Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2002.12.02BURLINGAME CITY COIJNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Monday, December 2,2002 Page I of 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 2, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO TIIE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular meeting of November 18,2002 5. CEREMONIAL a.Commendation awards to Burlingame Police Officers for their efforts in connection with the Wells Fargo Bank robbery and murder 6, PUBLIC HEAzuNGS The mayor may limit spakax n tfuw minutes each Public Hearing and approval of Resolution establishing 2003 assessments for San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District Adopt an Ordinance to rezone the property at 350 Beach Road from C-4 Waterfront Commercial to O-M Office Manufacturing Adopt an Ordinance to amend Title 18 to remove certain references to PEX and CVPC Adopt an Ordinance prohibiting the feeding of animals and birds on City property or other property without permission a. b c d. Determination whether public nuisance exists regarding accessory strucfure al107 Highland Avenue, Burlingame, CA 7 PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a "request to speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. Thc Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Terminate membership in San Mateo County Telecommunications Authority 8 a. CiA of Bwlingame CITY HALL.5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINCAME, CALIFORNIA %OIO (650) 55&7200 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Approval Presentation Hearing/Action Hearing/Action Hearing/Action Hearing/Action Hearing/Action Action BURLINGAME CITY COLINCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Monday, December 2,2002 Page 1 of3 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approve rotation list for offices of Mayor and Vice Mayor Status report on the FY2002-2003 Advanced Planning Program Resolution Approving License Agreement with METROPCS, Inc. for a telephone conduit installation within the Skyview water reservoir site, 1321 Skyview Drive Resolution awarding a contract to Control Manufacturing Company for Phase I of the citywide supervisory control and data acquisition system design/build integration project (SCADA) Resolution awarding contract to CSB Construction, Inc. to provide restroom modifications at Ray Park and Cuernavaca Park b. c d. 10. 11. t2. 13. f. Resolution establishing general fund reserves fbr 2002/03 g. Warrants & Payroll, October,2002 h. Appointment of Newsrack Committee Members i. Parks & Recreation Committee Vacancy j. Approval to schedule meeting for 2002 Year End Review of City Manage/s Performance COI.JNCIL COMMTTEE REPORTS OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSIMSS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees, October 15, 2002; Beautification, November 7,2002; Traffic, Safety & Parking, November 14,2002: Parks & Recreation, November 21, 2002: Planning, November 25, 2002 b. Department Reports: Building, October, 2002; Finance, CiA of Bwlingame CIfi HALL - 50I PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINCAME, CALJFORNIA 94OIO (650) 5s&7200 Approval City of Bwlingame BURLINGAME CITY COLINCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Monday, December 2,2W2 Page 1 of 3 14. October, 2002; Police, October, 2002 c. Letter from Youth and Family Assistance Agency conceming their reorganization d. Letters from Garbis Bezdjian and Broadway BID with City Planner reply conceming 1i99 Broadway CLOSED SESSION CITY HALL. 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLIN6AME, CALIFORNIA 94OIO (650) 55&7200 CITY HALL - 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINCAN,IE. CALIFORNIA %OIO (650) 5s&7200 * Threatened litigation pursuant to (Government Code section g 54956.9(bX1),(3XC)): Claim of Kevin Flynn BI'RLINGAME CITY COI.JNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Monday, December 2,2002 Page 3 of3 15. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities, please contact the City clerk at (650) 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy ofthe Agenda packet is available for public review ar the city clerk's office, city Hall, 501 primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www .org.Agendas and minutes iue available at this site. RCN subscribers may view the council meetings on channel 27. NEXT MEETING - January 6,2N3 CiA of Bwlngame BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of November 18,2002 1. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council chambers. The meeting was called to order at7:00 p.m. by Mayor Mary Janney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Chuck Mink. At this time, Reverend Paul Watermulder shared some spiritual thoughts with Council, staff and members in the audience. Mayor Janney acknowledged various delegates that were in attendance for the meeting. 3. ROLL CALL Council Present: Council Absent: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Janney, O'Mahony None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman Baylock made the following changes to the minutes of Novemb er 4'h,2002. page 2,item c, 1336 Carlos Avenue, requested the sentence to read "following his presentation and discussion ivith Councilmembers regarding the side setback,/loor area ratio, and.diclining height envelope and heightrequests." Same item, page 3, first paragraph "that thefloor area ratio variance needs n be reducid,; second paragraph, second sentence "and reduction ofthefloor area ratio yariance". Page7,should be hard work, not hard week. Vice Mayor Coffey made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 4,2002 Council meeting; seconded by Councilman Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. CEREMONIAL vice Mayor coffey was sworn in as Mayor by his brother, John coffey. Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes 1 November 18,2002 Mayor Coffey introduced his family to the members of the audience and reviewed the many accomplishments that were completed during Mayor Janney's tenure. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CANCEL DECEMBER 16. 2OO2 COUNCIL MEETING AND APRPOVE 2OO3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR CC Musso requested Council cancel the December 16, 2002 Council meeting and approve the 2003 City Council meeting calendar. Councilman Galligan made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Janney, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 8. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Coffey adjourned the meeting at7:24 p.m. after thanking the Burlingame Police Department for their exemplary work regarding the arrest in the wells Fargo burglary and murder. Respectfully submitted, Ann T. Musso City Clerk Burlingame City Council Unapproved Minutes2 November 18,2002 STAFF REPORT ro: HONORABLE MAYO AND CITY COUNCIL BY DATE: November 21r2002 FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager 650-558-7222 suBJECr: Public Hearing: Resolution Estabtishing 2003Assessments Business Improvement District BY AGENDA ITEM # 6A MTG. DATE t2-2-2002 San Mateo County Tourism RECOMMENDATION: A. Hold Public Hearing B. Adopt Resolution Establishing 2003 Assessments BACKGROUND: On October 7, Council adopted a resolution declaring the intention to impose assessments for 2003 within the district. This hearing is required for the council to consider all oral and written testirnony from interested persons. The city did not receive any protest regarding the proposed assessments. The proposed assessments, by city, are as follows: ClTY Belmont Burlingame Gounty of San Mateo Foster Gity Half Moon Bay Millbrae Redwood Gity San Bruno San Garlos San Mateo South San Francisco Annual Assessment Per RoomRooms 563 3,778 329 503 585 1,321 1,271 539 368 1,920 3,023 22,377.60 $ 672,343.20 $ 8,799.40 $ 92,772.00 $ 60,993.90 $ 196,916.40 $ 1 17,639.00 $ 35,758.80 $ 15,508.90 $ 225,928.00 $ 39.75 177.96 26.72 184.44 104.26 149.07 92.56 66.34 42.14 117.62 112.95 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $341,459.20 $ TOTAL 14,200 $ 1,790,395.30$ 126.09 ATTACHMENT: Resolution and Exhibits Showing Assessment Detail and Program Description c: Anne Leclair, San Mateo county convention and visitors Bureau RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING AND LEVYING YEAR 2OO3 ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVING DISTRICT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES F'OR THE YEAR 2OO3 WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District has been established for the purpose of promoting tourism in the District; and WHEREAS, the District Advisory Board has requested the Burlingame City Council to establish Year 2003 assessments for the District; and WHEREAS, on October 7,2002, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention (Resolution No. 108-2002) declaring its intention to impose assessments for the Year 2003 within the assessment District, and setting a public hearings on the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Streets & Highways Code, a public hearing on the proposed assessments was duly noticed for November 4, 2002, at7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the City of Burlingame, at the Council's Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing held at that place and time, the City Council received and considered all oral and written testimony from all interested persons, continued the public hearing to December 2,2002, at7 p.m. by resolution (Resolution No.120-2002) to provide additional notice, and the continued public hearing was duly noticed for that date and time; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing on December 2,2002, the City Council received and considered all oral and written testimony from all interested persons, and closed the public hearing, and WHEREAS, the City did not receive a majority protest pursuant to the Streets & Highways Code as to the assessments or to any program or activity proposed for the District; and WHEREAS, the proposed assessments appear reasonable and consistent with the ordinance establishing the District and the underlying State law, and the assessment basis is less than or equal to the assessment basis for the previous year and within the basis established in Ordinance No. 1648; and I WHEREAS, the proposed services, programs, and activities of the District are consistent with the ordinance establishing the District; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find as follows: l. Wriffen protests to assessments, improvements or activities were not received at those public hearings that constituted a majority as defined in Government Code sections 36500 and following. 2.The City Council does hereby levy an assessment for the Year 2003 on hotels in the District as described in City of Burlingame Ordinance Nos. 1648 and 1678 and to pay for services, programs, and activities of the District. 3. The types of services, programs, and activities to be funded by the levy of assessments on businesses in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference. 4. The basis for assessments for the Year 2003 on all hotels within the District are set forth in Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference. 5. The assessments for the Year 2003 on hotels within the District are set forth in Exhibit "C", incorporated by reference. 6. New businesses shall not be exempt from assessment as provided in Exhibit "A." MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City clerk of the city of Burlingame do hereby certit/ that the foregoing Resolution was of introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS: COLINCILMEMBERS: COLINCILMEMBERS: C :\FILES\Hotel B id\2003 assessment. res.wpd CITY CLERK 2002 Assessment Resolution2 EXHIBIT A ACTIVITIES, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Increased Generation of Group Leads a. Additional Sales Staff. Increase the Bureau's sales staff from two fulltimes sales representatives to six (6) or more. i. One sales representative to be located on the East Coast to represent the .. Pureau in the Washington, D.C. area; ll. Two sales representatives located in Sacramento; iii. One sales representative to be located in Southern California to represent the Bureau in the Los Angeles Area; iv. One sales representative in Chicago; v. Three sales representatives in-house. 2. Marketing Program for Meetings and Tourism a. Invest in extensive Web advertising, creating links from key travel sites; b. Host annual receptions in Sacramento; c. Add a cooperative advertising manager and create additional cooperative advertising pieces; d. Participate in additional trade shows of interest to member hotel properties; e. Enhance/update trade show booth decor and marketing materials; f. Increase memberships in organizationslattendance at meetings with key, potential target visitors; g. Enhance advertising in publications/web programs aimed at meeting planners; h. Create specialty guides/promotional pieces aimed attargetmarket segments (e.g. gol0; i. Conduct familiarizationtrips for meeting planners, film/adlcatalogue producers and travel writers; i. Use a part-time film commissioner to proactively recruit production crews to the area; k. Create additional collateral and marketing materials; 1. Add a part-time publications manager to write specialty pieces and articles for distribution; m. Add state-of the art software designed for convention and visitor bureaus; n. Enhance web site; 3. Program to Extend Stays a. Create collateral/promotional materials to encourage extended stays; b. Add a part-time manager of meeting services to create special packages/offers, marketing plans to encourage extended stays. 4. Consumer Reservations Program/Market to Travel Industry a. Sustain an on-line reservations system for travelers; b. Dedicate one new sales representative's time to the transient market; c. Develop an alliance with tour operators; d. Create an awareness of the Bureau on the part of international travelers;e. Have key brochures translated into German and Korean. EXHIBIT B ASSESSMENT BASIS FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY TOIIRISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR 2OO3 YEAR CATEGORY ZONE A - ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2OO3 ZONE B _ ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2OO3 Hotelwith full service and more than20 sleeping rooms $360 per sleeping room X 60%$360 per sleeping room X 50o% Hotel with limited service and more than 1000 square feet of meeting space and more than20 sleeping rooms $ 180 per sleeping room X 600Z $180 per sleeping room X 40%o Hotel with limited service and some meeting space but less than1000 square feet and more than20 sleeping rooms $90 per sleeping room X 60oZ $90 per sleeping room X 40o/o Hotel with standard service and more than20 sleeping rooms $54 per sleeping room X 60%$54 per sleeping room X 40oh Hotel with full service, limited service, or standard service, and 20 sleeping rooms or less $54 per sleeping room X 300%$54 per sleeping room X 25%o ZONE A - tncludes all cities p.rticipating in the District except Half Moon Bay ZONE B Includes Half Moon Bay, and most of the unincorporated aaeas of San Mateo County Assessmenl of new hotgls openins dudng fiscal year A new hotel shall be assessed for an amount equal to the ratio ofthe number of flrll quarteB remaining in the fiscal year multiptied by the full annual assessment that would have been due. A partial quarter is not coulted for the mtio. For example, ifa hotel opens in May, there are two full quarters and 2 months ofone partial quaxter remaining in the fiscal year. The futl annual assessment wou.ld b€ multiplied by 2/4 for that year,s assessment for the new hotel. TOTAL OF CITIES Rooms 2003 Assessment Per Room Belmont 563 22,377.60 $39 75 Burlingame 3,778 672,343.20 $177.96 County of San Mateo 329 8,789.40 $26.72 Foster City 503 92,772.00 $184.44 Half Moon Bay 585 60,993.90 $104 26 Millbrae 1,321 196,916.40 $149.07 Redwood City 1,271 117,639.00 $92.56 San Bruno 539 35,758.80 $66.34 San Carlos 368 15,508.80 $42.14 San Mateo 1,920 225,828.00 $117.62 South San Francisco 3,023 341,458.20 $112.95 $126.08TOTAL14,200 $1,790,385.30 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C CITIES /COUNTY 2OO1 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly Burlingame ILA lSIF-ITlA l$]A T$ln lsln lslA -ts ln lsTA--l-$ lA -tsll L$ln lslA-TsTA T$t-t ze,+4o.oo $ 84,240.00 $ t+a,eza.oo $ 170,424.00 $ 87,264.00 $ Embassy Sqles Doubletree Hotel SfO Uairiott Hyatt Rigency SrO Sheraton Gateway Hilton Garden lnn P ark Plaza lCrowni Plaza) Ramada lnn Red Roof lnn goo.oo ,340 g9o 689 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $f $ 6,120 00 7,020.00 12,402.00 14,202.00 7,272.00 r,18&00 5,6'16.00 648.00 sti.qo z+i.to 110.70 ti.go 207.90 351.00 360.00 360.00 goo.oo 360.00 789 404 132 312 144 212 91 4t 27 tgo 3778 Vagabond lnn 180.00 360^OOt--_..'-- 90.00 sa.oo J I 54.00 Iq4q_L 54.00 I sa.oo I ry0q I Room Total I 14,256.00 $ oz,agz.oo $ 7,776.00 $ 6,868.80 $ zg48+o L $ 1,328.40 $ 874.80 $ 2,494.80 $ 4,212.00 t $ Burling?me Hotel Country House Hampton lnn& Suites* Bay Landing* $ q .Rpprox. Opening date Jan - Aprll 2003 Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment SMMarriott A $ 360.00 lrota t:$672 343.2 L+ L # San Mateo Vi lla H ote $36 00 Resid e nce nn A $1 60 $5 1 84.00 $ l$ 432 00 H ilton Ga rd e n A $1 56 $6 848.00 1 404 00 H omestead Vi llag e A $54 00 1 36 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s $ $ s 4 ,406.40 $367 20 H olid ay lnn A $36 00 1 o 23 760.ooi 0o $1 98 00 Los P rados n n A $90 00 113 111 9o 57 53 48 7a L 33 4 99 6 02 $508 50 H o id ay ln n Exp rESS A 54 00 3 ,596.40 2 70 H illsdale n n A A A ln A A A A $54 00 2 I 00 $24 3 00 H owa rd J oh nso n $54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 s4 oo 54.00 54.00 1 ,846 80 $5 3 90 Super 8 Avalon Firestone Lodge San Mateo Motel Coxhead House Wingate lnn l$ls ls T$ iEl$ Iil I tl 1,717 .20 $ 1,555.20 $ 1,490.40 $ 1,069.20 $ 64.80 $ 3,207.60 $ 143.10 129.60 tzi.zo a9.to 5.40 26i 30 Room Total ' Total tg2oi: i$zzs,aia.oo SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS --- YEAR 2OO3 EXHIBIT C C-1 of 6 11t12t2002 228 $4, 54.00 180.OO -13- Name of Property Zone Gategory/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessm€ South San Francisco Embassy Suites Comfort Suites A $360.00 312 166 $67,392.00 $ 5,616.00 A $54.00 $360.00 $5,378.40 $ 448.20 $ 3,708.00 $1 521.00 $4,032.00 Grosvenor Airport lnn A 206 169 224 174 111 323 152 197 $44,496.00 Hilton Garden lnn A $180.00 $18,252.00 Holiday lnn North A $360.00 $180.00 $48,384.00 La Quinta lnn #659 A $18,792.00 $ 1,566.00 Larkspur Landing A $90.00 $5,994.00 $499.50 Ramada lnn Residence lnn A $360.00 $90.00 $69,768.00 $ 5,814.00 A $8,208.00 $684.00 Travelodge A $54.00 $6,382.80 $531.90 Airport lnn A $54.00 34 $1 ,101 .60 $91.80 Americana lnn Motel A $54.00 $180.00 17 $ $ 275.40 21,384.00 $22.95 $1,782.00Courtyard by Marriott A 198 Days lnn (ElCamino)A $54.00 $-54.00 49 $1,587.60 $132.30 Days lnn (Airport Bl.)) Deluxe lnn Economy lnn A 25 $810.00 $67.50 A $54.00 20 $$27.00 A $54.00 21 $680.40 $56.70 Hallmark House Motel A $54.00 $54.00 $54.00 13 $210.60 $17.55 Hampton lnn A 100 $3,240.00 $270.00 Howard JohnsonA/agabond A 5'1 $1,652.40 $137.70 lnn at Oyster Point A $90.00 30 $1,620.00 $135.00 Quality lnn & Suites A $54.00 $54.00 45 $1,458.00 $121.50 $-22.95Royal lnn Motel6 A 17 $275.40 A A $54.00 $54.00 $54.00 $ $ 90.00 54.00 Room Total 117 20 87 $3,790.80 $315.90 $27.00 $234.90 Travelers lnn Wingate lnn $324.00 $ $ $ 2,818.80 5,400.00 1,458.00 $341,458.20 A Sheraton Four Points Ramada Limited A 100 45 3023 Total $450.00 A $121.50 SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS.-- YEAR 2OO3 EXHIBIT C C-2 of 6 11t12t2002 324.00 t -_-----------l- l t I + Name qf Prqperty Westin Claiion El Rancho lnn Millwood lnn Travelodge Category/Assessment . ANNUAL Assessmerlt iMonthlzg!e l A A tr l$ ls ls-Tr 390 440 219 $ 34$ 58$ $ $ $ 360.00 360.00 54oO i 54.00 180.00 i 360.00 84,240.00 , 95,040.00 7,095.60 1,101.60 1,879.20 3,240.00 4,320.00 7,020 7,920 591 gt tso no MSRoo# lMillbrae Foster Half Moon Bay l lnl^ A $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 00 o0 30 80 6a 00-Eqd 360.00 lCrowne Plaza I [,larnott Courtyard- --l itl -T A A 196 916.40 Assessme Monthly assessm 36o.OO .00 .00$ 180.00 Room Total Total: Zone 'Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessm -lT 356$ 76,896.00 $ 6,408 147 $ iS,AZO.OO'$ 1,323 503 $ 92,772 oO Name of Property Beach House lnn Ritz Carlton Half Moon Bay Lodge Ramada Limited Holiday lnn Exprqgs Cameron's lnn MiltRose lnn & Garden Miramar t-oOge & Conf. Center Moon Dream Cottage Old Thyme lnn Plum Tree Court San Benito House ,The Gilchrest House Zaballa House Half Moon Bay lnn E la B fBE- lB ]q fa_ 1B lq L$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 Room Total Z% 7.s8 - - a-ls $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 46,980.00 5,832 oO l 626.40 1,123.20 40.50 1 81.00 541 $ 261 $ 811 $ 2e$ 52$ 3i $6$ 40$ 2$ 7$ 6$ 12$ 1$ 23$ 8r $ 585 180.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 i 54.00 90.00 54.00 54.00 3,888.00 $324.00 3,9'15.00 486.00 52.20 93.60 3.38 6.75 120.00 13.50 1.13 41.40 9.OO B B B B B $rt l$ 1,440.00 27.00 94.50 81.00 162.00 13 50 496.80 '108.00 Total 60 993.90 SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS --- YEAR 2OO3 EXHIBIT C C-3 of 6 11t12t2002 A l$ __ IA 100i $ 80$ ] 90.00 Room Total 1321tsTotal: Name of Property Zone # r P U Best Western Exec. Suites Costanoa Coastal lnn on Miramar Farallone lnn B&B Zone Category/Assessment # Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessmc A $54.00 $90.00 29 $626.40 $52.20 B 172 8 $6,192.00 $ $516.00 B B $54.00 $54.00 $9.00 9 $121.50 $10.13 Goose & Turrets B&B B $54.00 5 $67.50 $5.63 Harbor View lnn B $54.00 $54.00 18 $243.00 $20.25 Harbor House B 6 8 30 $81.00 $6.75 Landis Shores B $54.00 $108.00 $9.00 Motorville Motel B $54.00 $648.00 $54.00 Pacific Victorian B $54.00 3 $40.50 $3.38 Pillar Point lnn B $54.00 11 $148.50 $12.38 Princess Port B $54.00 4 10 $54.00 $4.50 SealCove lnn B $54.00 $135.00 $11.25 Lodge at Sky Londa $54.00 216.00 $18.00 Room Total Total $8,789.40 SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS --- YEAR 2OO3 EXHIBIT C C-4 of 6 11t12t2002 108.00 1 tr _r9 q 329 l Redwood City # Rooms 419 55 26 38 53 27 50 75 12 38 22 40 52 68 17 123 360.00 ment A A $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 Room Total 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 61 1271 Total: 95 ANNUAL Assessment 72.90 1 17,639.00$ 2 7 1 717.20 1 976.40 Month $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 00 1 620.00 3 985.20 194.40 70.20 078.00 90,504.00 2,203.20 842.40 1,684.80 874.80 1,782.00 135.00 332.10 148.50 22.95 140.40 183.60 275.40 1,231.20 102.60 164.70 202.50 256.50 16.20 143.10 102.60 108"00 59.40 1,231.20 1,296.00 712.80 542.00 San Bruno Redwood Motor Court Marriott Towne Place Suites Name of P Name of San Bruno lnn lnn Zone rESS Zone = A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Bu lnn Ca Hotel Pacific lnn Hotel HotelSofitel Pacific Euro Best Western lnn Sequoia Hotel I Motel Ham lnn lnnB Cable Car lnn CalWest lnn Summerfield Suites Marriott Cou Rest Ritz Motel Best lnn Best lnn uoia lnn Comfort lnn lnn Garden Motel Good Nite lnn H lnn $ $ $ $ $ $ 00 129.60 86.40 156.60 62.10 78.30 # Rooms ANNUAL $ $ 1,036.8054.00 1,555.20 Total c ment onthM $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 35 758.80 29 23 24 58 54 95 32 29 539 145.80 855.00 Room Total 939.60 1,749.60 777.60 78.30 64.80 54.00 54.00 54.00 180.00 180.00 10,260.00 15,876.00 54.00 54.00 939.60 1,879.20 745.2054.00 54.00 SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS .-- YEAR 2OO3 C-5 of 6 11t12t2002 $ 48 EXHIBIT C Zone Zone A A A A # Rooms 369.00 21.60 # Rooms 15,508.80 $ Total 32 29 368 Total $ 50 29 $ $ $116 112 UALANN Assessment assess $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 23 563 23 82 273 132 14 '16 $ $ $ 1 036.80 737.10 54.00 54.00 62.10 62.10 90.00 54.00 Room Total 2,700.00 939.60 6,264.00 939.60 3,628.80 259.20 226.80 7,128.00 594.00 18.90 745.20 745.20 54.00 90.00 54.00 Month $ $ $ $ $ 225.00 78.30 78.30 522.00 86.40 302.40 San Carlos $ $ $ $ $ $ Room Total 90.00 54.00 90.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 Bel Mateo Motel Belmont Eco lnn qlitope4vName lnn Express & Suites A A A A A A A Name of Property omesteadH Vi uestG Stese Belmont Palms Motel6 Summerfield Suites Travel lnn San Carlos e lnns of America SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS --- YEAR 2OO3 EXHIBIT C C-6 of 6 11t12t2002 Belmont 1 t$ Kingsway Motel I Tf -- 22,2??.601- Eomfort lnrl - ln E STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SIIBMITTED 21,2002 AGENDA ITEM# MTG. DATE 6b 02 TO: BY BY APPROYED F'ROM: SUBIECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUEST TO REZONE THE AT 350 BEACH ROAD FROM C-4 WATERFRONT COMMERCIAL TO O.M OFFICE MANUFACTURING. RECOMMENDATION: City Council should hold a public hearing (second reading) on the proposed ordinance to rezone the property at 350 Beach Road from C-4, Waterfront Commercial, to O-M, Offrce -Manufacturing. Action should be a motion to adopt the Ordinance amending the municipal code and zoning map. Planning Commission Action At their meeting on October 15,zooz,the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-0-1 (C. Osterling absent) to recommend to City Council the change in zoning for the newly created 18,000 SF parcel at 350 Beach Road. In their action the commissioners noted that the rezoning was appropriate because access to the larger site at 301 Airport from this location was no longer needed or appropriate, the surrounding properties were all zoned O-M and to leave this site C-4 could create a discontinuity between the zoning and iund rr. patterns on Beach Road since uses were allowed in C-4 that are not allowed in O-M; and because the change was consistent with the General Plan. BACKGROUND: General Plan Compliance The General plan rho*s the area between Airport Blvd. and US 101 as an offtce use (including Lang and Beach Road areas). This means that both the C-4 and O-M zones can be applied to implement this general plan designation. Therefore, the change in zoning will not affect the compliance with the General Plan and no General Plan amendment is required. Environmental Review The Environmental Impact Report for the 301 Airport Blvd. office project (SCH 98041109) addressed the severance and rezoning of the portion of the parcel which fronted on Beach Road (the area now referred to as 350 Beach Road). Therefore no additional environmental review is necessary for the proposed rezoning action. The Request The appficant and property owner, Glenborough Partners, is requesting that the 18,000 SF lot on Beach Road, addressed 350 Beach, be rezoned to O-M, Offrce- Manufacturing, from C-4, Waterfront Commercial, to better fit the adjacent land uses when it is developed. The applicant has made no development proposal for the site at this time. DATE: CITY PI,ANNER paBLIC HEARING ON REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPETYAT 350 BEACH ROAD FROM C-4 TTATERFRONT COMMERCIAL TO O-M OFFICE MANUFACTURING December 2,2002 The applicant has already requested and was granted a lot line adjustment which divided the original 16 acre site at 301 Airport Blvd. into two lots. The smaller lot, 18,000 SF, fronts on Beach Road. The larger parcel, 15.82 acres, has frontage on Airport Blvd. on two sides for public access. Both are legal lots. When the lot was a single lot it had a C-4, Waterfront Commercial, zoning designation. The portion of the original site fronting on Beach Road served as the access to the drive-in theater which occupied the 15.82 acre portion of the site. With the splitting offof the 18,000 SF area fronting on Beach Road, this lot would become the only lot on Beach Road zone d C-4. Moreover, some of the uses promoted by the C-4 district, restaurant, hotel, commercial recreation, are inconsistent at this mid-block location given the existing light industrial, bio-tech and trans-shipment uses existing on the remaining parcels on Beach Road. A change in zoning of the 18,000 SF lot would not affect the zoning or land use of any adjacent parcel. Any future use of the new parcel would be subject to conformity with the O-M district regulations and, if not a permitted or prohibited use, would be required to be reviewed by the city. Attachments: Monroe letter to Dan Levin, Glenborough Partners, November 7,2002, setting public hearing. Monroe letter to Dan Levin, Glenborough Partners, October 25,2002, action on lot line adjustment Planning Commission Minutes, October 15,2002 City Council StaffReport, Introduction Ordinance to Rezone the Property at 350 Beach Road from C-4 Waterfront Commercial to O-M Office Manufacturing, with Planning Commission StaffReport, October 15,2002 and its attachments. Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending the Burlingame Municipal Code and the ZoningMaps Incorporated in the Zoning Code by Reclassifying 350 Beach Road to O-M District, map attached a 1 2 aJ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 15 I6 t7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE ZONING MAPS INCORPORATED IN THE ZONING CODE BY RECLASSIFYING 350 BEACH ROAD TO O.M DISTRICT The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The zoning maps attached to Ordinance No. 539 as amended and referenced in Section 25.12.010 of the Municipal Code are amended as follows: 0.41 acres more or less (approximately 18,000 square feet) which is a portion of the Northerly half of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is due North 540.68 feet and due West 495.00 feet from the intersection of the centerline of Burlingame Avenue and the centerline of Burlingame Avenue and the centerline of the sixty foot right of way along the beach deeded to the City of San Mateo; thence from said Point of Beginning South 150,00 feet; thence East 120 feet to the Point of Beginning and commonly known as 350 Beach Road (a portion of APN 026-350-130), is reclassified from the C-4, Waterfront Commercial District, to the O-M, Office- Manufacturing Di strict. This reclassification is generally shown on the exhibit to this ordinance. Section 2. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certi$ that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 l1 t2 l3 t4 15 r6 t7 t8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 4th day ofNovember, 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day ot__,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COI.INCILMEMBERS: NOES: COLINCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS: City Clerk -2- The City of Burlingame CTTY HALL 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BI.JRLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 9401G3997 TEL: (650) ssv72s0 FAX: (650) 69G37X)PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 7,2002 Mr. Dan Levin Glenborough Partners 400 S. El Camino Real, Suite I100 San Mateo,CA 94402 Dear Mr. Levin, At the City Council meeting of November 4,2A02, the Council introduced and scheduled a public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezone the property at 350 Beach Road from the C4, Waterfront Commercial District to the O-M, Office Manufacturing District. A public hearing will be held on December 2,2002 at7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. We look forward to seeing you there to present yourproject. Please call me ifyou have any questions. Sincerely yours, Wlnnfifr^* Margatet Monroe City Planner Mlv7s 3sObeachhrgsct cca c:City Clerk The City of Burlingame PLANNING DEPARTMENT Margaret Monroe City Planner CITY HALL 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94oIO-3997 TEL: (650) 558-72s0 FAX: (650) 696-3790 October 25,2002 Mr. Dan Levin Glenborough Partners 400 S. El Camino Real, Suite 1100 San Mateo,CA 94402 Dear Mr. Levin, At their meeting on Oitober 15,2002, the Planning Commission approved the lot line adjustment creating the 18,000 SF parcel at 350 Beach Road. The Commission at the same time recommended to the City Council the rezoning of the parcel from the C4, Waterfront Commercial District to the O-M, Offrce Manufacturing District. At their meeting on November 4,2002,the City Council will introduce the ordinance for the rezoning of the new parcel at 350 Beach Road. At that meeting, the City Council will set the item for public hearing. November 18,20A2 is being suggested for the public hearing date. You may wish to attend the public hearing to present your request. Ifyou have any questions regarding the process I can be reached at (650) 558-7255. Sincerely yours, 1$/rrrt^f,"rt6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes October 15, 2002 301 AIRPORT BOTJLEVARD/3s0 BEACII ROAD -ZOI\TED C4 - (GLENBOROUGH PARTNERS, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY owNER) (20 NOTICED) pRoJEcr pLANNER: MAUREEN BRooKSA. APPLICATION FOR A LOT LINE ADruSTMENT TO CREATE A SEPARATE I8,OOO SF PARCEL AT 350 BEACH ROADb. APPLICATION FOR REZONING FROM C4 TO O-M FOR TI{E I8,OOO SF PARCEL AT 350 BEACHROAD and city names where located only have web site address left. This is a really big sign, not for finding business location but a billboard. The Hyman sign is the same length as this, but the letters are 22 inches tall while your logo is 77" and your letters larger than 20 inches. Currently you are parking a semi-truck trailer with a your logo in the front yard, is that legitimate. Applicant noted the city has approved a 10 space parking lot at the location where the semi is parked (have not yet installed paving); plan to park the semi sideways so that could have some signage, right now there is none for the building. What is thi size of the truck? It is almost the same size as the siln we are asking for. There were no furtlei comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: see difficulty in determining primary frontage, others have much reduced sigrage, think 70 SF of signage would work well, would like to see this substantially reduced; would bend some on frontage issue if it would increase flexibility and signage could be done within the code requirements. C. Boju6s moved to continue the item to give the applicant an opportunity to explore what signage program he could propose with a change in the primary frontage and having no variance requests. The moiionwas seconded by C. Auran. ... Comment on the motion: Not comfortable with redesignation of the primary fiontage, nice to front on USl0l but don't see the extraordinary circumstances called for in the variance findings, think should deny this request. Chair Keighran called for a roll call vote on the motion to continue this item. The motion faile dora24-l (Cers. Brownrigg, Keele, Keighran, Vistica dissenting, C. Osterling absent). Further discussion: sign code should hold true for this site, the applicant is trying to make a billboard ofthe side ofthe building, the code does not allow a billboard as it was intended, such an exception is an obvious advantage to the applicant. The logo is crisp and clear, it could be read at the 45 SF the iode allows, do not see the hardship. Sign is much too large, it is a billboard, even the surrounding signs are smaller, would like to see comply with the master signage requirements. C. Brownrigg moved to deny this application without prejudice to give the applicant an opportunity to revise his request and return. ,$e motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a voice vote G0- I (C. Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This iterr concluded ai I 0:20 p.m. *11. Reference staff report October 15,2002, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and city staffcomments. She noted that the Commission's action on the lot line adjustment is final and appealable to the City Council; the action on the rezoning is a recommendation to Comcil. There were no questions from Commission . l3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes t Chair Keighran opened the public hearing. Dan represented Glenborough Partners, the property owner and applicant; Russ Cohen, 605 was asked where the day care facility would be located if the site was used for The applicant noted that the lot line adjustnent had nothing to do withwhether a day care be built, this is a housekeeping matter left over from the review ofthe 301 Airport site; no v/ere no further comments and the C. Auran moved on the facts staffreport that the commission recommend to the City Council the rezoning of the site at 350 Road from C-4 to O-M because it was required as a part of the future use of301 AirportBlvd. The Vistica. is also consistent with the General Plan. The motion was secondedby C. ChairKeighran for a voice vote on the motion to rezone the lot at 350 Beach Road from C-4 to O-M. Themotion a 6-0-l (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. This action is a recommendation to the City Council and is appealable. C. Vistica approval of the lot line adjustnent to create as a separate legal lot and properly fronting Road addressed 350 Beach Road. The motion was seconded by called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the lot line to create a separate at 350 Beach Road. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C.voice vote. Appeal were advised. This item ooncluded at 10:30 p.m. IX. DESIGN RBVIEW STUDY ITEMS 12. 1637 CORONADOWAY-ZONED-R.l-APPLICA FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (JENNIFERAND DOUG RICHARD COOK & LOUIS BOBROWSKY, 'APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; (79 NOTTCED) PROJECT PLANNER: Plannsl Barber briefly presented the project There were no questions of staff. use for the site at 350 Beach Road is proposed at this time. There hearing was closed. Chair Keighran opened the public Doug Ulrich, property owner, and Richard Cook, architect, were available to answer any asked architect to explain vocabularyofthe design and how it is inkeepingwiththerestof Architect noted that they hid to tie together addition with existing house by using materials and tieing bay window elements together.Introduced arched windows and pediment to add interest and break up the mass. There were no other comments from the floor and the public was closed. Planning Commission following comments and concerns:o Looks like2 houses with different elements, existing nice elements that can be carried second level, second story doesn't go with Concern vertical element at the rear, very boxy; Small ofsquare footage added, but looks large; addition is pushed back, not over Need to dimension interior and exterior elevations; 9 footplate heights, to reduce; and with 2 feet in between floors is .,:r - *F t4 and not necessary, adds to heigbt need October 15,2002 o O o \ City of Burlingame Planntng Commission Approved Minutes October 15, 2002 Chair Keigbran opened the public hearing. Dan Levin, represented Glenborough Partners, the property owner and applicant; Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington. Applicant was asked where the day care facility would be located if the site was used for something else. The applicant noted that the lot line adjustment had nothing to do with whether a day care center would be built, this is a housekeeping matter left over from tle review ofthe 301 Airport site; no specific use for the site at 350 Beach Road is proposed at this time. There were no firther comments and the public hearing was closed. C' Auran moved on the facts in the staff report that the commission recommend to the City Council tlre rezoning ofthe site at 350 Beach Road from C4 to O-M because it was required as a part ofthe firture use of30l Airport Blvd. The rezoning is also consistent with the General Plan. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to rezone the lot at 350 Beach Road from C-4 to O-M. The motion passed on a 6-0- I (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. This action is a recommendation to the City Council and is not appealable. IX. C' Vistica moved approval ofthe lot line adjustment to create as a separate legal lot and parcel the property fronting on Beach Road addressed 350 Beach Road. The motion was seconded by c. Brownrigg. - Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the lot line adjusfinent to create a separate parcel at 350 Beach Road. The motion passed on a 6-0-l (C. Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:30 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW STI,]DY ITEMS 12.1637 CORONADO WAY-ZOI\TED-R-l -APPLICATION FORDESIGN REVIEWFORA SECOND STORY ADDITION (JENNMR AND DOUC T]LRICH, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; RIC}IARD COOK & LOUIS BOBROWSKY, ARCHITECTS) (79 NOTICED) PROJECT PI,ANNER: CATHERINEKEYLON Plenner Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. , Chair Keighran opened the public comment. Doug Ulrich, property owner, and Richard Coolg architect, were available to an$trer atry questions. Commission asked architect to explain vocabulary ofthe desigr and how it is in keeping wilh the rest ofthe neighborhood. Architect noted that they tied to tie together addition with existing house by using same finish materials and tieing bay window elements together. Intoduced arched windows and pediment roof to add interest and break up the mass. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission had the following comments and concems:o Looks like 2 different houses with different elernents, existing house has nice elements ttrat can be carried through to second level, second story doesn't go with the house;o Concem with tall vertical element at the rear, very boxy;r Small amount of square footage added, but looks large;. Appreciate that addition is pushed back, not over garage;. Need to dimension interior and exterior elevations;o 9 foot plate heights, with 2 feet in between floors is unusual and not necessary, adds to heigh! need to reduce; and t4 tall while your logo is 77" and letters larger than 20 inches. Currently you are parking a semi-truck trailer with a your logo in front yard, is that legitimate. Applicant noted the city has approved a l0 space parking lot at tion where the semi is parked (have not yet installed paving); plan to park the semi sideways so d have some sigr.age, right now there is none for the building. What is the size of the truck? It is the same size as the siln we are asking for. There were no further comments from the floor and ublic hearing was closed. ssron discussion: see dilficulty in detemrining primary frontage, others have much reduced signage, 70 SF of sigrage would work well, would like to see this substantially reduced; would bend some on issue if it would increase flexibility and signage could be done within the code requirements. C. Boju6s moved to continue the item to give the applicant an exp what sigrage program he could propose with a change in the primary frontage and variance requests. The motion was seconded by .C. Auran. Comment on the motion: Not comfortable with on of the primary frontage, nice to front on US l0l but don't see the extraordinary called for in the variance findings, think should deny this request. Chair Keigbran called for a roll vote on the motion to continue this itern. The motion failed on a 2-4-l (Cers. Brownrigg, Keele,, Vistica dissenting, C. Osterling absent). Further discussion:code should hold true for this site, the applicant is trying to make a billboard of the side ofthe code does not allow a billboard as it was intended, such an exception is an obvious advantage to licant. The logo is crisp and clear, it could be read at the 45 SF the code allows, do not see the p. Sign is much too large, it is a billboard, even the surrounding sims are would like to see y with the master sigrage requirements. C. Brownrigg moved to deny this application without prejudice to gi applicant an oppodunity to revise his request 4nd.return. The motion was secorded by C. Chair Keighran called for a voice vote on the moti deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-l (C. Osterling absent).were advised. This item concluded at I 0:20 p.m. 1I. 3OlAIRPORTBOULEYARD/3s0 cH ROAD - ZONED C4 - (GLENBOROUGH PARTNERS, APPLICANTANDPROPERTY (20 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MALIREEN BROOKS Cily ofBurlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes and city names where located, only have business location but a billboard.yman APPLICATION PARCELAT35 and appealable to the City Council; the action on the no questions from Commission . October 15, 2002 site address left. This is a really big sign, trot for finding sign is the same length as this, but the letters are 22 inches a. CHROAD b. APPLICATION FOR REZONING FROM C4 TO O-M FOR THE I8,OOO CEL AT 350 BEACH AD Reference staff report October 15,2002, with attachments. CP presented the report, reviewed criteria and city staffcomments. She noted that the on the lot line adjustment is final LOT LINE ADruSTMENT TO CREATE A SEPARATE I8,OOO SF l3 a recommendation to Council. There were nosl coll n€ rezont lure,s TO: STAFF REPORT AGDNDA ITEM# MTG. DATE 11.04.02 HONORABI,E MAYOR AND CITY COIINCIL SI]BIIIITTED DATE:ocToBER24.2002 APPROYED IROM: CIIY PLAI\II\IER SI]BIECT: INTRODUCT ORDINANCE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 350 BEACH RON) FROM C.4 WAITRTRONT COMMERCIAL TO O.M OX.f,'ICE MANTE.ACTURING City Council should set the public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezoning the newly created property addressed 350 Beach Road from C4 district to O-M district. Staffwould recommend that this item be set for public hearing at your meeting on Novemb er 21,2002. Introduction requires the following council actions. A Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading ofthe ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. BACKGROI]ITID: The applicant, Glenborough Partnerq recently applied to the Public Works Department for a lot line adjustment to the parcel at 301 Airport Blvd. in order to separate from the larger parcel the 18,000 SF area with street frontage on Beach Road. Atone time the access to the drive in theater was from this location on 'Beach Road. The lot line adjustment, approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting on October 15, 2002, created the 18,000 SF area fronting on Beach Road as a free standing parcel with the address of 350 Beach Road. Because this area was originally a part ofthe larger parcel which had stre€t frontage on Airport Blvd. it was zoned C4 Waterfront Commercial despite the fact that the properties on both side and across the sffeet were all zoned O-Iv{, Offrce IVlanufacturing. The severanoe ofthis portion of the larger parcel creates a spot of C-4 zoning in the midst of an area zond O-M. It was suggested in the environmental document for the prqiect at 301 Airport Blvd. that if this parcel were to be used separately from the larger portion ofthe parcel with Airport Blvd. frontage it should be rezoned to O-M so that the zoning and future development of the site would be consistent with the Beach/Laog Road area. No project accompanies the request for rezoni4g at this time. The applicant indicates that they are simply completing a piece of housekee,ping remaining from their previous action at 301 Airport Blvd. In that projwt it was suggested that having a main access from Beach Road to a major development on the drive-in site would be detrimental to the oristing land uses on Beach and Lang Roads. BY BY INIRODUCE ORI'INANCE TO REZONE TEE PROPERTY AT 350 BHCE ROAD FROM C4 WATERTNONT COMMERCUL TOGM OFFrcE AAXWACTUNNG Novafier 4' 2lN2 General Plan Compliance The General Plan shows the area between Airport Blvd. and US 101 as office use (including the Lang and Beach Road areas). This means that both the C-4 and O-M zones can be applied to implement this general plan designation. Therefore the change in zoning will not affect the compliance with the General Plan and no General Plan amendment is required. Environmentd Review The Environmental Impact Report for the 301 Airport Blvd. office project (SCH 98041 109) addressed the severance and rezoning of the portion of tie parcel which fronted on Beach Road. Therefore no additional environmental review is necessary for the proposed rezoning action. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission StaffRepor! 350 Beach Road Rezoning from C-4 to O-M October 15, 2002 with attachments Ordinance ! City of Burlingame Rezoningfrom C-4 to O-M Address: 350 Beach Road Meeting Date: l0ll5l02 Request: Application to Rezone an 18,000 SF parcel located at 350 Beach Road from the C4 zone district to the O-M Zone District (C.S. 25,16). Applicant and Property Owner: Dan Levin, Glenborough Partners Lot Area: 18,000 SF/0.41 Acre General Plan/Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan: Office Uses Adjacent Development: Office and Office/IVarehouse Use APN: 026-350-130 T.oningt C-4 CEQA Statusl Falls within the scope of Environmental Impact Report No. 98-2P (SCH #98041109 certified by the City Council on August 7,2000 consisting of: Draft Environmental Impact Report, September 14, 1998 Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report, January 21,1,999 Response to Comments Document, April 15,.1999 Addendum/Supplement to the Response to Comments DocumentArlovember 12,1999 Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report, March 16, 2000 Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report, June 21, 2000 Summary: The applicant, Glenborough Partners, appliedto the Public Works Departrnent for a lot line adjustment which will result in the creation of two reconfigured parcels: a separate 18,000 SF parcel at 350 Beach Road, and a larger parcel (15.82 Acres) at 301 Airport Boulevard. The applicant is requesting that the new 18,000 SF parcel at 350 Beach Road be rezoned from C-4 to O-M. In August of 2000, the City Council approved an office project on the whole site. As a part of that proposal, the portion ofthe site fronting on Beach Road was proposed to be developed as a day care center. The conditions ofapproval for that project required that a separate parcel be created for the day care center site, and that the new parcel be rezoned from C-4 to O-M to match the zoning of the surrounding parcels on Beach Road. Although approval for the offrce project expired in August, 20W, the applicant has choser.r to follow through on creating the separate parcel on Beach Road. The Planning Deparfinent required that the applicant request rezoning of the smaller parcel at the same time as the lot line adjustrnent application is processed. General Plan and Specilic Area PIan: Both the Burlingame General Plan and the Bayfront Specific Area Plan designate this property and the surrounding properties on Beach Road for office uses. The C4 and the O-M zone districts are both consistent with this plan designation. The C-4, Waterfront Commercialzone district was created to apply to land uses and site development which will benefit from their proximity to the open water areas ofthe San Francisco Bay and will be beneficial to the public use of this irreplaceable natural resource. The O-M, Office/lvlanufacturing district, was created as an offrce/light industrial park area which will serye as a transition between the C4 Waterfront Commercial and the M-l Light tndustrial Dishict. In its uses, the O-M District is consistent with the intent of the General Plan to provide professional and administrative offices, distribution, service, light industial and other uses supported by access to San Francisco International Airport and the adjacent hotel, restaurant and other bayfront commercial activities. Calendar il Rezoningfrom C4 to O-M 350 Beach Road Ifthe new parcel were to remain zoned C.4, development under the C-4 regulations would be inconsistent with the pattern of the existing O-M zoned properties in the area, since it would be the only parcel on the block zoned C4. It should also be noted that the creation of the new parcel on Beach Road would preclude the 15.82 acre parcel from gaining access from Beach Road. This will help minimizethe future traffic impacts from development of the larger site to the businesses on Beach Road. Staff Comments; The ChiefBuilding Inspector, the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer had no conrments on this project. Study Meeting: At the September 23,2002 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commissioners asked if the rezoning will still allow a day care center on the site. Pianning staff would note that the day care center would require a conditional use permit in the O-M zone district for "a commercial use similar in nature to one for which a permit is required" in the O-M or any other district (C.S. 25.43.030 (17). A day care center would also require a conditional use permit on the same basis in the C-4 zone district. The Commission also asked ifthe parking requirement is different for a daycare center in C-4 as opposed to O-M zoning. Staff would note that parking requirements are generally determined by use, not by the zone, so the requirements would be the same in either district. The O-M district does have a provision that for class or school use, the parking requirement is one space for each 300 SF of gross floor area, where the general requirement for a school use is one space for each 50 SF ofclassroom area. The Commission asked if this prgposal would be considered spot zoning. Since the zoning ofthis parcel would be the same as the parcels which surround it on Beach Road, and since the zoning is consistentwith the General Plan and Specific Area Plan designations, it would notbe considered spot zoning. f indings for a Rezoning: In acting onthe requestto rezonetheproperty from C4to O-M, the Pianning Commission should statethe reasons why they feel such action is appropriate and consistent with the intent of the zoningordinance. Code Section 25.04.010 states that the zoning ordinance is established for the following purposes:r to promote public health, safety and welfare;. preserve a wholesome serviceable and attractive community which increase the safety and security ofhome life; ' promote harmonious character and economy among property, building construction and civic services;, establish regulations to limit the location, uses, height, bulk, occupancy, lot coverage, street setback, yard sizes and occupancy ofbuilding structures and land;r encourage remodeling of existing residential structures;! preserye residential neighborhood character of single family structures and accessory structures and ' provide for the best general civic use to protect the common rights and interests of all. -2- Since the new parcel will not be directly adjacent to the bay, it is more appropriately placed in the O-M zone district. In addition, it will be subject to the same use requirements and properly development standards (setbacks, height, lot coverage) as the O-M zoned properties which surround it on Beach Road; Rezoningfrom C-4 to O-M 350 Beach Road Public Notice: A rezoning request requires notice of the public hearing to be made to all property owners within a 500'radius of the site instead of 300'. This application has been so noticed. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Afiirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings for the record. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. Planning Commission action on the rezoning is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission's action on the lot line adjustnent, which should be taken separately, is final with the Planning Commission unless appealed. Maureen Brooks Senior Planner c: Dan Levin, Glenborough Partners, applicant U:\SR-COMME\?50 Beach Road SR.doe -3- City of Burlingame Planning D€partnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558:725A F(650) 69G3790 www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLAIYNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review_ Conditional Use Permit_ Variance__ Special Pel:nit_ Other_farcel Project Por+o APPLICANT A-natrno{; D*"r Larr. Name: GLqnrpoBoue * P*pnrElzs N Address:s, €c Cptnv SU phlne (go 3y3 -oo Phone s33-D 7l PROPERTY OWNilER ame:.*M€ -., CiMStatelZio: ARCIIITECT/DESIGI\TER N^ ", N/A Address Phone (w): Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION : P€ZotJ€FRot4 C-qrooM/N @MtTtftfafio nl w tn-l Lor t -t *OctlsfnAl? Af,'FADAYIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certiff under penalty of perjury that the inforrration given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. ( PCAPP.FRM "ignutor", /n n " / fo ,u' oat , ? /? /oa Property owner's ,ignu*", ,C.A*',., / n , - out": 4/? /o < Date submi tt"a' "/?/oz September 10,2002 Ms. Maureen Brooks Planning Department City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 GLENBOROUGH RECEI\IED sEP 1 0 2002 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT Dear Maureen: You suggested that a brief letter might be helpful in explaining our proposed lot-line adjustment and rezoning application. As you know, we always envisioned creating a separate parcel of approximately 18,000 square foot at 350 Beach Road. We have decided to do this now by making the lot line adjustment that is described on the submittals the Public Works Department has reviewed. The property was always two separate lots and we are simply moving the line that defined those lots. Concurrently with the creation of this separate parcel, the Planning Department had always required that the zoning be changed from C-4 to O-M. This change would make the zoning of this parcel consistent with all of the other property on Beach Road. Accordingly, we are processing the lot line adjustment and the rezoning simultaneously. If there are any questions, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, GmNsonoucH PARTNERS By: DeNrcr Levnr 400 South El Camino Real . San Mateo, California 94402-1708.650.343.9300. fax 650.343.9690 utilhilt {Ztu;/- fu City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes a ould there still bea variance if the o Does o How September 23, 2002 of the site were side facingUS 101; is the sign so so much it (web site, phone appears like a could be 10% to smaller and still be from the freeway; commission have ty to change the frontage the Scuba Lessons ? Does it meet our now? Since there were no comments Chair setthisitemon action calendar the questions had been and staffhas had to review them and a staffreport. This concluded at7:17 p.m. 2. 301 ATRPORT BOULEVARD/3s0 BEACH ROAD - ZONED C-4 -(GLENBOROUGH PARTNERS, APPI,TCANT A PROPERTY OWNER) o APPLICATION FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO CREATE A SEPARATE 18,OOO SF PARCEL AT 350 BEACH ROAD. PROJECT ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG APPLICATION FOR REZOI{ING FROM C-4 TO O-M FOR THE I8,OOO SF PARCEL AT 350 BEACH ROAD PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked:o Will the rezoning proposed still allow a daycare center on the 350 Beach Road site;o Is the parking requirement different for a daycare center in C-4 as opposed to O-M; ando Is this proposal spot zoning. Since there were no further comments, Chair Keighran set this item for the regular action calendar by the Planning Commission when all the information has been submitted . This item concluded at 7:23 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS C - hems on the are beroutine. Theyare simultaneously unless separate and/or action is requested applicant, a thepublic or a comm to the time the commission votes motion to adopt. There were no items consent calendar. vIII.ACTION 3.D TION ON PERSONAL QUALIFY TAIL SALES AT AND BEAUTY SPAS SCHEIKOWTZ,';LOEZ LOUISA KAO, Reference September 23,2002,attachments. CP presented the reviewed criteria and Commissioners have any use permits for and Beauty Spas been CP noted none.the recommendation class size this was reviewed noted that the code associated with a use as three or people, such classes so that the class use a conditional use permit in A; thepurposeofa usepermit regulated to have the A. B. 2 can impact on parking in area. R.ESOLUTION APPROVING REZOMNG RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Bwlingame that: WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for an office project and daycare center on this site, which included evaluation of dividing the property and rezoning of an 18,000 SF parcel from C-4 to O-M and this project falls within the scope of that Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, application has been made for a rezonins from C-4 to O-M at 350 Beach Road. zoned C-4. Glenborough Parhrers: portion of APN: 026-350-130 (see attached legal description. Exhibit "A"; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission ofthe City ofBurlingame on October 15. 2002 . at which time it reviewed and considered the staffreport and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: l. On the basis of Environmental Impact Report No. 98-2P (State Clearinghouse No. 98041 109) certified by the City Council on August 7 ,2002,and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that the project is within the scope of that Environmental Impact Report. 2. It is recommended that the Council of the City of Burlingame approve said rezoning from C-4 to O-M. Findings for such rezoning are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the offrcial records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN P I ann ing Commi s s ion Re so lution Rezoning 350 Beach Road I, Ralph Osterling , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certi$, that the foregoing resolution was infroduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 15th day of October , 2002 ,by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY 2 EXHIBIT ''A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL TO BE REZONED F'ROM TIIE C-4 ZONE DISTRICT TO TIIE O.M ZONE DISTRICT A portion of the Norttrerly half of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: -3- BEGINNING at a point which is due North 540.68 feet and due West 495.00 feet from the inersection of the centerline of Burlingame Avenue and the centerline of the sixty foot right of way along the beach deeded to the City of San Mateo; thence from said Point of Beginning South 150.00 feet; thence West 120 feet; thence North 150.00 feet; thence East 120 feet to the Point of Beginning. -- . _f ,*!-1.r, 1r -. I .i qr I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 1l t2 l3 t4 l5 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDINAI\CE NO. ORDINATICE OF TITE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THEBURLINGAME MUIVCIPAL CODE AND THE ZONING MAPS INCORPORATEDIN TIIE ZONING CODE BY RECLASSIF"NNG 350 BEACH ROAD TO O.M DISTRICT The CITY COUNCIL ofthe CITY oF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section l. The zoning maps attached to Ordinance No. 539 as amended and referenced in Section 25.12.010 of the Municipal code are amended as follows: 0.41 acres more or less (appro:<imately 18,000 square feet)'which is a portion of the Northerly half of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is due North 540.68 feet and due West 495.00 feet from the intersection of the centerline of Burlingame Avenue and the centerline ofBurlingame Avenue and the centerline ofthe sixty foot right ofway along the beach deeded to the City of San Mateo; thence from said point of Beginning South 150,00 feet; thence East 120 feet to the Point of Beginning and commonly known as 350 Beach Road (a portion of ApN 026-350-130), is reclassified from the C-4. Waterfront Commercial District, to the O-M, Office- Manufacturing Di strict. This reclassification is generally shown on the exhibit to this ordinance. section 2. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City ofBurlingame, do hereby certift that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ I 2 aJ 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 l1 l2 l3 t4 t5 t6 t7 l8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 - day Council held on the_ day AYES: COTINCILMEMBERS: NOES: COTINCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meetirtg of the City 2002, by the following vote: City Clerk -2- 87.00. TUDE STREET DEDrcANON(rcL s6i0 o.R. PG. 2e1) AIRPORT BOULEVARD EAST oo o;NN IFcoz. 9,t5.66' PARCTL I DOC 99010885 o orNF =oo F. ooz PARGEL . EAST 945.26', t'ooog) 00' PARCEL 1 ooo l E.oo' 2 P08 Poa 1 NEW LOT LINE 61 M21zUNIT NO. 1 POB Por. 28-0o' TFE NZA AIRPORT PARK 9 394.26' A z. trJ tc(r, lu trJo z G,ct Jtrlzz. ro Fzo E c) o o,6tF. =o -oF oz Siproct -13-o? 6.*do-{2i or .-.kI =vo\q6 3d 8:1 *L.g HsLit-- o O-U)F o-x lrJ a e l{ 5 o a z.LP^rgFoiHa. H5lt *-g \ts8sic (} BEACH ROAD crvtL 2ff2P DATE: 6/12/02 SCALE: 1'-2OO'Bonley CoNsul-rlr*e IA75 SOUTH GRANr STREET, SI.'TE 55O SAN MATEO. CA 94402 65G358-1444 . FAX 650.359.14A7 .EB No. 2OO22O PARCEL I_ DOC 99010885 928 86' I I l-oto.Lor LINE o il[, $ l,* EXHIBIT B LOT UNE ADJUSruENT DWG: LLA c z- AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 6c STAFF REPORT 12t2t2002 TO:Honorable Mavor and SUBMITTED BY DATE: November 5 .2002 APPROVED BY FROM:I-arrv E- A Citv Attornev ADOPT ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 18 TO REMOVE CERTAIN REFERENCES TO PEX AND CPVC SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt ordinance to amend Title 18 to delete certain references to PEX and CPVC by: A. Adopting the proposed ordinance. B. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance within l5 days of its adoption. DISCUSSION: On September 3, 2002, the City Council adopted the 3O-page local amendments to the Califomia Construction Codes. These were based on the 1998 Uniform Codes, which the State of California is now implementing on November 1,2002. Among the provisions adopted was permission to use PEX and CPVC pipe and fittings in certain water systems. Some argue that these plastic-based materials will make housing and construction less expensive; others argue that they remain of dubious safety in water systems. The State was unable to reach a conclusion so they weie not part of the California Plumbing Code. Manufacturers have brought suit in Los Angeles asking the courts to order adoption of the 1998 Uniform Plumbing Code including pEX. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 467 has requested the City to delete the local amendments involving PEX and CPVC and to instead wait for the State to complete its analysis. When that would occur is unknown. These amendments have little effect in the City; they are most likely to be used in new construction of large scale housing developments. The costs and staff time involved in trying to make those amendments wort would far exceed any return value to the City at this time. Therefore, staff recommends that the Council adopt an ordinance to delete the two sections that alter the general State standards for PEX and CPVC. Mayor and Council Re: Ordinance to Amend Title 18 to Remove Certain References to PEX and CPVC November 5,2002 Page2 Attachment Proposed Ordinance Distribution Director of Public Works Chief Building Official ORDINANCE No._ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 18.12 BECAUSE OF DISPUTE BETWEEN INTERESTED GROUPS AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA The CITY COLINCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows Section 1 . For more than a decade, contractors, labor organizations, manufacturers, and the State of California have fought over the usability of various types of materials in construction. While the 1998 Uniform Plumbing Code would allow certain applications of what is known as CPVC and PEX piping in water distribution, the State of California declined to adopt those provisions because the State had not completely reviewed the issue. Manufacturers have now brought suit against the State to compel the adoption of some or all of those provisions. The City cannot afford the costs of getting caught between these warring groups, so therefore, the provisions regarding CPVC and PEX should be dropped. Section 2. Section 18.12.035 is repealed. Section 3. Section 18.12.040 is repealed. Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City of Burlingame, do hereby certifu that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day o&ember,2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day ot_,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 1 j 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 t4 l5 t6 t7 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COLJNCILMEMBERS: C :\FI LES\ORDINANC\upc&pex. bld.wpd City Clerk 2 t\ AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 12t2t2002 6d STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable and Council BY DATE: November 5.2002 APPROVED BY FROM:T.arru tr A ^ Citv Atfornev SUBJECT: ADOPT ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE FEEDING OF ANIMALS AND BIRDS ON CITY PROPERTY OR OTHER PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt ordinance prohibiting the feeding of animals and birds on City property or the property of others without permission by: A. Adopting the proposed ordinance. B. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance within 15 days of its adoption. DISCUSSION: At the October 21,2002, Council meeting, the Council received a staff report on possible approaches to nuisances created by birds in the City's commercial areas and discussed those alternatives. While State law as well as the Burlingame Municipal Code provide penalties for general littering, it appears that an ordinance that prohibits the feeding of birds and animals on City property or the property of olhers when permission has not been given would provide law enforcement with an additional tool to use in dealing with this issue. The attached ordinance was introduced on October 2l andfurther reading was waived at that time. It would prohibit the feeding of animals or birds on public property, except at an approved feeding station or when the animal or bird is actually owned by the person. The ordinance would also prohibit a person from feeding animals or birds on someone else's property. It would not prohibit bird feeders, for example, on one,s own property. Violation of this ordinance would be an infraction, subject to a $100 fine on first offense. However, the fine or citation would depend on the nature of the problem, and of course, would remain subject to other laws and penalties. / r./ Mayor and Council Re: Adopt Ordinance Prohibiting the Feeding of Animals and Birds on City Property or Other Property Without Permission November 5,2002 Page2 Staff is also working on a flyer to go to restaurants in the commercial areas that would encourage them to dispose of waste materials in a covered container. Staff will also be working with the Chamber of Commerce to place information in the monthly newsletter. Attachment Proposed ordinance Distribution Chief of Police Director of Public Works 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 13 I4 15 I6 t7 18 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 9 TO REGULATE FEEDING OF ANIMALS AND BIRDS ON CITY PROPERTY AND PROHIBITING FEEDING OF ANIMALS AND BIRDS ON OTHER PROPERTY WITHOUT OWNER'S PERMISSION The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The City has received complaints that birds have become a nuisance in certain locations in the City. A deterrent to this tlpe of nuisance is the discouragement of public feeding, particularly in concentrated forms. In addition, this ordinance will prohibit the use of other City facilities to attract animals and endanger both citizens and wildlife. Section 2. A new Section 9.08.080 is added as follows: 9.08.080 Feeding prohibited on city property and property of others. (a) Except at feeding stations that are expressly authorized by the city manager or the manager's designee, it is unlawful for any person to do the following on any city property or city right-of-way: (1) To feed any bird or animal that is not legally owned by that person; or (2) To place any feed of any kind that is intended for consumption by any animal or bird of any kind or to attract any animal or bird of any kind. (b) It is unlawful for any person to feed or to place any feed of any kind that is intended for consumption by any animal or bird of any kind or to attract any animal or bird of any kind on any property owned or controlled by another person without the express permission of the owner or person in control of the property. (c) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: ( 1 ) "Feed" means any material, including but not limited to, birdseed, bird feed, corn, bread pieces, food scraps, domestic animal food, or any similar substance that can be utilized for consumption by animals or birds to provide nourishment. (2) "To feed" means to spread, cast, lay, deposit, or dump feed. 1 I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 t2 13 14 15 t6 t7 18 t9 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day ofNgyeuber,2002, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of _ ,2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C :\FILE S\ORDINANC\b irdfeed. cdf. wpd 2 AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 6e STAFF REPORT 12t2t2002 TO Honorable Mavor and S BY DATE: November 26.2002 BY FROM Larrv E. Anderson- Citv SUBJECT: DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NUISANCE EXISTS RE,GARDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 107 HIGHLAND A VENUE,CA - APN RECOMMENDATION: A. Hold public hearing and determine whether accessory structure at 107 Highland Avenue violates Municipal Code. B. If violations are found to exist, adopt proposed resolution authorizing abatement of structure. DISCUSSION: Over a year ago, City staff found that the owner of the property at 107 Highland Avenue was building an accessory structure against the rear property line of the property. No permits from any City department had been issued for the construction, and the structure appeared to violate construction and zoningrestriitions in the Municipal Code. A stop work order was placed on the construction on December 3, 2001. The owner, Edward Neizman, did not respond to the stop work order. The Code Enforcement Officer contacted Mr. Neizman in September 2002, and Mr. Neizman promised in writing that he would demolish the structure in 30 days (about October 4,2002). No demolition occurred. Over the next month, Mr. Neizman repeated his promise to demolish the structure. To date, he has removed only the roof. Therefore, this matter has been brought forward to the City Council for authorizationto proceed with the steps reasonably necessary to obtain compliance. The structure that has been built is approximately eleven feet high and located in the back corner of the property using the adjacent property line walls for support. Under the California Building Code, "structure" is defined as "that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some /J Mayor and Council Re: 107 Highalnd Avenue November 26,2002 Page2 definite manner." Section 220. The City Zoning Code uses a similar definition: "anything constructed or erected, except fences, the use of which requires permanent location on the ground or attached to something having a perrnanent location on the ground." Section 25.08.640. Staff believes that the accessory structure at 107 Highland Avenue is in violation of the following provisions: A. No permit obtained for construction. Section 301.1 of the Uniform Administrative Code adopted by Chapter 18.07 of the Municipal Code requires permits from the City for construction of structures, with certain exceptions. Among those exceptions provided by both the Administrative Code and the Building Code are accessory structures of 200 square feet or less; however, this structure is more than 200 square feet in size. B. The structure is located directly on property line and is without any fire resistance of any kind. California Building Code Section 503.2 requires fire resistance dependent on proximity to property line, so that fires cannot easily spread from property to property, particularly in an urbanized setting such ai Highland Avenue. C. California Building Code Section 503.3 also requires minimum separation of structures so that fire spread is minimized. In this case the structure is immediately adjacent to other structures without any fire separation or protection. D. California Building Code Section 1806.3 also requires structures to be self-supporting. This structure is actually built onto the existing property line walls. If the walls were removed, the structure would collapse. In addition to the violations of the California Construction Codes, the Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit or variance for an accessory structure that is more than l0 feet tall, more than 120 square feet, and less than 4 feet from another structure. No such permit or variance has been obtained. The general purpose of these requirements is to provide an urban environment that does not unnecessarily intrude on the property of others and reduces the jumble of unplanned construction. As shown in the attached memorandum from the Code Enforcement Officer, the City has attempted to obtain the cooperation of the owner for over a year. On November 22,2002, notice of this hearing on fublic nuisance was posted on the property and notice mailed to the owner. Burlingame Municipal Code Section 1.12.040 is very direct: Any building, property or structure erected, constructed, altered or maintained andlor any use of property contrary to the provisions of this code is unlawful and a public nuisance, and any failure, refusal or neglect to obtain a permit as required by the terms of this code is prima facie evidence of the fact that a nuisance has been committed in connection with the use, erection, construction, alteration or maintenance of any building, property, structure erected, constructed, altered, maintained or used contrary to the provisions of this code. Mayor and Council Re: 107 Highalnd Avenue November 26,2002 Page 3 Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached resolution that: - Affirms that the property constitutes a public nuisance pusuant to Section 1.12.040 and Chapter 1 .16 providing for abatement of nuisances; - Authorizes staff to take those steps necessary to abate the structure by demolition and removal; - Authorizes staff to obtain a warrant or other court order to perform the work; - Authorizes the City Attomey to file such further civil or criminal actions in Municipal or Superior Court as necessary to correct health and safety concems on the property; - Directs staff to return with a statement of the costs of correction for placement as a lien against the property and collected through next year's property taxes. If the Council approves the resolution, staff will proceed with the steps outlined in the resolution. Attachment Proposed Resolution Code Enforcement Officer Report dated November 20,2002 Notice posted on property on November 22,2002 Distribution Planning Director Fire Marshal Chief Building Official Mayor and Council Re: 107 Highalnd Avenue November 26,2002 Page 3 Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached resolution that: - Affirms that the property constitutes a public nuisance pursuant to Section 1.12.040 and Chapter 1.16 providing for abatement of nuisances; - Authorizes staff to take those steps necessary to abate the structure by demolition and removal; - Authorizes staff to obtain a warrant or other court order to perform the work; - Authorizes the City Afiorney to file such further civil or criminal actions in Municipal or Superior Court as decessary to correct health and safety concerns on the property; - Directs staff to return with a statement of the costs of correction'for placement as a lien against the property and collected through next year's property taxes. If the Council approves the resolution, staff will proceed with the steps outlined in the resolution. Attachment Proposed Resolution Code Enforcement Officer Report dated Novembet 20,2002 Notice posted on property on Novembet 22,2002 Distribution Planning Director Fire Marshal Chief Building Official RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DECLARING THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 107 HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE PURSUANT TO BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS I.12 AND 1.16 AND AUTHORIZING CITY FORCES AND CONTRACTORS TO REMOVE THE STRUCTURE 107 HIGHLAND AVENUE OWNER: EDWARD NEIZMAN APN:029-231-120 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY of BURLINGAME that: WHEREAS, this matter came before the City Council on December 2,2002, for public hearing for consideration pursuant to Burlingame Municipal Code Chapters I . 