Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2012.02.09BURLINGAME TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION AGENDA February 9, 2012 7:00 p.m. — Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —January 12, 2012 and January 19, 2012 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the State -Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "Request To Speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Commission Chairperson may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. CURRENT BUSINESS 7.1 Residential Parking Permit Consideration —Crescent Avenue 7.2 Downtown Parking Improvements &Parking Rate Changes —Burlingame Avenue Downtown District 8. INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF 8.1 Engineer's Report —Report and update on various construction projects 8.1.1 Thermoplastic striping project update 8.1 .2 Requests for stop signs, crosswalks, and speed control • Murchison/California pedestrian safety • Neuchatel/Willborough narrow street concerns • Rollins/Morrell intersection concerns • Larkspur/Linden speeding concerns 8.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report —General/Selective Traffic Enforcement Report 8.3 Commissioners' Comments and Concerns 9. COMMUNICATIONS Report by Staff or Commissioners of citizen concerns or complaints regarding traffic, safety and parking issues that are within the Commission's jurisdiction. 1U, COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1 Burlingame Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (B/PAC) item on this agenda Committee meets 5:30PM in Conference Room B before each TSPC meeting. 10.2 Website/Communications Subcommittee 10.3 Pedestrian Corridors Subcommittee 10.4 Neighborhood Parking subcommittee 11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS regarding any item on this agenda Dates for discussion to be determined later by Staff or Commissioners. 12. ADJOURNMENT Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Engineering Counter at City Hall located at 501 Primrose Road during normal business hours. -2- MINUTES -ITEM 5 (JANUARY 12, 2012 & JANUARY 19, 2012) The City of Burlingame CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 w .budingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, January 12, 2012 Commissioners Present: Laurie Simonson, Chair Nicklas Akers, Vice Chair Jeff Londer Mark Noworolski Commissioners Absent: Caroline Serrato Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Transportation Engineer, Public Works Corporal Chuck Witt, Police Department Visitors: Lord Fernandez Julie Pak 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners present. (Commissioner Serrato absent) 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT None. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Motion: To accept the minutes of December 8, 2011 as submitted M/S/C: Londer/Akers; 4/0/1 (Commissioner Serrato absent) 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS None, 7. CURRENT BUSINESS 7.1 Residential Parking Permit Consideration —Crescent Avenue 11 Mr. Chou informed the Commission that he received comments from a resident of the 200 block of Crescent Avenue requesting the block be included in the Residential Parking Permit Program due to the lack of parking. This block only has four residences. Mr. Chou explained that the Residential Parking Permit Program only applies on streets with time restrictions. Since this street does not currently have time restrictions it would require Council approval to have time limits imposed before any consideration for a permit program on the street. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that residents in the area will be notified that this item will be discussed at next month's meeting. 8. Information/Discussion Items from Commission and Staff 8.1 Traffic Engineer's Report —Report and update on various construction projects Mr. Chou reiterated that the Commission will be having the parking study presentation Special Meeting next Thursday, January 19th at 7:00 here in Council Chambers. DBID members and the public have also been invited to this meeting. The presentation will be quite comprehensive in that it covers parking occupancy rate, parking rates, smart meters, implementation of smart meters, streetscape project, costs and funding. The Commission will be asked to provide recommendations to the Council on several specific items. 8.1.1 Thermoplastic striping project update Mr. Chou reported that the annual project is almost complete. The intersection at Broadway and California Drive was completed last month. All crosswalks on Oak Grove Avenue have been done. The only thing remaining on Oak Grove Avenue is to install new wheelchair ramps at Ansel Road. Thermoplastic has been laid down on several section of Trousdale Drive; however, the striping was not yet completed. He added that Trousdale Drive should be completed within the next two weeks. 