-.- \
N-*.-
lotc
F
*-- //ooO.c r.-
G
,"t'
e s !$s
%
/oct
SEE SII€ET I8
/--
a)
CITY A COUNTY OF S
,oto
o.2t ,c-
The City of Burlingame
PI,BI.JC WORKS DEPARTMET{T
Tel:(6501 568-7230
Far(6501 68$93rO
CITY HAII . 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CAUFORNIA 94OIG3997
CORFORATION YARD
Tet(65O1 558-7670
www.
TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION IITEETING
7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 11,2002
City Hall, Gonference Room A,501 Primrose Road
The City ofBurlingame received arequestfor2-hourparking spaces alongthe newcurbing
at I100 Carolan Avenue.
This item will be a Discussion Item at the next Traffic Commission meeting on April I l,
2002, at7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, lst Floor, Conference
Room A.
You are welcome to attend this meeting. At the meeting attendees will have an
opportunity to speak and comment on their concerns. Your attendance, however, is not
r€quired for the Commission to consider this matter. The Commission may choose to
discuss and/or act on this request at this meeting. If you are unable to attend this meeting,
you may zubmit your written comments to Traffrc. Safety 4nd Parking Commission- 501
Primrose Ropd Burlingame. CA 94010. Your written comments will be submitted to the
Commission.
If you have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please catl
Frank Erbacher at 650-558-7230.
L
NOTICE
PUBLIC MEETING
TO DISCUSS INSTALLATION OF
2.HOUR PARKING AT 1{OO CAROLAN AVENUE
+,,')-
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
March 14,2OO2
Mr. Peters observed lot use and number of drop offs on various days: 2115, 7 cars in the lot, 49
cars dropped off1' 2118,7 cars in the lot, 3 on Peninsula; 2119,44 cars droppd off, 4 on
Peninsula; 2120,4 cars picked up, 5 cars on Peninsula, spaces available in lot. Believes owner
should asphalt dirt area in lot and re-stripe making 12 spaces. This wottld make a green zone on
Bloomfield unnecessary. At 5:15 p.m. there are cars parking on westboud Peninsula across from
the restaurants a few blocks eastward, and there's no safety issue there. Even with a green zone
on Btoomfield, people will park on Peninsula. Parking in the evening on the San Mateo side is
available. Ms. Richardson measured the school's lot which is 32' wide by 50' long; and with
space needd for cars to back up, no more spaces can be added. The owner stated that there is no
need to asphalt the dirt area because parents already use that area anyway. She has 68 kids in
school being dropped offand picked up everyday. Ms. McCleary asked if traffrc safety overrides
school safety. She has noticed that traffic on Peninsula has increased in the last l0 years; and
feels, we nlust compromise. Stre likes the green zone on Bloomfield with tire limitation. Even
though cars will stop and wait to circle for space on Bloomfield, residents should use tlreir own
driveways and garages rather than the City street for parking. Ms. Abbey stated the residents have
a right to have parking spaces available on their street for visitors.
Mr. Erbacher advised that if a green zone is irstalled on Bloomfield, it would be timed for the
peak period. Ttre centerline on Peninsula may be able to be moved by making the curb lane 12 feet
wide and the other lane 10 feet wide. Mr. Barekat suggested the possibility of a special meeting
for this issue be held before ttre regular April meeting since we have no quonrm this evening.
4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.2.1 1240 Paloma Avenue - Irtrer regarding Blue Handicapped Zone
The petitioner was present and stated that they have a two-car garage for their two cars; but her
husban<l's work truck is too long for the driveway. He is perrnanently disabled, so they're asking
for a blue zone close to theii house so he doesn't have to walk far after work every night. They
noticed that there is a blue zone also on the 1300 block of Paloma.
4-2.2 1100 Carolan - ktter regarding mainaining existing 2-hour parking ad adding 2-hour
parking along new curbing
Petitioner was not present.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS.
5.1 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extension
Joe Cowan of the SFPUC stated that an employee at another site was killed when stuck by a car while
exiting ttrat site's driveway. This site was surveyed ard they deterrrined that they need an extension
of one existing red zone 1s sliminate parking near the driveway which would facilitate exiting the
5
The City dBudingame Page4
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Thursday, April 11 ,2002
2. PI"EDGE OF ALIEGTANCE TO THE FLAG:
3. ROLL C.ALL: 5 of 5 Cornmissioners presedt.
4.1 AC:IION ITEMS.
4.1-1 Mihute;forFebruary 14,?,W2',wefesubmittdadapproved.:MinutesforMarch l4,ZWz
' were siibmittd for record purposes only since therdwas no quo..,--*for t6is ;;in;- --
4-l-2 1710 Trousdale Drive - Red Cross rgquests Relocation of Existing Green Znne
. :
"'''li' :i:'' 'Mr- Er.bacher'advised that the petitiorer had changetl their roquest ftom a red:.i6de,to relocationofitlrc gre€n zone which has ben cornpleted. :,, .. , :
,.'
4,13''Installaiion of a Green Zone on'Bloomfield Road,noith of peni*ula.Avenue, .i
The'preschool or\frrer obtained a,co,pj of ,a.bluepriirt'of the prope(y.which iirdicates that theproperty next door at7l0 Peninsula Avenue is part of their p*tiog rea; airdsilrh" *rid;will be moving out in a month, the preschool will not need ; groiro* at all and withdrcw this
4.2 DISCUSSION MEMS.
4.2.1 l24o Paloma Avenue - r,etter regarding Blue Hadicapped Zone
k. Erbach-e-r hadlmeasuredithe site'ad there-is'limited parking in.the driveiiay.rT6 residentcottld drive to his parked tnrck or modry the garage to "rto*-&Cte more space.'c oi*r. u.y",suggested the residenlcoul{ gark his tnrck crosswise in th" dri;; d.-ihir will be continuedto next month since the petitiorer was not present to submit testimoiy. -
..t. .'--,
4'2'2 ll00 Carolan - Lrtter r-qgarding maintaining existing 2-hoqrparking and adding 2-hourparking along new curbing . :
Petitioner' Mike HarvGy, stated"2-hour piirking signage exists noal hit it is unenforcd; and localemplovees, park dt dar'tbsre.,tn"y'*& puldqg-.#t"btfit f.o' tnei.:a";;: N"ffiffi
Eas been addd with the rew constnrction which allows *r" [gurrg rg"6[,
-"rp*auy^if
CarclaoAvenue northboud lam were narrowed just south or rroiawry sgt. cou", advised that thparking limit is rlot property sigued so they carmot'issue tickea. Mr. Erbacher advistid that tnop:lrking spaces could be added; and it should be a two-hour lirnit, but an ordinance is needed toeffect the 2-hour limit- rt was movetl and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Evans) to *or rh#;Action item immediately- Unanimously approvd by the commission. It; then rmved ad
Page3
TlrcCItycfBtnfrngolrc
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:N p.m. by Chair Mclver.
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING'COiUMISSION ' ' . .. '
Meeting Minutes - UnaPProved
Thursday , April 11,2442
seonded (Comms. Mayer/Evans) to recomue.d to Corrcil to effect a 2-hour parking limit and
i6tall proper signage. Unanimously approved by,the Coqmission; lrr*.'Eq,bacher advisg4 tqa*t the
ordinance will be introduced at the May 6e Courcil meeting.
.:.'- . -.: '' '.
4.2-3 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extensiore, including Fronti4g 1ffi3 *d lfils
Rollins Road and Relocation of Red Curb Opposite 1660 and,l634.Rollins,Road' ' r.
Petitioner, Mr. Cowan, stated tlrey have 30 vehicles, and cars parked to,ttE leftsf,their driv.-eways
block their site when exiting- Their kalth aod safety organization evaluated the site and regested
r rhe exisring r,ed zom be ex{edd th futl length of th bleck,.gqpqcialty sirye Rollins,R.oad traffic
. moves. faster than th postcd 35 mph",Mr- Ctwan,requeste4 {@!,i!$eir health and safety
organi-ation be able to attend the meeting next month to make a formal presentation
Mr. Erbacher advised that rnost driveways along Rollins Road bdve a 70-foot red zone on tk left
.,side enabling good.vislt ilrty inexiting.-This site dqq4:t have a condnu.olrq rd zone. fire south
driveway has the biggest problem when tnrcks lErk to.the lcftand soqe e-ven Ule tbe red zolp to
park. It was moved and secoded (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to move this item to an Action item
immeAiatefy. Unaoimor5ly approved by tlre Copmission- ThiS will be an Actionftem oext month.
4.2.4 1309 North Carolan.Avenue - Requestfor Rd or,Yellosr Zore atrRear,of 1305 ad 1309
-: Rollins Road
'".i' i ;1,-
,.r l
l'ne- petitioner, Mr. IVoog; stated there is an alley betwen 13(D and 1313 Rollim-ald he has
truct/trailers 63 feet long which have trouble turning into the il"y; so ad{rng a yellow zone
would make it easier for them to pull h anil out. From the floor,iManager,of 1309,Rollim Road
stated he has six spaces for his customers so his six employees park elsewhere. He disagrm with
removal of parking spaees, Ivfanager. of 1307 Rollins,Road sta.ted theJ.need spacesfor eryloyee
parking. Manager of l33l Rollins Road submitted a written note disagreeing with adding a red
or ydlgmrzore..The qiglnaldeveloper of the proper,tyi, 1305-1'331 RO.!!ins Road, exlilained that
the. re are six busindses.shar-fug &is site.wi& 38"4r&i4g slraaes o,n site e .nd'aq average of 25:30
employees. He,estimates that there afe,100 customers a day, He feds that a red or,y-ellow zore
causing the loss of ttrrep-,or f6ur spaces wo.uld be very b{d.and,recomtrnds detriial of request.
Manager of 1335 Rollins Road stated parking is a proble4 now ad to eliminate spaces to
aqgg{udate seqds.is wro4g-.,Mr- Woag. stated k.@s two spaces ad.t}attwo gars-tave been
, 1, , i;,,! Comm, Evam wants to visjt the,site beforc be discussosrthe rqrqqtr Thii wilI.'be.a Disctlssion
:.-,:'. , Itemnextmonth. Mr. Erbacher,advisdthatstaffwillrclrcgicethe,reiglbor qfor,oextmoirth's
';: ',. .;.,.' meeting..'i;,, -::,tt1.;,
heCfVdBwhgane Page 4
-t
TO:
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BY
BY
SUBIVIITTED
APPROVEI}
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE
6c
5.20.02
ry.-
TY PROGRAM TO 2OO4
DATE:14.
FROM:
SUBIECT: AMEND ZONING CODE TO EXTEND SECONI)
ACTION
The council should review the proposed zoning amendment which would extend the current second unit
amnesty program from June lO, ZOiOZto June ia, ZOO| and require applicants to make any required
improvements to eligible second rnit, *ithi, on. y.u, of city action. To introduce the ordinance for second
,.uaing and public hiaring at your meeting of June 3,2002, Council should'
A. Request city clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance.
B. Waive further reading of the ordinance'
C. Introduce the proposed ordinance'
D. Direct ttre citv clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed
adoPtion.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
At their meeting on May 13, zooz,ttt piunning commission held a public hearing and voted on a voice vote
7-0-0 to recommend that the City Council extJnd the time frame foiaccepting applications for amnesty for
existing second dwelling units in the R-1 zone built before January 1,1954; and give applicants one year to
do any construction required to make trr. uppiored unit safe and sanitary. In their discussion commissioners
noted that it was i-portant to continue tti, rur..rsful program but since the Housing Element includes a
review of the program requirements, a two year extension was suffrcient at this time'
CODE COMPLIANCE
General plan: program complies with General Plan development policy and the provisions of the currently
effective Housing" Elemeni. The Second Unit lmnesty program is also being considered as an
implementation tooT in the proposed draft 2001-2006 Housing Element'
Zoning:This program affects only properties zoned R-1, single family residential'
cEeA Status: Article 19. categorically Exempt per section: Article 19. categorically Exempt per Section:
15332 - In-Fill Development p-rojects, clur, 32'consists of projects characterized as in-fill development
meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) The projecf is tonsistent with the applicable general plan
designation and all applicable general ptan poiiiiel -as well as with applicable zoning designation and
regulations; (b) The proposed a.r.tofrnJ"t o."u11 within city limits on a- project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare
A]YIEND ZONING CODE TO EXTEND SECOND UNITAIINESTY PROGRA]YI TO 2OO4 May 20,2002
or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to trafftc,
noise, air quality, or water quality; (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public
services.
BACKGRQUND:
In June of 2001, the City Council initiated a new program, second dwelling unit amnesty in the R-l zone, as
an implementation of the 1994 Housing Element. The purpose of the program was to conserve and to make
safe and sanilary existing second units which had been approved by the city and built before 1954, when city
regulations q-hanged and such units were no longer allowed in the R-l zone. At initiation the program was
approved for two years. Applications would be accepted in the first year July 2001 to June 2002, and
applicants would be given until June 2003 to apply for a building permit and complete improvements to make
the approved units comply with the Housing Code. Without amendment to the zoning code the Planning
Department will not be able to accept applications for this program after June 30,2002.
There have been about 8 requests for second unit amnesty. All but two have completed the review process.
Of the two remaining one has an on-site parking issue to resolve and one was not built before 1954. While the
program has;tarted slowly, it appears to be effective. No neighbors have protested the applications which
have been circulated. The property owners have actively participated in inspections and have followed up
with necessary repairs.
In the recent public review of the 2001-2006 Draft Housing Element, the Second Dwelling Unit Amnesty
Program wap recognized for its benefit in maintaining smaller, more affordable housing units in the city's
housing stock. In fact one of the work programs suggested in the 2001-2006 Housing Element is that this
program be reviewed for its potential to be expanded.
In light of its role in the Draft Housing Element's work program, it has been suggested by the Planning
Commissioq that the current progfam be extended for only two years e.g. applications could be accepted until
June 30, 2004. Further extension could be considered as apart of the review ofthe program's requirements in
the first year implementation program for the 2001-2006 Housing Element.
The proposefl changes to the current regulations governing second unit amnesty (Chapter 25.59) are
l. Applications for approval of an existing second unit shall be made before June 30, 2004; and
2. Applicant shall receive a certificate of occupancy within one year of city approval of the special
ilermit allowing the second unit.
The ProposedChanges to the Zoning Code: Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program paper
attached describes the wording changes and provides annotation explaining the reasons fir each change
proposed. A copy ofthe proposed ordinance is also attached.
ATTACHMENTS:
Planning Commission StaffReport, May 73,2002, with attachments.
Proposed Changes to the Zoning code: Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program
Planning Commission Minutes April 22, 2OOZ
Ordinance
City of Burlingame
Amend Zoning Code to Extend Seconil anit
AmnestY Program
Meeting I)ate: 05.13 -02
Request: Arnend ZonngCode Section 25. 59.080 to extend the time frame for accepting applications
for amnesty for oristing second units in the R-l zone built before 1950; and give applicants
one year to do any construction required to make the approved unit safe and sanitary.
General plap: program complies with General Plan development policy and the provisions of the
currently effective Housing Element. The Second Unit Amnesty program is also being considered as an
implementation tool in the proposed drafr2Dl-2006 Housing Element.
Zoning-.This program affects only properties zoned R-1, single family residential.
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per
Section: 157;31 - In-Fill Development Projects: Class 32 consists of projects charac/rerrrd as in-fill
development meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) The project is consistent with the
appticaUte general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable
,;niog desi-gration and regulations; (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project
site oino more than five acres zubstantially zurrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no valug
as habitat forendangered, rare or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not rezult in any
significant efus relating to traffig noisg air quality, or water quality; (e) The site can be adequately
served by all required utilities and public services.
Summary:
On June 30i,2W2, we will have to stop taking applications for legalizing existing second residential
units built beforel954, in the R-l zone. Since this prograrn is just taking off and the Draft llousing
i' Element advocates its continuation, staff would zuggest that we act immediately to qrtend the time
penod for accepting new applications. As discussed at the joint City Council/?lanning Commission
meeting in February now that we have some experience with the program we may wantto change some
of the iequirementr. fni* review and possible change to the requirerrents can be addressed as a part of
the first year implementation program for the 2OOI-2Cfl6 Housing Element. The present nrggwtion is
simply to extcnd the present progam so that it can continue to serve the commurrity while we are
evaluating a4d rwising it, ifnecessary.
;.
Extending the current program also requires that a deadline be established for property owners to
make repairs so that the second unit is safe and sanitary. As it now stands (see attachedZotng Code
Chapter 25.59), property owners had one year in which to make application (June 30,2OOl to June 3Q
ZOO2) and then one year within which to make the needed corrections (Iune 3O,2OOZ to June 30,2AA3).
The premise of the current regulation is that one year is zufficient time for property owners to get a
building permit, make repairs identified to make the unit safe and sanitary and to have the improvements
inspected by the city Building Deparhnent. In general repairs should be minor; major sfuctural
additions to the second unit are not allowed by the present regulations. Based on the crrrrent
provisions, the extension of time frame for the program also rquires that the requirernents be clarified
Item
Amenitt*e coileb Ertendthe Time Frune offie second llnitAnmesty hogron May 13' 2002
that applicar$s have one year from date of city approval of a second unit, to complete any required
i*prov"r.nti. If the improvements have not been inspected by the city within a year, the approval for
that second unit will "*pir". There will be no limit on the number oftimes a property owner may apply
for amnesty for a given-unit. The down side to the owner will be that the requirements of the Housing
Code which is used by the city for inspection purposes may change over time. So he may need to make
more repairs or improvements to meet safe and sanitary standards at a later date.
Study
The Commission reviewed the proposed change to the second unit amnesty regulations at their meeting
on April 22, 2N2. @C Mnutes April 22, 2OOZ) Commissioners asked the following:
o Could theprogrambe extended for onlytwo years (to lune 30,2004) instead of the four years
proposed (Iune 30, 2006X
Staffsuggested an extension for four years so that the progftLm would run with the time frame of
theZQOl-2006 Housing Eleme,lrt. Another option would be to make it permanent (have no
expiration d"te), which would insure that an oversiglrt would not resuh in the program being
iniOvertentty droppd because we failed to note that it was expiring. Certainly it can be
extended for two years at this time and considered for renewal 18 months from now. Since
there is a priority to review the criteria over the next year, a recommendation on the time frame
ofthe progftrm could be made at that time. What is important arrrently is that the program not
lapse.
o How are we promoting this program?
Presently we have posted information about the Second Unit Amnesty program on the City's
web site. In addition there are filers posted in City Hall and at the Library. When we initiated
the program about a year agq we put advertisements in the San Mateo County Times. There
have been over time a number of news stories on the program, including the Chanrber
Newsletter. The progla4.was advertised in the Su.mmer 200I.Recreation Brochure. Finally,
we put a note promoting the program in lune/July 2001 water bill of each city resident. Staff
would suggest that if the program is extended we do another round of promotion for the
program.
Proposed Changes
Based on the Commission comments at study, the draft ordinance before you at public hearing proposes
to exte,nd the program for two years to June 30, 2OO4. No changes were made to the proposal ttrat
property owrrers be given one year in which to comply; and failure to make required re,pairs within that
time frame will result in expiration of the approval. Subsequent applications for the same unit will be
treated as if it were a new application.
Program Co$s
The only feep charged the applicant for this permit is an inspection deposit fee of $375. Applicants also
pay $70 to cover noticing. The actual cost for inspections seems to be closer to $135. the remainder is
2
Amendflte Code to Ertendthe Ttne Frwte of the Second UnitAmnesly hagrort Mqt 13' 2002
refunded. Noticing costs are not refunded if the application is withdrawn after it has been noticed-
There is no charge for stafftime with this program.
Planning Cqmmission Action
The planning Commission should hold a public hearing on the proposed change to the Second Unit
Amnesty regulations. The action is a recommendation to City Council-
Attachments:
proposed Ch3nges to the ZonngCode: Amendment to the Second Unit Amnesty Progranq Annotated
April29,20OZ
Planning Commission Minutes, Aprtl 22, 2002
Ordinance
t-
3
Apil 29,2002
Proposed Changes to the ZoningCode
Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program
Attlre Joint City CouncillPlanning Commission meeting in February 2C0l3, the intention
to have full leview ofthe Second Unit Amnesty Program was set as an implementation
priority forthe 2}Ol-2f[l6HousingElement. The City should adoptthe 2001'2006
ifousing Element in June or July. Unfortunately the Second Unit Amnesty program is
pr.r.ntl-y structured that the city cannot take applications after lune 30,2A02. In order to
"tlo* the program to continug this ordinance revision would extend the time frame for
accepting and processing applications. Later in the year the Planning Commission will
review possible changes to the requirements for second unit amnesty
The code changes to extend the time frame for,accepting applications for second unit
amnesty follow. Each change in annotated to clari$ the purpose of the proposed change.
Code Section 25.59.080 Time frame.
Now reads:
Applications for approval of a special permit shall be made on orbefore June 30, 2W2.
Any approved special permit that has not complied within the time requirements
contained in this section shall lapse and be of no further force and effect on June 30,20A3
Proposed wording:
Applications for approval of a special permit shall be made on orbefore June 3A, 2006.
Any approvad special permit that has not comBlied mtdreceived a certificate of
**porcywit}in one (1) yeu of city qprwal action on the special permil shall lapse
and be ofno further force and effect.
Annotationi
When staff noted that the current amnesty program would expire June 30,
2002, staff suggested that the expiration date of the program be extended
to the life of the 2001 -2006 Housing Element because the second unit
amnesty program is a fundamental program in implementation of the city's
housing pqlicy. At study before the Commission, several commissioners
suggested that the program should not be extended for so long, indicating
that perhaps a two year extension at this time might be more appropriate.
(Planning C,ommission minutes April 22,2OOZ). The proposed revision to
the code has been changed to reflect a two year extension. If this change
is limited to two years, staff would suggest that a longer extension, at
Proposed Cbages to the Zoning Code:Amendment to Exterd thesecondUnit &trn€sty Program
AVil29,2@.2
least to coincide with the 2001-2006 Housing Element, should be
considered when the entire program is reviewed as apart of next year'S
Housing Element implementation work program'
The new wording proposes two changes to the time frame for applying for
amnesty for an existing second unit built before 1950. The first change is
to accept applications for the next three years (to June 30, 2005)' The
second change is to require those who are approved to complete any
required physical improvements to make the unit safe and sanitary and
have them inspected by the Building Department within a year of city
approval of the unit. This follow up is important since one of the primary
reasons for making existing second units conforming is to insure that
they are safe and sanitary for those who live in them'
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
Monday, Apil22,2002
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the Monday, Apil22,z002,regulm meeting ofthe
Planning Commission to order at7:A2p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele,
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Momoe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson
ilI. MINruTES The minutes of the April 8, 2002 meeting regular of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
IV. APPROVAL'OX'AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
YI. STTiDY ITEMS
2303 TROUSDALE DRTVE _ ZONED R-1 _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR A PRTVATE NON-PROFIT SCHOOL ON AN EXSTING SCHOOL SITE
(ERUDITE.HOPE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, APPLICANT; KASTROP GROUP, NC., ARCHITECT;
BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLA}..{NER:
ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staffreport.
Commissioners asked: what time in the morning do the various classes at Franklin Elementary begin in the
morning? Ifthe new class is to be held in the computer lab, where will.the lab be relocate{ will it.be within
the leased area? How will the taffic generated by the change compare to the current taffic generated by this
use and the school; how does the additional traffic affect the congestion experienced at Franklin at the start
of the school day now? Does the proposed 9:15 a.m. start conflict with the Franklin classes that begin at
9:30 a.m.? Has the principal at Franklin been consulted aboutthe change in start time? Have there been any
complaints about the current student drop offlpick-up practices? There were no further questions.
This item was set fortheconsentcalendarwhen all theinformationhas been submittedandreviewedbythe
Planning Depmhnent. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m.
I
$,AMEI\D REGTJLATIONS TO EXTEND SECOIYDT]I\IIT AMI\TESTY PROGRAM
PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staffreport, noting that this request was just to extend the present
program so that the momentum created will continue. After the Housing Element is updatd the Second
Unit program will be reviewed more completely and more extensive revisions to the program will be
considered.
April 22, 2002
Commissioners asked: could the extension be for 2 years rather than the 5 yems proposed? How are we
promoting this program? Want to extend progr,rm in order to support and encourage it, but also want to be
clear that still intend to review and consider modifications to make it better.
Chairrran Vistica set this item for action at the next Planning Commission meeting, May 13,2002.
This item concluded at7:16 p-m.
VTI. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Itums on the consent calendqr are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Chairrran Vistica asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item offthe
consent calendar. There were no requests.
3A. 330 CLARENDON ROAD - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STE}YARI STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICA}.IT AND
ARCHITECT; JERRY AND JORDANA PEIL, PROPERTY OWNERS) (69 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: CATTIERINE KEYLON
38. 1320 SI(WIEW DRTVE - ZONED R.l . APPLICATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF AN
APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A}I ATTACIIED GARAGE FOR A
FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (SAMUEL A}{D ELAINE WONG, APPLICA}ITS AND
PROPERTY OWNERS; JOHN MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (44 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staffreports, commissioners
comments and the findings in the staffreports with recommended conditions in the staffreports and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it
passed 7-0-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:16 p.m.
V[I. REGT}LAR ACTION ITEM
4.1540 HOWARD AYEI\IT]EI ZOXEN R.l _ APPLrcATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT
AND ARCHITECT; EARL GUSTAFSON, PROPERTY OWNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLA}.INER:
SEAN O'ROIIRKE
Reference staffreport,04.22.02, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners had no questions of staff.
Chairman Vistica opened the public heming. Eml Gustafson, I 540 Howard, property owner r€presented the
project. He noted that in working on the design they extended the rem wall 2 feet inorder to be able to
include an oversized bath tub, They also increased the dormer to break up the wall along the driveway and
added knee braces; relocated the bedroom window to allow for the larger dormer. There were no other
comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
2
City of B,trlrngame Planning Commission Unapprwed Minutes
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-9
10
lt
t2
13
t4
15
t6
17
18
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
t
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINAIYCE O[' TIIE CITY OF' BT]RLINGAME
EXTEI\DING TIIE AMI\TESTY PERIOD ATID SPECIAL PERMIT PROCESS FOR
SECOI\IDARY DWBLLING UI\ITS IN THE CITY
The CITY COUNCIL of the CffY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section I . In May 2001 , the City adopted Ordinance No. 1653, which established an
amnesty program for secondary dwelling units built before January l, 1954. The response to that
amnestyprogram has been very limited, so the Citywishes to extend that amnestyprogram so that
more participation will occur.
Section 2. Section 25.59.040(a) is amended to read as follows:
(a) Any person owning a secondary dwelling unit that was built as a dwelling unit not later
than December 31, 1953, and that has been in substantially the same use and envelope since that
time may apply to the city no later than June 30, 2006, for a special permit to legalize the existence,
use, and occupancy of the secondary dwelling unit pursuant to this chapter.
Section 3. Section 25.59.080 is amended to read as follows:
25.59.080 Time frame.
Applications for ffiroval of a special permit shall be made on or befrrre lune 3O 2006.
Any approved specialpermit thathas not complied within the time requirements contained in this
section shall lapse and be of no further force and effect on June 30,2007.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City ofBurlingame, do hereby certiff that the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day
I
.l
I
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
13
t4
15
16
t7
l8
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of--, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day ot- 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
C:\Fll!:)ORDINANC\econdrmit2.pln.vpd
2
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May L4,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
6b
5 t20to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND ENFORCEMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council retain the existing hours of construction for work
performed under a building permit.
BACKGROUND: Council and staff have received an e-mail from Mr. VandenBrink regarding consffuction noise.
Mr. VandenBrink lives adjacent to an on-going, owner-built project at l42l Benito Avenue and indicates that he is
unable to enjoy his property on weekends and holidays due to excessive consffuction noise. He is also concerned that
the Police Deparftnent does not adequately enforce the existing ordinance with respect to consffuction hours.
Mr. VandenBrink believes that Burlingame's construction hours are liberal in comparison to other jurisdictions and
recommends that they be reduced on Saturdays. He further recommends that work under a building permit not be
allowed on Sundays and holidays.
DISCUSSION:
Houns oF woRK
Staff researched the limitations onhours of construction in 19 jurisdictions in San Mateo County. The results, shown
in the attached survey and analysis, demonstrate ttrat Burlingame is average or more restrictive in permitted hours
in almost every category (weekdays, Saturday, Sunday, start and stop times, and total hours). Only three jurisdictions
(Atherton, Belmont and Woodside) prohibit all construction on Sundays and holidays; and of the remaining
jurisdictions, only San Mateo has a later starting time.
ENroRcptvtsNr
Staff has reviewed the past three years of requests for Police Departrnent response to noise complaints in the City.
Overall, the police responded to about 6,200 calls regarding noise disturbances. Forty-two calls appear to relate to
construction noise between 4:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.; and, of these, 19 appear to be in an R-l zone or have an
apparent effect on an R-l zone. Approximately one-half of these calls related to work that would require a
construction permit from the City. Of all the construction-related noise calls, six involve construction on a Sunday
or holiday; and two of these were in an R-l district. Staff also reviewed the Code Enforcement investigations over
the past four years and found two construction-related noise calls: one involving work at an office building and the
other involving Pacific Bell work on Hillside Drive.
The Police Depatrnent attempts to respond to all calls for service regarding noise disturbances. Officers will first
determine the nature of the possible violation and make contact with the reporting party (if available and willing) and
then with the possible offender. Most of these are resolved when the person making the noise is informed of the
problem or the time limitations. If the person making the noise does not comply and additional response is needed,
officers can issue citations. In some cases, the officer is not able to issue a citation because he/she did not witness
the noise occurring or simply did not believe there was sufficient information or basis to issue a citation. In those
instances, a report is sent to ttre City Attorney's office for review and follow up.
Page 2
SUMMARY:
Given the needs of a homeowner performing his/her own work, the rights of neighbors to reasonable peace in the
early mornings and evenings and everyone's interest in expediting projects to completion, it appears that the current
hours provide a reasonable balance and are in alignment with San Mateo County jurisdictions. In addition, research
indicates that there are very few calls regarding consffuction-related noise in and adjacent to residential areas; and
the Police Departrnent has been able to resolve most of these by talking to the affected parties.
Staff believes that the noise issue at l42l Bemto Avenue is a special circumstance involving a long term weekend
construction project which does not merit modifying construction hours for the entire City. Rather, staff believes that
this issue can best be addressed through a mediation process. As a result, Police Commander Tom Marriscolo met
with Mr. Funghi, the owner-builder, and adjacent neighbors, Mr. VandenBrink and Mrs. Cody, on May 7,2002,
to mediate an acceptable solution to the noise issue. Several agreements were made at the meeting, and the Police
Department will continue to monitor the situation and be available to facilitate any further mediation.
Staff also met with Mr. Vanderbrink on May 14,2002, to discuss the attached survey of consffuction hours prepared
by the Chief Building Official. At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. VanderBrink indicated that, irrespective of his
situation, he still believes that residents should not be exposed to construction noise on Sundays.
EXHIBITS: Mr. VandenBrink's E-Mail; Construction Hours Survey and Analysis
BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budget impact to the City.
6s0-558-7230
c: City Clerk, Police Department, Fred Cullum (Chief Building Official)
Mr. VandenBrink, l4l2 Alvarado Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
Mr. Funghi, I42l Benito Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
Mrs. Cody , 1416 Alvarado Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reporu\Construction Hours.wpd
PWIENG-Bagdon, George
From:
Sent:'- To?
Cc:
Randy VandenBrink [vandenbr@pacbell.netl
Frk ay, March 22,2002 3:49 PM
council@bu.lingame.org
Janice VardenBrink ydoc@pacbell.net; Fcullum@hirlingam€.org; PWENe,Bagdon,
George; ATW-Anderson, Lany
Burlingsme Conslrudion HoursSubiec{:
lmpo anc6:Hish
city Council of Burlingame
501. Primrose Rd
Burlingame, cA 94 010
Dear council Memlrers,
f would like to request that the counci-I take under consjderation a
revision to the allowable hours of constructlon for Burllngame, Burlingame
today, has (l.)the least restllctive hours of constructlon of all the towns
on the Peninsula, (2) a very poor definltion of !,rhat ' constltutes
construction and (3) what appears to be a total lack of enforcenent of it's
exJ-sting rules.