12 and I . l6; and WHEREAS, proper notice of this public hearing was given by both letter to the apparent property owner and notice posted on the property at 107 Highland Avenue; WHEREAS, at the public hearing on December 2,2002, the City Council has considered all written and oral testimony submitted to it regarding the property at 107 Highland Avenue, including the staff report dated November 26,2002; and WHEREAS, the property atl07 Highland Avenue contains an accessory structure that has been erected without benefit ofthe required permits from the Building or Planning Departments; and WHEREAS, the structure is more than l0 feet tall; and WHEREAS, the structure is more than 120 square feet; and WHEREAS, the structure is built on property line at the rear ofthe property atl07 Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the structure is without fire resistance and is without independent support; and WHEREAS, the construction of the structure violates Sections 503.2,503.3, and 1806.3 of the Califomia Building Code as adopted by the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the property owner has been afforded over a year after notice to correct the situation and has not done so; and WHEREAS, the proximity of the deficient structure to other structures and property creates a threat to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood; and 1 WHEREAS, City officials should be authorized to proceed with necessary corrective measures to abate the public nuisance at107 Highland Avenue removal of the structure, further lien proceedings, and necessary court and administrative action; and WHEREAS, this enforcement action is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15321 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, contained in Title l4 of the California Code of Regulations, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered and directed as follows: 1. Theaccessorystructure atl07 HighlandAvenue,Burlingame,California,is declared to be a public nuisance. 2. The property owner, Edward Neizman, is hereby ordered to remove the structure no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 18, 2002. 3. The Directorof Public Works, the Chief Building Official and the City Attomey are authorized and directed to proceed with abatement of the nuisance pursuant to Chapter l.l6 of the Burlingame Municipal Code through use of City or contracted forces. 4. The City Attorney is authorized and directed to obtain such orders and warrants as necessary to assist in the abatement provided above, and further to file such civil and criminal actions and to record such notices as necessary to obtain abatement and payment of costs incurred. 5. The Director of Public Works is further directed to account for all City costs incurred in the abatement process, including all City staff time involved, and to return to the City Council for hearing and consideration of those costs. Those costs shall be subject to being placed as a lien on the properfy at 107 Highland Avenue, assessment on the real property tax bill for the property, and collection through such actions as necessary. This decision is a final administrative decision of the City of Burlingame. Anyone wishing to challenge this decision in a court of competent jurisdiction must do so within 90 days pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 unless a shorter time is provided by State or Federal law. 2 Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk ofthe City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _ day of _,2002, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COLINCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: City Clerk 3 To:ttorney From:Fred Subject: Public Nuisance Declaration, 107 Highland Avenue Date:November 20,2002 Request:That the city council hold a public hearing to determine whether or not the accessory structure built to the rear of 107 Highland and attached to the adjacent property is a public nuisance. Additionally we are requesting permission to obtain an inspection warrant to enter the property and hire a contractor to remove the structure. Definition Section 1.16.010 Nuisance defined. 1. A nuisance, within the meaning of this chapter, is defined as anything which is dangerous, injurious or a menace to health or safety, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or is an obstruction to the free use ofproperty, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyrnent of life or property, or which unlawfully obstructs the free passage or use in the customary fi)alrner ofany streaoq or any public park, square, street or highway, or which by any provision of this code is specifically declared to be a nuisance; provided" however, nothing which is done or rnaintained under the express authority oflaw is a nuisance. (1941 Code $ 105). Facts: On November 15, 2001 the building department had received a complaint that there was an illegal structure being built on the rear portion of 107 Highland Avenue. Building lnspector Owyang went to the site and observed the structure. It had failed to meet the requirements of the building code and the Larry t ff I ir; i: ;t: , :. i :: \ i.r.' \ 1,,' : 1-.q"$**"'*- * ,-::::_-h_ _'_'-' Page2 - 107 Highland Building Inspector Owyang left a stop work notice at the property on December 3, 2001 and required the owner to obtain a permit within ten days. September 3, 2002, I telephoned Mr. Neizman and requested that he gither obtain a permit or demolish the structure. He informed my that he would be in contact with the Building Dept on September 46. September 4, 2002,1vt. Neizman left a note for Inspector Owyang that he was demolish the structure within 30 days. On October 16,2002 it was turned over to our office for followup since no apparently compliance was obtained.. I made contact with the owner, Mr. Edward Neizman and arranged for an inspection of the structure. Inspector Owyang and I went to the site on October l6th and found that the structure was still in place and several building code violations existed. Mr. Neizman stated again that he would comply with our requirements. 2001 Califomia Building Code, section 106.21, Construction of a storage shed over 120 square feet without a permit. 2002 C.B.C., section 503.2.1, Fire resistive construction of walls and proximity of roof overhang to property lines. 3. 2001 C.B.C., section 503.3 not sufficient separation between structures. 2 4. 2001 C.B.C. section 1806.3, structure not independently supported. city. It was constructed too close to the main house, it was 220 square feet in size , far in excess ofthe 100 square feet allowed for an accessary structure without a permit . It was attached to a neighboring structue without the benefit of an adequate one hour fire separation. No permits had been obtained. May 21,2002 , Owyang retumed to the area and found that the owner had been unresponsive to his requests to obtain or apply for a building permit. 1. Page3-107Highland Building Inspector Owyang then mailed a certified letter to Mr. Neizman to remove the structure by no later than November 4,2002. On November 6, 200z,Inspector Onvyang made another site visit to leam that nothing was done to remove the structure. On November 6, 2002Mr. Neizman came into City Hall and spoke with me. He promised that he would have the structure removed by no later than November 11,2002. November 18,2002,Inspector Owyang re-inspected the property and found that only the plywood on the roof had been removed. The remainder of the skucture was still in place. After inspecting the structure on November 20,2000, Building Official Cullum confirmed the aforementioned violations and has determined that the structure, as pre$ently built, is a hazard. [f completed and enclosed the structure would present a significant fire hazard and its removal by the city would be far more expensive It appears that after an extended period of time and numerous attempts to have Mr. Neizman comply with the building code and city ordinances that he is not willing to do so. Therefore a legal remedy must be obtained to ensure compliance. t\ ,l I iy., t ,;.- t.'. \i ,,' ,tl- ; .--- .j I iI i t : .t I I ItIi I i I -1 I : ti :{ .:J .: i !.i :: ;,. . .ii ,i , 1.,: !r i' j l1:,. , :l: :l.l .;j- ;. ] '-l:- .\ .r 1- ai :. ..rr. " .ri , -tl' .{ ODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT Y Type Address LName FName Phone Date Case RPLaName RPFNam RPAddreS RPPhone How Originating Dept H Out 107 6196698 200201 Owyang ln Person Building Dept lnspection E ONotified M Business Remarks Dispo 11t15t02 Neizman advises that he complaints about illegal at this and the owner had been , I telephoned the owner and relayed the request to a permit or demolish the structure. On 9/4/02 he a handwritten note to the bldg dept that he remove the structure within 30 days' Slnce nothing had been done to comply I made contact with the owner and ananged for an inspection. Ted and I out on 10/16 and met with the owner. Several violations were noted and will be addessed by a letter from Ted to the owner with specific deadlines and 1116102, owner failed to comply with 11/4 to remove shed. 1'116102, Phone call to him and he stated that he would remove it by no later than 11/1 1/02. Confirming certlfied letter sent. Also an application for an exception for a fence that exceeded the 7 ft limit was not filed. letter sent to 1110 Bayswater and 107 Highland a deadline ot 1 1 I 1 5lO2 sent'certifi ed. 1 1/1 2/02, submitted to planning for the fence exception' 11t18102 - Bldg lnspector Owyang reported that as of only the plyr,vood roof has been removed and the of the structure is still attached to tho bldg wall (adiacent property) and poses a fire hazard 'l City Hall 1Autonumber DateDue 0DATE 3 FILE ADDREIIq: COMPLAINANT NAME(8) : ADDRE6S: COHPLAINT: FEoUA (USE ITEVERSE SIDg I8 ADDTTIONA! NEEDEO} RESEARCH CURRENT OITNER:El)N€ I?:HAN ADDRES6:lol \-l tGhLAe..to CURRENT REEIDENT: LOT: _ BT,OCK !. S0BDMEION: DATE RESEARCE NOTES: Aru zourNc PEONE ) ITEX CEECEDr3E{ CEECKED. Euglueerl-ug RecordaAE6escor6 Rolt6 qaD.bora !{8pEPl8rquiDg FiIe6 l,arlat PhoCogrsphEBuildiug File6 R6verro Directoryklater Dept. FileE ACI'ION 1'.4"KEN DATEDs {l- \5 -6' DATE Or: 6ITE I}iSPECUON: I2'3-O) LETTER: I{ASNTNG NOTICE: 7 \L-3-o) 6rtE rN6PEerroN BINDTNGE/acfroN No'IB6 3 (3-OCt< i/-To loAeY)u2 6Kr l4A-ftr1 qtc a \iJ I WOO r, )St COMPLAIN'T FOW Dr:ra REITERRED TO: Tr*r s v rcr,r-r€S SiC-ii (r r.r J. 1991 \Jr3C .l A6.L,\ t:Na qO), z, I LeFT r^rna r.: trvc uon.f -To Pl.tr troz Y?H4r-l r i- 1^',7t-t(^.r l(J l.)A1q WARNING NOTICE CITY OF BUTILINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAI'IE CA 94010 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A VIOLATION OF THE BURLINGA.I'IE }'IUNICIPAL CODE EXISTS AS DESCRIBED BELOW. FAILURE TO COI{PLY WITHIN THE TI}'IE SPECIFIED WILL RESULT IN A CRIMINAL INFRACTION AND/OR IN A CIVIL SUIT REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION BY YOU. DATE -j - ol ADDRESS tO1 Hrca UO LOCATION OF OFFENS.E o-t Ht &l-(Arrrn1 Code Section D€scrip tion of Violation a t'rulMrN6 1 f Wao tx1qr, EIECTI'? , AePAt4S I ^, Malx.l /{O\^iE rnrr?t.} oVT fA? (; Enecrr oN oF l2t X;1.ll 2< to d tG r-l ,'(r<\)qur<e rTHao T- W H (-7- N^ special permit, variance, or building permit may be issued to legalize .;.-s violation.Y.,t It must be corrected Ort- 0,(corrective work) Further enforcement actiotr will be suspended steps is taken wit[in the prescribed time lim tl Within 10 calendar days, file an application for a variance or a pecial Permit.See ltem rA' on reverse. tr Within 10 calendar days, file an application for a building permit. See ftem 'B' on reverse ' Within 10 calendar days, file an aPPlication for a business license' See tCt on reverse . ) ssuing Officer -i-, o,TitIe br r i".6t P A*tf?€L-Te lephonc if one of the following its: I |4ethod of deliverY notice-tNY 6/aS o^t r '€n C, r-r n oO 5'K.-ftt/< FrLE VIOL/.\T{oNS NAME i.lrut(s o, Jnl 54ri -1) l-Q v .\., url t , ur! CITY OF BURLINGAMT Y la I I BUILDIN(; INSPEC]TION D]VIDION50I PfiIIVIROSIi ROAD, BTIRLINGAME, CA 94OIOTELEpHONE : 650_55 8_7260 J lwRtl€ FtRMLy ON HARO SURFAC€| Site Adrlress: Type of Work: Dcr cription/Re rnarkr b I GVL hrta sr1 CTK * STOP WORK NOTICE ,r PERMITS REOUIRED; No bui.).ding, structure or part thereofshall b.e erected, constructld, .la";;J;enlarged, improved, fepaired, *o".a,removed, converted or demolished unl.esspermits have first been oUtuined iro,,the City Building official. UBc 301(a) ff you fail to complyf\!_!!is-request, this noii"L ,uy be,- r-€rrert to the City Attorney,s oif icefor legaI action. @ ORIGINAL NOT TO LEAVE THE UOA SIIE r<9lrtr-D orr C'AI trr<ol r \^, I a*r..t qe l*o S. .- ,Pector eu," Fzl-q1 STOP WORK NOTICE IP ea 5 e s ubm tI e irm t a I cIp ta Lpp on ot t h eIBudIIsnrtoingnDi1pecsoin1,/]Ith n Aa 8rshoucotthaarme]t map b e sI uS ev dcotrIontnauencofcoSnutrctoLn {< JO8 FILE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY {< . i : I i i I I I I ! I l i I S HQ.(E. i I I i : ,, I i i : i : : ij I i t I ! . ?-s- Di A /Z.e-,5n,o- 4/.-a /'/* <4 a?. -. [--o-*. ./,a/Z-a-? 4 4c .'-1- ;C J 4*oty',fr G tq -cc / rr'*zr' /"2 7 tJ-/-,'r' d.,-V*-'{* "z( a--/.i5/*4'*/a /'/--' fu,,:/ --/ .,ity of Burlingame Office of the City Attorney Code Enforcement Bureau 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, Catifornia 94010 (650) 558-7208, Fax: (650) 342-8386 November 6,2002 Mr. Edward Neizman 107 Highland Ave Burlingame, CA 94010 Sent via Certified Mail Dear Mr. Neizman Further to our telephone conversation that occurred yesterday, this letter it to confirm the fact that you have agreed to completely remove the illegal shed that has been constructed to the rear of your property by no later than Monday, November ll, 2002. As you are aware, the building departrnent had given you several deadlines to rOmove the shed the latest being November 4,2002. Your cooperation in this matter, by voluntarily complying with our requirements will negate the initiation of fuither code enforcement action. An inspection will be made of the structure on Tuesday, November 12,2002 and it is noted that you have given city officials permission to enter your property for this purpose. Sincerely, Alfred J. Palmer Code Enforcement Offi cer cc:City Attorney Building Department - Ted Oor.yang NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT ON DECEMBER 2,2002, AT 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE MATTER MAY BE HEARD, AT CITY HALL, 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, BURLINGAME CA, the City Council ofthe City ofBurlingame will hold a public hearing to determine whether the Real Property located at 107 HIGHLAND AVENUE, BURLINGAME, CA, constitutes a public nuisance and should be abated. In particular, the City Council will consider the following: A. An accessory structure has been built on the property without any construction permit as required. The structure is violation of the following sections of the California Building Code as adopted by the City: 106.21l30l .2.I - Construction of a storage shed over 1 20 square feet without a permit 503.2.1 - walls are not adequately fire resistant and are located on the property line 503.3 - insufficient separation between structures 1806.3 - the structure is not independently supported. B. The structure has been built in violation of section25.60.010 of the C\ty Zoning Code in that no variance or conditional use permit for a 220 square foot accessory structure of more than 120 square feet, height of more than 10 feet, and less than 4 feet form another structure has been approved or sought by the owner. Persons interested in the matter should review the staff report on the situation, which will be available from the City Clerk after 12 noon on November 27,20002, at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. The City Council will receive testimony on the matter from all interested persons who appear at the Council meeting. To provide written comments, interested persons should submit them to the City Clerk, located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, phone (650) 558-7203. For further information, contact the City of Burlingame Code Enforcement Officer at 650 - 558-7208. IF TFIE CITY COLINCIL DETERMINES THAT A PUBLIC NUISANCE EXISTS, TFM COLNCIL MAY AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO ABATE TFIE NUISANCE, INCLUDING AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, TFM CHIEF BLIILDING OFFICIAL, AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO TAKE SUCH STEPS AS NECESSARY TO ABATE THE NUISANCE IF FOLIND, INCLUDING COURT ORDERS, RECORDING NOTICE OF TI{E NUISANCE AGAINST TI-IE PROPERTY, PROVIDING FOR LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY FOR TFIE COSTS OF ABATEMENT EFFORTS, AND/OR ORDERTNG THE DEMOLITION OF TFIE STRUCTTIRE INVOLVED. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 8aITEM # MTG. DATE L2l2l02 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: November 21,2002 FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager 650-ss8-7222 SUBJECT: Membership in San Mateo County Telecommunications thority (SAMCAT) RECOMMENDATION: Discontinue Burlingame's Membership in this Joint Powers Authority, effective with the end of this fiscal year (June 30,200/.) 3 BACKGROUND: In the mid-1990's, the citybegan negotiations with TCI to renew the cable company's franchise agreement with the City. At that time, staff recommended the cityjoin the San Mateo County Telecommunications Authority (SAMCAT) to work jointly with other cities on franchise renewals. It turned out, however, that most of the SAMCAT members' franchise agreements expired later than Burlingame's. ln fact, their renewal negotiations are now underway. As a result, Burlingame retained a separate consultant to assist with the negotiations, and in 1998, the Council adopted the franchise agreement. Since i998, SAMCAT has embarked on establishment of Peninsula TV, to which we contribute over $20,000 per year, using public-educational-govemment reserves which come from a $0.42 per month assessment on cable subscribers. I have been unable to attend many meetings of SAMCAT because of the press or other work, and have found that our interests can be met without membership in the goup. We can choose to continue contributing to Peninsula TV without being a member of SAMCAT. In addition, if we wish to work jointly with other cities on a cable television matter, we can assemble a joint goup as needed. Since our cable franchise is on a different time frame than most other cities in the county-the current franchise with Comcast expires in 2008-we will probably be working by ourselves in any event. Finally, since the federal government has taken away much local authority in the cable TV area, a lot of effort goes for naught, as we discovered in the recent merger of AT&T and Comcast. This action is recommended at this time because SAMCAT requires a six-month notice if a member wishes to discontinue membership. The reduction is going to be in the first goup of suggested budget reductions now being drafted. BUDGET IMPACT: Discontinuing membership will reduce the 2003-04 Non-Department Budget by $3,000, and save approximately $3,500 in finance director time that can be devoted to higher priority work BY BY AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 12t2t o2STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Council DATE: November 1.2002 Larnr F.. Anderson Citv ttomev APPROVE ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR BY BY FROM: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Approve rotation list for Mayor and Vice Mayor for coming year. DISCUSSION: Resolution No. 117 (1999) sets forth the process for rotating the offrces of Mayor and Vice Mayor. Pursuant to that resolution, the rotation list is to be updated each year so that the rotation list is kept current. Attached are the rotation lists for November 20,2001(before the current rotation) and November 18, 2002 (the current rotation list). Attachment Rotation List Qriovember 20,2001, and November 18, 2002) 9a / 1 ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR (November 20,2001) Mayor Mary Janney Vice Mayor Mike Coffey Councilmember Rosalie O'Mahony Councilmember Joe Galligan (Immediate Past Mayor) Councilmember Cathy Baylock (Newly elected councilmember) 2. J. 4. 5. 1. 2 J. 4. 5. ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR (November 18,2002) Mayor Mike Coffey Vice Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony Councilmember Joe Galligan Councilmember Cathy Baylock Councilmember Mary Janney (Immediate Past Mayor) STAFF REPORT TO:HONORABLE MAYO AND CITY COT]NCIL SUBMITTED DATE:NOVEMRER 25.2 AGENDA 9bITEM # MTG. DATE 12.2.02 BY BY APPROVED FROM:CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON THE FY2OO2-2003 ADVANCED G PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: At Council's request, Planning staff is providing ongoing updates on the three advanced planning programs which are scheduled for FY 2002-2003. This is the second of the updates. BACKGROUND: The three advanced planning programs now underway are the preparation of the North End/Rollins Road Specific Area Plan, the update of the Bayfront Specific Area Plan, and the Housing Element Implementation Program. Public Meetings in December and January There are two upcoming workshops for the advanced planning programs. The public is invited to attend each of the workshops and to express their opinions and preferences regarding development, land use and land use densities, as well as the future appearance of these areas. City Council and Planning Commissioners are encouraged to attend and participate in these workshops which are an integral part of the programs. The purpose of the workshops is educational and your participation is not a violation of the Brown Act. Participation and observation of citizen input can provide unique insight into the choices made in preparing the draft plans. In December and January, we have scheduled the following workshops: North End/Rollins Road Specific Area Plan Third Workshop -Review Alternatives/Select Specific Planning Area Tuesday, December 3, 2002 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Burlingame Recreation Center Balzfront Specific Area Plan Update Second Workshop -Land Use Alternatives Tuesday, January 7,2003 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. DoubleTree Hotel There will be a fourth workshop scheduled for the North End/Rollins Road Specific Area planning program and a third workshop for the Bayfront Specific Area Plan update planning program in 2003. Status Report onthe FY 2002-2003 Advanced Planning Program December 2,2002 North End/Rollins Road Specific Area Plan The consulting firm of Design Community and Environment (DCE) has been contracted to undertake a study and prepare a Specific Area Plan document for City action. The contract includes conducting five public workshops. To date, two workshops have been held, one in September and one in October. The first two workshops were to go over the background technical data related to the specific plan area and to solicit input on goals and land use alternatives for the area. A copy of the Background Report was sent to each Planning Commissioner and Council member. The data collected is being used to help establish the parameters for what land uses and activities are feasible in the area. Based on the input from the first two workshops, the consultant has also prepared draft goals for the plan which we will continue to refine throughout the process. The third workshop, scheduled for December 3,2002, will focus on refining alternatives which the consultant developed based on the input received at the last two workshops. At this workshop, we will also be looking at the study area boundaries and selecting a Specific Plan planning area. Update of the Bayfront Specific Area Plan Planning staff is working in house on a review and update of the Bayfront Specific Area Plan adopted by the City Council in May, 1981 . The Council appointed a working group of interested citizens to assist staff as we compile and evaluate information gleaned at the public workshops. There have been two meetings of the working group, and meetings will continue monthly throughout the planning program. The next one is schedule for Thursday, January 23,2003. The first workshop was held to review the information contained in the Background Report for the Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan update. This report includes information on existing conditions which have the potential to affect development in the area. The background report was distributed to City Council members, Planning Commissioners and Working Group members, as well as to participants of the first workshop. At the workshop, groups reviewed the existing goals for the area, and gave input about the existing attributes of the area andpotential future uses. A feedback report was prepared and distributed to workshop participants and to Council members and Planning Commissioners. At the second workshop, to be held January 7,2003, participants will give input into land use alternatives for the area. Meeting participants will break into groups and will be given maps and colored pens to express ideas about appropriate land uses and the future appearance of the area. The groups will begin to narrow and identiff the Specific Area planning area. All of the workshops for both programs were widely noticed in the newspapers, in the chamber newsletter and by mail. The noticing lists were developed using the list of participants in the Housing Element workshops, all property owners within each planning area, and anyone who has expressed interest. Advertisements were placed in the San Mateo Times and the Independent a week before the meetings, and the notices were posted on the City's web site, as well as sent via e-mail to the City's list serve customers. There were 30 to 40 people in attendance at each of the workshops. Housing Element Implementation Program The Planning Commission appointed a subcommittee to work with staff to develop the zoning changes required to implement the work program outlined in the adopted Housing Element as certified by the State in September,2002. The subcommittee has been meeting monthly. At the October and November meetings, the subcommiffee reviewed proposed revisions to the condominium and condominium conversion requirements. Staff is working on consolidating the comments made and will bring a draft of the revised regulations to the Planning Commission in January or February, providing there is space on the agenda. -2- Status Report on the FY 2002-2003 Advanced Planning Program December 2,2002 The subcommittee also developed a list of priorities for the housing element work program, with incentives for affordable housing (inclusion, standard reduction) and transportation access alternatives as the highest priorities. The subcommittee also began their discussions on standards for inclusionary zoning. Staff was asked do research on what other cities are doing in the way of standards and incentives. The subcommittee will continue their discussions on inclusionary zoning at their next meeting to be held in January. S:\CityCouncilMemos\Planning Program Update I 2.2.02.doc -J- .,1 TO: DATE: STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 12t02tO2 9c HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED\ November 20, 2OO2 BY FRoM: PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT WI METROPCS INC. FOR A TELEPHONE CONDU!T INSTALLATION WITHIN THE SKYVIEW WATER RESERVOIR SITE, 1321 SKYVIEW DRIVE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a license agreement with METROPCS Inc. for an underground telephone conduit and wires within the City's Skyview Reservoir site at 1321 Skyview Drive. The license agreement stipulates an annual license fee of $1000. BACKGROUND: METROPCS, a mobile telecommunications carrier, is installing a mobile telephone cell site on a PG&E tower. The tower is in the jurisdiction of the County of San Mateo and is in the San Francisco PUC (SFPUC) watershed near Burlingame's Skyview Water Reservoir site. This installation has received all required governmental approvals. The nearest telephone service point is a joint use utility pole located in the southwest corner of the reservoir site. METROPCS Inc. is requesting that a conduit and wires be placed from a service point on the pole and then undergrounded from the pole into the adjacent SFPUC property, a distance of less than 10 feet. The license agreement includes the stipulation that there be an annual license fee of $1000 and that an encroachment permit be obtained for any work on the site including maintenance. There is also a removal and relocation provision in the agreement for City needs. The installation does not impede any nonnal City operation of the site. BUDGET IMPACTS: City will receive an annual license fee of $1000. All other City costs will be recovered as a part of encroachment permit issuance. EXHIBITS: Resolution, License Agteement, Map Frank C. Erbacher Assistant Director of Public Works r c: City Clerk, METROPCS S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Repons[vletro PCS LicenseAgree-Skyview Res-1321 Skyview.wpd \-, RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COTINCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH METROPCS, INC. FOR INSTALLATION AND USE OF T]I\IDERGROUND CONDUIT AT 1321 SKYVIEW DRIVE, BURLINGAME (RESERVOIR LOT) RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, MetroPCS, Inc. is a mobile telecommunications carrier with an approved certificate of public convenience and necessity from the California Public Utilities Commission, that has obtained approval for a communications tower on City and County of San Francisco property near Interstate 280; and WHEREAS, in order to provide that service, MetroPCS r. st run a conduit from an existing telephone service to the tower, and such a conduit would cross City property at 1321 Skyview Drive; and WHEREAS, mobile telecommunications service is an important element of life in the San Francisco Bay Area, MetroPCS is willing to provide the necessary assurances and covenants so that the installation will not interfere in the use of the property by the City, and the License Agreement provides for the removal or relocation of the conduit should the needs of the City require such action in the future, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: l. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the License Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the City Manager MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of -r 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COIINCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COI.INCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL November 21,2002 PUBLIC WORKS RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT TO CONTROL AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE 12tO2lO2 9d TO: DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY BY G COMPAI.IY FOR PHASE I OF TIIE CITYWIDE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQINSITION SYSTEM DESIGN/BUILD INTEGRATION PROJECT (SCADA) _ CITY PROJECT NO. 9940 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding the first phase of the Citywide SCADA System Project to Control Manufacturing Company, Napa, California, in the amount of $973,336. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has various generations of control systems for water distribution and storage facilities as well as storm drain and sewer pump stations. These systems have become difficult to maintain and operate due to age and incompatibility. In order to assure reliable and efficient operation of these pumps, especially during storm events, staff developed a master plan and specifications to guide the design, equipment procurement, software development and installation of an integrated SCADA System. DISCUSSION: In August 2002, Request for Proposals were issued to firms for design, procurement of hardware and software equipment, construction, start up and training of Phase I of the SCADA System. This includes a central control center, telemetry (radio) system, and the major operational stations within the City's water, sewer and storm drain facilities. Five proposals were received, and each of the firms was interviewed. Based on the interviews and the written proposals, staff selected Control Manufacturing Company as the most qualified to complete the project. Control Manufacturing Company, a design/build SCADA Integration company, has met all the requirements for the project, and has a past history of satisfactory work for the City and many other public agencies. Phase I work includes the 19 most critical facilities. Staff will return to Council in FY 2003-04 for approval of a contract to complete the remaining 15 facilities. EXHIBIT: Resolution, Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: The estimated project costs:The available CIP funding: Design and construction $ 973,336 Contingencies 97,334 Staff Administration and Inspections 136.330 $1,207,000 Sewer Fund Water Fund General Fund (For storm drain facilities) $ 475,000 $ 400,000 $ 332.000 $1,207,000 E)r,*qEdl-L,r & Doug Be[, P..Er) Senior Civil Engineer -J r (6s0) ss8-7230 c: City Clerk, Finance, Control Manufacturing Group S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\scada9940.stf.wpd RESOLI NO. AWARDING CONTRACT TO PROVIDE THE CITY WIDE SCADA SYSTEM DESIGN/BUILD INTEGRATION PROJECT TO CONTROL MANUFACTURING COMPANY CITY PROJECT NO. 9940 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT 9940 - CONTROL MANUFACTURIW WHEREAS, on OCTOBER 21, 2002, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, CONTROL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of $973,336. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED thAt thE bid Of CONTROL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, for said project in the amount of $973,336, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: s: \apublicworlsdir\prcjcrs\resolutionaward City Clerk STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL November 2L2W2 AGENDA 9eITEM # MTG. DATE Lzl2l02 TO:aBY DATE: FRoM: Parks & Recreation Director (558-7307)BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT TO CSB TRUCTION,INC. TO PROVIDE RESTROOM MODIFICATIONS AT RAY PARK AND CUERNAVACA PARK _ CITY PROJECT NO. 80560 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding the subject work to CSB Construction, Inc. of Walnut Creek, Califomia in the amount of $241,087.00 BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame has public restrooms at several of its parks. Some of the existing restrooms are in need of upgrades that involve regulatory compliance, functionality, and aesthetic considerations. The restrooms at Ray Park and Cuernavaca Park are cinderblock buildings dating from the late 1960s/early 1970s. The restrooms serve the needs of both casual park users and sports teams. In October 2002 a Request for Proposal was issued by Public Works to 34 firms for the design and construction of the restroom modifications as well as the addition of a storage building adjacent to the restroom at Ray Park. Two proposals were received, and each of the two firms was interviewed by Public Works and Parks Division staff. The selection criteria included the quality of the proposed work plan, the proposed schedule, and the proposed price. Based on the interviews and the written proposals, staffselected CSB Construction, Inc. as the most qualified to complete the project. CSB presented a far more comprehensive proposal with greater attention to schedule, detail, finished product, and engineering problems. The firm's resume includes a wide variety of private and public projects. It is estimated that the project will be completed by the end of April 2003. Portable restrooms will be in place during construction EXHIBITS: Agreement with Exhibit A, Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: The City of Burlingame applied for and was approved for funding of $268,000.00 under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. The Burlingame Girls Softball Association (BGSA) has also agreed to fund a portion of the cost of the storage facility at Ray Park. Upon Council approval, staffwill obtain approval for funding of this project from the Bond administrator. The project budget will be: Design and construction Contingencies Materials $241,087 20,000 _ 6.000 $267,087 There are adequate funds in the City's Bond allocation to complete the project. There will be no impact on the General Fund. Presuming a modest contribution from BGSA, the pro-ject will be well funded. Back up funding is also available from a Roberti-Z'berg-Harris bond allocation, which is currently projected for other future park improvement projects. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AWARDING CONTRACT TO CSB CONSTRUCTION,INC. TO DESIGN AND BUILD RENOVATIONS TO THE RESTROOMS AT CUERNAVACA AND RAY PARKS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City wishes to renovate and improve the restrooms at Cuernavaca and Ray Parks, which are two important City parks; and WHEREAS, on May 6,2002, by ResolutionNo. 45-2002, the City Council authorized application to the State of California for grant funds under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and WHEREAS, following the City's application, the State has allocated funds for appropriate City projects; and WHEREAS, the City prepared and duly noticed a Request for Proposals for the renovation and improvement of the restroom facilities at Cuernavaca and Ray Parks, because the improvements needed allowed for a variety of solutions dependent on the type of building, construction techniques, and accompanying improvements for the sites, most of which would largely consist of installation of components rather than heavy construction; and WHEREAS, the design/build option for this type of small facility provided the City and the public with a way of evaluating those different approaches and solutions without being bound to a lowest bid, which would not give the best value for the projects; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals for the projects and following review and interviews of the submitting contractors, CSB Construction, Inc.submitted the best planned, most cost-effective, and best qualified proposal at a reasonable price; and WHEREAS, Cuernavaca Park is important open space serving the needs of the Mills Estate community; and WHER-EAS, Ray Park is important open space serving the needs of the Ray Park community as well as providing recreational facilities for both schools and community; and WHEREAS, award of this contract and the improvements will greatly benefit the community, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 2. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. MAYOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certifr that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the -day of .2002, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COLTNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 l. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A with CSB Construction, Inc. to design and build renovations and improvements to the restrooms at Cuernavaca and Ray Parks. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND CSB CONSTRUCTION.INC. RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS AT CUERNAVACA AND RAY PARKS, BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA CITY PROJECT NO. 80560 THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California on _, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and CSB CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter called "Contractor," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorizethe design and construction of the public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly published for proposals for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, on December 2,2002, after notice duly given, the City Council of the City of Burlingame awarded the contract for the design and construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which the Council found to have submitted the most complete, cost-effective and qualifred proposal for these improvements; and WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the design and construction of these improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. Contractor shall perform the work that is very generally described in those Specifications entitled Restroom Modifications at Ray Park and Cuernavaca Park, City Project No. 80560 and as conceived and amplified in the Proposal submitted by Contractor dated October 29,2002, and as revised 1111912002 md 1112612002. 1 2. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement, Request for Proposal, the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this project by State law, the accepted Proposal as revised, the complete plans, profiles, detailed drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents. All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. 