Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2008.06.16 CITY G BURUNOAME c m �NwTm.1uN[4 BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Monday June 16,2008 CLOSED SESSION— 6:15p.m.—Conference Room A a. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code § 54957.6 City Negotiators: Deirdre Dolan, Jim Nantell, Glenn Berkheimer Labor Organization: Fire Administrators b. Authorization to initiate litigation: Government Code § 54956.9(c): two items 1. CALL TO ORDER—7:00 p.m. —Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— Joint Planning/Council Meeting of May 17, 2008; Budget Study Session of May 28, 2008; and Regular Council Meeting of June 2, 2008 5. PRESENTATIONS a. Recognition of Our Lady of Angels Track Team Stars: Kerry Keighran, Sarah Gogarty, Melissa Holland and Kassi Stephenson of Burlingame Intermediate School b. Council recognition of the volunteers who conducted the 7th & 8th Grade Dance, the Day on the Green Event, the Centennial Gala and the Fireworks Show c. PG&E Rule 20—Undergrounding of Overhead Power Lines 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Adopt Ordinance revising Municipal Code Section 15.10 Sanitary Sewer Use Regulations to comply with previously adopted Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff: The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 1 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. FY 2008/2009 Community Groups Funding Requests— Discuss/Direct b. Introduce Ordinance amending Municipal Code 13.36.045 to allow motorcycles to face outward within angled parking spaces by placing either wheel within 6" of the space curb or wheel stop Introduce c. FY 2008/2009 Budget Adoption and Gann Limit Resolutions - Approve d. Introduce Ordinance for Amendment to Title 22 of the Municipal Code, the Sign Code, to exempt certain pole signs in the Shoreline (SL) District from compliance, amend maximum heights for monument signs and to correct a reference regarding wall sign area— Introduce/Discuss e. Consider two appointments to the Library Board of Trustees-Appoint 9. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center Mediation Services Contract for FY 08/09 b. Approval of Chamber of Commerce Promotional Services Contract for FY 08/09 c. Approve Out-of-State travel for Finance Director to attend Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council meeting in Kansas City d. Resolution awarding a construction contract to American Asphalt Repair &Resurfacing Co., Inc. for 2008 Street Micro-Surfacing Program e. Resolution rejecting the apparent low bid and awarding contract to Bay Area Paving for the 2007-08 Street Cuts and Patch Maintenance Project f. Approval of Labor Agreement with Fire Administrators g. Warrants and Payroll 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 12. OLD BUSINESS 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Set Appeal Hearing date for 1790 Escalante Way 2 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Planning, May 27 &June 9, 2008 b. Department Reports: Finance, May, 2008 c. Letter from Astound concerning programming prices 15. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—MONDAY, JULY 21,2008 3 Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting BURLIN ' . - UNAPPROVED MINUTES Public Works Corporation Yard— Training Room 1361 North Carolan Avenue Saturday, May 17, 2008— 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor O'Mahony called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. II. ROLL CALL A. City Council Present: Mayor O'Mahony, Vice-Mayor Keighran, Councilmembers Nagel and Deal Absent: Councilmember Baylock B. Planning Commission Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Lindstrom, Terrones, Vistica (arrived 9:10 a.m.) and Yie Absent: Chair Cauchi C. Staff Present: City Manager, Jim Nantell; Community Development Director William Meeker; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; and City Attorney, Larry Anderson III. MEETING OVERVIEW CDD Meeker gave a brief overview of the format of the meeting, noting that the Department is seeking direction for the Planning Division work program for the upcoming fiscal year. IV. STATUS OF CITY COUNCIL WORK PROGRAM ITEMS FOR PLANNING DIVISION/PLANNING COMMISSION (FY 2007-2008) CDD Meeker reviewed last year's Work Program, noting the items that have been completed and the remaining outstanding items, noting that an overview of key indicators was included in the meeting packet. He also noted that in the coming year, Planning will continue to work on the Downtown Specific Plan and begin a State-mandated update of the Housing Element of the General Plan. Comments: ■ Disappointed that nothing has been done regarding the policy for no net loss of residential units, in the last few years there have been several projects which have resulted in less units on a site, getting larger units and fewer units, should be a top priority to look at incentives for providing more units on a site. ■ The biggest hurdle to proposing more units on a site is providing the required parking, might look at allowing tandem parking as an incentive to provide more units; could look at more flexible standards, at least in the downtown area or on a transportation corridor. 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting- Unapproved Minutes May 17, 2008 ■ The size and number of units proposed to a large extent comes down to the pro forma, could ask the Economic Development Specialist to research with developers what it takes to make a project viable when it includes more units that are smaller. V. REVIEW OF DRAFT CITY COUNCIL GOALS RELATED TO PLANNING FOR FY 2008-2009 A. Create Below Market Rate Housing Options ■ This can be explored in the upcoming Housing Element update process. B. Research and Recommend Incentives to Promote Economic Development ■ The new Economic Development Specialist will come on board in June, this will be one of the first tasks to explore. C. Explore Establishment of an Art Commission ■ Would like to see opportunities to incorporate art both in the Downtown area and as a requirement for larger development projects. ■ Art Commission would require staffing, and if there is no budget, what would they do. ■ Would like to look at opportunities for the performance arts. ■ Downtown Specific Plan is an opportunity to create policies regarding public art. D. Determine City Council Expectations Regarding Sustainability Recommendations ■ Refer to discussion under Item VI.B. E. Research and Recommend Options for Better Use of City-Owned Parking Lots • Use of City-owned parking lots, whether as a public/private partnership for development which would include City parking or to enhance landscaping and open space will be part of the discussions and policies developed as part of the Downtown Specific Plan. F. Consider Creating Opportunities for Public Education Forums ■ Don't see the need for events with speakers like you see in Redwood City, but would like opportunities for public education by staff on topical issues related to major Planning initiative such as the Downtown Specific Plan and the Housing Element, can incorporate into the work programs for these items. VI. ADDITIONAL SUGGESTED WORK PROGRAM ITEMS A. Consider Implementation of Recommendations of the Green Ribbon Task Force ■ Gave direction to the Green Ribbon Task Force to pursue the items for further study outlined in their recommendations. Suggested that Kathleen Gallagher be brought in as a staff resource to help formulate recommendations, she has worked with other jurisdictions. 2 CITY OF BURLINGAME Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting- Unapproved Minutes May 17, 2008 ■ When the recommendations are refined, should be brought to the Planning Commission for review. B. Revisit the Provisions of the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance ■ Gave direction to look at this issue as a part of the Housing Element update which is already a part of the work program for upcoming fiscal year. C. Review the City's Appeals Procedures for Planning Commission Actions ■ Don't see that many appeals now, could require the applicant to give reason. ■ State law requires that there be an option to appeal a Planning Commission decision. ■ Fees will go up in July to reflect cost of processing, this may discourage frivolous appeals. D. Research and Consider Adoption of a Solar Access Ordinance ■ Can be a conflict when second story addition is installed next to a house with solar panels, but can also be an issue with trees, always a balancing act. ■ State law restricts regulations on solar panels based on aesthetics, aren't seeing a lot of solar installations in Burlingame, want to make sure it is encouraged, current process is working. ■ Technology is improving so newer installations aren't as massive as was seen in the past, Green Ribbon Task Force can look into current regulations and how to implement, provide information on website to explain process. E. Research and Consider Adoption of Property Maintenance Standards for Private Properties ■ Concern is with maintenance of property storefronts and overgrown fields, can we require maintenance. ■ Staff noted that the weed abatement program was significantly reduced with budget cuts four or five years ago, is now enforced as a fire code violation; will be working on an administrative citation policy next year, can pursue as code enforcement item. VII. OTHER DISCUSSION TOPICS A. Consider Videotaping Planning Commission Meetings ■ Will cost about$15,000 a year to implement, would not be fair to impose a surcharge on application fees to cover costs, some items are on the consent calendar, so would be very little air time, while more controversial projects may require many hours of discussion. ■ Want the information available to the community, but don't want to increase fees, can look into next year, in the meantime can look into what it would take to post staff reports and audio recordings of the meetings on the website. 3 CITY OF BURLINGAME Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting- Unapproved Minutes May 17, 2008 B. Update Regarding Number of Food Service Uses within the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area, Subarea A ■ Given that the Downtown Specific Plan will address land use issues for the Downtown area, it was determined that no changes would be made to the zoning regulations for food establishments in Subarea A of Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area at this time. C. View Protection Policy in the Hillside Area ■ Concern with how landscaping comes into play when reviewing additions in the Hillside Area, need to balance view protection with tree policies, the Planning Commission considers these impacts when reviewing projects. ■ Staff noted that the Beautification Commission came up with a policy a few years ago to address conflicts between neighbors with regard to trees and views, will provide a copy of that policy to Council members. VIII. FROM THE FLOOR Susan Castner-Paine, 728 Concord Way, Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Michael Barber, 1316 Palm Drive; Patricia Gray, 1616 Adeline Drive; Mike McCord, 209 Bloomfield Road, John Root, 728 Crossway Road, and Mike Kerwin, 3105 Margarita Avenue, spoke. ■ When reviewing projects, should limit the amount of area devoted to grass, promote the use of drip irrigation and drought tolerant landscaping, promote the use of gray water for irrigation, should offer classes in xeriscape; look at planting trees that are carbon sequestering, land around the treatment facility could be planted with marsh grasses to purify water. ■ Should only consider allowing second units on larger parcels. ■ Support a "percent for Art"program, encourage formation of an Art Commission. ■ Should stick with current appeal procedures so people will feel they are getting a fair process. ■ Should track the loss of rental versus condominium units, when looking at the rate for affordable units should include the cost of condominium association fees. ■ Support the work being done by the Green Ribbon Task Force, have found ways to use solar on school buildings, could look at for City buildings, process for solar can be minimized by providing information to people up front. ■ When looking at funding arts should also look at the opportunity to create public space. ■ Need to find a way to provide free public transportation locally to reduce the use of cars, need east-west connections. ■ Support providing more housing units to provide opportunities for people to live and work here rather than to drive here to work. 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting- Unapproved Minutes May 17, 2008 ■ Downtown Specific Plan Citizens Advisory Committee has spent a lot of time refining ideas, hope that when gets to Planning Commission and City Council there is an understanding of what went into the process. ■ City should be making sure that it is easy for residents to implement green choices. ■ Ask that Green Ribbon Task Force be given a chance to pursue the additional recommended tasks. IX. ESTABLISHMENT OF WORK PLAN PRIORITIES FOR THE FY 2008-2009 PLANNING DIVISION/PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM ■ It was determined that the following items would be folded into the ongoing Downtown Specific Plan work program: Look at options for better use of City-owned parking lots. - Encourage public art with new development. Include community education forums as part of major planning initiatives. ■ It was determined that the following items would be considered as a part of the Housing Element update to be completed this fiscal year: - Revisit the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and explore the creation of more below- market rate housing options. Develop a policy and proposed regulations to ensure "No Net Loss"of residential units when new development occurs and explore ways to incentivize the construction of additional units. - Update condominium regulations. ■ It was determined that the following will be priorities for the new part-time Economic Development Specialist - Create an Economic Development program for the City. - Research and recommend incentives to promote Economic Development. X. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m. 5 MC ii-b BURLINGAME c' 9 Msr[o we 6 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Budget Study Session May 28, 2008 CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed Budget Study Session of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the Lane Community Room of the Main Library. Mayor Rosalie M. O'Mahony called the meeting to order at 6 p.m. All Council members were present. I. OPENING COMMENTS CM Nantell provided the opening remarks and stated that there are no significant cuts in service even though in the recent past the City has not been able to balance ongoing revenues with ongoing operating expenditures; additionally, the City has not been able to meet the goal of contributing $4 million to support Capital Improvement Project funding. II. OVERVIEW OF CITY COUNCIL GOALS CM Nantell reviewed the new list of Council goals replacing Page 2 of the Proposed FY 2008-09 Budget. III. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED FY 2008-09 BUDGET FinDir Nava provided highlights of the Proposed FY 2008-09 Budget which increased 11%overall. IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND FIVE-YEAR PLAN DPW Murtuza gave an overview of Capital Improvement Projects and the Five Year Plan. Mayor O'Mahony stated that there is a need for a proactive plan for maintaining sidewalks and streets. V. DEPARTMENT BUDGET REPORTS Each department gave highlights of their FY 2008-09 budget proposal. Mayor O'Mahony suggested that staff explore the ability of the Sisters of Mercy and Peninsula Hospital picking up more of the costs of the north end shuttle service to split costs with the City. FinDir Nava stated that the Council Chambers audio upgrades are complete; however, more work is to be done. Astound will provide internet service at no charge to the City to enable Granicus to complete connection of their equipment. Web streaming capability is expected in mid to late summer depending on 1 Burlingame City Council May 28,2008 Unapproved Minutes completion of equipment connections. Councilwoman Nagel asked if there is a possibility of televising more meetings through public access TV. FinDir Nava stated that possibly PenTV would broadcast some meetings depending on available funding. In response to Vice Mayor Keighran, FinDir Nava stated that approximately $20,000 has been collected so far as a result of the business license tax amnesty period which ends May 30, 2008. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS John Root, 728 Crossway Road, spoke on various subjects. VII. COMMUNITY AGENCIES FUNDING REQUESTS Mayor O'Mahony stated that Council has received copies of community agencies' funding requests and will provide FinDir Nava with their 2008-09 funding recommendations for approval in June. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting at 8:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 2 Burlingame City Council May 28,2008 Unapproved Minutes CITY C BURLJNGAME 415- V®r...e- BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of June 2, 2008 STUDY SESSION a. DRAFT INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES FOR DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN CDD Meeker reviewed the staff report and presented Council with the Draft Inventory of Historic Resources in preparation for the Downtown Specific Plan. Due to the time, public comments were continued to the regular Council meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Rosalie M. O'Mahony called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Pat Harding. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Deal, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to approve the minutes of the May 19, 2008 regular Council meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. STUDY SESSION (continued) a. DRAFT INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES FOR DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN Mayor O'Mahony requested comments from Council at this time. Council comments are as follows: in the past we have shortchanged historic resources in this city; CEQA requires you to look at historic aspects of projects; historic value may be considered in submitting future plans; financial burden would be on owners; last historic study prepared in 1982; tax benefit available to historic property owners; we need to take care of this historic community. From the floor, Katie O'Brien, 2204 Poppy Drive, spoke on the subject. There were no further comments from the floor. 1 Burlingame City Council June 2, 2008 Unapproved Minutes 5. PRESENTATIONS a. PROCLAMATIONS COMMEMORATING CITY CENTENNIAL FROM THE OFFICES OF SENATOR BARBARA BOXER, CONGRESSWOMAN JACKIE SPEIER, SENATOR LELAND YEE, AND ASSEMBLYMAN GENE MULLIN AND VARIOUS OTHER AGENCIES Mayor O'Mahony introduced Senator Yee who presented the City of Burlingame with a Senate Resolution commemorating Burlingame's 100th anniversary. Sarah Phelps presented the City with a proclamation from Assemblyman Gene Mullin who was not able to attend the meeting. Senator Boxer's representative was not able to attend this meeting to present their proclamation; and Mayor O'Mahony stated that all resolutions and proclamations received commemorating our Centennial would be on display in the atrium of the Hyatt Regency Hotel during the Centennial Gala on June 6, 2008. Mayor O'Mahony stated that Comerica Bank officially opened its doors in Burlingame on May 29 and contributed $10,000 to the Centennial Gala to become a Gold Sponsor of the event. Mayor O'Mahony introduced Comerica Bank's District Manager, Kathy Hedges, and Assistant Manager, Karina Zhang. The Mayor also thanked Mario Del Puerto, Manager of the Burlingame branch, who was not able to attend this meeting. P&RD Schwartz stated that Congresswoman Jackie Speier was not able to attend this meeting and will try to attend the Gala to present the U.S. flag that flew over the Capitol in Washington, D.C. to be flown at the Burlingame Train Station. P&RD Schwartz also stated that over 500 reservations have been made for the Gala thus far. b. INTRODUCTION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST, PATRICIA LOVE CDD Meeker introduced the new Economic Development Specialist, Patricia Love, to Council. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1824 RENEWING BROADWAY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) FOR FIVE YEARS; AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 46-2008 ESTABLISHING 2008-2009 ASSESSMENTS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No. 1824 renewing the Broadway Area BID for five years. Mayor O'Mahony opened the public hearing. Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill Drive, spoke on the subject. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Keighran made a motion to approve Resolution No. 46-2008 establishing 2008-2009 assessments for the Broadway Area Business Improvement District; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance No. 1824 renewing the Broadway Area Business Improvement District for five years; seconded by Vice Mayor Keighran. The motion was 2 Burlingame City Council June 2, 2008 Unapproved Minutes approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor O'Mahony directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. b. PUBLIC HEARING ON FY 2008-09 PROPOSED BUDGET AND CAPITAL PROGRAM FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing on the Proposed Budget and Capital Program for FY 2008-2009. Mayor O'Mahony opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Wynn Grcich, Union City; and John Root, 728 Crossway Road. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Budget adoption is scheduled for June 16, 2008. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill Drive, spoke on water costs; Mark Grandcolas, 754 Walnut Avenue, and Ramona Martinez, 709 Walnut Avenue, spoke on PG&E not upgrading their equipment which causes power outages in their neighborhood. Wynn Grcich, Union City, spoke on water quality and infrastructure. John Root, 728 Crossway Road, spoke on the new Economic Development Specialist position. Stephen Hamilton, 105 Crescent Drive, spoke on the need for the Downtown Specific Plan group to coordinate with the Safeway group on parking issues in the downtown Burlingame Avenue area. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on water quality. There were no further comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE REVISING BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE 15.10 SANITARY SEWER USE REGULATIONS TO COMPLY WITH THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED SANITARY SEWER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP) DPW Murtuza reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance for compliance with the Sanitary Sewer Management Plan. Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 15.10 of the Municipal Code to clarify rights and responsibilities regarding the Sanitary Sewer System. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilwoman Nagel requested removal of Item a. from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. 3 Burlingame City Council June 2, 2008 Unapproved Minutes b. RESOLUTION NO. 47-2008 APPROVING A REVOCABLE UTILITY EASEMENT IN PARKING LOT B-1 FOR OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT AT 1427 CHAPIN DPW Murtuza requested Council approve Resolution No. 47-2008 approving conveyance of a revocable utility easement over Parking Lot B-1 (Chapin Avenue) for utility access to 1427 Chapin Avenue and authorizing the City Manager to execute conveyance on behalf of the city. C. AMEND THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH CAINE COMPUTER CONSULTING, LLC; APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 48-2008 AMENDING THE AGREEMENT COP Van Etten requested Council approve Resolution No. 48-2008 authorizing Amendment No. 1 to agreement for professional services between the City of Burlingame and Caine Computer Consulting, LLC. Vice Mayor Keighran made a motion to approve Items b. and c. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. a. RECOMMENDATION TO CANCEL JULY 7 AND AUGUST 4, 2008 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS At Councilwoman Nagel's request, CC Mortensen confirmed that the second regular Council meetings in July and August would remain as scheduled. Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to approve Item a. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. Mayor O'Mahony asked for Old Business next. 12. OLD BUSINESS Referring to the Study Session on Historic Resources Inventory, Mayor O'Mahony requested that the remainder of the A group be informed and asked to respond with their comments, whether pro or con. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa Avenue, commented on the Airport Roundtable and thanked the City Attorney for his service to this community. There were no further comments from the floor. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. SCHEDULING OF JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION AND SAFEWAY WORKING GROUP Council agreed to schedule the Joint Meeting on Tuesday, August 19, 2008. 4 Burlingame City Council June 2,2008 Unapproved Minutes • b. SCHEDULE MEETING WITH COUNCIL AND RECRUITER CONCERNING CITY ATTORNEY RECRUITMENT At CM Nantell's request, this item was deferred to the Closed Session following this meeting. Councilwoman Nagel requested that the CM Nantell prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature addressed to PG&E on behalf of the citizens on Walnut Avenue requesting that PG&E upgrade their equipment. Councilman Deal asked staff to consider providing pitchers of water instead of plastic bottled water for Council during their meetings. He also asked about alternatives to using Styrofoam products and plastic bags by Burlingame businesses. Councilwoman Baylock stated that the Green Ribbon Task Force is currently looking at alternatives to these products, but according to local businesses, suppliers are difficult to locate. Councilwoman Nagel stated that these issues already may be part of the proposals that the task force will be presenting to Council in the near future. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, April 15, 2008; Parks &Recreation, May 15, 2008 b. City Librarian Report of May 20, 2008 15. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting to Closed Session at 8:55 p.m. CLOSED SESSION Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: a. Personnel Matter: Recruitment of City Attorney(Government Code §54957) b. Schedule Meeting with Council and Recruiter Concerning City Attorney Recruitment 16. ADJOURNMENT Following the Closed Session, Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting at 9:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council June 2,2008 Unapproved Minutes dRUNGAM a,A f . PROCLAMATION HONORING PPSL TRACK AND FIELD CHAMPIONSHIP STARS - 2008 Whereas, The Peninsula Parish School League (PPSL) was founded by the late Vicc Mangini,long- time Our Lady ofAngels Parishioner and four-time Mayor ofBurbi4ame;and Whereas, Vic Mangini was a legendary track coach at Burlingame High School m the 1950's through the 1980's;and Whereas, This year's PPSL was the 53rd consecutive, annual school event;and Whereas, PPSL has been using Fully Automatic Timing, the same used m Olympic track races; and Whereas, The newrecord for 7' Grade Girls 4 by 400 relaym 2008 was won in 4.•33.•63;and Whereas, The 2008 team of Kerry Keighran (OLA), Sarah Gogarty (OLA, Melissa Holland (OLA),and Kassi Stephenson (BIS)surpass the last OLA Champions In 2004: Theresa Woods,JoEllen Galligan, Amanda Boyle and jennifer Carey;and Whereas, Kerry Keighran and Kassi Stephenson also hold the 6' Grade Girls 4 by 400 record for 2007;and Whereas, Kassi Stephenson has just completed seventh grade at Burlingame Intermediate School (BIS)and enjoys music and spending time with good friends;and Whereas, Kassi's fa voritc sport is running;she ran cross-country for BIS and ran track for OLA and BIS, she also plays soccer with AYSO and basketball at BIS;and Whereas,Kassiplans to attend Burlingame High School and looks forward to runningfor the BHS track team. Now, Therefore, I, Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor of the City of Burlingame, do recognise and congratulate Kassi Stephenson for her participation m the PPSL T rack and Field Championship. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal ofthc City of BurAngamc to be aFfixed this 16' day ofJune 2008. ----------------------------- Rosahc M. O'Mahony, Mayor E3 �+ NGAME PROCLAMATION HONORING PPSL TRACK AND FIELD CHAMPIONSHIP STARS - 2008 Whereas, The Peninsula Parish School League (PPSL) was founded by the late Vice Mangiru;long- time Our Lady,ofAngels Parishioner and four-time Mayor olRurlingarne;and Whereas, Vic Mangini was a legendary, track coach at Burlingame High Schoolin the 1950's through the 1980's;and Whereas, This year's PPSL was the 53rd consecutive, annual school event;and Whereas, PPSL has been using Tully Automatic Timing, the same used m Olympic track races; and Whereas, The newrecord for 7' Grade Girls 4 by 400 relay m 2008 was won m 4:33.•63;and Whereas, The 2008 team of Kerry Keighran (OLA), Sarah Gogarty (OLA, Melissa Holland (OLA), and Kassi Stephenson (BIS)surpass the last OLA Champions m 2004- Theresa Woods,JoEllen GaUigan, Amanda Boyle and Jennifer Carey,and Whereas, Kcrzy Keighran and Kassi Stephenson also hold the 6' Grade Girls 4 by 400 record from 2007;and Whereas, KerryKcighran's favorite subjects are math and literature;her best-loved sport is track, second to her love for Irish Dancing. Kerry competed at the World Irish Dance Championships rn Glasgow, Scotland m 2007;and Whereas, Kerry hopes to attend Saint Ignatius High or Mercy Burlingame High to prepare to become a prosecuting attorney and possiblygo into politics, following m her mother's footsteps. Now, Therefore, I, Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor of the City of Burlingame, do recognize and congratulate KerryKeighran forherparticipation rn the PPSL Track and Field Championship. In witness whereof, Ihave hereunto setmyhand and caused the seal of the City ofBurlingame to be affixed this 16' day ol'June 2008. ----------------------------- Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor BU.RLIING ME a PROCLAMATION HONORING PPSL TRACK AND FIELD CHAMPIONSHIP STARS - 2008 Whereas, The Peninsula Parish School League(PPSL)was founded by the late Vice Mangini,long- time Our Lady ofAngels Parishioner and four-time Mayor ofBurlirrgame;and Whereas, Vic Mangim was a legendary track coach at Burlingame High Schoolin the 1950's through the 1980's;and Whereas, This year's PPSL was the 53rd consecutive, annual school event;and Whereas, PPSL has been using Fully Automatic Tuning, the same used in Olympic track races; and Whereas, 1 he newrecord for 7' Grade Girls 4 by 400 relaym 2008 was won in 4:33:63;and Whereas, The 2008 team of Kerry Kerghran (OLA), Sarah Gogarty (OLA, Melissa Holland (OLA),and Kassi Stephenson (BIS)surpass the last OLA Champions m 2004• Theresa Woods,JoEllen Galligan,Amanda Boyle and jenin er Carey;and Whereas, Sarah Gogartyis a member ofa Club Basketball Team and plays soccer,and Whereas, Sara's favorite subject is history, and her fa vorite sport is track, which she finds highly, competitive;and Whereas, Sarah hopes to transfer to either Saint Ignatius High or Saint Francis High. Now, Therefore, I, Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor of the City of Burlingame, do recognize and congratulate Sarah Gogartyforherparbicipation in the PPSL Track and Field Championship. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set myhand and caused the seal of the City ofBurlingame to be affxed this 16' day ofjune 2008. ---------------------------- Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor 81,.1Ri.tVGAM11 lwwuo PROCLAMATION HONORING PPSL TRACK AND FIELD CHAMPIONSHIP STARS - 2008 Whereas, The Peninsula Parish School League (PPSL)was founded bythe late Vice Mag&,,,long- time Our Lady ofAngels Parishioner and four-time Mayor of BurhiVarne;and Whereas, Vic Mangmi was a legendary track coach at Burlingame High School in the 1950's through the 1980's;and Whereas, This year's PPSL was the 53rd consecutive, annual school event;and Whereas, PPSL has been using fully Automatic Timing, the same used m Olympic track races; and Whereas, The new record for 7' Grade Girls 4 by 400 relay in 2008 was won m 4:33.•63;and Whereas, The 2008 team of Kerry Keighran (OLA), Sarah Gogarty (OLA, Melissa Holland (OLA), and Kassi Stephenson (BIS)surpass the last OLA Champions m 2004.- Theresa Woods,JoEllen Galligan,Amanda Boyle and jennifer Carey,and Whereas, Melissa Holland plays club volleyball and basketball;and Whereas, Melissa has just completed seventh grade at OLA. Now, Therefore, I, RosaLe M. O'Mahony, Mayor of the City of Burlingame, do recognize and conwmtulate Melissa Holland for her participation in the PPSL Track and Field Championship. In witness whereof, Ihave hereunto setmyhand and caused the seal of the City ofBurliagame to be of m- cd this 16' day ofJune 2008. ----------------------------- Rosalie M. O'Mahony, Mayor BURLI GAME STAFF REPORT AGENDA j,, ITEM# 5 , MTG. DATE 6/16/08 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL suBWTTED BY C DATE: March 4, 2008 APPRO FROM: Parks & Recreation Director (558-7307) By SUBJECT: COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF THE VOLUNTE RS WHO CONDUCTED THE 7TH& 8TH GRADE DANCE, THE DAY ON THE GREEN EVENT, THE CENTENNIAL GALA AND THE FIREWORKS SHOW RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council recognize all of the volunteers that made the final portion of the City's Centennial celebration a tremendous success with a 7h& 8`}' grade dance, Day on the Green event, Centennial Gala and a fireworks show. BACKGROUND: When the Centennial Events Committee discussed ways to complete the celebration, the idea surfaced of a grand ball. Recognizing that Burlingame's youth would be interested in participating in the celebration but not necessarily in the grand ball, a special 7"'& 8"'grade dance and a music concert for high school students were suggested. On May 16th,the Burlingame Youth Advisory Committee conducted the dance and on May 18th they held the Day on the Green(DOTG) event at Burlingame High School. DOTG gave eight youth bands a venue to play while approximately 200 teens listened to the music, enjoyed the food, played on the inflatable games and learned about local non-profit organizations. The YAC coordinated the project with both the Burlingame Police Department(BPD)and Central County Fire Department (CCFD) and obtained lots of sponsorships from local businesses. In short, they did a great job. Karen Key worked for over a year to create the Centennial Gala at the Hyatt Regency Hotel that was conducted on June 6th and the effort showed. Assisted by Susan Burlison and dozens of volunteers, Karen was involved in every detail of the evening from invitations to centerpieces; from scripts to favors; from wine to song. She worked with emcee Diane Dwyer, headliner Danny Marona, the sound technicians, the hotel staff and Comcasts crews. Over 600 attended the Gala and walked away knowing that Burlingame can do it right. Another idea that the Committee agreed upon from the beginning was to end the year-long celebration with a fireworks show. Gordon Gottsche, from Burlingame's Public Works Department, stepped forward and volunteered to coordinate the show. Gordon pulled together the bids, worked with the vendor to produce the show, coordinated the show with BPD and CCFD and arranged for the music CD's. Known as "Boom-Boom"to the Committee members, Gordon lived up to the title by giving us a spectacular show that will not be soon forgotten. BUDGET IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None 1... 1l � ? 0 Pro � r�im Conversion of Overhqpd to Underground Facilities Program Overview i!11,InI h . AW -v C o 90 °. ° CL � o 0 CD c CD 0- (�!� _�' N N C) o U o 3 oo 1% 90 CD CD I cn � � _ _0 3. o o � � o o (n. U) vi V C CD D O QL CD CL CD CD .N) CD n c O — '- 07 CD p CD -. N -. CD O 0 �- r-+- (n -+ CD CD O O CD Q 0 O W M CD CD p C� C p u .--f- CD Cn — CD C 3 p ' O . -t- CD �C � CD � � 0 CD0 �F =r �•; 3 om CD w r--l- m M ((D C: C) 3 -. c: 0 M p 0 -� CO —• C7 � � O O C� O =; p CD — 3 Cn —• -� Cn CD -0 -. (n — CD O — O O � I N CM M -' 0 CD Cn CD M — Q 0 t, ^� • ,Y O rt n (D O 0 v 3 `` O m O F � O :3- D W v c t 0 o I (D (a (D �- 00 p D flJ (D OO Q (D (Q v C: `< (7 O C) (D Q cr (D CL -� C—QX 0. --+.#C) O Q (nOO v N toN N < D :Dcr < QC37 0CQ O — CD O O -O (D (7 CQ O O (D N � N v iU r+ M `< v (D (D (D Q p (n n• ,_+ �. 3 (n v o � 3o2rn o° v C Q � _ -. (D (n Q p n' C) 0 3 o (n � 3 (n 3 m 0 _N 0 OU) -j < (c -1 :7 � CD 0- ---F, � :3 (D CD z- (D o (D . � -p CD CD C: O CD _� CD 0 su (D U) C: n M < � -z �< — -z CD — CD W CD Q CD �' CSD Sv CSD CSD -s CD w• O CD< OO CD CQ O Q �• _-�, -•s cl O n C7 O 0 ilk O � r-+ CQ p a)CD W CL) • CD CCD CL CCD = CD O- QL cn CD O LU p n O 5 5 --ti —• C7 CD �- CD O w Q (O Q O _0 �- o o O �' Cn U) i r+ 0- i i CD r=+ G) c- 0 O� 0 < �• � �U CD CDS CD � �' * CCD O (Q CD r-r• '_+ :3 (Q CD CD Sv Q -1 :7 O CD CCD ` � < `� O- O CD CD CD a �. CD CD � `< �. CD -� CO a) (n C7 L� Q < CD CD CD cn Sv r+ O — O O X �. O -a c = m � r+ _, cn CD cn CD 3 cD n• (n tOj T p CD n (D O < 0• CD —. �-t- Qo m p nCL (D CD Cn CSD ch (n Cn Cn cn Q CD CD O' - _ O r-t- n• p O `< (D 2 (n00 -� cn � CD c• < C7 cn CD 0- 0 C QT. m M.cn m c cn ( D 0 C (n (n • � CD (D 0- M .-f cr 0- (D 0- (n O O Q C7 " CQ Q CO M 00WCD 0 r-t- O OCD � n � (n CD CD (n cD (D 0 � ' tn � n -� � � O- � C � Q W (n 0 0 CD m � OV ° � (nW P-o OW � � � U) CD0_ U) 0 o°. 0 � Cr 0 �• CD cn ^ 0 -3 � � 0 007- c M c cn � 0 < 0 cn 0 — -� D -� V cin � � °° � ccnn (DCn' Q`< C3� � �'� �- CO (n r•-+• Q C310 cn CD CO Sv CSD 0 cn CD 0 �. � � '-' w � � cn Q. CD 00 -• 0 CD m 0- 7- 0 O (DCDCDX (n CDcn• 3w (n 0 cn 0 �+ • ,--f- �- CD � (n-- 0 o35. � M (D � cn (D ° 0 Q!) �•� 0 cn cn rt- r-4- �,� CD n Q Off. 0 < O — � 0cn c - OCD 3 CD cn CD 0 — 4 -0 cn m o ° o � O . � — (n CD — Q° � sv — CD 0- 0 � O O �• < O CD CCD CD O < 1 (D CD• • O CD (Q O. �• O (n CD OX• C: CD - o Q (D (n O O Q r+ p CD c Q O- Q° (D << mcn - �+ CD --+, (D n p O CD O (on CQ (n 10 ,—�-~ CD m CD `< 0- ((D N , O CD �L 1 • t �� • • _ • t ► `z • 3 • , • 1 • • «? L / 1CD (n • /, L ■ • • �� 1 t 1 • • • • 1CD • �z t �� • L • t Q) t 1 • f7 , � ;iti i '�Il�ll��ld � i r) L1B ��JJf1 �i, II���j�ju ll���i; '��� ��l ly��l�ll ���1,I,IJI! Agenda 6a Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: June 16, 2008 ` SUBMITTED BY GGni APPROVED BY /U TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL it DATE: June 1, 2008 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE REVISING BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE 15.10 SANITARY SEWER USE REGULATIONS TO COMPLY WITH PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED SANITARY SEWER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold a public hearing to: 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. Direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: On October 15, 2007, the Council adopted the SSMP in accordance with State General Waste Discharge Regulations. The SSMP describes the plans, methods, policies and standards to effectively operate and maintain the sanitary sewer system to reduce sanitary sewer overflows. Further, it includes the procedures for reporting sewage spills and procedures for emergency response plan. As part of the SSMP, the City is required to update the sewer ordinance to be in compliance with State requirements by July 1, 2008. DISCUSSION: The SSMP identified three specific areas where the City's Municipal Code needs revision to meet the State requirements as follows: • Limiting the discharge of fats, oils, and grease and other debris that may cause blockages. • Requiring that sanitary sewer facilities and connections be designed and constructed in accordance with standards established by the City Engineer. • Ensuring access for maintenance, inspection, or repairs for portions of the sewer system owned or maintained by the City. BUDGET IMPACT: None. EXHIBITS: Ordinance C: City Clerk, City Attorney SAA Public Works Directory\Staff ReportsWdopt SSMP Ordinance Change.doc 1 ORDINANCE No. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY RIGHTS 3 AND RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 Section 1. The current sewer regulations were adopted in 2000 and have the served the 7 City well. However, some revision is necessary to clearly require that side sewers, those sewer 8 lines running between a building and the sewer main,must conform to the requirements of the City 9 as determined by the Director of Public Works. In addition, some persons have assumed that the 10 City is responsible for maintenance of all or a part of the these side sewers;however,the City has 11 only provided emergency service to clear the lateral sewer, which is the sewer line between the 12 property line and the sewer main,and has not accepted maintenance or repair responsibility for the 1 lateral sewer or any other portion of the side sewer. This ordinance makes clear that the City only 14 maintains or repairs lateral sewers that are in full compliance with all City and other requirements 15 and only when the City has expressly agreed to provide this maintenance or repair. The ordinance 16 further provides that acceptance of sewer service from the City entitles the City to enter the 17 property receiving the service to inspect, repair, or otherwise work on the lateral sewer to that 18 property. Finally, the ordinance makes clear that deposit of fats, oils, or grease in the sanitary 19 sewer system is prohibited. -)0 21 Section 2. A new Section 15.10.024 is added to read as follows: 22 15.10.24 Planning, design, and construction standards. 2 Public sewers and side sewers shall be planned, designed, constructed, installed, and 24 repaired in accordance with the plans and specifications established by the director of public works. 26 Section 3. Section 15.10.032 is amended to read as follows: 27 15.10.032 Maintenance of sewer laterals. 28 (a) The city shall not be responsible for maintenance or repair of any lateral sewer unless I the lateral sewer conforms to all of the requirements of this chapter and other applicable city regulations and the city has expressly determined to provide this maintenance or repair. (b) The city shall have the right to enter onto private property for the purpose of inspection, 4 maintenance, repair,rehabilitation, or replacement of the portion of the lateral sewer that may be maintained by the city. 6 7 Section 4. Subsection 15.10.038(c) is amended to read as follows: 8 (c) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged to a public sewer any waste, 9 including any fats,oils,or grease,that creates a stoppage,plugging,breakage,any reduction in the 10 sewer capacity, or any other damage to sewers or sewerage facilities of the city. 11 12 Section 5. Subsection 15.10.040(c) (Specifically prohibited wastes) is amended to read 13 as follows: 14 (c) Any solids or viscous substances of such size or in such quantity that they may cause 15 flow obstruction in any part of the sewer or be detrimental to proper wastewater treatment plant 16 operations. Such substances include but are not limited to, asphalt, cement, dead animals, offal, 17 ashes, sand, mud, straw, industrial process shavings, metal, glass, rages, feathers, tar, plastics, 18 wood, whole blood, paunch manure, bones, hair and fleshings, entrails, fats, oils, grease, paper 19 dishes,paper cups,milk containers,or similar paper products,either whole or ground,and resins; 20 or 21 22 Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 23 24 Mayor 25 26 I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 27 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2"d day 28 of June, 2008, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2 I day of 2008, by the following vote: 2 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 5 6 City Clerk 7 1):AFILES\ORDINANC\sewerREGS2008.pwd.wpd 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 .1 4 CITjYo, STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 8a MTG. MCD' 9D DAATED J HE m DATE June 16,2008 � TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BY: DATE: June 10,2008 APP VED BY: FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: FY 2008-09 Community Groups Funding Requests RECOMMENDATION: That Council review funding requests and decide the appropriate amount to grant these agencies. BACKGROUND: The City Council has funded community organizations that provide services to San Mateo County and Burlingame residents. In FY07-08, the Council approved$53,283 in funding for 16 community agencies. The Finance Department issued a Notice of Funding Availability on March 18, 2008. The deadline for submitting the one-page application was April 18, 2008. The City received funding applications from 13 agencies totaling $56,450. The FY08-09 Proposed Budget appropriates $54,000 for community group funding allocations. Two agencies submitted their requests after the application deadline: CALL Primrose Center and Mission Hospice. One agency, Sustainable San Mateo, did not submit an application, but submitted a letter to the city requesting funding in the amount of$3,000. The letter was dated May 8, 2008. They received $1,614 in FY07-08. Attachment A. lists the funding awards for the last three fiscal years. In addition, it summarizes the agency requests for FY07-08. The funding request letters were provided at the City Council budget study session. The letter from Sustainable San Mateo is enclosed for your consideration. Councilmembers were provided with a tabulation worksheet that can be used to make individual funding recommendations. The results will be made available at the City Council meeting. Attachment A. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY GROUP FUNDING Community Group FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Status Final Award Final Award Final Award Requests CALL Primrose Center $ 4,589 $ 4,801 $ 5,006 $ 7,500 Late with explanation Center for Independence of Disabled $ 1,251 $ 1,341 $ 1,396 $ - No application received Community Gatepath $ 4,172 $ 4,317 $ 4,502 $ 5,000 Human Investment Project $ 1,669 $ 1,789 $ 1,863 $ 5,000 Mission Hospice $ 1,669 $ 1,789 $ 1,863 $ 2,000 Late with explanation PARCA $ 1,669 $ 1,848 $ 1,944 $ 2,000 Samaritan House $ 6,674 $ 7,038 $ 7,417 $ 7,500 Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County $ 2,086 $ 2,136 $ 2,223 $ 2,500 YFA Crisis Intervention Center $ 2,086 $ 2,146 $ 2,187 $ 2,250 Shelter Network $ 4,172 $ 4,655 $ 4,843 $ 5,000 Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse $ 2,920 $ 3,099 $ 3,180 $ 5,000 Burlingame Community Theatre $ 2,920 $ - $ - $ - Sustainable San Mateo County $ 1,251 $ 1,551 $ 1,614 $ - Late letter in lieu of application YMCA Youth Service Bureau FOCYS - No application received ( ) $ 3,337 $ 3,416 $ 3,554 $ pp Safe Harbor(Winter Shelter) $ 6,674 $ 7,207 $ 7,496 $ 7,500 Burlingame Historical Society $ 3,000 $ 3,113 $ 3,143 $ 3,200 Ombudsman Program of San Mateo $ 1,000 $ 1,012 $ 1,054 $ 2,000 Peninsula Girls Chorus $ - $ 200 $ - $ - Totals: $ 51,138 $ 51,458 $ 53,283 $ 56,450 Request Table.xls 6/10/20083:09 PM Sustainable (650)638-2323 • Fax: (650)341-1395 San Mateo County 177 Bovet Road,Sixth Floor,San Mateo,CA 94402 E-mail:advocate@sustainablesanmateo.org Economy. Equity. Environment. Web:www.sustainablesonmateo.org Dedicated to the long-term health and vitality of our region May 8, 2008 Founder MARCIA PAGELS Mr. James Nantell, City Manager BOARD OF DIRECTORS City of Burlingame Chair 501 Primrose Road RUTH PETERSON Burlingame, CA 94010 Vice Chair PATRICK BURT Secretary Dear Mr. Nantell, BETH BHATNAGAR Treasurer Public interest has never been stronger as it relates to sustainability more THOMAS ROUNDS particularly in the area of global warming. However, the other two "E's" in WARD DANNER sustainability are equally important—the Economy and social Equity. GLADWYN D'SOUZA Sustainable San Mateo County (SSMC) is proud to fill the vital role of ROSALYN Koo educating our community about all three aspects of sustainability by JEANNENE MINNIX providing fact-based information about our county's environment, economy COLLEEN MCAVOY and society and their interconnectedness. MARCIA PAGELS WILLIAM SCHULTE ' We are asking for the City of Burlingame's support by investing$3,000 for STEPHANI SCOTT the production of the Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County,2009 Report SAPNA SINGH Card. This annual report has proven to be an invaluable resource to your city ADVISORYCOUNCIL and community. JILL BOONE JULIA BOTT Councilmember Richard Merk of Portola Valley highly regarded the 2007 ToCRONIN EVANG LINTo BURGESS report and said, "Some things I get and throw away, some things 1 get and read, RICHARD GORDON but this [Indicators Report]I read and keep!" July 25, 2007. JERRY HILL ANNE HINCKLE Peter Sharer, CEO of startup company Agilewaves recently said of the report, DAVID HINCKLE "Agilewaves used the 2006 Indicators Report both as supporting documentation for RO KHANNA the value of our home utility monitoring system and to identify our potential ARTHUR LLOYD customer base." KAY MCCANN DOUG MCGLASHAN Enclosed is SSMC's formal proposal for funding. Also included is an invoice RICKI MCGLASHAN as some cities have requested that we send one in order to streamline the CLEM MOLONY process. JANICE Rossi Executive Director Thank you for your consideration in this request. We look forward to hearing TYLER HAMMER from you. Director of Education J 1 TINA KINGSinger ,, Project Coordinator Indicators Report JOE Rolsf t`yler Hammer Ruth Peterson (� Executive Director Board Chair cc: Rosalie O'Mahony, Mayor SUSTAINABLE SAN MATEO COUNTY is a nonprofit public benefit corporation exempt from federal income tax under IRS Code Section 501(c)(3) Request for Support Sustainable San Mateo County City of Burlingame 177 Bovet Road, 6`'' Floor Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo, CA 94402 San Mateo County, 2009 Report Card Contact: Tyler Hammer, Executive Director Ph: 650-638-2323 Amount Requested: $3,000 Email: advocate@sustainablesanmateo.org Mission Sustainable San Mateo County (SSMC) is dedicated to the long-term health of our county's economy, environment and social equity by educating about sustainability. Living sustainably means that we meet today's needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Organizational Overview SSMC is a non-profit public benefit corporation, staffed primarily by volunteers that make up our committees/board and research our Indicators Report. The Executive Director works closely with an Administrator and the Board Chair to manage the office. SSMC also has two part-time consultants; the Indicators Project Coordinator manages the production of the Indicators Report, and the Education Director provides outreach for the report. SSMC has 5 volunteer committees (Indicators, Management, Events, Communications, and Pathway to Sustainable Cities) that manage their respective areas of business for the organization. Request SSMC is requesting $3,000 from the City of Burlingame in support of its 2009 Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County Report Card. The Indicators Project is SSMC's core program. The annual Report includes approximately 30 indicators of the County's quality of life such as economic trends, unemployment, poverty, land use, transportation, housing affordability, per pupil funding and water quality. The Indicators Report compiles many interdependent issues into a single source for decision-makers and citizens to monitor progress toward sustainability or away from it in any given area. The research, writing, and editing are accomplished with community volunteers of all ages and backgrounds. All donated funds for the Indicator Report will support: 1. The Project Coordinator and the Education Director for the Indicators Report 2. Administrative support associated with the Indicators Report 3. Printing the report 4. Postage to mail the report to community 5. Publicity for the report SSMC is able to keep the cost of production for the Indicators Report very low due to our dedicated group of over 35 volunteers (whose contributions represent an annual value of over $30,000 for an estimated 1,000 hours of work). However, in order to maintain the high quality of the report, SSMC must cover increases in costs; namely, an increase in hours and rate of pay to retain core staff and an increase in the production costs for the report. Benefit to Your City The Indicator report has many benefits for the City of Burlingame: 1. The Indicator Report is the only comprehensive report in San Mateo County that evaluates the health of the county and its cities in terms of sustainability which includes not only the Environment, but also the Economy and social Equity. It illustrates how each issue is linked to others and to sustainability. The report provides a means for city officials to make educated decisions when considering sustainable policies— what gets measure, gets managed. 2. This year more than 5,000 copies of the 2008 report will be distributed throughout the county to governments, chambers, businesses, SAMCAR, libraries and citizens (among others). 3. In the 2008 report, SSMC included a one-page report from the cities in our county detailing their sustainability efforts. We highlighted Burlingame's sustainability successes in areas such as carbon emissions, disaster preparedness, and water efforts. This "best practices" section allows each city to promote its successes and learn from other cities and their successes. These city/county reports will be continued in the 2009 report. 4. The report is a great resource for area businesses and business groups to distribute to their clientele. For example, SSMC recently partnered with SAMCAR to distribute the reports to area realtors and prospective homebuyers to "show off" local sustainability efforts in the county and in each city. The response has been overwhelmingly positive. Sustainable (650)638-2323 • Fax: (650) 341-1395 San Mateo County 177 Bovet Road, Sixth Floor,San Mateo,CA 94402 E-mail:advocate@sustainablesanmateo.org *V4Economy. Equity. Environment. Web:www.sustainablesanmateo.org Dedicated to the long-term health and vitality of our region Founder MARCIA PAGELS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chair INVOICE RUTH PETERSON Vice Chair PATRICK BURT May 8, 2008 Secretary BETH BHATNAGAR City of Burlingame Treasurer 501 Primrose Road THOMAS ROUNDS Burlingame, CA 94010 WARD DANNER GLADWYN D'SOUZA ROSALYN Koo JEANNENE MINNIX COLLEEN MCAVOY Requested Contribution for the Publication of: MARCIA PAGELS Indicators for a Sustainable San Mateo County, 2009 Report Card: $3,000.00 WILLIAM SCHULTE STEPHANI SCOTT SAPNA SINGH ADVISORYCOUNCIL Thank You JILL BOONE JULIA Bon TOM CRONIN EVANGELINE BURGESS RICHARD GORDON Sustainable San Mateo County (SSMC) is a 501(c)(3) California public benefit JERRY HILL corporation. Contributions are tax deductible. SSSMC's federal tax identification ANNE HINCKLE number is 48-1265207. DAVID HINCKLE RO KHANNA ARTHUR LLOYD Please make your check payable to Sustainable San Mateo County and send to: KAY MCCANN Sustainable San Mateo County DOUG MCGLASHAN 177 Bovet Road, 6"Floor RICKI MCGLASHAN San Mateo, CA 94402 CLEM MOLONY JANICE Rossi Executive Director TYLER HAMMER Director of Education TINA KING Project Coordinator Indicators Report JOE Rols SUSTAINABLE SAN MATEO COUNTY is a nonprofit public benefit corporation exempt From Federal income tax under IRS Code Section 501(c)(3) CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY GROUP FUNDING Recommended Awards Community Group FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 Status Mayor Vice-Mayor Cm.Baylock Cm.Nagel Cm.Deal Average Final Award Final Award Final Award Requests O'Mahony Keighran Award CALL Primrose Center $ 4,589 $ 4,801 $ 5,006 $ 7,500 late with explanation $ 7,500 $ 6,000 $ 7,500 $ 6,250 $ 5,500 $ 6,550 Center for Independence ol'Disabled $ 1,251 $ 1,341 $ 1,396 $ - No application received $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Community Gatepath $ 4,172 $ 4,317 $ 4,502 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,400 Human Investment Project $ 1,669 $ 1,789 $ 1,863 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 4,050 $ 2,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,610 Mission Hospice $ 1,669 $ 1,789 $ 1,863 $ 1000 Late with explanation $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 PARCA $ 1,669 $ 1,848 $ 1,944 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,100 $ 2,020 Samaritan House $ 6,674 $ 7,038 $ 7,417 $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 8,000 $ 7,500 $ 8,100 Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County $ 2,086 $ 2,136 $ 2,223 $ 2,500 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,400 $ 2,380 YFA Crisis Intervention Center $ 2,086 $ 2,146 $ 2,187 $ 2,250 $ 2,000 $ 2,250 $ 2,250 $ 2,250 $ 2,250 $ 2,200 Shelter Network $ 4,172 $ 4,655 $ 4,843 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse $ 2,920 $ 3,099 $ 3,180 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 3,300 $ 3,300 $ 3,920 Burlingame Community Theatre $ 2,920 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sustainable San Mateo County $ 1,251 $ 1,551 $ 1,614 $ - No application received $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 $ 1,800 $ 1,360 YMCA Youth Service Bureau(FOCYS) $ 3,337 $ 3,416 $ 3,554 $ - No application received $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Safe Harbor(Winter Shelter) $ 6,674 $ 7,207 $ 7,496 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 8,000 $ 7,600 $ 7,620 Burlingame Historical Society $ 3,000 $ 3,113 $ 3,143 $ 3,200 $ 5,000 $ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 3,560 Ombudsman Program of San Mateo $ 1,000 $ 1,012 $ 1,054 $ 2,00 Available In $ 1,000 $ 1,200 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 1,200 $ 1,380 Peninsula Girls Chorus $ - $ 200 $ - $ FY 08-09 Bud et - I $ - $ - $ - $ - Totals: $ 51,138 $ 51,458 $ 53,283 $ 56,45 $54,000 S 54,000 $ 52,650 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 50,850 $ 53,100 Tabulation Worksheet.xls 6/16/20086:20 PM 4BU®RWUIN4GqijA��MME STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM# 8b MTG. p OA�RATED JUNE�O DATE 06/16/2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED BY Jack Van Etten,Chief of Police DATE: 06/05/2008 APPROVED FROM: Jack Van Etten,Chief of Police BY Jim Nantell,City Manager SUBJECT: Introduce an ordinance amending municipal code 13.36.045 to allow motorcycles o face outward within angled parking spaces by placing either wheel within 6"of the space curb or wheel stop RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council amend Burlingame Municipal Ordinance 13.36.045, adding language that will now allow either the front or rear tire of a motorcycle to touch the curb or bumper stop within an angled street parking space. Tonight,the City Council should introduce the amendment to the existing ordinance by: 1.Requesting that the City Clerk read the title of the amendment to the existing ordinance 2.Waiving further reading of the amended ordinance 3.Introduce the proposed action to amend the existing ordinance 4. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the amendment to the existing ordinance at least 5 days prior to the proposed adoption DISCUSSION: At the present time, section 13.36.045 of Burlingame Municipal Code only allows for the front tire of a motorcycle to be within 6" of a curb or wheel stop within angled street parking spaces to be in compliance with existing law. Through correspondence that was brought to the attention of staff by a concerned citizen, staff discussed the safety issues and reasonableness of allowing motorcycles to park in angled parking spaces facing outward with either the front or rear tire within 6"of the curb or bumper stop. Staff felt that allowing either tire to be within 6"of the curb or bumper stop,would clarify the ordinance and allow a viable option for motorcycle operators to safely exit angled street parking stalls. As a result,staff is recommending that the existing ordinance be amended, adding language that (in addition to the front tire)the rear tire of a motorcycle can be within 6"of the curb or bumper stop when parked within angled street parking. BUDGET IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Copy of the ordinance amending the existing Municipal Code. I ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 13.36.045 TO ALLOW MOTORCYCLES 3 TO BE PARKED IN ANGLE PARKING FACING OUT 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1. The Municipal Code currently provides that any vehicle using an angle parking 8 space has to have the front wheel within six (6)inches of the curb or wheel stop. However,it is 9 usually easier and safer for a motorcyclist to put the rear wheel of a motorcycle to the curb or wheel 10 stop and face the motorcycle out of the space. Motorcycles are an important part of the City's 11 transportation and parking system and should be encouraged as an efficient means of transport. 12 This ordinance would expressly allow motorcyclists to place the rear wheel or the front wheel 13 within six (6)inches of the curb or wheel stop. 14 15 Section 2. Subsection 13.36.045(b)(Angle Parking)is amended to read as follows: 16 (b) On any of the streets or portions of streets established as angle parking zones,when 17 signs or pavement markings are in place indicating such diagonal parking,it shall be unlawful for 18 the operator of any vehicle to park such vehicle except: 19 (1) At the angle to the curb or wheel stop indicated by signs or pavement markings 20 allotting space to parked vehicles and entirely within the limits of such allotted space; 21 (2) With the front wheel nearest the curb or wheel stop within six (6)inches of the curb 22 or wheel stop; however,an operator of a motorcycle who parks a motorcycle with either a front or 23 rear wheel within six(6)inches of the curb or wheel stop shall be considered to be in compliance 24 with this subsection; 25 26 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 27 28 Mayor 1 1 I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the 2 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day 3 of ,2008,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4 _day of ,2008, by the following vote: 5 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 6 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 7 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 8 City Clerk 9 10 U:\FILES\ORDINANC\motorcycleparking.bpd.wpd 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 8c ITEM# MTG. SCO q�AATEU-NE 6 9p0 DATE June 16,2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMI de BY DATE: June 9, 2008 APPA FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: FY 2008-09 Budget Adoption and Gann Limit Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt the two annual budget approval resolutions in the following order: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Adopting Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Burlingame Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2009." "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Establishing 2008-2009 Appropriation Limit for City of Burlingame Pursuant to Article XIII(B) of the California Constitution." BACKGROUND: The City Council held a Budget Study Session on Wednesday,May 28, 2008 to review the Proposed Budget for FY 2008-09. An overview of the proposed budget and capital improvements plan was presented at the study session. Department directors then reported on their individual departments' budgets. The Council added certain expenditures to the proposed budget. The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed budget and capital plan on Monday, June 2, 2008. The FY 2008-09 budget totals that are recommended for adoption are as follow: Proposed Adopted Amendments Budget Budget to the Budget General Fund...................................................... $ 40,881,631 $ 40,955,016 $ 73,385 Water, Sewer, Parking and Waste Enterprise Funds......... $ 24,148,493 $ 24,188,493 $ 40,000 Financing Authority, Shuttle and PEG......................... $ 4,665,584 $ 4,665,584 $ -0- Capital Improvements Fund..................................... $ 17,226,000 $ 17,226,000 $ -0- Total Budget........................................................$ 86,921,708 $ 87,035,093 $ +113,385 The amendments are made for the following reasons: \� 1 .t General Fund Amendments: Street and Storm Drainage Department Error(Double Charge) on Fund Transfer from Parking Fund $61,877 Parks Department Error(Double Charge) on Fund Transfer from Parking Fund $11,508 Total General Fund Amendments: $73,385 Sewer Fund Amendments: Wastewater Treatment Error(Wrong Amount) on Supplies & Services $40,000 Total Water Fund Amendments: $40,000 GRAND TOTAL BUDGET AMENDMENTS: I!-L3,3 8 5 ARTICLE XIII(B)APPROPRIATION LIMIT (GANN LIMIT) Article XIII(B) of the State Constitution limits all state and local government budgets to a formula based upon the 1978-79 budget plus adjustments for cost of living and population changes. In 1990, voters approved modifications to permit use of the percentage change in commercial assessed valuation to increase the limit under certain conditions. In addition,major capital improvements were excluded from the appropriation subject to the limit. Other exceptions are allowed for service charges, Federal grants and mandated programs. The Appropriation Limit pursuant to Article XIII (B)has been calculated and reviewed by the City's audit firm. The City continues to be well below its appropriation limit of$57,689,953. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Adopting Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Burlingame Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2009 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Establishing 2008-2009 Appropriation Limit for City of Burlingame Pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2009 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME that: WHEREAS, the City prepares an annual budget to plan expenditures in light of expected revenues; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the proposed budget from the City Manager, conducted public study sessions on January 26, 2008, February 27, 2008, May 17, 2008, and May 28, 2008, and conducted public hearings on June 2 and June 16, 2008, and the Council has received and considered all testimony and documentation submitted in connection with the budget; and WHEREAS, the proposed budget as submitted and amended makes wise choices in spending and funding among competing programs and services, NOW, THEREFORE, IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The operating and capital improvement budget requirements for the coming year of the City of Burlingame as detailed in the copy of the Budget on file in the Office of the City Clerk are hereby adopted for the City of Burlingame for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. 2. The budget total is $87,035,093 and consists of- General £General Fund of$40,955,016; Water, Sewer, Parking, and Waste Enterprises $24,188,493; Capital Improvement Fund $17,226,000; and Financing Authority, Shuttle Grant, and PEG $ 4,665,584. Mayor 1 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutions were introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2008, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING 2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR CITY OF BURLINGAME PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME that: WHEREAS, in November 1979, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 4, the Gann Appropriation Limit Initiative, which states that beginning July 1, 1980, all state and local government budgets are limited to a formula based upon the 1978-79 budget, plus adjustments for cost of living and population changes, and specific exceptions for service charges, federal and state grants, reserve funds, etc.; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature,adopted Government Code Section 7900, implementing Article XIII B of the California Constitution, and Proposition 111 adopted in June 1990,provides new adjustment formulas; and WHEREAS, in accordance with these State laws,the City of Burlingame has prepared documentation establishing the 2008-2009 appropriation limit, and has made this documentation available to the public in the proposed 2008-2009 budget for more than fifteen(15) days before this resolution was adopted, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED as follows: 1. For 2008-2009, the City of Burlingame's appropriation limit is $57.689,953. 2. The Adopted Budget for 2008-2009 includes $15,653,478 in appropriations that are subject to the limit, and proceeds of taxes of$36,428,220. 3. For 2008-2009, the City of Burlingame is within the limits of Article XIII B of the California Constitution. Mayor 1 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutions were introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2008, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk 2 2008-09 Capital Improvement Program Department of Public .Warks .w3 Agenda * General Fund Projects Gas Tax, Measure A and Grant Funded ProiectS ark in- g Enterer` nds Proje titer & Sewer System Project ouncir General Funds Projects ♦ Storm Drainage $1,236,000 ♦ Handicap ramps $ 100,000 Parks and recreation 255,000 uilding Facilities .59,000 ommunication 0,00 (Po t k. r Storm Drainage ♦ City maintains 42 miles of storm drain valued at $70,000,000 $39,000,000 backlog Recommend $1,236,000 $550,000 Easton Creek outfall line to the bay atch basins, pipelines and oulve.rts.at, rious locations City wide Easton Creek,dredging yd , STORM DRAIN PROJECTS �y 2008"2008 BUDGET YEAR �UIiALL BOM WLOISCMMGE S11iUCNRE �s f9 rm M.w wVROKufNn � PwEi�NE/cn*w e�vNs/x:r Nr,a ��viin�oun.xs smmcn�� iMPX04EMENn /�rrw rr[ pN111 191Y0 � / orw��\•ego �\ •w r eo �w.xn��t. � Handicap I • backlog 4 1,500 • ramps citywide r'.�r�rr�rr� • 41 r�l lTl� = • 3 t 10 CURB RAMPS°p°tire m` �,F `O9 gay `'1trF� °y° A� F� C9M�0 E?J� �F 9Fq� �P 0JP aGpyl tis, 15 CURB RAMPS ap�� Parks . • Recreation Improvements Bayside Park synthetic turf $150,000 Aquatic center boiler 45,000 • • '� 111. 4 � r SAltY .. ,far .�T x } fi r , . 5 v ^ , w E 3 � + ry j'. r ,,, , •. Building Facilities o Recreation Center seismic retrofit $300,000 ® Police station roof $173,000 ♦ Library ADA Improvements $ 40,000: Fire station carpetin. $ 26,000: $ 5,000 15 0.00` Communications (Police Department) ♦ Recommend $50,000 annual Program for next two years ♦ Replace radio equip s- v te, of . Oa .e.�: ,ar idths and frequency`s � t Street Lighting High priority • • • • • • AvenueLalifornia Drive • ' • all Im, r'. c�rnrr� r��l _ �OJ,JUJ pr��r ern eVV C-DfJdUIr E1fld PDIeS -Ifer low \Iujh:lge ;EIVI g- C '? �a err 01 __<ir ttl.riiy.9e.clituw. 5 kVA circuits shown in red. lA1�e msasraccrucmmvGHmar N sw�ancmrs 8 Gas Tax & Measure A Projects City maintains 84 miles of streets valued at.' $60,000,000 ecommend $1,511,000 Street Resurfacing Program Gas tax / Measure A funds $1,050,000; rop 1B funds $ 461,00 L ,4 L'. 2008-09 Street Resurfacing Program Edgehill Drive Palm Drive Occidental Avenue Pepper Avenue Stanley Road Howard Avenue between California Drive and Humboldt. l�I VIA N 3p,111 � � Grant Funded Projects California • • upgrades IIA AB 1546 Grant :. shore Highwaysignal- troller .ay Area Air Qualitm A � ,, BAYSHORE SIGNAL AINTERCONNECT e • CALIFORNIA DRIVE A CONTROLLER UPGRADE oA ■ DONNELLY PARKING LOT c IMPROVEMENTS A .f 10 Parking Enterprise Funds ♦ Reconfiguration of Parking Lot O at North Lane $100,000 - Pedestrian safety - Simplification of traffic movements Water System r 2008-09 Water System Capital Improvements Projects ♦ Burlingame Gate/Grove pipeline $1,155,000__. ♦ Pipeline replacement $1,300,000 Los Robles, Fey, Newhall and California Drives nk improvements $ 800,000° ♦ SFPUC turnouts & SCADA $ 600,00: Wate .. , replacement program $ 170,00 RMW GIS, studies, modeling and $ 475,00 program management Total $4,500,000 2008-09 Water System Capital Improvements Projects Projects Under Construction FY 2GO8-09 Projects section pnoi� E.� J.ct E-Total o v = arm,Gate&Village $1,155,000 © a Robles � v a �Wdies,modeling and GIS 7S,000 ------------- O'OSO ;saipngs uoileilIgui/mojjui ap!mA ';. b0'009'�$ uiseg uoi4ua4ad d1MM OO OSZ uoile4s dwnd ua44iW 000'096'ES auiladid z aseyd anoa!D 1e0/anuQ eiva04!IeD r SIoafoad SjU9WGnoadwj jejideo W@ISAS JGMOS 60-8002 W a SSC a � S ansa S �"s r Projects Under Construction FY 2008-09 Projects section Project Est.Total section Project Est.Total I Ca lifomia Or&Oak Grove Sewer $2,500,000 A California Or&Oak Grove Sewer Rehab $3,040,000 Rehab Phase I Phase 11&Mi.Sewer 2 Mitten Pump Station&Force Main $300,000 B Emergency Retention Basin $3,800,000 Phase I C WWTP Secondary Clarifier Roof $60,000 Total $2,800,000 O Mitten Pump Station&Forte Main Phase II $250,000 E Studies&GIS $350,000 %-I' Total $7,500,000 I saoax.xw we�sokfsbyV Mgrer•mxscywsnparrewr es_nJSYWbq Questions • Answers � 14 AGENDA ITEM NO: 8d BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 16.2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY: DATE: June 9, 2008 APPROVED BY: FROM: William Meeker, Community Development Director— (650) 558-7255 SUBJECT: INTRODUCE ORDINANCE FOR AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, THE SIGN CODE, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE, AMEND MAXIMUM HEIGHTS FOR MONUMENT SIGNS AND TO CORRECT A REFERENCE TO WALL SIGN AREA. INTRODUCTION: City Council should review the proposed ordinance to amend certain provisions of the Sign Code. This is a study item for the City Council. Council should review the proposed changes with staff and suggest any changes, if necessary; and introduce the ordinance. The following Council actions should be taken to introduce the ordinance to amend the sign code regulations: A. Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. If the proposal for the amendments to the Sign Code is clear, this item should be set for a second reading and public hearing at the Council meeting of July 21, 2008. Environmental Review Status: The proposed changes to the sign code are Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states minor alterations to land use limitations are exempt from environmental review. Planning Commission Action: On May 12, 2008, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed changes to the Sign Code at a regular study session. At that meeting, the Commission asked for clarification and made suggestions for modifying the provisions regarding nonconforming pole signs (refer to attached 5/27/08 Planning Commission minutes). These suggestions have been incorporated into the proposed Ordinance. At the Commission meeting on May 27, 2008, the Commission held a public hearing on the proposed changes to the sign code and there were no comments from the public. The Commission voted 6-0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi was absent) to recommend the proposed changes to the Sign Code to the City Council for action. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 22(SIGN CODE). June 16,2008 BACKGROUND: On May 2, 2007,the City Council adopted a comprehensive update to Title 22 of the Municipal Code, the Sign Code. During the review of the proposed update, the owner of property at 1250 Bayshore Highway raised a concern regarding the status of a pole sign which now exists on his property(refer to attached letters from Mark Hudak dated January 12,2007 and April 4,2007,and from Dennis Berkowitz,Max's,dated April 3, 2007). The owner of this property,which includes Max's Opera Cafe and Holiday Inn Express,intends to file a parcel map to split the property into two parcels.The existing pole sign would then be on one of the parcels, but would advertise businesses on both parcels. Under both the previous sign code and the update adopted in 2007, this would no longer be legal because it would be considered off-site advertising for the business that is not on the same parcel as the sign. At the Planning Commission hearing on the Sign Code update, the Commission directed staff to study a possible future amendment to the sign code to address the issue raised regarding the pole sign. The attached ordinance proposes to allow an existing pole sign within the SL(Shoreline),AA(Anna Area)and APN(Anza Point North)zone districts to remain if a property is subdivided into two parcels,and to continue to advertise the businesses on both parcels. However,there are limitations proposed on the use of the sign, similar to the provisions that would apply to a nonconforming sign. In summary,the sign would be allowed to continue to advertise the businesses located on the two parcels only under the following circumstances: 1. No physical alterations of any kind may occur except for replacement of the actual face of the sign and maintenance as permitted under section 22.38.020. 2. Advertising is limited to the advertising of a person,product or service of an occupant of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel and only during the period of actual occupancy by such an occupant. 3. If the sign is removed,it cannot be replaced. 4. No other free-standing signage may be placed on any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel so long as the pole sign remains. 5. All off-premise advertising as prohibited in 22.40.040 on the pole sign shall be removed if any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel are redeveloped by the demolition or construction of any structure or any portion of any structure exceeding one thousand(1,000)square feet or ten percent(10%)of any structure,whichever is greater. Following removal of the off-premise advertising,the only advertising allowed on the pole sign shall be advertising of a person,product,or service located on the one parcel on which the pole sign is then located. 6. The provisions of this section are recorded in a form approved by the city attorney on the title of each of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel. Additional Amendments to the Sign Code: Since the adoption of the comprehensive update to the Sign Code in May of 2007,staff has become aware of a few inconsistencies in the regulation of monument signs in the RR,C-1 and C-2 zone districts,and an inconsistency in a reference for wall sign area in the RR, IB and APS zone districts. It is proposed that in those cases where a parcel frontage exceeds 300 feet in length,an additional monument sign would be allowed,and where the parcel frontage exceeds 400 feet in length,two additional monument signs would be allowed,for a total of three monument signs. It was also discovered that there was an inconsistency in the maximum height allowed for monument signs on certain similar streets. Following is a summary of the proposed changes: C-1 and C-R zone districts: • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Increase the maximum height of monument signs on EI Camino Real from 8 feet to 12 feet. -2- INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 22(SIGN CODE). June 16, 2008 • Add Trousdale Drive to the list of streets in the district (Hospital property is zoned C-1). C-2 Zone District: • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Increase the maximum height of monument signs on Broadway and California Drive from 8 feet to 12 feet. RR (Rollins Road) Zone District • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Reduce the maximum height of monument signs on Adrian Road, Broadway and Rollins Road from 20 feet to 12 feet. • Reduce the maximum height of monument signs on all other streets from 15 feet to 12 feet. RR, IB and APS Zone Districts • Change the reference to the Section which describes the sign area limitations for wall sign area. ATTACHMENTS: • May 27, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes • May 27, 2008 Planning Commission Staff Report • Photos of Monument Signs • May 12, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes • May 7, 2007 and May 21, 2007 Council Minutes • February 26, 2007 and April 9, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes • Letter from Mark Hudak dated April 4, 2007 • Letter from Dennis Berkowitz dated April 3, 2007 • Letter from Mark Hudak dated January 12, 2007 • Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Title 22 (Sign Code) to Exempt Certain Pole Signs in the SL District from Compliance, Amend the Maximum Heights allowed for Monument Signs in the RR, C-1 and C-2 Districts, and Correct Reference for Wall Sign Area SAREPORTSICode AmendmentsOmend Sign Code 200811ntro Amend Sign Code.6.16.08.doc -3- CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Vice-Chair Terrones asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. Jeffrey Kaufman, 1760 Escalante Way, requested that Item 3a (1790 Escalante Way) be removed from Consent Calendar for discussion. 3b. 1226 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED R-3 —APPLICATION FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (1226 EL CAMINO LLC, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND KIRK MILLER AFFILIATES, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN (continued from April 14, 2008 Planning Commission meeting) a. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Condominium Permit, and Parking Variance b. Tentative Condominium Map and Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Combination 3c. 1425 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1 , SUBAREA A — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT TO CHANGE THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (LAURA LEFF, APPLICANT; AND GREGORY J. GORMEY, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN 3d. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22, THE SIGN CODE, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE, AMEND HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR, C-1 AND C-2 DISTRICTS, AND CORRECT A REFERENCE REGARDING WALL SIGN AREA. PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Commissioner Brownrigg moved approval of Items 3b, 3c and 3d on the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports, with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by CommissionerAuran. Vice- Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi absent). VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 3a. 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, PARKING VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A NEW BASEMENT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JOHN C. LEE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVID ZHANG, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (continued from April 28, 2008 and May 12, 2008 Planning Commission meetings) Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. 3 City of Burlingame Item No. Ordinance Amending Title 22,the Sign Code Consent Calendar Meeting Date:5/27/08 Proposal: Amendment to Title 22 of the Municipal Code, the Sign Code to exempt certain pole signs in the SL District from compliance, to amend the maximum heights allowed for monument signs in the RR,C-1 &C-2 Districts,and to correct a reference for wall sign area. Environmental Review Status: The proposed changes to the sign code are Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), per Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states minor alterations to land use limitations are exempt from environmental review. May 12,2008 Planning Commission Study Meeting: At the May 12,2008 Planning Commission Study Meeting for this item, the Commission asked for clarification and made suggestions for modifying the provisions regarding nonconforming pole signs(refer to attached May 12,2008 Planning Commission Minutes). Following is a summary of Commission comments and how they have been addressed. • Clarify purpose of increasing the monument sign height to 12 feet. • Identify examples of 12-foot high monument signs in the Broadway Area. Planning staff would note that the increase to 12 foot high monument signs would not apply to the portion of Broadway within the Broadway Commercial area(zoned C-1),but would apply to that portion of Broadway between California Drive and U.S. 101 (zoned C-2 and RR),where the auto dealers are now located. There are no monument signs in this area now,the businesses in this area have either nonconforming pole signs or use wall signs to advertise their businesses. Attached are two photos of monument signs for reference. The Bay Landing monument sign at 1550 Bayshore Highway is approximately 10'-6"tall, and the Peninsula Hospital four-sided monument sign on the corner of EI Camino Real and Trousdale Drive is 12'tall. The 12-foot high signs are proposed on those streets with higher traffic speeds and/or where parking occurs along the street,in order to provide adequate visibility. • Concern regarding size of addition that would trigger removal of the nonconforming pole sign(issue raised by Mark Hudak from the floor). • Should be allowed to be allowed to be converted to a single-identity, non-conforming pole sign if desired by the property owner. The text of the proposed ordinance has been modified to address the concern raised by Mark Hudak that depending on the size of the parcel involved, a 1000 square foot addition may be minor, and suggested that the trigger requiring removal of the sign be based on an addition which exceeds ten percent of the floor area on the site. In addition,Commissioners noted that if the property which did not contain the sign were redeveloped, the nonconforming sign should be allowed to remain and advertise only the business(es)on the parcel where the sign is located. The ordinance has been amended as follows to address these concerns: "All off-premises advertising as prohibited in 22.40.040 on the pole sign shall be removed if any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel are redeveloped by the demolition or construction of any structure or any portion of any structure exceeding one thousand(1,000)square feet or ten percent(10%)of the floor area—gross square footage of the structures on the parcel,whichever is greater.Following removal of the off-premises advertising,the only advertising allowed on the pole sign shall be advertising of a person, product,or service located on the one parcel on which the pole sign is then located." Ordinance Amending Title 22(Sign Code) May 27, 2008 Background: On May 2, 2007, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update to Title 22 of the Municipal Code, the Sign Code. During the review of the proposed update, the owner of property at 1250 Bayshore Highway raised a concern regarding the status of a pole sign which now exists on his property (refer to attached letters from Mark Hudak dated January 12, 2007 and April 4, 2007, and from Dennis Berkowitz, Max's, dated April 3, 2007). The owner of this property, which includes Max's Opera Cafe and Holiday Inn Express, intends to file a parcel map to split the property into two parcels. The existing pole sign would then be on one of the parcels, but would advertise businesses on both parcels. Under both the previous sign code and the update adopted in 2007, this would no longer be legal because it would be considered off-site advertising for the business that is not on the same parcel as the sign. At the Planning Commission hearing on the sign code update, the Commission directed staff to study a possible future amendment to the sign code to address the issue raised regarding the pole sign. The attached ordinance proposes to allow an existing pole sign within the SL (Shoreline), AA (Anza Area) and APN (Anna Point North) zone districts to remain if a property is subdivided into two parcels, and to continue to advertise the businesses on both parcels. However, there are limitations proposed on the use of the sign, similar to the provisions that would apply to a nonconforming sign. In summary, the sign would be allowed to continue to advertise the businesses located on the two parcels only under the following circumstances: 1. No physical alterations of any kind may occur except for replacement of the actual face of the sign and maintenance as permitted under section 22.38.020. 2. Advertising is limited to the advertising of a person, product or service of an occupant of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel and only during the period of actual occupancy by such an occupant. 3. If the sign is removed, it cannot be replaced. 4. No other free-standing signage may be placed on any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel so long as the pole sign remains. 5. All off-premise advertising as prohibited in 22.40.040 on the pole sign shall be removed if any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel are redeveloped by the demolition or construction of any structure or any portion of any structure exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet or ten percent(10%) of any structure, whichever is greater. Following removal of the off-premise advertising, the only advertising allowed on the pole sign shall be advertising of a person, product, or service located on the one parcel on which the pole sign is then located. 6. The provisions of this section are recorded in a form approved by the city attorney on the title of each of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel. Additional Amendments to the Sign Code: Since the adoption of the comprehensive update to the Sign Code in May of 2007, staff has become aware of a few inconsistencies in the regulation of monument signs in the RR, C-1 and C-2 zone districts, and an inconsistency in a reference for wall sign area in the RR, IB and APS zone districts. It is proposed that in those cases where a parcel frontage exceeds 300 feet in length, an additional monument sign would be allowed, and where the parcel frontage exceeds 400 feet in length, two additional monument signs would be allowed, for a total of three monument signs. It was also discovered that there was an inconsistency in the maximum height allowed for monument signs on certain similar streets. Following is a summary of the proposed changes: -2- Ordinance Amending Title 22(Sign Code) May 27, 2008 C-1 and C-R zone districts: • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Increase the maximum height of monument signs on EI Camino Real from 8 feet to 12 feet. • Add Trousdale Drive to the list of streets in the district (Hospital property is zoned C-1). C-2 Zone District: • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Increase the maximum height of monument signs on Broadway and California Drive from 8 feet to 12 feet. RR (Rollins Road) Zone District • Allow two monument signs on parcels with at least 300 feet of parcel frontage. • Allow three monument signs on parcels with at least 400 feet of parcel frontage. • Reduce the maximum height of monument signs on Adrian Road, Broadway and Rollins Road from 20 feet to 12 feet. • Reduce the maximum height of monument signs on all other streets from 15 feet to 12 feet. RR, IB and APS Zone Districts • Change the reference to the Section which describes the sign area limitations for wall sign area. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing and consider public testimony and the analysis contained in the staff report. Following the public hearing the Commission may consider two alternatives: 1. Recommend the proposed ordinance to the City Council for action; or 2. Direct staff to make adjustments to the ordinance and refer it back to the Commission for reconsideration and action. Maureen Brooks Senior Planner Attachments: Photos of Monument Signs May 12, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes May 7, 2007 and May 21, 2007 Council Minutes February 26, 2007 and April 9, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes Letter from Mark Hudak dated April 4, 2007 Letter from Dennis Berkowitz dated April 3, 2007 Letter from Mark Hudak dated January 12, 2007 Newspaper Notice— Published in San Mateo Times May 17, 2008 Ordinance Amending Title 22 (Sign Code) -3- j � 1 a e x BAY L ANDINg = f y ;.1 )'j�J z .P[ �•'t�l '14r.�` 5 •M J ryti lSSi£n ._ 1550 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY '•iv':t•1N1 ;WMgii.�YS�Tr��� � '�..y�..L n'}t6-'�a�[..:ikFl�i fx .)t. • • • • . 1 • • I • MINES momallolI • Milts-Petli�tsulr fita17' semires AF"OtNee _ Z Mi RMM310 ,,pp PrnLtsata Camprr> `� i 5i sY � :ik�Y EMERGENCY y� 4 7dF` nilr4aJ;t'�p< hpy�t� F dir $ . Main ' - 4 � Entrance wrxy= s .may i g / �...rw� •pll4 ay ld. Y 4. . n�T 4� 'S6y tir+ty y •. � • CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Unapproved Minutes May 12,2008 VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22, THE SIGN CODE, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE,AMEND HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR,C- 1 AND C-2 DISTRICTS,AND CORRECT A REFERENCE REGARDING WALL SIGN AREA. PROJECT PLANNER:MAUREEN BROOKS Senior Planner Brooks presented a summary of the staff report,dated May 12,2008. Commission comments: • Clarify purpose of increasing the monument sign height to 12-feet. • Identify examples of 12-foot high monument signs in the Broadway area. • Concern regarding non-conforming pole sign referenced by Mark Hudak;should be allowed to be converted to a single-identity,non-conforming pole sign if desired by property owner. This item was set for the Consent Calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:14 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the Consent kalendar are considered to b out* They are acted upon simultaneous unless separate discussion an or action is requested by th ppllcant,a member of the public or a Com\RATIOAND rior to the time the Co mission votes on the motion adopt. Chair Cauchi ase in the audience or on the mmission wished to call any m offthe consent calendar. Item llins Road)was removed from t Consent Calendar by Oscar un("Save the Bay'). 2a. 620 FOREST UE, NED R-1—APPLICATION FOR ESIGN REVIEW AND VARI CES R FLOOR AAND RKING FOR A FIRST FLOOR DITION TO A SINGLE FA ILY D ELLING (SZ ASSO TES, APPLICANT AND ARC ECT; AND MARY LOU A DO MORTOTY OWNER PROJECT PLANNER: LISA ITMAN 2b. 9 CHANN G ROAD,ZONED R-1—APPLICA N FOR CONDITIONAL USE PE ITS FOR WINDOWS MORE THA EN FEET ABOVE ADJACENT G E AND FOR STORAGE EXCEE NG TEN PERCENT OF THE GROS FLOOR AREA OF THE MAIN D LLING FORA NEW ACCESS Y STRUCTURE (JERRY KUHEL, PPLICANT AND DESIGNER; D JERRY CARMINE, PROP TY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNE ERICA STROHMEIER CommissionerBrownrig\voice pproval of Items 2a and 2b (the Consent Calendar based on th facts in the staff reports, Comcomments and the findings\in the staff reports, with recommded conditions in the staff rby resolutions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Visfl,a. Chair Cauchi called for \on the motion and it passed 7- . Appeal procedures were advised, This item concluded at 7:18 p.m. 2 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a . PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 22 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE THE SIGN REGULATIONS CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and take action on the proposed ordinance amending provisions of the sign code. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion that Council make the finding that the proposed update to the sign ordinance will have no adverse impact on the environment and adopt the Negative Declaration; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1807 adopting a revised Title 22 (Sign Code); seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. b. ADO ORDINANCE NO. 1808 AFFIRMIN RDINANCE NO. 1800 T SPECIFY THAT ALTERAtIONS TO AN ENTIRE BUILDING AkK TO BE CONSIDERED VMEN CALCULATtXG A REQUIREMENT TO INSTALL PRINKL.ERS RATHER TUAN A SINGLE PREM FC Dorrell reviewed the staff rep and requested Council hold a public caring on the adoption dinance No. 1808 affirming Ordin ce No. 1800 applying administrative ' terpretation for a trigger to ins t 1 sprinklers. Councilwoman Baylo expressed concern that the geograph' al description in Section 2 of the dinance ". . .the Santa Cruz Mounta' s foothills. . ." should be changed to e San Andreas Mountains foothills. A Anderson was not present to con the correct description. Mayor Nagel o ed the public hearing. There were o comments from the floor, and the aring was closed. Vice Mayor O'Mahony de a motion to approve adoption Ordinance No. 1808 affirming Ordi ce No. 1 0 to clarify provision re ding installation of sprinklers, anshould there be a change in Section 2 f Ordi nce No. 1808 as to the ountain boundaries, that it be adde later; seconded by Councilwoman Keighr . The motion was appro d unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. ayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish summary of the ordinan e within 15 days of adoption. Mayor Nagel m ved to Item 13.a. due to public interest. 13. NEW BUSI SS \aSET APPEAL HE NG DATE FOR PE SULA HUMANE SOCIETY/ CA OMPASSION PROD CT AT 1450 ROLLIN ROAD/20 EDWARDS COUR Council s June 4, 2007, as the h ring date for the Plannin Commission appeal of 1450 Rollins Road/ 20 Edwards ourt. 7. PUBLIC OMMENTS 3 Burlingame City Council May 21, 2007 Approved Minutes perni11 is issued for the existing\tb m hedge along the le ide property line o the neighbor's property at 1400 Columbus, anrotection measures shall main in place unti he occupancy permit is issued for the project; ndscaping shall be added a g the right side p erty line adjacent to th house in protects wherever possible and sti maintain a 9'6" c ar driveway width, plant mat als shall be spro 'de screening between the p perties; secondedCouncilwoman Keighran. The s appr ed by voice vote, 4-1 (Bay ck dissented). b. INTRODUCTION OF AND PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 22 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE THE SIGN REGULATIONS Senior Planner Maureen Brooks reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance amending the provisions of the sign code. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Mayor Nagel requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance adopting a revised Title 22 (Sign Code). Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. C. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1806 ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND KING CONFORMING CHANGES T HE MUNICIPAL CODE CA Anderson reviewed the staff report ,d requested Council hold a public hearin n the adoption of Ordinance No. 1806 to establish the comm ity development department. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There e no comments from the floor, and the h ring was closed. Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve adoption Ordinance No. 1806 establishing the Community Development-pepartment and making conforming angel to the Municipal Code; seconde y councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC 14ortensen to publish a sumrnarX of the ordinance within 15 days o doption. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Giorni, 1445 B la bo venue, stated that the t Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee eeting is on Thursday, ay 10, and that Bike to rk Day is Thursday, Ma 17. Stephen Hamilton, 105 Cresc t Avenue, spoke on unteer opportunities. Th ollowing citizens spoke ifavor of saving the Easton Euca tus Tree: Mike 11on, 1719 Easton; Jennife faff, 615 Bayswater A ue; Stephen Hamilton, 105 Cres nt Avenue; and Diane'C-Qndon Wirgler, 1536 Cyp ss. There were no furthe omments from the floor. 8. STAFF ORTS AND COMM CATIONS 3 Burlingame City Council May 7,2007 Approved Minutes City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes April 9, 2007 6. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE TITLE 22, SIGNS, TO ESTABLISH NEW REGULATIONS FOR SIGNS-PROJECT PLANNER:MAUREEN BROOKS(20 NOTICED AND NOTICED IN SAN MATEO COUNTY TIMES) Reference staff report 4/09/07,with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed the proposed sign update and staff comments. Commissioners asked how news rack signage is addressed. Staff noted that there is a separate section of the code which addresses news racks,including what can be displayed on the news rack. Clarify that off premise advertising is currently prohibited by the existing code? Yes. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak,216 Park Road,Wayne Levenfeld,representing property at 1250 Bayshore Highway, and Dennis Zell, 1800 Ashton, spoke. Issues raised: proposed sign code does not address all situations such as an existing pole sign advertising two properties when the property is divided, can no longer advertise both businesses; suggest that language be added that would grandfather such existing signs; sign at 1250 Bayshore was installed in 1960's when original hotel and restaurant were built; be sure revised sign code addresses first amendment protected speech issues. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner comment: concerning issue of shared pole signage being limited to one business if property is divided is a unique situation; would not want to see more clutter by adding more signs, might consider expanding the area where pole signs are allowed to areas adjoining freeway interchanges;there appears to be a consensus that the work done on the sign code update is well done and the current proposal should move ahead; thank the members of the subcommittee for all the hard work they have put into this; should go forward with ordinance and send the issue of this particular situation back for more study,including whether a special area for pole signs should be considered near freeway off ramps. C.Brownrigg moved to recommend approval of the negative declaration and the proposed sign code update to the City Council for action. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0 vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:04 p.m. 7. DETERMINATIO N THE DESIGNATION OF FR T YARD ON CORNS LOTS WHICH CAN AFFECT SETBACKS HE SINGLE FAMILY RES NTIAL AREAS AND LACEMENT OF ACCESSORY STRUCT (28 NOTICED) PROJEC STAFF: LARRY ERSON AND GARET MONROE Reference ff report April 9,2007,with tachments. CA Anderson p sented the staff report, ting two issues to resol : determine if a variance is re uired to place an accessory cture in the front setb k of a property in the areetween the main entrance to e main building and the n est lot line; and direct staff on drafting changes to e Zoning Code to more clea describe regulations reg ing accessory structures. Commission questions: v 'ety of approaches in diffe t cities some allow re a ntrances, some allow evelopers to choose the lot t on corner lots,and on co r lots some cities make t choice on a case by ca basis; for Burlingame on a Omer lot of equal sides the ' itial property owner d ides the primary entra e and front setback,cannot c ge later,on all other lots th ont is the shorter stree ontage. Why are we h e,play structure does not req 're a building permit. CA n d that this structure w bigger and triggered a essory structure requirements, as been reduced;concerne out precedent,not w a garage in the front ya of a corner lot 7 feet from pro rty line,breaking the open ace line for the neighb hood on the street fro age. There were no further que ions of staff from the Co fission. 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 26, 2007 12. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE TITLE 22, SIGNS, TO ESTABLISH NEW REGULATIONS FOR SIGNS-PROJECT PLANNER:MAUREEN BROOKS(NOTICED IN SAN MATEO COUNTY TIMES) SP Brooks briefly presented the project description,noting that the subcommittee had been working on the sign code update for two years now,had studied the existing sign environment and made recommendations on what works and what does not work. Subcommittee came up with the new regulations based on a new approach which determines the overall square footage of signs allowed based on the speed of travel of the street or public way on which the signs are located. Commissioners commented on the letter from Mark Hudak regarding the existing pole sign shared by Holiday Inn Express and Max's Opera Cafe, and asked if there is a way that this signage could be"grandfathered"under the new code. Planning staff clarified that the pole sign itself is now nonconforming and can continue to be used. However,the off-premise advertising issue would be created by the property when the property is divided and the existing two businesses are no longer on one parcel. This is not a nonconforming situation,but a new situation which would be created by the property owner's action subdividing the property. Commissioners expressed concern with the proposed regulation which would prohibit awnings from being internally lit,think it is too restrictive,is there a way to regulate so that the internal lights can illuminate only the portions of the awning where the letters are located and no more, and the rest of the awning remains dark. Planning staff noted that it is difficult to regulate the intensity of illumination,will look into various methods used for awning lighting and report back; note that there is a limit on the overall area of signage allowed on a site,is this the approach that was used for Fox Plaza;yes,the same approach is proposed in the sign code update,where with a variance, signage can be moved from one frontage to another and the number of signs can be increased,but there is a cap on the overall or total square footage allowed. Commissioners noted that there is an incentive for two sided monument signs, each counted as a one sided sign when determining is counted toward overall sign area,can we require that the copy on both sides be the same? Planning Staff noted monument signs are treated separately from other signage(wall,projecting and awning signs)and only one side of a monument sign is counted. CA Anderson noted that because the courts have restricted regulation on content,could not require copy to be the same on both sides. Commissioners asked about the use of artwork as signs,how would the new regulations restrict, do not want to discourage that kind of creativity. Planning staff noted that some artwork is not regulated by the sign code,if it does not specifically identify a business;if the art is determined to be a sign,it would be regulated in the same way it is now,by its size and location on the site,roof signs would continue to be prohibited,but a projecting sign could be designed creatively. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. Chair Brownrigg noted that this item will be brought back to the Commission on the action calendar when the additional information is provided. The public hearing will be noticed in a newspaper of general circulation, notices will be mailed to people who have expressed interest in the sign code update and the information will also be posted on the City's website. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m. X. COMM SSIONER'SPORTS - There ere no Co ssioner's Rep s for review. 16 ATTACHMENT A-3 CARR McCLELLAN INGERSOLL THOMPSON & HORN Professional Law Corporation Mark D.Hudak mhudak@carr-mcciellan.com L April 4, 2007 COALUUNICATIONRECEIVW AFTER PREPARATIOM OF STAFF REPORT Planning Commission City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Amendments to Sign Ordinance Dear Commissioners: In recent weeks,the City Council and staff have made public promises about making Burlingame more"business-friendly." There seems to be a growing recognition of the level of financial contribution made by the business community through sales taxes and transit occupancy taxes and an acknowledgement that these taxes makes it possible for the City to offer its residents many of the facilities and services that make Burlingame special. But the City needs to offer more than a slogan and a promise. Too often, a new business venture is met with a litany of reasons why something will not work. If this is a serious change in approach, the City needs to have the attitude that it will work with business owners to find a way to make their ventures succeed. The Commission has a good opportunity to put the"business-friendly"policy into action on April 9. As you will see from my prior letter to Larry Anderson, I have been working with the owners of the property that includes the Holiday Inn Express and Max's Restaurant on Old Bayshore Highway. The ownership group wants to remove the pool that is situated in front of the hotel and replace it with parking and landscaping. This will benefit both businesses and will upgrade the appearance of the property. To finance these improvements,the owners will probably need to split the lot into two conforming lots. The only holdup is signage. For years, the businesses have utilized a single sign that is visible from the freeway. If the property is split, one lot will end up having the sign. Technically,the business located on the other lot would not be able to use the sign any longer. That would be fatal for whichever business lost its signage, and so we have not been able to proceed with the pro)ect. P 650.342.9600 216 Park Road • Burlingame • California 94010 F 650.342.7685 www.carr-mociellan.com Planning Commission April 4, 2007 Page 2 To correct this anomaly,we have proposed a simple grandfathering clause as part of the overall revisions to the sign ordinance. This provision would preserve existing signage when a property is split, so that both properties could continue to use it. It would not authorize any new signage, nor would advertising for businesses located on other properties be permitted. From the public's standpoint,this provision would do no harm: the provision would apply to very few properties and it would be difficult for anyone to tell when it had been applied. From the business community's standpoint,this small change would have significant benefits. What, then, is the objection? I hope that you will review my earlier letter in this context. I am also enclosing a letter from the owner of Max's Restaurant regarding the importance this proposed addition to the new sign ordinance. I will be appearing at the meeting on April 9 to discuss this with you. In the meantime,please call me with any questions. Sincere Mark D. Hudak MDH:os Enclosure cc: Client(w/encl.) City Manager(w/encl.) City Attorney(w/encl.) City Planner(w/encl.) 26944.00001\BGLIB 1\1326749.1 04-04-OT II:ITu From-Mix's kcountinz 6606736462 T-201 P.DOVDD3 F-466 MAX'S OPERA CAW'-•MAX'S DiNER""•MAX'$""•SWEET MAX'S—•MAX'S MARKET" MAX'S BAKERY&KITCHEN-•MAX'S DIAMOND GRILLS^' /ysm April 3,2007 Clmicpason and Commission Planning Commission Crty of Bteiia�ume ' Re: Sign Ordinance Changes Oentleman 1 am the president of Max's ReaUwnds which owns and operates Max's Restemant and Bar at 1250 Old Bayshorc Highway,Burlingame,edjaceut to the Holiday bon Express hotel. Our.per nt has been a popular dieting and tiering spot in that location for over 20 years. We pride ourselves for involvement with and service to the local oornmunity hod we look forward to continuing that relationship for a long time into the fimue- We have just recently completed a 5400,000 ra vation o£our restaurant as a symbol ofour continuing corny Un=t to the community. it is our understanding that our landlord,which is also the owner of the adjacent hotel,is working on a plan to subdivide its current land parcel into two parcels,including ow for the hotel and one for the restaurant. We further understand thus the subdivision is an essential part of•plan thatwill greatly benefit our business. One problam ter bush= has atways faced at this location is that when both the hotel and the restaut=aero busy convenient parking is a challenge for our guests. Even when tie hotel lot is virtually empty the lack of parking in the front arra nearest the restaurant entry forces our guests to park far away(generally behind the hotel)and to walk to the mstauuaru entry. This can have an adverse impact on our business with both guests for whom a long walk is difftcttlt and for all guest on days when the weather is nasty, TU landlord's plan would eliminate the swimming pool at the front of the howl,which is almost never used and detects from the look and statute of both the hotel and the restaurant by making the complex look like an old roadside motel. 7'he pool area would then be redeveloped into parking spaces with a total increase of 32—35 spaces.Landscaping in the Brent area of both lots would also be expanded and enhanced which we understand is cousistem with the City's goals_From Max's standpoint these now spaces would be extremely valuable singe they would alk-Age the occasional parking shortme issue and would more than double be number of spaces near rho front door entry to our restaurant it is our understanding the the landlord's plea may not be able proceed as a result of current code regulations for property Identification signs. Our restaurant business and the 120 Fast Grand Avo.,South San Francisco,CA 940DO TEU 650.873.MAXS(6297) FAX:650.873.6461 D4-DP07 II:I Tan From-Max'; Accounting 6608736462 T-20i P.D03/001 F-168 hotel currently share a largo strucMo that contains scpeMc'signs for to howl and for Msz's. We are told that if the land is subdivided a problem will atiec since the ordinance does not allow a sign on one parry's land to serve as the property identification sign for an adjacent parcel. Further,if Max's or the hotel went to bond a r3ew sign on its own lend pamcl the sign would need to be Considerably smaller. This would not be acceptable for citber the hotel or the restsu ant since a smaller sign would clearly have a negative impeet on whichever business was forced to have it. Unless this problem is solved the subdivision will not occur and r,eitber will the important perking and landscaping additions, and removal the unattractive pool it is our understanding that the commission is considering changes to the ordinance. We mage that you approve a change that will allow for acisting sjg that curready service more than one:business to remain m plaoe in a grandWhered status whetlrer the businesses are all on the same parcel or are on adjacent parcels. This change would allow our laodlord's very benelicial project to proceed, we see abw1uttly no way in which the city of Burlingame or any of its reside=and guests would suffer any negative impact from this,but,as discussed above,our bushiest,out tears,and community members driving past the sits and seeing the additional landscaping and irnpruvod look,would all benefit. Tu fact,since our restaurant iru9aess would likely increase due to the improved look and parking availability,the city would 15mly earn additional revenue due to intm�sed sales levels rQ the restaurant I thank you for your consideration of this issue that is of great importance to Max's. Pleaso do not hesitate to call me directly if you have any questions or need additional informarioa. Sincerely 's World r Dennis Bc&owitz President i- CARR McCLELLAN INGERSOLL THOMPSON & HORN Professional Law Corporation Mark D. Hudak mhudak@carr-modellan.com January 12, 2007 RECEIVED Larry Anderson, Esq. JAN 12 2007 City Attorney CITY OF BURLINGAME City of Burlingame PLANNING DEPT. 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Sign Ordinance Revisions Dear Larry: I understand that a committee of the Planning.Commission is studying amendments to the sign ordinance. One area of concern for my clients is the treatment of existing signs that serve two or more businesses when the property is subdivided. Under the current ordinance, a sign may advertise only the businesses that are located on the same property as the sign itself. Advertising off-site businesses is not permitted. There are several instances where existing signage advertises.two or more businesses that are located on a single large property. If the property is subdivided or undergoes a lot line adjustment, the sign will inevitably end up on one parcel and will be in violation of the ordinance if it continues to display advertising for the business located on the split-off parcel. One particular instance involves the signage for Max's Opera Cafe:and the Holiday Inn Express on Old Bayshore Highway. The property owner wants to make some improvements to the property(primarily, to increase parking). To do so, he proposes to split the existing large parcel into two parcels that could be sold or financed separately. One parcel will have Max's and the other will have the hotel. Both parcels would be conforming under the new Bayfront Specific Plan: No matter how this lot split is accomplished,the sign will end up on one parcel and the business located on the other parcel will forfeit its signage. This sign is critical to both businesses,given its visibility from Highway 101. Unless there is some relief,we cannot move forward with the lot split and improvements that would benefit both businesses and their customers. In short, the proverbial tail is wagging the dog. P 650.342.9600 216 Park Road Burlingame • California 94010 F 650.342.7685 www.carr-mcclellan.com Z Larry Anderson, Esq. January 12, 2007 Page 2 We could avoid this dilemma by creating an exemption for existing signage in the new ordinance. I would ask that the committee consider the following approach: "Nothwithstanding any other provision herein, a sign that advertises two or more businesses located on a single property may be maintained following a subdivision, lot split, lot line adjustment; or other division of the property. In such situations, the sign may continue to advertise businesses that are located on the parcel or parcels that were part of the property served by the sign prior Yo the property division,including any successor or new businesses located thereon. Such signs may be maintained,repaired, and replaced but may not be increased in size or height beyond the dimensions in existence prior to the property division." This exception would apply in only a limited number of cases throughout tfie city, so its impact on the public health, safety and welfare would be minimal. On the other hand, the flexibility would be an enormous benefit to the properties and businesses affected. The exception could not be used to create new,nonconforming signs; only existing signs would be affected. Please let me know if you have any questions about our position. I would be happy to meet with the committee if that would be helpful. I would ask that you pass on this letter to them for their consideration and let me know when the amended ordinance will be brought forward to the Planning Commission for study. Since Mark D. Hudak MDH:os cc: Clients 04050.00001\BGLIB M 317556.1 Public Notice Print Page 1 of 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010-3997 (650) 558-7250 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING THE CITY OF BURLIN-GAME PLANNING COMMISSION WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE, AMEND HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR, C-1 AND C-2 DISTRICTS, AND CORRECT A REFERENCE REGARDING WALL SIGN AREA. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2008 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA. THE STAFF REPORT FOR THIS ITEM AND DRAFT OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SIGN CODE MAY BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD, BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL (650) 558-7250. IF YOU CHALLENGE THE SUBJECT AMENDMENT TO SIGN REGULATIONS IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY AT OR PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. SAN MATEO COUNTY TIMES Appeared in: Bay Area News Group on Saturday, 05/17/2008 Nurn,in, MyPeihlic'Yorict-sx0 it http://www.mypublienotices.com/PublicNotice/Popups/PrintNotice.asp?PrintNoticeList=973677 5/19/2008 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 22 (SIGN CODE)TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE 3 SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE,AMEND THE MAXIMUM HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR, C-1,AND C STRICTS,AND 4 CORRECT REFERENCE FOR WALL SIGN AREA 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 Section 1. 7 In 2007, the City adopted a comprehensive revision of the City's Sign Code(Title 22). 8 Since adoption, the City has identified some inconsistencies in the regulation of monument signs 9 in the RR, C-1, and C-2 Districts. This ordinance addresses those inconsistencies. The 10 ordinance also corrects references for wall sign area in the RR, 113, and APS Districts. In 11 addition,property owners with existing pole signs in the SL District are faced with irregular lot 12 lines and patterns of development that often require lot line adjustments or splits in order to 13 properly develop or finance the properties. This ordinance would allow off-site advertising of 14 the adjacent businesses on an existing pole sign following such a lot line adjustment or split,but 15 only under very specific circumstances and conditions. 16 17 Section 2. Subsection 22.14.050(a) (C-1 &C-R Districts)is amended to read as follows: 18 (a) , One 19 two-sided freestanding monument sign shall be permitted on a parcel frontage of one hundred 20 (1.00) feet or greater-, based on the following criteria and subject to the standards in chapter 21 22.34. Two two-sided freestanding monument signs shall be permitted.on a parcel frontage of at 22 least three hundred (300) feet based on the following criteria and subject to the standards in 23 chapter 22.34. and Tthree(3) two-sided freestanding monument signs shall be permitted on a 24 parcel frontage of four hundred (400) feet or greater based on the following criteria and subject to 25 the standards in chapter 22.34.:- 26 2.34.-26 27 H 28 May 13, 2008 Draft 1 1 Street on which Maximum Maximum Sign Area per Monument Sign forr 2 Parcel Frontage Height Parcel Frontage is Located 3Ei - R- 8 feed100 square feet pe 260 square feet total sign side are4 Broadway 8 feet 50 square feet per side 100 square feet total sign 5 area 6 California Drive 12 feet 100 square feet per 200 square feet total sign side area 7 Ll Camino Real 12 feet 100 square feet per 200 square feet total sign 8 side area 9 Howard Avenue 8 feet 50 square feet per side 100 square feet total sign area 10 Rollins Road 8 feet 50 square feet per side 100 square feet total sign area 11 Trousdale Drive 12 feet 100 square feet per 200 square feet total sign 12 side area 13 All Other Streets 5 feet 30 square feet per side 60 square feet total sign (local) area 14 15 Section 3. Subsection 22.16.050(a) (C-2 District) is amended to read as follows: 16 (a) Monument Signs: 17 (1) One two-sided freestanding monument sign shall be permitted on a parcel frontage of 18 at least one hundred-fifty(15 0) feet based on the following criteria and subject to the standards in 19 chapter 22.34. Two two-sided freestanding monument signs shall be permitted on a parcel 20 frontage of at least three hundred (300) feet based on the following criteria and subject to the 21 standards in chapter 22.34. Three(3) two-sided freestanding monument signs shall be permitted 22 on a parcel frontage of four hundred (400) feet or greater based on the following criteria and 23 subject to the standards in chapter 22.34. 24 25 Street on which Maximum Maximum Sign Area for a Parcel Frontage Height Monument Sign 26 is Located 27 Broadway 12$feet 50 square feet 100 square feet per side total area 28 May 13, 2008 Draft 2 1 California Drive 12$feet 50 square feet 100 square feet 2 per side total area 3 Rollins Road 8 feet 50 square feet 100 square feet per side total area 4 All other Streets 5 feet 30 square feet 60 square feet 5 (local) per side total area 6 7 (2) Monument Sign Incentive: In order to promote monument signs in this district, 8 two-sided monument signs are considered to be a single sign and in measuring total sign area, 9 only one side of the sign is included in the calculation. 10 (3) Freestanding monument signs are prohibited on a parcel frontage of less than one 11 hundred-fifty(15 0) feet in length. 12 13 Section 4. Section 22.20.020 (SL, AA &APN Districts) is amended to read as follows: 14 22.20.020 Prohibited signs, including pole signs. 15 (a) In addition to the signs specified in chapter 22.40, Prohibited Signs,pole signs are 16 prohibited. 17 (b) However, a pole sign lawfully existing on March 31, 2008, may continue to exist so 18 long as it conforms to the provisions of chapter 22.38. Further, notwithstanding section 19 22.40.040, if the parcel on which a pole sign lawfully existing on March 31, 2008, is located is 20 subdivided in accordance with title 26 of this code, the advertising on the existing pole sign may 21 advertise the businesses that are located on the resulting parcels but only under the following 22 circumstances: 23 (1) No physical alterations of any kind may occur except for replacement of the actual 24 face of the sign and maintenance as permitted under section 22.38.020. 25 (2) Advertising is limited to the advertising of a person, product or service of an occupant 26 of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel and only during the period of 27 actual occupancy by such an occupant. 28 (3) If the sign is removed, it cannot be replaced. May 13, 2008 Draft 3 1 (4} No other free-standing signage may be placed on any of the parcels created by the 2 subdivision of the original parcel so long as the pole sign remains. 3 (5) All off-premises advertising as prohibited in 22.40.040 on the pole sign shall be 4 removed if any of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel are redeveloped by 5 the demolition or construction of any stricture or any portion of any structure exceeding one 6 thousand (1,000) square feet or ten percent(10°u) of the floor area—gross square footage of the 7 structures on the parcel, whichever is greater. Following removal of the oft-premises advertising, 8 the only advertising allowed on the pole sign shall be advertising of a person, product, or service 9 located on the one parcel on which the pole sign is then located. 10 (6) The provisions of this section are recorded in a form approved by the city attorney on 11 the title of each of the parcels created by the subdivision of the original parcel. 12 13 Section 5. Subsection 22.22.040(a) (RR District) is amended to read as follows: 14 (a) In addition to the total sign area allowed under section 22.22.030, one two-sided 15 freestanding monument sign shall be permitted on each parcel frontage of at least one 16 hundred-fifty(15 0) feet in length based on the following criteria and subject to the standards in 17 chapter 22.34.- Two two-sided freestanding monument signs shall.be permitted on a parcel 18 frontage of at least three hundred (300) feet based on the following criteria and subject to the 19 standards in chapter 22.34. Three (3) two-sided fi;cestanding monument signs shall be permitted 20 on a parcel frontage of four hundred (400) feet or greater based on the following criteria and 21 subject to the standards in chapter 22.34. 22 Street on which Height Maximum Sign Area of Monument Sign 23 Parcel Frontage is Located 24 Adrian Road 12 20 feet 75 square feet per side 150 square feet of total sign area 25 Broadway 12 20 feet 75 square feet per side 150 square feet of total 26 sign area 27 Rollins Road 12 2.0 feet 75 square feet per side 150 square feet of total sign area 28 May 13, 2008 Draft 4 1 All other streets 12 -1-5 feet 40 square feet per side 80 square feet of total 2 (local) sign area 3 4 Section 6. Subsection 22.22.050(a) (RR District) is amended to read as follows: 5 (a)Wall signs shall be permitted on any designated frontage subject to the sign area 6 limitations listed in Section 22.2 2.020 22.22.030 and the placement requirements listed in 7 Chapter 22.48. 8 9 Section 7. Subsection 22.24.050(a) (IB &APS District) is amended to read as follows: 10 (a) Wall signs shall be permitted on any designated frontage subject to the sign area 11 limitations listed in Section 22.2�R 22.24.030 and the placement requirements listed in 12 Chapter 22.48. 13 14 Section 8. This ordinance shall be published as required by State law. 15 16 Mayor 17 18 I, DORIS MORTENSEN' City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 19 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council held on the day of 20 , 2008, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21 day of , 2008, by the following vote: 22 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 23 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 24 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 25 26 City Clerk 27 28 U:\FILES\ORDINANC\SignCoderevision2008-2ndDraft.wpd May 13, 2008 Draft 5 CITY C BURUNGAME STAFF REPORT AGENDA 8e 9D ITEM# ORATED JUNE� MTG. DATE June 16,2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED,? DATE: June 10, 2008 BY FROM: Ana Silva APPROVED r ' fi�+r! Tel.No.: 558-7204 By _y�;"� ��lilt G/� SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD OTRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION: Make appointment to fill two expired terms or take other action. BACKGROUND: Two Board positions are due for appointment because of term expiration. The positions were publicized and notification letters were sent to past commission and board applicants. Eight applications were received (one withdrawal) as of the deadline of May 30, 2008. The following seven applicants were interviewed by the full Council on June 10, 2008 — R. Sanborn Towle; Deborah Griffith; Elizabeth Corcoran; Jennifer Buckley; Patty Apostol Rally; Alvin Begun; and Michael Kimball. The appointee term will be for three years, ending in June 2011. CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 9a MTG. a00q .. 900 AOR-JUNE 6 DATE June 16,2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMI T BY DATE: June 9,2008 A ROVED FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: PENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER MEDIATION SERVICES CONTRACT FOR FY 2008-09 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a funding agreement with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center(PCRC) for fiscal year 2008-09 in the amount of$16,182 and authorize the City Manager to execute documents. BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame contracts with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center to provide mediation and conciliation services to residents, landlords, tenants,businesses and other persons needing these services. The services include: • Information and referral services. • One-party assistance in conflict situations. • Conciliation services as a neutral third party. • Mediation services to resolve conflicts between two parties. • Recruitment and training of community volunteers. A complete listing of all services is included in the attached funding agreement document. The FY 08-09 budget contains $16,182 for this purpose. This is the same amount as in FY 07-08. The request from the agency is $16,829. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Authorizing The City Manager to Execute Agreement with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center to Provide Conciliation and Mediation Service in FY 2008-2009 Agreement for the Provision of Community Mediation Services - FY2008-09 S:\Funding Agreements with Agencies\Peninsula Conflict and Resolution Center\FY 08-09 Agreement-Agenda Report.doc PevAIV1SLAIa COVA fli& Re_SO1 ntiOVA Cev�tev` G� Cm owerin people. Btiildih relatiov%shi s. ReJL4cih violence, I' 9 C !' 9 f' 9 April 11, 2008 James Nantell, City Manager City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Jim, We know that this year may be economically challenging for local governments, schools, businesses, individuals and families. That reality only increases the need for collaborative efforts to strengthen communities. PCRC's services alleviate the costs of lawsuits, police responses, and unnecessary calls for city services such as code enforcement and planning. Your partnership with PCRC relieves the burden on your own resources in reducing violence, resolving community problems and meeting your city's varied needs for effective communication. To continue to provide those services to all of our residents and businesses, PCRC needs the financial support of every city in San Mateo County. A 2008-2009 proposed contract for your city is enclosed. Joining us as a contracting partner demonstrates your commitment to the safety of your community. PCRC has been implementing an extensive community outreach plan over the past year to ensure that people know about mediation, facilitation and training as available resources. In so doing,we promote our partnership with your city, so your residents know that you are committed to meeting their needs in this important way. While we understand that it may be difficult for you to allocate precious resources to PCRC's services, our contract is more essential than ever. With this in mind,we are inviting you to consider $16,829 as the FY 2008-09 contract amount for the City of Burlingame. I also invite you to also review two additional documents enclosed: "Add-on Training Packages" and "How PCRC Works with Cities". These outline some of the expanded ways PCRC can supplement city efforts to reduce violence and build community. PCRC is committed to our invaluable partnership with cities in San Mateo County. We appreciate your on-going support for our shared goals. I would welcome the opportunity to collaborate with you personally in customizing a program to address your own needs as a manager, employer, facilitator and civic leader who faces significant challenges and conflict in your role every day. Sin Jennie ock �nte xecutive Director P.S. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions about the contract enclosed. 1660 S. Ampkleft Blvd.,#2-19•Sar.Mateo,CA 94402•650-513-0330•Fac 650-513-0335'www.percweb.org A nonpro fit cornw%wAify resotnrce serving San Mateo County since 1986 Pe-nivlsLtIa Gov f lict Reso tAficm GevAfeN G� Empowering people. Building relationships. RedLAcing violence. Agreement for the Provision of Community Mediation Services The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC), a 501(c)(3)public benefit corporation,wishes to provide conflict resolution services for the City of Burlingame (City). The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center is an independent contractor, organized in accordance with the laws of California and is capable of performing the conflict resolution services described in this agreement. PCRC and Burlingame agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. The PCRC shall provide the services described in Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this agreement. 2. FUNDING. Funding by the City shall be in advance and shall not exceed$16,829. PCRC shall provide documentation to specify how the funds requested shall be spent, including such details as the City deems appropriate.Additional documentation may be requested by the City. 3. CONTRACT TERM. This contract shall commence on July 1, 2008 and shall terminate on June 30, 2009 unless terminated before that time, as described in Paragraph 6 of this agreement. 4. PROGRAM REPORTS. A performance report shall be submitted to the City on a quarterly basis. This report shall include a description of all program activity related to this contract for the particular quarter. 5. BREACH OF CONTRACT. The City reserves the right to waive any and all breaches of this contract, any such waiver shall not be deemed a waiver of all previous or subsequent breaches. In the event the City chooses to waive a particular breach of this contract, it may condition said waiver on payment by PCRC of actual damages occasioned by such breach of contract. PCRC shall make every effort to resolve the breach quickly and amicably. 6. TERMINATION. In the event the PCRC is unable to fulfill its responsibilities under this contract for any reason whatsoever,including circumstances beyond its control, the City may terminate this contract. Either party to this agreement may terminate this contract without cause by giving 10 days written notice to the other party. 7. INTEREST OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS. No members, officer or employee or agents of the City,no member of the City Council, and no other public official exercising any function or responsibility with respect to this program during his/her tenure, shall have any interest, direct or indirect,in this contract or a related subcontract or the proceeds thereof. 8. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. It is expressly understood that PCRC is an independent contractor and that no agency, employee or other relationship is intended to be or is established by this contract. 