Background
On my block we have been subjected Eo almost constant 7 day a week
construction for over a year and a half due to several ' coDstruction jobs,ilost have worked during the week and adhered to the allowed hours of
construction. llowever, in Apri.l of 2000 the Planning Comnission approved a
5900 square foot house on a 8000 square foot lot at 1421 Benito. The owuer
of that house had lobbied his neighbors for support stating that hl-Eintentiols were to be done by Christma6. Instead the owner, who is acting ashis own contractor, has ONLY worked weekends and Holidays and has
consistently vioLated the exiating haurs of construction in excess of 30
times. I and seweral of my nelghbors have discussed his violatioos of the
hours of construclion with him, but seem to be j-gnored each time. Afterseveral of these dlscussions we have started to notify the Burlingame Pollceof each infraction. I have cal.Led the police 6-7 times, and L-.krrow my
neighbors have called a sinilar nunber of times. Ilowever, it appears thatthe Burllngame police have a poLicy to not wrLte citations. In fact on
Sqnday, Uarch 10th, the officer that responded specifically toLd ny
neighbors that they were wasting his 'tj,me in making these calls, and that he
had better thlngs to do. Ilhen I asked whether the violators were ever cltedI rdas informed that I vre donit do thatr. ObviousLy a ordinance that is not
enforced has little value.
corq)arisoDs
In researching what the policy of other citiea on the Peninsula are j.n thisarea I discovered several areas where Burlingame's code needs to be
upgraded. First Burlingame alLows the second highest nu0ber of hours ofconstructioB of aLl the cities that I surveyed. I obtained the hours ofconstructlon either from the police or building web pages and or by callingthe police or building depaltnent of tlrese clties.
-otal - Hours- The average al]-o$ed hours of coDstruction for the 13 citles
1-,urveyed vras 60,5. Burlinga[e a11ows 77 hours or 28 percent more than mostci.ties in our a.rea.
1
Monday-Eriday Hours- Burlingame again a1lows the longest, both earLiest and
latest, period of constructlon of all the cities surveyed. The average
period across all the cities is 7130 am to 6100 pm. Burlingame allows 7 to
7.
Saturday - Again Burlingame has the distinction of allowing the fatest stop
time and the highest nurnber of hours. Five cities prohibit Saturday
construction, the rest average a 8:45 start time and a 5 pm stop. Burlingamejust changed to 9 am to 5 pm.
Sunday and Holidays - Eleven of the L3 jurisdictions totally ban
cotrstruction on Sundays and Holidays. OnIy Hillbrae and Burling€rme allow it!
The following table shows the city by city corrparison.
City Total M-F Sat Sun/Holiday
Burlingame
Millbrae
Hillsborough
Menl-o Park
San Mateo City
San Mateo County
Lsir Altos
Atherton
Mountain View
Redwood City
Sunnlruale
!{oodside
Palo A].to
7am-?pm7:30am-7pm8am-5pm8am-5pm7am-7pm7am-6pm
7 am - 5:30 pm8am-5pm7am-5pm7am-8pm7am-6pm
7:30am - 5r30pm8am-6pm
9am-6pm
8am-6pm
10am-5pm
Prohibited
9 am- S-pm
9am*5pm
9am-3pm
Prohibited
Perrnit Needed
Prohibited
8am-5pm
Prohibited
9am-6pm
1.0am-5prn
8am-6pm
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibi-ted
Prohibited ( ? )
Prohibited
Prohibited
Perruit Needed
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
77
77.5
52
45
68
63
58.5
45
55
65
64
55
59
Proposal for hours of Construction
I would propose that Burlingame change it's allowable hours of construction\- to the foll-owi-ng periods of time.
Monday - Friday 7:00 am to 6 pm
Saturday 1.0 am to 4 pm
Sunday / Holidays Prohibited
This would put Burlingame slightly above the average of total hours for thecities surveyed. My rational for these hours is as follows:
t"{:-E -= Residents have a rlght to be able to have their neighborhood free ofnorse and construction activity during meal time, especially dinner. rbelieve a 5 pm stop would allow most farnllies to have a more peacefuldinner. In addition it would clear the streets of construction activity bythe time most people get home from work.
Saturday - one should be able to not be woken up on Saturdays by constantconstruction noise. fn addj-tion since Saturday evening is the tj-me that asignificant amount of entertaining occurs one should be able to freely useyour house and yard. For the last year and a half every outdoor party thatmy wife and I have held has been intemupted by construction noise. I feelthat r have the right to enjoy my house and yard without such a ongoingnui-sance. The late stop time is especially annoying since one is unable toplan any social events.
Sunday and Holidays- There needs to be one day a week where one is free fromhaving to worry about hanuners and sawing and constant construction activity.Over the last 2 years we have endured construction on the Fourth of JuIylwice, we have had Thanksgiving dinner to the sound of Bobcat demolition
\_ nce, on Christmas we have had to wonder whether we would or would not have- construction noise. A11 other Holidays have been held to the sound of sawsand harnmers, etc. We are in the position of having to leave home to avoi-d
2
. tfte nuisance. I do not believe that any Burlingame resident should even have
to worry about this on Sundays and Holidays'
Definition of Construction- There must be an aEreed upon definition of what
construction is, not a series of differring opioions by police officers and
residents.
tos Altos defines the criteria as tsuch that the sound therefrom creates a
noise dlsturbance across a residential property line ...' This definition
means that cleanup, loading unloading, and prep work that can be heard must
fit within the allowable hours. The contractor qannot unload lumber for an
hour before and clean up an hour later than the posted times.
Atherton and Hiltsborough also define construction in terms of being able to
hear activity across the property line. Several cltes have very defined
decibel levels. In many it is any work that is beinq done under a building
pennit.
I believe that a sirqple definition of any activity that can be heard or seen
across the property line makes the most sense. It is sirtple and
understandable. It is inrportant that the exact activities do not matter. A
bobcat unloading and moving materials, a truck with back-up bells, or clean
up working throwing scraps in a duqpster, or a street fu}l of construction
vehi"les are as disturbing as a --w and hanmer.The definition needs to be
such that there are not 6 workers on site an hour before of after the
defined allowable times.
Enforcement- Whatever the ordinance there MUST be some penalty associated
with violations. The current hands-off policy by the Burlingame Police for
violations is especially frustrating. In this area PaIo Alto makes
violations a rnisdemeanor punishable by six months in jail or $1000 fine, or
both. Atherton gives a warning, and then increasing fines of $100r$200rand
1500.
I would propose a warning for the first offense, and then significant fines
and preferably action relating to the issuance of the building permit.
Continual violations shouLd lead to the revocation of the building permit,
and perhaps any planning perrnits or variances associated with the project.
Without a real and enforced penalty contractors and owners will corrtinue to
ignore the rules as they do today.
I would ask that this item be addressed in a timely manner. As sunmer is
approaching the level of the syi ct-irlg nuisance for homeowners on Alvarado
and Benito Avenues needs to be arrdressed. I would also note that I believe
that the vast majority of contractors alteady abide by the hours that I am
proposing, and that the impact of these changes would be rninimal for overall
construction.
Sincerely yours,
Randy VandenBrink
1412 Alvarado Avenue
Burlingame, California 94010
Phone Horue (650) 579-0554
celI (650) 678-s280
3
\-
SURVEY OF CONSTRUCTION HOURS
Weekda),
7-7
Saturdav Sunday/Holida),
9-6 10-6Burlingame
Atherton
Belmont
Brisbane
Daly City
East Palo Alto
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Hillsborough
Menlo Park
Millbrae
Pacifica
Portola Valley
San Bruno
San Mateo
South San Francisco
San Carlos
RedwoodCity
Woodside
8-5
8-5
7-7
None None
t0-5 None
9-7 9-7
Construction allowed anytime for non-major projects
(less than a subdivision) unless determined to be a
'onuisance"
Construction allowed anytime for non-major projects
(less than a suMivision' uriless determined to be a
"nuisance"
7:30-8
8-5:30
7-10
7-7
7-6
7-8 Construction allowed anytime if below
lr0db
7:30-5:30 8-l None
Construction allowed
anytime if not deter-
mindtobe"excessive"
7:30-7
7-6
8-5
8-6
7-7
9-8
l0-6
None
9-5
8-6
9-5
10-5
7-10
12-4
10-6
9-5
9-8
8-6
l0-5
9-5
8-6
9-5
9-5:30
7-10
9-5
9-8
9-5
8-8
9-5
\-
San Mateo County
\-.
7-6
ANALYSIS OT' CONSTRUCTION HOI]RS
The City has obtained the construction hours for weekdays, Saturday and Sunday from 19 other
jurisdictions located in San Mateo County as indicated in the attachment. Ofthese jurisdictions, four
(Atherton, Belmont Hillsborough and Woodside) ban consEuction on Sundays; and only Atherton bans
consfruction on Saturdays.
Following is a comparison of Burlingame hours with other jurisdictions:
Weekdays
Starting time in Burlingame: 7 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m to 8 a.m.
' Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive, and l0 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 7:45 a.m.*
Stopping time in Burlingame: 7 p.m.. Set stopping times range from 5 p.m. to l0 p.m.
' Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average stopping time is 6:30 p.m.*
Total number of hours in Burlingame: 12 hours. Total hours range from t hours to 15 hours*
' Nine jurisdictions ure more restrictive, and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average total number of hours is I l.l hours*
Saturday
Starting time in Burlingame: 9 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m. to l0 a.m.
' Three jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 16 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 9 a.m.*
Stoppine time in Burlingame: 6 p.m.
' Set stopping times ftrnge from I p.m. to l0 p.m.
' Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restictive or the same. Average stopping time is 5:45 p.m.*
Total number of hours in Burlingame: t hours. Total hours range from 7 hours to 15 hours*
' Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average total number of hours is t hours*
\-.
Sunday
Starting time in Burlingame: l0 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m. to 12 noon. Five jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 14 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 9:30 a.m.*
Stooping time in Burlingame: 6 p.m.
. Set stopping times range from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m.
. Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same
. Average stopping time is 6 p.m.*
Total number of hours in Burlingame: 8 hours. Total hours r:rnge from 4 hours to 15 hours*. Six jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 13 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same
. Average total number of iir'-rs is 8.8 hours*
Total hours range from 45 hours to 105 hours**
Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same
Average number ofhours is 70 hows***
includes only the jurisdictions with set times
doesnotincludethe fourjurisdictiorswhichallowconstuctionanytime onvariousdays. Ifthese
jurisdictions are include., ' re range is 45 hours to 163 hours
doesnot includethe fourjurisdictionswhichallowconstuctionanytime onvariousdays. Ifthese
jurisdictions are included, the average number ofhours is 83 hours.
Summary of All Days
Weekly total number of hours in Burlinsame: 77 hours
I
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 10,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
5t20to2
6d
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SETTING TIME LIM|TS FOR PARK|NG FREE LOTS F AND H AND
INTRODUCING AN ORDINANCE TO GRANT AUTHORITY TO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO
TOW VEHICLES FROM CITY PARKING LOTS
RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that Council:
' Approve the attached resolution setting a24-hour maximum time limit for parking in lots F and H.
' Introduce an Ordinance to grant authority to the Police Department to tow vehicles stored at or blocking City parking
lots by:
l. Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the attached ordinance.2. Waiving funher reading of the proposed ordinance.
3. lntroducing the proposed ordinance.
4. Directing the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before its
proposed adoption.
BACKGROTIND: In Novemb er 2001 ,Council approved the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area Parking Plan which
included free parking in Lots F and H, parking lot improvements and signage as well as parking rate increases. The
purpose of the free lots is to encourage long term parking in the outlying areas, thus freeing up spaces near the
Burlingame Avenue Core area for short term parkers.
DISCUSSION: Since the implementation of free parking in Lots F and H, it has been observed that the long term
parkers are highly attracted by these lots; and the lots are usually full by 8:00 a.m. on weekdays. The City has reieived
complaints from downtown business employees that some vehicles are left in these lots for extended time periods
causing a limited supply of free parking for employees.
As a result, staff completed a one-week license plate survey of vehicles parked in Lots F and H to determine if there is
an abuse of free parking. The attached survey results show that there is an average of 21 (21.2o/o) vehicles found to be
parked in the same spaces, unmoved, in Lot F and 9 (10.7%) vehicles in Lot H on weekdays.
Although the percentage of vehicles parked in these free lots for an extended time is not significantly high, to prevent
abuse of free parking, staffrequests that Council approve the attached resolution to limitparking to a 24-hourmaximum
time period. Approval of this resolution will grant the Police Department the authority io tickel the vehicles which are
parked beyond the prescribed time limit. The proposed ordinance will give the Police Department the same authority
to tow vehicles from City parking lots that the Department has on public streets that are parked longer than 72
consecutive hours as well as to tow vehicles from lots that are obstructing the traffic lanes or where- parking is
prohibited.
Staff will be performing a study of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area in the fall of 2OO2to assess the impact
of the parking rate increase, free parking in Lots F and H, and its affect on parking supply and demand. Staff will bring
the results of the study to the Council along with any recommended modifications to the Burlingame Avenue
Commercial Area Parking Plan.
EXHIBITS : Resolution; Ordinance; Survey Results
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
c: City Clerk, Police Department Dept., Rita Chafee, John Pivirotto
C:\Docunrents and Settings\andersonVlcal Settings\Tenpomry Intemet Files\OLKlB\Free Lots Time Limit and ordinance.wpd
'r'
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
l7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE No.
ORDINAIICE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING THE TOWING OF VEHICLES FROM CITY PARKING LOTS
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. The City of Burlingame has purchased and improved a number of parking lots
to serve the community, and these parking lots must be available for use as parking facilities and
not for the storage of vehicles or to avoid airport and other transit parking facilities. This ordinance
will ensure that law enforcement has the authority to remove vehicles that are interfering with the
use of those parking or that are being stored at the lots.
Section 2. A new section 13.04.125 is added as follows:
13.04.125 Parking lots or facilities, city, municipal, or public.
"City parking lot," "city parking facility," "municipal parking lot," "municipal parking
facility," ' public parking lot," or "public parking facility'' means an off-street area or structure that
is owned, leased by, operated by, or operated on behalf of the city for the purpose of parking by the
general public, with or without compensation. A parking lot or parking facility in the city that is
controlled by a public agency other than the city shall be treated as a private off-street parking
facility under this title.
Section 3. Section 13.08.090 is amended to read as follows:
13.08.090 When vehicles maybe removed from streets and public parking lots or iacilities.
Any police officer may remove or cause to be removed:
(a) Any vehicle that has been parked or left standing upon a street, ot highway, or ptrblic
parking lot or t-acility for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours;
(b) Anyvehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street, or highway, or public parking
lot or lacility when such parking or standing is prohibited by ordinance or resolution of this city
or upon any designated fire lane and signs are posted giving notice of such removal. Signs upon
fire lanes on private property shall be prepared and posted at the owner's expense;
1t!1912001
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
16
17
18
t9
20
2l
22
Z)
24
25
26
27
28
(c) Any vehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street,or highway, or public parking
lot or facility where the use of such street, or highway, or public parking lot or facil ity or a portion
thereof is necessary for cleaning, repair or construction ofthe streetpr highway, or public parking
lot or tbcility, or for the installation of underground utilities or where the use of the street or
highway or anyportion thereof is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic,
or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of
equipment, articles or structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicles would prohibit
or interfere with such use or movement, provided that signs giving notice that such vehicle may
be removed are erected or placed at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the removal.
Section 4. Section 13.36.049 is amended to read as follows
13-36.049 Moving vehicles in public parking lots or facilities and use of public parking lots
or facilities for storage of vehicles.
(a) It is unlawful for anyperson to move a vehicle within a municipal parking lot so that
it remains therein for a period of time in violation of Section 13.36.050. Any vehicle observed at
two or more parking spaces in the parking facility within such a period of time and having an
observed odometer change of less than one-tenth miles shall be presumed to have remained within
such lot; a vehicle observed at two or more parking spaces in the parking facility within such a
period of time and with the odometer obscured from view from without the vehicle shall be
rebuttably presumed to have remained stationary.
(b) It is unlawful for any person who owns or has possession, custody, or control of any
vehicle, to park or leave such vehicle upon any mimicipal parking lot for a period of sevent.v-trvo
(72) consecutive hours or more. For purposes of this subsection, a vehicle shall be considered to
have been parked or left stancling for seventy{ivo (72) or more cotxecutive hours if it iras not been
moved at least one-tenth of a mile during the seventy-two (72) hour period. A vehicle rvith the
odometer obscured from view trorn without the vehicle shall be rebuttably presumed to have
remained stationary.
.)rU19t200l
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
13
l4
15
16
17
18
t9
20
27
22
Z)
24
25
26
27
28
Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the day of
-,2002,
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COI,NCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COI-INCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C : \FILES\ORDINANC\parkinglottowing.pwd.wpd
31111912001
The City of Burlingame
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TEL:(650) 558-7230
CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O-3997
LICENSE PLATE S ON PARKING LOT F & H
DATE & TIME
LOT F
TOTAL
SPACES
98
PERCENTAGE OF
VEHICLES
PARKED
EXTENDED
PERIOD OF TIME
LOT H
TOTAL
SPACES
86
PERCENTAGE OF'
VEHICLES
PARKED
EXTENDED
PERIOD OT'TIME
r-29-02 TO l-30-02
6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM
2l 2r.42%8 9.3%
r-29-02 TO l-30-02
6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM
22 22.45%9 r0.46%
t-29-02 TO l-30-02
6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM
22 22.45%9 10.46%
r-29-02 TO l-30-02
6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM
t7 17.34%8 9.3%
r-29-02 TO l-30-02
6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM
22 22.45%12 13.95%
AVERAGE 2t 2t.22%9 t0.69%
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 5t20t2002
6c
STAFF REPORT
TO:Honorable Mavor and Council SUBMITTED
BY
DATE:Mav 13.2002
BY
FROM: Larry E. Andersou,elbr
CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF ORDINAIICE AMENDING THE MASSAGE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW THE RELEASE OF THE SURETY BOND FOLLOWING 24
CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF LAWFUL OPERATION UNDER THE PERMIT
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider introduction of ordinance reducing the surety bond requirements for massage practitioners following
24 consecutive months of lawful operation, and if acceptable to the Council, introduce ordinance by
A. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
B. Waive further reading of the ordinance.
C. Introduce the proposed ordinance.
D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 5 days before proposed
adoption.
DISCUSSION:
At the }day 20 Council meeting, the Council heard from a massage practitioner who had concems that the
current Code requirements (Chapter 6.40) put a difficult financial burden on massage practitioners by requiring
the posting of a permit bond, regardless of the nature of the practice.
Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would reduce this requirement by allowing the bond to be
released following a period of successful operation in the City. The proposed ordinance would provide that
following 24 months of operation without suspension or filing of a complaint against the business by the district
attomey, city attorney, Attorney General, or U.S. attorney, the bond would be released upon request of the
permitholder.
There are other possible approaches
1) Allow the Chief of Police to waive the requirement for a surety bond for limited period of time under
limited circumstances, such as: a) documented inability to afford the bond; and b) demonstrated ability and
experience to meet the requirements of the regulations. This could include a required deposit in lieu of the bond
for an amount determined from the financial statement.
Mayor and Council
Re: Consider lntroduction of Ordinance Regarding Posting of Permit Bond by Massage Practitioners
May 13,2002
Page2
2) Reduce the amount of bond required by the ordinance. This may have a very small benefit, because
the base price of the bond, no matter the amount, is often the largest charge.
As discussed at the previous meeting, the bond requirement provides a number of important protections to the
community:
1) An applicant who is able to obtain a bond has demonstrated a commitment to the profession, an
ability to satisfy the financial requirements of surety company, and a willingness to stand behind the business;
2) The community has assurance that there is a fund available in case of malpractice or misfeasance; and
3) The City's taxpayers have recourse to a fund for enforcement actions.
The tough regulations adopted by the City in 1993 have served the City well. Staff urges that any changes be
made with great care.
Attachment
Proposed ordinance
Distribution
Chief of Police
Elizabeth Graham
Gina La Rocca
1
2
-)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING SECTION 6.40.115
TO ALLOW THE RELEASE OF A SURETY BOND FOR A MASSAGE
PERMITHOLDER AFTER TWENTY.FOUR MONTHS OF LAWFUL OPERATION
UNDER THE PERMIT
The CITY COLINCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section l. In 1993, the City adopted a comprehensive ordinance to regulate massage
practitioners in the City because many massage operations had been seized by organized crime
and were fronts for thievery and prostitution. The ordinance has been very successful, although
criminal elements continue to seek ways around the ordinance as reflected in other
communities' current problems in Santa Clara County.
However, the ordinance does place restrictions on the legitimate practice ofmassage as
well. A massage practitioner has requested the City Council to consider reducing the impact
on legitimate operators by limiting the requirement for a surety bond. This ordinance is in
response to that request and is based on a permitholder's conformance to State and local laws
while operating a massage business in the City over a demonstrated period of time. This
reduction is subject to change by ordinance amendment at any time if this reduction is used by
criminal elements to bring illicit massage operations back to the City.
Section 2. Section 6.40.115 is amended to read as follows:
6.40.115 Surety bond.
(a) Every applicant for an operator's permit shall post with the city clerk, a surety in the
principal sum amount of ten thousand either in cash or executed as surety by a good and
sufficient corporate surety authorized to do a surety business in the state of California and as
principal by the applicant. The form of the bond shall have been approved by the city attorney
and shall provide that should the applicant be issued a permit under this chapter which is
subsequently suspended or revoked, the city shall be reimbursed from said bond for all costs of
said any investigation or other proceedings related to said suspension or revocation.
1
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
l4
15
I6
t7
18
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) If a holder of a pennit under this chapter successfully cornpletes twenty-four (24),
consecutive months in actnal operation under the permit withottt any suspension of the pemrit
or the filing of any criminal or civil complaint regarding operations under the permit by eitlrer
a city attorney, a district attorney, the California Attorney General, or a United States Attorney,
the permitliolder rnay request the city to release the surety bond, rvhich the city shall do upon
verification that no such suspension or complaint filing lras occurred during the period.
Holvever, if at any time following such a release of the surety bond, the city determines that the
permitholder is corrducting its operations in violation of this chapter, the chief of police may
order the posting of a surety bond in accortlance with subsection (a) abot e as a condition of
continued operations under the permit.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
-day
of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the day of--,2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
SETTING TIME LIMITS FOR PARKING LOTS F AND H
RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME, California, that:
WHEREAS, Municipal Code title 13 provides the framework for regulating the City's
parking lots; and
WHEREAS, this Council has from time to time established regulations for time limitations
and charges for various City parking lots, most recently in Resolution No. I 3 1 -2001 ; and
WHEREAS, offering free parking in certain lots has encouraged employees ofbusinesses
to use that parking and leave closer-in parking for greater tumover use by customers; and
WHEREAS, it has also allowed persons to park vehicles in the lots with free parking for
overly extended periods of time; and
WHEREAS, a reasonable time limitation will accommodate both employees and nearby
residents while preventing storage of vehicles or longer term parking,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED and DETERMINED as
follows:
1. No person shall park any vehicle on City parking lot F or H for longer than a period
of twenty-four (24) hours.
2. These time limitations shall supersede any and all such limitations and hours adopted
by prior resolutions of this Council.
3. The Director ofPublic Works is hereby authorized and directed to procure and install
appropriate signs giving notice of the provisions of this resolution.
15/1012002
af,r
4. Thetime limitations setforthinthis resolutionshall beoperativeupontheinstallation
ofsuch signs.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifl, that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_ day of 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COIINCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
z5/10/2002
-a
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: May9,20A2
FRoM: Randy Schwartz (650) 558-7307
Director of Parks & Recreation
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE s/20102
7a
BY
BY
d
suBJEcr: Washington Park Ballfield Renovation - City Project # 80190
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting as complete the
work done by Scapes Landscape, Inc. at the Washington Park Ballfield.
BACKGROUND:
The Washington Park Ballfield Renovation project was completed on May 3, 2002 inaccordance
with the plans and specifications approved by Council for this project and to the satisfaction of
the Dept. staffand our project architect.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution accepting completion of the Washington Park Ballfield Renovation project.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Original contract amount:
Change orders (drainage issues)
$l18,750
0
Total contract amount:$118,750
106.875
$11,875
Amount paid to date:
Final payment:
Final payment of the contract will be paid upon approval of this resolution. Sufficient funds are
available to complete this project.
--f i -'
NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING COMPLETION OF
WASHINGTON PARK BALLFIELD RENOVATION
CITY PROJECT NO. 80190
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, Califomia, and this Council
does herebyFlND, ORDER and DETERMINE as follows:
l. The Parks & Recreation Director of said City has certified that the work done by SCAPES.
/NC underthetermsofitscontractwiththeCityofBurlingamedatedOctoberlT,200l.has
been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by this Council
therefor and to the satisfaction of the Parks & Recreation Director.
2. Said work is particularly described as #80190 WASHINGTON PARK BALLFIELD
RENOVATION.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
4. The city engineer is directed to execute and file for record with the County Recorder notice
of the completion thereof as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2ff dav of Mav 2002.
and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 9, 2OO2
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
5t20t02
7b
TO:
DATE:
FROM
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTTON AWARDTNG A CONSTRUCTTON CONTRACT TO TR|N CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE
CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION , cP 80510
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding the
construction contract to Trinet Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,031,610 for the California/Grove Area
Storm Drain Pump Station.
BACKGROUND: Six bids for the project were opened on May l, 2002, ranging from $1,143,660 to
$1,389,366. The bid of Trinet Construction, Inc. was recalculated from $1,166,610 to $1,031,6L0 due to an
arithmetical error involving the total amount for clearing and grubbing work. As a result, Trinet Construction,
Inc. is the low bidder with a price of $1,031,610 which is 12% above the engineer's estimate.
Trinet Construction, Inc. has met all the requirements for the project and has a past history of satisfactory work
for the City and other public agencies. The project consists of 350 feet of storm drain pipe, storm drain inlets,
manhole structures, new pumps and a standby generator. The project will increase the capacity of the storm
drain system in the California/Grove area to 30 years and thereby alleviate chronic flooding problems in the
area. The project construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in June 2002 and be completed by December
2002, weather permitting.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Bid Summary; Location Map; Agreement
BUDGET IMPACT: The estimated construction phase costs are as follows
Construction
Contingency (15%)
Construction Phase Professional Services
Total Estimated Construction Phase Cost
$1,031,610
$ 155,000
$17s.000
$1,361,610
There are adequate funds in the CIP Budget to complete the project.
Douglas Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, Finance Director
Trinet Construction, Inc.
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\805 10 AwardTrinet May2002.wpd
CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION
TRINET CONSTRUCTION. INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 80510
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the
CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 80510; and
WHEREAS, on May l, 2002, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk and
representatives of the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., submitted the lowest responsible bid for thejob in the amount of $1,031,610.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, thar the plans and
Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., for said
project in the amount of $1,031,610; and the same hereby is accepted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful
bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and thatth9Cily Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute
said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor and materiali bond required
to be furnished by the contractor.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
S:\A Public Work Directory\PROIECTS\805lo\ResolutrAward.wpd
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
BID RESULT TABULATION SPREADSHEET, MAy 1, 2002, 2:00 pM
Cellfomle Grcve tltonn Dnln Pump Strtlon
Clty of Burllngamc Pn4.ct No. 80510
Trln.t Connmlon lnc.
Condr. lnc.
Stom Engi Contnctor lnc.NCCI, lnc.
Itam
No.
Eatim{aa Unit
Pdca
Unil
Pric.
TMI
Ahouil
Unlt TOht
Amount
Unlt
Prlca
Totrl Unh TOIt unal
Pric.
TOEI
Amount
3 dbposel t00 LF 3 5m 3 lno m s 50.00 I 5000m t 1E.00 t 1.800.00 3 aom 3 loonm 3 10.00 s 1.000.00 3 10.00 s 't.000.00
1 Fumkh a lnstell Slom Ddln Plm . 12' dl,F $85.00 s 5 720 00 s 100.00 s 8.800.00 s 280 00 3 3 120.00 s 10 560 00 3 100 00 3 A AOO OO llo oo t) 7ro on
8 Fumbh a lnst.ll Stom Doin Pie. 18'di..11 F 3 E0.(x)s 3.280 00 s 235 00 t s,635.00 3 270.00 3 11 070 00 3 25A nO t 10.378.00 3 300 00 s t2 3m 00 3 r80 00 s 6S000
I 51 LF s 12S m I 8.375.00 s 300.00 t 15 300 00 $ 2E0.00 3 14.280.00 s 247 ffi s 1a 837 00 $325.00 3 16.575.00 3 180.00 s e 180.00
10 Fumbh t lnstril Slom Dmh Plil. 30'di.F t 150.m 3 21 750 00 i 230.00 s 33.350.00 3 2eo oo 3 D O50 0a t 230.00 3 33.350.00 s 260 00 t 36 250 0n ,io 06 30 lqo ao
Fumkh a hstafl Stom OEln Plo€ . 48' dia.1A LF s 2Sm I amm s 6amoo t 600.00 3 0.600 m 3 t 375.00 3 6.000.00 I 220.00 t 3.520.00
3
Entire Pump Statlon Earlhwort, Compl€t&ln
da@, Fin.l Pay (State Smc 0.,l,015),300 CY 3 30m t 95.00 3 125mm 3 Bl oo I 6.t.500.00 t 110 Sm OO t llq oo I 50.00 3 65.000.00
t5
MCC/StoreOe Buildln! Found.tion & Rool
Completlln-PlE@ 51 CY s 4mm s 20 {oo oo 3 750.00 38.250 00 s 700 m t 35.700.00 s 905.00 t ta 155 00 s I OOO 06 s 5r ooo oo 7no no 15 700 m
16
Mcc/Slorage Buildlm Blsk walls, Doo6,
Veils, .m Paiil, ComdotltFPt @
2'Welar S6d lnsienellon & Metedrls
$,t8,000.00 3 46.000 m 3 * ooo oo $ 36.000.00 t 35.000.00 s 33 000 00 s tlomooo I 110.000.00 3 40.000.00 3 a0 000 00 t 73 000 m 3 ?5 000 00
1A
Emergoncl conrrator Fouhddion, Compl6t6
ln.Ph6 15 CY s 1m oo 3 ,r.500.m s 500 00 3 7 500 00 s 350.00 s 525000 3 450 m I q 7to oo t 525.00 $7.075.00 3 700.00 t 10.500.00
?o
rump staton tsbdnqt & oodrcb,
CmpbtliFPls6 1 LS s lilmm 3 194,000.00 3 170.000 00 t 170000m t 217.500.00 I 217.500.00 s 172 000 m 3 172 0m m 3 rt5 mo no t 155,000.00 t 250.000.00 $250.000.00
21 1 LS 3 85.000 00 3 85 mO OO I 50.000.00 t 50.000.00 $78 m0 00 s 7A OOO OO I 42.000.00 s {2.000 00 3 50mm 3 50 000 m s 70 000 m s 70 mo o0
))1 EA s 25mOm I 100,000.00 5 38 7S0 00 s 155 000 00 t s7.000.00 5 228.000.00 s 35 000 m s lao ooo oo s 1E0,000.00 3 75.000.00 $300.000.00
27 1 LS 3 15.0m.00 t l5mOm 3 1 500m t 1.500.00 s a 300 00 s a 300 00 t 1,E00.00 3 1.t00.00 3 5000m 3 5 000 00 s 30moo s 3000m
21
FO@ MAaO Pipam am valws, complet+iF
Pla@ 1 s s a5 000 00 3 45.000.00 s 4a o00 00 s 46 000 00 t 13.000.00 t 13.000.00 3 57 000 m 3 57 ono oo s 70,@0.00 5 70.000.00 3 20.000.00 s 20.000.00
25 Pum Sletl66 AC Pr$nd Comd.r.-idplr^,81 Tons t 85 00 s a 485 00 t 200.00 s 16 200 00 s 300 00 t 24.300.00 t 74.00 t 5 991 00 I l20m 3 0 720 00 3 ao oo a aao oo
28 Complete-in-Plac6 2AO CY $30.00 3 8.400.00 3 30 00 t 8,400.00 $85.00 3 23 800 00 s 20 00 t 6,120.00 s 55.00 3 15.a00.00 3 40.00 $1 L200.00
2E
wod Em06 & Foundstion, complete-in-
Pla@ s 3 lo 000 00 s 10.000.00 s I {00 00 3 6.400.00 $ 6.500.00 s 850000 s 25 000 00 s 25,000.00 3 14.000.00 $1,a.000.00 $ 30.000.00 $ 30.000.00
29 1 LS s 25m0m 3 ?5 000 00 t 't5.500.00 $15 500 00 3 1000000 $ 10,000.00 3 23.000.00 s 23 000 00 3 16 000 00 s !6 000 00 ,o noo oo 20 000 m
30
Sscked Concrcte Slope Protedion,
Comoldo.in-Plee t 20.000.00 3 20 m0 00 3 a ooo oo $ E.000.00 3 I 500 00 s 9 500 00 $ il.000.00 3 1't.000.00 s 25 000 00 I 25 000 00 s 30 m0 00 s 30 000 00
TOTAL BIO mMS ilot. I tftoogh tl:I r,o3l,at0.00 I l,l,.t,3a0.0o I t,'t6?,t30.00 I t,l67,liL,00 t t,3r!,t20.00 t r,ltt,366.0o
NoL3:
t. Coruded orcntlon vrluo, BId
2. Comctod o)donslon rluc, 8ld
[rm #1, Tdoct CoNtr. lnc.
llm;i10, llccl, lnc.
