HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.10.07BI]RLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rncur,an Mrntnvc - MoNol,Y, OctonEn 7, 2002
Plce I or2
* CLOSED SESSION:
a. Threatened Litigation (Govemment Code $54956.9OX1)' (3XC)
Claim of John Taylor
Claim of Estelle SotomaYor
Claim of Raul Nicho
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular meeting of Septernber 16,2002
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speake* to three minutes each
a. Spending Plan for the2002 Local Law Enforcernent Block Grant
(LLEBG)
b. Resolution Adopting Revised Fees for Building Division
c. Adoption of Fees charged by the Fire Department in connection
with Permits and Inspections
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from
acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer
such matters to staff for investigation and./or action. Speakers are requested to fill out
a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The
Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Introduce an Ordinance to Amend Section I3.24.0I5 to Reduce
Speed Limit on Occidental Avenue between Barroilhet Avenue
and El Camino Real to Twenty-Five Miles Per Hour
b. Report on City Role in Mills-Peninsula Hospital Replacernent
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Resolution Authorizing Transfer ofFunds fot 2001-02Budget
b. Resolution Authorizing Loan to Sewer Fund
c. Approve Annual Report of the District; Adopt Resolution of
Intention to continue San Mateo County Tourism Business
lmprovement District, to Establish the basis for and to Levy the
Assessments for the District for the Year 2003, and to set Dates
for Public Hearings on the District and the Proposed Assessments
d. Resolution Accepting Califomia Drive Resurfacing Project
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94O1 O
(650) 558-7200
SAGGESTED ACTION
6:30 p.m. Conference Room A
7:00 p.m., Council Chambers
Approval
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Hearing/Action
Introduce
Discussion
Approval
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Rncur,AR MrBrrNc - MoNonv, Octontrn 7, 2002
PecB 2 on 2
e. Approve Revision to Planning Commission Rules of Procedure
f. Set October 29,2002 Special Study Session with San Mateo
County Transportation AuthoritY
g. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with San Mateo County to
Administer the Rehabilitation Loan Program for Burlingame as a
part of the Community Development Block Grant Program
h. Update on Financial Information Privacy Ordinances
i. Adopt a Resolution Supporting Measure C
j. Warrants & Payroll, August,2002
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, September 5,2002; Traffic,
Safety & Parking, Septernber 12,2002; Parks & Recreation,
September 19,2002; Planning, September 23, 2002
b. Department Reports: Building, September,2}0z; Police, August,
2002
c. Report on PG&E Bankruptcy: Proposal for New Franchise
Agreement with CitY
d. Letter from RCN concerning construction progress
e. Memorandum from City Planner concerning Withdrawal of
Appeal at826 Alpine Road
13. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 558-
7203 at least 24 hours betbre the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the
City Clerk's office, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the
meeting. Visit the City's website at rvuw.burlingante.ore,. Agendas and minutes are available at this
site.
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401 O
(650) 558-7200
Accept Report
NEXT MEETING- October 21 2002
Council Present:
Council Absent:
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Septembet 16,2002
1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council
Chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:00 p.m.by Mayor Mary Janney.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEG TO FLAG
Led by Tony DeAngeles.
3. ROLL CALL
Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony
None
4. MINUTES
Councilwoman Baylock noted a correction under "New Business"; minutes should read "Councilwoman
Baylock suggestedthe Council hold a public meeting to discuss the City of Burlingame being the lead
ug"rr.y for tfrl hospital EIR". Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the
Siptember 3,200i; seconded by Councilman Galligan; approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
L. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DETERMINATION THAT A SECOND UNIT
WAS BUILT BEFORE 1954 AT 826 ALPINE AVENUE. ZONED R.l
Cp Monroe referred to her staffreport dated Septernber 16,2002 recommending council holding a public
hearing to determine whether the second unit built at the rear of 826 Alpine Avenue was built before 1954
and is eligible for inclusion in the second unit amnesty program.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. David Mani, owner of 826 Alpine Avenue, Tony DeAngeles, 824
Alpine Avenue, and LeigtrTanton, 845 Linden Avenue, spoke in favor of the unit being included in the
second unit amnesty program. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed.
Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the appeal that the
unit located at 826 Alpine Avenue be included in the second unit housing stock; noted there was not enough
proof to determine its existence prior to January l,1954; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved
by voice vote,3-2,with Councilman Galligan and Councilwoman Baylock dissenting.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
I September 16,2002
b. ADOPT AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO GO CODE 36937 FOR
NO PARI(NG ZONES ON CARMELITA AVENUE FROM CALIFORNIA DRIVE TO EL
CAMINO REAL AND FOR ONE HOUR PARKING ZONES ON PRIMROSE ROAD FROM
BELLEVUE TO AVENUE
DPW Bagdon recommended Council adopt an urgency ordinance designating'No Parking During Specified
Hours" (7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.on any day except Sundays and holidays) on the south side and
north side of Carmelita Avenue from California Drive to El Camino Real, and designating One-Hour Parking
on Primrose Road from Floribunda Avenue to Bellevue Avenue.
Mayor Janney opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was
closed.
Mayor Janney requested CC Musso read the summary of the proposed urgency ordinance. Councilman
Galligan made a motion to waive further reading of the ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to adopt the urgency ordinance designating "No Parking During
Specified Hours" (7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. on any day except Sundays and holidays) on the
south side and north side of Carmelita Avenue from California Drive to El Camino Real, and designating
One-Hour Parking on Primrose Road from Floribunda Avenue to Bellevue Avenue; seconded by
Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor Janney requested CC Musso publish a summary of the proposed urgency ordinance within l5 days of
proposed adoption.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Charles Yoltz,T25YemonWay, Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater, and Ed Larios, 1536 Barroilhet, spoke in
support of the leasing of property at783 California Drive as a temporary teen facility. Mimi Hahn, 719
Burlingame Avenue, spoke on behalf of the American Cancer Society and "Relay for Life" being held on
October 5,2002.
COMMISSIONER TERM EXPIRATIONS: BEAUTIFICATION (2). CIVIL SERVICE (2).
TRAFFIC. SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION (2)
CM Nantell recommended Council consider reappointing incumbent commissioners, appoint candidates
from two year list or use the current Council policy as reflected in the 1994 Council Resolution2l-94 and
establish a filing deadline of Tuesday, October 15,2002, for accepting commissioner applications and select
a Council interview team for eventual interviews.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
a.
2
September 16,2002
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Janney noted she would like to open up the application process in accordance with Resolution #21-
94. The following interview teams were established: Councilwoman Baylock & O'Mahony, Beautification
Commission; Councilman Galligan and Councilwoman O'Mahony, Parks & Recreation; Traffic, Safety &
Parking, Mayor Janney and Vice Mayor Coffey; Civil Service, Councilman Galligan and Vice Mayor
Coffey.
b. TEMPORARY TEEN FACILITY
Dp&R Schwartz recommended Council give direction on whether or not staff and the Parks & Recreation
Commission should continue pursing a location to be used as a temporary teen center and if so, how should
such a center be funded. Noted that the property located at 783 California Drive was identified by the
Commissioners as meeting the general criteria established for a temporary teen center. The 6,000+ square
foot site has enough program space for a wide variety of teen activities, including basketball, game tables,
homework/computer rooms and hang-out areas. DP&R explained to Council what the cost to lease the
property would be and various ways the money could be raised to help pay for the facility.
Council directed DP&R Schwartz to proceed on pursuing a location for a temporary teen center, particularly
the vacant building at783 California Drive.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
^. SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT/STRE,ET CLOSURE _ HALLOWEEN SAFE STREET
(PRIMROSE ROAD)
EA Weber recommended Council authorize the closure of Primrose Road between Burlingame Avenue and
Donnelly Avenue as the site for the community Halloween Safe Street Program being held on Thursday,
October 31,2002.
b.RE,SOLUTION #102.2002 AUTHORIZING AGRE,EMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN
MATEO AND THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
SERVICES O CITY OF SAN MATEO VEHICLES
Fire Chief Reilly recommended Council approve Resolution #102-2002 an agreement between the City of
San Mateo and the City of Burlingame to have San Mateo Fire Department vehicles serviced by the City of
Burlingame.
RE,SOLUTION #IO3.2OO2 AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTc.
WITH THE CUL VER GROUP FOR ENG ERING DESIGN SERVICES F'OR WATER
MAIN WITH THE BURLIN GAME. EASTON NO. 5 AND EASTON NO. 7
SUBDIVISIONS
DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution #103-2002 authorizing a professional services
agreement with the Culver Group in the amount of $509,265.
Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Coffey,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
J September 16,2002
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City.
10. OLD BUSINESS
Vice Mayor Coffey inquired as to the status of the "Opt-in, Opt-out Privacy Bi11". CA Anderson noted a
staff report would be brought to Council at the next meeting regarding this subject.
Councilwoman Baylock reminded the public that the Council will be discussing the subject of the hospital
EIR at the regular meeting of October 7,2002.
11. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Planning, September 9,2002
b. Department Reports: Building, August, 2002; Finance, August 2002
c. Letter from Louisa Lloyd Shields, 1205 Drake Avenue and reply from City Planner Monroe concerning
Broadway Business Area
13. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION
At 9:40 p.m., Council adjoumed to closed session.
City Attorney Anderson reported Council directed him regarding the following items discussed during the
closed session:
a.Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code $ 54956.8: Property:
Assessor Parcel No. 029-053-430,783 Califomia Drive; Agency Negotiators: Randy Schwartz, Larry
Anderson, Jim Nantell; Negotiating Parties: Proffitt Trust (Terry Horn); Under Negotiation: Lease of
Property
b. Threatened Litigation (Govemment Code $ 54956.90)(2) and (3XC) Claim of Michael Svanevik
(copyright use)
c. Pending Litigation (Government Code $ 5a956.9(a))
d. Louis Marini vs. City of Burlingame (ABAG Plan), San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 419382
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes4
September 16,2002
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Janney adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. in memory of Timothy Mclinden, son of Rich and Mary
Mclinden; she also acknowledged the recent marriage of Lee Thompson, the cable cameftlman.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann T. Musso
City Clerk
Burlingame City Council
Unapproved Minutes
5 September 16,2002
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AI\iD CITY COUNCIL
DArE: 20 Sep 02
FRoM: GarT Missel, Chief of Police
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE toll lo2
5a
BY
BY
APPRO\rEI)
sIIBrEcr: Spending Plan for the 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG)
RECOMMEIYDATION: The City Council should hold a public hearing to consider Chief Missel's
spending plan for 2002LLEBG funds. After the public hearing the Council should vote approval of the
plan to spend funds for computer equipment and/or software.
BACKGROIIhID: The U.S. Department of Justice has ewarded Burlingame a $16,640 LL.EBG for2O02.
Federal law requires that the chief of police develop a plan to spend LLBBG funds. That plan must be
neviewed and approved at two public hearings. Chief Missel's plen was lirst approved on24 July 02 by
the San Mateo County 2002 LLEBG Advisory Board at a public hearing in Redwood City (see attached
email memo frcm M. Mojas). The City Council must approve the plan after a public heering before the
funds can be spent Grant funds will be used to purchase computer hardware end/or software" The
matching funds required by this grant ($fE49) will be drawn from the operating budget of the police
department.
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Award Conlimetion from the U.S. Department of Justice
Missel, Gary
To
pm
int:
bject:
M ichelle Mojas [mmojas@co.sanmateo.ca. us]
Wednesday, July 24,200211:49 AM
ktreadway@ci.millbrae,ca.us; wsouth@ci.millbrae.ca.us; saundersj@ci.pacifica.ca.us;
jim.granucci@ci.san-carlos.ca. us; steve.jackson@ci.san-carlos.ca.us;
lviolett@ci.sanbruno.ca.us; wbowling@cityofepa.com; dscanlan@cityofsanmateo.org;
jdalton@cityofsanmateo.org; gmclane@dalycity.org; jwarren@dalycity.org;
cwboyd@menlopark.org; JHSimpson@menlopark.org; missel@police.ci.burlingame.ca,us;
cbolanos@redwoodcity.org; ccesena@redwoodcity.org; EHernandez@redwoodcity.org;
mike.guglielmon i@ssf. net
Bill Pedrini; Don Horsley; Don O'Keefe; Greg Munks
LLEBG Advisory Board Meeting
Cc
Su
At today's Advisory Board Hearing, the Board unanimously approved each
Pol-ice Departmentrs spending plan for year 2002 Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant (LLEBG).
Vote:
5 Ayes, 0 Nays
P.l-ease keep record of the hearing in your grant fil-e for futurereference. Department's were provided an j-nformation packet at thehearing to keep as a form of record,/documentation of the mandatory
Advisory Board Hearing.
Also be sure to send a copy of your grant appli-cation/award to your
State Agency Point of Contact (SPOC/SAA) as follows:
f,fice of Crj-mj-nal ,fustice Planningtittn: Biran Keith
1130 K Street, Suite LL60
Sacramento, CA 95814
Grants Coordination, State Clearinghouse
Office of P1anning & Research
P.O. Box 3044, Room 222
Sacramento, CA 9581-2
Michelle Mojas
Grant Admini-strator
County of San Mateo Sheriffrs Office(6s0) 363-1974
1
Hopefully next year we'l-l- meet again, that is, if the FEDS al-Iow us theopportunity to appfy for more LLEBG fundi-ng. We'11- have to wait for thefinal- budget and the impact of Homeland Security on LLEBG, Byrne, COPS
MORE and SCAAP funds.
Accept Award Confi rmation
FY 2002 Local Law Enfarcement Block Grants Program
Burlingame City, CA
Application Award RFD Grant Changes Reports Correspondence
Award Handbook Accept Award Confirmation
Page I of I
Congratulations!You have accepted your jurisdiction's FY 2002 LLEBG Award and
its conesponding specia! conditions.Overview
Review CEO
Information
Acce.pt Award
View AwardDocument
Financial Institution
lnforrnation
DeclineAward
HelplFrequently Asked
Ouestions
r'Y 2OO2 LLEBG FinalArvad Amount:
Matching Amount:
LLEBG Awad Number
LLEBG Awad Date:
$ 16,640.00
$ 1,849.00
2002-LB-BX-2361
g2-AUG-02
x LLEBGHome
Log-Off
Remember, acceptance of this Award and special conditions DOES NOT result in an
automatic payment of LLEBG funds. You must submit the RFD in order to receive
funds, and you must submit it within 90 calendar days from the award date. You may
begin the RFD process now by clicking on the RFD Tab above-
Click here to view and print your official FY 2002 LLEBG Awad documents and
special conditions.
Switch to ...
https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov:8004/gms_user/plsqVaward.accept_award_confirmation 8/L2l2AA2
)
)
ffi
I
5b
MTG.
OATE
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
September 17,2002 BY
APPROVED
RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED FEES FOR BUILD]NG DIV
RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution adopting revised fees
for the Building Division.
BACKGROUND: The Public Works Building Division provides various services to people and organizations to
assure that new building construction complies with the California State Building Codes, local ordinances and
conditions of approval. It also functions as a one-stop permit center, collecting fees for other City departments. In
general, the division should be a self-supporting entity, with fees collected in an amount sufficient to pay for its
operations; however, as fees have not been increased since 1996, the division's operations have been partially
subsidized by the General Fund.
DISCUSSION: The proposed fees were developed by determining the labor and materials associated with issuing
permits, reviewing plans and inspecting construction for building projects, including overhead and interdepartmental
costs. As indicated in an attachment, these fees are in line with the average of four neighboring jurisdictions.
Overall, fees would increase by about 25%; and some fees, such as application, mechanical and imaging, are
simplified for ease of use. The Planning Department plan review fee for projects valued at more than $10,000 would
be changed from 1% of vahtation to l5Vo of the building permit fee to be consistent with other fees collected by the
division. A new fee is proposed to reimburse the Public Works Engineering Division for time expended in review
of plans for compliance with standards and conditions of approval. This is set at 25% of the building permit fee.
EXHIBITS: Resolution; Fee Comparison; Fee Schedule
BUDGET IMPACT: Assuming construction continues at approximately the current level, it is estimated that
Building Division revenues would increase by approximately $165,000 per year. These revenues are subject to
fluctuations in construction but are reasonably conservative given the historic stability of construction in Burlingame.
650-558-7230
c:City Clerk, Chief Building Official
STAFF REPORT AGENDA
ITEM #
10t7 to2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC WORKS BY
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Building Fees.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING INCREASES IN THE FEES CHARGED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION IN
CONNECTION WITH PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS
WHEREAS, the City has not changed or increased its fees for the issuance of construction
permits or the inspections conducted by the Building Division since 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Building Division has studied its current fee structure, its current operating
costs, and the fees charged by nearby agencies; and
WHEREAS, any subsidy to the costs of providing the City's permitting and inspection
services to those who develop and improve real property should be minimized; and
WHEREAS, notice ofthe proposed increases in fees and the hearing on them has been given
as required by Government Code section 66016, and a notice has also been published in a newspaper
of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing on October 7, 2002, and considered all
comments regarding the proposed increases; and
WHEREAS, the proposed increases are fair and equitable, based on actual delivery costs,
and consistent with the fees already being charged in other cities on the Peninsula,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The fee schedule, containing Building Permit Fees, Plumbing Permit Fees, Mechanical
Permit Fees, and Electrical Permits Fees, as contained in Exhibit A is approved. Pursuant to
Government Code section 66017, these fees shall be effective on December 7 ,2002.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certift that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COLINCILMEMBERS:
COI.]NCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
C :\F ILE S\RE S O\b ld gfees. bld. wpd
City Clerk
PERMIT FEE COMPARISONS
Example:31000 Square Foot, single family house
13 Plumbing Fixtures, Gas Outlets, Water Heater
150 Amp Service
2- 100,00M8TU FAUs,3 Exhaust Fans
Valuation: $350,000
Burlingame:CURRENT
Building Permit
Plan Check
Enerry P.C.
Total Building
$2,393.75
I,555.93
s98.43
PROPOSED
s2,993.25
1,945.61
748.31
$4,548.11 s5,687.17
Mechanical Permit & P.C.93.s6 225.00
Electrical Permit & P.C.277.50 300.00
Plumbing Permit & P.C.2rr.68 300.00
TOTAL ALL PERMIT FEES $5,130.85 $6,572.17 (+28%)
OTHER CITIES COMPARISONS
Palo Alto:$5,347.13
San Mateo:$5,667.66
Belmont:$9,432.00
Redwood City:$s.47r.37
Average of Four Cities:$6,685.51
MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Imaging fees for Burlingame run about $125.00 for a new house: Palo Alto would be $270.00;
San Mateo, Redwood City and Belmont would be $109, $107.00 and $181.50 respectively.
FEE B/C B.TP P.A.S.Mateo RWC Belmont
Hourly Chg.$s0.00 $7s.00 $60.00 $7s.73 $4s.00 $120.00
Imaging $1/Sht 5%BP $2/Sh+$ZO 5%BP 5%BP s%BP
CITY OF BURLINGAME
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION FEE
$1.00 to $500.00 $30.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $30.00 for the first $500.00 plus $3.80 for each additional $100.00, or
fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $87.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $17.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00
$25,00 1.00 to $50,000.00 $489.50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $12.65 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $l 00,000.00 $805.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $8.75 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00
$ I 0 1,000.00 to $500,000.00 $1,243.25 for the first $100,000.00 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00
$501,000.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4043.25 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.95 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,000 and up $7,018.25 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $4.60 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
l. Inspections outside of normal business hours............ .....$75.00 per hour
(Minimum charge - four hours)
(Minimum - one hour)
Plan Review Fees:
l. Basic Fee............... .......65% of Building permit Fee
2.Energy Plan Check Fee (Where Applicable)....Additional 25% of Building Permit Fee
3. Disabled Access Plan Check Fee (Where Applicable)...................Additional 35% of Building Permit Fee
4. Planning Department Plan Check Fee (Where Applicable)............Additional l5%o of Building Permit Fee
(Minimum Fee of $75.00)
5. Plan Revisions for Planning Department (Where Applicable).. ................$75.00
6. Plan Revisions Subsequent to Permit Issuance....... ...$37.50 plus Cost of Additional Review
(Additional Review at $75.00 per hour, half hour minimum charge)
7. Engineering Division Plan Review (Where Applicable).................Additiona|25Yo of Building permit Fee
8. Imaging Fee............... ........Additional 5% of Building permit Fee
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance:
l. For the issuance of each plumbing permit........... .......$30.00
(Note: The following are in addition to the permit issuance fee)
New Residential Buildings
Fee including all plumbing fixtures, connections and gas outlets for new single- and multi-family buildings
1. Fixtures and Vents
For each plumbing fixture or trap (including water and waste piping and backflow prevention).......................$12.25
2. Sewers and Interceptors
For each industrial waste pretreatnent interceptor (except kitchen-type grease traps). .................$25.00
3. Water Piping and Water Heaters
For installation, alteration or repair of water piping or water-treatment equipment, each............ ....$6.00
4. Gas Piping Systems
For each gas piping system of one to five outlets... ...........$8.00
5. Irrigation Systems and Backllow Prevention Devices
Irrigation system including backflow prevention device(s)...... .............$18.50
Other backflow prevention devices"
6. Swimming Pools
For each swimming pool or spa, all plumbing:
7. Miscellaneous
For each appliance or fixture for which no fee is 1isted............ .............$12.25
Other Inspections and Fees
l. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour (minimum charge-four hours)........ .......$75.00
2. Reinspection fee assessed under provisions ofSection 305.8, per
inspection..... ....$75.00
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour (minimum charge-one-half hour)...................$75.00
4. Imaging fee................ .Additional 5% of plumbing permit fee
5. Plan review where plans are required.. ...............Additional25Yo of plumbing permit fee
Note:
These fees do not include connection fees, such as for sewer connections or water meter charged by other city
departments nor any fees charged by public utility companies.
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
For the issuance of each mechanical permit........... ..........$30.00
(Note: the following are in addition to the permit issuance fee)
New Residential Buildings
Fee including all mechanical work including appliances, exhaust fans, ducts and flues
Unit Fee Schedule:
1. Furnaces
To and including 100 MBTU,
each............. .$18.50
2. Boilers, Compressors, Absorption Systems
To and including 100 MBTU or 3 HP, each.............. .......$18.50
3. Air Conditioners
5. Air Handlers
To 10,000 CFM including ducting., each.............. ............$12.50
6. Ventilation and Exhaust
Each ventilation fan attached to a single duct.............. .......$9.00
7. Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment not specifically listed
above........... ...........$18.50
Other Inspections and Fees
l. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour (four hour minimum charge)..... ............$75.00
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8, per inspection................... .........$75.00
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour (one-half hour minimum charge)...................$75.00
4. Imaging fee....Additional 57o of mechanical permit fee
.Additional 25%o of mechanical permit fee5. Plan review where plans are required.
Note:
These fees do not include connection fees, such as for sewer connections or water meters charged by other city
departments nor any fees charged by public utility companies.
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
(Note: the followingfees are in addition to the permit issuance fee)
New Residential Buildings
The following fee includes all wiring and electrical devices in or on each building, including service(s)
System Fee Schedule
Swimming Pools
l. Public swimming pools and spas including all wiring and electrical equipment.... $75.00
Temporary Power
l. Temporary service pole including all attached receptacles, each.............. .............$30.00
2. Temporary power pole and wiring for construction sites, Christmas tree lots, etc, each....... ......$45.00
OR
Unit Fee Schedule
Receptacle, switch and light outlets
Residential Appliances
l. For fixed residential appliances including cooktops, ovens, air conditioning, garbage disposals and similar devices
not exceeding I HP (746 Watts) in rating, each.............. ...$6.00
(For other types of air conditioners or other motor-driven appliances having larger ratings, see Power Apparatus)
Nonresidential Appliances
l. Self-contained factory-wired non-residential appliances not exceeding I HP, KW or kVA in rating including
medical and dental devices; food, beverage and ice cream cabinets; illuminated showcases; drinking fountains;
vending machines; laundry machines, etc, each....... .........$6.00
(For other types of devices having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus/
Power Apparatus
For motors, generators, air conditioners and heat pumps and commercial cooking devices as follows:
Ratings in horsepower, kilowatts, kilovolt-amperes or kilovolt-amperes-reactive;
2. Over l0 to and including 100,
each............. ..................$35.00
3. Over 100, each..
Notes:
.$9s.00
1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined
ratings may be used.
2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other related control
equipment.
Busways
l. For trolley and plug-in type busways, each 100 feet (30,500mm) or fraction thereof.......... .....,..$9.00
Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees
1. Signs, outline lighting or marquees supplied from one circuit, each.............. .........$30.00
2. For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting or marquee, each.............. ...$6.00
Services
l. 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each.............. .$35.00
2. 600 volts or less, over 200 amperes to 1,000 amperes, each.............. ....................$80.00
3. Over 600 volts or over 1,000 amperes, each.......... .....$150.00
Miscellaneous
l. For apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is set forth.........$25.00
Other Inspections and Fees
l. Inspections outside of normal business hours (Four Hour Minimum)................. ...$75.00
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions the Administrative Code.......... ........$75.00
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour (one-half hour minimum).. .......$75.00
4. Imaging fee................ ...........Additional5o/o of total mechanical permit fee
5. Plan review fee where plans are required........ ..............Additional25oh of total mechanical permit fee
Note:
These fees do not include connection fees, such as for sewer connections or water meters charged by other city
departments nor any fees charged by public utility companies.
STAFF RE,PORT
ro: HONORABLE MAYO R AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: September 19,2002
FRoM: Fire Department
AGENDA 5cITEM #
MTG.
DATE LO|T lO2
STIBM
BY
APPROVED
BY
SUBJECT: Adoption of Fees charged by the Fire Department in con ons with Pcrmits and Inspections
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that tlre city council adopt by resolution increased and amended fees to be chargecl by the Fire
Department in connection with pennits and inspections.
BACKGROUND:
At present the, the fire departrnent does rrot charge fees for the various services proviclecl by the fire preve,tion bureau.
Recently the City of Burlingame adopted the non-building standards containecl in the 2000 Edition of the Uniforrn Fire
Code and the building standards contained in the 2001 Edition of the California Fire Cocle. Within these two
documents, the fire departlnent is authorized to issue pennits pertinent to specializecl hazardous uses and the irrstallationof fi re protection/suppression equipment within buildings.
The fire department inspects buildings and operations within the city of Burlingarne, whiclr, by the patlrre of their uses.presentahigherriskofincident. InspectionsarealsoconductedinbuildingsthathavebeeniJentifiecltohaveeconomic
significance, such that an incident in any of these structures could irnpact tile economic gror.vth of the cit1,. Additionally,
tlre fire department is charged with the ettforcement of state regulations within certain occupapcies desigiratecl as stateregulated facilities.
A survey of surrounding agencies shows that these recornmended fees are cornparable ancl a very reasonable way torecover costs based on a per hour charge for services provided. The other agerrcies use a per square foot and per urrit
charge which we do not feel is the most accurate way to calculate the fees.
The fees associated with these permits and inspections are intended to recover actual cost for plan review services,
inspection and administrative services. The rates were established by the actual hourly rates of the inclividualsperforming the various services.
EXHIBITS:
o Exhibit A - Master Fee Schedule for the Fire Department Inspectiorrs. New Copstructiorr. arrd Fire Code permitso Exhibit B - San Mateo County Fee Comparison Report
BUDGET IMPACT:
The new and increased fees should generate $75,000 to $l 00,000 annually
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING FEES CHARGED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN CONNECTION WITH PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS
WHEREAS, the City has not changed fees for the issuance of construction permits or the
inspections conducted by the Fire Department; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department has studied its operating costs, and the fees charged by
nearby agencies; and
WHEREAS, any subsidy to the costs of providing the City's permitting and inspection
services to those who develop and improve real property should be minimized; and
WHEREAS, notice ofthe proposed establishment of fees and the hearing on them has been
given as required by Govemment Code section 66016, and a notice has also been published in a
newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing on October 7, 2002, and considered all
comments regarding the proposed increases; and
WHEREAS, the proposed increases are fair and equitable, based on actual delivery costs,
and consistent with the fees already being charged in other cities on the Peninsula,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
l. The fee schedule, containing Fire Inspection Fees, Fire Construction Fees, and Fire permit
Fees, as contained in Exhibit A is approved. Pursuant to Government Code section 66017,these fees
shall be effective on January 2,2003.
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
C:\FILES\RESO\bldgfees.bld.wpd
City Clerk
CITY OF BURLINGAME
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
Calendar Year - 2003
I. INSPECTION FEES
BUSINESS LICENSE $ 42.75
CARE FACILITIES
Pre-inspection of any licensed community care facility
25 persons or less $ S0.OO
>25 persons $ 100.00
GENERAL INSPECTION
RE.INSPECTION FEE
Residential Care Facilities
housing more than 6 persons.
7-10 persons
more than 10 percons
Residential Gare Facilities
Group Care housing 6 or less persons
Large Family Day Gare
Hospita l/! nstitutions
RE.INSPECTIONS
Second and Subsequent re-inspections* lncludes on-site construction re-inspections*
UNDERGROUND TANK
Underground Tank Consultation
Inspection Cleanup
CHRISTMAS TREE LOTS
Christmas Tree Lots
$ 66.50 -.*
$ 11.25 pq*nshu.
$ 206.50
$ 272.00
$ 141.00
$ 108.25
$ 276.00
$ 66.50 -*.
$ 33.25 -"...
$ 33.25 *,.*.
$ 66.50
flrr,o,' ,4
CITY OF BURLINGAME
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
Calendar Year 2003
!II. NEW CONSTRUCTION FEES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE PLAN CHECK
Building or Planning Plan Check
SPECIALIZED PERMITS (includes inspections)
Fire Alarm Systems
Plan Check
Permit for monitoring systems
Permit for manual systems
Permit for automatic systems
Permit for combination systems
Fixed Extinguishing Systems
Plan Check
Permit
Standpipe Systems
Plan Check
Permit
Storage Tank (above or below)
Plan Check
Permit
High Pile Storage
Plan Check
Permit - 20,000 sqft or less
Permit - More than 20,000 sqft
$ 66.50 -.."
$ 76.s0.,"-.
$ 43.25
$ 43.2s
$ 209.50
$ 276.00
$ 76.s0 **,$ 143.00
$ 76.50 -".,$ 148.00
$ 76.50.."*
$ 76.50
$ 76.50 -*,$ 143.00
$ 276.00
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
One or Two Family Dwelling Fire Sprinkler System (NFPA 13D)
Plan Check S 26.50 **Permit $ 143.00
Fire Pumps
Plan Check $ 76.50 -*,Permit $ 7G.S0
Residential or Commercial Fire Sprinkler System (NFPA 13 or 13R)
Plan Check $ 76.50 *".-
Permit - Single Story (includes T.l.) $ 209.50Permit-Multi-Story $ 226.00
Plan Checks will be calculated in % hour increments.
fiit arr 4
CITY OF BURLINGAME
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
Calendar Year 2003
$ 85.76/hrFire Marshal
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire Captain
Shift lnspector
Administration
$ 66.50/hr
$ 70.50/hr
$ 65.50/hr
$ 40.00/hr
HOURLY RATES
dV,err y'
Fire Code Permits
oo
(Et
o
E
tr
o
o
tro
ooo.o
o
E
tr
oo
o
o
.u
(!
.9,
'E
!,
Total
Aerosol Products 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
Apartments & Hotels and l\Iotels,10 or less units 70.50 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.25 80.50
Apartments & Hotels and lMotels,11 to 25 units 70.50 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.25 98.1 3
Apartments & Hotels and ltlotels, 26 or greater units 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 133.38
Asbestos removal 66.50 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 59.88
Automobile wrecking yard 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 133.38
Battery system 66.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 126.38
Carnivals and fairs 65.53 0.25 2.00 1.00 0.25 222.97
Combustible fiber storage 70.50 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.25 98.1 3
Combustible material storage 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 133.38
Compressed gases 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
Commercial rubbish-handling operation 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 133.38
Cryogens 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
Dry cleaning plants 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 133.38
Dust-prod ucing operations 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
Explosives or blasting agents 66.50 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.25 159.63
Fire hydrants and water-control valves 66.50 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.25 76.50
Fireworks 66.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 126.38
Flammable or combustible liquids 65.53 0.25 3.00 0.50 0.25 255.74
Hazardous materials 65.53 0.25 4.00 1.00 0.25 354.03
High-piled combustible storage. 20,000 sqft or less 66.50 0.25 2.00 0.25 0.25 176.25
High-piled combustible storage. [t/ore than 20,000 sqft 66.50 0.25 400 0.50 0.25 325.88
Hot-work operations 66.50 0.25 1.00 050 0.25 126.38
Liquefied petroleum gases 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
Liquid- or gas-fueld vehicles or equipment in assembly buildinqs 65.53 0.25 100 0.50 0.25 124.68
Live Audiences 66.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 126.38
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Lumber yards To store in excess of 100,000 board feet.65.53 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.25 190.21
IU nesium worki 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 108.30
Mall, covered. Dis booths 1.00 0.25 0.25 108.30
tMall covered For assemb 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 108.30
ItIall covered With o -flame 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 108.30
lVlall, covered. D fuel red ut ment 65.53 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 108.30
Motor vehicle fuel-d si stations 190.21
burni 0.25 75.53
anic coati 124.68
Ovens, industrial bakin and d n 108.30
Parade floats 66.50 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 109.75
Places of assemb 3.00 239.36
Production facilities 65.53 0.25 2.00 222.97
nical and al effects material 66.50 0.25 2.00 192.88
Radioactive materials 65.53 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.25 91.91
n ui ment 0.25 2.00 0.50 0.25 192.88
air Ga 0.25 0.50 0.25 124.68
n and 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 124.68
ents, cano ies and membrane structures 66.50 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.25 126.38
Tire stora e 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.2s 0.25 115.75
Wood ucts 70.50 0.25 1.00 0.25 0.25 115.75
65.531 0.251
6s 531 o 25l 2 0ol o 50l 0.251
65.531 o.5ol o 25l 0 251
65.531 o 25l l ool 0.501 0.251
65 531 0.251 1.ool 0 251 0 2sl
65.531 0.251 0.251 0.251
l ool o 25l
0.501 0 251
66.501
65.531 l ool
65 531
FEE COMPARISON MATRIX
SERVICE Burlingame San Mateo Millbrae Hillsborough
General Inspections $66.50/hr $l l8/hr $56.004r $7s.00
Re-inspections (including construction)$66.50/hr Sl l8/hr $60.00/hr $l3s-t8s
New Business Licenses $42.75 each $l12.00/hr N/A N/A
Care Facilities - Pre-lnsp. 25 persons or less $s0.00 N/A N/A ss0.00
Care Facilities - Pre-lnsp. >25 persons $ 100.00 N/A N/A $50.00
Residential Care 7 -10 persons s206.s0 Sl l8/hr N/A $0. l0/sqft
Residential Care +10 persons $272.00 $ I l8,trr N/A $0. I O/sqft
Group Care 6 or less persons $141.00 $l18,4u N/A S0. I Oisqft
Large Family Day Care sl08.2s Sl l8/hr $l10.00 $0. l0/sqft
HospitaVlnstitutions $276.00 $l l8/hr N/A N/A
Underground Tank Inspections 533.251.25 br s 123 .00 N/A $65.00/hr
Christmas Tree Lots $66.s0 s60.00 $210.00
General Plan Check $66.50/hr $l12.00/hr $0.21lsqft $65.00/hr
Fire Alarm Systems $ 177.00
- Plan Check $76.50/hr s 194.00 $0.07lsqft
- Permit for monitoring systems $43.2s $0.07lsqft s 175.00
- Permit for manual systems $43.25 S0.07lsqft $ 17s.00
- Permit for automatic systems $209.50 $0.07lsqft $ 17s.00
- Permit for combination systems s276.00 $0.07lsqft s 17s.00
Fixed Extinguishing Systems $50.00 N/A
- Plan Check S76.5O/hr $194.00
- Permit s143.00 $118.00
Standpipe Systems 75% Bld. Prt N/A
- Plan Check S76.50/hr s 194.00
- Permit $ 148.00 $0.08/sqft
Storage Tanks $ r 89.00 s2r0 $6s
- Plan Check $76.50/hr
- Permit s76.60
Hieh Pile Storase s128.00 $2r0 N/A
- Plan Check $76.5O/hr
- Permit - 20,000 sqft or less s143.00
- Permit - More than 20,000 sqft s276.00
Sprinkler Systems 75%Bld.Prt
- Plan Check $76.5O/hr $194.00 W/Permit
I & 2 Familv Dwelling Permit $ 143.00 $l18.00 $0.07lsqft
Residential or Commercial Permit - Single Story s209.s0 $0.08/sqft $0.07/sqft
Residential or Commercial Permit - Multi Story s276.00 S0.08/sqft $0.07/sqft
Fire Pump Permit $76.s0 N/A
UFC PERMITS
Apartments/Hotels/Motels, 10 or less units s80.s0 $ 100,$ 10.15/unit $ I I .O0/unit N/A
Apartments/Hotels/Motels, l1 to 25 units s98. l3 $ 100,$ 10.15/unit $l 1.00/unit N/A
Apartments/Hotels/Motels/26 or greater units $ 133.38 $ I 00,$ 10. I 5/unit Sl 1.00/unit N/A
Carnivals & Fairs s222.97 $l12.00/booth N/A s 150.00
Fire Hydrants & Water Control Valves $76.s0 $ I 18.00/hr N/A $75.00
Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Stations $ 190.21 $ 123.00 N/A N/A
Places of Assembly $239.36 $ 123.00 $205.00 $300.00
fivrltdtt I
AGENDA
7a
10t7 to2
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BYSeptembet 24,2OO2
APPROVED
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 1 15 TO REDUCE SPEED LIMIT
ON OCCIDENTAL AVENUE BETWEEN BARROILHET AVENUE AND EL CAMINO REAL
TO TWENTY-FIYE MILES PER HOUR
RECOMMENDATION: lntroduce an ordinance to amend Section 13.24.015 to reduce the speed limit on
Occidental Avenue by:
Requesting the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
Waiving further reading of the proposed ordinance.
Introducing the proposed ordinance.
Directing the Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before its
proposed adoption.
BACKGROUND: The City received the attached letter by a resident of Occidental Avenue requesting action be
takento reduce the vehicle speeds on Occidental Avenue. The item was agendized for discussion at three Traffic
Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) meetings. During those discussions, staff conducted studies and
evaluated various options to address the vehicles speeding.
The primary concerns were high vehicle speeds on Occidental Avenue and sight-visibility at the intersection of
Occidental Avenue and Chapin Avenue which posed a potential hazardto her family and pets. The resident also
expressed a concern over the noise of accelerating cars on Occidental Avenue.
DISCUSSION: To address these concerns, a stop sign warrant study and two new speed studies were conducted.
The results ofthe stop sign study demonstrated that stop signs were not warranted at the intersection of Occidental
Avenue and Chapin Avenue based on volume and accident history.
Two studies (done two months apart) determined that the critical speed is 32 mph on Occidental Avenue.
Although the studies did not support a change in the current posted speed limit of 30 mph, staffrecommended to
the TSPC that Occidental Avenue be posted for a 25-mph speed limit due to:
Reduced driving lane widths caused by a narrow street and permitted on-street parking.
Impaired sight-distance at certain intersections.
Numerous driveway access points.
The TSPC concurred with the staffrecommendation at their September 12,2002 meeting.
In order to make the reduction in the speed limit effective, the Police and Engineering staff is requesting an
ordinance amendment to delete Occidental Avenue from the list of streets in Chapter 13.24.015 for a speed limit
of 30 mph as follows:
STAFF REPORT #ITEM
MTG.
DATE
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC WORKS BY
1.
2.
J.
4.
a
a
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Occidental Speed Limit.wpd
Staff Report
September 24,2002
Page 2
"Chapter 13.24.015 - Thirty miles per hour:
No person shall drive a vehicle upon any of the following designated streets at a speed greater than thirty
miles per hour:
* (a) Peninsula Avenue between El Camino Real and Califomia Drive;1 (b) Hillside Drive between Alvarado Avenue and El Camino Real.
The Director of Public Works is authorized and directed to procure appropriate signs giving notice of said
prima facie speed limits, and to erect the same upon the above designated streets."
Police officers will start to enforce the new 25 mph speed limit 30 days after adoption of the ordinance
amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: Funding is available in the Street Maintenance budget for re-signing Occidental Avenue.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance
Resident Letter
TSPC Minutes - September 12,2002
Traffic Engineer
(6s0) ss8-7230
City Clerk
Police Department
TSP Commission
cc
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Occidental Speed Limit.wpd
ORDINANCE No.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING SECTION 13.24.015 TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON
OCCIDENTAL AVENUE BETWEEN BARROILHET AVENUE AND EL CAMINO
REAL TO TWENTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR
The CITY COTINCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Currently, Occidental Avenue between Barroilhet Avenue and El Camino Real
is legislated at a 30 mile per hour speed. Residents of the Occidental Avenue neighborhood have
requested the City to reduce the speed limit. Following a study by the Public Works Department
that found that a speed reduction was justified by the nature of the roadway, accident history, and
uses in the neighborhood, such as schools and churches, the Transportation, Safety & Parking
Commission recommended that the speed limit be reduced to 25 miles per hour. This reduction
appears justified and should be implemented.
Section 2. Subsection 13.24.015 is amended to read as follows:
13.24.015 Thirty miles per hour.
No person shall drive a vehicle upon any of the following designated streets at a speed
greater than thirty miles per hour:
(a) 1 Peninsula Avenue between El Camino Real and California Drive; and
(b) 1 Hillside Drive between Alvarado Avenue and El camino Real.
The director of public works is authorized and directed to procure appropriate signs giving notice
of said prima facie speed limits, and to erect the same upon the above designated streets.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the
1
a
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day
of 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_ day of 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COI.INCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
C :\FILES\ORDINANC\speedoccidental. pwd wpd
2
10
Tanya McVeigh Peterson
340 Occidental Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
(6s0) ssE-07sE
April 18,2002
Ms- Doris Mortensen
Secretary - Traffic Safety & Parking Commission
City Hatl - 501 Prirnnose Ave.
Burlingarne, CA 94010
R,e: BEnd Intersection end Excessive Speeding at Chapin and Occidentd Avenue*
Dear Ms. Mortensen:
I recently made a complaint to the Burlingarne Police Department with respect to an
intersection n€ar my husband's and my Ircnrc at lvhich we have both witnessed several
ne6.rccidentsirvolvingbothvehictesadpedestrim.s. Su@ue,tttomycorrylaint,my
tusUan4 Rich, spoke at lengthwith Sergeant Darm Cutler who reconrmended that we
write you to request to be placed on your trafrc safety cormd$ion meeting agenda at the
earliest date possible so that my hirsbard and I can discuss this issue with the commission
in detail
As backgroun{ ufren vehicles or @estrians travel west on Chapin Avenue from El Camino
Real, they encounter a blind intersection at Occidental Avenue. Tk ftct that Occidental and
C1rrpin Avenues do not imersect at,riglrt angles creates tk blind mtrne ofthis intersectbn.
However, the fact that there is m stop sign at this intersetiorU in addition to the high overall rate
of speed (very comnon for speeds to reach 45-50 MPH as cars specd northward down
Occidental Ave. towards Chapin Ave., either turning right at Ctmpin Ave. or continuing down to
where Occidental Ave. and El Camino Real meet), conffiute to this dangerous situation.
It is my opinion, and that of nearty all ofour neighbors with wlrom we have spoken, that tw'o
things need to be addressed here - speed ard the blind intersection And it seems very
possiible to all ofus tht both issues could be addressed bythe installatbn of stop signs on
Occidental Ave. and its cross streets at Burlingame and Chapin Avenues.
I understand from my husband's conversation with Sergeant Cutler that this situation cannot
be solved overnight and that there are a variety of procedures in place to address tk same.
As such rry husband and I verymuch look forwmd to discussing this issue with the
commission and hold hope that sonrething can be done to demonstrably inprove this
situation before there is a serious injury or death to a rnotorist arxC/or pedestrian here.
In advance, thank you very much for your consideration of this request-
;-iC
e
Yours
CC: Hon Cathy Baylock- Burlingame City Council
Mr. Hamayoun Barekat - Traffic Engineer, City of Burlingarne
Sgt. Dawn Cutler - Burlingame Police Department
ru,Ktu
6
APR 2 2 2A02
3
\
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Vice Chair Evans.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 3 of 5 Commissioners present.
4. CURRENTBUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4. 1 .1 Approval of Minutes for August 8, 2002
The minutes were submitted and approved with one correction of ltem 4.2.1, first paragraph:
replace the last sentence with "chair Mclver suggested meeting first with the C-l and c-3 areas
(including Burlingame Plaza) during the regular September Traffrc commission Meeting. The
commission will meet later with the M-l area. The last area to meet with will be the R-l area.,,
4.1.2 Special Meeting to Discuss Hillside Drive Speed Bumps
Vice Chair Evans suggested this meeting be held in conjunction with the nexl regular Traffic
Commission Meeting and the other commissioners agreed.
4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS.
4.2.1 Millbrae BART Station - Parking Impacts on City streets - Possible Parking Restrictions -
Commercial Area west of California Drive to Burlingame plaza Area
Comm. Cohen explained that the Commission is looking for input from the commercial area so
that the city can proactively address potential parking problems posed by BART parking in this
area. From the floor, Mr. Pearce already has his private property posted and suggested parking
permits if BART causes a problem.
Mr. chou advised that he received two responses: a business at 1860 El camino Real supports
a two-hour parking limit; and a business at 1515 Trousdale Drive has on-site parking for patients
already, but employees park on the street and may be affected by BART customers.
For next month's meeting, notices will be sent to the M-l area east of the railroad tracks to
Highway 101 and up to David Road.
4.2.2 Occidental Avenue - Speed Zone Change and Stop Sign Request - ktter
Mr. Chou advised that after looking at speed limits on other streets, staff is comfortable with
consideration of reduction of the speed to 25 mph on Occidental Avenue. Sgt. Cutler advised she
had spoken with two Traffic commissioners - one might have a problem with it, the other would
The City of Buriingame Page 2
TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2002
not as long as it was a legal Engineering traffic study and had the same criteria. Mr. Chou
performed a speed study of 200 vehicles on a weekday during non-peak hours and the critical
speed was 32 mph; and although staff would look at making it 30 mph, they will look at other
factors to justiff the 25 mph as part of the study.
From the floor, Mr. Peterson submitted a petition for their neighborhood to be included in the
Residential Traffic Calming Program and a neighbor's letter and stated that the 25 mph limit
would be terrific. However, he also strongly favors 4-way stop signs at Occidental and Chapin
Avenues. Ms. Metcalfe stated exiting her driveway is very difficult with speeding traffic going
by. She recommends stop signs and 25 mph limit. Mr. Mason stated although 25 mph limit is not
the best idea, stop signs are necessary. Mr. Malaspina stated he can hear drivers "punch it"
coming off of El Camino Real and go speeding by all the time.
Mr. Erbacher advised that there have been only two accidents in the late '90's which could have
been due to speed, and the traffic volume and pedestrian volume are too low to warrant stop signs
at this site. Therefore, if this commission recorlmends stop signs to Council, staff would disagree.
Vice Chair Evans supports lowering the speed to 25 mph as a first step and using intensive police
enforcement to see what effect it would have on the traffic, as well as installing enlarged speed
limit signs. Sgt. Cutler advised that the speed would be radar-enforced as a result of the speed
survey. It was moved and seconded (Comms. De Angelis/Cohen) to make this an Action item
immediately. It was then moved and seconded (Comms. De Angelis/Cohen) to recommend to
Council to reduce speed to 25 mph between El Camino Real and Barroilhet Avenue with increased
police enforcement and to install enlarged speed limit signs and two Speed Enforced by Radar
signs, one each way, and to include this site in the Police Department's Selective Enforcement
Report. Unanimously approved by the Commission.
Mr. Mason asked that the intersection be marked with 25 mph in the pavement as well. Mr.
Erbacher stated that speed markings on pavement are usually not done due to maintenance costs;
instead, the City will install raised centerline markers near the Floribunda intersection and the
Chapin intersection to encourage reduced speed.
4.2.3 Joint Council-Commission Meeting - October'7,2002,6:30 p.m.
After a brief discussion, staff agreed to prepare a list of items for the Commission to present to
Council which include: suggest overnight parking remain status quo; budgeting for more police
enforcement; BART input meetings; and list of RTCP requests awaiting funding. Vice Chair
Evans will be absent from this meeting.