8.1.2 Requests for stop signs, crosswalks and speed control • Murchison/California pedestrian safety Mr. Chou report ed that information regarding the stop sign warrant was given to the City of Millbrae. He added that both city staffs still need to meet to better identify and address the specific safety needs at this intersection. • Neuchatel narrow streets Mr. Chou report ed that the resident wanted to initiate discussion mid-January; and, that staff would come back to the Commission on this item as a formal discussion item if action was needed. Otherwise, the matter would be brought back to the Commission with an Engineer's report and update. Peninsula/Humboldt left -turn Mr. Chou reported that the City of San Mateo has issued a work order for their striping crew to install turn lane guide markers at the intersection for left turns from northbound Humboldt onto westbound Peninsula Avenue. 8.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report —General/Selective Traffic Enforcement Report Corporal Witt reported that Mr. Chou and he have received a few minor engineering and parking complaints. Other than that there is nothing to report. 8.3 Commissioners' Comments and Concerns None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Chou reported that he received two communications, which are as follows: • Jackie Wong regarding concerns for the sight visibility and speeds at Rollins Road and Morrell Avenue, Mr. Chou said that staff would contact and work with Mr. Wong on this matter. He added that staff would look at engineering design and also put this on the selective enforcement list. Mr. Chou said that he would follow up with an update on next month's Engineer's report. Mr. Chou also provided print outs of photos that were attached to the email communication. • Janet McDonald expressed her concerns regarding speeding on Larkspur and Linden. Mr. Chou said that staff would follow up with the resident to address these concerns. Chair Simonson noted that the December minutes indicated that this intersection would be added back on the selective enforcement list and spot radar would be placed there. Mr. Chou reported that spot radar was not performed because the holiday season would not provide an accurate reflection of data. Corporal Witt stated that this intersection would remain on the selective enforcement list through January. Commissioner Akers asked that staff respond to these two communications that their issues were reported to this Commission and that the Commission has requested that these issues be followed up on. 10.COMMISSION &COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1 Burlingame Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory committee (B/PAC) Mr. Chou reported that the committee met this evening. They looked at some preliminary design ideas to improve bicycling for Carolan Avenue. He stated that the preliminary designs were for feasibility and only at 25% completion. The consensus 3 of the committee was to consider the simpler of the two designs, which was restriping Carolan Avenue to one lane in each direction with a shared left -turn lane and dedicated Class II bike lanes. Potential funding was also discussed. Mr. Chou stated that once the in-house feasibility designs reach approximately 50%, traffic studies would be performed to confirm volumes and capacities of the roadway. 10.2 Website/Communications Subcommittee No report. 10.3 Pedestrian Corridors Subcommittee No report. 10.4 Neighborhood Parking Working Group No report. 11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 11.1 Alternate parking lots uses: Post Office &others (pending) Mr. Chou request that this item be removed as the matter would be discussed on a broader level initially between various City departments and commissions before coming to TSPC. 12.ADJOURNMENT 7:45 The City of Burlingame CALIFORNIA 940103997 ww .burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION —SPECIAL MEETING Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, January 19, 2012 Commissioners Present: Nicklas Akers, Vice Chair Jeff Londer Mark Noworolski Caroline Serrato Commissioners Absent: Laurie Simonson, Chair Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Transportation Engineer, Public Works Corporal Chuck Witt, Police Department Joanne Louie, Administrative Secretary, Public Works Syed Murtuza, Director of Public Works Art Morimoto, Assistant Director of Public Works Visitors: Dale Ferrel Michele Sidone Suzanne & Chris Gulick Peter Vorametsanti Howard Wetton Councilmember Michael Brownrigg William Hurrell, CDM Smith Consultants Mike Izzo, CDM Smith Consultants 1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL. 4 of 5 Commissioners present. (Chair Simonson absent) 4. DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME AVENUE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS/PARKING METER RATE PRESENTATION a) Presentation (Staff and CDM/Smith Consultants) Mr. Hurrell provided a brief explanation about CDM Smith Consultants, and how they were hired to update/analyze the parking district needs. He explained that a parking study was performed on a Thursday, Friday and Saturday in early