No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2004.06.21 OLMINKMEBURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, June 21, 2004 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 1 of 3 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 CLOSED SESSION: a. Threatened litigation- Claim of Douglas Weaver 6:45 p.m. Conference Room A 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. ROLL CALL 3. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 7, 2004 Approve 4. PRESENTATION a. Recognition award to Police Chief Jack Van Etten from Presentation the San Mateo County Tobacco Prevention Program for his support and commitment to Penal Code 308 b. Introduce Intern Sonya Knudsen of the San Francisco Introduction Airport museum and the Aviation Library museum 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Annual review of Amusement Permits: Alibi Club, 220 Hearing/Action Lorton Avenue; American Bull Restaurant, 1817-19 El Camino Real; Behan's Irish Pub,1327 Broadway; Burlingame Station Brewery,321 California Drive; California Bar& Grill, 241 California Drive; Caribbean Gardens,1306 Old Bayshore Hwy; Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1177 Airport Blvd.;Dicey Riley's, Irish Pub, 221 Park Road; Dollarwise/Hobby Unlimited, 1205 Broadway; El Torito, 1590 Bayshore Blvd.; Fanny & Alexander, 1108 Burlingame Avenue;/303-305 California Drive; Faudorin Restaurant, 1492 Bayshore Blvd.; Four Green Fields,1107 Burlingame Avenue; GoKart Racer, 1541 Adrian Road; Grandview Restaurant,1107 Howard Avenue; Hola Mexican Restaurant,1448 Burlingame Avenue; Hyatt Hotel, Knuckles & Atrium, 1333 Bayshore Blvd.; Il Piccolo, 1219 Broadway; Matsusono, 1150 Paloma Avenue; Max's Opera Cafe, 1250 Bayshore Blvd.; Sheraton Gateway Hotel, 600 Airport Blvd.; Towles Cafe, 1401 Burlingame Avenue; 261 California Drive, 261 California Drive b. FY 2004-05 Budget Adoption& Gann Limit Resolutions 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M. Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law) prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. eBURUNGAME BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, June 21, 2004 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 2 of 3 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Fresh Market Relocation Discuss b. Consider Reintroduction of Ordinance regarding EMF Reintroduce exposures to provide alternative to distance standards C. Introduce Ordinance to amend development fees for public Introduce improvements in the Bayfront Specific Area Plan d. School Crossing Guard contract Direction e. Consider appointments to the Library Board Appoint 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution accepting Burlinghome/Easton subdivision nos. 5 and 7 water main replacement project, Phase 1 b. Resolution approving a professional services agreement with Kennedy Jenks Consultants for design of seismic retrofit of Mills Tank and routing study for Mills Transmission water main C. Resolution approving Amendment No. 2 to agreement with Parking Company of America for hotel shopper shuttle services expanded hours d. Resolution approving professional services contract with Underground Construction Managers for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase 2 e. Approval of Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center Mediation Services contract for FY 2004-05 f. Approval of Burlingame Chamber of Commerce Promotional Services contract for FY 04-05 g. Affirm payment commitment to Consultant to evaluate EMF provisions of proposed EMF Ordinance h. Warrants& Payroll 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, April 27, 2004; Beautification, June 3, 2004; Traffic Safety and Parking, June 10, 2004; Planning, June 14, 2004 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLINGAME JRegular Meeting - Monday, June 21, 20M CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 3 of 3 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 b. Department Reports: Finance, May, 2004 C. Letter from Comcast concerning programming adjustment to the digital music choice services 13. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.or-g. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Monday,July 19,2004 CITY C BVRLINGAME °0 4 qm �NYT[D JUNE 6 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of June 7, 2004 CLOSED SESSION: CA Anderson advised that Council had met in closed session before the public meeting and instructed the City Attorney on the handling of the following claims: a. Pending Litigation (Government Code § 54956.9(a): Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line—CPUC Proceeding A 02-09-043 b. Threatened Litigation (Government code § 54956.9(b)(1), (3)(c)) One matter—Pacific Gas & Electric Company 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Frank Pagliaro. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan,Nagel, O'Mahony MEMBERS ABSENT: None Mayor O'Mahony requested a moment of silence for the 40th President of the United States, President Ronald Wilson Reagan, who passed away on June 5, 2004. 4. MINUTES A correction was made to the minutes of May 17, 2004, Item 9. a., last line, to change the word "cote" to "vote." Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve the minutes of the May 17, 2004 Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 1 Burlingame City Council June 7, 2004 Unapproved Minutes 5. CEREMONIAL a. INTRODUCE NEW BATTALION CHIEF, DREW FLINDERS FC Reilly introduced Drew Flinders who was promoted as the first Battalion Chief for the Central County Fire Department. FC Reilly also introduced Don Dornell who was promoted as the first Deputy Fire Chief for the Central County Fire Department. b. RECOGNITION OF STUDENTS FROM OLA RECORD-BREAKING TRACK MEET RS Blondino introduced the Our Lady of Angels track team who broke five track records at this year's meet. Mayor O'Mahony presented the awards. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1736 TO AMEND THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CAPERS) TO PROVIDE FOR SECTION 20965 CREDIT FOR UNUSED SICK LEAVE AND SECTION 21037 CANCELLATION OF PAYMENT FOR OPTIONAL SERVICE CREDIT FOR LOCAL FIRE MEMBERS HRD Bell recommended Council hold a public hearing to amend the contract between the City of Burlingame and Ca1PERS to provide for Section 20965, Credit for Unused Sick Leave and Section 21037, Cancellation of Payment for Optional Service Credit for Local Fire members. Mayor O'Mahony opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to adopt Ordinance#1736 amending the contract between the City of Burlingame and the California Public Employees' Retirement System (Ca1PERS) to provide for Section 20965, Credit for Unused Sick Leave and Section 21037, Cancellation of Payment for Optional Service Credit for Local Fire members; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote 5-0. Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Musso publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. b. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1737 AMENDING THE STANDARDS FOR PLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACKS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DPW Bagdon recommended Council hold a public hearing to amend the standards for placement and maintenance of newsracks in the public right-of-way. Mayor O'Mahony opened the public hearing. Jeannie Gilmore, 1431 Carlos Avenue, spoke on the history of the original newsrack ordinance. There were no further comments from the floor and the hearing was closed. 2 Burlingame City Council June 7,2004 Unapproved Minutes Councilman Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance#1737 amending the standards for placement and maintenance of newsracks in the public right-of-way; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel, approved unanimously by voice vote 5-0. Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Musso publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. C. DIRECTION ON PROPOSED SOUNDWALL ALONG WEST SIDE OF U.S. 101 FREEWAY FROM CORBITT DRIVE TO CADILLAC WAY DPW Bagdon requested Council approve a 16-foot high soundwall from Corbitt Drive to 100 feet north of Toyon Drive and provide direction to staff regarding the soundwall from 100 feet north of Toyon Drive to Cadillac Way. John Hessler of David Powers Associates and CE Murtuza gave a joint presentation regarding the soundwall. Staff received petitions with 211 signatures from local residents. Northpark Apartments' units start on the second floor, and a soundwall extended farther than 100 feet north of Toyon Drive would not benefit them. Mayor O'Mahony opened the floor for comments. The following citizens spoke in favor of installation of a soundwall: Debbie Flowers, 929 Azalea Avenue; Lisa Rogers, 809 Winchester Drive; Gail Molina, 900 Toyon Drive; Nancy Padilla, 909 Linden Avenue; Sharon Foss, 835 Rollins Road; Chris Knightly, 905 Rollins Road; Linda Wassail, 929 Larkspur Drive; Marianne Saucedo, 925 Larkspur Drive; Bob Molina, Edgehill Road. The following citizens spoke against installation of a soundwall beyond 100 feet north of Toyon Drive: Marvin Pedersen, Lithia Dealership; Jim Hannay, Rector Motors; Joel Steiger, Kuleto's Restaurant; Mike Harvey, Mike Harvey Acura; Tom Stucker, Lithia Dealership. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to recommend to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority the installation of a soundwall 16 feet high from Corbitt Drive tapered to 100 feet north of Toyon Drive; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved by voice vote 3-2 (Baylock and Nagel dissented). 9b. APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR THE EXTENSION OF MEASURE A Mayor O'Mahony moved this item from the Consent Calendar(9b). DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve Resolution No. 52-2004 adopting the Draft Transportation Expenditure Plan dated March 18, 2004, to extend Measure A for a 25-year term beginning January 1, 2009. Joe Hurley, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, spoke on the Measure A draft expenditure plan. Former Councilman Frank Pagliaro spoke on the background of Measure A. Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve Resolution No. 52-2004 adopting the Draft Transportation Expenditure Plan to extend Measure A for a 25-year term beginning January 1, 2009; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mary Watt, 139 Primrose Road, spoke about CALL Primrose. Stacey Hawver, 521 E. 5'h Avenue, spoke about the Legal Aid Society. Renie Aubuchon, 141 Alta Mesa, South San Francisco, spoke about Shelter Network. Deb Miller, 875 Stanton Road, spoke about Community Gatepath. Dan Andersen, 728 Vernon 3 Burlingame City Council June 7, 2004 Unapproved Minutes Way, spoke on the PG&E transmission line installation on Trousdale. Marianne Saucedo, 925 Larkspur Drive, spoke on Safeway. Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on community groups funding requests. Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington Way, spoke on Burlingame Historical Society. John Root, 1407 Montero Avenue, spoke on non-profit funding. 8. STAFF REPORTS a. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Councilwoman Baylock recommended reappointment to the Planning Commission of Ralph Osterling. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to reappoint Ralph Osterling to the Planning Commission; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. FY 2004-05 COMMUNITY GROUPS FUNDING REQUESTS CM Nantell reviewed FD Nava's matrix of each Councilmember's recommendation for funding. Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to support Mayor O'Mahony's recommendation of approving $46,575 for community group funding; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by roll call vote, 5- 0. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION #53-2004 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO INCORPORATE THE LAYOFF POLICY INTO THE CITY OF BURLINGAME'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES—SECTION 4 PERSONNEL HRD Bell recommended Council approve Resolution#53-2004 authorizing the City Manager to incorporate the Layoff Policy into the City of Burlingame's Administrative Procedures. C. (1) RESOLUTION #50-2004 AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,987,192 TO JMB CONSTRUCTION FOR BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT, PHASE II; AND (2) RESOLUTION #51-2004 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $280,365 WITH THE CULVER GROUP FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT DPW Bagdon recommended Council approve (1) Resolution#50-2004 awarding construction contract in the amount of$1,987,192 to JMB Construction for Burlinghome Easton Water Main Replacement, Phase II; and (2) Resolution #51-2004 approving a professional services agreement in the amount of$280,365 with The Culver Group for construction management of the main replacement project. d. RESOLUTION #54-2004 AUTHORIZING A DESIGNATION PERIOD TO OFFER THE TWO YEARS ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT FOR MISCELLANEOUS AND SAFETY EMPLOYEES WITH THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CaIPERS) HRD Bell recommended Council approve Resolution #54-2004 authorizing a designation period to offer two years additional service credit for miscellaneous and safety employees with the California Public 4 Burlingame City Council June 7,2004 Unapproved Minutes Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS). e. REJECTION OF ALL BIDS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR STAFF TO READVERTISE THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, PHASE 2 DPW Bagdon recommended Council reject all bids and authorize staff to readvertise the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 2. Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings they each attended on behalf of the City. 11. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 12. NEW BUSINESS a. Vice Mayor Galligan received from Foster City the process they went through in obtaining an agreement with the school district for crossing guards. Police Chief Van Etten will attend the next liaison meeting with the school district for Burlingame regarding safety issues. The main issues are designation of support check funding and contract responsibilities. CM Nantell clarified that the checks should be made out to the School Crossing Guard Fund. Councilwoman Baylock requested this item be added to the next Agenda. b. Vice Mayor Galligan asked about the processing of a petition or proposal on Safeway as an agenda item in the future; requested CA Anderson research. c. Mayor O'Mahony stated that Virgin Airlines' decision will take another couple of months before deciding on location of their local operations for SFO and thanked the Chamber of Commerce for their support in providing Virgin Airlines information on Burlingame. d. Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to add to this Agenda the consideration for City of Burlingame to participate in the National Day of Mourning for the passing of former President Ronald Reagan on Friday, June 11, 2004; seconded by Vice Mayor Galligan, approved by roll call vote, 4-1, (Nagel dissented). HRD Bell discussed various options for the City to observe. City facilities will remain open and services will be available to the public. A Book of Remembrance will be placed at City Hall for a period of one week giving community members an opportunity to express their appreciation of President Reagan's leadership and public service. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 Burlingame City Council June 7,2004 Unapproved Minutes a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, March 4 & May 6, 2004; Traffic, Safety and Parking, May 13, 2004; Planning, May 24, 2004 b. Department Reports: Police, April 2004; Building, May 2004 c. Letter from Major General David Petraeus, 101"Airborne Division, Fort Campbell, Kentucky thanking the City for adopting Bravo Company, 1 S`Battalion d. Letter from Comcast concerning elimination of the Tech TV channel 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting at 9:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen Deputy City Clerk 6 Burlingame City Council June 7, 2004 Unapproved Minutes CITY G AGENDA 5a ,�,i• a. ITEM# BURLINGAME MTG. a, DATE 6/21/2004 STAFF REPORT 1i uwe 6,900 To: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMIT BY DATE: June 11, 2004 APPRO D BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, Cijy Attorney SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW AND RENEWAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMITS RECOMMENDATION: Review existing amusement permits ready for June renewal and renew the following amusement permits for a 12-month period: American Bull Bar Four Green Fields Behan's Irish Pub Grandview Burlingame Station Brewery Hola Mexican Restaurant California Bar& Grill Hyatt Hotel Caribbean Gardens Il Piccolo Crowne Plaza Hotel Matsusono Restaurant Dollarwise/Hobby Unlimited Max's Opera Cafe El Torito Sheraton Gateway Hotel Faudorin Restaurant Towles Cafe Renew the following permits for only six (6)months because the establishments are still evolving and summer will be a good time to continue to verify the performance: Alibi Club Fanny & Alexander Blush (261 California Drive) Cancel the following amusement permit as the establishment has changed name and ownership without application for an amusement permit: Dicey Riley's Irish Pub DISCUSSION: Each June, the Police Department reports on the status of ongoing amusement permits granted by the City Council, and the Council determines whether to renew the permits. The Police Department has completed its review, which is summarized below. The attachment summarizes amusement permits in the City. Mayor and Council Re: Annual Review and Renewal of Amusement Permits June 11, 2004 Page 2 Each of the permit holders was notified of the Council review. REVIEW OF INDIVIDUAL PERMITS The Alibi Club. It is recommended that the establishment continue on 6-month renewal. The Alibi Club has calmed down a good deal (17 calls for service over the past six months), but they still have higher than average number of calls for establishments in the City and a new amusement permit will probably open nearby in the next few months. However,they are about average for the Burlingame Avenue area and have worked with the Police Department to resolve the situation. American "Bull" Bar & Grill. There were 6 calls for service and only two were considered disruptive— basically the same as last year. This establishment continues to be a model of good management at this time. Behan's Irish Pub. There were 20 reported calls for service, and four for disruptive behavior. The establishment seems to be running fairly well at this time. Blush (261 California Drive). This establishment has not yet opened, so it is recommended that this extension only be for 6 months. Burlingame Station Brewery. There have been 13 calls for service to the Brewery over the past year. Four calls involved a disturbance, but three of those were calls from the establishment to remove disruptive patrons. California Bar& Grill. There were only 19 calls for service, almost three times the previous year's calls, and ten involved problems of intoxication. This establishment probably bears monitoring over the summer to see it should be placed on shorter review cycle. Caribbean Gardens. There have been 31 calls for service over the past year. This marks a return to some problems the establishment has had in the past, so the Department will continue to monitor the situation to see if it should be placed on a shorter review period. Crowne Plaza Hotel. The hotel restaurant and bar have not had any calls for service over the past year. Dicey Rily's Irish Pub. The business has been sold to a new owner and re-named. The amusement permit should be canceled as it is nontransferable. Dollarwise/Hobby Unlimited. The establishment has had a permit for 5 video machines for over two years. The Department has monitored the situation and has found that the owners are carefully meeting legal requirements for the sales of various merchandise in the store. Given the store's efforts, the Department is recommending that the store be placed on annual review. El Torito. The establishment has had 16 calls for service, but only one involving a disturbance, and that was in the parking lot. Mayor and Council Re: Annual Review and Renewal of Amusement Permits June 11, 2004 Page 3 Fanny & Alexander. The establishment has been open about 4 years. The Department has responded to 53 calls for service in the past 6 months, with 29 of them related to disturbances. The establishment continues to make strong efforts on crowd control and customer screening (a number of the calls are initiated by management for assistance), but there continues to be troubling violent behavior by patrons. Left at Albuquerque closed at the end of last year, so Fanny& Alexander may have inherited some of its patrons. Therefore, it is recommended that this permit be renewed for only 6 months. Fandorin Restaurant. The City has had only 2 calls for service, and only one involved an unruly patron. Four Green Fields. The City has not received any complaints and only 2 calls for service. Go-kart Racer. The establishment has been open about 6 months with 14 calls for service, but only one related to management requesting assistance with patrons. Grandview. There have been 3 calls for service and none related to entertainment. Hola Mexican Restaurant. Hola has started to increase its calls once again. There were 44 over the past year, with 8 being related to disturbances. Noise from the establishment is a concern and the Department has been monitoring that aspect. Hyatt Regency Hotel. There have been 4 calls related to disturbances at the Knuckles Sports Bar or Lobby/Atrium. All calls were initiated by the Hotel. Il Piccolo. There have been 4 calls for service, but none related to disturbances. Matsusono Restaurant. There have been no calls for service, and this establishment should be placed on an annual review schedule. Max's Opera Cafe. There has been only one call for service and that was to assist the bartender in preventing an intoxicated individual from driving a vehicle. Sheraton Gateway Hotel (formerly Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza). There has been one call for service involving a disturbance at the hotel bar.. Towles Cafe. This amusement permit was approved about a year ago. There have been no reported problems or complaints, so this should be placed on an annual review schedule. Attachments Table summary of existing amusement permits Distribution Chief of Police OPERATOR ADDRESS TYPE Alibi Club 220 Lorton Avenue Occasional entertainment—live band, acoustical and rock American Bull Bar 1817-19 El Camino Coin-operated machines Jazz band twice monthly— Sat. evening or Sunday afternoon Lounge music with up to 2 performers Private party w/disc jockey Behan's Irish Pub 1327 Broadway Entertainers on Saturdays and recorded music on Sundays from 9:30 p.m. to 1 a.m. Blush(261 California 261 California Drive Live music, disc jockey or recorded music, 5 p.m. to 1:30 a.m., Drive) seven days a week Burlingame Station 321 California Dr. Billiards Brewery Live music on Fridays and Saturdays with no dancing California Bar& Grill 241 California Dr. Karaoke music for singing and dancing on Friday and Saturday nights and lingerie fashion shows on Wednesday and Friday afternoons from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.; and live bands no more than 10 nights during a year from 7 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. Caribbean Gardens 1306 Bayshore Hwy. Night club with dj, live music and dancing—Wed. thru Sunday, 6:00 p.m. to 2 a.m. Security guard required at closing. No private parties Crowne Plaza Hotel 1177 Airport Blvd. Piano player, trio or 4-piece band in lounge, restaurant, and lobby Dicey Rileys' Irish 221 Park Road Irish music and karaoke music between the hours of 10 Pub a.m. and 1 a.m. Dollarwise/Hobby 1205 Broadway 5 video machines Unlimited 10:30 to 7:30 El Torito 1590 Bayshore Blvd. Music and dancing earlier Now karaoke 1 OPERATOR ADDRESS TYPE Fanny&Alexander 1108 Burlingame Live Music and Dancing from 9 p.m.to 2 a.m.,Monday Av./303-305 through Saturday California Drive Fandorin Restaurant 1492 Bayshore Blvd. Dancing,live band,and recorded music on Sundays from 11:30 a.m.to 10 p.m.and on Fridays and Saturdays from 11:30 a.m.to 1 a.m. Four Green Fields 1107 Burlingame Av. Live music indoors between 12 noon and 9 p.m. GoKart Racer 1541 Adrian Road Up to 20 video games and 2 billiard tables Grandview 1107 Howard Ave. Karaoke from 10 p.m.to 1:30 a.m. Hola Mexican 1448 Burlingame Live music and dj 11 a.m.to 11 p.m.,Sunday and Restaurant Avenue Monday,11 a.m.to 2 a.m.Tuesday thru Saturday Hyatt Hotel-Knuckles 1333 Bayshore Blvd. Piano music and singers in Atrium and Dawson's 7 days a &Atrium week Up to 2 special events per month on conditions Il Piccolo 1219 Broadway Music on Thursday night;Poetry on Wednesday night;and live entertainment on Sunday afternoons Matsusono 1150 Paloma Avenue Karaoke seven nights a week 6 p.m.to 11 p.m. Max's Opera Cafe 1250 Bayshore Blvd. Piano playing and singers,7 nights a week Sheraton Gateway 600 Airport Blvd. Piano bar in lounge Hotel Towles Cafe 1401 Burlingame Av. Live music 12 noon to 11 p.m.(Longer hours approved 7/2003) 2 City of Burlingame lbAWM44EI Parks & Recreation Department 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California 94010-2899 ° Telephone (650) 558-7300 * Email: recreation@burlingaame.or �' << June 18, 2004 Burlingame City Council 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mayor & City Council Members, At the June 17th Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commissioners discussed the proposed 2004-05 budget for the Parks & Recreation Department. Recognizing the difficult budget decisions the Council must make, including the State takeaways and the staff reductions, the Commissioners would like to express their support for the Department's proposed Capital Improvement projects. Planned projects for the upcoming year include: Bringing two playgrounds up to ADA and playground safety standards Automating an irrigation system in Washington Park Improving and relocating the restroom at Bayside Park Completing the BART Landscaping project Each of the proposed projects will add value to the community, without using any of the City's General Funds. These projects have been part of the City's long-range plans and are important for safety reasons, code compliance, reduction of potential injuries, lower maintenance needs and reduced risk of lawsuit. We ask that you allow these Capital Improvement Projects to continue as planned. Sincerely, G� Ed Lario , Chairman Parks and Recreation Commission CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 5b �Dq Ao MTG. 6/21/04 ADNATED JUNE D DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BY DATE: June 21, 2004 APP VED BY FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: FY 2004-05 Budget Adoption and Gann Limit Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: That City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the resolutions in the following order: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Adopting Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Burlingame Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2005." "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Establishing 2004-2005 Appropriation Limit for City of Burlingame Pursuant to Article XIII(B) of the California Constitution." BACKGROUND: The City Council held a Budget Study Session on June 1, 2004 to review the Proposed Budget for FY 2004-05. An overview of the proposed budget was presented at the study session. Each member of the Council then presented a report on their individual review of departments' budgets. The Council also provided direction on funding for community groups. The recommended funding levels were approved on June 7, 2004. The FY 2003-04 budget totals that are recommended for adoption are as follows: Revenues: $65,209,759 Expenditures: $65,209,759 Proposed Adopted Amendments Budget Budget to the Budget General Fund...................................................... $ 34,006,894 $ 34,006,894 $ -0- Water, Sewer, Parking and Waste Enterprise Funds......... $ 18,829,131 $ 18,994,131 $ +165,000 Financing Authority and Shuttle Grant........................ $ 1,616,734 $ 1,686,734 $ +70,000 Capital Improvements Fund..................................... $ 10,522,000 $ 10,522,000 $ -0- Total Budget........................................................$ 64,974,759 $ 65,209,759 $ +235,000 The amendments are made for the following reasons: Sewer Fund: Add $ 135,000 ($110,000 Indirect Cost Allocation and $25,000 Part-time Salaries) Solid Waste Fund: Add $ 30,000 (Business District Sidewalk Steam Cleaning) Shuttle Bus Fund: Add $ 70,000 (Burlingame Shopper Shuttle Expansion) Total Amendments: $ 235,000 Each of the new expenditures has corresponding revenues in the respective fund. The proposed amendments have implications for the General Fund. ARTICLE XIII(B) APPROPRIATION LIMIT (GANN LIMIT) Article XIII(B) of the State Constitution limits all state and local government budgets to a formula based upon the 1978-79 budget plus adjustments for cost of living and population changes. In 1990, voters approved modifications to permit use of the percentage change in commercial assessed valuation to increase the limit under certain conditions. In addition, major capital improvements were excluded from the appropriation subject to the limit. Other exceptions are allowed for service charges, Federal grants and mandated programs. The Appropriation Limit pursuant to Article XIII (B)has been calculated and reviewed by the City's audit firm. The City continues to be well below its appropriation limit of$ 47,018,764. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A. FY 2004-05 Budget Adoption Resolution Attachment B. FY 2004-05 Appropriation Limit Resolution RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30,2005 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME that: WHEREAS, the City prepares an annual budget to plan expenditures in light of expected revenues; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the proposed budget from the City Manager, conducted a public study session on January 24, 2004, and June 1, 2004, and conducted a public hearing on June 21, 2003, and the Council has received all testimony and documentation submitted in connection with the budget; and WHEREAS, the proposed budget as submitted and amended makes wise choices in spending and funding among competing programs and services, NOW, THEREFORE, IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The operating and capital improvement budget requirements for the coming year of the City of Burlingame as detailed in the copy of the Budget on file in the Office of the City Clerk are hereby adopted for the City of Burlingame for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. 2. The budget total is $65,209,759 and consists of. General Fund of$34,006,894; Water, Sewer, Parking, and Waste Enterprises $18,994,131; Capital Improvement Fund $10,522,000; and Financing Authority and Shuttle Grant $1,686,734. Mayor 1 I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutions were introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING 2004-2005 APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR CITY OF BURLINGAME PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME that: WHEREAS, in November 1979,the voters of the State of California approved proposition 4, the Gann Appropriation Limit Initiative, which states that beginning July 1, 1980, all state and local government budgets are limited to a formula based upon the 1978-79 budget, plus adjustments for cost of living and population changes, and specific exceptions for service charges, federal and state grants, reserve funds, etc.; and WHEREAS,the State Legislature adopted Government Code Section 7900, implementing Article XIII B of the California Constitution, and Proposition 111 adopted in June 1990 provides new adjustment formulas; and WHEREAS, in accordance with these State laws, the City of Burlingame has prepared documentation establishing the 2004-2005 appropriation limit, and has made this documentation available to the public in the proposed 2004-2005 budget for more than fifteen(15) days before this resolution was adopted, . NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED as follows: 1. For 2004-2005, the City of Burlingame's appropriation limit is $47,018,764. 2. The Adopted Budget for 2004-2005 includes $13,581,122 in appropriations that are subject to the limit, and proceeds of taxes of$25,230,856. 3. For 2004-2005, the City of Burlingame is within the limits of Article XIII B of the California Constitution. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutions were introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk ARTICLE XIII(B)APPROPRIATION LIMIT Article XIII(B)of the State Constitution limits all state and local government budgets to a formula based upon the 1978-79 budget plus adjustments for cost of living and population changes. In 1990,voters approved modifications to permit use of the percentage change in commercial assessed valuation to increase the limit under certain conditions. In addition, major capital improvements were excluded from the appropriation subject to the limit. Other exceptions are allowed for service charges,Federal grants and mandated programs. In accordance with State implementation legislation(SB 1352,Chapter 1205,1980 Statutes) and the League of California Cities Uniform Guidelines,the following is Burlingame's appropriation limit calculation: APPROPRIATION LIMIT 2003-04 Appropriation Limit $45,510,853 Plus Percentage Growth per State 1.033133 2004-05 Appropriation Limit $47,018,764 APPROPRIATION SUBJECT TO LIMIT CALCULATION Proceeds of Taxes $25,230,856 Exclusions: Qualified Capital Projects and Debt (11,649,734) Appropriation Subject to Limit $13,581,122 2004-05 Appropriation Limit $47,018,764 Appropriation Subject to Limit 13,581,122 Over/(Under)Limit ($33,437,642) xxxii BORLINGAME AGENDA STAFF REPORT ITEM# 7a MTG. 06/21/04 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: June 15, 2004 BY APPROVE FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BY s� .� SUBJECT: FRESH MARKET RELOCATION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the relocation of the Fresh Market from Lot W to Park Road south of Burlingame Avenue for a trial period of one month. DISCUSSION: The Chamber of Commerce has requested that the Fresh Market be relocated from Lot W to Park Road south of Burlingame Avenue in order to be closer to the core shopping area. (See attached letter from Bruce Carlton, Chamber Chair and closure plan.) As placing the market in the street rather than in a parking lot presents increased exposure to traffic and access impacts, staff recommends that Council initially approve the relocation for a period of one month to allow time to carefully assess the location before making it permanent. The Chamber has noticed properties on both sides of Park Road between Burlingame Avenue and Howard Avenue regarding the street closure. The businesses along the south side of Burlingame Avenue were also noticed as their properties have rear access along City Hall Lane and an alley which will be restricted due to the market location. Attached is a memo from Georgette Naylor, Chamber President regarding the notice and business feedback. Staff recommends the following permit conditions which are similar to those made for block parties: ► The closure occurs on Sunday between 7:30 a.m. and 1 :30 p.m. ► The Chamber place cones to close the street in accordance with the attached plan and monitor the closure to ensure that the cones are not moved.(The City will provide the Chamber with the cones for their use and storage.) ► The Chamber place "No parking" signs on parking meters in the closure area at least 24 hours in advance. (The City will install fixed "No parking"signage if the market location becomes permanent.) ► The Chamber remove any debris which could create a safety hazard for pedestrians and drivers prior to reopening the street. (The City street sweeper will clean the roadway early Monday morning as part of the regular business district sweeping program.) ► The Chamber continue to use the storage and portable restroom located at Lot W to service the market. Staff will return to Council after the trial period and recommend whether to make the location permanent based on the following criteria: ► Traffic and circulation. The City Traffic Engineer will evaluate traffic safety as well as detour impacts, especially circulation through the parking lots. He will do this through direct observation as well as feedback from the Police Department staff and the public. Page 2... Fresh Market Relocation June 21, 2004 ► Access. The Chamber will contact the businesses in the areas discussed above to obtain feedback. ► Debris. The City Traffic Engineer will assess whether there have been any debris hazards through direct observation as well as feedback from the Police Department staff and the public. EXHIBITS: Chamber letter, closure map, notice and feedback memo FISCAL IMPACT: The City will rely on the Chamber to set up and monitor the street closure as well as obtain business feedback on access issues. The City will not charge the Chamber for cones and will waive the permit fee. c: Bruce Carlton, Chamber Chair Georgette Naylor, Chamber President Jack Van Etten, Police Chief CADmuments and Settmgs\gbagdon\I.oca1 Seftmgffemporary Intemet Files\OLK6D\FreshMarket.stf:w pd BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE May 25, 2004 Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony Vice Mayor Joe Galligan Council Members: Cathy Baylock, Mike Coffey and Terry Nagel Dear Mayor O'Mahony and Council Members: Thank you for your continued support of Burlingame's Fresh Market. The Burlingame Fresh Market is in its seventh year and has proven to be a value to our community. It's a wonderful place to run into friends and neighbors on Sunday mornings and promotes economic development and the vitality of our downtown area. It exposes residents and visitors to stores, restaurants and services offered in Burlingame. It has been said that for every dollar spent at a Farmer's Market, three dollars are spent at surrounding businesses. Many communities have started their own Farmer's Markets in their downtowns. The Fresh Market seeks to maintain our quality vendors and to integrate more closely with the core shopping area thereby attracting more people to our downtown area. But to do this, we need the City's help. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors respectfully requests that the Fresh Market be relocated from parking lot W on Howard Avenue to Park Road starting at Burlingame Avenue. Street closure would be from Burlingame Avenue and Park Road to the beginning of the access to the public parking lot areas (see attached map). Georgette Naylor has contacted Burlingame Police Chief Jack Van Etten and he has expressed no major concerns. There are no emergency access issues. Proposed hours of market operation are 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. each Sunday. We are requesting street closure from 7:30 a.m. until 1:30 p.m. The Chamber will work with Public Works to set up appropriate street closure signage. Businesses that front the proposed closed area are closed for business on Sundays. We hope to relocate the market as soon as possible. Please let us know if you need any further information. Sincerely, _ � r.� =_. :,�= Bruce Carlton Chamber Chair 290 California Drive • Burlingame,CA 94010 • 650.344.1735 • Fax 650.344.1763 e-mail:info@burlingamechamber.org • www.burlingamechamber.org DO NELLY AV I o � I B U R L N G A M E AVE VEHICLE TRAFFIC ROAD CLOSE to i LN CITY N VEHICLE T IC R CLOS b PUBLIC PARKING LOT VEHICLE TRAFFIC PUBLIC PARKING LO 5 � FT, FTI HOWARD AVE L����7 _ Page 1 of 1 PW/ENG-Bagdon,George From: Georgette Naylor[gnaylor@burlingamechamber.org] Sent: Tuesday,June 15,2004 10:59 AM To: gbagdon@burlingame.org Subject:Farmer's Market Relocation George: The attached notice was delivered to merchants on Tuesday,June 8.2004.There have been no negative responses thus far to the relocation. Tina Armstrong,owner of Paper Panache,1227 Burlingame Avenue,is in total support of the relocation,however,stated her concerns regarding Round Table Pizza's trucks blocking the alley behind her business. She lives above her business and wanted to make sure she could get her car out onto Lorton. I spoke with Sam Johnson,the manager at Round Table,and he assured me that the trucks would not block the alley. Please let me know if you need anything further. Georgette Naylor President/CEO Burlingame Chamber of Commerce 290 California Drive Burlingame,CA 94010 650-344-1735 6/15/2004 DATE: June 8, 2004 TO: All Park Road Businesses and Businesses on the South Side of Burlingame Avenue between Primrose Road and Lorton Avenue. RE: Burlingame's Seasonal Sunday Fresh Market. The Burlingame Fresh Market is in its seventh year and has proven to be a value to our community. It is a wonderful place to run into friends and neighbors on Sunday mornings and promotes economic 7777 development and the vitality of our downtown area. It exposes residents and visitors to stores, restaurants and services offered in Burlingame. It has been said that for every dollar spent at a Farmer's Market, three dollars are spent at surrounding businesses. Many communities have started their own Farmer's Markets in their downtowns. The Fresh Market seeks to maintain our quality vendors and to integrate more closely with the core shopping area, thereby attracting more people to our downtown area. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors respectfully requests that the Fresh Market be relocated from parking lot W on Howard Avenue to Park Road starting at Burlingame Avenue. Street closure would be from Burlingame Avenue and Park Road to the beginning of the access to the public parking lot areas (see attached map). Proposed hours of market operation are 9:00 a.m. until 1 :00 p.m. each Sunday (from May to November) with street closure from 7:30 a.m. until 1 :30 p.m. The Chamber will work with Public Works to set up appropriate street closure signage. Businesses that front the proposed closed area are closed for business on Sunday For Questions or Concerns: Call 650-344-1735 Fax: 650-344-1763 Email: infor@burlingamechamber.org CITY G AGENDA 7b ITEM # BURLINGAIME MTG. STAFF REPORT �o' m DATE 6/21 /2004 O F4TEC JYNEd TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED ; BY DATE: June 16, 2004 APPRO le4e BY i FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: CONSIDER REINTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE REGARDING EMF EXPOSURES TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO DISTANCE STANDARDS RECOMMENDATION Consider reintroduction of ordinance regarding EMF exposure standards to provide an alternative of reduction in exposure as well as distance. If the Council would like to pursue this reintroduction, the Council can take the following actions: A. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 5 days before proposed adoption. DISCUSSION In May, 2004, at the request of citizens, the City Council introduced an ordinance that would set minimum distance standards between high voltage electric lines and residences, hospitals, and schools. The City has also agreed to fund a part of a consultant's evaluation of the EMF effects of the proposed Trousdale segment of the Jefferson-Martin transmission line. In reviewing the ordinance that was introduced in May, staff felt that the distance requirements did not provide a utility with any appropriate alternatives to mere distance. Construction techniques could significantly diminish EMF exposures. Therefore, this redraft proposes to add a provision that a utility could satisfy concerns by demonstrating the EMF reductions to 2 mG exposure for a residence, school, or hospital (which is in line with minimum protections recommended by the consultant who is working on this issue on behalf of the City, School District, and Hospital agencies) or by complying with a Public Utilities Commission order that accomplishes the same purpose. As the Council knows, the Administrative Law Judge has issued a recommended decision on the southern segment of the proposed transmission line that would address many of the City's concerns, and PG&E has Mayor and Council Re: Reintroduction of Ordinance on EMF Standards June 16, 2004 Page 2 indicated a willingness to develop the transmission line in accordance with that recommendation. However, the recommended decision is still subject to full Commission review and possible challenge and it does not entirely address the concerns expressed by citizens in the Skyline Corridor. Therefore, it may be appropriate to continue to discuss the parameters that an ordinance or regulatory goal such as the one proposed in May might take. Budget Impact: As discussed earlier, this ordinance process carries a great deal of financial impact that must be considered in light of the City's current financial situation. In addition, staff recommends an initial budget appropriation of$250,000 for legal fees and litigation costs to defend or enforce the ordinance. Finally, because of the possible liabilities, staff recommends an initial liability reserve of$500,000 for any possible damages. None of these expenses or liabilities would be covered by any insurance or current reserve. To fund these items, the Council could elect to take the monies from the Tier IV budget cut proposals that staff submitted in February, or to take the monies from the contingency reserve. Attachment: Redrafted Ordinance Distribution: Dennis Zell Dave Pine Wesley Skow Finance Director I ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME EMF ORDINANCE 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 6 Section 1. Findings. 7 (a)Although public utilities are generally subject to control by the Legislature pursuant 8 to Article XII, section 3 of the California Constitution, and the Legislature has plenary power 9 (so long as it is consistent with article XII)to confer authority and jurisdiction upon the Public 10 Utilities Commission pursuant to article XII, section 5 of the California Constitution, the City 11 of Burlingame retains the power under article XII, section 8 fo the California Constitution to 12 "grant franchises for public utilities or other businesses on terms,conditions,and in the manner 13 prescribed by law." 14 (b) Burlingame Ordinance No. 396, adopted May 17, 1943, which granted Pacific Gas 15 &Electric Company(PG&E)a franchise to use certain streets and other property of the City of 16 Burlingame, states in section 4, "All construction done under said franchise shall be done 17 subject to the general supervision and direction of the proper authorities of said city and in 18 compliance with all valid ordinances and regulations which are now or shall hereafter be 19 enacted and prescribed by said city under its police power." 20 (c) Although the Legislature has authorized municipal corporations to voluntarily 21 surrender some power of control over public utilities pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 22 2901,the Legislature declared in Public Utilities Code section 2902 that this authorization"shall 23 not be construed to authorize any municipal corporation to surrender to the commission its 24 powers of control to supervise and regulate the relationship between a public utility and the 25 general pubic in matters affecting the health, convenience, and safety fo the general public, 26 including matters such as the use and repair of public streets by any public utility,the locations 27 of any public streets, and the speed of common carriers operating within the limits of the 28 municipal corporation. 6/16/2004 1 (d)Government Code section 38771 states,"By ordinance the city legislative body may 2 declare what constitutes a public nuisance. 3 (e)A recent final report entitled"An Evaluation of the Possible Risks from Electric and 4 Magnetic Fields (EMFs) from Power Lines, Internal Wiring, Electrical Occupations, and 5 Appliances" (Neutra, DelPizzo & Lee) issued in June, 2002 by the California Department of 6 Health Services (requested by the California Public Utilities Commission) concluded in its 7 executive summary that it was more likely than not that "EMFs can cause some degree of 8 increased risk of childhood leukemia, adult brain cancer, Lou Gehrig's Disease, and 9 miscarriage." Many other studies also conclude that electromagnetic fields pose a health risk 10 to people, especially children. 11 (f) High voltage power lines in close proximity to schools, hospitals, and residences 12 constitute a potential human carcinogen and pose an unacceptable health risk to school children, 13 teachers, administrators, patients, health care professionals, residents, and others. 14 (g)Regardless of any actual health risk posed by electromagnetic fields,the possible risk 15 from such fields can and does adversely affect the use,enjoyment,value,and desirability of real 16 estate located in close proximity to high voltage power lines. 17 (h) The construction and maintenance of high voltage power lines on Trousdale Drive 18 and El Camino creates an undue burden upon the City of Burlingame and its residents and 19 would substantially interfere with existing public works. 20 (i)The construction and maintenance of high voltage power lines on Trousdale Drive, 21 Skyline Drive, El Camino, and elsewhere in the City within close proximity to schools, 22 hospitals, and residences would constitute a nuisance. 23 0) It is within the police power of the City of Burlingame to protect the health, safety, 24 and welfare of Burlingame citizens from the potential adverse effects of high voltage power 25 lines. 26 (k)It is within the police power of the City of Burlingame to protect public and private 27 property owners in Burlingame from the adverse economic effects of having high voltage power 28 lines in close proximity to their properties. 6/16/2004 - 2 - 1 (1)This ordinance is necessary and proper to protect the people and property of the City 2 of Burlingame under its police power, as well as the contractual authority that was expressly 3 acknowledged and agreed to by PG&E, to generally supervise and direct PG&E construction 4 in the City pursuant to section 4 of the franchise agreement adopted by Burlingame Ordinance 5 No. 396 on May 17, 1943. 6 7 Section 2. Limitations on Placement of High Voltage Power Lines. 8 (a)No new high voltage power line shall be located in close proximity to the property 9 line of any existing school, hospital, or residence in the City of Burlingame. 10 (b) For purposes of this ordinance only, "high voltage power line" shall mean a line of 11 50kV or more. 12 (c) For purposes of this ordinance only, "close proximity" shall mean within: 13 (1) 100 feet for a 50 - 133 kV line; 14 (2) 150 feet for a 220 - 230 kV line; and 15 (3) 350 feet for a 500 - 550 kV line. 16 (d) Notwithstanding subsection (a) above, a utility may place a new high voltage line 17 within close proximity of an existing school, hospital, or residence if before installation of the 18 line,the utility demonstrates to the city council at a public hearing that the high voltage line will 19 not expose any existing school,hospital or residence to more than a 2 mG electromagnetic field 20 at medium load conditions. Notice of the public hearing shall be given by the city by mailing 21 of a notice to all property owners within 300 feet of the utility line segment that is proposed to 22 be within the minimum distances set forth in this section at least ten(10)before date set for the 23 hearing. The provisions of this subsection may also be satisfied without hearing before the city 24 council if the California Public Utilities Commission has issued an order regarding the proposed 25 high voltage line that requires the utility to install the line in the city in such a way that the line 26 will not expose any existing school,hospital,or residence to more than a 2 mG electromagnetic 27 field. 28 (e)Unless exempt pursuant to subsection(b),any violation of subsection(a)above shall 6/16/2004 - 3 - I be deemed a nuisance per se and shall be enjoined without proof of the injurious nature of the 2 activity. 3 (f)Anyone who successfully brings an action to enforce the provisions of this ordinance 4 shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. 5 (g)This ordinance may be enforced by any person who lives,works,owns real property, 6 or has children attending school at a location within close proximity to a high voltage power 7 line. 8 9 Section 4. The terms of this ordinance are severable such that if any provision herein 10 is invalidated, the remaining provisions shall remain in effect. 11 12 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 13 14 Mayor 15 16 I,ANN T.MUSSO,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that 17 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18 day of , 2004, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council 19 held on the day of , 2004, by the following vote: 20 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 21 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 22 23 24 City Clerk 25 26 27 28 6/16/2004 -4 - C,TY STAFF REPORT WRLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 7c y�oq at MTG. DATE 6. 21 .04 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: JUNE 15.2004 APPROVE FROM: CITY PLANNER BY f � SUBJECT: INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Introduction: City Council should set the public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to amend the Bayfront Development Fee which funds public improvements in the Bayfront Specific Plan area (east of US 101). Staff would recommend that this item be set for public hearing at your meeting on July 19, 2004. Introduction requires the following council actions. A. Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan, an update of the 1981 Bayfront/Anza Area Specific Area Plan, on April 5, 2004. Like the 1981 Bayfront/Anna Plan before it, the 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan implementation program is based on a Bayfront Development Fee. However, the 2004 plan identified a new set of improvements to be funded with the fee. As a result the cost of improvements and associated fees increased. The new implementation program is based on the same public/city(60%) and private (40%) funding match that was used in the 1981 Bayfront Development Fee. A development fee must be rooted in an identified list of projects, adopted as a part of the General Plan. In this case the list can be found in the implementation chapter of the adopted 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan(page VII- 3) and includes the following projects: Airport Boulevard Bridge Reconstruction (Sanchez Creek) Airport Boulevard Widening (including bicycle lanes. transition with future Broadway interchange, new signals at Broadway interchange, as well as curb, gutter, sidewalk, undergrounding utilities, paving, median construction and landscaping) Bayshore Highway Median Reconstruction The total estimated cost for these improvements identified in the plan is $8,295,000. The base of the Bayfront Development Fee now needs to be adjusted inorder to raise 40 percent of the cost of these improvements. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA June 21,2004 The Bayfront Development fee is based on p.m. peak hour trip generation by land use. The new proposed fees are as follows: Office use $1,852 per thousand square feet Restaurant $7,458 per thousand square feet Hotel $607 per guest room Hotel, Extended Stay $590 per guest room Office/Warehouse/Manufacturing $2,808 per thousand square feet Retail-Commercial $6,818 per thousand square feet Car Rental $43,268 per acre of property in use Commercial Recreation $13,428 per acre of property in use All Other $1,492 per p.m. peak hour trip as determined by a traffic study approved by the City It should be noted that the number of land uses allowed in the 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan is greater than those allowed in the 1981 plan. The following new uses and fees for them were added: extended stay hotel, office/warehouse/manufacturing (mixed use), retail commercial, car rental, and a general category for all other uses. The 1981 Bayfront plan anticipated the construction of$2,000,000 (total cost) worth of circulation improvements, including the Anza/101 bridge, with developers responsible for 40% of the cost. The 2004 plan anticipates the construction of $8,295,000 worth of improvements. Even though the developers are responsible for only 40% of this total expenditure, the base amount for developers is greater than in 1981 so the cost per trip has increased and thus the individual fees have increased. Because the Bayfront Specific Plan will be implemented over an extended period of time, the ordinance will also provide for the indexing the Bayfront Development fee to the annual increase in the cost of living. The new fee is proposed, like the current fee, to be indexed on the construction cost index published in Engineering News Record as of July 1 st of each year. General Plan Compliance On April 5, 2004 the City Council approved the Bayfront Specific Plan and amended it to the Burlingame General Plan. At that time the Implementation Program, including the Bayfront Development Fee, its proportional distribution between the city and developers, the annual indexing and the list of improvements and their estimated cost in 2004 dollars, were also amended to the General Plan. Since the proposed fees are based on the proposals in the adopted plan, this action adopting new fees is consistent with the City of Burlingame General Plan. Environmental Review In adoption the 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan the city also adopted Negative Declaration ND-531P, on which the statute of limitations has run. This environmental document covers the impacts caused by adopting the Bayfront Development fee; however, each of the future projects to be built using the fees collected will require its own environmental review. ATTACHMENTS: 2004 Bayfront Specific Plan, Implementation Chapter, adopted April 5, 2004 Draft Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Development Fees for Public Improvements in the Bayside Specific Plan Area. U:\CCStaffRepts\CCSR2004\IntroBayfrontDevFee 6.21.04.doc Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation VII. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Specific Plans are unique planning documents. The Specific Plan lies between the broad policy of the General Plan and the regulatory specifics of zoning. The development policy of the Specific Plan is focused on the attributes and community needs of a given geographic area within a city. It is the implementation section of the Specific Plan which sets out the manner in which the proposals of the specific plan are integrated with both the General Plan and with the zoning. To make the integration of the Bayfront Specific Plan work, it must be amended to the General Plan,particularly the land use section. Because State law requires consistency between the General Plan and its implementing zoning, the existing zoning regulations and the design guidelines for the area also must be amended. Finally,the adopted plan establishes community standards for the various environmental factors which affect the planning area. The implementation required for each of these areas is addressed below. General Plan The adoption of the Bayfront Specific Plan is an amendment to the land use element of the General Plan. By adopting the Goals and Policies of the Bayfront Specific Plan,the plan will become the overlaying statement of the city's development policy for the Bayfront Area. The land use designations and densities of development set out for each subarea will become the guiding expression of planned land use densities for each subarea. These land use densities are set out by subarea within the Bayfront Planning Area in Chapter III—Bayfront Land Use Plan. Finally,the community standards for various environmental conditions will be established as if they were �.. incorporated into the General Plan. Zoning The C-4 Waterfront Commercial and O-M Office Manufacturing zoning district regulations guide the specifics of development in the Bayfront Planning Area. With the adoption of the plan these zoning district regulations will need to be amended in order to implement the directions established by the plan. For example,new land use densities will need to be established for each zoning •subarea with differing standards of performance and site development; overlay zones within areas will have to be established to facilitate the types of uses and development promoted by the planned overlay designation;in some cases regulations for new land uses,not now present in the area may need to be developed. Design Guidelines The updating of the Bayfront Specific Plan also includes the fine tuning of the design guidelines which have guided development in this area since 1981; as well as incorporating formally into the plan the jointly prepared and adopted Bay Conservation and Development(BCDC,January 1982) guidelines which address development within the first 100 feet along all of the City's water frontages which are within BCDC jurisdiction. Because of the differing character and environments of each of the Subareas within the planning area,the design guidelines have been refined by subarea(see Chapter IV—Design Guidelines). City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan V11-I General Plan Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation Compliance with the updated guidelines will be included as a conditional use in the zoning ordinance as is the case with the current Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan. The BCDC shoreline --� design guidelines are not proposed to be revised,but will be adopted as a formal part of the Bayfront Specific Plan and will continue to be a conditional use in the zoning requirements throughout the Bayfront Planning Area. The BCDC guidelines address each of the types of water frontage individually,striving for consistency of public access facilities, setbacks and building sitings by the type and importance of the individual water frontage. With adoption of the Bayfront SAP,the BCDC guidelines will be formally adopted into the city's plan and policy. Roadway and Circulation Implementation The Bayfront Specific Plan sets out a plan to provide incentives to attract development on the east side of Burlingame which will make a major contribution to the city's revenue base,will cost less for the city to provide services to than the revenue generated, and will be a destination for visitors and city residents alike. To accomplish this, the plan links the variety of land uses and their densities to the capacity of the roadway system in the area. A traffic model,the Traffic Analyzer, which is based on existing and proposed land uses and densities of development is the instrument used to determine the impact of each proposed development on the circulation system(see Appendix E for the Traffic Analyzer). A Bayfront Development Fee is charged to each development based on its measured effect on the circulation system.The funds raised are combined with city funds to make improvements to portions of the circulation system which are identified as becoming constricted due to ongoing development in the area. Thus the Traffic Analyzer becomes an incentive developers in the area by insuring that an acceptable level access to their property and investment will be maintained. On June 18, 1979 the Burlingame City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1151,Establishing Development Fees for Road Improvements. The development fees are to be paid one-half at the time of planning application for the project and one-half before final framing inspection is scheduled.When a proposed project exceeds the traffic allocation to the'site established by the proposed densities,applicants will follow a procedure requiring council review of available capacity,before making formal application and paying the first installment of the required development fee. Development fees for new land uses and changes in the present fees must be adopted by ordinance. Bayfront development fees are based on trip generation by land use. New fees will be developed and adopted based on the revised list of improvements noted above. Current fees(2004)based on the list of improvements developed with the 1981 plan are as follows: Office $1,720.00 per thousand square feet of building Restaurants $5,427.00 per thousand square feet of building Hotels $387.00 per room Office/Warehouse $984.00 per thousand square feet of building Car Rental $12,633 per acre Commercial Recreation $9,472.00 per acre City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan VII-2 General Plan Burlinzame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation The Bayfront Development Fees are indexed based on the construction cost index published in Engineering News Record as of July 1St of each year. The formula used to determine the annual index adjustment is: %change = 2002 Index—2001 Index 2001 Index The roadway and circulation enhancing projects identified as necessary to implementation of the updated plan and to be funded with the Bayfront Development Fee include the following(see Chapter IV—Traffic and Circulation for a description of these projects): Airport Boulevard curve realignment Airport Boulevard median reconstruction/site access plan Airport Boulevard bridge widening, Sanchez Channel Transition between New Broadway Interchange and Airport Boulevard Airport Boulevard Bicycle Lanes Bayshore Highway median reconstruction/site access plan Local Roadway Signalization Required with Realignment of Broadway Interchange The fee ordinance for transportation improvements is the most important part of the Bayfront SAP implementation program because the level of development proposed in the SAP is dependent on the provision of these improvements. The cost of building the roadway and circulation improvements required for plan implementation and described above(for detailed description,see Chapter IV Traffic and Circulation)has been estimated as follows: Airport Boulevard Bridge Reconstruction (Sanchez Channel) $800,000 Airport Boulevard Widening $5,445,000 (includes Bicycle Lanes, transition with the future Broadway interchange,new signals at Broadway interchange, as well as curb, gutter, sidewalk,undergrounding utilities,paving, median construction and landscaping) Bayshore Highway Median Reconstruction $2,050,000 Total Costs for Roadway Improvements $8,295,000 When the fee is updated based on the above list of projects, the Bayfront Development fee will raise only 40 percent of the required$8,295,000.00 to complete all the roadway and circulation improvements. The 40 percent is based on the present City policy of developers' contributions for projects in the Burlingame Avenue Off-Street Parking District and on the original formula established for the Bayfront fee. Phasing,Transitional Uses, and Roadway Capacity Timing Phasing: No specific time line for accomplishing the Bayfront Specific Plan is proposed. One of the particular assets of the current Bayfront Plan has been the stability of city policy and clear expectations for developers which the plan provided for two decades of rapid development and City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan V11-3 General Plan Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation expansion on the San Francisco Peninsula. This experience leads to the idea that the timing of review and update of the plan should be based on changes in the local economy,demands for new types of land uses, and other now unanticipated development pressures,not on a given time frame. _ - Transitional Uses: In 2003 much of the Bayfront Planning Area is developed.The original Bayfront Specific Plan established a planning framework which guided much of the build out of the Shoreline,Anza Extension and Anza Areas. However,much of the Inner Bayshore and some of the Anza Point Area's development occurred before the adoption of the original Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan. These areas still contain nonconforming uses and development which will take time to phase out. Several larger in-fill sites remain in the Bayfront Planning Area as well. Since the cycles of development for many of the preferred uses identified in the revised plan have become elongated in the current economic climate, it is important to make provision in the plan for transitional or interim uses. It is consistent with the goals and implementing policies of the Bayfront Specific Plan to allow lower intensity transitional or interim land uses which serve a regional need. These interim uses should comply with the underlying implementation requirements so that the planning area continues to be attractive for the preferred long-term uses identified in the plan. Such underlying implementation requirements include: traffic generation limitations, consistency with the design guidelines adopted for the subarea,.and provision of basic public access improvements along all water frontages as approved by BCDC. A use shall be determined to be transitional or interim if it is found to be compliant with the plan implementation requirements, found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the intent of the Bayfront plan and not in conflict with the long term goals and policies of the adopted Specific Plan. The transitional interim use would be allowed by a conditional use permit for a specific period of time. Transitional or interim uses should generate fewer p.m.peak hour trips than the highest number of peak hour trips from the highest trip generating land use allowed on the site so that they do not cause impacts on the circulation system beyond what was anticipated by build out of the area. Bayfront Development Fees paid by transitional or interim uses should be used at the location(s)in most need of improvement at the time the transitional or interim use is proposed. A full Bayfront Development Fee should be charged to the permanent land use at the time it is proposed for the site. Roadway Capacity Timing: Accessibility is a fundamental requirement to attract the kind of development which will support the city's revenue base. In order to provide incentive to attract the types of development projected in the Bayfront Specific PIan,it is important to insure optimum roadway and transportation access to and through the planning area. This includes access to San Francisco International Airport and to the region serving freeways and mass transit services. The Traffic Analyzer insures that land use densities and local serving roadway intersection capacity will be coordinated. However,the coordination of roadway improvements to address development in the various Subareas is also critical to maintaining accessibility. For this reason the Traffic Analyzer is based on a model of the entire area which will identify the specific locations where a proposed development will impact the system. Bayfront Development Fee expenditures shall be prioritized on the basis of relieving the most constricted roadway/intersection locations in the overall circulation system first. City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan V11-4 General Plan Burlineame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation Environmental Review Planning for the Bayfront Area of Burlingame begins with an evaluation of its environment(see Chapter VI—Development Framework and Community Standards). No place in the city is the evaluation of the environment more important in establishing a framework for development than in the Bayfront Planning Area. From the series of environmental studies used to evaluate the area,a set of community environmental standards has been established. Adopting the Bayfront SAP will add these community environmental standards to the General Plan; and they will be the bench marks for determining the impact of all future development within the Bayfront Planning Area. Review of Future Projects: Any new development proposed in the Bayfront Area will be evaluated based on the environmental benchmarks,design guidelines and density limitations contained in the plan. If a project does not comply with each and every standard established in the plan,it will require further environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Act, and may even require an amendment to the Specific Plan. The following are a summary of the benchmarks established by the Plan. o Community Standards For Wind Impacts In order to preserve the wind resource for recreational users including windsurfers and to improve the wind environment on the Bay Trail,pedestrian pathways and in useable open spaces and parking lots near large buildings, standards should be applied to evaluate changes in wind speed caused by new construction. The following standards shall be considered for all new development in the portions of the Bayfront Planning Area described below. All Areas: • The community standard to be achieved by wind evaluations required below shall be that the wind reduction caused by a structure shall reduce the wind speeds compared to existing conditions by no more than 10% at irreplaceable windsurfing launching and landing sites,or reduce wind speed by no more than 10%over large portions of the windsurfing transit routes or primary board sailing areas. • In the evaluation of wind impacts as they relate to hazardous wind conditions in the pedestrian and open space environment, the structures shall result in an increase in wind speed and turbulence in areas adjacent to the buildings of no more than 10%compared to existing conditions. • On properties along the shoreline,types of landscaping that can materially affect wind speeds should be discouraged. • In order to have a minimal impact on wind in the nearby Bay,planting of trees along the Bay trails should be minimized and guided by the impact on the wind of the trees at maturity. • Within parks and open space areas away from the water, small structures and landscaping should be used to reduce winds and provide protected areas. Shoreline Area: • For any building 80 feet tall or more, a wind analysis should be prepared to evaluate the potential wind effects on bay recreation. City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan VII-5 General Plan Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation ` • The wind analysis should also include evaluation of wind impacts as they relate to --� hazardous wind conditions in the pedestrian and open space environment adjacent to these buildings. Anza Area: • For any building 65 feet tall or higher in any area within 400 feet of the north facing shoreline,a wind analysis should be prepared to evaluate the potential wind effects on bay recreation. • The wind analysis should also include evaluation of wind impacts as they relate to hazardous wind conditions in the pedestrian and open space environment adjacent to these buildings. Anza Point Area: • For buildings 50 feet tall or higher, a wind analysis should be prepared to evaluate the potential wind effects to bay recreation. • The wind analysis should also include evaluation of wind impacts as they relate to hazardous wind conditions in the pedestrian and open space environment adjacent to these buildings. • Because the area is surrounded by water on three sides,wind considerations should take precedence over bay views in placing of buildings. Buildings should be low rise and clustered to minimize the impacts on wind speed over open water and shoreline areas. • Development should provide some sheltered passive public open spaces visually connected to the Bay Trail. -� o Community Standards for Biological Resources The only major biological constraints to development in the planning area are the jurisdictional waters of the drainages and tidelands of San Francisco Bay. The following are standards to be considered for future development in the Bayfront Planning Area: ■ Because it provides important habitat for wildlife and may be used by special-status species such as California clapper rail and saltmarsh common yellowthroat,among others,the 20- acre marshland at the west end of Burlingame Lagoon where Sanchez Creek passes under US 101 shall be preserved. ■ Given their limited extent and importance to wildlife, any disturbance or modification to the existing marshlands (Figure VI-7)throughout the planning area should be avoided. ■ Efforts should be made to restore and expand brackish and saltmarsh in suitable areas. ■ Any disturbance to potential jurisdictional waters, including the creek and drainage channels and shoreline of the bay and lagoons,would require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and could require consultation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. ■ The current use of blue gum eucalyptus in Bayside Park for seasonal nesting by raptors or communal roosting by herons and egrets should be taken into account in any future planning for the park. ■ Because there is the potential that the two vacant parcels in the Anza Area may have seasonal freshwater marsh wetlands,further detailed surveys shall be required prior to development to determine whether jurisdictional wetlands occur on these parcels. City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan VII-6 General Plan Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation ❑ Community Standards for Noise Impacts • Exterior Noise: The FAA identifies noise sensitive lands(i.e.residences, schools,parks, churches, etc.)within the 65 CNEL contour to be incompatible with aircraft noise. Land uses that are compatible within the 65 CNEL generally include commercial and industrial uses. Development of the above-noted sensitive uses should be discouraged within the adopted 65 CNEL Noise Contour for San Francisco International Airport, including the areas affected by the proposed runway expansion project and U.S. 101. • Interior Noise: Noise attenuating construction techniques shall be used for noise sensitive uses to reduce interior noise levels to acceptable standards(45 dBA). • . Land uses in the planning area shall not increase noise levels at the property line by more than 5dBA, and in proximity to residential uses, by more than 3dBA. o Community Standards for Geological Impacts In order to reduce impacts related to the geology, earthquake hazards, flooding and erosion,the following community standards should be applied to all new development: • buildings shall be placed on pile supported foundations with flexible utility connections. • hard or impervious surfaces shall be placed on a flexible base. • any new.facilities shall be installed according to the standards of the City of Burlingame Public Works Department and California Building Code Editions in effect at the time a building permit is issued. • the first floor for any proposed building shall be built at an elevation of 10 feet above mean sea level (+10' MSL), with no occupied areas below elevation 10' MSL to address the possibility of flooding. • for properties adjacent to the bay shoreline, the site shall be evaluated to determine if slope stabilization or other erosion control measures should be done to prevent future erosion of the bay edge. • In order to ensure that the public access areas adjacent to the bay edge are not subject to tidal flooding,the height of the shoreline protection structure shall be at least+8 feet MSL or as determined necessary to deter tidal flooding by the City Engineer. o Community Standard for Airport Related Height and Safety Constraints In order to ensure compliance with the FAA height and safety standards,the following community standards shall apply to any new development in the planning area. • Any new development shall be reviewed to determine compliance with the height limits shown in the San Francisco International Airport Land Use Plan ,per Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 (see Figures VI-10 and V1-11). • Any new development shall comply with the FAA standards for safety regarding flashing lights,reflective material,uses which attract a large concentration of birds, and uses which would generate electrical interference affecting aircraft communications or aircraft instrumentation. o Water Supply Any residential project proposing more than 500 dwelling units;retail project with more than 500,000 SF of floor space;commercial office building with more than 250,000 SF of floor area; City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan V11-7 General Plan Burlin arae Bayfront Specific Plan Plan Implementation industrial project with more than 650,000 SF of floor area;or any other project which would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than a 500 dwelling unit project is subject to the requirements of Senate Bill 610 and Senate Bill 221. These senate bills require a water assessment be prepared to verify that a sufficient water supply is available to meet project and cumulative demand in normal, single and multi-dry years for 20 years. ci Density Standards Any new development shall comply with the density standards outlined in Chapter 1V,Land Use. u Design Guidelines Any development proposal shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines as outlined in Chapter V,Design Guidelines. Environmental Analysis of the Plan: Because of the physical orientation of the area on the east side of US 101 in Burlingame and the varying way in which different portions of the Bayfront Planning Area are affected by environmental factors,the planning area was divided into five Subareas. Based on the uniqueness of each subarea,the Bayfront SAP evaluates the environment of the whole area,leaving the site specific analysis to each project when development is proposed. Because the environmental analysis concluded that 1)based on the fact that the land use densities generated from the traffic model caused the proposed uses to fit within the circulation system given the nine proposed circulation improvements; and 2)because when compared to the existing Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan, the overall incremental increases in environmental impact were -� the same or less; a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the update of the Bayfront Specific Plan. The Mitigated Negative Declaration includes by reference the environmental document prepared for the original Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan(adopted on May 4 1981). The Mitigated Negative Declaration analysis also addresses the changes generated by the revised plan and therefore takes precedence. Given the Mitigated Negative Declaration, all future development proposed for the area will be required to complete a project related environmental review which may require an Environmental Impact Report. City of Burlingame Bayfront Plan VII-8 General Plan 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAYSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 6 Section 1. In 1979, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1151 establishing 7 development fees for the Bayfront area of the City. Ordinance No. 1151 was subsequently 8 amended by Ordinance No. 1305 (1985) to better delineate the necessary fees. The City has 9 now adopted a new Bayfront Specific Area Plan to guide the development and improvement of 10 the Bayfront area. This ordinance is intended to update the fee schedule and to amend 11 Ordinance Nos. 1151 and 1305 to update references. 12 13 Section 2. The provisions of Ordinance No. 1151 as amended by Ordinance 1305 is 14 amended to read as follows: 15 Section 1. Statement of Intent. 16 The City Council of the City of Burlingame hereby finds and declares that it is necessary 17 to provide for future construction,Sand enlargement of major arterials and traffic 18 control devices for the primary purpose of carrying through traffic and providing a network of 19 roads within the ' PAR!, 20 0 - _-- j - -s..the City of Burlingame,and to impose charges to support and defer 21 the costs of the benefits rendered to owners and occupants of lands enjoying these 22 improvements. 23 The City Council further finds and declares that such improvements are necessary to 24 safeguard the life, health, property and public welfare of the area served, and of all persons 25 occupying the properties of the described areas. The specific improvements are described in the 26 report of the Public 27 , setting of the proposed area 28 of benefit,the boundaries of which are specifically described as all of theZ m a l 6/15/2004 I Mfg waterfront commercial and light industrial zones of the LY 2 with the exception of that areas south and east to Broadway and Rollins Road. 3 The Council further finds and declares that the contribution of the above—described 4 improvements will(1)enhance the economic value of the occupants,businesses,leaseholds and 5 landowners throughout the area byproviding for traffic safety on or near the real property in said 6 area,thereby reducing the probability of bodily injury and property damage,make aid area more 7 accessible to emergency services,such a fire and police,and enhance and promote aesthetic and 8 environmental quality on or near the occupants of the real and personal property by making 9 access to said properties quicker and more efficient. 10 It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance be enacted pursuant to the 11 City's police power for the construction of effective and safe transportation facilities as stated 12 hereinabove. 13 14 Section 2. Confirmation of Area and Costs. 15 The Bayfront Area of Benefit is hereby created having the boundaries as described 16 above. It is determined that all property within the benefit area will be benefitted by the 17 construction of the public improvements set forth in said report of the PtNic Works Dire 18 The estimated construction costs of said t�.,.__ improvements ,. � 19 of 6 e 20 ,are hereby confirmed. 21 22 Section 3. Required Participation. 23 All persons constructing new buildings or adding more than one thousand(1,000)square 24 feet of gross floor area to existing buildings within said area ofbenefit are required to participate 25 in the system of regulatory charges hereinafter set forth to insure that all of the objectives set 26 forth in Section 1 are achieved. Additions shall only require the payment for the added area 27 � , . Changes of use of existing buildings to a use requiring a 28 higher charge shall require the payment of the difference between the charges. 611512004 - 2 - I Section 4. Fees. 2 Fees are hereby established for all propertywithin the Bayfront Area of Benefit;one-half 3 o said fees shall be deposited with submittal of the project assessment f " r� � 4 p E � ' � ep .rtxr ent and the remaining one shall be paid prior 5 to the approval of final framing of buildings or additions subject to this ordinance. Any prof ect 6 which has submitted a project assessment oprior to the effective date of 7 any amendment to this ordinance but has not received a building permit, shall at the time of 8 receiving the building permit,pay any difference between the amount paid at the submittal of 9 the project assessment 6R$ Wand the amount of said fee established by such 10 amendment. Said fees shall be in the following amounts and shall be prorated for portions of 11 an acre: 12 Land Uses Eharg_e 13 Office Uses 14 $1103ffhonsand Square Feet of Bnifdin 15 Restaurant Uses4 p th© srid 9qa eau: 16 $3488ffhousand Square Feet of Building 17 Hotel Uses 6 7Ig t s p $248/per Raem 18 te�i gest r6, 19 Office Warehouse Use $630/Thousmid Square Feet of Building 20 mean AW<� � --- 21 .. ercaltltlo� " ".0 .. . 