4.2.4 Request for Height Limit Parking on Occidental Avenue at Bellevue Avenue
Mr. Erbacher will send a letter to the petitioner advising that this site belongs to County of San
Mateo. Also, the problem of sight distance is a Hillsborough issue.
The City of Burlingame Page 3
TO:
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA Tb
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE 10.07.02
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SIIBMITTED
DATE SEPTEMBER 30. 2OO2
APPROYEb
FROM: CITY PLANNER
SUBIECT: REPORT ON CITY ROLE IN MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
This is an update on the city's future role in the replacement of the Mills-Peninsula Hospital including a new
medical office building on the present hospital site on El Camino at Trousdale Drive; and how that potential
project fits into the city's on-going Specific Area Plan study for the northern end of the City including Rollins
Road.
BACKGROUND:
In the Spring, City Council decided to undertake a major advanced planning program for the north end of the
city. The study boundary was defined as Rollins Road from Broadway to the City line with Millbrae and the
area east of the railroad tracks bounded by Dufferin-Davis to Marco Polo-Ogden to Murchison (the Millbrae
city boundary). The focus of the North End/Rollins Road planning study was to initially examine the area
and then select a specific area planning area from within the broader study area. The North End area was of
planning concern since it was the area which had the greatest potential for impact from the Millbrae BART
(end of the line) station. One of the largest properties in single ownership within the North EndlRollins Road
study area is the 23 acres owned by the Hospital District.
While the future site development ofthe hospital will be directed by the Hospital District, a public agency, the
city's North End planning study will have to take into account the access points and other features of the
proposed development of the hospital site, when they are determined. If the use of the hospital site is not
determined before our North End planning effort is completed, then the hospital site will have to be identified
as a "hole" in our plan; and we can offer to the hospital district input from the land use and design
recommendations in our plan. If the hospital project is submitted before we have completed our plan and the
hospital site is apart of the selected Specific Area Planning Area, we can incorporate into the SAP plan
interactive policies and design guidelines for the development.
The city has no jurisdiction over the Hospital District in the disposition of their site or what hospital services
they offer to the tax payers within their district. The California Environmental Quality Act allows the Hospital
District to prepare the environmental document for any change to their services, land ownership and/or
facilities. This could be a "program" environmental review or EIR, similar to the kind of environmental
evaluation the city did for the Housing Element. It would not preclude the preparation of a "project"
environmental document on an expanded hospital project. Under CEQA the replacement of only the existing
facilities at the hospital are exempt from environmental review if the project is just one of replacing the
facilities presently on the site.
BY
BY ,/r,141r
REPORT,ON CITY ROLE IN MILLS-PENINSALA HOSPITAL REPI^ACEMENT OCTOBER7,2OO2
The present hospital site is zoned Unclassified. Unclassified is a zoning applied to land owned by the public'
The zoning ,"quir", a conditional use permit when a use on the site is changed or expanded by adding other
uses. How.r"., if u site zoned Unclassified changes from public to private ownership, it is no longer eligible
for an Unclassified zoning designation and must be appropriately rezoned. In some cases the General Plan
must also be amended so that the land use designation is consistent with the new private use.
Because of the Unclassified zoning any redevelopment project on the hospital site, so long as the land is
owned by the Hospital District, is sudect to a conditional use permit. If the proposed project includes a
medical off.. buiiding then environmental review is also required. This "project" environmental document
will be based on the pioposed uses and construction plan. The city should consider preparing the
environmental docum.nt for the project. However, it is not the city's responsibility to prepare any required
CEeA evaluation of program*uiir factors affecting the project such as land ownership, services offered in the
hospital, changes in the role and function of the Hospital District. These factors need to be presented as given
*hen the phys-ical project is presented since they affect the General Plan, zoning and very criteria used by the
City to evaluate the project.
Interestingly CEeA designates to the Hospital District, as a public agency, the primary role of lead agency
in the preparation of the ntR on the proposed hospital project. Moreover, because of action by the State
fegislatuie, if the project were simply the replacement of the exiting hospital facility it would be exempt from
CEQA However, sinle the proporidproject, as we have seen it so far, include a medical office building to be
leased to doctors practicing in the hospital, the "proposed" project will not be exempt from CEQA.
In the case of the Hospital District being lead agency in the preparation of the environmental document, the
City would be a responsible agency. As a responsible agency the City could comment on, require evaluative
stuiies, and influence the outCome of the environmental review which would then become the environmental
document for the conditional use permit action for the City. At public hearing for the conditional use permit,
the City could require modifications to the project, implement mitigations and address non-environmental
issues which addriss site specific issues. Since an EIR is a third parly, technical disclosure document its
content should not be affecled by which agency prepares it. If the city is to prepare the future hospitaVoffice
project EIR, the city must receive from the Hospital District deferral of their role as lead agency to the City.
A Note about Environmental Review for the Hospital
There seem to be two issues in replacement of the hospital. One is the future role of the Peninsula Hospital
District in providing health serviCes to its servic e area. The other issue is the replacement of the hospital
structure with a seiJmically sound facility by 2013. Both issues may be subject to CEQA evaluation- It is
staffs opinion that it is not the function of the city to prepare the "program Efit."' on those things that compose
the futuie role of the peninsula Hospital District. Under CEQA the Hospital District is lead agency, publicly
elected, and should represent all oflhe constituents of the district on the matter of the function and services of
the public agency. As noted above the Hospital District as lead agency may choose to defer to the City and
the tity can accept, the responsibility for preparing the "project EIR" focused on proposed demolition and
new construction on the current hospital site subject to CEQA - not the future of the Hospital District itself.
One never knows how the technical studies for an environmental evaluation report will come out. It is the
responsibility of the lead agency preparing the EIR ("program" or "project") to make any findings of over
riding .onc"in when the EIR identifies that there will be a "substantial and unmitigatable environmental
effeci". It is more appropriate for the Hospital District, which represents all the taxpayers within its
jurisdiction, to make inyfindings of over riding concern for the "program" changes the District Board's
a
REPTORT ON CITY ROLE IN MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT ocToBERT' 2002
policies and actions will cause. These changes may include sale of district property, range of services offered
Ly the district, even how the district will continue as an taxing entity It is possible, as lead agency for a
..project" for which these issues have not been decided, that the City Council could find themselves facing
making findings of over riding consideration in these policy areas which go beyond the city's boundaries and
jurisdiction.
As staffunderstands CEQA it is the choice of the city to accept the responsibility as lead agency in preparing
a "project" EIR. The Hospital District may refuse their role as lead agency, but we must accept their
uppli*tion for a conditional use permit. . If the role of lead agency is in dispute, then an appeal is made to
ttre Omce of planning and Research which oversees CEQA in Sacramento and they decide It i1 staff s
opinion that the "program" environmental document is clearly the jurisdiction of the Hospital District. If
required by the addition of the medical oflice building, the "project" EIR for actual construction of the new
facilities is more likely to been seen by OPR as the City's responsibility.
A final note. In addition to the North End/Rollins Road Specific Area Plan, staffis also preparing in house an
Update for the Bayfront/Anza Specific Area Plan, working on the implementing ordinances for the Housing
Element Work Program; and continuing to process the Safeway project and a major hotel on the Bayfront.
Attached is a time line that shows the time commitment and simultaneous progless of all of these active
programs. Because of budgetary constraints the Planning Department has deferred replacing our vacancy in
ihe ilerical position for four months. The department has also recently lost aZoning Technician which reduces
our current planning technical staffrng. In order to meet possible budget reduction targets for FY 2002-2003
we may not be able to fill both of these positions this fiscal year or next. It should be further noted that, given
our present Planning work load and staff shortage, should the Council accept the role as lead agency for the
"project" EIR at the hospital, the hospital developer will be asked to fund a technical consultant to
supplement planning staffand, of course, to pay for the environmental consultant.
Attachments:
Planning Department Memo, August 20,\OO2,Re: Preparation of CEQA Documents for Replacement of
Mills-Peninsula Hospital, with attachments.
Planning Projects 2002-2003 Pert Chart, September 2002
TO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANIDUM
City Council
Meg Monroe, City Planner
August 20,2002
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Preparation of CEQA Documents for Replacement ofMlls-Peninsula Hospital
At a recent meeting, City Council asked Jim Nantell to prepare for you a list of "pros and cons''
regarding having the city be responsible for the preparation ofthe environmental documents for
the Mills-Peninsula Hospital District. Replacement of seismically unsafe hospital facilities have
been statutorily exempt from CEQA. However, because the current proposal for the hospital
replacement, includes possible land transactions, disposition ofother issues possibly subject to
public vote as well as inclusion of a 150,000 GSF office building in the hospital replacement
project, it appears both the items subject to election and the construction project will be subject
to CEQA.
\
Attached you will find a staff analysis of the city or the Hospital District preparing the
environmental documents. Since this analysis was prepared by city stafi, we asked Carol
Groom if she would be willing to prepare a similar analysis from the Mills-Peninsula Health
Services perspective. We have not yet heard from Ms. Groom. When we do we will forward
her comments under separate cover. We would note that this attachment is for your use and
not public distribution since this picture is evolving as we speak.
RAMIFICATIONS OT' CTTY PREPARING ENYIROI\TMENTAL DOCUMENT X'OR
DEYELOPMENT PROGRAM A}TD/OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO REPLACE MILLS
PEIYINSI]LA HOSPITAL
The hospital structure at ll83 El Camino Real is seismically unsafe, and is required to be removed or
replaced by 2013. Over the past several years the Hospital District (a public agency with an elected
board ) has joined with a private hospital located within the district's boundaries. The Mills-Peninsula
Hospital Services (a public-private agency) separate from the District Board, is working with Sutter
Health Services (a private non-profit agency) to build a new hospital and 150,000 SF office building.
The first two floors or so of the 150,000 SF office building will house the administrative offtces of the
new hospital and the upper floors will be leased to doctors. It appears at this time that, because of the
offrce building, the replacement of the hospital is not statutorily exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act. (CEQA).
The Hospital District owns about26 acres of land on which the existing hospital is located. The district
has been doing site planning focusing on the land use planning and health services which would be
provided on the entire site. The first plan presented to the City included a hospital on l0 acres and a
series of medical office buildings on the remaining 16 acres. The l0 acres would have been leased by
the private-nonprofit hospital developer (Sutter Health), and the remainder of the site retained and later
developed by the Hospital District. Over time the site planning has evolved to the entire site being
occupied by a hospital and a 150,000 GSF administrative/medical office building. ln this subsequent
plan about 9 acres at the back of the site offMarco Polo Way have been left vacant, designated as "open
space" with no long term use indicated. At this time the District Board has not adopted a development
plan or services program.
Because it is a public taring agency, if the Hospital District were to dissolve or sell its property the issue
must be put on the ballot. To go on the ballot the development plarq health services plan and land sale
(if proposed) must include a completed CEQA evaluation.
Once the voters have approved a development plaq health services plan and disposition of the land, the
applicant must prepare a detailed construction project for replacement of the hospital. Ifthe properly is
to be sold to a private entity it must be rezoned. ln any event, under current or new zoning, the proposed
project must be reviewed and approved by the City. This project would include location of buildings,
parking facilities, access, landscaping, utillty capaclty, availability of public services, etc. The
construction project will require a CEQA document, more specific than the development plan/program
document prepared for the election.
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), either the Hospital District or the city (with
Hospital District permission) may be lead agency for the preparation of the environmental analysis for
eithir the development plar/program or the construction of the project. If the environmental review is
done in two steps, different agencies could prepare each report. The table that follows looks at the
ramifications ofthe crty preparing both documents.
Ro;nificdions OlCig nqofigEn*onmatatDoqnp* Fu D*doptoil ProgronAnilOrCorctnction hojectTo Rf,iuMilb'
Penirlrn.lailwpitot AagtiZ0' 21fi2
HOSPITAL DISTRICT PREPARES
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
CITY PREPARES
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
. Clty is not directly involved in the issue of what
services in hospital and who owns it (public or
private).
. Crty can participate as a player and advocate city's
planning agenda independently of health service
changes and future of District.
o District controls health delivery issues; the city is
not a part ofthat discussion.o Dishict Board implements its vision of its future
and role in health care service delivery.
. Council will be pushed to take a position on
regional health care issues- will need to take time
to become informed and responsible for an
informed opinion on something beyond city's
jurisdiction.
. Will shift political pressure offthe Hospital
District Board.. Public may not understand the limitations of the
city's control granted by the environmental review
process.
. Council will be empowered to address kind of
hospital and who owns it in the future, as a part of
determination.
r Issue of disposition of the District's land and
services offered by the hospital are not a city
Council election issue in November '03.
. Allows for an election on disposition ofthe land
and hospital's services, also on the District's future
in the Marchtime frame.
e Essential to District's agent Sutter Health (agency
funding construction) to proceed in timely fashion
to keep the design team on schedule and avoid
delays which will increase the cost of the project.
. Hospital should be under construction within a
of and well before 2013
o Will keep the issue of hospital replacement/land
ownership/district control alive through the
November'03 election.r Because of controversy, will require attendance at
additional special meetings for review.
r Diverts City Council and Citizens energy from
other critical civic issues.
. Clty may needto prepare technical studies to
counter EIR, if document is too self serving, city
may be forced by residents to sue Disrict.. Crty can participate as responsible agency to make
sure appropriate mitigation measures are included
in EIR.
. Hospital district and their developer will have to
deal with city involvement in their decisions and
district will need to relinquish some control.. Crty will have more control over the validity of the
content of the environmental document.
. Can make sure that appropriate mitigation
measures for the hospital project are included in
the EIR.
-2-
S : Weninmla HospitalWmiftcatiot settingS. I 2.0 2wDfi 2.doc
Health Service/District Issues
STAFF REPORT
TO: IIONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COTJNCIL
DATE: Septemberl9r2002
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager
AGENDA 8aITEM #
MTG.
DATE rolT lo2
BY
BY
650-558-7222
SLJBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Transfer of Funds for 2001
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution adjusting selected appropriations as described below.
BACKGROUND: Although the 2001-02 budget expenditures were within total appropriations
(approximately 97%o of the budget was spent--$940,000 under budget,) several programs exceeded budget for
unanticipated circumstances. Some overages occurred due to the completion ofthe accounting for the
allocation for computer services. In the adopted budget, we indicated that the main computer for accounting
and water billing had not yet been allocated. The result was a reduction of about $300,000 in the
Administration/Information Services Budget, and an increase in all operating budgets by the same amount.
BUDGET APPROPRIATION TRANSFERS
DEPARTMENT FT]NDING SOURCE AMOUNT EXPLANATION
City Clerk Non Dept'I.$25,000 costs, date slgrage project
City Auorney Planning $17,000 Outside legal costs
Retiree Health Non Dept'I.$4,000 Health co sts underestimated
Fire Police $73,000 Computer cost and compensated absence
allocation
Building Engineering.$20,000 Computer cost allocation
Streets Engineering $24,000 9-11 response; computer cost allocation
Library Police $30,000 Computer cost allocation; part time salaries
Recreation Police $46,000 Computer cost allocation; part time salaries
Water Water Retained
Earnings
$11,000 Computer cost allocation; part-time salaries to
eqver disability time
Capital
Projects
BHS Football Field
Reimbursement
940,627 Allocate to costs for Village Park, Laguna
Park and Washington Park Baseball Field
Work
TOTAL $294,627
ATTACHMENTS : Resolution
a
CITYOF BURLINGAIIIE
APPROPRIATION TRANSFER REQUEST
DATE: September 79, 2OO2DEPARTMENT Various
1. REQUESTTRANSFER OF APPROPRIA BELOW:l IUNU A5 LIU I tsU
PROJ AMT DESCRIPTIONFUNDDEPTOBJT
See Attached290,627.00
See Attached290,627.00
FROM:
TO:
BY:DATE: ?- Jo - oL
Justification (Aftach Memo
DEPARTMENT HEAD
Necessary)
DArE q'zo 'Oz-
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ACTION NOTCOUNCIL
REQUIRED
Remarks:
DATE:,)0-OJ
AS REVISEDAS REQUESTED3.
Remarks:
RESOLUTION_
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITYOF BURLINGAME
APPROVING TRAI{SFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2OO{.2002
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, that
WHEREAS, the Department hereinabove named in the Request for Appropriation, Allotment or Transfer of Funds has
requeted the transfer of certain funds as described in said Request and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager
has recommended the transfer of funds as sed forth hereinabove:
NOW, THEREFORE, lT lS HEREBY ORDERED AND DETERilI}{ED that the recommendations of the City Manager be
approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected.
MAYOR
l, ANN T.MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the foregoing resolution was introduced
at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
and was adopted thereafter by the
CITY CLERK
L:\Forms & Templates\Transfer Request.doc
BY:
Transfer From Amount Transfer To Amount
Program Account Program Account
Non Dept. Programs
Non Dept. Programs
Non Dept. Programs
Planning
Engineering
Engineering
Police
10164560-240 $
101-64560-240 $
101-64560-210 $
101-64400-210 $
101-66'100-030 $
10166100-031 I
10165100-030 S
20,000 City Clerk
5,000
'101-64200-110 $ 25,000
101-64550-040 $4,000
17,000
20,000
24,000
30,000
46,000
73,000
101-64350-210 S
101-65300-702 $
4,000
17,000
20,000
24,000
149,000
Other Emp. Benefits
City Attorney
Building
Streets
Library
Recreation
Fire
10166210-011 $
10167500-702 $
101€8010-702 $
101-65200-702 S
General Fund $
Water Retained Earnings 526-26010 $
BHS Football Field Reimb. 320-80530-010 $
239,000
1 1,000 Water
$ 239,000
526-69020-220 $ 11,000
3
6,867
33,757
I q,627
40,627 Laguna Park Playground 320-78/.70-01
Village Park Playground 320-7U80-01
Wshington Park Basebal 320-801 90-01
0$
0$
0$
City of Burlingame
Exhlbit Detailing Year End Appropriation Transfera
FEcal Year 2001-{r2
,
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AIID CITY COUNCIL
DATE: September2012002
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager
650-558-7222
SLTBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Loan to Sewer Fund
AGENDA 8bITEM #
MTG.
DATE rolT lo2
BY
BY
APPROVED
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution
BACKGROUND: As part of the various reports on our financing problern, staffhas summarized the revenue
shortfall for water and sewer funds. The sewer fund, in particular has had a cash squeeze dating back to last
year. This has required deferring capital improvements transfers. The long term plan provides for an
operating reserve to resolve this problem. As a short term action, I recommend a loan from the self insurance
fund to the sewer fund to provide an operating reserve that will insure sufficient cash flow. The sewer fund
would pay interest to the self insurance fund based on the average yield of city investments.
This approach was taken a few years ago with the water fund. That loan has been fully paid back to the self
insurance fund.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
\-
CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROPRIATION TRANSFER REQUEST
DATEDEPARTMENT
t NTOUCST TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS AS LISTED BELOW:
DESCRIPTIONDEPTOBJTPROJAMTFUND
750,000.00 Self lnsurance Fund - Unreserved Retained Eamings61826010
Sewer Fund - Loan Due to Self lnsurance Fund52722030750,000.00
FROM:
TO:
BY:a5re:n-7c)^02-
Justification (Attach Memo Necessary)
DArE 9'20-02'
2.COUNCIL
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ACTION NOT
REQUIRED
Remarks:
BY:DATE:-0
AS REVISEDAS REQUESTED
Remarks:
RESOLUTTON_
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY GOUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAiiE
APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR FISCALYEAR 2002-2003
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Budingame, that
WHEREAS, the Department herdnabove named in the Request for Appropriation, Allotment or Transfer of Funds has
requested the transfer of cerlain funds as described in said Request: and
UUI{EREAS, the Finance Direc{or has approved said Request as to accounting and available balances, and the City Manager
has recommended the transfer of funds as set forth hereinabove:
NOW, THEREFORE, lT lS HEREBY ORDERED At{D DETERIf,INED that the recommendations of the City Manager be
approved and that the transfer of funds as set forth in said Request be effected.
MAYOR
l, ANN T.MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby cedify that the foregoing resolution was introduced
at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
and was adopted thereafter by the
CITY CLERK
L:\Forms J,
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 8cITEM #
MTG.
DATE r0l7lo2
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: September12,2002
APPROVED
FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager/
Administrative Services Director
650-558-7222
suBJECr: Approve Annual Report of the District; Adopt Resolution Of Intention To Continue San
Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District, To Establish The Basis For And To Levy The
Assessments For The District For The Year 2003, And To Set Dates For Public Hearings On The
District And The Proposed Assessments
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Approve Annual Report.
2. Adopt Resolution Of Intention Setting Public Hearing For 7 P.M., Monday, November lB,2OO2.
DISCUSSION:
The San Mateo Convention and Visitors Bureau has administered the Business Improvement District (BID)
since its inception, and has now submitted its annual report on the activities of the District. The Resolution of
Intention is a required part of the renewal process, and will be followed by a public hearing at the next council
meeting.
The District encompasses much of San Mateo County, including the unincorporated areas and the areas within
most of the cities in the County. Burlingame acts as lead agency for the District, setting the annual
assessments and processing the collected assessments. The County and participating cities collect the
assessments on a monthly or quarterly basis and remit the assessments to Burlingame, which by agreement
with the Bureau pay this over to the Bureau as district provider. The assessment for 2OO2 was about $1.4
million.
The assessments for 2003 will be on the same basis as for 2002. The programs for 2003 will remain generally
the same as described in the annual report.
Attachment
Annual Report of the District
Proposed Resolution of Intention
Distribution
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
BY
BY
San Mateo County
convention & visitors bureau
111 anza boulevard
suite 410
burlingame CA 94010
phone 650.348.7600
800.288.4748
www.visitsa n mateocou nty.com
fax 650.348.7587
San Mateo County
conventiot\ ohd" visltors buruu
Tl.9"41, "llk 9.-* Faza,,a,rco W A,rr-
Septembet 10,2002
Burlingame City Council
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Members of the Council
Enclosed, please find a copy of the San Mateo County Tourism
Business lmprovement District/San Mateo County Convention &
Visitors Bureau annual report. While it has been a trying year for
our hotels and all hospitality-related businesses in the area, the
good news is that through the TBID, we have been able to market
the region as never before and book group business at a record
pace.
Our recommendation is that we retain the current year's
assessment formula for the year 2003. Please let us know if you
have any questions. I will be happy to present a report at one of
your October Council meetings. As always, we thank you for your
support as lead agency for the TBID.
Sincerely,
a^<trl'i
Anne LeClair
President and CEO
Cc: Stephanie Ryan
Jim Nantell
Larry Anderson
Rahn Becker
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF
THE CITY OT BURLINGAME DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO ESTABLISH ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2OO3 YEAR
TIIE SAN MATEO COTINTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., the
San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of
promoting tourism in the District through promotion ofscenic, recreational, cultural, hospitality, and
other attractions in the San Mateo County region; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board
has filed its 2002 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments
for the 2003 year; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Tourism Business lmprovement District through the
City's agreement with the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau has established a basic
foundation to promote tourism in the District and the programs for the coming year should
significantly help the hospitality industry bridge the current economic slump; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find as
follows:
1. The 2002 annual report of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement
District Advisory Board is approved.
2. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2003 year on
hotels in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance Nos. 1648 and 1678, to pay for
progftrms and activities of the District.
3. The types ofprograms and activities proposed to be funded by the levy ofassessments
on hotels in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference. These
programs and activities are without substantial change from those previously established for the
District.
4. The method, basis, and amounts for levying the assessments on all hotels within the
District are set forth in Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference, and would retain the same
I
basic formulas as those used in the previous year. This means that the assessments for most hotels
would be the same as the previous year, unless the number of hotel rooms in the hotel had been
reduced or increased.
5. New hotels shall not be exempt from assessment.
6. A public hearing on the proposed assessments for the year 2003 is hereby set for
November 4,2002, at7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at the Council
Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
7 . The Council will receive testimony and evidence at the public hearing, and interested
persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail
or delivered to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010.
8. Oral or written protests may be made at the hearing. To count in a majority protest
against the proposed assessment for the 2003 year, a protest must be in writing and submitted to the
City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on November 4,2002. A written protest may
be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of that public hearing. Each written
protest shall identifu the hotel and its address. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the
official records of the City of Burlingame as the owner of the hotel, then the protest shall contain or
be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the hotel. Any written protest
as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the
inegularity or defect to which objection is made.
9. [f at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the
owners of hotels within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
assessments of the entire District, as to the proposed assessments for the 2003 year, no assessment
for 2003 year shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are of record written
protests by the owners ofhotels within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%)or more of the
total assessments of the entire District only as to a program or activity proposed, then that type of
improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2003 year.
10. Further informationregardingthe proposed assessments and changes and procedures
for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 primrose Road,
Burlingame, California, phone 650 - 558-7203. The annual report ofthe San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District is on file and available at the Office ofthe City Clerk at 501 Primrose
2
Road, Burlingame, Califomia.
I 1. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing the
this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Burlingame in accordance with
the requirements ofthe Government and Streets & Highways Codes and mailing them in accordance
with those requirements and Ordinance Nos. 1648 and 1678 as applicable.
MAYOR
[, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City of Burlingame do hereby certifr that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe City Council on the _ day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COTINCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
C :\FILESVIotelBidV003 intro.res.wpd
J
September l2
October 7
Not later than
October 14
Not later than
October 14
Belmont
County of San Mateo
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Millbrae
TIMELINE F'OR 2OO3 ASSESSMENTS FOR
SAI\ MATEO COT]NTY TOtruSM BUSII\ESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
(assumes no increase in assessments or change in boundaries)
Advisory Board submits annual report and recommends assessment levels for 2002
City Council approves annual report and adopts resolution of intention regarding
2002 Assessments
Copy of annual report and resolution of intention mailed to each of the
participating local agencies (Ord. No. 1648, g 8)
'}hpRedwood City
San Bruno
San Carlos
San Mateo
South San Francisco
r\iI!,
Notice of public hearing and copy of resolution of intention mailed to each of the
hotels in the TBID with proposed 2003 assessments (S&H g 36523(c)))Y I
October 14 Resolution of intention published in newspapers of general circulation in each city
affected for at least seven (7) days before public hearing (s&H g 36523(a)) - this
means that if published in the Times, publish 6 times, starting at least seven days
before the hearing
November 4 Burlingame City Council holds public hearing on 2003 assessments - hearing and
action can be continued
Close of public hearing Time to protest annual assessment closes (hearing on assessments must be closed
no later than 30 days after it is begun (36535(a)) - no later than December 4
Close of public hearing Burlingame adopts resolution adopting programs and assessments for 2003
Timeline--1 Rev. 10/2912001
t
I
STAFF REPORT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
September 25,2002
PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
10t7 to2
8d
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBMITTED
BY
APPROVED
BY
sUBJECT: RESOLUTTON ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA DRIVE RESURFACI PROJECT - CP 8023(1)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council accept the California Drive Resurfacing Project by
resolution in the amount of $858,940.
DISCUSSION: On April l, 2002, the project was awarded to Top Grade Consfuction, Inc. in the amount of
$669,797 . The construction was completed successfully for a total cost of $858,940. The increase of $189,143 is
mainly due to quantlty adjusffnents such as asphalt base repair and asphalt overlay and sidewalk repair.
The City has received the necessary l0% maintenance bond and staff recommends acceptance at this time
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment
BUDGET IMPACT:
The following is a financial summary of the project:
Expenditures:Funds Availability from Gas Tax & MeasureA:
Construction
Consultant Inspection
Engineering Administration
Total:
$ 858,940
$ 30,000$ 80.000
$ 968,940
Project 80231
Project 80232
Total:
$ 869,000
$ 120.666
$ 989,666
Staff will ffansfer the remaining gas tax funds to other resurfacing projects at a later time
Donald T. Chang, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, Finance, Top Grade Construction, Inc.
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\8023laccept.wpd
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - CALIFORNIA DRIVE RESURFACING PROJECT
BY TOP GRADE CONSTRUCTION
crTY PROJECT NO. 8023(.1)
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by TOP GRADE
CONSTRUCTION, INC . under the terms of its contract with the City dated APRIL I , 2N2, has been
completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 8023(1)
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted
Mayor
I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiry that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
,2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
S:\A Public Works Diretory\Author, By Nme\Peggy Adam t IE$\RESOLUTN.ACC.Wpd
City Clerk
TOP GRADE CONSTRUCTION
50 CONTMCTORS STREET
tIVERMORE, CA 94550
TELEPHONE: (925) 449-5764 FAx (925)-449-5875
ITEM
#
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PROGRBSS PAYMENT -.3--1.ELNAIr]-
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM.
CALIEORNIA DRIVE 6 BROADIIAY INTERSECTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 8023 (1)
UNIT : BID : QUANTITY :
SIZE : AMOUNT : TO DATE :
DATE:
EOR THE MONTH OF:
PURCHASE ORDER #
september-23-02
JUNE
12905
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIT
PRICE
BID
OUANTITY
50
10
10
1, 045
5, 573
2,370
8,0?0
4.898
7,'78L
100
1. 315
3,005
1,41
1,037
2
350
470
345
4,140
5
2
140
91
10
600
10
425
t
PAID
AMOUNT
TO DATE
PREVIOUS
PAID
AI'IOUNT
THIS PMT
A).
1
2
3
4
5
6
'1
8
9
10
11
r2
13
14
15
r6
11
18
79
20
B).
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
I
9
10
11
t2
13
14
TONS
c. Y.
TONS
TONS
TONS
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
L. F.
L. F.
L. F.
L. F.
EACH
EACH
TONS
TONS
s.Y.
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
L. F.
L. E.
L. F.
L. F.
$0.00
$0.00
90. 00
90. 00
90.00
90.00
90.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0. 00
90. 00
s0. 00
90. 00
s0.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
s0.00
s0.00
C.ATIFORNI.A DRrvE
: A.C. Digout Repair
: Conclete Base Removal
: Agglegate Base
: A.C. Leveling Coulse
: A.C. Ovexlay
: A.C. Cold Plane
: Wedge Grinding
: Paving Reinforce Fablic
: Adjust Manholes
: Adjust Valves, llonwents Lilp-holes & Etc.
: Traffic signal Loop Detecto! Systen
: Type "A" 6 "AY" (Pavenent Markers)
; ?ype "DI, "G" € Blue (Pavement Markexs)
! 6* solid Line -- Paint
! 8fi Solid Line -- Paint
r 4I Solid Line -- Paint
; 12'! solid Line -- Paint
: Parking Tees -- Paint
: Legends & Arr@s -- Paint
: Handicap Legends -- Paint
BROADWAX IITTERSECTION
! 1.5 A.C. Levefing Course
: 2" A.C. Grerfay
: 3il A.C. CoId Plane
: Paving Reinfolce Fabric
: Adjust Uanholes
: Adjust VaLves. Monwents Lilp-holes & Etc.
Traffic Signal Loop Detector systen
Type "A" & "AY" (Pavenent Markers)
Type "D", "G" & Blue (Pavement Markers)
6" solid Line -- Paint
8" Solid Line -- Paint
4" Sofid Line -- Paint
12" solid Line -- Paint
Legends c Arr@s -- Paint
965. 00
956.00
s28. 00
90.80
9260. 00
9350. 00
9366.00
92. 00
95. 00
$0-s0
91.00
92.50
91.40
92. 00
95, s00
91,700
s1,700
959,565
9300,942
s66,360
921,,189
945,400
$13,300
910.920
$38,160
99,796
98,905
s50
91, 315
I 130
94 ,207
I 882
92 ,07 4
970
9592 ,1 65
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
22.00
0.00
0.00
2,685.00
6,1'7 6.00
3,191.00
6.760. 00
54 .444 , 00
64.50
40.00
134 . 00
5. 84 8. 00
), ,262 . O0
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
44
0
0
256
110
134
95
t69
95
126
119
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
009
008
003
94t
a2z
648
'7',7 Z
94ts
"14\
24\
40t
B6t
00t
00t
00t
00s
00s
003
00t
92,420 .00
90.00
90.00
9153,045.00
s333,504 - 00
989,348.00
lta,252.00
$43,555.20
922,515 .00
s10.400.00
s{ 8, 24 0. 00
I 1 1, 696. 00
$6,310.00
s0. 00
s0. 00
$0. 00
90. 00
90. 00
s0.00
s0.00
s739,345.20
92,420 .00
$0.00
90. 00
9153,045.00
s333,50{.00
989,3{8.00
918.252.00
943,555.20
922,57 5 .OO
91o,4oo.oo
$48,240.00
911,696.00
$6, 310. 00
$0. 00
$0. 00
$0.00
90.00
90. 00
s0.00
90.00
56,750
38
42
106
CAI,IEORNIA DRTVE TOTAI,$l 3! ,3!5 .20 ....1......................................,..-$--0-..9,Q.....
s22,?50.00
s26,320. 00
$9,660.00
s3.312.00
91,300.00
$700. 00
s10,248.00
9280. 00
9485.00
$5.00
364.00
511.00
402.00
947. 00
4.00
2.00
30.00
170. 00
1 6.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
104
108
116
80
100
107
r2l
78
0
0
0
0
0
00t
121
52C
3{r
00$
00t
14t
43t
35r
00s
003
00r
00s
00t
$23, 660. 00
928. 61 6. 00
911,256.00
s3,157.60
$1,0{o.oo
$700.00
910,980.00
$340. 00
9380. 00
s0-00
s0.00
s0.00
90.00
$0.00
980,129 -60
923, 660. 0o
$28,6),6,00
s11,256.00
93, 157 . 60
$1,040.00
s700. 00
I 1 0, 980. 00
934 0. 00
9380. 00
90.00
s0,00
s0. 00
s0. 00
s0. 00
90.00
90. 00
90. 00
90.00
s0.00
s0.00
s0.00
s0.00
90. 00
s0.00
90.00
90.00
90. 00
376:s.E
9600. 00
925. 00
9595. 00
$752. 00
971.032.00
90. 00
s0.00
i
CHANGE ORDERS:
CCO 1 ; EXTEND PAVING LIMITS e THICKNESS
CCO 2 : ADDING LEVELING COURSE BETIIEEN MAJILA & NORTH LN
Cco3 : 8. solid Line -- ThelDoplastic
: {" Solid Line -- Thelnoplastic
:12" sol-id Line -- Thelnoplastic
: Parking Tees -- thelnopLaslic
: Legends & Alrffs -- Thernoplastic
: Legends & Arr@s -- Thelnoplastic
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
BROAD}'AY INTB,SEC?ION TOTAI :
: ORIGINAL BID :
::::::
95
915
ss
9s
96
43
15
'70
49
49
1, 915 :
62 1
3,430 :
L47 |
1,037 : s. F
1,037 : s. F
CHANGE ORDERS
s80 129 .60
$669,797. 00 s 819 4?4.80 9819,4?4.80 s0.00
L.F
L.F
L.F
$ 150. 000. 00
$3{ . 200. 00
95, 668. 4 0
$336.66
I 10, 804 . 50
92,307 .90
95,693,13
95,693.13
232
350
703
L41
46'1
514
00
00
00
00
00
00
168
564
137
100
141
49
0
77S
52t
11t
00s
4',7 \
57t
00t
59,566.72
s1,9oo.5o
914, B1{ .45
92,30?.90
s8,053.83
92,821.86
939 , t65.26
99, 5 66
91.900
914, 814
92,301
$8,053
92,821
$39,469
'12
50
45
90
83
86
26
s0.00
$0.00
s0.00
$0. 00
s0. 00
$0. 00
EACH
703
$0.00
s85,894.01
985,894.01
s0. 00
s eptenlcer- 2 3 - 02 SUBTOTAL
LESS TEN PERCENT RETENTION
$858,940.06
s0.00
$858,940.06
_--_!'_r_'_'_r-'_r__'l]
9773,0{6.05
s0. 00
APPROVED BY
CITY ENGINEER:
SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS
AMOUNT DU8 EROM CONTRACTOR
$858,940.06
s0.00
APPROVED BY
CONSULTANT:
S/amCWXoffiC]w/rem/eet /BDrcPArefr /fu64@3eI, ffi -l@P.F.d2)
TOTAL THIS PERIOD 9858,940.06 9?73,046.05 $8s, s94. 01
:
$110.00 :
9170.00 :
9170. 00 :
$57.00:
$54-00 :
s28, 00 :
92.',70 t
90.80 :
9350. 00 :
9260. 00 :
9360. 00 :
92. 00 :
$5. 00 :
$0.50 :
$1.00 :
$2.50 :
$1.40 :
96.00 :
s2.00 :
935. 00 :
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBIVIITTED
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE 10.7
OF PROCEDURE
8e
DATE 30,2002
APPROVED
FROM:CITY
SUBIECT: APPROVE REVISION TO PLANNING COMMISSION
BY
BY
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council should take action. It is required that the City Council review and approve any changes to the
planning Commission's Rules of Procedure. These rules govern the operation of the Commission.
Planning Commission Action
At the pianning Commission meeting on Septemb er 9,2002,the Commission reviewed and approved the
changes to thelr standing rules of prJcedure. The commissioners took action on a 7-0 voice vote. (Planning
Commission Minutes (September 9, 2002).
BACKGROUND:
In May ZOol, the planning Commission completed a major review of their Rules of Procedure. One issue
noted was the importance of t..p the rules current. Since May 2001, the Commission has added commercial
design review. in addition, because of the public comment opportunity that the design review process
inclides, we have been using the process devised for design review for environmental scoping. This
expansion of the use of the proiedurai format needs to be incorporated into the Rules of Procedure.
The proposed changes are shown by highlighting on the attached Section V of the Rules of Procedure. The
are:o Add Call to Order to the listing of items in the Regular Meeting. (V,A 1)
o Add direction regarding public participation for regular study, consent calendar and design
review. (V, D 2)
o Clarify tirai theie is no input from the public during the regular study meeting. (V, D)
o Clarify when items can bi scheduled on the agenda directly to action' (V, D)
o Clarify that a commission can vote on a administrative application even if s/he was absent if
slhe has listened to an audio or video tape of the item before voting' (M)
The full text of the amended Rules of Procedure are attached at the end of the staffreport for you reference.
Attachments:
Resolution
Planning Commission Minutes, September 9, 2002
Planning Commission Minutes, August 12,2002
emendJd Rules of Procedure of the Planning Commission, changes highlighted
1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OX'BURLINGAME APPRO\ING A REVISION TO
TITE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, pursuantto Burlingame Municipal Code $ 3.40.030, the Planning Commission
has proposed a revision to its Rules of Procedure and forwarded it to the City Council for approval;
and
WHEREAS, the design review process needs to be integrated into the Rules of Procedure
as well as minor changes to confirm current practice; and
WHEREAS, the revision to the Rules of Procedure conforms to State and City law and is
consistent with City policies for conducting meetings and receiving public testimony,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve,
determine, and find as follows:
1. The revision to the Rules of Procedure for the Planning Commission attached hereto
as Exhibit A is approved.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City ofBurlingame do hereby certi$r that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COI.INCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
a
1
City of Burtingome Planning Commission Approved Minutes September 9, 20A2
whole building be lowered as a result of grading in the side yard; will the slope on the driveway changg might
be good to lower the whole building, less impalt on the neighbor's; want plans to show the building as it will
be built.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item until revised plans with requested
information have been prepared, submitted, checked by staffand noticed for another public hearing' The
motion passed on a z-o r,,ojice vote. This item is not appealable. The item concluded at 9:05 p.m'
6. 819-849 & 863 MTTTEN ROAD -zoNEDo.M.APPLICATIONFoRANAMENDMENTToTHE
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM (CLAIRE WILDE,SIGN CLASSICS, APPLICANT; ALEXA}.{DRIA REAL
Reference staffreport , g.ag.oz,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staffcomments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff'
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Claire wilde, Srgn Classics, was present to answer questions' She
noted that the applicants are eager to purin the new signs and they are currently upgrading the signage at all
their properti"r.
'Th"r" *"r" ro further comments and the public hearing was closed'
Chair Keigl,an noted that is unusual to see an applicant come in with a reduction in signage, noting that in
this case the new sign area complied with the current sign code area and moved to approve the applicatiorl by
resolution, with the following conditions: l) that the signs shall be installed as shown on the plans submitted
to the planning Department *d dut" stamped Jtiry 26,1002, (site plan and elevations |Yz" x 11"); including
an illuminat rJdz4,-5u x l,-10,, wall sign and an illuminated two-sided 8" x 4'-0" shingle sign (per side) and
there shall be no window or other signage on the site; 2) that any increase in the number, qpe, or area ofthe
signs on the sites, shall require * *"nd*ent to the master sign program; and 3) that the project shall meet
all the requirements of the municipal code and of the 1998 edition California Building and Fire Codes as
amended 6y the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C' Auran'
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote'
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:13 p.m.
7,UPDA TE RULES URES
Reference staffreport , g.og.}z,with attachments. cP Monroe presented the report. commissioner asked
what is the difference between an administrative application and an administrative hearing. CA Anderson
stated that they were basically the same thing. rt ai ialls under the Brown Act. There are different levels of
noticing required.
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the public hearing was closed'
C. Boju6s moved to recommend the proposed changes to_the Planning Commission's rules of procedure
to city council, by resolution. The motion was seconded by c. Keele.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to City Council. The motion passed on a
7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9.20 p-m'
7
August 12, 2002
C i ty of Burl ingam e P lonnin g C om m i s s i on M inu le s
5.
6.
ll,zooz,memos shall be met; 4) that the portions ofthe basement that are shown with a 5'-1 I " ceiling height
shall have a ceiling height of no greato it* 5'-11o, that these portions shall be back-filled with a cement
floor; and that the ceilii'g height in these areas shall never be increased to greater than 5'-11" and that these
areas shall never be made into or used as habitable space; 5) that the project shall comply with the proposed
demolition and construction recycling ordinance ricently approved by the City Council; and 6) that the
project shall meet all the requirementJor*r" CaliforniaBuilding Code and CalifomiaFireCodg 1998 editiorl
as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C' Keele'
Chair Keigtran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Boju6s
absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:38 p'm'
Reference staffreport g.lz.}L,with attachments. cP Monroe presented the report. commissioners noted
that maybe staff could prepare an overhead to be on when the meeting starts to direct members of the
audience to the handout on Commission procedure available at the door; regarding item V, D, 2look at
wording, as written it implies that all environmental scoping sessions include design review; on item rv c ifa
commissioner is absent at study, is it sufficient for him/trer to just read the minutes of the previous meeting
before #6e can vote at action or must they listen to the tape, whichever it is, the rules of procedure should be
corrected.
C. Vistica moved that this item be continued to the next meeting for clarification. The motion was seconded
by C. Osterling.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C. Boju6s
absent). This item concluded at7:46 p.m-
1137-1145 PALOMA AYEI\IUE _ ZON-ED R.3 - APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE, VARTANCE FOR DWELLING UMTS IN THREE
BUILDINGS ON ONE LOT, AI.ID CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW THREE (3) STORY,
TWELVE (12) UNrr RESTDENTTAL CONDOMTNTIIM (DALE MEYE& DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES'
APPL1CANT A}ID ARCHITECT; FU.LEN CHENG, PROPERTY OWNER) (7S NOTICED) PROJECT
a. Variances And Condominium Permit
b. Tentative And Final Parcel Map For Lot Merger And Tentative Condominium Map
Reference staffreport g.lz.oz,with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and
planning Department comments. Forty-seven conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission
commented that in the prerio.rs plans for the project there were four 9' x 20'uncovered parking stalls
provided at the rear of tire site and now there ur" orty three spaces, one of which has the dimensions of a
iir*t"a accessible parking stall, why did this change? Planning staffnoted that the architect double-checked
with the city's chieiBuildLg oincia (cBo) and verified that a disabled accessible space is required lor the
largerconrmon open space irovided. The ChiefBuilding official noted that this space is not required to be
exJlusively labeled u, o airubt"d accessible space. commission noted a concern with the parking impact on
businesses and residents in the area during construction, currently there is construction on Broadway for the
Broadway Streetscape program, consttction employees for this project should be directed to park
4
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OT'THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
I. Purpose.
These Rules of Procedure are adopted pursuant to Burlingame Municipal Code $
3.40.030 to guide proceedings before the Commission.
Offices. There will be a Chair, a Vice Chair, and a Secretary
Term of ffice. Eachofficer of the Commission will serve for a one-year term and
hold office until the officer's successor is rotated to the office, or the
Commissioner's term as Commissioner ends, whichever occurs first.
Rotation of fficers. Officers will be rotated at the Commission's first regular
meeting in May of each year. The rotation order is as follows:
1. Vice Chair becomes Chair.
2. Secretary becomes Vice Chair
3. Commissioner who is not an officer, who has served the longest period of time
on the Commission, and who has not yet served as Chair becomes Secretary.
4. If two or more Commissioners have the same length of service on the
Commission are eligible trnder subpart C above, then the Secretary shall be
chosen from among them bl
lrandom
draw.
5. If all Commissioners who are not then officers have served as Chair making
subparagraph (3) inapplicable, then the Secretary shall be the Commissioner
whose service as Chair was the most distant in time.
6. A Commissioner eligible under this subpart may decline to serve, in which case
the next Commissioners in the rotation process shall be rotated to the offices
affected.
Vacancies. If an office becomes vacant during the year, rotations for that office
shall be made as provided in subpart (C) above at the next regular meeting of the
Commission following the occurence of the vacancy. The persons rotated to new
offices when such a vacancy occurs shall serve the balance of the one-year term for
il Officers.
A.
B.
C.
D
IProposed onl0l7l2002
A. Duties of the Chair. The Chair performs the following duties:
1. Presides at all meetings of the Commission.
2. Signs correspondence on behalf of the Commission.
3. Represents the Commission before the City Council.
4. Performs other duties necessary or customary to offrce of the Chair.
Duties of the Vice Chair. In the event of the absence, disability, or disqualification
of the Chair to act as Chair, the Vice Chair performs the duties of the Chair.
C. Duties of the Secretary. The Secretary performs the following duties
1. Executes resolutions of the Commission.
2. ln the event of the absence, disability, or disqualification of the Chair and the
Vice Chair to act as Chair, the Secretary performs the duties of the Chair.
Absence of fficers. If none of the three (3) elected officers are able to perform the
duties of Chair because of absence, disability, or disqualification, the remaining
Commissioners shall elect one of themselves to act as temporary Chair.
Committees and subcommittees. The Commission, or the Chair with the
authorization of the Commission, may create committees or subcommittees to
study or advise the Commission on matters within the jurisdiction of the
Commission. These committees or subcommittees may be composed of
Commissioners or members of the public, or both, so long as fewer than a quonrm
of the Commission serve on the committee or subcommittee. Such committees or
subcommittees shall be advisory only to the Commission and shall oirect all
communications to only the Commission.
III. Types and Places of Meetings
Regular meetings. Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held on the
second and fourth Mondays of each month at7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Hall. The Commission may cancel a regular meeting, or may
schedule a regular meeting at a different date and time or place within the City.
The Commission may also adjoum or continue a meeting to such date as the
Commission may determine.
B
D
E.
A.
Proposed onl0l7l2002 -2-
the offices; however, if the office that was vacant is the Chair and the term
remaining is less than 6 months, then the rotated offrcers shall serve the balance of
the term plus an additional one-year term.
B
C.
A.
Special meetings. A special meeting of the Commission may be held at a time and
place within the City as may be determined by a vote of the Commission or by call
of the Chair.
Study sessions. The Commission may hold a study session on any application or
planning issue at any regular or special meeting of the Commission.
IV. Quorum and Voting
B.
C.
D
l/
E.
Quorum. Four Commissioners, a majority of the membership of the Commission,
constitutes a quorum for purposes of conducting any business of the Commission.
However, a meeting may be continued to a new date and time with less than a
quonrm present at a regular or special meeting of the Commission.
Vote required. Unless otherwise required by State law, official action of the
Commission requires the affirmative vote of a majority the Commissioners present,
and never less than three (3). Abstentions and disqualifications do not count as
affirmative votes.
Eligibility to vote. A Commissioner shall be eligible to svote on an adminilsfratlve
application even though the Commissioner was absent from a prior hearing on the
same application if the Commissioner has listened to the audiotape or if available,
the videotape of that prior hearing. A Commissioner is eligible to vote on a
procedural matter or legislative recommendation regardless of the Commissioner's
attendance at a prior discussion or hearing, without having listened to a tape of the
prior proceeding, and to vote at an administrative
Commissioner was absent from a prior study
Manner of voting. Votes may be taken by voice vote or roll call at the discretion of
the Chair. Any Commissioner may request a roll call vote, which shall then be
taken. No votes shall be by secret ballot.
