Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2010.03.11March 11, 2010 7:00 p.m. — Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —February 11, 2010 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State -Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "Request To Speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Commission Chairperson may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. CURRENT BUSINESS 7.1 Mercy High School: Alvarado/Adeline Traffic —Discussion 7.2 Burlingame Avenue 2 -Hour Parking Evaluation — Discussion 7.3 City ParkingPossible Meter &Rate Change —Discussion 8. INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF 8.1 Traffic Engineer's Report 8.1.1 101 Auxiliary Lane Project —Staff Update 8.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report 8.2.1 General/Selective Traffic Enforcement Report —Staff Update 8.3 Commissioners' Comments and Concerns 8.3.1 Miscellaneous Comments and Concerns Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission - Agenda March 11, 2010 Page 2 9. COMMUNICATIONS Report by Staff or Commissioners of citizen concerns or complaints regarding traffic, safety and parking issues that are within the Commission's jurisdiction. 10. COMMISSION &COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1 Burlingame Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory W111111 Committee meets 5:30PM in Conference Room B before each TSPC meeting. 10.2 Neighborhood Parking Working Group 10.3 Website/Communications Subcommittee 11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Dates for discussion to be determined later by Staff or Commissioners. 11.1 Ray Drive/EI Camino Real Intersection Evaluation (April) 11.2 Adeline/Cortez Intersection —Pedestrian Access (April) 11.3 City Parking Lot Q —Possible Re -configuration (Discussion Date Pending) 11.4 Radar Speed Trailer —Future Procurement (Discussion Date Pending) 12. ADJOURNMENT Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Engineering Counter at City Hall located at 501 Primrose Road during normal business hours. 11 • • CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org r Thursday,Meeting Minutes Unapproved -•2010 Commissioners Present: Mark Noworolski, Chair Jeff Londer, Vice Chair Nicklas Akers Laurie Simonson Caroline Serrato Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Sgt. Don Shepley, Police Department Joanne Louie, Administrative Secretary, Public Works Visitors: Colin Fisher, 443 Occidental Avenue Julie Baird, 908 Bayswater Avenue Ben Cohn, 2018 Trousdale Drive 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 5 of 5 Commissioners present. 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT —Welcome of new commissioners Chair Noworolski welcomed Nick Akers and Laurie Simonson to the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission. Commissioners Akers and Simonson each briefly spoke of their background and interest in this Commission. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Motion: To accept the minutes of January 14, 2010 as submitted l V A/S�: C I finerCeratnp \�krand imnncnn abgtained dti/n/9agC Do PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Fisher spoke regarding the parking restrictions on Occidental Avenue and his objection to the price for a residential parking permit. 7. CURRENT BUSINESS 7.1 Burlingame Avenue 24-Min/Short-term Parking evaluation —Discussion Mr. Chou presented a staff report with a recommendation that the existing 24 -minute spaces not be reduced or replaced with 1 -hour parking. He also recommended that the commission further evaluate and discuss the benefits and liabilities of re -allocating existing 24 -minute spaces along Burlingame Avenue for a more even distribution. Mr. Chouconcluded that this discussion should also be done in the context of future discussion regarding the Burlingame Avenue meter parking. Motion: Incorporate the Burlingame Avenue 24-minute/short term parking matter into the broader discussions on Burlingame Avenue meter parking. M/S/C: Louder/Serrato; 4/0/1 (Noworolski abstained) 8. Staff Reports 8.1 Traffic Engineer's Report 8.1.1 101 Auxiliary Lane Project —Staff Update Mr. Chou provided a brief update on the work currently being done at the Broadway Pedestrian Overcrossing as part of the Caltrans US 101 Auxiliary Lane Project. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that heavy traffic congestion should be exVected at the intersection of Rollins Road and Broadway on February 17, 2010, when Caltrans has scheduled a complete signal shutdown. He said an SMC alert would be issued and an eNews item would be sent out to alert the community. Gilbreth Road On -street Parking Changes —Staff Update Mr. Chou provided a brief update regarding the change in parking restrictions along Gilbreth Road. He said that staff would be presenting this item as an ordinance to the City Council on an upcoming agenda for their adoption. 8.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report 8.2.1 Ray Drive/EI Camino Real Intersection Evaluation —Staff Update As previously requested, Sergeant Shepley provided accident data for the intersection of may Drive and EI Camino Real from 2005 to current. Ghair Noworolski inquired as to now these numbers compared to other intersections along EI Camino Real. Sergeant Shepley said that he would attempt to get this information for the Commission. A request was made to make this a future agenda item. Sergeant Shepley reported that a grant application was submitted to fund a radar trailer and speed enforcement overtime. Sergeant Shepley reported that Lot H is in operation as a pay lot as of February 1, 2010 and has since not been as full. 8.3 Commissioners' Comments and Concerns 8.3.1 Miscellaneous Comments and Concerns Commissioner Louder mentioned the Safe Streets Program of San Mateo County, which would be allocating $1.4 million for three years. He said that the program would pertain to safe biking and pedestrians. Mr. Chou stated that there were three sources of funding being considered from the State but most are Federal. The third program is Safe Routes to School. He said that funds were being allocated on a short timeline for "shovel ready" projects. Commissioner Louder again raised the concern of drivers using cell phones while driving. Commissioner Serrato suggested that we use electronic signage that alerts dI ivers that "Burlingame enforces the no cell phone while driving law". 9. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Chou reported that he was informed by the Planning staff that Mercy High School had plans to expand their student body and was applying for a permit. He said that the Planning Commission was asking the TSPC look at the parking situation on the surrounding city streets. Mr. Chou stated that this item would be a future agenda item; and, that he would provide a staff report so that the Commission would be able to make their recommendations to the Planning Commission. 