3. Contract Price. The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above agreed to be done, the sum not to exceed of Two hundred forty-one thousand eighty-sevqn dollars ($241,087.00). In the event authorized work is performed or materials fumished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Proposal and the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained, if any, or pursuant to written agreement between the parties if not so provided. The Contract Price amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents. 4. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. 5. Notices. All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 9 40 | 0 2 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows CSB CONSTRUCTION,INC. 38 Quail Court, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, CA94596 6. Funding by State of California. a. Contractor understands that the majority of the funding for this Agreement will be coming from the State of California from bond funds that have been issued by the State. The City has been allocated funds from the State for these types of improvements, and the City is submitting applications for funding of these specific projects that have to be based on the award of this Agreement. The City will not issue a notice to proceed until the City's application is approved for at least one of the two locations involved in this Agreement. The City also intends to submit an application to the State for an advance of the State funding when the City issues its notice to proceed to Contractor. However, the financial condition of the State is such that the funding from the State may not occur or may be delayed. b. Contractor agrees that the City may suspend or terminate this Agreement should the State delay or refuse funding for the Project. i. If the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this section, City agrees that it will pay Contractor for the actual costs incurred by the Contractor for general conditions and engineering up to the date of the notice of termination, but not to exceed a total of $47,495 as generally shown on the Contractor's updated proposal dated 1112612002; this payment will be based on documented hours. All drawings, reports, and supportive data prepared by the Contractor regarding this Project to the date of termination are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City at the City's written request. The City acknowledges that the drawings, reports, and data to be prepared by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of developing a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the materials prepared by the Contractor in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Contractor expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or J technique of Contractor which is and has been confirmed in writing by Contractor to be a trade secret of Contractor. ii. If the funding is delayed, Contractor and City will meet and agree on a written change order to account for any delay costs that the Contractor can demonstrate have been caused by the delay. c. In addition, if the City's application for only one of the two locations is approved and the other is denied, Contractor agrees that the City may reduce the scope of the Agreement to encompass only the one location that has been approved by the State for funding, and the not-to- exceed amount under this Agreement will be reduced by the amount allocated for the Construction at the location as shown on the revisions to the Contractor's Proposal dated 1112612002 that is disapproved. 7. Insurance Contractor does not possess professional engineers liability insurance and the requirement for such insurance is waived by the City. 8. Interpretation. As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and vice versa. 9. Waiver or Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of six (6) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF BURLINGAME, A Municipal Corporation csB CONSTRUCTION, INC., A California Corporation 4 Rv Rw ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to form City Attorney 5 STAFF REPORT AGENDA 9fITEM # MTG. DATE r2l2l02 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: November 21r2002 FRoM: Rahn Becker, Assistant City Manager 6s0-558-7222 SUBJECT: Resolution Establishing General Fund Reserves for RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution. BACKGROUND: This resolution directs the changes in reserves presented in the 2002-03 Adopted Budget approved by Council in June. Changes to reserves require a resolution. These changes: 1. Move $325,000 from the PERS Reserve for the 2002-03 City costs of Police Safety retirement. 2. Move all$912,000 of the Employee Recognition Program Reserve to fund 2002-03 salary increases" 3. Establish the Catastrophic Events Reserve at $2,000,000. 4. Fund the 2002-03 Contingency Reserve at $500,000. 5. Adjust the Economic Stability Reserve to enact the above changes. Any additional fund balance above these amounts will flow to the Undesignated Fund Balance during the year, and a resolution adjusting the reserves willbe presented after final2002-03 financial statements are prepared. ATTACHMENTS : Resolution BY BY APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING THE RESERVE FUNDS AND REVISING THEIR FUNDING AND USAGE RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, on June 18, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 57-2001, establishing internal and reserve funds and the general policies governing their funding and usage; and WHEREAS, as part of the implementation of the 2002-2003 adopted budget and to meet the contingencies expected in the coming year, it is necessary to restructure the General Reserve Fund and divide into two Reserve Funds, the Catastrophic Events Reserve and the Economic Stability Reserve and to properly assign funding to each fund; and WHEREAS, $325,000 must be transferred from the PERS Retirement Contribution Reserve Fund to fund the Police Safety retirement costs for this year; and WHEREAS, the economic circumstances of the City requires the transfer of all monies in the Employee Recognition Program Reserve to the General Fund, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The two new reserve funds described in Exhibit A are approved and the General Reserve is abolished. 2. The following funding levels are established for the reserve funds for the 2002-2003 fiscal year: PERS Retirement Contribution Reserve: Catastrophic Events Reserve: Economic Stability Reserve : Contingency Reserve: Employee Recognition Program Reserve : $3,300,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $ 500,000 $o I MAYOR t I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Btulingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of _ 2001, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 EXHIBIT A RESERW FANDS A. PER.S Retirement Contribution Reserve This reserve may be adjusted from time to time based on PERS actuarial estimates and may be used to fund appropriation increases necessary to pay PERS employer costs. B. Catastrophic Events Reserve A designated general reserve to set aside funds for extraordinary emergencies, such as disasters or wars, that either extend over a period of time or that are catastrophic. C. Economic Stability Reserve A designated general reserve to set aside funds for the fluctuations in revenues and expenditures caused by economic turbulence or uncertainty. D. Contingency Reserve A designated reserve for unbudgeted contingencies. E. Performance Recognition Program Reserve A designated reserve equal to 5o/o of total salaries to fund perforTnance recognition programs for City employees. A-1 r J' $3,346,152.96 Ck. No. 85577 - 86195 Excludes Library Cks. 85577 - 85620 RECOMMENDED FORPAYMENT APPROVED FORPAYMENT Payroll for October 2002 $1,705,299.86 Ck. No. 151078 - 151504 Ck. No's 151076, 151077 are voids *EFTS for October 2002 $426,821.57 -ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS EFT'S INCLUDE: State Withholding SDI (State DisabilitY) PERS- Health Benefits Retirement Agendalten4T.' Meeting Date l,\l A/ 0 L / J. i: ,l a 11-07 -?002 NAME GENERAL FUND CAP I TAL I I,lPROVEMENTS FUNO WATER FUND SEI,IER FUND SOLID I,JASTE FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUIPI',IENT SERVICES FUND INFORMATION SERVICES FUND FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AND AGENCY FUND STATE GRANTS FUND UTILITY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL FOR APPROVAL C I TY OF BURL I NGAI..IEI.'ARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP. 02'03 PAGE 11 AMOUNT ,675.07 ,320.39 ,437.53 ,189.44 ,438.18 ,373.60 ,91?.33 ,180.42 FUND 101 320 526 527 528 5?9 618 619 620 621 6?5 731 731 896 87,361.80 1 04 , 028.33 11 ,38?.86 3,146.10 2,789.31 22 12 15 20 1 1 40 ,l 5,658.'.12 $329, 893 . 48 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO I NCLUS I VE , THE AMOUNT OFFICIALS, ACCORDANCE CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 85069 THROUGH 86195 INCLUSIVE,IOTALING IN OF $329,893.48, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN tlITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT DATECOUNC I L .../ .../ ... DATE NUI,4BER NAI,IE 86193 86191 86195 TOTAL CI IY OF BURLINGAIIE IIA R R A N T R E G I S T E R 11/07 /02 VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand L,ritten Checks PAGE 'IO AMOUNT 300.00 17,570,00 2,154 .05 s329,893.48 PACI FIC SURFACING DEPOSIT REFUNDS TRI STATE METER CAPI TAL EOUIPHENT PRISON INDUSTRY AUTIIORITY M I SCELLA}']EOUS 24026 240?8 24029 ACCOUNT 500.00 731 22520 17,570.00 320 80480 8oo 2,454.05 101 65200 400 I VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand lJritten Checks ACCOUNT PAEE 9 AItlOUNT 966 _93 5,685.29 101.35 320.00 340,00 9.64 285 .s5 10,352.86 484.50 ,70.00 I ,170.00 192.44 NUMBER NAI,IE 86180 86181 86182 86183 86181 86185 86t86 86187 UBS 86188 86189 86190 86191 KEITH ITIARTIN TRAVEL & I4EETINGS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES TRAVEL & MEETINGS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 66210 69020 69020 66520 61160 15000 250 120 250 120 120 5150 THE MARLIII COI.IPANY TRAII.IIIIG EXPENSE TRAII'III'IG EXPENSE TRAINII'IG EXPENSE PACI FIC BELL/UORLDCOII1 col,it4uN I cAT t0Ns UTI LI TY EXPENSE I,4ELISSA GINSEERG CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CHERI NICHOL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AT&I t,JI RELESS EOUIPI'!ENT cor,ft,iuN I cAT I0Ns NEXTEL COI4MUN I CAT IONS co llut{ IcAT I0Ns 443.47 211.74 241 .72 101 66240 260 526 69020 264 527 66520 260 TOM GI L LI.IAN M I SCELLANEOUS KELLY I.ICCOVERN M I SCELLANEOUS I,'ASTE MANAGEI.IENT OF TRAI N I NG EXPEIISE 5,658.12 101 65100 160 896 20281 101 5?6 5?6 527 619 6?0 320.00 101 68010 220 1646 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 9.64 101 61250 160 285.55 101 68020 160 2200 484.50 101 68010 220 '1661 570.00 731 22546 1,470.00 731 22546 192.84 101 65200 260 23712 23728 23744 23877 23901 23919 21946 23951 21021 24023 24021 10 53 00 57 00 81 83 2 0 7 7 42 910 3699 I.I I SC. SUPPLIES PROTESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S CONIRACTUAL SERVICES 76 80 30 619 64460 120 5110 619 61160 210 5180 619 64460 220 5180 ANDREU STEBEINS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46192 EASTERN PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION M I SCELLANEOUS 24025 1,000,00 751 ?2546 1,000.00 C] TY OF BURIINGAI.4EI,IARRANT REGISTER 11t07 /02 24022 CI TY OF BURLINGAI.iE L'ARRAIIT REGI STER 11/07 /02 VENDOR OETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand l.iritten Checks ACCOUNT PAGE 8 AI'1OUNT 481.14 190.00 49 .00 340.00 8,910. 00 11.60 444 .50 88.00 720.80 15,000.00 458.00 1 ,234.05 1,450.00 NUI,4BER NAME 86165 86166 86167 86168 86169 86170 46171 86172 86173 86174 46178 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 OFF I CE EXPENSE KELLY VENEZIA CO}iTRACTUAL SERVICES II{AGISTICS INTERNATIONAL OFFICE EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES THE MOSILE STORAGE GROUP BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. AT&T I/IREIESS cot'lfiuN I cAT I0Ns I]ADINE RONSOTI COTITRACTUAL SERVICES CYBERTIET CONSULT I IIG, INC. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S KAREII SCHElKOUITZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES DEAN CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S OIANE CAUGHLAN COIITRACTUAL SERVICES KATHLEEN OORE PROPERTIES RENTS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES 190.00 526 69020 190 49.00 101 65200 160 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 8,910.00 32O 79400 210 11.60 101 65200 110 484.50 101 68010 220 1661 88.00 101 68010 220 1661 720.80 101 68010 ?20 1762 15,000.00 320 80200 210 458.00 618 64520 234 100.00 101 68010 220 1660 1,231.05 101 68010 120 1101 101 65100'110 'I01 65100 220 725 725 526 69020 180 527 66520 180 22924 23169 23195 ?3231 23320 23507 23512 23567 23590 236?2 00 192 292 23538 46175 TIILLS PENINSULA EMERGENCY MED,IN 23548 M I SCELLAI.IEOUS 86176 00 00 86179 AT&T cofifiuN I cAT I0 s 23661 4,26 621 61450 160 4.26 23138 86177 PC tlALL I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 100.00 CI TY OF BURL INGAI.IEI,/ARRANT REGISTER 11/07 /02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hahd Uritten Checks PAGE 7 AMOUNT 1 ,288.91 4,925.00 2,243.45 22,500.00 240.00 3?.62 109.33 45.54 160.00 784.00 300.00 17 ,557.33 756.00 NUMBER NAME 86151 86152 86153 86154 86155 86156 86157 86158 86159 86161 86162 86163 86161 MA}'IDEGO, I NC. MISC, SUPPLIES BIBB AND ASSOC IATES, INC. PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S A&LJANITORIALSERVICE PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES VB GOLF LLC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ROBERTS AND BRUNE ItI I SC, SUPPL I ES HELENE RENE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CUTIERS EOGE FIRE APPARATUS UAINT- DUNCAN PRINTING OTT I CE EXPENSE VERIZON I,'IRELESS co tiuNI cAT I0 s IIlI LLS PENIIISULA HEALTH SERVICES I,{ I SCELLAIIEOUS ROBERTA RESTANI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PEIIINSULA FORO OF SAN BRUNO CAPITAL EAUIPi4ENT iIARTY SPRINGER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2185 5 21863 21936 21944 2217a 22366 22107 22541 22593 22672 zzn1 22828 22894 ?2916 ACCOUNT 1,288.91 101 68010 120 1787 4,925.00 320 80510 210 619 61460 210 5190 619 64460 2?0 5190 22,500.00 529 68030 220 177.32 5?7 66520 120 240.00 101 58010 220 1660 32.62 101 65200 203 109.33 621 61450 110 t-5.51 '10',t 68010 160 1100 150,00 101 68010 220 1661 784,00 618 61520 234 500.00 101 6a010 220 1341 17,557.33 620 66700 800 756.00 101 68010 220 1660 177 .32 83.35 2,160.50 86160 ROBERTA TAVAKE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NUMBER NAII1E 86135 86136 86138 86139 86140 46142 86145 86144 a6115 a6116 86147 86149 PORTOSAN RENTS & LEASES CITY OF BURLINGAI{E I'ARRANT REGI STER 11/07 /02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l,Jritteh Checks PAGE 6 Ali4OUNT 1 ,233,A2 660.00 97 ,50 386.99 10,275.09 52.838.35 350.00 600.00 444.64 400.00 250.00 1 ,600.00 90.77 300.00 ARLETTE PETERSON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86137 PAUL ROSS !/ALLACH CONTRACIUAL SERVICES AFFINITEL COHI1UNICATIONS COMMUN I CAT IONS SPORTS CHOICE I,4I SC, SUPPLIES H.V. CARTER CO., INC. CAPI TAL €AUIPi4E I I4I KE EROU/N ELECTRIC CO. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RENEE RAI'ISEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OUICK MIX CONCRETE S IDEWALK REPAI R EXPENSE PEEK TRAFFIC PROFESS I ONAL & SPECIALIZED S MI CHAEL ELLI NGSON COTITRACTUAL SERVICES JACKI E COOPER CONIRACTUAL SERVICES IILTERFRESH COFFEE EXCELLEI'ICE BLD6. & GROUNDS MAINT. 861/+8 HON I CA EHLERS COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES ACCOUNT 1,233.82 621 64450 160 660.00 101 68010 220 1349 97.50 101 68010 220 1660 386.99 101 680',I0 120 1787 10,275.09 10't 68020 800 2200 52,838.36 320 7910? 220 350,00 731 22546 600.00 101 580'10 220 1331 111.61 101 66210 219 400.00 101 66240 210 250,00 101 68010 220 ',1780 1,600.00 101 68010 220 1616 90.77 621 64450 190 300.00 101 68010 220 1661 175.07 529 68030 180 2200 ?0246 20547 20752 20a45 20876 20a94 20919 21110 21317 21432 21469 ?1623 86150 CI NGULAR !,IRELESS COI,4MUN ICAT IONS 21747 99.41 101 65300 160 99.44 86141 HOI]ARO ATKINS MI SCELLANEOUS 21136 21627 ?1656 173 .07 NUMBER NAME CITY OF BURLINGAMEI.'ARRANT REGISTER 11 /07 /02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand t",ritten Checks 10't 65200 203 625 65?13 203 PAGE 5 AMOUNT 853.59 363.50 204. 00 1 00. 00 I ,710.29 1,984.50 340.00 52.92 44.89 65 .50 1 ,650 . 50 4, 036. 00 270. 00 265.00 86120 HI.TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 17546 86121 SAV-ON PRINTING MISCELLANEOUS 17946 86122 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION DUES & SUESCRIPTIONS 18321 86123 LINDA LENORE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18729 861?4 DEANIS AUTO BODY & M I SCELLANEOUS 18795 861?5 NATURCLEAN MISC. SUPPLIES 18830 86126 PEGGY GUARALDI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19044 86127 ANG NEI,JSPAPERS PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 1 9083 86128 AMBIANCE FLORAL STUDIO MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1 9205 861?9 BURTONIS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 19366 86130 LIILSEY & HAM PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19397 86131 POWER I.JASH I NG SERVI CE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19564 86132 CIUCCI CONSULIING GROUP INC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19791 86133 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINE 19821 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 86134 EL CAIIINO CHARTER LINES INC tllSC. SUPPLIES ACCOUNT 853.59 625 65213 203 363.50 731 22574 204.00 101 56100 240 100.00 101 68010 220 1660 1,710.?9 618 64520 604 1,984.50 527 66520 120 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 52.92 101 64200 150 44.89 101 64100 290 41 .76 23.74 1,650.50 320 80600 210 4,036.00 101 66210 210 270.00 101 65300 220 ?65.00 101 66100 240 201 05 402.93 101 68010 120 15?1 402.93 CITY OF BURLINGAI4EI.IARRAIIT REGISTER 11/07 /02 VENDOR OETAIL '*r Denotes Hand t/ritten Checks 1,118.65 1 ,278,23 545.24 '11 .80 182,71 60't .06 87.83 120,00 '190.00 1 ,?77 .00 170.2A 731.17 911.46 PAGE 4 A'4OUNT 7 ,468.12 1,241.16 4,653.00 1,180.42 3,369.02 1 ,133.59 21.89 36,671.12 607.50 ACCOUNTNUI'I8ER NAME 86109 86110 86111 861 ',I3 86115 861 16 46117 861 18 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT OFF I CE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES UNITORMS AND EOUIPI.IENI COMI4UII I CAT IONS BLD6. & GROUNDS I'1AI NT. EOUIPHENT MAI NT. GAS, OIL & GREASE CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES TRAVEL & MEETINGS TRAI N I NG EXPENSE PRISONER EXPENSE POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE lr r scELLA Eous I,4I SC. SUPPLIES '.1I SCELLANEOUS I NVENSYS I.IETERING SYSTEIIS I,iI SC. SUPPLIES OEIIEY PEST CONTROL RAT Co},|TROL PRoGRAI,| AAA EUSINESS MACHINES MI SCELLANEOUS VALLEY OIL CO. SUPPT IES SYONEY I'IALKOO SI.IALL TOOLS L IIIHART PETERSEN POI,/ERS ASSOC. MI SCELLAIIEOTJS KATHY D€JESUS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13720 11144 11338 15196 '15595 15764 16317 16696 27 .68 184.71 1,281.16 320 76010 l20 4,653.00 10',1 66210 Z1A 480.00 101 68010 220 1648 1,180.42 731 65195 400 3,369.02 101 65100 220 1,133.59 620 ',I5000 24-49 620 6670A 130 36,674.12 731 22515 607.50 101 68010 220 1644 861 19 STANOARD RECISTER OFF I CE EXPENSE 17495 1,372,99 101 61250 110 1 ,372.99 480.00 15352 16599 101 65100 110 101 65100 ',r20 101 65100 140 101 65100 160 101 65100'190 10't 65100 200 101 65100 201 101 65100 220 101 65100 250 101 65100 250 101 65100 291 101 65100 292 101 65100 703 320 78330 120 731 22574 46112 JUDY P I SAI'IO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86111 ALL CI TY I'IANAGEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CI TY OF BURLINGATTE TIARRANT REG I STER 11/07/0? VENDOR OETAI Li*rDenotes tland l.,ritten Checks PAGE 3 NUIIIBER NAII{E 86100 86101 86',t02 86103 86101 86105 86106 86107 86108 ALERT DoOR SERVICE, INC, 10059 PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S ACCOUNT 210.00 619 64460 210 5150 509.53 101 65200 11',I A}IOUNT 210.00 509.53 1,083.30 836.08 108.25 267 .87 1,995.58 CAL. STEAT'I MISC. SUPPLIES TRAIT I C CONTROL I.{ATERIALS PROfESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S II I SC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES MI SC. SUPPLIES 66210 66210 79400 69020 66520 61160 120 222 210 120 120 120 5120 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC I'i I SC. SUPPLIES PIP PRINTING POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE OOROTHY OIGRADY t'I I SC. SUPPLIES MEYERS, NAVE, R I8ACK, SILVER PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ROI,4EO PACKING CO MISC. SUPPLIES 10256 10557 11020 11 101 11348 11568 43.48 46.17 683.14 I 10. 14 6,75 193.62 101 101 320 526 5?7 619 836.08 101 65100 292 108.25 101 66?10 120 267.a7 320 A0200 210 530.43 101 68020 120 2200 CIIIEF BI tL REILLY OFFICE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES RADIO UAINT. TRAI N I NG EXPENSE 12 1 ,33 96 39 20 03 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 110 120 205 260 65 200 65200 65200 65200 I NTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEI,4 FIRE APPARATUS I'IAI NT.496,27 625 65213 203 10620 530.43 496.27'13689 CI TY OF BURLINGAI'IE I,IARRAt'IT REGI STER 11/07 /02 VENDOR DETAI tr*r oenotes Hand !,lritten checks 101 65400 400 320 75110 120 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 31.61 216.75 729.75 416.25 2,090.50 10,549.91 415.63 206.76 596.39 528.00 46.91 1 ,536.00 9,368. 10 NUI4BER NAI'IE 86085 86086 86087 86088 86089 86090 86091 86093 86094 86096 86097 86098 86092 ALLSTAR FIRE EOUIPMENT, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES PERSONAL AI]ARDS, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES SAIIDRA POBE CO}.ITRACTUAL SERVICES MARGARET PRE}.IDERGAST CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DOROTIIY RADYK CONIRACTUAL SERVICES INFORI.IATION SERVI CES DEPT. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONI,iENTAL PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S MISC. SUPPLIES UEST GROIJP PAYMENT CTR. [I I SC. SUPPLIES tIFE ASSIST SUPPL I ES SAN I.IATEO COUIITY SHERITFIS OFC. PR I SONER EXPENSE ABAG - LIABILITY PROFESSIONAL & SPECI AL I ZED S CLAIt.IS PAYMENTS ACCOUNT 31.64 101 68010 120 1521 216-75 101 68010 220 16/+6 729.75 101 68010 220 1641 416.25 10',1 68010 220 1644 2,090.50 '101 65150 220 10,060.41 489.50 526 69020 210 620 66700 120 127.74 101 65200 111 206.76 ! 0't 64350 120 SERVI CE UNL I MITED II,IC. BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. CONTRACTUAL SEiVICES 215 .63 200.00 101 65100 190 101 65100 220 05145 03175 03179 03378 03380 03551 03938 03961 09248 09358 09433 09518 3,848.50 5,519.50 POM INC. MI SCELLANEOUS }.I I SC. SUPPLIES 86095 ENTERTAINMENT PUELICATIONS, INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 528.00 101 68010 220 1212 16.91 101 65200 112 1,516.00 101 65100 291 618 61520 210 618 64520 601 86099 ANA FITZGERALD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 09975 150.00 101 68010 220 1646 160.00 153.77 03235 127.74 09392 NUMBER NA}"IE 86070 46071 86072 860rJ 86074 8607s 86076 86077 86078 a6079 86080 86081 86082 86083 CITY OF BURLINGAMEI./ARRANT REGISTER 11/07/0? VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand l.Jritten Checks 101 65200 140 10'l 65200 203 PAGE'] AMOUNT 432.00 57 .87 1 ,667.62 443.00 2,301 .63 2,855.00 575 .89 444.89 300.00 51.71 30.79 2,7A9.31 220.09 40'1.10 1 ,198.23 86069 * U S POSTAL SERVICE i4I SC. SUPPLIES 6RAY I S PAINT, BURLINGAUE I.4I SC. SUPPLIES ACTION CLEANING SERVI CE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES AMIECII ELEVATOR SERVICES CONIRACIUAL SERVICES BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMI.IERCE CHAMBER OF COIII,IERCE PMT. BURLINGAME RECREAT ION DEPT. RECREATION EXPENSES GCS I,]ESTERN POIIER & SUPPLIES L. N. CURTIS & SONS UNI FORI.IS AND EOUIPT.IENT FIRE APPARA'IUS MAINT. U/ACEK DENNAOUI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DICTAPHONE CORPORATION OFF I CE EXPENSE !/. !/. GRAINGER, INC. SI.IALL TOOLS HARDING ESE, INC. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S 03821 01025 01030 01078 0\637 01663 01857 0?027 02044 0?057 0??48 o2365 02645 02755 02819 ACCOUNT 432.00 320 79160 120 57.87 619 64460 120 5110 1,667.62 619 61160 220 5130 443.00 619 61160 220 5110 2,301.63 101 64530 151 57r.49 6?0 15000 365.25 K & L' DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP MISC. SUPPLIES LAIISON PRODUCTS, I C. SUPPLIES }IANPOIJER TE[IPORARY EI'lPLOYMENT SVC. 79.64 300.00 101 68010 220't341 54.71 101 64200 110 30.79 619 61160 130 2,7a9.31 528 66600 210 220 -O9 619 61160 120 5210 40't.10 620 15000 1,19a.23 101 65300 011 86084 P. G. & E. GAS & ELECTRIC 03051 19,895,04 101 66240 170 19,895.01 2,855.00 101 10700 10-31-2002 CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E 11 ARRANT REG I STER FUND RECAP . 02-03 PAGE 8 AHOUNTNAI,4E FUND 101 320 326 327 526 527 529 618 619 620 B1 896 48 478 92 5 201 253 GENERAL FUNO CAPITAL II.4PROVEMENTS FUND !]ATER CAPI TAL PROJECT FUND SEUER CAP I TAL PROJECT FUND !/ATER FUND SEUER FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES TUND EOUI PMENT SERVI CES FUND TRUST AND AGENCY FUND UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 8 4 25 1 681 588 494 321 98'1 085 782 555 080 198 272 t18 95 82 49 08 02 83 36 00 20 65 90 63 TOIAL FOR APPROVAL BONORABLE MAYOR AID CITY COUNCIL: CERIIFY THAT THE CLAIUS LISTED ON PAGES NUI,4BERED FROM 1 TT]ROUCH B AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 85975 THROUGH 86068 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN OF $1,1?2,591,93, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AND IN I{Y OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN I,JITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AI.IOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEO, s1 ,1??,594.93 THIS ]S TO I NCLUSI VE, THE AMOUNT OFFICIALS, ACCORDANCE F I NANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT COUNCIL DATE DATE CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E I.]ARRA}IT REGISTER 10/31/02 VENDOR DETAI Lrrrr Denotes Hand l,,ritten Checks PAGE 7 AMOUNT 1,200.00 1,000.00 25 0.00 25 0.00 71.18 150.00 20.22 s1 ,122,591.93 NUMBER NAME 86061 86062 86063 86064 86065 86066 46067 86068 TOTAL ANN RIECK CLAI MS PAYMENTS CARLA SC I I'lEl,l I CO}IIRACTUAL SERVICES KEELY HAI.I I LTON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PACIFIC TEK MI SC. SUPPLIES ERI C JOHNSON M I SCELLANEOUS JOE LARRATT H I SCELLANEOUS KEVI II F LYNN I.4 I SCELLANEOUS 21013 BI TRAN SYSTEMS, INC. PROfESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21014 ACCOUNT 1,200.00 618 64520 601 1,000.00 320 79102 210 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 71.18 526 69020 120 150.00 731 22525 500.00 731 2?525 20.22 526 22502 24015 ?1016 24017 2401a 21019 24020 500.00 CI TY OF BURL INGAI,4E !]ARRANT REG I SIER 10t31/02 VEIIDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Uritten checks 101 54420 210 '101 64420 26? PAGE 6 AMOUNT 250.00 250.00 79.33 500.00 5,350.00 22,473 .19 495.00 383.21 16.19 862.00 42.22 't,403.00 1 ,772.75 193 .19 PAUL I.JEBB CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES CODY CROSEY COIITRACTUAL SERVICES THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S TRAI N I NG EXPEI,ISE ERLER AND KALINOI]SKI, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL IZED S PAT SI MONS TRAIIIING EXPENSE VI STA TRAINING TRAI N I NG EXPEIISE TRAI N I NG EXPENSE 86057 DEPARTI4ENT OF JUSTICE I.4I SCELLAI,IEOUS DUIIBAR ARMORED BANKI N6 SERVICE FEE S OTFICE EXPEI,ISE BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 OFF I CE EXPENSE ACCOUNT 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 79.33 101 65200 1',t 0 500.00 731 22525 I]UMBER NAME 86046 46047 85048 86050 8505I 86052 86053 86054 86055 86058 86059 2329? 23293 23319 23367 23531 23531 23646 23779 23905 23925 21011 MIKE KORDNER 11I SC, SUPPLIES REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 MISC. SUPPLIES 22,473.49 326 A0720 210 195.00 101 65200 260 343.21 101 68010 120 1212 16.49 619 61160 120 5120 431 .00 131 .00 526 69020 527 66520 12.22 101 66210 222 1,403.00 101 23620 273.75 499.00 101 61250 120 529 68030 110 4200 193.19 526 22502 60 60 ? 2 BETH PORTER 14I SCELLANEOUS 86050 STEVEN CAOIGAN HISCELLANEOUS ?4012 47.31 526 22502 47 .31 86049 I,I IMI SIEN fiI SCELLAT'lE0US 86056 KELLY MOORE TRAFF I C CONTROL MATERIALS 23613 1 ,875.00 3,475.00 CI TY OF BURLINGAMEL'ARRANT REGISTER '10/31/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r oenotes Hand Lrritten Checks PAGE 5 AMOUNT 3,151.80 1 ,305 .12 2,184.77 1,500,00 151.25 939.80 4,224.00 250.00 66.00 561.00 35.33 17,580.47 1 ,072.54 86031 86032 86033 FEHR AND PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZEO S 86031 ESA ENVIRONI'iENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 PROFESSI ONAL & SPECIALIZED S ON CAI4ERA PRODUCTIONS PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S ACCOUNT 3,153.80 101 61100 210 1,305.12 101 64560 210 2,188.77 '101 64400 210 1,500.00 101 32',100 NUi4BER NAHE 86035 86036 86037 86038 86039 86010 86041 86042 46043 86014 THE 8AN( OF NEI,I YORK I,I I SCELLANEOUS ?1177 21289 21139 21613 21675 21944 2?558 22618 22721 22751 22780 23035 23178 OU-ALL SAFETY TRAII'IIIIG EXPENSE TRAIIIING EXPENSE TRAINING EXPEI,ISE 180 " 51 135 .37 101 66210 260 526 69020 260 527 665?0 260 MISSIOII VALLEY FORD SUPPLIES VB GOIT LLC CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COUNTY CLERK SAN I{A'TEO COUNTY MISC. SUPPLIES KAREN SIMPSON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NICKIS DELI AND TINE FOODS TRAIIIING EXPENSE ItlILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 14I SCELLANEOUS N FPA I,I I SC. SUPPLIES CRITICAL SoLUT IoNS, Illc. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S MAZE & ASSOCIATES MISC. SUPPLIES 939.80 620 15000 4,224.00 101 68010 220 17A4 25.00 326 80770 120 250,00 '101 68010 220 1780 66.00 101 64420 262 561.00 61a 64520 231 35.33 101 65200 120 17,580.87 320 76010 210 1,072.50 '101 64560 120 86015 CYSERNET CoNSULT I NG, 'lC. PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S 23231 220.00 320 79400 210 220.00 25.00 NUI'IBER NAME 86016 86017 86018 86019 86020 86021 86022 86023 a60?1 86025 86026 86027 86028 86029 101 66210 180 320 805',]0 220 526 69020 180 527 66520 180 PAGE 4 ATIOUTT 10.72 2,778.20 41.14 1 ,620.00 429 .76 I ,377.46 9,786.32 17 ,725 .53 ?,540.04 250.00 512.00 1 ,518.63 262.50 21 ,271.43 CI TY OF BURLII,IGAI4E U'ARRATIT REGISTER 10/31/02 VENOOR DETAILr*r oenotes Hand Lhitten Checks BURTON IS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. POIIER U/ASH I NG SERVICE PROFESSIOTIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 8AY AREA EUSINESS CARDS IIIC OFF I CE EXPENSE STEVE SI LVER PRODUCTIONS INC t't I sc. suPPLlEs THO}{PSON PUBLISHING GROUP DUES & SUBSCRIPTIOI,IS UTI LI TY AERIAL INC EOU I PMENT MAINT, s&cF0R0 CAPITAL EOUIP}'4ENT AT&T U/IRELESS COMMUN I CAT IONS JOD I YOUNG CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GARY ERNST DEPOSIT REFUNDS SPRINT PCS UTILITY EXPENSE JASON GILMORE COiITRACTUAL SERVICES HARDISON KOMATSU IVEL I CH & PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 19366 19561 19588 19675 19741 19990 20060 20190 ?0301 20589 20603 20721 20926 20938 ACCOUNT 10.72 101 65200 203 2,778.20 101 66210 210 11.11 101 68020 110 2100 1,620.00 101 68010 120 1521 4?9.76 101 64420 240 1,177.46 101 68020 200 2300 PEN I NSULA CORRIDOR JOINT RENTS & LEASES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RENTS & LEASES RENTS & LEASES 266 986 266 266 67 32 67 66 1 5 1 I 17,725.53 620 66700 800 2,540.04 101 65200 160 250.00 101 68010 220 17B0 512.00 731 22520 1,518.63 896 20281 262-50 101 6A010 22A T516 ?1,274.43 320 76010 210 86030 OUICK I.iIX CONCRETE S IDEI.JALK REPAIR EXPENSE 21140 719.43 101 66210 219 719.43 CITY OF BURLI IIGAHE !/ARRANT REGISTER 10/31/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Llritten Checks ACCOUNT PAGE 3 AMOUNT 64.92 5,810.52 1 ,319.Aa 124 -42 125.00 2 , t+43 .50 194,951 .00 3,562.55 140.67 370.64 636.10 15.A3 86001 86002 86003 86004 86005 86006 86007 86008 86009 86010 8601 ',l 86012 86013 B6011 RADIO SHACK MISC. SUPPLIES COMI'4UN I CAT IONS SAN I,IATEO LOCK I,,IORKS BLDG. & GROUNDS I'1AI NT. VALLEY OIL CO. SUPPLIES CON EROSNAN MI SCELLANEOUS ACT I ON SPORTS MI SC. SUPPLIES SYDNEY MALKOO SMALL TOOLS CLARK PEST CONTROL RENTS & LEASES BAY ALARI4 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JJR CONSTRUCTION COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES COI,ITRACTUAL SERVICES PRUDENT IAL OVERALL SUPPLY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I'II NOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEI,4S EOIJIPMENT }.IAI NT. PRIORITY'] SUPPLIES ANG NEI,'SPAPERS PROFESSTONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 951 000 741 741 227 -00 143.64 101 64400 210 320 40560 214 320 75110 220 326 80780 220 ACCESS UNI FORI4S & EI4BROIDERY UNIFORMS AND EOUI PI!,IENT UNI FORI.IS AND EOUI PITENT 11749 14643 15764 16126 16735 '18851 18990 19027 19083 19131 19239 47.90 101 68010 190 1899 5,810.52 520 ',15000 500.00 731 22525 '1,349.88 101 68010 '120 1781 121.12 620 66700 130 '125.00 529 68030 1B0 4200 2,443.50 619 61460 220 5180 101 66210 It+O 527 66520 It+O 140.67 101 55200 220 45.01 620 '15000 121 , 70 00 00 28 27 860',I5 ARROU'HEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING UATER 14ISC. SUPPLIES 19330 2a3.15 32.46 32.46 101 66210 120 526 69020 160 47 .90 500.00 NUi4SER NAI,4E 18979 636.10 101 65200 200 283.45 527 66520 1?0 PAGE 2 AI,4OUNT 290.11 661.11 199,783.32 36,965.75 7,432.56 2,342.17 3.79 400.04 95 .53 725 .59 6,791.00 NUMBER IlATlE 8598B 85989 85990 85991 85992 85993 85994 85995 85996 85997 85998 85999 VENDOR OETA] L '*' Denotes Hand l,,ritten checks MINOLTA BUSI NESS SYSTEMS-I,/EST 02938 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ACCOUNT 1,878.00 101 65100 220 661.41 101 68010 120 178B 199,783.3? 526 69020 171 36,965.75 527 66530 274 7,132.56 320 76350 22A BURLINGAI'IE REC. DEPT. /PETTY CASI MISC. SUPPLIES U}II TORI.'S AND EOUIPI4ENI PUBLICATIONS & AOVERT ISING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAVEL & MEETINGS TRAIT,JIIIG EXPENSE MI SCELLANEOUS 101 101 101 101 101 101 731 NATIONIIIDE l.JIRE & BRUSH }.,tFG. SUPPLIES PERSONAL AIiARDS, INC. I'I I SC. SUPPLIES SAN FRAIICISCO UATER DEPT- I.IATER PURCHASES CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OT}IER ACENCY COIITRIEUTIONS TIiIBERLINE IREE SERVI CE, INC. COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES B. E. I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HISC. SUPPLIES SAFETY KLEEN CORP. COMMUN I CAT IONS MISC. SUPPLIES TURF & INDUSTRIAL EOUIPI,IENT CO. EOUI PI.IENT t.IA I NT. SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY MISC. SUPPLIES 14I SC. SUPPLIES ABAG . LIABILITY PROFESSIOIIAI & SPECI AL I ZED S 03002 03145 03353 03910 0907? 09168 09319 09459 09518 I ,566.26 181.0'1 10.00 387.00 -31 .00 115.00 110,90 120 144 150 22a 250 260 68010 68020 68010 68010 680'10 68020 22531 1 101 2?00 1950 1319 1 101 ?200 3.79 101 66240 120 95.53 101 68020 200 2200 206.51 193.50 567.23 '158.36 6,791.00 61A 64s20 210 86000 OOROTHY OI GRADY IIlI SC. SUPPLIES 11020 21.65 101 66210 120 21.65 03483 03760 CI TY OF BURLINGAII1E L'ARRANT REGISTER 10/31t02 290.11 620 15000 1 ,878.00 101 68020 160 2100 620 66700 120 10'1 68020 120 2200 529 68030 120 NUI'IBER NAI4E 85976 85977 45978 45979 85980 85981 BRENTON SAFETY, INC. TRAINING EXPENSE 14I SC. SUPPLIES TRAI N I NG EXPEIISE PAGE ? Atrl0uIT 39 _74 1 ,225 .60 80.00 216,523.49 38.76 17.43 37 .75 180.64 1,820.08 469.20 301.58 CITY OF BURLINGAMELiARRANT REGISTER '10/31/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand uritten Checks 85975 ,t CALIFORNTA STATE BoARD oF E1UALI 22424 L I BRARY- -BOOKS AND MAPS 847.00 101 67500 129 39.71 620 '15000 BAYSIIORE I NTERNAT IONAL TRUCKS SUPPL I ES 01236 01400 01551 021 10 02157 o2160 02218 42261 02645 02819 02898 205.68 811.25 205 -67 101 66210 260 5?7 66520 120 527 66520 260 CITY OF BURLINGAI,4E }.I I SCELLANEOUS EIJINC I RR I GAT ION PRODUCTS MI SCELLANEOUS FEDERAL EXPRESS OFFICE EXPENSE 80.00 '101 32100 85982 t,J. t,J. GRAI NGER, INC. I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 85983 85984 85985 85986 GRANITE ROCK COUPANY S IDEI'ALK REPAI R EXPENSE STREET RESURFACI NG EXPENSE K & !] DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP Iil I SC. SUPPLIES COIITRACTUAL SERVICES MANPOUER TEIT1PORARY EMPLOYI'IENT SVC. I,4I LLBRAE LUI,'8ER CO. BLDG. & GROUNDS i4AINT. S IDEI,/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE 21 .08 06.48 791aO 66530 66530 66530 66530 38.76 101 68020 192 2200 17,13 r01 64250 ',t10 37,75 619 64460 120 5120 169.20 101 65300 011 60.08 420.56 101 66?10 219 101 66210 225 237 .62 1,582.16 101 66210 120 619 64460 220 5230 327 527 527 527 527 210 190 210 220 800 5,1 10,8 61740.92 193,203.00 452.01 101 68020 190 2200 101 66210 219 85987 MEG MONROE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 02936 8?4.51 101 64400 210 824,54 ACCOUNT 126.8? 174.76 81.7.00 US FILTER OPERAT I I]G SERVICES PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S BLDG. & GRO,,NDS I'1AI NT. PROFESS IOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CAPI TAL EAUIPMENT 10-25-2002 CITY OT BURLINGAI.IE !/ARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP - 02-03 AMOU}ITIIAMEFU}ID 101 320 326 526 527 ,29 6't8 619 620 621 62' 731 n5 896 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEI.4ENTS FUNO U'ATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND I,ATER FUND SEL/ER FUIIO GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES TUND EOUI P}IENT SERVICES TUND INFORI.IATION SERVICES FUND FIRE I.IECHANIC SERVICES TUND TRUST AND AGEIICY FUND BURLINGAI.IE TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRA}.I UTILITY REVOLVIIIG FUNO 553.34 423.25 208.00 637.81 190.59 o81 .71 548-89 764.24 981.51 225,02 122 204 26 1 0 5 2 1 1 ,356.82 13t,816.54 25.08 4,031,35 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 5514,A47.19 HOI,IORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUI.JCIL: CERTIFY THAT TIIE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED TROi.I l THROUGH IO AltD,/oR cLAnrs ltur,{BERED FRofi 85845 IHRoUGH 85974 IXCLUSIVE,TOTALING I}t OF 8514,U7.19, }IAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AIID IN I.IY OPIIIION REPRESENT FAIR ATD JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY I}I LIITH TITEIR RESPECTIVE A q'lNTS AS I}IDICATED TIIEREON. THIS IS TO I NCLUSIVE, TllE AilOt T OTT I CIALS, ACCORDANCE FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT DATE DATE PAGE 10 RESPECTFULLY SUBI.IITTED. COUNCIL CITY OF BURLIIIGA}iE IIA R R A N T R E G I S I E R 10/25t02 VENDOR DETAI L,*' Denotes HaM l.l.itten Checks PAGE 9 At{0uIT 43,731.06 960.00 ?34.00 460 -23 26,602.50 2,960,79 700.00 700.00 700.00 700- 00 500 -00 300.00 853.14 s514,847.19 23911 85965 UBs 23951 MISC. SUPPLIES 45966 I.IINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S 85967 ADELSo|rI HESS &KELLY PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 24003 85968 UN IVERSAL SUI LD I NG SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RONALO AUGUST TAATZ CONIRACTUAL SERVI CES 85969 CHELSEA PALI'IER COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 85970 I.IICHELLE SALLING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85971 KATHERI IIE PAROD I CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85972 JOHN KAHO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85974 CALL ONE, INC. UNI FORi.IS AND EOUIPi{ENT ACCOUNT 13,734.06 320 75110 210 960.00 101 6f,010 220 1U+6 231.00 619 &460 220 51aO 160.23 101 68010 120 1111 26,602.50 320 80520 210 2,960.n 618 64520 210 700.00 101 68010 220 1781 700.00 10'l 68010 220 1781 700.00 '101 68010 220 1781 700.00 '101 68010 220 1781 500.00 101 68010 220 178't 300.00 731 2?520 853.14 101 65100 110 NUI.IBER NAME 45962 85953 85961 TOTAT CAI4BRIDGE CM INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZEO S DAVE CREAI4ER COIITRACTUAL SERVI CES 23840 24004 24005 24006 24007 24008 21009 24010 23876 85973 EOIII OINEILL DEPOSIT REFUNDS CITY OF BURLINGAXE!,4 R R A N T R E G I S T E R 10/25 /02 VEIIOOR OETAILr*r Denotes Hand Uritten Checks PAGE 8 AMOTJNT 2,900.00 48.98 500.00 500.00 1 ,578.35 246.26 172.40 31 ,599.32 320- 00 51,554.00 525.99 22,159.20 NUI4BER NAI,4E 85949 85951 85953 85954 85955 85956 a5957 85958 85959 85960 85917 JDH CORRoS!oI{ CONSULTAITS, INC. 23181 PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIALIZED S 85948 2,900.00 526 69020 210 48.98 526 69020 120 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 500,00 101 68010 220 1781 216,26 101 66100 110 172.40 101 6/./.00 120 31,599.32 320 80450 220 320.00 101 61120 030 13.51 526 69020 260 51,554.00 tzl 76010 220 525,99 101 66210 222 22,159.20 101 64400 210 SIERRA OTFICE SUPPLIES OFF I CE EXPENSE OFF I CE EXPENSE I.II SC. SUPPLIES I ,224.a4 56,83 292.8 10t 65300 110 526 69020 110 526 69020 120 DIRECTV MISC. SUPPLIES BI LL FINAULAHI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SAN FRANCISCO EXATII NER I.I I SC. SUPPLIES SECURITY SOLUTIO[S CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GORDON GOTTSCHE I.I I SCELLANEOUS CLARE EVANS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES THE I'IARLIN COI,IPANY TRAINTNG EXPENSE CITY NATTONAL BANK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES KELLY MOORE TRAFF I C CONTROL MATERIALS 23253 23283 23281 25501 23366 23112 23625 23645 23712 23758 DCE DESTcN,CCT'{4U tTy & ENVIRoN E 23784 PROTESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8596r CREA]E FOJNDATIOI.I }II SCELLANEOIS 23806 33,424.00 751 22543 33,424.O0 ACCOUIT 500,00 13.54 85950 BRUCE DOBBS CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES 85952 BOrSE CASCADE orFrCE PRoDUCTS CO 23306 OFFICE EXPEXSE 500,00 101 68010 220 1781 23779 CI TY OF BURLINGAI4E UA R R A N T R E G I S T E R 10/25t02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes tland lrritten Checks 8,359.09 I ,556. 