October, 2011 for the occupancy analysis. The study reviewed and studied current conditions, occupancy and 1 parking patterns to make recommendations for improvement, as well as to analyze revenue options. Mr. Hurrell recited the following findings from the study: Weekday peak occupancy exceed practical capacity (91 %) Parking occupancy peaks at mid-day Core on -street parking occupancy peaks again after 6 pm During busiest times, off-street occupancy rates are great than on -street Current parking supply is insufficient and additional parking is needed to accommodate parking demand Demand for more time to park on Burlingame Avenue (based on merchant feedback) Need to implement smart meters to enhance the parking experience and improve efficiency Need for parking way -finding signage Mr. Murtuza provided information on the Burlingame Avenue Streetscape project and presented the three designs that were currently being considered and brought before Council. He also discussed funding needs for these designs, smart meter features, and cost and benefits. The following parking rate options were reviewed and discussed in detail: - Option A: 10 hours .25 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $450,000 annually - Option B: 10 hours &Sundays 25 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $670,000 annually - Option C: 12 hours 25 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $790,000 annually - Option D: 12 hours &Sundays 25 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $1,050,000 annually - Option E: 10 hours 50 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $720,000 annually 2 - Option F: 12 hours 50 cent increase Tiered rate increase on Burlingame Avenue Estimated to generate $1,050,000 annually b) Public Discussion and Feedback Vice Chair Akers opened the floor for public comment. Ms. Sidone, representative from DBID, wanted to reiterate what Mr. Murtuza went over. She stated that DBID felt the three issues of importance for them were increasing parking on Burlingame Avenue, need for smart meters on Burlingame Avenue, and the use of better signage for parking. She also said that the second Streetscape Design option presented was very popular amongst the merchants. Ms. Sidone's personal thought was that smart meters should be used in the core area for some sort of uniformity. Mr. Gulick asked the Commission to consider traffic and traffic flow when trying to improve the business district, such as one-way streets and timing of signals. He also expressed concern over the hazardous situation of pedestrians versus vehicles. He said that another idea was to close Burlingame Avenue to traffic at certain times of the day. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the maintenance record of smart meters; and, if there was software for capacity pricing. He added that some thought should be given regarding the reuse of at -grade parking and where a parking structure could be located. Councilmember Brownrigg states that, as a resident, he supports increasing the rate per hour but not extending the hours, nor including Sundays. Mr. Hurrell responded that smart meters have been around for a long time — as long as pay stations — and have been more reliable than pay stations. He said that software was available for capacity -based pricing, which would adjust to demand. Mr. Ferrel, DBID President, said that they would like to see extended time (90 minutes to two hours) for the meters on Burlingame Avenue. He said the biggest complaint from the merchants was that an hour meter was not adequate. Mr. Ferrel thought the merchants would also be interested in cellphone "apps" that offered remote paying for a meter and coupon offers from merchants. c) Commission Discussion Commissioner Londer offered a few ideas such as changing meter operation times from the current 8:00 am to 6:00 pm to 9/10:00 am to 7/8:00 pm. He said of Option E, charge $2.50 for the second hour with no time limit thereafter. Mr. Murt uza reminded the Commission that there was once problems with employees abusing unlimited parking and it took five years to turn that behavior around. He added that staff did not recommend going beyond 2 -hour parking on Burlingame Avenue. 3 Mr. Hurrel noted that extending hours does change behavior and would make it more difficult for employees and residents; however, the customer experience would be very positive. Discussion occurred amongst the Commissioners about the various options, smart meters way -find signage. Commissioner Serrato stated there was a need for the parking meters to indicate expiration (i.e., red flashing light) if the City chose to extend the hours. Commissioner Noworolski felt the first choice would not necessarily be the right choice and should be modified or adjusted down the road. He suggested that this issue be reviewed quarterly by TSPC and/or City Council. Vice Chair Akers reopened the floor for public comment. Mr. Wetton inquired if there was any consideration to enforce meters on Sundays during peak hours, such as 10:30 to 1:30. He noted