10. COMMISSION &COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1 Burlingame Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory committee (B/PAC) Mr. Chou reported that the subcommitt ee met earlier this evening and discussed the possibility of future funding sources that might be available for bike and pedestrian related projects. Commissioner Louder nominated Commissioner Simonson to serve on the B/PAC committee because of the vacancy left by former Commissioner Bohnert; and, was seconded by Commissioner Serrato. Commissioner Simonson will serve along with Chair Noworolski. The Commission also noted that they would like to revisit having the IT Website Subcommittee on future agendas. Chair Noworolski nominated Commissioner Londer to serve; and, was seconded by Commissioner Simonson. 10.2 Neighborhood Parking Working Group Commissioner Akers volunteered to serve on this committee alongside with Chair Noworolski. 11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 11.1 Burlingame Avenue — On -street Parking (March) 11.2 Adeline/Cortez Intersection —Pedestrian Access (April) 11.3 City Parking Lot K — Possbile Meter &Rate Change (March) 11.4 City Parking Lot Q —Possible Re -configurations (no discussion/pending) 11.5 Radar Speed Trailer —Future Procurement (no discussion/pending) 12.ADJOURNMENT 8:36 p.m. TO: Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission DATE: March 4, 2010 FROM: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Item 7.1 — Mercy High School: Alvarado Traffic Meeting Date: March 11, 2010 RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission conduct the following: Evaluate the traffic conditions, especially along Alvarado Avenue, and review actions already taken by Mercy High School to address residential concerns. ® Receive public and neighborhood comments on the traffic conditions on Alvarado and Adeline. ® Determine other possible mitigating actions not already taken to address residential concerns. ® Return a recommendation to the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: On January 11, 2010, the Mercy High School administration went before the Burlingame Planning Commission with an application to amend the school's Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of one single -story addition to the existing physical education building; and, more specific to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, to increase the school's maximum enrollment from 500 to 540 students and the addition of three additional staff. A primary concern of both the Planning Commission and the surrounding neighbors was the current traffic conditions on Alvarado Avenue, and to some extent Adeline Drive, and how an increase in enrollment might exacerbate the existing conditions. To help alleviate those concerns, the school held a neighborhood meeting on campus. Ultimately, at the 1/11 meeting, the Planning Commission passed a motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow building construction work. A second motion was also passed to deny the request to amend the Conditional Use Permit to increase the limit on student enrollment. In addition, the Planning Commission also provided direction to the Mercy High School administration that if/when another request for enrollment increase is presented before the city, that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission be involved in any public notice (particularly along the 1400 block of Alvarado Avenue). DISCUSSION: The Mercy High School administration is planning to return to the Planning Commission within the next few months for reconsideration of their request to increase student enrollment. In an effort to fulfill the Planning Commission's requirement for review, Mercy High School has come before the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission to gather additional comments and possible suggestions in addressing residential concerns of school traffic, especially along Alvarado Avenue. Mercy High School has also already made efforts on their own to alleviate some of the current traffic impacts by: 1. Requiring all students and faculty parking to be on-site only. 2. Implementing carpools and alternate forms of transportation. 3. Look into decreasing the number of student parking permits issued. Page 1 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.1 Mercy Traffic.doc In terms of site description, the Mercy High School site is located along the northwestern edge of Adeline Drive. The main entrance is located at the intersection of Alvarado Avenue and Adeline Drive. Students and faculty are required to use this as the primary entrance and exit to the school grounds. Since this intersection serves as essentially the only point of ingress and egress, there has naturally been problems that result from the heavy traffic congestion during the start and end of school. The main objective of this meeting should be to gather up neighborhood concerns of traffic on city streets and to determine if the current traffic control measures taken by the school are effective; and, if other measures not yet implemented can be considered. Finally, the Planning Commission is requesting that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission return a recommendation and/or finding as a result of this meeting on whether to proceed with their review process. Page 2 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.1 Mercy Traffic.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tel:(650) 558-7230 Fax:(650) 685-9310 logo •-101 1 1 p.m., Thursday,7Y:1arcb1 1 CouncilCity Hall, • -rs, 501 Primrose• •. CORPORATION YARD Tel:(650) 558-7670 The Burlingame Traffic Safety and Parking Commission will be holding a public meeting to discuss the traffic situation and impacts on Alvarado Avenue by Mercy High School traffic. (Minor discussions may also take place regarding Adeline Drive.) The Commission will be addressing whether or not current traffic measures implemented by Mercy High School have been effective, and to explore the possibility of alternate measures. The Traff ic Safety and Parking Commission welcomes public comments during the meeting, which will be on Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Council Chambers. Public participation and attendance is encouraged. If you are unable to att end this meeting and wish to provide written comment, please mail comments to Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA WEwain All ;niriff n comments Will he fnnniarrlerl t"NOWo the Commission if rPf_P_IVP.r1 before 5PM, March 11, 2010. S:\A Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Public Notices\Public Nolice - 3-11-10 Mercy Traffic.doc AGENDA Meeting with City of Burlingame Mercy High School Traffic and Parking I. Actions to Reduce Traffic ® Incentives for student carpooling Enrollment for this academic year totaled 497 students. Of those 60 students ride the Burlingame City Shuttle, 16 ride the Mercy High School Shuttle from the train/Bart and 216 carpool. Thus, approximately 58% of students are not single drivers/trips. Mercy High School ("MHS") encourages students' parents to coordinate carpools at the commencement of each academic year by providing neighborhood address lists. For student