Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2007.04.02 �CITY Cb SURUNGAME m o �9wicu we` BURLINGAME CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Monday April 2, 2007 CLOSED SESSION - 6:45 p.m. Conference Room A a. Claim of Joseph Zuffi 1. CALL TO ORDER—7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—Regular Council Meeting of March 19, 2007 & Joint Council and Planning Commission Meeting of March 24, 2007 5. PRESENTATION a. Best of Burlingame Presentation b. Public Works Key Indicators 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Adopt Ordinance to designate 2 hour parking at 1361 N. Carolan Avenue (Public Works Corporation Yard) 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Resolution Ordering and Calling a General Municipal Election to be held November 6, 2007 APPROVE b. Introduce an Ordinance for revisions to fees for water service (water services and meter installations) -INTRODUCE 9. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR 1 a. Final condominium map—Resubdivision of Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 4, Map of Easton Addition No. 1 Subdivision, 1137-1145 Paloma Avenue b. Resolution supporting Senate Bill (SB) 613, Reauthorization of the $4 Vehicle Fee for San Mateo County Area to Fund Traffic Congestion Relief and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs APPROVE C. Request to serve alcohol at Reception for Mary Badham in City Hall Lobby d. Request of City Librarian to attend conference in Washington, D. C. e. Approval of Resolution authorizing investment of proceeds of the 2007 Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) f. Increase the maximum charge allowed for valet parking 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 12. OLD BUSINESS a. State Lands Update b. CalTrain and El Camino Trees c. Council Goals 13. NEW BUSINESS 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library Board of Trustees, February 20, 2007; Parks&Recreation, March 15, 2007; Planning, March 26, 2007 b. Department Reports: Police, February, 2007; Library, March 9, 2007 15. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlin ag me.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2007 2 CITY G BURLINGAME A JUN[6. BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of March 19, 2007 STUDY SESSION a. POLICE ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES COP Van Etten provided an update of police enforcement priorities. He stated that additional staffing for other programs such as additional traffic motor enforcement, community policing, and bicycle patrol would require a strategic plan costing approximately$25,000 to $30,000. 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Terry Nagel called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Sue Glick. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 5, 2007 regular Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PRESENTATIONS a. BEST OF BURLINGAME AWARD Mayor Nagel presented Burlingame resident Solomon Li, a junior at Burlingame High School, with the Best of Burlingame Award. Solomon is the only student who serves on the Friends of Mills Canyon board. Recently, he signed up 59 high school student volunteers to help maintain Mills Canyon. He is president of his school's Ecology Club and is a member of the Student Health Committee, the Interact Club and Service Commission; and Solomon has devoted more than 200 hours to community service. b. PROCLAMATION FOR DOMINIC DAVINO, ONE OF THE STATE'S TOP FIVE FREE THROW BASKETBALL HOOP SHOOTERS IN THE 12 TO 13 YEAR OLD AGE GROUP 1 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Nagel presented Burlingame resident Dominic Davino with a proclamation honoring his achievement as one of the state's top five free throw basketball hoop shooters in the 12 to 13 year old age group. C. KEY INDICATORS FOR FINANCE FinDir Nava provided an overview of the Finance Department's key performance indicators. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION DENIAL TO REMOVE TWO REDWOOD TREES AT 2022 TROUSDALE DRIVE P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and take action. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. Walter Reed, owner of 2022 Trousdale Drive, answered Council's questions. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Council recommended that the owner prune and thin the trees to allow more natural light into the owner's home since this was the owner's main concern. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to uphold the Beautification Commission decision to deny removal of two Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale Drive and to deny the application; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. PUBLIC HEARING AND RESOLUTION NO. 21-2007 INCREASING THE 2007 SOLID WASTE RATES BY FIVE PERCENT (5%) FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 21-2007 increasing all solid waste rates by 5%. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 21-2007, authorizing Allied Waste Services (formerly BFI) to increase rates for refuse collection services; seconded by Councilwoman ' Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. C. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1803 TO AMEND THE CONTRACT WITH THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CaIPERS) AND THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TO PROVIDE SECTION 21548 (PRE-RETIREMENT OPTIONAL SETTLEMENT 2 DEATH BENEFIT) FOR LOCAL MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES HRD Dolan reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No. 1803 amending the Ca1PERS contract to provide pre-retirement optional death benefits for local miscellaneous employees. Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. 2 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1803 authorizing amendment to the contract between the City of Burlingame and Ca1PERS to provide pre-retirement optional settlement 2 death benefit to miscellaneous members; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater Avenue, spoke on trees removed by Caltrans on El Camino Real. There were no further comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE 2-HOUR PARKING AT 1361 N. CAROLAN AVNEUE (PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION YARD DPW Bagdon reviewed the staff report and requested Council to introduce an ordinance to implement 2-hour parking for three spaces in front of 1361 North Carolan Avenue. Mayor Nagel requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance establishing two-hour parking limit for three parking spaces in front of 1361 North Carolan Avenue. Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION: BROADWAY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SETTING 2007-08 ASSESSMENTS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve the Broadway Business Improvement District (BID) Annual Report for FY 2006/07, the Resolution of Intention to levy assessments for FY 2007/08, and to set a public hearing for Monday, April 16, 2007, at 7 p.m. Ross Bruce, Broadway BID President, introduced David Hinckle of the Broadway BID who presented the 2006/07 Annual Report. Mr. Hinckle stated that although the Shuttle Contribution shows no payment, the check currently is being processed by their Finance Department. Mr. Hinckle responded to Council's questions. Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve the Broadway BID 2006/07 Annual Report; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 22-2007, Resolution of Intention to establish 2007/08 assessments for the Broadway Area Business Improvement District and approving 2006/07 Annual Report; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel directed the City Clerk to publish Resolution No. 22-2007. 3 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes C. APPROVAL FOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ART & JAZZ FESTIVAL,AUGUST 11-12, 2007 CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and requested Council to approve the Chamber of Commerce Art& Jazz Festival on August 11 and 12, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. each day. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to approve the Chamber of Commerce Art & Jazz Festival to be held on August 11 and 12, 2007; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION NO. 23-2007 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CALIFORNIA/OAK GROVE AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION PROJECT, PHASE I DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 23-2007 authorizing execution of agreement for professional services contract with BKF Engineers for design of California and Oak Grove Area Sewer Improvement and Rehabilitation Project, Phase 1. b. RESOLUTION NO. 24-2007 ACCEPTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CO— GENERATION PROJECT DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 24-2007 accepting improvements for Wastewater Treatment Plant Co-Generation Project by California Power Partners Company. C. WARRANTS & PAYROLL FinDir Nava requested approval for payment of Warrants#23936-24397 duly audited, in the amount of $2,499,724.52 (excluding Library checks #23936-23957); Payroll checks #167887-168106 in the amount of $2,279,076.78 for the month of February 2007. Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bobbi Benson, 550 El Camino Real, spoke on public art in Burlingame. Jeff Carter, 1720 Adeline Drive, spoke on Caltrain. There were no further comments from the floor. 12. OLD BUSINESS Mayor Nagel rearranged the order of Old Business items at staff's request. c. STATUS OF CITYWIDE CLEAN UP 4 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes FinDir Nava requested Council direction for scheduling a two-day electronic waste recycling event either the weekend of June 9 and 10 or June 16 and 17. Universal Waste Systems would provide all marketing materials for the event. Council agreed on the weekend dates of June 16 and 17, 2007, for this event. b. DISCUSS FEEDBACK ON CALTRAIN RESOLUTION NO. 18-2007 APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT THE MARCH 5, 2007 MEETING Mayor Nagel stated that the resolution is asking Caltrain to revisit their schedule with an outside third party to look at possibilities in making slight modifications to their schedule that would perhaps rearrange some stops or add some stops to encourage more riders to use public transit. During Council discussion, Vice Mayor O'Mahony expressed concern that some of the resolution"whereas" statements appear to be ambiguous. Mayor Nagel stated that the resolution's action clauses are not ambiguous and directed the City Clerk to send a copy of Resolution No. 18-2007 to Caltrain. a. STATUS OF RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS COP Van Etten reported that they are looking at various areas of Burlingame to be considered for a new residential parking permit program. CM Nantell stated that, in addition, staff is planning to recommend elimination of the current overnight parking restrictions. One difficulty is addressing parking for multiple dwellers in single family areas. d. POLICE ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES—FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION Councilman Cohen asked whether Council direction should be provided on additional police staffing for other programs as presented during today's Study Session. Mayor Nagel suggested going with COP Van Etten's recommendation. 13. NEW BUSINESS CP Monroe stated that the Joint Council and Planning Commission meeting is on Saturday, March 24, at the Corporation Yard between 9 a.m. and 12 p.m. Mayor Nagel stated that there is a Town Hall meeting with PG&E in the Library's Lane Room at 7 p.m. on March 27. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Parks &Recreation, February 15, 2007; Beautification, March 1, 2007; Planning, March 12, 2007 b. Department Reports: Building, February 2007; Finance, February 2007 5 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes 15. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Nagel adjourned the meeting at 9:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 6 Burlingame City Council March 19,2007 Unapproved Minutes CITY OF BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Public Works Corporation Yard Training Room 1361 North Carolan Avenue March 24, 2007 I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Terry Nagel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Present: Council members: Mayor Nagel, Vice-Mayor O'Mahony, Baylock, Cohen, Keighran. Commissioners: Chair Brownrigg, Auran, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Terrones, Vistica Staff. City Manager, Jim Nantell; City Planner, Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; Bill Meeker. II. DISCUSS THE COUNCIL'S FY 2006-2007 GOALS FOR PLANNING AND SET FY 2006-2007 WORK PROGRAM Council members, Planning Commissioners and staff discussed the various items suggested for discussion by the Council in the staff report. These included: over view of the accomplishments of the Planning Commission and Department in FY 2006-2007 with identification of the projects not gotten to; a `go green' strategy; and regulatory and processing issues including second hand smoke in multiple family dwellings, use of wood burning fireplaces, infill development, design review in the R-2, R-3 and R-4 zones, and ways to organize to address potential problems and facilitate processing projects, particularly those in existing buildings. As a group the Council members and Planning Commissioners discussed each item. At public comment the following members of the public spoke: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Kate O'Brien; Susan Castner-Paine; Matt Campagna. Following the public comment the group prioritized the issues identified, including those carried over from FY 2006-2007, into three categories: those to begin work on immediately, those to try to work into the program for the year; and those to reconsider for another year. First priority projects • Downtown Specific Plan: Preparation of the Downtown Specific Plan • Go Green Task Force: Establish a"Go Green"task force of Council and Commission members to inventory current green and sustainable practices CITY OF BURLINGAME JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING UNAPPROVED MINUTES March 24,2007 and evaluate additional appropriate measures to undertake in FY 2007- 2008. • Infill Development: Planning Commission review the current regulations which apply to infill development and develop a policy and proposed regulations to insure `no net loss' of residential units when new projects are proposed. • Design Review for Duplex and Multiple Family Development: Planning Commission develop design criteria and amendment to the zoning regulations for the R-2 (duplex) and R-3 and R-4 (multiple family) zoning districts. • Regulations for Existing Buildings: Based on the objective to balance meeting life-safety requirements and to encourage the retention of existing buildings, particularly in the commercial areas, development staff led by Planning staff should review current regulations in terms of their impacts on building retention and discuss with the City Council and Planning Commission the findings. Any streamlining or adjustments would be determined after review and discussion. The Council and Commission members identified five items which, if there is time, should be addressed as well. Second Priority Projects • Housing Element Update: Initiate work on the 2009 Housing Element Update. • Revise Condominium Regulations: Update and revise the Residential and Commercial Condominium requirements, this might also include provisions to address `no net loss' of residential units and isolation of individual unit exhaust systems. • Update Inclusionary Housing Zoning Requirements: Complete the revision of the inclusionary zoning requirements to address changes in state law. • Zoning for 2001 Housing Element Implementation: Complete the Work Program of the 2001 Housing Element, place an overlay zone in the Rollins Road/Carolan Avenue area. • Business Ambassador Program: Work with Council to develop a Business Ambassador Program to facilitate and assist small businesses and developers through the approval and construction processes. One issue the group decided to defer, the regulation of wood burning fire places, because the Regional Air Quality Control Board has taken the lead on this issue. III. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Nagel at 12:20 p.m. 2 of Buringg BURUNGAME Stephen Hamilton J IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED ONE OF THE �JU • A FOR PROVIDING OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE pill �hjjam .-A 1, e e LAW T nRRY NAca.MAYOR °f But C1�� g4 ,/mum BURLINGAME Fiona Hamilton 1 IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED ONE OF THE r FOR PROVIDING OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE RRRY NAca,MAYOR Public Works Dept. Performance Measures Key Indicators and Major Accomplishments af; a ,. Building Plan Checks Completed within 15 Days Actual 99% Goat 95% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% t00% FY -. s !, > o0 S- o O L c O o 00 { az m m V/ W 111 L � f lL (Q U O w .. a+ f4 Q � N On 8'vy p e Building Major Accomplishments ■ Conducted two community meetings to gain feedback ■ Customer service IT improvements- - Appointment window .. reduced from 4 hours to }" 1 '/2 hours - Inspector appointments h can be scheduled 4 days in advance instead of 2 days in advance. - Allow gas hook-ups during construction Engineering } Limit Construction Change Orders to 10% of the CIP Project Cost Actual 100% Goa 1 80% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 15 Completed Construction Projects.FY 2006-07 ig dilli (f Yti 1 L N m 00 ILO LO tD � m f 'F _ Im 0 O Ia- CU U W o ' LU s x o . _iJ 1000 t c� ,r y Engineering Major Accomplishments ■ Implemented education and outreach program `' for Measure H fi ■ Successfully negotiated scop work for Burling Train Station Pr and Safety Fen �Obte S Project ■ Constructed Transportation Grant funded pr'Pj 'ects Lighted Crosswalk Streets/Storm Drainage � ra Good or Better Ratings on Customer Surveys Actual 100% Goal 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Streets/Storm Drainage j. f Initial Response Time (minutes) to Street Cleanup and Repair Requests Actual 23 Goa 1 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 205 Est.FY 2006-07 7.T, 171 1 s. Streets/Storm Drainage Initial Response to Pothole Complaints within 24 hours Actual 100% ' Goal 80% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 17 Est FY 2006-07 Streets/Storm Drainage Major Accomplishments Made emergency repairs to mudslide in Mills Canyon } Cleaned City's creek and storm channels x Swept 7,500 miles of street and cleaned 1 ,600 catch basins Sewer/Treatment Plant Initial Response Time (minutes) to Sewer Service Calls Actual ` 22 Goa 1 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 a MUM n A .r' Sewer/Treatment Plant Number of Sewer Service Calls 3950 4000 3750 3500 3250 3000 2750 2500 1? 8. 2250 2000 1750 1500 1 1250 1000 673 750 500 250 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 t Sewer/Treatment Plant Good or Better Ratings on Customer Surveys 9 Y Actual 100% Goal 90% 0% o 60% 80% 100% s Owl, U) N a o 0 4-a 'D tz o i ,.fl _ CU cu U Q � G Q� N (D (Dojo � (I) 3: E Q (D — o � O 0 � 0 a � c) —L Q � i Fleet Maintenance Y Services and Minor Repairs Completed within One Working Day Actual 95% 95%� Goa 1 95% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 427 Est.FY 2006-07 Fleet Maintenance Preventive Maintenance Checks Completed within the Month Due Actual 90% Goal A 90% 20% 409'% 60% 80',4 100'.. 886 Est.FY 2006-07 � � M 1 Fleet Maintenance Major Accomplishments ■ Purchased 12 vehicles including 2 �� � hybrid vehicles ■ Serviced 165 vehicles a" including 40 from Hillsborough Water Water Service Installation Requests Completed within 10 Working Days Actual 98% Goa 1 95% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 50 Est FY 2006-07 v � s t y Water Initial Response Time (minutes) to Water Service Calls Actual 22 Goal 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2200 Est FY 2006-07 it r. Water Good or Better Rating on Customer Surveys Actual 100% Goa 1 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%, 11111111 wt c E - r Water f` Major Accomplishments ■ Structurally reinforced Mills Reservoir serving ` the hillside communit ■ Replaced 1 ,050 L meters which is 11% of total city meters ■ All personnel are .� certified by Department = ` of Health Services to a, operate water system §` Facilities Maintenance Help Desk Tickets Completed within 3 Days Actua 1 74% Goa 1 70% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 512 Est.FY 2006-07 i(�of Burlingame Facilities Maintenance Pov-.Rh b�P.�fv�Turk r Facilities Maintenance Good or Better Rating on Customer Surveys Actual 99% Goa 1 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% t g}1 1 u Facilities Maintenance Major Accomplishments J P ■ Reduced street light burn outs from eight to three - per week and replaced bulbs within 24 hours :-ceun■w earrta nut ra urc wana a rui BALL STRIKE OUT y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 TOTAL . HOME VVC1 4J QuestioJO f BURLINGAMMW E ` nMajor Accomplishments 15 Agenda / Item# lD 6L. Meeting B"R""G�''"� STAFF REPORT Date: A .I 2 zoos SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY 1t TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 20, 2007 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE 2-HOUR PARKING AT 1361 N. CAROLAN AVENUE (PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION YARD) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing to: A. Adopt proposed ordinance. B. Direct City clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. BACKGROUND: Prior to December 2006, the Burlingame Public Works Corporation Yard used on-street parking to accommodate both employee and guest parking for the facility. In October 2006, the City exercised its option to demolish the adjacent building and convert it to much-needed employee parking. The new fenced lot is used for employee and city construction vehicle parking. In order to address the lack of visitor parking, the Public Works Department is requesting the designation of three on-street parking spaces in front of the Corporation Yard as 2-hour parking for visitors and other short-term parkers. DISCUSSION: The on-street parking both in front of the Corporation Yard, as well as the rest of North Carolan Avenue currently has unlimited time parking and is being used by businesses on the street. Based upon field investigations, staff has determined that there are no short-term parking spaces available on North Carolan Avenue. The designation of short-term, on-street parking spaces would be a benefit to the Corporation Yard and to the auto businesses in the immediate vicinity. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Corp Yard 2-hr Parking Adopt.doc In the future, staff will investigate the possibility of designating additional on-street spaces farther down the street to serve as short-term parking for vendors. BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in the Public Works Department operating budget to implement and maintain the proposed change. EXHIBITS: Ordinance Aug stine Chou Traffic Engineer SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Corp Yard 2-hr Parking Adopt.doc I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING TWO-HOUR PARKING LIMIT FOR THREE PARKING SPACES IN 3 FRONT OF 1361 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1 . The North Carolan neighborhood is a mix of uses, including automobile 8 service, supply stores, warehousing, public facilities, and manufacturing. Parking in the area has 9 been unlimited, which means that visitors and customers of the businesses and public buildings 10 have great difficulty finding on-street parking during the work day. This ordinance is intended to 11 provide three short-term parking spaces in front of City buildings so that the City facility and 12 neighboring businesses will have some on-street parking available on a limited basis. 13 14 Section 2. Subsection 13.36.040(a) is amended to read as follows: 15 (a) 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.: 16 (1) Adrian Road, west side, one hundred fifty-five (155) feet southerly from the southeast 17 end of the curb return of David Road. 18 (2) Anita Road, west side, from Peninsula Avenue one hundred and forty-five (145) feet 19 north toward Bayswater Avenue; 20 (3) Bayswater Avenue from El Camino Real to Park Road; south side, from California 21 Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; 22 (4) Bellevue Avenue, except the south side from Primrose Road to Almer Road; 23 (5) Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side from Occidental to 24 El Camino Real; 25 (6) California Drive, west side, from Carmelite Avenue to Palm Drive; from Burlingame 26 Avenue to Peninsula Avenue; from Oak Grove Avenue four hundred (400) feet northwards to 755 27 California Drive, except areas designated for thirty (30) minute parking; --)8 (7) Capuchino Avenue from four hundred (400) feet southerly to four hundred ninety-five 1 1 (495) feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; 2 (8) Carmelita Avenue, south side, from El Camino Real to Chula Vista Avenue; 3 (9) Carolan Avenue,west side,from Oak Grove Avenue to Burlingame Avenue;east side, 4 from one hundred (100) feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty (460) feet northerly 5 of Toyon Drive; and east side, from Cadillac Way to Broadway; 6 (10) Chapin Avenue, from Chapin Lane to El Camino Real; 7 (11) Chula Vista Avenue from the centerline of Broadway to four hundred ten feet(410) 8 southerly of the centerline of Broadway; 9 (12)Douglas Avenue; 10 (13)East Lane, east side, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue; 11 (14) El Camino Real service road between Dufferin Avenue and Murchison Drive; 12 (15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from 13 California Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; 14 (16)Laguna Avenue from two hundred eighty feet(280)southerly to five hundred ten(5 10) 15 feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; 16 (17)Lorton Avenue,west side,from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue;east side,from 17 Howard Avenue one hundred twenty(120)feet south toward Bayswater and forty(40) feet north 18 toward Burlingame Avenue; 19 (18) Magnolia, west side, from Trousdale Drive to Plaza Lane; 20 (19)North Carolan Avenue with three(3)parking spaces along the lot front of 1361 North 21 Carolan Avenue; 22 (20) Occidental Avenue, from El Camino Real to Ralston Avenue; 23 (21)Paloma Avenue from three hundred ten(3 10)feet southerly to one hundred thirty(130) 24 feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway; 25 (22) Park Road, except the west side, from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue; 26 (23) Primrose Road, west side, from Howard Avenue to El Camino Real; 27 (24) Ralston Avenue, from Occidental Avenue to El Camino Real; 28 (25)Rollins Road from ninety(90)feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet 2 1 (460) northerly of Toyon Drive; 2 (26) South Lane, both sides; 3 (27) Trousdale Drive, north side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive and California 4 Drive to ninety(90) feet west of said curb return. 5 6 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 7 8 Mayor 9 10 I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 11 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19`'day 12 of March, 2007, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13 day of , 2007, by the following vote: 14 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 15 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 16 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 17 City Clerk 18 UIFILES\0RDINANC\PARKZ0N7.wpd 19 20 21 2? 23) 24 25 26 27 28 CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 84"' w�o4 9oa MTG. °ogq,Eo E� DATE 4/2/07 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY '4 DATE: March 21, 2007 APPROVED FROM: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk By /(J 650-558-7203 SUBJECT: Resolution Ordering and Calling a General Municipal Election to be held November 6, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: To approve the attached resolution ordering and calling a general municipal election to be held in the City of Burlingame on November 6, 2007, requesting the services of the Registrar of Voters, requesting consolidation of elections, and specifying certain procedures for the consolidated election, requiring payment of prorated costs of candidates' statements, and providing for giving notice of election. BACKGROUND: In November of odd-numbered years the City of Burlingame holds an election. This year two council terms expire in November. The incumbents are Mayor Nagel and Councilman Cohen. The filing period for nomination papers and candidate statements is from July 16 to August 10, 2007, EXHIBIT: Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: As of March 15, 2007, there are 15,702 registered voters in the City of Burlingame. Since the November 6, 2007 election is consolidated with other jurisdictions,the San Mateo County Election Office has recommended a cost estimate of$2 per registered voter. Total budget impact is estimated at $.,34,500. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ORDERING AND CALLING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ON NOVEMBER 6, 2007; REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS, REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF ELECTIONS, AND SPECIFYING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR THE CONSOLIDATED ELECTION; REQUIRING PAYMENT OF PRORATED COSTS OF CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR GIVING NOTICE OF ELECTION RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, Burlingame Ordinance No. 1219 provides that the general municipal election for the City of Burlingame shall be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd-numbered year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 10 of the California Elections Code, a general municipal election may be consolidated with an election in another public district; and WHEREAS, elections in public districts will be held on November 6, 2007, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. A general municipal election is hereby called to be held in and for the City of Burlingame on Tuesday,November 6, 2007, to elect two (2) Council Members, each for a full term of four(4) years. 2. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the City Council hereby requests the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo to make available the services of the County Clerk as County Elections Official for the purpose of performing the usual services necessary in the conduct of the consolidated general municipal election, including the provision of election supplies and voters' pamphlets. 3. Pursuant to the Elections Code commencing with Section 10400, the City Council hereby requests the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo to order the consolidation of the general municipal election to be conducted within the boundaries of the City of Burlingame on November 6, 2007, with respect to which the Board of Supervisors of the County 1 of San Mateo has the power to order a consolidation. The City Council further consents to and orders the consolidation of the general municipal election hereby called with the elections in public districts to be held the same day. Upon consolidation ,the consolidated election shall be held and conducted, election officers appointed, voting precincts designated, ballots printed, polls opened at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., ballots counted and returned, returns canvassed, and all other proceedings in connection with the election shall be regulated and done by the County Clerk of the County of San Mateo in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the elections so consolidated. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of the general municipal election within the time and in the manner specified in Elections Code Section 12101. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to do all other things required by law to hold the general municipal election above provided. 5. Pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code,the City Council hereby determines to levy against each candidate availing himself or herself of the service of including a candidate's statement not to exceed two hundred (200) words in length in the voters' pamphlets, the actual prorated costs of printing, handling, and translating the candidates statement incurred by the City of Burlingame. The City Clerk shall provide written notice to such effect with each set of nomination papers issued and shall require payment of the estimated pro rated share at the time the candidate statement is filed. 6. Pursuant to Section 10228 of the Elections Code and Burlingame Municipal Code section 2.20.020, the filing fee for the processing of the nomination papers by the City is $25.00. 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and to transmit a certified copy to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo and to the County Clerk of the County of San Mateo. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK U:\FILES\Elections\ELECTCALL2007.RES.wpd 3 Agenda Item # Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: AiDrill 2007 In -t A� SUBMITTED BY APPROVED B`( TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 26, 2007 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE FOR REVISIONS TO FEES FOR WATER SERVICE (WATER SERVICES AND METER INSTALLATIONS) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council begin adoption of the attached ordinance for the revisions to water service fees by: a. Requesting City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. b. Waiving further reading of the ordinance. c. Introducing the proposed ordinance. d. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. DISCUSSION: The current fees for water services and meter installations have not been updated in the last two years. The ordinance revises the fees to achieve full cost recovery for all labor and materials as indicated on the Cost Detail attachment. The proposed Burlingame fees are the lowest as compared to four neighboring jurisdictions. EXHIBITS: Ordinance, Cost Detail BUDGET IMPACT: This ordinance will not affect the operating budget as the costs incurred will be offset by the revenues received from water services and meter installations. c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance Director I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING REVISIONS TO INSTALLATION FEES FOR WATER SERVICE 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 6 Section 1. The existing installation fees were affirmed in Ordinance No. 1784 adopted in 7 May 2006,which did not increase the fees established in Ordinance No. 1754 adopted in June,2005. 8 The costs of installation have increased due to labor, equipment, and material cost increases. The 9 fees adopted in this ordinance are not discriminatory or excessive. 10 11 Section 2. Subsection 6(h) of Ordinance No. 1784 (2006) is amended to read as follows: 12 (h) All domestic water service installations of sizes 3/4" to 2", inclusive, consisting of 13 corporation and curb cocks,service line,meter boxes and meters,may be furnished and installed by 14 the city from the water main to a point approximately one foot inside the curb line, or to a point 15 within 4'of the property being served from a water main in an easement,alley or other right-of-way 16 other than dedicated street, but not exceeding a total distance from water main connection to the 17 meter box of sixty feet (60') for the following fixed fees: 18 5/8" bypass meter............................. $350 19 3/4" service with meter.................... $3,806 $4,100.00 20 1" service with meter....................... $3,840 $4,135.00 21 1-1/2" service with meter................ $4,580 $5,280.00 22 2" service with meter...................... $4•,7}0 $5,420.00 23 All domestic water service installations of a size larger than two inches (2") or longer than 24 sixty feet(60')or not covered by the circumstances described above may be furnished and installed 25 by the city for the cost of labor and material, plus a sum equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the 26 combined cost of labor and material, less a credit for any existing water meter. The sum to be paid 27 for any such installations shall be estimated by the public works department, and such sum shall be 28 deposited with the department before the work of installation commences. In the event that the 3/26/2007 I estimated cost of making the installation proves to be insufficient to pay for said installation as 2 hereinabove provided,an additional sum sufficient to pay such costs shall be charged. If the amount 3 deposited exceeds the cost of installation as hereinabove provided, the excess shall be refunded. 4 5 Section 3. Subsection 6(i)to Ordinance No. 1784 (2006)is added to read as follows: 6 (i) An upgrade from a smaller meter to a larger meter shall be charged as follows: 7 To 3/4" meter 52+6 $223.00 8 To 1" meter 5-24-5 $254.00 9 10 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 11 12 Mayor 13 14 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day 15 of ,2007,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2007, by the following vote: 16 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 17 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 18 19 City Clerk 20 U:\F1LES\Water\2007fees.pwd.wpd 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2 - 3/26/2007 Cost Detail Installation of a new 3/4" service and meter (Current Fee: $3,800) Labor Cost $2,285.28 Material Cost * $747.17 Equipment cost $1,068.00 Total $4,100.45 Proposed Fee $4,100.00 Installation of a new 1" service and meter (Current Fee: $3,840) Labor Cost $2,285.28 Material Cost * $782.17 Equipment cost $1,068.00 Total $4,135.45 Proposed Fee $4,135.00 Installation of a new 1 1/2" service and meter (Current Fee: $4,580) Labor Cost $2,285.28 Material Cost * $1,930.91 Equipment cost $1,068.00 Total $5,284.19 Proposed Fee $5,280.00 Installation of a new 2" service and meter (Current Fee: $4,710) Labor Cost $2,285.28 Material Cost * $2,065.91 Equipment cost $1,068.00 Total $5,419.19 Proposed Fee $5,420.00 3/4" Meter Upgrade (Current Fee: $210) New Meter Cost $132.00 1 hr Labor $64.77 1 hr for Truck $27.00 Total $223.77 Proposed Fee $223.00 1" Meter Upgrade (Current Fee: $245) New Meter Cost $162.37 1 hr Labor $64.77 1 hr for Truck $27.00 Total $254.14 Proposed Fee $254.00 A key factor for the fee adjustment is the increased cost of copper and brass materials SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Water Fee Cost DetailAs Agenda Item # ' 0— Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: April 22007 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 23, 2007 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAP - RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 4, MAP OF EASTON ADDITION NO. 1 SUBDIVISION, 1137-1145 PALOMA AVENUE, PM 00-06 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve this map subject to the following: 1 . All sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter shall be replaced as new. 2. All conditions attached to the condominium permit shall be met. 3. The conditions, covenants and restrictions for this map must be approved by the City Attorney and conform to all approval conditions and City codes. BACKGROUND: The tentative condominium map was approved by City Council on June 2, 2003. Staff has reviewed the final condominium mar) and recommends approval subject to the above conditions. EXHIBITS: Final Condominium Map, June 2, 2003 Staff Report Victor Voong Assistan -Engineer c: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\00-06Condo.doc BURAGENDALINGAME STAFF REPORT ITEM# MTG. 6/02/03 DAT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED --7" /::�� DATE: May 21, 2003 BY APPROVED FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP AND TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION PURPOSES - RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 4, MAP OF EASTON ADDITION NO. 1 - 1137-1145 PALOMA AVENUE - IPM 00-06 RECOMMENDATION: If Council approves the condominium project, the Tentative Map and Tentative and Final Parcel Map should be approved at the same time with the following conditions: • A lot combination map shall be filed prior to issuance of the Building Permit. At least two houses must be demolished. • All sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new. • All conditions attached to the condominium permit shall be met. • The conditions, covenants and restrictions for the map shall be approved by the City Attorney and conform to all approved conditions and City Codes. BACKGROUND: Staff has reviewed this map along with the Condominium Permit. All conditions of the Condominium Permit are included in the Planning Commission memo dated August 12, 2002. Should Council approve this application. The Lot Combination Map should be considered as both the Tentative and Final Parcel Map to facilitate processing. Staff will see that the proper map is recorded. EXHIBITS: Map, Staff Report, Minutes 1"Ial- X/ Z��xl//� Philip B. onaghan, . Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Applicant s:\apublimorkAstaff report\00.06.stf.wpd Agenda b Item # b Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Aril 2, 2007 � r AL- SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: March 23, 2007 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SENATE BILL (SB) 613, REAUTHORIZATION OF THE $4 VEHICLE FEE FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY AREA TO FUND TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the attached resolution supporting SB 613 to reauthorize an assessment of $4 on the motor vehicle fee to fund traffic congestion relief and storm water pollution prevention programs in the San Mateo County area. BACKGROUND: Assembly Bill (AB) 1546 was introduced by the State legislators in 2003 and was approved by the Governor in 2005. AB 1546 authorized an assessment of up to $4 on the motor vehicle fee to support the traffic congestion relief program and to address storm water pollution issues in San Mateo County. AB 1546 has a sunset date of January 1 , 2009. The funding for the traffic congestion relief and storm water pollution prevention program will end unless the bill is extended. DISCUSSION: A new Senate Bill (SB) 613 is being introduced in the State to extend improvements AB 1546 until January 1, 2019. To date, Burlingame has received approximately $46,000 from AB 1546 which has funded street resurfacing projects, traffic signal timing improvements as well as storm water pollution prevention program activities such as catch basin cleaning and street sweeping. If the current program is extended per SB 613, Burlingame is anticipated to receive approximately $633,000 over a twenty year period of the program. Pending Council action, Staff recommends that the Mayor be authorized to sign the attached letter of support to Senator Simitian. Exhibits: Resolution letter requesting support for SB 613. ✓1 / SydrdMurtuza, P'E Assistant Director of Public Works SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\staff report supporting SB 613.doc RESOLUTION RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SENATE BILL(SB)613 REAUTHORIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE FEE FOR TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089.11 ET. SEQ. RESOLVED, by the City of Burlingame of San Mateo County; that, WHEREAS, C/CAG is the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for San Mateo County and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Holder for San Mateo County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65089.11 et. seq. authorizes C/CAG to impose an annual fee of up to $4 on motor vehicles registered within San Mateo County for a program for the management of traffic congestion and stormwater pollution within that County; and WHEREAS,the City of Burlingame found this program to be successful; and WHEREAS,California Government Code Section 65089.11 et. seq. will sunset on January 1, 2009 unless reauthorized. NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City of Burlingame supports the extension of the Dedicated Motor Vehicle Fee for San Mateo County (California Government Code Section 65089.11 et. Seq) to be extended until January 1, 2019 under its current programs. PASSED,APPROVED,AND ADOPTED, THIS 2ND DAY OF April 2007. Signed: Mayor I, Doris Mortensen, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk Alft LIN6AME TERRY NAGEL,MAYOR ROSALIEM.O' AHONV,VICE MAYOR TEL (650558-7200 CATHY BAYLONCK �// Iy FAX:(850) 342-8386 ANN KEIGHRAN —burlingame.org RUSS COHEN CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 