Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.05.20BURLINGAME CITY COIJNCIL AGENDA Rncu,AR MBsrNc - MoNoav, MAv 20, 2002 Pecs 1 or 3 .i. CLOSED SESSION: Threatened Litigation (Government Code $ 54956.9(bX1), (3XC)) Claim of Carl Retter Claim of Thomas & Adrienne Jones I. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. MINUTES - Meeting of May 6,2002 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS Theaayormaylinitswakels tothremiauteseach Weeds & rubbish abatement of private property, Public Hearing and approval of Resolution b. Adopt an Ordinance to install a stop sign on Sebastian Drive at Arguello Drive to provide a three-way stop intersection c, Adopt an Ordinance deieting one-hour parking and establishing two-hour parking, the east side of Carolan Avenue from Cadillac Way to Broadway PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency opell meetlng law) prohibrts council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 6. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS c. Transmittal of Proposed Budget d. Construction hours and enforcement e. Introduction of Ordinance Second Unit Amnesty extension for up to four (4) years f. l) Adopt Resolution setting time limits for parking in city lots F and H, and 2) Introduce an Ordinance to grant authority to Burlingame a. 5 City of Bwlingame CITY HALL. 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 SUGGffSYWD ACWON 6:45 p.m., Conf Room A Immediately following joint meeting with Burlingame School District Board of Trustees Approval Hearing/Action Heanng/Action Hearing/Action Discussion Discussion Introduce 1) Adopt 2) Introduce 7 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RBcur,AR Msuruqc - Mouoev, MAY 20, 2002 PAGE 1 oF 3 Police Department to tow vehicles from city parking lots g. Consider Introduction of Ordinance amending the massage permit requirements to allow the release of the surety bond followrng24 consecutive months of lawful operation under the permit CONSENT CALENDAR - Items on the Consent Calendar are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action are requested by a council member. a. Resolution Accepting Washington Park Ballfield Renovation by Scapes Landscape, Inc. b. Resolution awarding a construction contract to Trinet Construction, Inc. for the California/Grove Area Stom Drain Pump Station c. Resolution accepting improvements for Broadway Streetscape North Side, 1190 to 1454 Broadway, to J.J.R. Construction d. Resolution awarding South Broadway Streetscape improvements , 1190 to 1454 Broadway, to J.J.R. Construction, and Resolution approving transfer of funds to Broadway Streetscape budget e. Resolution approving agreement fbr design services with Nolte Associates for the Hyatt pump station reconstruction f. Tentative & final parcel map for lot combination, lots I thru 4,6,IJ thru22, block 4, Town of Burlingame, i310-1316 Bayswater Avenue and l2l Park Road (St. Catherine's Church) g. Warrants and Payroll, April2002 h. Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Agreement with BFI Regarding On-call Cleanup Program i. 1) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to file State Revolving Fund Loan application and accompanying documents for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements 2) Resolution identifying and dedicating the sewer system use charges to repayment of the state revolving fund loans, Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Agreement between City of Burlingame and the Peninsula YMCA Allowing Burlingame Residents use of the Skatepark Operated by the YMCA and the City of Millbrae J City of Bwlingame CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 Introduce Approve City of Budingame CITY HALL - 501 PRI\4ROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Rpcr-n en Mnprnqc - Motloev, MAY 20, 2002 PAGE 1 oF 3 k. Resolution of Intention to approve Broadway Area Business Improvement District, Setting 2002103 Assessments 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, May 2,2002; Planning, May 13, 2002 b. Department Reports: Building, Apnl,2002; Finance, April 30, 2002 c. Letter from Rob Paratte, Teny Earlywine, and Mrs. A Erickson, regarding proposed Safeway expansion d, Letter from AT&T Bloadband conceming channel change to cable service 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations 1br disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least 24 hours befbre the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available tbr public review at the City Clerk's otllce, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at Www.bUflUgarng.ol& Agendas and minutes are available at this site or listen iive on our LIVE365 Broadcast via the website. NEXT MEETING - June 3,2002 ) 3. 4. BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JoIxTMEETING wIrH BUnI,INGAME ScuooI Dlsrrucr Boano orTRusrnes, MoNoAy, MAy 20, 2002 Pacn I or'1 1. CALL TO ORDER (Mayor Janney) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL (Mayor Janney/President Hinshaw) CEREMONIAL a. Presentation of Proclamation to Eagle Scout Cooper Goorie & Marcus Grijalva from ASM Troop 10 (Mayor Janney) b. Presentation of Proclamation to Jesse Moore, Burlingame High School Senior, for receiving the AT&T Wireless Award at the Family Service Agency of San Mateo County Breakfast (Mayor Janney) c. lntroduction of new Burlingame High School Principal, Matthew Biggar (Superintendent Mohr) d. Report from Superintendent Sonny DaMarto and Mayor Mary Janney on their goodwill trip to China (DaMarto/Janney) PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to reler such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. The Mayor may limit speakers lo three minutes each. 6. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilifies, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy ofthe Agenda Packet is available for public review at the city clerk's office, city Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at rvrvrv.burliuqame.ors. Agendas and minutes are available at this site or listen live on our LIVE365 Broadcast via the website. City of Burlingame CIry HALL - 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O (6s0) ss8-7200 $U_QoEJiTEDA,EA9N 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Presentation Presentation Presentation Discussion 5. BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES Regular Meeting of May 6,2002 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:A0 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAI\CE TO THE FLAG Led by Randy Schwartz. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: Council Absent: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony None 4. MINUTES Councilman Galligan requested the minutes the April 15,2002, Council Meeting be amended to insert the following statement to item 7c) Appoint Planning Commissioners: He requested that it read, "if at some time a commissioner feels they can no longer work professionally with the Council or Commission and respect differences of opinion, then the commissioner should resign or expect the City Council to suggest that they step down. My support of any commissioner would be in the belief that he would have the full support of the Council if a commissioner is not respectful of differences of opinion." Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular Council meeting of April 15,2002; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a, Reintroduction of an Ordinance for a zoning code amendment for new construction building size in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadwav commercial areas and change to zoning action expiration CP Monroe stated that the proposed Ordinance will limit the size of the first floor footprint of new construction of commercial uses in subarea A of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Diskict and of the Broadway Commercial District greater than 6,000 square feet in the Burlingame Avenue area and greater than 5,000 square feet in the Broadway area. Expiration of Planning Approvals will be valid for two years with no extensions. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes I May 6,2002 Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney representing Joe Karp, spoke regarding conditional use permits. Councilwoman O'Mahony moved that this item be tabled and reviewed by staff; seconded by Councilman Galligan. Vice Mayor Coffey commented for the record that he does not own a commercial building in Burlingame and would not need to recuse himself from this matter. Motion approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. a.Broadway Area Business Improvement District - Setting 2002/03 Assessments These assessments generate approximately $25,000.00 a year for use in enhancing the Broadway area's competitiveness as a retail area. The merchants have also indicated an interest in assisting with the Broadway Streetscape Improvements that are over budget. Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Broadway Area Business Improvement District 2002103 Assessments; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Dijonne Marcelino, 391 Third Avenue, Daly City and Steven Angelis, South San Francisco, spoke regarding Unity 2000. Rich Grogan, 1450 Columbus Avenue spoke concerning freedom of speech. Sam Malouf,Tl2 Vemon Way spoke conceming the Safeway expansion. Charles Yoltz,725 Yemon Way, spoke concerning the proposed amendment to the leaf blower Ordinance. Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road spoke concerning the Safeway expansion. 6. STAFF REPORTS AI\D COMMUNICATIONS Future Use of the propertv at 30I Airnort Boulevard CP Monroe stated the 488,000 square ft. office complex will mostly likely not be built and the planning approval will expire on August 7,2002. Question remains what type of development should be allowed at that site. Under current zoning and general plan designation, there are a variety of land uses choices for this site. Attorney Mark Hudak addressed Council on behalf of Glenborough Partners and proposed that the site be used for housing; presented a plan for 500 units, one-to-three bedroom town houses and flats which would include 30 to 40 affordably priced homes for city employees. Councilmembers agreed to look at alternative uses for the site, which could include a convention center, retail, development. Housing would be another altemative but it would not generate tax revenue and would need to be reviewed in terms of schools, police protection, sewer lines, etc. Amending the bayfront specific area plan would take about ayeff and would cost approximately $100,000 in consultant fees and staff time to prepare a document that would address the potential land uses for the area. The council was in consensus that Alternative B be studied to address all the concerns. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes M:ay 6,2002 2 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Janneymoved to Item 7e of the agenda. e.Consider request to revise Massage Permit Ordinance regarding posting of permit bond Council asked to consider the request of Elizabeth Graham for temporary relief from the $10,000 surety bond required to operate her business. Ms. Graham is requesting this relief or reduction of the amount of surety bond as she has been unable to work due to a physical disability. Staff was directed to review the option of removing the requirement of a surety bond if after a period of time the business has been successful, there are no issues with the police department, and that the business prove to be credible. troduce Ordin Police emplovees with the California Public Emplovees'Retirement Svstem (CALPERS) and the City of Burlineame Recommend Council approve Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to CALPERS retirement system and review proposed Ordinance to amend the City of Burlingame's contract with CALPERS retirement system to provide the police employees with the following benefit enhancements: Section 2136l.l -3% @55 Formula and Section 21024 Military Service Credit for Public Service. Mayor Janney requested Deputy City Clerk Weber read the title of the Ordinance. Councilman Galligan made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote 5-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Jarurey directed Deputy City Clerk Weber publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five before proposed adoption. Introduce an Ordinance to install a stop sign on Sebastian Drive at Arguello Drive to provide a three-wav stop intersection At the March 14,2002 and April 11,2002, the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered a petition from residents to install stop signs on all three legs of the intersection at Sebastian Drive and Arguello Drive. Staff examined the intersection and determined that stop sign warrants were not met based on vehicular right-of-way, speed and accidents. However, due to a sharp cresting of Arguello Drive immediately east and adjacent to the roadway, staff recommends that these stop signs be installed to improve safety. Mayor Jarurey requested Deputy City Clerk Weber read the title of the Ordinance. Councilman Galligan made a motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilman Galligan made a motion to introduce the proposed Ordinarrce; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney directed Deputy City Clerk Weber publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes J May 6,2002 8. a. CONSENT CALENDAR Special Event Requests for 2002 - Chamber of Commerce EA Weber requested Council approve the requests made by the Chamber of Commerce for the Burlingame Avenue Merchants Association Sidewalk Sale, Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival, holiday decorations and Burlingame Avenue Area Holiday Open House. b.Special Event Permit - Use of Pershing Park. Saturday. Julv 13. 2002. Avon Breast Cancer 3- Day WaIk Arlltatiqu EA Weber requested Council approve special event application for use of Pershing Park as an aid station for the Avon Breast Cancer 3-day walk on Saturday, July 13, 2002 from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. c.Tentative and Final Parcel Map for lot combination. Lgts 18 through 20. Block 14, Burlingame Grove, 116{ Broadway DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve the tentative and final parcel map for lot combination, lots l8 through 20, Block 14, Burlingame Grove, 1160 Broadway. d.Adoption of Resolution #43-2002 Fixins the Emplover's Contribution Under the Public Emplovees'Medical and llospital Care Act DHR Bell requested Council approve Resolution #43-2002 increasing the City's contribution towards medical premiums effective January 1,2002 for employees and annuitant covered by the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Burlingame and the Police Officers' Association (POA). e.Adoption of Resolution#44-2002 to approve lease modification for Federal Aviation Administration, Windshear Alert System DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Resolution #44-2002 to approve the lease modification with the Federal Aviation Administration @AA) for the Windshear Alert System. f. ddopt Resolution f*45-2002 application to applv for Grant Funds for the Roberti-Z'Bere-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks. Clean Water. Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. DPR Schwartz requested Council adopt Resolution #45-2002 approving the application for Roberti-Z'Berg- Harris funds under the Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. g. Adoption Resolution #46-2002 Acceptinq CalifornidGrove storm Drain Improvement Proiect. Phase 2 DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt Resolution #46-2002 accepting the CalifomialGrove Storm Drain Improvement Project, Phase 2, in the amount of $868,027.82. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes4 May 6,2002 h. Adoption of Resolution *f47-2002 accepting Trenton PIav Area Renovation - Citv Proiect #80140 DPR Schwartz recommended Council adopt Resolution #47-2002 accepting as complete the work done by Lone Start Landscape, Inc. at the Trenton Play Area. i. Approval of Contract with Design, Communitv and Environment for Consulting Services to Prepare a Planning Studv and Specific Area Plan for the North End of Burlingame j.Annointment of Svstem Board Member CL Escoffier recorlmended Jane Dunbar as Burlingame's representative to the Peninsula Library System, System Advisory Board for a two-year term, serving from July 1,2002 go June 30,2004. k. Resuest to Serve Alcohol at Library Foundation Function CL Escoff,rer recommended Council approve the serving of alcoholic beverages at the Burlingame Foundation Fundraiser to be held in the public areas of the Main Library on Saturday, October 19,2002, from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. l. Investment Policv for 2002 ACM Becker requested Council approve the Investment Policy for 2002. m. Authorize Citv Attornev to Join in Amicus Curiae Brief in Citv of Calsbad vs. Baker. Case No. D019112. at no cost to Citv CA Anderson requested Council authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to the City in City of Carlsbad vs. Baker, which is now pending before the California Court of Appeals. n. Authorize Citv Attornev to Join in Amicus Curiaq Brief in Metropolitan Water District vs.. Superior Court (Cargill). Case No. 8148446. at no cost to Citv CA Anderson requested Council authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to City in Metropolitan Water District vs. Superior Court (Cargill), which is now pending before the California Supreme Court. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee 10. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes they each attended on behalf of the City. 5 NfDD May 6,2002 CP Monroe requested Council adopt Resolution #48-2002 to approve agreement for preparation of a specific area plan for the north end of Burlingame with Design, Community and Environment and adopt Resolution #49-2002 to approve the transfer of funds. 11. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 12. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees, March 19,2002; Traffic, Safety and Parking, April l l, 2002; Planning, Apil 22, 2002 b. Department Reports: Police, March 2002 c.Letter from Patricia Gray concerning affordable housing in Burlingame d. Letter from N. Carol Davis, Wichita, KS to Rahn Becker thanking him for assisting with transportation to hotel e. Letter from AT&T Broadband concerning programming changes f. Memorandum from DPW Bagdon concerning sewer and water infrastructure program press conference onMay 13,2002 Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 10:02 p.m. in memory of Police Dog Kai, partner of Officer Jeff Downs, and former police employee, Lilian Saint Julien. Respectfu lly submitted, Ann T. Musso City Clerk Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes6 May 6,2002 I STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM #4a MTG. DATE 5t20to2 TO: DATE: FROM HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED MAY 8, 2002 APPROVED PUBLIC WORKS BY BY SUBJECT: WEEDS AND RUBBISH ABATEMENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY - PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION - CITY JOB NO. 80610 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing to receive any objections to proposed weed and rubbish removal and approve a resolution "Ordering the Destruction of Noxious and Dangerous Weeds and Rubbish a Nuisance in the City of Burlingame." BACKGROUND: Each year the City establishes the Weed and Rubbish Abatement Program. As part of the program, Council declared weeds and rubbish a nuisance on April L, 2002. Since then, staff has surveyed the City and posted properfy which requires abatement. The Public Works Director will have a list of all posted properties available at the time of the hearing. After Council approves the resolution, staff will notiff the affected property owners by certified mail as to the deadline for weed and rubbish removal. All unabated nuisances will be addressed by a city contractor and a lien will be placed on the property to recover the removal expenses. EXHIBITS: Resolution; Sample Posting Notice Syed City P.E (650) ss8-7230 c: City Clerk pa S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reporu\WEED.STF RESOLUTION NO. ORDERING THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS AND DANGEROUS WEEDS AND RIJBBISH A NIIISANCE IN THE CITY OF BI.'RLINGAME RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Burlingame on April l, 2002, at a regular meeting of said Council, adopted a resolution declaring certain weeds growing upon various streets, squares, lanes, alleys, avenues, coutrs and places within said municipality, and upon private property within said municipality, which said weeds bear seeds of a wingy or downy nature and are otherwise obnoxious and dangerous, and all rubbish, refuse and dirt upon parkways, sidewalks or private property, to constitute a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, said resolution fixed Monday, the 20't day of May, 2002, at the hour of seven p.m. of said day, at the City Council Chambers of the City of Burlingame, located in the City Hall of said City, as the time and place when objections to the proposed removal of such weeds shall be heard and given due consideration; and WHEREAS it appears that notice of said hearing has been given for the time and in the manner and form provided by law; and WHEREAS, it appears that no objections to the proposed removal of such weeds were presented; 1 t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame that the City Engineer of the City of Burlingame be, and he hereby is directed to remove and eradicate such weeds as described in the Resolution of Intention passed and adopted on April 1, 2N2. AND said City Engineer of said City of Burlingame is hereby authorized and directed to fix the costs of such removal and eradication of weeds, and in the event of any delinquency of the payment of said costs to report the same to the City Clerk of the City of Burlingame so that the costs may be collected in the manner provided by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of _ , 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS S:\A Public Works DiIecIoryWIISCELLA\WEEDDEST.RES 2 City Clerk TO REMOVE WEEDS AND RUBBISH Notice is hereby given that on the lst day of April,2O02, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of the City of Burlingame, Chapter 11.08 (Ordinance No. 469), the City Council of said City passed Resolution No. 31-2002 declaring that all weeds growing or rubbish existing upon any private property or in any public street or alley, of such character as to be a fire menace or otherwise noxious or dangerous, constitute a public nuisance and must be abated by destruction or removal thereof. Notice is further given that propert5r owners shall, withoutdelay, destroy and remove all such weeds or rubbish from their properly and the abutting one-half of the street in front and alley, if any, behind such property and between the lot lines extended and maintain a clean condition continuously throughout the year; or such weeds and rubbish will be destroyed and the nuisance removed by the City, in which case the cost of destruction or removal will be assessed upon the land from which, or from the front or rear of which, such weeds or rubbish shall have been destroyed or removed; and such cost will constitute a lien upon such land until paid, and will be collected upon the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected. All property owners having any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds or rubbish are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the Council of said City, to be held at the Council Chambers in the City Hall in said City, May 20,20ff2 at 7:00 P.M., when and where objections will be heard and given due consideration. TTIE CITY OF BI]RLINGAME Syed Murtuza, City Engineer Dated: April lo,2m/2 S:\A hrblic lYorks Direcrory\l{ISCELLA\WEED.NTlC WEEDS AND RI]BBISII ABATEMENT LOCATIONS OF NOTICES POSTED JOB NO.80610 LOCAT/ON5 OF WEED.' ABAtEY/E/ f Nof/CE^I P.lsfED tra 5-2o-oL RE-M]I"EZ5 Dat/.2rtt' ,VA,CAN 7 VkepT t/AcAPf /aZ UMAPT LaT I 2 4 5 6 s l.ul.\(ns \ N N N \ \ s S $t \ Q\ S at \{l\ \ ss N $ N -\ ,s H Ns{ N B(A N N N N s( l*'.e N \J-$) \\JLO-CA.T./ OM PAECEL NO, o/,x //x xVlCnNf bri p'Eftt/EEN /2ood /240 Epfs4orc, t/rctluaY o26-142-ozo o26-/42-o?o x xa/ro/ol Clt/.Qatl/a O&aE BoaLtuOeuE Faao /,x%o85 Cezttustte aeUe ,0580 eAA l,o7 il,X x79 cA//FoR^//A 24tL'E OSEo Ana /o 7 %,x x:CnA irarzaoe lor oN /lE Coil)Et o F ?ErtlQsoLa / Hrcltto,,to x/*/ Cpasro/a\cE Zo7 oP ftle. C an ttEl2 o F hafeyt lEz I H alU rtO 4//20 x (/6t hailnPo 4uElaE lAe sTop4ae /,oT /lo M ttllllIIIIIIII ft:h s,N h-. ttttttt I [)CAT/1NS 0F TVEEO-, Ats-4 /Vll[-f ^/oif/CE; PosfED MO: 5-Zo'oL REMA]ZK5 Clenaeo As oF 5-5-oz C/apu As atr f'/z-oz- U 7 ailOrNg ilentra 4s oF -O2 I q /o /l /Z t? q R,q\t K \ $ S N $ N \ N H N N B (A N H ft:h \ N N Nv h"e N $$t\ \..JPJEOEL No, N(ns \ N NLacA-nOtV x/* //o/ Hoanto t4 clENUr€. -( aN l/raltntt2 nuetloU) (4//zo x x/8/0 * /8/8 Ecz'( UAce,*tl Lo /5 ) %,X?ta m1/e6/ Eatz x%,8 zt rtlqlub fla,+o xa/qo 27 mplutn ,uno x x/ztgfi ////{c/tE/ ,rZop 4//(/6/6 dqBeeil &oeo C/aaveo As ol l-/z'az IIIIIIII N \ \ s s $ \ \t $ s X I I I ttttlt IOCAT/ON, OF I,VEEO-' Afr-nf5tlE f //07/CE-5 P.19rEO [0i 5-ZoOL REMZ'8R"5 As of 5-/$'dZ l/eaaeq A.s aE /z-az c/eeaaz ,4s aF .{-/Z-oZ C/enae0 4S 5'/2,'a- cikapeo As ap 5-/2.o2 3 44 4t LO.CA.T"JOM PAECEL NO, N(Asq. N N .N \ \ St u \lirt 5r s a R,q { K =$ S N $ R ,s H N N B(A N N l-. R N \rtt$t \\J u Nv Ze/B 845/at/ 4Eila{f/zt x x x 2/04 ,/rt/trae 23UA %t x x ( /o43 OpUa Arc,uae a/,x x %t Y x x/r2g o4t93t 4OrglaA %,x X/ /25 cnap/ao llaraa a/,x X X I/?+B O,AG l/&t/a{_ i %?x x *.x/4r3 Baatil fuEt/(/E IIIIIIII ftrh\,NI.\ IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-' AHn fE/VEltl f //0 f/ CE- e Pls fEO W: 5 -2o-oz REMARKS &ze,uei.ct aF eZ a/aopeo 4s oF 5-9'az aF 5-5'az fuuea As aF/-/z-az Ck:eilEo ,+S aF 5-5-AZ €4lPa2 ,45 arc 5'5'aZ 60 5/ 5z ,3 5s LO-CA-T" /ON PAECEL /,1O. N $ N N .N \ \ os S $t(t $* s atq { K =ss N H N \\^ .ai H }- N N B $ N ih \lN t". u Nv l''..e N s(r) \\J //o/ Dauo/ts %x x /ZZSdtbBBatOa //8.,b ><)( /73o filzao/a/o tfal %x X %X X/Zao Eoqr//rUOerUE /204 Pntn 0&uE fr,K x %a d I K/t/5 Satc//cz /te. 2B 6boaFt6e ,4artO a/o x x Y56 d/altteo As oF €y'|-oz lttttttlttttttt lrlt ltttttlrlt I IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-' AB-n Etlf_ tl T //0i r/cr_ e P1srED 96 ? 4o [0 76 , 5 -Zo -oZ "RE7VZZKS" Z/eaael ofi *-9a'o?- r Zltatr? ps aF 5-t2-oz C/sa,ueo lS aF 4-Z?aZ C/repaa ,4s aF -oz P-ApeEL No, Nhs. \ N N N \ \ s s $t li..t $ s atq {t\ \ $ S Nsr N s(A N N ,\ Q Nv t'.. a N s(rt \\.,LO_CA_r./ OM 224 2arclrAoeo /u Y x / I? Anwoel Eaao 4/zt I x x xB Loefarr,.l ,4U6UAE z//u x x/%x/ 00? D ilfrliloepe,4/E/ctE 4/b x x x/ta? /awee Aue,{ae X%/x x/5ze 6ttfutq ,U? xtitz Oru#at arl /%X K I frs oF -tr-/z -az It I tl N $ N \ N N ft: iu) \NI'\ LO-CA.T/OM PAEaEL No, N(ns \ N N .N \ \ s R atq { h- \ss N € N F N H l'- a N s !n) \\t N N B(A N N f,:h sr, N N Nv 5ot'h| lpn&*so naru{%o x K %x xqtu€36 0//6ta/E AuE, B 0a hoeaoil lUE,%o x K x 4/*X x xflar 4pPp64 PaE, x x855,857€ gt? ,Sozaps 4ono %o x x XVO flaZ/ttktoelttttE % /0o{ ralad 2eruE %o X /K [0 cA T/0N5 0F tl/EEO-f Ats n E/VE/IIT ilo VCE 5 P-1s fEO 57 56 6/ 6Z MO 6a 5-ZooZ RE'/t?A'Z/<3 €leapEo 4S of l-$-a Z AsaF 5-B'a z C/ZzpEP 4s o,€ €-B-dz c/e*teo AS oE €84L cat/e0 AS oF 5-8-aZ 63 lttrttrtttttttt ttt $ \ \ \ o\ s I [o: 4 6' 6 6s IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO.' ABI E Vf- /Y f //OT/CE- 5 P2sfED 66 5-Zo-OZ REMA-EK5 C/apeo A-saF €8-oz- d&auso A-s oE -e'/Z'oZ llEat6? 4s aF 5'/*a z cke,ua *s ot €4zaz 1/84uil 4S oF5-/242 _LO-CA_7:"./A.N PApcE-L Na, sNl.\ $ N N N \ \ s R $tl\ Q\ s qIq { h- \ $s N s N N \b\ N H N N B(A Ni N i ft: k) \, .N,'l -\\. u Nv l-'. e N sq \\J /O0o TlYarJ A&a€%.x x x ?// raloN DBru€././/3o x K x /357 qsawl Aud,5/x Y x /436 22afr *UE,/,X x x %x// /5 *qaru/hz ,4/8,x x I ?4{ a4//HA///A }ztyE 7r x )< t 6eS4sSappyg 2ptuL %X x7d 4s aF ,5-/7-oz- j I I I I MA [?CAT/1NS 0F TVEEO-, AB A E/tlErY- T //0' 7/ CE- 5 P-ls fED 7z 5'Zo-OZ R:EMA'ERS €ottw peuu€/huri Alattc EL€tntua 4cRnL laNO 6 fPurlE /+/a^r6 El €An*P a/aattEo 4s aF 5-/Z-az c/EApEo 45 oF 5-/?'OZ c/6it/6e ls or -f-/$-oL 'od4 ut \t s s aI<\ { K =s S N H N N R N H N N Bv\ nt N fr,N,.) \, ,Qllh:, .il Nv h- a N\tlll \\rLOCAT..IOM PAP1EL /,1o. SN!.\I \ N N N \ \ sa >l_ *X74o ELCtaruaPatL %x733 furi*heu ,€anP %60/ ltruF#Lo &to X x%XTooEl&ttttbSE*L b,//5 X// ?aE/ ceilno ?aee ,b X x x//tg ltcailr/e,AAE, x/475/ruaa/Nlue,%77 e efi*rEf) rttrrtllllllltr I MA: IOCAT/ON, OF I,VEEO.' Ats 0 EME/Y f //of/C€-i P1sfED 8z REMAZK"s PeutA rv{ ela}rc fIL ceeuuo &8n2,- a C/Etl/Eo A.s aF 5-/?'aZ A:Ea^,,F-P 4s aP €-/4'oZ A, h...e N s(rt \ lJ..JL.o-cA-nO.tV PAECE-L No, N s \ N N N \ \ -$as* $ \ \t $ s q Rq { K \\\) S N $ N F N H Nsr N B(A N N ft,hs NN a\ s Nv %X/3a8 El Aeltuua ruL % ^ Eta 671tuuab 0Ee, ><X/246 ELCentw aeaL % 5//7 /x/4oo El Cttrll/a Ednt V7 Xl4f7 - /4.{7EL €Atrlw RAU %x i.tno/, rSoZ O' /fds ,4 r/t--srda' oPtu€ x >< / 325 - /r27Ezcen*w @L 7 /q 4lttel III 5 -Zo-oz I I I I I [0 cA T/0N5 0F n/EEO-' mA ffllflll f //1f/CE- 5 P-lsfEO ffa E5 I ffi 5-20'O L RE-MV"/{K3 QzgsP lsal .fl?'az /*SdE 5y'2-a Z a|/ff8/{7 86 7a /ncar"./aN PAPCE-L No. N(ns \ N N N \ \ ss>t $ \ \ $ s N $ N ,\\r\ N H N S{ N B(A Ni N f: P) N,Nf'. \(n \.(l si Nv l-'. :a N \Jlrt \\J /3 2/ Et cifi/ra Eset ,h X X x V7 X/45 E/ dfrif/ilo r4eru %x X xB4t ,€rZrus fu*t x xZa6 fuirtlsule lug %x x x X?aa &fuvsot* &uE,% %)(4zt Ctot/laqnr/t Oe. /Szfennbnan 28.5/ //,x x x Cta4tt/e 4s oF 547-oZ IItIIIIIIII at \N K \s S I I I I f.OCA T/ONS OF I,I/EED-' ffi! Et1/E/!1 f //o f/ CE- 5 P-ls fED MO: Z 5-zo-o L "REMAAKS ClEnoE2 4s oF €-/*aZ clEtilEo ,as aF.*/?az 4l€AN€O 43 oF 5/?-dZ N H N N -\ *N H N N B (A N N ft: ws, .Q' F-, N Nv F.. R N $(rt \ \/acA_T_/oAl PAE'EL No, R s \ N N -N \ \ ..ss>t $t [- \ s s a R, \{ K =ss 5/ //,x x X/42/'44/tFaPa/4 22, x xV38Z/ tt//t/c/es7&a Ip. X74Xx/2/3 /,+Paa/raa fuA, II I IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO, AH-q Etl5r/ T //0r/ CE_ 5 P_os rEO tro: 5 -Zct -oz .REMA"]{K3 UncANf BUILO|tiQ, CleatEO As ot 4-2+-oZ c/aaaeg As oE f'f*az EZEqNEO 4s oF i-/ZQZ C/zauas SO 4 'OZ /5 /6 /8 /7 2o N(ns \ N N N \ \ s R $ \ \t $ s atq { K \ss N $ N \\r\ N H N N s(n ni N N N N t-. e N $(t) \\., alr (x/2??lelilaqailoluny %"x x/.€o/ ELloaNo ,eena a/u X x/304 s/qu/EltOZile x4/,(/1/Z SZ/ile*/ a'Qt/E %x x/5r/ AtlaBps 22r/E 4ru X x x/?/o &luaOas 4/rn/ae /260-/270 Eolluts rbqO 4h x2t 5u8t/etrot( r r I r r r I I I r I r i r r r r r .r f: M) SrN h-..LO_CA_T./OM PApcEL No, lrttttttttttr ttttl L'0 cA T/0N5 0F I//EEO-' ffo 5 -20'OL RE'MAER"S C/ee,oEo As oF 5-5-oZ c/auo&O 4s oFf-?-oZ oFF/cE e a&or uecaPf 44P aUsf/ 2z 2e 27 2u % LO_CA.r"./ON N s \ N N -N \ \ sa >L ut \ \ $\ s a R,q N h- =ss N s N \ s H N SI N B(A N N i ft:h \l ,\ N Nv h. R N s$t \ }J..1 ll ga/zktfiArilE 4AEildE /r">< a/r+x xfiaa P6'tt/,tlsutP A /l't/uE 5o8 Pa{n/so/.e AugilaE 4/%x x x *. l,l/Z Pa{ilsa/e 4/A{08 /%x x I l, %+x X/oo E/ *tatua /eE4L /079 Cat4opillA OPtaE %x x x %+/(22oz Soutf 2en/L CL 45 dF l-/5.O2 PApcEL No, x m_n rEMEil r //o r/ cf- 5 P-1s rED IOCAT/ON, OF IUEEO-' mA TEMEll r //oi r/ cE_ e P1s rEo MA; 5'2o-oL REM4HKs Asot f47-o2 4/g*aeo es or 4-%-tZ C/plttao ,, 4t.-20'oZ C/eeaeo 45 or 5-/5-dL €/Etaao 4s dF {-lzoz 2? 3o "l 92 LOCA.T/ ON P_AEaEL No, *sl.\I \ N N N \ \ -ng) e>l* $tL \ $ s q R,q { K \ s S N $ N * N H \s{ N B (A N N N iu, Sr ,N, F-. N Nv l-'.e N s$t \U l20/ -/ 2o5€fuRrrelrl4 {Uu{UE 4h x x x / 2 to Aanrzlr lA A t/Efi LtE /r4 /( ^oq //owpeo 2/Erta6 4h x x x / 4/ v/cfaalA "frn*o /zi x x X /42 chtuaq fuea %x // /r7 clnriltil, Aaao %x x x 2ZZ ntL,tc:,t'z fia*n /zs x x X c/eatteo es oF 4 -fu 42 lttttttttttttt I ttt I TO REMOVE WEEDS AND RUBBISH Notice is hereby given that on the lst day of April, 2002, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code o the City of Burlingame, Cbapter I 1.08 (Ordinance No. 469), the City Council of said City passed Resolutio:- No. 3l-2CfJf2 declaring tlrat all weeds growing or rubbish existing upon any private property or in any publi street or alley, of zuch character as to be a fire menace or otherwise noxious or dangerous, constitute a publi - nuisance and must be abated by destruction or removal thereof. Notice is further given that property owners shall, without delay, destroy and remove all such weeds or rubbis - ftom their property and the abufing one-half of the street in front and alley, if any, behind such property an between the lot lines extended and mahtain a clean condition continuously throughout the year; or such weed _ and rubbish will be destroyed and the nuisance removed by the City, in which case the cost of destruction o removal will be assessed upon the land from which, or from the front or rear of which, such weeds or rubbis shall have been destroyed or removed; aod such cost will coostitute a lien upon such land until paid, and wil - be collected upon the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected. All property owners baving any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds or rubbish ar- hereby notified to asend a meeting of the Council of said City, to be held at the Council Chambers in the Cit Hall in said City, May 20,20ff2 at 7:fi) P.M., when and where objections will be heard and given du - consideration. S:\A Public Wortr DiTE oTyMISCELLA\wEED.NIC THE CITY OF BI.]RLINGAME Syed Murtuza, City Engineer Dated: April lO,200.2 STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL April 24, 2OO2 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. l+b 5t20to2 DA TO: DATE: FROM SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY sUBJECT: ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO INSTALL A STOP SIGN O EBASTIAN DRIVE AT ARGUEL LO DRIVE TO PROV]DE A THREE-WAY STOP INTERSECTION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing to l. Adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Direct City Clerk to publish a sunmary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROTIND: At their March 14, and April 1 1,2002 meetings, the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) considered a petition from local residents requesting that stop signs be installed on all three legs of the tee intersection at Sebastian Drive and Arguello Drive. There was a concern bythe residents that the crest on Arguello Drive near the intersection created sight distance problems for eastbound drivers. At their April 1 l, 2002 mieting, the TSPC passed a motion recommending the installation ofthree-way stop signs at this tee intersection. Meeting notices were posted on barricade-mounted signs at the intersection, and the adjacent neighborhood was notified. There were no objections expressed at these meetings. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff examined the intersection and determined that stop sign warrants were not met based on vehicular right of way, speed and accidents. However, due to a sharp cresting of Arguello Drive immediately east and adjacent to the intersection, the required stopping sight distance is not met for seeing smaller objects in the roadway at the 25 mph or the prima facie speed limit. As a result, staff recommends that these stop signs be installed to improve safety. Although the existing ordinance already includes stop signs on the two Arguello Drive legs of the intersection, the signage was never installed since the area was developed. With Council approval ofthis amended ordinance, staff will be able to install signage at all three legs. The intersection has Stop Sign Meeting signs posted, and notices have been sent to the neighborhood for this Council meeting. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of installing the three stop signs is estimated to be $500. There are sufficient funds available in the City's current maintenance budget for this work. EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Location map; Aerial Photographs; Public Notice to applicant and residents Petition and Letters from local residents; TSPC Minutes for Marchl4 and April 11,2002 Frank C , P.E. Asst. Public Works Director 650-558-7230 c: City Clerk, Police Department, Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\SebastianDr@ArguelloDr.3WayStopStalfRpt 2.wpd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 l3 t4 l5 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE No. ORDINAI\ICE OF TIIE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME AMEI\IDING SECTION 13.20.010 FOR INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OT SEBASTIAIY DRIVE AT ARGUELLO DRIVE The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section l. The City has received a petition from residents of the Arguello Drive neighborhood seeking the placement ofa stop sign at Sebastian Drive approaching Arguello Drive. The City Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission considered the petition and received testimony regarding the pedeshian needs and traffrc problems in the area and recofltmended placement of a stop sign at this approach to the intersection. Section 2. Subsection 13.20.010(s) is amended to read as follows: (s) SanchezAvenueapproachingCortezAvenue; Sebastian Drive approaching Arguello Drive; Sebastian Drive approaching Frontera Way; Sebastian Drive approaching Mariposa Drive; Sebastian Drive approaching Trousdale Drive; Sequoia Avenue approaching Murchison Drive; Sequoia Avenue approaching Trousdale Drive; Skyline Boulevard approaching Trousdale Drive; Skyview Drive approaching Skyline Boulevard; Stanton Road approaching Gilbreth Road; Summit Drive approaching El Prado Road; Summit Drive approaching Hillside Circle. Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by.law Mayor I ) J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l1 t2 13 t4 15 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing ordinance was introducedataregular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th day of May, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the- day oL 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BURLlNGAMEV-ocal Settings\Temp\stopsign20025.pwd.wpd q ?lrlr,a t.7. at.ttI9t,t IVERA \B =roL (,o b6?J ((lN fi r.r Z2 q 5"7 +vt -\'fc R \ ) a 6\ o I *,. kt -!T I B U R ON Y{A rlI Lo€ I (fl 13t ,/ N s\ ,att ta !GU C L 6 Aoo' ..-_5) AR ptch DR lvE I sEr:a,sflsN pF.l /6 Ar ABarlguuo eP/.{€ It ,!_ aa luN$u(D ,. N5it (\t 3 N 0o u NN <,n s 6\ B$o .tt s iu f NoiI aa.at @ (o ,f @I i'T ffrtgEE SA.{*gIaPSIA;1- oou @ I N,o 2a 1 5 No q5f NaiN ooIEn 6t ,-N(!$o(o at $do 19 G-t' D a, v55 tr.rt &o U 5h'lttrn*.1:*ii;" YOX PARr ) 23 ,.'er!.| I ( SEEASr/HN PFrYE ^rAR6UCI,6 DRIVf The City of Burlingam,e PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tel:(65O1 558-723O Far(65O1 685-9310 CfrY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CAUFORMA 9/rc1c3997 CORFORATION YARD Tel:(65O) 558-7670 'l www. TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 p.m,, Thursday, April 11,2002 City Hall, Conference Room A, 501 Primrose Road The City of Burlingame received a request for 3-way stop signs at the intersection of Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive. ThisitemwillbeacknowledgedatthenextTrafficCommissionmeetingonApril ll,2OO2, at7:00 p.m. in Burlingarne City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Ist Floor, Conference Room A. You are welcome to attend this meeting. At the meeting, attendees will have an opportunity to speak and comment on their concerns. Your attendance, however, is not required for the Commission to consider this matter. The Commission may choose to discuss and/or act on this requestat this meeting. Ifyou are unable to attend this meeting, you may submit your written comments to Traffic. Safety and Parking Commission. 501 Primrose Road. Burlineame. C4 94010. Your written comments will be submitted to the Commission. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please call Frank Erbacher at 650-558-7230. \5 NOTICE PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS INSTALLATION OF 3-WAY STOP SIGNS AT INTERSECTION OF ARGUELLO DRIVE AND SEBASTIAN DRIVE rr3 tr [o o I . Reduce danger-from blind spots and provide better visibility to ,drivers and pedesftians on Arguello AII{D Sebastian Drives . Reduce danger to children ptayrng in streets near this intersection o Allow safer home driveway entrance and exit near intersection Arguello Drive Stop Sign Petition Stop Sign Needed To: On March 14, 2002, the Burlingame Traffic Commissionwill meet to discuss traffic concerrut at the intersection of Arguello & Sebastian Drives PLEASE PIAN TO ATTENDII T;r" *, t. fon o4r )t7? n u. /lo tla_..2b tt<__i3g*-z-pr-n aB 'qlZt o t( FI P, Signafure Please sign below to indicate your support for a stop sign at the intersection of Arguello and Sebastian Drives! Name Address o L /, /-,* i Argtrello Drive Stop Sign Petition Pleasp sign below fo indigate your support for a'stop sigu at the intersection of Arguello and sebastian Drives! Address ol i, ': :.: I .:' ' a:: t\ P-O. Po( ioO Brrftrgflre, C ga{Xf February 25,20U2 Fbnnyoun Barekat, Traffic/Associate Engineer The Ctty of Burfinganre 501 Prinume Road Burfirgane, CA94010 DearMr. Barekat Respecfully Jdrn E Rornan On bdtralf of Burtrgane rex;irren$ my wife and myself, pbase reil tib lefrer as a reqnest for affic ra/iew d the htersedixr dAryrelo and Sebag&rr Drive h Arfrgane ns reslOenE rryho fve near ttis inbrseciitrn, we be$eve that a 3-uray s{op sign b requled due to stgrtiEcant Hind spo6 trat exist --.. i -:==- rtt' I--'- . Or rnah conoem b tre fact ftat ttrere are no silop r&ns d thb hersdion. The danger of an accilent bhcrereirpasthenun$erofdrildrenpEyhghthesfiee[hcreases. Driversenter0reinterseaion wffiontteabf,ftytoseeorerthecrestoffrchifionArguesot]ive. Driversabowtriparoundfire66Nner on SeHian Drive wi[rcut regad for sonreone crrcnng tE steet Additirnaly, s;ince tre haffic h35 incrmed m AgueIo Drive it b nrre.dangerous lhan ever to puil out of orr diveurays due b the bfind spots oonrftr€ overtheh!tr onArgueflo Drive \Ah are also requeding that broken reflefrrdots be reptaoed on Argrue[o Drive. Pbase advise if here b a form orpeffiftm b be comfleted brthis request I plan to afterd tre haffic oonrnissnm nteeting on Marcfr 14'aruC speak m behalf of the concenreO nei,ghbors. I can be contacted at (650) 6976461. 4, 5:t \ Itacfr lO,2m2 TRAf,Frc SAFETY AND PARKII.IG COMMISSION MEETNrc Citythll CootrwRoomA PrirocRod Butinearrq CA REGARDT}.IG }.IOTICE FOR }WAY ST@ SIGN AT INTERSECTION OF ARGT'EI'O DRTVE AND SEBASTIAN DRIVE THISST@SIGNIS LOI.IGOVi]RDUE WE}IAVE SMAII CHILDRENINTTIEAREAWTIOCON}.OT GO OUTSIIE TO PLAY. I LIVE ON TIIE CORNER OF SEBASTIAN AI.ID ARGT'EIII) DRIVE AI{D I IIAVE TOBE VERY VERY CAREFT.,L BACXING O[,T OF MY GARAGE OR. Pt,LIIirc INTO MY GARAGE FOR. FEAROF BEII.IGHIT I;ROM I,JPWARD ANDDOWNWARD ARGUEII.o TRAFFIC I{IELYTHIS HAS BBCOME ASPEEDWAY_ESPtsCIALLY ItrIDAYMGHTS. N,sO. TIIETEM?!,E ACROSS TIIE STREE'T TIAS lr DAY ScIrcOL AND ARELIGIOT'S SCHOOI- WHICH TIM CHILIXEN EXTHER WALK TO OR. G.J C JT SIDE FOR ACIIWIIES. WE AISO TIAVE A SEMOR, FOPI,'I.ATIOT{ WHO EN'OY WALXI}rc WNH THEIR DOGS. THIS TOO IIAS BECOME VERY RISKY FOR TIIEM A}.ID TIIE A}.IIMAIS. PLEASE COD.ISIDER OtR. REQLTEST. OT R FEAR IS WHEN BART BECOTVTE.S PART OF OUR COII,ffVITINITY.THIS SITUATKhI. AS WELLA.STROI,'SDALD,TI/ILLBEOOME VERY SERIOUS FOR,ALLGUS. SII.ICERELY,fu/2e.2-/ AI{N.XAEErFrAr.rD r@gEBAsrrANDRrvE BlELrl.ICArvrE, CA 9,rc10 "^-ss9492-3s6t'- ;:SIiland @yahoo.com ir.,., PS I am thc origiml ownerand reside herc. llAR I 4 2002 OFOEPT.ofcmY EVEIGE # My name is Mary Cotter. I live at 2847 Arguello Drive. My home is right at the intersection of Arguello & Sebastian. This location is on the crest of a hill. Sometimes people drive right through @ speeds of 45 to 5O miles per hour with little no clear view ahead of them. Kids play in the neighborhood. They ride their bikes and rollerblade in the streets. It is entirely possible that some child could be seriously injured or possible die because of unsafe drivers. A three way stop sign is needed at this intersection for our safety and tJle safety of our children. ,t 6 "h ( ,? TRAFFIG, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved iThursday, March 14, 2002 driveway with a good view of cross traffic which tends to move at over 35 mph. Also, a second red zone needs repainting. Officer Tamura advised that Rollins Road is now on selective enforcement due to this request. Mr. Erbacher advised that the City will notice the neighborhood of this request for the next meeting. 5.2 l3O9 North Carolan Avenue - Request for Red Zone The petitioner was not present. 5.3 Arguello Drive and Sebastian Drive - Request for 3-Way Stop Signs Mr. Roman submitted a signed petition for rhis request. He stated that there are numerous blint spots for drivers accessing this intersection which is a hazard for the neighborhood children and for cars backing out of their driveways at this site. Also, there has be-en an increase in school traffrc for the Franklin School. Ms. Cotter stated her home is at this intersection which is on the crest of a hill; and with the police upping their enforcement on Trousdale, more drivers are using Arguello now. Accessing her driveway is becoming more hazardous. Mr. Barekat advised that the centerline needs to be replaced and he will request it. Comm. Cohen asked if the increased traffic is due to the temple nearby. Mr. Roman stated no, it's due to avoidance now of Trousdale and irrcreased school traffrc. 5.4 Dwight Road at kxington Way - Request for Stop Sign Ms. Castello complained ofspeeders on Dwight Road. One driver went so fast, she crashed inJo her front yard tree to avoid hiaing an on-coming car. She feels a stop sign would slow down drivers. Mr. Barekat advised that there are existing Yield signs at this intersection. 5.5 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of the area to detennire whether traffic-calming rnqrsures are warranted Officer Tamura submitted thek Selective Enforcement results which showed 15 citations issued and three warnings. 5.6 Howard Avenue - Speed ad Trucks (e-mail) 5.7 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition) Mr. Mufloz stated he lives on the 1400 block where the number of parked cars allows only one driving lare so drivers go slow. Chair Mclver stated that construction trucks are a problem, too. The Cityd Butlhgame Page 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING Meeting Minutes - Unapproved COMMISSION Thursday, April 11 ,20oi2 from reiterated tFt ttrere are nueqrous bli4 Sip aithis',ipteis,ection; and Trrruydale D4vg "1rd elpnienAry Sa."rs w,ttkfiEiiirschoo-t;'it is a ; .'i:,. ij:-.- '. .t. 4od he will 'sitb distance Itwasmoved ,*.1$,.Tpood4 (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to recoqmed to Co.uncil to instal! a 3-way Stqp sryn at this inte.qecfon. ,u,T*o*ly approved b1 fu cog-rmission. Mr. Erbacher ad'iifuc mat rdcr *ru notlce'trereig1uo*ooaforthecodncil.actionmebting- ' ',.1 .,- 1".,,','', , , ''-, 4.2.6 Dwrghr Road at kxington Way - ReqqesJ for {top,Sign, :. Mr. F-bacler -ldvipd.ttrat rhe percentile sp@ is aq 30 mph, some of tk traffic ryas p_131-3gmph. He stateiithat he will be working with the fiitioner tookiag at rrrffi" t .#.ioo ta rro", down tbe traffic. He also rec,oppendeo aoaing sped limit signagg. gtrcer witt was present ad' stated that the accident at'ttris'site was a teat'aciiaentrad tbat ffist'of tt" t iiiil dveh at just , !4der.30 pp!. Enfo4ement is discult sirce it is not includ$ in tbe_ Speed Survey. He ' '' iecomm€nded:eriforcement ano eaueation. Mr. Erbackir aavisedi'tnit'S"=fu'm*ting tin tn" petitiorer tomorrow. This item will remain as an Aclarowledgment r**, , ; . , 4.2.J 7415 Ar{etiqe Drive - Irtter regarding Traffrc Concerns related tq Sisg,'rg,of Mercy l.ocale ftre riCident stated drive* are straddling the ceriterline and is corceineO abotrt.safery.iid'rfrrr have been several accidents and many near-accifents. Officei Witt adiisdl'flLt *here ite roaO bends it is somewhat deceptive and the lane appears narrower.who straddle oenterlines are citable if it occurswithin 100 feet of an stated that this is a police iszue, and ttrev bave been advised. Mr. Vehicle Code for sections that do :urow citations. Erb"r$j stated,ft w,9ug check the 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. 5.1 Increased Traffic on Trousdale Drive due to Millbrae BART Station qbnin} "., ..,,':,. ,, lv{1.- Erbacher adviqed &at tlds petitioner is just sharing his thoughts orr the subjec!. Ng action reErired.,,,] 5.2 Request to change 2-Hour Parking Spaces to 2GMinute Spaces on East Side of 1800 Btock of Magnolia Avenue The petitioner stated that since the yoga site opened ,yagastudents qse the It parkins sDaces in frontof their stores for two hours at a time. The small businesses sn this bloc[-'live "m- Al" by their customer's ability to park close to the business; so they are asking that the tiry limit for the I I parking ,. :._.' Tlrc@ydBwtutgan e BS - Re$pst for Stop Signs3-Way , :- .:i.t . STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL April 24, 2OO2 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 4c 5t20to2 TO: DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY ADOPT AN ORDINANCE DELETING ONE-HOUR PARKlNG AND ESTABLISHING TWO-HOUR PARKING, THE EAST SIDE OF CARO LAN AVENUE FROM CADILLAC WAY TO BROADWAY RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Council hold a public hearing to 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROLTND: AttheirmeetingsofMarch14andAprilll,2002,theTraffrc,SafetyandParkingCommission (TSPC) considered a request from Mr. Mike Harveyto place two hour parking on Carolan Avenue adjacent to his business at I 100 Carolan Avenue. At their April 1 1, 2002 meeting, the TSPC passed a motion recommending that 2-hour parking signs be placed at this location. A public notice ofthe TSPC meetings was sent to the adjaceniauto businesses, and no objections were received. DISCUSSION: Mr. Harvey stated that his business has the need for curb-enforced tumover curb parking every two hours. He hasjust completed reworking a portion of the frontage allowing for two added parking spaces due to driveway closures. The area is posted in error for two-hour parking, as the existing ordinance states one hour. Adjacent businesses have been noticed of this Council meeting. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of installing additional new Two-Hour Parking signs and replacing one existing sign is estimated to be $500. There are sufficient funds available in the City's current maintenance budget for thii work. EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Location Map; Aerial Photo; Copy of Notice Sent TSPC Minutes for March 14 and April I1,2002 C. Erbacher, P.E. Asst. Public Works Director 650-ss8-7230 cc: City Clerk, Police Department, Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission Mr. Mike Harvey S:\A Public Works Directory\StaffReports\Carolan ave 2-FIr Parking Cadillac to Broadway 5-6-02 2.wpd 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l1 t2 l3 t4 15 t6 t7 18 t9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE No. ORDINAI\CE OF THE CITY OF BT'RLINGAME CHANGING TIIE PARKING LIMIT ON NORTH CAROLAIT AVENT'E BETWEEN CADILLAC WAY AI\TD BROADWAY FROM ONE HOUR TO TWO HOT]RS The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1 . The business and property owner adjacent to the area on North Carolan Avenue between Cadillac Way and Broadway has requested that the time limit be changed from one hour to two hours to better accommodate business uses in the area. The Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission has recommended approval of this change. Section 2. Section 13.36.030 is amended to read as follows: 13.36.030 One-hourparking. Except where prohibited or otherwise designated for shorter term time periods, it is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle for a period longer than one hour between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. on any day, excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part ofthe following streets or portions of streets: (1) Broadway from El Camino Real to Califomia Drive; (2) Burlingame Avenue, from California Drive to El Camino Real; (3) California Drive, west side, from Douglas to Bellevue Avenue and from Carmelita Avenue to Broadway; (4) Ingold Road, north side, 48 feet west from the curb return of Rollins Road to 128 feet west from that same curb refum. Section 2. Section 13.36.040 is amended to read as follows: 13.36.040 Two-hourparking. It is unlawful for the driver of any vehicle to park such vehicle, unless elsewhere in this title otherwise provided, for a longer period than two hours between the hours designated any day, excepting Sundays and holidays, upon any part of the following streets, or portions of streets: 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g l0 1l t2 13 l4 l5 t6 t7 l8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (a) Eight a.m. to six p.m.: (1) Adrian Road, west side, one hundred fifty-five feet southerly from the southeast end of the curb retum of David Road. (2) Anita Road, west side, from Peninsula Avenue one hundred and forty-five feet north toward Bayswater Avenue; (3) Bayswater Avenue from El Camino Real to Park Road; south side, from California Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; (4) Bellevue Avenue, except the south side from Primrose Road to Almer Road; (5) Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side from Occidental to El Camino Real; (6) California Drive, west side, from Carmelita Avenue to three hundred feet south of Sanchez Avenue; from Burlingame Avenue to Peninsula Avenue; from Oak Grove Avenue 400 feet northwards to 755 Califomia Drive, except areas designated for thirty minute parking; (7) Capuchino Avenue from four hundred feet southerly to four hundred ninety-five feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; (8) Carmelita Avenue, south side, from El Camino Real to Chula Vista Avenue; (9) Carolan Avenue, west side, from Oak Grove Avenue to Burlingame Avenue; east side, from one hundred feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet northerly of Toyon Drive; and east side, from Cadillac Way to Broadway; (10) Chapin Avenue, from Chapin Lane to El Camino Real; ( I I ) Chula Vista Avenue from the centerline of Broadway to four hundred ten feet southerly of the centerline of Broadway; (12) Douglas Avenue; (13) East Lane, east side, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue; (14) El Camino Real service road between Dufiflerin Avenue and Murchison Drive; (15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from Primrose Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; north side from Primrose Road to Highland Avenue; 2 I 2 ) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll t2 t3 t4 15 16 t7 t8 t9 20 2t 22 Z3 24 25 26 27 28 (16) Laguna Avenue from two hundred eighty feet southerly to five hundred ten feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; (17) LortonAvenue, westside, fromBayswaterAvenueto HowardAvenue; eastside, from Howard Avenue one hundred twenty feet south toward Bayswater and forty feet north toward Burlingame Avenue; (18) Magnolia, west side, from Trousdale Drive toPlazalane; (19) Occidental Avenue, from El Camino Real to Ralston Avenue; (20) Paloma Avenue from three hundred ten feet southerly to one hundred thirty feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; (21) Park Road, except the west side, from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue; (22)Primrose Road, west side, from Howard Avenue to El Camino Real; (23) Ralston Avenue, from Occidental Avenue to El Camino Real; (24) Rollins Road from ninety feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet northerly of Toyon Drive; (25) South Lane, both sides; (26) Trousdale Drive, north side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive and Califomia Drive to ninety feet west of said curb return. (b) Nine a.m. and four p.m.: (l) Carmelita Avenue, north side, between Chula Vista Avenue and El Camino Real; (2) Magnolia Avenue, east side. Section 4 This ordinance shall be published as required by law Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6thday of May, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting ofthe City Council held on the_day 3 I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 13 l4 l5 t6 t7 18 19 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of__,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BURllNGAMEU-ocal Settings\Temp\PARKZON5.wpd City Clerk 4 Ls94: PAR.. \ R oL Lr rt9 (o.tzt k) P.t yd-tl reta PARC to& G ARO L*f{ SOUTHERN F lft RAI GALIFORNIA a Pn yu-j ?G,' ?AR I PNYh" a6 13 R66 6U5 9a'Q.tt ( N ,oll c.otltrc. /alla & lo, ROLLIT{S RD. lo6 tto,roc -t .8Frat ( (, JJo () loal Cao,.LaL /ol/ Oa..aa toro o.?3 *- pa s a2'za'-: I I I I =cl oG SH ORE 8ay hatsc 5.' V,t-.?t t\'It r# o-r-x p,ot5Lr5 ctry G 1.*. b:z+aA')PARCEL' 2 Px yol.tt, era-.- \ N-*.- lotc F *-- //ooO.c r.- G ,"t' e s !$s % /oct SEE SII€ET I8 /-- a) CITY A COUNTY OF S ,oto o.2t ,c- The City of Burlingame PI,BI.JC WORKS DEPARTMET{T Tel:(6501 568-7230 Far(6501 68$93rO CITY HAII . 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CAUFORNIA 94OIG3997 CORFORATION YARD Tet(65O1 558-7670 www. TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION IITEETING 7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 11,2002 City Hall, Gonference Room A,501 Primrose Road The City ofBurlingame received arequestfor2-hourparking spaces alongthe newcurbing at I100 Carolan Avenue. This item will be a Discussion Item at the next Traffic Commission meeting on April I l, 2002, at7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, lst Floor, Conference Room A. You are welcome to attend this meeting. At the meeting attendees will have an opportunity to speak and comment on their concerns. Your attendance, however, is not r€quired for the Commission to consider this matter. The Commission may choose to discuss and/or act on this request at this meeting. If you are unable to attend this meeting, you may zubmit your written comments to Traffrc. Safety 4nd Parking Commission- 501 Primrose Ropd Burlingame. CA 94010. Your written comments will be submitted to the Commission. If you have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please catl Frank Erbacher at 650-558-7230. L NOTICE PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS INSTALLATION OF 2.HOUR PARKING AT 1{OO CAROLAN AVENUE +,,')- TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved March 14,2OO2 Mr. Peters observed lot use and number of drop offs on various days: 2115, 7 cars in the lot, 49 cars dropped off1' 2118,7 cars in the lot, 3 on Peninsula; 2119,44 cars droppd off, 4 on Peninsula; 2120,4 cars picked up, 5 cars on Peninsula, spaces available in lot. Believes owner should asphalt dirt area in lot and re-stripe making 12 spaces. This wottld make a green zone on Bloomfield unnecessary. At 5:15 p.m. there are cars parking on westboud Peninsula across from the restaurants a few blocks eastward, and there's no safety issue there. Even with a green zone on Btoomfield, people will park on Peninsula. Parking in the evening on the San Mateo side is available. Ms. Richardson measured the school's lot which is 32' wide by 50' long; and with space needd for cars to back up, no more spaces can be added. The owner stated that there is no need to asphalt the dirt area because parents already use that area anyway. She has 68 kids in school being dropped offand picked up everyday. Ms. McCleary asked if traffrc safety overrides school safety. She has noticed that traffic on Peninsula has increased in the last l0 years; and feels, we nlust compromise. Stre likes the green zone on Bloomfield with tire limitation. Even though cars will stop and wait to circle for space on Bloomfield, residents should use tlreir own driveways and garages rather than the City street for parking. Ms. Abbey stated the residents have a right to have parking spaces available on their street for visitors. Mr. Erbacher advised that if a green zone is irstalled on Bloomfield, it would be timed for the peak period. Ttre centerline on Peninsula may be able to be moved by making the curb lane 12 feet wide and the other lane 10 feet wide. Mr. Barekat suggested the possibility of a special meeting for this issue be held before ttre regular April meeting since we have no quonrm this evening. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 1240 Paloma Avenue - Irtrer regarding Blue Handicapped Zone The petitioner was present and stated that they have a two-car garage for their two cars; but her husban<l's work truck is too long for the driveway. He is perrnanently disabled, so they're asking for a blue zone close to theii house so he doesn't have to walk far after work every night. They noticed that there is a blue zone also on the 1300 block of Paloma. 4-2.2 1100 Carolan - ktter regarding mainaining existing 2-hour parking ad adding 2-hour parking along new curbing Petitioner was not present. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. 5.1 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extension Joe Cowan of the SFPUC stated that an employee at another site was killed when stuck by a car while exiting ttrat site's driveway. This site was surveyed ard they deterrrined that they need an extension of one existing red zone 1s sliminate parking near the driveway which would facilitate exiting the 5 The City dBudingame Page4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Thursday, April 11 ,2002 2. PI"EDGE OF ALIEGTANCE TO THE FLAG: 3. ROLL C.ALL: 5 of 5 Cornmissioners presedt. 4.1 AC:IION ITEMS. 4.1-1 Mihute;forFebruary 14,?,W2',wefesubmittdadapproved.:MinutesforMarch l4,ZWz ' were siibmittd for record purposes only since therdwas no quo..,--*for t6is ;;in;- -- 4-l-2 1710 Trousdale Drive - Red Cross rgquests Relocation of Existing Green Znne . : "'''li' :i:'' 'Mr- Er.bacher'advised that the petitiorer had changetl their roquest ftom a red:.i6de,to relocationofitlrc gre€n zone which has ben cornpleted. :,, .. , : ,.' 4,13''Installaiion of a Green Zone on'Bloomfield Road,noith of peni*ula.Avenue, .i The'preschool or\frrer obtained a,co,pj of ,a.bluepriirt'of the prope(y.which iirdicates that theproperty next door at7l0 Peninsula Avenue is part of their p*tiog rea; airdsilrh" *rid;will be moving out in a month, the preschool will not need ; groiro* at all and withdrcw this 4.2 DISCUSSION MEMS. 4.2.1 l24o Paloma Avenue - r,etter regarding Blue Hadicapped Zone k. Erbach-e-r hadlmeasuredithe site'ad there-is'limited parking in.the driveiiay.rT6 residentcottld drive to his parked tnrck or modry the garage to "rto*-&Cte more space.'c oi*r. u.y",suggested the residenlcoul{ gark his tnrck crosswise in th" dri;; d.-ihir will be continuedto next month since the petitiorer was not present to submit testimoiy. - ..t. .'--, 4'2'2 ll00 Carolan - Lrtter r-qgarding maintaining existing 2-hoqrparking and adding 2-hourparking along new curbing . : Petitioner' Mike HarvGy, stated"2-hour piirking signage exists noal hit it is unenforcd; and localemplovees, park dt dar'tbsre.,tn"y'*& puldqg-.#t"btfit f.o' tnei.:a";;: N"ffiffi Eas been addd with the rew constnrction which allows *r" [gurrg rg"6[, -"rp*auy^if CarclaoAvenue northboud lam were narrowed just south or rroiawry sgt. cou", advised that thparking limit is rlot property sigued so they carmot'issue tickea. Mr. Erbacher advistid that tnop:lrking spaces could be added; and it should be a two-hour lirnit, but an ordinance is needed toeffect the 2-hour limit- rt was movetl and seconded (Comms. Mayer/Evans) to *or rh#;Action item immediately- Unanimously approvd by the commission. It; then rmved ad Page3 TlrcCItycfBtnfrngolrc 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:N p.m. by Chair Mclver. TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING'COiUMISSION ' ' . .. ' Meeting Minutes - UnaPProved Thursday , April 11,2442 seonded (Comms. Mayer/Evans) to recomue.d to Corrcil to effect a 2-hour parking limit and i6tall proper signage. Unanimously approved by,the Coqmission; lrr*.'Eq,bacher advisg4 tqa*t the ordinance will be introduced at the May 6e Courcil meeting. .:.'- . -.: '' '. 4.2-3 1657 Rollins Road - Request for Red Zone Extensiore, including Fronti4g 1ffi3 *d lfils Rollins Road and Relocation of Red Curb Opposite 1660 and,l634.Rollins,Road' ' r. Petitioner, Mr. Cowan, stated tlrey have 30 vehicles, and cars parked to,ttE leftsf,their driv.-eways block their site when exiting- Their kalth aod safety organization evaluated the site and regested r rhe exisring r,ed zom be ex{edd th futl length of th bleck,.gqpqcialty sirye Rollins,R.oad traffic . moves. faster than th postcd 35 mph",Mr- Ctwan,requeste4 {@!,i!$eir health and safety organi-ation be able to attend the meeting next month to make a formal presentation Mr. Erbacher advised that rnost driveways along Rollins Road bdve a 70-foot red zone on tk left .,side enabling good.vislt ilrty inexiting.-This site dqq4:t have a condnu.olrq rd zone. fire south driveway has the biggest problem when tnrcks lErk to.the lcftand soqe e-ven Ule tbe red zolp to park. It was moved and secoded (Comms. Evans/Mayer) to move this item to an Action item immeAiatefy. Unaoimor5ly approved by tlre Copmission- ThiS will be an Actionftem oext month. 4.2.4 1309 North Carolan.Avenue - Requestfor Rd or,Yellosr Zore atrRear,of 1305 ad 1309 -: Rollins Road '".i' i ;1,- ,.r l l'ne- petitioner, Mr. IVoog; stated there is an alley betwen 13(D and 1313 Rollim-ald he has truct/trailers 63 feet long which have trouble turning into the il"y; so ad{rng a yellow zone would make it easier for them to pull h anil out. From the floor,iManager,of 1309,Rollim Road stated he has six spaces for his customers so his six employees park elsewhere. He disagrm with removal of parking spaees, Ivfanager. of 1307 Rollins,Road sta.ted theJ.need spacesfor eryloyee parking. Manager of l33l Rollins Road submitted a written note disagreeing with adding a red or ydlgmrzore..The qiglnaldeveloper of the proper,tyi, 1305-1'331 RO.!!ins Road, exlilained that the. re are six busindses.shar-fug &is site.wi& 38"4r&i4g slraaes o,n site e .nd'aq average of 25:30 employees. He,estimates that there afe,100 customers a day, He feds that a red or,y-ellow zore causing the loss of ttrrep-,or f6ur spaces wo.uld be very b{d.and,recomtrnds detriial of request. Manager of 1335 Rollins Road stated parking is a proble4 now ad to eliminate spaces to aqgg{udate seqds.is wro4g-.,Mr- Woag. stated k.@s two spaces ad.t}attwo gars-tave been , 1, , i;,,! Comm, Evam wants to visjt the,site beforc be discussosrthe rqrqqtr Thii wilI.'be.a Disctlssion :.-,:'. , Itemnextmonth. Mr. Erbacher,advisdthatstaffwillrclrcgicethe,reiglbor qfor,oextmoirth's ';: ',. .;.,.' meeting..'i;,, -::,tt1.;, heCfVdBwhgane Page 4 -t TO: STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BY BY SUBIVIITTED APPROVEI} AGENDA ITEM# MTG. DATE 6c 5.20.02 ry.- TY PROGRAM TO 2OO4 DATE:14. FROM: SUBIECT: AMEND ZONING CODE TO EXTEND SECONI) ACTION The council should review the proposed zoning amendment which would extend the current second unit amnesty program from June lO, ZOiOZto June ia, ZOO| and require applicants to make any required improvements to eligible second rnit, *ithi, on. y.u, of city action. To introduce the ordinance for second ,.uaing and public hiaring at your meeting of June 3,2002, Council should' A. Request city clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance' C. Introduce the proposed ordinance' D. Direct ttre citv clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoPtion. Planning Commission Recommendation: At their meeting on May 13, zooz,ttt piunning commission held a public hearing and voted on a voice vote 7-0-0 to recommend that the City Council extJnd the time frame foiaccepting applications for amnesty for existing second dwelling units in the R-1 zone built before January 1,1954; and give applicants one year to do any construction required to make trr. uppiored unit safe and sanitary. In their discussion commissioners noted that it was i-portant to continue tti, rur..rsful program but since the Housing Element includes a review of the program requirements, a two year extension was suffrcient at this time' CODE COMPLIANCE General plan: program complies with General Plan development policy and the provisions of the currently effective Housing" Elemeni. The Second Unit lmnesty program is also being considered as an implementation tooT in the proposed draft 2001-2006 Housing Element' Zoning:This program affects only properties zoned R-1, single family residential' cEeA Status: Article 19. categorically Exempt per section: Article 19. categorically Exempt per Section: 15332 - In-Fill Development p-rojects, clur, 32'consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) The projecf is tonsistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general ptan poiiiiel -as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) The proposed a.r.tofrnJ"t o."u11 within city limits on a- project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare A]YIEND ZONING CODE TO EXTEND SECOND UNITAIINESTY PROGRA]YI TO 2OO4 May 20,2002 or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to trafftc, noise, air quality, or water quality; (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. BACKGRQUND: In June of 2001, the City Council initiated a new program, second dwelling unit amnesty in the R-l zone, as an implementation of the 1994 Housing Element. The purpose of the program was to conserve and to make safe and sanilary existing second units which had been approved by the city and built before 1954, when city regulations q-hanged and such units were no longer allowed in the R-l zone. At initiation the program was approved for two years. Applications would be accepted in the first year July 2001 to June 2002, and applicants would be given until June 2003 to apply for a building permit and complete improvements to make the approved units comply with the Housing Code. Without amendment to the zoning code the Planning Department will not be able to accept applications for this program after June 30,2002. There have been about 8 requests for second unit amnesty. All but two have completed the review process. Of the two remaining one has an on-site parking issue to resolve and one was not built before 1954. While the program has;tarted slowly, it appears to be effective. No neighbors have protested the applications which have been circulated. The property owners have actively participated in inspections and have followed up with necessary repairs. In the recent public review of the 2001-2006 Draft Housing Element, the Second Dwelling Unit Amnesty Program wap recognized for its benefit in maintaining smaller, more affordable housing units in the city's housing stock. In fact one of the work programs suggested in the 2001-2006 Housing Element is that this program be reviewed for its potential to be expanded. In light of its role in the Draft Housing Element's work program, it has been suggested by the Planning Commissioq that the current progfam be extended for only two years e.g. applications could be accepted until June 30, 2004. Further extension could be considered as apart of the review ofthe program's requirements in the first year implementation program for the 2001-2006 Housing Element. The proposefl changes to the current regulations governing second unit amnesty (Chapter 25.59) are l. Applications for approval of an existing second unit shall be made before June 30, 2004; and 2. Applicant shall receive a certificate of occupancy within one year of city approval of the special ilermit allowing the second unit. The ProposedChanges to the Zoning Code: Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program paper attached describes the wording changes and provides annotation explaining the reasons fir each change proposed. A copy ofthe proposed ordinance is also attached. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission StaffReport, May 73,2002, with attachments. Proposed Changes to the Zoning code: Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program Planning Commission Minutes April 22, 2OOZ Ordinance City of Burlingame Amend Zoning Code to Extend Seconil anit AmnestY Program Meeting I)ate: 05.13 -02 Request: Arnend ZonngCode Section 25. 59.080 to extend the time frame for accepting applications for amnesty for oristing second units in the R-l zone built before 1950; and give applicants one year to do any construction required to make the approved unit safe and sanitary. General plap: program complies with General Plan development policy and the provisions of the currently effective Housing Element. The Second Unit Amnesty program is also being considered as an implementation tool in the proposed drafr2Dl-2006 Housing Element. Zoning-.This program affects only properties zoned R-1, single family residential. CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 157;31 - In-Fill Development Projects: Class 32 consists of projects charac/rerrrd as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section. (a) The project is consistent with the appticaUte general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable ,;niog desi-gration and regulations; (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site oino more than five acres zubstantially zurrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no valug as habitat forendangered, rare or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not rezult in any significant efus relating to traffig noisg air quality, or water quality; (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Summary: On June 30i,2W2, we will have to stop taking applications for legalizing existing second residential units built beforel954, in the R-l zone. Since this prograrn is just taking off and the Draft llousing i' Element advocates its continuation, staff would zuggest that we act immediately to qrtend the time penod for accepting new applications. As discussed at the joint City Council/?lanning Commission meeting in February now that we have some experience with the program we may wantto change some of the iequirementr. fni* review and possible change to the requirerrents can be addressed as a part of the first year implementation program for the 2OOI-2Cfl6 Housing Element. The present nrggwtion is simply to extcnd the present progam so that it can continue to serve the commurrity while we are evaluating a4d rwising it, ifnecessary. ;. Extending the current program also requires that a deadline be established for property owners to make repairs so that the second unit is safe and sanitary. As it now stands (see attachedZotng Code Chapter 25.59), property owners had one year in which to make application (June 30,2OOl to June 3Q ZOO2) and then one year within which to make the needed corrections (Iune 3O,2OOZ to June 30,2AA3). The premise of the current regulation is that one year is zufficient time for property owners to get a building permit, make repairs identified to make the unit safe and sanitary and to have the improvements inspected by the city Building Deparhnent. In general repairs should be minor; major sfuctural additions to the second unit are not allowed by the present regulations. Based on the crrrrent provisions, the extension of time frame for the program also rquires that the requirernents be clarified Item Amenitt*e coileb Ertendthe Time Frune offie second llnitAnmesty hogron May 13' 2002 that applicar$s have one year from date of city approval of a second unit, to complete any required i*prov"r.nti. If the improvements have not been inspected by the city within a year, the approval for that second unit will "*pir". There will be no limit on the number oftimes a property owner may apply for amnesty for a given-unit. The down side to the owner will be that the requirements of the Housing Code which is used by the city for inspection purposes may change over time. So he may need to make more repairs or improvements to meet safe and sanitary standards at a later date. Study The Commission reviewed the proposed change to the second unit amnesty regulations at their meeting on April 22, 2N2. @C Mnutes April 22, 2OOZ) Commissioners asked the following: o Could theprogrambe extended for onlytwo years (to lune 30,2004) instead of the four years proposed (Iune 30, 2006X Staffsuggested an extension for four years so that the progftLm would run with the time frame of theZQOl-2006 Housing Eleme,lrt. Another option would be to make it permanent (have no expiration d"te), which would insure that an oversiglrt would not resuh in the program being iniOvertentty droppd because we failed to note that it was expiring. Certainly it can be extended for two years at this time and considered for renewal 18 months from now. Since there is a priority to review the criteria over the next year, a recommendation on the time frame ofthe progftrm could be made at that time. What is important arrrently is that the program not lapse. o How are we promoting this program? Presently we have posted information about the Second Unit Amnesty program on the City's web site. In addition there are filers posted in City Hall and at the Library. When we initiated the program about a year agq we put advertisements in the San Mateo County Times. There have been over time a number of news stories on the program, including the Chanrber Newsletter. The progla4.was advertised in the Su.mmer 200I.Recreation Brochure. Finally, we put a note promoting the program in lune/July 2001 water bill of each city resident. Staff would suggest that if the program is extended we do another round of promotion for the program. Proposed Changes Based on the Commission comments at study, the draft ordinance before you at public hearing proposes to exte,nd the program for two years to June 30, 2OO4. No changes were made to the proposal ttrat property owrrers be given one year in which to comply; and failure to make required re,pairs within that time frame will result in expiration of the approval. Subsequent applications for the same unit will be treated as if it were a new application. Program Co$s The only feep charged the applicant for this permit is an inspection deposit fee of $375. Applicants also pay $70 to cover noticing. The actual cost for inspections seems to be closer to $135. the remainder is 2 Amendflte Code to Ertendthe Ttne Frwte of the Second UnitAmnesly hagrort Mqt 13' 2002 refunded. Noticing costs are not refunded if the application is withdrawn after it has been noticed- There is no charge for stafftime with this program. Planning Cqmmission Action The planning Commission should hold a public hearing on the proposed change to the Second Unit Amnesty regulations. The action is a recommendation to City Council- Attachments: proposed Ch3nges to the ZonngCode: Amendment to the Second Unit Amnesty Progranq Annotated April29,20OZ Planning Commission Minutes, Aprtl 22, 2002 Ordinance t- 3 Apil 29,2002 Proposed Changes to the ZoningCode Amendment to Extend the Second Unit Amnesty Program Attlre Joint City CouncillPlanning Commission meeting in February 2C0l3, the intention to have full leview ofthe Second Unit Amnesty Program was set as an implementation priority forthe 2}Ol-2f[l6HousingElement. The City should adoptthe 2001'2006 ifousing Element in June or July. Unfortunately the Second Unit Amnesty program is pr.r.ntl-y structured that the city cannot take applications after lune 30,2A02. In order to "tlo* the program to continug this ordinance revision would extend the time frame for accepting and processing applications. Later in the year the Planning Commission will review possible changes to the requirements for second unit amnesty The code changes to extend the time frame for,accepting applications for second unit amnesty follow. Each change in annotated to clari$ the purpose of the proposed change. Code Section 25.59.080 Time frame. Now reads: Applications for approval of a special permit shall be made on orbefore June 30, 2W2. Any approved special permit that has not complied within the time requirements contained in this section shall lapse and be of no further force and effect on June 30,20A3 Proposed wording: Applications for approval of a special permit shall be made on orbefore June 3A, 2006. Any approvad special permit that has not comBlied mtdreceived a certificate of **porcywit}in one (1) yeu of city qprwal action on the special permil shall lapse and be ofno further force and effect. Annotationi When staff noted that the current amnesty program would expire June 30, 2002, staff suggested that the expiration date of the program be extended to the life of the 2001 -2006 Housing Element because the second unit amnesty program is a fundamental program in implementation of the city's housing pqlicy. At study before the Commission, several commissioners suggested that the program should not be extended for so long, indicating that perhaps a two year extension at this time might be more appropriate. (Planning C,ommission minutes April 22,2OOZ). The proposed revision to the code has been changed to reflect a two year extension. If this change is limited to two years, staff would suggest that a longer extension, at Proposed Cbages to the Zoning Code:Amendment to Exterd thesecondUnit &trn€sty Program AVil29,2@.2 least to coincide with the 2001-2006 Housing Element, should be considered when the entire program is reviewed as apart of next year'S Housing Element implementation work program' The new wording proposes two changes to the time frame for applying for amnesty for an existing second unit built before 1950. The first change is to accept applications for the next three years (to June 30, 2005)' The second change is to require those who are approved to complete any required physical improvements to make the unit safe and sanitary and have them inspected by the Building Department within a year of city approval of the unit. This follow up is important since one of the primary reasons for making existing second units conforming is to insure that they are safe and sanitary for those who live in them' CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA Monday, Apil22,2002 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Vistica called the Monday, Apil22,z002,regulm meeting ofthe Planning Commission to order at7:A2p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Momoe; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson ilI. MINruTES The minutes of the April 8, 2002 meeting regular of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL'OX'AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. YI. STTiDY ITEMS 2303 TROUSDALE DRTVE _ ZONED R-1 _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A PRTVATE NON-PROFIT SCHOOL ON AN EXSTING SCHOOL SITE (ERUDITE.HOPE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, APPLICANT; KASTROP GROUP, NC., ARCHITECT; BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLA}..