Effect of a tie vote- A tie vote defeats a motion. Unless a subsequent motion is
made and adopted, a tie vote on the merits of a planning application before the
Commission means a denial of the application. When acting on a recommendation
to the Council on legislation, the Commission may forward the results of its
discussion to the Council although the Commission was unable to reach a majority
vote on a specific recommendation.
Proposed onl0/7D0A2 -J-
V. Order of business
A.Regular meeting. The usual order of business at a regular meeting of the
Commission will be:
2. Roll Call.
3. Approval of minutes of previous meetings.
4. Review of agenda.
5. Public Comment period for study items and items not appearing on the meeting
agenda.
6. Items for study
7. Consent calendar #dffi;j
8. Items for public hearing or action, or both.
I
9
ffiions
I 0. City Planner/Committee/Subcommittee Reports
:i# Adjoumment.
Special meetings. Special meetings of the Commission will usually be limited to a
few agenda items, and the agenclas will be developed around those items, but will
include a public comment period before action is taken on any item.
Change in agenda order. With the consent of the Commission, the Chair may
change the order of any agenda item for the convenience of the public or the
Commission.
D. Study items
l. Study items are usually presented at a meeting for
review by the Planning Commission for questions to provide staffand the
to better
B.
C
Proposed onlAfi2002
with an
-4-
for the on the item.
under Chapter
Commission.
25.57 or
Planner
to action at a
if the
approvals
During
of the
not
application on an agenda as a study item
eontro\remyor substantial questions
R-l District
i),ra:'. | .'.:".:::':.::::::- :'::1: .):::::'::t'L:.:!::l \
design review;l',, iillD" llesi
whether they include other
or not, are considered under a separate study
such a study item, the applicant and other interested persons may comment on the
application and the Commission may ask questions of the applicant and other
interested persons . Unlike other these Rffiesigrmeview
are noticed und€r City procedures. Following eaelrffietr
desipaciriew study item, the Commission
will determine whether to refer the application to the design review professional
E"Consent calendar. Items are placed on the consent calendar because either the City
Planner believes that they have little or no controversy or the Commission has
directed their placement on the consent calendar for faster consideration and
approval. However, an item will be removed from the consent calendar if:
1. Any interested person requests in writing before the Commission meeting
that the item be removed from the consent calendar for hearing.
2. During the public comment period, any interested person requests that the
item be removed from the consent calendar.
3. Any commissioner requests that the item be removed from the uoiisent
calendar.
Any person or commissioner may ask a question regarding an item on the consent
calendar, and the Chair at the Chair's sole discretion may decide whether to allow a
response to the question or to proceed to remove the item from the consent
calendar and hold a hearing on the item. Any item removed from the consent
calendar will normally be heard during the public hearing calendar on that
evening's agenda in the same order as set on the agenda.
Proposed onl0/712002 -5-
The an
believes that the
VI. Continuances and appearances by applicants
Requests for continuqnces. At any time, any person may request the Commission
to continue any item to a fufure meeting, and an applicant may request the
applicant's application to an indefinite date or a future meeting on a showing of
good cause.
Commission dtscretion The Commission shall have sole discretion to determine
whether to grant the requested continuance after considering the reasons for the
request, the effect on the applicant and interested persons, and State and City laws
governing the application.
C.General policy toward applicant requests. Generally, the Commission will grant a
first request for a continuance by an applicant, but no applicant should assume that
such a request will be granted and should appear at the scheduled time in support
of the request.
Determination on continuance. Approval of continuance requests require a vote of
the Commission. Any continuance and the proposed noticing for the continued
hearing, if any, should be announced by the Chair or City Planner.
Costs of renoticing. The applicant shall pay the costs of providing any notice
required or ordered by the Commission on a continuance requested by the
applicant.
VII. Failure of applicant to appear
A. Action by Commission. lf an applicant does not appear at the time set for public
hearing on the applicant's application, the Commission may continue the* iapplication, drop the application from the agenda, or proceed to hear and take
action on the item.
Payment of costs. The applicant shall pay the costs of providing any notice
required or ordered by the Commission when an application is continued or
dropped from an agenda because the applicant did not appear at the hearing on the
application.
VIII. Public hearing process
A.Order. The following process will usually be followed on items set for public
hearing:
A.
B
D
E.
Proposed an1017/2002 -6-
B.
/\
B.
C.
D.
l. Chair will call the item for hearing. If the hearing procedure has not already
been described by the Chair at that meeting, the Chair will tell the audience
what the general procedure for the hearing will be.
2. Any Commissioners with a potential conflict of interest will declare the
potential conflict and disqualifr themselves from participation. Any
Commissioners who have visited the site of the application or received any
information outside the record will state that information.
3. City staff will present a report on the matter and respond to questions from the
Commission, and the Commission may indicate any aspects of the application
on which the Commission would like additional information or comments.
4. The applicant, if any, will present any additional information or testimony not
provided in the staff report, respond to the staff report, and respond to
questions from the Commission.
5. Any other interested persons may present any additional information or
testimony not provided by the staffreport or the applicant, and respond to
questions from the Commission. Interested persons are encouraged not to
repeat testimony that has already been presented. If a person wants to simply
affirm that he or she agrees with a previous speaker, the person should do so.
6. After all interested persons have been given the opportunity to speak, the
applicant may respond to any comments by interested persons, make a
concluding statement, and respond to questions from the Commission. The
concluding statement should be made by a single person, unless there are
compelling reasons for technical responses by more than one expert.
7. The Chair will close the public hearing.
8. The Commission will discuss the application and take such action as may be
appropriate.
Deferral to Chair. All comments and questions by both Commissioners and the
audience are directed to and through the Chair.
IdentiJication of persons giving evidence. All persons giving testimony shall
identifr themselves by name and address.
Time limitations. The Chair may limit the time for presentation of testimony by
each person, and in any event, it is expected that no person, except for the
applicant, shall testiff longer than five (5) minutes. However, the Chair may
Proposed onl0l7l2002 -7-
extend this time period if the person is making a combined presentation on behalf
of a large number of persons. The applicant shall be expected to present a brief
overview of the project and respond to pending questions and concerns in no more
than fifteen (15) minutes; at the conclusion of the public hearing, the applicant's
response should be no longer than five (5) minutes.
Multiple oppeqrances. Except for the applicant and responses by staff, no person
shall be allowed to testifr more than once during a hearing unless the Chair
determines that the person's second testimony will provide vital information to the
Commission that has not already been presented.
Effect of hearing closure. After closure of the public hearing, the Commission will
not receive any additional evidence unless the hearing is reopened by the Chair
with the consent or vote of the Commission. However, the Commissionlmaygask6X p1g1 llll I
the applicant for consent to specific conditions on the application or for .
clarification by the staff without reopening the public hearing.
Control of proceedings. The Chair may direct any speaker to end or move on with
testimony if the testimony is repetitive of matters already presented or is irrelevant
to the application before the Commission.
Decorum. Hearings before the Commission are held under informal rules of
evidence and are intended to promote the interests of the community. Personal
attacks and attempts to intimidate citizens, whether applicants or interested
citizens, are strongly discouraged and will be ruled out-of-order.
Deliberations. Commissioners shall not reach any conclusion on an application
before the close of the public hearing. The determination of the Commission is to
be based on the record presented to the Commission as well as the Commissioners'
experience and knowledge of the community. Commissioners are responsible for
making their best efforts to articulate the reasons for their determination are
discussed on the record and findings made as discussed below.
IX. Submission of written materials
Written submission encouraged. Interested persons are encouraged to submit
written materials for Commission consideration prior to the public hearing on the
item. This saves time aj the hearing and better focuses the discussion and
testimony.
E
F
G
H.
I.
A.
Proposed on1017/2042 -8-
t,
Timeliness. In order to be included in the packet provided to the Commission
before the hearing, written materials must be provided to the City Planner no later
than ten (10) days before the public hearing.
Late submission.Written materials may also be presented to the City Planner for
Commission consideration at a later time up to the close of the public hearing.
Number of copies if submitted late. If witten materials are provided by the
applicant at the hearing itself, the presenter is expected to provide at least 8 copies,
so that each commissioner and the City Planner will each have a copy. If any other
person presents written materials, the presenter is expected to provide nine copies
so that the applicant may also have a copy for review.
Retention of submittals. Photographs, story boards, and other lmge presentation
materials may be provided in only one original without copies, but these materials
are required to be left with the City Planner for record purposes and will not be
returned for an extended period of time.
X. Receipt of information outside the public proceeding
Site visits. It is expected that Commissioners will visit the site of a proposed
project on an individual basis. Although not expected or required, individual
commissioners may discuss or meet with the applicant or other interested persons,
but in no event shall any commissioner commit to a particular vote or decision
before the close of the public hearings on that item. It is important to remember
that Commissioners are responsible for ensuring the actual integrity of the process
and the public's confidence in that process by being even-handed to all interested
persons.
Ilisclosure. Any discussion with the applicant or any interested person shall be
summarized by the individual commissioners prior to the staffreport on the item.
XI. Findings
Generally. Findings are the means by which the statutory and ordinance
requirements are tied to the specific facts of an application. Applicants are
expected to provide the Commlssioh with proposdd findirigs that justi$lthd
approval of the application under relevant law and policy.
B
C.
D.
E.
B.
A.
B
A.
r | illl r
Motions- tn making motions for approval or denial, Commissioners may
incorporate the findings outlined in the reports of staffand proposed findings
offered by applicants or other interested persons, as well as articulating their own
Proposed onl0l7/20A2 -9-
findings that allow the City Council and the public to understand how the decision
was reached.
C.Addittonal preparqtion. If the complexity or breadth of a particular application
requires extensive findings, the Commission may request staff to prepare written
findings in accordance with Comrmissionldisqussion foqlreview and possible
adoption at a subsequent meeting.
XI. Denial without prejudice
Effect. The Commission may deny an application without prejudice, which means
that the applicant may submit a similar application atany time in the future for
consideration by the City.
Reasons given. In making the denial without prejudice, the Commission or
individual commissioners may provide the applicant with suggestions on how the
application might be redone to address the concerns raised at the public hearing.
However, none of those suggestions shall be interpreted as binding in any way on
any future review or action by the City regarding that property or any other
property.
XII. Appeals
Following a final decision of the Commission, the Chair will announce the rights of appeal
of the decision as established by the Municipal Code and Council resolutions. Persons interested
in appealing a decision should contact the Planning Department the next business day to make
sure that the appeal process, fees, and time requirements are understood. Normally, an appeal
must be frled by the end of the next City Council meeting, which is usually only seven (7) days
after the Commission decision.
XIII. Relationship with Council, Other Boards and Commissions, and Public
Council communications. The principal source of communication with the
Council is through Commission minutes. Direct communication on behalf of the
Commission should be directed through the Chair or the City Planner. With the
consent of the Commission, other Commissioners may be authorized to represent
the Commission before the Council.
B.Requests to other Boards and Commissions. Because the Commission is advisory
to the Council, requests for information from or for review by other City boards
and commissions should be directed to the Council for approval.
A.
B.
A.
Proposed onl0l7D0A2 -10-
Communications with the public. Public statements on behalf of the Commission
should be approved by the Commission before release.
XIV. Requests for Staff Information
Generol policy. lndividual Commissioners may request additional information
from staffmembers to assist in their analysis of applications. However, this
information is to be provided to all Commissioners.
Limitations. Individual Commissioners should not request staffmembers to
prepare information that will consume significant amounts of time without
consulting with the City Engineer or City Planner, as appropriate. The better
procedure is to make such a request at a meeting of the Commission.
XV. Effect of the Rules of Procedure
These rules of procedure are intended to provide the basic guidelines for the conduct of
Commission business. Any failure to follow a specific provision of these rules shall not be
grounds for overturning any decision or action of the Planning Commission nor shall any
improper admission or rejection of evidence or any other error, irregularity, informality, neglect,
or omission as to any matter pertaining to any matter before the Commission, unless the misstep
was prejudicial and that the party complaining or appealing suffered substantial injury from that
error and that a different result would have been probable if the error had not occurred. There
shall be no presumption that the misstep was prejudicial or that injury was done if the misstep is
shown.
C :\FILES\PIanning\PC Rules\PCUpdate902. ccr.wpd
C
xr'
A.
B.
Proposed onl0l7/2002 -11-
a
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM #
MTG.
DATE
10t7 to2
8f
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
August 20,2OO2 BY
PUBLIC WORKS
OCTOBER 29, 2OO2 SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
TRANSPORTATIO N AUTHORITY
H SAN MATEO COUNTY
BY
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council set a special study session with the San Mateo County
Transportation Authority for October 29,2002, at 7:00 p.m. in Conference Room A.
DISCUSSION: Over the last year, Council has indicated a desire to meet with representatives of the San Mateo
County Transportation Authority to discuss various projects under their responsibility which affect Burlingame.
As a result, Howard Goode, Chief Development Officer, and his staff have consented to making a presentation
to Council on the status of the following projects:
. Bayshore Freeway Auxiliary Lanes Improvements
. Broadway Interchange Improvements. Caltrain's station and platform improvements at Burlingame Avenue and at Broadway. Caltrain's current construction including third rail installation, tie replacement and crossing signals
replacement
Council has also indicated a desire to discuss with the Authoritythe approach for grade separating Caltrain tracks
and street crossings within Burlingame to accommodate a possible future "bullet" train.
EXHIBITS: None
BUDGET IMPACT: None.
City Clerk
Howard Goode, SMCTA
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\SMCTA Spcl Snrdy Sess.wpd
c
m D
n,I
.SFP 1 9 200?
AGENDA
ITEM#
MTG.
DATE I .02
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SIIB]I{ITTED
DATE:MBER 30.2002
APPROVEI)
X'ROM: CITY
SUB.IECT:APPROVE COOPERATTVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN TEO COUNTY TO
AD MINISTER THE REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM FOR BURLINGAME AS A
PART OF THE COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM.
RECOMMENDATION:
city co,rr"il should take action by adopting a resolution approving the cooperative agreement. Affirmative
action would allow San Mateo County to administer the Federally funded Housing Rehabilitation Loan
program forBurlingame until the City of Burlingame decides to withdraw . As a non-entitlement city,
Burlingame cannot receive this funding directly from the Federal government, this agreement avoids us
having to adopt an authorizing agreement every three years. Failure to adopt an agreement means ineligibility
for participation in the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program.
BACKGROUND:
Communities in the country which have 50,000 population or greater have been designated by the Federal
government to be entitlement cities and received social service grant funds directly from the Federal
government. Those cities which have less population than 50,000 (non-entitlement cities) can qualify for
these funds by joining with the county anaine other smaller cities in their county. Burlingame has participated
with San Mateo County in this funding since the 1970's'
In July 1993, Burlingame adopted an agreemery yJh San Mateo County which automatically renewed our
participation with sai Mateo iounty initre Federally funded community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program. The county is now requesting that we adopt a similar agreement for participation in, and their
administration of, the Federally funded Rehabilitation Loan Program'
STAFF REPORT
In April of 1997 the city renewed its cooperative agreement with the County for administration and
management of the Rehabilitation Loan p.og.u.. th. R.hubilitation Loan Program is the most used by
Burliigame residents of the SDBG p.ogrurn-r and has been effectively administered for the city by the County
for deiades. Adoption of this agreement will relieve the city of having to renew our administrative agreement
with San Mateo County every ii*.. y."rr. Under the terms of the agreement the City of Burlingame may
withdraw from the ugr."*"nt at any time. Withdrawal will mean that city residents will no longer be eligible
for Federally funded rehabilitation loans.
Rehabilitation loans were cited in the Housing Element with the second unit amnesty program as a tool
available to lower income residents for bringiecognized second units up to safe and sanitary standards. There
is also a program for low-to-no interest loans to property owners of multiple family rental buildings which
encourages them to bring these properties up to code while keeping their rents competitive.
8g
TO:BY
BY
ri?t
,ANNNR
''i
APPROW COOPERATIYE AGREEMENT WTH SAN MATEO COUNTY TO ADMINISTER THE REHABILITATION
LOAN PROGRAM FOR BARLINGALIE AS A PART OF THE COMMANITY DEWLOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRA-DI
Odober 7' 2002
Attachments
Resolution
Agreement between County of San Mateo (Human Services Agency OfIice of Housing) and City of
Burlingame for Rehabilitation Loan Program Services, July 2002.
a
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
O['THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR REHABILITATION LOAN
PROGRAM SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURIINGAME AND
THE COTJNTY OF SAN MATEO
RESOLYED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the County of San Mateo have established a
cooperative program for provision of rehabilitation loans to assist in the repair and rehabilitation of
the City's housing; and
WIIEREAS, the County is willing to continue to provide these services under the
Community Development Block Grant Program and assist in fuithering the goals of the Housing
Element of the City's General Plan,
NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:
l. The City Council hereby approves the Agreement for Rehabilitation Loan Program
Services with the County of San Mateo, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2. T\e Mayor is authorized and requested to execute the Agreement on behalfof and for the
City.
3. The City Clerk is requested and directed to attest the signature of the Mayor.
MAYOR
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City of Burlingame, do hereby certifuthatthe
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _dayoL,2002,andwasadoptedthereafterbythefollowingvote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
C:\FILES\RESO\CDBGREHA.PLN
CITY CLERK
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
GII.JMAN SERVICES AGENCY
oFFrcE oF HOUSTNG)
AND
CITY OFBURLINGAME
FOR REIIABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM SERVICES
g Our .p"(\a
?
\
C')
oq q
e)e 0o
F'a ervices
HSA Contact Person:
HCD Specialists
Norman Pascoe: (650) 802-5008
LDJohnson: (650) 802-5002
st"
///_
\N
fr'ill
FIWPWN(NrcD\II Rclubboop agreernen$\R"EHAB BurringarE COOP-wpd
forB rey. July 24, 2002
(s
a
5.
(,
a
a
...
Ir rl ri
AGREEMENT BETWEEN COT]NTY OF SAN MATEO,
AND
CITY OFBI.JRLINGAME
FOR RETIABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM SERVICES
TIIIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
2002, by and between the city of Burlingame, hereinafter referred to as "ci[y'', and the county ofsan
Mateo, hereinafter referred to as 'COLINTY'.
WTINESSEfiI
WTINESSETH, the Housing and Comrnunity Development Act of 1974, public Law 93-3g3,
e,nacted August 22, 1974, and the Housing and communigr Development Act of 1927, public Law 95-
128, enacted October 12, 1977, both provide for the dishibution of licderal funds through the process of
conununitSr development block grants to eligible public entities; and
WHEREAS, a Cooperation Agreerrent by and between City and County establishing the formal
relationship to cooperative and co-participants in the Urban County Corrmunity Development Block
Grant Pmgram, was entered into by County md City on July 13, 1993 and was automatically renewed
on July l, 2002 for federal fiscal yans2@243,2003-O4 and 2004-05; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 51300 et seq ofthe Govemment Code, the
Board of Supervisors of the County may contract with the City, and the City Cormcil of the City may
conhact with the County for the performance of the City functions by the appropriate olficers and
employees of the County and
WIIEREAS, the City desires the Cormgr to perform the Housing Rehabilitation Ioan Program
services hereinafter set forth for and on behalfofthe City within the t€rritorial limits ofsaid Crty and
the County is willing to perform such services; and
NOW, THEREFORE ITIS HEREBYAGREEDBYT}IEPARTIES HER3TO AS FOIIOWS:
A. -PTJRPOSEOFAGREEMENT
The purpose of this Agreernent is to set forth the respective duties and responsibilities of the
County and the City with respect to the City's rehabilitation loan program.
B. SERVICESBYTHECOUNTY
I The County agrees, tlrough its Director ofthe OIEce ofHousin& to perform the housing
rehabilitation finctions ofthe City as specified in subsections 2 and 3 of Section B.
Financial Services: The County agrees to provide housing rehabilitation financing
services under the following categories:
(l) Housing rehabilitation loans originated and packaged by San Mateo
Count5r for very low and low income homeowners:
- ftlly amortized loans; or
- hardship deferred loans
2.
a-
F:\WPWtrtI6OIfDLDnRdtabtmp.gr!6!crt3\REHAB Burtinprnc@Op.*pd
farntev. luly 24,2@2 Pegc I of 5
@ Housing rehabilitation loans origi4ated and packaged by the County for
the investor/owners where very low and low income tenants reside.
b. The County shall be responsible, either through its offices or an appropriate
lender, for the loan documentation including but not limited to:
(l) Installment Note
@ Deed of Trust
(3) Compliance wi'h Regulation .8" of the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity
Act and Regulations 'Z'of the Federal Tmth-in_knding Act
(4) State of Califomia Fair Lending Notice
c. The County shall meet with property owner for the purpose of gathering data
and/or sipature on the loan documents.
d. The Cormty shall arrange for the bank serviccs, including collection of loan
accounts, loan delinquency counseling and/or foreclosure procedures.
Technical services: The county agrees to provide Housing Rehabilitation Technical
Services as follows:
a Request services ofa licensed strucfural pest conhol service on case by case
basis to be paid by owrer.
b. Provide owner with work specilications to correct the items identified in the pest
conhol or any health or safety hazards idortified by the County.
c. V€riry State licensing status ofcontractor selected by the owner.
d. Organizeandconduct'pr-econstructionconference.
e. Provide lending assistance p,rsuant to the duly adopted county rehabilitation
loan program.
f. Audit compliance with wort specifications.
C. Maintain cons&uction escrow account for all sums specified for payment in
escmw instructions.
h. Financing and technical services shall be performed during normal worting
hours. Said services shall be ofsuch nature and character as would be norially
required for housing rehabilitation under generally established and prevailing
practices.
J
FNVPWIN60\BCr LDJ\edEb\coop.grEriErts\REHAB BudingrrE COOp.e/pd
fctll tEv. ,uly 2,l, Z)02 Prge 2 of 5
t!
The County shall report to the City on an annual basis by luly 3ln ofeach yer,
the number of applications, and the amount of fimds committed for housing
rehabilitation services withit the City.
The County shall not replace the legal responsibilities and/or duties ofthe City
CAief Building Otrcial, in carrying out tasks under the Housing Rehabilitation
Program, as descn'bed below.
C. SUPPORTBYCITY
The City shall furnish the necessary support for the ouheach effort including ifneeded, the
following:
l. Provide space to disseminate rehabilitation program information.
2. Provide County with meeting and working space in order to facilitate coordination
between property o\ n€r, contractor, County, and related persorurel.
3. Provide the use ofa telephone for local calls.
ADMIMSTRATIVE E}(PENSES
I
The City will make no claim for administrative expenses to operate the Rehabilitation l,oan
Program.
E. SOURCE OFFI]NDS
The City recognizes and agrees that the County's expenses for administering the rehabilitation
loan program will be disbuned by the County from the Countywide firnd for the rehabilitation
loan program.
F. HOLD IIARMLESS
It is agreed that the County shall defend, indermifu and save hamrless the City, its olEcers,
agentq ernployees, and/or servants from all claims, suits, or actions ofevery name, kind and
description, brought for, or on accormt of, injuries and/or damag€s to persons and/or property
which arise out of the terms and conditions of this Ageemeirt and which result from the
negligent ac'ts and/or omissions of said County, its olficers, agents, eryloyees, and/or servants.
It is further ageed that the City shall defen{ indemniff and save harmless the County, its
officers, agents, employees, and/or servants from all claims, suits, or actions of every name,
kind and descriptioq brought for, or on account of, injuries and/or damages to persons and/or
property which arise out of the temrs and conditions of this Agreernent and which result from
the negligent acts and/or omissions of the City, its officers, agentq employees, and/or sewants.
FIWPWIM6HCf,ILD RdEb\coop.g'rcrrElls\REtlAB Budiogdrl COOP.wpd
fdm r!v- ruly 24, An2 Prge 3 of 5
J.
k.The County, in administering the rehabilitation project, shall comply with all
applicable regulations and processing requirements of City Deparhment of
Planning and Developmeirt Services.
D.
"'t
In the event of concurrent negligence of the County, its officers, agents, employees, and/or
servants and the City, its officers, agents, employees, and/or servants , the liability for any and
all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or property which arise out of the temrs and
conditions of this Agreement shall be apportioned under the California theory of comparative
neglige,nce as presently establishe4 or as maybe hereafter modified.
G. ALTERATIONOFAGREEMENT
This Agreement is entire and contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties.
No alteration or variation shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties he,reto,
and no oral understanding or agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto.
H. TERMOFTHEAGREEMBNT
The term of this Agreme,nt shall be for federal fiscal years 2002-03,2W3-0/- and 200405,
after which the term shall be automatically renewed unless action is taken by the County or the
Cityto terminate this Agreerre,nt
F:\WP\ilIN60\I{CD\tDr\Rchabboog agreenmts\REHAB Burlingarr COOP.wpd
fumre,r.luly24,20O2 Pege4of 5
IN WTINESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have
affixed their hands.
COT'NTY OF SAN MATEO
By:
JerryHill, President
Board of Supenisors
Date:
Attest:
Cleft of Said Board
Date:
CITY OF BURLINGAIvIE
By:
tTmt Name dg lrue
$gDahre
Date:
F:\WPWN60\tlCD\LDlRc*rabtoop agrcenrents\REHAB Burlinganr ClDOP.upd
fumran- llly24,2W)Pege5of 5
AGENDA
ITEM #8h
STAFF REPORT I\iITG,
DATE 10t7 t2002
TO Honorable Mavor and
DATE:Seotember 30.2002
BY
FROM:Larrv E. Anderson. CiW ttomev
UPDATE ON FINANCIAL INFORMATION PRIVACY ORDINANCES
S
BY
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Follow court rulings regarding the ordinances adopted by the City of Daly City and the County of San Mateo
and determine in January 2003, whether to pursue a similar ordinance in Burlingame.
DISCUSSION:
For the past2 years, Senator Speier has tried to convince the State Legislature to adopt some fundamental
regulatory controls on the manner in which financial institutions handle consumers' personal information.
Blocked by the banking industry and lacking the Governor's support, the legislation has failed twice. See
attached SB 773.
Foreseeing this result at the State level, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors and the Daly City City
Council have adopted separate and different ordinances that are similar to, but different from, Senator Speier's
proposal. While the banking industry opposed both ordinances, the Board of Supervisors and the City Council
moved forward with their legislation. See attached San Mateo County Ordinance and Daly City Ordinance No
1295. The ordinances would become effective on January T,2003. The City of Berkeley is reported to have
adopted or is considering similar legislation.
It is understood that a number of the largest banks in the area have now filed suit in Federal District Court
seeking to stop the legislation from going into effect. They have apparently alleged avariety of preemptions or
violations founded on Federal law. It is to be expected that the banks will use the full burden of discovery
demands that make attorney and court costs so expensive.
Meanwhile, various consumer groups and business interests are exploring the possibility of putting an initiative
on a statewide ballot in 2003 that would be even stricter in controlling personal information than any of the
ordinances or Senator Speier's proposal.
Staff recommends that the City watch the progress of the Federal court proceedings and the initiative petition.
The judge's rulings in the litigation will give everyone a good idea of the ability of a local agency to regulate
banking practices. Because the ordinances would not take effect in any event until January, we have time to see
Mayor and Council
Rei Update on Financial Information Privacy Ordinances
September 30,2002
Page 2
what the preliminary rulings are. While the San Mateo County ordinance may work as a "model" for others,
staff would need to understand and better define how any such ordinance would apply within and outside the
city limits. We would also have to consider a budget amendment to ensure funding for potential litigation.
Therefore, staff recommends reviewing this issue in the coming December or January.
Attachment
San Mateo County Ordinance/Staff Report
Daly City Ordinance
Senate B1ll773
20020806 o 8 Page 1 of7
ORDINANCE NO.
BOARD OF SUPERYISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
******
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL
CONSUMER INFORMATION BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, State of California, ORDAINS, as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 5.140, consisting of Sections 5.140.010 to 5.140.090, of Title 5 of the San
Mateo County Ordinance Code are hereby added as follows:
"5.140.010 Purpose and Intent
(a) It is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the operation of financial
institutions as defined in this ordinance should be regulated so as to provide customers of
financial institutions notice and meaningful choice about how their personal information is
shared or sold by their financial institutions.
(b) It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors in enacting this ordinance to afford persons greater
financial privacy protection than those provided in Public Law 106-102,the federal Gramm-
Leach-Bliley Act, and that this ordinance be interpreted to be consistent with that purpose.
5.140.020 Definitions
(a) "Confidential consumer information" means information (l) that a consumer provides to a
financial institution to obtain a product or service from the financial institution, (2) about a
consumsr resulting from any transaction involving a product or service between the financial
institution and a consumer, or (3) that the financial institution otherwise obtains about a
consumer in connection with providing a product or service to that consumer. Any personally
identifiable information is financial if it was obtained by a financial institution in connection
with providing a financial product or service to a consumer, including the fact that a
consumer is a customer of a financial institution or has obtained a financial product or service
from a financial institution. Confidential consumer information does not include publicly
available information that the financial institution has a reasonable basis to believe is
lawfully made available to the general public from (1) federal, state, or local government
records, (2) widely distributed media, or (3) disclosures to the general public that are required
to be made by federal, state, or local law. Confidential consumer information shall include
any list, description, or other grouping of consumers, and publicly available information
pertaining to them that is derived using any nonpublic personal information other than
publicly available information, but shall not include any list, description, or other grouping of
consumers, and publicly available information pertaining to them that is derived without
using any confidential consumer information.
(b) Confidential consumer information includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Information a consumer provides to a financial institution on an application to obtain a
loan, credit card, or other financial product or service.
(2) Account balance information, payment history, overdraft history and credit or debit
card purchase information.
(3) The fact that an individual is or has been a customer of a financial institution or has
obtained a financial product or service from a financial institution.
(4) Any information about a financial institution's consumer if it is disclosed in a manner
that indicates that the individual is or has been the financial institution's consumer.
(5) Any information that a consumer provides to a financial institution or that a financial
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806l20020... 0913012002
20020806_o_8 Page2ofT
institution or its agent otherwise obtains in connection with collecting on a loan or
, servicing a loan.
(6) Any information collected through an Internet cookie or an information collecting
device from a Web server.
(7) Information from a consumer report.
(c) "Financial institution" generally means any institution located in unincorporated San Mateo
County that engages in financial activities as described in Section 1843 (k) of Title 12 of the
United States Code and doing business in unincorporated San Mateo County. An institution
that is significantly engaged in financial activities is a financial institution. The term
"financial institution" does not include the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation or any
entity chartered and operating under the Farm Credit Act of l97l (12 U.S.C. Sec. 2001 et
seq.), provided that the entity does not sell or transfer confidential consumer information to a
nonaffiliated third party. The term "financial institution" does not include institutions
chartered by Congress specifically to engage in a proposed or actual securitization, secondary
market sale, including sales of servicing rights, or similar transactions related to a transaction
of the consumer, as long as those institutions do not sell or transfer confidential consumer
information to a nonaffiliated third party. The term financial institution does not include any
person licensed as a dealer under Article 1 (commencing with Section 11700) of Chapter 4 of
Division 5 of the Vehicle Code that enters into contracts for the installment sale or lease of
motor vehicles pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 2b (commencing with Section 2981)
or 2d (commencing with Section2985.7) of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code
and assigns substantially all of those contracts to financial institutions within 30 days. The
term "financial institution" does not include any provider of professional services, or any
wholly owned affiliate thereof, that is prohibited by rules of professional ethics or applicable
law from voluntarily disclosing confidential client information without the consent of the
client.
(d) "Affiliate" means any person or entity that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or
is under common control with another person or entity. A franchisor, including any affiliate
thereof, shall be deemed an affiliate of the franchisee for purposes of this ordinance.
(e) "Nonaffiliated third party" means any entity that is not an affiliate of, or related by common
ownership or affiliated by corporate control, with the financial institution.
(0 "Consumer" means an individual or business that obtains or has obtained, from a financial
institution as defined in subsection (c) above, a financial product or service that is to be used
primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or that individual's legal
representative. For purposes of this ordinance, an individual is not a consumer of a financial
institution solely because he or she is (1) a participant or beneficiary of an employee benefit
plan that a financial institution administers or sponsors, or for which the financial institution
acts as a trustee, insurer, or fiduciary, (2) covered under a group or blanket insurance policy
or group annuity contract issue by the financial institution, or (3) a beneficiary in a workers'
compensation plan provided that (A) the financial institution provides all required notices and
rights required by this ordinance to the plan sponsor, group or blanket insurance
policyholder, or group annuity contractholder and (B) the financial institution does not
disclose to any affiliate or any nonaffiliated third-party confidential consumer information
about the individual except as authorized in Section 5.140.050. A consumer does not include
an individual who obtains products or services for business, commercial, or agricultural
purposes.
(g) "Control" means the direct or indirect possession of the power to direct or cause the direction
of the management and policies of another entity. Control includes any of the following: (1)
ownership or power to vote 25 percent or more of the outstanding shares of any class of
voting security of a company, acting through one or more persons, (2) power in any manner
over the election of a majority of the directors, or of individuals exercising similar functions,
or (3) the power to exercise a directing influence over the management of policies of a
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2}}2lagenda20020806l20020... 0913012002
20020806_o_8 Page3 of7
company.
(h) "Necessary to effect, administer, or enforce" means the following:
(1) The disclosure is required, or is a usual, appropriate, or acceptable method to carry out
the transaction or the product or service business of which the transaction is apart, and
record or service or maintain the consumer's account in the ordinary course of
providing the financial service or financial product, or to administer or service benefits
or claims relating to the transaction or the product or service business of which it is a
part, and includes the following:
(A) Providing the consumer or the consumer's agent or broker with a confirmation,
statement, or other record of the transaction, or information on the status or
value of the financial service or financial product.
(B) The accrual or recognition of incentives or bonuses associated with the
transaction that are provided by the financial institution or another party
involved in providing the financial service or product.
(2) The disclosure is required or is a lawful method to enforce the rights of the financial
institution or of other persons engaged in carrying out the financial transaction or
providing the product or service.
(3) The disclosure is required, or is a usual, appropriate, or acceptable method for
insurance underwriting at the consumer's request, for reinsurance purposes, or for any
of the following purposes as they relate to a consumer's insurance:
(A) Account administration.
(B) Reporting, investigating, or preventing fraud or material misrepresentation.
(C) Processing premium payments.
(D) Processing insurance claims.
(E) Administering insurance benefits, including utilization review activities.
(F) Forinternalresearchpurposes.
(G) As otherwise required or specifically permitted by federal or state 1aw.
(4) The disclosure is required, or is a usual, appropriate or acceptable method, in
connection with the following:
(A) The authorization, settlement, billing processing, clearing, transferring,
reconciling, or collection of amounts charged, debited, or otherwise paid using
debit, credit or other payment card, check or account number, or by other
payment means.
(B) The transfer of receivables, accounts, or interest therein.
(C) The audit of debit, credit, or other payment information.
(i) "Financial product or service" means any product or service that a financial holding company
could offer by engaging in any activity that is financial in nature or incidental to financial
activity under subsection (k) of Section 1843 of Title 12 of the United States Code (the
United States Bank Holding Company Act of 1956). Financial service includes a financial
institution's evaluation or brokerage of information that the financial institution collects in
connection with a request or an application from a consumer for financial product or service.
0) "Clearly and conspicuously" means displayed in a manner that is readily noticeable, readable,
and understandable to consumers. Factors to be considered in determining whether a notice
or disclosure is clear and conspicuous include prominence, proximity, absence of distracting
elements, and clarity and understanding of the text disclosure.
(k) "Widely dishibuted media" means publicly available information from a telephone book, a
television or radio progmm, a newspaper or a Web site that is available to the general public
on an unrestricted basis.
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dirlBOSAgendas/agendas2}}2lagenda20020806l20020... 0913012002
20020806 o 8 Page 4 of 7
5.140.030 Non-DisclosureofConfidentialConsumerlnformation
(a) A financial institution shall not disclose to, or share a consumer's confidential consumer
information with, any nonaffiliated third party or affiliate unless the financial institution has
provided written notice to the consumer to whom the confidential consumer information
relates and unless the financial institution has obtained a consent acknowledgement signed by
the consumer that authorizes the financial institution to disclose or share the confidential
consumer information. A financial institution shall not deny a consumer a financial product
or a financial service because the consumer has not provided the signed consent
acknowledgment required by this section to authorize the financial institution to disclose or
share his or her confidential consumer information with any nonaffiliated third-party or
affiliate.
(b) Nothing in this ordinance shall prohibit a financial institution from marketing its own
products and services or the products and services of others to the financial institution's own
customers, provided no confidential consumer information is disclosed except as permitted
by Section 5.140.050.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, an entity that receives confidential consumer
information from a financial institution under this ordinance shall not disclose this
information to any other entity, unless the disclosure would be lawful if made directly to the
other entity by the financial institution.
5.140.040 Notice and Consent
(a) Nothing in this ordinance shall require a financial institution to provide a written notice to a
consumer pursuant to Section 5.140.030 if the financial institution does not disclose
confidential consumer information to any nonaffiliated third-party or to any affiliate, except
as provided in Section 5.140.050.
(b) A financial institution shall provide written notices and consent acknowledgements required
by this ordinance to consumers as separate written documents that are easily identifiable and
distinguishable from other documents that otherwise may be provided to a consumer. A
notice provided to a member of a household pursuant to Section 5.140.030 shall be
considered notice to all members of that household unless that household contains another
individual who also has a separate account with the financial institution.
(c) Written notices required by this ordinance shall include at least the following:
(1) The specific types of information that would be disclosed or shared,
(2) The general circumstances under which the information would be disclosed or shared,
(3) The specific types of persons or businesses that would receive the information, and
(4) The specific proposed types of uses for the information.
5.140.050 Exempt Disclosures
(a) Section 5.140.030 shall not apply to information that is not personally identifiable to a
particular person.
(b) Section 5.140.030 shall not prohibit the release of confidential consumer information under
the following circumstances :
(1) The confidential consumer information is necessary to effect, administer, or enforce a
transaction requested or authorized by the consumer, or in connection with servicing or
processing a financial product or service requested or authorized by the consumer, or
in connection with maintaining or servicing the consumer's account with the financial
institution, or with another entity as part of a private label credit card program or other
extension of credit on behalf of such entity, or in connection with a proposed or actual
securitization or secondary market sale, including sales of servicing-rights, related to a
transaction of the consumer.
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806l20020... 09130/2002
20020806 o 8 Page 5 of7
(2) The confidential consumer information is released with the signed consent
acknowledgment of or at the written direction of the consumer.
(3) The confidential consumer information is:
(A) Released to protect the confidentiality or security of the financial institution's
records pertaining to the consumer, the service or product, or the transaction
therein.
(B) Released to protect against or prevent actual or potential fraud, identity theft,
unauthorized transactions, claims or other liability.
(C) Released for required institutional risk control, or for resolving customer
disputes or inquiries.
(D) Released to persons holding a legal or beneficial interest relating to the
consumer.
(E) Released to persons acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity on behalf of
the consumer.
(4) The confidential consumer information is released to provide information to insurance
rate advisory organizations, guaranty funds or agencies, applicable rating agencies of
the financial institution, persons assessing the institution's compliance with industry
standards, and the institution's attomeys, accountants, and auditors.
(5) The confidential consumer information is released to the extent specifically required or
specifically permitted under other provisions of law and in accordance with the Right
to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. Sec. 3401 et seq.), to law enforcement
agencies, including a federal functional regulator, the Secretary of the Treasury with
respect to 12 U.S.C. Secs. 195l-1959, the Califomia Departrnent of Insurance, or the
Federal Trade Commission, and self-regulat ory or ganizations.
(6) The confidential consumer information is released (A) to a consumer reporting agency
in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.), or (B)
from a consumer report reported by a consumer reporting agency.
(7) The confidential consumer information is released in connection with a proposed or
actual sale, merger, transfer, or exchange of all or a portion of a business or operating
unit if the disclosure of confidential consumer information solely concerns consumers
of the business or unit.
(8) The confidential consumer information is released to comply with federal, state, or
local laws, rules, and other applicable legal requirements; to comply with a properly
authorized civil, criminal, or regulatory investigation or subpoena or surrmons by
federal, state, or local authorities; or to respond to judicial process or government
regulatory authorities having jurisdiction over the financial institution for examination,
compliance, or other purposes as authorized by law.
(9) When a financial institution is reporting a known or suspected instance of elder or
dependent adult financial abuse or is cooperating with a local adult protecting services
agency investigation of known or suspected elder or dependent adult financial abuse
pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 15630) of Chapter 11 of Part 3 of
Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(10) The confidential consumer information is released to a nonaffiliated third party in
order for the nonaffiliated third party to perform services for or functions on behalf of
the financial institution in connection with the financial institution's products and
services, such as mailing services, data processing or analysis, or customer surveys,
provided that all of the following requirements are met:
(A) The services to be performed by the nonaffiliated third party would be lawful if
performed by the financial institution.
(B) There is a written contract between the nonaffiliated third party and the financial
institution that prohibits the nonaffiliated third party from disclosing or using
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806/20020.-. 0913012002
20020806_o_8 Page 6 of7
the confidential consumer information other than to carry out the purpose for
which the financial institution disclosed the information, as set forth in the
written contract.
(c) The confidential consumer information provided to the nonaffiliated third party
is limited to that which is reasonably necessary for the nonaffiliated third party
to perform the services contracted for on behalf of the financial institution.
(11) The confidential consumer information is released to identiff or locate missing and
abducted children, witnesses, criminals and fugitives, parties to lawsuits, parents
delinquent in child support payments, organ and bone marow donors, pension funds
beneficiaries, and missing heirs.
(c) Nothing in this ordinance is intended to change existing law relating to access by law
enforcement agencies to information held by financial institutions.
5.140.060 InsuranceandSecuritiesDisclosures
(a) The restrictions on disclosure and use of confidential consumer information, and the
requirement for notification, disclosure, and opportunity for the consumer to either direct that
the confidential consumer information not be disclosed or provided prior written consent, as
provided in this ordinance, do not apply to any person or entity that meets the requirements
of Section 5.140.060 (a) (1) or (2) except when confidential consumer information is or will
be shared with an affiliate or nonaffiliated third party.
(1) The person or entity is licensed in one or both of the following categories and is acting
within the scope of the respective license:
(A) As an insurance producer, licensed pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with
Section 162l), Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760), or Chapter 8
(commencing with Section l83l) of Division 1 of the Insurance Code.
(B) Is duly licensed to sell securities.
(2) The person or entity meets the requirements of Section 5.140.060 (a) (1) and has a
written contractual agreement with another person or entity described in subsection (a)
(1) and the contract clearly and explicitly includes the following:
(A) The rights and obligations between the licensees arising out of the business
relationship relating to insurance or securities transactions.
(B) An explicit limitation on the use of confidential consumer information about a
;f,:r;#r"j"f"5.*sactions
authorized by the contract and permitted pursuant to
(C) A requirement that transactions specified in the contract fall within the scope of
activities permitted by the licenses of the parties.
(b) The restrictions on disclosure and use of confidential consumer information, and the
requirement for notification and disclosure provided in this ordinance, shall not limit the
ability of insurance producers and brokers to respond to written or electronic, including
telephone, requests from consumers seeking price quotes on insurance products and services.
5.140.070 Administrative Fines
(a) In addition to any other remedies and penalties provided by law, any financial institution that
negligently discloses or shares confidential consumer information in violation of this
ordinance shall be liable, irrespective of the amount of damages suffered by the consumer as
a result of that violation, for an administrative fine not to exceed one thousand five hundred
dollars ($1,500) per violation.
(b) Any financial institution that knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses confidential
consumer information in violation of this ordinance shall be liable upon a first violation, for
an administrative fine not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation,
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806/20020... 0913012002
20020806 o 8 Page 7 of 7
or upon a second violation for an administrative fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars
($10,000) per violation, or upon a third or subsequent violation for an administrative fine not
to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation.
(c) Any financial institution that knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses confidential
consumer information in violations of this ordinance for financial gain shall be liable upon a
first violation of this ordinance for an administrative fine not to exceed five thousand dollars
($5,000) per violation, or upon a second violation for an administrative fine not to exceed
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation, or upon a third or subsequent violation
for an administrative penalty not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) per
violation and shall be subject to disgorgement or any proceeds or other consideration
obtained as a result of the violation.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing an administrative fine or civil
penalty under both 5.140.070 (b) and (c) for the same violation.
5.140.080 Fair Credit Reporting Act or Federal Conflict
This ordinance shall not be construed in a manner that is inconsistent with the federal Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.).
5.140.090 Severability
(a) If any provision of this ordinance is held by any court or by any Federal or State agency of
competent jurisdiction, to be invalid as conflicting with any Federal or State law, rule or
regulation now or hereafter in effect, or is held by such court or agency to be modified in any
way in order to conform to the requirements of any such law, rule or regulation, such
provision shall be considered a separate, distinct, and independent part of this ordinance, and
such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of all other provisions hereof. In
the event that such law, rule or regulation is subsequently repealed, rescinded, amended or
otherwise changed, so that the provision thereof which had previously been held invalid or
modified is no longer in conflict with such law, rule or regulation, said provision shall
thereupon return to full force and effect and shall thereafter be binding.
(b) If any section, subsection, phrase, clause, sentence, or word in this ordinance shall for any
reason be held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not
nulliff the remainder of this ordinance but shall be confined to the article, section,
subsection, subdivision, clause, sentence or word so held invalid or unconstitutional."
SECTION 2 This ordinance shall be effective January 1,2003.
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806l20020... 0913012002
20020806 m 8
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Page I of3
COTI\TY OF SAN MATEO
Inter-Departmental Correspondence
Board of Supervisors
DATE: JuJy 16,2002
BOARD MEETING DATE: July 23,2002
Honorable Board of Supervisors
Supervisor Mike Nevin
Proposed County Ordinance regarding Consumer Financial lnformation Privacy
Recommendation
Approve introduction of a County ordinance regarding consumer financial information privacy
with a second reading and adoption no sooner than August 6,2002.
Background
In1999, Congress enacted the Financial Services Modernization Act (also known as the Gramm-
Leach-Bliley, or "GLB"Act). GLB is intended generally to prevent various financial institutions
from conducting the business of other financial institutions. As part of the act, GLB allows
businesses to share and sell customer information. The act requires financial institutions to inform
consumers of their right to "opt out" (to notify affirmatively the financial institution that the
consumer does not want his or her information shared). However, the "opt out" provision applies
only to disclosures to non-affiliated third parties, such as telemarketers. Under GLB, customers
have no right to opt out of the sharing of their nonpublic information between affiliates. GLB
permits states to provide increased protections.
SB 773 (Speier) and AB 1775 (Nation) have been two more prominent attempts to pass state
legislation on the issue of financial information privacy. AB 1775 has effectively died in the
Assembly Judiciary Committee. SB 773 remains on the Assembly floor having passed through
the Senate and the required Assembly policy committees. The bill failed to gain the required 41
votes to pass the Assembly floor (32 ayes,26 noes; September 2001).
SB 773 has been consistently granted reconsideration on the floor since the September 2001 vote.
Senator Speier hopes to find the votes needed for passage before the end of the session in
November.
Daly City has introduced an ordinance similar to SB 773. The ordinance's second reading has
been scheduled for August 12,2002.
The County's proposed ordinance would, with exceptions, prohibit "financial institutions" from
disclosing "confidential information" to third parties unless the financial institution has given
written notice to the consumer and has received signed consent acknowledgement from the
customer authorizing the disclosure. This ordinance would allow for administrative fines to be
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806l20020... 09l3Ol2OO2
20020806_m_8
levied against those financial institutions that negligently or intentionally disclose such
information.
Page2 of3
Discussion
Consumers are increasingly concemed about the privacy of their personal financial information.
According to a Harris poll released in February 2002,75o/o of those polled expressed concem
about companies they patronized providing their information to other companies without their
permission.
Advances in technology and the proliferation and manageability of consumer information
databases have enabled financial institutions significant ability to sell and utilize information of
all kinds including nonpublic personal information about consumers. Over 5 years ago Christine
Varney, Former Federal Trade Commissioner (1994-1997), stated, "[P]ersonal information about
an individual is being collected at arate and to a degree unthinkable even five years ago."