CALIF STORMWATER PUMP STATION
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CITY PROJEGT NO. 80510
f/\:--*:lV
PNOJECTSITE
+
iprPi;$
;i
+.+"lo
!..-f !
VICIMTYMAP
ffioM
NUmffi.(]rro
\
ri$
PROJECT SITE
.},
AGREEMENT FOR PIJBLIC IMPROVEMENT
CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION
CITY PROJECT NO. 80510
THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame,
CountyofSanMateo,StateofCaliforniaon-,2002,byandbetweenthe
CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and TRINET
CONSTRUCTION, INC., hereinafter called "Contractor,"
WITNESSETH:
WIIERBAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the
public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract;
and
WIIEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly pubtished
for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and
WIIERBAS, on MAY 20,2002, after notice duly given, the City Council of
Burlingame awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter
described to Contractor, which the Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for these
improvements; and
WIIEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the
construction of said improvements,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parries hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work.
Contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled:
CALIFORNIA/ GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION, CITY JOB NO. 80510.
AGREEMENT - 1
2. The Contract Documents.
The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement, Notice
Inviting Sealed Bids, the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this
project by State law, the accepted Bid Proposal, the complete plans, profiles, detailed
drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter
referred to as the Contract Documents. A11 rights and obligations of City and Contractor are
fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described
documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in
the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents.
3. Contract Price.
The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in fuIl, payment of the work above
agreed to be done, the sum of ONE MILLION, THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND, SIX
HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 dollars ($1,031,610.00). This price is determined by the unit
prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials
furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications, such work
and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in
progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents.
4. Provisions Cumulative.
The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in
limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City.
5. Notices.
A11 notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail,
postage prepaid.
AGREEMENT - 2
Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows:
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows:
TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
2560 Marin Street
San Francisco, CA 94t24
6. Interpretation.
As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the
plural and vice versa.
7. Waiver or Amendment.
No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this
Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the
Contractor.
IN WITNESS WIDREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting
of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be
deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove
named on the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF BURLINGAME,
a Municipal Corporation
Bv
''CONTRACTOR''
Approved as to form:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City Auorney
AGREEMENT - 3
Rv
AGREEMENT f,'OR PUBLIC IMPROYEMENT
CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION
CMY PROJECT NO. 80510
TIIIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame,
County of San Mateo, State of California on_,2ffi2,by and between the
CITY OF BIJRLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and TRINET
CONSTRUCTION, INC., hereinafter called "Contractor, "
WITNESSETII:
WfffnnlS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the
public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract;
and
WIIEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly published
for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and
WIUREAS, on MAY 20, 2002, after norice duly given, the City Council of
Burlingame awarded the coftract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter
described to Contractor, which the Council found to be tle lowest responsible bidder for these
improvements; and
WIIEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the
construction of said improvements,
NOW, TIIEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties herero as follows:
1. Scooe of work
contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled:
CALIFORMA/ GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PT]MP STATION, CITY JOB NO. 80510.
AGREEMENT.l
2. The Contract Documents.
The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement, Notice
Inviting Sealed Bids, the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this
project by State law, the accepted Bid Proposal, the complete plans, profiles, detailed
drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter
referred to as the Contract Documents. All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are
fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described
documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in
the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents.
3. Contract Price.
The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above
agreed to be done, the sum of ONE MILLION, THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND, SIX
HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 dollars ($1,031,610.00). This price is determined by the unit
prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials
furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications, such work
and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in
progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents.
4. Provisions Cumulative.
The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in
limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City.
5. Notices.
All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail,
postage prepaid.
AGREEMENT - 2
Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows:
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF BI'RLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as fo[[ows:
TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC.
2560 Marin Sreet
San Francisco, CA 9417+
6. Interpretation.
As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the
plural and vice versa
7. Waiver or Amendment.
No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this
Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the
Contractor
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting
of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be
deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove
named on the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF BT'RLINGAME,
a Municipal Corporation
Bv
CONTRACTOR
By
Approved as to form:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City Attorney
AGREEMENT - 3
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
May 9, 2OO2 BY
APPROVED
PUBL!C WORKS
sUBJECT: RESOLUTTON ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR BROADWA
1 190 TO 1454 BROADWAY, TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
5t20lo2
7c
TO:
DATE:
FROM BY
REETSCAPE, NORTH SIDE
CITY PROJECT NO. 9511
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting
$874,305.11 in improvements for the North Broadway Streetscape project by J.J.R. Construction.
BACKGROLII\D: On June 18, 2001, Council authorized a $849,244 contract with J.J.R. Construction for
streetscape improvements along the north side of Broadway. All construction has been completed including
repair work in the 1100 block. Additional expenditures amounting to $25,061 or 3% of the contract included:
o Unforeseen utility repairso Modified catch basins to meet field conditions. Additional water line repair worko Incentive award for early completion
The project has been completed satisfactorily and in a timely manner.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Final Quantities
BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in Account No.320-95110 for this contract. All extra work
was within the administrative 15% contingency authorization.
Gomery
c City Clerk
J.J.R. Construction - Carlos Raposo
Cambridge CM - JT Matarangas
U:\FILES\Staff Reports and council presentations\NORTH Broadway Streetscape Final Acceptance.SR.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR BROADWAY STREETSCAPE
NORTH SIDE 1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY
TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 9511
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by J.J.R.
CONSTRUCTION under the terms of its contract with the City dated JUNE 18, 2001, has been com-
pleted in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 9511.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiry that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2N2, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\PROIECTS\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd
City Clerk
,{,
CONTRACTOR: JJR CONSTRUCTION
.ADDRESS:1l2ONINTHAVENUE, SANMATEO. CA 94402
TELEPHONE ( 650 ) 3436109
BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - NORTH SIDE
1190.1454 BROADWAY
CITY OF BURLINGAME
FINAL PAYMENT
ctTY PROJECT NO. 320-7 51 10-220
PAGE 1 OF 2
DATE: May2,2002
FINAL PAYMENT
PURCHASE ORDER
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT
PRICE
UNIT
SIZE
BID
QUANTITY
BID
TOTAL
QTY THI9
PERIOD
QTY
TO DATE
%AGE
TO DATE
AMOUNT
TO DATE
PREVIOUS
PAID
AMOUNT
THIS PERIOD
1 $30,000.00 L.S,1 $30,000.00 0 1.00 10Oo/o $30.000.00 $30.000.00 $0.00
2 L.S.1 $8,000.00 0 1.00 100o/o $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $0.00
3 1 $20.000.00 0 '1.00 100%$20.000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00
4 $27.000.00 0 1.00 1 00,s27.OOO.OO $27,000.00 $0.00
5 $5 000.00 1 $5.000.00 0 1.00 100 $5.000.00 $5.000.00 $0.00
6 i10.00 L.F 822 $8.220.00 0 822.OO 100o/o $8.220.00 $8.220.00 $0.00
'7 S. F.7,114 $35,570.00 0 7114.OO lOOo/o $35,570.00 $35.570.00 $0.00
I EACH 27 $2,700.00 0 27.OO 100o/o $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $0.00
9 i4.00 5.300 $21,200.00 0 5300.00 '1000/o $21,200.00 $21,200.00 $0.00
10 r.00 10 $6.000.00 0 10.00 100 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00
11 500.00 t.s.$3.500.00 0 1.00 100 $3.500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00
72 L.S.1 $7,700.00 0 1.00 1'aoa $7.700.00 $7.700.00 $0.00
13 $4 500.00 L.S.1 $4,500.00 0 1.00 100r $4.500.00 $4.500.00 $0.00
L4 L. S,1 $2,000.00 0 1.00 100o/o $2,000.00 $2.000.00 $0.00
15 200.00 EACH I $1,800.00 0 9.00 lOOo/o $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $0.o0
16 $4.i00.00 L-S.1 $4,500.00 0 1.00 100o/o $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $0.00
7',7 $2,t00.00 $42.000.00 o '15.00 100%$42,000.00 $42,000.00 $0.00
18 $1,500.00 EACH 3 $4.500.00 o 3.00 100 $4,500.00 s4.500.00 $0.00
19 L.F 325 $14,625.00 325.00 100%$14.625.00 $14.625.00 $0.00
20 L.F,8 $1,600.00 0 8.00 '100($'1.600.00 $ 1,600.00 $0.00
21 L. F,l9 $13,350.00 0 89.00 '100%$13,350.00 $13.350.@ $0.00
22 i55.00 L. F.48 $2,640.00 0 48.00 100%$2,e0.00 $2,640_00 $0.00
23 r.900.00 a $'r 1,700.00 0 2.OO 67%$7,800.00 $7,800.00 $0.00
24 $1,t )00.00 1 $41.000.00 0 50.00 1220/.$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00
25 EACH 6 $4.200.00 0 4.00 67%$2.800.0o s2.800.00 $0.00
25 EACH $4,000.0i 0 4.00 lOOo/o $4.000.00 $4.000.00 s0.00
2'7 i35.00 L.F 862 $30,1 70.00 0 736.00 85($25.760.00 $25.760.00 $0.00
28 $30.00 L. F,132 $3,960.00 0 'r30.00 98or $3,900.00 $3.900.00 $0.00
29 EACH 16 $3,200.00 0 18.00 113%$3,600.00 $3.600.00 $0.00
30 i8.50 s. F.
S,F.
457 0 764.00 $6,494.00
$74,400.75
$0.00
$0.00
32 i50.00 L,F 0 150.00
---_____:::!:
6404 s7.500.00 $7,500.00 $0.00
33 i4.35 S.F $17.391 .3(0 3998.00 100o/o $17.391.30 $'17.391.30 $0.00
34 i2.50 S.F $1 0.665.00 0 6596.00 155%$16.490.00 $16,490.00 $0.00
35 s.F.4 $12,371.40 0 6596.00 1 55'$19,1 28.40 $19.128.40 $0.00
36 $150.00 c.Y.50 $7,s00.00 0 0.00 o%$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
37 EACH 15 $3,000.00 0 't5.00 100%$3,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00
38 L, S.1 s3,500.00 o 1.00 10004 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00
39 1.00 L. F.5.520 $5,s20.00 0 3174.OO 58%$3,174.00 $3,1 74.00 $0.00
40 ).00 1 $200.00 0 4.00 4000/"$800.00 $800.00 $0.00
SITE ELECTRICAL 0 s0.00 $0.00 $0.00
47 Site Electrical ;98,000.00 L.S.1 $98,000.00 0 1.00 lOOo/o $98.000.00 $98.000.00 $0.00
42 Planter Pots $1,000.00 EACH 14 $14,000.00 0 14.00 1O0o/o $14.000.00 $14.000.00 $0.00
43 Relocate Existino Trash Receotacles EACH 4 $1,000.00 0 6.00 1500h $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00
44 Trash Receptacles - New i1.850.00 4 $7,400.00 0 4.OO 100o/o $7,400.00 $7.400.00 $0.00
45 Bikes Racks 5 $2.500.00 0 5.00 lOOo/o $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $0.00
46 Precast Concrete Seat Walls ;1 1,500.00 EACH ($69.000.00 0 6.00 10004 $69.000.00 $69,000.00 $0.00
florthBrdwypaymentschedule_s 51312002 4:59 PM
rl
l.r
CONTRACTOR: JJR CONSTRUCTION
ADDRESS:
1190 NINTHAVENUE, SAN MAIEO. CA 9,1402
TELEPHONE (650 )343$109
BROADWAY STREETSCAPE Ii'PROVEMENTS - NORTH SIDE
1190-'t454 BROADWAY
CITY OF BURLINGAME
FINAL PAYMENT
crw PRoJECT NO. 320-7 s'.t 10-220
PAGE 2 OF 2
DATE: May2,2oo2
FINAL PAYMENT
PURCHASE ORDER
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT
PRICE
UNIT
srzE
BID
OUANTITY
BID
TOTAL
QTY THIS
PERIOD
QUANTITY
TO DATE
% AGE AMOUNT
TO DATE
PREVIOUS
PAID
AMOUNT
THIS PERIOO
IIRRIGATION AND LANDSCAP
47 lnigation System $30,1 40.00 L.S.1 $30,1 40.00 0 1.00 1O0o/o $30.140.00 $30.1 40.00 $0.00
48 Backfill Placements (Final Pay ltem)$46.50 c.Y.210 $9,76s.00 0 104.00 50%s4.836.00 $4.836.00 $0.00
49 Trees, 36" Box $1,265.00 EACH 23 $29,095.00 0 23.00 1 00%$29,095.00 $29,095.00 $0.00
50 Shrubs, 5 Gallon $30.00 EACH 381 $11 ,430.00 0 381 O0 100%$1'1,430.00 $11,430.00 $0.00
51 Shrubs. 1 Gallon (Allowance)s10.50 EACH 1,262 $13,251 .00 0 1234.00 98Yo $12,957.00 $12,957.00 $0.00
52 Plants, 4" Pots $3.50 168 $588.00 0 0.00 0%$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Bark Mulch $0.5(S.F.1.061 $530.50 0 106t.00 lOOo/o 3530.50 $530.50 s0.00
54 Root Barner (Biobarrier)$13.50 L.F 446 $6.021.00 0 492.00 1 lOo/o s6.642.00 $6.642.00 s0.00
55 )lant Establishment Period $2,000.00 L.S.1 $2,000.00 0 1.00 100%s2.000.00 $2.000.00 $0.00
56 Metal Planting Banier $1 10.00 L.F 43 $4,730.00 0 39.00 91%s4.290.00 $,r.290.00 $0.00
57 Relocate Water Meters and Valves $250.00 EACH 14.00 $3,500.00 0 '15.00 107%$3.750.00 $3,750.00 $0.00
58 Relocate Sanitary Sewer Cleanouts $250.00 13.00 s3.250.00 0 5.00 38o/o $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $0.00
ITEM DESCRIPTION
REPATR ITEM _ 11OO
uNlr
PRICE
UNIT
stzE
BID
QUANTITY
BID
rOTAL
QTY THIS
PERIOD
QTY
TO DATE
%AGE
rO DATE
AMOUNT
TO DATE
PREVIOUS
PAID
AMOUNT
rHIS PERIODA I lRemoveand replace concrete sideu,al i -1 1 51 Broadwav $20.00 S.F.12 s240.00 0 118/9867o/o $23,880.00 $23,680.0O $0.00
over 1" wide no
$50,00 L.F.512 $25.600.00 0 0 o%$0.00 s0.oo $0.00
$10.s0 70 $735.00 0 173 247%s1.816.50 s1.816.50 $0.00
$33.00 EACH 2 $66.0(0 7 350%s231.00 $23'1.00 $0.00
$28.00 EACH 1 $28.00 0 5 300%$84.00 $84.00 $0.00
$350.00 EACH 3 $ t,050.00 0 6 2000h $2.'100.00 $2,100.00 $0.00
s275.00 L.S.1 $275,00 0 ,l 100%$275.00 $275.00 $0.00{ I lReplace Utility Box Lid with Fiberlvte lit $1.500.00 1 s1,500.00 o 0 Oo/o $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
00
CONTRACTORS CHANGE ORDERS
I-T,IJ.*I $9,1 03.00 L.S.1 $9,1 03.00 0 1 '100.00%$9, '103.00 $9.1 03.00 $0.00
c.c.o.#2:$11,55't.66 L.S.1 $'11 ,551.66 0 1 100.00%$11,55'1.66 $'11,55'1.66
c.c.o. #3:L.S.$0.00 0.00%$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
i20.654.66 i0.00
TOTAL CONTRACT
PREPARED
CHECKED
APPROVED
crw
t849,243.95
SUBTOTAL
INCENTIVE (ADDITIVE)
TEN PERCENT RETENTION
SUBTOTAL WITH ADDITIONS
8i!3,650 . a5 8{3,650. {5 O. O0
W
s/t/",
st/s/a>;tr-7-
$864,305.1 1
$10,000.00
$0.00
$864,305.1 1
$0.00
: ($86,430.51)
: $777,474.60
$0.00
$10,000.00 |
VP $874,305.1 I
$86,430.51
$s6t3o5 I
I
I
-----q99Jgq,!r-lTOTAL THIS PERIOD $874,305.1 1 _$711,877.60_
NorthBrdwypaymenbchedule_s 51312002 4:59 PM
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
5t20to2
7d
ro: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE; May7,2OO2
APPROVED
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDlNG SOUTH BROADWAY STREETSC IMPROVEMENTS,
1 190 fO 1454 BROADWAY, TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION and RESOLUTION
APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO BROADWAY STREETSCAPE BUDGET CITY
PROJECT NO. 951 1
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the following resolutions for the
Broadway Streetscape Improvements, along the south side from 1199 to 1445 Broadway:. resolution awarding a construction contract to J.J.R. Construction in the amount of
$1,406,450.90 for all work including modified alley treatments.. resolution approving transfer of $147,000 from general fund reserve to Broadway Streetscape
Improvements budget.
BACKGROUND: In November, 2001 Council directed staff to proceed with the next phase of the
Broadway streetscape improvements along the south side of Broadway, generally between Laguna Avenue
and El Camino Real. The master plan construction extends from 1199 Broadway (the old Galleria de Farsh
site) to 1445 Broadway (Bay View Bank) and will include three mid block alley treatments.
DISCUSSION:
Construction contract award to J.J.R. Construction On April 18, 2002, bids were opened for the
Broadway Streetscape Improvements project. Two bids were received of $ 1,447 ,168 and $ 1,406,451 .
J.J.R. Construction was the lowest responsible bidder. The bid price is about the same as the
engineer's estimate of $1,432,045. The bid includes the mid block alley treatments for all three
blocks. In an effort to reduce project expenditures, the Broadway Improvements District (BID)
board members are requesting that the city install the add alternate alley treatments minus one of
the two pedestrian arch signs nearest the public parking lot in the 1400 block of Broadway (see
attached letter). This will reduce the project costs by $20,000, for a total of $1,386,450.90. This
can be accomplished through a deduct change order after the project is awarded.
J.J.R. Construction is the same contractor who installed the improvements on the north side of
Broadway. They have met all the requirements for the project and have been engaged in the
contracting business under the present name for more than nine years. Experience in work of a
similar nature extends over a period of more than 20 years. In addition, J.J.R. Construction has
installed streetscape improvements for Wells Fargo Bank at the corner of Broadway and Chula
Vista Avenue; sidewalk improvements along Primrose Road and Burlingame Avenue as part of the
reconstruction of Lot K-l and Lot J; and city sidewalk under the annual maintenance program.
Transfer of funds approval The BID in the attached letter are offering to contribute $40,000 towards
the construction of the alley treatments. Along with this contribution, an additional $147,000 will be
required to fund construction of the alleys. This amount will be advanced from the General Fund
Reserve and deducted from a future streetscape budget. Typically $500,000 is budgeted each year
from the General Fund for streetscape improvements. With this advance, the fiscal year 2003-2004
streetscape budget will be reduced to $353,000.
Staff has worked with the Broadway Improvement District members to review the future improvements for
the south side. As discussed with the merchants, the city will be directing the contractor to expedite his
construction schedule with the least disruption to the community. Examples of efforts include construction
on Sundays and early mornings to avoid business hours and reduce traffic impacts; incentives for the
contractor to complete the project early; bimonthly merchant meetings to discuss construction issues; and
the use of a phone information line and web site to enhance communications. Construction for the south
side improvements is expected to start in June, 2002 and be completed by winter, subject to weather
conditions.
BUDGET IMPACT: Funds are available in the streetscape, storm drainage and water budgets to perform
the work. Following is a financial summary including the recommended actions previously discussed:
Expenditures
Construction with modified alleys
Pedestrian arch sign change order deduction
Consultant fees
Construction conting ency (I7 %)
Construction staff administration
Total
Funding Availabilitv
FY 2001-02 CIP budget
FY 2001-02 general fund reserve transfer
FY 2002-03 CIP budget
FY 2002-03 storm drain budget
FY 2002-03 water main replacement
BID contribution
Total
$1,406,451
$ (20,000)
$ 170,000
$ 230,549
$ 70.000
$1,857,000
$ 350,000
$ 147,000
$1,000,000
$ 250,000
$ 70,000$ 40.000
$1,857,000
EXHIBITS: Resolutions, Appropriation Transfer Request, Bid Summary, and April 30,2002 BID letter
to Mayor and Council
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Director of Finance, Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director,
JJR Construction, and Cambridge CM
U:\FILES\Staff Reports and council presentations\SOUTH Broadway Streetscape Contract Award JJR Con 5-20-02.SR.wpd
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT
9511 . BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - 1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY
NO.
AWARDING SOUTH BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY
TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 9511
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
WHEREAS, on APRIL 18,2002, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk and
representatives of the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION, submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the
amount of $1,406,451.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and
Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION for said project in the
amount of $1,406,451, and the same hereby is accepted; and
BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED THERETOthatacontractbe entered into betweenthe successful
bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that
the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute
said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be
furnished by the contractor.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2A02, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
s : \apublicworksdir\proj ects\resolutiomwild
City Clerk
CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROPRTATION TRANSFE&REQUEST
DATE: May7,2002
Fund Reserve - DebitFiscal Year 01{2
Streetscape - CreditFiscal year 01-0247,000751 10 220320
TO:
1. REQUESTTRANSFER
FUND DEPT
101 26115
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
LISTED
AMT
$147,000
PROJ
Justification (Attach Memo if Necessary)
See Staff rbport from MaY 20,2002
HEAD
DATE:BY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ACTION2. X COUNCILACTION REQUIRED
Remarks:
DATE:BY: Jim
AS REVISEDAS REQUESTED
CIry MANAG
3.
Remarks:
RESOLUTION_
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2OO2.2OO3
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, that
WHEREAS, the Department hereinabove named in the Request for Appropriation, Allotment or Transfer of Funds has
requested the transfer of certain funds as described in said Request and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager
has recommended the transfer of funds as set forth hereinabove:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DETERMINED thAt thE TECOMMENdAIiONS Of thE CitY MANAgCT bC
approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected.
MAYOR
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introducedl, ANN T.MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,
at a regular meeting of the City Councilheld on the day
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS
and was adopted thereafter by the
CIryCLERK
&Request.doc
OBJT
FROM:
BID SUMMARY
BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE 1 199 TO 1445 BROADWAY
crw PRoJEcr # 951 1
I OF3
BID OPENING DATE: APRIL 18,2002
ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED r#.1 BID#2
NO.QUANTITY UNIT CiW o Burlinoame R CON.GOLOEN BAY CON.
UNIT PRICE TOTALS
1 Mobilization 1 L- S.s60_000.00 s60.000.00 $30.000.00 $30.000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00
2 Traffic Control System 1 L. S.$20.000.00 $20.000.00 $30.000.00 $30,000.00 s35 000 00 s35.000.00
3 Pedeslrian Acess 1 ts s25 000 00 s25 000 00 s30 000.00 $30.o00.00 s27.000.00 $27.000.00
4 Coordinate with Utilities 1 L.S.s5.oo0.o0 $5.000.00 s10.o00.00 $10.000.00 $9.000.00 $9.000.00
5 Construction Staking 1 L.S.s15.000.00 $15.000.00 $40.000.00 940.000.00 935,000.00 $35,000.00
6 Remove Curb and Gutter 861 I F s't2 00 s10 332 00 slo.00 $8.610.00 s1 1.00 $9.471.00
7 Remove P.C.C.. Paving and Base 7 316,S. F-s5.50 MO.238_00 s13.40 s98.034.40 $12.00 $87.792.00
a Remove Parking Meter Posts 30 EACH $100.00 $3.000.00 $'100.00 $3.000.00 s50 00 s't 500.oo
9 Remove Asphalt Concrete Paving & Base 6.297 S. F.$4.00 s25 1A8 00 s4 00 s2s 188.00 s5.oo $31.485.00
t0 Remove Trees (Magnolias, 10" Dia..)11 EACH s1.oo0.oo s11.000.00 $1.O00.00 $1 1.000.00 $1.200.00 $13.200.00
11 Remove Soil - New Landscape Areas 1 L.S.$14.500.00 $14.500.00 $1 0.000.00 s10 000 00 s't3 000 00 s13.OO0.O0
12 Remove and Replace Failed Subbase (Allowance)25 CY s200 00 s5 000 00 $150.00 $3.750_00 s130.00 s3.250.00
't3 Remove News Racks to Parts Yard ,|L.S.s200.00 $200.00 s4.500.00 $4.500.00 $5.000.00 s5 000 00
14 Remove and Salvage Planter Pots 1 L. S.$2,000.00 s2,000.00 s3 500 00 s3 500 00 s3 700.00 $3.700.oo
15 Remove Sign Posts 1 EACH $1,000.00 s1.000.00 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.00
16 Remove Existing Striping & Pavement Markings 1 L.S.$5,000.00 $5,000.00 s4 000 00 M OOO OO s4 000 00 s4.000.00
CIVIL AND UTILITIES
Potholing 20 EACH $600.00 s 12.000.00 $750.00 $15.000.00 s700 00 s14 000 00
18 Catch Basin C&GO 20 FACH $3,300.00 s66 000.o0 s3.500.oo s70.000.00 s3.300.00 $66.000.00
19 Plastic Pipe 173 L.F.$s0.00 $8.650.00 $60.00 $10.380.00 $60.00 slo 3ao oo
20 Area Drain 6 EACH $650.00 s3 900 00 s't 500 00 s9 000 00 s1.200.00 $7.200.00
21 Storm Drain Pipe - RCP 2l" diameter 435 LF $'r60.00 s6s.600.00 s95.O0 s41.325.00 $100.00 $43.500.00
22 Storm Drain Pipe - RCP lS" diameter 383 L.F.$135.00 $51,705.00 s65 00 s24 8C5 00 s65 00 s24.895.00
23 Stom Drain PiDe - RCP 12'diameter 12e I F,$1 10.00 s14.O80.00 $65.OO $8.320.00 $60.00 $7.680.00
21 Trena-hind 946 L.F.$50.00 $47.300.00 $90.00 $85,140.00 $85.00 sao 410 00
25 3 EACH $4,500.00 s13 500 00 s4 000 00 s1 2 000.00 s4.300.o0 s12.900.00
Storm Drain - Perforated Pipe 150 LF $50.00 s7.500.o0 $60.00 s9.000.00 $55.00 $8,250.00
27 Utiliv Boxes and Pan Lid Covers 20 EACH $2,0o0.00 $40.000.00 $1,000.00 s20 000 00 st 100 00 s22.OO0.OO
Curb and Gutter 423 I F $33.00 s27 15S OO s35.00 s28.805_00 s40.00 $32.920.00
Vertical Gurt 't 39 L. F.$30.00 s4.170.00 $30.00 s4.1 70.00 $30.00 $4,170.00
30 Sidewalk Curb Drains 164 L.F.$20.00 $3.280.00 $30.00 s4 020 00 s50 00 s8.200.00
3t Through Curb Drain with Screen 6 FACH $100.00 s600 00 s200.00 $1_200.00 $300.00 $1.800.00
Full Depth AC (6' deep lifi with min. 2' overlay)1 2A2 S.F.$s.00 s21_410.00 $5.50 $23.55'1.00 $5.50 $23.s51.00
Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete 5.910 S.F.$3.00 $17.730.00 $3.50 s20.685.00 s3 00 sl7 730 00
3/t Asphalt Overlay at Cold Plane Areas 5.910 S.F.$4.00 s23,640.00 s3 50 s20 685 00 s3.o0 $17.730.00
35 Traffc and Curb Striping (painted)2.963 I F $3.00 s8.889.00 $2.O0 s5.926.00 $2.50 s7.407.50
36 Pavement Markings (Painted)80 S.F.$10.00 $800.00 $5.00 $400.00 $5.00 $400.00
a7 Reloete Water Me-leB 11 EACH $500.00 $5.500.00 $550.00 s6 050 00 s600 00 $6.600.oo
Relmte SanitaN Sewer Cleanouts o FACH $400.00 s3 600 00 $550.O0 $4.950.00 s600.o0 $5.400.00
39 Relffite Fire Hydrants EACH $8,000.00 $24.000.00 $4.500.00 $13.500.00 $4,200.00 sl2 600 00
10 New Water Valve in Street ,FA(:H $l,200.00 s2 400 00 s4 500.00 ss.o00.oo s5.000.00 $10.000.00
S:\A Public Works Directory\Prcjec't\951 1\9511 Bid Summary SOUTH 1 199 TO 1/145 Broadway, 2002 Bid Summary SOUTH Broadway
6BaOO2,2:32PM
loeuourroru
lstorm Drain Manhole
BID SUMMARY
BROAOWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE I199 TO 1445 BROADWAY
CITY PROJECT # 9511
20F3
BID OPENING DATE: APRIL 18,2002
a
ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED BID#1 #2
NO_QUANTITY UNIT City of Burlinqame JJ t coN-Con.
UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS
SITE CONSTRUCTION
11 Contrete Sidewalk 942 s. F.s9.00 s8.478.00 $8.50 $8.007.00 $9.00 $8 478 00
42 Concrete Paving (integral color)7.066 S.F.s12.00 $84.792.00 $10.7s $75,959.50 $11 00 s77.726.OO
43 Replace Concrele Under Fagade 200 L. F.$s0.00 $10.000.00 s50 00 s1o.000.00 s55.00 $11 .000.00
44 Parking Meter Post (with bases)'t6 EACH s200 00 s3.200.o0 s200.o0 $3.200.00 $175.00 $2.800.00
45 Posts and Signs 1 L. S.s5.000.00 s5.000.00 $5.500.00 $5,500.00 $5,000.00 s5 000.00
SITE ELECTRICAL
45 Removal of Existing Luminaries and Poles 6 FACH s2 500 00 $1 5 000 00 s900.00 s5.400,00 $1.000.00 $6.000.00
47 New Seruie Cabinet 1 L.S.s10.000.00 s10.000.00 $8.500.00 $8,500.00 s10 000 00 s10.o00.00
48 Pole and Luminaries Relocation 6 EACH $3,500.00 s21,000.00 s2 800 00 s16.800.00 $3.500.00 $2'1.000.00
49 Tree Light Po.rer Outlets 25 EACH s1.000.00 $25.000.o0 9750.o0 $1 8.750.00 $800.00 s20 000 00
50 Underground Conduits 1 L.S.s40.000.00 s40.000.00 $20,000.00 s20,000.00 s21 000.00 s21.000.00
51 Pull Boxes 7 FACH sroo oo s700 00 s750 00 $5.250.00 $700.00 $4.900.00
52 Conductors, Splices, and Terminators 1 L.S.$16.500.00 $16.500.00 $22.000.00 $22.000.00 s22 500 00 s22.500.00
53 Electrical System Testing and Commissioning 1 L.S.s1 0 000 00 slo ooo oo s4 400.00 s4.400_00 s4.500.00 s4.500.00
SITE ACCESSORIES
il Planter Pots - 2 foot diameter 18 EACH $1.100.00 $19.800.00 sr ooo oo s1a ooo o0 s1. t 00.00 s19.800.00
55 Trash Receptacles - New 5 EACH s2.o00.00 s't0.000.00 s1.850.00 s9.250.O0 s1.700.00 s8 500 00
56 Relocate Existing Trash Receptacles 4 EACH s300.00 $1.200.00 $250.00 st ooo oo s250.00 s1.000.00
57 Relocate Eilsting Mail Box 1 FACH s500 00 $500 00 $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $900.00 $900.00
58 Relocate Existing Pay Phone 1 EACH $1.000.00 s1.000.00 $1.000.00 $1,000.00 sl ooo oo s1.o00.oo
59 Bikes Racks 5 EACH sl ooo oo s5 000 00 s500.oo s2.500.00 $600.00 $3.000.00
60 Precast Concrele Seat Walls 6 EACH s12.000_00 $72.000.00 $15.000.00 $90.000.00 $15,500.00 ss3 000 00
ai Metal Planting Barier 71 L.F,$ 1 35.00 $9,585.00 s250 00 s17 750 00 s250.00 $17.750.00
LANOSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
62 lnigation System 1 L.S.s45.000.00 $45.000.00 $40.o@.00 $40,000.00 s40 000 00 s40.oo0.00
63 Backfill Placements 98 c.Y..s70.00 s6 860 00 s50 00 s4.900.00 s45.00 s4.410.00
64 Trees,36'Box 23 EACH s1 300.00 $29.900.00 $575.00 $13.225.00 $550.00 s1 2 650 00
65 Trees,24'Box 2 EACH $750.00 s1.500.00 $310.00 $620.00 s300 00 $600.00
66 Shrubs,5 Gallon 222 EACH $30.00 s5 660 00 s30 00 s6.660_00 s31.00 $6.882.00
67 Shrubs, 1 Gallon (Allowance)524 EACH s15.00 s7.920.00 $20.00 $10.560.00 $20.00 sto 560 00
68 Plants, 4' Potrs 102 EACH $5.00 s51 0.00 $10.00 s1.020.00 s9 00 s918.00
69 Bark Mulch 998 S.F.$1.00 $998.00 sl 50 s1.497.O0 $1.60 $1.596.80
70 Root Barier (Biobanier)745 L. F.si4 rx)s10 430 00 $11 .OO s8_195.00 s10.00 $7.450.00
7'l Plant Establishment Period 1 L.S.s3.000.00 s3.000.00 $3.500.00 $3.500.00 $4.000.00 Srt OOO O0
Replace Existing Grasses with Day Lilies 66 EACH $30.00 $1.980.00 $30.00 s't s80 00 s33.00 $2.1 78.00
SUBTOTAL (item's 1-72)31.203.38/t.00 $1,199.707.90 11.233.220.30
S:\A Public Works Directory\Proiect\gs11\9511 Bid Summary SOUTH I 199 TO 1/+45 Broadway,2OO2 Bid Summary SOUTH Broadway
51312002,2:32PM
Golder
I
#2ESTIMATEDITEM
coN.Go en Bav Con.QUANTITY UNIT Citv of BurlinqameNO.