{NER: ERIKA LEWIT CP Monroe presented a summary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: what time in the morning do the various classes at Franklin Elementary begin in the morning? Ifthe new class is to be held in the computer lab, where will.the lab be relocate{ will it.be within the leased area? How will the taffic generated by the change compare to the current taffic generated by this use and the school; how does the additional traffic affect the congestion experienced at Franklin at the start of the school day now? Does the proposed 9:15 a.m. start conflict with the Franklin classes that begin at 9:30 a.m.? Has the principal at Franklin been consulted aboutthe change in start time? Have there been any complaints about the current student drop offlpick-up practices? There were no further questions. This item was set fortheconsentcalendarwhen all theinformationhas been submittedandreviewedbythe Planning Depmhnent. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m. I $,AMEI\D REGTJLATIONS TO EXTEND SECOIYDT]I\IIT AMI\TESTY PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE CP Monroe presented a summary of the staffreport, noting that this request was just to extend the present program so that the momentum created will continue. After the Housing Element is updatd the Second Unit program will be reviewed more completely and more extensive revisions to the program will be considered. April 22, 2002 Commissioners asked: could the extension be for 2 years rather than the 5 yems proposed? How are we promoting this program? Want to extend progr,rm in order to support and encourage it, but also want to be clear that still intend to review and consider modifications to make it better. Chairrran Vistica set this item for action at the next Planning Commission meeting, May 13,2002. This item concluded at7:16 p-m. VTI. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Itums on the consent calendqr are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chairrran Vistica asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item offthe consent calendar. There were no requests. 3A. 330 CLARENDON ROAD - ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STE}YARI STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICA}.IT AND ARCHITECT; JERRY AND JORDANA PEIL, PROPERTY OWNERS) (69 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATTIERINE KEYLON 38. 1320 SI(WIEW DRTVE - ZONED R.l . APPLICATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A}I ATTACIIED GARAGE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (SAMUEL A}{D ELAINE WONG, APPLICA}ITS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JOHN MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (44 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staffreports, commissioners comments and the findings in the staffreports with recommended conditions in the staffreports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 7-0-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:16 p.m. V[I. REGT}LAR ACTION ITEM 4.1540 HOWARD AYEI\IT]EI ZOXEN R.l _ APPLrcATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JOHN STEWART, STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; EARL GUSTAFSON, PROPERTY OWNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLA}.INER: SEAN O'ROIIRKE Reference staffreport,04.22.02, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report reviewed criteria and staffcomments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners had no questions of staff. Chairman Vistica opened the public heming. Eml Gustafson, I 540 Howard, property owner r€presented the project. He noted that in working on the design they extended the rem wall 2 feet inorder to be able to include an oversized bath tub, They also increased the dormer to break up the wall along the driveway and added knee braces; relocated the bedroom window to allow for the larger dormer. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. 2 City of B,trlrngame Planning Commission Unapprwed Minutes I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -9 10 lt t2 13 t4 15 t6 17 18 19 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 t ORDINANCE NO. ORDINAIYCE O[' TIIE CITY OF' BT]RLINGAME EXTEI\DING TIIE AMI\TESTY PERIOD ATID SPECIAL PERMIT PROCESS FOR SECOI\IDARY DWBLLING UI\ITS IN THE CITY The CITY COUNCIL of the CffY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section I . In May 2001 , the City adopted Ordinance No. 1653, which established an amnesty program for secondary dwelling units built before January l, 1954. The response to that amnestyprogram has been very limited, so the Citywishes to extend that amnestyprogram so that more participation will occur. Section 2. Section 25.59.040(a) is amended to read as follows: (a) Any person owning a secondary dwelling unit that was built as a dwelling unit not later than December 31, 1953, and that has been in substantially the same use and envelope since that time may apply to the city no later than June 30, 2006, for a special permit to legalize the existence, use, and occupancy of the secondary dwelling unit pursuant to this chapter. Section 3. Section 25.59.080 is amended to read as follows: 25.59.080 Time frame. Applications for ffiroval of a special permit shall be made on or befrrre lune 3O 2006. Any approved specialpermit thathas not complied within the time requirements contained in this section shall lapse and be of no further force and effect on June 30,2007. Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City ofBurlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day I .l I I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l t2 13 t4 15 16 t7 l8 t9 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of--, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day ot- 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: City Clerk C:\Fll!:)ORDINANC\econdrmit2.pln.vpd 2 STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May L4,2002 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 6b 5 t20to2 TO: DATE: FROM SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND ENFORCEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council retain the existing hours of construction for work performed under a building permit. BACKGROUND: Council and staff have received an e-mail from Mr. VandenBrink regarding consffuction noise. Mr. VandenBrink lives adjacent to an on-going, owner-built project at l42l Benito Avenue and indicates that he is unable to enjoy his property on weekends and holidays due to excessive consffuction noise. He is also concerned that the Police Deparftnent does not adequately enforce the existing ordinance with respect to consffuction hours. Mr. VandenBrink believes that Burlingame's construction hours are liberal in comparison to other jurisdictions and recommends that they be reduced on Saturdays. He further recommends that work under a building permit not be allowed on Sundays and holidays. DISCUSSION: Houns oF woRK Staff researched the limitations onhours of construction in 19 jurisdictions in San Mateo County. The results, shown in the attached survey and analysis, demonstrate ttrat Burlingame is average or more restrictive in permitted hours in almost every category (weekdays, Saturday, Sunday, start and stop times, and total hours). Only three jurisdictions (Atherton, Belmont and Woodside) prohibit all construction on Sundays and holidays; and of the remaining jurisdictions, only San Mateo has a later starting time. ENroRcptvtsNr Staff has reviewed the past three years of requests for Police Departrnent response to noise complaints in the City. Overall, the police responded to about 6,200 calls regarding noise disturbances. Forty-two calls appear to relate to construction noise between 4:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.; and, of these, 19 appear to be in an R-l zone or have an apparent effect on an R-l zone. Approximately one-half of these calls related to work that would require a construction permit from the City. Of all the construction-related noise calls, six involve construction on a Sunday or holiday; and two of these were in an R-l district. Staff also reviewed the Code Enforcement investigations over the past four years and found two construction-related noise calls: one involving work at an office building and the other involving Pacific Bell work on Hillside Drive. The Police Depatrnent attempts to respond to all calls for service regarding noise disturbances. Officers will first determine the nature of the possible violation and make contact with the reporting party (if available and willing) and then with the possible offender. Most of these are resolved when the person making the noise is informed of the problem or the time limitations. If the person making the noise does not comply and additional response is needed, officers can issue citations. In some cases, the officer is not able to issue a citation because he/she did not witness the noise occurring or simply did not believe there was sufficient information or basis to issue a citation. In those instances, a report is sent to ttre City Attorney's office for review and follow up. Page 2 SUMMARY: Given the needs of a homeowner performing his/her own work, the rights of neighbors to reasonable peace in the early mornings and evenings and everyone's interest in expediting projects to completion, it appears that the current hours provide a reasonable balance and are in alignment with San Mateo County jurisdictions. In addition, research indicates that there are very few calls regarding consffuction-related noise in and adjacent to residential areas; and the Police Departrnent has been able to resolve most of these by talking to the affected parties. Staff believes that the noise issue at l42l Bemto Avenue is a special circumstance involving a long term weekend construction project which does not merit modifying construction hours for the entire City. Rather, staff believes that this issue can best be addressed through a mediation process. As a result, Police Commander Tom Marriscolo met with Mr. Funghi, the owner-builder, and adjacent neighbors, Mr. VandenBrink and Mrs. Cody, on May 7,2002, to mediate an acceptable solution to the noise issue. Several agreements were made at the meeting, and the Police Department will continue to monitor the situation and be available to facilitate any further mediation. Staff also met with Mr. Vanderbrink on May 14,2002, to discuss the attached survey of consffuction hours prepared by the Chief Building Official. At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. VanderBrink indicated that, irrespective of his situation, he still believes that residents should not be exposed to construction noise on Sundays. EXHIBITS: Mr. VandenBrink's E-Mail; Construction Hours Survey and Analysis BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budget impact to the City. 6s0-558-7230 c: City Clerk, Police Department, Fred Cullum (Chief Building Official) Mr. VandenBrink, l4l2 Alvarado Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 Mr. Funghi, I42l Benito Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 Mrs. Cody , 1416 Alvarado Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010 S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reporu\Construction Hours.wpd PWIENG-Bagdon, George From: Sent:'- To? Cc: Randy VandenBrink [vandenbr@pacbell.netl Frk ay, March 22,2002 3:49 PM council@bu.lingame.org Janice VardenBrink ydoc@pacbell.net; Fcullum@hirlingam€.org; PWENe,Bagdon, George; ATW-Anderson, Lany Burlingsme Conslrudion HoursSubiec{: lmpo anc6:Hish city Council of Burlingame 501. Primrose Rd Burlingame, cA 94 010 Dear council Memlrers, f would like to request that the counci-I take under consjderation a revision to the allowable hours of constructlon for Burllngame, Burlingame today, has (l.)the least restllctive hours of constructlon of all the towns on the Peninsula, (2) a very poor definltion of !,rhat ' constltutes construction and (3) what appears to be a total lack of enforcenent of it's exJ-sting rules. Background On my block we have been subjected Eo almost constant 7 day a week construction for over a year and a half due to several ' coDstruction jobs,ilost have worked during the week and adhered to the allowed hours of construction. llowever, in Apri.l of 2000 the Planning Comnission approved a 5900 square foot house on a 8000 square foot lot at 1421 Benito. The owuer of that house had lobbied his neighbors for support stating that hl-Eintentiols were to be done by Christma6. Instead the owner, who is acting ashis own contractor, has ONLY worked weekends and Holidays and has consistently vioLated the exiating haurs of construction in excess of 30 times. I and seweral of my nelghbors have discussed his violatioos of the hours of construclion with him, but seem to be j-gnored each time. Afterseveral of these dlscussions we have started to notify the Burlingame Pollceof each infraction. I have cal.Led the police 6-7 times, and L-.krrow my neighbors have called a sinilar nunber of times. Ilowever, it appears thatthe Burllngame police have a poLicy to not wrLte citations. In fact on Sqnday, Uarch 10th, the officer that responded specifically toLd ny neighbors that they were wasting his 'tj,me in making these calls, and that he had better thlngs to do. Ilhen I asked whether the violators were ever cltedI rdas informed that I vre donit do thatr. ObviousLy a ordinance that is not enforced has little value. corq)arisoDs In researching what the policy of other citiea on the Peninsula are j.n thisarea I discovered several areas where Burlingame's code needs to be upgraded. First Burlingame alLows the second highest nu0ber of hours ofconstructioB of aLl the cities that I surveyed. I obtained the hours ofconstructlon either from the police or building web pages and or by callingthe police or building depaltnent of tlrese clties. -otal - Hours- The average al]-o$ed hours of coDstruction for the 13 citles 1-,urveyed vras 60,5. Burlinga[e a11ows 77 hours or 28 percent more than mostci.ties in our a.rea. 1 Monday-Eriday Hours- Burlingame again a1lows the longest, both earLiest and latest, period of constructlon of all the cities surveyed. The average period across all the cities is 7130 am to 6100 pm. Burlingame allows 7 to 7. Saturday - Again Burlingame has the distinction of allowing the fatest stop time and the highest nurnber of hours. Five cities prohibit Saturday construction, the rest average a 8:45 start time and a 5 pm stop. Burlingamejust changed to 9 am to 5 pm. Sunday and Holidays - Eleven of the L3 jurisdictions totally ban cotrstruction on Sundays and Holidays. OnIy Hillbrae and Burling€rme allow it! The following table shows the city by city corrparison. City Total M-F Sat Sun/Holiday Burlingame Millbrae Hillsborough Menl-o Park San Mateo City San Mateo County Lsir Altos Atherton Mountain View Redwood City Sunnlruale !{oodside Palo A].to 7am-?pm7:30am-7pm8am-5pm8am-5pm7am-7pm7am-6pm 7 am - 5:30 pm8am-5pm7am-5pm7am-8pm7am-6pm 7:30am - 5r30pm8am-6pm 9am-6pm 8am-6pm 10am-5pm Prohibited 9 am- S-pm 9am*5pm 9am-3pm Prohibited Perrnit Needed Prohibited 8am-5pm Prohibited 9am-6pm 1.0am-5prn 8am-6pm Prohibited Prohibited Prohibi-ted Prohibited ( ? ) Prohibited Prohibited Perruit Needed Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited 77 77.5 52 45 68 63 58.5 45 55 65 64 55 59 Proposal for hours of Construction I would propose that Burlingame change it's allowable hours of construction\- to the foll-owi-ng periods of time. Monday - Friday 7:00 am to 6 pm Saturday 1.0 am to 4 pm Sunday / Holidays Prohibited This would put Burlingame slightly above the average of total hours for thecities surveyed. My rational for these hours is as follows: t"{:-E -= Residents have a rlght to be able to have their neighborhood free ofnorse and construction activity during meal time, especially dinner. rbelieve a 5 pm stop would allow most farnllies to have a more peacefuldinner. In addition it would clear the streets of construction activity bythe time most people get home from work. Saturday - one should be able to not be woken up on Saturdays by constantconstruction noise. fn addj-tion since Saturday evening is the tj-me that asignificant amount of entertaining occurs one should be able to freely useyour house and yard. For the last year and a half every outdoor party thatmy wife and I have held has been intemupted by construction noise. I feelthat r have the right to enjoy my house and yard without such a ongoingnui-sance. The late stop time is especially annoying since one is unable toplan any social events. Sunday and Holidays- There needs to be one day a week where one is free fromhaving to worry about hanuners and sawing and constant construction activity.Over the last 2 years we have endured construction on the Fourth of JuIylwice, we have had Thanksgiving dinner to the sound of Bobcat demolition \_ nce, on Christmas we have had to wonder whether we would or would not have- construction noise. A11 other Holidays have been held to the sound of sawsand harnmers, etc. We are in the position of having to leave home to avoi-d 2 . tfte nuisance. I do not believe that any Burlingame resident should even have to worry about this on Sundays and Holidays' Definition of Construction- There must be an aEreed upon definition of what construction is, not a series of differring opioions by police officers and residents. tos Altos defines the criteria as tsuch that the sound therefrom creates a noise dlsturbance across a residential property line ...' This definition means that cleanup, loading unloading, and prep work that can be heard must fit within the allowable hours. The contractor qannot unload lumber for an hour before and clean up an hour later than the posted times. Atherton and Hiltsborough also define construction in terms of being able to hear activity across the property line. Several cltes have very defined decibel levels. In many it is any work that is beinq done under a building pennit. I believe that a sirqple definition of any activity that can be heard or seen across the property line makes the most sense. It is sirtple and understandable. It is inrportant that the exact activities do not matter. A bobcat unloading and moving materials, a truck with back-up bells, or clean up working throwing scraps in a duqpster, or a street fu}l of construction vehi"les are as disturbing as a --w and hanmer.The definition needs to be such that there are not 6 workers on site an hour before of after the defined allowable times. Enforcement- Whatever the ordinance there MUST be some penalty associated with violations. The current hands-off policy by the Burlingame Police for violations is especially frustrating. In this area PaIo Alto makes violations a rnisdemeanor punishable by six months in jail or $1000 fine, or both. Atherton gives a warning, and then increasing fines of $100r$200rand 1500. I would propose a warning for the first offense, and then significant fines and preferably action relating to the issuance of the building permit. Continual violations shouLd lead to the revocation of the building permit, and perhaps any planning perrnits or variances associated with the project. Without a real and enforced penalty contractors and owners will corrtinue to ignore the rules as they do today. I would ask that this item be addressed in a timely manner. As sunmer is approaching the level of the syi ct-irlg nuisance for homeowners on Alvarado and Benito Avenues needs to be arrdressed. I would also note that I believe that the vast majority of contractors alteady abide by the hours that I am proposing, and that the impact of these changes would be rninimal for overall construction. Sincerely yours, Randy VandenBrink 1412 Alvarado Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 Phone Horue (650) 579-0554 celI (650) 678-s280 3 \- SURVEY OF CONSTRUCTION HOURS Weekda), 7-7 Saturdav Sunday/Holida), 9-6 10-6Burlingame Atherton Belmont Brisbane Daly City East Palo Alto Foster City Half Moon Bay Hillsborough Menlo Park Millbrae Pacifica Portola Valley San Bruno San Mateo South San Francisco San Carlos RedwoodCity Woodside 8-5 8-5 7-7 None None t0-5 None 9-7 9-7 Construction allowed anytime for non-major projects (less than a subdivision) unless determined to be a 'onuisance" Construction allowed anytime for non-major projects (less than a suMivision' uriless determined to be a "nuisance" 7:30-8 8-5:30 7-10 7-7 7-6 7-8 Construction allowed anytime if below lr0db 7:30-5:30 8-l None Construction allowed anytime if not deter- mindtobe"excessive" 7:30-7 7-6 8-5 8-6 7-7 9-8 l0-6 None 9-5 8-6 9-5 10-5 7-10 12-4 10-6 9-5 9-8 8-6 l0-5 9-5 8-6 9-5 9-5:30 7-10 9-5 9-8 9-5 8-8 9-5 \- San Mateo County \-. 7-6 ANALYSIS OT' CONSTRUCTION HOI]RS The City has obtained the construction hours for weekdays, Saturday and Sunday from 19 other jurisdictions located in San Mateo County as indicated in the attachment. Ofthese jurisdictions, four (Atherton, Belmont Hillsborough and Woodside) ban consEuction on Sundays; and only Atherton bans consfruction on Saturdays. Following is a comparison of Burlingame hours with other jurisdictions: Weekdays Starting time in Burlingame: 7 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m to 8 a.m. ' Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive, and l0 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 7:45 a.m.* Stopping time in Burlingame: 7 p.m.. Set stopping times range from 5 p.m. to l0 p.m. ' Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average stopping time is 6:30 p.m.* Total number of hours in Burlingame: 12 hours. Total hours range from t hours to 15 hours* ' Nine jurisdictions ure more restrictive, and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average total number of hours is I l.l hours* Saturday Starting time in Burlingame: 9 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m. to l0 a.m. ' Three jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 16 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 9 a.m.* Stoppine time in Burlingame: 6 p.m. ' Set stopping times ftrnge from I p.m. to l0 p.m. ' Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restictive or the same. Average stopping time is 5:45 p.m.* Total number of hours in Burlingame: t hours. Total hours range from 7 hours to 15 hours* ' Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average total number of hours is t hours* \-. Sunday Starting time in Burlingame: l0 a.m.. Set starting times range from 7 a.m. to 12 noon. Five jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 14 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same. Average starting time is 9:30 a.m.* Stooping time in Burlingame: 6 p.m. . Set stopping times range from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. . Nine jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 10 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same . Average stopping time is 6 p.m.* Total number of hours in Burlingame: 8 hours. Total hours r:rnge from 4 hours to 15 hours*. Six jurisdictions are more restrictive, and 13 jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same . Average total number of iir'-rs is 8.8 hours* Total hours range from 45 hours to 105 hours** Ten jurisdictions are more restrictive, and nine jurisdictions are less restrictive or the same Average number ofhours is 70 hows*** includes only the jurisdictions with set times doesnotincludethe fourjurisdictiorswhichallowconstuctionanytime onvariousdays. Ifthese jurisdictions are include., ' re range is 45 hours to 163 hours doesnot includethe fourjurisdictionswhichallowconstuctionanytime onvariousdays. Ifthese jurisdictions are included, the average number ofhours is 83 hours. Summary of All Days Weekly total number of hours in Burlinsame: 77 hours I STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 10,2002 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20to2 6d TO: DATE: FROM SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SETTING TIME LIM|TS FOR PARK|NG FREE LOTS F AND H AND INTRODUCING AN ORDINANCE TO GRANT AUTHORITY TO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO TOW VEHICLES FROM CITY PARKING LOTS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that Council: ' Approve the attached resolution setting a24-hour maximum time limit for parking in lots F and H. ' Introduce an Ordinance to grant authority to the Police Department to tow vehicles stored at or blocking City parking lots by: l. Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the attached ordinance.2. Waiving funher reading of the proposed ordinance. 3. lntroducing the proposed ordinance. 4. Directing the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before its proposed adoption. BACKGROTIND: In Novemb er 2001 ,Council approved the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area Parking Plan which included free parking in Lots F and H, parking lot improvements and signage as well as parking rate increases. The purpose of the free lots is to encourage long term parking in the outlying areas, thus freeing up spaces near the Burlingame Avenue Core area for short term parkers. DISCUSSION: Since the implementation of free parking in Lots F and H, it has been observed that the long term parkers are highly attracted by these lots; and the lots are usually full by 8:00 a.m. on weekdays. The City has reieived complaints from downtown business employees that some vehicles are left in these lots for extended time periods causing a limited supply of free parking for employees. As a result, staff completed a one-week license plate survey of vehicles parked in Lots F and H to determine if there is an abuse of free parking. The attached survey results show that there is an average of 21 (21.2o/o) vehicles found to be parked in the same spaces, unmoved, in Lot F and 9 (10.7%) vehicles in Lot H on weekdays. Although the percentage of vehicles parked in these free lots for an extended time is not significantly high, to prevent abuse of free parking, staffrequests that Council approve the attached resolution to limitparking to a 24-hourmaximum time period. Approval of this resolution will grant the Police Department the authority io tickel the vehicles which are parked beyond the prescribed time limit. The proposed ordinance will give the Police Department the same authority to tow vehicles from City parking lots that the Department has on public streets that are parked longer than 72 consecutive hours as well as to tow vehicles from lots that are obstructing the traffic lanes or where- parking is prohibited. Staff will be performing a study of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area in the fall of 2OO2to assess the impact of the parking rate increase, free parking in Lots F and H, and its affect on parking supply and demand. Staff will bring the results of the study to the Council along with any recommended modifications to the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area Parking Plan. EXHIBITS : Resolution; Ordinance; Survey Results BUDGET IMPACT: None. c: City Clerk, Police Department Dept., Rita Chafee, John Pivirotto C:\Docunrents and Settings\andersonVlcal Settings\Tenpomry Intemet Files\OLKlB\Free Lots Time Limit and ordinance.wpd 'r' 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 15 t6 l7 18 t9 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE No. ORDINAIICE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE TOWING OF VEHICLES FROM CITY PARKING LOTS The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The City of Burlingame has purchased and improved a number of parking lots to serve the community, and these parking lots must be available for use as parking facilities and not for the storage of vehicles or to avoid airport and other transit parking facilities. This ordinance will ensure that law enforcement has the authority to remove vehicles that are interfering with the use of those parking or that are being stored at the lots. Section 2. A new section 13.04.125 is added as follows: 13.04.125 Parking lots or facilities, city, municipal, or public. "City parking lot," "city parking facility," "municipal parking lot," "municipal parking facility," ' public parking lot," or "public parking facility'' means an off-street area or structure that is owned, leased by, operated by, or operated on behalf of the city for the purpose of parking by the general public, with or without compensation. A parking lot or parking facility in the city that is controlled by a public agency other than the city shall be treated as a private off-street parking facility under this title. Section 3. Section 13.08.090 is amended to read as follows: 13.08.090 When vehicles maybe removed from streets and public parking lots or iacilities. Any police officer may remove or cause to be removed: (a) Any vehicle that has been parked or left standing upon a street, ot highway, or ptrblic parking lot or t-acility for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours; (b) Anyvehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street, or highway, or public parking lot or lacility when such parking or standing is prohibited by ordinance or resolution of this city or upon any designated fire lane and signs are posted giving notice of such removal. Signs upon fire lanes on private property shall be prepared and posted at the owner's expense; 1t!1912001 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 15 16 17 18 t9 20 2l 22 Z) 24 25 26 27 28 (c) Any vehicle which is parked or left standing upon a street,or highway, or public parking lot or facility where the use of such street, or highway, or public parking lot or facil ity or a portion thereof is necessary for cleaning, repair or construction ofthe streetpr highway, or public parking lot or tbcility, or for the installation of underground utilities or where the use of the street or highway or anyportion thereof is authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic, or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles or structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicles would prohibit or interfere with such use or movement, provided that signs giving notice that such vehicle may be removed are erected or placed at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the removal. Section 4. Section 13.36.049 is amended to read as follows 13-36.049 Moving vehicles in public parking lots or facilities and use of public parking lots or facilities for storage of vehicles. (a) It is unlawful for anyperson to move a vehicle within a municipal parking lot so that it remains therein for a period of time in violation of Section 13.36.050. Any vehicle observed at two or more parking spaces in the parking facility within such a period of time and having an observed odometer change of less than one-tenth miles shall be presumed to have remained within such lot; a vehicle observed at two or more parking spaces in the parking facility within such a period of time and with the odometer obscured from view from without the vehicle shall be rebuttably presumed to have remained stationary. (b) It is unlawful for any person who owns or has possession, custody, or control of any vehicle, to park or leave such vehicle upon any mimicipal parking lot for a period of sevent.v-trvo (72) consecutive hours or more. For purposes of this subsection, a vehicle shall be considered to have been parked or left stancling for seventy{ivo (72) or more cotxecutive hours if it iras not been moved at least one-tenth of a mile during the seventy-two (72) hour period. A vehicle rvith the odometer obscured from view trorn without the vehicle shall be rebuttably presumed to have remained stationary. .)rU19t200l I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1l t2 13 l4 15 16 17 18 t9 20 27 22 Z) 24 25 26 27 28 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of -,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COI,NCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COI-INCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C : \FILES\ORDINANC\parkinglottowing.pwd.wpd 31111912001 The City of Burlingame PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TEL:(650) 558-7230 CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O-3997 LICENSE PLATE S ON PARKING LOT F & H DATE & TIME LOT F TOTAL SPACES 98 PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLES PARKED EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME LOT H TOTAL SPACES 86 PERCENTAGE OF' VEHICLES PARKED EXTENDED PERIOD OT'TIME r-29-02 TO l-30-02 6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM 2l 2r.42%8 9.3% r-29-02 TO l-30-02 6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM 22 22.45%9 r0.46% t-29-02 TO l-30-02 6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM 22 22.45%9 10.46% r-29-02 TO l-30-02 6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM t7 17.34%8 9.3% r-29-02 TO l-30-02 6:00 PM TO 9:30 AM 22 22.45%12 13.95% AVERAGE 2t 2t.22%9 t0.69% AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20t2002 6c STAFF REPORT TO:Honorable Mavor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE:Mav 13.2002 BY FROM: Larry E. Andersou,elbr CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF ORDINAIICE AMENDING THE MASSAGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW THE RELEASE OF THE SURETY BOND FOLLOWING 24 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF LAWFUL OPERATION UNDER THE PERMIT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Consider introduction of ordinance reducing the surety bond requirements for massage practitioners following 24 consecutive months of lawful operation, and if acceptable to the Council, introduce ordinance by A. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 5 days before proposed adoption. DISCUSSION: At the }day 20 Council meeting, the Council heard from a massage practitioner who had concems that the current Code requirements (Chapter 6.40) put a difficult financial burden on massage practitioners by requiring the posting of a permit bond, regardless of the nature of the practice. Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would reduce this requirement by allowing the bond to be released following a period of successful operation in the City. The proposed ordinance would provide that following 24 months of operation without suspension or filing of a complaint against the business by the district attomey, city attorney, Attorney General, or U.S. attorney, the bond would be released upon request of the permitholder. There are other possible approaches 1) Allow the Chief of Police to waive the requirement for a surety bond for limited period of time under limited circumstances, such as: a) documented inability to afford the bond; and b) demonstrated ability and experience to meet the requirements of the regulations. This could include a required deposit in lieu of the bond for an amount determined from the financial statement. Mayor and Council Re: Consider lntroduction of Ordinance Regarding Posting of Permit Bond by Massage Practitioners May 13,2002 Page2 2) Reduce the amount of bond required by the ordinance. This may have a very small benefit, because the base price of the bond, no matter the amount, is often the largest charge. As discussed at the previous meeting, the bond requirement provides a number of important protections to the community: 1) An applicant who is able to obtain a bond has demonstrated a commitment to the profession, an ability to satisfy the financial requirements of surety company, and a willingness to stand behind the business; 2) The community has assurance that there is a fund available in case of malpractice or misfeasance; and 3) The City's taxpayers have recourse to a fund for enforcement actions. The tough regulations adopted by the City in 1993 have served the City well. Staff urges that any changes be made with great care. Attachment Proposed ordinance Distribution Chief of Police Elizabeth Graham Gina La Rocca 1 2 -) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 15 t6 t7 18 19 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING SECTION 6.40.115 TO ALLOW THE RELEASE OF A SURETY BOND FOR A MASSAGE PERMITHOLDER AFTER TWENTY.FOUR MONTHS OF LAWFUL OPERATION UNDER THE PERMIT The CITY COLINCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section l. In 1993, the City adopted a comprehensive ordinance to regulate massage practitioners in the City because many massage operations had been seized by organized crime and were fronts for thievery and prostitution. The ordinance has been very successful, although criminal elements continue to seek ways around the ordinance as reflected in other communities' current problems in Santa Clara County. However, the ordinance does place restrictions on the legitimate practice ofmassage as well. A massage practitioner has requested the City Council to consider reducing the impact on legitimate operators by limiting the requirement for a surety bond. This ordinance is in response to that request and is based on a permitholder's conformance to State and local laws while operating a massage business in the City over a demonstrated period of time. This reduction is subject to change by ordinance amendment at any time if this reduction is used by criminal elements to bring illicit massage operations back to the City. Section 2. Section 6.40.115 is amended to read as follows: 6.40.115 Surety bond. (a) Every applicant for an operator's permit shall post with the city clerk, a surety in the principal sum amount of ten thousand either in cash or executed as surety by a good and sufficient corporate surety authorized to do a surety business in the state of California and as principal by the applicant. The form of the bond shall have been approved by the city attorney and shall provide that should the applicant be issued a permit under this chapter which is subsequently suspended or revoked, the city shall be reimbursed from said bond for all costs of said any investigation or other proceedings related to said suspension or revocation. 