HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.08.05BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rrcur,an MrBtrNc - MoNolv, Aucusr 5, 2002
Plcn I or3
* CLOSED SESSION:
a. Threatened Litigation (Govemment Code $54956.9(b) Claim of
Chez Alexander
b. Continuation of City Manager's performance review
(Government Code $54957)
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular meeting of July 1,2002
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each
a. Appeal of Traffrc, Safety & Parking Commission's decision
regarding vehicle at I l0l Douglas Avenue
b. Appeal of Request for Design Review and Hillside Area
Construction Permit for a First and Second Story Addition at
2843 Argtello, Zoned R-l
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from
acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer
such matters to stafffor investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out
a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The
Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Introduce Ordinance to adopt the Building, Plumbing, Mechanical
and Electrical Codes
b. Introduce Fire Code Ordinance
c. Review of Citizen Participation Program for the Update of the
Bayfront Specific Area Plan
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Agreement with County
of San Mateo for Animal Control Services
b. Resolution Authorizing Reimbursement of Certain Expenditures
from Proceeds of Indebtedness (Water and Sewer Projects)
c. Resolution Awarding the City Buildings Janitorial Contract to
Universal Building Services
d. Resolution Awarding Hatch Lane Sewer Rehabilitation to Kinsel
Industries
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O
(650) 558-7200
SAGGESTED ACTION
5:00 p.m, Conference Rm A
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Approval
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Introduce
Introduce
Discussion
Approval
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rrcur,.m MBntrNc - Moxo,Ly, Aucust 5, 2AO2
PlcB 2 or 3
e. Resolution Approving a Negative Declaration for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant Reliability Improvements
f. Resolution Approving Agreement with Winzler & Kelly,
Consulting Engineers for Professional Engineering Services for
the Marsten Pump Station Improvement and Outfall Pipeline
Project
g. Resolution Accepting FY 2001/02 Annual Sidewalk Program
h. Authorize City Attorney to join in Amicus Curiae Brief in Valley
Outdoors vs. County of Riverside (SCVSS 73855) at no cost to
City
i. Warrants & Payroll, June,2002
j. Ratification of a3.33o/o Salary Increase for City Manager
k. Request for Our Lady of Angels Men's Club to serve alcoholic
beverages at Bayside Park on September 1,2002
l. Grant Application and Community Survey of Interest for 2003
Shuttle Bus Program
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees of June 18,
2002; Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission of July 2,2002
Parks & Recreation of Commission of June 20,2002 and July 18,
2002; Planning, Study Session of July, 22,2002 & Planning
Commission Meeting of July 8,2002 & July 22,2002
b. Department Reports: Police, Jtne,2002; Finance, June,2002;
Building, June,2002
c. Notice from the Executive Director of Redevelopment Agency
regarding Conflict of Interest Code
d. Notice from Executive Director of Financing Authority regarding
Conflict of Interest Code
e. Letter from Mr. & Mrs. Daniel March and City Manager's reply
Conceming Avon Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk
f. Letter from Broadway by the Bay acknowledging City's
contribution
City of Burltngame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O
(650) 5s8-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rrcur,an MBrrrNc - MoNoav, Aucust 5, 2002
Pecn 3 or3
g. Letter from San Mateo County Legal Aid Society acknowledgrng
City's contribution
13. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-
7203 at least 24 hours befbre the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the
City Clerk's otIce, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the
meeting. Visit the City's website at rvr'$.burlingafi)e .ors.. Agendas and minutes are available at this
site.
NEXT MEETING -3,2002
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O
(650) 558-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of July 1,2002
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Chambers. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAN CE TO THE FLAG
Led by Mary Hermann.
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Council Absent:
Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
None
5.
i.
Councilman Galligan made corrections to the minutes of June 17,2002, page 3, Public Hearing, item e,
Resolution 66-2002, to reflect seconding of motion and final vote and to correct the lettering on pages 4 & 5,
Section 8, Staff Reports.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve the minutes of the Council meeting of June 17,2002;
seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
PRESENTATION
Presentation bv Will Holsinger regarding "Unity in the Lieht". an Interfaith Community Event
for September 11.2002
Will Holsinger, representing Our Lady of Angels, spoke regarding "Unity in the Light", a project to light up
the community as a symbol of unity, common humanity and faith in the future. The ceremony is symbolized
by sand candles or luminaries. This ceremony is being planned for Our Lady of Angels Church on
September 11,2002 to mark the passing of one year since the tragic terrorist acts against thousands of people
on September I l, 2001.
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to endorse a similar program at City Hall on September 11,2002;
seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony; approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
July 1,2002
4. MINUTES
I
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
^. Approval of Dwight Road Traffic Calmine Proiect
DPW Bagdon recommended council hold a public hearing and adopt the Dwight Road Traffic Calming
Project. This project has been a joint effort by the City and the neighborhood over the last two years to
reduce the traffic speed on Dwight Road. Randy Grange, 2l Dwight Road, spoke on behalf of the
neighborhood and made a brief presentation to Council.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Lynn Feeney, l5 Dwight Road, spoke in favor of the project.
There were no further comments and the hearing was closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the first portion of the project, the gateway entrance
and bulb-outs, study the effects and then consider approval on the traffic signal modification; seconded by
Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
b. Resolution # 74-2002 a Neqative Declaration and the2002-2006 Housine
Element Update. an Amendment to the Burlingame General Plan
CP Monroe recommended Council approve the Negative Declaration and review the Draft Housing Element,
hold a public hearing and take action on the Negative Declaration and the amendment to the General Plan to
adopt the 2001 -2006 Housing Element.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Chris Keele, 2l Hayward Court, commended the Planning staff
and the City Planner, Meg Montoe, for their fine work in putting the Housing Element together. There were
no further comments and the hearing was closed.
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve Resolution # 74-2002, approving a negative declaration and
adopting the2002-2006 housing element update, an amendment to the Burlingame General Plan; seconded
by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
c. Adoption of Ordinance #1691 for an Amendment to the ZoninsCode Addine Retail Sales Uses
and Allowing Health Services in the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Commercial Areas
CP Monroe recommended Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance #1691to add two retail uses
and allow, as a conditional use, health services above the first floor in the Broadway cofirmercial area and
define two new retail commercial uses and add them to the C-l zone and its overlay districts, Burlingame
Avenue, Subarea B.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. Ann Hinkle, 1616 Sanchez Avenue, and Karen & Jay
Scheikowitz, 1465 Crystal Drive, spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. There were no further
comments and the hearing was closed.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to adopt Ordinance #1691; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney requested CC Musso publish a summary of the
Ordinance within l5 days of adoption.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes2
July l, 2002
d.San Mateo Countv Tourism Business District: i) Adoot Resolution #75-2002
Establishins Interim Policy Resarding Assessment Abatements due to Construction or Disaster.
and ii) Adopt Resolution #76-2002Approving Abatement of Assessments for April. Mav. June of
2002 for the Park Plaza Hotel due to Hotel Reconstruction
CA Anderson recommended Council hold a public hearing to adopt Resolution #75-2002 to establish interim
policy regarding assessment abatements due to construction or disaster after 45 days and adopt Resolution
#76-2002 approving abatement of assessments for ParkPlaza Hotel for the months of April, May & June,
2002 due to hotel reconstruction.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve Resolution #75-2002 to establish an interim policy
regarding assessment abatements due to construction or disaster; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve Resolution #76-2002 to approve abatement of assessments
for April, May and June,2002, for the Park Plaza Hotel due to hotel reconstruction; seconded by
Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
e. AdoBtOrdinance #1692 to Establish 2002-03 Water Rates
ACM Becker requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance #1692 to establish 2002-03 water
rates.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. John Taylor, 839 Crossway Road, and Bob Nager,l20 La Mesa,
spoke in opposition of the increased water rates. There were no further comments from the floor and the
hearing was closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Ordinance #1692 establishing2}}2-l3 water rates;
seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney requested CC
Musso publish a summary of the Ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
f. Adqpt Ordinance #1693 to Establish 2002-
ACM Becker requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance #1693 to establish 2002-03
sewer rates.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve Ordinance #1693, establishing2}l2-l3 sewer rates;
seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Janney requested CC
Musso publish a summary of the Ordinance within l5 days of adoption.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
J July 1,2002
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chun Lee, 237 5 Fallingtree Drive, San Jose, CA and Andrew Ellsmere, I 701 Charles Avenue, Arcadia, CA
spoke regarding the practice of Falun Gong.
8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
None.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR
a.Resolution #77-2002 Authorizins a Professional Services Agreement with Erler and Kalinowski.
Inc. for Program Management of Water System and Water Ouality Improvements. FY 2002/
2003, ciw Jo! I1q.E0720
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #77-2002 authorizing a Professional Services
Agreement with Erler & Kalinowski, Inc. for program management of water system and water quality
improvements for FY 200212003.
b. Resolution #78-2002 Easton Branch
Renovation Contract
CL Escoffier recommended Council approve Resolution #78-2002 approving agreement for Architectural
Services with Dahanukar Brandes for Easton Branch Library renovation contract.
c. Resolution #79-2002 Awardins a Professional Services Contract to Undereround Construction
Management for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation. Phase I and Phase II
DPW Bagdon recommended Council Approve Resolution #79-2002 awarding a Professional Services
Contract to Underground Construction Management for the Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase I
and Phase II.
d. Resolutions # 80-81-82-2002 NPDES Stormwater Manaeement Plan - 2002-2003 General
Program Budget
DPW Bagdon recommended Council Approve Resolutions #80-81-82-2002 NPDES Stormwater
Management Plan -2002-2003 General Program Budget.
e.(1) Resolution #83-2002 Authorizins Asreement with Kellins. Northcross & Nobrisa for Financial
Advisor Services. and (2) Resolution #84-2002 Authorizine Agreement with Orrick. Herrinston &
Sutcliffe for Bond Counsel Services
ACM Becker recommended Council approve (1) Resolution #83-2002 atthoizing agreement with Kelling,
Northcross & Nobriga for financial advisor services, and (2) Resolution #84-2002 authorizing agreement
with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for bond counsel services.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes4
July 1,2002
f. Resolution #85-2002 Adoptine Extension of Abandon Vehicle Abatement Prosram (AVAP) until
April2012
PC Missel recommended Council approve Resolution #85-2002 adopting the extension of the current
abandon vehicle abatement program (AVAP) until April 2012.
g. Resolution #86-2002 Approvine Adjustment to Salary Increase for City Afforney
CM Nantell recommended Council approve Resolution #86-2002 authorizing a salary increase for City
Attomey.
h. Resolution #87-2002 Authorizing Agreement with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to
Provide Information and Promotion Services in 2002-2003 and Resolution #88-2002 Authorizing
Asreement with Conflict Resolution Center to Provide Conciliation and Mediation
Services in2002-2003
EA Weber recommended Council adopt Resolution #87-2002 authorizing agteement with the Burlingame
Chamber of Commerce to provide information and promotion services in2002-2003, and adopt Resolution
#88-2002 authorizing agreement with Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center to provide conciliation and
mediation services in 2002-2003.
Councilwoman Galligan pulled item 9(g) and made a motion to approve the consent calendar (a) through (h),
excluding (g); seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilman Galligan suggested that the salary adjustment for the City Attomey (item 9g) be adjusted so that
the first year increase is 9% (instead of 6.5%) and the second year increasebe 4o/o, which is more in line with
the rest of the department head increases over the next two years. He noted that the bottom line adjustment
is the same. Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve 9(g) with that adjustment; seconded by
Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
10. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City.
11. OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
12. NEW BUSINESS
CA Anderson reported on the Closed Session to discuss five items
l. Personnel Matter: Mid-Year Performance Review of the City Manager (Government Code $ 54957)
2. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code $ 54957.6: City Negotiator: Jim
Nantell, Labor Organizations: Unrepresented Employees: City Attorney
3. Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code $ 54956.8: Property:
2832 Hillside Drive (Fire Station 35); Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Larry Anderson, Rahn
Becker; Negotiating Party: AT&T Wireless Services; Under negotiation: Request for lease for
locating cellular antenna.
Burlingame City Council 5 Jily 1,2002
Unapproved Minutes
c.
4. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Govemment Code $ 54957.6: City Negotiators: Jim
Nantell and Bob Bell; Labor Organization: Burlingame Police Officers Association.
5. Threatened Litigation (Govemment Code $ 54956.9(bXl), (3XC) Claim of Linda and Peter
Fairclough, which was denied by Council.
Councilman Coffey requested staff review the privacy resolution the City of Daly City was considering to
see if the City of Burlingame should also entertain such a resolution on behalf of our citizens.
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a.Commissioner Minutes: Library, May 14, 2002; Traffic, Safety and Parking, June 13,2002; Planning,
June24,2002
b. Department Reports: Police, May,2002
Letter from Joe Karp commending Syed Murtuza and Bill Lowrie for their assistance and
professionalism on the l4l I Chapin Avenue project.
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m. in memory of Frankie Baylock, beloved dog of
Councilwoman Baylock.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes6
July l, 2002
CP Monroe requested a Public Hearing for 2843 Arguello Drive at the August 5,2002 Council Meeting.
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 8t5t2002
5a
STAFF REPORT
TO Honorable Mavor and
DATE: July29.2002
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPEAL OF TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING
VEHICLE AT 1101 DOUGLAS AVENUE - VIN 136800L205866, CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO.
48808c
RECOMMENDATION:
Deny appeal of Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission decision, and order removal or abatement of inoperable
vehicle, California license no. 48808G, by August 20,2002.
DISCUSSION:
The Chief of Police and the Code Enforcement Officer identified an inoperable gold-colored pick-up at l l0l
Douglas Avenue as liable for abatement under Chapter 13.65 of the Municipal Code. Notice of potential
removal was given to the vehicle's owner, who appealed the order to the Traffic, Safety and Parking
Commission; following a continuance at the owner's request, the Commission heard the appeal on July Z,Z0O2.
The Commission found that the vehicle was inoperable and subject to removal/abatement by July 16,2002. The
owner filed an appeal of the decision to the City Council.
The attached materials outline the background and the conclusion that the vehicle is inoperable. The flat tire
depicted in previous photographs has been repaired. However, the car continues to be inoperable and it has not
been re-registered with the DMV.
Staff recommends that following the public hearing, the Council consider affirming the Commission's decision
and directing removal of the vehicle no later than Augustz},2oo2.
Attachments
Appeal Letter dated July 15,2002
Response to appeal dated Ju,ly 17,2002
Photograph of vehicle as of July 29,2002
Notice of decision dated JuJy 8,2002
Minutes of TSPC hearing on July 2,2002
Staff report to TSPC dated June 6, 2002, including attachments
BY
BY
Larrv F,. Anderson Citv Itornev
/
Mayor and Council
Re: Appeal of TSPC Decision on Vehicle at 1101 Douglas Avenue
July 29,2002
Page2
Distribution
W. Douglas Weaver
Chief of Police
Director of Public Works
ts
ltrETE RED ITOTJSE
CALIFORNIA AT DOUGLAS
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
3at&*
3"1 Z- otiL{g
C- ,l -( C lerL JolY ,{, (ta
LJ +l ot>t te*lze A".J,*; l'-r\'l 4L
$ +t^l," v/€.crr o^J rxc"iuel ; +" o^ J.,,\y '2n\
-f l^) s is
"
'n t'c1ou'rzl* {c'r o\ Ch4c1 ' E[ccuul nD
d -l % yo % t, - E tzq oa*4 o' Vec'''i 'J t' '-^-0no "t ol-
1J^,( Ll l-l 'La o nci ) '
fl L oton{ ?t+ & /esPo>a( u;t['i^
t doY.s r i[.' l l asso Mq t)^"1 tl"J s'-'*\fav
is -\ c-, , ed ' Any "tHo*;* {a r<n^a$ e *ht-
{, < [".lcJ e fu, r- w1 Y r io r.l< Art ioa-r-dcl*Y /
-t-\"< E{*fe prli. e co.l\ be qon}a.c1c4-
I
I
:
I
i
RECEIVED
IJUL i 5 2002
gwRLH$f,P,I'JfiE
<,c
l<r.l ?o.ttn3eE
-ilo^h Y',
tn-&*balq
I
I
G\n@ilg fiWurlingame
OFFICE OF THE
CITYATTORNEY
CITY HALL _ 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURUNGAA'E. CALIFORNIA 94O.tO-397 TEL: (650) 55&744
FAX (650) 556-9287
Iuly 17,2002
Mr. W- Douglas Weaver
1101 Douglas Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Appeal of Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission Decision regarding Chewolet Et
Camino Vehicle
Dear Mr. Weaver:
In response to your letter of July 15, 2002, the City Clerk has placed your appeal of the
Commission's decision on the public hearing portion of the City Council agenda for the
Council's next regularly scheduled meeting on August 5,2002, at 7 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. [f you wish to submit written materials for the
Council's review before the hearing, please have them to the City Clerk's Office no later than 5
p.m. on Tuesday, July 30, 2002.
Y ANDERSON
City
City Clerk
Chief of Police
Director of Public Works
Re:
cc:
a
!
F
m
&
i.
k*
,s
trlfiiHi l
, ..
.:;:*-,
'lr*h-*
{W
*;fiM-
}d:
brL- - Q
I 101 Douglas .'r
BU ME
City of Burlingame
Office of the City Attorney
Code Enforcement Bureau
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California 94010 (650) 558-7208, Fax: (650) 342-8386
July 8, 2002
Mr. Douglas Weaver
1101 Douglas Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Weaver:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm the fact that on Tuesday, luly 2,2}O2,the burlingame Traffic, Safety and
Parking Commission held a public hearing regarding the allegation that there was an inoperative vehicle stored in
the driveway of your property at 1101 Douglas Avenue.
At the conclusion of the hearing the commission made a determination that the vehicle, a Chewolet El Camino,
California license 48808G was in fact inoperative and ordered that the vehicle be removed from the driveway of
yow property by no later than Tuesday, July 16,2002.
Under our ordinance you are allowed to store the vehicle in an area that is not visible from the street.
ffyou wish to appeal the order of the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission you must do so by filing a written
notice of appeal with the city clerk within five days of the date of this letter.
Such appeal shall be heard by the city council which may affirm, amend or reverse the order or take other action
deemed appropriate.
The clerk shall give written notice of the time and place of the hearing to the appellant and those persons specified
in section 13.65.045.
Sincerely,
Alfred J. Palmer
Code Enforcement Offi cer
cc:City Attorney
Chief of Police
Gerald Zanginger, Attorney, 1200 Howard Ave#201, Burlingame
TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, July 2, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair Mclver
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners present.
4. CIJRRENT BUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4.1.1 Minutes for June 13, 2002, were submitted and approved
4.1.2 Appeal Regarding Vehicle at 1101 Douglas Avenue - Public Hearing
Mr. Palmer advised this is a public hearing requested by Mr. Weaver as a follow up to a code
enforcement violation of an inoperable vehicle parked in Mr. Weaver's driveway. The City
requested he move the vehicle; however, Mr. Weaver said he would not. The Commission should
find whether or not the vehicle is operable. If inoperable, then make the determination how much
time Mr. Weaver has to remove it and then prepare an Order to remove the vehicle. This action
will allow Mr. Weaver one more opportunity for appeal which will be to the City Council.
From the floor, Mr. Weaver stated that the vehicle has been in his family since 1972: and he is
restoring it. However, he recently broke his hip which has slowed down the restoration work. The
vehicle is parked on corlmercial property, and he has seen car agencies park non-licensed cars
almost into the street. It is not a nuisance or an eyesore and is registered with the DMV as a non-
operating vehicle. He also asked who made the complaint. Mr. Palmer advised that when the
hearing is concluded, he may ask for this information in writing. Mr. Palmer then advised that
the ordinance applies to all zones, including commercial. The registration has to do with operation
of the vehicle on the street. Under City ordinance, he is free to park the vehicle in his garage or
within a fenced rear yard.
Comm. Evans stated that the City has a right to enforce its ordinances regardless of how long the
violation has existed. The Commission has determined that the vehicle is not operational and
Comm. Evans recommends giving Mr. Weaver two weeks to remove the vehicle. Comm. Cohen
stated that Mr. Weaver is lucky that he has room on the side of his property behind the fence to
place the vehicle. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Evans/De Angelis) to authorize the City
to take action after two weeks, July 16, 2002, instructing Mr. Weaver to move the subject
vehicle. Unanimously approved by the Commission.
4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.2.1 Millbrae BART Station - Traffic and Parking Impacts on City streets - Possible Effects and
Traffic Commission Hearing Schedule
Chair Mclver stated that he and Comm. Cohen met to evaluate approaches in contacting affected
The City of Burlingame Page 2
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM f
MTG.
DATE 6113t2002
TO:Traffic^ .Safetv & Parkinp IBY
DATE:Ivne 6-2002
FROM: Larry E. Anderson. Citv
APPEAL REGARDING VEHICLE AT 1101 DOUGLAS AVEIIUE _ VIN 136800L205866,
CALIFORNIA LICENSE NO. 48808G
sslon
SIJBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Hold public hearing regarding the condition ofthe 1970 gold-colored Chewolet pick-up, California license
number 48808G and determine whether to take action with regard to the vehicle underburlingame Municipal
Code section 13.65.055.
DISCUSSION:
The Chief of Police and the Code Enforcement Officer have identified a gold-colored pick-up at l l0l Douglas
Avenue as a vehicle liable to abatement under Chapter 13.65 of the Uunicipal Code. Attached is the report
from the Code Enforcement Officer regarding the vehicle and procedure employed to date. The vehicle was
posted for abatement on May 15, 2002.
The owner of the property at l10l Douglas Avenue has requested a hearing before the Commission. The
Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission took over responsibility from the former Public Health & Safety
Commission for vehicle abatement when it was created in 1975.
Pursuant to Section 13.65.055, the Commission is to hear all facts and testimony as the Commission deems
pertinent:
The facts and testimony may include testimony on the condition of the vehicle or parts thereof and the
circumstances concerning its location on the private property or public property. The commission.-.shall
not be limited by the technical rules of evidence. The owner of the land may appear in person at the
hearing or present a sworn written statement in time for consideration at the hearing, and deny
responsibility for the presence of the vehicle on the land, with his reasons for such denial.
The commission ...may impose such conditions and take such other action as it deems appropriate
under the circumstances to carry out the purpose of this chapter. It may delay the time for removal of the
vehicle or parts thereof i{, in its opinion, the circumstances justiff it. At the conclusion of the public
hearing, the commission... may find that a vehicle or parts thereof has been abandoned, wrecked,
dismantled or is inoperative on private or public property and order the same removed from the property
?b
Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission
Re: Appeal Regarding Vehicle at I101 Douglas
Jlune 6,2002
Page2
as a public nuisance and disposed of as hereinafter provided and determine the administrative costs and
the cost of removal to be charged against the owner of the land. The order requiring removal shall
include a description of the vehicle or parts thereof and the correct identification number and license
number of the vehicle if available at the site.
If it is determined at the hearing that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of the
owner of the land and that he has not subsequently acquiesced in its presence, the commission ... shall
not assess the costs of administration or removal of the vehicle against the property upon which the
vehicle is located or otherwise attempt to collect such costs from such owner of the land.
If the owner of the Iand submits a sworn written statement denlng responsibility for the presence of
the vehicle on his land but does not appear, or if an interested parfy makes a written presentation to the
commission ..., he shall be notified in writing of the decision.
The City has chosen not to exact any administrative costs for removal, but will only seek the acfual costs and
time incurred in any subsequent removal.
Attachment
Memorandum from Fred Palmer dated Jwre 4,2002
Dishibution
Chief of Police
Sergeant Cutler
To:Larry Anderson, City Attorney
From:Fred Palmer, Code Enforcement Officer
Subject: 1l0l DouglasAvenue,InoperativeVehicle, Case200200947
Date:June 4,2002
This office received a report of an inoperative vehicle that had been at 1l0l Douglas Avenue for
a long period of time. The owner of the property, Wesley D. Weaver, was contacted and has
refused to move the vehicle or restore it to an operating condition. In accordance with city
ordinance 13.65 notices were sent to him via registered mail. Mr. Weaver, through his attomey,
has requested a public hearing on the matter. Following is chronology of events-
May 5,2002 An email was received reporting the violation
May7,2002 I made a site inspection and found an oldermodel chewolet, pickup type,
vehicle. The left front tire was flat and the bed was cluttered with debris.
After veriffing the complaint and taking s photograph an inquiry was
made with the Department of Motor vehicles. They did not have any
registration on filed for the vehicle (Califomia License 48808G). A letter
was mailed to Mr- weaver notifying him of the violation and requesting
him to remove the vehicle.
May 8,2002 Mr, weaver called my office. when I spoke with him he told me that he
had received my letter and that he did not intend to remove the vehicle or
make it operable. He told me that the engine had been pickled (prepared
for long term storage) and it did not run.
I also gave Mr. weaver the option of registering the vehicle and repairing
the flat tire so, at least, it would look presentable. He still refused.
, ir,.
^{-_!ti
\ ---l
t.
I
I
'\.
e.'
:,
Page2 - 1101 Douglas,Inoperable Vehicle
May 14,2002
May 15,2002 Photos Taken
May 24,2002
In,day28,2002
lwrc 4,2002
Attachments.
Mr- weaver called my office and advised me that he had turned the matter
over to his attorney.
A written request was made by an Attomey for Mr. weaver requesting a
public hearing.
Notice sent to Mr. weaver and his attomey that the public Hearing was
scheduled for June 13, 2002.
Photos Taken
Photos Taken
Type
Address
LName
FName
Phone
Date
Case
RPLaName
RPFNam
RPAddres
RPPhone
How
H Out
1101 Douglas Business
Remarks
Dispo
lnspeclion E ONorified El
Ref
W. Wesley Chevrolet 48808G. Lefrer sent to remove.
called and said that he had a '10 yr old
of non operability on the car and the engine rvas
@repared for long term inaction). lt did not
I told hlm that he had to get the rrehide reg'lstercd
keep it that uay. He objected. He said that it nras his
and we ould not do anything about removing the
Mr. Weavercalled and said he tumed this matter
to his attomey and refuses to move the vehide.
I prepated and Police Chief Missd signed the
d lntention to Abate. A copy uras mailed,
mail and first dass mail and a copy was scotch
to the windshield of the ar at l2:4O PM,
Ptrotos were taken.
letter requesting a hearing was received.
Photos Taken
Photos taken
lnoperative vehide in thereports an
DateDue
CODEENFORCEMENT
REPORT
Zoning
Weaver
Smoi
2002w947
Eisenman
ME
'l .-. ,!'ft I 'iity of BurlingamL
Office of the City Attorney
Code Enforcement Bureau
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, california 94010 (650) 558-7208, Fax: (650) 342-g3g6
May 7,2002
W. Wesley Weaver
ll01 Douglas Ave
Burlingame, Ca 94010
NOTICE OFINTENTION TO ABATE AI\ID REMO\IE AI\t INOPERATIYE OR I'NREGISTERED
\{EIIICLE AS A PT'BLIC ITUISAIYCE. I
DearMr. Weaver:
A complaint has been received by this ofhce about the Gold Chenrolet pickup, California License 4S808G which is
parked in your driveway on California Drive.
There is no current record of registration for this vehicre on file
with the Departrnent of Motor Vehicles.
As defined in our city ordinances this vehicle constitutes a
nuisance and you are hereby notified to abate said nuisance by the
removal of the vehicle within l0 days of the mailing of this
notice-
In accordance with our ordinances city officials may enter upon
private or public property to examine a vehicle and to re-ou, or
cause the rernoval of the vehicle.
In order to avoid enforcement action in this matter please either register or remove this vehicle prior to May 23,2002.
Your anticipated.cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
AlfredJ. Palmer
Code Enforcement Officer
cc:CityAttorney
ili
t
I
I
t!
CITY
'v
_\
City of Burlingamb
Office of the City Attorney
Code Enforcement Bureau
501 Primrose Road, Budlngrm€, Crlifornh 94010 (650) 55&7208, Fer: (650) 342{386
May 16,2002
Wesley Douglas Weaver
I l0l Douglas Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Weaver:
As owner shown on the last equalized assessmeniroll ofthe land located at I l0l Douglas Avenue, you are hereby
notified that the undersigned, pursuant to Section 13.65.040 of the Burlingame Municipal Code, has determined
that there exists upon said land an (or parts ofan) abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicle registered
to (no registration on file), license munber 48808G, which constitutes a public nuisance punuant to the provisions
of Title 13.65 of the Burlingame Municipal Code.
You are hereby notified to abate said nuisance by the rernoval ofsaid vehicle (or said parts ofa vehicle) within l0
days from the date ofmailing of this notice, and upon your failure to do so the same will be abated and removed by
the city, and the costs thereo{, assessed to you as owner ofthe land on which said vehicle (or said parts ofa
vehicle) is located.
As owner ofthe land on which said vehicle (or said parts ofa vehicle) is located, you are hereby notified that you
may, within l0 days after the mailing of this notice of intention, request a public hearing and ifsuch a request is not
received by the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission within such 10 day period, the Chief of Police shall.have
the authority to abate and rernove said vehicle (or said parts ofa vehicle) as a public nuisance and assess.the costs
as aforesaid without a public hearing. You may submit a swom written staternent within such l0 day period
denying responsibility for the presence ofsaid vehicle (or said parts ofa vehicle) on said land, with your rg1pons
for denial, and such statement shall be construed as a request for hearing at which your presence is not ii4uiiira.
You may appear in person at any hearing requested by you or the owner of the vehicle or, in lieu thereo{ may
present a swom, written statement, as aforesaid, in time for consideration at such hearing.
led
l.--"22.( .azs/
ChiefofPolice
CityAttomey
Code Enforcement OIEcer
BURt
cc:
Gerald J. Tanvinger
William R. Johnston
ZANZINGER & JOIINSTON
Attomeys at lrw
1200 Howard Avenue., Suite Z)l
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 3,144848
Facsimile: (650) 3,14451 I
Half Moon Bay Office:
225 S- Cabrillo Hwy., lll C
Half MoonBay, CA 9Ol9
HAND DELIVERBD
2002
Traffic Safety and
Parking Commission
CITY OF BT]RLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: V/esley Douglas Weaver
Ladies/Gentlemen:
This letter will serve to notify the Trafiic Safety and Parking Commission that
Wesley Douglas Weaver requests a public hearing regarding Mr. Weaver's alleged violation of
Title 13.65 of the Burlingame Municipal Code.
Please send Notice of the Hearing to me at the above address.
J. ZANZINGER
GJAeck
cc: Wesley Douglas Weaver
s/r4 zd?/
/ 3:oo7-m'
={
CITY City of Burlingame
Office of the City Attorney
Code Enforcement Bureau
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Celifornla 94010 (6e[ 55&7208, I'ar: (650) 342{386
May28,2002
Gerald J. Zmztnger
Attomey at Law
1200 Howard Ave. Suite20l
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: Wesley Douglas Weaver
Dear Mr. Zarrzinger:
Further to your letter dated May 23,2O02 apfthc hearing has been scheduled with the TrafiEc Safety and Parking
Commission on Thursday, June 13,2002 at 7:00 PM, Burlingame CityHall,50l Primrose Road in Conference
Room A.
Sincerely,
AIfred J. Palmer
Code Enforcement Officer
cc:CityAttomey
'Wesley D. Weaver
HAY 1,','
!1
Il
il.': J , .' .-:. .i-': .
I,i
1
l
I
i,.-=]
ii i
t:
ii
n!l
ii
i):i
:t\
:
a
,i-
,l.
ili
II
,f
I
"i -
:. -l
t: _-.
i-
- -lj --
" .:1
: i+:
;il:.r .
l:j: '
.t!
-' , i{;
,: ,, i ,
;t
-.ii 't-\ _=_._
_. ,e*.-r.-:. :-.: ::.,.-":','.:
{;ir
,iag#i'r"-_;n,-'i :
fnV
\
I
.l .j
1
1
,i
j
r
";': ::i-,/, ::
\,
I
\'\'
rt_____.. ,- - -.- __L
1.r', ." : -,. .^.*. .-..1
l'.: , li
'i\ --;1'1,:!:;i"a-',. t
::ir
:,.1rrj
.. ,i !
;.:
\
'f't:',
:: '?t
,:i ,
i,
'i:
ea4,4
ll .
I
. ..:
I
".:'.
,i --i
t
i
IT
:1
::
,ij
,l
ii
I i ri
I
...1
-
^*:
't'"
{\i -.\
1.. I I
'!
,t{ -".}I i :I\,*:. ,1\;/
i
'!'
1 ..t
;.
: .F
.' ii:
.f
" ...: -*i
't.:
.,.. g. .-..r,l::
*
t'.'-::'
#-_
#."
"\r.,,,,,
1.,,:.
tr
:i
ii,:t.
!
rt'I't
:
ri
' ' l:-. '"" -' -"'
: \1 \-..
II
I
it.
l,
1
,\t\t.\
\ti I*V
l!
lt
il*
,:+.-+
:, ..
,,1,
-.-- ,-_::-'l: .;7-;.. -
;". \,'.\i .. .^.
I i.] .':,
,.,.1"
ii
:'.!
i:i'
i,:
,;..-''
4..t
i:il
I
l:,. .)
-:1.11, 'tttr ":
:
"in
t
^ii..I', \i. :;*,*;
., i..,]':.
trlt erse L0G0NV/|Z
Frocon'rs'l'r Flus Teinet D tr|tr
R55ES5BH STREEH
I{ERUER IIESLEY I][]UGLRS
I HRUI RY
ax code 'l-BB I
II]
ai r 0aks
l. First or,,ner?. Second ot ner3. fare of or,,ner
t3. Il,l. Gt5. F
{. Sttus ffddress5. City
I tBt
8?g
I][]UGLRS RUE 16. Land value
l? . I t'rprouel,rent
$l5l,z.l2
$75,617
E. Hai I address?. Citv, State
IIBI DtlUGLffS ffUE
BUBLI HGRI1E, TR g{B I B
tB.
tg.
?4.
Sale
Ieed
5ale
date
nunrberprice
a?-28-
85 I 3?{
B?
5g
B. Exet,rpt i on
g . 0t her Ex elnpt .
Htl
BBBBBBBBTBBB ?l .
??.
23.
?q.
?5.
Pl anni nq Hbhd
fensus tract
fensus bl ock
Zon i ng
Units
I B. Use
I I . Land 5q. Ftl?. flcres
13 Store or 0ffice & Hesidence
28. Lesal.l,l FT X I
LRHI] CO IlR(H)elp, (
descr i pt i
85 FT COH
PHt1ZRSP)rint, (
on
sffH I1RTEO I]B RHI] I]I]UGLRS RUE PTH I]F Lt]I BBLI]TK.I BUBLIHGffI1E
N IIl38ttr)uit, (R)epaint?
i (#!i'
STAFF REPORT
AGEI\DA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 8.s.02
TO: IIONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE:JALY 22,
APPROYED
F'ROM:CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: APPEAL OT REQUEST FOR DESIGN REYIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AI\D SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 2843
ARGUELLO DRIyE, ZOIYED R-1.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should hold a public hearing and take action. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated
for the record. The Councils action altematives include:
a. Approve the request as proposed by resolution with conditions;
b. Deny the request; or
c. Deny the request without prejudice and return the project to the applicant and Planning Commission
for redesign and additional review.
Conditions to be considered at the public hearing:
l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent date
stamped June 14, 2002, Sheets A1-1 througtr A3-2 site plans, floor plans and building elevations, and
the two skylights on the front of the house shall be tinted to reduce night glare, the tint shall be
approved by the Planning Deparhnent prior to issuance of the building permit;
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architecfural features or changing
the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
3. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or fuIl demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
4. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's and the City Engineer's May 13,2002, memos shall be
met;
5. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the
roofridge and provide certification of that height to the building department;
6. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed
professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window
5b
BY
llw^nvtYWl*-
\rI
. .4T?EAL OF REQAEST FOR DESIGN REWEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FORA FIRST AND
SECOND STORYADDITION AT 2843 ARGUELLO DRIYE, ZONED R-l Augast 5.2002
locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional
involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of
perjury;
7. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window t1pe, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans; and
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition,
as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Planning Commission Action
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Dean Hirabayashi, is requesting design review and a hillside area construction permit for a first
and second story addition to the existing house at2843 Arguello Drive, zoned R-1. The existing house is a
single story structure with an attached garuEe and2,639 SF in floor area (0.30 FAR), the remodeled house will
have 3,731SF (0.43 FAR) where 3,848 SF (0.44 FAR) is the maximum allowed. With the proposal 200 SF
will be in filled and added on the left side at the first floor along with an 892 SF second story addition placed
at about the middle of the house. The current attached garage provides two covered parking spaces 2A'x20'
and meets the offskeet parking requirements for the five bedroom house.
Design Review
Planning Commission reviewed this item :rt study on June 10,2002, and gave the architect some suggestions.
At that time the issue of view obstruction was discussed and the applicant directed to stall story poles. The
applicant made some revisions to the plans including: reducing the number of skylights on the front elevation;
removing semi-circular windows on the front and rear elevations; and changing the front and rear second
floor roof from gable ends to hip ends to sit the addition down into the house. The applicant noted in an
attached memo that the addition was not moved back on the house because it would block the next door
neighbor's view.
Staff Comments,
Staff would note that the major concerns expressed by the public during the design review and action meeting
on this project were about view obstruction. The packet includes a number of letters regarding the project for
your reference. It should also be noted that, in this case, up holding the Planning Commission's action would
allow the applicant to make design changes and resubmit the project to the Planning Commission without
paylng additional fees. The criteria for design review and an Hillside Area Construction Permit are attached
following this staff report.
2
At their meeting on June 24,20U, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-0-1 (C.
Osterling absent) to deny without prejudice the applicants request for a first and second story addition at2843
Arguello Drive. In their action the Commissioners noted: views from 1600 Sebastian will be blocked, a
portion (60-65%) by the existing trees which are tallerthan the proposed addition about 35% of the view is
blocked by the proposed addition, some -iiew could be restored by trimming the trees which would reduce the
impact of the addition on the view; house at 1600 Sebastian has distant views from windows on the other side
of the house, but more needs to be done with the neighbors, if could find a solution would be willing to
consider a compromise on setbacks and lot coverage, to design the project to the views.
. x,*A* OF RESUEST FOR DESIGN REWEW ATVD HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRACTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AIVD
vECOND STORY ADDITION AT 2543 ARGWLLO DRIW, ZONED R-I August 5' 2A02
ATTACHMENTS:
Action Alternatives and Criteria for Hillside Area Construction Permit and Design Review Criteria
Dean and Debra Hirabayashi letter to the City Council, July 22,2002, applicants 2843 Arguello
Monroe letter to Dean and Debbie Hirabayashi, July 2,2002, setting appeal hearing
Dean and Debra Hirabayashi letter to City Council, July l, 2002, requesting appeal
Planning Commission Minutes, Jlurire 24, 2002
Vivian Lee letter to Planning Commission, June 6,2002
Kwok To and Rosario wong letterto Planning Department, June 15,2002
Noemi Avram, Gumbinger irrurn Architects, Revised East Elevation documenting location of up hill
neighbor's house, June 7, 2002
Planning commission Staff Report, June 24, 2002 with attachments
City Council Resolution
Public Notice
Revised Plans, date stamped June 14,2002
2
J
2843 Arguello Drive
ACTION ALTERNATIVES
1. City council may vote in favor of an applicant's request. If the action is a
variance, use permit, hillside area construction permit, fence exception, sign
exception or exception to the antenna ordinance, the Council must make findings
as required by the code. Findings must be particular to the given properties and
request. Actions on use permits should be by resolution. A majority of the
Council members seated during the public hearing must agree in order to pass an
a{Iirmative motion.
City Council may deny an applicanl's request. The reasons for denial should be
clearly stated forthe record.
City Council may deny a request without prejudice. This action should be used
when the application made to the City Council is not the same as that heard by the
Planning Commission, when a Planning Commission actioulras been justifiably,
with clear direction, denied without prejudice; or when the proposed project raises
questions or issues on which the Council would like additional information or
additional design work before acting on the project Direction about additional
information required to be given to staff, applicant and Planning
Commission/City Council for the further consideration should be made very clear.
Council should also direct whether any subsequent hearing should be held before
the City Council or the Planning Commission.
REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR AN HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
Code Sec. 25.61.060 Review by the planning commission or city council shall be based
upon the obstruction by the construction of the existing distant views of nearby
properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable
areas within a dwelling unit.
DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA
The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance Nol l59l adopted by the
Council on April 20,1998 are as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the
neighborhood,
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
City Council
City of Burlingame
Burlingame, CA 94010
REC EIVTD
JUL 2 5 700?
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
July 22,2002
To the Burlingame Crty Council:
We are appealing the decision made by the Planning Commission on June
24,2002 regarding our home at2843 Arguello Drive, Burlingame. The
house plans submitted to the Plannihg Commission conform to the
Burlingame planning code. No requests for variances were made. The
concems expressed by the Planning Commission on June 10,2002 were all
addressed by our architect, and corrected in the revised plans submitted for
the June 24,2002 meeting.
At the request of our uphill neighbors, the Cotters, at2847 Arguello Drive,
we changed the roof design at the front and rear of the second story addition
from a gable to a hip in order to minimize obstruction of their views. At the
request of our downhill neighbors at2839 Arguello Drive, we moved the
master bedroom toward the uphill back corner of the addition to allow them
more privacy.
We moved the front of the upstairs addition toward the back because of
aesthetic concerns of our neighbors directly across the street at 2838
Arguello Drive.
At the June 24,2002 Planning Commrssion meeting commissioner Auran
noted that approximately two thirds of the view obstruction of our neighbor
at 1600 Sebastian was from ourtrees, and approximately one third of the
view obstruction would be from ourproposed second story addition. At that
meeting we offered to trim our fiees in order to enhance the views of our
neighbors. In fact, rimming the trees would probably enhance the views of
our uphill neighbors both at 1600 Sebastian and at 2847 Arguello Drive. In
spite of this offer, it appears that the Planning Commission decided to deny
our application because of concerns about view obstmction from the small
kitchen window of our neighboa Mrs. Umland, at 1600 Sebastian Drive.
Mrs. Umland has beautiful, expansive views of the bay and airport from her
living room and her dining room. Our second story addition would block a'
very small view of the city lights of Redwood City from the kitchen window
over her kitchen sink. Because our large trees already cover most of this
view, it appears that in a relatively short time this view will be totally
obstructed anyway from the natural growth of these trees.
We have tried to work with our neighbor, Mrs. Umland, at 1600 Sebastian
Drive, but she has refused to even discuss the matter with us. On June 25,
2002 we requested a meeting to tryto work out these issues. On June 26,
2002 she responded with a request to meet with us and with several of our
neighbors to discuss these issues collectively. She then called us on lwre 27,
2002leaving a message that there vlas no need to get together because there
was nothing further to discuss. We have an audiotape and transcript of these
two messages available.
We have worked on this project in good faith. We have uomplied with the
Burlingame planning code, and we are sensitive to the issue of view
obstruction. We have lowered the plate height of the second story addition
to seven feet and dropped the ridge of the roof by flattening the rooftop. We
have tried to locate the second story away from the front of the house to
minimize the visual impact from the sheet, but not too far back, since that
would adversely impact the views of our neighbors at2847 Arguello Drive.
As noted above we also changed the roof design from a gable to a hip in the
front and back to further minimize obstruction of views. We are more than
willing to work with a certified arborist and our neighbors to devise a
workable plan to trim our trees to enhance the views of the Cotters and l\4rs.
Umland. We believe that this would offset any obstruction of views that the
proposed second story addition would cause. We respectfully request that
the Burlingame City Council review the proposed project and approve tire
plans as submitted.
We would like to proceed with these plans in order to accommodate our
aging parents who plan to live in our home. Our existing floor plan and
fooprint do not allow for a workable single story addition.
Sincerely,
Dr* vt tl^rlryut,
RECEIVID
JUL 2 5 ZOO2
CiTY OI BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT
Dean R. Hirabayashi Debra
The City of Burlingame
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Iuly Z,20A2
Dean and Debbie t{irabayashi
2843 Arguello Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
CITY HALL 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 94OIO-3997
TEL: (650)558-7250
F,A,X (650) 696-3790
AttheCityCouncilmeetingofJuly l,2002,theCouncilscheduledanappealhearingonyourprojectat
2843 Arguello Drive, zonedR-1. A public hearing will be held on August 5, 2002 at7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA.
We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me ifyou have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MIWs
APPIIIRCC.acc
c:Noemi K. Avram, architect
City Clerk
DearI\Ai. and Mrs. Hirabayashi,
IIONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COIJNCIL:
PLEASE SCHEDT]LE A PUBLIC HEARING
FOR 2843 ARGUELLO DRIVE FOR THE
AUGUST 5, 2OO2 COIINCIL MEETING.
RESPEC?FULLY SUBMITTED,
ANN MUSSO, CITY CLERK
RECflYEDCity Council
City of Burlingame
Burlingame, CA 94010
July l, 2002
JUL 1 Zr,rJL RECEIVE D
JUL - 7 Zl/l,Z
t'll^t^i^ir'f tJl8i"
ClIycry 81ffif,,fl6i,^?F
To whom it may concern:
We request to appeal the decision made by the Planning Cornmission on
June 24,2002 regarding our home at2843 Arguello Drive, Burlingame.
Sincerely,
Dean R Hirabayashi
Debra
i
Dr^
^
1)r4'obo./4-L,'
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 24, 2002
to this permit; 2) tbat any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architecfural feafures or
changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of the City
Engineer'sandRecyclingSpecialisfsMarch ll,2002,memosshallbemet;4)thattheprojectshallcomply
with the proposed demolition and recycling ordinance recentlyapproved by the City Council;
5) that prior to scheduling the inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide height; 6) that prior to scheduling the inspection, the project
certification that thearchitect, engineer or professional shall provide
architectural details window locations and bays are built as on the approved plans; ifthere is
no licensed
certification
and note
has been
involved in the project, the
ofperjury; 7) that prior to final
or contractor shall the
PlanningDepartment inspect
ofthe architectural details (trim window type, etc.) to theproject
to the approved Planrling plans; and 8) that the shall meet all
the of the California Building Code Fire Code, 1998 amendedbythe
comment: notedthat no reference to the type being used,waspointed
the window detail was on the plans as wood clad,mold and that condition #1
required all windows to be true light.
ChairKeighran called vote on the motion to approve the windows are stucco mold. The
motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent)procedures were advised. This item
concluded at 7:35 p.m.
4, 2843 ARGUELLO DRIVE _ ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (NOEMI K. AVRAM,
AIA, GUMBINGER AVRAM ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DEAN HIRABAYASHI,
PROPER TY owNER) (21 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:CATHERTNE
Reference staffreport,6.24.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Eight conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no
questions of staffby the Commission
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Noemi Awam, architect, and Mr. and Mrs. Hirabayashi,
property owners, were present to answer questions. Applicant presented revised drawings to reflect the
changes suggested by the Planning Commission. Changed the roof ends from a gable to a hip to address
neighbor's view concerns. Noted that story poles were installed on June 18, 2002.
Commissioners comments: why didn't you put a window on the left elevation? Applicant stated that they
consideredputting awindow, but felt thatputtingmorewindows inthe closet space wouldbe detrimental to
the use of the space and items stored; houses too close together; did you have the opportunity to view the
story pole's from neighbor's house? No. Had opportunity to meet with neighbors and saw that the house on
1600 Sebastian's view will be blocked by the addition; have you considered lowering the roofline?
Applicant noted that they have been working on this project for over one year; lowered the plate height to
7'-0", hipped the roof looked at a variety ofplacement arrangements for second floor. Commissioner noted
that views at 1600 Sebastian will be blocked; a portion of the view will be blocked by the existing trees on
the project site and the new addition will also block part of the view; considered lowering first floor?
Applicant stated that the homeowner was willing to pay to have trees trimmed to increase neighbor's view
City
4
Citt of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 24, 2002
and that lowering the first floor would require a complete reconstnrction. Blocking views is the issue here,
greatjob of designing the house, unfortunately it stands in front ofthe neighbor's window. Applicant noted
that they tried a first floor addition, but due to setbacks, lot coverage, etc., the addition didn't work. There
were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Auran noted that he visited 2847,2849 Arguello, 1600 Sebastian, and 1600 Sebastian will have the
biggest view blockage; trees do take np 60-65% of the view and they are taller than the addition, addition
blocks 35olo, seems view could be restored by trimming trees and reducing the impact of addition; house at
1600 Sebastian also has distant views from windows on the other sides of the house, but seems that there is
more to be done, so move to deny without prejudice this project. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Comment on the motion: Asked if a regulartree-trimming program with no changes to design would work;
not necessarily, but need to work with neigtrbors. The applicants have tried to find solutions, would be
willing to consider a compromise on setbacks and lot coverage, designing to protect views; the community
wants them to have an addition, but views are a priority, would be open to a lot coverage variance.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a
voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:58 p.m.
5. 148 COSTA RICA - ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR FOR A SECOND
STORY ADD REYES, STEWART ASSOCIATES,AND ARCHITECT;
LARRY AND STENGER, PROPERTY OWNERS) (54 PROJECT PLANNER:
report, 6.24.02,with attachments. CP presented the report, reviewed and
staff Noted thatthe Commission had a Susie Cvitkovic atl44 Costa at
Eight conditions were suggested Commissioner asked different
on the house, show cement siding,with plans and what about Staffreferred
siding question to the applicant.
Chair Keighran opened the John Stewart, Stewart I Laurel Street, was
present to answer quustions.out that received neighbor's letter will abide by the City's
construction hours. Will
porch and be horizontal.
the house from the inside and all siding match existing at the front
that homeowners have replaced some already, but would be
willing to replace true divided light if PC requires.
Susie Cvitkovic, I Rica Avenue, spoke regarding the proj with new materials not
being existing materials. Windows on her side large and not true divided light
windows.to request true divided light windows on Concerned about the side setback.
Would like a property survey, to insure that the adheres to the setback requirements.
Already deck offthe rear of the house. Addition the light in her kitchen and living
room.already has five bedrooms on a small lot.of updating house, but better to update
and make it more livable rather than more. Applicant noted that he was surprised
new things were being brought up at this meeting;Have nineteen signafures from residents
supporting addition. Trying to improve on the
owner's mother. There \ryere no further comments
addition complete some time ago by the property
the floor and the public hearing was.closed.
5
ftarl^.{-
$6r. d
.t
June 6, 2002
2834 Arguello Drive
RECEI ED
JUN 1 0 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Burlingame Planning Commission
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Sir or Madam:
We wish to express our concem for the 2nd story home plans at2%3 Arguello Drive in Burlingame.
We live across the street and think that the house will not fit in to our neighborhood. When we moved
here years ago, we thought about adding a 2nd story but dkl not want to make neighbots upset and
change view of street
Thank you,
Vivian Lee
Head of Planning Department,
City ofBurlingame,
501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, CA 94010.
Dear Sir,
u U irii fu+U}* t c.4T i-c n'. H EC r I y Eir
AFTER P'IEPARA t iO$
OF STAFT ftIFOF.-T
Kwok To & Rosario Wong,
2838 Arguello Drive,
Burlingame, CA 94010.
Jnne 15,2002.
RECEIVEM
JUN 1 I 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING OE P-
Re: 2843 Arguello Drive :
Thank you very much for letting us know that the owner of 2843 Arguellb Drive has applied for
design review and hillside area construction permit. However, we are much upset by the news.
On one side of our property, located uphill from us, is already the two-story house of 1600
Sebastian Drive. If the owners of 2843 Arguello Drive add a second story to their house, it will
further deprive us of sunlight and view, and overshadow our house. Also, it will affect the
marketability of our property. We would prefer tbat2843 Arguello Drive remain a one-story
house- However, if the City allows them to add, we strongly request that the total height ofthe
reconstructed2843 Arguello Drive not to exceed the total height of 2847 Arguello Drive. We
hope that you will understand our difficult situation and take our suggestion into consideration.
Thark you very much, and hope our grievances will be heard by you.
Yours sincerely,
Kwok To Wong Rosario Wong
,f*'ff^
Item# $
Action Calendar
PROJECT LOCATION
2843 Arguello Drive
t,
J
1I
Item #
Action Calendar
City of Burlingame
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit
for a First and Second Story Addition
Address: 2843 Arguello Drive Meeting Datez 6124102
Request: Design review and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story addition at2843 Arguello Drive,
zoned R-l (C.S. 25.28.040)
Property Owner: Dean Hirabayashi
ApplicanUArchitect: Noemi K. Avram, AIA, Gumbinger Avram Architects APN: 025-034-140
General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential LotArea:8,586 SF
Date Submitted: May 16,2002 Zoning: R-l
CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class I - (e) additions to existing structures
provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50%o of the floor area of the structures before theaddition. ;
Summary: The applicant is requesting design review and a hillside area construction permit for a first and second story
addition at 2843 Arguello Drive, zoned R- I . The existing house is a single story structure with an attached garage totaling
2,639 SF in floor area (0.30 FAR). The first floor addition includes enlarging the main living level at the rear and along thi
right side of the house as well as extending the existing rear and side yard deck and ctrnstructing trellises over the deck off of
the proposed family room and great room. The proposal also includes the addition of a iigZ Sn second floor that would add a
master bedroom and bathroom, as well as an additional bedroom and bathroom The total floor area of the remodeled house
wouldincreaseto3,T3l SF(0.43FAR),where3,848SF(0.44FAR)isthemaximumallowed. Theattachedgarageprovides
two covered parking spaces 20' x20', and meets the parking requirement for this five bedroom house.
* Existing n on-conforming
This project meets all code requirements.
PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS
Front: lstflr
2ndflr
No change
43'
16'-6"
N/A
I5'-0" or block average
20'-o"
Side (lefi):7' (new stairs off
of(e) deck)
l0'-9"7',
Side@ght):No change *5',- I 1"7',
Rear: lstflr
2ndflr
No change
3l'15'-7"
N/A
l5'-0"
20'-0"
LOT
COYERAGE:
38.3% (3,289 SF)32.8% (2,820 SF)40% (3,434 SF)
FAR:3,731 SFi
0.43 FAR
2,639 SFI
O.3O FAR
3,848 SF/
0.44 FAR
PARKING:No change 2 covered (19'x 20')+
I uncovered
2 covered (20'x20')+
I uncovered
HEIGHT:24',-6"16'-6"21/z stoies 30' whichever is less
DH ENV:Meets Requirement Meets Requirement See Code
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2843 Arguello Drive
Staff Comments: See attached. None of the changes made since the Junel0,2002 design review study meeting
affect the criteria listed in the above table.
June 10, 2002 Design Review Study Meeting: On June 10,2002,the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed
first and second story additionat2S43 Arguello Drive. The Commission had the following comments and concerns:. concemed with view blockage, story poles with mesh between them need to be installed to show outline of
addition;
o addition would look better if it is moved back, would be less prominent at the front of the house;o concemed with the number of skylights at the front of the house, should reduce number;o would like to see a tree protection plan;
' concemed with the semi-circular windows on the front and rear elevations, they are not consistent with the
architecfure, architect should re-evaluate use of these windows; and
' concemed with blank wall on west elevationuand suggested adding a window in the closet.
The applicant submitted revised plans and a memo date stamped June 14,2002, in response to the planning
Commission comments at the June 10, 2002,design review study meeting. The plans have bien revised as follows:o the number of skylights on the front elevation have been changed from three to two;o the semi-circular windows on the front and rear second story elevatioilS have been eliminated; ando the roofplan has been reconfigured and the front and rear second floor roofhas been changed from a gable to a
hip roof.
In the applicant's response memo the applicant also states that the property owners will install story poles reflecting
the revised proposal, and a story pole plan is attached for reference. The addition has not been *or.d buck because
moving it back would block the adjacent neighbor's view. Tree protection plan measures will be included on the
plan at the time of building permit submittal. There is already a window in the master bedroom closet, adding a
window on the west side would make the closet almost unusable and would increase the heat due to the orientation.
Please see the applicant's memo dated June 14, 2002 (attached) for additional information.
Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a hillside area construction permit by the
Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distant views of nearby
properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit
(Code Sec.25.61.060).
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20,1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative-action should
be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated.
At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered:
2
I
Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2843 Arguello Drive
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June
14,2002, Sheets A1-l through A3-2 site plan, floor plans and building elevations, and that the two skylights
on the front of the house shall be tinted to reduce night glare, the tint shall be approved by the Planning
Department prior to issuance of the building permit;
that any changes to the size or envelope ofthe basement, first or second floors, which would include adding
or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and
meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a
demolition permit;
4. that the conditions ofthe Recycling Specialist's and the City Engineer's May l3,20}2memos shall be met;
5. thatpriorto scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height ofthe roofridge
and provide certification of that height;
that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional
shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are
built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the
property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury;
thatpriorto final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance ofthe architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved
Planning and Building plans; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as
amended by the City of Burlingame.
Catherine Keylon
Planner
c:Noemi K. Avram, AIA, Gumbinger Avram Architects, applicant/architect
2.
J
6
7
8
3
ROUTING FORM
DATE:May 13,2007
_V_City Engineer
_Chief Building Official
_Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_Citv Attorney
TO:
FROM: Planning Staff
Request for design review and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story
addition at2843 Arguello Drive, zoned R-1, APN: A?.5-034-140.
STAFF REVIEW:13,z00z
SUBJECT:
0 ,W a"*-y ,M L- P*^T:! + "cd^-
@ {*"-!u ryr"{
(
"//'1'''"
?agz,,a;h-tL rr.f N q
=tL l"t fr.J nn, /r./y*-l fu-))
-lL
/lh'
4J A-1";/L-Al 6M*"*4 d\^'+ 4{4-
-{L HfuS Prrl
6 +e.
Reviewed By:V*Date of Comments:1/
I
4-
(J-: -,-"* [
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May L3,7002
TO:_City Engineer
_Chief Building Offfcial
Fire Marshal
-y' Recycling Specialist
_S.. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
13,2007
FROM: Planning Staff
STAFF REVIEW;
Request for design review and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story
addition at 2843 Arguello Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 025-034-140.
hgp(i.*^,& 6t"$t b.rbrn,*'\ (L \*'t'4<- ?.r}r-,--^";
?f^"^ .'q4 k2q &.p*;f f* {"
*A D",-^l-+r",-, )fuo+n*6q dr €"rr^;+lr\
"-.U^U^ol-47vL-&*.:
*,L,!t{-\^*L41,^t'rX t'- UIl-,t ,t;LL b''-
-Vt*,;,d-[L
Reviewed By:Date of Comments:I o
?
rS'
SUB}ECT:
Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chairman Keighran opened the public comment. Noemi Avram, Gumbinger Avram Associates, architect,
and Mr. and Mrs. Hirabayashi, property owners, were present to answer questions, architect noted that there
are no exceptions to the code, worked on this project for I Yz. years, have talked to and incorporated
neighbor's comments. Commissioner expressed a concem with the semi-circular 'wagon wheel' windows
on the front and rear elevations noting that they are not consistent with the architecture; architect noted that
these windows were used to draw in as muih light as possible into the rooms, house is presently dark.
Commissioner also noted a concem with blank wall on west elevation and suggest adding a window in the
closet; architect pointed out that the windows were eliminated from this wall to respect the neighbor,s
privacy, will consider adding a window in the closet.
Further discussion: concerned with view blockage, would like to see storypoles installed, there are alarge
number of windows on the east elevation; architect noted that the two smaller windows are located high off
the floor, the window to the left is above a bathtub, and the window to the far left is set back quite a distance
from the side property line. Architect noted that the original design had the bedrooms on the.ight ria. ofthe
house, but decided to flip the floor plan to address the neighbor's concern with privacy, proposed addition is
only 6'-8" above the existing roof,24'-0" in height were 30'-0" is allowed, flattened roof in the middle to
protect the neighbor's view, front of house is 45' from the curb, using ':'-0" plateheight on second story,
studied placement of addition to minimize the mass and bulk, tried to concentrate the bulk in the center of
the house, if the neighbors wants we could revise roof at rear from gable to hip, could also eliminate semi-
circular windows. Commissioner asked if three skylights are needed at the front of the house; architect
noted that the entrance is very dark, would like to at least have two skylights. Property ownernoted that the
intent of the addition is for their elderly parents to move in with them, three bedrooms will not be enough,
discussed the addition with the neighbors, most impacted will be the uphill neighbor, noted that the east
elevation drawing showing the relationship between the project house and neighbor will be corrected,
understands neighbor's request to change roof at rear from gable to hip.
Ann Marie Umland, 1600 Sebastian Drive, and John Roman, 2839 Arguello Drive, expressed concerns with
the consistency with the neighborhood, will loose view since house will be wider and taller, addition at1847
Arguello Drive fits in well with the neighborhood, no one lost their view, addition was atrear,not opposed
to an addition, need to look at how to provide space but not at the expense of others, concerned with loss of
privacy, there will be a height disparity with other houses on the block, concerned with soils and foundation
issues, was not approached by applicant regarding this project.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission had the following concems about the proposed project and asked the applicant to address these
items on the revised plans:
concerned with view blockage, story poles with mesh between them need to be installed to show
outline of addition;
addition would look better if it is moved back, would be less prominent at the front of the house;
7
a
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 10, 2002
10. 2843 ARGUELLO DRIVE _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (NOEMI K.
AVRAM, AIA, GL]MBINGER AVRAM ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DEAN
HIRABAYASHI. PROPERTY OWNER) (21 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
' City of Burlingarne Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 10, 2002
. concerned with the number of skylights at the front of the house, should reduce number;. would like to see a tree protection plan;
' concerned with the semi-circular windows on the front and rear elevations, they are not consistent
with the architecture, architect should re-evaluate use of these windows; ando concerned with blank wall on west elevation and suggest adding a window in the closet.
Commissioner noted that he sees the reason for placing the addition where it is proposed, it's placed in a way
to not block views from2847 Arguello Drive, agree that storypoles are needed to determine ifviews will be
blocked from neighbors' houses, suggest neighbors provide pictures from inside their houses after story
poles are installed; this is a straight forward solution, addition is not excessive.
C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar. This motion was seconded
by C. Auran. i
Comment on motion: architect should also look at revising the roof at the rear of the house from gableto hip
configuration
Chairman Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to place thisTtem on the regular action calendar
when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at l0:55 p.m.
8
,i#fr!:ffiq.rqiw&@
,%re
-
GUMBINGER AVRAM
ARCHITECTS
--
ow rasr, nno rrrenue, Sune suu
San Mateo, CA 94401-4083
Telephone: 650/579-0995
Facsimile: 650/579-1402--
!-7
MEMO
The following is a response to the Commission's concems expressd at the Planning
Commission Study Session of Monday June 10h, 2OO2
Tor Catherine Keylon & City ofBwlingame Planning Connnission
Cc Dr. and Mrs. Hirabayashi
Fhorn NoemiK. Avram, AlA, GumbingerAvraln Architects
RE 2843 Arguello Drive -Zoned R-l
Concern with view blockage, story poles with rnesh between them need to be
installed to show outline addition
Property owners have already engaged a Licensed General Contractor, who will
installstory poles on Tuesday Jure i8m, 02. Attached you will find the Story Pole
Plan.
Addition would look better if it is npved back, would be less prominent at the front
of the house. Another Commissioner noted that he sees the reason for placing
the addition where it is placed to not block views trom2847 Arguello Drive.
Moving the Second floor addition to the back would indeed block the adjacent
neighbo/s views.
Concerned with the number of slq/ights at the front of the house, should reduce
the number.
a
a
o
We have reduoed the number of proposed skylights fom three to two at the front
ofthe house.
Would like to see a tree protection plan.
We will incorporate the pertinent notes at the time of submittal for Building Permit
to provide for tree protec{ion plan.
RECEIVED
JUN 1 4 ?AO?
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
1
Paul J. Gumbinsd, FAIA
Principal
Noemi K. Arram, AIA
Principal
o
a
Concerned with the semi+ircular windows on the front and rear elevations, they
are not consistent with the arehitecture, architect should r+evaluate use of these
windor,rls
We have eliminated the semi-circular windovrrs from both; front and rear
elevations.
Concerned with blank wall on west elevation and suggest adding a window in the
closet.
The closet in the master bedroom already has a window on the front (north)
elevation. Another window on the West Side would make the closet almost
unusable, in addition to heat gain due to orientation.
Comment on motion: architect should also look at revising the roof at the rear of
the house from gable to hip configuration.
We have reconfigured the roof ftom gable to hip both; at the front and at the rear
elevations
Please note that the composite east elevation that showed 2843 and 2lA7 Arguello
together, will not be part of this r+submittal. lt was never our intention to mislead the
Commissioners, but rather it is an elevation difficult to produce. 28/3 Arguello's
house is not parallelto the Property Line they share wthz84;T Arguello, nor is it tris
last one parallel to the Property Line either. Therefore, the cornposite east elevation
showing both 2M3 as trrell as 2847 could be correcfly drawn from three different
vantage points.
We believe that the eredion of tre Story Poles with mesh betvveen them will truly
show that the addition fits with the proportions of the house, the neighbors and the
neighborhood.
RECEIV[[_r
JUN 1 4 iti-i;1t
''llf^i-i^iJHI;i,,
2
FAx (65C' 5+&O2re (650) *!fr
Pd?CI-{IECTS
2'-6"r2'-0'
_t
c--
-l l'b
I-+
9'-8'
17'-O"
I
17'-O'
/r/
r 7'-0"
/t/
I
o
e-
I:
17'-O"
I
9'-10'
ts
7'-O"
+144.5'
RIDGE HI-
l9'-10'
----t
SLEE.-T:IT1
19'-11 t/2"
17'-O'
Hh
sf I
t7'-o"
I
F
--+
e-
,//
e-
20'
.SLOPE
'4:12 HT
-'
-.l
I
@
I
i t-.-TT
I
I
7'-O"t7'-o"
r9'-0'r2'-5'
---+
JUN 1 4 700?
J
REC EI
NOIE: ALL HEIGHTS MEASURED
FROM FINISH FIRST FLOOR
ELEVAION, F.F.E.= 124.30'
NORIH
. POLE
++++++++tt{+r NETTING
HIRABAYASHI RESIDENCE
28+5 ARGUEI,.LO DRIVE BURTINGAIIE, CA 9IOIO
STORY POLE PLAN
SCALE: I /8"=1'-O"
N
T
I
I
I
I
HFI
ls$
e-
i
I
sienI tsy: ul I r ur 6uFLllYuAlrE rLAl\lvJ.lvui of,u ()=o or=u,BYr - au'vc u.+e^il,r 6Ys ure
City Btulin8arDcPlanrringDepartrwu SD|PrimmscRord P(650)J58-?250 F(650) 695-3190 www.burlinqame-or$
APPLICATION TO TITE PLANNING COIVIMISSION
Tvpl u of applicadon: Design Rcview- cooditional use Permit variance_
Special Pcrmit_ Othcr_Parcel
ect addrees 2843 ,qRGU€LLI D<IVE:
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
,< Avier4i,{&(4 Narnc:)no^ A; rab o.
Ad&css-- 2&43 7;4.GO€ LLa b&
&d&:citve4kl€ C4 q UclO
aso 51 -o1q5 Phogc .{r t
(s{O -33 L
(0:,- l+oL 0 (Dq - otb
ytpfll-/.+/4
ProJ
3{eL-33
AaC*lrucd
Address: @ e. frteD nd€# 3@
5;4,lv t447m (A?qqo/Please indicatc wtth an aster{sk *
tbe contact persou for this'project.(w):bTc 57"r -I
6{0 sl?- t(o2
Secoxib .Sro/er ADD lT/ot /
YTVSIGNATIIRE: I hereby ccrti& under penalty of pcrjury that thc infonnation
herein is tnre and corect to the best of my knowledge and belief.s/z/ozsignahre:
ktow about tbe application and hcrcby authorize tbc abovc applicant 16 5u[rni1 this
to the Planning Commis.sion
a.L Date:Ay I jO, tPo >
submitted:""""'*"'ffiED
MAY E*^r2002
t'l'..f,[*?,V8'JUFf *'
owner's si .LA^ L Ll^.l)
Date
a-s L,/
Il-r^.
RECEIVED
MAY - 8 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
May 8,2002
To the Planning Commission:
We are trying to remodel ow house in order to allow us to take care of Dean's parents.
They are now 87 and 85 years old, and we would like them to move in with us. Since we
have a l3-year-old daughter and a lO-year-old son, we need additional space to
accommodate six people in our home, which currently has three bedrooms.
The process started over a year ago. We have been through many sets of plans, tying to
balance our needs with the concerns of our neighbors. Out of consideration we have
spoken with all of our immediate neighbors to get their input and *reir concens.
We moved the front of the upstairs addition toward the back because of aesthetic
concerns of our neighbors directly ilcross the street.
Our preference was to have both upstairs bedrooms facing the view of the San Francisco
Bay. After discussing our plans with our downhill neighbors, we moved the master
bedroom toward the uphill back comer of the addition to allow them more privacy. They
had objected to an earlier design that had both upstairs bedrooms facing their house.
ln order to minimize the obstruction of views of our uphill neighbors, we lowered the
plate height of the second story to seven feet. In addition, we lowered the roof height by
an additional foot by flattening a portion of the roof.
In fact, our proposed addition is very similar in design to otr uphill neighbors' recent
second story addition.
We have tried to do everything possible to meet the concerns of our neighbors. We are
looking forward to working with the Planning Commission to get these plans approved.
Sincerely,,
Lo,- Z/",o./,"
Dean and Debra
2843 Arguello Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
(,-.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
5O1 PRIMROSE BOAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94O.IO
TEL: (650) 558-7250
2843 ARGTIELIO DRIVE
Mailed Lfune l-4 , 2OO2
(Please refer to other side)
A copy of the
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising onl
described
at or prior
Property
tenants
558-72s0.
Margaret
City Planner
PU
Application for design review andhillside area construction permit for afirst and second story aL 28{3 ArguelloDrive, zoned R-1. (Aptt: 025_034_140)
The City of Burlingame ptanning
Commission announces the folJ_owing publichearing on Monday, ilune 24, 2002 at 7:00P.M. i-n tfre-E$ Hal1 Council Chamberslocated at 501 primrose Road, Burlingame,California.
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
Temple Sholom
Peninsula
1555 Sebastian DrBurlingama ,.,a 9401O
be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
limited tb
blic hearing,
to tlru city
their
call (650)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CE
Ca L t r a l{ f a
(Please refer to other side)
RESOLUTTON AppROyING CATEGORTCAL EXBMPTION,
DESIGN REYIEW AI\D HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for_dggig4
review and hillside area construction permit for a first and second story addition at 2843 Arguello Drive.
zoned R-1. Dean R. and D.J. Hirabayashi Trs.. propertv owners. APN: 025-034-140;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City ofBurlingame on June
24.2002 at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing; '
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
l. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received
and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set
forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CE(iA Article
I 9. Categorically Exempt per Section: I 5303 - Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class I - (e)
additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase ofmore than 50% ofthe floor area of
the structures before the addition
2. Said design review and hillside area construction permit are approved, subject to the conditions
set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review andhillside area construction permit
are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy ofthis resolution be recorded in the ollicial records of
the County of San Mateo.
CHAIRMAN
I, Ralph Osterling, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
certiff that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission held on the 24th day of June , 2002 ,by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
EXIilBIT IIAI'
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, design review and hillside area construction
permit.
2843 Arguello Drive
effective JuIy 1,2002
I that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Departrnent
date stamped June 14,2002, Sheets Al-l throu gh A3-2 site plan, floor plans and building
elevations, and that the two skylights on the front of the house shall be tinted to reduce night
glare, the tint shall be approved by the,Planning Department prior to issuance of the building
permit;
that any changes to the size or envelope ofthe basement, first or second floors, which would
include addrrig or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to-design review;
that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projicts to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a strucfure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist's and the City Engineer's May B,2AOz
memos shall be met;
that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height;
that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no
Iicensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide
the certification underpenalty of perjury;
that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staffwill inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; and
that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
2.
3.
4
5
6.
7
8
Jnne 13,2002
Planning Commission
City Of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, Ca. 94010
Re: 2843 Arguello Dr. Remodeling Plans
I
Dear Commissioners:
We are the owner of 2847 Arguello Dr. Our home is on the up-slope side of the
proposed project. We would like you to come to our home to take a look at our
view once the story poles are in place. Until the story poles are in place it is ahnost
impossible to tell how we may or may not be impacted. We have some questions
about the east elevation drawing that was submitted by the architect. We feel that
the story poles will clarifo any misunderstandings that we have.
Please feel free to call me at 650-259-9303. I look forward to seeing you.
Sincerely,
Mary Cotter
Neil Cotter
REC EIVED
JUN 1 4 ?OO?
CITY OT BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT
07/@A/@@ LZz@@A P.O@1
06-10-02
UOMMUN ICATION RECEIVEG
AFTER PREPARAI'ION
OF SlAFF REPOF-TPlanning Commission
City of Burlingarne
501 Primrose Road
Bulingame, Ca. 94010
JUN 1 0 2002
RE: 2843 Arguello Drive- Remodeling Plans
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Dear Commissioners,
We are the owners of 2847 Arguello Dr. It is our home ttrat is pictured as the
neighboring house. We do have some concerns about the existing plans for our
neighbors addition. We have a srrggestion to mal(e that we b-elieve will be helpful.
On the current plans they have gables. We feel ttrat if they use a hip instead of
gables flris will help reduce the blockage of our view. It will also gct of the big wall
in front, thus making the home blend into the neighborhood better.
We are not completely opposed to our ncighbor adding to their home. We do want
to protect our view and believe that our suggestion would be helpful. lf ou
suggestion is accepted we would likc to see the changes made before any story
poles may be ptrt into place- We realize that family needs change and wc want to -
work together with our neighbors so that thcy may enjoy the benefit of an expanded
homc.
RECEIVED
Thank You
--/f4azd- {miA-M
Neil Couer
Mary Cotter
f
FROM :PI-ONE NO. :PZL
June8,20O2
Burllngnrrc Pbrning Commission
501 Primme Road
8uilnOane, CA9f010
cui"i;i,,r-.;, -,,-. i ;--it iitu[lvEtl
AFTER PREPASAIISN
,,. -. OF$TAFF
:
BEFoSri
Dear Sir or Madam:
We vuish b expre$s orrr Goncrom for the 2nd 6tory home plans at 2843 Arguello Drive in Burlingnme.
We lire across hG Et Eet and 0rink that the hquse will not fit in to our ne[hborhood. When ue moved
tlse years ago, Yvc Upught about addirp a 2nd story but did not want to make neighbors up-t and
cftsnge vbn, of sbeet.
Ttunk you,
Wien Lee
2E34 Arguelb Drive
RECEIVED
JUN - 6 ?OO?
CITY OF BU RLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Gty of Budingame Planning Depaftment
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
RE: 2843 Aryuello Drive
ApplicaUon for construction permit
Parcel #025-034-140
ax-rl@
Ann Marie Umland
1@0 SebasUan Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Commissiorrers:
I will be at the planning ommission meeting on June 10, 2002. Howaner, I find it difficult
to express myself at that time.
I am very unhappy with the possibility of the approval of this onstruct'rfi.- Hrst, and foremost,
I will be robbed of my moming sunrise and the evening sunset. I have lived in my home ficr
30 years ard have enjoyed every minute of it. I enjoy it more so now, as I am a reent widow
ard that first crtp of offee looking out my kitcfren wirdow rnakes nry day. In the winter, the
view 's outstanding. I can see diftrent shade of douds and sky. When it is old enough to
snow, I can see the snow on the nountain tops. In the wenirg, I can enjoy the lights of the
city and see the planes as they zero in for landing. This will be all gone if the ptans are approved
as presented to the commission. I totally object to this "huge" onstruction that is being planned
for 2843 Arguello Drive, Burlingame. I know that Burlingame has an ordinane 1388 2 as of
March 6, f989 that deals with Ute obsEuction of distant vievrls from habitable areas within a
drvelling unit. I pray that my honre qmlifies as my vierrv fronr my home will be stolen from me.
I am not adverse to their desire to add to their home. But, I do feel that not only my @ncems
but the @ncems of dher neighbors have been put aside. We all live in this area because of the
view rnade pcsiUe by ttte original design of the drrvellings. Our honres are our casdes and we al!
strive b keep them up so as to rnaintain the dpracter of our neighborhood.
Thank you for reading my letter. This situaUon of my view means a great deal b me. Please
cal! nre (650-692-3561) if you have any questiors.
Respedtully,
June 5, 2002
COME{U$I'CATION R ECT iVE$
AFTER PREPARAI''OiI
oF sTc$F R[PoB,E' - .,
REC E IVE D
JUN - 7 2A02
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
2t35 nrsrrloDriw
BudingsEc, CA 94Ol0
.!uas 7,20@
CityofBurtingero
PlaooiasCommbsion
501PriruoseRood
BrsfiqSilDe, CA 94010
IXar Plaaniog CooEicdouq
Reeadfus 2t43 Armrdlo Driv;, fled be advlsEd drm I offgg o a bigh tuogto' addiliJonbins htilt on tis suBF I hvd ;ud E,hone f.r-].mffii [eri*ru oDe+!oF/ homsoE ottr bhck dd b q gu sppt- I d$ d0 en-ud rilffiv Edghbds vi6rs e,d,dtnav. esld D th Hor arsfu hGsdms i qoutdffi uffii ieil;"#srydditimbeamurrcdtytedry.-- E4' '
Sdoporlos
c0MrtauN |C$tot{ RECE|yEF
AFTER PftEPARANON'
0F STAFF REP0BI
RECEIVED
JUN 1 O ZOA?.
CITY OF BURTINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Id Ndas:62 zzzz Lo .unf : .ON XUI HOdl
Head of Planning Department,
City of Burlingame,
501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, CA 94010.
Dear Sir,
CI]MfU I.}N I CATION,RECEIVEts
AFTER PREPARAIION
OF E'AFF RIPOPr,
Re: 2843 Arguello Drive
Item /i10- 2843 Arguello Drive
06.10.02 PC Mtg.
Kwok To & Rosario Wong,
2838 Arguello Drive,
Burlingame, CA 94010.
June 1,2002.
Thank you very much for letting us know that the owner of 2843 Arguello Drive has applied for
design review and hillside area construction permit. However, we are much upset by the news.
On one side of our property, located uphill from us, is already the two-story house of 1600
Sebastian Drive. Ifthe owners of 2843 Arguello Drive add a second story to their house, it will
further deprive us of sunlight and view, and overshadow our house. Also, it will affect the
marketability of our property. We would prefer that2843 Arguello Drive remain a one-story
house. However, if the City allows them to add, we strongly request that the total height ofthe
reconstructed2&43 Arguello Drive not to exceed the total height of 2847 Arguello Drive. We
hope that you will understand our difficult situation and take our suggestion into consideration.
Thank you very much, and hope our grievances will be heard by you.
Yows sincerely,
Wong Rosario Wong
b*r*,.
n*u*':Drnro**r,rl.;jrf:"
4^
,. ,.)
,ar"*t
"*p.:.?
Item /110
2843 Aruello Drive
PC Mtg. 06.10.02
2839 Arguello Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
UO MM UN ICATION RECEIVEE
AFTER PREPARATION
OF STAFF R.EPOF.T
JUN - 6 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
June 5,2002
Planning Commission
Crty Of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA%010
Re: 2843 Arguello Drive- Remodeling Plans
Dear Commissioners:
As owners of 2839 Arguello Drive, we are in a very uncomfortable but necessary position of registering our
objections to the proposed 2'" story addition and home expansion plans submitted by our nextdoor
neighbors at2%3 Arguello Drive. We expressed our initial@ncems to Dr. & Mrs. Hirabayashi. We also
asked to see an updated set of plans and offered to assist in bringing the neighbors together. We eventually
needed to view the plans at the Planning Department.
Our home is located on the hillside of Mills Canyon. Our home location, like our neighbors, cunenfiy
provides beautiful views and considerable privacy based on tfre original development of the hillside. After
reviewing the proposed plans, our strongest objections and concems consist of the following:
1. Loss Of Privacy - The proposed set of plans include adding a 2d-story level consisting of two
bedrooms and one bathroom. This, in combination with plans to expand the first floor, call for
numerous windows to be added which we believe are excessive and will intrude on our privacy
based on their location. We reside directly below 2&43 Arguello and do not want our existing
privacy invaded by others who would have the ability to peer down on us.
2. Height Dispanty - The original developers of Mills Estates built Arguello Drive hillside homes with
a wonderfulstepping effect that allovra for all residents to enjoy Mills Canyon, bay views and opensky. Previous homeowners permitted to remodel in this area have respected ttris neighborhbod
appeal and subsequenUy built much lorler additions or did not increase the building height at all
(i.e.: 2848 Arguello &2821Tiburon Drtve). This was a major relief to the sunounding homeowners.
We are concemed the proposed height for tre 2d story iOOitirn will adversely impad he existing
stepping effect of our home nextdoor if these plans are not redesigned.
3. Soil & Foundation Concem - We will be ttre first to acknoMedge that we are not soilengineers.
Horever, we are very concemed that prevbus and existing soil movement at this tocation will be
exacerbated ftom the additional weight and consbuction activity created by a rernodeling project of
this size. A previously installed retaining wall at 2&43 Arguello does not appear to nave stoppit tne
sliding of a property line bnce adjacent to our home. An example of this slide is that our side gate
must be cut and reduced in size again bebre it can open and close properly. Regardless of the
final remodeling plans, we request that soil tests be conducted to identiff and repair any problems
since Burlingame city records list previous slirie problems at this locaton.
We would like to emphasize that we are not completely opposed to our good neighbors adding to treir
home. Hoitrever, we do request they take the sunounding neighbors'vianvs, privacy and tre comOined effort
to maintiain the neighborhood look and feel into serious mnsideration when revising their plans. We are
confident that a solution can be obhined and everyone can continue to eniry his or her homes for years to
@me.
We request the Burlingame Planning Commission take into consideration our objections and concems listed
above regarding the proposed set of plans for this hillside project
Respecthrlly,
9/^*l
John and Danielle Roman
,t$*;e-.4,*-*RECEIVED
,r,
EXHIBIT ''A''
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption, Design Review and a
Construction Permit effective August 5, 2002.
l. l. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans
Permit for Hillside Area
to the Planning Department
, floor plans and buildingdate stamped June 14,2002, Sheets A1-1 through A3-2 site
elevations, and the two skylights on the front of the house be tinted to reduce night
glare, the tint shall be approved by the Planning
permit;
prior to issuance of the building
i
2. that any changes to the size or envelope of the , first or second floors, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch,subject to design review;
3. that the project shall comply with the
Ordinance which requires affected
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet
demolition of a structure, interior or
and Demolition Debris Recycling
construction and alteration projects to
requirements; any partial or full
require a demolition permit;shall
4. that the conditions of the Recycling
memos shall be met;
's and the City Engineer's May 13, 2002,
5. that prior to scheduling the roof , a licensed surveyor shall establish the
height of the roof ridge and provide of that height to the building department;
6. that prior to scheduling the inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall architectural certification that the architectural details such
as window locations and bays , built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no
the project, the property owner or contractor shall providelicensed professional
the certification under of perjury;
7. that prior to final
the architectural details
built according to the Planning and Building plans; and
8. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of
materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
TEL: (650) 558-7250
2843 ARGUELLO DRIVE
Appeal of a Pl-anning Commission denial
of an application for design review and
hillside area construction permit for a
first and second story addition at 2843
Arguello Drive, zoned R-1.
(APN: 025-034-140) i
The City of Burlingame City Council
announces the following public heating
on Mondarr, Auqust 5 , 2002 ats 7:00 P.M.
in the City Ha1I Council Chambers
located at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California.
Mailed July 26, 2OO2
(Please reJbr to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy ofthe appl
to the meeting
Burlingame,
If you
raising
described
at or prior to
Property
tenants
558-7250.
Margaret
City Planne. '....,.
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
ecl may be reviewed prior
Primrose Road,
be limited to
blic hearing,
to the city
their
call (650)
ARI
(Please refer to other side)
CIW OF BURLINGATIIE
ctw couNclL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGATE, CA9401O
RECEIVED
^L]3
J i 20c2
C]TY CLERK'S OFFICE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
(I)MMI.'f{ICATICN RECEIVEE
AFTER PREPARAIION
OF S] AFF REPORT
RE: 284t1 ARGUELLO DRIVE
BURLIT{GAME
APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COTTISS]ON DET{IAL
APN 025 034140
I RESIOE AT 1600 SEBASTIAN ORIVE, CORNER HOME, LOOKING HEAD ON AT
2843 ARGUELLO ORIVE.
I RESPECTFULLY PRAISE THE WORK ANO THE EFFORT THE PLANNING COiiIMISSION
PUT FORTH BEFORE
'UIAKING
THEIR DECISION. EACH ilIE]UIBER i'ADE IT A POINT
ON SUNDAY TO COME AND VIEW THE SITUATION AT HAND. THEY CAME INTO
OUR HOMES, LOOKED OUT OUR WINDOWS, AND WENT UP AND DOWN THE HILL SO
THAT A JUSTIFIABLE DECISION WOULD BE TADE.
THE PLANNING COMillSSloN WENT THE EXTRA ItllLE AND MADE SUGGESTlgi{g
TOOURNEIGHBORSFORAPOSSIBLE WORKABLE DES]GN. NOONEWANTSTHEM
TO LEAVE OUR COMMUNIW. IAII NOT ADVERSEO TO THEM WANTING TO ADD ON TO
THEIR HOME.
I TREASURE IIIY VIEW AND I TREASURE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. A TOTAL REIUODAL
TOOK PLACE ON THEIR UP€IDE ANO IWILL CHALLENGE ANYONE TO STATE THAT
THE REMODEL LOOKS NEW OR THE HOME OOESN'T FIT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
DESIGN.
BACK IN TARCH 6, .1989, AN ORDINANCE, 1388 2, WAS PASSEO THAT DEALS WITH
THE OBSTRUCT]ON OF DISTANT VIEWS FROI' HABITABLE AREAS WITHIN A
DWELLING UNIT. THIS ORDINANCE CAIIE ABOUT TO PROTECT THE VIEWS OF
EVERYONE IN i'ILLS ESTATE. WITHIN THE PAST FEW YEARS' WE HAVE HAD
ANOTHER PROBI.E'II IN ALL OF BURLINGAIIIE KNOWN AS THE']IIONSTER HOUSES".
OUR HOTIE IS OIIR TREASURE AND OUR NEIGHBORHOOO AOOS TO OUR TREASURE.
BURLINGAME IS A COTTUNITY OF CHART AND FRIENDSHlP.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO TAKE YOUR TIME IN READING MY LETTER.
July 31, 2002
RESPECTFULLY,
.22..,- -ot Aha<.
ANN MARIE UilLAND
1600 SEBASTIAN DRIVE
BURLINGAiIE, CA 94010
650692-3551
.e[-l a
COMMUNICATI0N RECEIVI T
AFTER PREPARAI-ION
OFSTAFf REPORTRECEIVED
JUL 3 1" 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DE PT.
Head of Planning Department,
City of Burlingarrre,
501 Primrose Road,
Burlingarre, CA 94010.
Dear Sir,
Re: 2843 Arguello Dril,
Thank you very much lbr letting us know that the owner of 2843 Arguello Drive has appealed
the Commission's deniril of an application for desrgn review and hillside area construction
permit. However, we are much upset by the news. On one side of our property, located uphill
fro- us, is already the two-story house of 1600 Sebastian Drive. If the owners of 2843 Arguello
Drive add a second story to their house, it will fi.rrther deprive us of sunlight and view, and
overshadow our house. Also, it will affect the marketability of our property. We would prefer
that2S4l Argueilo Drive remain a one-story house. However, ifthe City ailows them to add, we
strongly request that ttre total height ofthe reconstructed 2843 Arguello Drive not to exceed the
total height of 2847 Arguello Drive. We hope that you will understand our difficult situation and
take our suggestion into consideration.