drivers, it is difficult to carpool as DMV rules prohibit drivers under the age of 18 from transporting passengers under the age of 20 (i.e. other students). Although MHS would be willing to assign premium parking spaces to students who carpool, given the DMV rule, it is unlikely that students drivers can carpool with other students. MHS hasa service program and would be willing to assign "green points" to students who participate in a carpool. These points go toward end of year awards for service. We anticipate these measures will result in 1 or 2% more students carpooling. ® Incentives for faculty/staff to use non -auto travel to/from work At the time the Fehr &Peers study was conducted in 2008, 4 or 5 faculty/staff used non - auto travel methods. The school schedule makes it somewhat difficult for faculty/staff to use non -auto travel. However, to encourage its use, MHS proposes to participate in the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance's Commuter Benefit, which allows employees to use pre-tax dollars for commute expenses. Flyer attached. ® Incentives for faculty/staff car pooling It is somewhat difficult for faculty/staff to carpool due to varying schedules and home locations. MHS is willing to assign premium parking spaces to those faculty who carpool. MHS anticipates that this may result in one or two additional faculty/staff carpools. 11. Actions to Reduce Parking ® Decrease the amount of student driver permits At the time the Fehr &Peers study was conducted in 2008, 99 student parking permits were issued. This academic year, MHS issued only 92 permits. ® Assign parking spaces Generally, MHS believes that the flow of traffic into the parking lot is more efficient if spaces are not specifically assigned to students. However, MHS would be willing to consider assigning spaces to individual permit holders and/or assigning priority spaces as discussed above. Spaces are also assigned to faculty/staff. I11. Actions to Reduce Neighborhood Tensions ® Courtesy nnHS l� ��!illing to fiend ni it ni ia!-tPrjy ne\0./giettarc to the �ti irlent/parant rnrnmi inity to remind them to drive safely and carefully and to the neighborhood to remind them that they can and should contact Laura Held with any concerns or complaints about the traffic situation. As now, if a neighbor is able to provide vehicle license, color, make and model information, Laura will follow-up to determine if she can discover which student or parent may be responsible and take appropriate action. N:\DATA\Clients\M\Mercy High School\DocslBurlingame Agenda 2.7.10.doc Company Name: T Address Main Phone Number: Contact Person: Phone number: # of Employees: Does your company If "YES';' � Is your Briefly If `NO ;please DWill MU�fEF Ttle: Email: _. Top Priority: Wex� _ Priority: We wouh _ Low Priority: Our commuter To apply for the Commuter Benefit AlliarieeE by fax; (650) 588-8171, or tiy''R no later than June 30, 2010. (For additional *Terms and Conditions. • For your company to' qualify for the Pre -Tax Commuter Benefit Em• ployer Incentive Program, a completed Registration Form must be received by the Alliance no later than June 30, 2010. • Only. San Mateo County employers are eligible to apply. • The employers new pre-tax commuter benefit plan must have a start date of July 1 2009 or later. • Incentives are awarded only one-time per company. • Verification by Alliance staff is required prior to disbursement. • Alliance Rewardsp will be offered to qualified employers until the desig- nated funds have been awarded, but no later than June 30, 2010. For Employers • Register yourcompany with your assigned Alliance Representative. • Only newRre-tax Go1 1119.1UI enefit programs chat took effect on or after July 1, 2009 are qualified to receive the employer incentives. • Companies may choose to administer this program internally, -or utilize the services of avendor. • Incentive amounts are determined by the total employees in your com- panyand the percentage of employees actively participating in the Pre - Tax Commuter Benefit Program during the first three months of the effective date (see chart of dght). • Companies will be asked to submit a W-9 form and to document its employee participation level. (Pls. specify: date: consultative meeting. to be kept informed. ?N the completed Registration form San Bruno, CA 94066 please read °Terms and Conditions° below.) For Program Coordinators • Register your company today, and you will have access to "start-up" assistance to launch your company's new benefits program. • Alliance staff will provide consultation services, at no charge, and sup- portive resources, in addition to the Alliance Rewards incentives for your company. • Be part of a special drawing for Program Coordinators. Contact your Alliance Programs Representative for more details, Pre -Tax Commuter BenefibEmployerincentives , ABiance REWARDS Employee Peninsula traff Categories; _t Participation Leve[ e Company Name: T Address Main Phone Number: Contact Person: Phone number: # of Employees: Does your company If "YES';' � Is your Briefly If `NO ;please DWill MU�fEF Ttle: Email: _. Top Priority: Wex� _ Priority: We wouh _ Low Priority: Our commuter To apply for the Commuter Benefit AlliarieeE by fax; (650) 588-8171, or tiy''R no later than June 30, 2010. (For additional *Terms and Conditions. • For your company to' qualify for the Pre -Tax Commuter Benefit Em• ployer Incentive Program, a completed Registration Form must be received by the Alliance no later than June 30, 2010. • Only. San Mateo County employers are eligible to apply. • The employers new pre-tax commuter benefit plan must have a start date of July 1 2009 or later. • Incentives are awarded only one-time per company. • Verification by Alliance staff is required prior to disbursement. • Alliance Rewardsp will be offered to qualified employers until the desig- nated funds have been awarded, but no later than June 30, 2010. For Employers • Register yourcompany with your assigned Alliance Representative. • Only newRre-tax Go1 1119.1UI enefit programs chat took effect on or after July 1, 2009 are qualified to receive the employer incentives. • Companies may choose to administer this program internally, -or utilize the services of avendor. • Incentive amounts are determined by the total employees in your com- panyand the percentage of employees actively participating in the Pre - Tax Commuter Benefit Program during the first three months of the effective date (see chart of dght). • Companies will be asked to submit a W-9 form and to document its employee participation level. (Pls. specify: date: consultative meeting. to be kept informed. ?N the completed Registration form San Bruno, CA 94066 please read °Terms and Conditions° below.) For Program Coordinators • Register your company today, and you will have access to "start-up" assistance to launch your company's new benefits program. • Alliance staff will provide consultation services, at no charge, and sup- portive resources, in addition to the Alliance Rewards incentives for your company. • Be part of a special drawing for Program Coordinators. Contact your Alliance Programs Representative for more details, Pre -Tax Commuter BenefibEmployerincentives , ABiance REWARDS Employee Peninsula traff Categories; _t Participation Leve[ nail •er 25 or less employees odium Employer 26 to 75 employeasr-00 ic Congestion Relief Alliance ph: 650.588.8170 • emaa: alliance@commute.org 6. 