22 Car Rental Uses Ab";, 23 24 znr _ atoi $13,428/acrd© pop rtyeoted c�ooxrzner 25 hy �� r U m tie dour 26 traf"ioryppyec by City 27 Uses not identified or not reasonably within the above ef assifications shall pay stich charges as .. �� 28 �. sl W shah b 6/15/2004 -3 - 1 �#Wy the Director of Public Works,subject to an a appeal to the City Council 4 2 3 ani�e � �� _ ?� Fees shall be annually reviewed 4 and adjusted to reflect the increase or decrease in the latest Engineering News Record Highway 5 Construction Cost Index,as of July 1p . If a project does not proceed to construction 6 for reasons determined by the� � � C�reil to be beyond the control of the 7 applicant and loses its traffic allocation,the portion of the Bayfront development fee on deposit 8 with the City may be returned to the applicant. Planning and environmental fees will not be 9 returned. 10 11 Section 5. Use of Funds. 12 All charges collected pursuant to this ordinance shall be placed in a special fund to be 13 known as the Bayfront Benefit Area Fund. Payments for said fund shall be limited to costs 14 related to construction design,and right of way acquisition,and roadway and circulation fbr the 15 improvements set forth in the ' k - 16 Director of Public Woi or for the reimbursement pursuant to the agreement of a property 17 owner required to construct a portion fo said improvements, the constructions costs of which 18 exceed the charges which would otherwise be required of said developer. Additionally, said 19 funds may be used to reimburse the City for any City funds advanced for their construction or 20 developer reimbursement purposes in connection with the completion of said work if said City 21 funds exceed more than 60 percent of actual costs of the improvements. 22 23 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall take effect 24 sixty(60)days after its adoption.. 25 Mayor 26 27 I,ANN T.MUSSO,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that 28 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 611512004 -4 - I _day of , 2004, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council 2 held on the day of , 2004,by the following vote: 3 4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 5 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 6 7 8 City Clerk 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 611512004 - 5 - 6�� CITY ,. STAFF REPORT BUIRtNGAME AGENDA ITEM # 7d MTG. � �6'� DATE 6/21/04 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: 6/16/04 APPROVES FROM: Jim Nantell (558-7205) BY SuwEcr: School Crossing Guard Contract RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide staff direction relative to the issue of contracting for school crossing guards. BACKGROUND: At the previous city council meeting of June 7t' Council Member Galligan raised the issue of contracting for crossing guards. He felt that the Council should discuss whether or not the City should continue to serve as the contracting agency for the crossing guards since the City of Burlingame was not budgeting any funding for crossing guards. He indicated that contrary to what he had been led to understand in the past school districts do act as the contracting agency for crossing guards. Through his own research, which he had previously shared with the Council, he found out the San Mateo Elementary District has for many years served as the agency that secured the school crossing guards. Council Member Baylock expressed concern that throughout the school/city liaison meetings there was never any issue about the city's desire to discontinue serving as the contracting agency. During those discussions the school representatives had expressed some concerns about increased liability exposure if they were to serve as the provider of the crossing guards, therefore the group had proceeded with the understanding that the City would continue to serve as the agency that would contract for the crossing guards should the ultimate decision be to continue with paid guards. Council Member Baylock felt that it would be problematic to raise the issue at this point. At that point the Council agreed that any further discussion should be deferred until the item could be agendized for full discussion. Specifically the direction we need from the Council is: should we develop a contract between the City and the District clarifying under what conditions the City will agree to continue to contract for crossing guards services for the 2004-05 academic year. Or should we notify the district that they should plan on securing crossing guards through their own contract or some other means. EXHIBIT: Current contract for crossing guard services. AU CITY MANAGEMENTSERVICIES Amendment to Agreement between All City Management Services, Inc. and the City of Burlingame for providing School Crossing Guard Services The City of Burlingame hereinafter referred to as the "City", and All City Management Services, Inc., located at 1749 S. La Cienega Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90035, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor", mutually agree to amend the existing Agreement entered into on August 1, 1996 as follows: 1: Item #1 The City and the Contractor agree to extend the term of this Agreement for the 2003-2004 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004. -2, Item #17 The City agrees to pay Contractor for services rendered pursuant to the Agreement the sum of Thirteen Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents, ($13.29) per hour of guard service provided. It is understood that the cost of providing four-thousand, six-hundred and eighty hours(4,680) hours of service shall not exceed Sixty-Two Thousand, One-Hundred and Ninety-Seven Dollars, ($62,197.00). 3. Except as provided for in Item#1 and Item#17, all otherterms and conditions of the original Agreement and Amendments thereto between the City and the Contractor remain in effect. City of:Burlingame All City Management Services, Inc. Ile BY B Signature ar ell, General Manager Jesus Nava, Finance Director Print Name and Title Date March 28, 2003 Date_ March 18. 2003 FROM BURL I NGAME POLICE DEPT. (MON) 2. 24' 03 1 2: 1 0/ST. 1 2-.09/NO. 4862744421 P 2 1%U/ i ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. AGREEMENT BETW � ��JRLINGAME AND ALL CITY M S, INC. FOR CRC1� RVICES THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this August 1,1996 , by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the"City", and ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., hereinafter called the "Contractor"; W-TDESS€TH The parties hereto have mutually covenanted and agreed as follows: 4� 1. This Agreement is for a period of time which commences S ber 1,1996, and ends on OVgqst 31, 1997 and for such term thereafter as the parties may agree upon. ef 2. The Contractor is an independoc.t corftcW.and the guards to be fumished by it shall at all times be its employees and not those of the City. 3. The City's representative in deoft with tkie contractor shall be the Chief of Police or any such person as the City Manager may.designate. 4. If at any time during the contracg.:podej ,tity questions the meaning of any item of this Agreement, the City may corAW the CorArWor for interpretation of that item. 5. The City shall have the right toi'o urs and locations when and where : ... . .;_ guards shall be furnished by that = '`' _r, -the contractor shall notify the City in writing of any changes which may meed o=tr in hours of work or locations. The City further has the power to add to, delete from, or revise the work schedulellocations at any time. 6. The Contractor shall provide supw, I$q s rineI to see that guard activities are taking place at the required places a-nd# , and in accordance with all items of this Agreement. 7. The Contractor shall maintain adequate reserve personnel to be able to furnish altemate guards in the event that any person fails to report for work at the assigned time and location. FROM BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT. (MON) 2. 24' 03 12:10/ST. 12:09/NO. 4862744421 P 3 1' 40 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 8. The Contractor shall providepQ trained as herein specified for the performance of duties of Cr oh the performance of their duties the Contractor and employees of.%.* CaM ctor shall conduct themselves in accordance with the conditions of ft'Agrid'Ment and the laws and codes of the State of California and the City of Burlingame, 9. The Contractor shall train, schedule, provide, and supervise personnel in accordance with the contract and the rules and regulations of the City of Burlingame. Crossing Guards shall perform their duties as trained and within the City's rules for such guards. 10. Persons provided by the Cont€ r fi� Crying Guards shall be trained in the laws and codes of the State of Califomla'�d the City of Burlingame pertaining to general pedestrian safety and school crossing areas. 11. Crossing Guard Services shall be provWed=by the Contractor at the designated locations and at the designated ho urs on all days on which the designated schools in the City of Burlingame, are in session. Contractor agrees to rehire all the current Crossing Guards at the wage rate of Eight Dollars($8.00) per hour. 12. The Contractor shall provide all'Crmincg Guards-with apparel by which they are readily visible and easily recognized as Cing Guards. Such apparel shall be uniform for all persons performinglt dud W of Crossing Guards and shall be worn at all times while performing wid duties. This apparel must be appropriate for weather conditions. The Contras shall also provide all Crossing Guards with hand held Stop signs and any other s y equipment which may be necessary. Apparel and equipment shall be pre4pprcwed by the City Manager or the designate_ 13. The Contractor shall at all times_ ay' ,:I `compensation insurance covering its employees, and shall provide'# '� _ i4ty insurance for Crossing Guard activities. The Contractor will provide to the City a Certificate of Insurance naming them as an additional insured- 84h inSumnce shall include commercial general liability with a combined single rff Of not k than $5,000,000.00 per occurrence and in aggregate for property da tri `tly injury. Such insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurp—r-W-01--nmk4aftied by the City and shall not call on the City's insurance contributions. Such insurance shell be endorsed for contractual liability and personal injury and shall include the City, its officers, agents and interest of the City. Such insurance shall not be cancelled, reduced in coverage or limits or non-renewed except after thirty (30) days written notice by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested has been given to the City Manager, or designate for the City of Burlingame. FROM BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT. (MON) 2. 24' 03 12:11/ST. 12:O9/NO. 4862744421 P 4 %ftw , j ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 14. Contrector agrees to indemnify . ,r we employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of from, any and all actions, claims damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision or other organization arising out of the negligent acts or intentional tortious acts, errors, or omissions of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitee, provided for herein. a) Contractor will defend any,40on or.acbons filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, �"tles, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses including attorney's fees incurred in connection herewith. b} Contractor will promptly pay .any judgement rendered against City, its officers, agents or ernpto*s for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities. c) In the event City, its offers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other clairrrs arising out of or in connection with the sole negligence of Contractor hereunder, Contractor agrees to pay City, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all coats and expenses incurred by City, its officers agents or employ-in such action or proceeding, including, but not limited to, reasonable attomes fees. 15. Either party shall have the right to cancel this Agreement by giving thirty(30) days written notice to the other. 16. The Contractor shall not have the-:n to assign this Contract to any other person or firm except with the consent Qf re.(�'ty. 17. The City agrees to pay theCo_ ' ices rendered pursuant to this Agreement the sum of Ten Doll_ `` Ot"JIMPI -Tvne Cents($10.79) per guard, per hour for the first year of service. It.Is ttn0e*ood and agreed that the cost for providing four-thousand three-hundred(4,30Q) hours of service shall not exceed Forty-Six Thousand Three-Hunched and Ninety-Seven($46,397) Dollars per annum. FROM BURLINGAME.POLICE DEPT. (MON) 2. 24' 03 12:11/ST. 12:09/NO. 4862744421 P 5 • ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 18. In the ®vent that this Agreemerd,Wp wided beyond August 31, 1997 any hourly rate increase proposed by the Coli or not exceed 5% of the current hourly rate. The compensation for services beyond August 31, 1997 shall be established by mutual consent of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. CITYW LINvAM>=: :19 in Wfioration Attest by: � .�'�` ?4 CITY MERK ALL NAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. ; zr =9 WR yell, Manager I - CITY AGENDA 7e °•o ITEM# BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. c DATE May 17 2004 <a TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT, D ' BY W �A14 DATE: June 15, 2004 APP�O FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to Library Board RECOMMENDATION: Consider appointment recommendations of interview committee and make appointments, or take other action. BACKGROUND: Two board positions are due for appointment because of term expiration. The positions were advertised and nine applications were received. The interview committee will interview the applicants on June 18, 2004 and will then make a recommendation at the Council meeting on June 21, 2004. The terms will be for three years each, ending in June 2007. BURLINGAME Agenda STAFF REPORT Item# 8a Date Date 6/21/04 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED /L.Jow BY: DATE: June 3, 2004 APPROVED BY: FROM: PUBLIC WORKS / SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BURLINGHOME/EASTON SUBDIVISION NOS. 5 AND 7 MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 80770- PHASE I RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Burlinghome/Easton Subdivision Nos. 5 and 7 Main Replacement Project in the amount of$2,456,760.84. BACKGROUND: On 7 July 2003, City Council authorized a contract in the amount of$1,908,762 with Shaw Pipeline for the construction of the Phase I Main Replacement Project. Due to favorable bid prices relative to the engineer's estimate, Council approved an additional $400,000 construction budget for Shaw Pipeline to extend the limits to benefit additional properties (Change Order Nos. 1, 2 and 6). DISCUSSION: The project construction is completed and the final construction cost is $2,456,760.84. Given the very difficult nature of the project, which involved installation of new service laterals at almost 300 homes and close coordination with each homeowner, staff believes that the project has been constructed satisfactorily and in compliance with the project plans and specifications. The work included only$52,681in additional change orders which represents approximately 2% of the total $2,456,760.84 construction cost(Change Order Nos. 3, 4 and 5). The change orders included removal of unforeseen existing utilities, additional pavement slurry seal, and miscellaneous repairs to pipes as well as curbs and gutters. EXHIBITS: Resolution; Final Progress Payment BUDGET IMPACT: Staff Administration $38,400 Engineering Design $607,917 Construction Management $340,410 Construction $2,456,761 Total project cost $3,443,488 There is $3,589,000 in the 2002-03 CIP budget to cover these costs. cc: City Clerk, Erler& Kalinowski, Inc., Shaw Pipeline, The Culver Group S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80770-I completion-acceptance.doc RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - BURLINGHOME-EASTON SUBDIVISION NOS. 5 AND 7 MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT, PHASE 1 BY SHAW PIPELINE CITY PROJECT NO. 80770 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by SHAW PIPELINE under the terms of its contract with the City dated JULY 7, 2003, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 80770. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, Ann T. Musso, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd _ ha Pipeline Inc. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR STATE LICENSE#590638 MONTHLY PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST BURLINGHOME-EASTON WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT-PHASE I CITY OF BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA Attention: Jim Kelly,Project Manager Phone: 650.558.7239 Date: 5111/2004 City of Burlingame Fax: 650.685.9310 Sheet 1 of 8 501 Primrose Road,Burlingame,CA 94010 cc: Yev Philipovitch,Project Manager Phone: 925.556.6252 Pay Request No.: 244-09 The Culver Group Fax: 925.556.3364 City Project No.: 80770 6850 Regional,Ste.210,Dublin,CA 94568 Contractor. Shaw Pipelines,Inc. Phone: 415.337.0190 Original Contract Amount: $ 1,908,762.00 5244 Mission St, Fax: 415.337.6245 COs Approved to Date: $ 601,012.34 San Francisco,CA 94112 Adjust Final Quantities: $ (53,013.50) Project Budinghome-Easton Watermain-Phase I Revised Total Contract $ 2,456,760.84 The following estimated quantities of work have been completed as of. FINAL SUMMARY Contract Earned Earned Section Description Price This Period To Date A Original Contract Bid Items $ 1,908,762.00 $ 1,075.00 $ 1,874,242.50 Budinghome Easton Water Main Replacement Contract Change Order No.1 B Water main Repleacement and Service Connections between Hillside Drive and $ 368,432.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 359,728.00 Easton Drive and the odd-side of the 1300 block of De Soto Avenue C Contract Change Order No.2 $ 139,990.00 $ $ 130,200.00 Vancouver AvelRooseveft Ave Water Main Replacement D Contract Change Order No.3 $ 14,431.00 $ $ 14,431.00 DEWR#02.111203 and DEWR#01.111903 E Contract Change Order No.4 $ 26,250.00 $ Additional Slurry Seal $ 26,250.00 F Contract Change Order No.5 $ 12,000.00 $ $ 12,000.00 Remove and Reconstruct Disintegrated Concrete Curbs G Contract Change Order No.6 Remove and DEWR No.s 3-20 $ 39 909.34 $ 39,909.34 $ X9,909.34 GRAND TOTAL ALL SECTIONS: $ 52,084.34 $ 2,456,76D.84 THIS PERIOD TO DATE Total: $ 52,084.34 $ 2,456,760.84 According to the best of my knowledge and belief,I hereby Less 5%Retention: $ 2,604.22 $ 122,838.04 certify that all the items and amounts shown on this Monthly - Progress Payment Request are correct and that no part of Net $ 49,480.12 _ $ 2,333,922.80 the"Payment Due"has been received to date. Less Previous Payments: $ - $ 2,114,063.03 PAYMENT DUE: $ 49,480.12 219 859.77 Cor*dci r`Signature ` Date 5244 MISSION STREET - SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94112 PHONE (415) 337-0190 - FAX (415) 337-6245 E-mail: ShawPipeline@aol.com Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Date: 5111(2004 Page: 2 of 8 Original Bid items•SECTION A. Estimated Quantities Bid Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1 4"PVC Water Main 50.0 LF $ 100.00 $ -0.0 2 6'PVC Water Main 2800.0 LF $ 80.00 $ 224,000.00 2770.0 0.0 $ 2770.0 $ 221,600.00 3 8"PVC Water Main 1300.0 LF $ 82.00 $ 106,500.00 1310.0 0.0 $ J4035.O 107,420.00 4 10"PVC Water Main 2100.0 LF $ 90.00 $ 189,000.00 2100.0 0.0 $ 189,000.00 5 12'PVC Water Main 2700.0 LF $ 95.00 $ 256,500.00 2700.0 0.0 $ 256,500.00 . 6 16"PVC Water Main 4050.0 LF $ 110.00 $ 445,500.00 4035.0 0.0 $ 443,850.00 Pipe Profile Adjustment 6'PVC,8'PVC,10- 7 PVC,Greater Than 0.5'and Less Than or 350.0 LF $ 6.00 $ 2,100.00 50.0 0.0 $ 50.0 $ 300.00 Equal To 2.5' Pipe Profile Adjustment 6"PVC,8-PVC,10' 8 PVC,Greater Than 2.5'and Less Than or 160.0 LF $ 10.00 $ 1,600.00 0.0 0.0 $ p,p $ Equal To 5' Pipe Profile Adjustment 12"PVC,16"PVC, 9 Greater Than 0.5'and Less Than or Equal To 340.0 LF $ 7.50 $ 2,550.00 355.0 0.0 $ 355.0 $ 2,662.50 25' Pipe Profile Adjustment 12'PVC,16'PVC, 10 Greater Than 2.5'and Less Than or Equal To 160.0 LF $ 15.00 $ 2,400.00 0.0 O.D $ 0.0 $ 5' 11 4'Elbow Fitting 6.0 EA $ 50.00 $ 300.00 0.0 0.0 $ p p $ 12 6"X 6"Cross Connection 1.0 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 1.000 $ 1.D 13 6"X 6'X Varies Tee Connection $ 250.00 3.0 EA $ 150.00 $ 450.00 3.0 .0.0 $ 3.0 $ 45D.00 14 6'Elbow Fitting 16.0 EA $ 125.00 $ 2,000.00 4.0 0.0 $ 4.0 15 8"X 8"X Varies Tee Connection 3.0 675.00 EA $ 225.00 $ 675.00 3.0 0.0 $ 3A $ 500.00 $ 16 8'Elbow Fitting 13.0 EA $ 150.00 $ 1,950.00 11.0 0.0 $ 11.0 $ 11650.00 17 10'X 10"X Cross Connection 1.0 EA $ 750.00 $ 750.00 20 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 1,500.00 18 10'X 10'X Varies Tee Connection 3.0 EA $ 350.00 $ 1,050.00 5.0 0.0 $ 5.0 $ 1,750.00 19 10'Elbow Fitting 4.0 EA $ 175.00 $ 700.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 20 12'X 6"X Cross Connection 4.0 EA $ 850.00 $ 3,400,00 4.0 0.0 $ 4.D 21 12'X 10'X Cross Connection $ 3,400.00 1.0 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 1:0 0.0 $ - 1.0 $ 900.00 2212'X 12'X Varies Tee Connection 3.0 EA $ 950.00 $ 2,850.00 3.0 0.0 $ 3.0 $ 2,850.00 23 12'Elbow Fitting 14.0 EA $ 225.00 $ 3,150.00 11.0 0,0 $ 11.0 $ 2,475.00 24 16'X 16'X 16'Tee Connection 1.0 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 25 16'Elbow Fitting $ 1,000.00 17.0 EA $ 456.00 $ 7,650.00 17.0 0.0 $ 17.0 $ 7,650.00 26 16'X 12'Reducer 3 0 EA $ 750.00 $ 2,250.00 3.0 0.0 $ 3.0 $ 2,250.00 27 12'X 10"Reducer 1.0 EA $ 125.00 $ 125.00 20 o.0 $ - 20 28 12'X 8'Reducer . $ 250.00 5.0 EA $ 125.00 $ 625.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 125.00 29 112"X 6"Reducer 1.0 EA $ 120.00 $ 120.00 0.0 0.0 $ p p $ 30 10'x 8'Reducer 2.0 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 1.0 0.0 $ - 1.0 $ 100.00 31 10'X 6'Reducer 1.0 EA $ 100.00 $ 100.00 1.0 D.0 $ 1.0 $ 100.00 32 8"X 6'Reducer 2.0 EA $ 75.00 $ 150.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 450.00 33 6"X 4"Reducer 2:0 EA $ 75.00 $ 150.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 34 3'Cap 1.0 EA $ 12.00 $ 12.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 35 6'Cap 5.0 EA $ 35.00 $ 175.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 70.00 36 8"Cap 2.0 EA 13 40.00 $ 80.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 80.00 37 14'Cap 1.0 EA 100.00 0.0 Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Date: 5/11/2004 Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Page: 3 of 8 Original Bid items-SECTION A- Continued Bid Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Eamed To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 38 2"Gate Valve 1.0 EA $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 39 4"Gate Valve 2.0 EA $ 400.00 $ 800.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 800.D0 40 6'Gate Valve 21.0 EA $ 450.00 $ 9,450.00 21.0 0.0 $ 21.0 $ 9,450.00 41 8"Gate Valve 8.0 EA $ 600.00 $ 4,800.00 8.0 0.0 $ 8.0 $ 4,800.00 42 10'Butterfly Valve 11.0 EA $ 800.00 $ 8,800.00 16.0 0.0 $ 16.0 $ 12 80000 43 12"Butterfly Valve 10.0 EA $ 850.00 $ 8,500.00 10.0 O.D $ 10.0 $ 8,500.00 44 16"Butterfly Valve 5.0 EA $ 1,850.00 $ 9,250.00 5.0 0.0 $ 5.0 $ 9,250.00 45 Fire Hydrant Assembly 15.0 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 37,500.00 19.0 0.0 $ 19.0 $ 47,500.00 46 1'Service Connection: Short(less or equal to 15) 60.0 EA $ 750.00 $ 45,000.00 90.0 0.0 $ 90.0 $ 67,500.00 47 1"Service Connection: Medium(greater than 15'and less than or equal to 25) 86.0 EA $ 850.00 $ 73,100.00 77.0 0.0 $ 77,0 $ 65,450.00 48 1"Service Connection: Long(greater than 25') 44.0 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 44,000.00 30.0 0.0 $ 30.0 $ 30,000.00 49 2•15'and less than or equal to 25')Service Connection:Medium(greater than 5 0 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 61000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 1,200.00 50 Air Relief Valve 6.0 EA $ 550.00 $ 3,300.00 6.0 0.0 $ 6.0 $ 3,300.00 51 1'Blowoff 15.0 EA $ 275.00 $ 4,125.00 45.0 0.0 $ - 45.0 $ 12,375.00 52 2'Blowoff 48.0 EA $ 400.00 $ 19,200.00 13.0 0.0 $ 13.0 $ 5,200.00 53 Pressure Reducing Valve Station at Carryon from EI Quinito 1.0 EA $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 1.0 0.0 $ - 1.0 $ 8,500.00 54 Pressure Reducing Valve Station at Summit 1 D EA' $ 25,000.00 $ and Canyon 25,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 25,000.00 55 Pressure Reducing Valve Station at Adeline and Alvarado 1.0 EA $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 40,000.00 56 Slurry seal(Alvarado Ave.,Columbus Ave., and Easton Dr.) 56500.0 SF $ 0.25 $ 14,125.00 56500.0 0.0 $ 56500.0 $ 14,125.00 57 Remove and Salvage Fire Hydrant 12.0 EA $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00 3.0 9.0 $ 900.00 120 $ 1,200,00 58 1114"Service Line Connection(Trenchless) 200.0 LF $ 21.00 $ 4,200.00 310.0 0.0 $ - 310.0 $ 6,510.00 59 1'Service Line Connection(Trenchless) 3200.0 j LF $ 20.00 $ 64,000.00 5398.0 0.0 $ 5398.0 $ 107,960.00 60 1'Service Lfne Connection(Cut and Cover) 2270.0 LF $ 10.00 $ 22,700.00 100.0 0.0 $ 100.0 $ 1,000.00 61 1114'Service Line Under House 200.0 LF $ 5.50 $ 1,100.00 0.0 0.0 $ - 0.0 $ - 62 1'Service Line Connection Under House 1900.0 LF 1$ 5.00 $ 9,500.00 1900.0 0.0 $ - 1900.0 $ 9,500.00 63 314"Service Line Connection Under House 1650.0 LF $ 5.00 $ 8,250.00 882.0 35.0 $ 175.00 917.0 $ 4,585.00 64 Install Water meter Box 200.0 EA $ 50.00 $ 10,000.00' 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ 9,900.00 65 Install City-furnished Water Meter .EA $ 10.00 $ 2,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 66 Remove and Dispose Existing Water Meter 198.0 $ 1,980.00 Box 200.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 2,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ 1,980.00 67 Remove and Salvage Existing Water Meter 200.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 2,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ =1,980.00 68 Electrical Grounding Rod 200.0 EA $ 300.00 $ 60,000.00 63.0 0.0 $ 63.0 $ 18,900.00 69 Cap-off Existing Service Line 116.0 EA $ 25.00 $ 2,900.00 116.0 0.0 $ 116.0 $ 2,900.00 70 Furnish and Install Pressure Regulator 200.0 EA $ 175.00 $ 35,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ 34,650.00 71 Furnish and Install Shut-off Valve 200.0 EA $ 15.00 $ 3,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ 2,970.00 Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Date: 511112004 Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Page: 4 of 8 Original Bid hems-SECTION A-Continued Bid Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 72 Furnish and Install Hose Bib 200.0 EA $ 15.00 $ 3,000.00 198.0 0.0 $ 198.0 $ 2,970.00 73 Traffic Control 1.0 LS $ 10,000.00 5 10,000.00 1.00 0.00 $ 1.0 $ 10,000.00 74 Mobilization 1.0 LS $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 40,000.00 SECTION A SUBTOTAL.ORIGINAL BID ITEMS: Is 1,908,762.00 $ 1,075.00 $ 1,874,242.50 Contract Change Order No.1-SECTION B-Estimated Quantities CC01 Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1 6"PVC Water Main 1300.0 LF $ 80.00 $ 104,000.00 1300.0 0.0 $ 1300.0 $ 104,000.00 2 8'PVC Water Main 750.0 LF $ 82.00 $ 61,500.00 750.0 0.0 $ 750.0 $ 61,500.00 3 8'x 8'X 6'Reducing Tee 2.0 EA $ 225.00 $ 450.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 450.00 4 8'90 Degree Fitting 1.0 EA $ 150.00 $ 150.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 150.00 5 8'22.5 Degree Frtdng 2.0 EA $ 150.00 $ 300.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 300.00 6 6"45 Degree Fitting 1.0 EA $ 125.00 $ 125.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 250.00 7 6'Gate Valve 1.0 Fes, $ 450.00 $ 450.00 4.0 0.0 $ 4.0 $ 1,800.00 8 8'Gate Valve 4.0 EA $ 600.00 $ 2,400.00 4.0 0.0 $ 4.0 $ 2,400.00 9 Fire Hydrant Assembly 2.0 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 2.0 0.0 $ 20 $ 5,OOD.00 10 1'ServiceConnection: Short 39.0 EA $ 750.00 $ 29,250.00 40.0 0.0 $ 40.0 $ 30,000.00 (less than or equal to 15') 11 V Service Connection:Long 58.D EA $ 850.00 $ 49,300.00 58.0 0.0 $ 58.0 $ 49,300.00 (greater than 15,less than or equal to 25') 12 Air Relief Valve 1.0 EA $ 550.00 $ 550.00 5.1) 0.0 $ 5.0 $ 2,750.00 13 V Blowoff 4.0 EA $ 275.00 $ 1,100.00 7.0 0.0 $ 7.0 $ 1,925.00 14 1114'Service Line Connection(Trenchless) 243.0 LF $ 21.00 $ 5,103.00 153.0 O.D $ 153.0 $ 3,213.00 15 1"Service Line Connection 1590.0 LF $ 20.00 $ 31,800.00 2166.0 0.0 $ 2166.0 $ 43,320.00 (frenchless) 16 V Service Line Connection 480.0 LF $ 10.00 $ 4,800.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ - (Cut and Cover) 11/4"Service Line under the house including 17 penetration,fittings,and connection to existing 188.0 LF $ 5.50 $ 1,034.00 190.0 0.0 $ 190.0 $ 1,045.00 line 1"Service line under the House including 18 penetration,fittings,and connection to existing 405.0 LF $ 5.00 $ 2,025.00 209.0 0.0 $ 209.0 $ 1,045.00 line 314"Service Line under the House including 19 penetration,fittings,and connection to existing 1214.0 LF $ 5.00 $ 6,070.00 1300.0 0.0 $ 1300.0 $ 6,500.00 line 20 finstall Water Meter Box 100.0 EA $ 50.00 $ 5,000.00 98.0 OA $ 98.0 $ 4,900.00 21 Install City-fumished Water meter 100.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 1,000.00 9B.0 0.0 $ 98.0 _=580.00 22 Remove and Dispose Existing Water Meter Box 100.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 1,000.110 96.0 0.0 $ 98.0 $ 980.00 23 Remove and Salvage Existing Water Meter 100.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 1,000.00 98.0 0.0 $ 98.0 $ 980.00 Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Date: 5111/2004 Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Page: 5 of 8 Contract Change Order No.1-SECTION B-Continued CCO1 Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 24 Electrical Grounding Rod 100.0 EA $ 300.00 $ 30,000.00 4.0 37.0 T 11,100.00 41.0 $ 12,300.00 25 Cap-off Existing Service Line 61.0 EA $ 25.00 $ 1,525.00 62.0 0.0 $ 62.0 $ 1,550.00 26 Furnish and Install 1'Pressure Regulator 100.0 EA $ 175.00 $ 17,500.00 98.0 0.0 $ 98.0 $ 17,150.00 E29TrFurnish and Install 1EA'Shut-off Valve including 100.0 $ 15.00 $ 1,500.00 98.0 0.0 $ 98.0 $ 1,470.00 pipe transition affic Furnish and Install Hose Bib 100.0 EA $ 15.00 $ 1,500.00 98.0 0.0 $ 98.0 $ 1,470.00 Control 1.0 LF $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 3,000.00 SECTION B SUBTOTAL-CHANGE ORDER NO,1: $ 368,432.00 $ 11,100.00 S 359,728.00 Contract Change Order No.2-SECTION C-Estimated Quantities CCO2 Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1 4"PVC Water Main 60.0 LF $ 100.00 $ 6,000.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ _ 2 6'PVC Water Main 1070.0 LF $ 80.00 $ 85,600.00 1107.0 0.0 $ 1107.0 $ 88,560.00 3 8"PVC Water Main 0.0 LF 3 82.00 3 - 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 $ _ a 10"PVC Wale,L:1a:n 0.0 1 LF 90.00 3 0.0 0.G' 0.0 Is - 5 12'PVC Water Main 20.0 LF $ 95.00 $ 1,900.00 5.0 0.0 $ 5.0 Is 475.00 16'PVC Water(.lain 0.0 LF 110.00 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ Pipe Profile Adjustment:F PVC,8"PVC.10" PVC,greater than G.5'eno fess than ar aqua! 0.0 LF 6.00 :i 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ io 2.5'be!o•:,standard depth Pipe Profile Adjustment:6"PVC.8"PVC.10" 8 PVC,greater than 25'and!=ss than cr equal 0.0 LF 10.00 i 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ to 5'belova standard depth Pipe Profile Adjustment:12"PVC,16`PVC, 9 Greater than 0.5'and less than or equal to 2.5' 0.0 LF z 7.50 3 0,0 0.0 0.0 $ telow standar;,j-a ,, Pipe Profile.Adjustment:1='PVC.16"PVC. 10 Greater than 2.5'and less than or equal to 5' 0.0 LF 15.00 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 $ below standard depth 11 4'-45 Elbow Fitting 0.0 EA $ 50.00 $ D.0 0.0 $ 0.0 1$ 12 6'x 6"Cross Connection 0.0 EA $ 250.OD $ 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 1$ _ 13 6"x 6'x Varies Tee Connection 2.0 EA $ 150.00 $ 300.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 300.00 14 6"Elbow Fitting 6.0 EA $ 125.00 $ 750.00 4.0 0.0 $ 4.0 $ 500.00 15 6"x 8".K Varies Tee Connection 0.0 225.00 S - 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ _ 10 8"Elbow Fining 0.0 EA ; 150.00 3 0.0 9.0 0.0 $ 17 10"x 10"Cross Connect on 0.0 =A 750.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 18 10"x 10"x Varies Tee Connection 0.0 = ; 350.00 3 0.0 O.0 0.0 $ 19 10"Elbow Fiftinq 0.0 EA 175.00 i O.0 0.0 0.0 $ 20 12"x 6'Cress Ccnnectien O.G Er. 850.GG 3 0 0 0.12 0.0 21 12"x 10"Cross Connection 0 - a 0.� �A. 3 00.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 22 12'x 12'x Varies Tee Connection 2.0 EA $ 950.00 $ 1,900.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 950.00 23 12'Elbow Fitting 1.0 EA $ 225.00 $ 225.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ - _'� 16"x 16"x 16"Tee COnncgiOri O.Q - 1.000,CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Date: 21612004 Page: 6 of 8 Contract Change Order No.2.SECTION C-Continued CCO1 Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Eamed Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 25 16"Elbow Fixing O.0 EA. -S4 5 0.0 0 0.0 QG S 0.0 $ R:dtL]cr 0.0 E:; S 750.00 3 Q 0.0 0.0 $ 27 12"x 10'Reducer 0.0 E: -S125.00 3 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 20 12"x 8•Reducer 0.0 EA S 125.00 5 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 29 i2"x 6"Reducer 0.0 EA 5 120.00 S 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 30 IC'x 8'Reducer 0.0 =. S 1Gv".00 S 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 $ 31 10'x 6"Reducer 0.0 =` S 100.00 S 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 32 63"x 6"Reducer 0.0 EA S 75.00s 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 33 6'x 4'Reducer 1.0 EA $ 75.00 $ 75.00 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ .:20 0.0 1 =EA 3 12.00 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 35 6'Cap 2.0 EA $ 35.00 $ 70.00 1.0 0.0 1 $ - 1.0 $ 35.00 36 8"Cap 0.0 EA. 5 40.00 S -- 0.0 0A - 0.0 $ - `^''••1r li cA J 100.00 J - 0.0 6.0 - 0.0 $ 38 Cl Gate Valve 0.0 EA S 50.00 5 0.0 0.0 S 0-0 $ _ 39 4"Cl Gate Valve 0.0 EA, S 400.00 S 0.0 0.0 T-. O,p $ 40 6'Cl Gate Valve 8.0 EA $ 450.00 $ 3,600.00 8.0 0.0 $ - 8.0 $ 31600.00 11 £"Cl Gate Valve 0.0 EA 3 600.00 S 0.0 0.0p,p $ 42 10`Cl 9uttenly Valve 0.0 A. S 800.00 3 QC 0.0 3 0.0 $ 43 12'Cl Butterfly Valve 1.0 EA $ 850.00 $ 850.00 1,0--0.0- $ - 1.0 $ 850.00 44 16"Cl Butterfly Valve 0.0 EA. S 1,850.00 S 0.0 0.0 a 0,0 $ 45 Fffe Hydrant Install 2.0 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 2,500.00 46 1'Service Connection: Short(less than or equal to 15') 18.0 EA $ 750.00 $ 13,500.00 18.0 0.0 $ 18.0 $ 13,500.00 47 ServiceConnection: Medium(greaterthan IIS and less thanw equal to 15� 14.0 EA $ 850.00 $ 11,900.00 14.0 0.0 $ 14.0 $ 11,900.00 1than 48 1'Service Connection: Long(greaterthan 25") 0,0 EA. S 1,000.00 3 - 0.0 0.0 5 0.0 T 49 2'Service Connection: Medium(greaterthan 15'and less than or equal to 15') 2.0 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 2.0 0.0 $ 2.0 $ 2,400.00 50 Air Relief Valve0.0 EA $ 550.00 $ - 0.0 D.0 $ 0.0 $ 51 1'Blowoff 8.0 EA $ 275.00 $ 2,200.00 6.0 0.0 $ 6.0 $ 1,650.00 52 2'Blowoff 2.0 EA $ 400.00 $ 800.00 1.0 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 400.00 3 PressureReducing Valve System at Canyon mm E!Guinito 0.0 _S 3 6,500.00 S 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ - 54 Pressure Reducing Valve System at Summit and Canyon 0.0 LS z 25.000.00 S 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 $ Fressure Reducing Vaive System at Adeline and Alvarado 0.0 LS :3 40.000.00 Q0 0.0 0.0 $ Siurry Seal 56 0.0 SF S 0:25 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ (Alvarado.Columbus.andEaston) 57 Remove and Salvage Fire Hydrant 2.0 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 2.0 0.0 $ - 2.0 - 200.00 58 1.114"Service Line Connection(Trenchless) 0.0 LF 21.00 S - 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ ^nce Line Connecvon;Trenchless; QO 20.00 0.0 0 0 0.0 $ 'Service Line Connection iCul and Coven 0.0 LF ; 10.00 ; 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ Budinghome-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Date: 5/1112004 Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Page: 7 of 8 Contract Change Order No,2-SECTION C-Continued CC01 Contrail Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1 1f'Service Line under the House including E1 aenetration,fittmg,and connection to existin., 09 0.0 $ line 1"Service line under the House including 6% penetration,fittings,and connection to existirio 0.0 LF S 5.00 5 0.0 00 5 0.0 $ 'ine 4"Service Line under the house including 53 penetration,fittings,and connection to existing 0.0 Er. S 5.00 S 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ line - 64 Install Water Meter Box 34.0 EA $ 50.00 $ 1,700.00 34.0 0.0 $ 34.0 $ 1,700.00 65 Install City-furnished Water Meter 34.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 340.00 34.0 0.0 $ 34.0 $ 340.00 66 Remove and Dispose Existing Water Meter Box 34.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 340.00 34.0 0.0 $ 34.0 $ 340.00 67 Remove and Salvage Existing Water Meter 34.0 EA $ 10.00 $ 340.00 O.D 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 63 Eiectrcal Grounding Rod 0.0 EA S 300.00 S 0.0 0.0 z0.0 $ 69 Cap-off Existing service Line 0.0 F;`. 25.00 S 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 70 Furnish and Insiall 1"Pressure Regulator C.) _ ; 175.00 S 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ 71 Furnish and Install 1"Shut-off Valve including ` pipe transition 0.0 E.A S 15.00 S 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 $ 72 Furnish and install Hose Bib 0.0 EA 15.00 S 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 $ 73 Traffic Control 0.0 LS $ 3,000.00 $ - 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 74 Mobilization 0.0 LS 1$ 20,000.00 $ - 0.0 0.0 $ 0.0 $ SECTION C SUBTOTAL-CHANGE ORDER NO.2: $ 139,990.00 ; $ 130,200.00 Contract Change Order No.3.SECTION D-Estimated Quantifies DEWR Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Eamed Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1.111903 Remove 16'Transmission Main 1.0 LS 7230.14 $ 7,230.14 1 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 7,230.14 2.111203 Stopage due to 16'Transmission Main 1.0 L S-F 7200.86 $ 7,200.86 1 0.0 $ 1.0 $ 7,200.86 SECTION D SUBTOTAL-CHANGE ORDER NO.3: $ 14,431.00 $ $ 14,431.00 Contract Change Order No.4.SECTION E-Estimated Quantities ntract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To EarnedItem# Description of Work CoQuantify Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 1 Additional Slurry Seal 105000.0 SF 0.25 $ 26,250.00 105000 0.0 $ 105000.0 $ 26250.00 SECTION E SUBTOTAL-CHANGE ORDER NO.4: $ $ $ 26,250.00 Contract Change Order No.5-SECTION F-Estimated Quantities Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earneditem# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 40 1 R and R Disintegrated Concrete Curbs 0.0 LF 30 $ 12,000.00 400 0.0 $ 400.0 $ 12,000.00 SECTION F SUBTOTAL-CHANGE ORDER NO.5: $ - $ $ 12,000.00 Burling home-Easton Water Main Replacement-Phase I Shaw Pipeline,Inc. Date: 5111/2004 Page: 8 of 8 Contract Change Order No.6.SECTION G-Estimated Quantities DEWR Contract Unit Extended Previous Current Earned To Earned Item# Description of Work Quantity Unit Price Price Estimate Estimate This Period Date To Date 3.033104 Remove 16'Transmission Main 1.0 LS $ 2,645.24 $ 2,645.24 0 1.0 $ 2,645.24 1.0 $ 2,645.24 4.040204 Cut Out Three Tees at Benito and Easton.. Vancouver and Easton 1.0 LS $ 5,076.20 $ 5,076.20 0 1.0 $ 5,076.20 1.0 $ 5,076.20 5.050904 Abandonment at Hillside and Montero 1.0 LS $ 1,003.38 $ 1,003.38 0 1.0 $ 1,003.38 1.0 $ 1,003.38 6.042804 Bonding for Addtonal Work 1.0 L5 $ 6,407.13 $ 6,407.13 0 1.0 7.050304 Remove 30 Valves at$75.00 Ea. 1.0 LS $ 2,250.00 $ 2,250.00 D 10 $ 6,407.13 1.0 $ 6,407.13 $ 2,250.00 1.0 $ 2,250.00 8.G42004 Misc.Cut-Outs and new RRV Box at Canyon Road 1.0 LS $ 2,836.15 $ 2,836.15 0 1.0 $ 2,836.15 1.0 $ 2,836.15 9.042304 Cut Out at Castillo and Hillside 1.D LS $ 1,804.82 $ 1,804.82 0 1.0 $ 1,804.82 1.0 $ 1,804.82 10.043004 Paint Existing Red Curbs Grey 1.0 LS $ 393.55 $ 393.55 0 1.0 $ 393.55 1.0 $ 393.55 11.043004 Transfer Three Services from 12'to 8' 1.0 LS $ 2,509.70 $ 2,509.70 D 1.0 $ 2,509.70 1.0 $ 2,509.70 12.043004 VauR at Adeline and Alvarado 1.0 LS $ 792.72 $ 79272 0 10 $ 792 72 10 $ 792 72 14.050304 Sod at hillside and Casf ll0 1.0 LS $ 177.94 $ 177.94 0 1.0 $ 177.94 1.0 $ 177.94 15.051004 Non-slid Coating on Vaults 1.0 LS $ 787.63 $ 787.63 0 1.0 $ 787.63 1.0 $ 787.63 16.040604 Install Drain Line @ Tank on Hillside 1.0 LS $ 3,333.59 $ 3,333.59 0 1.0 $ 3,333.59 1.0 $ 3,333.59 17.051104 Finish Pipeline at Tank,Pour Concrete Slab and Pave,Pave Alvarado and Hillside 1.0 LS $ 2,914.80 $ 2,914.80 D 1.0 $ 2,914.80 1.0 $ 2,914.80 18.051104 Drain Line and CB at Alvarado and Hillside 1.0 LS $ 3,239.13 $ 3,239.13 0 1.0 $ 3,239.13 1.0 $ 3,239.13 19.051104 Cap Leaking Hydrant on Easton 1.0 LS $ 377.61 $ 377.61 0 1.0 $ 377.61 1.0 $ 377.61 20.051104 Additional Slurry Seal 1.0 LS $ 3,359.75 $ 3,359.75 0 1.0 $ 3,359.75 1.0 $ 3,359.75 SECTION G SUBTOTAL•CHANGE ORDER-NO.6: $ 39,909.34 $ 39,909.34 $ 39,909,34 SUMMARY Contract Earned Earned Section Description Price This Period To Date A Original Contract Bid Items $ 1,908,762.00 $ 1,075.00. $ 1,874,242.50 B Contract Change Order No.1 C Contract Change Order No.2 $ 368,432.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 359,728.00 $ 139,990.00 $ - $ 130,200.00 D Contract Change Order No.3 $ 14,431.00 $ - $ 14,431.00 E Contract Change Order No.4 $ 26,250.00 $ - $ -26,250.00 F Contract Change Order No.5 $ 12,000.00 $ - $ 12,000.00 G Contract Change Order No.6 $ 39,909.34 $ 39,909.34 $ 39,909.34 GRAND TOTAL ALL SECTIONS: Is 299,774.34 $ 52,084.34 S 2,456,760.84 BURLIN SAGENDA BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT ITEM# 8b MTG. 6/21/04 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTEDAA,,V." DATE: June 7, 2004 BY , '.., -dV 6 VW -dg2o� APPROVE FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVI S AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR DESIGN OF SEISMIC RETROFIT OF MILLS TANK AND ROUTING STUDY FOR MILLS TRANSMISSION MAIN -CITY PROJECT 80950 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution for a professional services agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (K/J) in the amount of$144,664. BACKGROUND: In July 2003, Council authorized K/J to evaluate the City's aging potable water tanks and recommend any necessary improvements to ensure reliable storage for the system. K/J completed its evaluation and recommended that Mills tank be seismically retrofitted to comply with current design standards. Additionally, the recently completed water system master plan recommended that the existing transmission main that connects Mills tank to the Mills Zone be replaced to ensure sufficient flow. DISCUSSION: K/J was among seven qualified firms interviewed by the City to provide consulting services,including the design of storage tanks. The firm was selected because of their expertise and experience in evaluating, designing and managing the construction of storage tanks and other water system components. Staff has negotiated a fee of$144,664 for a scope of work, including(1) seismic design of the Mills storage tank, (2) bid document preparation for construction of the Mills tank seismic retrofit, (3) bid assistance for construction of the Mills tank seismic retrofit,(4)screening of up to six alternative routes for a redundant Mills transmission main,and(5) preparation of a routing study for the redundant Mills transmission main.Based on the complexity ofthe seismic retrofit design for the Mills storage tank and the routing study for the Mills transmission main,staff finds that the estimated fee is reasonable for the level of anticipated engineering effort. EXHIBITS: Resolution; Professional Services Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient budgeted funds available in the 2004-05 Water CIP to finance the services. c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Erler& Kalinowski, Inc. S:\A Public Works Drectory\Staff Reports\80950consultant.wpd RESOLUTION NO. - AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR DESIGN OF SEISIC RETROFIT OF MILLS TANK AND ROUTING STUDY FOR MILLS TRANSMISSION MAIN CITY PROJECT NO. 80950 RESOLVED,by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER, and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and on the behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DESIGN OF SEISMIC RETROFIT OF MILLS TANK AND PREPARATION OF ROUTING STUDY FOR MILLS TRANSMISSION MAIN CITY PROJECT NO.80950 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of ,2004,by and between the City of Burlingame,State of California,herein called the "City",and KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS, engaged in providing PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING services herein called the"Consultant". RECITALS A. The City desires to engage an Engineering Consultant to prepare plans and specifications for the Seismic Retrofit of Mills Tank. B. The City desires to engage an Engineering Consultant to prepare a routing study for the Mills Transmission Main. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW,THEREFORE,THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT A SHALL BE MADE AS PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide all services as set forth in Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement. 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes,ordinances,and regulations of governing federal,state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses,permits,qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall,at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses,permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports,information,data,and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public,and the Consultant shall not make any of the these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project,and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk,unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant Page 1 of 6 Agreement for Professional Engineering Consulting Services Design of Seismic Retrofit of Mills Tank and Preparation of Routing Study for Mills Transmission Main City Project No.80950 to be a trade secret of Consultant.Consultant may retain a copy of such confidential documents for its records. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed$144,644.00; and payment shall be based upon City approval. Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also,plans,specifications,documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review,even if only in partial or draft form. 7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three (3)years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Tom Yeager. 9. Project Management and Billings. During the course of the project and to support each and every invoice the consultant shall furnish control reports that shall include the following: (A)A narrative progress report of specific accomplishments during the reporting period,problems encountered or anticipated,plans for resolution of problems,accomplishments scheduled for the next reported period, and results of any significant activities. (B)A cost report for each task showing: 1.Current period and cumulative expenditures to date. 2.Estimated cost to complete and at completion. 3. Estimated date to complete. 4.Approved budget and approved contract amount. 5.A comparison of the estimated cost at completion with the approved budget to show any variance. Completed reports are to be submitted monthly,together with invoice submittal,unless directed otherwise by the City's project manager.The invoice shall be accompanied by a cost breakdown showing specific person and classification being billed for the period by task.Failure of consultant to submit and update plans or furnish required reports as directed shall constitute cause for suspension of payment of the invoices. Mark-up of subcontracted work shall be no more than 10 percent,and mark-up on any materials,supplies, and services shall be no more than 5 percent.There shall be no separate payments for local travel in the Bay Area, any phone service/calls,routine reproduction except for printing of final contract documents,or other support costs for consultant or subconsultant. 10. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 11. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid,and addressed to: To City: Syed Murtuza,P.E./City Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 Page 2 of 6 Agreement for Professional Engineering Consulting Services Design of Seismic Retrofit of Mills Tank and Preparation of Routing Study for Mills Transmission Main City Project No.80950 To Consultant: Tom Yeager,P.E. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 2191 East Bayshore Road, Ste 200 Palo Alto,CA 94303 Tel: (650)852-2800 To Program Manager: Matthew P.Zucca,P.E. Erler&Kalinowski,Inc. 1870 Ogden Drive Burlingame, California 94010 Tel: (650)292-9100 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 12. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant,in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed,shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s). With prior written consent,the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for,traveling to,and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation,unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. 13. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities are solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement,and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall,at the City's sole discretion,divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement,Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion,remove such person from the project. 14. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex,color,race,marital status,sexual orientation,ancestry,physical or mental disability,national origin,religion,or medical condition,unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment&Housing Act. 15. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract,General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: one million dollars($1,000,000) Page 3 of 6 Agreement for Professional Engineering Consulting Services Design of Seismic Retrofit of Mills Tank and Preparation of Routing Study for Mills Transmission Main City Project No.80950 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury,personal injury and property damage. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract,an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant shall provide to the City all certificates of insurance,with original endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant agrees that all certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. iv. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract,professional liability insurance in amounts not less than$1,000,000 which is sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. B. General Liability: i. The City,its officers,officials,employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;products and completed operations of Consultant,premises owned or used by the Consultant. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances maintained by the City,its officers, officials,employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City,its officers,officials,employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. C. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended,voided,canceled,reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty(30)days'prior written notice by certified mail,return receipt requested,has been given to the City. current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. D. In addition to these policies,Consultant shall have and maintain Workers'Compensation insurance as required by California law and shall provide evidence of such policy to the City before beginning services under this Agreement. Further,Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers'Compensation insurance for their respective employees. 16. Indemnification. The Consultant shall save,keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City its officers, agent,employees and volunteers from all damages,liabilities,penalties,costs,or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be set up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of,or in the course of performing work to the extent caused by a willful or negligent act,errors or omissions of the Consultant,or any of the Consultant's officers,employees,or agents or any subconsultant. 17. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder,nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 18. Governing Law. This Agreement,regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior or Municipal Page 4 of 6 Agreement for Professional Engineering Consulting Services Design of Seismic Retrofit of Mills Tank and Preparation of Routing Study for Mills Transmission Main City Project No.80950 Court of the County of San Mateo or Santa Clara. 19. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen(15)days written notice of termination. In the event of termination,the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans,files,documents,reports,performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination,City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement,unless such termination is made for cause,in which event,compensation,if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 20. Amendment. No modification,waiver,mutual termination,or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 21. Disputes. In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees,as well as costs not to exceed$7,500 in total. 22. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms,conditions,understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement,unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound,shall be binding on either party. Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one(1). City of Burlingame By City Manager Consultant:Kennedy/Jenks Consultants City of Burlingame Print Name Signature Title ATTEST: Approved as to form: City Clerk City Attorney Page 6 of 6 City of Burlingame Mills Tank Routing Study 9 April 2004 Scope of Services Our scope of services provides for an evaluation of the routing alternatives for the new 24" diameter water transmission line from the Mills Tank to the intersection of the Trousdale Drive and Sebastian Drive where the proposed pipeline will tie into the existing water distribution system. Initially, approximately six alternatives will be considered for the future alignment (See Exhibit 1). These alternatives are generally described as: • Cross 1-280 at Mills Tank to Vallejo Drive, proceed southeast on Vallejo Drive to Frontera Way, proceed northeast on Frontera Way to Sebastian Drive, and then proceed to Sebastian Drive and Trousdale Drive • Cross 1-280 at the Alternative Mills Tank site to Vallejo Drive, proceed southeast on Vallejo Drive to Frontera Way, proceed northeast on Frontera Way to Sebastian Drive, and then proceed to Sebastian Drive and Trousdale Drive • For the above two alternatives, another set of alternatives would be to proceed on Frontera Way to Hunt Drive, proceed southeast on Hunt Drive to Trousdale Drive and then proceed to the intersection of Sebastian Drive and Trousdale Drive • From either the Mills Tank or from the alternative Mills Tank site, proceed southeast through the lands of the SFPUC to the extension of Trousdale Drive, proceed northeast along the extension of Trousdale Drive beneath 1-280 to the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Sebastian Drive • From either the Mills Tank or from the alternative Mills Tank site, proceed southeast through the lands of the SFPUC to the extension of Trousdale Drive, proceed northeast along the extension of Trousdale Drive beneath 1-280 to the intersection of Trousdale Drive and Skyline Boulevard, proceed southeast along Skyline Boulevard to the intersection of Skyline Boulevard and Atwater Drive, proceed northeast along Atwater Drive to the intersection of Atwater Drive and Sebastian Drive, proceed to the intersection of Sebastian Drive and Trousdale Drive. These alternatives will be evaluated relative to: • Constructability issues • Traffic impact issues • Permitting issues • Conflicts with existing utilities • Other non-monetary issues pA031035024.00-burlingamel2004 additional scopetrevisedscopeWilistank routing scope040704.doc The proposed alternatives will be presented and will be discussed during the first workshop with the City. The purpose of the workshop is to help select three out of six proposed alternatives for more, detailed analysis. Detailed analysis of the three selected alternatives will be undertaken and a draft Mills Tank Routing Study prepared. A second workshop will held to discuss the alternatives presented in the draft report. The Routing Study Report will include the analysis of three selected alternatives. The analysis will include: • Detail description of each alternative including appropriate figures • Estimate of probable cost of construction including unit prices and estimated quantities for each alternative • Description of advantages and disadvantages for each alternative considered • CEQA consideration for each alternative (Note: This is not meant to include full preparation of CEQA documents, rather it is intended to be a summary of potential impacts) • Project schedule that identifies CEQA, permitting, design and construction timelines for each alternative. • Recommended alternative We propose breaking the scope of work into a total of three phases as follows: Phase 1: Initial Screening of approximately six routing alternatives Work performed, as a part of this task includes: • Merging County aerial photos with the City aerial photos in order to develop base map • Evaluating existing condition for each proposed alternatives • Investigating permit related issues for each proposed alternative • Evaluating impacts for each proposed alternative • Conducting feasibility assessment for alternate crossings of 1- 280 • Preparing layouts of proposed alternatives • Preparing for and conducting the first workshop where proposed alternatives will be presented to the City p:1031035024.00-budingame0004 addibonal scopevevisedscope'anillstank routing scope04O7O4.doc Phase 2: Preparation of the Routing Study Work performed, as a part of this task includes: • Preparing the draft report • Preparing for and conducting a workshop where selected three alternatives will be discussed • Preparing the final report Phase 3: Project Management Work performed, as a part of this task includes, but is not limited to performing the following project administrative tasks: • Setting up internal project accounting • Conduction an internal kickoff meeting • Preparing monthly invoices and project status reports • Meetings with the client other than at workshops Schedule We propose holding the initial workshop to review alternatives six weeks after receiving the notice to proceed from the City. We propose holding the second workshop to review the draft routing study 4 weeks after the initial workshop. The final routing study will be submitted two weeks after receiving formal comments from the City after the second workshop. p:1031035024.00-budingame12004 additional scopenvisedscopelmillstank routing scopeG407O4.dGc Estimate of Design Budget Kennedy/Jenks Consultants City of Burlingame Mills Tank Routing Study K/J No. 9 April 2004 TEY DB SCM FE JAH January 1,2004 Rates Principal Sr.Staff Staff Drafter Proj.Admin./ Classification: Eng./Sci. I EngJSci. EngJSci. Word. Proc. Hourly Rate: $175 j $100 $85 $90 $59 Phase 1-Project Management,Meetings Project Set-up 1 6 1 Project Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 Meetings w/client 8 8 C+CR Meetings 4 4 4 Preparation of the monthly progress reports 2 12 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 17 32 6 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $2,975 $3,200 $510 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $6,685 SUBCONSULTANTS MISC.COSTS CAD $0 Mileage $100 Other ODCs $15 Subtotal Phase 1 $6,800 Phase 2-Defining Routing Alternatives(6) Initial Field Review 4 4 4 Mapping-Merging County aerial photo with the City aerial photo 8 16 Research existing utilities 16 16 Evaluation of the existing condition for the proposed alternatives 2 12 6 Investigation for permit related issues for each alternative 16 16 Impact evaluation for each alternative 8 8 Feasibility assessment for crossing FWY 280 12 12 Preparation of layouts for each alternative 6 24 Preparation for Workshop 4 8 6 Conduct the Workshop 4 4 Internal QA/QC 4 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 18 86 54 56 6 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $3,150 $8,600 $4,590 $5,040 $354 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $21,734 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC.COSTS CAD $672 Mileage $150 Other ODCs $144 Subtotal Phase 2 $22,700 Phase 3-Preparation of the Report Cost Estimate for each selected alternative 2 6 40 Preparation of the drawings for 3 selected alternative 6 24 Description of advantages and disadvantages for each altemative 12 Preparation of the project schedules 4 12 Identification of CEQA considereations 4 12 Preparation of the draft report 40 8 16 Preparation for draft report Workshop 2 16 4 Conduct the Workshop 4 4 Preparation of the final report 4 8 6 8 Internal QA/QC 8 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 28 116 58 24 24 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $4,900 $11,600 $4,930 $2,1601 $1,416 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $25,006 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC.COSTS CAD $288 Mileage $100 Other ODCs $106 Subtotal Phase 3 $25,500 Total Hours 163 234 118 80 30 Total All Phases I $55,000 Mills Tank Routing Budget04O7O4.x1s City of Burlingame Mills Tank Seismic Improvements 9 April 2004 Scope of Work We propose developing the design of the seismic improvements to Mills Tank in the following 6 phases. • Phase 1—30%Design • Phase 2—60%Design • Phase 2—95%Design • Phase 4—Bid Documentation Preparation • Phase 5—Bid Assistance • Phase 6—Project Management Drawings and technical specifications,representative of the design developed at the end of each phase,will be submitted to the City at the end of each phase for review and comment. Once comments on the second submittal are received from the City,we will prepare and provide to the City documents suitable for soliciting construction bids. We also propose assisting the City during the bidding period.. No construction management services are included in this scope of services,they will be negotiated at a later time. Phase 1—30% Work conducted,as part of this phase will include: • Update written description of work to be performed and estimate of cost of construction • Identify design criteria and list codes to be followed • Develop sheet count of plans and outline of specifications • Preparation and submittal of three copies of 30%technical memorandum for the City's review • Attendance at a meeting to review comments on the 30%technical memorandum with the City Phase 2—60%Design Submittal Work conducted as part of this phase includes: • Development of the basic structural improvements design • Preparation of a site plan and other drawings sufficient to show the basic structural improvements p:WN35024,00 bui,game12004additonelsca V,,se0wc ,p illsOnk%ope090909.o • Preparation of Division 0 and Division 1 of the contract specifications utilizing the City's standards for Division 0 and Division 1 • Preparation of draft technical specifications • Update estimate of the probable cost of construction • Preparation and submittal of three sets of 60% Design drawings and specifications for the City's review • Attendance at a meeting to review comments on the 60% Design with the City Phase 3 — 100% Design Submittal Work conducted as part of this phase includes: • Incorporating City comments on the 60% Design submittal into the drawings and technical specifications • Completion of the structural improvements design • Completion of the drawings and specifications • Preparation of an estimate of the probable cost of construction • Preparation and submittal of three sets of 95% design drawings and specifications for the City's review • Attendance at a meeting to review comments on the 95% Design with the City Phase 4 — Bid Document Preparation Work conducted as part of this phase includes: • Incorporation of City comments on the 100% Design submittal into the drawings and technical specifications • Finalize drawings and specifications • Preparation and submittal to the City of one set of stamped reproducible plans and specifications for use in printing the contract documents for distribution to prospective bidders. Phase 5 — Bid Assistance Work conducted as part of this phase includes: • Prepare and send 7 copies of the contract documents to local contractor's plan services • Prepare and send 25 copies of the contract documents to the City of Burlingame who will distribute them to bidders and others who wish to purchase copies. • Attend a pre-bid meeting and associated site walk • Provide a maximum of 8 hours of consultation to the City regarding questions that may be raised during the bidding period • Preparation of one addendum pAOM35024.00-budingame0004 additional scope`Jevisedscopeanills tank scope040909.doc Phase 6 — Project Management Work conducted as part of this phase includes conducting various project administrative tasks such as: • Setting up internal project accounting system • Conducting an internal project kickoff meeting • Reviewing budget status • Preparing monthly billings Schedule We propose submitting the 30% technical memorandum to the City for review and comment four weeks after receiving the notice to proceed from the City. We propose submitting the 60% Design submittal to the City for review and comment six weeks after receiving and discussing with the City, the City's comments on the 30% technical memorandum. We propose submitting the 95% Design submittal to the City for review and comment six weeks after receiving, and discussing with the City, the City's comments on the 60% Design submittal. We propose submitting the Bid Documents to the City two weeks after receiving, and discussing with the City, the City's comments on the 95% Design submittal. pVI035024.00-budingame,2004 additional scopevevisedscopelrnills tank scope040909.doc Estimate of Design Budget Kennedy/Jenks Consultants City of Burlingame Mills Tank Seismic Improvements 9 Apnl 2004 TEV OLE DLB JKC SCM JAH January 1,2004 Rate. Principal j Senior Senior Enginearl Sr.Staff Proj.AdminJ Classification: Eng./Sci. Eng./Sci. E%.1,16. Scientist EngJSci. Word.Proc. Hourly Rate: $175 $163 $163 $114 $100 $59 Phase 1-30%Design Site Volt B Pre Technkm al nroorandum 16 8 Coat Ealimale - 8 Internal OA/OC 4 4 Submktal Reviaa M.0n. 4 4 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 8 38 4 0 0 8 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $1,400 $8,868 $652 $0 $0 $472 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $8.392 SUBCONSULTANTS 0 MISC.COSTS CAD $O M' $66 Other ODCs $22 Subtotal Phew 1 $8,500 Phew 2.60%Design Structural Des"n 40 Drafting 100 S waliona 6 40 8 Cost Ealimet. q 4 Internal OA/OC 4 8 Submittal Review Meeh 4 4 SUBTOTALLABOR CLASS HOURS a 54 B I 100 44 6 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $1,400 $8,8M $1.304 $11,400 $4,400 $364 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $27,660 SUBCONSULTANTS 0 MISC.COSTS CAD $2.000 Mlle $90 Other ODCs $250 Subtotal Phase 2 $30,0017 Phase 3-95%Design Structural Design 40 Orating 100 Spwfiwationa 6 40 8 Coal Etaimela 4 4 Intemal OA/OC 4 B Submittal Rsvlew Meeting 4 4 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 8 54 a 100 44 8 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $1,400 $3.802 $1,304 $11,400 $4,400 $364 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $27,660 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC.COSTS CAD $2.000 Mile a $BO Other ODCs $280 Subtotal Phew 3 $30.000 Phew 4-Bid Docurneat. Structural Design 10 D a0i 20 SpecAcati.. 4 20 Coal Estimate 4 Inta nal OMOC 4 SUBTOTALLABOR CLASS HOURS 4 1 18 0 20 20 0 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $700 $2,934 so $2,280 $2,000 $0 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $7,914 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC.COSTS CAD $40D Mil $36 Other ODCs $250 Subtotal Phew 4 $8,600 Phase 5-Bid Assletance/Consbuctlon Support Print and submit platns sets to pl,tn centore 2 e Print and submit plens 25 sets to city 2 g Pre-bid Meets 4 ConsWtation 4 4 Addendum Prep 8 16 8 SUBTOTALLABOR CLASS HOURS 4 18 0 18 0 e SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $700 $2,608 $0 $1,824 $0 $472 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $5,804 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC.COSTS CAD $320 Mil $90 Other ODCs S2.4601 SUt40Ml Phew 8 E8,464 Ph—6.Projoet Manopement eld S*t­up 4 Project Kckolf Meeting 2 2 21 2 2 Budget Rintia%s and Billings 12 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS HOURS 2 18 21 2 2 0 SUBTOTAL LABOR CLASS COSTS $350 $2,934 $326 $228 $200 $0 SUBTOTAL TASK LABOR COSTS $4.038 SUBCONSULTANTS $0 MISC COSTS CAD $0 M6 $82 Other ODCs I $0 Subtotal Phase 6 ,100 olal Hours 1 34 196 22 238 110 Total All Phases ,684 Mills Turk B.1,1 Est04O9 da AGENDA BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT ITEM# 8c . MTG. 6/21/04 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: June 8, 2004 BY APPRO D FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY . SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMEN with PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA FOR HOTEL SHOPPER SHUTTLE SERVICES CITY PROJECT NO. 736-64571 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution for Amendment No. 2 to the shuttle service agreement with Parking Company of America for two years. BACKGROUND:In May,2000 the Council approved a three year hotel shuttle agreement with Parking Company of America for services between the hotels and the Broadway and Burlingame Avenue commercial districts. In May, 2003 Amendment No. 1 extended the service for another three years until July, 2006. DISCUSSION: At the request of the hotels along the bayfront, City staff met with the hotel general managers, Chamber,Convention Bureau and Alliance members to expand the shopper shuttle service and change the shuttle vehicle to a trolley. The hotels have forwarded to the City a payment for the first six months of expanded service along with an agreement from all the participating hotels(see attached). The expanded schedule runs from 12:00 pm(noon)until 9:45 pm Sunday through Thursday and until 11:00 pm on Friday and Saturday,with an hour break in the middle of the afternoon for the driver. This adds about six hours per night Sunday through Thursday and two hours on Friday and Saturday. In addition, business district merchants have requested that the shuttle route be rerouted through the downtown streets. The shuttle will proceed along Broadway to El Camino Real with a new stop at Capuchino Avenue and down Burlingame Avenue to the current train station stop (see attached). BUDGET:The City has received payment for the first six months of the expanded trolley service and,as a result, funding is included in the 2004-2005 budget. Staff will meet later this year with the hotel operators to review the shuttle revisions and discuss the continuation of the expanded service. The City's current shuttle operator, Parking Company of America, has provided a quote for the new routes and extended hotel hours. The rate will be $ $49.37 per hour which is less than for the standard SamTrans bus shuttles. Amendment No. 2 will be terminated if the hotels elect to discontinue the expanded service and trolley vehicle in the future. ATTACHMENTS:Resolution;Agreement between the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Hyatt,Marriott,Crowne Plaza,Doubletree,and Sheraton Gateway hotels;2004 Burlingame Shopper Proposed Route; Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Shuttle Services Between the City of Burlingame and Parking Company of America Management c:Alliance-Mike Stevenson,Parking Company of America,City Manager,Finance Director,Financial Services Manager, City Attorney, San Mateo County Convention Bureau U:\FILES\Staff Reports and council presentationsWlliance-shopper revisions and vendor agree no 2 amendment 6-21-04.SR.wpd RESOLUTION NO. AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT ' Arft ' t5urlin - ame Shopper PROPO(YED t our Marriott Hotel 101 Hyatt Crowne Plaza Regent Doubletree Hotel �o S herato ea Broadway Area 101 �'�o Burlingame Area May 10, 2004 Binding Agreement between the San Mateo County Convention & Visitors Bureau ("the Bureau") and the following hotels: Hyatt SFO; SFO Marriott; Crowne Plaza SFO,Doubletree Hotel SFO; Sheraton Gateway. The hotels listed above understand that they owe the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (The Alliance),through payment to the City of Burlingame, a total of $34,072.26 in advance every six months to cover expanded shuttle service in the City of Burlingame for the ensuing six-month period. We understand that these payments are our responsibility. In order to allow the expansion of the shuttle to proceed,the Bureau has agreed to advance the amount of$34,072.26 to the Alliance(through the City of Burlingame)on behalf of the hotels. The hotels agree to reimburse the Bureau the full amount listed below no later than May 28, 2004. Should the hotels wish to continue their shuttle service beyond the initial six months, we will forward our individual property fees for the expanded shuttle to the Bureau and the Bureau will issue a single check to the City of Burlingame to provide the shuttle. Any contractual arrangements re: the shuttle will be between the group of hotels and the City of Burlingame and/or the Alliance. By signing below, each hotel representative acknowledges that his property owes the Bureau reimbursement in the amount listed, to be paid no later than May 28. Hyatt SFO $10,468.54; Signature Date: 5/10/04 Pls print name: L✓ru..AM SFO Marriott $9,005.85; Signature Date: 5/10/04 Pls print name: STAp Crowne Plaza SFO$4,042.20; Signature Date: 5/10/04 Pls print name: /-/ Tf2- Iq 1J�jq S A r9 AA r9w Doubletree SFO $5,296.32; Signature Date: 5/10/04 Pls print name-_ ��C� Sheraton Gateway Hotel $5,296.32; Signature Date: 5/10/04 Please print name: a O66'65� San Mateo County Convention Bureau Date: 5/10/04 Anne LeClair AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR SHUTTLE SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA MANAGEMENT, LLC City Project No. 736-64571 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2, made and entered into this day of , 2004, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation [hereinafter "City"], and PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA MANAGEMENT LLC [hereinafter "Contractor"], amends the Agreement between the parties dated July 10, 2000 with Amendment No. I of May 22, 2003 [hereinafter"Agreement"]. RECITALS WHEREAS, Contractor has provided shuttle services to the City for the past 4 years; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to continue that relationship for the remaining two (2) years of the existing Agreement but to expand the shopper shuttle service hours and to include a trolley vehicle. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Existing Renewal and Compensation Adjustments. The Agreement with the provisions below continues for the remaining years until June 30, 2006 unless the hotel operators do not provide financing for the trolley and expanded hours. 2. Vehicle. The Agreement is amended to include a trolley vehicle instead of a shuttle bus. 3. Compensation. City shall compensate Contractor for the services provided at the following rates: Monday through Sunday and holidays: $ $49.37 per hour 4. Routes Provided. The Contractor will continue to provide the Hotel Shopper Service pursuant to the Agreement with an extended route through the downtown business districts, Broadway and Burlingame Avenue generally serving the locations shown in Exhibit A to this Amendment No. 2. 1 5. Contractor understands that the service under this Amendment No. 2 and the Agreement are subject to be discontinued, reduced, or increased by the City at an time because of availability of funding, amount of rider ship, and other factors. 6. Except as expressly amended in this Amendment No. 2, all other terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 on the day and year first above written. CITY OF BURLINGAME PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA MANAGEMENT LLC By By City Manager Attest: Approved as to form: City Clerk City Attorney UAFILESW Nance and Caltrain stations\Burlingame Shopper Shuttle\PCA agree amendment no 2 6-21-04.wpd 2 WW OBURLINGAIME11WAGENDA STAFF REPORT ITEM# 8d MT6/21/04 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: June 7, 2004 BY 'f�-'ff"W VMW 960 APPROV D FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERV S CONTRACT WITH UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS FOR THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION, PHASE 2 - CITY PROJECT 81010 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution for a professional services contract with Underground Construction Managers (UCM) in the amount of $220,000 to provide construction management services for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 2. BACKGROUND:Staff received eight proposals in June,2002 for design and construction management for both phases of the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation project. Four firms were selected for interviews and UCM received the highest rating.Council awarded a design services contract to UCM for phase 1 and 2 in August,2002 and awarded a construction management services contract for phase 1 in June, 2003. DISCUSSION: The attached contract is for phase 2 construction management services. UCM has performed well in inspecting and in managing phase 1 construction in Burlingame Park as well as the complex Hatch Lane Sewer Rehabilitation project which was completed successfully last year. The scope of services includes full-time construction inspection and construction management services involving quality assurance, construction activities documentation and completion of as-built drawings. In addition,the scope includes coordinating construction activity with the neighborhood,performing public outreach regarding the work progress and developing a project website for public information. The fee of$220,000 represents 12.4% of the total anticipated project construction cost of$1,770,000 which is within industry standards for this type of work. The construction will begin in August 2004 and conclude approximately March 2005. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement with Scope of services BUDGET IMPACT: Construction management $220,000 Contingency (13%) 30,000 Total $250,000 There are sufficient funds available in the 2003/2004 Capital Improvement Project Budget. r Donald T. Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer (650) 558-7230 c: City Clerk S:A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81010consultant.wpd RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PHASE 2 CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be,and he is hereby,authorized to sign said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COL NCILMEM 3ERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PHASE 2 CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2004, by and between the City of Burlingame, State of California, herein called the "City", and UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS, engaged in providing PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING consulting services herein called the "Consultant". RECITALS A. The City is undertaking activities to REHABILITATE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IN THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION. B. The City desires to engage an Professional Engineering Consultant to provide consulting services in conjunction with REHABILITATING EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IN THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION, because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to perform the desired work. C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT A SHALL BE MADE AS PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide all services as set forth in Exhibit A of this agreement. 2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon the execution of this Agreement with completion as indicated in Exhibit A. 3. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business license. 4 . Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement. 5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the City upon the Revised: June 11, 2004 Page 1 of 6 CONSULT.CON.wRD.doc completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of the these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant. Consultant may retain a copy of such confidential documents for its records. 6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed $220,800; and payment shall be based upon City approval. Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at what rate and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only in partial or draft form. 7 . Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting This billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the City. 8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work under this Agreement shall be Dana Brock. 9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the City. 10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to: To City: Donald Chang/Sr. Civil Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 To Consultant: Dana Brock/Underground Construction Managers 665 Davis Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: 415-951-0653 / Fax: 415-434-0734 or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to City. 11. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the Revised: June 11, 2004 Page 2 of 6 CONSULT.CON.wRD.doc performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee (s) . With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing. 12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and shall, at the City's sole discretion, remove such person from the project. 13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act. 14. Insurance. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance: i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1, 000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant shall provide to the City all certificates of Revised: June 11, 2004 Page 3 of 6 CONSULT.CON.wRD.doc insurance, with original endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant agrees that all certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. iv. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than $1,000,000 which is sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement. B. General Liability: i. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned or used by the Consultant. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions. ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. C. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with the City Clerk. D. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law and shall provide evidence of such policy to the City before beginning services under this Agreement. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees. 15. Indemnification. The Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City its officers, agent, employees and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be set up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work to the extent caused by a willful or negligent act, errors or omissions of the Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant. 16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Revised: June 11, 2004 Page 4 of 6 CONSULT.CON.wRD.doc Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior or Municipal Court of the County of San Mateo or Santa Clara. 18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination. 19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Consultant. 20. Disputes. In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, as well as costs not to exceed $7,500 in total. 21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1) . City of Burlingame By Consultant: Underground Construction Mgrs. City Manager City of Burlingame Print Name Title ATTEST: Approved as to form: City Clerk City Attorney Revised: June 11, 2004 Page 5 of 6 CONSULT.CON.wRD.doc xNielT A April 6,2004 Mr.Donald P.Chang,P.E. Senior Civil Engineer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010-3997 Re: Proposal Construction Observation and Public Relations Services Burlingame Park Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2 Burlingame,California Dear Mr.Chang: Introduction Underground Construction Managers,Inc.