Thank you very much, and hope our grievances will be heard by you-
Yours sincerely,
Kwok To Wong Rosario Wong
Kwok To & Rosario Wong,
2838 Arguello Drive,
Burlingame, CA 94010.
July 28, 2002.
lbr
2839 Arguello Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
COMMUN,CAT,ON
RECEYEE
AFTER PREPARA,,ON
oFslAFF REP0PT
luly29,2N2
Burlingame City Council
501 Primose Road
Burlingame, CA 94:010
Re: 2843 Arguello Drive - Planning Commission Appeal
DearCouncil Members:
On behalf of the otrselves and other neighbors that would be directly and adversely atrected
by the 2d story re:modeling plans at 2843 Arguello drivg we respectfirlly request that the
Burlingame City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision (a vote of 6-0-1) to
deny the applicant'sr plans.
Please refer to the previous letters of concem that were submitted by all of the surrounding
neighbors to the Planning Commission prior to their decisive decision
We believe the Planning Commission's investigation was thorough and complete.
Additionally, their gesture to consider a ls floor variance was generous and would have
relieved the problenr of blocked views and privacy concems at this hillside location.
Please feel free to visit ow home ifyou have the time.
RECEIVED
Sincerely,JUL 3 0 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
John and Danielle Roman
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
July 30, 2OO2 BY
APPROVED
PUBLIC WORKS BY
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE TO ADOPT BUILDING
ELECTRICAL CODES
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
8t5t02
7a
UMBING, MECHANICAL AND
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council begin adoption of the attached ordinance adopting
the 2OOlEditions of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Codes with local amendments
by:
A. Requesting City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance.
B. Waiving further reading of the ordinance.
C. Introducing the proposed ordinance.
D. Directing the City Clerk to publish a sunmary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption.
The model construction codes in California are adopted on a triennial basis. The codes are amended versions of
the Uniform Building Code published bythe lnternational Conference ofBuilding Officials, the Uniform Plumbing
Code published by the Intemational Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Offrcials and the National Electric
Code published by the National Fire Protection Association.
DISCUSSION: The City is obligated by State law to adopt and enforce the latest codes by November 1,2002.
The State, in turn, is obligated to adopt and amend the most recent editions of nationally recognized codes. This
year the State has re-adopted the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building code and the Uniform Fire Code which
is no longer coordinated with the Building Code. The State has also adopted the 1999 Edition of the National
Electrical Code even though the 2002 Edition contains a number of improvements in fire and life safety and
permits new methods and materials not recognized in the 1999 Edition.
The lawpermits jurisdictions to adopt amendments to the State Codes if findings are filed withthe State Building
Standards Commission justiffingthe changes onthe basis of local geologic, topographical and climactic reasons.
See attached ordinance for findings. The proposed ordinance contains changes to update the structural provisions
to current standards, recognize new materials not contained in the State's Plumbing and Mechanical Codes and
modiff the State Electrical Code to incorporate the provisions contained in the most recent National Electrical
Code. The amendments included in the attached ordinance have been developed by local Chapters of the
International Conference of Building Officials, and the majority ofjurisdictions on the Peninsula and in Monterey
County have agreed to adopt them.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance
BUDGET IMPACT: Required additional training and book purchases are included in the 2002103 Building
Division operating budget.
c: City Clerk, City Attorney
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Ordinance Building Codes.wpd
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING REYISIONS TO
TITLE 18, BUILDING CODE, MECHAIIICAL CODE, PLUMBING CODE, AND
ELECTRICAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows:
Section t. The City of Burlingame is located between the Santa Cruz Mountains foothills
and San Francisco Bay, with a number of substantial creeks flowing through highly developed
residential and industrial areas. It is surrounded by large areas of open space maintained in natural
condition, as well as having a significant natural canyon in the center ofthe residential area. Strong
winds come down the foothills during both the driest and the wettest parts of the year. The City
is directly east of the San Andreas Fault, and much of the highly developed part of the City is
located along the front of the Bay, much of it on fill. The United States Geologic Survey, the
California Division of Mines and Geology, and the Association of Bay Area Governments have
extensively mapped the area for such earthquake probabilities. The foothill areas have a variety
of soil formations with steep canyons and heavy precipitation. Much of the City has a high water
table. Fires in the community could quickly spread because of the extensive, natural vegetation
throughout the City. The City has a number of highly developed commercial areas with older
buildings, and an industrial area that is filled with mixed uses utilizing various materials that could
be highly hazardous. In addition, heavily traveled approach and departure routes for San Francisco
International Airport are immediately adjacent or over the City. The City is also located in a
national climate zone that is designated "Very High" on the Termite Infestation probability Map.
The Cityhas worked with otherjurisdictions on the San Francisco Peninsula to establish consistent
standards to minimize the impact that varying standards might have on development and
redevelopment of both residential and commercial buildings. It is only through strong building
standards and effective fire prevention and containment programs that citizens will receive the
protection they deserve, and that citizens will be able to obtain reasonablypriced insurance for their
homes and businesses. In seeking to attain these goals, the building standards in Title 18 have been
1
and are adopted.
Section 2. ln addition, in order to provide appropriate, clear information to applicants for
construction approvals, Sections 18.07.050 and 18.12.030 are adopted to conform Title 18 to
Zoning Code requirements established in the Municipal Code.
Section 3. The City operates its own sanitary sewer system and water quality control plant
and is subject to State and Federal laws regarding both point and non-point discharges. Sections
18.07.060, 19.09.010, 19.12.090, 19.12.090, 19.12.100, 19.t2.110, 1g.12.115, 18.12.120, and
18.12.125 are intended to assist the City in meeting its responsibilities regarding those laws as well
as protecting the public safety and welfare.
Section 4. The City also operates its own water supply system for its citizens. Sections
18.07.060,18.12.050, 18.12.060, 18.12.070,and 18.12.100 are intendedto provide consistentpolicy
regarding water service installations and to protect the public's water supply.
Section 5. Chapter 18.08 is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.08
BUILDING CODE
18.08.010 Adoption of Uniform Building Code Volume l.18.08.020 Adoption of Uniform Building Code Volume 2.
18.08.010 Adoption of Uniform Building Code Volume l.
The rules, regulations and requirements published by the lnternational Conference of
Building Officials under the title "1997 Uniform Building Code Volume 1" and adopted as the
*2001 California Building Code Volume 1" including Appendix Chapters 3,{ (Division I only), 4
(Division I only), 12 (Division IIA only), 15,31 (Division III only),33 and 34 and, State of
California amendments thereto, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards within
this city as to all matters therein contained with the following amendments:
z7t3012002
(a) Section 105 amended - Appeals.
Section 105 is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 105 _ APPEALS
An appeal of a denial of or a refusal to issue a permit or from any other decision of
the building official may be taken as set forth in section 18.07.040.
(b) Sections 106 through 109 and Table 1-A deleted.
Sections 106 through 109 and Table 1-A are deleted.
(c) section 213 amended - Add Definition-Light Frame construction.
Section 213 is amended by adding the following definition:
LIGHT-FRAME CONSTRUCTION is a tlpe of construction whose
vertical and horizontal structural elements are primarily formed by a system of
repetitive wood or light gauge steel framing members.
(d) Section 310.6.1 amended-Ceiling Height
Section 310.6.1 is amended to read as follows:
310.6.1 Minimumheight:Habitablerooms,hallways,corridors,bathrooms,toilet
rooms, laundryrooms and basements shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7
feet (2134 mm). The height shall be measured from the finished floor to the lowest
projection from the ceiling.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Beams and girders spaced not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) on
center may project not more than 6 inches (152 mm) below the required
ceiling height.
2. Ceilings in basements without habitable spaces may project to
within 6 feet,8 inches (2032 mm) of the finish floor; and beams, girders,
37/30t2002
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
T2
13
l4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ducts or other obstructions may project within 6 feet, 4 inches (1931 mm)
of the finished floor.
3. Not more than 50 percent of the required floor area of a room or
space is permitted to have a sloped ceiling less than 7 feet (2134 mm) in
height with no portion ofthe required floor area less than 5 feet (I52amm)
in height.
(e) Section 502 amended - Premises identification required.
Section 502 is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 502 _ PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings
in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting
the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, shall be a
minimum of one-half inch stroke by two and one-half inches high, and shall be
either internally or externally illuminated in all new construction, alterations or
repair of existing construction. The power of such illumination shall not be
normally switchable. Numbers or letters shall be designated on all occupancies
within abuilding. Size shall be aminimum one-quarter inch stroke bytwo inches
high and on a contrasting background. Directional address numbers or letters shall
be provided. Said addresses or numbers shall be posted at a height no greater than
5 feet, 6 inches above the finished floor.
(f) Section 1203.2 amended -- LIGHT AND VENTILATION IN GROUP R
OCCUPAI\CIES.
Section 1203.2 is amended to read as follows:
1203.2 LIGIIT and YENTILATION-HABITABLE ROOMS. All habitable
rooms shall be provided with an aggregate glazingarea of not less than 8 percent
of the floor area of such rooms. Natural ventilation shall be through windows,
7t30/2002 4
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1t
t2
13
l4
15
t6
t7
l8
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
doors, louvers or other approved openings to the outdoor air. Such openings shall
be provided with ready access or shall be otherwise readily controllable by the
building occupants. The minimum openable area to the outdoors shall be 4 percent
of the floor area being ventilated.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. The glazed areas need not be openable if not designated as
emergency escape and rescue windows and an approved mechanical
ventilation system is provided capable of producing 0.35 air change per
hour in the room or a whole-house mechanical ventilation system capable
of supplying outdoor ventilation air of 15 cubic feet per minute (cfin (7.08
L/s) per occupant computed on the basis of two occupants for the first
bedroom and one occupant for each additional bedroom.
2.The glazedareas need not be provided in rooms where Exception
1 above is satisfied and artificial light is provided capable of producing an
average illumination of 6 footcandles (6.46 lux) over the area of the room
at a height of 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor level.
Bathrooms: Bathrooms, water closet compartments and other similar rooms shall
be provided with aggregate glazingareain windows of not less than 3 square feet
(0.279 square meter), one-half of which must be openable.
EXCEPTION: The glazedareas shall not be required where artificial light
and a mechanical ventilation system are provided. The minimum
ventilation rates shall be 50 cfm (23.6L|s) for intermittent ventilation or 20
cfrn (9.4 L/s) for continuous ventilation. Ventilation air from the space
shall be exhausted directly to the outside.
(g) Section 1203.3 deleted -- Ventilation.
Section 1203.3 is hereby deleted.
5'7t30t2002
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(h) Section 1503 amended - Roof covering requirements.
The first paragraph of Section 1503 is amended to read as follows:
All materials applied as roof covering on any structure regulated bythis code shall
have a fire retardant rating of Class A or B as specified in Table 15-A as amended
herein, treated in accordance with UBC Standard l5-7 .
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Detached patio covers, spa covers, gazebos and sheds with 120
square feet or less of projected roof area, and awning covers, are exempt
from Section 1503 and Appendix Section 1514.
2. Roof covering repairs of less than 300 square feet are exempt
from Section 1503 and Appendix Section 1514.
(i) Section 1506.5 amended-Roof and surface drainage requirements.
Section 1506.5 is amended to read as follows:
1506.5 Roof and Surface Drainage Requirements.
1506.5.1 ln all zones other than R-l, the water from the roof of any building and
from any paved area which would flow by gravity over public sidewalk shall be
carried by means of conductors under the sidewalk and through the curb to the
gutter, or other approved location.
1506.5.2 No storm water or underground water draining from any lot, building, or
paved area shall be allowed to drain to adjacent properties nor shall this water be
connected to the city's Sanitary sewer system. Regardless of the slope ofthe source
property, such water shall drain to either artificial or natural storm drainage
facilities by gravity or pumping.
fi) Appendix Chapter 15 amended - Reroofing requirements.
The following portions of Sections 1514 and l52l of Appendix Chapter 15 are amended
as follows:
67/3012002
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
l7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(1) The second paragraph of Section 1514 is amended to read:
Roof covering materials shall be fire retardant Class A or Class B in
accordance with Tables 15-A and 15-B-2 as amended, and reroofing materials and
methods of application shall comply with the applicable UBC Standards or shall
follow the manufacturer's installation requirements when approved bythe building
official.
(2) Section 1521 of Appendix Chapter 15 is amended by adding the following sentence at
the end of the section:
Such roofing materials shall comply with the fire retardancy requirements of
Section 18.08.080.
(k) Table l5-A-Roof Minimum fire retardant classes.
Table No. 15-A is amended to read as follows:
7
TABLE NO. 15-A - MINIMI]M ROOT' CLASSES
OCCUPAI\CY
TYPES OF'CONSTRUCTION
I II u IV V
FR FR 1HR N IHR HT IHR N
A-1 B B
A-2, A-2.1 B B B B B B B B B
A-3 B B B B B B B B B
A4 B B B B B B B B B
B B B B B B B B B B
E B B B B B B B B B
F B B B B B B B B B
H-1 A A A A
H-2 thru H-6 A B B B B B B B B
I-1 thru I-2.1 A B B B B B
7130/2002
N
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
l6
t7
18
r9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I-3 A B
M B B B B B B B B B
R A B B B B B B B B
s-1 B B B B B B B B B
S-2 thru S-5 B B B B B B B B B
U B B B B B B B B B
A-Class A Roofing B-Class B Roofing C-Class C Roofing HT-Heavy Timber FR-Fire Resistive
All foobrotes are deleted
(/) Tabte l5-B-2 - Wood shingle or shake application.
Sections t through 3 of Table l5-B-2 are amended to read as follows
8
TABLE NO. 15-8.2 - SHINGLE OR SHAKE APPLICATION
ROOF'SLOPE
FIRE.RETARDAIIT
PRESSURE TREATED
WOOD SHINGLES
r,IRE RETARDAITT
PRESSURE TREATED
WOOD SHAKES
Not permitted below 3:12 Not permitted below 4:12'
1. Deck requirements Shingles and shakes shall be applied to roofs with solid sheathing.
2. Interlayment No requirements.One 18-inch wide interlayment
of Type 30 felt shingled
between each course in such a
manner that no felt is exposed
to the weather below the shake
butts.
7t3012002
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
16
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Underlayment Metal foil with Type 30 felt
liner between courses or other
underlayment that would allow
the roof covering and assembly
to achieve Class B rating.
The above material shall be
placed over metal foil with
Type 30 felt liner between
courses or other underlayment
to achieve a Class B rating.
I When approved by the Building Official, wood shakes may be installed on a slope of not less than 3
inches in l2 inches when an underlayment of not less than nonperforated Type I 5 felt is installed.
(m) Section 1611.6 amended - Retaining wall requirements.
Section 16ll.6 is amended by adding the following two paragraphs at the end of the
section:
When a structure is to support a lateral load which retains fill which
supports another structure, supports the toe of a slope which is over four feet in
height measured from the bottom of the footing, or is required by the city engineer,
it shall be designed by a licensed architect or engineer and approved by the city
engineer.
The following tlpes of retaining walls shall be of concrete or other material
which shall have a minimum service life of 75 years for all major support systems
and 50 years for all replaceable support systems: Walls that are engineered, support
a lateral load over 18" at property line, support an engineered surcharge, support a
structure, or support a toe of a slope. A fence structure may not be substituted for
a retaining wall.
(n) Section 1904.4 amended -- Minimum slab thickness.
Section L904.4 is amended to read as follows:
1904.4 The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs shall be 3-Tl2 inches (89
mm).
9'1130t2002
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
I2
13
t4
t5
t6
17
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Membrane waterproofing or waterproofing acceptable to the building
official shall be provided.
Such granular material shall be approved by the building official.
Concrete slabs on grade shall be reinforced with not less than six inch by six
inch ten gauge wire mesh installed at the nominal mid-point of the slab thickness.
(o) Section 3403 amended - Additions, alterations or repairs-Suspended ceiling
upgrade.
Section 3403 is amended by adding a new Subsection 3403.6 to read as follows:
Section 3403.6 Suspended Ceiling Upgrade. When an addition, alteration or
repair is performed on an occupancy in which there is an existing suspended
ceiling, such suspended ceiling shall be modified throughout to comply with the
lateral design requirements of UBC Standard 25-2.
1808.020 Adoption of Uniform Building Code, Volume 2.
The rules, regulations and requirements published by the International Conference of
Building Officials under the title *1997 Uniform Building Code Volume 2" and adopted as the
"2001 California Building Code Volume 2" is adopted as and for the rules, regulations and
standards within this city as to all matters therein contained except as amended as follows:
(a) Section 1612.2.1amended -- General.
Section 1612.2.1is amended to read as follows:
1612.2.1Basic load combinations. Where Load and Resistance Factor Design
(Strength Design) is used, structures and all portions thereof shall resist the most
critical effects from the following combinations of factored loads:
t.4D (rz-t)
l.2D+1.6L+ 0.5 (Z,or^9) (t2-2)
l.2D + 1.6 (L,or S) + (f, L or 0.8 W) (12-3)
7t30/2002 10
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
r0
ll
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
17
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
l.2D + l3W + (f, L + 0.5 (2. or $
l.2D+1.0E+(\L+f2s)
09D +(l.0pEoor l.3W)
(12-4)
(12-s)
(12-6)
WHERE:
f, : 1.0 for floors in places of public assembly, for live loads in
excess of 100 psf (4.9 kN/m2 ), and for garage live load.
: 0.5 for other live loads.
f2 : 0.7 for roof configurations (such as saw tooth) that do not
shed snow off the structure.
: 0.2 for other roof configurations.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Factored load combinations for concrete per
Section 1909.2 where load combinations do not include seismic forces.
2. Where other factored load combinations are specificallyrequired
by the provisions of this code.
(b) Section 1612.3.1amended - Basic Load Combinations.
The last sentence in section 1612.3.1is amended to read as follows:
No increase in allowable stresses shall be used with these load combinations except
as specifically permitted elsewhere in this code and the duration of load increase
permitted in Division trI of Chapter 23.
(c) Section 1612.3.2 amended - Alternate Basic Load Combinations.
The last sentence of the first paragraph of the section is amended to read:
When using these altemate basic load combinations, a one-third increase shall be
permitted in allowable stresses for all combinations including W or E but not
concurrent with the duration of load increase permitted in Division Itr of Chapter
23.
7/30t2002 11
(d) Section 1629.4.2 amended - Seismic Zone 4 near-source Factor
Section 1629.4.2 is amended to read as follows:
1629.4.2. Seismic Zone 4 near-source factor. ln Seismic Zone 4, each site shall
be assigned a near-source factor in accordance with Table 16-5 and the Seismic
Source Tlpe set forth in Table 16-U. The value of.A/, used in determining C,need
not exceed 1.1 for structures complying with all the following conditions:
l. The soil profile type is Su, Sr, S. or Sr.
2' P: 1'o'
3. Except in single-story structures, Group R, Division 3 and Group U,
Division I Occupancies, moment frame systems designated as part of the lateral-
force-resisting system shall be special moment-resisting frames.
4. The provisions in Sections 9.6a and 9.6b of AISC - Seismic Part I shall
not apply, except for columns in one-storybuildings or columns at the top story of
multistory buildings.
5. None of the following structural inegularities is present: Type 1,4 or 5
of Table 16-L, and Tlpe 1 or 4 of Table 16-M.
(e) Table 16-N amended
Table 16-N is amended to read as follows:
TABLE 16.N _ STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS '
BASIC STRUCruRAL
SYSTEM
LATERAL -FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION R oo
HEIGHT LIMIT
FOR SEISMIC
ZONES 3 AND 4
(feeQ
x 304.8 form mm
7t30/2002 72
l. Bearing wall system l. Lighrframed walls with shear panels
a. Wood structural panels for structures
three stories or less
b. All other light-framed walls
2. Shear walls
a. Concrete
b. Masonry
3. Light steel-framed bearing walls with
tension-only bracing
4. Braced frames where bracing carries
gravity load
a. Steel
b. Concrete3
c. Heavy timbers
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
2.8
4.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
65
65
160
r60
65
t60
_3
65
2. Building frame system l. Steel eccentrically braced frame (EBF)
2. Lightframed walls with shear panels
a. Wood structural panel walls for
structures three stories or less
b. All other light-framed walls
3. Shear walls
a. Concrete
b. Masonry
4. Ordinary braced frames
a. Steel6
b. Concrete3
c. Heavy timber
5. Special concentrically braced frames
a. Steel
7.0
6.5
5.0
5.5
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.6
6.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
))
2.2
2.2
2.2
240
65
65
240
160
356
_3
65
240
3. Moment-resisting frame
system
l. Special moment-resisting frame (SMRF)
a. Steel
b. Concretea
2. Masonry moment-resisting wall frame
(MMRWF)
3. Intermediate moment-resisting frame
(rMRr)
a. Steel6
b. Concretes
4. Ordinary moment-resisting frame
(oMR-F)
a. Steel6
b. ConcreteE
5. Special truss moment frames of steel
(STMF)
8.5
8.5
6.5
4.5
5.5
3.5
3.5
6.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
N.L.
N.L.
160
356
____3
356
_3
240
7t30t2002 13
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
l7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. Dual svstems l. Shear walls
a. Concrete with SMRF
b. Concrete with concrete IMRF5
c. Masonrywith SMRF
d. Masonrywith IMRI3
e. Masonrywith masonryMMRWF
2. Steel EBF
a, With steel SMRF
3. Special concenfficallybraced frames
a. Steel with steel SMRF
8,5
6.5
5.5
4.2
6.0
8.5
7.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
N.L.
_5
_5
_3
160
N.L.
N.L.
5. Cantilevered column building
systems
l. Cantilevered column elements 2.2 2.0 357
6. Shear wall-frame interaction
systems
l. Concretet 5.5 2.8 160
7. Undefined systems See Sections 1629.6.7 and 1629.9.2
I
2
3
4
5
6
See Section 1630.4 for combination of structural systems.
Basic structural systems are defined in Section 1629.6.
Prohibited in Seismic Zones3 and 4.
Includes precast concrete conforming to Section 1921.2.7.
Prohibited in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, except as permitted in Section 1634.2.
ln Seismic Zones3 and4 steel IMRF's,-OMRI"s and steel ordinarybraced frames arepermitted
as follows:6'r Structures using Steel IMRF's and OMRF's are permitted to a height of 35 ft. where the total
dead weight ofthe floors, walls and roof do not exceed 35 psf. or for single-storybuildings
where the moment joints of field connections are construcled of bolted end pla:tes and tfie
dead load of the roof does not exceed l5 psf. the height is permitted to be increased to 60
ft.
6'2 Steel ot-dif.y braced frames are permitted in penthouse structures and in other one-story
buildings or structures where the total dead weight ofthe roof does not exceed l5 psf, anil
- the height of the building or structure does not exceed 60 feet.' Total height of the building including cantilevered columns." Prohibited in Seismic Zones 2A,28,3 and 4. See Section 1633.2.7.
N.L.- no limit
(f) Section 1630.2.3.5 renumbered to Section 1630.2.3.4
Section 1630.2.3.4 is renumbered as Section 1630.2.3.5.
(g) Section 1630.2.3.4 added - New section on Horizontal Distribution.
A new Section 1630.2.3.4 is added to read:
1630.2.3.4 Horizontal Distribution. Diaphragms constructed of untopped steel
decking orwood structural panels or similar lighrframe construction arepermitted
to be considered as flexible.
7/30t2002 74
I
2
-1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(h) Section 1630.4.2 amended -Vertical Combinations.
A sentence is added to the end ofthe last paragraph to read:
This ratio shall not be taken less than 1.0
(i) Section 1630.7 amended - Horizontal Torsional Moments.
Section 1630.7 is amended to read as follows:
1630.7 Horizontal TorsionalMoments. Provisions shallbemade forthe increased
shears resulting from horizontal torsion where diaphragms are not flexible. The
most severe load combination for each element shall be considered for design.
The torsional design moment at a given story shall be the moment resulting
from eccentricities between applied design lateral forces at levels above that story
and the vertical-resisting elements in that storyplus an accidental torsion.
The accidental torsional moment shall be determined by assuming the mass
is displaced as required by Section 1630.6.
Where torsional inegularity exists, as defined in Table 16-M, the effects
shall be accounted for by increasing the accidental torsion at each level by an
amplification factor,l* , determined from the following formula:
5 max
2
A (3G101.25,,,s
WHERE:
Sour:the average of the storydrift-at the extreme points of the structure at Levelx.
5^*: the maximum displacement story drift_at Level x.
The value of A,need not exceed 3.0.
fi) Section 1630.8.2.1 amended - General.
Section 1630.8.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
1630.8.2.1 General. Where any portion of the lateral-load-resisting system is
7/30/2002 15
x
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I2
13
l4
15
l6
t7
t8
L9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
discontinuous, such as for vertical irregularity Type 4 in Table 16-L or plan
irregularity Tlpe 4 in Table I 6-M, columns, beirns, trusses or slabs-supporting such
discontinuous systems shall have the design strength to resist the combination loads
resulting from the special seismic load combinations of Section 1612.4. The
Connections of such discontinued elements to the supporting members shall be
adequate to transmit the forces for which the discontinuous elements were required
to be designed.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. The quantity E^in Section 1612.4 need not
exceed the maximum force that can be transferred to the element by the
lateral-force-resisting system.
2. Concrete slabs supporting light-frame wood shear wall systems
or light-frame steel and wood structural panel shear wall systems.
For Allowable Stress Design, the design strength may be determined using
an allowable stress increase of 1.7 and a resistance factor, O, of 1.0. This increase
shall not be combined with the one-third stress increase permitted by Section
1612.3, but may be combined with the duration of load increase permitted in
Chapter 23, Division Itr.
(k) Section 1630.8.2 amended - Detailing Requirements in Seismic Zones 3 and 4.
Section 1630.8.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
1630.8.2.2 Detailing requirements in Seismic Zones 3 and 4.In Seismic Zones
3 and 4, elements supporting discontinuous systems shall meet the following
detailing or member limitations:
l. Reinforced concrete or reinforced masonry elements designed primarily
as axial-load members shall comply with Section 1921.4.4.5.
2. Reinforced concrete elements designed primarily as flexural members and
supporting other than lighfframe wood shear wall systems or light-frame steel and
wood structural panel shear wall systems shall comply with Sections l92l .3.2 and
7t30t2002 15
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
13
l4
l5
t6
l7
18
t9
20
2r
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1921.3.3. Strength computations for portions of slabs designed as supporting
elements shall include only those portions of the slab that comply with the
requirements of these Sections.
3. Masonry elements designed primarily as axial-load carrying members
shall comply with Sections 2106.1.12.4, Item 1, md 2108.2.6.2.6.
4. Masonry elements designed primarily as flexural members shall comply
with Section 2108.2.6.2.5.
5. Steel elements designed primarily as flexural members or trusses shall
have bracing for both top and bottom beam flanges or chords at the location of the
support of the discontinuous system and shall comply with the requirements of
AISC-Seismic Part I, Section 9.4b.
(I) Section 1630.10.2 amended - Calculated.
Section 1630.10.2 is amended to read as follows:
1630.10.2 Calculated. Calculated story drift using A, shall not exceed 0.025 times
the storyheight for structures having a fundamental period of less than 0.5 second.
For structures having a fundamental period of 0.5 second or greater, the calculated
story drift shall not exceed 0.0201T r/3 times the story height.
Q{ote : EXCEPTIONS remain unchanged)
(m) Section 1630.10.3 amended - Limitations.
Section 1630.10.3 is amended to read as follows:
1630.10.3 Limitations. The design lateral forces used to determine the calculated
drift may disregard the limitations ofFormula (30-6) and (30-7) (Errata Mar. 2001)
and may be based on the period determined from Formula (30-10) neglecting the
30 or 40 percent limitations of Section 1630.2.2,Item2.
(n) Section 1633.2.4 amended - Deformation Compatibility.
7/3012002 L7
Section 1633.2.4 is amended to read as follows:
1633.2.4 Deformation compatibility. All structural framing elements and their
connections, not required by design to be part of the lateral-force-resisting system,
shall be designed and/or detailed to be adequate to maintain support of design dead
plus live loads when subjected to the expected deformations caused by seismic
forces. P/ effects on such elements shall be considered. Expected deformations
shall be determined as the greater of the Maximum Inelastic Response
Displacement, AIuI, consideringP/ effects determined in accordance with Section
1630.9.2 or the deformation induced by a story drift of 0.0025 times the story
height. When computing expected deformations, the stiffening effect of those
elements not part of the lateral-force-resisting system shall be neglected.
For elements not part of the lateral-force-resisting system, the forces
induced by the expected deformation may be considered as ultimate or factored
forces. When computing the forces induced by expected deformations, the
restraining effect of adjoining rigrd structures and nonstructural elements shall be
considered and a rational value of member and restraint stiffrress shall be used.
Inelastic deformations ofmembers and connections arepermittedto occur,provided
the assumed calculated capacities are consistent with member and connection
design and detailing.
(o) Section 1915.2.2 amended - Loads and Reactions.
Section 1915.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
1915.2.2 Base area of footing or number and arangement of piles shall be
determined from the external forces and moments (transmitted by footing to soil or
piles) and permissible soil pressure or permissible pile capacity selected through
principles of soil mechanics. External forces and moments are those resulting from
the load combinations of Section1612.3.
7t30/2002 18
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(p) Section 2204.1amended - Load and Resistance Factor Design
Section 2204.1is amended by deleting the last sentence.
(q) Section 2204.2 amended - Allowable Stress Design.
Section 2204.2 is amended by deleting the last sentence.
(r) Section 2205.3 amended - Seismic Design Provisions for Structural Steel.
Section 2205.3 is amended by deleting the words "or V" at the end of the first sentence.
(s) Division IV of Chapter 22 amended - Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel
Buildings.
The subtitle of Division [V is amended to read as follows:
Based on Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings of the
American Institute of Steel Construction. Parts I and III, dated April
15,1997 and Supplement No. 2, dated,November 10, 2000
(t) Section 2210 amended - Adoption.
Section 2210 is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 22IO _ ADOPTION
Except for the modifications set forth in Sections 22ll and2212 of
this division and the requirements of this Code, the seismic design,
fabrication, and erection of structural steel buildings shall be in accordance
with the Seismic Provisionsfor Structural Steel Buildings, April 15, 1997
published by the American Institute of Steel Construction, I East Wacker
Drive, Suite 3100, Chicago, IL 60601, as if set out at length herein. The
adoption of Structural Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings in this
Division , hereinafter referred to as AISC-Seismic, shall include Parts I
(LRFD), and III (ASD), and Supplement No. 2, dated,November 10, 2000.
7t30t2002 19
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
l3
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Where other codes, standards, or specifications are referred to in this
specification, they are to be considered as only an indication of an acceptable
method or material that can be used with the approval of the Building
Official.
(u) Section 22ll amended - Design Methods.
Section 22ll is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 22II _ DESIGN METHODS
Whenthe load combinations from Section1612.2 forLRFD areused,
structural steel buildings shall be designed in accordance with Chapter 22
Division tr (AISC-LRFD) and Part I of AISC-Seismic as modified by this
Division.
When the load combinations from Section 1612.3 for ASD are used,
structural steel buildings shall be designed in accordance with Chapter 22
Division m (AISC-ASD) and Part Itr of AISC-Seismic as modified by this
Division.
(v) Section 2212 amended -- General.
Section 22L2 is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 2212 _ AMENDMENTS
The AISC-Seismic adopted by this Division apply to the seismic
design of structural steel members except as modified by this Section.
The following terms that appear in AISC-Seismic shall be taken as
indicated in the 1997 Uniform Building Code:
AISC Seismic 1997 Uniform Building Code
Seismic Force Resisting System Lateral Force Resisting System
Design Earthquake Design Basis Ground Motion
7130/2002 20
Load Combinations Eqs. (4-1) md@-2) Chapter 16 Eqs. (12-17) and (12-18)
respectively
LRI'D Specification Sections Eqs. (A4-
l) through (A4-6)
oQt
Chapter 16 Eqs. (12-1) through (12-6)
respectively
E.
1. Part I, Sec. I of the AISC Seismic Provisions is revised as follows:
1. SCOPE
These provisions are intended for the design and construction of
structural steel members and connections in the Seismic Force Resisting
Systems in buildings for which the design forces resulting from earthquake
motions have been determined on the basis of various levels of energy
dissipation in the inelastic range of response. These provisions shall apply
to buildings in SeismicZone2withan importance factor I greater than one,
in Seismic Zone 3 and 4 or when required by the Engineer of Record.
These provisions shall be applied in conjunction with, Chapter 22,
Division II, hereinafter referred to as the LRI'D Specification. All members
and connections in the Lateral Force Resisting System shall have a design
strength as provided in the LRFD Specification to resist load combinations
12-l through 12-6 (in Chapter 16) and shall meet the requirements in these
provisions.
Part I includes a Glossary, which is specifically applicable to this Part,
and Appendix S.
2. Part I, Sec. 4.1, first paragraph of the AISC Seismic Provisions is revised as
follows:
4.1 Loads and Load Combinations
The loads and load combinations shall those in Section 1612.2 except
as modified throughout these provisions.
7/30/2002 2t
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
l5
16
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(w) Chapter 23, Division III amended - Design Specifications for Allowable
Stress Design of Wood Buildings.
The introduction to Chapter 23,Division III Part I-ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN
OF WOOD is amended to read:
Division III-DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE
STRESS DESIGN OF WOOD BUILDINGS
Part I-ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF WOOD
This standard, with certain exceptions, is the AI\ISIAIFoPA NDS-97
National Design Specilication for Wood Construction of the American
Forest and Paper Associationrl99T Edition, and the Supplement to the
1997_Edition, National Design Specification, adopted by reference.
The National Design Specification for Wood Construction, 1997
Edition, and supplement are available from the American Forest and Paper
Association, 1111 19th Street, N'W, Eighth Floor, Washington, DC, 20036.
(x) Section 2316 amended - Design Specifications.
Section 2316is amendedbyreplacing thephrase "revised l991"with *1977 Edition
NDS''
(y) section 2316.2 Amendments Delete Reference and Accompanying Table
Section 2316.2 is amendedbydeleting ltem}7 NDS Supplement and accompanyrng
Table 5A
(z) Section 2320.11.3 amended - Conventional Construction Provisions
(Bracing) Item 5 Deleted.
Section 2320.11.3, Item 5 (gypsum board bracing) is deleted.
7/30/zoo2 22
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(aa) Section 2320.11.3 amended - Conventional Construction Provisions
(Bracing) Item 7.
Section 2320.11.3, Item 7 is amended to read as follows:
7. Portland cement plaster on studs spaced 16 inches on center
installed in accordance with Table No. 25-1. Limited to one story structures
of Group R-3 and U-l occupancies.
Section 6. Section 18.09.010 is amended to read as follows:
18.09.010 Adoption of Uniform Mechanicat Code.
The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the
lnternational Conference of Building Officials under the title "1997 Uniform Mechanical
Code" and adopted as the "2001 Califomia Mechanical Code," including the appendices and
State of Califomia amendments thereto, hereinafter called "mechanical code," is adopted as
and for the rules, regulations and standards within this city as to all matters therein contained,
except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The appendices to the mechanical code shall
be enforceable to the same extent as if contained in the body of the code.
Section 7. Chapter 18.12 is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.12
PLUMBING CODE
18.12.0r0
18.12.020
t8.r2.025
18.12.030
18.12.035
18.12.040
18.12.050
18.12.060
18.12.070
18.12.080
18.12.090
18.12.100
Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code.
Appeals.
Subsection 311.9 added - Prohibited fittings and practices.
Section 510.7 amended - Water heater safety pans.
Section 604.1amended - Materials.
Section 604.11added - PEX.
Section 605.3.1 added - Water supply shutoff valves.
section 609.3 amended - water piping installed in or under a concrete
slab.
Section 610.8.1 added - Water service over two inches.
Section 710.1 amended - Drainage piping below main sewer level.
Section 719.7 added - Building sewer clean-out.
Section 807.2 amended - Condensate waste water disposal.
7/30t2002 23
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
t8
l9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18.12.110
18.12.115
18.12.r20
18.12.r25
Disposal of rainwater drainage.
Rainwater drainage to paved gutter.
Rainwater drainage across public sidewalk prohibited.
Elimination of existing rainwater drainage required.
18.12.010 Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code.
The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the
lnternational Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), under the title
41997 Uniform Plumbing Code" and adopted as the "California Plumbing Code, 2001
Edition," including the appendices A and D, and State of California amendments thereto,
hereinafter called "plumbing code," is adopted as and for the rules, regulations and standards
within this city as to all matters therein contained, except as otherwise provided in this
chapter. The appendices specified herein shall be enforceable to the same extent as if
contained in the body of the plumbing code.
18.12.020 Appeals.
An appeal of a denial of or a refusal to issue a permit or from any other decision of
the building official maybe taken as set forth in section 18.07.040.
18.12.025 Section 311.9 added-Prohibited fittings and practices.
Section 311.9 is added to read as follows:
311.9 Exterior Pipes. No plumbing drain vent pipe nor water, soil, waste,
or gas pipe shall be installed on, or attached to, the outside face of an exterior
wall of a residential building without the prior written permission of the
building official. Such installation shall be enclosed in such a way as to be
obscured from view.
18.12.030 Section 510.7 amended-Water heater safety pans.
Section 510.7 is amended to read as follows:
510.7 Each waterheater located in an attic, furred space, living area or other
7/30/2002 24
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
l3
l4
15
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
location where leakage would result in damage to the building or its contents
shall have a safety pan with drain. Safety pans shall be metal and be nominal
two inches in diameter larger than the water heater, with a minimum depth
oftwo inches. The drain pipe shall be three-quarter inch trade size minimum;
shall terminate outside the building foundation or, where this is not practical
or possible, at another location approved by the building inspector; and shall
have a continuous minimum slope throughout its length of one-quarter inch,
per foot away from the water heater.
18.12.035 Section 604.lamended-Materials.
Section 604.1 is amended to read as follows:
604.1 Water distribution pipe, building supplywater pipe and fittings shall
be ofbrass, copper, cast iron, galvanized malleable iron, galvanized wrought
iron, galvanized steel, or other approved materials. Asbestos-cement, CPVC,
PE, PVC, or PEX water pipe manufactured to recognized standards may be
used for cold water distribution systems outside a building. CPVC, PEX
water pipe, tubing, and fittings, manufactured to recognized standards may
be used for hot and cold water distribution systems within a building. All
materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices
shall be of a like material, except where otherwise approved by the Building
Official.
18.12.040 Section604.lladded-PEX.
Section 604.11 is added to read as follows:
604.11PEX. Cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) tubing shall be marked with
the appropriate standard designation(s) listed in Table 14-1 for which the
tubing has been listed or approved. PEX tubing shall be installed in
compliance with the provisions of this section.
7/30/2002 25
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
l4
15
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
604.ll.1PEX Fittings. Metal lnsert Fittings and Metal Compression
Fittings used with PEX tubing shall be manufactured to and marked
in accordance with the standards for the fittings in Table 14-1.
604.11.2 Water Heater Connections. PEX tubing shall not be
installed within the first eighteen (18) inches (457 mm) of piping
connected to a water heater.
18.12.050 Section 605.3 amended -Water supply shutoff valves.
Section 605.3 is amended to read as follows:
605.3 A gate shutoff valve shall be installed on each water supplypipe at an
accessible point where such supply enters a building. In multi-unit residential
buildings, a gate shutoff valve shall be installed on each water supply pipe at
an accessiblepointwhere such supplyenters each apartment or dwelling unit;
or, where an apartment or dwelling unit is supplied by a vertical riser, a
separate accessible shutoff valve may be provided at each plumbing fixture
in the unit in lieu of the shutoff valve on the main supply to the unit.
18.12.060 Section 609.3 amended-Water piping installed in or under a concrete
slab.
The first parugraph of Section 609.3 is amended to read as follows:
Water piping shall not be installed in or under a concrete floor slab within a
building without prior written approval of the building official. When such
approval is obtained, such piping shall be installed in accordance with the
fo llowing requirements :
18.12.070 Section 610.8.1 added-Water services over two inches.
A new subsection 610.8.1 is added to read as follows:
7/3012002 26
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
l3
t4
15
16
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
610.8.1 Water Services Over 2 inches. Design details, methods and
materials for construction of water services over 2 inches in diameter shall
conform with the specifications for the construction of such work as
compiled by the city engineer. These specifications may be changed from
time to time at the option of the city engineer, but such changes shall in no
way effect the validity of the regulations or requirements contained therein
or the regulations and requirements of this code.
18.12.080 Section 710.1amended-Drainage piping below main sewer level.
Section 710.1 is amended to read as follows:
710.1 Drainage piping serving fixture(s) which have flood level rim(s) less
than twelve inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or
flushing inlet cover at the public sewer system serving such drainage piping
shall be protected from backflow of sewage by the installation of a backwater
valve approved by the building official. Fixtures above such elevation shall
not discharge through the backwater valve without prior written approval of
the building official.
18.12.090 Section 719.7 added-Building sewer clean-out.
A new section 719.7 is added to read as follows:
719.7 When a building sewer is located under a street, alley or easement,
there shall be provided a cleanout, installed flush with the sidewalk level next
to curb; or, if no curb or sidewalk exist, then the cleanout must be located
outside of the lot line. The cleanout riser shall be of materials specified by
the city engineer, shall be the same size as the drain it serves, shall be
connected to the building drain by a wye, shall be brought up to the level of
the ground, and shall be terminated at the top with a cleanout fitting as
specified by the city engineer. If the riser terminates at concrete sidewalk a
7t30t2002 27
1
2
a
-)
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
t3
t4
15
l6
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cast iron sidewalk box with loose cover fitting with brass screws shall be
installed. The minimum size for a cleanout riser shall be four inch trade size
pipe.
18.12.100 Section 807.2 amended-Condensate waste water disposal.
Section 807.2 is amended to read as follows:
807.2 Condensate from air cooling coils and comfort cooling equipment not
intended to be used for the storage or handling of food or drink shall be
collected and discharged to a storm sewer or otherpoint of disposal approved
by the building official.
Termination of such drains shall be made by an air break. Condensate
drain lines in sizes of one and one-quarter inch and larger shall be assembled
using approved drainage pipe and fittings.
Condensate waste water shall not drain over or upon a sidewalk,
pedestrian ramp or the like, or a public way.
18.12.110 Disposal of rainwater drainage.
Rainwater from roof or other approved areas exposed to rainwater may be drained
into the storm drainage system, but shall not drain into any sewer intended for sanitary
sewage.
18.12.115 Rainwater drainage to paved gutter.
Rainwater from roofs and other approved areas exposed to rainwater may drain into
apublic street gutter, provided that such gutter is paved and runs to a catchbasin connected
to a public storm drain, and provided further that such drainage has the approval of the city
engineer or other public authority having jurisdiction over public streets or public storm
drains.
7t30/2002 28
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18.12.120 Rainwater drainage across public sidewalk prohibited.
No rainwater from roofs, or other rainwater drainage of premises, shall discharge
upon a public sidewalk. When it is desired to conduct rainwater from a building or premises
to a public street gutter, the outside underground drainage piping shall be vitrified clay pipe,
ABS, PVC, galvanized wrought iron pipe, galvanized steel pipe, approved concrete pipe,
asbestos cement sewer pipe, cast iron pipe or other materials approved by the building
official. When claypipe, ABS, PVC, asbestos cement sewer pipe or approved concrete pipe
is used, such pipe shall be a minimum oftwo feet horizontally from the building and one foot
below the official grade. Water leaders connected to such background drainage pipe which
are on the outside of the building wall that abuts on a public thoroughfare, shall be
constructed of galvarized wrought iron pipe, galvanized steel pipe, or cast iron pipe for a
distance of not less than five feet vertically above the Official grade. See Section
18.08.010(i) for exception for such drainage in R-l districts.
18.12.125 Elimination ofnonconformingrainwaterdrainage required.
Every existing drainage of rainwater into a sanitary sewer in violation of the
provisions of this chapter shall be altered or terminated or replaced so as to conform to the
provisions of this chapter.
Section 8. Chapter 18.16 is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.16
ELECTRICAL CODE
18.16.010
18.16.020
18.16.030
Adoption of National Electrical Code.
Section 230-70(4) amended - Main switch accessible from exterior.
Exterior lighting restricted.
18.16.010 Adoption of National Electrical Code.
The rules, regulations and standards printed in one volume and published by the National Fire
7/30t2002 29
I
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
t5
t6
L7
18
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Protection Association under the title "National Electrical Code, 2002 Edition" with amendments as
contained in the "2001 California Electrical Code", including the appendices, and the Uniform
Administrative Code Provisions (I.C.B.O.) of said code, are adopted as and for the rules, regulations
and standards within this city as to matters therein contained except as provided in this chapter. The
mandatory requirements of the appendices to the code shall be enforceable to the same extent as if
contained in the body of the code. Article 80 is expressly not adopted.
18.16.020 Section 230.70(AXl) amended-Main switch accessible from exterior.
Section 230.70(AX1) is amended to read as follows:
(1) Main Switch Location. The main switch location shall be accessible from the
exterior of a building. If, due to structural or architectural conditions, it is not possible
to make the main switch accessible from the building exterior a shunt trip
disconnecting all active electrical conductors shall be installed at an accessible exterior
location.
18.16.030 Exteriorlightingrestricted.
(a) Exterior lighting on all residential and commercial properties shall be designed and
located so that the cone of light and/or glare from the lighting element is kept entirely on the property
or below the top of any fence, edge or wall.
(b) On all residential properties exterior lighting outlets and fixtures shall not be located
more than nine (9) feet above adjacent grade or required landing; walls or portions of walls shall not
be floodlit; only shielded light fixtures which focus light downward shall be allowed, except for
illuminated street numbers required by the fire department.
(c) Variances to the provisions of this section may be approved by the planning
commission, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 25.16 of this code, except that notice of the
application for the variance shall only be given to property owners within fifty feet.
(d) This section shall not applyto signs having an approved permit for an illuminated sign
713012002 30
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
l3
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
pursuant to Title 22 of this code.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of
2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COTINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C :\FILES\ORDINANC\unifcode2002.ord.wpd
713012002 31
Section 9. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 7bITEM #
MTG.
DATE 8-5-O2
SUBJECT:
BY
BY
Adoption of the 2001 California Fire Code (2000 Fire Code)
Introduction
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the 2001 California Fire Code (2000 Uniform Fire Code) with
local amendments.
A. Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance.
B. Waive further reading of the ordinance.
C. Introduce the proposed ordinance.
D. Direct the city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed
adoption.
BACKGROUND:
The 2001 Edition of the Califomia Fire Code (CFC) is the first edition of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) with
California Amendments that was not published jointly with the International Conference of Building Officials
(ICBO). ICBO opted to not publish the 2000 UFC and participate in the development of the lnternational Fire
Code with the International Code Council. The Western Fire Chiefs updated the 1997 UFC without the ICBO
to incorporate new and revised standards for the safeguarding to a reasonable degree oflife and property from
the hazards of fire and explosion arising from the storage, handling and use of hazardous substances, materials
and devices, and form conditions hazardous to life or property. The majority of these changes have little to no
effect on the City of Burlingame. The State of California has named the 2000 UFC as the basis for the 2001
Edition of the CFC.
The model code is written and published as minimum requirement to meet all building and public safety
standards. Burlingame has some unique topographical, geographical, and climatic conditions, which allow for
further modification to accommodate local needs.
Adoption of this ordinance will, for the most part, retain existing local amendments. However, there have
been some changes.
A fee will now be assessed for recovery of inspection costs associated with new construction and
fire permits. The Fire Department curently does not issue permits for the design review and
installation of fire protection systems. A fee is assessed by the Building Department for the plan
check of these types of systems. Currently the Fire Department does not recover expenses for
conducting field construction inspections for the various types of systems required to be installed
throughout the city.
I
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DArE: July 30r 2002
FRoM: Fire Department
2
aJ
4.
Clarification is now provided for Fire Department accessibility requirements through the
prescriptive requirements specific to fire lanes, addressing, and lock boxes.
The City of Burlingame Fire Department is attempting to keep pace with other local fire
departments within the county. The Fire Department is proposing to lower the threshold for the
requirement to install fire sprinklers down to 2,000 square feet.
The State of California has lowered the threshold for required fire alarm systems in multi-
residential facilities from "16 units or an occupant load of 20 or more" to "5 units or an occupant
load of 11 or more."
ATTACHMENTi
Comparison of Fire Sprinirler Ordinances.
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
T4
15
I6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINAI\CE No.
ORDINAIICE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 17 TO ADOPT
THE 2OO1 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
The CITY COI-INCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows
Section 1. The City of Burlingame is located between the Santa Cruz Mountains foothills
and San Francisco Bay, with a number of substantial creeks flowing through highly developed
residential and industrial areas. It is surrounded by large areas of open space maintained in natural
condition, as well as having a significant natural canyon in the center of the residential area. The
City normally receives no measurable precipitation between May and October , and it can often
extend into late October or early November. During this period, ayerage temperafures average
between 70" F and 90o F, and strong winds come down the foothills. These conditions eliminate
most of the moisture in the natural vegetation and heavilywooded hillsides. The area also suffers
periodic droughts that extend the dry periods to other months of the year. In addition, many wood
roofs over wood construction predominate the residential areas. The City is directly east of the
San Andreas Fault, and much of the highly developed part of the City is located along the front of
the Bay, some on fiIl. The foothill areas have a variety of soil formations with steep canyons and
heavy precipitation. Fires in the community could quickly spread because of the extensive,
natural vegetation throughout the City. The City has a number of highly developed commercial
areas with older buildings, and an industrial area that is filled with mixed uses utilizing various
materials that could be highly hazardous. In addition, heavily traveled approach and departure
routes for San Francisco Intemational Airport are immediately adjacent or over the City. Much of
the residential areas that are immediately adjacent to woodland and canyon are served by narrow
one- or two-lane roads with confused access caused by the steepness of the terrain. Access by fire
suppression equipment is extremely limited by both topography and improved access. It is only
through strong building standards and effective fire prevention and containment programs that
citizens will receive the protection they deserve, and that citizens will be able to obtain reasonably
priced insurance for their homes and businesses. In seeking to attain these goals, the fire
l_
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
lt
t2
13
t4
15
t6
t7
18
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
prevention standards in Title 17 are adopted.
Section 2. In addition, in order to provide appropriate, clear information to applicants for
construction approvals, Section 17 .04.020 and 17 .04.023 are adopted to conform Title 17 to Title
18 and the Zorung Code requirements established in the Municipal Code.
Section 3. Section 17.040.010 is amended to read as follows:
17"04.010 Adoption of text of Uniform Fire Code.
There is adopted by the city for the purpose ofprescribing regulations governing conditions
hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, that certain code which contains building
standards known as the 2001 CaliforniaFire Code (Uniform Fire Code, 2000 Edition as amended
bythe State of California), and the non-building standards known as the Uniform Fire Code, 2000
Edition together with all appendices and the State of California amendments thereto save and
except such portions as are in this chapter deleted, modified or amended.
Section 4. Section 17 .04.020 is amended to read as follows:
17.04.020 Sections 103.1.1.1 and 103.1.1.2 added -- Plan review and certificates of
occupancy.
New sections 103.1.1.1 and 103.I.L2 are added to read as follows:
103.1.1.1 All plans submitted to the Building Official for a permit shall be
reviewed by the Fire Chief to determine compliance with the Uniform Fire Code.
Upon his review a written report shall be retumed to the Building Official listing
deficiencies or compliance with the Code.
103.1.1.2 NofinalinspectionbytheBuildingOfficialastoalloranyportionofa
development shall be deemed complete, and no certificate of occupancy or
temporary certificate of occupancy shall be issued unless and until the installation
ofthe prescribed fire protection facilities and access ways have been completed and
approved by the Fire Chief.
z
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
t3
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 5. Section 17 .04.023 is amended to read as follows:
17.04.023 Section 105.9 added -- Fees.
Section 105.9 is added to read as follows:
105.9 Fees and Special Requirements.
1. The fees for the permits and other services shall be as established by
resolution ofthe Burlingame City Council as amended from time to time. The fees
shall be set to cover the cost of the Fire Department to review and inspect the
intended activities, operations or functions. The fees must be paid to the City of
Burlingame prior to engaging in the listed activities, operations, or functions.
EXCEPTION: 1. The applicant for a given permit shall be exempt
from the payment of such fees if they can show proof of non-profit
status.
2. The applicant for a given permit shall be exempt from the
payment when the work to be conducted is for properties or events
owned by the City of Burlingame.
2. In the case ofmultiple permits for an applicant, the permit applicant will
be charged the single highest listed rate of all the permits required. The other
permitable items will be charged at a rate of 50Yo of the listed fee as long as the
permits are for the same address.
3. Where processes or materials are inherent with a permitable item,
subsequent fees may be waived at the discretion of fire chief.
4. Permit fees charged cover one fire and life safety inspection and one
follow-up re-inspection to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the
Uniform Fire Code for which the permit is issued. A fee will be charged for each
subsequent re-inspection after the first inspection at a rate of $11.25 per every
quarter hour.
5. Any person, group, organization, institution or business failing to pay the
applicable fees under this Article shall after 30 days of the due date, for either
3
existing or new permit applicants, shall be issued a citation for non-payment of the
required permit fee. The penalty for all permit payments delinquent after 30 days
shall be a doubling of the original fee.
Section 6. Section 17 .04.025 is added to read as follows:
17.04.025 Sections 901.4.2.1 added -Required FireDepartmentAccess.
Sections 901.4.2.1is added as follows:
901.4.2.1ldentification Of Fire Lanes. Designation of the fire lanes shall be by
one of the following means:
1. By a white sign measuring at least 12 inches by 18 inches posted
immediately adjacent thereto and clearly visible. It should clearly state, in red
letters not less than one inch in height, that the space is a fire lane and parking is
prohibited.
2. By outlining and hash marking the area in contrasting colors clearly
marking it with the words ',Fire Lane - No parking".
3. By identiffing the space with a red curb upon which the words "Fire
Lane - No Parking" are stenciled every 15 feet.
(a) Both sides of a fire lanes shall be red curbed when the fire lane
is twenty (20) to twenty-eight (28) feet in width.
(b) At least one side of a fire lane shall be red curbed and stenciled
when the fire lane is over twenty eight (28) and up to thirty-six (36) feet in
width.
(c) Curbs need not be painted red nor stenciled when the fire lane
is more than thirty-six (36) feet in width.
Section 7. Section 17.04.026 is added to read as follows:
17.04.026 section 901.4.4 amended - premises ldentification.
Sections 901.4.4 of this code is amended to read as follows:
4
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
t3
t4
15
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
z)
24
25
26
27
28
901.4.4 Premises identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed
on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and
legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast
with their background and shall be either internally or externally illuminated in all
new construction. Numbers shall be as follows:
1. Minimum of one- half-inch (%") stroke by two and one-half inches (2-
U2")hidh.
2. When the structure is thirty-six (36) to fifty (50) feet from the street or
fire department access, a minimum of one-half-inch(/2") stroke by six inches (6")
high is required.
3. When the structure is more than fifty (50) feet from the street or fire
apparatus access, a minimum of one-half-inch (%") strike bynine inches (9") high
is required.
901.4.4.1 Multi-Tenant Buildings. Numbers or letters shall be designated on all
occupancies within a building. Size shall be one-quarter-inch (ll4) stroke by two
inches (2") high and on a contrasting background. Directional address numbers or
letters shall be provided. Said addresses or numbers shall be posted at a height no
greater than 5 feet, 6 inches (5' 6") above the finished floor and shall be either
internally or extemally illuminated in all new construction.
901.4.4.2 Rear Addressing. When required by the chief, approved numbers or
addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to
be plainly visible and legible from the fire apparatus road at the back of a property.
Number stroke and size shall comply with 901.4.4.
Section 8. Section 17.040.028 is amended to read as follows:
17.04,028 Section 902.4 amended - Key Boxes.
Section 902.4 is amended by adding new sections 902.4.1through 902.4.3:
902.4.1 Installation. When key boxes are required by the chief, such boxes shall
5
be mounted at72 inches above finished floor within five feet of the latching side
of the main entrance to a structure or facility. In addition, a decal shall be provided
and installed adjacent to the key lock/latching device.
902.4.2 Keys. The key provided shall be a master key to all spaces including
multi-tenant spaces. Additional keys shall be included for elevator control, fire
alarm control panels, and fire sprinkler control valve access.
EXCEPTION: Multi-tenant spaces which provide a key box for
each tenant and installed per Section902.4.l.
Electronic card keys and codes may not be utilized as a substitute for manual keys.
EXCEPTION: When electronic locks release upon loss of
electrical power a manual key need not be provided.
902.4.3 HMIS. When required by the chief, a current copy of the Hazardous
Materials Inventory Statement shall be kept within the keybox.
Section 9. Section 17.04.030 is amended to read as follows:
17.04.030 Sections 1003.2.1.1 and 1003.2.1.2 added--Required installations of automatic
fire extinguisher systems.
Sections 1003.2.1.1 and 1003.2.1.2. are added to read as follows:
1003.2.1.1 A1l new buildings with a total building floor area in excess of two
thousand (2,000) square feet or more than two (2) stories in height shall be
protected by an approved automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system, with the
following provisions:
l. The shut-off valves and the water flow devices shall be supervised, and
their operations shall transmit a signal to an approved central station.
EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
2.ln all buildings more than two (2) stories in height, shut-off valves and
water flow devices shall be supervised through an annunciator board at a location
approved by the Fire Department.
EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
6
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
13
t4
l5
t6
T7
18
l9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. If there is a local fire alarm in the building, the operation of the water
flow devices shall activate the local alarm system.
4. Any local fire alarm system shall be designed to be heard by all occupants
of the building and shall, when activated, transmit an alarm to an approved central
station.
5. Area separation walls may be used for area increases as per the Uniform
Building Code, but shall not be used to separate buildings or structures in lieu ofthe
automatic sprinkler systems required by this section.
1003.2.1.2 All existing buildings with a total building floor area in excess of two
thousand (2,000) square feet or more than two (2) stories in height shall be
retroactively protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system when costs
of additions or alterations for which a building permit is required will exceed
seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or twenty percent (20%) of the building's
replacement cost as defined by the Building Valuation Data published bimonthly
in the Intemational Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) Building Standards
magazinepublication, whichever is greater, with the following specific provisions:
l. The shut-off valves and the water flow devices shall be supervised, and
their operations shall transmit a signal to an approved central station.
EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
2.In all buildings more than two (2) stories in height, shut-off valves and
water flow devices shall be supervised through an annunciator board at a location
approved by the Fire Department.
EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
3. If there is a local fire alarm in the building, the operation of the water
flow devices shall activate the local alarm system.
4. Any local fire alarm system shall be designed to be heard by all occupants
of the building and shall, when activated, transmit an alarm to an approved central
station.
7
5. Area separation walls maybe used for area increases as per the Uniform
Building Code and may be used to divide a portion of the building that is not
involved with a remodel or renovation for purposes of this section.
6. In the event that a building is partially retrofitted with an approved
automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section, the building
shall complete the fire extinguishing system retrofit throughout the unprotected
building interior areas within six (6) years from completing the initial partial
retrofit.
7. The cost of alterations used in calculating the replacement cost value
formula shall not be cumulative with regard to individual alterations in a building
unless either of the following two circumstances apply:
(a) Where more than one (l) alteration for which building permits
are required are made within a two (2) year period and said alterations are
made to the premises of the same occupant. In such circumstances, the sum
of these alterations construction costs during this two (2) year period shall
be aggregated for the purpose of calculating the replacement cost value
formula.; or
(b) Where more than one (l) alteration for which building permits
have been issued have not yet received final Building Department approval.
ln such circumstances, the sum ofthese issued but not yet finalized building
alterations' construction costs shall be aggregated for the purpose of
calculation of the replacement cost value formula.
EXCEPTIONS: The cost of additions and alterations used
in calculating the replacement cost value formula shall be exclusive
of the cost to design and install an automatic fire sprinkler
extinguishing system pursuant to this section; building roof
repair/replacement; building heating and./or cooling unit
repair/replacement; and any other federal, state and local
8
1
2
aJ
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
r3
t4
15
l6
l7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
construction code upgrade requirements includingbutnot limited to
the American Disability Act architectural barrier removal
requirements, Title 24 handicap comp li ance requirements, sei smic
retrofit requirements, asbestos and other hazardous material
abatement, etc.
Section 10. Section 17 .04.040 is amended to read as follows:
17.04.040 Section 1006.2.1.4 added--Local fire alarm requirements.
A new section 1006.2.1.4 is added to read as follows:
1006.2.1.4 Local Fire alarm requirements.
1. An approved fire alarm system shall be provided in all occupancies of
three (3) stories or more in height or over twenty thousand (20,000) square feet.
2. Fire alarm systems shall be annunciated at a central panel. This panel
shall be visible to the Fire Department without making entry into the building; a
remote annunciation panel may be used for this. The location of the panel should
be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
3. Whenever a local alarm system is installed and maintained in any
building to wam occupants in case of emergency, a durable sign ofno less than four
inches by six inches (4" x 6") shall be installed and maintained above each fire
alarm pull station to read as follows:
Local Fire Alarm Only
After Operating Notiff
BURLINGAME FIRE DEPARTMENT
9ll
4. In all instances where a fire alarm system is required to be monitored,
every such system shall require a serial-numbered certificate from a nationally
recognized listing service.
9
I
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
t2
13
t4
15
16
l7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 1 1. Section 17 .04.060 is amended to read as follows:
17.04.060 SectionS00l.Tamended--Identificationsigns.
Section 8001.7 is amended by adding the following paragraph at the end of the section:
Two NFPA 704 Diamonds shall be placed on buildings so that they are
clearly visible from at least two directions of travel. The signs shall measure at
least fifteen inches by fifteen inches (15" x 15"). The signs shall not be placed on
windows. When NFPA Diamonds are required for interior doors, the signs shall
be applied to the doors at a level no higher than the door knob. The signs for
interior doors shall measure at least six inches by six inches (6" x 6"). The fire
chiefmay require fewer or more NFPA 704 Diamonds if the building confi guration
or size makes it reasonably necessary.
Mayor
I, ANNE MUSSO, CityClerk ofthe CityofBurlingame, do herebycertifythat the
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day
of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_ day of 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ty
10
Section 12. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
COMPARISON OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
SPRINKLER ORDINANCES
AHJ COMMERCIAL (Including Group R-l Occupancies)RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
NEW EXISTING NEW EXISTING
Brisbane
Fire Department
All buildings except uninhabitable sheds <200
sqft.
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement of the existing floor area or;
-50olo improvement value or;
-Increase ofbuilding height over 40 feet or;
-Change in use to more hazardous use.
All new homes
-Over 2,500 sqft or;
-Over 40 feet in height.
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-70o/o improvement to existing floor area and;
-total to more than 2,500 sqft
Burlingame
Fire Department
All buildings
-Over 2,000 sqft. or;
-More than 2 stories in height
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-20o/o improvement value or $75,000 or;
-total to more than 2,000 sqft
All buildings
-Over 2,000 sqft. or;
-More than 2 stories in height
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-20Yo improvement value or $75,000 or;
-total to more than 2,000 sqft
CDF
San Mateo County
Fire Department
All buildings over 1,000 sqft.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-75%o improvement value and;
-total to more than 1,000 sqft
All buildings over 1,000 sqft.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-75oh improvement value and;
-total to more than 1,000 sqft
Daly City
Fire Department
All buildings except sheds <200 sqft. and
detached carports/greenhouses.
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement to existing floor area or;
-Change in use to more hazardous use.
All buildings except sheds <200 sqft. and
detached carports/greenhouses.
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50olo improvement to existing floor area
Foster City
Fire Department
All new buildings Additions, alterations, or remodels
-25Yoinprovement to existing floor area or;
-50% improvement value or;
-+30 feet in height.
All new buildiugs.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement to existing floor area
Half Moon Bay
Fire Protection
District
No ordinance All occupancies except group R & U when
Additions, alterations, or remodels
-total to more than 2,500 sqft. or;
-Three stories or more.
No ordinance No requirement
Hillsborough
Fire Department
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-+$65,000 improvement value or;
-total more than 1,500 or additions of 1,500sqft
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-+$65,000 improvement value or;
-total more than 1,500 or additions of l,500sqft
Millbrae
Fire Department
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-25Yo additionor 50%o to existing floor area and;
-total area 3,750 or more or 3 stories in height.
All new buildings.No requirement
Pacifica
Fire Department
All new buildings except detached Group U-1
not exceeding 1,000 sqft.
Additions, alterations, or remodels except Group
R-l <500 sqft.
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement to existing floor area or;
-total addition more than 500 sqft.
-total addition less than 500 sqft./addition only.
Redwood City
Fire Department
All new buildings over 3,000 sqft.-Change in use to more hazardous use'All new buildings No requirement
San Bruno
Fire Department
No ordinance No requirement No requirement No requirement
San Mateo
Fire Department
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement to existing floor area
-total addition more than 200 only.
All new buildings.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement to existing floor area
-total addition more than 200 sqft./addition only
South County
Fire Authority
All new buildings except grouP H, I and U;
-Group R-l over 5,000 sqft.
Existing group R-l when one or more apply:
-Change of ownership or;
-Change in use to more hazardous use'
-Any addition 507o of value of existi4g-
Al1 new homes over 3,000 sqft.No requirement
South San Francisco
Fire Department
All new occupancies when:
-Over 7,500 sqft. or;
-Over 40 feet in height or;
-Three or more stories in
No requirement A1l new homes when:
-Over 7,500 sqft. or;
-Over 40 feet in height or;
-Three or more stories in height.
No requirement
Woodside Fire
Protection Distict
All buildings over 1,000 sqft.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement value and;
-total to more than 1,000 sqft
All buildings over 1,000 sqft.Additions, alterations, or remodels
-50% improvement value and;
-total to more than 1,000 sqft
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AI{D CITY COUNCIL
JULY 24,2002
AGENDA
7cITEM #
MTG.
DATE
TO:SUBMITTED
DATE:
BY
BYFROM:CITY PLAIINER
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF CITTZEN PARTICIPATION
BAYFRONT SPECIFIC AREA PLAN.
R THE UPDATE OF THE
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should review the Prospectus for the Update of the Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan and
BayfrontlAnza SAP Update Time Line which includes the meeting schedule for the program; and direct staff
regarding representatives and residents to participate in the Citizens Advisory Committee to work with staff
and the public in preparing the up date of this planning document.
BACKGROUND:
In May 2002, the City Council directed staff to undertake an update of the city's Specific Area Plan for the
Bayfront and Anza areas. To implement that direction staff has done the following:
o Prepared a description of the proposed planning program including a time line;
o Formed a subcommittee of the Planning Commission which met and reviewed the proposed planning
program and meeting schedule;
o Contracted with and sent into the field to collect data, consultants in the areas of economics, biology,
noise, wind, and traffic and circulation. Staff is in the field updating the land use inventory for the area
and preparing maps of infrastructure.
An important component of the update of the current Bayfront/Anza SAP is a Citizen's Advisory Committee.
This committee will work regularly with staff in reviewing data, evaluating options and developing policy for
the future land use and development in the planning area. The Advisory Committee will also sponsor and
participate in the three public workshops designed to involve all interested members of the public in the
development of the plan. These three workshops will focus on: development policy, land use alternatives and
design objectives or themes for the area. The workshops are spread through out the year long planning
program with the first scheduled for the September-October time period. (See attached Bayfront/Anza Specific
Area Plan Update Timeline) . Based on the timeline staff anticipates that the Advisory Committee (three
members of which are on the Planning Commission subcommittee) will attend at least 10 meetings between
September 2002 and May 2003. The Advisory Committee members will also be expected to participate in the
presentation of the draft plan to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Because participation in the Advisory Committee represents a substantial time commitment over the next 9
months, staff has identified afl array of interests which might make up a representative committee to oversee
the preparation of this update of the plan. Staff has spoken with Planning Commission and Council members
about people they think might be interested, those names are noted next to the interests below. In some cases
there is more than one name mentioned. It might be good to have a short list for each interest since some
1
REWEW OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROGRAIT FOR THE APDATE OF THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC AREA PLAN.
August 5,2002
people identified may not have the time to participate. From this list Staffwill contact people to represent
each interest and bring the final list back to Council at your first meeting in September.
For workable size an Advisory Committee of twelve (12) is suggested; however, Council may pick any size
you wish. The interests which have been identified from discussion so far are listed below. Where
representatives have been mentioned, their names are included. No one on the list has been contacted
regarding their interest in participating in the planning program.
Planning Commission Chris Keele
Ann Keighran
Stan Vistica
(Bayfront/Anza Subcommittee)
Hotel Industry.Bruce Carlton
Colman Conneely
Stan Moore
(choose one)
Property Owner:
Office:
Anza area
(choose two)
Skip Green
Wilson Development
Bayfront area
Warehouse:
OM zone
(choose one)
Restaurant (destination)(choose one)
(choose one)
Resident:
Recreation User
Bayfront knowledge
Covalent
Michael Barber*
Chuck Mink
(choose one/two)
Leasing Agent Ross Bruce
Ken Housley
(choose one)
City Commissions:
Beautification:
Park and Recreation:
Traffic Parking and Safety
(choose one/two)
*Burlingame School Board, bicycle commuter, works on Mitten Road
ATTACHMENTS:
Prospectus for the Update of the Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan with Area Maps and Timeline
1
Airport Oriented Land Use/tenant:
Prospectus for the Update of the BayfrontlAnza Specific Area Plan
History
During the 1960's a developer filled about 100 acres of the bay east of the Wastewater
Treatment/Sanitary landfill area. In the 1969 General Plan, which was created and
adopted during the period when filling was occulring, the new fill was designated
Waterfront Commercial, but the proposed land use was vague: "the waterfront
commercial uses should be limited to activities that either depend on waterfront location
or directly benefit from location on the waterfront".
The developer at the time was proposing to build out the newly filled area in similar
character to the area between US 101 and Bayshore Highway, which was filled in the
1950's and was developing with tilt-up warehouses and low rise, class B office buildings.
The City Council at the time observed that this new fill area was one of the few large,
scenic vacant areas with water frontage along San Francisco Bay, and had revenue
potential to the city which was greater than a light industrial area. Since the area between
US 101 and Bayshore was not built out at the time fill was completed in the Anza area,
the property owners in this area were tremendously concerned about the limitations of
access to the area posed by the Broadway interchange, the only regional access to the
area within Burlingame city limits. The residents of Burlingame were concerned about
retaining and developing community based recreational access along the shoreline, but
were unwilling to acquire land or pay for the improvements and their maintenance.
In 1980 all these interests came together. The result was the adoption of the City's first
Specific Area Plan. A specific area plan is a "window" in the City's General Plan. A
specific area plan overlays both the General Plan and zoning for an area, refining both.
For example, the General Plan designates the bay side of Bayshore Highway and the
Anza area as Waterfront Commercial and the west side of Bayshore Highway to US 101
as industrial and oflice use; Bayside Park/Wastewater Treatment Plant and the sanitary
landfill were designated as future community park. With the Specific Area Plan these
land uses were more finely tuned. The specifi c area plan set out specific, limited uses
for particular parcels and groups of parcels, established densities less than allowed by
existing zoning and established physical design parameters for each parcel or group of
parcels. Most particularly, the land use standards in the SAP overlaid the zoning. For
ixample, the C-4 zoningallows oflices at an FAR of 2.0, but in the SAP area the
maximum FAR is limited to .9 for offices. The SAP also established guidelines for mass,
bulk and landscaping which were greater than those established by the zoning
regulations. At the time the Bayfront/Anza SAP was adopted, it was the only area in
which the city had set out development design guidelines.
Prospectusfor the Updote of the Bayfront/Anza Speciftc Area Plan July 12,2002
Original Planning Objectives and Approach for the Area East of US 101
In June of 1981 the City Council adopted the BayfrontlAnza Specific Area plan for the
portion of the city east of US 101. The plan was unique because the land use densities
(the carryingcapacity of the land) were based on the number of kips generated by the use
at the critical intersections in the circulation system rather than on the physical
limitations of the site.
In the past, roadway capacity for land use planning had been based on the capacity of
travel lanes. This often resulted in unexpected traffic stagnation at the most frequently
used intersections. To address the real issue ofmaintaining acceptable access and
internal circulation sufficient for in-fill and new development, the circulation capacity
for the BayfronUArza SAP was based on the capacity of the most frequently used
intersections. By setting aside the portion of intersection capacity being used by existing
development, a measure of the remaining capacity available for fufure development was
established. Land uses and densities of land uses were based on the-number of p.m. peak
hour trips each would consume of the remaining capacity of the 'crffieal' intersection (or
intersections) which serve that site. The plan was based on the objective of maintaining a
service level of low-C on the roadway system east of US l0l in Burlingame.
Planning on the basis of combining land use density and circulation system capacity has
been very effective over the years of development in the area east of US 101 in
Burlingame. This success is the reason that the City is now focusing on an "update" of
the SAP rather than developing a new SAP. The update of the plan will be based on the
approaches of the original BayfronUAnza SAP.
Program to Update the BayfronilAnza Specific Area PIan
It has been twenty years since the SAP was adopted and, despite successful
implementation of the Burlingame's BayfronVAnza SAP, the environment around the
city has changed. US l0l itself has become clogged; in part becauqe other cities have
intensively developed their bayfront properties with destination uses such as offices.
BART has come on to the scene. The influence of the growing airport on the area has
caused a shift in demand from industriaUtransshipment support to traveler/office activity.
Expansion at the airport has siphoned offsome of the revenue generating land uses (car
rental) and left the city with non-revenue generating, traffic generating support activities
(car rental storage). New indushies like bio-technology have spawned new kinds of
quasi-industrial activity such as offrce/laboratory incubator space.
Council decided that after 20 years it was time to look at what we have in the
Bayfront/Anza area and see how we can build on it to secure a viable future. Since the
present plan has been so effective, it was decided to build on the premise of the
circulation based original plan using that model, combined with economic study to
project viable land uses, then to develop new development goals and policies, a new land
2
Prospectasfor the Update of the Bayfront/Anza Speciftc Area Plon JuIy 12,2002
use map and densities with new, refined design guidelines, and new implementation
tools.
Updating the BayfronUAnza SAP
The study area for the BayfrontlAnzaArea SAP includes all the land in the City of
Burlingame on the east side of US l0l. Two square miles of the study area are under
water in San Francisco Bay. The remainder of the area is divided into three sections: the
Bayfront area between the Airport/Bayshore Highway/lOl off ramp and the city line at
the center of El Portal Creek; the Anza Extension which includes Bayside Park (both
parts) and the Waste Water Treatment Plant; and the AnzaArea from the east side of
Bayside Park (the old sanitary landfill) west to the city line at Airport Blvd. and Lang
Road.
Because of the short time frame for the planning program establisfugel by the City Council
and staffs familiarity with implementing the current plan and traffieanalyzer, which is
the key to effectively using the current plan, the update of the plan is being prepared by
City staff. Council has instructed that the update be completed (draft ready for public
hearing) in one year's time (May 2003). To meet this charge the following program for
developing the BayfrontlArua SAP has been devised.
B ackground s tudies (July 2 002 - September 2 00 2 )
The purpose of the background studies is to update the information on which the plan is
based. The background sfudies also serve as the "setting" portion of the program
environmental document which is a mandatorypart of an SAP.
Over the years of implementing the BayfrontlAtua Area SAP a number of things in the
physical environment have changed or shifted in importance. Some of the newer issues
are: changes to the noise environment; impact of development on prevailing winds over
water; changes in aviation approaches and possibly runway configuration; and changes
in ranges of rare and endanger species ofplants and animals. Some of the changes have
to do with transportation, including access, the increasing congestion of US. 101, the
capacity and limitations of the Broadway interchange, and the extension of BART, along
with changes to the operation of CalTrain and runway and other expansions at SFIA
which will affect regional access and markets for land uses within the sfudy area.
Finally, some of the new issues relate to new and different concerns by regulating
agencies such as the Bay Conservation and Development Commission, the San Francisco
Regional Water Quality Board (I{PDES and STOPPP), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer
and the Califomia Department ofFish and Game, among others.
The background work will include collecting information about the existing
environments which affect the area. Each environment will be documented in a written
report and mapped. The maps will be designed so that composites can be created to
assist in understanding how the various constraints affect the different portions of the
|'-
3
Prospectu:s for the Update of the Bayfront/Atza SpeciJic Area Plan fu$ D,2002
study area. Specialists in the following areas have been hired to do this part of the work:
wind, habitats, noise, land use market opportunities (economist), traffic, circulation, and
access (traffic engineer to update and apply the traffic analyzer to land use altematives),
City staff will examine infrastructure limitations, existing land use and implications of
existing zoning. An initial evaluation of the existing planning goals and policies will
also be included.
The product of this work will be the Background Data Report: Land Use Status, Market
Analysis and Development Constraints. The report will be presented to the Advisory
Committee/Subcommittee and a work shop will be held to share the information with the
public. This review will include review of the current planning goals and policies for
the area.
Land Use Alternatives (October 2000 - January 2003)
During this phase of the u,ork- based on the background informatiog the Advisory
committee will work with staff to identify the appropriate land usegl,ocation, and balance
among them for the area. This phase of the work will rely heavily on input from the
haffic analyzer as well as the market analysis. Critical to this analysis will be decisions
regarding the intersection level of service goals and mix of Iand uses.
This phase of the work will include a public workshop to discuss parameters for land use
and the implications of various choices on the planning goals and policies for the area. It
is anticipated that the public workshop will set the stage and the advisory committee,s
work will refine the choices to a single map.
Design Objecttves and Themes (February 2003 -April 2003)
Currently there are design guidelines for the Bayfront/Anza areawhich focus on the
parcels with bay frontage and on the Anza portion of the planning area but are not as
effective in the Bayfront area between Bayshore Highway and US l0l. The design
objectives for the area need tc be reviewed, particularly in light of the land use mix
chosen for the planning area. Design guidelines will need to address proposed interfaces
of the chosen land uses as well as melding existing development with future infill and
new development on larger parcels and bay access objectives. The area may need to have
different standards for the different geographic areas within the study area. The planning
goals and policies will need to be reviewed to insure that they integrate the design
objectives for the study area.
A design consultant will be hired to organize a public workshop and work urith the
advisory committee to develop appropriate design gurde lines. Staff will assist the
advisory committee and designer in developing a process and ordinance for
implementing the design guidelines.
This segment of the work program will include a public workshop to identify design
objectives. The advisory committee will work with the designer and staffto refine the
4
Prospectus for the Update of the Bayfront/Anza SpeciJic Area PIan fu$ 12,2002
guidelines so that they are consistent with the planning policies for the area. The product
will be a design chapter in the specific area plan and a proposal for implementation
process.
Balfront/Anza Area Specific Area Plan and Environmental Document (May 2003)
Staff will combine the chapters developed at each step of the process into a single, draft
specific area plan. The environmental document will be integrated into the document in
much the same way it is in the present SAP report. The environmental document will be
a program EIR. This means that the environmental document will cover the planned
changes in a general sense; but each future project developed in the planning area will
require its own environmental evaluation.
In addition as a part of the planning program the Bayfront/Arua area traffrc analyzer will
be updated. The traffic anLalyzer is used to evaluate the impacts of all new or intensified
development in the area. It is used early in the project review prco.Es and often red flags
significant unavoidable effects for developers before projects are tosfar into design.
There is no public workshop as a part of this step of plan preparation, since after the
draft document is reviewed by the Advisory Committee, it will go to the Planning
Commission and City Council for public hearing and adoption. It is anticipated that the
Advisory committee will participate in the presentation of the draft plan to both the
Planning Commission and City Council. The hearing process on the draft plan is
anticipated to take about three months. Adoption of modifications to the zoning to
implement changes to the land use and design standards may take another two to three
months.
Ju,ly 2002
U:\BayfrontAnzaSAPAmendment\WorkProgram\BayfrontAnzaProspectusT.l l.02.doc
5
.. i, :
July 8,2002
BAYFRONT/ANZA SPECIF'IC AREA PLAi\ UPDATE
Mile Stone PIan
A. Background studies (July 20|2-September 2002)
Product: Background Data Report: land use stafus, economic evaluation,
development constraints.
Advisory Committee Meeting: Review findings and conclusions, development
goals and policies
Policy Workshop: Background and PIan Objectives Workbgok
B. Land Use Alternatives (October 2002 - January 2003)
Product: Stutly of Land Use Options Based on Traffic Analyzer with Identified
Area Constraints
Land Use Workshop: Alternatives discussion, refinement; Goals and Policies
Implications
Advisory Committee Meeting(s): Review and Discuss to Develop Parameters and
Narrow Land Use Options
C. Design Objecttves and Themes (February 2003- April 2003)
Design Workshop: Discuss Design Parameters and Objectives
Advisory Committee Meeting(s): Refine Design Guidelines and Standards;
Review draft design chapter.
D. Bayfront/Anza Spectfic Area Plan and Environmental Document (May 2003)
Product: Draft document
Advisory Committee Meeting(s): Review draft Goals, Policies, objectives and
document text
I
BAYFRONT/ANZA SPECIFIC AREA PLAN UPDATE: MiIe Stone Plan fufu 8,2003
E. Adoption Process Amend General Plan (May 2002- August 2003)
Advisory Committee: Make presentation to Commission
F. Amend Zoning Codefor Implementation (August 2003- October 2003)
Advisory Committee: Work with staff to draft implementing ordinance changes.
/
July 8, 2002
BAYFRONT/AIIZA SPECIFIC ARE,A PLAIY UPDATE
Tentative Meeting Schedule
A. Background studies
Advisory Committee: July 15,2002
September 19
Workshop: September,24
B. Land Use Altematives
Workshop:November 19
Advisory Committee: December 17
January 14,2003
C. Design Objectives and Themes
Workshop: February 20
Advisory Committee: March 18
April 8
D. BayfrontlAnza Specific AreaPlan and Environmental f)oc;ul'.neat
Advisory Committee: May 6
May 20
Commission Study: June 9
U:\BayfrontAnzaSAPAmendment\WorkProgram\TentativeMeetgSchedule7.8.02.doc
2002 2003
,l
'll I
of lmpfementing Zoning Changes
Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan Update
Timeline
2002 2003
1t l'
l-egend
l( 'Workshop
;, Planning Commission Meeting
O CitV Gouncil Meeting
! Subcommittee Meeting
0 eaui"ory Gommittee Meeting
o CEQA Statute of Limitation Ends
t
15 19 19 l8 8
:.t'.
620
h
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM # 8a
MTG. 8_5_02
DATE
ro: HON9RABLE MAYOR AI\ID CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Jlly22,2002
APPROVED
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Maneger
6s0-ss8-7222
SUB.IECT: Resolution Amending Agreement with County of San for Animal Control Services
BY
BY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution
BACKGROUND: The city contracts with the County of San Mateo to provide animal controls services. The
county, in tunu contracts with the Peninsula Humane Society to provide shelter and field services. During the
past two years, the cities and the county, along with Peninsula Humane Society stafi, have been conducting a
cost and service level study ofthe anirnal control component of PHS operations. The cost study was
completed, and the county has implemented a cost sharing mechanism based on services used by each city.
This agreement adopts the new cost sharing mechanisrn
As a result ofthis change, Btrlingame's costs decreased form $143,849 in 2001-02 to $103,206 :rr-ZO02-03.
A number of cities still have concerns about the cost sharing mechanism and the integrity of the data used to
arrive at the sharing percentages. In addition, service levels are a matter ofcontinued study. The Police
Department, as the primary user ofanimal control services, will be participating in the continued work on this
contract during the coming year.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and Agreement
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2OOO.2OO3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF BURLINGAME AI\D THE COTINTY OF SAII MATEO FOR
AIIIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, on June 5,2002, by Resolution No. 6l-2000,the City Council approved a
three-year agreement between the City and San Mateo County to have the County provide animal
control services through the Peninsula Humane Society; and
WHEREAS, the County, cities in the County, and the Humane Society have evaluated
the service levels and costs involved in providing these services; and
WIIEREAS, that process has led to a restructuring of the cost-sharing provisions of the
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the restructured agreement is fair and equitable to the citizens of
Burlingame, but the agencies involved will continue to seek ways to ensure that costs of animal
control services are fairly apportioned,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOL\rED AtlD ORDERED:
1. The Mayor is authorized and requested to execute the First Amendment to the
Agreement between the City and the County for Animal Control Services as contained in Exhibit
A hereto.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Mayor.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO , City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was inffoduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COTINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS :
CITY CLERK
65377
First Amendment to Agreement for Animal Control Services
Between the City of Burlingame and the County of San Mateo
THIS AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENI, dated for convenience July 1, 2002,by and between the COUNTy OF
SAN MATEO, hereinafter called "COUNT\I' and the CITY OF BURLINGAME, hereinafter called ,.CITy.,,
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Agree,ment on July l, 2000, whereby the CITy has contacted with thecouNTY for the performance of animal control services, hereinafter.,Agreement;,'-and
WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the Agreement to change lhe amount and method of palment to theCOUNTY.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, TIIE AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
l. Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 5, Pavments. of Section @) of the original Agreement City,s Responsibilities ishereby amended as follows:
CITYshall pay to the_C_oUNW prior to January ls of each fiscal year, and following the receipt of an invoicefrom CouNTY,
Jr-r9
C|TY's percentage slge of the net program cost of the Animal dontrol nogram. This netprogram cost shall be determined by the COIJNTY and shall be equal to the cost of the contract between theCOUNTY and COUNTY coNTRACToRplus the cost of the CoUNTY administering licensing collection andAnimal Contol Services Program, minus any program revenue received by COUNTy or COUNTy
CONTRACTOR as described in Section D, Paragraph 5. CITY's percentage share of net program costs for theFiscal Year 2002-03 shall be as described by Exhibit D, attached and incorforated by this reference.
2. All other terms and conditions of the agreement dated July 1, 2000 between the coUNTy and cITy shall remainfull force and effect unless specifically amended herein.
3. The new costs shall become effective as of July 1,2002.
IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have affixed their hands.
A
ATTEST:
the Board
-lrt\^
OF MATEO
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Clerk of the Board
EXHIBIT D
FY 2OO2.O3 PERCENTAGE OF COST DISTRIBUTION
DERIVED FROM THE ACTIVIry BASED COSTING
IVIETHOD OF DISTRIBUTING SERVICE COSTS
clry
Total
1 .140/o
3.03%
0.42%
2.59o/o
1.10o/o
9.35%
8.42%
2.13%
1 .550/o
1 .33o/o
5.29o/o
2.01o/o
5.50%
0.83%
11.66%
5.81%
3.25o/o
17.531o
9.13o/o
0.93olo
7.01o/o
PERCENT SHARE
Atherton
Belmont
Brisbane
Burlingame
Colma
Daly City
East Palo Alto
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Hillsborough
Menlo Park
Millbrae
Pacifica
Portola Valley
Redwood City
San Bruno
San Carlos
San Mateo
S. San Francisco
Woodside
County
100.00%
65377
First Amendment to Agreement for Animal control seruices
Between the city of Burlingame and the county of san Mateo
TIIIS AMENDMENT To AN AGREEMENT, dated for convenience July t,2lo2,by and between the CoUNTy OFsAN MATEO' hereinafter called "COUNTY'and the CITY OF BURLINbAME, hereinafter called..CITy.,,
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the parties entered into an-Agreement on July-I,2000, whereby the cITy has contacted with theCOUNTY for the performance of animal contol s"iri""s, hereinaftir;Agreem"oq,''rod- ---
WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the Agreement to change the amount and method of palment to theCOUNTY.