TOTALS
ADD ALTERNATE . ALLEY CONSTRUCTION
s1 2 500 00 ss 000.00 $5.000.o0 s6.000.00 s6.000.00A1Mobilization,|L.S.$12,500.00
1 ts s4 000 00 S4.OOO.O0 $10.000.00 s10.000.00 $9.500.00 $9,500.00MConstruclion Staking
s2 000 00 $2 500 00 s2.500.o01L.S.$2.000.00 s2.000.00 s2,000.00A3Coordinate with Utilities
Demolition
s5 941 00 s5.00 s6.310.00 M.50 $5.679.00A4Remove P.C.C. Paving and Base 1.262 S.F $5.50
441 SF s4 00 s1.764.00 s4.00 $1.764.00 $4.00 $1,7M.00A5Remove Asphalt Conclete Paving and Base
s5 000 00 s4 500 00 $4.500.o01L.S.s2.500.00 $2.500.00 $5.000.00A6Remove Soil- New Landscape Areas
s3 500 00 s3.500.o0 $4.000.00 $4.000.00A7Remove and Salvage Planter Pots and Benches 1 L.S.s1.000.00 $1,000.00
ts st ooo oo sl o00.o0 s2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.400.00 $2.400.00A8Remove Metal Bollards 1
Civil and Utilities
s550 00 s8 800.00 s600.00 s9.600.0016EACH$500.00 $8.000.00A9Relocate Water Meters
1 F,ACH s4OO OO M00.00 $s50.00 $550.00 $500.00 $500.00A10Relocate Sanitary Sewer Cleanouts
M 400 00 s4.400.001EACHs1.500.00 $1.500.@ $4.500.00 $4,500.00A1lRelocate Water Valve
sl0 640 00 sl 50 00 s19.950.00 s150.00 $19.950.00A-12 Sanitary S€wer Line, 6 inch PVC 133 L.F.$80.00
s4 500 001EACHs5.500.o0 s5.500.00 s4.000.00 $4.000.00 $4.500.00A13Sanitary Sewer Manhole
st ooo oo s6.000.o0 $1.100.00 $6.600.00allUtility Boxes and Pan Lid Covers 6 EACH $2.000.00 $12.000.00
s.t 120002ALFs45 00 s1.260.00 s50.00 $1.400.00 M0.00A15vertical Curt, 9'x 9"
s13 30a 50 s10.50 s12.999.001.234 S.F.$12.00 $14.856.00 $10.75416Concrete Paving
s50 00 s6 250 00 s50.00 $6.250.00 $55.00 $6.875.00A17Replace concrete Under Fagade (Allo$rance)125 L.F.
s5 00 s740.o0148S.F-$5.00 $740.00 $5.50 $814.00418Full Depth Asphalt Conclete
Site Accessories
sr1 000 00 s42 000.002EACHs32.O00.00 s64.O00.00 $20.000.00 $40.000.00A19Pedestrian Arch
s6 000 00 s6 m0.o0 s6.500.o0 $6.500.001EACH$'10.000.00 $10,000.00MOMetal Gate
17 FACH st 100 00 s1 8.700.00 $1.000.00 s'17.000.00 s1.050.00 $17.850.00421Planter Pots - 2 foot diameter
s7 000 00 s1.200.00 s8_400.007EACH$2.200.00 $15.400.00 $1.000.00N2Planter Pots - 3 foot diameter
s1 200 00 s4 AOO OO s2.500.00 $10.000.00 s2.500.00 $10,000.00423Benches4EACH
Landscaping and lrrigation
sl3 500 00 s13 500.00 s13.600_00 $13.600.00,|L.S.s15.000.00 $15,000.00I.24 lnigation System
sl 700 005CYs70 00 $350.O0 s350.00 $1.750.00 $340.00A.25 Backfill Placement
szl50 00 $900.o02EACHs500.00 $1.000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00A.26 Replant Existing ltalian Cypress
s30 00 $6S0.00 s33.00 $759.00427Shrubs,5 Gallon 23 EACH $30.00 $690.00
139 FACH s15 00 s2.085.00 $20.00 $2.780.00 $20.00 $2,780.00A2AShrubs, 1 Gallon
s3 ()4O OO s11 00 $3.344.OO304EACHs5.00 $1.520.00 s10.00A29Plants, 4'pots
s1 50 s826.50 s1.50 $826.50a30Bart Mulch 551 S.F.$1.00 $551.00
IF s14 00 s714.00 $10.o0 $510.00 $1 1.00 $561.00A31Root Banier 51
s1.100.o0'l L.S.$1.O00.o0 $1.000.00 s1.000.00 s1,000.00 $1,100.00432Plant Establishment
$206.743.00 s213,947.50SUBTOTAL ADD ALTERNATE (itEM'S A1-A31)$228,661.00
SUMMARY OF BID:
31.203.384.00 $1,199,707.90 91,233,22O.tOSUBTOTAL OF ITEMS 1.58
$213.947.503228,661.00 $206,743.00SUBTOTAL OF ITEMS A1-A31
$'l-432.0.15.00 $1.406.450.90 $1.447,167.80TOTAL CONTRACT
BID SUMMARY
BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE 1I99 TO 1445 BROADWAY
CITY PROJECT # 95.I1
30F3
BID OPENING DATE: APR|L lS,2002
a
S:\A Public Works
5E|2OO2,2:32PM
TO 1445 Broadway,2002 Bid Summary
\_,
-arr-zu
BROADWAY BUSINESS TMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Apn|30,2002 1399 Broadway, Burlingame, CA 94010
Mayor Janney & City Council
Burlingame City Hall
501 Pnmrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re; Broadway Allev Work
Honorable Mayor & City Council
EGEIVE
PUBLIC
CITY OF BURLINGAME
lt/lAY - 3 2002
)!dc.P
d+
B'I'D' asks that you consider moving forward yith the Broadway Alley beautification plan. Inorder to save $20,000, we recommend that on the 1400 block of'Broadway that the ped'estrianarch nearest the parking lot be eliminated and the arch near the sidewalk be maintained in thepran.
D),
Additionally,the Broadway merchants,B.I.D., are offering a $40,000 contributionthrough
towards the alley project. Payments to be made as follows: $20,000 this year; $10,000 in 2003and $10,000 in 2004. This arrangement will allow B.LD. to continue its existing programs,including a contribution to the hotel shuttle, street gardening efforts and monetaryrncentives to induce owners and merchants to
cleaning,
repaint and repair their facades and awningsMoreover, B.I.D. offers S2,000 towards the replanting of day lilies where we now have the
Bruce
President B.I.D Board
\
B
David Hinckle,
ve Armanino
of
Wry
Board of Directors,
Preston,
Dr
of .I.D.
@
z.
tr
m
E
ffiE
!
!
I
E
<^>lt !
gH
m
\f,ot-r
!D
o so
Ol,s
-rmCl
ffi
lrl
G-{
a
a
o
t-z
&2
r!d
-A
l.
t_t
IJc
UJoz.
J
ffivs
d
B,
N
a
ll-=
hr
@ffi
tsffi8
ffiEE
=ffi
Concemed Merchant Merchant
EI.-
D
t--l. --
EE
of Directors, B.I.D.
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 13,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
5t20toz
7e
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROV!NG AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SE ES WITH NOLTE ASSOC]ATES
FOR THE HYATT PUMP STATION RE-CONSTRUCTION - CITY PROJECT NO. 8704
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving an agreement wittr
NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC.for design engineering services for the Hyatt Pump Station Reconstruction. The total
amount of the contract is $83,872.
BACKGROUND: In March 2002, a request for proposals was issued to five engineering firms for design
engineering services. Staff interviewed two firms that responded and selected Nolte- Associites based on ttreir
proposal, the interview, and discussion with previous clients. They have extensive experience in the design of pump
station facilities.
It is estimated ttrat the design phase will be completed within four months. In fall 2002, staff will return to Council
for the award of a construction conffact as well as an agreement for construction phase professional services.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement
BUDGET IMPACT: The 200112C[l2 Capital Improvement Budget includes funding for these services.
Philip B.P.E.
Senior Civil
pa
c City Clerk, Nolte Associates Inc
f : \apublicworks\staf f reportB\B?04. 6Ef
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 14,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
7f
5t20to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT.TENTATIVE AND FTNAL PARCEL MAp FOR LOT COMBtNATI LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, 6, AND
17 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 4, TOWN OF BURLINGAME, 1310-1316 BAYSWATER AVENUE AND
121 PARK ROAD, PM O2-O2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council concur with the Planning Commission and approve this
map. This action should be considered as approving both ttre Tentative and Final Map to facilitate processing.
Following are the conditions:
o { Final Map for a lot merger shall be filed by the applicant within the time period allowed by the Subdivision
Map Act and the City's subdivision ordinance.
o The Final Map must be filed with the San Mateo County office before a building permit is issued.
. All property corners shall be set and shown on the Final parcel Map.
o The Final Map shall show the width of the right-of-way for Bayswater Avenue, Park Road and Primrose
Road, including the centerline of the righrof-way, bearings and distance of the centerline and any existing
monuments in the roadway.
o All existing easements shall be retained.
. All damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new.
BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed that attached Staff Report and the
Tentative and Final Parcel Map. The Planning Commission found that all requirements were met and recommended
that Council approve the map with the above conditions.
EXHIBITS: Tentative and Final Map, Staff Report
T. Chang, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, Applicant
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\02-{2.STF.wpd
RE
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ENGINEERING
DATE: APRIL 30,2002
TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION, LOTS 1
THROUGH 4, 6, AND 17 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 4, TOWN OF BURLINGAME,
1310-1316 BAYSWATER AVENI]E AND I2I PARK ROAD, PMO2-02
This application is to combine four (a) existing lots into one (1) lot at 1310-1316 Bayswater
Avenue and 121 Park Road. The applicant is proposing an on-site improvement which will
require a lot combination in order to meet the zoning code.
There zre no comments from the Building Department and Planning Department.
The map application is complete and therefore may be recommended to the City Council for
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. A final parcel map for lot merger must be filed by the applicant within the time period as
allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Action on this
map should be considered as both the tentative and final map to facilitate processing.
2. The final map must be filed with the San Mateo County office before a Building Permit can
be issued.
3. All property corners shall be set and sho'.r.,rr on the final parcel map.
4. The final map shall show the width of the righrof-way for Bayswater Avenue, Park Road and
Primrose Road, including the centerline right-of-way, bearing and distance of centerline and
any existing momrments in the roadway.
5. All existing easements shall be retained.
6. All damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new.
Exhibit: Tentative Parcel Map & Assessor's Map
. Chang
Senior Civil Engineer
U :VICTOR\Projects\Private\PM02. 02.wpd
Agenda ltem .2.
Meeting Date 1n lo)
$2,879,099.24
Ck. No.82191 - 82729
Excludes Library Cks. 82191 - 82237
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
4"uC->
Payroll for April 2002
$1,590,438.07
Ck. No. 147835 - 148337
.EFTS for April 2002
$390,966.04
.ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
STFINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
(
05- 03- 2002
NAME
THIS IS TO
I IICLUSI VE.
TIIE AMOU}IT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
CITY OT BURLINGATIE
11 ARRAIiT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . 01.02
TUND
101
320
326
526
,?7
528
518
619
620
621
625
731
896
n ,725 .82
107,609.75
4,086.00
6,419.93
207 ,542.60
3,157.91
PAGE 10
AI.{OUNT
357.17
7,411.50
1 ,464.23
1 ,569.54
836,08
140,916.41
990.93
s560 ,527 .87TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
llot'IoRABLE t'lAYoR AND clTY COUNclt!
CERTIFY THAT TIIE CLAII.{S TISTED ON PAGES NUI,IBERED FROI,I 1 THROUGH '10
A[o./oR ctAl]rs ]tutiBERED tROt4 82613 IHROUGIi 82729 IilCLUSM,TOTALING lN
OF $560,527.87, }IAVE BEEN CHECKEO I}I DETAIL A}ID APPROVED BY THE PNOPER
AI.ID III I.tY OPINIOII REPRESENT TAIR ANO JUST CIIARGES AGAINST THE CITY I}I
!,ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREOII.
FI}IANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYIIENT
couitct L
DATE
DATE
(
GENERAL FUiJD
CAPTTAL II.IPROVEMENTS FUND
!,ATER CAPIIAL PROJECT FUIID
!,ATER FUND
SEUER FUND
SOLIO I,'ASTE FUND
SELF INSURAIICE TU}IO
FACILITIES SERVI CES TUND
EOUIPI4EIIT SERVI CES TUND
INFORI.IATIOI.J SERVICES FUI.ID
FIRE I{ECHAiI I C SERVICES FUIID
TRUST A}ID AGE}ICY TUND
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER
05/03t02
VENDOR DETAI L
'*r Denotes Hand 9ritten Checks
PAGE 9
A}IOUNT
3, 150.00
NUMBER NAI.IE
827?9
TOTAL
GE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEiIS 23560
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
ACCO{JNT
3,1s0.00 326 79290 210
(((
$560,527.87
(
CITY OF BURLIIIGAMEIIARRAIIT REGISTER
05 /03/02
VENOOR OETAILr*t oenotes Hand Lhitten checks
PAGE 8
A}4OUNT
600.00
500.00
400.00
1 ,316.00
80.00
150.00
150.00
825.00
3,157,91
812.50
6,278.5O
3,000.00
CAL STATE BUt LDERS
BUSIIIESS LICENSE REFUIID
82719 AI4BER COT,|STRUCT IOI{
DEPOSIT REIUIIOS
BAKER CO}IS]RUCTIO}I
I.iISCELLANEOUS
82717 VA TONG ROOFIIIG
I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS
LENA },IUGHAXIIAM
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JAIIES GO}IEZ
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
CA}IBRIA ENVIRONMENTAT
DEPOSIT REFUI,IDS
iIC CALL ION CONSTRUCTIOil
I,I I SCE L LAI/ EOUS
CANT!/ELL ASSOC
CAPITAL EOUIPI{ENT
ACCdJNT
600.00 101 68010 220 1581
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
/100.00 101 68010 220 1581
'1,346.00 731 22546
206.75 '101 31510
80.00 101 30700
'150,00 731 22520
150.00 731 22520
825.00 7a1 22546
IIUI4BER I,IAI.IE
82713
82715
82716
82714
82720
82721
82722
42726
827?7
236t+4
23645
23646
23647
23648
23649
23650
?3651
23652
23653
23654
23655
24656
23657
23658
FREEMAiI-DESI GNS
iIISC. SUFPLIES
MI SCELLAIIEOIIS
82723 scs E|{GTNEERS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
00
00
'101 68010 120 1323
731 22533
180
270
82725 ADVENT BUSIiIESS I.IACHINES
EOUI P},IEIIT }.iAI NT,
3,157.91 528 66500 210
812.50 320 80302 220
/,5.00 '101 64150 200
6,278.50 101 68010 800 1101
3,000,00 731 22516
JAI.{ES FOHLER
I,I I SCELLANEOT',S
82724 00EsT SoFTHARE SYSTEUS
FINE APPARATUS I.IAIilT.
23659 249.00 625 65213 203
219 -OO
82714 CLARE EVAIIS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
((
2.06.75
450.00
45.00
42724 DONALD STENBERG
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
(
NUI{BER NAI.IE
82598
82700
42701
82705
82706
82708
8?709
8?710
CITY OF BURLIIICII4EIJARRAIIT REGISTER
05t03t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hard lrritten Checks
PACE 7
AI,IOUNT
500- 00
990.00
1 ,060.00
3,960.41
5,993.90
67, 5.65
10, t 30. 15
2a1.21
6.80
2,400.00
1,058.00
1,058.00
1,450-00
314,7?
TARA PRATT
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
82699 MERIT RESOURCE GROUP
TETIPORARY EI.IPLOY}IENT SVC.
ACCCIJNT
990.00 101 64420 011
512.00
548.00 621
I ,751.10
2,206.31
101 58010 110'1100
101 68010 800 'l 100
5,993.90 3?0 75110 210
67,865.65 320 71171 220
'f 0,130.15 320 75110 210
23153
82702 NovA PARTT{ERS, I[C.
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23236
82703 SAN CoNSTRUCT ION, INC,
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
?3328
OFFICE DEPOI
OFFI CE EXPENSE
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IEI,/T
8?701 IIARRIS DESIGN
PROfESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
PI TNEY EOI.IES
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY HALL I.IAI}ITENANCE
IIOI'IE DEPOT
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
RECALL. TOTAL INFORMATIOI'I I.iGMT
MI SCELLANEOUS
82707 MARK PACE
EOUI PI.IE}IT MAtNT.
23040
23076
23128
23329
23384
23111
23157
23599
23622
0 220
200
00
64450
65
193.77
90.44
619 6t+160 120 5120
619 61160 130
JUL IE DAVIS
TRAI II IIIG EXPENSE
BRIAN GATES
TRAIIIII/G EXPE}ISE
KATI'ILEEN OORE PROPERTIES
RENTS & LEASES
6.80 731 2251a
2,400.00 101 65150 200
1,058.00 101 65100 260
'1,058.00 101 65100 260
1,450.00 320 76010 180
314.72 619 64460 210 5120
82712 t.II CHELLE BRI STOL
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
23613 600.00 101 68010 220 1581
600.00
(
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
(
23600
82711 REFRIGERATIO},I SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 25639
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S
CITY OF EURLIIIGAI,IEt,JARRANT REGISTER
05 t03/02
VENDOR DETATL,*' Denotes HEnd Lrritten Checks
PAGE 6
AI'IOUNT
1 ,238.83
40.00
2, 185 .60
20.15
500- 00
905.95
3,497.50
30.00
'170.00
520.00
700.00
714.34
402.62
300.00
82681 PROVIDENCE PEST TERTIITE
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ACCOUNT
40,00 619 64460 210 5150
2,185.60 101 68010 220 1584
20.15 896 202A1
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
905.95 101 65200 205
3,197.50 731 22546
30,00 620 15000
170,00 10't 68010 220 1461
520.00 896 202A1
700.00 10'l 680t0 220 1581
NUI,4BER I'IAi1E
82689
8?690
8269',I
82694
82695
82696
201 -20
859 - 9'l
177.72
101 61250 ',t10
101 65300 120
526 69020 110
82685 VB GOLF LLC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82686 AT&T
UTILITY EXPENSE
8?647 DAVID I.'EDEKII.IG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
219(a
2213A
22262
22197
22514
22633
22842
22899
22924
23036
?2672
42692 SA}I MATEO REGIONAL NET!/ORK, INC. 22759
UTILITY EXPENSE
82693
GROVE CO}ISTRUCTIOII
I.I I SCELLANEd,lS
EXPRESS TOIJING
SUPPLIES
ROBERTA TAVAKE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CARL DEOUANT
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
PEN INSULA UII I FORI{ & EOUIPIIENT
UN I FORI.IS AIID EOUIP}IENT
IISCELLA EC[rS
I I'IAG I ST ICS
OFFICE EXPENSE
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
357.17
357.17
101 65100 140
61a 64520 604
110.62
292.00
101 65100 110
101 65100 220
RAYMOIID FRAYNE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 58010 220 1581
8?697 NANCY OBED IN
COI'IIRACTUAL SERVICES
23039
500.00 101 68010 220 1581
500.00
(((
82683 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF TI,IE I,JEST, t 21819
OFFICE EXPENSE
Il I SC. SUPPTIES
OFFI CE EXPENSE
82688 RADIO ACCESSORY HEADOUARTERS
RADIO I.IAINT.
?1947
(
I]UT,IBER IIA}4E
82670
82671
8?673
a2674
82675
82676
426-ta
82679
82680
82681
82642
CITY OF BURLINGA}IE!IARRANT REGISTER
05 t03/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks
OAPPER TIRE CO., INC.
SUPPLI ES
82672 oEi,rllts fiASKETT
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
82669 AT&T I.JIRELESS
co,t u[ I cAT I 0N S
C.H.8ULL CO}IPANY
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IA I IIT.
LARRY ANDERSOII
t.I I SCELLANEOUS
CATHERINE J.M. NILT'IEYER
I.I I SCE L LAN EOt,S
H,V. CARTER CO., INC.
BLDG. & GRq'NDS I.IAIIIT.
EOUIPMENT I.IAI}IT.
SPAR]AII TOOL LLC
MISC, SUPPLIES
UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC.
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAIIIT.
ACCOUNT
595,98 101 65100 160
16.21 101 68020 190 2200
1,001.70 620 15000
500,00 101 68010 220 1581
a3.q 101 64350 031
500.00 731 22525
6,382.46 101 65400 800
1,545.00 101 68010 190 1101
317.1A 527 66.520 120
587.08 625 65213 203
400.00 101 68010 220 1581
2,801.00 10'1 37010
1,050.09 320 80120 200
DELL I{ARKETING L, P.
CAPTTAL EAUIPI4ENT
8267 DUPONT TLOORING SYSTEI.IS
8LDG, & 6Rd.iNDS r'rAl[r.
20301
20159
20161
20654
20716
20801
20a76
20900
21075
2',1329
?1543
21708
21767
21A11
AMOUNT
595.98
16.21
1 ,oot+.70
500.00
83.47
500,00
6,382,46
317.18
587.08
400.00
2,801.00
1,050.09
808 80SCH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TURBo 0ATA SYSTEMS, I[C.
I.I I SCELLANEOTJS
I,IETI.JORK IEtECO.IPUT I NG
EOUIPMENT t.IAI NT.
((
PAGE 5
1 ,516.79
287 ,76
101 68020 190 2200
101 68020 200 2200
1 ,804.55
1,545.00
(
NUMBER NAiIE
82654
82663
82665
LYNNE FIRESTONE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
CLEARLITE TROPHIES
UI,I I FORI.IS ANO EOUIPi.IE}IT
(
ACCOUNT
621.00 101 68010 220 1231
2,121.00 619 64460 210 5180
53,00 101 66100 2/.0
246.40 101 64420 210
758.36 101 68010 120 1450
9t3,00 101 68010 120 1323
518.93 101 65200 200
817.29 101 68020 140 2200
CITY OT BURL INGAI,IEIIARRANT REGISTER
05 /03t02
VENOOR DETAILr*r oenotes tlard lrritten Checks
PAGE 4
AUOUNT
621.00
2,124 .OO
53.00
246.10
758.36
5',t8.93
417.29
2,830,00
1 ,485.00
5',t .00
3,755.00
5s3.75
520 -00
BAY ALARM
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
82656 AMERICAN !/ATER L'ORKS ASS}/.
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
82657 PREFERRED AI.LIAIICE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
82658 r.rr LESToIE PR@UCTS
Mtsc. SUPPLtES
82659 SIX FLAGS MARINE UORLD
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
82655
826tr0 I,II}IOLTA BUSI I{ESS SYSTEI{S
EoutP Ei,lT itAtilT.
42661
18716
18854
18951
19025
19028
19119
't9131
19679
19710
19791
19814
20060
20105
20246
CIUCCI COXSULTIIIG GROUP INC
CO}ITRACIUAL SERVICES
82664 ART DOLLOSSO
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
ALL FENCE Co PAi,tY, I[C.
BLDG, & GROIJ}IDS MAINT.
8LDG. & GROUNDS iIAI}.IT.
415.00
415.00
526 69020 190
527 66520 190
66
67
67
101 66210 180
526 59020 180
527 &520 180
1,485.00 101 65300 220
5 1 . 00 101 6A010 220 1462
PEN IIISUTA CORRTDOR JOINT
RE}.JTS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
RENTS & IEASES
25
25
EL CAIII I/O CNARTER LTNES IIIC
I,I I SC. SUPPL!ES
82667 AttrlirTEL cc$fiIUNIcATIO S
cot4tluNtcAT I0Ns
42666
82668 CENTRAL GANDEil CEI,ITER
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
553.7s 101 68010 120 1323
20300
442.30
442.31
526 69020 1zo
527 6t520 120
884.61
(
915.00
82662
520.00 621 61450 160
(
NUMBER NAME
82640
82641
82642
82643
82644
82645
82646
82618 SERVICE PRESS, INC.
OFFICE EXPENSE
82650
82651
8?652
a2&9 co,rP usA
EOUI PiIENT I.IAI XT.
STANDARD REGISTER
OITICE EXPENSE
SPI NNAKER SAILING
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I.I I LLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
MISCELLANEOI,IS
(
ACCOUNT
't01 65200 110
101 65500 120
101 65200 140
101 65200 240
101 65200 250
101 65200 260
627.74 527 66520 120
21.63 526 69020 160
105.44 101 65300 120
1,601.15 101 65210 218
31.62 101 64350 120
1,645.80 101 65100 220
82,27 '101 66',100 110
L24.12 320 80420 200
596,16 101 64250 110
1,188.00 101 68010 2?0 1462
2,304.00 101 61120 031
CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IEL/ARRANT REGISTER
05t03t02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand t titten Checks
PAGE 3
CHIEF 8I LL REILLY
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
UII I FORI.IS AND EOUIPMENI
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
TRAVEL & I4EETI}.IGS
TRAI N I NG EXPE}ISE
'1'1568
11640
1383/+
14538
14371
15595
16555
16687
17495
17784
71
296
122
25
54
298
76
88
00
00
32
AI.IOUNT
627.71
21.63
105.44
62.22
'1,50't .13
31.62
1 ,645.80
82.27
428,12
596.16
'r , 188.00
2,304.00
!/ECO I NDUSTRIES, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
RADIO SHACK
co4 uN I CAT I 0|t S
IC80- IltT I L CoIIFERE CE 0F
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
AT&T
UTILITY EXPE}.ISE
DE!'EY PESI CONTROL
RAT CO TROL PROGRAI,{
RITZ CAI'IERA
I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES
82647 ALL CITY I'IAIIAGEI.IE II T
COIITRAC]UAL SERVICES
14546
82653 TABOR READY, INC.
TEI4PORARY EMPLOYI.IENT SVC.
18659
578.00 526 69020 011
678.00
62.22 A96 202A1
(
868.37
11719
't3940
CI TY OF BURLIIIGAMEI.'ARRA}iT REGISTER
05 /03/02
VEIIDOR DETAIL.*r Denotes Hand uritten Checks
PAGE 2
AI,iOUNT
388.56
880.00
724.a7
130, 159.07
39,087.00
2,100.00
11 ,393.52
129.90
58,34
936.00
2,928.O0
,,283.74
378.00
810.00
82626
82627
82628
8?6?9
82631
82634
SAN I{ATEO COUNTY CONVENTION &
I'IISCELLAIIEOUS
82530 ctTy 0t souTH sAll FRAllctsco
OTHER AGEITCY CO}ITR IBUT IONS
PACI FIC BELL
UTILITY EXPENSE
STEPHEII J. PI CCH I
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I,IARGARET PRENDERGAST
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
SEOUOIA AIIALYTICAL LAES
I.i I SCELLANEOUS
LIEST GROUP PAY}IENT CTR.
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
RD OFFI CE SOLUTIONS
MISC. SUPPLIES
OTFICE EXPEI{SE
LEONA MORIARTY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ACCOUIJT
388.56 896 20281
880.00 101 68010 220 1584
724.87 101 6a010 220 1341
130,159.07 751 22587
39,087.00 527 66s30 270
2,100.00 526 69020 233
11,393.52 320 76350 ??0
82632 TII.IBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC,
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
82633
03'168
o3179
03131
03483
03760
0396/r
09213
09270
09461
09881
09979
14.64
39 .70
526 69020 120
527 66520 110
82635 TESTII.IO ENGI NEERS, IXC.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
82639
82637 CALLANOER ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
82638 CRAIG !/. REED
COIIIRACTUAL SERVICES
936.00 326 A0320 220
2,928.00 101 65100 291
5,283.74 320 71171 210
378.00 101 68010 220 1587
840.00 101 68010 220 1344
(((
I]UiIBER NAI,iE
03080
03536
1?9.90 101 64350 120
82636 sAlr tlATEO CoUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433
PRISONER EXPENSE
CITY OT SURL INGAI,IEI,JARRAI.iT REGISTER
05 /03/02
VEI.IDOR DETAILr*r oenotes HErd tllitten Checks
ACC(UI.JT
PAGE 1
AI,4OUNT
5,899. 14
121 .7A
8,946.27
2,301 .67
603.00
2,263.82
164,402.OO
I ,339.63
500.00
261 .62
129.53
153.50
NUMBER NAI,4E
42613
82611
82615
BAUER CO{PNESSORS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI [T.
ACTIO}I CLEANING SERVICE
EOUIPI.IEiIT I.IAINT.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
BLDG. & GROUNDS IIAINT.
l0l 65400 200
619 64460 220 5110
621 64450 190
101 68010 114 1100
101 68010120 1323
731 22543
01030
01309
01624
01637
021 ',t 0
02244
02?61
02360
02410
o2n5
02819
349.03
5 ,018.57
501.51
1,800.00
6,134.23
1,012.O4
121.78 101 65200 203
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE
I.I I SCELLAilEqJS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
T.IISCELLANEOUS
BURLIIIGAME CHAI,IBER OF COI,4I.{ERCE
CIAHBER OF CO,4HERCE PttT.
82617 BURLIIIGAXE RECREATION DEPT.
RECREAIIOX EXPEiISES
US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
COTTRACTUAL SERVICES
01663
82618 DULIN ADVERTISING INC,
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
02036
82619
2,301.67 101 64550 ',t51
603.00 101 10700
2,263.82 101 64120 150
161,102.00 527 66530 220
255.43 526 69020 260
82620 L'.9. GRAINGER, INC.
TRAI},IING EXPEIISE
82621
82622
8?623
82624 LAlisoN PRo0ucTs, IIc.
SUPPLI ES
GRAIIITE ROCK COI1PAIIY
SIOEI]ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE
CIIARLES J. HAPP
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
HASELEACH SURVEYI I,IG I IISTRUiIENT
I.IISC. SUPPLIESi sc. suPPLlEs
500.00 101 68010 220 '1581
239
100
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
202.08
59.51
320 40270 120
526 59020 120
34
29
429,53 520 15000
153.60 101 65300 011
(((
255.13
82625 MANPO!'ER
TEI.IPORARY EMPLOYI.IENT SVC.