April 3,2007 The Honorable Senator Joseph S.Simitian State Capitol-Room 2080 Sacramento,CA 95814 RE:SUPPORT OF C/CAG SPONSORED SENATE BILL(SB)613 Dear Senator Simitian: The City of Burlingame supports the C/CAG sponsored Bill SB 613 that would continue to authorize C/CAG to assess up to$4 in motor vehicle fees. Please see the attached resolution of support. The purpose of the fee is to continue a successful program that funds management activities to reduce congestion to the benefit of the driving motorist. It also provides funding for motor vehicle related programs of the State mandated (unfunded)Countywide Storm water Pollution Prevention Program. The first objective of SB 613 is to maximize the capacity of the current transportation infrastructure through transportation system measures. These measures include ramp metering,employer and local shuttles, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Real Time Information Systems on the freeway, park and ride lots,and advanced accident removal systems with automatic rerouting of traffic.Our City has received funds from this program to address street resurfacing and signal timing. We have a member on C/CAG's Technical Advisory Committee working on countywide programs associated with the broader impacts of congestion in San Mateo County. The second objective is to address the storm water pollution that flows to San Francisco Bay as a result of the debris from motor vehicles.The storm water program is an unfunded State mandate. Some of the programs that it will support include countywide public education,grants to local jurisdictions,countywide monitoring and studies,and training for City and County staffs to meet permit requirements. Page 2.... The Honorable Senator Joseph S. Simitian April 3,2007 This will provide an on-going source of funding for capital and operating expenses for the storm water pollution prevention programs that are mandated under the Clean Water Act but not funded by the State. Burlingame has received funds from this program to address street sweeping, storm water pollution cleaning and storm inlet cleaning. SB 613 will be a financial beneficial to all the Cities and the County. Your carrying this bill is appreciated and we look forward to working with you to gain passage of this important legislation. Please feel free to contact George Bagdon, Public Works Director at(650)558-7230 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Terry Nagel Mayor, City of Burlingame Attachment: Resolution of Support CC: Jim Nantell, City Manager; Syed Murtuza,Assistant Public Works Director CITY 0 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM # BURUNGAME Burlingame Public Library MEETING DATE: -Z-01 m �Fo ,ao /IAT PJUNE6 March 19, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED B FROM: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian APPROVED BY: SUBJECT: Request to serve alcohol at Reception for Mary Badham in City Hall Lobby Recommendation: To approve the serving of alcohol and hors d'oeuvres in the City Hall Lobby immediately following the "Q and A with Scout" event for the BIG READ on the evening of April 24th, 7 PM. Background: The Peninsula Library System was the recipient of a BIG READ grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. The grant was matched by the Silicon Valley Community Foundation and the Kellogg Foundation. The featured work is the 1960 Pulitzer Prize winning classic "To Kill a Mockingbird," by Harper Lee. As part of the reading initiative, the library system will be sponsoring over 40 programs county- wide. Among the programs to be presented in Burlingame are: Opening Reception on Tuesday, April 3rd, Lane Room, 7 PM; Screening and Discussion of the film, "To Kill a Mockingbird" Saturday, April 7th, 2 PM; Screening of the film "Remember the Titans, a film about tolerance on the high school football field, Friday, April 13, 4:30 PM; Screening and Discussion of "The N- word," a documentary featuring the producer Helena Echegoyen, Saturday, April 14, 2 PM; and "Q & A with Scout," a relaxed evening with Mary Badham, the actress who played Scout alongside Gregory Peck in the 1962 film "To Kill a Mockingbird," Tuesday, April 24, 7 PM, Burlingame City Hall Council Chambers. At this final event at Burlingame, we would like to hold a reception with food and champagne immediately following the presentation. We would expect to wrap up the event by 9 PM. Staff would be on hand to monitor the event. Budget Impact: The cost of the program would be underwritten by the grant. CITY 0 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM#-qd- BURLINGAME Burlingame Public Library MEETING DATEA-2-07 g4DD_ Da RANTED JVNE 6 March 19, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED B FROM: Alfred Escoffier, City Librarian APPROVED BY: /�40 SUBJECT: Request to Attend Out of State Conference Recommendation: To approve conference travel for City Librarian to the American Library Association in Washington D.C., June 21-25, 2007 Background: The annual conference of the American Library Association will be held in Washington D.C. June 21-25, 2007. This national conference will feature presentations on reading initiatives, library technology and strategic planning. Conference costs will be underwritten by the Library Board of Trustees. Budget Impact: The Library Board of Trustees has approved payment for the training costs from the Trustees Special Fund at their April 18,2006 meeting. There will be no impact on the city's general fund budget. The total cost (hotel and airline costs) is budgeted at S 1,600.00. CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM# MTG. D�DRATED DYNE 6'9O DATE April 2,2007 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT BY DATE: April 2,2007 APPR VED FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director/Treasurer BY SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF PROCEEDS OF THE 2007 WATER AND WASTER REVENUE BONDS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) Recommendation: That the City Council approve the following resolution: Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Burlingame Authorizing Investment Of Proceeds Of The 2007 Water And Wastewater Revenue Bonds In The State Of California Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) Background: LAIF is an eligible investment under the City of Burlingame Investment Policy. The resolution is required to process the anticipated deposit of bond proceeds into LAIF after the sale of the bonds. The resolution authorizes the City of Burlingame Trust Bank (Bank of New York)to deposit and withdrawal funds as trustee of the City. Resolution 17-2003 (adopted February 3, 2003) designates the city officers authorized to deposit and withdrawal funds needed to make payment on the bond funded projects. Attachments: - The Fund, The Local Agency Investment Fund, California State Treasurers Office, Revised December 31, 2006 - Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Burlingame Authorizing Investment Of Proceeds Of The 2007 Water And Wastewater Revenue Bonds In The State Of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Resolution No. 17-2003. Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Burlingame Authorizing Investment Of Monies In The State Of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) The Fund The Local Agency Investment Fund The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)is a voluntary program created by statute in 1977 as an investment alternative for California's local governments and special districts and continues today under Treasurer Bill Lockyer's administration. The enabling legislation forthe LAIF is Section 16429.1 et seq. of the California Government Code. This program offers local agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio, which invests hundreds of millions of dollars, using the investment expertise of the Treasurer's Office investment staff at no additional cost to the taxpayer. This in-house management team is comprised of civil servants who have each worked for the State Treasurer's Office for an average of 20 years. The LAIF is part of the Pooled Money I nvestment Account(PMIA). The PM IA began in 1955 and oversight is provided by the Pooled Money Investment Board (PMIB) and an in-house Investment Committee. The PMIB members are the State Treasurer, Director of Finance, and State Controller. The Local Investment Advisory Board (LIAB)provides oversight for LAIF. The Board consists of five members as designated by statute. The Chairman is the State Treasurer or his designated representative. Two members qualified by training and experience in the field of investment orfinance, and two members who are treasurers, finance or fiscal officers or business managers employed by any county,city or local district or municipal corporation of this state,are appointed by the State Treasurer. The term of each appointment is two years or at the pleasure of the appointing authority. All securities are purchased under the authority of Government Code Section 16430 and 16480.4. The State Treasurer's Office takes delivery of all securities purchased on a delivery versus payment basis using a third party custodian. All investments are purchased at market, and a market valuation is conducted monthly. Additionally, the PMIA has Policies, Goals and Objectives for the portfolio to make certain that our goals of Safety, Liquidity and Yield are not jeopardized and that prudent management prevails. These policies are formulated by investment staff and reviewed by both the PMIB and the LIAB on an annual basis. The State Treasurer's Office is audited by the Bureau of State Audits on an annual basis and the resulting opinion is posted to the STO website following its publication. The Bureau of State Audits also has a continuing audit process throughout the year. All investment and LAIF claims are audited on a daily basis by the State Controller's Office as well as an in-house audit process involving three separate divisions. 1 Revised December 31, 2006 Under Federal Law,the State of California cannot declare bankruptcy,thereby allowing the Govemment Code Section 16429.3 to stand.This Section states that"moneys placed with the Treasurer for deposit in the LAIF by cities,counties,special districts,nonprofit corporations,or qualified quasi- governmental agencies shall not be subject to either of the following: (a)transfer or loan pursuant to Sections 16310,16312,or 16313,or(b)impoundment or seizure by any state official or state agency." During the 2002 legislative session,California Government Code Section 16429.4 was added to the LAIF's enabling legislation. The Section states that"the right of a city,county,city and county, special district,nonprofit corporation,or qualified quasi-governmental agency to withdraw its deposited moneys from the LAIF,upon demand,may not be altered,impaired,or denied in any way,by any state official or state agency based upon the state's failure to adopt a State Budget by July 1 of each new fiscal year." The LAIF has grown from 293 participants and$468 million in 1977 to 2,612 participants and $16 billion in 2006. State Treasurer's Office Local Agency Investment Fund P.O.Box 942809 Sacramento,CA 94209-0001 (916)653-3001 hftp://www.treasurer.ca.gov/pmia-laif 2 Revised December 31,2006 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF PROCEEDS OF THE 2007 WATER AND WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the California Government Code creates a Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) in the State of California Treasury for the deposit of money of local agencies for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined in Resolution No. 17-2003 that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Government Code and the City's Investment Policy are in the best interests of the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of proceeds from bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other forms of indebtedness (proceeds) in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429.1 is also in the best interests of the City of Burlingame and the holders of City of Burlingame and Burlingame Financing Authority indebtedness, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The City of Burlingame does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of City of Burlingame proceeds in the Local Agency Investment fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429. 1 for the purpose of investment as stated therein, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information provided in that regard. 2. The following trustee of the City of Burlingame is hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund: Bank of New York until such time as the City of Burlingame notifies the Local Agency Investment Fund of any change in the trustee or the trustee's authority. MAYOR 1 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of_ 2007,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 RESOLUTION NO. 17-2003 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF MONIES IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the California Government Code creates a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State of California Treasury for the deposit of money of local agencies for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby affirms that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Government Code and the City's Investment Policy are in the best interests of the City of Burlingame; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The deposit and withdrawal of funds of the City of Burlingame in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429.1 for the purpose of investment as stated in this resolution, and verification by the State Treasurer's Office of all banking information provided in that regard is hereby authorized. 2. The following City officers or their successors in office are hereby authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of proceeds in the State Local Agency Investment Fund: JESUS NAVA LINDA FREITAS SHARI JACKSON Finance Director Deputy Treasurer Assistant Deputy Treasurer 3. These authorizations and designations shall be in effect until the City notifies the Local Agency Investment Fund in writing of any changes. 9. &dX,4-1 YOR I, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the3rd day ofFebruary , 2003, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, JANNEY, O'MAHONY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:NONE 1 j p �,�CITY CLERK 1CITY o� STAFF REPORT 6lJlZl.lN.... AGENDA cl— ITEM# 00 MTG. 0�.►ATMD NE b'Q DATE 04/02/2007 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTEDS BY Set.Dean Williams ! y DATE: 03/26/2007 APPROVED FROM: Jack Van Etten Chief of Police 5:�&) By Jim N ntell City Manager SUBJECT: Increase the maximum charge allowed for valet parking RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution to the existing ordinance (6.30) allowing Il Fornaio Restaurant/Lucas Parking Corporation to increase the rate in which they can charge for their service from $7.00 to a maximum of$15.00. DISCUSSION: In September 1998, City council allowed I1 Fornaio Restaurant/ Lucas Parking Corporation to charge a maximum of$7.00 for their valet service. Since that time (nearly 10 years), neither Il Fornaio nor Lucas Parking Corporation have requested an increase in the amount that they may charge for the service. In February on this year, Lucas Parking Corporation wrote the Burlingame Police Department asking that the price cap imposed on them be removed. They cited numerous factors that have led them to the point of making such a request. These factors include but are not limited to: the increase in the minimum wage since 1998 (up nearly 60% as of January 2008), Worker's compensation insurance premiums and liability/theft insurance have increased approximately 100% since 1998. Lucas Parking Corporation also cites other "operational expenses"have also followed suit with the above mentioned increases. Lucas Parking Corporation has requested that the maximum charge cap be removed from the existing ordinance (6.30). After some discussion, staff does not recommend the removal of the cap altogether. Staff recognizes the need to continue to monitor the amount which can be charged for this service to avoid the situation turning into a profit center and to avoid any possible abuses. However, given the information provided by Lucas Parking Corporation/I1 Fornaio Restaurant and the fact that there is no debating that all costs relating to this service have increased substantially since 1998, staff believes that it is reasonable to increase the maximum cap that can be charged for this service to $15.00. Therefore, staff is making the above recommendation (i.e. a resolution to the existing ordinance 6.30). It should be noted that the only other peninsula city that currently operates a similar service also regulates the amount in which the involved parties can charge. In fact, that city's current maximum cap is the same as our city's ($7.00). As of early March, that city has not received a request to increase and/or remove the existing cap. EXHIBITS: 1) Attached you will find a copy of the resolution to 6.30 allowing Lucas Parking Corporation/I1 Fornaio an increase in their fee schedule from $7.00 to a maximum of $15.00 per vehicle. 2) Attached you will find the written request and a subsequent written document which provides supporting factual information for their(Lucas Parking/I1 Fornaio)request. BUDGET IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the city. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME INCREASING THE MAXIMUM FEE FOR VALET PARKING SERVICE PURSUANT TO BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 6.30.010(c) RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,Chapter 6.30 of the Burlingame Municipal Code allow a valet parking service operating under a valet parking permit to charge a fee for the service; and WHEREAS, a maximum fee of$15.00 would appear to allow a business to retain a parking service and obtain parking spaces and meet the expenses involved in operating such a service, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. Holders of a valet parking service permit issued under Chapter 6.30 may charge a fee of up to $15.00 per vehicle for providing the service. MAYOR I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of ,2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK LUCAS PARKING CORPORATION COMMERCIAL PARKING • CONSULTING SERVICES March 19, 2007 Burlingame Police Department Sgt. Dean Williams P.O. Box 551 Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Sgt. Williams, In order to further clarify our constantly rising costs, I have included some of our major operating expenses going back to 2002. 1 do not have records going back to our original starting year of 1997, so we will just need to extrapolate from the following more current figures. 1) Wages - The rate we paid employees in 1997 had just risen from $4.75 to $5.00 per hour as seen in the Industrial Welfare Commission printout enclosed. I have also enclosed my most recent payroll summary date 3/10/07. Our current wages range from $7.50 per hour to $15.00 per hour. Our current exact payroll average is $10.51 per hour,well over a 100%increase since we began. This excludes our mandatory governmental employer tax contributions,which are also far in excess of what they were in 1997. 2) Liability and Theft Insurance - Our premium year that just ended in 2006 shows the rate we were charged, $155.00 per insurable space. Just 4 years earlier, during the 2002 to 2003 premium year, we were charged $1 10.00 per insurable space. This represents an increase of 40.91%over this past 4 year period, or 10.23% per year. Again, carried over a 10 year period, this also exceeds a 100% cost increase. 3) Worker's Compensation Insurance - Our rate for the policy period 4/1/02 to 4/1/03 was 7.767% of gross payroll. By the time we hit the policy period 4/1/05 to 4/1/06, our rate had risen to 10.67%. This represents a 37.37% increase over the 4 year period, or 9.34% per year. Carried over a 10 year period, this represents a 93.4% increase. Without the Governor's recent assault on rising worker's compensation costs, this figure would have been much higher. 