NOW, THEREFORE, TTIE AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
l' subparagraph (a) of Paragraph 5, Pavments. of section @) of the original Agreement citv,s Responsibilities ishereby arnended as follows:
GITY shall pay to the collNry prior to January I't of each fiscal year, and following the receipt of an invoicefrom coUNTY, the cITY's percentage *3-1{9""etprogram cost of the Animalbontrol program. This netprogram cost shallbe deteryio"d by the coUNTY ana snalue equal to the cost of the contract between thecouNry and coUNTY coNTRACToR plus the cost of the couNTY administering licensing collection andAnimal contol Services hogram, minus any program revenue received by couNTy or coLJNTycoNTRACToR as described in section o, iaragrapn 5. cITY's percentage share of net program costs for theFiscal Year 2002-03 shall be as described uy rxtriuit D, attached "ia ir""ri"."i.a1v this reference.
2' All other terms and conditions of the aqreementdated July 1, 2000 between the couNTy and cITy shall remainfirll force and effect lnless specifically amended herein.
3. The new costs shall become effective as of July l,2O0Z.
IN MTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have affixed their hands.
J,
OF MATEO
CIry OF BURLINGAME
A
ATTEST:
the Board^rArt\^
Clerk of the Board
CITY
Total
EXHIBIT D
FY 2OO2-03 PERCENTAGE OF COST DISTRIBUTION
DERIVED FROM THE ACTIVITY BASED COSTING
METHOD OF DISTRIBUTING SERVIGE COSTS
PERCENT SHARE
Atherton
Belmont
Brisbane
Burlingame
Colma
Daly Gity
East Palo Alto
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Hillsborough
Menlo Park
Millbrae
Pacifica
Portola Valley
Redwood City
San Bilno
San Carlos
San Mateo
S. San Francisco
Woodside
County
1j4%
3.037o
0.42o/o
2.59o/o
1.10o/o
9.35%
8.42o/o
2.13%
1.55o/o
1.33%
5.29o/o
2.01o/o
5.50%
0.83%
11.660/o
5.81o/o
3.25o/o
17.53o/o
9.13o/o
0.93%
7.01o/o
100.00%
STAFF REPORT
ro: IIONORABLE MAY,OR AI\ID CITY COUNCIL
DArE: Jtuty22,2002
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager
BY
APPROYED
BY
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
from Proceeds
8b
8-5-02
650-558-7222
sL,BJEcr: Resolution Authorizing Reimbursement of Certain
Of Indebtedness (Water and Sewer Pmjects)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution
BACKGROUI\ID: In October, the city plans to issue debt for construction of various water and sewer
improvements to be performed in the stunnrcr of 2003. The city is beginning to incur costs for the design
phase of these projects. The attached resolution will allow ttre city to be reimbursed for these costs with
proceeds form the issuance ofthe bonds.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF OTTICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BURIINGAME TO REIMBURSE
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF INDEBTEDNESS
(WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM PROJECTS)
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WIIEREAS, the Cityof Burlingame intends to construct certain improvements to its water
system and sewer systems as described in Exhibit A hereto (collectively the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the City expects to pay certain expenditures ("Reimbursement Expenditures")
in connection with the Project prior to the issuance of indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs
associated with the Project on a long-term basis; and
WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects that debt obligations in an amount not expected
to exceed $20,000,000 will be issued and that certain of the proceeds of such debt obligations will
be used to reimburse the Reimbursement Expenditures; and
WIIEREAS, Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations requires the City to declare its
reasonable official intent to reimburse prior expenditures for the Project with proceeds of a
subsequent borrowing,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Burlingame
does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The City finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. This Resolution is made for purposes of establishing compliance with the
requirements of Section | .150-2 ofthe Treasury Regulations. This Resolution does not bind the City
to make any expendifure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the project.
1
3. The City hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness to
reimburse itself for Reimbursement Expenditures.
4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of _,
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
C :\FILES\RESO\indbtint2. fi n.wpd
COLTNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
2
EXHIBIT A
WATER SYSTEM PROJECT
The water system project consists of City-wide water system improvements including replacement
of water distribution/transmission mains, valves, pumpstation improvements, storage tanks and
reservoirs, SCADA improvements, water quality studies, chloramination conversion plan and related
improvements.
SEWER SYSTEM PROJECT
The sanitary sewer system project consists of City-wide sewer system improvements including
replacement/rehabilitation of sewer pipelines, manholes, cleanouti and laterals. The program als6
includes pumpstation improvements and SCADA improvements.
A-1
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
July 26,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
8c#ITEM
MTG.
DATE
8t5to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVE
BY
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY BUILDINGS JANTT CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a centralizedjanitorial agreement with universal Building services in the amount of g95,400.
BACKGROUND: The Facilities Division desires to consolidate ttle various janitorial City building cleaning
services into one coxtract. By awarding one company the contract to clean all Lity buildings lexcept ttre police
station), the City will save money and still be able to increase the level of service. The Facilities Division currently
expends approximately $135,000 annually for janitorial services.
DISCUSSION: There were several steps involved in the selection process. An advertisement was placed in the SanMateo Times inviting janitorial companies to respond to the attach;d questionnafue, and ten compinies responded.A committee was formed to rank the companies based on experience and ability to provide ttre City of Burlingame
with the required level of service. The committee selected three companies as Rnatiits and asked th.* to complete
a bid proposal and attend an interview. The committee then reviewed the bid proposals, evaluated the interviews and
completed site visits of buildings serviced by each cleaning company to asiesJ their ability to deliver the level of
service promised.
The committee recommends that Universal Building Services be awarded the janitorial contract to clean City
buildings based on their experience, references and price. The committee's main-objective was to select a service
provider that could increase the level of service while lowering the combined costs of several city janitorial contracts.
The janitorial contract is $95,400 and includes cleaning the following City buildings: City Hali,hecreation Center,
Aquatic Center, Village Park, the new Public Works Corporation Yard, Fire DeparunLnt Station 36, elevator at
Donnelly Garage, as well as annual cleaning of the Burlingame Main Library. The scope of work consists of such
activities as vacuuming, dusting, carpet shampooing, trash removal, floor mopping, window cleaning, etc.
The contract duration is for one year with an option to renew for an additional year. Staff will evaluate the
performance of Universal Building Services as a basis for exercising the option.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Contract; Proposal; Qualifications Questionnafue
BUDGET IMPACT: Funds are available in the existing Facilities Division operating budget.
650-558-7230
City Clerk, Facilities Supervisor, Management Analyst
Universal Building Services
c
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff ReportsVanitorial4City.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR JAITITORIAL SERVICES TO UNIYERSAL BUILDING SERVICES
AND APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken an extensive advertisement and evaluation process to
provide janitorial services to City buildings; and
WHEREAS, the process resulted in 3 finalists, which were then interviewed; and
WHEREAS, based on experience, responsiveness to the request for proposals and
interview, and pricing structure, Universal Building Services appears to be best-iuited to the needs
of the City for these services; and
WHEREAS, the assumption of services will be phased in over the next thirty to ninety days
to assume the services now being provided by other vendors,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The City Manager is authori zed and directed to execute the Agreement with Universal
Building Services as generally contained in Attachment A hereto, and is further authorized to
execute such amendments as may be necessary to accomplish the transition in janitorial services
during the coming six (6) months.
2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that theforesoinsresorutionwasrintoduceil;"?Hil::*rJir;:'ffiff
i:;jlonthe-davof
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
AGREEMENT
FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
CITY OF BURLINGAME
COUNCIL AWARD
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State
of Califomia, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called
"city", and herinafter called "contractor", as of the 6 day of August ,2002_.
RECITALS:
(a) City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize contracting of custodial services and
execution of this contract.
(b) A notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described.
(c) After notice duly given, on the date hereof, the City awarded the contract for custodial services
hereinaft er described to Contractor.
IT IS AGREED, as follows:
1. Scope of Work. Contractor shall perform the work according to the Contract Book therefor
entitled:
_see227 for details of schedule of work to be performed:
Restrooms/
Showers
Locker Rooms
Lunch Rooms
Common Areas
Office Areas
Meeting Rooms
Janitorial Closets
2. Contract Price. City shall pay, the Contractor shall accept, in full payment for the work above
agreed to be done the sum of not to exceed Ninety-Five Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($95,400)
Said price is determined by the prices contained in Contractor's bid, and shall be paid as
described in the Contract Book. In the event work is performed or materials furnished in addition to or a
reduction of those set fonh in Contractor's bid and the specifications herein, such work and materials
will be paid for as described in the Contract Book.
42
3. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: This
Agreement; the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals; the Accepted Proposal; the Contract Book which
includes the Special Provisions , and the Fidelity Bond.
All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the contract
documents.
All of the above-named documents are intended to cooperate, so that any work called for in one,
and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said
documents. The documents comprising the complete contract will hereinafter be referred to as "the
contract documents". ln the event of any variation or discrepancy between any portion of this agreement
and any portion of the other contract documents, this agreement shall prevail. The precedence of the
remaining contract documents will be as specified in the Contract Book.
4. Schedule. All work shall be performed in accordance with the schedule provided pursuant to the
Contract Book. Service will commence on a mutually agreed upon date within thirty (30) days of date
of contract.
5. Performance by Sureties. In the event of any termination as hereinbefore provided, City shall
immediately give written notice thereof to Contractor and Contractor's sureties, and the sureties shall
have the right to take over and perform the agreement, provided, however, that if the sureties, within 5
days after giving them said notice of termination, do not give City written notice of their intention to
take over the performance thereof within 5 days after notice to City of such election, City may take over
the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method it may deem
advisable, for the account, and at the expense of Contractor, and the sureties shall be liabie to City for
any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, City may, without liability for
so doing, take possession of, and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and
other property belonging to Contractor as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefor.
6. Insuranse. The Contractor shall provide and maintain:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance, occrurence form, with a limit of not less than
$1,000,000 each occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply
separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit.
B. Automobile Liability Insurance, occurrence form, with a Iimit of not less than $1,000,000 each
occulrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles.
C. Workers Compensation in at least the minimum statutory limits.
D. General Provisions for all insurance. All insurance shall:
l. Include the City of Burlingame, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and
volunteers as additional insureds with respect to this Agreement and the performance of services in this
Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to the
above-desi gnated insureds.
2. Be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs of City, its
officers, employees, and volunteers.
3. Be evidenced, prior to commencement of services, by properly executed policy
endorsements in addition to a certificate of insurance.
4. No changes in insurance may be made without the written approval of the City
Attomey's office.
43
7. Hold Harmless and Indemnitv Provision. Contractor agrees (l) to hold harmless and indemnify
City of San Mateo and its officers and employees from and against any and all claims, loss, liability,
damage, and expense arising from perfofinance of this contract, including claims, loss, liability, damage,
and expense caused or claimed to be caused by passive negligence of City of Burlingame, its officers or
employees, and(2) to defend City of Burlingame, its officers or employees thereagainst;provided,
however that this provision does not apply to claims, loss, liability, damage or expense arising from (a)
the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City of Burlingame or (b) the active negligence of City of
Burlingame; further provided, that this provision shall not affect the validity of any insurance contract,
workers compensation or agreement issued by an admitted insurer as defined by the lnsurance Code.
8. Attorney Fees. Attomey fees in amount not exceeding $85 per hour per attorney, and in total
amount not exceeding $5,000 shall be recoverable as costs (that is, by the filing of a cost bill) by
prevailing party in any action or actions to enforce the provisions of this contract. The above $5,OOO
limit is the total of attomey fees recoverable whether in the trial court, appellate court, or otherwise, and
regardless of the number of attorneys, trials, appeals or actions. It is the intent that neither party to ihis
contract shall have to pay the other more than $5,000 for attomey fees arising out of an action, tr
actions, to enforce the provisions of this contract. The parties expect and hope there will be no litigation
and that any differences will be resolved amicably.
9. Mediation. Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, any party may request that it be
submitted to mediation. The parties shall meet in mediation within 30 days of u r.qr"rt. The mediator
shall be agreed to by the mediating parties; in the absence of an agreement, the parties shall each submit
one name from mediators listed by either the American Aftitration Association, the California State
Board of Mediation and Conciliation, or other agreed-upon service. The mediator shall be selected by a
"blindfolded" process.
The cost of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. Neither party shall be deemed the
prevailing party. No party shall be permitted to file a legal action withoutfirsl meeting in mediation and
making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated settlement. The mediation process, once commenced
by a meeting with the mediator, shall Iast until agreement is reached by the panies but not more than 60
days, unless the maximum time is extended by the parties.
10. Arbitration. After mediation above, and upon agreement of the parties, any dispute arising out
of or relating to this agreement may be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Conitruction
Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the
arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The costs of arbitration shall be
borne equally by the parties.
I l. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions must conform to specifications.
12. Notices. All notices shall be in writing, and delivered in person or transmitted by certified
mail, postage prepaid.
t kti\4csal hxfdirg Sevin
AtuAmieTcrg
3l20PiqEStEd
Rrdnmd,CA
(st0) s27-1078
44
Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
Director of Public Works
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as appears in the signature block below
14. Interpretation. As used herein any gender includes each other gender, the singular includes theplwal and vice versa.
15. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall
operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiverof a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent
breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
16. Goveming Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and
construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement
shall be in the Superior or Municipal Court of the County of San Mateo oiSanta Clara.
17. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement
is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor.
18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the
Agreement between the City and Contractor. No terms, conditions, understandings or
agreements purporting to modi$ or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and
signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party.
l9-Paymen!-Term$. Contractor will invoice the City on a monthly basis for the services
performed pursuant to the Contract Documents. City shall pay the amount due within thirty (30)
days of the date of the invoice.
45
r'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been duly executed by the parties hereinabove
named, as of the day and year first above written.
Director of Public Works Contractor
Eou*-r, J. He<n^t ucc I
Print Name
Recommended by:
Public Works Superintendent
City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Title
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
a
46
4,,*t12(oh
SignatureQ
AGREEMENT
FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
CITY OF BURLINGAME
COIJNCIL AWARD
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State
of California, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called
"city", and herinafter called "contractor", as of the 6 day of August ,2002- .
RECITALS:
(a) City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize contracting of custodial services and
execution of this contract.
(b) A notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described.
(c) After notice duly given, on the date hereof, the City awarded the contract for custodial services
hereinafter described to Contractor.
IT IS AGREED, as follows:
l. Scope of Work. Contractor shall perform the work according to the Contract Book therefor
entitled:
see2.27 for details of schedule of work to be performed:
Restrooms/
Showers
Locker Rooms
Lunch Rooms
Common Areas
Office Areas
Meeting Rooms
Janitorial Closets
2. Contract Price. City shall pay, the Contractor shall accept, in full payment for the work above
agreed to be done the sum of not to exceed Ninety-Five Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($95,400)
Said price is determined by the prices contained in Contractor's bid, and shall be paid as
described in the Contract Book. In the event work is performed or materials furnished in addition to or a
reduction of those set forth in Contractor's bid and the specifications herein, such work and materials
will be paid for as described in the Contract Book.
42
3. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: This
Agreement; the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals; the Accepted Proposal; the Contract Book which
includes the Special Provisions , and the Fidelity Bond.
All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the contract
documents.
All of the above-named documents are intended to cooperate, so that any work called for in one,
and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said
documents. The documents comprising the complete contract will hereinafter be referred to as "the
contract documents". In the event of any variation or discrepancy between any portion of this agreement
and any portion of the other contract documents, this agreement shall prevail. The precedence olthe
remaining contract documents will be as specified in the Contract Book.
4. Schedule' All work shall be performed in accordance with the schedule provided pursuant to the
Contract Book. Service will commence on a mutually agreed upon date withinihirty (30) days of date
of contract.
5. Performance by Sureties. In the event of any termination as hereinbefore provided, City shall
immediately give written notice thereof to Contractor and Contractor's sureties, and the sureties shall
have the right to take over and perform the agreement, provided, however, thatif the sureties, within 5
days after giving them said notice of termination, do not give City written notice of their intention to
take over the performance thereof within 5 days after notice to City of such election, City may take over
the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method it -uy deem
advisable, for the account, and at the expense of Contractor, and the iureties shall be liabie to Cify for
any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, City may, without liability for
so doing, take possession of, and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and
other property belonging to Contractor as may be on the site of the work and n"r.riury therefor.
6. Insurance. The Contractor shall provide and maintain:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance, occurrence form, with a limit of not less than
$1,000,000 each occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregatelimit, it shall apply
separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit.
B. Automobile Liability Insurance, occurrence form, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each
occulrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles.c. workers compensation in at least the minimum statutory limits.
D. General Provisions for all insurance. All insurance shall:l. Include the City of Burlingame, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and
volunteers as additional insureds with respect to this Agreement and the performance olsirvices in this
Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to the
above-designated insureds.
2. Be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs of City, its
officers, employees, and volunteers.
3. Be evidenced, prior to commencement of services, by properly executed policy
endorsements in addition to a certificate of insurance.
4. No changes in insurance may be made without the written approval of the City
Attomey's office.
43
7. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Provision. Contractor agrees (l) to hold harmless and indemnify
City of San Mateo and its officers and employees from and against any and all claims, Ioss, liability,
damage, and expense arising from performance of this contract, including claims, loss, liability, damage,
and expense caused or claimed to be caused by passive negligence of City of Burlingame, its officers or
employees, and (2) to defend City of Burlingame, its officers or employees thereagainst; provided,
however that this provision does not apply to claims, Ioss, liability, damage or expense arising from (a)
the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City of Burlingame or (b) the active negligence of City of
Burlingame; further provided, that this provision shall not affect the validity of any insurance contract,
workers compensation or agreement issued by an admitted insurer as defined by the Insurance Code.
8. Afforney Fees. Attorney fees in amount not exceeding $85 per hour per attorney, and in total
amount not exceeding $5,000 shall be recoverable as costs (that is, by the filing of a cosi bill) by
prevailing party in any action or actions to enforce the provisions of this contrict. The above $!,OOOlimit is the total of attomey fees recoverable whether in the trial court, appellate court, or otherwise, and
regardless of the number of attomeys, trials, appeals or actions. It is the intent that neither party to this
contract shall have to pay the other more than $5,000 for attorney fees arising out of an action, tr
actions, to enforce the provisions of this contract. The parties expect and hope there will be no litigation
and that any differences will be resolved amicably.
9. Mediation. Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, any party may request that it be
submitted to mediation. The parties shall meet in mediation within 30 days of u..qr..t. The mediator
shall be agreed to by the mediating parties; in the absence of an agreement, the parties shall each submit
one name from mediators listed by either the American Arbitation Association, the California State
Board of Mediation and Conciliation, or other agreed-upon service. The mediaior shall be selected by a
"blindfolded" process.
The cost of mediation shall be bome equally by the parties. Neither party shall be deemed theprevailing party. No party shall be permitted to file a legal action withouifirsi meeting in mediation and
making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated settlement. The mediation process, once commenced
by a meeting with the mediator, shall Iast until agreement is reached by the parties but not more than 60
days, unless the maximum time is extended by the parties.
10. Arbitration. After mediation above, and upon agreement of the parties, any dispute arising out
of or relating to this agreement may be settled by arbitration in accordanci with the ConsJruction
Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the
arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The iosts of arbitration shall bL
borne equally by the parties.
I l. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions must conform to specifications.
12. Notices. All notices shall be in writing, and delivered in person or transmitted by certified
mail, postage prepaid.
tkriwsalhxfdirgSsris
AtuAnrieTcrg
3120PireStEd
Rifrrmd,C,{
(sl0) s27-1078
44
Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
Director of Public Works
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as appears in the signature block below.
14. Interpretation. As used herein any gender includes each other gender, the singular includes theplural and vice versa.
15. Waiver' No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall
operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiverof a breach or default under this Agreement constituto a continuing waiver of a subsequent
breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
16. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and
construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regardin! this Agreement
shall be in the Superior or Municipal Court of the County of San Mateo or Santa Clara.
17. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement
is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and tLe Contractor.
18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of theAgreement between the City and Contractor. No terms, conditions, understandings or
agreements purporting to modiff or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writin! and
signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party.
lg-IaEent Terms. Contractor will invoice the City on a monthly basis for the services
performed pursuant to the Contract Documents. City shall pay the amount due within thirty (30)
days of the date of the invoice.
45
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been duly executed by the parties hereinabove
named, as of the day and year first above written.
Director of Public Works Contractor
Yru*-rt J. H 6r?-.T7rlUCS I
Print Name
Recommended by:
Public Works Superintendent
City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Title
Approved as to form:
City Attomey
46
A
JANITORIAL SBRVICES
PROPOSAL
FOR
PRESENTED BY
U
BlJnqll!$FrvlE
tt
UNIVERSAL BUILOING SERVICES
I
I
I
TF O
UBS
UNIVEBSAL BUILDING SERVICES
JANITORIAL DIVISION
.i
SUPPLY DIVISION
. :::
P0\ ,ER S\I'/EEPING
Drvtst0N
11 July 2002
Mr. Gordon Gottsche
Management Analyst
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Gottsche:
Thaxk you for providing Universal Building Services the opportunity to submit
a janitorial proposal for the City of Burlingame at the locations specified in this
proposal. I am pleased to offer this presentation for your examination.
This letter will also serve to acknowledge our receipt of Addendum No. 1,
dated June 28, 2002. A signed copy is included with this proposal.
Universal Building Services has been a provider of superior, cost effective
cleaning services to quality facilities such as yours for over 39 years. we
attribute our success and growth to several reasons. They include:
Trained personnel utilizing the latest cleaning techniques and
equipment. UBS cleaning personnel are in daily and constant
communication with their immediate supervisors. our clients benefit by
receiving prompt, cost-effective service.Main 0ffice
3120 Pierce Street
Richmond r CA 94804
5't0 I527-1fi8
Fax 510 / 526-7289
Walnut Creek
925 / 934-5s33
San Jose
408 / 395-5111
Sacramenlo
916 / 638-1078
Petaluma
707 t781-6964
a
a
Exceptional supervision, which ensures strong quality control and
superior service to our clients. Many of our supervisors have been with
UBS for over 25 years and have worked their way up the ranks.
Experienced and responsive UBS management, which ensures that our
clients' cleaning concerns are minimized, thereby affording our clients
more time for other matters. our clients can contact UBS ilumagement
personnel 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to handle emergencies and
unforeseen events.
a
a
computerized tracking of safety and quality control inspections, which
provides data regarding history, frequency, corrective action and
follow-up of situations.
Information regarding state-of-the-art techniques and equipment
disseminated from the UBS Supply Division to the uBS Janitorial
Division, thereby ensuring that our cleaning staff uses the latest
technologies. our clients benefit by having their facilities cleaned in an
efficient and cost-effective manner.
The aforementioned are some of many reasons why universal Building
Services has become a leader in providing janitorial services to an ever-
growing number of satisfied clients. UBS now cleans over 30 million square
feet of property ranging in diversity from office buildings to refineries to high
tech research facilities. over the years, UBS has steadily grown to include 6
district offices located throughout Catifornia to better serve our clients. At
UBS, we take pride in providing for our clients superior cleaning services, cost
effectiveness and prompt response to their needs.
Should you have any questions about our proposal or about Universal Building
services, please feel free to contact me at (510) 527-107g or email to
dario@ubsco.com. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Manager
I
1.2 PROPOSAL FORM
TO THE HONORABLE CITY COT]NCIL
CITY OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
DEAR MAYOR AND COUNCIL:
The undersigned hereby proposes and agrees that, if this proposal is accepted, the Contractor will
contract with the Cify of Burlingame, Califomia, for any or all of the facililies listed below for the
prices quoted. Contractor to fumish all labor, materials, tools, and equipment. Contractor to fumish
all incidental work and services required to complete all items of work described in the
specifications. All work shall be done in accordance with the General Provisions and Special
Provisions of this Contract Book "Custodial Service for City of Burlingame".
Basic Scheduled Service Monthly Yearly
1.3-l Aquatic Center LumpSum$ 673.00 LumpSum$ 8,076.00
1.3-2 CityHall LumpSum$ 1,855.00 Lump Sum $22 ,2 60. 00
1.3-3 Fire Department, Station 36 LumpSum$ 300.00 LumpSumS 3,600.00
1.3-4 Recreation Center LumpSum$ 2,866.00 Lump Sum $34 , 3 92 .00
1.3-5 Village Park LumpSum$ 732.O0 LumpSum$ 8,784.00
1,3-6 Elevator at Donnelly Parking Structure LumpSum$ 100.00 LumpSumS 1,200.00
1.3-7 Public Works Coqporation yard LumpSum$ 1,096.00 LumpSum513,152.00
1,3-8 Library N/A LumpSum$ 3,936.00
ADDITIONAL/SPECIAL SERVICES
Main Library Vacation Replacement Cost per Day
City Hall Set-ups Cost per Hour
Extra Service (any facility) Cost per Hour
Additional Window Cleaning Costper:SryEx
Additional Carpet Shampooing Cost per Sq.Ft.
Additional Hard Floor Strip, Seal, Buff Cost per Sq.Ft.
$ 129.00 per B-hour day
g 17.00
g 17. 00
g 26.00 per hour
g 0. o8s
$ 0.08
r.2 PROPOSAL FORM (CONTTNUATTON SHEET)
6
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL - Aquatic Center
A. Bqsqqlel Resource,s: contractors shall list their proposed work force to
be assigned to this facility.
l. Number of Custodians:
Evening.1.ur.15 1. 00
2. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Eveningqlennsl5 1.25
B. Supervisgry Resources: conffactors shail rist their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
Title Area Supervisor TotalDailyHours 1. 00-
Title Area Supervisor Total Weekly Hours I . 00
Title District Mgr & TotalMonthlyHours::90@isoi
CONTRACTOR,S PROPOSAL _ City Hall
A. &rsonnel Resources: contractors shall list their proposed work force tobe assigned to this facility.
3. Number of Custodians:
Evening tltun.tt 1 ' o0
4. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Evening cleaners M
B. Supervisgry Resources: contractors shall list their proposed supervisorpersonnel to be assigned to this facility.
1i11. Area SupervisorTotal DailyHours o.25
Title Area Supervisor Total Weekly I{ours _3:_00
Title Distriet Mer r TotalMonthlyHours 8.00 - 10.00DistricE Supervisor
1.2 PROPOSAL FORM (CoNTTNUATTON SHEET)
7
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL - Fire Department, Station 36
A. Pgrgel:Inel Resources: contractors shall list their proposed work force to
be assigned to this facility.
5. Number of Custodians:
Evening.l.*.tt 1 ' oo
6. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Evening.lt*..t 1'25
B. supervisgry $.esources: contractors shall list their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
1i11. Area supervisor Total Daily Hours __t . oo-
Title Area Supervisor TotalWeeklyHours 1.00
Jills District Mgr & Total MonthlyHours 4.90
District Supervisor
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL - Recreation Center
A. Pg$onnel Resources: contractors shall list their proposed work force to
be assigned to this facility.
7. Number ofCustodians:
Eveningcleaners 1.00
8. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Evening slsansls 6.00
B. supervisgry Resources: contractors shall list their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
Title Area Supervisor Total Daily Hours O .25
1i1b Area Supervisor Total weeklyHours =jo
Title oistrict r"rer r TotalMonthlyHoursg:g0 - 10.00District Supervisor
1.2 PROPOSAL FORM (CoNTTNUATTON SHEET)
8
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL _ Village park
A. Persglagl Resources: contractors shall list their proposed work force to
be assigned to this facility.
9. Number of Custodians:
Eveningslsansm 1.00
10. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Evening.l.*... 2 ' oo
B. Supervisgry Resoulces: contractors shall list their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
Title Area Supervisor Total Daily Hours _----_} . 0O-
Title Area Supervisor Total Weekly Hours 1 . 50
Title District Mgr. & Total MonthlyHours_6.j0District Supervisor
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL _ ELEVATOR
c. &rsorlnel Resolrces: contractors shall list their proposed work force to
be assigned to this facility.
1 l. Number of Custodians:
Eveningslsansls 1.0
12. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Eveningslsansls 0.50
D. supervisgry Resources: contractors shall list their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
Jllls Area Supe rvisor Total DailyHours j. 00-
1i1ls Area Supervisor Total Weekly Hours O. 25
Title Disrricr Mgr &
District Superv
Total MonthlyHours 1 . 00 2. 00
isor
r.2 PROPOSAL FORM (CoNTTNUATTON SHEET)
9
CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL - p.W. Corp yard
A. Personnel Re$ources: contractors shall list their proposed work force
to be assigned to this facility.
13. Number of Custodians:
Evening tl.rrers 1 .00
14. Number of hours assigned to each custodian per day of service:
Evening slsansls 3. 0o
B. Supervisory Resources: contractors shall list their proposed supervisor
personnel to be assigned to this facility.
Jills Area SupervisorTotal Daily Hours 1 . 0O-
Title Ar e a s up e rv i s o rTotal weekly Hours *l:_o 0
Title Districr Mgr &Total MonthlyHours 5.oo
. Dis tri
Bstirnated monthly cost $e 1,096.00ct S erv].sor
Signature Date 11 July 2002
Name of Uni.versal Buildin g Services
10
If awarded the contract, the_undersigned hereby agrees to sign and file an agreement, attached as
$nnendixl, together with the necesiary bond, teriificate(s)6f insuran.., arid relatedendorsements
folEeneral and-automobile-liability insurance, and proof oiu n*fingurnl gurir.ss License in theoffice oll!. lity C-le$ within tenitol calendar days after the date oithe award and to commencework within five (5) {a.ry of the date specified in ttie notice to proceed, and to complete the work
under said contract within the specified number of working days beginning from the date specifiidin the notice to proceed. Contractor also agrees to keep ttrE gusineri Li..is" current for the entireterrn of the contract.
frt\9.l.ump sum for.each building and the total amount named by a bidder for any item do not agree,it will be assumed that the error was made in computing the lump sum for eactr building andthitotal amount will be considered as representing tG bidier's intention.
Unit prices bid must not be unbalanced.
The undersigaed has _checked carefully all the figures listed in the Schedule of Bid Items andunderstands that the. City will not be r6sponsiblifor uny
"oors
or omissions on the part of theundersigned in making up this bid.
NOTE^:. The-square footages and unit counts shown in the Special Provisions are an estimate only.
Since the exact figures are not deterrnined, the City r.s.*.. the right to adjust quantities as
deemed necessary to meet its requirements.
The undersiq.g !.^tty certifies that this bid is genuine, and not sham or collusive, or made in theinterest or in behalf of any.person not natrqq her"ein, *d tn.t tne unaeislgn.J-ii"r not directly orindirectly induced or soliiii.ed-any other bidder to put in a iham bid, or an'y other person, firm orcorporation to refrain from bidding,-and that th-e undersigned has not in any.u*.r rorgt t bycollusion to secure for himself an advantage of any kind"whatever.
The undersigr.g agrees that this bid may not be withd.rawn for a period of forty-five (a5) days afterthe date set for the opening thereof.
NOTE: IF TIIE PROPOSAL IS MADE BY AN INDryIDUAL, HIS NAME AND POST OFFICEADDRESS MUST BE SHOWN. IF THE PROPOSAL IS MADE BY A PARTNERSHIP, THE NAMEAND ADDRESS OF EACH MEMBER OF THE FIRM OR PARTI.IERSHIP MUST gB SHowN (ur_MORE THAN TWO MEMBERS OF A FIRM OR PARTNERiTTTP, PLEASE ATTACH ANADDITIONAL PAGE]; OR IF MADE BY A CORPORATION, THE PRoPoSAL SHALL sHow TI{ENAME OF THE STATE LINDER THE LAWS OF WHICH TUB CONPORATION WAS CHARTERED$P qry I{4MES, TITLES AND BUSINESS ADDRESSES OF THE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY ANDTREASURER OF SAID CORPORATION.
I.3 BIDDER'S STATEMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
1l
SIGNATIIRES FOR BIDDER:
If INDIVIDUAL, sign below:
N/A
Print name
Post Address
If PARTMRSHIP, sign below (show names of
non-signing partners):
N/A
Signature Date
Name of Partner
Post Address
Name of Partner
Post Address (if
If CORPORATION, sign below (show names of
non-signing offrcers):
Universal Building Services
a CORPORATION
a1 fo l-
07 -tt-o2
Dar io eVinc er:-zi
Print name of person signing bid
o erations Mana er
List names of thefollowing fficers
Leonard Brusseau 07- 1 I-O2
Grace Brusseau 07-1 t-02
Grace Brusseau 07 -tt-02
3L20 Pierce Street
Post Address
Rj-chmond, CA 94804
t2
Date
CITY OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
(To be submitted with Proposal Form)
1.4 CERTIFICATE OF NONDISCRMINATION
On behalf of the bidder making this proposal, the undersigned certifies that there will be nodiscrimination in employment;,vith.:gdl9l to maritai ,iuffr, sexual orientation, ancestry, medicalcondition, race, color, religion, sex, dilability, or national ;;gin; that att feaerai, state, and localdirectives and executivg oiaeJi regarding noiraiscriminution i", .-pioyrr;;6ii ue .ornfiieo *itUand that the principle of equal opp-ortuni"ty in empfoyment will be denionsfiated positivit'y ana
--'
aggressively. L J
tl, .' ti t
rilll, ill/ru,'r'
ariio DeVinc enzi-, Operat ions Managerniversal Building Services
(Bidder)
By:D
U
(Name and title of person making certificate)
Dated: It July 2oO2
13
Univercal &rilding Services
June 2002
Grace Brusseau
CEO & Secty/Treasurer
Leonard Brusseau
President
Operations Finance
Dario DeVincenzl
Operations Mgr
Frank Batara
Controller
Accounts DeptMaintenance Div Sweeping Div Supply Div
Payroll Dept
Jeny Nunez
Districl Mgr
Joe Clinging
District Mgr
Ron Martinucci
District Mgr
Paul Allen
Districl Mgr
Gary Green
Manager
BillGodfrey
Division Mgr
Lisa taaunaga
Buyer Job Gosting Dept
Rlta Vitaliano
Sales Mgr
Agustin Romo
Area Mgr
Bill Kiser
Area Mgr
Wlllhm Martinez
Asst Manager
Darlene Bryant
Cust Svc Rep Support
Gary Pratt
Account Liaison
Doug tascardo
Mechanic
Maria Cabrales
Cust Svc Rep
Sergio Alvarez
Superuisor
Ted Chamberlain
Account Liaison
Blll Lugo
Mechanic
Chuck Baldwln
Field Sales
Sotello Carrillo
Supervisor
S. Rodriguez
Supervisor
Marketing
G. Gonzalez
Supervisor
Tania Solls
Supervisor
Stove LeRoy
Field Sales
Ervin Moom
Asst Manager
Moises Mendoza
SupeMsor Amie Tong
Ma*eting MgrAntonlo Lopez
Supervisor
Jalme Huerta
Supervisor
George Tumer
lnside Sales
Jesus Millan
Supervisor
Salvador Orozco
SupeMsor Contracts
Roque Chagolla
SupeMsor
Garlos Alarcon
Supervisor
Angie Banuelos
lnside Sales
Jose Porras
Supervisor
Jose Nunez
SupeMsor
Joyce Cuevas
Admin Asst
Luis Diaz
SupervisorJose Mosqueda
SupeMsor
Agustin Peralta
Supervisor
Connie Xlartlnez
Admin Asst
I
:
=UBSUNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES
JANITORIAL DIVISION
.:
SUPPLY DIVISION
POWER S:WEEPING
DIVISION
UBS CUSTOMER PRICE LIST Date June 20,2OO2 Sales Rep.Bita VitalianoAccountameAcct No.
Bill to 1322 Marsten Road Phone No.650-558-7686
Fax No 650-696-1 598CityBurlingameStateCAzip9401 0 Contact Gordon Cottictte
STOCK #ITEM UNIT PRICE NOTES of lnteresr
1120275 Case $ 20.00 m0/ce
r.300015 #2520 Cormatic toilet tissue,2'plv Case $ 41.00 36 tll1ffihhet
1150015 Seat covers fold Case s 35.5s 5m/ce
1110050 #28400 towel,Case $ s3.77 12 rk/ ce1L20245Roll toilet Case $ s2.es 96rlelsfi) shet1160035Case$ s7.18 500/(e
1160015 #4 Case $ 37.18 ?.fi/c@2434085#91L2 hand Case $ 39.97 12-800sl / @2430021Case$ 17.0s 4 galon / @3100595Liners,40 x 48 HD Opaque Case $ 1s.60 250/ce
3100205 40 x 46 1..4 Black Case $ 2s.60 2il/c*
3L00585 Liners,x Case $ a7.84 500/ca*
3100355 30 x 36 .8 mil Case $ 11.L8 ?50/ w
3100575 24x24 Case $ 12.45 l0m/ce
31.00345 Liners, 24x24 .5 mil Case $ 7.8s 500/ ca*
Main 0tfice
3120 Pierce Street
Richmond r CA 94804
510 t s27.1U78
Fax 510 / 5m-7289
Walnut Creek
925 / 934-5533
San Jose
408 i 995-5111
Sacramento
916 / 638-1078
#'!;P''-'",
ypul agoC,ABD
HONORED
HERE i VISA
LastUpdared 06/24/2002
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARIMENI
(650) 558-7230
Uni-versal Buildin
The City of Burlingame
CIIY HAIL . 5OI PPIMROSE ROAD-
BURIINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94OI O-3997
CORPORAIION YARD
t6s0) 558-7670
June 28,2002
ADDENDUM NO 1 TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS F'OR JANITORIAL CONTRACT
BID DATE: JULy t2,ZOO2,AT 2:00 p.M.
Notice is hereby given that the following revisions are hereby made a part of the above Contract Documents
L. See At.tached f tems f through XI
This Addendum consists of this page and the (3) pages attached.
All bidders shall acknolledge-receipt and acceptance of Addendum No.l by signing in the spaceprovided at the end of this a?aenaum.and submitting ttre signed Addendum with their proposal.Failure to do so may constitute grounds for i":..ii"r""rthe bid.
Very truly yours,
C or ture 11 July 2002
DateDariDeVinc enzi-,Operations Manager
g Services
Comp any Name
e
S:\A Public Works Direcrory\FORMS\project Forms\ADDENDUM
Addendum #1
EXHIBIT A
Page 5 Number 5 Period of Gontract
Desisnation of Commencement Date When the Commencement Date has been
determined, the parties shall immediately execute an amendment to this Agreement
setting forth the Commencement Date. The contract start date will be initiated by
agreement of both parties and thereafter run for a l2-month period. The city will
have the option to extend the agreement for one single, l2-month period.
ll. Page 20 2.13 Suppties & Equipment
The contractor will furnish all necessary tools, equipment and supplies such asmops' vacuum cleaners, brooms, buffer, ladder, and hoses; and wiil supply allwaxes and cleaners, paper and sanitary supplies, hand soaps, waste can iiners
and batteries for deodoiant blocks. The Ciiy may request a change of productsto obtain a more satisfactory appearance, oior or other improverient.
The contractor shall supply to City the actual monthly cost of bathroom supplies for
each facility. Contractor and City shall meet two times annually to review such
expenditures. Should the actual cost vary significantly from contractor's estimated
monthly cost, the contract administrator shall negotiate to make equitable
adjustments in such situations.
lll. Page 21 2.15 Cost Adjustment
There will be at least a 2o/o increase with the CPI index. The cost adjustment will
not based on thejanitorial union contract.
lV. Page 23 2.24 Recyclable Materials
The contractor will be required to collect recyclable materials separated by staff. Thecontractor shall keep recyclable materials separated and consolid-ate those materials into
the appropriate containers for that facility. itre recycled materials that will be collected
and handled separately will include Mixed Paper, iardboard, Recyclable Cans and Bottles,and Other Materials as designated by the City. There shall be no ".o., contamination ofseparated recyclable materials by the contractor nor shall these recyclable materials bediscarded as trash.
Cardboard Boxes will be broken down by the contractor when left in designated areas andwill be handled and consolidated as Mixed paper.
The contractor understands that there may be changes, additions or even reductions to the
number of categories or handling of recyclable maGrials, due to the availability of newrecycling or more consolidated recycling opportunities.
t.
V
The following recycling issues will be reported to the appropriate city staff person by the
contract supervisor:
Contamination: recycling bins that are consistently contaminated with garbage or
inappropriate materials for that container.
Recyclables in Garbage: garbage cans that are consistently rich in recyclable
paper, bottles, cans or cardboard.
Disrepair: disrepair of recycling bins affecting the proper handling of recyclables.
Insufficient Capacity: recycling bins that are consistently overflowing or unable to
handle the load of materials.
Non-Participation: evidence that common recycling practices are being ignored in
specific areas or by specific employees,
Page 24 Restrooms (Clinical Level of Cleaning)
Under monthly: Machine scrub/wash floors. Include wash & disinfect walls,
partitions, frames & doors
Vl. Page 27 Definitions (Holidays)
Admission Day is removed from the Holiday Schedule
vll. Page 29 3.1 Aquatic Genter, 400 oak Grove Road
1. Remove floor mats from the Men & Women locker rooms nightly. Clean and
disinfect floor. Disinfect and hose rnats off at East Side of building using hose bib.
2. Remove floor mats from Snack Bar room nightly. Clean and disinfect floor.
Disinfect and hose mats off at East side of building using hose bib.
3. Cleaning is to be perforrned 7 days a week, Sunday through Saturday, between
the hours of 9 p.m. and 12 a.m except on the following holidays:
New Year's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day
Vlll. Page 30 3.2 City Hail
l. If the Council or Planning meeting runs over normally scheduled cleaning times,
the cleaning after meetings with are based on an hourly rate. The janitorial
contractor will provide a staff member to be present at 5 pM.
2. Doors will not automatically shut at 5 PM until the new security is implemented.
lX. Page 34 3.4 Recreation Genter, 850 Burlingame Ave
l. Clean storage closets annually.
2. Clean Teen Center restroom as specified under, section 2.2g ,.Work to be
Performed" Restrooms: Clinical level of Cleaning.3. clean Dance studio on a daily basis as specified under section 2.2g'.work to be
Performed.',
4. Office area to include the cleaning of lunch area.
X. Page 35 3.5 Viilage park, i592 Gatifornia Drive
1. Must use friendly environmentar safe chemicars. This facility is a day care
center.
2. Wipe down tables on a daily base. place chairs on table and sweep and mop
floors.
3. Clean refrigerator, oven and microwave on a monthly basis.
Village Park also takes two weeks off over the Christmas holiday and one week overspring break.
xt.Page 38 3.7 public Works Gorp yard, 1361 Garolan
AII contractors will provide a quote on this facility to only include janitorial
services (excluding windows and carpet cleaning) based solely on square footage.As stated in the contract, the Contractor and City will meet and ugr"i o, a reviJed
scope of work at the new Corporation yard to accurately reflect the nature and
extent of the work required.
INTRODUCTION
Universal Building Services was founded in 1963 by Leonard Brusseau and Joseph Pieri.
Prompt response, personal contact, efiicient service and thorough follow-up to its clients
were the tenets on which the company was based. Those principles remain today, and have
become the cornerstones of the company's policies. They, in turn, support the company's
umbrella policy of total client satisfaction. That UBS has steadily gio*n throughout its
history is testimony to the company's success in meeting its princ-iples. Now, ovir thirty-
five years later, UBS remains family owned and services well over 3b million square feet tf
diverse building space throughout the state of California. Growth and expansion at UBS
continues to be steady and controlled.
Universal Building Services began with a single office in Richmond, California. To better
accommodate the additional space required for increased staff and workers, more
equipment, garaging and servicing of power sweepers, and warehousing of maintenance
supplies, the Richmond facility has expanded to include several buildings Richmond is alsothe location of the company's corporate offices. As UBS continued- to expand, district
9ffices were gradually opened in Modesto, Petaluma, Sacramento, San Jose, and Walnut
Creek to provide better client support and service. In addition, UBS has developed
working alliances with various service providers throughout the state of California.
Universal Building Services has grown steadily to become a major presence in the field oftotal building cleaning maintenance throughout California. To the basic janitorial ofiice
cleaning, which was the original UBS service provided, have been added .u.p"t cleaning,
hard and resilient floor care, window cleaning, emergency clean up, and numerous other
ancillary services. To strengthen its position as a leaJing provider of futt-service cleaning
and maintenance, UBS added power sweeping and maintimance supply sales to the services
9trer9d by the company. Power Sweeping and Maintenance Supply-sales are now separate
divisions of Universal Building Services.
Universal Building Services remains dedicated to continuing those principles that have
contributed in its longevity, stability and growh and that have resulted in the satisfaction
and loyalty of its cfients Providing leadership into the future are UBS managers and
supervisors who, individually, average over 25 years of experience with UBS alone. With
experienced leadership, trained workers, and a growing base of satisfied clientele, Universal
Building Services is poised to meet the challeng"r of future business and growth with
confidence.
MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY
Universal Building Services is committed to providing its clients with responsive, thorough
and cost-effective services in the areas of buildings and facilities maintenance. UBS strivesto achieve complete client satisfaction by tailoring its services to each individual client's
needs. Adhering to its practice of applying creative and innovative thinking to theprofession of building maintenance, UBS il*ays attempts to incorporate the latest
materials and techniques in the seemingly simple task oi cleaning. H'owever, for new
procedures and supplies to be adopted, UBS clients must either benefit from better results,profit from greater cost effectiveness, or realize increased safety and/or security. As amatter of course, UBS management will discuss such considered ihanges directly with theclient and solicit feedback. This proactive approach results in better dialogue and
understanding between the client and UBS rnanug"*ent.
To achieve its goal of complete client satisfaction, UBS is vitally concerned with:
. Employee selection and trainingo Supervisory selection and trainingo Management selection and trainingo Employee morale and prideo Employee serf improvement and continuing educationo Employee and client safety. Employee and client securityo Emergency procedures. euality controlo Cost containmento Client satisfaction
By.remaining family owned, Universal Building Services is able to provide a level of servicewhich is more personal than that found in lar$r corporate janitorial companies. UBS doesnot have either the corporate restraints or th; administrative burden, no.rnrtty associatedwith larger companies- Accordingly, UBS managers devote less time dealing withadministrative paperwork and have more time available to implement and optimize cleaningand maintenance programs for their clients.
S R SELECTIO N AND TRAINNG
Universal Building Services has a long-standing policy of promoting from within. Those
employees who exhibit company loyalty, longevity, outstanding performance, and wish to
advance are evaluated for their practical knowledge and their leadership potential by LiBS
upper management. Because UBS supervisors oversee the actual cleaning operations of the
work crews, and since superior cleaning is paramount to our clients' satisfaction, the
selection of the proper candidate to promote to UBS Supervisor is vitally important to
UBS.
The UBS Supervisor candidate must demonstrate practical knowledge or have proven field
experience at all tasks involving building maintenance. The candidate must also have the
ability to communicate effectively and supervise a diverse range of personnel. The selection
team also examines the candidate's ability to organize designated tasks, since this is vital to
ensuring that all assignments are completed as schedulia. fnir results in UBS clients
experiencing worry-free maintenance service.
A new tlBS supervisor is assigned to a specific UBS District Manageq who furthers the
supervisor's training through on-site, hands-on experience Th; District Manager
disseminates to the new supervisor practical knowle-dge about the district's cleaning
operations. The District Manager helps to sharpen the supervisor's skills in handling
cleaning situations correctly. The new supervisoi is also trained to identify and address
potential maintenance difficulties and problems, so that day-to-day cleaning operations
progress smoothly.
trBS Supervisors maintain their expertise through numerous continuing education
programs. Quarterly in-house seminars keep the supervisors abreast of changes in the
company and its policies. LIBS supervisors attend off-site seminars given by trade and/or
educational groups. This ensures that UBS supervisors will be informed about recent
developments in cleaning materials and techniquis. In addition, The UBS Supply Division
shares information from supply representatives about new products and procldures with
the janitorial supervisors. Any necessary information is passed down from the supervisorsto their appropriate work crews. The supervisors then follow up to ensure proper
implementation of the new cleaning procedures.
Universal Building Services desires to employ self-motivated, trainable, service oriented
people at all levels of hire. Current UBS employees have proven to be an excellent source
for new employees. Current UBS employees are aware of the quality work and client
service mindedness expected by UBS of its employees and are therefore in a position to
recommend people who fit well with the UBS corporate philosophy.
Prospective employees must successfully complete Universal Building Services
employment requirements and procedures, which include:
o I UBS employment application.o Proper I-9, Immigrations and Naturalization documents.o With consent of applicant, previous employer background checks.o Criminal background checks, where applicable.o An employee orientation checklist
Should the job assignment involve driving a company vehicle or if required by the client,
applicants undergo a thorough Department of Motor Vehicles driving history review. In
addition, these employees voluntarily submit to UBS's Drug and Alcohol Screening
Program, with the understanding that they are subject to future random testing.
Eligible candidates, after preliminary screening by our personnel department, are then
interviewed by the respective project manager or supervisor, who further determines the
candidate's suitability to a particular assignment, work experience and "fit" as a UBS
employee.
Successful candidates (new hires) then undergo the UBS Employee Orientation Program,
wherein they are introduced to UBS's rules and regulations and receive site-specific
orientation by the respective project manager and/or supervisor. New hires also receive
their own copies of the Universal Building Services Employee Handbook and are instructed
about safety, security, and emergency procedures.
EMPLOYEE SELECTION
EMPLOYEE TRAINING CURRICULUM
New Emolovee Orientation
New Universal Building Service employees are assigned to a supervisor who provides
indoctrination training covering company policies, safety in the work place, emergency
procedures and proper cleaning procedures. Cleaning procedures taught include
appropriate use of chemicals, proper use of equipment, correct methodology of cleaning
and attention to personal safety habits. The new hire is watched closely and supervised
during the first 2 weeks of work. New employees are not reteased to work alone on a
station until they have demonstrated practical knowledge and ability to clean properly.
AIso, new employees are not allowed to operate equipment until they are deemed capabie
of operating them safely and competently.
In addition to verbal and hands-on instruction, each new UBS employee is given an
extensive bilingual Employee Handbook. The UBS Employee Handbook details ali aspects
of !e job and provides additional references and contacts, should the employee have
additional questions or require clarifi cation.
Current Universal Building Service employees are kept up to date in the matters of cleaning
methods and materials through a number of programs. As new products and methods are
developed, they are taught to our cleaning staffby their supervisors. Where applicable, we
will have a product representative in attendance to insure the transfer of information and to
answer specific questions as they arise.
Continuing education is maintained through the attendance of seminars, videotape
programs, cassette programs and meetings with vendor representatives.
Additionally, the UBS Janitorial Division receives the benefit of the UBS Supply Division
first learning about new products, equipment, and techniques from supply vendors. The
information is immediately passed on to the Janitorial Division. The ultimate benefit is that
the UBS client receives the most recent, state of the art maintenance in the shortest
possible time from introduction.
Universal Building Services realizes the importance of high employee morale and esprit de
corps. In a profession where tasks and assignments can become tedious, repetitious and
seemingly thankless, IJBS encourages its managers at all levels to take an interest in
employees' goals and aspirations, as well as their personal and professional lives. Managers
are reminded of the tedium of many jobs and are encouraged to give generous praise and
show gratitude to deserving employees for work well done.
In addition, Universal Building Services has several specific programs in place to provide
tangible symbols of praise and recognition to outstanding employees. These programs
include:
Letters of commendation and appreciation. UBS gives special recognition to
employees when they reach certain milestones such as anniversary dates, when they
achieve an absent free year or participate in an activity "beyond the call of duty"
such as participating in a local community drive.
a
a
a
o
Year-end salary bonus awards. Employees who have consistently shown
outstanding work results during the year are given financial incentives in the form
ofa cash bonus.
Departmental Safety Awards. Larger department sites or crews are given a
luncheon to recognize an injury free year.
Recognition Gift Certificates. Every district issues a grocery gift certificate to
employees who have achieved certain goals or met certain special deadlines given
to them by their supervisors.
EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE AND RECOGNITION PROGRAM
JANITORIAL EO AND SUPPLIES
Universal Building Services is in an advantageous position compared to most other
janitorial companies in that UBS also has a Janitorial Supplies Division. UBS is made
aware of market trends, new products and changes in paper composition and quality. LIBS
clients benefit from this in the form of cost savings, inventory control and quality
improvements.
Universal Building Services supplies its custodial staff with equipment and products that
maximize efficiency and enhance productivity. Our primary supply vendors have
representatives who work closely with our management team and keep us abreast of any
advances in our industry.
In the performance of this contract, Universal Building Services will provide the very latest
in equipment and materials. All equipment brought onto the work site will be brand new,
and where applicable, state of the art.
Universal Building Services maintains its own shop where equipment is maintained and
repaired. Equipment maintenance is performed in accordance with manufacturers'
schedules and specifications. Equipment is tracked, scheduled and serviced by Universal
Building Services' Repair Department technicians.
OUALITY CONTROL
Quality control at Universal Building Services has several components including the ability
to report on the quality of service. Daily implementation of our quality control system is
assured through steady contact between UBS project managers, UBS district managers a-nd
IIBS clients. In addition, the following programs are in place:
1. UBS maintains job site service checklists that are used by on-site and oflsite
management to assure that all required tasks, daily and periodic, are performed in
accordance with contract specifications, properly and in a timely manner. We also provide
calendar schedules of all periodic and project tasks.
2. To ensure and maintain the high standards of cleaning expected by UBS, all work
performed is inspected on a regular and periodic basis by UBS supervisors.
3. Visual inspections are constantly made along with written inspections; client
participation is always encouraged. Any required corrective action will be taken and a
follow-up inspection will be made. Copies of these inspection reports are reviewed with the
respective janitor during and upon completion. The respective distria manager will also
make weekly inspections with the appropriate follow-up. Consistency along with good
follow through is our key to a successful quality control program.
4. UBS maintains its equipment regularly in order to effectively perform its operations.
Logs of equipment inventory and maintenance are kept to assure that UBS personnel have
the best equipment for the job.
5. UBS can provide its clients with regular employee satisfaction questionnaires to elicit
feedback about our janitorial service.
6. UBS has a program in place to routinely and regularly keep its workers' awareness level
for safety keen at all times. Monthly meetings are held on selected topics, and recent
incidents, if any, are reviewed to discuss how they happened and how they may be
prevented.
UBS SAFETY PROGRAM
Safety
UBS stresses safety to all employees at all times at alljobs. Safety awareness begins when
the new UBS employee is hired. Indoctrination training covers all aspects of personal,
chemical, and equipment safety. Personal safety training includes proper methods of lifting
heavy objects, being cognizant of potentially hazardous and dangerous situations and
ensuring that high visibility barrier tape or wet floor signs are in place where necessary.
Chemical safety training includes the wearing of proper eye, hand and skin protection
necessary for the assigned task, always mixing chemicals from a higher concentration to a
lower one, and awareness of and how to use MSDS information. Equipment safety training
includes proper care and handling of vacuums, mops, floor machines, extractors and other
such machinery. Employees are instructed that regular periodic maintenance of equipment
ensures safe operation. Emergency procedures involving personal safety, property
protection, and equipment damage control are taugtrt to the new employee.
Safety training and awareness is constantly given to UBS employees in the form of monthly
safety talks, presentations from equipment and chemicals vendors representatives, and
regular job site inspections by UBS supervisors, who are keenly aware of the value of
working safely. The supervisors themselves attend quarterly management meetings,
wherein presentations about safety on the job are always grven.
Drug and Alcohol Program
LIBS is aware that a person's use of drugs and/or alcohol will not only affect productivity,
but also the safety of that employee as well as the safety of those employees and people in
close proximity. Candidates for employment at UBS are grven pre-employment drug and
alcohol testing. Candidates who fail to pass these tests are not hired by UBS. In addition,
regular UBS employees are given random testing, such that at least 50% of UBS
employees are tested in one calendar year. UBS is a proud participant in DISA and adheres
to its standards.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Universal Building Services equips its managers, supervisors and lead personnel with
cellular phones, radios and pagers. UBS management personnel are available 24 hours a
day. UBS maintains a Z4-hour answering service, by which UBS clients can reach our
management staff. Our answering service will page the on-call manager immediately. UBS
cleaning personnel are able to reach their supervisors and managers through an "800" toll
free number.
UBS has an extensive labor pool to service its client's in the event of an emergency. For
example, just in numbers, UBS has over seven hundred experienced employees in the Bay
fuea alone. We draw from this pool of workers to support clients' facilities on a short-term
basis in case of emergencies such as fire, flood or accident in a facility. This group includes
waxers, carpet cleaners and window washers, as well as janitors.
QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE
1. COMPANYINFORMANON
Company name:
lndicate size in dollar sales per year of your company:
$
ln which jurisdictions do you hold a business license?
3, fl(PERIENCESECT'O'V
ls your company presently cleaning any major facilities in the area?o YestrNo
lf Yes, list properties and their location:
Address:
Phone number:()
FAX number:
Owner/President name:
Years in janitorial
business
Professlonal affiliations:
2. COMPANY ORGANIZATION SECTION
Please provide a complete and up-to{ate organizational chart for your
organization. ln the space provided, please tell us what makes your
company different from the others and why your company deserves the
contract.
Ooes your company have any experience cleaning city govemment facilities?tr YesoNo
lf yes, list properties and dates of service.
1
\
4. REFERENCE SECTION
Please.list two (2) comparable facilities in the area which you cunenfly
maintain:
Account name:
Contact peBon:
Phone number:
I
Account name:
Contact person:
Phone number:
5. FINANCIAL SECTION
Please submit proof of financial sofuency. Examples of types of documents:o Financial statements such as Balance ShebtC and profit_Loss
Statementso Last three months bank statementso Last yea/s tax retum
o
6. rrvsuRA,vcE sEcrrorv
The City of Burlingame requires Commercial General Liability lnsurance,
occurrence fonr, with a limit of not less than g 1,OO0,OO0 each occurrence_
Could you comply with this coverage?tr YesoNo
The City of Burlingame requires Automobile lnsurance, occurence form, with
a limit of not less than g 1,000,000 each occunence. Could you comply with
this coverage?tr yes
oNo
Do you cunently carry these amounts of insurance?o YosoNo
lf yes, please indicate he
name and phone number
current insurance canier and insurance agents,
7. BONDS SECr,ON
The City of Burlingame requires a Fidelity Bond for $1OO,OO0 to cover the
contracto/s employees against loss due to dishonesty, disappearance, or
destruction. ln addition, a emptoyees wo*ing in Cid Uuibihls wi be
required to be fingeryrinted.and will be subjeci to baikground-checks by your
company. Could you comply with these requirements,o yos
oNo
Do you cunently carry this bonding level?o Yes
2
oNo
lf yes, please identify the following:
Name of bonding
compa
Contact
na
Phone number:{t
8. LABORCALCULATION SECTION
Which of the following statements best describes the method you use to
determine the amount of labor needed to do a job:
E Computer Workload Systemtr lndustry Standardso Experience Factoro Standard Rate of Accompllshmento Other (Please explain on attachment)
9. A D D IT IO N AL SERY'CES SECT'O'V
Please list on a separate sheet those services you could supply above and
beyond cleaning. Please indicate next to each service if you use your own
people or subrontract the service. (Please use attachment.)
10. QUALITY CONTROL SECTION
Who do you see as having responsibility for the quality level of the facility?o The Building Manager (Client)tr Your Area/Branch Managero Other (Please explain on attachment)
Please describe in brief form the system you will use for controlling quality.
(Please use attachment)
Do you use a uork tracking system to ensure that tasks are accomplished at
established intervals?o YssoNo
lf yes, please provide example.
Submit the results of a recent customer satisfaction survey evaluating your
services.
1 1. TNSPECTTONS SECTTOTV
Speciry the type and frequency of periodic inspections to be conducted at thejob site. Attach a copy of any report form(s) to be used.
12. CLIENr INTERFACE SECTION
What communications tools do you use to communicatre with clients that
have a desire for something to be done? please provide any written
examples.
What process do you use for handling complaints? (please use attachment)
3
What is your response time to answer a call:o Phonerpager
o To b6 on site
13. EMPLOYEE SECTION
Briefly describe your hiring practices, including qualifications to screen
employees. (Please use attachment).
Do you pay your employees prevailing wages and benefits?
El YesoNo
lf yes, could you supply records to verify this, if requested?o YesoNo
14, TRAINING SECTION
What system do you presently use to train your hourly employees in
technique?
o Classroomo Film Stripo Videoo Manual (written)o Seminarso Other (explain):
Which topics do you cover?
Safety
MSDS sheets
Proper u8e & storage of cleaning materials
Hazardou6 chemlcals labeling
Splll procedures
Dlspoeal and rcmoval of hazardous waste
Cleaning methodologles
Recycling
Engllsh language
15. EQUIPMENT SECTION
Describe the equlpment you provide to your cleaning staff. (Please use
attachment).
16. SUPPLIES SECTION
Do you use environmentally preferable products, e.g. cleaners, bathroom
supplies, etc.?o YesoNo
lf yes, please specify on an attachment.
o
o
tr
o
o
tr
o
o
o
tr
What procedures will you employ to ensure that bathroom paper and soap
supplies are maintained at all times? (Please use attachment)
17. UNIFORMS SECTION
Do you provide uniforms and identification badges for all cleaning personnel?o YesoNo
4
18. REPORTS SECTION
What reports, if any, do you provide to your customers? (Please attach an
example)
19. HEALTH & SAFETY SECTION
Please describe what your company is doing to minimize the health, safety
and environmental impacts from the products that will be utilized for this
contract. Specifically, address cleaning product selection such as toxicity,
VOC emissions, etc. Also, address employee training to ensure proper
product usage, storage and waste disposal. Mention any particular efforts
your company has undertaken in other contracts to address health and
safety for workers, building occupants and the environment.
Do we have your authorizatlon to contact references and confirm the information you
have provided?o yes
o ,vo
Person completing the questlonnaire:
Title/position:
Signature:
Date:
5
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Iuly 26,20012
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
8d
8t5to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING HATCH LANE SEWER REHABILITA oN, cP 9853(5)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding the Hatch Lane
Sewer Rehabilitation project to Kinsel Industries, Inc. of texas in the amount of $166,100.
BACKGROUND: Bids were opened on July 17,2OO2 and four bids were received ranging from g166,100 to
$208,000. The low bid is approximately 25Vi over the engineer's estimate of $133,300. rnJn{rr bid was due to thebusy location of the work and the limited construction hours.
The low bidder, Kinsel Industries, Inc., is located in Houston, Texas with their local office in Benicia, California.The staff was concerned about their familiarity with the area and requested their experience on similarfiojects. Theyindicated that their engineer has inspected ttre job site and that they had extensive experience in woik of a similarnature in the last few years. Currently they are working on a $7 million project for iong Beach Water District inSouthern California. Staff spoke to the project engineer irom the District *t o grr. a very positive reference for thecompany.
PROJEST: The project consists of relocating an existing sewer from under a stonn drain box culvert on Hatch Laneto Burlingame Avenue. Staff will work closely with the businesses to coordinate the construction and minimize theinconvenience to the public. Consffuction is expected to begin by late August and will be completed by the end ofSeptember.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement, Bid Summary, Site Map
BUDGET IMPACT:
Expenditures:
Construction
Contingency (10%)
Construction Management
Engineering Administration
TOTAL COST
$166,100
16,900
44,000
13.000
$230,000
There are sufficient funds in the CIp budget for all work.
Donald P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: city clerk, city Attorney, Finance Director, Kinsel Industries
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Repors\9g53(5)award.stf.wpd
RESOI-t NO.
AWARDING HATCH LANE SEWER REHABILITATION
TO
KINSEL INDUSTRTES. INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(5)
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITy PROJECT
9953(5) - HATCH LANE SEWER REH
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiry that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
WHEREAS, on JULY 17,2N2, all bids were received and opened before the City Clerk andrepresentatives of the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, KINSEL INDUSTRIES, INC., submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job inthe amount of $166,100.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the plans andspecifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; an-d
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of KINSEL INDUSTRIES, INC., for said projectin the amount of $166,100, and the same hereby is accepted; and
BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED THERETO thatacontractbe entered into betweenthe successfulbidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and thatth9-City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to executesaid contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the Iabor maierials bond required to befurnished by the contractor.
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
s : \apubl icworksdir\proj ects\resolutionawud
City Clerk
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
HATCH LANE SEWER REHABILITATION
CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(5)
THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County
of san Mateo, State of california on AUGUST 5, 2CfJ,2, by and berween the cITy oF BURLING-
AME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "city", and KINSEL INDUSTRIES, INC., herein-
after called "Contractor, "
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public
work and improvements herein provided for and execution of this Contract; and
WHEREAS, a notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement
hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, on AUGUST 5, 2002, after notice duly given, the City Council of said City
awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor,
which Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for said improvements; and
WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the construction of said
improvements;
Now, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work.
Contractor shall perform the work described in those Plans & Specifications entitled: HATCH
LANE SEWER REHABILITATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(5).
1
2. The Contract Documents.
The Complete contract consists of the following documents: This Agreement, Notice Inviting
Sealed Proposal, copies of the prevailing wage rates on file with the Director of Public Works, the
accepted Bid, the complete plans, profiles, detailed drawings and State Standard Specifications, Special
Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents.
All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the
Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work
called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if
mentioned in all said documents.
3. Contract Price.
The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above agreed
tO bC dONC, thc SUM Of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-SX AND OO/1OO
dollars ($166,100). Said price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the
event work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and
the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said
amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents.
4. Provisions Cumulative.
The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any
other rights or remedies available to the City.
5. Notices.
All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage
prepaid.
2
Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as
follows: DONALD CHANG, P.E./SR. CIYIL ENGINEER
CITY OF BI,JRLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as
follows:
KINSEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
8121 Broadway, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77Ml
6. Intemretation
As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and
vtce versa.
7. Venue
The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this contract shall be the law of the State
of California, and the forum and venue for such disputes shall be the appropriate Superior or Municipal
Court in and for San Mateo County.
3
. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of four (4)
pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of
this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first
hereinabove written.
CITY OF BT'RLINGAME,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Approved as to form:
City Manager City Attorney
Kinsel Industries, [nc.
Attest:
City Clerk
4
f : \apublicwortsdir\projects\9.2 I \agrmtpub. dpw
AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(5)
THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County
of San Mateo, State of california on AUGUST 5, 2NL by and between the cITy oF BURLING-
AME, amunicipalcorporation, hereinaftercalled "Cityu, andKINSELINDUSTRIES, INC., herein-
after called "Contractor, "
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public
work and improvements herein provided for and execution of this Contract; and
WHEREAS, a notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement
hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, on AUGUST 5, 2C/l/2, after notice duly given, the City Council of said City
awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor,
which Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for said improvements; and
WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into ttris agreement for the construction of said
improvements;
Now, THEREFORE, IT Is AGREED by the parries herero as follows:
1. Scope of work.
Contractor shall perform the work described in those Plans & Specifications entitled: HATCH
LANE SEWER REHABILITATION - CITY PROJECT NO. 9853(5).
1
2. The Contract Documents.
The Complete contract consists of the following documents: This Agreement, Notice Inviting
Sealed Proposal, copies of the prevailing wage rates on file with the Director of Public Works, the
accepted Bid, the complete plans, profiles, detailed drawings and State Standard Specifications, Special
Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents.
All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the
Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work
called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if
mentioned in all said documents.
3. Contract Price.
The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above agreed
tO bC dONE, thE SUrn Of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX AND OO/1OO
dollars ($166,100). Said price is determined by the unit prices conrained in Contractor's Bid. In the
event work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and
the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said
amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents.
4. Provisions Cumulative.
The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any
other rights or remedies available to the City.
5. Notices.
All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage
prepaid.
2
Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as
follows:DONALD CHANG, P.E./SR. CIVIL ENGINEER
CITY OF BI]RLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as
follows:
KINSEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
8121 Broadway, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77061
6. Interpretation
As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and
vlce versa.
7. Venue
The applicable law for any legal disputes arising out of this contract shall be the law of the State
of California, and the forum and venue for such disputes shall be the appropriate Superior or Municipal
Court in and for San Mateo County.
3
" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of four (4)
pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of
this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first
hereinabove wriffen.
CITY OF BI.]RLINGAME,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Approved as to form:
City Manager City Attorney
Kinsel Industries, Inc.
Attest:
City Clerk
4
f lapublicworksdir$rojects\94 2 l\agrmpub.dpw
JUL-?3-0? 18:38 F rom:l-542 P.0Z/0? Job-124
KI.NSEL INDUSTRIES, INC .
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
Iuly 23,2002
Mr. Donald T. Chang, P.E.
The City of Burlingame
ciry Hau
50I Primrose Road
Burlingame, Ca. 94010"3997
Re: Bid Proposal for Hatch Lane Sewer Rehabilitation, Ptoject No, 9853(5)
Deau Mr. Changl
We are in receipt of your fax dated July 19, 2002.We would also like to tak,r this
opportudty to respond and addrcss the City of Burlingame concems.
Kinsel Industies, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Insituform Technologies, Inc.
Insituform Technologies has their local office in Benici4 Ca- Kinsel Indu sfries
headquarters is in Houston, Texas arrd our West Coast office is in Carlsbad, Ca, \l'e are
well aware of the size of tlre project as well as scope oonstruction hours, and looation of
thc projoot. Kinscl has bccu in thg coustruction bwincss sinsc 1967 aud has w:rhcd
ttuoughout the Texas area and the southeast, We are cunently tehabilitating $ewer lines
for JEA in JacksonviUe Florida.
Kinsel's iutent was to utilize out constnrction crews fiom Southenr Califomia wlo are
use to being out of town and worting in Nordrem Califomia. We will htrve e
superilterde,nt on the project site continuously with 24hr on call aunrber. We inte:rd on
firitling a piece of property neqr the project site to use as storage of materialrr and
equiprrrent. Kios€l will rent some of the equipment and mobilize some of our own. tr 'insel
will be available to begin constnrction within 15 days from Notice to Ptoceed' As ttaled
befirre, we are woll awaro of the high proffle of tlris project aad more than capalrlc of
puforming the work as described in the cotrhact doouotents,
If you should have any questioru please do uot hesitste to contact me at my offrce (760)
918-5585 or by cell phoue (619) 89+1186. We are looking foward to a succes lfully
projcot with thc City of Burlingamc.
Sin,rcrely,
David M Arthurs
West Coast Manager
8121 Broadway, Surb 300 , Houslon, T$as 77Ml ' P.O.&ox 75O16O ' ,loutlon, Tcxas 772'5Ql6O
713/611.5111, Fox/ktnating 713/Ar'3U0' Fox/Accountlng 7/B4r'1 .3095
\\
*p
Y t
t
\\
t\'r.)
loo
SITI LOCAIION
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
8t5to2
8e
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT
1
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS - CP 9948
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve by resolution the attached Negative Declaration
for the Wastewater Treatrnent Plan Reliability Improvements.
BACKGROUND: As part of the 2002103 CIP budget, Council approved an $8.8 million Reliability Improvements
Project at the Wastewater Treatrnent Plant which includes replacing aging plant systems and operatingiquipment.
Major components consist of:o Replacement of the sewage sludge dewatering building, including all equipment and systemso Replacement of the secondary aeration system air blowers and diffusion system. Installation of a new SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systemo Modification of the existing Headworks Building to add a receiving station for acceptance of collection
system/pumping station clean-out wastes. Replacement of a worn out gas flare stack
Discussion
An application for State of California revolving loan monies to fund this project is currently being reviewed by the
State. An essential step in the State Revolving fund loan application process is to assess the enviionmental impact
of the project. As all work will be performed within the existing footprint of the wastewater treatment plant, will
largely replace existing facilities and will not increase the treaffnent capacity, the impact of the project is very
minimal.
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, as a subcontract to
the project design firm, Carollo Engineers. This document was circulated to the appropriate federal, state and county
q9ryils as well as posted for commentary from the general public. A 30-day comment period ended on July 15,
2002. Environmental impacts considered included:o Aestheticso Agricultural Resourceso Air Qualityo Biological Resourceso Cultural Resourceso Geology and Soils. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Hydrology and Water Qualrty. Land Use and Planningo Mineral Resourceso Noiseo Population and Housing. Public Serviceso Recreationo Transportation/Traffic. Utilities and Service Systems
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Ju,ly 29,2002
1
2.
Page 2
Because of the minimal environmental impact of the project, few comments were expected. The sole comment
received during the comment period was from the State of California Water Resources Conffol Board in a letter dated
June 28, 2002. The letter indicates that the Study would be acceptable if two concerns were addressed in greater
detail. These are:
Biological Resources - It is requested that the Study be amended to further discuss the impact of the project
on endangered/sensitive species. The comment notes that the potential impact is minimal at best but further
notes that the added discussion is needed to comply with Revolving Fund loan guidelines.
Air Quality - The letter requests that further data be provided demonstrating the project's impact on ozone
levels, if any.
An addendum with additional information responding to the above comments will be provided at the Council
meeting.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Impact study; State Resources control Board trtter
BUDGET IMPACT: Funding is available in the project budget to prepare ttre initial study and negative declaration.
650-558-7230
City Clerk, Meg Monroe, Rich Pernac
S:\A Public Works Directory\Saff Repors\NegDecl4WWTP.w@
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAI\T
RELTABTLITY IMPROVEMENTS (Cp 9948)
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City is preparing to undertake reliability improvements to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant, which will include replacing aging plant systems and operating equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City has undertaken an initial study under the California Environmental
Quality Act to determine if there any potentially significant adverse environmental impacts might result
from the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, comments were sought from concerned State and Federal agencies, and their
comments have been addressed in the negative declaration and will be addressed in the proposed
project; and
WHEREAS, a negative declaration was prepared in conformance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, there are no potentially significant environmental impacts from this
proposed project,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED:
1. The negative declaration prepared for City Project 9948, Wastewater Treatment Plant
Reliability Improvements is approved and adopted. This negative declaration will be considered in
connection with all aspects of the proposed project.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO , City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of__,
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COLINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COLTNCILMEMBERS :
CITY CLERK
lVinston H. Hickox
Secretary for
Environmental
Protectiott
State Water Resources Control Board
Division of Clean Water Programs
1001 IStreet.Sacramento,California 95814.(916)341-5700 FAX(916)341-5701
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 944212. Sacramento, California .94244-2120
Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov
Gray Davis
Goventor
JUN 2 6 N|,?
Mr. George Bagdon, P.E., Director of Public Works
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
EGEIVE
JUll 2 8 ::02
DEPT. OF PUBLIC \^/OBKS
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Dear Mr. Bagdon
INITIAL STTIDY/IVIITIGATED NEGATTVE DECLARATION (ISA{ND) FOR CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLTBLIC WORK.S DEPARTITENT (CmD -- WASTEWATER TREATN{ENT FACTLITY (IVWTF)
MPROVEMENTS PROJECT - STATE REVOLVTNG FL,ND (SRF) LOAN NO. (C-06-4772-rr0)
(scH No. 2002062036)
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above document. We understand that the City will be seeking an
SRF loan from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Division of Clean Water Programs
(Division) for the above project. As a funding agency, the SWRCB will be a responsible agency under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and must consider the information in the environmental
document prepared for the project when deciding whether to approve funding for the proposed project.
Following the public and State Clearinghouse review period, please send us a copy of:
(1) the approved Negative Declaration,
(2) the resolution adopting the document,
(3) all comments received during the review period and your responses, and
(4) the Notice of Determination filed with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research
and San Mateo County when they become available.
In addition, we would appreciate notices of any hearings or meetings scheduled regarding the document and
project approval.
For SRF loans, which are partially funded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Division is
required to consult directly with appropriate federal agencies responsible for implementing federal
environmental laws and regulations. Please provide us with eight copies of the IS/IIND so that we may initiate
federal consultation. Federal agencies have 30 calendar days to review and comment on your environmental
document plus six days mailing time. Accordingly, once we receive copies of your IS/IvIND we will distribute
them to the appropriate federal agencies for a 30-day review period plus six days mailing time. We will
forward any comments received at the end of the review period for your response. Any environmental issues
raised by federal agencies will need to be resolved prior to Division approval of a loan commitment for the
proposed project. It is important to note that SRF loan projects are subject to provisions of the Federal
Endangered Species Act and must obtain a Section 7 clearance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service prior to
loan commitment.
SRF projects must comply with federal laws pertaining to cultural resources, particularly Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. For SRF projects, our Cultural Resources Officer, Ms. Cookie Hirn, will
initiate the Section 106 process. Ms. Hirn will review the cultural resources documentation for Section 106
C alifo rnia E nvir o n m e nt al Prote ctio n A g e n cy
d} Recycled Paper
Mr. Bagdon -2-JUI'i 2 6 2i,l',]
compliance and will forward approved documents to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). For SRF
funding, SI{PO concurrence is required for environmental clearance.
As of January 31,1994, SRF loan projects located in non-attainment areas may be required to meet the Federal
General Conformity Rule for the Federal Clean Air Act. A conformity determination must be made if
emissions from project facilities are above "de minimis" thresholds established for the area. A conformity
determination can be made if a projects emissions are below the de minimis level and are less than 10 percent
of the areas inventory for each criteria pollutant or if facilities are sized to meet only the needs of current
population projections that are used in the approved State Implementation PIan for air quality. The City is
located within the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, which is in non-attainment for ozone. For an
SRF loan you will need to provide information addressing this issue.
The document would be adequate for our purposes if the following comments are addressed:
1. Biological Resources: The IS concludes that the project will not have an adverse impact on rare and
endangered species. We realize that the proposed project is within the existing WWTF, however,
compliance with SRF requirements require the City to provide the Division with a species list, biological
assessment and other documents that disclose or preclude the projects effect on sensitive species. A species
list can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife or California Department of Fish and Game website.
2. Air Quality: The checklist answer states that air quality in Burlingame is satisfactory with few exceedances
in State or federal air quality standards. However, as mentioned above, the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District is in non-attainment for ozone. The City should provide quantitative analysis showing
the projects contribution, or lack of contribution, to existing ozone levels. Emission inventories can be
obtained from the local air pollution control agency.
3. It is important to note that the lead agency is required to develop and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Plan as
part of the MND.
If you have any questions regarding SRF requirements and the environmental review of this project, please
contact me at (916) 341-5667.
Patricia Gouveia
Environmental Services Unit
cc State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, C A 9 58 12-3044
Mr. Rich Condit
San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board
2101 Webster Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA94612
C alifo rnia E nv iro nm e nt al Pro te ctio n A g e n cy
n Recycled Paper
Initial Study/lVlitigated Negative Declaration
City of Burlingame
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Lead Agency
City of Burlingame
Prepared By
Jerry Haag, Urban Planner
June 2002
MEMORANDIJM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: AUGUST 5,2002
ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM 8e REGARDING RESPONSES To
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS.*
TTITIAL STUDYA{ITIGATED NEGATTVE DECLARAI T, N CoMMENTS
TO
RE
-"tr***i:i-r:.
During the Public Notice period for the Initial Study/Ivlitigated Negative Declaration for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant Reliability Improvements Project, comments were received from
the State Water Resources Control Board. The State wished to see additional information in two
areas although it was noted that this was for completeness rather than a criticism of the project or
the Study itself. Responses to the State's request are attached. (The Initial Study and a cLpy of
the State's comment letter are included in the Staff Report.)
In order to appropriately respond to the State's questions, specialized consultants were utilized.
The questions asked by the State along with a synopsis of the responses are provided below.
copies of the complete responses from the consultants are attached.
State Comment:
Compliance with State Revolving Fund requirements requires that the City
provide an analysis of the impact of the project on sensitir : s:ecies.
Consultant Response:
The consultant, James A. Martin/Environmental Collaborative, reviewed the
"special-special species" list for Burlingame and did a field review of site
conditions. His conclusion was that, as the site is frrlly developed, there is no
suitable habitat for endangered species. Further, he noted that no special status
species are known to be present on the site and that no adverse impact is
anticipated from the project.
)State Comment:
Burlingarne is in a non-attainment area for ozone. The State requested
quantitative information beyond that initially provided regarding the impact of the
project on ozone levels.
1
Page2
Attachments : Special-Status Species Assessment
Ozone Conformity Analysis
cc:City Manager
City Planner
City Clerk
Rich Perna, U.S. Filter
S:\A Public Worlcs Directc5flStafr RepatsMcnn - NegDecl4WWIP.wpd
Consultant Response:
The consultant, Donald Ballanti, further reviewed the impact on ozone levels
from the project and concluded that as the facility is not increasing in capacity,
there would be no change in stationary (i.e., long term) emissions. There would
be an impact from construction activities, it was noted; but that impact was
minimal and considered to be below minimum levels.
j
I
ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE
Consultalion . Documentation . Restoration
1268 64th Street . Emeryville, CA 94608
Phone 510/69-4444 . FAX 510/65$4444
Mr. Rick Chan
Carollo Engineers
27OO Ygnacio ValleY Road, Suite 3OO
Walnut Creek, Califomia 94598
SUBJECT: Potential for Occurrence of SpeciaFstatus Species
Burlingame Wastewater Treatment Facility Site
Burlingame, Califomia
Dear Rick:
As vou and Jerrv Haaq requested, lconducted an assessment ofthe potential for
occirnence ot sp'eciat-dtatu! specids at the Burlingame VVastewater Treatment along
Airport Boubvdrd in Burlingame, Califomia. Be-low is a summary of the methods,
eii'sting conditions, and findings'regarding the potential for specia_l-status species
on theiite. Based'on my fieldrecohnaiss:ance ind absence of suitable habitat, no
soecial-status species aie believed to occur on the site, and no adverse impacts on
ahy special-status species are anticipated.
Methods
I conducted a field reconnaissance of the sile on 3O July 2OO2. The perimeter of the
facilitv was inspected and the potential for occunence of any special-status species
oi ottier sensltive biological rdsources was made visually. A request w?s made to
the U.S. Fish and VMldlfre Service for a list of special-special-slatus species knop or
iusoeAed from the Burlingame vicinity. This list of over 15O listed and candidate
io"bleJ is attached. and odnsists of plant and animal species known from a variety
oi niUitat types. The purpose of ttie field reconnaisCan@ was to determine the
naOitat ahaaderistics'of ihe sre, and potential presence of suilable h-abitat for
Soeciii-stitui species. No detailed suiveys weie performed as part ol the field
iSconnaissance or are believed necessary Sased onihe developed condition ofthe
site.
Existing Conditions
The site has been completely developed with facilities associated with the treatment
"i"ni Eiistino cover ii limilbd to pavement, tanks, buildings, fencing, and tanbark
Sioiid tnG Airp"ort Boulevard frontage of the'site. An access road, parkinq_lol, anq
oma"m6ntat ldndscaping consisting-primarilyof trees and turf occur in the City p.ark
i6 ifre weii and south.- A former-ldndfill with side slopes covered with non-native
oiisstanO and ruderal species occurs to the east of the sile. Airport Boulevard, the
Eay Trail, and tidal wat6rs of San Francisco Bay o@ur to the north.
No specific occurTences of species wilh special-status have been mapped on the
Mr. Rich Chan
31 July 2OO2
Page 2
site bythe Califomia Natural Diversity Basel. A generaloccunence of the State and
federally--_endangered Califomia clapper rail (Ral/us longirostis obso/efus) was
reported from the bay in 1975, but suitable habitat for this species is absent fr<im thesite. An occurence of Franciscan qniol (Allium pninulare varfranciscanum), which
has no State orfederallisting status but is considered rare (List 1B) bythe CilifomiaNative Plant Society, was reported from the shoreline of Burlinjame in 1895.
However, any suitable habitat for Franciscan onion and other specla!-status plant
species has been eliminated from the sile.
Findings
Suitable habitat for special-status species is absent from the site, and no adverse
irypaqtg ol a!-y listed species are anticipated as a result of improvements on thesite. No detailed surveys are believed necessary to confirm prbsence or absence
of any listed or candidate species due to the complete absentp of suilable habitat.
l.hope this provides you wilh the information necessary to complete your review of
Lhg-plqpoged ptoject at the treatment facility site. Plealse feelfiee to contact me at
51016544444 rt you have any questions of would like any additional information.
Sincerely,
RON RATIVE
A.M
pal
A ment: USFV\ S list dated July 29, 2OO2
Califomia Natrral Divercity Data Bae, 2OO2, r*qd search of the San Mdeo 7.5' U.S.G.S. quadrangle,dded 12 April.
2
I
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AIYD WILDLITE SERYICE
SacramentoFish end Wildlifc Offrce
28fi1 Cottage Wa5 Room W-26115
Sacramento, California 95825
INREPLY REFERTO:
l-t-02-sP-27u
luly 29,2A02
Mr. Jim Martin
Environmental Collaborative
1268 64th Street
Emeryville, Califomia 94608
Subject:species List for Several Environmental collaborative Projects in the
Burlingame Area, San Mateo County, California
Dear Mr. Martin:
We are sending the enclosed list in response to your luly 22,z}Oz,request for information about
endangered and threatened species (Enclosure A). The list covers the following U.S. Geological
Survey 7/zminute quad or quads: Montara Mountain and San Mateo euads.
Please read Important Informatton About Your Species List (enclosed). It explains how we made
the list and describes your responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. Please contact
Tracy Davis at (916) 414-6625, if you have any questions about the attached list or your
responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. For the fastest response to species list
requests, address them to the attention of Species Lists at this address. You may fax requests to
414-6712 or 414-6713. You may also email them to harry_mossman@fus.gov.
Sincerely,
rl,jJ
C^.
Jan C. Knight
Chief, Endangered Species Division
Enclosures
Important Information
About Your Species List
How We Make Species Lists
We store information about endangered and threatened species lists by U.S. Geological Sttrvey 7Yz
minule quads. The United States is divided into these quads, which are about the size ofSan Francisco.
Ifyou requested your list by quad name or number, that is what we used. Otherwise, we used the
information you sent us to determine which quad or quads to use.
Animals
The animals on your species list are ones that occur within, or may be affected by projects within, the
quads covered by the list. Fish and other aquatic species appear on your list ifthey are in the same
watershed as your quad or if watsl usg in vnur quad might affect them. Amphibians will be on the list
for a quad or cormty ifpesticides applied in that area may be carried to their habitat by air currents.
Birds are shown regardless of whether they are resident or migratory. Relevant birds on the county list
should be considered regardless of whether they appear on a quad list.
Plants
Any plants on your list are ones that have aclually been observed in the quad or quads covered by the
Iist. we have also included either a county species Iist or a list of species in nearby quads. we
recommend that you check your project area for these plants. Plants may exist in an area without ever
having been detected there.
Surveying
Some of the species on your list may not be affected by your project. A trained biologist or botanist,
familiar with the habitat requirements of the species on your list, should determine wiether they or
habitats suitable for them may be affecteo !7 your project. We recommend that your surveys include
any proposed and candidate species on your list. For plant surveys, we reconrmend using the enclosed
Guidelines for Conducting ond Reporting Botanical Inventories for Federally Listed, Proposed and
Candidate Specr'es. The results ofyour surveys should be published in any environmental documents
prepared for your project.
State-Listed Species
Ifa species has been listed as threatened or endangered by the State of Califomi4 but not by us nor by
the National Marine Fisheries Service, it will appear on your list as a Species of Con cem. However
you should contact the Califtrnia Department of Fish and Game for ofiicial information obout these
species. Call (916) 322-2493 or write Marketing Manager, Califomia Department of Fish and Game,
Natural Diversity Data Base, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, California 95g 14.
Your Responsibilities Under the Endangered Species Act
All plan* and animals identified as /lited on Enclosure A are fully protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. Section 9 ofthe Act and its implementing regulations prohibit the
take of a federully listed wildlife species. Take is defined by the Act as "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect" any such animal. Take may include significant habitat
modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing
essential behavioral pattems, including breeding, feeding, or shelter (50 CFR $17.3).