04-26-2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL II'{PR0VE}'IENTS FUND
I.JATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I.IATER FUND
SE!'ER FUNO
GOLT CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPIITENT SERVICES FUND
INIORMATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAMELIARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 01-02
(((
132.66
502.10
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
044.74
192.64
793.13
28,
118,
75,
5,
2,
13,
13,
?,
l+,
1,
14,
49,
FUND
101
320
326
5?6
5?7
529
518
619
620
521
525
731
736
896
469.03
225.84
707.86
649.56
304-70
855 .56
071.31
32-44
423.18
9330,404.75
(Z*z oo> "c:f
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROI,JGH 9
AND/oR CLAIMS NUMBERED FRor't 82503 THRoucH 82612 INCLUSM,TOTALING IN
0F $330,404.75, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED By THE pROpER
AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
I.,ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNCI L DATE
6":-t 6 t
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS I VE ,
THE AI{OUNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
23638
82509 REFRIGERATIOII SUPPLIES DISTRIBU] 23659
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
JEAN HORIOI,I
MI SCELLANEOUS
BKF ENGIIIEERS
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
IED O}JYANG
TRA!NING EXPEI.JSE
(
ACCOUNT
325.00 731 22543
200.00 731 22513
504.22 731 22543
131.92 619 64460 120 5220
549,75 101 64420 262
6,419.40 3?O 79420 210
604.72 '101 65300 260
CITY OF BURLIIIGAI,4E!/ARRAI,IT REGISTER
04/26/02
VENOOR DETAI L
'*' Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks
PAGE 8
Al,l0UNT
325.00
200.00
131 .92
549.75
6,119.40
604.72
s330,404.75
BAY AREA PARENT (STPEN/NO.BAY) 23636
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
82507 I,IARIA PADILLA
}IISCELLANEOT]S
NUII1BER NAME
82606
82608
8261 '1
8261?
TOTAL
23637
23610
23641
23642
((
504.22
82610 LA SALSA
TRAINI}iG EXPENSE
VE}'/DOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand gritten Checks
345.00
500.00
101 36600
731 22525
A}'IOUNT
12,361,44
4,230.00
550.00
154.00
84.00
960.00
51.75
2,000.00
845.00
2,150.00
413.60
46.32
145.00
800.00
764.12
NUI.4BER NAME
82590
8?591
82592
42593
82591
82595
82596
82598
82599
82600
82601
82603
LONE STAR LANDSCAPE
CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
CULVER GROUP
PROTESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S
ICE CE}ITER OF SAN I4ATEO
CO}iTRACTUAL SERVICES
COREY SII.ION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JEF F SCHI.]ARTZ
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CHARLES SCI1EI{BRI
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
PETERSO}I
SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
12,361.11 520 80140 220
4,230.00 320 80570 210
560.00 101 68010 220 1152
154.00 101 68010 220 1587
84.00 101 68010 220 1587
960.00 731 22520
54.75 3?0 75170 130
2,000.00 731 22520
GERALD TAYLOR
SiIALL TOOLS
42597 ERNEST ROGERS JR.
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
BIU},JK DEXATTE I ASSOCIATION
r.t I scEttA Eurs
}II SCELLA}IEOUS
JOHN JONES
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
RO8 IIALLICK
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
PA BLool.t
iIISCELLAI{EOUS
82602 SHRM
DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
23375
23448
23512
23609
23610
23621
23626
23627
2362A
23629
23630
23631
23632
23633
23634
2,'150.00 731 22520
11r.60 619 64460 210
46.32 526 22502
800.00 520 15000
764.12 731 225A5
82605 INPRO CORPORAT ION
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIzED S
23635
990.58 619 64460 210 5120
990.58
(
A2604 STYLERS
I ScELLA EOUS
(
CI TY OF EURLITIGAME
!/A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
04/26/02
(
PAGE 7
115.00 101 61120 ?40
(
NUMEER NAI.iE
82575
82576
82580
82583
82588
825n vALt C@PER Al,tD ASSoCIATES, INC. 22813
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
HELUIG COIISTRUCTION
I.IISCELLANEOUS
82577 EXPRESS TO!'ING
SI,'PPL IES
82578 ABSOLUTE CELLULAR
CO4IIUN I CAT I ON S
JONES AND I.IAYER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL1ZED S
}IARSIEN STREET PARTNERS
RENTS & LEASES
ROPERS, MAJESX I , KOHN & BEiITLEY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
DIRECTV
COMMUNICAT IOIJS
ERIC SYI{ANSKI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
SAN TRAIICISCO EXAI.I I NER
illsc. suPPLlEs
(
ACCoUItT
65.16 101 65200 130
1,650.00 n1 22516
40.00 620 15000
20.57 101 68020 '160 2200
165.00 320 76110 210
154.27 101 6/1350 210
414.80 lot 65200 201
25,000.00 320 76010 180
12,005.84 618 61520 210
1,012.00 101 64420 orl
190-00 526 69020 190
7 ,570.00 320 W(OO 210
48.98 526 69020 160
328.25 320 79160 120
CITY OT BURLINGAiIE
[/ARRANT REGISTER
04t26/02
VENDOR DETAILf' Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
PAGE 6
AI.{OUNT
65.16
84.00
1 .650.00
40.00
165.00
151.27
414.A0
25,000.00
'12,005.44
1,O12.00
190.00
7,57O.00
48.98
324 -25
22360
22429
?2501
22633
22A12
22814
22857
22895
23366
82581 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE D I STRI BUTORS
GAS, OIL & GREASE
82582
23019
82584 I.IER I T RESOURCE GROUP
TEIIPORARY EI.IPLOYMENT SVC.
23076
82585 THE I.IOB I LE STORAGE GROUP
BLOG. & GROUI]OS MAINT.
23138
82586 CYSERNET COIISULTING, Illc.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23234
82587 23253
82589 THE PRACTICAL SOLUT IOI,IS GROUP
MISCELLA EqJS 750.00 618 61520 038
750.00
(
82574 NOR]HERN TOOL AND EOUIPI.IEi]T
SMALL TOOLS
84.00 101 68010 220 1587
20,57
23367
(
NUI.IBER IIAI.IE
82565
82570
CITY OT BURL I iIGAI.,IE9ARRANT REGISTER
04/26t02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes liand Hritten Checks
70,719.71
2,9A0.44
326 79530 210
5?6 69020 210
PAGE 5
AI.4OUNT
2,315.86
73,700.18
600.00
4,500.00
1n .07
536.54
1 ,001 .52
1?,656.50
12,158.35
57.09
364.57
38.75
ACCOJNT
2,315. a96 20281
82559 SPRINT PCS
UTILITY EXPENSE
82560 ROT'IAN & LOUGEE, INC.
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
82561 REIIEE RAI{SEY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82562 }IICOLAS EECHgAII
OEPOSIT REFU},IDS
PORTOSAII
RENIS & LEASES
20724
20963
21656
21948
2213a
21717
82566 I,'ILBUR SI.IITH ASSOCIATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
21769
82167 BIEB AND ASSOCIATES, rNC.
PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALIZED S
21 3
CINGULAR I,JIRELESS
COI,{I4UN I CAT IONS
82568 V8 colt LLc
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
RECREATIOII PROGRAI.I EXPENSE
82569 AT&T
UIITITY EXPENSE
21253
82563 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC.
FIRE APPARATUS i{AIiIT.
21513
82564
600.00 101 68010 220 1231
4,500.00 731 22520
711.05 625 6521s 203
175.07 t29 68030 180 4200
536,54 101 66100 160
1,001.52 320 80480 210
12,656.50 320 80510 2,10
10,691 ,47
1 ,766.88
529 36716
529 68030 ?13
57.09 896 20281
270.00 101 68010 220 1/,60
361,37 320 71170 110
38.75 101 65200 202
22191
82571 cuMt4rlts-ALLrsoN coRpoRATloll
OFFICE EXPENSE
?2191
ALLAN RIDLEY
COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
82572 AUTO PRIDE CAR I.'ASH
VElTCLE I,IAIIIT.
22278
82573 AllERICAlr EUSr XESS CO,itiUN I CAT r ONS 22339
PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING 2,091.40 101 68010 150 1450
2,O91.40
((
711.05
270.00
CITY OF BIJRLINGAI"IE}IARRAIiT REGISTER
04t26/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Dehotes Hahd Uritten checks
(
ACCOUNT
145.85 320 75110 120
288.00 ',t01 68010 220 13/,7
1 ,194.74 620 15000
450,00 731 22520
18,24 526 69020 171
PAGE 4
42546 ANG }.IEI.ISPAPERS
PUBLICATIONS & AOVERIISING
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S
't09.62
6r.52
101 64200 150
520 80510 210
NUTIBER NAI.{E
a2544
82545
82547
42544
82519
82550
82551
82552
82553
82554
82555
82556
BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
JUDY ROSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PR IOR I TY 1
SUPPLIES
JAflES CACCIA PLUI4BING
DEPOSIT REFU}IDS
BLACK MOUI/TAIX SPRITIG gATER
I,IATER PUNCIASES
BURTON IS TIRE APPARATUS
IIRE APPARATUS MAIIIT.
TIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
EAKERIS CHEI.I.DRY
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S
ERIC GIESEKER
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
BAY AREA BUSTIIESS CARDS INC
OFFICE EXPENSE
AFFI N I TEL Co0'll.'lul/ I cAT IoNS
CO,I}IUN I CAT T ON S
82557 AT&T !/IRELESS
COI,4MUN I CAT IONS
Colt1l'luN I CAT I 0|i S
19047
19067
'19083
19239
19320
19330
19366
19431
19191
19544
20105
20246
20301
AIIIOUNT
288.00
175.14
I ,194.78
450.00
168.21
395.00
158.00
266.83
215.00
2,624,06
120.00
629.81
AMERICAII SOCIETY OT CIVIL ENGII,IE 19821
OUES & SUESCRIPTIOTS
EL CAI,II }IO CHARTER LI}IES INC
UISC. SUPPLIES
50.65
144.51
101 65200 203
625 65213 203
597 .47
32.14
lot 55200 160
736 64571 160
168.00 101 68010 220 't587
266.83 't01 65200 110
'120.00 621 64450 160
82558 CARTER INDUSTR IES INC.
SUPPLIES
20673
336.51 620 15000
336.51
((
116.83
'195.'17
395.00 619 64450 2',t0 5180
215.00 101 66100 240
2,624.06 101 68010 120 1322
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IEUARRANT REGISTER
01t?6/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes HaM f.itten Checks
NUMBER IIAI,4E
82529 DARYL D. JONES, IIIC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82530
ACCOUIIT
225.00 101 65200 220
923.32 526 69020 210
1 ,173,01 621 64450 110
345.00 101 68010 220 1162
179.50 101 65200 203
I.IVP REPAIR SERVICE CO.
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAT IZEO S
DAI/KA OFFICE I}IAGING CO
OTFICE EXPEXSE
8?532 MARK CER}IY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1010'l
'11739
13758
14405
15078
15815
16066
16347
17497
17959
AMOUNT
225.O0
9?3.3?
1,173.01
179.50
862.16
84.00
353,27
52,469.39
1,210.?4
678.00
1,488.38
82531
82533
82531
82540
8?535 JOSEPH L'I tL IAiI }ICCLAIN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
62536 SYDNEY I.IALKOO
STIALL IOOLS
82537 UI CtpAL ATT,|TE ANCE
SUPPLIES
82538 COLORPRINT DIGITAL
SMATL T@LS
82539
BURLINGTON SAFETY LABORATORY
FIRE APPARATUS MAIIIT.
BRII{KI S INC.
BANKING SERVICE FEES
OFFICE EXPENSE
SHAS PI PELINE INC
CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PEIIINSULA PUI{P &
PU}IP EOUI PI4EHT REPAIR
135.75
426.11
101 &250 120
529 68030 't10 4200
81.00 10't 58010 220 1587
56.21 620 66700 130
353,27 620 15000
274.41 526 69020 130
18,144,39
4,325.00
320 n380 220
326 Ac320 220
18450
82541 LA80R READY, rNc,
TEI,IPORARY E|{PLOYI.IENT SVC.
18659
82512 NATURCLEAN
XISC. SUPPLIES
18830
1,210.21 527 66520 230
678.00 526 69020 011
1,488.38 527 66520 120
82543 ACCESS UNIFOR}.IS & EI,{EROIDERY
UNI FORMS A',ID EOU T P'.,IE},IT
18990
2,478.37 101 64420 140
?,478.37
(((
PAGE 3
345.00
56.?4
274.41
16629
CITY OF BURL INCAMEI.'ARRAIIT REGISTER
01/26/02
(
ACCoUIIT
641.50 101 68010 220 1342
PA6E 2
82518 DOROTHY RADYK
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
NUMBER },IAI.iE
82519
82520
82521
8?522
42523
82521
82525
03235
03571
o3764
03961
09072
09125
095 r8
09975
3&.63
-27 .06
142.25
37 .99
1n.69
u.28
67.97
64150
80450
69020
69020
59020
66520
66700
64150
AI.IOUN T
643.50
793,U
109.20
4,626.
127.74
40.38
360.00
470.00
160.00
SKYLINE SUPPLY CO., INC.
OFFICE EXPEIISE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
OFFICE EXPENSE
TRAI}ItIIG EXPENSE
I.I I SCETLAXEOTJS EXPENSE
OFFICE EXPEI,ISE
OFFICE EXPEI,ISE
OFFICE EXPENSE
Toi.tARK SPoRTS, INC.
EOUI P}IE}IT I.iAI IIT.
[/EST GROUP PAYI.IEI,I] CTR.
PROFESSIOITAL & SPECIALIZED S
B.E.I . ELECTRI CAL SUPPLIES
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
I4UT'IE CALEREATIi
CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
109.20 529 68030 200 4500
EURLII.IGATIE REC, DEPT./PEITY CASH
OFFI CE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
8LDG. & GROJ}IDS MAINT,
PROIESSIONAL & SPECTALIZED S
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPT IOIIS
lrIsc. supPLlEs
}IISCELLANEruS
03910
ALLSTAR TIRE EOUIPMENT, INC.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
01938
2.37
11.69
20
8?6
533
1a1
759
215
20
l8
38
00
00
00
99
101
320
s26
526
526
527
620
621
101
10'l
101
't0'l
101
101
320
731
68010
68010
68010
64420
68010
58010
80190
22534
110
220
110
260
290
110
110
t t0
110
120
190
210
220
210
'120
1100
1100
1100
1344
1100
255,04 101 61350 210
10,t8 101 65200 203
350.00 101 68010 220 1460
470,00 618 61520 601
160.00 101 68010 220 1342
82528 LEONA I.IORIARTY
CONTRACTUAL SENVICES
09979
1,680.00 101 6a010 220 1341
I ,680.00
(
VE}IDOR OETAILr*r Denotes tlahd lrritten Checks
(
82526 AEAG . LIABILITY
CLAIiIS PAYI'IENTS
82527 AXA FI TZGERALD
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
255.04
127.71 101 65200 111
CITY OF BURLI}IGAI.IEIJARRAN] REGI STER
04/?6t02
VEI,IOOR DETAILr*r oenotes Hahd L/ritten Checks
?07
229
101 65400 200
619 64460 220 5110
(
accoulT
525.00 5?6 69020 260
266.50 101 64350 120
80,00 101 32100
669.35 10'r 10700
1,793. 620 15000
308,80 101 64120 150
123.94 101 68020 192 2200
1,375.05 896 202A2
2,041,46 101 f6210 226
547.76 619 61460 120 5120
165,00 101 68020 t20 2300
72.53 620 15000
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
525.00
436.00
266.50
80.00
669 .35
1 ,793.86
308.80
123.94
4 ,375 .05
2,041 .46
547 .76
165.00
72,53
40,678.27
82505 }.IAIIHEII EENDER & COI,IPANY, INC.
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
82506
AI,iTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
EOUI PI,4EIIT IIAI },IT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
C ITY OF BURLINGA}IE
I'I I SCELLAiIEOUS
82507 BURL I NGAME RECREATION DEPT.
RECREAT IO},I EXPENSES
82508 GCS L/ESTERT POLIER &
SUPPLIES
82509 DULIN ADVERTISTNG INC.
PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING
82503 * GORDON GOTTSCHE
TRAINIIIG EXPEIISE
EL'ING IRRIGATION PROOUCIS
I.I I SCE!LAXEOUS
!,ATER/TI NAIICE PETTY CASH
iII SCELLA}IEOIJS
GRANITE ROCK COIPANY
STREET RESURFACI NG EXPEI.ISE
K & II OISC(UNT LIGHTING & SUPP
[lsc. suPPLlEs
NATIONIIIDE IIIRE & BRUSH I.IFG.
SUPPLIES
}IUMBER I.IAI,4E
82504
825',t 0
42511
82512
82513
23625
01078
01312
01551
01663
01857
02036
02157
02184
0??61
02645
02872
03002
03054
00
00
82514 MAYI.IE TREE EXPERT CO., IIJC.
ilISC. SUPPLIES
82515
10.23
40,668.04
527 c6520 170
896 20280
82517 PACI F IC BELL
UT I LITY EXPEIISE
03080
2,007.'14 896 20281
2 ,007 .11
((
82516 P. c. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
UTILITY EXPEIISE
04-19-2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
I.JATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
SEIJER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
LIATER FUND
SELIER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMENT SERVICES FUND
INFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGE}ICY FUND
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAMELIARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . 01-02
FUND
101
320
326
327
5?6
527
529
518
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
141,400.82
1 ,334,?45.67
1 ,413.11
1,4',t3.12
59,930.50
3,300.32
58.61
8,991 .14
10,914.66
1,358.51
2?,795.27
81.25
45 ,000.76
15,716.94
410.29
$1 ,646,910 .97
1 ^)5.ooSuo.oo
W)to
VO ID
8 >so
8)* 5Q-l<-
oK-7b
b tsS.)7
HONORABLE I'|AYOR AllD CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11IilcLUSM, AllD./oR CLAIMS NUI|BERED FRO,| 82361 THROUGH 92502 INCLUSM,TOTALING INTHE AMOIJNT OF 51,616,940.97, HAVE BEEN CHECKED I}I DETAIL A}ID APPROVED BY THE PROPEROFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDA}ICE I.'ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI,IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBtt{I TTED.
DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNC I L DATE
((
FINANCE DIRECTOR
(
NIJI,{BER NAI.IE
8?492
82193
82494
82195
8249A
82499
82501
82502
IOTAL
CITY OF BURLINGAME
I"A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
04t 19 /02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
360.00 731 22541
256.29 526 69020 120
PAGE 1O
AMOUNT
360.00
256 -29
2,826.23
100.00
125.00
1,269.10
440.00
1 ,450.00
200.00
315.29
t25.00
$1 ,616,910.97
CATHOLIC SAN FRANCISCO
I'I I SCELLAIIEOUS
THE KUPFERLE FOUNDRY CO.
I'IISC. SUPPLIES
BARTLE UELLS ASSOCIATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
SRIAN GO{ES
CONIRACTUAI SERVICES
8?496 EO TICKEL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82497 BURLINGAI1E HIGH SC}IOOL
CO}IIRACIUAL SERVICES
,113.11
,113.12
326 79530 210
327 78535 210
23614
23615
23616
23617
23618
23619
23620
23622
23623
23621
23625
INN AT IiIORRO BAY
TRAVEI & MEETINGS
KATHLEEN DORE PROPERTIES
RENTS & LEASES
82500 KAI}IY SYilAISKI
I.I I SCELLANECT,'S
100.00 101 68010 220 1581
125.00 101 68010 220 1581
1,269.10 101 6a010 220 1572
440.00 101 55300 250
1,450.00 320 76010 180
200.00 731 22543
315.29 101 64400 250
525.00 526 69020 260
RUB I II HURIN
TRAVEL & I4EETIIIGS
GOROON GOTTSC'IE
TRAINING EXPENSE
(
T Iil RI CHI'IOND
TRAVEL 8I.IEETINGS
t.IICHAEL S]ERII
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
TLC ADI,IIN I STRATORS
PROFESSIO}IAI. & SPECIALIZED S
8218?XAVIER UEBB
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
82483 scAPES, I iic.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82481 TON.I HATLENDORF
I,IISCELLA}IEOUS
824A6 cJ's oELI
iIISC. SUPPLIES
82487 KORALEEII ENTERPRISES
MISCELLA}IEOUS
82488 CHRIS ROGERS
OFFI CE EXPENSE
VE},{DOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes tiend gritten Checks
2291a
(
ACCOU|,tT
70.18 101 68020 250 21oO
667.70 101 64420 121
1,936.00 101 644?0 011
112,00 tot 68010 220 1588
175.00 101 61420 210
75.00 101 68010 220 ,t581
11,875.00 320 80190 220
200.00 101 36500
1,573.15 621 61450 2oO
455.00 101 65200 120
1,244. 526 690?0 233
5',r 9.59 101 64420 110
9,302,52 526 69020 210
619,'14 618 615?0 210
82477 cPs
PERSO}IIIEL EXAiII IIAT IONS
82178 I,4ER I T RESOIJRCE GROUP
TEI,IPORARY EI.4PIOYiIENT SVC.
82479 CRITICAL SOLUTIONS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALTZEO S
82480
CITY OF BUR! INGAI,iEI'ARRANT REGISTER
04/19 /02
PAGE 9
AMOUIIT
667.70
1 ,936.00
24,187.71
112.00
175.00
75.00
11,875.00
200.00
1,241.A6
519 -59
9 ,302.52
649.11
82176
23418
82485 CANOII FINANCIAL SERVICES, IIIC.
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE
23136
23076
23086
23097
23156
23160
23326
23502
23510
23517
82189 ERLER AIIO KALI OT]SKI,IIIC.
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI I ZED S
23531
82190 I'IADELE INE FREDA, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIATIZED S
2353?
(
82491 TIIKE KORDI,IER
TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS
?3613
171.00 101 68010 250 .l,loo 171 .00
(
NUI.IBER i]AtIE
23005
70. 18
1 ,573.15
455.00
21,1A7.71 320 76010 210
(
NU}.IBER IIAME
42461
82462
82463
82161
82165
82166
8?46A
82169
82170
8?171
82472
821n
82474
CITY OF BURLINGAME[/ARRAI'IT REGISTER
04/ 19/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tlBrd ll|.itten Checks
ACCOUNT
2,420,50 619 64460 220 5190
40.00 619 64460 210 5170
20.32 621 &450 160
PAGE 8
At40u T
2,420.50
40.00
110.63
20.32
1,125.00
35.78
&9.95
212,A5
2.100.00
15 ,716.94
12,320.50
150.00
935.00
A & L JA}'/ITORIAL SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PROVIDEi/CE PEST TERI.II TE
PROTESSIO}.IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ARCH L'IRELESS
COI,II.IUN I CAT IONS
COI4I{UN I CATIONS
AT&T
COMI4UN I CAT IONS
}IARGARET I.IO}IROE
TRAVEL & I,IEETINGS
TRAINING EXPENSE
SMELLY MELIS PLUMBI}IG
DEPOSIT RETUIIDS
KATHRYN PAGE ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIAL IZED S
21936
21947
22089
22138
22147
22219
22332
22500
22620
22751
22763
22815
216.44
221,19
't01 65100 160
527 &520 160
425
700
101 64400 2t0
101 61100 261
00
00
Z,A.P. MAI,IUTACTURING
TRAFFIC COITNOL !.IATERIALS
82467 Tot't McGovER
CAPITAL EOUIPI'IE},IT
HACH COMPANY
}IISCELLAIIEOUS
COUI'ITY OT SAN I.IATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I.II LLS PEI{II.iSULA HEALTH SERVICES
PROFESSIOIiAL & SPECIAL IZED S
TRAINIIIG EXPE}ISE
NORTH AI4ERI CAII SPORTS I.IANAGE}IENT 22382
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PARKING COflPA}IY OF AI{ERICA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
669.95 101 65300 800
212.85 526 69020 233
2,100.00 101 68010 220 1585
15,716,91 736 &571 220
12,320,50 101 65200 220
252.OO
85 -00
101 64420 2',t0
101 65200 260
150.00 731 22520
935,00 320 80370 210
82475 JENKII,IS/ATHEIIS INS
CLAII.IS ADJUSTING SERVICES
22851 8,242.00
(
35.78 101 66210 222
(
337.00
8,212,00 61A 64520 225
(
VENDOR DETAI Lr*' Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
8,237.55 320 80370 210
856.00 101 68010 220 1581
392-00 101 68010 220 1588
66.71 101 65200 200
5,126.50 619 61460 210 5120
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE
L'A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
04/ 19t02
433.33
298.13
371-88
172.85
106.80
AIIOUNT
I,237 .55
856.00
392.00
66.71
5 ,126.50
1,401 ,25
I ,382.99
76.17
5,7 .53
211 .32
560.00
11,517.50
390.40
82118 OAHANUKAR BRA}IDES ARCHITECTS 21?58
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
82149 FRAI,I( I.IEEER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
21311
82150 RICX BROr,fl
COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
21499
8?451 clTIcoRP VENDOR t I ilAltCE, INC.
EOUI P},IENT I'IA I IIT.
21521
NUMBER NAI.IE
82153
82451
42455
8?152 SPRIG ELECTRIC
PROTESS IOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
SERVICES,
EOU I P',IEIIT
EOUIPUENT
EOU I PI.IENT
EOUI PI.IEIiI
EOU I PiIEIIT
21574
21613
INC.21634
?1933
DU.ALL SAFETY
TRAINING EXPEI{SE
TRAINING EXPENSE
TRAINING EXPENSE
560.19
120.38
420.38
101 66240 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
ARAI,IARK UII I FORI.I
UXI FORIS AIID
UI{I FOR}IS AND
UNI FORI.iS A}ID
UI.II FORI{S AND
uilt foRfis A D
101
526
5?7
619
620
66240
69020
66520
64460
66700
140
140
140
140
110
21747
82456 TUR80 DATA SYSTEI|S, INC.
11I SCELLANEoJS
21767
82457 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE UEST, I 2I8I9
OTF I CE EXPENSE
CI NGULAR !'IRELESS
cofiiruNIcATIoNS
82458 SAN I.IATEO ICE CHALET
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
EUNICE JEAN gALCIIA
CO},ITRACTUAL SERVICES
76,17 526 69020 160
5,786,53 101 37010
241.32 101 65200 110
560.00 10't 68010 220 1t62
14,517.50 101 57010
21875
82459 sAti itATEo coUNTy Co TROLLERS OFF 21a97
MI SCEITANEOUS
82460
190.40 101 68010 220 1347
(
PAGE 7
NUI.IBER NA},IE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
T/ARRAXT REGISTER
04/ 19/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand ll.itten checks
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
1 ,077 .53
1,861.00
356.00
208.00
56.00
474.00
174.94
2,181-00
44.93
28,716.71
1 ,200.00
2,770.00
114.36
82433
82434 RACOUET SMITII
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82435 IIOLTE & ASSOCIA]ES, INC.
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
82436
4,864.00 10'1 68010 220 1582
335.00 320 79020 210
99.73
398.94
578.86
101 68020 110 2100
101 68010 220 1100
621 61150 200
20216
?0139
20376
20501
20513
20518
?0706
207A3
20938
20954
20946
21009
21110
LYNX TECHNOLOGIES
TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE
TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE
TRAI}IING EXPEIISE
69.34
69.31
69.32
101 66?10 ?60
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
82437 DAN COFFEY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82438 COUNTY OT SAN UATEO
iI I SC. SUPPLIES
82139 I{ICRO ['AREHOUSE
CO}IUUN I CATIONS
82110 IBS BUILDING MATNTENANCE CO.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
82141 K- 119 oF cALIFoRN1A, INC.
BLDG. & GROUNOS I.{AINT.
82112 HARDISON KOMATSU IVELICH &
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
8244t SCIUTII 8AY REGIONAL PUELIC
TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE
42446 outcK tilx coltcREtE
SIDEgALX REPAIR EXPENSE
55.00 101 68010 220 1588
474,00 101 68010 120 1320
174.94 621 64450 160
2,181.00 619 64160 220 5180
11.93 101 6a020 190 2200
28,716.71 320 76010 210
2,770,00 tot 65100 250
625.00 101 68010 120 1690
444.36 101 66210 219
42117 cEB
r,{ I sc. suPpLlEs
21210 85.89 101 64350 120
85.89
((
ACCOUNT
(
GE CAPITAL
OFF ICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY HALL MAINTEIIANCE
625.00
20924
8?443 LAUREITCE S. itOY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82445 AI.IERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA
I.II SC. SUPPL I ES
1,200.00 101 68010 220 1462
82417 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA !'ATER 17764
OUES & SUESCRIPTIONS
NUI.IBER NAME
82418
82419
824?4
824?5
82126
82428
82429
SPINNAKER SAI L ING
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
PARAI{OU TIS GREAT AiIERICA
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
BITL SI.II TII
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DENIIIS J. AiIOROSO
CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES
PRUDENT IAL OVERALL SUPPLY
CO}ITRACTUAT SERVICES
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI.IARRAI{T REGISTER
04 /19/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Nand Hritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
13,706.00 526 69020 210
72.00 101 68010 220 1462
101 64010 120 1322
101 64010 220 12',t2
1,255,668.00
76010 220
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
13,706.00
72.00
5,'t40.00
678.00
75.00
'133.88
108.75
116.82
624 .17
460 -00
540.00
1778r'-
18078
1A?75
1a659
14746
18963
14970
19027
19044
19333
19366
19564
8?421 LA80R READY. IilC.
TEIIIPORARY EI'IPLOYMENT SVC.
280.00 101 68010 220 1588
678.00 526 69020 011
180.00 101 68010 220 1231
75,00 't01 68010 220 158',1
133.88 101 65200 220
108.75 101 68010 220 1461
'116.82 101 54100 110
621.17 101 65200 203
460.00 619 64160 210 5200
540.00 320 80190 210
2,?22.56 101 66210 21O
320
PEGGY GUARALDI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82427 SAN MAIEO COIJNTY TIMES
OFFICE EXPENSE
BURTON IS TIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MATIIT.
BAKERIS CHEM-DRY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
PO!]ER WASHIIIG SERVICE
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S
19431
82430 JOHN CAHALAII, ASLA
PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALIZED S
19561
42431
(
82132 DELTA SAFETY SUPPLY CO
I.' I SC. SUPPL IES
198?7
158,69 527 66s20 120
158.59
(
290.00
4,850.00
280.00
480.00
82420 MICHAEL ADAI'I
COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
424?2 LYNI'IE FIRESTONE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,255,668.000
(
NUiIBER NAI4E
82101
82102
82401
82406
42407
82109
42410
82111
82112
8?413
82414
82115
CITY OF BI,JRLI}IGAMEIJARRAIIT REGISTER
04t19t02
VEHDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hard Uritten Checks
PAGE 4
Al,l0Ul,lT
1,458.00
100.00
1 ,336.60
't68.00
801.00
699.21
1 ,200.00
116.00
144.38
10,913.03
10.63
1,241.61
199.18
57.52
SUZETTE TOLI TSO}I
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
82403 DEI,JEY PEST COI'ITROL
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIATIZEO S
CllRtS licCoY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
UNITED TRAIISI'II SSIOIl INC.
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
PENI}ISULA SPORTS OFTICIALS
COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
L INHART PETERSEiI POI.IERS ASSOC.
I,4ISCELLANEOUS
EROADI.'AY BUSINESS
IlI SCELLAIIEOUS
STATE OF CALI FOR}I IA
SUPPLIES
COLORPRINT OIGITAL
I.{ I SC. SUPPLIES
ACCOIJ T
1t2.00 101 68010 220 1588
1,458.00 101 68010 150 1451
100.00 101 66210 210
1,336.60 101 65200 203
168.00 101 68010 220 1588
80't.00 101 68010 220 1587
699.24 527 66520 230
1,200.00 101 68010 220 1581
336.00 '!01 68010 220 1s88
111.38 l0'l 56210 210
10,913.03 731 22515
40.63 731 22555
1 ,244.61 620 15000
199.18 101 64100 120
57.s2 625 65213 203
IELEKEY SCADA SYSTETIS IIIC.
PUII1P EOUIPMENT REPAIR
82108 ACTION SPORTS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
IIAROTD FIELDS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COT.IMUIII TY GATEPATH
PROTESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
11218
14?94
14338
11760
15529
15711
16085
16167
16138
16575
16599
16449
16919
17497
17546H I -TECH EI.IERGEiJCY VEHICLE
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAI IIT.
82416 PIONEER RAI/DUSTRIAL
BLDG. & GRq,JNDS I.IAI NT.
17547
792.00 101 68020 190 2200
792.00
((
1 12.00
82405 Ttlt oLEl,to
COXIRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY OF BURLIIIGAi4E9ARRANT REG I STER
04/ 19 t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks
09670
097?0
09790
11361
11571
13940
11007
191.29
198.95
152,14
325.13
181.56
11 .33
't37,72
32.16
26.15
191.81
'101
'10'l
101
526
526
526
527
529
529
619
101
101
320
526
527
68020
68020
68020
69020
69020
69020
66520
68030
68030
64460
(
120
130
190
120
130
233
120
1?0
130
120
2200
2200
4200
4200
5120
ACCOUNT
120 2200
222
120
260
260
A}.{OUNT
I ,751.91
375.87
3, '188. 19
38.07
1 ,036.00
23.73
106.77
519. 00
410.29
2.381.50
iJUMBER NAME
42391
82392
82193
42395
82396
82399
ORCIIARD SUPPLY HARDI'ARE
UISC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
sl,lAt L T00Ls
IIISCELLA}IEOUS
MISC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI4ALL TOOLS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
SEOUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL
OFFI CE EXPENSE
THE ADAM-HILL COMPAI/Y
FIRE APPARATUS MAI NT.