(UCM)is pleased to respond to the City of Burlingame(the City)with this proposal to provide Construction Management and Public Relations services,including a project website,for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilition in Burlingame(the site)including two smaller sites known as Almer- Bellevue and 1400 Block Capuchino. This proposal is based on the design drawings and specifications we have prepared for the construction of the project. This proposal is intended to be responsive to the City's needs. If for any reason this proposal does not meet your expectations,please notify us and we will modify it. Background and Discussion The sites are in mature residential areas west of downtown Burlingame. The work will require installation and replacement of 6"to 12"sewer piping by open cut construction, pipe bursting,horizontal drilling and other methods,replacement of existing manholes, construction of laterals,minor concrete repair and abandonment of existing sewer facilities. Traffic coordination,noise and safety are important issues for the construction. Project Objective The overall project objective is to improve the condition and function of the sewer in the project area. We propose to meet this objective by managing construction activities so that the project is constructed as described in the project plans and specifications and appropriate decisions are made regarding any unforeseen or changed conditions. We will Mr. Donald Chang April 16, 2004 Page 2 also facilitate the process by providing public relations services, including neighbor notification and development and maintenance of a project website. Scope of Services Construction Mann eg ment We propose to achieve the project objective by providing an experienced construction management team to the project. UCM will provide full-time construction management for the City. Our personnel will provide pre-bid support, bid evaluation, coordinate, observe and document construction activities, respond to requests for information (RFIs) from the contractor, communicate with neighboring businesses regarding the work in progress and respond and document changed conditions. We will provide documentation in both paper and electronic form. Public Relations UCM will reactivate the website for the project that is linked to the existing City of Burlingame website. The project website will have general project information (locations, description of improvements, schedule of operations, project updates) which will be available for general public viewing as well as a document control section with restricted access. We will provide capability in the website to electronically manage project correspondence such as submittals, RFIs, incoming and outgoing letters. Our staff will visit the site one day per week to collect documents and distribute them into the appropriate areas of the website, which is essentially a part-time office engineering function. We plan to establish a hotline telephone number for the project. Our Resident Engineer will have business cards printed with the hotline phone number included. Mr. Donald Chang April 16, 2004 Page 3 Project Personnel UCM Previous experience Proposed responsibility Anticipated Hours Personnel on the design phase during construction during of this project phase construction Dana Brock, Design engineer-of- Oversight and review,key 244 P.E., C.E.G. record meetings Tim Grotts— Daily construction 1260 Primary observation as needed Inspector, Fred Garcia or Sandor Dorogi— Backup Inspectors Jose David Design support staff Website development and 300 maintenance Cristina Office support Public Relations 300 Serranzana Officer/Office Engin erinSupport Estimated Fees UCM proposes to provide services on a time and materials basis for the construction observation in according to our Standard Schedule of Charges. The project is estimated to require approximately 5-6 months. Fees for full time construction management are anticipated to be less than$221,000. Task Personnel # Hours Hourly rate Task total 1 Initial meeting Principal 4 $120 $ 480 Resident 4 95 380 Engineer Staff 4 60 240 2 Develop website Staff 40 60 2,400 3 Maintain the Public 300 60 18,000 website/distribute Relations notifications/office Officer engineeringengineenng support 4 Pre-construction(bid, Design 120 75 9,000 etc.) Support Mr.Donald Chang April 16, 2004 Page 4 Staff 5 Construction Principal 240 120 28,800 Management Resident 1100 95 119,700 Engineer 1 Resident 440 95 41,800 Engineer 2 Total $220,800 Schedule We anticipate the entire project will be completed in 6 calendar months. Assuming the construction starts in May or June the anticipated completion of construction would be around the end of 2004. Our staff is prepared to provide services immediately following authorization by the City of Burlingame. Our personnel currently plan to be available for the entire duration of the project. Terms and Conditions We would provide services based on our previous negotiated Agreements for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Burlingame,however,we are open to discussion any type of arrangement the City typically employs for this type of assignment. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have any questions please contact me at(415) 951-0653 or(415) 850-4943 (mobile). We look forward to working with the City on this and other interesting projects. Best regards, Dana J. Brock,P.E., C.E.G. Principal CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 8e a�oq 9,m MTG. �Aa,Eo JVNE6 DATE June 21,2004 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT BY eL�� DATE: June 21,2004 41 AP OVED B FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: PENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER MEDIATION SERVICES CONTRACT FOR FY 2004-05 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a funding agreement with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center(PCRC) for fiscal year 2004-05. BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame contracts with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center to provide mediation and conciliation services to residents, landlords, tenants, businesses and other persons needing these services. The services include: • Information and referral services. • One party assistance in conflict situations. • Conciliation services as a neutral third party. • Mediation services to resolve conflicts between two parties. • Recruitment and training of community volunteers. A complete listing of all services is included in the attached funding agreement document. The adopted budget contains $14,525 in the Other Non-Departmental account for this purpose. There is no increase in the amount of the agreement from fiscal year 2003-04. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Authorizing The City Manager to Execute Agreement with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center to Provide Conciliation and Mediation Service in FY 2004-2005 Agreement for the Provision of Community Mediation Services U:\City Council Agenda Reports\Peninsula Conflict Resolution Funding Agreement-FY05.doc Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 1660 South Amphlett Boulevard, Suite 219, San Mateo Ca 94402 650-513-0330• F650-513-0335 • www.percweb.org Agreement for the Provision of Community Mediation Services The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC),a 501(c)(3) public benefit corporation,wishes to provide conflict resolution services for the City of Burlingame (City). The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center is an independent contractor, organized in accordance with the laws of California and is capable of performing the conflict resolution services described in this agreement. PCRC and Burlingame agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. The PCRC shall provide the services described in Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this agreement. 2. FUNDING. Funding by the City shall be in advance and shall not exceed $14,525. PCRC shall provide documentation to specify how the funds requested shall be spent,including such details as the City deems appropriate. The City may request additional documentation. 3. CONTRACT TERM. This contract shall commence on July 1,2004 and shall terminate on June 30,2005 unless terminated before that time,as described in Paragraph 6 of this agreement. 4. PROGRAM REPORTS. A performance report shall be submitted to the City on a quarterly basis. This report shall include a description of all program activity related to this contract for the particular quarter. 5. BREACH OF CONTRACT. The City reserves the right to waive any and all breaches of this contract,any such waiver shall not be deemed a waiver of all previous or subsequent breaches. In the event the City chooses to waive a particular breach of this contract,it may condition said waiver on payment by PCRC of actual damages occasioned by such breach of contract. PCRC shall make every effort to resolve the breach quickly and amicably. 6. TERMINATION. In the event the PCRC is unable to fulfill its responsibilities under this contract for any reason whatsoever,including circumstances beyond its control,the City may terminate this contract. Either party to this agreement may terminate this contract without cause by giving 10 days written notice to the other party. 1 7. INTEREST OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS. No members, officer or employee or agents of the City,no member of the City Council,and no other public official exercising any function or responsibility with respect to this program during his/her tenure, shall have any interest, direct or indirect,in this contract or a related subcontract or the proceeds thereof. 8. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. It is expressly understood that PCRC is an independent contractor and that no agency,employee or other relationship is intended to be or is established by this contract. 9. INSPECTION OF PROGRAM. It is understood that periodic review of PCRC's program may be necessary and the right to do so is reserved by the City. 10. ASSIGNABILITY. PCRC shall not assign in this agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same,without the prior written consent of the City. 11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INSURANCE. PCRC agrees (1) to hold harmless and indemnify the City and its officers and employees from and against any and all claims,loss,liability, damage and expense arising from performance of this contract,including claims,loss,liability, damage and expense caused or claimed to be caused by passive negligence of the City or its officers or employees. (2) to defend (City),its officers or employees there-against;provided however that this provision does not apply to claims, loss,liability, damage or expense arising from (a) the sole negligence or willful misconduct of(City) or (b) the active negligence of(City). General liability and automobile liability insurance shall provide the following minimum benefits: (1) general liability,including comprehensive form,personal injury,broad form property damage,contractual and premises/operation in limits of$1,000,000. aggregate,bodily injury and property damage combined: (2) automobile liability in limits of$1,000,000,bodily injury and property damage combined. Additionally,workers compensation insurance in at least the minimum statutory amounts shall be maintained. All liability insurance policies shall specify (City),its elective and appointed boards,commissions, officers, agents and employees as additional insured. A certificate of insurance shall be provided to (City) prior to performance pursuant to this contract. It shall include policy endorsement verifying City's additional insured status. Further,any changes in insurance,required herein must be approved in writing by the City Attorney's Office. 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. a. General: No person shall,on the basis of race,color,national origin, religious affiliation or non affiliation,marital status,medical condition, sex, age,handicap,sexual orientation or political affiliation be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits or be subjected to discrimination,under this agreement. 2 b. Employment: PCRC shall ensure equal employment opportunity based on objective standards of recruitment,selection,promotion, classification,compensation, performance evaluation and management relations,for all employees under this agreement. PCRC's personnel policies shall be made available to the City upon request. 13. PROJECT REPRESENTATION. PCRC and the City hereby designate the following agents to act as project representatives and receive all notices in the matters dealing with the performance of work,under this agreement. PCRC: Patricia Brown,Executive Director CITY: James Nantell,City Manager 14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event that differences relating to this contract, or to the relationship between the contracting parties,should arise during the term of this agreement,both parties will pursue resolution using an interest- based,non-adversarial approach and utilizing the services of a neutral third party mediator if direct negotiations are not successful. 15. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS. Additional provisions,if any,are contained in Exhibit A,attached to this document. In witness thereof,the parties named above have duly executed this agreement. PENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER 1660 South Amphlett Boulevard,Suite 219 San Mateo,CA 94402 (650) 513-0330 By Date Patricia Brown,Executive Director A CITY OF Burlingame James Nantell,City Manager 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 By Date 3 EXHIBIT "A" I. What PCRC will provide: Conflict management and resolution services to be provided to the City of Burlingame through this contract are described below. A city which contracts for full membership with PCRC can offer its residents the following services: A. Information and Referral: A resource person is available by telephone,to assist residents who have specific questions relating to a conflict. Through this conversation the resident may clarify issues of concern,be given specific information about common practices related to landlord-tenant and community issues and receive a referral to an appropriate agency/resource. B. Information and Assistance: A resource person assists the concerned caller to de-escalate feelings,clarify issues and underlying needs, develop possible solution options,and begin to design an approach to dispute resolution. C. One Party Assistance:A resource person assists a caller to think through a conflict situation,including clarifying issues and interests of involved parties, exploring approaches to dealing with the situation and solution options and assisting with the selection of an approach to resolution. A follow-up call is arranged to determine the outcome of the situation,with the understanding that mediation would be the next step if negotiation were unsuccessful. D. Conciliation: Conciliation is the resolution of a conflict through the intervention of a neutral third party,without the disputing parties coming together in a face- to-face mediation. A resource person works with a resident,clarifying issues of concern,explaining approaches to seeking resolution, and gaining agreement by the party to pursue mediation and case intake. A case development process, involving contacts with both/all-involved parties,is initiated and during that process,a resolution of concerns is achieved,to the satisfaction of the involved parties. E. Mediation: Mediation through PCRC involves a face-to-face meeting between disputing parties who call PCRC directly or are referred by city staff or community agencies. With the assistance of a panel of trained volunteer mediators,parties work through a non-adversarial problem solving process and attempt to develop a mutually acceptable resolution to the issues of concern. There is a two-fold focus: development of a satisfying and durable agreement and the preservation of an effective relationship in situations where the parties will continue to be in contact with each other. F. Administration of a Community Mediation Program: In collaboration with the contracting city,PCRC will administer a mediation program responsive to the unique needs of the community. PCRC may utilize a program development 4 advisory committee and solicit input from city staff to develop an understanding of (1) unique areas of concern in the city, (2) potential approaches to program initiation and implementation, (3) long term goals for the program. Professional staff will manage and support the work of volunteers,who provide the direct service to clients in most instances. G. Promotion of Use of Conflict Resolution Services: A member city will participate in PCRC's community outreach program,which is designed to familiarize city staff,community service providers and the public with the use of non-adversarial conflict resolution services in a variety of conflict situations. This effort involves both PCRC staff and volunteers in making presentations, developing press releases and media coverage and identifying referral points where community members can receive information about PCRC services. Member cities are also expected to promote the use of conflict resolution services through city staff and in the community. H. Recruitment and training of community volunteers: PCRC will develop and maintain a pool of trained volunteer mediators,case developers and facilitators to serve the conflict resolution needs of the community. These residents of local communities will become skillful in the interest-based approach to conflict resolution. PCRC volunteers complete a minimum of 25 hours of training, according to regulations that govern programs receiving support from the Dispute Resolution Trust Fund established within the County. H. Ongoing skill development for volunteers:PCRC will offer regularly scheduled training to assist volunteers to improve and enhance their conflict resolution skills. There will be evening and weekend opportunities for learning and practicing advanced mediation,case development and facilitation skills and developing a base of knowledge in topics such as landlord tenant law,family dynamics,communication skills, and multi-cultural differences. K. Discounted Conflict Resolution Services: If the City,residents or local organizations want to utilize additional conflict resolution services offered by PCRC,they will receive a 20% discount on the fees charged to residents and organizations located in non-contract cities. Examples of the services available for a fee include: Special Training:PCRC offers orientations to city staff about the mediation program and its services as part of the basic contract. In addition,there are training opportunities for supervisory personnel,public contact employees and department managers that include theory and practice of interest-based conflict management,negotiation,mediation and facilitation skills. Conflict Assessment/Consultation:PCRC can assist cities, as well as local community organizations/groups to assess specific conflict situations,analyze concerns of stakeholders and develop strategies for pro-active and interest based conflict resolution. PCRC utilizes its staff,volunteers,professional mediators 5 and local representatives in this assessment process. The conflict assessment process usually involves third party neutral contact with stakeholders to gather input and provide information about interest-based conflict resolution. Conflict Resolution System Design: PCRC can assist organizations in building internal conflict resolution capacity,i. e. the development of policies and procedures for interest-based dispute prevention and early resolution. This service is tailored to the unique needs of the individual group,but is based on recognized and proven design principles. Design and facilitation of Community Forums,Public Conversations,and Dialogues: Through the Civic Engagement Initiative, PCRC is developing expertise in managing public discussions. Working with local representatives, PCRC will assist with the design and facilitation/recording for a wide variety of group sessions in which members of the public are encouraged to participate in dialogue about issues that affect the health and well being of the community. Facilitation of planning sessions for Committees,Departments,Councils: PCRC will assist with the design and facilitation of planning sessions for elected, appointed and civic groups who are coming together to plan for the future. H. What the City of Burlingame will provide: A. Funding in the amount of$14,525 for fiscal year 2004-05. This fee is full payment for the services defined above. Payments will be made upon receipt of invoice. B. Support for the program from city officers and staff members, demonstrated through public statements,publicity,and referrals through city departments to the mediation program. C. Free use of city-controlled public meeting space,as needed and as available,for training sessions,meetings and mediations. This use will be subject to the existing rules and regulations that govern the use of these spaces. III. Agreement by both parties,in concept: Both PCRC and the City recognize that this is an ongoing program. If the Community Mediation Program meets the terms of this agreement to the City's satisfaction,and in the absence of unexpected financial constraints,it is expected that the City will consider funding the Community Mediation Program,on an annual basis,as negotiated between the two parties. 6 CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 8f aoq 90 MTG. 4AATED JUNEd DATE June 21,2004 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT E BY DATE: June 21,2004 AP OVED BY FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director ✓ 558-7222 SUBJECT: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PROMOTIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR FY 04-05 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the promotional services contract with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce for fiscal year 2004-05. BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame contracts with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to provide promotional and information services to businesses, visitors and residents. The services include: • Distribution of materials and information to businesses and residents about Burlingame programs, events and activities. • Referral services to businesses and residents about Burlingame City government. • Sponsor and coordinate community events involving merchants, businesses and the public. • Promotion of business, community and economic development activities. • Business retention and relocation activities. A complete listing of all services is included in the attached funding agreement document. The adopted budget contains $27,620 in the Non-Departmental account for this purpose. Disbursements are made monthly to the Chamber. There has not been an increase in the contact amount for four years. In addition, $18,000 was encumbered in FY 2002-03 to pay for the promotional brochure on Burlingame shopping and dining. The Chamber has entered into a contract for printing the brochure and the amount will be paid upon receipt of the invoice. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreement with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to Provide Information and Promotion Services in 2003-2004. Funding Agreement for Promotional Activities—Chamber of Commerce U:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 2004-05.doc 6/14/2004 AGREEMENT PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES—CHAMBER OF COMMERCE This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 1St day of July, 2004, by and between the City of Burlingame, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce (hereinafter referred to as "Chamber"), with reference to the following Recitals: RECITALS: WHEREAS, City desires to promote its advantages as a business, educational, cultural, recreational and residential center, and to disseminate information relative thereto, and to properly respond to inquiries made from time to time relating to the various activities of City; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT: 1. Duties of Chamber. In exchange for the consideration specified in paragraph 3 below, Chamber shall perform the following promotional activities on behalf of City: a. Distribute materials and information to residents and businesses about Burlingame relating to the activities described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. b. Answer public inquiries about community facilities, events, organizations, businesses, and other community informational needs, through availability on a"walk-in"basis, as well as through mailings, telephone and e-mail. C. Provide referral services to citizens and businesses to appropriate City or government offices, including without limitation, the City Business License Bureau (located in the Water Department), Burlingame Recreation Department, Planning Department, Public Works Department, Police Department and Fire Department. d. Coordinate community events involving merchants and businesses requiring City services as follows: (i) coordinate with the Public Works Department to hang Christmas decorations in Merchant Areas; and (ii)help promotion by City. e. Sponsor/coordinate special events and activities involving businesses and the public, including the following: 14168.00004\13GLIB 1\1187929.1 1 (1) Coordinate Burlingame Avenue Area Businesses Association April and August Sidewalk Sale (2) Assist with the Merchant Holiday Open House and Tree Lighting (3) Assist the Recreation Department with advertising the Burlingame Millbrae Golf Tournament (4) Conduct seasonal Farmers' Market f. Produce/distribute materials about Burlingame, as follows: (i) Burlingame/Hillsborough Street Map. g. Promote business, community and economic development through the activities described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. h. Assist City with the continuation of the currently operating commuter shuttle service between the Broadway Caltrain station and the business area East of the Bayshore Freeway. i. Promote the retention and relocation of businesses to City by participating(in conjunction with City) in the activities of San Mateo County Economic Development Association. j. Maintain and operate an office open to the general public for discharging the obligations of Chamber under the terms of this Agreement (including, without limitation,promoting the residential and business attributes of City to the public). k. Employ competent personnel to carry on the promotional activities enumerated herein. 2. Certain Political Activities Prohibited. The Chamber shall not support, endorse or oppose any candidate for municipal, county or school elections in San Mateo County. The Chamber may conduct candidate debate forums or similar events of a public information nature. 3. Consideration. a. General Promotional Activities. City shall pay Chamber, in the manner specified below, the sum of Twenty-seven Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Dollars ($27,620) for general promotional services performed by Chamber hereunder for the period commencing July 1, 2004, and ending 14168.00004\13GLIB 1\I 187929.1 2 June 30, 2005. The foregoing sum shall be paid in twelve equal consecutive monthly installments commencing July 1, 2004. Chamber shall send to City on the first (1S) day of each month a written invoice describing in a summary manner the services for which Chamber is to be paid. Invoices dated the first day of each month shall be paid no later than the fifteenth day of each month. 4. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned by Chamber without the written consent of City. 5. Notices. All written notices and demands which either party may serve on the other may, as an alternative to personal service,be served by registered or certified mail. Any such notice or demand so served shall be deposited in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid and addressed to the party at the address specified below: City: City Manager City Hall 501 Primrose Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Chamber: Chair, Burlingame Chamber of Commerce 290 California Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Either party may change such address by notice in writing to the other party, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. 6. Relationship of parties. It is agreed the Chamber is an independent contractor and all persons working for or under the direction of Chamber or its agents, servants and employees are not agents or employees of City. 7. Termination. This Agreement shall commence on July 1•, 2004 and shall terminate on June 30, 2005, unless extended by the parties in writing. 8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 9. Entire Agreement. The terms of this Agreement are intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior or contemporaneous agreement. This Agreement constitutes the exclusive statement of its terms and no extrinsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial proceedings involving this Agreement. 14168.00004\13GLIB I\1187929.1 3 10. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any litigation between the parties hereto to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, the unsuccessful party to such litigation shall pay to the successful party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the successful party, all of which may be included as part of the judgment rendered in such litigation. 11. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement should be invalid or unenforceable the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby, and every provision hereof shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 12. Headings. The title and headings of the various sections hereof are included for purposes of reference only and are not intended to place any construction on the provisions hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. CITY OF BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE By By Attested: By By 14168.00004\13GLIB1A 187929.1 4 EXHIBIT A. DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS AND INFORMATION ABOUT BURLINGAME 1. Burlingame Demographics 2. Essential information for new Burlingame residents, including, without limitation, information materials for Burlingame Newcomers Club for all new Burlingame residents contacted by the club. 3. Community Event Information including: • Art In The Park • Broadway Festival (when applicable) • Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival Concert In The Park Series • Concerts at Kohl Mansion • Public Elementary School, Public & Private High School Events • Burlingame Night— S.F. Giants • Burlingame Millbrae Golf Tournament • Burlingame Avenue Area& Broadway BID'S. • Merchant Sidewalk Sales (April & August) • December—Merchant Holiday Open House and Tree Lighting 4. Public Transportation Information(Samtrans, Caltrain, BART and Burlingame Shuttle) 5. Historical Information—Burlingame 6. Churches,parks and schools in Burlingame 7. Wedding/Meeting Sites Information 8. Clubs and Organizations Information 9. Hotel and Restaurant Information 10. Realtor Information 11. Burlingame Business relocation assistance 12. Burlingame Business Economic Profile 14168.00004\13GLIB 1\1187929.1 5 13. Publication handouts include: • Burlingame/Hillsborough Street Map • San Mateo County Convention Bureau County Image Publication • Burlingame Golf Center • Burlingame Recreation Department Brochures (3 per year) 14. Social Service Resources 15. Provide direction or resource information to meet unique or uncommon requests 16. Burlingame Chamber/Business Annual Report—Independent Special Edition Insert 14168.00004\BGLIB I\I 187929.1 6 EXHIBIT B. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES PROMOTING BUSINESS, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Promotion of special community meetings, seminars and special events 2. Promotion of community events and services 3. Presentations to Burlingame Elementary Schools about Burlingame 4. Chamber Membership Advertising and Promotional Budget promotes Burlingame in coordination with the Business Associations and BID's 5. Prepare publicity releases for Community Events 6. On-going business economic development programs: • Hotels • Office Buildings • Providing SCORE counselor in Chamber office for business counseling • Support of Private Industry Council (PIC)—Youth for Employment Program 7. Chamber Representation at San Mateo County PROGRESS SEMINAR to study regional issues 8. Response to City of Burlingame requests regarding all business issues 9. Chamber/Business Annual Report—Independent Special Edition Insert 10. Promote the annual county business trade show 11. Burlingame Shuttle. 14168.00004\BGLIB 1\1187929.1 7 CITY G AGENDA 8g o ITEM# BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. DATE 6/21/2004 �APTEO ywE 60 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY .: DATE: June 14, 2004 APPROV BY '� FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: AFFIRM PAYMENT COMMITMENT TO CONSULTANT TO EVALUATE EMF PROVISIONS OF PROPOSED EMF ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: Affirm payment for services of EMF Consultant to evaluate EMF provisions of proposed EMF ordinance. DISCUSSION: On May 17, 2004, the City Council authorized the transfer of monies from the contingency reserve to pay up to $6,000 for an evaluation by a consultant of the proposed EMF ordinance. As part of that approval, the Council stipulated that the City would fund no more than one-third of the amount required and that the balance had to be funded by other agencies or groups. According to Dennis Zell, the following agencies or groups have agreed to the funding: $5,000—Burlingame School District $2,000—Concerned Residents $6,000—Peninsula Health Care District $6,000—Mills-Peninsula Hospital. Therefore, it appears that the funding has been made, and the City's share should be committed. $2,255,563.56 Ck.No.95414-96003 Excludes Library Cks.95414-95441 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for May 2004 $2,127,281.97 Ck.No.158396-158689 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION C ID c: 3 N � S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS f CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-10-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 FUND RECAP - 03.04 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 51,450.46 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 4,486.01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 30,309.18 .WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 21 ,930.51 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 291,355.22 WATER FUND 526 262,981 .83 SEWER FUND 527 12,581 .09 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 13,891 .15 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 374.33 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 2,940.55 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1 ,117.36 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 3,044.53 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1 ,340.84 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 443.53 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 297.69 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 6,410.64 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 2,853.30 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8707,808.22 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 95901 THROUGH 96003 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8707,808.22, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ...... . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . .. ...... . . . . ../. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . .. . . . .... . . . . ................. . . . .. .../. ../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '*' Denotes Hand Written Checks 95994 THE COHEN GROUP 24776 3,724.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 31724.50 320 80370 210 95995 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 4,486.01 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,486.01 130 20014 95996 LINDA'S TYPING AND DICTATION 24901 1 ,925.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 1 ,925.00 101 65100 292 95997 LORNA TRAUBE 24902 15.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 15.00 101 64350 210 95998 BRIAN FORNESI 24903 1 ,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 95999 MARK BURAN 24904 1 ,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,000.00 101 22525 96000 TERRASEARCH INC 24905 1 , 177.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11177.00 320 80370 210 96001 INTERNATIONAL HISPANIC NETWORK 24906 250.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 250.00 101 64250 240 96002 FRANK WALLEY 24907 6,600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600.00 101 22546 96003 LAURETTA PRINTING & COPY CENTER 24908 623.88 MISCELLANEOUS 623.88 101 64400 115 TOTAL $707,808.22 1 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95979 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 297.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 269.04 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28.83 619 64460 220 5240 95980 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 458.93 COMMUNICATIONS 274.92 101 68020 160 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 184.01 619 64460 160 95981 K.T. WOODS CONSTRUCTION 24334 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520 95982 FORBES INC. 24360 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 35100 95983 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 116.55 SMALL TOOLS 116.55 527 66520 130 95984 COMPUCOM 24467 359.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 359.42 101 68010 120 1101 95985 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 217,222.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 217,222.20 327 79480 220 95986 RICHARD HORNE 24489 445.61 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 445.61 101 66210 250 95987 MADAKET SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES 24508 472.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 472.50 101 68010 220 1646 95988 MIKE TORRISE 24596 168.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788 95989 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 913.82 UTILITY EXPENSE 913.82 896 20281 95990 BANK OF WALNUT CREEK 24613 24,135.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,135.80 327 79480 220 95991 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 82.53 COMMUNICATIONS 82.53 526 69020 160 95992 CENTER HARDWARE 24656 81.82 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.56 619 64460 120 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 71.26 619 64460 210 5110 95993 JESS LICON 24732 175.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 175.00 101 66210 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95968 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. 22632 33.59 OFFICE EXPENSE 33.59 101 65200 110 95969 JIM NANTELL 22762 775.62 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.80 101 64150 120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 124.06 101 64150 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 109.00 101 64100 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 490.76 101 69537 250 95970 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL 22924 309.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 309.00 101 65100 220 95971 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 2,093.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 586.25 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 816.56 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 690.94 327 79400 210 95972 OFFICE TEAM 23256 952.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 952.00 101 65300 110 95973 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 366.05 OFFICE EXPENSE 60.26 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 71.34 101 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 219.92 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 14.53 101 65200 110 95974 NCWLUA 23721 716.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 716.00 101 68010 120 1781 95975 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 3,317.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,317.50 528 66600 210 95976 SBC/MCI 23728 178.60 COMMUNICATIONS 178.60 101 65150 160 95977 KEITH MARTIN 23788 93.68 OFFICE EXPENSE 24.00 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.30 526 69020 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.25 527 66520 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.12 527 66520 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 22.22 527 66520 260 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.79 528 66600 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 8.00 620 66700 250 95978 ROCQUE YBALLA 23890 349.99 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 349.99 101 65200 190 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95955 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE 20144 984.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 984.00 621 64450 110 95956 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 20222 2,440.95 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,440.95 320 80520 210 95957 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 237.50 COMMUNICATIONS 237.50 621 64450 160 95958 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 33,514.20 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,781.67 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21,113.95 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,618.58 327 79400 210 95959 DAN COFFEY 20513 56.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56.00 101 68010 220 1788 95960 BAYSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS INC. 20650 16.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.23 527 66520 120 95961 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 20754 473.68 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 473.68 526 69020 290 95962 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 10,167.92 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 10,167.92 101 68020 800 2200 95963 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 494.16 MISC. SUPPLIES 494.16 527 66520 120 95964 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 187.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 51.92 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 135.35 101 64250 110 95965 PROVIDENCE PEST TERMITE 21947 290.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 42.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 42.00 619 64460 210 5170 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85.00 619 64460 210 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 79.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 42.00 619 64460 210 5160 95966 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 131.27 SUPPLIES 131.27 620 15000 95967 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,827.11 MISC. SUPPLIES 933.57 526 69020 120 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 893.54 526 69020 803 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95941 HAROLD FIELDS 16438 280.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 101 68010 220 1788 95942 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 60.18 TRAINING EXPENSE 60.18 620 66700 260 95943 PRIDE PAINT 17414 96.75 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 96.75 101 68020 190 2200 95944 COLORPRINT 17497 984.42 OFFICE EXPENSE 285.78 101 64250 110 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 698.64 101 64560 290 95945 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 250.57 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 250.57 625 65213 203 95946 SHAW PIPELINE INC 17959 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502 95947 MICHAEL ADAM 18275 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1788 95948 DOUG'S MOTORCYCLE SERVICE 18337 501.81 SUPPLIES 501.81 620 15000 95949 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 6,183.26 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 72.62 101 64200 150 MISCELLANEOUS 61110.64 731 22556 95950 A-ABCO RENTS & SELLS 19114 414.10 MISC. SUPPLIES 414.10 101 68010 120 1950 95951 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 132.92 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 72.33 101 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 60.59 625 65213 203 95952 WILSEY & HAM 19397 19,506.80 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,086.00 320 80880 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,385.40 320 80900 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,035.40 320 80880 210 95953 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210 95954 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 101 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95927 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,212.69 MISCELLANEOUS 20.79 101 68020 192 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 748.44 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 388.59 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.87 619 64460 120 95928 PIP PRINTING 10620 92.01 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 92.01 320 80520 220 95929 LEE STAMBOLIS 11361 392.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 392.00 101 68010 220 1788 95930 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY 11532 2,922.75 POLICE--SUPPLIES 2,922.75 101 65100 126 95931 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 18.55 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 18.55 625 65213 203 95932 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 175.65 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.65 527 66520 120 95933 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 3,218.74 MISCELLANEOUS 3,218.74 101 30400 95934 DON E. GIOVANNETTI 15229 168.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788 95935 TIM OLENO 15629 224.