Take incidental to an otherwise lawfirl activity may be authorized by one of two procedures:
Ifa Federal agency is involved with the permitting, funding, or carrying out ofa project that
may rezult in take, then that agency must engage in a formal consultatron with the Service.
During formal consultation, the Federal agency, the applicant and the Service work together
to avoid or minimize the impact on listed species and their habitat. Such corsultation would
rcsult in a biological opinion by the Service addressing the anticipated effect of the project
on listed and proposed species. The opinion may authorize a limited level of incidental take.
If no Federal agency is involved with the project, and federally listed species may be taken
as part ofthe project, then you, the applicant, should apply for an incidental tol@ permit. The
Service may issue such a permit ifyou submit a satisfactory conservation plan for the
species that would be affected by your project. Should your survey determine that federally
listed or proposed species occur in the area and are likely to be affected by the project, we
recommend that you work with this oftice and the Califomia Department of Fish and Game
to develop a plan that minimizes the project's direct and indirect impacts to listed species
and compensates for project-related loss of habitat. You should include the plan in any
environmental documents you file.
When a species is listed as endangered or threatened, areas ofhabitat considered essential to its
conservation may be designated as critical habitat. These areas may require sp,:ciaFmanagement
considerations or protection. They provide needed space for growth and normal behavior; food, water,
air, light, other nutritional or physiological requirements; cover or shelter; and sites for breeding,
reproduction, rearing ofoffspring, germination or seed dispersal.
Although critical habitat may be designared on private or State lands, activities on these lands are not
resticted unless there is Federal involvement in the activities or direct harm to listed wildlife.
Ifany species has proposed or designated critical habitat within a quad, there will be a separate line for
this on the species list. Maps and bourdary descriptions of the critical habitat may be found in the
Federal Register. The information is also reprinte d inthe Code of Federat Regularrblrs (50 cFR
17.9s).
Critical Habitat
Candidate Species
We recommend that you address impacts to candidate species. We put plants and animals on our
candidate list when we have enough scientific information to eventually propose them for listing as
tlreatened or endangered. By considering these species early in your plaruring process you may be
able to avoid the problems that could develop ifone ofthese candidates was listed before the end of
your project.
Your list may contain a section called Species ofConcern. This term includ es former category 2
candidate species and other plants and animals ofconcem to the Service and other Federal, State and
private conservation agencies and organizations. Some of these species may become candidate species
in the future.
Wetlands
Ifyour project will impact wetlands, riparian habitat, or other jurisdictional waters as defined by
section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or section l0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, you will need to
obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Impacts to wetland habitats require site
specific mitigation and monitoring. For questions regarding wetlands, please contact Mark Littlefield
ofthis office at (916) 414-6580.
Updates
Our database is constantly updated as species are proposed, listed and delisted. Ifyou address
proposed, candidate and special concern species in your planning, this should not be a problem. We
also continually strive to make our information as accuate as possible. Sometimes we leam that a
particular species has a different range than we thought. This should not be a problem if you consider
the species on the county or surrounding-quad lists that we have enclosed. Ifyou have a long-term
project or ifyour project is delayed, please feel free to contact us about getting a current list. You can
also Iind out the current status of a species by going to the Service,s Intem et page: www.fws.gov
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING AND REPORTING BOTANICAL II.N/ENTORIES
FOR FEDERALLY LISTED, PROPOSED AND CANDIDATE PLANTS
(Septernber 23, 1996)
These guidelines describe protocols for conducting botanical inventories for federally listed, proposed
and candidate plants, and describe minimum standards for reporting results. The Service wil! use, in
part, the information outlined below in determining whether the project under consideration may
aflect any listed, proposed or candidate plants, and in determining the direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects.
Field inventories should be conducted in a manner that will locate listed, proposed, or candidate
species (target species) that may be present. The entire project area requires a botanical inventory,
except developed agricultural lands. The field investigator(s) should:
1 . Conduct inventories at the appropriate times ofyear when target species are present and identifi-
able. Inventories will include all potenti: I habitats. Multiple site visits during a field season may
be necessary to make observations during the appropriate phenological stage ofall target species.
2. If available, use a regional or local reference population to obtain a visrral image ofthe target
species and associated habitat(s). If access to reference populations is not available, investigators
should study specimens from local herbaria.
3. List every species observed and compile a comprehensive list of vascular plants for the entire
project site. Vascular plants need to be identified to a taxonomic level which allows rarity to be
determined.
4. Report results of botanical field inventories that include:
a. a description ofthe biological setting, including plant community, topography, soils, potential
habitat of taryet species, and an evaluation of environmental conditions, such as timing or
quantity of rainfall, which may influence the performance and expression of target species
b. a map of project location showing scale, orientation, project boundaries, parcel size, and
map quadrangle name
c. survey dates and survey methodology(ies)
d. ifa reference population is available, provide a written narrative describing the target species
reference population(s) used, and date(s) when observations were made
e. a comprehensive list of all vascular plants occrming on the project site for each habitat type
f. cunent and historic land uses ofthe habitat(s) and degree ofsite alteration
g. presence oftarget species off-site on adjacent parcels, ifknown
h. an assessment of the biological significance or ecological quality of the project site in a local
and regional context
5. If target species is(are) found, report results that additionally include:
a. a map showing federally listed, proposed and candidate species distribution as they relate to
the proposed project
b.if target species is (are) associated with wetlands, a desctiption of the direction and integrity
of flow of surface hydrology. If target species is (are) affected by adjacent oflsite hydrolog-
ical influences, describe these factors.
c.the target species phenology and microhabitat, an estimate of the number of individuals of
each target species per unit area; identify areas of high, medium and low density of target
species over the project site, and provide acres ofoccupied habitat oftarget species.
Investigators could provide color slides, photos or color copies of photos of target species or
representative habitats to support information or descriptions contained in reports.
d. the degree of impact(s), if any, of the proposed project as it relates to the potential unoccu-
pied habitat of target habitat.
6. Docurnent findings of target species by cornpleting CalifomiaNative Species Field Survey Form(s)
and submit form(s) to the Natural Diversity Data Base. Documentation of determinations and/or
voucher specimens may be useful in cases of taxonomic ambiguities, habitat or range extensions.
7. Report as an addendum to the original survey, any change in abundance and distribution of target
plants in subsequent years. Project sites with inventories older than three years from the current
date of project proposal submission will likely need additional survey. Investigators need to
assess whether an additional zurvey(s) is (are) needed.
8. Adverse conditions may prevent investigato(s) from determining presence or identifring some
target species in potential habita(s) of target species. Disease, drought, predarron, or herbivory
may preclude the presence or identification of target species in any year. An additional botanical
inventory(ies) in a subsequent year(s) may be required if adverse conditions occur in a potential
habitat(s). Investigato(s) may need to discuss such conditions.
9. Guidance from Califomia Departrnent of Fish and Game (CDFG) regarding plant and plant
community surveys can be found in Guidelines for Assessing the Effects of Proposed Develop
ments on Rare and Endangered Plants andPlant Communities, 1984. Please contact the CDFG
Regional Office for questions regarding the CDFG guidelines and for assistance in determining
any applicable State regulatory requirements.
ENCLOSURE A
Endangered and Threalened Species that May OcqJr in or be Affected by
PROJECTS IN SAN MATEO COUNTY
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-2744
July 29,2@2
Listed Species
Mammals
sei whale, Balaenoptera brealis (E) NMFS
blue whale, Balaenoptera musculus (E) NMFS
finback (=fin) whale, Balaenoptera physalus (E) NMFS
right whale, Eubalaena gtaciatls (E) NMFS
'humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangr,ae (E) NMFS
sperm wlrale, myse/€r catodon (=macrocephalus) (E) NMFS
salt marsh harvest mouse, Reftrrrodortomys nviventis (E)
Guadalupe fur seal, Arctocephalus townsendi (T) NMFS
southem sea oller, Enhydra lutis nereis (T)
Steller (=nsrtlisr.) seaJion, Eumetopias jubatus O) NMFS
Birds
short-tailed albatross, Diomedea atbatrus (E)
California brown pelican, perecanus accidentatis califomicus (E)
Califomia clapper rail, Rarrus lengr?osfrs obso/etus (E)
Califomia least tem, &ema antillarum (=albifrons) browni (El
Critical habitat, marbled munelet, Bmch@mphus marmorarus (T)
marbled murrelet, Brachyramphus mamontus (T)
Critical habitat, westem snowy plove\ Chaadius atexaflinus rlvosus Cf)
westem snowy plovet, Charadius alexandrdnus rrvosus (T)
bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephatus (T)
Reptiles
leatherback tur e , Dormochetys ariacea (E) NMFS
San Francisco garter snake, Thamnoph:s siftatis tetrataenia (E)
Reference File No. I -1{2€P-2744
loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta (T) NMFS
green turtle, Chelonia mydas (incl. agassizi) (T) NMFS
olive (=psgiti.1 ridley Sea turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea fi) NMFS
Amphibians
California tiger salamander, Ambystona califomiense (CIE)
California red-leggdftq, Rana aurora drartonii (T)
Critical habitat, Califomia redJegg ed lrog, Rana aurora draytonii (fl
Fish
tidewaler goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (E)
winter-run chinook salmon, Oncorhy fihus tshawytscha (E) NMFS
Critical habitat, coho salmon - central CA coast, Onarhynchus kis.lcn (T) NMFS
coho salmon - central CA coast, Oncorhynchus kisurcr, (T) NMFS
Central California Coastal steelhead , Oncorhynchus m:|.,(,ss (T) NMFS
Critical habitat, Central Califomia coastal steelhead , Onarhynchus mykiss (T) NMFS
Critical habitat, Central Vatley steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss (T) NMFS
Central Valley spring-run chinook satmon, Oncorhynchus tsha4scha (T) NMFS
critical Habirat, central valley spdng-run chinook, oncorhynchus tshalrytscf,a o) NMFS
Sacramento splittail, Pogonichthys macrotepidotus (T)
delta smelt, Hypomesus transpacrlicus (T) .
lnvertebrates
white abalone, Harbres sorenseni (E) NMFS
mission blue butterfly, lcaicia icadofues missionensis (E)
San Bruno elfin bulle ty, tncisalia rrossl bayensis (E)
callippe silverspot butterfly, SrE.yela caltipry cattippe (E)
Critical habitat, bay checkerspot bu,'tefiy, Euphydryas editha bayensis (T)
bay checkerspot bufierfly, Euphydryas editha bayonsis A
Ohlone tiger beede, Cicindeta ohtone (E) "
Plants
San Mateo thomminl, Acanthon intha duttonii (E)
Page 2
Reference File No. 'l-1{2-SP-2744
Page 3
fountain thistle, Cksium fontinale var. fontinafe (E)
Santa Cruz cypress, Cupressus abramsiana (E)
San Mateo woolly sunflower, Eiophyttum tatilobum (E)
San Francisco lessingia, Lessrhgia germanorun lE)
white.rayed pentachaeta, pentachaeta beltidiflon (E)
Hickman's potentilla (=cinquefo ), Potentitta hickmanii (E)
Marin dwarf-flax (=westem flax), Hesperolinon congestum (T)
robust spineflower, Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta (El .
Candldate Sp€f,les
Fish
central valley fall/late fall-run chinook salmon, oncothwchus tsharaytscfa (c) NMFS
critical habitat, central valley fulutate fall-run chinook, oncorhynchus tsha$ryrscrra (c) NMFS
lnvertebrates
black abalone, Hatiot9s crachercdii (C) NMFS
Species of Concem
Mammals
gray whale, Escrrrctlrius robusfus (D) NMFS
Paciftc westem big-eared bat, Corynorhinus (=ptecotus) townsendii townsendii (SC)
greater westem mastiff-bat, Eumops perctis catifomicus (SC)
long-eared myotis bat, Mptis evotrs (SC)
fringed myotis bat, Mrloris ttysanodes (SC)
long-legged myotis bat, Myotis volans (SC)
Yuma myotis bat, Myotis yumanensis (SC)
San Francisco duskyJooted woodral, Neotoma fuscipes an ecfers (SC)
salt marsh vagrant shrew, SorBx yagrans rarboetes (SC)
Birds
little willow ffycatcher, Empidonax traillii brewsbn (CAl
black rail, Laterallus jamaicensis cotumiculus (CA)
Reference File No.'l-1-02-SP-2744
bank swallow, Nparia riparia (CA)
American peregrine falcon, Falco pereginus anatum (D)
tricolored blackbird , Agelaius ticolor (SC)
grasshopper spanow, Ammodramus savannarum (SC)
Bell's sage spanow, Amphispiza beliberr, (SC)
short-eared owl, lsio llammeus (SC)
westem bunowing clul, Athene cunicutaia hypugaea (SC)
American bittem, Boraurus /entigirosus (SC)
ferruginous hawk, Arleo regalls (SC)
Costa's hummingbird, Ca/yple coslae (SC)
Lawrence's goldfinch, Carduetis tawrencei (SC)
Vaux's swift, Chaetura vauxi (SC)
olive-sided flycatcher, Contqpus cooperi (SC)
black swift, Cypseloides niger (SC)
hermit warbler, Dendroica occidentals (SC)
white-tailed (=black shouldered) kite, Elanus /eucurus (SC)
common loon, Gavia immer (SC)
saltmarsh common yellowthroat, Geothtypis lrichas sinuosa (SC)
Harlequin duck, Hislnbnrbus hlstnioabus (SC)
least b;ttem, westem,lxobtychus exitis t espenis (SC)
loggerhead shrike, Lanius /udoviclanus (SC)
Alameda (South Bay) song spanow , Melospiza mebdiapusrllu/a (SC)
long-billed curlew, Nurnenius amerbanus (SC)
ashy storm-petrel , Oceanodrcma homoct roa (SC)
rufous hummingbird, Se/aspiorus rufus (SC)
Allen's hummingbird, Se/asphorus sasi, (SC)
elegant tem, Stema e/egans (SC)
Xantus' murrelet, Syt lhliboi?,mphus hypleucus (SC)
Page 4
Reference File No. 1-1{2-SP-27214 Page 5
Califomia thrasher, Toxostoma redivivum (SCl
Reptiles
norlhwestem pond turtle, Clemmys matmorata marmonta (SC)
southwestern pond turlle, Clemmys marmonta pattida (SC)
Califomia homed lizard, Phrynosoma coronatum frontate (SC)
Amphibians
foothill yellow-tegged frog, Rana boytii (SCl
Fish
green sturgeon, Acipenser medhosrnis (SC)
river lamprey, Lampetra ayresi (SC)
Paciflc lamprey, Lampetra tddentata (SCl
Iongfin smelt, Splrinchus thaleichthys (SC)
lnvertebrates
Opler's longhorn molh, Adela oplerelta (SC)
Edgewood blind harvestman , Caticina minor (SC)
sandy beach tiger beefle, Cicindela hlrticottis gravida (SC)
globose dune beetle, Coelus g/obosas (SC)
Ricksecker's water scavenger beeu e, Hydrochan tickseckor, (SC)
Leech's skyline diving beeUe, Hydroporus leechi (SC)
Marin elfin butterfly, ,rcAsa/ia mossjl ma.niaeasis (SC)
bumblebee scarab betle, Lichnan#re ursina (SC)
Edgewood microblind harvestrnan, Microcina edgewoodensis (SC)
unsilvered fritillary butterfly, Speye/,'a adiasle adiasfe (SC)
Plants
San Bruno Mountain nanzanila, Ardostaphylos infutcata (CA)
Point Reyes meadowfoam, Limnanthes douglasii ssp. sulphurea (CA)
Montara manzanira, Arctosta phylos monlaraensis (SC)
San Francisco Bay spineflower, Chotizanthe cuspidata var. cuspidata (SC)
clustered lady's-slipper, Cypripedium fascicurarum (SC)
Reference File No. 1-1-O2-SP-27M Page 6
coast wallflower, Erysimum ammophilum (SCl
San Francisco wallflower, Erysimum franciscanum (SQ)
Hillsborough chocolate lily (= 6r"r'* fritillary), Frltiltarta biflora var ineziana (=F. grayana) (SC)
fragrant fritillary 1= prairie bells), Fritillaia liltacea (SC)
San Francisco gumplanl, Gindelia hirsutula var. maritima (SC)
Diablo helianthella (=rock+osel, Helianthella castanea (SC)
Kellogg's horkelia, Horkelia cuneata ssp. sericea (SC)
Point Reyes horkelia, Horkelia mannensis (SC)
legenere, Legenere /imosa (SC)
Crystal Springs lessingia, Lessingia arachnoide a (SC)
large-fl owered (=fl ower) linanthus, Li n anthUs grandiflorus (SCl
rose linanthus, Linanthus rosaceus (SC)
Dudley's lousewort, Pediculads dudleyi (SCl
Mission Delores (=San Francisco) campion, Silene verecunda ssp. verecunda (SC)
dune 1=ssmphor) tansy, Tanacetum camphoratum (SCl
water sack (=saline) clover, Trifolim depaupentum var. hydrophlum (SC)
San Francisco owl's-clover, Tiphysaria floribuNa (SCl
pink sand-verbena, Abrania umbellata ssp. umbellata (SLC)
Franciscan onion, Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum (SLC)
bent-flowered fiddleneck, Amsinckia lunaris (SLC)
coast rock-cress, Arabis blepharophylla (SLC)
Santa Cruz manzanita, Arctostaphylos andersonii (SLC)
Kings Mountain manzanita, Arctostaphylos regismontana (SLC)
Nuttall's milk-vetch, Astragalus nuttallii var. virgatus (SLC)
marsh milkvetch (=brine milk-vetch), Astragalus pycnostachyus var. pycnostachyus (SLC)
Califomia saltbush, Atiplex califomica (SLC)
Coast lndian paintbrush, Castilleja affinis spp. affinis (SLC)
salt marsh owl's clover (=johnny-nipl, Castilleja ambigua ssp. ambigua (SLC)
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-2744 Page 7
purple owl's-clover (=wideleaf lndian paintbrush), Castilleja exseffta ssp. /a,folia (SLC)
California goosefoot, Chenopodium califomicum (SLC)
Davy's clarkia, Clarkia davyi (SLCI
westem leathen rood, Dirca occidentalis (SLC)
Tiburon buckwheal, Eriogonum caninum (SLC)
perennial goldfields, Lasthenia macrantha ssp rnacrantha (SLC)
San Mateo tree lupine, Lupinus atfureus var. exmius (SLC)
ardrate bush mallwt, Malacothamnus arcutatus (=M- fascrbulatJ (SLC)
robust monardella (=robust coyote minl), Monardella vil/osa ssp g/obosa (SLC)
Choris's (=artbt's) popcom-flower, Plagiobothrys cholsianus var chonsianus (SLC)
pine rose, Rosa pinetorum (SLC)
Marin checkermallow (=checkerbloom), Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. yiridis (SLC)
purple-stemmed (=dwarf) checkerbloom, Sidalcea malvaeflora ssp purpurea (SLC)
Pacific cordgrass (=Califomia cordgrass), Sparina foibsa (SLC)
Franciscan thistle, Crsr'irm ardrowsri (SC) '
northcoast (=Point Reyes) bird's-beak, Cotdylanthus maitimus ssp. palust,b (SC) .
coast lily, Liliun maritimum (SC) '
slinkbells, Fritiilaria agrestis (SLC) '
marsh microseris (=marsh silverpuffs), Mrbrosens palodosa (SLC) .
curly-leaved (=curlyleaO monardella, Monardella undulara (SC) .
Gairdne/s yampah, Peideridia gaidnel ssp. gairdnei (SC) .
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-27/H
KEY
Page I
Listed (in the Federal Registeo as being in danger of extinction.
Listed as likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future.
Officially proposed (in the Federal Register) for listing as endangered or threatened.
Proposed as an area essential to lhe conservation of lhe species-
Candidate to become a proposed species.
Other species of concern to the Service.
Species of local or regional concem or @nservation signmcance.
Delisted. Status to be monitored for 5 years.
Listed as threatened or endangered by the State of Califomia.
Under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Contact them dhecfly.
Possibly extirpated fiom the area.
Possibly extinct
Area essential to the conservation of a species.
(E)
(r)
(P)
(Px)
(c)
(sc)
(sLc)
(D)
(CA)
NMFS
ENangered
Threatened
Proposed
Proposed
Criucal Habitat
Candidate
Specrbs of
Concem
Specr'es of
Local Concem
Delisted
Sfate-Listed
NMFS species
Ertiryated
Extinct
Crilical Habitat
ENCLOSURE A
Endangered and Threatened Species that May Ocanr in
or be Affected by Projects in the Selected Quads Listed Below
Reference File No- 1-1-02-SP-2744
July 29, 2002
QUAD: 448C MONTARAMOUNTAIN
fisred Species
Mammals
Guadalupe fur seal, Ardocophalus townsendi G) NMFS
sei whale, Balaenoptera borealis (E) NMFS
blue whale, Balaenoplera musculus (E) NMFS
finback 1=6n; ta66le, Balaenoplera physalus (E) NMFS
right whale, Eubalaena glacialis (E) NMFS
sperm whale, Physeler catdon (--macrocephalus) (E) NMFS
salt marsh hawest mouse, Reithrodontomys raviventis (E)
Birds
Critical habitat, marbled murrelet, Brachyramphus marmoratus (T)
marbled munelet, Brachyramphus marmoratus (T)
western snowy plover, Charadius alexandnhus nirosus (T)
short-tailed albatross, Diamedea albafrus (E)
bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus (T)
California brown pelica,n, Pelecanus occidentalis califomicus (E)
Califomia clapper rail, Ral/us ,orlgirosrris obsoletus (E)
Calibmia least tem, Stema antillarum (=albifrons) browni (E)
Repliles
San Francisco garter snake, Thamnophis slialis telrataenia (E)
Amphibians
California re+legged frag, Rana aurora dnytonii (T)
Critical habitat, California red-legged frog, Rana auron dnytonii (fl
Fish
tidewater goby, Eucyclogabius newbenyi (El
delta smell, Hypornesus transpacificus (f
coho salmon - central CA coast, Oncohynchus kisutch Cf) NMFS
Central California Coastal steelhead, Oncorhwchus mykiss CI) NMFS
Cenfal Valley steelhead, Oncorhwchus mylriss (T) NMFS
Sacramento splittail, Pogonichthys macalepidotus (T)
lnvertebrates
white abalone, Hal,bles sorenser,, (E) NMFS
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-2744
mission blue butterfly, lcaricia icarioides missonensis (E)
San Bruno elfin butterfly, /ncrba/ra ,nossii bayensis (E)
Plants
white-rayed pentachaeta, Pentachaeta be idiflora (El '
Hickmant potentilla 1=c;nqr"to',r, Potenti a hickmanii (E)
Candidata Species
lnvertebrates
black abalone, Haliotos cmcherodii (C) NMFS
Species of Concem
Mammals
Paciftc westem bigFeared bat, Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) townsendii lownsendii (SC)
gray whale, Esct bhlr'us robuslus (O) NMFS
greater westem mastiff-bat, Eumops perotis carifomrbus (SC)
long-eared myotis bat, Myot s evofis (SC)
fringed myotis bat, Myot:s tf,ysanodes (SC)
long-legged myotis bal, Myoris volars (SC)
Yuma myotis bat, Myolis yumanensrs (SC)
San Francisco dusky-footed woodral, Ndotoma fusclpes annectens (SC)
Bhds
tricolored bfackbird , Agelaius tricolor (SC)
grasshopper sparrow, Ammdramus savannarum (SC)
Bell's sage spanow, Amphispiza ba ibeli (SC)
short-eared owl, Asio flammeus (SC)
western burrowing olul, Athene cunicularia hypugaea (SC)
fer'uginous hawk, Bufeo regaris (SC)
Costa's hummingbird, Calyple coslae (SC)
Lativrence's goldfi nch, Carduelis lawrencei (SC)
Vaux's swn, Chaetura vauxi (SCl
black tem, Chlidonias niger (SC)
black swifl, Cypselrr?es nrQer (SC)
hermit warbler, Dedroica occidentalis (SC)
white-[ailed (=black shouldered) ki|c, Etanus leuculus (SC)
little willow flycatch er, Empidoiax tnaittii brewstei (CA)
American peregrine falcon, Falco pereginus anatun (O)
sallmarsh common yellowthroat, Geolhlypis trichas sinuosa (SC)
Harlequin duc*, Histionbus histrionicus (S,C')
Page 2
Reference File No. 1-1{2-SP-2744
loggerhead shrike, Lanius ludovicianus (SC)
black rail, Laterallus jamaicensis cofumicurus (CA)
Lewis' woodpecker, Meranerpes /ewts (SC)
long-billed curlew, Numenius ameicanus (SC)
ashy storm-p€trel , Oceanod,oma homochroa (SC)
bank swallow, Riparia rtpaia (CA)
rufous hummingbird, Se/asphorus rufus (SC)
Allen's hummingbird, Se/asphorus sasin (SC)
elegant tem, Srema elegans (SC)
Reptiles
northwestem pond turfle, Clemmys marmorata marmorata (SCl
southwestem pond lur e, Clemmys narnorcta pa ida (SCl
Califomia horned lizard, Phrynosoma coronatum frontate (SC)
Amphibians
foothill yellow{egged frog, Rana boylil (SC)
Fish
Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tn'dentata (SC)
longfin smelt, Spiinchus thaleichlhys (SC)
lnvertebrates
sandy beach tiger beelle, Cicindela hhlicollis gravida (SC)
globose dune beetle, Coelus g/obosus (SC)
Ricksecke/s water scavenger beelle, Hydrochara icksec*e, (SC)
Leech's skyline diving beetle, Hydroporus teechi (SCl
bumblebee scarab be6Ue, Lichnanthe urslna (SC\
Plants
pink sand-verben a, Abronia umbeltaLa ssp. umbelata (SLC)
Franciscan onion, Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum (SLC)
bent-flowered fiddleneck, Amsinckia /u,arr3 (SLC)
coast roc*rress, Arabis blepharophylla (SLC)
Santa Cruz manzanita, Arctostaphylos andersonii (SLC)
Montara manzanita, Arctostaphylos monlaraerss (SC)
Kings Mountain manzanila, Arctostaphyl6 regismontana (SLC)
Nuttall's milk-vetch, Asthgalus nutallii var. virgatus (SLC)
marsh milkvetch (=brine milk-vetch), Astragalus pycnostachyus var. pycnostacrryus (SLC)
Califomia saltbush, Atriplex calffomica (SLC)
Coast lndian paintbrush, Castilteja affinis spp. a/??nris (SLC)
salt marsh owl's cJover (=johnny-nip), Castilbja amb@ua ssp. ambrgua (SLC)
Page 3
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-2744
purple olvl's-clover (=wideleaf lndian painlbrush), Castilleja exserrta ssp. ,atiforia (SLC)
California goosefool, Chenopdium califomicum (SLC) "
San Francisco Bay spineflower, Chorizanthe cuspidata var. cuspidata (SC\
Franciscan thistle, Crsium andreursl (SC)
DaW's clarkia, ClaNa clavyi (SLC)
Round-headed Chinese houses, Co insia cotymbosa (SC) t?
westem leatheMood, Dhca occidentalis (SLC)
Tiburon buckwheal, Eriryonum caninum (SLC)
San Francisco walno', er, Etysimum franciscanum (SC)
tragrant fritillary (= prairte bells), Frili aia,Tracea (SC)
San Francisco gumplani Gindelia hirsutula var. maritima (SC)
Point Reyes nork.elia, Ho*elia manirensis (SC)
Crystal Springs lessingia, Lessingia anchnoidea (SC)
large-flowered (=flower) linanlhus, Unanthus granditTorus (SC)
rose linanthus, Lrhanlhus rosaceus (SC)
San Mateo tree lupine, Lupinus atboreus var. ex,mius (SLC)
arcuale bush mallo^ , Malacothamnus arcutatus (=M. fascicula, (SLC)
curly-leaved (=curlyleaQ rnonardella, Monardella undulara (SC) -?
Mission Delores (=San Francisco) campion, Si/ene verccunda ssp. yerecunda (SC)
Pacific cordgrass (=Califomia cordgrass), Spadna follosa (SLC)
dune (=camphor) lansy, Tanacetum camphontum (SCl
San Francisco owl'sdover, Tiphysada floibunda (SC)
QUAD: 448D SAN MATEO
Lisled Species
Mammals
Steller 1=n66pr) sea-lion, Eumetopias juhatus O) NMFS
salt marsh harvesl mouse, Reithrodontomys raviventris (E)
Birds
marbled munelet, Brachyramphus mamrontus (T,
westem snowy plover, Charadrius alexadrinus n vosus (T)
bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocepharus (T)
Califomia brown pelican, Pelecanus occidentalis califomicus (E)
Califomia clapper rail, Ra//us longinaslris obso/etus (E)
Califomia least tem, S:lema antillerum (=albihons) browni (E)
Reptiles
loggerhead turtle, Caretta carctta (r) NMFS
Page 4
Reference File No. 1-1{2-SP-2744 Page 5
green turtle, Chelonia mydas (incl. agassizi) (T) NMFS
lealherback lurfle, Dermochelys coriacea (E) NMFS
olive (=Pacific) ridley sea turtle, Lepidochelys olivacea O) NMFS
San Francisco garter snake, Thamnophis shtalis tetrataenia (E)
Amphibians
Caf ifomia red-legged frog, Rana aurora draytonii (T)
Critical habitat, Califomia red-legged ftog, Rana auron draytonii (T\
Fish
delta smelt, Hypomesus transpacifcus (T)
coho salmon - central CA coast, Oncorhynchus kisufch (T) NMFS
Central California Coastal sleelhead , Oncothynchus mykiss (I) NMFS
Central Valley steelhead, Oncohyncr,us mykiss (T) NMFS
winter:run chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tsha@scha (E) NMFS
Central Valley spring.run chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tsharytscha (T) NMFS
Critical Habitat, Central Valley spring-run chinook, Oncorhynchus tsha4scha (T) NMFS
Sacramento splittail, Pogonichthys macrolepidafus A
lnvertebrates
mission blue bullerfly, lcarbia icanbrdes missionensis (E)
San Bruno elfin butterfly, lncisalia mossii bayensis (E)
Plants
San Mateo thornmint, Acanthomintha duftonii (E) ,
fountain thistle, Cirsium fontinale var. fontinale (E)
San Mateo woolly sunflower, Eiophyllum latibbum (E)
Marin dwarf-flax (=westem flax), Hespetolinon curgesfum Cf)
white-rayed pentachaeta, Pentachaeta befiidiflora (E) .
Candidate Species
Fish
Cenhd Valley full/late fall{un chinook sa,mon, Oncorhynchus tsha}tyrscna (C) NMFS
Critical habitat, Central Valley falulate fall-run chinook, Oncorhlu,.r,chus tshawytscha (C) NMFS
Species of Concera
Mammals
Pacific western big,-eated bal, Corynothinus (--pledus) townsendiirolvnserdrl (SC)
greater western mastifftat, Eumops perotris caiTomicus (SC)
long-eared myotis bat, Myofils evotrs (SC)
fringed myotis bat, Myotls ,r,ysanodes (SC)
long-legged myotis bat, Myotis vorars (SC)
Reference File No. 1-142-SP-274r'.
Yuma myotis bat, Myotis yumanensis (SC)
San Francisco dusky-footed woodral, Neotoma fuscipes arnecrens (SC)
salt marsh vagrant shrew, SorBx yagrars lralicoeres (SC)
Bhds
tricolored blackbird, Agelaius lncolor (SC)
grasshopper spano\^t, Ammodramus savannarum (SC)
Bell's sage spanow, Amphispiza be i Delr, (SC)
short-eared owl, Asio flammeus (SC)
western bunowing o^ti, Athene cuniculaia hypugaea (SC)
fenuginous hawk, Euteo /egaris (SC)
Costra's hummingbhd, Calypre costae (SC)
Lawrence's goldfinch, Caduelis lawrencei (SC)
Vaux's swift, Chaetura vauxi (SQ)
black tem, Chf?onias nrger (SC)
black swifl, Cypselordes nrger (SC)
hermit warbler, Dendroica occidentalis (SCl
white-talled (=black shouldered) kite, E/arus /eucurus (SC)
little willow flycatchet, Empidonax traillii brewstei (CAl
American peregrine falcon, Falco Wreginus anatum (O)
saltrnarsh common yellowthroat, Geoth/ryr,is tichas sinuosa (SC)
loggerhead shrike, Lanius ludovicianus (SC)
black rail, Laterallus jamabensis cotumiculus (CA)
Lewis' woodp€cket, Melanerpes lewis (SC)
Alameda (South Bay) song spanoit, Mebspiza metodia pusi ula (SC)
long-bifled curlew, Numenius ameicanus (SC)
bank swallow, Riparia ripaia (CA)
rufous hummingbird, Se/asphorus rufus (SC)
Allen's hummingbhd, Serasphorus sasin (SC)
Reptiles
northweslorn pond turtle, Cbmmys marmorata marmorata (SC)
soulhwestem pond turfle, Cremrnys mamorata pa ida (s.C)
Califomia horned lizard, Phryndsoma coronatum hontate (SC)
Amphibians
foothill yellow-legged frog, Rana Doyrii (SC)
Fish
longfin smelt, Spiinchus thalebhrrys (SC)
Page 6
Reference File No. 1-1-02-SP-2744
KEY:
lnvertebrates
Edgewood blind harvestman, Calicina minor (SC|
Ricksecke/s water scavenger beetle, Hydrochara ickseckeri (SC)
Plants
Franciscan onion, Allium peninsulare var. fnnciscanum (SLC)
bent-flowered fiddleneck, Amsirck a /unaris (SLC)
Santa Cruz manzanila, Arctoslaphylos andersonT (SLC)
saft marsh owl's clover (=johnny-nip\, Castilleja ambigua ssp. ambrgua (SLC)
San Francisco Bay spineflo^rer, Choizanthe cuspidata var, cuspidata (SC)
northcoast (=Point Reyes) bird's-beak, Cordylanthus marifimus ssp. palusrnis (SC) *
Hillsborough chocolate lily (= Gray's fritillary), Fitillaria biflon var ineziana (--F. grayana) (SC)
fragrant fiitillary (= prairie bells), Fritillarla liliacea (SC)
Crystal Sprlngs lessingia, Lessingrb anchnoidea (SC')
coast lily, Ulium maritimum (SC) '
San Mateo tree lupin6, Lupinus arborcus var. exrinclus (SLC)
arcuate bush mallo,v, Malacothamnus arurtafus (--M. fascicuraf) (SLC)
Paciric cordgrass (=California cordgrass), Spanha forbsa (SLC)
water sack (=saline) clover, Trifolim depauperatum var, hydrophilum (SC)
Page 7
Listed (in the Federal Register) as being in danger of extinction.
Listed as likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future.
Officially proposed (in the Federal Register) for listing as endangered or threalened.
Proposed as an area essential to the conservation of the species.
Candidate to become a proposed species.
May bo endangered or lhrealened. Not enough biological information has been
gathered to support listing at this time.
Species of local or regional concern or conservation signiticance.
Migratory bhd
Under lhe jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Contacl them direcfly.
Delisted. Status to be monitored for 5 years.
Listed as threatened or endangered by the Strate of Calffomia.
Possibly extirpated ftom this quad.
Possib,y extinct.
Area essential to the conservation of a species.
(E)
(r)
(P)
(Px)
(c)
(sc)
(sLc)
(MB)
NMFS
(D)
(cA)
(')
(*)
Endangered
Threatened
Proposed
Proposed
Critical Habilat
Candidate
Specrbs of
Concern
Specrbs of
Local Concem
Migratory Bird
NMFS species
Delisted
State-L,3red
Ertiryated
Ertinct
Critical Habitat
07/zs/zaoz 14:53 FAI 935 950 0Z0E
, t7/2Y2oa2 13:31 51'g?327752
CA80LL0 en8lneerB
DON BPI-LAI.ITI
16 002
PAEE g?
Donald Bal}anti
C erttied Consu lting lvteteor alogist
July 29, 2t102
Ridt Ctun
Carollo Engineers
2700 Ygnacio Valley Rd # 300
WElnut Cted( CA 94588
SubJect Federql General Confonnity Analysis for the Crty of Burlingame Wactewetcr
Treatnpnt FaoiliV lmprovementg Praject
Dear Mr, Chan:
It iE rny under:standing that the subjed projed tunding rours mry lndude the $tett
Revolving Loan Fund. Since this progrsm is pailielly funded by tho U. S.
Environmental Proteetion Agency, tho piojoct lr/orlld be su{ect b the conlbrmity
requirernente of the Clean AirAA Amendments. The conformlty proviaiona of he Act
are detbned to ensure that fuderal agencies contribute to, instead of jeopardizing,
efforts to achieve the NationalAmbient Air Qualrty $tandardc.
The Genaral Contormity rules require confornity deErminatione for proioets lf they
generato more erniscionc than rninirnum thrgholds and are not specifuslly exernpted
by the rogulation. The Bay Area b currently a federal nonatteinmont eroa fur ozon€,
and the General Confonnity rules establish fre following "de rninimis'threrholds:
100 tons per year for VOCs
100 tone per year for Nox
The City of Burlingame lA/agteurater Treatnent Facitity ls a atatlonary source of slr
pollu(ents operating under a perrnit from the Bay Area Air Quality lfanagoment Dlstrlct
(BAAAMD). Cunent annual emlsslons of ozone pracureors Readivc Organic Geess
(ROG1 aFd Nitrogen Orides (NOx) from this facility are shown in Tablcl.
The projecl wou6 not inoreaee overall wastewater trsatmont capacity and tfiua wouts
not change statlonary emiccione. Howevsr, during the construciion of lhe projed
additionel emlesione wouH be generated by oongtruction equipment and vetricbo. The
URBEMISTG emissions progfamB yvas used to calcr.rlatp air erniscione fom the
dernotlion of existlng s!rus{ures and oonsttcilon of new buildingr, Emicsions
associatEd wi$t pilsdriving r,torc calculatcd separately assumlrg r:ss of a pilsdriver
and crane for a period of 2 months ueing erniecions factors, bad faotom and anglnc
Air Pollution Meteorolog!, . Dispersion Modeling r Q1;6stologicalAnalirsis
' L424 Scott Street
El Cerrito, Ca.9{Xt0
(510) 23/.4tr7
Fax; (510) 232-7752
a7/29/20A2 1l;S{ FAX 925 030 0l0E
,V7t?9l2ga2 13:31 5182327752
Rick Chan
July 29, 20Oz
Page 2
CARoLLo enSlDeer8
DO'l BA_LANTI
@ oor
PA6E E3
horseporer e8limates dovetoped by the South Comt Air euality MrnagernentDistrict-t consbuction rmc assirmed io be compbted wiitrin i r-i""iirloo. Annuatgmbsbns fom construcfion sc{ivitieg are shorn in rauu'I.
Operatlonel and coretruction ernissions_areindfuHually and cumulatively subcbntiallybelow the 'do minimb" thresholde for ozonc prpcursira establishJ 6i'triJ ,"gion bythe Fedcrrl Claan AirAct mnformity rules. fne prop*ud proiocl woutO nA infrtr"with attsinment of the NstionalAmbient eir ouailti'5[rna"ni. ino 'rvouto not- raqule goonformity determ inetion.
Pleese callif you have any queotions regardhg thb anarysis.
Ballanti
Certified Consulting Meteorologist
Attachmento
t Soudr CoastAir Quallty Managemefi Diefiict, CEQA AirQuatity Hendbook,Apfit 1993.
07i29/Z0oZ 1{:54 F&I 825 930 (r?oE
, a?t2V28A2 l3:31 510?327732
CAROLLO englneers
DON BA-LANTI
@ ooa
PAGE A4
Tsble 1: Annual Operationaland Corctruction Emleslonr, in Tons PerYoar
' Bay Area Air Quality Menagement Dishlct, Rsvlsed San Franclsco Bay y'uura Ozone
Attainment Ptan farthe |-Hour Natlonel ozorp sfandard, odober 200i.
ROG NOr
Operetion 15.7 tonsrYear 1.2 tonsryegr
Construction 1.14 tonsryeer 8.51 tons/year
Ds Minimb Threshold 100 tona&ear 100 tone{par
Regional Emiesionr
lnventorf
168.5 tons/day 109.3 tonsldey'
2
2
2
Table of Contents
Inkoduction......
References........
Applicant/Contact Person
Project Location and Context.......
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance.. ...........................35
Initial Study Pre pare rs.. .... . ....
Agencies and Organizations Consulted
.37
.37
City of Burlingame
Environmental ChecklisU
Initial Study
Introduction
This Initial Study has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts of
implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed
environmental checklist and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the
checklist.
ApplicanUContact Person
City of Burlingame
Public Works Department
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame CA 94010
Attn: George Bagdon, P.E., Director of Public Works
Project Location and Context
The project is sited in the eastern portion of Burlingame within San Mateo County. The proposed
project includes upgrades and construction of new facilities at the City of Burlingame
Wastewater Treatment Facility. The facility is located on the west side of Airport Boulevard at
1 103 Airport Boulevard.
Exhibit 1 depicts the regional setting of Burlingame and Exhibit 2 shows the location of the
project in context with nearby major streets and highways, San Francisco Bay and other features.
Land uses near the project site includes public parks and open spaces to the north, west and
south. To the east, across South Airport Boulevard, is San Francisco Bay.
Project Description
Project history and background
The Wastewater Treatment Plant was originally built on this site in the 1930's and serves all the
incorporated City of Burlingame, unincorporated lands near Burlingame and portions of the
Town of Hillsborough. The facility treats wastewater from all residential, commercial, industrial,
institutional and other land uses in the City. Disposal of treated effluent is handled by the North
Bayside System Unit, which is the joint powers authority consisting of several local communiries
for disposal of treated effluent into San Francisco Bay.
Proposed improv ements
The proposed project is being undertaken to
Replace older and out-of-date components of the facility, including but not limited to the
replacement of the existing sludge dewatering building, update the aeration system,
Page 2
June 2002
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
o
. update electrical components within the existing control room, replace a drain pump and
pipeline between the two primary clarifier tanks, modifications to an existing flare stack,
and minor interior modification to the headworks portion of the facility.
' Construction of new minor facilities, including a new drain pump station, electrical
building and truck unloading building.
The proposed project is not intended to increase the overall wastewater treatment and/or disposal
capacity of the City's wastewater treatment facility. The existing dry weather treatment capacity
of the facility is 5.5 mgd (million of gallons per day). The facility is presently operaring at a
capacity of 4.1 mgd.
Theexisting allocated effluent peak flow pump capacity of the plant is limited to l6 mgd as a
result of the joint powers agreement with the North Bayside System Unit dischargers.
Upgraded components
An expanded discussion of the facility elements to be upgraded include:
' Th. existing metal sludge dewatering building consisting of approximately 8,000 square
feet is proposed to be replaced in approximately the same site within the facility. The new
dewatering facility would have a square footage of approximately 6,400 square feet. The
purpose of the sludge dewatering building is to reduce a significant fraction of the water
entrained in the sewage solids collected by the facility in preparation for environmentally
acceptable disposal off-site (item #l on Exhibit 3).
' fh. existing aeration system was installed in the 1979 treatment facility upgrade and no
longer provide the desired system reliability and operating efficiency. A new aeration
system is proposed within the aeration tanks (see #3 on Exhibit 3).
Existing older blowers and interior electrical panels and controls within the main
equipment room are proposed to be upgraded to improve the supply of air to the new
leration system and other facilities included within the overall faciiity upgrade (see #4 on
Exhibit 3).
A temporary pump and pipe installation between the two primary clarifier basins is
proposed to be replaced with a permanent installation. This system is used to balance
flows during the normal operating day to reduce the impacts of peak wet weather flows
on the entire facility (see #5 on Exhibit 3).
a
a The existing flare stack, used to burn off excess methane is proposed to be modified to
replaced as the existing stack has reached the end of its design life (see #6 on Exhibit 3).
Minor modifications are proposed to the facility headworks that accepts inflow of
untreated sewage into the facility. Proposed work will modify the structure to better
contain and treat the normally occurring odorous gases. No increase in the capacity of the
headworks is planned (see #7 on Exhibit 3).
City of Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 3
June 2002
a
New construction
A second portion of the project includes construction of new facilities not currently a part of the
facility. A summary of these improvements include:
Construction of a new station to accommodate upgraded pumps feeding the sludge
dewatering building. Two existing pumps presently exist at ground level within the
facility, however, to improve efficiency, new pumps will be housed in a new structure of
approximately 530 square feet. New pumps will be located below existing grade surface
(see #2 on Exhibit 3).
a
A new 240 square foot electrical control room is proposed to be built behind the settling
basins to house new pump controls. This site has been selected to the close proximity of
an existing underground electrical line (see # 9 on Exhibit 3).
A new vacuum ruck unloading station building is proposed to be constructed on the west
side of the facility, consisting of 625 square feet. This building is intended to provide an
improved location for City sewer clean-out trucks to deposit material taken from sewer
lines as part of regular maintenance. Presently, this material is unloaded in the open air,
resulting in unacceptable odors and operational inefficiencies (see item #10 on Exhibit 3)
If approved, the above improvements would be constructed starting in Fall, 2A02.
Proposedfunding
Funding of the above improvements is proposed to be through the California State Water
Resources Control Board's State Revolving Fund Loan.
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewate r Treatment Fac i I ity I mprovement Proj ect
Page 4
June 2002
Son Rofoel !
DoV CIV
Poclfico
Rlchmond
Berkeley
o Ookbnd
Bruno
urlingo
PoloAlto O
lrlountdnView
O Sr. Leondro
j l'lofrutord
o
Son o
O
o
Son Msteo j Fremont
Redwood CltyO
A o
Sunr[^/ole O
Son Joseo
Exhibi t 1-Regional Location
Initial sludylwastewater Treatment Facility Improvement programCifv nf Rrrrlinoarne
May 2002
-!
-
-
-
v,
IP
San Francisco Bay
Project Site
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
Exhibit 2-Site Location
Initial_Study/Wastewater Treatment Facitity Improvement program
City of Burlingame
mEEk cfr^
AIRPORT BL\O
t
I
I
May 2002
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\+
ct J)
NOIE t
-
v
Legend
1 Sludge Dewatering Building2 Sludge Dewatering Feed pump Station3 Aeration Basin Modification4 Equipment Room Modification5 Primary Clarifier6 Flare Stack Modifications7 HeadworksModifications
8 Unloading Station9 Electrical Building
10 Drain Water pump Station
v
9"2;g | "=40,'
o
itolE 1
I
E]
x
x
t
Asrr e[]
x
o
2
\
i1
City of Burlingame
Treatment Facility Improvement Program
20(l2
Exh ibit 3-Site Plan
Initial StudY/Wastewater
o ooo
E
t
Ir
I---.rllii! rr
L-j
1. Project description:
2.Lead, agency:
3. Contact person:
4. Project location:
Improvements to the City of Burlingame Wastewater
Treatment Facility to include construction of three new
small buildings on the existing site and the upgrading and
modernization of other facilities. Total new building square
footage is approximately 7 ,265 square feet.
City of Burlingame
Public Works Department
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame CA 94010
George Bagdon, P.E., Director of Public Works
(6s0) ss8-7230
Generally located on the west side of Airport Boulevard
south of the intersection of Aiqport Boulevard and
Broadway (l 103 Airport Boulevard, Burlingame)
Approval of Negative Declaration (City of Burlingame)
Approval of Improvement Plans (City of Burlingame)
Permit for modified flare stack (Bay Area Air euarity Management
District)
5. Project sponsor:City of Burlingame
6. General Plan designation: community park/Sewage Disposal
7. Zoning:Unclassified
8. Public agency required approvals:
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Page 8
June 2002Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agricultural
Resources
x Air Quality
Biological Resources x Cultural Resources Geology/Soils
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
x Hydrology/TVater
Quality
Land Use/ Planning
Mineral Resources Noise Population/
Housing
Public Services Recreation Transportation/
Circulation
Utilities/Service
Systems
Mandatory Findings
of Significance
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewate r Treatment Facil ity I mprovement Project
Page 9
June 2002
Determination (to be completed by Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
-
I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and
the previous Negative Declaration certified for this project by the City of Burlingame
adequately addresses potential impacts.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Negative Declaration will be
prepared.
-
I find that although the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment,
but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier
analysis as described on the attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated." An Environmental Impact Report is required, but
must only analyze the effects that remain to be addressed.
-
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed on the proposed project.
Signature:Glvll,u
Printed Name or:o{ 6*
City ol Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mprovement Project
Page 10
June 2002
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "no impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parenthesis
following each question. A "no impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one
involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "no impact" answer should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general factors (e.g. the
project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2) Al1 answers must take account of the whole action, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect
is significant. If there are one or more "potentially significant impact" entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Less Than Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" implies the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "potentially significant effect" to a "less
than significant impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
City of Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 1 1
June 2002
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Environmental Impacts (Note: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing
of sources used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist)
Note: A full discussion of each item is found
following the checklist.
1.. Aesthetics. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic
vista? (Source: 4)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including but not limited to trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway? (Source: 4)
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings? (Source: 4)
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? (Source: 4)
2. Agricultural Resources
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or
Farmland of Statewide Importance, as
showing on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the Califomia Resources
Agency, to a non-agriculrural use? (Source:
1,4)
b) Conflict with existingzoning for agriculture
use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Source:
I,4)
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
farmland to a non-agricultural use? (Source:
r,4)
3. Air Quality (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air
quality management district may be relied
on to make the following determinations).
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan? (Source:1,4)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation? (Source: 1,4 )
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitisation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
X
X
X
x
x
X
City of Burlingame
I nitial Study/Wastewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 12
June 2002
-
-
E
!.
-
E
-
!
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors? (1, 7)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? (Source:4)
e) Create objectionable odors? (Source: 3)
4. Biological Resources.Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Source:4)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies or regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source:
4)
c) Have a substantial adverse impact on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 4M of the Clean Water Act
(including but not limited to marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological intemrption or other
means?
(Source:4)
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? (Source: 4)
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as tree
protection ordinances? (Source: 4)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
wirh
Mitisation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
City of Burlingame
I nitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 13
June 2002
0 Conflict with the provision of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan or other
approved local, regional or state habitat
conservation plan? (Source: 4)
5. Cultural Resources. Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in Sec. t50645? (Source: 6)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource
pursuant to Sec. 15064.5 (Source:S)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or unique geologic
feature? (Source: 5)
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of a formal cemetery?
(Source: 5)
6. Geology and Soils. Would the project
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist or based on other known evidence
of a known fault (Source: 1)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (l)
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? (1)
iv) Landslides? (1,4)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? (4)
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project and potentially result in
on- and off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or similar hazards
(Source: l)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 13-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property? (Source: 1, 3)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitieation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
x
x
x
x
X
x
X
x
x
X
x
City of Burlingame
I nitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mprovement Project
Page 14
June 2002
I
:
I
i
F
e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste?
(Source: 3)
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials.Would the
project:
a) Create a significanthazud to the public or the
environment through the routine transport,
use or disposal of hazardous materials
(Source:4)
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous into the environment?
(Source:4)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school? (Source: 3,4)
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites complied
pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65962.5
and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
(Source: 4)
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such plan has not been
adopted, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area? (Source: 4)
f) For a project within the vicinity of private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area? (Source: 4)
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with the adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? (Source:4)
l
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitieation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
:
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 15
June 2002
h) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands
are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
(Source:4)
8. Hydrology and Water Quatity. Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements? (Source : 3, 4)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g. the
production rate of existing nearby wells
would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses
for which permis have been granted?
(Source: 2, 3)
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the aeration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site? (Source: 2,3)
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or areas, including through
the alteration of a course or stream or river,
or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off-site? (Source: 2)
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff? (Source: 2, 3)
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality? (Source: 3, 4)
g) Place housing within a 1O0-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a Flood Hazud Boundary
or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood
delineation map? (Source: 3)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitieation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
City ol Burlingame
I nitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 16
June 2002
L
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures which impede or redirect flood
flows? (Source: 3)
i) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury, and death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of
the failure of a levee or dam? (3)
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (2,
3)
9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
(Source: 1,4)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect? (Source: 1,4)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? (1)
10. Mineral Resources. Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
(Source: 1)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general Plan, specific
plan or other land use plan? (Source:1)
L1. Noise. Would the proposal result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in
the general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
(Source: 1,4)
b) Exposure ofpersons or to generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? (Source: 4)
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above
existing levels without the project? (Source:
1,2,4)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitieation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
lmpact
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
City of Burlingame
I nitial StudyAA/astewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 17
June 2002
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase
in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels without the project? (Source: 2)
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working n the
project area to excessive noise levels?
(Source: 1)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? (Source: 1,4)
12. Population and Housing. Would the project
a) Induce substantial population growth in an
area, either directly or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)? (Source: 7)
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? (7)
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the replacement of housing
elsewhere? (Source: 4)
13. Public Services. Would the proposal:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service rations, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services? (Sources: 1, 7)
Fire protection
Police protection
Schools
Parks
Other public facilities
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitieation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
X
X
x
x
X
x
x
x
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 18
June 2002
I
i
b
I
F
l
-
b
I
14. Recreation:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood or regional facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated
(Source:4)
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
(Source:4)
15. Transportation and Trafric. Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads or congestion at
intersections)? (1,4)
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a
level of service standard established by the
County Congestion Management Agency for
designated roads or highways? (3)
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels
or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks? (4)
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses, such as
farm equipment? (2)
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (2)
f1 Result in inadequate parking capacity? (2)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or
programs supporting alternative transportation
(such as bus turnouts and bicycle facilities)
(l)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
x
X
x
X
x
x
City of Burlingame
I n iti al StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mprovement Project
Page 19
June 2002
l
16. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the
project
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of
the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board? (3,4)
b) Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? (2)
c) Require or result in the construction of new
storrn water drainage facilities or expansion
of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
effects? (4)
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project from existing water
entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed? (4)
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the providers existing
commitments? (4)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs? (7)
g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste? (7)
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number of or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
City of Burlingame
I nitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility I mprovement Project
Page 20
June 2002
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects).
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts
1. Burlingame General Plan
2. Facility Improvement Plans
3. Discussion with City staff or service provider
4. Site visit
5. Holman & Associates archeological literature search
6. Carey & Co. historic resources report
7. Other source
XV[. Earlier Analyses
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Reference Section 1 5063 (cX3Xd).
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mprovement Project
Page 21
June 2002
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
Attachment to Initial Study
Discussion of Checklist
1. Aesthetics
Environmental Settins
The project site is located in the easterly portion of Burlingame and has been developed for a
number of years with the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility. As such, there are no scenic
resources on the site. The facility is surrounded by view obscuring fences and solid walls on all
sides.
Views of San Francisco Bay are available due east of the site.
b)Substantially damage scenic resources, including state scenic highway? NI. No changes
to scenic resources are proposed, since the proposed project elements would generally not
be visible from surrounding properties or rights-of-way. Airport Boulevard is not
identified as a state scenic highway Na impacts ue anticipated with regard to this topic.
c)Substantially degrade existing visunl character or the quality of the sire? NI. The project
area has been previously developed with the City's wastewater treatment facility.
Proposed construction would be included within the boundaries of the plant and would
blend in with existing facility design and colors. There would therefore be zo impacts to
the existing visual character or quality of the project site.
d)Create light or glare? NI. A number of light sources presently exist within the project
site. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on new
sources of light and glare, since limited new lighting would only be included for safety
and security purposes. Na impacts are anticipated with regard to light and glare.
2. Agriculfural Resources
Environmental Settins
The project site has been developed for a number of years with the City's wastewater treatment
facility. Although underlying soils may support agriculture, no crops have not been cultivated in
many years nor have any portions of the project area been used for animal grazing. No
The Plant contains a number of exterior lights, since operations are on a 24-hour basis and lights
are required for both worker safety and security.
Project Impactsa) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic yrsra? NI. The proposed project includes
minor expansions and upgrades to existing facilities at the WWTP. Several project
components include upgrades to facilities that would not be visible off of the project site,
such as electrical system upgrades and a new aeration system. Proposed new construction
would generally not be visible from surrounding properties or from Airport Boulevard,
since the facility is screened by a view obscuring fence. ly'o impacts or changes to scenic
vistas would occur should the proposal be implemented.
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyflVastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 22
June 2002
Williamson Act conservation agreements have been signed for properties affected by this
project, since the great majority of the land is owned by public agencies. No agricultural zoning
had been adopted for any portion of the project area by the City of Burlingame.
Project Impacts
a-c) Convert Prime Farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning or agriculture Land use or
convert prime farmland to a non-agicultural zsa ? M. The project site lies in a highly
urbanized arca of Burlingame and there would be no impact with regard to agricultural
uses, agricultural zoning or Williamson Act agreements.
3. Air Quality
Environmental Setting
South San Francisco lies in the Bay Area's peninsula climatological subregion, which extends
from northwest San Jose to the Golden Gate. The Santa Cruz Mountains extend up the center of
the peninsula, with elevations exceeding 200 feet above sea level at the southerly end ofthe
basin and decreasing to approximately 500 near South San Francisco. The San Bruno Gap in the
mountain system extends from Fort Funston on the ocean to the San Francisco Intemational
Airport. Because the gap is oriented in the same direction as prevailing winds, marine air flows
easily in the direction of San Francisco Bay.
Average annual wind speeds range from five to ten miles per hour and often carry air pollutants
from Burlingame to the east before they can accumulate. In general, air quality in the
Burlingame area is satisfactory with few exceedances of either State or federal air quality
standards
Proiect ImDacts
a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? NI. The
proposed project would not conflict with the local Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area
Air Quality Management District, since no development would occur that would generate
either additional auto trips or land uses that would result in greater automobile trips.
Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the treatment capacity of the
Facility to induce or allow additional residential or non-residential growth in Burlingame. above that cunently allowed. No impacts arc therefore anticipated. Since none of the
proposed facility improvements would indirectly induce additional population or
employment growth, no impacts would result regarding secondary impacts as well.
b) Would the project violate any air quality standards? LS/l\{. Construction proposed
improvements would involve grading and excavation for utility trenching, building
foundations and related activities. Unless proper measures are undertaken to minimize air
bome pollutants, potentially significant impacts may result with regard to short-term
construction air emissions. The following measure is recommended to reduce this potential
impact to a less-than-significant level:
Mitigation Measure 1. The project contractor shall adhere to appropriate methods
recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to minimize air borne
pollution, including but not limited to frequent watering of open trenches, covering of
City oi Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatmenl Facility lmprovement Project
Page 23
June 2002
excavated dirt and related actions. Dust control measures shall be included on
contractor project specifications.
c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? NI. The proposed
project includes minor improvements and upgrades tot he Facility to improve operations.
The project would not involve increasing the treatment capacity or operations of the
Facility that would generate air pollutants within the larger air basin. No impacts arc
therefore anticipated with regard to cumulative air quality impacts.
d,e) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations or create objectionable
odors? Nl. Complaints have been received in the past from users ofthe City park
surrounding the facility on three sides. One of the project components would be to enclose
the sewer vacuum truck unloading area, curently done in an open air location, within a
permanent building with an odor control system. The proposed building would reduce
emission of odors of sewer vacuum truck unloading noticeable from surrounding
properties, There would therefore be no impact with rcgard to future odors.
4. Biological Resources
Environmental Settins
The project site has been completely developed with Plant facilities or has been paved to provide
full access to all of the equipment and facilities on the site. Therefore, no native vegetation is
found on the site and the site is not habitat for any animal species.
Since the site is fully developed with structures or paving, no wetlands or other waters of the
United States are found.
Proiect Imoacts
a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a candidate, sensitive, or speciol-status species?
NI. No changes to existing development pattems or are proposed as part of this project,
so that rro impacts are anticipated with regard to candidate, sensitive or endangered
species or their respective habitats.
b, c) Have a substantial adverse impact on riparian habitat or federally protected wetlands ?
NI. No wetlands or other waters of the United States have been observed on the project
site, so ,to impacts wotid result with regard to this topic.
d)Interfere with movement of native fish or wildlife species? NI. The project site is fenced
to minimize public access. This fencing would preclude movement of animals through
the site. Since no construction is proposed in or neat any body of water, movement of fish
species would not be blocked. No impacts wolTd therefore occur with regarding to
interference with movement of fish or animals.
City of Burlingame
lnitial Sludy/Wastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 24
June 2002
Since one of the project elements includes installation of a new flare stack to bum off
excess methane gas, approvals from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District must
be obtained.
e, 0 Conflict with local polictes or ordinances protecting biological resources or any adopted
Habitat Conservation Plans or Ndtural Community Conservation Plans? NI. The site is
not located within the boundaries of any Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural
Community Conservation Plan. Na impacts wo]uld therefore result.
5. Cultural Resources
Environmental Settins
Archeology
An archeological literature search for the proposed project was conducted in 2001 by Holman &
Associates, archeological consultants. The review was conducted to meet Section 106 standards
of the National Historical Preservation Act to obtain archeological information regarding
recorded archeological sites in and around the project area and any information regarding
previous archeological reports which may have covered the project area.
Based on the letter prepared by Miley Holman of Holman & Associates (attached in the
Appendix), indicates there are no recorded prehistoric or historic sites inside or within one-
quarter mile of the project area. The 1899 USGS topo$aphic map of the area shows the project
site was then part of San Francisco Bay.
There has been one archeological survey of the entire project site which failed to uncover either
historic or prehistoric archeological materials. In 1980, David Chavez reported on the findings of
a survey entitled Cultural Resources EvaJuation for the Airport Boulevard Widening Project.
Burlingame California- which covered a much larger area surrounding the treatment facility.
A check has also been made with the Native American Heritage Commission concerning a
review of Sacred Lands File. Nothing was identified in this file and a recommendation was made
to contact knowledgeable Native American informants. Of &en ten letters written, only one
response was received with no information to share regarding Native American uses of the
general area.
Historic resources
A review of architectural historical resources on and adjacent to the project site was recently
conducted by Carey & Co. consistent with the requirements of Section 106 of the National
Historical Preservation Act. Their report is found in an Appendix of this Initial Study.
Proiect lmoacts
a) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic resources? NI. Based on the
historical search prepared by Carcy & Co., no historical resources were identified within
an Area of Potential Effect as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the
California Register of Historical Resources. This is based on a site visit, review of
appropriate archival data and consultation with local agencies. No impacts are therefore
anticipated with regard to significant historical resources.
City ot Burlingame
lnitial SludyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Copies of the Holman & Associates letter and related conespondence is contained in an
appendix to this Initial Study.
Page 25
June 2002
b-d) Cause a substantial adverse impact or destruction to archeological or paleontological
resources or human remains2l-5. Based on a literature of the site prepared by Holman &
Associates, no such archeological, paleontological, Native American tesources or human
remains are present on the project site, and a less-than-significan, impact would result' In
the remote possibility that such resources are encountered during project construction the
following mitigation measure is recommended.
Mitigation Measure 2: All future development projects within the project area-shall
be evaluated as part of normal CEQA-level review to identify potential impacts to
subsurface archeological, Native American or paleontological artifacts. If such an
artifact is identified, work on the project shall cease until a resource protection plan
conforming to CEQA Section 15064.5 is prepared by a qualified archeologist and/or
paleontologist and approved by the Burlingame Planning Director. Project work may
be resumed in compliance with such plan. If human remains are encountered, the
County Coroner shall be contacted immediately.
6. Geology and Soils
Environmental Setting
The project site is located within a relatively flat site on the western side of San Francisco Bay.
The Seismic Safety Element of the Burlingame General Plan identifies the soil type underlying
the site as artificial fill over Bay mud. The Element does not identify any earthquake faults as
being present on the project site (see Plate I of the Seismic Safety Element).
There are no significant geologic features on the site.
Plate 3 of the Seismic Safety Element identify the project site as having a minimal risk of
landslide.
Project Impacts
a) Expose people or structures to potential substdntial adverse impacts, includ.ing loss,
injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, or
Landslides'! LS. The area is subject to ground shaking caused by a number of regional
faults including the San Andreas fault and Serra fault, both located west of the project
site. Under moderate to severe seismic events which are probable in the Bay Area over
the next 30 years, existing structures and other improvements constructed on the site
would be subject to damage caused by ground shaking. According to City staff, structures
and other improvements to be undertaken on the site as part of the project are to be
designed to withstand anticipated future seismic events in the region. Less-than-
significant impacts are therefore anticipated with regard to groundshaking.
Since no known faults are located under the site, no impacts are anticipated with regard to
ground rupture. Similarly, no impacts are anticipated with regard to landslide, since the
site is generally flat.
b) Is the site subject to substantial erosion and/or the loss of topsoil? LS. Less-than-
significant impacts are anticipated with regard to soil erosion or loss of topsoil should the
proposed project be approved. This is based on the limited amount of excavation required
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 26
June 2002
to accommodate proposed improvements such as the truck unlading building, new pump
station building, electrical building and the teplacement sludge dewatering building.
c-d) Is the site located on soil that is unstable or expansive or result in potential lateral
spreading, Iiquefaction, landslide or collapse? LS. The Seismic Safety Element of the
General Plan identifies that the project site is located on artificial fill over Bay mud.
Typically, fill material is more susceptible to liquefaction and lateral spreading that
naturally occurring soil types Less-than-signiftcant impacts are therefore anticipated with
regard to these impacts. No impacts are anticipated with regard to landslides, since the
area is generally flat.
e)Have soils incapable of supporting on-site septic tanks if sewers are not available'! NI.
The proposed project includes improvements to the City of Burlingame Wastewater
Treatment Facility and does not involve septic tank use. No impacts arc therefore
anticipated.
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Environmental Setting
The Safety Element of the General Plan identifies the following potential hazards within
Burlingame: fire, flooding, water supply and sewage disposal, geological hazards and other
disasters, such as train derailments, downed power lines, plane crashes, fuel spills and fallen
trees.
Geological hazards have been discussed in the previous section of this Initial Study. Potential
sewage disposal hazards include the older portions of the City's sewage collection system rather
than the wastewater treatment plant itself.
d) Is the site listed as a hazardous materials site? Nl. The project area is not listed as a
hazardous materials site, so there wouldbe no impacts in this regard.
e,f) Is the site located within an airport land. use plan of a public airport or private airstrip?
NI. The project area is located south and east of San Francisco Intemational Airport but is
not located under a fight path or within an airport safety or hazard zone. No impacts arc
therefore anticipated regarding airport safety issues.
g) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan? NL The proposed project would not
involve any change to existing roads or development patterns. Therefore, no impacts are
anticipated with regard to interference with emergency evacuation plans.
City of Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 27
June 2002
Proiect Imoacts
a-c) Create a significant haTard through transport of hazardous materials or release or
emission of hazardous materials? Nl. The proposed project would involve minor
construction and upgrades to the facility. No additional use of hazardous materials would
be involved, nor would there be any increase in transportation of such materials as part of
this project. No impacts are anticipated with regard to creating any new hazards or release
of hazardous materials.
h) Expose people and structures to d siSnifica t risk of loss, iniury or death involving
wild.land fires or where residences are intennked with widlands'! Nl. The project area lies
in a substantially urbanized area with minimal risk of wildland fircs. No impacts Ne
therefore anticipated.
8. Hydrology and Water Quality
Environmental Setting
The City of Burlingame lies on the westem edge of San Francisco Bay. Stormwater drainage is
transported via a series of open channels ard underground pipes into the Bay'
No wetlands have been observed on the site and the site is not located within a 100-year flood
plain, based on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM), which covers the City of Burlingame (FIRM Map 06501 CP#0002C, September 1981).
Proiert Imoacts
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? NI. Approval of the
proposed project would allow for minor upgrades and improvements to the Wastewater
Treatment Facility and would not increase wastewater discharges, exceed discharge
requirements or violate water quality standards. No impacts ue therefore anticipated with
regard to these topics.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater recharge areas or lowering ofwater table? Nl. The
proposed project would not involve significant use of water that could deplete the
groundwater basin. No impacts would occur. Similarly, zo impacts are anticipated with
regard to overcovering groundwater recharge areas since the project site is largely paved.
c)Substantially alter drainage patterns, including streambed courses such that substantial
siltation or erosion would occur? N[ No stream courses or other bodies of water exist on
the site that could be affected by implementation of the proposed projecl. No impacts
would occur. Similarly, since the project site is substantially paved, no changes would
occur with regard to current drainage pattems.
d)Substantially alter drainage pattems or result in flooding, either on or offthe project site''l
Nl. No impacts or changes to drainage patterns are anticipated since no change to existing
development pattems are proposed.
e) Create stormwater runoff that would exceed the capacity of drainage systems or add
substantial amounts of polluted runoi? NI. No increases in the quantity, direction or
velocity of existing drainage pattems e proposod as part of the project since the amount
of paved surfaces would not change. No impacts wouldtherefore result with regard to
drainage systems.
f1 Substantially degrade water quality'lLS. No changes to drainage patterns are proposed as
part of the project that could result in degradation of surface water quality. Stockpiling of
excavation and trcnch spoils could erode from the site, resulting in water quality
degradation. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 1 would reduce this potential impact to a
le s s - t han - s i g nifi c ant lev el.
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatmenl Facility lmprovemenl Project
Page 28
June 2002
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped by a Flood Insurdnce Rate
Map? Nl. There would therefore be no impacts with regard to flooding since the proposed
project does not include construction of housing.
h, i) Place within a 100-year flood hazard boundary structures that impeded or redirect flood
flow, including dam failures'! NI. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood
plain so none of the proposed construction would displace, redirect or impede flood waters
on or near the site. No impacts would therefore result.
9. Land Use and Planning
Environmental Settins
Regulatory frarnework
The existing City of Burlingame General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as
"Community Park" with the designation of "S (Sewage Disposal)" denoting the specific location
of the Wastewater Treatment Facility.
The City's Zoning Map indicate that the project site and sunounding properties are
"unclassified" in terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance. No zoning districts have been applied to the
Wastewater Treatment Facility by the City.
The Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan shows the project site as Anza Area Extension with
future land uses designated as "Public Open Space."
On-site land use
The project site has been developed with the Wastewater Treatment Facility and has been fenced
and gated to prohibit access by the general public.
Surrounding land uses
Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map, a community park has been developed on the
north, south and west sides of the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Recreational uses developed
within the park include ball fields, a dog run and passive open space areas. The previous use of
surrounding lands was as a sanitary landfill, since closed.
City ol Burlingame
lnitial StudyMaslewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
j) Result in inundation by seiche, tsunarni or mudflows'! l-5. The site is located near San
Francisco Bay and could be subject to tsunami action; however, this is anticipated to be
less-than-signfficant dlue lo the minor nature of proposed improvements to the facility.
Since surrounding properties are generally flat (although the site to the south is somewhat
elevated from the grade of the facility), the risk from mudflow appears less-than-' significant.
Proiect ImDacts
a) Physically divide an established community1 Nl. The entire project would take place within
the bounds of the Wastewater Treatment Facility and would have no impact on the
surrounding established community.
Page 29
June 2002
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or reguLation? NI. Use of the property
for a sewage disposal site is not proposed for change. Minor improvements and upgrades
would occur at the facility. No impacts would therefore result.
c) Conflict wtth a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? NI. No
such plan has been adopted within the City of Burlingame. There would therefore be no
impact to a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan for the
proposed project.
L0. Mineral Resources
Environmental Setting
The project site is nearly fully paved and contains no known minerals.
Proiect Imoacts
a,b) Result in the loss of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources? Nl.
Since only minor excavation is proposed in underlying Bay mud under the site as part of
the proposed project, no impacts are anticipated with regard to mineral resources.
1L. Noise
Envlronmental Setting
Major sources of noise on and adjacent to the project area include aircraft noise from San
Francisco International Airport, vehicular noise from the nearby U.S. 101 freeway, autos using
surface streets and noise generated by surrounding land uses.
On-going operation of the Wastewater Treatment Facility generates some amount of noise,
including noise generated by City trucks visiting the site and mechanical noise generated by
mechanical operation of the plant.
The Noise Element of the General Plan identifies maximum exterior noise exposure of 60
decibels on the CNEL scale as the maximum exterior noise exposure level for public, quasi-
public and residential land uses; a maximum exterior noise exposure level of 45 CNEL for
passive open spaces; a maximum exterior noise exposure level of 65 CNEL for commercial uses
and a maximum exterior noise exposure level of 75 CNEL for industrial uses.
Proiect Imoacts
a) Would the project expose persons or generate noise levels in excess of standards
established by the General Plan or other applicable standard? NI. No changes are
proposed to existing permanent noise levels, since no major changes to the operation of the
facility are proposed. Construction of the proposed truck unloading building would serve to
reduce noise to surrounding properties by shielding activities that presently occur in an
outdoor area of the facility. No impacts would therefore result.
b) Exposure of people to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? NL
Since no major development is anticipated as part of the proposed project, no sources of
City of Burlingame
I n iti al StudyMastewate r Treatment Facility I mprovement P roject
Page 30
June 2002
groundborne vibration or noise would be generated. There would therefore be no impacts
regarding this topic.
c) Substantial increases in permanent in ambient naise levels? NI. No permanent increases in
noise levels on the site would be generated by implementation of the proposed project. In
some instances, permanent noise levels would be reduced, since operations that presently
occur out-of-doors, such as the truck unloading station and sludge de-watering pumps,
would be located within an enclosed building to reduce noise levels on adjacent properties.
Other portions of the proposed project, such as aeration basin modifications, headworks
modifications and equipment room modifications, would have no effect on noise levels. No
impacts wottld therefore occur with respect to permanent noise level increases.
d) Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels without the project? LS. There would be temporary increases in noise on the
site during construction of the proposed improvements, including but not limited to heavy
equipment, concrete removal, compressors, trucks with back-up devices and similar noise.
Since there are no sensitive noise receptors in the immediate vicinity of the project site
(residences, schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, etc.) temporary construction noise
levels would be less-than-significont.
e, I For a project located within an airport land use plan, wouW the project expose people to
excessive notse levels? NI. The proposed project would not place people near an airport,
since none of the project elements include habitable structures. No impacts xe therefore
anticipated in terms of this topic.
12. Population and Housing
Environmental Settins
The Burlingame General Plan notes that the community was incorporated in 1908 with much of
its housing developed in the first half of the twentieth century. In more recent years, Burlingame
has matured as an employment and tourist-serving city. Development in Burlingame has been
facilitated by filling of Baylands east of theU.S. 101 freeway and the expansion of San
Francisco Intemational Airport.
Burlingame is an established, mature community, with minimal vacant or underutilized land left
for expansion. Population trends in the future anticipate small population increases.
Proiect ImDacts
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? NI. The
proposed project would not increase the wastewater treatment capacity of the plant that
could accommodate future growth in the community. Only minor improvements are
proposed to upgrade older, obsolete equipment and improve the efficiency of the facility
Since no increase in the treatment capacity of the plant would occur, there would be ro
impact ol increasing the population of Burlingame, either directly or indirectly.
b,c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people? Nl. All
work associated with the proposed project would occur at the Wastewater Treatment
City of Burlingame
lnilial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 31
June 2002
Facility and would displace neither existing housing units or people . No impacts with
regard to this issue would therefore occur.
13. Public Services
Environmental Setting
Fire protection: Fire protection is provided by the Burlingame Fire Department
which provides structural fire suppression and rescue services from three stations
within the community. Each station has an engine company staffed by a minimum
of three personnel each. One station has an additional fire company with an 105-ft.
aerial truck. The Department maintains mutual aid agleements with all other fire
departments within the County.
Police protection: Police protection is provided by the Burlingame Police
Department, which has a staff of 30 patrol officers as well as investigators, parking
enforcement officers, administrative and support personnel. The Department also
maintains a reserve office progtam to provide additional protection for the
community.
Schools: Educational facilities are provided by the Burlingame School District
which operates kindergarten through eighth grade school services within the
community. Burlingame High School, operated by the San Mateo Unified School
District also serves the residents of Burlingame.
Maintenance: Maintenance of governmental facilities is provided by the City of
Burlingame through the Public Works Department.
Solid waste disoosal: Solid waste and recycling pick up and hauiing is provided to
residents and businesses in Burlingame by Browning-Ferris Industries. Solid waste
material is transported to the South Bayside Unit Transfer Station located in San
Carlos. Ultimate disposal for material that cannot be recycled is transported to the
Ox Mountain Sanitary Landfill located in Half Moon Bay.
Proiect ImDacts
a) Fire protection| NI. Approval of the proposed project would have no impact lo fre
protection since proposed construction would add the potential for limited new fire hazards
to the site, primarily electrical wiring and controls. However, since new construction will
comply with applicable electrical and other building codes, there would be no impact with
regard to fire protection.
b) Police protection? NL The nature of the project would be such that there would be no
impact to police protection, since the facility would remain fenced and gated to preclude
general public access.
c) Schools? NL There would be no impact to school service should the proposed project be
approved to upgrade and modernize facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Facility since no
City o, Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 32
June 2002
new habitable stnrctures would be constructed that would generate school-aged children,
either directly or indirectly.
d) Other governmental service, including maintenance of public facilities? NI. Approval of
the proposed reorganization would have no impact to maintenance or general governmental
services. New and upgraded facilities proposed to be added to the wastewater plant would
reduce the need for maintenance by Public Works staff since new facilities generally
require less maintenance than older facilities.
e) Solid waste generation? LS. Minor and less-than-significant temporury increases in the
amount of solid waste is anticipated during the construction process. No long-term
increases in the amount of solid waste is anticipated since the proposed project would not
change basic operations of the wastewater treatment plant.
L4. Recreation
Environmental Setting
There are no parks on the project site, however, the site is surrounded on three sides by an
existing community park maintained by the City of Burlingame.
Proiect Imoacts
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks? NI.
Approval of the proposed project would have no impact on neighborhood, community or
regional parks since the project does not include construction, either directly or indirectly, of
habitable structures that would generate additional population that would use park facilities
in Burlingame. Construction of the proposed truck unloading area would reduce odors from
the facility on surrounding parkland.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction of recreational
facilities? NI. Since no development is proposed as part of the project, no recreational
services are required to be constructed and no impacts would result.
15. Transportation/Traffi c
Environmental Setting
The Wastewater Treatment Facility is served by Airport Boulevard, an arterial roadway
paralleling the eastern edge of San Francisco Bay. Regional access is provided by U.S. 101
(Bayshore Freeway), with the nearest off-ramp located at Broadway, northwest of the project
site.
Public transit service in San Mateo County is provided by SAMTrans, which operates bus
service on many arterial and collector roadways in the County.
Pedestrian access to the site if provided by sidewalks and walkways located east of the
Wastewater Treatment Facility.
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mp rovement Project
Page 33
June 2002
Proiect ImDactsa) Cause an increase in trffic which is substantial to existing trffic load and street capacity?
LS. A small temporary increase of local traffic is anticipated during the construction phase
of the proposed project, related to construction employee vehicles, construction vehicles
and delivery of construction goods and materials. This increase is anticipated to be
temporary, approximately 14 months? and would be less+han-significant. Thete would be
no long-term, permanent increases in traffic on local streets since there would be no
increases of staff at the facility.
b) 'Exceed, either individually or curnulatively, a LOS standard established by the County
CMAfor designated roads)? Nl. Since no residential, commercial, industrial or other type
of development is proposed as part of the project that would generate traffic above existing
levels, there wouldbr- no impact to CMA routes.
c) Change in a change of air traffc patterns? NI. The proposed project would have no impact
on air traffic pattems, since it involves minor changes to the City's Wastewater Treatrnent
Facility.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a designfeature or incompariDle ase? NI. No
changes to existing roadways or other transportation-related improvements are anticipated,
so there would be no impacts rcgarding transportation hazards.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? NI. No changes are proposed to existing local
circulation patterns, including driveways into the plant, so there would be no impacts or
degradation regarding emergency access routes.
f1 Inalequate parking capacity? NI. No impacts to existing parking are required since no
changes in the number of on-site personnel is proposed as part of the project. The site is
gated to preclude access and parking on the site by the general public.
g) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? Nl. No impacts would be created
regarding hazards or barriers to pedestrians or bicyclists since no changes to roadways or
driveways would occur as part of the proposed project.
16. Utilities and Service Systems
Environmen tal Settins
The project site is served by the following service providers:
. Water supply: City of Burlingame.
. Sewage collection, treatrnent and disposal: City of Burlingame
. Power: Pacific Gas & Electric
. Communications: Pacific Bell
City of Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 34
June 2002
Proiect ImDacts
a) Exceedwastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB? NI. The proposed would
include upgrades and modernization of the City's Wastewater Treatment Facility to improve
the efficiently and operation of the facility. It would not include increases in either dry
weather or wet weather treatment capacity. Therefore, there would be no impact with regard
to exceeding wastewater treatment requirements.
b) Require new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities? NI.
Although the proposed project includes upgrades to the Wastewater Treatment Facility,
there would be no expansion of treatment capacity should the project be implemented. No
increases in water facilities would be required as part of the proposed project. No impacts
would therefore result with regard to this topic.
c) Require new storm drainage facilities? NI. No additional impervious surfaces would be
added at the Facility that would increase the amount of stormwater runoff. No impact
would therefore result.
d) Are sfficient water supplies available? NI. l/o impact to existing water resources are
anticipated should the project be approved and implemented, since a significant quantity of
additional water would not be needed as part of the project.
e) Adequate wastewater capacity to serne the proposed project? LS. See response to "a,"
above.
0 Solid waste disposal? NI. See 13 "a," above.
g) Comply withfederal, state and local,statutes and regulations related to solid waste? N[.
The existing service provider will continue ensure adherence to federal, state and local
solid waste regulations should the proposed reorganization be approved. No impacts are
anticipated in this regard.
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of afish or wildlife species, cause afish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? No. The
preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse
impact on overall environmental quality, including biological resources or cultural
resources.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). No, the proposed project
involves minor upgrades and improvements to the existing City of Burlingame Wastewater
:
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mp rovement P roject
Page 35
June 2002
Treatment Facility. No increases in treatment capacity is proposed so no cumulative
impacts are anticipated should the project be implemented.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly? No. No such impacts have been discovered in
the course of preparing this Initial Study.
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Facil ity I mp rovement Project
Page 36
June 2002
City of Burlingame
Ruben Hurin, Planning Department
Jim Kelly, Public Works Department
Carollo Engineers ( Design Engineer )
Rick Chan, P.E. project manager
US Filter (wastewater treatfiTent contract operator)
Richard Pema, Construction Manager
References
Holman & Associates, Archeological Literature Review for the Burlingame Wastewater
Treatment Facility. Burlingame. San Mateo Countv. Califomia, August 2001
City of Burlingame
lnitial StudyMastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Initial Study Preparers
Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, project manager
H. Bill Sugaya, Carey & Co. (architectural resources)
Agencies and Organizations Consulted
The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study:
City of Burlingame, General Plan, 1972
Carollo Engineers, Wastewater Treatment Facilitv Improvement Project Improvement
Plans, 2002
Page 37
June 2002
Appendix 1
Historical Resources Evaluation
(Carey & Co.)
City ol Burlingame
lnitial Study/Vvastewater Treatment Facility lmprovement Project
Page 38
June 2002
HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT
DRAFT
Burlingome W astew ater T r eatment F acikty
Proposedlmprouenents
Burlingame, Califomia
May 74,2002
Prepareilfm
Jerry Haag, Urban Planner
CAREY & CO. INC.
ARCHITECTURE
HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT
DRAFT
Bwlingmw Wasuwater Treantant F acihty
Propsed Imyovemenx
Burlingame, Califomia
May 74,7002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS z
Z
2
3
5
6
7
7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
RESEARCH METHODS
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
DESCRIMION OF RESOURCES
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
CONCLUSIONS
ENDNOTES
included
included
PHOTOGRAPHS
CREDITS
l
HISTORIC RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT
DRAFT
Bwlnganne'W astew ater T r eatment F acikry
Proposedlmprwements
Burlingame, Califomia
May Z4,Z00Z
Suuoaeny oF FTNDINGS
At the request of Jerry Hrag, Urban Planner, Carey & Co. has undertaken an evaluation of the
property within the Area of Potendal Effect (APE) associated with the proposed Wastewater
Treatmenr Facility Improvements Project located in Burlingame, Califomia. The property is the
'W'astewater Treatment Facility located at 1103 Airport Boulevard in Burlingame, Califomia;
the APE boundary is identical to the wastewater treatment facility's boundary. This report is
being prepared for Section 106 review of the W'astewater Treatment Facility Improvements
Project.
After surveying the property, undertaking research at local agencies and archives, and
conducting interviews, Carey & Co. has determined that no resources within the APE are
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the Califomia Register of Historical
Resources.
PnoJrcr DrscnrrnoN
The \Tastewater Treatment Faciliry Improvements Project will be undertaken by the City of
Burlingame. The proposed project will replace older and out-of-date components of the faciliry
including, but not limited to, the replacement of the existing sludge dewatering building, update
rhe aeration system, update electrical components within the existing control room, replace a
drain pump and pipeline between the rwo primary clarifier tanks, modify an existing flare stack,
undertake minor interior modifications to the headworks portion of the facility, and constmct
new minor facilities including a new drain pump house, electrical building, and truck unloading
building.
RnsneRcu Mrrnoos
The survey area considered in this report is located in the ciry of Burlingame and consists of the
Burlingame W'astewarer Treatment Faciliry. The APE is defined as the boundaries of the
wasrewater treatment faciliry. Carey & Co. initially reviewed background materials provided for
this survey. '!7e conducted the site visit on May Zl,?.002. Research on the significance of the
faciliry was performed at the Burlingame Public Library, the Building and Planning Departments
Burlingame Vasuuuer Treatnatt Fatilitl
Burlingame , Califuaia
DRAFT - Histo,ric R esowces Evohution Repott - Ma1 24 , 2002
Page 318
at Burlingame Ciry Hall, the Burlingame Historical Society, and the San Francisco Public
Library and History Room. Additionally, Carey & Co. interviewed Burlingame Historical
Society Vice-President Diane Condon-'0(/irgler and US Filter Consm:ction Services Manager
Richard Pema.
Our evaluation was based on the eligibilicy criteria for the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) which requires that the resouce be at least fifry years old (except under special
circumstances), that it retain its historic integriry (the propenyk physical abiliry to convey its
significance), and that it be significant under at least one of four criteria at the national, state, or
local level. These four criteria include: association with historic events, association with
important persons, distinctive design or physical characteristics, and the potential to provide
important information about history or prehistory. In determining National Register eligibility,
we weighed known historical associations, architectural merit, and the current level of integriry.
We also evaluated the historic significance of the building using the established criteria of the
Califomia Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) in order to assess if it is eligible for listing in
the state register.
HISToRICAL OvERvIEw
The City of Burlingame is located on the north end of the original San Mateo Grant and the
south end of the Buri Buri Rancho. It was named for Anson Burlingame, the 19d century
diplomat who served as United States Minister fiom 1861 to 1867. By end of the century, due to
the warm weather and country atmosphere, many of San Francisco's wealthy men began
discovering the area and began building large summer marsions. In about 1896, there was the
beginnings of a real town, when land {iom Burlingame to Peniruula Avenue and EI Camino
Real to Dwight Road was suMivided. It was not until 1901, however, that any businesses were
established. Five years later, after the 1906 fire and earthquake in San Francisco, Burlingame was
on its way to being a small town with a population of about 200. After this, there was a flood of
new seftlers and by 1907, the population had grown to about 1,000. The city incorporated in
1908.