9. INSPECTION OF PROGRAM. It is understood that periodic review of PCRC's program may be necessary and the right to do so is reserved by the City. 10. ASSIGNABILITY. PCRC shall not assign in this agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same,without the prior written consent of the City. 11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INSURANCE. PCRC agrees (1)to hold harmless and indemnify the City and its officers and employees from and against any and all claims, loss,liability, damage and expense arising from performance of this contract,including claims, loss,liability, damage and expense caused or claimed to be caused by passive negligence of the City or its officers or employees. (2)to defend(City),its officers or employees there-against;provided however that this provision does not apply to claims, loss,liability, damage or expense arising from(a)the sole negligence or willful misconduct of(City)or(b)the active negligence of(City). General liability and automobile liability insurance shall provide the following minimum benefits: (1) general liability,including comprehensive form,personal injury, broad form property damage, contractual and premises/operation in limits of $1,000,000. aggregate,bodily injury and property damage combined; (2) automobile liability in limits of$1,000,000,bodily injury and property damage combined. Additionally, workers compensation insurance in at least the minimum statutory amounts shall be maintained. All liability insurance policies shall specify(City),its elective and appointed boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees as additional insureds. A certificate of insurance shall be provided to (City)prior to performance pursuant to this contract. It shall include policy endorsement verifying City's additional insured status. Further, any changes in insurance,required herein must be approved in writing by the City Attorney's Office. 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. General: No person shall, on the basis of race, color,national origin,religious affiliation or non affiliation;marital status,medical condition, sex, age,handicap, sexual orientation or political affiliation be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits or be subjected to discrimination,under this agreement. Employment: PCRC shall ensure equal employment opportunity based on objective standards of recruitment, selection,promotion, classification, compensation, performance evaluation and management relations,for all employees under this agreement. PCRC's personnel policies shall be made available to the City upon request. 13. PROJECT REPRESENTATION. PCRC and the City hereby designate the following agents to act as project representatives and receive all notices in the matters dealing with the performance of work,under this agreement. PCRC: Jennifer Bullock,Interim Executive Director CITY: James Nantell, City Manager 14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event that differences relating to this contract,or to the relationship between the contracting parties, should arise during the term of this agreement,both parties will pursue resolution using an interest-based,non-adversarial 9 approach and utilizing the services of a neutral third party mediator if direct negotiations are not successful. 15. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS. Additional provisions,if any,are contained in Exhibit A,attached to this document. In witness thereof,this agreement has been duly executed by the parties named above. PENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER 1660 South Amphlett Blvd,Ste.219 San Mateo,CA 94402 (650)513-0 By Date Jennier B 1 terim Executive Director CITY OF Burlingame James Nantell,City Manager 501 Primrose Road Burlin e,CA 9 10 By Date ±o �� EXHIBIT "A" I. What PCRC will provide Services to be provided to the City of Burlingame through this contract are described below. A. Information Services All of the services in this category are unlimited and free of charge. 1) Information and Referral: A resource person is available by telephone, to assist residents who have specific questions relating to a conflict. Through this conversation the resident may clarify issues of concern, be given specific information about common practices related to landlord-tenant and community issues and receive a referral to an appropriate agency/resource. 2) Information and Assistance: A resource person assists the concerned caller to de- escalate feelings, clarify issues and underlying needs, develop possible solution options, and begin to design an approach to dispute resolution. 3) Promotion of Use of Conflict Resolution Services: PCRC staff and volunteers will make presentations and develop press releases and media coverage. PCRC will provide brochures and other printed materials to be kept in public areas where community members are likely to seek resource information. During the 08-09 fiscal year, PCRC will implement an extensive community outreach plan including presentations to city staff and community and business groups. B. Mediation Services for Individuals 1) One Party Assistance: A resource person assists a caller to think through a conflict situation, including clarifying issues and interests of involved parties, exploring approaches to dealing with the situation and solution options and assisting with the selection of an approach to resolution. 2) Conciliation: Conciliation is the resolution of a conflict through the intervention of a neutral third party, without the disputing parties coming together in a face-to-face mediation. A mediator works with an individual, clarifying issues of concern, explaining approaches to seeking resolution, and gaining agreement by the party to pursue mediation and case intake. A case development process, involving contacts with both/all involved parties, is initiated and during that process, a resolution of concerns is achieved, to the satisfaction of the involved parties. 3) Mediation: Mediation through PCRC involves a face-to-face meeting between disputing parties who contact PCRC directly or who are referred by city staff or community agencies. With the assistance of a panel of trained volunteer mediators, parties work through a non-adversarial problem solving process and attempt to develop a mutually acceptable resolution to the issues of concern. There is a two- fold focus: development of a satisfying and durable agreement and the preservation of an effective relationship in situations where the parties will continue to be in contact with each other. 4 Through this contract,the City is subsidizing the provision of private mediation services to those who reside or work in the City.These services assist with conflict situations between individuals.The types of conflicts may include:landlord/tenant disputes,issues between two neighbors (either owners or renters), consumer disputes, roommate problems, conflicts between friends,plus some domestic or family issues. PCRC also provides mediation services in more complex situations that involve multiple parties and/or multiple issues. For example:workplace disputes;intra-or extra- organizational conflicts,multi-neighbor disputes or public controversies.See C. Additional Conflict Resolution Services. C. Additional Conflict Resolution Services If the City,residents or local organizations use the services described below,this contract provides a 107o discount off of PCRC's standard fee schedule (upon request). 1) Training:PCRC offers orientations to city staff about the mediation program and its services as part of the basic contract. In addition,PCRC can train groups.in theory and practice of interest-based conflict management,negotiation, communication, and facilitation skills.Training session are tailored to the particular needs of the group and have proven useful to city departments heads, front-line staff, commission members,workplace teams, community service providers as well as other groups. 2) Conflict Assessment/Consultation:PCRC can assist cities, as well as local community organizations and other groups to assess specific conflict situations, analyze concerns of stakeholders and develop strategies for pro-active and interest based conflict resolution.The conflict assessment process usually involves PCRC contacting stakeholders to gather input and provide information about conflict resolution options.An assessment report can be prepared and provided to the client. 3) Mediation Services for Complex Situations: PCRC's staff and volunteers provide the same high quality of mediation services in multi-party,multi-issue, complex disputes as we do for individual disputes.This may follow a conflict assessment/consultation as above in C.2. and requires a more advanced level of mediation training and experience. Examples of complex mediation situations include:workplace conflict between supervisor and,supervisee;workplace issues affecting a whole team; a neighborhood issue involving multiple households;a public controversy in which the City or other institution is involved. 4) Conflict Resolution System Design:PCRC assists organizations in building internal conflict resolution capacity,i.e.the development of policies and procedures for interest-based dispute prevention and early resolution. This service is tailored to the unique needs of the individual group,but is based on recognized and proven design principles. 5) Design and facilitation of Community Forums,Public Conversations,Dialogues: Through its Community Engagement Program, PCRC has developed expertise in managing public discussions. Working with local representatives,PCRC assists with the design and facilitation for a wide variety of group sessions in which members of the public are encouraged to participate in dialogue about issues that affect the health and well-being of the community. 6) Facilitation of planning sessions for Committees,Departments,Councils:PCRC will assist with the design and facilitation of planning sessions for elected, appointed and civic groups who are coming together to plan for the future. D. Administration of a Community Mediation Program:In collaboration with the contracting city, PCRC will administer a mediation program responsive to the needs of the community. PCRC may solicit input from city staff about unique areas of concern to a city and appropriate approaches to program implementation,improvement and promotion. E. Recruitment and training of community volunteers:PCRC will develop and maintain a pool of trained volunteer mediators, case developers and facilitators to serve the conflict resolution needs of the community. These residents of local communities will become skillful in the interest-based approach to conflict resolution. PCRC volunteers complete a minimum of 25 hours of training, according to regulations that govern programs receiving support from the California Dispute Resolution Trust Fund. PCRC also offers on-going skill development opportunities to volunteers to improve and enhance their conflict resolution skills. These volunteer will also serve as ambassadors in the community,promoting the ideas of interest-based conflict resolution. II. What the City of Burlingame will provide: A. Funding in the amount of$16,829 for Fiscal Year 2008-09.This fee is full payment for the services defined above. Payments will be made upon receipt of invoice. B. Support for the program from city officers and staff members, demonstrated through public statements,publicity, and referrals through city departments. C. At least one article or ad placed in a city run publication to promote the use of PCRC services among residents and businesses in the city.A PCRC staff person is available to work with a city contact person to develop this material. D. Assistance in scheduling appointments for PCRC representatives to make outreach presentations to groups of city staff, civic organizations and other relevant groups. This assistance should result in a minimum of 2 presentations in the city per year. E. No cost use of city-controlled public meeting space, as needed and as available,for training sessions,meetings and mediations. This use will be subject to the existing rules and regulations that govern the use of these spaces. III. Agreement by both parties,in concept: Both PCRC and the City recognize that this is an ongoing program. If the Community Mediation Program meets the terms of this agreement to the City's satisfaction, and in the absence of unexpected financial constraints,it is expected that the City will consider funding the Community Mediation Program, on an annual basis, as negotiated between the two parties. A Pev1IVASLA1C1 GOVX fli& Re_S01 Ati0V1 GehfeN G� Em owerin le. Buildin9 Nelationshi s. Re-dUcin violence. p 9 people. p 9 "Add-On" Training Packages For Contracting Cities These training packages are available if a city chooses to supplement its basic contact amount. Once the service is contracted for, implementation and scheduling will be done at the convenience of both the city and PCRC.In each case, PCRC staff would tailor the session to meet the needs of the group of trainees. Other training topics may be available. Please call Jennifer Bullock to ask. 1) Training in facilitation skills for City Boards and Commissions-$1000.00 for a 6 hour session for up to 30 participants Highlights: • Tools for managing group interaction • Listening skills for group settings • Tips for successful deliberation • Meeting management tools (agenda, group agreements, decision-making) • Tools for improving public input processes References from the City of San Mateo could be provided. 2) "Skills for Dealing with an Angry Public' a training for front line city staff-- $500 for a 3 hour session with up to 20 participants Highlights: • Tips for managing people with high emotions • Techniques for helping an angry citizen "feel heard" • Tools for helping people in conflict • Practice opportunities using realistic scenarios 3) "Skills for a Facilitative Leader": a workshop for city staff who are moving into leadership roles--$2000 for an 11 hour training, up to 20 participants Highlights • Enhancing effective communication skills • Tools for managing group interaction • Meeting management tools (agenda, group agreements, decision-making) • Conflict resolution techniques • Practice opportunities in pairs and small groups References from the City of Daly City could be provided. 1660 S.Ampklett Blvd.,#219•San A4ctfeo,CA 94402•650-513-0330* Fax 650-513-0335•www.percweb.org nonprofit commt4nHy resource serving San JVlateo County since 1986 Ve-ninsuila Cove f(icf ResokAfion Gentew G� Empowering people. Building relationships. Reducing violence. Promoting positive collaboration and active engagement through... Communit M ining Tnaement PCRC works with public PCRC provides skill- PCRC assists groups with PCRC provides neutral and private partners to building experiences for collaborative planning and assistance to promote active and schools and the broader problem solving efforts by individuals/groups, in a productive involvement by community in the areas of providing facilitation and wide array of conflict members of the community communication, conflict meeting management situations, to help them in public issues that impact resolution and establishing services. communicate effectively and their quality of life. environments that are find mutually acceptable respectful for all. resolutions to their concerns. HOW PCRC WORKS WITH CITIES • Coordinating joint city • Communication skills • Public meetings for input A place to refer: and community efforts • Meeting management / to city staff, council or • Neighbor disputes over for neighborhood safety facilitation commissions. property lines, noise, and quality of life • Conflict resolution • Departmental meetings parking, quality of life. improvement. • Community building for planning / problem- • Landlords /tenants • Consultation on processes. solving. disputes about rent strategies to engage • Skills for Difficult • Neighborhood meetings security deposits and community members Conversations • Consultation/coaching maintenance with city processes. • Appropriate for staff, on meeting process • Customer/business • Support for partnerships elected and appointed design, agendas, disputes. between community officials, and community facilitation skills. • Family disputes groups and city groups. • Workplace issues about representatives. teamwork. 1660 S. Amphlett Blvd., Ste. 219 San Mateo CA 94402 650-513-0330 *Fax:650-513-0335 zvww.percweb.org PevAiVlSl ICk Govt fli& ReS0ll�tfi0V1 CenfeV` ��� C�ti�poweving people. Btii�c�ing relationskips. Reducing violence. Dear City of Burlingame: The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center(PCRC)has proudly served the City of Burlingame for 11 years. During the July 1, 2006-June 30, 2007 program year,Burlingame was one of 12 local governments in San Mateo County that contracted with PCRC to provide low-cost community mediation services to its residents and business community. By contracting with PCRC you are not only subsidizing community mediation services available to your city(contracts give participants a 5070 discount to our already modest fee), you are also providing valuable support to PCRC in all the work that we do. The report enclosed is designed to give you a snap shot of the services we provided in your city specifically, as well as to show the breadth of services that your contract helps to support. Also included are statistics from the first half of the current program year(7/1/07-12/31/07). The annual report contains the following sections: ■ Mediation Services ■ Facilitation Services ` ■ Training Services ■ Community Building ■ Outreach ■ Appendixes: 1. Statistical summary of 1st half of 2006-2007 mediation activity in Burlingame 2. How PCRC Works with Cities 3. "Add-on Training Packages" One significant focus for PCRC this year is community outreach.We are committed to doing all that we can to make sure that residents and businesses in your community know that you are supporting PCRC's services and making them available to your constituents. Please remember that we need your help to let people know that our mediation service is available to them. I have included two documents that outline some of the expanded ways that PCRC can be a partner to cities, supplementing city efforts to reduce violence and build community.We are eager to be a partner and resource for you in addressing your own needs as a manager, employer, facilitator and civic leader who faces significant challenges and conflict in your role every day. As an organization, we are readying for new transition. Gemmie Jones, PCRC CEO since January 2007,has left her position with PCRC.All of PCRC's programs and services will continue uninterrupted and we will keep you, as our important partner, informed as plans for the future emerge. Please call me if you have any questions about this report or PCRC in general. M y anks, nn' ulloc c ss c e Director 1660 S.Amphlett Blvd.,##219•San)Mateo,CA 94402•650-513-0330•l=ax 650-513-0335'www,pc C_web.org A nonpNofit comm"VARY Nesow-ce seNving San JVlateo County since 1986 Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 06-07 Annual Report Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 2006-07 Annual Report of Services Mediation - Facilitation • Training - Community Engagement • Outreach Provided to the City of Burlingame During the 2006-2007 fiscal year, PCRC's services directly reached approximately 13,000 individuals throughout San Mateo County.Details about services in your city follow. Mediation PCRC opened a total of 17 new mediation cases'for Burlingame residents and businesses. Of this total, 14 cases were within the community mediation program, where issues like neighborhood disturbances, consumer complaints, rent increases, property maintenance and workplace issues are discussed. The total above also includes 3 family mediation cases.The "family mediation" category includes parent/teen mediations,Juvenile Dependency Types of Conflicts cases, and Family Visitation cases. Each of these programs uses a customized mediation model and specially trained Landlord/ volunteers. Other Tenant 6% 17% PCRC also provides specialized services to help resolve Neighbor complex,multi-party disputes. Sample situations are: a `40% zo% work team that is overcoming long-term conflicts; a group Cons/Bus of neighbors facing common concerns; disputes involving Cornrr"n, 12% homeowner associations. PCRC opened 26 complex cases 2% Worlgralce 3% Countywide during this program year. In Burlingame, PCRC conducted 5 mediations this year. Typically, PCRC and other community mediation programs find that about 25% of cases result in a face-to-face mediation. When a mediation is not desired or possible, PCRC may provide conciliation services (the mediator "shuttles" between parties by phone) or special assistance to one of the parties (e.g., coaching on communication skills). PCRC provided this type of assistance in another 4% of all mediation cases. Three of the mediations held in Burlingame resulted in an agreement and 100% were sustained over time. In all of our mediation programs, 82% of those resolutions were fully or partially sustained when PCRC mediators made follow-up calls (2 weeks or more after the meditation). Nearly 900 individual people were direct ✓ 90% of mediation clients who returned evaluation cards participants in PCRC's would recommend our services to others; 96% would use mediation programs our services again. this year. ✓ On a scale of 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree) clients gave PCRC an average score of 4.3 on "my overall experience was good" and 4.1 on "the mediation was valuable to me". Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 06-07 Annual Report Facilitation PCRC provides facilitation servicesz to groups that Sample facilitations: request assistance in achieving their objectives.We provide specially trained facilitators who help the ✓ Retreat for countywide service group plan meetings,manage group interactions, provider organization. and assist with group decision-making. ✓ Focus groups hosted by youth serving organization on various In 2006-2007 PCRC opened 52 new facilitation cases issues facing youth. and led nearly 170 meeting sessions countywide. ✓ City council budget priority setting sessions. Approximately 3500 people in San Mateo County ✓ Public input process on city participated in meetings facilitated by PCRC. planning department projects. In Burlingame,PCRC facilitated a series policy- development meetings for the staff of a non-profit. Training PCRC offers a wide range of training services to a variety of audiences. Throughout the County this year 12 training workshops were provided to community groups,boards, city staffs, and other groups on topics related to communication, problem-solving, and conflict resolution. In Burlingame,residents of Shelter Network shelters received training. In addition, PCRC's Schools Program focuses on providing services specifically to schools (K-12 and college level) including training teachers, staff, parents and students in conflict management, communication, bullying, respectful language and related skills. In 2006-2007, the Schools Program conducted 79 trainings for 46 different schools, school districts or other youth serving agencies throughout the county. In Burlingame,PCRC worked with Our Lady of Angels and Washington Elementary. In total, approximately 3700 students and adults received training from PCRC. Community Engagement Through the Community Engagement Programa PCRC encourages residents to work together and to become engaged in civic processes in order to understand and address community issues before they become divisive. This program includes planning and facilitating community forums, working with schools and parents to increase parental involvement in schools, coordinating collaborative projects to increase resident engagement Community Engagement Projects: in deteriorating neighborhoods. ✓ Parent Involvement in Schools ✓ Resident Involvement focused In 2006-2007 PCRC's parent involvement program on Violence Prevention involved over 1900 parents in four different schools. ✓ Pubic Participation in Civic Through our Strengthening Neighborhood Program Decision-Making PCRC coordinated over 1800 volunteer hours by ✓ Community Leadership residents dedicated to improving conditions in crime- Development Training ridden neighborhoods. PCRC worked on 38 community participation efforts with public institutions, providing planning, design and/or facilitation services. Pn op, 2 Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 06-07 Annual Report Outreach & Referral Sources The most common ways for clients to learn about our services is through city halls and police departments,word-of-mouth, and their own previous use of PCRC services. PCRC is also a resource for callers who need assistance other than mediation. In addition to the numbers of people who participated in PCRC services,volunteers and staff provided referral information or other assistance to over 350 individuals this year. We always have a Spanish speaker available to respond to inquiries. In the past year, over 20 outreach presentations were made to groups of city staff, rotary and other service clubs, neighborhood associations and other groups. In addition, we staff tables at fairs and events, advertise in community newsletters, and have created Public Service Announcements for local cable stations. We appreciate the partnerships that we have What you can do to help us reach out... with the City of Burlingame. Your support ensures that ✓ Think of us when there is a need for improved we can continue to deliver a communication in any setting. broad range of conflict resolution services and to ✓ Recommend us. Encourage your city officials and other promote non-adversarial key community leaders to recommend PCRC's services to approaches to resolving individuals, businesses and community groups. conflict. ✓ Visit our website: www.percweb.orq can provide you We look forward to with basic information about our services. You can also continuing to strengthen our make referrals to our services on the web. relationship and thereby strengthening the services ✓ Schedule an outreach presentation. that we provide. ✓ Keep PCRC brochures in stock at City Hall, libraries To learn more about any of and community centers. PCRC's services call us or visit our website: ✓ Include a paragraph or full article about us in your www.percweb.org. City or community newsletters. We are happy to provide copy for media publications. ✓ Read our newsletter. Our quarterly newsletter includes case stories, tips on handling conflict and news on the latest PCRC services. Community mediation programs are primarily funded by contracting municipalities,like yours,and the California Dispute Resolution Program Act. Family mediation programs are supported by the Human Services Agency and the Department of Child Support Services. '-Facilitation is primarily a fee-for-service program. s Civic engagement work is funded by the Silicon Valley Community Foundation,and is supported by Humana Services Agency, school districts and other collaborative partners. Pane 3 Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 2007-2008 Quarterly Mediation Report 2007-2008 Mediation Programs: Cases Opened and Calls Received BURLINGAME Types of Conflict Inquiries' 0 UO v z N c O '5 75 0 *r Z U U w0 U Totals: Quarter 1 0 1 01 0 01 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Totals: Quarter 2 0 1 0 1 01 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 Totals: Quarter 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: Quarter 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals to date 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 COUNTYWIDE Totals to date 191 3,51 81 41 01 111 251 6 108 6 45 2 Definition of Terms: - Family- Included in this conflict type are cases managed through PCRC specialized mediation programs for families:Parent/Teen,Juvenile Dependency, and Family Visitation Mediation Programs. - Complex cases -Cases are designated as"Complex"when they involve multiple parties and/or require on-going service. Complex cases are included in the total. - Inquiries-Calls to inquire about services but do not result in a case are included here. "Info and Referral" includes those calls that are referred to another resource or agency. "Info and Assistance" includes those calls that require more extensive assistance, such as research done on behalf of the caller orcoaching. Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center 2007-2008 Quarterly Mediation Report 2007-2008 Mediation Programs: Disposition of Closed Cases Case Outcomes Mediation Parti( BURLINGAME Agreements CU a UO U75 c -� v UO U 'd V u + 7� >' + 4 Q" U 0 u Q Z Z Totals: Quarter 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 Totals: Quarter 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Totals: Quarter 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: Quarter 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals to date 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 COUNTYWIDE Totals to date 16 0 1 18 33 29 2F 17 5 105 3 4 2 256 Definition of Terms: Mediation-Parties have met face-to-face in the presence of mediators for at least one session. Conciliation-PCRC worked with parties individually,but the parties did not meet face to face.The majority of the time these cases result in an agreement that resolves the situation. One Party Assist-If mediation or conciliation did not occur,but assistance was provided to one of the parties. Sustained-If an agreement is reached,PCRC contacts the parties at a later date to determine whether the agreement was fully, partially,or not sustained. Not Appropriate-PCRC staff determines that mediation is not appropriate in this particular situation. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH THE PENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER TO PROVIDE CONCILIATION AND MEDIATION SERVICES IN 2008-2009 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the City wishes to continue to provide a ready means by which its citizens can obtain ready, low cost, effective mediation and conciliation services to resolve conflicts that may arise between neighbors, landlords and tenants, consumers and business, and other persons; and WHEREAS,this service provides cost savings to the City in resolving disputes without the need for extensive City involvement while enhancing the community with better relations between citizens; and WHEREAS,the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center has provided this service to the community on a professional and able basis, NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement for and on behalf of the City. 3. The City Clerk is directed to witness the Manager's signature on behalf of the City. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of ,2008,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEM 3ERS: CITY CLERK CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA 9b ITEM# !1:1 m MTG. �FATEO JUNE� DATE June 16,2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT i BY DATE: June 9,2008 APP OVED B FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PROMOTIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR FY 08-09 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the annual promotional services contract with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce for FY2008-09 and authorize the City Manager to execute documents. BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame contracts with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to provide promotional and information services to businesses, visitors and residents. The services include: • Distribution of materials and information to businesses and residents about Burlingame programs, events and activities. • Referral services to businesses and residents about Burlingame city government. • Sponsor and coordinate community events involving merchants, businesses and the public. • Promotion of business, community and economic development activities. A complete listing of all services is included in the attached funding agreement document. The city budget contains $30,179 for this purpose. There is no recommended increase in the amount of the contract. Monthly payments to the Chamber will be $2,514.92. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreement with the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to Provide Information and Promotion Services in 2008-2009. Funding Agreement for Promotional Activities—Chamber of Commerce S:\Chamber of Commerce\Council Agenda Report FY08-09.doc AGREEMENT PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES —CHAMBER OF COMMERCE This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 1" day of July,2008, by and between the City of Burlingame, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as"City"), and the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce (hereinafter referred to as "Chamber"), with reference to the following Recitals: RECITALS: WHEREAS, City desires to promote its advantages as a business, educational, cultural, recreational and residential center, and to disseminate information relative thereto, and to properly respond to inquiries made from time to time relating to the various activities of City; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT: 1. Duties of Chamber. In exchange for the consideration specified in paragraph 3 below, Chamber shall perform the following promotional activities on behalf of City: a. Distribute materials and information to residents and businesses about Burlingame relating to the activities described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. b. Answer public inquiries about community facilities, events, organizations, businesses, and other community informational needs,through availability on a"walk-in"basis, as well as through mailings, telephone and e-mail. C. Provide referral services from citizens and businesses about appropriate City or government offices, including without limitation, the City Business License office (located in the Water Department), Recreation Department, Planning Department, Public Works Department,Police Department and Fire Department. d. Coordinate community events involving merchants and businesses requiring City services as needed and help promotion by City. e. Sponsor/coordinate/advertise special events and activities involving businesses and the public, including the following: (1) Produce Burlingame Art & Jazz Festival S:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc I (2) Assist with the December Merchant Holiday Open House and Tree Lighting Ceremony (3) Assist the Recreation Department with advertising the Burlingame-Millbrae Golf Tournament (4) Conduct seasonal Farmers Market (5) Sponsor Broadway Holiday Cheer event f Produce/distribute materials about Burlingame, as follows: (1) Burlingame/Hillsborough Street Map, including providing 1000 copies to the City of Burlingame g. Promote business, community and economic development through the activities described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. h. Assist City with the continuation of the currently operating commuter shuttle service between the Broadway Caltrain station and the business area East of the Bayshore Freeway. i. Promote the retention and relocation of businesses to City by participating (in conjunction with City) in the activities of San Mateo County Economic Development Association. j. Maintain and operate an office open to the general public for discharging the obligations of Chamber under the terms of this Agreement (including, without limitation,promoting the residential and business attributes of City to the public). k. Employ competent personnel to carry on the promotional activities enumerated herein. 1. Work to develop a partnership with the City of Burlingame's business improvement districts that include the exploration of: (1) Creating a"Buy Burlingame"campaign (2) Use of a joint website to promote Burlingame businesses 2. Certain Political Activities Prohibited. The Chamber shall not support, endorse or oppose any candidate for municipal, county or school elections in San Mateo County. The Chamber may conduct candidate debate forums or similar events of a public information nature. S:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc 2 3. Consideration. a. General Promotional Activities. City shall pay Chamber, in the manner specified below, the sum of Thirty Thousand, One Hundred and Seventy Nine Dollars ($30,179) for general promotional services performed by Chamber hereunder for the period commencing July 1, 2008, and ending June 30, 2009. The foregoing sum shall be paid in twelve equal consecutive monthly installments commencing July 1, 2008. Chamber shall send to City on the first (1S)day of each month a written invoice describing in a summary manner the services for which Chamber is to be paid. Invoices dated the first day of each month shall be paid no later than the fifteenth day of each month. 4. Assi ent. This Agreement shall not be assigned by Chamber without the written consent of City. 5. Notices. All written notices and demands which either party may serve on the other may, as an alternative to personal service, be served by registered or certified mail. Any such notice or demand so served shall be deposited in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid and addressed to the party at the address specified below: City: City Manager City Hall 501 Primrose Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Chamber: Chair, Burlingame Chamber of Commerce 290 California Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 Either party may change such address by notice in writing to the other party, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. 6. Relationship of parties. It is agreed the Chamber is an independent contractor and all persons working for or under the direction of Chamber or its agents, servants and employees are not agents or employees of City. 7. Termination. This Agreement shall commence on July 1,2008 and shall terminate on June 30,2009,unless extended by the parties in writing. 8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. S:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc 3 9. Entire Agreement. The terms of this Agreement are intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior or contemporaneous agreement. This Agreement constitutes the exclusive statement of its terms and no extrinsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial proceedings involving this Agreement. 10. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any litigation between the parties hereto to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, the unsuccessful party to such litigation shall pay to the successful party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the successful party, all of which may be included as part of the judgment rendered in such litigation. 11. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement should be invalid or unenforceable the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby, and every provision hereof shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 12. Headings. The title and headings of the various sections hereof are included for purposes of reference only and are not intended to place any construction on the provisions hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. CITY OF BURLINGAME: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: By By Jim Nantell, City Manager Georgette Naylor,President Attested: By By S:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc 4 EXHIBIT A DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE CITY OF BURLINGAME 1. Burlingame Demographics 2. Essential information for new Burlingame residents, including,without limitation, information materials for Burlingame Newcomers Club for all new Burlingame residents contacted by the club. 3. Community Event Information including: a. Art In The Park b. Broadway Festival (when applicable) c. Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival d. Concert In The Park Series e. Concerts at Kohl Mansion f. Public Elementary School, Public and Private High School Events g. Burlingame Night—S.F. Giants h. Burlingame-Millbrae Golf Tournament i. Burlingame & Broadway Area Business Improvement Districts. j. Merchant Sidewalk Sales (April & August) k. December—Merchant Holiday Open House and Tree Lighting 4. Public Transportation Information(Samtrans, Caltrain, BART and Burlingame Trolley) 5. Historical Information—Burlingame 6. Churches, parks and schools in Burlingame 7. Wedding/Meeting Sites Information 8. Clubs and Organizations Information 9. Hotel and Restaurant Information SAChamber of CommerceTunding Agreement FY 08-09.doc 5 10. Realtor Information 11. Burlingame Business relocation assistance 12. Burlingame Business Economic Profile 13. Publication handouts include: a. Burlingame/Hillsborough Street Map - including providing 1000 copies to the City of Burlingame b. San Mateo County Convention &Visitors Bureau County Image c. Burlingame Golf Center d. Burlingame Recreation Department Brochures (3 per year) e. Social Service Resources 14. Provide direction or resource information to meet unique or uncommon requests S:\Chamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES PROMOTING BUSINESS, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Promotion of special community meetings, seminars and special events 2. Promotion of community events and services 3. Information to Burlingame Elementary Schools about Burlingame 4. Chamber Membership Advertising and Promotional Budget promotes Burlingame in coordination with the Business Associations and Business Improvement Districts 5. Prepare publicity releases for Community Events 6. On-going business economic development programs: a. Hotels b. Office Buildings c. Providing SCORE counselor in Chamber office for business counseling 7. Chamber Representation at San Mateo County PROGRESS SEMINAR to study regional issues 8. Response to City of Burlingame requests regarding all business issues 9. Chamber/Business Annual Report—Independent Special Edition Insert 10. Promote the annual county business trade show 11. Burlingame Trolley 12. Assist the City of Burlingame in promoting commercial recycling activities and programs among Chamber membership. SAChamber of Commerce\Funding Agreement FY 08-09.doc 7 40 CITY G d v t r BURLINGAME � o' qm 4 �HnTEY JUNE 6 MEMORANDUM City of Burlingame City Clerk's Office To: City Departments in Record Center From: Doris Mortensen Date: February 24, 2005 Re: Destruction of Records Attached is a list of records that are scheduled for destruction according to the retention schedule as approved by the City Council. All records are over two years old and have been retained for the minimum retention period. The date scheduled for destruction is April 1, 2005. If you have any objection to the destruction of these records, please let me know prior to that date. I recommend you inspect your boxes prior to destruction. By signing below, you authorize destruction of these records. Please return this form to me and keep a copy for your records. To City Clerk/Records Manager: I have determined that these records are no longer needed for administrative or fiscal purposes, and they have no historical value. Department/Division Head Date RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH THE BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AND PROMOTION SERVICES IN 2008-2009 RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the City needs an ongoing public information service that can respond to inquiries from business,visitors, and residents about the public and private services available in the community; and WHEREAS,the City also needs a ready source of information and coordination of community events; and WHEREAS,there is also a need for local promotion of community events; and WHEREAS,Government Code sections 40100 and following allow the City to appropriate money to publicize and advertise the City; and WHEREAS,the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce has provided these services to the community on a timely, professional basis; and WHEREAS, the Chamber has agreed to assist in promoting commercial recycling activities and programs so that the City can continue to increase its recycling rate, NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the agreement for and on behalf of the City. 3. The City Clerk is directed to witness the Manager's signature on behalf of the City. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of 2008,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 9c ITEM# D0 MTG. JUHE DATE June 16,2008 DAATED 0 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL sUBnit BY DATE: June 9,2008 A ROVED B �G FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Finance Director's travel to Kansas City, Missouri to attend the Summer Meeting of the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council (GASAC), July 14-16, 2008. There is no impact on the City's budget. GASAC will cover the costs associated with the travel. BACKGROUND: The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) appointed Jesus to the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council. GASAC members serve four-year terms subject to annual reappointment by the ICMA Board of Directors. The GASAC holds three meetings per year(spring, summer and fall). Agenda Item 9d Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: 06/16/2008 0 5 SUBMITTED BA A APPROVED BY -2 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 4, 2008 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AND RESURFACING CO., INC. FOR 2008 STREET MICRO-SURFACING PROGRAM - CITY PROJECT NO. 82080 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding a construction contract to American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing Co., Inc. for the 2008 Street Micro-Surfacing Program in the amount of $151,924. It is also recommended that staff be authorized to issue change orders for additional work up to $30,000 in order to take advantage of the favorable bid prices and add Burlway Road to the project scope. BACKGROUND: The streets in the East Millsdale Industrial Park subdivision are in need of preventative maintenance repairs and are prioritized based on the City's pavement management program. Preventative maintenance repairs are performed on streets that are still in reasonably fair conditions with signs of small cracks or other minor defects. These timely repairs are necessary to prevent rapid deterioration of the roadway and will prolong the life of the streets. DISCUSSION: The project bids were opened on June 3, 2008, and four bids were received ranging from $151,924 to $165,692. American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing Co., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder with its bid amount of $151 ,924.01 being 14.1% below the engineer's estimate of $176,955. Staff has checked the references and believes that the contractor is well qualified to do the work. The project consists of street base failure repair and micro-surfacing using asphaltic emulsion and small aggregates on various streets in the East Millsdale Industrial Park subdivision (see attached map). The construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in July and will be completed by August. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\82080Award.doc In order to minimize the impact on the businesses in the area, the contractor is required to work at nights from 7:30 PM to 2:30 AM and/or on Sundays from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Staff will send construction notices to the businesses in the area and will work with the contractor to minimize the inconvenience as much as possible. BUDGET IMPACT: Following are the estimated project costs: Construction contract $151,924 Contingencies $ 30,000 Contract Administration $ 10,076 Construction Inspection 25,000 TOTAL $217,000 There are adequate funds in the project budget to cover the costs. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Bid Summary and project map. c: City Clerk, Contractor Victor oo Associat n ineer S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\82080Award.doc RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR STREET MICRO- SURFACING PROGRAM 2008 TO AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AND RESURFACING CO. INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 82080 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for proposals for the - CITY PROJECT 82080-CONTRACT FOR STREET MICRO-SURFACING PROGRAM 2008 WHEREAS, on JUNE 3, 2008, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AND RESURFACING CO. INC., submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of$151,924. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AND RESURFACING CO., for said project in the amount of$151,924.00, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2008, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Author,By Name\Joanne Louie\ResolutnAward.awd.doc CITY OF BURLINGAME BID SUMMARY STREET MICROSURFACING PROGRAM 2008 City Project No.82080 Engineees Estimate American Asphalt Repair& Valley Slurry Seal Co. Graham Contractors,Inc. California Pavement Maintenance Resurfacing Co.,Inc. Co.,Inc. Burlingame,CA Hayward,CA West Sacramento,CA San Jose,CA Sacramento,CA ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ESTIMATED UNI UNITPRICE TOTAL COST UNITPRICE 1 TOTAL COST UNITPRICE I TOTAL COST UNITPRICE I TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST QUANTITY SCHEDULE MICRO-SURFACING I Traffic Control 1 L.S. $ 15865.25 $ 15,865.25 $ 5525.00 $ 5,525.00 $ 11,800.00 $ 11800.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 19000.00 $8598.50 $ 6,598.50 2 A.C.DI Sealln-0Ul Re Ir 95 TON $ 125.00 $ 11,875.00 S 210.00 $ 19,950.00 $ 335.47 $ 31 869.65 $ 275.00 $ 28125.00 $ 285.011 E 25175.00 3 Crack t L.S. $ 5,ODO.00 $ 5000.00 $ 6000.00 $ 8,000.00 S 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12000.00 $7.949.00 i 7,945.00 4 MICfO-SUfFdGln 50,133 S.Y. $ 2.75 137865.75 $ 2.235 $ 112047.26 $ 1.977 $ 99.112.94 $ 2.00 $ 100266.00 $ 2.35 $ 117,812.55 5 T e"A"&"AY"Pavement Markers 132 EACH $ 4.00 $ 528.00 $ 5.00 $ 660.00 $ 5.04 $ 665.28 $ 6.00 $ 792.00 S 6.37 S 840.84 6 T e"D"&Blue Pavement Markers 34 EACH $ 7.00 $ 238.00 $ [5.00 $ 510.00 $ 14.70 $ 499.80 $ 16.00 $ 544.00 $ 19.11 $ 649.74 7 4"Solid Line-Thermoplastic 20 L.F. $ 5.00 $ 100.00 $ 1.00 $ 20.00 $ 0.73 $ 14.60 E 2.00 $ 40.00 $ 1.27 $ 25AD 8 6"Solid Line-Thermoplastic 20 L.F. I E 5.00 $ 100.00 $ 2.00 $ 40.00 $ 1.00 $ 20.00F$ 210.00 $ 60.00 $ 2.55 $ 51.00 9 8"Solid Line-Thermo lastic 20 L.F. $ 5.00 $ 100.00 $ 3.00 $ 60.00 E 1.20 $ 24.00 $ 80.00 E254.77 $ 76.40 10 12"Solid Line--ThemtO lastic 881 L.F. S 5.00 $ 4,405.00 $ 3.75 $ 3,303.75 $ 4.20 $ 3,700.20 $ 3.524.00 $ 4,21118 11 Pafkln Tees 2 EACH $ 25.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 21.00 $ 42.00 $ 210.00 $ 254.78 12 L ends&Aloes$-Thermo lastic 176 S.F. S 3.00 $ 528.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,408.00 $ 6.04 $ 1063.04 $ 1,584.00 $ 1,793.44 13 HandicapLegends 1 EACH $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 183.75 $ 183.75 $ 210.00 $ $ 254.77 Subtotal: $ 176 955.00 $ 167 924.01 $ 157 9538 $ 164,495.00S 166,691.60 `Calculated Amount differs from Bid Anlourd of$151,996.01 6WOD8 ,r j 1 i � v y MO t I Wo V7 NIN 4 2 A11 Agenda 9e Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: June 16,2008 .1 SUBMITTED BY(:::::!3 " k4am- APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 6, 2008 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REJECTING THE APPARENT LOW BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO BAY AREA PAVING FOR THE 2007-08 STREET CUTS AND PATCH MAINTENANCE PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution rejecting the low bid from Thomas Construction Company and awarding a contract to Bay Area Paving in the amount of $50,000 for the 2007-08 Street cuts and patch maintenance project. BACKGROUND: This project is an annual maintenance contract for utility trench repairs, minor street resurfacing, sidewalks, curb and gutter work on an as needed basis. The project is bid using hypothetical estimated bid quantities for the purposes of comparing bids and establishing unit prices for work to be performed. The actual work will not exceed the $50,000 budget allocation for the project. DISCUSSION: The project bids were opened on May 16, 2008, and three comparative bids were received ranging from $49,400 to $78,900. Thomas Construction Company is the apparent low bidder with its bid amount of $49,400. However upon verification of contractor's references and experience, staff finds that the apparent low bidder does not meet the project requirements and be rejected for the following reasons: • The references submitted by the apparent low bidder do not provide any information to substantiate Thomas Construction's ability to undertake this project and in fact, some of the references do not seem to exist. • The City has been unable to identify any previous similar work that Thomas Construction has done for any other public agency or other person that relates in any way to the work to be done under this project. • The bid submission was executed by an individual unauthorized to do so. Bay Area Paving is the lowest responsible bidder with its comparative bid amount of $71,825 and has met all the requirements for this project. Staff has verified the references and believes that Bay Area Paving is well qualified to do the work. BUDGET IMPACT: There are adequate funds in the 2007-08 water and sewer enterprise funds operating budgets to cover the costs. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Bid Summary RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIRMING REJECTION OF BID OF THOMAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO BAY AREA PAVING FOR THE 2007-2008 STREET CUT AND PATCH MAINTENANCE PROJECT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the City of Burlingame wishes to continue its street maintenance program in the 2007-2008 Cut and Patch Maintenance Project; and WHEREAS,the City issued an invitation for bids and received three sealed bids in response to the invitation; and WHEREAS,the apparent lowest bidder,Thomas Construction Company, listed certain qualifications and references,but City staff were unable to find any direct references regarding Thomas Construction Company as listed nor any previous street maintenance work by Thomas Construction Company nor has Thomas Construction provided the references that it later promised; and WHEREAS, in addition, Thomas Construction Company is a sole proprietorship and has no employees,but the bid was executed by a person who was represented as an employee or officer and was not the sole proprietor; and WHEREAS, it does not appear that Thomas Construction Company is currently qualified to perform the Cut and Patch Maintenance Project; and WHEREAS,the second lowest bid by Bay Area Paving is responsive to the City's specifications, and Bay Area Paving has extensive experience in street maintenance work in the Bay Area, NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find as follows: 1. The rejection of the bid of Thomas Construction Company by the Assistant Director of Public Works is affirmed. All bonds and security received from Thomas Construction Company in connection with the bid shall be returned to the bidder. 2. The Director of Public Works is authorized and directed to execute an agreement with Bay Area Paving for the 2007-2008 Street Cut and Patch Maintenance Project pursuant to the invitation to bids. 1 3. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Director of Public Works. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2008, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK U:\FILES\RESO\reject-awardbid2008.pwd.wpd 2 2007-08 Street Cuts and Patch Maintenance Project Bid Summary Thomas Construction Bay Area Paving Anza Engineering Line Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Unit Price Item Cost Unit Price Item Cost 1 2"AC patch 1000 sq It $ 3.90 $ 3,900.00 $ 4.90 $ 4,900.00 $ 6.00 $ 6,000.00 2 3"AC patch 1000 sq It $ 4.85 $ 4,850.00 $ 5.35 $ 5,350.00 $ 7.00 $ 7,000.00 3 4"AC patch 1000 sq It $ 5.65 $ 5,650.00 $ 6.80 $ 6,800.00 $ 8.00 $ 8,000.00 4 5"AC patch 1000 sq It $ 6.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 8.25 $ 8,250.00 $ 9.00 $ 9,000.00 5 6"AC patch 1000 sq ft $ 7.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 10.65 $ 10,650.00 $ 10.00 $ 10,000.00 6 Additional 1"Raises AC Patch 500 sq It $ 2.50 $ 1,250.00 $ 1.75 $ 875.00 $ 1.00 $ 500.00 7 Concrete Removal Only-Street(3"or 4") 500 sq ft $ 5.50 $ 2,750.00 $ 6.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 7.20 $ 3,600.00 8 6"Concrete Sidewalk Repair 500 sq it $ 8.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 14.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 15.00 $ 7,500.00 9 6"Concrete Curb and Gutter 600 In ft $ 15.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 30.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 33.00 $ 19,800.00 10 6"Concrete Driveway Repair 500 sq it $ 10.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 14.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 15.00 $ 7,500.00 Total $ 49,400.00 Total $ 71,825.00 Total $ 78,900.00 0g, CITY ,u STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 9f ITEM # Ib MTG. 6/16/08 DATE NATE° JUIN b• TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBNHTTED BY �"_... DATE: June 16 2008 APPROVED FROM: Deirdre Dolan Human Resources Director BY SUBJECT: Approval of Labor Agreement with Fire Administrators RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the resolution authorizing the City Manager to incorporate the tentative agreement between the Fire Administrators and the Central County Fire Department into the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for this unit. The comprehensive tentative agreement is attached to this report as Exhibit A. BACKGROUND: Central County Fire Department is a joint powers agency of the City of Burlingame and the Town of Hillsborough. The Fire Administrators represent the Central County Fire Department Division Chief, Battalion Chief, and Fire Marshal classifications. The labor agreement expired on March 31 , 2008 after a four-year term. The City and Town have been meeting with the Fire Administrators for several weeks to negotiate the terms of a new agreement. The City and Town reached tentative agreement with IAFF on June 37 2008. The Town of Hillsborough approved the agreement at their June 9, 2008 meeting. The major components of the tentative agreement are as follows: Term: 5 years; April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2013 . Salary: 6. 13% increase effective December 24, 2007 Effective the first pay period including January 1, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, the salary will be increased to 4th in the market place based upon a salary survey. The minimum increase shall be 2.0%; the maximum increase shall be 5.0%. Retirement: The current language in the MOU will be maintained, except the re-opener will be limited to one time instead of annual. The current language provides for the possibility of implementing the 3% at 50 benefit if the cost is no more than 5% greater than the current cost of the 3% at 55 benefit. Should the 3% at 50 benefit be implemented, there would be a corresponding reduction in retiree medical benefits, and cost-sharing with the association for the 3% at 50 retirement benefit. Retiree Medical: A minimum of five years of service with the Department will be required to qualify for a retiree medical benefit. BUDGET IMPACT: The City and Town share the cost of Central County Fire Department on a 60%City of Burlingame, 40% Town of Hillsborough basis. The City's 60% share of the estimated cost of the new agreement is $32,700 in salary and benefit costs for the first year of the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution for Fire Administrators Agreement Exhibit A—Comprehensive Tentative Agreement RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH AND THE FIRE ADMINISTRATORS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough and the Fire Administrators have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and conditions of employment as provided by State law; and WHEREAS,the City and the Fire Administrators have reached agreement on certain changes to be made to the existing terms and,conditions of employment and memorandum of understanding between the City and Fire Administrators; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public and the employees represented by the Fire Administrators; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The changes in existing salary of the employees represented by the Fire Administrators as contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in Exhibit A and incorporate them into the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Burlingame, Town of Hillsborough and Fire Administrators. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 160'day of June, 2008, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY CLERK Exhibit A City/Town Tentative Agreement with Fire Administrators June 3,2008 Term—April 1, 2008 —March 31, 2013 3.1 Salary Increases Effective: Year 1 6.13% effective December 24, 2007 Year 2 Effective the first pay period including January 1, 2009, the salary will be increased to 4d'in the market place (using survey in Section 6.1 of the MOU). Year 3 Effective the first pay period including January 1, 2010, the salary will be increased to 4h in the market place(using survey in Section 6.1 of the MOU). Year 4 Effective the first pay period including January 1, 2011, the salary will be increased to 4t'in the market place (using survey in Section 6.1 of the MOU). Year 5 Effective the first pay period including January 1, 2012, the salary will be increased to 4t'in the market place (using survey in Section 6.1 of the MOU). The minimum increase shall be 2.0%, the maximum increase shall be 5.0%. This shall apply to each year a salary survey is conducted 3.2 Ability to Pad Eliminated. 8.3.1 Sick Leave Incentive Plan The Sick Leave Incentive Plan below shall only be implemented when the average sick leave usage for the bargaining unit is equal to or less than 2.4 shifts per employee. If the average sick leave usage is more than 2.4 shifts, then the Sick Leave Incentive Plan will not be implemented for that calendar year. Long term sick leave (6 or more shifts for the same illness or injury) will be excluded from the calculation of the average. Exhibit R A. For 56-hour unit members, two (2) shifts of vacation time or pay at straight time shall be awarded for use of one (1) shift of sick leave or less. Members shall receive one (1) shift of vacation time or pay at straight time for the use of two (2) shifts of sick leave or less. B. For 40-hour unit members, four (4) days of vacation time or pay at straight time shall be awarded for use of one (1) day of sick leave or less. Members shall receive two (2) days of vacation time or pay at straight time for the use of three (3) days of sick leave or less. 9.1 Medical Modify to a Flexible benefit language to allow for the 5 years vesting on the retiree medical 9.3 Vision Employees shall be covered by the City of Burlingame Vision Care Reimbursement Plan. (Language change only.) 9.7 Retiree Medical Contribution Current employees and those hired prior to the implementation of the 3% @ 50 benefit will have a retiree medical contribution that equals the amount received by active employees of the Union, provided such employees have a minimum of five years of service with the Department. 18 Retirement 18.12 In the event the Department does not agree to contract for the 3% @ 50 benefit per Appendix B of this agreement then-efketive July ', 2007, the Department shall maintain a contract with the Public Employee's Retirement System for retirement benefits based upon the 3% @ 55 Local Safety Plan (GC Section 21362.2). The Fire n dministf ter- are not s„bjeet to the pur-chase plan as stated in Appendix B- Appendix B 18.15 3%@ 50 Benefit Enhancement One time during the term of this agreement, the City will order an actuarial evaluation for the 3% @ 50 benefit. If the "Base Retirement Rate" of the 3% @ 50 benefit is equal to or less than the "Base Retirement Rate" as defined below, the agencies will implement the 3% @ 50 benefit. Exhibit A The 'Base Retirement Rate" is calculated by adding the July 1, 2007 rate of the 3% @ 55 benefit for the City of Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough. The 'Base Retirement Rate" is as follows: ➢ City of Burlingame 3% @ 55 rate= 16.1222% ➢ Town of Hillsborough 3% @ 55 rate=28.427% ➢ Base Retirement Rate: (16.1222%+28.427%)=44.549% The 'Base Retirement Rate for the 3% @ 50 benefit will be determined by adding the rate of the 3% @ 50 benefit for the City of Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough. If the City and Town merge their respective Ca1PERS fire retirement accounts into one retirement contract with Ca1PERS, the parties will meet and confer on the impact such a retirement plan merger may have on the base retirement rate of future benefits and modify the formula accordingly. 18.16 Fire Department Benefit Purchase Option When the actuarial evaluations are received from Ca1PERS, the City and Town will meet with the Union and review the cost data. If the 3% @ 50 base retirement rate is no more than 5% higher than the 3% @ 55 "base retirement rate" the Union can elect to pay for one-half of the difference. Such payment will be deducted from salary and will be effective January 1 preceding the July 1 implementation date of the 3% @ 50 benefit. The following table illustrates the Union Benefit Purchase Option: 3%@ 55 Base Retirement 3% @ 50 Base Increase in Base Union Benent Purchase Rate Retirement Rate Retirement Rate Cost(salary deduction 44.549% 45.549% 1% .5% 44.549% 46.549% 2% 1% 44.549% 47.549% 3% 1.5% 44.549% 48.549% 4% 2% 44.549% 49.549% 5% 2.5% The percentage paid by the membership under the Union Benefit Purchase option will remain fixed and unchanged for a period of 3 years (36 months). Unless the Department determines otherwise, the payment will be made on an after-tax payroll deduction. At the end of the 3 years (36 months), the City and Town will pay for the employer cost of the retirement plan. Any percentage of salary paid by the membership for the 3% @ 50 benefit will be added back to base salary when performing salary surveys per Appendix D of this agreement. The deduction will be on an after-tax basis. Exhibit A 32.16 Retiree Medical Contribution Current employees and those hired prior to the implementation of the 3% @ 50 benefit will have a retiree medical contribution that equals the amount received by active employees of the Union. Employees hired on or after the date 3% @ 50 benefit is enacted with Ca1PERS will receive retiree medical contributions based on years of service with the fire department. The retiree medical contribution for employees that have a service retirement will be as follows: Years of Service Medical Contribution 0-end of 9th year of service Minimum monthly amount as governed by the Ca1PERS Health System. 10 years to the end of the 14th 50%of the lowest premium for employee plus one dependent. year of service 15 years to the end of the 19th 75%of the lowest premium for employee plus one dependent. year of service 20 years of service or more 100% of the lowest premium for employee plus one de endent. Employees hired after the implementation of 3% @ 50 and that have an industrial disability retirement will have a retiree medical contribution as follows: Years of Service Medical Contribution 0 -end of the 19th year of 75%of the lowest premium for employee plus one dependent service 20 years of service or more 100%of the lowest premium for employee plus one dependent I I r $1,824,199.01 Ck. No. 32637 - 33271 Excludes Library Cks. 32772 -32813 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for May 2008 $3,812,038.30 Ck. No. 171501 - 171815 Note: 3 Pay periods in May INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS & ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION C cD m o CD 3 S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS p CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-05-2008 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 14 FUND RECAP 07-08 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 89, 076. 53 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 10, 643 . 72 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6, 857. 71 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 3 , 111 . 28 WATER FUND 526 13,457.84 SEWER FUND 527 6, 294 . 07 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 485 . 50 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 2,617. 57 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 7,689. 05 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 16, 229.30 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 22,916 .98 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1 ,327. 74 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,478.44 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 3, 271 .86 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 120 . 00 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 55 , 117. 23 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $241 ,694 .82 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL : THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 14 INCLUSIVE , AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 33092 THROUGH 33271 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $241 ,694.82, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON . RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / . . ./ . . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ . . ./ . . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 13 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33263 BRUCE KAISER 28563 12.00 MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 101 36330 000 1789 33264 KATE KURTZMAN 28564 12.00 MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 101 36330 000 1789 33265 CYNTHIA AL-JAMEA 28565 108.00 MISCELLANEOUS 108.00 101 36330 000 1660 33266 NATASHA SPENCER 28566 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 33267 LISA CURRIER 28567 81.00 MISCELLANEOUS 81.00 101 36330 000 1782 33268 PENNY BENJAMIN 28568 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 33269 LINO SIU 28569 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 33270 RIK LAL 28570 56.00 MISCELLANEOUS 56.00 101 36330 000 1789 33271 SARA WOJCIECHOWSKI 28571 8.00 MISCELLANEOUS 8.00 101 36330 000 1789 TOTAL 8241,694.82 - CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33248 JENNY NGO 28548 1 ,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 33249 MARY LOU & DOUG MORTON 28549 11090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 33250 FMCS 28550 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 33251 BARBARA LANDUCCI 28551 1 ,280.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1 ,280.00 101 22520 33252 VALERIE KAURIN 28552 1 ,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 33253 MR/MRS CARUSO 28553 118.00 MISCELLANEOUS 118.00 101 36330 000 1781 33254 MR/MRS RUIZ-JOHNSON 28554 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33255 DEAN & URSULA WILLIAMS 28555 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33256 MAY YEH 28556 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33257 LAURA GARDNER 28557 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33258 DIANE HONG 28558 118.00 MISCELLANEOUS 118.00 101 36330 000 1781 33259 MR/MRS. KAJISA 28559 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33260 OIWAI LAM 28560 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33261 LUIS GRILLO 28561 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1789 33262 MELIAME HALAUFIA 28562 12.00 MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 101 36330 000 1789 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33234 MR/MRS WUNDERLICH 28534 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33235 DANELLE RIENKS 28535 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33236 YOLANDA LIU 28536 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33237 MR/MRS MCALLISTER 28537 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33238 MR/MRS HERTZ 28538 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33239 REBECA PATINO 28539 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33240 DIANE RUSSELL 28540 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33241 MR/MRS CARLEN 28541 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33242 DENISE MCDONALD 28542 95.00 MISCELLANEOUS 95.00 101 36330 000 1646 33243 SAN MATEO POLICE DEPARTMENT 28543 3,500.00 COMMUNICATIONS 1,500.00 101 65100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 1,500.00 101 65150 160 MISC. SUPPLIES 500.00 530 65400 120 33244 SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGIONAL WATER 28544 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 320 81760 220 33245 CALLISON 28545 1,670.00 MISCELLANEOUS 870.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 33246 SIMON JANG 28546 1,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 33247 FARIBA MOKHATARI KARCHGANI 28547 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22525 CITY OF BURLINGAME WAR RANT RE G I ST ER PAGE 10 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33218 KEKY DUREN 28107 2,830.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,830.00 730 69588 120 33219 ZEIGER ENGINEERS INC 28129 1,274.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,274.00 320 81870 210 33220 MIKE KERWIN 28232 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33221 ABD INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SVCS 28426 6,750.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,750.00 101 64550 210 33222 SIMON JONES 28494 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33223 U.S. HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL GROUP 28499 343.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 275.00 101 64420 121 TRAINING EXPENSE 68.00 527 66520 260 33224 JIM SCHLOETTER 28521 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33225 MR/MRS HANSEN 28525 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33226 MR/MRS. KRAKOW 28526 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33227 SUSAN BENTON 28527 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS - 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33228 MR/MRS DICKSON 28528 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1331 33229 MR/MRS GLICKMAN 28529 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33230 MR/MRS. JOLLY 28530 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1331 33231 MR/MRS WHITTEN 28531 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33232 MR/MRS. WATSON 28532 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33233 MR/MRS. WOLIN 28533 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33202 PUTNAM CHEVROLET CADILLAC HUMMER 27245 22,282.27 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 22,282.27 620 66700 800 33203 AT&T MOBILITY 27713 142.89 COMMUNICATIONS 142.89 101 64250 160 33204 AT&T MOBILITY 27714 65.93 COMMUNICATIONS 65.93 101 64150 160 33205 AT&T MOBILITY 27716 32.31 COMMUNICATIONS 32.31 101 64100 160 33206 AT&T MOBILITY 27717 255.56 COMMUNICATIONS 255.56 101 66100 160 33207 AT&T MOBILITY 27722 42.33 COMMUNICATIONS 42.33 530 65400 160 33208 AT&T MOBILITY 27724 538.58 COMMUNICATIONS 538.58 201 65200 160 33209 AT&T MOBILITY 27725 110.15 COMMUNICATIONS 110.15 201 65200 160 33210 AT&T MOBILITY 27744 2,48 COMMUNICATIONS 2.48 101 65100 160 33211 AT&T MOBILITY 27760 921.25 UTILITY EXPENSE 921.25 896 20281 33212 AT&T MOBILITY 27763 12.38 COMMUNICATIONS 12.38 201 65200 160 33213 PRE PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 27801 93.65 MISCELLANEOUS 93.65 130 21019 33214 DAVINA DRABKIN 27902 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33215 ADVANCED INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLO 28004 3,222.56 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,222.56 527 66520 220 33216 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 28021 3,261.61 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,261.61 130 20021 33217 SARAH H. WILEY 28036 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33187 JENNY COLEMAN 25874 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 33188 DAN PAULUS 25917 625.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 625.00 201 65200 260 33189 KIMATHI MARANGU 25928 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33190 DIMITRI RALLY 26120 118.00 MISCELLANEOUS 118.00 101 36330 000 1781 33191 COIN TECH 26173 203.60 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 203.60 530 65400 200 33192 CHRISTINE THORSTEINSON 26198 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33193 ANNE INGRAM 26314 60.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1349 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 33194 KRISTI BLISS 26489 60.00 MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1349 33195 EDWARD R BACON CO 26515 2,877.43 MISCELLANEOUS 2,877.43 101 66210 400 33196 MIKE ADAM 26517 210.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.00 101 68010 220 1788 33197 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 99.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 99.64 526 69020 110 33198 BRIAN HUFF 26954 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1331 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 33199 REDWOOD TRADING POST 27020 210.98 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 210.98 619 64460 140 33200 COLLEEN HALLEN-SALAS 27047 60.00 MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1349 33201 ANITA HORNUNG 27147 20.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33171 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 4,450.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 4,450.00 526 69020 290 33172 BRIAN WACHHORST 24372 1,100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,100.00 101 68010 220 1950 33173 ALERT-ALL 24392 1,177.22 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,177.22 201 65200 120 33174 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 78.00 UNION DUES 78.00 130 21080 33175 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 33176 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 620.00 MISCELLANEOUS 620.00 130 20024 33177 C.L.E.A. 24523 487.50 MISCELLANEOUS 487.50 130 20026 33178 STANDARD INSURANCE CO. RB 24525 1,188.70 MISCELLANEOUS 1,188.70 130 20025 33179 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 504.00 UNION DUES 504.00 130 21091 33180 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 320.60 130 21092 33181 AETNA 24760 3,909.66 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,909.66 130 20022 33182 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 377.74 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 377.74 201 65200 200 33183 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 148.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.15 101 64200 110 TRAINING EXPENSE 81.65 201 65200 260 33184 ROCHE GEORGE 25323 120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1788 33185 LARISA YAGLONITSER 25517 1,029.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,029.00 101 68010 220 1349 33186 TOM MONTROSS 25723 90.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 101 68010 220 1788 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33159 T. RANDOLPH GRANGE 23112 500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 101 22525 33160 OFFICE MAX 23306 255.24 OFFICE EXPENSE 297.63 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 194.64 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE -237.03 101 64250 110 33161 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 158.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 158.80 619 64460 120 33162 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 49. 14 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 49. 14 530 65400 200 33163 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 341 .95 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.92 619 64460 120 5250 MISC. SUPPLIES 313.03 619 64460 120 5130 33164 AT&T 23661 48.30 COMMUNICATIONS 48.30 621 64450 160 33165 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 1 ,816.53 TRAINING EXPENSE 604.00 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 604.53 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 608.00 527 66520 260 33166 AT&T/MCI 23728 11 ,604.83 COMMUNICATIONS 22.32 101 64250 160 MISCELLANEOUS 60.72 101 68020 192 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 111 .18 201 65200 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 111410.61 896 20281 33167 JEFF NOVITZKY 23802 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33168 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1 ,211 .55 MISC. SUPPLIES 517.79 101 68010 120 1111 MISC. SUPPLIES 217.42 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 88.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 388.34 619 64460 220 5130 33169 CHRISTINE GRANUCCI 24197 1 ,650.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1 ,650.00 101 64420 210 33170 JESUS NAVA 24204 783.08 MISCELLANEOUS 783.08 101 64250 031 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33144 CHUCK WITT 21491 2,000.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,000.00 101 64420 210 33145 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 3,937.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,312.50 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,312.50 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,312.50 527 66520 260 33146 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 353.72 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 353.72 101 66210 222 33147 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 155.61 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 155.61 101 68020 200 2200 33148 GARY ROBB 22101 3,118.68 MISCELLANEOUS 3,118.68 101 65150 010 33149 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 137.00 SUPPLIES 137.00 620 15000 33150 DAVID DJANIKIAN 22447 30.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.00 101 68010 220 1788 33151 HELMIG CONSTRUCTION 22501 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 33152 TODD VARLAND 22679 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1349 33153 JOHN FLYGARE 22696 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33154 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 22794 1,100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,100.00 320 81760 220 33155 RUSS PAPE CONSTRUCTION 22977 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 33156 A&B TRAILER HITCH CO. 22998 294.22 SUPPLIES 294.22 620 15000 33157 MCMILLAN ELECTRIC 23066 9,880.72 MISCELLANEOUS 9,880.72 619 64460 804 5110 33158 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 1,500.00 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 526 69020 764 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 527 66520 764 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33129 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 46.73 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.69 101 64200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.68 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.68 101 64350 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.68 101 64420 120 33130 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 2,291.50 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 148.79 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,142.71 625 65213 203 33131 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 33132 INTRALINE INC 20097 1,555.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,555.32 619 64460 120 5120 33133 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 1,279.44 COMMUNICATIONS 1,279.44 621 64450 160 33134 MARYAM REFAHI 20320 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33135 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 480.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 480.00 619 64460 210 5250 33136 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 1,793.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,793.50 530 65400 210 33137 BAYSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS INC. 20650 173.20 MISC. SUPPLIES 173.20 527 66520 120 33138 PHYLLIS E. EVERSON 20833 349.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 349.85 730 69585 120 33139 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC 20986 30.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 30.00 101 65100 260 33140 MELANIE MARANI 21132 752.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 752.00 101 68010 220 1331 33141 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 3,525.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,525.00 101 68010 220 1331 33142 CEB 21210 127.49 MISC. SUPPLIES 127.49 101 64350 120 33143 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 79.17 MISC. SUPPLIES 79.17 101 68010 120 1101 I CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33113 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 1,969.95 MISCELLANEOUS 1,969.95 101 30400 33114 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 69.15 MISC. SUPPLIES 69.15 619 64460 120 33115 DON E. GIOVANNETTI 15229 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1788 33116 TIM GLENO 15629 90.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 101 68010 220 1788 33117 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,900.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,900.00 101 68010 220 1787 33118 CUMMINS WEST, INC. 16414 203.49 SUPPLIES 203.49 620 15000 33119 OTTO MILLER 17129 350.00 MISCELLANEOUS 350.00 101 22525 33120 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 822.16 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 822.16 201 65200 203 33121 ACCURATE MAILINGS, INC 17623 3,418.32 MISCELLANEOUS 3,418.32 526 69020 233 33122 GORDON E. MC CLINTOCK 17702 867.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 867.50 618 64520 210 33123 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 316.09 TRAINING EXPENSE 316.09 101 65150 260 33124 DEESIGNS 18388 2,425.36 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,425.36 526 69020 120 33125 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 8,091.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,091.00 101 64560 220 33126 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 485.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 485.50 528 66600 210 33127 BAY ALARM 18854 378.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 333.00 619 64460 210 5140 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 45.00 619 64460 210 5230 33128 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 478.66 TRAINING EXPENSE 478.66 201 65200 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33104 PIP PRINTING 10620 237.28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 237.28 320 81790 220 33105 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 1,052.64 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,052.64 618 64520 210 33106 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 335.73 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 335.73 625 65213 203 33107 LEE STAMBOLIS 11361 120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1788 33108 CHIEF DON DORNELL 11568 2,265.84 OFFICE EXPENSE 100.20 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 468.75 201 65200 120 MISCELLANEOUS 50.34 201 65200 144 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 262.95 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 60.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 24.00 201 65500 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,041.60 201 65200 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 138.00 201 65500 260 MISCELLANEOUS 120.00 731 22554 33109 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 2,267.06 OFFICE EXPENSE 212.89 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 50.82 101 65150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 47.25 101 65100 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 110.32 101 65100 140 COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 23.93 101 65100 200 GAS, OIL & GREASE 10.00 101 65100 201 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 298.50 101 65150 220 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,222.63 101 65100 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 27.12 101 65150 260 PRISONER EXPENSE 16.60 101 65100 291 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 18.00 101 65100 292 OFFICE EXPENSE 29.00 530 65400 110 33110 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 139.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 139.64 101 65100 110 33111 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 2,177.77 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,177.77 619 64460 210 33112 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS 14414 795.56 PRISONER EXPENSE 795.56 101 65100 291 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/05/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33092 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 53.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 53.13 619 64460 120 5250 33093 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,224.35 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 927.53 101 66210 226 MISC. SUPPLIES 296.82 526 69020 120 33094 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 165.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 165.51 619 64460 120 33095 P. G. & E. 03054 60,828.68 GAS & ELECTRIC 18,043.31 101 66100 170 UTILITY EXPENSE 42,785.37 896 20280 33096 TAP PLASTICS 03739 97.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 97.75 619 64460 120 5140 33097 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 4,800.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,800.00 101 64250 114 33098 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 142.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 142.92 619 64460 120 33099 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 5,768.91 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,117.50 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 4,651.41 618 64520 601 33100 WFCB OSH COMMERCIAL SERVICES 09670 1,489.26 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.63 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 35.54 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 929.53 101 68020 130 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 15.01 101 68020 190 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 74.09 101 66210 219 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 89.02 101 66210 222 SMALL TOOLS 100.67 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.82 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 114.99 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.96 619 64460 120 5150 33101 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 811.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 811.88 101 65100 220 33102 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 09990 92.