Subsequent developments in technology and compatibility to technology only reinforce
Commissioner Varney's comments in 1 996. In support of SB 773, State Senator Jackie Speier
stated protection of confidential consumer information is, "critical, since, with increasingly
sophisticated innovations in technology, banks can manipulate the information to enable them to
profile customers by, for example, wealth, personal habits, and life events such as inheritances,
higher salary, and pregnancy."
The sharing of confidential consumer information can impact consumers in ways they consider
negative. Beth Givens, Executive Director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, in testimony
before the State Assembly Banking and Finance Committee regarding a similar privacy bill, gave
several examples of how the sharing, selling and basic mishandling of confidential consumer
information can have results not desired by consumers. Examples included a financial institution's
sale of confidential consumer information "to a felon who then made hundreds of thousands of
fraudulent entries on their credit cards to the tune of several million dollars in fraud."
Existing law, as reflected in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, does not provide a variety of
protections proposed in the ordinance. GLB allows financial institutions to share confidential
consumer information unless the consumer "opts out" of such disclosures. "Opt out" provisions
require the consumer to take affirmative action to prevent the financial institution from sharing
the consumer's confidential consumer information. The failure of the consumer to take that
affirmative action implicitly permits the financial institution to share the information with
nonaffiliated third parties. The opt-out provision of GLB does not adequately gauge a consumer's
opinion about how the consumer's information is to be used. Failure to opt out can result from a
number of factors including the consumer's inability to understand the opt-out notice or their
simple failure to identify the opt out notice from other notices and advertisements included in the
financial institutions communications. The consumer's conscious and active decision to take no
action is only one of many reasons for a consumer to not opt-out. In addition, GLB does not
permit consumers to opt out of information sharing between affiliates.
The proposed ordinance would provide greater protection to consumers. Similar to the May 30th
amended version of SB 773,the proposed ordinance would, with exceptions, require financial
institutions to provide consumers with written notice and to receive signed consent
acknowledgment before they share the consumer's confidential information with third parties. By
requiring consumers to "opt in" financial institutions would be able to better determine the wishes
of consumers regarding the sharing of their confidential information. The ordinance would require
the written notice to describe the information to be shared, to what entities and for what purposes
the information will be shared.
The proposed ordinance would provide greater protections than that found in Daly City's financial
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2}l2lagenda20020806l20020... 0913012002
20020806_m_8 Page 3 of3
information privacy ordinance. Daly City's ordinance addresses negligent disclosures, but does
not address willful or intentional disclosures.
However, this ordinance would not prohibit financial institutions from conducting everyday
business such as using a separate company for mailing services for monthly bills and statements.
This ordinance would also not prohibit financial institutions from marketing to their own
customers. This ordinance would only apply to financial institutions located within
unincorporated San Mateo County and for customers using those financial institutions.
This Board supports SB 773 (Speier) and has reaffirmed its support for the bill with a letter signed
by all Board members urging the Assembly leadership to pass the bill and send it to Governor
Davis.
With the inadequate protections of federal law and the inability of the State Legislature to pass
greater protections, this ordinance provides an alternative method by which consumers can be
protected. This ordinance would serve as a model ordinance for cities within San Mateo County
as well as a model ordinance for other California counties.
Vision Alignment
Adoption of this ordinance ensures basic health and safety for all and supports Goal #7 to
maintain and enhance the public safety of all residents and visitors.
Fiscal Impact
Adoption of the ordinance would have no fiscal impact to the County. However, potential
litigation surrounding the ordinance and enforcement activities would have unknown costs. The
approved administrative fines would offset some of the costs for enforcement.
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/bos.dir/BOSAgendas/agendas2002lagenda20020806l20020... 09130/2002
vd/42/2val 14rJ4 Ll rY LLtt(KS Ul-FlLt ) 9542BJHb N0.152 0AA2
l,v
ctrl b)l
TN ORDINA}ICE OE TIE CITI COI'NCIL OF TIIE CITY OF DAI,Y CTrY
RBQITIRTNC NOTICE AND CONSs{'t PRIOR TO DISCIOSITRE OF
CINFIDETEIAL CONgI'}TBR INFON,UATION BY FINANCIA:L TNSTITTITIONII
ehrptar 5.92 of t!€ DaIy Cit)r l'fiElc{pr1 eoda
Tbe ciry council, of rhe ciEy of Daly ciDy DoEs oRDAIN a5 fol.lows:
aBqrroN 1. fbe cj.Ey of Daly Ciry atoes heleby ad.opE rhis oratinanceprohibiti[g, wiEh exceptioDs, the disclosure of confidential corf,sumer
information, as defined beLow. by financial inst.ilut,ion6 locaEed wichln rheCity of Daly Ciry.
sEcEIoN 2. The purpose of this Ordinatrce io uo require Iocal fina]lcialiDstitutiors to provj.de tbeir customers Doclce ald meaningful choice a-bout
how consumerE, personal iDfolllaEion is sbared or sold by their financialilstituEions,
DtgCLOgrrRE Op OOMIDtlrTrlr ctxsr !R lrnonrrATroN
BY TOCIE PIIIAIICIAT IIIIITI TT'TI OXS
Sectiona,
5.92.010
5.92 -020
5.92.030
5.92.0tO
5.92 . 050
5 -92 -060
5.92.070
5,92.010 Dlfr.alCr.on,
D€flaiEi.ons.
Ivo!-Dl6clodure o! Cotfiiletbial Conguoer Irfornation.
Notice and Coa8cat.
8:tlq)t Di6cloaure3.
InsuraDcG rtrd SGcurLelor DLgcloaurEg,
.ldDltrl,€traELve PeDa].ties ald Civil IcDedi.s-
lair Crcttll RGportlaE .ltcr or ,ederal coaflict.
Por tbe purpos€s of rbis chapter, the follolding defiuitions apply:
(a) { Conf ialent.!.al conaumer informatiotl" ueans persqDafly idenElftablefinancial inf,orrarion (1) 'that a coDsu,mer provtdes tso a fiDancial inst,itutionEo obrain a product or service frorn t!.e fina.ncial i[stlEucion, (2] a-bout acoEsuEer resultiDg trom any trangaction iavolviug a product or servicebetueeD the financial lnslltutioD and a consumer, "i (f) th&b Ehc flnarciatiDstitution Otherviae obtains a50ut a coBEumer in coanecclon with providing aproducc or service to thaE coDsumer. A-Ey p.reonarr.y idenrifiable informationiE liaanclar if 1! was obEained by a fiaanciat inetituclon la coDnection withproviding a financial product orlservice to a consuner, lncludlng th€ factEbat a coDauner is a customer of a flnaDclar instlcution rocated within theCiEy of DaIy City. Confldentsial colcruner infornation does aot inctu&pubLlcly available itrformation rhat 16 rar{fur}y made awailable to the generar
I
ORDINA}ICE NO. 1295
IIECTION 3. Chaprer 5.92 of the Daly City Municipal code is hereafter
added to tbe Daly City Municipal Code to read as folLows:
cElPTlL 5.92
oa/42/24e2 14t34 CITY CLERKS oFFICE ) 93428386 N0.152 0AA3
pubLic from (1) fetleral. ataCe, or 1ocal goverameD.E records, (2) uiately
di6tribueeal Redia, or(3) disclosures to tbe geD,eraL public thats are
requj.red to be made of fealeral, state, or local la!,r, excep! thaE confidenEial
consumer inforo.aciou sha1l include aDy 1ist, descript.ion, or otber groupiDg
of consumera, and pu.b1icly available information Bertaining Bo chemthat is derLved using aay nonpublic personal. informat.ion other Eba!publicly available intormation, but shalL not incl.ude aay 1ists,
de6cripcion, or ocber grouping of conEumers, aad pu.bl,icly available
informatioa pertaiulng to tbem tbaE is derived wiEhout usi[g aDy
conf ideatial consumer inforrnatioD.
(b) "PersoBally identifiable financial iofornation" io,cludes allof the follorring:(1) hformatsion a conaumer provides Eo a financial institution
IocaEed witbiE the CiEy of Daly city oa au applicatiorl Eo obEain a loan,credit card, or other finaacial producE or service.
(2) Account balance iaformaElon, payment bistory, overilraft
biacory artd credlt or debiE card purchaoe iD'forlIatsion.
(3) Tbe facE Eb,aE an ildivialual i6 or has been a customer of aflnancial insticution localed erithirl tbe City of DaIy Cify or has obtained aflnarecial product or servioe from a financial instituBion located witsblD tsheCity of DaIy city.
(a) Any informatlon about a financial insEitutioE's consuner if icle diacloseil iD a marlller tbae indicaEes Ehac Ebe indivldual ia or
has beea the fi ancial i!.stiEutioD'B coDBumer.(5) Ary iufonDation Ehag a consumer proeide6 to a fiaancialiaEcicurion or rhat a fiaaacial iBstitutioa located rrithiD Ehe ciry of DalyCity or iCE agenE, otherwise obtaiBs in coir!.ecEioD with collect'ing on a IoaBor servicing a loa!,.
(5) Any lnformatioD, collectcd through an InEernet cookie or anintormation collectiDg device from a web Berver.(7) Information from a consumer report.
(c) "fiD.ancial in€Citution. generally meaa6 iury inBtsiEutl.oD locatediE the City of DaIy Cl,r.y that ia engaging iu fiaa:rcia1 activitieE q6
described ln secEio!. 1843 (k) of TiEle 12 of the uDited stateE coale and doiEgbusincsa ln tbe Clty of Daly City. Ibe term "finaEclal ln6t.ltutlo!.. doeshclude a cormercial ba't., ErusE oorpauly, savlage aooociatioD, iDduslrialIoan conpaay, credit union, Lnsurance compauy, aecuritLea bioierage or peraonengaged iE the..busi-ueao of lendiag money and doing busiuess in Ul Ctty- otDaly Ctty.
(d) oAffiliate' neara any person or eDtity Ehat, atirecEly or iDdirectly,coatro.Ls, ls oontrolled by, or iE under comnon contror rrith aDother perso; orentity.
(c) "conaumern means a[ iDdj.vidual r,rho obtains or has obtailed afiua',cial producc or serrice from a fiuaacial instltution located. withiD. theClty of Daly city that is to be used primarlly for personal, family, orbousehold purposes, or that lndlvidual,6 legal reprisentalive -
(f) nNecessary Eo effcct, ad{riBiEter, or eDforqe, meaas the follolrilg r
(1) The d.isclo6ule iB required, or is a usual, appropriaEe, orcustoEary meEhod to carry ouE the traDsacttotr or the product orservlce busineeE of shicb the lranBacEioD ia a part, and record orservicc or nalatain tbe coDaunEr t a accou[t iB Eb.e ord,itrary courga ofproviding the iinancial servicc or fin8acial pfoduct, or to
2
t
AA/42/2442 !4t34 CITY CLERKS oFFICE + 93428386
admilister or service benefifE or claillG lelaEing to Ehe transactlon
or chc producc or aervice business of wbich it is a part, aDd
includes the followiag:
(A) Providing cIe consumer or tbe corEuner'a ageDt or broker witb.
a coDfirEatioB, sEatemeDE, or oEher record of the ErangacEion, or
iDtormation on tbe status o! value of the fi[aD.cial service or
fiuancial product.
(E) The accmal or recogai.lion of iaceatiwes or bouuaeB aa6ociated
r.rith the transacEion Ehat are provided bry Ehe finaacial instiEutio! located
rriEbin Ebe City of Daly City or anotber party iDvoLved in prov!.ding the
financlal, service or product.
(2) The discloaure le required or 1s a larrful method to enforce
tbe rigb.ts of the financial instiEution or of other persons engaged
in.carrying ouE lhe fiDancial lraD.saclioD or providing the product or
6ervice.
(3) The discloEure iE required, or ia a usual, appropriaEe, or
custooary melhod for insurance underwriEing at the coD,sumer,s reque6t. for
reitrsurance purposeB, or for any of the following purposes as Ehey relate Eo
a consumer' s insuratce:
(A) Accourt admiDistratj.oD.
(B) Reporting, inveetigauing, or preveating fraud or material
misrepreeentacion.
(C) Processing premiurn paymeEEs .
(D) Processing insurance claims.
(E) Adminigtering insurance beDef ibs, iDcluaiing utilization rewiewacti.viEies.
(F) For iDternal research purposea.
(G) As otsherwise required by federal or state lar.r.
(,1) The diBclosure is reguired. or i6 a ueual, appropriate, or
customary meihod, in co::aecEion vlth tsbe foJ.lowiag:(A) Tbe autshorizatioE, setElemenE, bi]ling, proceBsLng, clearing,tra-EBferriD.g, recoaciling, or collecEion of a&ountE cb.arged, debited,or oEherlrise paid using a debit, cred,it or other payllent card, check, or
account number, or by other pa)rmeDt meaEs.
(E) The transfer of receivableE, accounts, or i!tserests therein.(C) The audiE of debits, credlt, or other pa)ment iqtormation.
5.92.020 Iton-Dlscloauro of Coaf idestlrl ColluDcr IaforEacion
N0.152 DAO4
(g) "Clcarly and conspicuoltsly' meaaB dieplayed iD. a ma-Drer thatie readily noticeable, reada5le, arld urdersEaldable to consumerB.
FacEors to be considered in determlning wheEher a Eotice or disclosure igclear aad co[apicuous incrude proninence, proximity, aboence of dlatracuiage1erteDts, aDA clariEy aad under6lalding of the text disclosure.
(b) nwidely diEtributed med-ia, rtrean6 publlcly avaiLable i'formetiou from alalephotre book, a Eelewisioa or radio program, a lewspaper or a l{eb site tshatis available to the geaeral public on an u.nreaErlcEed basis.
(a) A fiDanclal i!.dtitsutioa localed with the city of Daly city 6ha1lnot dl.EcloBe to, or share a conftdenEial coDsumer inrornraciou reltl, any thirclparty, including an affiliate or ageaE of that flna'.cial tnsClUuClon, ir aBubsldlary, .nress the financial, iastitution has provialed wrLEten notLce totbe consumer to $rhoN! the confldentlar conoumer informatioE relateg alad urLessEbe flaaDclar ln6tltutsion hao obtained a writte' or electroDic co[Eencacluor.rledgrnent fron the conBumer tha! authgrizes the fi[ancial LnsEl,tqlio't Eodisclose or share the coBfident.ial conBumer iDformatioo.
3
ae/42/2442 74t34 CITY CLERKS oFFICE ) 93428386
(b) A financial instltution locaEed within the City of Daly City shall
aoc deuy a corlsumer a finaucial produc! or a financial service because the
consumer bas not provided. the conaenE requlled by cbi6 subdivision to
autharize the fiaancial iusEitulior to discloee or ahare hl.s or herconfidential conBumer informatioD witb aBy third-party or affiliate"
(c) If the consumer declinea to afflnraEively coaoent that confideD.tial
consutner informalioD may be disclosed, EheD a finaucial iD.oticuEion looaEediu tbe City of DaIy City ahaU lot be allowed to earkeE its owr productss or
Eervices to lbat coDsumer, or to provide tbat coDsumer's confidenEialinfonriation to with any rhlrd parEy, buoiness, agenE or enEity, except as
provided in tbe Exenps Djsclosures of SubgectioD 5.92.040, below.
5.92.030 Notice aDd Conient
(a) A tinancial institution ]ocated iD Ehe city of DaIy City thatproposes to disclose or share a corlsumer i s confideD.tiar consumer informacioDshall provide a Drriccen notice Co the consumer tbat ale€cribes (1) thespecific Eypes of information thaE would be disclosed or shared, (2) Ehegeueral circumstanceg under whlch the informatio! woulal be disclosed orshared, (3) the specific types of persoDs or businesses that. wouldreceive the informat.lon, and ({) Ehe specific propoged Eypee of usesfor the information.
N0.152 0a@5
(b) A finaacial insEitution Located in Ehe City of DaIy city shal.lprovide roEices and consent acxnolrledgmencs to con6umer6 a6 separate
docunenlE that are easily identifiabte anil disEiBguisbable from other
documenEs Eb,ac ocherwiBe may be provlded, Eo a conlumer.
5.92. 0a0 &e[tpt, DiscloBuaeB
(1) The confidertial consumer ilforaalioa is necessary to effecl,a&liDi8ber, or enforce a trangactsior requeBted or authorized. by thecoDBumer, or in coru.ectiou wlth serviciag or proceasing a financialproduct or service requested or authorized by the oonsuncr, or inco'Dection yith mainEainiDg or sereicing tl:e consumer's accou't rrltbthe fina{cial inatitution locared ui EhiD. Ehe cihy of Daly City, or withanother entity aE part of a privaEe label creali! card program- or otherexte[sioD of crediE on behalf of such eD.tj.ty, or in conneition wit] apropoBed or actual 6ecuritizaiion or secondary markeE 6a1e. including aaleaof gervicing rigbt6, relaEed to a transacEion ot the consurner.(2) The coDfideD.t.ial coDsumer iDfornEtion is released with theconsen! of or at the direcEion of lhe conaumer.(3) llre oobfldenuial consu$e! lnformacion lEr(A) Relea6ed Co prolect Ebe corlfidentlauty or sacurlty ot tbefi'a'ciat inaEitutsior,s records pertalniDg to tbe consumer, tshe service orproduct, or Ehe transaction chereiD.(B) Releaaed to protect agaiDst or preveDt acEual or poteEtialfraud, idenEity bhcft, u'autborized trartsactioas, claims, or ot-her ltability.(c) ReleaBeA for required instiEutioBal risk conErol, or forreaolving cualomer dieputea or inguiries.(D) ReleaEetl to persono bolding a lagaL or benefici.al iD.lereBE
(a) Thls Chapter Bhalt nots appl.y to iaformatioa lhats iE D'oE personallyidentsifiable to a particular perBoD,.
(b) fbis cltapter shall noc prohibir Ehe release of cotfialelEialconguner lnformatloa utder the folLowing circumgtaDces;
4
.@8/42/24@2 14134 CITY CLERKS OFFICE ) 93424346
relaEiEg tso Ehe conEumer.
(E) Released to persoas acting in a fiduciary or represeaEative
caPacitY on behalf of Ehe consumer,
(F) Released to a courE of compeDent jurisdictsion.
(s) Released to a state or I'ocal agency for the purpose8 of child
supporc enforcemeDt.
(4) The confidsrtial coDoumer informatio[ is released Eo provide
information bo irsurance rate advisory organizatiooe, guaranby fundE
or agencies, applicable rating ageucies of cbe finarlcial institution,
persons asEessing the insEitution's compliaDce with industry scanalardE,
and the iEEEilulion'B attorfleys. accountanEg, atld auditors, provided
rhat rhe informaEion oblained is Dot useA for ary other purpooe.
(5) The confident.ial couEumer ilformation io releaged tso the
excenE specitically required under other provisions of law and in
accordance with the Right to Fiaancial Privacy AcE of 1.978 (12 U.S.C.
Sec. 3401 e! seq.), to 1au enforceEeD.l ageuoies, includiag a federal
funcEioDal reg'ulator, the secretary of the Treasur). with regpect to
subchapter Ir of Chapter 53 of Title 31, and Clapter 2 of Ticle I of
Public Law 91-508 (12 U-S.C. Seca. 1951-1959), the california DepartsnenE of
InsuraDce, or the Federal Trade Comnisaion, and self-requlatory
organizatione -(6) Ahe confidential consumer informatiou is released (A) to a
consuner reportiDg agenry in aocordaroe with the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec, 1681 ec oeq.), or (B) from a consumer
reporE reportcd, by a coneumer reporting agency, provlded that the
iaformation obtained ie noE ueed for any other purpoee,(7) The confidertial coDsumer informatioD. is released incorlection reith a proposed or actual saLe, merger, transfer. or
exchatrge of alL or a portion o! a bu6ine6s or operati!.g unit if lhediaclogure of conflaiencial, consumer informalion concernB EoleLy
consumers of sucb business or unit.(8) The confidentl.al consuner iaforuration is released to comPlylrith federal. stare, or 1ocaI 1awa. rules, aDd ocher applicable legal
requiremenls, Co coq)Iy l,.lith a properLy auEhorized civi1, criminal,or regulatory investigation or subpoena or sumrnons by federal, state,or losal authoriliea; or to respbnd to juclicial. procees or government
regiulatory authoritieg having JurlBdictlon ower Ehe finaEcial insc.icution forexaniDation, compliance, or other purposes as authorized by Iaw.(9) rher a flnancial insritutsioE in rhe City of Daly City iBreportiag a }coown or suspected in6Eanoe ot elder or depend,eat adurE finarclar
abuse or is cooperaclng vrlcb a local adults protectsiwe eervicea ageucyinveGtigatio! of kaosn or suEpeoted e1d.er or depenaleqt adult tinanctil abuBe
purBuar.t, to Article 3 (commenciag rith SecEi@ 15630) of ChapEer 11 of palt 3of Di-viEion 9 of the relfare and hstlEuti.ons Code.
5.92.050 IDsuralco aDA EecuritLGc D:IacI oatiraa
N0.152 0AA6
(a) The restrictioBs on d,isclosure aD.d uEe of contideDtiaL coBsu&erLnfornratlon, ard Ehe requlreneBt. for Eotification, disclosure, aodotrDortuDity for the coEaumer to direct that tshe coafideatiaL cqDsumerj.nf,ormation be d:lacloEed throuqb prl.or yrittseD coEsen!, as provided in tbisChapter, do not apBl,y to aa), peraon or eD,tity thats ureete paragraph (L) or(2). belowr
(1) Tbe peraoD or eDtj.ty is liccrreed iD one or borh of tha follotrlngcategories- ald is acting tdithin tbe Ecop€ of the rcspectl,vc licenge:(A) Aa an ineuranie ageot, Iicenaed purauaat to Cbapt6r s(conrnenclng rith SecElon 1621), Cbapccr 6 (cornrnenc!.ng witb SectioD.
5
L760), or ctapter I (cofi0nencing wiEh Section 1831) of Division L of
Ehe In6ur lce code .
(B) Is licensed to sell 6ecurities by Ehe uniEed st,aEes securities
and Exchange CommiosioD.
(2) The person or entity meeE.6 Ehe requirements iu paragraph (1)
aDd bas a Hritten contractual agreemert wiEh aDother person or entity
described in laragraph (1) aud the sontract clearly and explicilly
includes, but is not limiEed to, the following:
(A) The rights and obligations of tsbe parties in the insurance or
secrrrities transacEion-
(B) An e)cplicit Linitation otr Ehe use of confidential. consumer
information about a consumer to cransactions autborized by the
contract and tbe requiremenEs contaiaed in tshie Chapter.
(C) The EransacE.ionr gpecified iu subparagraPh (B) fa]l withiE tbe
6cope of acEivities permitted by Ehe licen€es of tbe perEies.
(b) Tbe restricEions on disclosure aad use of confidential
conalurer information, and tbe requiremeat for notificatioD, aEd
di6cl.o6ure provlded in thls chapcer, 6ba11 noE Linir the abiliEy of
ingurance agerto and brokera to reEpond !o w'rittcn or elecEronic,
iucludiag lelephone, requeBto from conEumers oeeking price quotes oE
insurance products and serviceg.
5.92.060 ldDitriatraEivc PaDaltios and Civil Reaed.iea
5.92 . 070 Iair Crcdit I,eportinq lct oE lid8Erl conflLct
slcrloN { -SewarabLlLty.
N0.152 0AA?
(a) In additiou to any other remcdies available at Iaw, any
conBumer may briag aD action agaiust a!.y financial iD3titution locatedin the ciE], of DaIy city thaE negligently discloses o! sbares confideutial
coEsumer iDformation concerning bim or her ill violation of chis chapEer,for eicher or boEh of tshe fo1lorriD.g:(1) Nominal damages of one hund.red do11ar6 (g1oo). In order torecover under thiB paragraph, it sball not be necessary tbat tshe pleiutiffsuffered or waE lhreaEened l,ith acEual damageo.(2) The amount of actual daBages, if ary, sustained by tbe consumer.
{b) In addition, any fina-nciaL irsEitution located iu the City of Da}yciEy Ebat negligentty discloses or shares confidential co'sumer intormationin violatio' ot Ehis Chapter shall be liable, lrrespecclve of the anount ofdanages suffered by Ebe coDsumer aE a resul,t of that violabio!, for aD.administratlve fj.ne or ciwil penalty aot to exceed five hundred. dolLarg($500) per violatioa.
ThiE cbapter aharl aots be coastrued: in a mauuer that is inconsisrent $lEhtbe federal pair Credit ReporriDg.Lct (15 U,S,c. Sec- 1681 eE seq.) i or to beiE coDflicE r/itsh a,"y f,ederal seaEutc or regurarion thae pre-empcJ Ei.is areaof reguletl,oD to tb,e exclusion of local conErol.
If any provision of bhis. Chapter is hetd by a_D.y courc or by any pederal orsrate agency of co'rpeteDt Jurisdictlon, co be luvalld ae conflicting witb atryPederaL or EEaEe r.ar.r, rurc or reguration nov or hereafter in effecll or iahgfd by such cour! or agency to be nodifiedt iE any rray in order to co!.form tothe requirementa of aDy auch lar, rure or reguraEl.on, such provision 6har1 beeonsialered a Eeparate, distinct, and independeuE parE of tbie Chaptcr, aad
6
-A8/A2/2442 L4134 CITY CLERKS oFFICE ) 9342A3A5
"A8/A2/2O92 14t34 CITY CLERKS BFFICE ) 93428386 N0.152 D8A8
such bolding ehall noE affect the validity and enforceabiliEy of a1l other
provisioos hereof. In the events Ehat such law, rule or regul.atiou is
subsequentl.y repealed, rescinded, amended or othemise changed, so that tshe
provision thereof which had previously been held invalid or modlfied is no
longer in conflicb with such laur, nrle or regulation, said. provision shall
thereupon return to fuII force and ef,fect and sbal} thereafter be binding.
If any article, eection, gubseccion, phrase, clause, sentence, or word inthis Ctrapter shal.l for any reaE,or be held invalid or unconstitutional by a
court of compeUenc Jurisdiotion, its sbalI not nuLlify che remainder of tbis
Chapter but ghalI be confined to Ehe articJ.e, section, eubgection,
subdivision, clause, sentence or yrord so held invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. Bnv:Lronaantal Determination.
Ihe clty council of che City of Daly City finde a.ad determinee that the
implemeutation of measuree deacrtbed ln this Chapter is in furtherance police
powers of rhe City of DaIy City, and. that theee purposes are exempE from the
prowisions of tshe California Environmental Orality Act (CEQA),- Ctapter 3
(commencing wiEh Section 21100) of Diwision 13 of the Public Reaourceg code,
ae provided in cacegorical exemption Classes 1, 4, 5,7,8, 9, a:rd or 2L of
the CEQA Guidelines (Tit1e 14, california code of Regrulations, Sectione
1s301-1s329).
SECaION 6. Publlcqtlon/Sumary.
PurBuatrt to the Provisi6as of Government Code Section 35933, a summarT ofthis ordinrnce shall be prepared by che City AtEorney. AE leaeE five (S)
daye prior to the council meeEing aE which this ordinance is echedul.ed to be
adopted, Ehe City Clerk ahall (1) ptrblish the sununary, and (2) post in theCity C3.erk's office a certified copy of this ordinance. I,rithin fifteen (15)
daye after the adoption of thie ordlnance, Ehe cicy C1erk shau (I) publigh
the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk's offioe a oertified copy of thefull text of this ordinance along with the Eames oi tho=" city Couacil
members voElng for and agalnet Ehis ordinance or otherwiee vocing. rhisordinance shall become effective Ehirty (30) days from and after its
adopcion.
Introducod$ie 24th &yoL,2OO2
AYTS, Ciry
fas_ s{-ud1@todaseaOtdinaaceoftheCiryofDalyCityofDalyCiryofDalyGryataregrlarmeeriogofrhe Cfty
council of dre city ofDaly ciu held or the_ ttay of -"**,
iooz-uy oe dlowing rote:
NOES, eiry
Abscnt, City
APPROIY.ED:
7
MAYOR OF II{E CITY OP DALY CITY
CITYCI.ERK OFTTIECITY OFDALY CITY
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
BII,I, NUMBER: SB 773
BILL TEXT
AMENDED
ASSEMBLY AUGUST 31-, 2OO2
ASSEMBLY AUGUST 24, 2OO2
ASSEMBLY AUGUST 22, 2002
ASSEMBLY AUGUST 19, 2OO2
ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER ]-3, 2OO1
ASSEMBI,Y SEPTEMBER 6, 2OO1
ASSEMBI,Y AUGUST 30, 2OOL
ASSEMBLY AUGUST 23, 2OOL
ASSEMBLY JULY 14, 2001.
ASSEMBLY JI]NE 29, 2OOI
ASSEMBLY .ft NE 13 , 2001
SENATE MAY 30, 2OO1
SENATE APRIL 25, 2OOL
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
AMENDED
1N
rN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
]N
IN
IN
Page 1 of 14
INTRODUCED BY Senator Speier end Jlssenrbll' Menlaers UaEien
am.C-#(Irineipal eeauEherr SenaEer Burtsen)
(Frineipal eeautshers r Assen$ly Menleers AlquisE a*C Red
Ir€h.€€I
(eear*Eherer Jlsscrnbll' Mcnibcrs ehanr Chur Cehnr CerbeEtsr
FEBRUARY 23, 2OO]-
An act to add Division 1.2 (commencing with Section 4050) to the
Financial- Code, relating to financial privacy.
LEGTSLATIVE COT'NSELI S DIGEST
SB 773, as amended, Speier. Financial institutions: confidential
consumer information.
Existing 1aw provides for the regulation of banks, savings
associations, credit unions, and industrial loan companies by the
Department of Financial Institutions and by certain federal agencies.
Existing federal J-aw, the Gramm-Leach-Bli1ey Act, requires
financial- institutions to provide a notice to consumers relative to
the use by the financial- institution of nonpublic personal
information, and in that regard authorizes consumers to direct that
the information not be shared with nonaffil-iated third parties.
This bill would enact the California Financial Information Privacy
Act, which would require a financial institution, as defined, to
provide a specified written form to a consumer relative to the
sharing of the consumer's confidential consumer information, as
def i-ned /]
€iraneiaf JnstsitruEien Ee neE share Ehe eenfiCcntriel ecnsumer
i
pE€r'( The bill would
require the permission of the consumer before the financial-
institution coufd share the confidential consumer information with...ct&€- nonaf f if iated companies. The bill wou]d
provide that a financial institution is not required to provide thiswritten form to its consumers if the financial- institution does not
discl-ose any confidential consumer information to any nonaffiliated
3rd party er Ee anl' affiliatse
This bill woufd provide that a financial- institution shall not
deny a consumer a financial product or service because the consumer
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb 0751-0800|sb 773 btll 20020831 amended a 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
has not provided the necessary consent that would authorize the
financial institut.ion to disclose or share confidential consumer
information. The bill woufd require a financj-al- insEitution to
comply with the consumer's request regarding confidentiaf consumer
information within 45 days of receipt of the request.
This bill would provide EhaE Ehe biff weulC neE aPp]}' Ee
insE,iEuEiens anC Eheir affifiaEcs prevideC EhaE eerEain requircmenEs
are meE. Ehe bilf neuld alse pre','iCe that a f inancial-
institution may disclose confidential consumer information to an
affiliate or a nonaffil-iated 3rd party in order for it to perform
certain services on behalf of the financial institution if specified
requirements are met. The bill woufd provide other exceptions from
its provisions applicable to particular situations.
The bill woul-d provide that confidential consumer information may
be released in order to identify or l-ocate missing children,
witnesses, criminals and fugit.ives, parties to fawsuits, and missing
heirs and that it woul-d not change existing law regarding access by
law enforcement agencies to information held by financial
institutions.
The bil-1 would also provide for disclosure of confidenLial
consumer information under various other specified circumsLances.
The bill would provide on January 1, 2003, that enactment of t.hese
provisions preempts all local agency ordinances and regulations
relating to this subject.
The bill would enact other rel-ated provisions.
The bill woufd also provide various civil penalties for negligent,
or knowing and will-ful- violations of these provisions.
The bitl wouId, except as provided above, become operative on
January 1_,2004 ,
except that penalties under the bil-l would not become operative until
July 1 , 2004.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
Stsate-mandated loca1 program: no.
Page 2 of 14
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. Division 1.2 (commencing with SecEion 4050) is added to
the Financial Code, to read:
DIVISION 1.2. CAI,IFORNTA FINANCIAL INFORMATION PRIVACY ACT
4050. This division shal-l- be known and may be cited as the
California Financial- fnformation Privacy Act. This division shal1
beeeme eperatrive en }levenileer 1r 3003r exeepE EhaE SeeEien
4058.5 shaf] beeeme eperaEire er 'anuarl' 1r 2003.
become operative on January 7, 2004.
4051. (a) The Legislature intends for financial- instit.utions to
provide their consumers notice and meanj-ngfu1 choice about how
consumers' personal information is shared or sol-d by their financial-
institutions.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting the Cal-ifornia
Financial- fnformation Privacy Act to afford persons greater privacy
protection than those provided in Public Law 106 -1,02, the federal
Gramm-Leach-81i1ey Act, and that this division be interpreted to be
consistent with that purpose.
4052. For the purposes of this division:(a) "Confidential consumer j-nformatj-on" means personally
identifiabfe financial information (1) provided by a consumer Lo a
financial institution, (2) resulting from any transaction with the
consumer or any serwice performed for the consumer, or (3) otherwise
obtained by the financial institution. Confidential consumer
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill:20020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
information does not incl-ude publicly available information that the
financial institution has a reasonabfe basis to believe is 1awfu11y
. made'available to the general public from (1) federal, state, or
l-ocaI government records, (2) widely distributed media, or (3)
disclosures to the general public lhat are required to be made by
federal-, state, or locaf law. Confidential consumer information
shall include any 1ist, description, or other grouping of consumers,
and publicly available information pertaining to them that is derived
using any nonpublic personal- information other than publicly
availabl-e information, but shal1 not include any l-ist, description,
or other grouping of consumers, and publicly available information
pertaining to them that. is derived wit.hout using any confidential
consumer information.(b) "Personal-1y identifiable financial- information, means
information (1) that a consumer provides to a financial institution
to obtain a product or service from the financial institution, (2)
about a consumer resulting from any transaction involving a product.
or service between the financial instiEution and a consumer, or (3)
that the financial- institution otherwise obtains about a consumer in
connecLion with providing a producL or service to that consumer. Any
personally ident.ifiable information is financial- if it was obtained
by a financial inst.itut.ion in connection wiEh providing a financial-
producE or service to a consumer, including the fact that a consumer
is a cusLomer of a financial institution or has obtained a financial
product or service from a financial institution. Personally
identifiable financial- information includes al-l- of the foll-owing:
(1) Information a consumer provides to a financial- institution on
an application to obtain a 1oan, credit card, or other financial
product or service.(2) Account balance information, pa)rment hist.ory, overdraft.
history and credit or debit card purchase information.
(3) The fact that an individual is or has been a customer of a
financial institution or has obtained a financial product or service
from a financial- institution.(4) Any information about a financial institutionrs consumer if it
is discl-osed in a manner that indicates that the individual is or
has been the financial institutionrs consumer.(5) Any infolmation that a consumer provides to a financial-
instit.ution or that a financial institution or its agent otherwise
obtains in connection with collecting on a foan or seruicing a 1oan.
Page 3 of 14
(5) Any personalJ-y identifiable financial- informat.ion collected
through an fnternet cookie or an information col-lect.ing device from a
Web server.
(7) fnformation from a consumer report.(c) "Financial institutiont' means any institution the business of
which is engaging in financial activities as described in Section
1843 (k) of Titl-e L2 of the United States Code and doing business i-n
this state. An institution that is not significantly engaged in
financial activities is not a financial- institution. The term
"fj-nancial institution" does not include the Federal Agricultural
Mortgage Corporation or any entity chartered and operating under the
Farm Credit Act of 1,971, (l-2 U.S.C. Sec. 2001 et seq.), provided that
the entity does not seII or transfer confj-dential consumer
information to a nonaffiliated third party. The term "financial_institution" does not include institutions chartered by Congress
specifically to engage in a proposed or actua1 securitization,
secondary market sa1e, including sales of servicing rights, orsimilar transactions related to a transaction of the consumer, aslong as those institutions do not sefl- or transfer confidential
consumer information to a nonaffil-iated third party. The term
"financiaf institution,' does not incl-ude any person licensed as adealer under Article 1 (commencing with Section 1l"7OO) of Chapter 4of Division 5 of the Vehicle Code that enters into contracts for the
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilUsen/sb 0751-0800/sb 773 bill 20020831 amended a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
installment sal-e or lease of motor vehicl-es pursuant to the
requirements of Chapter 2b (commencing with Section 2981,) or 2d
(commencing with Section 2985.7) of Ti-tle 14 of Part 4 of Division 3
of the Civil Code and assigns substantially all of those contracts to
financial- institutions within 3O days. The term rrfinanciaf
instiEution', does not incl-ude any provider of profesqional services,
or any who11y owned affil-iate thereof, that is prohibited by rul-es of
professional- ethics or applicable law from voluntarily disclosing
confidentiaf cfient informaEion without the consent of the cfient.
Page 4 of 14
(C) "A€fifiaEe" means anl'enEiEl' tshaE eenErelsr is eenEre]]eC bl'r
er is under eemmen eenEre] wiEh aneEher enEiEi'r buts dees neE inelude
a jeinE enEltel-ee ef Eha enEiEl' *nd Ehc affiliaEc. A franehiserr
inel,uCing anl' affifiaEe Eheraefr shaIl bc Ceemed an ef€iliaEc cf tshe
ie*
cnEitl' fer purpesce ef Ehis Civisicr-E,e Ehe exEcnE EhaE (1) t,he
€inaneial insEiEuEien and iEs affiliaEed enEiEiae are effering
firraneial predueEs er serviees in eenjuneEien wiEh anC as parE ef a
fineneiel aetriviEiesr (Jl) in'resEmenE manager*ents ser,'ieesr {B)
are inEegraEeC and EhaE inEegraEien faeifiEaEes Ehc previsien ef
tAh.e€€....sc=ri.ee+
(d) "Nonaffiliated third partyt' means any entity that is not
an affiliate of, or related by common ownership or affil-iated by
corporate contro1 with, the financial institution, but does not
incl-ude a joint employee of that institution and a third part.y.
4 (e) rrConsumerrr means an individual resident of this state
who obt.ains or has obtained a financial product or service from a
financial institution thaE is to be used primarily for personal,
family, or household purposes, or thaL individual's legal
representative. For purposes of this division, an individuaL
resident of this state is someone whose Last known mailing address,
other than an Armed Forces Post Office or Fleet Post. Office address,
as shown in the records of t.he financial institut.ion, is focated in
this state. For purposes of Ehis division, an individual is not a
consumer of a financial- institution so1e1y because he or she is (1) a
participant or beneficiary of an employee benefit plan that a
financial- institution administers or sponsors, or for which the
financial institution acts as a trustee, insurer, or fiduciary, (2)
covered under a group or blanket insurance policy or group annuity
contracL issued by the financiaL institution, (3) a beneficiary in a
workers' compensation pIan, (4) a beneficiary of a trust for which
the financial institution is a t.rustee, or (5) a person who has
designated the financial institution as trustee for a trust provided
that (A) the financial institution provides all required notices and
rights required by this division to the plan sponsor, group or
blanket insurance policyholder, or group annuity contractholder and(B) the financial institution does not discl-ose to any affiliate or
any nonaffiliated third-party confidential consumer i-nformation about
the individual except as authorized in Section 4056. A consumer
does not incl-ude an individual who obtains products or services for
business, commercial, or agricultural purposes.
-.(€+(t) 'rControlrr means (1) or^mership or power to vote 25
percenE or more of the outstanding shares of any class of voting
security of a company, acting through one or more persons, (2)
control in any manner over the el-ection of a majority of the
directors, or of individuals exercising similar functions, or (3) the
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_billJ002083l_amended_a... 09/3012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
power to exercise, directly or indirectly, a controlling influence
over the management or policies of a company. However, for purposes
of the application of the definition of control as it relates to
credit unions, a credit union has a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a credit union service organization (CUSO),
as that term is defined by state or federal- 1aw or regulation, if
the CUSO is at l-east 67 percent owned by credit unions. For purposes
of the application of the definition of control- to a financial
institution subject to regulation by the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, a person who owns beneficially, either directly
or through one or more controlled companies, more than 25 percent of
the voting securities of a company is presumed to control the
company, and a person who does not own more than 25 percent of the
voting securities of a company is presumed not to control- the
company, and a presumption regarding control may be rebutted by
evidence, but in Ehe case of an investment company, the presumpt.ion
shall continue until t.he United States Securities and Exchange
Commission makes a decision to the contrary according to the
procedures described in Section 2 (a) (9) of Ehe federal Investment
Company Act of a940.
4 (S) rrNecessary to effect, administer, or enforce" means the
following:(1) The disclosure is required, or is a usual, approprj-ate, or
acceptable method to carry out the transaction or the product or
service business of which the transaction is a part, and record or
service or mainLain the consumerrs account in the ordinary course of
providing the financial- service or financial product, or to
administer or service benefits or cl-aims relating to the transaction
or the product or service business of which it is a part, and
incl-udes the following:
(A) Providing the consumer or the consumerrs agent or broker with
a confirmation, statement, or other record of the transaction, or
information on the status or val-ue of the financial service or
financial product.
(B) The accrual or recognition of incentives or bonuses associated
with the transaction or communications to eligible exist.ing
consumers of the financial- institution regarding the availability of
those incenLives and bonuses that are provided by Ehe financiaf
institution or anoEher party.
(C) With respect to a financial- instj-tution that has issued a
credit account bearing the name of a company primarily engaged in
retail sales or a name proprietary to a company primarily engaged in
retail sales, providing the retailer, or Licensees or contractors of
the retailer that provide products or servi-ces in Ehe name of the
retailer and under a contract with the retailer, with confidential
consumer information concerning the credit account in connection with
the marketing or provision of the products or services of Ehe
retailer and those licensees or conLractors.
(2) The discl-osure is required or is one of the lawful- or
appropriate methods to enforce the rights of the financial
institution or of other persons engaged in carrying out the financial
transaction or providing the product or service.(3) The disclosure is required, or is a usua1, appropriate, or
acceptable method for insurance underwriting or the placement of
insurance products by licensed agents and brokers with authorized
insurance companies at the consumer's request, for reinsurance, stop
l-oss insurance, or excess loss insurance purposes, or fer any of the
following purposes as they relate to a consumerrs insurance:
(A) Account administration.
(B) Reporting, investigating, or preventing fraud or material
misrepresentat j-on.
(C) Processing premium pa)rments.
(D) Processing insurance cl-aims.
Page 5 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill_?0020831_amended_a...0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
(E) Ad.ministering insurance benefits, including utilization review
acEivities.(F) Participating in research projects.
(c) As otherwise required or specifically permiEted by federal or
state Iaw.
(4) The disclosure is required, or is a usual, appropriate, or
acceptable method, in connecEion wit.h the following:
(A) The authorization, settlement, bi11ing, processing, clearing,
transferring, reconciling, or col-l-ection of amounts charged, debited,
or otherwise paid using a debit, credit or other payment card,
check, or account number, or by other payment means.
(B) The transfer of receivables, accounts, or interests therein.
(C) The audit of debit, credit, or other pa)rment information.
(5) The discl-osure is required in a transaction covered by the
federal Real- EstaEe SettlemenL Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. Sec. 2501- et
seq. ) in order to offer settlemenE services prior to the cl-ose of
escrow (as those services are defined in l-2 U.S.C. Sec. 2602) ,
provided that (A) the confidential consumer information is disclosed
for the sole purpose of offering those settl-emenE services and (B)
the confidential- consumer information disclosed is l-imited to that
necessary to enabl-e the financial- institution to offer those
settl-ement services.
(h) "Financial product or service" means any product or
service that a financial holding company could offer by engaging in
an activity that is financial in nature or incidental- to a financial
activity under subsection (k) of Section 1843 of Title l-2 of the
United States Code (the United States Bank Holding Company Act of
1955). Financial service incl-udes a financial institution's
evaluation or brokerage of information that. t,he financial institution
col-lects in connection with a request or an application from a
consumer for a financial- product or service.+-j+(i) "C1ear and conspicuous" means that. a notice is
reasonabfy understandable and designed to call attent.ion to the
nature and significance of the information in the notice.
(j) 'rwidely distribut.ed media" means media availabl-e to the
general public and includes a telephone book, a television or radio
program, a newspaper, or a Web site that is avail-ab1e to the general
public on an unrestricLed basis.
4053. (a) A financial institution shall not disclose to, or share
a consumer's confidential- consumer informat.ion with, any
nonaffiliated t.hird party unless the financial institution has
provided wri-tt.en notice pursuant to subdivision (c), to the consumer
to whom the confidential consumer information relates and unl-ess the
financial- institution has obtained a consent acknowl-edgment from the
consumer pursuant to subdivision (c), t.hat authorizes the financial-
institution to disclose or share the confidential consumer
information. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the discl-osure
of confidential consumer information as all-owed in Section 4055. A
financial institution shall not. deny a consumer a financial product
or a financial service because the consumer has not provided the
consent required by Ehis subdivision to authorize the financial
institution to disclose or share his or her confidential consumer
information with any nonaffiliated third party. Nothing in this
section is intended to prohibit a financial- institution from offering
incentives to elj-cit a specific response to the notice.
unfese Ehe finaneial insEitsuEien elear4' and ee*-pieueuefl' neEifies
Ehe eensumer anil*all", eemmeneing en lle-,'endeer 1, 2003, in wriEing Ee
tshe eensumer pursuanE Ee subdivieien (e) trhaE Ltre ia€ermaEien ma)'ba
Page 6 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVserVsb_0751-0800/sb_773_blll_!0020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
eensumer has neE CireeEed EhaE Ehe eenfiCenEial eensumer infermaEien
i
h'e€ause infermaE,i
Catrabasce, and enEllel'ees ef Ehe €inaneiaf insEiEuEien and iEe
affifiaEe have aeecss Ee Ehese eemrncn infermatrien s)'sEems er
daEabases, er a eensumer aeeesses a i'Ieb siEe jeinEll' eperaEed er
mairrtained unCer a eemmen name b}' er en behalf ef Ehe finaneia]
instsiEr*Eien-and iEs affifiaEe(s), pncvided EhaE eenfiCenEia] eensumcr
infermaEien is used er eEherwise diselesed en]l' as permiEEed bl' Ehie
Cir*i-si€tu
(b) (1) Subdivision (a) shall not prohibit the release of
confident.ial- consumer informat.ion by a financial institution with
whom the consumer has a relationship, to a nonaffiliated financiaf
instituEion or institutions for purposes of jointly offering a
financial product or financial service pursuant t.o a written
agreement with the financial institution that receives the
confidential consumer information provided that all- of the following
requirements are met:
(A) The financial product or service offered is a product or
service of, and is provided by, at least one of the financial-
institutions that is a party to the written agreement.
(B) The financial product or service is jointly offered, endorsed,
or sponsored, and cl-early and conspicuously identifies for the
consumer the financial institutions that release the confidential
consumer information and the financial institutions that receive that
information.
(C) The written agreement provides that the financial- institution
that receives that confidenEial consumer information is required to
maintain Ehe confidentiality of the information and is prohibited
from disclosing or using the information other than to carry ouE Ehe
joint offering or servicing of a financial product or financial
service that is the subject of the written agreement.
(D) Ehe finaneial i
eensgme-;i
i+(D) Notwithstanding this section, until .Tanuary 1, 2004, a
financial instit.ution may disclose confidential consumer j-nformation
to a nonaffiliated financial- instit,ution pursuants to a preexisting
contract with the nonaffil-iated financial- institution, for purposes
of offering a financial product or financial service, if that.
contract was entered into on or before January 1, 2003. Beginning on
January 1, 2004, no confidential- consumer information may be
disclosed pursuanE to Ehat contract unl-ess all- the requirements of
this subdivision are met.+(2) Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit a financj-al
institution from discl-osing or sharing confidential- consumer
information as otherwise specifically permitted by this division.