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 224.00 101 68010 220 1788 95936 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,700.00 101 68010 220 1787 95937 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 42.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 8.55 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 15.68 619 64460 120 5190 SUPPLIES 18.51 620 15000 95938 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 665.74 SUPPLIES 665.74 620 15000 95939 TEAM CLEAN 15827 254.77 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 254.77 101 65200 220 95940 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 34.62 SMALL TOOLS 34.62 620 66700 130 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T RE G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95913 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 6,119.81 PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 6,119.81 528 66600 210 95914 NATIONWIDE WIRE &BRUSH MFG. 03002 325.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 325.30 528 66600 120 95915 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 426.83 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.14 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 297.69 730 69560 120 95916 SBC 03080 1,939.48 UTILITY EXPENSE 1,939.48 896 20281 95917 DON PLAGMANN 03172 420.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 420.00 101 68010 220 1788 95918 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 259,772.40 WATER PURCHASES 259,772.40 526 69020 171 95919 SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03536 2,940.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,940.00 528 66600 210 95920 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,450.72 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,450.72 101 68020 220 2300 95921 B.E.J. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 210.60 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 16.79 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 74.47 528 66600 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 119.34 621 64450 110 95922 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. 09112 526.05 BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 526.05 101 68010 191) 1787 95923 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 493.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 493.50 101 68010 220 1891 - 95924 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 303.22 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 303.22 101 66210 219 95925 POM INC. 09248 374.33 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 374.33 530 65400 200 95926 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 2,940.55 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,940.55 618 64520 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95901 GRAY 'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 453.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 74.47 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 124.33 619 64460 120 5120 MISC. SUPPLIES 254.80 619 64460 120 5180 95902 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 70.47 SUPPLIES 70.47 620 15000 95903 BROADWAY HARDWARE 01435 9.73 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 9.73 101 65200 203 95904 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1 , 191 .90 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 31 .80 101 68020 200 2200 GAS, OIL & GREASE 51 .26 101 65200 201 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 31 .91 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.81 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 24.84 527 66520 120 SUPPLIES 843.19 620 15000 SMALL TOOLS 46.27 620 66700 130 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 113.82 625 65213 203 95905 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301 .63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301 .63 101 64560 220 95906 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 725.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 725.00 101 10700 95907 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 73.53 OFFICE EXPENSE 31 .37 101 68020 110 2200 OFFICE EXPENSE 42. 16 101 64250 110 95908 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 664.47 SUPPLIES 664.47 620 15000 95909 VEOLIA WATER 02110 50,997. 18 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 39,687.70 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 11 ,309.48 527 66530 190 95910 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 234.87 MISCELLANEOUS 234.87 101 68020 192 2200 95911 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 690.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 690.79 101 68020 120 2200 95912 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 165.04 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 165.04 101 66210 226 CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-04-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 FUND RECAP 03-04 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 73,816.68 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 702.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 143,243.03 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 100,953.30 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 171.50 WATER FUND 526 3,464.52 SEWER FUND 527 204,355.39 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,111.28 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 143.37 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 2,519.75 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 4,961.89 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 697.78 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 154.21 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,219.75 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 5.00 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 1,100.00 PUBLIC TV ACCESS FUND 738 1,840.00 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 5,321.88 DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 7,000.00 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $553,781.33 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 95784 THROUGH 95900 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $553,781.33, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ................................ .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95893 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 183.54 COMMUNICATIONS 14.19 101 65100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 169.35 101 66100 160 95894 ZACK LOUDON 24693 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1781 95895 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 594.55 MISCELLANEOUS 594.55 101 64420 030 95896 AD CLUB 24809 1,269.24 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 1,269.24 101 64420 150 95897 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 39.68 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 39.68 101 65200 203 95898 JOSH RUEMMELE 24858 196.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 196.00 101 68010 220 1787 95899 DORIS MORTENSEN 24871 21.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 21.50 320 81030 120 95900 FRANK GRIMAND 24899 300.00 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 300.00 618 64520 601 TOTAL $553,781.33 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95879 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 39,208.38 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 556.20 326 80770 210 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 31,811.17 326 80722 210 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 6,841.01 326 80931 210 95680 ATANACIO RODRIGUEZ 23543 738.00 MISCELLANEOUS 738.00 101 22546 95881 SBC/MCI 23728 5,321.88 UTILITY EXPENSE 5,321.88 896 20281 95882 JANNETTE GREER 23769 157.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50 101 68010 220 1648 95883 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,407.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,407.00 101 23620 95884 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 484.77 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38.60 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 315.96 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130.01 619 64460 220 5180 95885 QUILL 24090 81.84 OFFICE EXPENSE 81.84 621 64450 110 95886 FLORA ROSELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 95887 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 177.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 177.60 101 68010 220 1521 95888 WEST GROUP 24326 82.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 82.00 101.64400 120 95889 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 11,554.65 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 11,554.65 326 80910 210 95890 JACK'S AUTO TOP AND UPHOLSTERY 24505 291.42 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 291.42 625 65213 203 95891 C.L.E.A. 24523 702.00 MISCELLANEOUS 702.00 130 20026 95892 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 453.54 - COMMUNICATIONS 453.54 101 65200 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME - W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Nand Written Checks 95865 CAROL BRIA 22284 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1950 95866 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT. 22382 1,350.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,350.00 101 68010 220 1785 95867 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 425.00 MISCELLANEOUS 425.00 101 35220 95868 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.73 COMMUNICATIONS 38.73 101 68010 160 1101 95869 PITNEY BOWES RESERVE ACCOUNT 22624 5,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000.00 101 15500 95870 JIM NANTELL 22762 1,040.29 MISCELLANEOUS 1,040.29 101 64150 031 95871 JONES AND MAYER 22818 693.05 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 693.05 101 64350 210 95872 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 75.39 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 75.39 101 65100 140 95873 OFFICE TEAM 23256 952.00 MISCELLANEOUS 952.00 101 65300 010 95874 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 809.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 138.92 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 298.01 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 116.02 101 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 232.11 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 24.74 101 66100 120 95875 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 410.23 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 410.23 619 64460 210 5130 95876 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 65.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 65.98 619 64460 120 5240 95877 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 7,602.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,602.50 320 80800 220 95878 ROBERT ALFARO 23509 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95851 CIR 21211 587.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 587.92 527 66520 120 95852 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 1,989.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,389.00 619 64460 220 5120 95853 STANDARD & POOR'S 21394 7,000.00 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 7,000.00 930 66830 764 95854 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 34.02 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 34.02 625 65213 203 95855 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 4,464.74 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,339.43 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,339.42 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,339.42 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 446.47 619 64460 260 95856 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 72.37 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 72.37 621 64450 190 95857 D.L. FALK CONSTRUCTION INC. 21647 126,919.49 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126,919.49 320 80370 220 95858 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 30.95 SUPPLIES 30.95 620 15000 . 95859 ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. 21749 9,364.55 MISCELLANEOUS 8,264.55 320 80480 400 MISCELLANEOUS 1,100.00 734 65195 400 95860 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 21986 710.15 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S - 710.15 326 80770 210 95861 SOUTHWOOD PLUMBING 22151 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS 36.00 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 5.00 731 22518 95862 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,059.06. MISC. SUPPLIES 2,059.06 526 69020 120 95863 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 555.61 OFFICE EXPENSE 319.15 101 65100 110 COMMUNICATIONS 236.46 101 65150 160 95864 GERALD JOSEPH LASPINAS 22280 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 101 68010 220 1950 C � C CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95836 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 20.69 WATER PURCHASES 20.69 526 69020 171 95837 BURTON 'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 897. 15 VEHICLE MAINT. 26.60 101 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 340. 17 101 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 530.38 625 65213 203 95838 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 11111 .28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1 ,111 .28 528 66600 210 95839 BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC 19588 202.97 OFFICE EXPENSE 202.97 101 65200 110 95840 RACQUET SMITH 20339 3,876.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,876.00 101 68010 220 1782 95841 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 171 .50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 171 .50 327 77040 210 95842 DAPPER TIRE CO. , INC. 20464 43.74 SUPPLIES 43.74 620 15000 95843 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 470.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 470.00 527 66520 240 95844 ALLEGRA BROUGHTON 20766 1 ,300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,300.00 101 68010 220 1950 95845 LORI MOITIE 20768 875.00 . CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 875.00 101 68010 220 1950 95846 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 743.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 743.75 619 64460 210 5120 95847 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 1 ,505.41 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,505.41 101 65100 400 95848 HARDISON KOMATSU IVELICH & 20938 434.99 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 434.99 320 76010 210 95849 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 459.52 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 459.52 101 66210 219 95850 ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS 21177 1 ,840.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,840.00 738 64580 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95821 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,455.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,455.40 101 65100 220 95822 SYDNEY MALK00 16347 151.53 SMALL TOOLS 151.53 620 66700 130 95823 YVONNE CARR 17701 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 68010 220 1950 95824 CLAUDIO AMARAL SILVA 17816 1,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500.00 101 68010 220 1950 95825 SHAW PIPELINE INC 17959 49,480.12 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 49,480.12 326 80770 220 95826 TOOLS EXPRESS 18027 154.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 154.78 101 68020 120 2200 95827 1CMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 18050 1,320.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,320.00 101 64150 240 95828 PLASTI-PRINT, INC 18794 324.75 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 324.75 101 66210 222 95829 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 2,125.86 MISCELLANEOUS 2,125.86 618 64520 604 95830 BAY ALARM 18854 240.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118.50 619 64460 220 5140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 121.50 619 64460 220 5180 95831 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 45.35 TRAINING EXPENSE 45.35 526 69020 260 95832 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 229.76 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 116.26 101 64200 150 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 113.50 101 64200 250 95833 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 888.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 888.00 101 64420 210 95834 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 19131 518.93 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 518.93 101 65200 200 95835 SCOTT SAMMONS 19170 560.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 560.00 101 68010 220 1950 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95811 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,180.56 OFFICE EXPENSE 133.68 101 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.77 101 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 479.79 101 65200 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 87.77 101 65200 140 COMMUNICATIONS 116.62 101 65200 160 BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 230.00 101 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 6.80 101 65200 203 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 225.00 101 65200 240 TRAINING EXPENSE 771.13 101 65200 260 95812 SCHWAAB, INC. 11684 122.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 122.80 101 64350 120 95813 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 5,572.02 OFFICE EXPENSE 469.41 101 65100 110. MISC. SUPPLIES 182.98 101 65100 120 POLICE--SUPPLIES 399.18 101 65100 126 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 717.98 101 65100 140 COMMUNICATIONS 243.80 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 758.94 101 65100 200 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 190.00 101 65100 240 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 200.00 101 65150 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,582.76 101 65100 260 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 683.60 101 65100 292 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 143.37 530 65400 200 95814 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 467.00 PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 467.00 619 64460 210 5150 95815 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 993.14 MISC. SUPPLIES 979.61 101 68010 120 1114 VEHICLE MAINT. 13.53 101 65200 202 95816 DAVID MAGIDSON 14712 - 750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 101 68010 220 1950 95817 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 97.04 MISC. SUPPLIES - 97.04 101 66240 120 95818 DHL EXPRESS 14958 14.16 OFFICE EXPENSE 14.16 101 65100 110 95819 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 199.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 199.00 101 64420 121 95820 MARK ABDILLA 15502 275.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 101 68010 220 1950 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95798 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 361.65 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 361.65 101 64350 210 95799 ROTO ROOTER 09063 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 95800 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 62.81 MISC. SUPPLIES 62.81 619 64460 120 5170 95801 FASTSIGNS 09136 2,710.58 MISCELLANEOUS 2,710.58 101 68010 400 1100 95802 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 27.05 OFFICE EXPENSE 27.05 101 66210 110 95803 ABAG PUBLICATIONS 09516 91.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 91.60 101 64400 120 95804 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 71.69 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 71.69 618 64520 210 95805 OLE'S 09626 471.56 SUPPLIES 471.56 620 15000 95806 ED NAKISO 09770 2,657.61 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,657.61 101 64420 210 95807 GOVT. FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN. 09884 200.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 200.00 101 64250 240 95808 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 107.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 107.60 101 65200 111 95809 PIP PRINTING 10620 263.39 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 263.39 101 64350 210 3100 95810 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,363.93 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,363.93 625 65213 203 r C CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R AN T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/04/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95784 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 37.89 FIRE APPARATUS. MAINT. 37.89 101 65200 203 95785 BRENTON SAFETY, INC. 01400 2,940.60 TRAINING EXPENSE 117.55 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,823.05 527 66520 260 95786 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 205.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 35.00 101 64100 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 170.00 101 64150 250 95787 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL 01991 3,197.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,197.00 101 65100 220 95788 VEOLIA WATER 02110 199,135.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,135.00 527 66530.220 95789 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 540.42 MISCELLANEOUS 540..42 101 68020 192 2200 95790 FEDEX 02160 50.20 OFFICE EXPENSE 28.00 .101 64150 110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22.20 618 64520 210. 95791 BRADLEY D. FLOYD 02171 620.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 620.00 101 65100 260 95792 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 194.00 VEHICLE MAINT. 103.66 101 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 38.46 101 65200 203 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 51.88 619 64460 210 5140 95793 P. G. & E. 03054 11,348.57 . GAS & ELECTRIC 11,348.57 101 66240 170 95794 SBC 03080 50.32 OFFICE EXPENSE 50.32 101 65100 110 95795 SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE 03310 560.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 560.00 101 68010 150 1950 95796 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 734.76 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 734.76 101 64150 210 95797 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,853.98 COMMUNICATIONS 18.14 101 65200 160 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,835.84 101 65150 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME 05.27-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 FUND RECAP - 03-04 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 108,449.46 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 13,518.34 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 58,548.68 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 12,796.21 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 143.00 WATER FUND 526 2,775.79 SEWER FUND 527 10,926.78 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 2,550.00 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 27,469.51 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 4,890.65 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 14,828.62 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 770.31 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,037.21 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,081.42 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 188,707.25 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,800.01 FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 14,384.02 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 38,218.07 TOTAL. FOR APPROVAL $502,895.33 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 95676 THROUGH 95783 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $502,895.33, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ........... ................ .../. ./. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95779 WIDE PALETTE 24894 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 95780 CALVIN WALTERS 24895 335.00 MISCELLANEOUS 335.00 101 36630 95781 LINDSAY CALDWELL 24896 1 ,581 .59 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1 ,581 .59 618 64520 601 95782 A.L.D. COMPANY INC 24897 1 ,871 .60 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 1 ,871 .60 101 65100 140 95783 RECREONICS 24898 1 ,023.99 MISCELLANEOUS -78. 19 101 23611 MISCELLANEOUS 1 , 102. 18 101 68010 400 1100 TOTAL $5021895.33 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95764 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 95765 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024 95766 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 455.00 UNION DUES 455.00 130 21091 95767 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 313.64 130 21092 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6.96 130 21015 95768 HONEYWELL INC. 24545 916.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 916.50 320 80790 210 95769 JOHN ALGARME 24573 820.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.00 101 68010 220 1661 95770 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 556.37 COMMUNICATIONS 49.10 101 64250 160 COMMUNICATIONS 507.27 101 65100 160 95771 RUTAN & TUCKER LLP 24678 2,595.58 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,595.58 618 64520 210 95772 DATA 911 24689 14,384.02 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 14,384.02 737 65180 800 95773 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 249.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.00 101 65100 220 95774 AETNA 24760 2,810.40 MISCELLANEOUS 217.04 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,593.36 130 20022 95775 COMMUNITY PLAYGROUNDS 24777 13,938.10 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,938.10 320 80970 220 95776 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,383.34 MISCELLANEOUS 1,179.75 130 20025 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,203.59 130 20021 95777 MARY PIAllA 24807 340.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 95778 JOHNNY DANG 24893 960.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 960.00 101 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95750 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 6,399.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,399.00 101 68010 220 1331 95751 GREG HAGEY 23746 3,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,400.00 101 22546 95752 CHERI NICHOL 23901 340.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 95753 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 32.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 32.00 101 64420 210 95754 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 95755 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 200.97 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.97 619 64460 220 5130 95756 QUILL 24090 194.90 OFFICE EXPENSE 7.52 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 187.38 621 64450 110 95757 ABE KIRSCHENBAUM 24136 450.00 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 450.00 619 64460 250 95758 88 PHOTO LAB 24279 5.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.40 101 68020 120 2300 95759 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 472.87 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 472.87 101 68010 220 1661 95760 NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION 24485 60,230.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,000.00 101 66210 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,637.00 320 79380 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,990.00 320 79390 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,950.00 320 79380 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,653.00 326 80320 220 .95761 ELIZABETH BURG 24486 180.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 180.00 101 68010 220 1661 95762 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,705.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,705.00 130 20016 95763 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95735 DKS ASSOCIATES 22468 9,900.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,900.00 320 79160 210 95736 UNITED RENTALS 22736 175.82 SUPPLIES 175.82 620 15000 95737 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 526 69020 233 95738 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 640.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 640.00 101 68010 220 1641 95739 NADINE RONSON 23195 267.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 267.75 101 68010 220 1661 95740 OFFICE TEAM 23256 952.00 MISCELLANEOUS 952.00 101 65300 010 95741 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 326.74 OFFICE EXPENSE 101.66 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 37.15 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 187.93 621 64450 110 95742 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 168.12 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 168.12 619 64460 210 5180 95743 KELLY VENEZIA 23320 160.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 160.00 101 68010 220 1661 95744 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 218.73 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 154.58 619 64460 210 5210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.15 619 64460 210 5240 95745 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 650.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 650.00 101 68010 200 1286 95746 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 6,143.21 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,143.21 326 81110 210 95747 LIEBERT GLOBAL SERVICES 23551 2,880.48 ' PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,880.48 619 64460 210 5130 95748 EASTMAN KODAK CO. 23597 658.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 658.00 101 65100 220 95749 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 25.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 25.00 619 64460 250 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95720 JACKIE COOPER 21469 540.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 420.00 101 68010 220 1646 _ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1644 95721 SHERATON GATEWAY HOTEL 21471 4,032.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,032.27 101 64100 120 95722 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 595.70 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 595.70 625 65213 203 95723 MONICA EHLERS 21627 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 68010 220 1661 95724 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 42.34 SUPPLIES 42.34 620 15000 95725 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 136.47 COMMUNICATIONS 136.47 101 65300 160 95726 ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. 21749 2,550.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 2,550.00 530 65400 200 95727 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 859.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 257.70 101 68010 120 1789 MISC. SUPPLIES 257.50 101 68010 120 1785 MISC. SUPPLIES 344.59 101 68010 120 1788 95728 AT&T 22138 22.16 COMMUNICATIONS 22.16 101 65100 160 95729 JORGENSON, SIEGEL, MCCLURE & FLE 22144 135.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 135.00 101 64350 210 95730 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 61.52 SUPPLIES 61.52 620 15000 95731 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 194.18 MISC. SUPPLIES 194.18 526 69020 120 95732 AUTO PRIDE CAR WASH 22278 116.35 VEHICLE MAINT. 116.35 101 65200 202 95733 AMERICAN BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS 22339 2,162.84 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 1,081.42 101 68010 150 1950 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 1,081.42 730 69544 150 95734 DONALD SHEPLEY 22375 637.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 637.00 101 64420 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S TE R PAGE 3 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Nand Written Checks 95706 WESTERN RIGGING PRODUCTS INC 18976 185.00 BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 185.00 101 68020 190. 2200 95707 ACCESS UNIFORMS 8 EMBROIDERY 18990 142.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 142.40 526 69020 120 95708 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 228.80 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 228.80 101 64420 121 95709 MILESTONE PRODUCTS 19028 392.29 MISC. SUPPLIES 392.29 101 68010 120 1950 95710 PEGGY GUARALDI 19044 340.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 340.00 101 68010 220 1661 95711 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 459.18 PUBLICATIONS 8 ADVERTISING 316.18 101 64200 150 MISC. SUPPLIES 143.00 327 81010 120 95712 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 269.98 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 269.98 101 65200 203 95713 MONICA OLSEN 19832 434.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 434.40 101 68010 220 1661 95714 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 5,660.01 RENTS 8 LEASES 1,930.00 526 69020 180 RENTS 8 LEASES 1,930.00 527 66520 180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,800.01 736 64570 220 95715 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 395.00 COMMUNICATIONS 395.00 621 64450 160 95716 PACIFIC GAS 8 ELECTRIC 20335 2,217.08 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,217.08 320 80370 220 95717 SPRINT PCS 20724 77.13 COMMUNICATIONS 38.56 101 64420 160 COMMUNICATIONS 38.57 101 64150 160 95718 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 2,078.11 MISCELLANEOUS 2,078.11 101 68010 400 1101 95719 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 58.62 SMALL TOOLS 58.62 101 68020 130 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W AR R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 95691 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 7,070.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 7,070.00 101 65100 291 95692 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 23,292.34 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,133.45 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 3,158.89 618 64520 601 95693 OLE'S 09626 113.07 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 113.07 625 65213 203 95694 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 328.44 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 328.44 625 65213 203 95695 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 171.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 117.17 527 66520 120 SUPPLIES 53.86 620 15000 95696 TRESSER'S TOW SERVICE 15543 75.00 SUPPLIES 75.00 620 15000 95697 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,455.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,455.40 101 65100 220 95698 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,794.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,794.25 101 68010 220 1787 95699 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 13,368.12 SUPPLIES 13,368.12 620 15000 95700 PARK-GILMAN CLINICS, INC. 15792 400.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 400.00 101 65100 291 95701 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 20,124.99 MISCELLANEOUS 20,124.99 101 22515 95702 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 9.73 MISC. SUPPLIES 9.73 619 64460 120 5240 95703 NATURCLEAN 18830 2,008.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,008.50 527 66520 120 95704 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM 18900 6,698.50 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 6,698.50 527 66530 270 95705 THE COURT WORKS EQUIPMENT 18952 687.39 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 687.39 101 68010 190 1106 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 05/27/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95676 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 36.34 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 36.34 101 65200 203 95677 WHITE CAP 01250 232.91 MISC. SUPPLIES 232.91 101 66240 120 95678 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 950.65 SUPPLIES 950.65 620 15000 - 95679 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,416.69 MISCELLANEOUS 2,416.69 896 20282 95680 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 169.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 9.21 526 69020 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 160.74 619 64460 210 95681 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,238.90 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 66.04 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,172.86 101 66210 226 95682 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 162.38 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 162.38 527 66520 230 95683 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 - 494.19 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 392.88 619 64460 210 SMALL TOOLS 101.31 620 66700 130 95684 P. G. & E. 03054 35,811.61, GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520.170 UTILITY EXPENSE 35,801.38 896 20280 95685 SBC 03080 99.97 COMMUNICATIONS 99.97 101 65100 160 95686 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 220.83 MISC. SUPPLIES 220.83 101 68010 120 1788 95687 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 384.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 384.00 619 64460 210 5240 95688 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 188,707.25 MISCELLANEOUS 188,707.25 731 22587 95689 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 17,343.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,343.20 101 68020 220 2300 95690 JEAN BUCKS 09019 495.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 495.00 101 68010 220 1644 CITY OF BURLINGAME 05-21-2004 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 03.04 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND - 101 96,343.73 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 757.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 19,251.38 WATER FUND 526 6,801.88 SEWER FUND 527 1,111.02 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 27.60 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 5,808.45 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 13,433.75 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 8,934.26 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,574.04 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 28,402.46 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 501.32 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 624.49 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,255.48 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 12,132.46 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 3,027.27 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8209,986.59 ! \ A"DO>VO0 UC. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 95563 THROUGH 95675 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,986.59, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ............I....................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95669 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 629.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 239.00 130 20015 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 390.00 130 20060 95670 TOM DONNELLY 24830 648.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 648.00 101 65200 260 95671 MAE O'MALLEY 24849 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 95672 SUBURBAN PROPANE 24863 237.01 _ TRAINING EXPENSE 237.01 101 65200 260 95673 BATTERIES AND BUTTER 24889 370.47 MISCELLANEOUS -29.52 101 23611 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 399.99 101 65200 203 95674 PIERRE UHARRIET 24890 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 95675 EMEDCO 24891 378.36 MISCELLANEOUS -29.63 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 407.99 101 66240 120 TOTAL 8200,986.59 C \ CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95656 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 1,287.60 DEPOSIT REFUND 1,287.60 101 22590 95657 NEIL YELLIN 24220 2,250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546 95658 CWS UTILITY SERVICES 24249 1,152.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,152.00 526 69020 233 95659 THE BERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 3,672.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,672.00 101 68010 220 1349 95660 ALERT-ALL 24392 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS -8.25 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 108.25 101 65200 120 _ 95661 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 1,740.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,740.00 101 68010 220 1661 95662 NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION 24485 17,076.96 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,076.96 320 80590 220 95663 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 135.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 135.82 619 64460 210 5180 _ 95664 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 4,800.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,800.00 619 64460 210 5120 95665 GOODIN,MACBRIDE,SQUERI,RITCHIE & 24638 72.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 72.04 101 64350 210 3100 95666 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 420.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 420.00 101 68010 220 1660 95667 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 1,414.58 OFFICE EXPENSE 79.02 101 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 144.75 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 93.87 101 67500 120 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 40.57 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 675.39 101 67500 129 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 262.75 101 65100140 COMMUNICATIONS 49.66 101 64250 160 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 38.12 101 64420 250 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 30.45 530 65400 140 95668 CHARLES SONNICI 24770 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95641 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 101 .00 MISCELLANEOUS 101 .00 101 22518 95642 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1 ,573. 15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1 ,573. 15 621 64450 200 95643 J .D. CESARE 23443 225.00 MISCELLANEOUS 225.00 101 36310 95644 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 296.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 296.80 101 68010 220 1762 95645 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 227.91 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 227.91 619 64460 210 95646 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 1 ,004.42 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 339.91 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 110.39 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 504. 12 619 64460 210 5240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 619 64460 250 95647 BANK OF AMERICA 23711 1 ,471 .62 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,471 .62 101 32100 95648 CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 23862 460.48 MISCELLANEOUS 460.48 731 22587 95649 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 100.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 100.00 101 66210 218 95650 MERRITT SMITH CONSULTING 23903 2,725.47 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,725.47 526 69020 210 95651 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1 ,883.97 BANKING SERVICE FEES 533.97 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1 ,350.00 530 65400 120 95652 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 116.