10 529 36715 529 68050 215 A}IC[,NT 6,999.81 1,500,00 14, 5.00 1,000.00 7i2.80 42,00 9,995.19 600.00 630.00 600.00 75.00 696.48 600.00 45,000.00 85931 45932 85933 85931 85935 85936 85937 85938 85939 85940 85911 85942 85945 85911 85945 SA}I i4ATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 I.I I SCELLANEOUS ENTERPRI SE RENT A CAR MISCELLANEOI'lS TUREO OATA SYSTEUS, INC. l{ I SCELLAI,{E(US GREG BARNES CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES EUIIICE JEAII IJALCHA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PROVIDEI.ICE PEST TER}.IITE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S V8 GOLF LLC MI SCELLATIEOUS RECREATION PROGRAI,4 EXPENSE CARL OEOUANT COIITRACTUAL SERVICES MARSTEII STREET PARTNERS I.i I SC. SUPPLIES PENINSULA UNI FORI'I & EOI,IPI.IENT IIISCELLAiIEOUS ACCOUNT 6,999.81 101 37010 1,500.00 101 68010 220 1781 1/r,865.00 101 37010 1,000.00 618 &520 604 732.80 101 68,010 220 1547 42.00 619 61160 210 5150 MARK I,IEYERS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS I,IANAGEMENT 22382 COIITRACTUAL SERVICES 21767 21885 21914 21933 21917 21948 22051 22748 22821 ??812 22895 22899 600.00 l0l 68010 220 1781 650.00 101 68010 220 1785 75.00 101 65200 220 695.88 101 65200 260 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 25,000.00 320 76010 't 20 44,45 614 64520 604 MATT LENNON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES sAN MATEo REGIONAL NETUoRK, lNC. 22719 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GLASER AXD ASSOCIATES TRAINING EXPENSE 85945 MANUEL RAPOSO CO}ISTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUNDS 22969 512.00 731 22520 5',t2.00 NUMEER NAI.IE PAGE 7 44.85 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 CITY OF BURLINGAIIE !JARRANT REGISTEN 10/25/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r oenotes HEM Srritten checks NUI.IBER NAME 859',I6 85917 85918 85919 85920 85921 85922 85923 CDr,I GoVERNMENT, INC. ISC. SUPPLTES CIIARLES IIITT ]RAIIII G EXPE}ISE KATE DEATHRIDGE CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES FILTERTRESH COFFEE €XCELLENCE 8LDG. & GROUNDS MAI IIT. 85927 MlCRO UAREHdISE MISCELLANEOUS OFF I CE EXPENSE DELL MAR(ETING L. P. MISCELLANEOUS I,4UNIMETR IX SYSTEI.IS CORP, OFFICE EXPE}ISE I.IEECOR BUI LDERS }II SCELLANEOUS MELANIE I.IARATI I CONTRACTUAL SERVICES }'IOSES L IONGITAU CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ESA ENVIRONME}ITAL SCIENCE ASSOC DEPOSIT RETUND 116.96 -19. 526 69020 100 621 64150 110 20706 20900 20970 21132 21160 21482 21491 21599 2'16?3 21658 2168t 5,823.85 526 69020 400 t,'t30.00 101 64200 ll0 447.00 526 22102 960.00 101 68010 220 1231 1,400.00 101 68010 220 1781 15,510.72 731 22590 /+1,30 101 66100 120 636.38 101 65100 260 700,00 101 58010 220 1781 275.00 621 64450 190 252.22 101 68020 120 2200 264.00 l0l 68010 220 1545 256.50 101 68010 220 1611 ACCOUNT PAGE 6 AfioultT 66.98 '1 , 130.00 117 -O0 960.00 1 ,400,00 41.30 636.38 700.00 275.00 261.00 256.50 8r921 45925 859?6 85928 85929 H I LLYARD I.,I I SC. SUPPLIES TRACY SIRI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CHRI SSY HOLi.IES COIITRAC]UAL SERVICES 85930 CINGULAR IIIRELESS COMMUNI CAI IONS 21747 435.68 101 66100 150 135.68 20925 5,823.85 15,540.72 2',1723 CITY OF Bt]RLINGAI,IE !,ARRANT REGISTER 10/25/02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand lrritten Checks ACCoU T 181 128 '101 61100 1 '101 64200 1 4,244.94 101 64010 220 1212 244.47 409.61 620 15000 620 66700 400 251 .51 425,65 101 65200 203 625 65213 203 PAGE 5 NUI,4BER NAt'lE 85902 85903 85904 85905 85906 85907 85908 85909 85910 85911 859',l? 85913 85914 ANG NEI.'SPAPERS I,I I SC. SUPPLIES PUBLICATIO}IS & ADVERTISIIIG SIX FLAGS IiARINE U'ORLD CONTRACIUAL SERVICES PRIORITY'I SUPPLIES MI SCELLA}IEOUS SURTOII I S FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS }IA I NT. TIRE APPARATUS i.|AINT. BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC 11I SC. SUPPLIES RICIi POLONSKY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES KATHY KARAS CON]RACTUAL SERVICES EL CAi,II NO CHARIER LIi/ES INC t.I I SC. SUPPLIES AT&T UIRELESS CChll,lUN I CAT I Otl S LORI TALO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LYNX TECHI,IOLOGIES TRAI N I NG EXPENSE COUNTY OF SA}.I I{ATEO I.II SC. SUPPLIES 19083 19095 19119 19239 19588 19761 19812 20105 20301 20350 20501 20518 50 20 50 At'tot NT 612,72 574.15 4,244.94 654.48 677 .16 11.11 80.00 258.00 193.27 25.08 700.00 205.00 556.92 LIEBERT CASSIDY I,JHITMORE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S PROFESS IOI'IAL & SPECIALIZED S 737.15 337.00 101 64350 210 614 6$20 210 41,14 t01 64400 120 80.00 101 68010 220 1650 258.00 l0'l 68010 220 1644 193,27 101 68010 120 152r 700,00 l0l 68010 220 '1781 556.92 101 68010 120 1520 85915 PHIL SCOTT TRAVEL & I{EETINGS 20550 119.00 527 66520 250 459.00 19366 25,08 7t6 64571 160 205.00 526 69020 260 CI TY OF BURLINGAMEt,JARRANT REGISTER 10/25 /02 PAGE 4 AI.IOUN T 1 ,238.03 I ,760.00 '160.00 1 ,202.99 181.50 25.88 11.13 2,676.58 16,314.32 14,1a5.21 640.00 303.10 NUMBER NAI.4E 85887 8588B 85889 85890 85891 85893 85894 85895 85896 85897 85899 85900 LES KELLEY I t,IC PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 85898 KLE I NFELDER, INC PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S VALLEY OIL CO. SUPPL I ES SPECIALIZED COM}IUN I CAT I OII S I.I I SCELLANEOUS ACTT0 SPoRTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JAMES FORD TRAVEL & I,IEETINGS COI4UUNIlY GATEPATH PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL IZED S GOLDEN NURSERY MISC. SUPPLIES PENINSULA DIGITAL I I{AG I NG t.I I SC. SUPPLIES CONTRACIUAL SERVICES RAYI.IOND STOKLOSA COIITRACTUAL SERVICES LYNNE FIRESTONE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES PLASTI -PRINT, INC }I I SC. SUPPLIES ACC0Ut'tT 1,238.03 620 15000 1.760.00 731 22564 160.00 101 68010 220 178',1 1,202.99 101 55100 250 181.50 101 66210 210 23.88 101 66100 120 41.13 101 66210 120 240.00 l0'l 58010 220 1660 910.50 101 51350 210 14,185.21 320 80510 210 640,00 101 68010 220 1231 305.10 101 68020 120 2500 15761 15787 16167 16198 16575 16647 17531 17545 17764 18353 14644 18746 1a794 320 80420 120 520 80520 220 06 52 804 872 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA IIATER PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 526 69020 210 526 69020 210 85901 PREFERREO ALLIANCE PERSONNEL EXA}.I I }IAT I OI'IS 19025 237.60 101 64420 121 237 .60 85892 COMP USA I,4ISC. SUPPLIES VENDOR DETAIL.*r Denotes HEnd Lrritten Checks I ,155.52 15,181 .00 240,00 910.50 CI TY OF BURLINGA}1E !,ARRANT REGISIER 10/2' /02 VENDOR DETAIL '*' oenotes Hand trritten checks PAGE 3 IIUMBER TIAME 85873 85871 85875 85876 85877 85878 85879 85880 85881 85882 85883 85884 85885 ACCOUNT 101 '101 420 526 526 527 619 71.33 101 64250 110 944.08 TAB PRODUCTS CO. OIFICE EXPENSE SEOUOIA UNION HIGH SCHOOL OFF I CE EXPEI'ISE ITISC. SUPPLIES THE AOA}I-HILL COMPANY F IRE APPARATUS I4AINT. !/ECo IIoUSTRIES, I NC. I.i I SC. SUPPL I ES INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM FIRE APPARATUS i'IAI NT. NORTH VALLEY OIL MISC. SUPPLIES AT&T UTI LITY EXPENSE DEIIEY PEST CONTROL RAT CONTROL PROGRAM ALL CITY }IANAGEI4ENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ORCHARD SUPPLY HARD$'ARE MISC. SUPPLIES BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. MISC. SUPPLIES t'I I SC. SUPPLIES TRAI N I NG EXPENSE SMALL TOOLS TI I SC. SUPPLIES 68010 68020 80790 690?0 69020 66520 64460 120 1111 r90 2200 120 120 260 130 120 5120 09670 09677 09720 09979 11532 11571 11640 13689 13940 '11338 15595 85 38 56 65 00 89 56 692 35 2'10 113 275 53 226 AI'IOUNT 1 ,617.89 958.03 3,350.00 225.00 5,055.25 191.75 697.70 496.27 92.00 155.25 5,555,88 3,455.40 101 65100',t10l0l 65200 1ll LEOIIA I.IORIARTY CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES TELECO.II{UIIICATIONS EIIGINEERING A 10101 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LC ACT ION POLICE SUPPLY MISCELLANEOUS 23.95 3,360.00 101 68010 220 1460 22r.00 101 65200 220 697.70 527 66520 120 496.27 625 65213 203 92.00 620 66700 120 '155.25 896 20281 3,535.88 101 66210 218 3,455.40 101 65100 22O 85886 PENII{SULA SPORTS OTTICIALS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15711 2,156,50 101 68010 220 17A7 2,156.50 71 .33 13815 5,035.25 101 65100 /.00 194.75 625 65213 203 CI TY OF EURLINGAI.IE!/ARRANT REGISTER 10/25./02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand trritten Checks 't 1,000.00 2,978.00 108.78 747.49 108.23 22.00 2,713.11 240.00 162.00 86.55 327.35 l0l 68010 190 fi14 320 80550 220 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 13,978.00 134.At 4,515.51 305.75 765.00 't ,280.00 333-00 5,883.02 208.00 64.52 857.35 900 - 50 ACCOUNTNUI.IBER NAI,4E 85860 85861 85862 85863 85864 85865 85865 85867 85868 SAN I,4ATEO UNIOII HIGH BLDG. & GROUNDS I4AII'IT. CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 8LDG. & GROUNOS MAINT. I,IEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. PROEESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S JEA}I EUCKS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES BERNICE I NII COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES MUFFIE CALBREATH CON]RACTUAL SERVICES POM INC. CAPITAL EOUIPI.4ENT TESTI},IG ENGI NEERS. INC. COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ABAG - LIABILITY CLAII.iS PAYIllENTS 03471 03764 03910 03961 09019 09088 09'125 09?48 09t18 101 101 101 101 101 101 10'l 529 731 68010 68010 68020 68010 68010 58010 68010 58030 2?534 134.81 101 68020 190 2200 EURLIIIGAI.IE REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH OFF I CE EXPEIISE MISC. SUPPLIES U}I I FORI.IS AND EOUIPII1EI'IT COi.Ii'IUN I CAT I ON S COIITRACTUAL SERVICES DTJES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TRAVEL & MEE]INGS MISC. SUPPLIES MI SCELLANEOUS 110 120 140 160 220 240 250 120 1100 1899 2200 'I 100 1349 1',t01 1101 09270 85869 STERICYCLE, INC. SUPPL I ES 094t9 85870 ocE ' -BRUN ING, lNC. PROIESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S 09193 a5a71 305.75 61a 64520 210 765.00 101 68010 220 1544 1,280.00 101 6s010 220 1644 333.00 101 68010 220 1891 5,883.02 320 80480 800 208.00 326 80320 220 64.52 '01 65200 112 857.35 '10'l 65'100 210 900.50 61A 64520 601 45872 OLEIS FIRE APPARATUS I.IAINT. 09626 240,15 625 65213 203 240,15 NUMBER NAME 85845 85846 85847 85848 85819 85850 85851 85852 85853 85854 85855 85856 85858 L'. !/. GRAIT'tGER, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES PAGE 1 AMOUNT 1 ,667 .62 329.08 552.00 2,736.00 180 - 00 515.50 3,A76.11 478.26 631-35 768.00 1,340.61 129.42 330,88 CI TY OF BURLIIIGAME !/ARRANT REGISTER 10t25 t02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*i Denotes Hand lJritten Checks ACTION CLEANING SERVI CE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO, MISC. SUPPLIES BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. RECREAT ION EXPE}ISES ANASTASIA COLE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UACEK DENIIAOI.II CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GENE EVANS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EIIIIIG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS I.{ISCELLANEOUS I.IATER/FINANCE PETTY CASII MISCELLANEOUS 01030 01059 01663 01945 02044 02119 02157 02144 02218 02645 02873 03080 ACCOUNT 1 ,67.62 619 61160 220 5130 329,04 101 66210 120 552.00 101 10700 2,736.00 101 68,010 220 1644 180.00 101 680'10 220 '.t311 535.50 101 54010 220 1611 113,38 10'l 68020 192 2200 1,a76.11 A96 202a2 479.39 39.16 -40.29 101 68020 101 65200 619 64460 120 2200 130 120 5220 K & I,I DISCOJNT LIGHTING & SUPP I.I I SC. SUPPLIES MANPOTJER TEI,4PORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. ROIIOA CAIiIE ALCANTARA TRAVEL & MEETINGS CIIY OF SAN I.IATEO CONIRACTUAL SERVICES 634.35 6't9 64460 120 5120 768.00 ',t01 65300 011 1,340.61 'to't 55100 250 429.42 tot 67500 160 330.88 101 65200 220 8s859 SAN I.IATEO COUNTY CO}.IVENT I O}.I & I.IISCELLANEOUS 03431 81,952.17 731 22187 41,952.47 02819 03366 143.38 85857 PACI FIC BELL COMMUII I CAT I ON S 10- 17 -2002 NAME TOTAL FOR APPROVAL CI TY OF SURLII.JGAI'IEIJARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP - 02-03 PAGE 9 AMOUI,ITFUND '101 327 ,26 5?7 524 529 618 619 620 621 625 731 734 896 117, 528, 9,)) 1, 1, 11, 10, ?6, ?8, 31, 6, 61, 878.69 00't.17 285 903 058 295 249 439 740 858 618 00 84 79 00 20 58 34 55 91 55 83 21 89? 145 711 025 iilllTl ar7 v&? 6 n76. \i ;3 - TIII S IS TO INCLUS IVE, THE AMOUNT OFFICIALS, ACCOROANCE HONORABLE I,IAYOR AND CITY COTJNCIL: CERTIFY THAT TIIE CLAII,4S LISTED ON PAGES NUI.IBERED FRO}I 1 TIIROI.JGH 9 AND/OR CLAII,IS NUIIBEREO FROI.I 85rJO TIIROUGH 85844 INCLUSIVE,TOTALII.IG III OF S853,403.90, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN OETAIL AXD APPROVED BY THE PROPER AND III MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN LIITI'I THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED EOR PAYI.IENT DATE COUNC I L DATE GEI/ERAL FUND CAPI IAL IMPROVEI.IENTS TUND SEI.'ER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND L/ATER FUIID SElllER FUI.ID SOLID L'ASTE FUND GOLI CENTER FUND SELF I NSURA}ICE FUNO FACI L I TIES SERVICES TUI]D EOUIPUENT SERVI CES FUND I NTORI.4ATION SERVI CES IUND FIRE MECHAI{IC SERVICES FUND TRUST AI.ID AGENCY FUND STATE GRANTS FUND UTILIIY REVOLVING FUNO NUI.IBER NAI,4E 85832 85833 85834 85835 85836 ABS 85838 85839 85840 85811 85843 85844 EAUIPMENT ITAITIT. NEXTEL CO{I4UN I CAT I ON S co flutt I cAT I 0 s coi{.tu[ I cAT I 0N s T]INZLER & KELLY CONSULTII{G ENGIN 25992 PROFESSIOXAL & SPECIALIZED S UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES COIITRACTUAL SERVICES FREDERICK TYLER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES OEPOSIT REFUNOS CITY OF BURLINGAME!]ARRANT REGI STER 10/17/02 VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand Hritten Checks ACCOUNT 2,362.00 619 64160 220 279.85 171.81 10'l 68020 150 619 61160 160 9,4ft.25 320 80520 210 653 - 00 800.00 23941 23916 23993 ?3994 23995 23996 23997 23998 23999 24000 24001 24002 2200 PAGE 8 AMOUNT 2,362.00 151.69 9,816.25 1,463.00 143,?0 '150.00 1,1?1.30 624.00 276.08 137 ,90 380,00 88.7J 22002 20 803 225 320 85837 ROBERTO I.IARTIIIEZ DEPOSIT REFUNDS RADISSON HOTEL SACRAIIIEI.ITO TRAINING EXPENSE JOHN PAROLA DEPOSIT REFUNDS CALCH I ETS BOOKSTORE MISC. SUPPLIES 8O8 FANIIUCHI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PACITIC AERIAL SURVEYS PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 113-20 101 65300 200 150-00 731 22520 1,121.30 101 66100 260 621.00 731 22520 157.90 101 6a010 ??O 1372 380.00 526 69020 260 119.66 618 64520 210 88.2 526 69020 120 BAVCO MISC. SUPPLIES TOTAL $1163,405.90 858/12 DHs OcP TRAI N I NG EXPENSE 276.08 101 65200 120 119.66 CI TY OF BURLINGAIIIEIJARRANT REGISIER 10/17/0? VENDOR DETAILr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks PAGE 7 NU},I8ER NAME 858'17 85818 85819 85822 85823 85825 85825 85828 85829 85830 85820 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. CI TY HALL I4AIIITENANCE 85821 I BI'I CORPORAT ION EAUIPI'IEIIT I.IAI NT. RON LITTLE iII SCELLA},IEOJS CRESCO EOUIP}.IENT RENTALS STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE ACCOUNT 35.00 731 2251A 236.55 101 65300 200 1 ,573.15 621 6t 450 200 949.75 '101 64420 030 34.47 101 66210 226 300.00 731 22520 168.16 619 64460 120 51A0 98.00 526 69020 260 1,899.50 101 64420 030 1,295.00 528 65600 210 '181.09 101 65150 160 2.250.00 731 22516 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 PROFESSIOIIAL & SPECIAL I ZED S TRAI N I HG EXPENSE 750 500 101 64420 210 101 64420 262 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION i4GMT t.I I SCELLANEOUS 00 00 3, 1, AI4OUNT 5,350.00 35.00 236.55 1 ,573.15 949 ,75 34.47 300.00 16a.46 98.00 1,899.50 1,295.00 't81.09 2,250.00 ]HE MARLIN COMPANY TRAI N I NG EXPENSE 45827 KELLI DUTTO MI SCELLAI,IEOUS SCS FIELD SERVICES PROTESSIOI.IAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ERLER ANO KALINOL'SKI,INC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85821 EPS, rNC. DEPOSIT REFUNDS MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. iI I SC, SUPPLIES PACIFIC BELL,/!/ORLDCOM COMI.IUN I CAT IONS VENTURE 8UI LDERS MI SCELLANEOUS 23111 23425 23436 23461 23470 23531 23547 23611 23712 23727 237?8 23824 85831 MERRI TT SI'iI TH CONSULTING PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S 23903 2,319.91 526 69020 210 2,319.91 985.76985.76 526 69020 220 237?6 CITY OF BURLII'IGAMEUARRAI,IT REGISTER 10/17t02 VENDOR DETAI Lr*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks PAGE 6 AUOUNT 731 .?5 ?9.40 10,869.95 1 ,975 .00 71 .25 17,138.58 68.50 5 20.00 438- 78 4,212.00 195.00 1,913.00 340.00 7,195.17 441,00 NU}.IBER NAME 85803 85804 8s805 85806 85810 85811 85812 858'13 85801 JORGENSOI,I, SIEGEL, I'ICCLURE & FLE 22144 PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85802 ACCOUNT 731.25 101 6/.350 210 29.80 10'1 65200 202 320 805't 0 210 3?7 80681 210 1,975.00 731 22546 71.25 101 6a010 220 1644 47,138.58 101 66210 223 68.50 101 64420 262 520.00 896 20281 8,242.00 61E 61520 225 495. D0 101 65200 260 1,913.00 619 64160 210 340.00 731 22516 7,195.17 320 79400 210 411,00 101 68010 120 1422 AUTO PRIDE CAR UASII VEIIICLE [AINT. UNDERGROJND CONSTRUCT ION I{ANAGER PROFESSIO}IAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S RONALD GROVE T.IISCELLANEOUS PATRI CIA MCI{ORROI,,I CONTRACTUAL SERVICES JE}IKI NS/ATHENS INS CLAIIIS ADJUSTING SERVI CES STEVE EII LERS TRAI N I NG EXPENSE MCMI LLAN ELECTRIC PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S ?2278 22305 22576 22584 22634 22780 23014 23066 23316 1 ,544.95 9,285.00 ANZA ENGINEERING OITCH & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN 85807 }IICKIS DELI ANO FINE FOOOS TRAI NI NG EXPE},ISE N FPA I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 22721 85808 sAN r.rATEo REGTONAL NETI.IoRK, tNC. 22759 UTILITY EXPENSE 85809 85814 CYBERNET CONSULT I IIG, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZEO S 23231 85815 GAUL AND SONIS GENERAL CO}ITRACTO 23200 MI SCELLANEOIJS GREG I,4I LANO MISC. SUPPLIES 85816 LARRATT BROS PLUI{SING DEPOSIT REFUNDS 23360 1,000.00 731 22520 1,000.00 438.78 101 65200 120 CITY OI BURLITIGAMEI.IARRANT REGISTER 10/17/02 VENDOR DETAI L '*r Denotes Hand gritten Checks 20246 20300 20161 20636 2148? 21521 21547 INC.21631 21656 21421 21917 21948 66210 140 69020 140 66520 140 64460 140 66700 140 PAGE 5 Al40uIT 350.00 159.17 336.26 295.81 64.02 16.63 66.71 300.00 1 ,283.41 175.07 300.00 84.00 11,071.13 NUMBER NA},IE 85788 85789 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. SUPPLIES 85790 85791 8579? e5793 85791 85796 85797 85798 85799 SAFELITE GLASS CORP. VETIICLE }IAINT. PEEK TRAFFIC PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S CDli GOVERNMENT, INC. OFF I CE EXPENSE CIIICORP VENDOR FINANCE, I },IC, EOUIPMENT MAIiIT. LARRY I'IORSELLO DEPOS IT REFUNDS ACCOUNT 560.00 621 64150 160 159.17 320 78490 1?0 ??OO 336.26 620 15000 295.41 101 65200 202 61.02 101 66240 ?10 46.63 101 61250 110 66.71 101 65200 200 300.00 731 22520 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER MISC. SUPPLIES ARA'.IARK UI.I I FORiI UNI FORiIS AND UNI FORHS AND UNT FORI.IS AND UNI FORI{S AIID IINI FORI.IS AND SERVI CES. EOIJ I PIIEII T EOU I PIiE I'I T EOUI PI.IENT EOUI PME}IT EOUI PMEIIT 101 5?6 527 619 620 105.07 334.03 357 .20 '107.90 79.61 PORTOSAN REIITS & LEASES SEI.'ER RAT DEPOSIT REFUNDS PROVTDENCE PEST TERMITE PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S VB GOLF LLC I.4 I SCELLAIIEOUS RECREATIOTI PROGRAM EXPEIISE 175.07 529 68030 180 2200 300.00 731 22520 84.00 619 64460 210 5160 9 ,297 .83 I ,776.30 529 36715 529 64030 213 85800 COMPAA CO$IPUTER CORPORATION CAPITAL EOUIPI.IENT 21999 10,712,70 320 80420 800 10,742.70 85787 AFFINITEL CO.IMUN ICAT IONS CO.iMU}.IICATIONS 21317 85795 CITY OF BURLIN6Ai.IE!]ARRANT REGISTER 10/ 17 /02 VENDOR DETAILr*r oenotes tland Uritten Checks PAGE 1r Al40uilT 1 ,A3t+.20 327 .00 15,131.00 102.00 6,584.84 216.50 163 ,997 .00 1 ,392,a9 136.08 512.55 3,636.00 6,025.83 6,347.16 85772 85"171 85771 85776 85777 85778 85779 85780 8578',1 45742 85784 85785 H I -TECH EI,IERGENCY VEHICLE FIRE APPARATUS MA I NT. PIOIIEER RANDUSTRIAL EOUI PI.IENT I{A T NT. ACCURATE I.IAILINGS, INC OFTICE EXPENSE CRANE PEST CONTROL PROFESSIONAL & SPECIAL I ZED S RAGI NG IIATERS COTITRACTUAL SERVICES PLAST I.PRINT, INC TRAET I C CONTROL MATERIALS DE IS J. AlrORoSo CONTRACTUAL SERVICES IMAGEMAX, INC. MI SCELLANEOUS POTIER U'ASHING SERVICE PRO'ESSIOI.IAL & SPECIALIZEO S DELTA SATETY SUPPLY CO I'4 I SCE L LAN ECUS PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ACCESS UN I FORMS & EIT{BROIDERY UNI FORI,IS AND EOUIPI.IENT UNI FORIIS AND EOUIPI{ENT 991,68 401 .?1 101 66700 ',1i+0 619 64160 110 ANG NEI.]SPAPERS MI SC- SUPPLIES 17546 17547 17623 17764 18103 18665 18791 18990 19083 19115 19564 19827 20060 ACCOUI,IT 105.21 625 65213 203 1,831.20 ',101 58010 200 1286 327.00 320 79160 110 15,131 .00 526 69020 240 102.00 619 61160 210 5110 6,5U.84 101 68010 220 1212 216.50 101 66210 222 163,997.00 320 76010 2?0 136.08 320 80700 120 6,025.83 734 65195 400 6,317,16 320 80510 220 85786 GE CAPI TAL OTF ICE EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CI TY HALL MAINTENANCE 20216 99.73 398.94 1,05?.48 101 68020 110 2100 101 68010 220 1101 6?1 64450 200 1 ,551 . 15 512.55 7s1 22518 3,636.00 101 66210 210 8'775 SAI'I FRANCISCO BAY AREA UATER OUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS NUMBER NAUE 18970 '105 .21 CI TY OT BURLINGAMEIIARRANT REGISTER 10t17/02 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 4 ,362.00 191.85 2,077.75 256.50 733.94 219 .39 4,753.00 ?1.65 143.47 2,498.07 152.79 23,367.93 22,a75.00 NUMBER NAME 85761 85762 85763 85761 85765 85766 45767 85768 85769 a5770 85757 85758 DOROTHY OIGRADY TI I SC. SUPPLIES 85759 IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYING, INC. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S 85760 ACCOUIIT 1,168 't 9/, - 85 526 69020 120 2,077,75 618 64520 210 ?56,50 101 68010 220 1611 733.94 101 64420 1r0 219.39 896 20281 100.00 1,653.00 101 66210 210 101 66210 218 21.65 101 66210 120 48.80 91,67 101 64020 120 2200 619 &460 120 5170 2,494.07 620 15000 ?3,367,93 620 66700 800 22,875.00 731 22s55 E}IPLOYME}.IT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTI.IEN I.{lSCELLANEOUS TEI4PORARY EI.IPLOYI4ENT SVC. t.I I SCELLANEqJS 00 00 00 10'l 65100 010 101 67500 011 527 66520 010 10567 11020 11352 11610 13759 13910 11338 14855 15739 15761 15427 16126 16629 16819 2,531 663 UI LI4A BURGESS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES THE I.IAGIC PRESS CORP. PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING AT&T IJTILITY EXPE}ISE DEIJEY PEST CONTROL PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALI ZED S RAT COI{TROL PROGRA}I ROYAL L'HOLESALE ELECTRIC r,4I SC. SUPPLTES I4I LLBRAE LOCK SHOP I.4I SC. SUPPLIES I.llI SC. SUPPLIES VALLEY OIL CO. STJPPLIES M D LII,IEN SERVI CE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES CON BROSIIAN IIlISCELLANEOUS MIJN I CIPAL UAIIITENANCE CAPITAL EOUIPMENT BROADIdAY EUSINESS IlISCELLANEOUS 85771 COLORPRINT DICITAL OFF I CE EXPENSE 17197 97.36 526 69020 110 97.36 VENDOR OETAI L,*r Denotes Hahd Llritten Checks 250.00 15?.79 101 65200 220 250.00 731 22546 CIIY OF BURLINGAI.IELiARRANT REGISTER 10/17t02 VEIIOOR DETAI L.*r Denotes Hand Lrritten Checks NUI'IBER NAI.IE 45743 PK SAFETY SUPPLY ISCELLAIE0rrS 85714 STEPHEt.I J. PICCflI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85745 SANDRA POEE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85716 SAN ERANCI SCO CTIRONICLE PUBLICATIOIIS & AOVERTISING 85747 CITY OF SAN I,iAIEO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85719 I IMBERL I NE TREE SERVICE, INC, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85750 ACCOUNT 879.11 101 65500 400 528.00 101 68010 220 1372 '1,758.00 101 68010 220 16/./r 232.76 101 64420 150 6,000.00 101 65200 220 167.11 620 66700 130 25,782.72 320 76350 220 17,754.00 101 65200 220 180.00 320 80320 210 197.71 620 15000 03108 03168 03175 03310 03366 03587 03760 09560 09720 09881 10256 PAGE 2 AHOUNT 879.11 1,758.00 232.76 6,000.00 167.11 25,782.72 17,754.OO 180.00 197.71 1 ,179.1O 1 ,482.98 703.00 131.93 09234 85751 TESTING ENGTNEERS, lNC, PROFESSIONAL & SPEC IAL I ZED S 09270 85752 floEL L, r,rILLER, INC, STJPPL IES 09499 CITY OT I LLBRAE CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES SEOUOIA UNION HI GH SCIIOOL OFF I CE EXPEI.ISE BLDG. & GNOUNDS MAIIIT. 85754 275.51 903.89 101 68020 200 2200 '101 68020 400 2200 714.52 768.16 621 61150 110 621 61150 190 45755 CRAIG !/. REED CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES 85756 AUGUST SUPPLY, IIIC MISC. SUPPLI ES 705.00 101 68010 220 1787 134.93 101 65200 111 85748 SNAP ON T@LS SI.IALL TOOLS 85753 sAl{ ATEo LArJr,t rrlo!/ER SHop EOUI PI{EIIT I.IAIIIT. MI SCELLANEOUS 528.00 I'IUMEER NAI{E 45730 85731 85732 85733 85734 a5735 85737 85r38 8573 9 45740 85741 ALPINE AIIARDS, ItIC. MISC. SUPPLIES BRENTOI'I SAFETY. INC. TRAINING EXPENSE GCS ITIESTERN POIIER & I.I I SCELLANEOUS PACI FIC BELL UTILITY EXPENSE 101 66240 120 101 66210 130 101 65200 203 526 69020 120 320 80420 800 621 61150 160 621 61450 220 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 132.07 159,43 2,706.25 23,682.17 1,411.24 332.50 116.16 768.00 3,206.88 57,684.61 3,227.80 CITY OF BURLINGAI4El.,ARRANT REGISTER 10t17t02 VENDOR DETAI L '*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks ACCOUftT ACE HARDL]ARE }I I SC. SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. MISC. SUPPLIES 25.19 39.57 29.99 37 .32 01027 01052 01/+00 01857 01862 01987 02218 02625 02880 1 ,069.67 300.00 22,312.50 597.00 101 65200 120 159.43 101 66210 260 2,706.25 '10'1 58020 400 2200 CITY OF REDI,'OOD CITY CAPITAL EOUIPI"IENT cotrltrluN I cAT I 0N s CITY HALL MAINTETIANCE P. G. & E. I.4 I SCE L LAN EOTJS GAS & ELECTNIC UTILITY EXPENSE coliPUTER TECHN I CIANS, INC., CITY TIALL MAINTENANCE HO!]ARD JONES BATTERI ES, INC. SUPPLI ES MANPOl.'ER TEI.IPORARY EMPLOYI'IENT SVC. US FILTER I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 1,811.24 621 64450 200 332.50 619 64460 120 146.16 620 15000 768.00 101 65300 0ll 3,206.88 526 69020 120 ?7 .36 10.23 57,651.02 101 66210 527 66520 896 20280 72 70 3,227 .80 a96 ?02A1 27 ,04 2A.36 65,49 340.73 PATTERSON PARTS, INC F IRE APPARATUS MAINT. SIIIAL L TOOLS SUPPLIES FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 03106 101 65200 203 527 66520 130 520 15000 625 55?13 203 461.62 597.00 02819 03054 03080 85736 I,J.I.'. GRAI NGER, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES 85712 10- 1 1 -e002 NAME GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEIiIENTS FUND I.IATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND SEI.IER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND I.IATER FUND SEI.JER FUND GOLF CENTER FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES SERVICES FUND EOUIPI.IIENT SERVICES FUND INFORMATION SERVICES FUND FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND TRUST AND AGENCY FUND BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM CITY OF BURLI}IGAME!,ARRANT REGISTER FUND RECAP . 02-05 FUND PAGE 9 AMOUNT 101 320 3?6 327 526 527 5?9 618 619 620 621 625 731 736 73,510.49 214,134.05 121 ,806.41 6,686.45 1,196.39 $555, 068 . 39('*,or>VorD uL gsb73 565.47 1,242.50 5,465.04 5 , 920 .33 3,504.37 22,757.32 66.39 61,002.38 1 5,21 0.80 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO I NCLUS I VE, THE AI'IOJNT OFFICIALS, ACCORDANCE CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUTTBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 AND./OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FRO}I 85621 THROT'GH 85729 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN OF $555,068.39, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DEIAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN t.JITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMI TTED, DATEFINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR PAYMENT DATECOUNC I L t CTTY OF BURLITIGAI{E!,4 R R A N T R E G I S T E R 10/11/02 VENOOR DETAILr*r Denotes H€nd lrritten Checks PACE 8 AMOUNT 376.56 64.00 3,101.00 1,988.41 2,338.20 500.00 $533,068.39 IIOIJARD ATKINS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEPOSIT REFUNDS 85727 DOT.IIIIICS AT POPLAR CREEK MISC. SUPPLIES JUDY NTCKSON JONES CLAII.IS PAYI.IEIITS TODD I'IEISTER I,4ISCELLANEOUS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS i.|ACHINES CITY HALL I{AINTENAI{CE ROBERT SMI]H I,ITSCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 61.00 526 22502 1,304.00 1,800.00 320 A0302 220 731 22520 1,988.41 101 68010 120 1784 2,33r,.20 621 61150 200 500.00 731 22525 IIUI'IBER NAI4E 85721 85725 85726 85728 85729 TOTAL 23986 23987 23988 23989 ?3990 376.56 61A 61520 601 23991 CI TY OF BURLINGAI4EI.IARRAIIT REGISTER 10/11/02 VE}IOOR DEIAILr*' Denotes Hand Uritten Checks PAGE 7 AMOUNT 87.50 88.00 2,827 .50 311.70 729 .10 121 ,806.41 450.00 155,160.00 17,240.00 5,597.19 2,623 .99 16.16 1,000.00 NUIIBER NAME 85708 85709 85711 a5712 85713 85711 85716 85717 85718 85719 uBs 85720 85721 85722 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES KAREN SCHEIXOL'ITZ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85710 EPS, tNC. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOROON GOTTSCHE TRAVEL & I.4EETINGS BKf ENGI}iEERS PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZEO S CJIS DELI TRAI N I NG EXPENSE AT&T CO4IIUN I CAT I ON S S.G. 8AR8ER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I'ATER ENVIROII}IENT FEDERAT ION TRAVEL & }.IEETINGS NICHOLAS JOHI ALL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRINET COIISTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MECEANICS BANK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ACCOUNT 87.50 101 64420 262 88.00 101 68010 220 1661 2,827.50 327 74536 220 311-70 101 65210 250 72e.10 320 79120 210 24.12 621 64450 160 121,A16.11 326 AO120 220 450.00 527 66520 250 190.50 101 64010 220 1660 '155,160.00 320 80510 220 17,21a.00 320 805',10 220 5,59/.19 619 64460 220 5180 ?,623.99 320 80580 400 16.16 101 66210 010 '1,000.00 101 68010 400 1106 STRINGER BUSIIIESS SYSTEI,4S M I SCELLANEOUS I NTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE il I SCELLANEOUS BURLIIIGAI.IE AYSO }1I SCELLANEOUS 23502 23507 23547 ?3625 23641 23661 23664 23711 23847 23951 23973 23981 23981 45723 RUSS COHEN CONIRACTUAL SERVICES ?3985 283.50 101 68010 220 1660 283 -50 23843 23860 20.1? 190.50 CITY OF AURLINGA}IE}JARRANT REGISTER 10/11/02 VENDOR DETAILr,r Denotes llard f.itten Checks PAGE 6 AMOUNT 15,210.80 79.10 13,300.75 5,000.00 160.00 742,80 80.65 131.66 521 .00 190.00 175.00 49.00 3,87't .00 176.01 1,203.00 NUI.IBER NAII1E 8569? 85693 85694 85695 85695 a5697 85698 85699 85701 85702 85703 85704 85705 85706 PENINSULA FORD OF SAN ERUNO SUPPLTES 85700 ALYSON ZUPPERO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARKING COI.4PANY OF AI.IERICA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES VERIZO}I I.TIRELESS COMI.IU}I I CAT I ON S COUNTY OF SAII I'IATEO CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PITIIEY BO!'ES RESERVE ACCOUNT MI SCELLANEOUS ROBERTA TAVAKE COIITRACTUAL SERVICES PEPS I -COLA MISC. SUPPLIES NICKIS OELI ANO FINE FOOOS OFF I CE EXPENSE THE MOBILE STORAGE GRCIJP 8LDG. & GROIJNDS }IAI I1T. TLC ADMI N I STRATORS M I SCELTANEOUS AT&1 I,JIRELESS cor.f4uN t cAT I oN s RIJSSELL NOBLES CONSTRUCTIOI,I MI SCELLAI'IEOUS ACC0U T 15,21r. B0 736 64570 220 7e.10 101 68010 ',160 1f01 13,300.75 101 65200 220 5,000.00 101 15500 160.00 101 68010 220 1661 71,2.80 101 68010 120 1899 8r.65 101 61120 110 131.66 620 15000 621.00 101 68010 220 1661 190.00 526 69020 190 17s.00 101 64420 030 19.40 101 65200 160 3,87r.00 731 22546 175.04 101 64250 110 1,201.00 320 80570 210 80tsE cAscADE oFrrcE pRooucTs c0 23506 OTFICE EXPEIISE CULVER GROUP PROFESSIOiIAL & SPECIALIZED S 22500 22593 22620 22624 22672 2269a 2272',1 z?894 22917 23138 24156 23169 23185 23114 85707 ZEIGER E}IGINEERS COIITRACTUAL SERVICES ?3150 1,212.50 529 68030 220 1 ,242.50 CITY OF BURLINGATIEIJARRAIIT REGISTER 10t11/02 VENDOR DEIAIL '*r oenotes Hahd llritten Checks ACCOUNT PAGE 5 AI.4OUNT 2,012.30 160.00 14, 1 10.5 0 91.25 83. 16 1 ,223 .37 231 .00 3,955.00 843.14 88. rJ 813.76 400.00 20.52 3,858.95 ?1747 85682 ENFORCEI'IENI TECHNOLOGY, INC. I{ I SC. SUPPL I ES 21719 85683 CoRPoRATE EXPRESS OF THE I/EST, I 2t819 I.I I SCELLANEOUS 85684 BIBB AND ASSoCIATES, INC. PROFESSTONAL & SPECIALTZED S 21863 85685 21437 85679 vEIZADES & ASSOCIATES, Iltc. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZEO S 21576 85680 PEEK TRAFFIC PROFESS IOI{AL & SPECIALIZED S PROFESS IONAL & SPECIALIZED S PEGGY FALLON CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AUTO D I ESEL ELECTRIC INC, FIRE APPANATUS i.IAIIIT. C!NGULAR LIIRELESS coirlruN I cAT toNs GMAC PAYI.IENT PROCESSING CETITER I'I I SC. SUPPLIES ARCH UINELESS co, ,{uN I cAT I 0N S cor,ffluN I cAT t oN s Z.A.P. MAiIUFACTURING TRAFF I C CONTROL I'IATERIALS 1,625.14 417.16 101 66210 210 320 80231 210 't01 662'10 160 527 66520 160 160.00 101 58010 220 1645 14,110.50 320 79411 210 91.25 101 65200 203 8r.16 526 69020 160 1,223.37 1O1 65400 120 23r.00 101 64400 115 3,96r.00 320 80510 210 843.11 10',t 66'100 120 NUI.,IBER NAME 85677 85678 85681 85686 45687 85689 85690 21317 21648 22006 22089 2217a 22191 ?2249 ROBERTS ANO BRUTIE }I I SC, SUPPLIES 85688 ALLAII RIDLEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES a13.76 526 69020 120 1C r.00 101 68010 220 1660 2r.52 101 66210 222 3,8s3.95 327 78535 210 UNDERGROU}ID CONSTRUCTIOI{ I{ANAGER 22305 PROIESSIO}IAL & SPECIALIzED S 85691 NORTH AMERICAX SPORTS MANAGEI.4ENT 22382 CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES 21C.00 '101 68010 220 1785 59.16 29.57 210.00 ,. NUiIEER NAI.IE 85663 ANG NE!'SPAPERS PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85664 IMAGEMAX, Il'lC. MISC. SUPPLIES 85665 BURTONIS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS }IAINT. 85666 I.JILSEY & HAM PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85667 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85668 C.H. BULL COMPA}IY SI,IALL TOOLS 85669 DAPPER T I RE CO. , I litg . SUPPL I ES 85670 DANIEL IILLES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85671 CATHERINE J,I.I. NILMEYER },I I SCELLA}IEOt,lS 85672 SPORTS CHOICE MISC. SUPPLIES UNIFORMS AND EOUIPMENT 85673 DUDLEY PERKINS CO. I,I I SCELLANEOI.JS 85674 RENEE RAMSEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85675 OUICK i,IIX CONCRETE SIDEI.'ALK REPAIR EXPENSE 85676 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC DEPOSIT REFUND CITY OF BURLI}IGAMEI.IARRAilT REGISTER 10/ 11 /02 VENDOR DEIAI Lr*r Denotes Hand tlritten Checks 19083 161.?8 156.21 19145 ACCOUNT 101 64200 150 320 79400 220 101 68010 120 101 68010 140 PAGE 4 AMOUNT 317.52 1 ,335 .00 66.39 1 ,495.90 1 ,500 .90 341.10 801.10 1 00. 00 450 .00 9,202.34 2,098.49 600.00 307.32 1 20.00 19356 19397 20060 20459 20464 ?0616 20801 20845 20898 21136 21140 21160 8,625 .37 576.97 1,335.00 101 64400 120 66.39 625 65213 203 1,495.80 320 80600 210 1,300.90 320 80510 220 311.10 101 66240 130 801 .10 620 15000 100.00 101 68010 ?20 1660 450.00 73't 22525 781 892 2,088.48 6'.t8 64520 604 600.00 307.32 101 66210 219 101 68010 220 1331 120.00 Tsl 22590 85648 85619 85650 85651 85652 85653 8555/. 85655 85656 85658 GERBOTH FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. 14021 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S DEUEY PEST CONTROL RAT CONTROL PROGRAI4 CIIY OF BURLIIIGAI.IE},ARRANT REGISTER 10t11t02 VE}IDOR D€TAILr*r oenotes |land lrritten Checks ACC0U T 233.92 619 64460 210 5180 1,662.A0 101 66210 218 51.13 l0l 65200 1'10 108.83 10'l 68010 ,l20 1111 3,155.40 101 65100 220 18.00 tot 68010 120 1787 70.00 101 68010 220 1787 1e.6? 101 68010 120 1330 61e.19 101 68020 140 2200 1,506. 89 620 't5000 71777.25 320 80510 210 BCc.01 101 68010 120 1784 210.00 101 68010 220 1660 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 233.92 4,662.00 54.11 108.83 3,455 .40 ,/.8,00 70.00 19.62 619 .19 1 ,506.89 7,777.25 800.01 240.00 D I SCOUI.IT SCH@L SUPPLY I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 85657 Cr NrAS CoRP. #464 UN I FORI.4S AND EOUIPMENT RECHARGE I EM OFFICE EXPENSE SAN I{ATEO LOCK !]ORKS I.I I SC. SUPPLIES ALL CITY I,IAIIAGEiIENT CO}ITRACTUAL SERVICES PENINSULA ASA I.I I SC. SUPPLIES JOSEPH I'I LL IAI.I MCCLAIN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STATE OF CAL I FORN IA SUPPLIES ROYAL }'HOLESALE ELECTRIC I,I I SC. SUPPL I ES S}IALL TOOLS -25 .10 69 .11 101 66240 120 101 66210 130 14338 11523 14613 14855 15595 15701 16066 16160 16911 16919 1868485659KLEINTELDER, INC PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85660 85661 ACCESS UIII FORI.IS & EMBROIDERY 14I SC. SUPPLIES PEGGY GUARALDI CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18990 19014 85662 GOETZ BROTHERS }I I SC. SUPPLIES 12.14 101 68010 120 1781 42.11 NU}I8ER NAIIE 43.71 19045 8'633 ROI.IDA CAI NE ALCANTARA TRAVEL & I.IEETI}IGS CITY OI BURLINGAI4E!/ARRA}IT REGISTER 10/11/02 VENDOR DEIAI L '*r Denotes Hand tJritten Checks NUMBER NAI.iE 45634 PACI FIC NURSERIES MISC. SUPPLIES 85635 PERSONAL AUARDS, Ir,rC. I,i I SC. SUPPLIES 85637 85638 85639 85641 8r642 85643 85644 85645 ACCOUNT 1,31a.61 101 65100 250 282.75 320 78190 120 163.51 101 68010 120 't784 116.25 101 6€010 220 1614 2,486 -77 21,726.11 101 6a010 120 1122 731 2?56? 51.94 101 68020 110 2300 3,000.00 101 64250 111 55.21 l0l 54350 210 80.00 101 68010 220 1660 1,0e7.67 731 22550 81.23 101 66210 219 2,880.00 101 65100 291 371.50 101 68020 120 2200 3,000. o0 618 61520 601 02873 03041 03145 05235 03471 03600 05821 03964 090/r8 09073 09133 09159 09518 PAGE 2 AI,4OUN T 1 ,340.61 2A2.75 163 .51 116.25 24,212.91 3,000.00 55 .21 80.00 1,097.67 81 .23 2,880.00 371.30 3,000.00 45636 DOROTNY RADYK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES U S POSTAL SERVICE I,I I SCELLANEOUS SAN i.IATEO UIIION HIGH MISC. SUPPLIES SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT TEE HAAG N HAAG OFFICE EXPENSE ROEERT GOOOI.IAN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STATE OT CAICO}ISERVAT I ON OEPT t.I I SCELLANEOUS LYIIGSO GARDEN I,IATERIALS S IOE!/ALK REPAIR EXPENSE SAII UATEO COUNTY SIIERTFF'S OFC. PRISONER EXPEIISE SIERRA PACI FIC TURF SUPPLY MISC. SUPPLIES 8'646 ABAG - LIABILITY CLAII'IS PAYI.IENTS 60 3,574 103 15 00 69 77 47 85647 INTERSTAIE TRAFTIC t.I I SC. SUPPLIES TRAFTIC CONTROL I.4ATERIALS TRAI H I NG EXPENSE I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 09790 4,083.93 51.94 85640 I.'EST GROUP PAYiIENT CTR. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 09143 101 66210 ',t 20 101 66210 222 101 68020 260 2300 526 69020 120 IIUI,48ER NAI,IE 85621 85622 45624 85628 45629 85630 85631 CITY OF BURLINGA}IEL'ARRANT REGTS]ER 10t11t02 VEXDOR DETAI L '*r Denotes Hard Uritten Checks PAGE'1 AI'IOUNT 1 ,380.88 75 0 .00 85.90 31 ,437 .57 1 ,262.55 3,485.00 20,399.00 5 ,099.71 65 .13 1 ,530.23 265 .65 LEXISNEXIS I.IATTHE!] BENOER OFF I CE EXPEIISE 85623 BREr,rTo|,r sAtETY, r c. TRAIIiII]G EXPENSE BURL I NGAI.{E ELEI.I. SCHOOL DIST. SCX@L DEVELOPiiENT FEE 45625 85626 BURLINGAI,4E RECREAT ION DEPT. RECREATION EXPEIISES 85527 ACCOUNT 38.84 16.23 I ,236.59 49,22 750.00 101 64200 110 31,437.57 731 2?563 24.55 5 .25 168.01 1,061.72 3,485.00 101 10700 300.00 20,099.00 621 61150 160 621 61150 220 GRAY I S PAINT, BURLIIIGATIE TRAFF I C CONTROL MATERIALS OTFICE EXPENSE MISC. SUPPLIES I.I I SC. SUPPLIES 101 66210 222 320 80790 110 320 80790 120 619 64460 1?0 5110 01025 01312 0't100 01500 01507 01663 01862 02160 02261 02645 BURL I IIGAI{E AUTO SUPPLY GAS, OIL & GREASE VEIIICLE IIAINT. FIRE APPARATUS }IAINT. SUPPL IES '101 65200 20'1 101 65200 202 101 65200 203 620 15000 CITY OF REOL/OOD CI TY co,0{uN I car I 0!l s CI TY HALL MAIIITENAIICE CORPORATE ENVIRONI.IENTS, INC., MISC. SUPPLIES CAPITAL EOUIPI.