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 l4 15 I6 t7 18 19 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) If a holder of a pennit under this chapter successfully cornpletes twenty-four (24), consecutive months in actnal operation under the permit withottt any suspension of the pemrit or the filing of any criminal or civil complaint regarding operations under the permit by eitlrer a city attorney, a district attorney, the California Attorney General, or a United States Attorney, the permitliolder rnay request the city to release the surety bond, rvhich the city shall do upon verification that no such suspension or complaint filing lras occurred during the period. Holvever, if at any time following such a release of the surety bond, the city determines that the permitholder is corrducting its operations in violation of this chapter, the chief of police may order the posting of a surety bond in accortlance with subsection (a) abot e as a condition of continued operations under the permit. Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the -day of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of--,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COLINCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME SETTING TIME LIMITS FOR PARKING LOTS F AND H RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME, California, that: WHEREAS, Municipal Code title 13 provides the framework for regulating the City's parking lots; and WHEREAS, this Council has from time to time established regulations for time limitations and charges for various City parking lots, most recently in Resolution No. I 3 1 -2001 ; and WHEREAS, offering free parking in certain lots has encouraged employees ofbusinesses to use that parking and leave closer-in parking for greater tumover use by customers; and WHEREAS, it has also allowed persons to park vehicles in the lots with free parking for overly extended periods of time; and WHEREAS, a reasonable time limitation will accommodate both employees and nearby residents while preventing storage of vehicles or longer term parking, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: 1. No person shall park any vehicle on City parking lot F or H for longer than a period of twenty-four (24) hours. 2. These time limitations shall supersede any and all such limitations and hours adopted by prior resolutions of this Council. 3. The Director ofPublic Works is hereby authorized and directed to procure and install appropriate signs giving notice of the provisions of this resolution. 15/1012002 af,r 4. Thetime limitations setforthinthis resolutionshall beoperativeupontheinstallation ofsuch signs. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifl, that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COIINCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK z5/10/2002 -a STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: May9,20A2 FRoM: Randy Schwartz (650) 558-7307 Director of Parks & Recreation AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE s/20102 7a BY BY d suBJEcr: Washington Park Ballfield Renovation - City Project # 80190 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting as complete the work done by Scapes Landscape, Inc. at the Washington Park Ballfield. BACKGROUND: The Washington Park Ballfield Renovation project was completed on May 3, 2002 inaccordance with the plans and specifications approved by Council for this project and to the satisfaction of the Dept. staffand our project architect. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution accepting completion of the Washington Park Ballfield Renovation project. BUDGET IMPACT: Original contract amount: Change orders (drainage issues) $l18,750 0 Total contract amount:$118,750 106.875 $11,875 Amount paid to date: Final payment: Final payment of the contract will be paid upon approval of this resolution. Sufficient funds are available to complete this project. --f i -' NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING COMPLETION OF WASHINGTON PARK BALLFIELD RENOVATION CITY PROJECT NO. 80190 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, Califomia, and this Council does herebyFlND, ORDER and DETERMINE as follows: l. The Parks & Recreation Director of said City has certified that the work done by SCAPES. /NC underthetermsofitscontractwiththeCityofBurlingamedatedOctoberlT,200l.has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by this Council therefor and to the satisfaction of the Parks & Recreation Director. 2. Said work is particularly described as #80190 WASHINGTON PARK BALLFIELD RENOVATION. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. 4. The city engineer is directed to execute and file for record with the County Recorder notice of the completion thereof as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2ff dav of Mav 2002. and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS City Clerk STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 9, 2OO2 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20t02 7b TO: DATE: FROM SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTTON AWARDTNG A CONSTRUCTTON CONTRACT TO TR|N CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION , cP 80510 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding the construction contract to Trinet Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,031,610 for the California/Grove Area Storm Drain Pump Station. BACKGROUND: Six bids for the project were opened on May l, 2002, ranging from $1,143,660 to $1,389,366. The bid of Trinet Construction, Inc. was recalculated from $1,166,610 to $1,031,6L0 due to an arithmetical error involving the total amount for clearing and grubbing work. As a result, Trinet Construction, Inc. is the low bidder with a price of $1,031,610 which is 12% above the engineer's estimate. Trinet Construction, Inc. has met all the requirements for the project and has a past history of satisfactory work for the City and other public agencies. The project consists of 350 feet of storm drain pipe, storm drain inlets, manhole structures, new pumps and a standby generator. The project will increase the capacity of the storm drain system in the California/Grove area to 30 years and thereby alleviate chronic flooding problems in the area. The project construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in June 2002 and be completed by December 2002, weather permitting. EXHIBITS: Resolution; Bid Summary; Location Map; Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: The estimated construction phase costs are as follows Construction Contingency (15%) Construction Phase Professional Services Total Estimated Construction Phase Cost $1,031,610 $ 155,000 $17s.000 $1,361,610 There are adequate funds in the CIP Budget to complete the project. Douglas Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance Director Trinet Construction, Inc. S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\805 10 AwardTrinet May2002.wpd CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION TRINET CONSTRUCTION. INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 80510 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 80510; and WHEREAS, on May l, 2002, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., submitted the lowest responsible bid for thejob in the amount of $1,031,610. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, thar the plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., for said project in the amount of $1,031,610; and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and thatth9Cily Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor and materiali bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: S:\A Public Work Directory\PROIECTS\805lo\ResolutrAward.wpd City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. BID RESULT TABULATION SPREADSHEET, MAy 1, 2002, 2:00 pM Cellfomle Grcve tltonn Dnln Pump Strtlon Clty of Burllngamc Pn4.ct No. 80510 Trln.t Connmlon lnc. Condr. lnc. Stom Engi Contnctor lnc.NCCI, lnc. Itam No. Eatim{aa Unit Pdca Unil Pric. TMI Ahouil Unlt TOht Amount Unlt Prlca Totrl Unh TOIt unal Pric. TOEI Amount 3 dbposel t00 LF 3 5m 3 lno m s 50.00 I 5000m t 1E.00 t 1.800.00 3 aom 3 loonm 3 10.00 s 1.000.00 3 10.00 s 't.000.00 1 Fumkh a lnstell Slom Ddln Plm . 12' dl,F $85.00 s 5 720 00 s 100.00 s 8.800.00 s 280 00 3 3 120.00 s 10 560 00 3 100 00 3 A AOO OO llo oo t) 7ro on 8 Fumbh a lnst.ll Stom Doin Pie. 18'di..11 F 3 E0.(x)s 3.280 00 s 235 00 t s,635.00 3 270.00 3 11 070 00 3 25A nO t 10.378.00 3 300 00 s t2 3m 00 3 r80 00 s 6S000 I 51 LF s 12S m I 8.375.00 s 300.00 t 15 300 00 $ 2E0.00 3 14.280.00 s 247 ffi s 1a 837 00 $325.00 3 16.575.00 3 180.00 s e 180.00 10 Fumbh t lnstril Slom Dmh Plil. 30'di.F t 150.m 3 21 750 00 i 230.00 s 33.350.00 3 2eo oo 3 D O50 0a t 230.00 3 33.350.00 s 260 00 t 36 250 0n ,io 06 30 lqo ao Fumkh a hstafl Stom OEln Plo€ . 48' dia.1A LF s 2Sm I amm s 6amoo t 600.00 3 0.600 m 3 t 375.00 3 6.000.00 I 220.00 t 3.520.00 3 Entire Pump Statlon Earlhwort, Compl€t&ln da@, Fin.l Pay (State Smc 0.,l,015),300 CY 3 30m t 95.00 3 125mm 3 Bl oo I 6.t.500.00 t 110 Sm OO t llq oo I 50.00 3 65.000.00 t5 MCC/StoreOe Buildln! Found.tion & Rool Completlln-PlE@ 51 CY s 4mm s 20 {oo oo 3 750.00 38.250 00 s 700 m t 35.700.00 s 905.00 t ta 155 00 s I OOO 06 s 5r ooo oo 7no no 15 700 m 16 Mcc/Slorage Buildlm Blsk walls, Doo6, Veils, .m Paiil, ComdotltFPt @ 2'Welar S6d lnsienellon & Metedrls $,t8,000.00 3 46.000 m 3 * ooo oo $ 36.000.00 t 35.000.00 s 33 000 00 s tlomooo I 110.000.00 3 40.000.00 3 a0 000 00 t 73 000 m 3 ?5 000 00 1A Emergoncl conrrator Fouhddion, Compl6t6 ln.Ph6 15 CY s 1m oo 3 ,r.500.m s 500 00 3 7 500 00 s 350.00 s 525000 3 450 m I q 7to oo t 525.00 $7.075.00 3 700.00 t 10.500.00 ?o rump staton tsbdnqt & oodrcb, CmpbtliFPls6 1 LS s lilmm 3 194,000.00 3 170.000 00 t 170000m t 217.500.00 I 217.500.00 s 172 000 m 3 172 0m m 3 rt5 mo no t 155,000.00 t 250.000.00 $250.000.00 21 1 LS 3 85.000 00 3 85 mO OO I 50.000.00 t 50.000.00 $78 m0 00 s 7A OOO OO I 42.000.00 s {2.000 00 3 50mm 3 50 000 m s 70 000 m s 70 mo o0 ))1 EA s 25mOm I 100,000.00 5 38 7S0 00 s 155 000 00 t s7.000.00 5 228.000.00 s 35 000 m s lao ooo oo s 1E0,000.00 3 75.000.00 $300.000.00 27 1 LS 3 15.0m.00 t l5mOm 3 1 500m t 1.500.00 s a 300 00 s a 300 00 t 1,E00.00 3 1.t00.00 3 5000m 3 5 000 00 s 30moo s 3000m 21 FO@ MAaO Pipam am valws, complet+iF Pla@ 1 s s a5 000 00 3 45.000.00 s 4a o00 00 s 46 000 00 t 13.000.00 t 13.000.00 3 57 000 m 3 57 ono oo s 70,@0.00 5 70.000.00 3 20.000.00 s 20.000.00 25 Pum Sletl66 AC Pr$nd Comd.r.-idplr^,81 Tons t 85 00 s a 485 00 t 200.00 s 16 200 00 s 300 00 t 24.300.00 t 74.00 t 5 991 00 I l20m 3 0 720 00 3 ao oo a aao oo 28 Complete-in-Plac6 2AO CY $30.00 3 8.400.00 3 30 00 t 8,400.00 $85.00 3 23 800 00 s 20 00 t 6,120.00 s 55.00 3 15.a00.00 3 40.00 $1 L200.00 2E wod Em06 & Foundstion, complete-in- Pla@ s 3 lo 000 00 s 10.000.00 s I {00 00 3 6.400.00 $ 6.500.00 s 850000 s 25 000 00 s 25,000.00 3 14.000.00 $1,a.000.00 $ 30.000.00 $ 30.000.00 29 1 LS s 25m0m 3 ?5 000 00 t 't5.500.00 $15 500 00 3 1000000 $ 10,000.00 3 23.000.00 s 23 000 00 3 16 000 00 s !6 000 00 ,o noo oo 20 000 m 30 Sscked Concrcte Slope Protedion, Comoldo.in-Plee t 20.000.00 3 20 m0 00 3 a ooo oo $ E.000.00 3 I 500 00 s 9 500 00 $ il.000.00 3 1't.000.00 s 25 000 00 I 25 000 00 s 30 m0 00 s 30 000 00 TOTAL BIO mMS ilot. I tftoogh tl:I r,o3l,at0.00 I l,l,.t,3a0.0o I t,'t6?,t30.00 I t,l67,liL,00 t t,3r!,t20.00 t r,ltt,366.0o NoL3: t. Coruded orcntlon vrluo, BId 2. Comctod o)donslon rluc, 8ld [rm #1, Tdoct CoNtr. lnc. llm;i10, llccl, lnc. CALIF STORMWATER PUMP STATION CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY PROJEGT NO. 80510 f/\:--*:lV PNOJECTSITE + iprPi;$ ;i +.+"lo !..-f ! VICIMTYMAP ffioM NUmffi.(]rro \ ri$ PROJECT SITE .}, AGREEMENT FOR PIJBLIC IMPROVEMENT CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION CITY PROJECT NO. 80510 THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, CountyofSanMateo,StateofCaliforniaon-,2002,byandbetweenthe CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., hereinafter called "Contractor," WITNESSETH: WIIERBAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract; and WIIEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly pubtished for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and WIIERBAS, on MAY 20,2002, after notice duly given, the City Council of Burlingame awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which the Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for these improvements; and WIIEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the construction of said improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parries hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. Contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled: CALIFORNIA/ GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION, CITY JOB NO. 80510. AGREEMENT - 1 2. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement, Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this project by State law, the accepted Bid Proposal, the complete plans, profiles, detailed drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents. A11 rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. 3. Contract Price. The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in fuIl, payment of the work above agreed to be done, the sum of ONE MILLION, THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 dollars ($1,031,610.00). This price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents. 4. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. 5. Notices. A11 notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid. AGREEMENT - 2 Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows: TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2560 Marin Street San Francisco, CA 94t24 6. Interpretation. As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and vice versa. 7. Waiver or Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor. IN WITNESS WIDREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF BURLINGAME, a Municipal Corporation Bv ''CONTRACTOR'' Approved as to form: ATTEST: City Clerk City Auorney AGREEMENT - 3 Rv AGREEMENT f,'OR PUBLIC IMPROYEMENT CALIFORNIA/GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION CMY PROJECT NO. 80510 TIIIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California on_,2ffi2,by and between the CITY OF BIJRLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC., hereinafter called "Contractor, " WITNESSETII: WfffnnlS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract; and WIIEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and WIUREAS, on MAY 20, 2002, after norice duly given, the City Council of Burlingame awarded the coftract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which the Council found to be tle lowest responsible bidder for these improvements; and WIIEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the construction of said improvements, NOW, TIIEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties herero as follows: 1. Scooe of work contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled: CALIFORMA/ GROVE AREA STORM DRAIN PT]MP STATION, CITY JOB NO. 80510. AGREEMENT.l 2. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement, Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this project by State law, the accepted Bid Proposal, the complete plans, profiles, detailed drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents. All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. 3. Contract Price. The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above agreed to be done, the sum of ONE MILLION, THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 dollars ($1,031,610.00). This price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents. 4. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. 5. Notices. All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid. AGREEMENT - 2 Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF BI'RLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as fo[[ows: TRINET CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2560 Marin Sreet San Francisco, CA 9417+ 6. Interpretation. As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and vice versa 7. Waiver or Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF BT'RLINGAME, a Municipal Corporation Bv CONTRACTOR By Approved as to form: ATTEST: City Clerk City Attorney AGREEMENT - 3 STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED May 9, 2OO2 BY APPROVED PUBL!C WORKS sUBJECT: RESOLUTTON ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR BROADWA 1 190 TO 1454 BROADWAY, TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20lo2 7c TO: DATE: FROM BY REETSCAPE, NORTH SIDE CITY PROJECT NO. 9511 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting $874,305.11 in improvements for the North Broadway Streetscape project by J.J.R. Construction. BACKGROLII\D: On June 18, 2001, Council authorized a $849,244 contract with J.J.R. Construction for streetscape improvements along the north side of Broadway. All construction has been completed including repair work in the 1100 block. Additional expenditures amounting to $25,061 or 3% of the contract included: o Unforeseen utility repairso Modified catch basins to meet field conditions. Additional water line repair worko Incentive award for early completion The project has been completed satisfactorily and in a timely manner. EXHIBITS: Resolution; Final Quantities BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in Account No.320-95110 for this contract. All extra work was within the administrative 15% contingency authorization. Gomery c City Clerk J.J.R. Construction - Carlos Raposo Cambridge CM - JT Matarangas U:\FILES\Staff Reports and council presentations\NORTH Broadway Streetscape Final Acceptance.SR.wpd RESOLUTION NO. ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR BROADWAY STREETSCAPE NORTH SIDE 1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 9511 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION under the terms of its contract with the City dated JUNE 18, 2001, has been com- pleted in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 9511. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiry that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2N2, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\PROIECTS\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd City Clerk ,{, CONTRACTOR: JJR CONSTRUCTION .ADDRESS:1l2ONINTHAVENUE, SANMATEO. CA 94402 TELEPHONE ( 650 ) 3436109 BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - NORTH SIDE 1190.1454 BROADWAY CITY OF BURLINGAME FINAL PAYMENT ctTY PROJECT NO. 320-7 51 10-220 PAGE 1 OF 2 DATE: May2,2002 FINAL PAYMENT PURCHASE ORDER ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE UNIT SIZE BID QUANTITY BID TOTAL QTY THI9 PERIOD QTY TO DATE %AGE TO DATE AMOUNT TO DATE PREVIOUS PAID AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 1 $30,000.00 L.S,1 $30,000.00 0 1.00 10Oo/o $30.000.00 $30.000.00 $0.00 2 L.S.1 $8,000.00 0 1.00 100o/o $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 3 1 $20.000.00 0 '1.00 100%$20.000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 4 $27.000.00 0 1.00 1 00,s27.OOO.OO $27,000.00 $0.00 5 $5 000.00 1 $5.000.00 0 1.00 100 $5.000.00 $5.000.00 $0.00 6 i10.00 L.F 822 $8.220.00 0 822.OO 100o/o $8.220.00 $8.220.00 $0.00 '7 S. F.7,114 $35,570.00 0 7114.OO lOOo/o $35,570.00 $35.570.00 $0.00 I EACH 27 $2,700.00 0 27.OO 100o/o $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $0.00 9 i4.00 5.300 $21,200.00 0 5300.00 '1000/o $21,200.00 $21,200.00 $0.00 10 r.00 10 $6.000.00 0 10.00 100 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 11 500.00 t.s.$3.500.00 0 1.00 100 $3.500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 72 L.S.1 $7,700.00 0 1.00 1'aoa $7.700.00 $7.700.00 $0.00 13 $4 500.00 L.S.1 $4,500.00 0 1.00 100r $4.500.00 $4.500.00 $0.00 L4 L. S,1 $2,000.00 0 1.00 100o/o $2,000.00 $2.000.00 $0.00 15 200.00 EACH I $1,800.00 0 9.00 lOOo/o $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $0.o0 16 $4.i00.00 L-S.1 $4,500.00 0 1.00 100o/o $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $0.00 7',7 $2,t00.00 $42.000.00 o '15.00 100%$42,000.00 $42,000.00 $0.00 18 $1,500.00 EACH 3 $4.500.00 o 3.00 100 $4,500.00 s4.500.00 $0.00 19 L.F 325 $14,625.00 325.00 100%$14.625.00 $14.625.00 $0.00 20 L.F,8 $1,600.00 0 8.00 '100($'1.600.00 $ 1,600.00 $0.00 21 L. F,l9 $13,350.00 0 89.00 '100%$13,350.00 $13.350.@ $0.00 22 i55.00 L. F.48 $2,640.00 0 48.00 100%$2,e0.00 $2,640_00 $0.00 23 r.900.00 a $'r 1,700.00 0 2.OO 67%$7,800.00 $7,800.00 $0.00 24 $1,t )00.00 1 $41.000.00 0 50.00 1220/.$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 25 EACH 6 $4.200.00 0 4.00 67%$2.800.0o s2.800.00 $0.00 25 EACH $4,000.0i 0 4.00 lOOo/o $4.000.00 $4.000.00 s0.00 2'7 i35.00 L.F 862 $30,1 70.00 0 736.00 85($25.760.00 $25.760.00 $0.00 28 $30.00 L. F,132 $3,960.00 0 'r30.00 98or $3,900.00 $3.900.00 $0.00 29 EACH 16 $3,200.00 0 18.00 113%$3,600.00 $3.600.00 $0.00 30 i8.50 s. F. S,F. 457 0 764.00 $6,494.00 $74,400.75 $0.00 $0.00 32 i50.00 L,F 0 150.00 ---_____:::!: 6404 s7.500.00 $7,500.00 $0.00 33 i4.35 S.F $17.391 .3(0 3998.00 100o/o $17.391.30 $'17.391.30 $0.00 34 i2.50 S.F $1 0.665.00 0 6596.00 155%$16.490.00 $16,490.00 $0.00 35 s.F.4 $12,371.40 0 6596.00 1 55'$19,1 28.40 $19.128.40 $0.00 36 $150.00 c.Y.50 $7,s00.00 0 0.00 o%$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 37 EACH 15 $3,000.00 0 't5.00 100%$3,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 38 L, S.1 s3,500.00 o 1.00 10004 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 39 1.00 L. F.5.520 $5,s20.00 0 3174.OO 58%$3,174.00 $3,1 74.00 $0.00 40 ).00 1 $200.00 0 4.00 4000/"$800.00 $800.00 $0.00 SITE ELECTRICAL 0 s0.00 $0.00 $0.00 47 Site Electrical ;98,000.00 L.S.1 $98,000.00 0 1.00 lOOo/o $98.000.00 $98.000.00 $0.00 42 Planter Pots $1,000.00 EACH 14 $14,000.00 0 14.00 1O0o/o $14.000.00 $14.000.00 $0.00 43 Relocate Existino Trash Receotacles EACH 4 $1,000.00 0 6.00 1500h $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 44 Trash Receptacles - New i1.850.00 4 $7,400.00 0 4.OO 100o/o $7,400.00 $7.400.00 $0.00 45 Bikes Racks 5 $2.500.00 0 5.00 lOOo/o $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 46 Precast Concrete Seat Walls ;1 1,500.00 EACH ($69.000.00 0 6.00 10004 $69.000.00 $69,000.00 $0.00 florthBrdwypaymentschedule_s 51312002 4:59 PM rl l.r CONTRACTOR: JJR CONSTRUCTION ADDRESS: 1190 NINTHAVENUE, SAN MAIEO. CA 9,1402 TELEPHONE (650 )343$109 BROADWAY STREETSCAPE Ii'PROVEMENTS - NORTH SIDE 1190-'t454 BROADWAY CITY OF BURLINGAME FINAL PAYMENT crw PRoJECT NO. 320-7 s'.t 10-220 PAGE 2 OF 2 DATE: May2,2oo2 FINAL PAYMENT PURCHASE ORDER ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE UNIT srzE BID OUANTITY BID TOTAL QTY THIS PERIOD QUANTITY TO DATE % AGE AMOUNT TO DATE PREVIOUS PAID AMOUNT THIS PERIOO IIRRIGATION AND LANDSCAP 47 lnigation System $30,1 40.00 L.S.1 $30,1 40.00 0 1.00 1O0o/o $30.140.00 $30.1 40.00 $0.00 48 Backfill Placements (Final Pay ltem)$46.50 c.Y.210 $9,76s.00 0 104.00 50%s4.836.00 $4.836.00 $0.00 49 Trees, 36" Box $1,265.00 EACH 23 $29,095.00 0 23.00 1 00%$29,095.00 $29,095.00 $0.00 50 Shrubs, 5 Gallon $30.00 EACH 381 $11 ,430.00 0 381 O0 100%$1'1,430.00 $11,430.00 $0.00 51 Shrubs. 1 Gallon (Allowance)s10.50 EACH 1,262 $13,251 .00 0 1234.00 98Yo $12,957.00 $12,957.00 $0.00 52 Plants, 4" Pots $3.50 168 $588.00 0 0.00 0%$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Bark Mulch $0.5(S.F.1.061 $530.50 0 106t.00 lOOo/o 3530.50 $530.50 s0.00 54 Root Barner (Biobarrier)$13.50 L.F 446 $6.021.00 0 492.00 1 lOo/o s6.642.00 $6.642.00 s0.00 55 )lant Establishment Period $2,000.00 L.S.1 $2,000.00 0 1.00 100%s2.000.00 $2.000.00 $0.00 56 Metal Planting Banier $1 10.00 L.F 43 $4,730.00 0 39.00 91%s4.290.00 $,r.290.00 $0.00 57 Relocate Water Meters and Valves $250.00 EACH 14.00 $3,500.00 0 '15.00 107%$3.750.00 $3,750.00 $0.00 58 Relocate Sanitary Sewer Cleanouts $250.00 13.00 s3.250.00 0 5.00 38o/o $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $0.00 ITEM DESCRIPTION REPATR ITEM _ 11OO uNlr PRICE UNIT stzE BID QUANTITY BID rOTAL QTY THIS PERIOD QTY TO DATE %AGE rO DATE AMOUNT TO DATE PREVIOUS PAID AMOUNT rHIS PERIODA I lRemoveand replace concrete sideu,al i -1 1 51 Broadwav $20.00 S.F.12 s240.00 0 118/9867o/o $23,880.00 $23,680.0O $0.00 over 1" wide no $50,00 L.F.512 $25.600.00 0 0 o%$0.00 s0.oo $0.00 $10.s0 70 $735.00 0 173 247%s1.816.50 s1.816.50 $0.00 $33.00 EACH 2 $66.0(0 7 350%s231.00 $23'1.00 $0.00 $28.00 EACH 1 $28.00 0 5 300%$84.00 $84.00 $0.00 $350.00 EACH 3 $ t,050.00 0 6 2000h $2.'100.00 $2,100.00 $0.00 s275.00 L.S.1 $275,00 0 ,l 100%$275.00 $275.00 $0.00{ I lReplace Utility Box Lid with Fiberlvte lit $1.500.00 1 s1,500.00 o 0 Oo/o $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 00 CONTRACTORS CHANGE ORDERS I-T,IJ.*I $9,1 03.00 L.S.1 $9,1 03.00 0 1 '100.00%$9, '103.00 $9.1 03.00 $0.00 c.c.o.#2:$11,55't.66 L.S.1 $'11 ,551.66 0 1 100.00%$11,55'1.66 $'11,55'1.66 c.c.o. #3:L.S.$0.00 0.00%$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 i20.654.66 i0.00 TOTAL CONTRACT PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED crw t849,243.95 SUBTOTAL INCENTIVE (ADDITIVE) TEN PERCENT RETENTION SUBTOTAL WITH ADDITIONS 8i!3,650 . a5 8{3,650. {5 O. O0 W s/t/", st/s/a>;tr-7- $864,305.1 1 $10,000.00 $0.00 $864,305.1 1 $0.00 : ($86,430.51) : $777,474.60 $0.00 $10,000.00 | VP $874,305.1 I $86,430.51 $s6t3o5 I I I -----q99Jgq,!r-lTOTAL THIS PERIOD $874,305.1 1 _$711,877.60_ NorthBrdwypaymenbchedule_s 51312002 4:59 PM STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20to2 7d ro: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE; May7,2OO2 APPROVED FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDlNG SOUTH BROADWAY STREETSC IMPROVEMENTS, 1 190 fO 1454 BROADWAY, TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION and RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO BROADWAY STREETSCAPE BUDGET CITY PROJECT NO. 951 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the following resolutions for the Broadway Streetscape Improvements, along the south side from 1199 to 1445 Broadway:. resolution awarding a construction contract to J.J.R. Construction in the amount of $1,406,450.90 for all work including modified alley treatments.. resolution approving transfer of $147,000 from general fund reserve to Broadway Streetscape Improvements budget. BACKGROUND: In November, 2001 Council directed staff to proceed with the next phase of the Broadway streetscape improvements along the south side of Broadway, generally between Laguna Avenue and El Camino Real. The master plan construction extends from 1199 Broadway (the old Galleria de Farsh site) to 1445 Broadway (Bay View Bank) and will include three mid block alley treatments. DISCUSSION: Construction contract award to J.J.R. Construction On April 18, 2002, bids were opened for the Broadway Streetscape Improvements project. Two bids were received of $ 1,447 ,168 and $ 1,406,451 . J.J.R. Construction was the lowest responsible bidder. The bid price is about the same as the engineer's estimate of $1,432,045. The bid includes the mid block alley treatments for all three blocks. In an effort to reduce project expenditures, the Broadway Improvements District (BID) board members are requesting that the city install the add alternate alley treatments minus one of the two pedestrian arch signs nearest the public parking lot in the 1400 block of Broadway (see attached letter). This will reduce the project costs by $20,000, for a total of $1,386,450.90. This can be accomplished through a deduct change order after the project is awarded. J.J.R. Construction is the same contractor who installed the improvements on the north side of Broadway. They have met all the requirements for the project and have been engaged in the contracting business under the present name for more than nine years. Experience in work of a similar nature extends over a period of more than 20 years. In addition, J.J.R. Construction has installed streetscape improvements for Wells Fargo Bank at the corner of Broadway and Chula Vista Avenue; sidewalk improvements along Primrose Road and Burlingame Avenue as part of the reconstruction of Lot K-l and Lot J; and city sidewalk under the annual maintenance program. Transfer of funds approval The BID in the attached letter are offering to contribute $40,000 towards the construction of the alley treatments. Along with this contribution, an additional $147,000 will be required to fund construction of the alleys. This amount will be advanced from the General Fund Reserve and deducted from a future streetscape budget. Typically $500,000 is budgeted each year from the General Fund for streetscape improvements. With this advance, the fiscal year 2003-2004 streetscape budget will be reduced to $353,000. Staff has worked with the Broadway Improvement District members to review the future improvements for the south side. As discussed with the merchants, the city will be directing the contractor to expedite his construction schedule with the least disruption to the community. Examples of efforts include construction on Sundays and early mornings to avoid business hours and reduce traffic impacts; incentives for the contractor to complete the project early; bimonthly merchant meetings to discuss construction issues; and the use of a phone information line and web site to enhance communications. Construction for the south side improvements is expected to start in June, 2002 and be completed by winter, subject to weather conditions. BUDGET IMPACT: Funds are available in the streetscape, storm drainage and water budgets to perform the work. Following is a financial summary including the recommended actions previously discussed: Expenditures Construction with modified alleys Pedestrian arch sign change order deduction Consultant fees Construction conting ency (I7 %) Construction staff administration Total Funding Availabilitv FY 2001-02 CIP budget FY 2001-02 general fund reserve transfer FY 2002-03 CIP budget FY 2002-03 storm drain budget FY 2002-03 water main replacement BID contribution Total $1,406,451 $ (20,000) $ 170,000 $ 230,549 $ 70.000 $1,857,000 $ 350,000 $ 147,000 $1,000,000 $ 250,000 $ 70,000$ 40.000 $1,857,000 EXHIBITS: Resolutions, Appropriation Transfer Request, Bid Summary, and April 30,2002 BID letter to Mayor and Council c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Director of Finance, Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director, JJR Construction, and Cambridge CM U:\FILES\Staff Reports and council presentations\SOUTH Broadway Streetscape Contract Award JJR Con 5-20-02.SR.wpd WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT 9511 . BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS - 1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY NO. AWARDING SOUTH BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 1190 TO 1454 BROADWAY TO J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 9511 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: WHEREAS, on APRIL 18,2002, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION, submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of $1,406,451. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION for said project in the amount of $1,406,451, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED THERETOthatacontractbe entered into betweenthe successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2A02, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT s : \apublicworksdir\proj ects\resolutiomwild City Clerk CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROPRTATION TRANSFE&REQUEST DATE: May7,2002 Fund Reserve - DebitFiscal Year 01{2 Streetscape - CreditFiscal year 01-0247,000751 10 220320 TO: 1. REQUESTTRANSFER FUND DEPT 101 26115 DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM LISTED AMT $147,000 PROJ Justification (Attach Memo if Necessary) See Staff rbport from MaY 20,2002 HEAD DATE:BY: FINANCE DIRECTOR ACTION2. X COUNCILACTION REQUIRED Remarks: DATE:BY: Jim AS REVISEDAS REQUESTED CIry MANAG 3. Remarks: RESOLUTION_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2OO2.2OO3 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, that WHEREAS, the Department hereinabove named in the Request for Appropriation, Allotment or Transfer of Funds has requested the transfer of certain funds as described in said Request and WHEREAS, the Finance Director has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager has recommended the transfer of funds as set forth hereinabove: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DETERMINED thAt thE TECOMMENdAIiONS Of thE CitY MANAgCT bC approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected. MAYOR do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introducedl, ANN T.MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, at a regular meeting of the City Councilheld on the day following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS and was adopted thereafter by the CIryCLERK &Request.doc OBJT FROM: BID SUMMARY BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE 1 199 TO 1445 BROADWAY crw PRoJEcr # 951 1 I OF3 BID OPENING DATE: APRIL 18,2002 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED r#.1 BID#2 NO.QUANTITY UNIT CiW o Burlinoame R CON.GOLOEN BAY CON. UNIT PRICE TOTALS 1 Mobilization 1 L- S.s60_000.00 s60.000.00 $30.000.00 $30.000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 2 Traffic Control System 1 L. S.$20.000.00 $20.000.00 $30.000.00 $30,000.00 s35 000 00 s35.000.00 3 Pedeslrian Acess 1 ts s25 000 00 s25 000 00 s30 000.00 $30.o00.00 s27.000.00 $27.000.00 4 Coordinate with Utilities 1 L.S.s5.oo0.o0 $5.000.00 s10.o00.00 $10.000.00 $9.000.00 $9.000.00 5 Construction Staking 1 L.S.s15.000.00 $15.000.00 $40.000.00 940.000.00 935,000.00 $35,000.00 6 Remove Curb and Gutter 861 I F s't2 00 s10 332 00 slo.00 $8.610.00 s1 1.00 $9.471.00 7 Remove P.C.C.. Paving and Base 7 316,S. F-s5.50 MO.238_00 s13.40 s98.034.40 $12.00 $87.792.00 a Remove Parking Meter Posts 30 EACH $100.00 $3.000.00 $'100.00 $3.000.00 s50 00 s't 500.oo 9 Remove Asphalt Concrete Paving & Base 6.297 S. F.$4.00 s25 1A8 00 s4 00 s2s 188.00 s5.oo $31.485.00 t0 Remove Trees (Magnolias, 10" Dia..)11 EACH s1.oo0.oo s11.000.00 $1.O00.00 $1 1.000.00 $1.200.00 $13.200.00 11 Remove Soil - New Landscape Areas 1 L.S.$14.500.00 $14.500.00 $1 0.000.00 s10 000 00 s't3 000 00 s13.OO0.O0 12 Remove and Replace Failed Subbase (Allowance)25 CY s200 00 s5 000 00 $150.00 $3.750_00 s130.00 s3.250.00 't3 Remove News Racks to Parts Yard ,|L.S.s200.00 $200.00 s4.500.00 $4.500.00 $5.000.00 s5 000 00 14 Remove and Salvage Planter Pots 1 L. S.$2,000.00 s2,000.00 s3 500 00 s3 500 00 s3 700.00 $3.700.oo 15 Remove Sign Posts 1 EACH $1,000.00 s1.000.00 $2.800.00 $2.800.00 $3.000.00 $3,000.00 16 Remove Existing Striping & Pavement Markings 1 L.S.$5,000.00 $5,000.00 s4 000 00 M OOO OO s4 000 00 s4.000.00 CIVIL AND UTILITIES Potholing 20 EACH $600.00 s 12.000.00 $750.00 $15.000.00 s700 00 s14 000 00 18 Catch Basin C&GO 20 FACH $3,300.00 s66 000.o0 s3.500.oo s70.000.00 s3.300.00 $66.000.00 19 Plastic Pipe 173 L.F.$s0.00 $8.650.00 $60.00 $10.380.00 $60.00 slo 3ao oo 20 Area Drain 6 EACH $650.00 s3 900 00 s't 500 00 s9 000 00 s1.200.00 $7.200.00 21 Storm Drain Pipe - RCP 2l" diameter 435 LF $'r60.00 s6s.600.00 s95.O0 s41.325.00 $100.00 $43.500.00 22 Storm Drain Pipe - RCP lS" diameter 383 L.F.$135.00 $51,705.00 s65 00 s24 8C5 00 s65 00 s24.895.00 23 Stom Drain PiDe - RCP 12'diameter 12e I F,$1 10.00 s14.O80.00 $65.OO $8.320.00 $60.00 $7.680.00 21 Trena-hind 946 L.F.$50.00 $47.300.00 $90.00 $85,140.00 $85.00 sao 410 00 25 3 EACH $4,500.00 s13 500 00 s4 000 00 s1 2 000.00 s4.300.o0 s12.900.00 Storm Drain - Perforated Pipe 150 LF $50.00 s7.500.o0 $60.00 s9.000.00 $55.00 $8,250.00 27 Utiliv Boxes and Pan Lid Covers 20 EACH $2,0o0.00 $40.000.00 $1,000.00 s20 000 00 st 100 00 s22.OO0.OO Curb and Gutter 423 I F $33.00 s27 15S OO s35.00 s28.805_00 s40.00 $32.920.00 Vertical Gurt 't 39 L. F.$30.00 s4.170.00 $30.00 s4.1 70.00 $30.00 $4,170.00 30 Sidewalk Curb Drains 164 L.F.$20.00 $3.280.00 $30.00 s4 020 00 s50 00 s8.200.00 3t Through Curb Drain with Screen 6 FACH $100.00 s600 00 s200.00 $1_200.00 $300.00 $1.800.00 Full Depth AC (6' deep lifi with min. 2' overlay)1 2A2 S.F.$s.00 s21_410.00 $5.50 $23.55'1.00 $5.50 $23.s51.00 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete 5.910 S.F.$3.00 $17.730.00 $3.50 s20.685.00 s3 00 sl7 730 00 3/t Asphalt Overlay at Cold Plane Areas 5.910 S.F.$4.00 s23,640.00 s3 50 s20 685 00 s3.o0 $17.730.00 35 Traffc and Curb Striping (painted)2.963 I F $3.00 s8.889.00 $2.O0 s5.926.00 $2.50 s7.407.50 36 Pavement Markings (Painted)80 S.F.$10.00 $800.00 $5.00 $400.00 $5.00 $400.00 a7 Reloete Water Me-leB 11 EACH $500.00 $5.500.00 $550.00 s6 050 00 s600 00 $6.600.oo Relmte SanitaN Sewer Cleanouts o FACH $400.00 s3 600 00 $550.O0 $4.950.00 s600.o0 $5.400.00 39 Relffite Fire Hydrants EACH $8,000.00 $24.000.00 $4.500.00 $13.500.00 $4,200.00 sl2 600 00 10 New Water Valve in Street ,FA(:H $l,200.00 s2 400 00 s4 500.00 ss.o00.oo s5.000.00 $10.000.00 S:\A Public Works Directory\Prcjec't\951 1\9511 Bid Summary SOUTH 1 199 TO 1/145 Broadway, 2002 Bid Summary SOUTH Broadway 6BaOO2,2:32PM loeuourroru lstorm Drain Manhole BID SUMMARY BROAOWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE I199 TO 1445 BROADWAY CITY PROJECT # 9511 20F3 BID OPENING DATE: APRIL 18,2002 a ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED BID#1 #2 NO_QUANTITY UNIT City of Burlinqame JJ t coN-Con. UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS SITE CONSTRUCTION 11 Contrete Sidewalk 942 s. F.s9.00 s8.478.00 $8.50 $8.007.00 $9.00 $8 478 00 42 Concrete Paving (integral color)7.066 S.F.s12.00 $84.792.00 $10.7s $75,959.50 $11 00 s77.726.OO 43 Replace Concrele Under Fagade 200 L. F.$s0.00 $10.000.00 s50 00 s1o.000.00 s55.00 $11 .000.00 44 Parking Meter Post (with bases)'t6 EACH s200 00 s3.200.o0 s200.o0 $3.200.00 $175.00 $2.800.00 45 Posts and Signs 1 L. S.s5.000.00 s5.000.00 $5.500.00 $5,500.00 $5,000.00 s5 000.00 SITE ELECTRICAL 45 Removal of Existing Luminaries and Poles 6 FACH s2 500 00 $1 5 000 00 s900.00 s5.400,00 $1.000.00 $6.000.00 47 New Seruie Cabinet 1 L.S.s10.000.00 s10.000.00 $8.500.00 $8,500.00 s10 000 00 s10.o00.00 48 Pole and Luminaries Relocation 6 EACH $3,500.00 s21,000.00 s2 800 00 s16.800.00 $3.500.00 $2'1.000.00 49 Tree Light Po.rer Outlets 25 EACH s1.000.00 $25.000.o0 9750.o0 $1 8.750.00 $800.00 s20 000 00 50 Underground Conduits 1 L.S.s40.000.00 s40.000.00 $20,000.00 s20,000.00 s21 000.00 s21.000.00 51 Pull Boxes 7 FACH sroo oo s700 00 s750 00 $5.250.00 $700.00 $4.900.00 52 Conductors, Splices, and Terminators 1 L.S.$16.500.00 $16.500.00 $22.000.00 $22.000.00 s22 500 00 s22.500.00 53 Electrical System Testing and Commissioning 1 L.S.s1 0 000 00 slo ooo oo s4 400.00 s4.400_00 s4.500.00 s4.500.00 SITE ACCESSORIES il Planter Pots - 2 foot diameter 18 EACH $1.100.00 $19.800.00 sr ooo oo s1a ooo o0 s1. t 00.00 s19.800.00 55 Trash Receptacles - New 5 EACH s2.o00.00 s't0.000.00 s1.850.00 s9.250.O0 s1.700.00 s8 500 00 56 Relocate Existing Trash Receptacles 4 EACH s300.00 $1.200.00 $250.00 st ooo oo s250.00 s1.000.00 57 Relocate Eilsting Mail Box 1 FACH s500 00 $500 00 $1.000.00 $1.000.00 $900.00 $900.00 58 Relocate Existing Pay Phone 1 EACH $1.000.00 s1.000.00 $1.000.00 $1,000.00 sl ooo oo s1.o00.oo 59 Bikes Racks 5 EACH sl ooo oo s5 000 00 s500.oo s2.500.00 $600.00 $3.000.00 60 Precast Concrele Seat Walls 6 EACH s12.000_00 $72.000.00 $15.000.00 $90.000.00 $15,500.00 ss3 000 00 ai Metal Planting Barier 71 L.F,$ 1 35.00 $9,585.00 s250 00 s17 750 00 s250.00 $17.750.00 LANOSCAPING AND IRRIGATION 62 lnigation System 1 L.S.s45.000.00 $45.000.00 $40.o@.00 $40,000.00 s40 000 00 s40.oo0.00 63 Backfill Placements 98 c.Y..s70.00 s6 860 00 s50 00 s4.900.00 s45.00 s4.410.00 64 Trees,36'Box 23 EACH s1 300.00 $29.900.00 $575.00 $13.225.00 $550.00 s1 2 650 00 65 Trees,24'Box 2 EACH $750.00 s1.500.00 $310.00 $620.00 s300 00 $600.00 66 Shrubs,5 Gallon 222 EACH $30.00 s5 660 00 s30 00 s6.660_00 s31.00 $6.882.00 67 Shrubs, 1 Gallon (Allowance)524 EACH s15.00 s7.920.00 $20.00 $10.560.00 $20.00 sto 560 00 68 Plants, 4' Potrs 102 EACH $5.00 s51 0.00 $10.00 s1.020.00 s9 00 s918.00 69 Bark Mulch 998 S.F.