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 116.00 619 64460 220 5110 95653 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220 95654 BAVCO 24002 221 .45 MISC. SUPPLIES 221 .45 526 69020 120 95655 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 24030 66.71 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.71 101 65200 200 l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95631 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 520.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 520.00 896 20281 95632 JENKINS/ATHENS INS 22851 9,184.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,184.00 618 64520 225 95633 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS 23087 28.88 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 28.88 101 65200 240 95634 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 1,500.00 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 526 69020 764 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 527 66520 764 95635 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 190.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 190.00 526 69020 210 95636 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00 COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 101 65200 160 95637 OFFICE TEAM 23256 952.00 MISCELLANEOUS 952.00 101 65300 010 95638 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 2,466.65 OFFICE EXPENSE 296.63 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 46.19 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 267.38 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 51.91 101 65100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 186.35 101 65300 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 382.46 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 752.62 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 141.82 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.81 527 66520 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 229.48 619 64460 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 101.00 620 66700 110 95639 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 698.05 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.01 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 64.30 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 55.45 101 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 172.12 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 195.89 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 33.54 101 64400 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 174.74 101 66100 120 95640 SAN FRANCISCO EXAMINER 23366 6,548.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,196.00 101 68010 115 1101 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 1,352.00 101 64200 150 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95617 CIR 21211 430.45 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.45 101 66210 220 95618 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 846.16 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.82 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 635.34 619 64460 220 5110 95619 THE BANK OF NEW YORK 21439 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 32100 95620 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 89.72 MISCELLANEOUS 89.72 101 64400 400 95621 IMSA CERTIFICATION 21579 570.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 570.00 101 66210 260 95622 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC. 21634 988.48 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 251.58 101 66210 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 13.80 101 66240 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 293.00 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 251.58 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 27.60 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 87.80 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 63.12 620 66700 140 95623 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 196.80 COMMUNICATIONS 196.80 101 66100 160 95624 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 8,994.12 MISCELLANEOUS 8,994.12 101 37010 95625 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 19,638.50 MISCELLANEOUS 19,638.50 101 37010 95626 EXPRESS PLUMBING 22092 1,050.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,050.00 101 22520 95627 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 40.51 SUPPLIES 40.51 620 15000 95628 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 935.00 MISCELLANEOUS 935.00 101 35220 95629 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 12,132.46 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,132.46 736 64571 220 95630 UNITED RENTALS 22736 976.01 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 976.01 619 64460 210 5120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95601 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 404.06 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 404.06 101 65100 200 95602 COLORPRINT 17497 2,310.60 MISCELLANEOUS 2,310.60 621 64450 400 95603 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 275.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 275.00 101 65200 260 95604 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 540.71 OFFICE EXPENSE 540.71 101 65100 110 95605 MEHMET DEMIRKOL 19029 1,500.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,500.00 101 22520 95606 MARY JANNEY 19042 128.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 128.00 130 20015 95607 TOM AMES 19502 648.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 648.00 101 65200 260 95608 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 124.49 MISC. SUPPLIES 124.49 730 69560 120 95609 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 19697 70.05 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 70.05 101 68020 200 2200 95610 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP INC 19791 765.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 101 65300 220 95611 COUNTY SUPPLY CO INC 19946 495.64 MISC. SUPPLIES 495.64 101 65200 111 95612 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 20335 2,076.98 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,076.98 320 76010 210 95613 ARLETTE PETERSON 20547 496.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 496.00 101 68010 220 1349 95614 PIONEER SAWDUST 20573 267.40 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 267.40 101 65200 203 95615 MELANIE MARANI 21132 640.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 640.00 101 68010 220 1331 95616 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 1,795.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 1,795.00 731 22590 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95586 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 679.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 90.00 101 68020 120 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 589.87 101 66210 222 95587 GARY M. OLSON, PH.D. 09902 300.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 300.00 101 64420 121 95588 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 225.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 101 65200 220 95589 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 11,717.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,141.00 101 68010 010 1100 MISCELLANEOUS 3,330.00 101 65300 010 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 818.00 101 67500 011 MISCELLANEOUS 4,428.00 530 65400 010 95590 PIP PRINTING 10620 97.44 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 97.44 320 79300 210 95591 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 71.50 PROFESSIONAL& SPECIALIZED S 71.50 101 64350 210 95592 ROMEO PACKING CO 11348 703.63 MISC. SUPPLIES 703.63 101 68020 120 2200 95593 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 45.45 OFFICE EXPENSE 45.45 619 64460 110 95594 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO 13758 541.63 OFFICE EXPENSE 541.63 621 64450 110 95595 THE MAGIC PRESS CORP. 13759 663.57 OFFICE EXPENSE 663.57 101 65100 110 95596 A T & T 13940 581.66 UTILITY EXPENSE 581.66 896 20281 95597 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 131.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 131.98 101 66240 120 95598 DHL EXPRESS 14958 18.96 OFFICE EXPENSE 18.96 101 65100 110 95599 LINDA HOECK 16390 1,760.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,760.00 101 68010 220 1349 95600 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS 17141 6,997.30 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,997.30 101 68020 220 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95575 SBC 03080 1,925.61 UTILITY EXPENSE 1,925.61 896 20281 95576 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 300.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 300.00 101 65100 120 95577 ROTO ROOTER 09063 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5.00 101 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 36.00 101 31510 95578 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 271.16 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 263.44 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 0.60 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.12 619 64460 120 5240 95579 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 85.77 SUPPLIES 85.77 101 65200 112 95580 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 111.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 111.50 101 68020 120 2200 95581 OCE'-BRUNING, INC. 09493 857.35 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.35 101 66100 210 95582 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 4,249.75 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 4,249.75 618 64520 601 95583 BERNARD EDWARDS 09548 1,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600.00 101 68010 220 1762 95584 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 2,880.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,880.00 101 68010 220 1661 95585 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,584.25 MISC. SUPPLIES 586.78 101 68020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 26.19 101 65200 130 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 38.94 101 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 18.34 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 109.56 526 69020 120 SMALL TOOLS 299.64 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.84 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 6.47 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 37.04 619 64460 120 5140 MISC. SUPPLIES 227.70 619 64460 120 5170 MISC. SUPPLIES 156.74 619 64460 120 5130 MISC. SUPPLIES 36.01 619 64460 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 05/21/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95563 ACCUTITE ENVIRONMENTAL 01035 295.62 MISCELLANEOUS 12.58 101 36341 MISCELLANEOUS 204.42 101 22515 MISCELLANEOUS 78.62 101 36310 95564 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 329.50 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 329.50 625 65213 203 95565 BRENTON SAFETY, INC. 01400 48.08 TRAINING EXPENSE 48.08 527 66520 260 95566 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,834.44 GAS, OIL & GREASE 19.44 101 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 307.84 101 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 14.78 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.24 527 66520 120 SUPPLIES 1,251.79 620 15000 MISC. SUPPLIES 65.53 620 66700 120 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 171.82 625 65213 203 95567 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 1,075.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 1,075.00 101 10700 95568 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 52.09 SUPPLIES 52.09 620 15000 95569 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 23,977.08 OFFICE EXPENSE 125.00 621 64450 110 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 23,552.08 621 64450 220 95570 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., 01992 548.83 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 548.83 101 65150 200 95571 GENE EVANS 02149 148.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 148.50 101 68010 220 1644 95572 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 1,102.16 MISCELLANEOUS 183.18 101 68020 192 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 918.98 101 68020 400 2200 95573 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 166.32 SMALL TOOLS 166.32 526 69020 130 95574 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 248.05 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 248.05 101 66210 226 CITY OF BURLINGAME 04-12-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 FUND RECAP 03-04 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 100,844.58 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 63,808.30 E1/'�/v `/ rej WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 6,581.74 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 37,596.79 WATER FUND 526 16,026.64 SEWER FUND 527 20,063.57 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,268.75 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 16,208.62 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 14,330.58 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,133.44 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 740.56 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 173.91 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 450.32 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 9,691.27 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $292,919.07 Vol D Lf5o.cm� Vu b `4���I�3 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 95442 THROUGH 95562 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $292,919.07, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95552 KEN GOLDBERG 24861 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 95553 KIEFER AND ASSOCIATES 24869 596.14 MISCELLANEOUS 596.14 101 68010 400 1100 95554 EASTSHORE CHARTER LINES 24880 560.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 560.00 101 68010 120 1422 95555 TROPOS NETWORKS 24881 9,691.27 MISCELLANEOUS 9,691.27 734 65195 400 95556 N&K TRUCKING AND BOBCAT 24882 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 95557 THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL 24883 119.90 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 119.90 526 69020 240 95558 LEO REDMOND 24884 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 .101 22525 95559 JEFF NOVITSKY 24885 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 95560 FRANK PORTMAN CO. 24886 3,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520 95561 KEVIN PARKIN 24887 1,200.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,200.00 101 22520 95562 DENNIS MOORE 24888 52.58 MISCELLANEOUS 52.58 526 22502 TOTAL 8292,919.07 C CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95540 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 14,299.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 133.75 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 551.34 101 68010 120 1111 MISC. SUPPLIES 145.49 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 896.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,386.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 732.00 619 64460 220 5210. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,967.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 355.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,885.00 619 64460 220 5110 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 292.09 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,856.00 619 64460 220 5180 95541 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 - 581.24 COMMUNICATIONS 581.24 619 64460 160 95542 SAN MATEO COUNTY EAC 23967 75.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 75.00 101 64420 240 95543 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 7,242.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,242.50 320 80520 210 95544 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,152.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,152.00 101 68010 220 1644 95545 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 4,163.32 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,163.32 326 80950 210 95546 ROB EICHENSEHR 24676 384.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 384.00 . 101 22520 95547 GENSLER 24758 48,448.80 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 48,448.80 320 80760 210 95548 AD CLUB 24809 150.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 150.00 101 64420 150 95549 PETER CHIANG 24844 3,400.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,400.00 101 22520 95550 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65100 160 95551 EBBA IRON SALES, INC. 24857 40.00 SMALL TOOLS 40.00 326 80320 130 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT �•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 95528 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 23306 456.18 OFFICE EXPENSE 456.18- 101 68010 110 1101 95529 RCSI 23354 23,750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23,750.00 101 66210 220 95530 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 92.56 MISC. SUPPLIES 46.28 101 66210 120 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 46.28 101 66210 226 95531 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 139.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 139.20 101 68010 220 1661 95532 GARY DIEBEL 23544 1,440.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,440.00 101 22546 95533 ANDREW FREEMAN 23653 125.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 101 68010 220 1422 95534 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 13.54 TRAINING EXPENSE 13.54 526 69020 260 95535 SBC/MCI 23728 178.60 COMMUNICATIONS 178.60 101 65150 160 95536 PENINSULA HARLEY DAVIDSON 23795 283.03 SUPPLIES 283.03 620 15000 95537 LARRY STENGER 23820 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22546 95538 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 9,985.00 MISCELLANEOUS 9,985.00 526 69020 233 95539 DAVE CREAMER 23876 594.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 396.00 101 68010 220 1644 C C � CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T € R PAGE 6 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '"' Denotes Hand Written Checks 95514 MSM INC. 21856 890.09 MISC. SUPPLIES 890.09 527 66520 120 95515 VS GOLF LLC 21948 630.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 630.00 101 68010 220 1784 95516 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 21986 551.90 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 551.90 326 80770 210 95517 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 80.80 SUPPLIES 80.80 620 15000 95518 JCC , INC. 22157 7,190.46 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 7,190.46 527 66520 210 95519 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 648.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 369.58 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 278.42 527 66520 120 95520 HELENE RENE 22366 120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1660 95521 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. 22632 33.59 OFFICE EXPENSE 33.59 101 65200 110 95522 HOLDEN DANIEL$ 22687 703.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 703.00 101 65200 260 95523 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYST 22730 600.00 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 600.00 101 64420 210 95524 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 101.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.76 101 65100 120 95525 SAN MATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPAR 22943 9,216.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,216.00 101 65100 220 95526 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 95527 OFFICE TEAM 23256 969.85 MISCELLANEOUS 969.85 101 65300 010 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95499 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 367.50 COMMUNICATIONS 367.50 621 64450 160 95500 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 1,274.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,274.25 327 77040 210 95501 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 586.24 SUPPLIES 566.24 620 15000 95502 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 1,540.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,540.00 326 75170 210 95503 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 3,006.22 DEPOSIT REFUND 3,006.22 101 22590 95504 AARONSON, DICKERSON, COHN & 20798 9.87 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9.87 101 64350 210 95505 LAWRENCE S. MOY 20954 1,522.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,522.50 101 68010 220 1762 95506 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 765.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 101 68010 220 1331 95507 GEORGE SAGDON 21174 275.35 MISCELLANEOUS 275.35 101 66210 031 95508 CEB 21210 401.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 401.60 101 64350 120 95509 CDN GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 235.26 COMMUNICATIONS 78.28 101 65200 160 COMMUNICATIONS 156.98 621 64450 160 95510 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 265.75 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 265.75 101 65200 203 95511 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,802.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 840.75 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 840.75 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 840.75 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 280.25 619 64460 260 95512 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 193.12 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 193.12 621 64450 190 95513 MONICA EHLERS 21627 231.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.00 101 68010 220 1661 C CITY OF BURLINGAME ' W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 D4/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95484 JO CROSBY & ASSOCIATES 18077 8,117.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,117.00 320 80370 210 95485 PARAMOUNT'S GREAT AMERICA 18078 1,224.00 . CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,224.00 101 68010 220 1212 95486 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS 18389 119.56 MISC. SUPPLIES 119.56 101 64350 120 95487 RALF SINGER 18476 1,760.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,760.00 101 68010 220 1660 95488 VERI20N WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 76.99 COMMUNICATIONS 38.49 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 38.50 527 66520 160 95489 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 57.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 57.00 101 66100 240 95490 JJR CONSTRUCTION 18979 3,400.00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 3,400.00 526 69020 801 95491 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 218.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 218.36 101 65200 220 95492 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 286.52 MISC. SUPPLIES 286.52 326 80770 120 95493 SIX FLAGS MARINE WORLD 19119 1,759.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,759.20 101 68010 220 1212 95494 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 295.61 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 247.63 101 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 47.98 625 65213 203 95495 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 101 65200 220 95496 KATHY KARAS 19812 225.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.75 101 68010 220 1644 95497 CABRILLO PLUMBING 20115 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 95498 GE CAPITAL 20216 498.67 OFFICE EXPENSE 99.73 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 398.94 101 68010 220 1100 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95469 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 - 55.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 55.60 101 65200 111 95470 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 420.31 MISC. SUPPLIES 420.31 527 66520 120 95471 THE 14AGIC PRESS CORP. 13759 237.07 OFFICE EXPENSE 237.07 101 65100 110 95472 A T & T 13940 22.96 COMMUNICATIONS 22.96 621 64450 160 95473 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 464.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR - 464.00 527 66520 230 95474 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 20.57 BLDG. & GROUNDS MA1NT. 20.57 101 68020 190 2200 95475 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP. 15055 346.22 MISCELLANEOUS 346.22 101 22585 95476 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,771.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,771.00 101 68010 220 1787 95477 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 3.79 OFFICE EXPENSE 3.79 101 65100 110 95478 TEAM CLEAN 15827 233.48 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233.48 101 65200 220 95479 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 794.32 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 794.32 101 68020 140 2200 95480 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 573.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 536.29 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 37.50 526 69020 120 95481 OTTO MILLER 17129 4,100.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 4,100.00 101 22520 95482 PRIDE PAINT 17414 23.80 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 23.80 101 68020 190 2200 95483 COLORPRINT 17497 126.65 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.65 101 66210 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95455 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 73.08 SUPPLIES 73.08 620 15000 95456 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 1,169.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,169.30 526 69020 120 \ 95457 MEG MONROE 02936 813.42 MISCELLANEOUS 813.42 101 64400 031 95458 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 450.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 450.32 730 69560 120 95459 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 347.89 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 161.17 101 65200 203 SUPPLIES 60.79 620 15000 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 125.93 625 65213 203 95460 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,084.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 564.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,520.00 101 68010 220 1644 95461 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 1,068.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,068.75 101 68010 220 1641 95462 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 4,720.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,720.00 528 66600 120 95463 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 882.88 MISC. SUPPLIES 528.62 101 64350 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 354.26 101 64350 210 95464 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 1,071.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,071.00 .101 68010 220 1891 95465 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 95466 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 16,208.62 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 15,611.91 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 596.71 618 64520 601 95467 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 140.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140.00 101 66210 220 95468 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 225.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 101 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 04/12/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 95442 WHITE CAP 01250 227.55 SMALL TOOLS 25.00 101 66210 130 SMALL TOOLS 202.55 527 66520 130 95443 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 76.55 MISC. SUPPLIES 76.55 101 66210 120 95444 BRENTON SAFETY, INC. 01400 865.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 865.13 527 66520 120 95445 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01624 6,272.92 MISCELLANEOUS 2,200.00 101 68010 114 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 910.39 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,700.00 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 481.53 101 68010 120 1212 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 981.00 101 68010 220 1212 \ 95446 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 970.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 970.00 101 10700 95447 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,304.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,304.00 101 68010 220 1644 95448 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., 01992 677.64 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 677.64 101 64400 210 95449 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 974.25 MISC. SUPPLIES 974.25 101 65200 111 95450 VEOLIA WATER 02110 45,195.90 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 36,322.54 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 8,506.55 527 66530 190 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 366.81 527 66530 800 95451 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 369.22 MISCELLANEOUS 369.22 101 68020 192 2200 95452 N.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 301.16 MISC. SUPPLIES, 63.07 101 66210 120 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 188.59 101 65200 203 SMALL TOOLS 49.50 620 66700 130 95453 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 737.32 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 737.32 101 66210 226 95454 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 548.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 548.75 528 66600 210 BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY Burlingame Public Library Board of Trustees Minutes April 27, 2004 I. Call to Order Secretary Cecile Coar called the meeting to order at 4:30pm. II. Roll Call Trustees Present: Dave Carr, Cecile Coar, Mary Herman, Catherine McCormack, Carol Rossi Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder III. Warrants and Special Funds The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants. M/ S/C (Herman/Carr) IV. Minutes The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the March 16, 2004 meeting. M/ S/C (Rossi/Coar) V. Correspondence and Attachments A. Monthly Statistics - It was duly noted and corrected that the percentage difference in the circulation grand total for March 2004, in comparison with the March 2003, total should be an increase of 42% instead of a decrease of 42%. As of July 1St, Jan Eustis will provide Outreach statistics. B. Security Cameras - Two cameras have been installed in the entry hall, one on the lower level over the desk and one on the upper level by the fireplace. It is hoped that the presence of the cameras will deter vandalism, as well as unauthorized removal of library materials. Signs have been posted to advise the patrons of the cameras presence; audio features are not in use. VI. From the Floor None 480 Primrose Road . Burlingame • CA 94010-4083 Phone (650) 558-7474 ' Fax (65o) 342-6295 VII. Reports A. City Librarians Report - Highlights of Report 1 . Easton Renovation - All exterior walls have been reframed due to significant dry rot. The windows are scheduled to be installed the first week of May. Trustee Rossi suggested contacting the City regarding the physical condition of the large Eucalyptus tree in front of the library to determine if it could be considered a safety hazard. 2. Easton Donors - Only a few of the Easton donors responded to the Easton construction update letter sent by the City Librarian last month, in which he offered to e-mail current updates on the project. Trustee Coar noted that to her knowledge the letter had been well received. 3. Budget - The budget will go to the Council in May and there will be a study session June lst. Pat Harding, Library Services Manager, will attend this meeting in Al's absence. Three eligible staff members have expressed an interest in the Golden Handshake. B. Foundation Report - The next meeting will be held this Thursday, April 29th. 1 . Easton Book Collection - The Executive Board will recommend approving $30,000 for Easton's Opening Day Collection to the full Board at the general meeting. 2. Easton Opening - Plans are in the works for an afternoon opening day event oriented towards families. An earlier event will be held for major donors who supported the Easton Campaign. Trustee Coar suggested that the Mayor of Hillsborough and the Hillsborough City Council be invited to attend the opening. C Literacy Through Music- - Trustee McCormack attended this workshop, which emphasized how music can promote learning. Trustee McCormack recommended that the presenters of this event, Cotton Candy Express, be invited to the library for a children's program or the Easton opening. Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2 April 27, 2004 VIII. Unfinished Business A. Evans and Brown Mural - Evans and Brown has agreed to sketch a sample mural with the understanding that a fee of$1,000 will be charged if the library decides not to proceed with the idea of having a permanent art work. Trustee Rossi recommended that a sketch be viewed before a final decision is made. Trustee Coar made a motion to proceed with the sketch and then upon completion of the preliminary drawing make a decision as to whether or not to proceed with the mural. M/S/C (Coar/Carr) B. Increase Scope of Outreach Program - The City Librarian expressed his concern regarding the expansion of the Outreach Program due to possible staff reductions as a result of budget deficits and recommended waiting until next year. Trustee Rossi advised that the first step is to find volunteers as the potential recipients of the program are already in place. Featuring the program in the Foundation newsletter is a vehicle to inform patrons of this service. The Trustees agreed to revisit this topic in the future. IX. New Business The Trustees unanimously approved the motion to cancel their May 18th meeting due to vacation schedules. M/S/C (Herman/Rossi) A formal notice of the cancellation of the May meeting will be sent to City Hall for posting. X. Announcements City Librarian, Al Escoffier, Trustees Herman and McCormack will plan to attend the Legislative Breakfast to be held April 24, 2004. XI. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:30pm. The next meeting of the Library Trustees will be held June 15, 2004 at 4:30pm in the Library Conference Room. M/S/C (Carr/Herman) Respectfully Submitted, Alfred H. Escoffier City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3 April 27, 2004 BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION June 3, 2004 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Hesselgren. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Hesselgren,Commissioners Carney, Grandcolas,Lauder,McQuaide and Webb Absent: Commissioner Ellis Staff: Parks Superintendent Richmond, Arborist Porter, and Administrative Secretary Harvey Guests: Bobbi Benson,Mr. and Mrs. John Campos (212 Stanley) MINUTES Minutes were corrected to read , Stephen Hamilton, and Dan Andersen. Under Correspondence, should read,Letter to Alane L. O'Rielly Weber. Under From the Floor, the last paragraph/last sentence should read, Chairperson Hesselgren thanked Ms. Benson for her comments and suggested she contact the Burlingame Improvement Committee for volunteer activities related to her interests. The minutes were approved as corrected. CORRESPONDENCE Letter to Richard and Nina Hoskinson, 1915 Broadway,from Superintendent Richmond informing them that the Commission denied their appeal(5 -2(absent)to remove a protected Cedar tree at their address because the tree is healthy and concerns could be mitigated by root pruning and trimming of the tree. Utility Tree Trimming Committee Report- Goal/Issue/Objectives/Information Resources. Memo from Superintendent Richmond regarding a nonaction discussion item:Evaluating Sidewalk Damage to be discussed at the June Yd Commission meeting. Letter from John F. Campos, 212 Stanley Road, appealing the denial to remove a City owned Liriondendron at his address. Applicant's request is based on concerns that: the tree leans toward the house,the roots have displaced the sidewalk and is causing problems with plumbing and possibly the main sewer line; due to the structure of the root system and the tree's close proximity to the driveway, the City is unable to effectively deal with the aphid problem leaving their cars "swamped" with a sticky solution from March through September. Letter to John F. Campos, 212 Stanley Road, from Superintendent Richmond informing Mr. Campos that the Commission will review the appeal of the denial to remove a City owned Liriodendron tree at the June 3rd Commission meeting. Staff Report to the Commission from Superintendent Richmond regarding the Appeal of the Denial to Remove a City owned Liriodendron tree at 212 Stanley. FROM THE FLOOR- Bobbi Benson stated that Molly Stone's grocery store on Chapin Avenue has mulched and planted the planters on the El Camino side of their business and that, the Safeway grocery store on Howard Avenue is doing abetter job at picking up the litter. She stated that her next task will be to ask the Bank of America on the South side of Chapin Avenue to consider doing some planting as well. With the Commission's permission, Chairperson Hesselgren then moved the agenda to NEW BUSINESS to accommodate the applicants from 212 Stanley Road. 1 NEW BUSINESS - Cancellation of the July 3" Beautification Commission Meeting - Due to the July 4' Holiday it was moved and approved to cancel the July 3" Commission meeting. Appeal of the Denial to Remove a City owned Liriodendron Tree ( 212 Stanley Road -Referencing his staff report to the Commission, Superintendent Richmond stated that the Liriodendron trees on Stanley Road have been treated over the years for aphid infestation and treatments are usually repeated. He added that a fair amount of success has been experienced by using the soil injection method of applying Merit pesticide which goes through the roots and then to the branches and leaves. He noted that the Liriodendron's on Stanley Road were once designated as a heritage grove, but the current ordinance does not reference that designation. He stated that a couple of neighbors (who also have a Liriodendron tree in front of their homes) called into the Parks office and commented that, if aphids and sidewalk damage was the only basis for the request for removal, they believed that should not be enough justification to approve removal of the tree. Superintendent Richmond continued that there are two Liriodendron trees at this address, because one tree is so close to the driveway and the root mass of the both trees, the injection method at this address is more difficult and the controls less effective; but Supervisor Disco inspected the trees today and found no evidence of aphids at this time. The City Arborist has denied past requests to remove the one tree closest to the driveway, but now has suggested the property owners appeal his decision to the Commission. Commissioner Webb stated that it appears on the one tree that the exterior bark is rotting, that the tree is leaning and has heavy limbs on that side. Arborist Porter stated that the trees in the City are on a 4 year pruning cycle and pruning to lighten the one side will eliminate any concern; the rot on the exterior of the bark is of no concern. He continued that many trees lean,but it does not necessarily mean they will fall; this particular tree has grown with a lean and recent inspection did not indicate any current upheaving of the turf. Arborist Porter stated that some year's the aphids are worse than others. This tree is very close to the driveway and has been headed back to keep the overhang back from the driveway. Commissioner Carney stated that she noticed that the curb is split and was concerned removal could set a precedent. Arborist Porter responded that the Liriodendron tree is a large specie in a small planting strip and curb and sidewalk damage will be occurring on the whole block of Stanley Road. Commissioner Grandcolas asked Arborist Porter if the roots were causing damage to the sewer and the plumbing? Arborist Porter responded no, not to his knowledge. Commissioner McQuaide asked if removal were approved would the tree be replaced? Arborist Porter responded that a smaller specie could be planted but would not be required because the current minimum spacing requirements would be exceeded. The Commission then discussed who would be responsible for the cost of removal, options to mitigate the aphid honeydew drop, as well as the Merit injection process. Arborist Porter responded that the area for injection has very little surface available to inject the Merit,thereby making it difficult to get enough material to be effective for the aphid control. Chairperson Hesselgren then recognized the applicant,John Campos.Mr. Campos stated he has lived at 212 Stanley for nine years; the two City owned Liriodendron trees "rain" sticky stuff from the aphids and the flowers as well as black stuff. The leaning of the tree has been a big concern because it leans toward the house and he has concern for his children and family. He added that using a car cover is not practical because it gets sticky. He commented that he is only requesting the removal of the one tree by the driveway if approved he would like a Gingko tree planted or something smaller that has yellow leaves in the Fall. 2 Appeal of the Denial to Remove a City owned Liriodendron Tree (a, 212 Stanley Road - (Contd.) Mrs. Campos commented that they have been living with this problem for years;the repeated Merit injections are not effective;the car doors get stuck shut,the sidewalk and walkway to the house is sticky causing leaves to stick to shoes and getting tracked into the house. Commissioner Grandcolas stated that this tree is a beautiful tree, currently there is little damage to the curb and sidewalk, unlike others on the block that are "spilling" over the curbs. He commented that though unlikely,if removal of this tree was approved,other residents experiencing similar problems might be inclined to request removal of their trees. Commissioner Carney suggested that since there is no evidence of aphids on the trees at this time, and the aphid infestation is generally worse in June, the Commission could delay their decision to see if the Merit injection has been effective. Following further discussion, Commissioner McQuaide moved that the decision on this appeal be tabled to the August S'meeting to evaluate the effectiveness of the current Merit injection process throughout the summer, seconded Motion carried 6- 0- I (Absent/Ellis). Chairperson Hesselgren thanked the applicants for their comments, that the appeal would be placed on the August 5a'agenda for further discussion, and asked the applicants to please contact the Parks Division when the aphids appear. Chairperson Hesselgren excused herself to attend a graduation and Commissioner Carney continued the meeting as Acting Chair. Discussion of Criteria Used for Tree Related Sidewalk Damage - Superintendent Richmond explained the Council recently passed as ordinance revision giving responsibility to property owners for the repair of sidewalks fronting their property and though not yet confirmed, property owners may be able to take advantage of reduced costs of repairs through City contracted sidewalk contractors. Superintendent Richmond stated he is presenting a case study of an approved removal by the City Arborist of a City tree that was causing significant sidewalk damage so the Commission can discuss with Arborist Porter the criteria used for making this decision. Arborist Porter informed the Commission of his criteria and considerations he uses when evaluating requests for tree removals due to "sidewalk damage": 1)Branching structure of tree, 2)Whether decay or injury or root problems exist, 3) Concentration on right species for the particular location, 4) The degree of damage (serious/significant) to curb, sidewalk, or driveway, 5) The tree's proximity to the driveway, 6) Whether root pruning can mitigate future damage without compromising stability of the tree, 7)Whether topping of the tree has occurred for utilities has resulted in structural problems, and 8)Whether or not the tree belongs in the size planter strip. The Commission discussed further. Commissioner Lauder expressed her concern that citizens being required to pay for sidewalk repair will impact City tree removals. Arborist Porter said it is a different way of thinking; liability for the sidewalks is still the City's but the property owner will be responsible for the repairs. Superintendent Richmond noted that he would check with the Public Works Department to see if an engineer would speak to the Commission at a future meeting regarding sidewalk repair procedures. 