4) Best Value - The best value I can find in recent cost history is the rent I pay on my shared 10' by 10', one room office. As you can see from the letter from my landlord, my rent rose approximately 47% during this period. Although my partner and I would like a larger office to share, we cannot afford to upgrade. I hope this cross section shows the losing battle we are facing. We cannot continue to operate unless we can pass our costs along. I must once again emphasize,we can and will only raise our per car rates when we need to and to an amount that the market will accept and pay. Like everyone else, our price ceiling is naturally built in by normal market conditions. Nick Lucas CARLMONT SHOPPING CENTER 1045 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS, SUITE A . BELMONT,CA 94002 BUS. (650)596-9527 9 (650)598-0825 • FAX(650)508-9233 LUCAS PARKING CORPORATION COMMERCIAL PARKING • CONSULTING SERVICES February 28, 2007 Burlingame Police Department Jack Van Etten, Chief of Police P.O. Box 551 Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Chief Van Etten, As you may know, my company operates the valet parking concession for II Fornaio Restaurant located at 327 Lorton Avenue, Burlingame. We have serviced this location for nearly 10 years now. As it has been explained to me, the City has a price fixing clause attached to the valet parking ordinance. We request that this condition be removed based upon the following. THE UNFOUNDED PREMISE Many years ago, certain City officials must have felt that the presence of valet parking in the downtown somehow posed a threat to downtown parking. The logic must have been that left to operate under normal market conditions, the existence of valet parking would cause a massive loss of available public space as well as a huge cost grip on those seeking to park in the downtown. ACTUAL IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY As valet parking operators, our impact on the parking space availability is ZERO. Every time we valet park a car, it is taken off of the public streets and parked in space we lease from Cal Train. I o go a step further, our impact on Cal Train customer space is also zero because we take no actual spaces. We staff the lot and double park vehicles behind the already parked Cal Train customers. THE DOWNTOWN BENEFITS Our impact is not just neutral. We are a greatly contributing asset to the downtown. Every time someone chooses to use valet parking, open street space is created because our cars are taken off street. This means that other neighbor businesses have the benefit of this open space for their own customers. And since we open the service to all members of the visiting public, this provides another choice for them. They may use the service at the same cost as all of the II Fornaio customers at any time that is convenient for them. Or they may park as they would have if the valet service was not available. CARLMONT SHOPPING CENTER 1045 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS, SUITE A • BELMONT,CA 94002 BUS. (650) 596-9527 . (650)598-0825 9 FAX (650)508-9233 PAGE 2OF2 THE PROOF IS IN THE TRUTH After]0 years in business at this location, we carry an excellent track record with the general public, the City and the Police Department. And after 10 years, our lunch valet charge is still $1 .00 underthe City price cap. Why did we not go straight to the maximum ratel 0 years ago? Because we would have been put immediately out of business. Our situation is no different than any other business. If we charge more than the market will bear, no one will purchase our service. If Safeway's mandated City maximum charge for a loaf of bread was set at$20.00,they would still price it at market value or be forced out of business. FAIRNESS FOR ALL Since we began offering valet service in Burlingame, through the end of this year when minimum wages increase once again, wages will have jumped approximately 60%. Worker's compensation insurance as well as liability and theft insurance have jumped 100%. Our other operational expenses have also followed suit. All businesses toe the fine line between inflationary costs to operate and the fear of raising their prices so much that they go out of business. We are no different. As far as we know, we are the only business in the entire City of Burlingame that is subject to price fixing. In the near future, we will need to raise our rates in order to continue operating. If we cannot raise our prices when we feel it is appropriate, we will go out of business. This would be a loss to the downtown. We ask only that we be afforded the same conditions to operate under that all other Burlingame businesses get. Please remove these artificial price controls from the ordinance so that we may continue to serve visitors to the downtown. Thank you, Ni�cl-3uc a Lucas Parking Corporation STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM MTG. yy '� DATE 'q-Z-07 RA'M Albft TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED // / BY v DATE: March 27,2007 APPRO f FROM: Jim Nantell 558-7205 BY SUBJECT: Council Goals 2007-08 RECOMMENDATION: Council confirm the listing of goals for inclusion in the 2007-08 budget BACKGROUND: The Council has developed a list of goals for inclusion in the 2007-08 budget year at a study session in January. Some additional items were identified at a joint Planning and Council study session last Saturday. The attached listing is our attempt to list those that we felt emerged as priorities for the Council. Please review to ensure that the list reflects the Council's direction. You will note that the first few are carry overs from the current year's goals. In addition as shown on attachment B there are other goals of interest to the Council that will be part of the Planning Commissions work program for the year. ATTACHMENTS: A. City Council Goals for FY 2007-08 B. Unapproved minutes of March 24,2007 Council/Planning Commission Minutes. Budget Impact: Will be included in the proposed budget for 2007-2008 which will come to the Council in may and June for action. Attachment A City Council Goals For FY 2007-08 1 . Undertake a Downtown Specific Plan. 2. Initiate a Historical Resources survey as a part of the Downtown Specific Area Plan. 3. Keep Safeway informed on Downtown SAP and encourage their active participation in the SAP. Encourage Safeway to work with community stakeholders to develop a mutually agreed upon concept for a new store. 4. Reactivate Neighborhood Watch program for emergency coordination and community communications as well as crime prevention. S. Master Plan for Lower Easton Drive between Vancouver Avenue and El Camino Real 6. Increase cleanliness in retail areas by restructuring existing resources to provide a single resource focus on improving the level of cleanliness. 7. Provide a part time resource to serve as an ambassador to help small businesses interested in locating in Burlingame or expanding an existing operation. 8. Consider Options for Ballot Measure to fund storm drainage and community center seismic needs. 9. Establish a "Go Green" task force of Council and Commission members to inventory current green and sustainable practices and evaluate additional appropriate measures to undertake in FY 2007- 2008. 10. Review the current regulations which apply to infill development and develop a policy and proposed regulations to insure `no net loss' of residential units when new projects are proposed. 11 . Planning Commission develop design criteria and amendment to the zoning regulations for the R-2 (duplex) and R-3 and R-4 (multiple family) zoning districts. 12. Based on the objective to balance meeting life-safety requirements and to encourage the retention of existing buildings, particularly in the commercial areas, staff will review current regulations in terms of their impacts on building retention and discuss with the City Council and Planning Commission the findings. Any streamlining or adjustments would be determined after review and discussion. Attachment B CITY OF BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Public Works Corporation Yard Training Room 1361 North Carolan Avenue March 24, 2007 I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Terry Nagel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Prescnt: Council members: Mayor Nagel, Vice-Mayor O'Mahony, Baylock, Cohen, Keighran. Commissioners: Chair Brownrigg, Auran, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Terrones, Vistica Staff. City Manager,Jim Nantell; City Planner,Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Planner, Maureen Brooks; Bill Meeker. H. DISCUSS THE COUNCIL'S FY 2006-2007 GOALS FOR PLANNING AND SET FY 2006-2007 WORK PROGRAM Council members,Planning Commissioners and staff discussed the various items suggested for discussion by the Council in the staff report. These included: over view of the accomplishments of the Planning Commission and Department in FY 2006-2007 with identification of the projects not gotten to; a `go green' strategy; and regulatory and processing issues including second hand smoke in multiple family dwellings, use of wood burning fireplaces, infill development, design review in the R-2,R-3 and R-4 zones, and ways to organize to address potential problems and facilitate processing projects, particularly those in existing buildings. As a group the Council members and Planning Commissioners discussed each item. At public comment the following members of the public spoke: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Kate O'Brien; Susan Castner-Paine;Matt Campagna. Following the public comment the group prioritized the issues identified, including those carried over from FY 2006-2007, into three categories: those to begin work on immediately, those to try to work into the program for the year; and those to reconsider for another year. First priority projects • Downtown Specific Plan: Preparation of the Downtown Specific Plan • Go Green Task Force: Establish a"Go Green"task force of Council and Commission members to inventory current green and sustainable practices CITY OF BURLINGAME JOINT CITY COUNCIUPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING UNAPPROVED MINUTES March 24, 2007 and evaluate additional appropriate measures to undertake in FY 2007- 2008. • Infill Development: Planning Commission review the current regulations which apply to infill development and develop a policy and proposed regulations to insure `no net loss' of residential units when new projects are proposed. • Design Review for Duplex and Multiple Family Development: Planning Commission develop design criteria and amendment to the zoning regulations for the R-2 (duplex)and R-3 and R-4 (multiple family)zoning districts. • Regulations for Existing Buildings: Based on the objective to balance meeting life-safety requirements and to encourage the retention of existing buildings,particularly in the commercial areas, development staff led by planning staff should review current regulations in terms of their impacts on building retention and discuss with the City Council and Planning Commission the findings. Any streamlining or adjustments would be determined after review and discussion. The Council and Commission members identified five items which, if there is time, should be addressed as well. Second Priority Projects + Housing Element Update: Initiate work on the 2009 Housing Element Update. • Revise Condominium Regulations: Update and revise the Residential and Commercial Condominium requirements,this might also include provisions to address `no net loss' of residential units and isolation of individual unit exhaust systems. • Update Inclusionary Housing Zoning Requirements: Complete the revision of the inclusionary zoning requirements to address changes in state law. • Zoning for 2001 Housing Element Implementation: Complete the Work Program of the 2001 Housing Element, place an overlay zone in the Rollins Road/Carolan Avenue area. • Business Ambassador Program: Work with Council to develop a Business Ambassador Program to facilitate and assist small businesses and developers through the approval and construction processes. One issue the group decided to defer,the regulation of wood burning fire places,because the Regional Air Quality Control Board has taken the lead on this issue. HI. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Nagel at 12:20 p.m. 2 Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting March 24, 2007 Work Program Following discussion of each item at the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting the City Council and Planning Commission members divided the fourteen items into three categories. Category A, which were the items of highest priority. Category B, which were the items to complete on a time-available basis. Category C those items which should be considered for next year(FY 2008-2009). Everyone present recognized that all fourteen items were important, but that time and community energy is limited. The items which were relegated to Category C were: • Zoning Code Clean-Up (1 vote) • Plan for the El Camino Corridor(Grand Boulevard) ( 3 votes) • Construction approaches to address second-hand smoke (2 votes) • Regulation of wood burning fire places including installation and hours of usage. (0 votes) Votes were those given these items in the Category B round. Category C resulted from the items which did not get enough votes to be selected in Category B. No Category C vote was taken to prioritize the Category C items among themselves. BURL NOAME : Board of Trustees Minutes - February 20, 2007 I. Call to Order Trustee Secretary Deborah Griffith called the meeting to order at 5:30pm. II. Roll Call Trustees Present: Nancy Brock, Bruce Carlton, Deborah Griffith, Katie McCormack Absent: Pat Toft Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian _ Sidney Poland, Recorder III. Warrants and Special Funds The Trustees unanimously approved the Warrants. M/S/C (Carlton/Brock) IV. Minutes The Trustees approved as written the minutes of the January 16, 2006 meeting. M/S/C (Carlton/McCormack) V. Correspondence and Attachments The Trustees reviewed the correspondence. VI. From the Floor - No one from the public attended. VII. Reports A. City Librarian's Report - Highlight of Report January Poetry Month - Sue Reiterman, Children's Librarian, reported to the Trustees that the K-8 annual poetry event was very successful with approximately 350 children participating. Sunday January 29th, 40 children gathered at the library to read their poetry. Washington School in Burlingame was the winning participant and the school received a large stuffed dog; North Hillsborough School received a "poetry puppy" for being second in the competition. 480 Primrose Road Burlingame•California 94010-4083) Phone(650)558-7474'Fax(650)342-6295'www.burlingame.org/library B. Library Foundation Author's Luncheon - The first fundraiser of the year will be an Author's Luncheon held at the Crystal Springs Golf Club on May 5th. Jackie Speier and Michaelene Cristini Risley co-authors of the book entitled This Is Not the Life I Ordered: 50 Ways to Keep Your Head Above Water When Life Keeps Dragging You Down with Jan Yanehiro and Deborah Collins Stephens have accepted the Foundation's invitation to speak at this event. C. Centennial Committee Centennial events have been finalized and can be found in the spring issue of the Burlingame Recreation Department's publication of classes and events. A parade on June 2nd will be the first event. VIII. Unfinished Business A. The Big Read Status - The Silicon Valley Community Foundation has funded "The Big Read" with a grant of$20,000. A total of 20 projects have been planned throughout the PLS system beginning with the opening event at the Burlingame Library on April 3rd. B. One Book/One Community Status - Michael Krasny (KQED- Radio) has accepted the City Librarian's invitation to engage in a conversation with Isabelle Allende pertaining to the writing of her work "Daughter of Fortune" at the San Mateo Performing Art Center on October 11, 2007. IX. New Business A. Employee Appreciation Dinner - Trustees Carlton, Griffith and Toft will serve on the committee for this annual event. Trustee Carlton suggested that the Library send out a Request'for Proposal to other hotels in Burlingame to obtain a cost comparison for an event of this type. He requested that the Recording Secretary compile the results and report to the Trustees before the next meeting in March. B. Centennial Exhibit - Pat Harding, Library Services Manager, and Al Escoffier met with Russ Cohen, President of the Burlingame Historical Society, to discuss ways in which the Library could participate in the Centennial project. Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2 February 20,2007 1. Burlingame Photographs - The Library has a number of historical photographs that will be framed for a public exhibit and will be available for purchase. 2. Coffee Table Book - Two members of the'Historical Society, Joanne Garrison and Jean Silviera, are writing a chronological history of Burlingame which will also be available for purchase in the fall. C. Possible Problem Patron - Request to Prohibit Access to Library for 60 days 1. Background The City Librarian updated the Trustees on the inappropriate actions both verbal and physical that a patron has exhibited towards staff, as well as other patrons, on more than one occasion during library open hours. 2. Request to Solve Issue - The City Librarian requested that the Trustees review and approve his letter to the patron which states that the patron's library privileges have been suspended for a period of 60 days. 3. Trustee Action - The Trustees unanimously approved the motion of Trustee Carlton that staff proceed with a letter to the patron, via her h(alth care worker, which states that the patron not enter either the main Library or Easton Library for a period of 60 days. M/S/C (Carlton/McCormack) X. Announcements A. CALTAC workshop will be held on March 10th. B. The Commissioners' Dinner is Friday, March 9th at the Broadway Grill. C. At the City Council meeting on March 5th, The Library will be presented with a Proclamation for the Big Read - "To Kill a Mockingbird". Trustee Griffith and City.Librarian, Al Escoffier, will accept the Proclamation. XL Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:00pm. M/S/C (Carlton/McCormack). The next meeting will be held March 20, 2007 at 5:30pm in the Library Conference room. Respectfully Submitted, Alfred H. Esco ier City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3 February 20,2007 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, March 15, 2007 The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by Chairman Dittman at 7:00 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Dittman, Muller, Hesselgren, Shanus, Larios, Castner-Paine Commissioners Absent: Comaroto Staff Present: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz; Account Clerk III Joleen Butler; Recreation Supervisor Lynn Mutto Others Present: Liz McManus, San Mateo Union High School District; Todd Lee, Greystone West Co.; Lisa Alms, Coyotes Lacrosse MINUTES The Minutes of the February 15, 2007 regular meeting were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENTS— None OLD BUSINESS A. Status of Bayside Park Restroom/Snack Shack Project Director Schwartz reported that the Restroom/Snack Shack is in place and hooked up, but more work is needed before the final permits can be issued. The hope is that everything will be final and complete for opening day of baseball, which is next Saturday. NEW BUSINESS A. Arsenic Update Liz McManus, Associate Superintendent of San Mateo Union High School District and Todd Lee, a consultant from Greystone West, hired by the School District were present at the meeting. They reported that the District is moving forward with studies on the Burlingame High School property with the Department of Toxic Substances to identify where there are hotspots on the property. Todd Lee stated the plans to eliminate the PCB, lead and arsenic contaminations from the property: The source of the PCB contamination is a transformer in the back courtyard, which was sourced, by an old pot transformer from back in the 40's and 50's. The contamination is localized to the supporting post that is holding the transformer. The cleanup for this contamination will take place over spring break. The contamination of lead surrounds the main building and is due to painting that was done years ago. There are 140 cubic yards of contamination around the perimeter of the building. The cleanup will be done in June as soon as school is out. It will take approximately 40 days to complete. Parks &Recreation Commission Minutes March 15, 2007—Page 2 The Arsenic contamination is on the front lawn and rear courtyard. The Department of Toxic and Substance Control (DTSC) will be doing additional testing and will be regulating the cleanup as it in progresses. The scheduled start date for the Arsenic cleanup is June 18th. Care will be taken to ensure the health of the trees. Commissioner Castner-Paine asked if the cleanup would impact the June Art in the Park event. Lee and Schwartz both assured her that the cleanup would not affect the event in any way. Commissioner Shanus inquired as to whether or not the additional testing would cause any delays to the cleanup. Lee felt that additional testing would prove there is less contamination than originally thought. Commissioner Hesselgren asked how far down into the ground contamination goes. Lee stated that a maximum of six inches of excavation is done, the ground is then tested again and gopher mesh will be place over the entire perimeter of the contaminated area extending to the drip line of the trees. This will prevent any future accidental digging in the area. DTSC has agreed with this plan of action. Commissioner Dittman asked what is done with the "bad" dirt. Lee said it is hauled to Kettleman City and that the removal company pays by the ton of dirt for the removal. The project is estimated to cost $4 million and the School District is asking the State to pay for half of that amount. Commissioner Larios asked when the work on the artificial field in the back would begin. Lee stated that the work was scheduled to start near the end of July with a completion date of November. Schwartz inquired if any Recreation programs would be affected due to the cleanup and the work on the back field. Lee responded that the work areas would be limited to the contaminated areas with a 50 feet perimeter around those areas. The fields should not be affected. Noting that the pool is only 15ft from the back field and the tennis courts are adjacent to the field, Commissioner Larios asked if these facilities would be affected by the airborne dust. He asked if egress of the trucks would be covered as they leave the area. Lee stated that the dirt will be sprayed before removal and both the tennis courts and pool can be operable during the summer. Lee also confirmed that the trucks would be covered once filled to minimize airborne dust. Commissioner Muller inquired if there would still be access to the theatre. Lee stated that certain access doors to the School will be limited and the front lawn and the area around the courtyard would be off limits, but that access to the theater will always be available. He also mentioned that a hygienist from DTSC will be on site during the entirety of the project. Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes March 15, 2007—Page 3 B. Adoption of Parks Use Rule Regarding Use of Private Barbecues in City Parks Schwartz reported that the drafted policy is a pro-active measure by the City Manager to provide for risk management. The list has been compiled for recommendation to City Council to adopt. Commissioner Muller asked where BBQ's would be allowed at Bayside Park and questioned whether they should be permitted on sidewalks and if a fire extinguisher should be required. She also asked if specific parks could be excluded from having BBQ's. Schwartz stated that the Rule could prohibit BBQ's from specific parks. Chairperson Dittman noted that people currently have BBQ's at Village Park near the picnic tables within 50' of the playground area. Commissioner Shanus suggested requiring cover and disposal bin on site to promote safe conditions. Commissioner Larios suggested requiring a permit for BBQ's in all parks. This could be done easily by the Parks & Recreation Department and would give staff a chance to educate the public about the safety issues associated with BBQ's in the Parks. In order to give the Commissioners time to visit various parks and consider other implications, the issue was tabled until the April meeting. REPORTS/HAND-OUTS A. Staff Reports In addition to the attached monthly report, Director Schwartz reported that Caltrans recently removed nine elm trees along El Camino Real due to Dutch Elm Disease. Schwartz contacted representatives from Caltrans and reminded them that past practice calls for Caltrans to handle replacements at a 2:1 ratio, recognizing that some of the trees will not survive their first few years. The current District administration initially balked at replacing the elms, citing several reasons (cost of planting, past agreement only discussed eucalyptus trees, agreement was made by previous administration and local agencies should take over planting and maintenance), but ultimately agreed to a site meeting on March 15'x'. On March 8th, Schwartz, while attending the Parks & Recreation Conference in Sacramento, met with State Assemblymen Gene Mullin and also met with State Senator Leland Yee. In addition to reminding both Mullin and Yee of the importance of Parks facilities, recreation programs and the need for infrastructure improvements (State propositions 1 C, 84 and 1 D), he also mentioned the need to replace the trees per the previous agreements. Both members of the State legislature volunteered to work with Caltrans Director Bijan Sartipi if needed. Mullin understood the importance of the El Camino Real trees to the Burlingame community. Yee's aide, Kirsten Wallerstedt, volunteered to bring the tree issue up at their regular meetings with the Caltrans regional directors, Ruby Louie and Gene Gonzalo, if the elm tree issue is not resolved to our satisfaction. Parks& Recreation Commission Minutes March 15, 2007—Page 4 At the March 15`h site meeting, Schwartz & Parks Supervisor Bob Disco met with Deputy District Director Usen Inyang, Area Superintendent Robert Salazar and Caltrans staff member Mariko Roberts. Inyang continued to express Caltrans' interest of turning all maintenance and liability issues related to the trees over to the City, "If the trees mean that much to this community then you should take over the maintenance". Schwartz suggested that (1) Caltrans replace the nine trees at this time and (2) both parties would meet to discuss the long-range maintenance of the trees. Inyang stated that trees are a liability for Caltrans' future and does not see any benefit to spending any money or"planting more liabilities" until the City agrees to take over the maintenance responsibilities. Schwartz said that a long-term Agreement cannot be done quickly, asked that the nine elms be replanted in the meantime and his preference to handle this between the staff members of the two agencies rather than having this issue go public and political. Inyang stated that members of the public could contact him directly if they did not agree with his approach. Salazar said that planting the nine trees would not be difficult or costly, but the best time for the planting would be in the Fall. Inyang repeated that Caltrans is making no promises to replant the trees, and if the trees are replanted, there is no promise of size of tree to be used or that proper maintenance would be followed. Salazar stated that 15 gallon trees are typically used, but Inyang asked Salazar if the elms come in 5 gallon or 3 gallon sizes. Commissioner Castner-Paine thought that it was time to let the public know about the problems with Caltrans so letters can be written as people are upset about this issue. Commissioner Muller mentioned that in Millbrae the sides of El Camino are being filled in with appropriate trees and asked why this is an issue here in Burlingame. Schwartz said that Millbrae is footing the bill for those trees. Caltrans wants Burlingame to take over the replacement of the trees as many other cities in the Bay Area have. The difference is the historic status of the trees along El Camino and the long history of Caltrans' maintenance. Commissioner Larios inquired as to what the liability is on the trees. Schwartz stated that El Camino Real is impacted with homes, apartments, pedestrians and cars that are a source of liability if a limb falls due to improper maintenance. Schwartz also stated that if even one tree falls, he suspects many people will be pressing to remove all the trees. Schwartz stated that currently there is no perfect grid to say when to remove a tree or when a tree is unsafe. He would like to see the trees removed and replaced due to health concerns (as determined by a certified arborist) before they become a hazard instead of stating a magic number of years of the life of the tree before you remove and/or replace one. Commissioner Dittman feels that Caltrans is handling this issue poorly. Schwartz mentioned that Burlingame's working agreement with Caltrans states that we are informed by Caltrans when they will be removing trees and the dates the replacement of those removals will take place. Unfortunately, the first we had heard of this recent removal was from the neighbors. Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes March 15, 2007—Page 5 B. 2006-07 Monthly Revenue Report— see attached C. Commissioner Reports 1. Commissioner Muller expressed her appreciation for the Commissioners dinner. 2. Commissioner Hesselgren inquired as to the possibility of placing a top on the recycling bins in Washington Park to keep the public from removing items from the bins. (The City does not rely on the money from recycling bins in the parks. Recycling from the parks is the same as resident recycling) 3. Commissioner Shanus updated the Commission regarding the BSD/City relationship in that he has spoken with one of the school board members and she will be attending a future meeting of the Commission. Shanus also mentioned that a recent mis-communication between BIS and its parents caused some confusion regarding the sponsorship of a "6th Grade Dance". He is hoping there is some way to keep the parents informed better regarding events that may affect them to avoid any future issues. 4. Commissioner Dittman reported that she has heard many compliments from the public regarding the condition of Murray Field. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 pm. Respectfully submitted, v Joleen Butler Burlingame Parks & Recreation Account Clerk III City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept. 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame CA 940106 ?3 e AME a a phone: (650) 558-7300 • fax: (650) 696-7216 recreation�burlingame.org `� ' ►aw' �a w tom^ Date: March 14,2007 To: Parks&Recreation Commissioners City Council From: Randy Schwartz Re: Monthly Report Parks Division 1. All fields opened on Feb. 26. 2. Arbor Day celebration was held at Cuernavaca Park on March 5. Seven local schools participated, as well as the California Department of Forestry. Eight trees were planted. 3. Parks Division crews has been engaged in field preparation for spring sports leagues. Murray field was overseeded. 4. City tree contractor is completing work on the Burlingame Avenue Eucalyptus trees. 5. City Tree Crew is continuing to prune Sycamores in selected areas. Recreation Division General 1. Summer Brochure has gone to printer and will be distributed on approximately March 26th Teens/Youth Programs 2. Two Manners Are Fun for Boys and Girls were held with 19 students enrolled. 3. New Taiko Drumming classes began with 9 students enrolled. 4. 12 teams in 6th grade basketball 5. YAC participated in Peninsula YAC social with 90 other teens Adult Programs 6. Ballroom Dancing for adults had 38 enrolled. 7. Evening Artists Workshop class going for the lit time 8. Adult basketball season started with two leagues—6 men's teams; 4 women's Senior Citizens Programs 9. Friday Bridge Drop-in is averaging 12 people 10. Friday Movie Drop-in averages 25-30 people 11. Emeritus lecture featuring an Audiologist had 30 people attend 12. Film festival had 10 attend 13. Trip to Jersey Boys had 19 attend 14. Computer class at the high school has 20 senior citizens participating Upcoming Events 1. Community Golf Tournament—May 21st—Green Hills Country Club— 12:00noon Shotgun Start 2. Centennial Parade&Vintage Base Ball Game—June 2nd 3. Art in the Park—June 9th/10th 4. Music in the Park—Sundays in July BURLINGAME PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Collection Report February 2007 Recreation Division 2006-07 2005-06 2004-05 Current Month COLL.YTD COLL.YTD COLL.YTD &ej Dept Program Gross Refunds Current Net 25 01 Misc.Admin. 220.00 220.00 175.00 980.21 2,84959 18% 1 10 Advertising 1,188.00 1,188.00 3,111.75 1,124.50 365.50 277% 26 12 Tix/Bks/ArtSls 884.50 - 884.50 38,590.24 41,256.20 31,223.11 94% 2 13 Bldg.Rental 7,047.50 295.00 6,752.50 55,988.50 44,123.00 43,507.50 127% 27 Rental Deposits 1,575.00 2,248.00 (673.00) (966.00) 1,684.00 (1,225.00) -57% 3 16 Park Permit 572.00 - 572.00 4,249.50 3,775.00 2,275.00 113% 28 1294 Pool Rental - - 21,775.00 26,613.00 15;02816 82% 4 20 Sr. Lunch - - - - 478.00 #DIV/0! 29_ 21 Sr.Activities 915.00 87.00 828.00 15,316.80 16,084.00 15,253.00 95% 5 22 Teens 932.00 156.00 776.00 14,692.00 17,767.12 16,740.00 83% 30 23 Jr.Teen Camps - - - 11,826.50 6,893.75 10,379.25 1729/b 8 24 PFRN - - - - 150.00 #DIV/01 6 30 Pre-school 154.15 154.15 119,899.25 126,616.32 100,394.00 95% 31 31 Pre-Sch.Class 6,664.00 6,664.00 89,973.75 98,627.25 95,647.74 91% 32 41 Lang.Arts 733.00 - 733.00 11,966.00 8,072.00 8,917.00 148% 9 44 Adult Art 5,148.00 658.00 4,490.00 78,896.00 68,441.00 72,222.50 115% 34 45 Culinary 43.00 - 43.00 6,432.00 3,265.50 3,306.00 197% 10 46 Youth Art 4,609.00 422.00 4.187.00 60,140.03 40,700.25 23,720.50 148% 35 47 Misc.Art 109.00 - 109.00 1,273.00 42.00 407.75 3031 12 48 Computers 377.00 - 377.00 2,696.00 1,022.00 1,775.00 264% 7 49 Enrichment 199.25 79.00 120.25 79,375.75 80,784.58 45,854.50 98% 11 50 Artin Park - - - - 750.00 630.00 0% 37 60 Special Classes 1,788.00 600.00 1,188.00 13,220.00 15,865.00 11,034.50 83% 13 61 Fitness 5,156.50 114.00 5,042.50 48,898.00 47,716.65 48,823.50 102% 38 62 Sport Classes 1,180.00 196.00 984.00 21,456.00 16,353.02 14,083.50 131% 14 70 Youth Camps/Trips 779.00 100.00 679.00 22,472.50 16,430.60 26,163.75 137% 15 72 Contract Sprts 658.00 - 658.00 43,083.00 48,869.30 42,842.00 88% 40 80 Elem.Sports 190.00 190.00 26,838.00 27,977.00 27,518.50 96% 16 81 BIS Sports 1,160.00 1,160.00 59,966.00 68,542.00 69,883.75 87% 41 82 Tennis Lessons 1,977.00 1,977.00 23,827.25 18,141.00 19,161.00 131% 17 83 Tennis Courts 195.00 195.00 6,676.63 6,593.75 4,424.25 0 42 84 Golf Classes 484.00 484.00 6,428.00 9,681.50 6,301.00 66% 18 85 Misc.Sports 3,754.00 3,754.00 11,919.00 15,307.00 15,797.00 78% 43 86 Field Lgts/Rent 5,716.00 5,716.00 23,309.75 18,394.50 20,449.00 127% 19 87 Softball 15,562.50 15,562.50 28,714.50 35,709.99 39,640.02 80% 44 88 Basketball 735.00 735.00 2,940.00 2,812.00 7,240.00 105% 20 89 Volleyball 416.00 416.00 9,368.00 9,203.00 7,474.72 102% 21 90 lYth Aqu.Class 130.00 - 130.00 29,455.00 22,785.00 18,847.19 129% 45 91 Adlt Aqu.Class 2,007.00 185.00 1,822.00 10,329.50 7,949.00 9,334.50 130% " 46' 92 Lap Swim @Rec 131.00 - 131.00 1,881.00 16,155.35 2,658.00 12% 22. 93 Rec Swim - - 3,337.00 20,247.90 506.00 16% 24 Yth Schlor.Fund - - - 331.00 600.00 - 550/. Sub-totals 73,389.40 5,140.00 68,249.40 1,009,861.20 1,013,955.24 882,081.28 Revenues @ Pool 1 936.00 1 - 936.00 1 37,805.40 1 20,055.40 1 38,597.95 1 1891.7 Recreation Totals $ 74,325.40 $ 5,140.00 69,185.40 $ 1,047,666.60 $ 1,034,010.64 $ 920,679.23 101% 47 Parks Revenue 200.00 50.00 1,275.00 400% 48 Field Prep Fees - - - 23 95 Golf Cards - - Dept Totals I$ 741325.40 1 $ 5,140.00 1 69,185.40 1$ 1,047,866.60 $ 1,034,060.64 $ 921,954.23 3/15/20078:33 Aquatics Totals 1 1,067.00 - 1 1,067.00 1 64,798.40 1 83,071.65 1 56,790.11 178% CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA March 26, 2007 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brownrigg called the March 26,2007,regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Deal, Terrones and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Cauchi, Osterling Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Erica Strohmeier; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Doug Bell. III. MINUTES The minutes of the March 12, 2007 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were amended item 1, 12 Vista Lane,line 3 of that item should be amended to read"... but has not discussed the site in any detail with the applicant...". The minutes were approved unanimously as amended. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. Chair Brownrigg noted that based on a letter received he would move item 1 a, 329 Occidental, from the Consent Calendar to the first item on the Regular Action Calendar. Otherwise the Agenda remained as submitted. V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue,commented on the three FYI projects on the agenda. VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no study items for review. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissionerprior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Brownrigg noted that item I a, 329 Occidental Avenue, would be moved to the first item on the Regular Action calendar. He then asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. lb. 624 TRENTON WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR UNCOVERED PARKING SPACE LENGTH FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(KATRINA KUHL,KUHL ARCHITECTURE,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;SUZI AND FRANK HENNELLY, PROPERTY OWNERS) (47 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER 1C. 819 WALNUT AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A BASEMENT (MICHAEL RABBIT, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MARK ROBERTSON, DESIGNER) (107 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 Id. 2620 HALE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(KEVIN WEINMANN,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;LORNA BECCARIA, PROPERTY OWNER) (58 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN le. 1110 EASTMOOR ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (GREG AND DIANE HAUPT, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (55 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Comment on the Consent Calendar: Commissioners noted that the conditions on the project at 819 Walnut Avenue,item 1 c,should be amended to require that a rat abatement program shall be prepared and executed before demolition or any construction commences on the property. Further it was noted for the project at 624 Trenton Avenue,item lb,that for security the property owner could install either opaque or tinted glass in the garage door if they wished. C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion. The motion passed 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi, Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:12 p.m. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM la. 329 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(RANDY GRANGE,TRG ARCHITECTS,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;JOE AND JULIA MCVEIGH,PROPERTY OWNERS) (49 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report March 26, 2007, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Seventeen conditions were suggested for consideration. Letter from Alan and Suzie Klein, March 20, 2007, to Planning Commission. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Joe McVeigh,property owner,329 Occidental Avenue;Randy Grange, architect; Susie Klein, 325 Occidental Avenue; Robert Bodreau, 333 Occidental Avenue. Issues noted: existing landscaping along side property lines;driveway configuration;hammerhead in rear yard for forward exit; change in plans re: basement and terraces; keep existing wooden property line fence during construction;protect/retain existing established hedge on the right side property line. There were no further comments. The public hearing was closed. Comment on the motion: Following items need to be addressed on the plans: • On the left side property line in the small space along the fence plant Pittosporum and provide a protection plan and implement it during construction to protect the established hedge along the right side property line; • Curve the driveway in order to retain as much as possible of the existing landscaping(trees)on the left side, including the Holly tree; 2 I City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 • On one sheet of the plans note all the existing trees,unprotected size as well as protected, along all the property lines; • For greater mature height consider Bradford Pear and Grecian Laurel in the rear; Chair Brownrigg noted that the house is completed,think changes to it were improvements,the removal of the basement was the applicant's choice, moved to bring the item back on the consent calendar when the landscape plan and driveway have been amended as recommended. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item to the consent calendar after the landscape and site plans have been amended based on the direction given and reviewed by Planning staff. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers Cauchi,Osterling absent). Staffnoted that they would renotice this item when it was placed on the agenda again. This item concluded at 8:52 p.m. 2. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report March 26,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eighteen(18)conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if any revised plans were submitted, staff responded no. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Chu, 55 W. 43`d Ave San Mateo, architect; Jason and Denise Payne, property owners; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Ave, spoke. Issues noted: front porch area; flat areas on roof; fireplace insufficient setback; Jasmine on landscape plan; curved windows; one car garage required;tree protection;and construction site maintenance requirements. The applicant submitted proposed revisions to the Commission. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: ■ May want to extend the rafters up on the roof at a pitch in order to avoid flat areas,particularly on the smallest flat area; tar and gravel is a lot of work and water can pond; ■ The proposed fireplace along the right side elevation has an insufficient setback to the property line, it needs to move at least 6"in towards the house; ■ The Jasmine vines along the left side property line need to be planted closer together and there should be more of them, in order to create a landscape barrier between the two properties; ■ The curved windows proposed on the house shall be retained during construction and shall not be replaced with rectangular windows; ■ An arborist report,prepared by a licensed arborist,shall be submitted with tree protection measures for the protected Oak tree in the rear yard,and the City Arborist shall review and approve the arborist report; the protection measures should be installed before a building permit is issued; ■ During construction,the applicant should coordinate,if possible,with the next door neighbor to share a debris box or at least avoid having two debris boxes on the street at the same time; the applicant shall abide by the new construction site maintenance requirements. C. Auran moved to approve the original plans and application, by resolution, with all conditions. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 CA Anderson encouraged the Commission to not approve the project with the plans submitted at the meeting because they have not yet been reviewed by staff and their content is not reflected in the staff report or record. He stated that the Commission could place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans, reviewed by staff and there is room on the agenda. C. Auran amended his motion and moved to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes noted by the Commission had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m. 3. 1136 OXFORD ROAD, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW FOR CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(SARAH & BENJAMIN CHEYETTE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; TIM HALEY, TSH INTERNATIONAL, ARCHITECT) (59 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report March 26, 2007, with attachments. ZT Strolimeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Sarah Cheyette,property owner,spoke. Issues noted: size and material of vents at front elevation; only Scheme A will work in this circumstance; with Scheme A front fascia should be extended slightly and to the eave as well; header boards; placement and size of bathroom widow;can window be lowered a few inches;window box material; and cast stone material under windows. The public hearing was closed. C. Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with added conditions that Scheme A, date stamped March 13,2007,be approved for the front elevation;that the eave over the bathroom at the front is extended proportionally to the wall to retain the same eave projection as approved originally;the bathroom window at the front should be lowered as much as possible and that the vents, as reflected in Scheme A, shall be made of wood and with the conditions in the staff report: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 13,2007, Scheme A front elevation,date stamped January 29,2007,left side elevation,date stamped January 11, 2006, sheets A0.10 to A3.03 (excluding the proposed front, sheet A3.01, and left side, sheet A3.03, elevations), and topographic survey sheet 1, with simulated true divided light windows and traditional wood stucco mold throughout, and with the relocation of the stairs between the garage and the house into the house and out of the required parking area; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; (2) that the eave over the bathroom and front door be extended proportionally to the extension of the wall so that the eave projection remains the same as originally approved;that if possible,the bathroom window at the front when relocated in the new wall, shall be lowered as much as possible;the two vents,as shown in Scheme A, shall be made of wood; (3) that the variance for parking space width shall only apply to this residential building and shall become void if the building is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster or for replacement; (4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 18, 2005 4 r City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 memo and the Fire Marshal's,the City Engineer's,the Recycling Specialist's,and the NPDES Coordinator's November 21,2005,memos,shall be met; (5) that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (6) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; (7) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional,shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; (8) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (9) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type, etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; (10) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (11) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; (12) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and (13) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m. 4. 