SCH}'AAB, INC.
OFT ICE EXPENSE
AT&T
UTILITY EXPEIISE
ELECTRO.I'IOTION I NCORPORATED
PUI4P EOUIPI.IENT REPAIR
PUMP EOUI PI,IE}IT REPAIR
375.87 101 64250 110
IIITERSTATE TRAFFIC
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC CONTROL IIATERIALS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
TRAII,IIIIG EXPENSE
TNAINING EXPENSE
178.61
2,548,75
341 .E
90-93
2a -15
68020
6r210
80240
69020
66520
EI4PLOYMENT DEVELOPI.IENT DEPARTMEN 10567
I.IISCELLAIIEOUS
82394 LEE STA}IBOLIS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11684
82397 cfil4AtR itEcHANtcAL SERVTCES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
11773
82398
38.07 101 57500 017
'1.056.00 101 58010 220 1588
23.75 625 65213 203
106.77 101 64250 110
319.00 619 61160 210 5110
110.29 896 20281
526 690
5?7 665
23
21
20
20
1 ,190.75
1,190.75
0
0
82400 INVENSYS I'IETERING SYSTEI.IS
CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT
14114
10,025.23 526 69020 E00
10,025.23
(
PAGE 3
(
82390
NUI4EER llAl'lE
82375 DO}.I PI.AGIIANN
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
82376 PUTNAM EUICK PONTIAC GI.IC
VEHICTE I.IA I NT.
82377
VENOOR OETAIL!*r oenotes Hand llritten Checks
0317?
(
ACCOUNT
493.00 101 68010 220 1581
6,512.50 101 55200 250
13,334.81 731 22562
1,321.57 101 68010 250 1100
640,00 5?6 69020 233
115.00 526 69020 160
998.68 101 64250 220
2,200.00 101 61250 110
773.25 to'l 68010 220 ,t344
210.00 621 64450 ?00
9,921,44 101 65.100 201
1,941.35 320 71171 210
857.55 10'l 66100 210
CITY OF BURLITIGAMEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
01/ 19102
PAGE 2
AMOUI/T
193.00
10.54
6,512.50
13,331.84
1 ,321 .57
640.00
11.5.00
998.68
2,200.00
773.25
210. 00
9 ,921 .11
1 ,94',t .35
857 .35
559.36
01518
82380 SEAUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
I.I I SCE L LAiIE OUS
03536
82381 PACIFIC I'EST SECURITY, INC.
cotluuN I cATtoNS
0360't
82382 STATECO}ITROLLER
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
03666
03821
8?384
CITY OF SAN iIATEO
TRAVEL & I{EETIXGS
SA}I I,4ATEO U}T IO}I HtGH
SCH@L DEVELOPI.IEIIT FEE
RANDY SCHIJARTZ
TRAVEL & }IEET INGS
JEAN BUCKS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
03206
03366
0347142378
8?379
09019
82385 cotT/0'coltltoR
CITY IIALL I'IAINTENANCE
0913?
82386 oLYMPrAil OtL co!.tPAllY
GAS, OIL & GREASE
09238
82387 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
09461
82388 ocE '.BRU} |,tG, INC.
PRoFESSIo AL & SPECIATTZEO S
09193
82389 09543RON HOULE
TRAINIIIG EXPEiISE
((
10.54 101 65200 202
82383 U S POSTAL SERVTCE
OFFICE EXPETISE
559.36 101 55200 260
CITY 0F BURLINGAI'IE
I,JARRANT REGISTER
04t19/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
NUI{EER NAME
82361 ALPIiIE AWARDS, INC.
I.II SC. SUPPL IES
BAYSHORE INTERNATIOiIAL TRUCKS
FIRE APPARATUS I4AINT.
82363
ACCOUNT
430.29 101 58010 120 1581
21.81 101 65200 203
150.95 10'l 68020 260 2300
20,002.26 731 22563
01052
01236
01400
01500
0?149
02157
02160
02261
02645
02a72
02880
02898
59.75
16.60
17.10
AMOUNT
130.29
21 .81
'150.95
20,002.26
20,234.00
720.00
103.43
93.45
1,662.19
123.26
4,800.00
20,398.90
411.39
82362
82364
82365
82367
82366
82369
82370
82371
82372
82373
BRENIOI{ SATETY, INC.
TRAINIIIG EXPEI,ISE
BURLI}IGAME ELEI,I- SCHML DISI,
SCHOOL DEVELOPI'IENT FEE
CITY OF REDI.IOOD CITY
COMI,4IJN I CAT IONS
CITY HALL I'IAI }ITEIIANCE
EIJING IRRIGATTO}I PRODUCTS
I,I I SCELLANEOUS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
r,4l sc, suPPLtEs
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
400.00
19,83/r.00
621 61150 160
621 61150 220
720.OO 101 64010 220 't312
103.43 101 68020 192 2200
10'1 68020 120 2'100
320 75110 't 20
620 66700 120
GRANITE ROCK COI,IPANY
STREET RESURFACING EXPE}ISE
K & I.I OISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I,{AYNE TREE EXPERT CO., INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
US fILTER
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.4I SCELLANEOUS
1,662.19 101 66210 226
123.26 101 66210 120
4,800.00 101 68020 220 2300
16,993.29
3,405.61
526 69020 120
526 69020 233
HI LLBRAE LUI,IBER CO.
SI.{ALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROUIIDS IIAINT.
SIDEIIALK REPAIR EXPENSE
I.' I SC. SUPPLIES
101 66210 130
101 68020 190
101 66210 219
,26 69020 120
2200
4.84
94.32
180.50
131 .73
8?371 KPI.IG LLP
MISCELLAIIEOUS
03109
30,000.00 101 15100
30.000.00
(
82366 GENE EVAiIS
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
((
01862
PAGE I
((
04- 12-200?
NAiIE
TOTAL FOR APPROVAT
CITY OF BURL I }IGAI4E9ARRAIIT REGTSTER
TUND RECAP . 01-02
PACE 10
AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND
CAPIIAL II.IPROVEI.iE}ITS FUIID
LiATER CAPITAL PROJECT TUND
SEI.,ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
IIATER FUND
SE!JER FUNO
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF IiISURA}ICE TU}ID
FACI LIT I ES SERVICES FU}ID
EOUI P}IE},IT SERVICES FU}ID
INFORMATION SERVICES FUiID
FIRE IIECHAIIIC SENVICES fUIID
TRUST AND AGENCY FUIID
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
56,599,67
'100,058.84
23,765.30
67 ,3U.08
6,951 .43
21,519.95
2,619.68
5,086.48
2,419,32
11 ,701 .72
4n.59
17.62
17,375.36
5,675.51
FUIIO
101
320
326
327
526
527
529
6't8
619
620
621
525
731
896
$324,652.65
HONORABLE TIAYOR AIO CITY COUI,ICIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY TIIAT THE CLAII,IS LISTED ON PAGES NUMEERED FROM 1 THROUGII 10INCLUSM, AilD/OR CIATMS NUUBERED FROfi 82238 TXROUGH 82360 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING INTHE AMOUNT OT 5324,652,65, HAVE BEEN CIIECKED IN DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY TI{E PROPEROFFICIALS, ANO III I.IY OPIIIION REPRESENT FAIR A}ID JUST CBANGES AGAIIST THE CITY I}I
ACCORDAIICE i.IITH TIIETR RESPECTIVE AI.IOIJNTS AS INDICATED THEREOII.
RESPECTFULLY SUBI,!ITTED,
FINANCE DIRECIOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEIIT
OATE
DATE
(
COUNCI L
((
NUI,48ER
82355
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEIt'ARRANT REGISTER
04/12/02
NAIIE VENOORrrr Denotes fiord tJritten Checks
HAYAT CAR RENTAL SYSTE',IS IiIC. 23607
BUSIXESS LICENSE REIU}IO
82356 ROEERT ROSELLI
II I SCE L LAN ECIJS
23608
82357 coREY SIXON
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
?3609
82358 JEFF SCHI'ARTZ
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23610
82359 lto.tAsrER-cARR SUppLy co.
I,I I SC. SUPPLTES
23611
82360 CAL I FORNIA EiIS ACADEI{Y
TRAINI}IG EXPENSE
23612
TOTAL
DETAIL ACCoUIIT
500.00 101 30700
260.00 101 16620
56.00 101 68010 220 1587
28.00 101 68010 220 1587
334.25 619 64460 120 5,t80
190.00 101 65200 260
PAGE 9
Al,40uIT
500.00
260.00
56.00
28.00
334.25
190.00
$321,652.65
(
CITY OF EURLINGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER
04t12/02
VE}IDOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes HaM ttritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
992.36 526 69020 233
800.00 320 80200 2't0
197.24 101 66210 250
400.00 101 66210 250
2,743.02 320 75170 220
1,9?2.98 731 22522
1,610.00 101 65100 260
1,610.00 101 65100 260
t00.00 731 22525
500.00 731 22525
323.67 101 64420 250
341.97 101 65150 140
PAGE 8
NUiIBER }IAME
82339
82310
82341
82312
82343
42344
82345
82346
82347
82318
8?349
82350
82351
82352
CRESCo EoUIP EilT REI{TALS 23170
}I I SC. SUPPL IES
STREET RESURFACIIIG EXPEXSE
102.31
36.62
101 66.210 120
101 66210 226
KORALEE}I EIITERPRISES
I.i I SCELLA}IEOUS
AI,IOI.INT
134.96
992.36
500.00
800.00
400,00
2,743.02
1 ,922.98
1,610.00
1,610.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
323.67
381 .97
JANICE TJOL TE
I.I I SCELLAI,IEOI,,S
OLD REPUBLIC TITLE
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
SEAPORT I.IAR I NA IIOTEL
TRAVEL & }IEETINGS
TRACo 2002
TRAVEL & I.IEETI}IGS
EASTI.IAN KODAK CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
sB!,ttA
IIlISCELLANEOUS
JULIE DAVIS
TRAIIIING EXPEI.ISE
BRIAN GATES
TRAINING EXPEIISE
GARY }I ICHOLS
}IISCELLANECTJS
JII{ gAND
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
BART GAUL
III SCELLANEOUS
FRANKLIN COVEY
TRAVEL & IEEIII.IGS
23510
23516
21579
23595
23596
23597
23599
23600
23601
23602
23603
23604
23605
82351 BPO CONSTRUCTION
IIISCELLA}IEOUS
23606 310.00 731 22546
310.00
(
500,00 731 22543
500.00 731 ?2525
(
497.28
25598
82353 EATTERY U}IIVERSE
UNI TORI.IS IND EOUIPI{ENT
82323 MUSSOI
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
StLVERADO AVI0t{tCS
RAD IO I,iAINT.
J.t4, RIDG!/AY C0.
CAPITAL EOUIPT.IENT
ERIC SYI.IA}ISKI
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
ROGER AIIDREY
TRAINING EXPENSE
ING LEGALS
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
LI BERTY INDUSTRIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
82528 VERIZoN UTRELESS
co fluN I cAT I O[ S
STOFFEL SEALS CORPORAT IOII
UII I FORI.IS AI{D EOUIP}IE}IT
CIIRIS I,II LANO
COIITRACTUAT SERVICES
PENII{SULA UNI FORI.I & EAUIPME}IT
I'IISCELLAIEOUS
(
ACCOUNT
218.44 101 65200 260
245,55 101 65200 205
340.00 529 68010 800 4200
28.00 101 68010 220 1587
106-35 527 665?0 120
104.73 101 68020 160 2300
487.80 101 55150 140
575.00 101 68010 220 1581
627-75 61A 64520 60t
L13-aA 10'1 64200 150
(
CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IEI./ARRANT REGISTER
04t12t02
VENDOR DETAIL!*' Denotes Hand lJritten Checks
PAGE 7
NU}IBER }IAI4E
82324
82325
82326
82327
82329
82330
82331
8?332
82333
82331
82335
PI]NEY BOIIES
OFIICE EXPENSE
COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
AT&T HIRELESS
cofiiruN I cAT t 0|l s
TIIE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
TRAIilIIIG EXPENSE
94
00
101 65'100 110
'i01 65100 220
22270
22286
?2115
22429
22512
22593
22625
22769
22899
?2985
230?1
23128
69
290
A}.{OUNT
245,55
340.00
28.00
106.35
487.80
627 .75
620.00
/./.3.88
359.94
49.00
3,521 .80
2,000.00
23169
a2336 t{ovA PARTNERS, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZEO S
23?36
82337
49.00 101 55200 '!60
3,521.80 320 7s'l',t' 210
2,000.00 101 61420 262
82338 lBlrt coRPoRArtoN
EOUIPI.IEIIT T{AINT.
23125 236.55 101 65300 200
236.55
620.00 tot 65100 260
(
218.44
104,73
575.00
?3367
CITY OF EURL I I,IGAT.IE
!,ANRA T REGISTER
04/12/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand U.itten Checks
PAGE 6
500 -00
23,765,30
7,966.12
275 .00
I ,?17 .04
290,25
192,00
454.51
1,000.00
413.11
636.12
851 .32
8?307 CATHERIIIE J,I.i. }IILI.IEYER
iIISCELLANEqJS
NUI.IBER NAI.IE
82308
82309
82319
82320
aB21
82310 ESA E IIV I ROI,II.,IEN TAL SCIENCE ASSOC
DEPOSIT RETUND
21160
8?311 TILTERFRESH COFFEE EXCELLEXCE
COMI'IUN I CATIONS
21523
82312 ORLANDI TRAI LER, INC.
CAPITAL EOUIPI,IENT
21667
82313 TRACY SIRI
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
21685
82314 cflRtssY HoLl'{Es
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
21723
82315 DARRYL STELL!]AY
SUPPLIES
21766
82316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE IIEST, I 21819
MISCELLANEOUS
82317 I{ANDEGO, INC.
t.II SC. SUPPLIES
21855
82318 21948
JASON GILI{ORE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ROMAN & LOUGEE, IIIC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
VB GOLT LLC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GI'IAC PAYI.IENT PROCESSING CENTER
CAPITAL EOU I PI,IENT
OFFICER ROBERT BOLL
TRAIXING EXPENSE
AMERICAN VAN EOUIPI{ENT I}IC.
SI4ALL TOOLS
ACCOUNT
500.00 731 22525
200.00 101 68,010 220 ,346
23,765,30 326 79530 210
7,96.12 731 ?2590
275.OO 621 &450 160
1,247.04 529 68030 8oo 4200
290.25 101 68010 220 '1345
192.00 101 68010 220 1312
55.00 620 15000
751.A1 101 64400 115
154.54 tot 58010 120 lt89
1,000.00 529 68,030 220
u3.44 101 66't00 800
636,12 101 65100 260
851.32 619 64160 130
20801
20926
20963
22006
22023
22031
82322 ARCH !'IRELESS
co}fl,tuN I cAT t 0!t s
22089 10.80 101 58020 160 2200
10.80
(((
AI4OUN]
200.00
55.00
751.81
CITY OF BURLINGAT.iEL'ARRANT REC I STER
04t 12t02
VEIIDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand ltritten Checks
101 64200 150
320 80510 210
619 64460 210
320 80410 220
621 6t1450 160
PAGE 5
AMOUNI
208.00
260.71
678.00
4,233.0?
122.10
3,375.00
56.00
/.,036.00
250.00
65,720.05
22,002.ao
315.01
}IU}IBER NAI,4E
42292
82293
82294
42295
a2296
82297
82298
82299
82300
82301
82302
82303
a2304
82305
GEORGE MASTALIR
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
CRANE PES] CONTROL
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALTZED S
TO}IY I S UPIIOLSIERY
SUPPLIES
LABOR READY, INC.
TEI.IPORARY EI.IPLOYMENT SVC.
DEAN'S AUTO BODY &
I.{ I SCELLANE(r,'S
LIEEERT CASSIDY IdH I TI'IORE
TRAIIIIIIG EXPENSE
ERIC GIESEKER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
POL'ER LIASI'I I NG SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
ALL FEilCE gOlPAltY, INC.
8LDG. & GRdjNDS I.IAIIIT.
CREATIVE II{TERCONNECT
COI.IMUN I CAT I ON S
AFFI!IIIEL COIiIUII I CAT I O}I S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CO6iI.IUN I CATIONS
PACI FIC GAS & ELECTRIC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
C,H.8ULL COT,IPAIIY
S}IALL T@LS
18088
18105
18173
18659
18795
19083
19095
19191
19564
19710
19768
20216
20335
20459
109.62
131 .04
181.44
ACC0U T
208.00 101 68010 220 1589
102.00 619 64160 210 5110
260.71 620 '.t5000
4,233.02 518 64520 604
AI,IG NEUSPAPERS
PUBLICATIO}IS & ADVERTISING
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S
PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
3,375.00 101 61120 262
56.00 101 58010 220 1587
/r,036.00 101 66210 210
250.00 527 66520 190
228.36 101 65200 160
65,620.05
100.00
22,002.A0 320 75110 220
115 - 0r 619 61460 130
82306 PHIL SCOTT
TRAVEL & UEETINGS
20550 572.43 527 66520 250
572.43
((
678.00 526 69020 011
(
102.00
?28.36
r,{IKE S ITli
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82286 CINTAS CoRP. #464
UNI FORiIS AND EOUIPI,4ENI
82287 GOLDEN NURSERY
t.II SC. SUPPLIES
a2?88 ETRo IO8ILE CO ]|U], CATIO S
EOUIPMEIIT IIAI }IT.
822A2 VALLEY OIL CO.
SUPPLIES
I{ D LINEN SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JOSEPII UI LL IA}I MCCLAI}I
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
COLORPRINT DIGITAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
(
ACCOUNT
1,001.31 101 68020 120 2200
2,665.00 525 69020 210
789.00 101 65'150 200
3,288.41 101 65100 220
9,176.51 620 15000
109,66 101 65200 220
56.00 101 68010 220 1587
234.00 101 68010 220 1589
640.90 101 6aO20 110 2200
95.61 320 78/.90 120
570.43 101 65150 200
CITY OF BURLINGAMEUARNANT REGI STER
01t 12t02
VEI,IDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes H.nd [r.itten Checks
PAGE 4
82277 ROMEO PACKITG CO
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.IVP REPAIR SERVICE CO.
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAT IZED S
82?79 ARC ELECTRIC
EOUI PiIEIIT I,4AI }IT.
82280 ALL CITY }IANAGE}.IE}IT
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
}IUI,48ER NAIIE
87278
82281
8?283
822A4
82285
82289
1 1348
11739
13613
15595
15739
15764
15827
16066
16637
16911
17128
17102
17497
17534
AMOUIIT
1 ,001 .31
2,665.00
789.00
3,248.44
111.95
9,476.54
109.66
56.00
234.00
640.90
95.61
570.13
583.08
2,1r9.07
146.14
8.55
187.67
102.59
101 68020 200 2200
527 &520 120
620 15000
621 61150 110
111,71
471.37
101 66210 110
527 66520 120
2,159.07 320 80510 220
8??91 CE}ITRAL EUSINESS EOUIPMENT
EOUIPI4ENT I,IAINT.
18011 680.89 101 65150 200
680.89
((
I,{I LLERAE LOCK SIIOP
EOUIP!{ENT IlAI }IT.
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPE}iSE
42290 PENI}.ISULA DIGTTAL I I{AG I }IG
COITRACTUAL SERVICES
NUMEER NAI.{E
82263
82274
82275
LYIIGSO GARDEII I.IATER IALS
iII SC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
iII SC. SUPPLIES
CAL-STEA}I
MISC. SUPPLIES
utsc. suPPLlEs
DOROTHY OI GRADY
i,II SC. SUPPLIES
t'IISC. SUPPLIES
358.00 101 67500 037
116.11
549.85
101 66210 120
527 66520 120
194.85
129.90
526 69020 120
527 66520 120
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
4A5.63
17,751.00
367.00
96.50
?01 ,97
359.45
267 .92
107.17
85.00
665.99
321.75
CITY OF BURLINGAME
UARRANT REGISTER
04t12t02
VENDOR DETAILt*t Denotes Hand tlritten checks
82?64 !,ALTER GRENN
CO}iTRACTUAL SERVICES
42265 CITY OT MILTBRAE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42266 AI'IERICA}I PLANNING ASSOCIATION
DUES & SUESCRIPT IOIIS
82267
42269 SEOIEIA U}IION HIGH SCI{OOL
OFFICE EXPENSE
82270 I}ITERSTATE TRAFFIC
UN I FORI{S AND EOUIP}IENT
82271 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPI|ICS
}I I SC. SUPPL IES
82272 ALERT D00R SERVICE, INC,
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
82273
485.63 101 68010 220 1341
17,754"00 101 65200 220
367.00 101 64400 240
95.50 618 64520 604
548.83
259.80
268.83
10't 58020 120
320 78490 1?0
526 69020 120
77 .26 tot 68020 190 2300
't0t 68020 200 2200
ACCOUNT
267.92 101 65400 140
107.17 101 66100 120
85.00 619 64460 120 51aO
09143
09147
09231
09102
09518
09560
o9720
09790
09990
10059
10557
11020
?200
AEAG . L IABI LITY
TIISCELLANEOUS
82268 SAN I.IATEO LATJN I,{O!'ER SIIOP
BLDG. & CRCIJIIDS ,,AINT.
EOUIP}IENT I.IAI }IT.
E}IPLOYI'IENT DEVELOPI.IEIJT DEPARI}IE}I 10567
IISCELLATEOUS
82276 IiEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
11101 117,36 320 79020 210
117.36
((
359.45 ',101 65100 110
(
I ,077.46
358.00
CITY OT BURLIIIGAIiEIIARRAIIT REGISTER
04/12t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
PAGE 2
028'19
82252 I4AYXE TREE EXPERT CO., INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
02872
82253
KAVANAGH EIIGINEERI I,IG
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZEO S
r,rAll P0!,ER
TEiIPORARY EMPLOYTIENT SVC.
I.IOTOROLA INC.
SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
1,800.00 320 80190 210
115.20 1o',t 65300 011
82.50 327 78534 210
173.03 620 15000
NUMEER HA}iE
82?50
82251
42254
42256
82257
82258
8?259
82260
82261
02665
02914
03041
03054
03080
03106
03158
03536
03910
03964
394.24
-44,11
I ,376.00
22.51
129.21
'1,500.00
AI.IOIJNT
1 .800.00
115.20
82.50
I8.03
1 ,362.74
81.77
5,675.61
104.89
80.00
710 - 00
3,377.89
365.09
PACIFIC NURSERIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
ii|ISCELLAIIEOUS
320 78/90 120
529 68030 120 /.200
731 22560
98r.78
32.61
344.32
82215 P. c. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
PACI FIC BELL
U]ILITY EXPENSE
PATTERSON PARTS, INC
SUPPLIES
STEPHEN J. PICCXI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SEOUOIA A}IALYTICAL LABS
}II SCELLANEOUS
BURLINGAI.IE REC. DEPT../PETTY CASH
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
8LDG. & GROUNDS I{AINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
lllscELLAliE0us
MI SCELLANEOUS
u.77 101 66240 170
5,675.61 896 20241
101.89 6?0 15000
80-00 '101 6a010 220 1572
730,00 526 69020 233
IJEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR.
}IISC. SUPPLIES 365.09 l0l 643t0 120
82262 STATE OT CAICONSERVAT ION OEPT
iIISCELLANEOTJS
09073
2,801.94 731 22550
2,AO1,94
(((
101 68010 120 1570
101 68020 190 2200
101 68010 220 1347
520 80140 210
618 64520 604
731 22543
NUI4BER I,IAME
82238 GRAY'S PAIIIT, BURLINGAi.IE 01025
TRAFTIC CONTROL MATENIALS
MISC. SUPPLIES
82?39 0't3'13
(
HANBOR SAND & GRAVEL
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
BURL INGA}IE AUTO SUPPLY
GAS, OIL & GREASE
VEHICLE }.,IAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS I,4AINT.
EOUIPI'IENT MAINT.
MISC. SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
TRAIN ING EXPENSE
T IRE APPARATUS MAINT.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
lIARRANT REGISTER
04/12/02
VENDOR DETAILr"' Denotes Hand [rritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
242.05 ',lot 56210 120
67 ,301 ,5A
8,680.61
9,006.86
4,436.2A
327 79180 z't0
527 66130 190
527 66530 210
527 66530 800
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
113-26
212.05
1 ,073.70
343 -35
312.13
496.88
1,770.16
a9,4?5,33
98.85
I ,357 .46
a.61
131.62
101 &210 222
619 61160 120
82240
8??11 01676
01857
02014
02017
02110
02157
02625
101
101
101
526
527
620
620
625
65200
65200
65200
69020
(6520
't5000
66700
6s213
201
202
203
200
120
260
203
54,16
117.79
44.95
64.93
7 .75
724.65
41 .5s
17.62
EURLINGAI'IE STATIONERS
OTFICE EXPENSE
8??12 GCS TIESTERII POIIER &
SUPPLI ES
82213 I.'ACEK DENNAqJI
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
82214 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
EOUIPI.IEI,IT iIAINT.
8224s US FI LTER OPERATING SERVICES
PROTESSIONAL & SqECIALIZED S
BLDG. & GROU}IDS I{AINT.
PROFESSTOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT
82?46 EUI}IG IRRIGATION PROOUCTS
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
82247 Li.l', cRAINGER, tNC.
EOUIPIIE}IT I.IAINT.
A2248 IIO!]ARD JOI.JES BAIIERIES. INC.
SUPPL IES
312.43 520 15000
496,88 101 68010 220 1341
1,770.16 101 65150 200
98.85 101 68020 192 2200
1 ,357.45 126 69020 200
385.25 620 15000
A2249 K & I.I DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
I,4I SC. SUPPL IES
02645 11s.68 619 61160 120 5140
415.68
(
01507
3A5,25
ozua
343.35 ',101 56100 ll0
r
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE s l20l02
TO: IIONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BY
DArE: May 13,2002
APPROVED
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager BY
650-558-7222
sTIBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Agreement Regarding On-CaII Cleanups
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution authorizing amendment to the franchise agreement.
BACKGROUI\ID: In February 2001, BFI, as part ofthe proposed changes to the uniform refuse collection
franchise agreement, eliminarted two scheduled cleanups in the spring and fall and replaced them with two on-
call cleanups.
The program was expected to benefit residents by allowing them the ease of scheduling cleanups at their
convenience. BFI expected that it would be easier to glean recyclables from an on-call prograrn, since they
would not be preoccupied with the massive task of removing the cleanup debris from the entire city on the
same day.
The trial project has proved successfirl; staffrecommends that the franchise agreement be amended to reflect
the new on-call procedure
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Amendment to Agreement
l'
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH
BROWNING,FERRTS INDUSTRTES (BFI) FOR
SOLID WASTE, RECYCLABLE MATERIALS, AND PLANT MATERIALS
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the current franchise agreement with BFI provides that BFI is to provide
certain special collections; and
WHEREAS, the City and BFI agreed to test a system of on-call special collection twice a
year, rather than two service area-wide special collections; and
WHEREAS, the on-call special collection service has proven successful and should be
continued; and
WHEREAS, amendment of the franchise agreement to establish this service would benefit
the City and the community,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The Mayor is authorized and requested to execute the First Amendment to the Franchise
Agreement between the City and BFI as contained in Exhibit A hereto.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Mayor.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
-day
of
-2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COI-INCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 13,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
7:,rD-u-e
5t20to2
)
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN
APPLICATION AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
IMPROVEMENTS AND RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING AND DEDICATING THE SEWER SYSTEM USE
CHARGES TO REPAYMENT OF THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOANS - WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 9948
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the following resolutions for a State
Revolving Fund loan application for Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements, City project No. 9948:
o resolution authorizing the City Manager to file an applicationo resolution identiffing and dedicating revenue
BACKGROUND: The State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Clean Water provides low interest
State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans for wastewater treatment plant improvements. City staffthough U.S. Filter,
our treatment plant operator, have contracted with Carollo Engineers to design reliability and operational
improvements. The total cost is estimated to be $11.4 Million, including all design and construction
administration. Improvements include:
o New sludge dewatering building and equipmento New electrical buildingo Headworks building equipment upgradeo Replacement vacuum truck unloading facility. Equipment upgrade to the aeration basins and facilitieso New in-plant pump station modificationso Supervisory and control system upgrades within the Treatment Plant and to the Rollins Road lift
stationo Miscellaneous equipmentreplacements
Water Resources Board staff have approved the eligibility of a significant portion of our improvements for an
SRF loan. The estimated loan eligibility is $10.2 Million based on the actual accepted tow biA received. Staff
and its financing advisor have reviewed the estimated bond rates compared to the SRF loan rate. The SRF loan
provides a significant savings to the City.
The attached resolutions provide authorizations that are necessary to complete the loan application. Staff expects
approval of the loan in August with the two year construction project starting in late summer.
EXHIBITS: Resolutions
'l
Page2
BUDGET IMPACT: Loan proceeds are expected to finance all project-related costs over the two year
construction period. The City is required to begin paying back the loan within one year of project completion.
This expenditure has been included in the long-term sewer financial plan and will be funded through increases
in sewer rates.
Asst. Public Works Director
6s0-558-7230
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Repons\948SRFloan-Rev and Sign Res.SR.wpd
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OT' THE CITY COT]NCIL OT' TIIE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE STATE REVOLVING FTJTID LOAI\I APPLICATION AND
ACCOMPAI\YING DOCT'MENTS FOR
THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAI\TT IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 9948
RESOLVED, bythe City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame wishes to apply to State Water Resources Control Board for
financial assistance for the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvement Project, City Project No.
9948; and
WHEREAS, the State requires that the City adopt a resolution authorizing this application,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS ORDERED:
1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file, for an on behalf of the
City of Burlingame, a Financial Assistance Application for a loan from the State Water Resources Control
Board in an amount of $10,159,000 for the planning, design, and construction of the City's Wastewater
Treatment Facility Improvement Project.
2. The City Manager or the Manager's designee is fi.rther authorized and directed to certifii that
the City of Burlingame has and will comply with all applicable State and Federal statutory and regulatory
requirements related to any Federal and State loans received.
3. The City Manager or the Manager's designee is further authorized and directed to certiSr that
the City of Burlingame has and will comply with all applicable State and Federal statutory and regulatory
requirements related to any Federal and State loans received.
4. The City Manager is further authorized to negotiate and execute a loan/grant contract and any
amendments or change orders thereto and execute such additional documents as may be necessary for the
loan application.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of _,
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME IDENTIT"TING AND DEDICATING THE SEWER
SYSTEM USE CHARGES TO REPAYMENT OF THE STATE REVOLYING FUND
LOAI\S PURSUAIIT TO THE TERMS OF TIIE LOAII AGREEMENTS AS REQUIRJD
BY 33 U.S.C. $ 1383
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the provisions of 33 United States Code (U.S.C.) section 1383 require that
State Revolving Fund loans made pursuant to the Clean Water Act provide that recipient agencies
dedicate a source of revenue to the repayment of the loan; and
WHEREAS, the sewer service charges paid by the City's ratepayers will be the source of
revenue from which any loans from the State Revolving Fund will generallybe paid, subject to the
terms of the loan agreements and recognizing that those service charges will also be used for other
purposes and may be used for other financing on a parity or subordinate basis,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Burlingame
does hereby resolve as follows:
l. The sewer service charges of the City are hereby identified and dedicated to
repayment of any all State Revolving Fund loans on Project No. C-06-4772-110 as provided in the
applicable loan agreements with the understanding that the sewer service charges will also be used
to pay maintenance and operating expenses of the wastewater system and may be pledged and
applied to repay other obligations of the City on a pafity or subordinate basis, including but not
limited to bonds, notes, leases, and installment contracts.
1
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiSr that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
-
day
of
-,
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C :\FILES\RESO\dedicatsewerfee.pwd.wpd
2
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE
7i
5-20-02
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DArE: May 13,2fi)2
FRoM: Randy Schwartz (55&7307)
SUBJECT:AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE PENINSULA
YMCA ALLOWING FOR BT]RLINGAME RESIDENTS USE OF THE SKATEPARK
OPERATED BY THE YMCA AND THE CITY OF MILLBRAE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Burlingame and the
Peninsula Family YMCA.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Millbrae and the YMCA are constructing a skatepark near the campus of Mills High School, just
north of the BurlingameAvlillbrae Border. This agreement will allow Burlingame residents, for the next
twenty-five (25) years, to enjoy use of the facility and at the same entrance fee charged to yMCA members
and City of Millbrae residents.