$1.00 $998.00 sl 50 s1.497.O0 $1.60 $1.596.80 70 Root Barier (Biobanier)745 L. F.si4 rx)s10 430 00 $11 .OO s8_195.00 s10.00 $7.450.00 7'l Plant Establishment Period 1 L.S.s3.000.00 s3.000.00 $3.500.00 $3.500.00 $4.000.00 Srt OOO O0 Replace Existing Grasses with Day Lilies 66 EACH $30.00 $1.980.00 $30.00 s't s80 00 s33.00 $2.1 78.00 SUBTOTAL (item's 1-72)31.203.38/t.00 $1,199.707.90 11.233.220.30 S:\A Public Works Directory\Proiect\gs11\9511 Bid Summary SOUTH I 199 TO 1/+45 Broadway,2OO2 Bid Summary SOUTH Broadway 51312002,2:32PM Golder I #2ESTIMATEDITEM coN.Go en Bav Con.QUANTITY UNIT Citv of BurlinqameNO. TOTALS ADD ALTERNATE . ALLEY CONSTRUCTION s1 2 500 00 ss 000.00 $5.000.o0 s6.000.00 s6.000.00A1Mobilization,|L.S.$12,500.00 1 ts s4 000 00 S4.OOO.O0 $10.000.00 s10.000.00 $9.500.00 $9,500.00MConstruclion Staking s2 000 00 $2 500 00 s2.500.o01L.S.$2.000.00 s2.000.00 s2,000.00A3Coordinate with Utilities Demolition s5 941 00 s5.00 s6.310.00 M.50 $5.679.00A4Remove P.C.C. Paving and Base 1.262 S.F $5.50 441 SF s4 00 s1.764.00 s4.00 $1.764.00 $4.00 $1,7M.00A5Remove Asphalt Conclete Paving and Base s5 000 00 s4 500 00 $4.500.o01L.S.s2.500.00 $2.500.00 $5.000.00A6Remove Soil- New Landscape Areas s3 500 00 s3.500.o0 $4.000.00 $4.000.00A7Remove and Salvage Planter Pots and Benches 1 L.S.s1.000.00 $1,000.00 ts st ooo oo sl o00.o0 s2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.400.00 $2.400.00A8Remove Metal Bollards 1 Civil and Utilities s550 00 s8 800.00 s600.00 s9.600.0016EACH$500.00 $8.000.00A9Relocate Water Meters 1 F,ACH s4OO OO M00.00 $s50.00 $550.00 $500.00 $500.00A10Relocate Sanitary Sewer Cleanouts M 400 00 s4.400.001EACHs1.500.00 $1.500.@ $4.500.00 $4,500.00A1lRelocate Water Valve sl0 640 00 sl 50 00 s19.950.00 s150.00 $19.950.00A-12 Sanitary S€wer Line, 6 inch PVC 133 L.F.$80.00 s4 500 001EACHs5.500.o0 s5.500.00 s4.000.00 $4.000.00 $4.500.00A13Sanitary Sewer Manhole st ooo oo s6.000.o0 $1.100.00 $6.600.00allUtility Boxes and Pan Lid Covers 6 EACH $2.000.00 $12.000.00 s.t 120002ALFs45 00 s1.260.00 s50.00 $1.400.00 M0.00A15vertical Curt, 9'x 9" s13 30a 50 s10.50 s12.999.001.234 S.F.$12.00 $14.856.00 $10.75416Concrete Paving s50 00 s6 250 00 s50.00 $6.250.00 $55.00 $6.875.00A17Replace concrete Under Fagade (Allo$rance)125 L.F. s5 00 s740.o0148S.F-$5.00 $740.00 $5.50 $814.00418Full Depth Asphalt Conclete Site Accessories sr1 000 00 s42 000.002EACHs32.O00.00 s64.O00.00 $20.000.00 $40.000.00A19Pedestrian Arch s6 000 00 s6 m0.o0 s6.500.o0 $6.500.001EACH$'10.000.00 $10,000.00MOMetal Gate 17 FACH st 100 00 s1 8.700.00 $1.000.00 s'17.000.00 s1.050.00 $17.850.00421Planter Pots - 2 foot diameter s7 000 00 s1.200.00 s8_400.007EACH$2.200.00 $15.400.00 $1.000.00N2Planter Pots - 3 foot diameter s1 200 00 s4 AOO OO s2.500.00 $10.000.00 s2.500.00 $10,000.00423Benches4EACH Landscaping and lrrigation sl3 500 00 s13 500.00 s13.600_00 $13.600.00,|L.S.s15.000.00 $15,000.00I.24 lnigation System sl 700 005CYs70 00 $350.O0 s350.00 $1.750.00 $340.00A.25 Backfill Placement szl50 00 $900.o02EACHs500.00 $1.000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00A.26 Replant Existing ltalian Cypress s30 00 $6S0.00 s33.00 $759.00427Shrubs,5 Gallon 23 EACH $30.00 $690.00 139 FACH s15 00 s2.085.00 $20.00 $2.780.00 $20.00 $2,780.00A2AShrubs, 1 Gallon s3 ()4O OO s11 00 $3.344.OO304EACHs5.00 $1.520.00 s10.00A29Plants, 4'pots s1 50 s826.50 s1.50 $826.50a30Bart Mulch 551 S.F.$1.00 $551.00 IF s14 00 s714.00 $10.o0 $510.00 $1 1.00 $561.00A31Root Banier 51 s1.100.o0'l L.S.$1.O00.o0 $1.000.00 s1.000.00 s1,000.00 $1,100.00432Plant Establishment $206.743.00 s213,947.50SUBTOTAL ADD ALTERNATE (itEM'S A1-A31)$228,661.00 SUMMARY OF BID: 31.203.384.00 $1,199,707.90 91,233,22O.tOSUBTOTAL OF ITEMS 1.58 $213.947.503228,661.00 $206,743.00SUBTOTAL OF ITEMS A1-A31 $'l-432.0.15.00 $1.406.450.90 $1.447,167.80TOTAL CONTRACT BID SUMMARY BROADWAY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS . SOUTH SIDE 1I99 TO 1445 BROADWAY CITY PROJECT # 95.I1 30F3 BID OPENING DATE: APR|L lS,2002 a S:\A Public Works 5E|2OO2,2:32PM TO 1445 Broadway,2002 Bid Summary \_, -arr-zu BROADWAY BUSINESS TMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Apn|30,2002 1399 Broadway, Burlingame, CA 94010 Mayor Janney & City Council Burlingame City Hall 501 Pnmrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re; Broadway Allev Work Honorable Mayor & City Council EGEIVE PUBLIC CITY OF BURLINGAME lt/lAY - 3 2002 )!dc.P d+ B'I'D' asks that you consider moving forward yith the Broadway Alley beautification plan. Inorder to save $20,000, we recommend that on the 1400 block of'Broadway that the ped'estrianarch nearest the parking lot be eliminated and the arch near the sidewalk be maintained in thepran. D), Additionally,the Broadway merchants,B.I.D., are offering a $40,000 contributionthrough towards the alley project. Payments to be made as follows: $20,000 this year; $10,000 in 2003and $10,000 in 2004. This arrangement will allow B.LD. to continue its existing programs,including a contribution to the hotel shuttle, street gardening efforts and monetaryrncentives to induce owners and merchants to cleaning, repaint and repair their facades and awningsMoreover, B.I.D. offers S2,000 towards the replanting of day lilies where we now have the Bruce President B.I.D Board \ B David Hinckle, ve Armanino of Wry Board of Directors, Preston, Dr of .I.D. @ z. tr m E ffiE ! ! I E <^>lt ! gH m \f,ot-r !D o so Ol,s -rmCl ffi lrl G-{ a a o t-z &2 r!d -A l. t_t IJc UJoz. J ffivs d B, N a ll-= hr @ffi tsffi8 ffiEE =ffi Concemed Merchant Merchant EI.- D t--l. -- EE of Directors, B.I.D. STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 13,2002 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 5t20toz 7e TO: DATE: FROM: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROV!NG AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SE ES WITH NOLTE ASSOC]ATES FOR THE HYATT PUMP STATION RE-CONSTRUCTION - CITY PROJECT NO. 8704 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving an agreement wittr NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC.for design engineering services for the Hyatt Pump Station Reconstruction. The total amount of the contract is $83,872. BACKGROUND: In March 2002, a request for proposals was issued to five engineering firms for design engineering services. Staff interviewed two firms that responded and selected Nolte- Associites based on ttreir proposal, the interview, and discussion with previous clients. They have extensive experience in the design of pump station facilities. It is estimated ttrat the design phase will be completed within four months. In fall 2002, staff will return to Council for the award of a construction conffact as well as an agreement for construction phase professional services. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: The 200112C[l2 Capital Improvement Budget includes funding for these services. Philip B.P.E. Senior Civil pa c City Clerk, Nolte Associates Inc f : \apublicworks\staf f reportB\B?04. 6Ef STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 14,2002 PUBLIC WORKS AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 7f 5t20to2 TO: DATE: FROM: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY SUBJECT.TENTATIVE AND FTNAL PARCEL MAp FOR LOT COMBtNATI LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, 6, AND 17 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 4, TOWN OF BURLINGAME, 1310-1316 BAYSWATER AVENUE AND 121 PARK ROAD, PM O2-O2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council concur with the Planning Commission and approve this map. This action should be considered as approving both ttre Tentative and Final Map to facilitate processing. Following are the conditions: o { Final Map for a lot merger shall be filed by the applicant within the time period allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's subdivision ordinance. o The Final Map must be filed with the San Mateo County office before a building permit is issued. . All property corners shall be set and shown on the Final parcel Map. o The Final Map shall show the width of the right-of-way for Bayswater Avenue, Park Road and Primrose Road, including the centerline of the righrof-way, bearings and distance of the centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway. o All existing easements shall be retained. . All damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new. BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed that attached Staff Report and the Tentative and Final Parcel Map. The Planning Commission found that all requirements were met and recommended that Council approve the map with the above conditions. EXHIBITS: Tentative and Final Map, Staff Report T. Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Applicant S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\02-{2.STF.wpd RE MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ENGINEERING DATE: APRIL 30,2002 TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION, LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, 6, AND 17 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 4, TOWN OF BURLINGAME, 1310-1316 BAYSWATER AVENI]E AND I2I PARK ROAD, PMO2-02 This application is to combine four (a) existing lots into one (1) lot at 1310-1316 Bayswater Avenue and 121 Park Road. The applicant is proposing an on-site improvement which will require a lot combination in order to meet the zoning code. There zre no comments from the Building Department and Planning Department. The map application is complete and therefore may be recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for lot merger must be filed by the applicant within the time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Action on this map should be considered as both the tentative and final map to facilitate processing. 2. The final map must be filed with the San Mateo County office before a Building Permit can be issued. 3. All property corners shall be set and sho'.r.,rr on the final parcel map. 4. The final map shall show the width of the righrof-way for Bayswater Avenue, Park Road and Primrose Road, including the centerline right-of-way, bearing and distance of centerline and any existing momrments in the roadway. 5. All existing easements shall be retained. 6. All damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new. Exhibit: Tentative Parcel Map & Assessor's Map . Chang Senior Civil Engineer U :VICTOR\Projects\Private\PM02. 02.wpd Agenda ltem .2. Meeting Date 1n lo) $2,879,099.24 Ck. No.82191 - 82729 Excludes Library Cks. 82191 - 82237 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT 4"uC-> Payroll for April 2002 $1,590,438.07 Ck. No. 147835 - 148337 .EFTS for April 2002 $390,966.04 .ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding SDI (State Disability) PERS- Health Benefits Retirement STFINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS ( 05- 03- 2002 NAME THIS IS TO I IICLUSI VE. TIIE AMOU}IT OFFICIALS, ACCORDANCE RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CITY OT BURLINGATIE 11 ARRAIiT REGISTER FUND RECAP . 01.02 TUND 101 320 326 526 ,?7 528 518 619 620 621 625 731 896 n ,725 .82 107,609.75 4,086.00 6,419.93 207 ,542.60 3,157.91 PAGE 10 AI.{OUNT 357.17 7,411.50 1 ,464.23 1 ,569.54 836,08 140,916.41 990.93 s560 ,527 .87TOTAL FOR APPROVAL llot'IoRABLE t'lAYoR AND clTY COUNclt! CERTIFY THAT TIIE CLAII.{S TISTED ON PAGES NUI,IBERED FROI,I 1 THROUGH '10 A[o./oR ctAl]rs ]tutiBERED tROt4 82613 IHROUGIi 82729 IilCLUSM,TOTALING lN OF $560,527.87, }IAVE BEEN CHECKEO I}I DETAIL A}ID APPROVED BY THE PNOPER AI.ID III I.tY OPINIOII REPRESENT TAIR ANO JUST CIIARGES AGAINST THE CITY I}I !,ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREOII. FI}IANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYIIENT couitct L DATE DATE ( GENERAL FUiJD CAPTTAL II.IPROVEMENTS FUND !,ATER CAPIIAL PROJECT FUIID !,ATER FUND SEUER FUND SOLIO I,'ASTE FUND SELF INSURAIICE TU}IO FACILITIES SERVI CES TUND EOUIPI4EIIT SERVI CES TUND INFORI.IATIOI.J SERVICES FUI.ID FIRE I{ECHAiI I C SERVICES FUIID TRUST A}ID AGE}ICY TUND UTILITY REVOLVING FUND CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER 05/03t02 VENDOR DETAI L '*r Denotes Hand 9ritten Checks PAGE 9 A}IOUNT 3, 150.00 NUMBER NAI.IE 827?9 TOTAL GE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEiIS 23560 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S ACCO{JNT 3,1s0.00 326 79290 210 ((( $560,527.87 ( CITY OF BURLIIIGAMEIIARRAIIT REGISTER 05 /03/02 VENOOR OETAILr*t oenotes Hand Lhitten checks PAGE 8 A}4OUNT 600.00 500.00 400.00 1 ,316.00 80.00 150.00 150.00 825.00 3,157,91 812.50 6,278.5O 3,000.00 CAL STATE BUt LDERS BUSIIIESS LICENSE REFUIID 82719 AI4BER COT,|STRUCT IOI{ DEPOSIT REIUIIOS BAKER CO}IS]RUCTIO}I I.iISCELLANEOUS 82717 VA TONG ROOFIIIG I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS LENA },IUGHAXIIAM CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JAIIES GO}IEZ COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES CA}IBRIA ENVIRONMENTAT DEPOSIT REFUI,IDS iIC CALL ION CONSTRUCTIOil I,I I SCE L LAI/ EOUS CANT!/ELL ASSOC CAPITAL EOUIPI{ENT ACCdJNT 600.00 101 68010 220 1581 500.00 101 68010 220 1581 /100.00 101 68010 220 1581 '1,346.00 731 22546 206.75 '101 31510 80.00 101 30700 '150,00 731 22520 150.00 731 22520 825.00 7a1 22546 IIUI4BER I,IAI.IE 82713 82715 82716 82714 82720 82721 82722 42726 827?7 236t+4 23645 23646 23647 23648 23649 23650 ?3651 23652 23653 23654 23655 24656 23657 23658 FREEMAiI-DESI GNS iIISC. SUFPLIES MI SCELLAIIEOIIS 82723 scs E|{GTNEERS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 00 00 '101 68010 120 1323 731 22533 180 270 82725 ADVENT BUSIiIESS I.IACHINES EOUI P},IEIIT }.iAI NT, 3,157.91 528 66500 210 812.50 320 80302 220 /,5.00 '101 64150 200 6,278.50 101 68010 800 1101 3,000,00 731 22516 JAI.{ES FOHLER I,I I SCELLANEOT',S 82724 00EsT SoFTHARE SYSTEUS FINE APPARATUS I.IAIilT. 23659 249.00 625 65213 203 219 -OO 82714 CLARE EVAIIS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES (( 2.06.75 450.00 45.00 42724 DONALD STENBERG COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ( NUI{BER NAI.IE 82598 82700 42701 82705 82706 82708 8?709 8?710 CITY OF BURLIIICII4EIJARRAIIT REGISTER 05t03t02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hard lrritten Checks PACE 7 AI,IOUNT 500- 00 990.00 1 ,060.00 3,960.41 5,993.90 67, 5.65 10, t 30. 15 2a1.21 6.80 2,400.00 1,058.00 1,058.00 1,450-00 314,7? TARA PRATT CONIRACTUAL SERVICES 82699 MERIT RESOURCE GROUP TETIPORARY EI.IPLOY}IENT SVC. ACCCIJNT 990.00 101 64420 011 512.00 548.00 621 I ,751.10 2,206.31 101 58010 110'1100 101 68010 800 'l 100 5,993.90 3?0 75110 210 67,865.65 320 71171 220 'f 0,130.15 320 75110 210 23153 82702 NovA PARTT{ERS, I[C. PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 23236 82703 SAN CoNSTRUCT ION, INC, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ?3328 OFFICE DEPOI OFFI CE EXPENSE CAPITAL EOUIPI.IEI,/T 8?701 IIARRIS DESIGN PROfESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S PI TNEY EOI.IES COIITRACTUAL SERVICES CITY HALL I.IAI}ITENANCE IIOI'IE DEPOT I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SI.IALL TOOLS RECALL. TOTAL INFORMATIOI'I I.iGMT MI SCELLANEOUS 82707 MARK PACE EOUI PI.IE}IT MAtNT. 23040 23076 23128 23329 23384 23111 23157 23599 23622 0 220 200 00 64450 65 193.77 90.44 619 6t+160 120 5120 619 61160 130 JUL IE DAVIS TRAI II IIIG EXPENSE BRIAN GATES TRAIIIII/G EXPE}ISE KATI'ILEEN OORE PROPERTIES RENTS & LEASES 6.80 731 2251a 2,400.00 101 65150 200 1,058.00 101 65100 260 '1,058.00 101 65100 260 1,450.00 320 76010 180 314.72 619 64460 210 5120 82712 t.II CHELLE BRI STOL CONTRACIUAL SERVICES 23613 600.00 101 68010 220 1581 600.00 ( 500.00 101 68010 220 1581 ( 23600 82711 REFRIGERATIO},I SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 25639 PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S CITY OF EURLIIIGAI,IEt,JARRANT REGISTER 05 t03/02 VENDOR DETATL,*' Denotes HEnd Lrritten Checks PAGE 6 AI'IOUNT 1 ,238.83 40.00 2, 185 .60 20.15 500- 00 905.95 3,497.50 30.00 '170.00 520.00 700.00 714.34 402.62 300.00 82681 PROVIDENCE PEST TERTIITE PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ACCOUNT 40,00 619 64460 210 5150 2,185.60 101 68010 220 1584 20.15 896 202A1 500.00 101 68010 220 1581 905.95 101 65200 205 3,197.50 731 22546 30,00 620 15000 170,00 10't 68010 220 1461 520.00 896 202A1 700.00 10'l 680t0 220 1581 NUI,4BER I'IAi1E 82689 8?690 8269',I 82694 82695 82696 201 -20 859 - 9'l 177.72 101 61250 ',t10 101 65300 120 526 69020 110 82685 VB GOLF LLC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82686 AT&T UTILITY EXPENSE 8?647 DAVID I.'EDEKII.IG CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219(a 2213A 22262 22197 22514 22633 22842 22899 22924 23036 ?2672 42692 SA}I MATEO REGIONAL NET!/ORK, INC. 22759 UTILITY EXPENSE 82693 GROVE CO}ISTRUCTIOII I.I I SCELLANEd,lS EXPRESS TOIJING SUPPLIES ROBERTA TAVAKE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CARL DEOUANT CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES PEN INSULA UII I FORI{ & EOUIPIIENT UN I FORI.IS AIID EOUIP}IENT IISCELLA EC[rS I I'IAG I ST ICS OFFICE EXPENSE COiITRACTUAL SERVICES 357.17 357.17 101 65100 140 61a 64520 604 110.62 292.00 101 65100 110 101 65100 220 RAYMOIID FRAYNE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 58010 220 1581 8?697 NANCY OBED IN COI'IIRACTUAL SERVICES 23039 500.00 101 68010 220 1581 500.00 ((( 82683 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF TI,IE I,JEST, t 21819 OFFICE EXPENSE Il I SC. SUPPTIES OFFI CE EXPENSE 82688 RADIO ACCESSORY HEADOUARTERS RADIO I.IAINT. ?1947 ( I]UT,IBER IIA}4E 82670 82671 8?673 a2674 82675 82676 426-ta 82679 82680 82681 82642 CITY OF BURLINGA}IE!IARRANT REGISTER 05 t03/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks OAPPER TIRE CO., INC. SUPPLI ES 82672 oEi,rllts fiASKETT COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 82669 AT&T I.JIRELESS co,t u[ I cAT I 0N S C.H.8ULL CO}IPANY BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IA I IIT. LARRY ANDERSOII t.I I SCELLANEOUS CATHERINE J.M. NILT'IEYER I.I I SCE L LAN EOt,S H,V. CARTER CO., INC. BLDG. & GRq'NDS I.IAIIIT. EOUIPMENT I.IAI}IT. SPAR]AII TOOL LLC MISC, SUPPLIES UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. FIRE APPARATUS I.IAIIIT. ACCOUNT 595,98 101 65100 160 16.21 101 68020 190 2200 1,001.70 620 15000 500,00 101 68010 220 1581 a3.q 101 64350 031 500.00 731 22525 6,382.46 101 65400 800 1,545.00 101 68010 190 1101 317.1A 527 66.520 120 587.08 625 65213 203 400.00 101 68010 220 1581 2,801.00 10'1 37010 1,050.09 320 80120 200 DELL I{ARKETING L, P. CAPTTAL EAUIPI4ENT 8267 DUPONT TLOORING SYSTEI.IS 8LDG, & 6Rd.iNDS r'rAl[r. 20301 20159 20161 20654 20716 20801 20a76 20900 21075 2',1329 ?1543 21708 21767 21A11 AMOUNT 595.98 16.21 1 ,oot+.70 500.00 83.47 500,00 6,382,46 317.18 587.08 400.00 2,801.00 1,050.09 808 80SCH CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TURBo 0ATA SYSTEMS, I[C. I.I I SCELLANEOTJS I,IETI.JORK IEtECO.IPUT I NG EOUIPMENT t.IAI NT. (( PAGE 5 1 ,516.79 287 ,76 101 68020 190 2200 101 68020 200 2200 1 ,804.55 1,545.00 ( NUMBER NAiIE 82654 82663 82665 LYNNE FIRESTONE CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES CLEARLITE TROPHIES UI,I I FORI.IS ANO EOUIPi.IE}IT ( ACCOUNT 621.00 101 68010 220 1231 2,121.00 619 64460 210 5180 53,00 101 66100 2/.0 246.40 101 64420 210 758.36 101 68010 120 1450 9t3,00 101 68010 120 1323 518.93 101 65200 200 817.29 101 68020 140 2200 CITY OT BURL INGAI,IEIIARRANT REGISTER 05 /03t02 VENOOR DETAILr*r oenotes tlard lrritten Checks PAGE 4 AUOUNT 621.00 2,124 .OO 53.00 246.10 758.36 5',t8.93 417.29 2,830,00 1 ,485.00 5',t .00 3,755.00 5s3.75 520 -00 BAY ALARM PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 82656 AMERICAN !/ATER L'ORKS ASS}/. DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS 82657 PREFERRED AI.LIAIICE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 82658 r.rr LESToIE PR@UCTS Mtsc. SUPPLtES 82659 SIX FLAGS MARINE UORLD Il I SC. SUPPLIES 82655 826tr0 I,II}IOLTA BUSI I{ESS SYSTEI{S EoutP Ei,lT itAtilT. 42661 18716 18854 18951 19025 19028 19119 't9131 19679 19710 19791 19814 20060 20105 20246 CIUCCI COXSULTIIIG GROUP INC CO}ITRACIUAL SERVICES 82664 ART DOLLOSSO COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ALL FENCE Co PAi,tY, I[C. BLDG, & GROIJ}IDS MAINT. 8LDG. & GROUNDS iIAI}.IT. 415.00 415.00 526 69020 190 527 66520 190 66 67 67 101 66210 180 526 59020 180 527 &520 180 1,485.00 101 65300 220 5 1 . 00 101 6A010 220 1462 PEN IIISUTA CORRTDOR JOINT RE}.JTS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES RENTS & IEASES 25 25 EL CAIII I/O CNARTER LTNES IIIC I,I I SC. SUPPL!ES 82667 AttrlirTEL cc$fiIUNIcATIO S cot4tluNtcAT I0Ns 42666 82668 CENTRAL GANDEil CEI,ITER I.i I SC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 553.7s 101 68010 120 1323 20300 442.30 442.31 526 69020 1zo 527 6t520 120 884.61 ( 915.00 82662 520.00 621 61450 160 ( NUMBER NAME 82640 82641 82642 82643 82644 82645 82646 82618 SERVICE PRESS, INC. OFFICE EXPENSE 82650 82651 8?652 a2&9 co,rP usA EOUI PiIENT I.IAI XT. STANDARD REGISTER OITICE EXPENSE SPI NNAKER SAILING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I.I I LLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES MISCELLANEOI,IS ( ACCOUNT 't01 65200 110 101 65500 120 101 65200 140 101 65200 240 101 65200 250 101 65200 260 627.74 527 66520 120 21.63 526 69020 160 105.44 101 65300 120 1,601.15 101 65210 218 31.62 101 64350 120 1,645.80 101 65100 220 82,27 '101 66',100 110 L24.12 320 80420 200 596,16 101 64250 110 1,188.00 101 68010 2?0 1462 2,304.00 101 61120 031 CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IEL/ARRANT REGISTER 05t03t02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand t titten Checks PAGE 3 CHIEF 8I LL REILLY OFFICE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES UII I FORI.IS AND EOUIPMENI DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS TRAVEL & I4EETI}.IGS TRAI N I NG EXPE}ISE '1'1568 11640 1383/+ 14538 14371 15595 16555 16687 17495 17784 71 296 122 25 54 298 76 88 00 00 32 AI.IOUNT 627.71 21.63 105.44 62.22 '1,50't .13 31.62 1 ,645.80 82.27 428,12 596.16 'r , 188.00 2,304.00 !/ECO I NDUSTRIES, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES RADIO SHACK co4 uN I CAT I 0|t S IC80- IltT I L CoIIFERE CE 0F Il I SC. SUPPLIES AT&T UTILITY EXPE}.ISE DE!'EY PESI CONTROL RAT CO TROL PROGRAI,{ RITZ CAI'IERA I'{ I SC. SUPPLIES 82647 ALL CITY I'IAIIAGEI.IE II T COIITRAC]UAL SERVICES 14546 82653 TABOR READY, INC. TEI4PORARY EMPLOYI.IENT SVC. 18659 578.00 526 69020 011 678.00 62.22 A96 202A1 ( 868.37 11719 't3940 CI TY OF BURLIIIGAMEI.'ARRA}iT REGISTER 05 /03/02 VEIIDOR DETAIL.*r Denotes Hand uritten Checks PAGE 2 AI,iOUNT 388.56 880.00 724.a7 130, 159.07 39,087.00 2,100.00 11 ,393.52 129.90 58,34 936.00 2,928.O0 ,,283.74 378.00 810.00 82626 82627 82628 8?6?9 82631 82634 SAN I{ATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & I'IISCELLAIIEOUS 82530 ctTy 0t souTH sAll FRAllctsco OTHER AGEITCY CO}ITR IBUT IONS PACI FIC BELL UTILITY EXPENSE STEPHEII J. PI CCH I CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I,IARGARET PRENDERGAST COIITRACTUAL SERVICES SEOUOIA AIIALYTICAL LAES I.i I SCELLANEOUS LIEST GROUP PAY}IENT CTR. I.II SC. SUPPLIES RD OFFI CE SOLUTIONS MISC. SUPPLIES OTFICE EXPEI{SE LEONA MORIARTY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ACCOUIJT 388.56 896 20281 880.00 101 68010 220 1584 724.87 101 6a010 220 1341 130,159.07 751 22587 39,087.00 527 66s30 270 2,100.00 526 69020 233 11,393.52 320 76350 ??0 82632 TII.IBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC, CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES 82633 03'168 o3179 03131 03483 03760 0396/r 09213 09270 09461 09881 09979 14.64 39 .70 526 69020 120 527 66520 110 82635 TESTII.IO ENGI NEERS, IXC. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 82639 82637 CALLANOER ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 82638 CRAIG !/. REED COIIIRACTUAL SERVICES 936.00 326 A0320 220 2,928.00 101 65100 291 5,283.74 320 71171 210 378.00 101 68010 220 1587 840.00 101 68010 220 1344 ((( I]UiIBER NAI,iE 03080 03536 1?9.90 101 64350 120 82636 sAlr tlATEO CoUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 PRISONER EXPENSE CITY OT SURL INGAI,IEI,JARRAI.iT REGISTER 05 /03/02 VEI.IDOR DETAILr*r oenotes HErd tllitten Checks ACC(UI.JT PAGE 1 AI,4OUNT 5,899. 14 121 .7A 8,946.27 2,301 .67 603.00 2,263.82 164,402.OO I ,339.63 500.00 261 .62 129.53 153.50 NUMBER NAI,4E 42613 82611 82615 BAUER CO{PNESSORS FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI [T. ACTIO}I CLEANING SERVICE EOUIPI.IEiIT I.IAINT. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES BLDG. & GROUNDS IIAINT. l0l 65400 200 619 64460 220 5110 621 64450 190 101 68010 114 1100 101 68010120 1323 731 22543 01030 01309 01624 01637 021 ',t 0 02244 02?61 02360 02410 o2n5 02819 349.03 5 ,018.57 501.51 1,800.00 6,134.23 1,012.O4 121.78 101 65200 203 CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE I.I I SCELLAilEqJS I.i I SC. SUPPLIES T.IISCELLANEOUS BURLIIIGAME CHAI,IBER OF COI,4I.{ERCE CIAHBER OF CO,4HERCE PttT. 82617 BURLIIIGAXE RECREATION DEPT. RECREAIIOX EXPEiISES US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES COTTRACTUAL SERVICES 01663 82618 DULIN ADVERTISING INC, PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 02036 82619 2,301.67 101 64550 ',t51 603.00 101 10700 2,263.82 101 64120 150 161,102.00 527 66530 220 255.43 526 69020 260 82620 L'.9. GRAINGER, INC. TRAI},IING EXPEIISE 82621 82622 8?623 82624 LAlisoN PRo0ucTs, IIc. SUPPLI ES GRAIIITE ROCK COI1PAIIY SIOEI]ALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE CIIARLES J. HAPP CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HASELEACH SURVEYI I,IG I IISTRUiIENT I.IISC. SUPPLIESi sc. suPPLlEs 500.00 101 68010 220 '1581 239 100 101 66210 219 101 66210 226 202.08 59.51 320 40270 120 526 59020 120 34 29 429,53 520 15000 153.60 101 65300 011 ((( 255.13 82625 MANPO!'ER TEI.IPORARY EMPLOYI.IENT SVC. 04-26-2002 NAME GENERAL FUND CAPITAL II'{PR0VE}'IENTS FUND I.JATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND I.IATER FUND SE!'ER FUNO GOLT CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUIPIITENT SERVICES FUND INIORMATION SERVICES FUND FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AND AGENCY FUND BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM UTILITY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL FOR APPROVAL CITY OF BURLINGAMELIARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP - 01-02 ((( 132.66 502.10 PAGE 9 AMOUNT 044.74 192.64 793.13 28, 118, 75, 5, 2, 13, 13, ?, l+, 1, 14, 49, FUND 101 320 326 5?6 5?7 529 518 619 620 521 525 731 736 896 469.03 225.84 707.86 649.56 304-70 855 .56 071.31 32-44 423.18 9330,404.75 (Z*z oo> "c:f HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROI,JGH 9 AND/oR CLAIMS NUMBERED FRor't 82503 THRoucH 82612 INCLUSM,TOTALING IN 0F $330,404.75, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED By THE pROpER AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN I.,ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT COUNCI L DATE 6":-t 6 t THIS IS TO I NCLUS I VE , THE AI{OUNT OFFICIALS, ACCORDANCE 23638 82509 REFRIGERATIOII SUPPLIES DISTRIBU] 23659 I.I I SC. SUPPLIES JEAN HORIOI,I MI SCELLANEOUS BKF ENGIIIEERS PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S IED O}JYANG TRA!NING EXPEI.JSE ( ACCOUNT 325.00 731 22543 200.00 731 22513 504.22 731 22543 131.92 619 64460 120 5220 549,75 101 64420 262 6,419.40 3?O 79420 210 604.72 '101 65300 260 CITY OF BURLIIIGAI,4E!/ARRAI,IT REGISTER 04/26/02 VENOOR DETAI L '*' Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks PAGE 8 Al,l0UNT 325.00 200.00 131 .92 549.75 6,119.40 604.72 s330,404.75 BAY AREA PARENT (STPEN/NO.BAY) 23636 I.I I SCELLANEOUS 82507 I,IARIA PADILLA }IISCELLANEOT]S NUII1BER NAME 82606 82608 8261 '1 8261? TOTAL 23637 23610 23641 23642 (( 504.22 82610 LA SALSA TRAINI}iG EXPENSE VE}'/DOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand gritten Checks 345.00 500.00 101 36600 731 22525 A}'IOUNT 12,361,44 4,230.00 550.00 154.00 84.00 960.00 51.75 2,000.00 845.00 2,150.00 413.60 46.32 145.00 800.00 764.12 NUI.4BER NAME 82590 8?591 82592 42593 82591 82595 82596 82598 82599 82600 82601 82603 LONE STAR LANDSCAPE CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES CULVER GROUP PROTESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S ICE CE}ITER OF SAN I4ATEO CO}iTRACTUAL SERVICES COREY SII.ION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JEF F SCHI.]ARTZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CHARLES SCI1EI{BRI DEPOSIT REFUNDS PETERSO}I SUPPLIES ACCOUNT 12,361.11 520 80140 220 4,230.00 320 80570 210 560.00 101 68010 220 1152 154.00 101 68010 220 1587 84.00 101 68010 220 1587 960.00 731 22520 54.75 3?0 75170 130 2,000.00 731 22520 GERALD TAYLOR SiIALL TOOLS 42597 ERNEST ROGERS JR. DEPOSIT REFUNDS BIU},JK DEXATTE I ASSOCIATION r.t I scEttA Eurs }II SCELLA}IEOUS JOHN JONES DEPOSIT REFUNDS RO8 IIALLICK PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S PA BLool.t iIISCELLAI{EOUS 82602 SHRM DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS 23375 23448 23512 23609 23610 23621 23626 23627 2362A 23629 23630 23631 23632 23633 23634 2,'150.00 731 22520 11r.60 619 64460 210 46.32 526 22502 800.00 520 15000 764.12 731 225A5 82605 INPRO CORPORAT ION PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIzED S 23635 990.58 619 64460 210 5120 990.58 ( A2604 STYLERS I ScELLA EOUS ( CI TY OF EURLITIGAME !/A R R A N T R E G I S T E R 04/26/02 ( PAGE 7 115.00 101 61120 ?40 ( NUMEER NAI.iE 82575 82576 82580 82583 82588 825n vALt C@PER Al,tD ASSoCIATES, INC. 22813 PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S HELUIG COIISTRUCTION I.IISCELLANEOUS 82577 EXPRESS TO!'ING SI,'PPL IES 82578 ABSOLUTE CELLULAR CO4IIUN I CAT I ON S JONES AND I.IAYER PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL1ZED S }IARSIEN STREET PARTNERS RENTS & LEASES ROPERS, MAJESX I , KOHN & BEiITLEY PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S DIRECTV COMMUNICAT IOIJS ERIC SYI{ANSKI COIITRACTUAL SERVICES SAN TRAIICISCO EXAI.I I NER illsc. suPPLlEs ( ACCoUItT 65.16 101 65200 130 1,650.00 n1 22516 40.00 620 15000 20.57 101 68020 '160 2200 165.00 320 76110 210 154.27 101 6/1350 210 414.80 lot 65200 201 25,000.00 320 76010 180 12,005.84 618 61520 210 1,012.00 101 64420 orl 190-00 526 69020 190 7 ,570.00 320 W(OO 210 48.98 526 69020 160 328.25 320 79160 120 CITY OT BURLINGAiIE [/ARRANT REGISTER 04t26/02 VENDOR DETAILf' Denotes Hand tlritten Checks PAGE 6 AI.{OUNT 65.16 84.00 1 .650.00 40.00 165.00 151.27 414.A0 25,000.00 '12,005.44 1,O12.00 190.00 7,57O.00 48.98 324 -25 22360 22429 ?2501 22633 22A12 22814 22857 22895 23366 82581 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE D I STRI BUTORS GAS, OIL & GREASE 82582 23019 82584 I.IER I T RESOURCE GROUP TEIIPORARY EI.IPLOYMENT SVC. 23076 82585 THE I.IOB I LE STORAGE GROUP BLOG. & GROUI]OS MAINT. 23138 82586 CYSERNET COIISULTING, Illc. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 23234 82587 23253 82589 THE PRACTICAL SOLUT IOI,IS GROUP MISCELLA EqJS 750.00 618 61520 038 750.00 ( 82574 NOR]HERN TOOL AND EOUIPI.IEi]T SMALL TOOLS 84.00 101 68010 220 1587 20,57 23367 ( NUI.IBER IIAI.IE 82565 82570 CITY OT BURL I iIGAI.,IE9ARRANT REGISTER 04/26t02 VENDOR DETAIL '*r Denotes liand Hritten Checks 70,719.71 2,9A0.44 326 79530 210 5?6 69020 210 PAGE 5 AI.4OUNT 2,315.86 73,700.18 600.00 4,500.00 1n .07 536.54 1 ,001 .52 1?,656.50 12,158.35 57.09 364.57 38.75 ACCOJNT 2,315. a96 20281 82559 SPRINT PCS UTILITY EXPENSE 82560 ROT'IAN & LOUGEE, INC. PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 82561 REIIEE RAI{SEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82562 }IICOLAS EECHgAII OEPOSIT REFU},IDS PORTOSAII RENIS & LEASES 20724 20963 21656 21948 2213a 21717 82566 I,'ILBUR SI.IITH ASSOCIATES PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S 21769 82167 BIEB AND ASSOCIATES, rNC. PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALIZED S 21 3 CINGULAR I,JIRELESS COI,{I4UN I CAT IONS 82568 V8 colt LLc I.I I SCELLANEOUS RECREATIOII PROGRAI.I EXPENSE 82569 AT&T UIITITY EXPENSE 21253 82563 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. FIRE APPARATUS i{AIiIT. 21513 82564 600.00 101 68010 220 1231 4,500.00 731 22520 711.05 625 6521s 203 175.07 t29 68030 180 4200 536,54 101 66100 160 1,001.52 320 80480 210 12,656.50 320 80510 2,10 10,691 ,47 1 ,766.88 529 36716 529 68030 ?13 57.09 896 20281 270.00 101 68010 220 1/,60 361,37 320 71170 110 38.75 101 65200 202 22191 82571 cuMt4rlts-ALLrsoN coRpoRATloll OFFICE EXPENSE ?2191 ALLAN RIDLEY COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES 82572 AUTO PRIDE CAR I.'ASH VElTCLE I,IAIIIT. 22278 82573 AllERICAlr EUSr XESS CO,itiUN I CAT r ONS 22339 PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING 2,091.40 101 68010 150 1450 2,O91.40 (( 711.05 270.00 CITY OF BIJRLINGAI"IE}IARRAIiT REGISTER 04t26/02 VENDOR DETAIL '*r Dehotes Hahd Uritten checks ( ACCOUNT 145.85 320 75110 120 288.00 ',t01 68010 220 13/,7 1 ,194.74 620 15000 450,00 731 22520 18,24 526 69020 171 PAGE 4 42546 ANG }.IEI.ISPAPERS PUBLICATIONS & AOVERIISING PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S 't09.62 6r.52 101 64200 150 520 80510 210 NUTIBER NAI.{E a2544 82545 82547 42544 82519 82550 82551 82552 82553 82554 82555 82556 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES JUDY ROSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PR IOR I TY 1 SUPPLIES JAflES CACCIA PLUI4BING DEPOSIT REFU}IDS BLACK MOUI/TAIX SPRITIG gATER I,IATER PUNCIASES BURTON IS TIRE APPARATUS IIRE APPARATUS MAIIIT. TIRE APPARATUS MAINT. EAKERIS CHEI.I.DRY PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIALIZED S ERIC GIESEKER CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES BAY AREA BUSTIIESS CARDS INC OFFICE EXPENSE AFFI N I TEL Co0'll.'lul/ I cAT IoNS CO,I}IUN I CAT T ON S 82557 AT&T !/IRELESS COI,4MUN I CAT IONS Colt1l'luN I CAT I 0|i S 19047 19067 '19083 19239 19320 19330 19366 19431 19191 19544 20105 20246 20301 AIIIOUNT 288.00 175.14 I ,194.78 450.00 168.21 395.00 158.00 266.83 215.00 2,624,06 120.00 629.81 AMERICAII SOCIETY OT CIVIL ENGII,IE 19821 OUES & SUESCRIPTIOTS EL CAI,II }IO CHARTER LI}IES INC UISC. SUPPLIES 50.65 144.51 101 65200 203 625 65213 203 597 .47 32.14 lot 55200 160 736 64571 160 168.00 101 68010 220 't587 266.83 't01 65200 110 '120.00 621 64450 160 82558 CARTER INDUSTR IES INC. SUPPLIES 20673 336.51 620 15000 336.51 (( 116.83 '195.'17 395.00 619 64450 2',t0 5180 215.00 101 66100 240 2,624.06 101 68010 120 1322 CITY OT BURLINGAI.IEUARRANT REGISTER 01t?6/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes HaM f.itten Checks NUMBER IIAI,4E 82529 DARYL D. JONES, IIIC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82530 ACCOUIIT 225.00 101 65200 220 923.32 526 69020 210 1 ,173,01 621 64450 110 345.00 101 68010 220 1162 179.50 101 65200 203 I.IVP REPAIR SERVICE CO. PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAT IZEO S DAI/KA OFFICE I}IAGING CO OTFICE EXPEXSE 8?532 MARK CER}IY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1010'l '11739 13758 14405 15078 15815 16066 16347 17497 17959 AMOUNT 225.O0 9?3.3? 1,173.01 179.50 862.16 84.00 353,27 52,469.39 1,210.?4 678.00 1,488.38 82531 82533 82531 82540 8?535 JOSEPH L'I tL IAiI }ICCLAIN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62536 SYDNEY I.IALKOO STIALL IOOLS 82537 UI CtpAL ATT,|TE ANCE SUPPLIES 82538 COLORPRINT DIGITAL SMATL T@LS 82539 BURLINGTON SAFETY LABORATORY FIRE APPARATUS MAIIIT. BRII{KI S INC. BANKING SERVICE FEES OFFICE EXPENSE SHAS PI PELINE INC CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PEIIINSULA PUI{P & PU}IP EOUI PI4EHT REPAIR 135.75 426.11 101 &250 120 529 68030 't10 4200 81.00 10't 58010 220 1587 56.21 620 66700 130 353,27 620 15000 274.41 526 69020 130 18,144,39 4,325.00 320 n380 220 326 Ac320 220 18450 82541 LA80R READY, rNc, TEI,IPORARY E|{PLOYI.IENT SVC. 18659 82512 NATURCLEAN XISC. SUPPLIES 18830 1,210.21 527 66520 230 678.00 526 69020 011 1,488.38 527 66520 120 82543 ACCESS UNIFOR}.IS & EI,{EROIDERY UNI FORMS A',ID EOU T P'.,IE},IT 18990 2,478.37 101 64420 140 ?,478.37 ((( PAGE 3 345.00 56.?4 274.41 16629 CITY OF BURL INCAMEI.'ARRAIIT REGISTER 01/26/02 ( ACCoUIIT 641.50 101 68010 220 1342 PA6E 2 82518 DOROTHY RADYK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NUMBER },IAI.iE 82519 82520 82521 8?522 42523 82521 82525 03235 03571 o3764 03961 09072 09125 095 r8 09975 3&.63 -27 .06 142.25 37 .99 1n.69 u.28 67.97 64150 80450 69020 69020 59020 66520 66700 64150 AI.IOUN T 643.50 793,U 109.20 4,626. 127.74 40.38 360.00 470.00 160.00 SKYLINE SUPPLY CO., INC. OFFICE EXPEIISE CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES OFFICE EXPENSE TRAI}ItIIG EXPENSE I.I I SCETLAXEOTJS EXPENSE OFFICE EXPEI,ISE OFFICE EXPEI,ISE OFFICE EXPENSE Toi.tARK SPoRTS, INC. EOUI P}IE}IT I.iAI IIT. [/EST GROUP PAYI.IEI,I] CTR. PROFESSIOITAL & SPECIALIZED S B.E.I . ELECTRI CAL SUPPLIES FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. I4UT'IE CALEREATIi CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES 109.20 529 68030 200 4500 EURLII.IGATIE REC, DEPT./PEITY CASH OFFI CE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES 8LDG. & GROJ}IDS MAINT, PROIESSIONAL & SPECTALIZED S COIITRACTUAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPT IOIIS lrIsc. supPLlEs }IISCELLANEruS 03910 ALLSTAR TIRE EOUIPMENT, INC. I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 01938 2.37 11.69 20 8?6 533 1a1 759 215 20 l8 38 00 00 00 99 101 320 s26 526 526 527 620 621 101 10'l 101 't0'l 101 101 320 731 68010 68010 68010 64420 68010 58010 80190 22534 110 220 110 260 290 110 110 t t0 110 120 190 210 220 210 '120 1100 1100 1100 1344 1100 255,04 101 61350 210 10,t8 101 65200 203 350.00 101 68010 220 1460 470,00 618 61520 601 160.00 101 68010 220 1342 82528 LEONA I.IORIARTY CONTRACTUAL SENVICES 09979 1,680.00 101 6a010 220 1341 I ,680.00 ( VE}IDOR OETAILr*r Denotes tlahd lrritten Checks ( 82526 AEAG . LIABILITY CLAIiIS PAYI'IENTS 82527 AXA FI TZGERALD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 255.04 127.71 101 65200 111 CITY OF BURLI}IGAI.IEIJARRAN] REGI STER 04/?6t02 VEI,IOOR DETAILr*r oenotes Hahd L/ritten Checks ?07 229 101 65400 200 619 64460 220 5110 ( accoulT 525.00 5?6 69020 260 266.50 101 64350 120 80,00 101 32100 669.35 10'r 10700 1,793. 620 15000 308,80 101 64120 150 123.94 101 68020 192 2200 1,375.05 896 202A2 2,041,46 101 f6210 226 547.76 619 61460 120 5120 165,00 101 68020 t20 2300 72.53 620 15000 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 525.00 436.00 266.50 80.00 669 .35 1 ,793.86 308.80 123.94 4 ,375 .05 2,041 .46 547 .76 165.00 72,53 40,678.27 82505 }.IAIIHEII EENDER & COI,IPANY, INC. I.i I SC. SUPPLIES 82506 AI,iTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES EOUI PI,4EIIT IIAI },IT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES C ITY OF BURLINGA}IE I'I I SCELLAiIEOUS 82507 BURL I NGAME RECREATION DEPT. RECREAT IO},I EXPENSES 82508 GCS L/ESTERT POLIER & SUPPLIES 82509 DULIN ADVERTISTNG INC. PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING 82503 * GORDON GOTTSCHE TRAINIIIG EXPEIISE EL'ING IRRIGATION PROOUCIS I.I I SCE!LAXEOUS !,ATER/TI NAIICE PETTY CASH iII SCELLA}IEOIJS GRANITE ROCK COIPANY STREET RESURFACI NG EXPEI.ISE K & II OISC(UNT LIGHTING & SUPP [lsc. suPPLlEs NATIONIIIDE IIIRE & BRUSH I.IFG. SUPPLIES }IUMBER I.IAI,4E 82504 825',t 0 42511 82512 82513 23625 01078 01312 01551 01663 01857 02036 02157 02184 0??61 02645 02872 03002 03054 00 00 82514 MAYI.IE TREE EXPERT CO., IIJC. ilISC. SUPPLIES 82515 10.23 40,668.04 527 c6520 170 896 20280 82517 PACI F IC BELL UT I LITY EXPEIISE 03080 2,007.'14 896 20281 2 ,007 .11 (( 82516 P. c. & E. GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY EXPEIISE 04-19-2002 NAME GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND I.JATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND SEIJER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND LIATER FUND SELIER FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUIPMENT SERVICES FUND INFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AND AGE}ICY FUND BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM UTILITY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL FOR APPROVAL CITY OF BURLINGAMELIARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP . 01-02 FUND 101 320 326 327 5?6 527 529 518 619 620 621 625 731 736 896 PAGE 11 AMOUNT 141,400.82 1 ,334,?45.67 1 ,413.11 1,4',t3.12 59,930.50 3,300.32 58.61 8,991 .14 10,914.66 1,358.51 2?,795.27 81.25 45 ,000.76 15,716.94 410.29 $1 ,646,910 .97 1 ^)5.ooSuo.oo W)to VO ID 8 >so 8)* 5Q-l<- oK-7b b tsS.)7 HONORABLE I'|AYOR AllD CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11IilcLUSM, AllD./oR CLAIMS NUI|BERED FRO,| 82361 THROUGH 92502 INCLUSM,TOTALING INTHE AMOIJNT OF 51,616,940.97, HAVE BEEN CHECKED I}I DETAIL A}ID APPROVED BY THE PROPEROFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDA}ICE I.'ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI,IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBtt{I TTED. DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT COUNC I L DATE (( FINANCE DIRECTOR ( NIJI,{BER NAI.IE 8?492 82193 82494 82195 8249A 82499 82501 82502 IOTAL CITY OF BURLINGAME I"A R R A N T R E G I S T E R 04t 19 /02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 360.00 731 22541 256.29 526 69020 120 PAGE 1O AMOUNT 360.00 256 -29 2,826.23 100.00 125.00 1,269.10 440.00 1 ,450.00 200.00 315.29 t25.00 $1 ,616,910.97 CATHOLIC SAN FRANCISCO I'I I SCELLAIIEOUS THE KUPFERLE FOUNDRY CO. I'IISC. SUPPLIES BARTLE UELLS ASSOCIATES PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S SRIAN GO{ES CONIRACTUAI SERVICES 8?496 EO TICKEL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82497 BURLINGAI1E HIGH SC}IOOL CO}IIRACIUAL SERVICES ,113.11 ,113.12 326 79530 210 327 78535 210 23614 23615 23616 23617 23618 23619 23620 23622 23623 23621 23625 INN AT IiIORRO BAY TRAVEI & MEETINGS KATHLEEN DORE PROPERTIES RENTS & LEASES 82500 KAI}IY SYilAISKI I.I I SCELLANECT,'S 100.00 101 68010 220 1581 125.00 101 68010 220 1581 1,269.10 101 6a010 220 1572 440.00 101 55300 250 1,450.00 320 76010 180 200.00 731 22543 315.29 101 64400 250 525.00 526 69020 260 RUB I II HURIN TRAVEL & I4EETIIIGS GOROON GOTTSC'IE TRAINING EXPENSE ( T Iil RI CHI'IOND TRAVEL 8I.IEETINGS t.IICHAEL S]ERII COIITRACTUAL SERVICES TLC ADI,IIN I STRATORS PROFESSIO}IAI. & SPECIALIZED S 8218?XAVIER UEBB CONIRACTUAL SERVICES 82483 scAPES, I iic. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82481 TON.I HATLENDORF I,IISCELLA}IEOUS 824A6 cJ's oELI iIISC. SUPPLIES 82487 KORALEEII ENTERPRISES MISCELLA}IEOUS 82488 CHRIS ROGERS OFFI CE EXPENSE VE},{DOR DETAIL '*r Denotes tiend gritten Checks 2291a ( ACCOU|,tT 70.18 101 68020 250 21oO 667.70 101 64420 121 1,936.00 101 644?0 011 112,00 tot 68010 220 1588 175.00 101 61420 210 75.00 101 68010 220 ,t581 11,875.00 320 80190 220 200.00 101 36500 1,573.15 621 61450 2oO 455.00 101 65200 120 1,244. 526 690?0 233 5',r 9.59 101 64420 110 9,302,52 526 69020 210 619,'14 618 615?0 210 82477 cPs PERSO}IIIEL EXAiII IIAT IONS 82178 I,4ER I T RESOIJRCE GROUP TEI,IPORARY EI.4PIOYiIENT SVC. 82479 CRITICAL SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALTZEO S 82480 CITY OF BUR! INGAI,iEI'ARRANT REGISTER 04/19 /02 PAGE 9 AMOUIIT 667.70 1 ,936.00 24,187.71 112.00 175.00 75.00 11,875.00 200.00 1,241.A6 519 -59 9 ,302.52 649.11 82176 23418 82485 CANOII FINANCIAL SERVICES, IIIC. CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 23136 23076 23086 23097 23156 23160 23326 23502 23510 23517 82189 ERLER AIIO KALI OT]SKI,IIIC. PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAI I ZED S 23531 82190 I'IADELE INE FREDA, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIATIZED S 2353? ( 82491 TIIKE KORDI,IER TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS ?3613 171.00 101 68010 250 .l,loo 171 .00 ( NUI.IBER i]AtIE 23005 70. 18 1 ,573.15 455.00 21,1A7.71 320 76010 210 ( NU}.IBER IIAME 42461 82462 82463 82161 82165 82166 8?46A 82169 82170 8?171 82472 821n 82474 CITY OF BURLINGAME[/ARRAI'IT REGISTER 04/ 19/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tlBrd ll|.itten Checks ACCOUNT 2,420,50 619 64460 220 5190 40.00 619 64460 210 5170 20.32 621 &450 160 PAGE 8 At40u T 2,420.50 40.00 110.63 20.32 1,125.00 35.78 &9.95 212,A5 2.100.00 15 ,716.94 12,320.50 150.00 935.00 A & L JA}'/ITORIAL SERVICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PROVIDEi/CE PEST TERI.II TE PROTESSIO}.IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ARCH L'IRELESS COI,II.IUN I CAT IONS COI4I{UN I CATIONS AT&T COMI4UN I CAT IONS }IARGARET I.IO}IROE TRAVEL & I,IEETINGS TRAINING EXPENSE SMELLY MELIS PLUMBI}IG DEPOSIT RETUIIDS KATHRYN PAGE ASSOCIATES PROFESSIO},IAL & SPECIAL IZED S 21936 21947 22089 22138 22147 22219 22332 22500 22620 22751 22763 22815 216.44 221,19 't01 65100 160 527 &520 160 425 700 101 64400 2t0 101 61100 261 00 00 Z,A.P. MAI,IUTACTURING TRAFFIC COITNOL !.IATERIALS 82467 Tot't McGovER CAPITAL EOUIPI'IE},IT HACH COMPANY }IISCELLAIIEOUS COUI'ITY OT SAN I.IATEO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I.II LLS PEI{II.iSULA HEALTH SERVICES PROFESSIOIiAL & SPECIAL IZED S TRAINIIIG EXPE}ISE NORTH AI4ERI CAII SPORTS I.IANAGE}IENT 22382 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARKING COflPA}IY OF AI{ERICA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 669.95 101 65300 800 212.85 526 69020 233 2,100.00 101 68010 220 1585 15,716,91 736 &571 220 12,320,50 101 65200 220 252.OO 85 -00 101 64420 2',t0 101 65200 260 150.00 731 22520 935,00 320 80370 210 82475 JENKII,IS/ATHEIIS INS CLAII.IS ADJUSTING SERVICES 22851 8,242.00 ( 35.78 101 66210 222 ( 337.00 8,212,00 61A 64520 225 ( VENDOR DETAI Lr*' Denotes Hand Hritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 8,237.55 320 80370 210 856.00 101 68010 220 1581 392-00 101 68010 220 1588 66.71 101 65200 200 5,126.50 619 61460 210 5120 CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE L'A R R A N T R E G I S T E R 04/ 19t02 433.33 298.13 371-88 172.85 106.80 AIIOUNT I,237 .55 856.00 392.00 66.71 5 ,126.50 1,401 ,25 I ,382.99 76.17 5,7 .53 211 .32 560.00 11,517.50 390.40 82118 OAHANUKAR BRA}IDES ARCHITECTS 21?58 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S 82149 FRAI,I( I.IEEER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21311 82150 RICX BROr,fl COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES 21499 8?451 clTIcoRP VENDOR t I ilAltCE, INC. EOUI P},IENT I'IA I IIT. 21521 NUMBER NAI.IE 82153 82451 42455 8?152 SPRIG ELECTRIC PROTESS IOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S SERVICES, EOU I P',IEIIT EOUIPUENT EOU I PI.IENT EOUI PI.IEIiI EOU I PiIEIIT 21574 21613 INC.21634 ?1933 DU.ALL SAFETY TRAINING EXPEI{SE TRAINING EXPENSE TRAINING EXPENSE 560.19 120.38 420.38 101 66240 260 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 ARAI,IARK UII I FORI.I UXI FORIS AIID UI{I FOR}IS AND UNI FORI.iS A}ID UI.II FORI{S AND uilt foRfis A D 101 526 5?7 619 620 66240 69020 66520 64460 66700 140 140 140 140 110 21747 82456 TUR80 DATA SYSTEI|S, INC. 11I SCELLANEoJS 21767 82457 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE UEST, I 2I8I9 OTF I CE EXPENSE CI NGULAR !'IRELESS cofiiruNIcATIoNS 82458 SAN I.IATEO ICE CHALET CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EUNICE JEAN gALCIIA CO},ITRACTUAL SERVICES 76,17 526 69020 160 5,786,53 101 37010 241.32 101 65200 110 560.00 10't 68010 220 1t62 14,517.50 101 57010 21875 82459 sAti itATEo coUNTy Co TROLLERS OFF 21a97 MI SCEITANEOUS 82460 190.40 101 68010 220 1347 ( PAGE 7 NUI.IBER NA},IE CITY OF BURLINGAME T/ARRAXT REGISTER 04/ 19/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand ll.itten checks PAGE 6 AMOUNT 1 ,077 .53 1,861.00 356.00 208.00 56.00 474.00 174.94 2,181-00 44.93 28,716.71 1 ,200.00 2,770.00 114.36 82433 82434 RACOUET SMITII CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82435 IIOLTE & ASSOCIA]ES, INC. PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 82436 4,864.00 10'1 68010 220 1582 335.00 320 79020 210 99.73 398.94 578.86 101 68020 110 2100 101 68010 220 1100 621 61150 200 20216 ?0139 20376 20501 20513 20518 ?0706 207A3 20938 20954 20946 21009 21110 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE TRAIIIING EXPE}ISE TRAI}IING EXPEIISE 69.34 69.31 69.32 101 66?10 ?60 526 69020 260 527 66520 260 82437 DAN COFFEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82438 COUNTY OT SAN UATEO iI I SC. SUPPLIES 82139 I{ICRO ['AREHOUSE CO}IUUN I CATIONS 82110 IBS BUILDING MATNTENANCE CO. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 82141 K- 119 oF cALIFoRN1A, INC. BLDG. & GROUNOS I.{AINT. 82112 HARDISON KOMATSU IVELICH & PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8244t SCIUTII 8AY REGIONAL PUELIC TRAI}IING EXPE}ISE 42446 outcK tilx coltcREtE SIDEgALX REPAIR EXPENSE 55.00 101 68010 220 1588 474,00 101 68010 120 1320 174.94 621 64450 160 2,181.00 619 64160 220 5180 11.93 101 6a020 190 2200 28,716.71 320 76010 210 2,770,00 tot 65100 250 625.00 101 68010 120 1690 444.36 101 66210 219 42117 cEB r,{ I sc. suPpLlEs 21210 85.89 101 64350 120 85.89 (( ACCOUNT ( GE CAPITAL OFF ICE EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CITY HALL MAINTEIIANCE 625.00 20924 8?443 LAUREITCE S. itOY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82445 AI.IERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA I.II SC. SUPPL I ES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1462 82417 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA !'ATER 17764 OUES & SUESCRIPTIONS NUI.IBER NAME 82418 82419 824?4 824?5 82126 82428 82429 SPINNAKER SAI L ING CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES PARAI{OU TIS GREAT AiIERICA I.II SC. SUPPLIES COIITRACTUAL SERVICES BITL SI.II TII CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DENIIIS J. AiIOROSO CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES PRUDENT IAL OVERALL SUPPLY CO}ITRACTUAT SERVICES CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI.IARRAI{T REGISTER 04 /19/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Nand Hritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 13,706.00 526 69020 210 72.00 101 68010 220 1462 101 64010 120 1322 101 64010 220 12',t2 1,255,668.00 76010 220 PAGE 5 AMOUNT 13,706.00 72.00 5,'t40.00 678.00 75.00 '133.88 108.75 116.82 624 .17 460 -00 540.00 1778r'- 18078 1A?75 1a659 14746 18963 14970 19027 19044 19333 19366 19564 8?421 LA80R READY. IilC. TEIIIPORARY EI'IPLOYMENT SVC. 280.00 101 68010 220 1588 678.00 526 69020 011 180.00 101 68010 220 1231 75,00 't01 68010 220 158',1 133.88 101 65200 220 108.75 101 68010 220 1461 '116.82 101 54100 110 621.17 101 65200 203 460.00 619 64160 210 5200 540.00 320 80190 210 2,?22.56 101 66210 21O 320 PEGGY GUARALDI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82427 SAN MAIEO COIJNTY TIMES OFFICE EXPENSE BURTON IS TIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MATIIT. BAKERIS CHEM-DRY PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S PO!]ER WASHIIIG SERVICE PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S 19431 82430 JOHN CAHALAII, ASLA PROFESSIONAT & SPECIALIZED S 19561 42431 ( 82132 DELTA SAFETY SUPPLY CO I.' I SC. SUPPL IES 198?7 158,69 527 66s20 120 158.59 ( 290.00 4,850.00 280.00 480.00 82420 MICHAEL ADAI'I COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES 424?2 LYNI'IE FIRESTONE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,255,668.000 ( NUiIBER NAI4E 82101 82102 82401 82406 42407 82109 42410 82111 82112 8?413 82414 82115 CITY OF BI,JRLI}IGAMEIJARRAIIT REGISTER 04t19t02 VEHDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hard Uritten Checks PAGE 4 Al,l0Ul,lT 1,458.00 100.00 1 ,336.60 't68.00 801.00 699.21 1 ,200.00 116.00 144.38 10,913.03 10.63 1,241.61 199.18 57.52 SUZETTE TOLI TSO}I PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 82403 DEI,JEY PEST COI'ITROL PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIATIZEO S CllRtS licCoY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UNITED TRAIISI'II SSIOIl INC. FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. PENI}ISULA SPORTS OFTICIALS COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES L INHART PETERSEiI POI.IERS ASSOC. I,4ISCELLANEOUS EROADI.'AY BUSINESS IlI SCELLAIIEOUS STATE OF CALI FOR}I IA SUPPLIES COLORPRINT OIGITAL I.{ I SC. SUPPLIES ACCOIJ T 1t2.00 101 68010 220 1588 1,458.00 101 68010 150 1451 100.00 101 66210 210 1,336.60 101 65200 203 168.00 101 68010 220 1588 80't.00 101 68010 220 1587 699.24 527 66520 230 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1581 336.00 '!01 68010 220 1s88 111.38 l0'l 56210 210 10,913.03 731 22515 40.63 731 22555 1 ,244.61 620 15000 199.18 101 64100 120 57.s2 625 65213 203 IELEKEY SCADA SYSTETIS IIIC. PUII1P EOUIPMENT REPAIR 82108 ACTION SPORTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES IIAROTD FIELDS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COT.IMUIII TY GATEPATH PROTESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11218 14?94 14338 11760 15529 15711 16085 16167 16138 16575 16599 16449 16919 17497 17546H I -TECH EI.IERGEiJCY VEHICLE FIRE APPARATUS I,IAI IIT. 82416 PIONEER RAI/DUSTRIAL BLDG. & GRq,JNDS I.IAI NT. 17547 792.00 101 68020 190 2200 792.00 (( 1 12.00 82405 Ttlt oLEl,to COXIRACTUAL SERVICES CITY OF BURLIIIGAi4E9ARRANT REG I STER 04/ 19 t02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks 09670 097?0 09790 11361 11571 13940 11007 191.29 198.95 152,14 325.13 181.56 11 .33 't37,72 32.16 26.15 191.81 '101 '10'l 101 526 526 526 527 529 529 619 101 101 320 526 527 68020 68020 68020 69020 69020 69020 66520 68030 68030 64460 ( 120 130 190 120 130 233 120 1?0 130 120 2200 2200 4200 4200 5120 ACCOUNT 120 2200 222 120 260 260 A}.{OUNT I ,751.91 375.87 3, '188. 19 38.07 1 ,036.00 23.73 106.77 519. 00 410.29 2.381.50 iJUMBER NAME 42391 82392 82193 42395 82396 82399 ORCIIARD SUPPLY HARDI'ARE UISC. SUPPLIES SI.IALL TOOLS BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. I.I I SC. SUPPLIES sl,lAt L T00Ls IIISCELLA}IEOUS MISC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SI4ALL TOOLS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SEOUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL OFFI CE EXPENSE THE ADAM-HILL COMPAI/Y FIRE APPARATUS MAI NT. SCH}'AAB, INC. OFT ICE EXPENSE AT&T UTILITY EXPEIISE ELECTRO.I'IOTION I NCORPORATED PUI4P EOUIPI.IENT REPAIR PUMP EOUI PI,IE}IT REPAIR 375.87 101 64250 110 IIITERSTATE TRAFFIC I,I I SC. SUPPLIES TRAFFIC CONTROL IIATERIALS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES TRAII,IIIIG EXPENSE TNAINING EXPENSE 178.61 2,548,75 341 .E 90-93 2a -15 68020 6r210 80240 69020 66520 EI4PLOYMENT DEVELOPI.IENT DEPARTMEN 10567 I.IISCELLAIIEOUS 82394 LEE STA}IBOLIS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11684 82397 cfil4AtR itEcHANtcAL SERVTCES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11773 82398 38.07 101 57500 017 '1.056.00 101 58010 220 1588 23.75 625 65213 203 106.77 101 64250 110 319.00 619 61160 210 5110 110.29 896 20281 526 690 5?7 665 23 21 20 20 1 ,190.75 1,190.75 0 0 82400 INVENSYS I'IETERING SYSTEI.IS CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT 14114 10,025.23 526 69020 E00 10,025.23 ( PAGE 3 ( 82390 NUI4EER llAl'lE 82375 DO}.I PI.AGIIANN CONTRACTUAT SERVICES 82376 PUTNAM EUICK PONTIAC GI.IC VEHICTE I.IA I NT. 82377 VENOOR OETAIL!*r oenotes Hand llritten Checks 0317? ( ACCOUNT 493.00 101 68010 220 1581 6,512.50 101 55200 250 13,334.81 731 22562 1,321.57 101 68010 250 1100 640,00 5?6 69020 233 115.00 526 69020 160 998.68 101 64250 220 2,200.00 101 61250 110 773.25 to'l 68010 220 ,t344 210.00 621 64450 ?00 9,921,44 101 65.100 201 1,941.35 320 71171 210 857.55 10'l 66100 210 CITY OF BURLITIGAMEI.'ARRANT REGISTER 01/ 19102 PAGE 2 AMOUI/T 193.00 10.54 6,512.50 13,331.84 1 ,321 .57 640.00 11.5.00 998.68 2,200.00 773.25 210. 00 9 ,921 .11 1 ,94',t .35 857 .35 559.36 01518 82380 SEAUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS I.I I SCE L LAiIE OUS 03536 82381 PACIFIC I'EST SECURITY, INC. cotluuN I cATtoNS 0360't 82382 STATECO}ITROLLER COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 03666 03821 8?384 CITY OF SAN iIATEO TRAVEL & I{EETIXGS SA}I I,4ATEO U}T IO}I HtGH SCH@L DEVELOPI.IEIIT FEE RANDY SCHIJARTZ TRAVEL & }IEET INGS JEAN BUCKS CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 03206 03366 0347142378 8?379 09019 82385 cotT/0'coltltoR CITY IIALL I'IAINTENANCE 0913? 82386 oLYMPrAil OtL co!.tPAllY GAS, OIL & GREASE 09238 82387 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 09461 82388 ocE '.BRU} |,tG, INC. PRoFESSIo AL & SPECIATTZEO S 09193 82389 09543RON HOULE TRAINIIIG EXPEiISE (( 10.54 101 65200 202 82383 U S POSTAL SERVTCE OFFICE EXPETISE 559.36 101 55200 260 CITY 0F BURLINGAI'IE I,JARRANT REGISTER 04t19/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks NUI{EER NAME 82361 ALPIiIE AWARDS, INC. I.II SC. SUPPL IES BAYSHORE INTERNATIOiIAL TRUCKS FIRE APPARATUS I4AINT. 82363 ACCOUNT 430.29 101 58010 120 1581 21.81 101 65200 203 150.95 10'l 68020 260 2300 20,002.26 731 22563 01052 01236 01400 01500 0?149 02157 02160 02261 02645 02a72 02880 02898 59.75 16.60 17.10 AMOUNT 130.29 21 .81 '150.95 20,002.26 20,234.00 720.00 103.43 93.45 1,662.19 123.26 4,800.00 20,398.90 411.39 82362 82364 82365 82367 82366 82369 82370 82371 82372 82373 BRENIOI{ SATETY, INC. TRAINIIIG EXPEI,ISE BURLI}IGAME ELEI,I- SCHML DISI, SCHOOL DEVELOPI'IENT FEE CITY OF REDI.IOOD CITY COMI,4IJN I CAT IONS CITY HALL I'IAI }ITEIIANCE EIJING IRRIGATTO}I PRODUCTS I,I I SCELLANEOUS FEDERAL EXPRESS r,4l sc, suPPLtEs MISC. SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES 400.00 19,83/r.00 621 61150 160 621 61150 220 720.OO 101 64010 220 't312 103.43 101 68020 192 2200 10'1 68020 120 2'100 320 75110 't 20 620 66700 120 GRANITE ROCK COI,IPANY STREET RESURFACING EXPE}ISE K & I.I OISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP I.I I SC. SUPPLIES I,{AYNE TREE EXPERT CO., INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES US fILTER I,I I SC. SUPPLIES I.4I SCELLANEOUS 1,662.19 101 66210 226 123.26 101 66210 120 4,800.00 101 68020 220 2300 16,993.29 3,405.61 526 69020 120 526 69020 233 HI LLBRAE LUI,IBER CO. SI.{ALL TOOLS BLDG. & GROUIIDS IIAINT. SIDEIIALK REPAIR EXPENSE I.' I SC. SUPPLIES 101 66210 130 101 68020 190 101 66210 219 ,26 69020 120 2200 4.84 94.32 180.50 131 .73 8?371 KPI.IG LLP MISCELLAIIEOUS 03109 30,000.00 101 15100 30.000.00 ( 82366 GENE EVAiIS CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES (( 01862 PAGE I (( 04- 12-200? NAiIE TOTAL FOR APPROVAT CITY OF BURL I }IGAI4E9ARRAIIT REGTSTER TUND RECAP . 01-02 PACE 10 AMOUNT GENERAL FUND CAPIIAL II.IPROVEI.iE}ITS FUIID LiATER CAPITAL PROJECT TUND SEI.,ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND IIATER FUND SE!JER FUNO GOLF CENTER FUND SELF IiISURA}ICE TU}ID FACI LIT I ES SERVICES FU}ID EOUI P}IE},IT SERVICES FU}ID INFORMATION SERVICES FUiID FIRE IIECHAIIIC SENVICES fUIID TRUST AND AGENCY FUIID UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 56,599,67 '100,058.84 23,765.30 67 ,3U.08 6,951 .43 21,519.95 2,619.68 5,086.48 2,419,32 11 ,701 .72 4n.59 17.62 17,375.36 5,675.51 FUIIO 101 320 326 327 526 527 529 6't8 619 620 621 525 731 896 $324,652.65 HONORABLE TIAYOR AIO CITY COUI,ICIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY TIIAT THE CLAII,IS LISTED ON PAGES NUMEERED FROM 1 THROUGII 10INCLUSM, AilD/OR CIATMS NUUBERED FROfi 82238 TXROUGH 82360 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING INTHE AMOUNT OT 5324,652,65, HAVE BEEN CIIECKED IN DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY TI{E PROPEROFFICIALS, ANO III I.IY OPIIIION REPRESENT FAIR A}ID JUST CBANGES AGAIIST THE CITY I}I ACCORDAIICE i.IITH TIIETR RESPECTIVE AI.IOIJNTS AS INDICATED THEREOII. RESPECTFULLY SUBI,!ITTED, FINANCE DIRECIOR APPROVED FOR PAYI.IEIIT OATE DATE ( COUNCI L (( NUI,48ER 82355 CITY OF BURLINGAIIEIt'ARRANT REGISTER 04/12/02 NAIIE VENOORrrr Denotes fiord tJritten Checks HAYAT CAR RENTAL SYSTE',IS IiIC. 23607 BUSIXESS LICENSE REIU}IO 82356 ROEERT ROSELLI II I SCE L LAN ECIJS 23608 82357 coREY SIXON CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES ?3609 82358 JEFF SCHI'ARTZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23610 82359 lto.tAsrER-cARR SUppLy co. I,I I SC. SUPPLTES 23611 82360 CAL I FORNIA EiIS ACADEI{Y TRAINI}IG EXPENSE 23612 TOTAL DETAIL ACCoUIIT 500.00 101 30700 260.00 101 16620 56.00 101 68010 220 1587 28.00 101 68010 220 1587 334.25 619 64460 120 5,t80 190.00 101 65200 260 PAGE 9 Al,40uIT 500.00 260.00 56.00 28.00 334.25 190.00 $321,652.65 ( CITY OF EURLINGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER 04t12/02 VE}IDOR DETAIL '*' Denotes HaM ttritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 992.36 526 69020 233 800.00 320 80200 2't0 197.24 101 66210 250 400.00 101 66210 250 2,743.02 320 75170 220 1,9?2.98 731 22522 1,610.00 101 65100 260 1,610.00 101 65100 260 t00.00 731 22525 500.00 731 22525 323.67 101 64420 250 341.97 101 65150 140 PAGE 8 NUiIBER }IAME 82339 82310 82341 82312 82343 42344 82345 82346 82347 82318 8?349 82350 82351 82352 CRESCo EoUIP EilT REI{TALS 23170 }I I SC. SUPPL IES STREET RESURFACIIIG EXPEXSE 102.31 36.62 101 66.210 120 101 66210 226 KORALEE}I EIITERPRISES I.i I SCELLA}IEOUS AI,IOI.INT 134.96 992.36 500.00 800.00 400,00 2,743.02 1 ,922.98 1,610.00 1,610.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 323.67 381 .97 JANICE TJOL TE I.I I SCELLAI,IEOI,,S OLD REPUBLIC TITLE PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S SEAPORT I.IAR I NA IIOTEL TRAVEL & }IEETINGS TRACo 2002 TRAVEL & I.IEETI}IGS EASTI.IAN KODAK CO. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES sB!,ttA IIlISCELLANEOUS JULIE DAVIS TRAIIIING EXPEI.ISE BRIAN GATES TRAINING EXPEIISE GARY }I ICHOLS }IISCELLANECTJS JII{ gAND I.I I SCELLANEOUS BART GAUL III SCELLANEOUS FRANKLIN COVEY TRAVEL & IEEIII.IGS 23510 23516 21579 23595 23596 23597 23599 23600 23601 23602 23603 23604 23605 82351 BPO CONSTRUCTION IIISCELLA}IEOUS 23606 310.00 731 22546 310.00 ( 500,00 731 22543 500.00 731 ?2525 ( 497.28 25598 82353 EATTERY U}IIVERSE UNI TORI.IS IND EOUIPI{ENT 82323 MUSSOI TRAIIIING EXPENSE StLVERADO AVI0t{tCS RAD IO I,iAINT. J.t4, RIDG!/AY C0. CAPITAL EOUIPT.IENT ERIC SYI.IA}ISKI CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES ROGER AIIDREY TRAINING EXPENSE ING LEGALS PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING LI BERTY INDUSTRIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 82528 VERIZoN UTRELESS co fluN I cAT I O[ S STOFFEL SEALS CORPORAT IOII UII I FORI.IS AI{D EOUIP}IE}IT CIIRIS I,II LANO COIITRACTUAT SERVICES PENII{SULA UNI FORI.I & EAUIPME}IT I'IISCELLAIEOUS ( ACCOUNT 218.44 101 65200 260 245,55 101 65200 205 340.00 529 68010 800 4200 28.00 101 68010 220 1587 106-35 527 665?0 120 104.73 101 68020 160 2300 487.80 101 55150 140 575.00 101 68010 220 1581 627-75 61A 64520 60t L13-aA 10'1 64200 150 ( CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IEI./ARRANT REGISTER 04t12t02 VENDOR DETAIL!*' Denotes Hand lJritten Checks PAGE 7 NU}IBER }IAI4E 82324 82325 82326 82327 82329 82330 82331 8?332 82333 82331 82335 PI]NEY BOIIES OFIICE EXPENSE COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES AT&T HIRELESS cofiiruN I cAT t 0|l s TIIE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP TRAIilIIIG EXPENSE 94 00 101 65'100 110 'i01 65100 220 22270 22286 ?2115 22429 22512 22593 22625 22769 22899 ?2985 230?1 23128 69 290 A}.{OUNT 245,55 340.00 28.00 106.35 487.80 627 .75 620.00 /./.3.88 359.94 49.00 3,521 .80 2,000.00 23169 a2336 t{ovA PARTNERS, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZEO S 23?36 82337 49.00 101 55200 '!60 3,521.80 320 7s'l',t' 210 2,000.00 101 61420 262 82338 lBlrt coRPoRArtoN EOUIPI.IEIIT T{AINT. 23125 236.55 101 65300 200 236.55 620.00 tot 65100 260 ( 218.44 104,73 575.00 ?3367 CITY OF EURL I I,IGAT.IE !,ANRA T REGISTER 04/12/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand U.itten Checks PAGE 6 500 -00 23,765,30 7,966.12 275 .00 I ,?17 .04 290,25 192,00 454.51 1,000.00 413.11 636.12 851 .32 8?307 CATHERIIIE J,I.i. }IILI.IEYER iIISCELLANEqJS NUI.IBER NAI.IE 82308 82309 82319 82320 aB21 82310 ESA E IIV I ROI,II.,IEN TAL SCIENCE ASSOC DEPOSIT RETUND 21160 8?311 TILTERFRESH COFFEE EXCELLEXCE COMI'IUN I CATIONS 21523 82312 ORLANDI TRAI LER, INC. CAPITAL EOUIPI,IENT 21667 82313 TRACY SIRI CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 21685 82314 cflRtssY HoLl'{Es CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21723 82315 DARRYL STELL!]AY SUPPLIES 21766 82316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OF THE IIEST, I 21819 MISCELLANEOUS 82317 I{ANDEGO, INC. t.II SC. SUPPLIES 21855 82318 21948 JASON GILI{ORE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ROMAN & LOUGEE, IIIC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S VB GOLT LLC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GI'IAC PAYI.IENT PROCESSING CENTER CAPITAL EOU I PI,IENT OFFICER ROBERT BOLL TRAIXING EXPENSE AMERICAN VAN EOUIPI{ENT I}IC. SI4ALL TOOLS ACCOUNT 500.00 731 22525 200.00 101 68,010 220 ,346 23,765,30 326 79530 210 7,96.12 731 ?2590 275.OO 621 &450 160 1,247.04 529 68030 8oo 4200 290.25 101 68010 220 '1345 192.00 101 68010 220 1312 55.00 620 15000 751.A1 101 64400 115 154.54 tot 58010 120 lt89 1,000.00 529 68,030 220 u3.44 101 66't00 800 636,12 101 65100 260 851.32 619 64160 130 20801 20926 20963 22006 22023 22031 82322 ARCH !'IRELESS co}fl,tuN I cAT t 0!t s 22089 10.80 101 58020 160 2200 10.80 ((( AI4OUN] 200.00 55.00 751.81 CITY OF BURLINGAT.iEL'ARRANT REC I STER 04t 12t02 VEIIDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand ltritten Checks 101 64200 150 320 80510 210 619 64460 210 320 80410 220 621 6t1450 160 PAGE 5 AMOUNI 208.00 260.71 678.00 4,233.0? 122.10 3,375.00 56.00 /.,036.00 250.00 65,720.05 22,002.ao 315.01 }IU}IBER NAI,4E 42292 82293 82294 42295 a2296 82297 82298 82299 82300 82301 82302 82303 a2304 82305 GEORGE MASTALIR CONIRACTUAL SERVICES CRANE PES] CONTROL PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALTZED S TO}IY I S UPIIOLSIERY SUPPLIES LABOR READY, INC. TEI.IPORARY EI.IPLOYMENT SVC. DEAN'S AUTO BODY & I.{ I SCELLANE(r,'S LIEEERT CASSIDY IdH I TI'IORE TRAIIIIIIG EXPENSE ERIC GIESEKER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POL'ER LIASI'I I NG SERVICE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S ALL FEilCE gOlPAltY, INC. 8LDG. & GRdjNDS I.IAIIIT. CREATIVE II{TERCONNECT COI.IMUN I CAT I ON S AFFI!IIIEL COIiIUII I CAT I O}I S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CO6iI.IUN I CATIONS PACI FIC GAS & ELECTRIC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES C,H.8ULL COT,IPAIIY S}IALL T@LS 18088 18105 18173 18659 18795 19083 19095 19191 19564 19710 19768 20216 20335 20459 109.62 131 .04 181.44 ACC0U T 208.00 101 68010 220 1589 102.00 619 64160 210 5110 260.71 620 '.t5000 4,233.02 518 64520 604 AI,IG NEUSPAPERS PUBLICATIO}IS & ADVERTISING PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZEO S PROTESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,375.00 101 61120 262 56.00 101 58010 220 1587 /r,036.00 101 66210 210 250.00 527 66520 190 228.36 101 65200 160 65,620.05 100.00 22,002.A0 320 75110 220 115 - 0r 619 61460 130 82306 PHIL SCOTT TRAVEL & UEETINGS 20550 572.43 527 66520 250 572.43 (( 678.00 526 69020 011 ( 102.00 ?28.36 r,{IKE S ITli CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82286 CINTAS CoRP. #464 UNI FORiIS AND EOUIPI,4ENI 82287 GOLDEN NURSERY t.II SC. SUPPLIES a2?88 ETRo IO8ILE CO ]|U], CATIO S EOUIPMEIIT IIAI }IT. 822A2 VALLEY OIL CO. SUPPLIES I{ D LINEN SERVICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JOSEPII UI LL IA}I MCCLAI}I COiITRACTUAL SERVICES COLORPRINT DIGITAL OFFICE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES ( ACCOUNT 1,001.31 101 68020 120 2200 2,665.00 525 69020 210 789.00 101 65'150 200 3,288.41 101 65100 220 9,176.51 620 15000 109,66 101 65200 220 56.00 101 68010 220 1587 234.00 101 68010 220 1589 640.90 101 6aO20 110 2200 95.61 320 78/.90 120 570.43 101 65150 200 CITY OF BURLINGAMEUARNANT REGI STER 01t 12t02 VEI,IDOR DETAIL '*r Denotes H.nd [r.itten Checks PAGE 4 82277 ROMEO PACKITG CO I,I I SC. SUPPLIES I.IVP REPAIR SERVICE CO. PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAT IZED S 82?79 ARC ELECTRIC EOUI PiIEIIT I,4AI }IT. 82280 ALL CITY }IANAGE}.IE}IT CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES }IUI,48ER NAIIE 87278 82281 8?283 822A4 82285 82289 1 1348 11739 13613 15595 15739 15764 15827 16066 16637 16911 17128 17102 17497 17534 AMOUIIT 1 ,001 .31 2,665.00 789.00 3,248.44 111.95 9,476.54 109.66 56.00 234.00 640.90 95.61 570.13 583.08 2,1r9.07 146.14 8.55 187.67 102.59 101 68020 200 2200 527 &520 120 620 15000 621 61150 110 111,71 471.37 101 66210 110 527 66520 120 2,159.07 320 80510 220 8??91 CE}ITRAL EUSINESS EOUIPMENT EOUIPI4ENT I,IAINT. 18011 680.89 101 65150 200 680.89 (( I,{I LLERAE LOCK SIIOP EOUIP!{ENT IlAI }IT. I{ I SC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES OFFICE EXPE}iSE 42290 PENI}.ISULA DIGTTAL I I{AG I }IG COITRACTUAL SERVICES NUMEER NAI.{E 82263 82274 82275 LYIIGSO GARDEII I.IATER IALS iII SC. SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES iII SC. SUPPLIES CAL-STEA}I MISC. SUPPLIES utsc. suPPLlEs DOROTHY OI GRADY i,II SC. SUPPLIES t'IISC. SUPPLIES 358.00 101 67500 037 116.11 549.85 101 66210 120 527 66520 120 194.85 129.90 526 69020 120 527 66520 120 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 4A5.63 17,751.00 367.00 96.50 ?01 ,97 359.45 267 .92 107.17 85.00 665.99 321.75 CITY OF BURLINGAME UARRANT REGISTER 04t12t02 VENDOR DETAILt*t Denotes Hand tlritten checks 82?64 !,ALTER GRENN CO}iTRACTUAL SERVICES 42265 CITY OT MILTBRAE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42266 AI'IERICA}I PLANNING ASSOCIATION DUES & SUESCRIPT IOIIS 82267 42269 SEOIEIA U}IION HIGH SCI{OOL OFFICE EXPENSE 82270 I}ITERSTATE TRAFFIC UN I FORI{S AND EOUIP}IENT 82271 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPI|ICS }I I SC. SUPPL IES 82272 ALERT D00R SERVICE, INC, I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 82273 485.63 101 68010 220 1341 17,754"00 101 65200 220 367.00 101 64400 240 95.50 618 64520 604 548.83 259.80 268.83 10't 58020 120 320 78490 1?0 526 69020 120 77 .26 tot 68020 190 2300 't0t 68020 200 2200 ACCOUNT 267.92 101 65400 140 107.17 101 66100 120 85.00 619 64460 120 51aO 09143 09147 09231 09102 09518 09560 o9720 09790 09990 10059 10557 11020 ?200 AEAG . L IABI LITY TIISCELLANEOUS 82268 SAN I.IATEO LATJN I,{O!'ER SIIOP BLDG. & CRCIJIIDS ,,AINT. EOUIP}IENT I.IAI }IT. E}IPLOYI'IENT DEVELOPI.IEIJT DEPARI}IE}I 10567 IISCELLATEOUS 82276 IiEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 11101 117,36 320 79020 210 117.36 (( 359.45 ',101 65100 110 ( I ,077.46 358.00 CITY OT BURLIIIGAIiEIIARRAIIT REGISTER 04/12t02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks PAGE 2 028'19 82252 I4AYXE TREE EXPERT CO., INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 02872 82253 KAVANAGH EIIGINEERI I,IG PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZEO S r,rAll P0!,ER TEiIPORARY EMPLOYTIENT SVC. I.IOTOROLA INC. SUPPLIES ACCOUNT 1,800.00 320 80190 210 115.20 1o',t 65300 011 82.50 327 78534 210 173.03 620 15000 NUMEER HA}iE 82?50 82251 42254 42256 82257 82258 8?259 82260 82261 02665 02914 03041 03054 03080 03106 03158 03536 03910 03964 394.24 -44,11 I ,376.00 22.51 129.21 '1,500.00 AI.IOIJNT 1 .800.00 115.20 82.50 I8.03 1 ,362.74 81.77 5,675.61 104.89 80.00 710 - 00 3,377.89 365.09 PACIFIC NURSERIES MISC. SUPPLIES I,I I SC. SUPPLIES ii|ISCELLAIIEOUS 320 78/90 120 529 68030 120 /.200 731 22560 98r.78 32.61 344.32 82215 P. c. & E. GAS & ELECTRIC PACI FIC BELL U]ILITY EXPENSE PATTERSON PARTS, INC SUPPLIES STEPHEN J. PICCXI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SEOUOIA A}IALYTICAL LABS }II SCELLANEOUS BURLINGAI.IE REC. DEPT../PETTY CASH I,I I SC. SUPPLIES 8LDG. & GROUNDS I{AINT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S lllscELLAliE0us MI SCELLANEOUS u.77 101 66240 170 5,675.61 896 20241 101.89 6?0 15000 80-00 '101 6a010 220 1572 730,00 526 69020 233 IJEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. }IISC. SUPPLIES 365.09 l0l 643t0 120 82262 STATE OT CAICONSERVAT ION OEPT iIISCELLANEOTJS 09073 2,801.94 731 22550 2,AO1,94 ((( 101 68010 120 1570 101 68020 190 2200 101 68010 220 1347 520 80140 210 618 64520 604 731 22543 NUI4BER I,IAME 82238 GRAY'S PAIIIT, BURLINGAi.IE 01025 TRAFTIC CONTROL MATENIALS MISC. SUPPLIES 82?39 0't3'13 ( HANBOR SAND & GRAVEL I.I I SC. SUPPLIES BURL INGA}IE AUTO SUPPLY GAS, OIL & GREASE VEHICLE }.,IAINT. FIRE APPARATUS I,4AINT. EOUIPI'IENT MAINT. MISC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TRAIN ING EXPENSE T IRE APPARATUS MAINT. CITY OF BURLINGAME lIARRANT REGISTER 04/12/02 VENDOR DETAILr"' Denotes Hand [rritten Checks ( ACCOUNT 242.05 ',lot 56210 120 67 ,301 ,5A 8,680.61 9,006.86 4,436.2A 327 79180 z't0 527 66130 190 527 66530 210 527 66530 800 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 113-26 212.05 1 ,073.70 343 -35 312.13 496.88 1,770.16 a9,4?5,33 98.85 I ,357 .46 a.61 131.62 101 &210 222 619 61160 120 82240 8??11 01676 01857 02014 02017 02110 02157 02625 101 101 101 526 527 620 620 625 65200 65200 65200 69020 (6520 't5000 66700 6s213 201 202 203 200 120 260 203 54,16 117.79 44.95 64.93 7 .75 724.65 41 .5s 17.62 EURLINGAI'IE STATIONERS OTFICE EXPENSE 8??12 GCS TIESTERII POIIER & SUPPLI ES 82213 I.'ACEK DENNAqJI CONTRACIUAL SERVICES 82214 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION EOUIPI.IEI,IT iIAINT. 8224s US FI LTER OPERATING SERVICES PROTESSIONAL & SqECIALIZED S BLDG. & GROU}IDS I{AINT. PROFESSTOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S CAPITAL EOUIPI4ENT 82?46 EUI}IG IRRIGATION PROOUCTS I.I I SCELLANEOUS 82247 Li.l', cRAINGER, tNC. EOUIPIIE}IT I.IAINT. A2248 IIO!]ARD JOI.JES BAIIERIES. INC. SUPPL IES 312.43 520 15000 496,88 101 68010 220 1341 1,770.16 101 65150 200 98.85 101 68020 192 2200 1 ,357.45 126 69020 200 385.25 620 15000 A2249 K & I.I DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP I,4I SC. SUPPL IES 02645 11s.68 619 61160 120 5140 415.68 ( 01507 3A5,25 ozua 343.35 ',101 56100 ll0 r STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE s l20l02 TO: IIONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BY DArE: May 13,2002 APPROVED FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager BY 650-558-7222 sTIBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Agreement Regarding On-CaII Cleanups RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution authorizing amendment to the franchise agreement. BACKGROUI\ID: In February 2001, BFI, as part ofthe proposed changes to the uniform refuse collection franchise agreement, eliminarted two scheduled cleanups in the spring and fall and replaced them with two on- call cleanups. The program was expected to benefit residents by allowing them the ease of scheduling cleanups at their convenience. BFI expected that it would be easier to glean recyclables from an on-call prograrn, since they would not be preoccupied with the massive task of removing the cleanup debris from the entire city on the same day. The trial project has proved successfirl; staffrecommends that the franchise agreement be amended to reflect the new on-call procedure ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Amendment to Agreement l' RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH BROWNING,FERRTS INDUSTRTES (BFI) FOR SOLID WASTE, RECYCLABLE MATERIALS, AND PLANT MATERIALS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the current franchise agreement with BFI provides that BFI is to provide certain special collections; and WHEREAS, the City and BFI agreed to test a system of on-call special collection twice a year, rather than two service area-wide special collections; and WHEREAS, the on-call special collection service has proven successful and should be continued; and WHEREAS, amendment of the franchise agreement to establish this service would benefit the City and the community, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Mayor is authorized and requested to execute the First Amendment to the Franchise Agreement between the City and BFI as contained in Exhibit A hereto. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Mayor. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the -day of -2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COI-INCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 13,2002 PUBLIC WORKS 7:,rD-u-e 5t20to2 ) TO: DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN APPLICATION AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AND RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING AND DEDICATING THE SEWER SYSTEM USE CHARGES TO REPAYMENT OF THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOANS - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 9948 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the following resolutions for a State Revolving Fund loan application for Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements, City project No. 9948: o resolution authorizing the City Manager to file an applicationo resolution identiffing and dedicating revenue BACKGROUND: The State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Clean Water provides low interest State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans for wastewater treatment plant improvements. City staffthough U.S. Filter, our treatment plant operator, have contracted with Carollo Engineers to design reliability and operational improvements. The total cost is estimated to be $11.4 Million, including all design and construction administration. Improvements include: o New sludge dewatering building and equipmento New electrical buildingo Headworks building equipment upgradeo Replacement vacuum truck unloading facility. Equipment upgrade to the aeration basins and facilitieso New in-plant pump station modificationso Supervisory and control system upgrades within the Treatment Plant and to the Rollins Road lift stationo Miscellaneous equipmentreplacements Water Resources Board staff have approved the eligibility of a significant portion of our improvements for an SRF loan. The estimated loan eligibility is $10.2 Million based on the actual accepted tow biA received. Staff and its financing advisor have reviewed the estimated bond rates compared to the SRF loan rate. The SRF loan provides a significant savings to the City. The attached resolutions provide authorizations that are necessary to complete the loan application. Staff expects approval of the loan in August with the two year construction project starting in late summer. EXHIBITS: Resolutions 'l Page2 BUDGET IMPACT: Loan proceeds are expected to finance all project-related costs over the two year construction period. The City is required to begin paying back the loan within one year of project completion. This expenditure has been included in the long-term sewer financial plan and will be funded through increases in sewer rates. Asst. Public Works Director 6s0-558-7230 c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Repons\948SRFloan-Rev and Sign Res.SR.wpd RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OT' THE CITY COT]NCIL OT' TIIE CITY OF BT]RLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE STATE REVOLVING FTJTID LOAI\I APPLICATION AND ACCOMPAI\YING DOCT'MENTS FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAI\TT IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 9948 RESOLVED, bythe City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame wishes to apply to State Water Resources Control Board for financial assistance for the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvement Project, City Project No. 9948; and WHEREAS, the State requires that the City adopt a resolution authorizing this application, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file, for an on behalf of the City of Burlingame, a Financial Assistance Application for a loan from the State Water Resources Control Board in an amount of $10,159,000 for the planning, design, and construction of the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvement Project. 2. The City Manager or the Manager's designee is fi.rther authorized and directed to certifii that the City of Burlingame has and will comply with all applicable State and Federal statutory and regulatory requirements related to any Federal and State loans received. 3. The City Manager or the Manager's designee is further authorized and directed to certiSr that the City of Burlingame has and will comply with all applicable State and Federal statutory and regulatory requirements related to any Federal and State loans received. 4. The City Manager is further authorized to negotiate and execute a loan/grant contract and any amendments or change orders thereto and execute such additional documents as may be necessary for the loan application. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of _, 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME IDENTIT"TING AND DEDICATING THE SEWER SYSTEM USE CHARGES TO REPAYMENT OF THE STATE REVOLYING FUND LOAI\S PURSUAIIT TO THE TERMS OF TIIE LOAII AGREEMENTS AS REQUIRJD BY 33 U.S.C. $ 1383 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the provisions of 33 United States Code (U.S.C.) section 1383 require that State Revolving Fund loans made pursuant to the Clean Water Act provide that recipient agencies dedicate a source of revenue to the repayment of the loan; and WHEREAS, the sewer service charges paid by the City's ratepayers will be the source of revenue from which any loans from the State Revolving Fund will generallybe paid, subject to the terms of the loan agreements and recognizing that those service charges will also be used for other purposes and may be used for other financing on a parity or subordinate basis, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve as follows: l. The sewer service charges of the City are hereby identified and dedicated to repayment of any all State Revolving Fund loans on Project No. C-06-4772-110 as provided in the applicable loan agreements with the understanding that the sewer service charges will also be used to pay maintenance and operating expenses of the wastewater system and may be pledged and applied to repay other obligations of the City on a pafity or subordinate basis, including but not limited to bonds, notes, leases, and installment contracts. 1 Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiSr that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the - day of -, 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C :\FILES\RESO\dedicatsewerfee.pwd.wpd 2 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM# MTG. DATE 7i 5-20-02 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DArE: May 13,2fi)2 FRoM: Randy Schwartz (55&7307) SUBJECT:AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE PENINSULA YMCA ALLOWING FOR BT]RLINGAME RESIDENTS USE OF THE SKATEPARK OPERATED BY THE YMCA AND THE CITY OF MILLBRAE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Burlingame and the Peninsula Family YMCA. BACKGROUND: The City of Millbrae and the YMCA are constructing a skatepark near the campus of Mills High School, just north of the BurlingameAvlillbrae Border. This agreement will allow Burlingame residents, for the next twenty-five (25) years, to enjoy use of the facility and at the same entrance fee charged to yMCA members and City of Millbrae residents. The total construction cost of the skatepark is approximately $850,000. The City of Millbrae has contributed approximately $125,000 in addition to the land and has obtained a $75,000 grant from Land and Water Conservation. The YMCA has raised the remaining funds through donations and grants. Under this agreement, the City of Millbrae and the YMCA shall be responsible for the operation of the park, including staffing, maintenance, etc. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: The City of Burlingame will donate $100,000 towards the construction of the skatepark. These f,urds are currently in the City's Capital Improvement project budget. Approved BY Su BY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH PENINSULA FAMILY YOUNG CHRISTIAN MEN'S ASSOCIATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF A SKATE PARK RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the Peninsula Family Young Christian Men's Association (YMCA) and the City of Millbrae have undertaken the development and construction of a skate park at 521Millbrae Avenue, Millbrae, California, near the northern boundary of the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the YMCA and the City of Millbrae have graciously agreed to allow residents of Burlingame to use the park on the same basis as YMCA members and Millbrae residents in return for a contribution of $100,000 toward the construction costs of the park; and WHEREAS, this skate park will provide a wonderful recreational opportunity for residents of Burlingame as well as others; and WHEREAS, this will be a one-time contribution, and the YMCA and the City of Millbrae will undertake the operation of the park, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLYED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Skate Park Agreement between the City and the Peninsula Family Young Christian Men's Association District as contained in Exhibit A hereto. 2- The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the Cify of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL May 15,2002 Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/ Administrative Services Director AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE s l20l o2 7k TO: DATE: FROM: BY BY stiBJECT: Resolution of Intention: Broadway Area Business Improvement District - Setting 2002-2003 Assessments RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution of intention and set public hearing BACKGROLIND: Each year apublic hearing is scheduled to adopt a resolution of intention for the next fiscal year Broadway area Business lmprovement District assessments. The BID Annual Report and2002- 2003 Budget have been submitted. There are no changes in boundaries, assessments or classification. 'Ihe recommended hearing date is June 17, 20OZ at 7:00 p.m. BUDGET IMPACT: Approximately $25,000 in assessments are collected annually with our business licenses. All of these funds are forwarded to the Broadway Improvement District for improvements as authorized the BID Board of Directors. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BT'RLINGAME DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH 2002-2003 ASSESSMENTS FOR THE BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to Califomia Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., the Broadway Area Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of promoting economic revitalization and physical maintenance of this business district; and WHEREAS, the Broadway Area Business Improvement District Advisory Board has filed its 2001-2002 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments for the2002-2003 year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the annual report for 2001-2002, andit appears that the BroadwayArea Business Improvement District continues to provide services in enhancing the District and its businesses and properties, NOW, THEREFORE, the CityofBurlingame does herebyresolve, determine, and find as follows: 1. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2002-2003 fiscal year on businesses in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance No. 1461, to pay for improvements and activities of the District. 2. The types of improvements and activities proposed to be funded by the levy of assessments on businesses in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference. These activities and improvements are without substantial change from those previously established for the District. 3. The method, basis, and amounts for levying the assessments on all businesses within the District are set forth in Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference, and would remain the same as those levied in the previous fiscal year. 4. New businesses shall not be exempt from assessment. 5. A public hearing on the proposed assessments for 2002-2003 is hereby set for June 17,2002, at 7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at the Council's Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia. 6. TheCouncilwillreceivetestimonyandevidenceatthepublic hearing, and interested I persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail or delivered to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. 7 . Oral or written protests may be made at the hearing. To count in a majority protest against the proposed assessment for 2002-2003, a protest must be in writing and submitted to the City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on May 6,2002. A written protest maybe withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of that public hearing. Each written protest shall identiff the business and its address, include a description of the business and the number of employees. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City of Burlingame as the owner of the business, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the business. Any written protest as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which objection is made. 8. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments of the entire District, as to the proposed assessments for 2002-2003, no assessment for 2002-2003 shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are ofrecord written protests by the owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments ofthe entire District only as to an improvement or activityproposed, then that type of improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2002-2003 fiscal year. 9 . Further information regarding the proposed assessments and changes and procedures for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Califomia, phone 650 - 558-7203. The annual report of the Business Improvement District is on file and available at the Office of the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 10. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice ofthe public hearing bypublishing this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Burlingame in accordance with 2 therequirements oftheGovernment and Streets &Highways Codes andmailingthem inaccordance with those requirements as applicable. MAYOR I,ANNT. MUSSO, CityClerkofthe CityofBurlingamedoherebycertiffthatthe foregoing ResolutionwasintroducedataregularmeetingoftheCityCouncilonthe-dayof 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COLINCILMEMBERS: NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK C :\FILES\B IDBRDWY\B DWYINTR2002- 1 A.B ID.wpd J l) EXHIBIT A TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED BY THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS Streetscape Beautification, Seasonal Decorations, and Public Arts Programs a. Seasonal street plantings of flowers. b. Seasonal flags and banners. f. Sidewalk enhancement and maintenance. Business Recruitment and Retention a. Matching funds for storefront improvement incentive b. Develop strategy to fill commercial vacancies. c. Small business assistance workshops. Commercial Marketing, Public Relations, and Advertising a. Organize special events throughout the year. Shuttle Establish a people mover system between the area and the hotel district, to be funded on a cooperative cost sharing basis. C :\FILES\BIDBRDWY\improvmtli s2000.bid.wpd 2) 3) 4) BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT BASIS* BUSINESS TYPE NO. OF STAFF ** ANNUAL ASSESSMENT EXHIBIT B 4+ | -3 $450 $300 3+ 1-2 $2s0 $ls0 3+ | -2 $200 $1s0 NA $s00 * ----- Amount shown is annual total ** --- Staff means any persons working (full time or full time equivalency) including owners, partners, managers, employees, family members, etc. RETAIL & RESTAURANT SERVICE PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL Business Definitions (Burlingame Municipal Code $ 6.52.010) Retail E Businesses that buy and resell goods. Examples are clothing stores, shoe stores, office supplies, etc. tr Selling prepared food and drink.Restaurant Service Professional Financial E Businesses that sell services. Examples are beauty and barber shops, repair shops that do not sell goods, contractors, auto shops, etc. E lncludes engineering firms, architects, attorneys, dentists, optometrists, physicians, realtors, insurance offices, etc. E Banks, savings and loans, household finance companies, etc. C :\FILES\B IDBRDWY\assessbas.bi d.wpd ROLL CALL Present: Staff: Absent: Guests. BURLINGAME BEAUTII'ICATION COMMISSION Mdf2,20!2 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautffication Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Locke. Chairperson Locke, Commissioners Camey, Ellis, Hesselgren, and Lauder Superintendent Richmond and Administrative Secretary Harvey Commissioners McGowan and Webb Residents of the Crossway, Farringdon, Palm Drive neighborhood: Joe Vell4 Adrienne Jones, Ron Biggs, Paul Delucca Chuck Cafiano, and neighborhood spokesman, John Hunter : i MINUTES - The minutes were then approved as submitted; Chairperson Locke abstaining because she was not present at the meeting. CORRESPONDENCE Letter to Eric and Jean Adler, 2111 Easton Drive, informing them that the appeal of the denial to remove a protected Yew tree at their address was denied by the Beautification Commission meeting at the March 7m meeting, because pruning the tree could mitigate their concems. Letter to Angela Petersen of the Califomia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, thanking her for her interesting presentation at the March 7s fubor Day celebration at Washinglon Park. Letter to Tamara Lewis, thanking her for her interesting presentation on Creatine a Wildlife Habitat in the Home Garden. FROM THE FLOOR John Hunter (810 Crossway) and spokesman for his neighborhood, stated the apex at Crossway, Farringdon, and PaIm is an eyesore; firll of weed, 1- 4 shopping a week, clothing, and beer bottles. He added that the neighborhood take turns cleaning up the trash. Residents would like this apex to be converted from an eyesore into a welcoming green zone with the planting of drought resistant plants, a central tree, and some raised paving stones. Adrienne Jones (neighborhood resident) stated that since there is no irrigation at the site, a group of neighborhood residents have agreed to water and maintain the plantings until established. Mr. Hunter concluded that he sent a letter to Superintendent Richmond who then directed him to the Commission for consideration. Chairperson Locke clarified with Mr. Hunter that the "neighborhood" is requesting the "City" construct the project and then the neighborhood would maintain the plantings. Mr. Hunter stated that, that is what the "neighborhood" is proposing. Superintendent Richmond stated that the Assistant Director of Public Works saw no reason to preclude a recommendation by the Beautlfication Commission. Public Works however, does have safety concerns that must be addressed before any recommendation results in a project. Commissioner Hesselgren moved that this item be placed on the June 66 agenda for further consideration and recommendation; seconded (Ellis). Motion carried 5 - 0 - 2 (absent/IVlcGowan and Webb). Chairperson Locke thanked Mr. Hunter and the neighbors and informed them that the item would be placed on the June 6m agenda. She added that any information they wish Commission to have in advance of that meeting, should be sent to the Parks & Recreation Department, (care of the Beautification Commission) by Tuesday, the week before the meeting. 1 OLD BUSINESS SprinrGarden Seminar Review - Commissioner Lauder stated that the information Tamara Lewis presented was excellent and thorough; that, a lot was leamed. Commissioner Ellis agreed and said it was wonderfi.rl. Commissioner Camey added drat she enjoyed the seminar and said that the handouts were helpful. Chairperson Locke stated she was disappointed in the low attendance; around 22. She felt the event had been given good publicity with press releases, flyers, and the hanging of the barurer. She added that not charging for the seminar, and having speakers with no name recognition, could give the perception that it is of no value. However, she concluded that the San Mateo Arboretum seminars only draw an average attendance of arorurd 15. Following a brief discussion, the Commission decided to make no changes because the seminar does provide a service to fte Community. Commissioner Lauder reported that the barurer is old and tom. Commissioner Ellis believed drat it could be repaired. Commissioners Lauder and Ellis will coordinate possible repairs to the banner. REPORTS Richmond - 1) The tree contractor is currently trirnrning the Eucalyptus grove at Ray Park. 2) The Califomia Conservation Corps has been conducting fiail repair, fire brakes, and weed control in Mills Canyon. The Corps will retum later to do confact work for the Fire Department. 3) Boston Ily has been planted along the fence on Califomia Drive at Oak Grove because it will spread quickly and chips are being spread in the comer landscaped area. 4) Safe Tree Program (funded by the shareholders of PG&E) has provided a list of trees suitable to be planted under primary utility lines; the Official Street Tree list will be revised to include some of the flowering and fall color species not already on the list. Hesselsren - Commissioner Hesselgren reported that she has received numerous citizen complaints with regard to the construction staging area on the eastside of CalifomiaDrive, south ofoak Grove. Comments she has received include that a constmction yard should not be located in such a close proximity to a matn downtown area; and that fence could have been higher to hide oversized tmcks and equipment. Locke - 1) Chairperson Locke reported that someone has dumped a microwave oven in the area of Skyline Blvd. and Trousdale Drive. 2) The Golden Chordsmen have cleaned the eastside of El Camino Real, from Murchison Drive to Dufferin Avenue, as part of the CalTrans Adopt-A-Highway program. 3 ) Weeds are growing in some of the tree wells on Califomia Drive where the new trees have been planted. 4) The Pennisetum and the fescue grass recently planted on Broadway looks terrible and needs maintaining. Superintendent Richmond stated he believed that the current contract will include changing some plant material. 5) Reported on an article on how "roundabouts" at intersections can help to slow traffic and reduce accidents by 3 8%. Superintendent Richmond responded that the City Council has been reviewing traffic calming altematives and recommended she contact the Assistant Public Works Director, Frank Erbacher, for further information. Carnev - Commissioner Camey reported that graffitti is on the soundwall on Rollins Road. 2 REPORTS - (Contd.) Lauder - Commissioner Lauder reported that Oleander and 3 Willow trees have been planted at the Broadway/101 triangle; one of the Oleanders has died and the others are in poor health but the Willow ffees are surviving. She has asked Mike Petersen of CalTrans to have someone check the irrigation and has asked when the gazanias and the iceplant will be installed, installation of those plantings was to have occurred last Fall. Chairperson Locke expressed frustration with the lack of follow tkough she and Commissioner Lauder have experienced on this project with CalTrans. Commissioner Lauder commented thatthe fibrous begonias planted at the Burlingame Train Station look great. There being no further business, Chairperson Locke adjoumed the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfirlly submitted, Harvey Recording Secretar_v 3 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA May 13,2002 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran called the May 13,2002, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Browprigg, Keighran, Keele, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner Keylon; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza III.ROTATION OF OTTICERS Chairman Vistica stepped down as chairman of the Planning Commission. He thanked the Planning Commissioners for all their hard work this past year; they made the right decision on a lot of projects. C. Keighran was seated as the new Planning Commission Chair, C. Boju6s was seated as Vice Chair, and C. Osterling was seated as Secretary. IV. MINUTES Chair Keighran noted that on page I 0 of the minutes of the Apirl 22, 2002 meeting, for I128 JuanitaAvenue the vote was 5-0-2,not 7-0. The minutes were approved as corrected. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. VI. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VII. STUDY ITEMS Chair Keighran noted that as part of their job, the Commissioners visit each site before the meeting. 826 ALPINE AVENUE - ZONED R-I - APPLICATION FOR SIDE AND REAR SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND I SEAN CP Monroe presented a srmlmary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: if the garage were detached, does new gym room meet accessory strucfure requirements; besides gym and office, what new uses are proposed for this space; what is the hardship on the property for the setback variances, cannot see hardship; the illegal construction required removing the rearportion ofthe existing garage building, can the addition be reconfigured to eliminate the variance; looks like this area can still become a second unit. There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:76 p.m. \- ) City of Burlingurw Plaming Conlmksion U napfu oued Minutes May 13,2002 329 PRIMROSE ROAD, SUITE 208 - ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A - APPLICATION FOR - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR REAL ESTATE USE (LINDA VRNAK, APPLICANT; G,W. WILLIAMS COMPANY. PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON Planner Keylon presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: what is the projected number of clients in the next2 to 5 years, application does not show increase; applicant should be able have more clients as business grows; what hours is the office expected to be used on the weekends. There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m. 3. ZONING AMENDMENT. RETAIL SALES AND HEALTH SERVICES ON BROADWAY CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: on page 2, can we re-word graphic arts definition to mc ie clearly define "substantial taxable sales", can it be defined as not less than 25o/o of the gross revenue; concerned that allowing health and beauty services above the first floor on Broadway is a change in policy from having the two areas match regulations of the standards on Burlingame Avenue-can we get minutes from the City Council meeting where this issue was discussed. There were no further questions and the item was set for regular action calendar. This item concluded at 7:26 p.m. VIII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Keighran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests- 4a.2303 TROUSDALE DRIVE .ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A PRTVATE NON-PROFIT SCHOOL ON AN EXISTING SCHOOL SITE (ERUDITE-HOPE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, APPLICANT; KASTROP GROUP, INC., ARCHITECT; BI.IRLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKALEWTT 4b.1323 CARLOS A\TENUE . ZONED R-l . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (BRIAN ROCHE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., D.IC., DESIGNER) PROJECT SEAN O'ROURKE 1336 PALOMA AVENUE . ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW SINGLE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - (ALEXANDER HIDCHENKO, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD & ASSOCIATES, 2 4c. 5. City of Burlingame Pktrning Commissian Unapproved Minutes May 13,2002 DF,STGNF,R) PRO]F,CT RUBEN HURIN C. Osterling noted he did not want to call off item 4c but asked for clarification on the garage situation at 1337 Paloma Avenue. CP Monroe explained that a condition has been added that a new garage shall be built with the house. C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. IX. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS AMEND REGULATIONS TO EXTEND TIME FRAME FOR SECOND UNIT AMNESTY PROGRAM PROJECT PI,A MARGARET MONROE Reference staff report,05.l3.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria. Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: would like to see program extended 2 years until2004 C. Vistica moved to recommend to City Council the ordinance extending the second unit amnesty program for two years until 2004 and giving applicants one yetr following the approval to make nay required improvements. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to City Council that second unit amnestyprogram be extended for two years to 2004 andrequiring any improvements within one year. The motion was passed on a 7-0 vote. 6.2304 EASTON DRIYE . ZONED R-I . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS RUFFAT, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; JOSE L, AND MARIA R. REALYVAS QUEZ, PROPERTY OWNERS) r5J NOTTCF,D)PLANNER: CA KEYLON C. Osterling noted that he lived within 500 feet ofthis site and recused himself. He stepped down from the dias. Reference staffreport, 05.13.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and Staff comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. John Stewart, architect, and Lou Realyvasquez, property owner, were available for questions. Commission asked if the roofpitch was the same, it just continues up. John 3 \- City of Burlingarne Planning Commrssion U napprov ed Miruttes May 13,2N2 Stewart noted yes, that at the front there is still a flat roof at the rear of the house. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Boju6s noted that the applicant had addressed the design issues discussed by the Commission. The design is good and fits in the neighborhood, so he moved to approve the application, byresolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped April 26,2002, Sheets A1 through A7, site plan, floor plans and building elevations; z)thatanychanges to the size or envelope ofthe basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alterationprojects to submit aWasteReductionPlanandmeetrecyclingrequirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 4) thatthe conditions of the Recycling Specialist's March 20, 2002 and the City Engineer's and Chief Building Official's March 25,2002 memos shall be met; and 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: applicant made suggested changes; design has improved; commend architect for work on this project. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 vote (C. Osterling abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m. C. Osterling took his seat on the dias. 1310 BAYSWATER AVENUE - ZONED C-l . APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATTVE DECLARATION, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CHURCH FACILITY (ST. CATHERINE OF SIENNA CHURCH, APPLICANT; KODAMA DISENO ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT; ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO, PROPERTY OWNER) (125 NOTICED) PRO.TECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON Reference staff report ,05 .L3 .}z,with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria and Staff comments. Twenty-one ccinditions were suggested for consideration. Staff noted that a condition has been added requiring the church to have valet service for large church functions, they have also arranged to use parking on nearby properties. Commission asked for clarification on FAR calculations for areas in the building with l2-foot height or greater, is all of the FAR area counted toward the parking requirement, should financial limitations be considered for variance findings, and could a conditions be added that the parking will be evaluated on an arurual basis. Staff explained that areas over 12 feetin height are counted as a two floors for FAR calculations, but only the first floor is count'ed toward the parking requirement. Financial limitations should not be considered in making findings for a variance. Staff stated that a condition can be added regarding annual parking evaluation, it works best if it is reviewed - each year for a designated time like 5 years and upon complaint. 7 4 City of Burlingwne Ploming Commission U nappr oved Minutes May |j,2002 Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. MaitzaDegadillo ofKodama Diseno Architects represented the project. She explained that the at the last meeting the Commission had expressed concern over the parking situation and asked them to look at a two-story option for the parish hall. They have submitted a response packet to address the Commission's comments, which all the Commissioners have in their staffreport. Have addressed parking concern with valet service that would accommodate 90 cars off-site. Met with design reviewer, Jerry Winges, and went over two-story options. Design reviewer made a positive recommendation based on the one-story option and has suggested some design changes, which have been made and are on the plans before the Commission. Jim Veehill, civil engineer working on lot merger, was available for questions. Commission asked: design reviewer noted that original roof design has various slopes, why; new northeast wall on parish hall in courtyard area between the church and parish hall shows greenscreen or lattice gttds on landscape plan, but this wall does not seem appropriate for landscaping, could be a good dodge ball wall, landscaping would not survive here; please clarify why two-story alternative would not work; would two- story option encroach as much into usable parking lot; does the school have safety guards around the exterior of the school, the Primrose and Park intersections, as well as on-site; is the new fence shown on the landscape plan wrought iron; has the opening between the comer of the parish hall and the adjacent apartment building been reviewed for appropriate exit width, seems very tight. The project architect responded and explained that the roof slopes were originally designed to address drainage, but have been changed per the design reviewer's recommendation; they are not opposed to removing the landscaping and greenscreen from the northeast wall, they were responding to design reviewer's comment to visually soften the area with landscaping; a two-story structure would require the parking layout to be reconfigured and they would only gain three or four parking spaces, would not gain a whole aisle of parking due the large footprint required for a two-story structure to accommodate two stairwells and elevator; there are safety guards that are on the school site, and Sister Theresa will work with the parents on new drop-off and pick-up procedures, usually takes about four weeks to train everyone; the separation between the parish hall and adjacent apartment building was reviewed with the Fire Marshal early on in the processing of this project, and it meets the required existing width. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: excellent job responding to the Commission's concems; would like to add a condition that the applicant will provide a construction employee parking plan along with a construction delivery schedule and safety precautions during construction; would like to add another condition that one year after the completion ofthe project, and every subsequent year for five years, the parking plan and drop- off, pick-up circulation shall be reviewed, and will always be review on a complaint basis; what is history of public parking lot G, how did the City obtain this lot from St. Catherine's. Staff noted that in the 1960's assessment district for parking used revenues to buy public parking lots; part of the was purchasing the church site; troubled by loss of parking caused by this project; once building is constructed there is no remedy; design element is nice; looking to the church to enforce conditions; there is no going back once this building is constructed; history of this project is unique, could have had parking on adjacent lot that City bought for the beneficial use of the community; this is a highly developed urban area. C. Keele citing comments made to support the mitigated negative declaration, the conditional use permit and the parking variance, moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended 5 City of Burlingame Plaming C unmission U ruppr ov ed Miruttes May 13,2002 conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departmen - date stamped May 3,2002, siteplan, floorplan, roofplan, elevations, tentative and final parcel map, sheets A0.1 through A4.0, sheet 1 and sheet, figure 6, and landscape plan, sheet Ll.O;2)that the church shall require valet parking on-site for large groups using the church facilities outside ofschool hotrs or in special circumstances during the school day and the church shall maintain cooperative agreements for joint use of available off-site parking lots nearby to alleviate the on-street parking demand created by single large events or overlapping large events using the church facilities; failure to maintain the valet parking opporlunity shall be cause for the conditional use and parking variance to be reviewed by the Planning Commission; 3) that one year after the completion of the project(2003) and every subsequent year for five years (2008), and./or anytime upon complaint, the applicant shall submit a parking and circulation status report to the Planning Department for evaluation; 4) that ifthe applicant wishes the greenscreen shown on page L1.0 on the plans date stamped May 3,2002, proposed for the northeast elevation, shall be eliminated and the area converted to usable play area for the students at the school; 5) that any changes to the size or envelope of building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 6)that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 14,2001 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 6, 2001memo, the Chief Building Official's August 27 ,2}}lmemo and the Recycling Specialist's August 29, 2001memo shall be met; 7) that an application for a parcel map to merge the four lots shall be processed and granted before the foundation inspection is scheduled; 8) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 9) that the applicant shall provide to the City a construction employee parking plan, construction delivery and staging plan, and a safety plan demonstrating what safety measures will be -implemented to ensure the children's safety on-site during the construction of the parish hall; a building permit shall not be issued until the proposed plans have been approved by the City Engineer;lO) that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System OfPDES) standards; off-site runoff shall be diverted around the construction site and all on-site runoff shall be diverted around exposed construction areas;1 l) that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or kaps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, straw bale dikes, check dams storm drain inlet protection soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment controls continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established;12)that all constrdCtion materials and waste, including solid wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediment, shall be stored, handled and disposed of properly to prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants into stormwater; 13) that no vehicles or equipment (construction) shall be cleaned, fueled or maintained on-site, except in designated areas where runoff is contained and treated;14) that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 15) that if construction is done during the wet season (October 15 through April 15), prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment controls prior to, during, and immediately after each storm event; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or pernanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals;1 6) that trash receptacles shall be placed throughout the common pedestrian circulation ^areas and shall be regularly emptied; 17) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that, if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self- 6 City of Bwlingame Plarning Commrssion U nappr ov ed Mirwtes Ma1 13,2002 contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor;lS) that the site shall be sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliancewiththe standards ofthe SanFrancisco BayAreaAirQualityManagement District; 19)that St. Catherine of Siena School shall compile a set ofguidelines to distribute to all parents with clear and detailed instruction as to the new drop-off and pick-up conf,rguration. The following criteria shall be included as part of the guidelines: 1) that each parent shall be required to stay with his/her vehicle during the drop-off and pick-up process and shall not leave their vehicle unattended in the playground area; and2) that all vehicles shall enter the school drop-off and pick-area from Park Road and shall exit onto Primrose Road, with all vehicles in the left lane making a left turn only onto Primrose Road, heading southbound on Primrose Road and all vehicles in the right lane making a right tum only onto Primrose Road heading northbound;20)thatSt. Catherine of Siena school shall provide teachers, staff and/orvolunteers to monitor the morning drop-off and escort the children to the appropriate vehicles for pick-up in the afternoons to ensure that children are safely making their way to and from the vehicles and keep the flow of traffic going through this area; 2l) that all construction shall be required to be done in accordance with the limits to hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipa' Ccde; 22) that the existing water meter in the proposed driveway on Park Road shall be relocated to outside of the driveway approach in the public right-of-way;23)thatthe project shall complywith CityofBurlingame's exterior illumination Ordinance 1477; and24) that if any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all work will be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts selected bythe City, can be implemented. The motion was seconded by C. Boju6s. Comment on the motion: do not support the parking variance based on finding that church land is now being used for City parking lot, community use, do not owe a parking variance because City has parking lot that was once church parking; church must continue with cooperation on valet parking; church should consider assigning a parking coordinator to monitor this process; beautiful project, it is unfortunate that parking is being lost as a result; could have a two-story option, but would not generate good architecture; parish hall has good vocabulary, nicely executed with the existing church structure; project is benefit to the community; applicant has cooperated with the City and will continue to work with the City to make things work with (valet) parking; church needs to make sure there is someone to oversee construction on-site; are there NPDES measures incorporated into this project. CE Murtuza explained to the Commission that in general it is common to have a construction manager on the job site; this personwill submit constructionplans to thePublic Works Departrnent; that includes access routes and anticipated encroachments onto public property. Public Works can require that a construction manager is available on-site throughout the construction process and that this person's phone number is available to anyone affect through CityHall. General practice also includes the contractor fencing off the main construction areas, and using measures to keep any stormwater run-off from flowing off-site onto other properties and other areas of the church site as required by NPDES. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve The motion passed on a J -0 vote. App eal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:25 p.m. 1I \- City of Burlingmne Plmning Curtmission Unapprooed Minutes May 13,2002 A. TENTATIYE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT MERGER Chair Keighran noted that the action on this item is a recommendation to City Council. C. Vistica made a motion to recommend approval of this tentative and final parcel map for a lot merger at the St. Catherine of Siena site at 1310 Bayswater Avenue, with the conditions found in the April 30, 2002, memo from the Engineering Division. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the tentative and final map to City Council. The motion passed on a7-0 vote. This item concluded at 8:27 p.m. 1409 ROLLINS ROAD . ZONED M.l . APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXTEND THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND EXPAND RENTAL FLEET FOR AN EXISTING AUTO RENTAL BUSINESS (XABIER BERRT]ETA, ENTRPRTSE RENT-A-CAR, APPLICANT; HONERLAN TRLII-,T, PROPERTY OPWNER) (23 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINEKEYLON Reference staff report ,05 .13 .02, with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria and Staff comments. Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked for clarification on the fleet numbers since previous approval noted 50-1 5 vehicles on-site; is this proposal for 30 additional vehicles? Staff explained that this permit will replace previous permit, this proposal is for a total of 60 fleet vehicle on-site plus employee and customer vehicles on-site. As part of employee benefits, 6 of the 8 employees on-site go to and from work in fleet vehicles. Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Xabier Berreuta, regional manger and applicant for Enterprise Rent-a-Car, was available to answer questions. Commission asked if cars are washed on-site. Applicant stated that no, the cars are driven to two local carwashes, one on Broadway the other on North Carolan. Commission noted that although the applicant has stated that they are going to have landscaping maintained on a weekly basis, they currently are doing business at the site, and the landscaping is unkempt. Applicant stated that they know that the weeds were really overgrown on the Carolan side ofthe property and recently had them removed. Commission rcJornmend that theynot use sod on the site on Rollins Road, but instead plant small-scale shrubs, they are easier to maintain and look nicer, add color. Commission suggested that a condition be added to require maintenance of landscaping, that if a car wash area is ever added that an oiVsand separator shall be required and that all loading and unloading ofvehicles shall be done on-site and there shall be no loading or un-loading of vehicles within the public right-of-way. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Osterling moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: l)that the project shall be built and the site shall be configured as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped May 3, 2002, site plan and floor plan;2) that the existing 1,830 SF of landscaping on-site (5.5%) shall be retained, automatic irrigation shall be installed and it shall be maintained by the tenant regularly on a weekly basis; 3) that the car rental business shall have regular business hours from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., closed on Sunday; 4) thatthe car rental fleet operated from this site shall be limed to a maximum of - 60 vehicles; all fleet vehicles, employee and customers shall park on-site at1409 Rollins Road; there shall 8. 8 x" 9. City of Burlingane Planning Cunmissiut U nappr ort ed Mirwtes May 13,2002 be no parking of fleet vehicles along Rollins Road orNorth Carolan; 5) that no off-loading or on-loading of vehicles from trucks shall take place on the public street or on any public right-of-way; 6) that the applicant shall stripe the parking area on-site to accommodate aIl60 rental fleet vehicles as well as the 9 required parking spaces for the office and customer parking; and no employee or fleet vehicles shall ever be parked on the public right-of-way or across the public sidewalks; 7) thatthere shall be no maintenance or washing of vehicles on the site unless approved by the City Engineer; 8) that any on-site car-washing facility approved in the future by the City Engineer shall be equipped with a sand/oil separator; and shall not encroach upon the on-site storage area for the 60 fleet vehicles or employee or visitor/customer parking, or required landscaping or on on-site area used for loading or off-loading rental vehicles; 9) that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 10) that the conditiols- of the City Engineer's memo of February 11,2002 shall be met; and 1 1) that crushed aggregatebetween 3/8" and 3/c" shallbe laid over the existing dirt/gravel area at the rear ofthe lot to address NPDES concerns and to allow stormwater filtration.The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a7 -0 vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:38 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 705 BURLINGAME AVENUE . ZONED R.l . APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION EUGENE A. BORDEGARAY SR., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; EUGENE JR. AND LORRAINEBORDEGARAY, PROPERTY OWNERS) ( 64NOTTCED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON Planner Keylon brieflypresented the project description. Commission asked if the rear yard trellis counted toward the overall FAR, and asked why the applicant did not submit a fulI floor plan. Staffstated that the trellis count toward both lot coverage and FAR, and that the proposed project only changes the area shown and that the rest of the floor area not shown will remain unchanged. Chair Keiglran opened the pu ,'!i : comment. Eugene Bordegaragy Sr., project applicant, was available to answer any questions. He explained that this property is owned by his son and daughter-in-law. Commission noted that on the top floor there is an area called out with "new rock" fascia and asked how the material is applied. Applicant stated that it is a manufactured stone that is applied to the stucco surface. Commission asked if the applicant was set on applyrng this fascia or would they consider removing it. The applicant stated that they would not be opposed to removing it from the top floor. Commission noted that the stone fascia is also along the bottom and doesn't seem to blend well with the new stone all the way at the top of the house. Applicant noted they had considered adding stone around the front door, that would tie to the stone on the second floor. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: all the massing is articulated; nothing has big plane; a lot of time was taken to design this addition, nice job; design has a homegrown quality; stone work on top floor enhances home craft feel, but it is o.k. either with or without it; stone appears to stand out too much and becomes focal point, should eliminate; nicely landscaped project; either add more stone to connect the bottom obscure 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission U napprou ed Minutes Ma1 13,2002 stone fascia to the new stone fascia proposed on the top level or do away with it completely; add wrough, 1 iron work that is found on the first floor front fagade to the second floor to tie them together. Chair Keiglrran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on motion: nice job overall; no consensus on the Commission regarding the stone fascia, it is up to the applicant to work out; if stone work is retained, there should be more stone work added around the door to pick up the stone work on the new addition above. Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:54 p.m. IA.282I TIBURON WAY ZONED R.l APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEV/, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; GEORGE TAN, PROPERTY OWNER) (39 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT Planner Keylon briefly presented the project description. Staffnoted that a memo dated May 7,2002,was submitted by John Stewart, project architect, stating that to address view concems of the neighbors they will -reduce the plate height from 9'6" to 8'6", and the overall height will be reduced by 2 feetby adding a flat area to the top of the roof. He submitted a rendering showing these changes. There were two letter in opposition received after the preparation of the staff report. Chair Keighran opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, presented the project. He noted that the project was originally designed with the garage on the left, but the redesigned to tuck the garage back into the hill, they are trying to be sensitive to the neighbor's view. Since the May 7,2002 memo was submitted to the Commission, they met again with the neighbors and have made some more changes to the"" ' plans. In order to reduce the height ofthe new house to a height not taller than the existing ridge height, the ' plate height will be lowered to 8 feet. They also suggested having a surveyor hired to shoot the floor elevations before the framing inspection to give the neighbor's reassurance that they will not exceed the height limit. Also plan on giving neighbors color samples to insure that they will not be using a reflective roofing color. Architect also suggested putting up story poles. Homeowneq Mrs. Tan, put notices regarding the project in her neighbor's mailboxes, but the neighbor to the right was the only one who asked to meet. VivianLee,2SS4ArgaelloDrive,AnnMarieUmland,1600SebastianDrive,DanSu,2830ArguelloDrive, John Roman,2839 Arguello Drive, and Lauren Wells 2818 Arguello Drive spoke with concerns about the project. Would like written guarantee from owners that grading for the project will have no effect on their property for l0 years; how can this work be engineered; this is abig dig into the mountain; soil in this area has a lot of movement subsurface creeks; the proposed house has a different character than the rest of the neighborhood; will this addition divert water onto other adjacent properties, what are the ramifications of the project; new bedroom will be next to existing bedroom on adjacent property, privacy will be lost, can a 10 Ci4 of Burlmgarne Plorrning Cunmission Unapprwed Mirwtes May 13,2402 larger fence be built; can the project be scaled back , take neighbors concerns into consideration; need soils report and storypoles; concemed with loss of view, noise, extra cars and possible second units. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Visitica stated that the architect understands the concerns stated and made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked: o entry shown on rendering has a heavy shadow line over the door, makes entry a predominant feature, entry is grandiose, shape of entry is not consistent with the neighborhood; need to scale back; . fullbathroom on bottom floor next to bedroom with direct exterior access appears to be a possible second unit; guest room on lower level o.k., should be adjusted so can not be a second unit, remove exterior door, reduce size of bathroom (no shower); o make sure that the lights shown at the front are not too bright and stand out; . applicant needs to address geologic survey/soils concerns; . overall appreciate the architect taking the garage out of the front element; . need to see revised drawings that reflect the changes that were discussed; and . before action meeting erect story poles with netting in between, story poles should reflect modified design. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on motion: public comments well taken, but the architect did a good job on keeping the height down; project is below allowable FAR, this is not a monster house. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at9:22p.m. 11.1128 CAMBRIDGE ROAD ZONED R.I APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR IIEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (GREG AND TRICIA- HAGEY, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; GREG HAGEY, ARCHITE CT) (67 NOTICED) PRO]ECT PT,A RI]BEN HIIRTN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commission asked what is the size of the window exception allowed to encroach into the declining height envelope. Staffexplained that the Code allows a window enclosure that creates no more than 35 SF of floor area within the structure. Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Greg Hagey, property owner and architect, was present to answer questions. He explained that he and his wife came up with a complex roof design for this acldition to do awaywith the boxy look ofmany additions on other houses in the neighborhood. Wanted to include a lot of variation and have tested roof design and know that it will work. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission comments: great improvement to the neighborhood; charming addition; articulation is found on all elevations. \- 11 City of Burlingame Plarming Commission U rwppr w, ed Minutes May lj,2002 C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked: o need to check with Staff to make sure that the window enclosure on the left side does not exceed 35 SF; . concem with roof height compared to adjacent structures, may be out of place; scale down; o concemed with compatibility of top floor; o look at height; can get design you want within 30 foot height limit; . make sure that the roof structure can be built as shown; o need to see roof pitches on revised drawings; look at reducing pitch; special permit for height is used to enhance architectural style, see if some height can be reduced; This motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on motion: nice design, project is on the right track; mass and bulk o.k., wayunder FAR; sharp pitch does not have much bulk, won't feel as tall as it looks. Chair Keigluan called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a roll call vote 6-l (C. Keele dissenting). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:36 p.m. t2 l2O4 CABRILLO AVENUE ZONED R-l APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL - PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT EI{VELOPE FOR A NEW, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TOM BAZZONE APPLICANT; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER; MII(E MLSON, PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:THERINE KEYLON CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Staff noted that there was a one letter in support and one letter in opposition at the Commissioner's desks received after the preparation of the staff report. Commissioners asked the CA Anderson the following: clarify how this is, a new application; is this processing setting a precedent, doesn't builder have to bear some ofthe burden for the unpermitted changes and what options for action are available to the Planning Commission; does the Planning Commission have authority to suggest removal of a red tag; who is the owner of the property and can the owner pull permits or does it have to be a licensed contractor; can the original project be built as approved last year. CA Anderson advised the Plaruring Commission to look at the entire house as a new application, not the changes from the original approval, will this design fit in with the neighborhood, what is best for the neighborhood; what was built without permit does not exist as far as the City is concerned; red tag has stopped work on the site for a few months now and is a significant impact on the builder; building permit penalties will be assessed on the new submittal for additional plan check; comments the Commission makes on the request to continue work on the site will be passed along the Building Official who issues the red tags; and the person who took out this permit was a licensed contractor; old application that was approved still entitles the applicant to build the old project but they are proposing something different tonight. Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Michael Kaindl, Chu Design & Engineering, 39 W. 43'd Avenue, San Mateo, presented the project. He gave a packet to the Planning Commission including a IZ City of Burlingame Planning Cornmission UruppovedMirurtes May 13,2002 rendering of the proposed house, photos of the existing conditions,4 pages including 13 signatures of neighbors in support ofthe project. The property is in escrow to a new buyer but can not close escrow because ofthe red tag. Second floor interior finish is done, need to do first floor finish now, can't because of red tag. New design includes abellyband, oval window in the laundry room, arched entry, omamental planters, shutters with working hardware, and a new side gate. The roofwill also be lowered below the 30 foot height limit. The neighbor on the comer that would be most affected by the declining height envelope encroachment on the right side has no problem with the project, declining height exception. The left side of the house is totallywithin the declining height envelope. The second exhibit was passed up to the Planning Commissioners which shows a diagram of the house with the reduced second floorplate height, plate height varies to under 5 feet. This would result in a loss of 187 SF of living space verses 150 SF of voided area. Reducing the plate height requires demolition ofthe roof struchre, and would require expensive demolition to the project, the second floor finished interiorwould need to be protected, and bedroom number 2 would be reduced by 30%. The landscape plan has been redone with a specimen tree added along the right side. The dormers have been changed from hip to gable, design is articulated. Actual usable space in this house is 2,800 SF (84%) where the Code calculations come up_ wrjh 3,413 SF cf floor area. Reducing the plate height would require very careful dismantling and would take 4 months. Commission asked the actual height of the structure and the separation between the roofridges on the right side; the applicant stated that it is 2'8" above the height limit, 32'8"; and that there is about a 4' setback total for the 3 roof ridges on the right side. Bill Tatum , 1205 Cortez Avenue, Pat Harding 1205 Cortez Avenue, Nancy Kux, I 208 Cortez Avenue, and Betty Blumer, 1702 Broadway spoke in opposition to the project. They had the following comments and concerns: original plate height was suppose to be 2'6" lower, now taller causing loss of light and privacyto homes and backyards; looking at project as new application is against the purpose of the planning Commission; what is cost to lift, excavate and rebuild the foundation; if project is approved as currently presented it will be rewarding applicant for circumventing the rules; height is a concern; house should be built as originally approved; the neighbors have been intimidated by the people involved in this process, so neighbors do not want to show up at the public hearings; had a garage, small projects whichhad to go through the entire Planning process and comply, not fair to let this large project go on through without complying; don't want,lo give message that it is easier for the applicant to come ask the Commission for forgiveness than it is to ask forpermission; there have been too manyvi-.ii:lions on this project. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The commission had the following comments and concerns with the project: o should be no voided areas on the second floor, should be counted toward FAR or eliminated; concerned with precedent; there can be frrture expansion of living space in these areas; pull in exterior walls where there is dead space; o need more contextual information, footprint and height of adjacent skuctures and how this structure will fit in; provide elevations showing adjacent structures to see how they are affected; o front elevations does not blend in with itself; roof pitch should be lowered; o FAR is only 7 SF under maximum allowed; o look at elevations, massive and bulky; o special permit for declining height envelope is usually granted to enhance design, this declining height envelope does not enhance the design, eliminate the speciar permit; o rear elevation looks like it has a tower that is separate for the rest of the house, should blend; \- 13 \- City of Burlingame Plaming Cornmission U napprooed Minutes May 13,2002 o look at design review guidelines, mass and bulk of this structure is too large, needs to comply; . if voided areas are retained, the interior wall should be a shear wall to prevent the area from being opened up and used as livable floor area; . roof over entry is awkward, roof line could tie in with bedroom on the right side; . bay window on the left side needs more detailing perhaps a cooper roof; o dormers on the right side should be similar; and o service door should have a vent or louver. Chair Keighran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Boju6s. Comment on motion: project architect has a lot of experience and understands how to revise the project incorporating the above comments; may help to have a third parfy looking this project; design reviewer will be put in an awkward position since it is impossible not to be in conflict with the cost involved with the changes; there is a lot ofwork to be done regarding mass and bulk; mayhelp to send to design reviewer and will save time in the long run. XI. PLANNERREPORTS CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the City Council at their May 6, 2002, meeting. She noted that they directed the staff and commission to undertake a review and update of the Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan as well as approving the consultant contract for preparation of the North End Specific Area Plan. Planning Commission subcommittee appointments CP Monroe noted that the work program for the coming year indicated that the Commission would need four working subcommittees. Chair Keighran suggested assignments and asked the commissioners to consider them and tabled the appointrnents to the next Planning Commission meeting. FYI Minor changes to an approved design review project at 1404 Hillside Circle. Planning Commissioners noted that they had looked over the changes proposed, they seemed consistent with the approved design and no further action was required. Next steps in review of 1450 Howard Avenue t4 Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to refer this project to a design review consultant with the direction given by the Planning Commission. The motion passed on a roll call vote 5-2-0 (Cesrs. Keele and Osterling dissenting). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:36 p.m. -\ Review of City Council regular meeting of May 6,2002. City of Burlingame Planting Commission U nappr ou e d Minutes Ma1 13,2002 CP Monroe reminded the Planning Commission of the Special Study meeting scheduied for the Safewayproject at 1450 Howard Avenue on May 23,2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lane Community Room at the Library. She noted that the Commission agenda for the regular meeting on June l0 was already filling, and that it might be preferable to set the public hearing on the environmental document and project for a special meeting. Commission discussed this and determined that they would all be available on Thursday, June 20, 2002, for the hearing. CP Monroe said she would schedule and advertise the meeting accordingly. XII. ADJOURNMENT Chair Keighran adjoumed the meeting at 1l:05 p'm. Respectfully submitted, 'l! Ralph Osterling, Secretary TINAPPROVEDMINUTESs. I 3 trtrlt 15 CITY OF BARLINGAME TEIS !,IONTB MONTIILY PERMIT ACTIVITY APRIL 2002 BUII-DING INSPECTION LAST YEAR TO DATE FISCAIJ YIAR TO DATE TEIE YE.T,R -. TO DATE # galuatioD 3 $1, 1oO , ooo 0 $0 3 $148,000 113 $4 t 288 ,460 29 l!2 ,468 ,59L 1s $19, s00 4 $71,000 10 $26,000 0 s0 68 191"2,657 L7 $73, 1s0 23 $1,20 t 844 27 $893, s28 , SAIi{E MONTH LAST YEAR PermL! ltDe New Single Family New Multi-Family New Cornmercial Alt.erations -Res Alterat ions -NonRes Demolition swirruning Pool Sigrr Permit.g Fences Reroofing Repairs window Repl Miscellaneous valuat,ioa $300,000 $o $100,000 $693,145 $5ss, o0o $o $25,000 $2,800 $o s3 08,6s5 $17,100 $38, 837 9228 , 8],0 ValuaElo! $o $o $800, 0oo $1,100,3s0 $1,101,500 $74, ooo $o $6, eoo $o 9280 ,462 $195,000 $48 ,644 $8s,500 VaIuatIo! $947 , lso $o $2,88s,000 i3 t770,167 $3,798,7s0 $111,s00 $22 t s3S $3s,1s3 $o $741,701 $2s5,500 $155, 984 $6Is,471 valuatio! $3,710,000 $o $10,248,000 59 ,887 t 269 $17,383,499 $s8, so0 $93,000 $66 , 82s $6,700 s2 ,38s , 644 i9L ,25O $352,705 $1, s04, 757 # 1 0 1 24 8 3 1 0 23 4 3 _ I.A8T MOI{TE * valuatlo! 2 $800,000 0 $0 0 $0 30 $903,454 7 $393,635 4 $7, soo 1 $18,500 4 $15, 900 0 $0 t2 $160,233 3 $11,s00 4 l22 t 9t1 7 s98,080 # 0 0 1 23 5 6 0 , 0 19 5 5 9 * 3 0 3 9r 14 1 10 0 61 15 19 40 # 11 0 7 253 59 42 5 r97 25 53 69 TOTAIJS......77 52,370,348 74 i2,43t,130 1s $3,693,455 312 i20,t21,730 288 $13,351,014 143 945,7AA,]-49 4/30/02 15:3 9:41 I CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30,2002 Par Market Value Book Value '/a ol Portfolio Term Days to Maturlty 360 Equlv. YTM 365 Equiv. YTMlnvestmentsValue LAIF & County Pool CORP NOTES Federal Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 19,971,822.11 3,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 19,971,822.11 3,072,500.00 13,176,250.00 19,971,822.11 3,027,780.00 13,000,000.00 55.48 8.41 36.11 1 1,596 1,700 1 456 1,221 3.091 5.929 5.354 3.1 34 6.011 5.428 35,971,822.11 36,220,572.11 35,999,602.,t1 100.00%749 480 4.147 4.204 Total Earnlngs April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CurrentYear 119,810.01 Average Daily Balance 32,629,219J14 Effective Rate of Return 4.47o/o Pursuant to State law, there are sufftcient available funds to meet Burlingame,s 1,428,797.57 34,5',|1,582.41 4.97Yc expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and is restricted by law (e.9. Gas DIR./TREASURER Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital f-/3-o>-- Projects, and Enterprise funds). RAHN A. Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRLPMl ) SymRept V5.02f Run Oate: 05/1012002 - 08:35 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Average Balance GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments April 30,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Stated Book Valuo Rate Moody'sMarket Value YTM Days to 365 Maturlty Page 2 Maturity Date LAIF & County Pool 77 79 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. S M COUNW POOL Subtotal and Average 10,980,837.40 8,990,984.71 10,980,837.40 8,990,984.71 10,980,837.40 8,990,984.71 2.760 3.590 2.760 3.590 18,601,499.{4 19,571,822.11 19,971,8zni1 15,571,822.11 3.134 CORP NOTES 0739028M9 37042R2C5 4E7 €9 BEAR STEARNS CORP GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP Subtotal and Average 03/0?J19s9 04/2011999 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,067,500.00 1,005,000.00 1,997,500.00 1,030,2E0.00 6.150 6.750 6.1 79 5.685 671 03t0212004 40 0ahot2002 3,027,780.00 3,000,000,00 3,072,5{)0.00 3,027,780,00 6.011 456 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 3 l 331 LKK3 3l33MSTS4 3133M7Y75 3133MF2D9 3133MLMH5 3136F0Y29 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FANNIE MAE Subtotal and Average 499 476 4EE 49E 50s 502 06t13t2001 03l/17/1998 o3122'.!999 05/24t2001 o2t26t2002 o8t28t2001 2,000,000.00 '1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,008,740.00 1,029,370.00 2,093,120.00 2,004,380.00 2,006,880.00 4,033,760.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5.800 6.020 6.000 5.630 4.000 5.420 5.800 6.020 6.000 5.630 4.0O2 5.420 '1,504 320 691 1,484 940 1,580 06/13ii2006 0311712003 03t22t2004 05124t2006 1112612004 0812812006 13,000,000.00 13,000,000,00 13,178,250.00 13,000,000.00 5.428 1,21 Total lnvostments and Average 32,625,275.14 35,971,822,11 s8,220,572.11 35,999,602.1 {4,204 tl80 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PMz) SymRept V5.02f Run Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35 1 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnvestment Activity By Type April 1,2002 through April 30,2002 Page 3 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Beglnnlng Balance Stated Rate Transactlon Datc Purchases or Deposlts Sales/Maturities or Wlthdrawals Endlng Balance LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary) 77 LOCALAGENCY INV.FD. 79 SMCOUNWPOOL Subtotal 2.760 3.590 3,564,836.07 1,829,031.28 0.00 0.00 14,577,5v.76 5,393,867.35 0.00 15,971,822.11 CORP NOTES Subtotal 3,027,780,00 3,027,780.00 Federal Agency lssues . Coupon Subtotal 13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 Total 30,605,734.70 5,393,867.35 0,00 35,9S9,602.1 1 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02f / Run Oate: 05/10i2002 - 08:35 GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnvestment Activity Summary April 2001 through April 2002 Yield to Maturlty Page 4 Month Number of Securltles Total lnvasted 300 Equlvalent Equlvalent Number of Securltles Purchaced Number of SecuriUes Matured / Sold Average Torm Average OaW to Maturlty Managed Pool305EndYearRate April May June July August September October November December January February March Aprll 2001 2001 200'l 2001 2001 200't 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 14 14 13 15 14 15 12 12 12 11 11 10 10 37,255,372.54 38,758,088.25 36,085,177.06 38,447,819.42 38,002,167.'.t2 34,930,381.22 32,614,594.78 33,056,179.95 35,671,743.12 34,732,791.56 32,802,148.94 30,605,734.76 35,999,602.11 5.737 5.609 5,431 5.396 5.287 s.352 4.880 4.812 4.629 4.497 4.441 4.419 4.'.t47 5.817 5.687 5.507 5.471 5.361 5.426 4.948 4.879 4.694 4.559 4.503 4.480 4.204 5.417 5.200 4.767 4,632 4.4U 4.214 3.809 3.683 3.474 3.232 3.237 3.317 3.134 931 948 989 1,047 1,089 1,289 1,028 1,014 940 928 933 880 749 1 1 1 2 1 ,| 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 671 695 764 817 860 1,020 791 763 691 662 658 580 480 Average 13 35,304,753.99 4.972%5.04',t%4.046 11 982 727 Portfolio GITY CP PM (PRF_PM4) SymRspt V5.04 turn Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35 GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Distribution of lnvestments By Type April 2001 through April 2002 Page 5 Aprll May 2001 2001 June 2001 2001 AprllJulyAugust Soptembor2001 2o0l October November December2001 2001 2001 January February2002 2002 March 2002 2002 Average by Perlodlnvestment Type LAIF & Gounty Pool 42.4 41.9 40.4 36.2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 45.0 47.6 55.5 425% Gertificates of Deposit . Bank Certificates of Deposit - S & L Gertificates of &Ln Negotlable CD's - Bank CORP NOTES 8.1 7.8 8.4 7.9 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 9.9 8.4 8.6% Bankers Acceptances Gommerclal Paper - lnterest Bearing Commerclal Paper -Discount Federal Agency lssues .Coupon 49.5 50.3 51.3 55.9 53,9 64.4 49.1 48,4 44.9 43.2 45.7 42.5 36.1 48.90/" Federal Agency lssues - Dlscount Treasury Securlties .Coupon Treasury Securities - Discount Miscellaneous Securities -Coupon Miscellaneous Securities . Discount Non lnterest Bearing lnvestments Morlgage Backed Securities Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 2 Mlscellaneous Discounts -At Gost 3 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM5) SymRept V5.02f Run Oate:05/10/2002 - 08:35 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management lnterest Earnings Summary April30,2002 April 30 Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date Page 6 GD/Goupon/Dlscount lnvestments: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period lnterest Earned during Period Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Eamings during Period 33,750.00 192,098.33 151 ,173.33) 0.00) ( 1,116,900.00 192,098.33 337,083.33) 0.00) 74,675.00 0.00 971 ,915.00 1,250.00 74,675.00 973,165.00 Pass Through Securlties: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period lnterest Eamed during Period Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Earnings during Period 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Gash/Checking Accounts: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period lnterest Earned during Period 12s,892.95 3't3,812.44 394,570.38) 567,540.24 313,812.44 425,720,11) 45,135.0'l 455,632.57 Tota! Interest Earned durlng Period Total Gapltal Galns or Losses 119,810.01 0.00 1,427,ill.57 1,250.00 Run Date:05/10/2002 - 08:35 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM6) SymRept V5.02f Total Earnlngs durlng Perlod 119,810.01 1,428,797,57 ( (( ( ( ( ( (( ! I lnvestments 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary Apri!30,2002 Par Market Value Book Value t/t ol Portfollo Term Da]6 to Maturlty YTM 360 Equlv, YTM 365 Egulv.Value Federal Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 100.00 502 4.995 5.064 800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 502 4.995 5.064 Total Earnlngs April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available 3,416.67 802,000.00 5.18% funds to meet Burlingame's 34,166.67 802,000.00 5.',|2c/o expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax,Trust & Agency funds, Capital r-,3 aL Projects, and Enterprise funds). Rahn Becker, Finance Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PMI) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 05/10/2002 . 08:36 1,756 CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer Average Balance 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments April30,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated BookValue Rate YTM Days to 365 Maturlty Page 2 Maturlty Date LAF 79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD. Subtotal and Average 5.707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 3133M5Q89 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal and Average 111241199A 800,000.00 823,496.00 802,000.00 5.125 5.064 502 09/15/2003 5.064 502802,000.00 800,000.00 823,496,00 802,000.00 Total lnvestments and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 823,498.00 802,000.00 5.064 fiz Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date;05'/10/2002 - 08:36 lnvestments Par 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30,2002 Market Value Book Value o/o ol Portfollo Term Days to Maturlty YTM 360 Equiv, YTM 365 Equiv.Value Federal Agency Coupon Sscurities lnvestments 1 ,710,000.00 1,761,E30.10 '1,710,000.00 100.00 1,824 329 5.977 6.060 1,710,000.00 't,761,830.10 1,710,000,00 100.00% 1,826 329 5.977 6.060 Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Cunanr Y€ar A,4q.7A 86,446.67 Av.r.g. p.llyB.l.nc. 1,710,000.00 1J10,000.00 Efi.cdv. Rat of R.trm !.01!t 6.0l is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). .9{3-ar RAHN BECKER,Director/Treasurer Portfolio 98BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.04Run Date: 05i10/2002 . 08:37 I I 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments April30,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Stated BookValue Rate Moody's Page 2 CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer Average Balance Market Value YTM Days to 305 Maturity Maturlty Date Managed Pool Accounts EO LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND Subtotal and Avsrage 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Federal Agency Goupon Securlties 3133M3XE0 478 03/2611 998 1,710,000.00 1,761,830.10 Subtotal and Average 1,710,000.00 {,710,000.00 1,761,830.10 1,7{0,000.00 1,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 329 03t2612003 6.060 329 Total lnvortments and Average 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,761,830.{ 0 1,710,000.00 6.080 329 Portfolio 98BD'cP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 05/10/2002 - 08:37 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK "t i Par 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30,2002 Market Value Book Value o/o ol Portfollo Term Days to Matuilty YTM 300 Equlv. YTM 365 Equiv.lnvestments Value Managed Pool Accounts Federal Agency Coupon Securities lnvestments 6,753,305.63 1,100,000.00 6,753,305.63 1,109,625.00 8,753,305.63 1,100,000.00 85.99 14.O1 1 1,826 1 1,567 2.722 5.474 2.760 5.550 7,E53,305.63 7,862,930.63 7,853,305.63 100.00%257 220 3.108 3.151 Total Earnings April 30 Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date CuEBnrYoff 23,069.74 UO,7O1.2O Ava6g€ D.llyB.lanc. E,7E3,730.16 EtL.rlv. Rlt otR.tum 329ry. Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise tunds). {-13*o7 Rahn Becker,Dir.ffreasurer Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 05/102002 - 0E:38 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Average Balance 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfollo Details - lnvestments Apri!30,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Statsd BookValue Rate YTM Daysto 386 Maturlty YTM Maturity Date380 Managed Poo! Accounts 81 Local Agency lnv. Fd Subtotal and Average 08/0s/2001 6,753,305.63 6,753,305.83 6,753,305.63 2.740 2.722 2.760 7,083,730.16 6,75:t,305.63 6,753,305.63 6,753,305.63 2.742 2.760 Federal Agency Coupon Securltles 3133MGQR0 503 Fedsral Hom6 Loan Bank Subtotal and Average o8115t2001 1,100,000.00 't,109,625.00 1,100,000.00 5.550 5.474 5.550 1,567 08/15/2006 1,r00,000.00 5.474 5.550 1,567I,100,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,109,625,00 Total lnvestments and Average 8,783,739.16 7,853,305.63 7,862,930.03 7,853,305.63 3.108 3.151 220 Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 05/1 0/2002 - 08:3E Page2 Page 1 ofl GLK-Musso, Ann From: Rob Paratte [rparatte@mindspring.com] Sent: Saturday, May 1 1 ,2002 8:43 AM To: mcffy@aol.com; rosalieomahoney@earthlink.net; cathyb@baylock.com; Cc: amusso@burlingame.org; sparatte Subject: Safeway Expansion The Paratte Family 2612 Hale Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone 340-8414Fax 340-1719 Members of the City Council I am writing to you to express our concern about Safeway's proposed massive expansion and the impact it will have on our City's character. ln think Safeway's plans are ridiculous and will forever change, in a negative way, the look and feel of Burlingame Avenue. Consider that we already have Mollie Stone's next store and the fact that Mollie Stone's is appropriately sized for the surrounding neighborhood. By way of background I make my living in the commercial real estate business, our firm specializes in urban infill development so I write this with a bias toward private enterprise and development. I feel that a 70,000 square foot Safeway at Howard and El Camino violates every principal of sound urban planning. I think they should either remodel in the space they have or sell the parcels they have assembled so that numerous small retail stores can be built on the sites as opposed to a blockbuster like they have planned I shudder to think what a massive Safeway facade will do to the look and feel of pedestrian friendly Primrose and the small businesses located there. Please don't let Safeway proceed A. Robert Paratte 5/t312002 DISTRIBUTION: h7 // zzaz {1 7"*', kurnl rtv*rt"ru*.b XCitv Council I citu Munun., Y ci,v e,,oni.y Dir. Finance p City Planner Dir. Public Works - Human Resources I Police Chiel :l Fire Chief'I Parks & Rec i Librarian l1/WW PleaseresPond No n.r(nr. Required Pn Next neenda ,Our/on7*-,*, ;:/ & fy'*a >{o: ifuqtrs"Z ,J,,y'*7 3/d /? l^- 7La7P-t olo ?b f/" ft"f"t/ / ph4-. *, /ai/ar/ * * fu?rrrio /4"/ ,/,-//{. /@7 tr%d Z.r** *brUAr-l p.ru o r,-e PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK *" ry 4 -rrza-ct / r/" q, ry ry : f4 4z?t?-44' Xa.Vo. ;r*frrr*fu Lz4z ?/*;:br; g**L fr,y /he///-rl.t *** ,er/ e rtd*F /z,urr'rk, A,2b ,4,4-. a GLK-Musso, Ann To: Subject: cathyb@baylock.com RE: Safeway Expansion - -- - -Original Message- - - - - From: Terry Earlywine [mailto:terry@earlywinedesign.com]Sent: Tuesday, May 1-4, 2OO2 9:37 AMTo: mcffy@aoI. com; rosalieomahoney@earthlink.neti cathyb@baylock. com,- maryj anney@aol . com SubjecE: Safeway Expansion Members of t.he Cit.y Council: I am writing to you as a concerned citizen and business owner here inBurringame about safewayts proposed expansion and the impact it wil-l-have on our City's character. why do we need another poorly designed structure. we will have had Losuffer for years with the mistakes of letting the"design trends', ofthe time eg. 50s, 50s and 7os rule over what reaIIy makes our citycharming. The older L0s, 20s, and 30s archit,ectural st,yle . A great example of what can be done would be the new library. Fake fasadesand pre formed, retro embellishments just don't work. If you aregoing to take up such a massive area (?o,ooo square feet) you shouldconsider making it. a pleasant experj-ence for the public. Opencourt.yard, European market place, or Mediterranean st.yIe with largetrees interspersed. This may be more expensj-ve up front, but wourdprobably draw more people to shop and thus be more profitable foryears to come. Please consider the people of Burlingame DISTRIBUTION: Thank You, (CityCouncit ftiry fr4rnrg".Terry Earlywine f6iti a,to,r.y - Dir. Finance(fity ptanncrr Dir. publrc works - Human Resources i police Chief-r Fire Chief krleaseresPond -FNext esenoa Terry Earlywine Earlywine Design LLC L427 CasBillo Ave Burlingame CA 9401-0-5553Tel 550-348-1483 Fax 650 -348-2036 terry@earlywinedes ign . com PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK 1 u"c!^A -,- =ATsilBroadbandPO. Box 5147 San Ramon, CA 94583 April25,2002 Mr. Rahn Becker Assistant City Manager City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA. 9401C Dear Mr. Becker: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a programming adjustment being made to AT&T Broadband's cable seruices in the City of Burlingame. The change will be effective on May 29,2002. AT&T Broadband will be adding channel 77- Preview Channel to the channel line-up. This addition will not result in a modification of the current cable television rates. Please contact Kathi Noe at (650) 631-0191 extension 375 with any questions that you may have regarding this matter. Sincerely, Mitzi Givens Kathi Noe AT&T Broadband Director of Government Affairs and Franchising West Bay- Peninsula Area KN/mg -@^EP Recycled Paper