As the 2O'h century began, the increasing interest in Burlingame led to higher demand for public
infrasmrcrure such as water and sewer services. Like today's small communities who use septic
tanks as their primary form of wastewater treatment, Burlingame may have relied on
individualized ways of processing sewer during its early years. However, as the ciry grew it
needed "more effective methods of sewage treatment"I for the city as a whole. By the 1920s,
sewer was being collected in underground pipes in the developed areas of fie city and being
dumped directly into San Francisco Bay. The disadvantages of this situation drew the attention
of community members when Pacific City, an amusement park located on the current site of the
Burlingame Wastewater Treatment Facility, had to close in 1923 after only two years due to the
overwhelming smell of raw sewage.2
Burlingame Vostewau Treatnem F acilirl
Bwlirgmre, CoJitornia
DRAFT - Historic Re sowces Euahiation REoft - Ma1 24 , 2@2
Page 418
This "menace to the community's health"3 continued unabated for 11 more years until, in June
i934, the federal govemment's Public \Uorks Adminisrration (Pr0fA) offered a glant of $40,000
and a loan for almost $110,000 toward the design and construction ofa wastewater treatment
faciliry for Burlingame.4 In retum for dris money, the city was required to back the loan portion
with a bond isue. An agreement with nearh Hillsborough, in which that city would contribute
approximately $20,000 and share use of the facility, as well as the expectation of consmrction-
related employmenr led to a successful bond issue vote in the amount of$86,000 the following
month.
Confident of the overwhelming communiry support, engineers began working on the design
even before the bond issue vote. Designers included City Engineer C. M. Thomas, Burlingame's
project manager, as well as a Berkeley-based private consultant, Henry N. Jenks.s Early in the
process, Thomas described the existing sewer situation and outlined the direction of the city's
fu ture intentions, saying,
...Six outfalls now empty into the bay, polluting the water. Under the proposed
plan, an intersecting line will be consmrcted, cross cutting these ourfall lines
along Bayshore highway. The sewage will be conducted ro a cenmal plant by
graviry. A pumping plant will then force the sewage 1200 feet into the bay where
the city owns 42 acres of properry, the site for the proposed treatment plant. The
sewage will be given preliminary ffeatment, the later [sic] will be emptied into
the bay and the residue sterilized and disposed of, partially as fertilizer.
It is proposed to trap gas from the digestor [sic] and use this as power to
operate the pumping plant, thus cutting the maintenance cost.6
No time was lost in designing the faciliry; by January, 1935, the enrire sewer plant design had
been drafted, revised, finalized, and approved for bid.7 Within weeks, conrracts were awarded to
three different companies for the fill, "interceptor sewer," and "disposal plant" phases of the
project.s \07ork began immediately, widr some already completed by the end of the summer, and
the remainder probably finished soon thereafter.e
Although details are not available, it is likely that the plant's original design included at least
one each of the basic features needed at the time to process sewage. These included a force
main, to bring wastes from the city to the faciliry; a settling tank, to allow wastes ro separate
before being processed; a digester tank, to process the waste; a sludge drying bed, to dry the
processed waste in the sun before transferring it to mrcks for disposal; and miscellaneous sheds
and other structures for storage, administration, and other functions.to All of these items were
concentrated in what is now the northwest comer of the facility, with the digester(s) in the
center encircled by the remaining necessary items.ll
According to Thomas, the original facility was meant to function without alteration for
approximately ten yea.s. \7ith the expectation that increases in population and demand would
require expansion in the mid-1940s, he indicated that the facility would "be consm:cred ro
allow the addition of units at a minimum cos!."12 History appears to have proven the city
Bwlinga nc'W astew atsr Treomwnt F acihrl
Bwhngolale, Califomia
DRAFT - HLstrrric Raources Ec)ahtotion Repon - May 24, 2002
Page 518
engineer correct, as the next work undertaken appears to have been contracted with Growers
Service & Supply Co. in t947 to remove sludge and constn:ct additional "tanks and other
equipment."l3 It is unclear what this included, however later drawings indicate that a settling
tank and four sludge drytng beds may have constn:cted some time after the original plant's
completion.ra Burlingame expanded northward in the mid-1950s, increasing the city's land and
population by almost 3Oo/o.rs As such, the next renovation, in 1968, substantially changed and
added to the facility. Demolition plans show that by this time the plant included two digesters,
three settling tanks, five sludge drying beds, a conmol house, rwo large shed, several
miscellaneous tanks and gas mains, a force main, and a weather station. Of these, all of these
srructure and objects were removed or heavily altered, with the notable exception of the rwo
digesters. The faciliry was expanded east and south during this project as well, defining much of
the current boundary. Throughout the next decades, particularly in the 1980s and 1990s,
modifications have been made to the 1960s-era elements.l6 However, the two pre-1968 digesters
have not been heavily altered and continue to function today as originally intended.
DrscnrptroN oF Rrsouncrs
The Burlingame Wastewater Treatment Faciliry site is located in Burlingame, Califomia,
approximately 17 miles south of San Francisco, northeast of the Broadway exit off of Highway
101 and northwest of the west end of Sanchez Creek Channel. It sits along the south side of
Airport Boulevard within a partially-wooded, relatively undeveloped piece of land bounded by
Airport Boulevard and the San Francisco Bay to the north, Highway 101 to the southwest, and
Anza Boulevard to the east. Trees, a non-historic masonry barrier wall, and a small baseball park
adjacent to the site partially shield the facility from view.
The Burlingame Wastewater Treatment Faciliry consists of a collection of primarily concrete
and metal structures and objects sitting on a paved ground plane and enclosed by a non-historic
masonry barrier wall along Airport Boulevard. Stnrctures and objects within the faciliry include
pipelines, settling and holding tanks, anaerobic digesters, pumps, a sludge dewatering building, a
laboratory, administrative buildings, and other miscellaneous strucrures. In plan these structures
and objects are roughly organized into three zones, smaller circular processing tanks in the
nofthwest comer, adminisrration and holding tanks in the northeast comer, and two large
circular tanks with related equipment in the south. The main entrance to the faciliry is located
along Airport Boulevard at the northeast comer of the faciliry.
Most exterior surfaces are painted or unpainted concrete and metal while most of the floors,
wa[s, and ceilings of the inhabited buildings feature hard, flat finishes such as painted concrete
and masonry or tile. Though the interior walls of at least one building have a rwo-toned paint
scheme, most of the structures and objects generally display no architectural sryle or decorative
treatment.
Bwlingane V asuwaw Treaanmt F acikcy
Burlingane, Cdifmtit
DRAFT - Hisrorir R esovrces Epahmrian R@n - Ma1 24 , 2002
Page 618
The two pre-1968 anaerobic digesters sit side-by-side in the nofthwest comer of the facility, near
the barrier wa[ and Airport Boulevard. Both are of reinforced concrete consfiuction, ale
approximately 45' in diameter, and are approximately rwo stories in heighr. They feature painted
concrete exterior walls, which display formwork scars but are generally smooth in texrure, and a
curved metal railing above rhe parapets. Most pipes and related equipment are concentrated on
the roo( resulting in an obscured view of the roof structure itself as well as broad expanses of
unimpeded concrete wall surface. When empty, facility staff access the interior of each digester
through circular hatches located on the exterior walls near the gound plane. These hatches
contain numerous large bolts that must be removed before use. A non-historic infill building
between the two structures has encased some of ttre exterior wall surface. The digester interiors
are unfinished reinforced concrete-
Despite their many similarities, the two digesters have a few subtle architectural differences. The
east, or "primary," digester displays a shallow step-back approximately half-way up the exterior
wall, creating the appearance of a tall plin*r. The parapet, a narrow concrete band with rwo
deep grooves, protrudes out, noticeably surpassing the plinth wall plane. The wesr, or
"secondary," digester also features a tripartite organization. In this case, however, the base step-
back is very close to ground-level and the parapet consists ofa wide, stepped band that promrdes
past the digester's wall plane. Five tension cables encircle *re parapet.
STATET'{ENT oF STGNTRcANcE
After surveying t}e property, undetaking research at local agencies and archives, and
conducting interviews, Carey & Co. has determined that no resources within the APE are
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the Califomia Register of Historical
Resources. To be listed in the NRHP and CRHR, a properry musr first be over fifiy years old
and, not only be shown to be significant under the evaluation criteria for rhe respecrive regisrers,
but it must also possess historic "integrity." Integrity is defined as "the ability ofa property to
convey it significance." Both the National Register and Califomia Regisrer criteria recognize
seven aspects or qualities that define integriry: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship,
feeling and associarion. Almost all of the resources within the APE are not yet fifry years old.
The two remaining pre-1968 digesters may be over fifry years old and may be associated with an
important event at the local level, the development ofa publicly-sporsored sewer processing
plant in Burlingame, however the removal of almost of the original faciliry's smrctures and
objects has compromised four aspects of its integrity, including its design, materials,
workmanship, and feeling. Additionally, the rwo remaining pre-1968 digesters, which may be
over fifty years old, are not significant examples of a rlpe or period of architecture, nor have they
yielded or likely to yield information about prehistory or history.
Bwlingmre Vlatewatn'freamett F acilirl
Bwlingane, Calilonia
DRAFT - Hiscoric Res ourcu Eoahution Repon - Ma1 24 , 2002
Page 718
CoNcLUsroN
Through a site survey and an examination of researched information and interview tegarding
the proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Project in Burlingame, Califomia,
Carey & Co. has determined that the APE does not include any historic resources within its
boundaries.
ENDNOTES
l. D. Bames and F. \Uilson, The Design and Operatian of Small Sewage Worla (London: E. & F.
Spon Ltd., 1976): l.
2. Diane Condon-\7irgler, Butlingame Historical Society Vice-President, personal
communication with the author, May 17 ,7007.
3. "The Campaign of '34," comp. Constance Lister, ed. Geoffery A. Currall, in A Hisrory o1
Bwhnganw (Burlingame, CA: Burlingame Historical Society, 1978): 101. Originally published
serially in San M ateo Tirnes (c. 1935): n.p.
4. The Burlingame sewer plant was one of three P\UA infrastructure improvement programs in
San Mateo County. The others were a sewer plant in San Mateo and a harbor project in
Redwood Ciry. (Bwlingatne A&tance-Star vol. 54, no. 155 [July 3, 19341: l.)
5. "Ciry Council Puts Engineer at \Uork Upon Sewer Project," BruUngame Advance-Stor vol.54,
no. 167 [July 18, 1934]: 1.
6. 'City Council r0Uould Charge Water Users To Raise Fund," Burl.ingam e Aduance-Star vol. 54,
no. 160 [July 10,1934):2.
7. "Notice of Completion," September 3, 1935, Document Number 88-242, Burlingame
Historical Sociery Archives, Butlingame, Califomia; "Sewer Plant Plans Approved," Bwlinga ne
Advance-Sw vol. 55, no. 7-Z [Jaouary 26, 1935): 1.
8. "List Sewer \7ork Bidders," Bwhngame Advance-Star vol. 55, no. 36 [February 12,1935): 1.
9. "Notice of Completion," September 3, 1935, Document Number 88-242, Burlingame
Historical Sociery Archives, Burlingame, Califomia. No direct documentation was uncovered
indicating the exact date of completion for the entire project. However, the large amount of
communiry support and the speed at which the city's previous decisions were made suggests that
finishing the construction of the facility was a very high prioriry.
10. "City Council Would Charge lifater Users To Raise Fund," Bwlingame Aduance-Srar vol. 54,
no. 160 [July 10, 19341:2; Jenks & Adamsoi, Wastewater Treatment & Reclamation Worls:
Bwhngame Wastewatzr Treatrnem F acihtl
Burlingate, Caldamio
DRAFT - Hisrom R esotnces Evaluadon Repoft - Mo,f 24 , 2002
Page 818
Existing Plant Lqout [drowingsl (Butlingame, CA: City of Burlingame, January 1968):2 of 77;
Richard Pema, US Filter Consm:ction Sewices Manager, personal communication with the
autlror, May 71,2002.
I 1. ; Jenks & Adamson, Wastewater Treatment & Reclamation Varl<s [drawingsJ (Burlingame,
CA: Ciry of Burlingame, January 1968):2 of 77 .
12. "City Council \fould Charge Water Users To Raise Fund," BurLngame Aduance-Star voi. 54,
no. 160 [July 10,19341:2.
13. "Contract," A pril Zl, 1947 , Document Numb er 88-74?-' Burlingame Historical Society
Archives, Burlingame, Califomia.
14. Jenks & Adamson, W'astewater Treatment & Reclamation Worl<s: Eisting Plant Loyut
[drawings] (Burlingame, CA: City of Burlingame, January 1968): 2 of 77
I5. Diane Condon-Wirgler, Burlingame Historical Society Vice-President, personal
communication with the author, May 17,2002.
16. 1103 Building Permit File, City of Burlingame Building Department, Burlingame, Califomia.
Bwkngame Wastewatsr Tieomrnt F ocilicy
Bwhngorw,California
DRAFT - Hutorrc Resowces Eualuation Report - May 24 , 2002
Photo 1: Mew of current wastewater ueatment faciliry looking west, primary and secondary
digesters indicated
Photo 2: View of primary (foreground) and secondary (background) digesters, looking
southwest
-.*r
i
'.:ta:;:1;"
1"
il ,-s
B urlingatw Vastcw otsr Ti eurnent F acihry
Burlingume, C difornia,
DRAFT - Historic Resources Euahution Repan - May 24 , 2002
Photo 3: View of primary digester, looking southwest
Photo 4: Mew of secondary digester, looking southwest
Tr-.
,.:
&
5
B w\ngonw Wos tcw aer Ti eatment F acikry
Bwhngame, California
DRAFT - Hiscoric Resources Evahntion Report - Mo1 24 , 2002
Photo 5: Mew of primary digester detail, access hatch
Photo 6: View of secondary digester detail, parapet tension cables
t
fr,,Il,,tr:t ':..,.i
."') -
:1, oa
tt
Burlingmw Vaszq)aer Ti eafinett F acihrl
Bwlinganc,Cahfomia
DRAFT - Histonc Resowces Evaluation Report - May 24 , 2002
Photo 7: View of primary digester and non-historic infill
structure, Iooking west
Burlingonle Vastewatq'heament F aciht)
Burlingame, Califonb
DRAFT - Hisort R aources Evdvatian Retrcr:' - Maj 24, 2002
CREDITS
The following individuals participated in this historic resource evaluation report:
Carey E Co.lnc.Alice Carey, Principal
Hisashi B. Sugaya, Project Manager
Sarah M. Dreller, Architectural Historian
Appendix 2
Architectural Resources Evaluation
(Holman & Associates)
City of Burlingame
I n itial StudyMastewater Treatment Faci I ity I mprovement Project
Page 39
June 2002
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
)
t
1
I
:
OX/27/2002 04:32 F-{I 925 930 0208
?lOLfy)At@lnssoc,orES
Ap.ch creoilogicol Consulf.o;zfs
CAROLLO enalneers
.SINCE
'XE 'EO]T I G"
56.7.5 FOLSOM STCALIFORNIA 941TO
@ ooi
SAN FRANCISCO,4Ls/S3O-7286
Rick Chan
Carollo Engineers
2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 9,4598
August 3l , 2001
Dear Mr. Chan:
RE: ARCHAEOLOi:iICAL LIIERATURE REVIEW FOR THE BURLINGAME
WASTEWATER TITEATMENT FACILITY, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY,
CALIFORMA
At your requ,:st I have completed an archaeological literatle review and a check with the
Sacred Lands Iile concerning the potential ofthe discovery ofprehistoric archaeological remains
irside the proposed project area. The following is a sunmar-'t/ of information gained by me to
&te.
LITERATURE REV'IEW
An archaeological literature rcview (Iile no. 0l-458) was conducted by me to obtain
information regarding recorded archaeological sites in and around the project area, and any
information about previous archaeological reports which mav have covered the project area.
There are no recorde,j prehistoric or historic sites inside or uitiin a quaier mile ofthe project
area; the 1899 U.S.C.S. map of this area shows that the current site of the treatment faciliw was
theu a part ofthe bay.
There has onr: archaeological survey of rhe entire project area which failed to turn up
ei*rer historic or preldstoric archaeological materials. In 1980 David chavez reported on thl
fiNdiNgS Of A SUNEY rMtirlcd CULTURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION FOR THE AIRPORT
BOULEVARD WIDENING PRoJEcr, BURLINGAME; C.ALIFORNIA which covered a much
larger area surroundiltg the tream€nt plani.
Finally a che<.J< was made with the Native Arnerican l{eritage Commission (see
attachmerts) conceming a check of t}re sacred Lands file. Nothing was listed there, and a
recommendation was made to contact knowledgeable Native American informants. A rotal of I 0
letters were written (see attachments), but as ofthis date only Irene Zwerlein has responded; she
had no information tc, share regarding the Native American uses ofthe general area.
)
)
)
03/27/2002 04:33 F-4.X S25 930 0208 CAROLLO enSlneers
This report nrakes no firther recomoendations regarding the search for archaeoiogical
marerials which may be affected by development: the historical filling ofthe area to build facility
precludes the discovery of buried prehistoric materials, and a comprehensive field inspection for
both prehistoric and historic materials in 1980 failed to find anyhing.
@ 006
D
Sincerely,
rye--r
)
'_
2
)
Miley Paul Holman
Holman & Associates
NATTVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
915 CAP]TOL MALL, ROOM 364
SACRAMENTO, CA 958I4
(91 6) 6s3-4082
Fax (916) 6s7-s390
Web Site www.nahc.ca.gov
July 20, 2001
Miley Paul Holman
Holman & Associates
3615 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
RE:Cultural assessment for the proposed Burlingame Wastewater Treatment Facility - San
Mateo County
A record search of the sacred lands file has failed to indicate the presence of Native American
cultural resources in the immediate project area. The absence of specific site information in
the sacred lands file does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area.
Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known
and recorded sites.
Enclosed is a list of Native Americans individuals/organizations who may have knowledge of
cultural resources in the project area. The Commission makes no recommendation or preference
of a single individual, or group over another. This list should provide a starting place in locating
areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of
those indicated, if they cannot supply information, they might recommend other with specific
knowledge. A minimum of two weeks must be allowed for responses after notification.
lf you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from any these individuals
or groups, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain
current information. lf you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
me at (916) 653-4038.
Si rely,
Pilas-Treadway
Envi Specialist lll
Dear Mr. Holman:
NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACTS
San Mateo CountY
JulY 20, 2001
EIla Rodriguez
PO Box 1411
! Salinas,
(831) 632-0490
Ohlone/Costanoan93902 Esselen
Thomas P. Soto
PO Box 269
Foresilhill,
Ohlone/Costanoan
95631
CA
JaKiKehl
5461 Beaver LaneByron, 94514
CA
(925) 516-1670
CA
(s30)
(530)
367-4402
367-5083
I
I Ohlone/Costanoan
Amah/M utsunTribal Band
lrme Zwierlein
789 Canada Road
Woodside, CA 94062
(650) 851-7747 - Home
(650) 851-7489 - Fax
(408) 364-1393 - Cell
Ohlone/Costanoan
lndian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan
Ohlone&ostanoan Ann Marie Sayer, Chairperson
Northem Vatley Yokut P.O. Box 28 OhloneCIostanoanHollister, C A 95024-0
Bay Miwok (510) 6374238
Kdherine Erolinda Perez> 1234LunaLaneStockton, 95206
CA
- (209) 941-1900 work
Mariorie Ann Reid
_ 19279 Lexington LaneRedding, 96003
CA
The Ohlone lMian Tribe
Ohlone/Coastanoan AndrewGalvan
PO Box 3152
Mission San Jose, C A 94539
Ohlone/Costanoan
(s1
(51
(51
656-0787 - Voice
882-0527 - Cell
656-0780 - Fax
Michelle Zmmer
4952 McCoy AvenueSanJose, 95130
CA
(408) 3il-1391 - Home
(408) 3il-1393 - Fa<
(408) 210-8061 - Cell
Ohlone/Costanoan
Thls lkt ls cunent only as d tte date ol rfilB document
IrisElbuton of thb tlEtdoes mtrefieveany persan of statrbry reporsilrllty as dofinod ln Secton 70O0.5 dtre ]ledlh and Sety Code, Secdlon
fll9794othe R^rbfic Resorrces Codeand-Sbc&rn 5OO738 dlhe PubfiG RGsoutces Code.
Thb list is only appllcable lor contacttrg local lrlatve Ameritnrs $dth rcgErds !o the culhrd *sessment for lhe proPced
Burlingame WasEnracr Treatnent Facility, San MaEo County.
@AOL.com
Trina Marine Ruano Family
Ramona Garibay, Representative
37974 Canyon Hts. Drive Ohlone/CostanoanFremont, C A 94536
(510) 792-1642
(510) 673-5029 - Cell
i
i
Y2OLt'72167.fQassocrArEs
Ara.ch oeologico,L Consultant s
36LS FOLSoM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 94110
..SINC E YHE
'EGIXXIXG,,
Sincerely,
SAN FRANCISCO,4L3/s5O-72A6
Marjorie Arur Reid
19279 Lexirgton Larre
Redding, CA 96003
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY,
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
\,t|+trL
Miley Paul Holman
YIOLW)67.7Slessoc'orEs
Apch oeolog icol Consultont s
..SINCE IHE BEGIXXING,,
Miley Paul Holman
36-LS FOLSoM ST.
CALIFORNIA 94110 sAN FRANCISCO,
4L3/SSO-7986
Wu,t-
Michelle Zimmer
4952 McCoy Avenue
San Jose, CA 95130
August 30. 2001
R-E: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDINGNATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
iMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project axea. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential culhral resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
YIOLt"DAfS)xssocHrEs
Aach oeolo g i co,l C onsult ant s
Thomas P. Soto
P.O. Box 269
Forest Hill, CA 95631
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COIJNTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Aithough they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my oftice
address? i have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez ofthe project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any infonnation you might have.
Sincerely,
3,675 FOLsoM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 94110 sAN FRANCISCO,4Ls/530-79A6
W{r,-
Miley Paul Holman
..SINCE THE BEGIXI{ING,,
YIOLYY)6;.7SlnssocrArEs
Aachoeolog icol Consultant s
..SINCE THE BEGI}'NIXG.,
56Ls F()LSOM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 94110
uPh.
sAN FRANCISCO,4Ls/5sO-7286
Amah/Mutsun Tribal Band
Irene Zwerlein
789 Canada Road
Woodside, CA94062
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT T}IE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COLINTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an eariier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
Miley Paul Holman
YIOLY'p,67.WLott.,crArEs-Apch creoLogico,L Consult'o,nts
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan
Ann Marie Sayer, ChairPerson
P.O. Box 28
Hollister, CA95024
..S!}{CE THE BEGIrlT{ING,,
Sincerely,
1,61-3 FOLSoM 5T.eAllponrulA 94tr.o SAN FRANCISCO,
4L5/930-79A6
August 30, 2001
RE:REQUESTFoRINFoRMATIoNREGARDINGNATIVEAMEzuCANCULTURAL
nEsouncssATTHEBURLINGAMEWASTEWATERTREATMENTFACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COLINTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search cif their
Sacred Lands fiies for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? i have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surlace evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any inforrnation you might have.
t0{r-
Miley Paul Holman
YIOL1 Y)67.lQlessocrArEs
Apc}:c:eolo gical Consultonts
"SI}ICE THE SEGIXNING,,
Miley Paul Holman
36ts FOLSoM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 94110 sAN FRANCISCO,
4L3/330,-7986.
i^P4\
The Ohlone Indian Tribe
Andrew Galvan
P.O. Box 3 152
Mission San Jose, CA 94539
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOT]RCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BI.TRLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact yoir regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez ofthe project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
YIOLfY)CI7glassocHrEs
Apch aeoLogicol Consultont s
"srrcE THE BEGI'{NIXG"
5615 FOLSOM sT. sAN FRANCIEC_OeAr-lronNlne4LLo 4ls/sso-7286
Trina Marine Ruano Family
Ramona Garibay, Representati ve
37974 Canyon Heights Drive
Fremont, CA 94536
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BIJRLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COLTNTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands fiies for the above referenced project area' Although they did not have any
inforrration regarding this projec! they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any inforrnation you wish to share, would you please write me at my offtce
address? I have conducted an archaeological literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez ofthe project area failed to yield any
surface evidence ofcultural resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
August 30, 2001
,iltt -
Miley Paul Holman
YIOLYY)A(glxssocrArEs
Ap.ch oeolog icol Consultonts
..SINCE THE BEGIXT{ING,,
36-15 FOLsoM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 94110 SAN FRANCISCO,47i/9sO-7286
Ella Rodriguez
P.O. Box l4l I
Salinas, CA 93902
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COL'NTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you trave any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literatue review to date, and have discovered that
al earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of culhral resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
Wt*
Miley Paul Holman
P2oLfy)Afg)assocrArEs
Ap.cbcreolo g icol Consulto,nts
..SINCE THE B EGIXT{ING,,
367s FOLSoM 5T.
CALIFORNIA 947LO
SAN FRANCISCO,4LS/3fo'-7286
Jakki Kehl
5461 Beaver Lane
Byron, CA 94514
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COI.INTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding ttris project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cuitural resources at this site.
If you have any information you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeological literafire review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconnaissance by David Chavez ofthe project area failed to yield any
surface evidence ofculhral resources. I will appreciate any information you might have.
Sincerely,
Miley Paul Holman
\Pry,.
YIOLfY)A@)nssocrArEs
Aachae,oLogicol Consultont s
..SINCE TXE BEGI'{XING,,
367s FOLsoM ST.
CALIFORNIA 94LLO
\,?4L
SAN FRANCISCO,473/S50-7286
Katherine Erolinda Perez
1234 Luna Lane
Stockton, CA95206
August 30, 2001
RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL
RESOURCES AT THE BURLINGAME WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BIJRLINGAME, SAN MATEO COI.INTY.
I recently wrote the Native American Heritage Commission regarding a search of their
Sacred Lands files for the above referenced project area. Although they did not have any
information regarding this project, they recommended that I contact you regarding any
information you might have regarding potential cultural resources at this site.
If you have any infonnation you wish to share, would you please write me at my office
address? I have conducted an archaeologicat literature review to date, and have discovered that
an earlier archaeological reconaaissance by David Chavez of the project area failed to yield any
surface evidence of cultural resources. I will appreciate any infonnation you might have.
Sincerely,
Miley Paul Holman
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
July 26, 2OO2
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
8t05t02
8f
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
A
BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
THE MARSTEN STORM DRAIN PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENT AND OUTFALL PIPELINE
PROJECT - CITY PROJECT NO. 80520
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution approving a
professional engineering services agreement with Winzler and Kelly Consulting Engineers in the amount of
$377,230.
BACKGROLIND: On May 17 ,2002, a Request for Proposal was issued to qualified engineering firms
and four proposals were received. Staff interviewed the engineering firms and selected Winzler and Kelly
Consulting Engineers based on their experience in similar projects, understanding and familiarity with the
project, and discussion with previous clients. The proposed work includes design, cost estimating, plans and
specifications preparation, contract document preparation, geotechnical investigation, surveying and easement
acquisition, Caltrans coordination, permitting, and CEQA process assistance.
Staff recommends that Winzler and Kelty Consulting Engineers be awarded the contract for the total fee of
$377 ,320 for these services, which is approximately 10.5 % of the total estimated construction cost of
$3,600,000. The industry standard for this type of project is approximately 12%.
PROJECT: The storm drain improvement work is Phase 4 of the citywide stonn drain program to provide
protection against a 3O-year storm event and consists of an improvement to the Marsten Storm Drain Pump
Station and construction of a new discharge pipeline extending from the Marsten Pump Station, under Highway
101 and Bayshore Boulevard, to an outfall location within Easton creek.
It is estimated that the design phase will be completed by February 2003. Staff will return to Council in the
spring of 2003 for the award of a construction contract as well as an agreement for construction phase
professional services.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Agreement
BLJDGET IMPACT: There are adequate funds available in Account No. 320-80520 to fund this expenditure.
Ooug
650-558-7230
c: S. Murtuza, City Engineer
E. Hirschhorn, Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers
City Clerk, Finance Department
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80520.WKellyStaffRptJul02wpd.wpd
RESOIT NO.
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGINEERS
MARSTEN STORM DRAIN PI'MP STATION MPROVEMENT
AND OUTFALL PIPELINE PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 80520
RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this
Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in
the title above.
2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and
on behalf of the City of Burlingame.
3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiry that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of 2402, and was adopted thereafter by the foltowing vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COI]NCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
A.
B.
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
CONSTJLTAITT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered intothis day of
2OO2, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the
"City", and WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGINEERS., engaged in providing
PROf,'ESSIONALENGIITEERING consulting services herein called the "Consultant".
RECITALS
The City is considering undertaking activities to perform engineering services.
The City desires to engage a Professional Engineering Consultant to provide
consulting services in conjunction with the engineering design, preparation of
plans & specifications, contract documents for the Marsten Storm I)rain Pump Station
and Outfall Pipeline, CP 80520, because of Consultant's experience and
qualifications to perform the desired work.
C.The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualifred and willing to
perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide all services as set forth in
Exhibit A of this Agreement.
Time ofPerformance. The services ofthe Consultant are to commence upon
the execution of this Agreement with completion on or about September
2002.
Cornpliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable
laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local
laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses,
permits, qualifications and approvals ofwhatsoevernature which are legally
required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and
warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in
effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses,
permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice
its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business
license.
Revised: Ju1y25,2002 Page I Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520wKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
2
3
7
8
9
Sole Responsibilitv. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or
engaging all persons necessaq/ to perform the services underthis Agreement.
Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the
City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this
Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the
completion of Consultant's seryices or at the City's written request. All
reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant
in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement
are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant
shall not make any of the these documents or information available to any
individual or organization not employed by the Consultant orthe City without
the written consent ofthe City before such release. The City acknowledges
that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement
are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the
information contained inthe reportspreparedby the Consultant in connection
with other projects shall be solely at Ciqr's risk, unless Consultant expressly
consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate
any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been
confrrmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant.
Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not
exceed $377,230.00; and payment shall be based upon City approval of each
task.
Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation ofthe work performed
by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications,
documents or ottrer pertinent materials shatl be submitted for Ciqr review,
even if only in partial or draft form.
Availabilit-v of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting
this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work
under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to
authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business
hours upon written request of the City.
Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under
this Agreement shall be Elizabeth Hirschhorn.
Assienability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this
Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these
services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent ofthe
City.
Revised: July 25,2002 Page 2 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
4.
5.
6.
10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and
properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to:
To City:
To Consultant:Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers
417 Montgomery Street, Ste 600
San Francisco, CA 94104 - 2704
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address
as Consultant designates in writing to City.
1 l. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the
performance ofthe work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and
be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As
an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement
benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior
written consent, the Consultant may perforan some obligations under this
Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility
for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement.
Consultant agrees to testiff in any litigation brought regarding the subject of
the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be
compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and
testiSing in such matters at its ther, .,r.reni trourty iates of compinsation,
unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of
Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing.
t2.Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional
responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain
any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no
business holdings or agreements with any individual member ofthe Staff or
m.rnagement ofthe City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such
holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not
presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to thoseof the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately
disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and
shall, at the Crt5r's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant
shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not
employ a person having such an interest in this perfoffnance of this
Revised: 1dy25,2002 Page 3 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAME\My Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
Syed Murtuza, City Engineer
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has
employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with
its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notiff City of
this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever
any such employment relationship.
13. Equal Emplovment Ooportunitv. Consultant warrants that it is an equal
opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing
equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do
and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking
employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, tace, marital status,
sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disabilit5r, national origin,
religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act.
14. Insurance.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance:
Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him,/her
and his/her frrm to an amount not less than: one million dollars
($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
inj.rry, personal injury and property damage.
ll.Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the
contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring
himlher and his/her staffto an amount not less than one million
dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for
bodily irrj"ry and property danage.
iii Consultant shall provide to the City all certificates of insurance,
with original endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant
agrees that all certificates and endorsements are to be received
and approved by the City before work commences.
iv Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than
$1,00O,OO0 which is sufficient to insure Consultant for
professional errors or omissions in tl:e perforrnance of the
particular scope of work under this agreement.
Revised: tu1y25,2002 Page 4 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
l.
B. General Liability:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf ofthe Consultant; products
and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or
used by the Consultant. This requirement does not apply to the
professional liability insurance required for professional errors
and omissions.
11.The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances maintained by the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be
excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
ll1.Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of tlre policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
lv The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
C.All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days'
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been
given to the City. current certification of such insurance shall be kept
on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City
Clerk.
D In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law and
shall provide evidence of such policy to the City before beginning
services under this Agreement. Further, Consultant shall ensure that
all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required
Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees.
Indemnification. The Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless
indemniff and defend the City its officers, agent, employees and volunteers
from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity that
l.
15.
Revised: Jttly25,2002 Page 5 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
m;ay at any time arise orbe setup because ofdamages to proper$r orpersonal
injury received by reason of, or in the course ofperforming work which may
be occasioned by a willful or negligent act or omissions ofthe Consultant, or
any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant.
16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy
hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party
may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this
Agreement constitute a continuing waiver ofa subsequent breach ofthe stune
or any other provision of this Agreement.
17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be
governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for
any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior or Municipal
Court of the Count;r of San Mateo or Santa Clara.
18.Termination ofAgreement. The City and the Consuttant shatl have the right
to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than
fifteen (15) days wriffen notice of termination. In the event of termination,
the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports,
performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City
shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum
contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services
contemplated under ttris Agreement, unless such termination is made for
cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the
particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination.
19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment
of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City
and the Consultant.
20 Disputes. In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, as well as costs not to
exceed $7,500 in total.
21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms,
conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modifu or vary this
Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be
bound, shall be binding on either party.
Revised: Jriy25,2002 Page 6 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documens\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
IN .WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this
Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (l).
City of Burlingame
City Manager
City of Burlingame
Consultant: Winzler and Kelly
Consulting Engineers
Print Name
Title
ATTEST:
City Clerk City Attorney
Revised: tuly25,2O12 Page '1 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BURllNGAME\Local Settings\Temp\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
Approved as to form:
CITY OF BURL]NGAME
MARSTEN PUi'P STANON PROJECT
FEE PROPOSAL
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND DESIGN PHASES
w&KTotal
Labor
o
oo
ul
6io6.=9t<o
oontD
Fl
li,oo6uo_
ioo
ii5 uooo
o)
.E
oo
'E,c
UJc>ooraaof26
w&K Total
(L.bor +
Exoencee)TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE
1_1 Prclect Klckoff Meetino $2.010 s1 20 $2.130 82.130
1.)Preorn Pbloct Wort Plan $1.510 $60 s1.570 sl.570
.t.3 Attend Coordinatlon Meotlnos (51 $6.025 $375 $6.400 s6.400
,t.t Review Erbtlno lnfomatlon $6.980 $330 $7.310 s7.310
1.5 DeveloD Dclon Cdteria $6.280 $250 s6_530 $6.530
.t5 Revlew Hvdmullca/Hvdrclmv s7.630 $330 $7.960 97.960
17 Evrluet Eristlno Slte tnd Ploes s2.720 sl 10 $2.830 $2.830
1-8 ldentifi, Allonment Altametlve3 86.340 $!!10 s6.650 $6.650
t.9 Evaluate PS Tvo6 & Sitlno Altemative6 $7.950 $380 $8.330 $8.330
t.t0 Revlew Ea3ement Rmulrements 82.230 sl60 s2.390 s2.390
1.11 Conduct Geotechnlcal Re3earch $1,340 $60 $12,650 $1,400 $14,050
1.12 Evaluate Soll Contemination Potentlal s3.600 $260 $3.860 $3.860
1.13 Coordlnate Ucaltrans & Cltv Prolocti s7.140 s400 $7.540 $7.540
t.ltL Conduct Predsion Charctto $6.940 $480 s575 $7.420 $7.995
1.16 Revletv Cr.ok crc3rlng3 and End
Connmtlon
$5,920 $300 $6,220 $6,220
1.16 Pemlt Ais13ttnca $5.620 E3r0 $5.930 $5.930
1.17 Preprre Ertlmates of Probabla
c6n.lnr.ti6n C6af for Altemallvei
$3,s60 s100 $3,720 $3,720
1.18 Plopare Altomatives Analy3is Repolt $12.260 $910 s1 3.1 70 $'13.170
PI{ASE ISUBTOTAL $ 96.055 s 5.305 s ,tlt )25 s 3 s 101.360 t tt4.585
. DESIGN PHASE
2,1 Conduct Suffeys and ltiapplng $1,720 $1,280 $5,750 0'10,350 s3,000 s19,100
2.2 Conduct Geotechnlcal lnv.stlgatlon/Roport $960 0140 $24,725 sl,100 $25,825
2.3 As3l3t wlth Envtronmanlrl (cEoA)$9,820 $960 $10,780 $10,780
2.1 Attond Agency Coordlnatlon Meetlngs (10)$3,680 s390 $4,070 $4,070
2.5 Prepare 50% Plans and Spaclfication3 $63,120 $3,340 $66,460 $60,460
2.6 Mect wlth clty to Rcvlow commentt 91,140 $140 $1,280 s1,280
2.7 Preparo 90% Plan3 and Spoclflcatlon3 $49,250 $2,730 $51,980 $51,980
2.8 Meot wlth Clty to Rovlow Comment8 $1,140 $140 s1,280 $1,280
2.9 lncorponte City and Agency Requlrement3 $'12,270 $560 $12,830 $12,830
2.10 obtaln caltrana Encnoachment Permlt ano
O(her Aoencv Aoorovals
$8,160 $580 $8,740 $8,740
2.11 Preoara 100% Plan3 rnd Soecllicatlons s26,880 $1,700 $28,580 $28,580
2.12 Prepare Final Plans (Bld Set)s14,670 01,1 80 $1 5,850 $1 5,850
2.'.t3 Proparc Estlmate of Ptobeble Constructlon $5,970 $270 $6,240 $6,240
2.11 Conduct Public H€arlng / PR Progr.m 09,000 $630 $9,630 $9,630
PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL $207.?80 $ 14,040 $ 24.725 s 5 750 *.ro 350 s 221 A20 3 252.6/ts
s 303.835 t 1s.345 (17 q50 (5 750 t to 150 t 323 t80 3 x77.230
mx+
H
@
H{
'g
o,(.o
(D
o-l!
o
7nsn$zffidr.21ftr CttyMffih D6ign
TA?AI DPACFI2'
CIry or Bu RLI NGAM E
MNNSTEU PUTUP STETION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 10
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE 1 -- ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE
The purpose of Phase I will be to define the project that shall be designed in subsequent
tasks. Our focus in defining the project will be to identi$ all existing conditions, and
select the optimum alternative for pump station and discharge pipeline for Marsten Pump
Station. During Task 1, the Winzler & Kelly design team will gather information and
input from the City in order to formulate recommendations for this project. The
components of the pumping system and related project issues to be evaluated include:. existing utilities. hydraulics and hydrology of the pump station,. plan and profile of wetwell, piping, and force main(s). pumpingrequirements,. existing electrical system capabilities and new pump power requirements,. coordination with PG&E. structural (seismic) requirements,. SCADA system improvements and requirements for compatibility,. cathodic protection,. existing right-of-way and easements, and. coordination with Caltrans for crossing Hwy. 101.
The following describes a detailed scope of work for each subtask.
1.1 Kickoff Meeting
A kickoff meeting will be conducted with City staffand key members of the design team
to discuss and review the project, establish design parameters, and to review the scope of
work, schedule and milestones for the project.
1.2 Prepare Project Work Plan
Winzler & Kelly will prepare a Project Work Plan to define all of the parameters for
executing the project. The Project Work Plan will outline the project team, schedule, and
deliverables for the project. lndividual responsibilities and task budgets will be included,
as will phone numbers, FAX numbers, and e-mail addresses for all project contacts.
1.3 Attend Coordination Meetings
Winzler & Kelly will assist the City with completing this project on time and within
budget. Key members of the project team will attend five (5) meetings with the City to
review progress, brainstorm concepts and review each of the progress submittals. It is
envisioned that the meetings would include representatives of the City's maintenance
staffduring the initial phase of the project, in order to get their input early in the process
so that features and requirements can be incorporated into the design.
1P2334138.004 s YH?|,',TsrSrkkY
CIry or BURLINGAME
ManSrEN Purrap STarIoN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 10
1.4 Review Existing Information
Winzler & Kelly will review existing documents and available information for relevant
data applicable to the project site. We will also conduct interviews with the City's
operations and maintenance staff in order to get an understanding of what is needed for
this project. Key members of the Project Team (civil engineer, mechanical engineer,
electrical and SCADA engineer, and structural engineer) will conduct a site investigation,
and review the existing system and all available documentation. The Project Team will
develop a list of questions and topics for discussion at a meeting with the City staff.
1.5 Develop Design Criteria
As a result of processing collected information, meetings and discussions with the City
staff, Winzler & Kelly will develop recommendations for design criteria to establish the
basis for subsequent design of the Marsten Pump Station and pipeline. Design criteria
will include such parameters as:. Design storm parameters (10-yr, 25-yr, Time of Concentration, etc.). Parameters for pumping (frequency limitations, capacity, type, etc.). Site Requirements (security, lighting, features). Pipeline parameters (material, velocity, minimum size, etc.). Control features (SCADA compatibility)
1.6 Review Hydraulics/Ilydrology
Winzler & Kelly will review existing evaluations performed by others for this project,
and consider and confirm the assumptions made. In addition, the surrounding hydrology
will be reviewed and evaluated to confirm and determine the anticipated flows to be
pumped. Also, the capacity of the creek will be evaluated to determine the best point for
pipeline discharge.
1.7 Evaluate Existing Site and Pipes
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the existing pump station site to determine the
best option for the new pump station. We will consider, as a minimum, four possible
locations for the pump station site. One option is upstream of the existing station, with a
new wetwell and intake area with screen and possibly reserve the existing station for dry
weather pumping. A second option is downstream of the existing station, with the same
concept possible of retaining the existing station for dry weather pumping. A third option
is to demolish the existing station and build the new pump station in its place, in the same
or similar footprint. A fourth option to consider is building the new pump station in
Easton Creek. We will also consider a submersible station versus a wetwell/dry well
configuration. The site will be evaluated for constraints and opportunities for the new
pump station.
The existing discharge pipes will be evaluated for the feasibility of reuse. One concept is
to use the discharge pipes (in reverse direction from current use) as intake for the new
pump station. Another option to be evaluated is for the existing discharge pipes to
remain as part of a dry weather discharge option.
2Y2334138.004 s yn+=,,*srn'L1T
CITy oT BURLINGAME
Mansreru Puup STRTION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 10
1.8 IdentifyAlignmentAlternatives
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the existing site to determine the optimum
alignment for the new discharge pipeline. The general alignment is from the existing
Marsten Pump Station, across Mills Creek and then roughly parallelling the creek, across
Highway 101, across Bayshore Boulevard, to a discharge point at a minimum of 100 feet
west of the San Francisco Bay. Alternative methods of construction willbe considered
for the creek crossings, and the Highway 101 and Bayshore Boulevard roadway
crossings. Tunneling and bore and jack are the likely candidates for this range of
diameter pipeline. We will use amatrix analysis to evaluate each alternative.
Altematives will be reviewed for many parameters including frrnctionality,
constructability, feasibility, and cost.
1.9 Evaluate Pump Station Type and Siting Alternatives
During this tash the Winzler & Kelly Team will evaluate the existing site to determine
the best location for the new pump station. Winzler & Kelly will review the existing
pump station site to determine thc constraints and opportunities for siting the new station.
The sites will be evaluated for requirements for drainage, security, accessibility and
landscaping. Pump station type (wet welUdry well versus submersible) will also be
evaluated. We will use a matrix analysis to evaluate each altemative. Alternatives will
be reviewed for many parameters including functionality, constructability, feasibility, and
cost.
1.10 Review Easement Requirements
Winzler & Kelly will review the land requirements for the proposed pump station and
pipeline. Potential easements (both permanent and temporary construction easements)
will be identified and reviewed with the City. The difEculty and cost of acquiring new
easements will be assessed as part of this task. Surveying for easements is not anticipated
during the Alternatives Analysis Phase. If requested, Winzler & Kelly can assist the City
with the easement acquisition process with surveying, preparation of plats and
descriptions, discussions with property owners, etc.
:. 1.11 Conduct Geotechnical Research.' This task will be accomplished with our specialized geotechnical subconsultant,
into two tasks: Research, and lnvestigationl]reparation of Report. This subtask involves
the geotechnical engineering research and evaluation to develop initial recommendations
for the project. DClWJoyal's engineers will review the geological setting, geologic
hazards, and develop preliminary geotechnical engineering parameters for the pump
station and pipeline. Published maps and reports will be reviewed, and a report will be
developed to summarize the research and include parameters such as foundation bearing
capacity, foundation settlement, lateral earth pressures, design groundwater elevation,
and UBC seismic parameters. During the design phase, under Subtask 2.2, field
investigation will be conducted.
3ny4138.004 s yn*n*srn'L\Y
CIry Or BURLINGAME
MaRsrErq PUrrap SrRrIOru UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 5 of 10
l.l2 Evaluate Soil Contamination Potential
Each of the alignment alternatives will be reviewed with respect to the potential for soil
and groundwater contamination impacts by completing an agency database search for
sites with environmental concems. The corridor study will include review of sites within
an approximately 1000-ft radius, and identifu areas of concern. Findings from
geotechnical investigations will also be incorporated into the assessment.
1.13 Coordinate with Caltrans and City Projects
\Minzler & Kelly will lead the effort for coordinating this project with Caltrans and
Caltrans improvement projects, and with other ongoing City projects (such as the
SCADA project, and the Hyatt Purnp Station project). We will coordinate with the City
to incorporate City standards for pump stations, and conduct reviews with City staffto
make sure that this project is well coordinated with other City projects.
l.l4 Conduct Predesign Charette
Winzler & Kelly will conduct a Predesign Charette involving all of the project
stakeholders. This session is intended as an interactive forum in which the pump station
concepts and alignment altematives can be reviewed and agreed upon. In this manner,
conflicts on the proposed configuration and alignment can be worked out prior to making
recommendations and proceeding with design. It is anticipated that the charette will
include representatives from the City engineering and maintenance staff, all of the
agencies and utilities involved, and key members of the Winzler & Kelly design team.
This approach has been successful in the past in establishing at an early date all of the
constraints to project design and conslruction, ensuring that all of the affected parties are
involved in formulating initial concepts of design alternatives.
1.15 Review Creek Crossings and End Connection
Winzler & Kelly will review options for crossing the creek, including review of the
alignment, method of constnrctiorl permitting, and special requirements for the crossing.
As part of this task, the design team will also evaluate options for the end connection
where the pipeline will discharge into the creek. Options for the pipeline discharge point
may involve design of a structure, or other special consideration for protection of the
creek.
1.16 Permit Assistance
Winzler & Kelly will provide assistance to the City in securing an Encroachment Permit
from Caltrans and a construction permit from the City of Burlingame. This task will
involve discussion, correspondence, meetings and design accommodations for
coordinating with Caltrans to coordinate Encroachment Permit and Caltrans' planned
improvement project for Highway 101. Additional permit assistance may be required for
other regulatory agencies such as Corps of Engineers, Fish & Game, etc. Permit
assistance may include participation in coordination meetings, responding to staff
questions, and revisions of the traffic control plans. Winzler & Kelly design team
members will prepare the permit applications.
4 coi6uLrlil6 EtacIIEEtsP2334138.004
wvrTv'7V
CITy OF BURLINGAME
MenSrEN Puup SrerIoN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 10
1.17 Prepare Estimates of Probable Construction Cost for Alternatives
For each of the alternatives analyzed in this phase, Winzler & Kelly will prepare
preliminary cost estimates to assist the City and the design team in the review of
altematives. Separate estimates of probable construction cost will be developed for each
of the pump station alternatives (new station, rehabilitated station; wet welVdry well,
submersible; new site, existing site; one station, two stations (wet weather and dry
weather flows). For the pipeline, separate cost estimates will be developed to assist in
comparison of alternatives and will reflect differences in alignment (length), construction
methods, size, material, etc. Cost will be included as one of the elements of the matrix
analysis referenced above.
1.18 Prepare Alternatives Analysis Report
Following the investigations and analysis of existing conditions described in the above
subtasks, the Winzler & Kelly Team will summarize the improvement alternatives,
evaluation and comparison of each alternative, and present recornmendations for pump
station and discharge pipeline in a Draft Altematives Analysis Report. The Team will
then meet with the City to review the Draft report. All comments will be addressed in a
Final Altematives Analysis Report. The Altematives Analysis Report will address the
following items:
o Demolition of existing facilities, (including the results of a hazardous materials
site assessment, if performed)
o Temporary facilities required for constructiono Preliminary structural design, including a pile-supported wet well if requiredo Site Improvements such as paving, fencing, inigation, water, and landscaping
requirements
o Preliminary mechanical design of the pumps, piping, and valveso Preliminary electrical design, including a single-line diagram, electrical
equipment, and emergency power recommendationso Preliminary instrumentation design, including a P&ID, identification and sizing of
instrumentation and control equipment, and telemetry points to be monitoredo Preliminary identification of property acquisition requirements, if requiredo A Preliminary Estimate of Probable Construction Costso Manufacturer's literature for the major equipment items.
Deliverables for this task will include:r J copies of a Draft Alternatives Analysis Report. l0 copies of a Final Alternatives Analysis Report. electronic copy of the Final Alternatives Analysis Report.
PHASE2-DESIGNPHASE
Following approval of the Final Alternatives Analysis Report, the Winzler & Kelly
Team will proceed with the design of the project. This phase will be approached in
accordance with the tasks outlined in the City's RFP. We will prepare plans,
specifications, estimates and preliminary constructio"'S'$r*HJl=llgl*
P2334138.004 5 te- coxeu.rrilc En.rn€GRs
Crrv or Bu RL! NGAM E
MRRSreru Punap STarIoN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 10
discharge piping, and associated facilities. We will produce progress submittals for the
City's review and comment at 50yo, 90yo and 100% completion stages. For each
progress submittal, Winzler & Kelly will provide 5 sets of documents for the City's
review. The final design will be provided as one hard copy set and one electronic file
(emailed to City), and two Zip disk copies.
Specific tasks within the Design Phase include survey, geotechnical investigation, right-
of-way investigation and property acquisition, assistance at Public meetings to resolve
citizen's concerns, and coordination and meetings with the City staff and Caltrans to
review progress and resolve project design issues. The following describes a detailed
scope of work for each subtask.
2.1 Conduct Surveys and Mapping
Winzler & Kelly will manage and coordinate the aerial mapping and topographic survey
work. The City's existing topography will be used as much as possible. For select areas
of the project, it is anticipated that the existing survey will need to be supplemented with
field data. A base map will be prepared covering the project area, ata scale of 1":40'.
The survey will show street right-of-ways, existing improvements within the right-of-way
(such as curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, light poles, utility poles, traffic signal poles,
fire hydrants, water valves, water meters, manholes, storm water inlets, utility boxes,
monuments, gs valves, transformers, and other visible features), select spot elevations,
contour intervals (each foot), and tree outlines. Rim and invert elevations for all sanitary
sewer manholes and storm drain manholes and inlets along the route will be included.
The survey will have a grid showing California State Plan Coordinates Zone 3 NAD 1927
with horizontal control points labeled as appropriate. Elevations will be in accordance
with the City of Burlingame Datum, with vertical control points appropriately labeled.
2.2 ConductGeotechnicallnvestigation/Report
Following the geologic research and geotechnical investigation performed as a part of
Subtask I .1 l, , and considering recommendations for the pump station location, pipeline
alignment, and construction methods, a subsurface investigation will be performed under
this task. Test borings for the subsurface investigation will include conventional auger
drillings, located approximately every 500 linear feet along the pipeline alignment and up
to 25 feet in depth. It is anticipated that approximately four soil borings will be made and
samples taken for testing to determine the soil parameters. The results of the
investigation will be evaluated and final recommendations for the design will be
developed. Design input will include recommendations for trench design, foundation
design, tunneling pit parameters, groundwater control, and bedding and backfill material
recommendations.
Laboratory testing will include moisture content, unit weight, Atterberg Limits, grain-size
distribution, unconfined compressive strength of the soil, unconfined compressive
strength of cobbles and boulders, the Cerchar Abrasivity Index for the cobbles and
6 cox6utTlIG EI0|frEER6P2334138.@4 w
Crry or BURLTNGAME
MENSTEN PUTUP STA-rION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 8 of 10
boulders, direct shear, and corrosivity. The data from the geologic and geotechnical
research, the subsurface investigation, and the laboratory testing will be analyzed with
respect to anticipated construction alternatives, excavation stability, groundwater
dewatering requirements, pipeline bedding, and trench backfill. Design parameters
including design groundwater levels, lateral earth pressures, pipe support, vertical pipe
loading, foundation bearing capacity, and level of seismic shahng will be documented in
a geotechnical investigation report.
Five copies of the draft geotechnical report will be provided for the District's review and
comment. Five copies of the final geotechnical report will be provided.
2.3 Assist with Environmental (CEQA)
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the requirements for CEQA documentation for
the project. Winzler & Kelly will provide needed support such as description of project
and preparation of environmental documents. It is envisioned that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be required for this project. Winzler & Kelly will prepare the required
documentation and assist the City with the approval process, including filing of a Notice
of Intent, completing a study, and submitting a Prelimimary document to the State
Clearinghouse for circulation. This proposal is based on preparation of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and does not include services to prepare a fulI Environmental
Impact Report. If additional specialty studies are required, these services will be
included in a separate proposal.
2.4 Attend Agency Coordination Meetings
Winzler & Kelly will attend up to l0 coordination meetings with agencies for review and
approval of the proposed project. It is envisioned that several meetings will be required
with Caltrans to coordinate with their improvement project and to review the details
required for an Encroachment Permit. Additional meetings are envisioned to be needed
for other agencies with jurisdiction including Corps of Engineers, City of Burlingame,
San Mateo County, etc.
2.5 Prepare 507o Plans and Specifications
Winzler & Kelly will prepare the 50% design submittal, including all utility location
work, the finalized pipeline alignments, construction methodologies for each reach of
sewer, and the easement, right-of-way, and encroachment needs. The recommendations
of the geotechnical report will be addressed. For the pump station, The Team will select
replacement pumps, determine the pump configuration, and design the system piping and
valving in conformance with City standards and for simplification of operation and
maintenance. Pump station controls will also be designed and located on the site. The
Team will evaluate the existing electrical system, including the reliability of power
supply, compatibility with current standards for electrical supply and PG&E's required
improvements, and accommodations for the station's telemetry and SCADA equipment.
Provisions for a generator and integral load bank will be included.
7P2334138.004
w'Iti/
coNSuLttx6
EXHIBIT A, Page 9 of 10
Winzler & Kelly will use Miller Pipeline to perform utility locating work. The exact
scope of work will be developed once the alignment is determined, and the pump station
alternative is selected.
2.6 Meet with City to Review 507o Comments
Once the City has reviewed the 50%o submittal, key members of the Winzler & Kelly
design team will meet with the City to review comments and critical items that need to be
incorporated into the subsequent design stages.
Winzler & Kelly will revise the plans and specifications as necessary to address all
comments received during the 50Yo review period. Comments received from external
agencies will be coordinated with the City prior to incorporation.
2.7 Prepare 907o Plans and Specifications
Winzler & Kelly will prepare the 90% design submiftal for the City. This submittal will
include all technical specification sections, the complete set of detail drawings, all
general sheets, civil, mechanical, structural and electrical pump station plans and details,
pipeline plan and profile drawings, connection and structure details, all permits, rights of
entry, staging areas, and other easement issues, and all utility information.
Winzler & Kelly will develop separate traffic control sheets to be incorporated into the
drawing set as part of the Contract Documents. Winzler & Kelly will coordinate with the
City of Burlingame and Caltrans to ensure that the traffic control plans meet the standards
of the permiuing agencies. For the portions of the work within the Caltrans right-of-way,
plans will be prepared with dual units (both imperial and metric).
The estimate of probable construction cost (to t l0%) and the construction schedule will
be refined. All design review comments from the City will be addressed and
incorporated. As a check of the accuracy of the utility information shown, the 90Yo
submittal will be provided to each utility for final comments.
2.8 Meetwith City to Review 907o Comments
Key members of the Winzler & Kelly project team will attend a review meeting, to be
convened by the City, to discuss the comments of the City relative to the 90% submittal.
During this meeting, comments will be discussed as necessary and a method of resolution
willbe agreed upon.
2.9 Incorporate Cify and Agency Requirements
Winzler & Kelly will revise the plans and specifications as necessary to address all
comments received during the 90oh submittal review period. Comments received from
extemal agencies will be coordinated with the City prior to incorporation. As part of this
task, final permit conditions will be incorporated into the documents.
IP2334138.004 s yn+**srsFr.kY
CITy OF BURLINGAME
MaRSTEN PUMP STATION UPGRADE
CIry Or BURLTNGAME
ManSrEN PUNAP STATION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 10 of 10
2.10 Obtain Caltrans Encroachment Permit and Other Agency Approvals
Winzler & Kelly will provide assistance to the City in securing approvals from all
agencies having jurisdiction over this project. Agency approvals are anticipated to be
needed from City of Burlingame, Caltrans, Corps of Engineers, State Water Resource
Control Board (Stormwater Permit), and possibly others such as the Dept. of Fish &
Game, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, etc. Assistance may include participation in
coordination meetings, responding to staffquestions, and revisions of the plans to
incorporate requirements. Winzler & Kelly design team members will prepare the permit
applications and lead the coordination effort with all agencies with jurisdiction over this
project.
2.ll Prepare l00oh Plans and Specifications
Winzler f,6 fefly will incorporate each of the comments of the City and external agencies,
as agreed to during the review meeting, into the 100% Contract Documents. A final
lOO% design submiual including all Contract Documents will be prepared and submiffed
to the City for review and approval to prepare documents for bidding.
2.12 Prepare Final Plans @id Set)
A Bid-ready set of the Contract Documents and the Geotechnical Report will be provided
to the City for reproduction and bidding. The final bid set will include all required
signatures, have required permits and project construction requirements included as
appendices, and provide bidding forms for the contractor's bid. In addition, the
specifications and geotechnical report will be provided electronically to the City.
2.13 Prepare Estimate of Probable Construction Cost
For each submittal, Winzler & Kelly will prepare estimates of the probable construction
cost with contingencies to reflect the state of development of the design. At the 100%
stage, a final cost estimate for the project will be prepared, to be used as the Engineer's
Estimate during bidding of the project.
2.14 Conduct Public Hearing / Public Relations Program
Winzler & Kelly will assist the District in conducting a public meeting for the project.
Assistance will include providing appropriate community notification, preparing and
delivering a formal presentation, and responding to questions from the public. The goal
of the public hearing will be to concurrently meet the requirements of the CEQA process,
to inform the community of the construction plans, and to receive input from the public.
Additional requirements for a public outreach progrcm will be included in the design
documents. These requirements will place responsibihff for notification of the public
prior to and during construction on the contractor. Elements of the public outreach
progrnm may include erection of construction signs, mailing of written notices, monthly
newsletters, and other means.
IP2334138.004 s yn*x*srn'L\{
A.
B.
THIS AGREEMENT is entered intothis day of
2OO2, by and between the City of Burling€une, State of California, herein called the
"City", and WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGINEERS., engaged in providing
PROI'ESSIONALENGII{EERING consulting services herein calledthe "Consultant".
RECITALS
The City is considering undertaking activities to per{orm engineering services.
The City desires to engage a Professional Engineering Consultant to provide
consulting services in conjunction with the engineering design, preparation of
plans & specifications, contract documents for the Marsten Storm Drain Pump Station
and Outfall Pipeline, CP 80520, because of Consultant's experience and
qualifications to perform the desired work.
C The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to
perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide all services as set forth in
Exhibit A of this Agreement.
Time ofPerformance. The services ofthe Consultant are to conunence upon
the execution of ttris Agreement with completion on or about September
2002.
Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable
laws, codes, ordinances, andregulations ofgoverning federal, state and local
laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses,
permits, qualifications and approvals ofwhatsoever nature which are legally
required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and
warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in
effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses,
permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice
its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business
license.
Revised: July25,2O02 Page I Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
2
3
AGREEMENT FOR PROI'ESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
CONST]LTANT SERYICES
4.
5.
Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or
engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the
City and all reports and supportive dataprepared by the Consultant underthis
Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the
completion of Consultant's seryices or at the City's written request. All
reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant
in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement
are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant
shall not make any of the these documents or information available to any
individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without
the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges
that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement
are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and Crty's use of the
information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection
with other projects shall be solely at Cit5r's risk, unless Consultant expressly
consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it witl not appropriate
any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been
confrrmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant.
Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not
exceed $377,230.00; and payment shall be based upon Crty approval of each
task.
Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation ofthe work performed
by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications,
documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review,
even if only in partial or draft form.
AvailabiliW of Records. Consultant shatl maintain the records supporting
this billing fornot less thanthree (3) years following completion ofthe *ork
under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to
authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business
hours upon written request of the City.
Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under
this Agreement shall be Elizabeth Hirschhorn.
Assignabilitv and Subcontractins. The services to be performed under this
Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these
services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent ofthe
City.
6
8.
9.
Revised: July25,2O02 Page 2 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BuRLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
7.
10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and
properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to:
To City:Syed Murtuza,, City Engineer
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94OlO
To Consultant:Winzler & I(elly Consulting Engineers
417 Montgomery Street, Ste 60O
San Francisco, CA 94104 - 2704
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address
as Consultant designates in writing to City.
11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the
performance ofthe work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and
be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As
an independent contractor helshe shall not obtain any rights to retirement
benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior
written consent, the Consultant may perforrn some obligations under this
Agreement by subcontractirg, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility
for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement.
Consultant agrees to testiff in any litigation brought regarding the subject of
the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be
compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, taveling to, and
testi$ing in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation,
unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of
Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing.
12.Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional
responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain
any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no
business holdings or agreements with any individual member ofthe Staff or
management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such
holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not
presently and shall not acquire zrny direct or indirect interest adverse to those
of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately
disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and
shall, at the Crt5r's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant
shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not
employ a person having such an interest in this perforrnance of this
Revised: J11y25,2002 Page 3 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has
employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with
its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notifr City of
this employment relationship, and shall, at the Crt5r's sole discretion, sever
any such employment relationship.
13. Equal Employment Opportunitv. Consultant warrants that it is an equal
opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing
equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do
and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking
employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, tace, marital status,
sexual orientation, ancestlr, physical or mental disabiligr, national origin,
religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act.
14. Insurance.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance:
t.Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/trer
and his/trer firm to an amount not less than: one million dollars
($1,00O,00O) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injrty and property damage.
Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the
contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring
him/her and his/trer staffto an amount not less ttran one million
dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
111 Consultant shall provide to the City all certificates of insurance,
with original endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant
agrees that all certificates and endorsements are to be received
and approved by the City before work commences.
iv Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than
$1,000,000 which is sufficient to insure Consultant for
professional errors or omissions in the performance of the
particular scope of work under this agreement.
Revised: J11y25,2002 Page 4 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
ii.
B. General Liability:
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf ofthe Consultant; products
and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or
used by the Consultant. This requirement does not apply to the
professional liability insurance required for professional errors
and omissions.
ll.The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance
as respects the City, its officers, ofFrcials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances maintained by the
City, its offrcers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be
excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
iii.Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affbct coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
lv The Consultanfs insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
C All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except afterthirty (30) days'
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been
given to the City. current certification of such insurance shall be kept
on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City
Clerk.
D.In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain
Workers'Compensation insurance as required by California law and
shall provide evidence of such policy to the City before beginning
services under this Agreement. Further, Consultant shall ensure that
all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required
Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees.
Indemnification. The Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless
indemnify and defend the City its offrcers, agent, employees and volunteers
from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equiQr that
t.
15.
Revised: Ju1y25,2002 Page 5 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAMEMy Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
may at any time arise or be set up because of damages to propergr or personal
injury received by reason of or in the course ofperforming work which may
be occasioned by a willful or negligent act or omissions ofthe Consultant, or
any of the Consultant's offrcers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant.
16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either parfy to exercise any right or remedy
hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party
may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this
Agreement constitute a continuing waiver ofa subsequent breach ofthe surme
or any other provision of this Agreement.
17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be
governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for
any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior or Municipal
Court of the County of San Mateo or Santa Clara.
18 Termination ofAsreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right
to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than
frfteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination,
the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports,
performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City
shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum
contract price as ttre work delivered to the City bears to completed services
contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for
cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light ofthe
particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination.
19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment
of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City
and the Consultant.
20 Disputes. In any dispute over.rr| u.p."t of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, as well as costs not to
exceed $7,500 in total.
21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms,
conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modiff or vary this
Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be
bound, shall be binding on either party.
Revised: Ju1y25,2002 Page 6 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dbell.BURLINGAME\Ir,{y Documents\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this
Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1).
City of Burlingame
City Manager Consultant: Winzler and I(elly
Consulting Engineers
City of Burlingame
Print Name
Title
ATTEST:Approved as to form:
City Clerk City Attorney
Revised: Jt1y25,2002 Page 7 Of 7
C:\Documents and Settings\dmortensen.BtlRllNGAME\Local Settings\Temp\80520WKelly.ConAgreeJul02.wpd
CIW OF BURL]NGAME
MARSTEN PUMP STATION PROJECT
FEE PROPOSAL
ALTERNAT]VES ANALYSIS AND DESIGN PHASES
W&K Tot l
L!bor
o
Eoa
d
6-'o6.=o+<o
OrOdo
=f
UiL.co6P9 c<o6
E5Eooo
c;
oo
'ac
tr.lc>oo9aO=26
w&K Total
(Labor +
Ex06nsesl TOTAL
ASK DESCRIPTION
,tI Proloct Klckoff Mo.tlno s2.010 $120 $2.130 32.130
.2 s1.510 $80 $'t.570 3't.570
t.3 Attand C@rdlnatlon Mmtlnos (5'l $6.025 $375 $6.400 36.400.t s6 oao E330 $7.310 s7.3't0
-5 ,evaloo Derlon Crlte.la $6.280 3250 t6.530 $6.530.l-6 37 A30 $330 $7.960 $7.960
1-7 32.7?.0 31 10 s2.830 32.830
1.8 3A MO t3'to $6.050 $6.650
t.9 37 950 3380 $8.330 38.330
1.10 t2 2AO s16()s2.390 s2.390
1.11 Conduct Geotechnlcal Rasosrch $1,340 s60 t12,650 $1,400 $14,050
1-12 valu.tG Soll Cont mlnrtlon Potentlrl 33 6rX)s26n s3.860 s3.860
,-r1 Cmrdlnrte wrcehmnr & Cltv Pmlmt!37 l/to s/tOO $7,5/10 s7.540
1-11 Conduct Pred6lon Charette s6 E10 Slao 3575 J7.120 $7.995
't.15 Rcvlcw Cr!.k Cro.3lng. rnd End
Connmtlon
$5,920 s300 $6,220 t8,220
t.l6 s5 820 s3ro 95.930 s5.930
1.'lt
Conrtrucllon Corl lor Altemrtlvet
$3,560 9160 $3,720 E3,720
l.t8 31 2 260 39tO 313.170 s13.170
PHASE I SUBTOTAL s 96 055 S 5.305 s 13 225 s 3 s 101 360 t {14 585
. DESIGN PHASE
2.1 Conduct Suwoyt !nd [/lrpplno s1.720 s1,280 s5,7s0 s10,350 s3,000 $19,100
2.2 Conduct Gootochnlc.l lnvo3liOatlon/Roport s960 $140 $24,725 $1,100 $25,825
2.3 Asslrt wtth Envlronmontal (CEQA)$9,820 s960 310.780 $'t0.780
2.1 Att.nd Aqcncy Coordlnation Mrotins3 (10)$3,680 $390 $4.070 E4,070
2.5 PreDara 50% Plani and Soecmcatloni 963,120 $3,3,10 966,460 $66,460
2.6 Mect wlth Cltv to Revlaw Comment3 $1,140 $140 $1,280 01,280
2.7 Preoarc 90% Plenr rnd SoecHicrtlons 949,250 $2,730 $51,980 $51,980
2.E M*t wlth Cltv to Revlew Commantr $1,1 40 il40 $1,280 $1,280
2.9 lncomnte Citv rnd Aoencv Rsulnmentt $12,270 $560 $12,830 $12,830
2.10 omatn ca[ren3 Enctotcnmant Permlt and
Olhar Aocncv Aoorovals
$8.160 $580 $8,740 $8,740
2.11 Prooa?e'lo0% Planr and Soeclflcatlons $26,880 01,700 $28,580 $28,580
2.12 Preoare Flnal Pl.ns (Bld Sotl $14,670 $1,180 $1 s,850 $15.850
2.13 Preoare E3tlmate of Prcbrble Constructlon $5,970 $270 $6,240 i6,240
2.11 Conduct Public Hclrlnq / PR Prosram $9,000 t630 09,630 $9,630
PHASE 2 S1IBTOTAL s 207 7AO s 14.0/lO s 2A725 $ 5.750 $ t0.350 $ 221.820 3 262.845
TOTAL PHASE .I & 2 s 303 835 3 rE 345 3 37 E50 t 3 750 t lo 13n t 12:t lao 3 477 )an
rrtx-
CD
--.1
.E
OJ(.o
(D
FT
o
-}r
O
1n5n002@a?.21for CityMda D6ign
amll Aaalalrnea
CITy OF BURLINGAME
MRnSrex PuTup SrertoN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 10
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE 1 -- ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE
The purpose of Phase I will be to define the project that shall be designed in subsequent
tasks. Our focus in defining the project will be to identiff all existing conditions, and
select the optimum alternative for pump station and discharge pipeline for Marsten Pump
Station. During Task l, the Winzler & Kelly design team will gather information and
input from the City in order to formulate recommendations for this project. The
components of the pumping system and related project issues to be evaluated include:. existing utilities. hydraulics and hydrology of the pump station,. plan and profile of wetwell, piping, and force main(s). pumping requirements,. existing electrical system capabilities and new pump power requirements,. coordination with PG&E. structural (seismic) requirements,. SCADA system improvements and requirements for compatibility,. cathodic protection,. existing right-of-way and easements, and. coordination with Caltrans for crossing Hwy. 101.
The following describes a detailed scope of work for each subtask.
1.1 KickoffMeeting
A kickoff meeting will be conducted with City staffand key members of the design team
to discuss and review the project, establish design parameters, and to review the scope of
work, schedule and milestones for the project.
1.2 Prepare Project Work Plan
Winzler & Kelly will prepare a Project Work Plan to define all of the parameters for
executing the project. The Project Work Plan will outline the project team, schedule, and
deliverables for the project. Individual responsibilities and task budgets will be included,
as will phone numbers, FAX numbers, and e-mail addresses for all project contacts.
1.3 Attend Coordination Meetings
Winzler & Kelly will assist the City with completing this project on time and within
budget. Key members of the project team will attend five (5) meetings with the City to
review progress, brainstorm concepts and review each of the progress submittals. It is
envisioned that the meetings would include representatives of the City's maintenance
staff during the initial phase of the project, in order to get their input early in the process
so that features and requirements can be incorporated into the design.
1P2334138.004 w coxsultrtt c ENct tiE Eis
CITy OF BURLINGAME
MansrEnu Purrap SrarroN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 10
1.4 Review Existing Information
Winzler & Kelly will review existing documents and available information for relevant
data applicable to the project site. We will also conduct interviews with the City's
operations and maintenance staff in order to get an trnderstanding of what is needed for
this project. Key members of the Project Team (civil engineer, mechanical engineer,
electrical and SCADA engineer, and structural engineer) will conduct a site investigation,
and review the existing system and all available documentation. The Project Team will
develop a list of questions and topics for discussion at a meeting with the City staff.
1.5 Develop Design Criteria
As a result of processing collected information, meetings and discussions with the City
staff, Winzler & Kelly will develop recornmendations for design criteria to establish the
basis for subsequent design of the Marsten Pump Station and pipeline. Design criteria
will include such parameters as:. Design storm parameters (10-yr, 25-yr, Time of Concentration, etc.). Parametersforpumping(frequencylimitations,capacity,type, etc.). SiteRequirements(security,lighting,features). Pipeline parameters (material, velocity, minimum size, etc.). Control features (SCADA compatibility)
1.6 Review Hydraulics/Ilydrolory
Winzler & Kelly will review existing evaluations performed by others for this project,
and consider and confirm the assumptions made. In addition, the surrounding hydrology
will be reviewed and evaluated to confirm and determine the anticipated flows to be
pumped. Also, the capacity of the creek will be evaluated to determine the best point for
pipeline discharge.
1.7 Evaluate Existing Site and Pipes
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the existing pump station site to deterrnine the
best option for the new pump station. We will consider, as a minimum, four possible
locations for the pump station site. One option is upstream of the existing station, with a
new wetwell and intake area with screen and possibly reserve the existing station for dry
weather pumping. A second option is downstream of the existing station, with the same
concept possible of retaining the existing station for dry weather pumping. A third option
is to demolish the existing station and build the new pump station in its place, in the same
or similar footprint. A fourth option to consider is building the new pump station in
Easton Creek. We will also consider a submersible station versus a wetwell/dry well
configuration. The site will be evaluated for constraints and opportunities for the new
pump station.
The existing discharge pipes will be evaluated for the feasibility of reuse. One concept is
to use the discharge pipes (in reverse direction from cument use) as intake for the new
pump station. Another option to be evaluated is for the existing discharge pipes to
remain as part of a dry weather discharge option.
2 co{0uLrril6 E{6'XEEr3P2334138.004
vvw\57
CIry or BURLINGAME
MnRsreru Puup Srarloru UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 10
1.8 IdentifyAlignmentAlternatives
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the existing site to determine the optimum
alignment for the new discharge pipeline. The general alignment is from the existing
Marsten Purnp Station, across Mills Creek and then roughly parallelling the creek, across
Highway l0l, across Bayshore Boulevard, to a discharge point at a minimum of 100 feet
west of the San Francisco Bay. Alternative methods of construction will be considered
for the creek crossings, and the Highway l0l and Bayshore Boulevard roadway
crossings. Tunneling and bore and jack are the likely candidates for this range of
diameter pipeline. We will use a mafrix analysis to evaluate each alternative.
Altematives will be reviewed for many parameters including functionality,
constructability, feasibility, and cost.
1.9 Evaluate Pump Station Type and Siting Alternatives
During this task, the Winzler & Kelly Team will evaluate the existing site to determine
the best location for the new pump station. Winzler & Kelly will review the existing
pump station site to determine the constraints and opportunities foi siting the new station.
The sites will be evaluated for requirements for drainage, security, accessibility and
landscaping. Pump station type (wet welUdry well versus submersible) will also be
evaluated. We will use a matrix analysis to evaluate each alternative. Altematives will
be reviewed for many parameters including functionality, constructability, feasibility, and
cost.
1.10 Review Easement Requirements
Winzler & Kelly will review the land requirements for the proposed purnp station and
pipeline. Potential easements (both permanent and temporary construction easements)
will be identified and reviewed with the City. The diffrculty and cost of acquiring new
easements will be assessed as part of this task. Surveying for easements is not anticipated
during the Alternatives Analysis Phase. If requested, Winzler & Kelly can assist the City
with the easement acquisition process with surveying, preparation of plats and
descriptions, discussions with property owners, etc.
:r, 1.11 Conduct Geotechnical Research
This task witl be accomplished with our specialized geotechnical subconsultant,
into two tasks: Research, and lnvestigationl?reparation of Report. This subtask involves
the geotechnical engineering research and evaluation to develop initial recommendations
for the project. DClWJoyal's engineers will review the geological setting, geologic
hazards, and develop preliminary geotechnical engineering parameters for the pump
station and pipeline. Published maps and reports will be reviewed, and a report will be
developed to summarize the research and include parameters such as foundation bearing
capacity, foundation settlement, lateral earth pressures, design groundwater elevation,
and UBC seismic parameters. During the design phase, under Subtask 2.2, field
investigation will be conducted.
3 cox6uLTlxGP2334138.004
v'7w\(F7
CIrv Or BuRLINGAME
MaRsten Punap SrarroN UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 5 of 10
1,.12 Evaluate Soil Contamination Potential
Each of the alignment alternatives will be reviewed with respect to the potential for soil
and groundwater contamination impacts by completing an agency database search for
sites with environmental concerns. The corridor study will include review of sites within
an approximately 1000-ft radius, and identifr areas of concern. Findings from
geotechnical investigations will also be incorporated into the assessment.
1.13 Coordinatewith Caltrans and City Projects
Winzler & Kelly will lead the effort forcoordinating this project with Caltrans and
Caltrans improvement projects, and with other ongoing City projects (such as the
SCADA project, and the Hyatt Purnp Station project). We will coordinate with the City
to incorporate City standards for pump stations, and conduct reviews with City staff to
make sure that this project is well coordinated with other City projects.
l.l4 Conduct Predesign Charette
Winzler & Kelly will conduct a Predesign Charette involving all of the project
stakeholders. This session is intended as an interactive forum in which the pump station
concepts and alignment alternatives can be reviewed and agreed upon. In this manner,
conflicts on the proposed configuration and alignment can be worked out prior to making
recommendations and proceeding with design. It is anticipated that the charette will
include representatives from the City engineering and maintenance staff, all of the
agencies and utilities involved, and key members of the Winzler & Kelly design team.
This approach has been successful in the past in establishing at an early date all of the
constaints to project design and conslruction, ensuring that all of the affected parties are
involved in formulating initial concepts of design alternatives.
1.15 Review Creek Crossings and End Connection
Winzler & Kelly will review options for crossing the creek, including review of the
alignment, method of construction, permitting, and special requirements for the crossing.
As part of this task, the design team will also evaluate options for the end connection
where the pipeline will discharge inlo the creek. Options for the pipeline discharge point
may involve design of a structure, or other special consideration for protection of the
creek.
1.16 Permit Assistance
Winzler & Kelly will provide assistance to the City in securing an Encroachment Permit
from Caltrans and a construction permit from the City of Burlingame. This task will
involve discussion, correspondence, meetings and design accommodations for
coordinating with Caltrans to coordinate Encroachment Permit and Caltrans' plarured
improvement project for Highway 101. Additional permit assistance may be required for
other regulatory agencies such as Corps of Engineers, Fish & Game, etc. Permit
assistance may include participation in coordination meetings, responding to staff
questions, and revisions of the traJfic control plans. Winzler & Kelly design team
members will prepare the permit applications.
4P2334138.004 s xxrrr,+€rsFr.kr
CIry Or BURLINGAME
MnRsreru Purup STRTION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 10
1,17 Prepare Estimates of Probable Construction Cost for Alternatives
For each of the altematives analyzed in this phase, Winzler & Kelly will prepare
preliminary cost estimates to assist the City and the design team in the review of
alternatives. Separate estimates of probable construction cost will be developed for each
of the pump station alternatives (new station, rehabilitated station; wet welUdry well,
submersible; new site, existing site; one statiorL two stations (wet weather and dry
weather flows). For the pipeline, separate cost estimates will be developed to assist in
comparison of alternatives and will reflect differences in alignment (length), construction
methods, size, material, etc. Cost will be included as one of the elements of the matrix
analysis referenced above.
1.18 Prepare Alternatives Analysis Report
Following the investigations and analysis of existing conditions described in the above
subtasks, the Winzler & Kelly Team will summarize the improvement alternatives,
evaluation and comparison of each alternative, and present recommendations for pump
station and discharge pipeline in a Draft Alternatives Analysis Report. The Team will
then meet with the Cfu to review the Draft report. All comments will be addressed in a
Final Altematives Analysis Report. The Alternatives Analysis Report will address the
following items:
o Demolition of existing facilities, (including the results of a hazardous materials
site assessment, if performed)
r Temporary facilities required for construction
o Preliminary structural design, including a pile-supported wet well if required
o Site Improvements such as paving, fencing, irrigation, water, and landscaping
requirements
o Preliminary mechanical design of the pumps, piping, and valves
o Preliminary electrical design, including a single-line diagram, electrical
equipment, and emergency power recommendations
o Preliminary instrumentation design, including a P&ID, identification and sizing of
instrumentation and control equipment, and telemetry points to be monitored
o Preliminary identification of property acquisition requirements, if required
o A Preliminary Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
o Manufacturer's literature for the major equipment items.
Deliverables for this task will include:o J copies of a Draft Alternatives Analysis Report. l0 copies of a Final Alternatives Analysis Report. electronic copy of the Final Altematives Analysis Report.
PHASE2_DESIGNPHASE
Following approval of the Final Alternatives Analysis Report, the Winzler & Kelly
Team will proceed with the design of the project. This phase will be approached in
accordance with the tasks outlined in the City's RFP. We will prepme plans,
specifications, estimates and preliminary construction schedules for the pump station,
5P2334138.004
\7Vlvw
'7YVw coxsuLilxG €t6txE€(s
CIry Or BURLINGAME
MARSTEN PUTUP STRTION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 10
discharge piping, and associated facilities. We will produce progress submittals for the
City's review and comment at 50Yo, 90Yo and 100% completion stages. For each
progress submittal, Winzler & Kelly will provide 5 sets of documents for the City's
review. The final design will be provided as one hard copy set and one electronic file
(emailed to City), and two Zip disk copies.
Specific tasks within the Design Phase include suryey, geotechnical investigation, right-
of-way investigation and property acquisition, assistance at Public meetings to resolve
citizen's concerns, and coordination and meetings with the City staff and Caltrans to
review progress and resolve project design issues. The following describes a detailed
scope of work for each subtask.
2.1 Conduct Surveys and Mapping
Winzler & Kelly will manage and coordinate the aerial mapping and topographic survey
work. The City's existing topography will be used as much as possible. For select areas
of the project, it is anticipated that the existing survey will need to be supplemented with
field data. A base map will be prepared covering the project areao ata scale of l":40'.
The survey will show sfreet right-of-ways, existing improvements within the right-of-way
(such as curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, light poles, utility poles, traffic signal poles,
fire hydrants, water valves, water meters, manholes, storm water inlets, utility boxes,
monuments, gff valves, transformers, and other visible features), select spot elevations,
contour intervals (each foot), and tree outlines. Rim and invert elevations for all sanitary
sewer manholes and storm drain manholes and inlets along the route will be included.
The survey will have a grid showing California State Plan Coordinates Zone 3 NAD 1927
with horizontal control points labeled as appropriate. Elevations will be in accordance
with the City of Burlingame Datum, with vertical control points appropriately labeled.
2.2 ConductGeotechnicallnvestigation/Report
Following the geologic research and geotechnical investigation performed as a part of
Subtask l.l l, , and considering recommendations for the pump station location, pipeline
alignment, and construction methods, a subsurface investigation will be performed under
this task. Test borings for the subsurface investigation will include conventional auger
drillings, located approximately every 500 linear feet along the pipeline alignment and up
to 25 feet in depth. It is anticipated that approximately four soil borings will be made and
samples taken for testing to determine the soil parameters. The results of the
investigation will be evaluated and final recommendations for the design will be
developed. Design input will include recommendations for trench design, foundation
design, tunneling pit parameters, groundwater control, and bedding and backfill material
recommendations.
Laboratory testing will include moisture content, unit weight, Atterberg Limits, grain-size
distribution, unconfrned compressive strength of the soil, unconfined compressive
strength of cobbles and boulders, the Cerchar Abrasivity Index for the cobbles and
6P2334138.004 $ .wz-rxrzr*e,n sfntLky
CIry or Bu RLI NGAM E
MansreN Purrap Srerrou UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 8 of 10
boulders, direct shear, and corrosivity. The data from the geologic and geotechnical
research, the subsurface investigation, and the laboratory testing will be analyzed with
respect to anticipated construction alternatives, excavation stability, groundwater
dewatering requirements, pipeline bedding, and trench backfill. Design parameters
including design grotrndwater levels,lateral earth pressures, pipe support, vertical pipe
loading, foundation bearing capacity, and level of seismic shaking will be documented in
a geotechnical investigation report.
Five copies of the draft geotechnical report will be provided for the District's review and
comment. Five copies ofthe final geotechnical report will be provided.
2.3 Assist with Environmental (CEQA)
Winzler & Kelly will review and evaluate the requirements for CEQA documentation for
the project. Winzler & Kelly will provide needed support such as description of project
and preparation of environmental documents. It is envisioned that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be required for this project. Winzler & Kelly will prepare the required
documentation and assist the City with the approval process, including filing of aNotice
of Intent, completing a study, and submitting a Prelimimary document to the State
Clearinghouse for circulation. This proposal is based on preparation of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration and does not include services to prepare a full Environmental
Impact Report. If additional specialty studies are required, these services will be
included in a separate proposal.
2.4 Attend Agency Coordination Meetings
Winzler & Kelly will attend up to 10 coordination meetings with agencies for review and
approval of the proposed project. It is envisioned that several meetings will be required
with Caltrans to coordinate with their improvement project and to review the details
required for an Encroachment Permit. Additional meetings are envisioned to be needed
for other agencies withjurisdiction including Corps of Engineers, City of Burlingame,
San Mateo County, etc.
2.5 Prepare 507o Plans and Specifications
Winzler & Kelly will prepare the 50o/o design submittal, including all utility location
work, the ftnalized pipeline alignments, construction methodologies for each reach of
sewer, and the easement, righrof-way, and encroachment needs. The recommendations
of the geotechnical report will be addressed. For the pump station, The Team will select
replacement pumps, determine the pump configuration, and design the system piping and
valving in conformance with City standards and for simplification of operation and
maintenance. Pump station controls will also be designed and located on the site. The
Team will evaluate the existing electrical system, including the reliability of power
supply, compatibility with current standards for electrical supply and PG&E's required
improvements, and accommodations for the station's telemetry and SCADA equipment.
Provisions for a generator and integral load bank will be included.
7P2334138.004 s yn*r*$rs*.kY
EXHIBIT A, Page 9 of 10
Winzler & Kelly will use Miller Pipeline to perform utility locating work. The exact
scope of work will be developed once the alignment is determined, and the pump station
alternative is selected.
2.6 Meet with City to Review 507o Comments
Once the City has reviewed the 50Yo submittal, key members of the Winzler & Kelly
design team will meet with the City to review comments and critical items that need to be
incorporated into the subsequent design stages.
Winzler & Kelly will revise the plans and specifications as necessary to address all
comments received during the 50Yo review period. Comments received from extemal
agencies will be coordinated with the City prior to incorporation.
2.7 Prepare 907o Plans and Specifications
Winzler & Kelly will prepare the 90Yo design submittal for the City. This submittal will
include all technical specification sections, the complete set of detail drawings, all
general sheets, civil, mechanical, structural and electrical pump station plans and details,
pipeline plan and profile drawings, connection and structure details, all permits, rights of
entry, staging areas, and other easement issues, and all utility information.
Winzler & Kelly will develop separate traffic control sheets to be incorporated into the
drawing set as part of the Contract Documents. Winzler & Kelly will coordinate with the
City of Burlingame and Caltrans to ensure that the traffic control plans meet the standards
of the permiuing agencies. For the portions of the work within the Caltrans right-of-way,
plans will be prepared with dual units (both imperial and metric).
The estimate of probable construction cost (to t l0%) and the construction schedule will
be refined. All design review comments from the City will be addressed and
incorporated. As a check of the accuracy of the utility information shown, the90Yo
submittal will be provided to each utility for final comments.
2.8 Meetwith City to Review 90/" Comments
Key members of the Winzler & Kelly project team will aftend a review meeting, to be
convened by the City, to discuss the comments of the City relative to the 90% submittal.
During this meeting, comments will be discussed as necessary and a method of resolution
will be agreed upor
2.9 Incorporate City and Agency Requirements
Winzler & Kelly will revise the plans and specifications {rs necessary to address all
comments received during the90o/o submittal review period. Comments received from
external agencies will be coordinated with the City prior to incorporation. As part of this
task, final permit conditions will be incorporated into the documents.