The total construction cost of the skatepark is approximately $850,000. The City of Millbrae has contributed
approximately $125,000 in addition to the land and has obtained a $75,000 grant from Land and Water
Conservation. The YMCA has raised the remaining funds through donations and grants. Under this
agreement, the City of Millbrae and the YMCA shall be responsible for the operation of the park, including
staffing, maintenance, etc.
ATTACHMENTS:
Agreement
BUDGET IMPACT:
The City of Burlingame will donate $100,000 towards the construction of the skatepark. These f,urds are
currently in the City's Capital Improvement project budget.
Approved
BY
Su
BY
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH PENINSULA FAMILY YOUNG CHRISTIAN MEN'S
ASSOCIATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF A SKATE PARK
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the Peninsula Family Young Christian Men's Association (YMCA) and the
City of Millbrae have undertaken the development and construction of a skate park at 521Millbrae
Avenue, Millbrae, California, near the northern boundary of the City of Burlingame; and
WHEREAS, the YMCA and the City of Millbrae have graciously agreed to allow residents
of Burlingame to use the park on the same basis as YMCA members and Millbrae residents in
return for a contribution of $100,000 toward the construction costs of the park; and
WHEREAS, this skate park will provide a wonderful recreational opportunity for residents
of Burlingame as well as others; and
WHEREAS, this will be a one-time contribution, and the YMCA and the City of Millbrae
will undertake the operation of the park,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLYED AND ORDERED:
1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Skate Park Agreement
between the City and the Peninsula Family Young Christian Men's Association District as contained
in Exhibit A hereto.
2- The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the Cify of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS
CITY CLERK
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
May 15,2002
Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/
Administrative Services Director
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE s l20l o2
7k
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
BY
BY
stiBJECT: Resolution of Intention:
Broadway Area Business Improvement District - Setting 2002-2003 Assessments
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution of intention and set public hearing
BACKGROLIND: Each year apublic hearing is scheduled to adopt a resolution of intention for the next
fiscal year Broadway area Business lmprovement District assessments. The BID Annual Report and2002-
2003 Budget have been submitted. There are no changes in boundaries, assessments or classification. 'Ihe
recommended hearing date is June 17, 20OZ at 7:00 p.m.
BUDGET IMPACT: Approximately $25,000 in assessments are collected annually with our business
licenses. All of these funds are forwarded to the Broadway Improvement District for improvements as
authorized the BID Board of Directors.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BT'RLINGAME
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH 2002-2003 ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Califomia Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., the
Broadway Area Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of promoting
economic revitalization and physical maintenance of this business district; and
WHEREAS, the Broadway Area Business Improvement District Advisory Board has filed
its 2001-2002 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments for
the2002-2003 year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the annual report for 2001-2002, andit appears
that the BroadwayArea Business Improvement District continues to provide services in enhancing
the District and its businesses and properties,
NOW, THEREFORE, the CityofBurlingame does herebyresolve, determine, and find as
follows:
1. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2002-2003 fiscal
year on businesses in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance No. 1461, to pay for
improvements and activities of the District.
2. The types of improvements and activities proposed to be funded by the levy of
assessments on businesses in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by
reference. These activities and improvements are without substantial change from those previously
established for the District.
3. The method, basis, and amounts for levying the assessments on all businesses within
the District are set forth in Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference, and would remain the
same as those levied in the previous fiscal year.
4. New businesses shall not be exempt from assessment.
5. A public hearing on the proposed assessments for 2002-2003 is hereby set for June
17,2002, at 7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at the Council's Chambers
at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia.
6. TheCouncilwillreceivetestimonyandevidenceatthepublic hearing, and interested
I
persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail
or delivered to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010.
7 . Oral or written protests may be made at the hearing. To count in a majority protest
against the proposed assessment for 2002-2003, a protest must be in writing and submitted to the
City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on May 6,2002. A written protest maybe
withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of that public hearing. Each written protest
shall identiff the business and its address, include a description of the business and the number of
employees. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City of
Burlingame as the owner of the business, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written
evidence that the person is the owner of the business. Any written protest as to the regularity or
sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which
objection is made.
8. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the
owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
assessments of the entire District, as to the proposed assessments for 2002-2003, no assessment for
2002-2003 shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are ofrecord written protests
by the owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the
total assessments ofthe entire District only as to an improvement or activityproposed, then that type
of improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2002-2003 fiscal year.
9 . Further information regarding the proposed assessments and changes and procedures
for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, Califomia, phone 650 - 558-7203. The annual report of the Business Improvement
District is on file and available at the Office of the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
10. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice ofthe public hearing bypublishing this
Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Burlingame in accordance with
2
therequirements oftheGovernment and Streets &Highways Codes andmailingthem inaccordance
with those requirements as applicable.
MAYOR
I,ANNT. MUSSO, CityClerkofthe CityofBurlingamedoherebycertiffthatthe foregoing
ResolutionwasintroducedataregularmeetingoftheCityCouncilonthe-dayof
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
C :\FILES\B IDBRDWY\B DWYINTR2002- 1 A.B ID.wpd
J
l)
EXHIBIT A
TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED
BY THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS
Streetscape Beautification, Seasonal Decorations, and Public Arts Programs
a. Seasonal street plantings of flowers.
b. Seasonal flags and banners.
f. Sidewalk enhancement and maintenance.
Business Recruitment and Retention
a. Matching funds for storefront improvement incentive
b. Develop strategy to fill commercial vacancies.
c. Small business assistance workshops.
Commercial Marketing, Public Relations, and Advertising
a. Organize special events throughout the year.
Shuttle
Establish a people mover system between the area and the hotel district, to be funded on a
cooperative cost sharing basis.
C :\FILES\BIDBRDWY\improvmtli s2000.bid.wpd
2)
3)
4)
BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT BASIS*
BUSINESS TYPE NO. OF STAFF ** ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
EXHIBIT B
4+
| -3
$450
$300
3+
1-2
$2s0
$ls0
3+
| -2
$200
$1s0
NA $s00
* ----- Amount shown is annual total
** --- Staff means any persons working (full time or full time
equivalency) including owners, partners, managers,
employees, family members, etc.
RETAIL &
RESTAURANT
SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL
FINANCIAL
Business Definitions (Burlingame Municipal Code $ 6.52.010)
Retail E Businesses that buy and resell goods. Examples are clothing stores, shoe
stores, office supplies, etc.
tr Selling prepared food and drink.Restaurant
Service
Professional
Financial
E Businesses that sell services. Examples are beauty and barber shops,
repair shops that do not sell goods, contractors, auto shops, etc.
E lncludes engineering firms, architects, attorneys, dentists, optometrists,
physicians, realtors, insurance offices, etc.
E Banks, savings and loans, household finance companies, etc.
C :\FILES\B IDBRDWY\assessbas.bi d.wpd
ROLL CALL
Present:
Staff:
Absent:
Guests.
BURLINGAME BEAUTII'ICATION COMMISSION
Mdf2,20!2
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautffication Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by
Chairperson Locke.
Chairperson Locke, Commissioners Camey, Ellis, Hesselgren, and Lauder
Superintendent Richmond and Administrative Secretary Harvey
Commissioners McGowan and Webb
Residents of the Crossway, Farringdon, Palm Drive neighborhood: Joe Vell4 Adrienne
Jones, Ron Biggs, Paul Delucca Chuck Cafiano, and neighborhood spokesman, John
Hunter : i
MINUTES - The minutes were then approved as submitted; Chairperson Locke abstaining because
she was not present at the meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter to Eric and Jean Adler, 2111 Easton Drive, informing them that the appeal of the denial to remove
a protected Yew tree at their address was denied by the Beautification Commission meeting at the March
7m meeting, because pruning the tree could mitigate their concems.
Letter to Angela Petersen of the Califomia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, thanking her for
her interesting presentation at the March 7s fubor Day celebration at Washinglon Park.
Letter to Tamara Lewis, thanking her for her interesting presentation on Creatine a Wildlife Habitat in the
Home Garden.
FROM THE FLOOR
John Hunter (810 Crossway) and spokesman for his neighborhood, stated the apex at Crossway,
Farringdon, and PaIm is an eyesore; firll of weed, 1- 4 shopping a week, clothing, and beer bottles. He
added that the neighborhood take turns cleaning up the trash. Residents would like this apex to be
converted from an eyesore into a welcoming green zone with the planting of drought resistant plants, a
central tree, and some raised paving stones. Adrienne Jones (neighborhood resident) stated that since
there is no irrigation at the site, a group of neighborhood residents have agreed to water and maintain the
plantings until established. Mr. Hunter concluded that he sent a letter to Superintendent Richmond who
then directed him to the Commission for consideration.
Chairperson Locke clarified with Mr. Hunter that the "neighborhood" is requesting the "City" construct
the project and then the neighborhood would maintain the plantings. Mr. Hunter stated that, that is what
the "neighborhood" is proposing.
Superintendent Richmond stated that the Assistant Director of Public Works saw no reason to preclude
a recommendation by the Beautlfication Commission. Public Works however, does have safety concerns
that must be addressed before any recommendation results in a project.
Commissioner Hesselgren moved that this item be placed on the June 66 agenda for further consideration
and recommendation; seconded (Ellis). Motion carried 5 - 0 - 2 (absent/IVlcGowan and Webb).
Chairperson Locke thanked Mr. Hunter and the neighbors and informed them that the item would be
placed on the June 6m agenda. She added that any information they wish Commission to have in advance
of that meeting, should be sent to the Parks & Recreation Department, (care of the Beautification
Commission) by Tuesday, the week before the meeting.
1
OLD BUSINESS
SprinrGarden Seminar Review - Commissioner Lauder stated that the information Tamara Lewis
presented was excellent and thorough; that, a lot was leamed. Commissioner Ellis agreed and said it was
wonderfi.rl. Commissioner Camey added drat she enjoyed the seminar and said that the handouts were
helpful.
Chairperson Locke stated she was disappointed in the low attendance; around 22. She felt the event had
been given good publicity with press releases, flyers, and the hanging of the barurer. She added that not
charging for the seminar, and having speakers with no name recognition, could give the perception that it
is of no value. However, she concluded that the San Mateo Arboretum seminars only draw an average
attendance of arorurd 15. Following a brief discussion, the Commission decided to make no changes
because the seminar does provide a service to fte Community.
Commissioner Lauder reported that the barurer is old and tom. Commissioner Ellis believed drat it could
be repaired. Commissioners Lauder and Ellis will coordinate possible repairs to the banner.
REPORTS
Richmond -
1) The tree contractor is currently trirnrning the Eucalyptus grove at Ray Park.
2) The Califomia Conservation Corps has been conducting fiail repair, fire brakes, and weed control
in Mills Canyon. The Corps will retum later to do confact work for the Fire Department.
3) Boston Ily has been planted along the fence on Califomia Drive at Oak Grove because it will spread
quickly and chips are being spread in the comer landscaped area.
4) Safe Tree Program (funded by the shareholders of PG&E) has provided a list of trees suitable to be
planted under primary utility lines; the Official Street Tree list will be revised to include some of the
flowering and fall color species not already on the list.
Hesselsren - Commissioner Hesselgren reported that she has received numerous citizen complaints with
regard to the construction staging area on the eastside of CalifomiaDrive, south ofoak Grove. Comments
she has received include that a constmction yard should not be located in such a close proximity to a matn
downtown area; and that fence could have been higher to hide oversized tmcks and equipment.
Locke -
1) Chairperson Locke reported that someone has dumped a microwave oven in the area of Skyline Blvd.
and Trousdale Drive.
2) The Golden Chordsmen have cleaned the eastside of El Camino Real, from Murchison Drive to
Dufferin Avenue, as part of the CalTrans Adopt-A-Highway program.
3 ) Weeds are growing in some of the tree wells on Califomia Drive where the new trees have
been planted.
4) The Pennisetum and the fescue grass recently planted on Broadway looks terrible and needs
maintaining. Superintendent Richmond stated he believed that the current contract will include
changing some plant material.
5) Reported on an article on how "roundabouts" at intersections can help to slow traffic and reduce
accidents by 3 8%. Superintendent Richmond responded that the City Council has been reviewing
traffic calming altematives and recommended she contact the Assistant Public Works Director,
Frank Erbacher, for further information.
Carnev - Commissioner Camey reported that graffitti is on the soundwall on Rollins Road.
2
REPORTS - (Contd.)
Lauder -
Commissioner Lauder reported that Oleander and 3 Willow trees have been planted at the Broadway/101
triangle; one of the Oleanders has died and the others are in poor health but the Willow ffees are surviving.
She has asked Mike Petersen of CalTrans to have someone check the irrigation and has asked when the
gazanias and the iceplant will be installed, installation of those plantings was to have occurred last Fall.
Chairperson Locke expressed frustration with the lack of follow tkough she and Commissioner Lauder
have experienced on this project with CalTrans.
Commissioner Lauder commented thatthe fibrous begonias planted at the Burlingame Train Station look
great.
There being no further business, Chairperson Locke adjoumed the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Respectfirlly submitted,
Harvey
Recording Secretar_v
3
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
May 13,2002
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran called the May 13,2002, regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Browprigg, Keighran, Keele,
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner Keylon; City
Attorney, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza
III.ROTATION OF OTTICERS
Chairman Vistica stepped down as chairman of the Planning Commission.
He thanked the Planning Commissioners for all their hard work this past
year; they made the right decision on a lot of projects. C. Keighran was
seated as the new Planning Commission Chair, C. Boju6s was seated as Vice
Chair, and C. Osterling was seated as Secretary.
IV. MINUTES Chair Keighran noted that on page I 0 of the minutes of the Apirl 22, 2002
meeting, for I128 JuanitaAvenue the vote was 5-0-2,not 7-0. The minutes
were approved as corrected.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
VI. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VII. STUDY ITEMS
Chair Keighran noted that as part of their job, the Commissioners visit each site before the meeting.
826 ALPINE AVENUE - ZONED R-I - APPLICATION FOR SIDE AND REAR SETBACK
VARIANCES FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND
I
SEAN
CP Monroe presented a srmlmary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: if the garage were detached,
does new gym room meet accessory strucfure requirements; besides gym and office, what new uses are
proposed for this space; what is the hardship on the property for the setback variances, cannot see hardship;
the illegal construction required removing the rearportion ofthe existing garage building, can the addition
be reconfigured to eliminate the variance; looks like this area can still become a second unit.
There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar when all the information
has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:76 p.m.
\-
)
City of Burlingurw Plaming Conlmksion U napfu oued Minutes May 13,2002
329 PRIMROSE ROAD, SUITE 208 - ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A - APPLICATION FOR -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR REAL ESTATE USE (LINDA VRNAK, APPLICANT; G,W.
WILLIAMS COMPANY. PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Planner Keylon presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: what is the projected
number of clients in the next2 to 5 years, application does not show increase; applicant should be able
have more clients as business grows; what hours is the office expected to be used on the weekends.
There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar when all the information
has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m.
3. ZONING AMENDMENT. RETAIL SALES AND HEALTH SERVICES ON BROADWAY
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: on page 2, can we re-word
graphic arts definition to mc ie clearly define "substantial taxable sales", can it be defined as not less than
25o/o of the gross revenue; concerned that allowing health and beauty services above the first floor on
Broadway is a change in policy from having the two areas match regulations of the standards on
Burlingame Avenue-can we get minutes from the City Council meeting where this issue was discussed.
There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar. This item concluded at
7:26 p.m.
VIII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on
simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the
public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Chair Keighran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. There were no requests-
4a.2303 TROUSDALE DRIVE .ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR A PRTVATE NON-PROFIT SCHOOL ON AN EXISTING SCHOOL SITE
(ERUDITE-HOPE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, APPLICANT; KASTROP GROUP, INC., ARCHITECT;
BI.IRLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
ERIKALEWTT
4b.1323 CARLOS A\TENUE . ZONED R-l . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED
TWO-CAR GARAGE (BRIAN ROCHE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, CHU
DESIGN & ENGR., D.IC., DESIGNER)
PROJECT SEAN O'ROURKE
1336 PALOMA AVENUE . ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF AN
APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW SINGLE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING -
(ALEXANDER HIDCHENKO, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD & ASSOCIATES,
2
4c.
5.
City of Burlingame Pktrning Commissian Unapproved Minutes May 13,2002
DF,STGNF,R) PRO]F,CT RUBEN HURIN
C. Osterling noted he did not want to call off item 4c but asked for clarification on the garage situation at
1337 Paloma Avenue. CP Monroe explained that a condition has been added that a new garage shall be
built with the house.
C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioners
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the
motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m.
IX. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
AMEND REGULATIONS TO EXTEND TIME FRAME FOR SECOND UNIT AMNESTY
PROGRAM
PROJECT PI,A MARGARET MONROE
Reference staff report,05.l3.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the public hearing
was closed.
Commission discussion: would like to see program extended 2 years until2004
C. Vistica moved to recommend to City Council the ordinance extending the second unit amnesty program
for two years until 2004 and giving applicants one yetr following the approval to make nay required
improvements.
The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to City Council that second unit
amnestyprogram be extended for two years to 2004 andrequiring any improvements within one year. The
motion was passed on a 7-0 vote.
6.2304 EASTON DRIYE . ZONED R-I . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS RUFFAT,
STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; JOSE L, AND MARIA R.
REALYVAS QUEZ, PROPERTY OWNERS)
r5J NOTTCF,D)PLANNER: CA KEYLON
C. Osterling noted that he lived within 500 feet ofthis site and recused himself. He stepped down from the
dias. Reference staffreport, 05.13.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria
and Staff comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. John Stewart, architect, and Lou Realyvasquez, property owner,
were available for questions. Commission asked if the roofpitch was the same, it just continues up. John
3
\-
City of Burlingarne Planning Commrssion U napprov ed Miruttes May 13,2N2
Stewart noted yes, that at the front there is still a flat roof at the rear of the house. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Boju6s noted that the applicant had addressed the design issues discussed by the Commission. The
design is good and fits in the neighborhood, so he moved to approve the application, byresolution, with the
following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department date stamped April 26,2002, Sheets A1 through A7, site plan, floor plans and building
elevations; z)thatanychanges to the size or envelope ofthe basement, first or second floors, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the project shall comply with the
Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new
construction and alterationprojects to submit aWasteReductionPlanandmeetrecyclingrequirements; any
partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 4) thatthe
conditions of the Recycling Specialist's March 20, 2002 and the City Engineer's and Chief Building
Official's March 25,2002 memos shall be met; and 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Califomia Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was
seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on the motion: applicant made suggested changes; design has improved; commend architect for
work on this project.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 vote
(C. Osterling abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m.
C. Osterling took his seat on the dias.
1310 BAYSWATER AVENUE - ZONED C-l . APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATTVE
DECLARATION, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING
VARIANCE FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHURCH FACILITY (ST. CATHERINE OF
SIENNA CHURCH, APPLICANT; KODAMA DISENO ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT; ROMAN
CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO, PROPERTY OWNER) (125 NOTICED)
PRO.TECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Reference staff report ,05 .L3 .}z,with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria
and Staff comments. Twenty-one ccinditions were suggested for consideration.
Staff noted that a condition has been added requiring the church to have valet service for large church
functions, they have also arranged to use parking on nearby properties. Commission asked for clarification
on FAR calculations for areas in the building with l2-foot height or greater, is all of the FAR area counted
toward the parking requirement, should financial limitations be considered for variance findings, and could
a conditions be added that the parking will be evaluated on an arurual basis. Staff explained that areas over
12 feetin height are counted as a two floors for FAR calculations, but only the first floor is count'ed toward
the parking requirement. Financial limitations should not be considered in making findings for a variance.
Staff stated that a condition can be added regarding annual parking evaluation, it works best if it is reviewed -
each year for a designated time like 5 years and upon complaint.
7
4
City of Burlingwne Ploming Commission U nappr oved Minutes May |j,2002
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. MaitzaDegadillo ofKodama Diseno Architects represented the
project. She explained that the at the last meeting the Commission had expressed concern over the parking
situation and asked them to look at a two-story option for the parish hall. They have submitted a response
packet to address the Commission's comments, which all the Commissioners have in their staffreport. Have
addressed parking concern with valet service that would accommodate 90 cars off-site. Met with design
reviewer, Jerry Winges, and went over two-story options. Design reviewer made a positive
recommendation based on the one-story option and has suggested some design changes, which have been
made and are on the plans before the Commission. Jim Veehill, civil engineer working on lot merger, was
available for questions.
Commission asked: design reviewer noted that original roof design has various slopes, why; new northeast
wall on parish hall in courtyard area between the church and parish hall shows greenscreen or lattice gttds
on landscape plan, but this wall does not seem appropriate for landscaping, could be a good dodge ball wall,
landscaping would not survive here; please clarify why two-story alternative would not work; would two-
story option encroach as much into usable parking lot; does the school have safety guards around the
exterior of the school, the Primrose and Park intersections, as well as on-site; is the new fence shown on
the landscape plan wrought iron; has the opening between the comer of the parish hall and the adjacent
apartment building been reviewed for appropriate exit width, seems very tight.
The project architect responded and explained that the roof slopes were originally designed to address
drainage, but have been changed per the design reviewer's recommendation; they are not opposed to
removing the landscaping and greenscreen from the northeast wall, they were responding to design
reviewer's comment to visually soften the area with landscaping; a two-story structure would require the
parking layout to be reconfigured and they would only gain three or four parking spaces, would not gain a
whole aisle of parking due the large footprint required for a two-story structure to accommodate two
stairwells and elevator; there are safety guards that are on the school site, and Sister Theresa will work with
the parents on new drop-off and pick-up procedures, usually takes about four weeks to train everyone; the
separation between the parish hall and adjacent apartment building was reviewed with the Fire Marshal
early on in the processing of this project, and it meets the required existing width. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: excellent job responding to the Commission's concems; would like to add a
condition that the applicant will provide a construction employee parking plan along with a construction
delivery schedule and safety precautions during construction; would like to add another condition that one
year after the completion ofthe project, and every subsequent year for five years, the parking plan and drop-
off, pick-up circulation shall be reviewed, and will always be review on a complaint basis; what is history
of public parking lot G, how did the City obtain this lot from St. Catherine's. Staff noted that in the 1960's
assessment district for parking used revenues to buy public parking lots; part of the was purchasing the
church site; troubled by loss of parking caused by this project; once building is constructed there is no
remedy; design element is nice; looking to the church to enforce conditions; there is no going back once
this building is constructed; history of this project is unique, could have had parking on adjacent lot that
City bought for the beneficial use of the community; this is a highly developed urban area.
C. Keele citing comments made to support the mitigated negative declaration, the conditional use permit
and the parking variance, moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended
5
City of Burlingame Plaming C unmission U ruppr ov ed Miruttes May 13,2002
conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departmen -
date stamped May 3,2002, siteplan, floorplan, roofplan, elevations, tentative and final parcel map, sheets
A0.1 through A4.0, sheet 1 and sheet, figure 6, and landscape plan, sheet Ll.O;2)that the church shall
require valet parking on-site for large groups using the church facilities outside ofschool hotrs or in special
circumstances during the school day and the church shall maintain cooperative agreements for joint use of
available off-site parking lots nearby to alleviate the on-street parking demand created by single large events
or overlapping large events using the church facilities; failure to maintain the valet parking opporlunity
shall be cause for the conditional use and parking variance to be reviewed by the Planning Commission; 3)
that one year after the completion of the project(2003) and every subsequent year for five years (2008),
and./or anytime upon complaint, the applicant shall submit a parking and circulation status report to the
Planning Department for evaluation; 4) that ifthe applicant wishes the greenscreen shown on page L1.0 on
the plans date stamped May 3,2002, proposed for the northeast elevation, shall be eliminated and the area
converted to usable play area for the students at the school; 5) that any changes to the size or envelope of
building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
6)that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 14,2001 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 6,
2001memo, the Chief Building Official's August 27 ,2}}lmemo and the Recycling Specialist's August 29,
2001memo shall be met; 7) that an application for a parcel map to merge the four lots shall be processed
and granted before the foundation inspection is scheduled; 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements
of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame; 9) that the applicant shall provide to the City a construction employee parking plan,
construction delivery and staging plan, and a safety plan demonstrating what safety measures will be -implemented to ensure the children's safety on-site during the construction of the parish hall; a building
permit shall not be issued until the proposed plans have been approved by the City Engineer;lO) that all
runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System OfPDES) standards; off-site runoff shall be diverted around the
construction site and all on-site runoff shall be diverted around exposed construction areas;1 l) that methods
and procedures such as sediment basins or kaps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, straw bale dikes, check
dams storm drain inlet protection soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded
areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment controls continuously until
permanent erosion controls have been established;12)that all constrdCtion materials and waste, including
solid wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediment, shall be stored,
handled and disposed of properly to prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants into stormwater; 13)
that no vehicles or equipment (construction) shall be cleaned, fueled or maintained on-site, except in
designated areas where runoff is contained and treated;14) that construction access routes shall be limited in
order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks
using dry sweeping methods; 15) that if construction is done during the wet season (October 15 through
April 15), prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the
potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and
sediment controls prior to, during, and immediately after each storm event; stabilizing disturbed soils
throughout temporary or pernanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access
to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels
and other chemicals;1 6) that trash receptacles shall be placed throughout the common pedestrian circulation ^areas and shall be regularly emptied; 17) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and
protected from roof and surface drainage and that, if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-
6
City of Bwlingame Plarning Commrssion U nappr ov ed Mirwtes Ma1 13,2002
contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor;lS) that the site shall be
sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction and construction equipment emissions
shall be in compliancewiththe standards ofthe SanFrancisco BayAreaAirQualityManagement District;
19)that St. Catherine of Siena School shall compile a set ofguidelines to distribute to all parents with clear
and detailed instruction as to the new drop-off and pick-up conf,rguration. The following criteria shall be
included as part of the guidelines: 1) that each parent shall be required to stay with his/her vehicle during
the drop-off and pick-up process and shall not leave their vehicle unattended in the playground area; and2)
that all vehicles shall enter the school drop-off and pick-area from Park Road and shall exit onto Primrose
Road, with all vehicles in the left lane making a left turn only onto Primrose Road, heading southbound on
Primrose Road and all vehicles in the right lane making a right tum only onto Primrose Road heading
northbound;20)thatSt. Catherine of Siena school shall provide teachers, staff and/orvolunteers to monitor
the morning drop-off and escort the children to the appropriate vehicles for pick-up in the afternoons to
ensure that children are safely making their way to and from the vehicles and keep the flow of traffic going
through this area; 2l) that all construction shall be required to be done in accordance with the limits to
hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipa' Ccde; 22) that the existing water meter
in the proposed driveway on Park Road shall be relocated to outside of the driveway approach in the public
right-of-way;23)thatthe project shall complywith CityofBurlingame's exterior illumination Ordinance
1477; and24) that if any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all
work will be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as
determined by qualified experts selected bythe City, can be implemented. The motion was seconded by C.
Boju6s.
Comment on the motion: do not support the parking variance based on finding that church land is now
being used for City parking lot, community use, do not owe a parking variance because City has parking lot
that was once church parking; church must continue with cooperation on valet parking; church should
consider assigning a parking coordinator to monitor this process; beautiful project, it is unfortunate that
parking is being lost as a result; could have a two-story option, but would not generate good architecture;
parish hall has good vocabulary, nicely executed with the existing church structure; project is benefit to the
community; applicant has cooperated with the City and will continue to work with the City to make things
work with (valet) parking; church needs to make sure there is someone to oversee construction on-site; are
there NPDES measures incorporated into this project.
CE Murtuza explained to the Commission that in general it is common to have a construction manager on
the job site; this personwill submit constructionplans to thePublic Works Departrnent; that includes access
routes and anticipated encroachments onto public property. Public Works can require that a construction
manager is available on-site throughout the construction process and that this person's phone number is
available to anyone affect through CityHall. General practice also includes the contractor fencing off the
main construction areas, and using measures to keep any stormwater run-off from flowing off-site onto
other properties and other areas of the church site as required by NPDES.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve The motion passed on a J -0 vote. App eal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:25 p.m.
1I
\-
City of Burlingmne Plmning Curtmission Unapprooed Minutes May 13,2002
A. TENTATIYE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT MERGER
Chair Keighran noted that the action on this item is a recommendation to City Council.
C. Vistica made a motion to recommend approval of this tentative and final parcel map for a lot merger
at the St. Catherine of Siena site at 1310 Bayswater Avenue, with the conditions found in the April 30,
2002, memo from the Engineering Division. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the tentative and final map to City
Council. The motion passed on a7-0 vote. This item concluded at 8:27 p.m.
1409 ROLLINS ROAD . ZONED M.l . APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT TO EXTEND THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND EXPAND RENTAL FLEET FOR
AN EXISTING AUTO RENTAL BUSINESS (XABIER BERRT]ETA, ENTRPRTSE RENT-A-CAR,
APPLICANT; HONERLAN TRLII-,T, PROPERTY OPWNER) (23 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
CATHERINEKEYLON
Reference staff report ,05 .13 .02, with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria
and Staff comments. Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked for
clarification on the fleet numbers since previous approval noted 50-1 5 vehicles on-site; is this proposal for
30 additional vehicles? Staff explained that this permit will replace previous permit, this proposal is for a
total of 60 fleet vehicle on-site plus employee and customer vehicles on-site. As part of employee benefits,
6 of the 8 employees on-site go to and from work in fleet vehicles.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Xabier Berreuta, regional manger and applicant for Enterprise
Rent-a-Car, was available to answer questions. Commission asked if cars are washed on-site. Applicant
stated that no, the cars are driven to two local carwashes, one on Broadway the other on North Carolan.
Commission noted that although the applicant has stated that they are going to have landscaping maintained
on a weekly basis, they currently are doing business at the site, and the landscaping is unkempt. Applicant
stated that they know that the weeds were really overgrown on the Carolan side ofthe property and recently
had them removed. Commission rcJornmend that theynot use sod on the site on Rollins Road, but instead
plant small-scale shrubs, they are easier to maintain and look nicer, add color. Commission suggested that a
condition be added to require maintenance of landscaping, that if a car wash area is ever added that an
oiVsand separator shall be required and that all loading and unloading ofvehicles shall be done on-site and
there shall be no loading or un-loading of vehicles within the public right-of-way. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions:
l)that the project shall be built and the site shall be configured as shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Department and date stamped May 3, 2002, site plan and floor plan;2) that the existing 1,830 SF
of landscaping on-site (5.5%) shall be retained, automatic irrigation shall be installed and it shall be
maintained by the tenant regularly on a weekly basis; 3) that the car rental business shall have regular
business hours from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m., closed on Sunday; 4) thatthe car rental fleet operated from this site shall be limed to a maximum of -
60 vehicles; all fleet vehicles, employee and customers shall park on-site at1409 Rollins Road; there shall
8.
8
x"
9.
City of Burlingane Planning Cunmissiut U nappr ort ed Mirwtes May 13,2002
be no parking of fleet vehicles along Rollins Road orNorth Carolan; 5) that no off-loading or on-loading of
vehicles from trucks shall take place on the public street or on any public right-of-way; 6) that the applicant
shall stripe the parking area on-site to accommodate aIl60 rental fleet vehicles as well as the 9 required
parking spaces for the office and customer parking; and no employee or fleet vehicles shall ever be parked
on the public right-of-way or across the public sidewalks; 7) thatthere shall be no maintenance or washing
of vehicles on the site unless approved by the City Engineer; 8) that any on-site car-washing facility
approved in the future by the City Engineer shall be equipped with a sand/oil separator; and shall not
encroach upon the on-site storage area for the 60 fleet vehicles or employee or visitor/customer parking, or
required landscaping or on on-site area used for loading or off-loading rental vehicles; 9) that any
improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by
the City of Burlingame; 10) that the conditiols- of the City Engineer's memo of February 11,2002 shall be
met; and 1 1) that crushed aggregatebetween 3/8" and 3/c" shallbe laid over the existing dirt/gravel area at the
rear ofthe lot to address NPDES concerns and to allow stormwater filtration.The motion was seconded by
C. Vistica.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a7 -0 vote. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:38 p.m.
DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
705 BURLINGAME AVENUE . ZONED R.l . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION EUGENE A. BORDEGARAY SR., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;
EUGENE JR. AND LORRAINEBORDEGARAY, PROPERTY OWNERS) ( 64NOTTCED) PROJECT
PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Planner Keylon brieflypresented the project description. Commission asked if the rear yard trellis counted
toward the overall FAR, and asked why the applicant did not submit a fulI floor plan. Staffstated that the
trellis count toward both lot coverage and FAR, and that the proposed project only changes the area shown
and that the rest of the floor area not shown will remain unchanged.
Chair Keiglran opened the pu ,'!i : comment. Eugene Bordegaragy Sr., project applicant, was available to
answer any questions. He explained that this property is owned by his son and daughter-in-law.
Commission noted that on the top floor there is an area called out with "new rock" fascia and asked how the
material is applied. Applicant stated that it is a manufactured stone that is applied to the stucco surface.
Commission asked if the applicant was set on applyrng this fascia or would they consider removing it. The
applicant stated that they would not be opposed to removing it from the top floor. Commission noted that
the stone fascia is also along the bottom and doesn't seem to blend well with the new stone all the way at
the top of the house. Applicant noted they had considered adding stone around the front door, that would
tie to the stone on the second floor. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing
was closed.
Commission discussion: all the massing is articulated; nothing has big plane; a lot of time was taken to
design this addition, nice job; design has a homegrown quality; stone work on top floor enhances home
craft feel, but it is o.k. either with or without it; stone appears to stand out too much and becomes focal
point, should eliminate; nicely landscaped project; either add more stone to connect the bottom obscure
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission U napprou ed Minutes Ma1 13,2002
stone fascia to the new stone fascia proposed on the top level or do away with it completely; add wrough,
1
iron work that is found on the first floor front fagade to the second floor to tie them together.
Chair Keiglrran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded
by C. Auran.
Comment on motion: nice job overall; no consensus on the Commission regarding the stone fascia, it is up
to the applicant to work out; if stone work is retained, there should be more stone work added around the
door to pick up the stone work on the new addition above.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:54 p.m.
IA.282I TIBURON WAY ZONED R.l APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEV/, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW
TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND
ARCHITECT; GEORGE TAN, PROPERTY OWNER) (39 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Planner Keylon briefly presented the project description. Staffnoted that a memo dated May 7,2002,was
submitted by John Stewart, project architect, stating that to address view concems of the neighbors they will -reduce the plate height from 9'6" to 8'6", and the overall height will be reduced by 2 feetby adding a flat
area to the top of the roof. He submitted a rendering showing these changes. There were two letter in
opposition received after the preparation of the staff report.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, presented the project. He noted that
the project was originally designed with the garage on the left, but the redesigned to tuck the garage back
into the hill, they are trying to be sensitive to the neighbor's view. Since the May 7,2002 memo was
submitted to the Commission, they met again with the neighbors and have made some more changes to the"" ' plans. In order to reduce the height ofthe new house to a height not taller than the existing ridge height, the
' plate height will be lowered to 8 feet. They also suggested having a surveyor hired to shoot the floor
elevations before the framing inspection to give the neighbor's reassurance that they will not exceed the
height limit. Also plan on giving neighbors color samples to insure that they will not be using a reflective
roofing color. Architect also suggested putting up story poles. Homeowneq Mrs. Tan, put notices
regarding the project in her neighbor's mailboxes, but the neighbor to the right was the only one who asked
to meet.
VivianLee,2SS4ArgaelloDrive,AnnMarieUmland,1600SebastianDrive,DanSu,2830ArguelloDrive,
John Roman,2839 Arguello Drive, and Lauren Wells 2818 Arguello Drive spoke with concerns about the
project. Would like written guarantee from owners that grading for the project will have no effect on their
property for l0 years; how can this work be engineered; this is abig dig into the mountain; soil in this area
has a lot of movement subsurface creeks; the proposed house has a different character than the rest of the
neighborhood; will this addition divert water onto other adjacent properties, what are the ramifications of
the project; new bedroom will be next to existing bedroom on adjacent property, privacy will be lost, can a
10
Ci4 of Burlmgarne Plorrning Cunmission Unapprwed Mirwtes May 13,2402
larger fence be built; can the project be scaled back , take neighbors concerns into consideration; need soils
report and storypoles; concemed with loss of view, noise, extra cars and possible second units. There were
no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Visitica stated that the architect understands the concerns stated and made a motion to place this item
on the regular action calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked:
o entry shown on rendering has a heavy shadow line over the door, makes entry a predominant
feature, entry is grandiose, shape of entry is not consistent with the neighborhood; need to scale
back;
. fullbathroom on bottom floor next to bedroom with direct exterior access appears to be a possible
second unit; guest room on lower level o.k., should be adjusted so can not be a second unit,
remove exterior door, reduce size of bathroom (no shower);
o make sure that the lights shown at the front are not too bright and stand out;
. applicant needs to address geologic survey/soils concerns;
. overall appreciate the architect taking the garage out of the front element;
. need to see revised drawings that reflect the changes that were discussed; and
. before action meeting erect story poles with netting in between, story poles should reflect
modified design.
This motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on motion: public comments well taken, but the architect did a good job on keeping the height
down; project is below allowable FAR, this is not a monster house.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when
plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's
action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at9:22p.m.
11.1128 CAMBRIDGE ROAD ZONED R.I APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR IIEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (GREG AND TRICIA- HAGEY, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; GREG HAGEY, ARCHITE CT) (67 NOTICED)
PRO]ECT PT,A RI]BEN HIIRTN
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commission asked what is the size of the window
exception allowed to encroach into the declining height envelope. Staffexplained that the Code allows a
window enclosure that creates no more than 35 SF of floor area within the structure.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Greg Hagey, property owner and architect, was present to
answer questions. He explained that he and his wife came up with a complex roof design for this acldition
to do awaywith the boxy look ofmany additions on other houses in the neighborhood. Wanted to include a
lot of variation and have tested roof design and know that it will work. There were no other comments
from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission comments: great improvement to the neighborhood; charming addition; articulation is found
on all elevations.
\-
11
City of Burlingame Plarming Commission U rwppr w, ed Minutes May lj,2002
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked:
o need to check with Staff to make sure that the window enclosure on the left side does not exceed
35 SF;
. concem with roof height compared to adjacent structures, may be out of place; scale down;
o concemed with compatibility of top floor;
o look at height; can get design you want within 30 foot height limit;
. make sure that the roof structure can be built as shown;
o need to see roof pitches on revised drawings; look at reducing pitch; special permit for height is
used to enhance architectural style, see if some height can be reduced;
This motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on motion: nice design, project is on the right track; mass and bulk o.k., wayunder FAR; sharp
pitch does not have much bulk, won't feel as tall as it looks.
Chair Keigluan called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a roll call vote 6-l (C. Keele dissenting). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:36 p.m.
t2 l2O4 CABRILLO AVENUE ZONED R-l APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL -
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT EI{VELOPE FOR A NEW, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TOM BAZZONE APPLICANT; JAMES CHU, CHU
DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER; MII(E MLSON, PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER:THERINE KEYLON
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Staff noted that there was a one letter in support and
one letter in opposition at the Commissioner's desks received after the preparation of the staff report.
Commissioners asked the CA Anderson the following: clarify how this is, a new application; is this
processing setting a precedent, doesn't builder have to bear some ofthe burden for the unpermitted changes
and what options for action are available to the Planning Commission; does the Planning Commission have
authority to suggest removal of a red tag; who is the owner of the property and can the owner pull permits
or does it have to be a licensed contractor; can the original project be built as approved last year. CA
Anderson advised the Plaruring Commission to look at the entire house as a new application, not the
changes from the original approval, will this design fit in with the neighborhood, what is best for the
neighborhood; what was built without permit does not exist as far as the City is concerned; red tag has
stopped work on the site for a few months now and is a significant impact on the builder; building permit
penalties will be assessed on the new submittal for additional plan check; comments the Commission makes
on the request to continue work on the site will be passed along the Building Official who issues the red
tags; and the person who took out this permit was a licensed contractor; old application that was approved
still entitles the applicant to build the old project but they are proposing something different tonight.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Michael Kaindl, Chu Design & Engineering, 39 W. 43'd
Avenue, San Mateo, presented the project. He gave a packet to the Planning Commission including a
IZ
City of Burlingame Planning Cornmission UruppovedMirurtes May 13,2002
rendering of the proposed house, photos of the existing conditions,4 pages including 13 signatures of
neighbors in support ofthe project. The property is in escrow to a new buyer but can not close escrow
because ofthe red tag. Second floor interior finish is done, need to do first floor finish now, can't because
of red tag. New design includes abellyband, oval window in the laundry room, arched entry, omamental
planters, shutters with working hardware, and a new side gate. The roofwill also be lowered below the 30
foot height limit. The neighbor on the comer that would be most affected by the declining height envelope
encroachment on the right side has no problem with the project, declining height exception. The left side of
the house is totallywithin the declining height envelope. The second exhibit was passed up to the Planning
Commissioners which shows a diagram of the house with the reduced second floorplate height, plate height
varies to under 5 feet. This would result in a loss of 187 SF of living space verses 150 SF of voided area.
Reducing the plate height requires demolition ofthe roof struchre, and would require expensive demolition
to the project, the second floor finished interiorwould need to be protected, and bedroom number 2 would
be reduced by 30%. The landscape plan has been redone with a specimen tree added along the right side.
The dormers have been changed from hip to gable, design is articulated. Actual usable space in this house
is 2,800 SF (84%) where the Code calculations come up_ wrjh 3,413 SF cf floor area. Reducing the plate
height would require very careful dismantling and would take 4 months. Commission asked the actual
height of the structure and the separation between the roofridges on the right side; the applicant stated that
it is 2'8" above the height limit, 32'8"; and that there is about a 4' setback total for the 3 roof ridges on the
right side.
Bill Tatum , 1205 Cortez Avenue, Pat Harding 1205 Cortez Avenue, Nancy Kux, I 208 Cortez Avenue, and
Betty Blumer, 1702 Broadway spoke in opposition to the project. They had the following comments and
concerns: original plate height was suppose to be 2'6" lower, now taller causing loss of light and privacyto
homes and backyards; looking at project as new application is against the purpose of the planning
Commission; what is cost to lift, excavate and rebuild the foundation; if project is approved as currently
presented it will be rewarding applicant for circumventing the rules; height is a concern; house should be
built as originally approved; the neighbors have been intimidated by the people involved in this process, so
neighbors do not want to show up at the public hearings; had a garage, small projects whichhad to go
through the entire Planning process and comply, not fair to let this large project go on through without
complying; don't want,lo give message that it is easier for the applicant to come ask the Commission for
forgiveness than it is to ask forpermission; there have been too manyvi-.ii:lions on this project. There were
no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
The commission had the following comments and concerns with the project:
o should be no voided areas on the second floor, should be counted toward FAR or eliminated;
concerned with precedent; there can be frrture expansion of living space in these areas; pull in exterior
walls where there is dead space;
o need more contextual information, footprint and height of adjacent skuctures and how this structure
will fit in; provide elevations showing adjacent structures to see how they are affected;
o front elevations does not blend in with itself; roof pitch should be lowered;
o FAR is only 7 SF under maximum allowed;
o look at elevations, massive and bulky;
o special permit for declining height envelope is usually granted to enhance design, this declining height
envelope does not enhance the design, eliminate the speciar permit;
o rear elevation looks like it has a tower that is separate for the rest of the house, should blend;
\-
13
\-
City of Burlingame Plaming Cornmission U napprooed Minutes May 13,2002
o look at design review guidelines, mass and bulk of this structure is too large, needs to comply;
. if voided areas are retained, the interior wall should be a shear wall to prevent the area from being
opened up and used as livable floor area;
. roof over entry is awkward, roof line could tie in with bedroom on the right side;
. bay window on the left side needs more detailing perhaps a cooper roof;
o dormers on the right side should be similar; and
o service door should have a vent or louver.
Chair Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made.
This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s.
Comment on motion: project architect has a lot of experience and understands how to revise the project
incorporating the above comments; may help to have a third parfy looking this project; design reviewer will
be put in an awkward position since it is impossible not to be in conflict with the cost involved with the
changes; there is a lot ofwork to be done regarding mass and bulk; mayhelp to send to design reviewer and
will save time in the long run.
XI. PLANNERREPORTS
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the City Council at their May 6, 2002, meeting. She noted
that they directed the staff and commission to undertake a review and update of the
Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan as well as approving the consultant contract for preparation of
the North End Specific Area Plan.
Planning Commission subcommittee appointments
CP Monroe noted that the work program for the coming year indicated that the Commission
would need four working subcommittees. Chair Keighran suggested assignments and asked the
commissioners to consider them and tabled the appointrnents to the next Planning Commission
meeting.
FYI Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1404 Hillside Circle.
Planning Commissioners noted that they had looked over the changes proposed, they seemed
consistent with the approved design and no further action was required.
Next steps in review of 1450 Howard Avenue
t4
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to refer this project to a design review consultant with the
direction given by the Planning Commission. The motion passed on a roll call vote 5-2-0 (Cesrs. Keele and
Osterling dissenting). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item
concluded at 10:36 p.m. -\
Review of City Council regular meeting of May 6,2002.
City of Burlingame Planting Commission U nappr ou e d Minutes Ma1 13,2002
CP Monroe reminded the Planning Commission of the Special Study meeting scheduied for the
Safewayproject at 1450 Howard Avenue on May 23,2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lane Community
Room at the Library. She noted that the Commission agenda for the regular meeting on June l0
was already filling, and that it might be preferable to set the public hearing on the environmental
document and project for a special meeting. Commission discussed this and determined that
they would all be available on Thursday, June 20, 2002, for the hearing. CP Monroe said she
would schedule and advertise the meeting accordingly.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Keighran adjoumed the meeting at 1l:05 p'm.
Respectfully submitted,
'l!
Ralph Osterling, Secretary
TINAPPROVEDMINUTESs. I 3
trtrlt
15
CITY OF BARLINGAME
TEIS !,IONTB
MONTIILY PERMIT ACTIVITY APRIL 2002
BUII-DING INSPECTION
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
FISCAIJ YIAR
TO DATE
TEIE YE.T,R
-.
TO DATE
# galuatioD
3 $1, 1oO , ooo
0 $0
3 $148,000
113 $4 t 288 ,460
29 l!2 ,468 ,59L
1s $19, s00
4 $71,000
10 $26,000
0 s0
68 191"2,657
L7 $73, 1s0
23 $1,20 t 844
27 $893, s28
,
SAIi{E MONTH
LAST YEAR
PermL! ltDe
New Single Family
New Multi-Family
New Cornmercial
Alt.erations -Res
Alterat ions -NonRes
Demolition
swirruning Pool
Sigrr Permit.g
Fences
Reroofing
Repairs
window Repl
Miscellaneous
valuat,ioa
$300,000
$o
$100,000
$693,145
$5ss, o0o
$o
$25,000
$2,800
$o
s3 08,6s5
$17,100
$38, 837
9228 , 8],0
ValuaElo!
$o
$o
$800, 0oo
$1,100,3s0
$1,101,500
$74, ooo
$o
$6, eoo
$o
9280 ,462
$195,000
$48 ,644
$8s,500
VaIuatIo!
$947 , lso
$o
$2,88s,000
i3 t770,167
$3,798,7s0
$111,s00
$22 t s3S
$3s,1s3
$o
$741,701
$2s5,500
$155, 984
$6Is,471
valuatio!
$3,710,000
$o
$10,248,000
59 ,887 t 269
$17,383,499
$s8, so0
$93,000
$66 , 82s
$6,700
s2 ,38s , 644
i9L ,25O
$352,705
$1, s04, 757
#
1
0
1
24
8
3
1
0
23
4
3
_ I.A8T MOI{TE
* valuatlo!
2 $800,000
0 $0
0 $0
30 $903,454
7 $393,635
4 $7, soo
1 $18,500
4 $15, 900
0 $0
t2 $160,233
3 $11,s00
4 l22 t 9t1
7 s98,080
#
0
0
1
23
5
6
0
,
0
19
5
5
9
*
3
0
3
9r
14
1
10
0
61
15
19
40
#
11
0
7
253
59
42
5
r97
25
53
69
TOTAIJS......77 52,370,348 74 i2,43t,130 1s $3,693,455 312 i20,t21,730 288 $13,351,014 143 945,7AA,]-49
4/30/02 15:3 9:41
I
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
April 30,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value '/a ol
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturlty 360 Equlv.
YTM
365 Equiv.
YTMlnvestmentsValue
LAIF & County Pool
CORP NOTES
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
19,971,822.11
3,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
19,971,822.11
3,072,500.00
13,176,250.00
19,971,822.11
3,027,780.00
13,000,000.00
55.48
8.41
36.11
1
1,596
1,700
1
456
1,221
3.091
5.929
5.354
3.1 34
6.011
5.428
35,971,822.11 36,220,572.11 35,999,602.,t1 100.00%749 480 4.147 4.204
Total Earnlngs April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CurrentYear 119,810.01
Average Daily Balance 32,629,219J14
Effective Rate of Return 4.47o/o
Pursuant to State law, there are sufftcient available funds to meet Burlingame,s
1,428,797.57
34,5',|1,582.41
4.97Yc
expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas
DIR./TREASURER
Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital
f-/3-o>--
Projects, and Enterprise funds).
RAHN A.
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRLPMl ) SymRept V5.02f
Run Oate: 05/1012002 - 08:35
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Average
Balance
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
April 30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
Book Valuo Rate Moody'sMarket Value
YTM Days to
365 Maturlty
Page 2
Maturity
Date
LAIF & County Pool
77
79
LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.
S M COUNW POOL
Subtotal and Average
10,980,837.40
8,990,984.71
10,980,837.40
8,990,984.71
10,980,837.40
8,990,984.71
2.760
3.590
2.760
3.590
18,601,499.{4 19,571,822.11 19,971,8zni1 15,571,822.11 3.134
CORP NOTES
0739028M9
37042R2C5
4E7
€9
BEAR STEARNS CORP
GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP
Subtotal and Average
03/0?J19s9
04/2011999
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,067,500.00
1,005,000.00
1,997,500.00
1,030,2E0.00
6.150
6.750
6.1 79
5.685
671 03t0212004
40 0ahot2002
3,027,780.00 3,000,000,00 3,072,5{)0.00 3,027,780,00 6.011 456
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3 l 331 LKK3
3l33MSTS4
3133M7Y75
3133MF2D9
3133MLMH5
3136F0Y29
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FANNIE MAE
Subtotal and Average
499
476
4EE
49E
50s
502
06t13t2001
03l/17/1998
o3122'.!999
05/24t2001
o2t26t2002
o8t28t2001
2,000,000.00
'1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,008,740.00
1,029,370.00
2,093,120.00
2,004,380.00
2,006,880.00
4,033,760.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5.800
6.020
6.000
5.630
4.000
5.420
5.800
6.020
6.000
5.630
4.0O2
5.420
'1,504
320
691
1,484
940
1,580
06/13ii2006
0311712003
03t22t2004
05124t2006
1112612004
0812812006
13,000,000.00 13,000,000,00 13,178,250.00 13,000,000.00 5.428 1,21
Total lnvostments and Average 32,625,275.14 35,971,822,11 s8,220,572.11 35,999,602.1 {4,204 tl80
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMz) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35
1
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity By Type
April 1,2002 through April 30,2002
Page 3
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Beglnnlng
Balance
Stated
Rate
Transactlon
Datc
Purchases
or Deposlts
Sales/Maturities
or Wlthdrawals
Endlng
Balance
LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary)
77 LOCALAGENCY INV.FD.
79 SMCOUNWPOOL
Subtotal
2.760
3.590
3,564,836.07
1,829,031.28
0.00
0.00
14,577,5v.76 5,393,867.35 0.00 15,971,822.11
CORP NOTES
Subtotal 3,027,780,00 3,027,780.00
Federal Agency lssues . Coupon
Subtotal 13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00
Total 30,605,734.70 5,393,867.35 0,00 35,9S9,602.1 1
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02f
/
Run Oate: 05/10i2002 - 08:35
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activity Summary
April 2001 through April 2002
Yield to Maturlty
Page 4
Month Number of
Securltles
Total
lnvasted
300
Equlvalent Equlvalent
Number
of Securltles
Purchaced
Number
of SecuriUes
Matured / Sold
Average
Torm
Average
OaW to Maturlty
Managed
Pool305EndYearRate
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
Aprll
2001
2001
200'l
2001
2001
200't
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
14
14
13
15
14
15
12
12
12
11
11
10
10
37,255,372.54
38,758,088.25
36,085,177.06
38,447,819.42
38,002,167.'.t2
34,930,381.22
32,614,594.78
33,056,179.95
35,671,743.12
34,732,791.56
32,802,148.94
30,605,734.76
35,999,602.11
5.737
5.609
5,431
5.396
5.287
s.352
4.880
4.812
4.629
4.497
4.441
4.419
4.'.t47
5.817
5.687
5.507
5.471
5.361
5.426
4.948
4.879
4.694
4.559
4.503
4.480
4.204
5.417
5.200
4.767
4,632
4.4U
4.214
3.809
3.683
3.474
3.232
3.237
3.317
3.134
931
948
989
1,047
1,089
1,289
1,028
1,014
940
928
933
880
749
1
1
1
2
1
,|
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
671
695
764
817
860
1,020
791
763
691
662
658
580
480
Average 13 35,304,753.99 4.972%5.04',t%4.046 11 982 727
Portfolio GITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM4) SymRspt V5.04
turn Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Distribution of lnvestments By Type
April 2001 through April 2002
Page 5
Aprll May
2001 2001
June
2001 2001
AprllJulyAugust Soptembor2001 2o0l
October November December2001 2001 2001
January February2002 2002
March
2002 2002
Average
by Perlodlnvestment Type
LAIF & Gounty Pool 42.4 41.9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 45.0 47.6 55.5 425%
Gertificates of Deposit . Bank
Certificates of Deposit - S & L
Gertificates of &Ln
Negotlable CD's - Bank
CORP NOTES 8.1 7.8 8.4 7.9 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 9.9 8.4 8.6%
Bankers Acceptances
Gommerclal Paper - lnterest Bearing
Commerclal Paper -Discount
Federal Agency lssues .Coupon 49.5 50.3 51.3 55.9 53,9 64.4 49.1 48,4 44.9 43.2 45.7 42.5 36.1 48.90/"
Federal Agency lssues - Dlscount
Treasury Securlties .Coupon
Treasury Securities - Discount
Miscellaneous Securities -Coupon
Miscellaneous Securities . Discount
Non lnterest Bearing lnvestments
Morlgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 2
Mlscellaneous Discounts -At Gost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM5) SymRept V5.02f
Run Oate:05/10/2002 - 08:35
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnterest Earnings Summary
April30,2002
April 30 Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date
Page 6
GD/Goupon/Dlscount lnvestments:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Eamings during Period
33,750.00
192,098.33
151 ,173.33)
0.00)
(
1,116,900.00
192,098.33
337,083.33)
0.00)
74,675.00
0.00
971 ,915.00
1,250.00
74,675.00 973,165.00
Pass Through Securlties:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Eamed during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Period
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
Gash/Checking Accounts:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
lnterest Earned during Period
12s,892.95
3't3,812.44
394,570.38)
567,540.24
313,812.44
425,720,11)
45,135.0'l 455,632.57
Tota! Interest Earned durlng Period
Total Gapltal Galns or Losses
119,810.01
0.00
1,427,ill.57
1,250.00
Run Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM6) SymRept V5.02f
Total Earnlngs durlng Perlod 119,810.01 1,428,797,57
(
((
(
(
(
(
((
!
I
lnvestments
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
Apri!30,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value
t/t ol
Portfollo Term
Da]6 to
Maturlty
YTM
360 Equlv,
YTM
365 Egulv.Value
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 100.00 502 4.995 5.064
800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 502 4.995 5.064
Total Earnlngs April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available
3,416.67
802,000.00
5.18%
funds to meet Burlingame's
34,166.67
802,000.00
5.',|2c/o
expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax,Trust & Agency funds, Capital
r-,3 aL Projects, and Enterprise funds).
Rahn Becker, Finance
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PMI) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date: 05/10/2002 . 08:36
1,756
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Average
Balance
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
April30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Days to
365 Maturlty
Page 2
Maturlty
Date
LAF
79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD.
Subtotal and Average
5.707
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3133M5Q89 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average
111241199A 800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 5.125 5.064 502 09/15/2003
5.064 502802,000.00 800,000.00 823,496,00 802,000.00
Total lnvestments and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 823,498.00 802,000.00 5.064 fiz
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date;05'/10/2002 - 08:36
lnvestments Par
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
April 30,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
o/o ol
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
360 Equiv,
YTM
365 Equiv.Value
Federal Agency Coupon Sscurities
lnvestments
1 ,710,000.00 1,761,E30.10 '1,710,000.00 100.00 1,824 329 5.977 6.060
1,710,000.00 't,761,830.10 1,710,000,00 100.00% 1,826 329 5.977 6.060
Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Cunanr Y€ar A,4q.7A 86,446.67
Av.r.g. p.llyB.l.nc. 1,710,000.00 1J10,000.00
Efi.cdv. Rat of R.trm !.01!t 6.0l
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
.9{3-ar
RAHN BECKER,Director/Treasurer
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.04Run Date: 05i10/2002 . 08:37
I
I
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
April30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
BookValue Rate Moody's
Page 2
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Average
Balance Market Value
YTM Days to
305 Maturity
Maturlty
Date
Managed Pool Accounts
EO LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND
Subtotal and Avsrage
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124 1
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Federal Agency Goupon Securlties
3133M3XE0 478 03/2611 998 1,710,000.00 1,761,830.10
Subtotal and Average 1,710,000.00 {,710,000.00 1,761,830.10 1,7{0,000.00
1,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 329 03t2612003
6.060 329
Total lnvortments and Average 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,761,830.{ 0 1,710,000.00 6.080 329
Portfolio 98BD'cP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f
Run Date: 05/10/2002 - 08:37
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
"t
i
Par
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
April 30,2002
Market
Value
Book
Value
o/o ol
Portfollo Term
Days to
Matuilty
YTM
300 Equlv.
YTM
365 Equiv.lnvestments Value
Managed Pool Accounts
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
6,753,305.63
1,100,000.00
6,753,305.63
1,109,625.00
8,753,305.63
1,100,000.00
85.99
14.O1
1
1,826
1
1,567
2.722
5.474
2.760
5.550
7,E53,305.63 7,862,930.63 7,853,305.63 100.00%257 220 3.108 3.151
Total Earnings April 30 Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date
CuEBnrYoff 23,069.74 UO,7O1.2O
Ava6g€ D.llyB.lanc. E,7E3,730.16
EtL.rlv. Rlt otR.tum 329ry.
Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise tunds).
{-13*o7
Rahn Becker,Dir.ffreasurer
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 05/102002 - 0E:38
CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer
Average
Balance
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfollo Details - lnvestments
Apri!30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
Statsd
BookValue Rate
YTM Daysto
386 Maturlty
YTM Maturity
Date380
Managed Poo! Accounts
81 Local Agency lnv. Fd
Subtotal and Average
08/0s/2001 6,753,305.63 6,753,305.83 6,753,305.63 2.740 2.722 2.760
7,083,730.16 6,75:t,305.63 6,753,305.63 6,753,305.63 2.742 2.760
Federal Agency Coupon Securltles
3133MGQR0 503 Fedsral Hom6 Loan Bank
Subtotal and Average
o8115t2001 1,100,000.00 't,109,625.00 1,100,000.00 5.550 5.474 5.550 1,567 08/15/2006
1,r00,000.00 5.474 5.550 1,567I,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,109,625,00
Total lnvestments and Average 8,783,739.16 7,853,305.63 7,862,930.03 7,853,305.63 3.108 3.151 220
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 05/1 0/2002 - 08:3E
Page2
Page 1 ofl
GLK-Musso, Ann
From: Rob Paratte [rparatte@mindspring.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 1 1 ,2002 8:43 AM
To: mcffy@aol.com; rosalieomahoney@earthlink.net; cathyb@baylock.com;
Cc: amusso@burlingame.org; sparatte
Subject: Safeway Expansion
The Paratte Family
2612 Hale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Phone 340-8414Fax 340-1719
Members of the City Council
I am writing to you to express our concern about Safeway's proposed massive expansion and the impact it will
have on our City's character. ln think Safeway's plans are ridiculous and will forever change, in a negative way,
the look and feel of Burlingame Avenue. Consider that we already have Mollie Stone's next store and the fact that
Mollie Stone's is appropriately sized for the surrounding neighborhood.
By way of background I make my living in the commercial real estate business, our firm specializes in urban infill
development so I write this with a bias toward private enterprise and development. I feel that a 70,000 square
foot Safeway at Howard and El Camino violates every principal of sound urban planning.
I think they should either remodel in the space they have or sell the parcels they have assembled so that
numerous small retail stores can be built on the sites as opposed to a blockbuster like they have planned
I shudder to think what a massive Safeway facade will do to the look and feel of pedestrian friendly Primrose and
the small businesses located there.
Please don't let Safeway proceed
A. Robert Paratte
5/t312002
DISTRIBUTION:
h7 // zzaz
{1
7"*',
kurnl
rtv*rt"ru*.b
XCitv Council
I citu Munun.,
Y ci,v e,,oni.y
Dir. Finance
p City Planner
Dir. Public Works
- Human Resources
I Police Chiel
:l Fire Chief'I Parks & Rec
i Librarian
l1/WW PleaseresPond
No n.r(nr. Required
Pn
Next neenda
,Our/on7*-,*, ;:/
& fy'*a
>{o: ifuqtrs"Z ,J,,y'*7
3/d /? l^- 7La7P-t olo ?b f/" ft"f"t/ /
ph4-. *, /ai/ar/ * * fu?rrrio /4"/
,/,-//{. /@7
tr%d Z.r** *brUAr-l p.ru o r,-e
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF
YOUR RESPONSE TO THE
CITY CLERK
*" ry 4 -rrza-ct / r/" q, ry ry : f4 4z?t?-44'
Xa.Vo. ;r*frrr*fu Lz4z ?/*;:br; g**L fr,y /he///-rl.t ***
,er/
e rtd*F
/z,urr'rk,
A,2b
,4,4-.
a
GLK-Musso, Ann
To:
Subject:
cathyb@baylock.com
RE: Safeway Expansion
- -- - -Original Message- - - - -
From: Terry Earlywine [mailto:terry@earlywinedesign.com]Sent: Tuesday, May 1-4, 2OO2 9:37 AMTo: mcffy@aoI. com; rosalieomahoney@earthlink.neti cathyb@baylock. com,-
maryj anney@aol . com
SubjecE: Safeway Expansion
Members of t.he Cit.y Council:
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen and business owner here inBurringame about safewayts proposed expansion and the impact it wil-l-have on our City's character.
why do we need another poorly designed structure. we will have had Losuffer for years with the mistakes of letting the"design trends', ofthe time eg. 50s, 50s and 7os rule over what reaIIy makes our citycharming. The older L0s, 20s, and 30s archit,ectural st,yle . A great
example of what can be done would be the new library. Fake fasadesand pre formed, retro embellishments just don't work. If you aregoing to take up such a massive area (?o,ooo square feet) you shouldconsider making it. a pleasant experj-ence for the public. Opencourt.yard, European market place, or Mediterranean st.yIe with largetrees interspersed. This may be more expensj-ve up front, but wourdprobably draw more people to shop and thus be more profitable foryears to come.
Please consider the people of Burlingame DISTRIBUTION:
Thank You, (CityCouncit
ftiry fr4rnrg".Terry Earlywine f6iti a,to,r.y
- Dir. Finance(fity ptanncrr Dir. publrc works
- Human Resources
i police Chief-r Fire Chief
krleaseresPond
-FNext esenoa
Terry Earlywine
Earlywine Design LLC
L427 CasBillo Ave
Burlingame CA 9401-0-5553Tel 550-348-1483
Fax 650 -348-2036
terry@earlywinedes ign . com
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF
YOUR RESPONSE TO THE
CITY CLERK
1
u"c!^A
-,-
=ATsilBroadbandPO. Box 5147
San Ramon, CA 94583
April25,2002
Mr. Rahn Becker
Assistant City Manager
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA. 9401C
Dear Mr. Becker:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a programming adjustment being made to
AT&T Broadband's cable seruices in the City of Burlingame. The change will be effective
on May 29,2002.
AT&T Broadband will be adding channel 77- Preview Channel to the channel line-up.
This addition will not result in a modification of the current cable television rates.
Please contact Kathi Noe at (650) 631-0191 extension 375 with any questions that you
may have regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Mitzi Givens
Kathi Noe
AT&T Broadband
Director of Government Affairs and Franchising
West Bay- Peninsula Area
KN/mg
-@^EP Recycled Paper