that parking management influences traffic management. Mr. Wetton also mentioned that parking was very difficult on Broadway. Mr. Chou publicly acknowledged that TSPC received and reviewed eight email communications on this matter. They were from: Nancy Medeiros, Lesley Stohlz, Andrew Lapkin, Rudy Horak, Kate Phillips, Terry and Sue Hall, Florence Allen, Laurie Hilt for Jennifer Behling, Howard Hibbard and Sarah Jane. 5. Next Steps Mr. Chou explained that staff was looking for a recommendation from the Commission on the various plans based on Commission and public discussions so that a general plan could be brought before City Council, Motion: Move that the TSPC Commission makes the following recommendations to Council o City implement two-hour parking on Burlingame Avenue o City implement smart meters combined with sensors and a rich feature -set providing flexibility going forward in the downtown core o City adopt Option C: 12 -hour parking, 25 cent increase, which does not including Sunday parking o City implement improved signage in the downtown area and explore dynamic signage options along with parking lot improvements o Implementation and rate structure be reviewed on a quarterly basis by staff in cooperation with DBID, TSPC and as needed with Council Akers/Conder; 4/0/1 (Chair Simonson absent) 0 6. ADJOURNMENT 9:06 p.m. Vice Chair Akers adjourned with thanks and appreciation to the 297 Area Support Medical Company from the California Armory National Guard Unit on Humboldt Street, the last National Guard Unit to return from Iraq. E CURRENT BUSINESS -ITEM 7.1 Meeting STAFF REPORT Date: February 9, 2012 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 TO: Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission DATE: February 1, 2012 FROM: Augustine Chou, Transportation Engineer ,,' SUBJECT: Item 7.1 —Residential Parking Permit Consideration —Crescent Avenue RECOMMENDATION: For the Commission to receive public comment and input on whether to proceed further with greater consideration to implement a Residential Parking Permit Program (RPPP) for the 200 block of Crescent Avenue. DISCUSSION: The City received a request from Ms. Joy Burke regarding concerns over long-term daytime parking along the 200 block of Crescent Avenue. The concerns stem from a perception that employees of the new Safeway complex on Howard Avenue and Primrose Road are parking on the 200 block of Crescent for the duration of their work shift; thus making day time parking in front of the residences difficult. Roadway & Location Conditions The 200 block of Crescent Avenue is between Howard Avenue and Ralston Avenue. The street is 36' wide with parking lanes on each side of the street with single travel lanes in each direction. Currently, there are no parking restrictions on the entire length of Crescent, which includes both the 100 and 200 blocks. City parcel maps reveal that there are five lots on the 200 block of Crescent, with four lots having Crescent Avenue addresses. Streets north of this block of Crescent have 2 -hour parking time limits posted and enforced. Current Residential Permit Parking Program The City has an existing Residential Permit Parking Program (RPPP) policy in place. The program was implemented in 2006. Several streets and neighborhoods were identified and included in the initial program. There is an existing residential permit parking program in place in the surrounding neighborhood on streets such as portions of Occidental, Ralston, Burlingame, Howard, and Chapin Avenues. (See attached map). Currently, only Occidental residents have asked for the RPPP. In order for a street or neighborhood to be considered for a residential parking permit program, the first qualifying condition is for the existence of some type of on -street parking time restriction, such as 2 -hour parking. The neighborhood or street must also have an identifiable "parking impact generator" such as a school, business or commercial district, close by which causes long-term overflow parking problems. Observations and Analysis Staff conducted several field investigations of Crescent Avenue and observed that the majority of the street parking was always occupied. Staff also observed that the on -street parking situation on Crescent was less congested farther south, at the 100 block. Beyond the confirmation that there are some long- term parkers on the 200 block, it was not definitely established whether the parkers were residents, Safeway or other downtown business employees. An expansion and implementation of the RPPP onto the 200 block of Crescent Avenue will have impacts on the residents. Where there was no parking time limit restriction, there would have to be a new 2 -hour Page 1 of 2 S:W Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2012\2-09-12 SR -7.1 Crescent Permit Parking.doc limit and associated signs posted in front of their residences; and would require City Council authorization. Before this step, staff and the Commission must determine if there would be neighborhood support for a new 2 -hour limit