2212 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A BASEMENT AND DETACHED GARAGE (BEN BEHRAVESH, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; KENDRICK LI, PROPERTY OWNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report March 26, 2007, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twenty(20) conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Kendrick Li,applicant and property owner,Ben Behravesh,4 W. Santa Inez Ave San Mateo,architect;Dennis and Delores Huajardo, 1400 Columbus Avenue;Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue,spoke. Issues noted: applicant volunteered to go to a design review consultant;wood headers missing over five windows along left elevation; headers over arched windows will be made of stucco; decorative railing;more traditional to have simulated true divided lite windows; site design; spiral staircase used to exit the sunken garden area; lights mounted on outside of house; greenbelt of backyards; detached garage verses a sunken attached garage; privacy tree hedge; noise from basement and sunken garden; large houses and maximum allowable FAR; basement used as fifth bedroom or second unit; City 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 infrastructure supporting sump pumps;a drainage plan;not required to have a basement,but required to have a second exit from a basement; and great house,but on wrong lot. The public hearing was closed. C. Deal moved to approve the application,by resolution,with added conditions that simulated true divided lite windows on a grid pattern be used throughout the house,to be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an FYI item; that the spiral staircase out of the sunken garden be eliminated and replaced with a ladder per California Building Code requirements; and that the only lighting on the left side shall be landscape lighting directed to the ground, and with the conditions in the staff report: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 14, 2007, sheets DD-1 through DD-7.0; that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; that the spiral staircase from the sunken garden shall be eliminated and replaced with a ladder per California Building Code requirements; and that the only lighting along the left side shall be landscape lighting directed to the ground, with the cone of light kept on the site as required in the Burlingame Ordinance; (2) that any street tree roots of one inch diameter or larger that are encountered during installation of the new sidewalk and driveway are not to be damaged or cut prior to inspection and approval by the City Arborist or the Park Department Supervisor; (3) that all windows shall be simulated true divided lite windows with a grid pattern and these windows shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an FYI item before issuance of a building permit; (4) that an automatic gate shall be installed in the driveway a minimum 20'-0'back from the front property line; (5) that all skylights shall be tinted to reduce night glare; (6) that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report prepared by Arborlogic Consulting Arborists, dated August 3, 2006; (7) that the conditions of the City Arborist's March 21, 2007 memo, the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's November 27, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 29, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 27,2006 memo,and the NPDES Coordinator's June 12,2006 memo shall be met; (8) that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (9) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; (10) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; (11) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s)and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; (12) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; (13) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (14) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff shall inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; (15) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (16) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; (17) that the project shall comply with the Construction and 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; (18) that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence,the applicant shall use all applicable"best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff, (19) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and (20) that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Brownrigg called for a roll call vote on the motion to approve the proposed project with the added conditions. The motion passed on a 4-1-2(C.Brownrigg dissenting,Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent)roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:30 p.m. 5. 1318 BENITO AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BUILDING HEIGHT FOR A CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (FRANK PRENDERGAST, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; PIERRE AND CAROL UHARRIET,PROPERTY OWNERS) (57 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report March 26,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven(11)conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if there were any changes to the project other than the height, staff responded no. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Phillip Uharriet,property owners son, and Frank Prendergast, architect, were available to answer questions. The public hearing was closed. C. Deal moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped December 12, 2003, sheets Al through A5 and date stamped March 14, 2007, sheets Al and A4; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of he building shall require and amendment to this permit; (2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to design review; (3) that the property owner at 1318 Benito Avenue shall be responsible for implementing the recommendations listed in the March 23,2004 arborist's report to preserve and protect the existing Coast Redwood tree located at 1320 Benito Avenue;the recommendations include measures to be implemented before, during and after construction is complete; (4) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; (5) that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all new windows shall be true divided light wood windows and shall contain a wood stucco-mould trim to match the existing trim as close as possible; (6) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (7) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (8) that the conditions of the City Arborist's April 5, 2004,memo including the requirements of the Arborlogic Consulting report dated March 23,2004,and the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, Fire Marshal's and Recycling Specialist's August 11, 2003, memos shall be met; (9) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; (10) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and (11) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C.Brownrigg. Commission noted that an extremely large tree and the slope of the lot help to mitigate the height of the house. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:40 p.m. 6. 1800 TROUSDALE DRIVE, ZONED TW — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,DESIGN REVIEW,CONDOMINIUM PERMIT,TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP, FRONT SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A 25-UNIT, 7-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (PAUL BOGATSKY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, ARCHITECT) (14 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS a. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, DESIGN REVIEW, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT; AND b. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP—PROJECT ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG Reference staff report March 24,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifty-two(52)conditions including the mitigation monitoring program were suggested for consideration. CP noted that on February 12, 2007, the Commission held a public hearing on this multiple family residential project and continued the action until the applicant had responded to several design and open space issues identified. The applicant submitted revised plans dated March 14,2007,and notice was sent for a continued public hearing this evening. Commissioners had no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Dan Ionesco, architect, and Paul Bogatsky, property owner, represented the project. Issues discussed: the changes to the plans, placement of wrought iron below the store front gate; the construction of the trellis on the front of the building; the new podium used for open space; materials sample board. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C.Vistica made a motion finding that,on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in writing and at the public hearing,there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a negative impact on the environment,so recommend the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Tentative Condominium Map to the City Council for action. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to find the Mitigated Negative Declaration an adequate environmental disclosure and recommending both the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Tentative Condominium Map to the Council for action. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi, Osterling absent) voice vote. Commissioners comments on the project: because of the proximity of the hospital entrance across the street from this site would like to see all staging and debris management for this project done on site, applicant should find alternate parking for employees and for storage of materials during construction if necessary. Note that the exception for lot coverage is met because the area covered not only improves the quality of life in the building by sheltering future residents and neighbors from noise from the access ramps to the parking area below the building but also provides additional open space for the use of future owners; the front setback variance is justified on the basis that a major objective of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan is to increase pedestrian activity and life on the street, because the grade on this lot and easement location resulted in the first deck of parking being at grade, the main entrance into the building projecting into the front setback supports the objective of bringing more life to the street and encourages pedestrians. C.Vistica made a motion to approve the residential condominium permit,front setback variance,conditional use permits for lot coverage and height for a new seven story 25-unit residential condominium project by resolution with amended conditions that building materials for this proj ect shall be stored on this property or managed from another property in the area approved by the City Engineer; that all employee parking and equipment parking for this construction project shall be provided on the site or shall be provided on another site in the immediate area as approved by the City Engineer; that no mitigations proposed for materials storage, equipment storage and staging, or employee parking shall involve the Plaza Shopping Center parking or facilities; and that the portions of the trellises on the front elevation shown to be built with the 2x 10's shall be increased to at least 4x 10 over the 6x6 posts; and with all the conditions, including the conditions from the mitigation monitoring plan as follows: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 14,2007,sheets A0.1,A.1,A2.1,A2.1.1,A2.2 through A2.7,A3.1 through A3.4,A4.1,A4.2,A5.1 through A5.9, Ground Floor Landscape Plan and Podium Level Landscape Plan, and Boundary and Topographic Survey Plan and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map; and that the portions of the trellises on the front elevation shown to be 2x10's shall be increased to at least 4x 10 over the 6x6 posts; (2) that building materials for this project shall be stored on this property or managed from another property in the area as approved by the City Engineer;that all employee parking and equipment parking for this construction project shall be provided on the site or shall be provided on another site in the immediate area as approved by the City Engineer;that no mitigations proposed for materials storage,equipment storage and staging,or employee parking shall involve the Plaza Shopping Center parking or any of its facilities; (3) that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 117.18" as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Trousdale Drive(42.18')for a maximum height of 75'-0",and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The lower level garage floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 33.5';at-grade garage level finished floor elevation shall be elevation 425; first floor above garage finished floor shall be elevation 53.5'; second floor finished floor shall be elevation 63.5'; third floor finished floor shall be elevation 73.5'; fourth floor finished floor shall be elevation 83.5'; sixth floor loft finished floor shall be elevation 102.5'; and the top of ridge elevation shall be no more than 117.18'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; (4) that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure,replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; (5) that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (6) that the backflow prevention device and post indicator valve (PIV) shall be located and screened by landscaping so they will be hidden from both the street and project residents; (7) that the conditions of the City Engineer's June 21,2006,memo,the Chief Building Official's August 2,2005,memo, the Fire Marshal's August 12, 2005 and September 3, 2006 memos, the NPDES Coordinator's August 15, 2005, memo and the Recycling Specialist's August 8, 2005, memo shall be met; (8) that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; (9) that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the first half of the North Burlingame Rollins Road Development fee in the amount of$12,593.70, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; (10) that prior to scheduling the final framing inspection for the condominium building,the applicant shall pay the second half of the North Burlingame Rollins Road Development fee in the amount of$12,593.70,made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; (11) that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project,the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to establish the affordability of the three below market rate units required as a part of this project;the applicant shall also submit a below market rate housing plan which shall describe in detail the applicant's proposal for a third party to meet and manage the inclusionary housing requirements as required by Chapter 25.63 of the Burlingame Municipal Code;the applicant shall enter into an agreement with a third-party non-profit organization approved by the City to administer the program; (12) that'guest parking stall'shall be marked on the three guest parking spaces and designated on the final map and plans,these stalls shall not be assigned to any unit,but shall be owned and maintained by the condominium association, and the guest stalls shall always be accessible for parking and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage;and that in addition to the three guest parking stalls,and one service vehicle parking stall,52 parking spaces shall be available on site for owners,and none of the on-site parking shall be rented, leased or sold to anyone who does not own a unit on the site; (13) that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the three guest parking stalls shall be reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; (14) that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; (15) that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association,an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; (16) that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; (17) that the security gate system across the right side entrance driveway shall be installed a minimum 20'-0'back from the front property line; the security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; (18) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; (19) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; (20) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer,or another architect or residential design professional,shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays,are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; (21) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; (22) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas,a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; (23) that this project shall comply with the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; (24) that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; (25) that project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps, controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise requirement; (26) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame; (27) that in lieu of meeting the requirement specific to fire apparatus access required by Section 902.2.1,Uniform Fire Code,as adopted by Burlingame Municipal Code 17.04, the project applicant shall extend the required Class I Standpipe outlets to garage stair landings in accordance with fire department approved locations,and install Quick Response Sprinklers throughout the garage; (28) that the proposed project shall comply with construction standards and seismic design criteria contained in the Building Code as adopted by the City; (29) that before construction of the proposed project, per the Building Code, the project applicant shall obtain a site-specific soils report that identifies any potentially unsuitable soil conditions(such as expansive, liquefiable,or compressive soils)and contains appropriate recommendations for foundation type and design criteria,including provisions to reduce the effects of expansive soils.The recommendations made in the soils report for ground preparation and earthwork shall be incorporated in the construction design. The soils evaluations shall be conducted by registered soil professionals,and the measures to eliminate inappropriate soil conditions must be applied.The design for soil support of foundations shall conform to the analysis and implementation criteria described in the Building Code,Chapters 16, 18,and A33; (30) that a site-specific evaluation of soil conditions required by the City shall be completed as part of the building permit process and shall contain recommendations for ground preparation and earthwork specific to the project site that would become an integral part the construction design. Recommendations shall be included in the excavation and construction plans for the proposed project; (3 1) that although the proposed project would be exempt from preparing and implementing a project-specific SWPPP,because the City of Burlingame is a member of the STOPPP, the proposed project shall obtain coverage under STOPPP's Phase I Municipal Storm water Permit and comply with performance standards set forth by STOPPP's Storm water Management Plan.The City Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance(Municipal Code Chapter 15.14;Ordinance 1503 Section 1;June 20, 1994)would also be applied to the proposed project. In addition, the project applicants shall perform the following actions as uniformly required conditions of project approval, as identified by the City's NPDES Coordinator upon submittal of project applications to the City: (a) Implement appropriate storm water best management practices(BMPs)to minimize pesticide usage in accordance with the City's New Development/Redevelopment Landscaping Fact Sheet; (b) Incorporate applicable structural source control measures to minimize storm water pollutants in accordance with the City's Model List of Structural Source Control Measures; (c) Identify the responsible party who would be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the permanent post-construction storm water treatment measure(s). Prior to issuance of a final building permit, submit a completed, notarized Storm water Treatment Measure Maintenance Agreement; (32) that the proposed project shall comply with City grading requirements specified in Section 18.20 of the Municipal Code; (33) that the proposed project shall 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 comply with the City's Model Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 18.17.001; Ordinance 1476 Section 1; January 4, 1993),thereby reducing the amount of project site runoff polluted by landscape chemicals; (34) that the project applicant shall ensure implementation of the following mitigation measures during project construction,in accordance with BAAQMD standard mitigation requirements: (a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily; (b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard; (c) Pave, apply water three times daily,or apply(non-toxic)soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; (d) Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; (e) Sweep streets daily(with water sweepers)if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets; (35) that the project applicant shall prepare and implement a construction phasing plan and traffic management plan that defines how traffic operations would be managed and maintained during each phase of construction. The plan should be developed with the direct participation of the City of Burlingame. To the maximum practical extent,the plan should: (a) Detail how access will be maintained to individual properties where construction activities may interfere with ingress and egress. Any driveway closures shall take place during non-business hours; (b) Specify predetermined haul routes from staging areas to construction sites and to disposal areas of agreement with the City prior to construction. The routes shall follow streets and highways that provide the safest route and have the least impact on traffic. (c) During construction,require the contractor to provide information to the public using signs,press releases,and other media tools of traffic closures,detours or temporary displacement of left-turn lanes. (d) Identify a single phone number that property owners and businesses can call for construction scheduling,phasing,and duration information,as well as for complaints. (e) Identify construction activities that must take place during off-peak traffic hours or result in temporary road closures due to concerns regarding traffic safety or traffic congestion. Any road closures will be done at night under ordinary circumstances. If unforeseen circumstances require road closing during the day, the City of Burlingame should be consulted; (36) that in order to improve the ability of vehicles to turn from the lower level ramp to the driveway, the project has been revised so that the west driveway is 12 feet wide; (37) that the proposed project driveways shall be secured with an automatic gate system that would allow delivery vehicles to enter and exit the driveways with an opener. The entrance gate shall also provide an intercom system that would allow delivery vehicles to call from the entrance.Furthermore,rolling dumpsters shall be acquired by the project applicant, which can be maneuvered outside of the parking garage to the curb, to facilitate garbage pickup from Trousdale Avenue; (38) that the project applicant shall include in the proposed project a bicycle parking area that is 12 feet by 21 feet,in the lower level of the parking garage,as indicated in the site plan which is sufficient space for approximately 25 bicycles; (39) that the removal of trees, shrubs, or weedy vegetation shall be avoided during the February 1 through August 31 bird nesting period to the extent possible. If no vegetation or tree removal is proposed during the nesting period, no surveys shall be required.If it is not feasible to avoid the nesting period,a survey for nesting birds should be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no earlier than 14 days prior to the removal of trees, shrubs, grassland vegetation,buildings, grading, or other construction activity. Survey results shall be valid for 21 days following the survey. The area surveyed shall include all construction sites, access roads, and staging areas, as well as areas within 150 feet outside the boundaries of the areas to be cleared or as otherwise determined by the biologist. In the event that an active nest is discovered in the areas to be cleared, or in other habitats within 150 feet of construction boundaries,clearing and construction shall be postponed for at least two weeks or until a wildlife biologist has determined that the young have fledged(left the nest),the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts; (40) that the trees proposed to be removed shall be evaluated by a licensed arborist whose report shall be reviewed by the City arborist to determine whether they are"protected trees"per Section 11.06.