{ENT 916.15 4,153.55 320 80580 120 80580 800 30.82 18.78 15.53 101 68020 ',I10 101 64400 120 320 79102 120 236.07 1 ,291.16 101 66210 219 101 66210 226 FEDERAL EXPRESS OFFICE EXPE}iSE HISC. SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES GRANITE ROCK COI,4PAIIY S IOE!]ALK REPAIR EXPENSE STREET RESURFACI XG EXPENSE K & I,' DISCOUNT IIGHTING & SUPP UISC. SUPPLIES 265.65 101 66240 120 85632 MANPOI,'ER TE}.IPORARY EI.IPLOYiIENT SVC. 02819 768.00 101 65300 01'l 768.00 85.90 527 66520 260 01992 STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED iig'#?^ eh MTG. DATE December 2,2002 DATE: November 20r2002 FRoM: Gordon Gottsche BY BY APPROVED SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF THE NEWSRACK CO MEMBERS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council appoint the following individuals to the Newsrack Committee: Earl Walker (Chronicle) to a term ending January l,2006 Tony Abizeid (San Mateo Times) to a term ending January 1, 2005 David Watson (Bay Guardian) to a term ending January 1, 2005 BACKGROUND: City Council, at its September 18. 2000 meeting, approved a revision to the City's Newsrack Ordinance. Section 12.23.O3O of the Ordinance calls for the establishment of a Newsrack Committee and defines its responsibilities. Committee members, representing three publications, serve three year terms, staggered and overlapped in such a manner that the terms of one member expires each year. The Ordinance also requires that the committee members represent daily, weekly and monthly or other publications. Appointing the above individuals to the committee will fulfill the above requirements. Earl Walker, representing a daily publication, was the first applicant for the committee and thus chosen to receive the three-year term. Tony Abizeid, representing an "othe/' publication (the Daily Journal is published six times each week), was the second applicant for the committee. David Watson would filI the seat representing weekly publications. ATTACHMENTS: None. BUDGET IMPACT: No major impact is foreseen. AGENDA 9i STAFF REPORT #ITEM MTG. DATE 12l2l02 TO: Honorahle Meyor nnrl City Corrncil DATE: Novemher 22^ 200? FROM:R. Schwartz - Parks & Recreation Director (6s0) ss8-7307 SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Vacancy RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council appoint John Webb, Jr., to fill the vacancy of Youth Commissioner on the Parks and Recreation Commission. BACKGROUND For the past couple of years, John Webb, Jr., has served as a member of the Youth Advisory Committee. Based on the recommendations of Chairman Larios and Commissioner Warden, the Parks and Recreation Commission, at the November 2l't meeting, voted unanimously to recommend John for this appointment. Cify of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept. 850 Burtingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 phone: (650) 558-7300 . fax: (650) 696-7216 recreation@.burlingame. or g PARKS & RECREATION GOMMISSION YOUTH COMMISSIONER CANDIDATE APPLIGATION NorE:AilappricaliJffi :,tn:?""J'JJlL'5il'$,,rof Burrinsame Position is held from September to June The youth commissioners advise the Parks and Recreation Commission on matters relating to the youth and teen population within the City of Burlingame. This may include programs relating to safety, recreation, drug awareness, speciat interests, sports, community involvement, socialization, and environmental concerns. The Parks and Recreation Commission meets the 3rd Thursday of every month at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. You must be available to attend these meetings. Nam T".Date of Birth: aq - Zc;-€e Address: 72o f*.u^A Au^r Home phone@su) Z ?2_?z +a Email: C*r.-- //A t . eu,-,.SChOOI: t-or,ue.t*, /r.r, Length of Residence in Burlingame:lO rr*or Grade: i / What community or school activities are you presently involved in, or have been active in during the past five years? tla 7#{ F*sr Frt { Yrtas i gila R.rrr,/nt{ <ru tag{ Over fuCy P/zErtoEir{ r- B-er,n,€un{ , A)7Tan€p, - 6€4oo. LhF,rr T sr fll€ YctTH ArtttsoF? (rait-r,-4 F.q4 , Fa,t rn , ,4s.-re-rc rs DoLktuG 'n ntf, Ctf? ThAouc't*'7ldPa x .o a*rorirroar Of&aTnEtn PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION YOUTH COMMISSIONER CANDIDATE APPLICATION Page 2 \A/hy do you want to be a youth member of the Parks and Recreation Commission? [,e]/S t? To ,a+ <rt c rp-a rf fi) fE ftu rt c < o E f#t SJtr'r4? <'n/. /.1 \Athat do you think you could contribute to the Parks and Recreation Commission? I B;t,sre Tus / c,#{EF4Esao,t f' THr Ag,racf *fttJ,.,to,t?$.- *h*,r 15 + {,D,e P- /4,JTL/7tt*T F/t'tlt-< ,=,, " t**tl i lr f:Ettzttz:;. ivf z)'LL !rJ..? 8{ <-t *y.d, RY 'i +i- t) FtnU / otu .f Date u&, /0 '30* e -7.Signature: Completed applications should be retunred to the Prls & Recreation Dept., 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010. Applications will be accepted until vacancies are filled. For more information, please contact Randy Schwartz at (650) 558-7300. You will be notified by phone for m oral interview date and time. ,* (tTy *.'F 8-o Ltdcr+tul f '77//atk Ttt*f 'Ti+tr ri*y ,3 et . I i ,r*r {)Fvott't ts 4 Qaz,tetAtrD TrQdl uotta *ruD I BFtiEu{ T,uiT I a,+P i F atr ttgi,ts ,ar; ./L\4TTE * lta .a, n,+pt{ Crilfu -: o,.-p-: t El .frtl - STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: November26,,2002 AGENDA ITEM # MTG. DATE t2l2l02 ej SUBMITTED BY FRoM: James Nantell, CitY Manager BY 650-ss8-7204 suBJECT: 2002Year End Review of City Manager's Performance RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council schedule a Closed Session with the City Manager on Monday, December 9th at 4:00 p.m. in City Hall Conference Room A. BACKGROUND: As the Council knows, to ensure good communications with the Council and the City Manager regarding his performance the Council holds both a mid year and end of the year meeting relative to performance. The Council held the mid year meeting in July, which was continued to a second meeting in August. Now is the time to conduct the year end discussion. The nature of the meeting allows for a closed session to maximize the ability of the parties to be as candid as possible. To facilitate for the discussion the attached performance feedback forms have previously been distributed to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Performance Feedback Forms If possible please complete this ancl return to "lirn befrrrc 5:0{)p.rn. 'fuesrlay. December 4hzaaT. Part I. General Management On a scale of l-4, please rate the manager's performance over the past six months on the following performance dimensions : 1 )3 4 Unacceptable Not meeting most expectations Marginal Performance often below expectaion improvement needed Good Meets most expectations Outstanding Meets all and exceeds some expectations Dimensions Rating 1 Creativity 2 Following Council direction J Demonstrates desire and effort to be aware of what is happening in the community. 4 Capable of following and adapting to changes and dynamics of the community and Council 5 Offers multiple options for problems and issues 6 Ability to implement programs/policies that reflect community needs and consensus building. l Demonstrates integrity and honesty in dealing with Council, organization and community. 8 Financially responsible 9 Demonstrated success in leading the city organrzation towards the goals established by the council. 10 Overcoming obstacles which hinder achievement of the council's goals 11 Maintaining credibility with the public t2 Keeping the council informed on the status of major issues 13 Able to create and articulate a vision for the organization t4 Sets a positive example for the organization 15 Communicate, communicate and communicate with the council and staff Note: If needed add comments and the number(s) of the dimension(s) they pertain to City Manager Year End Review November 2002 IV. Future Planning This is information for the manager to take into account for the next six-month rating period. It is not part of the bonus and therefore would not be included in the calculation at the end of the performance year bonus. l. What things the manager does well and should continue doing: 2. What things this manager should start or stop doing or improve upon (by doing more, less, or differently): 3. What would you like to see me focus on in the coming six months? Retum to Jim by Tuesday December 4th. BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY Burllngame Publlc Llbrary Board of Trustees Minutes October 15r2OO2 L Call to Order The meeting of October 15, 2OO2 was called to order by the Secretary Katie McCormack at 4:30 pm. [. Roll Call{Trustees Present: Trustee Absent: Staff Present: Cecile Coar, Catherine McCormack, Mary Herrnan and Carol Rossi Andrew Gurthet Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder III Warrants and Speclal Funds The Trustees unanimgusly agreed to approve the warrants. M/S/C (Herman/Rossi) \ IV. Minutes The Trustees unanimously agreed to.approve the minutes of the September L7, 2OO2 meeting. M/ S/C (Herman/Coar) V. Correspondence Correspondence mailed in the packets was reviewed. A. Proposed Reduction of Library Schedule - The City Librarian and the Trustees discussed the proposal for a reduction of library hours from 73 hours to 66 hours for the year 2003. Library hours would be Monday-Friday 10:00am to 9:00am, Saturday 10:00am to 5:00pm with Sunday hours remaining the same 1:00 - Spm. Implementation of this schedule would result in a total savings of $83,095.1. Library hours could be restored if the economy improved, as this would be considered a temporary reduction. 48o WrmroseRoad. Burlinqame. CA 94oro- 4o83 Phone (65o) 558-7 47 4' F a (65o) 342-6295 tl H tr E E E - -vl.-_E -- 7 ry u. VII 2. The trustees requested that terminolory be included in the proposal that would allow them to review the budget at a later date. 3. Trustee Rossi suggested weekly hours from 9:30am to 8:30pm be considered due to a 10:00am story time and with so many people job hunting, earlier Internet access would be helpful. 4. Trustee Herman requested that the library conduct a patron survey before the next Library Trustee meeting regarding the change in open hours from 1O:00am to 9:00pm or 9:30am to 8:30pm. 5. Further potential budget cuts are being discussed by the library managers and will possibly include reduction in the collection expenditures, as well as not filling recently vacated positions. 6. Suggested budget cuts from all departments are to be given to the City Manager at the end of October for review and will then be brought before the City Council who will make the final determination of which budget reductions will be implemented in early Januar5r. From the Floor - No one from the public attended Reports A. City Librarian's Report - A1 Escoffier, City Librarian, reviewed his report highlighting the following issues. 1. Dan Stone Memorial - The first Dan Stone Memorial Author's series for children featuring Paul Fleichman was very successful and the family has pledged a $ 2,000 donation for next year's program. 2. Easton Branch Renovation - The architects are working on the structural design, as well as having initial meetings on interior finishes, colors and lighting. 3. Friends Book Sale - The two day book sale netted approximately $t,500.B. Foundation Report - Carol Rossi 1. Elegant Affair Branches Out - The event will be held October 19th. Reservations have been increasing everyday and there are 160 guests to date. Library Board of Trustee Minutes October 15,2002 2 VIII. IX Unfinished Business A. Community Room Policy Review - This matter was tabled until the November 19th meeting. B. Employee Achievement Award Process - Trustee Herman made a motion that the two Trustees overseeing the Employee Achievement Awards be given the authority to select the winners and present them to the Trustees at the November meeting. M/S/C (Herman/Rossi) New Business A. Library Closure Schedule 2OO2-2OO4 - As a budget saving measure of approximately $ 1,600 in salaries, the City Librarian has proposed closing all day on Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve. The library is normally open 4 hours on each of those days. Human Resources will have to clear closing of these additional hours, as it will require staff to take 8 hours of vacation. The Trustees will vote on the Library Closure Schedule at the November meeting. B. Increase of Fines and Fees - The City is strongly requesting that the library raise its rates on overdue items. Adult fines would be increased to $ .ZS and Children's fines to $ .15. 1. The present Fine system is county wide and unless PLS increases fines across the board, Burlingame Library would have to recode its 300,000 materials. Overnight processing would take longer, as the system would be running two different fee calculations. 2. Trustee McCormack suggested waiting for a period of time and then instituting a larger increase for adults and less for children. 3. Interlibrary Loans will increase from $3.00 - $5.00.4. Charging for use of the Internet could cost more to manage than revenues collected. 5. A system to monitor Internet printing is still under consideration. 6. Increases in fines and fees will be reviewed by the Trustees over the next few months. Announcements The Library has 5 tables for the Author's Luncheon sponsored by the Kidney Foundation. The Foundation is sponsoring a bus for the event. Library Board of Trustee Minutes October 15,2002 3 x. XII. Adiournment The meeting adjourned at 5:45pm. M/S/C (Herman/Coar) The next meeting of the Library Board of Trustees is scheduled for November 19, 2OO2 at 4:30pm in the Library Conference Room. Respectfully Submitted 0/h./fr, Alfred H. City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes October 15,2002 4 BIIRLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 7. 2OO2 The regularly scheduled meeting ofthe Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by ChairpersonMcGowan. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff: Chairperson McGowan, Carney, Ellis, Lauder, Locke, and Webb Commissioner Hesselgren Superintendent Richmond and Administrative Secretary Harvey MIIYUTES - The minutes of the October 3,2002 meeting were approved as submitted. CORRESPOIIDENCE Letter to Larry & Veronica Morsello, 1353 Bernal Avenue, informing them that the Commission unanimously denied the Appeal ofthe Decision to Remove a Two Black Acacias and One Palm Tree in the back yard of t 108 CortezAvenue and that the permit would be issued ifthere were no appeals to the Council before October 21,2002. Copy of Burlineame Waterfront Park proposal submitted by Commissioner John Webb for Commission review and discussion at the November 7ft Commission meeting. Commissioner Applications for the Beautification Commission from Dorothy Katz and Laura Hesselgren Letter(s) fr-om Mayor Janney informing Laura Hesselgren and John Webb oftheir reappointment(s) to the Burlingame Beautification Commission. FROM THE FLOOR There were no comments from the floor NEW BUSII\-ESS Pur.lineame Bavfront Specific Area Plan Update and BurlinsameWaterfront Park Discussion - Chairperson McGowan reported that the Bayfront Advisory Committee met; John Webb *ar atso in attendance, but only as a Burlingame citizen. Chairperson McGowan reported that City Planner Monroe made a presentation to the Committee as to what the existing plan is for the bay front area. Following her presentation, the Committee broke into four groups to discuss different ideas for the area. Various ideas were discussed such as: residential use on the South end with a marina; completingbay front pedestrian and bike trails; more hotels as a source for increased revenue; developing a shoreline park and developing a more upscale look to Old Bayshore and Broadway. Commissioner Webb commented that putting a Community Center was mentioned on the State Lands property, just South of Kincaids Restaurant. He suggested that the waterways could also be enhanced and redesigned which could be a draw to the hotels in the area. He added that this area is the last open space in Burlingame. Then, Commissioner Webb presented plans of the bay front area submitted during a "Charette" several years ago. 1 NEW BUSII{ESS - Burlineame Bayfront Specific Area Plan Update and Burlineame Waterfront Park Discussion - (Cont'd.) The Commission looked at the plans and discussed the possibilities of a Community Center/Shoreline Park in the State Lands area. Following the discussion, the Commission asked Chairperson McGowan to present the following ideas to the Bayfront Advisory Committee: l) The State Lands (ust South of Kincaids Restaurant) could become a green, open space with the planting of native seaside plants and and should include deciduous and evergreen trees, a portion of the shoreline should be returned to native wetlands; 2) A Community Center could also be included in the area to generate revenue; and 3) Replacing the shoreline walls that are failing would enhance the area and diminish liabilities. 4) On Old Bayshore Q{orthern Section); the planting of trees and plants in the medians would generally, overall enhance the area. Chairperson McGowan said the next Bayfront Advisory Committee will be on November l9m at City Hall and further information can be found on the City ofBurlingame website; all are invited to attend. REPORTS Richmond - 1) The Fall tree planting is occurring - 8l trees are scheduled for planting. 2) The City Arborist has confirmed that there are fewer trees at the Rector site than were in the original planting. The City Arborist will be contacting Rector and will convey the Commission's concerns. 3) The tree at 212 Stanley has been soil injected with Merit for aphid eradication. But because ofthe narrow planting strip and limited injection points, this method at this site has not been successful. The property owner has complained numerous times and has would like the tree removed. In anticipation that this may be placed on a future agenda, Superintendent Richmond asked Commission to visit the site at their convenience. 4) The Parks Division continues to receive periodic complaints re: height that street trees are raised over City streets to conform to CalTrans standards. Through the new grid pruning process, the City's tree crew has raised approximately 213 of the City's street trees according to CalTrans standards. 5) The Arbor Day location has not yet been set. Superintendent Richmond encouraged the Commission to call him at the Parks office with any suggestions. McGowan - Chairperson McGowan noted that the Mayten trees at the apartment building at the corner of Ansel and Floribunda, have died and need replacing. Chailperson McGowan reported that at the south end ofthe Broadway Train Station parking lot, the Escalonias are growing high and block egress view of oncoming traffic and the Scotch Broom by the cyclone fence in the same area needs to be trimmed. Superintendent Richmond will inspect area. Chairperson McGowan congratulated Commissioners Hesselgren and Webb on their reappointments to the Commission. 2 REPORTS -(Cont'd.) Lauder - Commissioner Lauder reported that she attended the I0l Auxiliary Lane & Interchange Meeting. Meeting involved discussions regarding adding: an additional lane, a pedestrian bridge from Broadway towards Airport Boulevard; adding a pedestrian bridge from Morrell over to Anza Boulevard. Commissioner Lauder concluded that the Auxiliary lane and the pedestrian path has been funded but the interchange has not been funded and funding for that could be l0 years away; any changes to the interchange would not affect the existing landscaping. Commissioner Lauder spoke with Arnold Joe; he is in receipt of the Adopt-A-Highway application and was very positive with her and Commissioner Locke's plan. Locke- Commissionerlocke attendedthe communityworkshopregardingNorthBurlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plans and stated that some of the streetscape goals are relevant to the Beautification as well as the visual entry points to the City (Rollins Road at Broadway and Trousdale and Murchison). She noted that further information can be found on the City's website and that the next meeting was scheduled for December 3'd. Commissioner Locke noted that the landscaping on the side of the Golf Center (facing Highway I 0 1) does not look good and could be improved if natural shrubs were planted. There being no further business, Chairperson McGowan adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary J , The City of Burlingame CITY HALL. 5O1 PRIMROSE ROAD CALTFOBN|A 94010-3997 www. burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, Novembe r 14, 2002 Commissioners Present: Jim Mclver, Chair Lisa De Angelis Stephen Warden Commissioners Absent: Russ Cohen David Mayer StaffPresent: StaffAbsent: Visitors: Frank Erbacher, Assistant Public Works Director Augustine Chou, Traffc Engineer, Public Works Dawn Cutler, Traffic Sergeant, Police Deparhent Doris Mortensen, Administrative Secretary, Public Works Martin Liebermarq 1600 Westnnoor Road, Burlingame Gil Bair, 1700 Ray Drive, Burlingame Helen Bair, 1700 Ray Drive, Burlingame Carmen Nielson, 1705 Ray Drive, Burlingame Mike Lennon,ll2S Hamilton Lane, Burlingame Maureen Lennorq 1128 Hamilton Lane, Burlingame Jennifer ShohmanrU 1105 Hamilton Lane, Burlingame David Stone, 1521 Weshnoor Road, Burlingame Larissa Stone, l52l Westnoor Road, Burlingame Roland Gage, I 504 La Mesa Drive, Burlingame John Jones, 810 Blgehill Drive, Burlingame Martha McCormack, 1530 Meadow Lane, Burlingame Ronald Poff, 1978 Rose Lane, Pleasant Hill Joe Diodati,1730 Quesada Way, Burlingame Tony Diodati,1730 Quesada Way, Burlingame Muffie Calbreath, I I 13 Rosedale Avenue, Burlingame Daredjane Thomas, 1527 Eastuoor Road, Burlingame Frank McDermott,1612 Coronado Wan Burlingame Timothy Beary, 2001 Ray Drive, Burlingame Bob Johnston, I133 Killarney Lane, Burlingame TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, November 14, 2002 Visitors (cont'd): t I Janine Poimiroo, 1532 Westnoor Road, Burlingame Jonathan Gemora, llM Dufferin Avenue, Burlingame Jose M. Arteag4 869 California Drive, Burlingame Joseph Marston, 1137 Clovelly I-ane, Burlingame Janet Marston, 1137 Clovelly Lane, Burlingame --F- The City of Burtingann Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFEW AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - UnapProved Thursday, November 14, 2OO2 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL.3 of 5 Cornmissioners present. Staffindicated that Comms. Cohen and Mayer had called days before to say they will be absent. Chair Mclver introduced and welcomed the new Traffic Commissioner, Steve Warden. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.1 ACTION ITEMS. 4.1.1 Approval of Minutes for October 10,20ff2 Comm. De Angelis abstained from approving the minutes since she had not attended the October meeting. The minutes will be submitted for approval at the next meeting. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS. 4.2.1 Hillside Drive uphill of Alvarado Avenue - Additional Speed Controls Mr. Erbacher advised that staffis waiting for County staffto review the speed bump study with the Board of Supervisors at their January meeting. Also, the City does not presenfly have funding available for implementation of any speed bumps. 4.2.2 Request for Speed Humps on Paloma Avenue at McKinley School Mr. Chou stated that staff did field investigations and found that under most conditions, during the day the street is fairly clear, and the rnajo*traffic impact is during school drop-off hours. Staff is not looking to use speed humps within the City Limits at this time. Comm. Warden suggested requiring all drop-offs and pick-ups to come from the same direction. Mr. Chou noticed that vehicles are being parked in the white zone rather than for loading and unloading passengers. Comm. De Angelis stated that committees were fonned at another school site to work out traffic issues. Sgt. Cutler stated that the School Liaison Officer should also be involved. 4.2.3 Millbrae BART Station - Parking Impacts on Crty streets - Possible Parking Restrictions - Residential Area Mr. Erbacher discussed the various BART accesses and ttrat BART is providing about 3,000 spaces on site. According to BART's parking study, since this station will accommodate passengers for BART, Caltrain, SamTrans and the airport, they believe they will be providing adequate parking. The City of Budingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFEry AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, November 1 4, 2002 From the floor, Ms. McCorrrack is concerned about more cars parking on Thursday and Friday when they have garbage pickup and street sweeping. Mr. Lieberrnan stated that the Caltrain station in Millbrae is filled up now and is concerned it will be used by BART passengers. He also requests stickers on residents' cars to be able to park in the neighborhood. Mr. Iohnston stated that the BART issue was discussed about two years ago at Burlingame Interrnediate School. He doesn't want Permit Parking signs posted; he had wanted Council to ask BART for concessions to prevent parking problems in this area. Chair Mclver reminded everyone that, early on, BART parking was expected to be free; however, we now know they will be charging for parking which will potentially have a heavier impact on parking on City streets. Ms. Poimiroo asked about post- parking studies at other BART stations; she was also concerned about her overnight guests being able to park on the street. Mr. J. Diodati asked what BART will charge for parking. It is expected to be $3 a day. Ms. Calbreath stated there are not enough garages for all residents to park off the street. She would like parking permits for residents to park. Comm. Warden suggested if parking does impact on-street parking, perhaps BART could build a two-story garage where the open space parking exists on their site. Mr, T. Diodati zuggested $60 citations for BART users parking on City streets. Mr. Marston was concerned about cars parking on street cleanhg days and believes most of the BART parking impact will affect the Burlingame Plaza Shopping Center. Comm. Warden commented that BART Directors are elected, and he would like to invite the director that represents this area to a public meeting. Mr. Erbacher advised that San Mateo County is not rqlresented on the BART board, and BART will not make a commitrrent. Also, the BART parking charge is still not yet approved. Comm. De Angelis suggests sending a memo to Council advising that we have had these BART parking impact meetings, that we invited over 5,000 residents and businesses asking for their input, that the we will include the number of people who attended our meetings; and provide the feedback. Since we don't know what the impacts will be in two years, this Commission is unable to ma!g: any specific recommendations at this time. Mr. Erbacher advised that at the next meetitrg, he will provide a draft report to Council for the Commissioners to review. 4.2.4 Request for Green Zone - 1 Hour Parking Limit at 809 California Drive Mr. Chou stated that the main concem is that this site has no quick turnover customer parking spaces because the available on-street parking is used for extended times. Limited time parking at this site would be consistent with some of the other blocks on this street. From the floor, Mr. Iones stated he also has problems with vehicles being left for extended times with "For Sale" sigos on them. Mr. Arteaga of 869 California Drive also voiced a complaint about vehicles being parked for extended times in an existing green zone by his business. Mr. Chou recommends some form of limited time parking rather than a green zone since green zones are difficult to enforce because the time allotted is only 20 minutes. Cornm. De Angelis stated we need to look at some of these problems on a more global view so that we don't fx problems piecemeal. She feels the City would have more consistent enforcement if all parking limitatiotrs on this street were uniform. Mr Chou stated staff needs to do a more intense study The AV of Budi,Eiene Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, November 1 4, 2002 of this area to determine the use of short term parking and see what parking times are optimal. Sgt. Cutler stated that enforcement is better managed if all parking time limits were at I or 2 hours in this location. 4.2.5 Request for Green Zone -30 Minute Parking Limit at 828 Mahler Road Mr. Chou advised there is off-street parking available for this site. He also stated tlat the main concertr of the request had to do with the occupants noticing that a number of limousines were being parked for ext€nded times on Mahler Road. Staff has since spoken to the owner of the limo service and the vehicles have been moved. Staff noted that only one or two spaces are available for limited parking which would not be suffrcient for this site's needs. Staff will work with the new business to facilitate a solution for parking on site, rather than on street. From the floor, Mr. Poff stated the majority of their customers take less than 10 minutes to complete their business. He aiso stated that some repair trucks and other vehicles have been parked on thb' street for up to eight hours at a time. Staff concluded that there seems to be ample parking in the back of the property, but re-stiping might be needed. 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. 6. FROM THE FLOOR.- No Comments. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS. 7.1 From Staff to Commission 7.1.1 Traffic Engineer's Report Mr. Chou advised that the illuminated crosswalk/handicap ramp project on California Drive at I-ortca Avenue is in the design stage with a completion date for the end of Dryember. The Carrnelita/Morrell traffic signals still have fine-nrning work to be implemenifr to effect a smoother flow of traffic through the intersection. 7. 1.2 Staff Action Log - Attached. 7.1.3 Burlingame Parking Study Mr. Chou advised that staff met with the consulta , Wilbur Smith Associates, to review their comparison against the previous strrdy. In 1999 we had a certain level of occupancy in the City's parking lots near Burlingame Avenue and it dropped in 2000. In the past year it has riseo again to the 1999 occupancy level. The corrparison study indicates that the parking meter rate fuErease has not had a significant impact on the level of use. The free lot occupancy has also risen. The final study will be presented to Council in December, and this Commission will see the study in January. The City ol Bu,ringane Page 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, November 1 4, 2002 7.2 From Commission to Staff 7.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests Chair Mclver stated some businessmen on Broadway suggested that the designated 2-hour and l0- hour parking spaces at Lot P (between Paloma and laguna) be moved around so that the 2-hour spaces can be better utilized by the short-term parkers. Staff will look into this. 7.2.2 Comnents and communication - None. 7.2.3 Expectd absences of Commissiorers at the Thursday, December 12, 20(D meeting - None. 8. INACTIVE ITEMS. 8.1 Request for traffrc control on Dwight Road - Phase I Gateway Lnprovements Mr. Erbacher advised that the gateway is aknost completed. 8.2 Petition from Bayswater & Howard residents requesting a traffic study of area to determine if tratric-calming measures warranted This item is on hold for the TrafFrc Qalming Program. Sergeant Cutler submitted the Sekuive EnJorcement Repor, which shows 12 citations iszued. 8.3 1007 Chula Vista Avenue - Irtter requesting Speed Limit SigDage for Traffre4alming effect to constrain speeding drivers This item is on hold for the Traffic Calming Program. 8.4 Request for speed limit and truck weight limit enforcement, a traffic signal on Trousdale Drive at Skyline Boulevard, STOP sign on Trousdale Drive at Loyola Drive and STOP sign on Trousdale at Quesada Way. Results of Traffic Daa Gathering - Speed limits Sergeant Cufler submitted the Seleaive Et{orcement Repon wlich shows 22 citations issud. She advised that enforcement has been prolific for months now and there is still a problem and believes a survey will still show the speed is too high to lower the signed speed. She will provide major enforcement prior to a survey being perfonned to see if the speed will be affected. 8.5 Howard Avenue - Speed and Trucks (e-mail) The City of Bulingame Page 6 This item is on hold for the Traffic Cakning Program. 8.6 1300 Block ofVancouver Avenue - Speed Concerns (petition) This item is on hold for the TrafEc Cakning Program. 8.7 Request to Review Speed Concerns on Hillside Drive Mr. Chou advised that data is still being gathered to provide Sergeant Cutler submitted the Seleaive Enforcement Reporr which shows 5 citations issued. 9. AGENDIZE FOR TIIE NEXT MEETING. 4.2.3 Preparc a summary of comments from the public to prepare a report to Council 4 .2 .4 to Discussion Item 10. ADJOLIRNMENT. 9:30 p.m. The City of Bulingane Page 7 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMTSSTON Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, November 14, 2OO2 MEETING MINUTES Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, November 21, 2002 The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by Chairman Ed Larios at7:A0 p.m. in Conference Room "N' atBurlingame City Hall. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present:Erickson, Heathcote, Kahn, Larios, Lawson, Minderman, Muller; Youth Commissioner Warden Commissioners Absent: Dittman StaffPresent: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz Others Present: None MINUTES Minutes of the October 17, 2002 regular meeting of the Commission were approved as submiued. OLD BUSITI-ESS A. Temporary Teen Center Update Director Schwartz informed the commissioners that the City Council, at the October 21't meeting, unanimously approved the City's entering into a lease agreement for the properly at 783 California Drive to be used as a Teen Center until a permanent Community Center can be constructed. During the frrst five months of the two-year lease, payrnents will be at half the discounted rate and the City may cancel the lease with five days notice at any time during that period. A fundraising committee is being formed to raise $400,000 in cash or in-kind contributions to allow the Center to operate for the first two years. Commissioner Heathcote, a member of the fundraising committee, stated that24 or 25 teens attended a meeting on November 16e at the Teen Cenier. He was encouraged by the group's potential. As we begin the fund-raising portion of the project, the energy of the students will be very important as will be the participation of their parents and other community adults. Heathcote also spoke about the in-kind contributions being solicited from construction firms. Commissioner Erickson, also a member of the fundraising committee, said that he was very encouraged by the turn-out and wants to work with 4 or 5 teens to create a visible presence at the Holiday Open House on Burlingame Avenue onDecember 6e. His goal is to raise the awareness of the public to the Teen Center and the fundraising effort. The next committee meeting will be held from 6:00 to 7:30 pm at the Recreation Center on Wednesday, December 4to. The pubtic is invited to the meeting. Attendees will be asked to join one of several sub-committees (donations, events, teen conference, rentals, grants) and begin work. Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, November zlt 20OZ - prye 2 Heathcote said that the Teen Center is being looked at as a Pilot Project towards the need for a future Community Center. Commissioner Kahn reported that she has spoken with Mark Lucchessi of Molly Stones and the store is very interested in assisting the project; possibly by donating food and beverages to be sold at the Center. Chairman Larios would like to see the other potential uses of the facility publicized and suggested fundraising boards be posted in the community to increase awareness. Kahn suggested better signage to the facility to increase visibility. The commissioners brainstormed several fundraising ideas and asked to have the notes ofthe two committee meetings included withthese minutes. B. Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) Report Youth Advisory Commissioner Warden ,.po.t.d th. YAC wiil host an att-City dance on November 22"d -at the Recreation Center (students bringing canned food to the event will receive a discount on admission and the food will be donated to Samaritan House); a meeting of various YAC's in the County will be held in Foster City in December; the YAC will be going to a ropes course in February. Director Schwartz pointed out that the YAC has pledged $5,000 to the Teen Center campaign. These funds are the profits from recent dances, food sales, etc. C. Senior Resources Handbook Commissioner Kahn will contact Commissioner Dittman to deterrnine the status of the Senior Resources Handbook and its anticipated publication date. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. NEW BUSINESS A. Youth Commissioner Application An application from John Webb, Jr. to be a Youth Commissioner on the Parks & Recreation Commission was received during the past month. After discussion and based upon the recommendations of Youth Commissioner Warden and Chair:nan Larios, Commissioner Minderman moved to forward John Webb, Jr.'s name to the City Council for appointment as a Youth Commissioner. REPORTS A. Parks & Recreation Department Report - See attached. Commissioners 1. Commissioner Heathcote asked about the status of the Burlingame Golf Center. Director Schwartz reported that, in light of the City's current financial situation, the Ciql will be examining all options for the Golf Center, including restructuring the current contract or potentially closing the facility. Chairman Larios spoke about the tremendous value of the facility to the community, particularly the short game area. Larios stated that other recreational facilities are not looked at in terms of their potential to bring in revenue and that the Golf Center may need to be examined more in terms of its recreational component than its potential as a profit center. B. Parks & Recreation Commission Ihursday, November 21,20A2- page 3 2.Commissioner Muller relayed the appreciation of several members of the public for the City's assistance in improving the facilities at Burlingame High School. C. Revenue Report - See attached. I\-EXT MEETING The Commissioners unanimously agreed to cancel the December meeting due to the holidays. The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission will be a joint meeting with the Parks & Recreation Commissions of Millbrae & San Bruno and will be held on Wednesday, January 8, 2003 at7:00 p.rn. at the San Bruno Community Center. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Randy Schwartz Director of Parks & Recreation CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA November 25,2A02 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the November 25, 2A02, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at7 04 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Keele, and Osterling Absent: Commissioners: Boju6s, Keighran, Vistica Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Erika Lewit; City Attomey, Larry Anderson. IIII. MINUTES The following changes were noted to the minutes of the November 12,2002 :'-11"1#-il?$:i:.'"?ffi l,*:ffiil:l",:read..@ I#ithJ'reurflei$bor Commission gave direction to the neighbors to meet to resolve this issue and come back to the Planning Commission,,, Item #9, page 9, second paragraph insert 'the peninsula Conflict Resolution people could help you craft an agreement which could be the basis for addressing the problem on an on-going basis. The neighbors indicated they would be willing to go to Peninsula Con/lict Resolution." IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that items #6,716 Concord Way, #8 808 Edgehill Drive, and #10, 1755 Bayshore Highway, were continued to the next meeting and would not be heard this evening. V" FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS 512.516 PRIMROSE ROAD, ZONED R-3 - APPLICATION FOR A NEGATTVE DECLARATION, LANDSCAPING VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW EIGHT-UMT, RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM BUILDING (DALE MEYER, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DEN}IAM LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) CP Monroe presented a summary of the staffreport. Commissioners asked: what characteristics of the sitejustify a variance for front setback landscaping; could the applicant explain why they decided not to revise the 10 foot plate heights and 9 foot ceilings. Commissioners noted that Housing Element Implementation Subcommittee has discussed reducing the front landscaping requirements to allow for deliverytruck access. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:19 p.m. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT- RE-DEFINE HEALTH AND BEAUry SPA AS PERSONAL TRAINER AND ASSESSMENT BUSINESS AND BEAUTY SHOPS AS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE 1 2 3a. 3b. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25,2002 CP Monroe presented a suflrmary ofthe staffreport. Commissioners noted a concem with elimination ofthe word "spa" from the code, and asked how will a business that does hair, massage and make-up be defined, would it help to add "personal health" to the proposed term instead of "personal assessment." CP Monroe responded that most spa activities will meet the definition of a "beauty salon" and the term "health" is not used because health services are already defined in the code and are prohibited in the Burlingame Avenue subarea and some portions of the Broadway subarea. This item was set for the next available regular action calendar. This item concluded at7:24 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Itums on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission yotes on the motion to adopt. 26 DWIGHT ROAD _ ZONED R.l - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT E}I'/ELOPE (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; HUGO CURLIOMS. PROPERTY OWNER) (71 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER 405 PRIMROSE ROAD, #310 - ZONED C-1, SUBAREA B- APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HEALTH SERVICE (MARRIAGEIFAMILY THERAPIST) (ROBERTA ANDERSON, APPLICANT; HENRY HORN & SONS, TERRY HORN, PROPERTY OWNERS) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER 3c.835 ATRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 -APPLTCATION FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED MITIGATED NEGATTVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 1.0 FLOOR AREA RATIO, CONDMIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO VARY FROM TIIE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPING REQT]IREMENTS, AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SINGLE-STORY MEETING ROOM SPACE ADDTTION TO AN EXSTING HOTEL (PAUL ZEN, TODAY'S M, INC., APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; GUMBINGER/AVRAM ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (I4 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RIIBEN HURIN Actin$ Chair Osterling asked if anyone inthe audience or on the Commissionwishedto call anyitan offthe consent calendar. There were no requests. C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item ended at7:26p.m. \rIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 4 MARIPOSA COURT - ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR A HEDGE EXCEPTION FOR A 12' HEDGE (GRACE AND ROBERT DUMMEL, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT Reference staffreport ll.25.02,with attachments. Planner Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked stafffrom what 2 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 point is the height of the hedge measured. Staff responded that the hedge is measured from the highest adjacent grade, which in this case is the sidewalk. There.were no further questions of staff. Acting Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Grace Dummel, property owner and applicant, was present to answer questions. Commissioners asked: have you looked into alternative ways to cool the house, such as swamp coolers or shading windows; have you had a landscape professional visit the site to evaluate what area of the roof a taller hedge will shade and would it make a difference in the temperature of the house; what is the current height of the hedge. The applicant responded that she had looked into altematives, but they were expensive; a landscaper had not evaluated the hedge and its shade patterns, but she would be willing to have an evaluation; house gets very hot and is uncomfortable for her husband, who is in poor health; any additional shade is helpful in cooling the house; there was a tree in the central courtyard which was cut down at the neighbors request, she did not rcalize how much a difference the courtyard tree made to the temperature of the house until it was gone; hedge is currently about 9 feet in height. Jim Carey, 931 West Angus, San Bruno, and Sheila Kermani, spoke on behalf of the property owner at 7 Mariposa Court. There are many other alternatives to cooling the house that the neighbor could investigate, such as an insulated roof, ceiling fans, reflective panels and awnings, they submitted a letter and several brochures detailing some ofthese alternatives; attempts have been made to work with the neighbor regarding the hedge and they have failed; in the past their mother had paid to have this hedge trimmed each year. Commission asked: if the hedge is cut to regulation height, is there a view of the bay or is it just a view of the roof at 4 Mariposa Court. It was noted that there is a view of the bay from the sunroom at 7 Mariposa Court ifthe hedge is 5-7 feet in height. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: granting a hedge exception requires a physical hardship on the property and there doesn't appe,Ir to be a hardship for this property; hedge exception findings state that the hedge shall not be injurious to neighboring properties, where in this case the view enjoyed by some neighbors is materially damaged by the over height hedge; not convinced that the hedge, even if allowed to grow to 12 feet,will cast sufficient shade to cool the house; and feel that alternative methods can be found that will be inexpensive and also more efficient at cooling the house. C. Auran moved to deny the application. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Acting Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to deny. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:55 p.m. 5.1537 DRAKE AYENTIE _ ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RE-EMERGENCE OF THREE PARCELS, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ONE ATTACHED GARAGE AND DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT TWO, NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, (OTTO MILLER, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR..INC (58 NOTICED) PROJECT ERIKA LEWIT Reference staff report ll.25.02,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirty-nine conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners noted that hey are concemed with the effectiveness ofthe backflow devices proposed as mitigating measures, and asked iftheir function and effectiveness could be addressed. CP Monroe noted that the devices were recommended by the Public Works Department and are designed to prevent sewage from flowing back into the houses; while they aJ City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes Novernber 25, 2002 are activated sewage does not flow from the site. Commission asked for an explanation of the bond process. CA Anderson explained that a bond is not required for this size development by either City ordinance or state law. Contractor bonds filed with the state are minimal. If the Commission chooses to impose a bond for the protection of the trees, the amount would be based on the construction costs ofprotecting the trees, so that if necessary, an outside party could step in to enforce the protection measures. Another type of bond could be used as a penalty levied against the owner for the value of the trees if they were damaged. A qualified arborist would determine the value of the hees. Acting Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney 2l9ParkRoad, represented the applicant, Otto Miller, property owner, and James Chu, designer, were present to answer questions. Mr. Hudak noted that the sewage problems existing in the neighborhood will be there whether or not three lots are develop ed at 1537 Drake; studies have shown that the new houses will not have a measurable impact on the capacity of the sewer, and the backflow valves would at least offer some improvement to the backup problems experienced by some of the neighbors; the mitigation measures for the hees will be followed by the applicant and he is willing to post a bond to ensure that the workers under his supervision follow the correct procedures during construction; , I terms ofdesign, the two proposed dwellings are well{esigned and quality materials will be used in theid construction, the applicant has worked with the design review consultant to modiff the house on Lot 9; the design review consultant recommends approval ofthe project, stating in his recommendation that the proposed designs provide variety and will be an improve,lnent to the neighborhood. Commission asked: what do you think would be a fair amount for a bond to protect the tees. Mr. Hudak responded that he estimates it would cost $10,000 to implement the mitigation measures, so a multiple of this, such at $25,000, would be more than sufficient if someone else had to do the work. Do not feel a bond should be required because it sets a dangerous precedent and should be imposed on all future development which has species trees; ifthe mitigation measures ire followed and for some reason a free still dies, the owner will be penalized for an act of nature. Janet Garcia, 1531 Drake Avenue; Ann and Mark Thomas, 1520 Drake; Natalie and David Taylor, 1566 Drake; Monica Hagazi, appraiser; Bob Baird 1510 Drake; Mr. Dorage,l5M Drake, commented on the project: how can the proposed project be an improvement to the neighborhood if a majority of the neighbors oppose it; the tees are priceless and with the current development proposal, it is impossible to implement the separation required for the free protection measures outlined in the arborist report; applicant has gone through design rwiew but still madc n,fo f"* changes to the mass and bulk of the proposed houses; the Mitigated Negative Declaration does not adequately address the issues ofthe sewer, the trees , and the traffic problem in the neighborhood; the two houses proposed and the third schematic design show that the houses are in excess of the average existing floor area in the neighborhood by 500-1000 SF; a shared driveway design was never explored bythe applicant, when it would prevent three curb cuts which would eliminate several on-steet parking spaces in the already congested neighborhood; sewer firnction is a major problem that the City and the Planning Commission have ignored repeatedly; sewer now backs up onto street and then flows into the creek; any additional pltrmbing connected to the main will only aggravate the existing problem; the backflow devices proposed will not prevent the main from backing up or prevent sewage from spilling into the creek; the proposed application is a subdivision and it will degrade the quality of life on this block; believe the proposed development will enhance the property values in the neighborhood and that some ofthe neighbor's concerns may be expressed out of fear of change; neighbors are not scared ofchange, just want to make sure it is the right kind ofchange; thought that the design review process was supposed to help improve neighborhoods, do not see that process working in this application; would be willing to explore having the neighbors pay for an independent study of the trees and sewer to veriff the information stated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration; the sewer issues should be fixed before any additional development is allowed in the neighborhood. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 Commission asked staff if condition #31 ensures that the neighbors have the option to have the developer install the backflow devices at his expense. CA Anderson responded that yes, it is important that neighbors understand they can choose whether or not to have the device installed and also determine the type of device to be installed. Commission discussion: resent implication that the Commissioners have not read letters submitted by the neighbors; the Commissioners have devoted a lot of time and deliberation to this very important project; noted that based on professional experience, the Redwood trees on site are young and vigorous, can bear some construction and the monitoring program proposed will ensure their health; there are three existing legal lots on this site and the owner has a right to build three houses; the two houses designed for Lots 9 and l0 meet all the code regulations, they are within floor area ratio maximums and do not require anyvariances, if a house meeting the regulations still appears too large, then the regulations themselves should be changed; this owner has the right to build, within the specified requirements, on the subject property, just as any owner in Burlingame enjoys the same right. Commission continued: in Burlingame Municipal Code sections 26.24.030 and,25.285.090 there is clear distinction between subdivisions and development done to a single lot by a properfy owner, this distinction places more skingent standards on subdivisions; individually, each of the houses is elegantly designed, however with three new houses, all built within a short period of time, the Commission is evaluating a subdivision and it must conform to the higher standards that have been imposed by the citizens of the community through the subdivision code design standards; the proposed houses do not match the character of the neighborhood, they are larger than the neighborhood average in both floor area and number of bedrooms; troubled by the apparent inconsistencies between the neighbor testimony about the sewer and the information presented in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, not convinced that the sewer issue is adequately addressed by the proposed mitigation measures; and in the event of an approval of the project, would strongly support a condition requiring a bond to be posted by the owner for the protection ofthe trees. Further Commission discussion: a memo from the Public Works Department notes that there was an apparent maintenance problem with the sewer, it is now on the City list for frequent maintenance, and feel satisfied that this will help solve the existing sewer issues. C. Brownrigg moved to deny the application. The motion was seconded by C. Keele. Acting Chair Osterling called for a roll call vote, and the motion failed ona2-2-3 roll call vote (Cers. Osterling and Auran dissenting and Cers. Bojues, Keighran and Vistica absent). C. Auran moved to approve, by resolution, with the conditions listed in the staff report and an additional condition to require a bond from the owner for the tree protection measures, the amount to be determined by the City Arborist. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Discussion on the motion: how do fellow Commissioners resolve the discrepancy between the proposed floor areas and the average FAR in the neighborhood; have experienced development around my own property that was built to the maximum, but the design ensured that the development blended into the existing neighborhood; development is progress and allowing property owners to build within the stated regulations keeps Burlingame a viable and desirable community; feel that even if these houses were on separate individual lots for development, would still have major issue with the fact that their mass and bulk doesn't fit in with the averages for the neighborhood; if the developer were to propose a single-story, 1800 SF house on the third lot at this time, the purchaser of the property could come to the Planning Department 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 at any time and request to add beyond the neighborhood averages; feel that the sewer is an issue to be resolved by the City, not by the property owner who wants to develop the lots. Acting Chair Osterling called for a roll call vote, and the motion to approve, by resolution, with amended conditions failed on a2-2-3 vote (Cers. Brownrigg and Keele dissenting and Cers. Bojues, Keighran and Vistica absent). A tie vote is no action and the application is denied. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:43 p.m. Acting Chair Osterling called for a 5-minute break. The Commission reconvened at9:49 p.m. 6.716 CONCORD WAY- ZONED R-l _ APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHARLES AND SUZANNE SAUL, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; GEORGE SKJNNER; ARCHITECT) (57 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE 7 This item was continued to the December 9,2002,meeting. 535 ALMER ROAD - ZONED R.3 _ APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A NEW THREE- STORY, FOUR-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (MANOOCHEHR JAVAHERIAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; GLUSH DESIGN ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (IO3 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RIIRFN I{IIRIN a. Condominium Permit b. Tentative Condominium Map Reference staff report ll.25.02,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staffcomments. Forty-six conditions were suggested for consideration. The Commission asked staft can the required tree protection report by a qualified arborist address the maintenance ofthe oak tree and initial pruning; does condition #1 I ensure that the Black Acacia hee will be removed, it appears that the neighbors would like it removed and the City Arborist has indicated that he thinks this species oftree holds little value. , CA Anderson noted that a tree removal permit was previously issued for the Black Acacia hee the'"conditions could be modified to require initial pruning of the oak hee and to suggest future maintenance measures for this tree as well as to require the removal ofthe Black Acacia, ifthis is agreed to bythe owner. Acting Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Glush Dada, designer, was present to answer questions. She noted that based on the Commission's last comments, the project was redesigned to eliminate the setback variance, this revision required that one of the extra parking spaces be removed and the remaining area was used to provide storage areas for the units. The owner intends to remove the Black Acacia tree. There were no further comments from the floorand the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: in order to eliminate a minor variance, the applicant has removed one parking space and made another space more difficult to access, seems like this is an unfortunate trade-offfor an area in the community that is so impacted by parking; feel that trade-off is necessary, no required spaces were eliminated and in any case, there did not appear to be justification for a variance on the lot; it has been noted that on-site parking for newer condominiums has been more than adequate, so this should work as well. C. Keele moved to approve the application for a condominium permit, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 15,2002, sheets A.1, A.5 through A.7 and C-l (Boundary and Topographic Survey), date stamped November 1,2002, sheet L-I, and date stampedNovember l8,2002,sheets A2, A2a, A.3, A.4,andA8; with I ,5 95 SF of common open space and a 1 6'- I " front setback; and that the landscaping, including fees, shrubs, ground cover and vines shall be planted as shown on the revised Landscape Plans (sheet L-1), date stamped November 1,2002; 2) that a wooden fence, with a maximum height of 7'-0" above highest adjacent grade (6' solid with I' of lattice), shall be installed along the south property line (rear property line between 535 and 525 Almer Road); 3) that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 4) that the conditions of the City Engineer's November 6 and October 23,2002 memos, the Chief Building Official's September 9,2002 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 9,2002 memo, the City Arborist's October 2,2002 memo, and the Recycling Specialist's September 9,20A2 memo shall be met; 5) that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 67 .66'as measured from the average elevation at the top ofthe curb along Almer Road (32.66') for a maximum height of 35'-0", and that the rotunda at the front of the building which rooftop access shall have a maximum elevation of 72.33', or 39'-8" from average top of curb, and that the rotunda shall not exceed 5% of the rooftop area; 6) that the finished grading of the garage floor, the finished slab of the garuge floor, the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the construction and framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The garage finish grade shall be 25.25',the garage floor finished floor shall be elevation26.4l'; first floor finished floor shall be elevation35.24'; second floor finished floor shall be elevation 45.Z4';third floor finished floor shall be elevation 55.24; and the top of ridge elevation shall be 67 .66'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that incursion into the side setback for the basement vent grate and the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 7) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property comers, set the building envelope; 8) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certiff the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 9) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; l0) that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be pfohibited; I I ) that the applicant shall remove the 32-inch Black Acacia tree at the rear of the lot and that a Tree Removal Permit will be required from the City before its removal; 12) that the amount of impervious surfaced area within the dripline ofthe existing oak tree in the adjacent common and private open space shall be determined by an arborist's report and approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspector prior to issuance of a building permit and the root zone of the tree shall be protected during construction based on an arborist's report as approvedbythe City's SeniorLandscapelnspector; andthepavingofimpervious surface in the rear corlmon and adjacent private open space shall be not expanded without an amendment to this condominium permit; and that the arborist's report shall also address initial pruning and enhancement ofthe oak tree and that the owner shall complywith the recommended measures; and that the arborist's report shall recommend future maintenance measures for the oak tree; 13) that this proposal shall complywith all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City ofBurlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street hees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 14) that an irrigation plan consistent with the City's water conservation guidelines shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit; 15) that the underground parking garage shall be designed to city standards and shall be managed and maintained by the condominium association to provide parking at no additional fee, solely for the condominium owners, and that no portion 7 November 25, 2002 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes Novernber 25, 2002 of any parking area and./or egress aisles shall be converted to any other use or any support activity such as storage or utilities, there shall be no storage of automobiles, boats or recreational vehicles within assigned or guest parking stalls; and that the none of the parking spaces shall be rented, leased or sold; 16) that the guest parking shall not be assigned to any unit and shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners association for the use of all visitors to the site; and that 'guest parking stall' shall be marked on the guest parking space and shall be located in a code compliant parking stall; 17) that parking assignments to each dwelling unit shall be left to the developer and tenant association; 18) that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the guest parking stall shall be reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; 19) that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 20) that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture-; 2l) that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment oulside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and CaliforniaBuilding and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 22) thatthe security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 23) that the design of the new building shall incorporate the seismic standards of the Califomia Building Code, 1998 Edition; 24) that the project shall be required to comply with all the standards of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as ilmended by the City of Burlingame for structural stability; 25) that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shallberequired to meetNationalPollutionDischargeElimination System (NPDES) standards; 26) thatthe applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs (Best Management Practices) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations ofcut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downsheam of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 27) that off-site runoff shall be diverted around the constructior site and all on-site runoff shall be diverted around exposed construction areas; 28) that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt fences, shaw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion confiols and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established; 29) thatconstuction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off- site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 30) that ifconstruction is done during the wet season (October I 5 through April I 5), that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion andpollutedrunoffbyinspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; coverinfarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 31) that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-ofi promote surface filtration and minimizethe use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides; 32) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 33) that drainage from paved surfaces, including parking lots, driveways and roofs, shall be routed through buffer strips where possible and shall be filtered through fossil filters or other 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unopproved Minutes Novernber 25, 2002 petroleum absorbent system inserted into stormwater inlets prior to discharge into the storm drain system; the property owners shall be responsible for inspecting and maintaining all filters on at least abiannual basis as well as immediately prior to and once during the rainy season (October I 5 - April 1) or as required by the City upon inspection; 34) that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 35) that demolition ofthe existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to complywith all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 36) that the applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station prior to the final inspection for building permit; 37) that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal Code; 38) that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA; 39) that all new utility connections to serve the site, and which are affected by the development, shall be installed to meet current code standards and local capacities of the collection and distribution systems shall be increased at the developer's expense if necessary; 40) that all utilities to this site shall be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site shall be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site; 4l) that sewer laterals fromjhe site to the public sewer main shall be chcckpd and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the development; 42) that abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed; 43) that all drainage (including water from the below grade parking garage) on site shall be required to be collected and pumped to Almer Road; 44) thatproject approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dualpumps, controls,level sensors, etc.). Emergencygenerators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise requirement; 45) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1645, the City of Burlingame Recycling and Waste Reduction Ordinance, and shall submit a waste reduction plan and recycling deposit for demolition and new construction, before receiving a demolition permit; and 46) that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Acting Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the condominium permit. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). C. Keele moved to recommend approval ofthe tentative condominium map to the City Council. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Acting Chair Osterling called for a voice vcrte on the motion to recommend approval of the tentative condominilrm map. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:10 p.m. 8.808 EDGEHILL DRIVE _ ZONED C-R - APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCES FOR A NEW, THREE- STORY, DUPLEX ON EDGEHILL DRWE AND AN ATTACIIED SINGLE-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON CALIFORNIA DRIVE (MIKE JALILM, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; CTW ARCHITECTURE, ARCHTTF,CN fJO N PROJECT PLANNER: RTIBEN I{T]RIN This item was continued to the December 9,2002, meeting. 1301 BURLINGAME AVENUE-ZONED C.1, SUBAREAA-APPLICATIONFORAMITIGATEDNEGATIVE DECLARATION AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW SINGLE-STORY, RETAIL BUILDING EOBERT BRADSBY, 8 INC,, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AVTAR JOHAL, PROPERTY OWNER) (36 9. NOTICED) PRO^IECT PI,A ERIKA LEWIT 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 Reference staffreport 11.25.02,with attachments. Planner Lewit presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Nineteen conditions were suggested for consideration. The Commission asked ifthe City's construction hours permitted consfruction on the weekends. CA Anderson noted that weekend construction is allowed by the City, but that the Commission could modiff the City's standard construction hours. Acting Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Tim Kobe, Eight Inc., was present to answer questions. The Commission asked: will there be additional signage along Park Road in the blank space beyond the displaywindow; is the color of the brick the same yellow that is shown on the photo boards; will this color compliment the city's designated color for the sidewalk improvements, will there be automated displays in the display window; why was the brick color changed from black to tan and were any other colors considered; would the applicant be willing to forego construction on the weekends, which is the biggest shopping time for Burlitrgame Avenue. The applicant responded that the proposed signage was meant to be minimalist; the color of the proposed tan brick is very similarto the bricks seen in Council Charrrbers and the color will compliment the color dictated by the City for the sidewal( Apple has a design team that creates displays for the window on Park Road, the designs may be automated and will be changed frequently to coincide with advertising campaigns; there did not seem to be overwhelming support among the Commissioners for the black brick so the color was changed to tan, red-tinted bricks were also considered; and applicant would agree to construction hours imposed by the Commission. There were no further comments and the public hearingwas closed. Commission discussion: concern about restricting the construction hours, think it would be better for the merchants on Burlingame Avenue if the construction was completed as quickly as possible. CP Monroe noted that condition # 13 should be modified to clarify the City's standard construction hours and to prohibit heavy equipment operation or hauling on weekends. C. Brownrigg moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 15,2002, sheets A0.01 through A3.1 and Cl.0 through C6.0, with tan-colored briclq a brick soldier course below the parapet and above the windows on each elevation, and a recessed storefront windows and frameless glass doors along Burlingame Avenue, and a 45'long, 3-foot tall displaywindow along Park Road.; and that any chgnges to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; 2) that the project shall obtain Planning Commission commercial designreview approval before demolition of the existing structure (except for asbestos removal or reconshuction) or constuction of the new building takes place on the site; 3) thatdemolitionoftheexistingstnrchuesandany grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit from the Building Deparhnent; and that the applicant shall comply with all requirements of the permit; 4) that any changes to the size or envelope or approved of building, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roofheight or pitch, shall be subject to commercial design review; 5) that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's, Building Official's and Recycling Specialist's Jnly 29,2002, memos and the conditions ofthe CityEngineer's August6,2OO2, September 10,2002 and October 28,2002 memos shall be met; 6) that the demolition and construction on the site shall follow the conskuction logistics plan date stamped Jwrc29,2001, and the memo and diagrams regarding construction staging and date stamped September 4,2002, and demolition and site conskuction plans date stamped October 22, 2002; 7) that the debris box in the alley shall be limited to a 10' x 24' debris box, and shall only be in place for a two week period during demolition, and the alley and fire lane shall not be completelyblocked, there shall be adequate space for a vehicle to maneuver around the debris box; and that flagmen shall be available for traffic control while the debris box is in place; 8) that an encroachment permit shall be obtained from 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission (Jnapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 the Public Works Department for the scaffolding in the public right-of-way along Burlingame Avenue and Park Road; 9) that the pedestrian access provided along Burlingame Avenue and Park Road shall not block any on-street parking spaces; l0) that employee vehicles shall not be parked in Lot J; I 1) that truck access to the site shall not use Burlingame Avenue or California Drive, trucks shall access the site from Howard and the City Hall Lane alley, access from US 101 to the site shall be via Carolan Avenue; 12) that no construction that would impact the public right-of-way (such as scaffolding, pedestrian barricades, truck loading and unloading and parking reductions) shall occur between November 3'd through January 5th; construction solely within the building may occur during this time as long as the public alley and right of way are not impacted or blocked; 13) that all construction shall be done in accordance with the Califomia Building Code requirements as amended by the City of Burlingame, and to the limits on hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code; these hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no construction on holidays and no heavy equipment operation or hauling shall be permitted on weekends or holidays; 14) that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior noise level within the building does not exceed 45 dBA; 15) that the contractor shall submit the "Recycling and W.aste Psduction" form to the building department to be approved bythe Chief Building Official that demonstrates how 60percentofconstruction demolitionmaterialwill be diverted from the waste stream and the applicant shall be required to implement this plan; 16) that the contractor shall prepare, have approved and shall implement a plan that insures that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards; 17) that should any cultural resources be discovered during construction, all work shall be halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the City Planner and the recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction ofthe City; 18) that all signage on the site shall require a separate application for a sign permit; and 19) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Califomia Building Code and California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Keele. Comment on the motion: Commission appreciates the hard work and cooperation of the applicant. Acting Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cers' Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:35 p.m. 10.1755 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY _ ZONED O-M - APPLICATION FOR A SIGN VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT OF THREE NEW WALL SIGNS (ALAN FORDA4ARCO ACOSTA, SIGN RESOURCE, APPLICANTS/DESIGNER; SATURN I}N/ESTMENT GROUP, PROPERTY OWNER) (I7 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE RARRER This item was continued to the December 9,Z002,meeting. DESIGN REYIEW STUDY ITEMS 1384 HILLSIDE CIRCLE _ ZONED R-I - APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JIM AND NANCY LOCKE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; ELLIS A. SCHOICHET, Planner Lewit brieflypresented the project description. There were no questions of staff. IX. 11. 1l City of Burlfugame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 Acting Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Ellis Schoichet, architect, was present to answer questions about the project. He noted that the proposed design allowed the applicants to expand the existing house, as well as to correct some existing problems with roof drainage. He also stated that there had been a miscommunication with the Building Department in determining if an egress window was required for the proposed lower floor, the window is not shown on the original plans, but he submitted into the record revised 8 %x I I size drawings for the Commission to review the proposed window. The Commission asked the applicant why a special pennit for height was needed The architect responded that the existing house had several additions done at separate times and the roof over the additions drained into itself, resulting in water damage, the proposed roof is the easiest way to resolve the existing problems and still maintain the existing roof pitch, the added height will not be visible from the street and does not impact anyneighbors. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar on the next available agenda. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Acting Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:44 p.m. 12.2990 ARGUELLO DRIYE _ ZONED R.l _APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (ALAN D. OLIN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DAVE AND LORI TAPIA, PROPERTY OWNERS) (37 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERIM BARBER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Alan Olin, architect was present to answer questions. He noted that there is an error in the table in the staffreport: the existing right side setback is 1 1'-10", the same dimension as the proposed right side setback. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: regular action calendar may be appropriate because of the variance request, the variance is consistent with?re existing setback of the house and the addition is modest, well within the required FAR, feel project can go to consent calendar and be pulled off if there are concerns, although Commission has made it a practice to require story poles for construction in the hillside area, in this case the topography of the neighborhood is relatively flat, the project has been noticed once and no neighbors have spoken against it, so do not feel that story poles are necessary. C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the next available consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Acting Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent cale,ndar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:51 p.m. 15 RAY COURT - ZONED R.I - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JERRY DEAL, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; ROB AND LEANNE UHICH. PROPERTY OWNER) (6I NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT Planner Lewit briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. 