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 92.01 730 69593 120 6017 33103 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 3,418.47 COMMUNICATIONS 3,418.47 101 65100 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME 05-30-2008 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 FUND RECAP - 07-08 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 80,730.56 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6,438.51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 7,500.00 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 71,872.69 WATER FUND 526 256,320.83 SEWER FUND 527 388.65 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 16,081.13 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,408.40 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 585.94 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 82,265.33 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 4,569.93 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,370.87 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 137,370.23 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 1,949.74 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $671,852.81 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 32993 THROUGH 33091 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $671,852.81, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33081 IVAN BARAJAS 28514 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 33082 MR/MRS. RUBERO 28515 155.00 MISCELLANEOUS 155.00 101 36330 000 1349 33083 PAUL KNUDSON 28516 148.00 MISCELLANEOUS 148.00 101 36330 000 1785 33084 MARYLOU K. CRONIN 28517 148.00 MISCELLANEOUS 148.00 101 36330 000 1785 33085 KAREN LYNCH 28518 148.00 MISCELLANEOUS 148.00 101 36330 000 1785 33086 MIKE DUNIGAN 28519 58.00 MISCELLANEOUS 58.00 101 36330 000 1422 33087 JOAN CLANG 28520 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1422 33088 JIM SCHLOETTER 28521 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33089 MR/MRS AHN 28522 126.00 MISCELLANEOUS 126.00 101 36330 000 1331 33090 NICOLE HALL 28523 143.00 MISCELLANEOUS 143.00 101 36330 000 1331 33091 MR/MRS. PRICE 28524 126.00 MISCELLANEOUS 126.00 101 36330 000 1331 TOTAL $671,852.81 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 33065 NADJYA GHAUSI 28498 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1331 33066 U.S. HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL GROUP 28499 110.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 110.00 101 64420 121 33067 N JAMES PARKER 28500 1,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500.00 730 69593 220 6017 33068 HILT I INC 28501 733.27 TRAINING EXPENSE 733.27 201 65200 260 33069 MH SOFTWARE INC 28502 432.00 MISCELLANEOUS 432.00 731 22557 33070 A.I.R. 28503 395.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 395.00 619 64460 260 33071 MRS. BUTTERWORTH 28504 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 33072 FRED&VALERIE HERON 28505 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 730 39593 000 6017 33073 JILL SOLEY 28506 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 33074 MR. &MRS. AKHAVEIN 28507 155.00 MISCELLANEOUS 155.00 101 36330 000 1349 33075 BRIDGE HOUSING COPORATION 28508 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 33076 ANITA GALEANA 28509 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 33077 VANESSA KAMMULLER 28510 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 33078 CHRISTINE TEHLIRIAN 28511 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 33079 JEAN DISALVO 28512 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 33080 ALICIA NEWTON 28513 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33050 CHRIS KENNON 26605 9,665.52 MISCELLANEOUS 9,665.52 101 22546 33051 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 27057 80.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 80.00 101 64420 262 33052 REBECCA SIMPSON 27511 1 ,450.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,450.00 101 22546 33053 AT&T MOBILITY 27713 55.55 COMMUNICATIONS 55.55 101 64250 160 33054 SPINITAR 27823 3,858.26 MISCELLANEOUS 3,858.26 621 64450 400 33055 4 LEAF INC 27948 18,775.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,775.00 327 81800 210 33056 A+ SPANISH ACADEMY 27960 1 ,029.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,029.60 101 68010 220 1349 33057 LYNNE VITERO 28082 846.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 846.00 101 68010 220 1349 33058 SHIHUA WANG 28083 846.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 846.00 101 68010 220 1349 33059 COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND AR 28091 2,097.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,097.00 101 68010 220 1349 33060 TELADATA 28130 7,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,500.00 320 80250 220 33061 CHRISTOPHER CADWALLADER 28152 360.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 360.00 101 68010 220 1349 33062 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #925 28197 60.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 60.00 201 65200 260 33063 RICOH AMERICAS CORP 28221 854.28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 761 .76 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 92.52 101 65150 220 33064 YANG MIN YANG 28390 1 ,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33036 KEVIN PARKIN 24088 8,040.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 8,040.00 101 22520 33037 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 3,408.40 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 3,408.40 530 65400 210 33038 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,431.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,431.75 101 68010 220 1646 33039 NEIL YELLIN 24220 1,040.00 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 101 22525 33040 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 940.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 940.00 101 68010 220 1660 33041 CASEY PERA 24829 625.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 625.00 201 65200 260 33042 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 1,800.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,800.00 101 68010 220 1349 33043 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 963.97 OFFICE EXPENSE 293.87 101 65100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 547.49 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 68.50 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.11 201 65200 120 33044 TES 25256 80,545.00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 80,545.00 620 66700 800 33045 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 25377 1,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500.00 201 65200 220 33046 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING FOUNDATION- 25466 500.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 500.00 101 64250 210 33047 ROBERT GILSON 25616 8,362.50 MISCELLANEOUS 8,362.50 101 22546 33048 DAVID TILLMAN 26224 1,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22525 MISCELLANEOUS 290.00 101 36630 33049 DIANE SILVEN 26422 1,200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33021 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 935.81 SUPPLIES 935.81 620 15000 33022 BRIDGE WIRELESS 20633 238.44 COMMUNICATIONS 238.44 620 66700 160 33023 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 403.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 403.03 621 64450 110 33024 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 80.54 SUPPLIES 80.54 620 15000 33025 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 63.21 SMALL TOOLS 63.21 526 69020 130 33026 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,520.00 MISCELLANEOUS 285.00 201 35221 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 1,235.00 201 35220 000 7100 33027 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 164.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 164.50 101 68010 220 1645 33028 OFFICE MAX 23306 35.23 OFFICE EXPENSE 68.83 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 104.06 201 65200 110 33029 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 83.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83.20 101 68010 220 1762 33030 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 14,967.49 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,967.49 327 81800 210 33031 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 10,080.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,080.00 101 68010 220 1331 33032 D.A. POPE INC. 23783 7,200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 7,200.00 101 22546 33033 MAD SCIENCE OF THE BAY AREA 23841 3,120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,120.00 101 68010 220 1349 33034 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 37.48 COMMUNICATIONS 37.48 101 65300 160 33035 K.J. WOWS CONSTRUCTION INC 24058 709.68 MISCELLANEOUS 709.68 526 22502 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 33005 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,948.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31948.00 101 68010 220 1644 33006 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 09990 620.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 620.87 730 69593 120 6016 33007 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 612.20 MISC. SUPPLIES 612.20 201 65200 111 33008 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 38.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 38.23 527 66520 120 33009 ALFRED H. ESCOFFIER 15413 1 ,040.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,040.00 101 67500 031 33010 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,768.90 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,768.90 101 65100 220 33011 LINDA HOECK 16390 2,350.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,350.00 101 68010 220 1349 33012 CUMMINS WEST, INC. 16414 102.78 SUPPLIES 102.78 620 15000 33013 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 820.22 COMMUNICATIONS 820.22 101 65100 160 33014 SULLIVAN AND BRAMPTON 18586 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 33015 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 16,081 . 13 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,081 . 13 528 66600 210 33016 PLASTI -PRINT, INC 18794 34.64 MISC. SUPPLIES 34.64 527 66520 120 33017 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 19320 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 33018 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 813.06 MISC. SUPPLIES 504.42 201 65200 111 OFFICE EXPENSE 308.64 621 64450 110 33019 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 38, 130.20 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 38, 130.20 327 81260 210 33020 CLAUDE ARRIOLA 20435 460.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 460.00 101 68010 220 1789 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 05/30/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32993 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATIO 01074 133.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 133.00 527 66520 240 32994 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 87.93 SUPPLIES 87.93 620 15000 32995 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 44.38 MISCELLANEOUS 44.38 201 65200 144 32996 D & M TOWING, INC. 02029 50.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 50.00 620 66700 200 32997 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 1,949.74 MISCELLANEOUS 1,949.74 896 20282 32998 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 224.83 SUPPLIES 224.83 620 15000 32999 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 556.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 21.53 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 149.45 101 68020 190 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 65.08 201 65200 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 59.71 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.26 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 148.75 619 64460 120 5110 33000 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 255,127.60 WATER PURCHASES 255,127.60 526 69020 171 33001 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 136,938.23 MISCELLANEOUS 136,938.23 731 22587 33002 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 837.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 837.00 101 68010 220 1891 33003 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 32.50 OFFICE EXPENSE 32.50 527 66520 110 33004 WFCB OSH COMMERCIAL SERVICES 09670 1,295.88 MISC. SUPPLIES 181.31 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 418.16 101 68020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 133.53 101 68020 130 2100 SMALL TOOLS 13.52 101 66210 130 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.80 101 68020 200 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 62.72 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 360.63 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 38.02 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 42.19 619 64460 120 5240 CITY OF BURLINGAME 05-22-2008 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 15 FUND RECAP 07-08 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 145,642.46 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 1,672.42 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 12,459.83 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 79,989.27 WATER FUND 526 18,277.54 SEWER FUND 527 242,338.70 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 12.63 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 10,073.28 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 47,728.47 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,325.68 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 23,544.63 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 42,571.31 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 503.35 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 5,682.17 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,195.35 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 24,988.46 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 782.56 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $675,788.11 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 32814 THROUGH 32992 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $675,788.11, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../-.. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 14 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32977 HECTOR HERNANDEZ 28482 780.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 780.00 101 65300 260 32978 P. CHRISTOFFERSON 28483 131.00 MISCELLANEOUS 131.00 101 36330 000 1372 32979 HSU HSIAO-CHAN 28484 58.00 MISCELLANEOUS 58.00 101 36330 000 1422 32980 JOHN CONWAY 28485 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1422 32981 JEANNE A AILAND 28486 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1789 32982 MR & MRS WONG 28487 186.00 MISCELLANEOUS 186.00 101 36330 000 1349 32983 KYUNGHEE KIM 28488 428.00 MISCELLANEOUS 428.00 101 36330 000 1646 32984 RICHARD SCHMITT 28489 118.00 MISCELLANEOUS 118.00 101 36330 000 1781 32985 DAWN JURGWITH 28490 35.00 MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 730 39593 000 6016 32986 WEST PORTAL LUTHERAN SCHOOL 28492 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 32987 COLLEGE OF SAN MATEO 28493 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 32988 SIMON JONES 28494 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 32989 CECILIA WARD 28495 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 32990 ALEJANDRO ISLAS 28496 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 32991 MARLINDA'S SKIN & BODY CARE 28497 500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 730 39593 000 6016 32992 NADJYA GHAUSI 28498 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1331 TOTAL $675,788.11 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 13 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32961 CAL LARSEN 28466 26.63 MISCELLANEOUS 26.63 101 36330 000 1644 32962 RAY LUDWELL 28467 26.63 MISCELLANEOUS 26.63 101 36330 000 1644 32963 ROSEMARY MARTIN 28468 59.25 MISCELLANEOUS 59.25 101 36330 000 1644 32964 RICHARD DI TULLIO 28469 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 32965 GERGANA HARALAMPIEVA 28470 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 32966 LAILA LOURIDAS 28471 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 32967 MR & MRS. LEE 28472 186.00 MISCELLANEOUS 186.00 101 36330 000 1349 32968 KAY PHAN 28473 186.00 MISCELLANEOUS 186.00 101 36330 000 1349 32969 LILY ALIZADEH 28474 372.00 MISCELLANEOUS 372.00 101 36330 000 1349 32970 JANET MAMMINI 28475 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 32971 SEYEM ARSLAN 28476 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 32972 KAREN SCIGLIANO 28477 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 32973 FRANCINE ROGG 28478 26.63 MISCELLANEOUS 26.63 101 36330 000 1644 32974 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 28479 248.86 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 248.86 101 64200 150 32975 WINE CONCEPTS 28480 878.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 878.12 730 69593 120 6016 32976 MARCUS MORENO 28481 1,416.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,416.00 101 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME WAR RANT RE G I S T E R PAGE 12 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT °*1 Denotes Hand Written Checks 32945 CDPH-OCP 27933 560.00 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 560.00 526 69020 240 32946 A+SPANISH ACADEMY 27960 910.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 910.00 101 68010 220 1331 32947 R&S ERECTION NORTH PENINSULA 27969 375.63 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 375.63 619 64460 210 5160 32948 VICTORY CONSTRUCTION 27973 2,088.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,088.00 101 22546 32949 DOMINIQUE FLORES 27979 260.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 260.00 101 68010 220 1785 32950 AT&T MOBILITY 28132 195.35 MISCELLANEOUS 195.35 731 22554 32951 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 28171 440.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 196.44 619 64460 120 5260 MISC. SUPPLIES 243.56 619 64460 120 5240 32952 LORRAINE CANTON 28191 34.00 MISCELLANEOUS 34.00 101 36330 000 1660 32953 WILLIAM SPENCER CO 28392 7,560.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 7,560.00 101 22520 32954 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 28401 50.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 50.00 101 68020 200 2100 32955 ABI SERVICES 28421 11,513.93 MISCELLANEOUS 11,513.93 619 64460 804 5120 32956 SALLY CALDWELL 28461 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 32957 LARRY CUTLER 28462 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 32958 TONI HOLMES 28463 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 32959 DANIELLE KELLSTEDT 28464 59.25 MISCELLANEOUS 59.25 101 36330 000 1644 32960 JOAN LANE 28465 26.63 MISCELLANEOUS 26.63 101 36330 000 1644 .JFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 264.93 530 65400. PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 393.03 618 64520 210 TRAINING EXPENSE 276.28 619 64460 260 OFFICE EXPENSE 162.99 621 64450 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 198.00 730 69593 120 6017 MISC. SUPPLIES 822.63 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 450.49 730 69583 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 71 .35 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.05 730 69574 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.26 730 69593 120 6020 LIBRARY EXPENSES 2,000.00 731 22531 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32944 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYST 27931 21,597.15 MISCELLANEOUS 0.01 101 39800 OFFICE EXPENSE 27.05 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 607.15 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 59.92 101 65100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 253.52 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.00 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.35 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 728.63 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 58.84 101 68010 120 1785 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,427.10 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES -171.35 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 106.25 101 68010 120 1781 MISC. SUPPLIES -21.53 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 27.56 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 68.04 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 85.71 101 64400 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 181.49 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.95 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 290.20 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 449.42 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 32.42 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 97.40 101 68010 120 1789 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 354.62 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 1,008.40 101 67500 125 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 437.49 101 67500 129 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 150.00 101 68010 140 1892 COMMUNICATIONS 49.95 101 65100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 20.11 101 66100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 264.94 101 65150 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 173.01 101 68020 200 2100 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,428.74 101 65100 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 759.50 101 68010 220 1422 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -50.00 101 68010 220 1370 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 179.80 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,230.00 101 68010 220 1370 MISCELLANEOUS 216.49 101 67500 235 TRAVEL &MEETINGS 96.64 101 69537 250 TRAVEL &MEETINGS -203.73 101 64150 250 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 147.61 101 64100 250 TRAVEL &MEETINGS 99.00 101 64150 250 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 336.02 101 66100 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,034.30 101 65100 260 PRISONER EXPENSE 63.10 101 65100 291 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 50.00 101 65100 292 MISC. SUPPLIES 137.02 201 65200 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.10 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 245.22 527 66520 120 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 250.00 527 66520 240 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 1,306.06 527 66520 250 MISCELLANEOUS -54.95 530 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 755.57 530 65400 120 C CC CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 32937 PATRICIA KENNELLY 27429 2,480.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,480.00 101 68010 220 1349 32938 PRECISE PRODUCTIONS 27443 275.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 730 69533 220 32939 JP DIGITAL IMAGING 27493 605.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 605.70 730 69593 120 6017 32940 COMCATE 27558 5,911.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,911.00 101 64560 220 32941 KEVIN GARDINER AND ASSOCIATES 27560 3,525.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,525.00 530 65400 210 32942 LOOMIS 27594 2,543.00 BANKING SERVICE FEES 500.00 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,043.00 530 65400 120 32943 SUZANNE MALIK 27718 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1781 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32921 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.22 RENTS&LEASES 153.22 526 69020 180 32922 SAN JOSE BLUE 25886 5,738.41 MISC. SUPPLIES 5,738.41 326 80910 120 32923 JENNIFER BESWICK 25932 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546 32924 VISION INTERNET PROVIDERS INC 26294 200.00 COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 621 64450 160 32925 LUCY DE ANDA 26367 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 32926 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 26420 1,090.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,090.03 101 64200 110 32927 EDWARD R BACON CO 26515 934.20 MISCELLANEOUS 934.20 527 66520 400 32928 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 225.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.49 101 65300 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 164.49 526 69020 110 32929 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 26977 135.06 UTILITY EXPENSE 135.06 896 20281 32930 GLENDA BURKHEAD 26988 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 32931 JONG SOON YEU 27141 26.63 MISCELLANEOUS 26.63 101 36330 000 1644 32932 JANA NISBET 27195 700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781 32933 ADVANCE RECRUITMENT SOLUTIONS 27211 2,065.00 PUBLICATIONS&ADVERTISING 2,065.00 101 64420 150 32934 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF SAN 27283 337.37 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 337.37 625 65213 203 32935 JOHN RODDY 27294 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593 32936 JOY CHUNG 27340 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL . ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 32905 BRIAN WACHHORST 24372 22.00 MISCELLANEOUS - 22.00 101 36330 000 1330 32906 SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER 24408 700.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 700.00 101 65100 292 32907 COMPUCOM 24467 5,895.44 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 5,895.44 621 64450 200 32908 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSO 24605 60.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 60.00 527 66520 260 32909 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 162.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 162.00 101 68010 220 1782 32910 CWEA SFBS 24794 65.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 65.00 527 66520 260 32911 TIM LEUNG 24802 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32912 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 90.12 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.12 201 65200 220 32913 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 302.76 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 302.76 201 65200 200 32914 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 33,052.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 33,052.50 101 64560 210 32915 DANIEL HAAS 25049 700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781 32916 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 752.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 752.00 101 68010 220 1646 32917 KRAMER-WIESE 25250 3,646.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,646.50 101 64420 210 32918 TES 25256 559.06 SUPPLIES 559.06 620 15000 32919 TRICIA HAGEY 25464 49.87 MISCELLANEOUS 49.87 101 36330 000 1644 32920 VALERIE BRUNICARDI 25586 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1422 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32894 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI , INC. 23531 22,859.13 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22,859.13 326 81970 210 32895 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 2,000.00 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 1 ,320.00 526 69020 763 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 680.00 527 66520 763 32896 KEITH MARTIN 23788 99.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 22.34 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.25 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.24 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 13.68 527 66520 130 SMALL TOOLS 13.54 620 66700 130 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 6.35 620 66700 200 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 4.00 620 66700 250 32897 KAREN LIU 23823 156.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 156.75 101 68010 220 1645 32898 MAD SCIENCE OF THE BAY AREA 23841 1 ,072.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,072.00 101 68010 220 1331 32899 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5160 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5150 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5170 32900 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 64.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210 32901 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 32902 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 326.61 MISC. SUPPLIES 70.03 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 87.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 169.58 619 64460 220 5110 32903 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 810.00 MISCELLANEOUS 810.00 526 69020 233 32904 ROBIN MAY 24285 1 ,400.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,400.00 101 68010 220 1781 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32882 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281 32883 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 109.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 109.98 101 65100 120 32884 CARL DEQUANT 22842 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32885 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 10,843.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 10,843.00 618 64520 225 32886 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 991.94 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 465.20 101 65100 200 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 526.74 530 65400 140 32887 RAYMOND FRAYNE 23036 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32888 NANCY OBEDIN 23039 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32889 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 32890 ELIZABETH STARKS 23210 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1422 32891 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 1,711.26 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,711.26 326 80910 210 32892 OFFICE MAX 23306 1,664.60 OFFICE EXPENSE 224.10 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 610.94 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 102.09 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 256.81 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 259.57 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 211.09 621 64450 110 32893 DATASAFE 23410 1,090.68 OFFICE EXPENSE 345.00 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 78.90 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 125.23 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 6.00 101 64150 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 184.55 101 64350 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.00 101 64400 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 303.00 101 64250 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 32868 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 1,678.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 494.00 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 247.00 619 64460 210 5230 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 247.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 690.00 619 64460 210 5110 32869 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 47.62 OFFICE EXPENSE 47.62 621 64450 110 32870 HILLYARD/SAN FRANCISCO 21658 1,005.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,005.33 101 68020 120 2200 32871 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 57.64 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 57.64 101 68020 200 2200 32872 IEDA 21981 3,530.41 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,530.41 101 64420 210 32873 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 31.42 SUPPLIES 31.42 620 15000 32874 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 686.85 SMALL TOOLS 488.02 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 198.83 527 66520 120 32875 DAVID WEDEKING 22262 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32876 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 2,400.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,400.00 101 68010 120 1785 32877 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 200.00 GAS, OIL & GREASE 200.00 101 65100 201 32878 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 23,097.53 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,126.40 736 64572 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,971.13 736 64571 220 32879 CSUS FOUNDATION INC. 22615 102.55 MISCELLANEOUS 102.55 526 69020 233 32880 WEST COAST WILDLANDS 22622 15,150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,150.00 527 66520 220 32881 ANZA ENGINEERING 22634 10,157.89 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,157.89 320 79410 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32853 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 72.33 TRAINING EXPENSE 72.33 527 66520 260 32854 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 255.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 255.20 101 64420 121 32855 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 101.47 BANKING SERVICE FEES 101.47 101 64250 120 32856 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 165.98 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 165.98 625 65213 203 32857 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 550.00 MISCELLANEOUS 550.00 101 22525 32858 DON DORNELL 19617 746.36 MISC. SUPPLIES 746.36 730 69585 120 32859 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,890.93 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,890.93 736 64570 220 32860 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101 32861 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 705.00 COMMUNICATIONS 705.00 621 64450 160 32862 LONGS DRUGS 20453 9.85 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 9.85 101 65100 292 32863 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 3,120.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,120.00 326 75170 210 32864 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 21,858.88 DEPOSIT REFUND 19,304.03 101 22590 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,554.85 530 65400 210 32865 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 199.00 MISCELLANEOUS 199.00 101 64350 031 32866 CHANNING L. BETE CO., INC. 20761 221.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 221.21 730 69584 120 32867 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 781.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 781.00 619 64460 210 5120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32839 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 8,171.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,500.00 101 65100 010 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 26.00 101 68010 011 1372 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 2,412.00 527 66520 011 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 1,233.00 619 64460 011 5280 32840 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 8,075.14 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 545.20 101 64350 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,529.94 618 64520 210 32841 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 101.38 COMMUNICATIONS 32.46 526 69020 160 SMALL TOOLS 68.92 619 64460 130 32842 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 643.66 COMMUNICATIONS 160.00 101 65100 160 TRAINING EXPENSE 483.66 101 65100 260 32843 SUZETTE ODELL 14294 850.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 850.00 730 69544 220 32844 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 69.15 MISC. SUPPLIES 69.15 619 64460 120 5190 32845 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 432.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 432.00 101 64420 121 32846 DAILY JOURNAL CORP. 15626 105.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 105.00 101 64200 150 32847 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,866.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,866.00 101 68010 220 1787 32848 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 21,733.73 SUPPLIES 21,733.73 620 15000 32849 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 48.70 SMALL TOOLS 48.70 620 66700 130 32850 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 2,020.41 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,020.41 527 66520 120 32851 COLORPRINT 17497 291.73 OFFICE EXPENSE 291.73 527 66520 110 32852 SHAW PIPELINE INC 17959 46,560.47 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,560.47 326 80910 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32826 AT&T 03080 443.45 COMMUNICATIONS 76.73 101 65100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 154.22 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 212.50 896 20281 32827 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,260.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,260.00 101 68010 220 1646 32828 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,737.42 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,737.42 101 65150 220 32829 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 12,093.76 MISCELLANEOUS 12,093.76 526 22502 32830 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 4,514.04 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,514.04 101 68020 220 2300 32831 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 480.39 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 480.39 101 64350 210 32832 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 2,424.80 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 2,424.80 526 69020 803 32833 POM INC. 09248 458.14 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 458.14 530 65400 200 32834 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 2,482.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 215.00 101 65100 291 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 2,267.00 101 65100 292 32835 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 507.13 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 507.13 101 68020 190 2200 32836 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 28,962.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,462.50 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 27,500.00 618 64520 601 32837 GARY M. OLSON, PH.D. 09902 300.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 300.00 101 64420 121 32838 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 05/22/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32814 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,672.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.23 101 68020 120 2300 GAS, OIL & GREASE 117.56 201 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 246.42 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 68.33 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.63 528 66600 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.51 619 64460 120 5130 SUPPLIES 1,147.83 620 15000 32815 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 35,349.17 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 35,349.17 621 64450 220 32816 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 219.21 SMALL TOOLS 81.19 201 65200 130 TRAINING EXPENSE 138.02 201 65200 260 32817 VEOLIA WATER 02110 218,616.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 218,616.00 527 66530 220 32818 GENE EVANS 02149 176.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 176.25 101 68010 220 1644 32819 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 264.11 MISC. SUPPLIES 189.55 101 68020 120 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 74.56 101 68020 192 2200 32820 FEDEX 02160 389.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.86 101 64400 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 122.46 101 65300 120 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 247.06 101 64420 121 32821 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 235.57 SMALL TOOLS 71.89 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 163.68 619 64460 120 32822 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 924.84 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 726.96 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 197.88 101 66210 226 32823 CHARLES J. HAPP 02360 600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781 32824 HEWLETT PACKARD 02457 2,301.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,301.94 320 80430 120 32825 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 240.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 240.32 101 64100 120 V l } CITY OF BURLINGAME 05-16-2008 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 07-08 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 127,534.85 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 4,666.60 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 9,095.85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 6,767.49 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 651.00 WATER FUND 526 2,251.80 SEWER FUND 527 46,069.20 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 6,689.36 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,203.34 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 18,598.38 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 804.33 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 6,470.67 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 207.89 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,266.87 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 3,139.64 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $235,417.27 i�14q -> voi D 3 -2-To-7 -N o -> Vo I D HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 32637 THROUGH 32771 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $235,417.27, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WAR RANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT • Denotes Hand Written Checks 32765 DEVINCENZI METAL PRODUCTS 28453 97.43 SMALL TOOLS 97.43 526 69020 130 32766 CREATIVE EYE 28454 376.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 376.50 201 65200 260 32767 ASSOCIATED SIGNS 28455 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 32768 JACK TIEN 28456 4,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 4,000.00 101 22520 32769 LPCH-CNE 28457 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 731 22554 32770 CAINE COMPUTER CONSULTING 28458 1,910.40 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,910.40 101 65100 210 32771 ROBERT BARISONE 28459 1,607.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,607.00 130 20016 TOTAL $235,417.27 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT J*1 Denotes Hand Written Checks 32752 AT&T MOBILITY 27758 32.67 COMMUNICATIONS 32.67 101 65100 160 32753 VMI INC 27929 6, 116.71 MISCELLANEOUS 6, 116.71 621 64450 400 32754 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYST 27931 4,424.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 17.51 201 65200 111 SUPPLIES 580.64 201 65200 112 MISC. SUPPLIES 252.46 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 889. 17 201 65200 130 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 570.00 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 115.49 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 255.23 201 65200 203 TRAINING EXPENSE 1 ,604.29 201 65200 260 MISCELLANEOUS 139.64 731 22554 32755 SANDRA ETCHELL CONSULTING SERVIC 27970 6,476.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,476.00 320 79410 210 32756 VICTORY CONSTRUCTION 27973 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 32757 CHRISTOPHER CADWALLADER 28152 360.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 360.00 101 68010 220 1349 32758 TONY LEUNG 28215 9,875.00 MISCELLANEOUS 9,875.00 101 22546 32759 RICKY CIRIMELE 28284 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 130 20016 32760 JOE BUNNELL 28287 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 130 20016 32761 ROBERT KELLY 28292 183.00 MISCELLANEOUS 183.00 130 20016 32762 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTM 28432 250.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 250.00 201 65200 260 32763 SEYMON GERBER 28451 1 ,200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,200.00 101 22546 32764 FOSTER & FREEMAN USA INC 28452 85.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 85.00 101 65100 292 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32736 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 121.24 MISC. SUPPLIES 121.24 101 65100 120 32737 LANCE BAYER 26156 412.50 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 412.50 101 64350 210 32738 DANCE FORCE 26351 5,280.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,280.00 101 68010 220 1646 32739 WILKINSON CONSTRUCTION 26485 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 32740 PETER TOKARSKI 26788 205.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 205.00 130 20060 32741 AMERICAN MESSAGING 26822 66.36 COMMUNICATIONS 66.36 526 69020 160 32742 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 104.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 104.45 101 65300 120 32743 UTILITY INSIGHT INC. 26895 646.26 MISC. SUPPLIES 646.26 527 66520 120 32744 SAN FRANCISCO FENCERS CLUB 27032 294.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294.40 101 68010 220 1762 32745 MICHAEL GONG 27171 8,512.50 MISCELLANEOUS 8,512.50 101 22546 32746 NCBPA 27179 29.00 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 29.00 526 69020 240 32747 TOM LOGAN 27350 3,175.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,175.00 101 68010 220 1644 32748 STEVE BESOZZI 27371 135.00 MISCELLANEOUS 135.00 130 20016 32749 SABRO COMMUNICATIONS INC 27532 194.00 COMMUNICATIONS 194.00 101 65300 160 32750 EPC CONSULTANTS 27676 520.