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code and whether a tree removal permit is appropriate. If any trees proposed to be removed are protected trees, the City Arborist shall make a determination regarding the removal and replacement of these trees. As the 12 by of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 proposed landscaping plan includes the planting of 16 new trees, the City Arborist may determine that the proposed landscaping plan is sufficient and no other replacement trees are required. (a) The Municipal Code includes the following requirements regarding replacement trees; (b) Replacement shall be three 15- gallon size, one 24-inch box size, or one 36-inch box size landscape tree(s) for each tree removed;and (c) Any tree removed without a valid permit shall be replaced by two 24-inch box size,or two 36-inch box size landscape trees for each tree removed; and (d) Replacement of a tree may be waived by the director if a sufficient number of trees exists on the property to meet all other requirements of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance; and (e) Size and number of the replacement tree(s)shall be determined by the director and shall be based on the species, location and value of the tree(s) removed; and (f) If replacement trees cannot be planted on the property,payment of equal value shall be made to the City. Such payments shall be deposited in the tree-planting fund to be drawn upon for public tree planting; (41) that the project applicant shall be responsible for maintaining and protecting the existing on-site trees to be retained. The following specific actions shall be followed to maintain the health of the remaining trees: (a) Any pruning shall be done according to the direction of a certified arborist and all pruning shall comply with International Society of Arboriculture, Western Chapter Standards or other comparable standards deemed acceptable to the City Arborist; (b) Any abandoned utility lines (water, electrical, etc.) in the root zones (radius of ten times the trunk diameter) shall be cut and left in the ground to the satisfaction of the City Arborist; (c) Any surfacing material inside the root zone shall be pervious and installed on top of the existing grade.As an example,pervious pavers are acceptable provided the base material is also sufficiently pervious. Base rock containing granite fines is not sufficiently pervious; (d) Temporary construction fencing shall be erected to protect the retained trees of a size to be established by the City Arborist. The fencing shall be placed at the perimeter of the root zone unless the pavement is supervised by a certified arborist. The fencing shall be in place prior to the arrival of construction materials or equipment; (e) The landscape irrigation shall be designed to prevent trenching inside the root zones of retained trees; (f) Supplemental irrigation shall be provided during construction.Approximately 10 gallons of water for each inch of trunk diameter should be applied at or near the perimeter of the root zone every two weeks during the dry months (any month receiving less than 1 inch of rainfall on average); (g) Retained trees shall be thoroughly mulched with a 3-inch layer of bark chips with the exception of a 6-to 12-inch area around the base of the root collar,which must be left bare and dry; (42) that as required by BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 2, the proposed project shall implement preventative measures during demolition and removal of all asbestos containing materials (ACMs)to prevent emissions of asbestos into the air. The proposed project shall also remove and dispose of all asbestos and PCB-containing materials according to Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) regulations and comply with the Cal/OSHA guidelines for worker safety during removal; (43) that the project applicant shall abide by its declared building height as specified in the FAA determination for the proposed project. The project applicant shall also ensure that construction equipment for the proposed project(e.g. cranes) shall not exceed the maximum height restriction specified in the San Francisco Airport Land Use Plan for the project site; (44) that if markings or lighting are to be included in the proposed project, the project applicant shall ensure that they are installed and maintained according to FAA guidelines; (45) that the applicant shall incorporate the following practices into the construction documents to be implemented by the project contractor.These control measures,such as installation of noise control devices (e.g. mufflers), selection of quieter machinery, and other noise control measures (e.g. surrounding stationary equipment with noise barriers), all of which would not require major equipment redesign. (a) Maximize the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors. Such separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures: (1) Use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly noisy areas of the site or around the entire site; (2) Use shields,impervious fences,or other physical sound barriers to inhibit transmission of noise to sensitive receptors; (3) Locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and (4) Minimize backing movements of equipment; (b) Use quiet construction equipment whenever possible; (c) 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 Impact equipment(e.g.,jackhammers and pavement breakers)shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically-powered tools. Compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other equipment. Other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment, shall be used whenever feasible; (d) Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines; (e) Select routes for movement of construction-related vehicles and equipment in conjunction with the Burlingame Planning Department so that noise-sensitive areas,including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible; (f) The project applicant shall designate a "disturbance coordinator"for construction activities.The coordinator would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration.The coordinator would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem; (g) The construction contractor shall send advance notice to neighborhood residents within 50 feet of the project site regarding the construction schedule and including the telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site; (46) that the project applicant shall incorporate the following practice into the construction documents to be implemented by the project contractor.The project applicant shall require that loaded trucks and other vibration-generating equipment avoid areas of the project site that are located near existing residential uses to the maximum extent compatible with project construction goals; (47) that the project applicant shall include in the final project design noise insulation features that would effectively maintain interior noise levels of 45 dBA or less; (48) that the existing sanitary sewer on site shall be examined by the City after project construction to evaluate the pipe's condition. If the City Engineer determines that the pipe is substandard or if the pipe has been damaged by project construction, the pipe shall be replaced or repaired by the project applicant to the City Engineer's satisfaction; (49) that if the project applicant does not provide a 12-foot wide driveway, the project applicant shall be required to purchase maintenance equipment for the City that can access the on-site sewer easement through the proposed 9.5-foot-wide driveway; (50) that per the City's Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Requirement, the project applicant shall submit a waste reduction plan that demonstrates that at least 50 percent of the construction and demolition waste can be recycled; (51) that the project applicant shall design and locate all exterior lighting so that the cone of light and/or glare from the lighting elements is kept entirely on the project site on or below the top of any fence, hedge, or wall at the site's property line, as required by the Burlingame Municipal Code Section 18.16.030 (pertaining to light spillage off site in commercial or residential areas).All wall mounted up-lighting shall be excluded from the proposed project. All project lighting shall comply with requirements of the California Energy Commission and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America for illumination levels; and (52) that the following provisions shall be incorporated into the grading and construction contracts to address the potential to encounter currently unknown cultural resources: (a) Prior to the initiation of construction or ground- disturbing activities, all construction personnel shall receive environmental training that will include discussion of the possibility of buried cultural and paleontological resources,including training to recognize such possible buried cultural resources, as well as the procedure to follow if such cultural resources are encountered; (b) Retain Project Archaeologist. Since the project area contains a portion of one recorded Native American archeological resource, and other previously unknown prehistoric or historic cultural deposits may be encountered elsewhere in the project site during excavations, the City shall retain the services of a qualified archaeological consultant meeting federal criteria under 36 CFR 61, and who has expertise in California prehistory and urban historical archaeology; (c) If potential historical or unique archaeological resources are discovered during construction, all work in the immediate vicinity shall be suspended and alteration of the materials and their context shall be avoided pending site investigation by a qualified archaeological or cultural resources consultant retained by the project applicant. The immediate vicinity wherein work shall be suspended shall be approximately 50 feet from the discovery or within an appropriate distance to be determined by the archaeologist or cultural resources consultant. Construction work shall not commence again until the archaeological or cultural resources consultant has been given an 14 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 opportunity to examine the findings, assess their significance, and offer proposals for any additional exploratory measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of and/or mitigation of adverse impacts to any potential historical resources or unique archaeological resources that have been encountered; (d) If the find is determined to be an historical or unique archaeological resource, and if avoidance of the resource would not be feasible, the archaeological or cultural resources consultant shall prepare a plan for the methodical excavation of those portions of the site that would be adversely affected. The plan shall be designed to result in the extraction of sufficient volumes of non-redundant archaeological data to address important regional research considerations. The work shall be performed by the archaeological or cultural resources consultant, and shall result in detailed technical reports. Such reports shall be submitted to the California Historical Resources Regional Information Center.Construction in the vicinity of the find shall be accomplished in accordance with current professional standards and shall not recommence until this work is completed; (e) The project applicant shall assure that project personnel are informed that collecting significant historical or unique archaeological resources discovered during development of the project is prohibited by law.Prehistoric or Native American resources can include chert or obsidian flakes,projectile points,mortars,and pestles;and dark friable soil containing shell and bone dietary debris,heat-affected rock, or human burials. Historic resources can include nails,bottles,or other items often found in refuse deposits; (f) If human remains are discovered,there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the discovery site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the project applicant has complied with the provisions of State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). In general, these provisions require that the County Coroner shall be notified immediately. If the remains are found to be Native American,the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours.The most likely descendant of the deceased Native American shall be notified by the Commission and given the chance to make recommendations for the remains. If the Commission is unable to identify the most likely descendent, or if no recommendations are made within 24 hours, remains may be re-interred with appropriate dignity elsewhere on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. If recommendations are made and not accepted,the Native American Heritage Commission will mediate the problem. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the project including the condominium permit, front setback variance, and the conditional use permits for lot coverage and height. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Cauchi,Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:00 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 7. 1560 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR BASEMENT FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (ROBERT AND CYNTHIA GILSON,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;JAMES CHU,CHU DESIGN &ENGINEERING, DESIGNER) (57 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Brownrigg noted that he lives within 500' of the subject property and recused himself from the item. C. Auran noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant and also recused himself from this item. Both Commissioners stepped down from the dais and left the council chambers. Chair Brownrigg passed the gavel to Vice Chair Deal. CA Anderson noted that there was not a quorum on the item and that the applicant must make the decision themselves to either go to a design review consultant for guidance or to place themselves on the action 15 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 calendar after incorporating the changes recommended by the Commission. Without a quorum, the Commission cannot make a motion on this item. ZT Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Two letters were submitted: March 21, 2007 and March 26, 2007. Vice Chair Deal opened the public comment. James Chu,55 W. 43rd Ave, San Mateo,architect,and Robert and Cindy Gilson, property owners; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, commented. Issues noted: existing fence, drainage; and requirements for basements to exempt 700 SF of FAR. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: ■ Looks like front of house is sunk down a couple feet; looks like grade is going down to the house and then up again, needs to be addressed; can do some sort of retaining wall in front of house to step down into a flat landscape area; ■ Will the stone surround be actual stone? ■ The cantilevered stone chimney at the back of the house hanging over a stairwell does not work;need to push chimney into house; ■ Will the attic vents stick out from the roof and will they have arched tops made of copper? Should show on the side elevations; ■ Areas of flat roof could be eliminated;the flat roof area at top will break the 30' maximum line by 6"to 8", which should be easily solved with a special permit;because it is a small area, would be willing to consider a special permit for height to mitigate the flat roof, ■ Note fencing on plans, including where existing fencing is to remain; and ■ A wood beam should be added to the corbels that frame the double doors at the left elevation; ■ Fancy window above entry door is a little small. Because there was no quorum, the Planning Commission only provided direction. The Commission suggested that it would be best for this project to come back on regular action with the provision to allow the applicant to choose to go to a design review consultant. There was no motion. The applicant may decide to either go to a design review consultant or to come back on the regular action calendar. This item concluded at 10:25 p.m. Cers. Brownrigg and Auran returned to the dais. 8. 1511 DRAKE AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(MARK MELAMED,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; YURI BUBNOV, ARCHITECT) (64 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe briefly presented the proj ect description. Commissioners noted that the plans were not to scale, staff noted they had one set to scale which was the basis of the plan check; this is a second floor so entire structure subject to design review?yes;were retaining walls include in the originally submitted plans?No; why is an FAR variance not requested;part of the lower floor will remain as storage with a ceiling height of 5'-11"; noted issues with the accuracy of the plans. Two letters were submitted: Alexander Klein, 1509 Drake,Jani Ochse, 1512 Drake,Janet Garcia, 1561 Drake,together,March 26,2007;and James Frolik, 1517 Drake, March 26, 2007. 16 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Mark Melamed, property owner; Alex Klein, 1509 Drake Avenue; Kirsten Garen, 1509 Drake Avenue; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke. Issues noted included: sheets of plans do not agree;CA noted that the applicant could withdraw and because of the code enforcement the city will follow up with legal action;problem with windows throughout the house; entire project is now subject to design review; location of windows on sides; vegetative screening; drainage; property for sale; can still do what building required, fill space with concrete. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners noted that for design review the plans are considered as proposed project plans. Commissioners gave the following direction: ■ Provide a landscape plan addressing vegetative screening along the sides of the house and at the rear of the addition; ■ Provide a drainage plan, documenting how the system is to be installed and that all water goes into the street as required, and a grading plan; it is a mistake to grade down the rear 6 feet; ■ Scupper should not connect into the sanitary sewer, correct plans; ■ Need to provide better articulation on the elevations to reduce the scale and blend the walls. ■ Adjust window placement to reduce views into the neighbors properties; ■ Should look at a project which makes a modest upper story addition within FAR requirements; ■ All windows should be replaced with simulated true divided lites or true divided lites, all windows should have stucco mold finish consistent with the style of the house; ■ The size of the rear deck should be reduced and the windows removed; ■ There is no connection between the yard and the house,provide access; ■ Architectural forms at rear are not consistent or appropriate with those on the front; ■ Choice of finish materials should include more than stucco; ■ There is too much impervious material surrounding the house; ■ Application is not complete without an accurate set of drawings; ■ If proceed with an FAR variance,need to explain the hardship on the property to justify the variance. Chair Brownrigg moved to refer this project to a design reviewer with the comments made by the Commission and the suggestion that the reviewer listen to the tapes of this meeting. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the project at 1511 Drake Avenue to a design reviewer.The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers.Cauchi,Osterling absent). There is no appeal for this action. The item was completed at 11:15 p.m. Mark Melamed came forward and asked how he could withdraw his design review application. CA told hien to submit a letter in writing to the Planning Department tomorrow. X. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS There were no Commissioner's Reports for review. 17 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 XI. PLANNER REPORTS - City Council regular meeting of March 19, 2007 CP Monroe reviewed briefly the actions taken by the Council at their March 19, 2007, meeting. - FYI: 1520 Arc Way- changes to a previously approved design review project Commission acknowledged these changes. - FYI: 1609 Monte Corvino Way- changes to a previously approved design review project Commission directed that these proposed changes be brought back on the action calendar. - FYI: 110 Clarendon Road—changes to a previously approved design review project Commissioner Deal noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant on this item and would recuse himself from any discussion. He left the dais and chambers. Commissioners directed that this item be brought back to the Commission on the action calendar. C. Deal returned to the chambers. XL ADJOURNMENT Chair Brownrigg adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Deal, Vice Chair and Acting Secretary VAMINUTESWinutelunapproved 03.26.07 18 POLICE DEPARTMENT BURLlfVGAME City of Burlingame Jack L. Van Etten Chief of Police March 2007 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Enclosed you will find statistical documents from the month of February, 2007. As always, please note that the information contained in this police department report is displayed in both numbers and percentages. Please remember that the percentages of certain crimes might've dramatically increased or decreased in percentage (compared to the previous month or year). When reviewing the police department report kindly also consider the actual numbers in various crime categories in conjunction with the percentages. Even though the percentages may have increased or decreased, the actual number change may be slight or negligible. Please feel free to contact me at anytime if you have any questions or concerns about the numbers or percentages. There have been some inquiries about the status of some of the emergency notification systems for both Emergency Services Personnel and the Public. Roam Secure is being finalized on both the Emergency and Public sides. The Public side of Roam Secure is on our website under the Community link, Emergency Information/Community Alert. However, groups (such as Downtown Merchants, Broadway Merchants, Ray Park Residential area, etc., still need to be created and the system will need to be advertised for the public to sign-up. The Burlingame Police Department plans to use the Public side of Roam Secure to provide crime information and public notifications to our business districts and citizens. Citizens or businesses can voluntarily sign up to receive the information. We are moving forward on this project and it should be up and running very shortly. As we fast approach the summer, our community will begin experiencing a number of block parties occurring throughout our city. I plan to assign officers to a number of these events, since the police department has experienced a large turnover in personnel due to retirements. I believe this is an excellent way for our officers (especially the new ones) to immerse themselves in our community, by their presence, provide crime prevention, Neighborhood Watch and Emergency preparedness information to our citizens. As you know, the police department routinely and continuously receives information from the public regarding a number of criminal, traffic and parking related matters. All of these matters are immediately addressed, prioritized (based on the safety of the community), and depending on staffing levels, handled in the most effective manner possible. When necessary, overtime is used and (or) additional outside resources are also brought in to assist current staff with specific problems or unusual criminal activities. 1111 Trousdale Drive-Post Office Box 551 -Burlingame, California 94011-0551 -(650)777-4100- Fax (650)697-8130 Both the moving and parking citation totals continue to show slight increases over last year. I've included the most recent selective traffic enforcement areas (related to addressing traffic related complaints in our community) that are routinely being monitored by our patrol officers. This information includes the types of violations that are being monitored. The police department is constantly monitoring the statistical information at all selective enforcement sites for future reference. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully, of Ja Van Etten Burlingame Police Department MEMORANDUM To: All Patrol Personnel From: Sgt. Williams Date: 03/09/2007 Subject: Selective Enforcement As time permits, please advise your teams to attempt selective enforcement in the listed areas: Location Violation Description Time of offense Date Reported R/R Crossings/22451 VC Veh/Ped viol./ All hours Continuous R/R Tracks 602.8 PC Trespassing Broadway Av 21950 VC yield to ped All hours Continuous Howard Ave. 22350 VC Speeding All hours 3/2/07 Hinckley Rd. 22350 VC Speeding Morning/evening 3/6/07 Easton Dr. 22450 VC Stop sign All hours 3/8/07 Adeline Dr. 22350/450 Speed/Stop sign commute hrs 2/7/07 Bayswater(all) 22350 VC Speeding commute hrs 2/1/07 Blgm Ave/Primrose 21954 VC jaywalking All hours 1/26/07 Trousdale/ECR 21453 VC Red light viol. commute hrs 1/19/07 Carmelita (all) 22350 VC Speeding commute hrs 1/23/07 Easton/Columbus 22450 VC Stop sign viol morning hrs. 1/11/07 Douglas Ave. 22350 VC Speeding commute hrs 1/12/07 Barriolhett 22350 VC Speeding(1500 blk) All hours 12/20/07 1350 Bayshore 13.32.030 Bus zone viol All hours 12/18/06 by taxi's Carolan/Morrell 21950 VC Fail to yield to Am hours 12/14/06 Ped in crosswalk Carmelita Ave 22350 VC Speeding 7am-9am 11/17/06 13-08-07 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD :rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change 4urder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 4anslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 tape By Force 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery Firearm 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Robbery Knife 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Robbery Other Dangerous Weapon 1 0 1 0 1 Robbery Strong-Arm 0 2 1 2 -1 -50.00 Assault - Firearm 0 0 0 0 0 Assault - Knife 0 0 0 0 0 Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon 1 1 3 3 0 0.00 Assault - Hands,Fists,Feet 1 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Assault - Other (Simple) 20 10 32 34 -2 -5.88 Burglary - Forcible Entry 2 7 5 12 -7 -58.33 Burglary - Unlawful Entry 6 4 10 le -B -44.44 Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Larceny Shoplifting 0 3 1 8 -7 -87.50 Larceny From Motor Vehicle 14 29 29 51 -22 -43.14 Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 11 10 25 22 3 13.64 Larceny Bicycles 1 1 2 1 1 100.00 Larceny From Building 10 10 12 13 -1 -7.69 Larceny From Any Cain-Op Machine 0 3 5 4 1 25.00 Larceny All Other 3 4 10 15 -5 -33.33 Motor Vehicle Theft Auto 10 7 17 14 3 21.43 Motor Vehicle Theft Bus 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Motor Vehicle Theft Other 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 ------- ------ ------ ------ 80 94 154 207 80 94 154 207 13-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD ;rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change ill Other Offenses 25 41 46 73 -27 -36.99 knimal Abuse 0 0 0 0 0 knimal Nuisance 0 0 0 0 0 krson 0 4 2 4 -2 -50.00 assists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Bigamy 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Offense 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Threat 0 0 0 0 0 Bribery 0 0 0 0 0 Check Offenses 1 1 2 2 0 0.00 Child Neglect/prot custody 7 5 12 12 0 0.00 Computer Crime 0 0 0 0 0 Conspiracy 0 0 0 0 0 Credit Card Offenses 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Cruelty to Dependent Adult 0 0 0 0 0 Curfew and Loitering Laws 0 0 0 0 0 Death Investigation 1 1 5 5 0 0.00 Disorderly Conduct 0 3 0 5 -5 -100.00 Driver's License Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Driving Under the Influence 8 6 19 13 6 46.15 Drug Abuse Violations 3 5 7 7 0 0.00 Drug/Sex Registrants/Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Drunkeness 5 3 16 7 9 128.57 Embezzlement 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Escape 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion 0 0 1 0 1 False Police Reports 0 0 1 0 1 False Reports of Emergency 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Fish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Forgery and Counterfeiting 5 6 5 8 -3 -37.50 Found Property 4 6 8 9 -1 -11.11 Fraud 3 5 6 5 1 20.00 Gambling 0 0 0 0 0 Harrassing Phone Calls 2 1 6 5 3 60.00 )3-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD ;rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change lit and Run Accidents 3 3 5 6 -1 -16.67 Impersonation 1 0 3 0 3 Incest 0 0 0 0 0 Indecent Exposure 2 0 2 1 1 100.00 Intimidating a Witness 0 0 0 0 0 Kidnapping 0 0 0 0 0 Lewd Conduct 0 0 1 0 1 Liquor Laws 1 0 1 0 1 Littering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0 Marijuana Violations 4 1 6 4 2 50.00 Mental Health Cases 5 7 13 16 -3 -18.75 Missing Person 6 3 10 9 1 11.11 Missing Property 11 9 15 16 -1 -6.25 Municipal Code Violations 11 15 20 22 -2 -9.09 Narcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 0 0 0 . Offenses Against Children 0 1 0 3 -3 -100.00 Other Assaults 20 10 32 34 -2 -5.88 Other Juvenile Offenses 0 0 0 0 0 Other Police Service 3 8 5 12 -7 -58.33 Pandering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Parole Violations 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Perjury 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of Burglary Tools 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0 Probation Violations 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Prostitution and Commercial Vice 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Prowling 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 Resisting Arrest 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Restraining Orders 1 0 1 0 1 Runaways (Under 18) 0 0 0 0 0 Sex Offenses 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Sex Offenses against Children 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Sodomy 0 0 0 0 0 Stalking 0 0 0 0 0 I3-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD I rime Classification.................... Current Year. . YTD... YTD... Change Change Statutory Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Stolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 Suspended License 2 3 7 7 0 0.00 Pax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0 Terrorist Threats 1 '0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Towed vehicle 35 23 71 44 27 61.36 Trespassing 2 2 2 4 -2 -50.00 Truants/Incorrigible Juvs 0 0 0 0 0 US Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 Vagrancy 0 0 0 0 0 Vandalism 9 13 21 30 -9 -30.00 Vehicle Code Violations 2 0 4 0 4 Violation of Court Order 1 0 2 2 0 0.00 Warrants - Felony 2 0 4 2 2 100.00 Warrants - Misd 2 5 6 11 -5 -45.45 Weapons;Carrying,Possessing 0 1 3 1 2 200.00 Welfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ ------ ------ 188 194 377 398 188 194 377 398 13-08-07 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD .rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change lurder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 Qanslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 tape By Force 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 lttempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Zobbery Firearm 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 robbery Knife 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 2obbery Other Dangerous Weapon 1 0 1 0 1 2obbery Strong-Arm 0 2 1 2 -1 -50.00 assault - Firearm 0 0 0 0 0 lssault - Knife 0 0 0 0 0 4ssault - Other Dangerous Weapon 1 1 3 3 0 0.00 assault - Hands,Fists,Feet 1 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 !lssault - Other (Simple) 20 10 32 34 -2 -5.88 Burglary - Forcible Entry 2 7 5 12 -7 -58.33 Burglary - Unlawful Entry 6 4 10 18 -8 -44.44 Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Larceny Shoplifting 0 3 1 8 -7 -87.50 Larceny From Motor Vehicle 14 29 29 51 -22 -43.14 Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 11 10 25 22 3 13.64 Larceny Bicycles 1 1 2 1 1 100.00 Larceny From Building 10 10 12 13 -1 -7.69 Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 0 3 5 4 1 25.00 Larceny All Other 3 4 10 15 -5 -33.33 Motor Vehicle Theft Auto 10 7 17 14 3 21.43 Motor Vehicle Theft Bus 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Motor Vehicle Theft Other 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 ------- ------ ------ ------ 80 94 154 207 60 94 154 207 )3-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD :rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change All Other Offenses 25 41 46 73 -27 -36.99 Animal Abuse 0 0 0 0 0 Animal Nuisance 0 0 0 0 0 Arson 0 4 2 4 -2 -50.00 Assists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Bigamy 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Offense 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Threat 0 0 0 0 0 Bribery 0 0 0 0 0 Check Offenses 1 1 2 2 0 0.00 Child Neglect/prot custody 7 5 12 12 0 0.00 Computer Crime 0 0 0 0 0 Conspiracy 0 0 0 0 0 Credit Card Offenses 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Cruelty to Dependent Adult 0 0 0 0 0 Curfew and Loitering Laws 0 0 0 0 0 Death Investigation 1 1 5 5 0 0.00 Disorderly Conduct 0 3 0 5 -5 -100.00 Driver's License Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Driving Under the Influence 8 6 19 13 6 46.15 Drug Abuse Violations 3 5 7 7 0 0.00 Drug/Sex Registrants/Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Drunkeness 5 3 16 7 9 128.57 Embezzlement 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Escape 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion 0 0 1 0 1 False Police Reports 0 0 1 0 1 False Reports of Emergency 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Fish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Forgery and Counterfeiting 5 6 5 8 -3 -37.50 Found Property 4 6 8 9 -1 -11.11 Fraud 3 5 6 5 1 20.00 Gambling 0 0 0 0 0 Harrassing Phone Calls 2 1 8 5 3 60.00 )3-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2• CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD :rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change % Change lit and Run Accidents 3 3 5 6 -1 -16.67 Impersonation 1 0 3 0 3 Incest 0 0 0 0 0 Indecent Exposure 2 0 2 1 1 100.00 Intimidating a Witness 0 0 0 0 0 Kidnapping 0 0 0 0 0 Lewd Conduct 0 0 1 0 1 Liquor Laws 1 0 1 0 1 Littering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0 Karijuana Violations 4 1 6 4 2 50.00 Mental Health Cases 5 7 13 16 -3 -18.75 Kissing Person 6 3 10 9 1 11.11 Missing Property 11 9 15 16 -1 -6.25 Municipal Code Violations 11 15 20 22 -2 -9.09 Narcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 0 0 0 Offenses Against Children 0 1 0 3 -3 -100.00 Other Assaults 20 10 32 34 -2 -5.88 other Juvenile Offenses 0 0 0 0 0 Other Police Service 3 8 5 12 -7 -56.33 Pandering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Parole Violations 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Perjury 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of Burglary Tools 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0 Probation Violations 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Prostitution and Commercial Vice 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Prowling 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 Resisting Arrest 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Restraining Orders 1 0 1 0 1 Runaways (Under 18) 0 0 0 0 0 Sex Offenses 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Sex Offenses against Children 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Sodomy 0 0 0 0 0 Stalking 0 0 0 0 0 03-08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act YTD YTD Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD... YTD... Change Change Statutory Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Stolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 Suspended License 2 3 7 7 0 0.00 Tax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0 Terrorist Threats 1 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 Towed Vehicle 35 23 71 44 27 61.36 Trespassing 2 2 2 4 -2 -50.00 Truants/Incorrigible Juvs 0 0 0 0 0 US Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 Vagrancy 0 0 0 0 0 Vandalism 9 13 21 30 -9 -30.00 Vehicle Code Violations 2 0 4 0 4 Violation of Court Order 1 0 2 2 0 0.00 Warrants - Felony 2 0 4 2 2 100.00 Warrants - Misd 2 5 6 11 -5 -45.45 Weapons;Carrying,Possessing 0 1 3 1 2 200.00 Welfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ ------ ------ 188 194 377 398 188 194 377 398 03 -08-07 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS PAGE : 1 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2007 Prev Last Act Act Crime Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Year. . YTD . . . YTD. . . Parking Citations 3352 2 , 394 7 , 083 4 , 489 Moving Citations 193 228 438 436 --- ---- -- - --- - - - - - - - - --- - 3545 2 , 622 7, 521 4 , 925 ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ 3545 2 , 622 7 , 521 4 , 925 b U l 11V lil�l�l r Officer Productivity. . . . generated on 03/08/2007 at 03 : 45 : 29 PM Reported On: All Officers Report Range: 02/01/2007 to 02/28/2007 Data Type Reported on: PARKING Valid % All Voids o All Officer: ID: Cnt Valid Cnt Voids Valid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ALVISO 355 813 25.36 8 14.81 99.03 DOTSON 509 804 25.08 15 27.78 98.17 FEITELBERG 508 755 23.55 4 7.41 99.47 GARRETT 501 517 16.13 21 38.89 96.10 MORAN 201 71 2.21 2 3.70 97.26 SMITH 654 246 7.67 4 7.41 98.40 Total 3206 54 Page 1 of 1 rr aI x -- .e BURL NO-AM[ 4 MAN March 9, 2007 THE BIG READ: T6 Kill a Mockingbird More than 40 programs are now in place for the month of April "To Kill a Mockingbird" month. Burlingame will host the opening night program on April 3rd, as well as two film programs, including the producer of"The N Word" who will join us from Los Angles to talk about her film. Calendars, bookmarks, booklists, posters and fliers will be ready by March 15th for distribution to libraries, book stores, schools, colleges and retail stores to advertise the event. We have already had one article in the San Mateo County Times. I will see to it that you receive the printed materials as soon as they are ready. Information will also be available on our website: www.plsinfo.ori/tkm. Veterans of War, Veterans of Peace On March 7th, the library presented a program based on the book compiled by Maxine Hong Kingston: Veterans of War, Veterans of Peace. Maureen Nerli, a Burlingame resident and former member of the United Service Organization volunteer in Vietnam, brought a panel of authors to the library for a reading from their works and a Q 8v A regarding their war experiences. The event was a moving and important tribute to our veterans and those serving in the war. There were Vietnam veterans and Iraqi veterans in the audience which added to the poignancy of the evening. Budget Time The library budget is nearly complete and is due to the city on March 23rd. We are hoping to increase some additional staff hours in children's and reference, and add some hours to our maintenance crew. There will be some increases in collections and databases, but otherwise the budget will be very similar to last year. I did not ask for additional public service hours; however additional public service hours are included in the List of Unfunded Items I shared with you last month and with Council this month. Unlike previous years, the budgets will be presented in 5 minutes segments by the Department Heads rather than presented by the City Council members themselves. Department Heads may offer a one page presentation. 48o Primrose Road•Burlingame•California 94010-4o83 Phone(650)558-7474'Fax(65o) 342-6295•www.burlingame.org/library Foundation Budget Wishlist The Foundation has approved $ 60,000 in funding for collections, children's and adult programming for 2007-2008. 1st Annual Foundation Author's Luncheon The First annual Foundation Author's Luncheon will feature former Senator.Jackie Speier of Hillsborough discussing the book she co-wrote with three other authors, Mi_chaelene Cristini Risley, Jan Yanehiro and Deborah Collins Stephens: "This is not the life I ordered: 50 way to keep you head above water when life keeps dragging you down." The event will be held on Saturday, May 5th at the Crystal Springs Country Club at noon. Two hundred tickets are the maximum that can be sold. Letters have gone out to former donors to request underwriting of the event. This is the first of what the Foundation Board hopes will be an annual and growing event. We expect this event to sell out based on the buzz so far! Patron Ban from February Meeting We have received a letter from Marika Matyus regarding her banning from the library. It is unclear what she is asking for in the letter. City Attorney, Larry Anderson and I are working on the next steps which we feel should be facilitated by an outside agency such as Conflict Resolution, due to the inflammatory nature of the previous encounters with the patron. The ban on the patron is expected to expire on Tuesday, May 15th, according the Board's February action. I will keep you posted on any changes in this situation as they arise. Upcoming Events: • Library Board Meeting, March 20, 5:30 PM • All Staff Meeting, March 22, 9 AM • BIG READ banners up on library building, March 26th • BIG READ events begin, April 3, Burlingame Library • Spring Sunday Closure, April 8th • Foundation April meeting, April 12, 5:30 PM • Library Board Meeting, April 17, 5:30 PM • California Library Association, Legislative Day, April 18, Sacramento • Foundation Book Sale, April 27, 28, 29 • Foundation Author's Luncheon, May 5, 2007, Noon • Memorial Day Closure, May 27 and 28; reopen May 29 • City Budget Study Session, May 30, 6 PM, Lane Community Room • Burlingame Centennial Parade, Saturday, June 2nd Alfred H. Escoffier City Librarian March 9, 2007