IP2334138.004 s:rn:n**srffi.kr
CITy OF BURLINGAME
ManSTEN PUMP STATION UPGRADE
CITy OF BURL!NGAME
MRnSTEN PUNAP STATION UPGRADE
EXHIBIT A, Page 10 of 10
2.lO Obtain Caltrans Encroachment Permit and Other Agency Approvals
Winzler & Kelly witl provide assistance to the City in securing approvals from all
agencies having jurisdiction over this project. Agency approvals are anticipated to be
needed from City of Burlingame, Caltrans, Corps of Engineers, State Water Resource
Control Board (Stormwater Permit), and possibly others such as the Dept. of Fish &
Game, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, etc. Assistance may include participation in
coordination meetings, responding to staffquestions, and revisions of the plans to
incorporate requirements. Winzler & Kelly design team members will prepare the permit
applications and lead the coordination effort with all agencies with jurisdiction over this
project.
2.ll Prepare l00%o Plans and Specifications
Winzler A keUy will incorporate each of the comments of the City and external agencies,
as agreed to during the review meeting, into ttre 100% Contract Documents. A final
l}}o/odesign submifiat including all Contract Documents will be prepared and submitted
to the City for review and approval to prepare documents for bidding.
2.12 Prepare X'inal Plans @id SeQ
A Bid-ready set of the Confiact Documents and the Geotechnical Report will be provided
to the City for reproduction and bidding. The final bid set will include all required
signatures, have required permits and project construction requirements included as
appendices, and provide bidding forms for the contractor's bid. In addition, the
specifications and geotechnical report will be provided electronically to the City.
2.13 Prepare Estimate of Probable Construction Cost
For each submittal, Winzler & Kelly will prepare estimates of the probable construction
cost with contingencies to reflect the state of development of the design. At the 100%
stage, a final cost estimate for the project will be prepared, to be used as the Engineer's
Estimate during bidding of the projecl.
2.14 Conduct Public Hearing / Public Relations Program
Winzler & Kelly will assist the District in conducting a public meeting for the project.
Assistance will include providing appropriate community notification, preparing and
delivering a formal presentation, and responding to questions from the public. The goal
of the public hearing will be to concurrently meet the requirements of the CEQA process,
to inform the community of the construction plans, and to receive input from the public.
Additional requirements for a public ouheach program will be included in the design
documents. These requirements will place responsibilrty for notification of the public
prior to and during Construction on the contractor. Elements of the public outreach
prog.an may include erection of construction signs, mailing ofwritten notices, monthly
newsletters, and other means.
I oox6urrlfi6 Etolt{EEesP2334r38.004
'vt7wr7v.Yvv
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
July 25,2002
8lo5l02
RAM, CITY PROJECT NO.
8g
ITEM
MTG.
DATE
#
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
PUBLIC WORKS
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FY 2OO1/02 ANNUAL SIDEWA
8027
BY
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council accept the FY 200t102 Annual Sidewalk Program in the
amount of $708,360.
BACKGROUND: On September 5, 2000, the project was awarded to B-1 Enterprise Corporation. On September
4, 2OOl , the contract was extended to FY 200L102 in the amount of $600,000. Staff was authorized to issue change
orders up to 25% of the consffuction work.
The total construction cost of the project was $708,360. The increase of $108,360 or l87o is due to staff authorizing
additional necessary sidewalk construction within the Burlingame Grove subdivision and additional curb and gutter
construction at various locations in anticipation of street resurfacing work. The extra sidewalk construction was
included in this project to take advantage of the low bid prices. The project was completed in compliance with the
project plans and specifications.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment
BUDGET IMPACT:
Construction Cost
Consultant Services
Supplies and Tools
Engineering Administration
TOTAL COST
$708,360
$ t4,562
$ t,292
$ 70.1s3
$794,357
FUNDS AVAILABILITY:
2C0ll02 Sidewalk CIP $740,000
Business Reimbursements $ 2,931
2002103 Street Resurfacing $ 40,000
California Drive Resurfacing $ 13.000
TOTAL FUNDS $795,931
The remaining funds will be used in the2N2l2003 Sidewalk Program.
Donald Chang, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director, B-1 Enterprise
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\8027accept.wpdSR.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - FY 2OOUO2 ANNUAL SIDEWALK PROGRAM
BY B-1 ENTERPRISE CORPORATION
CITY PROJECT NO. 8027
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1 The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by B-1
ENTERPRISE CORPORATION under the terms of its contract with the City dated SEPTEMBER 5,
2000, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council
and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 8027.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
,2OO2, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
S:\A Public Vr'orks DirecIory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd
City Clerk
g-1 ENTERPRTSE CORP
A.DDR8g8r P.O. aOX 6130
cosoNr, cr 92e70-6I30fllEpltoNBr l9o9l 211-2356 srx (909) 211-0222
ttltttt*tatr+tar*tttrttlattarttrratrtirarrrttrrrrrt*ttrtrrrr*i** r trtttrarartr
IT${r i U}rt? :I I ITE{ DiSCilpTION r pRtCB :ttar.rrtrrrrrarr rrrr*rlrrratrltr
A. IOU'N OF BURUNgAIIIE tUBDMsION
1 I RTUO/E N{D REPLACE SIDEWALK
2 I REHOVE AI{D REPLACS DRIVTI,AY
3 I RIUOVE N{D REPLACE 1{i CURI N{D q,TTER
4 I RIHOVE SIDEIiALK II{D RBPLICI }IITII TOP SOIL
3 I REUOVE IND R,PLACE CURB
6 : CONSTRUCT CURB 8.ATP
7 : CONSTRUCT SEf,'8A CLEA}I.OUT 8RN{8
8 I RIFI.IR / RE9LACT WA'IRLINE IlOi HAX,)
9 ! R8l{O1,8 A9PSAI.T CONCREIE IND coTcRETE B.ASE
10 ! RE:HOVE ASPIIALT COIICRETE ONLY
11 r AgPlltL! CoI{CRETE SUR.II.CIN6
12 r CROSS (IrrTEF,
13 I A66RIOA?E BASE
1{ I .IIWST I{AI.ISOLI TO GRADE
15 I sAn cU? coNcRSTE
15 r stc|{ PosT
1? | !{lT8R PoST
18 I RELoCATE sroRu Dl,l,lNS 8OR CURB R.[r{PS
19 t RIP IR 1ni,16a?IOI 9YSfEM
20 I INSTAI! CONCR,ETE BASE EELO{ TIE Ag SECTION AT 3 INCIIES DEETE
t
B.ROLU}Is ROAD
1 ! RElloVE AND REPLACE SIDETAIK
2 I RTUOVE A}ID REPL.ICE 14" C1,R8 N{D GUTTER
3 r CONSTRUCT gEtfER CLEIN-Ou! IRAME
{ ! coNs?RucT qrRa SlxP
5 r REMOVE l'6PllAL? CONCRBfI ONLY
CHAT{GE ORDERT':
COIr
CO2t
co3l
DEDUCTIO}I ITEiI
Dtr 1 I UATER DIPT.RfiSNT IIIVOICS NO. 1
DI 2 I 8 B(X,RS TNSPECTION DURING IIOI,IDAY
Dtr 3 ! $Al8R DEDIR!US!|T TNVOICS tfo. 2
I
I
41,409,8 s, tr.
12,505.9 S. r.
2,900.0 L. E.
3,925.0 S. E,
10.0 5. 8.
33.0 EACS
14.0 EACS
2,O EACS7,300.0 s. E.
1.00 s. E.
139.00 ?o!rs
100,0 s,8.
1,050,0 ?oNs
2,a EtcE50.0 L. F.
1.0 EACI
1.0 EACH
1.0 EACE
.1, 0 L. S.
6,150.0 S.r.
BORLTI''6.AMD TOIATJ
s6.so
s2 9.00
$400.00
s1, oo0,o0
s3.00
: 1,130.0 S. 8. :
: 205,0 L. r. I, 1.0 Etctr Ir 1,0 Ercfl !t 228.OO S, r. :
ROLI.INS ROAD IOTAL, IOTAL I
s7,345.00
$5, 945, 0o
6400.o0
$1,000.00
668{ . O0
615,3?4.00
CI?Y OI BURLINGA.I,IE
DlocRtss PAwt!'T. 9
Clmtr;ltr !! SIDIINA, eull ,e qrltlltA
CITY PRO.]ECT NO.--393!_
QI'ANTIfY
UNIT
9lzt
9269, 163.70
t93, 79{ ,30
$8i[' 100.00
$11, ?75.00
$290.00
$33. 000. oo
15, 600. o0
$3.600.00
s2x,900.00
s3. o0
820,850.00
91,000,00
t10,500,00
$1, 200. o0
t2o0.0o
3 100. oo
s100.00
$ 4, 000.00
95, OO0. OO
s18, t50. 0o
ssE4,626.00
DAflr
FOR TEE T{ONT}I OP!
zuRCIIAsI ORDER f
Jutr.-20-02
DECEMBER
L2972
BID : BID I ot.l}rlrlY 3
r Ll.lolrNT : TO Df,?l !t.ararrrttrtrttt ratragEta
I
PATD
t ll{ouM I
I TO DATE I
PREVIOUS
PAID
I tl{ot tf!
I TBrS PtO.
$6.50 r
$7,50 !
629,00 r
13,00 :
429. OO r
$11000.00:
${00.00:
$1,600.00 |
S3.OO !
f3.00:
8150.00 !
610.o0 !
S1O.0O r
1600.O0 !
${.00 !
8100.00:
1100,00 t
84'000,00 |
l5,0oo.oo !
63.00 r
,245t147.13
all | 729,1A
t105,022.63
111,8{1.06
10.00
0s2, 000.00
4 4, 000.00
$1,800.00
9,15, 054,30
90,00
838,610.00
t53, 54 9,00
t7,799.30
62, 400, O0
9124,OO
s200. o0
8o.oo
t4,000.00
ls, 000. o0
{'I0.91r..30
$245t181,15
471,129,r8
1105.022. 53
111,8{1.06
$0.00
952, 000, o0
${, 000.00
$1,800.00
$4{.586.30
90.00
$32. {60.00
950, 060,00
s7, ?99,30
91,800.00
6124,O0
8200. O0
$0,0o
$4, 000. o0
95, OOO.0o
040.911,30
! S685, 121.52 r
60.00
s0,00
90,00
90, 00
s0.00
94 68 .00
t0.00
86,150,00
$3,489.00
10.00
6600.oo
s0.00
s0.00
60. o0
00.00
so.o0
80.00
s 10, ?07. oo
$0,00
$0. o0
50.00
go. 00
lo. oo
lo. 0o
$0.00
t0.00
90.00
1' 130.0 !
205.0 r
1,0 !
1.0 r
228.0 t
100.00r
100.00t
100.00t
:.00.00t
100.001
426.52
t7,3{5,00
$5,949.00
$400.00
s 1, 000.00
968 4 ,00
$15,3?4.00
9?, 345.00
15, 945.00
${o0. oo
I 1, 000. oo
$684.00
$15,3?4,00
ON,IOI['II. BID 8600,000,00
CEANGE ORDSRS
TOfAI DEDUC'IION
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
o.o
0.0
0,0
o.o
0
0.0
-t2i 332,96
-3{30.62
-s79,38
-t2,332,96 t
-9430.62 !
(179,3E) r
G2,842 ,96t 182,842.961
DLTE
SUB?OTAL a1 7L,202,52
(9?1.120,25)
$3s, 560.13
$575.642.39
{s2,8{2.96)
t612,199 , 43
l?00.495.52
(9?0,0{9.55)
$35.02{.78
t10, ?o? ,00
($1, 070. ?0)
90. 00
6-20-2002
U*/*
LESS T8N PERCENT RETEN'ION
5t RrlEIttOr ill.lllttD
*trrrirri.rrtt
SUBTOTAL }'I?IIOU! DEDUCTIONS
AI{CXJNT DUE TROU CON?RACTOR
1665, {?0,75 !
1t2,842.961 |
99, 536.30
$0. o0APPROVED
BY
I PLI. ob8g. t!L1r est to roqoE! I 320-80231-220,
TO'IAL 11I1S PERIOD 366V,621 ,
/
t9.616,
8lA Pt ltlc TVORXS oIRECrOR\ PROJ6CTSltt2IPrcrffi Pr,trur P!o,!d ltlo, 8027., (SHEEI- PROORESS PAYI{$r to.r)
Gr20rc2. 4:01 Pll *z.hu-7\2-o -"-51-7&'^@)-
!
37,813.5 I
10,363.89 !
3r 621,4? I
3,947,O2 t
O.0O !
52.00 r
10.00:
1.00 |
15,018.10 r
o.o0:
251.40 |
5, 354.90 :
119,93 |
4.00 r
31.00 r
2.00 !
0,00 |
1.00 r
1,OO r
13,637.10 |
91.321 r
82,8rC !
12{.881:
100,361 I
O.O0l r
157.58r I
?1,43r r
50.001;
205,73t !
0.001 !
185.181 |
535{,904 :
74.28i !
2O0.OOl r
62.00i i
200,00t I
O,Oot !
100,00$ !
1OO.ooc r
221.141 t
I
t-*-lgag- |
r {S2,8{2.96) :
!
-12,332,96 |
-$430,62 !
-s?9.38 I
't
AGENDA
ITEM #
8h
STAFF REPORT MTG.
DATE 8t5t2002
SUBMITTEDTO: Honorable Mavor and Council
DATE: Julv 15.2002 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larrv E. Anderson, City
AUTHORIZE CITY ATTORNEY TO JOIN IN AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF IN VALLEY
oarDooR vs. coaNTY oF RTVERSTDE (scvss 738ss) AT No cosr ro crrY
BY
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize joinder in amicus curiae brief at no cost to the City in Valley Outdoor vs. County of Riverside, which
is now pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
DISCUSSION:
One of the more recent cottage industries in Southern California has been the weekend construction of illegal
billboards without necessary permits. The billboard company then contends that the entire sign code of the local
jurisdiction is unconstitutional and the company's fabricated First Amendment rights are being violated. This is
the scenario that faced the City of San Mateo recently.
As with San Mateo, Riverside County prevailed in the trial court and the billboard company has appealed the
decision to the Ninth Circuit. The crafting of the Ninth Circuit's decision will go a long way to setting the
boundaries on billboard operations in the country.
Therefore, it is recommended the City join in the amicus brief supporting Riverside County's position.
RECOMMENDED FOR
$4,022,135.67
Ck. No.83357 - 83925
Excludes Library cks 148812 - 149290
Aeeniar}T-$or-
Meeting Date \r - '
\
r
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for June
$1,01 1,911.04
Ck. No. 148812 - 149290
*EFTS for June 2002
$390,406.20
-ELECTRON IC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withhotding
SDI (State Disabitity)
PERS- Heatth Benefits
Retirement
S :\Fl N EXCEL\M ISC ELLAN EOUS\COUNC I LCKS.XLS
((
GEI]ERAL FUI]D
CAPITAL IMPROVEIIENTS FUND
t,JATER FUNO
SEUER FUND
GOLE CENTER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUIID
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPI'IENT SERVICES FUI{D
I },I FORi.IAT I ON SERVICES TUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY TUND
07-05 - 2002
IIAME
THIS IS TO
I NCLUSIVE.
TflE AI4C[,NT
OFFI CIALS,
ACCORDAIICE
RESPECTFULLY SUBI'IITTED,
CITY OF BURLIIIGAI'IEl.,ARRANT REGISTER
FU[o RECAP - 02.03
FUND
101
320
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
119,757
$1 ,100,084.62
99
69
19
58
a7
00
92
97
00
90
21
65,443
865,010
23,240
2,5t6
13,490
5,685
1,84?
2,036
54A
491
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
IIONORABTE MAYOR A D CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIIIS LISTED OtI PAGES NUI{BENEO FROI., 1 THROTJGH 8
AND,/oR CLAIIiS NU|{BERED FROit 83820 TIROUGIi 83925 INCLUSM,TOTALT c IN
OF $1,100,081.62, NAVE BEEN CIIECKED I}I DETAIL AND APPRovEIi BY THE PRoPER
Ai]D III I.IY OPINIOI.I REPRESENT FAIR Ai/D JUSI CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY INl,JIIH THEIR RESPECIIVE AiIOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
APPROVED TOR PAYI.IENT
COJNCI L
DATE
DATE
rt"(
FINAIICE OIRECTOR
(,(,tt
07-0r-2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAMEl'lARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . 02.03
PAGE 10
AMOUNTFUND
101 tbL.z5 + \obo-@= 4q*b'18
3b
l-ag
1,724.93 V
synrit
l,L+50"oo,
5LB,qO
-+
H.N.RABLE MAyoR AND crTy couNcrl , L1,qq0 'og
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII|iS LISTED ON PAGES NUT,IBERED FROI.I 1 THRCX.JGH 10INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 83820 THROUGH 83925 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AI,IOI.JNT OF S1 ,724.93, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPEROFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE UITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AIi,IOIJNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFUL LY SUBI..I I TTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNC I L DATE
,(,tl
07-05-2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
UATER FUND
SE!,ER FUND
GOLF CEIITER FUND
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMENT SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF EURLINGA},IEt.JARRA}IT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . 01-02
PAGE 9
AMOUNTFUND
101
320
526
527
529
518
619
620
621
625
731
63,7ig.06 ( tbl,zg ) /' l, o ee o' oo] -- (pz,$q?' 3 I
aes,oto.oe /,t,4€o- | = 9og ,€bo, b6t
23,240.49
2,536.59
13,490.97
5 ,685 . 00
1,94?.92
2,036.97
548.00
491.90
119,757.?1
,ogas6.oc
(.ou3.qO7* rtzqq 'Oz
l,oq5't,L++,54$1
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERIIFY THAT IHE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUI,IBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9INCLUSIVE, AND/oR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 83820 THROUGH 83925 INCLUSM,TOTALING IN
M 1!0uNT 0F $1,098,359.69, HAVE BEEN CHECKED rN DETATL AND APPROVED By THE pROpER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE I,'ITH IHEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNC I L DATE
((a
}IARCO CHAVEZ
DEPOSI T REFU},IDS
83917 333 LORToN LLC
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
CONSORT IUiI CONSOT IDATE CORP
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
JEFF NOVIIZKY
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
83919 DIA}I}IA HERI.IANN
I,4 I SCELLANEOUS
83920 JOEL I.i I TT LER
IIl ] SC E L LAI,I EOU S
83921 CURT !/ALKER
MI SCELLANEOUS
83922 CREATE TOUNDAT ION
MI SCELLA}IEOUS
83923 AOUAM AOUATIC SPECIALISTS
I.II SC. SUPPTIES
(
ACCC}IJNT
917.47 101 65200 111
202.15 527 66520 120
1,628.93 101 56100 400
300.00 731 22520
300.00 731 2?5?O
300.00 731 22520
500.00 731 22525
500.00 731 22525
500.00 731 22525
500.00 731 ??525
110,000.00 731 22513
1,815.00 't0't 68010 120 1104
673,121.22 320 80231 210
99,744.78 320 80231 220
CITY OF EURLINGAI.IElJARRANT REGISTER
07 /05 /02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hsnd 9ritten Checks
PAGE 7
AI.IOTJNT
917.47
202.15
1 ,628.93
300.00
300.00
300.00
500.00
500.00
500 -00
500.00
1 10, 000.00
1,813.00
673,121 ,22
99,741.78
COI,4ADE
UISC. SUPPLIES
85913 ARAI.IARK UNI FORI,I SERVICE
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
NUMBER NAME
8391?
43914
83915
B3916
83918
83925
IOIAL
23796 . AP
2a7C7 AP
2379a
23800 aP
23801 AP
23802 AP
23803 AP
23804 AP
23805 AP
23805 AP
23807 AP
23808 AP
23809 AP
CIRCUIT CITY
III I SCELLANEOUS
ARTHUR BROS.,INC.
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
83921 TOP GRADE CONSTRUCTIO}I
PROFESSIO}.IAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
(
$1,100.084.62
(
23799 AP
(
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IETIARRANT REGISTER
07/05/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand t"lritten Checks
ACCOUNT
2,500.00 101 65200 031
512.00
548.00 621
42.23 101 64420 't'tl
71.13 619 64460 210 5220
77.25 526 2250?
500.00 101 64420 262
59.40 619 64460 ',t20 5160
25.03 101 64350 110
17,500.00 320 80200 210
1,450.00 320 76010 180
1,060.00 101 64420 250
141.49 625 65213 203
't,723.06 529 68050 120 4200
189.00 101 64100 120
441.67 101 65200 160
83896 BILL REILLY
M I SCELLANEOUS
23046 AP
83897 PITNEY BOI.IES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY HALL I'TAINTENANCE
23128 AP
83898 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OFFICE EXPENSE
0 220
200
00
64450
65
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
2, 500 . 00
1 , 060.00
42.23
71.13
77.25
500.00
59.40
25 .05
1 7, 500.00
14'.t.49
1 ,723.06
189.00
441.67
83899 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, Iltc.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83900 TIM CROI.JE
M I SCELLANEOUS
83901 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
TRAINING EXPENSE
83902 HOME DEPOT
t,I I SC. SUPPL I ES
83903 EBER ELECTRONIC SUPPLY
OFFICE EXPEIISE
83904 DEAN CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83905 KATHLEEN DORE PROPERTIES
RENTS & LEASES
83906 NCHRA
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
83907 KME FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
83908 PRO SELECT SPORTS
MISC. SUPPLIES
83909 DOERR STUDIOS
MISC. SUPPLIES
8391 O AT&T I.'I RELESS
COi.IMUNICAIIONS
85911 PENINSULA HARLEY DAVIDSON
SUPPL I ES
23311
23356
23367
23384
23505
23538
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
23622 '7 \J\O+ o\-oa- c-u',/re-'nt qL ry
nll oL-oz- U;,ewe-nt qa- r/vl?Bffi A{
23763 AP
23792 AP
23793 AP
23794 AP
.(,lt
060-
23795 AP 85.69 620 15000
85 .69
(
(
NUI.IBER NAME
83881
83885
83886
83888
83890
81891
83892
83891
TURF STAN
EOUI PMENT I,4AI NT,
FIRST AUTOI,4OT IVE DISTRIBUTORS
GAS, OIL & GREASE
PENINSUTA FORD OF SAN ERUNO
SUPPLIES
TZER HUNG
MI SCELLA}IEOUS
(
ACCOUNT
300.00 731 22520
1,250.95 101 65400 120
92.36 526 69020 120
70.12 101 68010 120 1587
240.00 619 64460 ?10 5150
9,294.r7
1 ,872.10
529 36715
529 68030 213
6n.29 101 65100 160
159,13 101 65200 120
9.33 101 68020 200 2200
368.15 101 65200 201
141.59 620 15000
36
CITY OF EURLINGAMEL'ARRANT REGISTER
07/05 /02
VEiIOOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes Hard tJritten Checks
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
300.00
I ,250.95
92.36
70,12
240.00
11,166.67
1 ,518. '18
159.13
9.33
368.13
141.59
500.00
21509 AP
83882 ENfORCEMENT TECHI'IOLOGY, I },IC.
III SC. SUPPLIES
21719 AP
81883
T0t4 coNDo|l
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
MISC. SUPPLIES
83884 I,4ANDEGo, lNC.
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
PROVIDENCE PEST TERI.IITE
PROFESS IOIIAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
VB GOLF LLC
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
RECREAT ION PROGRAI,4 EXPEilSE
83887 Ar&T
COMI,4UN I CAT IONS
21765 AP
21855 AP
21947 AP
?1948 AP
22138 AP
22216 AP
2?478 AP
22682 aP
22857 AP
22891 AP
22924 AP
?2971 AP
OFF ICE DEPOT CREDIT PLA}I
OFT I CE EXPENSE
EOUIPXENT I.IAI NT.
260.57
257.61
10'1 65100 110
10'1 65400 200
83889 I.IID-AMERICAN SPECIALTIES
}1I SC. SUPPLIES
3
50
66
r01 65',t00 110
101 65 t00 2?0
500.00 731 22s25
83895 I,4I XE COFFEY
TRAVEL & I.{EETINGS
21009 AP 352.35 10t 64100 250
352.35
,(
679.29
348.1683893 IMAGISTICS IIITERI]ATIONAL
OFEICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
NUI,4BER NAI.IE
83868
83869
83670
83871
838rJ
83874
83875
83A76
83878 cEB
(
OETAI L ACCoU T
'1 , 158,15 101 65100 800
27.60 101 65200 110
228.36 101 65200 160
1,107.72 731 22560
773.56 526 69020 130
CREATIVE INTERCO}I}IECT
COI'IMUN I CAT IOIIS
IJESTERN STAR I'IURSERIES
I,4I SCELLAIIEOUS
OIEHLIS EOUIPtlE}IT
SIIALL TOOLS
AT&T !/IRELESS
COMiIUI/ I CAT IONS
t.I I CRO HAREHOUSE
CONTRACIUAT SERVICES
LARRY A}IOERSON
}II SCELLANEOUS
CITY OT BURL I NGAMEI.IARRANT REGISTER
07 /05 /02
VENDORr*! Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
19583 AP
1976a AP
19865 AP
19884 AP
20060 AP
?0079 AP
20301 AP
20706 AP
20716 AP
20739 AP
20891 AP
21210 AP
21216 AP
PAGE 4
A}IOUNT
1.158.15
27.60
228.36
1,107.72
773.56
3,755.00
800.00
109.09
17.30
76A,99
4?8,64
70,546.32
28.80
1,534.55
85866 OFFICE DEPOT
CAPITAL EOUIPMENI
83867 BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC
OTFICE EXPENSE
PEII INSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
RENTS & LEASES
REIITS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
83872 cAu toRuA cogBoYs
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1 ,25
1 ,25
1 ,25
1,67
1.67
1.66
RlclrARD coUELL C0.
CAPI TAL EOUIPI,4ENT
83877 I.IIKE BRO}/N ELECTRIC CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
800.00 '10'1 68010 220 1451
'109.09 10't 66100 160
17.10 320 A0410 220
768.99 101 64350 031
428.64 101 65200 800
70,516.32 320 79103 220
28.80 101 64350 120
1,534,55 620 15000
I.,II SC. SUPPLIES
83879 RED!/OOD GENERAL TIRE
SUPPLIES
83880 0t4G !.tAx IMUS
I.I I SCELLANEOTJS
21268 AP 4.021.00 101 33900
4,O21.00
(.(
19588 AP
101 66210 180
526 69020 180
527 66120 180
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAMEt.,ARRANT REGISTER
07/05t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l.rritten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
549.49 526 69020 120
200.00 101 68020 220 2't00
715.77 731 22543
347.33 619 64460 210
1,348.65 101 64250 110
350.41 6?5 65213 203
139.64 101 65200 140
1,563.23 101 66210 800
515.76 731 22543
678.00 526 69020 011
101 55400 200
619 64460 ?10 5220
141.87 101 64420 150
2,000.00 526 69020 210
969.58 101 68010 120 1580
518.93 101 65200 200
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
649.49
200.00
715.77
347.33
1,348.55
350.41
139.64
4,563.23
515.76
678.00
141.87
2, 000 . 00
969.38
518.93
83850 coMP usA
MISC. SUPPLIES
8385 1 CLARK PEST CONTROL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83852 DOUG SIMON
},II SCELLANEOUS
83853 ROMIC ENVIRONMENTAL
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83854 STANDARD REGISTER
OFFICE EXPENSE
83855 HI -TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAINT.
83856 LEE & ASSOCIATES
UN I FORIi{S AND EaU I PMENT
83857 CALIFORNIA PNEUMATIC TOOL CO
CAPITAL EOUIPI..IENT
83858 DOY PRATER
M I SCELLAIIEOUS
83859 LABoR READY, INC.
TEMPORARY EMPLOYI'IENT SVC.
85860 BAY ALARM
EOUIPMENT MAINT.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83861 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PUELICATIONS & ADVERTISING
83862 JJR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83853 GOETZ BROTHERS
MISC. SUPPLIES
83864 MINOLTA EUSINESS SYSTEMS
EOUIPMENT MAINT.
83865 EURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
16687 AP
16735 AP
17122 AP
17453 AP
17495 AP
17546 AP
17568 AP
17741 AP
1852'.t AP
18559 AP
18854 M
18893 AP
18979 AP
19045 AP
19131 AP
@^or otazA/?s(s g;-vvenY '4a25
00
161.
543.
ll
19356 AP 312.99 101 65200 203
312.99
(,(a
(
I,IUMBER NAI.iE
83835
83836
83839
83840
83811
83842
83844
83848
CITY OF BURLIIIGAI.IETIARRAIT REGI STER
07 /05t02
RD OFF I CE SOLUTIONS
OFF ICE EXPE}ISE
85837 PoM nJC-
CAPIIAL EOU I Pi,IENT
83838 ABAG - LIABILITY
CLAII.IS PAYMENTS
CRAIG !'. REED
COTIIRACTUAL SENVTCES
THE I{AG I C PRESS CORP.
OFF I CE EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
OOCUI,IENT PROCESSING SYSTETIS
EOUI PI'IEI'IT I.{AI NT.
GERBOTH FIRE EXT I I,IGUISHER CO.
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
83843 ADAI.ISON I}|DUSTRIES
POLICE.-SUPPLIES
105.27 101 64250 200
117.50 619 64460 210 5130
1,726.72 101 65100 126
97.23
423.67
526 69020 120
t27 66520 230
2,000.00 731 22520
3,291.60 101 65100 220
96.00 't0l 68010 120 1787
677.96 731 22513
SERVICE U}ILIMITED IIIC.
BLOG. & GROUNDS MA I NT,
ROYAL L'HOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. SUPPLIES
PUI.IP EOUIPIIENT REPAIR
CAROL PRATER
M ISCELLANEOUS
VENDOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes Hand !ritten Checks
03531 AP
ACCOUNT
741.35 101 65100 190
50,75 101 66210 't10
2,301.07 320 80180 800
5,685.00 618 61520 601
658.00 101 68010 ?20 1587
735
09213 A?
09248 AP
09518 AP
09881 aP
13759 AP
13890 AP
14021 AP
14414 AP
14855 AP
154a7 AP
15595 AP
15701
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
741 ,35
50.75
2,301 ,07
t,685.00
658.00
799.97
105.27
117.50
1 ,726.72
520.90
2,000.00
3,291.60
96.00
64
02
95
101 65',t00 110
101 65400 120
83845 BENEDETTI CONCRETE
OEPOSI T REFU}IDS
83846 ALL CI TY iIANAGEI4ENT
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
43447 PE}I IIISULA ASA
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
16417 AP
(
83849 LINIIARI PETERSEN PO/ERS ASSOC.
I.I I SCELLAT.IEOUS
16599 AP r,040,00 731 22515
1,040.00
(
677,96
83825
83826
83827
(
NIJI,4BER NAME
83820 ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
TEI,IPORARY ETIPLOY[1EI,IT SVC.
83821 A.C COIIIROL SERVICES
PUI.IP EOUI PI.IEIIT REPAIR
83822 EAUER COI4PRESSORS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
83823 GCS I/ESTERI'I POI'ER &
SUPPLIES
83824 0 & 11 TouINc, mc.
SUPPL IES
OULIII ADVERT I SI IIG INC.
PUELICATIOIIS & ADVERTISIIIG
E!]I }iG I RR I GAT I OI.I PR@UCTS
I,{ I SCELLANEOUS
t/. !/, GRAINGER, INC.
SI.IALL TOOLS
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAIIIT.
MISC. SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIATIZED S
83828 GRANITE ROCK COIIPANY
STREET RESUR'AC I NG EXPENSE
83829 K & [/ DISCOUNI LIGHTING & SUPP
}II SC. SUPPLIES
83830 LA!/SON PRODUCTS, INC.
SIiIALL TOOLS
83831 MAIIPOI,'ER
PROFESS IOI.JAL & SPECIALIZED S
83832 P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
83833 PUMP REPAI R SERVICE CO.
PUI'IP EOUIPI{E}IT REPAIR
CITY OT BURLINGAIIEL'ARRA}iT REGISTER
07 t05t02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r oenotes Hard lJritten Checks
(
ACCOUtiT
820.00 10't 65100 011
659.10 527 665?0 210
128.78 101 65200 203
225.11 620 15000
2,195.30 ',t01 61420 150
601.11 529 6a030 192 1200
01030 AP
01061 AP
01309 AP
0'1857 AP
02029 AP
02036 AP
02157 AP
02248 AP
02251 Ap
02645 AP
02755 AP
02819 AP
03054 AP
03197 AP
101 65200 130
101 65200 203
619 64460 120 5120
619 64460 210 31?0
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
820.00
659.10
'I28.78
22r.11
50.00
2,195 .30
601 - 1/,
523.81
982.76
160.10
93 -79
134.40
19,891.81
34.71
21.51
10.59
453 -97
2.76 101 66210 226
160.10 101 66210 120
93.79 101 66210 130
134.40 526 69020 210
19,a94.A4 101 66240 170
17,486.53 526 69020 230
83834 INTORI'IATION SERVICES OEPT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,333.00 'tO1 65150 220
1,33t.00
50.00 620 15000
(
17,1 .53
03378 AP
(
06-28-2002
THIS IS TO
INCI.USIVE,
THE A q,'NT
OFF I C IALS,
ACCORDANCE
(
CITY OF EURLIIIGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER
FUIID RECAP - 01.02
PAGE 12
AMOUI]TNAI.IE FUIID
101
320
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
GENERAL FUND
CAPI TAL IMPROVEI.IENTS FUND
SEI,JER CAP ITAI PROJECT FUND
}/AIER FUND
SEL/ER FUND
GOLT CENTER FUND
SELI INSURA CE TUID
TACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUI PMENT SERVI CES FUiID
INFORMATIOI/ SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY TUIID
BURLINGAiIE TRAIN SHU]ILE PROGRAI.I
UTILIIY REVOLVI IIG FUND
103,171 .70
173,711 .10
25 ,139 .64
218,007 ,04
315,916.78
19,496.79
3,871 .15
19 ,811 .72
1,293.89
6,676.10
151 .31
100,453.68
29.27
66,355.84
IOTAL TOR APPROVAL s1,107,397.01
HONORABLE IiJAYOR ANO CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII4S LISTEo ON PAGES NUIT|BERED FRO{ 1 THROUGH 12
ANO/OR CLAI}IS IIUIIEERED FRd.I 83649 TIIROUGH 83797 TNCLUSTVE,TOTALING IT
OF $1,107,397.01, HAVE EEEN CHECKED I}I DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY THE PROPER
ANO I }.I MY OPINIOII REPRESEIIT TAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAINST TIIE CITY tII9ITIi IHEIR RESPECTIVE AiiIOU}ITs As IIIDICATED TIIEREoN.
RESPECTFULLY SUBI.4I TTED,
FTNANCE OIRECTOR DATE
DATEcoul,lct L
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.(
(
KELLY iIOORE
TRAFF I C COITTROL I,4ATERIALS
KEVIII BIRTIIIIGHAI,4
I{I SCELLANEq,JS
I,IISCELLANE(ITS
D.A. POPE IIIC.
IlISCELLAIEqJS
S IGIITECH
TII SCELLANEOUS
}.I I SCELTANEOUS
I.IATT VAUGHN
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
83797 A & B CONSTRUCTION
MlscELtAIE0us
CITY OF BURLIIIGAI.IEL'ARRANT REGISTER
06/28t02
((
83788 RICHARD BARBERA PAI }IT II,IG
BLDG. & GROU}.IDS MAIIIT.
83789 I,4ICHAEL BROI.'NRIGC
TRAI }I I NG EXPENSE
83790
NUMEER NAXE
83785 OAVID GRANUCCI
HISCELLANEOUS
83786 GRAFFITI CO}ITROL SERVICES, INC
I.4I SCELLAIIEOUS
83787
VEIIOOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
23777
ACCOUNT
600.00 101 61120 030
1,530.00 731 22578
150,90 101 66210 222
280.00 101 65100 190
275.00 101 64400 261
345.00
500,00
101 36600
731 22525
536.00 731 22546
6,005.91 101 64400 210
66.60
30.50
101 31510
731 ?251A
758.00 f31 22520
8?8.75 101 68010 220 1572
2377a
23779
23780
237a1
23742
23787
23788
23789
35.25
10.00
43.29
40.91
2.00
512.95 526 22502
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
600.00
'1,530.00
150.90
280.00
275.00
845.00
536,00
6,005.91
97 .10
768.00
828.75
151.1a
s12.95
23783
83792 DCE DESrc[,COfitiuNITy & ENVTRONIIE 23784
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83793
83791
237a5
83791 FRAI/K GROSS AN LAI]DSCAPING
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
?37a6
83795
COITNIE CAI,4ERO-DAVIS
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & I,'EETINGS
I.I I SC. SUPPTIES
IRAVEL & I4EETI}iGS
TRAVEL & MEETI}IES
526
527
619
619
620
69020
66520
61460
61460
66700
120
250
120 5130
250
250
TOTAL s1 ,107 ,397 .01
83796
CITY OF BURLINGAIIEI,IARRANT REGISTER
06t28/02
(
ACC0UUT
PAGE 10
At{0uuT
3,161.15
1,026.57
17,760.31
10,765.70
4,557 .OO
1 ,218.78
65.50
78.34
?87.84
453.34
61 .43
11 ,309 .79
2,699.21
83774
83778
83783
NOELE TRACTOR IIIC.
SUPPLIES
1,026.57 101 64350 1,t0
17,760.31 320 75110 210
10,765,70 101 68010 150 lllo
4,557.00 320 80570 210
1,218,78 l0l 64420 250
78,34 6?0 15000
287.U 101 61420 262
153.14 101 68010 '120 110,1
61,43 619 64160 210
VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hsnd gritten Checks
$n1 23301
83772 80tsE cAscADE OF CE PROOUCTS CO 23306
OTT I CE EXPENSE
SIERRA OFF ICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPEIISE
OFF ICE EXPENSE
HISC. SUPPLIES
MI SCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
}.II SC. SUPPLIES
64150
69020
69020
69020
66520
001-70
231 .71
1&.78
16a,33
595.63
?l0'l
526
526
526
527
110
110
120
290
120
83rrj HARRIS DESIGN
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S
23329
23366
23118
23151
23502
23578
23604
23693
23695
SAN TRANCISCO EXAMIIIER
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
83775 CULVER GROUP
PROTESSIOIIA! & SPECIALIZEO S
83ri6 RON LITTLE
TRAVEL & I.IEEI II,IGS
83777 cJ 's oELt
OfTICE EXPENSE
83780 MIKE XORD}IER
I.i I SC. SUPPTIES
23613
83781 REIRIGERATION SUPPLIES OISTRIBUT 23639
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALTZED S
E3782 GBA TIASIER SERIES IIIC.
CAPITAL EOUIP}IEI,II
CAPITAL EOUI PMENT
CAPI TAL EOUIPME}IT
3
3
3
526 69020 800
527 66520 800
619 61460 800
93
93
93
769
769
769
APPLE OIJE EI.iPLOYI,IE}II SERVI CES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,699,24 5?6 69020 210
837A4 PACI F I C BELL/I.iORLDCOI.I
CO}IiIUNICAT I ONS
UTILITY EXPENSE
23728
27.11
3,741 .75
101 65',t00 160
896 20281
3,768.
(
NUI.IEER NAME
83779 FRANKLI}I COVEY
TRAINIiIG EXPE}ISE
"(
65.50 101 64250 '1,10
83761 TURT STAR
EOUIPI,IENT I.IAI }II.
JONES AND iIAYER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
MILLS PENI}ISULA HEALTH SERVICES 22751
PERSO}i}IEL EXAI.II NAT IO}IS
83765 J II.{ NA}ITELL
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
(
ACCOUNT
1,359.80 101 65300 120
?13,15 10t 68010 120 1587
1,161.47 101 64420 030
t65.69 101 68010 120 't101
298.13 101 65200 120
17,872.55 320 78290 220
75.46 10'1 68020 200 2200
356.00 101 64420 121
627.15 101 64150 031
235.91 101 64350 210
2,246.50 101 64400 120
191.4' 101 55500 120
20.30 625 65?13 203
709.68 526 22502
(
IIUII1BER NAUE
83756
83758
83762
83761
83765
83767
83768
43769
CITY OF BURL I NG.A}IEI.'ARRA}IT REGISTER
06/28t02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r oenotes Hand liritten Checks
PAGE 9
AtlO.JNT
1 ,359.80
213.15
1 ,161.17
365,69
294 -13
17 ,872.55
75.46
355.00
627,15
235.91
2,216.50
191.45
20.30
709.68
200.00
DELI. COI.IPUIER CORPORAT ION
MISC. SUPPIIES
ROEERI OEERDICK
III SC. SUPPLIES
83757 OO}IAID SHEPLEY
I.I I SCE L LAN EOI,S
22252
22256
?2375
22384
2247a
22660
22682
22762
22418
22821
22A51
22857
22993
23112
I.i I KE BLONDIIIO
i1I SC. SUPPLIES
83759 ilID-A[ERICAN SPECIALTIES
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
GLASER AIID ASSOCIATES
}1I SC. SUPPLIES
83766 LANDS' EIID, INC.
}II SC. SUPPLIES
FIRST AUTOI.IOT IVE DISTRIBUIORS
FIRE APPARATUS I4AINT.
CAN AI.I CONSTRUCTIO}I
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
T. RANOOLPI'I GRANGE
I.I I SCELTANEOUS
1n
250
6
1
50
00
83770 MAZE & ASSOCIATES
PROIESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CONTRAC]UAL SERVICES
23178
't01 &560 210
101 61250 220
7 ,427.50
83760 8 1 EIITERPRISECORP,
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(
200.00 731 22125
(
NUMEER NAI,iE
83741
,(
CI TY OF BURLINGAI.IE[JARRANT REGISTER
06/24t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Dengtes Hand !/ritten Checks
ACCOUT/T
PAGE 8
AIiOUNT
1,727.51
175 .07
1 ,123.5O
297,00
516.31
3A7.97
80.00
t 1 ,810.80
19,634.38
80.00
96.73
7,426.50
781,01
ARAiIARK UI.J I FORI.I
UIII FORI.IS AIID
UTI I FORI'IS AND
UNI FORMS AiID
UIl I FORIIIS AND
UI.I I FORI.IS AND
SERVICES,
EAU I PI.IE II T
EOU I PI.IE IIT
EOUI P}'E}IT
EOUIPI,4ENT
EOUTPI{EI/T
66210
69020
6(520
64160
66700
I NC.21634
21656
21677
21685
21747
21A56
21947
21948
21999
22008
?2089
10,029,10
1,781.40
586.20
368.02
554.01
84.40
134.88
101
526
527
619
620
'110
140
140
140
140
83742
83743
83717
PORTOSA}i
REIITS & LEASES
GARY MISSEL
I.I I SCELLANECX,JS
83744 TRACY SIRI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,123.50 101 65100 031
297.00 101 68010 220 1315
516.31 101 66100 t60
387.97 101 66210 222
80.00 619 61460 210 5170
83746 [sM I[C.
TRATF I C CONTROL I.IATERIALS
PROVIDEI{CE PEST TERI.IITE
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S
83718 vB GOLF LLC
I,I I SCE L LAN EOt'S
RECREATIO}I PROGRAM EXPENSE
437$COMPAO COIIPUTER CORPORAT ION
CAPITAL EOUIP'4ENT
83750 ALL PETROLEUT.I RECOVERY SERVICE,
GAS, OIL & GREASE
83751 ARCIj !/IRELESS
COI1MUIJ I CAT IOIIS
19,631.38 320 80420 800
80.00 'to'l 65200 201
96.73 10'1 65300 160
7U.01 101 64400 031
83752
83753
SPALDING SPORIS
11I SC. SUPPLIES
t.{ARGARET I.IOIIROE
l,l I SCELLANE0US
22116
22147
83754 CLASS IC SIGNS
CAPI TAL EAUIPI,4EIIT
22190
19,833.08 529 68030 800
19,833.08
83715 CINGULAR !/IRELESS
co ltuilIcATI0[s
(
529 36711
529 68030 213
175.07 101 68020 180 2200
7,126.50 529 68030 120 4200
(
NUII1BER IIAME
83727 PACIFTC GAS & ELECTRIC
i{ I SC. SUPPLIES
81728 DAPPER TIRE CO.. INC.
SUPPLIES
837?9 I L FORI,IAIO
MISC. SUPPLIES
83230 HICRO I/AREHCTTSE
OFF ICE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
CI TY IIALL I{AINTE}IAXCE
83n1 SPR INI PCS
UTILITY EXPEIISE
83732 JEFF DO!'D
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83743 CATHER I }IE J.I.I. NILI.IEYER
irr scELt-ANE0t,S
83734 K-119 oF cALtFORNIA, INC.
t.I I SC. SUPPLIES
CITY OF BURIINGA!{ElIARRANT REGISTER
06/28t02
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
20335
ACCOUiIT
4t982.02 320 76010 120
828.73 620'15000
877.67 101 61120 120
20464
20575
20706
20724
207n
20801
20924
729,41
19.18
35.00
101 61250 110
101 68010 t20 tt87
621 64450 ?00
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
1,982.02
828.73
877.67
813.59
I ,n3.83
643.50
500.00
25.85
782.11
18,575.50
161 .36
100.67
'180.20
88.76
21110
8386 ESA ENVI ROIII.IENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC
DEPOSIT REFUND
21160
83737 cEB 21210
II I SC, SUPPLIES
83rJ8
OUICK I.IIX CO}ICRETE
SIDEI,JALK REPAIR EXPENSE
SPARTAN T@L LLC
SI,IALL TOOLS
1,793.83 896 20281
643.50 101 68010 220 1572
500,00 731 22525
25.85 101 66240 120
782.11 101 66210 219
18,575. r0 731 22590
161.36 101 64350 120
100.67 5?7 66520 130
180,20 526 69020 120
88.76 625 65213 203
21329
83739 cDH GoVERNIIENT, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
21482
83740 UNIVERSAT FLEET SUPPLY IIJC.
FIRE APPARATUS }IAIiII.
21543
(-(
(
CITY OF BURLINGAI.|Et.]ARRANT REGISIER
06/24/02
VE}IDOi DETAIL
'*' Denotes H6hd lrritten Checks
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
676.00
678.00
125.00
96,430,51
313.01
216.40
I 10. 10
162.80
457 -61
640.45
8,709.07
395.00
562.50
296.00
NUI.IBER IIAME
83712
83722
18979
83716 ACCESS UNITORMS & EI4BROIDERY
i1I SC. SUPPLIES
18990
43717 PRETERRED ALLIANCE
PERSOI,IIIEL EXAI.I I }IAT I OI.J S
'19025
83718 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19027
19083
83720
83719 ANG NEUSPAPERS
I.I I SC. SUPPLTES
PUBLICATIOI/S & ADVERTISING
}II SC. SUPPLIES
16.38
2%.02
160.40
101 64400 120
101 6/1200 150
320 75110 120
18572
83713 LABOR READY, r C.
TEI.IPORARY EI.IPLOY}IEIIT SVC.
18659
83714 DEANIS AUTO BOOY &
M I SCELLANEOUS
18795
83715
RI CH SCIUTTO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JJR CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTIJAL SERVICES
SIX FLAGS T1ARINE I,IORLO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ACCfiINT
676.00 101 68010 220 1572
678,00 526 69020 011
125.00 618 64520 604
96,430.51 320 75110 220
313.04 101 65300't20
216.10 101 64420 121
110,10 101 55200 220
857.61 101 6A010 220 1212
8,709.07 526 69020 120
395.00 101 68010 190 1101
562.50 101 65300 220
296.00 101 68010 220 ,1461
AUERICA PRINTING
}II SC. SUPPLIES
83723 BAKER ' S CHEI.I.DRY
BLOG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
19119
19280
19130
19431
19791
1983283725 tioNrcA oLsEtr
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83726 AT&T I.'IRELESS
coflr.tult I cAT IoNS
COI.IMUII I CATIONS
20I01
878.01
29.27
101 65200't50
736 64571 160
907.28
((
83721 THE PERSONAL TOUCH
I'l I SC, SUppLIES
837?1 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROI,P INC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
640.15 101 61420 120
(
ACCOT.,NT
.(
CITY OF BURLINGAME!/ARRAIIT REGISTER
06t24/02
NUI.IBER NAI,4E
83698
83699
83700
83701
a3702
8f,703
83704
83705
83706 ACCURATE r.lArLINGS, rNC
l|I I SC, SUPPLIES
43707 JEFF H IPPS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
83708 R &8 EOU I Pi'IEI.IT RENTALS
I.I I SCELLATIEOUS
81710
101 66210 800
320 78220 800
526 69020 120
621 61150 200
BRINK'S I IIC.
BA}IKING SERVI CE FEES
OFF ICE EXPE}ISE
JAI1ES FORO
I.I I SCELLAIJEOUS
CO{I.IU}I I TY GATEPATH
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
llETRo ll0BILE coliilluN I cAT IoNS
RADIO MAINT.
STANOARD REGISTER
OFF I CE EXPE}ISE
COLORPRIIlT DIGITAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
[I I SC. SIJPPLIES
PENINSULA DIGITAL II,4AGING
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
135.75
426 -11
101 64250 120
529 68030 110 4200
1,653.02 101 64420 030
226.88 101 66210 210
471.13 101 65200 205
1,931.13 101 64250 0
97.97
13?.61
'101 65500 110
620 66700 120
15813
16198
16575
16687
17402
17195
17497
17534
17623
17803
17927
18078
18388
t,032.46
36.65
97.26
187.21
PAGE 5
A A',NT
862.16
1 ,653 .O2
226.88
471.13
1,931.13
230,58
386.69
1,303.17
1 ,135 -20
556.01
4,576.00
3,745.07
83709 PARAI.IOUNT ' S GREAT A},IERICA
COII]RACTUAL SERVICES
386.69 320 80510 220
I,303.17 526 69020 1?0
1,435.20 101 68010 220 1572
556.0't 526 22502
4,576.00 101 68010 220 1212
3,745.07 526 69020 120
OEESIGNS
Il I SC. SUPPI.IES
83711 COUIITY OF SAN I'IATEO
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
18565 50,00 320 80t10 220
50.00
(
VE},IDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes Hsnd !/ritten Checks
cotlP usA
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
CAPITAL EOUIP}IENT
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
CITY HALL MAINTEiIANCE
3,353.61
("(
CITY OF BURLINGA}IEI,JARRANT REGTSIER
06/28/02
VENDOR DETAIL.*' Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
11749
13689
13720
13834
11007
11294
14750
15573
15626
PAGE 4
At'iOUNT
46.52
?,448.89
6,116.81
173.35
113,31
I ,646.90
2,406.26
1 ,420.00
614.09
1 ,262.00
IIUMBER NAI,4E
83686
83688
83689
83690
83691
83693
83694
83696
RADIO SIIACK
8LDG. & GROU}IDS I,4AI NT.
COI1MUNICAT IOIIS
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTE}l
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAINT.
ACCOUNT
06
46
101 65100 190
526 69020 160
2,448,89 619 61460 210 5180
12.25 625 65213 203
11
32
BURTINGA}IE POLICE DEPT
OTFICE EXPEIISE
I.II SC. SUPPTIES
UNI FORI.IS A}ID EOUIPI.IENI
CO.iI.IUN I CAT IONS
8LDG. & GROUNOS I.|AI NT.
EOUIPMENT XAINT.
DUES & SUESCRIPIIO}IS
TRAVEL & I.IEETIIIGS
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
POLICE INVESTIGATIO}I EXPE}ISE
I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS
MTSCELLA}IEOUS
PAL YOUTII PROGRAI.I
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
10'l
'101
73'l
731
110
120
140
160
190
200
240
250
260
292
703
55150
65150
65100
65100
65100
65100
65150
65',t00
65100
65100
65100
22574
?2530
I CBO- INT I L COIiFERENCE OF
iII SC. SUPPLIES
ELECTRO-I.IOT I ON INCORPORATED
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
83692 SUZETTE TOLI FSON
I,{ I SC. SUPPLIES
IZMIRIATI ROOFING
PROIESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S
83695 DAI LY JOURNAT CORP,
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
HI NDERL I TER, DE LLAI4AS
I.I I SCELLANEOI.JS
PENII.JSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
173,35 101 65300 120
443.31 619 61460 210
1,616.90 101 68010 120 1450
2,406.26 101 30400
1,420.00 619 61460 210 5140
644.09 101 61350 240
1,262.00 101 68010 220 1587
83697 PARK. GI LI,4AN CLINICS, INC.
PRISONER EXPE}ISE
15792
300,00 101 65'100 291
300.00
(
83687 coilMAIR ECflAXTCAL SERVICES
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
11773
621 ,63
1 ,069.83
405.04
125.63
536.96
882.30
50.00
194.42
690,92
924.9A
287.93
ln.91
178.26
42.25
15711
CITY OF BURLITGAI.IE!,ARRANT REGISTER
06t28t02
VE}IDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
83672
43673
83671
83675
83683
BURL I NGAITE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
MISC. SUPPLIES
UNITOR}IS AND EOUIP}lElIT
8!OG. & GROUNDS I4AINT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
'101 68010 120 1101
101 68020 '140 2200
101 68010 190 1100
'10'1 68010 220'r3l.6
03910
03964
09019
09213
09439
09518
09720
l0'i0'1
10620
11532
'11568
1 ,552.85
816.37
7n.oa
1,055.00
115.53
50,00
1,09'1.00
21 ,33
ACCOUNT
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
1,211 .30
225 .01
t 66.50
140.83
18.41
63.U
3,746.15
989. 19
225.00
1 ,?65 ,64
5,059.61
1,277.86
!/EST GRq,P PAYMENT CTR.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
JEAN BUCKS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TRAI}III,IG EXPENSE
$6N RO OFT I CE SOLUTIONS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
09072
83676 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
BLDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NI.
09112
225.04 101 64350 210
166.50 101 68010 220 134l+
140.83 101 56?40 260
384.21 101 68010 190 1587
18,41 526 69020 120
3,716.15 618 64520 60r
225,00 101 65?00 220
1,265.64 101 64400 120
5,059.61 101 65100 800
PIP PRINIING
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
83680
83681 DARYL D. JONES, tllc.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83682
SEOUOIA UN I OII I{IGH SCH@L
OTTICE EXPENSE
OFT I CE EXPEI,ISE
'101 65100 1'10
621 6t!1r0 110
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
CAPIIAL EOUI PMENT
83684 CHIEF BILL REITLY
itISC. SUPPLIES
OUES & SUBSCRIPTTONS
TRAI N I }I6 EXPENSE
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
101 65200 120
101 65200 210
10'l 65200 260
73',1 225A5
83685 THE ADAII. H I LL COI.IPA}IY
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAINT.
11571 9.20 101 65200 203
9.20
(
iIIJMBER }IAI,4E
(.(
384.21
83678 STERICYCLE, INC.
SUPPLIES
83579 AEAG - LIABILITY
CLAI}.,IS PAYI{ENTS
63.84 101 65200 112
691 .81
297.38
(
NUMBER NAME
83662
83664
83666
83667
83668
83670
CI TY OF BURLINGAT.IE
L'A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
06t28/02
VENDOR DETAI L
'*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 2
ATlOUNT
4,039.'t3
56,380.39
1 ,072.50
730.86
221 ,687 .40
6,675.00
77,416.18
1 ,058.10
1,280.00
270.63
1 ,767 .96
PACI TIC BELL
CO.I}.IUN I CAT I ON S
83663 STEPHEN J. PI CCHI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83660 K & r,r DISCOUNT LrcflTtNG & SUpp O26t 5
MISC. SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECTALIZED S
43661
760.21
3,278.89
101 66210 120
619 61160 210 5120
56,380.39 896 20280
179.08 10't 65'150 160
1,072.50 101 68010 220 1572
730.86 101 67500 120
221,6n7.40 526 69020 171
6,675,00 101 65200 220
77,416.18 7r1 22587
1,058.10 526 69020 220
1,280.00 526 69020 233
270.63 10r 64250 110
1 ,767,96 320 75350 220
P. G. & E.
UTILITY EXPENSE
POSTAL INSTANT PRESS
I{ I SC, SUPPLIES
CITY OF SAN I.IATEO
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
SAi/ I.|ATEO COUNTY CONVE}ITION &
I'I I SCELLAT,IEOIJS
SYI.IPRO, INC.
OTF I CE EXPETSE
03054
03080
03r68
03188
03353
03366
03431
03465
05536
LEE BUFF INGTON TAX COLLECTOR
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
83669 SEOUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
i4I SCELLANEOUS
03705
83671 TIIiBERLtNE TREE SERVICE, IilC.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
03760
83665 SAN FRAIICISCO IJATER DEPT.
!,ATER PURCIIASES
((
179.08
(
NUMBER NAiIE
83649
43652
83651
83655
83656
83658
'101 55400 200
619 64460 220 5130
621 61150 190
PAGE I
7 ,717 .n
483.33
210.42
11,173.03
264.21
336,506. 15
653.91
4,440.87
5,?96.71
CI TY OF BURL I I,IGAI.IEIIARRANT REGISTER
06t28/02
VEIIDOR DETAILr*. Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks
01030
349.03
6,718.41
680.33
0'105285650 ALPII,IE AL'ARDS, I I,IC.
t.lISCELLAI,/EOUS EXPENSE
83651
ACCOI,JNT
ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
EOUI P}IENT I,4AI NT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
BLDG. & GROUNDS ItA I NT.
CRAFT PRI}IIERS
OFTICE EXPENSE
CCS !]ESTERN POUER &
SUPPLI ES
01842
01457
02036
02110
02157
02248
216,16
3,582.24
4,898.48
3 ,79a,15
1 ,678.00
938.00
28.42
1 ,423,81
2,906.51
61150
80420
80420
64450
61450
483.33 101 61560 290
287,96 lot 66100 110
210.82 620 15000
CITY OF REDI]OOD CITY
OFF I CE EXPEIISE
EOUIPI.,IENT MAINT.
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
co Mut{ I CAI I 0N S
CITY HALL t.IA I IIIE}TA},ICE
10'l
320
320
621
621
110
200
800
160
220
EITII }IG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
MISC. SUPPLIES
83657 T/ATER/II}IANCE PETTY CASH
ITI SCELLANEOJS
DULIII AOVERTISI}iG IIIC.
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
t,.lJ. cRArircER, tNc.
CAPITAT EOUIPI.IENT
MISC. SUPPLIES
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
CAPITAL EOUIPI,iIEiIT
264.24 101 64120 150
327 79440 210
527 66530 190
527 66530 210
527 66530 220
527 66530 800
613.91 320 7A190 1ZO
4,440.a7 896 20282
US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
PROfESS IOI,IAL & SPECIALIZED S
8LDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
PROFESSIOI,IAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S
CO}iIRACTUAL SERVICES
CAPITAL EAUIPi.IE}IT
439.61
279 -41
693,27
205.00
690.43
1
a
f
1
25
93
320 80480 800
619 64460 1?O 5130
619 64460 210 5120
620 66700 800
83659 GRANITE ROC( CO{PANY
STREET RESURTACI NG EXPENSE
02261 535.97 101 66210 226
535.97
((
83653
Ai!OUNT
287.96
0'! 862
0218l,
(
06-21-2002
NAiIE
THIS IS TO
I IICLUS IVE,
TIIE AiIOUNT
OFFI CIALS,
ACCOROANCE
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
CITY OT BURLIIIGA}IEt,IARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . O'I-02
PA6E 10
AMOUNT
$333,085.33(::.>e; wtD ct<-t 3s'24
?rgorB.oS
(
GE}IERAL fUND
CAPITAL IIIPROVEI.IENTS FUND
!/ATER EUI'ID
SEI'ER FUND
SOLID I,JASTE FUIID
GOLF CET/TER FUI.ID
SELF INSURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMEIIT SERVI CES FUND
I NFORI,{AT IO}I SERVICES FUIID
IRUST AND AGEiICY TUNO
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
FUND
101
320
526
527
528
5?9
618
619
620
621
731
896
92,965 .03
6r,702.21
23,951 .93
9,332.07
2,030.00
14,000.63
66,161,45
I,672.41
1 ,913.46
29,101 .59
18,211.70
709 .42
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
IIoNORABLE MAYoR A 0 ClTy CoUNCILI
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBERED FROI.I l THNOUGH 10AllD/oR CLAI S |tUilBERED FRoit 83527 IXROUGH 83648 INCLUSM,TOTAIING I l,l0F $333,085.33, HAVE BEEN cHEcKED IN DETAIL ArD ppnoveo iv THE pRopER
AND III I.IY OPINION REPRESEIIT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST TIIE CITY INI,,IITH IHEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IO{JNTS AS I}IDICATED THEREON.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI,iEIIT
COUNCI L
DATE
DATE
.(
23767
83640 BHP}ISS, II.ICI2002 HEALTHY AGING C 23768
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
83511
(
ACCOTJNT
2,742. 526 69020 210
8,000.00 731 22520
405.00 731 22546
804.00 320 80290 210
520.00 101 68010 220 1100
80.00 101 68010 220 1160
2,291.00 320 80240 210
580,00 526 22502
32.19 526 22502
809.05 731 22564
3,050.00 526 69020 210
2,245.00 320 80420 800
289.U 101 68010 120 1100
(
NUI4BER NAI'IE
83635
83637
83642 r4Tc
83613
83611
8361'
83647
83648
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
CI TY OF BURLIXGA}IEL/ARRANT REGISTER
05/21t02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes l{EM llritten Checks
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
7,319.42
2,742.
8,000.00
405.00
804.00
320.00
80.00
2,291.00
580.00
32.19
809.05
3,050.00
2,215.00
289.81
GBA iIASTER SER IES INC.
CAPI TAL EOUIPI,{ENT
CAPITAL EOUIPT{ENT
CAP]TAL EOUIPiIEIIT
,439.80
,439.81
,439.81
526 69020 800
527 66520 A00
619 64460 A00
23693
23695
23721
23739
23769
23770
23771
23772
23773
?3774
23775
23776
2
2
2
83635 APPLE OIIE EI4PLOYMENT SERVICES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
JOHiI PLANE COI.ISTRUCTIOI/
OEPOSII REFUNDS
83638 PooESTA CoNSTRUCTIOII
I.i I SCELLAiIEOUS
83639 TRG ARCHITECTS
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
JANIIETTE GREER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SNAOER AND ASSOCIATES
M I SCELLANEOUS
83646 EDDCO GROUP
PROFESSIOIIAT & SPECIAL I ZED S
PATION GRADING AiID PAVING
HI SCELLAIIEOUS
KURT HUYSENFRUGT
'.I
I SCELLANEOUS
TORDERER CORNICE I,/ORKS
CAP ITAL EOUIPI,IEI,IT
LUTTICKENS MENLO PARK
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
TOTAL $333,085.33
'(
(
IIUI{BER
'IAI.IE
83520 I.IARSTEN STREET PARTXERS
it I sc. suPPuEs
83621
83625 SCAPES, INC.
CONTRACTIJAL SERVICES
JULIE OAVIS
TRAIN I NG EXPETISE
BRIAiI GATES
TRAI II I IIG EXPENSE
B HETAL FABR ICATI ON
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE[/ARRANT REGISTER
06/21t02
VENDOR DETAIL.*. Denotes Hard Ltritten Checks
ACCOUNT
25,000.00 320 76010 120
97.00 619 61460 210 5180
13,089.47 61A &520 210
190.00 526 69020 190
48.98 526 69020 160
26,518.73 320 80540 220
2,806.62 101 64200 110
1,573.15 621 61150 200
2,667,80 526 69020 210
33,45 620 15000
966.00 10'1 65100 250
70.00 10't 58010 220 1587
.(
83622 ROPERS,IIAJESKI,KOHN & BENTLEY
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
!/ESTERN EXTERI.IIIIATOR CO.IPAI.IY
PROFESSIOI,JAL & SPECIAL] ZEO S
83623 THE I{OBILE STORAGE GROUP
BLDG. & GROUIIDS I.IAINT.
83621 DTRECTV
co liuNrcATI0Ns
22A95
23001
23019
23138
2325!
23376
23110
2357A
23599
23600
23610
236n
PAGE 8
AIIOUNT
25,000.00
97.00
13,O89.47
190.00
48.98
26,518,73
2,806,62
35.00
1 ,573.15
2,667 .80
33.45
966.00
966.00
70.00
s62.90
DATASATE
OFFICE EXPENSE
83627 RECALL- TOTAL I },|FORIIAT I ON MG}IT
IlISCELLAIEqJS
IIOBLE IRACTOR INC.
SUPPL IES
23411
83628 cANo[ FTNANCIAL SERVICES, rNC.
CIIY HALL }IAINTENAIICE
23436
85629 ERLER AIID KALINOL'SKI,INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23531
83630
83626
83631
83632
83634
552.90 619 61160 210 5180
(
35.00 731 22518
956.00 101 65100 260
83633 JEtt SCHWARTZ
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(
NUI.IEER NAI.IE
83610
(
CITY OF BURLINGAXEI.IARRANT REGISTER
06t21t02
VENDOR DETAI L
'*. Denotes tland llritten Checks
PAGE 7
Alt0u T
2,420.50
13 ,004 .14
239.19
4,750.8O
51 .36
1 ,350.00
407.62
325 .78
3,400.00
56.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
5 20.00
280.00
63605 A& L JAIIITORIAL SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83606 VB GOLF LLC
CAPI TAL EOUIPMENT
IEOA
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
83609 ARCfl !'IRELESS
co,o{ull I cAI I oils
COI'IMUN I CATIONS
83607 REEO EOUIPI{ENT CO
8LDG. & GRot'r,tos t{AtNT.
83608
21936
21918
21980
21981
220A9
22092
22363
22801
ACCOUNT
2,120.50 619 64460 220 5170
13,001.44 529 68030 800 4200
239.19 101 68020 190 2200
4,750,80 101 61120 210
22249
83612 AI.IERICAN EUSINESS COMMUNICATIOI/S 22339
PUst I CAT IOI|S & ADVERIISI}IG
83613
EXPRESS PLUMBING
MI SCEI.LAi/EOUS
DEPOSI T REFUIIOS
83611 Z.A.P. I.IAXUFACTURING
TRAFF I C CONTROL I.IATERIALS
CATHER I IIE MOREY
DEPOSI T REFUNDS
83614 ERIC SYMANSKI
COXTRACTUAL SERVICES
SAN MATEO DAI LY JOURNAL
PUBL I CAT IOIIS & ADVERTISING
34.21
17.12
101 66240 ',I60
527 66520 160
360.00
'1,000,00
731 ?2516
731 22520
407.6? 101 66210 222
3?5.78 101 68010 't50 1450
3,100,00 731 22520
56.00 101 68010 220 1587
5,000.00 621 61450 110
1,000.00 101 65200 203
520.00 896 20281
280.00 101 68010 150 14t0
22429
83615 PI TNEY BOLiES RESERVE ACCOTJNT
OFF I CE EXPENSE
22624
83616 FAI LSAFE TESTING
TIRE APPARATT'S iIAINT.
22694
83617 sAt{ tlATEo REGIO}IAL NET|ORK, tNC, 22759
UTI LITY EXPENSE
83618
83619 JENKI NS/ATHE}.IS INS
CLAIMS ADJUST I NG SERVICES
22851
8,242.00 618 61520 225
4,242.00
-(
(
NUI.IBER }IAME
83591
83592
63594
83595 crR
LYNX TECHNOLOGIES
TRAIN I NG EXPEIISE
TRAITIING EXPENSE
TRAI N I IlG EXPENSE
PAGE 6
AUqJNT
250- 00
476.20
2,181.00
545.99
1 ,155.95
5,350.00
'1,567.50
1 ,300.00
305.12
76,17
7,713.48
495.50
(
CITY OF BURLIIIGA!,{EI'ARRANT REGISTER
06/?1/02
VEiIDOR DETAIL,*r oenotes liaM lJritten Checks
ACC0UIIT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
}II SC. SUPPLIES
83593 IBS EUILDIIIG I,IAINTENANCE CO,
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
101 66?10 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
627.00
170.25
470,25
101 66210 250
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
476.20 101 68010 120 1320
2,181.00 619 64160 220 5180
545.99 l0l 66210 120
1,155,95 527 66520 220
5,350.00 101 68010 ,t90 ,1101
20501
20548
20783
21140
21?11
21360
21613
21652
21656
21675
21717
21767
21855
83.34
83.33
83.33
OUICK MIX COI/CRETE
III SC. SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
83596 SPITERI 'S HARDI{OOO
BLDG. & GROTJNDS iIAINT.
DU-ALL SAFETY
TRAINING EXPEIISE
TRAINI NG EXPEIISE
TRAINI}1G EXPENSE
8f598 EHD COISTNUCTION
OEPOSIT REFUIIOS
83599 PORTOSAN
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
83601 CIN6ULAR I,IIRELESS
cofiituN I cAT I oN s
83603 IIANDEGO, I}IC.
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
83604
1,300,00 731 22520
816.82 101 68010 120 'tl+50
305.12 620 15000
76.17 526 69020 160
7,713.48 10r 37010
495.60 101 68010 120 1589
SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897
H] SCELLANEOUS 16,505.00 101 37010
16,505,00
(
815.82
83597
83600 IlI SSION VALLEY FORD
SUPPLIES
83602 TURBo 0ATA SYSTET.|S, INC.
I,4ISCELLANEOUS
19564
83579 CTEARL I]E TROPIIIES
i,I I SCELLA}IEOUS
19679
83580 APPLIED I}.IOUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
8LDG. & GROUNDS MAIi/T.
19767
83581
835r/ ERIC GIESEKER
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
PO!/ER I.,ASIIING SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IzED S
LITTLE TIKES
BLDG. & GROUIIDS }IAI IIT.
ELESCO EMERGE}ICY LIGHT
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
(
ACCoJNT
28.00 101 68010 220 1587
2,222.56 101 66210 210
121,49 731 22560
45.25 l0l 58020 190 2200
711.00 '101 68020 190 2200
280.00 619 61460 210 5180
(
NUI,4BER NAI.IE
83578
83582
83583
81584
83588
83589
(
CITY OF BURL I IIGAI,IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
06/21/O2
VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Xand Lrritten Checks
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
28.00
2,222.56
124.49
45 .25
7',11.00
280.00
3,755,O0
405.88
498,67
1 ,244.36
1 .72
2,376-00
508,26
19191
19833
19972
20060
20201
20216
20246
20301
20339
20159
?51.66
251.67
251.67
SYED ITURTUZA
OFFICE EXPENSE
83585 GE CAPI TAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
COTITRACTUAL SERVICES
83586 AFFINITEL CO,II,IUN I CAT I ONS
COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
co tluN I cAT I0NS
83587 AT&T L'IRELESS
UTILITY EXPENSE
405.88 101 66100 110
w.73
398.94
101 68020 110 2100
101 68010 220 1100
064.36
180.00
320 80410 220
621 64150 160
RACOUET SMI TH
COTITRACTUAL SERVI CES
C. H. BULL COI.4PANY
CAPITAI. EOUIPI.IENI
1.72 896 20281
2,376.00 101 68010 220 1582
508.25 527 66520 800
83590 DAPPER TIRE C0., tilC.
SUPPLIES
20461
125.3? 620 15000
125.32
PEN INSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
REiITS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
RE}ITS & LEASES
101 65210 180
526 69020 180
527 66520 180
(((
CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IEL'ARRANT REGISTER
06t21t02
VENDOR DEIAI Lr*r Denotes tlard trritten Checks
NUMBER }IAI,4E
83562 SHAUGHNESSY ROOF I I,IG, INC.
}1I SCELLANEq,'S
I,{ I SCELLANECT',S
83563
ACCOUNT
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
218.55
112.00
876.21
7,000.00
51.13
348.33
102.00
308.25
678.00
534.95
1 ,9U.50
916.31
116.A4
JOSEPH t/I LL IA}I MCCLAIN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83564 cr |lTAs coRP. #454
Ut.JI TORiIS AND EAUIPMEIIT
212.20
6.35
101 31510
731 2251A
96.88
251,45
526 59020 120
s27 66520 120
112.00 101 680',t0 220 1587
876.24 101 68020 140 2300
7,000.00 101 68020 220 2200
54.13 101 66210 222
CAL I FORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS
COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
83566 ROMIC EIIVIRONI.IENTAL
TRAFF IC CO}ITROL MATERIALS
83565
83567
83568
15686
16055
16911
17141
17153
17197
18103
'18810
18850
19045
19047
COLORPRI NT DIGITAL
MISC. SUPPLIES
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
18473
83570 LABOR READY, INC.
IEMPORARY EI,IPLOYI.IENT SVC.
18659
83571 VERIZOII !]IRELESS I.IESSAGING SERVI 18763
co ltuN I cAT I 0|t s
83572
CRANE PEST COIITROL
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
83569 TONY I S UPHOLSTERY
SUPPLIES
EUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS INC
TRAINING EXPENSE
8357J NATURCLEAII
MISC. SUPPLIES
83574 GOETZ BROTHERS
EOUIPMENT UAINT.
83575 8PS REPROGRAPIiIC SERVICES
MISC. SUPPLIES
102.00 619 64460 210 5110
308.25 620 15000
678.00 526 69020 011
39.37 526 69020 160
531.95 101 64420 262
1,984.50 527 66520 120
916.34 101 68010 200 1581
146.83 520 75110 120
83576 IMAGE AX, tNC.
IT I SCELLANEOUS
19145
2,801.81 731 22518
2,801.81
39.37
(
NUMBER NAME
83550
83551
83552
83555
(
CITY OF BURLI}IGAI.IE9ARRANT REGt STER
06/21/02
VENDOR DETAI L
'*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
101 68020 120
101 66210 130
101 68020 190
101 68020 200
320 78190 120
526 69020 120
526 69020 130
527 66520 260
619 64460 120
619 64460 130
80
85
101 66?10 2?2
526 69020 120
PAGE 3
AIIOUNT
2,071.11
227.27
454.65
450.00
3,63a,61
1 ,243.Q
188. '10
1 ,935.00
49.53
238.12
100.00
ACCOUI,TT
09670
09720
11532
13758
14228
l/r338
405.51
216.31
290.05
112.96
44.32
72.02
71 .91
561.50
136.24
130.26
2200
2200
2200
5130
SEOUOIA UNION }IIGH SCIi@L
OTTICE EXPENSE
DOROTI'IY OI GRADY
TRAFFI C COIITROT I.IATERIALS
I,I I SC. SUPPI.IES
LC ACT I O}I POLICE SUPPLY
UNI TORMS AND EOUIPMENT
CAPITAL EOUIPiIE}IT
227.27 621 61150 110
11020
83553 I,|EYERS, NAVE, RTBACK, STLVER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
11101
83554
259
191
450.00 320 79020 210
005,98
632.63
101 65100 140
101 55100 800
13940
83557 GEoRGE !'. ctPE, Plt.D.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
13950
83558 GERBOTH FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
14021
83559
DANKA OFFICE II.IAGI IIG CO
OTFICE EXPENSE
83556 AT&T
UTI LITY EXPENSE
BURT IIIGAI.iE LIBRARY
EOUIPME}iT I,4AINT.
83560 DEUEY PEST CONTROL
GAS, OIL & GREASE
1,283.42 6?1 64450 110
188.10 896 20281
1,955.00 320 80410 210
49.53 619 61160 210 5180
238,12 101 67500 200
100.00 s27 66520 201
(
8356',]ALL CITY I,4ANAGEI.IENI
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
15595
2,921.30 101 65100 220
2,921 .30
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARD!/ARE
III SC. SUPPLIES
sr4Arl T00LS
8LDG. & GROUNDS I,IAI }IT.
EOUIP}IENT I{AI IIT.
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
}II SC. SUPPL IES
ST1AIL TOOLS
TRAI N I }IG EXPENSE
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
silALt- I@LS
(
NU}'IBER I,IAHE
83544
43515
CITY OT BURLIiIGAI.IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
06/21/02
VENDOR DETAILr*! Denotes Hard lritten Checks
101 66210 210
526 69020 210
527 66520 210
101 68010 110
101 68010 120
101 68020 140
101 68010 190
101 64420 210
101 68010 220
PAGE 2
AI.IOUNT
2,030.00
129.OO
1,893.44
1 ,400.00
5 ,341 .26
2,379 ,00
2,149 .21
857 ,35
45 ,132.98
30.00
83540 SEOUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03556
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
83541 PACIFIC UEST SECURITY, INC.
PROFESSIOiIAL & SPECIALTZED S
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAT I ZED S
03601
83542 T II,4BERL I NE TREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
03760
83513
ACCOUNT
2,030.00 528 66600 2,10
143.00
143.00
113.00
U S POSTAL SERVICE
Tl I SCELLANEOUS
BURLINGAI.IE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OTTICE EXPENSE
UI SC. SUPPLIES
UIi I TOiIiIS AND EOUIPI{ENT
BLDG. & GROUIIOS I.IAI I.II.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,893.11 320 76350 220
1,100.00 101 64250 114
01821
03910
09433
09161
09493
09518
09626
15 .99
611.26
66.01
4.00
32.00
4,5n,00
'1101
1570
2200
1102
1231
SAN I.IATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC.
PR ISONER EXPE}ISE
83546 CALLANOERASSOCIATES
PROTESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
83'47 OCE '. BRU}I I NG, INC.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
83549 OLEIS
SUPPLIES
2,379.00 101 65100 291
2,449.21 320 71171 210
857.35 320 80232 120
10.00 620 15000
83548 ABAG - L IABI LITY
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CLAIiIS PAYT.IEIITS
20
24
618 64520 210
618 64520 601
32
66
793
339
((
(
NUI.IBER NAME
83527 ALPINE A!'ANDS, I I,IC.
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
83531
CITY OF BURL I }IGAI{EI,IARRANT REGISTER
06t21t0?
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes HErd H.itten Checks
ACC0U T
355.00 101 68010 120 1581
72.2A 620 15000
124,51 101 64550 120
66.74 101 (6210 120
181.69
365.2a
83528 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
EOUI PMEIIT I,IAI NT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
LEXI SNEXI S I,4ATTHEU BENDER
MISC. SUPPLIES
?07
236
101 65400 200
619 61160 220 5110
01052
01078
01182
0131?
01313
011i00
01663
01857
02248
02261
02880
31t -51
400.00
19,834.00
11,299,00 101 10700
739.04 620 15000
'101 66210 120
527 66520 130
101 64250 110
621 64450 160
621 64110 220
PAGE 1
A CTLJN T
355.00
443.00
72,28
66.74
546.92
I 1 ,299.00
739 .01
20,548.51
60!,75
't ,033.36
9,022.82
00
00
83529 ED|JARo R. BACoN C0., tNC.
SUPPLIES
83530
83532
81531
83535
HAREOR SAND & GRAVEL
I,II SC. SUPPLIES
sREilroN sAtETY, INC.
t4tsc. suPPuEs
SI{ALL IOOLS
GCS !/ESTERN POL/ER &
SUPPLIES
01862
83536 COI,4PUTER TECHNICIANS, I },IC.,
CI TY IIALL I{AINTENANCE
01987
CI TY OF REDIJOOD CITY
OFT I CE EXPENSE
COMIIUNI CAT IOIIS
CITY I{ALL }.IA I NTE},IAIICE
603.75 621 64450 200
83537 I.r,r. cRAtNGER, I l,tC.
}II SC. SUPPLIES
}1I SC. SUPPLIES
83538
83539
996.19
37.17
529 68030 120 4200
619 64460 120 5130
GRAI]ITE ROCK CO}IPANY
SIDEUALI( REPAI R EXPEIISE
STREET RESURFACI }IG EXPENSE
117.19
109,77
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
US FII.TER
I,{ I SC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
COITTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,623.56
248.78
2t150.48
526 59020 120
526 69020 130
526 69020 220
((
83533 BURLINGAI,IE RECREAT ION DEPT.
RECREATION EXPENSES
557.26
(
06- 14-2002
CITY OF EURLINGAI.IETIARRANT RE6ISTER
FUND RECAP - 01-02
PAGE 1'I
AMOUNT
50,n5 .30
,311 ,790.74
15,388.68
980.00
11,(60.41
201.21
22,174.72
1 ,495 .8
2,007.09
11,613.51
1,701.18
314.5A
9,3',15.44
'15,431.08
4,643.01
$1,490,556.99
5(-'(
NAiIE ftJND
101
320
326
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
625
731
736
896
GENERAL FUNO
CAPI TAL II.IPROVEI.IENTS FUND
!,ATER CAPITAI PROJECT FUND
SEUER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I,JATER FU}ID
SE!/ER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUiID
SELF INSt,RA}ICE FUIID
IACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPI.,IENT SERVI CES FUND
INFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE I.IECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGEI,ICY FUND
BURLINGAI.IE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAI.I
UTILITY REVOLVING TUIIO
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE MAYOR A D CITY COUNCIL:
t oo.oo) VoL D gbt tg baroD
|rb.oo> Viro L\ 8+{fr-
3Xt,t*o.ql
1
THIS IS TO
I NCLUSIVE,
THE AI,{OUNT
OFF I CIALS.
ACCORDAIICE
CERTIFY THAT T}iE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBERED FROI 1 IHRCI,IGI,I 11
Alro/oR cLArilrs |{U}IBERED Fnoi! 83357 TIROUGH 83526 TNCLUSM,TO]ALI],tG I]t
OF $1,490,556.99, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL ANO APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AND I}I iIY OPINION REPRESE}IT FAIR AND JUST CIIARGES AGAINST THE CITY I },I
LIITH THEIR RESPECTIVE Ai.{OUIITS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBI,4ITTED,
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATECOUNCI L
(
.../...t...
FI NANCE DIRECTOi DATE
(
KTIE FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS I{AINT.
PULONE & STROI4BERG,I}IC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
!/I tL IAI.ISO}I CUSTOiI CAEI NETS
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E
IJA R R A N T R E G I S T E R
06t 11t02
(
12.45 10'1 65200 203
87't.80 618 64520 210
227.33 619 61160 210 5210
/+80.00 527 66120 210
(
NUIIEER
83522
83523
83524
83525
NAl.lE VENDOR DETATL ACCOUITr*' Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
SAN I{ATEO COUI,ITY TIRE CHIEFS ASS 23762
TRAVEL & IEETr]IGS 465.28 lol 65200 250
PAGE 10
AIlOUNT
465.28
42.15
871 .A0
227.33
480.00
$1,490,556.99
?3763
23764
23765
83526 DEI.IAKAS PI.UI,IEING ANO HEATING INC 23766
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S
TOTAL
NUMBER NAI.IE
83507
83508
83509
83510
83511
83512
83511
83514
83515
835r7
83518
83520
EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL
PERSONNEL EXAI,I I NAT I OI,IS
FRIEDKEN BECrcR
IIl I SCELLANEOUS
T1I SCELLANEOUS
GREG HAGEY
I'{ I SCELLANEOUS
DAVIO ELI{ORE
MI SCELLANEOUS
EUGEI,IE EORDEGARAY
}II SCELLANEOUS
GEORGE TAN
t.I I SCELLANECIUS
SCOTT STACEY
TRAI II I NG EXPENSE
RAYMO}ID BRAYER
TII SCELLA}IEOUS
JENIIIE BARELA
MI SCELLANEOUS
DAVID GOLDI4AN
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
CI TY }IATIOTIAL BANK
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
(
ACCOUNT
1,731.69 101 61120 121
112
74
00
80
101 31510
731 22515
500.00 731 22525
500.00 731 22525
500 . 00 nl 22525
500.00 731 22525
334.00 101 65200 260
110.00 101 36600
CIlY OF BURLINCAI.IE
U'ARRAITT REGISTER
06t14/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*' Denotes HEnd lrritten Checks
AI,4OUNT
1 ,731 .69
186,80
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
334.OO
110.00
735.00
516.85
367.00
288.00
915 .00
651,161 .50
LAHORI RATI
MI SCELLAIIEOJS
MISCELLA},IEOUS
83516 IIATL II.iP. CORP./SAFETY
IIl I SC. SUPPLIES
23744
23745
?3746
23748
23749
23750
23752
?3753
23754
23755
23756
23758
235.00
500.00
136600
1 225?5
0
T3
516.86 101 65100 120
167,00 't01 37010
288.00 101 68010 220 1230
915.00 731 22516
654,161-50 320 76010 220
,(
a3521 SD FLOORIIIG
tll SC. SUPPLIES 3,322.00 320 79540 120
3 ,322.00
(
PAGE 9
23747
83519 ED NEALE CO}.ISTRUCTION
TIISCELLANEOTJS
23759
(
NUIIIEER i/AI.IE
81191
83492
83493
83194
83495
83500
83501
83502
81503
83505
TLC ADI{I N I STRATORS
IIl I SCELLANEOUS
AT&I IIIRELESS
CO}IiIUN I CAT I ON S
OUEST DISCOVERY SERVICES
PROfESS IONAT & SPECIATIZED S
PODESTA CONSTRUCTION
IiI I SCELLANEOUS
JOHN MEI'IEGUZZI
M I SCELLAIIEOUS
(
ACCOUNT
49.00 101 65200 160
292.33 101 61250 110
2,000.00 101 61120 260
300.00 526 69020 220
500.00 731 22513
525.00 731 22543
500.00 731 22543
495.00 101 58010 120 1t70
1,300.00 326 79?90 210
623.88 618 64520 210
120.00 731 22546
663.27 526 2?502
28.51 526 22502
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE9ARRANT REGISTER
06/ 14/02
VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hgnd I.itten Checks
PAGE 8
AI,IOUNT
175.00
19.00
292.33
2,000.00
300.00
500.00
325.00
500,00
495.00
1,300.00
623 -84
120.00
663.27
28,51
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OFFICE EXPENSE
THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROTJP
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
23156
23169
23591
23637
23638
23653
23660
236A7
23739
23710
23741
236?3
83497 BAY AREA PAREI{T (SFPEN/NO.BAY)
III SCELLAIIEOUS
23636
83198
BRIAN FORTIN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83496 KITIIYSYI,IANSKI
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
I1ARIA PAOILLA
llI SCELLAIIEC|JS
83199 JEAII HORTON
I.I I SCETLANEOUS
FREEMAN-DES I GTIS
MISC. SUPPLIES
6E I NDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS
PROFESSI OIIAL & SPECIALIZEO S
(
63506 HRTI I,IANAGEHE},IT GROI.JP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
23743
595.00 101 64420 240
595.00
23367
83504 ALWAYS PAVI}IG
11I SCELLANEOUS
175.00 101 611?0 031
500.00 731 22543
500.00
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l.r.itten Checks
(
ACCOUNT
720,00 101 68010 '150 1450
741.36 101 65400 140
980.00 327 78534 210
3,375.00 320 80230 210
1,675.00 101 65150 220
133.33 101 65200 203
8,316.00 529 68030 120 4200
16,131.08 736 64571 220
110.49 101 58020 160 2300
6,530.62 101 64420 262
(
CITY OF BURLINCAI.4E
Ti ARRANT REGISTER
06/14102
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
720.00
741 .36
980.00
3,375.00
1 ,675.00
333,33
8,316. 00
16,43',I .08
140.19
6,530.62
569.88
10,068.53
478.7',\
425.00
83478 UNDERGRq'NO CONSTRIJCTION I,IANAGER 22305
PROFESS IO}IAL & SPECIAI.IZED S
83479
G.TAYLOR SIGNS
PUBLI CAT IONS & ADVERTISING
83477 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN
UNI IORiIS ANO EOUI PMENT
BUSI tiESS 2000 IXC
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALI ZED S
SOUTH COU}ITY FIRE
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAI NT.