(c) (1) The form set forth in this subdivision, or one
substantially simil-ar sha1l be sent by the financial- institution to
the consumer so that the consumer may make a decision and provide
direction to the financia1 institution regarding the sharing of his
or her confidential consumer information. A form shall- not be deemed
substantially simifar for purposes of this subdivision unl-ess at
feast afl of the fol-lowing requirements are met:
(A) The form uses the same titl-e ("fMPORTANT PRTVACY CHOICES FOR
CALfFORNfANS") and headers (headings designated in al-l- capital
letters in the form set forth be1ow, such as "SHARING fNFORMATION
WITH AFFILIATED COMPANIES'') .
PageT oft4
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilUsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill_20020831_amended a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
(B) The titles and headers in the form are clearly and
conspicuously displayed, and no text in the form is smaffer than
, 10-point type.
(C) The form is a separate document.
(2) (A) None of the instructional items appearing in parentheses
in the form set forth below shall appear in the form provided to the
consumer, as Ehose it.ems are for explanation purposes onIy. If a
financial institution does not disclose or share confidentiaf
consumer information as described in any one or more of the first
three headers of the form, the financial institut.ion is not required
to incl-ude the applicable header or headers, and the accompanying
information and box, in the form it provides pursuanL to this
subdivision.(B) rf a eensumer sefectss Ehe bex asseeiaEcC wiEh Ehc hcader
resErieEing in€ermaEien sharing Ee Ehe greaEesE exEenE effevred br"
lartr Eh+E eheiee shal] superscCe all eEhcr eheiees.
(B) A financial institution shal-I not be in violaLion of
this subdivision solely because it includes in the form one or more
brief examples or explanations of the purpose or purposes, or
conEext, within which information wil-l- be shared.+(c) The outside of the envelope in which the form is sent.
shal-l clearly state in l-6-point boldface type "IMPORTANT PRIVACY
CHoICES,rr except that a financial institution sending Lhe form to a
consumer in the same envelope as a bill or account sLatement does not
have to include the wording "IMPORTANT PRIVACY CHOICES" on that
envelope. The form shall be sent in any of the following ways:
(i) with a bilf or other sEatement of account, in which case the
information required by Title V of the Gramm-Leach-B1i1ey Act may
also be included.
(ii) As a separate notice or with the information required by
Titl-e V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and including only information
related to privacy.
(iii) with any other mailing, in which case it shall be the first
page of Ehe mailing.
(3) The consumer shaLl- be provided an opportunity, before
disclosure of information pursuant to this division, for 45 days from
the date of postmark or other postal verification of mailing of the
initial notice required by this subdivision, to direct that the
confidentiaf consumer information not be disclosed except as
otherwise permitted by this division. A consumer may direct aL any
time that his or her confidential- consumer information not be
disclosed, except as otherwise permitted by this division. A
financial institution shal-1 comply with a consumer's directions
concerning the sharing of his or her confidential consumer
information within 45 days of receipt by the financial institution.
When a consumer directs that confidential consumer i-nformation not be
disclosed, that direction is in effect until otherwise stated by the
consumer.(4) A financial institution shall- not deny a consumer a financial
product or a financial service because the consumer has directed
pursuant to subdivision (b) that his or her confidential consumer
information not be disclosed provided that nothing in this section
sha11 prohibit the discLosure of confidential- consumer information
al-lowed by Section 4056. Nothing in this section is intended to
prohibit a financiaf institution from offering incenti-ves to elicit a
specific response to the notice.(5) A financial institution may elect to comply with the
requirements of subdivision (a) with respect to disclosure of
confidential consumer information to an affiliate or with respect to
confidential consumer information disc1osed pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (b) .(6) If a financial- institution does not have a continuing
Page 8 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pubibilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_blll_?0020831_amended_a...0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
refationship with a consumer other than the initial transaction in
which t.he product or servlce is provided, no annual discl-osure
'requirement. exists pursuant to this section as long as the financial
institution provides the consumer wiEh the form required by this
section at the time of the initiaf transaction. As used in this
section, "annualIy" means at least once in any period of L2
consecutive months during which that rel-ationship exists - The
financial- institution may define Lhe 12-consecutive-month period, but
shall apply it to the consumer on a consistent basis. If , for
example, a financial institut.ion defines the l-2-consecutive-month
period as a cafendar year and provides the annual- not.ice to the
consumer once in each cal-endar year, it compl-ies wit.h the requirement
to send the notice annua11y.
(7) A financiaf institution with assets in excess of twenty-five
million dol-lars ($25,000,000) shal-I incl-ude a seff-addressed postage
paid return envel-ope with the notice. A f inancial inst,itution wit.h
assets of up to and including twenty-five million dol-l-ars
(g25,ooo,ooo) shall- include a self-addressed return envelope with the
notice. fn addition to the return envelope required by this
paragraph, a financial- institution may offer additional means for
consumers to communicate their privacy choices, included, but not
limited to, calling a toll--free number, sending a facsimiLe, or using
electronic means. A financial institution shaLf clearly and
conspicuously discfose in the form required by this subdivision the
information necessary to direct the consumer on how to communicate
his or her choices, including the Eol-f-free or facsimil-e number or
Web site address that may be used, if those means of communication
are offered by the financial institution.
(8) A financial- institution shall file a copy of the initial
notice or notices required by this subdivision wit.h the Attorney
General. No subsequent filing is required unEil the financial-
institution modifies the notice, in which case a copy of t.he notice
as modified shall be fi1ed with the AtLorney General-. Nothing in
t.his paragraph shall- be construed to require that a financiaf
institution file with the Attorney General- a copy of the notice or
notices it provides to consumers more often than once in each
calendar year. The interpretations of functional
regulators regarding the form required by
this subdivision are not entitled to deference by a court.
(d) Nothing in this division shalI prohibit a financial
institution from marketing its own products and services or the
products and services of affiliates or nonaffil-iated third parties to
customers of the financial- institution as long as (1) confidential
consumer information is not disclosed in connection with the delivery
of the applicable marketing materials to those customers except as
permitted by Section 4055 and (2\ in cases in which the applicable
nonaffiliated third party may extrapolate confidential consumer
information about the consumer responding to those markeEing
material-s, the applicable nonaffil-iated third party has signed a
contract with the financial institution under the terms of which (A)
the nonaffiliated third party is prohibited from retaining or using
that information for any purpose, and (B) the financial institution
has the right by audit, inspections, or other means to verify the
nonaffiliated third party's compliance with that contract.
4053.5. Except as otherwise provided in this division, an entity
that receives confidentiaf consumer information from a financi-al
institution under this division shall- not discl-ose this information
to any other entity, unless the disclosure would be 1awful- if made
directly to the other entity by the financial institution. An entity
that receives confidential consumer information pursuant to any
exception set forth in Sectj-on 4055 shal1 not use or discl-ose the
information except in the ordinary course of business to carry out
the activity covered by the exception under which the information was
received.
Page9 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill_20020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
4054. (a) Not.hing in this division shal-l- require a f inancial-
institution to provide a written notice to a consumer pursuant Lo
Section 4053 if the financial institution does noL disclose
confidential consumer information to any nonaffil-iated third party or
to any affiliate, except as al-fowed in this division.
(b) A notice provided to a member of a household pursuant to
Section 4053 shall be considered notice to afl members of that
househol-d unless that household contains another individuaf who also
has a separate account with the financiaf institution.
(c) (1) The requirement to send a wriEten notice to a consumer may
be fulfiIled by elect.ronic means if the following requirements are
met:
(A) The notice, and the manner in which it is sent, meets all of
the requirements for notices that are required by l-aw to be in
writing, as set forth in Section 101- of the federal Electronic
Signatures in Globa1 and National Commerce Act.
(B) A11 other requirements applicabl-e to the notice, as set forth
in this division, are met, including but noE fimited to, requirements
concerning content, timing, form, and delivery.
(C) The notice shal-l- be del-ivered to the consumer in a form the
consumer may keep.
(2) A notice that is made available to a consumer, and j-s not
delivered to the consumer, does not satisfy the requirements of
paragraph (1).
(3) Any electronic consumer reply Lo an electronic notice sent
pursuant to this division is effective. A person that electronically
sends a notice required by this division to a consumer may not by
contract, or otherwise, eliminate the effectiveness of Ehe consumerrs
elecLronic reply.
(4) This division modifies the provisions of Section l-01 of the
federal El-ectronic Signatures in Global and National- Commerce Act.
However, it does not modify, limit, or supersede the provisions of
subsection (c), (d), (e), (f), or (h) of Section 101 of the federal-
Elect.ronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, nor does
it authorize electronic delivery of any notice of the type described
in subsection (b) of Section 103 of that federal act.
4054.6. When a financial institution and a membership
organization, tax-exempt organization, not-for-profit organization,
or a professional sports team that is not a financial- institution
have an agreement to issue a credit card in the name of the
membership organization, tax-exempt organization, noE-for-profit
organization, or Lhe professional sporEs team ("affinity card"), the
financial institut.ion shalI be permitted to disclose to the entity in
whose name the card is issued, the names and addresses, including
electronic mail addresses, of the financial- inst.itution's consumers
in receipt of the affinity card if all- of the fol1owing requirements
are satisfied:(a) The financial instiEution has a contractual agreement with the
membership organization, tax-exempt organization, not-for-profit
organization, or professional sports team that requires the entity in
whose name the affinity card is issued to maintain the
confidentiality of the confidential consumer information and
prohibits the entity in whose name the affinity card is issued from
using the information for any purposes other than verifying
membership, verifying the affinity cardholder's address or offeringi
the entity's own products or services to the cardholder. Nothing in
this section shall prohibit the disclosure of confidential consumer
information allowed by Section 4056.
(b) The customer list is not disclosed in any way that revea1s or
permits extrapolation of any additional confidential- consumer
information about any customer on the list.(c) ff the entity in whose name the card is issued sends any
message to any electronic mail addresses obtained pursuant to this
secti-on, the message sha11 include at least both of the following:
Page 10 of14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill_!0020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
(1) The identity of the sender of the message.
(2) A cost-free means for the recipient to noEify the sender noL
to electronically mail any further messages to the recipienE-
Page 11 of14
4055, {a} This di'risien shal} neE aPPf}' tse disefesuras beEween a
menlaer ewneC Einaneia] insEiEuE,ien and iE,s affiLiaEcs, er beEwecn
eusEemcr scriiee purpeses and neE fer marhcEing purpesesr anC tshaE
E,hc finaneiat instsitsuEien meeEs afl ef Eh* fefferting rcquirementss:
(1) A rnajeriEl'ef Ehe fineneiaf in-EitsuEien's eensumers are
menleers ef trhe UnitseC SEaEes miliEarl' scr-"ieesr ycEcrans ef tshe
depenCcntrs ef Ehesc persens and Ehc primarl- purpesc elEhe finaneiaf
institueien iE Eo h€€€--P.r.s€n"L
{3) rhe finaneia} insEitsuEien *nd iEs affiliaEes are in eenp}ianee
rrlit&-E-i+.t€-Ii+f- Eh. f scrra] Sinan
(3) Censumcrs ef tshc €inaneial insEiEutien anC iEs af€iliatscs ane
cf infermaEien sharing ameng Ehe insEiEutsien and iEs affiliatscs €er
marheEing purpeses.
(b) Fer purpesas ef tshis seeEienr "markeEing purpeees" means fer
usc in unsefieiEeC EelemarkcEingr unsefieiEeC CireeE mail, er
unselieiEad eemmereial efeeEre*ie maif fer Ehe primarl'purpese ef
enceuraging Ehe purehase er rcntra] efr cr invcsEmenE inr prcPcrEl'r
geeCsr er serviees. Fcr purpcscs ef Ehis seeEienr "marlietsing
eemmunieaEien frem sueh persen.
4056. (a) This division shal-l- not apply to informat.ion that is
not personally identifiable to a particular person.
(b) Sections 4053 and 4054 shal-I not prohibit the release of
confidential- consumer information under the following circumstances:
(1) The confidential consumer information is necessary to effect,
administer, or enforce a transacLion requested or aut.horized by the
consumer, or in connection with servicing or processing a financial-
product or service requested or authorized by the consumer, or in
connection with maintaining or servicing the consumer's account with
the financial- instituEion, or with another entity as part of a
private label credit card program or other extension of credit on
behal-f of such entity, or in connection with a proposed or actual-
securitization or secondary market sal-e, including sales of servicing
rights, or similar transactions related to a transaction of t.he
consumer.
(2) The confidential consumer information is rel-eased with the
consent of or at the direction of the consumer.
(3) The confidential consumer information j-s:
(A) Refeased Eo protect the confidentiality or security of the
financial- institutionts records pertaining to the consumer, the
service or product, or the transaction therein.
(B) Released to protect against or prevent actual or potential
fraud, identity theft, unauthorized transactions, claims, or other
liability.
(C) Released for required institutional risk control, or for
resolving customer disputes or inquiries.
(D) Rel-eased to persons holding a 1ega1 or beneficial- interest
relating to the consumer, including for purposes of debt collection.
(E) Rel-eased to persons acting in a fiduciary or representative
capacity on beha1f of the consumer.
(4) The confidential- consumer j-nformation is released to provide
information to insurance rate advisory organizations, guaranty funds
or agencies, applicable rating agencies of the financial institution,
persons assessj-ng the institution's complj-ance with industry
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill_20020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
shall not exceed five hundred thousand dol-Lars
occurrence.
Page 14 of14
( $s00, 000 ) per
(b) An entity that knowingly and wil-l-fu11y obtains, discloses,
shares, or uses confidentj-al consumer information in violation of
this division shall be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed two
thousand five hundred doflars ($2,500) per violation.
(c) In determining the penalty to be assessed pursuant to a
violation of this division, the court shal1 take into account the
following factors:
(1) The tot.al assets and net worth of the violating entity.
(2) The nature and seriousness of the viol-ation.
(3) The persistence of the violation, incfuding any attempts to
correct the situation leading to the viol-ation.
(4) The length of time over which the violation occurred.
(5) The number of times the entity has viofated Ehis division.
(6) The harm caused to consumers by the violation.
(7) The l-evel of proceeds derived from the violation.
(8) The impact of possible penaLties on the overall- fiscal
solvency of the violating entity.
(d) In the event a violation of this division resul-ts in the
identity theft of a consumer, as defined by Section 530.5 of the
Penal- Code, the civil penalties set forth in this section shal-l be
doubled.(e) This section shall become operative on and after 'Ju1y 1 , 2004,
for acts in viol-ation of this division that occur on and after .Tu1y
L, 2OO4.
4058. This division sha1l not be construed in a manner thaE is
inconsisLent with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.s.C.
Sec. 1681 et seq.).
4058.5. Nothing in this division shall be construed as altering
or annu1ling the auLhority of any department or agency of the state
to regulate any financial institution subject to its jurisdiction.
4058.6. This division shall preempt and be excl-usive of all local
agency ordinances and regulations relating to the use and sharing of
confidential consumer information by financial- institutions. This
section shall apply both prospectively and retroactively.
4059. The provisions of t.his division shal-I be severable, and if
any phrase, clause, sentence, or provision is declared to be inval-id
or is preempt.ed by federal- law or regulation, the validity of the
remainder of this division shall not be affected thereby.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_blll_20020831_amended_a...0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
standards, and the institution's attorneys, accountants, and
auditors.(5) The confidential consumer information is released to the
extent specifically required or specifically permitted under other
provisions of law and in accordance with the Right to Financial-
Privacy Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. Sec. 3401 et seq.), to 1aw enforcement
agencies, including a federaf functional regulator, the SecreLary of
the Treasury with respect to subchapter II of Chapter 53 of TiEle
31, and Chapter 2 of Title I of Pubfic Law 91-508 (12 U.S.C. Secs.
1951-1959), the California Department of Insurance or other state
insurance regulators, or the Federal Trade Commission, and
self-regulatory organizations, or for an investigation on a matter
re1ated to public safety.
(5) The confidential- consumer informat.ion is rel-eased (A) Lo a
consumer reporting agency in accordance with the Fair CrediL
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1-581 et seq. ) ; or (B) from a consumer
report reported by a consumer reporting agency.
(7) The confidential consumer information is rel-eased in
connection with a proposed or actuaL sal-e, mergJer, transfer, or
exchange of all or a portion of a business or operating unit if the
disclosure of confidential consumer information concerns so1e1y
consumers of the business or unit.
(8) The confident.ial- consumer information is refeased to comply
with federal-, state, or local laws, rules, and other applicable Iega1
requirements,' to comply with a properly authorized civil, criminal,
administrative, or regulatory investigation or subpoena or summons by
federal-, state, or local authorities; or Eo respond to judicial
process or governmenE regulatory authorities having jurisdicti-on over
the financial institution for examination, compliance, or other
purposes as authorized by law.
(9) When a financial instiLuEion is reporting a known or suspected
instance of elder or dependent adulE financial- abuse or is
cooperating with a local aduft protective services agency
investigation of known or suspected elder or dependent. adult.
financial abuse pursuant to ArLicle 3 (commencing with Section 15630)
of Chapter l-L of Part 3 of oivision 9 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code.
(10) The confidential consumer information is released to an
affiliate or a nonaffil-iated third party in order for the affiliate
or nonaffiliated third party to perform services, such as mailing
services, data processing or analysis, or customer surveys, on behaff
of the financial- institution, provided that al-l- of the following
requirements are met:
(A) The services to be performed by the affiliate or nonaffiliated
third party cou1d Iawful1y be performed by Ehe financial-
inst.itution.
(B) There is a written contract between the affiliate or
nonaffiliated third party and the financial institution that
prohibits the affiliate or nonaffiliated third party, as the case may
be, from disclosing or using the confidential consumer informat.ion
other than to carry out the purpose for which the financial
institution discl-osed the information, as set forth in the written
contract.
(C) The confidenEial- consumer information provided to the
affiliate or nonaffiliated third party is limited to that which is
reasonabl-y necessary for the affiliate or nonaffiliated third party
to perform the servj-ces contracted for on behalf of the financial
institution.
(D) The financial institution does not receive any pa).ment from or
through the affiliate or nonaffiliated third party j-n connection
with, or as a result of, the release of the confidential consumer
information.
(11) The confi-dential consumer information j-s released to identify
or locate mj-ssing and abducted children, witnesses, criminals and
Page 12 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_bill:20020831_amended_a... 0913012002
SB 773 Senate Bill - AMENDED
fugitives, parties to lawsuits, parents delinquent in child support
payments, organ and bone marrow donors, pension fund beneficiaries,
' and inissing heirs.
(\2) The confidential consumer information is released to a reaL
estate appraiser licensed or certified by the state for submission to
centra1 data repositories such as the California Market DaEa
Cooperative, and Ehe confidenLial consumer information is compiled
strictly to complete other real estate appraisal-s and is not used for
any other purpose.
(13) The confidential consumer information is released as required
by Title 11r of the federal united and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and ObsLruct
Terrorism Act of 2001- (USA Patriot. AcE; P.L. L07 -56) .
(c) Not.hing in this division is intended Lo change existing 1aw
relating to access by 1aw enforcement agencies to informaEion held by
financial instiEutions.
4056.5. (a) The provisions of this division do not apply to any
person or entity that meets the requirements of paragraph (1) or (2)
bel-ow. However, when confidential consumer information is being or
will be shared by a person or entity meeting the requirements of
paragraph (1) or (2) with an affiliate or nonaffil-iated third party,
this division shal1 app1y.
(1) The person or entity is licensed in one or both of the
following categories and is acting within the scope of the respective
license or certificate:
(A) As an insurance producer, licensed pursuant to Chapter 5
(commencing with Section 1.621"), Chapter 5 (commencing with Section
1-'760), or Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 1831) of Division 1 of
the Insurance Code, as a registered investment adviser pursuant to
Chapter 3 (commencing with SecEion 25230) of Part 3 of Division 1 of
Titl-e 4 of the Corporat.ions Code, or as an investment adviser
pursuant to Section 202 (a) (11) of the federal fnvestment Advisers Act
of 1940.
(B) Is 1icensed to se1I securiEies by the National- Association of
SecuriEies Deafers (NASD) .
(2) The person or entity meets the requirements in paragraph (1)
and has a wrj-t.ten conEractual agreement with another person or entity
described in paragraph (1) and the contract clearly and explicitly
includes the fol-l-owing:
(A) The rights and obligations between the licensees arising out
of the business rel-ationship relating to insurance or securities
transactions.
(B) An explicit limitation on the use of confidential- consumer
information about, a consumer to transactions authorized by the
contract and permitted pursuant to this division.
(C) A requirement that transactions specified in the contract fal1
within the scope of activities permitted by the licenses of the
parties.
(b) The restrict.ions on disclosure and use of confidential
consumer information, and t.he requirement for notification and
discl-osure provided in this division, shal-l- not limit the ability of
insurance producers and brokers to respond to written or el-ectronic,
including telephone, requests from consumers seeking price quotes on
insurance products and services or to obtain competitive quotes to
renew an existing insurance contract, provided that any confidential-
consumer information disclosed pursuant to this subdivision shall not
be used or disclosed except in the ordinary course of business in
order to obtai-n those quotes.
4057. (a) an entity that negligently discloses or shares
confidenti-al consumer information in viol-ation of this division sha]1
be l-iable, irrespective of the amount of damages suffered by the
consumer as a result of that viol-atJ-on, for a civil- penalty not to
exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per vioLation.
However, the total civif penalty awarded pursuant to this subdivision
Page 13 of 14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_0751-0800/sb_773_blllJ002083l amended_a...09130/2002
STAFF REPORT
/o-3- nL
Mayor Mary
AGENDA 8iITEM #
MTG.
DATE rolT lo2
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
sUBJECT: Support for Measure C
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution supporting Measure C on the
November Ballot, which would arfihonze the San Mateo Union High School District to use Measure D Funds
for demolition and construction projects at Burlingame High School and other district sites.
BACKGROUND: The voters of the San Mateo Union High School District adopted Measure D in November
of 2000. The San Mateo Superior Court has since determined that Measure D did not give clear notice to
voters that some of the bond proceeds would be used for demolition or replacement of school buildings.
Therefore, the district has put Measure C to the voters at the November 2002 election to clearly authorize the
district Board of Trustees to use the proceeds from Measure D the for demolition and replacement of district
buildings and necessary site preparation.
As the council knows from a presentation made in recent months by Supt. Tom Moore, improvements to the
Burlingame high school campus are in the planning stages and will be implemented beginning early in 2003.
The successful passage of Measure C will allow for use of measure D money for these important
improvements to the public facilities available at Burlingame High School.
Exhibits
A. Letter from the Ron Cox, Mayor of Foster City, urging of the Burlingame City Council to adopt a similar
resolution to one that was adopted by the Foster City Council.
I
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COT'NCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME URGING
SUPPORT OF MEASURE C AUTHORIZING BOND PROCEEDS HELD BY
THE SAN MATEO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BE USED TOR
DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR SITE PREPARATION
WHEREAS, Measure D adopted by the voters of the San Mateo Union High School
District in November 2000 provided for the renewal of the six high schools in the District to
provide a safe and healthy learning environment for our children; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo Superior Court has determined that Measure D did not give
clear notice to the voters that some of the bond proceeds would be used for demolition or
replacement of school buildings; and
WHEREAS, demolition and replacement of certain structures at Burlingame High
School is a key component of revitalizing the campus and sensitively bringing the School's
facilities into the new century; and
WHEREAS, the District has submitted a measure to the voters at the November 2002
election to clearly authorize the Districts Board of Trustees to use the proceeds from Measure D
for demolition and replacement of District buildings and necessary site preparation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The City Council urges citizens to vote in favor of Measure C for the San Mateo
Union High School District, and support the renovations and repairs at Burlingame High School
that will be funded by that measure.
Mayor
I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certiff that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _
day of _,2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COTINCILMEMBERS:
Measure C - November 2002
City Clerk
6rry,/%b?,6@
?ESTERO MUNICIPAL TMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
610 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD
FOSTER
"rry,
9A94494-2c22
(650) 286-3200
FAX (6s0) s74-3483 l^l
RECEIVED
.l'i::ir i.l .-i - . -,.,
g,,#gFHlfii,$6[]fiE
#r
September l9,2AA2
Mayor Mary Jarurey
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Nlayor Janney:
The Foster City City Council at its September 17 Regular Meeting passed the attached
resolution supporting Measure C on the November 5 ballot which would authorize the
San Mateo Union High School District to use bond funds already approved by Measure D
on Novemb er 7,2000 for construction-related expenses at the District's six
comprehensive high schools.
I am writing to urge your city to pass a similar resolution to encourage all registered
voters in the boundaries of the San Mateo Union High School District to vote in favor of
Measure C.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (650) 286-3220 or
rcox@fostercitv.org.
Sincerely,
Cox DISTRIBUTION:
Mayor
t?1-,
Council
Manager
Attomey ! No Response Required
please respond
D Dir. Finance
fl City P'lanner
O Dir. Public Works
O Human Resources
O Police Chief
D Fire Chief
.B Parks & Rec
O Librarian
O On Nexl Agenda
PLEASE SEND A COPY OF
YOUR RESPONSE TO THE
CITY CLERK
7t"
RESOLUTION NO. 2OO2-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTJNCIL OF THE CiTY OF FOSTER CITY
SL"PORTiNG MEASIIRE C ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 2OO2 BALLOT WHICH
WOLJLD AUTHORIZE THE SAN MATEO {..]'NION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO
USE BOND FL}IDS AIREADY APPROVED BY MEASIjRE D ON NOVEMBER 7,
2OOO FOR CONSTRUCTION-RELATED EXPENSES AT THE DISTRICT'S SIX
COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOLS INCLTIDING THE REMOVAL OR
REPLACEMENT OF OUTMODED OR T]}ISAFE BUILDN{GS
CITY OF FOSTER CITY
WHEREAS, the voters approved Measure D on the November 7, 2000 ballot that
provided for the issuance of S137,500,000 in bonds to fund construction-related expenses
at the six comprehensive high schools in the San Mateo Union High School Disrrict; and
\WIEREAS, a group entitled "Save San Mateo High Schooll" filed a legal challenge and
won a ruling in Superior Court that the language included in Measure D allowed for
repair and reconstruction of buildings but did not allow for removal and replacement of
buildings; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has gone on record supporting the removal and
replacement of San llateo High School as the best and most responsible alternative
studied in the Environmenlal lmpact Report; and
WHEREAS, this City Council agrees that the District Board should have the authority to
expend the bond funds authorized by Measure D to remove and replace outmoded or
unsafe buiidings if it is deemed to be in the best interest of the students and the public;
and
WHEREAS, Measure C on the November 5, 2A02 ballot would clarify the intent of the
voters and provide said authority to the District Board and *'ould not authorize any
additional bonds or create an additional financial burden on the taxpayers.
NOW, T HEREFORE, B E IT R ESOLVED t hat t he C ity C ouncil o f t he City o f Foster
City hereby supports Measure C on the November 5,2002 and encourages all registered
voters in the boundaries of the San Mateo Union High School District to vote in favor of
Measure C.
PASSED AND ADOPTED as a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foster City
at the regular meeting held on the 17th day of September, 2OO2,by the following vote:
Reso'l uti on No. 2002-85
Councilmembers Harter, Townsend, l'lilder, Hykoff, and l'layor Cox
None
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: None
ARSTAIN' None
ATTEST:
RON COX,
TAHIR,CLERK
(*
Meeting g21s:,7E1
$3,369,834.53
Ck. No. 84466 - 85063
Excludes Library cks. 84591 - 84641
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for August 2002
$2,625,161.55
Ck. No. 149840 - 150632
.EFTS for August 2002
$533,692.77
-ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding
SDI (State Disability)
PERS- Health Benefits
Retirement
'c
09-06-2002
TIIIS IS TO
I}ICLUSIVE,
TltE Ar,rou[T
0tF I clALs.
ACCORDANCE
CITY OF BURLINGAI4E
UARRANT REEISTER
FUND RECAP . O2.O3
PAGE 7
AMOUNTIIAMEFUND
GENERAL FUND
CAPI TAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
UATER CAPI TAL PROJECT FUIID
SEIIER CAPITAL PROJECT FUNO
IIATER FUI'IO
SEIIER FUND
GOLT CENTER FUND
SELF INSURAIICE FUND
FACI LITIES SERVI CES FUND
EOUIPMEI'IT SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
BURLINGAI.IE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRATI
UTILITY REVOLVING FUIID
101
320
326
327
526
s27
529
618
619
620
621
731
736
896
48,723.78
108,943.67
25.00
27?,81A.36
17 ,909 ,39
6,806,64
2,500,00
3 ,307 ,31
3,590.84
27 ,227 .89
235 ,021 .58
32.15
1 ,819.20
IOIAL fOR APPROVAL $729,498.49
HOiIORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIIY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBERED FROM 1 THRO{',GII 7
Ai,IDIOR CLAII.IS NUI.{BERED FROI.I 84981 THROIJGH 85063 I}ICLUSIVE,TOTALIiIG IN
OF 5729,198.49, HAVE BEEN CIIECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AIIO IN MY OPINION REPRESENT TAIR ANO JUST CIIARGES AGAIIIST TIIE CITY II,I
U'ITH ]HEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREOII.
RESPECTTULLY SUB}IITTED,
TINANCE DIRECTOR OATE
APPROVED FOR PAYITIEI'IT
cou cI L DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAI.{EL'ARRANT REGISTER
09 t06t02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks
PAGE 6
3,760.68
1,450.00
27 ,23
2,960.00
1,810.00
8,290.00
5 ,377 .A1
720 -93
641 .25
1 ,421.94
?91 .85
$729 ,198.49
PACI FIC BE L L/I'OR LO COI,i
UTILITY EXPEI,ISE
85056 MAO SCIENCE OF TIIE BAY AREA
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
UN I OI,I ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
KATIILEEI,I DORE PROPERTIES
REI,ITS & LEASES
SFPUC I.'ATER OUALITY BUREAU
t.I I SCELLAIIEOUS
I'ILS CAMPS
CO}./TRACTUAL SERVICES
UALTER I S SI,/IM SUPPLIES, INC.
I.IISCELLANEOUS
PACIFIC RII.I LOCKSI'I I T I{
ISCELLAilE0US
JOE H. HENDERSON
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
THOiIAS I{EATON
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
GEORGE EARRY
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
3,760,68 3?0 a0190 220
1,/r50.00 320 760'10 '180
27.23 896 20281
2,960.00 ',t01 68010 220 1349
1,840.00 526 69020 233
8,290.00 101 68010 220 1372
5,377,81 101 68010 100 1111
720.93 619 64460 100
68't.25 101 64350 210
366.50
1,055.44
101 55200 111
'tot 65200 400
291.85 101 55500 120
NUI,4BER NAI.IE
85053
85051
8t055
85057
85058
85059
E5060
85061
85062
85063
TOTAL
23572
?3622
23728
23811
23846
24875
23912
23913
23914
23915
A}'IOUNT
23916
CITY OF BURLINGA}IE[,ARRANT REGISTER
09/06/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
66,092.71
813,44
73.16
131.59
300.00
232.71
359,59
150.00
548,00
1,236.18
49.00
1 ,353.13
25 .53
5,818.63
NUI,IBER }IAI4E
85038
85039
85040
E5041
85042
85043
85044
85015
85046
85048
85019
85050
85051
COIPAA COiIPUTER CORPORAT IOX
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
101 65200 800
320 80420 800
621 61450 800
59
00
101 65100 110
101 65100 220
GI.{AC PAYI.IENT PROCESSING CENTER
MISC. SUPPLIES
Z.A.P. iIANUFACTURING
TRAFT I C COIITROL I.IATERIALS
LAB SATETY SUPPLY, INC.
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAINT.
0A RA00S
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
PITNEY BOIJES INC
OFFICE EXPEIISE
II.IAGTSTTCS I NTERNAT IO}IAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
JOE BOJUES
DEPOSIT REFUNOS
21999
22006
22219
2263?
22872
2287A
22921
23071
23128
23153
23169
23181
23329
2,639.52
60,301.71
s,1r1.15
843.44 101 66',100 120
73.16 101 66210 222
134.59 10',1 65200 203
500.00 731 22520
232,74 621 61150 110
67
292
PITNEY BOUES
CITY IIALL I.{AINTE}IANCE
85017 ott tcE DEPor
OTFI CE EXPENSE
AT&T !'IRELESS
CO.II{UN I CAT IONS
24 HR TITNESS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
150.00 731 22520
548.00 621 61450 200
1,236.18 '101 580',I0 1'10 1101
19,00 10't 65200 160
1,353.13 101 64420 210
25.53 101 65200 110
5,818.65 320 75110 210
BOISE CASCAOE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OIFICE EXPENSE
IIARRIS DESIGN
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
85052 REPUSLIC ELECTRIC
CAPITAL EOUI PI4ENT
23382 6,434.02 529 68030 800
6,434,02
CI TY OF BURLIilGAI.,IEIIARRANT REGISTER
09 /06t02
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hahd L/ritten checks
PAGE 4
EL CAI.II NO CHARTER LINES INC
I.I I SC, SUPPLIES
85026 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS
cor,ft,tuN I cAT I 0N s
NUI.IEER NAIIE
85025
850?7
85028
85031
85032
8t033
85036
AT&T [IIRELESS
cofir'ruI I cAT t oll s
cor.r4utt I cAt I 0|l s
RACOUET SIiIITH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ACCOUNT
379.89 101 68010 120 ',I521
83
32
101 55100 160
736 64571 160
3,110.40 101 58010 220 1782
128.00 320 79020 210
20105
20216
20301
?0339
20376
?0706
20724
?0781
21177
21289
21317
21517
- 49 .26
156.97
189.29
-33.42
438.42
-2.23
29.21
?3611
&250 110
&350 100
23611
69020 120
23611
64450 110
AII1OUNT
379.a9
220.00
115.88
3,110.10
128.00
1 ,028.98
I ,791 .97
2,181 .00
760.00
2,207 .0a
1 ,15?,36
300.00
220.00 621 64150 160
T3
'15
85029 lroLTE & ASSOCIATES, r[C.
PiOFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
85030 MICRO IJAREHOUSE
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
OFFICE EXPENSE
I.I I SCELLATIEOUS
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
II I SC. SUPPL!ES
},I I SCELLANEOUS
OTFICE EXPENSE
101
101
101
,?6
526
621
6?1
85034 TEHR AND PEERS ASSOCIATES, tNC.
PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIZED S
85035
SPRI NT PCS
tJT I LITY EXPENSE
IBS BUILDING I.,IAINTEilANCE CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
PEEK TRAFF IC
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
LARRY I4ORSELLO
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
1,791.97 896 20281
2,181.00 619 61460 220 51A0
760.00 101 61560 210
2,207.08 101 61100 210
1,152.36 320 80?31 210
300.00 731 22516
85037 CINGULAR I'IRELESS
co ltuN I cAT Io s
21717 600.11 101 66100 160
600.11
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEt,JARRANT REGISTER
09/06/02
VEiIDOR DETAI Lrrr Denotes Hand lrritten Checks
PAGE 3
NUMEER IIAME
85010
85011
85012
85013
850',!4
85015
850'18
85019
85021
85022
85023
DOUBLETREE HOTEL
TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS
I.IUNICIPAL MAI NTENAIICE
SUPPL IES
ACCOUNT
207.40 tot 64100 250
6?1.44 620 15000
c0t1P usA
OFF ICE EXPENSE
MI SC. SUPPLIES
OFF I CE EXPENSE
84.43
32.16
14.O4
101 61120 110
526 69020 120
621 64450 110
16217
16629
16687
17129
17495
18011
18565
18959
18979
19057
19083
19330
AMOUNT
621.44
700.00
1 ,345.78
422,18
25.00
39.37
1,066.00
6,916.50
187.19
118.58
325.44
22a.36
85017 VERtZor,r HIRELESS IESSAGING SERVI 18763
COI{I,IUN I CAT I OT S
OTTO MILLER
l,4l S cE L LA|,l Eot s
STANDARD REGISTER
OFF I CE EXPENSE
CENTRAL BUSI I.IESS EOUIPMENT
OFFICE EXPEIISE
STEVEII BAUI'I
COITRACTUAL SERVICES
JJR CONSTRUCTION
CAPITAL EOUIPI.{ENT
ANG IIEIJSPAPERS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
ARROIJI'EAD I4OUNTAIN SPR I NG L]ATER
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
CREATIVE INTERCONI{ECT
co. ult I cAT r or{s
700.00 731 22525
1,315.78 101 64250 110
122,18 621 64450 110
39.37 526 69020 160
1,066.00 101 68010 220 1372
6,916.50 526 59020 801
187.19 527 66520 120
148.68 326 80720 120
125.44 526 69020 120
228.36 101 65200 160
19827 357.05
?07.40
130.93
19768
85016 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
85020 ZEP }4AIIUFACTUR I NG COMPANY
MISC. SUPPLIES
25,00 327 79480 120
85024 DELTA SATETY SUPPLY CO
TRAIIIIXG EXPEiISE 357-05 527 66520 260
NUMBER NAME
CITY OF BURLINGAMET'ARRANT REGISTER
09/a6/02
VENDOR DETAI Lt*t Denotes Hand t"lr. i tten Checks
05353
ACCOUNT
228,658.44 526 69020 171
2,090.50 101 65150 220
233,517.47 731 22587
282.55 101 64350 120
84996 SAN FRANCISCO !'ATER DEPT
I",ATER PURCHASES
84997 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84998 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION &
MI SCELLANEOUS
84999 IilEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR-
MISC. SUPPLIES
85000 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
85001 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY
MISC. SUPPLIES
85002 ABAG . LIABILITY
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
85003 STEOUIPilENTCO.
CAPITAL EAUIPMENT
CAPITAL EAUIPMENT
85004 CHIEF BILL REILLY
OFFICE EXPENSE
Ii,IISC. SUPPLIES
BLDG. & GRCX,.INDS MAINT.
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAINING EXPENSE
85005 HECo INDUSTRIES, INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
85006 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS
85007 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
85008 VALLEY OIL CO.
SUPPL I ES
85009 JOSEPH t.IILLIAM MCCLAIN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
560.00
624.00
34,441 .54
17,220.77
129.85
369.15
28.88
25 .00
560.36
320 80231 220
326 80320 220
526 69020 800
527 66520 800
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
228,668.44
2, 090.50
233,517.47
282.55
1 , 1 84.00
372.62
2,500.00
51 ,662.31
913.24
144.38
114.00
2,803.50
?,506.90
05378
03451
03964
09270
09459
09518
10077
11558
1',t640
15250
15711
15764
372.52 529 58030 120 4200
2,500.00 618 64520 ?'t0
101 65200
101 65200
101 65200
101 65200
101 65200
110
120
190
250
260
144.38 527 66520 120
114.00 101 64420 121
2,803.50 101 68010 220 1787
2,506.90 620 15000
16066 42.00 101 68010 220 1787
42.00
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IEI,'ARRANT REGISTER
09 t06/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes lland gritten Checks
NUIIBER NAME
84981
81981
84986
84991
84991
44994 LAI'SON PROOUCTS, INC.
SUPPLIES
ACCOUNI
35,500.00 320 80232 220
119.61 526 69020 260
2,301.63 101 64560 151
135.79 101 68020 110 2200
124.49 101 66100 110
272.26 320 80580 1'10
2,171.40 101 64420 15O
42.63 101 68020 192 2200
137.?3 620 66700 110
412,39 101 66210 226
405.38 619 6/,460 210 5180
35,16 620 '15000
8198?G. BORTOLOTTo & CO., INC.
COi/TRACTUAL SERVICES
81983
SAUER COIT1PRESSORS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
BRENTo SAFETY, l C.
IRAINING EXPENSE
BURL I NGAI,4E CHAI.4BER OF COI.iI.4ERCE
cHAlrlEER Ot CoI4MERCE Pt4T.
CRAFT PRINTERS
OFFICE EXPENSE
EI.'I NG IRRIGATIO}I PRODUCTS
I,4I SCELLANEOUS
1,.1,. cRAI NGER. INC.
SMALL I@LS
K & L' DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S
84987
81990
8l.989 DUI.IN ADVERTISIIIG INC.
PUBLICATIONS & ADVER]ISING
CITY OF REDUO@ CI TY
co,fi,ruN I cAT loils
CITY HALL IIAINTENAI/CE
I.I I SCELLANEOJS
300.00
22,312.50
54.11
621 61150 160
621 61150 220
731 225&
01309
01358
01400
01637
01675
01442
0't 862
01992
02036
02157
02261
0?645
02755
PAGE I
Atrl0utiT
412.13
35,500.00
119.61
2,301.63
135.79
124.49
22,666.61
272,26
2,571 .40
82.63
137.23
L1) \a
35.16
03002 290.11 620 15000
290.11
405.38
84985 BURLIIIGAXE STATIONERS
OFfICE EXPEI,ISE
442.13 101 65200 203
84988 coRPoRATE ENVIRoNIENTS, Iftc.,
OFF I CE EXPENSE
02214
8l.992 GRANITE ROCK CO}IPANY
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE
84995 IIATIOIIUIDE I'IRE & BRUSH }IFG.
SUPPLIES
08-50- 2002
NAME
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
IilATER FUND
SE!'ER FUND
SOLID LJASTE FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF IIISURANCE FU}ID
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPilENT SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
STATE GRANTS FUND
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF BURLINGAME
I.'ARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP - 02-03
PAGE 9
FUND
101
320
326
526
527
528
5?9
618
619
620
621
731
734
896
AMOUNT
95
33
15
6
?11
18
2
7
3
249
3
9
$558
995.79
892.30
246.07
111.29
824.36
775.48
126.36
839.40
,478.12
400.71
889.39
35.67
514.39
112.70
314.21
a )n u.+t .+o) vo Cp- I*f 4zLers s *{ \lv
THIS IS TO
I NCLUSIVE,
THE AIiIOI,NT
OFF I C IALS,
ACCORDANCE
2.tt)4.1 2
HONORABLE I.IAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
AND/OR CLAII'IS NUMBERED FROI{ 84874 THROUGH 84980 INCTUSIVE,TOTALING IN
0F $658,478.12, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPRoVED By THE pRopER
AND IN T|Y OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
t.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOIJNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUEMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATECOUNCI L
CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.'ARRAIIT REGISTER
08/30/02
VENOOR OETAI L
'*r oenotes Hand tJritten Checks
PAGE 8
AHOUNT
300.00
561.50
'120.00
2,548.20
2,3/.0.00
300.00
742.06
500.00
289.23
$658,478. 12
NUUBER NAI.IE
a4972
81973
81971
84975
8197A
41979
84980
TOTAL
SOUTHER}I SAN I4ATEO COUNTY POLICE 23904
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
DEPART}IENT OT JUST ICE
MISCELLANECT',S
MIKE SPI LLANE
DEPOSIT REFU}.IDS
FAST RESPONSE ON SITE TESTING
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING CO
III SCELLAI{EOUS
THAI HUT RESTAURANT
DEPOSIT REFUI]DS
EOUISERV
EOUIPMEIIT }IAINT.
ACCOUNT
100.00 731 22520
564.50 734 65195 220
120.00 101 23620
2,518.20 734 65195 220
2,340.00 731 22520
300.00 731 ?2520
742,06 101 65200 400
300.00 731 22520
2a9.23 620 66700 200
23464
23905
23906
23907
23908
23909
?3911
81976 SILVERADO CONSTRUCTION
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
84977 CONT INENTAL PROPERTIES
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
23910
CITY OF BURLII'IGAMEUARRAIII REC I STER
0aBo/02
VENDOR DETAILr*' Denotes llEnd lrritten Checks
65300 110
66210 120
59020 110
69020 120
66700 110
101 58010 120 1101
101 68010 800 1101
PAGE 7
AMOUI]T
512.00
190.00
2,617.50
1,880.8,|
155.16
125.00
7 ,283.55
60.00
600.00
2,726.50
1,295-00
5 ,405 "21
20,009.20
NIJI,iEER IIAI4E
84959
84960
81961
84962
81965
81966
84968
84969
81970
THE MOBI LE STORAGE GROUP
BLDG, & GROUNDS I'IA I NT.
MAZE & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
PC MALL
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
CAPITAL EOUI PI.iENT
SCS TIELD SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
PACI F I C BELL/UORLDCOIii
IJTILITY EXPENSE
23128
23178
23301
23590
23695
23727
23728
924,80
72.68
137,69
542.95
102,69
ACCOUNT
512,00 101 65100 220
190.00 526 69020 190
2,617.50 101 64560 210
SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFF ICE EXPEIISE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
OTTICE EXPENSE
101
101
526
620
EOISE CASCADE OTFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OTTICE EXPETISE
84963 SCAPES, I C.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
23326
84964
155.16 101 66100 110
425.00 526 69020 ',120
106.59
7 ,176.96
REFRI GERAT ION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639
TRAVEL & I.IEETINGS
GE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS
PUI.|P EOUIPI,IENT REPAI R
60.00 619 64460 250
600.00 ,26 69020 230
2,726.50 526 69020 210
1,295.00 528 66600 210
5,405.21 896 2028'1
20,009.20 1o',t 64400 210
44967 APPLE OTIE E}.IPLOYI.{EIII SERVICES
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
DCE DES I Gll, Coi4MUN I Ty & ENVIRoNME 23784
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
84971 8AY AREA ECONO.IICS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 14,365.80 101 64400 210
14,365.80
23138
?3660
84958 PITNEY Bo!IES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
zau4
21741
a1917 ooRPoRATE EXPRESS OF THE gEST, I 21819
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
81918
CITY OF BURLI}IGAMEIIARRANT REGI STER
08t30t02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand l,lritten Checks
[ufl8ER ],tAitE
84942 NICOLAS BECHI.IATI
DEPOSIT REIUNDS
84913 GEORGE I.IH I TE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81911 LARRY I.IORSELLO
OEPOSI T REFUIIDS
81915 PORTOSAN
RENTS & LEASES
81916 SKYHA!'KS SPORTS ACADE}'IY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I'rslt INc.
}I I SC, SUPPLIES
84949 A& L JAXITORIAL SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84951
ACCOUNT
1,300.00 73't 22520
91.50 101 68010 220 1660
3,950.00 731 225?0
175.07 529 58030 180 /.200
1,603.20 101 68010 220 1372
231.00 101 64400 120
890.09 527 66520 120
260.00 619 64160 ?20 5170
126.00 619 61460 210 5160
431.66 527 66520 120
86.20 101 68010 't60 1101
1,463.51 ',101 65200 400
4,101 .57 527 66520 800
25,000.00 320 76010 120
21253
21197
21547
21656
218s6
21936
21917
22138
22144
22736
22895
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
1,300.00
94.50
3,950.00
175 .07
4,603.20
231 .00
890.09
260.00
125.00
35.69
131.66
86.20
1 ,463.51
4,101 .57
25,000.00
84950 PROVIDENCE PEST TERI.IITE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
22r93
84954 FIRE SERVICE SPECITICATION & SUP 22705
I.1 I SCELLANEOUS
44955
AT&T
coMtrlu I cAT toNs
8495?UNISOURCE I,4AI T.SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
84953 VERIZON IIIRELESS
co{ uir I cAT I 0N S
UNITED RENTALS
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
81956 I4ARSTEN S]REET PART}IERS
Il I SC. SUPPL I ES
84957 AMERICA}I TURF SERVICES
EOUI PiIENT I.{AINT.
22975
622.18 t29 68030 200
622.18
35.69 101 65'100 160
CI TY OF BURLINGAME
L]ARRANT REGISTER
0an0/02
VEI']DOR DEIAI Lr*r Denotes Hand l.,ritten Checks
101 67500 120
101 67500 1?5
't01 67s00 129
101 67500 160
PAGE 5
AI.4OUNT
175.42
1 ,559.00
2,500.00
3,755.00
I ,398.71
2,707 _20
104,04
3,314.48
5 ,978.52
8,506.30
15,775.18
199.14
NUTIBER IIAI.4E
44929
8/.930
84931
44932
84933
81931
BURTONIS FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS I,{AINT.
CANTERBURY INTERNATIONAL
tl l sc. suPPLtEs
EFREI4 CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
DEPOSIT REFU}IDS
19366
19721
20019
20060
20301
20339
20464
20706
20801
21063
ACCOUNT
175.1? 101 65200 203
1,559.00 1A1 66210 120
2,500.00 731 2?520
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
RENTS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
RENTS & LEASES
251.67
251,67
251 .66
101 66210'180
526 69020 180
527 66520 180
MICRO U/AREIIOUSE
I'I I SCELLANEOJS
84935 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC.