on their street. Typically, the RPPP policy calls for a resident applicant to obtain 67% neighborhood concurrence on that street to proceed to the public process. However, with only 4-5 homes on the 200 block of Crescent, the matter is being brought before the Commission for public/neighborhood discussion in the interest of a quicker determination on next steps. Should the neighborhood response for a 2 -hour parking time in be negative, the City will have to determine alternate mitigating measures to address the long-term parking concerns. This would most likely involve Engineering and Police staff coordination to investigate viable actions that could be taken. If the neighborhood agrees to the implementation of 2 -hour parking time limits (as a first step to a residential parking permit program), the matter will need to go before City Council for approval before staff can continue with the next steps to implementing the RPPP on this portion of Crescent Avenue. Page 2 of 2 S:\A Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2012\2-09-12 SR -7.1 Crescent Permit Parking.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tel:(650) 558-7230 Fax:(650) 685-9310 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 CORPORATION YARD Tel:(650) 558-7670 TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 p.m., Thursday, February 9, 2012 City Hall, Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission will be evaluating a request to consider a residential parking permit program for the 200 block of Crescent Avenue. To consider the permit program for the street, a 2 -hr parking time limit will also need to be implemented. The Commission is seeking input and comments from the residents before making any recommendations for action. This matter will be discussed during the next Traffic Commission meeting on Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Council Chambers. Your att endance is encouraged as the Commission welcomes residential input on this important issue. If you are unable to attend this meeting, you may submit your written comments by postal mail to Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010 or submit an email message to Mr. Augustine Chou, Burlingame Transportation Engineer, at achou(Dburlingame.org. All written comments should be received by 5:00 p.m., Feb. 9, 2012, and will be forwarded to the Commission. If you have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please call 650-558-7230. NOTICE - PUBLIC MEETING 2 -HOUR PARKING LIMIT & RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM ON CRESCENT AVENUE TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 p.m., Thursday, February 9, 2012 City Hall, Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission will be evaluating a request to consider a residential parking permit program for the 200 block of Crescent Avenue. To consider the permit program for the street, a 2 -hr parking time limit will also need to be implemented. The Commission is seeking input and comments from the residents before making any recommendations for action. This matter will be discussed during the next Traffic Commission meeting on Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Council Chambers. Your att endance is encouraged as the Commission welcomes residential input on this important issue. If you are unable to attend this meeting, you may submit your written comments by postal mail to Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010 or submit an email message to Mr. Augustine Chou, Burlingame Transportation Engineer, at achou(Dburlingame.org. All written comments should be received by 5:00 p.m., Feb. 9, 2012, and will be forwarded to the Commission. If you have any questions or need additional information about this notice, please call 650-558-7230. EXHIBIT 7.1 -LOCATION MAP D Q' Q PROPOSED AREA E_ r `SS \'DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS EXISTING QP 2=HOUR PARKING VF CURRENT BUSINESS -ITEM 7.2 Meeting STAFF REPORT Date: Februarv9,2012 AGENDA ITEM 71 TO: Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission DATE: February 2, 2012 FROM: Augustine Chou, Transportation Engineer ie SUBJECT: Item 7.2 — Downtown Parking Improvements & Parking Rate Changes on Burlingame Avenue Downtown District RECOMMENDATION: For the Commission to make a final recommendation to Council regarding Burlingame Avenue downtown parking improvements and parking meter rate changes. DISCUSSION: At the January 19, 2012 special meeting of the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission, the Commission saw a presentation regarding Burlingame Avenue downtown infrastructure improvements and parking rate modifications. The Commission looked at occupancy rates, infrastructure needs, parking needs, and revenue options in order to address funding for all the above needs. Six revenue "options' were discussed (A through F). Each revenue option was a variation of time limits and meter rate increases with varying amounts of projected revenue. The Commission evaluated the revenue options, received