2300 and 2750 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED Rm1 e APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A SINGLE -STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING PHYSICAL EDUCATION BUILDING AND TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT AT THE EXISTING MERCY HIGH SCHOOL (DARREL JUSTUS, APPLICANT; MERCY HIGH SCHOOL, PROPERTY OWNER; AND DES ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated January 11, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirty-five (35) conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission comments: ■ Is there any requirement for replacement trees on the property? ■ With regards to Conditional Use Permits for schools, are there any specific caps for enrollment on any of the other schools in Burlingame? (Meeker— don't know if that would be a good guide for this particular request.) ■ Do we know if the school has exceeded the 500 student enrollment at this point? Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Laura Held, Principal -Mercy High School, 2750 Adeline Drive; Jean Hastie, Campus Administrator- Sisters of Mercy, 2300 Adeline Drive; Leigh Prince, attorney for Mercy High School, 1100 Alma Street, Menlo Park, and Mark Hudak, attorney for Sisters of Mercy, 215 Park Road; represented the applicant and Sisters of Mercy: ■ Have studied this proposal extensively to ensure that an amendment only needs to be requested once. ■ The small parking and traffic increase is due to parents and faculty. ■ Have reached out to the neighborhood and have heard concerns regarding traffic impacts, will continue to encourage safe driving and parking. ■ Have already made progress implementing several of the measures suggested by the traffic analysis; carpooling and alternate forms of transportation are used. ■ May look at decreasing the number of student parking permits for the next year. ■ Have heard concerns regarding additional traffic and noise attributable to the additional bleacher seats, do not anticipate additional persons at these events. ■ Sisters of Mercy support the requests for the changes by Mercy High School; do not believe that the changes will affect the Sisters of Mercy or the Mercy Retreat Center. ■ Sisters of Mercy also accept the City's request to treat the site as one site. ■ The City has requested a formal covenant tying the properties together; this is being studied closely by the Sisters' attorney. The covenant will be required before a building permit is issued. ■ Sisters of Mercy asks the Commission to approve the requests, subject to agreement on the form of the covenant. Commission comments: ■ Requested clarification of enrollment numbers. (Held -Current enrollment is 497 students. Last year were over -enrolled at 510 students.) Public comments: 21 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 77, 2070 Judith Carle, 2300 Adeline Drive; Alexandra Kromelow, 2621 Adeline Drive; Linda ADDY, 2415 Adeline Drive; Chelsea Morton -Jones, 675 Kellmore Street, Moss Beach; Georgene Carambat, 440 Hazel Avenue, Millbrae; Michael Gaul, 2838 Adeline Drive; Meaghan Osborne, 75 Crestview Avenue, Daly City; Joe Galligan, 2404 Easton Drive; Randy Vandenbrink, 1412 Alvarado Avenue, Paul Denning, 1425 Alvarado Avenue; Bill Coenday, 1476 Alvarado Avenue; Katie O'Brien, 2244 Poppy Drive; Jok Legallet, 1474 Alvarado Avenue; Robert Morton -Jones, 675 Kellmore Street, Moss Beach; ■ The application materials have been reviewed by the Sisters of Mercy and they encourage approval. ■ Against the proposed amendment, the original Conditional Use Permit set forth the basis for all other elements of the Conditional Use Permit; all items should be revisited as part of the permit. ■ From 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and in the evening, vehicles are stacked 15 -cars deep on surrounding streets. They don't obey traffic laws. Students park on the streets at all times. ■ A 5% increase of student enrollment and a 9.5% increase in staffing was approved with the original permit, as opposed to prior year's numbers. ■ Why does the school now feel an additional 40 students are required? ■ The school could reduce enrollment to comply with restrictions. ■ Have admission files been reviewed by the City? ■ With respect to the trees and landscaping, many trees have been removed, stumps remain. Would like a new Oak planted for every tree removed. ■ Shouldn't be allowed to increase the number of people that can use the bleachers. ■ Against allowing additional traffic and parking; but not opposed to an increase in enrollment. ■ There are multiple unreported vehicle accidents in the area due to parents and students at the school. ■ Opposed to outdoor seating increase, will bring too much traffic to the service road; should be reserved for more open space. ■ Make all past and current accident reports a part of the hearing. ■ Provide all background regarding the Conditional Use Permit. ■ Requested an Environmental Impact Report be prepared. ■ Request actual number of spectators at facility in the prior months. ■ The use of Kohl Mansion is not appropriate within an RA area. ■ Requested a one-way traffic pattern in the area. ■ Imperative to remember that other students of other schools are walking through the area. ■ Has attended Mercy High School and will graduate this year; supportive of the school. ■ Board member at the high school; have looked closely at the number of students that can be accommodated, increasing enrollment could help to keep tuition costs down. ® Adding 10 students to each class will not create a significant impact. ■ Traffic at Mercy High School is easier to navigate than traffic at Burlingame High School. ■ The proposed addition will not be a visual impact from anywhere outside the property. ■ Difficult to pin down enrollment, never certain how many will actually enroll at the facility. ■ Very few times that all students are present on the campus. ■ There is no more space available beyond 540 students. ■ The budget being proposed is only for 500 students, but want a buffer. ■ Are concerned about ensuring traffic safety. ■ Mercy High School existed prior to the homes on Adeline Drive and on Alvarado Avenue. ■ People on Alvarado Avenue want to use the street for parking, but problems could be lessened with no parking on the street. ■ Have not exceeded noise restrictions at events. ■ Disagrees 11__1noticing __1• �_ _ 1 li' 1 11. A ^^ 1_1__I_ _2 Al. ._.,__I X. � _. Disa�g ees trial noticing was only restiicteU LU r UU UwGK Ur HrvaiauU wf Ufie-year review. ■ Traffic is out of control in the area. ■ Mercy has been called multiple times over the years; they have not been responsive; has had to stop traffic so his wife can get out of the driveway. 