SUPPLIES
81936
84938
84939
84940
20900
Rot'tAN & LqJGEE, IllC.
PNOFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
DELL I{ARKETING L. P.
TII SCELLANEOUS
t,I I SCELLANEOUS
SAN MATEO CREDIT UI,I ION
iI I SC. SUPPLTES
L I BRARY..RECORDS AND CASSETT
LIBRARY..BOOKS AND I4APS
coii'tuN I cAT r oN s
AT&T ['IRELESS
cstitult I cAT I0I s
RACOUET SI,I I TN
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
1,398.71 101 65100 150
2,707.20 101 58010 220 1782
101.01 620 15000
3,311.48 101 65100 100
,,178.5?
500.00
320 80790 210
731 22s25
6
2
'10'1 66100 400
320 79102 400
15,775.48 326 79530 210
46
84
0
75
33
212.88
63.61
209.18
81911 OUICK I.IIX CONCRETE
iI I SC. SUPPLIES
S IOEIIALK REPATR EXPENSE
21140
101 66210 120
101 66210 219
1 ,301 .07
84937 CATNENI NE J.X. NIL}IEYER
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
MI SCELLANEOUS
20963
815 .84
485,23
CITY OF BURLINGAME
I.'ARRANT REGISTER
08t30/02
VEIIDOR DETAILr*' Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
PAGE 4
NUI,IEER NAI.IE
84915
84919
81920
84921
84922
81921
81921
84925
84926
81927
10'l 64200
619 64160
621 61450
AMOUNT
862.16
163.11
423.58
346,40
661 .52
3,080.00
891 .82
120.00
255.52
225.00
189.81
779 .12
52.50
ACCOUNT
BRIN(IS INC.
BANKING SERVI CE TEES
OFFICE EXPENSE
cofiP usA
OFFICE EXPEIISE
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
OFFICE EXPE}ISE
135.75
126.11
101 64250 120
529 68030 110 4200
15813
16687
17142
'17102
17497
17872
187?9
18733
18851
18939
18990
19095
110
120
110
84917 Jr'r CHEHICAL Co}TPANY
OFFICE EXPENSE
84918 ilETRo
',t08t
LE CoflfiUNICATIONS
Collllull I CAT I Olt S
423.5A 101 68010 110 1101
316.10 10't 65300 160
661.52 526 69020 120
3,080.00 101 68010 220 1762
891.82 101 68020 130 2300
120.00 101 68010 220 1660
COLORPRIIIT DIGITAL
l'llsC. SUPPLIES
SPRING OOIT}I EOUESTRIAN
CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
SIERRA I.IOREIIO
'4ENCA}ITI
LE CO.
SMALL T@LS
LII,IDA LENORE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
BAI LEY I S
SI.IALL TOOLS
TRAI N I NG EXPENSE
BAY ALARI.I
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
UNITROL
SUPPLIES
ACCESS UNI IORiIS & EMEROIOERY
I'{ISCELLANEOUS
LIEBER] CASSIDY IIH I TI'IORE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
116.31
139.21
0
0
1 68020 130 2300
1 68020 260 2300
189,81 620 15000
52.50 101 64350 210
84924 PRIORITY 1
SI,IALL TOOLS
19239 109.97 101 56210 '130
109.97
84915
124.47
17 .31
21.63
225.00 619 61160 220 5180
779.42 731 22533
18357
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEL'ARRANT REGISTER
08/30/02
VENDOR DETAI L,*r oenotes Hahd tlritten Checks
}IUMBER NAME
84903 ABAG . L IABI LI TY
CLAI}IS PAYMEIITS
8/+904 OLE IS
SUPPLIES
84905 SARXER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS
MI SCELLANEOUS
a1907 3 T EAUIPT.TENT C0.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
81908
84909 PIP PRINTING
I.iISCELLAIIEOUS
84910 ROfiEO PACKING CO
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
84911 TIIE ADAI.I-HILL CO4PANY
FIRE APPARATUS I'IAINT.
84912 UECo INDUSTR I ES, INC.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
44913
ACCOTJNT
7,839.40 618 64520 601
171.67 620 15000
PAGE 5
09518
09626
09670
09990
10077
10557
11318
11571
11610
Al,i0u T
7,a39.40
171.67
1 ,872.75
553.83
316,52
536,44
974,25
6A.11
1 ,258.36
28.25
201
346
106
25
575
61
't66
47
128
210
74
?8
99
93
00
53
20
4a
51
09
CAL-STEAM
MI SCELLAI{EOUS
TRAFFI C CONTROL MATERIALS
t.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
3.13
43.7A
97.27
391 .96
101 68020 192 2200
10't 66210 222
526 69020 1?0
527 66520 120
553.83 101 64100 115
316.12 527 66520 120
972.30 101 61100 115
974.25 101 68020 120 2200
68.1/, 101 65200 203
1,258.36 527 66520 12O
28.25 101 680'10 120 1114
SAN I.IATEO LOCK I.'ORKS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
44914 SPECIALIZED COI.IMUN I CAT I ON S
I.I I SCELLA}IEOUS
15787
3,827.10 731 22561
3,827.50
84905 ORCIIARD SUPPLY HAROUARE
MtSC. SUPPLIES
st'IALL Tmts
BLDG. & GROUNOS }IAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAI NT.
TRAINING EXPENSE
MISC. SUPPLIES
S}IALL TOOLS
S}IALL T@LS
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
I.IISC, SUPPLIES
101 66210 120
101 66210 130
'101 68020'r90 2200
101 65200 203
101 68020 260 2100
526 69020 ',120
526 69020 130
5?7 66520 130
529 68030 192 1200
619 64460 120
972.3010620
14613
09072
8l,897 TARGET SPECIALTY PROOUCIS, INC.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
09112
84898
l4At'/ P0!,ER
TEI'IPORARY EI'IPLOYI4ENT SVC.
PACI FIC EELL
CO.II.{UN I CAT I ON S
PUI.IP REPAIR SERVICE CO.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
R&SERECTIONOF
TI I SC. SUPPLIES
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
PERSO}IIIEL EXAMI NATIONS
!,EST GROUP PAYMEI.IT CTR.
PROTESSIONAL & SPEC1AL IzED S
B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
I.I I SC, SUPPLIES
I.IUFF I E CALBREAII{
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
CI IY OT BURLINGAiIEL'ARRANT REGISTER
08/30t02
VENDOR DETAILt*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
NUI,4BER NAITIE
84889
84890
8489't
44492
8/.893
81891
84895
84896
a4a99 TESTIilG EircIEERSr IilC.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
84900
ACCOUNT
614.40 101 55300 011
3.00 101 67500 160
1,162.61 519 61160 210 5110
150.00 619 U116O 12o 5110
233,517.47
2,000.00 10'l 61120 121
1.24 619 64460 120 5170
526.05 101 68010 120 1787
1,600,00 101 68010 220 1891
'1,170.00 320 80231 220
1,701.00 101 65100 29'1
SAN i4ATEO COIjI.ITY CONVENTION &
OFFICE EXPEIISE
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
OFF I CE EXPENSE
I,I I SCELLANEOUS
44.43
32.46
14.04
101 61420
526 69020
621 61150
731 22187
110
120
110
02819
03080
03197
03231
03131
03183
03964
09125
09270
09133
09139
PAGE 2
A14OUNT
614 .40
1,162,61
150.00
233,648.40
2,000.00
307 .19
1.24
526.05
1,600.00
1,170.00
'l ,701 .00
68.2484901
SAN TIATEO COIJNTY SHERIFFIS OTC.
PRISONER EXPENSE
STERICYCLE, INC.
SUPPLIES
84902 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
09459
908.76
n1.19
101 68020 120 2200
529 68030 120 1?00
1 ,682.95
3.00
307.19 101 64350 210
68.24 101 65?00 112
CI TY OF BIJRLINGAII1E1,'ARRANT REGISTER
08t30/02
VEI,IDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
10,000.00
443.00
218.51
4,373.39
8,00
330.00
193,203.00
145.83
3,909.00
499.25
239 .31
16,951 .07
827 .98
NUMBER NAI.IE
81871
84875
84878
84879
84880
84881
81882
8/.883
84884
84885
84886
81887
ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
AI4TECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
LEAGUE OF CAL I TORN TA CITIES
PUBLICATIOXS & ADVERTISINC
DULIN ADVERT I SI NG INC.
PUBLICATIO}IS & ADVERTISTNG
US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
E!'ING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
}I I SCELLAIIEOI,S
IEDERAL EXPRESS
OFFICE EXPENSE
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
UATER/FI i,IANCE PEI]Y CASH
I.I I SCETLANEOUS
[,.!,. GRAINGER, INC,
MISC. SUPPLIES
HARDING ESE, IIIC,
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
K & !i DISCOUNT LIGHTII.IG & SUPP
IIISC. SUPPLIES
}IISC. SUPPLIES
01078
01250
01745
02036
02110
02150
02184
0224A
02261
0?365
02645
ACCOUNI
'10,000.00 527 66520 ?20
244,51 101 55210 130
723
649
101 58010 114 ',t101
101 58010 120 1123
2
1
69
70
GRANI]E ROCK CO}IPANY
SIDELIALK REPAIR EXPEIISE
STREE] RESURFACINC EXPENSE
120.27
119.07
8.00 101 61120 150
330.00 101 64420 150
193,203.00 527 66530 220
1/t5.83 101 68020 192 2200
58.89
15.53
101 64420 110
101 64400 120
85.52
712.16
101 66?40 120
619 61160 120 5120
81888 LADSoX PRoDUCTS, INC.
SUPPLIES
02755 3't .95
81876 I,HITE CAP
SI4ALL TOOLS
818V CITY OF BURLIIIGAI4E
I.{ISCELLANEOUS
I.i I SC. SUPPLIES
01030
443.00 619 64460 220 5110
01624
0?157
71.12
3,909- 00 a96 2A2a?
499.?5 101 68020 '120 2200
101 66210 219
101 66210 226
16,951.07 528 66600 210
31.95 620 15000
08-23-2002
CITY OF BURLI}IGAMEI,IARRANT REGISTER
FUIID RECAP - 02-03
PAGE 10
AI.IOUNT
78,053,51
1,118.9A
56,666.01
2,000.00
s417,439.78
NAI.iE FUND
6EI,IERAL TUND
CAPITAL II.IPROVEI.IENTS FUND
L/ATER CAPI TAL PROJECT fUND
SEL/ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUI/D
!,ATER FUIID
SEL/ER FUNO
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF I}ISURA}ICE FUND
TACI LITIES SERVI CES TUND
EOUIPI,4ENT SERVI CES FUND
IiIFORMATIOII SERVI CES FUND
IRUST A},IO AGE}ICY FUIID
STATE GRA}ITS FU}ID
UTILITY REVOLVIXG FUND
OEBT SERVICE FUND
'101
320
326
327
526
5?7
529
618
619
6?0
621
731
734
896
930
10,277.77
26,909.42
5,500.00
114.44
3,417.25
3,962.09
11 ,194.57
8,212.00
632.58
177,7O9.44
1 ,337 .62
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HOIIORABLE MAYOR A O CITY COJNCIL:
THIS IS TO
II.ICLUSIVE,
THE AMOUIIT
0tt I clALs,
ACCORDANCE
CERTITY THAT THE CtAII,4S LISTED OII PAGES I.IUMSERED FROI.| 1 THROUGH IO
AIIO/OR CLAIT'IS NUI.4BEREO TRO'.I 84r/9 THROUGH 84873 INCLUSIVE,TOTALIIIG I}I
OT s417,439,78, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIT AND APPROVED 8Y IHE PROPER
AI{D IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IIi
L/ITII TIIEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEO,
F I IIANCE OIREC]OR
APPROVED FOR PAYI,IE}IT
COUNC I L
DATE
DATE
08-23-2002
CITY OF BURLINGAMELJARRANT REGISTER
FUND RENAP - 01-02
PAGE 9
NAME FUND AMOUNT
0 0. 00
$0.00TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSM, AND,/oR CLAIMS NUMBERED FRoM 84779 THROUGH 84815 INCLUSIVE,ToTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $O.OO, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY I}I
ACCORDANCE I.'ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMI TTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
COUNC I L DATE
08- 23-2002
CI]Y OF BURL I NGAI,IEI.IARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . O2.O3
NAME
PA6E 8
AIIOUNT
GENERAL FUND
CAPI TAL I T.IPROVEMENTS FUND
!/ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FIJI,ID
SEI,JER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
!/ATER FUIID
SEL/ER FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
SELF II,ISURANCE FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUI PI,{ENT SERVI CES FUND
IIIFORIIATION SERVICES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUNO
STATE GRANTS FUIID
UTILITY REVOLVI NG FUIID
DEBT SERVICE FUND
FUND
101
320
326
327
526
527
529
618
619
620
621
731
734
896
930
40 ,277 ,n
25,909.42
5,500.00
11a,41
3,117,25
3 ,962.09
11,194.57
I,2t+2.00
632.6A
177,709.14
1 ,337.62
78,053.51
1 ,118.98
s6,666.01
2,000.00
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HOIIORABLE MAYOR ATD CITY COU CIL:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEO,
9417 ,439 .78
T'II S IS TO
I I]CLUSIVE,
THE AMOUNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDANCE
CERTIFY TIIAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FRoI'1 1 THRoUGH 8
A},Io./OR CLAII.IS NU'.IBEiED FROiI 84779 TTIROI',GH 84873 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
OF 5417,439.78, HAVE BEEN CHECKEO IN OETAIT AIID APPROVED iY THE PROPER
AND IN i4Y OPINION REPRESENT FAIR ANO JUST CHARGES AGAIIIST THE CITY INgITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.4OUNTS AS INDICATED THEREOI'I.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI4ENT
DATE
COIJNC I L DATE
CITY OF BURLINGATIE!,ARRANT REGISTER
08/23/02
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
88.74
2,000.00
36.00
1,320.00
137.16
175.00
440.00
266.00
2,310.91
$117,439.78
NUMBER NAI,IE
44864
84866
447
84868
81870
84871
81872 DEI'EY SERVICES, INC.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
84873
TOTAL
MERRI TT SI.IITH COI,ISULTING
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S
DETAI L ACCOUNI
44.74 101 65200 110
813.20 101 64200 110
2,000.00 930 52150
36.00 101 64120 210
1,320.00 731 22516
137.16 731 22543
17s.00 101 64200 240
440.00 '10'1 68010 220 1660
266.00 527 66520 120
2,310.91 526 69020 210
VENDORr*r Denotes Hand trritten Checks
BOISE CASCADE OTFICE PROOUCTS CO 23306
OFF I CE EXPENSE
EANK OF NEU YORK
I,4I SCELLANEOUS
COUNTY SCH@L SERVICE FU D
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
EK CONSTRUCTION
iII SCELLANEOUS
84A69 DIANE G I OVAI.ITI I I.I I
MI SCELLANEOUS
23410
23553
23a7a
23897
23899
23900
23901
23902
23903
CAPIO
DUES & SUESCRIPIIONS
CHERI NICIIOL
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
813.2084865 OATASAFE
OFF I CE EXPE},ISE
CI TY OF BURLII,IGAI,iE!/ARRANT REG I STER
0a/?3/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r oenotes Hand Llritten Checks
PAGE 6
AIIIOUNT
3,300.00
174.38
400.93
200.00
63.54
595.00
4,242.00
698,35
748.50
342.35
133.00
36.a9
350.00
440.00
ACC0UIIT
3,300.00 101 68010 220 1661
174.38 101 68020 160 2300
400.93 711 22543
200.00 101 6a010 220 1661
63.51 101 641?0 26?
NICK'S DELI AND FINE FOODS
TRAIN!NG EXPE},ISE
JENKI NS/ATHENS INS
I,I ISCELLAIIEOUS
I'IARTY SPRINGER
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
81857 ALYSON ZUPPERO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22721
84853 SAN ITATEO REGIONAL NET!'ORK, tNC. 22759
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
UTILITY EXPENSE
44454
NUT1BER NAtlE
81818
81819
84850
84851
84852
8485E CPS
84859
81860
84861
84462
LEON CATHCHATOORIAII
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
VERIZOII ['IRELESS
COMMUN I CAT IONS
MIKE GIUST I
t,I I SCELLANEOUS
ROBERTA TAVAKE
COI.ITRACTUAL SERVICES
22521
22593
22609
22672
2?916
22917
23005
23063
230A5
23115
23195
22851
84855 FIRST AUTq.iOI!VE D ISTR I BUTORS
GAS, OIL & GREASE
22857
84856
101 65200 220
896 20281
8,212,00 618 64520 231
698.35 101 65200 201
900.00 101 68010 220 1650
748.50 101 68010 220 1661
342.35 101 61120 121
433.00 101 65200 110
36.89 101 68010 120 1423
350.00 101 64200 250
440.00 't01 68010 220 1661
75.00
520-00
PERSONIIEI EXAI'{I NATIONS
PRC, PUBL I C SECTOR
OFFI CE EXPENSE
S&S LORLDIJIDE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
3CI'IA i.IEi.IBERSHIP
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
NAD INE RONSON
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44463 DIRECTV
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
23253 48.98 526 69020 120
48.98
900.00
NUMBER NAME
84833
84831
84855
84836
81837
84841
44443
81814
81815
101 66240 260
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
525.61
'120.00
152.58
22.78
16,532.30
1,425.00
275 .00
440.00
25.72
10,898.71
2,375,00
2,100.00
CITY OF BURL I NGAME
Ul ARRANT REGISTER
08/23/02
VEIIDOR OETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
21543
84838 VEIZADES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
84839
OUICK I.IIX CONCRETE
XISC. SUPPLIES
REDLIOOD GENERAL TIRE
SUPPLIES
I.IARCI STRANGE
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
cDtJ GOVERN ENT, INC.
cor,4r,{uN I cAT I 0},r s
VB GOLF LLC
I,4ISCELLANEOUS
RECREAT IOII PROGRAM EXPEIISE
JCC , tNC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
ROBERTS AND BRUNE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
1,364,26 620 15000
120.00 101 68010 220 1660
152.58 320 80120 150
22.78 't01 65200 203
16,532.30 320 79411 210
U}IIVERSAL TLEEI SUPPLY I}iC.
FIRE APPARATUS I4AINT.
DU.ALL SAIETY
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
TRAINI}IG EXPEIISE
TRAINING EXPEI'ISE
84840 FILTERFRESII COFTEE EXCELLENCE
BIDG. & GRdJNDS I{AINT.
MONICA EHLERS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84442 FASTENALCOI'IPANY
FIRE APPARAIUS MAINT.
275.00 621 61150 190
440.00 101 68010 220 1661
25.72 ',101 65200 203
8,817.21
2,081.50
529 36717
529 68030 213
2,375.00 527 66520 210
358.83 526 69020 120
2,100.00 101 68010 220 1785
22178
84846 IIORTI{ AI.IERICAN SPORTS I.IANAGEiIENT 22382
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
21140
21421
211A2
21613
21623
21627
2174A
21948
22157
570.00
427.50
427 .50
84847 I'{IKE BLONDINO
III SCELLANEOUS
22384
108.24 731 ??545
108.24
525.61 101 66210 120
21216
358.83
21576
NUI,IBER NAME
84819
84820
84821
44822
81.823
44424
84825
84826
84827
81a2A
81829
81830
84831
101 66210 260
326 75170 210
526 69020 260
527 66520 260
PAGE 4
AMOU}IT
150.18
178.92
5rJ.10
2,222.56
495.00
396.00
1 ,669 ,97
498.67
1 ,026.86
5,708.00
32.4a
671.0A
1 ,073.25
CITY OF BURLIIIGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGISTER
08/23/02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes lland Uritten Checks
ANG NEL'SPAPERS
PUBTICATIONS & ADVERTISING
MISC. SUPPLIES
60.48
114-44
101 64200 150
r?7 80681 120
ZEP I.IAIIUFACTUR I NG COMPANY
I.,I I SC. SUPPLIES
I,IINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
EOUIPI.{EI,IT IIAINT.
POI.IER I,IASHITIG SERVI CE
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
CIUCCI CONSULT I }iG GROUP INC
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
MONICA OLSE},I
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
PEIIINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GE CAPITAL
OFF I CE EXPENSE
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
AFF Ill! TEL Col,ll.,UN I CAT I Oll S
COMMUII I CAT IONS
EAYSIDE BUI LDIIIG I'IATERIALS INC.
MISC. SUPPLIES
UICRO I,/AREHOUSE
I.' I SCELLANEOUS
LAI.IRENCE S. MOY
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
19057
19083
19561
19791
19832
20060
20216
20246
20501
20650
20706
2A954
ACCOUNT
573.10 101 65200 200
2,222,56 101 66210 210
495.00 101 65300 220
396.00 101 68010 220 1661
1,669.97 320 80510 220
99 -73
398.94
101 68020 110 2100
101 68010 220 1101
1,026.86 621 64450 160
LYNX TECHNOLOGIES
TRAINING EXPENSE
PROTESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZEO S
TRAIi/ING EXPENSE
TRAINING EXPENSE
69,34
5,500.00
69.33
69.33
32.48 101 68020 120 2200
1,073.25 101 68010 220 1762
84832 RENEE RAI.|SEY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
21136 400.00 101 68010 220 1331
400.00
150.18 527 66520 120
19131
674.0a 527 66530 100
CIIY OF BURLINGAMEI.iARRANT REGISTER
0a/23 /02
VENDOR DETAI Lt*r Denotes Hand l,rritten Checks
PAGE 3
At40uIT
2,653.25
53.55
441.17
217 .50
75,27a.6A
403.86
102.30
776.85
571-20
'175 ,865 .00
191.20
1,545.t0
5 75.00
306,40
680.00
NUI.4BER NAME
84803
41801
84805
84806
84807
84808
84809
84810
84811
84814
PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
BRINKIS INC.
OFFICE EXPEIISE
CAROL PRATER
MI SCE!LANEOUS
COMMUNITY GATEPATH
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
LINIIART PETERSEN POLJERS ASSOC.
I.{ I SCELLANEOUS
I'IETRO I{O8ILE COMMUI.J I CAT IONS
RADIO I.IAINT,
COLORPRINT D I GITAL
}I I SC. SUPPL I ES
LEE & ASSOCIATES
MI SCETLA}IEOUS
ROEYN MCNAI.4ARA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
OOUG'S I'IOTORCYCLE SERVICE
SUPPLIES
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84817 PEGGY GUARALDI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18855
84815 SIATE OF CA OFFICE OF ETIERGE}ICY 18857
TRAI N I NG EXPEIISE
ACCOUNT
2,653.25 101 68010 220 1787
53.55 529 68030 ,1,10 4200
111.17 731 22543
247.50 101 66210 210
75,27A.6a B1 22515
403.86 101 65200 205
102.30 101 65500 120
776.85 101 65200 100
571.20 101 68010 220 1661
175,865.00 620 66700 800
'191.20 620 15000
1,515.50 320 80600 220
57t.00 101 65500 260
306.10 101 611?0 121
680.00 10'1 68010 220 ,t661
84812 PIERCE iIANUFACTURING, IIiC.
CAP!TAL EOUIP}iENT
84811
15711
15813
16447
16575
16599
17402
17197
1756A
17588
18013
18337
'19025
19044
84818 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
MISC. SUPPLIES
19047 279.79 320 80231 120
279.79
848'16 PREFERRED ALLIANCE
PERSONNEL EXAI,4INATIONS
CITY OF BURLINGAMEL/ARRANT REGISTER
08t23/02
VENDOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand L/ritten Checks
PAGE 2
NUIIBER NAME
81789
a479a
84794
84795
84797
81798
84799
84800
84801
HORIZON
MI SC. SUPPLIES
BERNARD EDL/ARDS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TAB PRODUCTS CO.
OIT I CE EXPE}ISE
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
POLICE..STJPPLIES
I,4I SCELLANEOUS
DANKA OFF I CE IUAGI}IG CO
CITY HALL MAINTE}IANCE
NORTH VALLEY OIL
EAUI PI.IEiIT MA I IIT.
DEI,JEY PEST COI'ITROL
GAS, OIL & GREASE
iIARK CERIY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
212.31 529 68030 '120 1200
42.22 101 66210 120
3,677.35 101 66100 210
1,120.00 101 68010 220 1762
83.90 101 64200 110
225.00 10',t 65200 220
528.40
1 ,414.98
101 65100 126
734 65195 400
35,76 621 64450 200
86.00 101 68020 200 2200
100.00 101 66210 201
210.00 101 6a010 220 1762
2,566.16
952.00
95.00
888.00
67 .33
101 58010
10'1 68010
10't 68020
101 68020
731 2253t
Atrl0u T
1 ,568.49
212.31
12.22
3,677 .35
1,120.00
83.90
225.00
260.2a
1 ,917 .38
35 .76
86.00
100-00
210.00
ACCOUNT
BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
r.r I sc. suPP!lEs
CONTRACTUAL SERV!CES
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
MI SCELLANEOUS
120
220
250
260
03910
09130
09548
09677
10620
'11532
13758
138',I5
'11,338
1891
1644
2200
2200
09213
81792 oCE'-BRUIrNG, r C,
PROTESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
09193
44793
TELECOi,IiIUN I CAT I ONS ENGINEERIIiG A 'IO1O1
COIITRACTUAL SERV!CES
81796 PIP PRINTING
OTTICE EXPENSE
84802 SAN I.4ATEO LOCK I.IORKS
Il I SC. SUPPLIES
14643 85.52 101 68010 120 17E5
260.28 101 51?00 110
84791 RO OFT I CE SOLUTIONS
MI SC. SUPPLIES
14405
CIlY OF BURLIN6AMEI.JARRA},IT REGISTER
08t23/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand !/ritten Checks
80.00 10't 32100
ACCOUNI
101 66210 120
101 66210 222
526 690?0 120
526 69020 130
619 64460 1?0 5170
320 80120 220
320 80420 800
101 65300 130
101 65200 203
PAGE 1
AMOUIIT
2,225 .08
181.31
80.00
949.00
6,729.28
1 ,291 .O5
52-76
288-98
56,1a5.41
117.12
NUI.4BER NA}IE
44788
GRAY I S PAINT, BURLINGAME
MISC. SUPPLIES
IRAT FI C CONTROL I.4ATERIALS
MISC. SUPPLIES
SI.IALL TOOLS
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
84780
84781
a47a2
81783
81784
44745
u786 LA!/SoN PRoDUCTS, INC,
SUPPLIES
81787
ERENTON SAFETY, INC.
TRAI N ItIG EXPENSE
TRAI N ING EXPENSE
CITY OF BURLINGAI4E
I.I I SCELTANEOUS
BURLINGAI.4E RECREAT ION DEPT.
RECREATIOII EXPENSES
CIIY OF REDI./OOO CI TY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CAPI TAL EOUIPMENT
L. I. CURTIS & SoNS
SiIALL TOOLS
FIRE APPARATUS I.,IA I NT.
K & U DISCOUI'IT LIGIITING & SUPP
MISC. SUPPLIES
61.70
119.61
101 68020 260 2200
526 69020 260
01025
01400
01551
01663
01862
02027
02615
02755
03587
,067 .32
112.99
?5.92
56.17
63?.68
949.00 101 10700
3
2
900
829
086
205
00
28
02
03
P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
UTI LITY EXPENSE
s[AP 0N T00LS
FIRE APPARATUS }.IAI NT.
39 "1056,146.01
101 66210 170
896 20280
52.76 101 66240 120
117.42 101 65200 203
u779
03051
288.98 620 15000
08.16-2002
NAII1E
THI S IS IO
INCLUS IVE,
TIIE AMOUI,IT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDAiICE
RESPECTFULLY SUBI.IITTED,
CITY OF BURLIIIGAMEL'ARRA}iT REGISTER
IUND RECAP - 02-03
PAGE 1f,
A OUIT
GEI{ERAL FUND
CAPI TAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
L/ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUNO
L/ATER FUI'ID
SE!/ER FUND
SOLIO I.IASTE FUNO
GOLF CE}ITER FUND
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPME}IT SERVI CES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND
TRUST A}ID AGEIICY TUNO
STATE GRAIITS FUIID
BURLINGAiIE TRAIII SIIUTTLE PROGRAM
UTILTTY REVOLVIiIG FUND
FUI.ID
'101
320
326
526
527
528
529
619
620
621
625
731
734
736
896
0,00
131 ,773.32
1 ,118,881 .70
3,A59.12
3,356.7',1
18,885.02
732,31
748.24
255.12
3,892.09
3,681.51
14.61
12,789.01
2,653,66
18,123.67
3,571,66
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HOTIORAELE I'IAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
$1 ,323,217 .75
{*s.ea)
\too. n>)(to.Ec)
ck t(c?{oK ?'l-tcqa-E- C*ett
wtD
UOtD
VdtD
JJ r9>+.G3
CERTIFY THAT TIIE CLAII.4S LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBERED FROtI I THRfl.,GH 13
AND/OR CLAII{S NUMBEREO FROIiI 84642 TIIRCI,,GH 8428 INCLUSIVE,IoIALING IIJ
OT $1,323,217.75, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN OETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AND IN I.IY OPII.JION REPRESEiIT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY III
!/ITH TIIEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI,4ENT
DATE
COIJNC I L DAIE
08- 16- 2002
NAI,iE
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE I.IAYOR AND CITY COJNCIL:
CITY OF BURLINGAI,4Et,,IARRANT RE6ISTER
FUND RECAP - 01-02
FUND
PAGE 12
A}ICIJNT
2,686.11
36,008.51
21 ,579 .25
305.71
1 ,931 ,91
.32
63. 12
s62,660.96
GEIIERAL FUIJD
CAPITAL II.IPROVEMENTS FUND
IJATER CAPITAL PROJECT TUND
UATER FUND
SEgER FU}IO
FACI LI TIES SERVICES TUNO
EOUIPI4ENI SERVICES TUND
101
320
526
527
619
620
THIS IS TO
I}iCLUSIVE,
THE A}IOU}IT
OFF I CIALS,
ACCORDA}ICE
RESPECTFULLY SUBI.IITTED,
CERTIFY THAT THE CLAII4S LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROI.I'I THRCI,GI'I 12
AND/oR CLAIUS NUIIBEREo FRoM 84642 THRCTJGB 84r/8 I CLUSM,TOTALING IN
OT 562,660.96, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN OEIAIL ANO APPROVED BY THE PROPER
AND tN I.IY OPINION REPRESENT IAIR AND JUST CHARGES A6AIIIST THE CITY III
I.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI4OUNTS AS INDICATED IHEREON.
FINANCE OIRECTOR
APPROVED TOR PAYi{ENT
COUiICI L
OATE
DATE
0a- 16- 2002 PAGE 11
AI,iOUNT
3,955.21
3,681 .51
14.61
12,749.01
2,653.66
18,123.57
3,571.66
$1,385,878.71
IIAME FUIID
101
320
326
526
527
528
529
619
620
621
625
731
734
896
GEIlERAL FUND
CAPITAL Ii.IPROVEI{ENTS FUI'ID
gATER CAPIIAL PROJECT FUND
S'ATER FUND
SEIiER fUNO
SOLID IIASTE FUNO
GOLF CENTER FUND
TACILIIIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMEIIT SERVICES FUND
I}IIORMATIOII SERVICES FUIIO
FIRE MECIIANIC SERVI CES FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND
STATE GRAIITS FUND
BURL I NGAI,IE TRAIIJ SHUTTLE PROGRAI4
UTILITY REVOLVING FUIIO
0.00
134,459.46
1 , 151 ,89O ,21
25,138.37
3,662.42
20,816.93
732.31
74a.21
341.11
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORABLE I.,IAYOR AI,IO CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS IVE,
TNE AI,4OUNT
OFF I CIAIS,
ACCORDANCE
CERTIFY IIIAT TIIE CLAIIIS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROI.I'I THROJGH 1'I
AND/oR CLATMS NUI'|BERED ERoM 84642 THROUGT{ 8478 TNCLUSM,TOTALTNG IN
OF 3'1,385,878.71, HAVE BEEN CIiECKED III DETAIL AND APPROVEd 8Y THE PROPER
AIID IN I,IY OPI}IIOII REPRESEiIT TAIR AND JUST CI{AR6ES AGAII.{ST IHE CITY IN
[JITH THEIR RESPECTIVE A}IO,JIITS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYXENT
COI.JNC I L DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
IUND RECAP . O2.O3
DATE
NUMBER NAME
84769
TOTAL
SJ}I CONSTRUCTION
MI SCELLANEOUS
ACC0UIr
i00.00 v1 22525
100.00 101 64420 121
720.13 101 65200 250
300.00 731 ?2520
'1,000.00 731 22520
'1,952.00 731 22520
1,102.00 520 80580 220
21,579.25 326 79530 220
3,532.50 101 66,100 260
167.01 731 22516
PAGE '10
At40ut'lT
500.00
100.00
7?0.13
300.00
1,000.00
1,952.00
'1 , 102,00
21 ,579.25
3,532.50
167.01
$1,385,878,71
CITY OF EURLINGAI.IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER
08/ 16/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritteh Checks
?r888
84770 ALTA LAiIGUAGE SERVICES, INC.
PERSONIIEL EXAMINATIONS
23889
84771
STEVEN GENSLER
MI SCELLANEOUS
ROCOUE YBALLA
TRAVEL & I{EETINGS
23890
8477?DAVID PRESS
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
23891
84773 t,I. SUI.IGARNER INC.
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
23892
84774 MAXIUUI SERVTCE LANDSCAPTNG, tNC 23893
DEPOSIT NEFUNDS
u775 BALLAROO ACCI.JSTICS
CONTRACIUAL SERVICES
23891
84776 gESI VALLEY COI,ISTRUCIIOII
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23895 AP
817-/7 AscE CONTINUING EDUCATIoN
TRAINING EXPE}ISE
23896
un8 23898
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEI./ARRANT REGISTER
08/ 16/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes lland l,rritten Checks
3,859.12
1,010.00
326 80320 210
526 69020 210
PAGE 9
AI.iOI.JNT
1 ,764.59
35.00
1 ,573.15
45.21
719.79
4,899.12
500.00
77 ,988.10
121.34
u,645.00
9,105 .oO
2,738,66
700.00
84758
84759 ERLER AND KALINOIJSKI,INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALTZED S
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
PROFESSIONAL COI.I UNTCATION INSTA 23485
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
NUI.IBER NAI.IE
44754
817s5
44761
84762
41763
84761
81765
23411
44756 CANOI.I FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
CITY HALL }IAIiITENANCE
23136
84757
SAN FRANCI SCO EXAMINER
OFF I CE EXPENSE
RECALL - TOTAL INFORMATION MGI.IT
iII SCELLANEOJS
CRESCO EOUIPI{E T REIITALS
STREET RESURFACING EXPE},ISE
CITY NATIOIIAL BANK
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
KELLY iIOORE
TRAFFIC CONTROL I.IATERIALS
CAI.IBRIDGE CM INC.
PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S
TRINET CONSTRUCTION
CON]RACTUAL SERVICES
I.IECHANICS BAIiK
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
ACCOUNT
1,764.59 736 61570 110
35.00 731 22518
1,573.15 621 64450 200
15,24 101 66210 225
719.79 101 65100 800
23366
23470
23531
236?1
23758
23779
23840
23a47
23860
23873
23885
200.00
500.00
101 36600
731 22525
500.00 731 22525
77,988.10 320 76010 220
124.31 101 &210 222
20,101,90 320 75110 Z1O
81,645.0O 320 80510 220
9,405.00 320 80510 220
2,738.66 101 66100 120
a476a DANIEL A}ID LAURA BERTERRETCIiE
l{lscELLA EOlrS
23887
500.00 731 22525
500.00
20,401 .90
&760 CHARLES SCHEI.IBRI
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
81766 DLT SOLUTION, INC
UI SC. SUPPLIES
84767 TEVIN AND LAUREN OISULLIVAI,I
tII SCELLAIIEOUS
I.,II SCE!LANEOUS
CI TY OF BURLII,IGAME!JARRANT REGISTER
08/ 16/02
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
2,000.00
3,000.00
712.85
2,630.00
16,359.08
529.00
1,000.00
110.11
96.00
1 ,065 .33
11,181 .11
825.00
257.40
255.00
952,60
NUMBER NAME VENDOR.*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks
84738 TECIINOLOGY,ENGTNEERIIIG & CONSTRU 22435
CAPITAL EAUIPMENT
44739 DKS ASSoCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
DETAI L ACCOUI,IT
2,000.00 101 55100 800
3,000.00 320 79100 210
84741
u742
84743
84711
81715 22924
81746 !/ESTERN EXTERI.{ I I,IATOR COI,IPANY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84747
2,530.00 101 65100 140
16,359.08 736 64571 220
529,00 101 64420 121
1,000.00 711 22520
't10.11 101 65100,110
96.00 10'1 68010 220 1111
'l ,065.33 527 65520 120
14,141 .11 320 76010 210
825.00 731 22525
257.10 101 68010 220 1372
255.00 10't 68010 220 1644
952.60 101 65300 110
LEADERSH IP
UNIFORI,4S AND EOUIPI{ENT
PARKING CO'.IPANY OF AMERICA
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I.II LLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES
PERSOiIIIEL EXAI.IINAT IONS
SI,iELLY I.IEL tS PLUMBING
DEPOSII REFUNDS
I}IAGI STICS II]TERNATIONAL
OFF ICE EXPENSE
LUDLOI,J & ASSOCIATES
MISC. SUPPLIES
561.30 526 690?0 260
620 66700 260
2216A Ap
22479
?2496
22500
22751
22753
23022
23035417IacRI TICAL SOLU oNS, INC.
PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
T. RANDOLPH GRANGE
Itl I SCELLANEOTJS
81750 us LAcRossE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44749
84751
84752
23143
23?90HAI F I.IULLINS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SIERRA OFf I CE SUPPLIES
OTT I CE EXPENSE
23301
81753 BOTSE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306
OFFICE EXPENSE 161.65 '10'1 65200 1,t0
84740 OUEIIVOLDS SAFETY SHOEI/TOBI LES
TRAI}IING EXPENSE
TRAIIIING EXPENSE
23001r
CITY OF BURLINGAME
TIA R R A N T R E G I S T E R
08/16t02 PAGE 7
AMOUNT
1 ,017 .26
87 .98
8,034.03
1,750,oo
3,395.00
17,365.00
251 ,
62.73
307.66
19.03
561 .08
500.00
72.53
NUI{BER NATIE
84724
84725 CIIIGULAR UIRELESS
co,tt{uN r cAT ! 0N s
84726 TURBO DATA SYSTEI4S, INC.
I.{ I SCELLANEOUS
84727
VE}IDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
INC.21631 AP
31?.14
305.71
279.97
86.32
63.12
ACCOUNI
87.98 526 69020 160
8,054.03 101 570,10
1,750.00 101 68010 220 1423
5,595.00 320 80510 210
17,365.00 101 37010
251,A6 101 68020 200 2200
ARAIIARK UNI FoRtl
UNI FORI.iS AXD
U}I I FORMS AND
UN I FORMS AND
UN I FORI1S AND
UN I FORXS AND
SERVI CES,
EOUIPMENT
EOUIPMENT
EOUI PI.IENT
EOUI PI{ENI
EAUIPI.IENT
'101 66210 110
526 69020 110
527 66520 110
619 61160 140
620 66700 140
?1816
44728 SIBB ATD ASSOCIATES, IilC.
PROTESSIOI,IAL & SPECIALIZEO S
21863 AP
84729 sAN ATEo CCt.tNTy CONTROLLERS OtF 21897
}II SCELLAIiE(lJS
81730
ARCH L] I RE LESS
COI,IMUN I CAT I ONS
COMMUNICATIONS
81732 SPALDING SPORTS
MISC. SUPPLIES
EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
REED EOUI PI,IEIIT CO
EOt',I PI.IENT MAINT.
AT&T
cot4Mu I CAT I0NS
ROBERTS ANO BRUNE
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
11 .A2
20.91
101 66210 160
527 66520 160
307.66 529 68030 120 42oo
19.05 't0l 65100 160
361.08 526 69020 120
500.00 731 225?5
72.53 101 65200 205
21767
21980
22089
2?116
22138
22178
?2241
2?250
84731
44733
44731
81735 STELLA IIUNG
I{I SCELLANEOIJS
417'6 ALLIED ROPES
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
22384
271.40 101 68010 200 110r
271.4084737 i KE ELOilDINO
EOUIPI{EI,IT I.IAI NT.
NUiIBER NAI.IE
44709
81710
84711
8471?
84713
8/.714
44720
RACOUE] SI'II TH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44715 Ptirl scoTT
TRAVEL & iIEETINGS
84716 DELL MARKETING L. P.
CAPITAL EOUIPMENT
84717 ourcK t4lx coNcRETE
SIDEIJALK REPAIR EXPENSE
CITY OF BURLINGAI,4E
UA R R A N T R E G I S T E R
08/16/02
VENDOR OETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks
19827
ACCOUNT
2,517.34 734 6519s 800
1,A70.11 320 805.10 220
1,05?.48 621 64150 200
660.00 621 61150 160
159.19 320 78190 120
7,142.40 101 68010 220 1782
500.00 527 66520 250
1,651.94 527 65530 800
DELTA SAEETY SUPPLY CO
CAPITAL EOUIPI,IENT
PEI]INSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GE CAPITAL
CITY HALI T.IAINTENANCE
AFF I NITEL COMMUNICATIONS
co'll.lt llIcaTIol,ts
CENTRAL GAROEN CEIITER
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
RED!]OOO GENERAL TIRE
SUPPLIES
LINDA D. NEIJTON
I.,II SC. SUPPLIES
20216
20246
20339
20550
20900 AP
21178
21216
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
2,547.34
1,870.11
1 ,052.4a
660.00
159.19
7,142.40
5 00.00
1,611 .91
532.32
2,371,00
1,110.94
1 ,072.76
1 ,800.00
66.71
21140
532,3? 101 65210 ?19
84718 ESA ENVIRONI.IE}ITAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21'160 AP
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S 2,371,00 101 64350 210
84719 Ar/N ltusso
OFfICE EXPENSE
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & MEETINGS
54A.14
193.30
369.50
101 64200 110
10r 65200 120
101 64200 250
2149A
817?? ctTICoRP VENDOR NANCE, lNC.
EOUIPI.IEXT I.IAIIIT.
215?1
1,072.76 620 15000
1,800.00 320 79580 120
66.71 101 65200 200
81723 SAVIN CORPORAT ION
OTTICE EXP€}ISE
21630
453.15 101 68010 110 1101
153.45
20060 AP
20300
CI TY OF BURLINGAIIEI]A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
08/16/02
VENDOR DETAI Lrir Denotes Hand trritten Checks
PAGE 5
AI.4OUN T
1 ,528.20
4,238.00
102- 00
39.37
1 ,981.50
701,897.00
206,930.00
111.a4
146.83
662.76
370.09
124 .79
9,r13.40
900.00
NUMBER NAI.IE
84694
84695
84697
81698
81699
81700
84701
81701
44706
ACCOUNT
3,5?8.20 101 68010 220 1372
PARAI.IOUNT I S GREAT AI.IERICA
iIISC. SUPPLIES
CO}ITRACTUAL SENVICES
44696 CRA E PEST COiITRoL
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
870
68
101 66010 120't423
101 68010 220 1212
JEFF H IPPS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
DENNIS J. AXOROSO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
JJR COIISTRUCTION
CONTRACTUAT SENVICES
IMAGEHAX, INC,
MISCELLAIIEOIJS
L/ILSEY & IiA}.I
PROIESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
17803
18078
18103
18830
18970
1a979
19027
19047
19085
19145
19239
3,3
00
00
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
U7O2 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES
I{ I SC. SUPPLIES
44703 A}IGIIEI'SPAPERS
PUSLICATIOIS & ADVERTISING
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
511.80
120.96
'101 64200 150
320 80700 120
VERIZON I'IRELESS I.IESSAGING SERVI 18763
co fiuNIcATI0NS
NATURCLEAN
lltsc. SUPPLIES
102.00 619 64460 210 5110
39.37 526 69020 160
1,984.50 527 66520 120
701 ,a97.00 320 76010 220
205,930.00 320 75110 220
'111.84 't01 65200 220
146.83 320 80700 120
19397 AP
84707 I.IINGES ARCIIITECTURE & PLAIINING
t,I I SCE L LAN EOI.JS
19471
370.09 731 22518
121.79 527 66520 130
9,513.40 320 80600 210
900.00 731 22525
84708 CREATIVE I}ITERCONNECT
CO4MUNICAI IOIIS
197fa
2?8.36 101 55200 150
228.36
41705 PRIORITY 1
SI.IALL T@LS
CITY OF BURLINCAII{E!,4 R R A N T R E G I S T E R
08t16/02
VENDOR DETAI L.*r Denotes lland !/ritten Checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 4
AMOJI/T
659.57
2.00
50.00
14.89
948.58
189.90
56.00
44.13
42.56
399.70
225.69
78.75
84679 AT&T
coiiituN I cAr I 0N s
UTILITY EXPENSE
SAN I4ATEO LOCK I,IORKS
MISC. SUPPLIES
PARKIN SECURITY CO},ISULTANTS
PERSONNEL EXAI.4INATIONS
2.00 101 68010 120 1111
50,00 101 64420 121
395.88
263.69
873.58
75.00
520 15000
620 66700 200
NUI,4BER TIAME
84680
84681
81683
84684
44645
84686
84689
81690
a4691
44692
13940
11643
't5250
15739
15764
15827
16066
1691 1
171?8
17102
17414
17177
17497
CINIAS CoRP. #46/r
UNI FORI.IS AIID EOUI PI.{EIIT
81(87 GOLDEN I/URSERY
},I I SC. SUPPLIES
84688 GALL ' S, INC.
SUPPLIES
I,'ETRO MOBI LE COMMUIII CATIONS
COMMUII I CAT IONS
VALLEY OIL CO.
SUPPLIES
EOUIPI{ENT I'{AINT.
M D LINEII SERVICE
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
JOSEPH III LL IAI.I I.ICCLAITI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COLORPRINT DIGITAL
OFFICE EXPENSE
189.90 101 65200 ?20
56,00 101 68010 220 1787
1,0n.47 101 68020 140 2200
11.43 526 69020 120
82.56 520 15000
399.70 101 65300 160
310.00 't 0'1 36600
78.75 101 65300 110
PR IDE PAINI
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT.
t.I I SC. SUPPLIES
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
114
54
56
101 68020
526 690?0
619 64160
190 2200
'120
120 5200
DAVID I.IAN I
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
85
02
84693 CRAIG COCCELLATO
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
17732 300.00
8464? MI LLBRAE LOCK SHOP
l|IISC. SUPPLIES
621 64450 160
896 202A1
14.89 101 68020 120 2200
1,079.47
3'10.00
17304
300.00 nl 22520
CITY OF BURLINGAI.IE},ARRATIT REGISTER
08/16/02
120
2't9
222
260 2200
120
120
PAGE 3
Atrl0u T
2,110,51
1,041.80
8,150.35
476.00
160.00
67 ,50
5,324.56
1 ,369.20
I.IU[8EN NAME
84670
84671
84672
81673
44674
CRAIC T/. REED
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
ANA FITZGERALD
COiITRACTUAL SERVICES
176.00 10't 68010 220 1787
160.00 101 58010 ??O 1617
67.50 320 79020 210
SAN },IATEO LAI.IN MOIJER SHOP
SI'IALL TOOLS
EAUIPMENT I.IAINT,
FIRE APPARATUS I.IA I NT.
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
101 66210 't30
101 68020 200 2300
10'l 65200 203
101 68020 400 2100
VEI{DOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
09560
09790
09881
87.97
430.85
141.99
I ,746,70
262
308
399
13
45
90
ACC0U T
66210
66210
66210
68020
69020
66520
ORCHARD SUPPLY TIARDIIARE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
BLDG. & GROU}IDS MAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS I,iAINT.
57.11
918.44
66.25
101 65200 120
101 65100 190
101 65200 205
IIIIERSTATE TRAFTIC
I.I I SC. SUPPL IES
SIDEI,'ALK REPAIR EXPETISE
TRAFF IC CONTROL MATERIALS
IRAINING EXPEI,ISE
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
71
51
43
30
17
93
7
101
l0l
101
101
526
527
09975
1110181675i4EYERS, NAVE, RtEACK, SILVER
PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S
84676 BURLI NGAI4E POLICE OEPT
OFFICE EXPENSE
tl I SC. SUPPLIES
UNI FORiIS AND EOUIP}IENT
co,fi4uN I cAT I oN s
BLDG. & GROI',IIDS I.IAINT.