3 OLD BUSINESS Committee Reports - Utility Tree Trimming Committee - Commissioner McQuaide reported that she spoke with several real estate offices and received feedback about possible ways of informing Realtors and new homeowners of City tree ordinances and policies. The Committee will meet and discuss the suggestions and report back to the Commission at a future meeting. REPORTS - Superintendent Richmond - 1. City Budget will be considered by Council at its next two meetings. A Council Study Session was held on Tuesday, June 1 st. 2. One ofHelen D'Arcy's children, Sandy,met with Supervisor Bob Disco and myself to discuss funding the replanting of the Fragrance Garden area. Bob is working on a planting plan. It might be another potential volunteer maintenance project. 3. Reminded the Commission to watch the progress of the volunteer planting project on the Avenue. The group will return in August to evaluate the project for possible expansion. 4. The PG&E Arborist whom Steve had hoped to have as a guest at a future meeting, has been transferred. She is checking with her supervisor regarding the possibility of making a presentation despite the change. Commissioner Lauder - Reported that she attended the Citizens for a Better Burlingame forum. She reported that the plants in front of Copenhagen and La Scala Restaurants on Burlingame Avenue are doing well and a new cherry tree had been planted in the planter in front of Copenhagen. Commissioner Lauder reported that she and Nancy Locke scattered poppy seeds, are propagating the ice plants at the 101/13roadway triangle, and that they had received a donation of 12 petite salmon pink Oleanders to be planted in the area. She stated that they noticed the area around the Willow tree is very dry and have reported that to Ray Fox of CalTrans to investigate if there are problems with the irrigation. There being no further business, Acting Chair Carney adjourned the meeting at 7:15 pm. Respectfully submitted, Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary 4 ell The City of Burlingame CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 10, 2004 Commissioners Present: Russ Cohen, Chair Stephen Warden, Vice Chair Eugene Condon Commissioners Absent: Victor James Jim McIver Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer,Public Works Sgt. Dawn Cutler,Police Department Doris Mortensen,Administrative Secretary, Public Works Staff Absent: None Visitors: Joan Cleary, 1337 Cabrillo Avenue,Burlingame Mary Ann Martinez, 1321 Cabrillo Avenue, Burlingame Norm Utigard, 1252 Paloma Avenue,Burlingame Ron Field, 1249 Paloma Avenue,Burlingame Alice Wei, 1513 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame Ken Wei, 1513 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame Tourag Ecco, 322 Lorton Avenue,Burlingame TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 10, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:05 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 3 of 5 Commissioners present. 4. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSIONER Mr. Chou announced that the new commissioner, Victor James, was absent this evening due to medical reasons. He added that Commissioner James sent his regrets and plans to attend starting next month. 5. CURRENT BUSINESS. 5.1 ACTION ITEMS. 5.1.1 Approval of Minutes for May 13, 2004 It was moved and seconded (Comms. Condon/Warden) to approve the May 13, 2004 minutes; approved by voice vote, 3-0-2 (Comms. James and McIver absent). 5.1.2 Evaluation of sight-visibility at the intersection of Palm Drive and California Drive Mr. Chou reviewed alternatives as discussed last month. After discussion, it was moved and seconded (Comms. Warden/Condon) to install a red zone for the first two spaces north of Palm Drive on the west side of California Drive and to post a 6-foot height limitation sign at the north end of the red zone, effective up to 75 feet from the sign; approved by voice vote, 3-0-2 (Comms. James and McIver absent). 5.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS. 5.2.1 Evaluate on-street parking situation on 1300 block of Cortez Avenue and Cabrillo Avenue Comm. Condon summarized the meeting that he and Chair Cohen facilitated at Our Lady of Angels (OLA) to discuss the parking situation there. Alternatives addressed were school hour changes, usage of the upper playground during special events, parental volunteer traffic enforcement, and parking zones on Cabrillo Avenue and Cortez Avenue. He concluded that they expect two more meetings at OLA before school begins on August 24 to further work on a viable solution. The next meeting is scheduled for July 12 at 7 p.m. at OLA. 5.2.2 Request for 2-hour parking time limit for 1200 block of Paloma Avenue Vice Chair Warden summarized the recent meeting that he, Mr. Chou and Sgt. Cutler had with Ross Bruce of the Broadway Improvement District and local residents to discuss time limit changes in the nearby parking lots. As a result of that meeting, it was agreed upon by those attending that some of the 10-hour parking spaces should be restored in each of the three nearby City parking lots (Lots P, Q, and I). The City of Burlingame Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 10, 2004 From the floor, Mr. Field stated that he was concerned that most drivers won't pay for 10-hour parking if free, unlimited parking is still offered on this block. He requested a 2-hour time limit be restored on the west side of Paloma between Broadway and Lincoln Avenue. Mr. Utigard stated that he disagreed with his neighbor on this issue since he lives on the west side of Paloma. Chair Cohen asked what measure would be taken to educate the public and merchants of the change in some meters back to 10 hours. Comm. Warden stated that Mr. Bruce would notify BID members of the change. Mr. Chou added that he would include updated information in the next printing order for the Broadway Parking Guide brochure. Comm. Condon asked about incentives for merchants/employees to park in the 10-hour spaces. Mr. Chou stated that his understanding from BID was that the majority of merchants and employees would rather pay to park in the 10- hour spaces,rather than encounter disgruntled residents on Paloma Avenue. Comm. Warden asked about marked parking spaces on Paloma Avenue. Mr. Chou explained that marked spaces can change the public perception of an area from residential to one of commercial. It was moved and seconded (Comms. Warden/Condon)to make this an Action Item immediately. It was then moved and seconded (Comms. Wardens to recommend to Council to restore 10-hour parking spaces with the appropriate rates in three City parking lots: Lot P, all spaces at the north end; Lot Q, one-half of all spaces on the east side; and Lot Y, all spaces at the south end, and to deny the request for installing a 2-hour parking time limit on Paloma Avenue; both actions approved by voice vote, 3-0-2 (Comms. James and McIver absent). Mr. Chou stated that this recommendation to Council will require funding to purchase and install new 10-hour meter heads. 5.2.3 Request for passenger loading zone at 322 Lorton Avenue Mr. Chou stated that providing a passenger loading zone at this site would require removing metered parking spaces; therefore, staff recommends denial of this request. He also stated that staff was willing to work with the business on after-hours use,but could not recommend installing a passenger loading zone while parking meters were present. Vice Chair Warden stated that Il Fomaio's valet parking is available to patrons of other businesses. From the floor, Mr. Ecco stated that many of his clients are elderly and have trouble walking any distances. He suggested that the meters remain for day use and have a sign added to the spaces designating the spaces as a passenger loading zone after 6 p.m. Mr. Chou stated that a driver may legally park at the meter in front of the restaurant before 6 p.m., and they could remain parked there after 6 p.m. legally for free. There is no cause or requirement for them to move. He also stated that any added enforcement in this area would be difficult for the short-staffed police force. Sgt. Cutler suggested his patrons use the passenger loading zone at Starbucks which is nearby, and just south of the restaurant. Mr.Ecco stated that the Starbucks' To Go customers occupy that space almost exclusively. It was moved and seconded(Comms. Condon/Warden)to make this an Action Item immediately. It was then moved and seconded (Comms. Condon/Warden) to deny this request; both motions approved by voice vote, 3-0-2 (Comms. James and McIver absent). The City of Burlingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 10, 2004 5.2.4 Request for parking height-restrictions at the intersections of Oak Grove/Neuchatel Road and at Palm Avenue/Neuchatel Road Mr. Chou stated that removal of parking spaces on Oak Grove is a critical issue since this is a high-density residential area in need of parking spaces. He added that height limit signs were usually for large streets with high-volume traffic. Oak Grove is in a residential area. Mr. Chou explained that the traffic signal at California Drive creates intervals for breaks in traffic; and that the traffic situation was not very different from other streets around the city. Therefore, staff does not recommend height limit signs. It was moved and seconded(Comms. Condon/Cohen)to make this item an Action Item immediately. It was then moved and seconded (Comms. Condon/Warden) to deny this request; both motions approved by voice vote, 3-0-2 (Comms. James and McIver absent). 5.2.5 Request for various improvements to Parking Lot H and 1513 Burlingame Avenue Mr. Chou stated that the applicant's property abuts Lot H, a free parking lot. He stated that the applicant's issues included City foliage and trees that had been cut back eliminating some of their privacy, nighttime activities and related debris left in the parking lot, and a request to install handicap spaces in the City lot in locations opposite their property. Mr. Chou explained that the City would consider adding two handicap spaces when funds are available and if there is a clear need for them; however, placement would be dependent on what would be considered optimal access for handicapped individuals. He added that enforcement is done by the police on nighttime activities. He stated that debris concerns could be addressed with the possibility of adding "No Littering" signs. Mr. Chou concluded that he was waiting to hear from the Parks Department on the foliage trimming issue. He suggested that the applicant consider planting foliage on their property or in some way provide their own privacy screening as well. From the floor, Mr. & Mrs. Wei said the problem started when Lot H became a free lot 24 hours a day. They said that they are awakened in the middle of the night when people start their cars or when there are altercations. They also expressed concern over debris often being left in the lot. This will be a Discussion Item next month. 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. None. 7. FROM THE FLOOR. None. 8. INFORMATION ITEMS. 8.1 From Staff to Commission 8.1.1 Traffic Engineer's Report 8.1.1.1 US 101 Auxiliary Lane/Soundwall Project Mr. Chou stated that a 16-foot soundwall was approved by Council at their June 7" meeting. The soundwall will start at Corbitt Drive and end 100 feet north of Toyon. Mr. Chou explained The City of Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, June 10, 2004 that he also sent a letter to the Transportation Authority advising them of the City's preference regarding the design of the end of the soundwall at Toyon. 8.1.1.2 Parking meter poles along California Drive Mr. Chou stated that since these poles are not being used for meters, and have not been used for some time,he would be issuing work orders to have the poles removed;thus creating a safer pedestrian environment along California Drive from about Howard Avenue south. 8.2 From Commission to Staff 8.2.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests Sgt. Cutler stated that she referred the unlicensed limousine business at Farringdon and Palm to the Code Enforcement Officer. 8.2.2 Comments and Communication Sgt. Cutler submitted the Selective Enforcement report. 8.2.3 Expected absences of Commissioners at the Thursday,July 8, 2004 meeting Comm. Condon stated that he may be absent next month. 8.3 Bicycle Safety Issues in Burlingame Chair Cohen stated that this committee had their first meeting; and the next meeting is scheduled for June 24, 2004. 9. INACTIVE ITEMS. None. 10. AGENDIZE FOR THE NEXT MEETING. 5.2.1 to Discussion Item 5.2.5 to Discussion Item 11. ADJOURNMENT. 8:43 p.m. The City of Burlingame Page 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA June 14, 2004 7:00 P.M. `- Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the June 14, 2004, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Keighran, Keele, Bojues (arrived 7:05 p.m.) Absent: Commissioners: Osterling, Vistica Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber; City Attorney, Larry Anderson. III. MINUTES The minutes of the May 24, 2004 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that item number four, 1440 Capuchino Avenue, is continued to the June 28, 2004 meeting. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. 'VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1035 CHULA VISTA AVENUE,ZONED R-2 -APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCE FOR A RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY (SANDRA B. JIMENEZ, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MARK DELEON AND RENATO MERCADO, PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commission asked if this proposal requires a use permit. CA Anderson noted that the state law allows a residential care facility of six or fewer people to function in an R-1 zone with the same standards as a single family dwelling. This pre-emption is only for 6 or fewer residents. Commission asked if they could place conditions on the proposed use even though they are only asking for a parking variance request. CA Anderson noted that if the applicant is willing to accept the conditions, however usually the project is looked at only as a single family dwelling parking variance. CP Monroe noted that facility will have to be licensed by the State,and must meet all of the State standards, including the distance between such residential care facilities. Commission asked if they can require that the variance be voided if the house reverts back to a single family dwelling. CA Anderson responded no, because the variance stays with the property. Commission asked if a condition could be added that would require yearly review of the variance. CA Anderson stated that a condition requiring yearly review of the variance for compliance with the conditions of approval by the Commission can be included as part of the approval. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 Commissioners asked: • Staff report notes that residents won't own or drive vehicles,but can not use this asjustification for a variance because house can revert back to a single family dwelling; what is the hardship on the property; • What are extraordinary circumstances to justify parking variance; • Staff report notes that lot coverage is at 39.9%, notes applicant states that two-car garage would result in less useable space,however it would require either a lot coverage variance,or require that the application reduce the size of the house to meet the parking required, these are options, so the open space comment is not a valid argument,should look at reducing house and providing parking; • Consider adding bedrooms upstairs with an elevator, that way there would be enough room for a two-car garage; • For the parking variance,what extraordinary circumstances apply to this property that don't apply to others in the area; • Even though the residents won't be driving, concerned with parking and the number of visitors coming to the site along with the two employees and deliveries,this is an intense use. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m. 2. 620 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A LONG-TERM AIRPORT PARKING INTERIM USE (PAUL SALISBURY, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, BOCA LAKE OFFICE, INC., PROPERTY OWNER)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN —� CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. There were no questions of staff. Commissioners asked: • On page 5 of the report there are recommendations that are not included in the project, but they should be included in the conditions of approval; • Plans are missing landscape detail,pedestrian shelter and median work,need to see these items on plan; • Nothing on plan shows how this parking facility will work; • Will the applicant be meeting with the City Arborist prior to the next Planning Commission meeting, need to work out landscape details; • How many days will the cars be staying; • How many cars will be stored on-site each day and what daily turn over is expected? This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 3a. 344 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCE FOR NUMBER OF COVERED PARKING SPACES TO BUILD A NEW DETACHED ONE-CAR GARAGE (ELIZABETH YOST, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; TRICIA HAGEY, ARCHITECT) (45 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER 3b. 1409 CHAPIN AVENUE,ZONED C-1,SUBAREA A—APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR REAL ESTATE USE (JOSE DOS RAMOS, PRUDENTIAL REALTY, APPLICANT; KEVIN CULLINANE ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) (47 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER 3c. 220 CLARENDON ROAD,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; MARGARET FARNEY, PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Acting Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. C. Bojues moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Acting Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 5-0-2 (Cers. Osterling and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. 'III. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 4. 1440 CAPUCHINO AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND SPECIAL PERMITS TO BUILD A NEW DETACHED TANDEM GARAGE (JAMES BREEN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;RANDY GRANGE,ARCHITECT)(79 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CONTINUED TO JUNE 28,2004 MEETING 5. 750 WALNUT AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (TOM WOO,APPLICANT;ASI,ARCHITECT;FITALI RUSLI AND JAJE DU,PROPERTY OWNERS) (71 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report June 14,2004,with attachments. Plr. Barber presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if the plans submitted for this application are identical to the plans approved by the Commission in October 2002. Staff responded yes, the plans are identical. Commission requested staff in the future to add the lot size on the summary table. There were no further questions of staff. Acting Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Tom Woo,project applicant,explained that the project was already approved but the property owner was doing business overseas and did not build it. When he returned he instructed Mr.Woo to get a building permit and that is when he found out that the approvals had expired. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 C. Keighran noting that the project has not changed, she approved it originally and with the same findings moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall bF built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 10,2004,sheets Al - A6 and L-1, including that all windows shall be divided light wood windows with wood trim and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3)that the conditions of the City Engineer, Recycling Specialist, Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal's memos dated May 17, 2004, shall be met; 4) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; 5)that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s)and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 8)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 9)that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staffwill inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10)that the owner is responsible for --� implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures detailed in the Arborist's Report date stamped June 13,2002; 11)that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 12)that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477,Exterior Illumination Ordinance 9;and that no exterior light fixture shall produce a cone of light that extends beyond the property boundaries;and 13)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code,2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Keele. Comment on the motion: Have already reviewed this project,identical plans as before;new building code regulations will apply to this project. Acting Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Osterling and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:27 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 6. 1608 MARCO POLO WAY, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(SERGIO GUTIERREZ, S &A CONSTRUCTION,APPLICANT; JOSE GUADAMUZ, DESIGNER; LUIS AND MIRIAM BONILLA, PROPERTY OWNERS) (72 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Plnr. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commission asked staff to clarify the front setback, summary table shows 157" as the existing first floor front setback, but the proposed is 20'2". Staff explained that the existing front setback to the garage is 157',',but that the new bay window on the first floor 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 will change that part of the existing front setback and it will become 20'2" from the front property line. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Auran opened the public comment. Luis Bonilla, property owner, Joe Guardamuz, project designer, were available to answer questions. Owner stated that he has lived in the area for 10 years, and finally can do a remodel,wants to comply with all the regulations. Commission asked where the front door is located,Mr.Bonilla explained that it is currently located on the left side of the house. Commission noted that they did a great job,like the fact that the door is coming toward the front of the house now,note that the project is right at the limit for FAR,is it not farther forward because of the FAR limit,would like to see door moved forward even more. Project architect stated that yes, the FAR limited what could be done on this project. Marco Avilla, 1604 Marco Polo Way,neighbor to the proposed project. Has no objection and is in support of the proposal. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Uncovered deck off of the master bedroom is too large,concerned with neighbors privacy,especially the neighbors at the rear on Lassen Way; • Plans note shrubs at the rear property line,what will height be,note on plans; • Need to add articulation and break up the left elevation, looks like a box on the house, consider adding a window on that wall in the master bedroom, design will look better with a window on the left; • New plate heights are 9' for both floors,would like to see second floor plate dropped to at least 8'6"; • Would like to see front porch brought forward,will be a good design improvement,may need to take that square footage off somewhere else on the house, to stay within the FAR; • All windows should be trued divided light windows; and • Look at improving floor plan for master bedroom and master bathroom. C.Keighran made a motion to send this proj ect to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Bojues. Comment on motion: if continued item and changes were made and project came back and Planning Commission didn't like it the review would take longer than going directly to design reviewer;project will benefit from design review; nice design, is an improvement over the existing. Acting Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this project to design review. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Cers. Osterling and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:51 p.m. 7. 2310 RAY DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FLOOR AREA RATIO AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (BILL WALTERS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; GARY AND DEBORAH VEILBAUM, PROPERTY OWNERS) (59 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Plnr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 Acting Chair Auran opened the public comment. Gary Vielbaum,property owner was available to answer questions,noted architect was not available to attend meeting. Commission asked how many cars can fit in the existing garage,the property owner stated that two cars can fit in the garage,but currently they are only parking one car in the garage. Commission asked the property owner to elaborate on the hardship for the FAR variance,why is the project over the maximum allowable size. The property owner explained that the property is unique because it is located on a corner, the footprint won't be changing,just adding another story, in order to meet required setbacks would have to pull in second story and would not work right aesthetically. Commission asked what the plate heights are and the property owner did not know. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Concerned with FAR variance, house is over in volume; • Add supports under bay window so it ties in to the structure and isn't jutting out at a right angle; • Show plate heights on drawings; • Why such a variety of materials; • Would like staff to look at setback requirements and the impacts on code exceptions if the frontage is considered to be Ray Drive; • Would like to see picture with two cars parked in the garage; and • Elaborate on the hardship on the property for FAR variance. C. Bojues made a motion to continue this item to the next design review study meeting. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Commission discussion: could continue this item to the next design review study meeting so that the architect can be present to answer questions; could send on to a design reviewer,that may save time rather than have the applicant come back to study and then end up sending it to design review; not in favor of motion do not want to see the applicant delayed,either send to design review or take away FAR variance and come back as an action item;see hardship on this property because it is a corner lot with an attached garage, which reduces FAR; architect should listen to hearing tapes or read minutes to understand Commission direction; no justification for FAR variance, so unless it goes away, will vote no on this project, need to make changes an then come back. C. Bojues amended his motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. C. Keighran, the second on the motion, agreed to the amendment. Action Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Cers. Osterling and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:12 p.m. 8. 446 CUMBERLAND DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(EARLE WEISS,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; MICHAEL DARDIA AND SARAH LUBMAN, PROPERTY OWNERS) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 Acting Chair Auran opened the public comment. Earle Weiss,project architect,noted that this building is a challenge to add onto because it is difficult to connect all of the different split levels. The existing garage is very small and there is a narrow substandard stairway into the house that makes is difficult to maneuver on especially when you are bringing in groceries,right now it is easier to park outside. Even with revising the stairs to the code minimum the garage won't meet the required parking dimension,need a variance. Tried to articulate the roof and use true divided light wood windows to match the existing finishes. Wanted this addition to visually connect with the rest of the house. The only comments the neighbors had on this project was that they didn't want the new trees located too close to the property line. Commission asked if the windows on the north elevation will match the rest of the house. The project architect noted that there is a tall hedge on this side and the windows are not visible from off of the property, so to save money are not proposing to change these windows,eventually they may be replaced to match,but that is not in the scope of work for this project. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The Commission had the following comments: • Noted that the front elevation does not show the steps; • A lot of work being done to the front, need to put new windows on the front of the house, should match; • Need to do some work on the garage door,need to dress up. C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the revisions have been made and plan checked and there is space on an agenda. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on motion: O.K.with narrower garage,bringing it closer to conformance;adding character to the front of the house,will look nice. Acting Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Cers. Osterling and Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:23 p.m. 9. 2108 EASTON DRIVE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT, FLOOR AREA RATIO AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A NEW ATTACHED GARAGE (ERNIE AND PHYLLIS BODEN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; 2 STUDIO ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (53 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Acting Chair Auran recused himself because he lives within 500 feet of the property. C. Brownrigg took over as Acting Chair. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Ernie and Phyllis Boden, property owners were present to answer questions. They have lived in the house for 21 years. When they moved to the property in 1982 the Redwood tree was already leaning into the garage,which was built in the 1920's. Now the tree is lifting up the floor of the existing garage. When they added on to the house in 1989 they got a variance and kept the garage. Now they are proposing to build a new one car attached garage away from the tree. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 14, 2004 Commission asked the applicants if they were will to remove the entire garage, do not see a hardship for having the shed and being over on floor area. The property owners noted that they did not want to remove the shed and that is was necessary for garden storage. The proposed garage is only a one car garage and does not provide storage area, even if the shed were removed the project would still be over on floor area. Commission noted concern with one foot side setback and asked the property owners if they spoke with the neighbor at 2112 Easton. The property owners noted that they did show the neighbors at 2112 Easton Drive the plans and that they signed off on the design and submitted her approval in writing to the Planning Department. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Keighran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Keele. Comment on the motion: It is a hardship to move the garage but not to keep the shed, shed should be removed, it is an amenity that is not necessary; see hardship for both, the tree affects the entire property; support the proj ect and commend the applicant for making the site better by preserving the tree; concerned with side setback;CA Anderson noted that with the detached garage the property owners were allowed more square footage on their lot, but with an attached garage they are losing square footage, also noted that a condition can be added to the approval that the variance goes with the tree and structure, so that if the tree goes away the variance goes away and if the structure goes away the variance goes away. Acting Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 3-1-1-2 (C. Bojues dissenting, C. Auran abstaining, Cers. Osterling and C. Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable.This item concluded at 8:37 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of June 7, 2004. CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of June 7,2004. She also discussed briefly the schedule for reviewing the Peninsula Hospital project and the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. Ending Planning Commission Stipend CP Monroe noted that at the end of the June,end of the budget year,the Commission's stipend will end. Xl. ADJOURNMENT Action Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 8:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Michael Brownrigg, Secretary —� S AM INUTES\06.14.04.unapproved 8 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2004 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF&County Pool 26,351,524.97 26.351,524 97 26,351,524.97 81.45 1 1 2.336 2.368 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 6,000,000.00 5,976,560 00 6,000,000.00 18.55 974 841 2.745 2.783 Investments 32,351,524.97 32,328,084.97 32,351,524.97 100.00% 181 157 2.412 2.445 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending _ Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 64,964.49 673,083.75 Average Daily Balance 31,909,679.44 27,712,196.31 Effective Rate of Return 2.40% 2.64% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and availa lity of some of these fu ds is restricted by law(e.g. Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). SUS NAVA FINANCE DIR./TREASURER Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/10/2004-09:53 PM(PRF PM1)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAW&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 4,258,902.61 4,258,902.61 4,258,902.61 1.426 1.426 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 22,092,622.36 22,092,622.36 22,092,622.36 2.550 2.550 1 Subtotal and Average 25,909,679.44 26,351,524.97 26,351,524.97 26,351,524.97 2.368 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3128X16Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP, 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,998,120.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 534 11/17/2005 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,985,000.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 973 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 993,440.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 1,060 04/27/2007 Subtotal and Average 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 5,976,560.00 6,000,000.00 2.783 841 Total and Average 31,909,679.44 32,351,524.97 32,328,084.97 32,351,524.97 2.445 157 Portfolio CITY Run Date:06/10/2004-09:53 CP ( / PM(PRF PM2)SyrnRept V6.21 r \ 1 t Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME ) Portfolio Management Page 3 Activity By Type May 1, 2004 through May 31, 2004 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.550 527,502.10 0.00 Subtotal 25,824,022.87 527,502.10 0.00 26,351,524.97 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon Subtotal 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 Total 31,824,022.87 527,502.10 0.00 32,351,524.97 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/10/2004-09:53 PM(PRF PM3)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary May 2003 through May 2004 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity May 2003 5 29,305,724.20 2.827 2.866 2.801 0 0 107 79 June 2003 4 27,121,153.01 2.783 2.821 2.799 0 1 82 62 July 2003 4 27,157,885.07 2.671 2.709 2.677 0 0 82 60 August 2003 4 27,176,303.04 2.697 2.734 2.705 0 0 82 58 September 2003 3 25,384,046.40 2.799 2.838 2.831 0 1 44 31 October 2003 3 26,475,202.01 2.711 2.749 2.739 0 0 42 29 November 2003 3 26,087,655.91 2.614 2.651 2.680 1 1 57 56 December 2003 3 28,680,215.64 2.617 2.654 2.680 0 0 52 49 January 2004 4 27,400,432.25 2.663 2.700 2.696 1 0 174 168 February 2004 4 27,499,689.16 2.557 2.592 2.564 0 0 174 163 March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146 April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165 May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157 Average 4 28,157,176.51 2.634% 2.670% 2.644 0 0 109 94 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/10/2004-0 'z PM(PRF�' SymRept V6.21 eport Ver.5.00 I ( CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type May 2003 through May 2004 May June July August September October November December January February March April May Average Security Type 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 by Period LAIF&County Pool 89.8 92.6 92.6 92.6 96.1 96.2 92.3 93.0 81.8 81.8 83.1 81.2 81.5 88.8% Certificates of Deposit-Bank Certificates of Deposit-S&L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln Negotiable CD's -Bank CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing Commercial Paper-Discount _ Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 10.2 7.4 7.4 7.4 3.9 3.8 7.7 7.0 18.3 18.2 16.9 18.9 18.6 11.2% Federal Agency Issues-Discount Treasury Securities-Coupon Treasury Securities-Discount Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon ..... Miscellaneous Securities-Discount Non Interest Bearing Investments ......... _. Mortgage Backed Securities _.. . _.. Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2 Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/10/2004-09.53 PM(PRF_PM5)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary May 31, 2004 May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 23,000.00 54,000.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 34,966.67 34,966.67 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 44,050.00) ( 13,816.67) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 13,916.67 75,150.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 13,916.67 75,150.00 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 671,853.81 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 333,744.81 333,744.81 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 282,696.99) ( 407,664.87) Interest Earned during Period 51,047.82 597,933.75 Total Interest Earned during Period 64,964.49 673,083.75 Total Capital Gains or losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 64,964.49 673,083.75 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/10/2004-09:53 PM(PRF_PM6)SymRept V6.21 ( ( sport Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May31, 2004 Investments Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 759,976.05 759,976 05 759,976.05 100.00 1 1 1.406 1.426 Investments 759,976.05 759,976.05 759,976.05 100.00% 1 1 1.406 1.426 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending _ Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 936.93 50,628.04 Average Daily Balance 763,750.24 3,469,630.87 Effective Rate of Return 1.44% 1.59% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). W zoo J us Nava, 'nance Director/Treasurer Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:06/10/2004.09:56 PM(PRF PMI)SynnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Pages Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 759,976.05 759,976.05 759,976.05 1.426 1.406 1.426 1 Subtotal and Average 763,750.24 759,976.05 759,976.05 759,976.05 1.406 1.426 1 Total and Average 763,750.24 759,976.05 759,976.05 759,976.05 1.406 1.426 1 Portfolio 03BD Run Date:06/10/2004-09:56 CP r PM(PRF_PM2)rSymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2004 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 18,614,021.06 18,614,021 06 18,614,021.06 100.00 1 1 1.406 1.426 Investments 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 100.00% 1 1 1.406 1.426 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 23,034.88 62,507.40 Average Daily Balance 18,777,246.87 Effective Rate of Return 1.44% esus Nave, Finance Dir./Treasurer Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:06/10/2004.09:56 PM(PRF PM1)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details investments May 31, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 03/12/2004 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 1.426 1.426 1 Subtotal and Average 18,777,246.87 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 1.426 1 Total and Average 18,777,246.87 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 18,614,021.06 1.426 1 Portfolio 04BD Run Date:06/10/2004-09:56 CP PM(PRF PM2)SvmRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 co m ca st Comcast Cable 12647 Aicosta Blvd.,Suite 200 P.O.Box 5147 San Ramon,CA 94583 June 2, 2004 Jesus Nava Finance Director/Treasurer City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA. 94010 Dear Jesus Nava: It has always been our goal at Comcast Cable to ensure that your office is informed of the programming services offered to our customers who reside in your community in a timely manner. As a courtesy, we are sending you this notification to inform you of programming adjustments and naming changes to the Digital Music Choice services. Effective July 7, 2004 at 1:00 AM Music Choice will update their channel line-up based on the music industry trends, market research and customer feedback. Enclosed please find a spreadsheet detailing the scheduled adjustment. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact Kathi Noe at(650)289-6794. Sincerely, GJ - 4� __ V__'�--(? LUVQ Mitzi 'vens-Russell on behalf of Kathi Noe Director of Government Affairs and Franchising West Bay Peninsula Area Enclosure(1) Music Choice July 7,2004 Adjustments Channel Name Action Description Radio Disney is the family friendly home of cool music that kids are passionate about and parents love to hear. Featured artists incluse Hilary Duff,Avril Lavigne, Radio Disney Add Cheetah Girls,and Aaron Carter. Due to the huge popularity of Pop,Rock and R&B music, the biggest hits of the decade are here!Featured artists include Mariah Carey,Madonna,Pearl Jam,Jon Bon 90s Channel Add Jovi,Sheryl Crow,Nirvana and Boys II Men Relive the New Jack Swing and the best R&B jams of the late 80's,90;s and today.Featured Artists include: R&B Hits Add Janet,Guy,New Edition,TLC and Keith Sweat Music Choice will continue to program Mexicana and it will be available as an optional 46th channel on the Mexicana Removed Music Choice line-up Due to a declining listerner base,customer feedback, user research and current music trends,Music Choice Americana Removed has removed the Americana channel from the line-up Name and Format For Kids Only Change New Kids channel is Radio Disney Power Rock Name Chane New Name:Arena Rock Alternative Rock Name Chane New Name:Alternative New Wave Name Chane New Name:Retro-Active Progressive/Adult Alternative Name Chane New Name:Adult Musica Latina Name Chane New Name:Musica Latin Love Sons Name Chane New Name:Pop Latino