22 ® There have been multiple suggestions for other traffic patterns; Mercy has refused to consider any of the suggestions. ® The change will impact the neighborhood. ® There needs to be mitigation of the impacts; the entire use needs to be evaluated again and other reductions should be imposed to mitigate impacts. ® Mercy traffic has become more problematic over the years; has become more difficult to get out of a driveway. ® Automobile traffic is the main form of transportation for students. ® Doesn't appear to be much of an effort being taken to promote use of public transportation. ® Witnesses parents speeding a lot. ■ Was not notified of the amendment request; the 1400 block of Alvarado Avenue is one of the most impacted areas. ® Consider looking into a speed strip to monitor how fast vehicles are traveling through the area. ■ Traffic is the main problem. ■ Has chased a person that hit his car in order to get the driver to stop; traffic speeds through the area; should be allowed to park in front of your house if you're a resident. ® Traffic is horrendous. ® With any school, there is a traffic problem. ® Doesn't observe a major traffic jam on Adeline Drive during school hours. ® People need to move their cars out of the street. ® Mercy is good to its neighbors. ® Public schools have greater enrollments as well. ® More traffic will be generated by the requested amendments. ® Students aren't supposed to be dropped off outside the campus, but it is happening. ® People are now parking on Benito Avenue and Adeline Drive. ® Send the matter back to the neighborhood for further input. Additional comments from Applicant (Leigh Prince): ® No problem regarding requesting an amendment. ® Have self -policed themselves, this is why an amendment is requested. ® Referenced CEQA exemption categories; falls below thresholds. ■ There is no change in use. ® Reiterated that the tree in question is only in fair condition according to the arborist. ® With respect to parking; students are required to park in designated spaces. Conditions in the Conditional Use Permit limit events. ® Parking is allowed on the service road. ® Make efforts to inform parents and students to drive safely and stop if there is a problem. ® The principal is responsive to neighbors when contacted. ® Mercy High School sent out a notice to neighbors in advance of the hearing. Additional Commission comments: ® How do we ensure that the increased enrollment is not exceeded? (Held — 540 is an absolute maximum capacity; would like to reach 520 ideally. Cannot handle a greater number facility -wise.) ® Were students turned away to get back down to the enrollment number? (Held — several factors resulted in a drop in enrollment.) ® 'With respect to traffic; can specific drop-offroutes be given to parents. (Heid — ask parents to drive carefully. Have security patrols at gate and interior of campus.) ® How many students live in Burlingame? (Held — probably have larger number of students from outside Burlingame.) 23 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 11, 2010 ■ What types of activities occur at the pool? Is it sufficient to support water polo? Are more activities anticipated? (Held — only water polo practice and meets and regular swimming practice. No increase in activities anticipated.) ■ What are the school hours? (Held — 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. with after school activities ending at 6 p.m.) ■ Could school hours be amended to start at a later time? (Held — have not given consideration to such a change; but would need to factor into overall scheduling.) ■ Has Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission reviewed the traffic and circulation in the area? (Meeker— unknown.) ■ Discussed circulation patterns on the site. (Held — some roads through the site are not suitable for traffic and are restricted in use by the Sisters of Mercy. Abby — some of these roads were used for many years for circulation. Hudak — must understand that two separate parcels exist. Hastie — doesn't know what the fire road was used for in the past, but has been deemed only available to emergency traffic. Rebuilding the road is cost prohibitive. The lower Columbus/Hoover Gate Road travels through areas of the Sisters of Mercy property; is used by the Sisters who have decided not to open them to traffic.) ■ How many traffic incidents are heard of per year? (Held — this year, three occurrences. Have phoned and/or e-mailed with neighbors to gather information on the event for follow-up; if information is received, she follows -up.) ■ How many students attend classes off-site? (Held — approximately 25 students.) ■ There must be some solution to help move traffic along, is there a traffic pattern that can be devised to alleviate problems? ■ Has there been any type of outreach/community meetings to attempt to resolve this issue. (Held — want to be good neighbors; are open to working together with the community to attempt to find a solution. There was a prior discussion regarding creating traffic patterns to improve conditions. Have contacted Burlingame Police Department to manage traffic problems. Willing to have neighborhood meetings.) ■ How much parking is available to the High School? (Held - 99 spaces for students and 72 for faculty and staff. Doesn't believe that additional parking can be created.) ■ Drop-off and pick-up are also issues. ■ Doesn't have much of an issue with the gym and bleachers changes. Additional public comments: Alexandra Kromelow, 2621 Adeline Drive; and Dennis Huajardo, 1400 Columbus Avenue; ® An increase in student enrollment should not be considered until traffic problems are resolved. ■ Consider a staging area for students in order to reduce traffic impacts. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Further Commission comments: ■ Ok with the gym and bleacher changes, wait on the enrollment question until mitigations can be evaluated. ■ Believe traffic problem only exists on Alvarado Avenue; suggest some kind of traffic mitigation research to relieve traffic on Alvarado Avenue. ■ Demonstrate what can be done to help traffic circulation; should consider various alternatives. P1,_J L� L J LI______/_.__ 1__. ._ J LIie L L INUUU w UALUM uIC1r15U1vU5 Ut!YUIIU uUUMU5 with LraLc monitoring. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 77, 2010 CommissionerAuran moved to approve the request for a Hillside Area Construction Permit, and amend the Conditional Use Permit, without an increase in the maximum student enrollment, subject to the following conditions: 1. that Mercy High School shall only be open during the hours of 6:00 a.m. to Fe Monday through Friday, from August to mid-June, with a maximum enrollment of 500 students and 80 faculty/staff members, 2. that after school programs shall occur only during the hours of 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 3. that students shall be informed that cars shall only be parked on-site in designated parking areas; no student parking shall be allowed to occur in the surrounding residential streets, Mercy High School staff or representatives shall supervise and monitor campus traffic and parking at the beginning and the end of each school day during the school year; 4. that all busses used by students or visiting teams shall be parked on site; parking directions to site parking areas shall be provided to visiting teams and schools; 5. that enrollment for summer school and sports camp programs shall be limited to a total of 275 participants, summer school and camps may occur only during the hours of 8:15 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. Monday through Friday; 6. that Montessori Preschool shall be open only during the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, with a maximum enrollment of 30 students; 7. that all vehicles delivering students to the Mercy High School and Montessori school sites or picking students up from the schools on the site shall enter the school campus area though the gates to the site and drop students off or pick them up on-site at locations designated by each school; 8. that in addition to service deliveries, any parking along the service road (shown as "EASEMENT" on Plot Plan attached as Attachment 1 to 2-21-07 City staff report) and the service road parking area shall be limited to parking for faculty and staff of Mercy High School and the Montessori school only, no student parking shall be allowed along the service road or in the service road parking area, 9. that any intensification of use including maximum number of students enrolled in the school, number of support educators and staff or summer school and sports program enrollment number, which exceeds the maximums stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit, 10. that each contract for rental or use of Kohl Mansion shall include a copy of the noise limits and other requirements for operation established in these conditions of approval along with the requirement that the contractor shall comply with each of these requirements or cease its event on the Kohl Mansion site; 11. that the base line for defining noise problems used on the Mercy High School site shall be the CSlab11S1 led lnilty Slal ldal d vVl lll:.l I II II,I IAUCS: ally 11o1Se wl lllil 11$ I lve (5) det;IbelS ovel 11 le al I Iblelllt I IOISe level at the time of the event at property line; and the requirements of Chapter 10.40 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 11, 2010 120 that in order to monitor and document noise at the Kohl Mansion: a. Mercy High School shall purchase one or more decibel mete, ks), as appropriate, designed for the purpose of measuring sound out-of-doors; the security and other appropriate staff shall be trained in the proper use and maintenance of the noise meters; b. The School shall work with a qualified noise specialist to establish a baseline ambient noise level at various noise sensitive locations and at various times during a 24 hour. period along the property line of the Mercy High School site; c. During each event scheduled at Kohl Mansion for the next year, the noise levels at these established locations shall be measured and recorded in a log. The log shall document which events used sound amplification and whether the amplification was inside or outside, including those events with music. This data shall be tabulated monthly into a log and shall be submitted to the City as a part of the annual review of the baseline conditions of approval, and d. Noise measurements shall not be required during the occasional weekday Mercy High School student body events; 13. that Kohl Mansion events shall be limited as follows: a. No more than 125 events shall be conducted at Kohl Mansion during any calendar year that are in addition to Mercy High School events and "Music at Kohl Mansion" events; b. During any calendar year, no more than six (6) non -school events shall be held during the day while school is in session, and most guests at such an event shall arrive by bus; and c. The only sound amplification that shall occur outdoors shall be limited to the amplification of normal speaking voices during speeches, ceremonies, services, and Mercy High School rallies and presentations, 14. that events held at the Kohl Mansion shall end: a. No later than 10:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, with holidays and evenings before holidays excepted; and b. No later than 11:00 D.M. on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, holidays and evenings before holidays; 15. that between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., the "take-down" for outdoor parties shall be limited to activities that do not cause a noise disturbance across property lines into a properly located in a residential district, in accordance with Burlingame Municipal Code Section 10.40.039; however, in no event shall tents be taken down between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; MERCY CENTER i 6. tiat over light proy`rai,S at the Mer%y C ei,ter 5,iaii be iii,ited to a ,iaxii,iai, Of 9i guests; ,ieetingS and sessions as a part of these programs shall conclude by 9:00 p.m.; these programs may include an internship program in July with a maximum of 60 participants, and retreats which last an average of three (3) days and a maximum of ten (10) days with an average of 33 retreat participants, W CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes January 11, 2010 17. that day programs and activities at the Mercy Center and Chapel shall be limited to the activities such as a Sunday speaker series; Saturday spiritual direction programs; daily meditation, chapel and prayer groups; evening services, including, but not limited to, the Friday evening Taize service, Sunday mass; non-profit organizational meetings; Mercy Center bookstore. Day Program events shall be scheduled only during the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., and shall be limited to no more than 150 participants, SISTERS OF MERCY 18. that the Labyrinth Garden shall be only open to the public daily from sunrise to sunset; 19. that the Motherhouse Room and Board facility for Sisters of Mercy shall be limited to a maximum of 50 residents, 20. that the Marian Care Convent and Infirmary for Sisters of Mercy shall be limited to a maximum of 40 residents; 21. that the Lodge Cottage House shall be limited to housing a maximum of 4 residents; 22, that Russell Hall may include classrooms for Mercy High School and administrative offices for the Sisters of Mercy and Mercy High School. It shall be open for conduct of classes and business only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily and shall be limited to a maximum of 35 employees, ENTIRE SITE 23. that the maximum, cumulative number of guests for all events occurring at any one time at the Kohl Mansion, Mercy High School, Mercy Center, and the remainder of the facilities and property subject to this conditional use permit shall be 300. The maximum, cumulative number of event support staff for all events occurring at any one time at the Kohl Mansion, Mercy High School, Mercy Center, and the remainder of the facilities and property subject to this conditional use permit shall be fifty (50). Any changes in