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.00 327 81800 220 32751 AT&T MOBILITY 27715 78.81 COMMUNICATIONS 78.81 101 65300 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 32720 KEN GIACOTTO 24642 382.00 MISCELLANEOUS 382.00 130 20016 32721 TOM DONNELLY 24830 832.00 MISCELLANEOUS 832.00 130 20016 32722 RYAN KLARICH 24868 678.90 MISC. SUPPLIES 678.90 730 69585 120 32723 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 51.74 TRAINING EXPENSE 51.74 527 66520 260 32724 LAURA MARSH 24964 183.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 183.75 101 68010 220 1646 32725 JAMES MURPHY 25080 1,008.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,008.00 101 68010 220 1661 32726 DALE ROYAL 25082 33.60 MISCELLANEOUS 33.60 130 20016 32727 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 26.01 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.01 101 64200 110 32728 MICHAEL VONADA 25235 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 32729 JAKE PELK 25236 498.00 MISCELLANEOUS 498.00 130 20016 32730 MERCY MARTIN 25270 971.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 971.00 101 68010 220 1661 32731 PAUL O-NEILL 25300 218.00 MISCELLANEOUS 218.00 130 20016 32732 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 173.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.00 527 66520 190 32733 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 132.91 TRAINING EXPENSE 132.91 101 68020 260 2100 32734 ED BARTON 25850 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 32735 KEVIN REYES 25970 390.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 390.00 101 68010 220 1789 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32705 OFFICE MAX 23306 575.44 OFFICE EXPENSE 180.13 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 318.49 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 76.82 101 64400 110 32706 SAN FRANCISCO EXAMINER 23366 961.74 MISCELLANEOUS 961.74 101 30710 32707 BART GAUL 23603 2,800.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,800.00 101 22520 32708 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 841.42 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 841.42 526 69020 803 32709 AT&T/MCI 23728 28.96 COMMUNICATIONS 28.96 621 64450 160 32710 DAVE CREAMER 23876 1,134.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,134.00 101 68010 220 1644 32711 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 17,289.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,289.00 619 64460 220 5120 32712 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 281.66 COMMUNICATIONS 281.66 101 68020 160 2300 32713 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 110.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 110.00 620 66700 200 32714 CHRISTINE REED 24153 98.00 MISCELLANEOUS 98.00 130 20016 32715 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 1,763.49 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,763.49 101 64250 110 32716 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 157.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50 101 68010 220 1644 32717 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 729.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 729.00 101 68010 220 1661 32718 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 1,092.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,092.00 101 68010 220 1661 32719 BURLINGAME ROTARY 24566 360.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 360.00 101 64150 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 32690 S.B.R.P.S.T.C. 20835 2,201.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,201.00 101 65100 260 32691 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 2,220.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,220.00 101 68010 220 1331 32692 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 1,982.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,593.79 101 66210 120 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 388.72 101 66210 219 32693 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 943.60 DEPOSIT REFUND 943.60 101 22590 32694 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 51.73 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.73 527 66520 120 32695 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 5,319.58 MISCELLANEOUS 5,319.58 101 37010 32696 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 207.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 207.21 101 68010 120 1781 32697 VS GOLF LLC 21948 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1784 32698 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 39.92 SUPPLIES 39.92 620 15000 32699 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 3,847.18 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 715.79 526 69020 803 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,131.39 527 66520 120 32700 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 200.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 200.00 620 66700 210 32701 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 160.00 MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 526 69020 233 32702 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 164.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 164.50 101 68010 220 1645 32703 PITNEY BOWES INC 22878 325.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 325.00 621 64450 200 32704 CALIFORNIA SPECIALIZED TRAINING 23220 1,950.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,950.00 201 65500 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,544.69 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 274.73 101 66210 140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303.49 201 65200 220 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 335.37 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 274.70 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 35.48 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 94.48 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 226.44 620 66700 140 32677 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 1,485.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,350.00 101 64350 210 TRAINING EXPENSE 135.00 101 64420 260 32678 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 19320 600.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 600.00 101 22520 32679 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 207.89 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 207.89 625 65213 203 32680 JOHN CAHALAN, ASLA 19561 291.49 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 291.49 320 81790 220 32681 DON DORNELL 19617 501.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 501.87 730 69585 120 32682 MONICA OLSEN 19832 345.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 345.60 101 68010 220 1661 32683 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 131.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 131.00 327 81800 120 32684 INTRALINE INC 20097 277.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 277.32 619 64460 120 5240 32685 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER 20300 450.15 MISC. SUPPLIES 450.15 101 68020 120 2200 32686 RACQUET SMITH 20339 2,304.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,304.00 101 68010 220 1782 32687 CLAUDE ARRIOLA 20435 450.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 101 68010 220 1789 32688 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 427.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 427.00 527 66520 240 32689 JEFF DOWD 20779 256.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 256.50 101 68010 220 1785 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32663 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 162.38 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 162.38 101 68020 190 2200 32664 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,768.90 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,768.90 101 65100 220 32665 DAILY JOURNAL CORP. 15626 48.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 48.00 101 64200 150 32666 TIM OLENO 15629 120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1788 32667 PENINSULA ASA 15701 585.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 585.00 101 68010 120 1787 32668 TEAM CLEAN 15827 275.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 201 65200 220 32669 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 766.96 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 766.96 101 68020 140 2100 32670 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 6.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.43 526 69020 120 32671 NILMEYER NILMEYER ASSOCIATES 17587 2,125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,125.00 101 22515 32672 TOOLS EXPRESS 18027 537.25 TRAINING EXPENSE 537.25 101 68020 260 2100 32673 BORDEN DECAL CO 18836 1,203.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,203.34 530 65400 120 32674 BAY ALARM 18854 207.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 69.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 138.00 619 64460 210 5110 32675 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 71.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 71.00 101 66100 240 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32651 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 605.44 MISC. SUPPLIES 605.44 101 68020 120 2200 32652 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 200.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 200.00 101 68010 120 1521 32653 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 1 ,750.20 SMALL TOOLS 507.69 101 68020 130 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 108.45 101 68020 200 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 560.44 101 68020 200 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 238. 10 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 335.52 528 66600 120 32654 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 1 ,903.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,903.50 101 68010 220 1661 32655 WFCB OSH COMMERCIAL SERVICES 09670 123.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 9.73 101 65100 120 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 82.80 101 65100 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 30.93 201 65200 111 32656 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 5,692.55 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 4,730.48 101 66210 222 TRAINING EXPENSE 891 .71 101 68020 260 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 70.36 528 66600 120 32657 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 09990 86. 10 MISC. SUPPLIES 86. 10 730 69593 120 6016 32658 CAL-STEAM 10557 1 ,001 .50 MISC. SUPPLIES 362.64 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 311 .99 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 288.40 619 64460 120 5130 SUPPLIES 38.47 620 15000 32659 PIP PRINTING 10620 602.09 TRAINING EXPENSE 602.09 201 65500 260 32660 J .D. CESARE 11135 170.00 MISCELLANEOUS 170.00 101 36310 32661 CAMINO REAL PET CLINIC 11577 118.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 118.50 101 65100 120 32662 COAST OIL CO. 13818 30,703.92 GAS, OIL & GREASE 30,703.92 101 65100 201 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 05/16/08 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 32637 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 104.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.50 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.53 101 68020 110 2100 32638 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 55.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 55.00 101 68020 120 2100 32639 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 528.47 MISCELLANEOUS 448.15 201 65200 144 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 80.32 201 65200 203 32640 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 470.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 442.18 619 64460 120 SMALL TOOLS 28.57 620 66700 130 32641 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 852.48 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 473.60 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 378.88 101 66210 226 32642 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 182.95 OFFICE EXPENSE 182.95 101 65100 110 32643 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 160.93 SUPPLIES 160.93 620 15000 32644 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 132.07 MISC. SUPPLIES 132.07 101 68020 120 2200 32645 P. G. & E. 03054 1,662.08 GAS & ELECTRIC 1,395.37 101 68010 170 1286 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 101 66100 170 GAS & ELECTRIC 256.48 201 65200 170 32646 CITY OF SAN BRUNO 03340 1,050.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,050.00 101 66210 222 32647 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 6,248.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 6,248.00 528 66600 120 32648 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 40,638.75 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 40,638.75 527 66530 270 32649 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 6,118.72 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,118.72 101 68020 220 2300 32650 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 400.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 101 65100 260 BENE - JUN - 5 2008 JEFFREY AND JUNE KAUFMAN 114 CLERK'S OFFICE 1760 ESCALANTE WAY C 1V10F SURLMAMF BURLINGAME, CA 94010 (650) 692-0505 FAX (650) 692-1087 Email: kaufmanii u.vahoo.com Fi':,dna'r',,able Mayor and City Council : June 4, 2008 Please schedule an appeal hearing for 1790 Escalante Way to be heard at the Burlingame City Council July 21 , 2008 Council meeting . City of Burlingame City Clerk 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 RE: Appeal of the Planning Commissions motion to approve 1790 Escalante Way Application Dear City Council Members: My name is Jeffrey Kaufman and I have lived at 1760 Escalante Way, Burlingame, CA 94010 for over 30 years. I also had my CPA practice in Burlingame. My wife June and I live next door to 1790 Escalante Way where they intend to build a new basement, a first story addition and a second story addition. The owners of the property purchased it approximately one year ago and to this date have not occupied it. The first story addition will affect our view toward the bay. At present we have a filtered view through some beautiful trees of the bay on a clear day and the room is where I do my exercise on a treadmill. The proposed addition will not only block part of our view, but will be an eye sore. The proposed addition is also going to the limit of the allowed setback of 7' from our fence, which makes the obstruction that much more prevalent. 1790 Escalante Way property has virtually no parking around it, since it is the middle house in the circular cold-a-sac. We are concerned that access to our garage will be impacted by the vehicles servicing the construction. We are also concerned of possible water, drainage and erosion affecting our property. On May 12, 2008, the planning commission first suggested the roofline of the addition be brought down by 12 to 18 inches and the motion failed. Then a motion was passed directing the applicant to reduce height of the roofline by a minimum of 18-inches, with 24-inches preferred. The Architect lowered the Story Polls by 16-inches which was not incompliance with the Planning Commissions directive and then submitted revised plans reflecting a reduction of only 16-inches. We feel that 16-inches is not enough of a reduction and would like to see how it would look with a reduction of 24-inches. There is a difference when looking through the Story Polls and having a building in front of you. We commend the work of the Planning Commission and appreciate their coming to our house and seeing for themselves the impact of the project.We appreciate their support during the process,but do not agree with their conclusion. We humbly request your review of the project and its impact on us and the homes around it and hopefully you will agree with our concerns and approve our appeal. I have enclosed copies of the pertinent sections of the minutes of the Planning Commissions meetings of May 12, 2008 and May 27, 2008. Also enclosed is my check#1606 in the amount of $280.00 the required fee for filing an appeal. Sincerely, Jeffrey Kaufman CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Approved Minutes May 12,2008 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; 9. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable"best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 11. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners,set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s)based on the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans;this survey shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional,shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,such as window locations and bays,are built as shown on the approved plans;architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials,window type, etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: • Commissioner Brownrigg noted that he would vote against the motion; the Colonial style of architecture is too massive on this street. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-1-1(Commissioner Brownrigg dissenting, Commissioner Auran recused). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:47 p.m. Commissioner Auran returned to the dais. City Attorney Anderson returned to the Chambers. 4. 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT,PARKING VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ANEW BASEMENT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JOHN C. LEE, 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Approved Minutes May 12, 2008 APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVID ZHANG, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 28. 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) Reference staff report dated May 12, 2008,with attachments. Senior Planner Brooks presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. John Lee, 711 San Miguel Lane, Foster City; represented the applicant. • Visited 1760 Escalante and saw that the ridge is below eye level, and view requires a sharp angle and is blocked by trees. Commission comments: • Concern regarding integration of roofline of addition and clipped off corners of library addition; doesn't fit with architecture of property, or neighborhood;these concerns haven't been addressed in the revised plans. • Library addition protrudes into the neighbor's distant view; could the roof be at a lesser pitch to reduce view impacts; consider changing roof pitch on addition to 3:12 pitch. • Bringing ridgeline down is difference between approving and denying the project. Public comments: • Dana Wemple, 3130 Atwater Drive and Jeff Kaufman, 1760 Escalante Way; concerns about trees impacts on property at3130 Atwater Drive have been relieved somewhat; remaining concern is that excavation for basement is limited to only where the story poles are located; encouraged bringing down the ridgeline will reduce view impacts. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: • Could be comfortable with a reduction in the height of the addition. Commissioner Terrones moved to approve the application by resolution, with the conditions included in the staff report, and the additional condition that the ridgeline of the roof of the addition be brought down by 12 to 18-inches. Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion by Commission Brownrigg to continue the matter with direction to the applicant to reduce height of roofline by a minimum of 18-inches, 24-inches preferred, and install story poles to reflect the revised height of the ridgeline. The item may be placed on the Consent Calendar when it returns to the Commission. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: • Commissioner Vistica noted that he can't support the motion because there are more fundamental problems with the project design. 6 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 3b. 1226 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED R-3 —APPLICATION FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (1226 EL CAMINO LLC, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND KIRK MILLER AFFILIATES, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN (continued from April 94, 2008 Planning Commission meeting) a. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Condominium Permit, and Parking Variance b. Tentative Condominium Map and Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Combination 3c. 1425 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1 , SUBAREA A — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT TO CHANGE THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (LAURA LEFF, APPLICANT; AND GREGORY J. GORMEY, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN 3d. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22, THE SIGN CODE, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE, AMEND HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR, C-1 AND C-2 DISTRICTS, AND CORRECT A REFERENCE REGARDING WALL SIGN AREA. PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Commissioner Brownrigg moved approval of Items 3b, 3c and 3d on the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports, with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner A uran. Vice- Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi absent). VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 3a. 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, PARKING VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FORA NEW BASEMENT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JOHN C. LEE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVID ZHANG, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (continued from April 28, 2008 and May 12, 2008 Planning Commission meetings) Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. John Lee, project architect, 711 San Miguel Lane, Foster City; presented the project. Commission comments: ■ Discussed roof pitch. Public comments: 3 CIN OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Unapproved Minutes May 27,2008 • Jeffrey and June Kaufman, 1760 Escalante Way; still concerned that view will continued to be impacted by the blocky appearance of the addition. Architect noted that the ridgeline was lowered 16-inches;but Commission wanted it reduced by 18-to 24-inches;could further reduce the impacts. Commission comments: • Is a good effort;an improvement in the design addressing the Kaufman's concerns. • No Variances are being requested. • The design is a reasonable compromise to address view concerns. Commissioner Brownrigg moved to approve the application by resolution,with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3, and date stamped March 28,2008,sheets Al,A2,A6 and A7,and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes,footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007 and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo,the Fire Marshal's September 24,2007 and October 22,2007,memos,and the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007,memo shall be met; 3. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition,the debris box shall be placed within the driveway of the subject property; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors,or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project,the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission,or City Council on appeal;which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission,or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: • The new basement is an effort on the applicant's part to move the additional floorarea below grade. • The reduction in the pitch of the porch roof is the maximum that could be achieved. • Uncertain if the space could still be useable with further reductions in plate heights and roof pitch. • Majority of the addition impacts views of trees. • Commissioner Vistica feels the design is fundamentally flawed; doesn't keep with the existing vocabulary of the house; will not support. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-1-1 (CommissionerVistica dissenting, Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m. 4. 466 MARIN DRIVE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO, FRONT SETBACK AND PARKING FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE, GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND STEVE DRUSKIN, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMElER (continued from April 28 2008 Planning Commission Meeting) Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES � 1MONLa:11 City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California May 27, 2008 - 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Vice-Chair Terrones called the May 27, 2008, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Lindstrom, Terrones, Vistica and Yie Absent: Commissioner Cauchi Staff Present: Community Development Director, William Meeker and Planner, Ruben Hurin III. MINUTES Commissioner A uran moved, seconded by Commissioner Brownrigg to approve the minutes ofthe May 12, 2008 regular meeting of the Planning Commission, with the following change: • Page 6, bottom of page; delete `Appeal procedures were advised". Motion passed 6-0-1(Commissioner Cauchi absent). IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; referenced the Peninsula Hospital study item(Agenda Item 2). Requested that the Commission ask for the following information: a business plan and types of services that will be provided in the professional office building. The application does not specify what the use of the additional floor will be. Currently, if a bed is not available at the hospital, it is because someone hasn't been able to be moved to a skilled care facility. Skilled nursing that was planned to be at the hospital is being moved to 1720 Trousdale (Magnolia Gardens). The helipad may well not be built due to lack of funds. The Commission should insist that the helipad be built. The additional floor will not be set back as far from the neighbors as far as originally planned. Space could be rented out to persons not practicing at the hospital. VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1219 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISHMENT(DES ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND DAVID ARMANINO, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER ERICA STROHMEIER Planner Hurin presented a summary of the staff report, dated May 27, 2008. 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 Commission comments: • Include discussion in staff report of City Council's desire a few years ago to allow additional restaurants on Broadway; use this information to support request. • Be cognizant of design of fire sprinkler requirements, especially if at front of property. • Would be a good addition to Broadway. This item was set for the regular Consent Calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:14 p.m. 2. 1783 EL CAMINO REALM 501 TROUSDALE DRIVE, ZONED UNCLASSIFIED — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INCREASE THE FLOOR AREA OF THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING FOR THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT (MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES, APPLICANT; PENINSULA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER; AND ANSHEN + ALLEN, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Community Development Director Meeker presented a summary of the staff report, dated May 28, 2008. Commission comments: • Application well done, but would like the following items addressed: provide a business plan, uses for the expanded building, and whether or not the helipad will be built. • Would like to see an original site plan to compare to new site plan. • Section through the helipad area should be provided. • With respect to Huebner letter, what is the plan for parking management post-construction? • Adding primary healthcare jobs is good for Burlingame. • The building's vocabulary was balanced in thirds; would like to see if there is a means of restoring the balance in the design; something to give the middle third of the building increased weight to balance the top. • Attendant parking is discussed as a potential solution to parking issues post-construction; plan and give thought ahead of time if valet parking is to be provided as part of the plan. • Review the key conditions that are outstanding with a status report; particularly with respect to the public art piece. This item was set for the regularAction Calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:22 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar- Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Vice-Chair Terrones asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. Jeffrey Kaufman, 1760 Escalante Way, requested that Item 3a(1790 Escalante Way)be removed from Consent Calendar for discussion. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 3b. 1226 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED R-3 —APPLICATION FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT(1226 EL CAMINO LLC,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;AND KIRK MILLER AFFILIATES,ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN (continued from April 14, 2008 Planning Commission meeting) a. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Condominium Permit, and Parking Variance b. Tentative Condominium Map and Tentative and Final Parcel Map for Lot Combination 3c. 1425 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A—APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA FOOD ESTABLISHMENT TO CHANGE THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (LAURA LEFF, APPLICANT; AND GREGORY J. GORMEY, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER RUBEN HURIN 3d. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 22,THE SIGN CODE, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN POLE SIGNS IN THE SL DISTRICT FROM COMPLIANCE,AMEND HEIGHTS ALLOWED FOR MONUMENT SIGNS IN THE RR, C-1 AND C-2 DISTRICTS,AND CORRECT REFERENCE REGARDING WALL SIGN AREA. PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Commissioner Brownrigg moved approval of Items 3b, 3c and 3d on the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports, with recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by CommissionerAuran. Vice- Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi absent). VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 3a. 1790 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, PARKING VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FORA NEW BASEMENT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JOHN C. LEE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVID ZHANG, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (continued from April 28, 2008 and May 12, 2008 Planning Commission meetings) Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. John Lee, project architect, 711 San Miguel Lane, Foster City; presented the project. Commission comments: • Discussed roof pitch. Public comments: Jeffrey and June Kaufman, 1760 Escalante Way; still concerned that view will continued to be impacted by the blocky appearance of the addition. Architect noted that the ridgeline was lowered �" 16-inches; but Commission wanted it reduced by 18-to 24-inches;could further reduce the impacts. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 Commission comments: • Is a good effort; an improvement in the design addressing the Kaufman's concerns. • No Variances are being requested. • The design is a reasonable compromise to address view concerns. Commissioner Brownrigg moved to approve the application by resolution, with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 15, 2008, sheet A4 and A5, date stamped April 16, 2008, sheet A3, and date stamped March 28, 2008, sheets Al, A2, A6 and A7, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 20, 2007, October 18, 2007 and January 31, 2008 memos, the City Engineer's September 24, 2007 memo, the Fire Marshal's September 24, 2007 and October 22, 2007, memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 24, 2007, memo shall be met; 3. that during demolition and construction of the proposed addition, the debris box shall be placed within the driveway of the subject property; 4. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; - 5. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 10. that priorto scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, oranother architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and 12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: • The new basement is an effort on the applicant's part to move the additional floor area belowgrade. The reduction in the pitch of the porch roof is the maximum that could be achieved. Uncertain if the space could still be useable with further reductions in plate heights and roof pitch. • Majority of the addition impacts views of trees. • Commissioner Vistica feels the design is fundamentally flawed; doesn't keep with the existing vocabulary of the house; will not support. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-1-1 (CommissionerVistica dissenting, Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m. 4. 466 MARIN DRIVE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO, FRONT SETBACK AND PARKING FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TOA SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE, GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND STEVE DRUSKIN, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (continued from April 28, 2008 Planning Commission Meeting) Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue and Steve Druskin, 466 Marin Drive; represented the applicant. Disagree with staffs interpretation of FAR issue; don't wish to request the Variance; will commit to the current design. Designed a room to be a workable space; and needed to work with roofline to 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 make it more pleasing; incorporated the dormers. Area above foyer contributes 27 square feet to the overage on FAR; not accessible from any area. Commission comments: • Appreciate design presented by applicant. • What will area below dormer be used for, storage (applicant:was designed so it would not be used as finished area); why not pull with dormer in further(applicant: this was the approach selected to provide adequate sized windows that work with the design, did it to not have it applied to the FAR); seems like wasted space; if the Variance is approved, wouldn't it make sense to increase the floor area of the room. • There isn't a hardship for the Variance; not supported by the facts. • Need for Variance is necessitated by the need to make the design for the building work; sets a dangerous precedent. • Disappointed that architect hasn't come back with a design without the need for the Variance,given the Commission's prior direction; advised architect to advise his client to allow a design that eliminates the Variance. • There should be a way to reduce the square footage without a significant impact upon the usability of the home. Public comments: • The project architect asked if the Commission could consider eliminating the foyer area from the FAR calculation? Asked for Commission direction on whether this would be allowed. —. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: • The applicant is being penalized relative to FAR, due to the existence of an attached garage; the change to the porch enhances the design. • Perhaps a discussion should occur related to changing the rules relative to detached versus attached garages. • Have been sympathetic to granting FAR Variance in instances where it is a close call; but 122 square feet is not a close call. • There may be support for exempting the foyer ceiling height from the FAR calculation. • Front setback Variance could be eliminated by relocating the posts on the porch. • It is necessary for porch to encroach a bit into the setback to make it more usable; there may be a reason for granting that Variance. Commissioner Brownrigg moved to deny the application without prejudice. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: • The dormer was a solution to some challenges encountered by the applicant, now there is an opportunity to refine the design. 6 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 Vice-Chair Terrones called fora voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed 6- 0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:02 p.m. 5. 1221 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR CHANGES TO AN APPROVED PROJECT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A BASEMENTAND DETACHED GARAGE(BRETAND SUZANNE BOTTARINI,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS: MARK ROBERTSON DESIGNER) PROJECT PLANNER RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008,with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Seventeen (17) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Brett Bottarini, 1221 Cabrillo Avenue and Mark Robertson 918 East Grant Place, San Mateo; represented the applicant. • Through the process of framing, the design of the windows was revised. • True divided light windows are problematic when used in the Prairie-style windows. Commission comments: • The changes look fine, but why did they occur? Just want to be educated on why this type of change continues to occur. The scale of the plans (compressed plans with multiple floors on one page) could have lead to property owner not truly understanding the design of the windows. Public comments: • Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; this an experienced architect and an owner that built the home next door 2 years earlier; should have known to submit changes prior to implementing them. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 2, 2008, sheets 4 and 5 and date stamped February 16, 2007, sheets 1-3 and 6,with a maximum space between the first and second floor of thirteen (13) inches, maximum second floor plate height of F-1",and a reduction in overall building height of at least 3 inches, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the sump pump shall be located in an enclosed mechanical room in the basement and it shall be soundproof so that the noise from the pump will not exceed 5 dBA at any property line of the site; 3. that one, 15-gallon street tree shall be planted by the Parks Department in the planter strip in front of the property; the species and location may be chosen by the property owner from the street tree list for trees located under power lines; CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 4, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's January 11, 2007memo,the Fire Marshal's December 5,2006 memo,and the NPDES Coordinator's December 5, 2006 memo shall be met; 5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 7. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 8. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 9. that priorto scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer,or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. '1 10. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 12. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 13. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 14. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 15. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 8 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 16. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 17. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: • None Vice-Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0- 1(Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:13 p.m. 6. 750 WALNUT AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR CHANGES TOA PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE (JAJE DU AND FATALI RUSLI, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND A.S.I. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGNER) PROJECT PLANNER LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated May 27, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Commission comments: • The Commission feels the loss of Commissioner Osterling's skills with respect to landscape design. Insist that any species that will grow larger than 10-feet within 5-years should be called out on project plans. Jaje Du, 750 Walnut Avenue; represented the applicant. • Agrees with suggestions from design reviewer. • Removed approximately 430 square feet of paving. • Can remove louver above the garage, if desired. Additional Commission comments: • Asked what occurs behind the wall where the louver above the garage has been installed; perhaps a window may be more appropriate, depending upon what is behind the gable of the garage. Was possibility of adding windows to garage door discussed with design reviewer(applicant:design reviewer didn't think it would improve the design). Concerned with the amount of impervious paving proposed at the front of the site, could pavers set in sand be installed instead (applicant: could add pavers set in sand along the driveway borders and banding within the driveway area). CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 • Appreciates effort to reduce the amount of paving; works a lot better. On area in front of the "Fortnight Lilies"on the landscape plan; is there any more paving that could be removed in the area (applicant: would like to have an area to get the afternoon sun). Concerned that the area may feel that you are sitting in front of the garage area; use some type of sand-set pavers in this area to help define area as not being a part of the driveway. • Seems like all the effort to approve the project has been thrown out by the applicant; hard to support and have a negotiation for minor changes to improve the appearance of the revised project. • Not happy with changes; they have been made without real thought being given to the impact on the design. • With changes suggested by design reviewer, is as good as it will get under the circumstances. Public comments: • None There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Further Commission comments: • Not happy with changes that have been made. Commissioner Brownrigg moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 10, 2004, sheets A6 and L-1, February 29, 2008, sheets Al through A3, March 28, 2008, sheets A4 and A5, and March 31, 2008, landscape plan, and that all windows shall be divided light aluminum clad wood windows, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the material of the new proposed vent in the gable end of the garage will be wood; 3. that sand-set pavers shall be installed for the patio area at the front of the house near the"Fortnight Lilies", along the driveway border and for the banding within the driveway area; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first, or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 5. that the conditions of the City Engineer, Recycling Specialist, Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal's memos dated May 17, 2004, shall be met; 6. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 7. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint, 10 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 8. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 9. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 12. that the owner is responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures detailed in the Arborist's Report date stamped June 13, 2002; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance 9;and that no exterior light fixture shall produce a cone of light that extends beyond the property boundaries; and 15. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: With changes suggested by design reviewer, is as good as it will get under the circumstances. • Asked that paving be modified with sand-set pavers in area near"Fortnight Lilies': • Not certain if a window in place of the louver over the garage would be appropriate given non- useable space behind the gable. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 4-2-1 (Commissioners Auran and Vistica dissenting, Commissioner Cauchi absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:37 p.m. 11 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 7. 