EOUI PI.IENT MAINT.
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
lRAIIIING EXPE}ISE
PRISONER EXPE}ISE
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE
I,IISCELLAI/EOTJS
CAPITAL EOUIPMEIIT
UNI FOR}IS AND EOUIPI.IENT
'11720
13743
1 ,151.90
1 ,781 .65
159.74
2.O2
105,37
232.
20.00
290.92
126.78
180.00
431 .00
433.00
106.32
1,369.20 731 22560
84678 ICBO- INII L CONFERENCE OF
I.I I SC, SUPPLIES
13834 '10.56 101 65300 120
10.56
101 65150 110
10r 55400 120
'101 65100 110
101 65100 160
'10't 65100 190
101 65150 200
101 65100 240lot 65100 260
101 65100 291
101 65100 29?
101 65100 703
'101 65100 800
734 65195 140
09670
81677 BOETIIIT,IG TREELAND FARMS, I}IC.
I,IISCELLANEOUS
CITY OF BURLINGAME},ARRANT REGISTER
08/ 16t02
VENDOR OETAI L
'*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
NIJi,{BER NAI'4E
81656 PATTERSON PARTS, INC
FTRE APPARATUS I.IAI IIT.
SUPPLIES
FIRE APPARATUS I{A T [T.
84657 SANDRA POEE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84659 T II4BERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84660
03106
03175
03380
03760
0382'l
09143
09433
2,322.36
207,51
734.00
55,00
2,070.68
96.65
344.46
14.61
101 65200 203
620 15000
625 65213 203
ACCOUNT
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
455 .72
'1, 140.00
I ,255 .00
475.00
5,389,55
898.71
157.17
I ,1A9 .75
18,200.00
37.18
1,'140.00 101 68010 220 ,1641
1,255.00 620 66700 120
175.00 101 68020 220 23oO
3,000.00 101 64250 114
039',10
81662 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUC]S, INC.
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
09112
81663
BURLIIIGAiIE REC. DEPT./PEITY CASH
l{ I sc. SUPPL I ES
UNIFORMS ANO EOUIPI.IENT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TRAINING EXPENSE
I.I I SCELLAIEqJS
84661
81664
U S POSTAL SERVI CE
MI SCELLANEOUS
LYIIGSO GAROEN iIATERIALS
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
SAFETY KLEEN CORP.
REIITS & LEASES
SAN MATEO COI,NTY SXERIFFIS OFC.
COIIIRACTUAL SERVICES
101 68010
101 68020
101 68010
101 68020
731 22513
1330
2200
1614
2200
120
140
220
260
09168
81665 oLY|.|PIA[ OIL CO{PA{Y
GAS, OIL & GREASE
09238
81666 TESTI NG ENGI IIEERS, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81667 TURT & INDUSTRIAL EOUIPI4ENT CO.
SUPPLIES
09319
84668
110.12 101 68010 120 1587
898.71 101 68020 120 2200
457.17 101 68020 180 2200
9,489.75 101 65100 201
18,200.00 320 80231 220
37.18 620 15000
30,587.00 101 55500 220
84669 SIERRA PACI FIC TURF SUPPLY
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
09459
405.91 529 68030 120 4200
405 .94
3,000.00
110.42
30,587.00
84658 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONI,IE},ITAL
lil I SC. SUPPLIES
09270 AP
CI TY OF EURLINGAME},ARRA}IT REGISTER
08/16t02
VENDOR DETAIL
'*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks
NUMBER NAME
84642 ACTION CLEANING SERVICE
CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
84613 ALPI NE AIiARDS, INC.
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
84644 IIARBOR SAND & GRAVEL
t'I I SC. SUPPLIES
81645 GENE EVANS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84646 EL'ING IRRIGATIO},I PROOUCTS
I,4 I SCELLANEOUS
84647 !,. L/. GRAIIGER, IuC.
TRAFFIC CONTROL I,4ATERIALS
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
81618
ACCOUNT
15,000.00 527 66520 220
23.27 527 66520 120
56.37 101 66210 120
351.00 101 68010 220 1644
739.12 101 68020 192 2200
01030
01313
02119
02157
02248
0?615
02819
02898
03011
03051r
28.09
59.43
13.03
24.85
36.81
933.47
68010 1
68020 1
68020 1
66210 2
80790 1
69020 1
PAGE '1
AMOUI,IT
15,000.00
56.37
351 .00
739.12
367 .57
732.31
97.10
153.60
I ,096.08
34.64
10.23
02261
8r',649 HARDIIIG ESE, INC.
PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S
02365
84650
GRA}IITE NOCK COMPANY
STREET RESURFACI }IG EXPETISE
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
K & T' DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
iIANPOI'ER
TET.IPORARY EMPLOYMEIIT SVC.
36.32
65 .06
101 66210 222
527 66520 ',t20
179.21
188.36
101 66210 226
5?6 69020 120
732.31 528 66600 210
97.10 619 64460 120 5121
153.50 101 65300 011
81651
84653
84611
I.II LLBRAE LUI.IBER CO.
MISC. SUPPLIES
8LDG. & GROUNDS I,IAI NT.
XISCELLANEOUS
SIDEI'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
'101
101
101
101
320
526
20
90
92
19
?o
20
2200
2200
PACIFIC NURSERIES
I,{ I SC. SUPPLIES
P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
81655 PACI FIC BE LL
UTILITY EXPEI]SE
03080 3,307.97
0'1052
101 .38
84652
3tt.61 529 68030 ,120 4200
3,307.97 896 2028'l
GE}IERAL TUNO
CAPITAL II4PROVEI'{ENTS TUIID
IIAIER CAPITAL PROJECT TUNO
SEI,/ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I,'A]ER TUND
SEWER FUND
SOLID TJASTE FUND
GOIF CENIER FUND
FACI LITIES SERVICES FUND
EOUIPMETIT SERVICES FUND
INTORMATION SERVICES FUND
IIRE MECHAI{IC SERVICES FUND
TRUST AIID AGENCY FUND
STATE GRAI.IIS FUND
UTILITY REVOLVIIIG FUXD
08-08-2002
NAME
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS I VE ,
THE Ai4OUNT
OFFICIALS,
ACCORDAI,JCE
RESPECTTULLY SUBMITTED,
CI TY OF EURLINGAI,{EI,IARRANT RECISTER
IUND RECAP . 02.03
413.88
325 -61
185.00
150.00
536.07
682.19
731 .63
621.92
87
102
I
12
?04
2
35
7
1
10
1
3
FUIID
101
320
326
327
526
527
528
529
519
620
621
625
731
734
896
PAGE 12
AliouIT
670.59
629.86
17 .36
551.33
685.50
214.06
421 .88
s175 ,441 .91TOIAL FOR APPROVAL
HOIIORAELE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
CERIITY THAT THE CLAII.IS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED TROI.I 1 THROTJGH 12
AND,/OR CLAIt.IS NUI.IBERED FROM 84466 THROUGII 84590 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
OF $475,411.91, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED i}Y THE PROPER
ANO IN I.IY OPINIOII REPRESENT FAIR AIID JUST CHARGES AGAIIIST TIIE CITY TiII'ITH THEIR RESPECTIVE A}IOUNTS AS INDICATEO THEREO},I.
FI}IANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVEO FOR PAYI'IENT
COUICIL DATE
DATE
08-08- 2002
CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E!]ARRANT REGISTER
Fullo RECAP - 01.02
PAGE 11
NAI'IE FUND
101
526
731
AI.IOUNI
$239 ,388.37
GENERAL FUNO
ITIATER FUND
TRUST AND AGENCY TUND
941
760
682
11,
217 ,
9,
82
71
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORASLE IiIAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO
I NCLUS IVE,
THE A}iOT,IIT
0tt tcIALs,
ACCORDANCE
RESPECTFULLY SUBtlITTED,
CERTIFY TNAT THE CLAII4S LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FRO.I 1 THROUGI{ 11
AND/OR CLAI S NUi|BEREo FRoM 84465 TEROUGH 84590 INCLUSM,TOTALTNG INOI $239,388,37, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED iY THE PROPER
AND IN I,4Y OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST TIIE CITY IN
t.,ITH THEIR RESPECIIVE AI,IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROVED FOR PAYI.IENT
DATE
DATE
. .......... . ..... . .... ., ./
cou[cI L
08-08- 2002
CITY OF BURLINGAMELIARRANT REGISTER
FUND RECAP . 02-03
PAGE 10
Ar,{0u}lT
99,358.70
102,325.64
1 , /+85,00
450.00
230,298.91
204,682.19
2,731 .63
35,621.92
7,670.59
1 ,629.86
17.36
551 .33
?0 ,368.21
1,214.06
3,121 .88
NAME FUIID
GENERAL TUND
CAPI TAL II,4PROVEI.IENTS FUND
IIATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUNO
SEI,IER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
I,JATER FUND
SEI.,ER FUNO
SOLID L/ASTE FUND
GOLF CENTER FUND
TACILITIES SERVICES FUI,ID
EOUIPMENT SERVICES FUND
INFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND
rIRE I.IECIIANIC SERVI CES FUND
TRUST A}ID AGENCY FUIID
STATE GRANTS FUNO
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND
101
320
326
327
526
5?7
528
529
619
620
621
625
731
734
896
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL
HONORAELE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO
I NCLUSIVE,
THE AI,4OUNT
OFF I C IALS,
ACCORDAIlCE
CENTIFY TIIAT TIIE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES I,IUiIBERED FROI,I 1 THROUGH 'IO
AND/OR CLAIMS NUI.IBERED FROM 84466 THROUGH 84590 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING II,I
0F $714,830.28, HAVE BEEN CfiECKED lN oElAtL AND APPROVED By THE pROpER
AND II,I MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
I.IITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IO{JiITS AS INDICATED THEREOII.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
TEDAFINANCE DIRECIOR
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
col.JNct t DATE
$714,830.28
84582
CITY OF BURLINGAME!,4 R R A N T R E G I S T E R
0a/0a/o2
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tritten Checks
NUI,4BER NAME
84580 BRAD LOOSE
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
84581 DLT SOLUTION, INC
MISC. SUPPLIES
DEMARTINI ARNOTT PAINTING
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
84583 ILS CA]|PS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84584 OAVE CREAI'IER
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
84585
84590 SEREND I PI TY LA}ID YACH]S
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
TOTAL
ACCOUNT
50.00 731 22520
2,631.53 101 66100 120
300.00 731 22520
1,040.00 101 68010 220 1372
600.00 101 6a010 220 1646
610.00 101 68010 220 1545
84.00 101 61120 210
2,400.00 731 22516
5.17 101 68010 170 1111
57.00 101 61120 240
1,072.40 101 68010 120 1423
23872
23873
23874
23475
23876
23877
?3878
23879
23880
234a1
23882
PAGE 9
ATIOUNT
50.00
2,634.53
300.00
1,040.00
600- 00
540.00
84.00
2,400.00
3.17
57,00
1,072.10
$714,830.28
I,4ELISSA GINSEERG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
815 COI'INTY SCHOOL SERVICE FUND
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
44547 KARP FAI,4I LY TRUST
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
84588 AT&T BROAOBAND
GAS & ELECTRIC
84589 ELEi.IENT K JOURNALS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIOIIS
CITY OT BURLIN6AI4EI,IARRAIIT REGISTER
08/08/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*! Denotes Hahd l,lritten Checks
ACC0Ut'tT
PAGE 8
AI,4OUNT
3,602.97
200.00
8,117,21
2,178.00
75 .00
757.
300.00
240.00
240.00
640.00
300.00
760.00
200.00 101 65200 210
81566 DCE DESIGN,COI,4I,4UNIIY & ENVIRONI,IE 23781 AP
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZEO S 8,117.21 't01 64400 210
84567
PACI FIC BELL/WORLOCOI,4
CoI'IMUN I CAT I0NS
UTI L ITY EXPENSE
EASIC I'IoDULAR FACILITIES
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
cltE!.tsEARcH
SIDELIALK REPAIR EXPENSE
BRIAN ROCHE
I.I I SCELLAI.IEOUS
SHELLY NELSOTI
iII SCELLANEOUS
JOHN R00GERS
DEPOSIT RETUNDS
I4I KE SPILLANE
DEPOSIT REFUNDS
&5N POPOV PROPERTIES
XTSC. SUPPLIES
181.09
3 ,421 .88
101 65150 160
896 20281
NUI'{BER NAI.4E
81564
84565
84569
84570
81571
84572
845f3
84571
81575
84576
84578 RS DIEKXAII ANO ASSOC
DEPOS IT REFUNDS
SAN I.IATEO COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASS 25762
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
KAREN LIU
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
2372A
23823
23a41
23862
23863
23861
?386'
23866
23867
23868
23869
23870
84568 I,4AD SCIENCE OF THE BAY AREA
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
367.50 l0l 68010 220 1615
2,178,OO 101 68010 220 1319
757.98 731 225A7
300.00 731 ?25?0
863.85 101 66210 219
240,00 101 36620
240.00 't01 36620
540.00 731 22520
300.00 731 22520
450.00 327 78536 120
760.00 731 22520
NORCAL I,IUI{ I CI PAL PERSOI'INEL I,4AIIAG 2386'1
TRAVEL & I,4EETINGS
CITY OF HALF MOOII BAY
M I SCELLANEOUS
84579 SYSTE S PAVI [c, INC,
DEPOSI T REFUIIDS
23871 300.00 731 22520
300 -00
367.50
863.85
450,00
75,00 101 61420 250
CI TY OF BURLINGAMEL'ARRANT REGISTER
08/08/02
VENDOR OETAIL!*r Denotes Hand llritten Checks
ACCOTJNT
PAGE 7
AI,4OUNT
335.86
1 , 109.25
'1,7t0.00
61 .61
408.15
175.00
49.00
71 .29
398.21
251 .79
1, 160.00
2,029.32
362.67
17 .36
IIUI.IBER NAI.IE
84549
84550 CPS
84551
84552
84553
84551
84555
84556
81559
84560
84561
84562
IMAGISTICS INTER',IATIONAL
OTFICE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
13.86
29?.00
101 65't00 lt0
'101 65100 220
255 .74
112,47
101 64250 110
101 66100 120
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS
22921
23005
23082
23096
23156
23169
23510
23512 AP
24572
23654
23661
1,109.25 101 64420 121
1,750.00 101 61560 220
61.61 ',101 54400 ll0
408.',15 101 68010 '120 1899
175.00 101 54420 030
49.00 101 65200 160
71.29 101 66210 222
23214
u557 BolsE cAscADE ot cE pRoDUcTs co 23306
OFFICE EXPEIISE
lil I SC. SUPPLIES
84s58
THE I }INOVATIO},I GROUPS
COIJTRACTUAL SERVICES
THE ORAIJING BOARO
OFF I CE EXPENSE
PEPSI BOTTL I NG GROUP
I.{I SC. SUPPLIES
TLC ADI,4I I,I I STRATORS
t'l I SCELLANEoI.JS
AT&T I.JIRELESS
COI'iMUN I CAT IONS
KELLY IIIOORE PAI NT CO
TRAF FIC CONTROL }.|ATERIALS
KORALEEN EIITERPRISES
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
UNION ELECTRI C CONSTRUCT ION
CO},ITRACTUAL SERVICES
SCS ENGII]EERS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S
AI&T
c0Mr,tul,rrcATIoNs
251.79 526 69020 120
1,150.00 101 6a010 220 1762
2,029.32 320 80190 220
362.67 52A 66600 210
17.36 621 64150 160
84563 SCS IIELD SERVICES
PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
23727
1,388.96 528 65600 210
1 ,588.96
I.IUI,{BER NAME
81535
84536
81538
84539
84540
44541
84512
84543
81511
84545
84546
84517
529 36714
529 68030 213
529 68030 220
1 .19
I .19
101 55300 160
526 69020 160
PAGE 6
35,624.92
150.00
2.38
328 - 78
4,214.06
92.10
316,09
12,910.75
/.3.0'l
1,555.00
1 ,241 .23
CITY OF BURLINGAI'4E!,ARRANT REGISTER
08/08/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes tland Lrritten Checks
ACCOJNT
VB GOLF LLC
MI SCELLANEdJS
RECREATION PROGRAI.4 EXPENSE
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
22006
22070
22138
22178
22203
2235a
2?407
2?479
22620
22682
22769
22821 AP
10,838.52
2,286.30
22,500.00
GUAC PAYI4ENT PROCESSI NG CE},ITER
I.II SC. SUPPLIES
AT&T
COMMUN I CA] IONS
COMI.IUN I CAT IONS
ROEERTS AND ERUNE
I,4I SC. SUPPLIES
TJORKSAFE TECHNOLOGIES
CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT
CASCADE f IRE EOUIPI.4ENT
FIRE APPARATUS iIAI}II.
CUTTERS EDGE
I.I I SCELLANEOUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAI },IT.
OUENVOLDS SAFETY SIIOEI.IOBI LES
UNI FORI'IS AND EOUIPMENT
CqJNTY OF SAN I.IATEO
COITTRACTUAL SERVICES
TURF STAR
EOUIPMEIIT I.iAINT.
CHRIS I,i I LANO
I{I SCELLAI]EC[',S
GLASER AND ASSOCTATES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
843.44 101 66100 120
150.00 101 68020 200 2300
1,214.06 rJ4 65190 800
125,91 101 65200 205
-1.30
93.40
101 23611
101 65200 203
316.09 101 68020 140 2200
12,910.75 101 65200 220
43.01 101 58020 200 2200
1,555.00 731 22533
1 ,281.2' 101 65200 220
84548 PE}IINSULA FORD OF SA}.I BRUNO
SUPPLIES
22894
121,20 620 15000
121 .20
AMOUNT
843.44
125.91
21948
81537 SARTOR SAI' LiORKS
EOUI PI.IEI.IT TIA I IIT.
528.78 101 66?10 120
IIU}IBER IIAI.IE
CITY OF BURLINGAI,iE},4 R R A N T R E G I S T E R
08/08/02
VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
PAGE 5
A[O[,NT
70,771.56
640.00
2,185.00
90.93
800.00
198.55
9,682.71
1 ,333.00
102.69
855.00
491 ,95
5,302.50
'l ,327 ,60
116.00
84520 I4IKE BROI.IN ELECTRI C CO.
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
81521 JASOiI G I LI.IORE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
845?2 ROfiAN & LOI'GEE, INC.
PROFESSIOIIAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S
TRAINING EXPENSE
81523 FRANCOTYP. POSTAL IA, INC.
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVI CES
84525 OUICK MIX CONCRETE
S IOEI,/ALK REPAI R EXPENSE
us26 ESA EI{VIRONi.IENTAL SCIEIICE ASSOC
DEPOSIT RETUND
845?7 COUNTY OF SA TIATEO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8/.528 SPARTAN TOOL LLC
SI.IALL TOOLS
8,/!.529 fRISCO DEL ROSARIO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
81531 SKYflAgKS SPORTS ACADEI.{Y
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
81532 NEII/OR( IELECOIPUTING
CAPITAL EOUIPI.4ENI
84533 EUIIICE JEA}I !]ALCHA
CONIRACIUAL SERVICES
ACCOtiNT
70,774.56 320 79103 220
640.00 10t 68010 220 ,t646
20a94
20926
20963
20967
21140
21160 AP
21209 AP
21329
21513
21741
21AU
21933
485
700
00
00
326 7A280 2.10
526 69020 260
90.93 101 65100 220
800.00 101 58010 220 133,1
198.55 101 66210 219
9,682.71 731 22590
1,333.00 101 65150 220
402.69 5?7 66520 130
855.00 tot 68010 220 1349
491.95 625 65213 203
5,302.50 101 68010 220 1372
416.00 101 68010 220 1617
81534 PROVIDEIICE PEST TERI.4ITE
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S
21947
120.00 619 64460 210 5150
120.00
4t521 RENEE RAIISEY
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
21136
84530 UilIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC.
FIRE APPARATUS I4AINT.
1,327.60 320 80420 800
CITY OF BURLINGAI,{EI'A R R A N T R E G I S T E R
oat08/02
VENDOR DETAI L.*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks
NUII1EER NAI4E
84505
81506
84507
84508
84509
84511
84512
84513
84514
84515
44516
84517 DAPPER TIRE CO., I}IC.
SUPPLIES
84518
PEIIINSULA DI GI TAL IMAGING
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
CALI FORIIIA PNEUI,4ATIC TOOL COl{Isc. suPPLlEs
JEFF HIPPS
COIITRACTUAL SERVICES
CENTRAL BUSINESS EOUIPMENT
OF F ICE EXPENSE
CAL I TORN IA SOCIETY OF
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING
BUR]O}I I S FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE APPARATUS MAI IIT.
SIGNET TESTIIIG LAES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
NOEL SHEN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PACIfIC GAS & ELEC]RIC
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
RACOUET SI,II TH
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
C. H. BULL COI.IPANY
MI SC. SUPPLIES
914.40
493,89
320 40240 120
527 56520 120
-263.15
3,515 .81
320 23611
320 80420 800
48.61 101 66210 120
2,9a1.55 101 68010 220 1372
s68.85 101 65'100 110
25.00 101 61120 150
518.93 101 6t200 200
59.38 625 65213 203
18,269.33 320 76010 210
120.00 tot 680't0 220 1785
4,235.53 320 76010 210
6,62A.A0 101 68010 220 1782
458.50 527 66520 120
112.58 620 15000
17531
17741
17803
180'l 1
18806
19131
19367
19155
20335
20339
20159
20464
20706
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
1 ,408.29
48.61
2,981 .55
568-85
25.00
5 18,93
59.38
14,269 .33
120.00
1,235,53
6,628.80
458.50
'1 12.58
3,252.66IlICRO L'AREHOUSE
(I SCELLAI,IEOUS
CAPI TAt EOUIPI.IENT
84519 SPORTS CHOI CE
I'I I SC. SUPPLIES
20815
773.58 101 58010 120 1787
78.5A
ACCoUNT
84510 I.4IIIOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEiIS
EOUI PI.IENT I.4AINT.
19366
CITY OF EURLINGAI.iEI/ARRANT REGISTER
08/oa/02
ACC0UIIT
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
112.24
32.00
I ,531.1'
735.02
149.74
333.33
2.900.00
54.11
20.87
15.86
390.00
NUMBER }IAME
84490
u491
84492
a4493
84496
84497
84498
84199
84500
84501
84502
84503
LI FE ASSIST
r,4l scELLAt{ECn'S
SUPPLIES
STERI CYCLE, I'IC.
SUPPLIES
CALLANDER ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S
OEL L. r.,!tLLERr rNC.
SUPPLTES
THE MAGIC PRESS CORP.
OFF I CE EXPENSE
I.4I SC. SUPPLIES
CI.IDR. JACK VAN ETTEN
BLDG. & GROUIIDS I.IAI NT.
SAN MATEO LOCK !/ORKS
t'{ I sc. suPPLtEs
CITY OF BELI.iO},IT
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT,
coN 8Rosr,rAN
OEPOSIT REFUNDS
SYONEY I,{ALKOO
SMALL TOOLS
DISCOUNT SCI{OOL SUPPLY
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
HUIIICIPAL HAI NTENANCE
SUPPL IES
KATHY DEJESUS
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
VENDOR DE]AIL
'*' Denotes Hand l.rritten Checks
09392
09139
2
4
101 236t ,|
101 65200 112
600.79
933.66
101 65100 110
101 65400 120
91
333
09199
84494 ALERT DoOR SERVICE, tllc.
PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZEO S
10059
84495
137.26 101 61200 112
112.24 320 71171 210
32.00 620 15000
485.00 619 64460 210 5110
09461
13759
11012
11643
15456 AP
16126
16460
16629
85.02 101 65100 190
149.71 101 68010 120 1111
2,900.00 731 ?2520
51.11 620 66700 130
20.87 101 68010 120 1370
15.86 620 15000
590.00 101 68010 220 1614
81501 I.IJI.{ CHE}II CAL Co}IPANY
BIDG. & GROUNDS I.IAI NT.
17182 61.51 101 68010 190 ,1101
61.54
16317
16696
311,42
137 .26
485.00
333.33 101 65200 203
CI TY OF BURLINGAT.IE
UA R R A II T R E G I S T E R
08t08/02
VEI'IDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hsnd Lrritteh Checks
NUIIBER NAI.IE
u4n !'. !t. GRATNGER, tilC.
SMALL TOOLS
SMALL TOOLS
84478
84479
84480
84481
84482
84483
u4u
81185
ACCOUNT
402.74
1 ,101.99
101 66210 130
5?6 690?0 130
167.64
99.75
101 66?40 120
527 665?0 120
'f0,033.63 526 69020 120
19,976.23 10',t 66210 170
1,291,50 101 680'10 220 1646
217,760.84 526 69020 171
889.00 101 65100 220
980.00 528 66600 210
1,410.00 320 79102 220
81186 T II{BERLINE IREE SERVICE, INC.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8/,487
84488
GRANIIE ROCK COI.IPANY
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE
K & LI DISCOUNT LIGHTI}TG & SUPP
TI I SC. SUPPLIES
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
US FILTER
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
P. G. & E.
GAS & ELECTRIC
SAIIORA POBE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
SAN FRANCISCO I.IATER DEPT.
I'ATER PURCHASES
CITY OF SAN TIATEO
CONIRACTUAL SERVICES
SEOUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S
!]EST GROI,'P PAYIIENT CTR.
I,I I SC. SUPPLIES
BURL I }IGAI,IE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH
OTTICE EXPENSE
I.I I SC. SUPPLIES
UII I FORI.iS AIIO EAUIPI.4ENT
COIITRACIUAL SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
t'I I SCELLAIIEOTJS
110
120
140
220
240
02248
02261
02645
02880
03054
01353 AP
03366
03536
03760
03910
03964
9,95
139.00
151 .55
492.00
20.00
422,52
101 680't0
101 6a010
'101 68020
101 680'10
101 68020
731 ?2543
PAGE 2
AI,4OUNT
1,504.73
183.18
567.39
10,033.63
19,976.23
1,291,50
217,760.84
889.00
1,110.00
1 ,235 .02
?39.78
1111
1370
2200
1617
2200
239.78 101 54350 120
84189 SAFETY KLEEN CORP.
iENTS & LEASES
09168
206.54 101 68020 180 2200
206.51
03175
980.00
183.48 101 66210 226
CITY OF BURLINGAME[,ARRAIIT RECISTER
08/08/02
VENDOR DETAI Lr*' Denotes Hand l,Jritten Checks
ACCOUNT
PAGE 1
AMOUIIT
755.10
17 ,462.57
1,49',t,74
1 .215.55
2,301.63
1 ,625.00
94.54
3,ln.86
193,203.00
IIUIIEER NAME
81166
81169
81471
44472
81173
81171
84475
ACE HARD}/ARE
I.I I SC. SUPPL I ES
SI.IALL TOOLS
BLDG. & GROU}IDS MAINT.
FIRE APPARATUS I,IAINT.
}I I SC. SUPPLIES
SI,IALL T@LS
S}IALL TOOLS
SUPPLIES
101 65400 120
101 65210 130
101 65200 190
101 65200 203
526 69020 120
526 69020 130
527 66520 130
620 15000
ACTION CLEANING SERVI CE
OFF I CE EXPENSE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COI/TRACTUAL SERVICES
185.04
11.62
396
000
065
101 64250 110
527 56.520 220
619 64460 220 51',10
01027
01030
01059
01507
01621
01617
01663
01676
021 10
2.42
10.73
373.22
76.25
24.36
11 .76
98
00
59
0
7
84168 ALAII STEEL & SUPPLY CO.
8LDG. & GROIJNDS TIAINT.
BURL I IIGAI.IE AUTO SUPPLY
I,4ISC. SUPPLIES
SI,4ALL T@LS
VEHICLE AIXT.
FIRE APPARATUS I.IAI NT.
SUPPLIES
l0t 65200 11'1
101 65300 130
'101 65200 202
101 55200 203
620 15000
16.23 101 58020 190 2200
62.27
72.52
64.64
9.96
1 ,282.35
1,215,55 101 68010 120 1325
2.301.63 101 64530 151
1,625.00 101 10700
91.54 '101 58020 110 2200
54.34
3,125.52
101
101
193,203.00 527 66530 ?20
BURLINGAiIE CHAI.IEER OF COMI.,IERCE
CI{AIIBER OF CO.II{ERCE PMT.
BURLINGAI'IE RECREAT ION DEPT.
RECREAT ION EXPENSES
BURLINGAI,4E STATIONERS
OFFI CE EXPENSE
L. N. CURTIS & SONS
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.
t,I I SCELLANE(xJS
US FILTER OPERATING SERVICES
CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES
65200 203
65200 100
81476 E!/II,IG I RRI GAT ION PRODUCTS
I.IISCELLANEOIJS
02157
88 . 70 101 .f,020 ,t92 2200
88.70
16.23
44467
81470 CITY OF BURLINGAME
rsc. suPPuEs
02027
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 5.2002
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by
Chairperson Locke.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Staff:
Guests:
Chairperson Camey, Locke, Ellis, Hesselgren, Lauder, McGowan and Webb
Superintendent Richmond, Arborist Porter, and Administrative Secretary Harvey
Patricia Harriman, Barbara Young, Richard Young, Evelyn Walker, and Melanie
Anaston
MIhIUTES - The minutes of the Augustl meeting were approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter to David and Katherine Harris, 600 Howard, informing them that the Commission upheld their
Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Monterev Pine in the back yard of their address.
Correspondence relating to the Appeal of the Approval to Remove Three Black Acacia Trees at 813
Paloma Avenue.
Correspondence and an Arborist Report from Mayne Tree Expert Company relating to the Appeal of the
Approval to Remove 2 Black Acacias Trees and a Canarv Island Date Palm.
FROM THE FLOOR
There were no comments from the floor
OLD BUSINESS
Anneal of the Approval to Remove Three Black Acacia Trees @, 813 Paloma Avenue - Arborist
Porter reported that his decision to approve the removal of the three Black Acacia trees was because the
trees had varying degrees of unsound structures, were multi trunked, and that this specie is listed with the
International Society of Arboriculture as having a high rate of whole tree failure due to a shallow root
system.
The Commission discussed location of the trees, the impact ofthe removals on adjacentproperties, weight
reduction pruning and maintenance, property damage, and possible locafions arrd rpe"ies of replacement
trees.
Arborist Porter stated that the trees are located on the property near a utility easement at 813 Paloma; one
of the trees has had a fence built around it from a neighboringproperty. Because this specie of evergreen
tree is very fast growing, weight reduction pruning would need to be done every two years. The tr..r hurr.
caused significant damage to the garage. The property owner has submitted plans io replace the garage.
The required root cutting to replace the garage will render the trees unstable.
Chairperson Locke closed the discussion and opened the hearing to comments from the public.
Richard Young, 8 t 2 Fairfield, stated two other Black Acacias were recently removed by another neighbor
tn the area and have yet to be replaced. He was also unaware that a.r"* gu."g" was being planneJ. He
concluded that the impact will be great and the trees provide homes for all the squinels.
1
OLD BUSINESS - Anpeal of the Annroval to Remove Three Black Acacia Trees @ 813 Paloma
Avenue (Contd.) -
Brrb*" Y"*g."r-ented that the removal will cause a very large impacton the neighborhood; the trees
provide u ,o*l barrier from the traffic; wildlife will be reduced. She added that the previous removals
ihut *.r. allowed has caused the remaining trees to be a hazard. She asked why the replacement tree
required for the previously approved removals had not yet been planted?
Arborist porter stated that a six month extension has been granted for the planting of a 24" box size
replacement tree to be planted at the 809 Paloma Avenue addriss where the previous removals occurred'
Evelyn Walker, 804 Fairfiel{ commented that ifthe trees are ahazard they should be trimmed or removed
but should be ieplaced wrth a specie that will become a significant size. Arborist Porter responded that
the replacement tree must be ui4" bo*size "landscape" tre-e (no fruit or nut trees), but location and specie
is up to the applicant.
Melanie Anaston, g09 paloma Avenue, stated that they removed the 2 Black Acacias in their back yard
because she was told by an independ.ni fuborirt that the Black Acacias were shallow rooted. She feared
that one day the trees would falf over. She commented that she wanted to create a beautifrrl garden, with
a good balance of shade and sun. She concluded that the trees she will be planfirrs 1o replace the two Black
Acacias that were removed at her prope(y *ill grow to be approximately 70' tall.
Chairperson Locke closed the public comment.
Commissionerlauder commented that any motion approving removal would also include replacement wilh
fast growing trees. Superintendent
-Richmond- -advisJd that the Commission could only make
recommendation as to the selection of species.
Commissioner McGowan stated the current edition of the Sunset Garden Book describes Black Acacias
as weed trees; best pi*t"a in open fields. The sail affect of this species inwinter time, combined with a
saturated ground and the shallow rooted nature of this tree, is a hazard to properties. Commission
McGowan commented that even though the ffees may be pleasing aesthetically, he did not believe the
Commission should -J. * applicantleep these potentially hazardous trees on their property.. He noted
that the neighbors in the area iould also piant trees on theii properties to compensate for the lost visual
screen.
Chairperson Locke read a paragtaph from an unrelated arborist report from Mayne Tree Expert Company
in reference to "Black Acacia" trees:
,' . . . Black acacia is a poor landscape species and is not generally recommended for
landscape pt*r. A neighboring town-requires removal of all acacias for a site plan
to receive u Uritang p.i-rrit. Tlis species is generally noxious and invasive. In time,
where there was on-e acacia, there will be several. Fast growth and poor limb
structure make them, in time, ahazard."
Following the discussi on, Comndssioner McGowan moved that the appeal be lenied and the permit
be issueilfor the removal and replacement of rhree Black Acacia trees in the back yatd of the.above
addressl seconded (webb). Moion carriedinanimously. The commission further requested that the
applicant be informed that the Commission strongly recommends that the required planting of 3-24" box
size replace-ent trees be planted in the back y*Jof Urt property to compensate for the lost visual screen
caused by the removal of these evergreen trees'
Chairperson Locke advised the appellants of appeal procedures.
2
OLD BUSIITIESS (Contd.) -
Old Bavshore Boulevard Streetscape - Commissioner McGowan stated that he planned to submit a tree
planting plan for the Old Bayshore Boulevard area, but the Council has now asked that there be a committee
be appointed to conduct a study of the area. The City Planner had inquired if Chafuperson Locke or
Commissioner McGowan would be willing to serve on tle committee. Commissioner McGowan has agreed
to serve and is waiting for word ofhis appoinflnent from the Council. Commissioner McGowan concluded that
he will serve as a representative of the Beautification Commission and will be looking for input from the
Commission.
Snrine Garden Seminar - Date & Proeram Plannine -
The Spring Garden Seminar has been scheduled for March 15, 2003. Commissioner Lauder will submit the
ba::ner application. The Commission discussed possibilities for speakers and will continue the discussion at
the October 3d meeting.
NEW BUSINESS - Nominatine Committee Reoort and Election of Commission Officers - The
following slate of officers was submitted for nomination:
Will McGowan
Nancy Locke
Jo-Ellen Ellis
Chairperson
V. Chairperson
Corresponding S ecretary
Commissioner Hesselgren movedthatthe slateof offi.cers he electedas submitteil; secondeil (Caruey).
M ofion carried unanimously.
REPORTS
Richmond -
1) Five Elms with Dutch Elm disease will be removed by City crews and an additional seven Elms
will be removed by the City's tree contractor. Commissioner McGowan asked Arborist Porter if the
tree crew cleans the equipment after trimming Elm trees to prevent contamination of other Ehns.
Arborist Porter responded that tools are always cleaned after a diseased Elm is removed. He also
pointed out that much of the Dutch Elm Disease in the City is spread by root graft. He indicated
that he would review the proper practices with his crew.
2) An Eagle Scout candidate is interested in updating the Trees of Burlingame booklet first published
n 1977. Diane Condon-Wirgler of the Historical Society will be assisting.
3) Weeds were cleared on the North side of Oak Grove at Califomia Drive. There are no plans for
further work in that area.
4) Presented pictures to the Commission that showed the pruning and crown reduction of the
Eucalyptus trees on Burlingame Avenue; similar technique is being conducted on the El Camino
Real trees by CalTrans contractors.
Superintendent Richmond thanked Commissioner Locke for her past service as Chairperson.
Locke - Chairperson Locke reported that the Council has appointed a committee to study improvements
from Rollins Road, North; the first meeting on September 10'h will be to discuss existing conditions.
Information can be found on the City's website.
Ellis - The trees in the oleander hedge on East Lane (east of the CalTrain tracks) look dead.
Commissioner Ellis asked when the shoreline cleanup had been scheduled. Superintendent Richmond
stated that he believed it would be September 14ft, the same day as the Burlingame Art &, JazzFestival.
3
REPORTS
Ellis - (Contd.)
Commissioner Ellis reported that some newspapers ile putting advertising stickers on the modular racks
and the modular racks are starting to look bad. Commissioner Ellis was advised to report her concem to
the Public Works Department who now oversees newsracks in the City of Burlingame.
Hesselsren - Commissioner Hesselgren stated that to date, only 7 of 1.5 trees have been planted at the
remodeled Porsche, Audi site on the comer of Carolan and Broadway. Arborist Porter stated he would
review the plans and report back to the Commission at the next meeting.
Lauder - Commissioner Lauder reported that weeding has been done on the 101 Broadway triangle.
Chairperson Locke added that because of their frustration and extreme disappointment with CalTrans, she
and Commissioner Lauder have decided to look into applying for the Adopt-A-Highway program; this
would be on an individual basis. Chairperson Locke noted that after all the focused attention for the last
two years given by Commission to the 101 Broadway triangle, CalTrans has made little improvement in
the area. Chairperson Locke invited anyone else from the Commission wishing to join them in the Adopt-
A-Highway would be welcome.
Carney - Commissioner Camey noted that the area South of Oak Grove on California Drive looks better,
but the fence is too low.
There being no further business, Chairperson Locke adjoumed the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
Respectfrrlly submitted,
Recording Secretary
4
M
The City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD
cALtFORNtA 9401G3997
www,burlingame.org
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2002
Commissioners Present: Jim Evans, Vice Chair
Russ Cohen
Lisa De Angelis
Commissioners Absent: Jim Mclver
David Mayer
StaffPresent:
StaffAbsent:
Visitors:
Frank Erbacher, Assistant Public Works Director
Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works
Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works
Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Departrnent
None
Marika Metcalfe, 401 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Rich Peterson, 340 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Scott Mason, 3 44 Occidental Avenue, Burlingame
Terri Malaspina, l512 Chapin Avenue, Burlingame
David Zinman,1400 Carlos Avenue, Burlingarne
Ken Pearce, 1801 Murchison Avenue, Burlingame
l. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. by Vice Chair Evans.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FI-A,G.
3. ROLL CALL. 3 of 5 Commissioners present.
4. CT]RRENT BUSINESS.
4.1 ACTION ITEMS.
4.1.1 Approval of Minutes for August 8, 2002
The minutes were submitted and approved with one corection of ltem 4.2.1, frst paragraph:
replace the last sentence with 'Chair Mclver suggested meeting first with the C-1 and C-3 areas
(including Burlingame Plaza) during the regular September Traffic Commission Meeting. The
Commission will meet later with the M-l area. The last area to meet with will be the R-l area."
4.1.2 Special Meeting to Discuss Hillside Drive Speed Bumps
Vice Chair Evans suggested this meeting be held in conjunction with the next regular Traffic
Commission Meeting and the other commissioners agreed.
4.2.1 Millbrae BART Station - Parking Impacts on City streets - Possible Parking Restrictions -
Commercial Area west of Califomia Drive to Burlingame Plaza Area
Comm. Cohen explained that the Commission is looking for input from the commercial area so
that the city ctul proactively address potential parking problems posed by BART parking in this
area. From the floor, Mr. Pearce already has his private property posted and suggested parking
permits if BART causes a problem.
Mr. Chou advised that he received two resporses: a business at 1860 El Camino Real supports
a two-hour parkhg limit; and a business at 1515 Trousdale Drive has on-site parking for patients
already, but employees park on the street and may be affected by BART customers.
For next month's meeting, notices will be sent to the M-l area east of the railroad tracks to
Highway 101 and up to David Road.
4.2.2 Occidentzl Avenue - Speed Zone Change and Stop Sign Request - Letter
Mr. Chou advised that after looking at speed limits on other streets, staff is comfortable with
consideration of reduction of the speed to 25 mph on Occidental Avenue. Sgt. Cutler advised she
had spoken with two Traffic Cornmissioners - one might have a problem with it, the other would
Page 2
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2OO2
4.2 DISCUS$ON ITEMS.
The City of Budingame
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2OO2
not as long as it was a legal Engineering traffic study and had the same criteria. Mr. Chou
performed a speed study of 200 vehicles on a weekday during non-peak hours and the critical
speed was 32 mph: and although staff would look at making it 30 mph, they will look at other
factors to justiff the 25 mph as part of the sody.
From the floor, Mr. Peterson submitted a petition for their neighborhood to be included in the
Residential Traffic Calming Program and a neighbor's letter and stated that the 25 mph limit
would be terrific. However, he also strongly favors 4-way stop signs at Occidental and Chapin
Avenues. Ms. Metcalfe stated exiting her driveway is very difhcult with speeding traffic going
by. She recormnends stop signs and 25 mph limit. Mr. Mason stated although 25 mph limit is not
the best idea, stop signs are necessary. Mr. Malaspina stated he can hear drivers "punch it"
coming offof El Camino Real and go speeding by all the time.
Mr. Erbacher advised that there have been only two accidents in the htJ '90's which could have
been due to speed, and the traffic volume and pedestrian volume are too low to warrant stop signs
at this site. Therefore, if this commission recommends stop signs to Council, staffwould disagree.
Vice Chair Evans supports lowering the speed to 25 mph as a first step and using interxive potice
enforcement to see what effect it would have on the traffic, as well as installing enlarged speed
limit signs. Sgt. Cutler advised that the speed would be radar-enforced as a result of the speed
survey. It was moved and seconded (comms. De Angelis/cohen) to make this an Action item
immediately. It was then moved and seconded (comms. De Angelis/cohen) to recommend to
Council to reduce speed to 25 mph between EI Camino Real and Barroilhet Avenue with increased
police enforcement and to install enlarged speed limit signs and rwo speed Enforced by Radar
signs, one each way, and to include this site in the Police Deparfiient's Selective Enforcement
Report. Unanimously approved by the Commission.
Mr. Mason asked that the intersection be marked with 25 mph in the pavement as well. Mr.
Erbacher state{that speed markings on pavement are usually not done due to maintenance costs;
instead, the City will install raised centerline markers near the Floribunda intersection and the
Chapin intersection to encourage reduced speed.
4.2.3 loint Council-Commission Meeting - October 7,2002,6:30 p.m.
After a brief discussion, staff agreed to prepare a list of items for the Commission to present to
council which include: suggest overnight parking remain status quo; budgeting for more police
enforcement; BART input meetings; and list of RTCP requests awaiting funding. vice chair
Evans will be absent from this meeting.
4.2.4 Request for Height Limit Parking on Occidental Avenue at Bellevue Avenue
Mr. Erbacher will send a letter to the petitioner advising that this site belongs to County of San
Mateo. AIso, the problem of sight distance is a Hillsborough issue.
The CW of Bu,lingane Pags 3
6
7
TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2002
4.2.5 Request for Height Limit Parking at 1864 Rollins Road
Mr. Erbacher will send a letter to the petitioner advising that the business whose trucks were parking
there are now gone so the problem has been eliminated.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS.
5. 1 Request for Speed Bump on Hillside Drive at Carlos Avenue
Mr. Chou state.d that speed studies show critical speed is high with the 85%-ile at 37 mph. From the
floor, Mr. Zinman stated there is no speed control near this site and since it's a shaight-away, cars race
down the hill; so he is requesting a speed bump to slow the traffic, especially since there is a speed bump
farther up in the county area of Hillside Drive. Vice Chair Evans stated that there are no speed bumps
within the city limits since the City does not favor them. This will be a discussion item next month as a
request to review speed concems.
FROM THE FLOOR.
INFORMATION ITEMS.
7.1.1 Traffic Engineer's Report
Mr. Chou advised that the traffic signal work at California Drive and Carmelita Avenue at
California Drive and Carmelita Avenue and the pedestrian signal at Morrell Avenue is in
progress. The controllers were being tested and they are now ready for installation on September
196 and will be on-line on September 246. After being on red flash for two days, the signals will
be operational and will be fine-tuned for synchronization. Sgt. Cufler advised that the police will
be present to monitor the traffic.
Also, there are plans to install illuminated crosswalks on California Drive at Iorton Avenue with
a pedestrian-activated signal.
7. 1.2 Staff Action I-og - Attached.
7.1.3 Burlingame Parking Snrdy
Mr. Chou advised that he met with the consultant to discuss zubmittal of a Scope of Work to
include the second phase of this study which will be on the feasibility of further parking meter
increases and to redo the parking study showing a comparison of results to the original study.
The study, to start in October, will be presented to this Commission for review. Vice Chair Evans
suggested that the public attend to provide their input. Comm. Cohen confirmed that part of the
study will be a review of behavioral changes since the free lots were opened.
7.1 From Staff to Commission
The City of Budi,]gdt,€Page 4
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING GOMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2OO2
7.2 From Commission to Staff
7.2. I Reports of citizen complaints or requests
Comm. Cohen reported that when turning right on Broadway from Iaguna Avenue, northbound,
the new bulbout seems excessive and cars must cross over the centerline to complete the turn.
Mr. Erbacher stated he will advise the streetscape project manager.
7 .2.2 Comments and communication - None.
7.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday, October 10,2W2 meeting
Comm. DeAngelis and Sgt. Cutler will be absent for this meeting.
8. INACTIVE ITEMS.
8. I Request for traffic control on Dwight Road
Mr. Erbacher advised that the bid is $51,300 for this project. The Gas Tax Fund will pay for curb and
gutter and median work, and the General Fund will pay for construction of the four walls. This is the
first traffic calrning project in Burlingame.
8.2 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffrc study of area to determine if
trafhc-calrning measures warranted
This item is on hold for the Traffic Calming Program. Cornrn. De Angelis suggested noticing the
petitioners of the lack of funds for the RTCP. Mr. Erbacher advised that he will notice the petitioners
after Council reviews available funding status. Sgtr. Cutler submitted the Seleaive Enforcement Report
which shows 19 citations issued.
This item is on hold for the TrafEc Calming Program. Cornm. De Angelis suggested noticing these
petitioners also of the lack of funds for the RTCP. Mr. Erbacher advised that he will notice the
petitioners after Council reviews available funding status.
8.4 Request for speed limit and auck weight limit enforcement, a traffic sigaal on Trousdale Drive
at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at I,oyola Drive and STOP sign on Trousdale
at Quesada Way. Results of Traffic Data Gathering - Speed limits
Sgt. Cutler submitted the Selective Enforcement Report which shows 36 citations issued, 14 were for
speed violation.
The CW of Bufingame Page 5
8.3 1007 Chula Vista Avenue - Letter requesting Speed Limit Signage for Traffic-Catning effect to
constrain speeding drivers
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Unapproved
Thursday, September 12, 2002
8.5 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail)
This item is on hold for the Traffic Calming Program. Comm. De Angelis also suggested noticing
these petitioners of the lack of funds for the RTCP. Mr. Erbacher advised that he will notice the
petitioners after Council reviews available funding status.
8.6 1300 Block of Vancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition)
This item is on hold for the Traffic Calming Program. Comm. De Angelis suggested noticing the
petitioners of the lack of funds for the RTCP. Mr. Erbacher advised that he will notice the petitioners
after Council reviews available funding status.
9. AGENDIZE FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
4.1.2 Discussion Item
4.2.1 Discussion Item
5.1 Discussion Item
10. ADJOURNMENT. 8:40 p.m.
The City of Budingame Page 6
MEETING MII{UTES
Burlingame Parlis & Recreation Commission
Thursday, September 19, 2002
The regular meeting of the Bwlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Ed Larios at7:02 p.m. in Conference Room "A" at Burlingame City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:Dithnan, Heathcote, Kahn, Larios, Lawson, Mnderman, Muller;
Youth Commissioner Warden
Commissioners Absent:
StaffPresent:
Others Present:
Erickson
Parks & Recreation Director Schrvartz
None
MINUTES
Minutes of the July 18, 2002 reg:iar meeting of the Commission were approved as submitted.