13. 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 25, 2002 Acting Chair Osterling opened the public cornment. Robert Uhrich, owner, and Jerry Deal, designer, were present to answer questions. The owner noted that the family plans to live in the house for many years and they have worked closely with the designer to have the proposed changes fit into the neighborhood. The Commission asked: what are the "shading devices" shown on Sheet l, has the owner considered changing the garage doors, since they are so visible from the street. The applicants responded that the "shading devices" are required by the Building Department for Title 24 requirements and are not trees, but things like curtains or shades. It was noted that the garage door was recently replaced. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the next available consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Keele. Acting Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3 (Cers. Boju6s, Keighran, and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:58 p.m. X. PLAI\NER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of November 18,2002 - Approval of 2003 Planning Commission Meeting Calendar CP Monroe reviewed the proposed meeting calendar for 2003 and noted the Commission could defer approval of the calendar until a time when all Commissioners had the opportunity to review their schedules. - FYI on approved design review for 1204 Cabrillo Avenue CP Monroe noted the memo on changes to the front door and the roof material. The Commission had no comments. - FYI on approved design review for 2000 Davis Drive CP Monroe noted the memo on changes to windows, the rear balcony, and the roof configuration. The Commission had no comments. XI.; ADJOURNMENT Acting Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 11:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Tim Auran, Acting Secretary rJNAPPRoYEDNarNures I I .25 .02 13 CITY OF BT'RIJINGAME S,AIIE MOIrIE I|AST YEAR F.Y . 20021IIIS YEAR TC' DATB F.Y.2001 IAST XBAR XlO DATB MONTHIJY PERMIT ACTIVITY ocToBER, 2002 * va]'uatioB * va].rlatimPermlt tl7I,e New Single Family New Multi-FamlLy New Comlercia]- Alt,erations -Res Alterations -NonRes DemoliLion Swiruning PooI Sigrr Permit.a Fences Reroofing Repaira Window RepI Miacellaneoua txIS 1,tr18 * va]"uati@ $300, DIFF * va}latLm t 1 0 0 33 9 0 3 0 36 11 9 100 LO2 201 100 100 155 43 110 86 195 $1, s94, sa,747 , $17, 9478, $15, s77, 919s, 000 9o $o 62s 500 $o $o 472 $o 743 000 470 554 $3so, ooo $o $6, s00, 000 $788,200 9s67, s00 $9,ooo $22, ooo $6,800 $o $333, s86 $7,500 $4L , 529 $55, X00 6 0 0 108 2A 34 0 13 L21 9 25 33 92,383,000 9o so ss ,32]. ,736 94,418, s90 $L ,725 $o 9112, 4s1 $1,s00 61,s03,300 978,000 sL65 ,74L s392,967 5 $1,540,000 0 $0 4 $10, 1OO, 000 99 14, OO7 ,229 23 s3, s04,4s0 25 s39,000 1 $22,000 7 $34,575 1 $1,000 98 $L,274,343 7 $1s,900 22 $X82,40s 29 $494 ,129 1 0 I 16 5 8 1 3 0 28 4 6 74 .3- .0 . o- .3 .9 .0- .0- .9 .0 .5 .5 .1 .8 DIFF * 45.3 .0 100.0- 32.4 26 .1 95,6- 100.0- 225.2 50.0 18,0 390.5 8.6- 20 .5- TOTALS......L11 $4,427,354 79 15,592,4!5 49.L-3S2 $14,380,010 321 $21,3r.s,031 32.5- LL/L4/02 L2. s0 |2L lnvestments Par CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 3'1,2002 Market Value Book Value Yo ot Portfolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equiv,Value LAIF & County Pool Federal Agency lssues - Coupon lnvestments 20,904,820.58 9,000,000.00 20,904,820.s8 9,060,600.00 20,904,820.58 9,000,000.00 69.90 30.10 1,096 3.1 55 3.830 3.1 99 3.883 1 797 29,904,820.s8 29,965,420.58 29,904,820.58 100.00%331 240 3.358 3.405 Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Cunent Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Pursuant law, RAHN A, BECKER, FINANCE DIR.iTREASURER 86,193.25 431 ,710.51 29,286,923.51 29,174,820.30 3.47% 4.39o/o available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds)./l-/Z-oz Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 Run Date: I 1 l'1212002 . 1 I i03 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Details . lnvestments October 31,2002 Page2 CUSIP lnvestment #lssuer Average Balanc6 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value YTM Days to 305 Maturity Maturity Date Stated Book Value Rate Moodv's LAIF & Gounty Pool sYS77 77 sYs79 79 LOCAL AGENCY INV,FD. S M COUNTY POOL Subtotal and Average 7,402,786.21 13,502,034.37 7,402,786.21 13,502,034.37 7,402,786.21 13,502,034.37 2.430 3.620 2.430 3.620 20,288,923.51 20,904,E20,58 20,904,820.58 20,904,820.58 3.1 99 Federal Agency lssues . Goupon 3133MSTS4 476 3133MLMH5 sos 3133MQDJ0 507 312925PN4 506 3129253X6 510 3136F2AR9 508 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG,CORP FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP FANNIE MAE Subtotal and Average 9,000,000.00 6.020 4.000 3.550 4.125 3.200 3.250 6.020 4.002 4,125 3.200 3.250 03/1 7/1 998 02t26t2002 08112t2002 06106t2002 09t19t2002 0811412002 1,000,000.00 2,000,000,00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1 ,016,870.00 2,013,740.00 2,000,620.00 1 ,013,750.00 1,007,500.00 2,006,120,00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 136 756 1 ,015 /oo 1,053 836 03t1712003 11t26t2004 08t1212005 12106t2004 09/'19/2005 9?r'1412005 9,000,000,00 9,060,600.00 9,000,000.00 3.883 797 Total and Average 29,286,923.51 29,904,820,58 29,965,420.58 29,904,820.58 3.405 240 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21 Run Oate: '11h212002 - 11:03 Report Ver.5.00 1 1 GITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Activity By Type October 1,2002 through October 31,2002 Page 3 CUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Beginning Balance Stated Rate Transactlon Date Purchases or Deposlts Redemptions or Wlthdrawals Endlng Balance LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCALAGENCY INV.FD SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL Subtotal 2.430 3.620 59,834.2E 725,447.87 1,700,000.00 0.00 21,819,538.43 785,282.15 1,700,000,00 20,904,820.58 Federal Agency lssues - Coupon Subtotal 8,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 Total 30,819,538.43 78s,282.15 1,700,000.00 29,904,820.58 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 Run Dale: 1111212002 - 11:03 Month CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Activity Summary October 2001 through October 2002 Yield to Maturity Managed 360 365 Number of lnvestments Purchased Number of lnvestmonts Redeemed Page 4 Avorage Days to MaturityEndYear Number of Securitles Total lnvested Equivalent Equivalent Pool Rate Average Term October November December January February March April May June July August September October 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 12 12 12 11 11 10 't0 o 7 6 7 I I 32,614,594.78 33,056,179.95 35,671,743.12 34,732,791.56 32,802,148.54 30,605,734.76 35,999,602.11 32,433,148.91 28,726,372,62 26,790,987.15 29,805,599.73 30,819,538.43 29,904,820.58 4.880 4.812 4.629 4,497 4.441 4.419 4.147 4,1 69 3.886 3.677 3.368 3.394 3.358 4.948 4.879 4.694 4.559 4.503 4.480 4,204 4.227 3.940 3.728 3.415 3.441 3.405 3.809 3.683 3.474 3.232 3.237 3.317 3.1 34 3.237 3.258 3.195 3.212 3.259 3.199 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 I 0 3 0 0 1 1 I 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 791 763 69'1 ooz 658 580 480 428 356 327 222 242 240 ,028 ,014 940 928 933 880 749 718 547 451 295 321 331 Average 9 31,843,327.86 4.129%4.186%3.327 1 703 495 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 Run Oate: 1111212002 - 11:03 0 t CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Distribution of Investments By Type October 2001 through October 2002 January February 2002 2002 2002 2002 August September 2002 2002 Page 5 Average by Perlod October November December 2001 2001 2001 March 2002 JulyMayAprilJune 2002 2002 October 2002Security Type LAIF & County Pool Certificates of 41.7 42.4 46.7 4E.1 45,0 47.6 55.5 56.8 65.2 70.1 73.2 70.8 69.9 56,4% - Bank Certificates of Deposit - S & L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift & Ln Negotiable CD's - Bank Commercial Paper . lnterest Bearing 9.3 9.2 8.5 8.7 9.2 8.4 9.3 7.0 6.10/o Gommerclal Paper - Discount Federal Agency lssues . Coupon 49.1 48.4 44.9 43.2 45,7 42.5 36.1 33.9 27.9 29.9 26.8 29.2 30.1 37.50/a Federal lssues - Discount Treasury Securities - Coupon Treasury Securities . Discount M iscellaneous Securities .Coupon Mlscellaneous Securities . Dlscount Non lnterest Bearing lnvestments Mortgage Backed Securities Miscellaneous Discounts Cost 2 Mlscellaneous Discounts .At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PMs) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 Run Date: 1111212002 - 11:03 CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management !nterest Earnings Summary October 31,2002 October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Page 6 CD/Coupon/Discou nt I nvestments : lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Purchase During Period lnterest Earned during Period Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Earnings during Periods ( 0.00 71,633.47 42,512.64) 0.00) 227,358.33 71,633.47 1 62,765.1 3) 0.00) 29,120.83 0.00 136,226.67 77,500.00 29,120.83 213,726.67 Pass Through Securities: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period lnterest Earned during Period Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00) 0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 Gash/Ghecking Accounts: lnterest Collected Plus Accrued lnterest at End of Period Less Accrued lnterest at Beginning of Period lnterest Earned during Period 160,911.42 285,200.09 389,0s9.09) 304,893.39 285,200.09 372,109.64) 57,072.42 217,983.84 Total lnterest Earned during Period Total Gapital Gains or Losses 86,193.25 0.00 354,210.51 77,500.00 Run Date: 1',|11212002 . 11:03 Total Earnings during Period 86,193.25 431,710.51 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM6) SymRept V6.21 Reporl Ver. 5.00 (( ( ( ( ( ( (( lnvestments Par 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31,2002 Market Value Book Value Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv.365 Equiv. YTM Value Federal Agency lssues - Coupon 800,000.00 825,000.00 802,000.00 100.00 1,756 318 4.995 5.064 lnvestments 800,000.00 825,000.00 802,000.00 't 00.00% 1,756 318 4.995 5.064 Total Earnlngs October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 3,416.67 802,000.00 5.02o/o 13,666.67 802,000.00 5.06% Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and funds is law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).ll-l)-ou Rahn , Finance Director/Treasurer Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRepl V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 Run Date: 1111212002 - 11:08 o/o ol Portfolio CUSIP lnvestment #lssuer Average Balance 95BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments October 31,2002 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated Book Value Rate Page 2 YTM Days to Maturity 365 Maturlty Oate LAIF SYS79 79 5.707LOCAL AGENCY INV, FD. Subtotal and Averago 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.707 Federal Agency lssues . Coupon 31 33M50B9 485 11124t1998 800,000.00 825,000.00FEDERAL HOI\,IE LOAN BANK Subtotal and Average 802,000.00 800,000.00 825,000.00 802,000.00 802,000.00 5.125 5.064 318 09/15/2003 5.054 318 Total and Average E02,000.00 800,000.00 825,000.00 802,000.00 5,064 318 Portfolio 95BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.2'lRun Date: 1'l h?D002. I 1 :08 Reporl Ver. 5.00 lnvestments Par 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31,2002 Market Value Book Value o/o ot Portfolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equlv.Value Federal Agency Coupon Securities lnvestments 1 ,710,000.00 1,740,985.20 1 ,710,000.00 100.00 1,826 145 ( o77 6.060 1 ,710,000.00 1,740,985.20 1,710,000.00 100.00% 1,826 145 5.977 6.060 Total Earnlngs October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Pursuant to State law, there are of RAHN BECKER, Finance 8,874.05 34,803.89 1 ,710,000.00 1 ,710,000.00 6.1'.1c/o 6,04% available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and'restricted by law (e.9. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds)./F/z-(r Portfolio 98BD CP PM (PRF_PMl ) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 Run Date: 11I1U2002 - 11i08 CUSIP lnvestment f lssuer Average Balance 98BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - lnvestments October 31,2002 Purchase Oate Par Value Stated Book Value Rate Moody'sMarket Value YTM Days to 365 Maturity Page 2 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYSsO 80 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.124 5.124 1LOCAL AGENCY INVEST FUND Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133M3XE0 478 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK Subtotal and Average 03/26/1 998 1 ,710,000.00 1,740,985,20 1 ,710,000.00 6.060 6.060 145 0312612003 6.060 1451,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,7.O,985.20 't,710,000.00 Total and Average 1,71 0,000.00 1,710,000.00 1,740,585.20 1,710,000.00 6.060 145 Portfolio 98BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRepl V6.2'lRun Date: 1111212002 - 11:08 Report Ver. 5.00 lnvestments Par Ol BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31,2002 Market Value Book Value oh of Portfollo Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equiv. YTM 365 Equlv.Value Managed Pool Accounts Federal Agency Coupon Securities 2,683,278.82 1 ,100,000.00 2,683,278.82 1,103,764.00 2,683,278.82 1,100,000.00 70.s2 2S.08 1 1,096 1 1,029 2.397 3.205 2.430 3.250 lnvestments 3,783,278,82 3,787,062.82 3,783,278.82 100.00%319 300 2.632 2.668 Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Pursuant to law, there are (e & 8,794.03 46,306.79 3,788,986.70 4,680,355.56 2.73% 2.94% available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is and Enterprise funds). -12-rz2- Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM1 ) SymRept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 funds, Capital ,t.";j, Rahn A. Becker,Dir.ffreasurer Run Oate: 1'111212002 - 1I:09 01 BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Details . lnvestments October 31,2002 Purchase Date Page 2 Average Balance Market Value Stated Book Value Rate YTM Days to Maturity 365 Maturity Date YTM CUSIP lnvestment #lssuer Par Value 360 Managed Pool Accounts sYS81 81 2,683,278.82 2,4$,278.82 2,683,278.82 2.430 2.397 2.430 1Local Agency lnv. Fd Subtotal and Average 2,688,086.70 2,483,278.82 2,683,278.82 2,683,27E.E2 2.397 2.430 1 Federal Agency Goupon Securities 31359MPB3 509 0812612002 1,100,000.00 1,103,784.00FANNIE MAE Subtotal and Average 1,100,000.00 1,'t 00,000.00 1,103,784.00 1,'t00,000.00 3.250 3.205 3.250 1,029 08t26t2005 't,100,000.00 3.205 3.250 1,029 Total and Average 3,788,986.70 3,783,278.82 3,787,062.82 3,783,278.82 2.632 2,668 300 Portfolio 01BD CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21Run Oats: 11h212002 "'11:09 Report Ver. 5.00 Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter Manslaughter by Negligence Rape By Force AttempE to CommiE Forcible Rape Robbery Firearm Robbery Knife Robbery Other Dangerous Weapon Robbery Strong-Arm Assault - Fi-rearm Assault - Knife Assaul-t - ot.her Dangerous Weapon Assault - Hands. Fists, Feet Assault - other (S j-mple) Burglary - Forc j.b1e EnEry Burglary - unl-awful Entry Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry l-.,arceny Pocket - Picking Larceny Purse - Snatching L.,arceny Shopl- j.f Eing Larceny From Motor Vehicle I-,arceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories Larceny Bicycles Larceny From Building Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine Larceny Af1 Other Motor Vehicle Theft Auto Motsor Vehicl-e Theft Bus MoEor Vehicfe Theft Other SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES FOR: OCTOBER, 2002 LdE; L Current Year.. PAGE: 1 Act YTD Prev ACt YTD. 0 0 10 1 7 2 3 L2 2 3 L6 5 1 1 1 I I I I )) 5 5 13 9 L75 113 3 45 11 L0 10 2 L5 11 32 LL4 34 2a 308 11 51 104 2 2 6L 7 4 5 3 34 10 11 2 18 10 L I 155 135 1,008 1,105 L7-22 - 02 Crime Classif icati-on. 1 ) 0 6 0 10 2 2 8 1 10 13 5 159 55 68 l- 0 0 198 80 35 23 1 93 79 4 155 13s 1,008 1,10s LL -22 - 02 A11 OEher offenses Animal Abuse Animal Nuisance ArsonAssists to outside Agencies Bicycle Violatsions Bigamy Bomb Offense Bomb Threat Bribery Check Offenses Child NeglecE/prot cusEody Computer Crime Conspi racy Credit Card Offenses Cruelty to Dependent Adult Curfew and Loitering l-Jaws Death InvesEigation Disorderly ConducE Driver' s l-.,icense Violations Driving Under Ehe Influence Drug Abuse Violations Drug/Sex Registrants Drunkeness Ernlf,e z zl-ement E scape Extort i on Fafse Police Reports False ReporLs of Emergency Fish and Game violations Forgery and Counterfeiting Found Property Fraud Garnbl ing Harrassing Phone Cal-Ls Hit and Run Accidentss ImpersonaE i on Inces E Indecent Exposure IntimidaEing a Witness Kidnapp ing I-,ev/d Conduct I-,iquor Laws I-,ittering/Dumping Marijuana Violations Mental Heal-th Cases Missing Person Missing Property Municipal Code Violations Narcotics Sales/Manuf acture Offenses Against Children MONTH]-,Y SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2002 Crime CIassi fication.Current 35 Las t Year.. Act YTD 36 4 15 3 Prev AcE YTD... 457 2 1 2 0 L2 0 0 0 l_ 3 0 324 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 53 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 8 0 I L7 24 0 0 4 4 1 24 44 7 52,o 50 76 30 0 70 57 3 0 5 0 1 3 9 1 23 90 28 95 51 0 t7 l4 23 0 1 15 3 5 54 Ll 77 30 1 63 19 0 0 0 2 0 20 83 L7 0 57 30 1 3 2 1 9 2 4 l- 3 6 4 13 5 t 2 L6 5 11 1 4 2A 9t 30 156 46 2 3 PAGE: l- 1 3 4 5 2 6 1 3 L2 1 7 3 1 L1-22 -02 MONTHI.,,Y SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2002 PAGE: 2 Crime Classification. I-.,asts CurrenE Year.. Act YTD... Prev Act YTD. Other AssaulLs OtherJuvenile Offenses Other PoLice Service Pandering for immoral purposes ParoLe Violations Perj ury Possess j-on of Burglary Tools Possession of drug paraphernalia Possession of obscene 1i terature ,' pict.ure Probation ViolaEions ProsEiEuLion and Commercial Vice Prowl ing Resisting ArresE Runaways (Under 18) Sex Offenses sex offenses against Children Sodomy StaLk j.ng Statutory Rape Stolen Property; Buying; Rece iving; Pos ses s Suspended License Tax Evasion Temp Restraining Orders Terrorists Threats Towed Vehicle Trespas s ing Truantss/ Incorrigible .Tuvs US Mail Crimes Vagrancy Vandal i sm Vehicl-e Code Violations Violation of Court Order WarranEs - Felony Warrants - Misd Weapons ; Carrying, Possessing Welfare Fraud ))159 8 1 5 4 6L 0 2 0 1 0 0 7 0 l-1 0 I 3 0I 0 4 35 0 9 1 2 2 3 t- 1 1_7 5 1 144 0 1 0 0 0 0)) ) 4 3 0 6 6 0 2 0 4 50 0 3 4 49 2 2 3 2 53 47 33 4't 3 13 0 0 0 2L6 24 6 48 L4 0 51 30 5l_ 5 5 5 0 0 205 44 18 6 55 13 0 15 5 3 5 ) '2. 2 2 6 2 265 25L 2,434 2,795 265 25L 2,434 2,795 LL-22-02 Parklng Citat.ions Moving Citations MONTHLY SUMMARY OF C]TATIONS CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2002 PAGE: 1 Crime Classification Current Last Year.. Act YTD Prev Act YTD. 27,86L 2 ,092 3252 L20 3,381- t- l_3 31,089 2,260 3372 3,494 33,349 29,953 3372 3,494 33,349 29,953 Officer Productivity. . . . Reported On: All Officers Data Type Reported on: PARKING Of,f,lcer:ID: valid cnt BURLINGA}4E generated on Ll/22/2002 at 02:18:53 PM Report Ranget L0/01./2002 to 70/37/2002 -^ t A11 valid Volds cht t all Volds valid t DAZA-QUlROZ GARRETT HARRISON JEOX KIRKPATRICK MORAN ROSCOE 634 501 506 505 502 20L 503 4LL 317 1.2t5 764 468 92 ?q 12.30 9.49 36.36 22.86 14.00 a at 2.24 10. 61 13.64 33.33 19.70 16.61 4.55 1.52 98.33 91 .24 98.22 98.33 9't.70 96.44 98. 68 '7 9 22 13 11 3 1 TotaI 3342 66 Dage 1 of 1 YEA Youth and Family Assistance 609 Price Avenue, Suite 205 Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 366-8401 FAX: (650) 366-8455 www.yfa.org Board of Directors Chairperson TyAuer, MBA l4ce Chairperson Kathryn Curry, JD Secretary Tim Forest, MBA Treasurer Jennifer Hillman, CPA Marco Baisch, M.D. Sandeep Bhatt Linda Bronson Celene Chang, MBA Meg Holland, MBA Susie Hwang Annette Jahnke Melissa Garcia Jordan Alyssa Rieder, CFA Eric Stang, MBA Jim Warren Youth Board and Fellows Sal Cerrillo Tiffany Chu TonyDo Dave Dworak Debby Tochez Wangui Kambuga Programs YFAArchway YFA Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Center YFA Daybreak YFA Diversion Services YFA Family Law Services YFA Insights Redwood City Youth Health Ccnter YFAYour House South Youth Development Initiativc October 31,2002 Mr. Rahn Becker City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010-3991 Dear Mr. Becker, I would like to share with you the results of our recent reorganization at YFA. Included in your packet is our new organizational chart complete with a detailed breakdown of each new department. In October we consolidated nine programmatic departments into four. The new departments are Substance Abuse, Counseling, Residential Services and Youth Development. We believe that this reorganization will increase both the efficiency as well as the effectiveness of our service delivery system. I have also enclosed our new vision statement; one that I expect will guide each staff member in his or her work with our clients. Complimenting this statement are the four areas that we intend to focus on for the coming year. YFA has created committees that will be addressing the following issues: creating an integrated service delivery system, attaining financial strength, designing quality service provision and practicing focused leadership. I would be glad to answer any questions that you may have regarding these directions. Finally, I have included a revised budget. The consolidation resulted in substantial fiscal savings. We have provided a detailed breakout for you that delineate our expense and revenue reductions. We anticipate ending the year with a surplus, however the size of that surplus may vary given economic conditions. I would be very willing to arrange an appointment with you if you so desire so that we could go in greater detail regarding any ofour recent changes. These are very exciting new directions that we are embarking upon. I will keep you updated conceming our progress. Thank you for your support and commitment. Sincerely, Bob YFA Director Bob Rybickl Executivo DiEctor Robecca Allison Annafi3 Prslrsqur Dlrrctor ol Youth Devolopmcnt Daw Willi.ms & AdministEtion John Xuadockar Dirrctor ol Dowlopmont t'Ll'3. f oOrn Dilrctor of Substrnco Abus Sorui$s Kethy oshor DiBctor of Counsling Scrules Co-DiBG'to13 ol Rosidonti.l Saillmg Kyrioll lloon GEnt lYdtsr School€.sd Counsollng Prolram fanagor DrybMf Youtlr Commls3lon Dobn Goslin Accountant xaltha Gllone Prol.ct t.nrgrl PEEndonrErdy lnt rwntlon I.ndy Grignon Pmgnm An.lyst Voicas Agalnst violonE THPP Preioct tanrger Fanily Lew Ssrul@sPmgnm taneesr Communlty Basd Countallng PoJcot frn.err Outre.ch RCYHC Coun$ling Your Hou$ Sou0r Crisis Counsellng Progrrm ilanegor Cllnlcrl Suporuisors YFA Board of Directors YFA Organizational Chart Prcposltlon 38 Erdy lntorvandon Publlc Spsrklne Budln!.no Hlgh Sahool FOP'IY&R'DEJ (AdulUJut,onllo FOPI Prepotloon 38 Ou$.tlcnt Phi$ I Rolrpla Pltvgntlon PrEnt Suppolt Gtoup R.GowryrAltcrorrt R.calving Homa to SusponEion Lls Homrnas Kannedy DlwElon Pollco Departmont rnd Clinic Resldsntlel Coun$loE ProJ.ot I.nrgor Counslor Emenclprtod Youth Folbr Ca]! OutFach Wortor WortoB Frmily Counsclor Load Rssldontlrl Counsalor RaBldontlrl CounaoloE Youth AEsst To.m Psr f ontoE Heelth Educ.tion Youth lnt3Nontion T6rm Wam Llno Crisls Llno Aloohol & Drug Lins lnt3mE Tnlnlngs For YFA Stall.nd lntoms Revised 10-10-02 BartaE Walker E Dobbia Dirz Adult Dom$tic ton-Vlolsn@ f iddle Schools YFA Substance Abuse Services Adrn i nistrative Assistant Prograrn llllanager T reatrn enUAfterca re Services Project Manager Prevention/Ea rly Intervention Proposition 36 Outpatient Proposition 35 Early lntervention Public Speaking Phase I Relapse PreventionBurl i ngame High School Parent Support GroupFOP/W&FUDEJ (AdulUJuvenile FOP) Recovery/Aftercare Receiving Home Adult Domestic Non-Violence M'Lissa Morgan Director of Substance Abuse Services Contact lnformation: M'Lissa Morgan 609 Price Avenue, Suite 201 Redwood City, CA 94063 650-366-8433 650-366-8401, Ext.700 YFA Counseling Services School-Based Counseling Program Managel Family Law Seruices Community Based Goumeling Proiect tanager Cfub Counseling Program ilanager Clinical Supervbors Alternatives to Suspension RCYHC Counseling Youth lntervention Team lnterns Peer tentorc Mis Hermanas Trainings For YFA Staff and lnterns Warm Line Health EducationDivercion Middle Schools Crisis Line Kennedy Alcohol & Drug Line School-Based Groups Divercion Police Department and Clinic Kathy O'Shea Director of Gounseling Services Contact lnformation: Kathy O'Shea 609 Price Avenue, Suite 101 Redwood City, CA 94063 650-366-8401, ext. 314 YFA Residential Services Daybreak THPP Outreach Your House South Lead Residential Counselor Project Manager Outreach tilorkers Family Counselor Residential Counselors Counselor Lead Residential Counselor Emancipated Youth OutreachWorker Residential Counselors Barbara Walker & Debbie Diaz Co-Directors of Residential Services Contact lnformation: Barbara Walker 639 Douglas Avenue Redwood City, CA 94063 650-364-4633 650-366-8401, ext. 702 Debbie Diaz 394 Sequoia Avenue Redwood City, CA 94061 6s0-367-9687 650-366-8401, ext.704 a YFA Youth Development & Educational Selvices Youth Commission Voices Against Violence Project Manager Youth Asset Team Contact lnformation: Annette Passalacqua 609 Price Avenue, Suite 108 Redwood City, CA 94063 650-366-8416 650-366-8401, ext. 705 Annette Passalacqua Director of Youth Development YFA Administration Services Contact lnformation: YFA Administrative Office 609 Price Avenue, Suite 205 Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 366€401 Bob Rybicki Executive Directol Ext. 3OB Rsbecca Allison Human Re3ourcea Associate Ext. 3O7 Dave Williams Director of Finance and Administration Ext 3OG John Nuedeckel Director of Development Ext-321 Kyriell Noon Grant l,Urite] Ext. 312 Mandy Grignon Program Analyst Ext, 327 YFA Board of Directors Debra Goslan Accountant Ext. 303 YFA Vision Building skills and enhancing strengths by partneri ng with youth,\ adults, and their families in the community. YFA Focus for 200212003 lntegrated Structure Financial Strength Quality Seruice Provision Focused Leadership Evaluab Prognm Design and lm plemenhtion Follow a ClearVisionCreate Client Dahbase to Track Referrals, Shtistics, Ouhomes Lead to Ensure Inhgration of Vision with Programs Strucfure lnter- Program Referrals Divercify Funding in order to be more SelfSufficient Design Comprehensive Seruice Delivery System Create Cohesive Management Team Consolidate ffices Draft Long-Range Fundraising Plan Enhance Professional Developmentof Shff Create $100,000 Cash Reseryes YFA EXPENSE BUDGET W NET INCOME PROJECTION JULY 2OO2JUNE 2OO3 IUIAL AGENCY (oLD)AOJMNT I UIAL AGENCY REVISED 7200 'Salarles & rolated €xpenses 7220'Salarles &wages 7320{l . Health lnsurance 7320{2 ' Lifo lnsuEnco 7320-03 ' Bonoflt waiver 741041 ' FICA (Soclal Securlty M€dlere) 7410{2' Unemploymnt lnsurance 741043 'Work€6 Comp tnsumnce 6561 . Payroll Expensas Total 7200 ' Salarles & related oxpenses 7500 'Fees for Professlocl Ssrylces 7510 . Fundmlsingy'PR prot fees 7525. Audlt Fees 7530. Legal fees 754044' Cllnlcal Tralning 7540{3 . Computor Consulung 7540{rl . HR Consultant 7140{2 . Rosld€ndal Counsolor Tnining 7550 .Temporary hslP 7580 . Donatgd prof.aslonal serylces 7585.G|fts ln Kind (Contra to 14130 above) Total 7500' Fsos for Profossloml S€ryices 7600. lntern Program 7601 .lntern Fss 7602.Amrlcorps F*3 Total 7600 . lntBrn Program 7700. Cll.nt Exponso3 n56. THP Apartmnts€tuP 755 .THP Cllont ErDeGEs rI05.Cllont Food 77 10. Program Supplio3 7715. Msdlcal tlyglom 7725 . R.crsatlon Tf3O .Transportauon 7735 . Allowanca/SPec Asslstanco 77/O . Rent Subsldy 7745.Glfts Tf50 . Vloloncs Prcvonuon Summit 7700. Cllont Expon36. Olh€r Total r'00 .Cllont Expen3es 7800 . Organlatlonal Cost3 8615 . Lite Fms & lnt3 6st 7805.County AED Fs3 7815 . Stato L/0 Dapl 7820 . [:b Testlng 7825.State Llcencas 8710. lnsumnc6 8810' MemboBhlp due3 9130. Bank charg6 & crodlt card dlsc 9230. Organkatlon l(coD) oxporcet Total 7800. Oroanlzauoml Cort8 8000 . Occupancy srp.c. 8012 . Ront (Lo.rehold lmprovmtt DGpn) E038. O6pn on Ls:r€hold lmprovomnB E070. R€locatlon Erp.nt. 8010'Rent&perklng 8015.Scurlty E020{1 . Eloctrlcity- G.t 8020{t3 'Water, Strs, Garbago 3,634 60 600 7.6sy. 1.50% 3.00% 2.147.405 120,571 3,259 5,798 170,027 33,339 66,678 0 10,450 0 1,000 2,000 0 0 0 24,999 12,U5 0 27,492 0 2n,957 2,720 7,996 4,886 -343002 9000 -2000 -5000 1,804,403 120,571 3,259 5,798 170,027 33,339 75,678 0 10,450 0 1,000 2,000 0"0 0 24,999 12,U5 2,600 68,699 18,141 15,214 2,150 3,510 't,975 2,250 3,400 500 10,000 0 a s 5 4821 8,000 8,000t- ,q34s 2,600 68,699 18, t41 17,214 2,150 3,510 1,975 2,250 8,400 500 10,000 1,200 25,367 3,952 5,985 300 10,000 29,600 1,396 2,400 2,000f- stroo I 't28.439 1,200 25,367 3,952 5,985 300 10,000 29,600 1,396 2,400 0 27,492 0 277,957 2,720 7,996 4,886 I s s 5 10,149t- 48sdl 10,149l-- 48srsl 0l-raqnrl YFA EXPENSE BUDGET W NET INCOME PROJECTICN JULY 2OO2TJUNE 2OO3 AGENCY (oLD)AOJMNT IUIAL AGENCY REVISEO 8020.04 C:bI. ry 8025. Faclllty liLltr!.Mnca 81133 . Bulldlng Rop:lr 80.|! . P.r.omlprop.rty t x€. 8O{5 . 510690 80c0 . Clo.rrnCc.rd.nlng Sorvlcos Total 8000 Occupancy €Iponlo !x,00 . Fuftl D.v.lopnEnt Erp6mo! 9O0a . Gr.nt W.lUnC Wdlchop 9001 .Publlc R.hdoB lOl,!. Fundnl.l.g. other.46ru.. Tot l !,000.Fund lro.loprBnt E:p.n..t 8100.Ofllce Exporsog 78'10. Tslophon. & toloconl.nuniotionr 781041 . Tol.phon. 7810.02.lntsmot 7910. Postag., shlpphg, d.livory 8105. Omc. Suppll.s 8115.EqulpCh.rga. 8115{1. Equlpmot Lsa5o/R6nt l 6115{2. Eq0rpmntRop.ir E115.03. EqolD,n nt MehtoEncg E115{X . En6.ril Equlp Purchas€/RorLl 8200 .Admln Equlp Ch.Be. 8200{1 .Copl.r ErrBnso. 8200{2 . Equlpmorn R€ntallDepn) 8210.Prlnung&copylng 1220 . Aook., tubrcripuonr, rder€nc. 1550. O6pr & anb.t..llMblo 9:60 . Cllrr6r co*t Totrl 110{ . Ofilc. Erp.B.t 8500 .Sbfl Er!.B.. !!i?0 .Yodn Sop.rd. 85lo{5 . Ao.d fElnlng. 83lo itll.ag.l Tr.v6l 4510n'l . M6.tlng Costr 1510{2 . Conter.nc. F... . Mgt Rolroal t510{3. NNYFC l5l oi:t ' Cod€r.nc. F€.r . G.mal 1510{6 . Youlh F.llo$ Ttrlnlng/O.l.nt 85r0.{7 . CCY/WSYSN 85r0{r. ccYFc 0510{9.WSYSN Bo.d 8520 . St n E4n (v.dous) 8siltl. Volunto.. Erp.d.o. E535 - 6dlsl EI:nl. !3O. Flnqorrrlni/DMv/Chlld AD!.. l5a5 CPRTElnlng 1555 . R.crulh.nt &160 . Eft'ploy.. R.colnltofl 1820 . SEn fr.lnlnCodrlopn!.nl Tot l8500.St fl E4.n3.r 1,674 8,370 2,960 360 't,200 52 41,141 5,687 11,437 16,391 3,659 15,296 2,1U 5,07E 5,057 0 878 (3) 29,078 23,266 0 24,000 '1,500 16,268 6,125 3,500 2,000 10,259 3,400 2,000 2,500 500 0 1,202 150 1,501 665 1,905 2,562 -2000 -1000 -1500 -3000 1,67 4 8,370 2,960 360 39,14,| 5,687 '11,437 14,391 3,659 15,29l3 2,1U 5,078 . 5,057'0 878 (3) 29,078 2,382 23,266 0 24,000 0 16,268 6,125 500 2,000 10,259 3,400 2,000 2,500 500 0 1,202 150 1,501 665 13,905 2,9152 240 881 -2000 162,582 157.582 t10o D/3tan 35'l 12000 n 5007 0 700 0 700 I 96 87 788 TOTAI DIRECT COSTS (340,002)3,09,1,56'l TOTAL REVENUE s 3,270,851 NET INCOME $ 176,290 4,638T---;;1L-----------l:99 - - zu CO!|[IU* t C,{T ION REeEI'"i€f ; AFTER PREPARAI|CIi'I ST.AFF RTFOP BROADWAY BUSII\ESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1399 Broadway, Burlingame, CA 94010 ) !dC^P November 20,2002 Mayor Coffey & The City Council Burlingame, City Hall 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Changing Zoning on Broadway Honorable Mayor & City Council: our present zoning. Thank you for your good work. Ross President, B.I.D. I'm writing to clear up a misconception that the Broadway B.LD., and the merchants in general, wish to change the zoning on Broadway. We put the matter to a vote of the B.I.D. Board of Directors at the November 12th meeting, and we, in fact, wish to retain RECEIVED Nov 2 ?,?007- CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. @t, Z-x E m H ffiE (, H! t E <A> 3 ->te t \f,ort- !r) gE m -rm(] ffi o, ! a o ,z &) UG A l^ t_t ET TI E UJ\, = d N d = (E ffi sffits tsEE] \a- 3ts ESB GARBIS S. BEZDJIAN .,0 BENRYESSA\trAY HrLr-sBoRoucE, ca 94{110 HONORABLE T\,[AYOR MARY JANNEY AND CTIY COTINCIL MEMBERS 5OI PRIMROSEROAD BURLINGAME, CA 9 4010.3997 Honorable Mayor Janney and Burlingame City Council Members: I am writing this letter to you regarding the p,ropcrty we owq namely Broadway Plaza al I199 Broadway, Burlingame. For the last year, this building has hd a,95o/o v*,arcy through no fault ofours. We have been receiving numerous phone calls and almost 90% ofthe callers want to open a rest&urant. Unfornrnately, the Planning Department will not allow any restaurants: even spocialty ralrtaurants like Frdnc[ Greek or Armenian All applicants were denied a license application Recently a dentist approached us and was very interested in leasing about 1400sq.fr. for a dental care bushess. I checked the dentist's background extensively and leamcd that she is highly qualified. This is a decent, reputable and legitimate scrvice oriented business, which will only eotance the inragp of &oaduray and will benefit the other businesses. I arI sure all the merchsots will welcome &is enterprise because it will crearc foot traffic, which the merchanrs tbrive on- lilhat I am trying to do is to endorse only legitimate busiaesses and reliable teoants u/ho will safoguard the essence of the city, augment the city's reventre ord boost its aura" As I mentioned abovg I am extremely carefrrl in selecting tenants and I have been scteening every prospeoq especially after the bitter experience we had with Galleria de Farsb- Almost all the merchants and residents resented tlrem and were repulsed by their business ethics, even the City ofBurlingqme disliked their business conduct. I fought hard to rcmove them and finally my aftotuey was able to evict them cven though their lease had not expired. This well maintained and attractive building has been vacant for a year. Every caller who is interested in leasing the spoce wonders wtry the building has been vacant for so long. They want to know ifthere is a problem sinoe the rcnt we are ashng is reasooable and the building is well maintained November 14,2W2 I fervently betieve that you should seriorsly consider the application of the dentist that is in derrand on Broadway. Please agree to grant the dentist the permit so she can ruo her business. lv{rs. Monroe informed me that processing the application would take about six (6) months dtre to her department's heavy load. t,et us be realistig urho will wait six months to get a permit? It that is the Gase, we will loose this tenant, the city wilt forfeit the revenue and we will hurt financially as we have been for the last year. Please don't prolong our anguish and cause us serious financial hardship. Thark you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions, (650) 343459 or my cell at (650) 302-9355. Sincerely, /*;4 4q4; Garbis S. Bezdjian Cc: Ms Margaret Monroe, Planning Department Iv{r. larry Anderson, City Attorney The City of Burlingame CTTY HALL 5OI PRIMROSE ROAD BLTRLIIIGAII{F"CALIFORNIA 940Lc]9qI TEL: (650)55&7250 FAX: (6sO)69G3790PLANNINGDEPARTMENT November 7,2002 Mr. Garbis Bezdjian 40 Berryessa Way Hillsborouglq CA 94010 Dear Mr.Bezdjian, I regret the delay in responding to your visit and the letter you zubmitted from the Broadway Business Impiovement Oisirict rcg"raing th" rr* ofyour property at 1199 Broadway, zoned C-l Broadway Commercial Area. In my discussion with you at the counter it seemed that you understood that to put a dentist office and/or food establishment at this location would require an amendment to the zoning code since presently both uses are prohibited in the Broadway Commercial Area. This was confirmed by a phone call we had later when you acknowledged the same and we discussed the timing for an amendment to the General Plan and a change in the zoning requirements. As I told you at that time such a change would probably take 6 months to process, ifit was unconteste{ and very likely longer if it was contested; and the outcome is uncertain. The letter from the Broadway Business Improvement District dated October 30,2}O2,which you left with me, indicates that they felt that the city should consider variances to allow a dentist office in 1.i00 SF on the first floor and to allow a restaurant to locate at one of the tenant spaces on the site. This sounds as if the BID was unawarethatboth oftheseuses are presentlyprohibited intheBroadwayBusiness ImprovemantDistrict. By$ate law variances cannot be granted when a use is prohibited. The letter certainly does not endorse the kind ofch4nge in the ptanning policy (General Plan) and zoning which would be required to process an application for such uses on this site, i.e. a[owing first floor offices and food establishments as a matter of right or permit on any property in the Broadway Commercial Area. Under the present code, office uses on the first floor in the Broadway Commercial Area are prohibited along with health services and banks. This has been the case since 1975 when the merchants in the Broadway District asked to have the same regulatory protection as the merchants on Burlingame Avenue had. In 1985 the merchants on Burlingame Avenue requested that the number of food establishments be regulated in order to protect the "pedestrian oriented retail charactef ofthe Avenue. The Broadway merchants asked for the same protection. That regulation w:Ls revised in a major way in 1999; and again the Broadway merchants asked for the same protections. Presently there are 24 food establishments in the Broadway Commercial Area, the current regulations statethat whenthenumberoffood establishments intheBroadway CommercialAreafallbelow 23for 1 12 consecutive months, the city shall review the appropriate number. Until that time the number and location of food establishments on Broud*uy are fixed. Thereforg new ones at new locations are-prohibited unless the regulation of food establishmentsis abandoned. It did not appear that the intention of the BID's letter was to abandon regulation of food establishments on Broadway' In light ofthe confusion ofwhat the BID board was endorsing, I would sugges! that you contact them again and discuss whether it was their intention to zupport a structural change in the planning policy and zoning of the Broadway Commercial Area. If you intend to pursue an application for a General Plan Amendment and ar implementing change to the zomng reiuirements foi the Brona*uv Commercial Area please know that the processing time is likely to be closer to one year than 6 months, particularly if the request is contested. It is difficult for me to estimate the cost of this activity since an environmental document is involved. Gven current work loads, the City would probably hire a "o*rit*t, for which you would pay, to undertake this effort. The proposed revisions will be zubject to a number of public hearings, including the text of any the zoning changes' Some property owners, who are interested in undert4king actions which involve significant pollcy changes and implemening'zontng"h*go, have initiated their ideaby sending a letter setting out the nature ofthe change to the attention of the "City 6.**l and planning Commission for acknowledgement. This gives these bodies an opportunity to comment to staffon whether the policy iszue is one that ought to be considered furttrer at this time- This is an option for you to consider. I hope that this addresses your questions- Sincerely yours, YV"flffi^M Margartt Monroe City Planner cc. Larry Anderson, City AttorneY Ross Bruce, President, BroadwaY BID 2 N(-zu )!dc{Jd.*t}{ u BROADWAY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1399 Broadway, Burlingame, CA 94010 October 30,2002 Planning Commission Ciry Hell 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: 1199 Broadway Dear Planning Commissioners : The Broadway Merchants request that you consider two variances for the 1199 Broadway building: m g$ l. That the city consider allowing a dentist office in the small 1,300 square feet 3 space on the first floor of 1199 Broadway. We currently have no dentist on Broadway, and one could be handy. 2. That the city consider allowing a restaurant to locate at one of the I199 Broadway spaces, provided that it wasn't a redundant use. We believe that more retail could follow on the heels of a vibrant restaurant destination, and if we were to make an exception for an exceptional restaurant, then the community would be well 'served'. Bruce tlorr-(, a a ,-z d2 dG, l}, lr. l-t IEHH HffidF- II 6Zdro Ntu (, )>z7 EB H E ffiE B I E <^>f,->rn -Fm(, ffi c t President, Broadway BIDqE ffi tsffi8 )z- 3E tsEB ,, t-