83482 PETER SANTORA
MISC. SUPPLIES
83/'83 PAR(ING COIIIPAIIY OF AI.IERICA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83480 POSER i{AI TENANCE CORPORAT ION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
83i.81
I]UMBER IIAME
83176
83484
83486
222',\3
22326
22319
22178
22390
??500
22593
22821
?3071
23112
VERIZON IJIRELESS
COMI.IUN I CAT IONS
83485 GLASER AIIO ASSOCIATES
TRAI }IING EXPENSE
22921
844A7 cRI TICAL SOLUTTONS, INC.
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
23035
83488
III1AGI ST I CS INTER}IAIIONAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
125.00
300.00
277
?92
101 64400 210
731 22525
101 65150 110
101 65100 220
40,068.63 320 76010 210
178.71 101 64400 250
88
00
JOE EOJUES
TRAVEL & }.IEETINGS
83489 I. RAI/DOLPH GRANGE
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALI ZED S
i'I SCELLANEC[,,S
831.90 Pl TNEY 80!/ES
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
23128
512.00 101 65100 220
512.00
(
22216
(
IIUHBER I,IAI.4E
83473
CITY OT BURLINGAMELJARRA{T REGISTER
06/14/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Dehotes Hand Lrritten Checks
12,713.58
1,337.00
326 79530 210
526 69020 210
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
1 ,375 .00
651 .00
223.18
384,56
11,528.97
828.59
219.99
66,71
283.61
1 ,053.66
13,390.54
843.44
2',I9.00
83461 LYNX TECIINOLOGIES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
83162 LARRY ANDERSOII
I SCEt, LANEOT.JS
a3463 RICIIARD COIIELL CO.
CAPITAL EOU IPMENT
83461 SAN FRA}ICISCO I,JATER DEPT.
SF!/D TEASE
83466 Ro[.|AN & LqrcEE, ntc.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALTZEO S
83467
20754
83465 IIARDISON KOiIATSU IVELICII &
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
20938
ACCOUNT
1,375.00 326 75170 210
651.00 101 64350 031
223.18 101 65200 800
384.66 101 66210 181
11,528.97 32O 76010 210
20t01
20739
20963
21171
2194a
22006
22089
JACK VA}I ETTEN
POLICE INVESTIGATIOII EXPENSE
VB GOLF LLC
MI SCELLA}IEOUS
RECREAIIOII PROGRAU EXPENSE
2117a
83469 CITICORP VENOOR FINANCE, INC.
EOUIPIENT MAINT.
21521
83170 F I LTERFRESH COFFEE EXCELLENCE
BLDG. & GROUIIOS I,IAINT.
21623
83471 i4AN0EG0, I C,
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
21855
83472
828.59 101 65100 29?
249.99 101 64420 262
6,71 101 55200 200
283.61 621 61150 190
529 36711
529 68030 213
813,44 101 66100 800
1,053.65 101 58010 120 1587
11 ,425.11
1,965.10
GMAC PAYI.IENT PROCESSII]G CENTER
CAPI TAL EAUIPI'IENT
A3474 ARCH I/IRELESS
COMMUN I CAT IONS
RENTS & LEASES
207.16
11.81
101 65100't60
101 68020 180 2200
83475 ONE IIORKPLACE
iII SC. SUPPLIES 16,329,04 520 79580 120
16,329.01
((
14,050.68
20716
83468 ANN MUSSO
TRAIN I NG EXPEI]SE
22171
(
NUMBER NAI{E
83148
83451
LABOR READY, t iIC.
TEI.IPORARY EI,IPLOY}IENT SVC.
I,i I SC. SUPPLIES
sURTON ' S FIRE APPARATUS
TIRE APPARATUS },IAINT.
CEI'IIRAL GARDEI] CENTER
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
11I SC. SUPPLIES
(
DETAI L ACCOUNT
405.00 101 64420 210
00
40
526 69020 011
526 69020 120
510.00
270.00
101 65100 190
320 80190 210
870.00 621 64150 110
5?6.24 621 61150 200
313.03 101 65100 160
(
C!IY OF BURLINGAI{EI'ARRANT REGISTER
06/ 14/0?
VENDOR
'*! Denotes tland l.rritten Checks
PAGE 5
AHOUIIT
405.00
1 ,220.10
4,000.00
604,030.00
378.00
208,99
4,429.26
887.65
175.00
810.00
870.00
526.24
83.07
313.03
83116 11I LLS.PEN I }ISULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546
PROFESSIOIIAL & SP€CIALIZED S
83447 18659
1A790
'18970
19083
19356
19367
19130
1950?
19561
20141
20216
20300
20301
678
542
BAY AREA PAVI I,IG CO
CONTRACTUAT SERVICES
83449 DENl,lts J. A oRoSO
COT,ITRACTUAL SERVICES
83450 ANG IIE!/SPAPERS
PUELI CAT IONS & ADVERTISING
8315?
83454 T0 AI4ES
TRAINI NG EXPEIISE
83155 JoHil CAHALAN, ASLA
BLDG. & GROTJNDS AIIIT.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S
83156 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
OFF I CE EXPENSE
83157 GE CAPITAL
CIIY NALL MAINTE}IAIICE
83158
4,000.00 101 68020 220 2200
604,030.00 320 76010 220
378.00 101 64200 150
4,129.25 320 76010 ?10
887.65 526 69020 ?10
475,00 101 65200 250
SIGNET TEST ING LABS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
83453 AI.IERICA PRINTTTG
PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S
41.53
4'l .54
101 68020 120 2200
320 78490 120
8]459 AI&T UIRELESS
co ltuN I cAT l0[s
83460 OFFICER HEATHER RU}IEAUGH
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
20389
748.11 101 65100 120
74a.41
208.99 101 55200 203
(
NIJI.IEER NAI.IE
83433
83135
83438
83139
83410
83411
83412
83443
83444
THE ADAI,I-N I LL CO.iPANY
F IRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
CAMI NO REAL PET CLI}.IIC
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
41.07 101 65200 203
4 ,096.89
-988.05
526 69020 230
527 66520 230
3,??4.30 10'1 65100 220
1,294,50 101 68010 220 1587
{
CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE
L/A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
06t11t02
PAGE 4
ELECTRO-IIOT ION I IICORPORATED
PUMP EOUI PI.IENT REPAIR
PUMP EOUIPT'IENT REPAIR
83436 ALL CITY MANAGEI4ENT
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
83417 PENI NSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11571
11577
11007
15595
15711
15761
15787
15827
16687
17128
17388
AI4OIJNT
41 .07
3, 108.84
3 ,228.30
I ,294 .50
3r7 .52
9,704.53
1 ,723.10
132,37
57 .36
313.88
233.82
I,It LLBRAE LOCK SIIOP
OTTICE EXPEilSE
I'II SC. SUPPL IES
},II SC. SUPPLIES
307.46
11 .51
101 65150 110
101 68020 120 2200
619 61460 120 5150
VALLEY OIL CO.
SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ! ZEo Col,4l'lUN I CAT Iolls
III I SCELLANEOTJS
14 D LI}IEN SERVI CE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
CSIP USA
OFF ICE EXPENSE
COMUUNI CATIONS
SUPERIOR TRAXSMI SSIONS INC
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAINT.
9,704.53 620 15000
1,723.10 731 22564
132.37 101 65200 220
35.73
21 .63
101 64420 110
621 64450 160
GOLDEN NURSERY
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
11I SC. SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
i,I I SCELLANEOUS
101 68020 120 2200
3?0 78,/,90 120
320 80190 220
526 69020 120fil 22560
118,82
155.94
13.25
29,91
25.96
233.82 101 65200 203
83115 ASSOCIAIIO}I OF ENVI RONI.IEIITAL
0t Es & suEscRIpTIoNs
1n63
100.00 101 61400 210
'100.00
(
VENDOR OETAILr*. Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
95.00 101 65100 120
95.00
15739
(
CITY OT BURLI},IGAMEIIARRAIIT REGISTER
06/ 11t02
VENDOR OETAIL
'*r Dehotes llond L/ritten Checks
PAGE 3
83421
83422
83425
83429
246.28
1 ,457.81
38.36
213.16
641 .00
39,76
1,831 .58
108.25
2,003. 19
246.81
90.93
82,&
699.06
922.42
AMOUI]I
4,467.95
72.74
202.64
205.76
296,91
30.63
2,449.18
300.00
1 ,701.11
ACCOUNT
BURLI GAII1E REC. OEPT./PETTY CASH
OFF I CE EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
COMMUN I CAT IONS
BIDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
TRAVEL & I,4EETINGS
IIl I SCELLANEOUS
110
120
160
190
220
250
1100
1691
1100
2200
1344
2100
03910
09143
09439
09116
09560
09626
09790
09902
10557
535,85 101 68020 120 2200
72,74 101 55200 't',I2
202.64 529 68030 120 4200
t0t 58010
10't 68010
101 680',t0
101 68020
101 68010
't01 68020
731 22531
526 69020 120
527 66520 120
619 61160 120 5170
SAN }IATEO LAI/N }10!/ER SHOP
I'I I SC. SUPPLIES
BLDG. & GROUIIDS MAI NT.
83426 oLE ' S
FIRE APPARATUS I,4AINT.
83127 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDI.'ARE
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAIIIT,
LYNGSO GARDEN I'IATERIALS
uIsc. suPPuEs
83123 STER I CYCLE, INC.
STJPPLIES
GARY H. 0LS0N, PH.o.
PERSONNEL EXAI.4INATIONS
134.61
71.12
'101 68020 t?0 2200
101 68020 190 2500
296.9'1 625 65213 203
50,63 '101 65200 203
INTERSTATE TRAEFIC
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
TRAFFI C CONTROL MATERIALS
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
IRAIiI I NG EXPEIISE
101 65200 111
101 66210 2?2
320 80470 210
526 69020 260
83430 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC
MISC. SUPPLIES
300.00 101 61420 121
132.17 101 65200 1't'l
CAL.STEAI1
I,II SC. SUPPLIES
iII SC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
83432 ROMEO PACKING CO
I'I I SC, SUPPLIES
Il I SC, SUPPLIES
11318
97i.17
269.54
10r 68020 120 2200
529 68030 120 1200
I ,212.71
(
NUMBER NAME
(
535.85
132.17
83124 T}1T ENTERPRISES
MISC. SUPPLIES
09670
10256
831r28
83431
(
NUMBER NAI{E
83413
83411
83118
83119
CI TY OF BURLIIIGAI.IE
U'ARRANT REGISTER
06/ 14/0?
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes ltard t'r.itten Checks
PAGE 2
K & I,' DISCOUNT LIGHIING & SUPP 02645
MISC. SUPPLIES
I'I I SC. SUPPLIES
291
759
73
71
101 66210 120
619 64160 120
ACCOUNT AI'1OUNT
1,051.44
50.65
4,613.01
615.20
t ,333.00
730.00
2,657.28
20
I"II LLBRAE LUI.IEER CO.
MI SC. SUPPLIES
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
rIRE APPARATUS TIAI I.IT.
SIDEI.JALK REPAIR EXPEI{SE
III I SC. SUPPLIES
101 65200 120
10't 68020 190 2200
101 65200 203
101 56210 219
526 69020 120
02898
101 .76
146.63
62.03
'r2.50
23.34
83415 P. c. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
GAS & ELECTRIC
03054
a3416 PACIFIC EELL
UTILITY EXPENSE
03080
83417 PERSoNAL A!]ARDS, tNC.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
05145
INFORMATION SERVI CES OEPT.
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
03378
SEOUOIA ANALYT1CAL LABS
IItSCELLANEOUS
03536
83420 T III1BERL I NE TREE SERVICE, I}IC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
0t760
4,643.01 896 20281
515.20 r01 68010 120 1587
1,333.00 101 65150 220
730.00 ,?6 69020 233
2,657.28 320 76350 220
10.42
10.23
101 66210 170
527 66520 170
(
316.40
NUUBER NA}|E
83401
83102
83403
83404
83/.05
83106
83108
83109
83410
83411
GRAYIS PAINT, BURLI}IGAI'IE
MISC, SUPPLIES
(
ACC0U T
2,113.00 526 69020 233
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE
l.IARRANT REGISTER
06/ 14/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*' Denotes Sard gritteh checks
PAGE 1
83]57 * U S POSTAL SERVICE
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
0382r
01025
010?7
01236
01337
01507
0'1551
01637
02157
02261
024',10
02599
10.09
101.82
14.56
42.25
68020
65200
65?00
15000
66700
65213
200 2100
202
203
AI.IOUNT
?,113.00
56.12
168.72
57.49
193.66
1 ,433.24
80.00
2,301 ,63
121 .61
471 .38
1 ,237 .30
648.33
ACE HARDI/ARE
OFTICE EXPEIISE
14I SC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
BAYSHORE I NTERNATIONAT TRUCKS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
BILLIS UPHOLSTERY
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAIIIT.
CI TY OF BURLII.IGAi{E
I,I I SCELLAIIEOTJS
E!'II/G I BR I GAT I OI,I PR@UCTS
I,I I SCELLAIIEOUS
GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
SIDETIALK REPAI R EXPEI]SE
STREET RESURFACING EXPEIISE
HASELBACH SURVEY I },IG I I'ISTRUMENI
8LDG. & GROU}IDS I.IAI NT.
MISC. SUPPLIES
IRVINE & JACHE}.'S IXC.
iIISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
57.49 101 65200 203
193,66 101 65200 203
BURLII,IGAIIIE AUTO SUPPLY
EOUI PII1E T I.,IAI NT.
VEHICLE I.4AI NT.
IIRE APPARATUS IIAINT.
SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
't6. 't5
136,96
98.09
1 ,401.20
130.21
47.67
101
'10'l
101
620
620
625
130
203
80.00 101 32100
2,301.63 101 64530 15',1
'121.61 101 68020 192 2200
99
39
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
75.78
1 ,161 .52
'lot 68020 190 2200
320 80?31 120
61a,33 10't 64560 290
35
7
3
02625 404.57 620 15000
404.57
(
56.12 619 64460 120
r01 65100't10
r0'l 65400 120
526 69020 120
525 69020 130
83107 EURLINGAME C}IAI'I8ER OF COI,4I.{ERCE
CHAMBER OF COI.4MERCE PMT.
83112 IiO!/ARD JONES BATTERIES, INC.
SUPPT IES
J
./Fl
@
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SI'BMITTED
June 24.2
APPROVED
AGEI\tDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE 8-5-02
8j
rO:
DA,TE:
BY
BYFRoM: Robert BeIL Human Resources Director
srrBJEcr: Ratification of a 3.33Va Salary Increase for City
Staff is recommending that the Council ratify a 3.3%o salary increase for City Manager, James Nantell. Thisincrease should be effective with the first pay period of July, 2002.
BACKGROUIT{D:
City Manager Nantell's contract with the City calls for an annual increase of 3.3%o if approved by the CityCouncil' The annual increase is to occur with the first pay period of the fiscal year, whicir begirs on July l.Therefore, Council, by approval of the consent calendar, L ratifying the salary agreement and granting CityManager Nantell a3.3Yo increase.
BUDGET IMPACT
The cost of the salary increase is expected to be $4,6g1.15.
AJ-
7
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 8-5-02
TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BY
DATE:Julv 25.
APPROYED
FRoM: Parks & Recreation Director (55&7302)
SUBJECT:Request for Our Lady of Angels Men's Club to Alcoholic
Beverages at Bayside Park on September 1, 2OO2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council review the request to serve alcoholic
beverages at Bayside Park on September 1,2A02 between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. and decide
whether or not to approve this request. If approved, staff recommends the folLwing conditions:
(1) only beer and wine be served; (2) alcoholic beverages to only be served in plastic or paper
cups; (3) no open containers of alcoholic beverages may be taken from the deiignated area;
(a) dl regulations regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages to be followed; (5) the Men,s Club to
provide a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional insured in case of alcohol
related problems. Council may wish to consider whether any park security should be required of
the group.
BACKGROUND:
The Men's Club of OurLady of Angels has reserved the western soccer field area of Bayside
Park in order to offer a picnic for parishioners and their families. The Club has also requested
permission to serve alcoholic beverages to adults attending this event. It is staff s undeistanding
that the alcoholic beverages would be served with the meals provided at the picnic.
Municipal Code Chapter l0 20 prohibits the serving or consumption of alcoholic beverages bygroups in public places.wilhout special permission-frory tle City Council. Such se.uirg"oi -'
consumption of alcoholic beverages is conditioned by Code Seition 10.20.0Ib(l-4). (fj Onb
beer and wine to be served by groups, with the permission of the City Councit;'tZl'oniy pfurii"
9YPs.9r similar containers be used -(3) consump:tion is to be restrictei to a, approiea dria; anO(a) ail sales restrictions are to be followed. Thb City Attorney has also suggeited that an '
insurance certificate be required from the goup.
This request has been approved in each of the past two years and those picnics were each
conducted without incident. Staffbelieves that the five (5) use conditions proposed in the
Recommendation above will satisS the Municipal code sections noted.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A - Application for use of Parks & Recreation Facilities
BUDGET IMPACT:
None
8k
BY
:BUrlingame Parks & Recreation Department
850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame CA 94010
Telephone:(650)558-7800 Fax:(650)696-7216
Application & Permit for Rental & Use of Parks & Recreation Fa i titi
Date 1 zr,o
Organization Representative's
Address Address I z-z t-lfrul\rzo "2 .J
t]City $o12cpa6r.nq'zip 9<Zo,oCityh/lrlar,,l,*'t,,t zip qyo/0
Phone: Day- fvg.-Phone: Day S-?*1-olou Eve.-
ls this organization a registered non-profit group possessing a 501(c)(3) tax rating? _yes _no
---- 7
Contract #:
l(.lr tc-Est. Attendance:Q,
&
Its t _)
hoursall including\\A D.-H ou rS &set-up clean-up)t
Adu(Youth_
Zooz-Day(s) of the Week
ne#
Will beer, wine or champagne be served? _yes _no
Will a commercialcaterer be used?tf
Nature of Event
Will it be sold?'_yes _no ABC permit #
Event Date(s)
Facil
Equipment
Tables: #:_ _ Coffee Pots (100 cups)TVA/CR
Chairs: #:_ _ Overhead Projector Screen _ Field Lights Other:
Diagrarn of set-up and any requested equipment must be turned in to the Parks & Recreation otfice atleast one week prior to th e event. Applicant's driver's license will be photo copied onto the application.
Pool
_ Short Course
_ Long Course
_ Large Pool
-
SmallPool_L
Meeting / Banquet Rooms
_ Auditorium _ Kitchen
Lounoe I Lounoe ll
_ Art Room _ Stage
_ Depot _ Social Hall
_ Patio _ Dance Studio
Othe Smoking is prohibited in all City facitities.
For Dept. Use Only!Amount Due Amount Paid Date Received bv Special lnstructions
Facility Charge
Bldg. Attendant
Tables & Chairs
Other Equipment
Securitv
Custodial
Bond
Total
PAYMENT OF ALL FEES AND CHA,RGES ARE DUE UPON SIGNINGTHIS CONTRACTII
Applicant hereby agrees to hold the City of Burlingame, its City Council and Commissions, the individual members
thereof, and all officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from any loss, damage, liability, cost of expense that may
arise in any way by such loss or occupancy of park or recreation facilities.
I hereby cerlify that I have read the Rules and Regulations for Rental & Use of Parks & Recreation Department
Facilities and will see that my activity will abide by these rules. I also realize that the facil ity contract is granted with the
understanding that the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Departrnent has the right to cancel the contract if the agreed uponfacility is needed for a city sponsored event.
l, the undersigned, hereby that I will be personally responsib on behalf of the applicant for any damages
sustained by the facility,rring through the occ d by the applicant.
Aoolicant's Sionature Date P arks & Hecreation Dent. Renresentativc
7
-
Microphone _ Other:
AGENDA 81ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 8-5-02
TO: EONORABLE MAYOB AIYD CITY COTJNCIL
DATE: JIW29,2002
APPROVED
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager
650-558-7222
BY
suBJEcT: Grant Applications and community survey of Interest 2fi)3 Shuttle Bus Program
RECOMMENDATION: This is for information only.
BACKGROUIYD: Three shuttle buses currently run in Burlingame. Two commuter shuttles-BART Colrrra
to Burlingame employers and CalTrain to Burlingame employers operate Monday-Friday during the morning
and evening commutes. These shuttles arc 75Yo funded by grants through the City/County Association of
Governments (C/CAG) and the San Mateo County Transportation Auttiority. The third shuttle, which uses the
non-connnute hours of one shuttle, operates between Burlinganre hotels and Burlingame's Broadway and
Burlingame Ave. shopping areas. In addition to mid-day operations Sunday through Thursday, it operates
Friday and Saturday evenings. This shuttle is funded by the hotel ta,r reserve.
New funds will soon be available through C/CAG's deficiency planning progfitm. As you may recall, the crty
is paying $65,000 to this effort ,N otr required share of the cost. I have mei with staff fro- tir. peninsula
Traffic Congestion ReliefAlliance (The Alliance) to explore modifications to the shuttle program and discuss
requests we have received for north area shuttle service when the BART Mitlbrae stationopens. In additiorU
we expect that once BART Millbrae opens, the two existing commuter shuttles will be running identical
routes, and there will be pressure from our funding sources to drop one of them.
As a result of our discussions, The Alliance has proposed a four-shuttle progmm that continues the mid-day
hotel shuttle, reroutes ofthe present commuter shuttles with one serving the East Bayshore hoteycommercial
area and the other serving west Bayshore commercial and retail areas down Rollins Road and passing
Broadway and Burlingame Ave. The fourth shuttle would be routed to serve the north area ofthe city,
including stops at Peninsula Hospital and Sisters of Mercy plus to-be-determined residential stops. This
tentative plan has been discussed with the Chamber CEO, Georgette Naylor and the Convention Bureau CEO
Anne LeClair, and tlrey will be involved in the planning.
The Chamber of Commerce and The Alliance, to determine potential interest in the shuttles, are conducting a
survey that is included in the Charnber newsletter and was recently run in an advertisement in The
Independent. The survey is also on our web site and the Chanrber's web site. City employees have also been
surveyed. The planned August time line for filing the application necessitated that we proceed with the survey
at once so the results could be included in the application.
BY
STAFF REPORT
Fug O5 02 O4:sZp FNDERSON HONDR SERVICE 6so 843 1934
MEM o
To: Meg Monroe
From: Dave Mani
826 Alpine Ave
Burlingame, CA., 94010
RE: Ser Back Variance Appeal
Date: 8/05/02
Dear Megl
p.1
Please inform the Citv Council ,l?l-l *S to.have the Appeal process for the Set-BackI::::" " 826 Alpine Ave., Burlingame, scheduled for.t'fr" O.toU", Zls Councilmeefing.
Thanks for your attention to tlxs matter RECEIVED
AUG - 2 20a?
''ll^',i,i#3'JiFf 'u
Dave Mani
826 A.lpine Ave., Burlingarne
("
MEMO
HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL:
PLEASE SET A PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 FOR THE
BELOW MENTIONED APPEAL.
THANK YOU. CITY CLERK
ANN MUSSO
To: Sean O'Rourke, City of Burlingame
From: Dave Mani
826 Alpine Ave
Burlingame, CA., 94010
RE: Appeal to City Council
Date: 7l3ll02
Dear Sean:
Enclosed, please find a check for $250 for an appeal to the Burlingame City Council
The following is a letter of intent to appeal the City Council on findings by the Planning
Commission regarding denial of an proposed addition on my property at 826 Alpine
Ave., Burlingame. Date of Planning commission meeting was July 22,2002.
In addition, I am also appealing the resolution by the City of Burlingame that my inJaw
unit does not fit the guidelines for the current Amnesty program.
I wish to have a copy o{, or be able to make copies of, every document on file by the City
of Burlingame that relates to my property, or me, personally. These documents may
include plans on file with the building department showing a footprint of my property as
it existed in 1952, and any relevant documents regarding complaints, or letters of
communication between the city of Burlingame, or it's representatives (Fred Palmer has
documents I would like to see), and myself.
Lastly, I wish to see a copy of the Inspector's Report indicating why my property was
denied Amnesty approval, and the specifically, 1) what evidence was lacking that
determined the kitchen was not present in 1952 in my inJaw unit. 2) what evidence
was used to allow the bathroom as being present in 1952.
Please let me know when I can begin to collect these documents.
I can be reached at the following phone numbers: Home-650-347-6123; Work-650-
843-6040.
Dave Mani
very
CITY OF BURLINGAME
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CASH COLLECTIONS DIVISION
08/02/02 10:53am REFERENCE - L2636-L4-3
MISC BATCU 979 - UTILITY BATCH 978
FROM : DAVID MANI-826 ALPTNE
ACCOUNT : l-013 6600
ZONING & SIGN PERMITS ].01.36600
CHECK 2 50. OO RECEIVED BY COUNTER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FEES RECEIPT
Subject Address:
Received for:
-
Application to Planning Commission for:
-
Variance
Desisn Review
-
Conditional Use/SPecial Permit
-
Condominium Permit
-
Fence/Sign Exception
-
Use Determination/Ambiguity Hearing
-
Antenna Exception
-,I1ill
sid e Area C on stnrction PermiUMinor Mod i fi cation
y' Aooeal Fee
-
Titte 25 Tnning Code (+ $3.00 postage)
-
Title 22 - Signs
General Plan (+ $5.00 Postage)
-
Specific Area Plan (+ $3.00 Postage)
Zonins Mao
-
Sign P-ermii Fees p AID
-
Photocopies ' ',.
?SS?_ postage
,r,,)G /
,..._.oU** Total:
/ccsJrm (rciscd 1n6/99) il\\ r ."
250.00
2 50. 00
(ACCT . 101-3
Date:
(#84)
l
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.00
210.00
250.00
10.00
2.00
25.00
10.00
1.50
IM
tt
TOTAL PAID
I
Ir
BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY
Burlingame Publtc Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes
June 18,2OO2
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
Trustees Present:
Staff Present:
m
Cecile Coar, Jane Dunbar, Andrew
Gurthet, Mary Herman, and Catherine
McCormack
Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
The meeting of June 18,2OA2 was called to order by president
Mary Hprman at 4:30 pm.
and s Funds
Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants subject to
corrections. M/S/C (Gurthet/Coar)
IV. Mlnutes
The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the minutes of the
May 14, 2002 meeting. M/S/C (McCormack/Gurthet)
V. Correspondence
Correspondence mailed in the packets ,was reviewed.A. State Budget Cuts - The City Librarian noted that it is
possible that the funds for the Public Library Foundation will be
cttl 43o/o. This means Burlingame Public Library's share would be
$25,OO0 less than the $6O,OO0 it usually receives. The funds from
the Public Library Foundation come from the State and are
charged off as revenue to the Librar5r.B. Trustee Description - This information provides prospective
Librar5r Trustees with an overview of the Trustee's duties ald
responsibilities.
VI. From Floor -No one from the public attended.
48o PdrmroxRoad. Burlinqwne. CA 9 4oro- 4o83
Phone (65o) 558-7 47 4 . Fw. (65o) j4z-6295
I
,f,
:
VII Reports
A. Clty Librarian's Report - A1 Escoffier, City Librarian,
reviewed his report highlighting the following issues.
1. Children'sActivlties
a. "Reading Road Trip USA" is the theme of the
program for school age chiidren. Children need to read and
report on 6 books in any manner they choose.
b. Teen Summer Reading Club - Books have been
selected for middle and high school students. Also, teens
may participate in a mural workshop by Precita Eyes
Muralists from San Francisco.
c. "Mouse Tales" is the program for the pre-
readers and requires parent participation.
2. Patriot Act - Peninsula Library System is developing a
policy on the Patriot Act to be implemented by all libraries in
the PLS system including the community colleges. Mary
Minnow, a librarian and an attomey specializing in library
law, has been hired by PLS to help with drafting the policy.3. Easton Branch Workshop - On Saturday, June 8th, a
public workshop was held at Easton to review the work to
date since the March workshop. Hal Brandes, architect,
presented the conceptual plan, including alternate features.
Renderings illustrating the concept of the interiors were also
shown to the attendees.
4. Personnel - Interviews are being hetd to filI the 25
hour position in Technical Services held by Paul l,echich who
retired recently after 34 years of service to the Library.5. Easton Branch - Sue Reiterman is weeding the adult
collection of all books that have not circulated for a period of
5 to 10 years. Trustee McCormack suggested contacting
Paul Constantino and advise him that these books are
available for him to send to the library in Khe Sanh, Viet
Nam.
Foundation Report - Jane Dunbar
1. Board Vacancies - Lisa Rosenthal and Mark Lucchesi
are being invited to join the Foundation Board of Directors.2. Elegant Affair Branches Out - The theme of the event
is Southwestern; cuisine will follow this theme. A jazz trio
will perform throughout the event. Board members will be
requested to make a contribution of their choice. For
example, one board member is offering a month of Sunday
desserts. Richard T. Dwyer and Co. and AMS Bekins have
offered to underwrite the event.
B
Library Board of Trustee Minutes
June '18, 2002 2
C Trustees CALTAC Conference Report - Gurthet, Herman
and McCormack - The Trustees who attended the conference
felt that they had benefited from the event both in the areas
of library information and new ideas for our own library.
Some ideas the trustees offered were as follows:1. Periodical Room (Compact Shelving) - Use this room
as a teen area. The City Librarian noted that originally the
periodical room was desigrred as a study room and in the
future it may be possible to change its usage.2. Technology - Add more computers for public use if
possible. The City Librarian advised that the pLS Internet
Committee is reviewing software programs that would be
used system wide to reguiate the time of a patron,s usage.
Once the program has been selected and installed the 1ibrary
may add more public terminals.
3. Foreign Language Collection - If possible determine
how often our foreign language collection is circulated,
particularly Japanese children's books, to make certain the
library is meeting the cultural diversities of its patrons. The
City Librarian noted that the top ten magazines in
circulation are in a foreign language.
Unfinlshed Business
A. Patriot Act - The City Librarian reviewed the policy
statement he wrote for the Burlingame Library and had reviewed
by the City Attorney, Larr5r Anderson. Trustee Gurthet felt the
policy, if approved, should be posted. Trustee Dunbar proposed a
motion that the Trustees approve and post the Librarian's written
statement of policy until the PLS policy for all libraries in the
system has been written and approved.
M/S/C (Dunbar/Gurthet)
B. Easton Plan of Servlce - The Trustees approved the Easton
Plan of Service which was written by the City Librarian, Al
Escoffier. M/S/C (Gurthet/Dunbar) The Trustees will send a copy
of the Easton Library Plan of Service with a personal note to their
individual City Council person.
VIII.
Mary Herman
Catherine McCormack
Cecile Clark
Andrew Gurthet
Carol Rossi
Mike Coffey
Rosalie M. O'Mahony
Joe Galligan
Mary Janney
Cathy Baylock
3Library Board of Trustee Minutes
June 18,2002
Ix
x.
C. Board Recognitlon - The Trustees will host a dinner on July
23'd to welcome Carol Rossi to the Board of Trustees and to thank
Jane Dunbar, outgoing Trustee, for her many years of service.
New Business There was not any New Business.
Announcements
Trustee McCormack suggested using the marble flooring from the
old library for the new fireplace at Easton. It is also possible that
the marble in question could be used for the counter tops which
are designed to be similar to the ones at Books, Inc.
XI. Adiournment
The meeting adjourned at 5:30pm. M/S/C (Dunbar/Gurthet)
The next meeting of the Library Board of Trustees is scheduled for
July 23, 2OO2 at 4:30pm in the Library Conference Room.
Respectfully Submitted
04,/.f,.
Alfred H. Escoffier
City Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes
June '18,2002 4
Library Security Issues
Experience based on 5 years with a Security System
Securitu and the Libra ru Enuironment
Part of the Library's mission is to be a "professional and welcoming
environment." This is a very importalt part of what we do. Some ways in
which we facilitate this: all public desks are staffed at all times; all public
phones are staffed with a live person at all times; regular customer
service training is offered to all staff; we empower staff to make decisions
at the point of contact with our patrons in many cases within some
broad guidelines.
Management staff are on-call by cell phone should a supervisor on site
not be able to handle a situation.
The Burlingame Police Department is extremely cooperative in offering a
prompt response to all calls for assistance. They have encouraged us to
make reports on situations so that we can refer back to them later
should another incident occur.
In terms of security, we are a public building. As such we have
experienced: theft of personal property, threats to sta_ff and other library
users, inappropriate behavior (specilicatly outlined by our Patron
Behavior Policy, e.g.: smoking, eating, loud noise, rolling cigarettes,
i.unning, rough-housing, etc.), ald more rarely: exhibitionism, sex acts,
etc.
We also experience children being left in the library for long periods of
time, and need to approach parents with our concern about their
children's safety. Many library stall members are parents and
understand the inappropriateness of leaving children in a public
building, even in a relatively safe environment like Burlingame.
Therefore, our policy on security has of necessity needed to protect not
only the public but also the staff. Some ways in which we do this
include:
. Approaching problem patrons with two stalf rather than just one;. Key cards for back room offices;. Key cards for entry to the building arranged by level ofaccess;o Personal and building security is every staff member's
responsibility.
Keu Card Sustem
The key card system has done several major things for us:
1) Very few sta-ff now have regular keys to the building.
2) We no longer pass out keys to the public.
3) Key cards cal control access at certain levels and certain
times for staff and volunteers.
4) We can track when someone has come into the building
when they should not have done so.
5) Key cards can be canceled quickly to deny access to
terminated employees.
6) Key cards eliminate most of the necessity of rekeying the
building.
7) Police/Fire have keys to the building via an exterior
mounted lock box. They also have key cards to get
through the building.
8) The Facilities Maintenance staff have alarm codes, keys
and key cards for emergencies.
Manaqina the Ke u Card Sustem
The Administrative Secretary manages the key card system for the
library. Several other key staff has also been trained.
The Key card manager's responsibilities include:
, . Issues key cards,
o Cancels lost cards,
o Passes out temporary cards to those who have forgotten their cards
on a particular day.
Staff seems to like the key card system for a variet5r of reasons:
r No need to carry keys for the library
. Key cards can be easily replacedo Staff feels secure in back office areas, even during evening and
weekend hours
o Staff have an ID at a-11 times they are in the building
Sta.f.f BUA-in-for KeA Card Sustem
Buildinq Emerqenctes
Depending on the type of emergency, management sta-ff is on-cdl 24 l7 .
Key staff have ce1l phones, etc. The Police Department Dispatch
maintains a call list of key staff in the area to ca-ll in an emergency.
Some recent emergencies: patron left behind and locked in building;
Communit5r Room door left unlocked; leak in windows from rain; leak in
restroom equipment; leak of fountain which flooded floor below, etc.
Other emergencies include: trouble on the Iire alarm panel (usually
means a power outage); general power outage (need to close ald secure
building, happens about 6 times a year).
With the advent of the Facilities Maintenaace group, they deftly handle
our building emergencies. I appreciate their promptness and this has
relieved a burden from the management staff.
Summary
The increased security of the Library since we opened in 1997 has been
a.n asset in running the building efficiently. It is clear where the public
can go and where the staff can go in the building. Key cards allow for
policies to be enforced on who enters the building and when. Rather than
creating a fortress-Iike atmosphere, the increased security allows the
staff to do the job we have hired them for in comfort and security.
Al Escoffier
June 20,2OO2
The City of Burlingame
CITY HALI. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
cALtFORNtA 9401G3997
www.burlingame.org
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, July 2,2002
Commissioners Present: Jim Mclver, Chair
Jim Evans, Vice Chair
Russ Cohen
Lisa De Angelis
Commissioners Absent: David Mayer
StaffPresent:
staffAbsent:
Visitors:
Frank Erbacher, Assistant Public Works Director
Fred Palmer, City Attomey's Office
Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, police Department
Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, public Works
Mark Metcalfe, 401 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Marika Metcalfe, 40 I Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Rebecca Knudsen, 315 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Frank Kelly, 321 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Joe McVei gh, 329 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Julia McVe idh, 329 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Bob Hocker, 1610 Chapin Avenue, Burlingame
Margaret Lee Blunt, 1538 Btrlingame Avenue, Burlingame
Michael Murdock, 1228 Floribunda Ave., #9, Burlingame
Sylvia Rubel, 1469 Bellevue Ave., #803, Burlingame
Doug Weaver, I l0l Douglas Avenue, Burlingame
Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, Burlingame
Ur*;t-
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKTNG COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, Julv2,2O02
l. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Chair Mclver.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners present.
4. CI]RRENT BUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4.1.1 Minutes for June 13, 2002, were submitted and approved.
4.1.2 Appeal Regarding Vehicle at 1l0l Douglas Avenue - Public Hearing
Mr. Palmer advised this is a public hearing requested by Mr. Weaver as a follow up to a code
enforcement violation of an inoperable vehicle parked in Mr. Weaver's driveway. The City
requested he move the vehicle; however, Mr. Weaver said he would not. The Commission should
find whether or not the vehicle is operable. If inoperable, then make the determination how much
time Mr. Weaver has to remove it and then prepare an Order to remove the vehicle. This action
will allow Mr. Weaver one more opportunity for appeal which will be to the City Council.
From the floor, Mr. Weaver stated that the vehicle has been in his family since 1972; and he is
restoring it. However, he recently broke his hip which has slowed down the restoration work. The
vehicle is parked on commercial property, and he has seen car agencies park non-licensed cars
almost into the street. It is not a nuisance or an eyesore and is registered with the DMV as a non-
operating vehicle. He also asked who made the complaint. Mr. Palmer advised that when the
hearing is concluded, he may ask for this information in writing. Mr. Palmer then advised that
the orciiance applies to all zones, including commercial. The registration has to do with operation
of the vehicle on the street. Under City ordinance, he is free to park the vehicle in his garage or
within a fenced rear yard.
Comm. Evans stated that the City has a right to enforce its ordinances regardless of how long the
violation has existed. The Commission has determined that the vehicle is not operational and
Comm. Evans recommends giving Mr. Weaver two weeks to remove the vehicle. Comm. Cohen
stated that Mr. Weaver is lucky that he has room on the side of his property behind the fence to
place the vehicle. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Evans/De Angelis) to authorize the City
to take action after two weeks, July 16, 2002, instructing Mr. Weaver to move the subject
vehicle. Unanimously approved by the Commission.
The Cily of Bulihgame Page 2
TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMTSSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, July 2 ,2002
4.2 DISCUS$ON ITEMS.
From the floor, residents expressed a desire to slow the traffic down but not necessarily with a
Stop sign. One resident suggested two Stop signs since traffic ftom both Ralston Avenui and EI
Camino Real is too fast. Cars parked along Occidental blocks the driver's view. They also need
enforcement at this site. 30 mph rate is too high. There are a lot of pre-schoolers walling to day
care in this neighborhood.
Mr. Erbacher advised that an engineering radar speed survey in March showed the 85%-lle is 34
mph; and because it's residential, it was posted at 30 mph. rryhen establishing the speed limit, they
also consider road width and number ofaccidents that have occurred. Since 1992, there have been
two accidents. Also, the traffic count does not warrant stop signs. comm. Evans recornnrends
using more traffic enforcement. Mr. Erbacher will check the blocks for parked vehicles later in
the day and check site distances. He will also check Occidental for accident reports. Chair Mclver
stated more data will be obtained and provided at the next meeting. This will be a Discussion
Item. Mr. Erbacher advised that trotices will be sent again for the next meeting, and staff will
add those in attendance today to the list.
4.2.3 staff request for four 24-minute Parking spaces on 500 block of primrose Road, west side
Mr. Erbacher advised that city Hall parking lot is full due to an increased number of employees;
therefore, short-tenn parking is needed for visitors to city Hall during business hours. The
neighbors were noticed so they could provide their input.
4.2.1 Millbrae BART Station - Traffic and Parking Impacts on City sfteets - Possible Effects and
Traffic Commission Hearing Schedule
Chair Mclver stated that he and Comm. Cohen met to evaluate approaches in contacting affected
businesses in &e immediate area of BART. The Commissioners want to have plans of action
available, install parking meters in adjacent industrial area, and merchants/businesses suggested
time limit (4-hour) parking to allow the Police Department to make only one enforcement sweep
a day. comm. cohen also suggested adding signage to read "No BART parking Allowed.,' Someof the merchants are willing to pay for these sigrs. comm. Evans suggesied addressing the
problem now to get everything in place so when the problem develops we will be ready to effect
the plan(s). Mr. Erbacher stated the commercial-industrial area @ollins and Adrian Roads) needs
to be noticed about the City enacting, for example, 4-hour parking limits with the initial hearing
at the commission level if needed once BART opens, then it could be presented to the citycouncil. They will then hold a public hearing before final approval. comm. Evans suggested the
initial Commission hearing be held in September. Comm. Cohen stated the light commlicial area,
california Drive area, will be addressed later. comm. De Angelis suggesied a public meeting
and/or distribution of educational materials for each of the three residential-commercial areas to
determine distinctive problems. For the next meeting, Mr. Erbacher will provide a more detailed
map of the various areas and the commission can then assign a plan for each area.
4.2.2 Occidertzl and Chapin Avenues - Speed Issue and Stop Sign Request _ Letter
The AU of Bu,lingame Page 3
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, July 2, 2002
From the floor, Mr. Murdock stated that parking on the street is scarce due to a new aparfinent
building on the corner of Primrose Road and Floribunda Avenue. Mr. Erbacher advised that the
24-minute limit is only until 6 p.m., Monday through Friday. It was moved and seconded
(Comms. Evans/De Angelis) to concur with staffs recommendation to change four l-hour parking
spaces to 24-minute time limits on the 500 block of Primrose Road. Unanimously approved by
the Commission.
4.2.4 El Camino Real and Bellevue Avenue - Request for Traffic Signal - I-etter
Mr. Erbacher advised that there is a site distance issue here; so by copy of his letter to the
petitioner, he will advise Caltrans staff who has jurisdiction. City staff and State staff will
coordinate a resolution.
From the floor, Ms. Rubel stated it's a dangerous intersection and bad accidents have occurred-
at this site.
4.2.5 Add Parking Spaces on Magnolia Avenue, west side
Mr. Erbacher stated that only two diagonal spaces may be available on this site. The concern is
that two lone, diagonally-parked vehicles may become targets for through traffic. Unless there
is a demand, he recommends no action at this time. Comm. Evans supports staffs
recommendation. The Commission concurred.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS
5. 1 Request for Red Zone at ll34 Douglas Avenue - ktter
Mr. Erbacher stated that the work order was issued 6119102 for this installation.
5.2 Dwight Road at Lexington Way - Request for Stop Sign - E-Mail
Mr. Erbacher advised that the speed study supported25 mph residential speed. This site would not meet
Stop sign warrants. The accident apparently occurred when someone pulled out in front of another car.
Staffhas met with the petitioner with this information.
5.3 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail)
No response from petitioner as yet. Sgt. Cutler submitted th e Selective Enforcement results which showed
l0 citations issued.
5.4 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concems (petition)
petitioner attended traffic calming meetings with no further contact. This item will be on hold for the
Traffic Calming Program.
The City of Budingame Page 4
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesdav, Jul y 2,2O02
6. FROMTHEFLOOR
7.1 From Staff to Commission
7.1.1 Traffic Engineer's Report
6.2 Ms. Abbey stated that on June 13,2W| she requested enforcement of speeal limit, truck weight
load limit and fire safety; but Adeline Drive is not on this agenda. She was pleased that the higtr
dry grass at Sisters of Mercy was cut down. She stated she would also like iarger bumps placed
on Adeline Drive by Poppy Drive to slow traffic and keep cars from straddling the line. Sisters
of Mercy has no Stop pavement marking although they do have a Stop sign at their exit which is
not effective enough. What is your report; what patrols has the Police Departrnent made; she has
not received any communication regarding these issues since the last me;dng; and how is it that
her community doesn't receive any notification about these meetings?
Sgt. Cutler advised that Adeline Drive has been on the active list for selective enforcement for
at least the last six months. Mr. Erbacher stated that at the last meeting he had explained that
large bumps on the street could cause a higher hazard since they are more for control at an
intersection. They will install the small bumps in a single line. The Stop sign at Sisters of Mercyis on private property which is not the City's jurisdiction. The main issue at this site is
enforcement. The truck weight limit is not controlled for local deliveries. Agenda notification was
not necessary for her neighbors this month. Ms. Abbey advised that sometimes Sisters of Mercy
places directional a-frame signs on the roadway. She also requested a traffic count for various
neighborhood streets. Mr. Erbacher advised that traffic counts are done for potential or real
accident issues. She also requested the radar trailer be placed on the downhill side of Adeline
Drive between Poppy Drive and Hoover Avenue during morning and afternoon hours. Sgt. Cutler
will display the trailer when it's available.
Mr. Erbacher reported that the Oak Grovei California signal is still being coordinated. The
Burlingame High School is installing more porable classrooms and is allowing on-site parking
where space is available to alleviate the demand for street parking. Also, he advised that the new
Traffic Engineer has been selected and will arrive on July 29.
Page 5
6.1 Mr. Murdock would like a reevaluation of the traffic markings at Primrose Road and Floribunda
Avenue where a Camaro driver has been using it as a sideshow stop. Also, from Califomia Drive
to Primrose Road, Floribunda Avenue is now a road test route for Texaco mechanics. It has
become unsafe, and Floribunda Avenue has become a major thoroughfare between EI Camino
Real and California Drive. The existing Yield sign is inconsequential; other markings are needed.
Mr. Erbacher advised that a double cenGrline being irstalled on Primrose Road will make it more
enforceable when a driver goes over the centerline. Comm. Evans suggested updating signage if
needed.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS.
The City of Eu,tingame
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMM]SSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, Julv2,2002
7.1.2 Staff Action log - Auached to Agenda.
7.1.3 Burlingame Parking Study
Mr. Erbacher stated this will be prepared later this year.
7.2 From Commission to Staff
7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests
7.2.1.1 Comm. Cohen asked if the sound wall will be continued on Rollins Road. Mr.
Erbacher advised that it will probably be done when Caltrans works on the auxiliary lanes
for Highway 101 in the next two or three years.
7.2.1.2 Comm. Cohen asked about the safety of turning left when exiting from Bank of
America on chapin Avenue. Mr. Erbacher stated this is a wide street and is manageable
for left tuming.
7.2.2 Comments and communication
Chair Mclver stated that Millbrae's next BART Impact Meeting is scheduled for July 11 at 7 p.m.
Comm. Cohen stated that Burlingame High School is having a meeting on luly 7 regarding their
activities.
7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, August 8, 2002 meeting
No expected absences.
8. INACTTVE ITEMS.
8.2 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a trafFrc study of area to determine if
traffic-calming measures warranted
sgt. cutler submitted the selective Enforcemen, results which showed that 10 citations were issued for
Howard. This item is on hold for the Traffic Cakning Program.
8.1 Request for trafltc control on Dwight Road
City Council approved construction of the new gateway improvements for Dwight Road and will be
going out to bid. The City is asking City of San Mateo for joint cost sharing to update the signals at
Feniisuta Avenue. Sgt. Cutler submitted the Selective Enforcement results which showed that 3
citations were issued. This report only covers a two-week period since the last meeting on June 13'
The City of Bulingame Page 6
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Tuesday, July 2, 20A2
8.3 1007 Chula Vista Avenue - Irtter requesting Speed Limit Signage for Traffic-Calming effect to
constrain speeding drivers
This item is on hold for the Traffic Calming Program.
8.4 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive
at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOp sign on
Trousdale at Quesada Way. Results of Traffic Data Gathering - Speed limits
Sgt. Cutler submitted the Selective Enforcemen results which showed that24citations and 8 warnings
were issued.
8.5 Concerns about For Sale signs on vehicles parked on El Camino Real at Mills/Peninsula Hospital
Comm. Evans suggested removing this item from the Agenda.
9. AGENDIZE FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
Item 4.2.1 - Discussion Item
Item 4.2.2 - Discussion Item
Item 4.2.3 - Discussion Item
Item 4.2.4 - Send ktter from Staff
10. ADJOURNMENT. 9:45 p.m.
The City of Burlingame Page 7
MEETING MI}ruTES
Burlingame Parhs & Recreation Commission
Thursday, 1vne20,2002
The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Ed Larios at7.O2 p.m. in Conference Room "N' at Burlingame City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present Dittmaq Heathcote, Kahn, Larios, Lawson, Minderman, Muller;
Youth Commissioners Martindale, Warden
EricksonCommissioners Absent
StaffPresent:
Others Present:
Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz
Dorothea Chrisman, 1608 Devereaux Drive, Burlingame
George Chrisman, 1608 Devereaux Drive, Burlingame
Sally O'Connor, 1556 Balboa Way, Burlingame
MINUTES
Mnutes of the May 16, 2002 regalar meeting of the Commission were approved as submitted.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Ray Park Use Policy Director Schwartz summarized the discussion from the
May 2002 meeting, when the Commissioners tentatively approved a policy for the use of Ray
Park by youth sports groups. This plan was distributed to the Park's neighbors and main user,
Burlingame Grls Softball League (BGSL). The policy states that:* Youth sports events (tournaments, league games, etc.) at Ray Park
anticipating over 150 players at any one time should be relocated to a more
suitable location
* The alternate location should be selected by the Parks & Recreation Dept., on
a case by case basis, based upon the activities needs as well as the other on-
going community activities* All youth sports leagues need to adhere to the City of Burlingame's noise
ordinance
t No fireworks shall be allowed at Ray Park
Dorothea Chrisman told the commissioners that she is in favor of recreation, but that Ray Park is
a little neighborhood park and BGSL creates too much of an impact on the neighborhood. She
said that a fire vehicle had to stop in the middle of the street last year, while responding to an
emergency at her home, because of the traffic caused by the League.
George Chrisman asked the commissioners to place tighter control on events at the Park. He
talked about the tournament this past weekend. Games began at 9:00 am, but players and
coaches began soft toss batting practice drills at 7:00 am Saturday and 6:30 pm on Sunday. Mr.
Chrisman also complained about the use of a public address system in use for the tournament.
He stated his support of kids in the park, but opposed the early morning start. Mr. Chrisrnan also
stated that the parking situation this year was vastly improved from past years.
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, June 20, 2002 - page2
Sally O'Connor said that this weekend's tournament created less impact on the neighborhood
than in past years. However, she is very concerned about children playing on the corner of
Balboa and Devereaux. Children have chased balls out into the street and nearly been hit by
cars. She also complained about the noise from the pitching machines and batting practice.
After much discussion, a sub-commiuee of Commissioners Heathcote, Lawson, Minderman and
Muller was formed. The sub-committee will consider the use policy items from the previous
meeting, as well as the issues of pre-game practice times, use of public address system, noise
from soft toss practice and batting practice netting. The sub-committee will report back to the
Commission atthe July meeting.
B. Community Center & Temporarv Teen Center. Schwartz stated that the City
Attorney's office will be looking at some properfy acquisition issues during the summer. A
discussion of potential sites for a temporary facility ensued. The commissioners asked staff to
research the sites mentioned, with the assistance of a commercial realtor, and consider the
options of leasing as well as purchasing space. Youth Commissioner Martindale suggested that
the temporary site should not be located on a school district facility because teens would be less
likely to attend.
C. Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) Report Youth Advisory Commissioners
Martindale and Warden reported that no meeting has been held in the past month, but that the
YAC has conducted several successful events. These included selling cotton candy at Art in the
Park and the Dive-In Movie at the Aquatic Center. The YAC will also be providing a barbecue
at the Music in the Park concerts in July.
D. Senior Resources Handbook Commissioners Kahn and Dittman reported they have
finished the research phase of the Handbook revision and are now working on phase II,
production. Distribution is scheduled for late sunmer.
E. Commissioner's Handbook The commission adopted the Commissioner's Handbook,
which will continue to be revised and will be given to all new commissioners. The handbook
includes information about the City, the Parks & Recreation Dept., the Brown Act, tips on how
to be an effective commissioner and more.
F. Youth Commissioner Interviews Schwartz stated that only one application has been
returned to date, from current Youth Commissioner Warden, suggested the commissioners
consider the application and interview additional applicants in September. Chairman Larios
made a motion to reappoint Youth Commissioner Warden to o second term. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Heathcote and was passed unanimously. The recommendation will
now go before the City Council. The Commissioners thanked Youth Commissioner Martindale
for his two years of service and asked if he would serve the Commission in an interim role for
the summer, until another Youth Commissioner could be appointed. Martindale agreed to serve
during the summer, but pointed out that he will be attending the Univeristy of Southern
California in the Fall.
I
\
A.
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, June20r2OO2 - page 3
PTIBLIC COMMENTS
There were no coflrments from the public.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Vacation Dates Citing the summer vacation schedule, Commission
Lawson moved to cqncel the August meeting. Commissioner Kahn seconded the motion which
passed unanimously. Commissioner Dittman said she will be unable to attend the luly meeting.
REPORTS
Capital Improvement Project Status - Director Schwartz reported the following:
1. Ray Park Improvements. Staff is considering a plan to renovate, rather than
replace, the existing restrooms at Ray Park. The renovation would allow disability
access and would save thousands of dollars.
2. Cuernavacca Park. Staff has received nearly all of the Proposition 12 funds and
will begin working with the project architect, John Cahallan, in the next month. The
project calls for Cuernavacca Park to receive a new park restroom, shade structure
and seating areas.
B. Parks and Recreation Division Report - In addition to the attached report, Schwartz reported
that a new small area of the Recreation Center opened within the past week as a place for
teen programs to meet before going on outings. Schwartz also noted that over 900 tickets
have been sold for Burlingame Night with the Gants on June 21s.
Commissioners
1. Commissioner Dittman reported that she received complaints from the public that the
Aquatic Center Hotline has not been updated on a regular basis. Schwartz agreed,
stating that he has heard some of the same complaints, and that procedures have been
changed to ensure more frequent updates. A discussion followed involving other
pool issues, such as security, impact on the neighbors and parking.
2. Commissioners Kahn and Heathcote complimented the Parks &. Recreation
Commissioner's training held in Burlingame on June 1,2002. The training included
sessions on conflict resolution and how to conduct a meeting. Schwartz invited the
commissioners to attend the 2003 CPRS State Conference in San Jose.
Recreation Division Revenue Report - Schwartz pointed out that the revenue for fy
2002-03 is ahead of that for 2001-02 by approximately $70,000. The report (see
attached) also shows $100,000 under the BAC account for 0l-02. Those funds were only
collected to assist the new club in a start-up capacity and were then transferred to the
Club's account once they were established.
C
D
3. Heathcote stated that he attended the Lions Club breakfast at Art in the Park. He also
commented on how well the Washington Park ball diamond turned out.
I
\
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, June 2012002 - page 4
NEXT MEETING
The next regular meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission will be held on Thursday, fuly
18,2002 at7:00 p.m. at City Hall.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at
9:14 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
q4
Randy Schwartz
Director of Parks & Recreation
MEETING MINUTES
Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, July 18,2002
The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
chairman Ed Larios at7:o2 p.m. in conference Room "A" at Burlingame City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Commi ssi oners Present:Erickson, Heathcote, Kahn, Larios, Lawson, Minderman, Muller;
Youth Commissioners Martindale, Warden
Dittman
Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz
Recreation Supervisor Little; Diana Warden, Burlingame
MINUTES
Minutes of the June 20, 20A2 regilar meeting of the Commission were approved as submitted.
Commissioners Absent
StaffPresent:
Others Present:
OLD BUSIIYESSA. Rav Park Youth Sports Use Policv Director Schwartz reviewed the work of the
committee to craft a policy for youth sports groups using Ray Park. This policy was distributed
to the Park's neighbors and main user, Burlingame GirlJ Softball League tgCSrl. Schwartz also
read an email from Ann Wallach, one of the Park's neighbors, rrppo.tit g the poiicy. The
commissioners clarified a few ofthe items and discussed severalblthe iisues, ru"h u, parking,
parking enforcement and use of the public address system. Commissioner Heathcote made a
motion to adopt the Ray Park Youth Sports Use Policy as amended. Commissioner Muller
seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. The approved policy reads:* Youth sports events (tournaments, league games, op"ning Oay events, etc.) at Ray park
anticipating over I50 players at any one time ihould be reloiated-to a more suitable locitton (a
typical Satur*ry of softball games : approx. 140 players). The alternate location should be
selected by the Parks & Recreation Dept., on a case by iase basis, based upon the activity's needs
as well as the other on-going community activities.
':' No games shall be held on Sunday, e^cept for one tournament per year. AII Sunday games must
be approved by the Director of Parks & Recreation and notices must be sent to the houses within
300 feet ofthe Park.* Regular season games shall not begin prior to 10:00 am and no tournament games shall beginprior to 9:00am. .Practice shall not begin more than one hour prior to the first gime of the day.'." In accordance with Parks regulations, no amplified music will be allowed in-the park. Witir the
approval ofthe Director ofParks & Recreatiorq a public address system may be used to announce
- line-ups and players, but may not be tested o. used prior to g:30am.t' Youth sports events myst have a representative on site to attend to parking issues caused by theevent. The league shall inform the Parks & Recreation Department who will be serving ai theparking representative.* Fireworks are prohibited,
J
Par}s & Recreation Commission
Thursday, July 18, 2002 - page 2
B. Communitv Center & Temporarv Teen Center. Schwartz stated that he has been in
contact with a couple of real estate agents regarding the properties identified by the Commission
as potential sites for a temporary teen facility. The old Route 66 property is available for
$15,000/month. The antique store at 783 Califomia Drive is available for approximately
$6,d00/month. Schwartz will be inspecting the 783 California Drive property on July l9u.
Because (1) the facility meets the general criteria previously established (location, size, low
impact on neighbors, etc.), (2) the commissioners feel that the rental cost is within reason and (3)
the Commission is not scheduled to meet again until September, Commissioner Kahn moved
that"Director Schwartz,tf he believes that the property meets the program needs of the teens, has
the support of the Parlcs & Recreation Commission before the City Council".
C. Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) Renort Youth Advisory Commissioner Warden
,"port.d e-a meeting until Septembel but-they are providing a
barbecue for the Music in the Park concerts and made $1,000 profit from the cotton candy sale at
Art in the Park.
D. Senior Resources Handbook Kahn reported that Commissioner Dittman, who is
currently on vacation, is inputting the data for the handbook.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the public.
I{EW BUSINESS
None
REPORTS
A. Burlinqame Aquatic Center (BAC) Programs & Maintenance - Recreation Supervisor
Little informed the com*issioners of the BAC's hours (M-F: 5:30am to 9:00pm; Sat: 8:30am to
5:00pm; Sun 11:00am to 8:30pm), the diffrculties of maintaining a pool with so little down time
and itre wide variety of programs offered by the City and the Burlingame Aq-uatic Club. As many
as g00 people *. ih" facility on a busy day. The City will soon assume fu1l maintenance of the
facility, aside from the boilei room and any necessary capital improvements. A meeting between
the City, School and Club representatives is scheduled to work out the specific responsibilities
and poiicies of the user groups and to establish maintenance standards.
Chairman Larios commented that the Club is still allowing its members to use the South gate of
the pool, causing parking issues and tracking more dirt onto the deck. Little agreed that thecfyb
wilineed to buy into thJpohcies and police their membership. Larios agked about the possibility
of having a City employee on deck io .nr*" policies are followed during all pool operating
hours, lniludingtimei wnen only school or clubs are using the facility. After much discussion, it
was agreed thalthe policies stroutd be established and enforced by the City and that meetings be
held between the *.r gro,rps, formally twice each year and informally as needed, to ensure
compliance. In response to a question frorn Commissioner Lawson, Little explained the
emergency call-down Procedures.
C.
D.
E.
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, July 18,2002- page 3
B. Caoital Improvement Project Status - Director Schwartz reported that staff is working
with public works on renovating, rather than replacing the restrooms at Ray Park and at
Cuernavaca Park. This direction should save several thousand dollars, of the Proposition 12
funds, which can then be used on the other improvements to Cuernavaca (shade strucfure, seating
areas, etc.).
Parks and Recreation Division Reoort - See attached.
Commissioners
1. Larios complimented Schwartz on his year as Director of Parks & Recreation.
Recreation Division Revenue Report - See attached.
NEXT MEETING
The next regular meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission will be held on Thursday,
September 19,2002 at7:O0 p.m. at City Hall.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjoumed at
9:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Randy Schwartz
Director of Parks & Recreation
aeY
City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreatien Dept.
850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
phone: (650) 558-7300 . fax: (650) 696-7216
recre ati on@buriin g arce. or g
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 15,2002
To: Parks & Recreation Commissioners
City Council
From: Randy Schwartz @4f
Re: Monthly Report
Parks Division
1) Tree planting - seasonal residential tree planting is in progress (80 trees).
2) New employee - in process of filling a vacancy in the crew at Bayside Park.
3) Memorial bench - A memorial bench was donated and installed at the Dog Exercise Park.
Another resident has expressed interest in funding a second dog drinking fountain in memory
of a family member.
4) State bond grants - documentation has been completed and confirmed on two grants related
to Proposition 12 (year 2000). These funds will be used on Cuernavaca Park.
5) Tree pruning - the tree pruning in Ray Park is complete.
6) Breast cancer walk - Pershing Park was used as a rest/refreshment stop as part of the recent
three-day breast cancer walk.
Recreation Division
1) Art in the Park 163 artist booths with the addition of Teddy Bear Lane sponsored by the
Rotary Club and 32 information booths from local and city organizations.
2) Teens: YAC sold cotton candy at Art in the Park netting $1,000 profit. The first Dive-in
Movie, presented by the Teens and Aquatics Sections, was held showing movies by the pool,
with 100 people tuming out. The first PRFN event of the summer attracted 80 participants.
3) Preschool: Almost all classes for Summer and Fall are filled with long waiting lists. Toddler
Adventures has 4 classes going and 10-14 parent/child couples in each class. We needed to
add additional classes to both My First Art Class and Half Moon Music.
4) Burlingame Night at the Giants: 882 Burlingame residents, family and friends sawthe
Giants win 4-3.
5) Sports: Strong numbers in all of our surnmer sports: New track and field camp (30) - New
Boys High School Basketball class (53), Girls High School Basketball class (28, and Girls
Volleyball camps jumped from (22 in session 1, 33 in session 2).
6) Spring Classes: 3,891 participants in 404 classes conducted (similar to last year).
Upcoming activities:
Music in the Park - Sundays in July
2od Annual Novice Su/im Meet - August 3
Dive-in Movie "The Sequel" - August 3
Fall Resident Regisfration - August 22
Fall Non-Resident Registration - August 26
Community Golf Toumament - September 27
I
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
Burlingame City Hall
Conference Room A
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
Monday July 22,2002
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran called the July 22, 2002, special meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 6:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele,
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; City Attomey,Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Syed Murtuza
UI. APPROVAL OF'AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
IV. STUDY SESSION
CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED SAFEWAY PROJECT _ CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW 69,747 SF COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR SAFEWAY AND WALGREEN'S AT I42O _ I45O
HOWARD AVENUE AND 249 PRIMROSE ROAD; PROJECT INCLUDES REZONING, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS, PARKING DIMENSION VARIANCE FOR PROJECT PARKING LOT AND PARCEL
MAP FOR LOT MERGER AND RECONFIGURATION OF LOTS; PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES
RECONFI OF CITY-OWNED PUBLIC P
Chair Keighran noted that this was a continuation ofthe study session to discuss the Safeway project, the purpose of
this meeting is for the Commission to review the options presented by the applicant and to discuss the direction of
the project. Since this is a continued meeting from the study sessions held on May 23,June 11 and July 2,2002,
there will be no public comment. Commissioners noted that this project is important to Burlingame, the applicant
has done a good job providing information, no\v is the time for action, time to look at something for the good of
Burlingame in the long term.
Commissioners reviewed the four schemes submitted by Safeway as well as an altemative presented by the Citizens
for a Better Burlingame. Commissioners comments on each alternative:
Alternative D-3: Scheme shows a park area to be dedicated to the City, would prefer that this area stay in Safeway
ownership with Safeway being responsible for maintenance; regarding fuck circulation, the large trucks would have
to enter via Fox Plaza Lane from Primrose and back into the truck loading areas, and can exit either via El Camino
Real or Howard Avenue; this is pretty much the same scheme we have seen all along with some change to the
Primrose edge, the location of the truck dock creates a strong visual barrier, will inhibit pedestrian access to
downtown; would like to see loading docks closer to El Camino Real, would prefer a scheme with trvo buildings;
like the park and landscaping on Primrose, but could do more; like the retail component and park on Primrose, but it
is still a massive building and still does not provide City parking near Fox Plaza Lane and Primrose Road.
Commissioners Boju6s and Keele arrived at 6:05 p.m.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Special Study ^Sessron Unapproved Minutes July 22, 2002
Alternative F-4: It doesn't appear that the location and shape of Walgreen's will be feasible for them, this proposal
is short on parking in the City lots, only 6l public parking spaces are proposed; on the positive side, there are two
buildings which reduces the mass, breaks up the parking areas and provides some parking close to Fox Plaza and
Primrose, the loading for Safeway is further from Primrose; however, the way it is laid out it would be difficult to
make Walgreen's operable; does not represent what was suggested, retail is not shown along entire Primrose
frontage, Safeway store is still too large; the truck loading area for Walgreen's may not work, it looks tight, this
proposal makes Walgreen's a second class citizen, there is very little direct access to Walgreen's, cars can only come
in northbound from El Camino or enter on Howard in front of the Safeway store.
Alternative PC3: This option has too much retail on Primrose, its too massive and bulky, don't like all of the
parking in one spot; the access with the loading off of Howard is not functional, there is no loading proposed for the
Walgreen's store.
Alternative D-4: Concerned that Walgreen's will not accept this alternative, would like to speak with a
representative of Walgreen's to see what they want, don't understand why they do not want to locate there; this
scheme creates a tie to the pedestrian environment by having Walgreen's in the location at the corner of Primrose
and Fox PlazaLane,the way the building is articulated is a plus; the parking is broken up; some of the loading is
taken away from Fox Plaza Lane.
Citizens for a Better Burlineame Alternative: Like that this option has the parking lots separated, the location of
Walgreen's at the corner of Howard and Primrose is pedestrian friendly, like the location of the loading docks closer
to El Camino Real; concern that the trucks go from Howard through the middle of the parking lot and exit onto El
Camino Real; having two buildings decreases the mass and bulk; the parking orientation may not work for Safeway,
maybe it can be turned to meet Safeway's criteria; trucks exiting can only go north; could the store entrance be
moved to face Primrose rather than Howard, would create a link to downtown for pedestrians; there have been other
schemes with fewer loading docks, could this scheme be modified with fewer loading areas; like the public parking
at Primrose and Fox Plaza Lane, provides a continuation of Lot J and the other public lots which run parallel to
Burlingame Avenue; could be revised to have two entrances to Safeway, one facing Howard and one facing
Primrose; this scheme preserves sunlight on Primrose, there wouldn't be a 30'-35'high wall; this appears to be the
better alternative of the two which have two buildings.
Commission discussion: From review of alternatives, see some guiding principles. They include:
. two separate buildings reduce the mass and bulk;
. break up the mass of parking into two separate parking areas with some public parking close to Primrose;
o loading areas closer to El Camino Real;
o separate truck and customer trafftc from pedestrians;
. proposal is pedestrian friendly;
o reinforce El Camino edge with landscaping;
. provide auto/truck access to El Camino Real;
o improve connection of site to Burlingame Avenue; and
o need direct access to both stores.
The Commission also suggested that the Citizens for a Better Burlingame alternative can be rearranged to meet
Safeway's needs regarding parking and circulation. the building could be shifted closer to El Camino Real withjust
enough room for truck access, could move more ofthe parking to the front ofthe store; there couldbe an additional
curb cut provided on Primrose closer to Walgreen's to provide better circulation and to alleviate congestion at Fox
Plazalane; this option also provides a connection between Safeway and Burlingame Avenue by having the public
parking close to Fox Plaza Mall and other Burlingame Avenue merchants; the Commission has pointed out ways
2
!
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Special Study.Sessroz Unapproved Minutes July 22, 2002
that this scheme can be further developed to address Safeway's concerns as well as meet the needs of the
community. CP Monroe pointed out that there will need to be a couple ofrevisions to meet City standards, the one
driveway closest to El Camino Real on Howard would have to be eliminated, and Calnans approval is needed for
any driveway on El Camino Real. It was also noted that there is no loading area shown for the Walgreen's store,
loading couldpossiblybe limitedto off-peakhours andsome oftheparking spaces couldbeblocked during loading.
Desien Concept
The group reviewed the various designs provided by the applicant and by staff. They found a preference for a
clean, simple design such as presented in the pictures of the Dublin and Kihei Safeway stores and the village
appearance of the Whole Foods store shown in the handout from staff.
Features mentioned as lending to a preferred design were:
o variation in roof heights with tower or dormer elements but overall keeping the roof below the
maximum 35 foot height to address the mass and bulk of the building, the height should be consistent
with the 15 foot ceiling height required inside and placement of the building relative to the street,
proportion is critical;
. details such as corbels, awnings and windows with a view to activity inside are important;. a landscape element is very important, integrating the site and building particularly along the edges and
in the parking area;
o a covered porch does well to define the space at the front store wall from the parking, decorative pavers
are also effective in defining the change from parking to store;. different materials are effective in breaking the structural mass as was done on the Dublin and Palo Alto
stores. In the case of the Palo Alto store the choice of rock material is nicely in scale with the size of the
area covered; and
. a nice, clean form consistent with the scale of the area.
The design chosen will be affected by the distance the structure is setback from the street, with the structure
further back, larger elements can be used; would like to see something architecturally interesting, unique to
Burlingame, not a skin like the pictures of Los Gatos; if the site plan has two stores then project should firy to
look more like the Whole Foods village; should avoid the urban, industial look of the San Jose store shown.
While commissioners noted it was difficult to give direction when the site p!*n was still unsettled, they
recognized the need for direction to get the project moving; also noted that one goal was to give the developer
flexibility to work within; should be clear what commissioners don't want by the examples given that were not
mentioned; feel that with a two building solution we are closer to resolution of the project; would like to see a
schematic of the design with suggested exterior, a draft set of plans with dimensions would be good for a design
review study session, need to confirm the truck circulation; project should be discussed at another study
meeting and then go to action. It was determined that the project should return to a study meeting separate from
the regular commission meeting and give the public the opportunity to discuss it as well. The Commission
thanked Safeway for the work they did refining the options discussed earlier and for putting together the design
concepts. It was beneficial for the Commission to have time to study the alternatives and give direction.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Keighran adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfu lly submitted,
Ralph Osterling, Secretary
3
S :\MINUTES\unapprovedT.22specialmtg.doc
IV
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING CO\{I\{ISSION UNAPPROYED MII{UTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
July 8,2002
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran,called the July 8, 2002, regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at7:02p.m.
Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, KeighLran, Keele, Osterling and
Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg (arrived at7:10 p.m.)
StaffPresent: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Zoning Technician, Erika
Lewit; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; City F,ngineer, Phil Monaghan
III. MINUTES CP Monroe noted that the minutes of the June 24, ?i02 regular meeting and
the July 2, 2OO2 special meeting of the Planning Commission wouid be
included in the next Commission packet for approval at the Jrily 22,2002
meeting.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that at the June 24, 2002 meeting the Planning
Commission requested that the project at 13 i0 Burlingame Alenue be placed
. at the beginning of the regular action items for this meeting. The project was, mistakenly placed on the agenda as Item #7. CP Monroe recommended that
Item#7,1310 Burlingame Avenue, be moved to the firstregular action item,
between Items # I and 2. The agenda was approved with the proposed
amendment.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
YI. STTJDY ITEMS
1. 36 ARTII\DEL ROAD - ZONED R-l - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTI.'RE (STORAGE) MCI{EL C. MINERVA, APPLICANT; JIM
ZT Lewitpresented a summary of the staffreport. C. Vistica noted that he lived within 500 feet of the
proposed project and stepped down from the dais. Commissioners asked: the applicant is asking for six
exceptions to the code and this is a large request. The proposed structure raises many red flags: it is almost
as large as the existing house; applicant should re-evaluate their needs on the property or provide a stonger
justification as to why such a large accessory sfructure is needed; the proposed structure is too large, plate
height is too high; it is massive and would have a large impact on the neighboring properties; landscaping
should be provided to help screen the structure. In addition, because of its size more thought should be put
into the materials and details proposed for the strucfure.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m. C. Vistica returned to the dais.
II. ROLL CALI,
City of Burlingame Planntng Commission Unqpproved Minutes
VII. ACTION ITEMS
July 8, 2002
Consent Calendar - hems on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acled on simuilaneously unless
separate discassion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner pior to the time the
commiss:ion votes on the motion to adopt.
There wete no items for Consent Calendar review.
V[I. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
1310 BURLINGAME AVENUE - ZOr{ED-C-1, SIIBAREAA-APPLICATIONFORCOMMERCLALDESIGN
REVIEW TO REMODEL AN EXSTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (MAHER FAKHOI'RI, APPLICANT;
KAHN DESIGN ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT; STEYEN G. GENSLER, PROPERTY OWNER) (53 NOTICED)
7
Reference staff report 7.08.02, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Seyen conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Charles Kahn and Tiffany Leichter,.Kahn Design Associates,
were present to answer questions. They submitted samples of the proposed tile and window frame.
Commission asked if the proposed window frames were aluminum or metal; what type of outdoor furniture
will be used; and how does the proposed awning compare to the existing awning. The applicant noted that
the window frame was a metal and aluminum composite and would be painted to look like wood. The patio
fumiture has not been chosen, but will be of quality material and will not be molded plastic outdoor
furniture; The proposed rehactable awning is a true awning, 6 feet deeper and also shorter than the existing
awning. ,The applicant also noted that the proposed Heath tiles are hand made in Sausalito.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Boju6s moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the conditions listed in the staffreport. The
motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: asked that the maker of the motion to consider a condition to insure that the patio
furniture is not molded plastic, which tends to look dingy.
Chair Keighran re-opened the public hearing. Maher Fakhouri, applicant, stated that he was corlmitted to
using quality materials for the project. The patio furyiture would probably be coated in plastic, but would be
heavyWeight and made to wear well for repeated outdoor use. There were no further comments and the
public hearing was closed.
Commission stated they hoped the fi{niture would be of quality material, buf .not sure how this could be
included as a condition- CA Anderson noted that the patio furniture is not subject to review as part of the
commercial design review application.
C. Boju6s revised his motion, removing the proposed new condition and moved for approval with the
following original seven conditions of approval:
l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
June 7, 211z,sheets A0.0 throu gh A2.O,and sheet A4.0, with powder coat painted aluminum frames on the
clearstory windows to match the aluminum sliding windows and doors at grade, and green patterned glazed
2
F,RIKA I,F,WIT
July 8, 2002
ceramic tile trim; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and
4r4endment to this perrnit; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first floor or
mezzanine level, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roofheight orpitch, shall be subject to commercial design review; 3)
that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's and Recycling Specialist's May 6, z}}z,memos shall be met;4)
that the project shall comply with the proposea Almoti-tion and construction recycling ordinance recently
approved by the City Council; 5) that three minimum 50W recessed light fxtures shall be installed in the
patio area and the fixtures shall be activated during all nighttime hours; 6) that all signage on the site shall
require a separate application for a sign permit; and,l)that the project shall meet all the requirements ofthe
California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
The second to the motion agreed.
Discussion: Commission thanked the applicant for designing a good project that used quality materials.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concludedat-7:29 p.m.
750 WALNUT AVENUE - ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (ASr
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; FITALI RUSLI, PROPERTY owNER) (75
NOTICED) PRO PI,ANNF,R : SF,AN O'ROI IR KE
Reference staffreport 7.08.02, with attachments. ZT Lewit presented a sunmary of the staffreport and
reviewed criteria and Planning Deparfinent comments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration.
Commission asked if staff knew the height of the existing house? Staffresponded that the applicant might
be able to provide that information.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Thomas Woo, designer, was present to answer questions. He
noted that the existing structure is approximately 25 feet in height. Commission commented that the style
for the proposed dwelling does not seem to match any ofthe houses in the neighborhood, nor does it match
the character ofBurlingame. The Commission asked the applicant to clariff the lines around the dwelling,
separating the first and second floors, shown on the plans; these details are not called out on the plans. Also,
why is the existing house being demolished. Thehpplicant responded that there is a line in the stucco
between the first and second floors and a sfucco veneer along the bottom of the first floor, as well as
between the first and second story windows on the front elevation. The existing house is poor condition, the
interior has been badly treated and not worth saving.
Mark Grandcolis, 754 Walnut Avenue, noted that there has been a lot ofprogress made on this project since
the initial submittal. He feels the West elevation is still bulky in appearance and also thinks that true divided
ligbt windows would improve the appearance of the proposed dwelling. There were no further comments
and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: have some big concerns about the style proposed for the dwelling; does not seem
to match any existing houses in Burlingame; there are opportunities missed in the design: divided light
windows could have been added throughout; there are two-story walls that could be broken-up by changing
the plate height on the second floor; more landscaping could be added along the West prop".ty iine to [elp
screen the new second story of the proposed dwelling; the North and South elevations need fine-tuning;
detail for the window installation and trim should be shown on the plans; and the vertical elements at the
front right side and rear right side are towerJike and should be reduced in appearance.
3
City of Burlingame Planntng Commission U4approved Minutes
2.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
This is a large lot and the floor area of the proposed house is large, but appropriate if landscaping provides
the proper setting and the details of the house are fine-tuned to downplay the massiveness of the dwelling.
C. Vistica moved to deny the application without prejudice, with the direction given to the applicant for
modifications to the project. The motion was seconded by Chair Keighran.
Discussion on the motion: this project has made many improvements since its initial submittal, but with
further alterations as directed by the Commission, the proposed dwelling will fit into the neighborhood and
be consistent with the character of Burlingame.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a 7-
0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:53 p.m.
1204 CABRILLO AVENUE - ZONED R-l 'APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REYIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR.DECLINING HEIGHT E}.IVELOPE FOR A NEW, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND
DETACHED GARAGE (TOM BAZZONE, APPLICANT; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC.,
DESIGNER; MIKE WILSON, PROPERTY OWNER} (61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATIIERINE
3.
KEYLON
Reference staff report 7.O8.Oz,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments, noting the design reviewers cornments and recommendations. Ten conditions were
suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked ifthe limitation on the void spaces ever being converted
to living space would run with the land. Staffnoted that it would. There were no other questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. James Chu, architect, represented the project. He noted that this
project is particularly difficult because the house is already built; cunent proposat -mak9s lajor
modifications from the previous design; removed the dormers on the right side and reduced the declining
height exception by recessing the second floor wall back into the building, which also reduced the FAR; the
Uuiiaing height now complies wittr the code at 30 feet;they will comply with all the conditions.
Commissioners asked if the buyers had entered into a contract and who would be responsible forpaying for
these modifications to the structure; architect said there was a sale contract on the house he did not know
who was responsible for the cost of the modifications. Why is there lattice work in two places on the left
elevation, would vines be grown on both the lattices, the landscape plan shows 24 inchbox fiees in front of
one lattice. Architect noted that in the original design there was a window removed in the kitchen, and the
lattice replaced the window to break up the wall, there would be vines planted onthat lattice. Commissioner
noted that the landscape plan showed substantial vegetation in front of the lattice toward the rear on the left
elevation, so it could be removed. Architect noted that jasmine would be planted on both trellises.
Commissioner noted that he had a problem with voided areas, why could the void in bedroom 3 not be
removed; the void in the master bath could easily be removed in the future with remodel and turned into a
shower; existence of these voided areas creates a precedent which is not acceptable because they contribute
to the mass and bulk of the building. Architect noted amount of voided area has been reduced to 895 SF, at
last meeting commission recommended that these areas be filled with a blown insulation material and the
walls be -"dr of plywood, so they would be difficult to remove; since this project the commission has a
new policy which counts all area over 5 feet in heigbt in the FAR and directs staffto allow no voided areas,
don,i thini this will happen again. Commission asked ifhabitable space on the second floor went away with
the dormers. Staff noted that the volume in the rooms may be less but not the floor area because all area
with a 5 foot or greater ceiling height will be counted in FAR-
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
Steve Pade, 1205 Cabrillo Avenue, would like to see this project get moving, have lived across the street for
7 months with consfuction debris and fencing; have problem with the way the height ofthe house has been
reduced by clipping the roof, it will not be consistent with the otherhom.r in ttre neigbUorhood; do not feel
that the declining height issue was resolved properly, both loose, owner gets thick walls and the neighbor
does not get light; feel that the design has lost architectural style, would like the leaded glass window back
at the front and the slate roof, withorrt these features there is nothing about the house which is unique, the
block is composed of 70 to 80 year old houses each of which has some unique feature, this one needs an
architectural feature to mark it, otherwise it looks like the monster houses built on Broadway at Cabrillo.
There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner discussion: concerns raised were discussed in the design reviewer's report included in the
staff report, reduced declining height envelope encroachment, left a small amounl which will have no real
effect on the neighbor; appreciate changes, the report addresses all the items raised by commission; difficult
with voided areas, they do increase mass and bulk, the amount of void area has been reduced and addressed
by the design reviewer. Still opposed to voided areas, could remove walls and reduce this square footage,
especially in the master bathroom, should stay within the FAR. Design reviewer did a wonderful job, really
studied, think changes are a big improvement, reduce apparent height and mass, reco$ized that if cut off
roof need to be attentive to finish detail at top and how it is done, if it is done poorly at cut it is a problem, if
done well it will look like a ridge; have been working on this project for some time, better now, in favor of it
as presented. Long review has benefited community, changes proposed by designer are best, it reduced
declining height, 12 inches remaining will not make a big difference to neighbor, taking offthe dormer did a
lot to decrease the volume; project is within the FAR; voided areas are a concern, spoke to a confractor, this
insulation material will be difficult to break through, project as resulted in increased awareness of this
problem in the future.
Chair Keighran moved to approve the project as revised, by resolution with the following conditions: l) that
the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 2l ,
2002, sheets A.l through A.6, L-l,site plan, floorplans and building elevations; 2)thatthe applicant shall
pay a deposit, in the amount to be determined by the City Planner, to the City of Burlingame to hire an
experienced construction consultant to supervise all corrective and other constuction, and report weekly in
writing to the Building and Planning Deparhnents on the compliance of the constructionat-l2}4Cabrillo
Avenue; this deposit amount shall be based on an estimate from the construction consultant for his/trer
hourly fee and the estimated numter of hours required for inspection of this project through the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy; 3) that there shall be no more than 89 SF of cavities within the second floor as
shown on the schematic plans date stamped June 21, 2\O2,and the applicant shall completely fill-in the
cavities noted to be closed offand not counted in the FAR calculation
-on
the proposed ,.rooi floor plan
(sheet A.3.1) with Icynene ins-ulation; the applicant shall contact the Building Department and arrange for
an inspection once the Icynene insulation has been sprayed into these spaces and before they have-been
permanently sealed off; and that these spaces, totaling approximately 89 SF shall never be converted to
living area; 4) that bushes/shrubs shall be planted along the left elevation to fill in the space where the
kitchen window was removed; 5) that any changes to the size or envelope of the project, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), or changing the roof height or pitch, and changes to windoddoor
placement or size, shall be subject to design review; 6) that the conditions of the City Engineer's and Chief
Building Official's April29,2002 memos shall be met; 7) that prior to scheduling the roof framing
inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shool and establish the height of the roof ridge and provide to the
Building Department certification of that height; 8) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the
project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification to the
Building andPlanningDepartments thatthe architectural details such as window locations andbays arebuilt
5
City ol Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
as shown on the approved plans; 9) that prior to final inspection, Plaming Department staffshall inspect and
note compliance ofthe architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to veriry that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; l0) that the project shall meet all the
requirements of the Califomia Buildipg and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame; I l) that slate shall be required on the roofor an equivalent material approved by the Planning
Commission before removal of the red tag and issuance ofa building permit for the currently approved
modifications to the structure; and 12) that the builder shall install leaded glass windows as shown on the
original plans for the project, to be shown on the plans and approved as being equivalent by the Planning
Department prior to removal of the red tag and issuance ofa building permit for the currently approved
modifications to the skucture. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Commission comment on the motion: Glad to see the condition which requires a construction consultant
to oversee construction on this project based on the plans presented; troubled by the project, originally
felt should remove the second floor and begin again, but feel that the wrong people would pay the price
for the correction, real problem is that the house was originally designed to the maximum; feel that
should convert the roofto the original slate, its too late to add other architectural distinction, would like
to add a condition regarding the slate roof. Would like to add slate also if the roof structure will carry
the weight. CA noted could add a condition requiring applicant install slate or an equivalent approved
by the Planning Commission, could bring back on Planners Reports ifnot able to install slate. The
maker of the motion and the second agreed to adding a condition requiring the use ofslate on the roofor
an'equivalent approved by the Planning Commission.
Continued Comniission discussion: concerned that the windows in the bay at the front of the house be
leaded glass as shown on the original, an important way to add character to this structure and make it
stand out as special in this neighborhood. The maker and second agreed to the addition ofa condition
requiring the builder to install leaded glass windows as shown on the original plans for the project.
Noted the importance that this building now be built exactly as shown on these approved plans with
changes added by the Planning Commission, can a fine be imposed to insure compliance this time? CA
responded builder has suffered loss of time and will pay to be supervised by another contractor who will
submit regular reports that he is in compliance or the job will be stopped until he is in compliance.
Chair Keigh,ran called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve the plans as revised for this project with
the staff conditions and two conditions added by the Commission. The motion passed on a 6-l(C. Boju6s
dissenting). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:25 p.m.
4.1217 BERNAL AITENUE - Z)NED - R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECTAL PERMIT
FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND
DETACHED GARAGE (JD & ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; STELLA P. HI,JNG, PROPERTY
OWNER) (59 NOTI CED) PROJECT PLANNER:KEYLON
Reference staffreport, 7.08.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Deparhnent comments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioner asked
staff why the proposed chimney terminated so close to the roof of the dwelling? Staf responded that
Building code requirements regulated the height of chimneys based on vertical and horizontal separations
from adjacent structures.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Jerry Deal, desigrrer and applicant, \ as present to answer
questions. He noted that the chimney is purely decorative because the fireplace is not a wood-buming
dreplace, therefore separation standards do not need to be met. There were no further comments and the
public hearing was closed.
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
C. Bojuds moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions. The
motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Discussion on the motion: have reviewed the landscape plan and found it to be totally inadequate. There is
no large-scale vegetation proposed on site to screen the second story for the proposed dwelling; cannot
approve the project with the submitted landscape plan.
Chair Keighran re-opened the public hearing. Jerry Deal, designer and applicant, stated that he would get a
revised plan from the landscape architect, as well as consult with the City Arborist about appropriate
landscaping. Would not like to see the project delayed. Can the Commission take action on the project and
reviewthe landscapeplanseparately? Therewereno furthercomments andthepublichearingwas closed.
Continued Commission discussion: CA Anderson noted that the Commission could approve the project at
the hearing tonight with a condition regarding the landscaping on site and request that a landscape plan be
brought back for their review as a Planner's Report at a fufure hearing: Commissioner recornmended an
added c.ondition to require a new landscape plan showing more vertical, large-scale elements at the front and
rear of ihe proposed structure and along the driveway areas of the property to softeh the second story
addition from the view of the neighbors and the steet,'and to require that an amended landscape plan be
brought back to the Commission for review comment and reviewif necessary: l) that the projeit it utt bt
built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent date stamped June 28,2}O2,Sheets l-6,
and G- l, site plan, floor plans, building elevations and landscape plan; 2) thatany increase to the habitable
basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would
include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a
dormer (s) or changing the roofheight or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that the conditions of
the Recycling Specialist, City Engineer, and Chief Building Official's memos dated May 28,2002 shall be
met; 4) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners, set the building envelope; 5) that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certiff the
first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
6) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed ,o*.yor shall shoot the heighiof the roof
ridge and provide certification ofthat height; 7) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project
architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the
architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; ifthere is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
certification underpenalty ofperjury; 8) that prior to final inspection, Planning Deparfrnent staffwill inspect
and note compliance ofthe architectural details (trim materials, window tlpe, etc.) to veriff that the project
has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 9) that large-scale vertical vegetation
shall be added to the front and rear of the propeily, as well as along the driveway side of the property to
screen the second story addition; and that prior to a final inspection by the Building Department, a revised
landscapeplan shall be reviewed andapprovedbythe PlanningCommission and theproposed landscaping
shall be installed on site; and l0) that the project shall meet all the requirements ofthe California Building
andFire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with amended conditions. The motion
passed on a 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:38 p.m.