public comment, and heard from members of the Burlingame Downtown Business Improvement District (DBID). After all the discussions, the Commission recommended Option C as a preferred option to pursue further as a basis for downtown planning parking and revenue improvements. Along with Option C, the following other actions were also recommended. • Increase parking meter hours from 10 -hours to 12 -hours • Implement smart meters on the entire core area • Implement dynamic signage and improve way -finding • Have the DBID, TSPC and ultimately, City Council review the rate plan quarterly • Option C Meter Rate Plan o Tiered rate on Burlingame Avenue ($1 first hour/$2 second hour) o $1 /hr for all other 14 hr meters in core area o $0.30/hr for all 9 -hr and 10 -hr meters in core area o $3/day at all long-term lots On February 2, 2012 staff had a follow up meeting with DBID members to fine-tune the elements of the TSPC recommendation. The meeting was used as a way for the City and business community to work out details that could not be anticipated before a specific recommendation was selected. It also served as another chance for the business community, some who were not able to attend the special meeting, to ask detailed questions or present additional concerns that might need to be addressed with the recommendation. One key addition was the consideration to convert City Lot K (behind Walgreens, Panda Express, and Safeway) from 10 -hour, long-term parking to 2 -hour and 4 -hour parking. Staff believes that with overall changes to the parking needs and uses in the area, the conversion would be something that would help the downtown parking situation. The proposed conversion could also help the parking revenue situation, Page 1 of 2 SAA Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2012\2-09-12 SR -7.2 Downtown Parking &Rate Change.doc as there could be increased collections for shorter termed parking in the lot. Any concerns over long- term parking displacement from Lot K could be addressed with the proposed way -finding improvements in the original recommendation. These improvements could redirect displaced long-term parkers currently in Lot K to other long-term lots in the peripheral areas. The February 2 meeting succeeded in obtaining the DBID membersfinal concurrence with the preferred/recommended option, as well as providing staff with some modifications or additions to the original TSPC recommendation. This final meeting and discussion to the Commission will serve as the last step in the public process before this item is brought to City Council on February 21, 2012, Page 2 of 2 S:Vi Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Staff Reports\2012\2-09-12 SR -7.2 Downtown Parking &Rate Change.doc EXHIBIT 7.2 -CORRESPONDENCE Page 1 of 1 PW/ENG-Chou, Augustine From: PW/ENG-Chou, Augustine Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:49 PM To: CD/PLG-Love, Patricia Cc: PW/ENG-Murtuza, Syed Subject: Parking Rates -DBID &Restaurant Meeting Patricia, Based on my notes from the meeting this morning, the following items are what I understand to be points of concurrence from the DBID and restaurant community. Also, it seems apparent that all the concerns the business community have (more parking time, use of smart meters, better signage) would all be addressed by the items of concurrence below. So, the following items. are what we will be bringing before TSPC next Thursday evening. It is our intent to get a final recommendation from the Commission on these specifics so that we may bring a comprehensive plan to Council on February 21. Extend the parking meter times from 10 -hours (8AM to 6PM) to 12 -hours (8AM to 8PM) . Increase the parking time limit on Burlingame Avenue from 1 -hour to 2 -hour parking • Maintain existing time limits on all other streets within district core • Install smart meters (able to accept coin and credit cards) on entire core area o Use space/stall sensors on the Avenue only; or, o Use space/stall sensors throughout core • Implement "tiered" parking meter rates on Burlingame Avenue only o $1 for first hour/$2 for second hour on the Avenue o $1/hr for all other 1 -4 -hr meters in core o $0.30/hr for all 9-10 hour meters o $3/day for all long-term lots • Implement dynamic/improved signage and way -finding o Parking information/map kiosks linked to streetscape design o Better way -finding &directional signs o Better parking lot identification • Implement streetscape improvements • Infrastructure improvements to parking lots • Evaluate conversion of long-term parking in Lot K into short-term parking (2 -hour and 4 -hour parking) Finally, I am also glad to see that we were able to convey to the DBID members and business community, that there is a direct link between what they would like to see in terms of parking improvements and the meter rate changes needed for the improvements to be a reality. Regards, Augustine Chou -Transportation Engineer Public Works -Engineering Division City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road (650) 558-7236 2/2/2012