the nature of the events, maximum number of guests and support staff, or any other provision specified in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 24. that as a part of the agreement for use of any facility on the site, information shall be provided regarding available parking for the event; participants shall be informed that all parking shall occur on site; there shall be no overflow parking allowed on the surrounding public streets; 25. that Sisters of Mercy and Mercy High School shall provide the neighbors and public with a 24/7 phone number for emergencies and complaints. This telephone 'hot line' shall be answered by an individual trained to respond to neighborhood complaints at the time the complaint is received, and, in the case of after-hours events at Kohl Mansion, a process shall be instituted that would convey information about a complaint immediately to the staff member supervising the event who has the authority to address the issue immediately with the customers and site security; 26a that the Sisters of Mercy and Mercy High School shall be responsible for producing and providing online to the public a comprehensive calendar of events planned for the facilities on the properties owned by the Sisters of iJiercy and iJercy High School, and a copy of the calendar shall also be provided to the Burlingame Police Department. The calendar of events shall include, at a minimum, the nature of the event, the duration of the event, the date of the event and the contact number for someone wishing to inquire about the calendar and events; that this calendar shall be compiled, 27 updated, maintained and posted regularly throughout the year, 27. that the addition U existing physical education building and replacement and addition of new bleachers shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 17, 2009, sheets G0.01 through G0.03, G1.01, A1.01, A2.01, A2.02 and A5.01; 28. that prior to issuance of a building permit, a covenant or deed restriction, in a form approved by the City Attorney, shall be recorded which addresses the extension of the proposed building addition and bleachers across property lines; 29. that prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit from the Parks Division for removal of the existing 17.9/13.5 inch diameter coast live oak tree; 30. that any changes to the size or envelope of the addition or bleachers, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, shall require an amendment to this permit; 31. that the conditions of the Traffic Engineer's September 24, 2009 memo, the City Arborist's July 27, 2009 memo, the Chief Building Official's June 10, 2009 memo, the City Engineer's June 18, 2009 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 9, 2009 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's June 11, 2009 memo shall be met; 32. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 33. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit, and 34. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0. Commissioner Cauchi moved to deny the request for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to increase the limits on student enrollment and in faculty/staff; without prejudice. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom Discussion of Motion: ® Direction was given to ensure that if/when the request for an increase in maximum enrollment and faculty/staff, that public noticing include all properties located within the 1400 block of Alvarado Avenue; this requirement shall be applied to all future requests involving the use. TO: Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission DATE: March 4, 2010 FROM: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Item 7.2 — Burlingame Avenue 2 -Hour Parking RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission conduct the following: Meeting Date: March 11, 2010 ® Hold several TSPC meetings to receive public/business comments and review staff analysis regarding the meter parking time limits along Burlingame Avenue. ® Provide City Council with a recommendation on its findings resulting from these public meetings with the business community. BACKGROUND: Between 1999 and 2005, the City hired Wilbur Smith Associates to conduct long-term studies regarding the parking situation within the Burlingame Avenue Business District. Originally, the City was approached by members of the business community with concerns that there wasn't enough parking turn -over along the Avenue. There were complaints that because of the low price in meter parking, less stringent parking enforcement, and no incentives to park elsewhere, people were abusing the parking spaces on the Avenue; thus, not allowing potential new customers from using those same spaces. Based on the studies by Wilbur Smith Associates, the City determined that several changes to the parking situation in the business district were necessary. The first was a phased approach to increasing the meter rate directly on the Avenue, from $0.25 per hour to $0.75 per hour. Second, was the creation of low-cost, long-term parking in city lots, one to two blocks off the Avenue area. Third, was the designation of less expensive 2 -hour and 4 -hour on -street parking on surrounding streets such as Primrose Road, Lorton Avenue, Park Road, Howard Avenue, Donnelly Avenue, Highland Avenue, and Chapin Avenue. The purpose for these changes were, 1) to make the price of parking on the Avenue more valuable to the user, 2) give long-term parkers such as business employees a cheaper and specific place to park; and, 3) give business customers who need more than 1 -hour on -street parking spaces on surrounding streets. DISCUSSION: The City recognizes that the business makeup on the Avenue is varied and continually changing. There are retail and restaurant businesses that require more than 1 -hour parking, while there are also businesses that want more short-term parking, such as Walgreen's and BevMo. One of the goals of the current parking plan was an attempt at balancing between the two parking needs in the business district — the need for more than 1 -hour, and the need for 1 -hour or less parking. The City has recently heard from some business owners that the 1 -hour parking limit on Burlingame Avenue is not enough time for their customers. Conversely, the City has also heard from other business owners that there isn't enough parking available on the Avenue. Unfortunately, the Burlingame Avenue Page 1 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.2 2 -Hr Ave Parking.doc Business District does not have an association or spokesperson who can relay the general consensus of the business community to the City. The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission is a way for the City to hear and consolidate the parking interests of all the businesses in the area. It should be cautioned that one of the original concerns about parking on the Avenue was the abuse of long-term parkers at the meters. Because of the abuse of some people parking longer than the 1 -hour limit, there was little turn -over and frustration with new customers not