7
5.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
II37-II45 PALOMA AVENUE _ ZONED R.3 - APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, VARIANCE FOR DWELLTNG UNITS IN THREE BUIL.DINGS ON ONE LOT, AND
CoNDoMTNIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW THREE (3) STORY, TWELVE (12) UNIT RESIDENTTAL
CONDOMIMT.JM (DALE MEYE& DALE MEYERASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; FU-LEN
CHENG. PROPERTY OWNER) (78 NOTICED)PI,ANNER : RI]BEN HTIRIN
a. Variance and Condominium Permit
b. Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Merger and Tentative Condominium Map
Reference staffreport 7.Ol.Oz,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Forty-seven conditions were suggested for consideration. ChairKeighran
acknowledged a letter submitted from Mark Benson, 1133 Paloma Avenue. Commissioners asked staff:
applicant indicates that they have increased affordability by making two more units one bedroom instead of
two bedrooms, is this what city intended. Staffnoted no, affordable units are those which are priced in rent
for sale to be affordable to low and moderate income individuals or families and which are kept at that level
in the market, usually by a third party. Project does not seem to address construction staging or parking for
construction employees, does city review this at sonrc point? Senior Engineer noted that it is hard to police
where construction employees park in an area like this, tend to use metered spaces like everyone else; CP
noted that employees could be required to park in the Chula Vista lot and walk since the distance is short.
CA noted that Commission could add a eondition requiring the construction plan to be approved by the
Planning Commission before issuance of a building permit, use of the Chula Vista lot by construction
employees would be enforced on complaint. Presently there is a loading zone closer to Broadway, could it
be extended across the front of this lot during construction; SE yes that would help, but would remove some
on street parking. What is the code requirement for common open space in a condominium; CP as
established by Commission and Council resolution, 100 SF per dwelling unit, 507o of which must be in soft
landscaping, the area must be useable.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing, Dale Meyer, 857 Burlway Road, architect represented the
project. He reviewed the changes made since the last review; note that since a contractor has not been
selected it is difficult at this time to do a construction parking plan, depends where the contractor's yard is
located, each will stage differently; would be willing to submit later, closer to the time of construction,
when they have a contractor.
Commissioners asked: neighbor raises question of Redwoods; noted during on site inspection that these
were small, vigorous trees located on the neighbors property, would not be a problem during construction,
landscape plan shows added plant materials adjacent which will benefit Redwoods and not complete. Glad
to see front setback met and the towers lowered to meet height limits, had asked to raise to natural grade but
did not change, why? Architect noted that spoke with Chief Building Official and ifraised building to grade
it would be classified as three story and a second exit extending along the third floor with stairs to the
ground would be required, this balcony exit could not be added without cantilevering over the driveway
access or encroaching into the side yard setback, Commissioner noted ifbuilt at grade would match better
what is existing on the block; thought about raising height of middle building to reduce footprint; Architect
noted that felt he was directed to eliminate height exception. Outdoor common area does not seem to be
adequate, as designed has poor usability, hard to get too by residents since area is blocked by two sets of
parking spaces; seems to be calculated to the closest inch, too much building on the site. Architect noted
ihat the area is 20'by 44', lawn surrounded with shrubs, on south side of site with the best light, easy to get
to via garage doors, the parking spaces xe 24' away on both sides because of the location of the back up
areas.
-Commissioners
asked about making units affordable, had considered making some units rentals.
Architect noted that they were building housing for sale.
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
From the Floor: Rudolph Horak, l3l Los Robles Drive; Mike Jilley, lll7 Paloma Avenue, noted that
when moving from a single family house into a condominium need to look for units large enough to have a
broom closet, have looked at other condominiums and they are not big enough to include a broom closet;
these units are big enough, square footage may look large but the calculation includes balconies, decks and
garage, when take that out they are reasonably sized with enough living space. Live across the street also
own the property, this is a good idea, will be an asset to the neighborhood, increase the opportunity for
people to buy in an area with good mass transit access; people who own condominiums generally take better
care of the neighborhood than renters. There were no firther cornments from the floor and the public
hearing was closed.
Commission commehts: concemed with the sizeifthe project, there is a lot ofbuilding on the site, common
open space does not meet standard, its too finely calculated and poorly located to be useable; building is
nice, feel that the recesses on the wall are too shallow (l inch or less) so.will look like a stucco box because
the articulation is too minor; would be OK to reduce front setback ifable to incorporate deeper articulation
on the front fagade of the buildings and facilitates better common open space; front setback exception
would be OK if it matched the setbacks on-the rest of the block; noted that the block average v/as 16'+
because of the setbacks of the three houses being replaced by the project. Right track with design,
concemed with open space, could reduce structure size and increase open space; perfect location for
affordable housing, future projects will be required to provide. CA noted that while the General Plan has
been amended to encourage affordable housing, the ordinance requiring its inclusion has not yet been
adopted. Important to include affordable unit when legislation requires it, was not a requirement when this
project was submitted, this is a good location close to mass transit for affordable housing. Need to find a
way to merge the split open spaces provided at the rear to achieve a more useable common open space,
location good.
C. Boju6s noted that the direction seemed to be clear and moved to continue the item for revisions based on
discussion, then the commission will act on the project, noting that requiring affordable housing for this
project which has been in the review process so long seems to be up to the applicant. The motion was
seconded by C. Osterling.
suggest that four uncovered parking spaces be put togetber so share 24' back up area and open space
extended along rear oflot to incorporate second 24 foot back up area and small piece oflandscaping
at rear comer, so able to retain parking, unit size and increase useable common open space by
increasing its size.
Wolld like applicant to look at front setback and increasing depth ofarticulation on the front ofthe
building.
Should add extra tree at the front to balance the screening of the existing street trees.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item to a time when the plans have
been revised to reflect the issues discussed. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. CA noted that because
this item was not continued to a date certain it would be renoticed. The action is not appealable. The item
concluded at 9:45 p.m.
Comment on the motion: don't feel that the open space provided will be used, it is too small, would not
want to trade offparking for open space in this area where on street parking is such a problem; proximity to
hansit corridor is unique in this project, encourage fewer cars, like more open space. The commissioners
noted the following:
9
6.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
1399 BROADWAYAND 1160 CAPUCHINO AvItttrE-ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA
- APPLICATION FOR LOT LINE ADruSTMENT (DAVID HINCKLE, APPLICANI AND PROPERTY OWNER;
BRYAN G. TAYLOR rNC.. LANp SURVEYORS) (68 NOTICEp) PROJECT ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG
Reference staffreport 7.08.02, with attachments. Senior Engineer Phil Monaghan, presented the staff
report.
CP Monroe noted that in the future, if'commission agreed, lot mergers could be placed on the consent
calendar. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Ann Hinkel, I 61 6 Sanchez, property and business owner, of the
site, noted she would answer questions and asked for approval. CP Monroe noted that this merger would
join the parking area and site with the building on it into one parcel which \Mas a benefit. There were no
questions by commission and no further comments from the floor.
C. Auran moved approval ofthe lot merger map with tvro conditions: (l) that the lot-line adjusfrnent shall be
recorded and a oopy of the record shall be sent to the City; and (2) that the future development ofthe new lot
shall be subject to design review by the Planning Commission including the effects of site development,
proposed paving, irrigation and storm drainage. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the lot line adjustment. The motion passed
onaT- 0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. The item concluded at9l.47 p.m.
8.1155 CALTFORNIA DRTVE, #B - ZONED C-2 - APPLTCATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TAKE-OUT SERVICE (CARL AND GRACE BREDL, APPLICANTS;
HARRY MORROW, DESIGNER; MANSA EXCHANGE TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER) (47 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER:HTIRIN
Reference staff report 7.08.02, with attachmerfis. ZT Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Planning Department comments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked
staffif sidewalks in this areaarepower-washed by the City; could this be added as a condition of approval
for the project? CP Monroe and CA Anderson noted that this sidewalk is not routinely power washed by the
City. Powerwashing is an expensive service and in any case, if the business becomes apublic nuisance for
any reason, the conditional use permit will come back to the Commission for review.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Mark and Grace Bredl, applicants, were present to answer
questions. They noted that they clean the sidewalk themselves twice a month. Commission asked why the
amended conditions did not include the option ofpreparing and selling salads on site. The applicants stated
that they had not thought of adding salads to their menu; they already prepare vegetables on site for the
smoothies and salads would not be that different; salads are a good idea and would agree to amend the
conditions of approval to include the preparation of salads. There were no further comments and the public
hearing was closed.
C. Keighran noted that she would like to see the business succeed and moved to approve the application to
expand the product sold, by resolution, with the amended conditions:
l) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparhnent and date
siamped June i l, 2002 (floor plan) and site plan (8Y2" x I 1") and shall not have tables and chairs for
customer seating; Z)thatthe store may notbe open forbusiness except during the hours of6:00 a.m. to 9:00
l0
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
p.m., Monday through Friday, and the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. SaturdayE and Sundays; 3) that all
deliveries to the site shall be scheduled twice a week between 5:30 to 6:00 a.m.; 4) that no alcoholic
beverages shall be sold from the juice bar and the take-out food service business shall be limited to sale of
coffee, juices, smoothies, sandwiches, salads, soups and prepackaged foods; 5) that all employees shall park
off-site; 6) that the applicant shall purchase and maintain at Ieast daily, more often if necessary, a trash
receptacle inside the door to the store and on the sidewalk along California Drive at a location approved by
the City Engineer and Fire Department, the trash receptacle on the sidewalk shall be of the design approved
for the streetscape improvements; 7) that this application shall be reviewed for compliance with its
conditions in one year (July 2003) or upon complaint; 8) that the applicant shall remove once a day ormore
frequently, if determined to be necessary by the City, all take-out debris on the sidewalk, in the gutter, and
within 501 of the store in each direction; and 9) that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all
California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City ofBurlingame. The motion was
seconded by C. Boju6s.
10.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with amended conditions. The motion
passed on a 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:57 p.m.
1616 ROLLINS ROAD-ZONED M.l_APPLICATION FORMITIGATED NEGATWE DECLARATIONAND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR PARKING IN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PETER
O'HARA, PACIFIC PROPERTY ASSET MGMT., APPLICANT; NEAL MARTIN, PLANNER/CONSULTANT;
SANJAYLYN COMPANY. PROPERTY OWNER) (46 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATTIERINE KEYLON
Reference staffreport 7.Ol.O2,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Twenty-four conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: ifthis is
not long term airport parking how is its operation different? Staff noted users do not drive to the site
themselves and take a shuttle to the airport and come back to the parking site when they pickup their cars.
Cars are driven from the hotel site to the storage lot by valets, then returned to the hotel site to be there when
the travelers return to the hotel from their trip. Who are the drivers? Hotel employees. VIhen will the Army
Corps of Engineer decide whether a permit is required. Staff noted that after the City acts on this
application the Corps will review and decide what they will require. There were no further questions of
staff.
ChaifKeignranopenedthepublichearing. BobLanzone,g3glaurelStree!sanCados,attomcy,andPeter
O'Hara, representative of the property owner, represented the project. This project has been in process for
I Y;years, done a full report of the site, Corps will need to evaluate use as it relates to an isolated wetland
and whether protection proposed is sufficient; accept the conditions, this is a low intensity use, 16 cars a day
in and out during offpeak hours; will take care of damaged drainage pipe, mitigations will require full
compliance with NPDES, will preserve the limited habitat area, will provide the 9 parking spaces for
neighbor, although he needs to apply for a variance in order to use them; this shifting of parking to the
easement area will allow the trucks to load and unload across his properly as they are now; thire is a
remaining issue between the property owners of a prescriptive easement, but this is a private matter and
would nol affect this use since adequate access. for the parking in the drainage area is provided on site.
Commissioner noted that this area will play a part in the overall planning for the Rollins Road area, and
committing it to some use now may be premature since that planning study is at its inception. Applicant
noted that he had been contacted by economist and discussed the impact of the new BART station on the
potential uses of his properly; his view was that the drain was suitable for limited uses and parking was
probably best for it. How does one know that the K-rails will be effective in protecting the frogs. The
professional biologist who has had experience suggested them; frogs outside the fiabitat aria tend to follo*
ll
City of B urlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minules July 8, 2002
the edge of the rails until they find an opening. There were no further comments from the floor and the
public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that with the mitigations it
would reduce any potentially significant effects ofthe project to levels acceptable to the community and to
amend the conditional use permit because the effects of the use would be minimal, by resolution with the
following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department date stamped January 17, 2002, site plan, parking plan, and grading and drainage plan, sheets I
through 5; with the parking for the ambulance serve and their employees shifted to the south end ofthe site
and 185 parking spaces for auto storage at the north end of the site, a fence shall separate the two parking
areas and only the area to the north shall be used for auto storage without amendment to tiis use permit; 2)
that the site shall be used for long term hoteVmotel parking only for up to 185 vehicles to be brought to and
from the site from hoteVmotel employees and/or valets; the site shall not be used for airport selfparking;
personal vehicle owners are not permitted to bring their vehicle to the site to and from the site; 3) that the
long term hoteVmotel parking use on the subject property shall be subject to the regulations ofresolution 87-
2001 approved by the Burlingame City Council on Iuly 23, 2001 requiring a business license tax on
operators of commercial parking facilities in the City of Burlingame; 4) that the conditions of the City
Engineer's March 12, 2001 memo shall be met; 5) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
Califomia Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City ofBurlingame; 6)
the project shall obtain necessary permits to meet the standards of the required permitting agencies
including: California Deparhnent of Fish and Game, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control
Board, State Water Resources Control Board, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 7) the grading plan shall be prepared by a licensed Engineer and approved by the City Engineer
before a grading permit is issued. Al1 applicable requirements ofNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) shall be adhered to in the design and during construction, including the following listed
below; 8) the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system and the
drainage ditch at the rear of the property; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines,
existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil; 9) the
applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing Best Management Practices
(BMPs) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system and the drainage
ditch at the rear of the property; the plan shall include a site plan showing tle property lines., exisJing and
proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations ofcuVfill and soil storage/disposal areas;
areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage pattems and structures;
watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream of the project; and designated
construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; l0) off-site runoffshall be diverted around the
construction site and all on-site runoffshall be diverted around exposed construction areas; I l) methods and
procedures such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, straw bale dikes, check
dams storm drain inlet protection soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded
areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until
permanent erosion controls have been established; 12) all runoff created during construction and future
discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systan (NPDES)
standards; 13) each storm water inlet on the site shall be equipped with a sand/oil separato4 all sand/oil
separators shall be inspected and serviced on a regular basis, and immediately following periods ofheary
,uirfull, to ascertain the conditions of the chambers; maintenance records shall be kept on-site; 14) that
drainage from paved surfaces, including parking lots, driveways and roofs shall be routed to storm water
inlets equipped with sand/oil-separators and/or fossil filters, then the water shall be discharged into the
storm drain iystem; the property owners shall be responsible for inspecting and cleaning sand/oil separators
t2
July 8, 2002
and changing fossil filters on a regular basis as well as immediately prior to, and once during, the rainy
season (October 15 - April l); 15) as part of this proposal, the applicant shall replace the broken 2l inch
stormwater drain that is located in the rear easement (behind 1600 Rollins Road, in front of the three PG&E
towers), that is part ofthe subject property, with a new 2l inch re-enforced concrete pipe that will daylight
at the rear drainage channel below the top of the bank in the drainage channel at a point in the channel
approved by the City Engineer; 16) the site shall be sprayed with water to control dust during grading and
construction. Construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with the standards ofthe Bay Area
Air Quality Management Distric! 17) all vehicles to be stored on-site for long term hoteUmotel parking
shall not be moved during the peak traflic hours, and shall only be moved during off-peak traffic hours from
9:30a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. on the weekdays, with no time restrictions on moving
vehicles on Saturday and Sunday; l8) a K-rail barrier shall be installed along the top ofthe drainage ditch.
This barrier shall include 13 one-way ramps to allow the movement of frogs back into the drainage ditch,
should they be trapped in the parking area; 19) all construction shall be required to be done in accordance
with the Uniform Building Code requirements as amended by the Cify ofBurlingame, and limits to hours of
construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code; 20) the property owner shall provide
accesseasement rights to the City of Burlingame for maintenance with the drainage easement. The City of
Burlingame shall be held harmless for any property damage which might occur as a result oiflooding within
the drainage easement adjacent spur hack right-of-way. The property owner shall repair, to City standards,
the 2l inch drain line and extend it to the drainage channel; 2l) the property owners shall prepare an access
plan for the maintenance and repair for all the power towers on the site which shall be approved by the City
Engineer and proper representation ofPG&E before a grading permit shall be issued; 22) the improvements
over the drainage channel shall not compromise the surface drainage flow to the drainage ditch at the rear of
1616 Rollins Road and shall not compromise the holding capacity of the basin dwing flooding. No fencing
shall obstruct existing surface drainage into and through t}re easement from the adjacent parcels. All the
vehicles shall be relocated during flood situations; 23) fencing shall be required around the site except where
it might obstruct drainage during flooding in the drainage easement; and 24) ifany prehistoric oihistoric
archeological relics are discovered during grading and construction, all work will be halted until the finding
can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be
implemented. The motion was seconded by C. Keele.
Comments on t}le motion: concerned about approving this project in the drain at this time with the SAp
workotits inception, don't know how this open area will conhibute to the open space pla- for the industrial
area, could recommend pedestrian access or something else in the drain in the fufure, if this would block
such use would vote no on this project; CP noted that the biologist is reviewing all the drain and creek areas
in the Rollins Road area at this time, he is identifring potential and also where sensitive habitats may be, do
not have results; commissioner noted there are other drains and creeks in the Rollins Road area more
removed from US 1 0 I with better open space potential and which provide better pedestrian access within the
area than this one; applicant could stack parking which would leave some open space for other uses.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
amendment to the conditional use permit to add hoteVmotel parking storage in the drainage area. The
motion was approved on a voice vote 6-l (C. Vistica dissenting). Appeal piocedures were advised. This
item concluded at l0:15 p.m.
l3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes
City of Burlingame P lanning Commission Unapproved Minutes
Ix. DESIGNREVIEWSTUDYITEMS
11.
Jrly 8, 2002
543 CORBITTDRTVE-ZONED R-I -APPLICATIONFORDESIGNREVIEWFORAFIRSTAND SECOND
STORYADDITION(ALFREDOREYES, STEWARTASSOCIATES,APPLICANTANDARCHITECT;DANIEL
AND LAURA BERTERRETCHE PROPERry OWNERS) (56 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: SEAN
O'ROURKE
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, and Daniel Berterretche, p-rope.ry
owner, were present to answer questions. They noted that the original character ofthe house was Spanish
and the proposed additions are an attempt to match and enhance this character. Commissioner asked ifthe
brick veneer at the front of the existing dwelling would remain? Applicant replied that this detail is
consistent with some original Spanish-style structures and they wished to keep it. There were no other
comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission had the following concems about the prop.,ed project and asked the applicant to address these
items on the revised plans:
applicant should prepare an more detailed landscape plan and arborist's report to propose hees at
the front and rear of the property to screen the second story addition and to address tree protection
measures for the existing vegetation;
can applicant provide an outline ofthe footprint for the adjacent neighboring houses (sides and rear)
so Commission can see their relationship with the proposed addition;
the left elevation is a large empty wall and should have some detail to add articulation; and
will a tile roofbe used? applicant should speci$ roofmaterial, as well as whether the existing brick
veneer at the front elevation will remain on the plans submitted for action.
C. Vistica made a motion place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the revisions have been
made and plan checked. The motion was seconded by Chair Keighran.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a votcc vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:30 p.m.
1033 BALBOAAVENT]E-ZONED R-l-APPLICATIONFORDESIGNREVIEWFORANEWTWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE. (CHARLES SCHEMBRI, APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER; STEWART ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (62 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
ZT Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. John Stewart, architect, and Charles Schembri, property
owner, were present to answer questions. The architect noted that he was excited about the Craftsman
character of tle project because that style is his passion and he feels it is appropriate for the site and the
neighborhood. 'ihe property owner noted that during the subdivision of the subject property and lot 58,
theie was a lot of concern about the large trees on lot 5B. There are no substantial trees on Lot 5A.
currently there are currently no plans to develop lot 5B next door to the subject property. commissioner
noted that the landscape plan includes a .plant # 14" that is missing from the plant list.
t4
t2.
Cig ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minules July 8, 2002
Commission had the following concerns about the proposed project and asked the applicant to address these
items on the revised plans:
applicanf should prepare an arborist report to address the protection, pruning, and maintenance of
the trees on lot 58 during the construction on lot 5A; and
conditions of approval for the project should stress the proper MDES measures to be taken during
construction on lot 5A to prevent run-off and debris from going into tle creek.
Marianella Iraida, 1037 Balboa Avenue, and Andrew Styoa, 1024 Cortez Avenue, spoke to express their
concems about the trees located on lot 58. They are a spectacular resource and should not be damaged or
compromised during development. The neighbors also noted that tiey felt the desigr was nice but the
proposed dwelling was very massive compared to the other homes in the neighborhood. There were no
other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the arborist report has
been submitted and reviewed. The motion was secorrded by C. Auran.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when the requested
inforrnation had been submitted and reviewed. The motion p.rssed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at l0:45 p.m.
13.1462 VANCOWER AVENUE - ZONED R-I - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT EI{VELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (KEVIN
AND LAUREN O,SULLIVAN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; MICHAEL PALZA, HUNT, IIALE
AND JONES.HITECN (65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKALEWIT
ZT Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keigkan opened the public comment. Michael Palza, Hunt Hale Jones Architects, and Kevin and
Lauren O'Sullivan, property owners, were present to answer questions. They noted that their intent with the
addition was to give character to the existing boxed- shaped house. The design ofthe proposed dwelling
proposes to do this by repeating some of the existirrg nalf-timber articulation at the front elevation on the
other sides and by adding a gabled roof similar to those seen throughout the neighborhood. Commissioner
noted that the majority ofthe additional floor area being added to the property was in the proposed single-
car garage. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission had the following concems about the proposed project and asked the applicant to ad&ess these
items on tle revised plans:
the half+imbering, especially at the left elevation, Iooks a liftle forced and awkward; designer should
look at reducing this detail on second level and perhaps adding some to the first level; shorrld
achieve a simpler effect, similar to the existing half timber and articulation on the front elevation;
there are some details missing from the plans, such at the window detail, will the proposed new
windows in the addition have a stucco stopper trim; note on plans if existing windows, particularly
the leaded glass windows, remain with the new construction; provide a window and window trim
detail;
15
City of Brrlingame Phnning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
the trees at the fiont of the property are a great asset and should be protected during construction;
applicant should provide an arborist report which includes hee protection measures with the
landscape plan; and
note on the landscape plan what will be planted on the hellises shown.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the suggested
revisions have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded by Chair Keigbran.
Chair Keigbran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at I l:00 p.m.
X. PLANNERREPORTS
Review of Safeway Study Session & Conclusion
Staffnoted that Planning Comrnission continued the Special Study Meeting on the Safeway project,
1450 Howard Avenue to 6:00 p.m. before the next Planning Commission meeting on July 22,2002.
The meeting will be in Conference Room A in City Hall. Staffasked if the Commission would like
to setback the regular Commission meeting to a 7:30 p.m. start in order to allow them enough time
for discussion. Chair Keighran made a motion to move back the start time of the Regular Planning
Commission meeting on July 22,2002,to 7:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by C. Bojuds. The
motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. Staff noted that the materials for the study meeting would be
included in the regular packet which would be delivered the Wednesday before the meeting.
Review of STOPPP (NPDES) model development policies
CP Monroe noted that under the current permit with the San Francisco Regional Water Quality
Conhol Board the City was required to adopt administrative planning policies regarding water
quality. The enclosed memo notes thosepolicies. We will be required to amend our General Plan
goals and policies to reflect these deparhnent policies within the next year. Staff will review the
current General Plan policy document and determine what new policies will need to be added. The
commission can consider these within the next year at the same time we are considering other
amendments to the General Plan.
Review of sigr at 1070 Broadway
CA Anderson reviewed his memo regarding the iszue ofmaintaining the face ofthe nonconforming'
illuminated sign on tle property at 1070 Broadway. The issue revolves around the fact that the
technblogy of the current sign is obsolete and changing the face (which is allowed for
nonconforming signs under the current code) means installing new technology. The city did an
illumination study and established that the typical illumination ofsignage was 20 to 50 canellas at 30
feet and, since it is a replacement, the new sign face will be held to that range. Commissioners noted
that the new technology will mean that there will be a qualitative difference in this sign from what
was there. CA Anderson acknowledged that this is so, and that was the reason that the Commission
was FYIed on this change. Unfortunately the conditions of approval made at the time the sign
exception was granted, years ago, did not place limitations on the timing of the change of the face
16
Review of City Council Regular Meeting of July l, 2002
CP Monroe reviewed the planning related actions taken at the July 1,2002, City Council meeting.
She noted that the Council has cancelled its second meeting in August.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 8, 2002
of the sign. However, he noted that the sign could only provide advertising for the type of car sold
from that site, off site advertising is not allowed presently or under the terms ofthe sign code when
this sign was originally approved.
FYI - Canvas carport addition at 530 El Camino Real
Commission acknowledged the addition of a canvas stucture over an exterior parking space for the
convenience of a unit owner since it did not encroach within the20 foot setback established in the
previous planning approval forthe site and did not cause the site to exceed lot coverage maximums.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Keighran adjourned the meeting at I l:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ralph Osterling, Secretary
LJNAPPROvEDI,an nnBsT. 08. 02
,it
T7
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
July 22,2002
7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran called the July 22,2002, regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:35 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele,
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Vistica left at 8:15 p.m.
StaffPresent City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner Keylon; City
Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Phil Monaghan.
ilL MINUTES The minutes of the luly 2,2002,Planning commission Special study session
and the regular meeting of June 24,2002, were approved as mailed. The
minutes of the regular meeting of July 8, 2002, were amended on page 9,
third paragraph to read "affordable housing for this project which has been in
the review process selong seems to be up to the applicant". The minutes
were approved as amended.
IV. APPROVAL Of'AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Doreen Campanelli,1620 Howard Avenue, noted that she was a 32year
resident who lives walking distance to the Burlingame Safeway store but
must drive to 17ft Avenue in San Mateo because ihat sto.e has everything;
Commission should push to get the Safeway store approved so that people
can shop locally. Pamela Appleby, 500 Almer, also spoke in support of
getting things moving on the Safeway project so local senior citizens who
are dependent on it can walk to the store and have a full choitre of goods.
Nerkis Yaus, 2ll5Hale Drive, concerned about the stop sign on Adeline
which is blocked from view by a tree.
VI. STI]DY ITEMS
No study items for review
YII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Cale4daI - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion ond/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission voles on the motion to adopt.
Chair Keighran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. There were no requests.
2.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 22,2002
1A. 543 CORBITT DRTYE _ ZOIIED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN RE]IEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (ALFREDO REYES, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPUCANT
AND ARCHITECT; DANIEL AND LAURA BERTERRETCTIE, PROPERTY OWNERS) (56
NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER; SEAN O,ROURKE
18.1033 BALBOA AVEI\[]E - ZOIYED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO-
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE. (CHARLES SCHEMBRI,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; STEWART ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (62 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staffreport, commissioners
comments and the findings in the staff reports, with recommended conditions in the staffreport and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the
motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at7:45 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
826 ALPINE AVENUE - ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR SIDE AND REAR SETBACK
VARIANCES FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND
DESIGNER; DAVID MANI, PROPERTY OWNER) (5I NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: SEAN
O'ROURKE
Reference staff report 7 .8.02,with attachments. Planner Keylon presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: can a room be
rented in the single family zone, staffnoted yes so long as there is no second kitchen in the house; what
constitutes a kitchen, staff noted a cooking element; will this house be inspected for the removal of the
kitchen, staff responded yes, a building permit will not be finaled until the plumbing has been removed,
decommissioned or employed for some other use such as a bathroom, commission action can be so
conditioned. There were no further questions from the Commissioners.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Dave Manir qroperty owner, 825 Alpine, apologized for trying
to do construction without a permit, he did not think that replacing and expanding a shed built by his father
and not visible from the street, was such a big deal; he provided documentation ofwork done previously by
his father at the rear of the original garage, he noted that the in-law unit was added in 1952 but had been
remodcled a number of times including most recently in 1984 so that there was nothing left of the 1952
improvements, therefore it did not qualiff for amnesty; his second alternative was to treat the in law unit
area as an additional bedroom, decided to make it a master bedroom suite with a gym area offof it; wants to
appreciate the value of the properly. Commissioner asked where is the garage and room attached to the
house. Applicant noted that the front side of the garage and house are attached for about 6 feet at the rear
side of the house, the room is at the back of the garage and accessible only by going tbrough the yard, the
only way to access the room from the house would be to put a door in the rear wall ofthe Eurage and use the
door from the kitchen into the garage. Commission asked about the hardship on the properly for the2'9"
rear setback. Applicant noted that he is only replacing what is there, there is no other place on the property
which makes sense for this addition, will take too much yard, is located in a rear corner ofthe lot away from
neighbors. Commission discussed with the applicant the possible uses ofthe room and possibility oftaking
offthe shed area and replacing the original rear wall of the garage which appears to be about 13 feet from
the rear property line. Applicant noted that he wished to appreciate the value ofthe property by adding to it,
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes July 22'2002
wanted to make it family friendly. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing
was closed. C. Vistica excused himself from the meeting.
Commissioner discussion: difficult to support this request, cannot make the findings required, the addition
would be close to the neighbor's fence, there are other places on the site to build this exercise room, cannot
support; the existing room at the back of the garage could be used as a gym; cannot see hardship on the
property for the variance, other houses in the area are required to meet rear setback, once a variance is
granted it stays wittr the property, would not be surprised if this area were used as an in-law unit in the
future, there are lots of other ways to add a gym.
C. Boju6s noted that there are a lot of ways to add a gym to this property, in side the house, add on to the
existing house, add a second story, therefore a hardship does not exist on the property for this application
and moved to deny the application by resolution based on the facts presented in the record and the absence
of hardship on the property, there are alter-natives. The motionwas seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on the motion: object to both the replacement of the rehabilitated shed and the additional
construction of the gym, concerned that if it were in a detached structure in the rear yard could consider it
with a conditional use permit; the code requires the primary structure to have a l5 foot setback for the gym
and office, does not meet; if applicant wants he can make a different proposal.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny the request for side and rear setback variances.
The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Vistica absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item
concluded at 8:20 p.m.
Reference staffreport 7 .8.Az,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff
comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing.-IvI*. fvfirr"[u, applicant and]roperty owner represented the
project. H-e noted that he would request u rhung. to the conditions to allow electicity in the storage shed,
and he would be happy to answer questions. Commissioners asked for clarification of the size of the
existing shed and the need for a roll up door; were other t1ryes of doors less "storage unit" appearing
considered; how wide would the roll up door be; why was so much storage space needed outside of the
house?
The applicant responded the existing shed is 120 SF, the roll up door will make it easy to move large items
in and out as well as a motor cycle; no other type of door was considered since this is just a storage shed; the
roll up door will be about 6 feet wide; want to keep furniture stored clean and out of the house. There were
no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: concerned that this large shed can be built to the rear property line when a house
cannot; this is alarge accessory structure in a single family neighborhood, could have 600 SF in a garage
without a conditional use permit and special permit and get the storage needed; could be reduced to from 35
3.36 ARUNDEL ROAD _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTI.JRE (STORAGE) (MICHEL C. MINERVA,
APPLICANT; JIM GARCIA, DESIGNER; RITA MINERVA, PROPERTY OWNER) (68 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: . SEAN O,ROURKE
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission (lnapproved Minutes July 22,2002
feet to 28 feet;proposal will be addition 40%thesize ofthe house, overwhelming cannot support; it would
be visually better to expand the garage; there are other options on the property.
C- Bojuds moved by resolution to deny this application because there is no strong rational for the special
permit and conditional use permit and there are other alternatives on the site, including expanding the garage
which will retain the integrity of the neighborhood and would fit the house better without suctr a targe
structure in the rear yard. The motion was seconded by c. Brownrigg.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny the request for an oversized accessory structure
in the rear yard. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C. Vistica absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were
advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m.
1462 VAI\COIIYER AVENT]E - ZOI\IED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (KEVIN AND LAI,]REN O'SULLIVAN, APPLICAT{TS AND
PROPERTY OWNERS; MICHAEL PALZA,HUNT, HALE AND JONES,ARCHTTECT) (65 NOTTCED)
PROIF,CT PT.A : F,RIKA T,EWTT
Reference staff report 7.8.02, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
Staffcomments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Kevin and Lauren O'sullivan , property owners, stated that they
didn't know what to expect a few weeks ago at the Planning Commission study meeting, but they tried to
address the Commission's concerns expressed at the that meeting. There were no further comments and the
public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: Nice job, came back to Commission with a morc simple design, the window
change with trim added really helped along with the planter boxes; nice refinement of the design. Appears
that applicant is not living there now, would be nice to trim weeds in the driveway.
C. Boju6s moved to approve the application for the reasons stated in the record, by resolution, with the
following conditions:l)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Departrnent date stdmped July l2,z}Oz,sheets SP.l and A.l through A.5, and date stamped June lO,2OOr,
the Landscape Plan and the Site Survey, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area ofthe building
shall require andamendmenttothispermit;2) thattheproperty ownershall beresponsible forimplementing
and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Mayne Tree Expert
Company, Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department Jily 17,2002;3) that any changes to the size
or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),
moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject
to design review; 4) that the conditions ofthe City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's, ChiefBuilding Official's, and
Recycling Specialist's June 10, z}Oz,memos shall be met; 5) that the project shall comply with the proposed
demolition and construction recycling ordinance recently approved by the City Council; 6) that prior to
scheduling the roofdeck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roofridge and provide
certification of that height; 7) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer
or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as
window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional
involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of
perjury; 8) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staffwill inspect and note compliance ofthe
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to
4
4.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 22,2002
the approved Planning and Building plans; and 9) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the
California Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (Cers.
Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:43 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
1336 CARLOS AYENUE _ ZONED R.l - APPTICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK
AND FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION (ERIC
JOHNSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; RALPH JOHNSON, PROPERTY OWNER) (63
NOTICED)PLANNER:ERLKA LEWIT
5.
Commissioner Osterling recused
and stepped down from the dias.
himself from the discussion because he lives within 500 feet ofthe project,
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioner asked if the house has any historic
value, staff stated that they would research further to find out if it was designed by a well known architect.
Commissioner asked if area over 12 feet in height counts twice toward the floor area, and if so, how much of
the area in this project is over 12 feet in height. Staffstated that only the area of the plane at 12 feet in
height counts toward floor area, not the area of the floor below; there is 205 SF in the plane at 12 feet in
height and is counted.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Eric Johnson, property owner of 1336 Carlos Avenue stated
that he has lived in this home for 12 years and is active in his neighborhood. It sounds like a lot of square
footage, however there is no FAR credit for an attached garage, so there is a 400 SF bonus to other
properties. Not interested in detaching the garage due to the sloped roof of the gilrage that ties in with the
house. The front bedroom is actually an office, so house has 3 bedrooms. The garage is setback 60 feet
from the curb, and 30 feet from the face of the house; some people actually thought thJgarage was already
detached. Have to walk out of the house to get into the garage. Want to keep storybook look of the house,
don't want to be penalized for the garage or high ceiling. Commission asked why addition does not have a
rolled roof consistent with the rest of the house; owner stated that it costs too much and would not allow for
gutters, and that could cause serious waterproblems. Owner stated he would match existing roofpitches on
the house but that it would require a special permit for declining height envelope, and he changed the pitch
because he wanted to come in with as few requests as possible.
Commissioner comments on the design;o existing house is beautiful, addition should enhance the existing house;. why doesn't addition have angles like the existing house;o addition looks stuck on; looks like an addition to the house when it should be continuation of the
existing house; addition is not consistent with the existing house;o addition should be just as charming as the house;. concerned with FAR variance request, FAR is over by 600 SF, looks massive; just because garage
is attached and there are areas with ceiling height over 12 feet, does not mean you don't have to
follow code; even if you take off205 SF of floor area that is counted in ceiling height, still looking
ata400 +SF variance; see no need for a floor area variance;. concern with size and mass;
5
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 22,2002
o addition to house appears to have two different styles merged together-bottom has halftimbers and
the top has siding; rooflines and pitches are not consistent;
. have sympathy for large peaks with this design;
o do not encourage detaching garage;
. call out arched windows; and
. house has good fagade now with a box at the rear.
Design review process will help with addressing these issues; doing this addition right will help preserve
the demolition of this house in the future. There were no other conrments from the floor and the public
hearing was closed.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to design review. The motion passed on a
voice vote 5-0- l - l(Cmsr. Osterling abstaining and Cmsr.Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action
is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:00 p.m.
C. Osterling took his seat at the dias.
(68 NOTICED) PRO PLANNER: CATHERINE KEYLON
Planner Keylon briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comrnent. Richard and Maureen Harber, I 434 Columbus Drive, property
owners were available for comment. Stated that they want to enhance the neighborhood and are not asking
for any variances for this project, the project is within the allowable FAR. Nerkis Yaus, property owner of
2l2l Hale Drive, to the right of the subject property, stated that she has no problem with the design but
expressed concem over the duration ofthe demolition and construction and the construction hours. Shejust
leased her property to a new tenant that has a small child. There were no other comments from the floor and
the public hearing was closed.
C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revision has
been made and plan checked:
. more articulation is needed on the right elevation, break up mass.
The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: nice desigrr; can't support motion, there is no backyard, house is at maximum
FAR, tired of whole lot being taken up, design elements are nice but concerned with the size ofthis house,
loss of green space.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-l-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting and C. Vistica
absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9: I lp.m.
6
C. Browrrigg made a motion to send this project to a desigr reviewer with the comments made. This
motion was seconded by C. Auran.
2115 IIALE DRIVE - ZONED R-1- APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETAC}IED GARAGE (CHU DESIGN AND
ENGINEERING, INC., APPLICANTAND DESIGNER; RICIIARD }IARBER, PROPERTY OWNER)
8.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 22,2002
2202 SUMMIT DRIVE _ ZONED R.1- SCOPING SESSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF A
PROPOSED CREEK ENCLOSURE PERMIT TO EXTEND AN EXSTING CONCRETE CULVERT
(WARREN DONALD, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERS; DAVE LUZURIAGA, P.E. LTI INC.,
ENGINEER) (62 NOTICED) PROJECT RUBEN HURIN
Commissioner Osterling recused himself from the discussion because of a business relationship and stepped
down from the dias.
Planner Keylon briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Warren and Jennifer Donald, applicants and property owners,
and Dave Luztriaga,lS40 El Camino Real, project engineer, were available to answer questions. They
noted that in the past the creek had eroded near the sewer line and the City sandbags with concrete as a
result. There is a step drop to the bottom of the creek and they want to make it safe for their children,
existing condition is dangerous. Soils engineer has stated that the proposed creek culvert will help stabilized
the sewer main. Commission asked how much water flows through the drain. Applicaqt stated that during
the summer the drain is dry, but during heavy rain storms in the winter there is a loi of water flowing
through the drain. Last summer had a sewage back up into the creek. Commission noted that the applicant
consulted with the Deparhnent ofFish and Game, asked ifthe applicanthad also contacted the Army Corps
of Engineers. Project engineer stated that they have been working on this project since May 2001 and have
spent a lot of time working out issues with Fish and Game. They are two-thirds ofthe way there. Property
owners are interested in adding usable open spaces since this 2.7 acre site has 75 trees and is very steep,
there is little usable sp?ce; Two frees are proposed for removal under this application, but they would be
replaced with four new trees.
Valerie Carlos of 2818 Easton Drive, support the project since it will make it safer for the children.
However, she is concemed because she lives down grade from the subject property and during hard rain
storms the surface water from the property drains onto her driveway. Twenty years ago during heavy rain
the City had to sandbag her driveway because water was draining down her driveway, through her garage
toward the house. Will the area of run-off increase as a result of this project?
Project engineer responded that the improvement would not add to the drainage, the project is &rlya change
in the method of transfer of water. Area of creek is diminished, calculations show that the 30" pipe can
contain the volume of run-offin the creek. Commission asked where the water goes from the 30" pipe, and
will this channeling increase the velocity. Project engineer stated that the water will go into an open channel
same as now, but 80 feet upstream and the velocity will not increase because the transfer of water is under
the driveway in a flat portion of the lot which will slow the flow.
Issues forinclusion in the environmental review and/orproject review identifiedby the Commissionwere:. ifthere is a large storm event and the rain flow exceeds the 30" drainage pipe capacity will there be
floodingupsfteam (abovethe culve$ andwill this overflow increase the sitenrn-offto neighboring
properties;
o will this project increase surface run-offto adjacent properties; ando explain culvert fill process and fill stability: tlpe and amount of material; how will it be laid; will it
be compacted; and what will be the surface finish over the fill.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Staffwas directed to
address the identified issues in the Initial Study and environmental document. Commission agreed that this
7
]
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 22,2002
item could be brought back directly to action after the notification period for the environmental document
has expired. This item concluded at 9:30 p.m.
C. Osterling took his seat at the dias.
X. PLANNERREPORTS
Update on status ofNorth (west) End SAP and Bayfront/Anza SAP
CP Monroe discussed the time line for the advanced planning and current planning projects for the coming
year. She noted the meeting dates in September for workshops for the North End Specific Area Plan and
Bayfront/Anza Area SAP update as well as the variety of subcommittee meetings. She noted that the
Council would be considering the appointments for the Bayfront/Anza SAP advisory board in Algust and
this group, with three Planning Commissioners included, would sponsor the workshops for the
Bayfront/Anza planning effort. Chair Keighran noted that the Mills-Peninsula l{ospital project would
probably be submitted for City review within the next year. It would be appropriate for a subcommittee of
the Commission to become involved in learning about that project during the preparation ofthe DEIR. For
that reason she wished to appoint another subcommittee to oversee that work when it happens. She
suggested Cers. Brownrigg, Keele and Auran, who agreed. CP Monroe said that she would let the
subcommittee know when the project was submitted. The subcommittee to work with staff on the
implementation of the first year's work program for the Housing Element (Cers. Auran, Brownrigg,
Osterling) agreed to try to meet before the end of August; CP Monroe will ty to find a date.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Keighran adjourned the meeting at9:45 p.m.
Ralph Osterlirig,r Secretary
8
UNAPPROVEDMINUTESOT.22
Respectfu lly submitted,
07 -L7 - 02 SUMMARY OF
FOR:
Crime Cl-assif ication. .
Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter
Manslaughter by Negligence
Rape By Force
Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape
Robbery Firearm
Robbery Knife
Robbery Ot.her Dangerous Weapon
Robbery Strong-Arm
Assault - Firearm
Assault - Knife
Assault - Other Dangerous l^treapon
Assault - Hands, Fists, Feet
Assault - Other (Simple)
Burglary - Forcible Entry
Burglary - Un1awful Entry
Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry
Larceny Pocket-Picking
Larceny Purse-Snatching
Larceny Shoplifting
Larceny From Motor Vehicle
Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories
Larceny Bicycles
Larceny From Building
Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine
Larceny Al1 Other
Motor Vehicle Theft Auto
Motor Vehicle Theft Bus
Motor Vehicle Theft Other
PART ONE OFFENSES
JUNE, 2OO2
PAGE: 1
Last.
Current. Year..
Act
YTD.
Prev
Act
YTD.
I
1
o
0
0
5
U
+
1
0
11
1
1
1
0
4
0
6
0
Z
3
1
9
11
3
1
L4
6
7
1
4
ZZ
9
3
z
L4
7
I
6
L2
6
4
Z
37
I
3
92
25
35
1
0
0
20
o,
46
15
8
L6
109
46
2
z
11
3
B5
89
42
4
3
3
20
4B
t6
d
217
5
21,
67
1
1
I
3
1
94 77 549 667
94 77 549 667
!
01 -L7 - 02
Crime Classification.
A11 Other Offenses
Animal Abuse
Animal Nuisance
Arson
Assists to Outside Agencies
Bicycle Violations
Bigamy
Bomb Offense
Bomb Threat.
Bribery
Check Offenses
Child Neglect /prot custodY
Computer Crime
Conspiracy
Credit Card Offenses
Cruelty to Dependent Adult
Curfew and Loitering Laws
Death Investigation
Disorderly Conduct
Driver' s License Violat.ions
Driving Under the fnfluence
Drug Abuse Violations
Drug/Sex Registrants
Drunkeness
Embez zlement
Escape
Extortion
False Police Reports
False Reports of EmergencY
Fish and Game Violations
Forgery and Counterfeiting
Found Property
I'raud
Gambling
Harrassing Phone Calls
Hit and Run Accident.s
Impersonation
Incest
Indecent Exposure
Intimidating a Witness
Kidnapping
Lewd Conduct
Liquor Laws
Littering/numping
Marijuana Violations
Mental Health Cases
Missing Person
Missing Property
Municipal Code Violations
Narcotics SaIes/wtanufacture
Offenses Against Children
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES
CITY REPORT FOR: JUNE, 2002
PAGE: 1
LasL
Year.
Act
YTD.
Prev
Act
YTD.Current
31
1
52
)
13
L4
15
43
20
25
4L
18
0
39
35
Z
0
3
0
1
Z
a
1
L4
43
t2
5'7
20
0
8
L77
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3
1
1,2
26
4
0
2B
2
0
0
0
1
0
265
.)
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
10
L7
0
1
7
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
A=
3
B
3
A
3
4
2
5
2
q
1
4t
29
5
45
23
1
4L
L5
0
0
0
1
U
13
52
10
0
36
15
I
0
9
0
0
0
5
0
a6
53
1B
111
26
0
aZ
4
7
1
4
10
7
1
1
1
1
7
2
10
3
2
B
4
18
7
Z
07 -L7 -02 MONTHLY SUMMARY
CITY REPORT
Crime Classification. . . . . .
OF PART TWO OFFENSES
FOR: JUNE, 2OO2
PAGE: 2
Last
Current Year.
9
1
46
1
Act
YTD
Prev
Act
YTD.
t4
1
5
1
1
1
18
5
3
1
3
5
6
85
lt
l.07
0
0
0
0
0
0
2t
a
0
a
0
4
6
0
1
n
Z
32
0
36
1_9
3L7
Z
3
0
0
92
4
32
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
7
4
0
5
1
0
1
0
3
24
0
2
3
1
3
1
4
19
5
2
l
45
29
27L
B
0
0
0
138
)'7
10
126
zv
L2
5
3
aa
9
0
5
)1
9
0
222 246 L,393 1,'728
)))246 L,393 1,'728
Other Assaults
Other Juvenil-e Offenses
Other Police Service
Pandering for immoral Purposes
Parole Violations
Perj ury
Possession of BurglarY Tool-s
Possession of drug ParaPhernalia
Possession of obscene literat.ure;picture
Probation Violations
Prostitution and Commercial- Vice
Prowling
Resisting Arrest
Runaways (Under 18)
Sex Offenses
Sex Offenses against Children
Sodomy
Stalking
Statutory RaPe
Stolen Property; Buying ; Receiving; Possess
Suspended License
'1'ax Livasron
Temp Restraining Orders
Terrorist Threats
Towed Vehicle
Trespassing
Truant s f Incorrigible Juvs
US Mail Crimes
Vagrancy
Vandalism
Vehicle Code Violat.ions
Violation of Court Order
Warrants - Felony
Warrants - Misd
Weapons ; Carrying, Possessing
Welfare Fraud
07 -L7 - 02
Crime Classification.
Parking Citations
Movi-ng Citations
MONTHI.,Y SUMMARY OF CITATIONS
CITY REPORT
FOR: JUNE, 2002
Last
Current Year..
PAGE: 1
3 ,556
277
3 , o'7L
L72
L7,760
1_ ,394
Act
YTD
Prev
Act
YTD.
16,513
l,]-96
3,833 3,243 1-9,L54 1-'l ,'709
3,833 3,243 L9,L54 77 ,709
,.
Officer Productj-vity. . . .
Reported On: All Officers
Data Type Reported on: PARKING
officgr:ID:
VaIid
Cnt
BURLINGAME
generated on 07 /71 /2002 at \2:27:00 PM
Report Range: 06 /07/2002 to 06/30/2002
t All
Valid
VoidE
Cnt
t AlI
voids Valid
t
DAZA-QUIROZ
GARRETT
HARRISON
JFOX
KIRKPATRICK
MORAN
ROSCOE
634
5 01-
506
505
502
201
503
89'7
283
LO27
368
524
20'7
"19
26.50
8.36
30.34
10.87
15.48
6.12
a aa
26.00
8.00
28.00
12 .00
22.00
0.00
4.00
98.57
98.6r
98.66
98.40
9'7.94
100.00
97.53
13
4
L4
6
11
U
2
Tota]-3385 50
Page 1 of, 1
lnvestments
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
June 30,2002
Par Market
Valuo
Book
Value
c/c ol
Portfollo Term
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
360 Equlv.
YTM
365 Equiv.Value
LAIF & County Pool
CORP NOTES
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
18,728,872.62
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
18,728,872.62
2,085,000.00
8,081,870.00
18,72E,872.62
1,997,500.00
8,000,000.00
65.20
6.95
27,85
1
1,827
1,507
1
610
1,123
3.214
6.095
4.910
3.258
6.179
4.979
28,728,872.62 28,895,742,62 28,726,372.62 100.00%547 356 3.886 3.940
Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
166,080.71
30,195,477.45
6.69%
available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas
1 ,718,061 .53
coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
Enterprise funds).Tax, Trust & Agency funds,
2-21142
't,718,061.53
34,143,494.99
5.03%
requirements for the
Capital Projects, and
Pursuant to State law, there
RAHN A. BECKER,DIR./TREASURER
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMI ) SymRept V5.02f
Run Dale'. 07 12412002 . 09:'l 6
CUSIP lnvGtmont # lssuer
Average
Balance
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
June 30, 2002
Purchaso
Date Par Value
Stated
Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value
YTM Days to
385 Maturlty
Page2
Maturlty
Oato
LAIF & County Pool
77
79
LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD.
S M COUNTY POOL
Subtotal and Average
8,980,837.40
s,74f,O35.22
8,980,837.40
9,748,035.22
8,960,837.40
9,748,O35.22
2.670
3.800
2.670
3.800
18,445,560.12 18,728,872.62 18,728,872.A2 18,728,872.62 3.258 1
CORP NOTES
0739028tvt9 BEAR STEARNS CORP
Subtotal and Average
487 03/02/1999 2,000,000.00 2,0E5,000.00 1 ,997,500.00 6.150 6.179 610 03102J2004
6.179 0102,308,584.00 2,000,000.00 2,085,000.00 t,997,500.00
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
3133M3TS4 476
3133MLMH5 505
312925PN4 506
3136F0Y29 502
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP.
FANNIE MAE
Subtotal and Average 9/433'33:1.3:l
03/1 7/1 998
0212612002
o6t0612002
0812812001
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
1,027,500.00
2,019,380.00
't,013,750.00
4,021,240.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
6.020
4.000
4.125
5.420
6.020
4.002
4.125
5.420
259 03t17t2003
879 11126t2004
885 12t06t2004
1,519 08/28i2006
8,000,000.00 8,081,870.00 8,000,000.00 4.979 1,123
Total lnvestment3 and Average 30,185,477.45 28,728,872.42 28,895,742.62 28,726,372.62 3.940 356
Portfollo CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Dale: 07|24QOO2 - 09:16
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Actlvlty By Type
June 1,2002 through June 30,2002
Page 3
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Boglnnlng
Balance
Stated
Rate
Transactlon
Datc
Purchases
or Doposlts
Sales/Maturlties
or Wthdrawals
Endlng
Balance
LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary)
79 SMCOUNryPOOL
Subtotal
3.800 323,503.71 0.00
18,/t05,36E.0t 323,503.71 0.00 18,728,872,e2
CORP NOTES
37042R2C5 489 0.00 1,030,280.00GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP
Subtotal
6.750 06t10t2002
3,027,780.00 0.00 1,030,280,00 1,997,500.00
Fedsral Agency lssues - Coupon
313slLKK3 499
31s3M7Y75 486
312925PN4 506
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEOERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP.
Subtotal 1t,000,000.00
5.800
6.000
4.125
oalfit2002
o6t13t2002
o6toBl2002
0.00
0.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
t,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 8,000,000.00
Total 32,/133,14E.91 1,32!,503.7{5,030,280.00 28,726,372.62
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 0712412002 - 09]t6
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnvestment Activlty Summary
June 2001 through June 2002
Ylold to Maturlty
Page 4
Average
Days to Matutlty
Month Number ot
Securitl6s
Total
lnvest€d
360 365
Equlvalsnt Equlvalent
Managed
Pool
Rate
Number
of Securltlos
Purcha3od
Number
of Socurltios
Matured / Sold
Average
TermEndYear
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
Aprll
May
June
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
13
15
14
15
12
12
12
11
11
10
10
9
7
36,085,177.06
38,447,819.42
38,002,167.12
34,930,381.22
32,614,594.78
33,056,179.95
35,671,743.12
34,732,791.56
32,802,148.54
30,605,734.76
35,999,602.11
32,433,148.91
28,726,372.62
5.431
5.396
5.287
5.352
4.880
4.812
4.629
4.497
4.441
4.419
4.147
4.169
3.886
5.507
5.471
5.361
5.426
4.948
4.879
4.694
4.559
4.503
4.480
4.204
4.227
3.940
4.767
4.632
4.4U
4.214
3.809
3.683
3.474
3.232
3.237
3.317
3.134
3.237
3.258
989
1,047
1,089
1,289
1,028
1,014
940
928
933
880
749
718
547
764
817
860
1,020
791
763
691
662
658
580
480
428
356
1
2
1
,|
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
'l
2
0
2
0
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
3
Average 12 34,162,143.17 4.719%4.784%3.729 1 1 935 682
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept V5.02f. Run Datei 07 124D002 - 09:16
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Distribution of lnvestments By Type
June 2001 through June 2002
Page 5
June
2001 2001
MayJulyAugrct Soptombor
2001 2001
October November December
2001 2001 2001
January February
2002 2002
March
2002
Aprll
2002
June
2002
Average
by Perlodlnvestment Type 2002
LAIF & Gounty Pool 40.4 36,2 38.1 26.9 41.7 42.4 46.7 48.1 45.0 47.6 55.5 56.8 65.2 45.4%
Gertificates of Deposit - Bank
Gertificates of Deposit - S & L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift & Ln
Negotlable GD's - Bank
CORP NOTES 8.4 7.9 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.9 8.4 9.3 7.09.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 8.6%
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper - lnterest Bearing
Commerclal Paper - Dlscount
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 51.3 55.9 53.9 il.4 49.1 48.4 44.9 43.2 45.7 42.5 36.1 33.9 27.9 45.9o/o
Federal Agency lssuos . Discount
Treasury Securitles - Coupon
Treasury Securities . Oiscount
Miscellaneous Securities . Goupon
Miscellaneous Securitles - Discount
Non lnterest Bearing lnvestments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Mlscellaneous Discounts .At Gost 2
Mlscellaneous Discounts -At Gost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PMs) SymRept Vs.02fRun Date: 0712412002 - 09:16
GITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
lnterest Earnings Summary
June 30,2002
June 30 Month Endlng Fiscal Year To Date
Page 6
CD/Coupon/Discount lnvestments:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Eamed during Period
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Eamings during Period
97,937.50
162,765.13
208,283.88)
0.00)
1,271,137.50
162,76s.13
337,083.33)
0.00)
52,418.75
u,720,00
1,096,819.30
65,970.00
117,138.75 1,162,789.30
Pass Through Securitles:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period
lnterest Eamed during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Period
0.00
0,00
0.00)
0,00)
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
Gash/Checklng Accounts:
lnterest Collected
Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period
Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period
lnterest Earned during Period
0.00
413,452.10
364,510.14)
567,il0.24
413,452,10
425,720.111
48,941,96 555,272.23
Total lnterest Earned durlng Period
Total Capital Galns or Losses
101,360.71
64,720.00
1,652,091.53
65,970.00
Run Oate: 07 12412002 - 09: 1 6
Total Earnlngs durlng Perlod 166,080.71 1,718,06't.53
Portfolio CITY
CP
PM (PRF_PM6) SymRept V5.02f
((
((
(
(
(
(
((
lnvestments
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
June 30,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value '/t ol
Portfollo
Days to
Maturlty
YTM YTM
Value Term 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Federal Agency lssues - Coupon
lnvestments
800,000.00 825.752.OO 802,000.00 100.00 1,756 441
4'l
4.995
4.995
5.064
800,000.00 825,752.00 802,000.00 100.00% 1,756 5.064
Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Flscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effectlve Rate of Return
41,000.00
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
is restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital ProJects, and Enterprise funds).
> ^2V-oZ
Rahn Becker, Finance
3,416.66
802,000.00
5,180/o
41,000.00
802,000.00
5.11%
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate: 0712412002 . 09:06
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Avorage
Balance
95BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
June 30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Daysto
365 Maturity
Page2
Maturlty
Date
LAIF
79 LOCAL AGENCY INV. FD.0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 5.707
Subtotal and Average 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
Federal Agency lssues - Goupon
3133M5089 485 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average
802,000.00 5.125 5.064 441 0911512003
5.064 41
11124t1998 800,000.00 825,752.OO
802,000.00 800,000.00 825,752.00 802,000.00
Total lnvo3tmontr and Avoraga 802,000.00 800,000.00 E25,752.00 802,000.00 5.064 41
Portfolio 95BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 07/2412002 - 09:06
lnvestments
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
June 30,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value
'h ot
Porffollo
Days to
Maturlty
YTM
360 Eguiv.
YTM
365 Equiv,Value Term
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
'1,710,000.00 1,759,162.50 1,710,000.00 100.00 1,826 268 5.977
268 5.977
6.060
1,710,000.00 1,759,162.50 1,710,000.00 100.00% 1,826 6.060
Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Flscal Year Ending
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are
RAHN BECKER, Finance Director/Treasurer
8,M7.77 103,626.00 103,626.00,t,710,000.00 1,710,000.00
6.01% 6.06%
avallable funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital ProJects, and Enterprise funds).1-2\47
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02fRun Dalei 07 12412002 - 09:1 0
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer
Avorage
Balance
98BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Detalls - lnvestments
June 30,2002
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value
YTM DaFto
365 Maturlty
Page2
Maturlty
Oate
Managed Pool Accounts
80 LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND
Subtotal and Average
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Federal Agency Goupon Securities
3133M3XEO 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
Subtotal and Average
03/26/1996 1,710,000.00 1,759,162.50
-
1,710,000.00 1,759,162.50
1 ,710,000.00 6.060
1,7{0,000.00
6.060 268 03t26t2003
6.060 2681,710,000.00
Total lnvestments and Average 1,710,000,00 1,710,000.00 1,759,182.50 {,7l0,ooo.oo 6.060 288
Portfolio 98BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Oate:0712412002 - 09:10
lnvestments
01 BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
June 30,2002
Par Market
Value
Book
Value
r/o ot
Portfollo
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equlv,
YTM
365 Equlv.Value Term
Managod Pool Accounts
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
lnvestments
4,947,305,63
1,100,000.00
4,947,305.63
1,104,807.00
4,947,305.63
1,100,000.00
61.81
18.19
1
1,826
1
1,506
275
2.633
5.474
2.670
5.550
6,047,305.63 6,052,112.63 6,047,305.63 100.00./o 333 3.150 3.194
Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effectlve Rate of Return
Pursuant to State law, there are
17,078.96 377,801.02 377,801.02
6,447,905.63
3.22o/o
available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is
& Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
1-Zcl-az
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V5.02f
Rahn A. Becker, Finance ./Treasurer
Run Date: 0712412002 - 09;1'l
CUSIP lnvostment# lssuer
Average
Balance
Ol BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details . lnvestments
June 30, 2002
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
Stated
BookValue Rate
YTM Daysto
385 Maturlty
YTM
Page2
Maturity
Oate360
Managed Pool Accounts
81 Local Agency lnv. Fd
Subtotal and Average
08/09/2001 4,947,305.03 4,S47,305.63 4,947,305.63 2.670 2.633 2.670
5,347,805.63 4,047,305.83 4,947,305.63 4,947,305.63 2.633 2.670
Federal Agency Goupon Securities
3133MGQR0 503 Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Avoraga
081151200',1 1,100,000.00 1,104,807.00 1,100,000.00 5.550 5.474 5.550 1,506 0E/15/2006
I,100,000.00 5.474 5.550 1,5061,100,000,00 1,100,000,00 't,104,807.00
Total lnvestments and Average 6,'147,805.63 6,047,305.63 6,052,t 12.83 6,047,305.63 3.150 3.{94 275
Portfolio 01BD
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02fRun Date: 07/2412002 - 09:1 1
I
CITY OF BARLINGAME
TEIS I.{ONTE
MONTITLY PERMIT ACTMTY JLINE, 2002
BUILDING INSPECTION
I.AAT YE,AR
TO D4EE
PIEC.A,IJ YEAR,
TO DITE
PerDl! typr
Ne\,r single Family
New lqult.i -I'aJniIY
New comnercial
AlEeratslonE-Rea
Alteratlons -NonRea
Demolition
swinuning PooI
SIgn Permitg
Fences
Reroofing
RepairE
tiindow RepL
Mi6ceLlaneouB
valuaElou
$410,000
9o
$o
$738,500
iL , L61 ,4O0
$o
$o
$19, 000
$o
$329,589
$s3, soo
$29,133
$116,5s5
IAST llONTE
# valu.tlor
2 $600,000
o $0
0 $0
33 $2,300,600
L $4L,92s
9 $500
1 $1,500
1 $3,000
0 90
32 9410,312
2 $20,000
6 $10s,980
4 $29 ,924
SA.I{E I{ONTE
Llg T YEAR
valuacl,o!
9s50, 000
s247 ,00o
$o
$2 ,236 ,1,00
s349, s00
$o
$o
$s,900
$o
$120,050
$37, soo
$21,700
$1s7, 000
VaIuatl.oD
$2. 110, 000
$o
$148,000
s7 ,227 ,660
i1"3 ,677 ,9L6
$2o,10o
$72, 500
$48,000
$o
$1,6s2,658
$146,6s0
$25s,9s7
$1, 040,008
valuatlou
92, 162 , 1s0
$247,000
$2,88s,000
$6,e84,742
$4, S08,7s0
$111, s00
$142,138
$s5,0s3
$o
$1,099,954
$302,100
1232 ,293
$a7L , L44
valuatLoD
s4, ?20, 000
$o
$10,248,000
sL2 ,525 ,469
$18,s92,824
ss9,1oo
$94,500
$88,82s
$5,700
$3, 110, 09s
$154,7s0
$487, 818
$1,551,237
#
1
0
0
22
7
7
0
0
19
11
#
1
0
9
3
0
0
15
5
#
6
0
3
t67
37
31
16
0
119
24
35
42
*
7
1
3
L32
41
25
10
13
0
105
22
26
53
*
L4
0
7
307
67
58
6
26
32
65
84
TOTAJ,S......83 $2,863,878 91 $3,s13,841 66 i3,134,7sO 48s 926,399t449 438 $19'802'834 91s $s2'0s0'318
7 /o!/ 02 7:50:09
TEIS YET,R
TO DATE
Name of Agency:
Mailing Address:
Contact Person:
Fax Number:
Offlce Phone No:
2002Local Agency Biennial Notice
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010
James Nantell, Executive Director
650 - 342-8386
650 - 558-7204
tr The code needs to be amended and the following amendments are necessary
(Check all that apply)
O lnclude new positions (including consultants) that must be designated O Revise the
titles of existing positions o Delete the titles of positions that have been abolished
O Revise the titles of existing positions
O Delete the titles of positlons that have been abolished
O Delete the positions that manage public investments
O Revise disclosure categories
O Other
No amendments are necessary. The agency's code accurately designates all positions
that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions; the disclosure
categories assigned to those positions accurately require the disclosure of all
investments, business positions, interests in real property and sources of income which
may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those designated
positions; and the cod
Section 87302.
cludes all other provisions required by Government Code
Signature ol Executive Dheclot
Date
You must complete this report regardless of how recenfly your code was approved or
amended.
Please return this report no later than October'1, 2002 to:
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined
that:
f,
Name of Agency
Mailing Address:
Contact Person:
Fax Number:
Office Phone No
2002Local Agency Biennial Notice
BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORIry
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010
James Nantell, Executive Director
650 - 342-8386
650 - 558-7204
.t
d
This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined
that:
D The code needs to be amended and the following amendments are necessary:
(Check a that apply)
O lnclude new positions (including consultants) that must be designated O Revise the
titles of existing positions o Delete the titles of positions that have been abolished
O Revise the titles of existing positions
O Delete the titles of positlons that have been abolished
O Delete the positions that manage public investments
O Revise disclosure categories
O Other
p No amendments are necessary. The agency's code accurately designates all positions
that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions; the disclosure
categories assigned to those positions accurately require the disclosure of all
investments, business positions, interests in real property and sources of income which
may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those designated
pos itions; and the code includes all other provisions required by Government Code
Signalurc of Executive Director
Data
You must complete this report regardless of how recenfly your code was approved or
amended.
Please return this report no later than October 1, 2OO2lo:
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Section 87302.
r
AUG - 5 2002 fa aa_z
-x?oz
,' tez^c.4J.-/.7-eZ
a54*-<
rr
Lf //
l'
Mr./[Irs. Dmbl R March
15@ i,lwlands Are
Brlingame. CA 9tO'tG5241t
a/a..*
5alu J"C /3 2002/^3r
/he ,4rort 3'aay 1,4/a/K use 4o/,nil
,r/r,//rV Thb ,fan//g
t4
Ea../,e af a
()
'31*
A o/or fe/r-e-rnrA /!,>// af Yr'ea)
J
oar
4al rac /a-/rg naTa/ra/r'b/a€ e/erz t5
C, a smo// /orz t/L a /Esr *a-area_,t
Mr./lltt. Daid R Xarc*r
1569 tlekdsAre
ButngailE, CA9CI1G5241
1."/,4X arez /r**qtrreE r fr*/""*4j/
,ij't&
nzl,)
r. t
l
5,'3o A,/14,
fracks, lanJ,
Au/ac arr t'/e-
Y // / '/t1/{/1,'/T,i
I. dear,:n" I*"
I
,'
.--"L
.t
I
a*,
t ' 'd {
tirtt
q
'.a-.t
-<*--:.
-{
ri;
f
t.--,.-ra-*a
-i
l
'"{.
F
t.,{'
lrr
I
a:.:i4:a--
t
...i
.:;
'it t ^
I
-&
' 'rt.
t.
{
ry,l
a
'+ ri
It'
a
I
'5ah.nq
,,7Zn /r'ort 3 :
0,{ VA'otc r li
ilai ,rurl ,
O, a sfi-ttzt
€l
h:€rl
1
t!{li{ ':
lfi r#e{,'t
.jV
_'"-rY
It
,s
**,r '*
*.#*.* -. .4, a .-rf
+n*
&|}Q.\
*l
w
-'***
\\ i
*
Ac *r.eaI
l-)/t:d---|ldlttY,
a
$
t
*eqei *s-:
,
**
ra!
G
,
r
* ; ' :::r1'-t
$
.Ip 1i.,
.\
L
folcler corl
wwrg. MeadWeb.coln,. . :,
' ''- i:: '
34002 0?000TheMead
''.I
t *&T}CDGr(EI-&
:llYe:x:97e
'j,:!: ,!
K; .\s
I
iQ
niiiir
#,i\.i
th;
fi.e
I
y',
b *ll't rS at tt t/
s,{,frtrt o/rt f !
, ui, {,i r' ,r *lte
6 rvr*tl /a-ri'-
\
t
I
J
i':
q.\-
?r
t-
t,r
Tone' n€ "?,;7 g"rl'z3o-
I ,t
:j
t>
8ffi$
\:u '-
$.165t-.g: ir...{,"._
i r ,'
i''yr*t't ;
*.
hl,
*
fx'""3.,,.
.t
'17
r*3,xl
t-
,tai:!.t*
?
r:.l
ll *ts*t€ro &5
t/
Fark I ;it ,cre')
T.
,
3
L
1
j.
!t
;
T
t
*f ft ,*\i\'s
Q,
I
.&'
J . .T Jl..r."*'r'
'/t
*
I
r*{
ixr
l-,..a:..
7Ve
po
-fr, 4,
'@r
, ,,\14 al/ /
U,I
t
4fi*.*
/?ef,s{',ftt
t
r
l,il
loi /,
fe .1,-11 ',f I,'t L' t
ti
I
.xa
;
I
r::6
5r
A '*
T n-.
H
',* -
I,
c;
"ffgsr"dtrg " l€ {l'
le4tndl s{fcr
l*i/g,* /Y*r'r;21
I
5an7/g Cler<- ri4/piit,t af hri",
'r',1 /cc kea' €u?ft/ *
u;&e* fial ffr€
.fu rc, lett ,.Lu$fo*,_
Et
!:
tl.ry
I
i"
a
-,
ll
Uhn @ilg af Wurlingame
CITY HALL _ 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 03997
TEL: (6so) 5s&7204
FAX (6s0) s56-9281
Web: www.burlingame.org
Iuly 29,2002
Mr. and Mrs. March
1569 Newlands Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. and Mrs. March:
This is in response to your July 23letter relative to the Avon 3-Day Walk fundraiser and its impact on the residents
adjoining Pershing Park. I'm sorry that this annual event, which was held on Saturday, July 13, 20O2,had adverse
impacts on you and other residents.
As you know, because we do not take these kinds of events lightly, we do require approval by our City Council to
ensure that community members have an opportunity to discuss any concems with the council. I appreciate your
having taken the time to communicate with us some of the concems that you experienced from this year's event. I
can assure you that they will be taken into consideration in responding to any future request for the use of Pershing
Park as part of the Avon Walk fundraiser. You should be aware that we have also received correspondence from
another resident in the neighborhood regarding their belief that the minor impact inflicted on the neighborhood is
clearly outweighed by the benefit of the charitable dollars that are generated by the event.
Based on the article that you attached to your letter, it loo}s as though there is some question about the future of the
event. However, as a result of your letter I assure you that should we receive a request again next year, we will be
sure to contact you by letter to invite you to participate in the council's review of the permit requeit. In addition,
we will work with the sponsor to see if we could avoid the use of Pershing Park as a rest area. If it appears that it
would be hard to relocate the rest area, it is possible that we would ask the Parks and Recreation Commission to
review the matter and develop &recommendation for the City Council relative to using the Pershing neighborhood
park as a rest stop.
Once again, I apologize for the impact you experienced this year and want to thank you for taking the time to
communicate your concerns. Your letter will be included on the acknowledgments for the Council meeting of
August 5.
4ilW
James Nantell
City Manager
c: City Council
Parks and Recreation Commission
1569 NewlandsAvenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
July 23, 2002
James Nantell
Burlingame City Manager
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear James Nantell:
We, Neudands Avenue horneormers, are writing to you because we are extremely di$eased
that Bur[ngerne officials saw fit to ofier srnafr Peshing Park at Cresent and Nerylands Avenues as a
"pit stop' twice norrtr for the huge Avon $Day Walks that invotued over 3,000 walkers in July, 2001,
and over 4,400 walkers plus support personnel in July, 2002. Both years yve expressed our @ncems
by phone to city departments; the courleous response ule received ms that only uiEen conoerns
would be given seli:us consideration. We krrenr that our adiacent ae$hbors on bdh sides wodd be
away all or part of this yeafs \ralk day." So, we made sure to stay home all day Salurday, July 13,
?O0z,to observe and document this event. We took notes and numerous photogaphs.' Pleasq give your atention io the foiloryturg dawn to dusk acoount of July 13,2W2, at Pershing
Park. Abo incltded are ndes on reHed eyerds precedrrg and folhna*lg lhd day, as.wefl as pertinent
endosures. Times given are rounded off by minutes bul very close to actual. Keep in mind as you
read that very large vehlies and crorvds generale noise, congestion, and safedy concems.
Wednesdav. Julv 10. 2(F2 An Avm form b6er {copy endosed)was hard-delfueled to the doorslepc
cf Persh'ng Park aea resider[s $ding that the lrrdK rrcuH recur at P. Park on Sabrday, July 13,
2002. This was the firsil and only ommunication ure received about the imminent event we heard
nothing from the City of Budingame. Apparently City Council hal approved this event d some tirne
without eliciting input from the irnmediale neighbofiood; pfvate resklences sunound Pershing Part.
Thursdav. Julv 11. 2002 City of Burlingame "No Parking - Tow Away Zone' sawhorses appeared all
abng the Crescent Ave. curlr of P. Part. Smaller hand lettedng stated '4 A.M. to 5 P.M. Sd. July 13.'
These signs are stiU there as vye compbte this wiling on Tuesday, July 23, 20O2-
Fdday. Julv 12. 2002 30 toilets were trucked in and placed on the asphafi play area of Pershing Park.
The toibts were bcked with lightu eigm strip bcks; at bast one had been broken open befiore
eveniqg. $ote: ln 2fi)l 3O lotets served 3,fiD+ persons; the same #, 30, served 4300+ mzolfiz-
5:3O A.M. to 5:45 A.ltN. We rryere arakened by sourds from motors and gears of trucks much larger
than usua[yhavdthesesilreets- We began orrobservdbns: thereyrerettree hugeflatbed trailer
trucks, a large rentd moving van, and several vans and aulos on Nevylands and Grescent Avenues. A
forktifl with backup safety beeper sounding uras unloading cargo onto the park grass.
5:45 A.ll. onoclino to 7:3gA.ll. Numerous personsworted at dfirg up snack pavfllons, #.,
thtot1gfiod the pr*. Ifue ms ao apparent €ffod to keepdoyyn tre noise bvel
7:30 A.M. onooino to 1:00 P.M. A sleady slream d walkers came across Banoilhet doyyn Crescent
across Nadands into P. Park. Wdkers uere grceted non-sfiop by "ctreerbaders'shotrting ard
bbuYing moufir honrs. AI4,4fi) w*ed wr a horneowner-ma[ntdned grass sn ip befure c,rossfg
Navlands irdo the pa*, a&8mugh they corid have been directed to use a nearby drivermy- There are
no construcled or marted @eslrian crossings at the Crescent/Nsrlands intersedbn.
Althousn uralkers were anivlng and deparling, the park rms covered with peofle for several
hours due to the sheer rnrmber inrpfued. Many vet$des f[ed with'supporters'were circfrB, provitling
honking ard cfeedng. On one such van were large signs: "P|II/IPMOBILE - WE PICK UP
STREETWALKERS.'The tired walkers overafi dirl nd seem overtly noisy, "supporters'seemed intent
on produchg bud vo&me-
Perhaps some support vehides were parked in "l-ot Ff as per the Avon leter- Slfll, rnany
\mlk+elded vehiJes of vari:d size rrere pa*ed at ard dfving pa$ P. Park for hours. These
induded a slandby ambulance, a moving van, several motorcycles, Hs of cars and passenger vans,
and three hlghuaay-size 'Coach - USA' passenger buses (which had real ditriculty maneuvering
around the palm tee islald at Crescent and l,lenvlands,) Several vehides were poorly parked, as
much as trc feet frcrn lhe curb-
Some young, ticyde riding'pdbe', apparently afniated uith the walk, sperf a tot of time
grouped together chdling. All day ute never saw any Budingame police or fire depanment pensonnel
d this event thd invirlvild lhiii.isands of people, mosily non-eurfnilafc residentg pcst 9-11-o1 !
12:00 noon to 2:30 P.M. While later walkers vvere s{il| arrMng and treing cheercd, the walk dean-up
crew began pickng up garbage to the accornpaniment of loudly amffied music. The cban up of the
gra$i area was fah widesPread gnal piees of liter and some pfasft bdtes rernained, and one park
trashcan uas bfl overfuwiqg- Andtrertruck ariyed !o be baded wf,h bags of garhe.
JUL 2 6 2002
'atlalk Daf at Pershing Park - Saturdav. Julv 13.2002
The loud music was not tumed down until a family arrived lo set up a child's birlhday party in
lhe arbor area aboul 1:30 P.M. As the family and their guests were aniving, a bb tank truck drove
onlo the adracenl asphalt area and began noisily pumping out the 30 loilels. Anolher tanket an aited in
lhe streel. Aner an hour of pumping, the lankers and remaining walk-crew ard lheir vehides depalted
aboul 2:30 P.M- Left behind were 30 toilets, a large carilo conlainer, and other piec€s of equipmenl.
We learned from the paiy family (San Maleo Park residents) that they had recen{y c€lled to
reserve space d Washinglon Park for their Juty 13 party. They \xere told lhat large W- Park was fuly
reservd but that no reservalion was needed lo use small Pershing Park- They were not loH lhal P.
Park would be a pit stop for lhousands on lhe day ot their party.
3:30 P.M. The three oversize fl4bed cargo lrailer-trucks thal had come at 5:30 A.M. reappeared, The
beeFing foftlifr was used io assisl bading up lhe remainhg equipmert (olher than the toileb.)
Gouges and lrac-lG t €re leff in park grass by the fo*Eff. The entire lawn looked battered.
6:15 P.M. Another ffatbed truck with trailer drove orio lhe park asphalt. The dfver and a yyo*er
loaded up lhe hsl eighleen loilets- Casusl pa* visitors were nearby, as on mosl SaturdaF. Affer lhe
second load of loilels departed, \ e looked al the area where the toilets had stood. Lots of u,et stains
(urine?), to et tissue, and empty tissue rclls were hff behind. We look photos bebr6 the ry€ttess
evaporated and the wind Hew mosl llssue into lhe btrshes. \ /ilhin the hour unkno.,ing park visilors
were playing basketbal, nding wheel toys, etc. in lhe sotred area. llo wlrl(€Is durned to dean up lhe
balhrmm residue. On Monday, July 1 5, yr€ showd lhe regular palk mair enarlce wrker! lh6 tcrilet
area; they picked up most of the tolel lissue and a[ the empty ro s- They said lhal theyd look k o a
$€sh{own or cfiemical treatmer of lhe asphalt. We dont know whether either occured-
4:20 P.M. Amidst seve,al park visitors of various ages, a parlially loaded tlalbed truck wilh lrailer
drove onlo lhe asphalt play area. The driver began loadirg tof,ets on his truck and trailer. E(ttlteen
tdlets remained on lhe asphalt when the lruck drove away.
ln sum, we mainlain thatlhis small pa[k and neighborhood were impacted inappropriately by
such a large-scale everi. Atso, lhorough city oversight and supervision was hcking.
ln c-losing aBo\,y us to make these points:
. Anyone who lyas al Pershing Park tor a ped of lhe walk day, induding the par&npanB, m(rl have
come away with a more posilive but less complele assessmenl than ours_
. We conldbuted linancially lo this yeais lDay Walk al the request ot a respeded triend wio, as one
walker, was expected lo secure $1,900 in donations by June 14, 2002. Ho\ rever, h lhe friqrB as in
ttle past, we wil channel our donations lo breasl cancer research more diredly. As per lhs endosed
adicb from the S-F- Chronicle, 7.J &02, the organizers ot this walk r€ceived 40% of tunds rdsed.
. ln 1979 we purchased our Newlands Avenue home asoss frcm lyhat was the old Pershing School,
then housing Burftigame School Distri, Offces. We have lived here ever since. Ws and olher
neighborhood residents sal in meetirgs w'th dty offrjals lo plan logether yyhat un ld becorne
Pershing Park on the old school s e. From those meetings came the inlended usage of this smal
park il was to be aesthelically pleasing and des'rgned to encourago shti -tem usa by smd grouits
Gq! laBe galherings, leam practicB, etc.) Tber€fore, srrcll items as pubfc bathrooms, slreet Encing,
ard night lirl ing rere purposeftrly omitted from the conslructon of Pershing Park
We, our four children, and many othe6 in the community have appreciated and us€d this
pleasant lit0e pa* tor a number of years- Park maintenance and gardening personnd have
consistently kept Pershing Park a dean and beaulitul place.
It is our sincere requesl thal, from non, on, Burlingame decision makers will direc{ laBe
galhelings to large, supervised pa*s orjust say, 'No." Please do not mis-malch a huge qolvd lo a
small neighborhood park again. Please be more protedive. Thank ygg !
ryy*
(Mr. & Mrs.) Daniel R. March and Mary K. March
Enclosure
Burlingame City Council Members
James Nantell, Burlingame City Manager
Burlingame Parks and Recreation Commission Members
Randy Schwartz, Burlingame Parks and Recreation Direclor
cc
ln good faith,
ffi "*'/*;2tr2r, u*,*rm/a' at' -iliz'olzft/ru Fon aru{ //Pt {a/ /(a,r/41,
'frti, " Q'Z+/'/1fu-L,"furfr4,** q.r"A,
fo fix,0,6-rn P*,A-
A/t?r?- uaar'&r/ol *n-,
%/*zd%tfu.Q.,saoz.
Jfu4, ea*4 ;',t/*'taa' /*
#,u /rtb a/ f/z- 'auo/,'" ,?'%;#ffiT
aMr.o,7bt la iut&&h",.
)^'t/ra' /ffi- ah*Z
-/*"r-* ,7 ya,r/ 1,4of1, 44b"h4^/-;-E*r2p<*,{b, W--, /a- /d/,ifr-i-/.xu,uv /*y%7^.
July 4,2OO2
Dear Pershing Park Residents:
ln July of last year over 3,000 people walked from San Jose to San
Francisco to ralse $5 million dollars in the fight against bleast cancer. The
Bay Areais second Avon Breast Cancer 3-Day was such a huge success we
are looking forward to an even more exciting event this yearl
Our ability to use Pershing Park as a pit stop for our walkers was crucial to
the success of our event last year, and will be again this year. We
appreciate your continued support as residents in the neighborhood.
The date we will be using Pershing Park is Saturday, July 13th, 2OO2. We
will occupy the space for approximately six hours on that day, from 6:30am
to l:0opm. During the time frame of Bam-Noon, approximately 40OO
participants will walk through Pershing Park. We will utilize parking area
"H" lor our vehicles, in order to minimize on-street parking.
We will be posting signage along the route for the Walkers to be guided
through Pershing Park. Our crew will place the signage on Saturday
morning and take it down that afternoon. We will make sure that Pershing
Park is left as clean or cleaner than before the Walkers came through.
The Avon Breast Cancer 3-Day looks forward to coming through your area!
Thank you again for your continued support.
The Staff of the San Francisco Avon Breast Cancer 3-Day
,f i; ?tl,flzg a(a, ?kD, Ca,fr*fui,i' a*arao = /o//a#a, -fza/,r,/n&2-
/ -.,=:.:.'::^."j ,r*rrtediacenterDrive I Los&rgetes I califomia I 9006!1700 I (800)82tl0m
n
a
Atz I
az"/ ilL nAr, e
i 4,400"omptetetrek
)
, Slttl FRAilCISCO
rorand ]80mor
Thc
$sociakd in
/ZLE
JZz-
atil.2/e Cb/4hd4rt.
tL7 Eillim to pul on the Bay
'elter
and
mllc
carlier
AIDS
oI thc
luly 24,2002
Mr. James Nantell, City Manager
'Ihe City of Burlingame
City Hall - 501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Jirq
Thank you so much forthe City ofBurlingame's generous contribution of $1,000 to Broadway
By the Bay. Without your support we could not continue to provide affordable, professional-
quality musical theatre productions and training to the Peninsula community.
In return for your tax-deductible contribution, The City of Burlingame will be listed in Broadway
By the Bay's show programs (attendance of 40,000) and recognized in our newsletter
(circulation of 35,000).
For your records, Broadway By the Bay is a 501(c)3 non-profit; our ta>( id number is 94-
2674862. Once again, thank you for your generosity.
Sincerely,
Rosemary Hood
Executive Direcor
cc: Rahn Becker
PMUwnUrt06ov
Ps l-br= + u 'rc-- (*^j
.c- Sa>-u-_ /Tt,s A'n
428 Peninsula Avenue . San Mateo CA94401-1653 . Phone:57g-5568 . Fax:(650)579-56g0
E-Mail: info@bbbay.org (Business 0ffice) . Website:www.broadwaybythebay.org
a non-profit benefit corporation
LECALALD SOCLET
an Mateo CountY
521 East Sth Ave. San lVateo o California '94402
(650) 558-09i 5 PHotIE (650) 558-0673 '^x
)uly 24,2002
Mayor Mary JanneY
Vice Mayor Mike CoffeY
Councilmember CathY BaYlock
Councilmember Joe Galligan
Councilmember Rosalie O'MahoneY
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
o fs
RECEIVED
,UL 3 2002
CITY
ClTY
CLERK'S OFFICE
OF BURLINGAME
please resPond
Tha For
Dear Mayor Janney, Vice Mayor Coffey and Councilmembers:
Thank you so much for the City of Burlingame's most generous grant of
$2500. With the generous suppoft of the City of Burlingame, Legal Aid is
able to provide free civil legal services to low-income children, families and
seniors in Burlingame who have nowhere else to turn for legal advice,
education and representation in the areas of domestic violence, housing
and health law.
The Cifi's suppoft is especially meaningful in these difficult times.
Thanks in part to the City of Burlingame, Legal Aid stands by low-income
workers who have lost a job, providing advice about unemployment
insurance and access to health insurance benefits for families. Legal Aid
also counsels low-income individuals through our FIRSTSTOP program, so
that men and women can create their own microenterprise and a
sustainable source of income.
Thank you again.
DrsrnrnurloN:
N
Sincerely, ,
1,r,,7%
M. Stacey Hawvbr
Executive Director
,16
ttciry
Council
Manager
ll City Attomey
i-l Dir. Finance
[] City Planner
rl Dir. Public Works
i-l Human Resources
I Police Chief
U Fire Chief
I Parks & Rec
'r Librarian
r No Response Required
On Next Agenda
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF
YOUR RESPONSE TO THE
CITY CLERK
Board 6f :pjpctcirs
President
.lean Savaree
Vice-Ptesident
Lynne Esselstein
Treasurer
loe Gall$an,'elP,A.
Secretary
Gslnar Yazdi
lessica Arner
Mark Boessenecker
Marisa Bracoloni
Michael Charlson
Antony Chiang
Scott Devereaux
lanetr,e Leonirjou
Mark Molumphy
William L. Nagle
Gayle Prytz
Dan K. Siegel
Helen Tieh
Leticia Toledo
Rand N. White
David C. Wilson
General Counsel
Litigation Director
Peter H. Reid
Executive Director
M, Stacey HawYei- "
Past Presidents
lessica Arner
William Bissell
Paul Constantino
John Cosgrove
lames Dennis
Don Dowling
Robert DuRard
Hon. Walter Harrington
AIbeft Horn
Norrnan Kauanaugh
lanette Leonidou
Robert Nebrig
Jose Razo
Charles M" Riffle
'larlz Dahartcnn
Marvin Siegel
Hon. Thomas M. Srnith
KristiCotton Spence
Leon Strauss
Leticia Toledo
I Anthony Villanueva
Landis Weaver
Rand White
Timothy Wright