1837 HUNT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TOA SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (BACILIA MACIAS, SPATIAL ART, INC.,APPLICANTAND DESIGNER; AND CHRIS DUNNING PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated May 28, 2008,with attachments. Planner Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Commission comments: • None Bacilia Macias and Melanie Heck, 5141 Hilltop Drive, EI Sobrante; represented the applicant. • Described changes made to plans. Additional Commission comments: • Visited uphill neighbor and observed that views are reasonably protected, but concerned about privacy of neighbor;would suggest that windows on right elevation near stairwell be clerestory/glass block to preserve neighbor's privacy, also could install skylights for added light. • Suggested that only two lights be provided on the deck; remove the two outermost lights. —. • Consider bringing in the upper balcony by a few feet on both sides to bring it further away from the neighbors. • Location of the addition is well considered; but some concern about view blockage from neighbor's kitchen; why wasn't a split-level considered (applicant: there are many trees that a good lawn area that the homeowner wishes to retain for children's play area). • Asked about the size of some of the rooms on the second-floor, particularly the master bedroom with its 21-foot depth blocks the kitchen view; could be pulled back a few feet to reduce view impacts. • Concerns regarding the deck off of the master bedroom creating more outdoor living space that will impact the neighbor; consider eliminating the front deck or bringing the balcony by a few feet on both sides to bring it further away from the neighbors. • Like the idea of minimizing the impact of the deck rails, but feels an ornamental treatment for the rear deck may be more appropriate than what is shown on the plan. • Concern regarding the construction details of the balcony; would be tough to build; determine if it is feasible before construction. • Roof overhang at second floor on left side elevation; appears to be hipped back; go ahead and let it engage the roof directly, without using a hip design. • Detail on Sheet A5, fascia dimension needs to be clarified; suggest a smaller size fascia. Public comments: • James Vlahos, 50 Platt Avenue, Sausalito; Theodore Vlahos, 1847 Hunt Drive; and Chris Dunning, 1837 Hunt Drive spoke; presented a letterto the Commission; concerned about mass and bulk and propensity for increasing the home size of all homes on the block; encouraged by comments regarding minimizing the mass of the proposed addition in order to preserve views. The existing 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 house is too small to accommodate the applicant's family; pushing the addition further back would detract from the usability of the yard; designers will take into account the suggestions made at this evening's hearing. Next door neighbor on downhill side, has a two-story house;there is a precedent for two-story homes in the area. Further Commission comments: • Asked if the applicant realized that the entire house, with the exception of the garage, will be completely demolished to achieve the changes. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Vistica moved to continue the application with direction to the applicant, as outlined in the discussion. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Discussion of motion: • Asked for uphill neighbor's contact telephone numbers for Commission to make arrangements for site visit. • The second floor plan appears to be very inefficient; there could be a better design; though the addition is relatively modest; doesn't significantly impact views. Also look at any possibilities to move mass of second story addition away from neighbor. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to continue. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Cauchi absent). This item concluded at 9:14 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS Commissioner Auran recused himself due to a business relationship with the applicant for Item 8 (1317 Cabrillo Avenue). 8. 1317 CABRILLO AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (BOB AND CINDY GILSON, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND CHU DESIGN AND ENGINEERING DESIGNER) PROJECT PLANNER ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated May 27, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Bob Gilson, 30 Woodgate Court, Hillsborough and James Chu, 55 West 43rtl Street, San Mateo; represented the applicant. Commission comments: • Clarified that the ridgeline will be at nearly 30-feet; it is a lot of mass; concern about being so close to the maximum height, could the height be reduced. �- Complimented the porch design. 13 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 ■ Concern about the amount of imperious pavement. ■ The trim around the nook on the left side of the house appears skimpy. ■ Some of the bedrooms are quite small; some of the rooms would be difficult to furnish. ■ Concern that the porch is pretty minimal, not very deep; neighborhood has a lot of small stucco homes, design is somewhat foreign to the neighborhood; but concerned about the massive porch columns; could be made a bit more delicate to fit with the rest of the house, creating more usability on the porch; look at the existing design vocabulary of the neighborhood. ■ Concerned about lack of light into the kitchen, try to reduce need for artificial lighting, suggest adding a skylight above the kitchen sink to bring in more natural light. ■ Would like to have ridgeline brought down. ■ Setback the home by an additional three to four feet to reduce the face print of the structure on the street. ■ Eliminate exterior light on right elevation. ■ Specify that columns have no seams. ■ Porch could use a bit of re-working; add more substantial trim or beam above the columns. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public comment period. Public comments: ■ Peter Wu, 1315 Cabrillo Avenue; Rolando Pasquale, 1316 Cabrillo Avenue; Sue Martinez, 1321 Cabrillo Avenue; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; and Frank Lowe, 1333 Cabrillo Avenue spoke. Pushing the residence back will have more of an impact on neighboring property. The house doesn't blend with the neighborhood. The house is completely out of character with the ...� neighborhood; is a monster house when compared with other homes on the block; all other homes are one-story; this one should be one story. Telling that moving the residence back could impact the maneuvering of cars on the lot. Being built for nothing but resale. Neighbors would likely back off if builder would commit to living on the property for five years. Provided a photograph taken today of the "Our Lady of Angels" school yard, showing shadows; consider where shade and shadow impacts will be following the construction of a 30-foot structure. Asked that the project be deferred to consider what the shade and shadow impacts will be; should be submitted to the school for review. Allowing the Special Permit will devalue adjacent property. The home will overpower the street. The charts displayed at hearing do now show the size of the residence being demolished. Should be able to compare what is being removed with what is being built. No consideration given to the dream houses of the long-term residents in the neighborhood. The architect states that the new owner of the building requested the number of bedrooms and bathrooms; who owns the property? Should be totally re-designed. Need to consider privacy of neighbors. Should consider requiring replacement with a like house. One of the last blocks in the neighborhood without a large number of monster houses. Build a house that is consistent with the neighborhood, but economically feasible for the developer. Additional Commission comments: ■ Is there some way to reduce the 30 foot height of the structure? There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Unapproved Minutes May 27,2008 Further Commission comments: • Reminiscent of a recent project on Drake Avenue in terms of improper fit in the neighborhood;the design needs to consider what best fits with the community; be sensitive to the neighborhood character. • A photo montage would be helpful to show how the house will fit in with the neighborhood. • Bring back with a softer design for the roof. • Encouraged the architect and applicant to spend some time with the neighbors and getting a better sense of the neighborhood. • Neighbors need to take case for more stringent standards to the legislators. Commissioner Vistica made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the RegularAction Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-1-1(CommissionerAuran recused,Commissioner Cauchi absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:56 p.m. Commissioner Auran returned to the dais. Commissioner Lindstrom indicated that he has a potential conflict ofinterest related to Agenda Item 9(2520 Valdivia Way) and would be recusing himself. He stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chambers,and the meeting,at 9:57 p.m. 9. 2520 VALDIVIA WAY, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A SINGLE STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ROBERT MEDAN,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND LEE AND MARGIE LIVINGSTON,PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated May 27,2008,with attachments. Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Robert Medan,1936 Los Altos Drive,San Mateo and Lee Livingston,2520 Valdivia Way;represented the applicant. Commission comments: • Applauded the thought that went into the design. Straightforward application. Clarify that double porch columns will be installed on front(double 6 x 6s),similarto design on rear. • Clarify that windows will be simulated,true divided light,metal clad design. Like the modest design;look at design of bathroom and kitchen for accessibility in the future. • Clarify wood trim over windows. Vice-Chair Terrones opened the public comment period. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 Public comments: • Fred Dias, 2516 Valdivia Way (neighbor to the right); not sure what is being planned between the houses; concerned about privacy from his bedroom that faces the applicant's home. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Vistica made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Discussion of motion: • Requested the installation of story poles. Vice-Chair Terrones called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2(Commissioners Lindstrom and Cauchi absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:10 p.m. X. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS None XI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Commission Communications: • Community Development Director Meeker noted that a final Planning inspection was recently conducted at 3066 Hillside Drive, and found that excess paving had been removed from the property on the west side of the garage, and that a planter area had been installed, consistent with the City Council's May 5, 2008 action related to the property owner's (Mimi Sien's) appeal. Actions from Regular City Council meeting of May 19, 2008: • None FYI: 2537 Hayward Drive requested changes to a previously approved design review project: • Bring back as an action item. FYI: 1315 Edgehill Drive—changes required by conditions of approval for a previously approved design review project: • Accepted FYI: Peninsula Hospital Complaint Log —Amended Logs for March and April. 2008: • Accepted 16 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes May 27, 2008 Commissioner Brownrigg asked about subcommittee assignments and mentioned the recent Green Building event conducted by the City of Burlingame. Community Development Director Meeker indicated that he will meet with Chair Cauchi regarding the subcommittee assignments. XII. ADJOURNMENT Vice-Chair Terrones adjourned the meeting at 10: 15 p.m. Respectfully submitted. Stanley Vistica, Secretary 17 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES City Council Chambers 501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California June 9, 2008 - 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Cauchi called the June 9, 2008, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Cauchi, Lindstrom, Vistica and Yie Absent: Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones Staff Present: Community Development Director, William Meeker; Zoning Technician Lisa Whitman; and City Attorney, Larry Anderson 111. MINUTES Commissioner Auran moved, seconded by Commissioner Vistica to approve the minutes of the May 17, 2008 Joint Meeting with the City Council and the May 27, 2008 regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Motion passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR None VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1524 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED RR — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE AND VARIANCES FOR PARKING AND LANDSCAPING FOR AN INDOOR BASKETBALL FACILITY (NOTHING BUT HOOPS, APPLICANT; EDWARD AND MADELINE ROBERTS TRUST (LINDA MENON AND FLORENCE KREBS, CO-TRUSTEES), PROPERTY OWNERS; AND JERRY WINGES ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER LISA WHITMAN Zoning Technician Whitman presented a summary of the staff report, dated June 9, 2008. Commission comments: Can consideration be given to off-site parking (City Attorney— may be considered as a Variance, with a lease of off-site spaces as mitigation)? • If a contractual obligation is broken, what happens with the Variance (City Attorney— may be brought back to the Planning Commission for review). CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 • Ensure that the applicant has a lease for at least 25 spaces. • Have there been complaints at the current location? • Ensure that off-site spaces are not required spaces for the occupant of that property; need to demonstrate that a surplus of parking exists at the off-site parking location. • Current location has a lot of drop-off and pick-up; has consideration been given to this aspect of the use. • What is the City's parking requirement based upon; is our parking standard based upon the sort of parking that is being observed as required by other commercial recreation uses. • Not clear in application how children are a part of the operation; mostly about adults; for children,will there primarily be a drop-off? • Would like to find a way to make it work; but if parking is problematic, will not be successful. • Consider the whole picture for parking, circulation and drop-off. • The use is child-intensive; there will be a lot of parents also staying to watch the games. • Have applicant take a closer look at the number of participants that will be at the location prior to 5 p.m. on weekdays. • Take a closer look at staff accommodations; will be three times the size of the current facility, and more intense; is proposed staffing level adequate? • There may be volleyball tournaments; when will they take place; what will be the impact upon circulation and parking during those times? • There may be a way to get additional parking spaces in the corner near the electrical service area. • Are limited retail sales a part of the use; is this permissible in the zone? This item was set for the Consent Calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar- Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Cauchi asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to pull any item off the consent calendar. Item 2a (2520 Valdivia Way) was pulled from the Consent Calendarby Stephen Wilson, attorney for Brian Philip, 2524 Valdivia Way. 2b. 1219 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTS AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING FOOD ESTABLISHMENT (DES ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND DAVID ARMANINO, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Commissioner Auran moved approval of the Consent Calendar(Item 2b) based on the facts in the staff reports, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff report, with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. Commissioner Lindstrom recused himself from participation in the discussion regarding Agenda Item 2. (2520 Valdivia Way), since he has a business relationship with the applicant,he left the Council Chambers. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 2a. 2520 VALDIVIA WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A SINGLE STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ROBERT MEDAN,APPLICANTAND ARCHITECT;AND LEE AND MARGIE LIVINGSTON, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008, with attachments. Zoning Technician Whitman presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven (11) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Lee Livingston, 2520 Valdivia Way and Robert Medan, 1936 Los Altos Drive, San Mateo; represented the applicant. • The neighbor's impacted views are secondary views, not from primary living space within the residence. • The neighbors made changes to the master bedroom suite installing a solid stucco wall on a patio; the wall doesn't allow views when seated in the residence. • Spoke to Mr. Philip yesterday and was told that his representative would not be speaking this evening. Commission comments: Seems that the height difference between existing and proposed is roughly 11-inches (applicant- actually 12-14 inches), the story poles seem to show a greater height than proposed on the plans (applicant - story poles are accurate, based upon 2" x 8" rafters, but could be 2" x 4", which would reduce height). • There is a false ceiling in the living room; could it be altered to reduce impact(applicant-needed to use the current design to resolve roof lines adequately); Did architect look at roofline options to reduce its height? • Views from the outdoor area should not be considered as "primary' views. • Encouraged use of 2" x 4" construction to reduce height impacts. Public comments: Stephen Wilson, 500 Sansome Street, San Francisco, attorney for Brian Philip, neighbor at 2524 Valdivia Way; and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke: • The Philips have not had an adequate opportunity to consider alternative solutions given that story poles only recently were installed. While no one is guaranteed a view, it is an important amenity; agrees that the views are secondary, but are a significant secondary view. Concerned with uncertainty about where the roofline will actually be when constructed. • Philip is willing to spend his own money to identify alternatives for consideration. Recommend a postponement for two meetings to provide the neighbor an opportunity to review alternatives. Asked if this the second or third time that this item has been reviewed by the Commission; if it is the second time, then perhaps there hasn't been enough opportunity by the neighbor to review the �" proposal. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: • There would be a view blockage of the East Bay hills from the living room; should be continued to allow a review of options. • Views from outdoor space are not protected;there is some view blockage from interior of home, but not certain if it is significant enough to be considered a substantial impact. • Would be important to have all Commissioners view the property and the view impacts in advance of action regarding the proposal. Commissioner Auran moved to continue to the June 23, 2008 regular Meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: • None Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to continue the item until June 23, 2008. The motion passed 4-0-1-2(Commissioner Lindstrom recused, Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). This item concluded at 7:40 p.m. Commissioner Lindstrom returned to the dais. 3. 2673 MARTINEZ DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR MAIN AND LOWER LEVEL ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (MARWAN ZEIDAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND DAVID MIRAFLOR, DESIGNER) PROJECT PLANNER LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008, with attachments. Zoning Technician Whitman presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven (11) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Marwan Zeidan, 2673 Martinez Drive; represented the applicant. Commission comments: • On proposed first floor plan; two sinks in the bathroom are in an L-shaped configuration; would not be workable. • On front elevation,three windows to right of door, a trim detail is shown that seems to go behind the shutters; this detail is not shown elsewhere on the house; should be consistent and spelled out on the plans;there is a "typical window detail' called out;the Commission assumes that treatment on all of the windows on the building; provide a clear representation of how the windows are being treated. • The wrought-iron detail on the garage is overdone. • A more consistent theme than previously; but need to have plans drawn accurately. Public comments: Byron and Miriam Maldonado, 1 Toledo Court spoke: 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 Concerned about the size of the addition at the rear; with construction, they will lose their view and will be looking at the deck. • Have requested that neighbor trim his bushes, haven't seen the story poles because of the bushes. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: • Needs to be continued to allow window details to be correctly represented; and the property owner needs to trim the trees. • Concern about railings; calm them down a bit, too ornate; and provide missing railing on steps. • Doesn't believe that the impact on the neighbor is that great, given the location of the addition. • Bring back as Consent Calendar item when ready. Commissioner Vistica moved to continue the application to bring back on Consent Calendar when trim details modified according to reduction;trim trees prior to bringing the item back and review railing details on front and rear. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: None Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2(Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). This item concluded at 8:05 p.m. 4. 2537 HAYWARD DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR A CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(PATTYAND ANDREW JORDAN,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;AND GEORGE SKINNER ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Noted that a revised window plan was submitted to the Commission at the meeting. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Patty and Andrew Jordan, 2537 Hayward Drive, and Victor Zvarich, building contractor, represented the applicant. When they reviewed the window designs at the window showrooms, felt that the grid pattern would impact views; only want grid pattern on upper part of windows on the full house. Commission comments: Appreciated the design of the plan submitted at the meeting; front window was the primary concern. Need to match the grid pattern on lower window above the garage. Public comments: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 • None There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Auran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 6, 2008, sheets A3 and A4, and date stamped June 11, 2007, sheets Al, A2, A5 through A8 and Landscape Plan, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the final design of the windows shall be returned to the Planning Commission as an FYI; 3. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's, City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's March 5, 2007 memos shall be met; 4. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Floor Area Ratio Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectura. features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance whict requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 13. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica. Discussion of motion: • May look cramped to have the same grid pattern on the upper window over the garage. • Believe that the design will likely work. • Important that the vertical mullions line up; if not the design will not look right. • Bring back final design as an FYI. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2(Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:14 p.m. 5. 1459 OAK GROVE AVENUE, ZONED R-3 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, REAR SETBACK VARIANCE AND PARKING VARIANCE FORA NEW THREE-STORY,THREE- UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND MIKE PRESCOTT, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008, with attachments. Zoning Technician Whitman presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirty-six (36) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Cauchi opened the public hearing. Commission comments: • None Lynne Le, 851 Burlway Road; represented the applicant. • The current architect took over the project from a prior architect for preparation of construction documents. Additional Commission comments: Requested explanation of need for Variance (applicant- lost dimension of parking due to moving exterior wall for shoring purposes). • Thought fapade changes were going to return to what was originally approved. Was a door added that was not part of the previous approval? Variances are tough to grant when the hardship is not readily apparent. Door on west elevation doesn't match the original approved, or the revised; which is to be installed? Brought e-mail from neighbor to applicant's attention. Circular windows on west elevation; the original submittal design appears to work better; the door would likely fit in better with that configuration, if trimmed out correctly. Clarified need for rear setback Variance (applicant - due to enclosure of rear stairway). Public comments: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 ■ None There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ "Ok" with rear setback Variance; stairway encouraged to provide access to rear-yard for greater usability. ■ Vehicles are likely to get smaller; parking requirement may be excessive; compact spaces are "ok". ■ Side doorway needs to be trimmed out. ■ Unfortunate that the Commission must consider a parking Variance at this late date in the process. Commissioner Vistica moved to continue the application to June 23, 2008 with the following direction: ■ West elevation shall revert back to the window arrangement originally approved plans (sheet A7 of original drawings). ■ The exit door from the stairway shall be incorporated into the window pattern and augmented with a trim package that relates to the windows above. ■ The main entry door design is acceptable. The matter should be placed on the Consent Calendar when it returns on the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Discussion of motion: ■ Have the door be an architectural door that will add light to stairway, if possible. Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion to continue to June 23, 2008 and place the item on the Consent Calendar. The motion passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 6. 2700 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SECOND FLOOR FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ORA HATHEWAY, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND ADIB AND SYLVIA KHOURI, PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Cauchi opened the public comment period. Ora Hatheway, P O Box 150432, San Rafael; represented the applicant. ■ Met with neighbors, nine did not object. Two objected. "1 ■ One person was concerned with view blockage; _ 8 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION—Unapproved Minutes June 9,2008 Commission comments: • Would be appropriate to have wood siding along both Kenmar and Summit elevations. • Reusing a lot of windows(applicant-only the double-paned windows). • Concern regarding enlargement of the rear deck;the existing deck is rather large,but seems to be a bit of a privacy impact upon the neighbor;doesn't see the need for the enlarged deck(applicant- client is willing to eliminate this aspect of the design). Public comments: Anne and Cliff Reghetti,2705 Summit;and Edna Steele,18 EI Quanito spoke: • Asked if there will there be story poles(Commission—yes). • Asked if this is the second time a Variance has been requested? There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: • Regarding the second-floor Variance,there are several other homes on Kenmar that have similar conditions with similar additions due to the down slope of the lots;none of the other homes have the two-foot offset;it is a prevalent condition in the neighborhood. • Feels that massing of the addition on Kenmar may block some of the sun for the homeowner;will feel pretty massive;bulk and mass will be facing Summit and Kenmar;consider pushing back the master bedroom suite to reduce impact. • Deck expansion should be eliminated;there is probably a way to incorporate a door to the existing deck from the master bedroom suite;will require a review of the roofline of the addition. • Wood siding should be provided in lieu of stucco. Commissioner Vistica made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Discussion of motion: • Install story poles. • Location of the master bath on the upper level is not directly over the bathroom below. Is this a design error? Rearranging the bedroom so that the bathrooms can be stacked would be less expensive to construct. Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2(Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:48 p.m. CommissionerAuran recused himself from the discussion regarding Agenda Item 7(12 77 Balboa Avenue) due to a business relationship with the applicant;he left the Council Chambers. 7. 1277 BALBOA AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FRONT SETBACK �— VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FORA NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(JAMES CHU,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;AND BOB AND CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION— Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 CINDY GILSON PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report dated June 9, 2008,with attachments. Zoning Technician Whitman briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Cauchi opened the public comment period. Commission comments: • Provide information regarding setbacks on other side of the street. James Chu, 55 West 43rd Avenue, San Mateo and Bob Gilson; represented the applicant. • Variance requested due to shallow depth of lot;wish to preserve a useable rear-yard by bring house forward; second floor setback is still over 20-feet; the Variance relates to the location of the porch. • Have reviewed the plans with the neighbors. Commission comments: • Front door looks like it is recessed, but not so on plan; which will it be (applicant- will be recessed); don't recess it so much that it opens into the living room. • A good design solution, given the size of the lot. • Style is appropriate given the style of other homes in area. • Trim piece on top of entry door appears to be similar to treatment of top of dormers; should probably be a bit heavier to work better with the columns. • Noted concern that every bedroom doesn't need to have a bathroom; perhaps more closet space and a "Jack and Jill" bathroom between bedrooms. • Be cognizant of maximum height limit so as not to exceed it. • On the right elevation, look at the consistency of shutter arrangement. • Consider making the porch brick to match the columns. Public comments: Ron Daher, 1273 Balboa Avenue; Wayne Walden, 1613 Easton Drive; and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke: • Support the project;would like the Commission to approve the Variances; moving the house closer to the street provides more privacy for neighbors. • Thinks that some of the other Colonials around town are designed better; eyebrow dormers should be placed back into the roofline. • The front porch should have the columns extending down to the ground. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Vistica made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete, noting the following: • The small size of the lot supports the Variances. • The existing homes are atypically placed further from the street since they are larger lots. • Consider removing brick bases on entry column. • Increase depth of arched windows over the entry. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes June 9, 2008 ■ Consider location of front door in relation to the front wall. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: ■ None. Chair Cauchi called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2-1 (Commissioner Auran recused, Commissioners Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:06 p.m. Commissioner Auran returned to the dais. X. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS There were no Commissioner's Reports. XI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Commission Communications: ■ None Actions from Regular City Council meeting of June 2, 2008: ■ Community Development Director Meeker noted the study session regarding the draft Historic Resources Inventory for the Downtown Specific Plan. FYI: Peninsula Hospital Complaint Log — May, 2008: ■ Accepted. ■ Commissioner Vistica indicated that, in response to neighbors' complaints regarding vibration from the hospital construction, there may be other methods to address concerns from neighbors. The Commission noted the impending retirement of City Attorney Anderson and praised him for his work with the Commission. XII. ADJOURNMENT Chair Cauchi adjourned the meeting at 9:09 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stanley Vistica, Secretary 11 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31 , 2008 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF & County Pool 21,496,974.70 21,496,974.70 21 ,496,974.70 50.58 1 1 2.990 3.032 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 21,000,000.00 21 ,112,730.00 21 ,000,751.60 49.42 1,733 1 ,509 4.689 4.754 42,496,974.70 42,609,704.70 42,497,726.30 100.00% 857 746 3.830 3.883 Investments Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 152,185.56 1 ,617,471 .97 Average Daily Balance 44,233,837.71 36,840,650.30 Effective Rate of Return 4.05% 4.77% Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and availability of some oft funds is restricted by law (e.g. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). 93 r Co - <fD JESUS NAVA, INANCE DIR./TREASUR R Reporting period 05/01/2008-05/31/2008 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 06/11/2008 - 09:48 PM (PRF—PMI) SymRept 6.41.202a Report Ver. 5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2008 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 9,547,432.04 9,547,432.04 9,547,432.04 3.072 3.072 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 11,949,542.66 11,949,542.66 11,949,542.66 3.000 Aaa 3.000 1 Subtotal and Average 21,362,118.37 21,496,974.70 21,496,974.70 21,496,974.70 3.032 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 31331XB35 536 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/04/2007 1,000,000.00 1,000,310.00 1,000,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,464 06/04/2012 31331YGR5 545 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/07/2007 1,000,000.00 1,005,940.00 1,000,000.00 4.490 4.490 1,650 12/07/2012 31331YJ76 553 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/01/2008 1,000,000.00 998,500.00 1,000,000.00 4.250 4.250 1,795 05/01/2013 3133XJ6F0 531 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/20/2006 1,000,000.00 1,001,250.00 1,000,000.00 5.025 Aaa 5.025 932 12/20/2010 3133XKL94 534 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/23/2007 1,000,000.00 1,024,060.00 1,000,000.00 5.250 Aaa 5.250 1,422 04/23/2012 3133XL51-3 537 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/08/2007 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 998,501.60 5.250 Aaa 5.330 368 06/04/2009 3133XMKS9 541 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/22/2007 1,000,000.00 1,026,880.00 1,000,000.00 5.020 Aaa 5.020 1,604 10/22/2012 3133XMRN3 542 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/30/2007 1,000,000.00 1,010,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 1,612 10/30/2012 3133XMTP6 543 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/05/2007 1,000,000.00 1,010,310.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 1,618 11/05/2012 3133XMSW2 544 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/16/2007 1,000,000.00 1,016,560.00 1,000,000.00 4.850 Aaa 4.850 1,629 11/16/2012 3133XNW21 546 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/07/2008 1,000,000.00 1,009,690.00 1,000,000.00 4.375 Aaa 4.375 1,681 01/07/2013 3133XNYV5 547 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/22/2008 1,000,000.00 997,810.00 1,000,000.00 4.050 Aaa 4.050 1,696 01/22/2013 3133XP3C6 548 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2008 1,000,000.00 995,940.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 Aaa 4.000 1,703 01/29/2013 3133XQEH1 549 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/18/2008 1,000,000.00 993,750.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 Aaa 4.000 1,751 03/18/2013 3133XPSF2 551 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/24/2008 1,000,000.00 985,310.00 996,250.00 3.875 Aaa 3.980 1,373 03/05/2012 3133XQZT2 552 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2008 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 Aaa 4.000 1,794 04/30/2013 3128X5LP1 529 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 10/06/2006 1,000,000.00 1,006,680.00 1,000,000.00 5.250 Aaa 5.250 1,222 10/06/2011 3128X6AZ9 538 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 08/30/2007 1,000,000.00 1,027,820.00 1,006,000.00 5.400 Aaa 5.254 1,464 06/04/2012 3128X6NV4 540 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 10/17/2007 1,000,000.00 1,010,460.00 1,000,000.00 5.400 Aaa 5.400 1,599 10/17/2012 3128X7BK9 550 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 03/26/2008 1,000,000.00 989,580.00 1,000,000.00 4.200 Aaa 4.200 1,759 03/26/2013 3136FBRX5 539 FANNIE MAE 09/05/2007 1,000,000.00 1,007,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.500 Aaa 5.500 1,557 09/05/2012 Subtotal and Average 22,871,719.34 21,000,000.00 21,112,730.00 21,000,751.60 4.754 1,509 Total and Average 44,233,837.71 42,496,974.70 42,609,704.70 42,497,726.30 3.883 746 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/1112008-09:48 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Cash May 31, 2008 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Average Balance 0.00 0 Total Cash and Investmentss 44,233,837.71 42,496,974.70 42,609,704.70 42,497,726.30 3.883 746 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/11/2008-09:46 PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept 6.41.202a CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page Activity By Type May 1, 2008 through May 31, 2008 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 3.072 0.00 2,000,000.00 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 3.000 624,553.27 0.00 Subtotal 22,872,421.43 624,553.27 2,000,000.00 21,496,974.70 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 31331YJ76 553 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.250 05/01/2008 1,000,000.00 0.00 3133XKU37 535 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.450 05/30/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 Subtotal 22,000,751.60 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 21,000,751.60 Total 44,873,173.03 1,624,553.27 4,000,000.00 42,497,726.30 Portfolio CITY CP PM(PRF_PM3)SymRept 6.41.202a Run Date:06/11/2008-09:48 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Activity Summary May 2007 through May 2008 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity May 2007 14 36,803,146.43 4.906 4.974 4.995 1 0 472 352 June 2007 15 36,293,438.53 4.981 5.050 5.010 2 1 524 416 July 2007 15 34,975,633.40 5.031 5.101 5.093 0 0 544 419 August 2007 16 32,703,250.60 5.021 5.090 5.063 1 0 635 488 September 2007 16 31,668,522.79 5.017 5.087 5.049 1 1 679 524 October 2007 17 32,552,669.40 5.083 5.153 5.060 3 2 761 652 November 2007 18 33,111,553.85 4.981 5.051 4.865 2 1 826 725 December 2007 17 35,305,823.83 4.855 4.922 4.696 1 2 764 686 January 2008 20 39,645,080.87 4.721 4.787 4.564 3 0 819 735 February 2008 20 39,674,639.82 4.519 4.582 4.171 0 0 818 721 March 2008 22 38,707,871.96 4.460 4.522 4.026 2 0 933 818 April 2008 23 44,873,173.03 4.017 4.073 3.336 2 1 852 747 May 2008 23 42,497,726.30 3.830 3.883 3.032 1 1 857 746 Average 18 36,831,733.14 4.725% 4.790% 4.535 1 1 730 618 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/11/2008-09:48 PM(PRF_PM4)SymRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Distribution of Investments By Type May 2007 through May 2008 May June July August September October November December January February March April May Average Security Type 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 by Period LAIF&County Pool 64.7 61.4 60.0 54.1 52.6 50.8 48.6 54.7 52.1 52.1 45.7 51.0 50.6 53.7% Certificates of Deposit-Bank Certificates of Deposit-S&L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln Negotiable CD's-Bank CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing Commercial Paper-Discount Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 35.3 38.6 40.0 45.9 47.4 49.2 51.4 45.3 47.9 47.9 54.3 49.0 49.4 46.3% Federal Agency Issues-Discount Treasury Securities-Coupon Treasury Securities-Discount Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon Miscellaneous Securities-Discount Non Interest Bearing Investments Mortgage Backed Securities Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2 Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/1112008-09:48 PM(PRF_PM5)SyrnRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 7 Interest Earnings Summary May 31, 2008 May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 103,750.00 660,441.67 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 244,978.88 244,978.88 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 256,794.17) ( 90,169.32) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 91,934.71 815,251.23 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 91,934.71 815,251.23 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 956,506.22 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 459,358.87 459,358.87 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 399,108.02) ( 613,644.35) Interest Earned during Period 60,250.85 802,220.74 Total Interest Earned during Period 152,185.56 1,617,471.97 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 152,185.56 1,617,471.97 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:06/11/2008-09:48 PM(PRF_PM6)SynnRept 6 41.202a Report Ver.5.00 astound1 Cable * Internet a Phone 0 Friday May 30, 2008 City of Burlingame James Nantell, City Manager City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 Dear Mr. Nantell: Astound has been making significant progress bringing our customers state-of-the-art cable television, high-speed Internet access and telephone services during the past year. We have expanded our program offerings, added new HDTV channels such as KQED HD, TBS HD, Discovery HD, TLC HD and more, added new TV On Demand programming and increased our Internet access speeds. Still, our content providers continue to raise prices for programming. As a consequence, several of our rates will be increased and one rate will be decreased. The rates for Limited service is being increased from $19.95 to $21 .95 and our Expanded Basic Service will increase from $48.50 to $49.95 Our digital tiers, digital packages, premium channels and HD equipment are anticipated to have the following increases and decrease: Digital Basic, Digital Variety, Digital Sports — will increase by $1 .00 Digital Basic Pack, Digital Value Pack — will increase by $4.00 Digital Bronze, Digital Silver, Digital Gold, Digital Platinum — will increase by $6.00 HD DVR, HD Receiver — will increase by $5.00 HDTV Service — will decrease by $5.00 Showtime — will increase by $2.00 Low Speed Internet - 256 Kbps downstream / 128 Kbps upstream — No Price Increase Mid Speed Internet - 1 .5 Mbps downstream / 256 Kbps upstream — No Price Increase High Speed Internet - 6 Mbps downstream / 1 Mbps upstream — No Price Increase Power User Internet - 10 Mbps downstream / 1 Mbps upstream — No Price Increase Power User Pius Internet - 10 Mbps downstream / 1 .5 Mbps upstream — No Price Increase Service Calls — No Price increase as Astound continues to provide FREE Local Service Calls! Depending on a Customer's billing cycle, these price increases and price decrease will commence no earlier than July 1 , 2008. Astound looks forward to further enhancing our network and service offerings to provide competitive cable television, high speed Internet access and telephone services to the residents of City and County of San Francisco. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, j Tim Peters Vice President Astound Broadband (Office) 925-459-1055 215 Mason Circle, Concord, CA 94520 1-800-4-ASTOUND (1-800-427-8686) fax 925-459-1102 www.astound.net j DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION OF SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE WESLEY MANALASTAS 4� declares that: The annexed advertisement has been regularly published PUBLIC NOTICE ro in the ASTOUND CUSTOMERS, We .apprecla;B your business. Astc,UAtrf, re- cently increaSP up- Sp d' SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE servie. additl dontIn . � 'IM for . In the -creases l programming which is and was at all times herein mentioned fees paid to the channel s, established as newspaper of general circulation in the to carry their channeis.� Beginnin in July, As- Citi, and Counts, of San Francisco State of as found wilt pass through= `J `J > California, I crease to cable TV sus- portion the rn• that term is defined by Section 6000 of the Government cre tomers and absorb the remaining expense itself. Code. ,Specific details will' be sent out by mail.Astound is proud to continue to offer you the best every- SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE day low prices, the most. choice and the highest (Name of Newspaper) duality,service'in the Bay Area. Thank you for choosing Astound.. a .nv�' 901 Mission Street 1800-427-8686 - San Francisco, CA 94103 From May 26, 2008 To May 26, 2008 Namely, on May 26, 2008 (Dates of Publication) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 27, 2008 at San Francisco, California. Wesley Manalastas