OLD BUSINESS
A Cqmmunitv Center & Temporarv Teen Center Update Director Schwartz updated
the conunissioners on the progress of the Temporary Teen Center. At the Septernber rc.ZOAZ
meeting, the City Council directed staffto enter into negotiations to lease theproperty at783
Califomia Drive. Chairman Larios talked about the program uses of the facility.
-schwartz
stated that negotiations will be held within the next week and will be presentedto the City
Council in October.
Schwartz explained funding options for the facility, involving subleasing a portion of the facitity
to a private vendor, leasing the Depot, reallocating Capital Improvemeni funds or increasing
fees. Commission Muller cautioned against increasing fees, pointing out the fine line of
charging for services already paid for through their taxes. Commissioner Heathcote noted that a
newspaper article cited a Council member as referring to the ptarured long-term facility as a Teen
Center rather than a Community Center.
B. Youth Advisorv Committee fYAC) Report Youth Advisory Commissioner Warden
reporled: (l) the YAC will conduct a dance on Septeinber 20e, (2) the YAC has held their first
meeting of the school year and Lauren Harber was elected President for a second term, (3) a teen
concert will be held in Washington Park. on Saturday, September 28e and (4) youth in
Governrnent Day will be held on October 21't. Director Schwartz said that infonnation about the
second Parks & Recreation Youth Commissioner rvill be rnade available at Youth in Govemrnent
Day and applications wili be brought to the November meeting.
9 Senior Resourees Handbook Comraissioner Dittman presented a sample of the neu,
fonnat she has developed for the handbook. Commissioner Kahn discussed the distribution
points. Dittrnan reported that the handbook should be ready for copying b5r the october meeting.
(
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, September 19, 2AO2 - prge 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comfilents from the pubtc.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Commissioners Muller and Dithnan told staffthat many individuals have been either on
the flreld or on the inside lanes of the track at Burlingame High School during adult soccer
games. Their concem is for the safety of the individuals who are either watching the soccer
[u-.r or participating in unscheduled track practices. Staff stated that the game offrcials should
6e moving these individuals and that staff should be notified of repeat occrrrrences. If this
continues,-those individuals will be asked to observe from the stands, practice their track in a
safer area or leave the facility.
REPORTS
A. Citv's Financial tatus - Director Schwartz presented a Por'r'erpoint presentation
outlining the Ciry's 2001 -02 financial suuunary, reductions made to the budget, current
financial status, a four-Pronged budget strategy being implernented City-wide. In
response to questions, Schwartz also stated that, at this time,no programs will be cut for
budgetary reasons. Staff wilL also continue to
service programs for teens and senior citizens.
look for new programs, especiallY hurnan
Parks and Recreation Division Report
In addition to the uttuch"d report, Schwartz read portions of a letter from the Cit-v
Manager to Mr. and Mrs. Uaritr of 1569 Newlands Avenue. The letter states that the
parks and Recreation Commission will review the matter of the Avon Walk fundraiser
using Pershing Park as a rest area and will develop a recommendation for the City
Councit. Schwartz indicated that the event organizers will probably approach the City in
early Spring for a permit and the item will be placed on the Commission's agenda at that
time.
B.
C Commissioners
1. Co*"*sioner Kahn said that she recently took the Itatian class at the Recreation
Center and that the instructor was fabulous.
Z. Commissioner Dittman requested the area surrounding the Washington Park
playground equipment be washed down.
3. -Ct uir*uo faiios commented that the grass at the Dog Park is not in good
condition. Schwartz responded that staff has checked '*.ith many other cities that
have dog parks and none have been successful in growing or maintaining grass.
4. Kahn stated that the pathrvay to, and the area around, the restroorn at Bayside
park Field #l arc verydark. Staff will check to rnake sure that the lighting system
works and the timer is properly set.
5 Larios mentioned that two seats on the Comrnission expire in October. The trvo
commissioners, Lawson and Erickson, will be contacted by the City Manager's
office and wi1lbe invited to an interview with two CrS Council members, if they
are interested in staying on the Cornmission.
Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, September 19,20A2 - page 3
D. Recreation Division Revenue Report - See attached.
NEXT MEETING
The next regular meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission will be held on Thursday,
October 17,2002 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjoumed at
8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Randy Schwartz
Director of Parks & Recreation
City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept.
850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
phone: (650) 558-7300 ' fax: (650) 696-7216
recreation@burlingame. or g
MEMORANDUM
Date: Septernber 12,2002
To: Parks & Recreation Commissioners
City Council
From: Director ofParks & Recreation
Re: Monthly Report
Parks Division
tt .twarded 2002-'03 Tree Pruning Contract (Timbedine Tree Service was the low bidde$.
Z) Dutch EIm Disease - City Tree Crew has removed five infected ehn trees. There will be additional
removals in the coming year.
3) Ballfietd Maintenance Seminar - Two Parks Division e.urployees attended in Haytvard.
4) q/a5hington Park grass infield aerated and treated with Turface to improve water penetation.
5) Ilosted San Mateo Counfy Employees two day softbatl tournament at Bayside Parli, August 17,
18.
6) Soccer fields lined for season opetrers.
Recreation Division
1) Teeus - First overnight camping trip includedzz parncrpants. 54 teens participated in the last two
weeks of Adventure Seekers, including 27 for an overnight held at Washington Park.
2) Youth - Summer Basketball fini shed with 34 1 participants and a pool party for players and coaches.
Summer Recreation Camps concluded with 371 in Young Explorers, 312 nDiscovery Days. Hosted
ASA Girls 14U "A" Fastpitch Regional Championships in July - bringing hotel and lour"ism reverute
to Burlingame from the 12 teams and theirfamilies.
3) Seniors - Trips included the San Francisco Giants and the Berkley Secret Garden with 30 each rip.
Emeritus Lectures hosted 20 for a lecture on sleep and25 for hypnosis.
4) Sports Camps - The new MLS Soccer Camp drew 130 children. Skyhaw-ks programs (soccer, mini-
hawks & jr. soccer) increased 42o/o (120 children) over last sunmer.
5) Aquatics - Participation in aquatics prograum increased 221 (+17.9o7r) &om last sumurer. New
programs included Adult Stroke Clinic and Family Dive-in Movie. In satisfaction surveys from swirn
lesson, 95% of customers rated us as good or better.
6) Adult Sports - 35+ Drop-in Soccer averages 45-6A participants each week.
7) Preschool - Pre-registration for the school year took place in July with all classes filling in the first
evening of registration. Waiting lists rvill be used to filI any vacancies that occur.
S) grrmmarf 16p grrmmer Quarter - Total summer session enrolhnents: 8,1 I 1 (+512 or 6.8% from
7,596 enrolhnents in $unmer, 2001)
LTpcoming activities:
Con:munity Golf Tourna:nent - September 27
City Opeu House - October 5
Youth in Govemment Dav - October 21
Holiday Tree Lighting - December 6
Holiday Faire - Decernber 7
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
September 23,2002
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Keighran called the September 23, 2002, regular meeting of the
Planning Commission to order at7:04 p.m.
il. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele,
Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Erika Lewit; City
Attomey, Larry Anderson; City Engineer, Phil Monoghan
III.. MINUTES Chair Keighrran asked if there were any changes to the unappro.,,od minutes.
Commissioner noted changes to Item 8,1537 Drake Avenue: page 8 vice
Chair Bojuds chaired the meeting,first line second paragraph;page9, second
paragraph, line 13 delete " ' and insert')ersr
because a project does not require a variance does not meanwe suspend
judgment as planners "; and s:rme paragraph line 10 add following "on three
lots... or a modest house on the third. There were no other changes
proposed. The minutes were approved as amended.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Don Corey, 833 Alpine, there is a problem with the Public Address system,
cannot hear some Commissioners; came to complain about the house you
approved next door to a properfy I own at728-730 Laurel, this is a 3800 SF,
two story house, size is out of place in the neighborhood, was not noticed of
project; had to give up one foot of my property so that the developer could
have a 10 foot wide driveway; should be as concerned about big duplexes as
you are about monster houses on the west side.
Dan Anderson, 728 vemon, congratulate the commission on its diligent work
on Safeway, disappointed in Safeway they are not looking at Burlingame as
unique; want a building that fits Burlingame. There were no further
comments from the floor.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
380 LANG ROAD - ZONED O.M. APPLICATION FOR A SIGN VARTANCE FOR SIGN AREA AND
HEIGHT ON A SECONDARY FRONTAGE (DANIELA PANEBIANCO, APPLICANT; ELZABETH
HAMMACK.) PROJECT PLANNER:O'ROURKE
I
cP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked:o Provide data on signs on surrounding properties, height and size;o Provide information on the height of the letters on both proposed signs;
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
o Would there still be a sign variance if the primary frontage of the site were that side facing US 101;
. Why is the sign so large, with so much information on it (web site, phone number), appears like a
billboard, could be lloh to l5Yo smaller and still be visible from the freeway;
o Does the commission have the authority to change the primary frontage designation; and
o How large is the Scuba Lessons sign? Does it meet our signage requirements now?
Since there were no further comments Chair Keighran set this item on the regular action calendarwhen all the
questions had been addressed and staffhas had a chance to review them and prepare a staffreport. This item
concluded at7:17 p.m.
2.301 ATRPORT BOULEVARD/3s0 BEACH ROAD - ZONED C-4 - (GLENBOROUGH PARTNERS,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER)
APPLICATION FOR A LOT LINE ADruSTMENT TO CREATE A SEPARATE I8,OOO SF
PARCEL AT 350 BEACH ROAD. PROJECT ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG
APPLICATION FOR REZONING FROM C-4 TI, J-M FOR THE I8,OOO SF PARCEL AT 350
BEACH ROAD PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked:
o Will the rezoning proposed still allow a daycare center on the 350 Beach Road site;
o Is the parking requirement different for a daycare center in C-4 as opposed to O-M; and
o Is this proposal spot zoning.
Since there were no further comments, Chair Keighran set this item for the regular action calendar by the
Planning Commission when all the information has been submitted . This item concluded at 7:23 p.m.
YII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Itums on the consent calendar qre considered to be routine. Thqt are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt. _
There were no items on the consent calendar.
YI[. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER PERSONAL SERVICES QUALIFY AS RETAIL SALES AT
HEALTH AND BEAUTY SPAS (KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ, APPLICANT;LOEZ AND LOUISA KAO,
PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: MEG MONROE
Reference staff report September 23,2002, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Commissioners questions: have any conditional use permits for Health and
Beauty Spas been requested? CP noted none. What was the recommendation regarding class size when this
was reviewed before? CP noted that the code defines classes associated with a retail use as three or more
people, such classes require a conditional use permit in Subarea A; the purpose of a conditional use permit is
so that the class use can be carefully regulated to have the least impact on parking in the area.
A.
B.
3.
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes Septanber 23, 2002
Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Jay and Karen Scheikowitz, spoke in support of the change,
noting she provides a community service, had the impression that the Planning Commission indicated that
when they stayed the code enforcement for 6 months that you would find a way for this fitness use to stay
and still not allow a gymnasium use at this location. Did not understand that one-on-one and one on two
training was excluded from inclusion in retail sales for calculating the gross revenue from this use for
compliance with current definition; now know that basement level will not support 25%o of gross from retail
sales; this is not a sweaty gym, customers do not stay all day, they do not come without appointments; have
been at this location for4 years would like to have closure; 95o/oof clients live in Burlingame,S}%owalk or
take the train; business is active before 1 0 a.m. and after 6 p.*.; we are prepared to eliminate group training ,
room is small and maximum number we can have in a group is 6 anyway, groups just make activity
affordable to more people.
Commissioners asked: when I visited the site there was a client there exercising by themselves, how often
does that occur; about one-half of one percent ofthe customers work out by themselves. What percentage of
your gross is sale of hard equipment and apparel; less than 2o/o,people do not want to spend $ 1500 to $ 1800
for equipment. Is all the instruction done by appointment; ,in 55 minute lnstruction hours. Are there more
than 3 people on site at one time; yes average 2 instructors with three clients, after 6 p.m. average three
instructors and 5 clients ; between I I a.m. and 6 p.m. hardly any people, so quiet don't have a receptionist.
There were no further comments or questions from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner comment: sounds as if this decision revolves around semantics and understanding what
constitutes a class; like to see business thrive, change definition so that just one-on-one and one on two
which can be a personal service, can't seem to make retail sales work; could count one-on-one and one on
two personal service as part of the required 25o/o retail sales activity; have a predicament crafting code in
terms to accommodate continuation of a given business, present code is clear to operate at this location need
25o/o of gtoss revenue from taxable retail sales, to create an exception is contrary to expressed terms of the
city code. Does other businesses have 25%6 retail sales requirement; CP Monroe, yes Graphic Arts and
Design Retail Business, where the retail was required to differentiate these businesses from an office use and
allow in the "pedestrian oriented" Subarea B. Can applicant buy parking, as a retail business this business is
nonconforming in parking (replaces a previous retail business) so is not required to provide parking on-site.
Processing choices? CA noted can determine personal service activity equals retail ta:<able sales; amend the
code to drop the 25o/o retail sales requirement; change codei in some way se thatT 5o/oof the activity on site is
retail sales and personal service (one-on-one and one on two); or limit to one-on-one and one on two and
address group activity separately.
Commission discussion continued: could it be regulated based on headcount? Applicant said that goup
haining was not needed, if they do not have more than one or two people per trainer it will reduce the
parking problem and75%o of the business could be retail sales and personal service; could change the
definition of Health and Beauty Spa to a personal service use. There are no basements in the Broadway
Commercial area so where is this use allowed now; CP noted in Broadway is allowed on the first and second
floors. If eliminate groups will cut a lot of people off from access to this activity, could goup activity be
limited to l0o/o of gross; how would group size be monitored; difficult to monitor and there is a parking
issue in this area.
C. Boju6s moved to direct staff to modiff the code definition of Health and Beauty Spa as a personal service
use with a maximum of two customers per personal trainer, that the personal service would be included with
retail sales, and that there would be no goup instruction allowed with the use. The motion was seconded by
Chair Keighran.
3
4.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes Septernber 23, 2002
CA noted that staff would redraft the ordinance and bring it back to the commission, at which time there
could be more discussion.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to direct staff to revise the code definition of Health
and Beauty Spa to call it a personal service with no group instruction allowed. The motion passed on a 7-0
voice vote. This item concluded at 8:55 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
1537 DRAKE AVENUE ZONED R-I _ APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATryE
DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGENCE OF THREE PARCELS,
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ONE ATTACHED GARAGE AND DESIGN REVMW TO CONSTRUCT TWO
NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, (OTTO MILLE& APPLICANT AND PROPERTY
OWNER; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (60 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 9. 2OO2\
Chair Keighran noted that there were several letters regarding this project that were before the
Commissioners as desk items. She also noted that she lives within 500 feet of the proposed project site and
recused herself from this deliberation. She stepped down from the dais.
Vice-Chair Boju6s took the gavel. Planner Lewit briefly presented the project description, noting this was
continued design review study item. Commission asked staff: can applicant provide a table to show FAR
relative to lot size, particularly for the larger houses on the block, such as 1540 Drake; wasn't this project
already referred to a design review consultant; did the applicant provide all of the information that the
Commission requested at the September 9, 2002 meeting? Staffresponded that the requested table would be
included in the next staff report; the previous application for three houses went to a single meeting with a
design review consultant and then the application was withdrawn; and the applicant has provided all of the
requested information and it is included in the staff report.
Vice-Chair Bojues opened the public comment. Mark Hudak, 216ParkRoad, was present to address the
Commission on behalf of the owner. He made the following points about the project: the mitigated negative
declaration prepared by staff indicates that there are not any significant environmental impacts involved with
the proposed project; the information gathered by the applicant from DataQuick for the houses in the
neighborhood tlpically does not include the floor area for garages, where this floor area is included in
calculations made by the City; an overhead projection sheet was submitted to show that there are
approximately 6 houses in the immediate neighborhood that, when the floor area is adjusted for garage
space, match or exceed the floor area and the number of bedrooms for the two proposed houses; and feel
that if the Commission's concerns are with the size of the house and not with the designs, then referring this
project to a design review consultant is not appropriate.
Dave Taylor,1566 Drake Avenue; Janice Ochse, 1512 Drake; Chris McCrum, 1540 Drake; Ann Thomas,
1520 Drake; Janet Garcia, 1561 Drake; Bob Bear, 1510 Drake; Steve Fong, 1001 Cabrillo Avenue spoke
concerning this project: why has Chair Keighran recused herself from voting on the project; all ofthe larger
houses shown in the information submitted by the applicant are on larger lots, not on 6000 SF lots like the
proposed houses; I 5 09 Drake appears to have many non-conforming structures and elements on the property
and should not be used as an example for other houses being built in the neighborhood; feel the mitigated
negative declaration does not adequately address the parking impacts to the street because of the additional
curb cuts and causing a loss of street parking; mitigated negative declaration seems inconsistent regarding
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
the protection of the Redwood trees and the proposed mitigation measures are not strong enough; iftwo lots
and two houses were proposed instead of three, there would be a better fit with the fabric of the
neighborhood; current proposal is a step backward because now the neighbors will have to deal with t'wo
stages of construction, one construction period for the two houses proposed now and another construction
period when the third lot is developed; many of the issues raised by the design review consultant for the
original proposal of three.houses were never addressedbythe applicant; feel the currentproposal should also
be referred to a consultant and should include a house on the third lot; the two proposed homes are not
consistent with the masses of the existing homes in the neighborhood; the new plumbing for the homes will
create an added burden on the problematic sewer system in the neighborhood, Mills Creek is presently
contaminated due to sewer back-ups on Bernal Avenue; neighbors are willing to pay for independent studies
ofthe sewer and Redwood trees to insure that unbiased and accurate information is obtained; this is amulti-
unit development that is threatening the character of Burlingame; three new houses built to the maximum
FAR allowed does not fit into the fabric of the neighborhood; and multi-unit developments should be held to
a higher standard because of the impact they have on a neighborhood.
CA Anderson noteC that Chalr Keighran's decision to recuse herself from deliberations and voting on the
project was the result of regulations in the Fair Political Practices Act, City staff supports her decision, and
members of the audience should contact the Fair Political Practices Commission if they have additional
questions. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: the Commission has a duty to protect the character of the town, but must balance
this with progress, with the protection of private property rights, with providing viable housing stock in the
community; legally there are three build-able lots in the proposal and it is not realistic to think that only two
houses will be built; concerns expressed that the tree protection measures are not strong enough, think
neighbors' idea to retain an independent arborist to study the Redwood trees and an engineer to study the
sewer issue is a good one; would like record to show that there are 20 plus citizens of Burlingame in the
audience this evening to provide input about the two multi-unit developments proposedbyMr. Otto Miller at
1537 Drake and 1036 Cabrillo Avenues; the applicant has provided the required information and feel that the
Commission has the tools to make a decision, would support taking this item to an action hearing; concem
with referring this project to design review consultant when Lot 11 has a "stealth" home on it; how will
consultant be able to look at the project as a whole without the third home; the Commission is working with
a certain set of ruics i.o govern development and the applicant has complied with those rules, the proposed
houses do not require any exceptions to the code; do not feel this property owner should be subject to
different rules from surrounding owners, any ofwhom could choose to build their properfy to the maximum
allowable FAR at any time in the future; feel that the environmental document adequately addresses the
sewer and tree issues; have discussed with the City Engineer the impact of the proposed houses on the sewer
system and it is the Engineer's professional opinion that the impact will be negligible; Burlingame is an
evolving town, new houses and additions to existing houses are a part of the fabric of the town and its
history; and we must judge the current application by the rules and regulations in place at this time, the
current application meets all the regulations.
Continued Commission discussion resulted in the following concerns about the design of the project:
. believe that houses in current proposal are simply too big to be supported by the neighborhood;
o the proposed houses should reflect the existing sizes exhibited in the neighborhood so that theywill
into the neighborhood;
o designer should consider mix of FARs, architectural styles, garage pattern, and setbacks for the
proposed houses;
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
o do not believe the neighborhood can support three homes built to the maximum allowable FAR;o review by design consultant should assume the development of a third house on Lot 11;o mass and bulk are just as important as the maximum FAR; ando the issues for design review consultant are not to tweak the architectural elements, but to reduce the
size of the houses and to provide variety in design.
C. Vistica made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion
was seconded by C. Keele.
Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the project to a design review consultant. The
motion passed on a voice vote 4-2-l (Cers. Auran and Osterling dissenting, Chair Keighran abstaining). The
Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at9:27 p.m.
Chair Keighran returned to the dais and called for a five-minute recess at9:27 p.m.
Recess ended at9:37 p.m.
1036 CABRILLO AVENUE _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW
TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACIIED GARAGEAND FRONT SEBTACK
VARIANCE (OTTO MILLER, APPLICANT; EUGENE AND MAUREEN SUPANICH, PROPERTY
OWNERS; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., NC., DESIGNER) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: SEANO (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 9.
Planner Lewit brieflypresented the project description. Commission asked of staff: has the City Engineer
reviewed the soils report; what is the significance of the 7 foot mark above the creek; is the existing retaining
wall sufficient for bank protection? Staff noted that these items would be addressed by staff or by the
applicant in the next staff report.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Mark Hudak, 216ParkRoad, representing the owner, and
James Chu, designer, were present to answer questions. Mr. Hudak noted that the variance for the front
setback for the porch was mentioned as a possible solution by some members of the Commission at the last
hearing to provide interest at the front elevation, the porch can be removed, but a variance maybe justified
on the lot bythe presence of the creek; designerhas made several design changes in an effort to connect the
house better with the creek setting; and the method of construction will include a pier and grade foundation,
which is preferred for minimal impact to the creek. Commission noted that Sheet A.4 shows cross-hatching
that is not labeled and Sheet A.3 does not have cross-hatching for the deck located off the breakfast nook.
Mr. Chu replied that these items would be revised in the next set of plans. Commission asked for further
clarification regarding the ownership of the property. Mr. Hudak responded that presently the properties at
1032 and 1036 Cabrillo Avenue are owned by Eugene and Maureen Supanich, that Otto Miller has a lease on
both properties with an option to buy, and that this option expires in 2003. Mr. Miller is currently subleasing
the existing house at 1032 Cabrillo Avenue to a tenant that has expressed an interest in buying the property.
It is not know whether the tenant, if he purchased the property, would keep the existing house.
Sandra Yee, 1800 Carmelita Avenue; Vitus Viskanta, 1704 Sanchez Avenue; Dan Griffen, 1015 Cabrillo
Avenue; Steve Fong, 1001 Cabrillo, Dave Taylor, 1566 Drake Avenue, and Garret Smith, neighbor, spoke
with concerns about the project: do not believe that the owner has any intention of keeping the existing
house, the result will be a multi-unit project, like the development at 1537 Drake Avenue, but staggered over
time; have concerns with traffic on the street and the protection of the Redwood trees along the creek; the
6
City af Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
proposed house does not fit into the neighborhood, the style only matches the existing corner house at 1032
Cabrillo, which may not be there in 5 years; the rest of the neighborhood is Craftsman in character with
smaller-scale homes, the proposed house would stick out like a sore thumb; the proposed house size does not
fit the creek lot, it is crammed off to one side of the lot and not integrated with the creek; the lot is 12,000 SF
but because of the creek only about 6000 SF is build-able; and the foundation of house will be close to
Redwoods, which have shallow roots, and an arborist report should be required to ensure that the health of
the trees is maintained during and after construction. There were no other comments from the floor and the
public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion identified the following concerns about the project:
o this creek lot is unique and the proposed house does not take advantage of the natural setting;
. a split level floor plan, a wrap-around porch, and other design options are available to connect the
house to the creek setting and make the house less massive and to reduce the impact of the house on
the street;
o there is an upstairs deck proposed on the house that looks out on a telephone pole, where it could be
re-located to the other side to have a view of the Redwoods;
. concern over the front setback variance, this a large lot and house is starting from scratch, where is
the justification for a variance;
o the porch should be retained, but look into decreasing the length of the house to eliminate the front
setback variance and also keep a sizeable backyard;
. feel the site supports a house of the proposed size, but as currently designed the house is too massive
and bulky;
o concern with the impact of the construction on the Redwood trees and the creek;
o designer should look into shifting the center of gravity of the house to the South and reducing the left
elevation so that there will be less visual impact if the existing house at 1032 Cabrillo were
demolished at some point in the future; and
o it is important to have early review of impacts to Redwoods and the creek, would like to see an
initial study for environmental review prepared by staff with the appropriate studies submitted by the
applicant.
..C. Brownrigg made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made.and.riirected
staff to prepare an initial study for the project, with particular attention given to the protection ofthe existing
Redwood trees and impact of construction on the creek. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Comment on motion: strong interest in having the owner, tenant, and Mr. Miller attend the next hearing and
speak to the Commission and the community about the project; and what is the time line for both design
review and environmental review?
CP Monroe note that the design review and initial study can proceed in parallel.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to prepare and initial study and to refer this item to a design
review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:40 p.m.
7
6.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 2j, 2002
121 CRESCENT AVENUE _ ZONED R.l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A LOWER FLOOR, FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION (JOE AND LISA LARRATT, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERS; ANA
BALAREZO, INGLESE ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT) (52 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
CATHERINE KEYLON
Planner Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Mark Inglese, architect, was present to answer questions about
the project. He noted that the existing porte cochere would be retained to add character to an otherwise
uninteresting elevation at the front; one of the goals of the proposed design is to give the house articulation
that it is currently lacking; Pittosporum shrubs will be planted in the rear yard to screen the addition.
Commissioner asked for reasoning behind different style windows, three different exterior materials, and the
nzurow clear storywindows along the left elevation. Architect responded that the mixed window types and
exterior materials were traditional for Craftsman architecture and added variety to the existing house and
proposed addition. The narrow windows along the left elevarion were to provide light.in the stairwell and
breakfast area without having a view of the neighbor's house and yard. There were no other comments from
the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioners noted that the front and rear elevations are nicely done, but the visual interest was not carried
to the side elevations. Commission had the following concerns about the project and asked the applicant to
address these items:
o would like to see centered design element on the second story of both side elevations to add interest,
such as a bay window or gable with the appropriate treatment;
. consider extending the shingles down towards the first floor on the side elevations to tie the two
floors together;
o the windows on the second story addition at the rear elevation look a bit crowded;
o provide more details about the garage door and materials of the garage; it will be a visible element
from the street and should be tied into the details of the house; and
. more large-scale shrubs or medium scale trees are needed on the property for screening of the
addition and can be added to the site plan.
C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the suggested
revisions have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at I l:04 p.m.
8
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
1320 CORTEZ AVEIYT]E _ ZONED R.l _ APPUCATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO-
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACIIED GARAGE (CON BROSNAN, APPLICANT
AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR., n{C., DESIGNER) (37 NOTICED)
PRO.TECT PI,ANNFR: S O'ROURKE
8.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. James Chu, designer, was present to answer questions. He
noted that this is a straightforward application for a house to be built by a developer on a singles lot; the
design is French chalet and does not require any exceptions to the code. There were no other comments
from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioners noted that the overall design of the house is a nice one. They had the following concerns
about the project and asked the applicant to address these items:
o the house is bulky; look into reducing the plate height on the first floor to 8 feet and seriously
consider eliminating some floor area to reduce the m*;s; =-o the two windows at the upper right side of the right elevation should be a split casement with a
mullion in the center;
o the porch appears massive, consider a larger opening or an element that would allow visibility
through the brick to lighten the mass;
o the half moon roof vents do not match the scale of the roof; the vents should be increased in size or
moved to the rear so they are not visible from the street;o there is a blank stucco wall along the left elevation that needs relief; consider adding a trellis or
landscaping at this elevation to fill the space; and
o the spruce in the front yard is a great asset and want to have an arborist's report showing how the tree
will be protected and maintained during demolition and construction, report should be approved by
the City Arborist.
C. Boju6s made a motion place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the requested
revisions have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on motion: proposed house is right at the maximuii, FAR allowed and some floor area should be
eliminated to address the massive appearance of the house.
Chair Keighran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 1 1:15 p.m.
512.516 PRIMROSE ROAD _ ZONED R-3 _ APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING,
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND VARIANCES FOR
FRONT SETBACK, PARKING IN THE SIDE SETBACK, AND FOR FRONT SETBACK
LANDSCAPING FOR AN EIGHT-I.INTT CONDOMINIUM. (DALE MEYER, DALE MEYER
ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT; AND DENHAM LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: ER LEWIT
City Planner Monroe briefly presented the project description noting that the purpose for tonight's review
was environmental scoping for this 8-unit residential condominium project. CP noted that it had come to
9
Planner Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 2j, 2002
staff s attention that buried in the mass of vegetation at the rear of these lots were possibly some protected
size trees, identification ofthe location and number ofthese trees and an arborist report on their condition as
well as appropriate action would be included in the environmental review for this project. Commissioner
asked if the city had any affordable housing requirement at this time. CP Monroe responded no, the Housing
Element Implementation Subcommittee was working on this issue at this time. There were no further
questions of staff.
Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Dale Meyer, architect, represented the project. He noted that
he wanted to clariff that the building at 5 16 Primrose presently contained four not three apartment units. He
also noted that they had discussed the trees in the rear of the two lots before they began the project and felt
that their condition was poor and removal would not be an issue; however, they would not object to
preparing an arborists report on them. They could remove the circular driveway and meet the front setback
landscaping requirement at the front of the building, but felt that off street loading/unloading area at this
location in this busy area across from City Hall would be valuable in reducing circulation impacts. The
guest parking in the side setback could be removed to increase landscaping but it would mean that the
garage would have to be re<lesigned, reducing the common open space at the rear of the project, presently
offering 2000 SF of common open space where 800 SF is required. The front setback variance is based on 4
properties, the two at the end are dropped because they are corner lots, so the two properties composing this
site are the basis for the average for the front setback. The 19'-6" setback is measured to the columns
supporting a balcony at the front, the rest of the fagade is22 feetback from the front property line.
Commissioners comments addressed environmental as well as design concerns as follows:
o the large street trees at the front will produce a lot of shade, check your proposed plantings to be sure
that they are shade loving.
o feel that the iron work balustrade chosen is not consistent with Burlingame, more ornate like New
Orleans, inappropriate across the street from city hall and the library.
o the rear common area is going to be uncomfortable for use because it will be in constant shade, have
you considered some other use than barbeque.
o Do not understand how at the rear the exiting stairs work with the patios, it looks as if there is a
conflict between tenant access from above to the coflrmon open space and the privacy in the master
bedrooms of the first floor units;
o A separate storage unit for each unit does not seem to be provided, some storage units shown are not
easily accessible.
o Reduce proposed height by lowering plate lines to 9 feet of at least those units with l0 foot floor to
floor.
o Are there any other front setbacks equal on interior lots in the area.
. Curved driveway is a good amenity at this location, front landscaping could be increased by taking
out guest parking in side setback andputting all guestparking in garage, since 2.5 spaces perunit, 3
or 4 spaces in the garage could be designated for guests with proper activating access provided from
each dwelling unit (placement of the calVaccess box will be important on this steep driveway).
o Should have one storage locker per unit in the basement, also bicycle racks should be provided for
resident's use.
. Confirm that gas meters can be inside the building, if not where would they be placed.
o On the rear elevation the iron on the balconies does not match, should be consistent with the rest of
the building.
o The three statues in the niches should not be identical.
. Niches are not necessary to design.
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23,2002
o Wrought iron is over done, solid comer pieces are heavy on thin balcony slab, address visual
heaviness.
o Not want garage bigger, address parking requirement below in space provided, put guest parking in
garage.
o Do not increase impervious surface on the lot.
o Gravel stop edge may not be possible on roof may need a parapet that would affect the height of the
building, check and redesign ifnecessary.
o The cornice is weak, parapet might help this.
o Fences on either side are important to the view from the street (see rendering of front of building)
their fence design should reflect the building design.
o Discouraging not to see any affordable housing component in this design.o For environmental analysis would like the following analyzed.:
o Sun analysis for the common open space;
o Landscaping at the front is important, can front setback variance be removed;
o Street trees need to be retained and protected, need to scale down such a large building;
o Setbackc are important, they reduce the visual impact, iddress parking in side setback;
o What plant material will the planters over the garage in the side yard area support, how will
they be designed, irrigation?
o No area for recycling is shown on the plans, add.
o Provide a photographic perspective or visual as we do for environmental documents from
the rotary in the street looking across the office building parking lot to address visual impact.
o Provide photos of existing buildings in the area showing their heights.
Commissioners noted that this is a new building with a lot of exceptions to the code, what are the hardships;
this building is very tall, all the others in the area are three stories, this is a prominent location across the
street from City Hall so development will have a big impact; how does this design fit the existing
neighborhood.
Chair Keighran noted that this item will be brought back to a studymeeting with the Planning Commission
when the environmental document is complete and commission's concems have been considered. This
scoping action is advisoly and not appealable. This item concluded atL2:00 a.m., midnight.
X. PLANNERREPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of September 16,2002
CP Monroe reviewed the City Council meeting briefly noting that the council upheld the
commission's action on the appeal of the determination of the second unit at 826 Alpine, failing to
find the unit was built before 1954. She also noted that among the correspondence at the
Commissioner's desk was the HCD certification letter for the 2001-2006 Housing Element.
Congratulations go to the commission, the community and city staff.
Next steps in processing project at 1450 Howard Avenue
Chair Keighran noted that she and C. Brownrigg had met with Councilman Coffey, CM Nantell, CA
Anderson and CP Monroe to discuss how to proceed with the processing of the Safeway project at
1450 Howard Avenue. They felt it would be beneficial for the Citizens for a Better Burlingame to
meet with Safeway, facilitated by John Glaser, to discuss their proposals and see what solution the
11
!
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2002
two parties could arrive at for a solution for the community; after that meeting the project would
move back to Planning Commission. It was noted that this was not a move to add time, its pqpose
was to facilitate consensus. Staff would contact both parties to see if the meeting can happen. CA
noted that the Mayor and Vice-Mayor support this approach. It was noted that direction was to
focus on good points of each proposal would work best; to move project for this discussion City
constraints can be placed in abeyance, so that if solution changes city guidelines, willing to consider
within reason. Commission endorsed this approach to processing the project. Staffwill contact the
parties.
FYI - grade and roof changes on DSR approval at21l5 Hale Drive
Concemed about the two major changes proposed with this change which affect the design,
particularlywhen taken together: elevate the building which affects approved height and changing
the roofing material from slate to composition shingle, which affects the design. The elevation ofthe
building, caused by not grading out the site, will change the roof as well as making 10% of the mass
of the building more visible; the commission should not have been enticed with a design element
like a slate roof if it was not to be installed. Commission agreed to place this item on the actioh
calendar at the next meeting. The item will be noticed for a public hearing.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Keighran adjourned the meeting at 12:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ralph Osterling, Secretary
LNAPPRovEDMINUTES 9.23.02
t2
l.
CITY OF BURLINGAME BAILDING INSPECTION
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY SEPTEMBER, 20n/2
<A.!,IE MO8!E----------B.s
r.Y.2002
TEIA YEA.R
F.Y.2001
I,AST YEAR
Permit tsl4)e
New Single Family
New Multi-Family
New Commercial
A1t'erat ions - Res
Alterat ions -NonRes
Demol it ion
Swimming Pool
sign Permits
FenceE
Reroof ing
Repairs
Window Repl-
Mi scel laneous
TOTALS
THIS MONTH
# VafuaEion
T YEAR
# Va]uat j.on
TO DA][E_
# Valuation
$2,083,
$3,827,
$2 ,57r,
$1,
TO DATE
# valuation
$L,zeo ,
DIFF
t
DIF
6L.
0
0
22
7
9
0
4
0
30
3
5
5
$705, 000
$o
$o
$877,0s0
$453, 100
$o
$o
$r-8, s00
$o
i379 ,43s
$s3. s00
$38 , s27
i72 , 4so
$o
$o
$o
iL,3O4,532
$s88, 000
$o
Cn11W
$s, 5oo
$o
$303,302
$3,000
;7r, s28
$70, 000
32
2t
236
25
683
46
3
5
0
0
76
23
25
0
10
87
5
15
24
000
$o
$o
111
090
725
$o
979
500
557
000
27L
413
000
$o
000
o29
950
000
$o
775
000
757
300
776
029
0
0
0
29
5
5
L
0
27
1
5
3
.0
.0
.0
.8-
.2-
.0
.0
.4
.0
.t
.3
.1-
E
100.
10.
9.
94.
$e4,
$1.
#t, o24,
$62,
$8e,
$re7 ,
$27 ,
$1,
$940,
$8,
$140,
1428,
242 .
50.
8.
647.
36.
53.
4
0
3
84
18
L7
0
4
1
70
3
16
23
$3 , 500,
$3 ,469,
s2,e36,
$30,
88 fi2,607,562 76 i2,34s,862 tr.2
1,o /oL/ 02 6 : 4L:32
272 $LO,O52,646 243 $1_2,872,6L6 2L.
Crime Cfassi fication.
Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter
Manslaughter by Negligence
Rape By Force
AEEempt to Commit. Forcible Rape
Robbery I'irearm
Robbery Knife
Robbery other Dangerous weapon
Robbery Strong-ArmAssault - Firearm
Assault - Knife
Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon
Assaul-t - Hands, !'ists, FeeE
Assault - Other ( Simple )Burglary - Forcibfe Entry
Burglary - Unlawful Entry
Burgl-ary - AEtempted Forcible Entry
I-,arceny Pocket -Picking
Larceny Purse-Snatching
Larceny Shoplifting
I-.,arceny From Motor Vehicle
Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories
I-.,arceny BicYcles
Larceny From Building
Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine
Larceny A11 Other
Motor Vehicle ThefE Auto
Motor Vehicle ThefE Bus
Motor Vehicle ThefE Other
SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES
FOR: AUGUST , 2002
PAGE:1
L.,as t
Current Year. .
AcE
YTD
Prev
Act
YTD...
L
0
5
0
I
1
2
4
1
9
11
3
l_
L
1
0
0
5
0
5
2
2
t1
1
2
18
7
7
37
51
L
0
0
13
5
3
2
1
t25
L37
61
2L
11
1,9
L57
59
4
2
15
4
L25
105
52
6
4
4
28
60
2A
8
,oo
7
2L
oo
1
1
2
2L
3
2t
l_
2L
5
4
L2
3
36
6
I
92
92
89 754 868
89 754 868
09-30-02
t-
A11 other Offenses
Animaf Abuse
Animal Nuisance
Arson
Assists Eo outside Agencies
Bicycle Violations
B igamy
Bomb Offense
Bornb Threat
Bribery
Check OffensesChild Neglect/proE custody
CompuEer Crime
Conspi racy
Credit Card offenses
Cruelty to Dependent Adult
Curfew and L.,oitering L.,aws
Death Investigation
Disorderly Conduct
Driver's License ViolaEions
Driving Under the Influence
Drug Abuse ViolaEions
Drug/Sex Registrants
Drunkenes s
Embezzlement
Escape
Extort ion
False Police Reports
Fal-se Reports of Emergency
Fish and Game Viol-ations
Forgery and Counterfeiting
!'ound Property
I,raud
Gambl ing
Harrassing Phone Ca11s
HiE and Run Accidents
Impersonat ion
I nce st
Indecent Exposure
Intimidating a Witness
Kidnapping
I-.,ewd ConducELiquor ]-Jav/s
I-,ittering/Dumping
Marijuana ViolaEions
Mental Health Cases
Missing Person
Missing Property
Munic j.pa1 Code Violat ions
Narcotics Sales/Manuf acture
of fenses Agal-nst Children
SWMARY OF PART TWO
REPORT FOR: AUGUST,
MONTHLY
CITY
OFF'ENSES
20 02
PAGE: 1
Crime CIassi fication.
Las t
Year..
Prev
ACT
YTD.Current
33
Act
YTD...
46
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
360
2
0
8
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
2
4
8
3
4
1
1
4
3
7
2
1
1
1
3
1
7
2
5
5
7
6I
4
10
2
9
l-
15
20
0
0
4
4
1
18
36
7
56
24
39
55
25
0
49
48
3
0
5
0
1
2
5
L
20
64
L9
74
36
0
13
l-0
20
0
1
'J"2
.'
4
48
3Z
9
59
z6
1
51
L7
0
0
0
L
0
L6
54
l6
0
44
24
1
0
9
0
0
0
6
0
78
23
L39
40
1
2
L2
2
t2
8
5
3
t4
2
8
6
0
43
4
0
0
0
1
0
1
3
09-30-02
09-30-02 PAGE: 2MONTHLY
CITY
SLIMMARY OF PART TWO
REPORT FOR: AUGUST,
OFFENSES
2002
Last
Year..
Act
YTD
Prev
Act
YTD.Crime Cl-assification
Other Assault,s
OtherJuvenile Offenses
Other Police Service
Pandering for immoral purposes
Parole Violations
Perj ury
Possession of Burglary Tool-s
Possession of drug paraphernalia
Possession of obscene literature;pj-cture
Probation Violations
Prostitution and Connmercial Vice
Prowllng
Resisting Arrest
Runaways (Under l-B)
Sex Offenses
Sex Offenses against Children
Sodomy
St.alklngStatutory Rape
Stolen Property; Buying; Receiving,' Possess
Suspended License
Tax Evasion
Temp Rest.raining OrdersTerrorist Threats
Towed Vehicle
TrespassingTruants/Incorrigible Juvs
US Mail Crimes
Vagrancy
Vandalism
Vehicle Code ViolationsViolation of Court Order
Warrants - Felony
Warrants - Misd
Weapons ; Carrying, Possessing
Welfare Fraud
Current
18
5
3
1
46
t_3 L25
1
1
10
I
L25
0
L23
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
z
2
2
0
5
6
0
1
0
2
45
0
4
47
0
2
0
1
0
0
7
0
B
5
0
8
2
0I
0
4
27
0
5
3
2
1_
1
3
1
I
l_
62
35
27
364I
0
0
0
185
36
l-5
5
3'7
11
0
42
22
423
4
4
0
0
r- 61
39
15
24
4
2
2
10
2
B
3
1
5
5
40
9
0
274 242 1,91_l 2,250
214 242 1, , 91-1, 2 ,250
10-0L-02
Crime Classification
Parking Citations
Moving Citations
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS
CITY REPORT
FOR: AUGUST, 2002
Current
Last
Year
PAGE: 1
Act
YTD...
Prev
Act
YTD.
3 ,606
247
2 ,851
290
24 ,572
1, 901
22 ,08'7
L ,'733
3 , 853 3 , LAL 25 ,4'/3 23 , B2o
3,853 3 ,L4L 26 ,4'73 23 ,820
Officer Productivity. . . .
Reported On: A11 Officers
Data Type Reported on: PARKING
BURLINGAI',IE
generated on L0/01/2002 at 03:462L4 PM
Report Range: 08/01/2002 to 0B/31/2AO2
valj.d
cnt
t Afl
valid
Voids
cnt
t AtI
void.s valid
t
Officer:ID
DAZA-QUIROZ
GARRETT
HARRISON
JFOX
KIRKPATRICK
MORAN
ROSCOE
634
501
506
505
502
201
503
529
1
111 9
115I
190
477
77
L4 .92
0. 03
31 .57
?, 61
s-36
L3.46
2 .00
98.69
100. 00
98.42
98.89
97.94
99 .17
98.61
1
0
18
t3
4
4
1
74
0
38
B9
00
30
66
51
5l-
13
27
I
I
2
TotaI 3545 41
Pag'e 1 of 1
k*n,
David A. Hankin
Vice President
Regulatory & Government
September 12,2002
Rahn Becker
Assistant City Manager
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Becker:
This letter serves to update you on RCN's construction progress in bringing our services to
Burlingame.
To date, we are providing cable television, high-speed modem, local and long distance services to
almost 1000 homes in the City. By the end of October 2002 we will be serving approximately 1300
additional homes.
ln the short time we have been serving your City, we are delighted that Burlingame residents are
receptive to trying the services of "the new kid on the block".
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
tla",it hb^,a-.-
David Hankin
1400 Fashion Island Blvd., Suite 100
San Mateo CA 94404
(6s0) 212-8010
Fax (650) 212-8009
STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AI\[D CITY COUNCIL
DATE: September2012002
F'RoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager
650-558-7222
suBJECr: PG&E Bankruptcy: Proposal f'or New Franchise
AGENDA
ACre{OI{LEDGUENTSITEM #
MTG.
DATE rolT l02
BY
BY
With City
RECOMMENDATION: This report is for your information only.
BACKGROUND: As you know, PG&E is in bankruptcy and has been working with the Court to arrive at a
methodology for emerging from the bankruptcy. This has been heavily covered in the media. Last June,
PG&E submitted to each city proposed franchise agreements with two new companies that the utility is
proposing as successors to the current franchise we hold with PG&E as a single entrty.
While PG&E submitted the documents with a calendar and recommendation to present these documents to
you, mumy cities felt that the franchises as proposed did not meet the interests of the cities. The current
franchise agreement is out of date and has been problematic to cities for a number of reasons. Since PG&E
was offering to change the franchise, this is an ideal opportunity for cities to raise their interests and negotiate
a more balanced franchise document. The issue, however, is clouded by the bankruptcy proceedings.
Most San Mateo County cities have taken the tact that the League of California Cities should take the lead in
working with PG&E, since so ruuly member cities are involved in this issue. The League has taken the lead
on this effort, and has formed a task force of member cities, including representatives, like Palo Alto, that have
extensive experience negotiating with PG&E. We feel this approach levels the playing field somewhat, since
most cities have an information deficit when it comes to undirstanding this r"ry.o*pl"x and politically
charged area.
PG&E staff called last week to express concern about the League's progress, and indicated that they were
going to begin calling city council mernbers, a strategy that we suggested was premature. I do not feel that the
League has been slow to respond; in fact they have had several very productive meetings that have led to a
statement of interests which they are now sharing with PG&E officials via a smaller negotiating team
established at the last conference.
I continue to feel it is premature for PG&E to approach city councils during active negotiations, and am
confident that the League will produce a model fianchise document in a timely fashion, albeit not according to
PG&E's unrealistic timetable. The League staffhas shared their frustrations with PG&E about the calendar
and their response, and has also shared our concern about approaching city councils at this point in the
deliberations.
I believe we should continue to support the League effort, and direct all PG&E inquiries to the League's
negotiating team. Also, the San Mateo County City Managers, working with the San Mateo County
Telecommunications Authority (SAMCAT), have established a group to pass on our local interests to the
negotiating committee. San Mateo County is represented on the negotiating committee. SAMCAT was
initially seen as a countywide organization that could lead a negotiating effort, but while it is helpful as a
communications tool, I have not approached the council with using this group formally for negotiations with
PG&E (a JPA amendment would be required) but do think it would be helpf,rl as an informal group. We will
continue to support the League's effort to develop a model franchise.
Having said all of this, there is no guarantee that the Court will support the outcome, and a different model
could be proposed by the Court, PG&E creditors, or the State Public Utilities Commission.
C: Frances Medema, League of California Cities
TO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
R-l
Following the City Council's denial of his request for determination that the second unit on his
prop.rtyiras buili before 1954, David Mani, the property owner atS26AlpineRoad, withdrew
i,is appeat for a rear setback variance. Council had set the rear setback appeal for October 21,
so that the determination on the second unit could be completed first.
As council may recall, the variance request far a2.5 foot rear setback where a 15 foot rear
setback is required, resulted from illegal construction in Mr. Mani's backyard. While applying
for retention of the second unit on the site, Mr. Mani obtained a demolition permit and began
removing the illegal construction.
With the finding that the second unit was not built before 1954 and the withdrawal of the
request for a variance, Mr. Mani must remove the illegal construction at the rear of the 1952
gatageand the kitchen within the room at the back of the garage. Since the rooT is attached to
Ih. horr., via the garage,he may use the area ofthe 1952 addition as non-sleeping living area
(family room, offiie, .rc.; *itttout a conditional use permit. However, the room may not be
used as a bedroom unlessthe Fire Department inspects and determines that there is proper fire
separation between the garage and the room addition'
City Council
Meg Monroe, City Planner
September 30,2002
Withdrawal of Appeal for a Rear Setback Variance at826 Alpine Road, Zone'd