finding available spaces on the Avenue. Consideration to increase the parking time limit to 2 -hours (or some time increment of that limit), could potentially put the parking situation on the Avenue back into a position it was in 1999. Conversely, an increase could be more representative %J the current needs of Burlingame Avenue, and the surrounding area. In either case, the City needs to make sure that the collective wishes of the entire business district are accounted for before any determination can be made. Page 2 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.2 2 -Hr Ave Parking.doc T CL m E Z N Y E p p N E W cm W1 cc O ~ S > > O a d p Z C S S = `7 O O fN t} LL L J Ep 5� VN rt� GwwG�NVP�F� J Ln J � •` � ���• Lao ;o HIGHLAND AVE 0> J O J J rn c N C -�D a a n E fi a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tel:(650) 558-7230 Fax: (650) 685-9310 11 p.m., Thursday,1 1 City Hall, Council Chambers, 1 • •. • The City of Burlingame is evaluating the following two items: CORPORATION YARD Te1:(650) 558-7670 ® Consideration to maintain the existing 1 -hour parking limit or change to a 2 -hour parking limit along Burlingame Avenue, within the business district. ® Consideration to change several 10 -hour spaces in "Public Parking Lot K to 2 -hour parking spaces. As part of the evaluation process, the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission is requesting business and public comments during their meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. i Mn Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Council Chambers. Public participation and att endance is encouraged; however, if you are unable to attend this meeting and ���ish to provide comment, �,��ritten comments may be submitted by postal mail to Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. All written comments will be forwarded to the Commission if received before 5PM, March 11, 2010. S:1A Public Works Directory\TSP CommissionlResponse &Notification Letters to RequestslPublic Notice - 3-11-10 Avenue Parking.doc TO: Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission DATE: March 4, 2010 FROM: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Item 7.3 — City Parking Lot K: Possible Meter & Rate Change Meeting Date: March 11, 2010 RECOMMENDATION: Commission concurrence with staff to recommend to City Council the following: ® No immediate changes to be implemented to the current time limit and method of payment at City Lot K. ® Designation of new 2 -hour spaces after reconfiguration of City Lot K, tentatively scheduled for summer/fall of 2010. DISCUSSION: Lot K is a city parking lot located behind Burlingame Avenue, between EI Camino Real and Fox Plaza Lane. The lot has 68 spaces and is currently configured entirely as a 10 -hour parking lot. Prior to 2003, the lot was configured with 18 10 -hour spaces and 50 2 -hour spaces. Based on the findings of the Burlingame Avenue District Parking Studies (2001-2003), the lot was modified to all 10 - hour parking to provide long-term parking for Burlingame Avenue business employees. The modification also served to provide Burlingame Avenue business customers with parking time limits longer than 1 - hour, which is currently along the Avenue. Significant changes have recently occurred to the type of parking requirements needed along that end of Burlingame Avenue. Large businesses with a customer -base needing short-term parking have begun to move in. Examples of such businesses are the Walgreen's drug store and BevMo liquor store. The City recognizes the need to anticipate the on -street parking requirements resulting from these new businesses. The City, however, is also looking into business requests to increase the on -street parking time limit on Burlingame Avenue. A consideration to increase the parking limit along the Avenue would be in opposition of what is needed for the new businesses. One possible alternative would be to consider providing packers with short -term parking access to the City lots nearest to these businesses. Two such lots are in close proximity, Lot K and Lot K-1. City Lot K-1 is a small lot located directly across the street from Walgreen's, at the northwest corner of Burlingame Avenue and EI Camino Real. Lot K-1 is currently timed for 2 -hour parking. As stated above, Lot K is currently timed for 10 -hours only. It may be possible to modify Lot K so that a few 1 -hour or 2 - hour spaces can be reinstalled. In this way, both lots may be used to accommodate the short-term parking needs regardless of the ultimate parking scheme along the Avenue. The City is currently working with Caltrans on obtaining permission to construct a new driveway onto EI Camino Real from Lot K. The proposal is for aright -turn -only driveway both into and out of the lot from EI Camino Real. The Engineering staff has already obtained preliminary design approval from Caltrans on the location of the driveway and does not anticipate problems with final permit approval for construction. After receiving approval to proceed, the City will program the work for late summer or early Page 1 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.3 Lot K.doc fall of this year. The work would include potential changes to stall configuration, lot resurfacing, and restriping. The Engineering staff believes that the best time to consider a time limit modification to Lot K would be during this construction period. In the interim, staff also believes that the 2 -hour limit at Lot K-1 will be sufficient to accommodate the needs of the new businesses along that end of the Avenue. Page 2 of 2 5:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2010\3-11-10 SR -7.3 Lot K.doc u 3' 2.� I li: He ul / /- / PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL w 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 'I 1 1 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA94010w3997 1 1 01 p.m., Thursday,21011101 CouncilCa ity Hall, • -rs, 501 Primrose•.• The City of Burlingame is evaluating the following two items: CORPORATION YARD Te1:(650) 558-7670 ® Consideration to maintain the existing 1 -hour parking limit or change to a 2 - hour parking limit along Burlingame Avenue, within the business district. ® Consideration to change several 10 -hour spaces in Public Parking Lot K to 2 -hour parking spaces. As part of the evaluation process, the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission is requesting business and public comments during their meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Council Chambers. Public participation and att endance is encouraged; however, if you are unable +.� n++e� r: +hio I'+'+g9+inn end te/i�h to r,rnwi�Jc rnmmont tniritto(n rnmmr�ntc may he tV Gtt�inV tl lla7 IIIVVtllly G11 YY1a711 tV '✓/ YIaA a+ VVI/11 tivlly vYl aav 1 vvl����Ivllav � submitted by postal mail to Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. All written comments will be forwarded to the Commission if received before 5PM, March 11, 2010. S:\A Public Works DirectorylTSP CommissionlResponse &Notification Letters to Requests\Public Nolice - 3-11-10 Avenue Parking.doc